HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006/09/19 Item 17
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /0
Meeting Date 9/19/06
ITEM TITLE:
Report on requests by the Rolling Hills Ranch Community Association and
residents to amend Truck Route designations on Lane Avenue, Proctor
Valley Road and Hunte Parkway and regarding potential traffic control
enhancements to Lane Avenue.
Acting Director ofEn~e~g ~D1 L-~
Acting City Engineer ;ttt<-.....W 'o::j
Chief of Policeb "'f'5- ~
1.%
Interim City Manager {jI
(4/5ths Vote: Yes~o.x,J
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At the June 6, 2006 City Council Meeting, residents of properties abutting Lane Avenue asked
the City Council to reconsider the decision to designate Lane Avenue as a Truck Route. This
request was later expanded by a letter from the Rolling Hills Ranch Association (June 19, 2006)
to include Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway. This item was scheduled for Council
discussion at the August 22, 2006 meeting, but was continued. The continuance allowed further
opportunity for staffto work with the community, the City Attorney's Office and the Chula Vista
Police Department to explore potential alternatives.
RECOMMENDATION: Accept the report and direct staff to proceed with implementation of
trial all-way stop control at the intersection of Lane Avenue and MacKenzie Creek Road.
BOARD/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Ordinance 3033 (March 2006) which amended Ordinance 2482 and chapter 10.64 ofChula Vista
Municipal Code specifically amended Section 10.64.010 and repealed Section 10.64.040 of the
Municipal Code making the designation of Truck Routes an administrative action under the
purview of the City Engineer (see Attachment A). The report on this Agenda item included
information for the City Council and public regarding Truck Route designations on local streets,
but because of the associated amendment, the actual designations of Truck Routes did not require
Council action. As required by conflict of interest codes, Mayor Padilla abstained from the item
due to property ownership within 500 feet of one of the designations.
At the June 6, 2006 City Council Meeting, residents of properties abutting Lane Avenue asked
the City Council to reconsider the decision to designate Lane A venue as a Truck Route. This
request was later expanded by a letter from the Rolling Hills Ranch Association (June 19, 2006)
to include Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway (see Attachment B). The concerns of the
residents were further explored during a Community Meeting on July 31, 2006 at Thurgood
Marshall Elementary School. The continuance of this item from the August 22, 2006 Council
Agenda allowed further opportunity for staff to work with the community, the City Attorney's
17-1
Page 2, Item ) '1
Meeting Date 09119106
Office and the Chula Vista Police Department to explore potential alternatives.
Since that time, as communicated in a September 7, 2006 memorandum on this subject (see
Attachment C), with the City Engineer's concurrence, the Engineering Department temporarily
removed the Truck Route designation signs from the northern part of Lane Avenue and replaced
the trucks (over five tons) prohibited signs that had been previously posted.
Through follow-up conversations with the community, City staff had gained further understanding
of actions by past City employees who had. supported the community had by reinforcing the
prohibition of trucks over five tons on the northern part of Lane A venue (Boswell Road to Proctor
Valley Road) with the installation of signage. Because the City's Municipal Code makes it
unlawful to operate a vehicle weighing in excess of 10,000 pounds except upon a truck route
designated within the city limits, signs are somewhat unnecessary to indicate the prohibition of
trucks upon streets lacking Truck Route signs. Therefore, we believe that the posting of trucks-
over-five-tons-prohibited signs confirms the position of past City staff. Although there is no
technical reason to have taken this action and no formal historical documentation explaining this
action, it is understandably of significant importance to the community. Current City staff was
unaware of this piece of neighborhood history and felt upon further review that it needed to be
considered as we move forward.
The September 7'h memorandum noted however, that this action to prohibit trucks (over five
tons) from the northern part of Lane Avenue will be re-evaluated upon the opening of SR-125
and in consideration of anticipated future industrial and commercial development patterns. This
approach allows the situation to be reconsidered after new traffic patterns have been established
and the area is closer to build-out, as well as providing the community with ample notice that a
change may eventually be made should future transportation demands indicate the need for an
expanded Truck Route network.
Rp.c:nmmp.n(IE:~ri Tr~ffic: rnntTol Fnh:mC"P,memt" on T ;::Inp. Avp.nl1f~
Residents have also expressed concerns about pedestrian safety on Lane Avenue. On Monday, July
31 st, City staff from the Engineering, Planning & Building, and Police Departments met with a
group of about 18 residents to discuss the Truck Route designations. At that meeting, residents
further voiced their concerns and indicated a desire to pursue legal action. The community was
noticed via hand posted meeting postcards placed on doors of almost 200 residences, email contact
with two residents who had agreed to be communication linkages, posting on the Rolling Hills
Ranch Community Association web page and an information item to City Council.
The residents further emphasized their concerns regarding traffic safety and truck traffic noise in the
Rolling Hills Ranch community in general and specifically on Lane Avenue. The group was able to
reach consensus for installation of potential roadway enhancements, given the Truck Route
designation (see Attachment D). Although the Truck Route designation situation has changed, staff
recommends that we proceed with trial installation of all-way stop control with painted crosswalks
at Lane Avenue and MacKenzie Creek Road.
17-2
Page 3, Item ) '1
Meeting Date 09/19/06
All-way stop control at Stone Canyon Road was also recommended by City staff, however this
option was eliminated by attendees because of the vehicle noise concerns voiced by a family living
on that particular comer.
Residents have previously requested all-way stops and crosswalks on Lane A venue at Stone
Canyon Road and MacKenzie Creek Road. These possibilities were considered by the Safety
Commission and were not approved since requirements were not met. However, given the pilot
traffic calming effort in the area and the input provided during the Truck Route process, staff
recommends proceeding with trial installation of all-way stops and crosswalks at Lane Avenue and
MacKenzie Creek Road. The residents have agreed to a trial period of 60 days after which staff
would return to the City Council with a recommendation for a final disposition pursuant to CVMC
1O.12.030.D whereby the City Engineer may test traffic control devices under actual traffic
conditions.
A review of the accident rate on this roadway shows that the accident rate of 0.77 accidents per
million vehicle miles is 76% below the statewide accident rate of 3.18 for similar roadways in
California. The speed limit is posted at 35 MPH within the industrial zone and at 40 MPH within
the subdivision. The difference in speed limits is due to the fact that the roadway is wider within
the subdivision at 74-feet and the 85th percentile speed is at 41 MPH while the south end of the
street is 64-feet in width with an 85th percentile speed of38 MPH. Speed limits are generally set at
the closest five-mile per hour interval to the 85th percentile speed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the
proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity
is not subject to CEQA.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICTS: Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City
Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries ofthe property
which is the subject of this action.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund with this project at this time.
Attachments:
A - City OfChula Vista Municipal Code 10.64.010
B - Rolling Hills Ranch Letter
C - Memorandum dated September 7,2006
D - Potential Roadway Enhancement locations
(File No.: TF339IKY-158)
nEngineerIAGENDA\CAS2006\09-19-06IAGENDAST A TEMENT. truckroute0911 06
17-3
ATTACHMENT ~
10.64.010 Compliance required when.
Except when provided in CVMC 10.64.020 and 10.64.030, it is unlawful
to operate a vehicle weighing in excess of 10,000 pounds except upon a
truck route designated within the city limits. This section is effective when
signs marked "truck route" have been installed along the designated truck
routes, and the city engineer has installed signage at each vehicular point of
entry into Chula Vista restricting vehicles in excess of 10,000 pounds to
designated truck routes. The city engineer shall maintain within a register
Schedule VII listing all streets or portions of streets that are designated
"truck routes." (Ord. 3033 ~ 1, 2006; Ord. 2670, 1996; Ord. 2482 ~ 1, 1991;
Ord. 2024 ~ 1, 1983; Ord. 973 ~ 1, 1966; prior code ~ 19.13.1 (A)).
17-4
REeEI.VEr
JUN 2 3 ZOot
Rolling-HillsRanch
ATTACHMENT ~
June 19, 2006
The Honorable ~n C. Padilla
Mayor, City otChula Vista
276 FouptfAvenue
Ch~ista, CA 91910
RE: Truck Route through the Rolling Hills Ranch Community
Dear Mayor Padilla:
We are writing on behalf of the residents and homeowners of Rolling Hills
Ranch. Rolling Hills Ranch is a Master Planned Community with about 1,650
homes, with several times that number of residents. It has five multi-million dollar
Swim Clubs and extensive landscaping.
Rolling Hills Ranch is also located in the vicinity of a Light Industrial Park
and both north and south of Proctor Valley Road, east of the East H Street
ingress and egress intersection of the new SR-125. While the residents of
Rolling Hills Ranch knew that these conditions existed when they purchased their
homes, the businesses located in the Light Industrial Park also knew that there
was a residential neighborhood abutting this area.
Until recently, the route for trucks over 5,000 pounds traveling east from 1-
805 was east on Qtay Lakes Road, and then north on either EastLake Parkway
or Lane Avenue, with the northern boundary street of Boswell Rd. However, with
no prior notice to the homeowners of Rolling Hills Ranch, the 5,000 lb. weight
limit signs on Lane Ave. north of. Boswell as well as on Hunte Parkway and
Proctor Valley Rd. east of SR-125 have been replaced with "Truck Route" signs.
Upon investigation by some of the homeowners in the community, it was
discovered that this change was made at the March 21, 2006 meeting of the City
Council, at which an amendment to Chapter 10.64 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code was approved. This change now means that trucks in excess of 10,000
Ibs. will be able to operate on the streets within this entirely residential area. It
also appears that this change enables heavy trucks, with no time constraints, to
follow either Lane Ave., or Hunte Parkway to Proctor Valley Rd. in order to
access the on or off ramps SR-125. .
Corporate Office
9665 Chesapeake Drive' Suite 300
San Diego, CA 92123-1364
(858) 495-0900 . Fax (858) 495-0909
www.waltersmanagement.com
Regional Office
2300 Boswell Road' Suite 209
Chula Vista. CA91914-3534
(619) 656-3220' Fax (619) 656-6617
17-5
The Rolling Hills Ranch Community Association Board of Directors and its
homeowners respectfully request that this decision be revisited and reversed.
There is still adequate access on Lane Ave. and EastLake Parkway for these
heavy trucks to go to Otay Lakes Road and then to SR-125 without traveling
through a residential neighborhood. The increased traffic, noise, and pollution at
all hours of the day and night will be disruptive to the quiet enjoyment ofthe
homes in Rolling Hills Ranch. From what we have seen, it does not appear
these environmental impacts were properly considered prior to establishing the
new truck routes.
More importantly, there is a significant public safety issue. There are
several schools in the area, as well as the new Montevalle Park. Requiring that
children travel to and from school or to the park across streets where 10,000 Ib.-
plus trucks are traveling is unquestionably unsafe.
This matter is one that needs the immediate and decisive attention of you
and the City Council. As mentioned above, the existing truck routes to the
commercial areas are more than adequate, and avoid the Rolling Hills Ranch
neighborhoods. The plan to run these same trucks through an entirely residential
neighborhood is not acceptable to those living there. The Rolling Hills Ranch
Community Association Board of Directors, the homeowners, and indeed the
entire community, looks forward to the reversal of this change and the restoration
of the 5,000 lb. weight limit in their neighborhood.
David M. Stucky;
President
Rolling Hills Ranch Community Assn.
Cc: Rolling Hills Ranch Community Association Board of Directors
Chura Vista City Council
Chula Vista Engineering Department
City of Chula Vista Planning Department
City of Chula Vista Police Department
Walters Management
RHR Web Page
17-6
~!~
=~
~~~=
- - - -
ATTACHMENT J:L
01Y Of
(HUlA V1SfA
Memorandum
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
To:
THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
A
JIM THOMSON, INTERIM CITY MANAGER (jJ
MATT LITTLE, ACTING CITY ENGINEER~
LEAH BROWDER, ACTING DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERINGW
VIA:
FROM:
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 7,2006
SUBJECT: DESIGNATION OF LANE AVENUE As A TRUCK ROUTE
At the June 6, 2006 City Council Meeting, residents of properties abutting Lane Avenue asked
the City Council to reconsider the decision to designate Lane Avenue as a Truck Route. This
request was later expanded by a letter from the Rolling Hills Ranch Association (June 19,2006)
to include Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway (see Attachment I).
As a result of that request, City staff met with the community and the Rolling Hills Ranch
Association in order to further understand their concerns and neighborhood history. This item
was scheduled for Council discussion at the August 22, 2006 meeting, but was continued. The
continuance allowed further opportunity for staff to work with the community, the City
Attorney's Office and the Chula Vista Police Department to explore potential alternatives.
The March action also amended Section 10.64.010 and repealed Section 10.64.040 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code making the designation of Truck Routes an administrative action under
the purview of the City Engineer.
Of significant concern to the community and to City staff was the issue that past City employees
had supported the community by reinforcing the prohibition of trucks over five tons on the
northern part of Lane Avenue (Boswell Road to Proctor Valley Road) with the installation of
signage. Because the City's Municipal Code makes it unlawful to operate a vehicle weighing in
excess of 10,000 pounds except upon a truck route designated within the city limits, signs are
somewhat unnecessary to indicate the prohibition of trucks upon streets lacking Truck Route
signs. Therefore, we believe that the posting of trucks-over-five-tons-prohibited signs confirms
the position of past City staff. Although there is no technical reason to have taken this action and
no formal historical documentation explaining this action, it is understandably of significant
17-7
Honorable Mayor and City Council
-2-
September 7, 2006
importance to the community. Current City staff was unaware of this piece of neighborhood
history and feels upon further review that it needs to be considered as we move forward.
Therefore, with the City Engineer's concurrence, the Engineering Department will be
temporarily removing the Truck Route designation signs from the northern part of Lane Avenue
and replacing the trucks (over five tons) prohibited signs previously posted. This action will be
re-evaluated upon the opening ofSR-125 and in consideration of anticipated future industrial and
commercial development patterns. This approach will allow the situation to be reconsidered
after new traffic patterns have been established and the area is closer to build-out, as well as
providing the community with ample notice that a change may eventually be made should future
transportation demands indicate the need for an expanded Truck Route network.
It is important to note that this action is only supportable given the continued designation of
Proctor Valley Road and Hunte Parkway as Truck Routes. This allows trucks a route from
Proctor Valley Road (Mt. Miguel Road area) to Otay Lakes Road and other potential southerly
destinations. Restricting trucks on these two major roadways along with the northern part of
Lane Avenue would create a network of trucks-prohibited streets creating an island for industrial
and commercial destinations south of Proctor Valley Road. This would trigger the California
Vehicle Code "direct route" provision (Section 35703) thereby allowing commercial trucks to
select their most direct route through a series of trucks prohibited streets, including streets like
Rocking Horse Drive and MacKenzie Creek Drive.
Staff would like to thank families in the community, such as the Reorks, and also the Rolling
Hills Ranch Association for constructively supporting internal efforts to fully understand the
history of this issue and current community concerns.
Cc: Joan Dawson, Deputy City Attorney
Don Hunter, Chula Vista Police Department
17-8
_%1~~~~'.~i
ATTACHMENT ,
RECEP/ED
J'1 >I 2 .. ~~.,,~
. L:r; . ~ "tItlO
Rolling-HillsRanch
June 19, 2006
The Honorable ~n C. Padilla
Mayor, City ..Pf'Chula Vista
276 Four:t[(Avenue
Ch~sta, CA 91910
RE: Truck Route through the Rolling HiIls Ranch Community
Dear Mayor Padilla:
We are writing on behalf of the residents and homeowners of Rolling Hills
Ranch. Rolling Hiils Ranch is a Master Planned Community with about 1,650
homes, with several times that number of residents. It has five multi-million dollar
Swim Clubs and extensive landscaping.
Rolling Hills Ranch is also located in the vicinity of a Light Industrial Park
and both north and south of Proctor Valley Road, east of the East H Street
ingress and egress intersection of the new SR-125. While the residents of
Rolling Hills Ranch knew that these conditions existed when they purchased their
homes, the businesses located in the Light Industrial Park also knew that there
was a residential neighborhood abutting this area.
Until recently, the route for trucks over 5,000 pounds traveling east from 1-
805 was east on atay Lakes Road, and then north on either EastLake Parkway
or Lane Avenue, with the northem boundary street of Boswell Rd. However, with
no prior notice to the homeowners of Rolling Hills Ranch, the 5,000 lb. weight
limit signs on Lane AVe. north of Boswell as well as on Hunte Parkway and
Proctor Valley Rd. east of SR-125 have been replaced with "Truck Route" signs.
Upon investigation by some of the homeowners in the community, it was
diScovered that this change was made at the March 21, 2006 meeting of the City
Council, at which an amendment to Chapter 10.64 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code Was approved. This change now means .that trucks in excess of 10,000.
Ibs. wlli be able to operate on the streets within this entirely residential area. It
also appears that this change enables heavy trucks, with no time constraints, to
follow either Lane Ave., or Hunte Parkway to Proctor Valley Rd. in order to
access the on or off ramps SR-125..
;ate Office
lesap<:2ke Drive . Suite 300
p"n rA Q'),"')'2 1 ':J.t:.A
17-9
Regional Office
2300 B05'iVe'n "Rn"ri' . ,,,~~_ 'lnn
The Rolling Hills Ranch Community Association Board of Directors and its
. homeowners respectfully request that this decision be revisited and reversed.
There is still adequate acces~ on Lane Ave. and EastLake Parkway for these
heavy trucks to go to Otay. Lakes Road and then to SR-125 without traveling
through a residential neighborhood. The increased traffic, noise, and pollution at
all hours of the day and night will be disruptive to the quiet enjoyment of the
homes in Rolling Hills Ranch. From what we have seen, it does not appear
these environmental impacts were properly considered prior to establishing the
new truck routes.
More importantly, there is a significant public safety issue. There are
several schools in the area, as well as the new Montevalle Park. Requiring that
children travel to and from schooi or to the park .across streets where 10,000 ib.-
pius tru<:;ks are traveling is unquestionably unsafe.
This matter is one that needs the immediate and decisive attention of you
and the City Council. As mentioned above, the existing truck routes to the
commercial areas are more than adequate, and avoid the Rolling Hills Ranch
neighborhoods. The plan to run these same trucks through an entireiy residential
neighborhood is not acceptable to those living there. The Rolling Hills Ranch
Community Association Board of Directors, the homeowners, and indeed the
entire community, looks forward to the reversal of this change and the restoration
of the 5,000 lb. weight limit in their neighborhood.
David M. Stucki
President
Rolling Hills Ranch Community Assn.
Cc: Rolling Hills Ranch Community Association Board of Directors
Chula Vista City Council
Chula Vista Engineering Department
City of Chula Vista Planning Department
City of Chula Vista Pollee Department
Walters Management
RHR Web Page
17-10
~
-
"-'-~-., '''''~"rt-',,,,,,''_~-''---- - ,--_..'""t-"~'.. W~.-.__~-,,;,-,r:.'.".. ._~.-,' "''',~''"'-''''''-'''''''''''''''',,""''"'
Srf r:'(;<C!rJh , '
f4fZ- 1l1A;C'/~ PAOI LU / / .
~ C!-lh 0eJ/A.-JiJCil.. ClJr,tM-Vj.5.'!A
We, the residents of Rolf/ng Hills RaJ
Chula Vista, California, to IMi\IEDI
"Truck Route" designation for the f
Road, ,Lane Avenue, and Hunte Park
PETITION
f? ES I DeNis
The decreased pedestrian safety, elev
property values (if YOU sell your hl
absolutely unacceptable.
Our website - www.rhriivinl!.com - E
to remain informed.
NAME
7}:; (h/f I'll, )/d; IPvt?u ~
.
/L Ql\Qu L,)o t:>>y~_
U~~ ~1/WJ'1.tlJ
" 'i<;Ift( ;~ilt?'1!~
Page I
Sr;:p I q j ~OO-/; ,
Foy:!. t1'v" o? PA{.)j~ . PETITION
'+ C-dt to)(ftt'~tL C II.J..A v~tfJ
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
(Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and r~fused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Ci}ula Vista ,,;,ho elected hil1l.}This was done without allowing any public comment.
-mE. VA-st-m/UoR.rfy of Rh-IZ RJE5iO!M7t5 H.4V/3. G~7iV 6:.dr,WGIJ Ff{N",fJ1:.iI:APFic (1AJ.mltVG pRc6fAo11
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell your home, you must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable. _ ,. . _ ,II _ j .,-.l.
WE HAVE A.SI<ED i ff/Jt1Hf Mty piLt flV AAI AccESS ReAOT/iilt-RlUV::, pw::'.A/.I.,/:=i- 10
, At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
~the right to spea, k in protest of the truck route designation. We wiII express our OPinion, s about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election. V' J
~ Sf? lJ.58tu.1'1 hi St- "f Obit /.6 Kf:-S KD A.3 iJ fJ &SI'-y"l,f Be --tt2.t[{:.tJ<o~ +- Ct Y
Our website - www.rhrlivinl!.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
B!{5f(0LL+e, 'IF'Iou-ocf\JtJf RiE50lV5 t-l-hs.J ;"UE b-h)L t<J#EflJi!-iE /;K!"SGt
'\Idf/J.A~ .::fWE. Ned ).OIYf.;, et-ESi:!itfufss
PHONE
~\)~ 0> -iJ ~"-', 2
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!!: Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chub Vista Mayor
and City Council to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21. 2006 Resolution approvin!!: a "Truck
Route" desi!!:nation for the followin!!: Rollin!!: Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley Road,
Lane venue and Hunte Parkway
~ay.p I Ct tv1('J i. V) cld CO"" P'
~lli p/ ~/h-'? u ~/
c;ll.en L-Clb,c'j AviJ"-EJlc
/h evviLJ
~
r4~
'ep,I\\< U\. \-\ i'7N~,'f
'l-L~ ~JV1---
l II/ (
.La..u< '-<- r 'L-J:'~
n ~
"-.J.-.-' . ')1-
C-+""~'--'" Jld6 "YL----
~A'MJ . ~
YvvAI}Jf /--M<A~V
r^ [CHeLt:, P /(.Aev,JAt tl
~wvvv~.,;) ~l. (d
"'~z.l
/r...--&....4't"YV
Continuation of signature page(s) to RoIling Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mayor
and City Council to IJ\iIMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a "Truck
Route" desi!!nation for the followin!! Rollin!! Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Vallev Road.
Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkwav
NAME
uJ, it; c.J...:.. t, 4'
/fyl@/),,- '/Y1'~
~~
j:;:-J!J- C"O/tJil
iSc U ,I' "
! - ._ I ~ \' _ ',' I
- r\;\I\i; i ~ \-t.....;jJ\i\).~_~
~~
(ll JiA :/ Ai \ tJ wJ.
~ C14Ft:
'ti /~ {J
ADDRESS
PHONE
^
(
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Bunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home, vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrlivine:.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAME
I . \
\..t\ iliA.',
ADDRESS
PHONE
C'
::/II ()o...;
~.~
19vr12--
15 OT(-IV-\
'A '
_.'-. 10
I-VlI C'"u F. L. 1.IJPi!.z
"_.-.........-""""-~..
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home, vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our web site - www.rhrlivin!!.com- enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAME
S!GNATURE
-:-~ -
ADDRESS
PRINTED NAME
& PHONE NO.
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to Il\ilMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Bills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hnnte Parkway.
EVERY MEM:BER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home. vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrlivinl!:.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAME (Signature)
CV\1 A,~':" C(l"1;h,....... /'7
~ /' 4.//
"~_' -eq/z-~?~/ j ,[:7 ^", '"-
'/C'- I
! / ~\ I
Lc~
"1- 0 J-' /'
(':; -t ,\". n -f'. \'0 ~,-(-/
!)h~~~~~~
\ "li l/;;J-
" /~~"'/~ ,~\L/'
.....,. 11
P~(~ Jpwce (1Cro
i/ . ' 11iiJ',.;tj-,crr>r v-/
i\-CLi'<:n 2'>o':'(yyj'S,
~F~'
/
f
ADDRESS
(Print Name) PHONE
/ .
V
/
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!!: Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mavor
and City Council to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21. 2006 Resolution annrovinl!: a "Truck
Route" desilroation for the followin!!: Rollin!!: Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Vallev Road.
Lane Avenue. and Hunte Parkway
NAME (Signature) ADDRESS (Print Name) PHONE
/Ntna r bak-ij-
Pw,!J,;H-G C,,-- \lA.\\.tLfY\..
----
! /"'ton+<: c .>t--'-Cyf1nf"''''
1~
.4,4 r0u.i:cv~,
',,\~ (yU\~
~ \L'i...Q.", \ U4\.\\J
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling mils Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home. vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chum Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrliviUlz.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chum Vista
to remain informed.
ADDRESS
PHONE
ClK
.~c: '
~~1cf~~
EiJ'i"lA\ H;o.-ft
~-/ / C/ 2~/ fl2ltTT
5ALJj~ff~ qr4W
~~ (/1;1 vJ u(UX,{
,,/Y?~ <<"<<vi
0."-,,;,'1"" '3,- Id,[I"C'~
\) ^ ~\\) ~'eJ JJ
I \ v, ! ~
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!!: Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mavor
and City Council to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21. 2006 Resolution aoorovin!!: a "Truck
Route" desil!llation for the followin!!: Rollin!!: Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Vallev Road.
Lane Avenue.. and Hunte Parkway
NAME
"'t!~,-,- .~, ~iJld/J
(./1 ~
/.. \L",,--/, \ ~
1/A:~7~ ~~'7
~{~
~'3~~
(lJ '~
~V fJd I u ~//I\'fl\.
..-.............l:j'~~
PHONE
CE,p /1 ~oC0
v I _ , I PETITION
Fo/2 mAjLJt:- PACIUA,
't- c:-, 11 C/!)uM::' it. elf 4A 0:sh1
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approviug a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
f? ES /0 GIVTS
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if you sell your home, YOU must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
Our website - www.rhrlivin!!:.com-enables residents ofRHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
\
NAlVIE -S)3 t'Jc;fL-{ (
'<"Of ~~
-,d~.
ili~ ;f~
I ,) 0/ ~
tZ-(.U)' / ()6
At. nnnvC'c
f, i~k._ >>t.m e.
~.
I -("~;f~
C J"t< (t\ t./; I)c .0
n -/;;7
IJ L.I..tl"""l lu;;....
,~~~J;~?J
) ,~-v6-
'.
"C<."" Uhl-\. {,t~2
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!! Hills Ranch ~, Petition to the Chula Vista Mavor
and City Council to IM:vI:EDIA TEL Y REVERSE the March 21. 2006 Resolution allllrOvin!! a "Truck
Route" designation for the followin!! Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley Road,
Lane Avenue an Hunte Parkwa
id
tf~~ /~tb t7. -- .
E I/s~ 13rIJwt!.r
Zl~bC
4J2
... T\.T\DIjlc.i;:
,), .L \ )
f \' \ l"-c- l'-Ic:t.01 e.-
PHONF.ootional _
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!!: Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mayor
and City Council to IMJVIEDIATEL Y REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approyin!!: a "Truck
Route" desi!!Uation for the followin!! Rollin!! Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley Road,
Lane Ayenue, and Hunte Parkway
NAM~
, r
'32"1
,', ~
. !29~i'/7 70)l'(,( YVe;
\ }tDU/O ~.f?Lu
'~~,
A.
~I
ADDRESS
1 PHONE optional
f' \,-, J) +- i\ In d. ._
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approvU;g a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home, vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrliving.com-enables residents ofRHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
1
I .
--('lAC ,I;' Ottl' fIAt
{J!;JIC-('~v;;~~
~\
, .' f{qf i JrI/l\v
- \S))r')~\i:1\:\\~~
\ I j
LL L1 . _ / td, ft,
/ ) ([
ADDRESS
A
PHONE
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rolling Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mayor
and City Council to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a "Truck
Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley Road,
Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkwav
~
<-1 A C~ /J. 11:, 5}'L-/j
/INJf2 ~LuR
~ ~~~~
,~.,_-:::~"JI.'" __
'--/ c~ ~
~h~
s;h~ Mf/1.-1L11A./0
J?~~~~~4<~{~
",-ju tQ ;/~I r;-fG~~
1/~..-r~ ~.?J.4t~
1 je;.
, he ~ pc- .
\ '\
.--r, "
!'-
0-
'ut~
k,-,~~tl
I1v.(;-Jer ~
~6~
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDL-'\TELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell your home, vou must disclose that these streets are tl'Uck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the tl'Uck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrlivin2.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAME
dnn~li'.""
PRONF.
"
. /lj~~L, )) /l!L('/\.e~-
S~'f ,'EJ? ~11 I
.' c<',) ~
~,-i....:m, :;~-":'f~'-<'- . j(' ~
~, t11 ii';.
, II~
/3ufN./ <z- pJ. .
. Q
.~ f:} (}<"y',-
PETITION
We, the supporters of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City
of Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home, vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
Our website - www.rhrlivinl!.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
ADDRESS
PHONE
(f\ 1 C. M.H:L G Ai. LA
f;:~ i (, tL- ~d
1=/0, -A'C:- J~
r~
/J
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21,2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if YOU sell your home. you must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrlivinl!:.com - enables residents ofRHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAJ'\1E
3M-A\.( fP-ANCI5<:~ \-h:Qr,J(.;;ND%
.i-J ..~ 1V~~ '
,/~,.tVn<v <'.1\.--"" ./
SU;;' itA tL tv;' LLe i2. 0Ue
A nnRRSS
PHONE
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the Chula Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell your home, you must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrliving.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
ADDRESS
PHONE
PETITION
We, the residents of Rolling Hills Ranch, do hereby petition the Mayor and City Council of the City of
Chula Vista, California, to IMMEDIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approving a
"Truck Route" designation for the following Rolling Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Valley
Road, Lane Avenue, and Hunte Parkway.
EVERY MEMBER of the ChuIa Vista City Council voted to designate these streets as truck routes.
Mayor Padilla abstained from voting and refused the opportunity to vote against this in support of the
people in East Chula Vista who elected him. This was done without allowing any public comment.
The decreased pedestrian safety, elevated noise level for homes bordering these streets, and decreased
property values (if vou sell vour home. vou must disclose that these streets are truck routes) are
absolutely unacceptable.
At the 8-22-06 Chula Vista City Council Meeting, the mayor and city council denied RHR residents
the right to speak in protest of the truck route designation. We will express our opinions about this
when we vote in the November 2006 election.
Our website - www.rhrliviUl!:.com - enables residents of RHR, East Chula Vista and West Chula Vista
to remain informed.
NAME
ADDRESS
PHONE
-~vy ",-,-,0 ull....
~iL'1 N , '--'V i L S0\~
A . v, x: 7 .:
\-}v>>v?-\.1i, ; . {( Ii l~
I
Continuation of signature page(s) to Rollin!! Hills Ranch Residents' Petition to the Chula Vista Mavor
and City Council to I~DIATELY REVERSE the March 21, 2006 Resolution approvin!! a "Truck
Route" desi!!nation for the followin!! Rollin!! Hills Ranch residential streets: Proctor Vallev Road.
Lane Avenue and Hu te Parkwa
ltL':'
".."""-
.. "/";':;'
;;iv,~
H
". ,...",;;;~,f~-u~