HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1996/01/16
"l~~::,," ~.~."
.,'.' i;,,;";t I [to'!
c.
; ;, :~ ::;,~
[:
,'! :.j;.; .!' (:::::"t
Tuesday, January 16, 1996
6:00 p.m.
~,::, '')'~ gl'd""GC:,: ......Jl ,liJ u~ Cd::;, i-iei; Oil
, '; '.2k S' ','-, S/)~..
,-',' . ,n ,:. " " ,'~ ( .
" , -'" ,-" "...-
,_. -.--. --' ;/ . ...-
Re"ular Meetin" of the City of Chula Vista Cf;y Council
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Alevy _' Moot _' Padilla _' Rindone _' and
Mayor Horton _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
January 9, 1996 (City Council) and January 9, 1996 (Joint Meeting of
the City CouncilfRedeyelopment Agency).
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Proclamation honoring the San Diego Mediation Center. The proclamation will be presented by
Mayor Pro Tern Moot to Liz O'Brien, President of the San Diego Mediation Center.
*****
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting.
Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However,
final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through JO)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete
the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to
the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and
Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no reportahle actions taken in Closed
Session on 1/9/96. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed.
Agenda
-2-
January 16, 1996
b. Letter from O.D. Cooper requesting drainage repair at 724, 745 and 749 Riverlawn. It is
recommended that staff advise Mr. Cooper that they will be reviewing this project as part of the
fiscal year J 996/97 CIP budget preparation and will report back to Council on this project at that
time.
c. Letter from Richard Schubert requesting additional bus stops and a change in Route 932 and
29. It is recommended that the letter be referred to staff.
6. ORDINANCE 2660 AMENDING SECTION 10.48.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE,
INCREASED SPEED LIMITS IN CERTAIN ZONES, SCHEDULE IX,
AND AFFIRMING TRIAL TRAFFIC REGULATION NUMBER 140 FOR
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON FIITH A VENUE FROM NAPLES
STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE, AND ON FAIVRE STREET FROM
BROADWAY TO THE CUL-DE-SAC WEST OF JACQUA STREET (first
readiUl!) - In July 1994, the City Engineer determined the need to establish a
30 MPH speed limit on Fifth Avenue between Naples Street and Orange
Avenue, and on Faivre Street between Broadway and the Cul-de-Sac west of
Jacqua Street. A traffic and engineering study was conducted by staff and it was
determined that the speed limit of 30 MPH was the appropriate speed limit on
the two streets. The speed limits have been in effect for eight months and action
by Council will make these speed limits permanent. Staff recommends Council
place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Public Works)
7. RESOLUTION 18180 APPROVING AMENDMENT AND RENEWAL OF THE CITY'S LEASE
AGREEMENT WITH JORGE V ALERDI, TRUSTEE, IDM LEASING
DIVISION FOR 311 "F" STREET TELECENTER - In December 1994,
Council approved a one year lease agreement for the downtown telecenter.
Action by Council would extend the existing lease for one year. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Environmental Resources Manager)
8. RESOLUTION 18174 APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR EAST ORANGE
AVENUE INFILTRATION BASIN WITH THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO,
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE, AND EASTLAKE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - The agreement provides for the permanent
maintenance of the East Orange A venue infiltration basin. It designates the
parties responsible for maintenance of the basin, and identifies the open space
maintenance district assessments as the mechanism for financing permanent
maintenance. Staff recommends Council continue this item. (Director of Public
Works) Continued from the meeting of l/9/96.
9. RESOLUTION 18181 ACCEPTING BID AND A W ARDlNG CONTRACT FOR
"CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK RAMPS ON VARIOUS STREETS IN
PREPARATION FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 OVERLAY
PROGRAM IN THE CITY (STL-224)" - On 12/13/95, sealed bids were
received for removal of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, as well as construction
of pedestrian ramps on various streets in the City. The total number of ramps
to be constructed is 125. Staff recommends approval of the resolution awarding
the contract to Portillo Concrete, Chula Vista in the amount of $55,781.
(Director of Public Works)
Agenda
-3-
January 16, 1996
10. RESOLUTION 18182 ENDORSING THE APPOINTMENT OF CURT STEPHENSON OF
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BY THE SAN DIEGO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (SDEDC) TO THE
SDEDC BOARD OF DIRECTORS - In the Memorandum of Understanding
between the City and San Diego Economic Development Corporation, it states
that the City may have representation on the SDEDC Board of Directors. The
SDEDC currently has an opening and would like to appoint Curt Stephenson,
Executive Vice President of the EastLake Development Company, as the Chula
Vista representative. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Community Development)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to
speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete
the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per
individual.
11.
PUBLIC HEARING
REVIEWING AND ADOPTING THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN AND COUNTYWIDE
SUMMARY PLAN AND SITING ELEMENT - Staff recommends the public
hearing be continued to the meeting of 2/13/96. (Conservation Coordinator)
Continued from the meeting of 12/19/95.
12.
PUBLIC HEARING
CONSIDERING ENACTING NEW GAMING PLAN POLICIES AND
PROCEDURES REGARDING CARDROOM ORDINANCE 5.20 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE - On 11/21/95, Council received a staff report concerning
proposed amendments to the gaming ordinance. The proposal recommended that
the Municipal Code be changed to allow any form of gambling that is allowed
within the state. A gaming plan must be adopted outlining specifics associated
with wagering. The recommendations and alternatives identified were the result
of a review of the gaming policies of other jurisdictions in the region and staff
analysis associated with the City's cardroom procedures. Staff recommends the
public hearific he continued to the meetinc of 1/23/96. (Chief of Police)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the
Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally
prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to
address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications
Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
Agenda
-4-
January 16, 1996
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
13. RESOLUTION 18183 OPPOSING PROPOSITION 199: LIMITS ON MOBILEHOME RENT
CONTROL LOW-INCOME RENTAL ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE
STATUTE (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MOBILEHOME RENT
ASSIST ANCE, MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL RESTRICTION.) - On
11/23/95, the Housing Assistance Commission voted unanimously to oppose
Proposition 199, Mobilehome Rent Assistance, Mobilehome Rent Control
Restrictions. On 12/12/95. the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission opposed
the same Proposition by a majority vote. It is recommended that Council
approve the resolution. (Housing Assistance Commission and Mobilehome Rent
Control Commission)
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by
the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council
and staff recommendations nwy in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please
fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to five minutes.
14. RESOLUTION 18173 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH EYE/COMM, INC. FOR PRINTING
OF SEWER BILLS AND MAILING SERVICES FOR SEWER BILLS AND
OTHER CITY MAIL - In accordance wilh Council direction, staff circulated
a Request for Proposals (RFP) for printing and mailing services for sewer
billing. In an effort to reduce City expenses, as well as to improve the level of
service on daily mailing, other mailing services were included in the RFP and
in the proposed contract with Eye/Comm, Inc. Staff recommends approval of
the resolution. (Director of Public Works and Director of Finance) Continued
from the meeting of 1/9/96.
15. RESOLUTION 18184 APPROPRIATING $3,100 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE
OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR THE INSTALLATION OF AN ALL-
WAY STOP AND PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AT THE INTERSECTION OF
TERRA NOVA DRIVE/BEACON PLACE/WEST VIEW DRIVE - The
Traffic Engineer has received a petition with 56 signatnres requesting an all-way
stop and crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive at either the intersection
of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon PlacefWestview Drive. Both the Safety
Commission and City staff opposed installing an all-way stop. Therefore, under
the Council delegation authority for traffic related items, the report is to be
heard by Council. Staff recommends Council not approve the resolution.
(Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required.
Agenda
-5-
January 16, 1996
16.A. REPORT DENIAL OF REQUEST BY ELITE RACING FOR REIMBURSEMENT
FOR A BICYCLING EVENT "TOUR DE SOUTH COUNTY" HELD ON
JULY 16, 1995 - In February 1994, Elite Racing, a professional "for profit"
sports marketing and management company, sent a request to the City to fund
a bicycling event for the South County, the "Tour de South County, rr in the
amount of $12,000 in sponsorship support and $3,000 for in-kind benefits.
Funding was approved at a joint Council/Agency meeting on March 23, 1994.
For this year's event, all parties involved agreed to provide in-kind staff support
for the event but a formal contract was never executed by either party. Elite
Racing is now coming forth requesting reimbursement in the amount of $12,000
in sponsorship support and $3,000 for in-kind benefits. Staff does not
recommend funding, however, if it is Council's desire to provide a donation, the
Council may approve the resolution. (Director of Community Development and
Director of Parks and Recreation)
B. RESOLUTION 18185 AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION OF $12,000 FOR A DONATION
TO ELITE RACING FOR REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE "TOUR DE
SOUTH COUNTY" - 4/5th's vote required.
17. REPORT EASTLAKE PARK ISSUES - The report addresses an unresolved park issue
associated with the processing of amendments to the EastLake Greens Public
Facilities Financing Plan (as identified in the GDP/SPA Plan Amendment). The
main focus of the report is to ensure that the community center identified in the
EastLake Park Agreement is financed and constructed by the EastLake
Development Company. (Director of Parks & Recreation) Continued from the
meeting of 12/19/95.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers.
Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTISI
a. Scheduling of meetings.
b. Department Head 'presentation:
Mana,gement Services;
Buildmg and Housing;
Community Development; and
Public Works.
19. MAYOR'S REPORTISl
a. Youth Commission vacancies.
20. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on January 23, 1996
at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council
Meeting.
Agenda
-6-
January 16, 1996
*' * * *' *
CLOSED SESSION
Unless the City Allorney, the City MalUlger or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permilled by law to be the subject of a closed
session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protectthe
interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of filUlI action
taken in closed session, and the voles taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed
sessions, the videotaping will be termilUlted at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from
closed session, reports of filUlI action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
21. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING - Existing litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
. Chammas vs. the City of Chula Vista
. Trinidad De La Rosa vs. the City of Chula Vista
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
. Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive
Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of
Engineers (WCE) , Police Officers Association (POA) and International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF).
Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
22. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
*****
January 4, 1996
MEMO TO:
Vicki Soderquist, Deptuy City Clerk
FROM:
Patricia Salvacion, Mayor/Council office
SUBJECT:
PROCLAMATION FOR THE SAN DIEGO MEDIATION CENTER
On January 16, 1996, under Special Orders of the Day, Deputy Mayor Moot would like
to announce the opening of a South Bay Mediation Center, and issue a proclamation
honoring the San Diego Mediation Center.
Liz O'Brien, President of the San Diego Mediation Center will be accepting the
proclamation.
)). -,J
/ <-L.
January 11, 1996
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John D. Goss, city Manager~
City Council Meeting of January 1996
TO:
SUBJECT:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular
City Council meeting of Tuesday, January 16, 1996. Comments
regarding the written ~ommunications are as follows:
Sa. This is a letter from the City Attorney reporting that there
were no observed reportable actions taken in Closed Session on
1/9/96.
5b. This is a letter from Mr. o. D. Cooper of 767 Riverlawn Avenue
requesting that drainage be repaired at 724 and 745-749
Riverlawn. Mr. Cooper indicated that it has taken five years
to get anything done. The Operations Division of Public Works
was advised of this problem by Mr. Cooper some time in the
past. However, this problem appeared to be no more severe
than other minor drainage problems throughout the city and was
beyond the ability of the Operations Division to do as an in-
house project. They also did not concur that the severity of
the problem was as great as Mr. Cooper indicated since the
water only stands about an inch or two deep. When Mr. Cooper
wrote this letter, the Engineering Division looked at it along
with a couple of other small problems of a similar nature
throug'lout the City and believed that the work could be
accomplished more cost effectively by combining it with those
other minor drainage projects. The problem is two-fold.
First, the curb and gutter in front of these residences has
apparently settled. Second, the cross gutter, which takes the
water away from the sunken gutter is also too high. In order
to repair the problem completely, both the curb and gutter in
front of the residences and the cross gutter need to be
replaced. Therefore, staff is reviewing the project as part
of the CIP Budget preparation along with budget priorities and
available funding. While this is considered very minor
compared against our other needs, the cost of the repair work
is also relatively small, but the repair should be done along
with other work in order to accomplish it in a cost effective
manner. THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT STAFF ADVISE MR.
COOPER THAT THEY WILL BE REVIEWING THIS PROJECT AS PART OF THE
FY 96/97 CIP BUDGET PREPARATION AND WILL REPORT BACK TO THE
COUNCIL ON THIS PROJECT AT THAT TIME.
5c. This is a letter from Mr. Richard Schubert regarding changes
to Chula vista Transit stops as well as changes in Routes 932
and 29. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE LETTER BE REFERRED TO
STAFF.
Please note that the following departments will be making
budget presentations at the January 16, 1996 meeting:
Management Services
Building , Housing
Community Development
Public Works
Attached are copies of the graphics used in last week's budget
presentations by Library, Parks and Recreation, Personnel and
police. Also included is information, where available, for
the presentations being made at Tuesday'S meeting.
JDG:mab
Attachments
~~~
~
~~~~
~-_....."'-
CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date:
January 10, 1996
From:
The Honorable Mayor and city cou~'
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney \
~
Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 1/9/96
To:
Re:
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session of January 9,
1996, there were no actions taken which are required under the
Brown Act to be reported.
BMB:lgk
C:\lt\clossess.no
,../' /)
,t) tl.. -- I
276 FOURTH AVENUE. CHULA VISTA' CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5037' FAX (619) 585-5612
Ptnw.-..~P~
Mayor Horton
City Councilmembers
276 4th Avenue
Chula vista CA 91910
January 3, 1996 00 ~ill~DW~ ~.
.MN - 5 l!Rl
COUNCil OffiCES
CHULA VISTA. CA
I am writting this letter on advise of your staff. We have tried
for over five years to get the drainage repaired at 724 Riverlawn
and 745 Riverlawn and 749 Riverlawn. The water stands about four
inches deep at 745 and 749 Riverlawn. When it rains water stands
six to eight inches at 724 Riverlawn. This water is dirty, filthy
and a health hazzard for small children playing o~ falling into it.
We have heard every excuse possible; paticularly the old saying,
"there is no money". We request nothing extra, just that the
street be repaired so that it will drain. I have paid taxes for
forty years on my home and think that the west side of the city
should at least get the streets and drains repaired.
MY son owns the house at 724 Riverlawn; my daughter owns
at 745 Riverlawn; and I own the house at 767 Riverlawn.
numbers are 420-7158 and 425-4765.
the one
Our phone
Any help on this matter will be greatly appreciated.
N -;. ~,
If) '--.;>
. Vl-
-u..
La,; O. ::>u.
> <to
co ~Y'
W I <->1
u Ij
w ~ci
a: it
~
Thanks
"J/'"}~
(J,V~ l
O. D. Cooper
767 Riverlawn Ave
Chula Vista CA 91910-5220
Phone (619) 420-7158
t'e
\'/k.t1 .
. ~~ ;'>v"? . .f' ./)\:. cr .~
i~/,).' /yv,", /
: .. "C; .A~ a~1
. ;')",/
~ /';"
,
" ." "': "~ ,---..1
. ~t
r----J
-'f' /
~ jh~/Y{-
, -
-
10
~ECEIVE'
'96 JAM -8 P 1 51
'ew.<f."FI,~~ .
"'" ClE<<K'S OFFIC'~
~ 7 7 - /::1_ )1. .4jJ /71'
ClI C A 7'/7/0
( - (, 7'
.f .~^- X&-~ ~ ~ ~
~-A ~ j7 d.cr-x~ du~ q cAcA.
-I/Ikd/$r!.P
j -a~~~~ A~.h~
4 'G //.d/ I;;z. /t4I ~-n~ #-<<... ~ /
70,~A I .o~.4/-'?~.1 ~jrr-<. -;t47t70
;;f~~ /~.
rltc..u, I't- ~"l' .4/~JJ M ~~
VZ< "3 ~-1 ,,~~..z;~ "Jd II /~
~ I'r j, .,,?t~ A~ .tI~ ~ ,
~~7 ~ .A.J:'..rz-- fL 11~, ../~~
f'~--"- p-tf ~ ~ /t'~ R4 h- .
~;'..ttrl .I ~.l.J..-.:z. ~ .~
C.I/ r ~ t.:..-.r. ~~ Ii': {'.-b~~ ~
.;;::rz.~,., 1.2Y~ 1'5';;2.. ~ ~ ~ r;
.<H -;j:..;::;:f .?(4/'~'" cr....-<..~ ,L/1~~'
~/~~~'~J~ C-V .~
~ .~~~.4. "'- ~W~-' ~....~
~: /
. 4 t 11'
.
./V'~
-;t;:: ?.A-!.,.(. i'
, ~ AlAII,;! /lL '
(/ ,>' FV~"1'" d- :','
_. J.
c ..to - : ~ ,.)
~~;"
If,) j ~ (; -;"1'
\f" :r ~p,~;. ~. :~~:~~ .: .,---- -. ...
t. ,n.'\J,n L',' ',/'_~ " -,' ~,' . .'C" .-' ' '
", " " ,,'J . ('- "1>' -
,\,::,uU 1,' ~; . ,', .,., ",- .t..f\ .~>.1:: ,.., ~"'. ,
" ... ~ " t' " '. " " ~
~ ~ ',~' < ,." ' . ~ ", ." " ".. (\ c~ E' .c
" ,~. oJ.. .c_ u ,":.'> "oJ i,L,~~" '~"J~::- ....~(~
cc: :2 ?/~M. rf;;~")
7~ .
~~~
'/Jh -;j' ?V n
,/"
C -,;l,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 1/16/96
Ordinance .). t ~ t1 Amending Municipal Code Section
10.48030, Increased Speed Limits in Certain Zones, Schedule IX, and
Affirming Trial Traffic Regulation #140 for establishing speed limits on
Fifth Avenue from Naples Street to Orange Avenue, and on Faivre Street
from Broadway to the Cul-de-Sac west of Jacqua Street.
SUBMITTED BY: DIrector of Public Workt~
REVIEWED BY: CIty Manage\.j:'l b\;il~Y:) (4/5ths Vote Yes _ No X)
In July 1994, the City Engineer determined the need to establish a 30 MPH speed limit, via
Trial Traffic Regulation #140, on Fifth Avenue between Naples Street and Orange Avenue, and
on Faivre Street between Broadway and the Cul-de-Sac west of Jacqua Street. A traffic and
engineering study, as required by State Law, was conducted by staff It was determined, based
on this Engineering and Traffic Survey, that the speed limit of 30 M.P.H. was the appropriate
speed limit on the two (2) streets. Prior to this Trial Traffic Regulation, the speed limit on
both of these streets was not posted. The speed limits have been in effect for eight months and
is before Council to make these speed limits permanent.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDA TION: That City Council place the ordinance on first reading amending
Municipal Code Section 10.48.030, Increased Speed Limits in Certain Zones, Schedule IX, and
Affirming Trial Traffic Regulation #144 for establishing speed limits on Fifth Avenue from
Naples Street to Orange Avenue, and on Faivre Street from Broadway to the Cul-de-Sac west
of Jacqua Street, thereby making these regulations permanent.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission at its meeting
of December 14, 1995 voted MSC 5-0-2 (Commissioners Hoke and Smith absent) to approve
staff s report and recommend to City Council that Council place an ordinance thereby making
these regulations permanent.
DISCUSSION:
On May 24, 1994, staff sent to the City Council, a Trial Traffic Regulation to establish speed
limits on Fifth Avenue and Faivre Street as described in the schedule below.
10.48.030 Increased Speed Limits in Certain Zones - Schedule IX
Name of Street Beginning At Ending At Declared Prima Facie Speed
Limit
* Fifth A venue Naples Street Orange Avenue 30 M.PH
Faivre Street Broadway Cul-de-Sac w/o 30 MPH
Jacqua Street
*
Signs were posted on April 26, 1995. Delay due to construction in the area.
6-/
Page 2, Item "
Meeting Date 1/16/96
Said regulation became effective when the appropriate posting of signs and pavement markings
were put in place on April 26, 1995. The regulation has run for a trial period of 8 months
from the date of such posting, at which time a review of said regulation was made to determine
if it should be made permanent. A review of the traffic conditions by staff and the Police
Department show that this Trial Traffic Regulation is operating effectively. Therefore, staff
recommends that the Trial Traffic Regulation be made permanent.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of signs and pavement markings is estimated to be $2,200,
which includes full cost recovery factor. This work was performed as a part of the current
operating budget of the Operations Division of Public Works.
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Area Plat and Engineering/Traffic Survey for Fifth Avenue
Exhibit B - Area Plat and Engineering/Traffic Survey for Faivre Street
Exhibit C - Trial Traffic Regulation #140
DI\1W:0760-99-CY -027
M:\JIO.ME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \SCHEDUlE,TIR
~".2..
ORDINANCE NO.
..J,t~tl
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 10.48.030 OF THE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE, INCREASED SPEED
LIMITS IN CERTAIN ZONES, SCHEDULE IX, AND
AFFIRMING TRIAL TRAFFIC REGULATION #140 FOR
ESTABLISHING SPEED LIMITS ON FIFTH AVENUE FROM
NAPLES STREET TO ORANGE AVENUE, AND ON FAIVRE
STREET FROM BROADWAY TO THE CUL-DE-SAC WEST OF
JACQUA STREET
WHEREAS, in July 1994, the City Engineer determined the
need to establish a 30 MPH speed limit, via Trial Traffic
Regulation #140, on Fifth Avenue between Naples Street and Orange
Avenue, and on Faivre Street between Broadway and the Cul-de-Sac
west of Jacqua Street; and
WHEREAS, a traffic and engineering study, as required by
State Law, was conducted by staff and it was determined that the
speed limit of 30 M.P.H. is the appropriate speed; and
WHEREAS, the Safety Commission at its meeting of December
14, 1995 voted 5-0-2, with commissioners Hoke and smith absent, to
approve staff's report and recommend to the city Council to adopt
an Ordinance increasing the speed limit.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the city of Chula vista
does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Schedule IX of Section 10.48.030 of the Chula
vista Municipal Code, Increasing State Law Maximum Speed Limits in
Certain Areas, is hereby amended to include the following changes:
10.48.030 Increased Speed Limits in Certain Zones - Schedule IX
Name of Street Beginning At Ending At Speed Limit
*Fifth Avenue Naples Street Orange Avenue 30 M.P.H.
Faivre Street Broadway Cul-de-Sac 30 M.P.H.
wlo Jacqua
street
*
slgns were posted on Aprll 26, 1995.
construction in the area.
Delay due to
SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption, or when the
appropriate signs are erected giving no ice of he maximum speed
limit, whichever occurs last. '
Presented by
AP.. oved. 'ts I
, , l-~~ I \, ~
v
vBruce M. Boogarr ,
Attorney .
~'J!(,-i \,
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\or\speed.inc
r 1 11 1 I I Exhibl
I I I I I I I 1 I 11 III u:
NAPLES STftEET
I ~. I ....
""'J
J I
~ ~ ~
I:i - --
____J I- .... !"l- Z
~ Z ..:_~ . .
C
, 4 ... ~
~ 0 -
i - 1
~ ~
i ug .N'U l)~)v
u,
L = -
~ I- - ..... ... \:J . .
- - ~3~. :..~
I - r
...
.
OXFOftD TREE W.
: I .... . I I
: t I ! F
,
. I
, . I- - f"
, : I I ~
J
SUBJECT AREA I. I I I I -
I
'-1/ ~~V -
_rJ'
I J I ... .. ~
-I~
, I
,. I .
,...; . TT 0
-.
i I 1.~r I t- I IU
. ':'1 ~------
I I r-.' ..~-r 1 '---ro---
I , I : I " . I
, . ! I
PALOMAR TflET -
~--~ I ~,~ -
~
T.
~ t
\- ,... ...
- l--
-- - ......... l~ ~':-J~~
. '--- . -
- -
I ~t:; I- - .-
Qi" - ,1 . -
~ ~ ...1_..1.
Y~1f. ~ .
,J~~tJt _u~ -
/ -~ It
~ I 'r .u .
OIl_WIe IT T , , L I
__ . MJ.D .~/AREA PLAT.
---------
."'1' 5/12/94
-----~-----
.
t A
SPEED LIMIT -- ENGINEERING/TRAFFIC SURVEY:
STREET: Fifth Avenue
LIMITS: NaDles Street - OranQe Avenue
E.xilting Poated Speed Limit: Not nosted KPH
SUMMARY OF SPEED SURVEYS
Segment:
Date Taken:
Number Vehicles on Sample:
85th Percentile Speed:
Range of Speeda Recorded:
:~~~;: St.- Oxford
100 .
~R MP~
20-44 KPH
Oxford - PAlnmAT'
4/6/94
100
"-\1\ MPlI
21-41 HPH
PA'nmA~ _ n~AniP Avp
A/t2/Q'
~o
~ 1 MPH
20-37 MPH
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Width varies 52-58
Horizontal Alignment Tan~ent
Vertical Alignment Gl - +5.20%
Gl - +2.00%
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
feet
Number of lanes for both direction.
2
to -2.75% over 240' VC
to -6.50% over 260' VC
Desi2n Sneed less than 35 MPE
Average Daily Traffic
On-Street Parking Allowed
west side of roadwav nn
4690
7~on A m _ ~:nn p.m on
Oyforti !=:;t",.-ppt
in most area~. 2 hr. uAT'kino
Gegment from N~nlp~ ~tTPpt -
Special Conditions None
Accident History The accident rate on this segment (6.21) accidents per million vehicle
miles is hi2her than the avera2e rate for ~imilAr T'oarlwav~ in ~hp. State of'r.AliforniA
of 2.28 accidents neT million vehicle milp~.
SURVEY RESULTS
Study vaa Prepared by
Steve Smith
Date 4/15/94
"commendation Establish 30 -MPH sneed due to accident rate which 1s hi2her than
statewide avera2e and vertical ali2nment.
Date nc_ndation approved: '1/.i'-" /11/
Jy ~~.c..:'.<~ X. 'R.~
/"J>
Approved .peed limit: 30 KPH
Per evc 40803. Survey Expire.:
4/6/99
, 1
~ ....J , >-- I , r--
1 I '-.. --~
, I____J 1 . ,
, , , .
, 1 . L. ....___ . I I
,
, I I ,
, , ,
, I I
I , ,
I , II: I . - - -,
I
I I ---'---..--
I I I \
, 1
I -l--'-~- ...- - -' - .,.. - I I
'.
_L -~--- , " 1 ,
- - - .. - , " , I
I :, ,
:' I , I r...........-.,- - T
d I
I ,I I , I : I I
'I
r-J I on I . \ I : I
, I
, , I , I I
, , , , 1
I , ,
L _. .. .. J . , -- -'"'\ .
, I \ I ,
, I
, r--; . .
, ,
. ,
.
MAl" STREET
or
OF
,
I
\'- '.
.-'
c
:>
o
c
-.
-----
FAIVRE
I
,.
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
I I
,,. -
I ~_____
- - -.:.::--
-
-
L--
-:-1..---
CITY
cln
CHULA
SAN
-
-
..-
AREA
PLAT
m
lC
~
-.
go
Dennis II. WoII.
TITLE:
11/19192
..
lD
SPEED LIMIT -- ENGINEERING/TRAFFIC SURVEY:
STREET:
LIMITS:
Faivre Street
Broadwav - West of Jacaua Street
Existing Posted Speed Limit:__Not nosted MPH
SUMMARY OF SPEED SURVEYS
Segment:
Date Taken:
Number Vehicles on Sample:
85th Percentile Speed:
"nge of Speeds Recorded:
Broadwav - West of JacQua Street
12/17/93
86
34 HPH
20 - 42 HPH
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
Width 24 - 46
Horizontal Alignment
Vertical Alignment
feet Number of I.nes for both directions
2
Tan~ent
Max ~rade less than 2%
'.
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
Average Daily Traffic
On-Street Parking
2.640
Allowed
Special Conditions
Mostlv industrial area without curb and gutter.
Accident History The accident rate on this se
vehicle miles is higher than the average rate
State of California.
ent (6.78 accidents per million
2.2 or sim ar roa ways' n t e
SURVEY RESULTS
Study vas Prepared by
Steve Smith
Date
4/6/94
"commendation Establish 30 HPH sneed limit due to roadway width and anecial conditions.
Date recommendation approved: '" 1,9 19~
By 13,A. t:<~~ X:. R~
~~~
Approved speed limit:
30 HPH
Per evc 40803. Survey Expirea:
12/17/98
Exhibit C
IHEQBMATIQH IT~M
July 19, 1994
File: CY-027
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: John Goss, City Manager
FROM: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Establishing a Trial Traffic Regulation
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.12.030 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, adopted by Ordinance No. 1625 on May 27,
1975, the City Engineer, with the concurrence of the Chula Vista
Safety Commission, has determined that in the interest of
minimizing traffic hazards and traffic congestion, and for the
promotion of public safety, there is hereby established :
10.48.030
SCHEDULE IX - INCREASED SPEED LIMITS IN CERTAIN AREAS
Name of Street
Beginning At
Ending At
Proposed
Speed Limit
Fifth Avenue
Naples Street
Cul-de-Sac wlo
Jacqua Street
Orange Avenue 30 M.P.H.
Faivre Street
Broadway 30 M.P.H.
The City Engineer has determined the need to establish a posted
speed limit in the area of Fifth Avenue described above. A
traffic and engineering study, as required by State Law, was
conducted by staff and it was determined that the 85th percentile
speed on Fifth Avenue varies from 31 to 38 M.P.H. between Naples
Street and Orange Avenue.
Fifth Avenue is a 52' to 58' curb to curb residential collector
street, with residences on the both sides. Based on the above
mentioned traffic studies and an accident rate of 6.21 accidents
per million vehicle miles which is greater than the statewide
average of 2.28 for similar roadways in the State of California,
and the presence of residences fronting on this street, it has
been determined that the speed limit shall be posted at 30 M.P.H.
The City Engineer has further determined the need to establish a
posted speed limit in the area of Faivre Street described above.
A traffic and engineering study, as required by State Law, was
conducted by staff and it was determined that the 85th percentile
speed on Faivre Street is 34 M.P.H. between Broadway and the west
end of the street at its termination point wlo Jacqua Street.
'::'7
May 17, 1994
File: CY-027
Faivre street is a 24' to 46' wide industrial street, with
several residences on the both sides. Based on the above
mentioned traffic studies and an accident rate of 6.78 accidents
per million vehicle miles which is greater than the statewide
average of 2.28 for similar roadways in the state of California,
the presence of residences fronting on this street, and the high
percentage of tractor trailer traffic, it has been determined
that the speed limit shall be posted at 30 M.P.H.
Said regulations to become effective upon the posting of signs.
The regulation shall run for a trial period of 8 months from the
date of such posting, at which time a review of said regulation
will be made to determine if it should be made permanent.
Attachments:
Area Plats
Engineering and Traffic Surveys
Trial Traffic #140
(C,\OENNIS\TRINAPSP.DOC)
&,'" If)
Page 1, Item ?
Date January 16, 1996
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
TITLE:
J~/ yt?
Resolution approving amendment and renewal of the City's
lease agreement between the City and Jorge Valerdi, Trustee, IDM
Leasing Division for 311 F Street Telecenter.
SUBMIlTED BY:
Barbara Bamberger, Environmental ResCor\~e Manager ~~
John D. Goss, City Manage,y\ \?!)\~~4/5th Vote: Yes_ N02.J
REVIEWED BY:
In December 1994, Council approved a one year lease agreement for the downtown telecenter.
This action simply extends the existing lease agreement for an additional year.
RECOMMENDA TION: Approve resolution amending and renewing lease agreement
between the City and Jorge Valerdi, Trustee, IDM Leasing Division for telecenter space at
3 ] I F Street.
DISCUSSION:
In December 1994 the City approved a one year lease agreement with Dr. Jorge Valerdi,
Trustee, IDM Leasing Division for the downtown telecenter. At that time, the City negotiated
a two year option to renew. This item approves renewal of the existing lease for an
additional year, through December 31, 1996. The facility includes 8 workstations, one private
office, a multi-media conference center with video-conferencing, a classroom that holds 8
people, and a lunchroom. Rent is calculated at $1. ] 7 per square foot for a "gross rent" of
$199] AO montly. The lease automatically reverted to a month-to-month rental until a
renewed lease is approved.
There has been minor adjustments to the lease, as listed in the attached Amendment No. 1
and based upon the first year operational experience of the telecenter. These adjustments
include the following:
Use of the conference room:
The Telecenter currently shares conference room space with IDM Satellite Division This
space is split and paid for based upon a 75% usage of the space. Due to a recent agreement
between the City and National University to begin distance learning classes, the City
requested a change in the conference room time allocations. Shifts are allowed based upon
mutual consent.
2. Use of the conference room in the evening hours:
7-/
Page 2, Item
Date January 16,
?
1996
Due to noise concerns relative to the University of Phoenix's evening classes over the past
year, IDM required conditional use of the conference room during evening hours for third
party users. It was agreed to hold to the original terms of the lease agreement allowing
evening usage, with the exception of prior agreement by both parties to exchange designated
day/evening hours and to discuss and agree to third party usage on a case-by-case basis.
3. Coffee, drinks and food use in conference room:
Criteria was developed to allow food use in the conference room. Previously the lease
excluded food or drinks at any time within the conference room. This rule became
inconvenient during long conferences or telecenter meetings where coffee and snacks were
served. IDM agreed to allow food under the following conditions: garbage containers must
be provided by the Telecenter during the event; the City will make every effort to remove
carpet and wall paper stains; agreement to clean the room after the meeting to avoid pest
InVaSIons.
4. Ability to darken conference room for presentations
Due to the fact that the conference room contains a large skylight with no shading, it is
difficult to conduct presentations using projection equipment during the daytime hours. The
City has requested, and IDM has concurred that remote control shading will be installed. The
City has agreed to cost share, provided that such cost is reasonable and mutually agreeable.
All other lease terms remain the same.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funding has been previously appropriated and approved by the Council
for telecenter lease expenditures through December 1996. No expenditures are included in
this action. The total annual rent is budgeted at $21,905.40
Attachments:
I. Amendment I, 1996 j
2. Council Re~solution
3. Original Lease ent
4. Agenda ft g Report
~O
?..~
RESOLUTION NO.
1k'/8ZJ
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENT AND RENEWAL OF
THE CITY'S LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
AND JORGE VALERDI, TRUSTEE, IDM LEASING
DIVISION FOR 311 F STREET TELECENTER
WHEREAS, in December 1994, Council approved a one year
lease agreement with Dr. Jorge Valerdi, Trustee, IDM Leasing
Division for the downtown telecenter; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends extending the lease agreement
for an additional year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve amendment and renewal of
the City's lease agreement for one year to December, 1996, between
the city and Jorge Valerdi, Trustee, IDM Leasing Division for 311
F Street Telecenter, a copy of which is on file in the office of
the City Clerk as Document No.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
amendment for and on behalf of the City of Ch a vis
by
Presented by
Barbara Bamberger, Environmental
Resource Manager
Bruce M.
Attorney
C:\rs\valerdi.xtn
7' Y /7-1
Amendment No I
Telecenter Lease at 311 F Street, Chula Vista, CA
Jorge Valerdi, Trustee, IDM Leasing Division ("IDM") and The City ofChuJa Vista
("Telecenter") agree to amend the original lease contract to accommodate the following
c1arificat,ons for 1996:
1.- Use of the conference room
The Telecenter shall have priority access to the conference room during the following hours:
1200 pm - 4.30 pm Tue- Fri Jan 30 to Feb 2 and May 7to May 10
8:00 am - 1000 am Daily
1215 p.m- 500 p.m Daily
Each party shall seek the other's permission to use the conference room at times other than those
specified above
2.- Use of the conference room after 530 pm
Conference room usage after 530 pm shall be permitted under the operating agreement of the
original contract for T elecenter associates Third party usage shall be accepted on a case-by-case
basis and will be subject to payment derived from a fee schedule to be determined at a later date
3.- Conditions regarding food in the conference room
Coffee, minor snacks and drinks shall be allowed under the following conditions
a) Garbage containers must be provided by the Telecenter during thot event; Telecenter will make
every effort to remove any carpet and wall paper stains as soon as possible. However, IDM
reserves the undisputed right to clean such stains at T elecenter's expense in the event that
Telecenter does not comply in a timely.
b) Cleaning of the room will be done as soon as possible and must include vacuum cleaning and
removal of garbage containers.
c) No other food is allowed in order to minimize the presence of ants and cockroaches
4 Conditioning of the conference room for 35 mm projections
IDM shall darken the conference room allowing for 35 mm projections by iristalling remote
control operated shades by February 29. Telecenter shall help defray the cost of such shades
provided that such cost is reasonable and mutually agreeable
Dr. Jorge Valerdi, Trustee
IDM Leasing Division
The City of Chula Vista
?'S'
RESOLUTION NO. 1/(, '1(,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
C1UULA VISTA APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE A ONE YEAR LEASE AGREEMENT
WITH TWO ONE-YEAR EXTENSIONS WITH DR. JORGE
VALERO I FOR THE DOWNTOWN CHULA VISTA
TELECENTER AT 311 F STREET
WHEREAS, on August 25, 1994, the city opened its first
telecenter at 1550 East H Street, which telecenter should be at 42%
occupancy by October 31st; and
~EAS, as part of the city's contractual obligation to
its grantors, Caltrans and the University of California - Davis, a
second telecenter site must be opened by November 1, 1994; and
WHEREAS, a lease agreement with Dr. Jorge Valerdi for the
downtown site at 311 F Street is proposed for the period December
~5, 1994 thru December 1, 1995; and
WHEREAS, said lease will obligate the city to pay "gross
rent" at the rate of $1.17 per square foot for 1704 square feet,
for a total yearly rent of $23,900; and
WHEREAS, the lease includes a two year option to renew at
the existing lease rate with the first month free for each of the
two one-year options; and
WHEREAS, lease payments are included within the City's
existing telecenter budget and all costs are reimbursable under
existing caltransjUC - Davis funding.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve the a one-year lease with
Dr. Jorge Valerdi for the downtown Chula Vista Telecenter at 311 F
Street in such form as may be finally approved by the City
Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of
the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the City
Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said lease for and on behalf of
the city of Chula Vista.
Presented by Approved as to form by
C ~_~~~? ~ )
Barbara Bamberger, Environmental
Resource Manager
.f:._
c: ,r-a\telcntr1
-/t?c... f -
7-?
This lease is made and entered into on 'x pee. 02'\. IQ11, 1994 by and between
The City of Chuls Vista, hereafter "LESSEE", and Jorae Valerdi. Trustee: rDM
Leasina Division, hereafter referred to as "LESSOR".
LESSOR for and in consideration of the rent to be paid by LESSEE, and of the
covena~ts and provisions to be kept and performed by LESSEE under this Lease,
hereby leases to LESSEE, and LESSEE hereby agrees to lease from LESSOR~ the
following: Real property commonly known as 311 F Street, Chula V~sta,
California, also known as the Valerdi Building, hereinafter "The Premises",
See Addendum A.
1. TERM: The term hereof shall commence on January 1, 1995, and expire on
December 31, 1995.
2. RENT:
installments
1, 1995.
The total rent shall be $23,896.90 and shall be payable in
of $1,991.40 on the first day of each month beginning on January
Calculations of Rent is as follows:
Rental rate of $1.17 per s.f. for Suite to be designated Suite 8, which
is agreed to be 1389 Square Feet - $1,625.13. $1.17 per s.f. for 75% use of
420 s.f. conference room or 315 s.f. (at $1.17 per s.f.) - $366.40. LESSOR
shall have the right to utilize the conference room 25% of the workweek, with
the LESSEE receiving sole exclusivity to the conference room 75% of a typical
workweek. Telecenter access shall be scheduled for the time of 8:00 A.M. -
1:00 P.M. and from 3:15 P.M. - 5:00 P.M. each business day. Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the parties agree to be flexible and to cooperate in the
adjustment of these time periods in the event that either party requires such
an adjustment. Evening hours will be utilized on a "schedule by availability
basis". Total monthly rent to be $1,991.40.
The actual useable square footage is to be verified by a mutual
insp~ction upon completion of improvements, and calculation of square footage
of the rent equations will be reduced accordingly, if the actual square
footage is less than provided herein. This adjustment to be done at the time
of first option to renew.
All rents shall be paid to LESSOR, or his authorized agent at the following
address: 311 F Street, Chula vista, CA 91910 or at such other place as may
be designated by the LESSOR from time to time.
If LESSOR has not received any rent payment within five (5) days after
it is due pursuant to this section of the lease, Lessee shall pay as
additional rent a charge of $120.00 plus interest at eight percent (8%) of
the delinquent amount. LESSEE agrees to pay $50.00 for each dishonored bank
check. LESSOR and LESSEE agree that it would be impracticable and extremely
difficult to fix the actual damages suffered by LESSOR in the event that
LESSEE makes a late payment of rent and that the unpaid and due rent
represents a reasonable approximation of the damages LESSOR is likely to
suffer from such a late payment. LESSOR and LESSEE further agree that this
provisions does not establish a grace period for the payment of rent, and
that LESSOR may make a demand for the payment of rent at any time after it
becomes due.
3. USE: The LESSEE intends to use the Premises as a telecenter. Such
general use may include one or more of the following specific uses: office
and conference space subleasing, office or business related nerninars and
classes, and on-site sale of office services including photocopying, faxing,
computer time and teleconferencing. LESSEE shall be solely responsible for
obtaining any and all applicable land use or other permits required in
connection with its specific use of the Premises.
4. USES PROHIBITED: LESSEE shall not use any portion of the premises for
purposes ot'_er than those specified hereinabove, dnd except for the permitted
uses, no URe shall be made or permitted to be made upon the premises, nor
acts done, which will increase the existing rate of insurance upon the
Page One of Six Pages
LESSOR'S INITIALS
LESSEE'S INITIALsJ\
I. ,
JJ.V.
t'
?..-9
PrQn~rQn 1?1?1/q4
property, or cause cancellation of insurance policie~ covering said ~roperty.
LESSEE shall not conduct or perm~t any sale by auct~on on the premlses.
5. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: LESSEE shall have the right to assign or
sublease all or a portion of the premises as part of the LESSEE's normal
operation of the Premises as a telecenter, as such use is described herein.
Other than as herein provided, LESSEE shall not assign this lease without
prior written consent of the LESSOR, which shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
6. ORDINANCES AND STATUTES: LESSEE shall comply with all statutes,
ordinances and requirements of all municipal, state and federal authorities
now in force, or which may hereafter be in force, pertaining to the preQises,
occasioned by or affecting the use thereof by LESSEE. The commencement of
pendency of any state or federal court abatement proceeding affecting the use
of the premises shall, at the option of the LESSOR, be deemed a breach
hereof.
7. MAINTENANCE: LESSOR shall maintain, at its sole cost, in good order,
condition and repair (a) the exterior and structural asp~ctB of the Premises
and (b) all utility and other systems serving the Premises including, ~ithout
limitation, all plumbing, HVAC, electrical, sprinkler and related utility and
safety systems, all common areas, including conference room and bathrooms.
In the event that LESSOR fails to maintain the Premises as required above,
LESSEE shall have the right to complete any required maintenance or repair
and deduct the cost of such items from rent otherwise due to LESSOR. Except
as provided above, LESSEE shall be responsible at its sole cost for
maintaining the interior of the Premises.
Alterations: LESSEE shall be entitled to alter the interior of the
Premises without LESSOR's consent provided that all such alterations do not
al ter the basic structure of the Premises, are conducted in a good and
workmanlike manner, and do not exceed $20,000.00 in value. All other
alterations shall require LESSOR's prior reasonable consent. LESSEE shall
notify LESSOR at least 2 days prior to commencing any such alterations.
8. ENTRY AND INSPECTION: LESSEE shall permit LESSOR or LESSOR'S agents to
enter upon the premises at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice, for
the purpose of L.specting the same, and will permit LESSOR at any time wi thin
sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of this lease, to place upon the
premises any usual "To Let" or "For Lease" signs, and permit persons desiring
to lease the same to inspect the premises thereafter.
9. INDEMNIFICATION OF LESSOR: Except as caused by LESSOR'S negligent or
intentional acts, LESSOR shall not be liable for any Jamage or injury to
LESSEE, or any other person, or to any property, occurring on the demised
premises or any part thereof. LESSEE agrees to indemnify and to hold LESSOR
harmless from any claims for damages arising from conduct by LESSEE or
telecenter users which is negligent or constitutes willful misconduct except
to the extent caused by the negligence or intentional acts of LESSOR. LESSEE
shall be responsible for maintenance of plate glass for their suite.
10. POSSESSION: Subject to LESSEE I 5 termination rights set forth in
paragraph 31 hereof, LESSOR is unable to deliver possession of the premises
at the commencement hereof, LESSOR shall not be liable for any damage caused
thereby, but LESSEE shall not be liable for any rent until possession is
delivered.
11. INSURANCE: LESSEE, at its expense, shall maintain public liability
insurance including bodily injury and ~roperty damage insuring LESSEE and
LESSOR with minimum coverage of $1,000,000.00 per incident.
LESSEE shall provide LESSOR with a Certificate of Insurance showing
LESSOR as additional insured. The Certificate shall provide for a ten-day
written notice to LESSOR in the event of cancellation or material change of
coverage.
To the maximum extent permitted by insurance policies which may be owned by
LESSOR or LESSEE, LESSEE and LESSOR, for the benefit of each other, waive
any and all rights of subrogation which might otherwise exist.
LESSOR shall r..tain property casualty insurance in coverage amounts
equal to the replac..ement crqt of the building and comprehensive genera]
liability insurance with re~~ect the Premises in the minimum coverage emount
of $1,000,000.00 on a per pp.rson basis.
LESSOR'S
LESSEE'S
INITIALS J V
INITIALS-)(" &f
Page Two of Six Pages
?-jtJ
12. UTILITIES: LESSEE agrees that it shall be responsible for the payment
of utilities delivered to Suite A only, including gas, electricity, heat and
other services delivered. LESSOR pays water and trash.
13. SIGN: LESSEE shall not construct any project sign or awning without
the prior written consent of LESSOR which consen~ shall not be unreasonably
withheld. Any signs must be built and installed with City Permit and
approval. LESSEE to have access to directory, monument or bUllding mounted
signs on property, in an amount no less than their proportionate percentage
of total building. Any signs must match the architectural theme of building.
14. ABANDONMENT OF PREMISES: LESSEE shall not vacate or abandon the
premises at any time during the term hereof, and if LESSEE shall abandon or
vacate the premises or be dispossessed by process of law, or otherwise, any
personal property belonging to LESSEE left upon the premises shall be deemed
to be abandoned and accounted for pursuant to California civil Code Section
1980.
15. CONDEMNATION: If any part of the premises shall be taken or condemned
for public use, and a part thereof remains which is susceptible of occupation
hereunder, this lease shall, as to the part taken, terminate as of the date
the condemnor acquires possession, and thereafter LESSEE shall be required
to pay such proportion of the rent for the remaining term as the value of the
premises remaining bears to the total value of the premises at the date of
condemnation; provided however, that within sixty (60) days after notice of
any proposed condemnation proceedings, either party may, at that party's
option, notify the other party of their intent to terminate this lease as of
the date the condemnor acquires possession. In the event that the demised
premises are condemned in whole, or that such portion is condemned that the
remainder is not susceptible for use hereunder, this lease shall terminate
upon the date upon which the condemnor acquires possession.
All sums which may be payable on a~count of any condemnation shall belong to
the LESSOR, and LESSEE shall not be entitled to any part thereof, provided
however, that LESSEE shall be entitled to retain any amount awarded to him
for his trade fixtures or moving expenses.
16. TRADE FIXTURES: Any and all improvements made to the premises during
the term hereof shall belong to the LESSOR, except trade fixtures of the
LESSEE. LESSEE may, upon termination hereof, remove all his trade fixtures,
but shall repair or pay for all repairs necessary for damage to the premises
occasioned by removal.
17. DESTRUCTION OF PREMISES: In the event of a part~al destruction of the
premises during the term hereof, from any cause, LESSOR shall forthwith
repair the same, provided that such repairs can be made within (60) days
under existing governmental laws and regulations, but such partial
destruction shall not terminate this lease, except that LESSEE shall be
entitled to a proportionate reduction of rent while such repairs are being
made, based upon the extent to which the making of such repairs shall
interfere with the business of LESSEE on the premises.
If such repairs cannot be made within said sixty (60 days, LESSOR, at
his option, may make the same within a reasonable time, the lease continuing
in effect with the rent proportionately abated as aforesaid, and in the event
that LESSOR shall not elect to make such repairs which cannot be made within
sixty (601 days, this lease may be terminated at the option of either party.
In the event that the building in which the demised premises may be
situated or the premises are destroyed to an extent of not less than one-
third of the replacement costs thereof, LESSOR or LESSEE may elect to
terminate this lease whether the demised premises be injured or not. A total
destruction of the building in which the premises may be situated shall
terminate this lease.
In the event of any dispute between LESSOR and LESSEE with respect to
the provisions of this Section 17, the matter shall be settled by arbitration
in such a manner as the parties may agree upon, or if they cannot agree, in
accordance with the rules of the American Arbitration Association.
18. I..SOLVENCY: In the eVLnt that a receiver s~iall be appoint.ed to take
over tne business of the LES,EE, or in the event that the LESSEE shall make
a gen~ral assignment for the benefit of credit~rs, or LESSEE shall take or
suffer any action under any insolvency or bankruptcy act, the same shall
) \(
Page Three of Six Pages
')-//
LESSOR'S INITIALS ~
constitute breach of this lease by LESSEE.
19. REMEDIES OF LESSOR ON DEFAULT: In the event of any breach of this lease
by LESSEE, LESSOR may, at his o~tion, terminate the lease and recover from
LESSEE: (a) the worth at the t1me of award of the unpaid rent which was
earned at the time of termination; (b) the worth at the time of award of the
amount by which the unpaid rent which would have been ed..Lued (:lfte.!..
termination until the time of the award exceeds the amount of such rental
loss that the LESSEE proves could have been reasonably avoided; and (c) the
worth at the time of award of the amount by which the unpaid rent for the
balance of the term after tt~e time of award exceeds the amount of such rental
loss that LESSEE proves could be reasonably avoided; and (d) any other amount
necessary to compensate LESSOR for all detriment proximately caused by
LESSEE'S failure to perform his obligations under the lease or which in the
ordinary course of things would be likely to result there from.
LESSOR may, in the alternative, continue this lease in effect, as long
as LESSOR does not te~minate LESSEE'S right to possession, and LESSOR may
enforce all his rights and remedies under the lease, including the right to
recover the rent as it becomes due under the lease. If said breach of lease
continues, LESSOR may, at any. time thereafter, elect to terminate the lease.
Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to limit any other rights or
remedies which LESSOR may have.
20. SECURITY: The Security Deposit of $1,991.40 shall secure the
performance of the LESSEE'S obligations hereunder. LESSOR may, but shall
not be obligated, to apply all or portions of said deposit on account of
LESSEE'S obligations hereunder. Any balance remaining upon termination shall
be returned to LESSEE. LESSEE shall not have the right to apply the Security
Deposit in payment of the last month's rent.
21. DEPOSIT REFUNDS:
30 days fron, date of
Agent, together with
deposits by LESSOR.
22. ATTORNEY'S FEES: In case suit should be b~ought for recove~y of the
premises, or for any sum due hereunder, or because of any act which may arise
out the possession of the premises, by either party, the prevailing party
shall be entitled to all costs incurred in connection with such action,
including a reasonable attorney's fee.
The balance of all deposits shall be refunded within
possession it delivered to LESSOR or his authorized
a statement showing any charges made against such
23. WAIVER: No failure of LESSOR to enforce any term hereof shall be deemed
to be a waiver.
24. NOTICES: Any notice which either party mayor is required to give,
shall be given by mailing the same, postage prepaid, to LESSEE at the
premises, or LESSOR at the address shown below, or at such other places as
may be designated by the parties from time to time.
25. HOLDING OVER: Any holding over after the expiration of this lease, with
the consent of LESSOR, shall be construed as a month-to-month tenancy at a
rental of $2,500.00 per month, otherwise in accordance with the terms hereof,
as applicable.
26. TIME: Time is of the essence of this lease.
27. HEIRS, ASSIGNS, SUCCESSORS: This lease is binding upon and inures to
the benefit of heirs, assigns and successors in interest to the parties.
28. OPTION TO RENEW: Provided that LESSEE is not in default in the
performance of this lease, LESSEE shall have the option to renew the lease
for (2) two additional terms of (12) months ("Renewal period") commencing at
the expiration of this lease term. All of the terms and conditions of the
lease shall apply, including the rental rate during the Renewal Period. The
option shall be exercised by the LESSEE by giving written notice to the
29. LESSOR'S LIABILITY: The term "LE"SSOR", as used in this pac.graph, shall
mean the owner of the real property. In the event of any transfer of such
title or interest, the LESSOR named herein (or the grantor in case of any
subsequent transfers) shall be relieved of all liability ~elated to LESSOR'S
obligations to be performed after such t~ansfer. Provided, however, that any
?-J;L
JV"-n_
r-age l"our or ::)1X .Pages
j.ESSOR'S INITIALS
f' ds in the hands of LESSOR or Grantor at the time of such transfer shall
'b~ndelivered to Grantee. LESSOR'S obligations hereunder shall be binding
upon LESSOR'S successors and assigns only during their ~esp~ctive pe~iods of
ownership. LESSOR not less than 60 days prior to ~he exp~ra~~on, of, th~s le~se
term. If notice is not given in the manner prov~ded here~n w~th~n the t~me
specified, this option shall expire. LESSEE shall have first month free for
each of the two 1 year options.
30. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE: (a) LESSEE shall up to 2 times a year and upon
not less then (14) days' prior written notice from LESSOR execute,
acknowledge and deliver to LESSOR a statement in writing [1] certifying that
this ledse is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, if modified,
stating the nature of such modification and certifying that this Lease, as
so modified is in full force and effect), the amount of any security deposit,
and the date to which the rent and other charges are paid in advance, if any,
and [2] acknowledging that there are not, to LESSEE'S knowledge, any uncured
defaults on the part of LESSOR hereunder, or specifying such defaults if any
are claimed. Any such statement may be conclusively relied upon by any
prospective purchaser or encumbrancer to the Premises.
(b) At LESSOR'S option, LESSEE'S failure to deliver such statement within
such time shall be a material breach of this Lease or shall be conclusive
upon LESSEE [1] that this Lease is in full force and effect, without
modification except as may be represented by LESSOR, [2] that there are no
uncured defaults in LESSOR'S performance, and [3] that not more than one
month's rent has been paid in advance or such failure may be considered by
LESSOR as a default by LESSEE under this Lease.
(c) If LESSOR desires to finance, refinance, or sell the Premises, or any
part thereof, LESSEE hereby agrees to deliver to any lender or purchaser
designated by LESSOR such financial statements of LESSEE as may be reasonably
required by such lender or purchaser. Such statements shall include the past
(J) three years' financial statements of LESSEE. All such financial
statements shall be received by LESSOR and such lender or purchaser in
confidence and shall be used only for the purposes herein set forth.
31. TERMINATION RIGHTS AND PENALTIES: LESS~E shall have the right to
terminate this lease if LESSOR does not demonstrate to the satisfaction of
the LESSEE, in LESSEE's sole discretion, its ability to have the property
ready for occupancy by December 15, 1994. If the property is not ready for
occupancy by that date, LESSEE may terminate the lease or receive one day
free rent for each day delayed, deductible from first rent payment(s).
32. ADDENDUM: One addendum, signed by the parties, is attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
33. REQUIRED TENANT IMPROVEMENTS: LESSOR, at its sole cost, as part of the
tenant improvement budget, shall construct the following improvements in
accordance with plans, specifications and a timetable approved by LESSEE and
consistent with the occupancy date, and consistent with the designer's plans.
a. finished interior (i) walls, other than a clean white shell, "to
be defined as all perimeter walls drywalled, taped and textured ready for
painting", including delineation of private offices, specifications to be
determined in conjunction with LESSEE's designers, Sewell & Associates, a
conference room/telecommuter lounge, (iil ceiling, installed light fixtures
and (iii) carpet and installation, with carpeting to be provided by Tenant,
including carpeting install&tion, and any specially designated design
features, dete~~ined by LESSEE's designers;
b. cabinets, counters, and a sink in the employee/user lounge area;
c. exterior doorway access into the F Street side of the Premises.
Any and all work will be performed by LESSOR's licensed general contractor
and/or his licensed subcontractors, or LESSEE, and shall be done ~n
accordance with all applicable, federal, state and local laws including,
without limitation, the Americans with Disabi' ities Act. All work to be
performed by LESSOR p' th respect to the Premise., and all other work .oroposed
by LESSUR with respect to the interior and exterior of the remaind~r of the
building in which the Premises are located, shall be completed in s~fficient
time prior to the January 1, 1995 commencement date of the lease to permit
LESSEE to occupy and commence its intended use of the Premises as of
P~n~ Fivp ~f Six Pages
7-/3
. ,)
sdch conunencernent date. Landlord agrees to complete the construction 01: tile
-exterior of the building within thirty (30) days after LESSEE has occupied
the premises. During this thirty (30) days LESSEE retains its right to the
peaceful and quiet possession of the premises. If interior construction is
not completed by the date set forth above, LESSEE will receive one day free
rent for each day of construction past the deadline. If the exterior
construction is not completed within 30 days after occupancy, then LESSEE
shall have the right to terminate lease. Pursuant to this paragraph, "tenant
.:.mprovements" shall not include normal items of construction such as HVAC,
electrical wiring, and master switches for the phone system which shall be
installed by LESSOR at LESSOR's sole cost. Individual HVAC for unit will be
installed with ducting to space, but not including individual registers for
distribution and return of air. Electrical and telephone service will be run
to individual unit subpanels. Normal plugs and switches for shell will be
installed. Additional plugs and switches for additional walls of tenant
improvement will be part of tenant improvement budget. Any tenant
improvements beyond the $17.00 per square foot shall be approved and paid for
by the LESSEE prior to installation.
If building and tenant improvements are not ready for oC"cupancy on
January 1, 1995, rent shall be pro-rated to the date unit is ready for
occupany.
34. CONFERENCE ROOM:
except for the chairs
at end of lease. All
The conference room will be furnished by the LESSOR,
which the LESSEE will provide and may take with them
tenant improvements will be provided by LESSOR.
35. CARPET: The LESSEE will provide the carpet for their suite and
conference room, but not padding or installation.
36. General Contractors: General Contractor is to supply the finishes as
specified by LESSEE, the use of low VOC and non-toxic, construction materials
will be required for all paint and adhesives, and energy efficient lighting
will be used within SUITE A.
37. LESSEE'S RIGHT TO TERMINATE DUE TO LACK OF FUNDING: LESSOR recognizes
that LESSEL is dependent upon a public grant from the California Department
of Transportation and the County of San Diego in order to fund its operation
on the premises beyond the sixth month of its initial term. In the event
that LESSEE loses all or a portion of such funding and is therefore unable
to fund this lease, LESSEE shall have the right, upon 30 days written notice
to LESSOR, to terminate the lease without any default or penalties.
38. TERMINATION RIGHTS AND PENALTIES: LESSEE shall further have the right
to terminate this lease without penalty if LESSOR does not establish, to the
satisfaction of the LESSEE, that a qualified, experienced General Contractor,
licensed by the State of California, has been retained and will perform all
building construction and tenant improvements for LESSEE'S premises, all
common areas, and the exterior of the building. LESSOR shall present to the
LESSEE no later than 10/24/94, a signed agreement between the LESSOR and the
General Contractor retained for this purpose, and proof of said Contractor's
licensing.
ENTIRE AGREEMENT: The foregoing constitutes the entire agreement between the
paries and modified only by a writing signed by both parties. The following
Exhibits, if any, have been made a part of this lease before the parties'
execution hereof: Exhibit A - Floor Plan
The undersigned Lessee hereby acknowledges receipt of a copy hereof.
Lessor: Lessee:
Jor~. va17~~' ~ Trustee
Lea lng Dl 810n
~ cJeAr(,V
Page six of
The City of Chula vista
/] .I .. //
By: ~ j,/ .'~
s~es
Mr.
IDM
By:
7'/'/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item tr' / /
Meeting Date 1!~ j-'/~t'
Resolution J! / ? 'I Approving Maintenance Agreement for
East Orange Avenue Infiltration Basin among City of San Diego,
United States Olympic Committee, Eastlake Development Company,
and City of Chula Vista
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public Work~j ''I~
,.C \~
City Manage~~ ~~\
,..".
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoXl
REVIEWED BY:
This agreement provides for the permanent maintenance of the East Orange Avenue
infiltration basin. It designates the parties responsible for maintenance of the basin, and
identifies the open space maintenance district assessments as the mechanism for
financing permanent maintenance.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving the Maintenance
Agreement for East Orange Avenue Infiltration Basin among City of San Diego, United
States Olympic Committee, Eastlake Development Company, and City of Chula Vista.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Construction of East Orange Avenue from the Olympic Training Center to Wueste Road
requires that an infiltration basin be constructed to collect runoff from a portion of East
Orange Avenue and a small slope area adjacent to the street which drains to the Lower
Otay Reservoir operated by the City of San Diego. The basin is designed to remove
pollutants from the runoff and prevent any potential degradation of the water quality of the
reservoir. Currently, the Olympic Training Center (OTC) is the only benefitting user,
however, future development of parts of Eastlake may also benefit from this basin. Zone
C of Eastlake Maintenance District No.1 (ELMD1) has been set up to fund maintenance
of the related open space and will be expanded to include the infiltration basin
maintenance. Currently the OTC is the only property within Zone C, but when Eastlake
develops the area tributary to Otay Lake and this basin, that property will be added to Zone
C.
ThiS agreement requires Eastlake Development Company (EDC) to maintain the basin to
the standards as specified in Exhibit C of the agreement for an interim period of three years
subsequent to completion of construction and acceptance of the basin by the City. The
standards were developed by the City of San Diego to protect the water quality of the
reservoIr. Prior to acceptance of the basin by the City, a cash bond will be required from
EDC to guarantee said maintenance. The City of Chula Vista also agrees to work toward
8"'/
Page 2, Item r/'
Meeting Date ljiiiii jlij'7t-
incorporating the cost of maintenance for the infiltration basin into the expansion of ELMD1
to include future Eastlake development
At the end of the interim maintenance period by EDC, long-term maintenance would be
turned over to the City of San Diego. Costs of maintenance will be financed and paid for
by collection against ELMD1, Zone C assessments. Alternatively, if the Olympic Training
Center is still the only benefitting property for the infiltration basin, they may request
permission to maintain it themselves. If the City of Chula Vista approves, long-term
maintenance may be turned over to the United States Olympic Committee (USOC).
However, prior to turning maintenance over to USOC, the City of Chula Vista would require
that USOC provide security to guarantee maintenance for a period of one year. If USOC
does not maintain the basin according to the required standards, or for any reason
discontinues maintenance, the City of San Diego would have the right to enter the basin
to perform the required maintenance. Costs for the maintenance would then be paid from
the security provided by USOC for the first year and incorporated into the ELMD1, Zone
C budget for subsequent years. The current estimated annual cost of maintenance is
$6,000.
As with the formation of, or adjustment of assessment, for any assessment district, there
are risks associated with the proposed action. The City Attorney has indicated that there
is a risk that if, for any reason such as a challenge to the ability to establish a benefit to the
assessees, the City is unable to incorporate the long term maintenance costs for the
infiltration basin into the expansion of ELMD1, Zone C, the City would be responsible of
payment of said costs from whatever other funds are available including the general fund.
There is also a risk of a majority protest to future increases to the Zone C assessment or
collection amount necessitated by increased maintenance costs or changes in
maintenance requirements mandated by changes to federal or state water quality
standards. If the protest were successful, the City would be obligated to pay for
maintenance costs from other available funding sources including, if necessary, the
general fund. Staff believes, however, that the risk of a protest is minimized because the
OTC has concurred in the benefit of adding the maintenance of the basin via a provision
In this agreement to not protest its inclusion. Additionally, development of other benefitting
properties would be conditioned with paying their fair share of infiltration basin
maintenance costs through formation of, or annexation to, an open space maintenance
district. Since no other properties would be allowed to drain toward the lake, the nexus is
the need for that phase of Orange Avenue. Staff tentatively believes that this portion of
Orange Avenue is needed to serve that additional development and a nexus can be drawn.
However, even if the nexus cannot be drawn for those other properties the OTC would still
require this section of Orange Avenue and would still be paying for the basin's
maintenance. The Attorney also indicates that there is also a risk that the basin may
collect harmful contaminants that require special high cost treatment in the future
necessitating increases in the assessments and higher collections. Staff would set the
Initial collectable high enough to cover that possibility in order to avoid the protest. Last,
a' ' ,.;...
Page 3, Item If
Meeting Date~~~1
since the basin is needed because of the presence of Orange Avenue, Gas Tax, or other
street maintenance funds, could be used to pay the cost of maintaining the basin.
Eastlake Development Company and USOC have executed the proposed agreement.
The agreement is currently scheduled to be presented to the City of San Diego City
Council at their meeting of January 15, 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of maintenance for the infiltration basin will be paid by the
developer for the first three years and passed on to the benefitting properties for
subsequent years by incorporating said costs into the ELMD1 assessment budget through
the annual open space budget process. There is no anticipated cost to the City; however,
there is a risk that the City would become responsible for maintenance costs as discussed
above.
File: 60Q-BO-EY-335
m:\HOME\ENGI NEER\agenda\basinagm ,eaf
~:J I<g--~
12/12/1995 07:~~
519D:L:.517...
I_~lr ~~ Grl~LA Vl~l~
,!-\l.::Ic. U...:
THE CITY OF CHUU JI1STA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contn'butions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
b . - r
su cn"'tr~~, --rr Jet.
Unitpn st~tes Olvmnic Committee
A ConGressionally Chartered Not-for Profit Corporation
2, If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
N/A
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust,lisfthe names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
Thomas C. Wilkinson
TTcnr' l!.c:::c;c:::t-;::r,nt- lO'vo"""l1t-iuo nirort-nr
t 4,
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No.L.. If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you berore the City in this matter.
P~t-ricp- Milkovich Laurie McKinlev
Rpnit-~ Fit7?pr~lA Ellen .Tamason
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the .asrellat~ contnbutcd more thanSl,OOO to II
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
Person is defined as: -AllY indlvidunl,flrm. to<JHInnmhip.jo/nll1t1lfUn, tlRotfntioJl, ItKlnl dlIb,!M_I D/'gllIlizntioll, corpornlion,
.SIII/(', trim, r6'6/\'6r, l)",di,nl6, Ihis nlld nllY OIh6r 'DIm/)', city nlld '0II1l1l)', tJI)', muntciJHIllty, district Of Oilier poIilicnl subdivisioll,
DI(N"O<lITEIY ~,'h6r grOllp or comblna/ion ncting as n Ullil." . Q/<t-:- " /:' A . /l(V.
Attach additional pages as necessary) LUW vt / V~
Date: \"2. / I ~ /'i.s
1 . Signature of contractor/applicant ...
I \-; I \.\ DISCLOSJ:.r.\ll
~';:;trice 1L !lilkovich
Print or type name of contractor/applicllnt
", IK...i.cd: I WO,W!
8''' .};
12/12/1995 07:40
6196915171
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PAGE 02
THE C11Y OF CHULA. VISTA PARTY DISCWSURE STATEMENT
Stat~ment of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contn"butions, on all matters
wh ich will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and' all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. Ust the names of all persons having a financial interest In the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
EastLake Development Company
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
Boswell Properties. Inc.
Tulago Company
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list' the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization Or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
N/A
t 4.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No.lL If yes, please indicate person(s):
5.
Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this mattcr.
Katv Wright - EastLake Dev. Co.
Bruce Sloan - EastLake Dev. Co.
6,
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than '$1,000 to n
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No7If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
~ is defined as: "Anylndividunl,flm~ co-pnl1ttmhlp,jolnl ...nllll'l, Qnodntiotl,soclal club,fi'rltmtal orgtIIIilntiOll, corporntlon,
CS/tl/(', /nISI, ftccll'tlr, S)'nt!ictll" Ihll tlnd tiny olhtlf county, clly and COlIn",', r:J1)', IIlIlIIiclpallly, district or olher pnlilicnlll/bdll'isicJ//,
or elIl)' olhtlr group or cOlllblllllliolll/Cling ns n ulllt."
(NOTE: Anach addillonal pages as nccc:ssftry)
Dale: I&(; ~/q)
[\.: 1 '.\'DISC\.OSI!.rx1'
?,~
Si""!~'I'PPH,"n'
Katy Wright, froject Manager
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
(1Ievl><<l: l1f.\<"-OI
RESOLUTION No.I~lj~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
FOR EAST ORANGE AVENUE INFILTRATION BASIN
AMONG CITY OF SAN DIEGO, UNITED STATES OLYMPIC
COMMITTEE, EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, AND
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula
vista does hereby approve the Maintenance Agreement for East Orange
Avenue Infiltration Basin among city of San Diego, united States
Olympic Committee, Eastlake Development Company and the City of
Chula Vista, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk as Document No.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce M.
Attorney
c: \rs\orange.bas
8"'; !ti-C/
Developer
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Above Space for Recorder's Use
RECORDING REQUESTED BY:
City Clerk
WHEN RECORDED MAil TO:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
No transfer tax is due as this is a
conveyance to a public agency of
less than a fee interest for which
no cash consideration has been paid
or received.
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR EAST ORANGE AVENUE
INFilTRATION BASIN
This Maintenance Agreement for East Orange Avenue Infiltration Basin is entered into
on this _ day of
, 1996 by and among the City of Chula Vista, a municipal
corporation ("CHUlA VISTA"), the City of San Diego ("SAN DIEGO"), the United States
Olympic Committee, a Congressionally chartered not for profit corporation ("USOC"), and
Eastlake Development Company ("EDC").
RECITALS
A. EDC has constructed East Orange Avenue between Hunte Parkway and Wueste
Road in the City of Chula Vista. The construction of East Orange Avenue required that an
infiltration basin be constructed in the general vicinity ..>f East Orange Avenue and Wueste
Rev. 12/6/95
~7
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 2
Road. The basin is needed to collect runoff from approximately 2.6 acres of impervious surface
of Orange Avenue and 1.9 acres of the natural hillside area adjacent to Orange Avenue. These
two areas will drain into the basin. The infiltration basin ultimately discharges to the Lower Otay
Reservoir. The location of the basin is shown on Exhibit "A" and more specifically described
in Exhibit "B", attached hereto.
B. The USOC is the owner of property adjacent to the Infiltration Basin, which
property will be benefitted by operation of the Infiltration Basin. The USOC desires the option
to elect to perform long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin on the terms and conditions
set forth herein.
C. Lower Otay Reservoir is a large domestic water supply lake which is maintained
by the City of San Diego, Water Utilities Department. Preventing the potential degradation of
the lake's water quality as a result of urban runoff is necessary for public health reasons.
D. Best Management Practices (BMP) are management procedures or structural
physical facilities, or a combination of both, which reduce or prevent the pollution of water. The
Infiltration Basin is a BMP designed to mitigate the impacts of urban runoff and remove
pollutants from the storm water prior to discharging downstream to the Lower Otay Reservoir.
E. CHULA VISTA, SAN DIEGO, USOC, and EDC desire to enter into this
agreement to provide for the long term maintenance of the East Orange Avenue Infiltration
Basin (hereinafter referred to as "the Infiltration Basin").
Rev 12/6/95
8'- /t)
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 3
F. Eastlake Maintenance District NO.1 is currently in effect and may be used to
collect funds for the purpose of payment of the long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin.
NOW, THEREFORE in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligations of the parties
as herein expressed, CHULA VISTA, SAN DIEGO, USOC, and EDC agree as follows:
1. Obliaations of EDC.
1.1 Interim Maintenance by EDC. In accordance with the terms and conditions of
this agreement, EDC shall maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the Infiltration Basin in
accordance with the standards and schedules set forth in Exhibit "C", attached hereto and
made a part hereof, for a period of three years from the date of acceptance by CHULA VISTA.
Said acceptance by CHULA VISTA shall occur upon completion of construction and final
inspection by CHULA VISTA and SAN DIEGO representatives and completion of corrections,
if any, and in accordance with Acceptance by CHULA VISTA, Paragraph 1.3.
1.2 Grant Title to CHULA VISTA. EDC shall grant in fee to CHULA VISTA title to
the Infiltration Basin as shown in Exhibit "A" and more specifically described in Exhibit "B".
EDC shall initiate grant procedure within 60 days of recordation of this agreement and a deed
shall be recorded immediately prior to, or concurrently with, acceptance of Infiltration Basin by
CHULA VISTA. EDC shall reserve to itself a maintenance easement with the right of ingress
and egress for the purpose of maintaining the Infiltration Basin for a period of three years.
1.3 Acceotance bv CHULA VISTA. Immediately upon completion of construction
of the Infiltration Basin CHULA VISTA shall accept the Infiltration Basin provided that it is fully
Rev. 12/6/95
~II
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 4
operational and EDC demonstrates the following to CHULA VISTA and SAN DIEGO representatives:
. Infiltration Basin has been constructed in accordance with the plans and
specifications
. proper working order of flap valve
. structural stability of the pipe
. filter fabric and soils are in place per design specifications
. viability of plant vegetation on basin slope
If necessary, a punch list of correction items will be prepared and EDC will make the
corrections indicated. When the punch list items have been corrected to the satisfaction of
CHULA VISTA and SAN DIEGO, CHULA VISTA shall accept the Infiltration Basin. CHULA
VISTA and SAN DIEGO shall not unreasonably withhold approval of basin acceptance.
1.4 Start of Interim Maintenance Period. The three year interim maintenance
period by EDC shall commence immediately upon written acceptance of the Infiltration Basin
by CHULA VISTA.
1.5 Securitv for Interim Maintenance Period. Prior to acceptance of Infiltration
Basin by CHULA VISTA, EDC shall submit to CHULA VISTA an estimate, subject to approval
by CHULA VISTA, for the cost of three years' maintenance of the Infiltration Basin and shall
provide a cash deposit as security for interim maintenance in the amount approved by CHULA
VISTA. In the event EDC, or its successors, fail to maintain the Infiltration Basin as provided
under this Agreement, SAN DIEGO shall give wntten notice to CHULA VISTA and EDC of such
failure specifying the nature of such failure and the maintenance requested by SAN DIEGO.
In the event EDC, or its successors, has not commenced such maintenance as specified in the
notice provided by SAN DIEGO within fourteen (14) days of the date of postmark of said notice,
SAN DIEGO shall hFlve the right t-: enter the Infiltration Basin and perform such requirec'
g"... / .;..
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 5
maintenance; and in such case CHULA VISTA shall reimburse SAN DIEGO for reasonable
costs and expenses in performing such maintenance from funds deposited by EDC with
CHULA VISTA as security for said maintenance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this
Paragraph 1.5 shall have no effect or limitations on the provisions of Paragraph 4.2 herein.
1.6 Provide Evidence of Pavment of Runoff Fees. Within 15 days of execution of
this agreement, EDC shall provide evidence to CHULA Vista that EDC has paid their pro rata
share of the Regional Urban Runoff Program to SAN DIEGO. Said share shall not exceed
$4,500.
2. Lona Term Maintenance bv SAN DIEGO. At the conclusion of the three year interim
maintenance period by EDC, performance of long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin
shall become the responsibility of SAN DIEGO, subject to Paragraph 4.3, unless USOC
requests and CHULA VISTA approves option (b) in Paragraph 6.1, to directly perform and
assume responsibility for long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin. SAN DIEGO shall
have the right at any time to enter the Infiltration Basin Property to perform required
maintenance as described in Exhibit "C".
3. Turnover Procedure and Reauirements. CHULA VISTA shall use its best efforts to
assist EDC in facilitating the turnover of maintenance responsibility to SAN DIEGO in
accordance with the following Turnover Procedure and Requirements:
Ninety (90) days prior to turnover, EDC shall request in writing that the turnover
procedure be initiated. Within thirty (30) days, representatives from CHULA VISTA and
SAN DIEGO shall inspect the Infiltration Basin for the following items:
Rev. 12/6/95
~'l3
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 6
. Infiltration Basin has been constructed in accordance with the plans and
specifications
. pro;Jer working order of flap valve
. structural stability of the pipe
. filter fabric and soils are in place per design specifications
. viability of plant vegetation on basin slope
If necessary, a punch list of correction items will be prepared and EDC will make the
corrections indicated within 60 days. When the punch list items have been corrected to the
satisfaction of CHULA VISTA and SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO shall commence performance of
long term maintenance. CHULA VISTA and SAN DIEGO shall not unreasonably withhold
"'pproval of basin acceptance.
4. Obliaations of CHULA VISTA
4.1 Securitv Deeosit. CHULA VISTA shall place funds for interim maintenance
security deposited by EDC, as described in Paragraph 1.5 in a separate interest-bearing
account earmarked solely and specifically for the purpose of defraying the costs of the
Infiltration Basin interim maintenance. Neither the principal nor the interest may be used for
any other purpose. Within 30 days after turnover of maintenance responsibility from EDC to
USOC or SAN DIEGO in accordance with Turnover Procedure and Requirements as described
in Paragraph 3, and upon written request by EDC, CHULA VISTA shall reimburse said funds
to EDC, including interest.
4.2 Eastlake Maintenance District NO.1
CHULA VISTA shall use its best
efforts in and diligently pursue, incorporating estimated long term maintenance costs for the
Infiltration Basin into the Eastlake Maintenance District No.1 (ELMD1), Zone C assessment
'i/'-I'f
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 7
budget. Said district may be utilized to collect funds on a periodic basis for the purpose
payment of long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin.
4.3 Pavment to SAN DIEGO. In the event that SAN DIEGO performs long term
maintenance pursuant to Paragraph 2, CHULA VISTA shall reimburse SAN DIEGO for
reasonable costs and expenses in performing long term Infiltration Basin maintenance from the
ELMD1, Zone C assessment budget or other available source. This provision shall apply
regardless of whether CHULA VISTA is successful in incorporating long term maintenance
costs for the Infiltration Basin in ELMD1 assessments under Paragraph 4.2.
5. Aareement not to orotest. USOC agrees not to protest the inclusion of costs for long
term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin in ELMD1, Zone C; nonetheless, USOC may reserve
the right to contest the amount included in such district and allocation of assessments related
thereto among the affected property owners.
6. Ootions of the USOC
6.1 Lona Term Maintenance bv USOC. Eighty days prior to the the conclusion of
the three year interim maintenance period by EDC as described in Paragraph 3, CHULA VISTA
shall determine and give written notice to USOC as to whether USOC is the sole benefitting
property for the Infiltration Basin. USOC shall request in writing, sixty days prior to the end of
said interim maintenance period by EDC, the option of:
a) paying for its proportionate share of the long term maintenance of the Infiltration
Basin through payment of an assessment by ELMD1, Zone C, or
/'
?,)~
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 8
b) directly performing long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin in accordance
with requirements as listed in Exhibit "C", to be performed by a mutually agreed
upon party.
However, if USOC does not request either option within the specified time, option a) shall
become effective immediately after the conclusion of interim maintenance by EDC.
6.2 Agreement with SAN DIEGO. Should USOC be granted the option of directly
maintaining the Infiltration Basin under Paragraph 6.1 b, USOC shall obtain an access and
maintenance easement from CHULA VISTA and shall enter into an agreement with SAN
DIEGO to assume full responsibility for long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin and
releasing CHULA VISTA from any and all responsibility or liability for maintenance.
6.3 Securitv for Lona Term Maintenance Bv USOC. USOC shall submit an
estimate, subject to approval by CHULA VISTA, for one year's maintenance of the Infiltration
Basin, and shall be assessed by CHULA VISTA, in the amount approved by CHULA VISTA.
via ELMD 1 Zone C to provide USOC's fair share of funds as security for maintenance. Funds
for security shall be collected over no more than three years following the date of acceptance
described in Paragraph 1.4. In the event USOC, or its successors, fail to maintain the
Infiltration Basin as provided under this Agreement, SAN DIEGO shall give written notice to
CHULA VISTA and USOC of such failure specifying the nature of such failure and the
maintenance requested by SAN DIEGO. In the event USOC, or its successors, has not
commenced such maintenance as set forth in this notice of SAN DIEGO within fourteen (14)
days of postmark of said notice, SAN DIEGO shall have the right to enter the Infiltration Basin
and perfonm such required maintenance and in such case CHULA VISTA shall reimburse SAN
DIEGO for reasonable costs and expenses in performing such maintenance from ELMD 1 Zone
C funds collected from USOC and any other benefitting properties as security for said
ReI'. 1216195
y,/t
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 9
maintenance. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Paragraph 6.3 shall have no effect or
limitations on the provisions of Paragraph 4.2 herein.
6.4 Reversion to Ooen Space Maintenance District. If following the conclusion of
the three year interim maintenance period by EDC described in Paragraph 1.4, SAN DIEGO
assumes, for any reason, long term maintenance of the Infiltration Basin, CHULA VISTA shall
use its best efforts to incorporate long term maintenance costs for the Infiltration Basin in the
following fiscal year's assessment budget for ELMD 1, Zone C.
6.5 CHULA VISTA to Facilitate Turnover. If USOC is granted option b) in Paragraph
6.1 by CHULA VISTA, CHULA VISTA shall use its best efforts to facilitate turnover from EDC
to USOC in accordance with Paragraph 3, Turnover Procedure and Requirements.
7. Indemnitv bv EDC. Upon commencement of and during the period of interim
maintenance by EDC, EDC agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless CHULA
VISTA and SAN DIEGO, their agents, elected and appointed officers, and employees from and
against any and all claims asserted, liability cost and expense (including without limitation
attorney's fees) established for damages or injuries to any person or property which arise from
or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of EDC,
CHULA VISTA, or SAN DIEGO or any of their agents, officers, subcontractors, and employees,
in connection with performing the work or services covered by this Agreement, and all
expenses of investigating and defending against same; provided, however, that EDC's duty to
indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the established
sole negligence or willful misconduct of CHULA VISTA, its agents, elected and appointed
officers, or employees. EDC indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses,
attorneys' fees and liability incurred by CHULA VISTA its officers, agents, or employees in
deferrfing against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, EDC
Rev. 12/6/95
2'-/?
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 10
at its own expense shall, upon written request by CHULA VISTA, defend any such suit or action
brought against CHULA VISTA, its officers, agents, or employees. EDC's indemnification of
CHULA VISTA shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by EDC.
8. Indemnitv bv USOC. Upon commencement and during the period of long term
maintenance by USOC, USOC agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold CHULA VISTA,
SAN DIEGO, and its agents, elected and appointed officers, and employees harmless from and
against any and all claims asserted or liability cost and expense (including without limitation
attorney's fees) established for damages or injuries to any person or property which arise from
or are connected with or are caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of
USOC, or any agent, officer, subcontractor, employee or others of CHULA VISTA and USOC
in connection with performing the work or services covered by this Agreement, and all
expenses of investigating and defending against same; provided, however, that USOC's duty
to indemnify and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liability arising from the
established sole negligence or willful misconduct of CHULA VISTA, SAN DIEGO, its agents,
elected or appointed officers, or employees. USOC's indemnification shall include any and all
costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by CHULA VISTA its officers, agents, or
employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not.
Further, USOC at its own expense shall, upon written request by CHULA VISTA, defend any
such suit or action brought against CHULA VISTA, its officers, agents, or employees. USOC's
indemnification of CHULA VISTA shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by
USOC.
Rev 12/6/95
8'-/y
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 11
9. Chanaes to Water Qualitv Standards. Should federal and/or state water quality
standards change in the future thus necessitating changes to the Infiltration Basin maintenance
requirements outlined in Exhibit C, this agreement and Exhibit C shall be amended to conform
with current federal and state water quality standards.
10. General Provisions
(a) Successors in Interest. This Agreement and all rights and obligations contained
herein shall remain in full force and effect whether or not any or all parties to this Agreement
have been succeeded by another entity, and all rights and obligations of the parties signatory
to this Agreement shall be vested and binding on their successors in interest.
(b) Governina LawNenue. This Agreement shall be ~overned by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this
Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County,
State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible.
Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
(c) Attornevs Fees. In the event that suit is instituted to enforce the provisions of this
Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees in
addition to any other costs, damages or remedies from the other party.
(d) Amendments. No modifications, waiver, amendment, discharge or change ofthis
Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and executed by all parties, hereto, and
then shall be valid only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which given.
(e) Severability. If any term, provision, or condition of this Agreement shall be found
to be invalid or unenforceable, the remaining terms, provisions, and conditions shall,
nevertheless, remain in full fr :ce and effect.
Rev. 12/6/95
lJ'.... /9
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 12
(f) Entire Agreement. This agreement contains the entire agreement between the
parties on the subject matter hereof. Any prior oral or written representations, agreements,
understanding, and statements shall be of no force or effect. This Agreement is not intended
to supersede or amend any other agreement between the parties unless expressly noted.
(g) Headinas. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience
only and shall not define or limit the provisions hereof.
(h) Counteroarts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart,
each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which, when taken together shall
constitute but one instrument.
(i) Notices. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or by law, any and all
notices required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or delivered to any
party shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received when
personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed, or in lieu thereof, when three (3)
business days have elapsed following deposit in the U. S. mail, certified or registered mail,
return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to the address indicated in this
Agreement. A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving
written notice of such change to all other parties. Facsimile transmission shall constitute
personal delivery.
SAN DIEGO:
Water Utilities Director
City of San Diego
City Administration Building
Ninth Floor, MS9B
202 C Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Phone: (619) 236-6164
Fax: (619) 236-6219
EDC:
Eastlake Development Company
900 Lane Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91914
Attn: Katy Wright
Phone: (619) 421-0127
Fax: (619) 421-1830
It ~ ,2()
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 13
USOC:
United States Olympic Committee
One Olympic Plaza
Colorado Springs, CO 80909
Attn: Thomas C. Wilkinson
Phone: (719) 578-4631
CITY:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Attn: Director of Public Works
Phone: 691-5021 Fax: (619) 691-5171
A party may change such address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of
such change to the other in the manner provided in this paragraph. Facsimile transmission
shall constitute personal delivery.
(h) Caotions. Captions in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference
and do not define, describe, or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms.
(I) Recordina. This Agreement, or an abstract hereof prepared by any party, may
be recorded at the option of any party.
OJ Preoaration of Aareement. No inference, assumption or presumption shall be
drawn from the fact that a party or its attorney prepared or drafted this Agreement. It shall be
conclusively presumed that all parties participated equally in the preparation and drafting this
Agreement.
(k) Recitals: Exhibits. Any recitals set forth above are incorporated by reference into
this Agreement.
(End of page. Next page is Signature Page.)
8' "&1.../
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 14
Now therefore, the parties thereto, having read and understoood the terms and
conditions of this agreement, do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting
their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Shirley Horton
Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Bruce Boogaard
City Attorney
Dated:
?,.,).~
Rev. 12/6/95
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 15
CITY OF SAN DIEGO
A Municipal Corporation
By:
Milon Mills, Jr.
Water Utilities Director
Approved as to Form:
Ted Bromfield
Chief Deputy City Attorney
Dated:
Rev. 12/6/95
i" ... ,J.. :J
Infiltration Basin Agreement
Page 16
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
A California General Partnership
By: Boswell Properties, Inc.
~ralPartner .
BY:Y~~
Paul G. Niet
Vice Pre .
By: The Tulago Company
a general partner
BY:~~
Paul G. Nieto
Vice Pr e
Dated:
Rev. 12/6/95
Y;,,2-{
Infiltration Basin Agreement
UNITED STATES OL YPMIC COMMITTEE
A Congressional Not for Pr fit Corporation
B~CtJ
Thomas C. Wilkinson
Dated: n - /J- '9~
County of El Paso
State of Colorado
,~"2r (I~~~~~~ 'h"
~J. C~lngharn ~
13th da~tcR~!.'rnber
".<; ~ ,_...~.IvI1-;~''''
,i ~./ ....G'.~
!f,~..' '..:.s-\
s!J/ ~OTAR~' \~i
~"'! '---- ~' .
\(11\,. PUBL.'C /8
~~"" ....,..
'%-+......~........_......oqf
~"'4t OF CO~-~.,)..
"llIIllllllI""'\\'""
MY COU"SSlON [1,.0:
Se"'MlDtC' a.1iM
2" ':,).f
Page 17
M\HOME\ENGjNEER\LANDOEV\BASINAGT EAF
1995.
Rev. 12/6/95
INFILTRATION. BASIN
Exhibit "A"
-.,.~ ~ 'oo.~ 1
.
-
I
I
_-Vi
~1).(\~0 /
_ 0
-- - \:,3S\ --
-- -------
---
__ ------;~3~ .
,,-\.0 .---------
~'V~;;--
I
( ~
"'---
/1.1 - -
lJeSfe ~
-- ----::'OqCj
--
-----
North
Locator Map
Infiltration Basin
0.788 ac.
...
\
,
,
......
.
ARCO Training Center
North
J''' ..u,
.
~
5620 Friilni R.otld
S.tl.n Diego
Cll,llf"tnita Q2110.2596
(019)291-0707
EXHIBIT "B"
ruCK ENGINEERING COMPANY
Legal Description
J-11789
WUESTE ROAD, PARCEL "3"
By: CDC/jb
Teller.
eo.
Order Ho.
Dot.
--,.
Rev. ay
Date: March 14, 1995
Page 1 of 1
That portion of Rancho Janal in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State
of California, according to the Map thereof No. 989 on file in the Office of the San
Diego County Recorder, more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at a point on the Northerly Right-of-way line of Wueste Road as shown on
Road Survey No. 831 on file in the Office of the San Diego County Engineer; said
point also being the Northeasterly terminus of that certain 260.00 foot radius curve
concave Easterly with a Delta of 143002'00", a radial line to said curve bears North
17001 '18" West, (North 17021' West per Record); thence Westerly along said Right-
of-way line and the arc of said curve through a central angle of 06036'40" a distance
of 30.00 feet; thence continuing Westerly along said Right-of-way line and the arc of
said curve through a cent~al angle of 20005'00" a distance of 91.14 feet to the TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continuing Southwesterly along said Right-of-way line
and the arc of said curve through a central angle of 20049'29" a distance of 94.50
feet to a point on the arc of a non-tangent 482.00 foot radius curve concave
Southeasterly, a radial line to said point bears North 49034'51" West; thence leaving
said Right-of-way line Southwesterly along the arc of said curve through a central
angle of 12018'06" a distance of 103.49 feet: thence South 28007'03" West 69.55
feet; thence South 30023'40" West 3.00 feet; thence North 59036'20" West 61.50
feet; thence North 01029' 58" West 174.52 feet; thence North 44004'42" East
82.00 feet; thence North 65055'21" East 85.00 feet; thence South 43042'58" East
1 02.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing 0.788 Acres.
(~, /)
Chris D. Ciremele
L.S. 5267
( Vo..f m (~
f\1i'03 4/89
8'r,2.? -
EXHIBIT C
EAST ORANGE AVENUE
INFILTRATION BASIN
MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE
I SCHEDULE I CHECK I MAINTENANCE I
Every one month or 72 Perforated underdrain for clogging The pipe should be rodded or
hours after wet weather by checking flow from the outlet of snaked to locate and/or remove
the pipe roots or other debris.
Every two months or after Build-up of sediment and debris Excess sediment should be removed
wet weather and disposed of in spoil area;
regrade to original dimensions and
elevation.
Every two months or after Excessive ponding of over 72 hours Remove upper two inches of
wet weather due to loss of soil's ability to allow accumulated sediment and replace
percolation of the water into the with suitable new soil to the original
lower layers of the filter soil elevation.
Every two months Spoil area for material removed Designate on-site area to be
from infiltration basin reviewed and approved by City of
San Diego, to stockpile the sediment
and debris which could be used for
landscaping (if suitable) or to be
eventually iandfilled; stockpile
material away from drainage areas
and concentrated drainage.
Every two months or after Performance of the lateral pipe's Repair/replace if necessary.
wet weather outlet for scour and stability of grass
crete pad
Every month; bi-weekly Vegetation growth Mow and maintain on a bi-weekly
during rainy season basis during rainy period and within
six weeks of the last rain.
Thereafter, mow once a month
(weather permitting).
Every four months Mechanical function of flap valve Clear debris and foreign objects.
Every November Flap valve movement Lubricate flap valve hinges.
(M:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDE\f\BASINAGT.EAF)
Rev. 12/6/95
8",,2('
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 1/16/96
ITEM TITLE: Resolution /g'/ tr / Accepting bids and Awarding Contract for
"Construction of Sidewalk Ramps on Various Streets in Preparation for the
FY 1995-96 Overlay Program in the City of Chula Vista, CA (STL-224)"
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works i~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager J(~ bG.?:t~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX)
At 2:00 p.m. on December 13, 1995 in Conference Room 2 in the Public Services Building, the
Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Construction of Sidewalk Ramps on Various
Streets in Preparation for the FY 1995-96 Overlay Program in the City ofChula Vista, CA (STL-
224)." The work to be done consists of removal of curbs, gutter, and sidewalk and the construction
of pedestrian ramps on various streets in the City of Chula Vista. The specific work for the sidewalk
ramps on each of various streets is summarized in Table 1 (Attachment A). The total number of
ramps to be constructed is 125.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract for "Construction of
Sidewalk Ramps on Various Streets in Preparation for the FY 1995-96 Overlay Program in the City
ofChula Vista, CA (STL-224)" to Portillo Concrete, Chula Vista in the amount of$55,781.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Funds for this project were budgeted in FY 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for
the overlay of various streets throughout the City ofChula Vista. As part of the Overlay Project, the
City constructs sidewalk ramps where necessary adjacent to the streets that are to be overlaid. This
year staff prepared a separate contract to perform just the concrete work associated with the Overlay
Project. It was believed that this would result in a considerable savings in the cost of constructing
the ramps. Based on last year's prices reccived in the overlay project, the anticipated cost would
have been approximately $131,000. The actual low bid for the work was $55,781. Staff is in the
process of preparing specification for the asphalt concrete overlay portion of the project. We
estImate to advertise for bids on January 27, 1996.
Bids for this project were received from seven contractors as follows:
Contractor Bid Amount
1. Portillo Concrete - Chula Vista $55,781.00
2. Fox Construction - San Diego 85,360.00
, Star Paving, Corporation - San Diego 87,065.00
~.
9-/
Page 2, Item ---3..--
Meeting Date 1/16/96
Contractor Bid Amount
4. Basile Construction, Inc. - San Diego 94,229.90
5. Hammer Construction, Company - Chula Vista 103,657.50
6. Doug Kost Konstruction - Poway 109,577.50
7. Builders StatT Corporation - Cardiff 119,432.11
The low bid by Portillo Concrete is below the Engineer's estimate of$III,204 by 55,423 or 49.8%.
Staffs estimate was based on average prices just recently received for similar type work. Because
of the current economic conditions and the number of bidders, the City received an outstanding bid
for the proposed work. The contractor is not a large firm, therefore, these overhead expenses are
probably greatly reduced. In addition, stafT visited some of these project sites recently completed
by Portillo Concrete and confirmed that the work was done satisfactorily.
Staff has reviewed the references supplied by Portillo Concrete and these were satisfactory.
Therefore, staff recommends awarding the contract to Portillo Concrete for construction of this
project.
Disclosure Statement
A copy of the contractor's disclosurc statement is attached as Attachment B.
Environmental Status
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project has
determined that the project is exempt under Section 15301 (c), Class I of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Minor Alterations of Existing Public Improvements or Public
Structures).
PrevailinJ? WaQC Statement
The source of funding for this project is Transportation Partnership Funds. Contractors bidding this
project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for the work under
this project. No special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of
the bid documents. Disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to bid through the sending of the
Notice to Contractors to various minority trade publications.
9~eJ.
Page 3, Item -3-
Meeting Date 1116/96
Financial Statement
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $55,781.00
B. Staff (Design & Inspection) 15,000.00
C. Material Testing 500.00
D. Contingencies (Approximately] 0%) 5,619.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $76,900.00
FUNDS A V AILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. 1995-96 Overlay Program (STL-224) $76,900.00
TOTAL FUNDS A V AILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $76,900.00
FISCAL IMPACT:
Construction ofthis project will construct the required concrete work and sidewalk ramps associated
with the 1995-96 Overlay Program. Funds were budgeted in the 1995-96 Capital Improvement
Program in Project STL-224.
Attachments
A - Sidewalk Ramps Locations to be Constructed in Preparation for the FY 1995-96 Overlay
Program
B - Contractor's Disclosure Statement NOr SCP..Nrat;
SLH:sb
M ;\1 IUME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \PEDRAMI'S_SI ~H
File No: 0735-10-STL224
9'3!cr-lf
RESOLUTION NO. JJV/~I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR "CONSTRUCTION OF SIDEWALK RAMPS
ON VARIOUS STREETS IN PREPARATION FOR THE FY
1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CA (STL-224)"
WHEREAS, at 2:00 pm on December 13, 1995, in Conference
Room 2 of the Public Service Building, the Director of Public Works
recei ved the following seven bids for "Construction of Sidewalk
Ramps on Various Streets in Preparation for the FY 1995-96 Overlay
Program in the City of Chula Vista, CA (STL-224).":
Contractor Bid Amount
Portillo Concrete - Chula vista $55,781. 00
Fox Construction - San Diego 85,360.00
Star Paving - San Diego 87,065.00
Basile Construction - San Diego 94,229.90
Hammer Construction Company-Chula 103,657.50
vista
Doug Kost Konstruction - poway 109,577.50
Builders Staff Corporation - Cardiff 119,432.11
WHEREAS, the low bid by Portillo Concrete is below the
Engineering estimates of $111,204 by $55,423 or 49.8%; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the references supplied by
Portillo Concrete, which were satisfactory and, therefore, staff
recommends awarding the contract to Portillo Concrete for
construction of this project; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed the work involved in this proj ect and determined the
project is exempt under Section 15301(c), Class 1 of the California
Environment Quality Act (Minor Alterations of Existing Public
Improvements or Public Structures); and
WHEREAS, the source of funding for this proj ect is
Transportation Partnership Funds and prevailing wages were not
required for work under this project, however, no special minority
or women owned business requirements were necessary as part of the
bid documents.
1
9-.5
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby find, determine, order and resolve
as follows:
Section 1. That the City Council concurs in the
determination that this project is categorically exempt under
Section 15301(C), Class 1, "Minor Alterations of Existing Public
Improvements or Public Structures" of the California Environmental
Quality Act, and directs the Environmental Review Coordinator file,
or ratifies the filing of, a notice of exemption for this project.
Section 2. That the Council does hereby accept the bid
of Portillo Concrete as responsive and awards the contract for
"Construction of Sidewalk Ramps on various streets in Preparation
for the Fy 1995-96 Overlay Program in the City of Chula vista" to
Portillo Concrete in the amount of $55,781.00.
Section 3. The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is
hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on
behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
A7ved as t
~^
form by
~
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce M.
Attorney
d, City
C:\rs\overlay
2
f.-?
~
\
SIDEWALK RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PREPARATION FOR
THE FY 1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM
Sheet LOCATION Northwest Southwest Southeast Northeast Not Within a
No. Corner Corner Corner Comer Curb Return
2 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Woodlark Ct. & Woodlark Ln.
3 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Hilltop Dr. & Jicama Way
3 T-INTERSECTlON G-29 G-29
Jicama Way & Platano Way
6 T-INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Sierra Way and First Ave.
6 EASTERLY T-INTERSECTlON G-29 G-29
Sierra Way & Fairway Ct.
6 WESTERLY T-INTERSECTlON G-29 G-29
Sierra Way & Fairway Ct.
6 T-INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Sierra Way and Elm Ave.
6 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Sierra Way and Second Ave.
6 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Sierra Way and San Miguel Dr.
7 4-WAY G-29 G-29 G-29
Ash Ave. and Davidison St.
8 T -INTERSECTION G-28
Casselman & Monte Vista Ave.
J>
-\
--j
.....
r.
"I
7
m
2
-\
"'-J
~
m~\Engineer\Admin\Contracl\OVRPREP .24(Boiler.Min)
TABLE I
~
\
~
SIDEWALK RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PREPARATION POR
TIlE PY 1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM
Sheet LOCATION Northwest Southwest Southeast Northeast Not Within a
No, Comer Comer Corner Comer Curb Return
9 T-INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Alpine Ave. and 'P" Street
9 T -INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Alpine Avenue and Minot Ave.
10 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Minot Ave. and Cypress
10 T -INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Minot Avenue and Alpine Ave.
10 T-INTERSECTlON G-28 G-28
Minot Ave. and "G" SI.
II T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Dora! Way and Sweetwater Rd.
11 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Dora! Way and Bonita Verde Dr.
17 T-INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Portuna SI. and Evans Ave.
17 4-WAY G-29 G-29 G-29 G-29
Portuna SI. and Cuyamaca Ave.
17 T-INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Portuna SI. and "L" SI.
19 T -INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Vista Way and "G" SI.
b
"1
-I
~
r,
:t.
"Z
~
!TJ
z
-;
"lJ
f'!
m:\Engineer\Admin\Contracl\OVRPREP.2.((Boiler.Min)
TABLE I
~
,
~
SIDEWALK RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PREPARATION FOR
THE FY 1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM
Sheet LOCATION Northwest Southwest Southeast Northeast Not Within a
No. Comer Comer Comer Corner Curb Return
19 T-INTERSECTlON G-29 G-29
Vista Way and Corte Maria Ave.
19 T-INTERSECTlON G-28 G-28
Vista Way and Hilltop Dr.
21 T-INTERSECTION G-28
Monte Vista Ave. and Casselman SI.
22 T -INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Vista Way and "G" SI.
24 T-INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
San Miguel Dr. and Del Mar Ave.
24 T-INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
San Miguel Dr. and Second Ave.
26 T -INTERSECTION G-3l G-31
Rogan Rd. and Bonita Road
27 4-WAY G-31 G-31 G-31 G-31
Halsey SI. and East Park Ln.
27 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Halsey St. and Ash Ave.
27 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Halsey SI. and Beech Ave.
27 T -INTERSECTION G-28
Alpine Ave. and Kearney
::t.
'-j
...,
~
r"
:t.
'Z
h
Z.
...,
:t:
LA
m:\Engineer\Admin\Contrad\OVRPREP.24(Boiler.Min)
TABLE I
~
\
"-
~
SIDEWALK RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PREPARATION FOR
THE FY 1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM
Sheet LOCATION Northwest Southwest Southeast Northeast Not Within a
No. Corner Comer Corner Comer Curb Return
29 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-29
Potrero Ct. and Inkopath St.
30 T -INTERSECTION G-28 G-28
Penelope Dr. and Elsie Way
30 T -INTERSECTION G-28
Penelope Dr. and Carla Ave.
31 4-WAY G-29 G-28
Palomar St. and Hilltop Dr.
31 T-INTERSECTlON G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Cuyamaca Ave.
31 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Helix Ave.
31 T-lNTERSECTlON G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Joselyn Ave.
31 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Judson Ave.
31 4-WAY G-28 G-28 G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Monserate Ave.
31 4-WAY G-28 G-28
Palomar St. and Melrose Ave.
31 T-INTERSECTI0N G-31
Palomar St. and School DfW
~
-\
-\
.J.i
r,
=>
'7
hi
t
-I
))
I
..)::.
m:\Engineer\Admin\Contraet\OVRPREP .24(Boiler.Min)
TABLE 1
~
"-
"
SIDEWALK RAMPS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN PREPARATION FOR
THE FY 1995-96 OVERLAY PROGRAM
Sheet LOCATION Nonhwest Southwest Southeast Nonheast Not Within a
No. Comer Comer Comer Corner Curb Return
31 T-INTERSECTION G-31 G-31
Palomar St. and School DfW
31 T-INTERSECTION G-31 G-31
Palomar St. and School DfW
31 T -INTERSECTION G-29 G-31 G-31
Palomar St. and Nolan Ave.
32 4-WAY G-29 G-29
Orange Ave. and Hilltop Dr.
33 4-WAY G-29 G-29 G-29 G-29
Orange Ave. and Jasper
33 4-WAY G-29 G-29 G-29 G-29
Orange Ave. and Jade
33 4-WAY G-29 G-29 G-29 G-29
Orange Ave. and Larkhave Dr.
34 DRIVEWAY Two-G-31
Nonh Gover Ave. SIO Trousdale St.
"J::.,
-\
-!
":!:
~
::r
~
it
<
-!
:b
,
\1"'
,
TYPE" A-I" Sidewalk Ramps (G-28) = 57
TYPE "CO Sidewalk Ramps (G-29) = 53
TYPE "D" Sidewalk Ramps (G-31) = 15
Total
125
m:\Engjneer\Admin\Contraet\OVRPREP.U(Boiler.Min)
/'I rrHLrtMf5N T 13
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
You are required to file a Statemem of Disclosure of certain ownership or firtaDCial interests, payments, or campaign contributions,
on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official
bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the Comract,
e.g., owner, applicant, Contractor, subcomractor, material supplier.
NIl\-
2. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more
than 10 % of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
N/~
3. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as
director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
lJrPi
4.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted wiw anyvoember of the City staft;, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve month? Yes _ No A If yes, please indicate person(s):
5.
Please idemify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent Contractors who you
have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
f\IJT!tOIJ\( ~JtLLIp../v\ ruRTILW
Tl~f\ I'M\R\( ffiR\\LlO
YV'\\e\-l.l\EL VJILUPtl'l'\ mR\\LLO
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in )(:ggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the currem
or preceding election period? Yes _ No If yes, state which Council memhers(s):
\'2- \~-9S
Date:
. · · (NOTE: Attached addi~(JJAA
Signature of Comractor/ Applicant
M1\RID fbR\lUD'
Print or type name of Contractorl Applicant
. Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city or country, city municipality, district, or other political
subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit.
15
9'1d..-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / tp
Meeting Date 1/16/96
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution
Development Company by
SDEDC Board of Directors
Commm,", Oe:"orm'r~ "IT"" ( l"
City Manage~J-l ~)~\ / :t:~l
/818'P-
Endorsing the appointment of Curt Stephenson of EastLake
the San Diego Economic Development Corporation to the
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolU
BACKGROUND:
On November 14, 1995, Council approved a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City and the San
Diego Economic Development Corporation (SDEDC). The MOlJ provides for a Chula Vista business representative
to sit on the SDEDC Board of Directors and for Council to participate in the selection of this representative from a
list of members in good standing. The SDEDC is recommending that Curt Stephenson of EastLake Development
Company be appointed to represent Chula Vista.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution endorsing the appointment of Curt Stephenson of EastLake
Development Company by the San Diego Economic Development Corporation to the SDEDC Board of Directors.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The SDEDC Board of Directors is comprised of 21 business representatives from throughout the San Diego region
(see Attachment A for a current list of representatives). Currently the City is not represented on the SDEDC Board
of Directors. Per the City's newly executed MOU with SDEDC (see Attachment B) the Chula Vista Council may
participate in the selection of a Chula Vista based business representative to sit on the SDEDC Board of Directors.
The City's representative must bc "a member in good standing," i.e. a dues paying member. (Minimum dues are
$1,000 annually.) Currently, two Chula Vista based companies are members in good standing ofthe SDEDC. These
arc EastLake Development Company and North Island Federal Credit Union. The SDEDC is recommending Curt
Stephenson of EastLake Development Company.
Stafl supports the recommendation that Curt Stephenson serve the 3 year term as the City's "liaison" to the SDEDC
l3oard. EastLake is very involved in economic development efforts impacting Chula Vista. For example, EastLake
is a partner with the City in the High Tech/l3iotech "Incentive" Zone effort. EastLake is also a member of the San
Diego Technology Counci I/Regional Technology All iance (RT A). The RT A is the governing body for the San Diego
County defense conversion effort, which is funded by a U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development
Administration grant and which coordinates directly with the City's Border Environmental Commerce Alliance.
Council may wish to note that the MOlJ also provides for the City to be represented on any or all of the SDEDC
advisory committees including: I) Team San Diego Business Advisory Board; 2) International Advisory Committee;
3) Business News Bureau; and 4) Cross Border Economic Development/International Trade Legislative Action
Committee. The City's BECA Director has been appointed to the Cross Border Economic Development/International
Trade Legislative Action Committee. Staff will be returniog with an update regarding participation in the other
committees in the near future.
FISCAL IMPACT: Couocil previously approved $10,000 in contribution to the SDEDC as part of the FY 1995-
1996 hudget.
[(\1D) "."WIl51\document\sJedcl
/tJ -/ /I()-~
RESOLUTION
J8"JtY;J..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENDORSING THE APPOINTMENT OF CURT STEPHENSON OF EASTlAKE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BY THE SAN DIEGO ECONOMIC DEVElOPMENT
CORPORATION TO THE SDEDC BOARD OF DIRECTORS
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista on November 14, 1995 approved a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOUl between the City and the San Diego Economic
Development Corporation (SDEDCl in support of mutually beneficial regional economic
development efforts; and,
WHEREAS, the MOU provides for a Chula Vista business representative to sit
on the SDEDC Board of Directors; and,
WHEREAS, EastLake Development Company is currently a member in good
standing of the SDEDC; and,
WHEREAS, EastLake Development Company would serve well as a liaison to
the SDEDC due to their partnership with the City in the High Tech/Bio Tech Zone effort and
their membership on the San Diego Technology Council/Regional Technology Alliance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does
hereby find, order, determine and resolve as follows:
1. The City endorses the SDEDC appointment of Curt Stephenson of EastLake
Development Company to serve a three year term on their Board of Directors.
/-
. l/ ,/
,
'\ L_..__, Ja L~t,-c-~~:
Ch"ris Salomone, Executive Secretary and
Community Development Director
"
APPiVED AS T7FORM BY(
.';:,. J ."J H' .---~. .
I
I Bruce M. Boogaard
Agency Counsel
PRESENTED BY;
/~,. J
.~;.:-':. ....... ..:..... ....... ::,......:::....:.. ....: . :". ....:....:.... '~'., :.:;.....:.:..-... ...... ..:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Office",
David F. Hale - Chairman
Chairman, Presidenl 8. CEO
Gensio,lne
Donald M. Ings - Vice Chair
President
Solar Turbines, Ine..
Anne L. Evans - Secretary
Chairman
Evans Hotels
Gary D. Cotton - Treasurer
Senior Vice President, Customer Services
Son Diego Gas 8. Electric
Daniel O. Pcgg
President 8. CEO
Economic Development Corporation
Diredo",
Dr. Richard C. Atkinson
Chancellor
University of Coljfornia, Son Diego
Vincent E. Benstead
Post Managing Portner
Price Woremouse
Arthur E. Engel
Chairman & CEO
Southwest Marine, loe..
Motoharu lue
President & CEO
SANYO North America Corporation
lIerbert. G. Klein
Vice President & Edilor in Chief
Copley Newspapers
Robert. Kohler
Vice President &_ General Manager
TRW Avionics & Surveillance Gro~p,~
ATTACHMENT A
conomic Development Corporation
W. Daniel Larsen
President
W. Daniel lanen General Contractor
Robert. Lichter
President
John Burnham 8. (ornpany
Paul F: i\los/lcr
Post President & CEO
Kelco, Division 01 Merck 8. (0., Ine
Ted Owen
President & Publisher
Son Diego Business Journal
Gilbert Partida
President
Greater San Diego Chamber of Commerce
Robert E. Price
Presidenl & CEO
Price Enterprises, Ine.
John C. Raymond
President 8. CEO
Terrafon Corporation
Don Rushing
Co.Chair &- CEO
Groy Cory Ware & Freidenrich
Gall Stoorza.GlIl
Chairman 8. CEO
Stoorza, Ziegaus & Metzger, lne.
Victor A. Vila plana
Partner
Sheppard, Mullin, Rid1ter 8. Hampton
Robert J. Watkins
President
RJ. Walkins & Compony, ltd.
Harvey White
President
QUAlCOMM, Ine.
.'. ,_.~......-_...~-'
ItJ,,j.-
I
I
;
>
"
f
..
,
t:
,~
~~
:1
,.
I
i
~
~
~.
;'1
~
.,
~
~
f
s
.,
i~
P,TTACHi1UII G
Memorandum of Understanding
1.2 Response to Inquiries and Business Leads.
The City will continue to cooperate with the SDEDC by providing timely responses to information
requests regarding the site or building availability, incentives, permit processing and other issues related
to business development in Chula Vista, as well as to provide proactive follow-up to business referrals.
1.3 Participation in SDEDC Sponsored Events.
The City will continue to participate in and coordinate with events sponsored by the SDEDC as
appropriate and within budgetary constraints.
1.4 Availability of Chula Vista Promotional Materials.
The City will continue to provide SDEDC with promotional materials and information both
proactively and as requested to assist SDEDC in promoting the region and to highlight Chula Vista
information as appropriate.
1.5 Acknowledgement of SDEDC.
The City agrees to acknowledge SDEDC contributions which lead to the successful attraction or
retention of desirable business or development in Chula Vista.
2. SAN DIEGO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION DUTIES.
2.1 SDEDC Board and Committee Representation.
In accordance with existing SDEDC by laws as pertains to representation of funding govemment
entities (section 3.3.2) the SDEDC agrees to allow the City of Chula Vista to participate in the selection
of a Chula Vista business representative !or the SDEDC Board from a list of members in good standing
prepared by the SDEDC. The City of Chula Vista shall also be invited to appoint a Council, staff, and/or
business representative to any of the SDEDC advisory committees, (including Team San Diego Business
Advisory Board, Intemational Advisory Committee, Business News Bureau, and Cross Border Economic
DevelopmenUlntemational Trade Legislative Action Committee).
2.2 Referral of Business Leads.
The SDEDC will continue to forward all appropriate business development leads to the Economic
Development division within Chula Vista's Community Development Department in a timely manner.
Sources of leads will include, but are not limited to, the State's Trade and Commerce Agency; inquiries
generated by ad placements, conferences and trade shows, and trade missions; general "call-ins" and
"walk-ins"; and other sources, including other public or private entity referrals.
2.3 Retention Activities.
SDEDC retention efforts will include Chula Vista companies in the survey, on-site visits, and
interview process.
2.4 Promotional Materials,
SDEDC promotional materials shall integrate information regarding Chula Vista assistance
programs, development projects, special events, business trends, business support systems,
demographics, amenities and other pertinent and general informatiori as appropriate.
2.5 Public Relations.
SDEDC's public relations and image improvement program will proactively include Chula Vista
program, activities and firms, including participation in the SDEDC Business News Bureau.
[(MD)c:\wp51\c.1ocu..,enI\59795 (rev November 2,1995)] Page 2
~ J~""
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.
II
Date
1/16/96
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Reviewing and Adopting the county
of San Diego Integrated Waste Management Plan and
countywide Summary Plan and Siting Element
SUBMITTED BY: Conservation coordinator/~A
/1
/. /"'.-----
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager--!
I /
( .
4/Sth Vote: Yes
No ....JL
Staff recommends the public hearing be continued to the meeting of
2/13/96.
1/---/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
/:;..,
Item No.
Date__Ol/16/96____
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Considering enacting new gaming
plan policies and procedures regarding cardroom
ordinance 5.20 of the Municipal Code.
SUBMITTED BY:
Chief of Police
Richard P. Emerson'~ ',' '. .
/-'N\
City Manager\C:1 b"X Y"
John Goss '-...' f \
j
REVIEWED BY:
4/5 Vote: Yes
No X
staff recommends the public hearing be continued to the meeting
of January 23, 1996.
I,:L-j
INVOICE & STATEMENT
Thcf\~ ~_....,
~ tar-l~WS
V
Direct Payments to: P.O. Box 1207, Chula Vista, CA 91912
(619) 427-3000
"
'A
Mail Address:
835 Third Ave, Chula Vista, CA 91911
Date
Acel No
.~
~ PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH YOUR REMITTANCE
DESCRIPTION
INCHES
COPIES
UNIT
PRICE
CHARGES
BALANCE
i
v, t'
,
it
'j..<
r
Jd-- ~3
FORM SO - 14
CHULA VISTA STAR-NEWS ~ NATIONAL CITY STAR-NEWS ~ IMPERIAL BEACH STAR-NEWS
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Diego:
I am a citizen of the United States and
a resident of the County aforesaid; I am
over the age of eighteen years, and not
a party to or interested in the above-
entitled matter. I am the principal clerk
of the printer of the STAR-NEWS,
CHULA VISTA, a newspaper of gener-
al circulation, published TWICE-WEEK-
LY in the City of Chula Vista, and the
South Bay Judicial District, County of
San Diego, and which newspaper has
been adjudged a newspaper of general
circulation by the Superior Court of the
County of San Diego, State of
California, under the date of April 23,
1951, Case Number 164327; that the
notice, of which the annexed is a print-
ed copy (set in type not smaller than
nonpareil), has been published in each
regular and entire issue of said news-
paper and not in any supplement there-
of on the following dates, to-wit:
, .,-- .7 ,~-
'..jt
all in the year 1996
I certify (or declare) under penalty of
perjury that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Dated at CHULA VISTA
California, this c -: day of ~',". 1996
~/7 ,c/'. ~i
Signature. ~ ~zl7Zu/; /1-~~-i'~..A..~
PRI CIPLE CLERK~/
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
rV07045
Proof of Publicaton of:
PUBLIC HEJI.RI:l(;
I
~)j.
/J.. /
"
NOTICE OF PUBLIC
HEARING-BY THE CHULA
VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNI,\
NOTICE IS HEREBY G~
VEN THAT THE CHULA
, VISTA CITY COUNCIL will
hold a public hearing to,
consider thefollowing~
Enacting new. gaming
plan policies and proca-
dures r-egarding _ Cardroom
ordinance 5.20 of the Muni.
cipal Code. For further in-
lormation caJl Richard Co~
son af691-5113.
If you wish ., challenge
the City's action en this mat-
ter in court. you.may be lim-
ited to- raising only those is.
sues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing
described in this notice, or in
written correspondence de-
livered 10 the City Clerk's Of.
fice at or prior to the public
hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING
WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL on Tues.
day, January 16, 1996 al
6:00 p.m. In the Council
Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue,' at which time any
person desiring to be heard
may appear.
DATED: January 3, 1996
CV07045 1.G/96
PUBLIC HEARlNG GIECK LIST
PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE:
, .
'/ / ~. .
// /~',/" ,~:J~.
SUBJECT:
/f"-/
/'
-' ::~7?--.".J'--I-_.:...>.~
LOCATION:
_.../-;<~--.....-,-:.--
"-_-j>-,,,_~"_l"! .s....... /y~--;../' (.::~;>7r~.~C
;. - .J
'../ - ~J
, _r,'. --I>,-~.".~ ~_.~:.._J~r-?:rJ..-'
.",
" ,"
;"h:.....,-1...- ;;-,____I:t:-~~:;.~
/
-~
.--
,
~-.... .:-
-i,~7--,-,~;-.,'
~?-!...-""'):'';:::,c- r,-;-t-_/,_-c-.i:: _./.
.//'
/
/'
",- ~.
;/'--/'
~
;..n,.-'
...---",...
1/ ,..
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX.';//:; BY HAND ; BY MAlL
/ " ---,--- -
// /,/ .;;/ /
PUBLICATION DATE ' 4'/ ' u
MAlLED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS NO. MAlLED
PER GC ~S4992 Legislatlve Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego. 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
v
----
Planning
i",:> '7'''1
Originating Department
i /'
,/
/
Engineering
'-"o;.-~~'_
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
i ':7/.',
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
7/93
.55.
-I
-- -
~
~~~~
CITY Of
CHUlA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK
TELEFAX COVER LEITER
Telecopier No. (619) 585-5612
DATE:
i/?h~
/ /
TO: Star News Le~al / Manha
FAX NO: (619) 426-6346
FROM: L-~~
SUBJECf:
<") /.^
/~./~
) / .
(/v.f"'<H 'v"i
r.-/
"
TOTAL NO. PAGES (including cover): ~
PUBlJCATION DATE:
i~0~
/
If all pages are not received, please call Carla @ (619) 691-5041.
276 FOURTH AVE:lUE . CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 81810 . (618) 681.5041
~ ..---... /2 - ~,
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
Enacting new gaming plan policies and procedures regarding cardroom ordinance
5.20 of the Municipal Code. For further information call Richard Colson at 691-
5113.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on these matters in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
January 16, 1996, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: January 3, 1996
'1 /)
/~-I
Council Agenda Statement
1-"
Item : ,-I
Meeting Date 1/16/96
ITEM TITLE:
.; ", .,"--:::>,
/('-i,>r>>
Resolution Opposing Proposition 199: Limits on
Mobilehome Rent Control Low-Income Rental Assistance
Initiative Statute (formerly known as Mobilehome Rent
Assistance, Mobilehome Rent Control Restriction.)
SUBMITTED BY:
Housing Advisory Commission and Mobile Home Rent Control
Review Commission
The above referenced statewide Proposition 199, sponsored by the Western
Mobile Park Owners' Home Association, will be on the March 1996 election ballot
for a statewide public vote. In brief the proposal 1) eliminates, over time, all
existing rent restrictions on mobile homes, 2) modifies the laws controlling rents on
mobilehomes that remain subject to rent control by not restricting annual rent
increases to below the rate of inflation, 3) prevents local government from making
new laws that control mobilehome rents, 4) overturns any state law restricting
mobilehome rents and requires any future state law controlling mobilehome rents to
be approved by the voters, and 5) provides ten percent rent discounts to
mobilehome owners with very low incomes.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt a resolution to oppose Proposition 199
DISCUSSION:
On November 23, 1995 the Housing Assistance Commission voted unanimously to
oppose Proposition 199, then called Mobilehome Rent Assistance, Mobilehome
Rent Control Restrictions. On December 12, 1995 the Mobilehome Rent Control
Review Commission had two of the three present members vote to oppose this
same proposition. (See minutes of both meetings attached.)
The Housing Advisory Commission emphasized the negative effects of Proposition
199 on the low income mobilehome owners as being a hardship for those selling
their homes, and cited the lack of preservation of affordable housing for future
owners of mobilehomes. They also disapproved of the restriction on voters and
governments to monitor and intercede on the business of mobilehome park owners.
The former title of Proposition 199, "Mobilehome Rent Assistance. Mobilehome
Rent Control Restrictions.", which was current at the time of their meeting, was
another focus of criticism among the members. They also felt it over emphasized
the rent assistance being offered.
)3-(
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
The Mobilehome Rent Control Review Commission discussed the Proposition at
some length. The discussion included the debate over whether rent control is
effective and what is the role of government to participate in private property rights
issues. Advantages that were highlighted in favor of the Proposition were: 1) it
does not affect current mobilehome park residents until there is a title transfer, 2)
the market would be less distorted if no rent control is imposed and a market
driven economy may best provide for the needs of the people, and 3) it equates
the mobilehome buyer with the typical home buyer who pays more taxes than the
previous owner as the sale price increases. Disadvantages of the proposition that
were highlighted were: 1) the former title is misleading, 2) the need to sustain
affordability is underestimated, and 3) we need to be consistent in shaping policy
around our current ordinance to support rent control.
Staff recommendation was to oppose this Proposition. Given that the goal of the
City is to support opportunities that increase affordable housing, staff did not favor
such a proposal that restricts or reduces affordable housing opportunities.
As of November 15, 1995 over 60 cities and nine counties (out of 460 cities and
57 counties) throughout the State are on record as opposing Proposition 199. (See
attached letter from the Mayor of the City of San Marcos requesting our Mayor to
take an opposing stand to Proposition 199.) About 100 cities and counties have
laws restricting the amount of space rent mobilehome park owners may charge. In
response to a letter from the California League of Cities requesting opposition to
the initiative, which was only a petition being circulated at that time. The City
Council of Chula Vista voted to join the opposition on June 7, 1994. Now that this
petition has been formalized into a Proposition and the Chula Vista Council make up
has changed, we are respectfully asking the Council to reaffirm their opposition.
Following is a summary of the Proposing and Opposing Arguments:
PROPONENTS' ARGUMENTS FOR PROPOSITION 199
The proponents of Proposition 199 argue first that vacancy decontrol will increase
the accessibility of mobilehome living by increasing the supply and by reducing the
total cost of such housing. They advocate that rent control artificially increases the
resale price of mobilehomes by thousands of dollars, making units less affordable.
Their belief is that it is the inflated resale prices of mobilehomes, not the monthly
pad rents, that create the biggest obstacle to affordable mobile home housing.
Thus, they say, Proposition 199 will help stop the decline of affordable housing in
California. Secondly, proponents argue that Proposition 199 protects the current
tenants since the phasing out of rent control only occurs when there is a title
transfer or sublease of the property. They also say that by restoring market forces,
younger families who are currently denied access because of the effects of local
13-:(
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
rent regulations, will have improved access. Thirdly, proponents advocate that
Proposition 199 protects the truly needy by providing the very low income
mobilehome owners an opportunity to receive rent discounts (equal to 10 percent
of the average rent price in the respective park) subsidized by the mobilehome park
owner. It is their belief that currently poor and fixed income persons are denied
affordable housing because rent regulations inflate mobilehome resale prices.
OPPONENTS' ARGUMENTS AGAINST PROPOSITION 199
Opponents view this initiative as fraudulent because 1) it eliminates all government
authority to control or monitor park owners' business, 2) the park owners are free
to charge any amount for rent, 3) rental assistance will be calculated after rent
prices have been increased and then only for very low income families, 4) existing
rent control will be phased out upon sale, transfer and sublease of such spaces and
5) the park owners are required to provide "not more than" ten percent of the
spaces with any combination of subsidy and rent control, thus they could provide
zero percent of the spaces with discounts.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Direct fiscal impact of Proposition 199 on the City would be minimal. Currently,
estimated staff costs to administer the Mobile Home Rent Control Ordinance are
$20,000 per year. Additionally, there is the potential that eliminating rent control
for mobilehome parks would increase the land value of the parks resulting in
increased property taxes. However, the City only receives approximately 15% of
1 % of the increased property value, when a mobilehome park is sold, which will be
a minimal amount and an infrequent occurrence.
Indirectly, the impact could be substantial as the City loses its affordable housing
units, increases its homeless population and burdens families' lives resulting in
demands for other social services. In the long term, any potential savings for the
City in staff time would be reallocated to these other services. Exact costs to
administer these additional services cannot be assessed at this time.
13-3/r3-1/
RESOLUTION NO.
/V / .\(:-
i 1, c, ...)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
OPPOSING PROPOSITION 199 ENTITLED LIMITS ON MOBILEHOME RENT
CONTROL LOW-INCOME RENTAL ASSISTANCE INITIATIVE STATUTE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has a long history of
protecting mobile home residents from rent gouging and poor mobile home management
practices; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has continued to assist
the mobile home community in effecting and enforcing their rights as residents within
mobilehome parks; and
WHEREAS, opponents of mobilehome rent control have qualified a statewide
proposition on the ballot in the March 26, 1996 election for the purposes of limiting or
eliminating mobilehome rent control on a statewide or local basis.
NOW THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, determine and resolve that they do hereby
go on record in opposition to Proposition 199 or any statewide initiative which would
eliminate or reduce the authority of the local agencies, including Charter provisions in a
City's charter, to effect protection in the form of mobile home rent control for mobile
home parks within the City of Chula Vista or in any other community within the State of
California.
PRESENTED BY:
Housing Advisory Commission and
Mobile Home Rent Control Review Commission
(BB:IC:IWP51ICOUNCILIRESOSIPROP-199.RESI
13-5-1)3-~
DRAFT
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MINUTES
MOBILEHOME RENT REVIEW COMMISSION
Tuesday December 12, 1995
4:00 p.m.
Council Conference Room
City Hall Building
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL - 4:05 p.m.
PRESENT:
Steven Thomas, Carl Grieve, Peter Watry
ABSENT:
Jeanne Reynolds
STAFF:
Housing Coordinator Arroyo, Community Development
Specialist I Schott, Administrative Office Assistant II Gonzalez
EX-OFFICIO:
Earl Biggers (Present)
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MCS (Watry/Grieve) to December 15,1994
minutes, (3-0-1 Reynolds absent).
Mr. Arroyo introduce Sheri Schott who is the new Community Development
Specialist who replaced Sheila Shanahan. Sheri will be assigned to address some
mobilehome issues. Sheri will be briefing the Commission and presentir:g some
background information pertaining proposition 199.
Member Grieve asked if Sheri will be the point of contact for the various residents
in the parks as well.
Mr. Arroyo responded that at this point there are two people involved. Sheri is
assigned primarily to research policy issues that are pending. Cases of complaints
pertaining to rent notices, procedures, etc. will be assigned to Judy Foland.
Eventually these tasks will be assigned to one person.
2. DISCUSSION AND ACTION CONCERNING PROPOSITION 199 - Ms. Schott
briefly went over the materials that were provided to the Commission Members.
Ms. Schott stated that Proposition 199 which is also referred to Mobilehome Rent
Assistance - Mobilehome Rent Control Restrictions was started out as a petition
and didn't become a full pledge initiative until October 1993. It recently was
assigned the number Proposition 199 and will appear in the 1996 March election
ballot.
When this issue was at the petition stage, it was brought to the City Council's
attention and the City Council voted to oppose this issue in June 1994. Since then
the City has a new Mayor and City Council so staff is taking this issue to the City
Council again. In addition, staff presented this issue to the Housing Advisory
\~'\
Commission and they voted to opposed it as well.
Ms. Schott briefly went over the pros of Proposition 199. Mobile home park
owners advocate this as an opportunity to free up the government from
unnecessary red tape. Also it allows the park owners to give direct assistance to
the tenants who need assistance. Unrestricted rent controls jeopardize their ability
to proviJe affordable housing. Limiting 10% of park spaces for rent assistance
subsidy will adequately meet the need without burdening the park owners. The
10% cut is based on the average rent within the park.
This has received a lot of criticism from the tenants as well as from some of the
local jurisdictions. Some of the objections are as follows: Elimination of any
control, monitoring, and regulations that the government has imposed before. In
addition, the 10% cut that the mobilehome owners are giving, may not be enough
assistance to the very low income families. Also it is open to predatory pricing
in the sense that they can set the prices in order to manipulate the market and are
able to over charge on a property to influence the sale ability of the adjacent
properties. In other words, if there is no control over predatory pricing, it can keep
certain people out and can actually harm opportunities given to the tenants. The
current rent control will eventually be a leakage as every property is sold, it will be
freed of its rent control. There will be no rent control imposed on that property
from then on. Another piece of criticism gathered is that the owners profit is 4
times higher than apartment owners are giving. Their profit is averaging 68% to
72%.
Ms. Schott briefly went over the Cons of Proposition 199. Mobilehome park
tenants and others viewed this initiative as fraudulent because it eliminates all
government authority to control or monitor park owners' business. Provisions of
rental assistance will be determined by each park management/owner giving no
assurance of affordability standards. Existing rent control will be phased out upon
sale, transfer and sublease of such spaces and the park owners are not required to
provide more than 10% of the spaces with any combination of subsidy and rent
control. And lastly, the park owners are free to charge any mount for rent without
restrictions.
Trying to present this in an objective perspective there are arguments that can be
made for both sides. Staff has reviewed it and recommend that it should not be
supportive because it is restricting the opportunities for affordable housing to
families who need it.
Ex-Officio Biggers wanted a clarification on the 10% feature, doesn't it also limit
the number of spaces by 10%.
Ms. Schott responded yes, there are two references to 10%. If there are 200
spaces, only 20 spaces will be eligible for assistance. Another reference to the
10% was that assistance meant 10% of the average rent price.
\~-~
Fred Dufresne, who resides at Otay Lakes Mobilehome Park, commented on
Proposition 199. He stated that this issue is going to create a tremendous burden
on the residents that reside in mobilehome parks. Many of the parks are senior
mobilehome parks. Most of the residents are single who have lost a spouse, which
means living on a single income. Many of these residents would qualify for the
10%, but never wr,uld see it because of the 10% ratio. Another small group are
family residents that are very low income. The expenses in a mobilehome are just
like maintaining a home. The point is, the owners want to eliminate the City to
control or monitor their business.
Bob Flaugher, who resides at Orange Tree Mobilehome Park, commented on
Proposition 199. The owners are raising the rents high to make a profit regardless
of the tenants ability to pay. Most of the mobilehome owners do not fix the parks
or bring them up to code, Mr. Flaugher recommends to oppose Proposition 199.
He also stated that this proposition would take his right to vote against mobilehome
rent control.
Marie Scrivener, who resides at Chula Vista Mobilehome Park, commented on
Proposition 199. She stated that she is a widow and lives on a single income. At
the present time she is financially fine, but if the rent control is taken away from
the CPI then she will begin to have financial problems. She suggests to the
Commission to oppose this Proposition because it will be a disaster to so many
mobile home residents.
Sal Roskin, who resides at Granda Mobile Estates, also commented on Proposition
199. He expounded on what the previous people stated regarding Proposition 199.
This proposition states that it gives assistance to mobilehome residents, but
actually it will eliminate rent control.
Dennis Chaffee, President of Local Chapter GSMOL, resides in Chula Vista Mobile
Home Park, stated that Proposition 199 is misleading. He stated that the park
owners want to fool the public into thinking that they are going to help the
residents when actually they are helping themselves to more profits. He believes
that further down the line maybe in a year or two, that they will put another
proposition on the ballot to eliminate rent control all together. He recommends to
the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission Members to oppose Proposition 199.
Ex-Officio Member Biggers stated that the results of the petition is not only doing
away with rent control, but when it comes time for the current owndrs to sell then
that's when the greatest loss will come, the value of the mobilehome. Because the
rent can be raised on the individual mobilehome without any rent control.
Member Grieve stated that he is opposing Proposition 199 because he is against
the way it's written, the title is misleading, and there are too many things in it that
make it one sided.
I~-~
Member Thomas also stated that the title of Proposition 199 is misleading. He also
stated that this proposition does not effect people that already live in mobilehomes.
It only effects the new people that would be moving in mobilehomes.
Member Thomas commented on the memorandum under cons number four,
regarding the park owners are free to charge any amount of rent without
restrictions. Its not without restriction at least in terms of what the market will
maintain. The biggest restriction in any premarket exchange is what the market
will pay. So it's not without restriction or other alternatives as much as there may
not be governmental restriction, for there are whole host of forces that come into
play in the open market.
Member Thomas questioned section 2 a2 under the ballot measure, that the
mobilehome rent control apparently effects only 5% of all housing units. Of those
that are effected, generally there is no means testing for those persons that are in
mobilehome parks. So his question was, what is the cost of administrating the
programs in general and how many people benefit from it. Also he mention that
the pros and cons memo did not include a fiscal impact.
Mr. Arroyo responded that the City Council agenda statement will provide more
detail and will include a fiscal impact.
Member Watry stated that there are two issues. The purpose of this proposition is
to due away with rent control. Until Council makes the choice to go back to the
market system, it is the Commission's duty to enforce it. The basic decision is,
does the City of Chula Vista want to stick with rent control. The second issue is
that there are some things that the government has to do that applies to everyone.
Other situations each city can do there own thing. Here's an attempt where the
State wants to 'Nipe out all the local jurisdictions on rent control and there is no
justification for that. Chula Vista shouldn't have the same law as Santa Rosa,
Bakersfield or somewhere else. Member Watry rejects Proposition 199 on the
basis he just stated,
Member Grieve stated that if this proposition passes, in essence there won't be
affordable housing and rent control. The mobilehome residents state that they are
better off under the Chula Vista Municipal Ordinance,
Mr, Arroyo stated that the Commission's decision on this issue will be a
recommendation to the City Council.
Member Grieve questioned whether the City of Chula Vista wants to be a bedroom
community that can only afford certain kinds of people. Or does the City want to
continue to have affordable housing and the only way is to have some kind of
control by the City.
\~ -ID
(Watry/Grieve) that the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission oppose Proposition
199 and support Council's recommendation, 3-0-1 Reynolds absent).
3. ORAL COMMENTS - None
4. STAFF COMMENTS - None
5. MEMBERS COMMENTS - Member Grieve asked how many owners
supported the ordinance at the Mobilehome Rent Review meetings.
Mr. Arroyo responded that based on staff's records, 10 park owners have
expressed support for the ordinance throughout the process.
Member Thomas asked that staff compile a list of rents in mobilehome parks.
Member Thomas asked if there was an update on the litigation regarding pass-
throughs at Otay Lakes Lodge.
Mr. Arroyo responded that it is still pending.
Member Grieve asked if there was any action taken on any civil suits regarding loss
of view.
Mr. Arroyo responded no.
Member Grieve asked when can this Commission expect a replacement for Andrew
Delgado.
Mr. Arroyo responded that staff submitted Andrew's resignation to the Mayor's
office who is expected to appoint a new member.
6. ADJOURNMENT - 5:40 p.m. to the next meeting at the call of the Chair.
Recorder, Alicia Gonzalez
[AG\C:\WPWIN\ 12.12.95.MINI
\'~-I\
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MINUTES
HOUSING ADVISORY COMMISSION
DRAFT
Wednesday November 22, 1995
3:30 p.m.
Conference Room 2
Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL - 3:35 p.m.
PRESENT:
Chair Madrid, Members Helton, Flaugher, Lopez-Gonzalez
ABSENT:
Alonso-Massey, Worth
STAFF:
Housing Coordinator Arroyo, Community Development
Specialist I Schott
EX-OFFICIO:
Lembo (present), Mayfield (absent)
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - (Flaugher/Helton) to approve October 30, 1995
minutes, (4-0-2 Alonso-Massey, Worth absent).
2. OTAY RANCH AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLAN - (Helton/Flaugher) to
recommend the adoption of both the Ranch-Wide and SPA One Affordable Housing
Plans for Otay Ranch, (4-0-2 Alonso-Massey, Worth absent).
3. MOBILEHOME RENT ASSISTANCE - (Madrid/Lopez-Gonzalez) to oppose
Proposition 199, (4-0-2 Alonso-Massey, Worth absent).
(Madrid/Flaugher) to excuse Members Alonso-Massey and Worth from November
22, 1995 meeting due to out of town and other commitments (4-0-2 Alonso-
Massey, Worth absent).
(Helton/Flaugher) to cancel the Housing Advisory Commission meeting for
December 27,1995 because the City will be closed from December 22, 1995 to
January 1, 1996 (furlough) (4-0-2 Alonso-Massey, Worth absent).
4. STAFF REPORTS - None
5. MEMBERS COMMENTS - None
6. ADJOURNMENT - to the next scheduled meeting of January 24, 1996.
IAGIC'\1'.22-95.MINJ
\~-,~
Ol,lU/UU lO:~<1
"O.iHt) <tq7 3<141
hQVOCElLl.on. lI.l.C.
4:!J UI.JC:SI U.Ltt
PltOPOSIT10N 1"
THE MOBILEJIOME RENT ASSISTANCE AND
MOBILEHOME RENT CONTROL RESTRICTIONS INITIATIVE
TEXT OF THE PROPOSAL WHICH wn.L BE SUBIv1u u:u TO THE VOTERS ON
MARCH 26, 1m.
SEC710N 1: TITLE
Thilli Mealliure shall. be known and may be citad as The Moi)iIehomll Fairness and
Remal Assistance Act.
SEC710N 2: FlNOINGS ANO OeCLARATlONS OF PURPOSE
Coal TIle People of the State at CaIIfomla find and dldant aa fClUows:
C1 l Some tenants of mobilehome """..... in mabllehame partes In Califarr1i3
are POQr and needy and are urgently in neea at rIIm3I ..-.....nee. without delays. ~ense
or red tace which state and local gQvernmem usually recPres far the adminimatian at
rental assi:s-t2nce grograms: and
C21 Over 80 local governmentS are spm'Iding milBons at dollars annuauv
admInistering and enforcing motlilehomo park rent _..... fer U1e tUlCtusive benef"1t af
owners of mobilehomes ....hich comprise ~PraXimaaSIY anly 5-pen:ent of California's
housing I,mits witt! W1restricted controls that are IIIB111n1l1V not means tested to th. paar. sa
1hat mObilehome awners in mobilehomes with an awragll value of t40.000 to 050,000
oetain unfair orica CCl'ltr01S in rant Controlled area a Ute expense of small
bUSlness-oarkowners and all the citizens of ~arnia: and
(3) Then unrestrictlld controls jeoparai%e the uistence of .fforalltlle
mocilehcme oark housing far all Californians and /eapardim cgntil1l.lod employment and
small bus'ness-1l3rko....ners. existence in c:.lifamia: and
(4) Requiring the provision at direct remaI assistance subsidies by r.quiring
n'lobilehome oarle owner~ ta llrovide soecified reciucacl rentS tor the goor. togettler wren the
lim.tatlans On most restnc~:l1e feanues of rent limitations which have adversely aftecwd
~---
\~-)'~
OlllUdHj lU.~<J
Ul:flb 0101/ '>"'11
n.\A~ U\..-~L,lvll. ..lll\,...
Igj"n.'i:;li Ul.<.I
the availability and supply of such aHordable 'mobile home housing, it; nec:es:;ary to lIs:;ure
the continued availllbility of affordable mobile home housing to the poor; and
. .
"
, .
(51 The limitation of the rental assistance subsidy provided in this Measure
to not more than ten,percent of the spaces In a single mobilehome parle will provide a
reasonable amount of assistance to needy mobilehome p,ark tenarns. without unduly
burdening the property interests of the mobilehome parle owner.
(bl It is therefore the intent of the People of the State of California in enacting this
Measure to do all 9f the following as a matter of statewide concern:
(' I Require owners of mobil.home parks to grant dirllctfy, withOUt
governmental administration. rental assistance subsidies to not more tllan ten-percem of
their mobilehome space tenants. . ,
(21 Require local governments to minimize their mObilehome park rent control
measures by allowing annual rent increases equal to the cost of liiAng end require local
governments to phase out rent control administration, on a Splice by space basis., upon the
sale. transfer or sublease of any mobiJehome.
(31 Prohibit enactment of any new mobilehome PlIrk rent conuol or rent
stabiliution law by any local government or by the State of California.
(c) This Measure is not intended, nor Shall it be con5trued, to deprive any
mobi/ahome Owner. tenant or mobilehome park owner of any constitutional tights.
SECTION 3: AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1 OF DIVISION 2 OF CAUFORNIA CIVIL CODE:
DEFINITIONS
Chapter 1 of Part :4 of Division 2 of the California Civil Code is hereby amended as follows
by adding new Section ?S8. 13, a:;; follows: '
798.'3
As used in this part. the following terms have the follClwing meanings:
la) "Tenant" means II homeowner as defined .in Section 798.9 of this Chapter.
(b) "Qualified Tenant" means any tenant who. as of the data ofapplir;:ation. and
during any periOd while receiving a rental assistance subsidy, satisfies.1I of the following
requirementS: '
(1) The tenant resides in a mobilehome park in the State of California; and
(21 The tenant is a very low income household. as defined in section 50105
at the ClIlitornia Health and Safety Code; lInd
[3) The tenllnt is not delinquent with any rental payments. has estabUshed a
legal residency in a mobilehame. and owns and occupies such mobllehome as the tenant's
principal place at residence: and
2
\~ .l~
01, .lU/ ~U
ill."-",
Cftl.ll> 'l':t, '>':t':l,
I1.i.... V,-,tl~. .l.\.Jil, .Lu\....
~V.l.V( v.l.<J
(41 The tenant. including all other residents regularly residing in the
mobilehome. is in compliance with alllules end regulations of the mobile home perk and the
tenant's rental agreement; and
- (51 The tenant is not receiving any Federal, State or local housing
assistance, including but not limited to assistance under Chapter 8 (commencing with
section 1404a) of Title 42. United States Code: The Housing and Community Development
Act of 1974 (PubliC law 93-3831: Chapter 45 Icommencing with section 3601 I of Title
42. United State Code; or eny other 90vernmental housing assistance program
adminiatered by the Department of Housing and Urb8n Development or as provided by
other state or federal laws or programs.
Icl -RentalllSsistance subsidy" 8S used in Article 4.4 of this part means a ten-
percent discount from the monthly rent charged for the mobllehome space occupied by
one or more qualified tenants, as established by mobile home park management (the
pre-subsidy monthly rent levell. The pre-subsidy monthly rent level of a qualified tenant
who is receiving or is entitled to receive. a rental assistance subsidy. may be increased and
shall be decreased, as appropriate, from time to time, $0 that the pre-subsidy monthly rent
level shall not. at any time, exceed the average monthly rent level charged for all spaces In
the mobilehome part then occupied with mobilehomes.
Only one rental assistance subsidy shllllspply to IIny mobilehome space
regerdless of how many qualified tenants who reside in a mobilehome space. so that no
mobilehome space shall be entitled to more than one ten-percent discount from the
pre-SUbsidy monthly rent level.
"-"
ldl "Exempt space" liS used in Article 4.5 of this part means (iJ any space .n a
mobilehome park which is not occupied by a mobilehome 8S of the effective date of this
Measure. or ffil any space which is, as of the effective date of this Measure, exempt from
a mobilehome parI: rent control iaw as a result of any lease or remalllgreement covering
such space including, without limitation, a rental agreement described in section 798.17 of
this ChaPter.
(e) "MobilehOme park rent control" as used in Articles 4.4 end 4.5 of this 'lart
means any ordinence, rule. regulation, or initiative measure. adopted by any city, county or
city and county. which establishes a maximum amount that the management of a
mobilehome park may charge any tenant or resident for rent.
(f) "Decontrolling event" as used in Article 4.5 of this part means. with respect to
any space in a mobilehome park covered bv a mobilehome park rent control law as of the
effective date of this Measure. the occurrence of eny of the following events after the
effective date of this Measure: (I) Any sale, transfer (by foreclosure. operation of law or
otherwise), or other change in ownership of the mobilehome (as defined in Section 798.3
of this Chapter); (iil Any termination of the tenancy of the persons who are tenants in such
space by eviction. voluntary vacancy or otherwise; or (iii) Any 5utHease by the tenant to a
third parry of the mobilehcme or space after the effective date of this Measure', provided
nothing contained herein is intended to authorize any such sub-lease of the mobile home or
space. Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivisions (i). (iii, and (iiil herein. no
decontrolling event shall be deemed to have occurred upon any transfer of ownership of a
mobilehome to the conservator. guardian or trustee of a homeowner or to a homeowner's
'''_0.
3
\~ -IS
OL 10(96 lU; ~6
6'1116 H7 JH7
Advucatl0n. Inc.
Ij!) U11/015
, .
I'
nust (provided that the beneficiaries entitled to ownership of the mObilehome ere members
of the homeowner's immediate family). or to a surviving spouse upon the death of ~e
other spouse, or to a spouse or the parentis) or children of a homeowner.
"
i..
(gl .Subsidized rental cherge" means the amOunt of rent chargeable to the Qualified
tenant under this Measure. atter deducting the rental assistance subsidy from the rent
otherwise lawfully chargeable to the tenant.
SECTION 4: ,AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 2..5 OF DIVISION 2 OF THE CALIFORNIA CIVIL
CODE
Chapter 2.5 of Part 2 of Division 2 of the California Civil Code is hereby amended as
follows by adding a new Article 4.4, as fOllows:
Article 4.4 Tenant Rental A,.si~tance
798.44.1 Any Qualified tenant may apply for and if aCCepted. shell receive. directly from
the management of 8 mobilehome parI< in which such tenant resides. a rental assis;:ance
subsidy subjec;: to the terms and conditions provided for in this Article.
798.44.2 The :;,rovision of the rental assistance subSidy shall be the sole responsibilitY
and obligation of each management of a mobilehome park end neither the State of
Califomia nor any governmental agency shall heve any responsibility therefor or exercise
any authority in connection therewith, eXCept 8S provided in Section 798.44.6 of this
Artic'e.
798.44.3 /al Each tenant seeJcing to Obtain a rental assistance subsidy shall provide the
management with an application. together with competent evidence of facts. to prove the
tenant is a Qualified tenant. This application and evidence may be submitted at any time
during any calendar year up to Oecember 15 for consideration of the rental a~stance
subsidy for the ensuing calendar year commencing January, 1. The evidence
accompanying the application shaH consist of ownerShip and reSidency in the mobilehome
and such income end other infonnation as is customarily reouired by the governmental
agency administering the housirig assistance benefits for Very I.Ow Irlcome persons under
SeCtion 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. sec. 1437) and such other
evidence as is reasonably reQuired. However; no mobilehOme park management shall
make this applIcation process more burdensome to the tenant than would be the cllse if
the tenaor were applying for housing assistance benefitS for Very I.ow Income persons
under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. sec. 1437).
Cbl Each mobilehome parI< management shall. promPtly upon receiPt of such
application and evidence specified in paragraph lal. evaluate the same and repiy to such
tenant with notice within 10 working dayS. The reply shall.indicate either (1 I Dcceptance,
in which case the amount of the rental assistance subsidy and the pre-subsidy r,'onthJy
rent level shall then be srated; or '(2) rejection_ in which caSe the basis for such rejection
shall also be stated. Once a Qualified Tenent ~ received a rentel assistance Subsidy
during any part of a calendar year. the rental assistance subsidy shall continue until
December 31 of that year, subject to early termination lIS provided in this Article.
.:.
\~#)lD
OlfJ..U196 iU.2i
691Ll ~.,}; 3,,4 i
A'1~'(),-a1 ),)11, lIlC.
798.44.4
Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article to the c:ontrerv:
lal [11 In any jurisdiction in which mobilehome park rent control is in effect. the
management of a mobilehome park shall be ex~mpt from the rental assistance subsidy
provisions of this Article if. and as long as. more than ten-percent of the spaces occupied
by mobilehomes in such mobilehome park are covered by any form of mobilehome park
rent control.
121 In any jurisdiction in which mobilehome park rent control Is in.Heel. if at
any time fewer then ten-percent of the spaces occupied by mobilehomDli in 8 mobilehame
park ere covered by any form of mObilehome park rent comrol. the management Of e
mobilehome park shall be subject to the provisions of this Article and shall be required to
provide rental assistance subsidy to a qualified tenant: provided. however. thet the
management of the mobilehome park shell not be required to prOvide such remal
assi:ltance subsidy if granting the liubsidy would result In more than ten-percent of the
spaces in the mobllehome park being covered either by any form of mobilehome park rent
control or by the rental assistance SUbsidy provided by this Article. The priority for
gr;mting rental assistance subsidy shall be governed by subdivi:;ion leI of this liection
798.44.4. .
(b) In any jurisdiction in which there is no form of mobilehome peri< rent control in
effect. tha management of.a mobilehome perk shell be required to provide the rental
assistance subsidy provided by this Article to Qualified tenants representing not more than
ten-percent of the spaces then occupied by mobilehOmes in such mobilehome park. The
prioritY for granting rental assistance subsidy shall be governed by subdivision Ie) of this
section 798.44.4.
~.
lcl (11 In circumstances In which subdivision la1(2) or subdivision Ib) of this
section apply. the management of a mobilehome park lihall be required to grent the rentel
assistance subsidy provided fer in this Article to those qualified tenants who are first in
time to have been granted a rental assistance subsidy by the management of the
mobilehome park.
(21 In d~termining the number of qualified tenants to which the management
of a mobilehome park shall be required to provide remal as.sistance undar subdivision
(e)(21. the management of the mobilehome park shall determine the number of qualified
tenants which represent spaees entitled to the rental subsidy. by subtracting the number
of spaces then subject to some form of mobilehome park rent control from the number
representing ten-percent of the total number of spaces then occupied by mobile homes in
the mobilehome park.
798.44.!5 (a) Any qualified tenant receiving a rental assistance subsidy shall loSe the right
to such rental assistance subsidy upon tha occurrence of IIny of the following events;
(1) The tenant fails to pay the monthly rent in accordance with 1tla rental
agreement (as reduced by the rental assistanca sUbsidyl within five days of its due dete:
or
121 The tenant no longer meets the criteria for a Qualified tenant for any
re8$Oll.
'-/
5
l~ -\1
01110(96 10: 26
1:\'916 447 3447
Advocation, Inc.
Ii!J 013/015
. .
(bl The mobilehome park management may, upon 10 days' written notice to the
tenant. terminate the tenant's rental assistance subsidy for a reason specified in
paragraphs (11 or (21 of subdivision (al.
(c) A tenant whose rental assistance subsidy has been terminated pursuant to
subdivision (bl may not reapply for rental assistance subsidy for a period of 12 months
thereafter.
(d) For purposes of the ten.-percent limitation set forth in section 798.44.4. a rental
assistance subsidy ~rminated pursuant to subdivision (bl shall be deemed to have been
terminated on the last day of the calendar year.
'798.44.6. Any qualified tenant aggrieved or damaged by any substantial violation of this
Article may petition the municipal court of the iudicial district in whiCh the mobilehome
park is located for a jUdicial determination of his or her rights under this Article. An
aggrieved tenant prevailing in such an action shall be entitled to lalllctulll damages
consisting of the amount of rental assistance subsidy lost due to the violation and (bl
reasonable attorneys fees and cOsts. A tenant aggrieved by a violation of thls ArtiCle shall
also be entitled to seek injunctive relief. and ,my other equitable remedies available under
section 526 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
A judgment of the .municipal court shall be reviewable by the appellate department
of the superior court of the county in whiCh the action arose.
798.44.7. (al A mobllehome parK'S management shall not terminate the tenancy of any
tenant. or attempt to do so, or retaliate against any tenant. or attempt to do so, as a
proximate result of a request by that tenant for a rental assistance SUbsidy or thl exercise
of any rights relating thereto as provided in this Article.
(b) Any demand by a mobillhome park's manaeement for rent in excess of the
subsidized rental charge from any qualified tanant whose application 10r a rental assistance
subsidy is approved for the calendar year or whose application was denied or rejected in .
violetion of this. Article shall constitute a defense to any action brought by the mobllehome
park management for (1) the excess rent over the subsidized rentell chargl: or (21 eviction
of the qualified tenant from the mobile home park for non-payment of that excess rent.
However, this subdivision does not apply if enforcemem of the subsidized rental charge
would violate any constitutional right of the owner of the mObilehome park to a fair rate of
return. .
SECTION 5: AMENDMENT OF ARTICLE 4.5 OF PART 2 OF DIVISION 2 OF THE
CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE
Article 4.5 of Part 2 of Division 2 of the California Civil Code is amended to add the
following new Sections 798.46.1.798.46.2. and 798.46.3 as follows:
798.46.1 On or afterthe effective date of this Me<lsure. no city. county. or city and
county. shall. (8) enact any new mobilehome perk rent control law or (bl amend or modify
any existing mobilehome park rent control law to apply its restriction on maximum rents to
any space in a mobile home park which is not, on the. effective date of this Measure. by
6
\~~\t
reason of a long term lease or otherwise. subject to rent rutrictiDnS under the n:'obilehome
park rent contro/law.
79B.46.2 Every mobilehome park rent controll~ in effect as of the effective date of
this Measure shall be subject to the following provisions:
(a) On or after January 1 of the year following the effective date of this Maasura.
no mobilehome park. rent conrrollaw may. with respect to the rent which a mobile home
park management may charge for a space within such park. either (j) require that the rent
for such space ever be rllduclld frOl'l'l that lawfully charged before the effective date of thiS
Measure or liS of eny subsequent date. or Iii) fimit any annual rent Increase to an amount
which is less than the full annual cost of nving increese, as measured by the change in
such cost of living from the 12-month period entling in the calendar month preceding the
date in which a notice of rent increase is given by the mobllehome park management at.
any time, and from time to time. after the effective date of this Measure.
For purposes of this paragraph. the cost of living shall be determined using
the California Consumer Price Index ("eCP'"), as published by the Department of Industrial
Relations for all items and all urban consumers. and this index for the 1982-1984 period
shllll be computed liS 100.
(b) No jurisdiction. administering any mobiiehome park rent contTollaw shall require
the management of a mobilehome park to attend any hearin9 or submit any information to
such jurisdiction so long liS mllnagement limitll the rental inereaaea for any space affected
by such mobilehome park rent contrOl lilW to the full annual CCPI increase as provided in
subdivision (a) of this section.
.~ (c) On or after the effective date of this Measura, no mobnahome park rent control
law shall impose any restriction whatsoever on the amount of rent that the management of
a mobilehome park may charge for a mobllehome space within such park upon or after a
decontrolling event, as defined in Section 798.13 (f).
(d) On or after the effective date of this Measure, no mobilehome park rent control
law shall Impose any restriction whatsoever on the amount of rent that the management of
a mobil.home park may charge for a space within such park which is an exempt space. as
defined in Section 796.13 (dl. All exempt spaces shall be. for all purposes on or aftllr the
effective date of this Mellsure, exempt from any eod all mobiiehome park rent control
laws.
798.46.3 The State of California shall enact no statute restricting. or authorizing the
restriction of. the maximum amount of rent that the management of e mobilehOl'l'le park
may charge for a space in a m!>bilehome park. Any statute having that effect and enacted
before or after the effective dare of this Measure shall be void and unenforceable.
SECTION 6: AMENDMENT OR REPEAL OF MEASURE
The provisions of this Measure may be amended or repellled by ~he procedures set
forth in this section. If any portion of subdivision (al is declared invalid. then subdivision
(b) shall be the exclusive rneans of amending or repealing this title.
,~.
7
,~ -)0,
01,'10(96 10: 29
fS'916 447 3447
Advocation, Inc.
Ii!J 015(015
(al The provisions of this Measure may be amended to further its purposes by
statute. passed in each house by rollcall vote entered in the journal. two-thirds of the
membership concurring and signed by the Governor.
(bl The provisions of this Measure may be amended or repealed by a statute that
becomes effective only when approved by the electors.
SECTION 7; EFFECTiVE DATE
The effective date of this Measure shall be the dey efter the election at which it is
l'Pproved by the votets.
SECTlON 8: CONSTRUCTION OF MEASURE
The Mel'sure shall be liberally construed to llchieve the purposeS ot this Measure
and to preserve its validity.
SECTION 9: SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Measure, or the application to any person or circumstances
is held invalid or void. such invalidity or voidness shall not aff.ect other provision5 or.
applications which can be given effect without the invalid or void provision or application,
and to this end. all of the provisions of this Measure are declared to be severable.
SECTION 10: ELECTORS' INTENTION IN THE EVENT OF PASSAGE OF POSSIBLE
CONFLICTING MEASURES
In the event another Measure to be voted on by the voters at the same election as
this MM'3ure. and which constitutes a comprehensive regulatory scheme. receives more
affirmative votes than this Measure. the electors intend that any provision or provisions of
this Measure not in direct and apparent conflict with eny provision or provisions of another
Measure, shall not be deemed to be in conflict therewith, and shall be severed from any
other provision or provisions of this Measure which are in direct and apparent conflict with
the provision(s) of another Measure. In such event. tl'le p,ovisions shall be severed
according to the provisions of Section 9 of this Measure upon application to lIny court of
competent jurisdiction.
8
\~..~
I Civic Center Drive
San Marcos. CA 92069-2949
i O~ I"
UU DFC 2 2 'QO~
III
I' ,II
IW'
l Telep "n~'lllJ" ',<;
1- ' r v\c;lt Ct
FAX: (6191 744-7643
c..vu ~r'''''16
December 18, 1995
Mayor Shirley Horton
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: Opposition to Proposition 199
Dear Mayor Horton:
The City Council of the City of San Marcos has asked that I forward to
you, for appropriate action, a resolution by the City of San Marcos opposing
the recently renamed and numbered Proposition 199 - Mobilehome Rent
Assistance. Mobilehome Rent Control Restrictions Initiative.
As you are probably aware, this is an initiative that has nothing to do
with mobilehome park rental fairness, but is a thinly veiled disguise by the
mobilehome park owners to abuse the residents through a misleading statewide
initiative.
Hopefully you will agree and also take an active role in opposing this
misleading abuse of the statewide initiative process.
If you have any questions regarding this initiative, please feel free to give
me or my City Manager, Rick Gittings, a call at 744-1050, Ext. 3118.
Sincerely,
1!.~~
Mayor
FHS:RWG:sv
cc: City Council
City Manager
\~-;l.l
F. H. .Corky. Smith, Mayor Pia Harris-Ebert, Vice-Mayor Betty Evans
Darrell W. Gentry
Richard C. Yocum
Qfj'-rH E B / C
~'
< f 'P/?o P /99
~Q/h/.G ~~I 7?~Alr ~SSlsr~,vc~
A1/)fJ1/.FHel'lL "'F,,4/r~~,vTR#L fi11'7i;;;fA
,\ "
rifE 18 /6- LIE 11/1 S B EE",A/ ~xPos~o NY r), p _
J1A7~ -47To/?A/~Y c;.~.vt'I?;1I.. pff'()p /'19 IS A/tJw A ,#/'t"ASt/1.
ro)PE srI( ler ?JoSLE IIO/1E 7?E ,A/;
Co IV;/( 0 L. II -tl/Ei/?uc- /,4//EA/T ttr FRdP /~
E 1-'1: ~ V P/J1i'1t' ifF S /,0 E..vT fiJ tI Jr /9 7T c,v O.Jh (#_J2f5/f)~
/
hf~E.n,v9 {I r~li'. /99~ ~T t&UIJEJilldcf
_CE/VTEI? 315 OX FtJl?_~_)C.. __/~ ~
CHuLA 0YT,1, /Vt't'# rb J.,/ P ~,
p~o IE t: r 0 vfl ~ I TV OI?IJ/A/'A.MCG ~_~_C__
-
Plio III/1TS E-){ t c- SS I t/ t= I?e.-'T /~C'!?(~~~_~
-
-.J1I.G PI( c IJ I LT .,. HA r .-LE~~ O.e.__! ~l_ ___/5. _
t9PPf(oJ/.~o ~ClV COuLO l?eCt:/J/1' 5"~,-fc?
- ,
I]~r /#CR~ tJ.-gs (;IF.2 S ~t:I vPTO /~~~
/ ~ ~hF rl,JTvlt 6. / r IJ tiP n Yo v ___-
Elt-II T l?A eX - WCJtl? A" /2) (;RFE' /'!-7.~
~-<lOP /'1'7 O/i( ,J(tlV WILL p~~~
-rife 5'fJ/lCE l?E.,vT /,u C I?E/f S G'.
"
LIe c;'~
~
-
MOBILEHOME PARKS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
NAME/LOCA TION
5 & 10 Mobile Ranch - 1500 Third Avenue
Bayscene Mobilehome Park - 100 Woodlawn Ave.
Bayside Trailer Park - 1424 Broadway
Bison Mobilehome Park - 708 "H" Street
Brentwood Mobilehome Park - 1100 Industriai Avenue
Broadway Trailer Park - 350 Broadway
Cabrillo Mobile Lodge - 731 "G" Street
Caravan Mobilehome Park - 246 Broadway
Chula Vista Mobilehome Park - 345 "CO Street
Continental Country Club - 445 Orange Avenue
Don Luis Mobile Estates - 121 Orange Avenue
EI Mirador Trailer Court - 577 Palomar Street
Farm House Trailer Park - 523 Anita Street
Flamingo Trailer Park - 466 Broadway
Fogerty Brothers Trailer Park - 184 Broadway
Georgeana Mobilehome Park - 1225 Frontage Road
Granada Mobile Estates - 501 Anita Street
Hacienda Mobile Estates - 502 Anita Street
Jade Bay Mobilehome Park - 701 "D" Street
Lynwood South Mobilehome Park - 444 Anita Street
Mohawk Trailer Park - 330 Broadway
Mountain View Mobile Lodge - 1148 Third Avenue
Otay Lakes Lodge - 1925 Otay Lakes Road
Palace Garden Mobilehome Park - 1425 Second Ave.
Palms Mobile Estates - 275 Orange Avenue
Rancho Bonita Mobilehome Park - 600 Anita Street
Rose Arbor - 352 Broadway
Sharon's Mobilehome Park - 681 "I" Street
Terry's Enterprises - 677 "G" Street
Thunderbird Mobilehome Park - 368 Anita Street
Trailer Villa - 288 Broadway
Twin Palms Trailer Park - 1689 Broadway (closing)
9>ACI!B
101
126
30
77
253
74
125
52
166
76
129
33
27
61
48
44
198
100
76
120
26
129
196
294
217
90
133
63
197
110
117
48
3 t r ()
3,536 TOTAL SPACES
32 PARKS
RESIDENT-OWNED PARKS
Orange Tree MHP/condominium - 521 Orange Avenue
19 rental (154 total)
RV PARKS
Cavalier Motel
Chula Vista R.V. Park - 460 Sandpiper Way
San Diego KOA - 3601 Edgemere Avenue
17
237
123
ltD'7
I_.'s ~ 1
Agenda Item
Meeting Date
If
1/16/96
COUNCIL INFORMATION
DATE:
January 11, 1996
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and city Council
---- I -- ",
/,', .'j' I~'
John D. Goss, City Manager .) I ,..(1. ,
Robert W. Powell, Director of Finance~~t
John Lippitt, Director of Public works~;jI)---
EVALUATION PROCESS FOR PRINTING AND MAILING SERVICES
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
During Council consideration on January 9, 1996 of the item
recommending awarding a contract for printing and mailing services
to Eye/Comm Inc., Mr. Manual Alvillar of Matmail distributed a
detailed computation of their proposal and asserted that it
represented the lowest cost proposal. Council asked that staff
review these materials and submit further analysis to Council.
It is important to note that total cost was only one of several
criteria considered by staff in arriving at a recommendation for
this service contract. The other criteria all focused on the
proposer's ability to provide a consistent high level of service,
and included such considerations as number and experience level of
employees, experience in providing like services to other entities,
and quality of references from other entities for which they have
provided like services.
Proposal Cost Evaluation
We have reviewed the materials supplied by Matmail and compared
them with the cost evaluation done by the selection committee.
Based on this evaluation, staff still concludes that Eye/Comm's is
the lowest cost proposal.
In order to ensure an accurate and fair comparison of costs, staff
utilized the per unit costs from each proposer and applied those to
specific actual volumes and services levels. The volumes and
service levels used in staff's evaluation were very specific actual
mail volumes that included a wide variety of classes and weights of
items. The resultant costs for each function, i.e. sewer billing,
business license renewal, daily mail, etc., were then summarized
for each proposal for comparison purposes.
14../--/
CITY MAILING PROCESS
- 2 -
January 11, 1996
The RFP mailed to potential proposers included ranges of volumes of
daily mail so proposers would know the relative size of the City
account. This information did not contain detailed information
about specific volumes for all classes and weights of items. In
Matmail's evaluation that was submitted to Council on January 9,
they used averages of these simplified figures. While these
figures are useful during proposal preparation, they are different
from the figures used for proposal evaluation and therefore the
results cannot be compared to the other proposals. If the volumes
utilized by Matmail in their latest calculations were also applied
to the other proposals unit prices, the estimated cost of the other
proposals would also drop, leaving all proposals in the same
relative position.
While it is true that postage costs should be essentially the same
for the various vendors, there is one area where it isn't. For the
daily mail category that is termed "flats" (we commonly know it as
the large manila envelopes), the vendor recommended by staff is
able to achieve postage savings because of their automated process
and the large volume of mail they process each day. They are able
to achieve this large volume since they process mail for many large
companies including SDG&E, Pacific Bell, Rohr and the Union
Tribune. with Matmail there has been no postage savings for this
class of service and the City is additionally charged a handling
fee. Matmail's proposal for flats was their "standard rates."
Since we are currently paying their standard rates, this is the
rate we used when evaluating their proposal. Because of the large
amount of this type of mail that the city produces, this was a
significant factor in making Matmail's proposal higher than the
competitors. The attached chart contains detail of staff's
proposal evaluation of each of the vendors.
Quality of Service
Eye/Comm, Inc., the proposer sUbmitting the lowest cost proposal,
was also rated by the selection committee as the proposer most
likely to provide the highest level of service to the city. Their
top level managers have a combined total of 60 years in printing
and direct mail experience and all references reported excellent
service. Eye/Comm is proposing to subcontract the daily mail
processing to zipsort, Inc., the largest mailing contractor in the
region, who also received excellent references.
Matmail was rated last by the selection committee as the proposer
least likely to provide a high level of service to the city. This
rating was based on their lack of successful long-term experience
in the data management and printing functions, as well as
relatively poor references on their mail processing. Since Matmail
has been handling the City's outgoing mail since February, 1994, we
also are well aware of their capabilities in mail processing.
While the City has saved money on postage during this period, we
Iq.,/,&-
CITY MAILING PROCESS
- 3 -
January II, 1996
have also experienced an unacceptable level of problems with mail
delivery, directly attributable to Matmail. The major complaint
from departments and the public has been the untimely receipt of
time sensitive mail, such as public hearing notices. Although per
agreement, mail is to be postmarked and delivered to the post
office the same day as picked up by Matmail, this has all too often
not been the case. Time after time, mail is postmarked anywhere
from one to five days late. Although several meetings have taken
place with Matmail to inform them of these problems, little
improvement has been noticed. with this less than impressive track
record in processing the City's mail, which is the function with
which this company has the most experience, the committee felt very
reticent to rate highly their ability in the relatively new
functions of data management and printing.
m: \dat.a\mC'mos\director\mailS .cc
(if, 1,3
SEWER BILLING
One-time set-up
supplies , services
Estimated Postage
Total Sewer Billing
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
services
Estimated Postage
Total Business Licenses
CHULA VISTA OUARTERLY
Services
Estimated Postage
Total Quarterly
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MTGS
POSTCARDS
Supplies , Services
Estimated postage
Total Postcards
LETTERS
supplies , Services
Estimated Postage
Total Letters
Total Open Space
DAILY MAIL
First Clas up to 2 oz.
Flats (firt class bulk)
Other Classes , Misc.
Total Daily Mail
TOTAL ANNUAL PROPOSAL
(assumes same postage
rate except daily mail)
PRINTING , MAILING PROPOSAL
COST EVALUATION SUMMARY
EYE/COMM
MATMAIL
150
23,191
23.927
o
19,028
23.927
$47,268
$42,955
504
3.151
483
3.151
$3,655
$3,634
2,544
$15.600
9,000
$15.600
$18,144
$24,600
412
1.790
$2,202
250
1. 790
$2,040
836
2.580
1,620
2.580
$3,416
$4,200
$5,618
$6,240
83,652
27,381
4.590
81,829
37,697
2.598
$115,623
$122,124
$190,308 $199,553
ItJ- I-Y IV-I-7
WESTERN GRAPHICS
250
30,133
23.927
$54,310
572
3.151
$3,723
2,849
$15.600
$18,449
1,366
1.790
$3,156
1,232
2.580
$3,812
$6,968
83,652
27,381
4.590
$115,623
$199,073
January 11, 1996
TO: The Honorable Mayor and city Council
FROM: John D. Goss, City ManageI(;'-:</ IF\~~1!:~~1
SUBJECT: Item #14 on the 1/16/96 Council Agenda Regarding City
Mail Services
Please find attached a memo from city support staff in favor of the
agreement with Eye/Com, Inc. for City mail services and displaying
dissatisfaction in the level of service provided by MatMail, Inc.
)~~/-~
MEMORANDUM
January 10, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Support Staff
SUBJECT: City Mail Services
We the undersigned would like to encourage Council to approve the agreement with Eye/Comm, Inc.
for City mail services. During the time the MatMail, Inc. has processed the City's mail, staff
members, such as ourselves, have been embarrassed by the poor service provided by MatMail, Inc.
Numerous time we have had to deal with upset public regarding notices being received late for
. Commission and Council meetings. The City is receiving a negative image from the public as a
result. As staff members, we do not feel we should have to endure the anger from the public
generated by MatMail's poor service.
Name
Title
Department
, . (
t. \', J....-c\ (^_ c.
)(. _A ;;
i \( _: 1~' CS}
(,
(.J, -\y/\ -'
'I /j
. 1,.' c"'-\
> I~' ~L.\. ,J-~f. l't,"1'--
..' / \
,
. J,
\,'r\,-~-\ /l~c:_
,.."'j
(OJ-it))~, )/'j " (~-
,
,
10
t.\ I' ~ ,
I
1\, " 1 -.1 (' ~
,J I
,
:.~ ,'- ,',
('{ M',.
i
-J
ill
.J "
1)( {}- ..
,-- -, I;
,
----', ,\
" ,I" A'
'< //
..
':cc
//,- 1\
.,:/1.'. j it )~(\
,
j
) ,.C' ,
t/ ,_I t:i?>/L/IC.>7//C/'
, )
1/)/../
~:_~:i-~._.-..:..-
f ,': l) / l J ;" ' (."'-~-'/'-i<Z
/,,'/) @
~}-r"- ,,1J--~.yy~J,
/H....<.L,"- Y ')A .or..,... ... ... ~ ./vij.-
("'77/'>r;.y< 0-a/n<:vLL.J..
,_~X ~ / __ __ _, ~ __ __ ~/ ~~/,
/ If1j"Cul U u,~<..u:{ >:--- ..
l_--t 'I:...:'" ~C,;-t,--' -(
/ /
-- --:.-( ,~
/ I
i.t C
"
'111
,t"'f
..
v
'd.
(
I '. ."j' .
',--.H. l?/Ai)tZ.W
~;t'f{j:'- "~I' a
~ I
::..:,..l~.k-:.a:..'r-z.-'r~'z :;;
f'~c'~~
)
11.'/ :-).t}L 1,.ll
~c~i0.v
/.., '(] )."
,
1'1' ,t
C0J~
"\. ,
+1,.\ 1\ '.. \ <"
CVCJ cWc>"";1
"'-,
( ('
, ,
if
-:k'
,~ /
\, cn/''--'t:..(.I............
11.f"/~Co
MEMORANDUM
January 10, 1996
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: City Support Staff
SUBJECT: City Mail Services
We the undersigned would like to encourage Council to approve the agreement with Eye/Comm, Inc.
for City mail services. During the time the MatMail, Inc. has processed the City's mail, staff
members, such as ourselves, have been embarrassed by the poor service provided by MatMail, Inc.
Numerous time we have had to deal with upset public regarding notices being received late for
Commission and Council meetings. The City is receiving a negative image from the public as a
result. As staff members, we do not feel we should have to endure the anger from the public
generated by MatMaiJ's poor service.
Name
Title
Department
L L' /l,!)
if,) ii
(IJ......U-,^,.
!
" 'r .1. //,
,( L !<Lt '
I" "^
.'dlU'
/{)Jh
,'1 '
,
if,!l)
/ j' /
,'/1,,'
{.J.;i;1 ii,
-! ,Vi
(\' i
',Ii, ,<
j.4) Ln~/
/1
/,
{t.~! bJ, i\.~ (.(
,
"
/',,(',
~ P.I. 4' N",;,
'I )
..1 /
/;' I., I } , (
,d,
" -\...ICrl...{
,',U
e,
'-::..:1.,
,.,I /
,
~Q0l
\lJ.,~^ .)
'::l a..c fctt, ( t
VU5Dfl/J' J
j :('14 ;./, U/.J;
.' L. b...c.lciLA.,- L.
:'.-'-
/j _'./Fi
/c(/;.,.f.-./
[":eey -"..,( i
. I. ../.
Il".(.j fe, (/ /VJ
-->" - / '--- -41 "
,
Ilr/m //7.
11-1 -7
?(~S~ CFF=i~E ROX l::S~
IF PAYING BY MASTERCARD OR VISA, FILL OUT-BELOW
~'HECK-(:ARti CS-fNO'-F'CR"PA;il-fENT"
C, MAS'I'i:RCARD ::!:
VISA
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO,
SO BAY RADIOLOGY MED ASSOC,INC
,:HULl'l. 'JISTA ~~A 9:9~)-14'~;1:-J
i~l9-S8S -297C'
-~~. ,,'.;;"
1.:-":'-'1
;.,\
"\A:T
STATEMENT DATE
PAY THIS AMOUNT
~ AC"CT. 1I
SHOW AMOUNT $
PAID HERE
:l: ':~'S/9h
$
22-23-455143CU
SO BAY RADIOLOGY MED ASSOC,INC
Natic;!":al City, C.A 919S0.-G76J..
POST OFFICE BOX 121510
C[-f:JlA VISTA CA 91912-1456
11,1"",111,1",1.1,11""11"1,.,1,11.",,1111,,,,,1,1,1,,11
22-2]-455143\)3
Sepa-,="ate Here - Ret.:,lrn Top"P:)rtic,n-~n':_-th Pa-yment
PATIENT NAME:
10 2 0 95,
10/20/95
10/20/95
11/20/95
11/20/95
76096
19290
99070
999951
888851
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
BREAST NODULE LOCALIZATION
PREOP PLCMNT NEEDLE LOCAL W
TRAY-NEEDLE LOCALIZATION
HMO/PPO-PAYMENT
HMO/PPO PROVIDER ADJUSTMENT
AMOUNT
DATE
POS' DIAGNOSIS
I
r---'
,
I
I
I
11 611.72
11 611.72
11 611.72
169.00
177.00
40.00
243.18-
115.80-
EMPLOYER PRIMARY POLICY SEC. POLICY INJURY DATE ADMISSION DATE DISCHARGE DATE BALANCE DUEl
:;;:RIPPS HOSP CV 552346842 $ 27.02 i
I
I
ATTENDING DOCTOR:
REFERRING DOCTOR:
TAX 1D NUMBER: 33-0262689
PATIENT NAME:
LOCATION OF SERVICE
SO 3AY RADIOLOGY MED ASSOC
POST OFFICE BOX 1456
CHU~A VISTA CA 91912
ACCOUNT NUMBER: :2 2 - 23 -45514303
STATEMENT
)'-1// ..' f
~JI
~~
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO,
IF PAYING BY MASTERCARD OR VIS;" FILL OUT BELOW
-'HE','f( ,_'ARD USING oOR E'A'iNEN':'
c., MASTIi:RCARD :::E'
VISA
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
p~s~ ()F?IrE BOX ~45F
\." ',,'
';.i;,. ;..\ V'::S'="A ;-~A 919:2 :;-4';6
'~L:! :; ,S [S 2~J ') J
"N
., - ~:7:'\-'-:;-;-
DJ / :lS /)6
PAY THIS AMOUNT
$ 1.1.95
ACCT. #
SHOW AMOUNT $
PAID HERE
STATEMENT DATE
1 U.2-]l275J89
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
)J:-~ ~_ .'q() , -_~A 92113 -1237
POST OF?ICE BOX 1456
CHULA VISTA CA 91912-~456
11,1""1,1",11",11"11,,,,11,,1,1,,11,1,,,11,,1,,1,,11,1,,1
~-n::::-3l275389
S':::'parate He.:::-e - Re:urn Top Pnr:ion W-it.n Payment
PATIENT NAME,
Patient Name:
Account No.:
.02-31275339
Notice Date:
Balance Due: $
01/05/96
14.95
THIS IS YOUR FINAL NOTICE!
Our records indicate that the above account will be sent to a collection agency if
we do not receive immediate payment. This may adversely effect your ability to
obtain credit.
We urge you to conclude this matter by paying the account in full within seven (7)
days. Your action now will certainly eliminate future collection activity.
FINAL NOTICE
~KE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
FOS'T OFFICE BOX 1456
C.f-L'LA VISTA CA 91912-1436
, /
/ '.'./
/
I
our thanks.
v~
0~Y\V
r,= payment has been forwarded or arrangements made,
please disregard t}lis notic..: wi tn
MAKE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
IF PAYING BY MASTERCARD OR VISA, FILL OUT BELOW
POST OFFICE BOX 1456
:;-1:_ :J\ '-lISTA ('A 91912 :'4~;6
~'HE~'Y CARD ;;SING fOR i'AIMENT
.~.. "'=""
. f MASTIi:RCARD ~ VISA
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
',"
'_)19-~::;"35 2970
~- .~
STATEMENT DATE
PAY THIS AMOUNT
ACCT. #
SHOW AMOUNT $
PAID HERE
:]1 5/~16
$ 4S. '~I()
CI-Ol-113;.:iS2:J
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
-':-: _;~a Visca, CA 9~9:1-34C'6
?OS~ OFFICE BOX :436
ChULA 'IIISTA CA 9l9l2-1456
11,1,.".111.1"",11",11"11.,1"111,,,,11,.,,1,1.,11,,,,III
C)1-C':-ll3:::::2:.3
PATIENT NAME:
Patient Name:
Notice Date: D1/05/96
Balance Due: $ 45.00
Account No.: 01-01-1:355223
Your account has a balance due that is delinquent.
To avoid further action, remit payment at once. Indicate your
choice of payment below and return this letter with your payment in
the enclosed envelope. Please write your account number on your
check
----- Payment in full is enclosed
---I will make monthly payments of $
until the account
is paid in full.
Remi.'1der: You are responsible for pa}7T1en t regardless of insurance coverage.
If there is a reason why this account has not been paid, please call
our patient representative to discuss this situation
Failure to send your payment or notify us of your intentions will
force us to consider turning your account over to collections
~KE CHECKS PAYABLE TO:
SO BAY RADIOLOGY INC-PC
PUST OFFICE BOX 1456
CHULA VISTA CA 91912--1456
rt Dd}'Tne.'1t has been forwarded 01-~ arrangements made, please disregard this notice wi th our
.' / /
thanks.
",f?
0f\0Q
M
A
! I
L
i R
3 Sin Ie List
Coding Accuracy Support System (CASS) Report
s
CASS Certificate Information
A1. CASS CERTIFIED COMPANY NAME
C \.l;.-Sott\\are CGlllpany
A Software Name and Version
S rvly!\'1ailrvlanagL'r. Vcrsi{lIl I
S Configuration
Vt:ndor supplied soth\are \\.ith vendor ('ASS-Certified softv.are contigurations.
o
F
T
w
A
i<
E
L
81. LIST PROCESSOR'S NAME 82. DATE LIST PROCESSED 83. DATE OF ZIP+4 DATA8ASE USED
iVI,\TMAIL 1'l/1996 Nov/l 'l95
84. ADDRESS LIST NAME 85. NUM8ER OF LISTS 86. TOTAL ADDRESS RECORDS
O'iE.MML ONE 659
S
T
o
U
T
P
U
T
CASS OUTPUT RATING TOT AL CODED PERCENT OF TOTAL ADDRESS RECORDS
(Percent of total appearing in block. 86 abo'-€)
C1. Records ZIP+4 Coded 619 93 %
C2. Records 5-Digit Coded 619 'l3 %
C3. Records CR RT Coded 61'l 'l3 %
E
D1. SIGNATURE OF MAILER D2. NAME & ADDRESS OF MAILER
MATMAIL
7220 ALAMITOS AVE SUITE C
..- - SAN DIEGO CA 92]54-4710
I Certify that the mailing submitted with this form has been ZIP+4 Cod.e.d (as D3. DATE SIGNED
Indicated above) uSing CASS certified software meeting all requirements of
Domestic Mall Manual A0950
.~s Form 3553
Mailer: Please fill out all of the following information in the form above:
B 1: Enter the name of the person who ran Address Checker
D1. Sign the form.
D3: Enter the date you signed the form.
You must retain a copy of this form for one year from the date of mailing.
i.j /
/ /
. .
i
r\PV
S~
Statement of Mailing with Permit Imprints
First-Class Mail (For Priority Mail use Form 3605-R)
\1.\" ~? Corrplele JII :terns oy typewnter pen ar ,ndelible nencll Use Form 3606 If VQU need a recell'll.
- - --!-::O~st .__:.tf'ce ,)I Mailing Date Processll"'g Category USPS Authorized Mailing iD Code(s)
S_\'..[)!! (;()l'\,)]'l 19,-)()
~~r<"':llt ~Jo l'Oederal Agency COSI Code Mailing Statement Seq "0 !Xl Letters (OMM COSO)
!II'/<) IU9t) I J Flats (OMM COSO)
-. [ J Automation-Compatible Flats
, , ';'~rn1Il.-4older5 'hlme Telephone Number Receipt No (DMM C820)
, 3,-\ddress [ 1 Irregular Parcels (OMM C050)
"l::::LIlJe.?IF' '__,X:81 1(1 I <lH::Il)-'-l--l-1
\1.\ 1\1 \IL No Sacks r: Trays No. Pallets No. Other
I -'2~f) "I .\\IIIOS ,WI SUITE C Weightofa
! Single Piece OOIJ4
S.\c. DIHi()( ./\ 9215'+--1.710 nounds
Total Pieces ;n Mailirg Total Weight of Marling
-'::TAS:usl Ref ,0 ---.. --.---
, 65X 2.X79
~ I "omo & "de", of ,,,,"de" oc 0'900""'00 foc Name and Address of Mailing Agent Check All That Apply (USPS Only)
, i'ihlcn \,flailing ~s Prepared (If other than the permit holder)
. : 'f oH:er than ~'"'e permit ...older
I ] Centralized Postage Payment
! ] Plant Loaded to
[ I BMAU Entry at
[ ] Orig I ) Dest. AJOZip
[ ] Orig [ ] Dest SCF 3D ZIP
[ ]Orig [ ] Dest. ADC
" For mailings of automation-compatible letter size pieces (see OMM C810), other than
, cards. go to Part A on the reverse side of this form
For mailings of non-automation compatible letter-size pieces (see OMM C050), other than ~ Part A $
cards weighing 6875 pound (11 ounces) or less, go to Part B on the reverse of this } ~
fOrtli ~ Part B $
& a:
For mailings of non !elter-size pieces (OMM C050) other than cards, or of automation- j
compatible flats (see DMM COSO) weighing 68751b_ (11 ounces) or less, go to Part C on the Part C $
~'c>verse of this form
i For mailings of postal cards and postcards (DMM E100), go to Part 0 on the reverse of [ IIl.39
this form. Part D $ I
I [ ! Additional Postage Payment [ ] Special Se['.J1ce (Specify) No Pieces Rate/Piece ,
jState ceascns~ $ ~ $
i
, Total Postage -+ $
i 111139
---- ~._-
I
I
I
The signature of a mailer or its agent certifies that it will be liable for and agrees to pay, subject to appeals prescribed by postal laws and
regulations, any revenue deficiencies assessed on this mailing_ If this form is signed by an agent, the agent certifies that it is authorized to sign
this statement, that the certification binds the agent and the mailer and both the mailer and the agent will be liable for and agree to pay any
deficiencies
The submission of a false fictitious or fraudulent statement may result in imprisonment of up to 5 years and a fine of up to $10,000 (18 use 1001). In addition.
a civil penalty of up to $5.000 and an additional assessment of twice the amount falsely claimed may be imposed (31 USC 3802)
r hereby certify that all information furnished on this form is accurate and truthful, that this mailing meets all applicable CASS
IMASS standards for address and barcode accuracy, and that the material presented qualifies for the rates of postage claimed
I Signature oi Permit Holder or Agent (Both principal and agent are liable for any postage deficiency Incurred) Telephone Number
~-~~ Are the fioures at left adjusted from mailers entries?
i Single Piece [ ] Yes [ ! No
Nelght
I pounds If"Yes"reason
s i fatal P'eces I Total Weight
0
'~ j
I Tetal P'lstage
. i Cheo' ,);;0'"
,
, Date Mailer Notified Contact By (IMials) .
Presort Verification Per-
J !~ i Ver:l Not Scheduled . 1 formed as Scheduled
Round Stamp (Required)
! :2ERTIFY that this mailing has been inspected concerning 1) eligibility for the rate of postage claimed: 2) proper preparation
I 'and pr-esort where required) 3) proper completion of the statement of mailing; and 4) payment of the required annual fee
Signature of Weigher Time AM
i PM
-CC; r r'll 3600-R January ~995
.j
/ /../
Financial Document - Forward to Finance Office 11
S#~'v
Form 3600-R - First-Class Other than Priority Mail
Permit Imprint
?a
os age ompu a Ion
.------~---
P'~sort PresortJ
':"Ulomatll)n Net Ccunt Automation Net Count
----.--"-- --- 815colln~5 Rate iPesl Chaq.j€ Discounts Rate 'PeSI Charne
1rt I~' Automation-Compatible Letter (DMM C810) Part B: Non-Automation Compatible Letter 6875 Ib 111 OZ,) or Less
C:'~p + .:l Barcoded Carrier Route , p" 0 $
:5-u;{:Jil" , p" 0 $
PresOl1ed First-Class , p" 0 S
:::IP + -1- 8arcoded
J-'-:-'9,1) , p" 0 $ Single-Piece Rate , '" 0 ,
::>::P ~ .1 P~esort , p" 0 , Nonstandard Surcharge
(If Applicable)
DP ~1 Presol1ed and Carrier
'!\,o"presortedl , p" 0 $ Route 05 , p" 0 $
Single-Piece Rate 11 , p" 0 S
'~3rne' ~oule , p" 0 $
?r€SO'led First-Class , p" 0 $
3jngle-Piece Rate , p" = $ I
I
n: ~ art A ; Carry to front of form I $ Total - Part B . (Carry to front of form) $
rtC: Check One: [ J Automation-Compatible Flats (DMM COS05) Part D: Postal Cards and Post Cards
[ ] Other Nonletter -6875 Ib (11 oz.) or Less
ZIP + 4 Barcoded
LIP +4 Barcoded (5-Digit) 163x .9. p" 0 s 80 52
,3/5 Digit) , p" 0 ,
ZIP + 4 Barcoded
ZIP +4 Barcoded (3-Digit) 170 x 57 p" = $ 9.69
NonpresortedJ , p" 0 $ I
ZIP + 4 Barcoded
Carrier Route , p" 0 $ (Nonpresorted) 186 x 68 p" = $ 12.65 I
Presorted First-Class , p" 0 ,
ZIP + 4 Presort 173x 0 p" = $ 0.00
Single-Piece Rate , p" = $
ZIP + 4
(Nonpresorted) 189 x 0 p" = $ 0.00
I~onstandard Surcharge
{If Applicable) Carrier Route 160 x pc, = $
Ji5Digl! Zip+4 Barcoded
Presorted First Class Presorted First-Class 179 x 13 pc, = S '"
_._\_1
and Carrier Route 05 , pc, 0 $
Single-Piece Rate 200 x 26 p" = $ 5.20
3Ingle-?lece Rate 11 , pes = $
Nonstandard Surcharge I
(If Applicable)
Presorted Firsl C:ass 1
and Carrier Route 05 , pc, = $ 1
,
Single-Piece Rate 11 , p" 0 S
'l,iCJD:e onl, 'or !>,ulomation-Compatible Flats (DMM C820) "A,vallable only for Automation-Compatible Flats (DMM C820)
-~
-"I Part C ':Carrj '0 front ofform) $ rotal - Part 0 ICarry to front of form) $ 110.39
p
t
c
t f
'-:1
-'j ;::'.xm 3600.R January 1995 (Reversel
/
~/
Jj
3/5 PRESORT TIER
~ , -' u.c..:
~~< 1 J
j ~ ;; 3:2
:::I ~-) ,:, C
J ..
:"';3
1 ~::___ .-_ 4
92-:'3c;.
'~; 2 1 SL~
0:21'/3
TOTALS
S -:J i gi t
Ra !:-,:oded Rate
Ba::::"coded
1S
lC7
114
44
29
16
()
1 R
1"1
13
71
:;:
494
:::H\1M ~Jl-81~ rres:.Jr:-
F i ~:st Cl<JSS
j -0 ~g i:::
Bd!::'codcd :<d~.e
DP Barcodecl
o
c
"
o
57
"
o
.')
'0
c
57
RESIDUAL/BASIC PRESORT TIER
ZI?
Ccde
o l~;
:JSD
2"!
438
(,
');3
,g':',;;?
H :;,'~
8 C,('
91)':)
9(; l
9::'
S<)7
9 ~ J
9:2
?:::!
;j2.:;
.1,-; .:
941
~).~ :::
9l~ 1
97
9S
1 N,' ZIP Code}
TOTALS
Nonpresorted
ZIP+4 Rate
\DP Barcoded)
:
1
o
1
1
2
"
u
4
o
35
2
(]
1
:
2
c
4
c
r; 2
:;~IP+4 Preso.:::t
c
Rate ~ate
Not DP Barceded) i:'-Jo-:. DP Barcoded)
esort Flrs:-Clas
J
Cj
c~
J
o
o
c'
,
u
'0
o
Ncnpresort'O"d
Z:::2+4 Rate
(Not DP Barcoded)
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
o
o
J
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
c
o
13
o
o
o
o
o
13
Single P.::.ece
Fir-st-Class :2ate
(Not OF Barcoded)
o
o
o
2
o
o
c
o
U
1
o
o
1
o
o
1
0 1
0 9
r) 0
C 2
C 0
0 0
.J 0
0 1
C 0
0 0
g
C 2G
_/ / / L/
C'..l!T\u-:"aci'Je
T:=Jta::'
15
122
2';::;
2EO
309
325
39S
413
424
442
513
564
564
Cumulative
"J:"o~al
2
3
4
6
7
8
9
::..0
13
14
15
16
19
23
25
26
70
72
74
75
76
73
79
32
86
94
94
SUMMARY
~~ -~iyit Barcoded ~ate
I_ 31 3-D~git Barcoded Ra~e
~l Z~P ~ 4 Freso~c Rate
l' '_dl Fresort First -Class Race
T ;tal Nonpresorted Barcoded ~ate
--al Ncnpresorted ZIP ~ 4 Rate
'>l.~ .sing~e Piece Rate Pieces
T=,~A=- P'JSTAG2 CUE FOR MAILING
'f':'4
57
13
68
c
16
Postage
er piece
,~, . ~ 6 3
C.170
,", . :. 73
o. '- 79
C.186
0.189
.2 ()C
--ral pieces With a Delivery Point Barcode: 619
1,~ta] Fieces Without a Delivery Point Barcode39
T~tal Pieces in the Mailing: 658
F~r~entage of Ba~coded ?ieces: 94.07%
/-1
/
/
/j
P:h,j'= .2
Postage
Charges
80.522
9.690
O.OOu
4. . 327
12.648
0.000
:i. 7. OC
$ll0.39
PRINTING & MAILING PROPOSAL
COST EV ALUATION SUMMARY
EYE/COMM
MATMAIL
WESTERN GRAPHICS
SEWER BILLING
Total Sewer Billing
150 0 250
23,191 19,028 30,133
23,927 23,927 23,927
$47,268 $42,955 $54,3 10
One-time set-up
Supplies & Services
Estimated Postage
BUSINESS LICENSE RENEWAL
Services
Estimated Postage
504
3.151
483
3.151
572
,hill
Total Business Licensees
$3,655
$3,634
$3,723
CHULA VISTA OUARTERL Y
Services
Estimated Postage
2,544
$15,600
9,000
$15,600
3,600
14,040
2,849
$15,600
Total Quarterly
$ 18,144
$24,600
17,640
$18,449
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT MTGS
POSTCARDS
Supplies & Services
Estimated Postage
412
J,790
250
1,790
250
1,170
1,366
1,790
Total Postcards
$2,202
$2,040
/,420
$3,156
LETTERS
Supplies & Services
Estimaled Postage
836
2,580
1,620
2,580
/,/70
1,232
2,580
Tota] Letters
$3,416
$4,200
$6,240
2,790
$3,812
Total Open Space
$5,618
$6,968
DAILY MAIL
First Class up to:2 oz.
Flats (first class)
Other Classes & Misc.
83,652 81,829 83,652
27.381 37.697 27,381
4,590 2,598 4,590
$115,623 $122,124 $/15,623
$190,308 $199,553 /90,563 $199,073
Tolal Daily Mail
TOTAL ANNUAL PROPOSAL
(assumes same postage rate
except daily mail)
,;/ - /-
/
I'~. '
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item
Meeting Date 1/16/96
Resolution Iffl Y~ppropriating $3, I 00 from the unappropriated balance
of the General Fund for thc installation of an All-Way Stop and Pedestrian
Ramps at the intersection of Terra Nova Drive/ Beacon Place/Westview
Drive
/
j..!;
SVBMITTED BY:
Director of Public Works .(
\
I_ Iv I
City Manager "'y"' .1 tJ
I'
.
(4/Sths Vote: YesX-No_)
REVIEWED BY:
Thc Traffic Engineer has received a petition with 56 signatures requesting an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive at either the intersection of Hidden Vista Drive or
Bcacon Place/Westview Drive. The Safety Commission and City staff made opposing recommend-
ations as to whether or not an all-way stop should be installed. Therefore, under the Council Policy
delegating authority for tramc related items, this report is to be heard by the CounciL
RECOMMENDATION: That Council not approve the resolution which would appropriate $3,100
from the General Fund for an all-way stop at the intersection and pedestrian ramps of Terra Nova
Drive and Beacon Place/Westview Drive.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On October 12, 1995, the Safety
Commission voted 7-0 to oppose staffs recommendation and to install an all-way stop at Terra Nova
Drive and Beacon Place/Westview Drivc as a Trial Traffic Regulation and a report back to the
Commission in three to fourth months after thc installation of the stop signs which addressed speed
concerns.
DISCUSSION:
Area residents have raised concerns about the lack of visibility and speed of Terra Nova Drive traffic
which makes it difficult for pedestrians to cross the street. This concern became apparent to the
residents when the access to Rancho del Rey Parkway was opened on June I, 1995 and tramc
volumes increased. The area residents sent in to the City a petition with 56 signatures requesting
an all-way stop and crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive at either the intersection of Hidden
Vista Drive or Beacon Place/Westview Drivc. According to the petition, the request was made to
facilitate Beacon Place and Dawn Court pedestrians crossing Terra Nova Drive from/to Clear View
Elementary School and Terra Nova Park. Attached as Exhibit A is a plat showing the existing
striping pattern, which contains a map showing the location of the subject area.
At each intersection, staff conducted two all-way stop studies; one before and one after Terra Nova
Dnve to the north was opened to the public on June 1, 1995. These studies allowed staff to evaluate
the effect of higher volume on the major street on a portion of a roadway which previously
terminated several hundred feet to the north of the intersection of Beacon Place. When considering
an intersection for an all-way stop control, several factors are investigated to determine the need for
/f.; /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 1/16/96
,/
installation. Pedestrians and vehicle volumes, accident history and physical factors such as sight
distances, speed of approaching vehicles, and curves are all taken into consideration.
Beacon PlacelWestview Drive and Terra Nova Drive
The intersection of Terra Nova Drive and Beacon Placc/Westview Drive is a four-legged intersection
with existing stop signs on Beacon Place and on Westview Drive. In this area, Terra Nova Drive
is a two lane, 58' wide collector street with bike lanes on both sides and a left turn lane. Terra Nova
Drive now has an average daily traffic (ADT) of 1,694. In May, 1995, the striping on Terra Nova
Drive was modified to increase sight distance on Beacon Place. Thus, northbound vehicles
approaching Beacon Place have been moved away from the east curbline by 15'. Beacon Place and
Westview Drive are both 36' wide residential streets with approximately 600 ADT on each street.
To the south approximately 250' is the T-intersection of Hidden Vista Drive.
An all-way stop warrant evaluation was conducted and this evaluation, which assessed points to
various traffic factors, revealed that the intersection at Beacon Place received a total of 19 and 13
points, respectively before and after Terra Nova Drive was extended from Beacon Place to Rancho
del Rey Parkway. Under the existing all-way stop policy, the maximum points possible is 54, where
30 points satisfy the minimum warrants needed to justify the installation of an all-way stop. The six
point reduction in the after opening study is due to the traffic volume difference between the streets
now that Terra Nova Drive traffic volumes north of Beacon Place increased from 400 ADT to 1694
ADT. All-way stops are installed to help assign the right-of-way, therefore, all-way stops operate
best when volumes on each approach are more nearly equal.
Pedestrian studies were completed and the number of pedestrians crossing the street was less than
50. There is a need for pedestrians to cross at this location if fhey live on Beacon Place or on Dawn
Court because there are no sidewalks along the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive between Beacon
Place and Hidden Vista Drive nor pedestrian ramps at the intersection with Beacon Place. Clear
View Elcmentary School and Terra Nova Park arc located to the west via Hidden Vista Drive and
Slnce thesc students live too close to the school arc not bussed but actually driven to school by
parents. At the Safety Commission meeting, area residents stated that due to their concerns about
walking across Terra Nova Drive, they prefer to drive their children to the school. The costs
involved to install stop signs on Terra Nova Drive and to install the crosswalk with pedestrian ramps
at Beacon Place is estimated at $3.100.
Although the sight distance is somewhat limited by shrubs along the east curbline and the cnrvature
of the roadway, the clear sight distance is now approximately 300', In May of this year the striping
was modified to its present alignment to providc this increased sight distance, The speed limit is
posted at 35 mph with a radar gun recorded 85th% spced of39 mph which was obtained during the
non-peak traffic volume. Using the traffic counters, staff compiled a continous 72 hour study period
WIth the following results:
If'-L
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date l/16/96
,/
D
Terra Nova Drive in the Vicinity of Hidden Vista Northbound Southbound
Drive and Beacon Place MPH MPH
A verage Speed 35.28 40.60
Median Speed ('12 above & 'h below) 34.95 40.96
85% Speed (85% of vehicles travelling) 40.01 46.24
Mode Speed (at or below most fequently occuring) 33 42
A review of the accident history for this intersection from January I, 1991 through September 30,
1995 (a period of 4.75 years) shows no reported accidents at this intersection. Based on the good
safety record of this intersection, the recent re-striping of Terra Nova Drive, and the low number of
points under the warrants, staff docs not recommend the installation of an all-way stop at this
intersection.
Hidden Vista Drive and Terra Nova Drive
Hidden Vista Drive intersects with the northwest side of Terra Nova Drive to form aT-intersection.
Hidden Vista Drive at Terra Nova Drive is 42' wide and now has an ADT of 1830 vehicles per day.
Staff completed two all-way stop warrant evaluations recently. One study was completed before
Terra Nova Drive was opened to Rancho del Rey Parkway and one study after. These evaluations
revealed that the intersection at Hidden Vista Drive received a total of 14 and 17 points, respectively
on the before and after studies. The three point increase between the two studies is due to the traffic
volume increase on both these streets. Hidden Vista Drive volumes, near Terra Nova Drive,
increased from approximately 1000 ADT to 1830 ADT due to the extension of Terra Nova Drive
to Rancho del Rcy Parkway. Terra Nova Drive volumes south of Hidden Vista Drive also increased
from 1480 to 1740 ADT
Pedestrian studies were also completed at this intersection, and the number of pedestrians was also
less than 50. Since there are no sidewalks along the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive in the vicinity
of this intersection, pedestrians must now cross at Beacon Place to Westview Drive. Pedestrians
would then use the existing sidewalk along the west curbline of Terra Nova Drive, and walk south
towards Hidden Vista Drive. The entire east side of Terra Nova Drive in this area has a landscaped
slope and no sidewalk. Therefore, if an all-way stop is to be considered for this intersection, a
sidewalk and retaining wall must be constructed along the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive from
Beacon Place and Dawn Court so that pedestrians can walk towards Hidden Vista Drive, a distance
of approximately 250' A $15,585.00 cost estimate for the all-way stop at Hidden Vista Drive
includes: $1,135.00 for signs and markings: $3,450.00 for four (4) pedestrian ramps and $1 1,000.00
for 2] 0 lineal feet of sidewalk and retaining walL
A review of the accident history for this intersection from January I, 1991 through September 30,
1995 (a period of 4.75 years) showed one reported accident. This accident occurred on August 15,
1995 at 5 :31 P.M. and was caused when an eastbound motorist on Hidden Vista Drive did not stop
at the existing stop sign and made a left turn in front of a southbound vehicle on Terra Nova Drive.
/.5 "J
Page 4, ltem~
Meeting Date 1/16/96
Since the eastbound motorist did not stop at the existing stop sign, this accident could not have been
prevented by the installation of an all-way stop. The sight distance at this intersection is adequate
for motorists.
Gap Studies
Staff completed three vehicular gap studies. Gap studies measure the amount of headway or time
interval between vehicles and determine if there is a sufficient number of opportunities for
pedestrians to cross the street Terra Nova Drive in the vicinity of Beacon Place, has a curb to curb
wIdth of 58'. Using a tYPIcal walking speed of 4 feet per second and a 2.5 second decision/reaction
time, it takes a pedestrian approximately 17 seconds to walk across the street.
These gap studies were conducted during the morning, noon and evening vehicular peak periods,
since this would be the most difficult time for pedestrians to cross. Gaps greater than 17 seconds
allow pedestrians sufficient time to walk across thc street. Study results show:
Gap Study Summary
Penod # Gaps Gaps per Average Gap Vehicles!
Minute (Seconds) Period
7:45 - 9:15 a.m. 215 2.39 19.2 254
12:00 - 1 :00 p.m. 116 1.93 20.9 128
3:30 - 4:45 p.m. 193 2.57 17.3 219
Traffic volumes on Terra Nova Drive are light throughout most ofthe day with adequate gaps for
pedestrians. During the a.m. peak period, when volumes arc the highest, gaps in tranic average at
least 19 seconds which is an adequate time interval to walk across the street. Therefore, based on
these studies, there are a sut1icient number of opportunities for pedestrians to cross the street.
The Safety Commission was concerned over the lack of a sidewalk along the east side of Terra Nova
Drive and the prevailing speed of motorists. Due to the roadway grade, it was difficult to keep
vehicular speeds low. Thus, the Commission feIt that only by installing stop signs at one of the two
intersections would vehicular speeds decrease because the motorists were apparently disregarding
the posted 35 mph speed limit signs. Ultimately, the Commission felt that the preferred intersection
for an all-way stop was at the Terra Nova Drive intersection with Beacon Place and Westview Drive.
Staff Recommendation
Since both the intersections at Hidden Vista Drive and Beacon Place/Westview Drive have an
excellent safety record; volumes are relatively low; there is no demonstrated congestion, pedestrian
or right-of-way assignment problem; and there is a sufficient gap for pedestrians to cross, staff
recommended to the Safety Commission and is reeommending to the City Council that the request
for an all-way stop be denied at eaeh of these intersections on Terra Nova Drive.
1.5'"'/
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 1/16/96
//
While staff does not recommend the installation, we believe that if the City Council were to approve
installation of an all-way stop, the most optimum location would be at the intersection of Beacon
Place/Westview Drive. Traffic volumes entering Terra Nova Drive from either Hidden Vista Drive
or Beacon Place/Westview Drive arc not significant and there is a minor sight restriction and a
greater pedestrian demand at Beacon Place. Additionally, an all-way stop at Beacon Place/Westview
Drive would negate the need fur a sidewalk and retaining wall along the east curbline of Terra Nova
Drive. Under this plan, with the benefit of the stop sign, the pedestrians walking from Beacon Place
and Dawn Court area could use the existing sidewalk on the west side of Terra Nova Drive and
proceed towards Hidden Vista Drive where they would then continue west towards the park and
school. If the Council determines that the all-way stop should be installed at the intersection of
Hidden Vista Drive/Terra Nova Drive, then staff would recommend that a sidewalk also be
constructed along the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive between Beacon Place and the intersection
of Hidden Vista Drive so that any pedestrian desiring to cross from Hidden Vista Drive to Beacon
Place would cross at the all-way stop controlled crossing point.
All area residents and the Principal of Clear View Elementary School, Dr. Ginger Hovenic, have
been notified of tonight's meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
All-Way Stop Costs (including construction of any necessary sidewalk and curb ramps plus
pavement striping) at: I) Beacon Place/Westview Drive/Terra Nova Drive: $3,076.20 and 2) Hidden
Vista Drive/Terra Nova Drive: $15,585.00. There are no funds budgeted fur either of these
installations. The City Council would have to appropriate the amount necessary to complete an
installation if one is approved by Council. Installation of signs and pavement markings only at a
cost of $],135 for each intersection can be accomplished within the existing operational budget.
Attachments: Area Plat
Area Striping Plat (Exhibit A)
All-Way Stop Studies (2 @ Beacon Place & 2 @ Hidden Vista Drive)
Gap Studies (a.m./mid-day/p.m.)
Safety Commission Minutes (Excerpt) dated 9/14/95
Safety Commission Minutes (Excerpt) dated 10/12/95
Petition From Area Residents
Speed Limit-Engineering/Traffic Survey
File No: 0760-95-CY029
0120-IO-KYJ 19
0100-15-KY157
FXR:dmw
M ;\IIOME\F.NGINEER\AGENDA\TERRANOY, FXR
If-f-)1-?
RESOLUTION NO.
/.8"/3"1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $3,100 FROM THE
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF AN ALL-WAY STOP AND
PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AT THE INTERSECTION OF TERRA
NOVA DRIVE/BEACON PLACE/WESTVIEW DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Traffic Engineer has received a petition
with 56 signatures requesting an all-way stop and crosswalk be
installed on Terra Nova Drive at either the intersection of Hidden
vista Drive or beacon place/Westview Drive; and
WHEREAS, since both the intersections at Hidden vista
Drive and Beacon Place/Westview Drive have an excellent safety
record; volumes are relatively low; there is no demonstrated
congestion, pedestrian or right-of-way assignment problem; and
there is a sufficient gap for pedestrians to cross, staff
recommended to the Safety Commission and is recommending to the
city Council that the request for an all-way stop be denied at each
of these intersections on Terra Nova Drive; and
WHEREAS, the safety Commission at its October 12, 1995
meeting voted 7-0 to oppose staff's recommendation and to install
an all-way stop at Terra Nova Drive and Beacon Place/Westview Drive
as a Trial Traffic Regulation and a report back to the Commission
in three to four months after the installation of the stop signs
which addressed speed concerns; and
WHEREAS, if Council approves the installation of an all-
way stop, it will be necessary to appropriate $3,100.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby appropriate $3,100 from the
unappropriated balance of the General Fund for the installation of
an All-Way stop and Pedestrian Ramps at the intersection of Terra
Nova Drive/Beacon Place/westview Drive.
Presented by
APted
\
as )0 form ~y
\ (
V1'l . /
BoogCl'a d, city
,
\
\
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\RS\STOPSIGN.TER
15~?
,---:_ -- \t / .. '* /
~ p. :: ~ /S
, :N~t I .
jB~~ h ~
~(f' --~
'+ 'ri.!. ~ ...,....
I- r-L ~. ' .
l-- ,~~ !It..-,
., Ir-' ........ 7 y.~ '" .
'\.YI ..: ~' \
\~ I\\. \
, IT\ It;i>
~ ~
~ ...
Jl .
OC' '"
I ,..
. (J ..J
III
7, ";;:.1>,,,"" ~ .... :? .0.
r::: '- \/7/t <<.1 " ::> ~J U
L" T ~ ~ <
,.., _ U7f!!&- ",...q'l; 'lr- """ ' \
, . ~ f.J. (,) w
>..._ 3111~O~ 'r-"\ -:,- 'iI ~ -- z ~ LLJ
~~W:,.",.' ~ ~ ~ ,~\/-7; ~ ,
.,d,'" ~. ., a:
","~'>i.~'.-l~~' ~O/S Q Z ~
\~."~ . ..-'.a,\. )f
.. ." ,.'t\._,.,.~." ~~ 0
~'\o. '.. '.'" ..::.- ",'..' . <
,!...,..,~:\...\,.,if""'''':-''' ~~ (,)
.... "f,"'~.;.t ~'..c ,.,'- ,., \. < "- It
~.,... .' ....... . .
.,....,':.'!/',...'.,mi" ~ · :
" .....'..~\.l' ()..... "/ "'-
. ._ .~,,',: 6'Q
~ ...
. ,,~~ .',..- ..-" .
I. ~ o. " ,
. o.Gi " '-o..,;ti'",' ~, .... 1::' , ,
I .. ~ ~~ ..
. /'::'~ .' ~ ( ,
/~ 1-~ C'" ....~ ~ ~
j
& H"~ \' \J.....: 2 ~. ,\ 1/.: -
~
'~../'-fI1~ ~. ~~. WI I
-:;'A. _.8 '''''a' ~ >
~\T \~~.~ \.' ...l
...l
~ -' T ~~..' \~~~~. 'f' . w
I n! ] I z
~ .'.:' ~ 'x,4 Z
1......1- / ~'\:' 0 Ill.
t: ';-~"...~. ~. c
. A;'" CIl
i , - tl1 r ~') ~\ /' ...
.., III
J f i!1 ! ...
. ~ It . " 0
.!L' ' \' . ~
/,~~ Ie ...
..1 . ..
DI =
oj. ~ .00 I t ~
Iii
1 .._ -
;,C) ---.J 0 !
VICINITY
~ t
~ TO: East oW Street
.
~
:'1
~~
, \
~,:.
'.
'\
'~
^,
",
c,
~~'
KEY
!,;,,"'~"/;_' ~ Existing
....., '0' 4";--;
- . . , Sidewalk
--(TO: East oW Street
_. I
~: 1,)'. ~..--;;"';'~.~.~" ;i-7("'~~~
~" 9(p' P
D.J61ft:D <, " /, ,
J.v/.{/7Ec
100'
"
"-
'"
lJ
I
l'ltJ(,
TERRA
NOVA
,
k"J
<2',,"
D+ 9.;;;/
"1IV~'HCD
<;' JvL/,'lE .
~t
~'U1lt r:..
~/~ ;,.
/
( 'j
.~ ""
.' '/
~/
~~
.,
C'
Subject Area
MAP
!'"
~
~
Q.
',.. -H.
5/18/95
Existing Striping Pattern
.m
x
~
C"
Drawn By:
D.M. Wolfe
TITLE:
Dille:
-
".
COUNCn.. POLICY
CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
SUBIEcr: ALL.WAY STOP POLICY EFFEcrlVE
NUMBER DATE PAGE
478-03 04-23-91 30F9
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23-91
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL.WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
,A!co/q Dr,'~e./we.s-lIl;e..J Dr;~e./BeA='" f/--e. Date: 'I /~B/rS'
,
INTER.SECTION ~rrq Total Points /3
, ,
Major Street/Mmor Street ( ~() 'f .00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and
decrease accidents. Generally, an all.way stop is reserved for the use at the intersection of cwo through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure pnor to signalization. Stop signs are not to be used
for speed control.
The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on faccual data. Warrants to be
considered include:
J Accident records
2 Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedesman volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are 54. The installation of an all.way
stop control is justified wllh a minimum of 30 pomts, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL.WAY STOP POI!'.'! SYSTEM CRJTERJA:
1. ACCIDENT WAAR.M.,.:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an all.way stop control during
one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all.way Stop: .Q.
Maximum 14 points t,phil -f1111"~/~CORE: .ff...Points
2. UNUSUAL CONDITION WAAR.M'T:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fife Slation, playground, horizontal or vertical
,
3
//
.'
II
1
COUNCIL POLlCY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECf: All.WAY STOP
POLlCY
NUMBER
EFFECIlVE
DATE
478-03 04-23-91
I DATED: 04-23-91
PAGE
40F9
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147
curves, etc., points are assigned on the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subjecT intersection. In residential neighborhoods where there
is a concentration of school age children aCTivities separaTed from the residential neighborhood by a
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the (if\' Traffic En~neer may apply aaffic
engineering judgmenT and waive the 30'pOlnT minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for
an all.way stOp control.
The 30.point minimum requirement mAY be waived and an all.way STOp mAY be inSTalled only if less
restriCTive controls have not corrected a documented problem.
AlI.way STOpS mav be justifIed based on projected volumes and accident frequency when traffic signals
are warranted and wiJl be instaJled within a specified period of Time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE: ifL- Points
PEDESTRJA."i VOLUMES
Consideration is given TO large numbers of pedestrians crossing The major STreeT during the four busiest
hours of an average day.
Pedestrian CrOSSiM Maior Street Totol dunn~ 4 busiest rraffic hours
vOlumesM 51.100 101.150 151.200 201.0VER
Points: V 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
SCORE: -L Points
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the intersection during the four
busiest hours of an average day.
;l
~
4-
/:j /1
COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
SUBJECT: ALL.WAY STOP POLICY EFFECIlVE
NUMBER DATE PAGE
478-03 04'23-91 SOF9
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16]47 DATED: 04-23-91
Tnihc Counts (circle four highesr hour volumes):
Hour Endin~ AI: V f t
Oil 06000700'08000900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700'1800 1900 2000
NB :<. ;;3 5C, 93 37 .23 '13 ~7 3:<" 88 '11 70 5& 'Iv 5:1..
5B /{ M NI (Po. '18 3;2. 35 f'! '1/ ~Z (PI 5'1 52 (pO '12
EB :2 /7 /3 6 7 8 '1 t .9 7 9 ~ /~ B 8 ,JE'<""-V"~ W
WB 2- 7 Cj /3 8 B 7 7:5 5 12 /2 /2 /2 12- I3EAGC~
T J-/ f/& :2/9 ~(j" /00 'if ~J. eLf e~ /~l /5i 1'12 /3"- /50 IN
Traffic Volumes Warrant
Points shaJl be assigned in accordance with the foJlowing tables:
Toral of Major Toral of Mmor
Approach Legs Approach Legs
'I-hour Volume Points 'I-hour Volume Points
(0. 1000 /p "S~ o~ CO. 400 7(" 0']
1001 - 1300 1 401 - bOO 1
1301 - 1600 2 601 . 800 2
1601 - 1900 3 801 . 1000 3
1901 .2200 4 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 . 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 . 1600 6
2901 . 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 . over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: ,/:2 Poinls, SCORE: ~ Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5
- c
II COUNCIL POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECT: All.WAY STOP POLICY EFFECfIVE
NUMBER DATE PAGE
47H.U3 04.23.91 60F!J
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147 I DATED: 04-23.91
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE .
AlI.way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach traffic volumes are nearly equal.
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following table:
24.Hour Minor St Approach Volumes 300 10 /'f (~7,;
24.Hour Maior St ApProach Volumes x 100% - IftJ'T'f ~/8fpoints
95 . 100 10 (7.7
BS . 94 9
75 - B4 B
65 - 74 7
55 . 64 6
45 . 54 5
35 - 44 "
25 34 3
(15 24 /8 7" 2.)
5 . 14 1
o . 4 0
SCORE: 2. Points
Maximum 10 Points
CAL TRA."'S CRJTERJA (Challler 4 CaITrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi.way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed. the multiway stop may be an interim measure
that can be installed quickly to conn-ol traffic while arrangements are being made for the Signa}
instillation. N~ ~ '0
2.
An accident problem. as indicated by five or more reponed accidents within a 12 month period of a type
susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such accidents include right. and left.turn
collisions as well as right-angle collisions. tJo ~~
3. Minimum traffic volumes
a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 500
vehicles per hour for any B hours of an averag. day, and J)~
-ruRJ L :;vo f
II
-f.t,
/_'J .///'
SUBJECT: All...WAy STOP
COUNCiL POLICY
CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
POLICY EFFECI1VE
NUMBER DATE
478-03 04.23.91
I DATED: 04-23.91
PAGE
70F9
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16]47
b. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor Itreet or highway must average at
lust 200 units per hour lor the same a houn, with an average delay to minor Itreet vehicular
traffic ol at Just 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour. but
C. When the as.percentile approach speed of the major Itreet traffic exceeds 40 miles per hour, the
minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent ol the above requirements.
Z-OO ..,t... O. 7;;:: I L/O tn'1
~
;:J:;J
i? 0 ~ \,<,.-'8
~~
L NO V ph J
n "7 000 ,,4~
0(;.00 -..J( ,.
Is ;J. y v f'11 [d1J\.
,....,A"'- c-
~ ~cL; ,:/0700
~ L-
17 .'f4 --'> <- {\i/,A
{JJeJ,,~ { ,-- fh.~
1
/ '
/
SUBJECf: All-WAY STOP
COUNCn.. POLICY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
POLICY EFFECTIVE
NUMBER DATE
478-03 04-23-91
DATED: 04.23.91
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147
]!\ 'TI.RSECTI ON:
/>J.L.WAY STOP SUMMARY
( ;101 -00)
DATE 1/'.'VtSTIGATION WAS CO:v1PLETED: 't /:U/'lS
TOT/>J. SCORE:
control is 30 points.
l/'."TERSECTION DIAGRA\1:
(;J[51 V / EW
RECOMMENDATIONS:
/3
PAGE
80F9
points out of a possible 54. The minimum required to justify an aU-way stop
I
81
I
L I
DIf.
VI
~
"tl
,-
't'
..,~ LI'
-I' 7
~;I~~).f
N;dole-" ,/iJ-f'l DI'"
REMARKS:
III
I
I
1.1
I
I
4
f\
.4' ,.
. ~\~'~,~
~1-\~~.t
.
1/
I~
E fllC/IV PL
c.I-d. -S..c.
~
$=.
/'). /?-
COUNCIL POLlCY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SUBJECf: All-WAY STOP POLlCY EFFECl1VE
NUMBER DAlE PAGE
478-03 04-23.91 90F9
I I DATED: 04-23-91
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147
Cln' OF CHUl.A VlSTA
AU.WAY STOP EVAlUATION WORKSHEET
Intersection kr~ }/ov",Dr ,'VG-/vVO+If;e..,; f);/vt./8eJl&-I>" f'","- File K/-//9
Date 'I/;lf /9s
(Major) / (Minor) r Investigator~
Qualifies for A11.Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes _ No ~ Points ...13...
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other cntoria: Yes - NO...x-
If yes, explain:
Sketch of intersoction With visibility data
On back Attached X
1. Accident History Points Possible
From " / I / 9'1 to S- /3/ / 9.!>/
AccidenlS/yr correctable by StOpS X 2 pts/accident ~101
2 Unusual Conditions ,R . J ' o IS +".. c..e--
~~~!c-+ 5'f+
e ~Q /'z::. L- ..lQ.
10
3. Pedesaian Volume 1
Pedesaians /- 5"'0 5
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
4. Traffic Volumes (peak 4 Hours) :$:150
Major approaches 6~.s-
Minor approaches 7(.,
5. Traf!ic Volume Difference /&~ ;{ 10
TOTAl ~So1
Minimum Points Required 30
~
I
'/
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
~hY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
Iv. BE.AccW PL..
INTERSECTION /€~ /Il.JV4 l>1? wE.STVJEIH J>J2.
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: r/lr/9r
Total Points /9
( ;;J.o~ -DO)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed Ill-way stop cln effectively Issign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, Ind decrease Iccidents. 'enerally, In
Ill-way stop ts reserved for the use It the intersection of two through
highways, Ind only IS In interim traffic control lIM!asure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The post i ng of an intersect i on for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. ~he total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control ts justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop:
Maximum 14 points 3/1/,'1 ~D ;1../.l6/?.>- SCORE:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
JL
g
.
Points
2. UNUSUAL CONDITION W~RRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such IS I school, fire stltion,
playground, horizontal or vertiCil curves, etc., points are Issigned on
the basts of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
res i dent ia 1 neighborhoods where there ts I concentrat i on of school Ige
children Ictivities separated from the residential neighborhood by I
ill
/ ')- /.f'
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
. ~ .
The 30-point minimum requirement mAYbe waived and an all-way stop mAY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops E1Y be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
10 Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: ~ 51-100 101.150 151-200 201.0VER
Points: \V 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points SCORE: 1 Points
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour volumes):
Hour Ending At:
~ ~ J !
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200'1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
HB 2- 9 If ')..D /8 /9 ),0 ;'f 2/ 2.7 3tJ 30 3~ 28 28
(J P ~. ~' g e 0 .r) $ tJ i1 .~ ~) .'~ .
SB f6 J
EB l /7 13 g 7 B 7 , 8 7 ? (p /0 8 B
liB ;L 7 9 /3 B 8 7 7 5 5 Il /2 /2 12- /2-
T ~ 32 3Go '1/:.33 3Si3~ 37 31/ 3~ 5/ '18 58 l/S ~8
I
-2.
It
//
Traffic Volumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Tota 1 of Tota 1 of
~ajor Approac~ Legs . Ai flor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points .-hour Volume Points
( o - 1000 1~"1 o ) ~ 0 - 400 81 o )
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600 1
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 4 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: Jl Points SCORE: .{t. Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
S. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes 300
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100% . "100 = 75%Points
95 - 100 10
( 85 - 94 : )
75 - 84 ? 5' '7.
65 . 74 7
S5 - 64 6
45 - S4 5
35 . 44 4
25 . 34 3
15 - 24 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: B Points
Maximum 10 Points
-7- -td..
/ 'J -;/, /!
CALTRANS CRITERIA CChaoter 4 CalTrans Traf~)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals Ire warranted Ind urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that cln be instilled quickly to control traffic
while Irrangements Ire being made for the signal installltion.
2. An Iccident problem, IS indicated by five or more reported Iccidents
within I 12 month period of I type susceptible to correction by I multiway
stop installation. Such Iccidents include right- Ind left-turn collisions
IS well IS right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(I)
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from 111
Ipproaches must Iverage It least 500 vehicles per hour for Iny a
hours of In Iverlge day, and
The combined vehicular Ind pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must Iverage It least 200 units per hour for the ume a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
When the as-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
(b)
(c)
~ ~~
/,/.
.""'C
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION:
( ~ 0 r -DO)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: ~;l1S-;l9s'
TOTAL SCORE: /9 points out of I possible 54. The ~inimum
required to justify In Ill-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
8
~
S~'f
l;f~
I+l~
~
I..
WE5TV/EtJ) Of?
v..
~
~
~
~
"l 8ee,c- fl,,<.L
Cwl.J.. - s",-
L.;~o\
;ll f)
. ~~
" -+'
\/
'l
('
L
L
RECOMMENDATIONS:
H/clJen V/S-fQ Dr
REMARKS:
WPC SS46E
~
/ ,) .....:)2
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Intersection
-rery-q ,ve",r, Dr / 8UlC;~ l'';{,l!sft/e./Vi>r
(Major) / (Minor)
File
Date .5"//.J-/"~-
.
Invest igator In :J[)
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No X Points --11-
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No X
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached)(
1.
Accident History
From 3/1/9'" to ~ /~e/9S-
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
Points Possible
a'
14
2. Unusual Conditions
I(e~~r,'c.fecl S,_~;, t' D;s ~4Itc."'"
I/o,..,'%. C",,"vc=..-
lIerf;c.c,/ C",,..,,,e...
/0
10
3;. Pedestriin Volume
Pedestrians 1- .5'0
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
..t
5
4. Traffic VolUDes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches /;z If
Minor approaches ~I
@'
@
..
5
10
5.
Traffic Volume Difference
75%
9
10
TOTAL I' 54
MinilUa Points Required 30
WPC 5546E
-~ l6"
~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
J H IbC>EN
INTERSECTICN T~~ NOVA Dg. VIS,T"A C>~
Major Street/Hi nor Street
Date: S jlr h ~
Total Points J..:J- ) ~
( .(;).03 -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop 15 reserved for the use at the intersection of two through
highways, and only IS an interim traffic control llleasure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The post i ng of an intersect i on for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
e
.
@
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop:
.JIII?'!.fC Z/ZE/f.5 SCORE:
Points
Maximum 14 points
2. UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such IS I school, fire stltion,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc.. points Ire assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within SOD feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there 15 a concentration of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
tb
/' -J/./
,/ c..--"\ /
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the City Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 3D-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 3D-point minimum requirement m1Y be waived and an all-way stop m1Y be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops IIlU be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
.'
If} Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration 1s given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
VOlumes:~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: ~ 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points SCORE: ~ Points
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour volumes):
Hour Ending At: ~
~ ~ ~
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
.-
HB 2 /5 37 '1 22 Z.Z 311 3'- 3~ 11.5' 57 l/7 yt 39 3/
SB 'i 71 :/B 3D 20 22 2/ 20 23 22. 2~ 23 23 )/ :2/
EB / 5' ? 15 /0 /2 N /3 15' 20 2(P :ll J.i 17 /3
~ 0 t5 ()' ~ , - (I f (} @ ,,'5
WB I ~. 8 {) ~
T 7 ~Lf 7tf N~ 52 Sf., &7 (p~ 73 87 /0/ U 13 11 iPS
I
.t'- 1'1
,
Traffic Volumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of
Major Approach Legs
Total of .
Minor Approach Legs
~..hour Volume
Points
C-hour Volume
Points
3$1 Q)
1
2
3
4
5
4
3
2
1
o
,f1.. Points
B~ DJ
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
.t1. Poi nts
(0 - 1000
1001 - 1300
1301 - 1600
1601 - 1900
1901 - 2200
2201 . 2600
2601 - 2900
2901 . 3200
3201 . 3500
3501 - 3800
3801 - over
(0 - 400
401. 600
601 - 800
801 . 1000
1001 . 1200
1201 . 1400
1401 - 1600
1601 . 1800
1801 - 2000
2001 . 2200
2201 . over
SCORE:
Maximum 5
SCORE:
Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All -way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes ""D.' ~ z....s- ~
24-Hour Ma ior St. Aooroach Vol urnes X 100% . I;~O :~ It<'
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 6
45 - 54 5
~ i: ~~~~ cD
5. 14 1
0- 4 03
SCORE' ~ p",t,
Maximum 10 Points
-.r--tt: .
. " /j /
/ --:/. _~ k-:
CAlTRANS CRITERIA lChaoter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway ~top
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported Iccidents
within a 12 month period of I type susceptible to correction by I Ilultiway
stop installation. Such Iccidents include right- Ind left-turn collisions
as well IS right-Ingle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from III
Ipproaches Ilust Iverage at least SOO vehicles per hour for Iny 8
hours of an Iverage day, and
The combined vehicular Ind pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must Iverage at least 200 units per hour for the ume a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
(b)
(cl
When the as-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
-J'C t <1
- ;/
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION: ?errq j!PV4 Dr;.-e/II/c1t1,,, II/.sf.; Dr/tie- ( ;?()3 -DO)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: 5//5'/i~
TOTAL SCORE: 14 points out of I pcssible 54. The IIi nimum
required to justify In Ill-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM: 9 r
~
I
..I ~
I ~
I
I 0:;
~
I ~
I
I
I I 05~" lJ/rNE
JI/c:ldel7 ~I
/If" ~
or ~
~;\ S
\\\~ I~
. ~~ ~
d.'
(t t "
N
RECOMMENDATIONS: I~
REMARKS:
WPC 5546E
-)'-~..
/'j -:.;:If
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Intersection
;7e,.~ AJ"vt! /)"'/~e-
(Major)
/I'lJe"V;lq fl,.;ve-
(Minor)
F11e
Date (/1..(/f.5
Investigator I'1jLJ
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No ,X Points : \ l--\
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
No X
Yes
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached ><
1.
Accident History
From 3 / 1 / 7''1 to :2. /:<8'/ 9'S
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 pOints/accident
Points Possible
f5
I
14
2,
Unusual Conditions
AI" Side-wof) CI'l ee>s-f S,c1(!... "f -rJ./IJ.-
}!or"?- 'f- lIer--f,'c-",1 C-c.Jr-ve-.$
.5/~ /,+ f):5-1'C,,,c.-e- So""'[: 1A.J0Qf' r~sl-,./c...ke.el
./
10
/0
3.
Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians I - 5"0
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
5
-1
4.
Traffic Volu.es (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches 35/
Minor approaches t9(;
5
10
g
e-
.
5. Traffic YolUlle Difference -
~Sk
TOTAL
Mini.ua Points Required
3 10
I{ 54
30
~PC 5546E
-ft- B. l
,"j
COUNCll.. POllCY
CTY OF QIULA VISTA
IUBJECI'
ALL-WAY STOP
POUCY
~-- --
EF1'EC11VE
. .~".,
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147
478-03 04-23-91 1 of 9
J)~~ 04-23-91
BACKGROUND
The CaHrans Traffic Manual and the Menual on Unifol'll Traffic Control
Dev1ces list cr1teria in determ1ning the need for an all-way stop.
Actual need for an an-way is detenn1ned by an engineering study wh1ch
exam1nes the spec1al characteristics of the site. .
All-way stop signs are very restrictive contro1s since they require all
motorists entering the intersection to stop at an times. When stop
signs are installed for speed control Ind/or there is no apparent traff1c
reason for the stop (little or no cross traff1c), eotorfsts regard the
stop s 1 gn IS an unnecessary hlped1ment and often tillles do not illite a
complete stop. When this occurs the expectations of other drivers Ind
pedestrians are al tered, thereby jeopardizing the safety performance of
the intersect1on. Although speeds w111 be lower in the vicinity of the
stop, speeds will be higher midblock IS IlOtorists try to ealteup for the
t1me lost at the unwarranted stop sign. Another negative aspect of
unwarranted stop signs is the increase in n01se and pollution as vehicles
apply the1r brakes to slow down and Iccelerate out of the intersect10n.
It is impractical al\j imposs1ble to install In all-way sto (or other
traff1c control dev1ce such as a traff1c signal) whenever and wherever I
request is made; otherwise dur1ng peak periods, extended delays to
motorists may resul t, thus forc1ng ectorfsts to seek al ternate routes
through parallels streets, often a res1dential arta. A Traff1c
Engineer's primary goal is to Maintain safety and reduce vehicle delay.
PURPOSE
The purpose of I fully justif1ed, properly installed 111-way stop is to
effect1vely ass1gn r1ght-of-way, ..intain safety and reduce veh1cle
delay. &enerlny, all-way stops are instilled where traff1c signals Ire
warranted and/or an acc1dent history has been ind1cated by reported
Iccidents of a type susceptible to correction by an all-way stop.
POLICY STATEMENT
It shall be the poliCY of the CIty of Chu1a Vista, through the Departlnent
of Public Works/Engineer1ng Division, to warrant the instanat10n of
All.Way Stops in accordance ~th the following policy statements:
~
/,->' -:J ('
COUNCll... POUCY
CITY OF aruLA VISTA
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
POUCY
NUMBER
Ef1'ECI1VE
DAre PAGE
ADOPTED BY: Reso' ution No. '6147
478-03 04-23-91 2 of 9
DA~ 04-23-91
The California Vehicle Code, Section 21350 thru 21355, gives the
authority to local agencies to insta'l all..ay stop traffic controls
upon streets in their respective jurisdiction.
According to Federa' and Stlte traffic control guidelines, a"..ay
stop installations should be reserved for the control of vehicular
traffic conflicts at intersections and should not be used as devices
to control speed.
The City's policy for the installation of an a'l..ay stop control is
based on a point system. Points are assigned to traffic factors
based on the severity of traffic cond1tions. Factors ~asured are:
,. accident records
2. unusual conditions
3. pedestrian volumes
4. traffic volumes
5. traff1c volume differentials
~3
,/
COUNCIL POUCY
CTY OF CiULA VISTA
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
roucy
EFfECI1VE
478-03
04-23-91
3 of 9
ADOP'IED BY: Resolutfon No. 16147
I)JL~ 04-23-91
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP tON1ROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION -rer~ 'v.?~ol O,.iv-e-l!I/lrI~Ii:s-lcr IJrive.-
P1aJor Street/PI' nor Street
Date: '1/;if/9.$-
.
Totll 'ofnts .;;;t/7.
( " b 3 -tlU I
GENERAL:
A fu11y justified, properly fnstalled all-way stop can effectfvely assfgn
rfght of way, reduce vehicle de"y, and decrease accfdents. &enerelly,
an a" -way stop 15 reserved for the use at the intersectfon of two
through highways, Ind only IS a~ interfm trafffc control ..a sure prfor to
sfgna1ization. Stop sfgns are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of In intersection for 111-way stop control should be based
on factua1 data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume dffference
5. Pedestrian y01ume
Points are assfgned to each of these warrlnts. The total points possfb1e
Ire 54. The installation of an all-way stop control 15 justfffed wfth a
~fnfmum of 30 pofnts, unless any one of the CalTrans crfterfa is let.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assfgned for tach accident susceptible to correction
by an all-way stop control durfng one fun y.ar ,rfor to the
investfgation date. .
Totll number of accfdents correctible by al1-way stop: .~
Maximum 14 pofnts toft/flrl "~"r SpillS SCORE: -1!J Pofnts
.~
/ ~)--iJ
COUNCll.. POUCY
CITY OF 0fULA VISTA
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
POUCY
NUMBER
I!FFECI1VE
DA'IE PAGE
478-03
.
04-23-91 " of 9
DA~ 04-23-91
ADOPTED BY: Resolution No. 16147
2. UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such IS a school, fire station,
pleyground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned
on the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within SOD feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school
Ige children activities separated from the residentill neighborhood
by a collector street Ind coupled with other conditions, the C~ty
Traffic Engineer may Ipply traffic engineering judgment Ind wa ve
tne JU-polnt mlnimum point requirement to qualify the intersection
for an all-way stop control.
The 3D-point minimum requirement may be waived and an Ill-way stop
may be installed only if less restrictive controls have not
corrected a documented problem.
All-way stops may be justified based on projected volumes and
accident frequency when traffic signals are warranted Ind will be
installed within a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
10 Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the
..jor street during the four busiest hours of an Iverage day.
Pedestrian Crossing Major Street, Total during 4 busiest traffic hours
YOlumeS:~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-DVER
Points: ~ 2 3 4 5
Maxillum 5 points SCORE: 1. Pofnts
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points Ire dependent upon the magnitude of vehicullr volumes entering
the intersection during the four busiest hours of an Iverlge dey.
~5
COUNCIL POUCY
ary OF QIULA VISTA
SUBJECT fOUCY EF'fECI1VE
ALL-WAY STOP
478-03 04-23-91 5 of 9
ADOPnDBY: Resolution No. 16147 DA'IED: 04-23-91
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour volumes): (c..oO....'-X'#oC~)
'~ . 'Ar 15"/"<<
.." E'"'' t" *. ' ,,?Ji' .It I ,.I .v
3"0 11'-2-3.8 S~.
D1r 0600 0700 OSOO 0 0 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
HB ~ 23 5&( 93 31 23> if'!;> 27 32- 88 72 70 5% 7D 5)
/1 /" 91 ':)g ~D 7/ 61 5'1
SB SO /~ ~D I/Z 52 70 5i 72
EB 3 ;;'1 '(3 if? ;1.7 ;2.7 )0 lfO aY /07 7/ iP7 IJO.1 gz.. ~7
we tZJ (f rI if ff If ~ ~ f1 jJ tf If /I ,e ft
T zl" III 2~D 2 ~ I 124 12- 115 //1 //~ l~(P 1/3 /98 217 Z2~ /SJ.
Traffic Vol~s Warrant ,
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of Major Total of Minor
Approach Legs Approach Legs
4-hour Vol ume Points 4-hour Volume Points
~1000 7/)0 -OJ ~o - 400 ;/61 0)
10 - 1300 1 4 1 - 'bo 1
1301 - 1600 2 . 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 4 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 Z t 801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3BOO 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: g:. Points SCORE: ~ts
Max1num 5 '4 M1n111U1l 10
/., -.j~
I
COUNCIL POI.JCY
CITY OF ClHUlA VISTA--
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
POUCY
NlIMBER
EFFECITVE
DAm PAGE
ADOP"JED BY: Reso1ution No. 16147
478-03 04-23-91 6 of 9
DA~ 04-23-91
5. TRAFfIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the ~jor and ~inor street approach
traffic volumes are near1y equal. Points shall be assigned in
Iccordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Approach Vol urnes ". 970
.. 24-Hour MaJor St. Approach Volumes X 10ve . 0
. 15?
95 - 100
85 - 94
75 - 84
&~ H
,5.1.)
7~
=~ts S-~~
10
9
8
..,.,..,f -,
p_/
4
3
2
1
o ,~
- -
.;.,....~ ?oints
/
J~ -
25 -
15 -
5 -
o -
44
34
24
14
4
~ORE:
Maximum 10 Points
CALTRAIIS CRlTERIA (Chapter 4 CalTrans Trafffc Manual)
Any of the following conditions .ay warrant a .ulti-wlY STOP lign
installation:
1. Where traffic lignals are warrlnted and urgently needed, the .ultiwlY.
stop lilY be an interim lIIelSure that can be installed quickly to
control traffic while arrangements are being lIade for the lignal
instal laUon.
2. An Iccident problem, IS indiclted by fhe or ~re reported accidents
within I 12 ~nth period of I type lusceptfble to correction by a
IUltiway stop installltion. Such Iccidents include right- and
left-turn collisions as well IS right-Ingle collisions.
.'
a1
'~j '"
CoUNCIL POUCY
arY OF anJlA VISTA
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
roucy
~.
~::;~
_An",
478-03
04-23-91
I>A1ED:
7 of 9
ADOP'IED BY: Resolutfon No. 16147
04-23-91
3. Minimum traffic volumes
a. The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from a"
approaches ~ust average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any
8 hours of an average day, and
b. The combined vehicular ind pedestrian volume from the lIinor
street or highway lUst average at least 200 units per hour for
the same 8 hours, with an average delay to lIinor street
vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during
the maximum hour, but
c. When the as-percentile approach speed of the IIIjor street
traffic exceeds 40 lIiles per hour, the lIinimum vehicular
volume warrant is 70 percent of the above requirements.
~
/- )-3~,
COUNCll. POllCY
Cl'IY OF aruI.A VISl'A
SUBJECT
ALL-WAY STOP
ADOP1EDBY: Resolution No. 16147
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
roucy
NUMBER
EFfECI1VE
DAm PAGE
478-03 04-23-91 of 9
DA~ 04-23-91
INTERSECTION: 7erw)b.,4P" 1;~#(11 0 ( ;:( 03 -00)
(" .,$1<1 r
OATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETEO: 9/). f /e; s-
/~
iOTAL SCORE: ; . points out of a llossib1e 54.
required to justify an I I-way stop control 1s 30 points.
. I
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
~
The ainimum
:~
1:
<:::\
..
"
~
"
~l 1,,0.'"
e;~
"\;
~ ~
I
/lid}"." V:'.s f'~ fJrlll"-
RECOMMENDATIONS:
,\.tI
0..\" ."
v v"
REMARKS:
..~
./
/
.
COUNcn.. POllCY
CTY OF CiOLA VISI'A
SUB1ECT
ALL-WAY STOP
POUCY EfFECI1VE
ADOPlEDBY; Resolutfon No. 16147,
.78-03 04-23-'1' of 9
J)"~ 04-23-91
No X
Sketch of Intersection w1th Y1S1D)(tY aata
On back Attached .
1.
Accident History __
From (, 1 I / , 'I to 5 13 / 1 9.!>
Accfdents/yr correctable by Stops X 2 pts/accfdent
1'01nts 1'0sslble
t5 14
2.
Unusual condftfonsk I.
C) ,. le-,;'/(J! Q 0"
C' e.,.i,c.~ / C-u~~.$
Sch,,() x~ /Y1~ - 5/Q)r j).'~""''''I'ft:.e- Jt".f1~.vi1t'.f r~..f"/~1-J
,
10'
kr'r,,/JOvQ Dr
/0
I
3.
Pedestrfan Yolu.e
Pedestrfans 1- S-P
crossfng the ~or street durfng 4 hour count
Trafffc YolU1es (Peak. Hours)
Major approaches '700
Mfnor approaches ~ g/
Traffic Yol... Difference 55. .~
S
10
s
..
s.
f;
6'"" 10
/./'54
SO
TOTAL .
Mini.um Points Required
.~.
/5- 3f7
Gap EXAMI~E / EDIT DATA Dir Z
I fi:e ,ae Interva: 15 Oate/Tile 11/13/95 7 :~5 1M
N-S Street TERfA NJVA DRIVE Site Code 00020400
E-~ Street 8EACON 'L. / ~ESTVIE~ DR. Weather CLEAR
Tile TDT ! I 4 6 8 10 12 1~ 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 )30
7:45 3D ' 36 1 3 0 0 0 1 4 I I 0 3 0 I 1 14
8:00 44 : 47 5 5 1 3 2 3 2 6 3 2 1 2 0 2 7
8: 15 40 : 48 1 7 3 2 3 4 1 2 I 2 0 1 I 3 9
8:30 44 : 55 4 5 0 5 3 5 2 3 I I 0 3 2 0 10
8:45 36 , 44 , 2 4 5 1 2 3 1 1 2 0 I C 0 11
, .
9:CO 21 , 24 1 1 , 2 0 1 0 0 C 0 1 0 1 1 11
, , .
9: :5 I , I I I I I I J J I I I J I J J I
,
9:3C I , I I J I J J J J J J , I J J J I
,
9:45 J , J I I J , , J J J J J J I , J J
,
10:00 I , J J J J J J I I I J I J * I J I
,
10:15 , , J J J , J J J I I , I I I I J J
,
I iC:3~ I , , I , , , , I , J I J J J J J ,
,
10:45 J , J , I I I I I , J J J I J J J J
,
11: ~O . , I . J I J I I * J J J I J , I I
,
Fl: Hel, f3: Di rections f5: Codes f6: Oi r Titles Ese: Mer" 2.0
Ga: EXAMINE / EDIT CATA 0: r 2
F .1 e ~ ale I!iterval 15 Date/Tille L/13/95 7:45 ,M
N-S S Site C:de ~002:400
~I S~~maii Of Gap ,eading CJces ~eather :LEAR
I : '...:mber CC.iiited
I TimE 4 2 - 4 Se: Ga~ 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 )3)
7:45 t 4 - 6 4 1 1 0 , 0 1 1 14
.
E:OO I E : 6 - 8 2 6 3 2 1 2 0 , 7
,
8:1j 10: 8 - le' 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 , 9
.
5::0 I 12: 10 - 12 2 3 I 1 0 3 , 0 :0
,
3' - ~ I 14: 12 - 14 3 , 1 2 0 I 0 0 "
.-' , ..
\:00 16: 14 - It 0 0 0 0 I C I 1 11
9: 15 IS: 16 - 18 I J J J J J I , ,
9.1'l 20: 18 - 20 I * * * * J J I *
,'.
9:45 ". 20 . 22 , , J J J J J J ,
.. .
10:00 24 : 22 - 24 I * I * I I * J J
10:15 26: 24 - 26 J J J I J * * J I
10:3C 28: 26 - 28 . J J * * I J I J *
10:45 30: 28 - :0 , J * * J I J * J
11 :00 )30: Greater then 30 * J J * * * * , *
ORAWN BY O.M. Wolfe TITL-E
ITE 11120/95 AM PEAK 'HOUR GAP STUDY
.
at
-j
Gao
EXAMINE / EDIT DATA
I fIle Hame Interval
I ,-S Street TERRA NOVA OR:VE
E-W Street BEACON PL. / WESTVIEW DR.
Ti.e TOT ! I 4 6 B iO 12 14 16 IB 20 22 24 26 2B
Hoon 32: 36 2 2 lIS 0 4 2 _ 0 0 j
12:1S 33: J6 4 3 3 0 2 1 4 0 l 0 1 1
12: 3j 29: 33 3 2 1 1 0 j 2 0 2 1 3 2
12: 45 22: 13 1 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 0 0 1
1: CO t : I I * . 1 l . 1: I 1 * 1 I
1: IS * : tIt * .. 1: I 1 * * t * ,,'
1:30 l : t 1: l I * I 1 I
1 :45 1: : t l I I I I t
2:CO t I 1 .. t . . . t
2:15 . : 1: 1 . I .. . .
2:30 . : t 1: . . t . .
245 t : t i . 1: . .
3:00 .. : . t t 1 .. t
I 3:15
t : -*
f1: Helo
f3: Directions
f5: codes
15
Oate/Tile
Site Code
Weather,
.
.
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
.
.
.
,
fe: Di r 'i tIes
~a;
EX;M'HE I EDIT jAiA
Fi:e Na"e Inter\'al 15
N-~ C'
E-; ;! 'C'''''1 of Gap Heading Codes
I I: 'umoer Courted
'"e I 4: 2 - 4 See Gap
'oon 6 4 - 6
:; i; I ::: ~: J:
12:4, I 12: 10 - 12
;:00 I 14: 12 - 14
1: 15 16: 14 - 16
. 1: 30 18: 16 - IE
1:45 20: 18 - 20
2: 00 22: 20 - 22
2:15 24: 22 - 24
2:30 26: 24 - 26
2:45 28: 26 - 28 .
3:00 30: 28 - 30
3:15 )30: Greater then 30
ORAWN BY
D.M. Wolfe
TITL.E
Dat;jTime
Site Coce
weHMer
o
t . *' I
It. t
I I . ..
. I t t
. I . t
t I: t I
.. . I ..
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
Olr 2
11/13/9,
00020400
CLEAR
.
.
,
.
.
,
,
,
,
.
Ese: Me'u
li:OO PM
o
t
1
2
30 )30
1 13
o 10
1 10
o 10
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
t .
. ,
, .
, .
. .
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
, ,
...-
11'lJ.'95 :2: OJ ;,
C JC~24 Je-
tLEA,
,
,
o 1-)
1 10
o 10
16 18 20 22 24 26 28 3C :30
4 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 13
4 0 4 0 1 1 0
o 2 I 3 2 1
o 3 0 0 1
,
.
,
, ,
. .
.
,
,
,
,
.
.
,
,
.
.
, ,
, .
. ,
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
,
,
.
MID-DA Y PEAK
GAP STUDY
OATE
11/20/95
3-;(
/0-.// I )
,
.
.
,
t
Oi r 2
, ,
. ,
, .
, .
. .
. .
. ,
. ,
. .
. .
Gap EXA~INE / EDIT lATA Dir ~
File Name Interval 15 Date/Time 11/13/95 3:30 'M
N-3 Street TERRA NOVA DRIVE Si te Code 00C20400
E-, Street BEACON Pl. / .ESTVIE. DR. .eather CLEAR
.
Ti.e TOT : I 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 )30
3:30 39 ~ 46 2 5 3 , , 2 3 1 0 1 2 I , 0 11
" " .
3:45 42 : 46 8 4 2 3 3 3 0 3 3 3 0 2 1 0 7
4:00 31 : 35 1 7 0 2 0 2 2 0 2 I 0 0 2 0 12
4:15 47 , 56 11 9 4 2 1 2 1 3 3 0 2 1 0 0 9
,
UO 34 , 36 4 1 2 4 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 0 1 9
,
4:45 . , , , . , . . . . , . . . . . . .
, -
5:00 , , , . , . , , . . . . . . , , , ,
,
5: 15 , , . . . . . , . . , . . . . . . ,
,
5;30 , , , , . . . . , . . , . . . . , ,
,
5:45 , , , , , , , . . , , . , , , , . ,
6:CO , , , , , , , , . . , , , , , , , ,
,
6:15 , , , , . , , , , . , , , . , , , ,
6:;0 , , , , , . , , . . . , . , . , ,
\:45 , , , , , , , , . , , , , , , . , .
,
Fl: Help F3: Directions F5: Cooes F6: Oir Ti Les ~sc: l'Ier.u 2,0
I Ga~ E,A~;'E I EDIT DA-A Oir 2 I
File Na.,e Interval 15 Da teIT ime 11 /:3 /95 3:3J PM
N-; 3 Site Code OOC:~04CJ
E-\Ii ~ S;"ar1 of Gap Heading Codes Weatl1er CLEA,
# : ~Jmber Co'.:r,tej
Tae 4 2 - 4 See Gap 16 19 20 22 24 26 21 30 >3Q
3:30 6 : 4 - 6 3 1 0 1 ; I 2 ) 11
3:45 8 : 6 - 8 0 3 3 3 0 2 . 0 1
4:00 10: 6 - IO 2 0 2 J 0 0 2 0 12
4:15 :2: 10 . 12 1 3 3 0 , 1 0 0 9
.
4:30 I 14; 12 - 14 2 2 2 , 1 1 0 1 9
.
4:45 16: 14 - 16 . , . , . . . . .
5:00 :8: 16 - lB , . . . . . , . .
5: 15 20: lB - 20 , . . . , . . . ,
5:30 22: 20 - 22 . , . . . . . , ,
5:45 24: 22 - 24 I , , , , ., i I ,
6:00 26: 24 - 26 . . . , , . . , .
6: 15 28: 26 - 28 - i i . i i , i i i
6:30 30: 28 - 30 i , i i i I . . i
6:45 )30: Greater then 30 i i i I . I I . .
CRAWN BY D.M. Wolfe T%TL.E
I ATE 11120/95 PM PEAK HOUR GAP STUDY
33
//
Safety Commission Minutes
September 14, 1995
Page 5
9. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
JUM Admu,. 501 BHcon PUce, Chul. V~ CA ''''0, requested that an al!-way stop and crosswalk be installed
on Terra Nova Drive either at Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. Pedestrians crossed Terra Nova Drive to
access Clear view Elementary School, Terra Nova Park, and bus stops for the jr. and senior high school were in
jeopardy without traffic control. Neighborhood children were being driven to the locations which were less than
14 mile away due to safety concems of crossing Terra Nova Drive. Traffic volumes were increasing. Where Terra
Nova Drive intersected with Beacon Place and Hidden Vista Drive, there was a steep curved incline, Impairing
visibility. Vehicles also sped while ascending or descending the hill. The request was necessary for the safety
of neighborhood children.
Chair liken referred the item to staff for a full repon at the next meeting and included a request for notification
of neighbors and staff of Clearview Elementary School.
ST AFF REPORTS
10. ~ntzineerinC! elP Proiect Schedule
Frank Rivera updated the Commission on the Otay Valley Road Phase I project.
Chair liken asked the Commission if they felt it was necessary to continue receiving the CIP project schedule.
There was another CIP repon that staff prepared for other uses at the City, and then that information was placed
in the format the Commission received.
Vice-Chair Miller asked why the Commission needed to receive the repon on a monthly basis. If there was a
safety concern, then it would be brought to the Commission. She did not see a reason for creating an additional
repon for the Commission.
Chair liken asked the length of the other repon staff generated as compared to the four page repon the
Commission received.
Frank Rivera said the repon was two pages and included technical information. Previous Safety Commission
members had requested information on various City-wide projects and so the repon became standard. Cost was
also included in the repon, since it was of concern to previous commissioners.
Chair liken said the costs of projects was out the venue of the Safety Commission, and came under Council's
direction. He asked Hal Rosenberg the benefit of receiving the repon.
Hal Rosenberg said the repon reflected projects that could be related to traffic safety, but did not represent a traffic
safety issue, just new construction projects. He did not see how the repon benefitted the function of the Safety
Commission.
Shirley Buxton distributed a copy of the report that staff used Internally to provide Information to the City
Manager.
Chair liken stated there was consensus by the Commission and directed staff to remove the "Engineering CIP
Project Schedule' form the monthly agenda and place their internal repon at the back of the Safety Commission
packets for information only. The re,>on was not to be agendized.
11. Traffic Ardd.nt ~umm.1I'\' for lun.. 1995 . Distributed for Commissioner in;..>rmation.
~4- UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
/ J - -;/j;,
Safety Commission Minutes
Odober 12,1995
Page 2
Frank Rivera responded vehicles were subject to citation for parking on private property. The City had the
authorization of the property owners to cite vehicles. The City was in the process of obtaining permission from
the property owner to close the driveway with a gate, so that the lot could not be utilized, since it was private
property. He was unaware of any plans to develop the parcel since it was covered with sewer easements, which
could not have anything built on them. There was a fence at the top of the slope that the Middle School needed
to consider closing to discourage the parents from utilizing the parking lot. There was a barrier installed at the
back of the pedestrian ramp, because vehicles were driving on the pedestrian ramp to access the dirt lot.
Chair liken asked if staff had any discussions with the School Distrid about closing off the back gate.
Frank Rivera said the item was discussed without resolution. It was hoped that by providing parking on Hilitop
Drive, it would reduce the need for the parents to park in the vacant lot.
Commissioner Smith asked if Chula Vista Transit had any input to the change, because the parking was next to
a CVT bus stop.
Frank Rivera responded staff did not feel it would be a problem. Staff would keep an eye on the situation to make
sure no new probiems were created.
Commissioner Smith said the report was primarily based around the arrival and dismissal times of Hilltop Middle
School, but felt the parking would be a good addition to the church and park parking lots.
MSUC (Liken/Acton) to recommend that: 1) parking be added to the east side of Hilltop Drive between I Street
and Telegraph Canyon Road; 2) defer the request for left-turn phasing until the 1996-97 Capital Improvement
Program was submitted to Council; and 3) staff write a letter to Hilltop Middle School requesting that the gate
be closed at the top of the vacant lot near Telegraph Canyon Road.
6. REPORT on Request for an All-Way Stop at Terra Nova Drive & Beacon Place
Frank Rivera presented staff's report.
Leslie Woldt, 4176 Arden Way, San Diego, CA 92105, spoke on behalf of the C1earview Elementary School
Principal who was out of town. The primary interest was the safety of the children attending the school. The
report indicated that students were not bussed to the schooi, but driven by parents. If that were the case, there
would not be as much concern. Students also walked to school. Traffic had increased and she felt it was 'just
the tip of the iceberg.' Motorists had discovered the short cut between Otay lakes Road and East H Street and
used Terra Nova Drive to access East H Street. Vehicles travelled rapidly on Terra Nova Drive and it was not safe
for children to cross the street. As the area continued to grow, more vehicles would be traveling the street. The
word of the short cut of Terra Nova Drive had spread rapidly. Although the pedestrian count was low, many of
the pedestrians were under the age of twelve.
The following speakers relinquished their time to Mrs. June Adams:
Stanley Adams, 501 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91910
James Yamate, 534 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Mrs. john Quinn, 4B4 Starwood Circle, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Barbara & Josephine Peralta, 522 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Wanda Dyson, 550 Dawn Court, Chula Vista, CA 91910
lacey Newsom, 550 Dawn Court, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Deborah Peeples Garsh, 510 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91910
UNOFFICIAL MIN~TES
. /';5
/
Safety Commission Minutes
October 12, 1995
Page 3
Chair Liken allowed Mrs. Adams a fifteen minute presentation.
June Adams, 507 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 97910, wanted to highlight portions of the report from the
residents point of view. She thanked the Commission for volunteering their time. It was the Commission that
kept safety decisions from just being a matter of points, warrants, and numbers and allowed citizens to become
part of the decision making process. She referenced the City All-Way Stop Policy #478-<l3 which allowed for a
waiver of warrants in certain conditions. The residential streets of Beacon Place and Dawn Court were separated
from child centered activities of Clearview Elementary School and Terra Nova Park by a collector street. A few
special circumstances were that Terra Nova Drive was on a steep incline and there was a sharp curve before the
intersections. The intersection was not visible for motorists traveling north on Terra Nova Drive. The streets of
Dawn Court and Beacon Place used to be part of the surrounding neighborhood, but that was no longer the case
due to the traffic on Terra Nova Drive. It was difficult for motorists and pedestrians to exit the area. There were
no sidewalks on the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive. It was not safe to cross the street to access the other part
of the neighborhood. It was the residents' understanding that Terra Nova Drive was originally built as a four-lane
access road to a junior high school that was no longer planned. Homes had been built instead. Terra Nova Drive
was now a residential street. it was being used by motorists from Rancho del Rey, Bonita Long Canyon, and other
areas as a short cut to the 1-805. There was open space in the area that was not going to be developed. Motorists
traveled along Terra Nova Drive near the open space area and then the street came into a residential area. The
peak traffiC times listed in staff's report were also the times when the children were traveling to and from school.
Traffic was going to increase as Rancho del Rey developed and as more motorists discovered the short cut.
However, it would not help the intersection on points, because of the cross traffic ratio. She recommended that
two all-way stops be installed at both Hidden Vista Drive and Terra Nova Drive and Beacon PlaceNVestview
Drive and Terra Nova Drive. It didn't matter to residents if they crossed at Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place.
The numbers more supported Hidden Vista Drive for an all-way stop, but there were no sidewalks on the east
curbline of Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop at Beacon PlaceNVestview Drive would support pedestrian traffic
and an all-way stop at Hidden Vista would support vehicular traffic. Even though it was a short distance, it had
been done previously. If motorists were inconvenienced by two stop signs, they could use Del Rey Boulevard
to access East H Street. The designed route was Rancho del Rey Parkway to Del Rey Boulevard. She summarized
the issues of pedestrians and vehicles safely crossing the street, the steep hill on Terra Nova Drive, and how
accidents should be prevented before they occurred. She reviewed drawbacks on the installation of stop signs,
primarily noise and pollution and said the residents affected still wanted the stop sign. Another drawback listed
in the report was that it would cause delays to motorists. If motorists did not want to be delayed, they should take
the intended route to East H Street via Rancho del Rey Parkway. She showed slides she had taken of the area
including neighborhood children.
Jeannine Pudwill, 574 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91970, was concerned about the safety of the children and
spoke in favor of a stop sign.
Dr. Ida L. Spector, 506 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 97910, had a daughter that attended C1earview Elementary
School. She had been broadsided at Beacon Place and Terra Nova Drive. The speed of the accident could have
resulted in a fatality or hospitalization. Before the re-striping oITerra Nova Drive, she had to inch out on to Terra
Nova Drive and was nearly struck by a s~mi-truck. There were days when she was unable to take her daughter
to school and would have to leave the task to someone else. She did not want to cross the street herself. Her
daughter received a motorized car as a present and she would not allow her to drive it across Terra Nova Drive.
Her husband carried her daughter and the car across the street. She did not allow her daughter to ride her bicycle
across the street either. If a junior high school had been built as planned, motorists would not travel as fast
through the area. The developers had changed their minds on what to build and residents should not have to pay
for the changes.
Tim Pudwill, 514 Beacon Place, Chula Vista, CA 91970, had many concerns about how his sons would grow
up. His concerns were now more immediate in that he wondered if they would be able to cross .oe street safely.
His aide, son would be starting kinderga~en in 1996, and he was concerned for his safety. :{egardless of the
~
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
/ )-.y ~
Safety Commission Minutes
October 12, 1995
Page 4
numbers in staff's report, with the combination of the steep hill and sharp curve, it posed a dangerous situation.
He also felt it was going to get worse as more people discovered that Terra Nova Drive was an easier way to get
101-B05. He urged the Commission to vote for an all-way stop and crosswalk at the intersection.
Srun! Henderson, 583 Parkside Drive, Chula Vista, CA 97970, was a member of the Site Council for C1earview
Elementary School. He felt all the residents were saying that development between Beacon Place and Otay Lakes
Road was just getting started. It took six minutes for him to take his child to a school on Otay lakes Road via
Terra Nova Drive, and previously when he went to Southwestern College, it took him fifteen minutes from his
residence when he went on East H Street. The area of Terra Nova Drive near the open space was a wide portion
of roadway where motorists tended to speed. In a short time, he felt, the residents of Beacon Place would not
be able to exit their street to access Terra Nova Drive. Motorists crested the hill at 50 mph. Motorists did not
belong on Terra Nova Drive, but on Rancho del Rey Parkway, to access East H Street. With the addition of new
subdivisions, traffic counts would increase and more cars would short cut. As the numbers went up, accidents
would occur. He was aware of an accident that was not listed in the report, possibly because the Police
Department was not called. A vehicle crashed Into a wall at Hidden Vista Drive and Terra Nova Drive.
Joseph Canchola, 429 Hidden Vista Drive, Chula Vista, CA 97970, had lived in the neighborhood for six years
and lived one block away from the intersection of Hidden Vista Drive and Terra Nova Drive. Terra Nova Park
drew alat of citizens, including juveniles, and in many cases, unaccompanied children between six to ten years
old. Terra Nova Drive had increased traffic on Hidden Vista Drive. The majority of the people on Hidden Vista
Drive ignored the stops signs in the area. Instead of an all-way stop, he suggested a traffic signal at the
intersection of Hidden Vista Drive and Terra Nova Drive because stop sign.s were ignored. Waiting for an
accident to happen before something was done was poor planning. He consistently called the Police
Department regarding speeding in the area. He urged the Commission to recognize the situation as a serious
problem, and not just a point situation.
The Commission viewed staff's slides of the area.
Vice-Chair Miller had visited the area. She noticed that vehicles were traveling at such speed that when making
lurns, vehicles crossed the double yellow lines. She appreciated the residents attendance at the meeting. She
agreed with the residents, that either there needed to be two stop signs in both areas, or the City would have to'
install a sidewalk along the east curbline of Terra Nova Drive to allow residents to cross at Hidden Vista Drive.
If she lived In the area, she would not cross Terra Nova Drive, as she felt it was dangerous. The hill made the
area dangerous. She appreciated the re-striping the City had done, but felt motorists ignored or went around
striping. The speed of traffic at 45-55 mph traveling south on Terra Nova Drive was excessive.
Commissioner Acton agreed that traffic signs were ignored and the speeds were excessive. She felt something
needed to be done to slow motorists slow down or make them stop.
Commissioner Bierd said the Commission had been studying a speed hump policy and asked if Terra Nova Drive
would qualify for such a measure.
Frank Rivera said Terra Nova Drive would not qualify for speed humps for several reasons. The first reason was
the grade of the street. Streets with speed humps were level. Terra Nova Drive was also too wide. Speed humps
were installed on residential streets and not collector streets.
Commissioner Smith asked if crossing guards would be placed by Clearview School on Terra Nova Drive.
Vice-Chair Miller said crossing guards would not be placed on Terra Nova Drive because it was too far away from
the school.
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
31
// /
/.
Safety Commission Minutes
October' 2, 1995
Page 5
Commissioner Smith said the area also dealt with a planning issue and that staff might want to look at ways to
reduce the short cuts through the area by making it more inconvenient. He did not agree with pulting stops signs
at both locations. Crosswalks represented safety to a child. On a street with speeds of 40-S0 mph, a child might
think a painted crosswalk would protect them. Stop signs would slow traffic down. He worried about crosswalks
being false safety of security.
Vice-Chair Miller did not believe that a majority of motorists were going to Clearview School based on her
observation. Most vehicles were taking the short cut down to East H Street. She agreed with Commissioner Smith
and did not want to give a false sense of security to students. Parents would not allow six and seven year old
children to cross Terra Nova Drive by themselves. Parents were looking at the stop as a way for the parents to
walk their children to school rather than drive.
Commissioner Smith suggested bolts dOllS or pavement legends to help slow speed down and felt there were
several issues that needed to be looked at.
Commissioner Cochrane congratulated the residents on their presentation. He cautioned that stop signs were not
a cure all for problems. There was an implied sense of safety that pedestrians would be invulnerable to harm.
There still needed to be a sense of caution.
Commissioner Hoke said she observed that the exit from Beacon Place to southbound Terra Nova Drive did not
have good visibility. She had concerns as a motorist and felt an all-way stop would be warranted for both
pedestrians and motorists. There would be more traffic and something needed to be installed for the residents
of Beacon Place. She was unsure about a stop sign at Hidden Vista Drive. She would support an all-way stop
at Terra Nova Drive and Westview Drive/Beacon Place.
Hal Rosenberg commented that Terra Nova Drive was planned as a collector street in the City's General Plan.
It was deSigned to collect traffic from neighborhoods and distribute them to a major street. Short culling needed
to be defined. Residents could select different routes out of the community, and he did not consider that short
culling. He was not convinced that short culling from Otay Lakes Road to East H Street was occurring in a
significant way. However, when staff analyzed the development of Rancho del Rey, the amount of traffic was
estimated at 4,000 vehicles. Staff felt the street was initially over designed. Terra Nova Drive was built and
striped for four lanes. When Mrs. Adams initially came to staff, staff re-striped Terra Nova Drive to two lanes.
Studies showed adequate sight distance and staff did not feel the intersection was dangerous. Staff felt the
intersection could be negotiated safety with due care. The same situation occurred throughout the City.
Commissioner Acton asked about stop signs on a trial basis.
Hal Rosenberg said staff was not recommending a stop sign, but it was an available option.
Chair liken stated that history had shown that once a stop sign was installed, it was not removed. He commented
that Traffic Engineering desired orderly flow on the open road. Staff and Council had determined, and it had been
proven, that stop signs were not a speed deterrent. The only area where vehicles slowed was directly in the area
of the stop sign. Within one half of a block, vehicles were back up to speed. Stops signs were not very effective
in slowing down traffic. The median speed was 40.56 on Terra Nova Drive. The 85th percentile speed was
47.46 which indicated that 85% of motorists were traveling at or below that speed, and legislators had defind that
as a reasonable and prudent speed at which motorists were driving. The design speed of the road was 36 mph,
which indicated speeds were 10 mph over design speed. The all-way stop policy indicated that the 30 point
minimum warrants could be waived if other restrictive controls had not corrected a documented problem. He
felt a documented problem was the speed, but didn't feel a stop sign was the corrective measllre for speed. He
asked staff what they felt would be the next corrective measure, other than a stop sign, to slow speeds down.
U~OlFICIAL MINUTES
/:5 // t-~-
Safety Commission Minutes
October 12, 1995
Page 6
Hal Rosenberg said when motorists were driving Terra Nova Drive in an open area with nothing to impede their
movement, speeds would be higher. He did not have a solution and said there was a tendency to over control
intersections with restrictions.
Chair Liken asked if it would be possible to move traffic more to the center of the roadway with striping and post
arrow signs indicating the curve to attempt to slow traffic down to the design speed. He desired to follow the
warrants as much as possible as Council directed. He hoped to find an alternative to funneling traffic in order
to slow speeds down. Maybe it would be enough of a deterant for traffic to use the major streets of Rancho del
Rey Parkway and East H Street.
Hal Rosenberg said he would have to give that some thought. As someone mentioned, striping could be ignored.
It would be an expensive measure to reconstruct a roadway. If curbs were brought in, it would affect traffic.
MS: (Smith/Acton) to ask staff to provide the Commission, at the next meeting, with a report recommending
the combination of an all-way stop sign and other speed reduction factors, not limited to bolts dolts and
painting.
Vice-Chair Miller questioned if the motion meant the installation of an all-way stop and next month bring back
additional speed control measures.
Commissioner Smith responded yes.
Frank Rivera said his understanding was that the item be continued until next month when the all-way stop would
be considered with other measures.
Chair Liken said that was his understanding as well.
Commissioner Cochrane said he had no faith in re-striping. It would not stop anyone who was intent on
speeding. He felt the Commission needed to make a decision at the meeting, and to at least determine the need
for an all-way stop. He didn't believe any further studies would come up with a satisfactory conclusion.
Vice-Chair Miller agreed with Commissioner Cochrane. If the Commission deferred the item, residents would
need to return and address the issue again. She heard the other Commissioners saying they wanted an all-way
stop. Maybe the area would need to be revisited as volumes on Terra Nova Drive increased.
SUBSTITUTE MOTION (Liken/Acton): to install an all-way stop at Terra Nova Drive and Beacon Place!
Westview Drive as aTrial Traffic Regulation and a report back to the Commission in three to fou~ months
after the installation of the stop signs which addressed speed concerns. Approve unanimously.
7. REPORT on Safety Concerns in the 400 Block of Nickman Street
Staff explained that the notifications for the item were mailed on Friday, October 6, 1995; however, many
residents did not receive the notification until Wednesday, October 11 or Thursday, October 12. Therefore, staff
recommended that the item be tabled until the November 1995 meeting.
Chair Liken asked the requestor of the item, Mr. Rice, if he was in concurrence with the recommendation.
Mr. Rice agreed and the item was tabled.
8. REPORT on Reaffirming Speed Hump Policy
~
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
///
, /
, .
C -// /- /
(') / ./ ,- .....:/ ..
~
;..= - ..
,
ceCCCCCCCCCOOOOOOOO~OQO~J~.e
o.ccceeCCCOOOOOOOO.OOOOOJJ..
cocccoecccoooooooo~oaoooJJ.e
_.ccc-.c-cnnnnGG--GGQ~nnn~n.-
... " ' ...,/J14)~ f.>+-v';)J~ ,s,..... 0l~'1...',"&~11? "'\.t?'p~..J""1 ..'1 .
00 C C C C . C C ~ !.It. S~~V/' _q""p"~> ''''''1-+ '4 S,",'044'cI pr.'''-''I >,Tl ..,..,,,
a.eee..cc. 7f'l" 'V"'V V ~ ~ d'O~
coceeoecc( ~ .
oeC{;CCCGGI /J
. GZ.. -y'!:.-;r:? 1 ?-y;:Y' ~-r Yfl'77
~~~~/Ib . ? ~ . /-.
~# 1'7'.~/~ 1;r:TY -V'VY ?-- 07 J:-'~/1'J
/-7.p ~~ 9~ . ?-.'YYV,.7T'I
.?'v ~/YU-v 7 ? r".;- (' ,r 0 . ./'
--..z.?-G>/Y C:>V1-2'"'/"> 1f'~<:?~...-c7 c:;{'o/O'
( 1--' v
'.:? ~ ';z:-....r;?Zf'l/ uA'rvl /'7.-9d';#~rr;Y
.r2.. ~7 J7"'v-rv~'7n7
-'--?1b~;?o&?TJ 7 t/ .
.~~. ~~'7
?V"?? ~~/7 /-<-;;,;>.;'":;' L/
~.- ._. r ~.. -_.- -..- ..
I
cecccecccc
Ol.ccce.CCI
cocGC<gecoc
"..ece..eol
oocccoecc-c
01. ceo e,. C 0 I
c.cec<aeccc
O.Cc.OCi(;.GQt
;
-t)L0f m~ ~ /~chv'
~~;;z;-r,.er1 ?n-7?-i::>-t5I~~ 4
~r~ ~ ~ !'l--crf7
1~1!:
.--' j./6 "ti4
PET I T ION
kECf~~:>>
cn'( or CHUl..L 'VIi'"
fNGIr/EEIiING 3t"
95 SEt 2t .. 12: U
5"
We, the undersigned, as residents of the Terra Nova neighborhood
within the city of Chula Vista, request that an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive either at the inter-
section of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. We make this
request so that children walking to the local elementary school,
to bus stops for the junior and senior high schools, and to the
neighborhood park are provided a safe crossing to these facil-
ities. The traffic volume on Terra Nova Drive is steadily
increasing as new homes are built in the Rancho Del Rey Develop-
ment. vehicles often travel at high speeds and visibility in
both directions is impaired by the steep, curving incline of
Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop and crosswalk would enable
children to carefully cross this connector road without
needlessly jeopardizing their lives.
RINTED NAME
ADDRESS
IGNATURE
g ()-::.6
ut2-~
-
1
tl/__=
~ d CA S'{' ~t'~ It. -
f!flfJ/'f' /170. /co/m
.O/lv /0 M/l ~ cot-;
C.hR~~.c<:2.()~
,
,
J<~berrQ.... "Bla <: KwoDJ
furry 1dlac~LUDr)d
_~oYJo\wlo C~ M.~ 511'-
~1J}w'f DC tr6f. ~
7 ~D 'fA-JIH2i>~ ~
M(.\~iJ.{t;,l.Q U))1)1
4E
4f/~
------------.-:..- -
(j
./1
~ /
PET I T I 0 !I
We, the undersigned, as residents of the Terra Nova neighborhood
within the city of Chula Vista, request that an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive either at the inter-
section of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. We make this
request so that children walking to the local elementary school,
to bus stops for the junior and senior high schools, and to the
neighborhood park are provided a safe crossing to these facil-
ities. The traffic volume on Terra Nova Drive is steadily
increasing as new homes are built in the Rancho Del Rey Develop-
ment. Vehicles often travel at high speeds and visibility in
both directions is impaired by the steep, curving incline of
Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop and crosswalk would enable
children to carefully cross this connector road without
needlessly jeopardizing their lives.
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
L.
, ...
~i.-~'L'
~-
/ .~:) -") (>
"'-
~
PET I T ION
We, the undersigned, as residents of the Terra Nova neighborhood
within the city of Chulh Vista, request that an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive either at the inter-
section of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. We make this
request so that children walking to the local elementary school,
to bus stops for the junior and senior high schools, and to the
neighborhood park are provided a safe crossing to these facil-
ities. The traffic volume on Terra Nova Drive is steadily
increasing as new home~ are built in the Rancho Del ReyDevelop-
ment. vehicles often travel at high speeds and visibility in
both directions is impaired by the steep, curving incline of
Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop and crosswalk would enable
children to carefully cross this connector road without
needlessly jeopardizing their lives.
PRINTED NAME
.4cln~il1 f:~-f),
/o/4bc EYJ<
--2~~5
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
./7
.
~
p,lIC /JZJ,4,n~
~
L;."c-~ #;:40.4
c..--
4 ~ Q.,.
~ ~ .-....,/./ z;~
f -L7J/i~ ~'t:J S
<':1 ~ ~ -& ~~J..
Co..ro I LDo.. ~I G ue rveVc)
43-- / '
.... .
.~
,/
/;/
PET I T ION
We, the undersigned, as residents of the Terra Nova neighborhood
within the city of Chula Vista, request that an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive either at the inter-
section of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. We make this
request so that children walking to the local elementary school,
to bus stops for the junior and senior high schools, and to the
neighborhood park are provided a safe crossing to these facil-
ities. The traffic volume on Terra Nova Drive is steadily
increasing as new homes are built in the Rancho Del Rey Develop-
ment. Vehicles often travel at high speeds and visibility in
both directions is impaired by the steep, curving incline of
Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop and crosswalk would enable
children to carefully cross this connector road without
needlessly jeopardizing their lives.
PRINTED NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
/lft/I/,), :f Newson.
~CUY) r.Jb.~ Yr1n C
1-/~j Q SI- je (
St.tpt\..~ 10.. (ObS
& v" '" WlV1/ (0/ n....
Gl'lvf.'{ -.ft(61 (
Illm/.F1E S-
f
\f}RA ~AfVC~<2
~c.v--hkr" ~~~~
n~Q~v\L- E . f~\QJ)Cft1
#-
~ P1f?5
/J <:'5~
PET I T 10M
We, the undersigned, as resident~ of the Terra Mova neighborhood
within the city of Chula Vista, request that an all-way stop and
crosswalk be installed on Terra Nova Drive either at the inter-
section of Hidden Vista Drive or Beacon Place. We make this
request so that children walking to the local elementary school,
to bus stops for the junior and senior high Bchools, and to the
neighborhood park are provided a safe crossing to these facil-
ities. The traffic volume on TErra Nova Drive is steadily
increasing as new homes are built in the Rancho Del Rey Develop-
ment. vehicles often travel at high speeds and yisibility in
both directions is impaired by the steep, curving incline of
Terra Nova Drive. An all-way stop and crosswalk would enable
children to carefully cross this connector road without
needlessly jeopardizing their lives.
PRINTED NAME
ADDRESS
SIGNATURE
TiM~JOWIu.. ?
~~...?~~~
~~ ~('~.tlR?~
~~tra
,~ /~I
-f--.,,> ,~
(.
~ F!!cr
~. ""'. 1<1" efC6%-
L..-.
-..
-
r;J~t!./i/?
('7 V~~.
a ~ ~ ~ 'I p....; p~ tzlt.l
..:JM155 .e N$ Rb j e-
~.v.
vf.Il; ./I'/;?f'
4<
~
Lf,li
4S
C/
;/
~
,/ .'
//
/)
SPEED LIMIT -- ENGINEERING/TRAFFIC SURVEY:
STREET:
LIMITS:
Terra Nova Drive
East H Street - Rancho Del Rev Parkwav
EXisting Posted Speed Limit:
35
HPH
SUMMARY OF SPEED SURVEYS
Sepent:
Date Taken:
Number Veblcle. on Sample:
85th Percentile Speed:
Bange of Speeds Recorded:
Block , :
ROADWAY CHARACTERISTICS
East H Street - Beacon Pl.
6 2/93
*713(NB) *252(SB)
39 HPH
o - 45+ HPH
500 - 600 block
*Data obtained vith traffic
Beacon P -
7/18/95
~o
62 MPH
2-; _ 'iO
500 blocks
countalS.
Width 55 - 67
Horizontal Alignment
Vertical Alignment
feet Number of lanes for both dlrectlons
bin. - 450'
1% to 5% over 250' V.C. (desiRn sneed - 36 HPH)
2 - 4
TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS
Average Daily Traffic 890
On-Street Parking No narki~p Al'nwprl ~Y~-8t nn u.~~ .iA. nf .~~..~ ~.~UA.~
Paseo Del Cid to Mon'era Ct. (approx. 9 0').
Special Conditions Bike lanes on both sides of roadways. Ad1acent land use is
residential. No direct driveway access.
Accident History Terra Nova n/o Bea~on Pl. ~Dened for Dubli~ URe on 6/1/Q~.
No accidents reDorted. No reDorted a~cident history Ale BeA~nn Pl.
SURVEY RESULTS
Study vas Prepared by
Leonardo Hernandez
Date
7/25/95
)lecOllllDendatlon
Retain 35 HPH speed limit due to vertical aliRnment desiRn sneed.
':;::~':':-:;Fe:~h J
4{,
Date
By
Approved speed limit:
35 MPH
Per evc 40803. Survey EXpires:
6/2/98
_.//./ .
-j '/
~
-i..J
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SPEED COUNT SUMMARY
FOR
TERRA NOVA DRIVE
NEAR
BEACON PLACE
LOCATION: TERRA NOVA DRIVE E/O BEACON PLACE
DATE DIRECTION AnT AVERAGE MEDIAN 85TH % MODE 10 MPH PACE % PACE
(MPH) (MPH) (MPH) (MPH) (MPH)
9/26/95 WE 920 41. 20 40.56 47.46 33.00 33-43 76.52
9/27/95 EB 829 39.97 40.38 45.68 45.00 35-45 85.40
9/28/95 WB 929 40.93 42.20 45.96 45.00 35-45 86.86
9/26/95 EB 841 41.31 40.68 47.34 43.00 33-43 76.09
9/28/95 EB 801 40.28 40.68 45.86 45.00 35-45 86.14
LOCATION: TERRA NOVA DRIVE S/O HIDDEN VISTA DRIVE
DATE DIRECTION AnT AVERAGE MEDIAN 85TH MODE 10 MPH PACE % PACE
(MPH) (MPH) (MPH) (MPH) (MPH)
9/26/95 NB 853 36.49 34.96 39.88 33.00 33-43 96.24
9/27/95 NB 839 34.55 34.58 40.06 31.00 29-39 73.53
9/28/95 NB 809 34.81 35.32 40.08 35.00 29-39 74.78
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 16
Meeting Date 1/16/96
REPORT
DENIAL OF REQUEST BY ELITE RACING FOR
REIMBURSEMENT FOR A BICYCLING EVENT "TOUR DE
SOUTH COUNTY" HELD ON JULY 16, 1995
This item has been pulled from the agenda.
/~-/
I
\
BUDGET PRESENTATIONS FOR
JANUARY 16, 1996
MANAGEMENT SERVICES
BUILDING & HOUSING
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
! ~/ /
" /'1'
".
Management and Information Services
Statement of Purpose
The Management and Information Services Department
develops, implements, operates and maintains computer
~\
systems (both hardware and software) in order to support
and improve the operational efficiency and effectiveness of
City departments.
L-_
Management and Information Services
"
Primary Goals:
Provide quality data processing services to the City of
Chula Vista in mainframe, local area network,
microcomputers, telephones and voice processing in
order to support City departments.
Enhance the revenue of the City by providing quality
mainframe data processing services to other Municipalities.
FY 1995-96 Budget
$796,580
Number of Employees
10.6
Full Time Employees
10.0
Part Time Employees
.6
,
i '. I
,
:
.~
-
DIRECTOR
Management & Information
Services Department
Administrative
Office Assistant III
I I
Systems & Programming Computer Operations
Division Manager
I I I I I
Microcomputer Compu ter Computer Computer Ma i nframe I nforma t ion Data Entry
Specialist Programmerf Prograllll1er/ Programmer Computer Sys tems Operator
Ana lys t Analyst Operator Technician
". .
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MANAGEMENT & INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
(619) 691-5001
Computer Operations
Statement of Purpose
Computer Operations is responsible for the processing of
all mainframe computer systems for Chula Vista, EI Cajon,
Imperial Beach, Coronado and Lemon Grove, maintenance
and programming of the City's telephone switch and
maintenance and programming of the City's voice
processing system,
"
Sample Goals
Maintain the effectiveness and efficiency ofthe mainframe.
Maintain the effectiveness and efficiency of the telephone
switch and the voice mail system.
Complete all computer processing in a timely manner.
Sample Output Measures
Mainframe availability
Telephone and voice processing system availability
Number of online transactions per year
Number of data entry documents processed per year
Number of voice mail messages processed per year
,. "
/
Programming
I,
Statement of Purpose
"
Computer programming is responsible for designing,
developing and maintaining all mainframe computer
application programs for Chula Vista, EI Cajon, Imperial
Beach, Coronado and Lemon Grove.
Sample Goals
Maintain and supprt all mainframe computer applications
at peak efficiency according to the unique needs of each
user.
Make all programming changes requested by the user in
a timely manner.
Sample Output Measures
Percentage of critical program modifications completed
on time.
Number of programming requests completed.
'/
Microcomputers
Statement of Purpose
.'
The microcomputer specialist is responsible for
administering the City's local area networks, assisting all
City departments with microcomputer maintenance and
support and for providing guidance to departments
concerning automation.
Sample Goals
Ensure that all City local area networks are operating
efficiently and effectively.
Respond to and resolve microcomputer trouble calls in a
timely manner.
Install hardware and software ir. a timely manner.
Explore applicability of new technology to City applications.
Sample Output Measures
Availability of local area networks
Number of microcomputer support requests resolved
Number of microcomputers supported
Number of microcomputer products maintained on the
local area network
Management and Information Services
List of Applications
"
Police and Fire Dispatching
Payroll
Automated Accounting
Parking Citations
Automated Building Permit Tracking
Personnel Applicant Tracking
Budget
Business License
Tax Assessor Information
Electronic Mail
Calondaring
GIS
, /.1;
Management and Information Services
Recent Accomplishments
"
Generation of over $100,000 annually from providing services
to EI Cajon, Coronado, Imperial Beach and Lemon Grove.
Upgrade to more reliable version of voice processing system.
Internet Home Page on the World Wide Web.
Pay telephones at bus stops
New budget system
Installation of sewer billing system
Connection of outlying Fire stations to the City wide LAN for
CFIRS reporting.
Connection of outlying Recreation Centers to the City wide
LAN.
Management and Information Services
Recent Accomplishments
"
Installation of new Cash register system in the Finance
Department and interface to the mainframe.
Installation of a Local Area Network at the BETRC facility,
Reasearch into a new Police computer aided dispatch system
Research and selection of an Optical records management
system for the City Clerk's office.
Research into a new Financial system for the Finance
Department.
SmartCommunity Project.
, ' /
Management and Information Services
Major Issues
"
Change!
Nowhere else in society has change been greater or
happens as quickly as in technology, Computers are
getting smaller, faster and more powerful. Connectivity
is becoming more difficult, not easier and we need to be
able to understand the pros and cons of each new piece
of technology and how the City of Chula Vista can
benefit. Issues such as how Chula Vista can best utilize
the Information Superhighway need to be addressed
and are being addressed through projects such as
SmartCommunity,
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND HOUSING
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The Department of Building and Housing protects the
members of our community by ensuring that all the
'\
buildings that we live and work in are properly constructed
and maintained. The Department is also responsible for
maintaining the Citywide communications systems.
BUILDING AND HOUSING
GENERAL STATISTICS
BUDGET
FY 1995-96 General Fund Budget:
Number of Employees:
$1,275,970
21.21 FIE
ORGANIZATION
Administration
Permits
Inspections
Communications
Americans with Disabilities Act
BOARD SUPPORT
Board of Appeals and Advisors
Access Appeals Board
Human Relations Commission
CONSTRUCTION VALUATION
FY 1994-95:
FY 1995-96 (YTD):
$188,247,109
$ 66,437,453
# OF CODE ENFORCEMENT COMPLAINTS RECEIVED
FY 1994-95:
FY 1995-96 (YTD):
1,595
624
# OF INSPECTIONS PERFORMED
FY 1994-95:
FY 1995-96 (YTD):
29,024
13,802
DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND HOUSING
'-
ADMINISTRA TION
I
I I I I
AMERICANS WITH
PERMITS INSPECTIONS COMMUNICA TIONS DISABILITIES ACT
I I I I
PLAN PERMIT EQUIPMENT C.LP.
REVIEW INSPECTIONS MAINTENANCE COORDINATION
I I I I
PERMIT CODE ENFORCEMENT/ NEW EQUIPMENT CITY-WIDE
ISSUANCE NUISANCE ABATEMENT INST ALLA TION TECHNICAL ADvrSE
I I
RECORDS HOUSING
RETENTION INSPECTIONS
PLAN REVIEW/PERMIT ISSUANCE
Statement of Purpose
This Section ensures quality construction by confirming buildings
will be designed to provide safety and comfort for the users over
the life of the buildings.
Sample Goals
*
Review projects for compliance with aU adopted State and
City life safety standards
*
Ensure aU individuals obtaining permits are qualified in
accordance with local and State requirements
*
De'~rmine and verify coUection of building permit fees used
to offset cost of providing Department services
*
Maintain and make available for public viewing aU
construction permit related property records
Sample Output Measures
*
Normal Plan Check Turnaround Times
. Small Room Additions - 1 working day
. New Residential Buildings - 10 working days
. New Commercial Buildings - 14 working days
*
Total Number of Permits Issued
*
Total Permit Valuation
*
Average Number of Public Counter Contacts
!/
BUILDING INSPECfIONS
Statement of Purpose
Field staff conducts periodic inspections of each project to confirm
construction is in accordance with approved plans.
Sample Goals
*
Verify construction meets minimum fire and life safety
standards contained in State mandated Building, Electrical,
Mechanical and Plumbing construction codes
*
Create and maintain legal records for the various
construction phases of each project
*
Maintain readiness to respond to perform structural damage
assessments in the event of a natural disaster
Sample Output Measures
*
Number of Inspections Performed
*
Percentage of Inspections Performed Within 24 Hours
*
Number of Inspections Per Inspector Per Day
,/
CODE ENFORCEMENT/NUISANCE ABATEMENT
Statement of Purpose
To preserve community appearance and property values by
enforcing compliance with City adopted zoning and property
standard regulations.
Sample Goals
*
Communicate property standard requirements to property
owners and complainants through field inspection and/or
correspondence
*
To take aggressive enforcement action to eliminate
potentially hazardous conditions impacting individual
properties or neighborhoods
*
To investigate complaints of illegal construction activity and
initiate resolution of deficiencies through securing of permits
Sample Output Measures
*
Number of Code Enforcement Complaints Received
. Signs
. Vehicles
. Graffiti
. Sanitation
. Business
. Housing
. Miscellaneous
*
Percentage of Complaints Resolved
. Within 30 Days
. Within 60 Days
. Within 180 Days
- , I / /'
! i/,j-- /
HOUSING INSPECfIONS
Statement of Purpose
To preserve the quality of existing housing units Citywide by
enforcing minimum health and safety standards.
Sample Goals
*
Conduct housing inspections of all apartment complexes to
confirm habitable conditions
*
Conduct periodic inspections of all mobilehome park
facilities to confirm compliance with State mandated
minimum health and safety requirements
*
Respond to complaints of substandard housing and resolve
deficiencies (ex: lack of hot & cold running water,
inadequate bathroom facilities, lack of electrical lighting,
inadequate heating facilities and deterioration of structural
floors & ceilings)
Sample Output Measures
*
Number of Inspections of Residential Apartment Units
Annually (18,000+ Citywide)
*
Number of Inspections of Mobilehome Parks Annually (31
Parks/3,SOO spaces Citywide)
*
Percentage of Violations Closed
. Within 30 Days
. Within 60 Days
. Within 180 Days
. </1
COMMUNICATIONS
Statement of Purpose
The Communications Division is responsible for maintaining the
communications systems utilized by Police, Fire and all other City
departments.
Sample Goals
*
Be available to provide immediate response for repairs to
Police and Fire emergency communications equipment 24
hours per day
*
Provide support for repair of non-emergency equipment
utilized Citywide
*
Provide emergency services and maintenance assistance to
Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District for fire dispatch
emergency communications systems and equipment
*
Ensure future communications equipment and services meet
minimum standards of quality and maintainability
Sample Output Measures
*
Average Response Time to Repair
. Emergency Police Department Equipment
. Emergency Fire Department Equipment
. General Citywide Non-Emergency Equipment
*
Number of Service Hours for O'ltside Contracts
*
Number of Service Hours for Overtime Emergency
Responses
'/
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM
Statement of Purpose
The section is responsible for implementing physical changes to
various City-owned facilities in order to ensure the facilities are
accessible to persons with disabilities.
Sample Goals
*
Manage ADA Implementation Capital Improvement Program
*
Investigate and resolve complaints of inaccessibility of City
facilities
*
Provide technical assistance to other departments on
appropriate application of ADA regulations
Sample Output Mea~ures
*
Number of Facilities Brought into Full Compliance with ADA
within CIP Budget
*
Number of Valid Accessibility Complaints Received and Time
Frames for Resolution
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS
*
Consolidation of Code Enforcement and Inspection Divisions
in order to overcome 36% reduction in field staff during last
three years
*
Cross-training of inspection staff to perform both code
enforcement and new construction inspection duties
*
Training of all plan review and inspection staff on
application of entirely reformatted Model Codes
*
Substantial strides in implementing new phase of ADA
Compliance Program
*
Initiation of mail-out customer service satisfaction survey
forms
*
Implementation of streamlining suggestions received from
survey forms (ex: reduced processing steps and permits by
fax)
*
Streamlined Code Enforcement complaint handling through
higher use of correspondence in lieu of repeated field visits
*
Staff served as instructors on application of new code
requirements during presentations to local designer groups
/ :
/
SERVICE LEVEL REDUCfION::i
*
Community Appearance Program (Suspended)
*
City-Wide Annual Clean Up Days Program (Suspended)
*
Enhanced Graffiti Eradication Program (Suspended)
*
Weekend Code Enforcement Program (Suspended)
*
Development of Code Enforcement Citation Program
(Delayed)
,..
.' /"
CHAllENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
In the coming year, the Department will be addressing the
following challenges:
*
Development of a program to utilize volunteers to assist in
the performance of basic code enforcement activities
*
Introducing enhancements to the permit processing system
that will make obtaining a permit less cumbersome and time
consuming
*
Expanding the role of automation in the permit issuance and
inspection process
,
/~ ,
'1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
We creatively plan and facilitate physical improvements, economic development and social
benefits which enhance the quality of life for all people in the Chula Vista community.
.
. ,
.
~."
.
To achieve our mission, we:
Create public/private partnerships to develop recreational, cultural, educational, and
social amenities
Develop, finance, and preserve affordable housing opportunities
Provide assistance to local, non-profit organizations who are working to meet diverse
community needs
. Promote a business environment conducive to generating local tax revenue, employment
opportunities, and a balanced community
. Revitalize blighted or underutilized areas of the City.
"- '
REDEVELOPMENT/SPECIAL PROJECTS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE
FY 1995-96
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
HOUSING/CDSG
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
SECA (GRANT FUNDED)
SESC (GRANT FUNDED)
ADMINISTRATIVE
SUPPORT STAFF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
BUDGET RESPONSIBILITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
$5,788,759
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
2,162,000
FEDERAL HOME PROGRAM
708,000
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION (BECAl 667,000
ANNUAL TOTAL
$9,325,759
~! /
, ,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
RESPONSIBILITY FOR COMMISSIONS,
COMMITTEES, AND ASSOCIA TIONS
Boards/Commissions
Mobilehome Rent Review Commission
Housing Advisory Commission
Economic Development Commission
f..ruject Area Committees
Town Centre
Otay Valley Road
Southwest
Other
Council Bayfront Subcommittee
Workforce Development Team
Castle Park Neighborhood Improvement Committee
CHIP Housing Rehabilitation Loan Committee
Chula Vista Downtown Association (liaison)
Broadway Business Association (liaison)
./
R
E
o
E
v
E
l
o
P
M
E
N
T
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Eliminate blight in 5 redevelopment project areas (Town Centre I,
Bayfront, Town Centre II, Otay Valley Road, and Southwest)
through the use of tax increment revenues and financing, eminent
domain, property assembly, and land write-down
SAMPLE OBJECTIVES
1. Work with Rohr and the Port District to develop a plan for
the redevelopment of Rohr properties south of H Street and
study the feasibility of extending H Street westerly to
Marina Parkway by December 1996 (BF)
2. Work with the Mid-Bayfront developer/owner to establish a
conceptual development plan (BF)
3. Work with the Sweetwater Union High School District
toward the development of Agency-owned property 12.4
acres) at Third and Alvarado as district headquarters for
the school district, by completing Disposition and
Development Agreement and site development plan (TCI)
4. Plan for the redevelopment of the existing City Corporation
Yard, with redevelopment plans and business points
prepared for Agency consideration (TCII)
5. Work with Scripps Hospital to expand hospital at Fifth
Avenue and H Street, with Phase I construction to
commence in July 1997 (TCII)
6. Expand Chula Vista Auto Park in existing Phase I and Phase
II expansion, to include development of two new
dealerships by December 1996 (OVR)
EXAMPLES OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES
. Increased property tax assessed valuation in project areas
. Increased sales tax generation in project areas
. Increased jobs in project areas
. Higher quality development, improved infrastructure, and
enhanced recreational amenities in project areas
RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Palomar Trolley Center---200,000 square foot retail center
Auto Park Phase I---three dealerships
Mervyn's in Chula Vista Shopping Center---80,000 square feet
Channels ide Shopping Center--- 194,000 square feet, including
Wal-Mart
Otay Valley Road widening, Phase 1---$4.3 million capital project
through assessment district
Broadway Business Homes
Courtney RV Service Center
/
ECONOMIC
D EVE LOP MEN T
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Promote job generation and a balanced local economy through
activities that accomplish business retention, expansion, and
outreach
SAMPLE OBJECTIVES
1. Implement the High-Tech/Bio-Tech Incentive Zone in the
EastLake Business Center, including finalization of
appropriate agreement Is) with EastLake, founding of the
Western Regional BioProcessing Center, and recruitment of
high-tech companies.
2. Implement the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance
(BECAl, including achieving 80% occupancy of the Border
Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC) and servicing of at
least 200 clients through the Border Environmental
Technology Resource Center (BETRC).
3. Develop new financial assistance tools, including a BECA
Microenterprise Loan Fund and a HUD Section 108 Loan
Guarantee Fund
HOUSING
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Actively maintain, improve and develop quality housing
opportunities throughout the city, incorporating the financial
resources of the Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate
Income Housing fund and the federal HOME program
SAMPLE OBJECTIVES
1. Obtain approval of Chula Vista as the site of the next
California Veterans Home, by securing final selection by
State siting committee, and by assisting in securing
funding of $32 million from state and federal sources
2. Assist non-profit developers in developing 24-to-30
affordable family rental units by June 1997
3. Develop a comprehensive First-time Homebuyers Program
by January 1997
EXAMPLES OF PERFORMANCE GOALS
. Increase in number of housing units affordable to low and
moderate income households, both rental and ownership
. Preservation of housing affordability for mobilehome
residents and subsidized rental unit residents
RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Chula Vista "priority site" for new Veterans Homen-$32 million
project
Adopted EastLake Affordable Housing Program to develop 380
affordable units
, ,/
Obtained control of 3 acres in Otay Ranch project for affordable
housing obligation of Telegraph Canyon Estates
Adopted Rancho Del Rey Spa III Affordable Housing Agreement for
40 affordable units
Formed Chula Vista Housing Authority
Assisted in preserving "At-Risk" Palomar Apartments (168 units) and
Oxford Terrace 1132 units)
Park Village Apartments---28 very low income family apartments
with child care and job training
Casa Nueva Vida---13-unit emergency shelter housing and 17-unit
transitional housing apartments
Trolley Terrace---acquired property for child care center for 80-100
low income children and 12-14 unit low income for-sale housing
units
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Administer the annual $2 million federal CDBG program to benefit
low and moderate income persons
SAMPLE OBJECTIVES
1. Provide approximately 15 % of the annual entitlement as
grants to a balanced and coordinated array of social service
organizations
2. Provide a substantial amount of funding to capital projects
which improve neighborhoods that are predominantly low
and moderate income
EXAMPLES OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES
. Timely delivery of federal grant funds to approved projects
. Minimal administrative exceptions identified by federal
monitoring process
RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Funded YMCA Aquatic Center---$500,OOO between CDBG and
PAD
South Bay Community Services Teen Club---facilitated lease and
provided funding
Otay Gymnasium---committed almost $1 million in funding
Neighborhood Revitalization Program---completed Otay Town and
began Castle Park
/
SPECIAL PROJECTS
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
Plan, process, negotiate, and facilitate large city-wide
development projects that offer significant public benefits from
revenue generation and job generation
SAMPLE OBJECTIVES
1. Pursue development of 250-room Bonita Grande Golf
Lodge, with Exclusive Negotiation Agreement provided to
Council by February 1996 and EIR completed by February
1997
2. Assist developer of proposed water park and MCA and
Otay Rio Business Park to move proposal forward for
Council consideration, with agreements and
recommendations coming forward to Council by December
1996
3. Manage the development and entitlement process for the
proprsed Family Recreation Facility in the Lower
Sweetwater Valley, if the proposed developer moves
forward with the project
EXAMPLES OF PERFORMANCE MEASURES
. Increase in quality and quantity of jobs in the City
. Increased property tax assessed valuation
. Increased sales tax generation
. Enhanced recreational and commercial opportunities
RECENT ACCOMPLISHMENTS
MCA Amphitheater---20,OOO seats
Ranch Del Rey Commercial Center---K-Mart, Home Depot,
Price Club, Bowling Alley, and satellite retail
'/
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STATISTICS
Miles of streets:
Lane miles of streets:
Value of streets:
316.12
765.42
$200 million
Miles of sewer main lines:
Value of sewer lines:
357. 17
$ 91 million
Number of street trees:
Number of park trees:
27,000
5,150
Number of fleet vehicles
or equipment maintained:
440
Number of intersections:
Number of traffic signals:
Number of traffic signs:
Number of street name signs:
7,509
135
18,200
14,730
Number of assessment districts:
Value of improvements funded
by districts:
15
$88 million
Square footage of buildings
maintained by Custodial Services:
349,400
Square footage of buildings
maintained by Construction/Repair:
430,000
Lineal feet of painted crosswalks:
Lineal feet of painted curbs:
Miles of street striping:
78,000
156,000
530.3
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FY1995-96 BUDGET
General Fund Budget:
Sewer Fund Budget:
Central Garage Budget:
Equipment Replacement:
Transit Fund Budget:
$10,867,100
$ 9,334,530
$ 1,371,430
$ 855,860
$ 3,958,340
Capital Improvement
Project Budget:
$11 ,485,160
ORGANIZA TION
Three Divisions - Engineering, Operations, Transit
Number of Employees:
Number of Full-Time Employees:
Number of Part-Time Employees:
161.48 FTE
157
9
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The purpose of the Public Works Department is to design, construct and
maintain the City's infrastructure, such as streets, sewer systems, drainage
facilities, sidewalks, traffic signals, street lights and street trees; maintain
City buildings and oversee their construction or renovation; manage the
public transit system; maintain the City vehicle fleet; maintain City base
maps; and ensure that all private developments meet engineering standards
and conform to all State laws and Municipal codes.
ENGINEERING
ADMINISTRATION
ADV ANCED PLANNING/
SEWERS
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION/
SUR VEYING
DESIGN
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION
SYSTEMS
LAND DEVELOPMENT
OTA Y RANCH ENGINEERING
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
PUBLIC WORKS D}';PARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS
DIRECTOR
OPERA nONS
ADMINISTRA TION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
RIJlLDING CIP
PROJECT SUPERVISION
CONSTRUCTION AND
REPAIR
CUSTODIAL
SER VICES
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
STREET/SEWER MAINTENANCE
SEWER SYSTEM
OPERA T10NS
STREET OPERA T10NS/
STREET SWEEPING
STREET TREE
MAINTENANCE
TRAFFIC OPERATIONS
TRANSIT
ADMINISTRA TION
CONTRACT OPERA T10NS:
CHULA VISTA TRANSIT
CONTRACT OPERATIONS:
HANDYTRANS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Operating Budget:
Sewer Fund Budget:
Number of Positions:
Number of Sections:
$4,974,280
$9,334,530
65.23
9
Funding Sources for Operating Budget:
72 percent funded by CIP funds, developer deposits,
fees, Sewer funds, Gas Tax, Storm Drain Fee,
assessment district or open space funds. Remainder is
General Fund.
Sections
Administration Section
Engineering Design Section
Advance Planning/Sewers
Land Development
Construction Inspection/Surveying
Otay Ranch Engineering
Geographic Information Systems
Traffic Engineering
Traffic Light/Street Light Maintenance
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Objectives
*
Ensure that all private development projects are in
compliance with accepted engineering practice, City
codes, and State and Federal standards.
*
Develop and implement a Capital Improvement Program
that addresses the City's infrastructure needs.
*
Manage the City's sewage collection system and
maintain relations with our customers and the agencies
which transport and treat the City's sewage.
*
Administer State- and Federally- mandated programs,
such as the storm water discharge monitoring program
under the National Pollution Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit.
*
Plan and operate a street system, with necessary traffic
control elements, to efficiently handle the City's traffic
volumes and meet the City's traffic threshold standards.
*
Provide accurate and complete City base maps and
infrastructure databases.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Accomplishments
*
Construction of $9.5 million Broadway street widening
projects from F Street to Naples Street to improve
traffic safety, provide additional on street parking for
the businesses, improve the appearance of the street and
provide better access to the businesses.
*
Implementation of the Pavement Overlay program to
maintain our existing City streets in good condition and
to protect the City's investment in its infrastructure.
*
Construction of $13 million in improvements to Otay
Valley Road to improve traffic safety and access on this
heavily traveled major street
Challenges and Issues
*
Billing of City residents for sewer services from
Sweetwater Authority for approximately 15,700 accounts
*
Maintaining the City's growing infrastructure system
with dwindling or limited revenue sources
*
Working with CalTRANS on route adoption of SR-125
*
Ensuring the building of the San Miguel Connector
between SR-54 and the SR-125 toll road
*
Determining the appropriate sewer treattnent option for
Chula Vista
*
Developing a cost effective NPDES permit for the City
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Sample Performance Measures
*
Number of Public Works CIP projects bid annually
*
Percent of requests for sewer service charge refunds
responded to within 15 days
*
Number of final maps and parcel maps processed
*
Number of street vacations, easements and encroach-
ment requests processed
*
Inspection staff time needed per construction permit
*
Number of traffic investigations conducted
*
Number of new layers of map information developed by
GIS
*
Percent of burned out street lights replaced within 72
hours
,,' /
OPERA nONS DIVISION
Operating Budget:
Central Garage:
Equipment Replacement:
Number of Positions:
Number of Sections:
$5,892,818
$1,371,430
$ 855,860
93.25
4
Funding Sources for Operating Budget:
66% funded by CIP funds, Sewer funds, Gas Tax,
Storm Drain Fee and Transit funds. Remainder is
General Fund.
Sections
Administration
Street and Sewer Maintenance
- Traffic Operations Maintenance
-Street Operations
-Street Tree Maintenance
-Sewer System Operations
Building Maintenance
-Construction and Repair
-Custodial Services
-Building CIP Project Supervision
Equipment Maintenance
OPERA nONS DIVISION
Objectives
*
Provide a communication link (hotline) between the
public and City forces to report locations of graffiti and
to remove same.
*
Maintain sidewalks, curbs and gutters to eliminate trip
hazards and promote safe pedestrian movement
*
Maintain storm drain channels and other drainage
systems in conjunction to eliminate flooding and meet
State standards for siltation basins and the Bonita Long
Canyon Dam.
*
Trim trees which interfere with the line of sight of
motorists, obstruct traffic signals, or provide a hazard to
disabled people using sidewalks. Trim trees by contract
for maintaining long-term health of trees and for
aesthetic reasons.
*
Install, inspect, operate, maintain, and repair the 357
mile wastewater collection system.
*
Maintain streets to promote safe traffic flow and reduce
liability to the City, through reconstruction, resurfacing
and patching.
*
To protect the City's investment in the motor fleet and
other fixed assets by providing timely preventive
maintenance and to protect the environment by ensuring
that the motor fleet meet the current published standards
for vehicle exhaust emissions.
*
OPERA nONS DIVISION
Challenges and Issues
Keeping up with annual tree trimming, tree and stump
removal, service requests from the public, root pruning,
and holiday trim and decorations with 2 two-person
crews and a tree trimming contractor.
*
Having sufficient sewer personnel available to keep up
with sewer main cleaning, sewer lateral installations,
and repairs and sewer main inspections with TV
equipment and replacing obsolete and inoperable video
camera for inspections.
*
Having sufficient sewer section personnel to sawcut,
breakout, form, pour and finish all sidewalks,
driveways, curbs and gutters generated by sewer main
and lateral repairs.
*
Keeping up with utility markouts, as mandated by State
and Federal law, that are becoming increasingly more
time-consuming to complete.
*
Developing data base programs for energy management,
refrigerants management (required by Federal
regulations), lock and key controlled installation, and
HV AC equipment maintenance programs with up-to-date
record keeping.
OPERA nONS DIVISION
Sample Performance Measures
*
Number of miles of streets restriped
*
Percent of calls for graffiti removal handled within 72
hours of notification
*
Square footage of streets reconstructed and storm drain
channels cleaned
*
Number of street and park trees trimmed
*
Number of sewer mains cleaned and sewer laterals
repaired
*
Number of minor CIPs completed
*
Number of preventive maintenance inspections made on
City fleet
/
TRANSIT DIVISION
Operating Budget:
Number of Positions:
Number of Contract
Workers:
$3,958,340
3.00
76
Funding Sources:
State of California Transportation Development Act
(TDA) funds, Transnet funds and fare revenue
Sections
Administration
Contract Operations - Chula Vista Transit
Contract Operations - HandYtrans
, /
, ,
TRANSIT DIVISION
Objectives
* Develop public transportation services in the most cost
effective manner, by maintaining or exceeding total
passengers per revenue mile and total passengers per
revenue hour during each fiscal year, achieving an
operating cost per revenue mile and operating cost per
revenue hour at a rate increase that does not exceed the
annual San Diego area CPI, and maintaining or
improving both systems' recovery ratio (fare
revenue/operating costs).
* Increase the quality and quantity of public transportation
services to provide a means of transportation for people
without access to the automobile, and to offer a viable
transportation alternative to the automobile.
-,,,.
TRANSIT DIVISION
Accomplishments
*
Chula Vista Transit (CVT) had a record number of
passengers in FY 1994-95, a total of 2,311,434, an
increase of 4.7% from FY 1993-94.
*
Chula Vista Transit's recovery ratio (fare revenue -;-
operating cost) was 45%, a 1.6% increase from FY
1993-94.
*
HandYtrans ridership was 37,856, a 6.6% increase from
FY 1993-94.
*
HandY trans transported 5,722 non-ambulatory
passengers (persons in wheelchairs), an 1~. 7 % increase
from FY 1993-94. On an average daily basis,
HandYtrans carried 22 non-ambulatory passengers.
These are individuals, who under the Americans with
Disabilities Act, cannot use the fixed route bus system,
CVT, or the San Diego Trolley.
*
After years of planning, the Southwestern College Bus
Stop Improvement Project was approved by the College,
City, and County of San Diego. This project involves
expansion of the existing three bay bus stops on the
Southwestern College campus to six bays and the
addition of numerous passenger amenities, including
shelters, information kiosks, and landscaping. The
project is being funded by the County of San Diego
under its Transit Center Capital Program. Project
construction is scheduled to beginning in June 1996,
with completion by September 1996.
TRANSIT DIVISION
Challenges and Issues
*
To meet the ADA mandate that, effective January 27, 1997,
all fixed route public transit operations must have
complementary paratransit services available for use by
ADA certified individuals who are unable to use the fixed
route system; and that this paratransit service operate the
same hour and within a 1.5 mile corridor parallel to the
fixed route service. This requirement is an unfunded
mandate. Currently, HandYtrans operates Monday through
Friday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and on Sunday from
8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. By January 27, 1997, HandYtrans
must operate between approximately 5:00 a.m. and 11:30
p.m., seven days a week (the same hours as CVT).
*
To expand transportation services to areas of new
growth, particularly in eastern Chula Vista, in order to
achieve a service level where 80 % of the Chula Vista
population is located within 1/4 mile of a CVT bus
stop.
*
To expand CVT service frequencies on existing routes
to achieve maximum a service frequency of not more
than 1 hour, and to achieve a service frequency of 30
minutes on highly utilized routes that carry passengers
per mile greater than the system average of 1.93.
*
To improve access to CVT and HandYTrans for disabled
passengers in accordance with the standards and
requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
of 1990. Although all CVT buses are equipped with a
wheelchair lift and at least one tie-down position,
accessibility on CVT will be be improved by equipping all
new CVT vehicles with two wheel chair tie-down positions.
TRANSIT DIVISION
*
Sample Performance Measures
Number of transit passengers served
Amount of fare revenue collected
Operating cost per revenue mile
Recovery ratio
Revenue hours
Subsidy per passenger
Total miles
Operating cost per revenue hour
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
City of Chula "lsta
Rate of Growth Over 25 Years
(Base year: 1970)
140
20
120 - --
100------ -----
"-
Rate of
Change
80 - - --------.-
60 -------
, -
,
40 -. - . - - . - - - -
o
70
80
90
95
YEAR
Population (x 1 000) e7_1I01 83,1127 135,747 150
Road Mil.. le2 202 270 314
Ar.a(.q,ml.) 15 20 31.4 35,4
PW EmDloy... 110 III 159,23 1 e 1.48
* % Change-Pop. .. % Change-Roads * % Change-Area % % Change-PW Empl.