HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1984/04/24 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, April 24, 1984 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Scott, Malcolm,
Moore
~. Councilmembers absent: Councilmember McCandliss
Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron,
i, Assistant City Manager Asmus
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment
of silent prayer.
1. APPR0VAL OF MINUTES for the meetings of April 17, 1984
MSUC (Moore/Scott) to approve the minutes.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
-- a. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING APRIL 29 MAY 5, 1984 AS "RESPECT FOR LAW
I WEEK"
The Proclamation was presented to Mr. A1 Monahart, President of the Donira
Optimist Club.
b. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF MAY 1 - MAY 8, 1984 AS "YOUTH WEEK"
The Proclamation was presented to Robert Phelps, Lecturing Knight and his
Youth Chairman.
c. PROCLAMATION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF APRIL 22 THROUGH APRIL 28, 1984 AS
"NATIONAL SECRETARIES WEEK"
The Proclamation was presented to Adele Sarmiento, Secretary to the
Redevelopment Agency/Community Development Director for the City of Chula
Vista.
3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY
Cerulo Hernandez, Jr.,133 N. Belmont, National City, CA 92050
City Council Meeting - 2 - April 24, 1984
A claim was filed in the amount of $5,000 for alleged sustained personal
injuries as a result of a choke hold placed on the claimant by a Chula Vista
Police Officer which occurred at a high school basketball game during which
claimant was arrested for fighting in public and resisted arrest. In order to
commence the statute of 1 imitations, it was recemn~nded by the Risk Management
staff and the City Attorney that this claim be rejected by Council.
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to reject the claim.
b. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PARKING FEES ON PARKWAY AND THIRD AVENUE ON MAY 5,
FOR HEALTH FAIR (American Red Cross)
The American Red Cross Health Fair will be held on Saturday, May 5, 1984 at
the Parkway Community Center and has requested suspension of parking fees in
the vicinity of Parkway and 3rd Avenue on that date.
City Manager Goss recommended staff be directed to:
(a) not enforce the time limitation on the parking spaces on Park Way
bet~een Third and Fourth Avenue in the two hour zone;
(b) suspend enforcement on the parking meters along Third Avenue between
"F" and "G" Streets and the six meters on Parkway just west of Third
Avenue and;
(c) arrange to have ten spaces temporarily reserved at the Parkway
Community Center parking lot for handicapped with signs and
barricades to be provided.
MSUC (Malcol m/Moore) to accept the staff recommendations.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION TO REZONE 3.75 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD AND MELROSE AVENUE
FROM R-1 TO R-3-P-14 ALANDA-BACH (Director of
Planning)
a. ORDINANCE AMENDING ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING
3.75 ACRES AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TELEGRAPH
CANYON ROAD AND MELROSE AVENUE FROM R-1 TO R-3-P-14-
FIRST READING
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public
hearing.
The applicant has submitted a preliminary plan for the development of 48
condominium units on the subject property (a density of 13.8 units per net
acre). The plan shows 8 two-story residential structures, 4 single-story
garage structures and a cul-de-sac (turnaround area with 26-foot radius at the
terminus of Myra Avenue and Maria Way).
City Council Meeting - 3 - April 24, 1984
After weighing the arguments for and against, the Planning Department and the
Planning Commission determined the reasons for rezoning the property outweigh
the arguments against the proposed rezoning. Development of the vacant land
would complete the street improvements and improve traffic safety .in the
area.
Councilman Moore stated he is abstaining because of a potential conflict of
interest. City Attorney Harron explained the rezoning could have a material
effect upon the residence of Councilman Moore who resides approximately
one-half mile from the proposed project. Under the "unpublished opinions" of
the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) criteria is established for (1)
the proximity of the applicant's property and (2) what an appraiser's view of
the development would be regarding its effect on the Councilmember's
residence. City Attorney Harron stated he will request an opinion from the
FPPC on this case.
MSUC (Malcolm/Scott) to continue this public hearing for one week to May 1.
Councilman Moore abstained.
5. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDER REQUEST FOR DEFERRAL OF UNDERGROUNDING
UTILITY SERVICES TO 510 OTIS STREET (City Engineer)
RESOLUTION 11597 APPROVING DEFERRAL OF UNDERGROUNDING UTILITY SERVICES
AT 510 OTIS STREET
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public
hearing.
City Engineer Lippitt explained the City Code requirements for all new
structures, except for room additions or single family dwellings, be served by
underground utilities. The owner of the property at 510 Otis Street is adding
a second dwelling unit to the existing house. This constitutes the
requirement to place all existing overhead utilities underground. The owner
has requested a deferral of the undergrounding requirements.
The City Engineer showed a slide of the applicant's home reporting that the
benefits derived from enforcing the undergrounding requirements do not
out~eigh the cost and possible future maintenance problems caused by the work
in this area. He recommended approval of the request with the condition the
owner not protest in case an undergrounding district is formed.
There being no comments, either for or against, the public hearing was
declared closed.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
a. Earl B. Johnson, 250 Bonita Glen Drive, Apt D-7, Chula Vista, and Sam j.
Zail, 1691-F Melrose Way, Chula Vista spoke against the City leasing the
golf course to a private business enterprise. They supported having City
City Council Meeting -- 4 - April 24, 1984
crews maintain the course noting that free advice on maintaining the
greens could be received from entities such as agricultural schools.
Mr. Johnson indicated that May 8 is the date that RFP's will be
considered. Mayor Cox stated it would not be that date; however, when
the date is known, a notice will be posted at the golf course.
CONSENT CALENDAR ( Items 7-10)
MSUC IMalcolm/Moore) to approved the Consent Calendar
7. RESOLUTION 11598 APPROVING ENCROACHMENT PERMIT rE034 AT 310 SURREY
DRIVE - ANTHONY AND ESTHER D'ANCHISE (City Engineer}
Anthony and Esther D'Anchise, owners of the subject property have applied for
an encroachment permit to construct a wooden deck which would extend into the
City's open space lot approximately 8 feet.
The Department of Parks and Recreation has reviewed the request and found this
proposed encroachment would not obstruct the view of any of the neighboring
residents or interfere with the purpose of this open space. The City Engineer
recommended a condition of approval of the permit to be that any relocation of
the irrigation line would be the applicant's responsibility.
Councilman Scott questioned granting an encroachment permit to the property
owners rather than deeding the property to them and getting the taxes from
it. Councilman Malcolm noted this would be a possessDry interest in the
property and the Assessor would go out assess the property and tax the
property owner accordingly. City Engineer Lippitt stated there is a hold
harmless clause in the resolution.
8. ORDINANCE 2066 AMENDING SECTION 3.45.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO WAIVE
FEES SET FORTH IN THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE - FIRST
READING (City Attorney)
The City Code does not presently allow for the waiver of any fees. The
proposed amendment would give the City Council the flexibility to waive fees
where it feels it is appropriate to do so. Charitable events run by nonprofit
organizations, promotional events and similar activities would be able to
operate without the necessity of paying a fee if Council acts to waive the fee
for their benefit.
9. 9RDINANCE 2067 REPEALING CHAPTER 5.16 AND AMENDING SECTION 5.40.020
OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
AUCTIONS AND PEDDLERS - FIRST READING (City Attorney)
The Chula Vista Municipal Code contains a comprehensive regulatory scheme with
regard to auctions. All of these regulations are now preempted. The repeal
of Chapter 5.16 will bring the Municipal Code into compliance with the state
law which prohibits cities from regulating in this area with the exception
that cities are allowed to continue charging a business license tax.
City Council Meeting - 5 - April 24, 1984
lOa. RESOLUTION 11599 ACCEPTING GRANTS OF EASEMENT FOR STREET PURPOSES AND
FOR TREE PLANTING AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES
(Continued from April t7 meeting) (City Enginer)
b. RESOLUTION 11600 APPROVING THE AGREEMENTS WITH WILLIAM P. LEE RELATIVE
TO HOLDING THE CITY HARMLESS, PAYMENT OF FEES AND
UNDERGROUNDING OF UTILITIES
c. RESOLUTION 11601 APPROVING THE AGREEMENT WITH WILLIAM P. LEE RELATIVE
TO LUMP SUM PAYMENTS OF MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF
THE PUMP STATION THE DEVELOPMENT IS USING AND A
REPAYMENT OF CONSTRUCTION COST OF SAID PUMP STATION
As conditions of approval of Tentative Parcel Map 84-3, the owner, William P.
Lee, was required to grant easements for street and street tree purposes.
Additional conditions of approval required the owner to enter into an
agreement to pay: Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer fees; East "H" Street development
fees; a pro-rata share of maintenance and operation costs for the sewer pump
station to which the development connects; a pro-rata share of the cost of
constructing said pump station; and a hold-harmless agreement should the pump
station fail.
The entities required to execute the agreements and easements have done so.
All items have been checked by the City and found to be acceptable.
This item was continued from the meeting of Apri~ 17, 1983, in order for staff
to supply Council with additional cost information for this project.
In answer to Councilman Malcolm's question, City Engineer Lippitt explained
the cost was $50 per square foot for a total of $300,000.
End of Consent Calendar
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
ll. REPORT TAX EXEMPT FINANCING FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT (Community Development Director)
a. RESOLUTION 11602 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR MULTI-FAMILY
RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS BY MORGAN GARDNER
SUBDIVISION
b. RESOLUTION 11603 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE
~.' PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR MULTI-FAMILY
~ RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENT BY TERRA NOVA ASSOCIATES
c. RESOLUTION 11604 AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS FOR THE
PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR MULTI-FAMILY
RENTAL HOUSING DEVELOPMENTS BY APPEL DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
City Council Meeting -6 - April 24, 1984
On June 28, 1983, the City Council amended the Industrial Development
Authority Ordinance to allow issuance of multi-family mortgage revenue bonds
as a tool to promote affordable housing. The Council asked that a policy be
formulated to apply to such financing assistance.
Staff has submitted the proposed policy which, in summary, requires:
1. Twenty percent of the units be affordable as under Federal regulation.
2. Bond financed projects to limit rents on affordable units to thirty
percent of the monthly income of households at 80% of median income,
adjusted for bedroom size.
3. Term of rental and affordability to be equal to the bond term, except
that the minimum term is 20 years. If the bond term is less than 20
years, but at least lO years, allow for a waiver of the term of rental
and affordability after expiration of the bond if the proper%y owner
demonstrates to the City Council that no comparable rates are available
for refinancing and that comparable financing would be required to
maintain project feasibility.
4. The developer to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with the City which
would require the property owner to submit semi-annual certified rent
roles which reveal rent rates and household income for all affordable
units, to agree to an audit at owner's cost if the City feels an audit
is indicated by review of the rent role, and to retain for each
affordable-unit occupancy a tenant income declaration sheet and certain
income verifications as required by the City.
The projects requested for the issuance of the revenue bonds are
Morgan-Gardner Subdivision, Terra Nova Associates and Appel Development
Corporation.
Councilman Scott stated he is abstaining from Item No. ll and lla due to a
possible conflict of interest.
Mr. Alan Perry, 1900 Central Tower, San Diego, representing Morgan and Gardner
asked to have No. 3 of the Policy rewritten as follows:
"However, where the developer provides for rentals lower than called for
in this policy or provides a greater number of low/moderate units than
called for in this policy or makes other concessions in providing
affordable housing, the City Council may agree to a term of affordability
commitment of less than 20 years but not less than lO years nor less than
the term of the bonds".
Mr. Perry stated this is a Federal requirement and without this particular
change his client may not be able to go through with his concessions. His
client has committed rentals to be held at 25% and not 30% of income level and
although State law requires 75-units to be low-and-mederate-income units, his
cl lent is proposing 94-units.
City Council Meeting - 7 - April 24, 1984
Council discussion followed with Housing Coordinator Gustarson explaining
staff's recommendation; the Federal requirement; density bonus offered to the
developer; devel oper 's commitment to hold the units for a longer period of
time for rental. Councilman Malcolm requested Councilman Scott to come back
to the dais at this time in order to be included in the discussion of the
policy. Councilman Scott stated that if he has a potential conflict of
interest on lla (he feels a moratorium is needed), he would certainly have
one on the general policy. If he voted to say that, it could kill the
project; therefore, he is still abstaining due to a possible conflict of
interest. Councilman Malcolm spoke in support of the lO year requirement
rather than the 20 years requirement stating the government has scrutinized
the issuance of Industrial Development Bonds (IDB) to the point where they
felt they should be disbanded. However, after a debate, Congress decided the
IDB's were an integral part of the economy and should not be disbanded.
MS (Malcolm/Moore) to change Policy No. 3 to a minimal term of lO years as the
US Government has demanded of cities.
Housing Coordinator Gustafson asked for clarification of the motion at which
time Councilman Malcolm changed the motion to state it was his intent that the
developers would have the opportunity to change providing financing is
repaid." If after lO years, they want to terminate the agreement with the
City, at that time, the bonds would have to be paid-in-full - no subsidy from
the government taxpayers would be involved.
co.cilman scott returned
Discussion ensued as to a afo . .
on construction or occupancy of the units; Councilman Malcolm included in his
motion they should start from the first day of occupancy of the'first unit and
~ he would amend the motion accordingly. Councilman Moore agreed to the
amendment.
Clarification of the motion:
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to change number 3 of the policy to be a minimum of
lO-years from the date of the occu ancy of the first unit - to require the
term of rental and availability to ~e equal
to t e bond term except a minimum
of lO years - if it is a 20 year bond, it would be a minimum of lO years; as
long as the bond is outstanding, they wo~ld be required to continue with the
low and moderate income units.
Mr. Perry asked that it be changed to state the time would start from the
Certificate of Occupancy rather than the date of occupancy of the first unit.
Councilman Malcolm stated he would change the motion accordingly. Councilman
Moore agreed to the second. The motion carried unanimously.
Councilman Moore asked that this policy be rewritten and be given to the
Council. Mayor Cox questioned whether the same requirement would be
applicable to items llb and llc.
City Council Meeting - 8 - April 24, 1984
Councilman Scott came back to the dais at this time stating he disagreed with
the action taken on the policy. When issuing IDB's, the City is giving
extraordinary benefits and therefore 20 years is a reasonable time to get
low-and-moderate income housing for Chula Vista. When the Council authorized
lO years, it is cutting this in half. Councilman Scott added a developer
should be given 20 years and, if he feels it is not feasible, then it is his
(developer's) decision. He added that a policy such as this which has such
tremendous impact should not be made with only three Councilmembers present.
It should be made with a full Council.
Mayor Cox suggested this policy be discussed at a Council Conference. City
Manager Goss stated the next Conference is scheduled for May 19; however, it
is a full Conference and the Council will not have time to discuss this
issue.
RESOLUTIONS llb AND llc OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the texts were
waived by ~nanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Scott voting "no".
Councilman Malcolm reiterated his statement that lO years was a significant
length of time. He noted.other projects built 20 years ago which are in a
MSUC (Scott/Malcolm) to look at this policy in more detail with a full Council
present.
Councilman Scott asked that a report come back regarding Councilman Malcolm's
statement of projects in a "state of~epair" those done with municipal
bonds. Community Development Director Desrochers indicated Councilman Malcolm
was referring to the 236-units built in the City 15 years ago. Councilman
Malcolm indicated he would 1 ike to see pictures taken of the various projects
to be shown at this particular Conference to see what has been happening.
MSC (Cox/Malcolm) the intent of the motion is that policy items l, 2 and 4 v
would also apply' to Resolutions llb and llc (on this agenda} as well as lla.
Councilman Scott abstained from voting.
Mayor Cox asked the City Manager to schedule this for a Council Conference and
report back to the Council on the date.
12. RESOLUTION 11605 AUTHORIZING PURCHASE OF A STEEL ROLLER IN LIEU OF A
BUDGETED DUMP TRUCK, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONll~ACT FOR THE STEEL ROLLER {A:ting Director of
Public Works Operations/Purchasing Agent)
Funds were requested in the FY 1983-84 Street Operations budget to purchase a
dump truck After the budget request was approved by Council a PAPE study of
the truck fleet was started and problems with one of the Division's two steel
roll ors surfaced.
City Council Meeting - 9 - April 24, 1984
Since steel rollers are essential items of road maintenance equipment and the
truck study indicated that a new truck is not essential at this time, Council
approval to substitute the purchase of a steel roller in lieu of the budgeted
dump truck is being requested. Also being requested is Council's acceptance
of the bids and award of contract for the purchase of a new steel roller.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
13a. RESOLUTION 11606 APPROVING AGREEMENT BEIWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO FOR AUTOMATIC AID FIRE
SERVICE (Director of Public Safety)
b. RESOLUTION 11607 APPROVING AGREEI4ENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY FOR AUTOMATIC AID FIRE
SERVICE
In an effort to reduce costs and improve level of service, South Bay fire
departments have entered into automatic aid agreements and consolidated fire
dispatching in the Chula Vista Communications Center. The Director of Public
Safety recommended this trend be continued by entering into automatic aid
agreements with San Diego and National City. These agreements will result in
the following advantages: improve response time, enhance cooperation and
effectiveness and a decrease in overtime expenditures.
Councilman Scott noted automatic aid is now becoming a common practice among
cities and discussed the contract the City has with Bonita/Sunnyside
District. He questioned why the City would be paying the Bonita/Sunnyside
District to take care of certain areas within the City boundaries if they are
now under this particular automatic aid agreement. He felt this should be
investigated and, if appropriate, notice should be given to the
Bonita/Sunnyside Fire District. The District is going to an election in June
asking for additional funds; therefore, this would be timely.
RESOLUTIONS OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the texts were waived
by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
MSUC (Scott/Moore) for a report back on what the City should do and how it
(automatic aid} fits into the total scheme for both the Bonita/Sunnyside and
Montgomery Fire Districts,
14. RESOLUTION 11608 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO AND MONTGOMERY SANITATION
DISTRICT FOR TEMPORARY CONNECTION AND SEWAGE
TRANSPORTATION (City Engineer)
In December 1983, City Council approved an agreement with San Diego,
Montgomery Sanitation District, Otay Water District and Otay International
Center authorizing construction and operation of the Otay Mesa Sewer and
temporary use by San Diego of the Date-Faivre Trunk Sewer.
_ City Council Meeting - lO - April 24, 1984
Developers of a property (Palm PaCifica) not within the stipulated area of
service have requested permission to utilize a portion of the capacity
provided under the Otay International Center agreement. Both San Diego and
the Montgomery Sanitation District staffs have recommended approval of the
requested service. This agreement does not increase the capacity in the
=- Date-Faivre sewer designated for temporary use by properties within San.
Diego. Upon completion of the Otay Mesa Sewer this and other properties
within San Diego will be disconnected from the Date-Faivre sewer and connected
, to the Otay Mesa Sewer.
Councilman Moore questioned why the City is the first party to this agreement
inasmuch as it is the one providing the service. City Engineer Lippitt
responded the reason Chula Vista is the first is because it has the right to
say o and the matter will stop there and go no further. What the City is
doing is 1 easing the capacity through this arrangement until San Diego bull ds
its own line in order to serve that area to the southeast.
In answer to Councilman Moore's question, Mr. Lippitt stated once the capacity
reaches a certain depth of flow, the City would not just automatically cut it
off. Under the terms of the agreement San Diego must build a parallel line
and they would have one year in order to do this.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text was waived
by unanimous consent.
Councilman Scott noted he voted against the temporary usage of the capacity.
He felt it was an extremely important bargaining aspect for the City to have.
Council man Malcolm discussed cooperating with the City of San Diego in working
with these agreements.
The Resolution passed with Councilman Scott voting "no".
15. RESOLUTION 11609 GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO MR. MICHAEL WHEELER,
1097 OLEANDER TO ABATE A NUISANCE (Director of
Building and Housing)
Mr. Wheeler, 1097 Oleander Avenue, violated the Chula Vista Municipal Code by
remodeling and adding an addition to the dwelling he occupied without first
submitting plans and obtaining permits to do the construction. On
September 13, 1983, Mr. Wheel er appeared before the City Council to request
additional time be granted for him to abate the nuisance.
The Director of Building and Housing recommended granting an additional time
of 48 days from March 14 to May 1 to complete the work at 1097 Oleander.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
City Council Meeting -ll April 24, 1984
16. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. City Manager Goss submitted reprints of the San Diego magazine article
on Chula Vista and noted the publicity given to the chip seal program in
the American City and County magazine.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
17. REPORT REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES TO DESIGN
' REMODELING NORTH END OF CITY HALL IDirector of Building
and Housing)
Director of Building and Housing Grady explained that at its December 9, 1982
meeting, the City Council directed staff to bring back a plan consolidating
clerical staff and renovating the north end of City Hall. The Council set up
a task force consisting of the Mayor, one Councilmember, City Manager, City
Attorney, City Clerk and Director of Building and Housing to review various
alternatives for remodel ing.
At the Council Conference of December 9, 1982 three construction alternatives
were presented to Council. Council selected Alternative "C" as the conceptual
plan that provides for clustering of the clerical staffs of the Mayor/Council,
City Clerk and City Attorney, moves the City Attorney and his staff, and moves
Councilmembers desks from the Council Conference area.
It is staff's intent to receive proposals and return to Council with a
resolution to hire architectural services to prepare plans and specifications
for remodel ing.
Director of Building and Housing Grady submitted a sketch of the proposed plan
indicating where changes have been made.
MSUC (Scott/Cox) to accept the staff recommendation to proceed with the
RFP 's.
18. MAYOR'S REPORT
a. MSUC (Scott/Moore) for a Closed Session for litigation after the
Redevelopmerit Agency meeting.
b. Mayor Cox noted the two propositions (Nos. 18 and 19) on the june
Ballot. One is for 370 million dollars, the other for $85 million
dollars to be taken out of General Obligation Bonds for State and local
park acquisition and development of wild life habitats. He felt Chula
Vista could benefit substantially from these funds.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to ask the Legislative Committee to look at these two bond
issues and come back to the Council with a recommendation at the next
meeting. Councilman Moore asked the report to include how the bonds would be
paid off.
City Council Meeting - 12 - April 24, 1984
c. Mayor Cox discussed AB 3461 which is a bill regarding infra structures
(revitalization districts bill).
MSUC (Cox/Moore) to ask the Legislative Committee to look at this and come
back to Council with a recommendation.
d. Mayor Cox noted a letter he received from Mr. Dotson of Caltrans
regarding the 1-805/Bonita Road improvements. Mr. Dotson indicated that
modifications to the 1-805 south offramps would be made by late summer to
coincide with the Bonita G1 en traffic signal. City Engineer Lippitt
noted the "170 traffic controller" is in the design of the
signalizatien.
19. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. Councilman Malcolm noted Mr. Patrick Kru rer, representing the Tetra Nova
development was in the audience this evening. He is a member of the
Federal Home Loan Banking Association on the Governor's Housing and
Finance Committee and on the President's Committee on Housing and
Finance. Mr. Krurer. would be happy to come to the Council Conference
and discuss IDB bonds with the Council.
The Council recessed at 9:08 p.m. to the Redevelopmerit Agency meeting and
reconvened at 9:12 p.m.
ADJOURhMENT AT 9:40 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for May 1, 1984 at 7:00 p.m.
I ~kFULASZ, CMC ~J
WPG:0420C
PAG