Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1989/10/26Thursday, October 26, 1989 City Council Conference 4:oo p.m. City Regular Workshop 1. ROLL CALL: Present were Councilmembers David Malcolm, Gayle L. McCandliss, Leonard M. Moore, Mayor Gregory R. Cox. Councilman Tim Nader arrived at 4:20 p.m. Also Present: City Manager, John D. Goss; City Attorney, Thomas J. Harron; and City Clerk, Beverly A. Authelet. ITEMS OF BUSINESS 2. CONSIDERATION OF THE NORMAN PARK SENIOR CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT - Mr. Manuel Mollinedo, Director of Parks and Recreation, introduced Ms. Jennifer Luce, of Visions, the architectural firm currently working on the Norman Park project. She gave a brief presentation of the proposed plans for the Norman Park Senior Center. The new proposal includes a second floor to be added to Cornell Hall which will include new storage areas, office spaces, stairways, and elevator. Current area is 2,000 square feet and the proposal would increase area to 5,200 square feet. The office area will consist of 3,500 square feet with a core area of 1,500 square feet. Total cost of the proposed addition will be approximately $600,000 without undergrounding of utilities. Cost of the total project is estimated to be $1.g million without undergrounding of utilities. Mayor Cox stated that undergrounding was recommended for the front of the Center. The approximate cost would be $75,000/$100,000 which would be eligible for 100% financing from the Transit Development Account. Mr. Martin Schmidt, Landscape Architect, introduced the following alternatives for parking: 1. separated driveway, 2. bus stop/drop off zone, 3. parking on Del Mar, and 4. modified/perimeter. Mr. Mollinedo stated that if the current architect proceeded with the plans, the delay would be for the Design Review process. Mayor Cox stated that there was a need for additional parking and recommended that the Project Area Review Committee review the possibility of purchase of the Community Congressional Church lots and the vacating of Center Street. Mayor Cox stated that the Subcommittee recommendations were as follows: 1. Accept concept of the second story on renovated Norman Park Center. 2. Direct present architect to complete revised plans including the second story over Cornell Hall. 3. Include bus/car drop off center in front of the Norman Park Center (Alternative #2). 4. Refer questions of additional angle parking on Del Mar and possibilities of acquiring additional parking off of Center Street to the Town Centre Project Advisory Committee and Safety Commission City Council Minutes ~2- October 26, 1989 (Alternative 3 and 4). 5. Direct staff to begin design of undergrounding in front of Norman Park Center. 6. Refer question of alternative roofing materials to Design Review Committee and City Council. Councilman Malcolm stated that he did not feel the roofing design was appropriate for the community and that areas such as the patio and wood overhang should be reviewed. He further stated that it was less expensive to add on to the Center now and hoped that the Design Review Committee would act quickly in working with the architect in order to finish within six weeks. Mayor Cox thanked John Willett, Maggie Vaughn, Jose Alberdi, Kay Dennison, Walt Vierra and staff for their work on this project. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that she liked the proposed changes as presented but expressed concern regarding the partitioning of the office space. Mr. Mollinedo stated that he had met with several of the potential users regarding their needs. He also stated that with the proposed design, if funds 1 at a were not available, the second floor could be left vacant and competed later date. MSCU (Cox/Malcolm) to accept the recommendations of the Subcommittee. Courtclinch Malcolm noted that a significant portion of the project funding could be saved by the acceptance of donations from developers and the community. This was done for the Boy's Club. City Manager Goss informed the Council that if additional funding was needed, staff would present the Council with an analysis and recommendations for further funding. MSCU (Moore/Malcolm) staff review the pros and cons of vacating Center Street to Del Mar to the east of the alley and obtaining input from the property owners. 2. CONSIDERATION OF CATV MATTERS Mr. Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance, stated that Mr. Carl Pilnick, Telecommunications Management Corporation, had been hired as an independent consultant to assist staff with the drafting of the ordinance, evaluation of Jones application, assist in negotiations, and advise staff and Council on cable related issues. Mr. Pilnick gave a presentation on competition within the cable companies and the effects upon communities served. Councilman Malcolm stated that he did not feel that all questions were answered regarding this issue and that he was not given sufficient time to review materials and the ordinance. He expressed concern over receiving adequate input from developers, cable firms and utilities. Mr. Pilnick stated that a new law imposing conditions upon franchisees would go into effect on 1/1/gO. One of the conditions would require the franchise holder to service all areas. The law is poorly written and does not specify a time limit in which this must be done. It also does not affect existing October ~6, ~ M~utes City Council Minutes -2- October (Alternative 3 and 4). 5.Direct staff to begin design of undergrounding in front o Park Center. 6. Refer question of alternative roofing materials to Design Committee and City Council. Councilman Malcolm stated that he did not feel the roofing desi appropriate for the community and that areas such as the patio an overhang should be reviewed. He further stated that it was less experts add on to the Center now and hoped that the Design Review Committee wou quickly in working with the architect in order to finish within six weeks Mayor Cox thanked John Willett, Maggie Vaughn, Jose Alberdi, Kay Dem Walt Vierra and staff for their work on this project. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that she liked the proposed change~ presented but expressed concern regarding the partitioning of the office s) Mr. Mollinedo stated that he had met with several of the potential u regarding their needs. He also stated that with the proposed design, if f were not available, the second floor could be left vacant and completed e later date. MSCU (Cox/Malcolm) to accept the recommendations of the Subcommittee. Councilman Malcolm noted that a significant portion of the project fund~ could be saved by the acceptance of donations from developers and community. This was done for the Boy's Club. City Manager Goss informed the Council that if additional funding was neede~ staff would present the Council with an analysis and recommendations fc further funding. MSCU (Moore/Malcolm) staff review the pros and cons of vacating Center Stree to Del Mar to the east of the alley and obtaining input from the proper~ owners, 2. CONSIDERATION OF CATV MATTERS Mr. Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance, stated that Mr. Carl Pilnick, Telecommunications Management Corporation, had been hired as an independent consul tant to assist staff with the drafting of the ordinance, evaluation of Jones application, assist in negotiations, and advise staff and Council on cable related issues. Mr. Pilnick gave a presentation on competition within the cable companies and the effects upon communities served. Councilman Malcolm stated that he did not feel that all questions were answered regarding this issue and that he was not given sufficient time to review materials and the ordinance. Me expressed concern over receiving adequate input from developers, cable firms and utilities. Mr. Pilnick stated that a new law imposing conditions upon franchisees would go into effect on l/l/90. One of the conditions would require the franchise holder to service all areas. The law is poorly written and does not time limit in which this must be done. It also City Council Minutes -4- October 26, 1989 reviewed by staff, take the time to work out issues to insure that the ordinance is proactive for all. He requested that the Council direct staff to obtain the consensus of the cable companies. Mr. Ted Barreras stated that he was a property owner in Chula Vista and National City and that he believes in competition but felt that dual pricing should not be allowed. Mr. Lee Druckman, Altronics, stated that the main subject is competition. He informed the Council that approximately 80% of the cables would be served by overhead poles. He then stated that costs of installation increases for each new firm granted a franchise. He felt is was important that everyone be heard due to the complexity of the issue. Mr. Bob Snyder, Eastlake Development Company, stated that they have worked closely with the staff and felt that staff had been very responsive. He also felt that there were no clear answers and would have requested more time to review the proposed ordinance. Mr. Ed Elliott, McMillin Communities, requested that the issues regarding trenching be removed from the ordinance and be addressed as a separate issue. Mr. Don E. Clerk, Jones Intercable, stated that there has been a lot of discussion but that he is not convinced that the City is moving in the right direction. He stated that the City is in a no-win situation. The City should not restrict competition by requiring city-wide service. Mr. Jim Fitzgerald, Total TV of California, stated that the Consultant was one of the best and that the issues were muddled. He felt that the economics were not present for the requirement to service the entire city. He felt that if such regulations were present, it would eliminate competition. Mr. Frank Marsman, SDG&E, stated that he has been serving as the Chairman of the City's Utility Committee. He stated his concern over the safety issues and standards that the utility companies are required to follow and new techniques that they are currently experimenting with in order to keep attachment fees lower. MSCU (Malcolm/Moore) to direct staff to review pros and cons of the ordinance, receive input from the Committees, cable companies, and utilities and report back to the City Council. Councilman Nader stated that he felt the staff was on the right track but that due to concerns and the complexity of the issues he felt that there should be more public participation and lead time. The City Council adjourned to Closed Session at 6:40 p.m. to discuss instructions to negotiators for award of Cable TV Franchise pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 - Jones Intercable; and a closed joint meeting of the Redevelopmerit Agency on the following: Potential acquisition of property located at: 4555 Otay Valley Road (Shell Oil Co., owner); 4501 Otay Valley Road ;(Roderick and Patricia Davies, owners); Parcel 624-060-27 on Otay Valley Road (Vincent and Margaret Davies, owners); Parcel 624-060-09 on Otay Valley Road (Vincent City Council Minutes -5- October 26, 1989 and Margaret Davies, owners); 4705 Otay Valley Road (Jimmie and judi Shinohara, owners); Parcel 644-040-14 (N&S Materials, owner); Parcel 644-040-40 (Walker Scott Properties/South Bay, owner); East H Street - Paseo Del Rey and Tierra Del Ray {Rancho Del Rey Partnership, owner). The meeting reconvened at 8:38 p.m. with Councilman Malcolm absent. 3. CONSIDERATION OF MONOLITHIC SIDEWALKS - Councilwoman McCandliss apologized for the late hour but that she felt parkways should be allowed for new development. Councilman Nader stated that if the Council felt that more discussion was needed then he would vote to continue but that he had read the report and was ready to vote tonight. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that she was concerned over the attitude of the report. She felt that even if parkways were approved that the staff was biased and stated that she wants to see developers given alternatives. Director of Public Works, John Lippitt, stated that San Diego was looking at meandering sidewalks. Due to the need for maintenance, it was recommended that parkways only be allowed where there is a homeowners association or maintenance district. Parkways would be recommended as an alternative for major roadways and collectors rather than residential areas. MSC (Nader/McCandliss) to direct staff to amend design manual so that it will not include preference for monolithic sidewalks 4-0-1 (Malcolm absent). Councilwoman McCandliss stated that the design manual should be presented with clear options and that design standards should include parkways and trees. Monolithic sidewalks should not be considered as standard. Councilman Moore stated that separate sidewalks should be allowed when adequate space is provided and under the conditions recommended by staff in their report. Mr. Lippitt stated that the City currently has standards regarding trees and landscaping and that the property owner would not be responsible for maintenance. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that if there were problems in implementation that staff should come back to Council. OTHER BUSINESS 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None. 6. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None. 7. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) a. Mayor Cox stated that there was concern over the liability to the City due /Z//' to the snow scene utilized during the annual Christmas Program. Councilman Nader requested clarification regarding liability. City Council Minutes -6- October 26, 1989 Mayor Cox stated that there has been a very good turn out every year but that it is a one shot activity. He felt that due to the change of date for the Star Light Parade and tree lighting ceremony held directly after, the public participation would be very good this year without the snow scene. Councilman Moore stated that he enjoyed the snow but was concerned over the liability to the City. City Attorney Hatton stated that his office voiced concern over the liability at the beginning but that the actual experience had not been bad. He stated that the insurance covered only those persons standing around the snow scene and not those participating and that he could not recommend the City participation in the program. MSC (McCandliss/Moore) to approve for this year the recommendation to have the tree lighting after the parade and the distribution of commemorative holiday ornaments and refreshments 3-1-0 (Nader No, Malcolm absent). Mayor Cox questioned whether money utilized for refreshments or if donated to the Red Cross for utilization in San Francisco would be considered a gift of public funds. City Attorney Hatton stated that these uses would not constitute a gift of public funds. MSC (Nader/Moore) to donate the unused portion of money budgeted to the Red Cross to be utilized in San Francisco for earthquake relief 4-0-0 (Malcolm absent}. City Manager Goss informed the Council that the City is checking with San Francisco to see if there is any assistance we can give. The Chief Building Official from the City went to San Francisco to evaluate the situation and will report back to Council. b. Mayor Cox stated that during previous negotiations with City personnel, the position of Mayor/Council Secretary had been omitted. MSC (Cox/Moore) to form a Subcommittee to determine annual compensation for Mayor/Council Secretary. Subcommittee is to be Mayor Cox and Councilwoman McCandliss 4-0-0 (Malcolm absent). 8. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Moore noted the following: a. Requested information regarding the joint meetings to be held with the water and school districts and the preparation of information packets. He stated that he would meet with City Manager Goss. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:09 p.m. to the Special Meeting of the Chula Vista City Council, Thursday, October 26, 1989 in the City Council Conference Room, 426 Fourth Avenue. Mayor Cox called the Special Meeting to order at 9:09 p.m. with Councilman Malcolm absent. City Council Minutes -7- October 26, 1989 1. CONSIDER LETTER TO STATE AGENCIES REGARDING THE SDG&E POWER PLANT - City Attorney Hatton presented a draft letter to the Council for review. He stated that it was short and cataloged the actions of the Council as requested and stated their concerns. Councilman Nader stated that he felt the letter was good but questioned the addressing of correspondence to staff instead of the elected or appointed officials. Councilman Moore agreed that correspondence should be mailed to all officials. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that she felt the sentence regarding the environmental impact review was misleading and preferred the word "support". She also questioned whether the letter stated why the City is concerned. City Attorney Harron stated that the letter could be modified to include: the Cit of Chula Vista is currently reconsidering land use on this property and wou~d like to confirm your assurances that will be the City's position reviewed when a proposal is submitted. Councilman Moore stated that the letter should be mailed to the State Energy Commission, Costal Commission, and the Public Utilities Commission. City Attorney Harron stated that SDG&E had not filed to dismiss the suit but felt that they would file on Friday, October 27, 1989. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:20 p.m. to the next Regular Meeting of Tuesday, November 7, 1989 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Respectful 1 y submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk Vicki qulst, D City Clerk