HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1995/12/12
UI d€'C~3r~ un '~er
em'<c e
,;y;~" n- - ",i'I'"'," tLat I am
'~;n he
0, ~ce
S ('d
ths PHc', BOil,U c:~
Tuesday, December 12,1995 the PUbiiC.1€I}V'~~ i:\,','.',~niC~ i:l~ Cit' ;:311 on Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. DA TED~ /~/ ? ~') ~iG~~ED f/' . ----"Public Services Building
/ / ,_/ '
Regular Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Council members Alevy _, Moot _, Padilla _' Rindone _' and
Mayor Horton _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
December 5, 1995
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Oath of Office:
Jerry Schlegel - International Friendship Commission;
Linda Jean Allen - Resource Conservation Commission; and
Katie Baker - Youth Commission.
b. Presentation from Advocation, Inc. regarding 1996 state legislative year. The City's
Sacramento lobbyist will present a brief report and answer questions regarding the second year
of the 1995/96 legislative session and strategies for promoting the City's adopted Legislative
Program (as it will be amended for 1996 via Agenda Item Number 7).
*****
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting.
Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However,
final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 14)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete
the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to
the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and
Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICA nONS:
a. Letter from Susan Bright regarding the overcrowding on Bus Route Number 709. It is
recommended that Route 709 continue to be monitored and that Ms. Bright be notified of staffs
actions in this regard.
b. Letter of resignation from Marsha Killian - Town Centre Project Area Committee. It is
recommended that the resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post
immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library.
Agenda
-2-
December 12, 1995
6. ORDINANCE 2657 AMENDING V ARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING LOST AND STOLEN PROPERTY
(first readinl!:) - Currently the Municipal Code does not provide for the donation
of property to charitable organizations. The amendment will allow for such in
the future. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading.
(Chief of Police)
7. RESOLUTION 18151 AMENDING THE 1995/96 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM AND
LEGISLATIVE WORK PROGRAM - The Legislative Program represents
Council's consensus position on items likely to be acted upon by the State
Legislature, Congress, or administrative agencies. By adopting a Legislative
Program at the beginning of each two-year legislative session, Chula Vista can
take a proactive role in sponsoring, supporting, or opposing bills related to the
City's various legislative priorities. Midway through that two-year term,
Council reconsiders the program to add, amend or delete items as appropriate
for the City's changing priorities or to react to changes or new proposals in the
Legislature. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Legislative
Committee and Assistant City Manager)
8. RESOLUTION 18152 DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE CITY TO WITHDRAW AS A
MEMBER FROM THE JOINT POWERS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT
AUTHORITY - In May 1991, the City entered into an agreement for the joint
exercise of powers with other public agencies to establish, manage, operate and
maintain a Medical Premium Retirement Benefit Plan. The plan provides
employees with the opportunity to make unlimited pre-tax salary contributions
to fund health insurance premiums in retirement. Staff is currently evaluating
whether this arrangement is still the best means of providing this benefit. The
subject resolution will allow the City to withdraw at the earliest date if a better
alternative is identified. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Personnel)
9. RESOLUTION 18153 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING
AGREEMENT WITH COTTON/BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC. TO
AUTHORIZE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT NO TO EXCEED $69,586.50
FOR ADDITIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE
PREPARATION OF THE OTAY RANCH SPA ONE PROJECT
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY
MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT - The amendment is
necessary to cover an expanded scope-of-work and EIR recirculation that was
not anticipated when the Three Party Agreement was prepared. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Special Planning Projects Manager,
Otay Ranch)
10. RESOLUTION 18154 APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING
AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES TO AUTHORIZE AN
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 44,528 FOR ADDITIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF
THE OTAY RANCH SPA ONE PROJECT PUBLIC FACILITIES
FINANCING PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT - The amendment is necessary to cover an
expanded scope-of-work to analyze Alternative B-2 that was not anticipated
when the Three Party Agreement was prepared. Staff recommends approval of
the resolution. (Special Planning Projects Manager, Otay Ranch)
Agenda
-3-
December 12, 1995
11. RESOLUTION 18155 ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY MATCHING FUNDS
AWARDED TO THE CHULA VISTA LITERACY TEAM,
APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR
1995/96 BUDGET - The California State Library has announced that California
Library Services Act funds are available to supplement funds raised locally by
California Literacy Campaign member libraries. The match is based on $1 for
every $5.63 raised locally and spent during fiscal year 1995196. Accepting the
grant will provide $26,681 in fiscal year 1995/96 to the Chula Vista Literacy
Team. The funds cannot supplant existing funds. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Library Director) 4/5th's vote required.
12. RESOLUTION 18156 AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 BUDGET TO ESTABLISH TWO
INTERN POSITIONS (0.96 FTE) AND EXPAND THE EXISTING PART-
TIME TEMPORARY EXPERT PROFESSIONAL POSITION FROM 0.48
TO 0.75 FTE WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING AND
HOUSING AND APPROPRIATING $14,000 FROM CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GG-I44 TO ACCOUNT 100-1320-5105 - The
Department of Building and Housing is seeking additional part-time positions to
facilitate implementation of selected programs administered by the Department.
This action represents a redirecting of resources with a Capital Improvement
Project previously approved. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Building and Housing) 4/5th's vote required.
13. RESOLUTION 18157 EXERCISING THE CITY'S OPTION TO RENEW THE R. F. DICKSON
STREET SWEEPING AGREEMENT ON THE SAME TERMS AND
CONDITIONS FOR SIX MONTHS (JANUARY 1 THROUGH JUNE 30,
1996) AND DIRECTING THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DELIVER A COPY HEREOF TO THE CONTRACTOR - On 9/22/92,
Council approved a contract with R.F. Dickson, Inc. to provide City-wide street
sweeping services. The agreement provided for three years (1/1/93 through
12/31/95) of street sweeping. In addition, the agreement permitted two
additional one year renewals. The contractor has agreed in a letter dated
11/3/95 to keep the current prices for calendar year 1996. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
14. RESOLUTION 18158 APPROVING UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT FOR
TRANSIT SERVICES - The agreement incorporates three cooperative
functions among Metropolitan Transit Development Board area transit operators:
cash fare structure, regional tickets and passes, and transfer procedures. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
Agenda
-4-
December 12, 1995
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to
speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation,' complete
the pink fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per
individual.
15.A. PUBLIC HEARING
PCM-96-07; CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THEEASTLAKE
II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (EASTLAKE I EXTENSION),
EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA), PLANNED
COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULA TIONS, AIR QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WATER CONSERV A nON PLAN AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN - The purpose of the amendments are to
relocate two neighborhood park parcels, expand the area available for
community purpose facilities, transfer densities among parcels within the SPA,
adjust land use and parcel boundaries and designate parcel R-26 for low income
housing in accordance with the recently adopted EastLake Affordable Housing
Program and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement. Staff
recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading and approve the
resolution and accept the report. (Director of Planning)
ORDINANCE 2658 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I
EXPANSION) PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
(LAND USE DISTRICT MAP ONLY) (first readinl!:)
RESOLUTION 18159 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I
EXPANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS AIR
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS WATER
CONSERVATION PLAN AND EASTLAKE GREENS PUBLIC
FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
REPORT
EASTLAKE PARK ISSUES - The report addresses an unresolved park issue
associated with the processing of amendments to the EastLake Greens Public
Facilities Financing Plan (as identified in the GDP/SPA Plan Amendment). The
main focus of the report is to ensure that the community center identified in the
EastLake Park Agreement is financed and constructed by the EastLake
Development Company.
B.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the
Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally
prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to
address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications
Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
Agenda
-5-
December 12, 1995
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by
the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council
and staffrecommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please
fill out a "Request to Speak" fonn available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to five minutes.
16. RESOLUTION 18160 APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION OF A "PERFORMANCE BASED"
BUDGET PROGRAM - On 11/14/95, Council referred to the City Manager
to return with a formal report and implementing document information to begin
the implementation of a "performance based" budget. It is recommended that
the City begin the transition as part of the development of the fiscal year
1996/97 budget process. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Budget
Manager)
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers.
Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
17. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
18. MA YOR'S REPORT(S)
a. Appointment of Mayor Pro Tempore for 1996.
b. Ratification of appointment: Elizabeth Karin Cox - Youth Commission.
19. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on December 19,
1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City
Council Meeting.
Agenda
-6-
December 12, 1995
*****
CLOSED SESSION
Unless -the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are pennitted by law to be the subject of a closed
session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the
interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of final action
taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed
sessions, the videotaping will be tenninated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from
closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
20. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING
1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
. Chula Vista and nine other cities vs. the County of San Diego regarding solid waste
issues (trash litigation).
2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 1.
SALE AND DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
. Purchase of property from R.E. Hazard Contracting Company, 1855 Maxwell Road, Chula Vista,
CA.
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
. Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive
Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of
Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Association (POA) and International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF).
Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
21. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
* * * * *
December 7, 1995
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and city coun~";~
John D. Goss, City Manage~~ byr~~l
City Council Meeting of DeCembJd 12, 1995
TO:
FROM:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular
ci ty Council meeting of Tuesday, December 12, 1995. Comments
regarding the Written Communications are as follows:
5a. This is a letter from Ms. Susan Bright regarding bus over
crowding on the 7:00 a.m. trip of Chula vista Transit Route
709. The Transit Coordinator checked the boardings on the
7:00 a.m. Route 709 trip on Monday, December 4, 1995 and
Tuesday, December 5, 1995, and also discussed the capacity
issue with San Diego Transit operations supervisors (the Chula
vista Transit contract operators). There currently does not
appear to be a capacity problem on this trip. Ms. Bright
boards the 709 at H Street/Second Avenue. On both December 4
and 5, 1995, there were approximately 12 standees on the bus
when it reached the H Street/Second Avenue stop. Since the
bus is designed to accommodate approximately 30 standees,
there was sufficient capacity remaining for Ms. Bright to
board on both days and to accommodate the few remaining
passengers that are picked up on that trip at subsequent stops
to the east as the route proceeds to Southwestern College.
The Transit Coordinator spoke with Ms. Bright before she
boarded the bus on Tuesday morning. Ms. Bright indicated that
the main problem with this bus is that on some occasions the
standees congregate toward the front of the bus instead of
moving to the rear. Additionally, at the beginning of each
new Southwestern College semester, there are more students
taking CVT buses to the College; ridership tends to moderate
somewhat after the first week or two of each new semester.
The Transit Coordinator has directed San Diego Transit
operations supervisors to monitor the 7:00 a.m. Route 709 trip
on a daily basis; to instruct the driver to request standees
to move toward the rear of the bus; to have a road supervisor
at the H Street Trolley station prior to the 7: 00 a.m.
departure in order to assist in distributing passenger loading
between the Route 709 and 704 trips to Southwestern College;
and to report any over capacity problems immediately if they
occur. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ROUTE 709 CONTINUE TO BE
MONITORED AND THAT MS. BRIGHT BE NOTIFIED OF STAFF'S ACTIONS
IN THIS REGARD.
Sb. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE RESIGNATION OF MARSHA KILLIAN FROM
THE TOWN CENTRE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET
AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING
TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY.
JDG:mab
I~
I ~ I
I' i r---n_-
{I
ill I
'l
It; :'I
~ I
27 NOVEMBER 1995
RECEIVEC}
..J l !Jj\j ':; 0 1995
TO: CHULA VI~TA CITY COUNCIL
276 4th AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
"95 NOY 31 1111:10
Ii," ',",YY, ',f CHULA VIS,''''
.,. ClfftK'S OFHC [
COUNCil OFFICES
Cf1ill A VIST A, CA
FROM:
SUSAN BRIGHT
210 H STREET APT. N
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
TO WHOM THIS MATTER CONCERNS:
THIS LETTER IS BEING ADDRESSED TO THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
BECAUSE IT WAS SUGGESTED TO ME BY ONE OF THE SUPERVISORS OF THE
CHULA VISTA TRANSIT AS THE DIRECTION IN WHICH TO VENT MY FRUSTRA-
TION OVER A MATTER THAT NEEDS ATTENDING TO IMMEDIATELY.
I AM A DAILY COMMUTER ON THIS BUS LINE AND I HOLD A MONTHLY PASS.
AS A CITIZEN OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE PAST 25 YEARS AND A FORMER TAX
PAYER, I BELIEVE I HAVE A RIGHT TO BE TRANSPORTED SAFELY' AND TIME-
LY. THIS HAS NOT BEEN THE CASE.
MY MAIN FOCUS IS IN REGARDS TO BUS ROUTE #709, AND PARTICULARLY THE
ONE THAT DEPARTS THE H STREET TROLLY STATION, MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY
AT 7:00 A.M. DAILY, THIS BUS IS OVER~PACKED WITH COLLEGE STUDENTS,
MOSTLY WHO HAVE COME ACCROSS THE BORDER TO ATTEND SCHOOL, LEAVING
VIRTUALLY NO ROOM FOR ADDITONAL PASSENGERS WHO ARE AWAITING EN ROUTE.
I AM ONE OF THOSE PASSENGERS, AND MY SON TRAVELS WITH ME EACH MORN-
ING, AS HE ATTENDS OLYMPICVIEW ELEMENTARY AND I WORK AT EASTLAKE
HIGH SCHOOL. WE TAKE THE BUS BECAUSE WE HAVE NO OTHER TRANSPORTA-
TION AVAILABLE TO US.
IF THE DRIVER CHOOSES TO LET US BOARD, WE ARE CERTAINLY STANDING
IN FRONT OF THE YELLOW LINE, WHICH IS CONSIDERED ILLEGAL, IF NOT
VERY DANGEROUS. BUT, WE HAVE NO CHOICE BECAUSE THIS IS THE MOST
CONVENIENT TIME FOR US TO LEAVE EACH MORNING. WE SHOULD BE ACCOM-
ODATED, AND THE DRIVERS DO THEIR BEST TO GET US TO WHERE WE NEED
TO GO, SAFETY OR NO SAFETY. THEY ARE STUCK BECAUSE THEY FEEL FOR
THE COMMUTERS, YET THEY REALIZE THE DANGER. EACH MORNING THE DE-
CISION TO LET US ON OR NOT IS ARBITRARY.
IMAGINE THE SCENARIO IF THERE WAS AN ACCIDENT: PEOPLE LUNGING
FORWARD; PEOPLE POSSIBLY GOING THROUGH THE FRONT WINDOW; PERHAPS
SERIOUS INJURIES AND EVEN DEATH; LAW SUITS; ETC., ETC.
I HAVE COMPLAINED TO THE IMMEDIATE SUPERVISORS. THEY CLAIM TO
HAVE NO CONTROL, THAT IT IS THE CITY WHO WILL NOT PROVIDE THE
NECESSARY FUNDS FOR ANOTHER RUS. IS THE CITY THAT CHEAP AS TO
PUT PEOPLES LIVES IN DANGER BY STUFFING AS MANY OF US ON THE BUS
SO THEY CAN COLLECT TWICE THE NORMAL FAIRE FOR ONE RUN?
u :;.~ ~~;2 ('l') -'1~
t:Ys /~~
0;L " Zf'/'4/J-:> r// ,
~ ~'\. --'".J'- /) ')
-~ ,,,,: . C~~;/~~vr:-......
',' ".
,.!.,<~~ J
r~
/_ ,) J,.:::: k;' r
7/'7/--
h,'/
I OFFER SEVERAL SUGGESTIONS:
#1: HAVE TWO EXPRESS BUSES TO THE COLLEGE LEAVING BETWEEN
7:00 A.M. AND & 7:30 A.M. WHILE STILL MAINTAINING THE
REGULAR 709 DEPARTURES AS SCHEDULED.
#2: HAVE THREE 709 DEPARTURES AT 10 MINUTE INTERVALS BETWEEN
7:00 A.M. & 7:30 A.M. THIS WOULD INVOLVE ONE BUS EXTRA
AT ONLY ONE TIME. YOU WOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR ANOTHER DRIVER
BUT IT IS BETTER THAN A LAW SUIT.
THE TRANSIT SYSTEM IS ESTABLISHED FOR THE COMMUNITY. WE ARE ENTITL-
ED TO THIS SERVICE.
I HAVE BEEN REFUSED PASSAGE SEVERAL TIMES AND THIS HAS DISRUPTED
MY TIME SCHEDULE. MY SON HAS BEEN LATE FOR SCHOOL BECAUSE WE HAVE
MISSED OUR 711 CONNECTION WHICH WE GET IN FRONT OF SOUTHWESTERN
COLLEGE IF WE ARE THERE ON TIME. THE ONLY WAY WE ARE THERE IS IF
WE TAKE THE BUS THAT DEPARTS THE H STREET STATION AT 7:00 A.M.
IF WE WAIT AND CATCH THE 709 THAT DEPARTS AT 7:20 A.M., THEN THERE
IS AN 85% CHANCE WE WILL MISS THE CONNECTION. THEIR PASSING TIMES
ARE MINUTES FROM MEETING.
IF THIS MATTER IS NOT ADDRESSED AND ATTENDED TO EXPEDITIO~Y, THEN
I WILL CALL THE PAPER AND HAVE THEM INVESTIGATE THIS CHRONIC PR~B-
LEM. IT HAS BEEN REPORTED TO ME THAT THERE ARE MORE STUDENTS THAN
EVER ATTENDING SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE, ESPECIALLY THOSE COMING FROM
ACROSS THE BORDER. THESE FACTS NEED TO BE CONSIDERED AND SOMETHING
NEEDS TO BE DONE TO ACCOMODATE THE INCREASING LOAD.
I WOULD APPRECIATE AN ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF THIS LETTER. I WOULD LIKE
TO KNOW WHO HAS READ THIS AND WAS IT SUBMITTED TO THE PROPER PERSON(S).
THANK YOU AND I LOOK FORWARD TO HEARING FROM YOU VERY SOON.
J..-~ ~ ~
SUSAN BRIGHT
TELEPHONE: 691-1876
WORK TELE: 585-6211 or 585-6127
c: Chula Vista Transit
-2-
...--
L- -'/
<./ a.. ~
I- f(UM' i"C':' Wt.:, I L;UH:' I 1>1 U
I-HX' bl~-4(2-6(Ul
Dec-Bl-95 Fri 16'36
PRGE. B2
TO:
Miguel Tapia
Marsha Killian W-
December 1 ~ 1995
"ECEtVEO
"95 lIC -5 ml :.:4
I..... Y if CHULA VIS
.. "IV OlEftK'S OFflC
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Towne Centre Project Area Committee
Effective today I have resigned my position as Executive Director of the West
Coast Division of Pacific Physician Services. My new position with t.he
University of California. San Diego will not include managing any business
enterprises in the downtown business district of Chula Vistat and therefore I
am no longer eligible to serve on the TCPAC.
Please extend my best wishes to the members of tile committee in their
continuing efforts to strengthen tltis vital commercial area of our city. I've
enjoyed working with you. Thanks for all your support!
( 'c-'..' c: Zz J7f/2-t~ (/L/ )
~ -// /'-" -'
, '// /W;' ,
. /. / /-
-:', L,(; ~ /" ~7
/ " r----
C,/ . //1) I
~ /., 5! {-<.)~ L j/--r~
(/
~\ R~~.j f~r~ f)
,""".,to") !J 4iI ,.'
" 'f ''1' &:~' ';
'" Ii, ",.',;,
~... ~:. i. ,,;if,. f'.;t
"''-' ,Y"',-'-f ] ,
\~l '.< \i.~, ~~.
I
~ /~c0'~
sP;,J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
t
MEETING DATE 12-12-95
ITEM TITLE: Ordinance eJ.d,5''l Amending Chula vista Municipal Codes
2.60.020, 2.60.030 and 2.60.150
" .
SUBMITTED BY: Chief of pOli~e4~F<o.-;.J '\ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~i~~~~\ (4jSth's vote: Yes__No Xl
'-.j
As currently constructed the Chula vista Municipal Code does not
provide for the donation of lost or stolen property to charitable
organizations. The proposed ordinance amends Chapter 2.60 of the
Chula vista Municipal Code to provide for such donations.
RECOMMENDATION:
Place the Ordinance on first reading.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
The Chula vista Police Activities League was formed in January 1992.
The mission of the Police Activities League is to improve the quality
of life in Chula vista by establishing a union between youth and the
community. This is to be accomplished by leading youth to positive
life choices through affirmative interaction in academics, recreation
and social events. Some of the goals of the Police Activities League
are to strengthen the decision making skills of youth; to offer
constructive leisure alternatives, to provide positive role models to
the youth of Chula vista and to collaborate with other youth servicing
agencies to ensure services are maximized to their fullest extent.
The Police Activities League has set about accomplishing these goals
through numerous chari table events and programs. Notable among the
successful programs administered by PAL and related organizations are
the Midnight Basketball program involving "at risk" teenagers in the
community; the athletic programs provided by the Otay Golden Hands
Boxing Club, whose programs are funded almost solely with PAL money;
the 1994 Holiday Toy and Food Drive, which benefited over 1000
children and 300 families and numerous social events such as off-road
races and sporting events to which children have opportunities to
attend at no cost.
The 1994 Holiday Toy and Food Drive was successful in part because we
were able to provide bicycles to needy children who otherwise would
not have received such an expensive gift. The 15 bicycles which were
donated were selected from bicycles which had been in impound for
approximately three months. All of the bicycles had been kept for the
required period of time and were designated for auction. The bicycles
are generally auctioned at a fraction of their true value and net the
City's general fund a minimal amount of money.
t~/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
PAGE 2, ITEM
~
MEETING DATE
12-12-95
The recommended amendments to the Municipal Code, would enable PAL to
select from the stock of police impounded bicycles set for auction
throughout the year enabling PAL to choose from a much larger pool of
bikes for distribution to needy children in the community. The
ability to distribute these bicycles would strongly emphasize the
Pol ice Department and the City's commitment to Communi ty Oriented
Policing and strengthen the bond between the Police Department and the
youth of the City of Chula vista. The donation of bicycles last year
required a special act of City Council. These amendments would make
it unnecessary for city Council to take special action each year.
Bicycles would be distributed at the direction of the PAL board of
directors to needy children in the City of Chula vista. The Police
Activities League would be designated to oversee and control the
distribution of the bicycles. P.A.L. has received a commitment from
Laidlaw to provide a storage container for the selected bicycles at no
cost. We also have a space donated by Cal-Stores in the 900 block of
Broadway, adjacent to the SVPP satellite office, to place the
container.
steps have been taken to ensure that the city will not be subject to
claims for injuries incurred by youth riding donated bikes. The
Automobile Club of Southern California bicycle mechanics inspect the
bicycles to insure they are road safe. All families receiving bikes
sign a release of liability form relieving the City of Chula vista of
responsibility for injuries sustained by riders of the bikes. These
forms will be maintained by the PAL Board of Directors. Additionally,
each individual receiving a bicycle is also provided with a new
bicycle helmet.
Copies of the proposed amended city ordinances (Attachment A) and the
Acceptance and Acknowledgement forms (Attachments B and C) are
attached to this report. PAL is currently working with the City
Attorney to develop a release of liability form that the recipient
will be required to sign on acceptance of a bicycle.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Bicycles typically bring an average of $18.00 each at auction. In
fiscal year 1994-1995 16 bicycles were diverted to P.A.L. by council
action, for a total impact of $288.00. Staff anticipates similar
donation levels in the future. The number of bicycles which are of
quality to be donated comprise a small percentage of the total
bicycles impounded. Therefore staff sees no need to limit the number
of bicycles which can be donated.
cym
t~
ORDINANCE NO.
02t,5?
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 2.60 OF
THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING LOST
AND STOLEN PROPERTY
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That section 2.60.020 of the Chula vista
Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
2.60.020 Holding period-Bicycles and perishable material-Sale
permitted when.
Unclaimed perishable property may be sold at public auction or
transferred in the manner set forth in this chapter for personal
property other than perishable property prior to the expiration of
the six-month period. Bicycles may be sold at public auction in
the same manner, or donated to a non-profit, charitable
orqanization desiqnated by the chief of police after being held by
the police department for a period of at least ninety days.
SECTION II: That section 2.60.030 of the Chula vista
Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
2.60.030 Sale-Procedure generally.
After holding such unclaimed property for the period described
herein, the same shall be sold by the chief of police or his duly
authorized representative, at public auction to the highest bidder
or, in the case of unclaimed bicycles only, may be donated to a
non-profit, charitable orqanization desiqnated by the chief of
police. Any donation of bicycles shall be made pursuant to
department policy for desiqnation of eliqible non-profit,
charitable orqanizations which shall set forth standards including,
but not limited to: that the recipient orqanization will use the
bicycles for donation to youths determined to be "at risk" or of
special financial need and that donations of bicycles will not be
made to members of the police department or their respective
families. Alternatively, pursuant to the provisions of section
2.60.035 said unclaimed property may be transferred to the City.
SECTION III: That section 2.60.150 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code is amended to read as follows:
2.60.150 Vesting of title to unclaimed property in finder.
A. Valuation of Twenty-five Dollars or More.
~';J
If the reported value of the property. is twenty-five dollars
or more and no owner appears and proves his ownership of the
property. within ninety. days, the police department shall
cause notice of the property to be published at least once in
a newspaper of general circulation. If, after seven days
following the first publication of the notice, no owner
appears and proves his ownership of the property and the
person who found or saved the property. pays the cost of the
publication, the title shall vest in the person who found or
saved the property unless the property was found in the course
of employment by an employee of any public agency in which
case the property shall be sold at public auction. Title to
the property shall not vest in the person who found or saved
the property or in the successful bidder at the public auction
unless the Required Fee(s) is first paid to the city, county,
or city and county whose police department caused the notice
to be published.
B. Valuation of Less Than Twenty-five Dollars.
If the reported value of the property is less than twenty-five
dollars and no owner appears and proves his ownership of the
property wi thin ninety days, the title shall vest in the
person who found or saved the property, unless the property.
was found in the course of employment by an employee of any
public agency, in which case the property shall be sold at
public auction.
C. Exception - Bicycle.
If the found or saved property is a bicycle, if no owner
appears and proves ownership of the bicycle wi thin ninety
days, the title shall not vest in the person who found or
saved the bicycle. All such unclaimed bicycles shall be sold
at public auction or donated for charitable purposes pursuant
to this chapter.
SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in
full force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Richard P. Emerson, Chief
of Police
c: \ or\ chap260
t'{
A'l rACHMENT A
~ ...._-.....,...
:r'. ' ".' '. ' ,
~~" '," ".", ~ ,
....1 '
[. : '
,
t
I
r....
....--.................... ~:' r,f''-''''''~r:~
:.;t."J
,
1-. i
.' . \
~~i.:.;,j ~D!NANCE"'''N~
f J
""'j
l "
r., j
r,,:,
10,
W
MEETING DATE: 12-12-9
ATTACHMENT A
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS
OF CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING LOST AND STOLEN PROPERTY.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: That section 2.60.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code is amended to read:
2.60.020 Holding period-Bicycles and perishable material-Sale or
Donation permitted when.
Unclaimed perishable property may be sold at public auction or
transferred in the manner set forth in this chapter for personal
property other than perishable property prior to the expiration of
the six-month period. Bicycles may be sold at public auction in
the same manner. or donated to a non-profit. charitable
organization desiqnated by the chief of police after being held by
the pOlice department for a period of at least ninety days. (Ord.
2098 Sl (part), 1985; Ord. 1067 Sl (part), 1967; prior code S2.38).
SECTION II: That Section 2.60.030 of the Chula vista Municipal
Code is amended to read:
2.60.030 Sale or Donation-Procedure generally.
After holding such unclaimed property for the period described
herein, the same shall be sold by the chief of police or his duly
authorized representativeT at public auction to the highest bidder
or. in the case of unclaimed bicycles onlY. may be donated to a
non-prof it. chari table organization desiqnated by the chief of
police. Any donation of bicycles shall be made pursuant to
department policy for desiqnation of eliqible non-profit.
charitable orqanizations which shall set forth standards includinq.
but not limited to: that the recipient orqanization will use the
bicycles for donation to youths determined to be "at risk" or of
special financial need and that donations of bicycles will not be
made to members of the police department or their respective
families. Alternatively, pursuant to the provisions of Section
2.60.035 said unclaimed property may be transferred to the City.
(Ord. 2098 Sl (part), 1985; Ord. 1067 Sl (part), 1967; prior code
S2.39) .
ATTACHMENT A
~f
t-,TTACHMENT A
MEETING DATE: 12-12-9
PAGE 2
ATTACHMENT A
SECTION III: That Section 2.60.150 of the Chula Vista Municipal
code is amended to read:
2.60.150 vesting of title to unclaimed property in finder.
A. Valuation of Twenty-five Dollars or More.
If the reported value of the property. is twenty-five dollars
or more and no owner appears and proves his ownership of the
property. within ninety. days, the police department shall
cause notice of the property to be published at least once in
a newspaper of general circulation. If, after seven days
following the first publication of the notice, no owner
appears and proves his ownership of the property and the
person who found or saved the property. pays the cost of the
publication, the title shall vest in the person who found or
saved the property unless the property was found in the course
of employment by an employee of any public agency in which
case the property shall be sold at public auction. Title to
the property shall not vest in the person who found or saved
the property or in the successful bidder at the public auction
unless the Required Fee(s) is first paid to the city, county,
or city and county whose police department caused the notice
to be published.
B. Valuation of Less Than Twenty-five Dollars.
If the reported value of the property is less than twenty-five
dollars and no owner appears and proves his ownership of the
property wi thin ninety days, the title shall vest in the
person who found or saved the property, unless the property.
was found in the course of employment by an employee of any
public agency, in which case the property shall be sold at
public auction.
C. Exception - Bicycle.
If the found or saved property is a bicycle, if no owner
appears and proves ownership of the bicycle within ninety
days, the title shall not vest in the person who found or
saved the bicycle. All such unclaimed bicycles shall be sold
at public auction or donated for charitable purposes pursuant
to this chapter.
SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Presented by:
Approved as to form by:
Richard P. Emerson,
Chief of
r-'
f".--'-""~~
I , -, - ~ .
~ " ; \,'
._. h .4IW..'\"i
Erik R. Basil,
Acting Assistant
City Attorney
,..)
:j
I "ij
~
~-~
i 1
.'-
~~ ~~
ATTACHMENT A
AlL' ;:IDiENT B
MEETING DATE: 12-12-~
ATTACHMENT B
!HAPPY HOLIDAYS/ FELICES DIAS DE FIESTA!
The Police Activities League wishes you a Merry Christmas, and
hopes you will enjoy your bicycle. Riding bicycles is a lot of
fun, but as with all recreational activities, accidents can and
do occur. We want you to be careful and ride safely. Please
read each section of this agreement carefully and ask questions
if you don to clearly understand any part of it.
Please
initial:
ATTACHMENT B
1. I understand that all riders (adults and
children) should wear a bicycle helmet whenever
riding a bicycle. I promise to wear my helmet
whenever I ride my bike.
2. I understand that this bicycle is subject to all
the laws of the road, and that I have to obey
traffic rules when I ride it.
3. I have been instructed in the use of brakes and
gear shifting mechanisms, and in the use of brakes
and gear shifting mechanisms, and in the use of all
quick release mechanisms (wheels, seatposts, and
brakes) as well as any wheel retention devices on
this bicycle.
4. I understand reflectors are a safety item
installed on the bicycle and should not be removed.
5. I understand that the bicycle I am receiving is
a "used" bicycle, is not brand new, and is not
waranteed or guaranteed by the Police Activities
League or the City of Chula vista.
6. I understand regular maintenance is required to
keep this bicycle operating properly and that if I
don't take care of my bike, it may be unsafe to
ride. I know that "regular maintenance" includes
frequent inspection of all quick release mechanisms
and wheel retention devices. I also understand that
maintaining appropriate tire pressure at all times
is essential for the safe use of this bicycle. The
recommended tire pressure is marked on the tire.
7. I understand that lights are required by law
when operating a bicycle at night.
By initialing each item on the above checklist, I
have indicated my complete understanding of each of
these points, and I acknowledge my responsibilities
regardin~ the contents. As a parent, I also agree
to explaln the points on this checklist to my child.
X
Parent or Guardian Signature
~,?
TTACHMENT C
MEETING DATE: 12-12-9
ATTACHMENT C
!HAPPY HOLIDAYS/ FELICES DIAS DE FIESTA!
La Liga de Actividades policiaca les desean una Feliz Navidad, y
que disfruten sus bicicleta. Correr una bicicleta es muy
divertido, pero como cualquier actividad recreacional, accidentes
pueden ocurrir. Nosostros queremos que tengan precaucion y
corran sus bicicletas con cuidado. Favor de leer cada seccion de
este acuerdo cuidadosamente y hagan preguntas si tienen alguna
duda.
Favor
inicial:
ATTACHMENT C
1. Yo entiendo que cada ciclista (nino 0 adulto)
deber usar un casco al correr su bicicleta. Yo
prometo usar mi casco cuando al correr mi bicicleta.
2. Yo entiendo que esta bicicleta esta sujeta a
todos las leyes de la carretera, y yo tengo que
obedecer las leyes de transito.
3. Yo he sido instruido en como usar los frenos y
mecanismo de cambio, asi como el asiento y las
llantas.
4. Yo entiendo que los reflectores son instalados
para mi seguridad y no deben ser removidos.
5. Yo entiendo que la bicicleta que voy a recibir
es "usada", no es nueva, y no esta garantizada por
la Liga de Actividades policiaca 0 la Ciudad de
Chula vista.
6. Yo entiendo que mantenimiento es requerido para
mantener esta bicicleta operando apropiadamente y si
no la cuido, sera peligrosa al correr. Yo entiendo
que el mantenimiento incluye la inspeccion de frenos
y llantas. Yo tambien comprendo que mantener la
presion adecuada en las llantas es esential para la
seguridad de esta bicicleta. La presion recomendada
esta marcada en la llanta.
7. Yo entiendo que luces son requeridas por ley al
operar una bicicleta en la noche.
Al iniciar cada articulo, yo he indicado m~ completa
comprensi6n de cada punta y yo reconozco ml
responsabilidad con relacion al contenido. Como
padre/madre, yo tambien acepto explicar estos puntos
a mi hijo/hija.
X
Firma del Padre/Madre
~,Y'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
(
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution )~ 15' Amending the 1995-96
Legislative Program and Legislative Work Program.
Legislative Committee ~
sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager~
city Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes No-X-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The Legislative Program represents the city Council's consensus
position on items likely to be acted upon by the state Legislature,
Congress, or administrative agencies. By adopting a Legislative
Program at the beginning of each two-year legislative session,
Chula vista can take a proactive role in sponsoring, supporting, or
opposing bills related to the city's various legislative
priorities.
Midway through that two-year term, Council reconsiders the program
to add, amend or delete items as appropriate for the City's
changing priorities or to react to changes or new proposals in the
Legislature. Consideration of this item is preceded by a report
from the City's lobbyist, Advocation, Inc. under Special Orders of
the Day.
RECOMMENDATION: That the city Council approve the resolution
amending the 1995-96 Legislative Program and Legislative Work
Program.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: This report from the Legislative
Committee reflects their comments as well as input from the
department directors and Councilmembers (received as of 11/28/95).
DISCUSSION:
Backqround
The purpose of the Legislative Program (as instituted by Council
POlicy 300-01 in 1987) is to identify and adopt position statements
regarding a variety of issues which reflect the policy and
direction of the Council. This action sets guidelines which permit
staff to make timely responses consistent with Council's desires to
sponsor, support or oppose bills during the legislative process.
By taking action on a comprehensive program at the start and
midpoint of the legislative and congressional sessions, the City is
able to stake out a proactive position on issues and work with our
local representatives for the introduction of special legislation.
'"1 # I
-<<2-
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Presented in this report is an amended 1995-96 Legislative Program
and a Work Program to guide staff and our legislative consultant
(Advocation, Inc.) throughout the remainder of the session.
Leqislative Proqram
In general, the Legislative Program lays out the City's positions
in the following subject areas:
A. Bayfront/Redevelopment
B. Fiscal Support/Home Rule
C. General Government
D. Housing and Community Development
E. Economic Development
F. Land Use Planning
G. Environmental Protection
H. Public Employer/Employee Relations
I. Public Liability
J. Public Safety
K. Transportation
L. Recreation
M. Library
The Program is divided into two categories. Category I consists of
those items "which can be acted upon directly by staff with
concurrence of the Legislative Committee" (currently Mayor Horton,
the City Manager and city Attorney). Category II includes items on
which Council is interested in taking a more active role, and which
are therefore subject to formal Council action.
Procedurally,
Committee.
include:
Cateqorv I
Such items
is
are
administered by the Legislative
generally non-controversial, and
* Supporting additional state or federal funding for local
governments and/or Chula vista programs
* Opposing unfunded mandates
* Protecting City planning and land use authority
* Recommending reforms in various state and federal programs
via unanimous adoption of the program by the City Council, related
bills can be acted upon directly by the Legislative Committee, so
that the City's position can be communicated to legislators in the
quickest, most effective way. Notification of positions taken and
copies of any letters sent are then forwarded to the City Council
for information.
'''d-.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Cateqorv II contains items which have qeneral City Council support,
but on which there is still some debate among Council, and formal
City positions may depend upon the exact intent and wording of the
proposed bills. These items are to be actively monitored by the
Legislative Committee but are subject to formal Council
consideration before any actions may be taken to support or oppose.
Examples include:
Supporting efforts to:
* Consolidate state and/or federal environmental regulations
* Fund or construct sewage treatment or water supply
improvements.
* Support school, public safety and other bond financing
programs
Opposing efforts to:
* Enact additional mandates through the Brown Act.
Proposed Chanqes for 1996
The proposed amendments address issues raised during the first half
of the 1995-96 Legislative session, new City priorities, and new
priorities in Sacramento and Washington. The remainder of the
program is carried over from the 1995-96 Legislative Program, as
adopted by Council 2/7/95. In most cases, the City's priority
issues for 1996 (e.g. Veterans Home funding, Clean Water Act
exemption, supplemental subvention payments) are already included
in the Legislative Program and thus do not require any amendments.
A complete list of amendments is shown in Exhibit A, with additions
denoted by underline and deletions by strikeout. Individual
amendments are each accompanied by a brief justification for their
inclusion. Major amendments as proposed are listed below:
Supporting efforts to:
* Reallocate sales and property taxes to the benefit of local
governments, specifically via actions of the California
Constitutional Review commission, League of California cities
Resolution #23 (1995), and potential reform of Proposition 172
(public safety 1/2 cent sales tax) formulas.
* Select Chula Vista as the site of a new Uni versi ty of
California campus.
\--3
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
* Provide funding which would complete missing freeway links;
emphasis on SR-125 and 1-905. In this regard, establish the
Sweetwater segment of SR-125 as a project of statewide
significance.
* Obtain funding for the Chula Vista SMARTCommunity program,
al ternati ve fuels programs, telecenter programs or other
technology-based projects.
* Provide additional or enhanced state/federal or other
assistance to first-time homebuyers.
* In any proposals for utility restructuring, 1) preserve local
agency flexibility to be an active participant in aggregating
or serving local energy needs, and 2) encourage the
implementation of residential rate relief.
* Provide information on "source of power generation" to allow
consumer choice or incentives to purchase renewable energy.
Opposing efforts to:
* Limit cities' authority to enact and assess fees to recover
the full cost of providing user-specific services or to
recover the full costs of assessment district maintenance.
* Impose border crossing fees on the D.S./Mexico international
border (changed to "Oppose" from the City's previous "Watch"
position) .
with an up-to-date Legislative Program, staff will be better able
to communicate the City's interests to Congress and the State
Legislature. Most importantly, we will be able to communicate
that message to our local representatives and work for the
introduction or furtherance of legislation on Chula Vista's
priority issues.
When the state Legislature returns in January, they will once
again take up all of the two-year bills still pending. They will
also introduce new bills---among them Chula Vista-sponsored
proposals to approve bonding for the state veterans homes and
fully fund last year's supplemental subventions. We will also be
looking to take an early role in new enterprise zone legislation
to ensure that as eligibility criteria are re-written, they take
into account Chula vista's special opportunities such as the
high-tech/biotech zone. other areas for potential legislation
include freeway signage for the ARCO Training Center (depending
on the outcome of ongoing talks with CalTrans) and various City
technology initiatives.
I-~
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
The deadline to introduce new bills for 1996 is January 19.
Since this window of opportunity is a short one, Council is
encouraged to pass along at this time any additional issues on
which they are interested in pursuing a change in state law.
Work Proqram
In an effort to maximize the city's resources and impact
state level, the attached work program (Exhibit "B") has
developed to guide staff and our legislative consultant.
document is the result OI contacts with departments,
Councilmembers, and our legislative consultant. It serves
several purposes: A) as a work plan for staff and the
legislative consultant; b) narrows the scope of the legislative
area to specific issues of concern to Chula Vista; and, c)
serves as a valuable tool for setting the city's agenda and
evaluating our lobbying efforts in the state legislative process.
at the
been
This
The proposed work program is divided by category and priority.
Included is a description of each request and recommended follow-
up action. The priority assigned to projects is based on the
following criteria:
* Urgency (i.e. significant cost or need)
* Timing/political climate in Sacramento and washington
* Feasibility
As an example, maintenance of funding under the Federal Crime Act
of 1994 ($400,000) is a Priority 1 because of the amount of
funding at stake and the fact that the program is currently
threatened, either with drastic amendments or elimination.
Lower priority items range from those having a significant fiscal
impact but lesser political viability (e.g. sales tax realloca-
tion; Priority 2), to projects with low fiscal impact (e.g.
increases above CPI in assessment district costs; Priority 3), to
proposals which are currently dormant (e.g. binational airport)
and are no longer recommended as part of the active work program.
Amendments to this year's work program include:
* Higher priority for UCCV site selection
* Deletion of the Work Program elements for repeal of fish and
game fees and opposition to a border airport. (Although
these issues would not be part of the active Work Program,
they remains City positions within the overall Legislative
Program.)
(-s
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
* New priorities to reflect the new items in the Legislative
Program.
Updates of the work program will accompany staff's Legislative
Program Quarterly status Reports to keep Council informed of
progress toward these goals.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Although amendment of the Legislative Program and Work Program
for 1995-96 does not result in any cost to the City, the contract
with Advocation, Inc. for legislative consulting services, as
amended and approved by Council on 11/15/94, constitutes a
maximum annual cost of $74,040 inclusive of the base contract and
reimbursable expenses. This contract runs through the end of
1996. As the termination date approaches, staff will be
conducting a new request for proposals.
Although the full fiscal impacts of the City's legislative
efforts can be difficult to estimate (e.g. issues of land use
control, potential civil liability), they have yielded
substantial, concrete cost results. In 1995, Chula Vista's major
victories in Sacramento included:
1995: POSITIVE FISCAL IMPACTS
Issue Actual Revenue Comments
Veterans Home $840,000 For site planning,
environmental work
Nature Center $400,000 As accepted from
exhibits/seawater Coastal Conservancy @
flow-through 12/5 Council meeting
Fuel Cell buses: Part of City
Defense Conversion $1,000,000 partnership with
Petroleum Funds $500,000 SAIC/Ballard
Aluminum Air Also a partnership with
Battery: SAIC
Petroleum Funds $250,000
TOTAL REVENUE: $2,990,000
l-b
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Fiscal items the City has opposed (some of which are still
pending final decisions) include:
1995: POTENTIAL/AVERTED NEGATIVE IMPACTS
Issue Potential Cost Comments
Community $1.08 million/year Cuts proposed of as much
Development Block as 50%. Defeated for
Grants 1995-96
SB 160 $1-2 million/year Two-year bill, pending
(Transportation in Assembly policy
CIP $) committee
Medicare mandates $210,000/year Conference Committee
budget text eliminated
this mandate, but the
President vetoed the
bill on 12/7/95. The
issue is likely to
resurface.
Telecommunications Up to $410,000/year Amended favorably; long
reform term impact could still
erode franchise
revenues; Pending in
Conference Committee
SB 323, AB 142 $2.4 million system Would limit cost-
(GIS/public recovery potential; Two-
records) year bills, pending in
Assembly policy
committee
SB 1066 (school Up to $2 million/year Jeopardized long-term
funding/City general tax revenue.
taxation Defeated in Assembly.
authority)
TOTAL LOSS $5+ million/year
OPPOSED/AVERTED:
,--1
Page 8, Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Finally, as we look ahead to 1996, the city will be pursuing
funding in the following areas:
1996: PRIORITY ISSUES
Issue Potential Comments
Revenue/Savings
Veterans Home State bonds need to be
State Bonds $12,000,000 approved prior to
Federal Bonds $22,000,000 federal application in
August. Senator Peace
-' and Assemblyman Baldwin
supporting.
Clean Water $130 million "Equivalency" would not
Exemption (savings) require a 5-year renewal
or water reclamation.
Congressman Bilbray
authoring.
Supplemental $243,000 Corrects state under-
Subventions funding from 1994-95.
Chula vista sponsoring.
AB 230, AB 1436 $610,000 Would reimburse fire
(emergency departments for first
response) responder medical care.
TOTAL POTENTIAL $34,853,000 NOTE: Total does not
REVENUE: include Clean Water
savings
Attachments:
1. Resolution
2. Exhibit A: Legislative Program, Proposed 1996 Amendments
3. Exhibit B: Work Program, Proposed 1996 Amendments
4. Information: Letter from San Marcos
5. Information: Letter from Palm springs
A:\(Al13)\LEGPGDEC.113
JY
l-~
RESOLUTION NO.
/8?5/
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING THE 1995-96 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM AND
LEGISLATIVE WORK PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Council Policy 300-01, dated January 1987, provides for the
adoption of a City Legislative Program; and
WHEREAS, the Legislative Program represents the City Council's
consensus position on items likely to be acted upon by the State Legislative,
Congress, or administrative agencies; and,
WHEREAS, by adopting a Legislative Program at the beginning of each
two-year legislative session, Chula Vista can take a proactive role in
sponsoring, supporting, or opposing bills related to the City's various
legislative priorities; and
WHEREAS, midway through that two-year term, Council reconsiders the
program to add, amend or delete items as appropriate for the City's changing
priorities or to react to changes or new proposals in the Legislature; and
WHEREAS, said amended Legislative Program and Work Program are
recommended for adoption by the Legislative Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby amend the 1995-96 Legislative Program in the form
presented thereto as set forth in Exhibit "An.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby amend the
1995-96 Legislative Work Program in the form presented thereto as set forth in
Exhibit "B".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff and the Legislative Committee are
hereby authorized to implement these programs.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~
Sid Morris
Assistant city Manager
c: Irs\legprog
7-g
Attachment #1
fi
il.J-r. I -,
__J..L i/---,Y\.-' /
RESOLUTION NO.
;ci/{f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING THE 1995-96 LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM AND
LEGISLATIVE WORK PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Council Policy 300-01, dated January 1987, provides for the
adoption of a City Legislative Program; and
WHEREAS, the Legislative Program represents tne City Council's
consensus position on items likely to be acted upon by the State Legislative,
Congress, or administrative agencies; and,
WHEREAS, by adopting a Legislative Program at the beginning of each
two-year legislative session, Chula Vista can take a proactive role in
sponsoring, supporting, or opposing bills related to the City's various
legislative priorities; and
WHEREAS, midway through that two-year term, Council reconsiders the
program to add, amend or delete items as appropriate for the City's changing
priorities or to react to changes or new proposals in the Legislature; and
WHEREAS, said amended Legislativr Program and Work Program are
recommended for adoption by the Legislative Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby amend the 1995-96 Legislative Program in the form
presented thereto as set forth in Exhibit "A".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby amend the
1995-96 Legislative Work Program in the form presented thereto as set forth in
Exhibit "B".
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that staff and the Legislative Committee are
hereby authorized to implement these programs.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Sid Morris
Assistant City Manager
~
c: \ra\legprog
7-'
DRAFT 1995-96 CHULA VlST A LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM
EXHIBIT "A"
(Attachment 2)
I. LEGISLATION WHICH CAN BE ACTED UPON DIRECTLY BY STAFF WITH CONCURRENCE OF
LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE.
A. Bayfront - Redevelopment.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Provide funding for urban waterfront restoration projects and the enhancement of the
waterfront within the southern San Diego Bay.
b. Provide additional funding for the Chula Vista Nature Center e:MHeits from the
Environmental License Plate (ELP) Fund or other state/federal/re2ional sources.
(NOTE: With approval of the $400,000 in ELP funding in the 1995-96 budget, the
focus for Nature Center funding needs is shifting to general/operating costs.)
c. Amend the State Community Development law so as to allow a jurisdiction to
combine tax increment from all projects for use in a specific project.
d. Adjust Redevelopment Agency members pay (more than $30 per meeting, up to 4
times per month).
e. Seek Port District-State Lands Commission reorganization of tidelands boundaries in
cooperation with Rohr and bayfront developers in an effort to make better use of land
available for development.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Discontinue State supplemental subvention for redevelopment agencies.
b. Further control tax increments in redevelopment projects.
B. Fiscal Support - Home Rule.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Permit retention and control by local governments of a greater portion of revenue
generated by Federal, State, and local taxes.
b. Require the Federal government and State to reimburse local governments for all
mandated cost or regulatory actions or which allow cities to cease performance of
unfunded mandates.
c. Retain maximum flexibility in the administration of Article XIIIB of the state
constitution (the Gann Initiative--Iocal expenditures are limited by population growth
and CPI factors.)
d. Expand local autonomy or the home rule authority to govern municipal affairs.
1
e. Enhance the quality of urban life by funding the creation, improvement, or expansion
of parks, libraries-8:96, community services and infrastructure. such as road. flood
control. etc.
(NOTE: Adds additional funding categories.)
f. Provide state/federal funding for construction or renovation of public buildings such
as community centers, libraries, civic center, etc.
g. Expand the sales tax base to include mail order sales and home shopping sources.
h. Provide that cities and school districts can issue general obligation debt with a
majority vote instead of the current 2/3 vote requirement.
I. Adjust the unitary tax roll procedures so that the jurisdiction in which major utility
projects are constructed receives substantially more fiscal benefit than is currently
provided for.
J. Provide for fiscal reform in the form of greater reliability, certainty, and equitability
of state funding for local governments.
k. Reallocate sales and orooertv taxes to the benefit of local l!Overnments.
specificallv via actions of the California Constitutional Review Commission.,
Leai!ue of California Cities Resolution #23 (1995). and potential reform of
Proposition 172 (oublic safetv 1/2 cent sales tax) formulas.
(NOTE: Per previous Council direction. Also anticipates potential action by the
CCRC, League and other advocates of sales tax reform in favor of cities.)
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Restrict or allocate the use of Transient Occupancy Tax revenues.
b. Exempt residential users from the Utility Users' Tax.
c. Reallocate fines and forfeitures.
d. Repeal Gas Tax exemption for local agencies.
e. Reallocate sales and property tax revenue to the detriment of local governments.
f. Limit cities' authority to enact or impose mobilehome or residential rent control.
g. Limit cities' authority to enact and assess fees to recover the full cost of providing
user-specific services or to recover the full costs of assessment district
maintenance.
(NOTE: Aside from AB 1600, which placed significant limits on assessment of
development fees, several bills regulate or propose to regulate when cities may charge
fees for services. Examples include booking fee legislation and SB 323, attempting
to broaden the Public Records Act.)
h. Infringe on home rule authority to act on local budget and fiscal matters or other
municipal affairs.
2-
-,
1. Overhaul the California Public Records Act in a way that would: restrict cities'
control of the means of access to information assets (e.g. computer databases,
proprietary software), limit cost recovery for providing such access, or violate the
privacy of the parties from whom the data was collected.
C. General Government.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Subject the State Legislature to the same requirements for public meetings, advance
agenda, etc. as currently imposed on cities through the Brown Act.
b. Eliminate the State's requirement which mandates Project Committee and/or Boards
& Commissions members to complete a fInancial disclosure statement.
c. Free the sample ballot of campaign rhetoric and distortion.
d. Linlit to 1 %. th~_amount of administrative costs the Board of Equalization may charge
to administer local sales taxes such as San Diego's 1/2 cent sales taxes for
transportation and justice facility construction.
e. Allow gambling on international cruises, regardless of the number of U.S. stops.
f. Facilitate increases in Open Space District assessments by an amount not to exceed
the Consumer Price Index (CPI) or hil!:her if increased costs are beyond the control
of local slOvernments (e.S!. imoosed by water districts).
(NOTE: Current restrictions on special assessments, and other "reauthorization" or
protest proposals, such a., ACA 45, infringe on the City's ability to recover the costs
of water utility increases and other effects of inflation.)
it.. Select Chula Vista as the site of a new University of California camous.
(NOTE: This item has been included in the past as a part of the legislative work
program, but lately had been of a lesser priority as the UC system stalled in its
designation of a Central Valley campus site. Per Council direction, this will be a
priority issue in 1996.)
h. Locate freeway sil!:nal!:e for the ARCO Traininl!: Center alonl,! Interstate 5.
(NOTE: This item is currently being pursued with CaITrans at the staff level.
Legislative authorization would only be considered if these efforts prove
unsuccessful. )
i.. Provide fundilU!: for the Chula Vista SMARTCommunitv orol!:ram. alternative
fuels prOl!:rams. telecenter DrOl!:rams. and other technolol!:v-based proiects.
(NOTE: Although most outside funding will likely continue to be from grant or city
funding sources, some "demonstration project" hardware purchases may be possible
through special legislation.)
3
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Mandate district elections in all cities and/or school districts.
b. Limit: imposition of franchise fees, taxes, or other compensation for use of public
right-of-way; local rate regulation; operational oversight; or right-of-way controls on
cable television operators and other telecommunications providers and utilities.
c. Bailout Orange County's investment crisis with state taxpayer funds
d. Imoose border crossill2 fees on the U.S.lMexico international border.
(NOTE: Previously listed as a Watch status. New position recommended in light of
Council opposition to S 754 and S 269.)
D. Housing & Community Development.
1.
Support efforts tc?:. _ ""-' , _ . _
a. Exclude redevelopment agencies from competitive bidding statues and fair market
value restrictions for resale of public properties to permit joint development of public
facilities by private developers upon fmdings of public benefit.
b. Extend the following three Federal Low-Income Housing Programs:
1. Mortgage Credit Certificate Program for low/moderate income home buyers;
11. Tax Credits for low income housing programs; and,
111. Continue funding for HUD HOME and HOPE Programs.
c. Change Federal banking regulations to exempt banks from having to count fmancing
or Letters of Credit for low income housing in their risk capital limit calculations.
d. Finance and develop additional state Veterans home(s) and site such a home in Chula
Vista.
e. Provide additional or enhanced state/federal or other assistance to first-time
homebuvers.
(NOTE: Per Council input on 12/5/95.)
2. Support principles for housing element reform legislation as recommended by the SANDAG
Housing Element Advisory Committee and approved by the SANDAG Board.
(NOTE: As supported in 1995 re: AB 1715 -- City supported 4/12/95.)
3. Oppose efforts to:
a. Grant the State or Federal government approval or veto authority in the
implementation of local redevelopment and rehabilitation projects.
b. Prohibit any state agency from making subventions, financing, insurance or any other
kind of assistance, available to any city or county which has in effect any rent control
measure.
4
---
E. Economic Development.
Support efforts to:
1. Enhance California's overall business climate.
2. Provide funding, programmatic support or other assistance to the Border Environmental
Commerce Alliance, Border Environmental Technology Resource Center, and Border
Environmental Business Cluster, and to the Chula Vista High TechiBiotech Zone, proposed
contract biotech pharmaceutical pilot manufacturing facility, and other Chula Vista economic
development initiatives.
3. Establish a California Trade and Commerce Agency-sponsored R\i6tB8SS Ew:ireBHl8Btel
.A-.ssistaoee CeBter (R};).C) satellite faeility Office of Pennit Assistance or other liaison office
in Chula Vista, possibly at the Border Environmental Technology Resource Center.
(NOTE: Change based on structure of current Trade and Commerce efforts.)
4. Continue or enhance funding of:
a. California Trade and Commerce Agency
b. California Defense Adiustment Matchilll!: Grant prol!rant
b. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (ED A)
c. U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Economic Develooment Initiative
and other business assistance programs
e. Export assistance, defense conversion, technolOl!v transfer. business incubators. job
training and other economic development programs for which Chula Vista businesses
would qualify and secure such funding for Chula Vista projects and/or businesses.
(NOTE: Changes per additional funding sources; individual poSitions of support subject to
Chula Vista eligibility for funds.)
5. Create or enhance targeted business assistance programs (such as state Enterprise Zones or
federal Empowerment Zones) with eligibility criteria that would include Chula Vista.
6. Create or enhance programs which support international cross-border commerce.
7. Increase the flexibility of the use of HUD Community Development Block Grant funds as they
relate to general economic development projects and programs.
8. Increase flexibility of the California redevelopment laws as they relate to general economic
development programs.
9. Continue authorization for the Community Reinvestment Act and additional leI!islation
to maintain accountability for lenders as relates to their small businesses develonment
Dl'OSlrantS.
(NOTE: Congress is considering elimination of many of the CRA local investment criteria.)
:5:
F. Land Use Planning.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Strengthen local government's powers and capacity to prepare, adopt and implement
fiscal plans and programs for orderly growth, development, beautification, and
conservation of their planning areas.
b. Are consistent with the doctrine of "home rule" and the local exercise of police
powers, through the planning and zoning processes, over local land use.
c. Expand the land use, conservation, and growth management policies of municipalities
to the unincorporated territories within their spheres of influence.
d. Broaden local government's power to require developers and subdividers to provide
the on-site and off-site facilities and infrastructure needed by their projects.
e. Maximize the@.llthority of the City to exercise local control over general plan
decisions.
f. Require special districts to adopt facility master plans which are consistent with City
and County general plans and growth management programs, and to adopt five year
capital improvement programs and fmancing plans which are consistent with their
facility master plans.
g. Permit processing/provide funding for a Master EIR for biomedicalfbiotech industrial
development in Chula Vista.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Abridge local government's ability to effectively plan, or regulate local land use
including: amendments to the laws governing local agency formation (LAFCO);
legislation which would fmancially overburden local governments in their efforts to
amend planning policy, regulate land use through removal of incompatible
developments, redevelop blighted areas, or annex territories which are within the
spheres of influence.
b. Site a regional or bi-national airport in the Otay Mesa area.
G. Environmental Protection.
1. Support efforts to
a. Require an environmental impact report (EIR) for large projects/utility mergers.
b. Obtain funding for wetlands and riparian habitat acquisition and restoration, and
funding for acquisition of land needed for multi-species habitat conservation planning.
c. Fund planning and land acquisition for Natural Community Conservation plans created
by AB 2172 (Kelley) (1991).
d. Obtain funding for a comprehensive environmental management planning effort for
San Diego Bay.
6
"" i " l'
e. Prohibiting the granting of new leases for oil and gas development in state-owned
coastal waters off of San Diego County.
f. Encourage the installation of water conserving fixtures in existing residences and
businesses.
g. Obtain funding for water conservation to include the construction of reclaimed water
distribution systems, and fixture and irrigation system renovation and retrofit.
h. Develop an ongoing, reliable statewide funding source to acquire, develop and/or
maintain open space, greenbelts, rivers, streams and trails.
1. Expand and utilize existing landfills in the county.
J. Encourage post-consumer recycled products use in manufacturing, residential and
business applications through incentives, education. promotions, etc.
k. Truth in la~liI}g efforts which identifyap(oduct's regional recyclability, and its post-
consumer recycled content.
l. Require "disposal warning" labeling on household hazardous materials, which reduce
the use of toxic materials, and which promote nontoxic alternatives to present
materials.
m. Require minimum content standards for use of recycled materials in manufacturing
processes.
n. Provide funding for environmental enterprise incentives. soecificallv Recvc1illl!:
Market Development Zones.
(NOTE: Statewide RMDZ authorization expires in 1997.)
o. RSfttiQieriz,e Continue authorization for bottle billle2islation. such as AB 1467,
Ch. 1259, Statutes of 1993 and SB 1178. Ch. 624. Statutes of 1995, providing state
payments to agencies which operate curbside recycling programs.
(NOTE: State support under this law helps subsidize the city's curbside recycling
program. SB 1178 extends various provisions through 1/1/99, but the form of the
bottle bill program and its support for local curbside recycling programs is a
continuing issue.)
IL. Expand the bottle bill or other advance disoosal fees to provide recvc1illl!:
incentives and fundilll!: for other materials. such as liouor and fruit iuice bottles
and used motor oil.
(NOTE: Additional bottle bill designations and deposits would increase recovery of
recyclables and assist in cost recovery of curbside collection.)
iL. Eliminate plastic and e:lass processilll!: or handlilll!: fees.
(NOTE: These fees are assessed to manufacturers rather than consumers and thus do
not provide an incentive for consumers to recycle. None of this funding supports
local curbside programs.)
.~
r... Enact a statewide landfill ban on desilmated recvclables.
(NOTE: Such a ban would encourage development of new feedstock capacity and
strengthen/stabilize long term markets.)
s. Reauthorize the Federal Water Resources Act, including provisions to raise the
reimbursement limit and provide reimbursement for construction expenditures.
(NOTE: With a revised reimbursement limit, Chula Vista could be eligible for up to
an additional $5 million for further improvements along the Telegraph Canyon Creek
flood control channel.)
t. Modify the Clean Water Act to give the City of San Diego an exemption rather than
a waiver from the requirement of upgrading the Point Loma treatment plant to a
secondary treatment facility or providing reclaimed water.
(N aTE: Existing mandates carry a potential cost of $1. 7 + billion to San Diego
CO!:l!lty~:apprQ~i.mately $130 _milliop tQ c;hu111. Vista. Reclaimed water would add a
cost of $10 per residence per month. An exemption from these requirements would
provide greater/more lasting cost protection than a waiver.)
u. Limit environmental mitigation requirements for construction and maintenance of
drainage facilities in urban areas esoeciallv in develooed neil!hborhoods.
(NOTE: At present, the city may be required to purchase mitigation land amounting
to as much as four times the project size. With projects in developed neighborhoods,
mitigation requirements can require more complex drainage improvements and the
dedication of larger portions of the property owner's lot.)
v. Repeal AB 3158, Ch. 1706, Statutes of 1990 (Fish and Game fees)
(NOTE: This law requires all project applicants and public agencies subject to CEQA
to pay the Department of fish and Game a filing fee of $1,250 for projects requiring
negative declarations and $850 for those requiring Environmental Impact Reports.
Although the Department has ceased collection of the fees due to a recent court
decision, the fees are still on the books.)
w. Grant local agencies authority to file appeals with the State Water Quality Control
Board (SWQCB) concerning actions by a Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB).
x. In any oroDOsals for utility restructurill2. 1) oreserve local W!encv flexibility to
be an active oarticioant in W!l!re2ati~ or servill2 local enemy needs. and 2)
encounlI!e the implementation of residential rate relief.
(NOTE: The California Public Utilities Commission and Legislature are considering
a drastic restructuring for the state utilities industry. Cities such as Palm Springs
have been exploring the concept of acting as a "utilityaggregator" and playing a more
active role in the wake of the deregulation to come. Although no such action is
recommended for Chula Vista as yet, it is important that local interests be considered
and home mle flexibility preserved as the new industry rules are written.)
8
~'
L. Provide information on "source of DOwer ~eneration" to aUow consumer choice
or incentives to ourchase renewable enel1!Y.
(NOTE: In furtherance of Chula Vista's commitment to development and
commercialization of alternative fuels, it is recommended the public be given the
opportunity to choose their power sources in a restructured utility industry based on
environmental criteria, and that, if appropriate, incentives be created for such
choices. )
z. Advance the use of low and zero emission vehicles throW!h market incentives.
credits. rebates. oublic/orivate oartnershios and other innovative solutions.
(NOTE: The Legislature is considering changes to the current ZEV regulations for
manufacturers. The above position would restate the City's commitment to a cleaner
environment via promotion of alternative fuels.)
H. Public Employer-Employee Relations.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Protect the rights of City's to establish conditions of employment, including hours,
wages, employee benefits, the meet and confer process, appeal procedures, and
management rights.
b. Reform California Workers' Compensation Program to reduce public costs and tighten
restrictions.
c. Amend the Fair Labor Standards Act to ensure that executive, administrative and
professional employees still qualify as exempt.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Impose restrictions on the scope and authority of charter cities to control their own
health plans or retirement systems.
b. Mandate the inclusion of local government employees in the Social Security System
and/or Medicare.
c. Increase workers' compensation benefits without also making needed reforms.
d. Mandate changes, impose limitations, and/or other benefit plans, wages, hours, or
working conditions which are properly determined through the meeting and confer
process.
e. Mandate mental health coverage in group health insurance plans.
f. Reduce local control over public employee disputes and impose regulations of an
outside agency (such as PERS).
g. Prohibit an employer from testing an employee or applicant for employment for
iUegal substances.
9
I. Public Liability.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Change the legal principal of "joint and several liability" to protect the City against
"deep pocket" liability.
b. Reinforce public entity design and discretionary act immunity.
c. Prohibit recovery by a plaintiff for injury where those injuries were caused as a result
of avoiding a police pursuit.
d. Enact tort liability reform
(NOTE: To minimize governmental financial exposure from frivolous lawsuits, both
the state legislature and Congress have introduced various tort reform proposals. In
particular, these proposals can provide protection to local law enforcement and
dispatch . perso~el. )
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Further erode government immunity.
b. Force the City to accept risks it would not normally accept in the ordinary course of
business, such as in the case of mandating acceptance of below-grade or low-grade
sureties on performance bonds or labor and materials bonds.
(NOTE: This was done recently in Civil Code ~995.660 and .670. Such mandates
can result from special interest legislation from insurance or financial industries.)
J. Public Safety.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Strengthen present State and Federal laws which give local governments the power
to further restrict or regulate prostitution.
b. Increase penalties for the manufacture or sale for profit of dangerous drugs including
but not limited to PCP, methamphetamine and narcotics.
c. Prohibit the sale and brandishing of replica or facsimile firearms.
d. Toughen drunk driving laws, penalties or enhancements.
e. Require notification be given to local law enforcement prior to the release of a
prisoner in that County/City.
f. Strengthen the City's ability to regulate the public display of material which is
harmful to minors.
g. Permit forfeiture of all assets of drug dealers which would then be committed to drug
enforcement programs.
10
h. Allow tagging (i.e. serialized identification) of beer kegs in an effort to reduce under
age consumption of alcoholic beverages.
I. Permits the staffing of Photo Radar posts by properly trained non-sworn personnel.
J. Permits the issuance of a photo radar citation to trigger the arrest warrant process.
k. Provide greater authority for police or other local agencies to control graffiti,
curfews, juvenile crime and alcoholic beverage control.
I. Provide funding for local police staffmg, programs or equipment.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Preempt local ordinances concerning Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.
b. Overturn or reduce the funding for items contained in the federal Crime Act of 1994.
(NOTE: Congress has expressed some interest in rewriting the 1994 Crime Bill,
particularly the prevention portions of it such as funding for midnight basketball
programs. Current proposals---HR 3 and S 3---would recast the Crime Bill as state
or local block grants, with final funding yet to be determined. Approximate funds
at stake for Chula Vista: $116,000)
K. Public WorkslTransportation.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Enact clean-up legislation related to transportation funding.
b. Provide funding which would complete missing freeway links; emphasis on SR-I25
and 1-905. In this rei!ard. establish the Sweetwater seIDl1ent of SR-125 as a
proiect of statewide sil!nificance.
(NOTE: Private toll-road funding for 1-905 may provide a needed boost to complete
this transit corridor and take additional traffic off Chula Vista surface streets leading
to 1-805.)
c. Fund local transportation projects.
d. Reduce municipal costs associated with CALTRANS projects.
e. Amend the Transit Development Act (TDA) to allow bus advertising revenue to be
earmarked for discounted youth transit passes or other non-traditional programs.
f. Allow local agencies flexibility in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act to provide the greatest benefit to the local disabled population, rather than
committing scarce resources to achievement of 2 % maximum sidewalk and driveway
slopes.
11
L. Recreation.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Provide state/federal funding for City programs in: the arts; child care; gang
prevention and diversion, and drug prevention and intervention in a community-based
recreation setting.
M. Library.
l. Support efforts to:
a. Provide for continued funding of: the state Public Library Fund (PLF), California
Library Services Act (CLSA), Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA),
Libra" Services and TechnoJoi!Y Act (LST A)~ literacy programs, library
construction and renovation, and access to new technol()~ies.
(N aTE: Changes are recommended to recognize changes in law but also to add
generic support for the ever-growing field of library technologies.)
D. LEGISLATIVE ITEMS REQUIRING FORMAL COUNCIL ACTION.
A. Bayfront - Redevelopment.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Consolidated control and administration of environmental regulations and
enforcement; presently in Department of Interior; Corps of Engineers; Department
of Commerce; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA);
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
b. Coordinate Federal Coastal Zone Management Act, Environmental Protection Agency
(EP A) regulations and State Coastal Zone Act, in an effort to eliminate duplicate
efforts.
c. Enhance business attraction and retention (Governor's Program of Competitiveness).
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Reduce the number of San Diego Unified Port District Commissioners and/or require
commissioners to be elected members of the City Council which they represent.
B. Emironmental Protection.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Approve the coordination of State, Federal and local agency responses to air quality
control, energy, and environmental protection.
b. Seek funds for facilities to capture and treat the flow of raw sewage entering San
Diego from Tijuana.
12
c. Encourage development of environmentally sound techniques for treating hazardous
waste to reduce its volume and eliminate any toxicity.
d. Provide funding to study the water quality/toxic pollution in San Diego Bay.
e. Encourage development of water resources facilities and make improvements to the
delta.
f. Obtain financial assistance at the federal level to construct new and upgnule existing
secondary treatment facilities in San Diego County.
2. Watch efforts to:
a. Favor/reauire utilities to allow "wheelilll!:" (delivery of electricity. 2as or water
Durchased from other sources) to maior users or cities.
(NOTE: Wheeling could potentially allow for 1) greater water availability and fewer
constraints on 1~1 development and 2) more competitive, lower cost utilities. Staff
recommends a close watch be put on related proposals such as Imperial Valley water
transfers, CPUC free-market restructuring, etc., with formal positions to be subject
to further Council input.)
C. General Government.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Fund school facility construction programs.
b. To clarify the authority of school districts to impose facilities fees established by CH
887, Statutes of 1986 (AB 2926).
c. Authorize cities to establish special assessments for specified local services, subject
to approval by the local electorate.
(NOTE: Special property assessment legislation is frC<}uently introduced to provide
additional options for funding such items as police services and equipment, library
services, and business district improvements.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Impose greater restrictions on local government through amendment of the Brown
Act.
3. ''vateR efforts te:
8. Impese I:ler~er er8ssiftg fees eft t8e U. S ..'Mexiee iBteRl8tiefttll gef~er.
(NOTE: See Section I.C.2.d. above.)
13
D. Housing and Community Development.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Develop Federal and State participation and financial support for creative programs
to provide adequate housing for the elderly, handicapped, and low-income persons
throughout the community.
b. Maintain and create tax incentives for private revitalization of existing commercial.
industrial and housing resources where such assistance benefits the City.
E. Public Safety.
1. Support efforts to:
a. Increase municipal funding for the removal of abandoned vehicles.
2. Oppose efforts to:
a. Change/remove date and/or shift to the employer the burden of proof related to
firefighter cancer presumption.
b. Shift to the employer the burden of proof related to Public Safety AIDS presumption.
a:\legpgmlx,96r
14
.
~
a
z
S
~
5
~
1'"'1
~
~
~
~~
~I
<i
~~
00-
~~
~8
Ui:
~
~
5:
e::
j
Ea
~
~ s
s Q,j
rJ:J:;:
Q,j Q,j
.c >
--;:
>-'ell
,e-
"0 .!a
," ~
.::~
.$ '-
.... Cl
:5 ~
=-
t~
,e~
Q,j Q.
> e
ell Cl
.c CJ
.c ell
.S::! ""
.c~
~ =
e~
Q,j....
.... .-
.- .c
= .-
._ .c
ell ~
t::~
~ ~
Q,jrJ:J
"0.
::-
v =
= .S
.- ....
.... Q.
Cl e
= t
~ a
"O~
:;: =
~.=
~ Cl
._ N
.1:: ..
"" Q,j
.S ~
a Cl .
"'~ i .~
- ....
.... :: CJ
.u = =
Q,j ~ 5
.c . ~
.... ~-
>-. . ell
-Q,j....
... "-"" r.I.)
; ~ ell
= 'v .c
'f: = t
c.Q,j....
1)1)....
~ ell....
~ l1 ~
C.cCl
t'OU
.... "" Q,j
"" Cl >
~E':
CJ ell
[IJ :i
.... ~ ~
-=6~
~ u Q,j
= "',C
..... t .....
rJ:J::.c
.. ~ .~
~-.c
Eo- -~ ~
o ~ =
Z....lCl
m
::>
~
1;;
Q..
::>
~
o
-l
-l
o
u..
:>-
.1:
o
.t:
e::L.
....
o
~
~~
f-<m
ul-Il
<;:J
e::L.O
~I-Il
_et:
z
o
(::
e::L.
;2
U
(I)
u.l
o
B
u.l
a
~
Q..
>-
~
o
@
~
u
m ... ~
~ Q) c.E CQ g '-= 00
.... 8 u.. m N "'0 ell
.-a '5 B .....l;.;;; ~ ] :>- ~ ...
OQ)ZJ :>~u< r-:~<::l
"'ug 8'" ~lOuCl.c
"'::le: Z;(Ov4Set:::OI-IlIO
u ~ Cl) V) 00 ~ ~ .-::: "0 ~
~ ~ ..IC ::l .5 ~ ~ : ~ ~ 6 ~ ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .:a b ~
o 0 .c < .s! .~ ~ ~ m:'9 5 Z ...-0
=~-- c:.c:let:"'O,-,ell~ o~
",-.. ~-i::f Q)o 010-; .... g
i. ~ ~ E ~ ~ e::L. : ~ .~ ~ ~ ] ]
] ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ :l ; ~ ~ ~ .~ ~
.c e::L. g.... e::L. 0 m OO.J< S e::L. l.L. .c:l =
Q) 0 ~ ~ e::L. "'0 '-'.5 .... ..; e::L. < ... ~
S'-'::3 s~j~~] fr~et: ~!3
m!"'l.c"''-'elllO~='''O,-,I-Il...~
~ - @
:>-)(ell-;
.c l5: g ...
~...,g=o-~~~
~ Q) "'0 .9 .. B 8 =
.2~;.c= 5 = <Ii go.~
u .E ~'I:'~ .~ g v ~
-5 Q)t;-U=6)>
i;j B g.... 6. ::l Q)] .c
>:l...~0~6)......~
:;>-(1) ~_~.... ....~'-'
00'-" ~ '"
c:l S< e 1.;;:'900]
:.g U ~ ,..., .... = ell = !:I 0
... < . - (0 .- _ ;a "'" u
..z 8<'" ...~c:l-~
"'0 Q)8 !"'l ...::s! B -?:'.- ~ - - '"
~ ~ ._ ~ 0 ::l C. S< ~ Q)' 0\ ~ 5
c ~u'" 1<0 8::1~ 8"'0 B ::I''::
lU'" e!"'l (0. .ell"'U
I:~ 'c.NIOr1J8";ZJt;=Q)
::I ... U C. ~ ~ 5 10 fr ~ c': =s
U -= .5 ~ < - .c ~ "'0 u 0 0 u
'"
.~
...
ell
~
-;
Q)
::l
fi c ~
> .0_ L-.
~ ... r-
.....8~o<D 5
~Bl.L..cell;l 8
~]~~~g. vS
u .:; c: _ Q) U I< < -
cQ)1!I-8= a>
~ .- .~ c:l J:l !-< (08 ~
-.....:lQ)-..... ,..,
... e:>- = B .t: .....
u Q ~ Q) t: .~ ~ u 0
c ... u - 'l.l "'... ';:::l
.... .w :.a c.. g. ;; ct1 ....... C
o.E (0 go e ... .~ ~ 8
.5 ~:> m e::L. ~ U ~ 8
:l .... l.L. I-Il
c]
.; u
~ .5
~
o
t:
<'
Cl
t.1.l
'-'
v
<(
i
_ 8
e e
Q) Q)
~ ~
00
ell
- "'0
.E ;
U Q)
~ .-= :::E .8
'" Q) N
g,J .-= - B
ellt:l"'~
= 0 ... _ = .
~.c:l~ ~.~ t'
......"'~o.!!=
1064 .. CI.:I ::J
o 8 .-= .- ;
e::L. Q) .:g ~......
e::L....8.J<-=
;:J ~ 00 .... :>-....
ceod~lii.c]
~~~~~g
0\ !II'-.:o: .... "2
i;'l > ... > ~
l%l.... e 0 e ...
< :> c. ~ c..5
.8
o
...
o .
c"'5
CI.:I ~ ~ ''5
005;~.s
=''::=Q)",
= .() .~ .900 5
.... .. .. ... = n
.... C. ell .- ~
t;"20-"':>-
-;; ~ ""'.~ 8. as
"''''8:~c.v
<.5 ell _ 0 "'0
] "'0 =
... ; .9 00
ss 5 _ t) .,S VJ
C ,_ ell 2 ell.c
'= = .... -- Q;> 0
"'.= Q) '" ......,
Q)t:~=O
... ... 0 ..8
~N.c:lU'(;j'!"'l
.~!"'l ... Q) "'0 I
o ~.- ... !3 8
C::i;j~~~N
ell
]
U
.....
o
~
c.
o
V
~
~
o
:I:
~
B Q)
(0 ...
:> 'm
2 1!1
:l .~
m:>
EXHIBIT IIBII
"'0
,-..;
~Cl(O~Q)~:>-
1_ ~ rJJ._ u._ .....
;..: Cl:.E t' = .c:l 'C
et:ZUelle~,g
::r:t.1.l!3>~e:'"
:::E.E:B5.....;
]:..(-:>-u Q) ~
= m !.:l'1: c ~ ::I
~ m..9 0'- ~ "'0
et:t.1.l...-=00~;
o.....:l ~ ::l.5 c._
e::L.Z'"od.:o:0,-..
e::L.~e~S...lii
;:Jt.1.lC.~~B:;
tl)tI)~~ ...==
'-' 0 ... 0 ~.~ (0
N... = T as ,;:..
lI')-lU......
1Oe::L. 1:~000"'O
m e- B .t: .g u ;
...
Q)
. .c
~.~"O ~~
~ .... "'0 C. ~ ell
B;:;Bell~
ell 0 ~..IC ~.-
= .... 0 0_
.- Q) 0 ... ... ell
'E~~",~g
8 11l < .~ '60-
u ~ Z '(3 ~ '0
tJ.) e QS
..... :;l"'Q)
o = = ...
~ ~8t;
0.5 e..... u
......- )( 0:':: f:)O
] ~ .~ ~ .g .5
C ..c:l 0 c..c:l
(Oo~-"'2!
"O~e:]~(O
e::L.~.....=0'::
:>-
c ~...
o ~ Q)
~.= ~o5
:.E~ 90.
o 8. Q) ~ "'0 .~ ,-..
~ 8 i;j .~ ;::E 5
~ .... ~ '';: ''';:
.....8-;so::l.!!
o Q "'-::l
= ... 0 .. ell ~ t:lIl
o~-~~;(O
'-8 "0 >,.~ go '" ~
."'..... ~ i!: ~ "'0
8. 0 ..' ~ 5 :'9 ~
8 = ~ O'm > ~
.... .S2 ~ -';; e.c:l
Q)....codQ)Q.tlIl
.c:l ~ 00 c: - ....
- -'C 0 ~ ",.c
.. '0 '':: 5 ~
~ (.).~ e.2.z; Q,
",..:c8..i~~
.... 0 ::I 0 U'a =
e . c. .. c :3 0
.... ~.... = 0 8 ''::
-0<00 8~
~:l~'~]oE
8.<ti::l:;...ur.2
~Q)...tlIl=.2=
o~~~8B;::,
II
(/)
;:::J
I-
<:
t;;
~
;:::J
:i
o
...J
...J
o
l.I.
.....
'C
o
'C
~
II ~
~f-<
...(/)
U~
<: Q/;:::J
~
::E~
_et:
z
o
1=
~
;:
U
(/)
~
Q
~
U
~
a
et:
~
r
II ~
o
lJ
II S
c
.u
...
",<2
.~ ~
:.=~
,-.., ...
I- u
et: '"
o ~
~ 0
~=""
;:::J al e
(/) Ii.a
;::;~::a
::... R
_ u ~
-<:.5 II)
.....
1
o
u
..c::
u
-
'"
~
~
o~
V'>
..r .....
~-
~]
8 ~
ri
~
~
.5
.....
t::
8-
E:
~
--
00
C
~
8
~
t"-
V'>
V'>
('oj
~
(/)
I
et:
=
~
eE"O
Q,) Q,) ~
Ie> c
~ 0 0
r..?O-2.-
"0 -
e [;i .~ ... -<: Q)
e ~.w c.S ~ ~ .::
~E~g ",>11)",
~~5>-<:~ "O~..ee
C ~u"OU "'(/)] . Ci =
o ~ 00 -<: Ci ~;:::J ~ .... .s
C .5 ..c:: .... ~ "0 ..... = \0 &::
0': '" OOCl)C [;i e?.o- =
".; ~ fS e.S.9 ~ = (3 =
~ ~ ~~i~<~ 8;iQ
... II) go 0 ... ~ 0 1) ~ 0
8 ... .- r,s - > > - ::s 0 0 V'>
u.a~1I) ~ ~CI""",""('oj
Cl)~-; ~~ ~'::~ 5 8:8~
C C .- ~ II) 6 t:: 00 '" V'> t:-
'0 4i.9 ... (/) '0 0 al e ~ ~ II)
~E ~~"O'::: 8 fr"O g "':::
o~et:o[;i~-<:oE..2]]
"0
S [;i
-sse,,;
.~.~ ~]
......- ~-
.~ 'E ..c:: II)
~ 8 - 3
-<:u.8(/)
(/)
Qigd.. -<: ~ ;:::J
E :.=.9 ~ U 8 .....
::co::3~::! Cc cQ) -g
&:: &:: _ c'" 0 ~ .- ~ c
'" C'l C'l - 0 ~ u -g...J '2
g _ C'l 1) == ~ ~ = >" t::
e ~ ~ u .= .- CI 0 0 -<: - 2
~ .;..: r:': Q) &:: = II) 'C;; ... ~ :; ~
_ ...... v, ;::I _ II) 'f) ~ 0.. > '" =
>U;:::JI1..~:S"O > g.~~;::I
...
<2
~
o
ca ~
en ',=
'00 .!
II) '"
-'co
-;;~.-:...
]"S~
-=0.0
._ :.a ::c
~ ~ '"
~ ~ e
._ C II)
u 8.. as
e '" >
~::d .
5-00
. .~ Q)
II) '-"
cc 8 .!a
~ ! ~
... '" 8.
8 .;;; e
U gj 0..
"0 "0 .5
,-.., [;i ; .c
~"'~=
VJ .:: .:= ~ r.i;
o ].-;:: l: II)
~II)U;::l~
~ "0 oS U .-~
011);::111)
'-":C 0lJ ;
~~3~8
-~ .;:::.....
~.- e - U
-<:lflo-S:'=
"0 8 J:: ~ 8.
[;i B 5 .~.c
~ ......= ~.&J
C'l ~ .c;;..= e
;;g'~g]
(/)"'Ou......
'"
~:E
... -
oo=-g
. =.9 U
.- - = d
"',!"O 0
&.~ e ';;
8' ~.5 ~
('oj
C
II) .9
~ >--E~
:~ ~.... ..r e
Q)~~N2
"0 ~ .!l! ~ ~
_ ~ 1: .00 ~
61;;E~r.I)
~ 8 8.06
II)
.~ -S ~
() Q,) :.:: ~ ~ Q,) r-...
._..c:: . ~,! ..c:: l.l
:0':: O!l 'Q).9 .5 - '"
;::Io~;>~~=;.a
~ e :3 .E Ci ~ -tl .~ E
:.:::-;::~o .....~o=
"'o~t1.l~e "Oec..
Uu >-lI)o.,;u
11). c: \.0' 8..c: ~:.::: 0
..c: "'.5: S '" ~ ;j.J:> U
- .2 - II) Cl) .0 = II)
:; ."';:: "c C e s c....c::
'" u E c...- 0 '" II) -
-€ts<2e:SJ::"O-S'O
~'C = c.. ~ r/J - ...
> ~._ .!; 4) ~.9 tIJ
00 e B ~ e-'-2 "0 e' 8
...... (dO=- Q,)
'" 0 ~.o"" 0..= 1I)..c::
t::-II).5 II)O<C;;-
.P ts 8 '" t:- -S ~ i:i' Ci
c;::<:al"OII)...'-" ....
II) 'O~~0-d~Q)
~~ ;; ~ .....~o:o
8. !5 9 ec.. ... al ~ .'" ~
Po ~ Q1 ~ .~ = c c..
o et: E 8 8 0.. 8'0 8
/' "'~/'
.~
~
;.a
-
'(3
C
g
U
...
8.
Q)
~
.~
.....
.C
o
'C
~
..... ~
- ,Q
~5,Q I
-.- ~ 0
o ........;J __
"'-~ .~ Q,l ~
.s-~....c
.- ~ Q) '~I
5 Q) g ....;;;
~ .-::: '"'" 0 Q,)
""" '" c......"O
"""
r<ll
"0
; al
0-
~.E
UU
::> .5
t:: '"
8.6-
c..e
= '"
(/) U
. ~
= Q)
.9 C
- ...
~ 0
u g
Q.) .=
.-;:: ~
(/)-
II> ~
5.:3
e 5
~~.
~s
U... .~
;:::Jo>
.
....
-g<2B
.= 00 Q)
.::.5 3
-..c::'"
II> Q) Q)
~e-s
<<= 55 e
e' e
('ojQ).....
_E<t
~ ...:E
~ <2 .'"
....."'Cl)
.j:; 8.5 <Ii
.8 [;i -S .2
~ -tl g'5
e~
..9-
_c...
=~c..
~~~
= '"
u ~ ~ .
-tl 8.~ e
cao~<2
~ a.8.~
('oj
c:
o '"
"'-
"0 ~
c: 8.
8.0
o a.
C'l
..s
B
~
.5
.....
t::
8-
o
... -
c..c
"0 ~
[;i E
~ ~
- >
~ ~
...-;
~ g
0-
".; e;
gtE
= Q)
~j
"
II
tI)
:J
~
f-;
tI)
p..
:J
:i
o
:j
o
~
;...
'C
o
'C
p..
.,)
II ; f-;
.tI)
)~
<(~
p..'J
:::E.~
- .~
z
o
i=:
p..
;;:
u
tI)
~
Cl
i:
u
J.,Ll
a
~
p..
~
,
3
II @
110
i:1 ~
"; Q)..2:
.~ s. ~ ~
is. rs ~._-5
'" ~ ~ ~'';;;: 'i '=1
-g ~ .. .- ~ > ..s
ill /Xl ~ "0 = 0.-
= tI) ;j ;'~ 5. ~
.~ "0 e 0/) ~ rt ~
.s ; "0 .5 ~ ~ !;;
.~ ~ '3 :g l:: ~ ~
~ ~ 0 .- =' ~ .... >..
_/Xl~..c'1''''o_
0/) tI) ,-., ~ rh -fl 5 5
'c= .. ~'';;;: ~:E..::;: '"
'" tI)._ =' ~ III ~
.~ ~o!.'i;> g',::;:
5 '5 &: ~ ~ ~] ~
:::E..c:8-(.) Q.'::: ,",u
'"
=
o
.-=: -; ''[
.~.9~
5 ;...... 5
5 '';;;: ::; 5 s
.-= ..! .- ~ 1;;
5'~ 8. ;... ~
..,. 0/) '" ~ r::
~ ~ ~ 1::._
N
'"
. '"
;"'''0
.. r::
3.2
o '"'
U II)
II) ;...
O/)al
;1 ~
'"' 5
o II)
g~
~~
..c ~
o '"
; :~
-g (.)
If:''
II) 5
~ 8
8.~
8'.13
i:1
II)
_8,-.,
e E:o
~ ~ ==
iU 0 0
loo~
"0 r::
eo I ~ = .~ ...;
r:: '" .= 0 r:: II)
'Uj ; t:l ~ .- ~
~ ""c 0 ,-., -g '"
~ e tl 5.~ II) ~
..c: (.) ~ S tI) Q.'c
:g ~ ~ UO 2.~ ~
=' . is. p..=..c:
~s-g<LiOi:6o
"0 ill 11)'. r::
Gi' ; rs .=~ $ ~ 6
tl)ou N""'al
o V'l .- tI) _ 'u
~ ...c: 0 '-" ~ .-
p..- II) r::~"O
o ~ > (.) 0 '"' ='
"-' "'0 O.S -= r..S .....
~2"'" .s~E
V'l ~ ",].~ 0 ~
r- r:: iU._ 0/) - iU
tl)iU~.:!~";jtl)
lH
.1 ~Il ~ .~
:::E ~ So i
l<
5
'"
~
;;j
'"
--
_ (.)
al '5
.= 0 ~
5 r:: al
.. 0 Q.
~ ~.5
0/)
r::
'Uj
'"
o
'"'
(.)
'"'
iU
'E
.B
~
8-
.5
.9
'"
t::
.2
....
j
J]
'" ~ (I)
:~ ~ ~ Q)
/Xl o~ r::
tI) "0'12"
'-",-., ell "0 Ei 18
55:.6:;~~
.- E r:: ..c .... Ej
.. ~ '" 0
.~ 6 ~ e ~ -<(
o 0 ~ 0 r:: .
-5;...088.c
=.&:;'';: t<:'=
~ .- ~ ~.-
,",'i:g:!:l~~
- = (is I .&:; ._
:-:: 00 r.f.) -.n ._ (IS
..c'Uj II) ~ "'[ ~
~ .."0 .
- 00'> CI} .......
~ ~ e [ iU ~.~
/Xl - Q. '-" -5 0/) ell
"""....
.:;; =
=1'1: ~
Juilh
l"!l
r
i.I1
~
...
c
~ .
(
t' ;>
t' ..
~
~
!l
..
~.
~ ~
~B C3:
.::l e u
..
.:!:l ~~i:1~
....e<( 1)3~~
OiUu =--'"
";j" eo~"''"'
(,) r.f.) CI) ._ '':=;;> Q) ~
.- .- "0 ::l al ~
'C -5 r:: as-. N !i .~ co
(.) II ca '"' ~ rs .5
=(.)~"O...,;..r::~
.- 'c - - ';::l e ill 0
'is .~ <( s ~ Q. i ::;
__"OU~l:::E '"
~..tI)'-""SC::lll
~ 5 . ~ 5:.='u -5 5
.B s:l <S s'~ Q).. 8
r.f.)t.f.l<~r.f.)~"'IUU
.~ ~ U p..O ~ -g i ~ ~
.....~-<('-"~==e=
..10:
] ~ '"
~ .... i:1
is.r::5iU~
'" .~ '.::::E 8
-fl~~e-g
~ ~'60 ~ ~
~1Il~.:!=
~
.5
~ ~
f'- (,) ~
. r:: 0
~:: (,)
e ~ '"'
Q.~E
Q. III
<( ~
;;j
iU g
.. ..c: -
u.....c......~
'5 ~.- 0
.~ ~ ~-
Cl (.)..c: e
iU ~.2!l i:1
~.9-:13
Q...O(l)
tI) 0 ,-.,..c:
c c: ........ ......
g,..p.."O
o3~5
o l< ;...
.5 ~.g .B
~ ; ~ ~
:3 ;... (.) '"
tl ..c 'C tl .,;
.5 II p.. 8 i:1
B~~l~
.- tf.I = e
- tf.I r.IJ .....
.- II) = '"' ~
~ ~ 0 () >
~ ~ u.5 ~
0/)
]
~
~
r::
;...
; .,;
'"'-
o al
.. '"
'2 8.
o 0
:::E 5.
~
~
~
-
o
-
../Xl
=<(
.. ;...
;-
- ...
~~
.::l <2
~'-"
.5 .s
i'Uj
~ 5
"0 '"
..... .-
0>
r:: CIS
.::l '3
....c:
=u
g '"
~~~
8. ~ 8
Q.g ~
Jltl)f::.
"
II
1;1)
::>
E-
..(
E-
V)
Q.,
::>
~
o
...J
...J
o
~
.0
'C
.g
...
Q.,
8
1I~t-
..1;1)
..;t1.l
..(:::>
Q.,CI
~lJ.l
_J:lI::
z
o
f:
Q.,
-
a::
U
V)
lJ.l
Cl
t
J,Il
.....
o
a::
Q.,
~
II g
't.l
...
II ~
] ~6
-= ..
Q) "'oQ.
....8. .. c.E '= 'S
5.::-.r;ar
~ .= "'; VJ ....
o ...:! ... 5 ~ 'Ii
-a.;!l & 6 '0' 1(
l<00",Q)",:tS
lJ.l~ Q)"O Q.C::
N
i
::>
-13
e '"
~ll
t: Oll >.
!!l e ~
c Q._
tI)_O
S Q) ]
.;!l ..2 as
:> ~ ....
l:':I'':: "'"
- <<I Q)
~~~
u...."O
Q) -; c::
.; .<<1
6 -
..9~e
1:lIl0ll~
c:: e Oll
~ Q. e
,E.€ e
Q)9EJ!i
:g65~
e ~ j B
Q.,UEl5..
....
=
-~'""'
eE:o
Q) Q) ....
5 ~ 5
ClCl~
.::-
1
Oll 0 ...
.5 c:: ..a
"0"0",
c:: - ='
8.6;.0
~ ~ ~ <U
c:: U ... Oll
8. E-'~ ~
"" 0 ..s ...
Q) 0 '"
... .... ~ Oll
'" Q)'" c::
~ ~ ~.>
E-~oe
'"; .~ = ~
uo.:!=
~
c:: ....
.g S
.... Oll '"
~ .5 'O!Il .
.~ ~ .~ ~ .~
...:!..a1;lQ)E-
UJ =' as
... >. = '1> U
Sg~j~
(<)
Oll
c::
:5
~
E-
o
U
a::
.(
-5
...
..s
Q)
Oll
ell
.~
'"
V'l
~~
~ Oll
~ 5
..c;;;
~ ~
3~
j
'-;~
'C
Q
'C
;
:~
~
c.l
-:t
.
.
.
~
:.
'E 'Ii
= =
~ 13 .E
.... "0 Q.
I:€ ~ ; 0
~ B ~6
""...:!~~
Ci.;!l ~ ~
:>OOQ)",
~~=Q.
N
~
...
o
Q)
S
'" ~
;:::; Q)
~ >.
Q) ='
"Oi
~ 6
13]
~ ~
~ '-9
Q) 'el
St:::
- 0
2 -
.:2 8
:aB
~ .~
~ gj
'S; t
e..s
Q., 0
....i
."::: 6
C;oC::Q.
= =' 0
.;;; 6 '1>
~ ~ ~
::I:UO
.... >.
s-. I..t:=c '= CJ).
..a eo'" '" c:: c:: :-;::
== 1( Cij If'-.~ ~."::: I ~ Oll:g g
o ~ == == 0.:: ~ .::- =,.5 0 5
== .~ .~ g -s ;5 Q) ~ 0 ~ ~ U
.S.d Q) gj (<) ~ g.;!l ==.;!l ...
N=a::.d~'@E~Q)'E!:!:l;::..a
~~ E ..._....:1-.= = "':It:
~Q)Q)OOtl):-;::E-.B~"'8.
'i..(....-=V'lli-~ ==.
.~ 0 ~ e = == ~ e ~ ~.~ ~ e
~t1.l;> 1:lIl~ o~l! .ea::.co.a
~ ..oc::"OOllSOll"'=:>a:l'l!l
'" ...: 0\.;;; cl). .. g Q. ~ ~^ = ~
=gltf)............~ ~O(fj
.d ~ ~ Q) ~ .r;:5 . iE ] 1 ~ =
< Oll 0\ ~ fr 5 ~ 6 e.5 0 ..2
u<- goo g';E 1f'-8.~ d a:l
t1.l 0 >-... g 0 C ~ !5 Q. Q) ~ C
r::!:l t1.l ~ r::!:l... 0 CIl "'.... a:l "0 Q. 0
C
.:2.. Oll
....~ ~ .5
. ;.0'" "0
== Q) 8
i..2~..c::
~ -< - ~ ]._.~ --.
8. 0.::;; C 0
o-t1.l5E5
'- "0 8. 0
o ... '"
.d
OllN
6~
.E ~
il -;;; e
So.E ~ '""'
<=___c::
u~..(~
t1.l 8:;0:;:;
r::!:l = t1.l c
-:t
..dCij
< ~.~
UO=...:!
t1.l... Q) ='
r::!:lr::!:lo.d
Q):di!!U",
.dOE-Q)
.... E = Q) >
o .d.d .::;;
.... -fo Q. -0 .~
t: i .d "0 .":::
8. ~; .5
Q.:I- -
=' "'.=: >. ~
:;;-:;E e
l! = ~ 'u go
"''"3''~'"
o.d.... Q)
!5 U 8.~ .8
OllU~ !:I 0
.5 r::!:l ~ ti .s
]t1.l 8..:! 0
..c:: r::!:l e =' =
. ~ 0
Q)UQ. ~
"0 a:: .
.> E- ~ .... :I
e t1.l o.Ea.;!l
Q., r::!:l N .s.. >
o i6
.s go
g'1>
8 ~
L1: 0
,l
..
II
(/)
:::>
~
~
p.,
:::>
:i
o
...:l
...:l
o
r.
:>-.
'C
o
'1:
p.,
....
II ~
~E-
...(/)
..;1.Ll
<:::>
p.,Q1
~1.Ll
_c(
z
o
1=
p.,
~
u
(/)
J.l.l
o
8
1.Ll
a
c(
p.,
>-
c(
II g
't.)
...
II 25
Q.)
-=
= !t:
'': 5 0
= . ~ '"
Q.) u 0 ~ :;
~~~ gj U
~NU..r:.g
'" N """....,
Q.. ~ .5 ~ ~
~""O~-..=
5 = 8 ~ ~
.~ u r::: ~
.~ .9 ~ '-' '"
~"""oo~'O
~J.l.l'O",=
-(/)5-Cd
~2o~O .
gp.,:::> ~~:E
::t8::tCi5uS
~SOl:
.= =
~ E e'~
~ 8 '" U
.- = Q.) 2
=OU...
=' U c.f! '"
~.'" 0 ~
00:::> .i!J
u '1:) ::t 8
'"
'0
=
.E
o
l::l:l
o
U
o
:::>
::t
....
o
~
='
.S
:>-.
~
:.E
.;<
Q.)
l;::
~
e
U
c
-
c
Q.)
.g E
c Q.. """
0..2:0
c Q.) ...
o > =
_4 Q.) 0
(.l.lO~
.'" l<
<S
~ .g s
~ a1 e
> ... Q.)
.- <( >
00.0 0
E=' .~ 0
c(...:>-.
05.0
p.,...~
p., 00 =
:::> 0 00
~~Ci)
~'c tti
0\ 0 .-::
j:Q-=~
(/) 1il 1:)
Q.)
U :>-.
c;vr;.-:=
Q.)t::..r::l~
Ec.E 5~
Q.."" ..... l<
... 0 Q.) Q.) ,Q.)
BQ:l~~l;::
'2 al I: ~ <
o~.EQ.)O
~ ... e s,c(
N
c
~ c
go~
Q:l go
alQ:l
] al
'0
.:! u
e 's
.E 0
;.:: a
~ ~
'"0.9
.o~
:.:: ec
;.e~
~ ~
l;::..r::l
~ -:
a1 '"
t) ~
.E.!
....
o
.~ e 8 :.....q_
:>-. <<l Q.) 1E
u(.;!t:...o u
5~ss sc.f!
bl) '"'" V1 rJ'J Q,).-
<Q.......r::ls~<:
u E.-:: '" Q.) U
@<E~~;<~
Q.)J.l.l c..~.o Q.)
e j:Q..2 s'r;; 8 ;a
E Q.) Q,) ~ ~ a =
o-=aloQ..~~
U 00 0 ... ... 'r;; .;
'0 = u 0Il.E "';'::
; .;: 's'S '" < ~
~0='''';j...Q.)
-8'c =..s'1:)'~.~
e t:8 5 1E Q.) ~
E-~(.l.luOll..~
-= ~
.~ a1 ] Q.)
~-Q.):; .~
'" '" u . ~ '"
.5 -la t'.!!l B c..
"E Q.) E .!S .! <:
o ~ E ~ .~ U
0...0....0Il1.Ll
UE-Uo~j:Q
N
....
0080 '3
= c '" =
1E l! &'S Q.) Q.)
'" c:: c E ~
t;; Q.) g: ... = Q.) 8
_ '0 .;: Q.) 2 e c::
<<l - ~ "" ,- E '"
~glf:S~o=
..::l~Q.)j:QJ.l.lU<:
Q.) ~
1,.11
0" Q.)
U u
'0 B
la .~
'"
-<
Q.)
""
<<l
~.
ell
'e
~
"';j.
U
'" ~
..r:
.~
:is
S'
'"
J.l.l'
.~
~ ~
ll.. ._
....>
o '"
Q.)-
u ='
t.=.c
....u
10.;
.-
-
'1:)
c.f!
]
...
c::
Q.)
8-
'0
1;
.~
;a
"';;j .
.- OIl
~.5
~8
:a=
u _
... '"
'" g
~-
.5
5 ~ ~
.= 0\ U ~
'!-s"';;j8
'" 0 =.- a
'60'" 0 ~:l
Q.)- ?t u-_",
- = ..... ~ 'En
~~1~~
E-e=].E
N
S<]Q.)
~ ... u
. ~ B
~ 8..~
;; B ~.s gj
~.
~
] -B~
ta e
o .~ ~
_~el3
0"'0.0
"'~"'E
C ~ "'.-
0_ 5 e
U e.- Q.)
1i! Q.).;!i '0
(5 ~ > -> <I'i
-r.22Q.)
r..... Q.. Q.. .E
~ 0 ~ '0 ._
~6~;]
U'- =' Q.)
~ u'~ ~
5 '1: .5.- Q.)
:>-. 0 . - =
;; -5 U C .9
u~<eu
..r: ~ ~ ~ 2
a~~.5~
Q.)Q..QEu
~ g. :U.- ..
E-(/)c(e.E
'3
c
Q.) =
E 0
= .-
o ...
.:: ~
> "0
- ...
J.l.lll..
[(S ""'I
..r: .-
gju]cgc
..r::l:a CdQ.)O
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
"'....c]-z
,,, Q.)... '"
......"" g
'0 8 'j_ 8. - ~
c ..... .... c... 0 ....
CdC~O"'S
..r:Q.)-c4::'"
.~ ~ '8 ~.!a ~ ~
r._ .15'0"'=
....::: c...1:\
o ~ B Q.) Cd 0 ..
",> ...~
~eel_.!~....:;
Q.) '0 :-' .. ~'C
"'4)~..r:_-o
........r::l ::> u eel -.
Q.)u~:a~8~
.c:~..r::l~-O'"
t--t:......'-"':-=.....=
:>-.
':: ..c::: ......
c :>-. '" '2
~ .0 ii: .,
=....... ~
u~o .!..;
",=, .gj!OIlC
.- ~ c.. = c Q.)
~ 00 0 ~ .~ ]
~.5 !1) ""0 =:::
c(ll-=;c.E~
.".
I
lrl
.
.- :!' "
~~ .
:> ~ ~
~ . ,.l .' ~
Q ~ ~ (
,.l ... ~
~ f' ..: ~
; ~
( ... ;.; ti
~
"
~
~
.,l.o
:-
,
(
;..
l. .
ci (
~
:-.
l.o
:-
,.:
II
{/)
::J
~
f-
{/)
p..
~
~
:J
o
l1..
:>.
'C
o
'C
p..
II ~
~f-
~ {/)
u~
<:~
p..CY
;::g~
-~
z
o
1=
p..
;:
u
{/)
l.1l
Cl
5
Ul
a
~
p..
><
~
II g
~
....
II C5
CIl
c
:.c
(,)
1;j
~
] .~
----
.gs~
s ~.-
'" ~
... -
o c
_ 0 c
.- .... t::
S '> ..E
;::g ~ e
t<'l
...
..E
'"
~ ~
e ~
'S .;
g'-o
.......
c 0
.g 8
~a
.... c
.~ ~ en
.S ~
'3 8 ;
~ 00 a
c ; -e
o c :l
.:: 0 c
>',= .-
c (,) '"
Q) 2 .~
''S ...,.-
c:: "'-
;is]
'3
c
e s
c.- .........
0-"'0
.:: ~ ~
I > - c
ceo
.. l.1l p.. ~
"'0
; .g
s ~
'i ~
3~
CIl-
~eoo
0\ ~ ...
t<'l - ~
0\.91Xl
1Xl......
<: e ~
CIl '" Cl
.S ~ ~
~ 8. ~
'" 0 Cll
~ a;::g
..;
B
'2
o
;::g
t<'l
,
0\
t<'l
0\
IXl
<:
~
-
iE
"'0
.3
-
'"
~
o
(,)
":c
c 0
~ ',:
c '"
8~
6 ~
=-
.5 "3
. s 1;j
;::g]
6 e
o ...... '"
.::: 0 "'0
.5 1i ~ 0 a
~:.c; ~ ~
~ ::. .. ::l
... ~"'o 2l 0
.-..~cc..c:: .
; f-.- '" <1ls <1l S
- ~ 0 - Ill..c::....
o cl'.-....
"3 p.. a e ,- ~ ~
~p..{/)-it)l<1l
o.~o.~...~~
~'-"6-c!:l.~
..c:: .:!.l ~ i=:'.9 ~ {/)
~}5 ~ ~ ~ ~ .5
is ~ "3 ~c.s ~.;
:::.E~ ~..c::~
=....,;> t:....as
....
o
:>.
:':: "'0 ~
u; .:::
..so E
.... CIl =
~.~ _ III
~ 0 e rJJ
e: ; <1l e
~{/)] ~
r-
-:,9
~-
i=:' ~ ~
~ ~ (,)
c e S
o ......_
~ ~:;
{/)-~
"'0
='0
o..c::
.;: ~
.. e g..c::
O",..c::-
= _ __ c::
g ~ 8 ~
(,)~~--
.-..
...
<1l
>
.; 1-1
~ .g
'"
; ~
..c::"'o
:: a
<1l
..c::-
_ c
~e
a ~
.- .... VJ
Q.~c
e OIl Q)
U '" E
0< ~ ~
U III .::
.... ill ::l
..( i=:' g'
... ~...
.g c:: S
~ ~'i
~ e .s
_ 0 (,)
u..:: e
c::
J
III ti
> '"
'" e
..c:: OIl
'" e
e !:l.
~ = ~
'" <1l 0
e ~'B
00 ... '"
c:: 0 .
.B?]
<1l "3 OJ)
E g.5
'" "2 ..c::
o l:: ~
~ - '"
f- .5 ~
..;
B
'2
o
:E
N
"3
>lrl
.- 0\
~ I
~-.:t
...0\
~~
.><
0l1..
r- C
~.-
...
c.E ~
OIl <1l
C . C
:.ot)"O
c:: <: ;
..2 c:: _
00 0 (,)
; 'B -0(
c2:>'
.9"iil ~
- c:-
.~ 8]
~-g~
::l ell .
'" '" 00 E
~.~ ; e
'5 c: ~ OJ)
= <1l (,) 0
'.g CI) .~ ~
o t:' <1l :>.
(,) e {/) OJ)
t:: ~ i=:'..9
8.;i e]
5'~~ ~
{/)_....:I_
i=:'
e
~
;i
~
-
:3 ~
00 ~ 's
C <1l ....
~~ ~
(;i8 =
~~ ~
i:l = <Ii .-..
._ 0 = l.1l
~"'O{/)
"'0 - .;: 0
'i~ ~p..
1Xl...... p..
'-" '" c:: 0
f'l"'\ >-.._ ---
-.:to;::<1lop..
:::~oICp..
c .- - f-
lXl::lilXl....:l
-O((,)>{/){/)
~~
p..'i
c. '=
~~
{f)-'&
..c:: ...
.B ~
"'..c::
~ "0
N
e . ..;
cOJ)OJ):>'
op.. >--
-';:!:l.<:S
'" c:q.... .-
~l:..c::"-
..::l 8. ~ 6:':::
__",<1lp..;::g
.g;.e~"'!
s..."'{/)-
{/)f-p..,-,,~
~ :>. ";j '"
.::: = .-
o>~c~
.- e ~ .s .....
up.....o~e
c ......p..
's .,.; ~ . OJ)
.S ~ .;; ~ ~
e ~ .~ q- ~
,trJQ):;;<<i8
lrltSQSa~a
~.sc..lrlE~
~ ~ e N ~ ....
CJ)OO-{/)~
(,) () ~ V') ....
'" 00 N '"
;'s-Cf.)""'Q)
... =='00
f- ~ ~ 0 ~ .-
-..c...",{/)~
U'" "'..c:: .... ...... .g
Q) (,) '" 0 s
'~:.c~c'"
ooo~o.o""
'" - e .;: 0
O",CIl~"'_
~ 5.5 ti ~ ~
=a 'a -g ~ .~ '8'
f- 0..2:'="'O!:l.
'"
~
o
~
.~
~
:>.
]
.5
0.
:l
~
~
.B
B
:>..
-IC
J;l0\
.- 0\
....:1-
.. ~
]<:B
~o.s
~ -<.~ Q,) ~
l1.. = ~:E c
... 0 -.;; e
..g ~ tS '" 00
cos8.~
o .;: 5 .. e
;::g ~ (,) e '"
t<'l
IC
"3
<1l :E
(,) 0 51
.a_ .... .... e
_....",o<1l
o.(,)_~~
e <: '" "'.-
8 ~] 11l ~
.- OIl l::
.5 ~].5
>>:0 -::: ~
;; .!! B 's ~ [
~o~eoo
~..s~8c;;;
=.- Q) C <1l >.
",~..celle\ll
.~ '" "iil..g ~ ~
() C Q) ... Q) >
c: e:t ..... Q,) -- f""l
<1l 'C ~..g 1i :a
~~ ~e "'00
'i~.scBa
] Q) <1l.9 ~..Iot:
~..s~:;~l
~~ e 0.8.@-8
-0( ~ 0. e .;;
0'
II
f/l
~
E-<
f/l
~
o
~
....:i
....:i
o
~
>.
'1:
o
'C
~
o
II ~ E-<
.f/l
...).~
<0
~O
;:;B1.Ll
-~
z
o
E=
~
~
U
f/l
I.Ll
o
e
I.Ll
a
~
~
>-
~
II g
'J
110
.9
.~ lrl
_cuO\
." U ~
~;O\
eIlClO\
~u::
~'O,2
.e....: ~
..... 10...-
eIlCU"Q)
ClClell
.<:> 0.. 11
= = ~
'8cu~
]1]
>. ~
- Cl cu
~.- g
-u86.
..c .! 'is
U~eIl
c;j Q. "0
:> '" =
;> cu ~
CU
ar;~:=s
0\ 0 ~ rJ:J
~~~ >,
O\O\~~
0\0\0"0
.-4 ~ ~ .;
s~:o go
~~~=
Cl
';
c
.~
'"
Cl
.:2
C
<U
>
~
=
'"
]
<ued
Q)
<U =
o.~
~>
'" e
>. -
U Cl
5 ~
~e
e
0..
o
'Q)
~
~
~
CU
'""' Ii
~ .- '"
o ~,5
f/l .-
z-g~
O..E>
~..ce
f/l ell 0..
-=0..
\0 0 ."
lrl ... 0
O\.;;~
lX1 I ."
< ~ ~
.'" l;:; ~
>. ~ ell
5 "0 .5 ...:
..c .- "0 ~
g~9"O
o 6.~.E
-
- ."
." - .
""il .9 8
cu ~ ...
-8. ... =
--; ~
o~ <U"~ CIJ
f ... "'" Cl
~ ~ ].~]
1.Ll",..e
~
1
('.l
!:::
~
o
.5~
I]]
. ... Cl
cu cu
..c_
o 8.
I
if>
ell
Cl
iJ:.a
]
ell
Cl
'0
ell
t <5
...
<U
i
u
e
2
."
Z
.9
'"
en .~
~ '<:> '"
o ... C
= 0 !!2
<""'c
---~~
E-< .""" <u
~Oell
o a.5
P.. ..... tIJ
rJ., 0 5
~ :s....c
- cC
lrl 9 .-
-.....t:
~~~
C'l<::::
<f/l~
--.,: - '-
.9
'2
o
~
('.l
c;=
ClOell
o ..s ,5
.~.~ ~
.... 00 t)
'0 E ...
5:C ~
._ 0 _
- ... 'C
so..O
:.=..c::..c::
'u ~ -= .
~ 0 ." ~
I ~ ~ :-E
-= _ = U
Q) = "'0 ...
e5a-s
cu ';;0 - ;!l
: e'i t::
!.9]:a
""" '" ell 0
..c ~.5 a
~ .;:: eo 'i
e.E!=1i
Cl ~ ~ l;::
ell
Cl
'~
c;::
ell
Cl
:E
U
c;j
~
....: ~d
.9
'2
o
;:;B
~
CU
U
~~
[.~ ~
o _ t:
... 'a <u
0.. E cu
$ 8...s
~;l ~
I;::-~
..... '.'C
S'Q)-
'" e 0
.~ ~ i
8. 8..,g
::;- e ,~
_ 0 u '"
I ~ ... ~
... 'f ~ ~
.g5e~
~Cl.9
o ~.8 !ii
0.5 0.. ~
f~'O~
<u
.~
'0
~
~
.~
Ii ell
d Cl
~ .-
cu -ti .
~tu.!a
e ~::3
'i~t:
g _ 0
-<~
.9 .<
>'0
~ .1: E-<
.- 0
-~ 'C ";j
~'';::
". 5
,2..-
.5.3 8.
c:l
'i ~
] ~
i(E i
"3 c:l ca -=
~ ~ .;:: "0
... e 5 5
oo..-e
~ e 8. =
~
I
Cl
.9 ~ 0
'""' ~ c:l
< ... ...
Cl~1
t,."o
_ cu ...
U <u 0
<..c~
- 0 '"
5 - ~
e~o..
~ 5 .~
~ ~ ~
~ ell;; .
.;; :~ ~ e
at:>,~
~~'3e
cu 'i Cl 0..
..c {/:l = 'ii
- = 0 c:l
"O~&lo
5 ~ :.a :~
e..s2 ... "0
<'i,2~
Cl
.:2
~
~
~
E-<
(J
..
~
'"
m
~
o
!
M
-
-
~
<(.
r-
~
II
1 Civic Center Drive
San Marcos, CA 92069-2949
ATTACHMENT #4
Telephone
(619) 744-1050
ill ffirnffiOW~ ~l
OCT 18~ ~l
L-J\
,
C011NCIl Of liCE S i
(hULA VlST;. CA
provement Act of 199311 was
extended an existing half cent
d city and county public safety
osecutions, and corrections.
172 was legislated so that the
8 cities shared the remaining 5
majority of Prop 172 funds,
llocated back to the cities, while
Sheriff, District Attorney, and
t contract with the County for
than decreased.
counties, rather than increased
lution passed by the San Marcos
e staff report that accompanied
e allocation formula by passing
~
JI
O~tober 16, 1995
Shirley Horton
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Shirley:
Prop 172, entitled "The Local Public Safety Protection and 1m
approved by the voters on November 2, 1993. The proposition
sales tax that was due to expire on December 31, 1993 to help fun
functions, such as fire protection, law enforcement, criminal pr
II
In San Diego County, l1e allocation formula to distribute Prop
County retained 95 per cent of the funds generated, while the 1
per cent. However, in FY 94/95 the cities generated the vast
$93,371,845 of a total $97,836,700. Yet only $5,824,126 was a
the remainder was retained by the County to subsidize the
Probation Department budgets. Ironically, for those cities tha
Sheriff Department service, our contract costs increased, rather
In reality, Prop 172 is a General Fund windfall for California
funding for public safety at the city level. I have enclosed a reso
City Council opposing Prop 172's inequitable distribution and th
it. We respectfully request that you join our drive to change th
a similar resolution.
Sincerely,
F .R. "Corky" S
Mayor
FHS:kst
Attachments: Resolution 95-4591
Council Staff Report
lL
/1 /,
,-' -.
RESOLUTION NO. 95-4591
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF SAN
MARCOS SUPPORTING ACTION TO ADDRESS THE CURRENT
DISTRIBUTION FORMULA FOR PROP. 172 FUNDS WITHIN THE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
WHERfAS. Prop. 172 was approved by the voters on November 2.1993. which amended
the State Constitution and extended an existing 112 cent of the State sales tax that was
scheduled to expire at the end of 1993; and
WHEREAS. the proposition entitled "The Local Public Safety Protection and Improvement
Act of 1993- promised "a dedicated revenue source for public safety purposes" with revenues
to be "distributed to cities and counties for purposes such as police. sheriff's. fire. criminal
prosecution and corrections"; and
WHEREAS. in San Diego County the vast majority of the sales tax is generated within
the 18 cities: and
WHEREAS. in San Diego County, the vast majority of the Prop. 172 funds is staying with
the County of San Diego and being used to supplant County General Fund revenues for Sheriff
Department. District Attorney and Probation Department expenditures; and
NOW. THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED. by the City Council of the City of San Marcos
that they do hereby authorize City staff and the City's two League representatives
(Councilmember Gentry and Alternate Betty Evans) to review and discuss this issue throughout
the County on behalf of the City of San Marcos and the various affected entities to determine
why the current distribution formula exists as it does and to consider a more equitable
distribution of Prop, 172 funds to the vanous affected entities that generate the revenue.
PASSED. APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of San Marcos.
California at their regular meeting held the 22nd day of August. 1995 by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COUNCIlMEMBERS: GENTRY. YOCUM. SMITH
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NONE
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: EVANS. HARRIS
~~Iz.-
F. H. "CORK
ATTEST:
"'/ ,/'
- I
CIft---
I' ,---
__c:Aa__ ....
R
E
f'
u
K
I
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AUGUST 22, 1995
CITY COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER
DISTRIBUTION OF PROP. 172 FUNDS
, THIS ITEM IS ON THE AGENDA AT THE REQUEST OF COUNCILMEMBER GENTRY.
2
3 ON NOVEMBER 2, 1993, CAUFORNIA VOTERS APPROVED PROPOSmON 172,
4 ENTITlED '"THE LOCAL PUBLIC SAFETY PROTECTJON AND IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1993. .
5 THIS MEASURE PROMISED A DEDICATED REVENUE SOURCE FOR PUBUC SAFETY
6 PURPOSES AND EXTENDED AN EXISTING 1/2 CENT OF STATE SALES TAX THAT WAS
7 SCHEDULED TO EXPIRE AT THE E.ND OF 1993, WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE
8 .OISTRIBUTED TO CITlES AND COUNTlES FOR PURPOSES SUCH AS POWCE, SHERIFF'S,
9 FIRE, CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND CORRECTIONS..
10
11 IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY AN ESTIMATED $ 1 15 MILl.ION WIll. BE GENERATED AS A
RESULT OF PROP. 1 72; AT ISSUE IS THE DISTRIBJTION OF THAT $ 115 MIWON.
.. -
'4 OVER 90% OF THE REVENUE GENERATED AS A RESULT OF PROP. 172 IS
1 5 GENERATED WITHIN THE 18 CmES (DUE TO ITS SALES TAX BASEl IN SAN DIEGO
16 COUNTY. IN FY 94/95, SAN DIEGO COUNTY BUDGETED $109 MILLION IN PROPOSITlON
17 '72 REVENUES WHILE THE 18 CITIES RECEIVED, THROUGH THE COUNTY, JUST OVER $6
'8 MILLION. PROP.' 72 REVENUES, ACCOROING TO ST A TlST1CS RECEIVED BY THE CITY,
'9 NOW ACCOUNT FOR 49% OF THE SHERIFF'S BUDGET, 42% OF THE DISTRICT
20 ATTORNEY'S BUDGET AND 14% OF THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT BUDGET. AS A
21 RESULT OF SHIFTJNG OF GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND RECEIPT OF PROP. 172 REVENUE.
22 THE COUNTY GENERAL r:UND SPENDING ON THE SHERIFF, DISTRICT ATTORNEY AND
23 PROBATION DEPARTMENT BUDGETS HAVE DROPPED BY OVER $100 MIWON SINCE THE
24 INCEPTION OF PROPosmON , 72. IT IS VERY APPARENT THAT THE COUNTY OF SAN
,
25 DIEGO NOW HAS THE LUXURY OF USING PROP. 172 FUNDS TO FUND THOSE THREE
26 AREAS, RATHER THAN USING GENERAL FUNDS. .
AGENDA ITEM
# /7
'"
~' ~._';
PAGE 2
PROPOSIT10N 172
AUGUST 22. 1995
1 THE CITY OF SAN MARCOS RECEIVED A WHOPPING $65.~ IN FY 94/95 AS THE
2 RESULT OF PROP. 172; HOWEVF:R, IF YOU CALCULATED THE CITY'S SHARE BASED ON
J TOTAL TAXABLE SALES IN 1993. IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN $2.5 MIWON.
4
5 IN ADCITlON, AN EVEN GREATER CONCERN IS BEING EXPRESSED BY THE SAN
6 DIEGO COUNTY FIRE FlGHTER'S ASSOCIATION. WHICH INDICATES THAT THE COUNTY.
7 WHICH PROVIDES NO FIRE AGHTlNG CAPABILITY (AS IT IS ALL PROVIDc"D BY CITY OR
B SPECIAL DISTRICT FIRE DEPARTMENTS). HAS UTlUZEO NONE OFPROP. 172 FUNOING FOR
9 FIRE PROTECTION. FROM THE FIRE PROTECTION STANDPOINT. THIS WOULD APPEAR TO
10 BE A LACK OF COMPLIANCE. OR AT LEAST A LACK OF EaUITY AS IT RELATES TO THE
" LOCAL PUBLIC SAF: I 'f PROTECTION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1993 WHICH PROMISED · A
12 DEDICATED REVENUE SOURCE FOR PUBUC SAFETY PURPOSES. WITH THE REVENUES TO
, 3 BE .OISTRIBUTED TO CITIES AND COUNTIES FOR PURPOSES SUCH POUCE. SHERIFF'S.
.4. FIRE. CRIMINAL PROSECUTlON AND CORRECTIONS..
16 ATTACHED TO THIS S7AFF REPORT IS VARIOUS INFORMATION THAT CLEARLY
17 SHOWS THAT THIS IS AN ISSUE THAT NEEDS TO BE RAISED, DISCUSSED AND IF FOR NO
1 B OTHER REASON. ADDRESSED BEiWEEN THE CITIES AND THE COUNTY AS A MEANS OF
, 9 ACHIEVING SOME LEVEL OF EQUITY.
20
21 COUNCILMEMBER GENTRY IS ASKING FOR THE COUNCIL'S SUPPORT IN
22 CHALLENGING THE CURRENT DI$TRIBUTlON FORMULA AND WORKING WITH THE OTHER
23 17 CITJES WITHIN SAN DIEGO COUNTY AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (AND VARIOUS
24 OTHER AFFECTED ENTlTIES) TO RAISE THIS AS AN ISSUE AND ACHIEVE SOME LEVE1. OF
25 EaUJTY BASED ON EITHER PER CAPrT A OR SALES TAX GENERA nON.
26
27
AGEND~ ITEM
# /r/
/ ,
... (
PROPO::illlUN 1 / ~
AUGUST 22. 1995
BASED ON A REVIEW OF THE INFORMATlON PROVIDED TO..oATE. STAFF WOULD
CONCUR WITH COUNCILMEMBER GENTRY'S REQUEST AND SUPPORT ADDRESSING THIS
3 ISSUE TO SEE IF A GREATER LEVEL OF EQUITY CAN BE REACHED THROUGH DISCUSSIONS
4 AND NEGOTlA TlONS WITH THE VARIOUS AFFECTED ENTITIES.
5
6 COUNCILMEMBER GENTRY HAS ASKED THAT THIS BE PLACED ON THE SEPTEMBER
7 SAN DIEGO COUNTY DIVISION LEAGUE OF CAUFORNIA CmES MEETING AND HE IS
8 SOLICITING COUNCIL SUPPORT AND DIRECTlON AS IT RELATES TO PURSUING THIS
9 ISSUE.
10
11 STAFF RECOMMENDATlON: ADOPT RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A REVIEW AND
12 DISCUSSION REGARDING DISTRIBUTION OF PROP. '72 FUNDS WITHIN SAN DIEGO
13 COUNTY.
-~
,,.
SUBMITTED BY:
~::::/? '; C~,._)
.. -, - ~- - - -
'. \
R. W. GJ'ITlNGS..: CITY MANAGER
, -
17
18
:9
:0
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
AGENDA ITEM
# /7
,/ ,. ,~"
---'
00., ~ @ ~ H WT~q~:i
, 1 I ,'i.
I ""
. I I,
I NIV - 7 Mi )J
, J~
City of Palm S
ATTACHMENT #5
November 1, 1995
City Council
619-323-8200
FAX: 619-323-7701
TDD: 619-864-9527
TO ALL CALIFORNIA MAYORS
Re: Municipalization of Electrical utility
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
At the just concluded League of California Cities Annual
Conference, a session was held on Sunday, October 22, entitled,
"Electric Industry Re-structuring." Unfortunately, the speakers
largely represented insiders involved with the current deregulation
process before the Public Utilities Commission, and significant
information concerning options for California cities was not
presented. The advice given at this session was, in our opinion,
not correct and, if followed, will adversely affect the interests
of all residential ratepayers in California.
The session was attended by one of our Councilmembers, Jeanne
Reller-Spurgin, and our City Attorney, David J. Aleshire, who,
although not a part of the program, sought to explain that other
approaches exist. Unfortunately, the session was conducted so that
there was no opportunity for this. This letter is being written
because we think it is critical to inform California cities that
options do exist, that they are being pursued by other California
cities, and they offer the potential for rate relief.
Simplified, the advice offered by the panelists (excluding the
TURN representative) was that deregulation is coming and cities
should "sit tight" and see what develops. At the same time,
because of the belief that the Public utilities commission will
allow the investor-owned utilities to recover 100 percent of their
"stranded investment," one panelist, Mr. Jerry Jordan, said that he
did not expect AnY rate relief to residential customers from
deregulation, "in the near term." (In fact, others have said rates
may increase to recover stranded investment.) The lack of
sensitivity to rate relief was demonstrated by the Southern
California Edison ("Edison") representative, Mr. Bob Kendall, who
argued that the average monthly electrical bills of Californians is
the same as the national average. However, since California's
average rate per kilowatt hour is 50 Dercent above the national
averwge, this means Californians are cons...lming 50 percent less
electricity than the national average. If C3lifornians consume 50
Post Office Box 2"7"-13. Palm Springs. California 92263-2743
../
ALL CALIFORNIA MAYORS
November 1, 1995
Page 2
percent less energy, why should they end up paying the same total
bill as the rest of the country? Only Edison would think this
makes sense.
Aren't you suspicious if you are told on the one hand that
deregulation will not lead to residential rate decreases, and on
the other, not to get involved in the process? Thev don't want you
to qet involved. That should tell you all you need to know. Not
getting involved is the formula which will allow the investor-owned
utilities to control the process, making rate reduction a secondary
priority, secondary to their receiving all their costs (and
profits?). This is still a democracy where forums exist for the
expression of the will of the governed. The voice of the governed
has not yet been effectively heard. Not getting involved is a
formula for silencing the governed, the ratepayers, which is
exactlY what the utilities want.
Attached as Exhibit "A" is a League summary entitled,
"Electric Industry Restructuring," which was handed out at the
seminar. This is useful background information. The approaches to
deregulation which have received the most attention are referred to
as Poolco and direct access. Each of these proposals has defects
which have led to an attempted compromise contained in a Memorandum
of Understanding now advocated by Edison. This process was
summarized at the League seminar by the representative of TURN, Mr.
Bob Finkelstein, as follows:
"From the perspective of smaller consumers,
the restructuring discussion represents
significant backsliding, even from a starting
point which did not hold much promise. At its
initiation, restructuring at least held out
the promise of lower prices for all consumers.
The emphasis of the more recent proposals has
shifted toward ensuring full utility recovery
of uneconomic investments, and aChieving lower
rates for industrial and large commercial
customers. Small consumers are only promised
that their rates will not increase from the
already inflated levels. This clearly is not
good enough."
TURN is a consumer organization advocating the interests of
residential ratepayers. TURN advocates an alternative they refer
to as "Community Access." Others have called this approach
"municipal-lite." Palm Springs has probably gone further in this
direction th~n any other city in California (if no~ the nation).
We are not relying on the Public utilities Commission or Edison to
protect our residents. In going down this different path we have
FS2\276\0'4084-009~\2168939. .10/30/95
1" -" ~
ALL CALIFORNIA MAYORS
November 1, 1995
Page 3
learned some startling things. The response we have received from
our effort to exploit the potential for competition reveals great
opportunities for rate relief.
We do not propose to acquire all of Edison's transmission
facilities, which would be required for full municipalization, but
instead we will act as an aggregator for our citizens' power
demand. We would negotiate with power generators to purchase power
and then pay Edison a fee to receive the power over Edison's
transmission facilities. To pursue this approach, we must approach
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) and get what is
known as a "wheeling" order.
Edison claims that we would simply replace their monopoly with
our own and require all ratepayers to buy from us. Not true. We
are proposing to give residents a choice by installing a second
meter and allowing the ratepayers to purchase from Edison or us,
whoever can deliver at the best price.
To raise money for the regulatory process, we initiated a bid
process with potential future energy suppliers. We are selling
them an option to sell us power in the future. We are raising
initially some $150,000 - $200,000 through this process. We have
found there are many potential suppliers who are areatlv interested
in our process. We are now going through a second Request for
Qualifications process, with over 60 entities, to identify our
future major electrical partners.
Other approaches are also developing. Some cities are
negotiating with major commercial users. Consortiums of cities
have been formed, such as Southern California cities Joint Powers
Consortium ("South Bay consortium"). The organization TURN (Toward
utility Rate Normalization, telephone number: (415) 929-8876) has
been formed to lobby for residential rate relief. The effort to
influence the deliberations of the Public utilities commission on
this subject are critical. If the only voice heard is that of the
investor utilities, then the result may be a regulation only
protecting the utility investor, prohibiting the creative solutions
now developing, and leaving the ratepayer, our residents, last in
line.
At another League session, Mr. Donald Maynor spoke concerning
utility franchises and made some recommendations concerning changes
in the law to protect municipalities and their residents. Several
of his recommendations assisting in the deregulation process are
summarized in Attachment "B." We would like to bring them to your
attention.
FS2\276\014084-0093\2168939. .10/30/95
/
ALL CALIFORNIA MAYORS
November 1, 1995
Page 4
We recommend that you do the following:
1. Let the Public utilities commission and your legislators
know that rate relief should be the first priority of
deregulation.
2. Insist that deregulation should not preclude the Palm
Springs approach, community access, or other similar
creative experiments, and there should be sufficient
flexibility to permit these various approaches.
3. Review the Exhibit "B" recommendations with your staff
and pursue them through the League and with your
legislators.
4. Let us know if you would like more information concerning
the Palm Springs approach. We would be happy to assist
others as the further we go the better we can demonstrate
to the Public utilities commission the existence of new
market forces.
On a cautionary note, we know Edison will obtain this letter
and will very likely pursue a disinformation program designed to
reinforce the message they tried to give on October 22 -- do
nothing. Enclosed as Exhibit "C" is a newspaper article
demonstrating the lengths Edison has gone to fight the South Bay
Consortium. Consider the source when you receive Edison's
response.
Once again, we hope you join in our effort to protect the
interests of the residential ratepayer.
Sincerely,
~ll~
Mayor L oyd Mar anov
kI~ ~
{U.AA~ ~
Mayor/Pro Tem hur Lyon
c<:
[SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE]
FS2\276\014084-0093\2168939. .10/30/95
//' /"
/-
ALL CALIFORNIA MAYORS
November 1, 1995
Page 5
jJJJJ.; ~
Councilmember Will Kleindienst
{n~LA:.-- ~jjA,- - d -<0/'>..
unc1lmember Jeanne Reller-~ ur91~
[END OF SIGNATURES]
DJA:el
Enclosures
FS2\276\014084-0093\2168939. .,0/30/95
-, -
,/
" ",,'
ATTACHMENT nAil
......
....-
... II'
1IIIl
........
CafIlbn'IIia C'JOss
\I\Q'Jr ~..
League of California Cities
1400 K STREET · SACRAMENTO. CA 95814 · 191 e) 1558-8200
"Electric Industry
Restructuring: Current
Statu~ and Impacts on
Cities~ SUn. Oct. 22
10: 30 a.m.
ELECTRIC INDUSTRY RES~UCTIJRING
Summary of Key I1sucs ud Loc:al GoverullleDt Impacts
JUDe 1m
BacklZI'ound: In April 1994, the California Public Utilities Commission (PUC) announced that
it intends to "deregulate" Califomia'3 electricity services market. The primary reason for this
proposal is the view that it would significantly reduce the cost of electricity in California. The
PUC proposal stimulated considerable debate, discussion. and alternative proposals. While the
original PUC proposal was to be implemented in January 1995, it bas become clear that before
any final program can be decided upon. a number of major technical and policy issues mUSt be
resolved YJithin the PUC. In addition, the California Legislature bas made it clear that it intends
to participate in any restructuring program ultimately created.
Two Main Models: The two most predominant restructuring proposals are "direct access" and
"pooleo". In direct access, customers would enter into bilnteraJ contracu directly with sellers
(or generators) of electricity. Generators could be a traditional utility or an independent power
producer. The price would be negotiated between the user and generator. The direct access model
would be phased in over time, with large users incorporated into the system and smaller users
later in the system. The pooleo model proposes creation of a pool to which all generators
deliver electricity and from which users purchase eJectricity~ . Electricity prices would be based
upon frequent (hourly) auctions based upon the prices aenerators would bid to sell to the pool
and the demand for electricity by users. All users would pay the same price for buyini electricity
from the pool. The pooleo model envisions the opportunity for direct access between generators
and users, as an option to buyin& and sellini within the pool. The pooleo model would be
applied to all users at the same time. Direct access [s favored by PG&E and was proposed in the
PUC's original Bluebook proposal. pooleo is favored by Southern California Edison and San
Diego Gas and Electric. Recently, the PUC indicated preliminary support for adopting the
pooleo model.
Cost Reduction and Benefits: While moSt involved in the debate qrec: that restrUCturing will
result in reduced electricity co~ some question this assumption. Many question whether the
benefi~ will be equitably shared. or will accrue primarily to large industrial users of electricity.
Because the oriSinal PUC proposal envisioned a phased-in approach to direct access, with larae
users participatini first and residential users last, there is some concern that small users, which
include residential and small ccmnerciaI customers, might DOt benefit to the same extent as larger
users. Many cities are considered small commercial customers.
"", /""
Wheeling: Central to any proposal for restructuring is the recognition of broad based retail
wheeling. It will be necessary for users and sellers to easily send electricity over transmissiOD
and distribution lines from one location to another without the type of constraints that currently
exist (i.e.. utility reJuctance to permit wheeling over their lines). For cities that ienerate
electricity at one location (i.e., methane or cogeneration at the municipal landfill), easier wheeling
is SJ:3 attractive option. While existing barriers to wheelina would be eliminated unde.l
restructuring, some reasonable priee for use of the distribution lines would be levied.
Stranded Investment: A serious issue yet resolved is the problem of "stranded investment". If
the basis for charging fOT electricity service changes. there is concern that previous lona term
capital investments for infrastructure. whether they be nuclear. wind. geothermal or small hydro.
would be "stranded" sod the costS not recovered. Specifically, 50nle express concern that ifretail
electricity prices decline to a more competitive level, then they may not compensate utility and
generation O\\'llers for some of the past their investment costS.
Munic:oal Utilities: It appears that any proposal fllUllly adopted by the PUC will not directly
apply to electricity generated andJor dimibuted by municipal utilities. However, various
Legislative proposals may alter this asswnption. Even if a restructuring program will not directly
impact municipal utilities. it will clearly have indirect impacts. Examples of potential mtmicipal
utility impacts are varied. If a large industrial user is free to contract directly with another
g~ne:ator outside the municipa: utility's jurisdictioo for cheaper power, how will this impact the
mum's rate base and income stream? If businesses outSide the muni's jurisdiction can obtain
che3per electricity, would this serve as an economic c!.is-incentive to locate (or relocate) outSide
the muni's jurisdiction. Some S:lY th.is will serve as a stimulU$ for municipal utilities to lower
rates in order to be competitive ~ith the prices offered by other generators. Others say it will
severely impact the viability of municipal utilities.
Social and Environmental Impacts: In the past, California energy policy has included support of
social programs, such as free energy audits and weatherization services, and support of programs
benefi.::al to the environmer.t. It is unclear at this time how restructuring would impact such
prograrn..s. Some argue that tbe market will decide whether these are programs that should l:-e
supported by society; others argue that such programs provide an imponant "public good" that
should not be: left up to the market alone to determine.
Alternative Ener2V Sources: The impacts of restructuring on alternative energy sources, such as
wind, geothermal, small hydro and biomass varies depending up the resource and how it is
financed. Independent power producers who envisioned and incorporated market changes into
their financial projections (i.e., how to survive after the ten year standard offer/avoided cost
guarantee expires) probably will not be negatively impacted. Some however, such as biomass
producers, have already been impacted as the demand for biomass aenerated electricity by major
utilities declines.
Potential ImDacts on Cities: The impact of restructurina on cities will vary, depending upon the
type of city. For example. restnJctur"iDg has the potential to save cities money. as conswners Df
electricity. Depending upon the size and energy efficiency of city operations, these S8vin~s could
be significant There are other city impacts that must be considered and they depend upon the
...z-
individual city. Cities that currently purchase electricity &om au investor owner utility will be
effected differently from cities that have municipal electric utilities. Large cities will be impacted
differt!':'tly from small cities. Cities that generate electricity tbrou&h cogeneration, small hydro
or met.:;.ane and wish to wheel the power across town to power city hall will be impacted
differently from cities that have no city.owncd alternative energy generation projects. Finally,
it is likely that small, rural cities will be impacted differently than other cities.
The role of the city as a broker, facilitator or aggregator to negotiate electricity on behalf of all
or part of its residents is one that is beini discussed in the restructuring debate. For example,
a city may decide that it can assist small businesses and residential customers by Gegotiating a
better electricity rate, thus extc:Ddine the benefits that would otherwise accrue to larger users to
small users as well. This has economic development potential and would be a new role for cities.
Restructuring will have no impact on the ability of cities to charae and collect franchise fees on
electricity. Previous legislation that dc.tt with unbundling of gas rates addressed electricity as
well. All electricity providers, regardless of whether they are PG&E or Acme Wind Power, will
pay the equivalent of the city's franchise fee. Restructuring should have no impact on the ability
of cities to charge and collect utility user taxes, as long as cities' utility user taX ordinances are
written properly. (The League is working with city attorneys to educate them about this latter
point.) However, if electricity rates decline as a result of restructuring, there may be some
reduction in revenues from franchise fees and utility user taxes, althouih this may be
compensated by a decrease in the city's own electric bill and increased economic activity in the
city due to lower electricity costs.
Status of the Prooosals: Although the PliC had planned to have its program started by JanuaI')'
1995, it is clear that this is not feasible. In March, the PUC issued a statement indicating it
would delay a final proposal. In May, it issued another statement indicating tentative support {or
pooleo model.type program. Such a program would begin by January 1997. In the interim, it is
clear that many of the outstanding issues such as stranded investment and social and
environmental impacts, need to be resolved. At the same timet the Legislature ha.s been a.ctive
in the restructuring arena. with numerous bills introduced. Most are spot bills and few if any ar.:
expected to pass this year.
League Activities: In March 1995, the League Board of Directors adopted a set of initial policy
guidelioc5 on electric utility restructuring. They were adopted After extensive Board discussion
and are based upon recommendations from the Environmental Quality Policy Committee. Those
Guidelines are attached. In addition, the League will continue to monitor the restructuring
process and initiate additional policy review as appropriate. The League will evaluate potential
final support for any formal PUC proposal and/or leaisJation dependini upon how \Veil they
address the criteria in the Guidelines. Finally, the League will provide information, workshops,
and other educational toots to cities to assist them in adapting to the new electricity world that
may result from restruCturing and ensure that small and/or iwal cities are not at an
informationltechnical disadvantas~.
-1...
~mm
" -
"-; / ~
LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES INITIAL POLICY GUIDELINES
ELECTRIC INDUSTRY RESTRUCTURING
Revised April 1995
SmmoTt the Conc~: The League of California Cities SUppolU the CODCept of electric industty
restructuring if it results in lower electricity rates that continue permanently into the future. The
League does DOf support or oppose any specific foen of rcst:ructurini and believes thc program
ultimately implemcnted must satisfactorily address the adopted criteria listed below. ~y DeW
industry structure should be based on a thoro up economic analysis of the full coStS and potential
benefits of the alternatives under consideration.
EQuitable Benefits; ArJy restruCNring proaram should result in all rate payers directly sharing
in the benefits equitably.
Municipal Utilities: Any restructUring program should maintain the concept of mUnicipal utilities.
No restructuring proposal should abridie the wsting AuthOrity of municipal utilities to operate
or abridge the ability of cities to form municipal utilities in the future.
Franchise Authoritv-: Cities shou.ld continue to have the authority to issue franchises and any
program shouJd be -at least revenue neutral relative to revenue currently received from franchises.
Local Control: Under any restnlcturing program, local governments should have the authority
to become an aggregator to negotiate the purchase of electricity with electricity suppliers for their
customers. Tbe decision of whether the individ~ customer within a local lovcmment
jurisdiction should have the option to purchase power directly from an electricity supplier should
be made by the local governing body. consistent with the principle of local control.
Stranded Inve!tments: The problem of stranded investments should be resolved in a way that
keeps investors, ratepayers, a.od aenerators financial whole. ~y policy to deal with stranded
investments for large energy producers (I.e., oucleZlr power) should be applicable to all other
producers (Le., independent power producers).
%eeling: Any proiI'am should facilitate tht! wheeling of electricity between generators and
users.
Alternative ~ources: Consistent with existing Leape policy that supports the development of
alternative energy sources, any restrUcturing proiI'am should ipcorporatc support of altemativc
energy in order to enhance the mix of energy sources available in California, both for
cevironmental and strat~gic encrgy security reasons.
Bio[Q~s: The unique problems of the biomass industry, as they relate to California's solid waste
infrastructure, should be fairly resolved in any deregulations program.
Social and Environmental ImpacTs: Consistent with existing League polity, California shouJd Dot
abandon its eneri)' programs that provide social and enviromnental bencfits.
1Wl:pO&)-
..4...
ATTACHMENT "B"
SUMMARY OF DONALD MAYNOR'S RECOMMENDATIONS
CONCERNING DEREGULATION PROCESS
1. Amend Public Utilities code Section 6264 and revoke authority
for indeterminate or perpetual term franchise (prospective
only -- impairment of contract problem). Legislature should
specifically acknowledge that perpetual term is no longer in
public interest, and establish three? year term for existing
franchises that have perpetual term clauses which have been
invalidated by a court.
2. Judicial invalidation of perpetual term franchise clause as
ant i - competi t i ve and contrary to public policy, stressing
dramatic, unforeseen changes in utility industries.
3. New legislation that allows city to have competitive bid for
gas or electric franchise upon expiration of old franchise.
New law should spell out the formula for compensating old
franchisee for distribution system (e.g., original cost less
depreciation) .
4. New legislation that provides for judicial revie\'7 of CPUC
decisions as a matter of right. Californ;a is only state that
does not; merely allows discretionary California Supreme Court
review, which is seldom granted.
5. New legislation allowing city to aggregate on a community
basis (Community Access) by renting distribution system. This
is critical if regulators require that stranded investment
applies to new municipalizations.
6. New legislation that clearly authorizes cities to provide any
and all competitive utility services to its citizens or to
extraterritorial customers at market rates, not necessarily
cost of service.
IS!I!7h1C114C1K-l1.14H!lhX4,4 aI0l!7/4~
/;
~.
ATTACHMRNT "c"
E ectricit
Da.
VOLUME 5, NUMllBR 80
^ PUBLICATION OF TNIl BLBCTJUCJTY JOURNAL
MON.. OCT. 23. 199'
who agree with us and are opposed
10 a municipal utility there for that rea-
son.-
But two weeks ago. in a different
setting. Edison was taken to task In
an OeL 9 story In the Torrance. Calif.,
Daily Breeze for .playing hardball- of
a differGnt kind. Holding documentary
evidence, the Daily Breeze reported
that an Edison employee was caught
collecting personal and professional
Information on Individuals acUve In
the Southern California crtlea Joint
POWGI'8 Con80ttlum. Edison ac-
knowledged the Incident with a press
statement and an letler of apology
lrom SECCorp Chairman and CEO
John Bryeon to Albert Vera, a city
council mgmber from consortium
member Curver City.
Bryson laid he wal "extremely dis-
turbed" at the employes's acUon and
assured Vara that .U is not a policy,
practice or procedure of SeE 10 com-
pile, collect or keep [personal) Infor-
mallon on anyone. It was an Isolated
act Initiated by an over-eager em-
ployee: Bryson added thai Edison
lookS forward 10 -8 new cooperative
partnership with the consortium: He
concludCld: -I hopo you will accept my
apology 8!1d know that we want to
work Wlttl you as we pr&parv to take
advantage of the emerging competl~
live energy marketp!aco.-
The nine cities In the consortium,
all of which 81e served 81 retail by
Edison and do not operate municipal
utility systems. have been pressing
Edison to cut Its electricity rates to
city reslden's and businesses sharply
and to wheel electricity from lower
cost sources to theIr cltygates. Con.
8'. Uum members, In addition to Cul-
"elr City, are ClIT'8on, Oar-.en., Haw-
lnome, Inglowood, LIIW~dBlo.
Lomite, Redondo Beach and West
Hollywood.
Unaulhorlzed ,.productlon p,ohlbllld by law.
SCE Denies Scaring Off Muni's Suppliers
The city 01 Palm Springe, Calli..
whers Southern California
Edleon serves the city's load of
about 160 MW, says It has a problem
with EdIson. Donald Allen, the city's
outside counsQI on electricity mal-
ters. told Electricity Dsily last Thurs-
day thai the city's Interest in investi-
gating alternative power supply
arrangements has lad It to taKe bids
on supplier options to sell Ihe clly
powar sl some fulure lime. But, Allen
said, .Power suppliers are 80m9~
35 hesitant 10 talk to us because
lJl fear of Edison's retribution. I am
1r9 of at least one instance in
,,, lich Edison tried to chill supplier in-
1erest in the bidding. I am taking
steps to investigate this and to recom-
mend Ihal the city consider approprl~
ate actions. including antitrust litiga-
tion:
Edison vice president for public af-
fairs Bob Foeter was upset and an-
gered by Allen's allegation, 'We just
don't do bU81ness thai way,. he said
In an Interview. .Mr. Allen represents
an opposing party in a contentious is-
sue. If he has evidence of wrongdo-
Ing, he should come forward with It
There's nothing here."
Foster added, -Edison is In favor
of a competlllve market, which we've
demonslrated by our signing on to a
memorandum 01 understanding [on
compeIltion and direct customer ac~
cess]. We're opposed 10 Ihe Palm
Springs initiative because ii1ey simply
want to replace one monopoly with
another in a world thars goIng com-
petitive. We thInk thai competition Is
going to be an advantage to our com-
pany and Its customers. There are
over 1000 people In Palm Springs
Edison Regrets, W/JI Probe Munl Officials' InvBstlgatlon
southern California Edlaon's statement
on the memo prepared by ~a lO'Ner level-
SCE employee that logged per;ol'l8llnlor-
malion abo~ ind'rviduals associ,(ed with .
Southern CaIrfornla Cltin Joint Power.
ConeorUum said that the data was appar-
entry "prepared as background briefing
material. ... Some of the Hormatlon (X)n-
tafned In the documeru regarding lndi-
viduals iI entirely inappropriate, 01 no Inte,..
est 10 Edison, and should rot have been a
part ci any Edison diSCU9Sio... Of docu-
ments. So(jhern Calnomla EdiSlOn deeply
'grets these stalemer1s ard extends _
.III apology 10 the frdMduaJs named.-
T~ information noted corrmonted on
~ individuals' personal chsnscterlstlc:s
300 hon"h. ard on scnooI& attended by
Ulflir children. Ian Q-~, who repor1od
on the e/euthing IncidGnt for the Torranoe,
Ceflf. Dally BrHZfJ, lold Sswlclry DsIIy
ttet the SCE memol1lrxJ~ had noted, for
example, that Hswthorne, Cain., ~yor
LaITy Qufd! had domestic probleml.
-It's 80methlng the KGB would do,-
~uid told the OttRy 8meze. 'When I major
utility cbes this to you, what have they
done In the past to get where they are?"
Gulcl told tt. Dalfy Breeze that he Ms no
domestic problems, Isn' rumil'll for afflce
and Is I OelTlOCl'i!f.
Edison promised thai Its rnansgemenl
wolld CX>nducl a complete review 0' the
Incident and "determine what COUI'ge of
ad ion may be appropriate. Our (palls to
assure that ell employees are once again
made to urderstand the corxluct reql.ired
of the~i and that this aberration of corpo-
rate policy 1$ lMlaooepttAble:
., '1196. The EI.Clrlc:lly Jou,nll. ^" rlgh" ,...rvld.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITElVI TITLE:
Item y
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Resolution I ~ /5 ~ Declaring the Intention of the City to Withdraw
as a member from the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority (JPEBA)
Director of Personnel (I~l
City Managcr~ '1J?Ji!,"
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_No X)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIE\VED BY:
In May 1991, the City entered into an agreement (Resolution 16169) for the joint exercise of powers
with other public agencies to establish, manage, operate and maintain a Medical Premium Retirement
Benefit Plan. This plan provides employees with the opportunity to make unlimited pre-tax salary
contributions to fund health insurance premiums in retirement. City staff is currently evaluating
whether this arrangement is still the best means of providing this benefit. The subject resolution will
allow the City to withdraw at the earliest date if a better alternative is identified.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution declaring the City's intent to withdraw from the
Authority.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
During the 1991 negotiations process, the City agreed to provide a program to the CVEA and IAFF
employee groups to pre-fund post retirement health insurance premiums (subsequent to that time, the
program has been made available to all benefitted employees).
The legal authority to offer such a program is found under Section 457(t) of the Internal Revenue
Code, At the time the City agreed to offer a Medical Premium Retirement Benefit Plan there was
only one known available means for its provision. That means was a joint powers authority known
as the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority (JPEBA), In May of 1991, the City became a
member of JPEBA.
Although JPEBA offers a number of bene fit programs to its members, the City is only participating
in the Medical Premium Retirement Benefit Plan, At the last JPEBA Board meeting (November 6),
a subcommittee of the Board was formed to evaluate the current structure and type of programs
offered through JPEBA. The City's Risk Manager is a member of this committee. Based on their
evaluation, the subcommittee is to make a recommendation as to whether the Authority should
continue to exist in its current form, be restructured to offer only the Medical Retirement Benefit
Plan, or be disbanded entirely. These recommendations are to be presented to the JPEBA Board
after the first of the year.
During this same time period, City staff will be conducting its own evaluation from the City's
perspective. Specifically, we will be evaluating the soundness of the JPEBA organization and the
~'I
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
other plans being offered through them as they relate to the viability of the Medical Premium
Retirement Plan, Staff will also be evaluating alternatives to providing this benefit with an eye
towards more cost effectiveness. Currently there are only six employees participating in the program.
The City pays a flat $600 per year for plan administration fees. With the current participation this
represents a cost of $100 per participant per year. If the Plan had attracted as many participants as
was originally envisioned the administrative cost per employee would be significantly less. In addition
to the cost of the program, staff will be evaluating the impact of withdrawal on the current
participants and their contributions to date.
If during this review period it is determined that membership in JPEBA is no longer beneficial to the
City and its employees the City would not be able to withdraw its membership until July 1, 1997,
unless the subject resolution is adopted, The Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement states that:
"Prior to withdrawal from the agreement, the City must adopt a Resolution of
Intention to Withdraw, This resolution must be sent to the Board no later than the
first (1st) day of January before the close of the fiscal year."
The Agreement further states that "the effective date of a party's withdrawal shall be at the end of the
fiscal year in which it gave the Notice ofIntention to withdraw, but at any time prior to the effective
date the governing body may rescind its Resolution of Intention to withdraw and upon such
rescission, the Resolution ofIntention to withdraw shall be considered null and void."
The proposed resolution provides the City with the greatest amount of flexibility in pursuing the
available options.
A report will be brought forward to the City Council for further direction with respect to
negotiations after the JPEBA Board has taken action on their subcommittee's recommendations and
City staff has evaluated the available options in light of that action. The report will address whether
the City should proceed with or rescind its Notice ofIntention to withdraw from JPEBA.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact associated with the adoption of this resolution
unless it is detennined that the City no longer wishes to be a member of JPEBA. In that instance this
action would save the annual plan administration fees ($600) and any staff time associated with
preparation for and attendance at the JPEBA Board meetings that would have been incurred for the
additional year of membership had the City not submitted its intention to withdraw prior to January
I, These savings could be partially offset by the cost of providing an alternative program.
b:'risk149
p " ,2....
RESOLUTION NO.
11/5,;..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING THE
INTENTION OF THE CITY TO WITHDRAW AS A
MEMBER FROM THE JOINT POWERS
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista, pursuant to Resolution No. 16169 of the City
Council adopted May 21, 1991, entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating
the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority;
WHEREAS, the City has been a member of the Joint Powers Employee Benefit
Authority for at least one full fiscal year:
WHEREAS, the public interest requires and it is to the benefit of the City to
withdraw from the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement and as a member of the Joint
Powers Employee Benefit Authority;
WHEREAS, the Joint Exercise of Powers requires that prior to withdrawal the City
must submit a Resolution declaring the intention of the City to withdraw no later than the
first day of January before the close of the fiscal year.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER as follows:
Section 1.
The above recitals are true and correct.
Section 2. The Council hereby declares its intent to withdraw from the Joint
Exercise of Powers Agreement Creating the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority and
to withdraw as a member of the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority.
Section 3. In accordance with the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement, the City's
withdrawal shall become effective at the end of fiscal year 1995-96 unless the City rescinds
its Resolution of Intention prior to sllch date.
Section 4. The City Manager is authorized and directed to deliver a true copy of
this resolution to the Board of the Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority prior to
January 1, 1996.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Candy Emerson, Director of Personnel
"'7
M:\s harcd\a t1ortlcy\risk.1 ~II
-
8'~3 /'1-1
-"
.
.
2.11 ,I,C.2.c.{6}. Salary reductions will accrue bi-weekly during the plan
year and reimbursements will be made on a schedule to be determined by
the City. Dependent care must qualify under all pertinent IRS regulations.
This is a reimbursement program. Participating employees must submit
documentation of payment and other information illated to dependent care
arrangements to receive reimbursement. Salary reductions not spent by
the end of the plan year, by law, are forfeited to the City.
. l
3. FSA Administration \.
,
The City reserves the right to contract with a Third Party Administrator
(TPA) for administratidn of both FSA's. The City will pay the start-up
costs associated with third party administration. Participating employees
will pay monthly, per employee, or per transaction administration fees, if
, ,
any. '~.
E.
.
Health and Dental Payroll Deductions Treated as Pre-Tax
I
Under Sections 125, 105, and 213 of the Internal Revenue Service Code, the City
treats all payroll deductions for health and dental care on a pre-tax basis, unless
an affected employee requests that such deductions be taxed. If the City does not
meet IRS regulations or if the IRS regulations change for any reason, this benefit
may be discontinued.
F.
Medical Premium Retirement Benefit Plan
The City offers a medical premium retirement benefit plan, under Section 457(0
of the Internal Revenue Service Code, to all represented employees through the
JPEBA, Joint Powers Employee Benefit Authority (or an equivalent plan). This
program provides employees the option of making unlimited pre-tax contributions
from their wages to pre-fund post-retirement health insurance premium costs for
themselves and their depeodents. Since IRS Section 457(f) requires restrictions
on the program that can result in forfeiture of the contributions to the City for
specified reasons, employees are advised to carefully review the information that
will be provided on the program prior to deciding whether or when to participate.
The City will pay the start-up costs associated with third party administration.
Participating employees will pay the participant costs (currently $24 per year).
If the City does not meet IRS regulations or if the IRS regulations change for any
reason, this benefit may be discontinued.
G. Employee Group Term Life Insurance
CVEA MOU FY 1995-98 (Final. June 27. 1995)
Page 19
Y~f
COUNCIL AGENDA ST ATE:MENT
Item Number q
Meeting Date 12-12-95
ITEM TITLE: Resolution It I Sa Approving the Second Amendment to the Existing
Agreement with Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. to authorize an additional
amount not to exceed $69,586.50 in additional consulting services relating to
the preparation of the City of Chula Vista Otay Ranch SPA One Project
Environmental Impact Report and Authorizing the City Manager to Execute
Said Amendment.
SUBMTITED BY: Special Planning Prnjects Manager, Otay Ranch project€>.lprt)
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ ~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes _ NoX)
On January 30, 1995 the City of Chula Vista entered into a three party contract with Cotton/
Beland/Associates, Inc. and The Otay Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership (The
Baldwin Company) to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the City of Chula Vista
Otay Ranch Sectional Planning Area (SPA) One Project. That contract was in compliance
with Section 2.56.220.C of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code. The original contract
was for a not-to-exceed amount of $190,825. The original agreement was amended by the
City Council on June 13, 1995 to authorize an additional expenditure of $24,950 for the
purpose of expanding and completing the transportation analysis as recommended by the Otay
Ranch Transportation Committee.
Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., The Otay Ranch, L.P. and Project Team have agreed that the
second amendment, which shall not exceed the amount of $60,510 with a task oriented
contingency of 15% of said amount or $9,076.50 to the Original Three Party Agreement
contract, is necessary to cover recirculation issues and an expanded scope-of-work that was not
anticipated when the Three Party Agreement was prepared.
The scope of work was expanded to analyze a new land use plan -- Alternative B-2.
Alternative B-2 was proposed by the applicant and included new information not previously
analyzed in the draft EIR as: 1.) an additional vehicular access point from Telegraph Canyon
Road to Village One; 2.) a reduced number of north-bound vehicular access points from East
Palomar Street; 3.) a 2.7 million cubic yard reduction in grading; 4.) an overall increase in
neighborhood park acreage; and 5.) size reduction and relocation of elementary school site in
Village One and size reduction of the elementary school site in Village Five. Based upon the
above modifications, the consultant was required to complete the following tasks: 1.)
preparation of additional technical analyses; 2.) preparation of screencheck response to
comments; 3.) reformatting of the final Traffic Technical Report for the Otay Ranch SPA
CBA-AI13.doc 12/7/95
q -\
Page 2, Item No.
Meeting Date 12-12-95
One Project Plan; and 4.) preparation of additional biological analyses associated with
recirculation of the EIR. Recirculation of the EIR was necessitated by the fact that certain
General Development Plan (GDP) Performance Standards regarding noise, landform and
habitat issues could not be attained. Additionally, extra traffic analyses were required by
BRW, Inc. after an independent check the SANDAG traffic model revealed that the
southbound 1-805 offramp to eastbound East "H" Street turning movement had not been
included. This required BRW to do additional work.
RECOl\fMENDATION: Adopt a resolution amending the Existing Three Party Agreement and
Amendment No. 2 between the City of Chula Vista, Otay Ranch, L.P. and
Cotton/Beland/ Associates, Inc. to authorize an amount not to exceed $69,586.50 in additional
services to prepare the Otay Ranch SPA One Project Environmental Impact Report and authorizing
the City Manager to Execute Said Amendment.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOl\fMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: The City desires to continue to employ the fIrm of Cotton/Beland/Associates,
Inc., an urban and environmental planning consulting fIrm with expertise and experience in
preparing environmental documents for compliance with CEQA. The Amendment contains a not-
to-exceed amount of $69,586.50. All costs continue to be the responsibility of Otay Ranch, L.P.
On May 5, 1994, a revised deposit Agreement was signed by Otay Ranch, L.P. for a payment
schedule. Pursuant to this Agreement, Otay Ranch, L.P. is required to make all payments and all
expenditures are to be current prior to the 25th of the succeeding month. The Agreement stipulates
that late payments accrue interest at the rate of 4.384% per annum to the City. In addition, the
City of Chula Vista has the option to stop processing all Otay Ranch, L.P. discretionary
applications if the deposits are not received prior to the 25th of each month.
At no time during this process have City funds been utilized for the payment of consultants. As
work is completed pursuant to the contract the consultant sends invoices to the Otay Ranch Project
OffIce. Based on the amount of the invoices received, the Baldwin Company is then billed by the
City. The Baldwin Company then deposits the required amount in a City account, and a check is
then forwarded from the City to the consultant for the work performed. At no time has the City
ever exceeded payments beyond City Council's authorization. Pursuant to the three party
agreement, the City is never obligated to pay for consultant work if funds have not been received
by the Baldwin Company. Currently there is a surplus of $40,216 left on the contract amount.
The current Contract with Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., authorized by the City Council on
January 30, 1995, specified a maximum limit of $190,825 to perform the services on the City of
Chula Vista Otay Ranch SPA One Environmental Impact Report The first amendment authorized
an additional $24,950, bringing the total cost to $215,775. The recommended second amendment
requires additional and expanded services for a grand total not-to-exceed fIgure of $69,586.50
without further authorization of Council. Representatives of Otay Ranch, L.P. have agreed with
CBA-A113.DOC 12/7/95
q - d-..
Page 3, Item No.
Meeting Date 12-12-95
this amount, and the Amendment is ready for Council authorization. The current work program
anticipates action by City Council on the Otay Ranch SPA One Project in March of 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Chula Vista. Otay Ranch, L.P.
will be funding the amended scope-of-work ($69,586.50) through their Agreement and monthly
deposit to the Otay Ranch trust account.
Attachments:
Exhibit One:
Exhibit Two:
Amendment NO.2 to the Three Party Agreement
Resolution of Approval
CBA-A113.DOC
1217195
l1-~
RESOLUTION NO. 18"/53
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
EXISTING AGREEMENT WITH COTTON/BELAND/
ASSOCIATES, INC. TO AUTHOR I ZE AN ADDITIONAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $69,586.50 FOR ADDITIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES RELATING TO THE
PREPARATION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OTAY
RANCH SPA ONE PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on January 30, 1995, the city of Chula vista
entered into a three party contract with Cotton/Beland/Associates,
Inc. and The Otay Ranch, L.P., to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the City of Chula vista Otay Ranch Specific Plan
Area One Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $190,825; and
WHEREAS, the original contract was amended by the City
Council on June 13, 1995 to authorize an additional expenditure of
$24,959 for the purpose of expanding and completing the
transportation analysis as recommended by the Otay Ranch
Transportation Committee; and
WHEREAS, a Second Amendment is now necessary to prepare
an additional technical analysis; prepare screencheck response to
comments; reformat the final Traffic Technical Report for the Otay
Ranch SPA One Project Plan and prepare additional biological
analyses associated with the recirculation of the EIR.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Second Amendment to the
Existing Agreement with Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc., in the form
preesnted with such minor modifications as may be required by the
city Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office
of the city Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the
Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager of the City
of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Amendment for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/'
~- -,
::...':';;"~~------
Gerald Jamriska, Special
Planning Projects Manager
Bruce M. BOogaard," City
Attorney
C:lrslcotton.2nd
9-q
EXHIBIT ONE
AMENDMENT NO.2
TO THE THREE PARTY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COTTON/BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND OTAY RANCH, L.P. FOR CONSULTING WORK TO BE
RENDERED WITH REGARD TO THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT,
SPA ONE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
This Agreement made this 12th day of December 1995, between the City of Chula
Vista ("City"), Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. ("Consultant") and the Otay Ranch, L.P.
("Applicant"), is the second amendment to that Agreement dated February 2, 1995, entitled
"Three Party Agreement Between City of Chula Vista, Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc. and the
Otay Ranch, L.P. for Consulting Work to be Rendered with Regard to the Otay Ranch
Project" between the same parties ("Original Agreement"), and was made with reference to
the following facts:
I. RECITALS
1. The parties have entered into the Original Agreement above entitled and dated
for the purpose of having the Consultant prepare an Environmental Impact Report and for
other environmental documents;
2. Whereas, the Original Agreement required the Consultant, through itself or
through a subconsultant, to provide a certain quantum of transportation analysis with regard to
the various transportation systems and intersections on SPA One of the Otay Ranch;
3. Whereas the Original Agreement was amended on June 13, 1995 by the City of
Chula Vista City Council in the amount of $24,950 to allow the Consultant to prepare an
additional traffic analysis of 29 additional intersections within the territory of SPA One of the
Otay Ranch plus other miscellaneous additional transportation analyses; and
4. Whereas the Environmental Impact Report must be recirculated due to required
additional biological and traffic related analyses deemed necessary by staff.
5. The parties desire the consultant to prepare additional transportation analyses
and prepare additional versions of the Traffic Technical Report based on the B-2 Alternative.
q-S
Amendment No, 2
c otton/B eland/ Associates, Inc.
Page 2
II. OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS
Now, therefore, the parties hereto do agree to amend the Original Agreement and
Amendment No.1 as follows:
1. Exhibit D-l entitled "Scope of Services and Schedule, C/B/ A," attached to the
Original Agreement via its reference in Exhibit A, Section V, is hereby amended to
incorporate Tasks 3, 6, 7 and 8 as set forth in the letter of November 28, 1995 from
Cotton/Beland/ Associates, Inc. to Mr. Gerald Jamriska attached to this Amendment No.2 as
Exhibit A. No other terms and conditions of said Exhibit A are incorporated herein by
reference.
2. Exhibit D-2 entitled "Scope of Services and Schedule, BRW" attached to the
Original Agreement via its reference in Exhibit A, Section V, is hereby amended to
incorporate Tasks E-2(a) and E-2(b) as set forth in the letter of November 28, 1995 from
Cotton/Beland/ Associates, Inc. to Mr. Gerald Jamriska attached to this Amendment No.2 as
Exhibit A. No other terms and conditions of said Exhibit A are incorporated herein by
reference.
III. COMPENSATION
Notwithstanding, the compensation set forth on Exhibit C to the Original Agreement,
for the performance of the amendments herein contained to the Original Agreement, Applicant
shall pay a single fixed-fee in the amount of $60,510 when the work product herein required
has been performed, submitted to the City and has been deemed by the City to be satisfactory.
If unforseen additional work is required in order to complete the analysis upon the approval of
the City, Applicant shall pay a not to exceed additional amount of $9,076.50 for such work
which shall be performed on a not to exceed time and materials basis.
IV. All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement, not expressly or indirectly
amended by the terms of this amendment, shall remain in full force and affect and shall
otherwise govern the terms of this Agreement.
(End of Page. Next Page is Signature Page.)
CBAMEND J. DOC
4-~
Amendment No, 2
CottonlBeland/ Associates, Inc,
Page 3
SIGNATURE PAGE
Now, therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting
their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA:
CONSULTANT:
Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
BY:
BY:
John Goss, City Manager
John E. Bridges, Principal
Dated:
Dated:
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
APPLICANT:
The Otay Ranch, L. P.
a California Limited Partnership
By: Baldwin Builders, a
California Corporation,
its general partner.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Dated:
BY:
Kim J. Kilkenny, Vice-President
Dated:
Attachment:
Exhibit A: Letter dated November 28, 1995 from Cotton/Beland/Associates, Inc.
CBAMENDLDOC
q-1
,= B H :' a n [I 1 e 'J 'J
TE_ t-~G. r:,~'~.-':,'='5-'~15JS
r41J' .>.Y:~ IJ:~:':- ~io.,)':'': ::,:~
EXHIBIT ,;
COTTON/BELAND/ASSOCIATES, INC.
UJ\!3^'\,' 1\,'\,'0 EN\'IR(),'\,'i\1ENTI\L PLi\~,'\IINC; C:O,'\.;Sl:L TANTS
rc..00I
November 28, 1995
Mr, Gerald J. Jamriska, AICP
Special Planning Projects Manager
Olay Ranch Project Office
315 Fourth Avenue, Suite A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Subject: Otay Ranch SPA 1 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) - Contract .A.mcndment
Request No, 2
Dear :Mr. lamriska:
Please ae<x:pt this letter as a fonnal request to amend the Olay Ranch SPA One ElR contract
dated January 30,1995 between the City of Chula Vista. the Otay Ranch. L.P., and
Cotton/Belandl Associates (CHA). Our request incorporates additional work to be
accomplished by CBA as SPA One EIR preparer. and our subconsultants BRW, lnc, (BRW),
and Sweetwater Environmental Biologists (SEB). fiRW is responsible for preparing the SPA
One transportation analysis and SEB is responsible for the biological resource analysis.
The level of effort necessary to complete the EIR for the project has increased as a result of
significant modifications to oliginal work tasks identified in the CBA, BRW and SEB contract
scopes of work (Exhibits D- J, D-2 and D-3 of the January 30 contract). The requested
amendment includes a budget augmentation of $60,510 and a contingency for additional
services of $25,000. The budget augmentation of $60,510 includes $23,780 for CBA.
$26,400 for BRW, and $10,330 for SEB. The following information describes the additional
services which require a contract amendment and the associated hourslbudget increase
(original request for CBA Task 3A and BRW Tasks E-2(a) and (b) was submitted on October
23, 1995):
Cotton/BeJand/Associatcs (EIR Prr-paration)
Task JA - EJR Incorporation of Additional Tt'affic Anal)'se.s
. Development and review of two additional technical analyses, two additional meetings
with City staff, and two additional versions of the revised Trame Technical Report in
response to City comments, and incorporation of revised technical analyses in ElR.
Additional Staff Hours Required: 100
Budget Increase: $8,200
~.j7 E,I\~'" GRFFr--.. STRF.FT 5UITF ,1(1(,. PASA0F"JA ('-"IIFORNIA
,11'1:1) 3J4.(l1OL FAX 1811:\) YJ-l.U4'j2
<{-~
q I ,rl1
C S H S .j, n D 1 t- '~JC'
TEL r~ c' . I~, 1 '~4 -.: :.. ': - ':15 J S
No" ::?:.'~15 j4JI"": UoJ"-:': -
Gerald J. Jamriska, Ale?
November 28, 1995
Page Two
Task 3B - Em Incorporation of Additional Technical Assessment (or Network Coding
· Development and review of additional technical assessment (described in BRW Phase
G) to address SANDAG model network coding error affecting southbound to
eastbound movement of traffic at the interchange of East H Street and Interstate 805,
and incorporation of additional technical assessment in ElR.
Additional StatfHours Required: 60
Budget Increase: $4,920
Task 3C - Ern Incorporation of Additional Biological Resource Analyses
· Development and review ofadditionaI biological resource analyses (describeJ in SEll
Task 6 and 7) associated with noise level threshold impacts to coastal California
gnatcatcher, revisions to biological rcsour,,,es technical report, and incorporation into
EIR
Additional Staff Hours Required: 60
Budget Increase: $4.920
Task 3D - Additional Project ManagementfMeetingslHearings
· CBA sta1fattendance at additional project meetingslhearings associated with the new
technical assessment (described in BRW Phase G) and with revised technical report
and noise level threshold for coastal California gnatcatcher (described in SEB Task
6 and 7).
Additional Staff Hours Required: 70
Budget Increase: $5,740
Task 3E - Contingency for Additional Responses to Comments
· The addition of new information described in tlus request will require recirculation of
certain sections of the Draft EJR for SPA One. The public review period remains
open during recirculation and additional comments on the contents of the Draft EIR
may be received. If additional comments are received, responses must be prepared
as pan of the Final ElK We request that a contingency of $25,000 be identified for
this purpose to cover costs that may be incurred by CBA, BRW and SEB. This
contingency could only be used with prior authorization from the City.
BRW (TranspOr1ation Analyses)
Phase E - Preparation of Draft and Final Technical Report
Task E-2(a)
· Two additional technical analyses, two additional meetings with City staff, and two
additional versions of the revised Traffic Technical Report in response to City
screencheck comments.
Additional Staff Hours Required: 120
Budget Increase: $8,400
C\-l1
C B H S enD 1 e 'j 'J
TE~ r~c. .:l~I-.:.~':-I:I::j5
r I o. :':'?,?:: 1 J : .:1 ~ i.lo. '} ':'::- :
(jerald J. Jamriska, AlCP
November 28, 1995
Page Three
Task E-2(b)
· Reformatting of final Traffic Technical Report to ae<:ommodate two additional
technical analyses described in Task E-2(a) to incorporate new text, figures, and
appendices.
Additional Statf Hours Required: 60
Budget Increase: $4,200
l'hase G - Additional Technical Assessment for Network Coding
· Prepare an additional technical assessment to address SANDAG model network
coding error affecting southbound to eastbound movement of traffic at the
interchange of East H Street and Interstate 805.
Additional Staff Hours Required: 120
Budget Increase: $8,400
Phase H - Additional Pl'oject Meetings/Hearings
· BRW staff attendance ilt additional project meetingslhearings associated with the new
technical assessment described in Phase G and recirculation of the Draft ErR.
Additional Statf Hours Required: 60
Budget Increase: $5,400
CBA recommends that BR W be used to prepare the additional work described in this letter.
BR W is currently in the final stages of the traffic analysis for the Otay Ranch SPA One
project. Mr. Dan Marum is serving as Project Manager for BRW and provides a continuous
linkage in this role between the previous Otay Ranch GDP Traffic Analysis and the SPA One
project. Mr. Marum is supported by a strong local staff and the resources of a national firm
specializing in transportation planning and traffic engineering. The combination of Mr.
Marum's extensive local knowledge of key transportation issues and the fiml's proven
commitment to providing professional services to the City of Chula Vista render BR W
uniquely qualified to provide the additional technical services needed for this project.
Sweetwater Environmental Biologists (Biological Resource Analysis)
Task 6 . Noise Level Threshold for Coastal California Gnatcatcher
. Address noise level threshold for impacts to coastal California gnatcatcher with U.S.
Fish & Wildlife Service.
Additional Staff Hours Required: 24
Budget Increase: $2,600
Task 7 .. Revised Biological Technical Report
. Revise biological technical report to reflect changes in Phase II IU.1P and results of
noise level threshold for impacts to California gnatcatcher.
Additional Staff Hours Required: 44
Budget lncrease: $4,380
L{- (D
':BH
'3 ~ n ;) leg ,]
T E :... ~I,:,. ':' 1 '~, - ,< ~ -!) 5 J ~
No'
~ ~:: . (~S 1 J : 0:::: N IJ . J (J:- -
Gerald J. Jamriska, AICP
November 28, 1995
Page Four
Task 8 - Additional Project MeetingslHearings
. SEH staff attendance at additional proj~ct meetingslhearings associated with noise
level threshold impacts for coastal California gnatcatcher and the revised technical
report,
Additional Staff Hours Required: 35
Budget Increase: $3,350
CDA recommends that SEB be used to complete the additional biological resources work,
SEB has completed all biological resource impact analyses to this point. SEB Principal, Mr.
Barry Jones is a recognized expert on the coastal California gnatcatcher. He is supported by
other biologists including Senior Project Manager, Mr. Lany Sward, who have extensive
knowledge of the Otay Ranch environment, its natural resources and ongoing regional habit <it
conservation efforts. Based on earlier work on SPA One and professional qualifications to
complete the additional assignment. SEB is uniquely qualified for this effort.
Please contact me at (619) 625-0056 if you need any additional infomlation regardir.g this
request.
Sinccrely,
~z~
John E. Bridges. AICP
Principal
JEB: csk
8'8.00
q -il
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item Number II)
Meeting Date 12-12-95
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution ) i J ~ ~ Approving the First Amendment to the Existing
Agreement with Wi ldan Associates to authorize $44,528 for additional
consulting services relating to the preparation of the City of Chula Vista
Otay Ranch SPA One Project Public Facilities Financing Plan and
Authorizing the City Manager to Execute Said Amendment
~(W
Special Planning Projects ~ger, Otay Ranch Project> ~ &0
City Manage'\J';( ~ ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolO
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
On February 2, 1995, the City of Chula Vista entered into a three party contract with Willdan
Associates and Otay Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership (Baldwin Company), to
prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for the City of Chula Vista Otay Ranch
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) One Project. That contract was in compliance with Section
2.56.220.C of the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code. The original contract was for a not-
to-exceed amount of $22,500.
Willdan Associates, Otay Ranch, L.P. and the Project Team have agreed that the currently
proposed amendment, in the amount of $38,720 and a task oriented contingency of 15 % of
said amount ($5,808) to the Original Three Party Agreement contract, is necessary to cover an
expanded scope-of-work that was not anticipated when the Three Party Agreement was
prepared.
The scope-of-work was expanded to analyze a new land use plan -- Alternative B-2.
Alternative B-2 was proposed by the applicant and included new information not previously
analyzed in the draft EIR as: 1.) an additional vehicular access point from Telegraph Canyon
Road to Village One; 2.) a reduced number of north-bound vehicular access points from East
Palomar Street; 3.) a 2.7 million cubic yard reduction in grading; 4.) an overall increase in
neighborhood park acreage; and 5.) size reduction and relocation of the elementary school site
in Village One and size reduction of the elementary school site in Village Five. The above
modifications required the applicant to attend additional meetings and to prepare additional
screencheck drafts. Additionally, revisions to the proposed SPA conditions of approval which
impacted the PFFP had to be revised and incorporated into the document.
RECOl\1MENDATION: Adopt a resolution amending the existing Three Party Agreement and
Amendment No.1 between the City of Chula Vista, Otay Ranch, L.P. and Willdan Associates to
wda-113A.doc 12/7/95
\c-\
Page 2, Item No.
Meeting Date 12-12-95
authorize $44,528 in additional services to prepare the Otay Ranch SPA One Project Public
Facilities Financing Plan and authorizing the City Manager to execute said amendment.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: The City desires to continue to employ the firm of Willdan Associates, an
engineering and planning firm with expertise and experience in preparing public facilities fmancing
plans, for compliance with the City Growth Management Program guidelines and procedures. The
Amendment contains a not-to-exceed amount of $44,528. All costs continue to be the
responsibility of Otay Ranch, L. P.
On May 9, 1994, a revised deposit Agreement was signed by Otay Ranch, L.P. for a payment
schedule. Pursuant to this Agreement, Dtay Ranch, L.P. is required to make all payments and all
expenditures current prior to the 25th of the succeeding month. The Agreement stipulates that late
payments accrue interest at the rate of 4.384 percent per annum to the City. In addition, the City
of Chula Vista has the option to stop processing all Otay Ranch, L.P. discretionary applications if
the deposits are not received prior to the 25th of each month.
At no time during this process have City funds been utilized for the payment of consultants. As
work is completed pursuant to the contract the consultant sends invoices to the Otay Ranch Project
Office. Based on the amount of the invoices received, the Baldwin Company is then billed by the
City. The Baldwin Company then deposits the required amount in a City account, and a check is
then forwarded from the City to the consultant for the work performed. At no time has the City
ever exceeded payments beyond City Council's authorization. Pursuant to the three party
agreement, the City is never obligated to pay for consultant work if funds have not been received
by the Baldwin Company. Currently, there is a surplus of $2,250 left in the original account.
The current Contract with Willdan Associates, authorized by the City Manager on February 2,
1995, specified a maximum limit of $22,500 to perform the services on the City of Chula Vista
Otay Ranch SPA One Project Public Facilities Financing Plan. The recommended amendment
authorizes additional and expanded services for a grand total not-to-exceed figure of $61,220
without further authorization of Council. Representatives of Dtay Ranch, L.P. have agreed with
this amount, and the Amendment is ready for Council authorization. The current work program
anticipates action by City Council on the Otay Ranch SPA One Project in March of 1996.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Chula Vista. Otay Ranch, L.P.
will be funding the amended scope-of-work ($44,528) through their Agreement and monthly
deposit to the Otay Ranch trust account.
Attachments:
Exhibit One:
Exhibit Two:
Amendment No. 1 to the Three Party Agreement
Resolution of Approval
wda-113A.doc 12/7/95
\\) - d-
RESOLUTION NO. / Ylfy
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE EXISTING AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
TO AUTHORIZE AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $44,528 FOR ADDITIONAL CONSULTING
SERVICES RELATING TO THE PREPARATION OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA OTAY RANCH SPA ONE PROJECT
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID
AMENDMENT
WHEREAS, on February 2, 1995, the City of Chula Vista
entered into a three party contract with Willdan Associates and
Otay Ranch, L.P., a California limited partnership (Baldwin
Company), to prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for
the City of Chula vista Otay Ranch sectional Planning Area (SPA)
One Project for a not-to-exceed amount of $22,500; and
WHEREAS, a First Amendment is now necessary to cover an
expanded scope-of-work that was not anticipated when the Three
Party Agreement was originally approved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Amendment to the
Existing Agreement with willdan Associates in the form presented
wi th such minor modif ication as may be required by the City
Attorney, a copy of which shall be kept on file in the office of
the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the Clerk
in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager of the city
of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Amendment for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
./'.
--
----~~--' "',
Gerald Jamriska, Special
Planning Projects Manager
, "-
~ruc~~...~:B~o~aa~0)
At.torne-y________ /' ,
h", ~
C:\rs\willdan,lst
1// -.3
THIS PAGE BLANK
Jf) - Y
EXHIBIT ONE
M1ENDMENT NO.1
TO THE THREE PARTY AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
AND OTAY RANCH, L.P. FOR CONSULTING WORK TO BE
RENDERED WITH REGARD TO THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT,
SPA ONE PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
This Agreement made this 12th day of December 1995 between the City of Chula Vista
("City"), Willdan Associates ("Consultant") and Otay Ranch, L.P. ("Applicant") is the first
amendment to that Agreement dated February 2, 1995 entitled, "Three Party Agreement
Between City of Chula Vista, Willdan Associates and the Gtay Ranch, L.P. for Consulting
Work to be Rendered with Regard to Public Facilities Financing Plan for Otay Ranch SPA
One" between the same parties ("Original Agreement") and was made with reference to the
following facts:
I . RECITALS
1. The parties have entered into the Original Agreement above entitled and dated
for the purpose of having Consultant prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan;
2. Whereas, analysis of the additional Alternative B-2 for SPA One of the Otay
Ranch is necessary; and
3. The parties desire the Consultant to analyze Alternative B-2 of SPA One of the
Otay Ranch as set forth in the modifications herein provided.
II. OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS
Now, therefore, the parties hereto do agree to amend the Original Agreement as
follows:
1. Attachment A entitled "Otay Ranch SPA One PFFP Work Program," attached
to the Original Agreement via its reference in Exhibit A, Section V, is hereby
amended to incorporate the additional tasks as set forth in the letter of
November 19, 1995 from Willdan Associates to Mr. Gerald Jamriska, attached
to this Amendment No. 1 as Exhibit A. No other terms and conditions of said
Exhibit A are incorporated herein by reference.
~
)b -~
Amendment No, I
Willdan Associates
Page 2
III. COMPENSATION
Notwithstanding, the compensation set forth in Exhibit "C" to the Original Agreement,
for the performance of the amendments herein contained to the Original Agreement, Applicant
shall pay a single fixed-fee in the amount of $38,720 when the work product herein required
has been performed, submitted to the City and has been deemed by the City to be satisfactory.
If unforseen additional work is required in order to complete the analysis upon the approval of
the City, Applicant shall pay a not to exceed additional amount of $5,808 for such work which
shall be performed on a not to exceed time and materials basis.
IV. OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement, not expressly or indirectly
amended by the terms of this amendment, shall remain in full force and affect and shall
otherwise govern the terms of this Agreement.
(End of Page. Next Page is Signature Page.)
wdamcnd 1 ,doc
;0 -to
Amendment NO.1
WilIdan Associates
Page 3
SIGNATURE PAGE
Now, therefore, the parties hereto, having read and understood the terms and
conditions of this Agreement, do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting
their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA:
CONSULTANT:
Willdan Associates
BY:
BY:
John Goss, City Manager
Dated:
Dated:
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
APPLICANT:
The Otay Ranch, L.P.
a California Limited Partnership
By: Baldwin Builders, a
California Corporation,
its general partner.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Dated:
BY:
Kim J. Kilkenny, Vice-President
Dated:
Attachment:
Exhibit A: Letter dated November 19, 1995 from Willdan Associates to Gerald 1. lamriska
wdamend I. doc
1t>-1
EXHIBIT .~
-'~/
/;\,
~ ~
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES 0 ENGiNE::RS & ~L.r\NNE-<S
Prc.'ess,ono: C onsG:tlng 5erVices Since i 964
November 19, 1995
HOV20mi
- ._~---~
Ger~ld J. Jamrisk~
Speci~1 Planning Projects Man~ger
Ot~y Ranch Project Office
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
315 Fourth Avenue, Suite A
Chul~ Vista. CA 91910
Suhject:
Request for Change Order to PFFP Contract
De~r Mr. Jamrisk~:
This letter represents our form~1 request for ~n incre~se in our lump sum fee for the work
we ~re performing to prepare the Public F~cilities Finance Plan for Otay R~nch SPA One
authorized by the Three Party Agreement dated February 2, 1995 and by City Purchase
Order No. 206754. We withdrew an earlier change order request dated September 18, 1995
when it became apparent that significant new work was going to be required to prepare the
PFFP. We resubmitted a revised letter of request dated November 8, 1995, and this was
subsequently returned when even further changes to the PFFP and the schedule for
adoption were further revised. This letter represents our third attempt to request a change
to our contract and is based on the following changes to our scope of work:
1. On at least five occasions during work on the PFFP, the Otay Ranch SPA One
phasing and units associated with such phasing have been changed. This has
resulted in additional time and effort on our part to review the new phasing and
proceed with changes to the PFFP. We initiated our study based on the SPA
One Plan dated July 1994. We subsequently received a revised SPA Plan dated
April 21, 1995. Finally, we have been asked to prepare the PFFP based on the
"H2" alternative SPA Plan.
2. Revised master plans for public facilities to serve SPA One have had to be
reviewed and language in the PFFP has needed to be revised accordingly to be
consistent with such plans. These plans have needed to be further changed by
the phasing and units associated with 82 alternative.
3. The schedule for preparation of the PFFP has been extended to accommodate
the changes in the SPA One plan and the staff review process. This has created
a situation where changes have been made on a continuous basis which has
resulted in additional time being spent by the consultant.
) t) -~
Mr. Gerald J. Jarnriska
November 19, 1995
Page 2
4. A total of four draft PFFP documents have been prepared for review. The;
include the Screen Check dated October 13. 1995: the Screen Check (Second
Draft) Jated October 31. 1995: a staff review PFFP Jated 010vember 13. 1995:
and a final draft PFFP dated November 20. 1995.
5. Extra meetings. Changes to the SPA One plan and phasing has resulted in
additional meetings, telephone calls anJ correspondence beyond that anticipated
with the original scope of work and fee. AJditional meetings have primarily
involved the City's Policy Committee and the Technical Committee. It is
anticipated at this time that the following general schedule will he followed for
adoption of the PFFP:
. Planning Commission consider EIR EmJ of January [9l)()
. Planning Commission consider SPA PlanjPFFP & Tentative Map Fehruar;.
+City Council consider March
. SPA PlanjPFFP
. Tentative Map
. Amendments
. Prezone/Zone Amendments
Our initial fee proposal submitted by Willdan Associates to prepare the PFFP was
suhsequently reduced to the current fee amount of $22,500 in response to your admonitiofl
that the PFFP would only be an update to the "boiler plate" language already existing
together with the information that existed at that time in the SPA One Plan. We prepareu
an initial draft based upon that document although we had to request phasing information
from Baldwin that was not included in the plan. We suhsequently received a revised SPA
One Plan dated April 21, 1995 which was reviewed and used to make refinements to our
draft PFFP. We have since prepared the extra documents identified in item number -+
above.
During this effort we have recorded on a daily basis our work hours on weekly timecards
which are then prepared in computer report format. As of November 19, 1995, our labor
costs total $52,245.00 and our expenses for printing, delivery, and mileage total $525.29 for
a grand total to November 19 of $52,770.29. We anticipate an additional 65 hours involved
in completing the PFFP following the receipt of final comments from the City Attorney's
Office, attending meetings, and making refinements to the document following Planning
Commission and City Council hearings. Additional expenses are estimated to be $650.00.
Labor and expenses to date plus estimated future labor and expenses results in a lump sum
fee of $61,220.00. This represents a change order request of $38,720.00 to our existing
contract.
\0 -~
Mr. Gerald J. JamrisJ..:a
Novcmher 19, 19()5
Page 3
r would appreciate your prompt consideration of this request. It is my understanding that
this request is scheduled to be considered hv the City Council on December 12. 1995. I
appreciate your and your staffs continued efforts in providing information for and review
of the PFFP. Should questions arise, please contact me at your earliest convenience.
Very truly yours,
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
~~
Thomas Bandy
Project Manager
JN07()31
c: Kim Kilkenny, Vice President, Otay Ranch LP
Angelique Lucero, Vice President, Willdan Associates
1 \)-/0
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM II
-
MEETING DATE 12/12/95
ITEM TITLE:
I~Jf/
Resolution accepting California State Library matching funds
awarded to the Chula Vista Literacy Team, appropriating funds, and
amending FY 1995-96 budget.
SUBMITTED BY: Library Director<tW [\ 1
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ ~\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes-1LNo...)
In 1987 the Library received a five-year l:lalifornia State Library grant to establish the Chula
Vista Literacy Team. The fifth and fmal year of this funding was FY 1991-92. The
California State Library has announced another one-year extension of California Library
Services Act funding for programs which were awarded the original five-year grants. The
FY 1995-96 awards are based on a match of $1 for every $5.63 raised and spent locally
during FY 1995-96. This will provide $26,681 to the Chula Vista Literacy Team.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution accepting the grant,
appropriating the funds, and amending the FY 1995-96 budget.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On December 6, 1995 the Library Board
of Trustees is expected to vote to support the Literacy Team's application for FY 1995-96
CLSA Matching Funds.
DISCUSSION
As an extension of the original CLSA literacy grant, this $26,681 grant is intended to
supplement monies raised locally to support the Library's adult literacy program. Funds will
be used to continue the contract established last year with our computer lab coordinator,
who provides key support to the adult literacy learning lab at the Literacy Center, located in
the South Chula Vista Library. Funds will also be used to contract an instructor to lead the
popular, weekly, small group writing classes, to provide in-service support to tutors, and to
aid in the learner assessment process. Additional funds will be used to purchase office
equipment, (a printer and fax machine), instructional resources, and to cover a portion of the
costs of printing a new brochure. This plan has been approved by the California State
Library.
FISCAL IMPACT: Accepting this grant will provide $26,681 in FY 1995-96 to the Chula
Vista Literacy Team. These funds cannot supplant existing funds. (For matching fund
budget, see Attachment A).
1/-1
CLSA MATCHING FUNDS BUDGET
FY 1995-96
December, 1995
BUDGET ACCOUNT: 216-2161
5212 Printing $2,100.
5298 Other Contractual $19,280.
5321 Instructional Resources $1,700.
5324 Equipment $3,601.
TOTAL: $26,681.
/1',;2.
ATTACHMENT A
RESOLUTION NO.
/~/.5f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
MATCHING FUNDS AWARDED TO THE CHULA VISTA
LITERACY TEAM, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND
AMENDING FY 1995-96 BUDGET
WHEREAS, in 1987, the
California State Library grant
Literacy Team; and
Library received
to establish the
a five-year
Chula vista
1991-92,
another
funding
grants;
WHEREAS, the fifth and final year of this funding was FY
however, the California State Library has announced
one-year extension of California Library Services Act
for programs which were awarded the original five-year
and
WHEREAS, the FY 1995-96 awards are based on a match of $1
for every $5.63 raised and spent locally during FY 1995-96, which
will provide $26,681 to the Chula vista Literacy Team.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby accept the California State
Library matching funds awarded to the Chula vista Literacy Team.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the 1995-96 budget is hereby
amended by appropriating $26,681 into budget Account 216-2161 as
set forth in Attachment A.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
David Palmer, Library
Director
~~
B uce . B ogaar , C'ty
At orney
F:\home\attorney\literacy,grt
/ /-' '3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.:
J;2...
Meeting Date: 12/12/95
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution I Y/~~ Amending Fiscal Year 1995-96 Budget
to Establish Two (2) Intern III Positions (total 0.96 FfE) and
expand the existing Part-Time Temporary Expert Professional
position from 0.48 FfE to 0.75 FfE within the Department of
Building and Housing and appropriating $14,000 from Capital
Improvement Project GG-144 to Account 100-1320-5105.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Building and HOU~~l,,--
". \
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~~. .j;.)"'l\ (4/5th Vote: Yes_X_ No_)
. \ .----;\
Backeround: The Department of Buildin]' and Housing is seeking additional part-time
positions to facilitate implementation of selected programs administered by the Department.
This action represents a redirecting of resources within a Capital Improvement Project
previously approved.
RECOMMENDATION: City Council adopt Resolution to amend Department of Building
and Housing Budget for FY 96 by adding Two (2) Part-Time Temporary Intern III Positions
(Total 0.96 FTE), expand existing Part-Time Temporary Expert Professional position from
0.48 FTE to 0.75 FTE and appropriate $14,000 from Capital Improvement Program fund
GG-144 to Account 100-1320-5105.
Fiscal Impact: $14,000 through FY 96. Funding source has been previously authorized by
Council approval of CIP No. GG-144. Total long term additional staff costs arising from
this action, based on continuing appropriation at a level that would allow completion of
projects by December, 1996, will not exceed $23,700 including the $14,000 recommended
in this agenda statement.
BWR:bwr
(C:\wp51 \admin\^13intn4)
I~-I
RESOLUTION NO.
1B'15~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1995-96
BUDGET TO ESTABLISH TWO (2) INTERN POSITIONS
(0.96 FTE) AND EXPAND THE EXISTING PART-TIME
TEMPORARY EXPERT PROFESSIONAL POSITION FROM
0.48 TO 0.75 FTE WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF
BUILDING AND HOUSING AND APPROPRIATING $14,000
FROM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GG-144 TO
ACCOUNT 100-1320-5105
WHEREAS, the Department of Building and Housing is
seeking additional part-time positions to facilitate implementation
of selected programs administered by the Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby amend the fiscal year 1995-96
budget to establish two (2) intern positions (0.96 FTE) and expand
the existing part-time temporary expert professional position from
0.48 to 0.75 FTE within the Department of Building and Housing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $14,000 is
hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance of CIP No. GG-
144 into Account 100-1320-5105.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~
Kenneth G. Larsen, Director
of Building and Housing
C:\rs\Intern.ada
1.2 "rJ..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item__~ -3
Meeting Date 12/12/95
/Y/52
ITEM TITLE: Resolution EXERCISING THE CITY'S OPTION TO RENEW THE R.
F. DICKSON STREET SWEEPING AGREEMENT ON THE SAME TERMS AND
CONDITIONS FOR SIX MONTHS (JAN 1,1996 THRU JUN 30,1996) AND
DIRECTING THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS DELIVER A COPY
HEREOF TO THE CONTRACTOR.
SUBMITfED BY: Director Of Public wo~ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-1L)
On September 22, 1992, the City Council approved a contract with R. F. Dickson, Inc., to
provide citywide street sweeping services. The agreement provided for three years (January 1,
1993 thru December 31, 1995) of street sweeping with the contract price to be adjusted each
year by the San Diego Area CPI and any changes in tipping fees. In addition, the agreement
provided that the City could extend the contract in incremental periods for up to two additional
years using the CPI increase or a price mutually agreed upon by both parties. The contract was
structured in this manner since five years is the capitalization period for street sweepers. The
contractor agreed in a letter dated November 3, 1995, to keep the current prices for calendar
year 1996.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution renewing the agreement with R. F.
Dickson for street sweeping for the period January 1, 1996, thru June 30, 1996.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION: The contractor has done a good job during the first three years of this contract.
The company has been responsive to citizen's complaints and has worked with staff to provide
good service at a reasonable price. In fact, the current price, which has been adjusted by
increases in tipping fees and the CPI over the last three years is still lower than the original
prices quoted by three of the other four bidders. Since Dickson's original rates ranged between
2% to 11% lower (depending on the service) than the remaining bidder, staff believes that
Dickson's rates are reasonable. Consequently, staff believes that rebidding at this time would
serve no useful purpose and recommends that Dickson's contract be renewed for the remainder
of the Fiscal Year (thru June 30, 1996). Under normal circumstances, staff would have
recommended that the contract be extended thru December 31, 1996. However, since the
contract requires a 120 day notification to the contractor for service reductions and due to the
uncertainty concerning the FY96-97 budget, the June 30, 1996 date is recommended.
FISCAL IMPACT: As Council may recall, the frequency for residential streets was
decreased from biweekly to once per month, commercial streets to once per week, and parking
lots to once per month during adoption of the FY95-96 budget. Consequently, only $201,850
was included in the 95-96 budget for street sweeping services for the year, while the original
contract was for $292,440 for one year. Approximately half was encumbered for July thru
December 1995. The remainder will be used for January thru June 1996.
A TT ACHMENTS
Exhibit A Agenda Statement from Council Meeting on September 22, 1992.
Exhibit B Letter from R. F. Dickson, Inc., dated November 3, 1995.
I:J / I /(3 -~
RESOLUTION NO.
I ~/57
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA EXERCISING THE CITY'S OPTION TO
RENEW THE R. F. DICKSON STREET SWEEPING
AGREEMENT ON THE SAME TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR
SIX MONTHS (JANUARY 1 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1996)
AND DIRECTING THAT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS DELIVER A COPY HEREOF TO THE CONTRACTOR
WHEREAS, on September 22,
approved a contract with R. F. Dickson,
street sweeping services; and
1992, the City Council
Inc. to provide citywide
WHEREAS, the agreement provided for three years (January
1, 1993 through December 31, 1995) of street sweeping with the
contract price to be adjusted each year by the San Diego Area CPI
and any changes in tipping fees; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the agreement permitted two
additional one year renewals using the CPI increase or a price
mutually agreed upon by both parties; and
WHEREAS, the contract was structured in this manner since
five years is the capitalization period for street sweepers and the
contractor agreed in a letter dated November 3, 1995, to keep the
current prices for calendar year 1996.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby exercise the city's option to renew
the R. F. Dickson Street Sweeping Agreement on the same terms and
conditions for six months (January 1 through June 30, 1996) and
directing that the Director of Public Works deliver a copy hereof
to the Contractor.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
~
C:lrsldickson,ext
) 3-- :J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ztem~--
Keeting Date: September 22, 1992
ITEM TITLE: A. Resolution Iii 8"1 I, Accepting Proposals and Awarding
Contract for citywide Street Sweeping Services
January 1, 1993 through December 31, 1995 to
R.F. Dickson, Inc.
a Resolution I ~ K'l? Approving Fourth Amendment to
, the citywide Street sweeping Agreement with
Laidlaw Waste systems, Inc., to provide street
sweeping services through December 31, 1992.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of PUblic~rks~~~t
REVIEWED BY: city Manager rC ~ )/(4/5thS Vote: Yes No_li_
On September 15, 1987, the City Council approved a contract with
Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. to provide citywide street sweeping.
The agreement provided for three years of street sweeping with the
contract price to be adjusted each year by the San Diego Area CPl.
In addition, the agreement permitted two additional one-year
extensions upon satisfactory negotiation of a contract price to
provide citywide street sweeping services through August 31, 1992
for the second and final year extension. On August 25, 1992,
Council approved a third amendment extending the contract through
October 31, 1992.
Subsequently, proposals for street sweeping services were received
on August 28, 1992. After a complete evaluation, staff is
recommending award of the street sweeping contract to R.F. Dickson
Co., Inc. who submitted the lowest contract price. Seventy-five
days are needed for delivery of equipment, routing and the start of
the new contract. Therefore, staff is also recommending extension
of the current contract with Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. through
December 31, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
A) That the City Council adopt the resolution awarding the
citywide street sweeping contract to R.F. Dickson Co., Inc.
for street sweeping services January 1, 1993 through
December 31, 1995.
B) That the City council a40pt the resolution approving the
fourth amendment to the citywide Street Sweeping Agreement
with Laidlaw Waste systems, Inc., which would extend that
agreement through December 31, 1992 and provide for
compensation of $14.58 per curb mile.
/'. a~~Exh/b/!- 11
J;l--> ~'
xeetinq Date: 9!~~
paqe 2 :Item ~
BOARDS/COKKISSIONS RECOKKENDATION: Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION: The city entered into a three-year agreement with
Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. for citywide street sweeping services
on September 15, 1987. The agreement was for the period beginning
september 1, 1987 through August 31, 1990. The agreement allowed
for extension on a year-to-year basis not to exceed two years. The
final year of the agreement expired on August 31, 1992. However,
a two-month extension through October 31, 1992 to provide for
evaluation of street sweeping proposals was granted on August 25,
1992. At the time of the 2 month extension, Laidlaw indicated
street sweeping service after October 31, 1992 would have to be at
the new proposal price of $14.58 a curb mile. Currently, we pay
Laidlaw $14.02 per curb mile. Extension of Laidlaw's contract
through December 31, 1992 is to be paid at $14.58 a curb mile.
Staff is requesting the two-month extension of the street sweeping
contract with Laidlaw Waste systems due to a manufacturer's delay
in the delivery of street sweepers to be used by the new
contractor. In order to provide quality service and preserve their
company's image, the new contractor prefers to wait until the new
equipment has arrived and a local field office established before
commencement of services. After discussions with the contractor,
staff believes this will assure a smooth transition from one street
sweeping service provider to another. As you may recall, this is
the first time a new contractor has been selected since we began
contracting out street sweeping services in 1984.
On July 31, 1992, the City issued a request for proposal soliciting
proposals from qualified firms to provide street sweeping services
for a three year period with a possible extension of the Agreement
on a year-to-year basis not to exceed two years. The first year of
the contract is to be paid at the proposals' price. The second and
third year of the contract are to be adjusted up to a maximum of 6%
per year based on the July to July CPI for the San Diego region
which is published in August of each year. The fourth and fifth
years are negotiable and the city's decision on renewal would
depend on the outcome of negotiations. In the past, a fair price
for the fourth and fifth year has been set based on staff's
evaluation of the contractor's performance and service and a survey
of neighboring cities and the price paid for street sweeping
services.
/J'?
~
xeeting Date: 9/22/92
Page 3 Item y
/
staff had waited until July 31, 1992, to put the contract out to
bid because of the uncertainty surrounding the state budget which
potentially might have resulted in a reduction or elimination of
street sweeping. Proposals were accepted until 2:00 pm on Friday,
August 28, 1992. The City received bids for 4 alternatives
including: A) Full service, B) Half service, C) street sweeping
reduced by 25% and D) Street sweeping service with a possibility of
up to 100% reduction upon a 120 day notice. After evaluation of
the proposals, staff found that alternative D was misinterpreted.
In an effort not to re-bid, alternative D was thrown out. Staff is
recommending acceptance of alternative A providing for full street
sweeping services and award of the contract to the low-bidder R.F.
Dickson Co., Inc.. Alternative A provides for the same level of
service and practices pertaining to street sweeping as are
currently provided by Laidlaw. Dickson has agreed to include a
clause in the contract to allow up to a 100% reduction in street
sweeping services upon a 120 day notice if the City's financial
condition warrants a reduction in services. Attached is a summary
of alternatives received for each proposal. The following table
summarizes proposals received for Alternative A:
TOTAL
COST/CURB MILE
$ *VARIES
13.50
14.58
14.90
*VARIES
14.89
R.F. Dickson Co., Inc.
Cannon Pacific Services
Laidlaw Waste systems, Inc.
California Street Maintenance
BFI Services Group, Inc.
City of Chula vista
Kenny's Construction sweeping
$292,440.55
315,508.79
340,540.58
346,695.23
525,119.47
346,725.42
NON RESPONSIVE
*See attachment for price per curb mile.
Consistent with past Council direction, city staff also evaluated
the possibility of providing the service in-house. cities
throughout California who still provide in-house street sweeping
services were surveyed and findings compared to Chula Vista. The
cost of providing street sweeping services in other cities was
13- '/
~
xeeting Date: ~2
Page" Item
considerably higher than the bid amounts we received. Additionally,
the results of our own analysis indicated it was more costly to
provide the service in-house. In order for the City to provide
street sweeping services, we would need to hire 3.5 street sweeper
operators ($165,365), purchase 4 street sweepers ($472,000), pay
dump fees for the disposal of street sweeping debris ($31,000) and
provide for anpual maintenance and operating costs ($40,000).
These costs are based on information received from other comparable
cities and manufacturers regarding the purchase of equipment. The
equipment cost for 3 sweepers would be spread over a 5 year period.
The cost of the fourth sweeper which serves as a back-up would be
spread for a longer period of time. The street sweeper operator's
salary is comparable to a senior street maintenance worker. The
part-time position would be used as a relief, for vacations, sick
leave and floating holidays.
As the City's bid for providing street sweeping would be about
$346,725 for calendar year 1993 as compared to $292,440 for the
contractor, it is more cost effective to contract for the service.
R.F. Dickson Co.. Inc.
R.F. Dickson Co., Inc. has been in the street sweeping business for
42 years, serving cities ranging in size from 6,000 population to
over 100,000. The length of contracts with other cities range from
one to five years in duration. Their main office is located in
Downey, CA. with a maintenance facility in the City of Santee.
Dickson would provide for the same level of service and practices
pertaining to street sweeping which currently exists in the City.
Upon award of the contract Dickson will locate a new maintenance
facility and field office in the South County and will purchase 3
new (Mobile) street sweepers and maintain a back-up sweeper. Due
to a manufacturer's delay Dickson anticipates arrival of the new
equipment wi thin 75 days. steve Dickson, President of R. F. Dickson
Co., Inc. will be the city contact. An 800 number will also be
provided to residents in the event of street sweeping inquiries.
Prior to commencement of the new contract we plan to issue a press
release and release an article in the Chula vista Quarterly
informing residents of the new street sweeping contract.
1,3-Y
~
xeeting Date: 9U3J.92
page 5 Item ~
FISCAL IXPACT:
The cost of street sweeping services are reimbursed by Gas Tax
funds resulting in no impact to the General Fund. The total
contract for providing street sweeping services for one year is
less than the total price of last year's street sweeping contract.
A total of $335,510 is budgeted for FY 1992-93.
A) The cost of this extension of contract amendment with Laidlaw
Waste Systems, Inc., through December 31, 1992 is $56,000. The
total contract costs to be paid to Laidlaw Waste Systems,
Inc. for the first 6 months of FY 1992 are $170,000. These
funds are included in the FY 1992-93 operating budget.
B) The contract cost with R.F. Dickson, Co., Inc. for providing
street sweeping services for 6 months of this fiscal year
(January through June 30, 1993) is $155,000. This includes 2.2%
contingency for the addition of new streets during the calendar
year. These funds have already been appropriated in the FY
1992-93 budget. street sweeping funds for the remaining six
months of the first year's contract will be budgeted in fiscal
year 1993-94. subsequent years of the contract will be
reflected in future budgets.
J ;/---1
y
;;:;:-';0;';-; ';: :
() C\I "I::" 8 8 0 10 10 8 8 15
~ ,.... ~ II! ~ I- 10 ,.... ,.... .. " !z
a: ~ oj z c:i .0 c::i ui oj ." c:i .0 c:i
w .;:..
~ w c:o C\I tR- ..... l8 'en w ~ ~ ~
::> > 10_....::....: W ~ ~ ~ i iw ~
0 <( as <j
0:: _I c( ,.... co ;: 0: I ~o: I
0 ~ () ~ ~ Y:~~ 0 ~c( 0
en c:( '> c(
w ~ c5 ~ ~~ ~
() ::> 0
~ 0 15 W!:o: ,0:
~ z w ~o... w
w 0 it w w
en ~ en x" en
() ....
u: en ~:
m w
C\I ..... ..~ 0 8 l;l 0"> ~ ..... 8 l;l ~
~ ..... ..... <~ 0 .....
Iii c:i .0 <.~ c:i ..j c:i ....: .0 i ....: c:i
C( ~ co .:T""" co ; <h l;l co ..... ~
w ,...._ .~; tR- ~ ,.... ~
Z ::lE 0:: C1l- co:. :; ci cD
Iii ~ ..... C\I T""" . .:' C\i .....
0 ..,. ~ ::
~ W J: ~ .....:; ~ .:
0:: t; : .:~~~j~ '~j
:::J ~ co c( :!:!:
CD c( () .-::~;: :::::
~ Z ~ <i ~li!:i!: ::~~
0:: w Z ;*~
...J 0 ~ w ~I~
c( IL. 0 .~!~j
en ::i CD 0::
0 c( 0; c( 'I
0- () "
0 co 8 c:o 0 co ~.: c:o 8 c:o 10
a: en C") 10 ..... ~ . '. C') C') ~
0- ::lE i ....: ..j c:i . ..+: . ....: cD
en w N 0">1:: ..... co ; ~ ~ ~. :, c:o co ..... c:i
~ ..... ~ ~+::j; tR- ~ ~
W 0; N ~I~ cD
0
:> >- 0; C\I C\i ..... '.~:.
en C")
a: w <( tR- ~
UJ ~ ()
C/) ~ ..... ~ . t~~~
C!) ~ :::
en . ?::: ~~~
Z ~ ~ :> 0':-:'
a:: , ...:-:.: t
UJ m :5 I
w 0 cj ::> ~t
~ 5 J:
en c..: ()
ti:i co 0 15 0"> ~ ~ .:~~ It) 8 ~ C1l
en 0"> 0 0 :c:o 0
UJ w ~ -ri:: - .0 C':i c::i cD cD ::.";~ C':i g C':i c:i
a: c:o .,.. :. C")
() ~~~ ~ ; tR- c:o ,.... . ..... ..... tR-
I- ~ 0"> ..... 10 ::.~~ ~ ~
C/) ..,. as g ~~
...J W ~ C1l '::;j
c:( en C\I . :~ .....
:::J () Iii ~ ~[llll' ~ ":'::
Z u: I
z <3 w .(
c( 0:: ()
c( ~
D- en . ~iil
z - ~
0 ~ ~t~~~
z z
z <3 '::::
~ ~ z W ..~~
w :::*
C") ~.:.::~~I~ 8 0 0"> ~ C\l ..:::: .. 8 10 ~
l- ." ~
u ..... 10 0 ~ :; " "-
c:i Z .0 C':i c:i i ....: it .0 C':i c:i
..... 'en
~ ~ c:o ~ -,',:w W co ..... ~ ~ ::;11 w co ..... ~
~ cj w ~ ~ tR- ~ ~ ~ ~
c.. ~ ~ cD Iff,g...::! 0: I g .n I
() ,.... . '. c( 0 ..... 0
0 C\I ;>
0 z ~ ~ ~ c( ; ~
C\i 0 0:: ~:~* W ~ :~ W
en 5 ~ en ;~fQ en 0
@> ~ .0: <
() () w .da: w
C\I 15 .,. z () 'm~ w 0 -0- W
C1l ~ ~ ~ w ~ " w
C1l u: ~1. : en " en
..... a:: w w -.
..... en ::.;<< en ."
as ,'l:
C\I ..J $: IL.
..J tt ..J
I- ::> ~ c( ~
en IL. ~di J:
:::J 0:: W a: w
C!) < 0 ..J t Q:i en 0 ..J t
:::J w ~ :E 0 w b ~ :E 0
c( ~ ..J m ~ ..J
0:: ~ a: ~ 0:: en ~ a: ..J c( a: m en
0 w 8 z 8
en w ffi ~I~ ::> ~ w ffi " ::> ~
w 0 Z D- Z. .~ () 0 0 ..... D- Z 0 0 ...
Z D- o:: ~ ~-'.J~ E J: j::: 0:: ~ 2 E J: 2i j:::
w w w w w
0 ~ a: 0 0:: a: ~ ~ ~ 0:: 0 0:: a: ~
0- 0:: 0 ~ 0 w ::> 0 0 c( 0 w ::>
0 D- c( () c( D- () () c( () D- c( D- O ()
J:J -/0 Y
() C\I 10 ~?;1 ... 0 0 0 a fAh 8 0 0
~ '.' " ~~.:;:.:: i
,.... ,.... 0'; .. I- 0 0 10 I- 0 10
c..:- ~ oj oj . ::.- Z g .0 c::i ui Z g .0 c:i
w ~ l8: "~~ m w C\I ~ ,.... f:R ;;; en w C\I ~
::> > ~ ~ ..... ~ ~
0 c( as cD :.....:w ~ 16 - ",':w ~
c:: ...J tS ,.... ~ $0: I R1 ~ ""0: I
" ~ ~ :: c( 0 . 'f; c( 0
en ..;> c( ~ ;> S
w ~ 8 ".:w ~ .w
() ::> ~iO .0
~ 0 15 Ii 0: '0:
w z z ,,$, 0- W ~~ W
- 0 w w
en ~ :c:~ .. en en
() 'x .. .."
u: en ..... it "
m w :~~ 'ili'.
C\I ..... 0 10 0"> ~ ..... MIO 8 10 ~
~ ,.... ..... 0 ~ 0 ~ '. .~ ~
Iii cD .0 '. c:i .0 c:i c:o ll'" '; cxi i cxi c:i
< 0 co <0 ..... ~ c:o co '..... ..... ~
w ..... "":.. ..~i~ ~ ~ C") ,.... ..;.J. .,. ~
Z ::lE c:: N co :: ,..: cD :~
Iii ~ ,... a ..... ..... .....
0 ..,. :; C\I ~
~ W J: ~ I ~ ;If.j
c:: ~
tn c(
:::J ..... ()
CD s; ~ <i I::"~: .!t,1
~ Z :.::;:1:;:;
c:: w Z .-:.:.:-:.
...J 0 ~ W ::~::~:
c( I.L 0 I""'" ~:ll
en ::i CD c:: ~~~
0 c( 0; <(
0- () 0 ~dl~
0 C\I 8 c:o 0 co 0 ~ 0
a: en ,... 0 ..... ,... 0 .....
0- ~ r--: cD c:i ui . .... . oj fj c:i
::lE N ~~:~
en w ..... ~~g::"'" co c.; ~ C\i 0 ~
~ ~ ..... ~
w 0; g ~II~ a; ~
0 >- 0; C\I .....
~ en ~ 10
W tS ~ .:
W tn ......;.;
en ,... g 1.111 III
c.:... ~ ~
z ~ ~ :>
a::
w m :5 il;1 ;111
w 0 cj ::>
~ 5 J:
en c..: () ~~:;o
I- f:R 8 0 0 co ~ ~\15 8 0 0
UJ en . If": ,... ~ 10
UJ cxi c:i c:i cD . ',,;c.. .. .0 ~ c:i
r:t: w ,...... :. C") C") ,.... :: c:o
() 10 ~W! c.; co c.; ~ c:o ~:I;~~ c:o ~
I- ~ C") ~ ..... ~ .....
en ..,. 8 g ~ ., tR- ~
...J W ~ .....1: w
c( en ~ j:~;li () ...
:::J () Iii ~
z u: w ~ 1m ~ ~:'~
z [5 a: z ~
c:( c( ~ f ~
a.. ui
z - ~ 0
0 tn z :"::l ~
Z in
z [5 .* ~ ..~:
(S ~ Z .:*~
w ~~L ~
C") ~ 8 15 ~ ~ C\I ~ 8 10 ~
0 ..... ~ ':".11& ,...
g .0 M c:i 0 ... c:i .0 M c:i
~ ~ ~/":lw UJ co c.; ~ ~ C\I ~ W ~ c.; ~
~ ~ ~ ~ 10 ~
d w ~ cD 16 .,.::; 0: a.. g It'i ......:: 0: 0
0- ~ I ::> I
() "* ,... ..... . :. c( 0 ... . .!:~ 0 w
0 10 C\I ',~ > 0 ..... t
0 z ~ tS C\I ~ S w ~ .-:: ~
N 0 c:: () ..,':w W
en :5 ~ >- ::> ::0 -:l
@! ~ CD < w
() () 0 .0: c::
C\I 15 ..,. z 0 UJ W .0... W
C1l ~ ~ w UJ c:: . " w en
C1l u.: 0 en w '" W w
... Ii ::l m &. en
- '" z
as 0 0 .:.:~ 0
C\I W ...J a..
I- a: ~ ::> en
en 0 0 ~ w
:::J c:: w () c:: w c::
C) W 0 ...J t 0 ~ 0 ...J t 0
:::J > ~I~ ~ :i 0 w ~ :i 0 w
~ g. .::J~ ...J ~ g ...J ~
c:( c:: a: c( c:: ~ en !;;( a: c( a: ~ en !;;(
l" 8
0 ~,~ z w en ,,~, ~ z ::> w en " z ::> ~ 8
w ..) a: a.. Iii ~ ,"~i ~ 0 0 ~ ~ z a.. Iii ~ 0 0 ~ z
z E J: c:: E J: m c::
UJ .1- W ~ w w 8 w w
0 S a: a:.~en 0 c:: a: ~ ~ 0 c:: c:: ~
0- c:: 0 ~ ~>.: !;8 0 w ::> 0 0 w ::> 0
0 a.. c( () c( a.. () () c( () c( a.. () () c(
,.,
/.:1 -// y7
10 ~ ~ 0"> 10 10 0 15
C\I I"- ~ l"- I"- 0
M C\i C\i ..... M M c:i M
~ ..... ... ~ ; ~ ~ ;
0 tR- tR-
W
>
~
Z
c::
W
~
c(
"
"
W
>
~
Z
a:
W
!:J
c:(
Cl
Z
c(
en
en
:5
o
C!)
z
a::
W
W
~
en
>-
CD
W
...J
~
CD
a:
:::J
o
~
en
o
o
()
w
~
!;(
Z
c::
W
~
<(
m
w
>
~
Z
c::
W
~
c(
c(
W
~
!;(
Z
c::
w
~
<(
W
D-
~
W
o
Zen
o~
li:tlj
W~
:!:o
en~
~>-
UJa:
a:W
1->
enw
~
..1.
I:
",:",:.
~:~:;:~:~:~
~::::::::::
*;::~::::
c::
w
en
o
D-
O
c::
D-
~
r--
C\i
;
10
C\I
M
.....
tR-
~
r--
C\i
;
w
o
z
o
I-
0...
W
~
en~
~tl1
W~
a: a:
I-UJ
en 0-
~
C\I
C\i
;
~
.....
;
V
I"-
C\i
~
~
C\I
C\i
;;;
~
C\i
.....
~
~
.....
;
o
~
Ii:
W
~
en~
enw
tLiUJ
W~
a: a:
~W
en 0-
/ :J -/-2-
w
w
a:
I
I-
Ii: [5
WW
~:!:
en a:
enW
tLio...
Wen
a:UJ
~~
en I-
0">
0">
.....
~
C1l
C1l
...
.....
tR-
0">
0">
.....
.....
tR-
en
Z
c(
is
W
~
~~
CZ
ZO
:5~
en 0:::
a:~
Ww
1-0
~Z
00
10
C\I
M
;
10
?"-
M
.....
tR-
10
C\I
M
.....
tR-
~
Z
enO
~~
::iff]
a: 0-
WUJ
1-0
~z
00
10
C\I
M
;
10
?"-
M
~
10
C\I
M
;;;
~
enW
WW
z:!:
::iff]
a: 0-
WUJ
1-0
~Z
00
~
o
o
c:i
~
o
o
c::i
~
o
o
c:i
~
~
~~
eno
@~
ma:
O:::w
:::Jo...
c.;>w
ZO
QZ
ZO
o
10
M
;
o
10
M
.....
tR-
o
10
M
.....
tR-
~ c:o ~ LO ~ ~ ~ C\I
co co ~
oj ui M cD N c:i c:i C\i
C\I C\I C\I ; ~ ~ ~
0 tR- tR- ~ tR-
W
~
~
Z
c::
W
~
c(
oj<
oj<
W
>
~
z
a:
w
~
c(
o
z
c(
en
C/)
:s
o
C!)
z
a::
UJ
w
~
C/)
>-
CD
W
...J
~
CD
r::r:
:::J
o
~
en
o
o
()
W
~
~
Z
c::
w
~
c(
m
w
>
~
Z
c::
w
~
c(
c('
W
>
~
Z
c::
w
~
c(
W
Q.
~
w
o
Zen
o~
I-W
o...W
W~
~o
~~
Wr::r:
a:W
tn~
'I
E....
I
f}:':'
II!
c::
w
~
Q.
o
c::
Q.
~
..j
C\I
tR-
o
~
ui
C\I
~
~
..j
C\I
~
W
o
Z
o
I-
0...
W
~
en~
~ttJ
w~
~ffi
en 0...
co
C')
N
C\I
~
8
c:i
~
10
C\I
..j
C\I
~
C")
r--
C\i
~
co
C")
N
C\l
~
8
c:i
C\I
~
o
~
I-
0...
W
~
en~
enUJ
tLiw
w~
a: a:
~w
en 0...
w
W
r::r:
I
I-
I-~
o...UJ
wW
~~
en a:
~~
Wen
a:W
I-~
en I-
/3'0
o
10
.0
.....
~
10
0">
ui
.....
w
o
10
Iri
.....
w
C/)
z
c(
15
W
~
ol5I
en I-
OZ
ZO
:s~
en a:
-W
r::r:o...
~W
zO
wZ
00
10
....:
C\l
~
o
~
oj
C\I
~
10
.....
....:
C\I
~
~
enO
~~
::iffi
r::r:0-
WUJ
~O
~Z
00
y
10
co
.0
C\l
~
10
c:o
....:
C\I
~
10
co
.0
C\l
~
~
UJ
ffiW
z3:
::iffi
a: 0-
~~
wZ
00
10
co
.0
C\I
~
10
c:o
....:
C\I
~
10
co
.0
C\I
~
~
WI
~~
00
W~
CD a:
r::r:W
:::Jo...
qw
ZO
OZ
zO
10
.....
cD
;
10
CO
oj
.....
~
10
.....
cD
.....
~
RESOLUTION NO. 16816
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ACCEPTING PROPOSALS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING SERVICES JANUARY 1. 1993
THROUGH DECEMBER 31. 1995
WHEREAS. the following six proposals for street sweeping services were
received at 2:00 p.m. August 28. 1992 by the Purchasing Agent:
R. F. Dickson
Cannon Pacific Services
Laidlaw Waste Systems. Inc.
California Street Maintenance
BFI Services Group. Inc.
City of Chula Vista
Kenny.s Construction Sweeping
$292.440.55
315.508.79
340.540.58
346.695.23
525.119.47
346.725.42
Non Responsive
WHEREAS. upon evaluating the proposals. staff recommends awarding the
contract to the low bidder. R. F. Dickson. who has assured the City that he is
a licensed contractor in the State of California who can produce an acceptable
performance bond.
NOW. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby accept the six proposals received for Citywide street sweeping
services for the period January 1. 1993 through December 31. 1995 and awards the
contract to R. F. Dickson. known as document number C092-158. a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the City
of Chula Vista.
Presented by
ruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
rf;!; CP~
lrector of Public Works
1;S-'/Y
Resolution No. 16816
Page 2
PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chul a
Vista. California. this 22nd day of September. 1992, by the following vote:
YES:
Councilmembers: Horton. Malcolm. Moore. Rindone. Nader
NOES:
Counc i 1 members: None
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Counc i 1 members: None
Counci lmembers: None
__- 1
C /' ./-/
""-~...::- /' / /-:'./ /
Tim Nader. Mayor
ATTEST:
"
i
\
" ' "
,
", \
Vicki Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) SSe
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16816 was duly passed. approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 22nd day of September. 1992.
Executed this 22nd day of September, 1992.
'\-\ '\ . (\ \.;' ..'--1
". \ ~ .l., , " . <.\ '-l..) ,
Vi cki Soderqui st. Deputy City Cl erk
13~)>
_"_ '" -'::"L
EXHIBIT 35
'';'~.!'FJ'Vk',~'''""
- --
November 3, 1995
Mr. David C.Byers
Deputy Director of Public Works/Opertaions
City ofChula Vista
707 F Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Dave:
Thank you for taking the time to meet with me yesterday.
In an effort to assist the City of Chula Vista with its budget planning, or any shortfall you may be
experiencing, we would like to offer the following:
Extend our contract from 1/1/96, through 12/31/96, we will hold our current rate for sweeping.
We believe this extension would be mutually beneficial. It is our goal to provide the City with the
finest service possible, and at the same time promoting a public-private partnership. I look
forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely,
RF. DICKSON COMPANY, INC.
~
Steve Dickson
President
SD:lp
Chula V&li.ext
:~" -~,/
I ~,-1 ~ ~_~___.__________~____
R.F. Dickson Company
Municipal Sweeping
Construction Clean-up
Sweeper Sales
Parts and Service
12524 Clark Avenue
Downey, CA 90242
310/923-5441
800/573-3222
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J i
Meeting Date 12/12/95
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution IT/5K'
for Transit Services
Approving Uniform Fare Structure Agreement
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~
The Uniform Fare Structure Agreement incorporates three major cooperative functions among area
transit operators under Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) jurisdiction: a cash fare
structure; transfer procedures; and regional tickets and passes, including distribution of revenue
among operators. This agreement, which has been in effect since 1981, usually is amended annually
due to changes in cash fares or prices for regional passes. The FY 1995-96 agreement was approved
by the MTD Board of Directors on October 12, 1995. The primary changes to the agreement for FY
1995-96 are price increases for some regional passes, including the Coast Express Rail, and County
Commuter Express Bus services. MTDB requires participation in this agreement as a condition for
receipt of Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds in accordance with Section 99284 of the
Public Utilities Code.
RECOMMENDA TION: That Council adopt resolution approving Uniform Fare Structure
Agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
This agreement coordinates transit service for fixed route and dial-a-ride transit operators under
MTDB's jurisdiction receiving TDA Article 4.0 and 4.5 funds. Coordination functions include
transfers among operators, establishment and maintenance of a uniform fare structure, and revenue
distribution to operators from regional tickets and pass sales. The following fixed route operators
participate in this agreement: County of San Diego Transit System (CTS); MTDB contract
operators; National City Transit (NCT); North County Transit District (NCTD); San Diego Transit
(SDT); San Diego Trolley (SDTI); and Chula Vista Transit (CVT). The TDA Article 4.5 funded
dial-a-ride operators, including Chula Vista HandYtrans, were added to the agreement in FY 1992-
93 to provide Complementary Paratransit Service for the Article 4.0 funded fixed route operators
in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). ADA certified passengers may
transfer between fixed route and dial-a-ride services by paying the appropriate fare as specified in
the agreement. The fares differ depending on the fixed route system used and the distance traveled.
/'1- /
Page 2, Item J Y
Meeting Date 12/12/95
The primary changes to the FY 1995-96 agreement are price increases of some monthly passes,
including the Coast Express Rail, and County Commuter Express Bus services. Most CVT riders
who purchase monthly passes use the following three types: Local/Urban Zone pass; Senior/
Disabled pass; and Youth pass, none of which were changed for FY 1995-96. These passes permit
unlimited ridership on regional bus systems and the Trolley. The LocallUrban Zone pass is $49; the
Senior/Disabled pass is $12.25; and the Youth pass is $24.25. Cash fares also remain the same,
which on CVT are: regular adult fare, $1.00; senior/disabled fare, $0.75; youth fare $0.75; and
special fare on Route 7061706A ("Downtowner"), $0.25.
Participation in this agreement enhances coordination among various operators in the region,
resulting in better service to the public, and also provides a mechanism for distributing regional pass
revenues among operators. Pass sales revenue is distributed among operators based on passenger
boardings. For example, CVT drivers record each passenger who boards a bus with a pass. At the
end of each month, total revenue from pass sales in the region is divided among operators based on
each operator's percent share of total pass boardings.
FISCAL IMPACT: CVT's share of regional pass sales revenue in FY 1994-95 (fiscal year ending
June 30, 1995) was $652,859 or approximately 47% of CVT's total fare revenue of $1,378,662.
Staff estimates that CVT will receive approximately this same per cent of regional pass revenue in
FY 1995-96.
BG:Fi1e No.:OS-O 19/08-032
Attachment: Uniform Fare Structure Agreement
M: \home\engineer\agenda\fareagm t. "mg
JY,;l..
RESOLUTION NO.
/~ I~r
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE
AGREEMENT FOR TRANSIT SERVICES
WHEREAS, the Uniform Fare Structure Agreement
incorporates three major cooperative functions among area transit
operators under MTDB jurisdiction: a cash fare structure; transfer
procedures; and regional tickets and passes, including distribution
of revenue among operators; and
WHEREAS, the agreement, which has been in effect since
1981, usually is amended annually due to changes in cash fare or
prices for regional passes; and
WHEREAS, the primary changes to the Aagreement for FY
1995-96 are price increases for some regional passes, including the
Coast Express Rail, and County Commuter Express Bus services; and
WHEREAS, this agreement was approved by the MTD Board on
October 12, 1995 and participation in this agreement is a
requirement for receipt of Transportation Development (TDA) funds
in accordance with section 99284 of the Public utilities Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve the uniform Fare
structure Agreement for Transit Services, a copy of which is on
file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be
completed by the City Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby author i zed and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director
of Public Works
C:\rs\uniform fare
/t/-3
1255 iT;-,erla! /1.verue Su::" 1000
San Dlf'::)o CA 92101-7490
i6'(.1) 231-1466
FA>:: ~C~J 234-:)~:-:-
November 15t 1995
J
~r~
"\ \~ c~ J'
.J " \
(}>",'
l'
COUNCIL OffiCES
CHULA VISTA CA
SRTP 875 (PC 262)
The Honorab~e . Nader
Mayor
City of ChU a Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mayor Nader:
Subject:
MTDB DOC. NO. T0265.0-96; UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Enclosed is a copy of the above-referenced document approved by the MTD Board
of Directors on October 12t 1995. Please obtain approval and the appropriate
signatures for this document and return the signature pages (2) marked
"original" to MTDBt Attention: Inez Gonzalez.
Upon all signatures being acquired from the respective agenciest a fully
executedt certified copy will be sent to you for your records.
If you have any questionst please contact Jennifer Williamson at 557-4514.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
Sincerely,
~l\~~
~ Inez M. Gonzalez
Administrative Analyst
IMG:jy
L-UFSA96.CPl
Enclosures: Uniform Fare Structure Agreement
Signature Pages (2)
cc: Jennifer Williamsont MTDB
~,/(.....-,t-i- :"':~e"'''<:f-~
/Y,5"
~ - a'" \ ~-,
v~l~i c. 1. E Cdior, c~. 1 '-'-1 [;E' ',;::; Sea _~ C', ! ~a Mt>'
:-)u"" :=:';_l' :'-:-f"~_ "', .~, cd ::a
l :...f'"
:"-)"'..-'\':- ':,' r\j;:~ 1.1 '- '." , ',=:~ ~_'...a" C:. ., Sa" Co, ....::.
~/t:-:' 'ar "Tra'<:-,-t LJt'.,,: ~_~""".;-"! B'__..(1":~ r--
:-,1 :r-. ~/et. ,'~
1(:"-"'- 'C ,
Rt'~~. j ,4
.. :'_~-:3:':{'-'-'" :',::'1'. S~'':~: ~
SL;t,S:::;
CC>fpC"'::;';,',. . ~,cr off--: T'a"'-''-,It C,~_/~
.-:.. ~..a' '"""-'.'
~
~~",-:; lit c...: 1
'" --,'
:>:. t..':ZC1:la E2~,lf-"~ ~.":1'^ [.,-'''-;;='2--,
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
City of Chula Vista
Date:
/'1~7
-29-
<<3~\U\~~\.
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
CHULA VISTA TRANSIT
Chairman of the Board
City of Chula Vista
Date:
-~
" .
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
City of Chula Vista
Date:
/'1.- g-' -31-
U\\\G\"M.
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
CHULA VISTA HANDYTRANS
Chairman of the Board
City of Chula Vista
Date:
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 262)
FY 96 UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE
AGREEMENT
SECTION 1: PURPOSE AND RESPONSIBILITY
1.1 Intent
This Agreement is entered into, between and among the transit operators
listed in Sections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2, the Senior/Disabled Dial-A-Ride
operators for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Complementary
Paratransit Services listed in Section 1.1.3, the Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB), the North San Diego County Transit Development
Board (NSDCTDB), and the San.Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG)
for the purpose of formalizing the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS)
Uniform Fare Structure.
The Uniform Fare Structure is intended to enhance public convenience and
help the public understand that the operators listed in Sections 1.1.1,
1.1.2, and 1.1.3 function as a single unit.
1.1.1 Fixed Route Ooerators
Chula Vista Transit (CVT)
County Transit System (CTS)
MTDB Contract Services (900 Series)
National City Transit (NCT)
North County Transit District (NCTD)
San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC)
San Diego Trolley, Incorporated (SDTI)
1.1.2 General Public Dial-A-Ride Ooerators
E1 Cajon Dia1-A-Ride (CTS)
La Mesa Dial-A-Ride
San Diego Transit DART
Spring Valley Dia1-A-Ride (CTS)
1.1.3 Senior and Disabled Dial-A-Ride Ooerators
MTS Access
Chula Vista HandYtrans
National City WHEELS
CTS Senior and Disabled Services (for East County, South Bay,
and Mid-County)
~9
1.2 Backaround
1.2.1 In accordance with the requirements of Section 99282.5 of the
Public Utilities Code, the MTD Board of Directors and the SANDAG
Board of Directors adopted resolutions on June 23, 1980 and
July 21, 1980, respectively, establishing a Transfer Policy for
all operators receiving Article 4 Transportation Development Act
(TDA) funds in the MTDB and SANDAG jurisdictions. As a result
of these actions, a Master Transfer Agreement was originally
executed between and among MTDB area operators and NCTD on
July 1, 1981 and subsequently amended, as appropriate,
fulfilling the intent of coordinating transit service within the
region.
1.2.2 To further coordinate transit service, the Regional Ready Pass
Agreement was originally executed on July 1, 1981 and renewed,
as appropriate, to provide for acceptance, administration,
sales, and revenue distribution of the regional Ready Pass.
1.2.3 A Uniform Fare Structure was also established in the MTDB area
in July 1981 providing for coordinated base fare levels for
local, Urban, Express, and Dial-A-Ride services. In July 1988,
the Regional Ready Pass Agreement, the Master Transfer
Agreement, and agreements related to the acceptance,
administration, sale, and revenue distribution of $1.50 10-Pack/
$1.75 10-Pack tickets and Day Tripper passes were formally
incorporated into the Uniform Fare Structur~ Agreement.
1.2.4 The ADA became federal law in July 1990. MTDB submitted an ADA
Complementary Paratransit Plan to the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) in January 1992. The plan, signed by the
transit operators listed in Section 1.1.1 (except NCTD), sets
forth the requirements and fare structure for the complementdry
paratransit services, to be operated by the Dial-A-Ride services
listed in Section 1.1.3. NCTD has submitted a separate ADA
Complementary Paratransit Plan to the FTA for its area of
jurisdiction.
1.3 Mutual Aareement
As a result of the background described in Section 1.2, it is mutually
agreed among all operators, MTDB, NSDCTDB, and SANDAG that this Uniform
Fare Structure Agreement is established, which incorporates a base fare
structure agreement, a transfer agreement, and an agreement for regional
tickets and passes.
1.4 Responsibilitv for Maintenance of Aareement
Maintenance of this Agreement shall be the responsibility of each of the
operators and shall be a condition for continued receipt of TDA funds in
accordance with Section 99284 of the Public Utilities Code. Through
cooperative agreement, MTDB and SANDAG s~~ll monitor the implementation
and maintenance of this Agreement.
-2-
/~-/P
1.5 Term
This Agreement shall become effective October 1, 1995 and shall be in
effect until amended by MTDB, SANDAG, and each of the operators. NCTD
may withdraw from this Agreement with ninety (90) days notice.
1.6 ChanQes
Each operator shall give MTDB, in its area of jurisdiction, and SANDAG
sixty (60) days notice, in writing, before a desired change to the
Agreement may be implemented. No change shall be made without the
consent of MTDB, SANDAG, and each of the operators.
SECTION 2: DEFINITIONS
2.1 Service Definitions
The following definitions shall apply to MTDB area operators only.
These definitions do not apply to NCTD:
2.1.1 Local Service. Fixed route bus service on local roads serving
neighborhood destinations and feeding transit centers in the
immediate area. NCT, CTS, CVT, and some MTDB contract operators
operate Local service.
2.1.2 Urban Service. Moderate-speed, fixed route bus service
primarily on arterial streets with frequent stops. SDTC and
some MTDB contract operators operate Urban service.
2.1.3 Exoress Service. Fixed route bus servicp with stops only at
major transit centers, residential centers, and activity
centers, has more than six stops outside Centre City or at
collector end of route, generally travelling less than
50 percent of the one-way miles on freeways, and averaging at
least 12 miles per hour, with an average trip length of
approximately 10.0 miles or under, and uses standard transit
buses. SDTC and some MTDB contract operators operate Express
service.
2.1.4 Premium Exoress Service. Fixed route bus service with stops
only at major transit centers, residential centers, and activity
centers, has more than six stops outside Centre City or at
collector end of route, generally travelling 50 percent or more
of the one-way trip miles on freeways, averaging at least
15 miles per hour, with an average passenger trip length of over
10.0 miles, and uses standard transit buses. SDTC and some
MTDB contract operators operate Premium Express service.
2.1.5 Commuter Exoress Service. Fixed route bus service with stops
only at major transit centers, residential centers, and activity
centers, generally travelling 50 percent or more of the one-way
trip miles 01 freeways, averaging at least 25 miles per ~our
-3-
/~'ij
with an average passenger trip length of over 10.0 miles, and
uses commuter coaches. CTS operates Commuter Express service.
2.1.6 Dial-A-Ride Service. Service available to the general public
that does not operate over a fixed route. The service is
dispatched through telephone requests from patrons. El Cajon
Dial-A-Ride (CTS), La Mesa Dial-A-Ride, San Diego Transit Direct
Access to Regional Transit (DART), and Spring Valley Dial-A-Ride
(CTS) operate Dial-A-Ride service.
2.1.7 Paratransit Service. Service limited to senior and disabled
passengers that does not operate over a fixed route. This
service is dispatched through telephone requests from patrons.
The Coordinated Transportation Service Agency (CTSA) oversees
such services.
2.1.8 ADA Comolementarv Paratransit Service. Specialized curb-to-curb
transportation services provided to persons who qualify as
eligible for such services under the guidelines of the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 and as specified in the MTDB
Regional ADA Complementary Paratransit Plan. Except for
commuter bus, commuter rail, or intercity rail systems, each
public entity operating a fixed route system shall provide
paratransit or other special service to individuals with
disabilities that is comparable to the level of service provided
to individuals without disabilities who use the fixed route
system.
2.1.9 Dedicated Transoortation Service. In relation to social service
agencies or other organizations, a dedicated transportation
service is defined as paratransit vehicle usage that is set
apart for and guaranteed to an agency for the transportation of
its eligible clients. The vehicle, for a particular time frame,
is for the definite use of these persons, and a ride is
unavailable to other eligible persons within the community.
2.1.10 Rural Service. Scheduled service operated in rural areas over
fixed routes. CTS-Rural operates Rural service.
2.1.11 Licht Rail Service. Service provided by San Diego Trolley.
2.1.12 Soecial Service. Special services (such as the Stadium Bus)
operated by an individual operator. Special services are not
subject to the requirements of this Agreement.
2.2 Passencer Definitions
The following shall apply to MTDB area operators and NCTD to determine
eligibility for special fares.
2.2.1 Senior. Any person 60 years of age or older. Acceptable proof
of senior-fare eligibility shall be a Medicare card, a valid
driver's license, a state of California sen~~r identification
card, an MTS identification card, or an NC~J identification
-4-
/~,~
card. This definition applies to persons who seek to purchase
and/or use a Senior/Disabled monthly Ready Pass or Senior/
Disabled cash fare on fixed route transit or trolley services.
2.2.2 Disabled. Any person with a permanent mental or physical
disability. (NCTD only: any person with a permanent or
temporary disability. An NCTD Temporary Disability Card is a
red card with an expiration date.) Acceptable proof of
disabled-fare eligibility shall be an MTS identification card,
Medicare card, NCTD disabled identification card, state of
California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) disabled
identification card, or DMV placard identification card. This
definition applies to persons who seek to purchase and/or use a
Senior/Disabled monthly Ready Pass or Senior/Disabled cash fare
for fixed route transit or trolley services.
2.2.3 HelDer. Any person designated by and travelling with a
passenger with disabilities in a wheelchair as their assistant.
2.2.4 Youth. Any person 6-18 years of age (inclusive). Acceptable
proof of youth fare eligibility in the MTDB area shall be an MTS
youth identification card, a valid driver's license, or current
school photo identification card (through high school only).
NCTD shall control youth pass eligibility at the point of
purchase and may ask for proof of eligibility from boarding
passengers.
2.2.5 Child. Any person age 5 or under.
2.2.6 Personal Care Attendant. In relation to the ADA complementary
paratransit service, a personal care attendant is a person who
is designated by the ADA-eligible passenger to aid in their
mobility. The person may be a friend, family member, or paid
employee. A personal care attendant is not charged a fare on
the ADA complementary paratransit service vehicle on which the
attendant accompanies the ADA-eligible passenger, but may be
charged for non-ADA services. The need for and use of a
personal care attendant must be indicated at the time of ADA
eligibility certification.
2.2.7 Sworn Peace Officer. As defined in MTDB Policies and Procedures
No. 41, "MTS: Complimentary Services," sworn peace officers
will be allowed to ride on regularly scheduled MTS bus and
trolley routes without charge. This does not apply to NCTD or
to CTS Commuter Express service.
2.3 Other Definitions
2.3.1 Bus. Transit vehicle operated by CVT, SDTC, CTS, NCT, MTDB
contract operators, and NCTD.
2.3.2 Trolley. Light rail transit vehicle operated by SDTI.
-5- /;/"1;
2.3.3 Coast Exoress Rail/Coaster. Heavy rail passenger service
operated by San Diego Northern Railway.
2.3.4 Centre City San Dieao. That portion of downtown San Diego
bordered by Laurel Street to Interstate 5 (1-5) on the north,
Commercial Street to 1-5 on the south, 1-5 on the east, and the
waterfront on the west.
2.3.5 Station. That fixed site at which the San Diego Trolley stops
to load and unload passengers. The stops within Centre City
San Diego are considered one station.
2.3.6 ZoneCsl. For bus service, geographical areas are defined by
fixed boundaries within which particular fares are established.
Zone 1 is the central urbanized area of the San Diego region
bounded by the Mexican border to the south, the MTDB area of
jurisdiction limit to the east, the waterfront on the west, and
extending north along,Interstate 5 (1-5) to just south of
Carmel Valley Road and north along Interstate 15 (I-IS) to
Los Penasquitos Canyon (Mercy Road).
Zone 2 extends from the Zone 1 northern boundaries north to
Manchester Street along 1-5, and north to Lake Hodges/Pomerado/
Highland Valley Road along 1-15.
Zone 3 extends from the Zone 2 northern boundaries north to
Batiquitos Lagoon along 1-5, and north to Bear Valley Parkway
along 1-15.
Zone 4 consists of everything within the MTDB area of
jurisdiction north of the Zone 3 northern boundary.
The above zone definitions do not apply to NCTD. For trolley
service, a zone is the number of stations from the station of
boarding that a person may travel for a particular fare. For
ADA complementary paratransit service, a zone is the
geographical area defined by fixed boundaries within which
particular fares are established. The boundaries for the zones
are determined by'each of contracting agencies for the local
operator of the paratransit service.
For Coaster service, geographical areas are defined by fixed
boundaries within which particular fares are established by
calculating the number of areas traveled in a trip. Zone 1
consists of the Oceanside and Carlsbad stations. Zone 2
consists of the Poinsettia, Encinitas, and Solana Beach
stations. Zone 3 consists of the Sorrento Valley station.
Zone 4 consists of the Santa Fe Depot.
2.3.7 Transfers. The actions by passengers in which they leave one
bus, trolley, dial-a-ride, or ADA Complementary Paratransit
service and board a subsequent bus, trolley, dial-a-ride, or ADA
Complementary Paratransit service to complete their trips.
-6-
I~Y
2.3.8 Uoarade. An additional fare required to enhance the value of an
original fare (upon transfer) or a pass to travel on a higher-
fare bus, trolley, dial-a-ride, or ADA Complementary Paratransit
service.
SECTION 3: REGIONAL BASE CASH FARES
3.1 ScoDe
This section shall cover base fare levels for MTDB area fixed route
operators. This section does not apply to NCTD.
3.2 Cash Fare Levels
3.2.1 Local route cash fares shall be $1.00.
3.2.2 Urban route cash fares shall be $1.50.
3.2.3 Express, Premium Express, and Commuter Express route cash fares
shall be as follows:
Express Zone 1 · $1.75
Express Zone 2 - $2.00
Premium Express Zone 1 · $2.00
Premium Express Zone 2 = $2.25
Commuter Express Zone 2 = $2.50
Commuter Express Zone 3 = $3.00
Zones shall correspond to bus zones as defined in Section 2.3.5
of this Agreement and as shown in Attachment A (map).
3.2.4 San Diego Trolley one-way cash fares shall be as follows and as
detailed in Attachment B.
Centre City
1 Station
2 Stations
3 Stations
4-7 Stations
8-28+ Stations
= $1.00*
= $1. 00
= $1. 00
- $1. 50
I: $1. 50
I: $1. 75
*Centre City cash fare allows unlimited rides within Centre City
(i.e., round trips) within a two-hour period.
3.2.5 Coaster Service one-way cash fares are calculated by the number
of zones traveled during a trip as follows.
-7-
1'I,1f
No. of Zones
Sinale Trio Cost
Senior/Disabled
Sinale Trio
1
2
3
4
$2.50
$2.75
$3.00
$3.25
$1.25
$1.35
$1.50
$1.60
3.2.6 Senior/Disabled cash fares on all routes shall be 75 cents.
There shall be no zone charges associated with Senior/Disabled
cash fares. This does not apply to the Coaster service.
3.2.7 Helper cash fares on all routes shall be 75 cents.
3.2.8 There is no regional youth cash fare.
3.2.9 Children (five years and under) ride free when accompanied by a
fare-paying passenger. The number of children allowed to ride
free will be determined by the individual operators. On an ADA
complementary paratransit vehicle, two children will be allowed
to travel free when accompanied by a full-fare passenger.
3.3 Soecial or Individual Ooerator Fares
3.3.1 CTS, NCT, and eVT may set youth cash fares of 75 cents. Proof
of eligibility for a youth cash fare (as specified in
Section 2.2.4) shall be required.
3.3.2 Individual operators may set cash fares for special services
such as stadium buses, shuttles, and promotional services. All
operators will notify Regional Transit Information and other
operators of any promotions put into effect.
3.3.3 eTS may set cash fares for the eTS Rural services.
3.3.4 Dial-A-Ride operators may set individual cash fares for
Dial-A-Ride services.
3.3.5 ADA Complementary Paratransit Service fares in the MTDB area of
jurisdiction are set in relation to fixed route services. In
compliance with the ADA requirements, the one-way fares for ADA
complementary paratransit services are set at double the fares
for comparable fixed route services.
Attachment C specifies the ADA local zone fares, and
Attachment D the ADA regional fares. Within the ADA
guidelines, the senior and disabled dial-a-ride operators listed
in Section 1.1.3 will retain local flexibility to establish
fares for social service agencies that purchase dedicated
transportation for their clients. This section does not apply
to NeTD.
-8-
/1~t
SECTION 4: REGIONAL TRANSFERS
4.1 Scooe
This section shall cover transfers between all Article 4 General Public
Dial-A-Ride operators, Article 4.5 ADA and Senior/Disabled Dial-A-Ride
operators, SDTI, and NCTD. It shall also define a policy for
participation in the regional transfer system by other transit
providers. And, it shall provide transfer policy guidelines between
fixed route bus service and ADA complementary paratransit services.
4.2 Transfer Slios
4.2.1 Bus and Dial-A-Ride Transfer Slio Soecifications
4.2.1a
4.2.1b
4.2.1c
4.2.1d
The paper transfer slip issued by each bus,
dial-a-ride~ and ADA Complementary Paratransit
operator within the MTDB area of jurisdiction shall
include the following information:
o designation of service type (Local or
Urban/Express);
o the cash fare paid;
o the route number or, for dial-a-rides, the
operator of the issuing vehicle;
o the direction of travel of the issuing vehicle;
and
o the date and time of day the transfer expires.
The transfer slip issued by NCTD's automated transfer
slip system for use within its area of jurisdiction
shall include the following information:
o route number;
o issue date;
o time of issue; and
o time of expiration.
All paper transfers issued in the MTDB area (including
transfers issued by dial-a-ride operators) shall be
punched or cut, as appropriate, by the driver. In the
MTDB area, drivers shall use a unique transit
hole-punch.
MTDB shall be responsible for printing these paper
transfers in the MTDB area. NCTD shall be responsible
for printing transfers in the North County area.
-9-
1~7
4.2.2 Trollev Sinale-Ride Tickets as Valid Transfer Slios
San Diego Trolley single-ride tickets shall be valid as transfer
slips, and shall include the following information:
o cash value of the trip for which the ticket is valid;
o station of boarding;
o the time the ticket expires; and
o the date the ticket was issued.
4.2.3 Soecial Transfers
Ready 2 tickets and 10-Pack tickets (for $1.50, $1.75, $2.50,
and S3.00) validated by SDTI vendomats shall be valid transfers
up to the time of expiration stamped on the ticket.
4.2.4 Transfers to Coaster.from fixed route buses. Passengers
boarding fixed route buses who pay a cash fare and are intending
to transfer to the Coaster should be issued a transfer. Cash-
fare-paying passengers boarding the commuter rail feeder
services should always be issued a transfer. This transfer
allows passengers to purchase a discounted one-way Coaster
ticket upon arrival at the station.
4.3 Transfer Charaes
These transfer charges will apply to transfers between and among MTDB
area operators and between NCTD and each other operator. For the
purposes of this Agreement, NCTD service shall be deemed equal to $1.50
"Urban" service. These transfer charges will not apply to transfers
within NeTD.
4.3.1 Transfer Uoarades
4.3.1.a Transfer slips shall only be issued when a cash fare
is paid or a 10-Pack ticket is relinquished.
Passengers with a valid transfer slip may transfer to
a bus or trolley with an equal or lower cash fare
value free of charge. Passengers with a valid
transfer slip must pay the difference between the
lower and higher cash fare in SO.25 increments when
transferring to a bus or trolley with a higher cash
fare value. Transfer upgrades range from $0.25 to
S2.00, and are detailed in Attachment E.
4.3.lb There shall be no transfer upgrade charges on fixed
route services for senior or disabled passengers.
4.3.1c Transfers made from a bus or trolley to a dial-a-ride
service listed in Section 1.1.2 of this Agreement
(excluding DART) will require a $0.50 upgrade fare
regardless of the cash base f?res charged on either
-10- )1~/Y
4.3.ld
service. NCTD shall determine its areas fare upgrade
regulations.
There are no transfer privileges between dial-a-ride
services listed in Section 1.1.2 of this Agreement. A
full fare is required upon each boarding.
ADA-eligible passengers with a valid transfer slip
from an ADA complementary paratransit service vehicle
may transfer to a bus or trolley without the payment
of a transfer upgrade charge. There will be a payment
of a transfer upgrade required from a bus or trolley
to an ADA complementary paratransit service. An
eligible passenger is a person with a disability who
has been certified as eligible under the Americans
with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the MTDB Regional
ADA Complementary Paratransit Plan. This does not
apply to NeTD.
4.3.le
4.4 Transfer Time
Transfer slips issued from MTDB area buses shall be valid within the
MTDB area until the date and time indicated on the transfer slip
(sixty [60] minutes from the terminal time of the route from which the
transfer slip is issued). NCTD shall set its own time policy for
accepting transfer slips issued from MTDB area bus~s. Transfer slips
issued from NCTD area buses and used to transfer tc MTDB area services
shall be valid for two hours from the time of issue (as shown on the
transfer slip). Transfer slips issued from ADA complementary
paratransit service vehicles shall be valid until the date and time
indicated on the transfer slip (the time indicated shall be two hours
from the time of drop off by the ADA paratransit vehicle, to the nearest
half hour). Passengers may exchange la-Pack tickets or tokens (on SDTC
and MTDB contract routes) for a valid transfer upon boarding the bus.
Single-ride and multi-ride trolley tickets shall be valid as transfer
slips until the date and time indicated on the ticket (two hours from
the time of purchase or validation). No transfer slips shall be issued
when a monthly or daily pass (as described in Section 5 of this
Agreement) is presented. Transfer slips issued in exchange for a
previously issued transfer slip shall be punched or cut by the driver to
be valid only until the time remaining on the original transfer slip,
unless an upgrade is paid. If an upgrade is paid (defined in
Section 2.3.7 as an additional fare required to enhance the value of an
original fare (upon transfer) or a pass to travel on a higher-fare bus,
trolley, or dial-a-ride service), the passenger travelling on the
higher-value service may be issued a new transfer slip with additional
time as stated in the first sentence of Section 4.4.
4.5 Transfer Directional Restrictions
Passengers with a valid transfer slip (as defined in Sections 4.?, 4.3,
and 4.4) may not make a return trip on the route, or on any rov'.e on the
-11-
/~Jq
same printed public timetable from which the transfer slip was issued.
Stopovers (reboarding the same route in the same direction) are allowed
(except on NCTD services), and there are no other directional
restrictions on transfers.
4.6 Transfer Centers and Points
Timetable coordination shall be established at the points shown on
Attachment F throughout the MTDB area of jurisdiction between and among
all operators and for as many routes as possible. A transfer shall be
considered time-coordinated if the scheduled meet is within six minutes.
4.7 Particioation in Transfer System
The policy for participation in the regional transfer system in the MTDB
area (as defined in Sections ~.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, ~nd 4.6) by
transit providers other than those included in Sections 1.1.1, 1.1.2,
and 1.1.3 shall be as follows:
4.7.1 Private operators participating in the regional transfer system
must operate a fixed route and fixed, published schedule.
4.7.2 Operators must serve an area or need not currently served by an
existing MTDB area operator.
4.7.3 Any publicly subsidized operator should be incorporated into the
regional transfer system to the extent feasible and practical.
4.8 ADA Comolementarv Paratransit Service Transfer Considerations
Under the guidelines of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
transfers between fixed route bus and trolley services can take place at
bus stop and station locations of choice of the ADA service passenger.
As long as the ADA passenger can board and/or deboard at a chosen stop
or station location, (i.e., the wheelchair lift can be deployed) there
are no restrictions as to ~here the passenger may transfer. Providers
may suggest, but cannot require, that transfers between fixed route
services and the ADA paratransit services take place at the major
transfer locations as shown in Attachment G.
The fare upgrade (from the fixed route bus or trolley to the ADA
paratransit service) will only be paid on the ADA paratransit service
vehicle, not on the fixed route vehicle. This is an exception to the
MTDB policy to allow passengers to pay transfer fares on the first or
second vehicle.
A transfer received upon any fare payment on a fixed route vehicle will
be worth a maximum of $0.75 toward the payment of the fare upgrade on
the ADA complementary paratransit vehicle.
A $12.25 Senior/Disabled Ready Pass or any other higher-value pass used
to board a fixed route vehicle will be worth $n,75 cents toward the
-12-
I 'I "e2~
payment of the fare upgrade on the ADA complementary paratransit
vehicle.
No 10-Pack tickets, Day Trippers, tokens, or other prepaid fare media,
as described within this Agreement, will be accepted as fare on the ADA
paratransit service vehicle.
The above considerations do not apply to NCTD.
Transfers between NCTD lift service and MTDB complementary paratransit
services are allowed. For ADA services, a transfer slip issued from
NCTD lift service shall be valued at $3.00 (double the $1.50 value as
established in Section 4.3).
SECTION 5: PASSES AND TICKETS
This section shall apply to fixed r~ute bus and trolley operators and DART
services only. General public and senior/disabled dial-a-ride operators do
not accept regional passes. "
5.1 ReQional Monthly Pass
5.1.1 Adult Monthlv Passes. The price of a regional adult monthly
pass (Ready Pass) shall be based on service type and zones.
Local and Urban Zone 1 passes shall be $49. Express Zone 1 and
San Diego Trolley passes shall be $49. Express Zone? and
Premium Express Zone 1 passes shall be $54. Premium Express
Zone 2 passes shall be $59. Commuter Express Zone 2 passes
shall be $62. Commuter Express Zone 3 passes shall be $67.
Commuter Express Zone 4 passes shall be $72. The adult monthly
pass shall entitle the person to whom the pass is issued to
unlimited rides during the month for which the pass is
designated on any equal- or lower-priced regularly scheduled
services. Half-priced monthly passes shall be sold beginning
the 15th day of each month at The Transit Store and Pass-by-Mail
only.
5.1.2 Senior/Disabled Monthlv Passes. The price of a regional senior/
disabled monthly pass is $12.25, and shall entitle the senior or
disabled passenger to unlimited trips during the month for which
the pass is designated on any regularly scheduled services.
Half-priced monthly passes shall be sold beginning the 15th day
of each month at The Transit Store and Pass-by-Mail only.
5.1.3 Youth Monthly Passes. The price of a youth monthly pass is
$24.50, and shall entitle the youth passenger to unlimited trips
during the month for which the pass is designated on any
regularly scheduled services.
Half-priced monthly passes shall be sold beginning the 15th day
of each month at The Transit Store and Pass-by-Mail only.
-13- ;'/_:</
5.1.4 Coaster Monthly Passes. Three Coaster Plus monthly pass types
will be available: Regular, Senior/Disabled and Youth. All
Coaster Plus passes will be valid for one calendar month and are
good on all fixed route service in San Diego county. They will
be available for purchase during the first and last ten days of
the month. Regular Coaster Plus passes will be good between the
zones designated on the pass only. Senior/Disabled and Youth
Coaster Plus passes will be discounted passes under the TransNet
subsidy legislation.
No. of Regular Seni or/Disabl ed Youth
Zones Monthly Pass Monthly Pass Monthly Pass
1 $80.00 N/A N/A
2 $85.00 N/A N/A
3 $90.00 N/A N/A
4 $95.00 $23.00 $47.00
5.1.5 Centre City San Dieao Passes. The Centre City San Diego-only
monthly pass shall be available to the general public. The
Centre City pass shall entitle the pass holder to unlimited
trips during the month for which the pass is designated, on any
regularly scheduled services provided within Centre City
San Diego (as defined in Section 2.3.3) by San Diego Trolley
only. The price of the Centre City San Diego-only pass shall be
$24.50. MTS AutoPark monthly parking permit holders shall
receive a 50 percent discount on the pass (discount to be
subsidized by the Regional Building Authority).
5.2 Soecial Reaional Passes
5.2.1 Dav Passes-General Public. The price of a one-day (1 Day
Tripper) pass is $5, and the price of a four-day (4 Day Tripper)
pass is $15, and shall entitle the person to whom the pass is
issued unlimited rides during the day(s) for which the pass is
valid on any regularly scheduled services provided by those
operators listed in Section 1.1.1 and the San Diego Bay Ferry.
5.2.2 Multi-Day Passes GrOUD Advance Sales. Multi-day passes, valid
for one to seven days, may be issued to groups on an advance
sales basis only. The price of multi-day, group advance sales
passes shall be as follows:
one-day pass · $4
two-day pass · $6
three-day pass - $8
four-day pass - $10
five-day pass - $12
six-day pass - $14
seven-day pass · $16
The multi-day (Day Tripper) pass shall entitle the person to
whom the pass ;s issued unlimited rides during thp corresponding
number of consecutive days for which the pass is valid on ahY
-14- .
1'1"',2;2.
regularly scheduled services provided by those operators
identified in Section 1.1.1 and the San Diego Bay Ferry.
Special events passes may be purchased in bulk in advance at
discounted rates as follows:
100-499 passes
500-999 passes
1,000-1,999 passes
2,000-2,999 passes
3,000+ passes
· Full price per pass
· 5 percent discount per pass
= 10 percent discount per pass
- 15 percent discount per pass
= 20 percent discount per pass
5.2.3 Classroom Day Triooer. Classroom Day Trippers are valid for
one day during nonpeak hours between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. ~n
weekdays or anytime on weekends. Classroom Day Trippers may be
issued to school and youth groups (up to 18 years of age) on an
advance sales basis only. Groups must be able to travel with a
maximum of 17 people ia minimum of two adult chaperons for a
group of 15 youths} per group, depending on bus or trolley route
capacity. The price of Classroom Day Trippers shall be SI.25
per person, and each passenger shall be issued a separate
ticket. The Classroom Day Tripper shall entitle the person to
whom the pass is issued unlimited rides during the day for which
the pass is valid, within the prescribed hours, on any regularly
scheduled services provided by those operators listed in
Section 1.1.1 and the San Diego Bay Ferry. Revenue for the
Classroom Day Trippers is allocated to individual operators on a
trip-by-trip basis split according to the trip itinerary
established by the purchaser of the Classroom Day Tripper.
5.3 Reaional Tickets
5.3.1 Bus/Trolley 10-Ride Ticket Book (SI.50 10-Pack). The price of a
bus/trolley 10-Ride ticket book ($1.50 10-Pack) is S14 and shall
entitle the person to whom the ticket book is issued ten (10)
trips of up to SI.50 cash fare value per trip on any regularly
scheduled services. For a trip on the trolley, the ticket must
be validated in the trolley ticket machine before boarding.
5.3.2 Bus/Trolley 10-Ride Ticket Book ($1.75 10-Pack). The price of a
bus/trolley 10-Ride ticket book ($1.75 10-Pack) is $17 and shall
entitle the person to whom the ticket book is issued ten (IO)
trips of up to $1.75 cash fare value per trip on any regularly
scheduled services. For a trip on the trolley, the ticket must
be validated in the trolley ticket machine before boarding.
5.3.3 Bus/Trolley IO-Ride Ticket Book ($2.50 10-Pack). The price of a
bus/trolley 10-Ride ticket book (S2.50 10-Pack) is $22.50 and
shall entitle the person to whom the ticket book is issued ten
(10) trips of up to $2.50 cash fare value per trip on any
regularly scheduled services. For a trip on the trolley, the
ticket must be validated in the trolley ticket machine before
boarding.
-15-
IfI~;;'3
5.3.4 Coaster IO-Trio Ticket Book. The price of a Coaster 10-trip
ticket book is based on the number of zones traveled through
during a trip.
Senior/Disabled
No. of Zones Reaular IO-Trio IO-trio
1 $22.50 $11. 25
2 $24.75 $12.35
3 $27.00 $13.50
4 $29.25 $14.60
SECTION 6: REGIONAL MONTHLY PASS UPGRADES
6.1 Adult Pass Uoarades
Passengers holding a valid adult monthly pass must pay a cash upgrade
to ride services that require a higher-value pass as defined in
Section 5.1.1. Pass upgrades range from $0.25 to $1.25 in $0.2~
increments based upon the difference in cash fares associated with each
pass. Attachment H details the pass upgrade charges.
6.2 Senior/Disabled and Youth Pass Uoarades
There shall be no cash upgrades required on Senior/Disabled and Youth
monthly passes for travel on any regularly scheduled services provided
by those operators listed in Section 1.1.1 of this Agreement (except CTS
Rural services - see Section 6.3).
6.3 Senior/Disabled Pass ADA Uoarades
There shall be a cash upgrade required on a Senior/Disabled pass, or any
other higher-value pass, if an eligible passenger transfers to an ADA
Complementary Paratransit service vehicle. This cash upgrade will be
the difference between the"$0.75 ride value of the Senior/Disabled pass
and the ADA complementary paratransit fares, ranging from $2 to $4 per
one-way trip. The cash upgrade will only be paid on the ADA
Complementary Paratransit service vehicle. This section does not apply
to NCTD.
6.4 CTS Rural Services
All passes, including Senior/Disabled and Youth passes, shall have a
$1.50 cash value when boarding or transferring to CTS Rural services.
SECTION 7: REGIONAL TICKET AND PASS ADMINISTRATION
-16- If'tJ.{
7.1 ~
This section shall cover the administration of printing, sales,
boarding counts, revenue collection, and revenue allocation for
Regular, Senior/Disabled, Youth, Day Tripper, and Centre City passes,
all IO-Pack tickets, and tokens. This section does not apply to general
public or senior/disabled dial-a-ride operators.
7.2 SANDAG ResDonsibilities
7.2.1 SANDAG shall ensure that each operator submits Ready Pass
boarding counts by category {Adult (all zones combined), Senior/
Disabled, and Youth) and all IO-Pack ticket counts (by ticket
type) to SANDAG on a monthly basis, using the form shown in
Attachment I. In addition, SANDAG shall ensure that those
operators operating Express, Premium Express, and Commuter
Express routes submit pass-boarding counts by route. SANDAG
shall also ensure that appropriate operators submit transfer
upgrade activity counts on Attachment I.
7.2.2 SANDAG shall determine the proportion of revenues from Adult
Ready Pass sales to be allocated to each operator on a
countywide basis in accordance with the formula shown in
Attachment J.
7.2.3 SANDAG shall determine the proportion of revenues from
Senior/Disabled and Youth Ready Pass sales to be allocated to
each operator on a countywide basis in accordance with the
formula shown in Attachment K.
7.2.4 SANDAG shall determine the proportion of revenues from all
IO-Pack ticket sales to be allocated to each operator on a
countywide basis in accordance with the formula shown in
Attachment L.
7.2.5 SANDAG shall submit the Ready Pass summary counts and allocation
percentages by category (Adult, Senior/Disabled, and Youth) and
all pass level and all IO-Pack ticket counts (by type) for each
operator to MTDB, instructing MTDB to disburse the Ready Pass,
Day Tripper, and IO-Pack sales revenue collected to the various
operators in accordance with the calculated percentages. SANDAG
shall submit said percentages and counts for the previous month
to MTDB by the 25th day of the month following.
7.2.6 SANDAG shall prepare a yearly summary of Ready Pass and all
IO-Pack ticket riders (by operator).
7.3 MTDB ResDonsibilities
7.3.1 MTDB shall fund and administer the design and printing of
regional passes and tickets.
-17-
IY'-2f
7.3.2 MTDB shall fund the regional prepaid fare program encompassing
the distribution and sales reconciliation of Ready Passes (for
Adult by price, Senior/Disabled, and Youth), Day Tripper passes,
Centre City passes, all IO-Pack tickets, pass-by-mail program,
and for San Diego Trolley, Ready 2 tickets, tokens (as well as a
pass sales effort directed at major employers). A Pass Sales
Administrator, employed by MTDB, ~ill be the coordinator of this
fare program.
7.3.3 MTDB shall prepare a monthly summary of Ready Pass (by category
and price), Day Tripper pass, Centre City pass, all IO-Pack, and
Ready 2 sales and net sales revenue, and shall submit a copy of
this summary to each operator (net sales revenue is the gross
revenue minus commissions to sales outlets).
7.3.4 MTDB shall determine the Day Tripper pass sales revenue to be
allocated to each operator based on the percentages of regional
Adult Ready Pass sales. as determined by SANDAG. An allocation
of 1.5 percent of the Day Tripper revenue shall be allocated to
the San Diego Bay Ferry prior to the remaining 98.5 percent
allocated to the other operators that accept the Day Tripper.
7.3.5 MTDB shall determine the proportion of TransNet Local
Transportation Sales Tax subsidy to be allocated to each MTDB
area operator for Senior/Disabled and Youth passes based on the
formula shown in Attachment M.
7.3.6 MTDB shall prepare a monthly summary of TransNet Local
Transportation Sales Tax subsidies for Senior/Disabled and Youth
passes or any other local jurisdiction subsidy by the end of the
month.
7.3.7 MTDB shall prepare J monthly summary of regional Ready Pass
(for Adult by price, Senior/Disabled, and Youth), Day Tripper
pass, Centre City pass, all IO-Packs, and Ready 2 revenue
distribution, including subsidies, and shall submit a copy of
these data and the SANDAG summary counts and allocation
percentages (Section 7.2.5) to each operator and to SANDAG when
issuing checks as described in Section 7.3.9.
7.3.8 HTDB shall keep a separate fund for all pass and ticket sales
revenues received, to include interest accrued on monies
contained in such fund.
7.3.9 HTDB shall issue a check monthly to each operator for its
portion of Adult (Ready) pass, Senior/Disabled pass, Youth pass,
Day Tripper pass, Centre City pass, all IO-Pack tickets, and
Ready 2 net sales revenues, TransNet Local Transportation Tax
subsidy (MTDB area operators only), and proportionate accrued
interest which exceeds MTDB costs for Pass Sales Administrator
compensation in accordance with instructions from SANDAG. (The
pass and ticket revenue check shall reflect the net amount to be
received by each operator after adjustment is made to allocate
transfer fares paid on first vehicles as described in
Attachment 1.) Checks for a particular month's revenue shall be
-18-
/~2?
issued for all funds received by MTDB during the previous month.
These checks shall be issued within five (S) working days from
MTDB's receipt of the SANDAG report as referenced in
Section 7.2.6. A reconciling report shall be sent to each
operator showing which month the money is from and any
adjustments (e.g., bad checks, theft, error).
7.3.11 MTDB shall bill local jurisdictions monthly for any subsidy
payments that may result from a reduced price monthly pass
program established by that jurisdiction, and apportion such
revenue to the appropriate operators.
7.4 Ooerator Resoonsibil~ties
7.4.1 Each operator shall count pass riders (by category: Adult (all
zones combined), Senior/Disabled, and Youth} and lO-Pack ticket
riders (by type). Operators shall count other prepaid fare
media (Day Trippers, Classroom Day Trippers) as feasible, based
on current farebox technology in use. Those operators operating
Express, Premium Express, and Commuter Express routes shall
count pass boardings by route for Express, Premium Express, and
Commuter Express services. Buses shall be equipped to permit
operators to maintain a daily count of each category and type of
rider. A record of daily counts shall be maintained and kept on
file for a one-year period. Such record shall be made available
to SANDAG at its request. For the purpose of lO-Pack ticket
revenue allocation, the lO-pack tickets shall be counted as
follows:
o A IO-Pack ticket received for fare payment that has been
validated by a San Diego Trolley vendomat is counted as a
transfer.
o A IO-Pack ticket received for fare payment that has not been
validated by a San Diego Trolley vendomat is counted as a
IO-Pack ticket for revenue allocation.
Daily pass and lO-~ack ticket usage on the San Diego Trolley
shall be determined on a sampling basis as prescribed by SANDAG.
7.4.2 Each operator shall prepare a monthly summary of pass riders (by
category and route, where applicable) and all IO-Pack ticket and
token riders (by type) using the form in Attachment I and submit
the previous month's summary to SANDAG by the 23rd day of the
month following.
-19-
/~~7
Each operator shall permit SANDAG ~ be the arbiter in case of
any questions on pass counts, and/~ANDAG shall justify its
decisio~ to operator(s) in ques7!on.
, ,
7.4.3
JSW:jsw:paw\lst
A-UFSA96.JSW
9/29/95
\,
Attachments:
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
1.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
o.
P.
~ ~
Expres$ Bus Zones, Routes, and Fares
San Di~o Trolley Zory<< Fares
ADA Com~lementary Paratransit Local Fares
\..-
ADA Comp~ementary Pi'ratransit Regional Fares
TransfertUpgrades !
Transit ~nters and Points
Paratranslt Transfer Sites
Pass Upgr~es ,
Regional P'ss, Ticket, and Transfer Upgrade Usage
Adult Pass ~ev.nue Allocation Formula
senior/Disa~_..l_ed and Youth Pass Revenue Allocation
Revenue All,ation Procedure for 10-Pack Tickets
Revenue Allo ation Procedure for Tokens
TransNet P~S'~, Subs i dy All ocat i on Procedure
Coaster Fare ~tructure
Coaster Zc)nes
Formula
-20-
/ '1- -2 ~
7.4.3 Each operator shall permit SANDAG to be the arbiter in case of
any questions on pass counts, and SANDAG shall justify its
decision to operator(s) in question.
JSW:jsw:paw\lst
A-UFSA96.JSW
9/29/95
Attachments: A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
o.
P.
Express Bus Zones, Routes, and Fares
San Diego Trolley Zone Fares
ADA Complementary Paratransit local Fares
ADA Complementary Paratransit Regional Fares
Transfer Upgrades
Transit Centers and Points
Paratransit Transfer Sites
Pass Upgrades
Regional Pass, Ti~ket, and Transfer Upgrade Usage
Adult Pass Revenue Allocation Formula
Senior/Disabled and Youth Pass Revenue Allocation Formula
Revenue Allocation Procedure for 10-Pack Tickets
Revenue Allocation Procedure for Tokens
TransNet Pass Subsidy Allocation Procedure
Coaster Fare Structure
Coaster Zones
-20-
1'1-.2 g"
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
rr'-- .-/J~ ~
~ -
General Counse
--
Date:
/?4~r
-21-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT
BOARD
MIS ACCESS ~
.... ~ ~#"-
General Manager
Date:
// ~ ~I^-
I tj, ,21
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Date:
-22-
/
/
/t
,-
;f
IMTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF
GOV.tRNMENTS
'J
Executive Director
Date:
I'I'JCJ
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
Date:
-23-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
CITY OF LA MESA DIAL-A-RIDE
Mayor, City of La Mesa
Date:
/0 ;II
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
North San Diego County
Transit Development Board
Date:
-24-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
NORTH SAN DIEGO COUNTY TRANSIT
DEVELOPMENT BOARD
Chairman of the Board
North San Diego County
Transit Development Board
Date:
/o/'J2
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
~~~:::--
Legal Counsel
San Diego Transit Corporation
~
~
Date:
-25-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION
SAN DIEGO TRANSIT - DART
Secretary of the Board
San Diego Transit Corporation
Date:
/1' J J
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
~~ ~ =-;J ~~
Legal Couns
San Diego Trolley, Inc.
Date:
-26-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
SAN DIEGO TROLLEY, INC.
Chairman of the Board
San Diego Trolley, Inc.
Date:
1'I"3~
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
legal Counsel
Date:
-27-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC-875)
COUNTY TRANSIT SYSTEM
Clerk of the Board
County of San Diego
Board of Supervisors
Date:
/?'-;r.-5
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
Date:
-28-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
NATIONAL CITY TRANSIT
City Manager
Date:
I'I;,Y?
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
City of Chula Vista
Date:
-29-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
CHULA VISTA TRANSIT
Chairman of the Board
City of Chula Vista
Date:
I 'I ~J 1
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
Date:
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
EL CAJON DIAL-A-RIDE
Clerk of the Board
County of San Diego
Board of Supervisors
Date:
-30- ;i/"3Y
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
City of Chula Vista
Date:
-31-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
CHULA VISTA HANDYTRANS
Chairman of the Board
City of Chula Vista
Date:
/Jj-Yl
'.
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
City Attorney
Date:
-32-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC-875)
NATIONAL CITY WHEELS
City Manager
Date:
J'I-'/tJ
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT
Approved as to Form:
Legal Counsel
Date:
-33-
MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
COUNTY TRANSIT SYSTEM
(Senior and Disabled Services)
Clerk of the Board
County of San Diego
Board of Supervisors
Date:
/~'r /
UNIFORM FARE STRUCTURE AGREEMENT MTDB Doc. No. T0265.0-96
SRTP 875 (PC 875)
Approved as to Form: SPRING VALLEY DIAL-A-RIDE
legal Counsel Clerk of the Board
County of San Diego
Board of Supervisors
Date: Date:
- 34- / 'I" 1 )..
Oceanside
Encinitas
,.
San
Marcos
-~--"
I Zone 41
Rt. 810 $72.. $3.00
Escondido
..
Carfsbad
.~.-
'-
-
Zone 3
----
-~
-.
\.
San Diego
'\.. Zone 1
:'. At. 210 $54., S2.OO
! \ At. 20 $41.. S1.~
:- '\ )
" .,
, .
., A
At. 30 149., $1.71 ./ [
At. 50"$49., S1.75\ .. ~
At. '50~8., $1.75\;' RL 27D 154., S2.DO
. /\ At. 40 154., $2.00
, \
I '. 70 9 $1.75
At. 850 and At 860
559., S2.25
At. 20 S54., S2.OO
,
At. 820 $62., ~o
Poway \
Zone 2
Del Mar
\
\
Santee ,).-
,.
~' ,.
At. no S62., S2.50'
/
j
EI Cajon
La Mesa
"
.~
./ Lemon
'. Grove
'-
....
Coronado
,
"-
'..
,
,
Chula Vista
Imperial
Beach
\. At. 830' SI2.. $2.50
.
~
l'
~
o
1
2 miles
MTDB
FIgure 2-7
ElleCiM 07mJ15
EXPRESS BUS ZONES,
ROUTES AND FARES
1'/"f,J
.......nd: ItOUla No.... .... ~
on.-WIIY CUta p.-
A TTACHMEHT 8
r' .
S&I Dlla) mLlZr ZOII .am
..... SoIU Ll.
krrto lanot- 'acific I.C. I.C. C.f. C.f. C.f. .. Irll 11m III
&.tu ... FlItt Itl St. 24~ St. I St. . It. Pll..., a". ,,,. II,.. tII80
GuilD/Con. Ctt. ~1.00 11.00 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 II. TS 11.15 11.75 .1.75 .1.TS
Con. Ctr. hit st.oo 11.00 11.50 11.50 st.50 11.50 . 11.50 'l.TS 11.75 11. T5 11.15 '1.75
s..Mrt 11.00 11.00 '1.50 11.50 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 11.T5 '1. T5 11.15 '1.75 'l.TS
lII,iel Plw st.OO .1.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15 11.15 11.15 at.15 11.75
Sotl 'e De"t 11.00 11.00 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15 11.15 '1.75 11.15 11.15
Little ntb '1.00 '1.00 '1.50 Sl.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.T5 11.75 Sl.T5 11.15 .1.15
Chte eeam 11.00 11.00 at.50 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15 11.75 11.15 '1.11 11.15
rlfU bill. 11.00 11.00 11.50 Sl.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15
CitJ Coil... 11.00 11.00 11.50 '1.50 11.50 11.10 11.50 11.75 11.75 '1.75 11.15 11.75
IlRilt , l2U 11.00 11.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.10 '1.50 11.15 II. TS 11.15 11.75 .1.15
-.rial I m. 11.00 11.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15 '1.75 11.75 11.15 11.15
limo I,not- Pacific I.C. I.C. C.I. C.I. C.f. Pala Iri. 11m III
LDtu .lU 'leet It. St. 24tl St. I St. I St. 'll.., ,,,. an. lid. t.lbo
Barrio i.G,u 11.00 11.00 11.50 st.IO 11.50 11.50 '1.50 '1.15 Sl.15 '1.15 11.15
l&riorIide 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.50 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 Sl.TS '1.75 11.75
't~lfic fleet '1.00 .1.00 11.00 '1.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 '1.75 11.75
lattDIl1 Clty-et. 11.50 11.00 11.00 11.00 st. 00 11.50 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.15
Il\tOlll CltY-24t. 11.50 11.50 11.00 11.00 '1.00 11.00 11.50 11.50 '1.50 11.50 '1.50
<<ltla ftlU-I St. '1.50 11.10 11.50 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 '1.50 11.50 11.50 '1.10
Qa1. flnl-i St. 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.00 '1.00 11.00 .1.00 aI.50 11.50 .1.10
hi.., 11.50 11.50 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 11.00 11.00 '1.00 .1.00 '1.50 lUO
h1a ,.... 11.15 11.50 11.10 '1.50 11.50 11.50 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.00 11.10
1m ,,.. 11.71 11.15 11.10 11.50 11.50 11.10 11.10 11.00 '1.00 11.. 11.10
.", 1194. '1.15 11.75 11.15 11.50 '1.10 11.SO 11.10 11.50 11.00 11.00 11.10
Sa I.tm 11.75 11.15 11.15 11.15 '1.50 11.10 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.00 'l.to
Iu'PiI IuWt- ..Uk I.C. I.C. C.f. C.I. C.f. hIa lria ..... ..
'- ri* fIItt III St. 2Ctl St. I It. lit. ..... bI. bI. 11ft. fllaw
IN , c.mial 11.10 ILIO 11.10 lUO 11.10 11.10 11.71 11.71 11.15 11.75 11.15 11.15
32M , ea.rcw 11.10 11.10 .1.10 11.1G 11.50 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.75
C7U St!'llt '1.10 11.10 11.10 11.10 11.15 '1.15 '1.71 11.11 '1.15 11.15 .1.15 11.11
bcW am. 11.1G 11.1G 11.1G 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 II. T5 11.75 11.75
aM St!ll\ 11.1G 11.1G 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.71 11.11 11.75 11.15 '1.71 11.11
"...matt. 11.10 11.15 11.71 11.15 11.15 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 '1.15 11.D 11.11
-. Qrm ... 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.71 11.11 11.15 11.15 11.75 11.11
_ill Stlllt 11.71 11.71 11.15 11.15 11.15 11.75 11.71 '1.15 11.15 II. T5 11.11 11.11
" .. 11.. 11.75 11.15 11.15 11.75 11.75 '1.15 II. T5 11.75 11.15 11.75 11.75 11.11
.....\ r.tft 11.15 11.15 11.15 '1.15 '1.'5 '1.75 '1. '5 11.75 11.15 II. T5 11.15 11.11
.... Irtft 'I.T5 11.15 '1.15 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.75 '1.15 11.15 '1.75 11.11
11 cu. Ir. en. 11.75 11.75 11.75 11.11 11.75 11.15 11.T5 '1.75 11.75 11.15 11.11 11.11
mrUlS.m
4/11113
N- /'/-1~
w FIRM Timuff ZM ribs
From Inside
G Im/
Co". Ctr. See-
laeries SuU It Little Civic
fifth
City
guilt -Loperial
Caen+. Cu.
vast
tort
liana
bw Italy Cater None
Collate i 1231 i 1231
Gulaw/cm. Co.
Can. CO. Yaet
$1.00 31.00
81.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 81.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.10
o
$1.00
81.00
$1.00
$1.00
11.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 11.00 11.00
$1,00
Awries Plana
$1.00
81.00 31.00
$1.00
$1.00 $1.00 11.00
81.00 $1.00 31.00
11.00 11.00 $1.00
$1.00 11.00
$1.00
Saito It Depot
Little Italy
11.00
$1.00 $1.00
81.00
$1.00 81.00
11.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00
11.00
$1.00
civic Cater
81.00
$1.00
11.00 31.00
11.00
81.00
$1.00
$1.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00
$1.00
Iiftl Neau
$1.00
$1.00
$1.00 31.00
$1.00
11.00
11.00 $1.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00
$1.00 $1.00 $1.00
81.00
City Collett
$1.00
$1.00 $1.00
$1.00
$1.00 11.00 $1.00
11.00
$1.00
$1.00
$1,00
$L10
31.10
"it i 12U
lowial i 12U
$1.00
11.00 31.00
$1.00
81.00 $1.00 $1.00
11.00 81.00
81.00
$1.00
11.00 31.00
$1.00
$1.00 81.00 $1.00
$1.00 $1.00 11.00
GUluP/ Con• W. Su•
Morita $ate to
Little
Civic
fifth
City
Buiet
Igaritl
Con. CU.
let
port
41au
Depot
Italy
Cater
Nerve
Collate
1 12th
1 12U
Ierrio Lots
Barbe»idc
81.00
11.00
31.00
$1.00
31.00
$1.00
11.00
11.00
11.00
$1.00
81.00
ileac
$1.00
$1.60
$1.00
31.00
$1.00
81.00
$1.00
81.00
$1.00
$1.00
81.00
$1.10
atiou
Istioul City -6t1
31.50
81.50
$1.50
31.50
11.50
11.50
$1.50
31.50
$1.50
11.50
$1.50
31.50
31.50
31.50
11.50
SI.50
$1.60
4tiael City -2131
Chia Bata -t St.
$8.50
31.50
31.50
$1.50
81.50
$8.50
$1.50
$1.50
11.50
$1.50
$1.50
$1.50
11.50
$1.50
$1.50
Gala List -1 St.
$1.50
81.50
$1.50
$1.50
31.50
31.50
11.50
$1.50
$1.50
11.50
$1.50
31.50
11.50
81.60
Felaau
11.75
31.75
31.75
$1.50
$1.75
11.50
81.75
81.50
11.15
$1.50
$1.75
31.60
$1.75
$1.50
31.75
$1.50
11.75
81.60
$LIS
Fell lvem
Iris Naas
$1.75
$1.75
11.75
11.75
$1.75
31.75
11.75
$1.75
$1.75
31.75
8L75
Bm Blvd.
$1.15
$1.75
31.75
81.73
$1.75
$1.15
81.75
81.75
81.75
81.75
$1.75
$1.75
$1.75
81.15
Sea Isidro
$8.75
$1.75
fLI5
$1.75
$1.75
u.75
$8.75
31.75
$1.75
$1.75
Si-75
$1.75
$1.75
$1.75
$1.75
31.75
$1.75
MIS
$1.75
Qulmi Clow. Cu.
Sae- iterica cuts fa
Little
Civie MU
City
Vrw lgeeial
am. CU.
Iest
pert
Phu
Depot
Italy
Clover Borne
Cellata
1 1211 1 1211
2511 1 Ca mereial
8Ld 6 Cemic
$L00
$1.00
31.10
$8.00
81.10
81.00
$1.10
iL00
ILK
81.10
ILK
al
1111 Street
81.00
81.10
81.10
11.10
81.00
81.00
11.00
81.00
81.00
51.10
:1.60
belid inns
81.60
u.60
11.50
81.50
81.50
$1.50
81.60
$1.50
SIM
ILK
ILK
81.60
ad strut
81.50
$1.50
$1.60
31.50
31.50
81.50
81.50
$LH
$1.50
$1.50
$1.60
81.50
8L60
$1.60
$L60
31.50
11.50
$1.50
$LV
ILK
rststetuetts
$1.50
81.60
81.50
$1.60
31.50
61.50
31.50
8L60
$1.50
$1.50
8L60
611100 IN" Duct
11.50
11.60
81.60
$1.50
11.60
$L60
11.50
$1.50
31.60
$1.60
8L60
grin street
11.75
81.15
SL75
$1.75
8L75
$1.75
81.75
SLTS
$1.75
31.75
8L75
La ran Blvd.
81.75
$1.75
81.75
11.75
$1.75
$1.75
81.75
81-T5
31,75
3LTS
81.15
@"now Dater
$1.75
3LI5
$1.75
$1.75
11.75
$1.15
$1.75
31.75
11.75
$1.75
$LIS
imoll Drive
81.75
SI.75
$1.75
11.75
81.15
$1.75
11.75
81-75
SLI5
$1.75
SL75
91 CON Ir. CU.
$1.75
11.75
$1.75
11.75
31.75
$1.75
$1.75
11.75
81.75
81.75
$L75
IKfI!lS.6'[1
4116/93
S&I D(IGO TIOwr %011 rms
r.. Iut LlIe
au I 32M I Cfll lleUd au Ia..uma- .... s,nq La... c,..\. AIm 11
Clre1. Cae!. SUltl &..... SUtt\ .'- 'Ie" Strttt Iltd. c.u .-- eu..
GuI_/Cm. Ctr. 11.00 11.00 '1.50 '1.10 '1.10 '1.50 . 11.50 11.15 11.15 11.15 .1.15 '1. T!
Con. C&r. I_ '1.00 '1.00 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 Sl.50 '1.50 '1.15 11.15 '1.15 '1.15 'L1!
SII"" 11.00 11.00 '1.50 11.10 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 11.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.1! '1.1~
.rica 'lua '1.00 11.00 '1.50 11.50 11.50 '1.50 '1.50 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 .1.15 '1.T!
Sua 't .... '1.00 '1.00 11.10 11.50 11.10 '1.50 '1.50 '1.15 '1.15 .1.15 11.15 11.15
LIUII [taU '1.00 '1.10 '1.11 '1.10 11.50 '1.10 '1.50 '1.15 '1.15 '1.75 .1.15 11.15
Cine Cater '1.00 '1.00 '1.50 '1.50 '1.50 '1.10 11.50 '1.15 '1.15 '1.75 .1.15 .1.15
'lfU b_ 'l.to '1.10 '1.58 '1.50 '1.50 '1.10 '1.10 11.15 '1.15 '1.75 .1.75 '1.75
Clt, CoU... '1.00 'I.GO '1.11 '1.50 11.10 '1.10 '1.50 '1.75 11.15 '1.75 11.75 .1.75
lut.l a l2U '1.00 '1.00 11.50 '1.50 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15
l..r1al I l%U 11.00 11.00 11.10 11.50 11.50 11.50 11.50 '1.15 11.15 .1.15 '1.15 '1.15
25" a 32M , Cft. IIC11d au lunch- Luo. 5"1.. wit.. 'Palt. &1m n
Carel. r.cl. StPltt btal Stn.t 11th Gml Strltl Iltd. euu, ..... ~.
luriD Lop: '1.00 11.50 11.50 11.50 '1.50 '1.50 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 '1.15 '1.75 '1.15
Ianon1de '1.10 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 11.10 11.15 '1.15 '1.75 '1.15 '1.15 .1.15 .1.75
'.Ute Flett 11.10 at.50 '1.50 11.50 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.15
latina! Clu-en 11.10 11.50 11.50 11.15 11.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 .1.15 .1.15
IItl0111 Clt'-24t. at. 10 11.50 11.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 11.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 11.15 .1.75
a.la fllU-1 St.. '1.10 '1.15 '1.75 11.15 '1.75 '1.1'S '1.15 '1.75 '1.15 '1.75 .1.75 '1.15
Chi_ 'lIta.. St. '1.1'S '1.1'S 11.1'S .1.75 '1.15 1l.1'S 11.15 11.15 .1.75 '1.75 11.75 .1.75
hi.., '1.1'S '1.75 11.15 .1.15 11.15 11.15 .1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.75 .1.75
hll &JIIII '1.15 '1.15 11.75 .1.15 '1.75 11.15 .1.75 11.1'S '1.75 '1.75 11.15 11.15
[ria &.... '1.11 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 11.15 'l.TS '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.15 .1.15
11m 11ft. '1.15 '1.15 .1.15 .1.15 '1.15 '1.15 '1.75 '1.15 11.15 '1.15 11.15 11.15
Sa r.ldN 11.11 11.15 11.15 .1.15 .1. 75 11.15 '1.75 .1.75 '1.15 11.15 .1.75 '1.15
.., 32M' 47U llelY au lutlen- "- S"iII La... Cl'IDt. ..,. a
Clrel. Clrcl. StNlt -- Sbltt IIUI .... Sbltt lIft. Caur '- CIMI
.. I .eo.ftW 11.10 11.10 .1.11 .ue '1.50 '1.10 11.50 .1.15 '1.75 11.15 1l.15
DId I eo.ftiIJ '1.10 '1.10 .1.. 11.11 '1.10 .1.10 '1.11 .1.50 .1.TS 11.75 11.15
Otl StNt, '1.. .1.10 II.. '1.. '1.50 '1.10 .UO 11.10 .1.10 .1.15 11.15
lle1id a,_ .1.10 .1.. '1.. 11.10 '1.11 '1.10 .1.10 .1.10 11.10 .1.11 '1.15
12M Stili' '1.11 lue '1.1t '1.. 11.11 .1.1t 11.. '1.10 .UO .1.11 .1.11
"'~,ebatU .1.10 .1.10 11.11 .1.. '1.1t 'l.GO ILGO ILIO .LIe lUO ,Ut
r... '"" .. .1.11 11.10 .1.. .1.11 'l.GO '1.11 11.10 '1.10 .1.10 11.50 IUO
s,m, 'tntl '1.50 '1.50 11.11 Il.iI I1.M '1.11 U.GO .1.10 11.00 .1.. .LII
" ... 11ft. .1.15 '1.50 '1.10 11.11 '1.11 '1.10 '1.00 '1.00 11.00 11.10 ILII
..... Caur '1.15 11.75 .1.50 .1.10 '1.50 '1.50 11.50 .1.00 '1.00 11.00 .1.10
._ Drift '1.15 11.75 '1.15 11.10 '1.9 11.50 '1.50 11.50 11.00 11.00 11.10
11 CUll tr. Ctr. 'l.TS '1.15 '1.15 '1.15 11.10 11.10 .1.10 lUO It.1O '1.00 .1.10
mJUIS.ftl
4111113 . . J ;t- Y?
ATTACHMENT C
ADA COMPLEMENTARY PARATRANSIT FARES
LOCAL ZONE FARES - MTDB AREA ONLY
MTDB AREA
South San Diego Zone 2 $2.00
Imperial Beach
Chula Vista
San Ysidro
National City
Coronado
San Diego (Central Areas) Zone, $3.00
East County Zone 3 $2.00
La Mesa
EI Cajon
Lakeside
Santee
Mid-County Zone 4 $2.00
Rancho Bernardo
Rancho Penasquitos
Cannel Mountain Ranch
Poway
Sabre SDrinas
ADA FARES
8/1/95
I~- (7
w_ 8
We a
a:::;,
~o
1-0
wi
C Z1;)
Oca
I- NW
Z
W
:E 8
~ o- M
(.) !~ 4IIt
<
l-
I- wO
< Zl
0:2
N:E
0 8
we! a
zc
Oe
wca
Z~
Of!
N_
e
.
0
8
N
4IIt
8
N
4IIt _
8
N
4IIt
8
N
4IIt
8
a
8
a
0
Q
.
is >- >-
w-
e - we a:>-
w8j 0; a:= =>>1
z_ ~8 %0 01
Of! ...0 ~.c
w- wi wi w-
ZC z:E z1;; :z=
o. 0:& o&fl 00
NO N N NCI)
8
a
8
a
8
a
.. ..-,-- ....
..................
.'........,.,..........
............. -'"'
.......... .-.,....
'..............'.-.
............... ..-....
......... ......'..
.......................................
.................. ..
":';':':';';':';':':':':':':';':':':'.'
.................
..:':i:li:!::;i:.:..I:.::::j1j::i:j1:
.".:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.".
;JJ!~~~!iJ!!iWtf@f
;::~~l}tri~~~i~~~~:i;;[i~~i i
".:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.:.;.:.:.;.:.;.:.::::
..............................'.....
...... .....-.. ....
.".:.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:..:.-:.:-:<.;.;.;.;.;.
.. .. ........
:;:::;::::;::::::::::::::.;::.
-,;.;.;.;.;.:..:
.......:.:.......
/'j-J/r
.} i
CI) CI)
CD~CDCD
"CfB~~
-! Co.e~
CI"x"ii)
5-g~C
~~~i
S~N('D
N 4IIt 4IIt Co
l5!!t=
-SSo
i:t:: :t:: Z
E!~~
"tJ1D!~
.J=___
fi!!:::
! !!t
;~e~
rJjZ~w
,.......,...............CS"
s..e...2._
-
LL
I
~
E
ci.
8
M
I
E
ai
8
(:)
--
-
~
m
Co
&t)
,....
N
4IIt
"tJ
C
ca
~
I
Co
I
:g
&t)
"":
--
4IIt
S
CD
(I)
as
!
u
oS:
Complementary Paratransit Service Zones
)1/- I
."
.
ATTACHMENT E
BUS AND TROLLEY TRANSFER UPGRADES
Transfer Uoarades
.50 .75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50
.50 Free .25 .50 .75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00
.75 Free Free .25 .50 .75 1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75
1.00 Free Free Free .25 .50 .75 1.00 1.25 1.50
1.25 Free Free Free Free .25 .50 .75 1.00 1.25
1.50 Free Free Free Free Free .25 .50 .75 1.00
1.75 Free Free Free Free Free Free .25 .50 .75
2.00 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free .25 .50
2.25 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free .25
2.50 Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free Free
JSW:jsw:paw
UFS-ATTE.JSW
8/15/95
/J/~
ATTACfIENT F
North County Falr
fWnona
J
\
-.
"\
o ,I)
. I
I '
I Lemon -
Grove .
.- ()spnng Valley
-.... .:-
.'
U 5....
........~... ....
MTDB
Figur8 5-6
/1/:57
. ExiIIing
o Propoeed (ExIsting Sou~ ~ Funding.
anti SaJell ax
- au. Unee
=== LIght Ad ~nuwit LInea
(TraIIey)
Transit Centers
. '.
1 ~~:~:_'~
ATTACHMENT G
DESIGNATED PARATRANSIT TRANSFER SITES
. -:t;.
For passenger and driver safety and convenience, operators may suggest that
transfers take place at existing transit centers, tro11ay stations, and major
shopping and medical facilities. The following transfer sites have been
agreed upon by all paratransit operators:
Transfer Sites
1. Alvarado Hospital
2. Marketplace at the Grove
3. Plaza Bonita
4. 8th Street Trolley Station - National City
5. Coronado - Tidelands Park .
6. VA Medical Center - Lifeline Transfer
7. Mira Mesa and Black Mountain Shopping Center and Ted Williams Parkway
JSW:jsw:paw/1st
UFS-ATTG.JSW
8/29/95
/ tj " 5;l..
ATTACHMENT H
REGIONAL PASS UPGRADES
Pass Value $49 $54 ssg $62 $72
Cash Equivalent $1.75 $2.00 $2.25 $2.50 $3.00
. Upgrade to Bus Cash Fare
$1.00 NR NR NR NR NR
$1.25 NR NR NR NR NR
$1.50 NR NR NR NR NR
$1.75 NR NR NR NR NR
$2.00 $0.25 NR NR NR NR
$2.25 $0.50 $0.25 NR NR NR
$2.50 SO.75 SO.50 $0.25 NR NR
$3.00 $1.25 $1.00 $0.15 so. 50 NR
All Trolley Trips NR NR NR NR NR
NR = None Required
Notes: Upgrades to DART services are $0.50 per trip.
All passes (including SeniorlDisabled and Youth) have $1.50 cash equivalent
when used to board SDCTS Rural Routes.
TDA 4.0 General Public Dial-A-Ride Services do not accept the RegionaJ Pass.
ADA Complementary Paratransit Services within the MTDB area of juJisdiction do
not accept the Regional Pass. except as a $0.75 credit towards the transfer
upgrade payment to the ADA complementary paratransit vehicle. This does not
apply to NClD. .
U-H.JSW
8/2/95
)1/-5)
ATTACHMENT I
REGIONAL PASS, TICKET, AND TOKEN USAGE
To be submitted to SANDAG
Operator
Month of
19_
I. Total number of ADULT monthly pass users carried:
1a. Total number by route for Express, Premium Express and Commuter
Express routes:
Route No.
Route No.
Route No.
Route No.
Route No.
Adult Pass Boardings
Adult Pass Boardings
Adult Pass Boardings
Adult Pass Boardings
Adult Pass Boardings
2. Total number of Senior/Disabled monthly pass users carried:
3. Total number of Youth regional monthly pass users carried:
4. Total number of $1.50 10-Pack Tickets received:
5. Total number of $1.75 10-Pack Tickets received:
6. Total number of $2.50 10-Pack Tickets received:
7. Total number of $3.00 10-Pack Tickets received.
MTDB Contract Services and SDTC Only
8. Total number of $1.50 Tokens received:
9. Total number of $1.75 Tokens received:
10. Total number of Transfer Upgrades. received:
· See Attachment I, page 2 for explanation
Compil ed by:
, 25t
, SOt
, 75t
. $1.00
Name
Date
I hereby certify that the figures stated above for regional monthly pass,
ticket usage, and transfer upgrades are accurate.
Date
Gellera1 Manager
11"51
EXPlANATION OF LINE 9. PAGE 1
REVENUE ALLOCATION FOR
TRANSFER UPGRADE ON FIRST VEHICLE POLICY
Beginning July 1, 1988, the MTS operators implemented a policy to allow
passengers to pay transfer upgrade fares on the first R! second vehicle.
(Previous policy required upgrade payment on the second vehicle only.) The
new policy meant that operators previously receiving upgrade fares may no
longer receive them. and those not previously receiving upgrades may now
collect the revenue. Due to this. area operators conducted a transfer survey
in 1987 to estimate which operators would be negatively and positively
impacted by the new policy. Based on the results of the 1987 survey, four
positively impacted operators (San Diego Transit. Chu1a Vista Transit.
National C1ty Transit. and County Transit System) agreed to allocate revenue
to San Diego Trolley (the only negatively impacted operator). Set monthly
revenue amounts were deducted from each operator's monthly pass revenue/
TransNet subsidy check and the sum of the deductions were added to Trolley's
monthly check. The formulation, based on the 1987 survey, continued until
June 30. 1994.
SANOAG. in cooperation with the area operators, conducted a 1994 transfer
survey. Based on this work and additional information from the operators. a
change in the allocation procedures will be put into effect. As of July 1.
1994, the four operators of local bus services (Chu1a Vista Transit. National
City Transit. County Transit System, and MTDB Contract Services for
Routes 933/934 only) will allocate revenue to San Diego Trolley to compensate
for transfer upgrade payments based on an actual monthly accounting of
transfer upgrade revenue received on their services. The operators listed
will report actual amount of transfer upgrade activity on page 1. line 9. of
Attachment I. Monthly revenue amounts. to be calculated by SANOAG. will be
deducted from each operator's monthly pass revenue/TransNet subsidy check and
the sum of the deductions will be added to Trolley's monthly check.
JSW:jsw:paw/lst
UFS-ATTI.JSW
9/29/95
-2-
/y~~~
ATTACHMENT J
ADULT PASS
REVENUE ALLOCATION FORMULA
PROCEDURE DESCRIPTION
The base pass price of $49 is retained from all $49 and $54 passes sold. The
$59, $62, $72 passes are not part of the formula except that 3 percent of the
total revenue from the $59, $62, and $72 passes is retained for the region and
combined with the $49 base revenue. (The 3 percent represents the transfer
rate on the County Transit System Express routes that accept the $59, $62, and
$72 passes. County Transit System Express keeps all the remaining $59, S62,
and $72 pass revenue.) The base pass revenue is then allocated to each
operator that accepts S49 and S54 passes based on the revenue the operator's
percentage of regional pass boardings for all adult passes. Then, revenue for
each S5 pass price increment from the $54 pass is allocated proportionally to
those operators accepting that particular value or a higher value (up to $54)
pass.
PASS REVENUE ALLOCATION PROCEDURE
SteD 1
la. The total number of $49 and S54 Adult passes sold * $49 + 3 percent of
$59, S62, and t12 Adult pass revenue. $49 pass bas~ revenue.
lb. The total number of $49 and $54 pass riders on all routes operated by
operator .x. / the total number of $49 and $54 pass riders on all routes
operated by all operators · proportion of $49 pass base revenue
allocated to operator .x.-
Ie. la * Ib · $49 base pass revenue allocated to operator .x..
SteD 2
2a. The total number of $54 passes sold * 5 - $54 pass incremental revenue.
2b. The total number of $54 pass riders on all routes requiring $54 passes
operated by operator .x. / the total number of $54 pass riders on all
routes requiring $54 passes operated by all operators. proportion of
$54 pass incremental revenue allocated to operator .x..
2c. 2a * 2b · $54 incremental revenue allocated to operator .x..
SteD 3
3a. The total $59, $62, and $72 pass revenue (minus the 3 percent included
in the $49 pass base) is allocated to those County Transit System
Express services that accept $59, S62, and S72 passes.
JSW:jsw:paw/UFS-ATTJ.JSW - 8/l5/9~
/ '1~f~
ArrACHMEHT K
SEHIORIDISABLm AND YOUTH
PASS REVENUE ALLOCATION FORMULA
The totll number of PISS riders (by cltegOr,y) on 111 routes operlted by
operltor .x,. divided by the totll number of PISS riders (by cltego~) on 111
routes operlted by 111 operators equals the Proportion of PISS revenue (by
cltegoryJ Illoclted to operator .x.. .
NIF: 1_
UNI FORMK. HBF
4/26/13
/t/-f'l
ATTACHMENT L
TEN-PACK TICKET
REVENUE ALLOCATION FORMULA
1. Ten-Pack ticket revenue allocation is to be calculated separately for
the following ticket types:
$1.50 10-Pack tickets; and
$1.75 10-Pack tickets..
2. All revenue from ticket sales is allocated each month, regardless of the
relationship between ticket sales and use.
3. Each operator's monthly ticket boardings for a particular month are
calculated by averaging the current month's and past two months'
boarding counts. (Thus, the ticket boarding counts are a revolving
average.) SANDAG will calculate the average monthly boarding counts.
4. Each operator's monthly percent share of ticket revenue is determined as
foll ows:
o Average monthly ticket boardings for operator .x. + total average
monthly ticket boardings for all operators combined.
5. Ticket revenue allocated to each operator is determined as follows:
o Percent share of monthly ticket revenue (from Step 3) for
operator .x. multiplied by the total ticket sales revenue for that
month.
JSW:jsw: 1 st
UFSA-L.JSW
9/29/95
.
$2.50 and $3.00 10-Pack ticket revenue (m~~us three percent retained
~or the region) is allocated to San Diego Counby Transit System Express
services that accept the $2.50 and $3.00 IO-Pa~k tickets.
li'5r
ATTACHMENT H
TOKEN
REVENUE ALLOCATION
1. Tokens are only accepted by San Diego Transit Corporation (SOrC) and
HTOB Contract Routes. Revenue allocation shall be between these two
operators only.
2. Token revenue allocation is to be calculated separately for the
following token types: $1.50 and $1.75.
3. SOTC and HTOB Contract Routes monthly token boardings will be calculated
by the actual token use at $1.40 for $1.50 tokens and $1.70 for $1.75
tokens.
4. Any remaining funds will be allocated to The Transit Store and/or Pass
Administration.
JSW:jsw:1st
USFA-M.JSW
9/29/95
1'I,,5i
ATTACHMENT N
TRANSNET PASS SUBSIDY ALLOCATION PROCEDURE
OBJECTIVE
To allocate TransNet pass subsidies in a manner that ensures each operator
receives pass revenue (sales and subsidies) in an amount equal to pass sales
revenue received prior to TransNet.
STEPS
1. Determine individual operator percent of countywide boardings (from
operator counts).
2. Allocate pass sales revenue based on Step 1.
3. Total MTDB area operator percent share to determine MTDB area share of
countywide boardings (NCTD share · remaining).
4. Determine pass sales attributable to MTDB/NCTD boardings.
(MTDB S x number of countywide passes sold;
HCTD S x number of countywide passes sold)
5. Multip11 MTDB passes sold x $12.25 (Senior/Disabled)' or $24.50
(Youth) subsidy/pass. MTDB area TransNet subsidy pool.
(HCTD TransNet subSidy pool · NCTD passes x $ determined by NCTD.)
6. Recalculate individual operator percent share of boardings for MTDB area
only.
7. Apply operator shares to MTDB TransNet subSidy pool. individual
operator TransNet subsidy.
8. Steps 2 + 6 - total operator pass revenue.
JSW:jsw:paw
UFSA-N.J5W.
9/29/95
'Base price for senior/disabled is 50 percent of $49 pass. Therefore,
TransNet subSidy/pass is: $24.50 - S12.25 pass revenue. S12.25 subSidy/pass.
2B~se price fo~ youth is 100 percent of S49 pass. Therefore, TransHet
subSidy/pass .~s.: $49.00 - S24.00 pass revenue - $24.5Cl subSidy/pass.
.., I'I'~P
'-
COASTER Plus Monthly Passes
Regular
Youth
Senior/Disabled
ATTACHMENT 0
COAST EXPRESS RAIL
FARE STRUCTURE
S80, S85, S90, S95
S47
S23.00
Youth and Senior/Disabled COASTER Plus passes are good in all zones.
Reaular Fares
No. of
Zones
1
2
3
4
Single
TriD
S2.50
S2.75
S3.00
S3.25
Senior/Disabled Fares
No. of
Zones
1
2
3
4
JSW:paw
UFS-ATTO.JSW
8/15/95
Single
TriD
S1. 25
SI.35
S1.50
$1.60
Round Ten Monthly
TriD TriD Pass
S4.75 S22.50 S80.00
S5.25 S24.75 S85.00
S5.70 S27.00 S90.00
S6.20 S29.95 S95.00
Round Ten Monthly
TriD TriD Pass
S2.35 Sl1.25 N/A
S2.60 $12.35 N/A
S2.85 S13.50 N/A
S3.10 $14.60 S13.00
I {-- , I
ATTACHMENT P
Coast
Express
Rail
Zones
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
., , , , , , , , , , "
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '
, '2' 'me' , , t~1 ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, 0 II ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '"' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,., , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, '1m;' , ,~ , ~t' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, OlDI a""""""""""""""""""
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , "Z. 0Ng" '2"'" , , , , , , , , , ,
. . """""", , """""",.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . , """""""
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , ~
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
~ , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , " , " " , " , , , , , , , " , , , , " , , " , , , , , , , , , , " " , , , , , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ , , , , , , , ,
, , , " , " " , , " , , , , , " " " , , , , " , , , , , , " , , , , , , , , , " , " , , , , , , , , "
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , " , " , , , " , " , , , , , , , , , " , , " , " " " , , , , " , , , " " , " " , " " "
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , " , , " , , " , , , , , , , " , , , " ~ , , , " " , , , , , " " " " " , " ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~
' , " , , , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , " , , , , , , , , " , , , , , " , , , " , " , " , " " , , ,
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
. , , " , , J' , " , , , ~' " , , ~' , " " , , " , , " " " , , , " , , , , " , " , " " , ,
' '$~ 'Rtl~" " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
, , """"""""""""""""
, " """"""""""""""
, ,,', " " , , " , " " , , , " , , , , " , , , , " " , , , , ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
''''''''""""""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',',','- ',',',',',',',,',,',',',',',',,',',',',',~,'~~,',',
' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,-, , , , , -
~ , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , " , , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " , " , , " " , " "
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
. ""'" , , , , , , , , , " , , " , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , " " , " , " " ,
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
"""'''''',,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , '.
....,~.........~......,........I...........,.......... .,. '....'S. ......................fitl. . anfJ'" . ..................................'
'....,..........'....................................... ......' tt' . .~. . .~. '. .. ')f:' .............................
.......................................................... ':'. G .... ............................
....'.................................................'.' ...... . . .... . . ..............................
......'.......................... .. . .. ...............
. , . , .',.............................................. . ................................'..... ..............................
.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :.:.:. :'. .::.:.:.:.:.:. :.:. :.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :':'.':':' :.: .:. :.:.: .:.:.:.:. :.:.:.
:::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ::::::" ,:,,':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ::::: :::::: :::::::::::
. .'. . , ' , '.' . . , '. '. '. .... '. '. '. '.' .... .' .... .'. . . '. ...... '. .....; '.' .' '. .... '. '. '. . . .... ..... ................. .... .......................
. . . . " ' , . , . . . , '. . . . . .... '.' . '. '. . .'. I .' .'. . . . . .... ........ ............ '. . . '. ........ ..... .'. '. '. ............... I.... .... I................
:::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: ::::::: ::::: :::::: ::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ~: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : :: ':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: : : : : : : : : : : : : :-: : : : : :
:':':.:':::::::::::::: ::: :::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::: ::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :::: :::::: :::::.::::: ::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:..,....... ,.......... .,...... ........-............,.... I,' .'......... I. .....,.....t. I............ I... I.' I'... I......... .................
. : : : : : : : : . : : : . : . : . : . :~". : .~. :. : . : . :. : . : . :.: . :. :. :. : .: . : . : : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : . : .: . : . : . : . : . :.: .:. :. :.: .:. : .:. :.:.:.:
. . . . ,'. .......... ~ ',' ........................ .". ....................................................'.............
. :::::::: ::::::::::::" .', '. .'. ,,::. ,::: :::: ::::::::::: :::::::::: . '::: ::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
.,...... '.' .'. '.'. '. ..'........ .'... ',' ........ .'.'. ...... ,.,..:. ............. '............,. ....... ...................................
: :: : :: : : :::: :: :: :: :::::::::::: :: :: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::. . . '::::::::::::}:::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;
',.,.,..1.'. I....... '.', ...... .... .... .... I. I, I. .... ....... . .... I. .... I. ..... .......... .'... .... .... .................................. j
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ':::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::: :::: i
::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: ill:::::::::: ::: ::::: :::::::::::::::'
:::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::: :::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ::: ::::: ::::::: ::::::: :::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::: :::::::::: :::::::: ::::::: :::::::
....',.........1 I. ......., ..... ,'. I. I. 'I ....... .', ......' .'. I, ...:........ I,., I, ',.,......., ...... ............................'.........
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::, '::: I:: :.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::: :::: ::: ::::::::::: ::::
:: :: : : :::::::: : :::: ::::::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::: '::::::::::::::::::: ::::;:::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::. ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
....',........ '............ .'....,.............. I,.......... ........,.........t.........,.. 1............,...,.. I, .... ......'....,.... I.
::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::: :::::::::: :::::::::::: ::: ::::: '::::::: ::::::::::: ::::::: ~::::: ::::::: ::::::: ::::: ::: ::: ::::::::: ::::::::
'. '. . , . . . . '. . , '. . , . ,',' . '.' .' . . , . .'. . . . . . . '. '. '. .... '. '. .... . , . '. . , '.' .' .'. . .' , . . '.' .'. '. '. '. '. .... '. .... . . . I '. ................ '. ......
. . . . . . . . - - - . . . . . . . . . & -.- . . . . . . . . . . .
..................................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
..................................
.................................
.. . . . . ... .. . . ... . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . .
. . .Old. +A\\!ti- ... ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . ·
.. ... .................
.... ...................
. . . .. 6 6" . . . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . .. ..
. . ... .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . . .
. . .. . . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . ... .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .
...............................
................................
..................................
.................................
. . . . . .. . . . .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. .. . . .
. ..san:......tife.i:..................
. . 0" . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . ............
. .. .. .. .. .... .. . . ..it). ..........................
. . . .. . . .. . .. ....................
. .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. .. .. .
.. .. .. ... .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ..
. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .'. .. . . .. . .. . . . .
.. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . .. .. .. .. . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . . ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . .
.. . .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. . . . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . ..
.. .. .. . . . . . .. .. . . . .. .. .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. .. . .. .. . .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . .. . . .. . . .. . . . . .. . .. . .
. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. .. . . . ..
. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. . .. . .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. .
...................-................
. .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . .~.. . . .. . .. . . . . . . ..
............. . ...............
.. .. . . .. . .. . . . . . . .. ..~- .. . .. . . . . . . .. .
................ ..~..................
- . . .. .. . . . .. . .. .. . .. .. . . . . .. . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . .. . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. . .. . .. .. .. . . . .. . . . . . . . .. .. .
... .. . .. . . .. .. .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . .. .. . . . . . .. . . . .. . . . . ..
. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. . . .. . .. . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . .. . .. .. .. .. .
- .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. ..
. . .. . .. . .. .. . .. . . . . .. .. . .. . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. .
. . .. . .. .. . . .. . . .. . .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. . . .
...........................................
. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. . . . . . . .... . - . .. .. . . . . .. .. .. . .. . . . . .. .
.. .. . - . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. . . . .. .. . .. .. . .. . . .
/~-~ ,2.
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Public Hearing: PCM-96-07; Consideration of amendments to the
EastLake II General Development Plan (EastLake I Extension), EastLake
Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan, Planned Community District
Regulations, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation Plan
and Public Facilities Financing Plan.
Resolution 18'l5fApproving the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion)
General Development Plan, EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake
Greens Water Conservation Plan and Eastlake Greens Public Facilities
Financing Plan.
Ordinance :/t.5lf;..pproving Amendments to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations (Land
Use District Map only).
. l
Director of Planning. ~:X~:> .' "
C- ,
City ManageJl ~ "-- .
U /?
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-XJ
The EastLake Development Company has requested amendments to the EastLake II General
Development Plan (EastLake I Expansion), EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA)
Plan, Planned Community District Regulations, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water
Conservation Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan. The purpose of these amendments is
to:
· Relocate two neighborhood park parcels,
Expand the area available for community purpose facilities (PQ)
· Transfer Densities among parcels within the SPA
· Adjust land use and parcel boundaries
· Designate parcel R-26 for low income housing in accordance with the recently adopted
EastLake Affordable Housing Program and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing
Agreement.
The documents affected by the amendments, as proposed to be revised, have been provided for
your consideration and approval (see Sections 4-8).
IM-/
Page 2, Item I~,L}
Meeting Date 12/12/95
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new or supplemental EIR is
necessary and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake Greens, which must
be considered by the City Council prior to a decision on the project (see Attachment 4).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
On November 29, 1995, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that the City
Council approve the proposed amendments to the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan and EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan in accordance
with resolution PCM-96-07.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council adopt the attached resolution and ordinance approving the proposal based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
DISCUSSION:
The EastLake Greens Planned Community is located on the south side of Otay Lakes Road
between Hunte Parkway and the future alignment of the SR-125 Freeway (see Locator/
Exhibit A).
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments consist of relocating two neighborhood parks
(parcels P-3 & P-5), transferring densities among parcels within the SPA, expanding the
acreage available for community purpose facilities (PQ) and designating Parcel R-26 for low
income housing in accordance with the recently adopted EastLake Affordable Housing Program
and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement (see Section 5 Appendix A).
The General Plan Designations for the parcels involved are Residential Low Medium Density
(3-6 du/ac) and Residential Medium High Density (11-18 du/ac). The Greens, however, is
planned to be developed at about 4.5 du/ac. The non-residential parcels are designated Parks
and Recreation (P) and Public & Quasi-Public (PQ).
The existing EastLake Greens GDP and SPA are not consistent with the Housing Element of
the General Plan. However, the proposed amendments would bring these documents into
conformance.
The following paragraphs discuss each of the proposed amendments in more detail:
154".,2
Page 3, Item /..5 /J
Meeting Date 12/12/95
General Development Plan Amendment (Section 4)
The General Development Plan text, map and statistical tables are proposed to be amended to
reflect the proposed land use designation boundary adjustments and the following land use
designation modifications which represent the requested density transfers and park relocations:
Parcel
Change From
To
R-IO
R-12
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
M (medium 6-11 du/ac)
LM & P (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac
and Park and Recreation)
R-18
R-20
R-21
R-23
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
No change
DELETED
LM & P (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac and
Park & Rec)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
(Removes Interim Designation)
PQ (Public Quasi-Public)
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
R-26
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
(Interim Designation)
P (Parks and Rec)
P (Parks and Rec)
P-3
P-5
The proposed changes, which include a reduction in the total number of dwelling units from
6660 to 6527 (-133), are illustrated in the proposed GDP Plan (see Exhibits B-1 & B-2).
EastLake Greens Sectional Plannin2: Area (SPA) Plan Amendment (Section 5)
The SPA amendment includes the relocation of two neighborhood parks, density transfers, land
use boundaries adjustment, expansion of the community purpose facilities land use designation
(PQ), minor refinements to the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), and designating parcel
R-26 for low income housing.
Neighborhood Parks Relocation
The neighborhood park identified as P-3 in the site utilization plan is presently shown
on the east side of EastLake Parkway, partially within the southerly utility easement
(see Exhibit C). The park site contains 11 acres, but 4.7 acres are within the SDG&E
easement located along the south end of the parcel. Thus, the net usable park land is
about 6.3 acres. The park is proposed to be moved to the 10 acre site presently
identified as R-21. This parcel, which is targeted for 120 units, would be deleted and
the acreage transferred to the public quasi-public parcel PQ-2 (see Exhibit D). Although
the gross acreage of the new park location is smaller, the net usable park land acreage
provided for the EastLake Greens increases by approximately 3.7 acres.
Jf~'J
Page 4, Item /.f:tJ
Meeting Date 12/12/95
The three acre private neighborhood park identified as parcel P-5 (see Exhibit C) is also
proposed to be relocated to the southwest corner of South Greens View Drive and
Hunte Parkway (see Exhibit D). The park acreage remains the same but the new
location provides better exposure and linkage to the open space lot and trails located
directly across South Greens View Drive.
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3 and P-5) respond to final master plan
refinements intended to improve the Planned Community's recreational facilities and
add to the quality of living at EastLake.
Density Transfers
The density transfers and parcel boundary adjustments are market based changes and
planned community plan refinements intended to improve the quality of the
neighborhoods. These changes will result in a reduction of 133 dwelling units without
significant change to the original EastLake Greens Planned Community design.
For the purpose of this report, the density transfers can be categorized as minor and
major. Minor density transfers are those that involve an increase or reduction of 12 or
less units and do not include changes in the GDP Land Use Plan designations or in the
residential type. The following list reflects the proposed minor density transfers:
Parcel R-3 -10
Parcel R-4 +10
Parcel R-6 -12
Parcel R-12 -1
Parcel R -15 -1
Parcel R-22 -2
Parcel R-24 +2
Parcel R-27 -4
Parcel R-28 -9
The acreage and target densities have changed slightly on these parcels but the unit type
and GDP land use designation remain unchanged (see Exhibit C).
Major density transfers, which are those involving more than 12 units and which require
changes in the GDP and Land Use District Designations, are as follows:
If/? ' '/
Page 5, Item / .5:t)
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Parcel 16: The acreage on this parcel increased from 10.5 to 10.9 (+ 0.4 ac) and the
number of units increased from 83 to 109 (+26 units). The target density has also
changed from 7.9 to 10 dulac which is consistent with the existing GDP designation of
Residential Medium Density.
Parcel 18: On this parcel the acreage does not change, but the number of units is
reduced from 87 to 54 (-33 units). Consequently, the density is reduced from 8.8 to 5.5
and the GDP designation change from Medium Density (6-11 dulac) to Low Medium
Density (3-6 dulac).
Parcel 20: For this parcel, the acreage is reduced from 15.7 to 14.3 (-1.4 acres) and
the number of units reduced from 146 to 109 (-37 units). The overall result is a
reduction in density from 9.0 to 7.6 dulac. which is consistent with the existing GDP
designation of Medium Density (6-11 dulac)
Parcel 21: This parcel is deleted and the acreage transferred to parcel PQ-2 (-10 ac
& -120 units).
Parcel 23: The acreage on this parcel is increased from 15.8 to 20.3 (+4.5 ac), but
the dwelling units have been reduced from 214 to 72 (-142 units). The reduction in
units results in a decrease in density from 13.3 to 3.5 dulac, a change in land use
designation from Medium High Density (11-18 dulac) to Low Medium Density (3-6
dulac), and change in residential unit type from Residential Condominium to Residential
Estates.
Parcel 26: The acreage on this parcel is increased from 13.3 to 17 acres (+3.7 ac)
and the number of units from 60 to 260. The density increases from 4.5 to 19.5 dulac
(+ 15 dulac) which changes the GDP land use designation from Interim Low Medium
Density (3-6 dulac) to Medium High Density (11-18 dulac). The increase in density
would allow EastLake to implement the recently adopted EastLake Greens Affordable
Housing Program.
The proposed density transfers result in an overall reduction of density (133 dwelling
units) without a significant change in the original master plan design. The site
utilization plan is proposed to be amended to reflect the proposed General Development
Plan and SPA Plan changes (see Exhibit D).
Boundary Adjustments
As a result of the relocation of the park sites and the density transfers, the configuration
of Parcel 10 has been modified, and the acreage reduced from 45.4 to 34.6 acres (-10.8
acres). The number of units, however, remains the same (246). The overall result is an
15',,1''>
Page 6, Item /..519
Meeting Date 12/12/95
increase in density from 5.4 to 7.1 du/ac which changes the GDP land use designation
from Low Medium Density (3-6 du/ac) to Medium Density (6-11 du/ac) (see Exhibits
B-1 and B-2).
The reconfiguration of Parcel 10 and other parcels discussed in the Density Transfer
Section of this report do not change the original development pattern and circulation
system of the EastLake Master Plan. These boundary adjustments would be
incorporated in the EastLake Greens Master Tentative Map through a separate lot line
adjustment process.
Expansion of the Community Purpose Facilities (PQ) land use designation
Section 19.48.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code requires that all planned
community (PC) districts designate land for community purpose facilities at a rate of
1.39 acres per 1,000 population. The current EastLake Greens SPA plan, with 2,871
dwelling units, provides a total of 17.1 acres in two separate parcels (PQ-1 and PQ-2),
or about 2 acres per 1,000 population (see Exhibit C).
The proposed amendments reduce the acreage on Parcel PQ-l from 12.3 to 10.3 (-2
acres), increase the acreage on Parcel PQ-2 from 4.8 to 15.8 (+ 11 acres) and reduce
the total number of dwelling units from 2871 to 2738 (-133). With the reduction of
133 dwelling units and the added acreage, the ratio would be inc.reased to 3.2 acres/
1,000 population.
Although the gross acreage provided for community purpose facilities exceeds the
Chula Vista Municipal Code requirement, a total of 15 acres are either used for other
purposes or have limited use. Parcel PQ-l (10.3 ac.) is presently occupied by an
existing water storage tank and 4.7 acres of the expanded Parcel PQ-2 are within a
utility easement. Thus, the net usable acreage is about 11.1 acres which represents about
1.37 acres per 1,000 population. This ratio is more in keeping with the CVMC
requirement. It is important to note, however, that the area within the utility easement
could be used for outdoor type uses in conjunction with a community facility and that
the excess acreage could potentially be used when the EastLake's southerly adjacent
land is master planned.
Designation of Parcel R-26 for Low Income Housing
The EastLake I General Development Plan (EastLake I extension) designates parcel
R-26 Residential Low Medium Density (3-6 du/ac). However, in December 1993, the
City Council approved an amendment to the General Plan to increase the density of
parcels R-9 and R-26, and reinstated a previously deferred requirement to provide 10%
of the approved housing units as affordable to low and moderate income households.
/5/J ' ~
Page 7, Item If/!
Meeting Date 12/12/95
To comply with this requirement the City Council approved, in July of this year, an
Affordable Housing Program for the EastLake Greens as well as the remaining
undeveloped portions of EastLake.
The Affordable Housing Program implementation strategies identify parcel R-26 as the
first low income housing site within the Greens, and it is expected that this site would
provide the bulk of the Greens low income housing commitment. To enable this to
occur, and consistent with the General Plan for this site, the land use designation is
proposed to be changed from Low Medium Density (3-6 du/ac) to Medium High
Density (11-18 du/ac), and the allowed number of units increased from 60 to 260. The
above mentioned Affordable Housing Program is being incorporated as part of the
EastLake Greens SPA (Section 5 appendix A)
EastLake Greens Planned Community District Regulations Amendment (Section 6)
The Land Use District Map in the Planned Community District Regulation document is
proposed to be amended to reflect the above mentioned density transfers, land use boundary
adjustments and park relocations. More specifically the Land Use District Plan amendments
are as follows:
Parcel 21
From RC-15, Residential Condominium to
RS-5, Residential Estates
Parcel 23
From PC-15, Residential Condominium to
OS-4, Open Space
Parcel P-3
From OS-4, Open Space to
VC-3, Village Center
Parcel P-5
From OS-4, Open Space to
RP-8, Residential Planned Concept & OS-4, Open Space
The existing and proposed land use district designations are illustrated on Exhibit F and G.
EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan. Air Quality Improvement Plan. and Public
Facilities Financine: Plan (Section 7)
As a result of the proposed amendments, minor statistical amendments to the EastLake Greens
Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan
are being proposed to reflect updated project data.
The Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), however, III addition to mmor statistical
amendments and project phasing changes, includes new language reinstating EastLake's
previous agreement to construct a previously deferred community center and bond $700,000
/>~ - 1
Page 8, Item /9
Meeting Date 12/12/95
for that facility (see Specific language in Section 8). The background rationale and justification
for the amended PFFP Parks language is addressed in a separate attached report from Parks and
Recreation.
ANALYSIS
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments incorporate the recently adopted Affordable Housing
Program and identify a parcel to implement the previously deferred requirement to provide
10% of the total units contained within the SPA as affordable to low and moderate income
households. The amendment also brings the GDP and SPA into compliance with the Housing
Element of the Chula Vista General Plan.
The expansion of the Public/Quasi-Public land use designation would reinstate the community
purpose facilities (PQ) acreage taken by the existing water tank and allow the establishment
of more traditional community services, such as churches, day care centers, assembly halls, etc.
in the remaining PQ acreage.
The proposed density transfers, which will result in a reduction of 133 units, will also allow
the developer to respond to present housing market demands and provide land use changes that
complement the existing planned community recreational facilities and quality of life at
EastLake.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons noted above, staff recommends approval of the project in accordance with the
attached Planning Commission resolution.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The applicant has paid for all costs associated with the processing of
these amendments.
Attachments
1. Council Resolutions and Ordinances
2. Exhibits:
3. Planning Commission Minutes and Resolutions
4. FSEIR-86-04 (B) Addendum
5. Disclosure Statement
6, EastLake Park Issues Report
(M:\HOMEIPLANNINGILUISIPCM-9607.113
15'/1" 8"
ORDINANCE NO.
~U'r
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
(LAND USE DISTRICT MAP ONL Y) AND CONSIDERING AN ADDENDUM
TO FSEIR-86-04 (B).
1. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which are the subject matter of this ordinance are
diagrammatically represented on Exhibit E and F attached hereto and incorporated
by this reference, and located within the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion)
Planned Community Area of the City of Chula Vista ("Project Site"); and
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29,1995, the EastLake Development Company
("Developer") filed an application requesting amendments to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations (known as
Document No. _ on file with the office of the City Clerk) Land Use District
Map and Land Use District designations of certain areas within the EastLake
Greens Planned Community ("Project").
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the Project Site has been in part the subject matter of a Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No.
15199 ("EastLake Greens SPA Plan") and Planned Community (P.c.) District
Regulations previously approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2317
(EastLake II-EastLake I Expansion-Planned Community District Regulations) on
July 18,1989.
D. Planning Commission Record on Applications
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on November 29, 1995, and voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the Planned Community District Regulation Land Use District Plan
amendment in accordance with the findings listed below.
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at
their public hearing on this Project held on November 29, 1995, and the minutes
and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of
this proceeding.
If~' ?
E. City Council Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 12, 1995, on the Discretionary
Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning
Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and,
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this ordinance was
introduced for first reading (December 12, 1995), the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista approved Resolution No. by which it imposed
amendments on the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development
Plan, EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area SPA Plan, EastLake Greens Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan, and
EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan.
II NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain
as follows:
A. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new supplemental
EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake
Greens, which must be considered by the City Council prior to a decision on the
project.
B. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review
and judgement, the addendum to EIR 86-04 in the form presented has been
prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality
Act, the state EIR guidelines and the Environmental Review procedures of the
City of Chula Vista and does hereby adopt same.
C. FINDINGS FOR P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE AMENDMENTS
The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations Land Use
Districts Plan are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public
necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice support the
amendments.
/~,/~
D. APPROV AL OF ZONE AMENDMENTS
The City Council does hereby approve the Planned Community District
Regulation amendment to the Land Use District Map as diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit F.
III. INVALIDITY; A UTOMA TIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Ordinance is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined
by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this
resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
IV. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after
its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/>
/
/ - .,~
L-...-- '--
.------------
Z 1 ~::c<-c->c~-?
/- .. "
Bruce M. Boogaard / - \
City Attomey. \ -J
Robert A. Lei ter
Director of Planning
M: Isharedlplanninglpcm9fi.(17 _cco
/S/j '/1
RESOLUTION
/8'l.59
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA), PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WATER
CONSERV A TION PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN.
I.
RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which the subject matter of this resolution are
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit B-1 and B-2 attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, identified as the EastLake General
Development Plan and EastLake Greens SPA Plan Area, ("Project Site");
and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29, 1995, the EastLake Development Company
("Developer") filed applications for an amendment to: 1) the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan (known as Document
No. C094-183, on file with the office of the City Clerk), 2) the EastLake
Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan (known as Document No. C094-
184, on file in the office of the City Clerk), 3) the EastLake Greens Air
Quality Improvement Plan (known as Document No. C094-185, on file
with the office of the City Clerk), 4) the EastLake Greens Water
Conservation Plan (known as Document No. C094-l86, on file with the
office of the City Clerk), and 5) The EastLake Greens Public Facilities
Financing Plan on file in the office of the City Clerk) ("Project"); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject
matter of I) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan,
previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199; (SPA), all
approved on July 18, 1989; and, 3) an Air Quality Improvement Plan
(East Lake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan) and 4) a Water
Conservation Plan (EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan) and Public
Facilities Financing Plan (Eastlake Greens Public Facilities Financing
Plan), all previously approved by the City Council on November 24,
1992, by Resolution No. 16898; and
15/1, IY
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing
on said project on November 29, 1995, and voted to recommend that the
City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings listed below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 12, 1995, on the
Discretionary Approval Applications, received the recommendations of the
Planning Commission, and heard public testimony with regard to same;
and,
F. WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting, at which this Resolution
was approved December 12, 1995, the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista approved for first reading Ordinance No. amending the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District
Regulations Land Use District Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find, determine and resolve as follows:
II.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at
their public hearing on this project held on November 29, 1995, and the minutes
and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of
this proceeding.
III.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new supplemental
EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum the FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake
Greens, which must be considered by the City Council prior to a decision on this
project.
IV.
INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that in the exercise of their independent review
and judgment, the addendum to EIR-86-04 in the form presented has been
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures
of the City of Chula Vista and does hereby adopt the same.
V.
GDP FINDINGS
/5:9,I(
A. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED BY THE
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake II (East Lake I Expansion) General Development
Plan retlects land LIse distribution and densities, and circulation system
that are consistent with all elements of the Chula Vista General Plan.
B. A PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAN BE INITIATED
BY ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA PLANS WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE.
A SPA Plan has already been approved for the development of the
planned community and amendments thereto conforming to the amended
GDP are included in the Project.
C. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,
THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A RESIDENTIAL
ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY;
AND THAT IT WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH OR PROVIDE
COMPATIBLE VARIETY TO THE CHARACTER OF THE
SURROUNDING AREA, AND THAT THE SITES PROPOSED FOR
PUBLIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS AND
PARKS, ARE ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ANTICIPATED
POPULATION AND APPEAR ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF.
The residential densities and transfers retlected on the amended GDP are
compatible with the pattern and character of development approved with
the original GDP, and can be adequately served by the public facilities
incorporated therein and therefore will constitute a residential environment
of sustained durability and stability; and that it will be in harmony with
or provide compatible variety to the character of the surrounding area, and
that the sites proposed for public facilities, such as schools, playgrounds
ancl parks, are adequate to serve the anticipated population and appear
acceptable to the public authorities having jurisdiction thereof.
D. ADOPTION OF AMENDED GDP.
In light of the findings above, the amended EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) General Development Plan is hereby approved and adopted in
the form presented and attached hereto as Exhibit A.
VI.
SPA FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN
/S/7-/5
CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I
EXPANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA
VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan reflects land
use, circulation system, and public facilities that are consistent with the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan and the
Chula Vista General Plan.
B. THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN,
AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA.
The SPA Plan as amended is consistent with the amended phasing of
internal and external infrastructure and consistent with the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Public Facilities Financing Plan, Air Quality
I mprovement Plan, and Water Conservation Plan and will therefore,
promote the orderly sequentialized development of the involved Sectional
Planning Area.
C. THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
PLAN AS AMENDED WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT
LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The land uses within the EastLake Greens SPA area represent the same
uses approved by the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan and will not adversely affect adjacent land use,
residential enjoyment, circulation, or environmental quality.
D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES,
THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA,
LOCATION, AND OVER-ALL DESIGN FOR THE PURPOSE
INTENDED; THAT THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY
AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The amendments do not involve areas planned for industrial or research
uses.
E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL , RECREATIONAL, AND
OTHER SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION
AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND
THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM ANY
/.5/1- /~
ADVERSE EFFECTS FORM SUCH DEVELOPMENT.
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3 and P-5) respond to final
master plan refinements intended to improve the Planned Community's
recreational facilities and add to the quality of living at EastLake and
therefore, development will be appropriate in area, location and over-aU
planning to the purpose proposed and that surrounding areas are protected
from any adverse effects from such development.
F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE
AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC
THEREON.
The amendments do not involve changes to the existing circulation system.
G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
JUSTIFIED ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED
AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF
THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCA TION(S).
The amendments clo not involve areas planned for commercial uses.
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL
COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT.
The amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and
regulations applicable to surrounding areas and therefore, said
development can be planned and zoned in coordination and substantial
compatibility with said development.
I. ADOPTION OF SPA
In light of the findings above, the amended EastLake Greens Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) plan is hereby approved and adopted in the form
presented and attached as Exhibit A.
VII.
INV ALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term provision and
conditions herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms,
provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
/5~ -I?
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
M: Ihomelplanning\luislJ>C 'M.96(17 .eel"
Approved as to form by
//
'----
Bruce M.- Boogaard
City Attorney
15/1,,/r
c::~-
._..-C~i-"5>,?~y.:.-..---.-
/' i
I
j
-~--
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /.5g
Meeting Date 12/12/95
SUBMITTED BY:
Report: EastLake Park Issues ,
I
::;::n:::;; ;~r'l
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No _XJ
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
This report addresses an unresolved park issue associated with the processing of amendments to the
EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan (as identified in the GDP/SP A Plan Amendment).
The main focus of this report is to ensure that the community center identified in the EastLake Park
Agreement is financed and constructed by the EastLake Development Company.
Over the past year, staff has been negotiating with EastLake to settle their remaining park obligation
for the community park in EastLake Greens. The obligation entails the construction of a community
center at Chula Vista Community Park. The obligation was negotiated as a result of the loss of
public parkland in EastLake I (Hills and Shores) and the privatization of said land. Although the
community center will not be constructed in the near future, staff wants to ensure that his obligation
is not forgotten. At the core of our discussions has been whether Eastlake met its park and
recreation obligations in EastLake I and EastLake Greens. Although EastLake has constructed and
met its community park obligation (Chula Vista Community Park), they haven't met their facility
obligation. Described below are the viewpoints of both parties.
City Staff Position: EastLake Development Company is required to build a community center at
Chula Vista Community Park at some future date in accordance with the Eastlake Park Agreement
(See Section 3.2 [B] Developer's Commitment and EastLake Park Master Plan - Attachment "A".)
EastLake Development Company's Position: EastLake believes they have fulfilled or exceeded their
$2.6 million dollar park obligation through the provision of a community park in EastLake Greens.
Further, EastLake believes the obligation to build a community center is a city-wide obligation that
should be shared with the other developers in the City. EastLake has proposed some alternative
language to the Public Facilities Financing Plan (see attachment "B").
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the General Development Plan and SPA Plan
Amendment, and the amended language in the Public Facilities Financing Plan as presented by staff.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None
[M:\HOME\P ARKSREC\Al13\ELPRARKA13]
1
I~ LJ-I
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
DISCUSSION:
Park Historv in EastLake
To understand the park issues associated with the processing of these documents, it is important to explain
the historical sequence of events and past actions the Council has taken in EastLake I (Hills and Shores),
the EastLake Park Agreement, the EastLake II (Greens) Development Agreement and the EastLake III
(Trails, Woods and Vistas) Development Agreement. All three Agreements compliment one another with
respect to parkland and recreation facility allocation, financing and construction.
In 1985, the City Council approved the General Development Plan and Specific Plan for EastLake Hills
and Shores neighborhoods, which included approximately 2,384 dwelling units and various parks and
open space facilities. Some of the facilities were deemed exclusively private and others opened to the
general public but maintained by the EastLake Homeowners Association. In 1988, EastLake residents
expressed concern to the Council about continued use of these privately maintained park facilities by the
general public.
In December of 1988, staff returned to Council with options on how these public facilities could revert
back to private ownership. At that time, Council adopted the following recommendations: 1) accept the
concept of returning 5 + acres of public park facilities in EastLake Shores to private domain in
exchange for comparable park acreage and upfront development funds to build a community park,
2) prepare a resolution of intention to vacate certain public service easements, 3) process an
amendment to the EastLake I SPA declaring said park facilities as strictly private facilities for
EastLake home owners, and 4) prepare an agreement with EastLake which required them to finance
a community park in one phase in exchange for future park land acquisition and development
credit. Council also directed staff to add the 5 acres of park land that was lost due to privatizing
the common area around the lakes into future developments. On a side note, the five acre obligation
was added to the Eastlake III (Trails, Woods, Vistas) Development Agreement.
Staff informed the Council that the Community Park (Chula Vista Community Park) would include a
community center and gymnasium. Further, under the fiscal impact statement, staff informed the Council
that $1.5 million dollars would pay for the complete development of the community park (based on
current cost estimates [1988 costs]), with a caveat that final credit would be based on actual construction
costs. These cost estimate was later refined to the amount of $2.6 million dollars.
EastLake Park Agreement. In 1989, staff returned back to Council with the EastLake Park Agreement
and a park master plan. The plan called for a 14.7 acre park, containing a community center and
gymnasium.
The Agreement also called out that the City would return to EastLake the $500,000 in cash that was
collected as park development impact fees in EastLake l. These funds were to be placed in an interest
bearing account and have not been returned to EastLake. In addition, EastLake was required to deposit
$500,000 in cash to serve as security for the 5 acres of park land that was lost in EastLake l. The
[M:IHOMEIP ARKSREC\A113\ELPRARKA13j
2
I~~ -~
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
financial obligations identified in this particular Agreement playa significant role in EastLake's proposal
before you tonight. This issue will be discussed in detail further on in this report.
Another item addressed in the staff report dealt with facility size. The gym was initially scheduled to be
3,500 square feet and the Community Center 5,500 square feet. Staff informed Council that the gym was
too small to adequately conduct sports activities. Consequently, the council directed staff to plan a larger
gym. The specifics of the agreement are listed below:
(b) Developer shall construct a 14.7 acre park ("Community Park") adjacent to the proposed
EastLake High School within twenty-four (24) months of the effective date of this
Agreement. Upon completion of the construction of the Community Park and the
expiration of a normal maintenance period for public facilities, Developer shall convey
the Community Park site to the City.
Community Park improvements shall be as described in the Wimmer Yamada &
Associates Master Plan Estimate (see Attachment "C"). It is estimated that the total
improvements will cost $2,605,043. Developer shall be entitled to park credits for its
actual cost in constructing the improvements. Actual costs shall include only the
following:
1) Construction costs including site preparation, grading, soil testing and
compaction costs;
2) Landscaping, architectural and engineering costs;
3) Labor and material costs;
4) Insurance, fees and permit costs
City shall retain the right to approve all construction plans and deny credit for any costs
deemed unreasonable by the City.
This credit shall be applied against Developer's future park acquisition and development
obligations for EastLake Trails portion of EastLake II.
Smaller Park: Subsequent to the 1989 action noted above, two significant turn of events occurred in
1990 while the construction plans were being formulated: 1) The Community Park became smaller, and
2) a recognition that the cost of the park and facilities, were going to exceed the $2.6 million dollar
estimate if the gym was enlarged.
EastLake Development Company reported to the Department that the park's size was reduced to
approximately 12.9 acres. According to EastLake, this reduction was attributed to the alignment of
EastLake Parkway, the engineering of the varsity baseball field at the high school and an unusable slope
condition surrounding a portion of the park. To make up for this reduction, the City Council approved
[M:\HOME\P ARKSREC\A113\ELPRARKA13j
3
/S'..6 -3
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
adding two acres of parkland to the EastLake III Agreement, thereby bringing the total owed for parks
to 7 acres (privatizing the area around the lakes [5 acres] plus the smaller park [2] acres equals 7 acres).
The EastLake III Agreement will be discussed in more detail later on in this report.
Construction Estimate: In the early part of 1990, staff and EastLake began to fine tune the construction
estimate for the Parks and Recreation facilities. It became quite evident that $2.6 mill on dollars estimated
for this project was not going to be sufficient to finance a larger gymnasium. As a result, a decision was
made to build the community center and park in one phase, and construct the gymnasium in a later phase.
In lieu of the gymnasium, a cement slab was envisioned to serve as either an interim volleyball court or
basketball court. The City agreed with Eastlake to add language that called for Park Acquisition and
Development (PAD) Fee advances to finance the gymnasium's construction ($1,522,000) into the
EastLake III Agreement.
As EastLake proceeded with the development of EastLake Greens and EastLake III, two development
agreements were approved by the Council: EastLake II and Eastlake III Development Agreements. In
addition to addressing both development projects, the agreements also contained important park and
recreation facility requirements.
EastLake II and III Agreements. In April 1990, the City Council approved the EastLake II (Greens)
Agreement. The EastLake II Agreement stipulated that EastLake advance funding and construction of
the community park, which included lighted softball and soccer fields, and a community center. The
Council also approved enlarging the size of the gymnasium. The Agreement took into account the
limitation of the $2.6 millon dollar park estimate in the EastLake Park Agreement, added the "cement
slab" language and set a target date for park and community center construction.! Excerpts from the
Agreement are noted below:
6.4 Parks In consideration of the vesting provisions of this Agreement, Developer agrees
to dedicate land, construct or fund parks and recreation facilities in the manner required
by the SPA. With reference to the EastLake Parks Agreement approved by the City
Council by Resolution No. 15225 on August 8, 1989, it is the intent of the Parties that
the construction of a concrete slab for a future gymnasium may be accepted by City in
lieu of the gymnasium described in the above mentioned Agreement, provided that the
cost of the Park, including the slab, shall not exceed the limitations set forth in said
EastLake Park Agreement (Section 3.2[B]). City further agrees to accept the
development of 12.9 useable acres of park land for purposes of satisfaction of the
requirements of the SPA as it pertains to EastLake Community Park, the Financing Plan
requirements and this Agreement. City, in conjunction with said undertakings, will agree
to waive the requirement of the payment of any and all Park Land Acquisition and
Development Fees (PAD Fees) for the Project.
Since there was some concern about placing a cap on the $2.6 million dollars, both parties agreed
to use "park development credits" for anything in excess of the $2.6 million dollar estimate.
[M:\HOME\P ARKSREC\Al13\ELPRARKA13j
4
)~~ --</
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
6.10 Acceleration of Park Development In further consideration of the vesting provisions
of this Agreement and City's performance of its duties and obligations under this
Agreement, Developer shall construct the first and second phases of the Community Park
(as defined except for the required maintenance period in the EastLake Parks Agreement
described in Section 6.4) as a single phase of development by August 1991.
The EastLake III Agreement served as the "catchall" Agreement for the following park issues: 1) the loss
of 5 acres of park land due to the privatizing of the area around the lakes (EastLake I), the loss of (2)
acres of park land at the Community Park (EastLake II) and $1,522,009 to pay for and construct a larger
gymnasium at the Community Park (EastLake II).
The Council had agreed to use the 7 acres of park land (Five acres EastLake I/Two acres EastLake II)
as either supplementing a Community Park or neighborhood park in EastLake III. The gymnasium
financing ($1,522,000) is keyed into the approval of the first tentative map in the EastLake Trails
Neighborhood. The specific language is noted below:
(i)
Developer shall make a PAD Fee Advance in the amount of One Million Five
Hundred Twenty-Two Thousand Dollars within sixty (60) days following the
City's written request therefore, which request may be made at any time
following City's approval of the first Tentative Map within the EastLake Trails
neighborhood.
(iii)
Pursuant to the terms and conditions of a separate agreement between Developer
and City, the "EastLake Parks Agreement" which was adopted by the City
Council on August 8, 1989 pursuant to Resolution No. 15225, Developer shall
dedicate an additional five (5) useable acres of improved park area which may,
at City's election, be developed as a separate public neighborhood park in
accordance with City standards or an extension of the community park referenced
hereinabove in Subparagraph (i). In either case, the park area will be improved
to comply with the standards established in the City's Park Dedication Ordinance
for neighborhood parks; and
(iv)
In addition, the Developer shall dedicate an additional two (2) useable acres of
improved park area, to city standards, which may be either, at City's election,
part of the five (5) acre neighborhood park referenced in Subparagraph (iii)
above or an extension of the community park referenced in Subparagraph (i)
above, to make up for the loss of two (2) acres in the EastLake Greens
Community Park. In either case, the usage of the improved park area will be
determined by the Parks and Recreation Commission and Director of Parks and
Recreation;
In January of 1991, the design of the Community Center and Gymnasium was approved by the City
Council. Staff informed the Council that the project would be built in two phases: Phase I included the
[M:\HOMEIP ARKSREC\Al13\ELPRARKA13 ]
5
J~~--.5
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Community Center, the area directly beneath the staff office and men's an women's restrooms; Phase II
included men's and women's locker rooms and the gymnasium.
Phase I construction plans entailed temporarily utilizing the area for the gymnasium as a sand volleyball
court (already installed) versus installing a cement slab. In general, the program included a 9,700 square
foot community center (as opposed to the original 5,500 square foot building) and 11,600 square foot
gym (as opposed to the original 3,500 square foot gymnasium).
During the 1992-1993 budget process, staff informed the Council that the community center cost would
exceed the original cost estimate by $1 millon dollars. It was evident at that time the amount identified
for this project had escalated in cost due to increases in construction cost and the expanded building
program. In addition, the original estimate provided by EastLake's design consultant was far too low
of an estimate to accomplish what had been called out in the construction program.
In any event, due to budgetary constraints, the City at that time was unable to finance the operation and
maintenance of a new community recreation center and the facility was deferred. The deferral also
created the opportunity to explore further and develop adequate funding to build the entire community
center at once, including a gymnasium.
SECURITY DEPOSIT AND PARK DEVELOPMENT FEES
Earlier in this report staff mentioned that EastLake was required to deposit $500,000 security for the 5
acres of land lost in the privatization of the common area around the lake. Likewise, the City had a
requirement to return $500,000 of Park Impact Fees (plus interest) back to EastLake once the construction
documents for the park was executed.
Although the construction documents were executed a couple of years ago, staff held on to the Park
Development Fees ($500,000 plus interest $300,000) because EastLake failed to deposit cash security for
the 5 acres of park land owed to the City. The funds have remained in a separate Park Development
Account and have not been spent.
WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
Since the gymnasium already contains a financing mechanism in the EastLake Greens Agreement, the
only recreation component left to deal with is the community center.
The proposed amended Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) language submitted by staff holds
EastLake accountable to their previous obligation to the City - financing and constructing a community
center. The PFFP states the following:
"As the Community Center was not constructed nor guaranteed, EastLake will be required to
bond $700,000 for the Center. In addition, the City may require EastLake to address any
shortfall in improvement monies between the total amount of PAD fees that would have been paid
[M:\HOME\P ARKSREC\A113\ELPRARK.A13]
6
)~.6-b
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
by the Greens Project at buildout compared to the amount of park improvements credited through
turnkey public park construction and private park credits. The PAD fees credit shall be those
fees in place at the time of final maps for the Greens are approved.
The construction of the community center could be funded from a variety of sources including
but not limited to future PAD fee obligations, interest accrued that the City is holding from
earlier park fees paid for construction of the EastLake Community Park, and park obligations
from the "land swap" parcel that EastLake will be developing in the future as well. Future
interest accrual on any monies the City is holding for EastLake Park may also be used for the
Community Center construction. "
As noted earlier in this report, EastLake is opposed to the language in the amended PFFP and has
suggested this language:
As the Community Center was not constructed nor funded by a specified advance, future projects
within the vicinity of EastLake (EastLake III) and other area properties, will be considered a
potential sources of funds for the Community Center.
The construction of the Community Center will be funded from existing and future Park
Development Fee receipts. The use of the City's current Park Development Fee fund is
programmed as shown in Table 1 (attached). Future updates of this program will identify the
gym and Community Center as improvement program components. The City currently hold
$309,865 in interest earned on the EastLake Park Development Reimbursement account. While
the principal amount of the deposits in the reimbursement account ($477,296) is owed to
EastLake Development Company the aforementioned accrued interest will be deposited into the
PAD Fee account and programmed with other funds to construct the Community Center in the
future. A park development reimbursement to EastLake of $477,296 will occur at the time of
the transfer of the accrued interest to the PAD Fee account.
Basically, EastLake believes they have met the park obligation for the Community Park. The fact that
the park cost is slightly less than the $2.6 million dollars has relieved the Company of their community
center obligation. Furthermore, EastLake believes that the Center should be shared with other developers
paying park fees.
EastLake has proposed the City utilize the interest earned on the fees collected in EastLake I ($309,865)
as their contribution to the Center. Staff believes EastLake has not met this center obligation as noted
in the aforementioned development agreements. Further they are attempting to allocate this financial
responsibility to other builders and landowners in this City. This was not the intent of previous City
Councils.
Therefore, staff recommends that EastLake bond for $700,000 (to serve as security for the Community
Center) and allocate $300,000 in interest earned toward the construction of this facility.
[M:\HOME\P ARKSRECIA113\ELPRARK.A13]
7
)~6 . 7
Item
Meeting Date 12/12/95
FISCAL IMPACT: In the future, when the Community Center is constructed, there will be a financial
impact for the operation and maintenance of this facility. However, there may not be an additional
impact to the City for facility construction as the facility will be guaranteed by bonds and funded through
a variety of techniques in the EastLake Greens and EastLake III. If the Council accepts the applicant's
language, the facility could be funded through Park Development Fees, however, the amount of Park
Development Fees collected may not be adequate to finance the facility.
Attachments: A-
B-
C-
Letter from EastLake Development Company dated November 17, 1995
EastLake Master Plan from Wimmer Yamada & Associates dated June 27, 1988
EastLake Park Master Plan
[M:\HOME\l' ARKSREC\Al13\ELPRARK.A13j
8
/~/3'8"
Attachment A-l
Revised 7/14/89
EASTLAKE PARK AGREEMENT
THIS PARK AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is 'entered into on
J.Jllt1 08-08 , 1989 by and between . EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California general partnership, comprised of corporations
("Developer") and THE CITY OF CHOLA VISTA, a municipal
corporation having Charter power ("City"), collectively referred
to hereinafter as "the Parties".
ARTICLE I - RECITALS
1.1 Background. The Ci ty has previous ly approved a
development known as EastLake Hills and EastLake Shores
(WEastLake rW). EastLake I included private parks which would be
maintained by EastLake I homeowners while allowing limited access
to the public at-large. It is now the desire of the Parties to
remove pub 1 ic access to these pr i va tely ma i n ta ined pa r k s and to
substitute other park lands and improvements for the loss of this
public access.
1.2 Intention of the Parties.
Parties intend to:
By this Agreement, the
(a) resolve the open space and park land obligations of
Developer for EastLake I;
(b) agree that the obligations of the Developer
respect to the Development Agreement relating to
provision of public parks or public access or
payment of fees in lieu thereof, are satisfied;
with
the
the
(c) define certain additional public park obligations
beyond those listed in the original Development
Agreement; and
(d) provide assurances to the Ci ty that the Developer
will give 5 additional acres of park land to compensate
the City for the loss of access to the neighborhood
parks in EastLake I.
1.3 Benefits to the City.
gain additional park space
compensate for the loss of
parks in EastLake I.
By this Agreement, the City will
and earlier park improvements to
public access in the neighborhood
1.4 Benefits to Developer. This agreement will relieve
Developer of the responsibility to provide for public access to
the neighborhoOd parks in EastLake I.
-1-
1~,1
NOWr THEREFORE, in consideration
agreements set forth herein, the considerations
recitals 'and other valuable consideration,
s u f f i c i e n cy 0 f w h i c h are her e b y a c k now 1 e d g ed,
as set forth below.
of
set
the
the
Attachment A-2
the mutual
forth in the
receipt and
Parties agree
ARTICLE 2 - DEFINITIONS
2.1 "Association" shall mean EastLake I Community
As s 0 cia t ion, t hat p r i vat e , non - pro fit cor po rat ion w h i c h has a f!
ownership interest in various park and open space areas in the
EastLake I Community (EastLake Hills and EastLake Shores),
including, but not limited to, the trail surrounding the
perimeter of the EastLake Shores Lake ("Lake Trail").
2.2 "Developer" shall mean the EastLake Development Company
and the legal persons to which or to who it may assign all or any
portion of its rights under the Agreement.
2.3 "Effective Date"
above-written.
shall mean the day and year first
2.4 "Property" shall mean the following real property: (i)
real property commonly known as EastLake I which consists of
neighborhoods known as the EastLake Hills, EastLake Shores,
EastLake village Center and the EastLake Business Park, all as
more particularly described in Exhibit .A" attached hereto and
incorporated herein ~ (ii) real property commonly known as
EastLake II which consists of the neighborhoods to be known as
the EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails, all as more particularly
described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein:
and, (iii) certain undeveloped real property commonly knowr. as
the balance of the EastLake Planned Community, as more
particularly described in Exhibit .C. attached hereto and
incorporated herein.
ARTICLE 3 - DEVELOPER'S OBLIGATION
3.1 Condition Precedent. Developer shall use its best
efforts to deliver, or cause to be delivered, to City a deed
conveying all right, title and interest in the existing trail
encircling the EastLake Shores Lake within EastLake I. The
actual delivery to City of such a deed and final City action to
amend the EastLake Specific Plan shall be a condi tion precedent
to Developer's obligations hereunder with the exception of
Section 3.2(b) regarding the 14.7 acre park.
3.2 Developer's Commitment.
following:
(a) Developer shall construct twelve
benches meeting the standards approved
major pUblic trail system components
months of execution of this agreement.
Developer agrees to do the
(12) lake trail
by the Ci ty for
within six (6)
-2-
/~73-//)
Attachment A .. ,
(b) Developer shall construct a 14.7 acre park
i"Community Park") adjacent to the proposed EastLake
High School within twenty-four (24) months of the
effective date of this Agreement. Upon completion of
the construction of the Community'. Park and the
expiration of a normal' maintenance period for pUblic
facilities, Developer shall convey the Community Park
site to the City.
Community Park improvements shall be as described in the
Wimmer Yamada & Associates Master Plan Estimate,
attached as Exhibit -A". It is estimated that the tots]
improvements will cost $2,605,043. Developer shall be ~.
entitled to park credits for its actual cost in
constructing the improvements. Actual costs shall
include only the following:
1) Construction costs including site preparation,
grading, soil testing and compaction costs:
2)
Landscaping,
costs~
architectural
and
engineering
3) Labor and material costs~
4) Insurance, fees and permit costs.
City shall retain the right to approve all construction
plans and deny credit for any costs deemed unreasonable
by the City.
Th is cred i t shall be appl i ed aga inst Develope r 's fu tu r;-.'.l
park acquisition and development obligations for
EastLake Trails portion of EastLake II.
.........._.~ .
(c) Develope! shall fund the construction of lighting
for 6 tennis courts to be built in conjunction with the
proposed EastLake High School. (The referenced six
tennis courts are in addition to the two courts required
for funding as a condition in the EastLake Greens
Tentative Map approval). Developer shall provide such
funding within sixty (60) days of the execution of
contracts for the construction of the lighting.
(d) Developer shal provide five (5) extra acres of
fully improved park land to the City. These additional
five (5) acres of park land shall not be credited
against any future park acquisition and development
obligations of the Developer. City will deposit
$500,000 in impact fees previously collected from
Developer to be used for the purpose of constructing the
-3-
/~ e ~ /1
AttachmE;lt A-4
improvements set forth in Exhibit "A". Developer shall
d~posit with the City, $500,000 as security for its duty
to provide the five extra acres of fully improv~d park
land. Developer shall deposit this amount within sixty
(60) days of the date of this agreement.
ARTICLE 4 - CITY OBLIGATIONS
4.1 City Commitment. City agrees to the following:
(a) Upon receipt of the deed for the Lake Trail, City
shall maintain the Lake Trail at City expense.
(b) Within seven (7) days after the effective date of
this Agreement, City shall deposit, in an
interest-bearing account if possible, $500,000 in impact
fees previously collected from Developer to be used for
the purpose of constructing the EastLake Communi ty Par k
improvements. This sum, plus interest accrued thereon,
if any, shall be released to Developer upon the
execution of contracts for the construction of the
Community Park. City agrees that the Developers
previously pledged- financial security for "The
construction or these 1m rovements may be ~educed by
th1"s--a-mount. A a ltional EastLake I impact fees
collected from Developer to be used for the purpose of
constructing the EastLake Community Park improvements
shall be released to Develper within sixty (60) days of
the execution of contracts for the construction of the
five (5) acres of park land described in Section 3.2(d)
of this Agreement.
(c) Ci ty hereby waives any and all requirements wi th
respect to park land dedication or the payment of in
lieu fees thereof or both contained in the Development
Agreement for EastLake I and by this Agreement prOVides
Developer with the written acknowledgment of such waiver.
(d) City agrees to remove, by means of a quitclaim
or otherwise, the pUblic access easement to
neighborhood parks in EastLake I while retaining
requirement that these lands be used as open space.
deed
the
the
DATE:
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
a California general partnership
comprised of corporations
DATE:
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
a municipal corporation
By
Mayor
Vista
By
5804a
-4-
/~B '/J-
November 17.,1995
Attachment B-1
Mr. George Krempl
Deputy City Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
ChuIa Vista, CA 91910
RE: Amended EastLake Greens Public Facility rmance Plan - Park Section
Dear George:
\
EastLake Development Company has received the attached memorandum (Exhibit 1)
dated November 14, 1995 from less Valenzela outlining recommended language for
the amended EastLake Greens Public Facility Finance Plan (pFFP). Please be advised
that we do not entirely agree with the proposed language. By this letter we request
that the alternative language provided in the attached Exhibit 2 be considered in lieu
of paragraphs 2 and 3 in less's memorandum. . We understand that staff may not
support EastLake's position in this matter. Should that be the case, we would
respectfully request that our language be presented as an alternative for the City
Council to consider in the approval of the amended PFFP. The basis for this
modification is that EastLake Development Company has fulfilled its (EastLake ..411111111
Greens) Community Park obligation (last amended by the EastLake Greens..
Development Agreement) by funding and constructing the facility that is curren~y in I:' JlSTLAKE
place and operated by the City. We support the concept of fully implementing the IJ"1
EastLake Community Park Plan by constructing a gymnasium/community center ~l~ENT
c.omplex within the EastLake Community Park. If desired by the City in the future.
EastLake Development Company would enter into an agreement to "turnkey" build
the gymnasium/community center. Under such an agreement, the funding source
would be as described herein after and within the amended SPA text.
M.
.-
The interest earned on the EastLake Development Company reimbursement account
($309,865) can be used to partially fund the community center. EastLake's support
for using the accrued interest for this purpose is provided with the understanding that
the City will accept . IUJ'ety bond in lieu of.. S5oo,000 cash deposit u security for
the provision of the seven (7) aaes of improved parle land required under paragraphs
6. 1. l(ili) and 6.1. 1 (IV) of the EastLake m DeveIopment ~
George, even though we have yet to find . mntuaUy agreeable resolution to this
mattec, I want you to know that I sincerely appreciate the time and effort you and
your staff have devoted to our project. If you have any questions please do not
hesitate to call me.
~
Bruce N. Sloan
Vice President
BNSlgmo
Attachments
~"-'cxdllloM\I.-ltIf.f'~
/~~,{j
900 Lane IWerKJe
&.JIte 100
- 0lUIa \1sta. CA ~914
(619) 421'()127
Mx (619) ~1-1m
"II' I ,
LIMoRANDUM
C, - r- ...... . .
r, .. _.. .. , 'V '-..
Attachm~~~~72 ~
/'V(A. IA/ 1'Ff"'?
/
NOV 1 j 1995
PlAN;~iN8
November 14, 1995
TO:
,
.I
FROM:
Luis Hernandez, Senior Planner ()
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and R~.
Proposed Addition to Ea$tLake Greens Public Facility Finance Plan . Parks
Section .
SUBJECf:
The following is recommended by Parks and Recreation for consideration with the EastLake
Greens SPA Amendment as language to be placed in the amended Public Facilities Finance Plan
text:
"The ChuIa Vista Conununity Park Master Plan contemplated the construction of
a community center and gym. With the FY 1992-93 budget, the City decided to
defer the construction of those facilities and proceed with the balance of the
community park construction at an improvement level of $2.6 million. It was
further agreed that the implementation of a gymnasium would be paid for through
an advance of Park, Acquisition and Development (PAD) Funds with the first final
map of Eastlake Trails in an amount of $1.5 million. This requirement is further
documented in the EastJake ill Development Agreement dated May, 1990.
As the Community Center was not constructed nor guaranteed, Eastlake will be
required to bond $700,000 for the Center. In addition, the City may require
EastLake to address any shortfall in improvement monies between the total amount
of PAD fees that would haye been paid by the Greens Project at buildout compared
to the amount of park improvements credited through turnkey public park
constroction and private park credits. The PAD fees credit shall be those fees In
place at the time fmal maps for the Greens are approved.
The construction of the community center could be funded from a variety of sources
fnduding.butnot limited to future PAD fee obUgatlons, Interest accrued that the
City Is holding from earlier park fees paid for construdion . of th~ .Eastlake
Community Park, and park obligations from the "land swap" parcel that Eastlake
will be developing In the future as well. Future Interest accruaI on any monies the
at)' .Is holding for ~e Park may also be used for the Community Center
construction. " .
cc: John D. Goss. City Manager
George Xrcmpl. Deputy City Manager
Martin Schmidt. Parks and Recreation Landscape Architect
.ff'
tNEn'ORK..rvac.lV~.NIN~_r:rI.c. 1995J
Exhibit 1 l.::r 1!:>"llj
AttachmentB -3
SUBSTITUTE LANGUAGE
FOR PARAGRAPHS TWO AND THREE
OF PFFP PARK SECfION
As the Community Center was not constructed nor funded by a specified advance, future projects
within the vicinity ofEastLake (EastLake ill)' and other area properties, will be considered as
potential sources of funds for the Community Center.
The construction of the Conununity Center will be funded from existing and future Park
Development Fee receipts. The use of the City's current Park Development Fee fund is
programmed as shown in Table 1 (attached). Future updates of this program will identify the gym
and Community Center as improvement program components. The City currently holds $309,865
in interest earned on the EastLake Park Development Reimbursement account. While the
principal amount of the deposits in the reimbursement account ($477,296) is owed to EastLake
Development Company the aforementioned accrued interest will be deposited into the PAD Fee
account and programmed with other funds to construct the Community Center in the future. A
park development reimbursement to EastLake of $477,296 will occur at the time of the transfer of
the accrued interest to the PAD Fee account.
Exhibit 2
I~ 6,/~
oj
..
i
11
S-
O(
.
I
~
~ ~
,:!
~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~
5t~g~E!~~g 8.. i.
_ ._:l__ _ .
- =
..
S
.!!
I
t
IL
C
..
K
o
!
o
'0
~ ~
~ ~
....... ";;
:;
.... cr-
y
'" <
:; 'E
fIi :.
a ..
~ ~
~ ~
~ l
01 N
~ ;;;
'li
'ig
&i1
-0.
~S ~E~ ~~~
'2
Ii fE~~~EEE~~~~
~i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~~~
ilL N2eo~~~~~~~8~M Q2~
:JO :;;Olt;;l"Ntn::t...8:;;~__~ \ ~_N
L: - - -; -; -. --
~E
..G.
I iiiiiiiiiiiiii
-
~
I
iii
iiiiiiiiii i
,
ili
iiiiiiiiiiiiii
ii~iiii~i~ ~
.; ~ ci 0
... ca......
~ ~ ~ ~
....-l
'0 ..~
g ],
t ~Si
IL 0....
E I'E E>
.. .. ~IL
l"c: E <
.. g. ~
~c~ti ~I
~I::.c! t-
. ~ D'O IL ~
~el~i c
~r'2;~ J
~jll~ ;_
u 0.< v II >_
ta 'P' U C
U ~~ 'OIL
:;; c
IlL ..
II
Ji
iiiiiiiiii
iiiiiiiiiiiiii
000
.... ....
i~iii~iii~
en f'i ,..:
... ... ....
o ..... .....
... ....
.... ....
"'S!CCiOCOCiiii'"'
~i5"""" ~............ :;
vici c:n .-
O\~.... N
;l.... Itt --:
... N
.... ....
iii
~ii~~i~ii~
;: !.~ ~ N
eft 11)" ~
.... .... ...
1I11allall:U ~
~
~
.....,
s:Q
<
f-I
i~iiiiii~~iii~
N ON o.
N I()..- f'I")
.. N tJIIt N
~ .... ...
~~~
g2g'
...........
........
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~t'l~~S!ltnlQ~t:!Q8 :!
"":l- ..:l!:t~-~.. ~
-
aai
-.~~II~~1111 ~ . I . 111111.' I
! iil!l!al!II!I~ 181 i!ili5~i~~
I .. - ..
_ E ~
JII .it!U-. Ii Udhj'l
f Jltfll~illsJ jji ffflllJl i
! 'ilt IIJelllf'l Ii I IIIIlff!f I
I J!jliJiolllri!jl .fl, 111'o!!I!I!
.
I 8gg~..~GI.~81 II 2~~~.g~l~
l iiiiiiiiiiiii II iiiiiiiii
~
J~B~/b
Attachment 8-4
en
st
I
~ I
~ .!!
.. i
a
! I
..
Ii
1
J
I
I
J I
:i !
I I
CWIMMEl( ~ADA l!?c..ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE. LAND PLANNING
EASTLAKE CXlMMJNlTl' PARK
Pnase:r.sCorrstr.uction (Revised)
June 27, 1988
1. Mobilization
2. Site grading (fine)
3. So11 preparation
4. Drainage
5. Road/parking area
6. Curbs
7. Concrete Walks
8. Special concrete areas
(at ball fields only)
9. OG path
10. S1gnwal1/ftserpent"
11. picnic tables/pads (18)
12. picnic shelters (5)
13 . Mowcurbs
14. Bike racks (2)
15. Removable bollards (9)
16. Benches (6)
17. Trash receptacles (8)
18. Play area equipment
19. lnf iel ds
20. Backstops
21. Fencing @ sidelines
22. Base pads"
23. Soccer ~oal s
24. Irrigation
25. Lawn
26. Slope planting
27. Trees
28. Restroom/storage
29. East-half field lighting
30. Electrical (stub up
remaining fields)
31. :-Ma i ntenance
TOTJ.J..:
15% CONTINGENCY:
GRAND TOT Ii. :
S 10,000.00
S 29,500.00
$147,500.00
S 25.000.00
.S 27,200.00
S 9,600.00
$"39,000.00
S 47,1S5.00
S 1,600.00
.. S 40,000.00
S 13,500.00
S 33,750.00
$ 1,000.00
$ 1,000.00
S l,SOO.OO
$ 4,200.00
$ 2,700.00
$ 37,825.00
$ 12,400.00
S 30,000.00
$ 1,260.00
S 600.00
'S 6,000.00
$267,000.00
S 21,265.00
S 31,700.00
S 37,930.00
Sl27 ,500.00
$ 50,000.00
S 30,000.00
$ 35,400.00
-----------
---------
$1,114,415.00
$ 167,162.00
-------------
----------
$1,281,577.00
Note: Park devel o~ent fees of k~---
$S2,500.00/acre x 15.6 acres = ~$1,2S7 ,000.00 -~
JqScPH Y. YAMA[).t.. F.A.S-LA. and RONALD S- TESHIMA. A.S.LA.. PRINCIPALS .
$10 FIFTH AVENUE/s;.N DIEGO. C,A.uFORNIA 9'2101/(6191 '232..00.
2~12 CA~r THOMAS ROAD ,10/PHOENIX. ARIZONA 8S010/{0021 951>-9269
CA R.g. '528 and :1456
/.s-6.-11
Attachment C-l
Hott.r'" ! W'''''''''''@ol', ,... S.l..... (181'jl~.1gecl
Page Two
EASTLAKE COMM.JNITl' PARK
Phase I Construction (Revised)
June 27, 1988
Attachment C-2
The following items are not incluQed in Phase I and would be installed in
future Phases II & III:
1. Community center/multipurpose gym area.
2. Outdoor patio & furnishings.
3. Tot lot, trellis & seatwall.
4. Trash enclosure.
5. West-half ball field lighting -1>oles & fixtures only.
6. Bleachers. I
7. Exercise course.
8. Vall eyball court.
1.r-6,IK
C"WJMMER... Y.:4MADA &->c:,ASSOCIATES
LANDSCAPE ~RCHITECTURE . LAND PLANNING
EASTLAKE COMMUNITY PARK
Master Plan Estimate of Anticipated Construction Company
June 15, 1988
ITEH: QUANTITl' : UNIT COST:
1. MOBILIZATION/START-UP COSTS j
a) Allowance LS $10,000.00
2. SITE GRADING/PREPARATION
a) Fi ne grad1 ng 590,000 s.f. .05
b) Soil prep.lamending 590,000 s.f. .25
c) Drainage systans LS 25,000.00
Attachment C-3
HOUle" ! W.__~ FA 'S l'" PS9QI91!CI
TOT AL :
3.
PAVING CONSTRUCTION
a) Road/parking asphalt
b) Concrete curbs
c) Broan fi n. concrete wal ks
d) Salt fin. col. conc. paving
e) Decanposed granite path
f) City logo medallion
16,000 s.f.
800 1. f.
20,000 s.f.
30,500 s.f.
16,000 s.f.
550 s.f.
1. 70
12.00
1.50
2.50
.10
2.50
4. MISCELLANEOUS CONSTRUCTION
a) Sand placement (12" depth):
1- Tot lot area 45 c.y. 13.00
2. Pl ay area 195 c.y. 13.00
3. Vo; leyball area 130 c.y. 13.00
b) Retaining walls (concrete) 210 l.f. 30.00
c) Signwall/serpent LS 40,000.00
d) Co nc . picnic table on pad 18 ea. 750 .00
e) Concrete picnic table 6 ea. 600.00
f) Met a 1 prefab shel ter roof
(32Ssf) on concrete co1 umns
w/ concrete sl abs & BOO grill s 5 ea. . 6,750.00
g) Kiosk 1 ea. LS
h) Mowcurb '250 1. f . 4.00
1) Fl agpol es (30' ht. ) 3 ea. 2,000.00
j) Bike racks 2 ea. 500.00
k) Tree grates 48 ea. 500.00
1 ) Removable bollards 9 ea. 200.00
m) Concrete benches 8 ea. 700.00
n) Trash receptacl e 12 ea. 300.00
0) Park info./directory signage LS 5,000.00
JOSEP~ y. YAM~c;. f.,t. S.l.A o~" RONALD S. TESHlMA. A.S.L...... PRINCIPAlS
516 flF~."" "I.'ENl.:f:~N DIEGC ..;..L1fORNI.. 97101/(61917n.AOO'
751. EAST THO".":'S ~c,.:,o .IO;P~Oi:NI7.. ..RIZON':' 8'.016/(607: 956.9769
CA j(~,J. eS18 ond :ri.:~e
/~~,I/j
S 10,000.00
S 29,500.00
S147,500.00
S 25,000.00
S 27,200.00
S 9,600.00
S 30,000.00
S 76,250.00
S 1,600.00
S 1,375.00
S 585.00
S 2,535.00
S 1,690.00
S 6,300.00
S 40,000.00
S 13,500.00
S 3,600.00
S 33,750.00
S 3,000.00
S 1,000.00
S 6,000.00
S 1,000.00
S 24,000.00
S 1,800.00
S 5,600.00
S 3,600.00
S 5,000.00
Page T..o
EASTLAKE COMM.JNITY PAAK
Master Plan Estimate of Anticipated Construction Company
June 15, 1988
ITEM :
QUANTITY:
5. RECREATIONAL AREA CONSTRUCTION
a) Tot lot equi pment:
1. Spray porpoise (../pumps'
and basin) LS
2. Spring riders 4 ea.
3. Spinner 1 ea.
4. Saddle slide .1 ea.
5. Cli mb i ng castl e 1 ea.
6. Shovel/seat 1 ea.
7. Wood deck 50 s.f.
b) Play area equipment:-
1. Play structure w/shock mats LS
2. Arc., swi ng 1 ea.
3. Tree climber 3 ea.
4. Castle climber 2 ea.
5. Spring toys 4 ea.
6. Concrete posts 9 ea.
7. Seat walls (concrete) 135 l.f.
c) Volleyball posts/net 1 ea.
d) Exercise course (7-station) LS
e) Crushed brick infields 62,000 s.f.
f) Arch backstops 4 ea.
g) Sideline fencing (3') 360l.t.
h) Base pads 4 sets
i) Movable soccer goal s 4 sets
j) Bl eachers 8 ea.
6. PLANTING/IRRIGATION CONSTRUCTION
a) Irrigation
(w/computer control) .522,000 s.t.
b) Lawn (seed) 425,300 s.t.
c) Slope shrubs 3,870 ea.
d ) S 1 a pe trees:
1. 5-gall 200 ea.
2. lS-gallon 250 ea.
e) Sycamore trees (48") 38 ea.
f) Cottonwood trees (3611) 20 ea.
g) Fl ame trees (24") 40 ea.
h) Queen Palms Cl4'ht.) 20 ea.
7. AROi lTECTURAL OJNSTRUCTION
a) Community Center
b) Trell i s/a rbar
c) Multi-purpose gym
d) Storage/restroom
e) Trash enclosure
5,500 s.t.
1,500 s.t.
3,500 s. t.
1,500 s.t.
100 s.f.
--
/~~J'~
UNIT OJST:
2,400.00
537.00
850.00
1,200.00
1,700.00
250.00
23 .00
17,350.00
2,400.00
2,000.00
1,700.00
2,150.00
200.00
35.00
200.00
4,800.00
.20
7,500.00
3.50
150.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
.51
.05
5.00
18.00
75.00
1,500.00
693.00
269.00
500.00
100.00
16.00
90.00
5.00
20.00
Attachment C-4
TOTAL :
S 2,400.00
S 2,150.00
S 850.00
S 1,200.00
S 1,700.00
S 250.00
5 1,150.00
S 17,350.00
S 2,,400.00
S 6,000.00
$ 3,400.00
S 2,150.00
5 1,800.00
S 4,725.00
S 200.00
S 4,800.00
S 12,400.00
$ 30,000.00
$ 1,,260.00
$ 600.00
S 4,000.00
5 16,000.00
I
$267,000.00
$ 21,265.00
$ 19,350.00
S 3,600.00
$ 18,750.00
S 57,000.00
$ 13,860.00
5 10,760.00
S 10,000.00
5550,000.00
S 24,000.00
5315,000.00
$127,500.00
S 2,,000.00
Attachment C-5
Page Th ree
EASTLAKE COMMJNITY PARK
Master Plan Estimate of Anticipated Construction Company
June 15, 1988
I T'E'-i :
O!JANTI1Y :
~~
.~
'J
UNIT COST: \ TOTAL:
,
8. ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION
a) Walk/parking area lights
b) Ball fi el d (2-soccer/
2S0-football cluster)
LS
60,000.00
,$ 60,000.00
2 ea.
50,000.00
5100,000.00
9. MAINTENANCE
a) 90-day
b) 270-day
~-~
C~~~~S~~~)
.06
I
TOTAL: $2,265,255.00
15% CONTINGENCY: $ 339,788.00
------------
-----------
..
GRAND TOTAL: $2,605,043.00
Note: 1) Estimate does not include costs to light 1/2 of High School
school tennis courts. Estimate is 560,000.00 to light 6 courts.
2) Estimate does not include costs to construct 1/2 of High School
tenni s courts. Estimate is $120,000.00 to construct 6 courts
w/fenci ng.
I ~ 1!3 .. d.l
./
/~ {;1 ./
::1/ /~~
Project Description
Planning Commission
- Staff Report
- Resolutions
- Ordinance
City Council
- Staff Report
- Resolutions
- Ordinance
General Development Plan
SPA Plan
Planned Community
District Regulations
Air Quality
Water Conservation
Public Facility Financing Plan
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
AND
SUMMARY
EastLake Greens GDP/SP A Plan Amendments
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments consist of relocating two neighborhood parks
(parcels P-3 & P-5), transferring densities among parcels within the SPA, expanding the
acreage available for community purpose facilities (PQ) and designating Parcel R-26 for low
income housing in accordance with the recently adopted EastLake Affordable Housing
Program and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement. The summary of these
amendments is as follows:
Relocate two neighborhood park parcels:
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3, public and P-5, private)
respond to final master plan refinements intended to improve the recreational
facilities and add to the quality of living at EastLake. The overall result is an
increase of 3.7 net usable park land acres.
Expand the area available for community purpose facilities (PQ):
Section 19.48.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CYMC) requires that
all planned community (PC) districts designate land for community purpose
facilities (PQ) at a rate of 1.39 acres per 1,000 population. The current
EastLake Greens SPA plan, with 2,871 dwelling units, provides a total of 17.1
acres in two separate parcels (PQ-1 and PQ-2), or about 2 acres per 1,000
population (see Exhibit C).
The proposed amendments reduce the acreage on Parcel PQ-1 from 12.3 to
10.3 (-2 acres), increase the acreage on Parcel PQ-2 from 4.8 to 15.8 (+ 11
acres) and reduce the total number of dwelling units from 2871 to 2738
(-133). With the reduction of 133 dwelling units and the added acreage, the
ratio would be increased to 3.2 acres/ 1,000 population.
Although the gross acreage provided for community purpose facilities exceeds
the Chula Vista Municipal Code requirement, a total of 15 acres are either
used for other purposes or have limited use. Thus, the net usable acreage is
about 11.1 acres which represents about 1.37 acres per 1,000 population.
Transfer Densities among parcels within the SPA:
The density transfers and parcel boundary adjustments are market-based
changes and planned community plan refinements intended to improve the
quality of the neighborhoods. These changes will result in a reduction of 133
units without significant change to the original planned community design and
housing mix composition. Aside from parcel R-26, which reflects an increase
of 200 units (see R-26 discussion on page 6), five other parcels are involved
in major density adjustments of more than 12 units, and 9 parcels are involved
in minor density adjustments (see page 3 of this report).
Land use boundary adjustment:
As a result of the parks relocation and density transfers, the land use
boundaries have been modified. However, the original development pattern
and circulation system remains the same. The boundary changes will be
incorporated in the EastLake Greens Master Tentative Map through a lot line
adjustment process.
Designate parcel R-26 for low and moderate income housing:
The Affordable Housing Program implementation strategies identify parcel
R-26 as the first low income housing site within the Greens, and it is expected
to provide the bulk of the Greens low income housing commitment. For this
reason, the land use designation is proposed to be changed from Interim Low
Medium Density (3-6 du/ac) to Medium High Density (11-18 du/ac) and the
number of dweJIing 1units increased from 60 to 260. It should also be noted
that the site increased in area from 13.3 to 15.3 acres.
There are no unresolved issues on this project between the applicant and City Planning
staff.
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCM-96-07;. Consideration of amendments to the
EastLake II General Development Plan (EastLake I Extension), EastLake
Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA), Planned Community District
Regulations, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation Plan
and Public Facilities Financing Plan.
The EastLake Development Company has requested amendments to the EastLake II General
Development Plan (EastLake I Expansion), EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA),
Planned Community District Regulations, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation
Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan. The purpose of these amendments is to:
· Relocate two neighborhood park parcels,
· Expand the area available for community purpose facilities (PQ)
· Transfer Densities among parcels within the SPA
· Adjust land use and parcel boundaries
· Designate parcel R-26 for low income housing in accordance with the recently adopted
EastLake Affordable Housing Program and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing
Agreement.
The documents affected by the amendments, as proposed to be revised, have been provided for
your consideration and approval (see Sections 4-8).
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new or supplemental EIR is
necessary and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake Greens, which must
be considered by the Planning Commission prior to a decision on the project (see attachment
4).
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt attached Resolution PCM-96-07 recommending that the City Council approve the
proposal in accordance with the attached ,draft City Council Resolution and Ordinance based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
DISCUSSION:
The EastLake Greens Planned Community is located on the south side of Otay Lakes Road
between Hunte Parkway and the future alignment of the SR-125 Freeway (see Locator/ Exhibit
A).
/;,
J/
Page 2, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments consist of relocating two neighborhood parks
(parcels P-3 & P-5), transferring densities among parcels within the SPA, expanding the
acreage available for community purpose facilities (PQ) and designating Parcel R-26 for low
income housing in accordance with the recently adopted EastLake Affordable Housing Program
and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement (see Section 5 Appendix A).
The General Plan Designations for the parcels involved are Residential Low Medium Density
(3-6 dulac) and Residential Medium High Density (11-18 dulac). The Greens, however, is
planned to be developed at about 4.5 dulac. The non-residential parcels are designated, Parks
and Recreation (P) and Public & Quasi-Public (PQ).
The existing EastLake Greens GDP and SPA are not consistent with the Housing Element of
the General Plan. However, the proposed amendments would bring these documents into
conformance.
The following paragraphs discuss each of the proposed amendments in more detail:
General Development Plan Amendment (Section 4)
The General Development Plan text, map and statistical tables are proposed to be amended to
reflect the proposed land use designation boundary adjustments and the following land use
designation modifications which represent the requested density transfers and park relocations:
Parcel
Change From
To
R-I0
R-12
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
M (medium 6-11 du/ac)
LM & P (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac
Park and Recreation)
R-18
R-20
R-21
R-23
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
M (Medium 6-11 du/ac)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
LM, Low Medium (3-6 du/ac)
No change
DELETED
LM & P (Low Medium 3-6
du/ac & Park & Rec)
MH (Medium High 11-18 du/ac)
(Removes Interim Designation)
PQ (Public Quasi-Public)
LM (Low Medium 3-6 dulac)
R-26
LM (Low Medium 3-6 du/ac)
(Interim Designation)
P (Parks and Rec)
P (Parks and Rec)
P-3
P-5
The proposed changes, which includes a reduction in the total number of dwelling units from
6660 to 6527 (-133 ) are illustrated in the proposed GDP Plan (see Exhibits B-1 & B-2).
// /-
. /'
/~
I
/
Page 3, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
EastLake Greens Sectional PlanniDl!: Area (SPA) Plan Amendment (Section 5)
The SPA amendment includes the relocation of two neighborhood parks, density transfers, land
use boundaries adjustment, expansion of the community purpose facilities land use designation
PQ, minor refinements to the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), and designating parcel
R-26 for low income housing.
Neighborhood Parks Relocation
The neighborhood park identified as P-3 in the site utilization plan is presently shown
on the east side of EastLake Parkway, partially within the southerly utility easement
(see Exhibit C). The park site contains 11 acres, but 4.7 acres are within the SDG&E
easement located along the south end of the parcel. Thus, the net usable park land is
about 6.3 acres. The park is proposed to be moved to the 10 acre site presently
identified as R-21. This parcel, which is targeted for 120 units, would be deleted and
the acreage transferred to the public quasi-public parcel PQ-2 (see Exhibit D). Although
the gross acreage of the new park location is smaller, the net usable park land acreage
provided for the EastLake Greens increases by approximately 3.7 acres.
The three acre private neighborhood park identified as parcel P-5 (see Exhibit C) is also
proposed to be relocated to the southwest corner of South Greens View Drive and
Hunte Parkway (see Exhibit D). The park acreage remains the same but the new
location provides better exposure and linkage to the open space lot and trails located
directly across South Greens View Drive.
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3 and P-5) respond to final master plan
refinements intended to improve the .Planned Community's recreational facilities and
add to the quality of living at EastLake.
Density Transfers
The density transfers and parcel boundary adjustments are market based changes and
planned community plan refinements intended to improve the quality of the
neighborhoods. These changes will result in a reduction of 133 dwelling units without
significant change to the original EastLake Greens Planned Community design.
For the purpose of this report, the density transfers can be categorized as minor and
major. Minor density transfers are those that involve an increase or reduction of 12 or
less units and do not include changes in the GDP, Land Use Plan designations or in the
residential type. The following list reflects the proposed minor density transfers:
,/ f-,
, /
/
1,,- ~.
Page 4, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
Parcel R-3 -10
Parcel R-4 +10
Parcel R-6 -12
Parcel R-12 -1
Parcel R-15 -1
Parcel R-22 -2
Parcel R-24 +2
Parcel R-27 -4
Parcel R-28 -9
The acreage and target densities have changed slightly on these parcels but the unit type
and GDP land use designation remain unchanged (see Exhibit C).
Major density transfers, which are those involving more than 12 units and which
require changes in the GDP and Land Use District Designations, are as follows:
Parcel 16: The acreage on this parcel increased from 10.5 to 10.9 (+ 0.4 ac) and the
number of units increased from 83 to 109 (+26 units). The target density has also
changed from 7.9 to 10 dulac which is consistent with the existing GDP designation of
Residential Medium Density.
Parcel 18: On this parcel the acreage doesn't change, but the number of units is
reduced from 87 to 54 (-33 units). Consequently, the density is reduced from 8.8 to 5.5
and the GDP designation change from Medium Density (6-11 dulac) to Low Medium
Density (3-6 dulac).
Parcel 20: For this parcel, the acreage is reduced from 15.7 to 14.3 (-1.4 acres) and
the number of units reduced from 146 to 109 (-37 units). The overall results is a
reduction in density from 9.0 to 7.6 dulac. which is consistent with the existing GDP
designation of Medium Density (6-11 dulac)
Parcel 21: This parcel is deleted and the acreage transferred to parcel PQ-2 (-10 ac
& -120 units).
Parcel 23: The acreage on this -parcel is increased from 15.8 to 20.3 (+4.5 ac), but
the dwelling units have been reduced from 214 to 72 (-142 units). The reduction in
units results in a decrease in density from 13.3 to 3.5 dulac, a change in land use
designation from Medium High Density (11-18 dulac) to Low Medium Density (3-6
dulac), and change in residential unit type from Residential Condominium to
Residential Estates.
Pi
r:7
/
Page 5, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
Parcel 26: The acreage on this parcel is increased from 13.3 to 17 acres (+3.7 ac)
and the number of units from 60 to 260. The density increases from 4.5 to 19.5 du/ac
(+ 15 du/ac) which changes the GDP land use designation from Interim Low Medium
Density (3-6 du/ac) to Medium High Density (11-18 du/ac). The increase in density
would allow EastLake to implement the recently adopted EastLake Greens Affordable
Housing Program.
The proposed density transfers result in an overall reduction of density (133 dwelling
units) without a significant change in the original master plan design. The site
utilization plan is proposed to be amended to reflect the proposed General Development
Plan and SPA Plan changes (see Exhibit D).
Boundary Adjustments
As a result of the relocation of the park sites and the density transfers, the configuration
of Parcel 10 has been modified, and the acreage reduced from 45.4 to 34.6 acres (-10.8
acres). The number of units, however, remains the same (246). The overall result is an
increase in density from 5.4 to 7.1 du/ac which changes the GDP land use designation
from Low Medium Density (3-6 du/ac) to Medium Density (6-11 du/ac) (see Exhibits
B-1 and B-2).
The reconfiguration of Parcel 10 and other parcels discussed in the Density Transfer
Section of this report do not change the original development pattern and circulation
system of the EastLake Master Plan. These boundary adjustments would be
incorporated in the EastLake Greens Master Tentative Map through a separate lot line
adjustment process.
Expansion of the Community Purpose Facilities (PQ) land use designation
Section 19.48.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code requires that all planned
community (PC) districts designate land for community purpose facilities at a rate of
1.39 acres per 1,000 population. The current EastLake Greens SPA plan, with 2,871
dwelling units, provides a total of 17.1 acres in two separate parcels (PQ-l and PQ-2),
or about 2 acres per 1,000 population (see Exhibit C).
The proposed amendments reduce the acreage on Parcel PQ-l from 12.3 to 10.3 (-2
acres), increase the acreage on Parcel PQ-2 from 4.8 to 15.8 (+ 11 acres) and reduce
the total number of dwelling units from 2871 to 2738 (-133). With the reduction of
133 dwelling units and the added acreage the ratio would be increase to 3.2 acres/ 1,000
population.
....1
(
f
/,
Page 6, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
Although the gross acreage provide for community purpose facilities exceeds the Chula
Vista Municipal Code requirement, a total of 15 acres are either used for other purposes
or have limited use. Parcel PQ-l (10.3 ac) is presently occupied by an existing water
storage tank and 4.7 acres of the expanded Parcel PQ-2 are within an utility easement.
Thus, the net usable acreage is about 11.1 acres which represents about 1.37 acres per
1,000 population. This ratio is more in keeping with the CVMC requirement. It is
important to note, however, that the area within the utility easement could be used for
outdoor type uses in conjunction with a community facility and that the excess acreage
could potentially be used when the EastLake's southerly adjacent land is master
planned.
Designation of Parcel R-26 for Low and Moderate Income Housing.
The EastLake I General Development Plan (EastLake I extension) designates parcel R-
26 Residential Low Medium Density (3-6 dulac). However, in December 1993, The
City Council approved an amendment to the General Plan to increase the density of
parcels R-9 and R-26, and reinstated a previously deferred requirement to provide 10%
of the approved housing units as affordable to low and moderate income households.
To comply with this requirement the City Council approved, in July of this year, an
Affordable Housing Program for the EastLake Greens as well as the remaining
undeveloped portions of EastLake.
The Affordable Housing Program implementation strategies identify parcel R-26 as the
first low income housing site within the Greens and it is expected that this site would
provide the bulk of the Greens low income housing commitment. To enable this to
occur, and consistent with the General Plan for this site, the land use designation is
proposed to be changed from Low Medium Density (3-6 dulac) to Medium High
Density (11-18 dulac), and the allowed number of units increased from 60 to 260. The
above mentioned Affordable Housing Program is being incorporated as part of the
EastLake Greens SPA (Section 5 appendix A)
EastLake Greens Planned Community District Ree:ulations Amendment (Section 6)
The Land Use District Map in the Planned Community District Regulation document is
proposed to be amended to reflect the above mentioned density transfers, land use boundary
adjustments and park relocations. More specifically the Land Use District Plan amendments
are as follows:
Parcel 21
From RC-I5, Residential Condominium to
RS-5, Residential Estates
Parcel 23
From PC-I5, Residential Con,dominium to
OS-4, Open Space
~ .....~.,"
Page 7, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
Parcel P-J
From OS-4, Open Space to
VC-3, Village Center
Parcel P-5
From OS-4, Open Space to
RP-8, Residential Planned Concept & 08-4, Open Space
The existing and proposed land use district designations are illustrated on Exhibit F and G.
EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan. Air Quality Improvement Plan. and Public
Facilities Financine: Plan (Section 7)
As a result of the proposed amendments, minor statistical amendments to the EastLake Greens
Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water Conservation Plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan
are being proposed to reflect updated project data.
The Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP), however, m addition to mmor statistical
amendments and project phasing changes, includes new language reinstating EastLake's
previous agreement to construct a previously deferred community center and gymnasium and
requires that any short fall in improvement monies between the total amount of PAD fees paid
at build out and the amount of park improvements credited through public park construction
and private park credits be addressed by EastLake. (see Section 8).
ANALYSIS
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments incorporate the recently adopted Affordable Housing
Program and identify a parcel to implement the previously deferred requirement to provide
10% of the total units contained within the SPA as affordable to low and moderate income
households. The amendment also brings the GDP and SPA into compliance with the Housing
Element of the Chula Vista General Plan.
The expansion of the Public/Quasi-Public land use designation would reinstate the community
purpose facilities (PQ) acreage taken by the existing water tank and allow the establishment
of more traditional community services, such as churches, day care centers, assembly halls,
etc., in the remaining PQ acreage.
The proposed density transfers, which will result in a reduction of 133 units, will also allow
the developer to respond to present housing market demands and provide land use changes that
complement the existing planned community recreational facilities and quality of life at
EastLake.
_ /1'1
I ,I.
Page 8, Item 3
Meeting Date 11/29/95
CONCLUSION
For the reasons noted above, staff recommends approval of the project in '1ccordance with the
attached Planning Commission resolution.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution
2. Draft City Council Resolutions and Ordinance
3. Exhibits
4. EIR-86-04 Addendum
5. Disclosure Statement
(M:'J-IOME\PLANNINGILUISiPCM -9607. RPT
ATIACHMENT 1
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
/-:,; ... /
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-96-07
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE
AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I EXPANSION)
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, PLANED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WATER
CONSERVATION PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN.
WHEREAS, applications for amendments to the EastLake II (Eastlake I Expansion)
General Development Plan (GDP), EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA), Planned
Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water
Conservation and Public Facilities Financing Plan ("Project") were filed with the City of Chula
Vista Planning Department on September 12, 1995, by EastLake Development Company
(Developer); and,
WHEREAS, the propose GDP and SPA Plan Amendments consist of relocating two
future neighborhood park sites (Parcels P-3 and P-5), expanding the area available for
community purpose facilities (PQ), adjusting land use designation boundaries, transfering dnsities
and designating Parcel R-26 for low income housing in accordance with the recently adopted
EastLake Affordable Housing Program and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said Project
and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by it publication in a newspaper
of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the
exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new or
supplemental EIR is necessary, and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake
Greens, which must be consider by the Planning Commission prior to a decision on this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DOES hereby find that the addendum to FSEIR-86-04, EastLake Greens, has been prepared in
accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR
guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Ordinance and Resolution approving
the project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council
, ')
",:]
,~ ,
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this November 29, 1995 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
William C. Tuchscher II
Chairman
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
m: \home \planning \luis\pcm96-07. res
/ .~
. )
.-/
ATTACHMENT 2
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AND
ORDINANCE
/ / :,- /--/
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VIST A APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SP A), PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN,
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING
PLAN.
1.
RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which the subject matter of this resolution are
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit B-1 and B-2 attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, identified as the EastLake General
Development Plan and EastLake Greens SPA Plan Area, ("Project Site");
and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29, 1995, the EastLake Development
Company ("Developer") filed applications for an amendment to: 1) the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan (known
as Document No. C094-183, on file with the office of the City Clerk),
2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan (known as
Document No. C094-184, on file in the office of the City Clerk), 3) the
EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan (known as Document
No. C094-185, on file with the office of the City Clerk), 4) the
EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan (known as Document No.
C094-186, on file with the office of the City Clerk), and 5) The
EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan ( known as document
number C094- -' on file in the office of the City Clerk) ("Project"); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject
matter of 1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan,
previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199; (SPA), all
approved on July 18, 1989; and, 4) an Air Quality Improvement Plan
(EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan) and 5) a Water
Conservation Plan (EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan) and
Public Facilities Financing Plan (Eastlake Greens Public Facilities
-',. ~-
,/ ~.~
Financing Plan), all previously approved by the City Council oN
November 24, 1992, by Resolution No. 16898; and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing
on said project on November 29, 1995, and voted to recommend that the
City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings listed below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 12, 1995, on the
Discretionary Approval Applications, and to received the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
F. WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting, at which this Resolution
was approved December 12, 1995, the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista approved for first reading Ordinance No. amending the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District
Regulations Land Use District Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find, determine and resolve as follows:
II
PLANNING COl\.1MISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission
at their public hearing on this project held on November 29, 1995, and the
minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the
record of this proceeding.
III.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new
supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum the FSEIR-86-04
(B), EastLake Greens, whic;h must be consider by the City Council prior to a
decision on this project.
IV.
INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby finds that the addendum to EIR-86-04 has been
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures
of the City of Chula Vista.
/' /, - ./(~
v.
GDP FINDINGS
A. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS DESCRIBED BY THE
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development
Plan reflects land use distribution and densities, and circulation system
that are consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan Land Use, and
Housing Elements.
B. A PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CAN BE INITIATED
BY ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA PLANS WITlliN TWO YEARS OF THE
EST ABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE.
A SPA Plan has already been approved for the development of the
planned community and amendments thereto conforming to the amended
GDP are included in the Project.
C. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,
THA T SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A
RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY
AND STABILITY; AND THAT IT WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH
OR PROVIDE COMPATIBLE VARIETY TO THE CHARACTER OF
THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND THAT THE SITES PROPOSED
FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS
AND PARKS, ARE ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ANTICIPATED
POPULA TION AND APPEAR ACCEPTABLE TO THE PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF.
The residential densities and transfers reflected on the amended GDP are
compatible with the pattern and character of development approved with
the original GDP, and can be adequately served by the public facilities
incorporated therein.
VI.
SPA FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL .PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I
EXP ANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA
VIST A GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan reflects land
use, circulation system, and public facilities that are consistent with the
EastLake II (EastLake I 'Expansion) General Development Plan and the
Chula Vista General Plan.
7
B. THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN
,
AS AMENDED, WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPrvlENT OF THE INVOLVED
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA.
The SPA Plan, as amended is consistent with the amended phasing of
internal and external infrastructure and consistent with the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Public Facilities Financing Plan, Air Quality
Improvement Plan, and Water Conservation Plan.
C. THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
PLAN AS AMENDED WILL NOT ADVERSEL Y AFFECT
ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT,
CIRCULA TION, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The land uses within the EastLake Greens SPA area represent the same
uses approved by the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan.
D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH
USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPrvlENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN
AREA, LOCATION, AND OVER-ALL DESIGN FOR THE PURPOSE
INTENDED; THA T THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPrvlENT
STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY
AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPrvlENT WILL rvlEET
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The amendments do not involve areas planned for industrial or research
uses.
E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL , RECREATIONAL, AND
OTHER SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPrvlENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION
AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND
THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FORM ANY
ADVERSE EFFECTS FORM SUCH DEVELOPrvlENT.
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3 and P-5) respond to final
master plan refinements intended to improve the Planned Community's
recreational facilities and add to the quality of living at EastLake.
F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHF ARES PROPOSED ARE
SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED
/ ./ ,)
/ ~I .'
TRAFFIC THEREON.
The amendments do not involve changes to the existing circulation
system.
G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
JUSTIFffiD ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED
AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF
THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATIONS(S).
The amendments do not involve areas planned for commercial uses.
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL
COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT.
The amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and
regulations applicable to surrounding areas.
VII.
NOTICE OF DETERl\1INATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice
of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term provision and
conditions herein stated, and that in the event that anyone or more terms,
provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
M:\homelplanning1luisIPCM-9607.RPT
/ ' - .-.-,.. .,.-;
/. / /
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) PLANNED COM1vfUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
(LAND USE DISTRICT MAr ONLY) AND CONSIDERING AN
ADDENDUM TO FSEIR-86-04 (B).
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which are the subject matter of this ordinance are
diagrammatically represented on Exhibit E and F attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, and located within the EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) Planned Community Area of the City of Chula Vista ("Project
Site"); and
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29,1995, the EastLake Development Company
("Developer") filed an application requesting amendments to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations (known as
Document No. _ on file with the office of the City Clerk) Land Use District
Map and Land Use District designations of certain areas within the EastLake
Greens Planned Community ("Project").
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the Project Site has been in part the subject matter of a Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No.
15199 ("EastLake Greens SPA Plan") and Planned Community (P. C.) District
Regulations previously approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2317 (EastLake
II-EastLake I Expansion -Planned Community District Regulations) on July 18,
1989.
D. Planning Commission Record on Applications
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on November 29, 1995, and voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the Planned Community District Regulation Land Use Districts Plan
amendment in accordance with the findings listed below.
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission
at their public hearing on this Project held on November 29, 1995, and the
minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the
/ ~ ,.
~. /7
._.::,/7-.. /_-
record of this proceeding.
E. City Council Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on Dc.:;ember 12, 1995, on the Discretionary
Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning
Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and,
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this ordinance was
introduced for first reading (December 12, 1995), the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista approved Resolution No. _ by which it imposed amendments
on the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan, EastLake
Greens Sectional Planning Area SP A Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality
Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan, and EastLake
Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan.
II NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain
as follows:
A. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new
supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04
(B), EastLake Greens, which must be considered by the City Council prior to
a decision on the project.
B. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that the addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B) has
been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the state EIR guidelines and the Environmental Review procedures
of the city of Chula Vista.
C. FINDINGS FOR P-C PLANNED COI\.1MUNITY ZONE AMEND:MENTS
The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations Land Use
Districts Plan are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and
public necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice
support the amendments.
/ /C) _ _=:j' /
D. APPROVAL OF ZONE AMENDMENTS
The City Council does hereby approve the Planned Community District
Regulation amendment to the Land Use District Map as diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit F.
III. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
IV. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Ordinance is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are
determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable,
this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and
effect ab initio.
V. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after
its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
M :\home\planning\luis\pcm96-07. ord
,,"'/ ",
-~-..:..,_-!
/1 '.~ '
c?" "7
ATIACHMENT 3
EXHIBITS
r
PROJECT
LOCATION
'----
--
EXHIBIT A
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT EASTLAKE DESCRIPTION:
C) APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CO. ,Miscellaneous:
PROJECT Eastlake Greens Request To amend the EasUake Greens SPA (Sectional Planning
ADDRESS:
Area) and the PFFP (Public Facilities Financing Plan).
SCALE: FILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale PCM - 95 - 11
-.,
~
General
Development
Plan
~.\dOI)ted
RESIDENTIAL
MotJt
LAN> USE ACRES DUlAC LNTS
r::J:::J ~ 250.5 ~3 743
~ Low/w.Gun 38ll.6 3-e 2001
~~ 2422 "" 1175 PO
"'"'~ 125' 11-18 lea..
~~ 11.0 1&-27. 250
...... T OWl 1018.7 81S0
N)N-RESCENTIAL L
LAN> U!IE ACRES
~ .... 61.8
V<) =.~ t.8
I-fl ~~K1Img 136.1
~ ap.,8IIKe 187.1
~ Pl.elc/~ 131.1
C!:::J ""a ,,.,,......, 2V54
~ Malllt Cn:Uatllln 21U
......T* 10302
~ ....... ~ 72.11
""-=' T..
2121.8 ac:
. - _c, ....
~J'-""'-'__._____
. .. --.. ... ... c::.... v-. a.... ......
...0 cIu
Amendment Key
_ Areas beIng Amended
EXHIBIT B-1
~ E"ASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMt.NITY BY EASTl.AKE OEVEI.OPMENT CO.
~inti~
~.~!:':.~ ~ ......
.~
I. 1_"_
.< ./i
"J ~,/
Fyhihit 1
General
Development
PI all
ProIlosed
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use
Acres du/ac Units
I Low
LM LowlMedium
M Medium
MH Medium/High
H High
Sub- Total
250.5 0-3
381.0 Q-Ej
251.1 6-11.
115.3 11-18.
11.0 18-27+
1008.9
743
1903
2023
160B
250
6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
C Retail 51.9
C.O Prof. & Admin. 6.B
I.R Res. & Ltd Mfgr. 135.9
o Open Space 187.6
PO PublicJOuasi.Pub. 146.9
P Parks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub- Total 1040 0
~future Urban n:9
Project T alals 2121.8
6527
'.
Amendment Key
_ Areas being Amended
.~_......
.. . .........-. ..... ~ . ..... ......, ~
...------=-
~ E"ASTLAKE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY IV EASTLAKE 0EVEI.0Pt&NT co.
EXHIBIT B-2
~inti "..,
~.~~~ ~ ~
!III.--'
I _ '.......
em.
/ .c ;' ~,,;;; 1'/
EJI
._IIIl'~
\Joe J ~
....
]t
ji
C")
-
:c
:E
)(
w
Z_II ~
:::~: ~ .OGl.U')1Il0lDU')lD...C')NlDU')C')....lIllDO_.CDIIlO.O _
~". 1!U').OOOIllCDGl..IIlGl.IIl..IIl-IIl"".N._......... ...
......' --- C\I" N ----N :e
-'" QIII
a. '::' w
~: I ......OC')..-lDGlC').O""C')U')IIlGlCIIIll..C')O-C')CII""""GlIll :a
~II CliClilri'l''I'lrilrilrilrilriaiaiai'';lri'';'';aioaiClit'St'Saio..ai
... ......... ... ~
Z ...001 CD
o
-
t;:
N
-
...J
-
......
::>
~
-
....
CD
CII
u
.w
C"i:a
I,l
I) f
!'J
I! I
Jt
flU
I ~ n
I liJ
h
~
~
~
.,,~
~,~
~
w
i i
CII
C"i
In
CD
J CC')IIlCIIO-OO""OGl-acC')GlGl._
~=.,g~~:.ftN~~~m.~~~
......COO....."".cC').....""...GlGl...OCCO.C')Gl_ _
~:~~~~g:c;::~=;gg~:~g~~~~~ec ~
.
!! Ji!llll
~u!inllliiiui~
~IJ~ii!!!!!!!!!I:I
~""""~""""""""""""""""""""""""~~~...,"" ~
~~~~~---------------------~-
OccOc~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~o~
:2
11QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~~~~~~~~~~QQ~
i cccccccccc c
! Ji ·
C. .O-NC')."".....IIlGlO-CIIC').""lD...1Il I
m -~~.~~~c~----------NNNNNNNNN
:21 ja:a:ci:a:ci:a:ci:ci:a:a:a:a:a:a:a:ci:ci:ci:a:ci:ci:ci:ci:a:a:ci:ci:ci:
~. I I]] i
a:
. .
... ...
II II
... ... oa
. . 0
III III 0
. . .cl
... ... ...
foo fo< 0
-0 J:l
~ Q) ~ .all
...
... .... - ..0
- Q) . --
. - III II'"
III (/) :Z;.
II c: II U
I:l I:l (tl I:l ... 0
.... Ill..:!
:z; ... I- ... II
IllI 0 (/) 0 .......
e - - III ... ..
. - If .
Ilil =- c: =- OQ.,
..:! ::>
00
LLI "l J; j
~zi~
-=:rUJlS
~LLln
~~c
lilt!)
;:is
~
/i
~.
Zt
<C] ~t
'_I
u.. Q.t
.:'
T.
Z=-II
o
-
~
N
-
...J
-
r-
::::>
Jj-5- .CCIl.."a:>Ca:>."a:>....NNC.CI>..ClCll
.".CIl-C....a:>CIl..CCll.Cla:>C-."."C
~ - N"''' N --
.a
CIlNCCCC- Cl
~""."'le.'" ~
N
u
.
1&-; ~~~~fI)~~~~",":~",:~"'~C!~~C!~ CIl.".CIlCM. :a
NN....~~~~~~~~~~~~=~ :~~m~.m C
ci
J ~":~C!C!~":~~lIl!C'!~~G!G!ll!G!~~
CIl.-.M....C....C..ClN--CClCll..
--NNN__- ~--N---~ --
III
.....M-GJP)t\I- f')
=2.nr--:~cftcc) ~
...
J C~ClNO-CC"'CCIl-CIlCC')CIlCll.-
~C~~O~M~.MN~~~m.~o~
---.-- - ~C
I ."."."."."."."."."."."."."."."
~~~~~---------------
C.....~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~ I i!i!i!i!
!..:..:. ~llLl.llL.lLl. ll" "" " " """I
i~~~~.~ WllllllWli~~~R
--~- ~~~~~~~uu
~~rJil!! !!!!!!!~
."."."."." ."
___-<\1.,,_
rftrft~~.~
:e:c
IIQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~~~~~ ~~~~eQ~
_i ccccc ccccc c
c: '5) . C-N~."'fI)""CCIlC-NM.."a:>""Cl ..
:; : i -NM.."a:>....CCIl----------NNNNNNNNN 11:
'C Ii irrrr rrrrrr rrrrrr rrrr rrrrrr rrrrrrrrrra: a: a:a:a:a:rrrra:a: .z:
.~ Q. i I OJ j
a:
(61
~~
'C
.0 or) __N -NC').~C""
Q). ." N NM..,,' , . , . . .
00':' ,':' , , " I/H/)lfJlfJ
~ i >lLQ.lfJlfJlLlLlLlLlL~OOOO~~
c:
o
z
I,! I~
ml~
JI I J ~
1I11t1~
J! olI I r.....~
I ~DI ~
.a
CI)
C')
....
CIoI
CIoIIIl
C'S:a
III
CIoI
CO;
It)
CI)
'ii
~
-
Co)
lD
~
~
j:l
~
Ilil
Cl
Ilil
..:I
i
E..,!
~~
.-\~l[
11i~
.
-
"
u
'"
.
~
oa
"
..
III
..
-
...
a
o
u
.
IlIl
oa
j
"'.r::!
00
,c_
.a...
III-
_u
"0
~-
.~
..
~~
LIJ~ lij
~zl~
~LlJ5
L- LIJ I.~
r= Q:: <
~(D
~
"
..
-
rID
-oM
r::! a
-.
-:...
-
M'"
Ilil"
..
.
.
'.i/I
,,{/
r:: r\
\!'~:k-~l .... j i- ~
"'" _ ~..;:1l'-:
....... ..... .....~~ -:,./' ,. '. ~-_...
.JI ~ ""''' ....,~/ , I ~...---.......
.. .... \~\,~I" '-- /' ( lle-a 1\"'----" _-'Y.
~.....f'" \ - ---'y:~~"" ~ -'\
~ \ - /^>,~~r;{f'\~a~"~-.\ ": ~i~
\C'~\\\~J i{:".~0flr:\);;~~q \\~- - - J _I
,~ ~ \ ~ '7~" ~. l:;j"""- --'S
~ _~? /~ 'I \ \\ ... / ... 1-
, -. ~~~ 'irc::.-(\"'~ 11.:'"'1
\. ~(1( - j,J - \\\ \ ~\~-/<\~1
\ "",V - ~~ ~J - \ "'1 \ \ :: \\~. ..~, \\J. _ -:::;, =;;~
\ If.... I \ \\ c-. ~,;::::::::--~,~ ......
.\ ~~-- -- ~~ I~
..'\;/ : \ ~(~~-~~~~'./,I
.:: RESIOENT1AL ...J~ .I)) I III ~1Y /~'l//) ~~ ...
,r'7 -'/l+;..- 1// l.........-?' / I V ./ WO-' ~
----....-I~ ~<"_ 'II I ..............If.... /-/ -"'-"-.J /.:::{ \--, )~.
-. / I ,....... .1':1', "',......,. r ~ -"""'-:::/Wl
., '- - I a.rcl I L- ~ I Ua h ""I{", '-"'....~ I I ''''')1'' ~. ....Ie \
............F~-.,E*Irlct Hiri"/SChOOll~ ,~/ 1 I / '--.JI """''\.
.............~-.aIIa1aI I _ \,-",\ .... I L...1 II - --..I" \ \
____~L..U....-1O~ : I!I \ \\--..:........-J II .-/ I
"'I~"I \1..--''- _ _~ r-_ \
., ........ CanDIDl - a CIIa1cl I ~ -1 r::::r-.......... (' - ~ ~ ....
,. i "~-'10lM1cl ...,,' '" 1....Iry;-~h~.;t\ ...................../~
....... ~ - Z2 CIIa1cl I r:::y' J 1---11 , r -r,,!\,, \\ ^ ,~ ...,
All .......",., - JI DIMnct 1 R ~"/;;; \\ \ I ~..., , \.4"'~ / -J 1 \
...... - ., .........., - ... 0lM1cl : ~"'.J.. \ \\ \ ~ ",...<"\ ~,~tO~ ~.." , ( .... I
VIJ..AGE CENTER lib I c-.- ~~'", l_.~ \y.::--~ \ \ 'I <,~~v: ';.....\., J
/: ,flIC-1';:\ ~v""""-- \ '\ I ...." -m< ........."::::::-,
~-' w..-c.--.... .. -~ ~ 'I, I \ '"
YC-Z w..- c.... - ... rJ k -, I " ~..., \ \ I I ,,~/fL \..., \\
YC-S ....c--.... V ~ : ~~ \..)~/ //\\.....~'-~
""".."')j::;,~~4'\
8JSIPESS CENTER " 1~-r - ::. ~ ~ \h
~' --- c.- - ~'""" ~ 0lM1cl ~,- ~A"
~z ___ c.... - ........",..... ..... DIU1ct :>~..;,;;d'
I'U ..-:00--'
.,- .,;;;;;;-"'--
;,....-:;::'"
--
'il
Land Use
Districts
~4..dOI)ted
=:::::
,'/
SPECIAL Pl.JFOSE
'-' .... - , a.tct
0.- .... - I DIIiIrIet
0.- .... - I o.tat
0.- .... - 4 E*Irlct
0.- .... - . DIIIItcI
0.- .... - . DIIIItcI
0.. .... - f DIIIItcI
.... UIWl DIIIItcI
LBGBND
.I'
),,':!!":',i;...:~;':..':ii::,,( propoled laael .... chaa...
EXHIBIT E
/
-..---
-..--.
-..--
=-_-;~ 110O & 1101
m Ci1ti .
U'-.-
Jot.... ~
~E4STLAKE
A PLNHD ~ IV EASTLAICE DEV'BOPMM co.
/ ~,-' - ,~' Ii
F= yhihit A
r;:f \ ,~
~!'~~1 - ji~
J'.. ....::::, .. -:;-'/ifl.........-V
/~ '" ~..;-/-/ II~=:':="':':
'; ..' l-~'~'" '-/ ( ..... ..--
\~_~ \ ... ~'y:~~'" II
:\\\ ... /'~>~ld.~fl..(J., ~~ '9 ': ~1/~
-", \ 'If/' -~ II '/~ _tI \,~_ ...
~ _ ~,1?~~~~J \ \~ -- sJ.' -Il....j
\ I .., ~tlIZ -: I.~.b\ ~J("'~~ 11-
~, ~(;:f ~'1r::T-~\\~\~-~i\~1 ..,
\ -'IV - ~.:::::: ~J - \_.\\ -, \\~, ~'\\I_-::;.=;;:-
\ /'l -. I \ - \\ _. ~.;::::::--~,~ ......~
\ / J ~?~--- --, ,~ I
~):/ : \ ~(~r?/-'~-~ ~'../,I
- 1\ ~ I / "- ~ "-'1 '> ~ ('
-- ~~ 1\) / Y-iV /~/ 7'~,.,
AESIDENT1AL :""/~ I - " b I l~ I, I ~ .,,/ ~
I ~ ,/ r.-r ,........ k~ I) ./ \ -. )
...........-IClIIMlI ~~~ 'II / .........../f /;( -/-H' I / ~ \.-"'y;.~'
R--. - I' / I ,...:::::./1 \,..../ , ~ --II
4IloI - -I ~ ~ ""II... '-........ I '_'1 7 -.....:.-::.- \
_.......,.-7Di1lrll:1 : ."U.k~l ',-//) J I '-J/ --,~
----......c..--.DiMat 'll11~C\\~..\\ ~, I LJ II - ~" \
....... ~ - 10 DiMat · I I I II --"" !
-'~'1' ;1 \ L_..J~ ~.....-J -....-::i, r - \
........... ,..... ~ - D IlIIn:I I ~-,r ~ -',- (' -~ ~ -
~1I'UIllill~.-11~ ." I--"I~~.....::::~""'"'"\ " ,~'I
... \. jL--.JI' I ~-r, ......,\, _ '-...i
......... ~ - 22 DIIIn;t 1 f\. -:x- I I' I r -:\" \ / . ' ..,
4IloI ~...., - 16 DIIIrtet n \:, jI - \\ \ I .., l "', \ :\ / '-J I \
n -'1' ~r\\ \ \---->", " '
A11I' ............, - .. ClIMI1ct : r----JYC4) \\ \ _ .......\', \'". ,,"". I ( - I
VLLAGE CENTeR II -. '~'\~-'~ ~ \ \ 'I ~. \..~ .;.....,\. )
~ III ,r-x ~,,/ 1 \\ I - '\ I.~( ,~,
vc, ....CenIwr ... ... - ~' I I J. \ ~
VC:2 .... CenIwr:", ....J k ---: I / &.'" \ \ I J .....-'l. 7/ ~\\.., \\
V ~ Ycos.. ~ Vi....L....-'" / ~...../\ -.. \\
YC-I .... c... - ... ... /' ~ /' // \ ) '-
:'(............~~~.-9?\
ElJSINESS CENTER 'I.'. "~ - =- ~ ~ \h
I ::: 1:::::= :== =- "':.. ~~ ....~q "
.. --~--
SPECIAL PlFFOSE _~
=-
Land Use
Districts
Pro flosed
::::::
'-" .... . 1 DIIIrtet
QMn .... - I DIII1ct
a.o .... - I DIII1ct
a.o .... - 4 DIII1ct
QIen .... - . DIII1ct
a.o .... - . ClIMI1ct
QIen .... - 7 ......
~ 1 ..... Ul'tlM DIIIrtet
LEGEND
}............ :///.
":'::::'::?:: :.....:.:.
;:. ".::.:::::::::t::::{::::)::/:::
!iliJ1.f propoled laDd_ .... chaDI.'
EXHIBIT F
~E4STLAKE
A fIlAN<E) COM\t.NTY IV EASTlAICE CEVEl.OfltIiNT co.
'; I
-;
___~___t
-..--
==-_~~... a no1
m Ci1ti .
U & oW:xaIs
701.... ~
I/IOft5
F= vhihit A
ATTACHMENT 4
EIR-86-04 ADDENDUM
~J _/j
1 .-<
SECOND ADDENDUM TO ENVffiONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FSEffi 86-04 (B)
PROJECT NAME: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
PROJECT WCATION: Various parcels within the EastLake Greens SPA between Hunte
Parkway and the future SR-125 Row north of the future E. Orange
Ave.
I. INTRODUCTION
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental
Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or
Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present:
1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion
of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration that have not created any new
significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or
Negative Declaration; or
2. Changes in circumstances, additional or refined information available since
completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential
environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives
available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show
that the project will have or more significant impacts which were not previously
addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration.
3. The changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise new issues about the
significant effects on the environment.
II. PROPOSED PROJECT REVISIONS
The Amendments proposed can be grouped in the following general categories:
I. Park Relocations
2. Density Transfers and Parcel Boundary Adjustments
3. Removal of Interim Designation on Parcel R-26
I. Park Relocations
The Neighborhood Park (parcel P-3) in the adopted plan was partially within the
SDG&E easement and contained less than ten acres of net useable acres for park
use. The park is proposed by this amendment to be relocated southeasterly of
./ /"")
/ ,/
// //
""'j#;
,.- " ~/
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
2
Parcel R-20 and to contain 10.0 acres net useable for park uses (11.8 acres
gross). This relocation deletes former residential Parcel R-21. The former
location of the park is proposed to be converted to Public/Quasi-Public as an
expansion of existing Parcel PQ-2. This additional 11.0 acres will be available
for Community Purpose Facilities.
A second park relocation involves Parcel P-5, which was a Private Neighborhood
Park between Parcels R-20 and R-21. This park is proposed to be relocated near
the intersection of South Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway adjacent to Parcel
R-12. No significant change in acreage is proposed.
2. Density Transfers and Boundary Adjustments
Reductions in densities are proposed in eleven residential parcels. Increases in
densities are proposed in four residential parcels. The net result of these density
transfers is a 133 unit decrease in the overall residential density. Most of the
density transfers are minor adjustments that reflect units achieved in the tract map
and design review process. The following parcels are proposed to be changed in
a more substantive way (more than 10 du):
Parcel
Proposed Chan~e
R-6
R-16
R-20
R-21
R-23
R-26
-12
+26
-37
-120
-142
+ 200 (The Adopted Plan provided this
parcel with an interim density.)
Boundary adjustments occur primarily as a result of Park relocations and are
proposed to be reflected in the amended Tentative Tract Map. These adjustments
result in a net loss of 11.8 acres of residential land. An increase of 11.0 acres
has been added as Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) and the remaining 0.8 acres has been
added as Park.
The following shows the existing and proposed changes in land use and acreage
on the General Development Plan.
,/ ' , ? //
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
3
Existing Proposed
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres du/ac Units Land Use Acres dulac Units
I~ 250.5 ~ 743 I~ 250.5 ~ 743
LM LowlMedlum 389.6 o.e 2008 LM LowIMedlum 381.0 o.e 1803
M Medium 242.2 ~11. 1Q75 M Medium 251.1 1-11. 2023
MH MediumlHigh 125." 11-18. 1684 MH MediumlHigh 100.0 11-18. 1348
H High 11.0 18-27+ 250 H High 2".3 18-27+ 510
S~ Total 1018.7 6660 S~TClIaI 1006.Q 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres LInd Use Acres
Rltail 51.& Retail 51.&
Prof. & Admin. 6.8 Prof. & Admin. 8.8
Res. & Ud. Mfgr. 135.Q Res. & Ud. Mfgr. 135.;
Open Space 187.6 Open Space 187.6
Public/Quasi-Pub. 137.9 PubIicIQuasl-Pub. 148.;
Par1<s & RIC. 295." Parka & RIC. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7 Major Circulation 214.7
SuI>- Total 1030.2 SuI>- Total 1042.0
[[:]Future Urban 72.9 ~Future Urban 72.9
Project Totals 2121.8 6660 I Project Totals 2121.8 6527
3. Removal of Interim Designation for Parcel R-26
Parcel R-26 was given an Interim Designation on the Adopted SPA Plan. This
designation indicated that the density of 4.5 du/ac would be subject to future
amendment to reflect the Chula Vista General Plan. The Interim Designation was
assigned to allow an Affordable Housing Program for all of Eastlake to be
developed. This program has proceeded and has designated this parcel as a site
to implement a portion of the Chula Vista Housing Element requirement for
Affordable Housing. The inc~se in density is proposed to allow this program
to be implemented.
/J"
--,
General
Development
Plan
.L.\dOfJted
RESIDENTIAL
IAAX.
L.N<<) USE ACRES CUI AC I.HTS
CCJ~ 250.5 l>-3 743 LM
~ ~/-'" 38lI.6 3-fl 2OOl!
a3~ 242.2 &-11 1175 PO
~~ 1254 11-18 1184
~ Hltl 11.0 1&-27. 250
&ib- T 0IaI 1018.7 8660
f'O\l-RESlDENTlAL L
LN() USE ACRES
CQ~ 51.8
~ P,....-..1II1 11.11
~.-
~ =~.~ 136.8
~ 0.- bee IIlH
~ Pldc/lM~ 137.8
CO ,,-,<, & ~ 2854
~ ....JllI' c..c.allon 2147
8Ib-TCIl.Il 10302
~ FuIIn ~ 72.8
flI'llIICt T CIl.Il 2121.1 ae 8160 cIu
. co......... Cfturcf\ ....
1Il1._~__'ID___--
tel .. --.. ..." .. c:::bIII Va&a GeNral ~
.41 EASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY BV EASTL.AKE OE\'E1.OPt/iNT CO.
~inti ~
Land Pllnni~ L ~
r-~_D' i_._
//",
/J /'
--) f::.:.7
Exhibit 1
.
General
Development
Plan
PrOIJOsed
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres dulse Units
I Low
LM LowlMedium
M Medium
MH MediumIHigh
H High
Sub- Total
250.5 ~ 743
381.0 ().6 19Q3
251.1 6-11. 2023
100.0 11-18. 1348
24.3 1S-27+ 510
1006.9 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
Retail 51.9
Prof. & Admin. 6.8
Res. & Ltd. Mfgr. 135.9
Open Space 187.6
PubUclQuasi-Pub. 1<CS.9
Plrks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub-Total 1042.0
[E[:JFuture Urban 72.9
Project Totals 2121.8
PO
*
6527
. -... CUeto ....
1ID1'-~--._----
. .. .--.. .. _ c::a.. "... o.MraI "-"
~ E"ASTLAKE.
A PLANNED ~ITY BY EASTLAKE ~ CO.
~inti ~
Land 'Ionn'na l J
_'-c......a!,. ~ ~
r'I....._.._
1/10185
// ~:J
/; / ,:1
/0 /
Exhibit 1
Z_.. ~
'-' II 'a
< ,"I jl · .CCl>.ltllDCCOItlCO...MNCOItlM....lDCOC-.COlDC.C _
~I Itl.CCClDCOCl>..lDCl>.lDCOlD-lDltl.N._....CO.CO ...
.",1 -...... C\I'" N ----N ~
..J ......',
-11I1
a.. .:'
""111
I..,,'
~II
Z....::.1..1
o
ti
N
-
..J
-
~
::>
i
IJ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i
NN~..~~~~~ecc~~~~e~m~~~~~..o ~
tIi
III
Ii Ii
N
cw)
ltl
II)
I ......lDCC.....Itl.lDMCO.COItl...Cl>Cl>...OlDlDO.MCl>- -
~~~:~~g!C~~~~=;g~~~~eg~~~~mc ~
.
I
COllDNO-OOItlOCl>-Cl>lDCOlCl>Cl>.-
.N..O~~~.~N~~~tIi.~i'~
__ .-_ ... ,...c
f! Illlll
~U!flmiiiiJjill
-ltJ~iiif!!!!!!!~
Itlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltl Itl
~~~~~---------------------~-
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
:~
11QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~eeeeegeegQQg
1 cccccccccc c
ca !i
;; J ·
C .O-NM.ltllD...lDCl>C-NM.ltllD...lD
~ I ;:t~~~:~:~;;;;;;;;;;:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:t.!
.~l j I OJ .
a::
"
/; ~/
"""'; ,
~ -'
.a
E~ I ~
~ I ~
'~I ~:.~ J
fl.~ i L
\Jjj
....
....
II)
N
. III
cw)i
I, I
I) f
!ll
I~ t
Jt !
fS
~: f i
w~ J;j
~Z~
LLlU
~c
lilt.!)
~
~
2""""'" ~
~ :~ 1: ~il~~~I~::D=:~!:~:g! ~~::.-!!i;; ~
......... ~:!.I1 ~... N.....W .... .. ~
--' .:::'
a.. ......', u
.......'1 ·
':::1 }i ~~~~~~~""~~"":.,~~C!"""'C!~ G!~~G!"'''~ i
1 & NN....""""""!'-~.!'-lf)O!'-Ift-!'-. -ft..... .
Z~; - - - - .-
o
-
G:
N
-
...J
-
I-
::>
I !'-!'-ClOO. !'-1ft1lMll fIIN .........",
i =:~:~~g~e~~~::g~~~
i
.......,-."N- &II)
:2lri";~at'- ~
.
J ~"~~C!"":C!~"'C!G!"":G!~ftG!G!~"":
.NIft.Olftft-.ftN--!'-...IftO!'-
............. .. ~G
~~ Jl~llllll....... I
aali~i lUIIJJ~o
~~lIU . !!!!M!!~2
w
..
J
i
----r-
i.' !
, , '
'.
.:'
~f ~I
~
CID
C')
,..
C\I
E~ I!
~ 1
._\ f!~
C .e6
\).. .il
....
!l
C\li
co)i
I
I,! I
II i I
.j I I
I~ J t
ti J
III ~ II
I:tn
~ 0 I
Ii
C\I
co)
It')
CID
ii
;e
u
CD
"l
UJ~ J;j
~zI~
SUJg
L- UJ I~
r=~c
Ul(D
~
~
r;:: r~ ..:1 ~
~!',,~ t .... Ji:v
"",, . ~'Af'.....:
. ""~. ~-/ I' '. ~-_....
...-, """ '...,;././ I -.aor-___
\r--~'r--... C"~~"~I)'"( ( llC-n 11r----..---.
\ \ '-~ ---- \ ~ 'y/~."" \\,,~ '"\
:\\ --, /^>-~:J-j... If'\~~0.''~- ': ~i~
\t. \ (/,'/ - ~- - tit- ~ _a ~--'
,:'\~ \..;/ t1-,\:::'-1VjI 4'~~ \(\ - J -.
~ _ \.,1",,'?>~r:~}.J \ \~ - iF -ll":1
\ I -, ~a/.Z -: I.~JJ \~-'t\~~ h-
I (;:t' ::::'U)~\\~\\,./<;::='\~1
, . ~ ~ l_ \ \ \'-.,;... )\ \ 1 ...
\ -.,(/ - ,,~ .;"J \-\\:: \\~. .'....\J.~~ -~, /I
\ If -. I \ \\ we-' ~;;- - ~~ .\
.;:::;-~- -... ~:\. /\.>
-rS"';'/ : \ ~~1it1?//'-~ -'~~~~~'
"- 1\ ii?/' I' - ~ '-') ) 'Y.
-- RESIDENTIAL _..-t".~ _ ,1) ( ~iY /' // //":. ...
rz/"b~' ,b I k~ / IY;L _. ~
--.......-SIlllMrl ~:fTll r-...............It'... ~~ -,.-"--.-1 / '\( \-... )~,
-, / I r-...... /' , '" r-"I, ~ -"'V::/Wl
,..,.., -- - S I*lI1CI 111/ __,01L..., ,-,,-,-' I I /lIC-tI II'" _~ .J r \
,..,.., .... 'MIr - , DlIftt · \1 I r-"ll ,-/"1 J I '--J / - - ~';..,
--.........,o...e-.a.tII ill... \\_..,1;;, Il) II - ~'I \
....... Q,...4Jl.., - 10 DIIIrlaI : I!I \ l~......-J II .-/
-'~"I L_ -''- ... -~ r- ... \
----.r"..... ConooIIt - D DIIiWlcl j ,. -,r~.......... ('... ~ ~ ....
- ,. "~-1'CIId1ct _.,'" 11lC-'.Iry;-~h~..;)\ _ .................../~
I f \. -- / L--.l1 I /,..... - f'"', ...... , , ~ -,
,..,..,c......__-Z2ll11lrlc:1 H '<X/'- 1\\ I, I .., ( ..;\, \ ,,~'\' //,--1" \
"Ill ~I ~. """'MIr - II DIarlcl " " I ~ ' ...- .. , ---.
-.." r' ," "., '
",~..........,-..DIn1ct :r--::it 1'\\ \ \ /' \ \\!~,~,10'\\. IIC-tI I( .... I
VI.L.AGE CENTER 'I _.- ,~, (IIC-'~ \~ _1 \ \ \ <, \~v-: ';.,....~
I....' 1-.... - - Iii.. "'- ' ,...." , ~-------! \ I I - ) '-g. ~ "" J
YO-2 w.eo ConI., - .. ~ h --, I ", ~.., \ \ I I ,,~J! \ \.., \\
___ ___ "- _ __ V ~ ~ \. 'l\..L/ / // ',_.a \\ ..d.
....--. ~- - -. \ k//;/ , }\.,..
"',_to ~....L=-.!l"'//,
" "~=r=~ ~ \\
" ~ __ ~., /:.\1"7
~~~,(I 4P~-...(
" ";'d'
....... ........ =--:;fooo"'"
---:;..-"
--
Land Use
Districts
i\dol)ted
:::::::
.-;....-
EIUSItESS CENTER
I K-1 : ....-. c... - .......... .... DIn1ct
K-2 ..... Contor - ........... .... DIarlcl
SPECIAL P\R'OSE
'-' ..... - 1 .....
c.n ..... - I DIoIotI:l
c.n ..... - I DIoMat
o.n ..... - . DIoIrIcl
c.n ..... - . DIoIrIcl
c.n .... - . .....
c.n .... - , .....
..... ~ DIoIrIcl
"',
I
. [.,1
"'>;- / /
-..-...
-..--.
-..--
""'i.iofI~ ~~ ... a D01
m Q1ti .
~ &.wx.s
7...... ~
Exhibit A
~fASTLAKE
A FlNHD eot.MHTY f( EASn.AICE ClEVEl.OPtt9IT CO
r;:' t \ ' ;1
~!'''~~I - ji~
~" . -:;:-..:::if'......--v
" ",,~I ':../ j '. ~__....
,.,- ~ " '" '''''': /' , l~"""""'" -
, \__ G!;:.:. '_I" ....... / ( ~n ,.---- .. _-.
, ... ......"-.../ \', " II
'\~.....("".. --I -....., 1/....""
\ ~ -..... \,.......-, J y/--."" 'V::-=; ""\
"\\ "I I'^>.k:::w ... '(1\'"""""'\\-" ,- ?~
\(,. \ f /,/ -~ ~/t;... \ _.~ \~_ ::.; /
. .' I~"\\./ if.., \::'-1VJ #-;;'~\1 \ '\ 1M J ~I
! _''-r1",,;>~l::l.J ~ - T -ir:J
, .., ~tfZ -.: /,~ \r~"/("'~~ II.:;
(;:r 'J \...Ir"~-\ \ ~""<;:::'\~1
-. ,V,y, - ~~ - ",,j' - \ _I' \ -. \\"? )\c..\\ 1_ -::;, =;;;:.....
\ If _. I \ \ \ - \\ ~I ~,;::::::--~~~ ""~
\ \ ~p~_- --..... ,~ I
-\-'/ ..> (~ "./ ........~ 0.4" ~ '../,'
:~ i \ \ ,0 -~~Illl?/ ~ ~ '-J ')'~ s.....
RESIDENllAL -~ 'P(... / hI (/ 7 ~~./ ..// / '-:::;:.
~ ,/~L -.... 'I I ~ I I ~ '/;t -. """
--- .... - a IIIII'laI L.... ~. f'll / ..........j (.I~ - .I'--L~! / '\\ ~-"'Jr) ~I
_. / / ,.. ~ ..1"\ ..I,......" ~ /Vl
~I-.-a~ Ill! ..../1..., '-..../'...... I I ,~"),,,,, _~a r- \
........ ..... ,,~ - 7 o.nct : \/ I r----; I ,0.4/'" I / I \.....J / ""'~
I, I II '-" I f I I 'I.
---- ....... CInIIIIl- IIMlaI _ \\_tI .., ~..1 I - ~ " \
........ ~ - 10 ClIIMct : 1:1 \\-:-...... ' II .-/-J
-I~'I \ L_-''-~ .......J 0.4 "'-:"'1\ r- _ \
~ "-*l CanDIlpt - D ClIIlrict j ...-,r ~ -, (' ----.l! ~___ ...
-.-.. ~ _ 11 DlMIi'Icl ... I " IIIC-"I~ ~....-;;~..;) , ............'""'/~
......... ConllaIIwUol- 22 CIIIilrtc:t 1. f:; -. / f-11 I r - r' -. , \ 7' ~ -,
~ llUH'~ - 21 C*Irlct ~, JI.... \\ \ l .., l ..;\ \.....~~ / "--J! \
....... "-14"'" ....-f'~ - .. DIn'Ic1 : H -""t'7f-- f\ \ \ \~" ~' ~ .... ,(' ... 1
II (--- VC-3) \ .... ... \ , \ " . ~ .
, I ~.~ .;;::-- --, \ \ \ ',,,~ '\. -;....""
F' I ~-- Iii ~I I ~~, \ ~o./"""""'----\ II \ 1- '" '-77 ,~, J
.... '_ -- - i.&i.. ~' I, J /7,,,0....... ~'"'
'te-I ~ c:..... - ... ~ h --., I "..- ~.., \ \ I J ..-'l I'~ \.., \ \
YC-3 .... c... _ .. V <'<~ V OS-4 ~ 'J\...L/ / /1/\-" \\ .
... / ~ ./ h"/ \ J '-
~,"s-s ~-LRC-~::I"?\\
, , I _ A".. 1:.\ I'J
";.I' AI}'"
-'" { ~A
~<',"I --A'd'
P\J..._~-
--~~
--
Land Use
Districts
. Pro I)Osed
::::::::
EIJSINESS CENTER
I ~, : ---- c.ne.. - ~ ~ I*Irtct
lie-I ..... c.ne.. - ........... .... DIatnct
SPECIAL PlfFOSE
Olt-, ~ .... - 1 a.tcl
o..n .... - I DIMrII:t
o..n .... - a DIMrII:t
o..n .... - . DIMrII:t
o..n .... - . a.tcl
a.- .... - 1 DIMrII:t
a.- .... - 7 a.tcl
,... ~ DIMrII:t
~ E'ASTLAKE
A fIlNHD c:o.94NTY IV EASl1.AICE DE'VElOPMNT co.
-..--..
-..--,
-..--
=-iOfl~~"'. aM,
m Ci1ti .
~ &.wx.s
7-1.... ~
l"Oft5
""--j <
Exhibit A
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
ID. CHANGES IN IMPACT ANALYSIS
4
The project site has be graded for sometime and this minor shift in land uses and minor
modifications to densities will not result in any change in the natural environment. the
provision of public facilities was programmed in the original EastLake GDP/SPA at a
specific density. The minor reduction and density shifts that part of this proposal would
not significantly impact the provision of these services. the minor reduction in
population would result in a commensuration reduction in related impacts.
IV. CONCLUSION
"
Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above
discussion, 1 hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in
only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the previously
sited FEIR adequate under CEQA.
V. REFERENCES
EIR-96-04 EastLake Greens
EIR-96-04 (A) Addendum
IS-96-04 EastLake Greens GP A/SP A Modification
General Plan, City of Chula Vista
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures
~; -f/;;'
t:> ...~-
. \. _-, r..-:-..._"
. ", I ~ 1'--
-, '- ,- r-
'...-. .
... 1}rnir'n/rn to COll1l11lillily ~rili(,(
OCTO
4 799~
D ~
(L; '~'.
VIA FAX "1-5171
, o.s. Mail
10595 JAMACHA BOULEVARD, SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91977
TELEPHONE 670-2222, AREA CODE 619
1995
Mr. Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912-1087
Re: Proposed Amendment to the Adopted EastLake II General
Development Plan (GDP), Related to the EastLake Greens
and an Amendment to the SPA Plan, and the Tentative Tract
Map (IS-"-OS).
Dear Mr. Reid:
The Otay Water District (OWD) would like to have ample opportu-
nity to review and respond to any environmental documentation
(Negative Declaration or EIR) relating to the above referenced
project.
OWD may have site needs for the future 711-3 reservoir and other
water facilities as well, thus requiring the site(s) and pipeline
routes to be called out on any adopted EastLake II General
Development Plan (GDP).
Please contact me at 670-2293 or John Garcia at 670-2213 if you
need any information or have any questions with regard to water
facilities or service. We look forward to reviewing and res-
ponding to your completed environmental Initial study/Negative
Declaration or Draft EIR.
Sincerely,
~ f)7c/d
Michael F. c~eman, AICP
Environmental Specialist
~
.
MFC:cp
cc: Tim Stanton
Jim Peasley
John Garcia
Chris Craven
Rebecca Patton
/~,
,"
/ /i~
'i'_:~
Sweetwater Union High School District
Administration Center
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91 911-2896
(619) 691-5500
-. -
Division of Pl3nninz ~nd F~cllit/es
Ms. Barbara Reid
City of Chula Vista
Planning Departm(l'nt
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Reid:
Re: Proposed Eastlake General Development Plan Changes
The Sweetwater Union High School District does not object to the proposed
amendments to the EastLake II General Development Plan. Community Facilities
District No. 1 (CFD No.1) was established to mitigate this project's Impacts to
schools. However, thank you for the notification, It Is good that the district Is kept
Informed of these changes.
Thomas Sliva
Director of Planning
TS/ml
:}
A'ITACHMENT 5
nISCLOSURE STATEMENT
/ //-",
I /,7--)
1el/17/1995 el9:16
6196915171
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PAGE el4
nIB CITY OF CH\.1LA VISTA DlSa.05URE STA1"BMan'
~, 'Ire required to file I Statement of Di~losure of certain owne~hip or nnandal Inleresls, paymenu, or campal&n
lhutlon&, on all millers which wUl require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Plannina Commission. and
au other officta' bodies. The following Informalion must be disclO$ed:
1. List the names of all pcr$ons having a nnanclallnterest In the property which 1I the lubJect of the .ppllCltlon or the
conlract, Col., owner, IppllClnt, contractor, lubcontractor, materill supplier. I
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
. 2. tr any person. Idenllfied punuant to (1) above ila corporation or partnership. lilt the names of aU tncSMduala owning
more than 10% of the shares In the corporation or ownlna any partnership Intereat In the partnership.
BOSWELL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
THE TULAGO COMPANY
3. If any person' Identified pursuant to (I) above is non.pront orglnlZltlon or a trull, list the namel of any penon
&ervtn! as director of the non.pront organization or as trustee or benetlcl.ry or trustor of the crust.
N/A
-"-
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with Iny member of the City Itlcr, Boards. COmmis&lol\S.
Committees, and Council within the put twelve months? Yes_ No..!!,. Ie yes, please Indicate penon(s):
5. Plwe identify each and every person, Including any Ilents. employees, consultants. or independent CODtrlctDI"5 wbo
you have &onlgne.d to represent you bdorc the Cily In this mauer.
Garv Cinti. Cinti Land PlanninR
Gail Crocenzi, EastLake Development Co.
R02er Bhatia. Rick En2ineerinR
-
Bill Ostrem. EastLake Develo~ent Co.
6. Hive you and/or your ornc:e11 or .genu. In the aure.atc, contributed more thin $1,000 to a Counellmember In the
current or precedln& elcctlon period? YCIII_ No_ If yea, Itatc which Coundlmember(I):
· · · (NOTE: Atta IddltJoDaJ ..as ·
Date: I D.- I 8' - 9 c;-
r.~il Crn~~n~i. ARRi8t~nt Proiect Mana2er
Print or type Dime of contrlctor/lppUcant
, ~. Mft1tH tit: ~'" INIivl"o~ fin"' e".ponttmh/p, joint~. ..od";M JOtMJ daI.,""'" "'JfIIflzw-,~ .... ..... ,......" "..."C*,
Mil .11I M! 0fIvr CCIUIUY. eJty _Ill COWUI)'. rity 'NUliclpdlity, dblrtCI, tw OIhtl' ,<<Iticdl ..willltlorl. (Jf "" oeM ,., fit ~ ... · · WtIL ·
/1 //'
-/
ATTACHMENT 2
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AND
ORDINANCE
/ ..;. ,/
RESOLUTION
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VIST A APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA), PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN,
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING
PLAN.
1.
RECIT ALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which the subject matter of this resolution are
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A and B attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, identified as the EastLake General
Development Plan and EastLake Greens SPA Plan Area, ("Project Site");
and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29, 1995, the EastLake Development
Company ("Developer") filed applications for an amendment to: 1) the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan (known
as Document No. _ on file with the office of the City Clerk), 2) the
EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan (known as Document No.
_ 0 file with the office of the City Clerk), 3) the EastLake Greens Air
Quality Improvement Plan (known as Document No. _ on file with the
office of the City Clerk), 4) the EastLake Greens Water Conservation
Plan (known as Document No. _ on file with the office of the City
Clerk), and 5) Public Facilities Financing Plan (EastLake Greens Public
Facilities Financing Plan) ("Project"); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject
matter of 1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan,
previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199; (SPA), all
approved on July 18, 1989; and, 4) an Air Quality Improvement Plan
(EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan) and 5) a Water
Conservation Plan (EastLake Greens and Water Conservation Plan) and
Public Facilities Financing Plan (Eastlake Greens Public Facilities
Financing Plan), all previously approved by the City Council 0
/<.~/ ~;/.. '~
November 24, 1992, by Resolution No. 16898; and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing
on said project on November 29, 1995, and voted to recommend th~t the
City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to
the conditions listed below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 12, 1995, on the
Discretionary Approval Applications, and to received the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
F. WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this Resolution
was approved December 12, 1995, the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista approved for first reading Ordinance No. amending the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District
Regulations Land Use District Map.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
find, determine and resolve as follows:
II.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission
at their public hearing on this project held on November 29, 1995, and the
minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the
record of this proceeding.
III.
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new
supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum the FSEIR-86-04
(B), EastLake Greens, which must be consider by the City Council prior to a
decision on this project.
IV.
INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby finds that the addendum to EIR-86-04 has been
prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures
of the City of Chula Vista.
'./,~
v.
GDP FINDINGS
A. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPl\1ENT AS DESCRIBED BY THE
GENERAL DEVELOPl\1ENT PLAN IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development
Plan reflects land use distribution and densities, and circulation system
that are consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan Land Use, and
Housing Elements.
B. A PLANNED COMMUNITY DEVELOPl\1ENT CAN BE INITIATED
BY ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIFIC USES OR SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA PLANS WITHIN TWO YEARS OF THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE.
A SPA Plan has already been approved for the development of the
planned community and amendments thereto conforming to the amended
GDP are included in the Project.
C. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT,
THA T SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL CONSTITUTE A
RESIDENTIAL ENVIRONJ\1ENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY
AND STABILITY; AND THAT IT WILL BE IN HARMONY WITH
OR PROVIDE COMPATIBLE V ARlETY TO THE CHARACTER OF
THE SURROUNDING AREA, AND THAT THE SITES PROPOSED
FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES, SUCH AS SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS
AND PARKS, ARE ADEQUATE TO SERVE THE ANTICIPATED
POPULA TION AND APPEAR ACCEPT ABLE TO THE PUBLIC
AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION THEREOF.
The residential densities and transfers reflected on the amended GDP are
compatible with the pattern and character of development approved with
the original GDP, and can be adequately served by the public facilities
incorporated therein.
VI.
SPA FINDINGS
A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN
CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I
EXP ANSI ON) GENERAL DEVELOPl\1ENT PLAN AND THE CHULA
VISTA GENERAL PLAN.
The amended EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan reflects land
use, circulation system, and public facilities that are consistent with the
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan and the
Chula Vista General Plan.
~/'::" --:; / /
B.
THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN
,
AS AMENDED WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY
SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOL VED
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA.
The SPA Plan, as amended allows, in the context of market demand a
more logical transition of construction within the EastLake Greens
Planned Community, consistent with the phasing of internal and external
infrastructure, and the amendments have been found to be consistent with
the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Public Facilities Financing Plan,
Air Quality Improvement Plan, and Water Conservation Plan.
C THE EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA)
PLAN AS AMENDED WILL NOT ADVERSEL Y AFFECT
ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT,
CIRCULATION, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY.
The land uses within the EastLake Greens SPA area represent the same
uses approved by the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan.
D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH
USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN
AREA, LOCATION, AND OVER-ALL DESIGN TOT HE PURPOSE
INTENDED; THA T THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR
INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUST AINED DESIRABILITY
AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE.
The amendments do not involve areas planned for industrial or research
uses.
E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL , RECREATIONAL, AND
OTHER SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH
DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION
AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND
THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FORM ANY
ADVERSE EFFECTS FORM SUCH DEVELOPMENT.
The relocation of the park parcels (Parcel P-3 and P-5) respond to final
master plan refinements intended to improve the Planned Community's
recreational facilities and add to the quality of living at EastLake.
/-; /)
F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE
SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED
TRAFFIC THEREON.
The amendments do not involve changes to the existing circulation
system.
G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
JUSTIFIED ECONOl\1ICALL Y AT THE LOCATION(S) PROPOSED
AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF
THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATIONS(S).
The amendments do not involve areas planned for commercial uses.
H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE
PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL
COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT.
The amendments are consistent with the previously approved plans and
regulations applicable to surrounding areas.
VII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice
of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
VIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term provision and
conditions herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms,
provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Bruce M. Boogaard
Director of Planning
City Attorney
M:\home\planning\luis\PCM-9607.RPT
/ ~ r ..;/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE
I EXPANSION) PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
(LAND USE DISTRICT MAP ONL Y) AND CONSIDERING AN
ADDENDUM TO EIR-86-04.
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the properties which are the subject matter of this ordinance are
diagrammatically represented on Exhibit F and G attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, and located within the EastLake II (EastLake I
Expansion) Planned Community Area of the City of Chula Vista ("Project
Site"); and
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on September 29,1995, the EastLake Development Company
("Developer") filed an application requesting amendments to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations (known as
Document No. _ on file with the office of the City Clerk) Land Use District
Map and Land Use District designations of certain areas within the EastLake
Greens Planned Community ("Project").
e. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the Project Site has been in part the subject matter of a Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No.
15199 ("EastLake Greens SPA Plan") and Planned Community (p.e.) District
Regulations previously approved by City Council Ordinance No. 2317 (EastLake
II-EastLake I Expansion -Planned Community District Regulations) on July 18,
1989.
D. Planning Commission Record on Applications
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on November 29, 995, and voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the Planned Community District Regulation Land Use Districts Plan
amendment in accordance with the fmdings listed below.
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission
at their public hearing on this Project held on November 29, 1995, and the
minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the
'-i
') /j .AI
record of this proceeding.
E. City Council Record on Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 12, 1995, on the Discretionary
Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning
Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and,
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution and Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council meeting at which this ordinance was
introduced for first reading (December 12, 1995), the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista approved Resolution No. _ by which it imposed amendments
and conditions on the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development
Plan, EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area SPA Plan, EastLake Greens Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan, and
EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine and ordain
as follows:
II.
CERTIFICATION OF COJ\1PLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new
supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an addendum to EIR-86-04,
EastLake Greens, which must be considered by the City Council prior to a
decision on the project.
III.
INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council does hereby find that the addendum to EIR-86-04 has been
prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental
Quality Act, the state EIR guidelines and the Environmental Review procedures
of the city of Chula Vista.
IV.
FINDINGS FOR P-C PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE AMENDMENTS
The City Council hereby finds that the proposed amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations Land Use
Districts Plan are consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and
public necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice
support the amendments.
/ -.. #} //
v.
NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice
of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
VI.
INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCA nON
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Ordinance is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and
condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms,
provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to
be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio.
VII.
EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and
after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Bruce M. Boogaard
Director of Planning City Attorney
. M:\hornc\planning'Juis Ipcm96-07. ord
_//""J /J, I
ATTACHMENT 3
EXHIBITS
-"" 'j ,
General
Development
Plan
~.\dOI)ted
I-R
RESIDENTIAL
LNCl USE ACAES tlUI AC
~Law 2liQ.5
~3
LJ,I Law'....... 3llll.5 ...
Efj~ 2422 e-"
~~ 1254 11-11
G=:J ~ 11.0 1e-27 .
Ilb-T_
10le.7
M \ 0 '0
J .el
.
.
I
.
.
MAX.
lHTS
743
2008
1175 PO
I....
250
1650
PO
.
1'01I- RESCENTlAl..
LNCl \.lIE ACRES
~ .... 51.ll
c-o I :t.=~ u
Hl ~&
~ UnIecl MIrU~ 135.11
~ =~ ~:;.:
~ ..... ,""'-' m.4
~ Map c.aallOn 2147
IlarTlllIlI 1030.2
~ F&an ~
~ T....
72.11
2121.1 ac
1610 au
. _.. C1w.. ....
Amendment Key
_ Areas beIng Amended
.).--~.......
-----
...--..---=-
~~1IJlKE
DEVELOPMENT co.
EXHIBIT B-1
~inti~
~.~~".! ~..4
~~
.. 1_._
l ~ ') ;/
F yhihit 1
""-, -t-",""
General
Development
PI all
PrOI)Osed
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use A
cres dulse Units
I low
lM LowlMedium
M Medium
MH Medium/High
H High
Sub- Total
250.5 0-3
381.0 0-6
251.1 6-11.
1153 11-18.
11.0 18-27+
1008.9
743
1903
2023
1606
250
6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
C Retail 51.9
C.O Prof. & Admin. 6.6
I-R Res. & lId Mfgr. 135.9
o Open Space 187.6
PO Public/Ouasi.Pub. 146.9
P Parks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub- T olal 1040 0
[[:JFulur. Urban n:9
ProjeetTotals 2121.8
6527
.--......
Amendment Key
_ Areas being Amended
.1.-_------
-..------=-
~ fASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTlAKE 0EVElC)Ptv'ENT co
EXHIBIT B-2
~inti~
~,~~~ ~ ~
~.~
I 1_.....
em.
r
. f
Z'-~ ~
... ::r'~ L .OCll.lI'llDOlDlI'llD....l'lNlDlI'll'l....lDlDO-.lDlDO.O _
~ J!~.coomc~..m~.lDCm_m~.N._.....C.C ....
.....tit ...... N" N........... c-.. =e
.-J QI~
CL ':1 III
'w i .......Ol'lC-O~l'l.Oll'll'lll'lOClllNlDCl'lO-l'lNU'lU'l~lD ~
z:;; " ..N~..~~~~~..."~"".~.:;~~O~..O :
o
-
G:
N
-
-J
-
~
::>
EJI C')
-
:s
~ 'T~ :E
~ 11\ ><
.... .... w
CD 1!t
N
.:3i
..liI U
co;~
liI i 1,1 ~
J lDl'llDNO-O~U')OClll~~lDl'lClllClll.- N
~~._g~~=.ftN~-~..~i~ co;
It) III ~
- CD
I! Jlllll -, J t:x::
~U~BUljliiUiJI III ~
-~lJ . . . " !!!!!!!I III S ~
J I.
_ .11
J ~ ~
III
.......lDOO......U'l.lDl'llD.OU'l...ClIIClII....OlDlDO.l'lClll- -
..~.~~OCC~..N~~O...~oo~~~~cc .
.....NNN...... .....N.......N ..-........ .. ~
.
U'lU'lU')U'lU'lU'lll'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU'lU')U'lU'l U')
~~~~~..-....................................-..........~..
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
:€
Ilccccccccccccccc~~~~~~~~ggcc~
cccccccccc c
'iii i
;: I ·
c'l . O-Nl'l.U'lc....m~O...Nl'l.~C....lIl I
G.l ~ ...C'\IC')..."..,......CCft---...------NNNNNNNNN
LLJ ~l ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~ ~ j
_ a:
en jf.
~
J/~" .f \
-'.
,
/"
/'; f l'
. .
'" '"
" "
... ... "l:l
. . 0
II II 0
- - .a
'" '" '"
foo foo 0
.a
.. .. .all
... .. ~o
-
- . --
. II ....
II " ).-
" l:l "
l:l l:l ..0
:I!; '" Il..:l
'" 0 "
11III 0 ",,Ill
C - II '" '"
- - p -
11III ,. =- Ol:l.
..:l
00
~~~
Sitld
~ 0:: 4(
Ul(,!)
ii5
~
z""O
~
< ,r",
I :;;.
., '_I
a. Q.I
.:'
-
Z=-I
o
-
t;:
N
-
-I
-
I-
::::>
I,! t~
iPj i Eo-.
12 I ~
JI 1 · ~
Jlllt!~
J ~ I r~....
I ~D I ~
-
Ji- .ocn.Itl~O~Itl~"'NN~.cn..lDcn
lI'l.cn-O...~cn..lDcn.lD~O-II'lIl'lO
... ~ N ~ ~ N ~-
.a
cnNlDlDS!O- lD
~""'''''''''N''''' ~
N
.a
CD
t')
....
N
III
Ii ...~ItlGl!Gl!.Gl!~~"":"l"":C')~~C!II'l~C!"l cnltl.cnOC'). ~
! NN....Itlltlltl...~II'l~...ItlO...II'l-... ~co;lIlai.....1Ii
- - - ... II)
iii
NIIl
c?~
III
III
N
~
It)
CD
......lDOO....Itl~GNlD.cncn~cn.C')
G..~..co;~o~IIi....lIiNppcllilll....
--~~~--- ~--N---N --
J ~C')lDNO-OlDItlOcn-cnlDC')cncn.-
GO~lIiO~co;p..co;Npp~lIi~~o~
---.-- - em
-
......"'-CD"N- ..,
:~&ri~~~c ~
.
~.~ l~llll
U~~~Uliiiiiijjd
. n~JbM!!!M!!8
Itlltlonltlltlltlonltlll'lll'lltlll'lltlltlll'l
~~~~~---------------
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~II)~
.n.nth~o.;,
:ec
11ooooooooooooooo~~~~~ ~~~~eo~
_i ccccc ccccc c
~ :Ji -NC').II'l~"'lD~2=~~:!:!?!:::!~~N~~~~le::;;~ ..
~~ !ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti:ti: I
.~Cl. j I OJ j
a:
l::l
;14
IIil
e
IIil
~
UIU)
'....
. .
E~!
~~
.-\fl[
1U~
.
-
.
u
..
.
Clo.
'"
.
'"
~
..
-
...
III
o
u
.
Ill:
'l:J
~
..1:1
"'Ill
00
..1:1_
.a..
..-
_u
.0
;14-
.-:
. .
;l4P04
~~i~
Wi6
W~l
~<
~(!)
~
/~,
.
..
-
III
......
III III
-.
;...
-
... ..
1lII.
..
.
.
,r-j
.., ~
E~ 1=
.-1 ft~
. . ... .- &
. . ~~!
I!j I!- " .
.!J . I! It
.0 .
1:- . Is I! u ~j
"
"I C:j u "
~i .;~ .5 :t::
~ ~'8 :t:: c: ~
c: :;)
G) " .1 :;)
Ej at
~ Ii Q i
... ~j i h
c II II ~
G)
E ~- ~
-c I ~ ~
c + I
G)
E ~
<
-
,n
ll-/:IS
..-+.~~
~ !!
L1J~~
~ LIJ ~;
~LlJb..
F;;~ c
Ul<.!)
~
~
Land Use
Districts
i\dof)ted
~:Er~ i~ ~
\." I - .,J t;::
"'" . ~.A~
~.., "-... ~' /,';'/', '. ==.:=-.:.:
";" ... \_ ~'''I''-..........-1( _ l~..__.
'\~"",\'" ~~, ~~,," 11,
.\ ... \ ,-., J Y/~ \.~\ ~.....
~\\ -.. I^.>.-J=::W - '/f ~ '\ \' ':' /i~
'.,. \ / /,/ -~ "'.... -.. '\ ~- -- ,
l _ \.r1~; /~~:::l.J \\'r'... T _ir:-i
\ _7 ~-"IZ -: I.~ \~-,(\.,\"v/ h.=-
~ (;:1 ::.:--u~\\~~_~P\~;
'-:f-+; - ~ t' - \ \ \ \'--)\0. \\ 1 ..,
, "",- ~/ ..,\ -. "--' 'I ---
\ .... ""'" 1.0; \ _ \\ _, ~;:;-..:::::-=~,~ .......~
\\ / J ~?~- ---.... ,~ I
-;:'l;"/ : \ """" (~~ ...\.~.......=-\~ ~ '\'./- I
~: RESIDENTIAL ..J~ )1) 'L (/ /?~y/;:t')//) ~~;:,
TZ--;,f+....- 'I l.".. I I ~ ,/~ \ -, "
...... .... - a DIIMCII ,-.It _ . II I -......./ (... /-/ ... /-u / ~ \.,-...) ,-,
-. / I ,....... ""'\ "',......., r ~ '~/'"
.......-~-aDllMl:t I L~1.t1.ke I-.o,/L..., '-........:..... f I 1_11 )f".~...Ie \
.......-...'..--.,DIIMl:t Birr1/8ChOOll~ '\~/ I I I "-JI ~.
.........,....ear..r-.IIIM:I _ \\_11\1 _, I L..J 1/ ... ---...I', \
:I!1 \ I~.....' II --"" I
"I~'I \'-_-''- --.J _....--. ~_ \
I I~-,r~......... ('-.J!I-~ -
"I · I " 1-,011)) ~h~~~ "--..j~.~
, f~' -:-" / HI , r - r'~, \\ ^ ,~ _7
1- H ,!\ /;; \\ \ I _7 l')-.. -, \ \..,.("~. // '-1 I \
_ft, \\ \ ~, '''\.::.''1, '
: r---::i. I \\ \ _ ......'\', \"\~,.\;~ _" ,( - I
'II -. t, / ..,~ \~ \ \ ~ '\ "~X~ ';....~ J
ILl-. ,,..},~ '\ : \ I ,- ') a \ ~
rJ k :: I ", ~ _7 \ \ I I ....~7 \ _7 \\
V ~ ~ ",)\...L...-' / /Y . \\ ~
-. ~ ........ h ., \ F)~
~:'\;\ ~it~~ . ~~\IJ
'0 ~r '~
... ~'''.... --At?
I'U_~.
--::;...""-
=--
:::::::
...... ..........- - .. DIo1rlct
...... ~..., - ... DIo1rlct
VLIJGE CEN'TER
~-' .... eo... -..
~2 .... eo... - ..
vc-a .... c.- - ....
.;;.-
SPECIAL PU=FOSE
'-'....-,~
BJSINESS CENTCR
IE] --- c.- - ............ ,.... DIH'teI
~ ...... eo... - ....--r--e ....... CIIdtcl
0.- ...... - I a.tct
0... ...... - a a.tct
0... ...... - 4 a.tct
a.._-'~
a.. ...... -. ~
_......-.,~
..... ~ C*IrlCl
LEGEND
J!:.;i.::i,::!~!:;....':!!!:'.i!!.,{ prop 0.. d 1 a Ild ... c h .Il~"
EXHIBIT F
-,-_. ( .-;;
_.._aM
-..--,
-..--
=--~~.... ...,
m Ci1ti .
u'-
7.tMt ~
J:yhihit A
~E4STLAKE
A FlAtHD c:a.M.NTY If EASllAICE ClEVBOPMHT co.
c~~k~, - jt~
),<':::, ' ~...;:,f'-.....'l/
"'- ""~. ,. ~ I ... '--'--....
~'- )0.,. ""'" '--r:/ / I ......................---
~ ..' -~,~."", '-/ ( .... ,......- ..--
\~~~ \ _ ~'y,~~,,~ I
~\\ - /^>~~':'fl.ll~'~>~ ':" ?/~
,:~ \ I /{/ -~ II J';... -sa ." ~ -'
~ - \..,1p' /AfPl,J! \ \~ - T - ~~ j
, I "7 ~tfZ -: I.~.b\ ~1~~:J~~~~ II=-
~ f1r ~'Ur:l\' ~\\ ~;:;'\~li
" ... ,V~ - ~~ .::'} - _'\\ _. '\\? 1\0..\\ _~=;;;.
\ II... I \ - \\ _. ~.;:::::--~,:--... ....~
:~-:/ I \ L.~ (ft:[i:)?/~:::-' -:.'~~ ~ ' I
-~ 1\ --.;?/'" III "- ~ '-'1 ) 'Y. ('
..-r-'P(' _ . J I r-iV /~// 7'~~.
AESIDENT1AL rz /* ~ J b l?' / IV ,/ _. ~
....... .... - 1 DIIIII:lI ~:: 'II / -...........1 ( '^ '?' - ",-u /<< \.-"'y;.~'
- I' / / r-.:::;./, " .../,......" ~
.., I.- -I CIIIlrlCI ~ ""II.... '-.......... , I I _.. ) -....: _~ \
..,....'..-,-7C111lrlC1 : ...U.k~l ',-/",/ I I "-J/ --,~
.......,.....~-.DIIIII:lI 1111~~ch,,\~tI\\ ';;, f lJ II - -.J', \
-...-... QlI - , I \ I ' II --""" I
-- .4l.4~- to - "'~'1;1 \ '-_-II... ~.....~ - -'::il ~ _ \
.., ........ c....t - a ClIIft:l I ,..-,r ~ " (" - ~ ~ -
"1I'~~"""'c......._oWIl- 'IClIeIrIct 'f\ 1....I~~i!)~~"""i "" /~'J
... \. jl-...-JI' 1 """'-r' .........,\' - '-../
~:;:.;::= lr\.~-:/;;J- \, \ (- l ..,,:\:\.L~~ //"--J; \..,
n _"' r\\ \ I~' '"\i... ~ '
All'j .........I'.....,-..DlMrlct :r---~\lC4} \\ \- /"\', \', ~ ......'( - I
VI..L.AGE CENTCR II -. ['<~_.~?; \ \ 'I >!' .,~,.........~ )
~-' ....c.w.-_ Iil... ,r-S~ ~ \ \ I ,-), .~ ~
YC-2 .... c.w. - ... ~ k -: ( / ~.., \ \ I I .....'i. 71"'~\\.., \\
YC-I .... c.- _ IIIlIl V ~ VOl.. ~ ,)\...L/ / .-:7\ _tI \\
_ /' ~ ./ // \ )~.--::liiili
~, ~...l.~~?\\
, " _" ~h
, , "
-' , ~A
~, , :~,:~d'
'" ,....:;;0.0-
--;,;;;----
;::::::. --
Land Use
Districts
PrOI)Osed
:::::::
EI.JSIeS CENTER
~ ~ c.- - ............. .... ClII1rtI:l
~ ...... c- - ........... ..... DlMrlct
SPECIAL PI.FFOSE
01-, '-' .... - , a.tcI
0... .... - I .....
0... .... - ''''''
0... .... - . CIIIftl
a.- .... - . CIIIftl
a.- .... - . DlMrlct
a.- .... - 7 CIIIftl
,... ~ ClIeIrIct
LBGBND
1
ii
.......
';::" :.;.;:.:.::.:.:
h:\::}{}:}.::
:;;$:;;;( propo.ed laDd. .... chaD'"
EXHIBIT G
/,
/ :;'
~.
-..--..
-..--.
-..--
=::-_~n'~ _ I aeo,
m Ci1ti '
~ &.-x-
Jot.... ~
IrsorlS
~E4STLAKE
A PLANe) CCM4N1Y If EASn.NCE tIEVB.OflMNr CO
F= vhihU A
ATTACHMENT 4
EIR-86-04 ADDENDUM
./
/:;; 09
SECOND ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FSEIR 86-04 (B)
PROJECT NAME: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
PROJECT LOCATION: Various parcels within the EastLake Greens SPA between Hunte
Parkway and the future SR-125 Row north of the future E. Orange
Ave.
I. INTRODUCTION
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental
Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or
Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present:
1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion
of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration that have not created any new
significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or
Negative Declaration; or
2. Changes in circumstances, additional or refined information available since
completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential
environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives
available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show
that the project will have or more significant impacts which were not previously
addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration.
3. The changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise new issues about the
significant effects on the environment.
II. PROPOSED PROJECT REVISIONS
The Amendments proposed can be grouped in the following general categories:
1. Park Relocations
2. Density Transfers and Parcel Boundary Adjustments
3. Removal of Interim Designation on Parcel R-26
1. Park Relocations
The Neighborhood Park (parcel P-3) in the adopted plan was partially within the
SDG&E easement and contained less than ten acres of net useable acres for park
use. The park is proposed by this amendment to be relocated southeasterly of
/ "':,. - ,;;, -:;,-
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
2
Parcel R-20 and to contain 10.0 acres net useable for park uses (11.8 acres
gross). This relocation deletes former residential Parcel R-21. The former
location of the park is proposed to be converted to Public/Quasi-Public as an
expansion of existing Parcel PQ-2. This additional 11.0 acres will be available
for Community Purpose Facilities.
A second park relocation involves Parcel P-S, which was a Private Neighborhood
Park between Parcels R-20 and R-21. This park is proposed to be relocated near
the intersection of South Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway adjacent to Parcel
R-12. No significant change in acreage is proposed.
2. Density Transfers and Boundary Adjustments
Reductions in densities are proposed in eleven residential parcels. Increases in
densities are proposed in four residential parcels. The net result of these density
transfers is a 133 unit decrease in the overall residential density. Most of the
density transfers are minor adjustments that reflect units achieved in the tract map
and design review process. The following parcels are proposed to be changed in
a more substantive way (more than 10 du):
Parcel
ProJ>Osed Chan~e
R-6
R-16
R-20
R-21
R-23
R-26
-12
+26
-37
-120
-142
+ 200 (The Adopted Plan provided this
parcel with an interim density.)
Boundary adjustments occur primarily as a result of Park relocations and are
proposed to be reflected in the amended Tentative Tract Map. These adjustments
result in a net loss of 11.8 acres of residential land. An increase of 11.0 acres
has been added as Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) and the remaining 0.8 acres has been
added as Park.
The following shows the existing and proposed changes in land use and acreage
on the General Development Plan.
/:' ~.;
/'
I,/-~'./ ./
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
3
Existing Proposed
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres dulac Units Land Use AcrG$ dulac Units
I~ 250.5 0.3 743 I~ 250.5 0.3 743
LM LowIMldlum 389.6 o.e 2008 LM LowJMedium 38 1.0 o.e 1803
M Medium 242.2 ~". 1875 M Medium 251.1 ~". 2D23
MH Medium'High 125.4 11.18. 1684 MH Medium'High 100.0 11-18. 1348
H High 11.0 18-27+ 250 H High 24.3 18-27+ 510
S~ Tatal 1018.7 6660 S~ToIaI 1006.8 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres Land Use Acres
Retail 51.8 Retail 51.8
Prof. & Admin. 6.8 Prof. & Admin. 1.8
Res. & lid. Mfgr. 135.8 Res. & lid. Mfgr. 135.8
Open Space 187.6 Open Space 187.6
PubliclQulISi-Pub. 137.9 PubIicIQuasi-Pub. 14U
Parks & Rec. 295.4 Partes & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7 Major Circulation 214.7
sua, Total 1030.2 S~ Total 1042.0
~Future Urban 72.9 ~Future Urban 72.8
Project Totals 2121.8 6660 Project Totals 2121.8 6527
3. Removal of Interim Designation for Parcel R-26
Parcel R-26 was given an Interim Designation on the Adopted SPA Plan. This
designation indicated that the density of 4.5 du/ae would be subject to future
amendment to reflect the Chula Vista General Plan. The Interim Designation was
assigned to allow an Affordable Housing Program for all of Eastlake to be
developed. This program has proceeded and has designated this parcel as a site
to implement a portion of the Chula Vista Housing Element requirement for
Affordable Housing. The increase in density is proposed to allow this program
to be implemented.
/:' . & / :;7
General
Development
Plan
.L;\dOI)ted
RESIDENTIAL
MAX.
LN\D USE ACHS D.Ji AC lHTS
CQ~ 250.5 ~3 743
~ Low/MeclUn 381.6 3-6 2008
~~ 242.2 &-11 1175 PO
.... ~ 1254 11-1. 116<1
~ Itct1 11.0 1&-27+ 250
Sib- T 0leI 1018.7 tl60
N:)N -RESDENTlAL L
L.AKl LEE ACRES
CQ ANI .
61.8
~"'..A_""I 8..
~a_
~ =~-.rog 135.8
~ ep.,...~ 1876
~ Pl.tJlc/~~ 137.8
P ...... I AIr:ftdon Nil 4
~ "'10' Craia\lal'l 2147
~TOleI 1ll302
~ FWn U1IIn 72.9
fIraiKt TGIaI 2121.8 ac 1680 CIu
. ~t. c..urct\ ...
.)._~__'''_____
....__..0...___
~ fASTLAKE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTl.AKE DEVELOPMENT CO.
~inti ~
Land Plannina l j
-....I.......~- L. .....
r-.~_._
/&~ _ _.V~
/..-1- _)
Exhibit 1
.
General
Development
Plan
PrOI)Osed
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres dulse Units
I Low
lM Low/Medium
M Medium
MH MediumIHigh
H High
Sub- T olel
250.5 0-3 743
381.0 o.e 1903
251.1 6-11. 2023
100.0 11.18. 1348
24.3 18-27+ 510
1006.9 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
Retail 51.9
Prof. & Admin. 6.8
Res & ltd. Mfgr. 135.9
Open Space 187.6
PubUclQUlsi-Pub. 148.9
Parks & Rae. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub-Total 1042.0
IBL:JFulure Urban 72.9
Project Totals 2121.8 6527
.. ~,. ca..r... ....
1Il1.-.....--_._-~--
. .. ........ ~ _ CIMI v... a..rat .-.n
~ fASTLAKE
A flLAN'oE) ~ITV ft( EASTLAKE DEVE1.OPt.JENT CO.
~inti ~
Land Plonnina I. J
_,-C._Ir'-_ ~ ~
r-.-'I_._
1110/85
/. ~~/
;. '''- /'-
Exhibit 1
w
I
j
E~ I (
:!
~I ~
.a T'~ J
401 c.
- \ill
..... _& L
CI:) ....
N It
.:31
..lil
cwS:a
i i 1,1
J eMeNo-oo~o.-.eM...- N
!~-,g~~:.~N~~he.~i~ cwS
It) IJ f
- CI:)
II J llll !, I
~niullliiiUJi~ I~ 1
)t
-1,1 . . . . !!!!!!!I fJ
~ I J
j ! fI
. :
Z_II .a
<C :::r,~ L .O..ltlIllOlllltllll....MNlIlltlM.....lDIIlO-.lDIIlO.O -
~,. J!ltl.OOOllllD...IIl..IIlIllIll_lIlltl.N._.....lD.1Il ....
......i' --- N" N ----(\I :e
I ......1,
--- -11I1
CL ':' lil
"'::: II "":"":C!~~'"':~~~~C!~~~C!~C\!C!~~C!'"':~C\!~~~C! :a
II NNltl..~~ltlltlltllDlIllD....ltl""""lDO.NMM.O..._
-~ ... --- ... -
z....::.1..1 ci
o
-
t(
N
-
-J
-
I-
::>
i
........lDOo......ltl.eMlD.lDltl..........oeeO.M.- _
!:;:g~g~e~~~~=:g~m~~ge~~~~ee ~
.
~ltlltlltlltlltlltl~ltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltlltl~ltlltl ltl
~~~~~---------------------~-
ooooc~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
-)
7//
L&J~ Jij
~Z~
LIJ !~
~<
UltD
:is
~
-
o
----f--~'f~
- ..
! !!
Z "';.,:: h ~
c:( ~~ .~~I~~il~'~~::!~~~! ~~,~~~~ ~
;.1,1, . .... N..... C\iI ...... ... ~
.J l....:~
..."
'"' .....". U
.- .......1 ·
.:::. }:I ~~""C!C!~C!II'!~:;~""~C!"l"lC!lI! ClI!....~ClI!....~~ :a
'li-I .I NN....InIl)In" ."In~"In=". =.,..~.. ·
Z~II .-
o x
- ~
ta: ·
N
-
..J
-
....
::>
"".OO."In~~......."
~:;:~~!~.~~~:;e~G::
.......,-Clt~N-
:glri...:!.~
I ..,.NO-O.InO.-.."...-
ON~OO~~~."N~~~..~O~
............ .. '!m
It Jlill!lll....... t
a~Jifl !111JJl!~
~t!81 . !!!!M!!~
1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1n1l)1n1n Inlnln~ In
~~~~~---------...-......... -~..._~~..
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~~~~o~
:€c
IIQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~~~~~ ~~~~eQ~
ccccc ccccc <
:i Ii
eel .O~".In."..O-N".In.~. ~
-; I ~~~'!~ll?":-ll?~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I
~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ j
1i)
CI)
a:
"
:/
/ i -- 7/
.e
CD
(')
,...
C\I
E.., ,
~ ,
.-\f'r
1l\~
C\li
c?:ij
I
I,! I
~I I I
., I I
I~ J I
t i J
Jill II
J: t Ii
~ 0 I
.X
C\I
c?
It'l
ClCl
e
~
-
U
Gl
e-
Q.
UJ~ J;I
~Zf~
SUJ 85
~~I~
iJl(D
;jS
~
Land Use
Districts
.L~dOI}ted
r;-: r~ ::1 ~
~!',,~ I - Jl=:y
"'" . ~/lf1.-...:
~ ",,~I ,:,/" I' '. &.8MllM_."
~ ~ '" ''''?''':/'' I ~---
f'" '" ~'_I" '-/ ( IIC-n ...-- ..__
.. .....~'r--... l "-" ~ I" 1\
\ \ ....~ "" \ ~ j'Y/~'"'' '\ ~ "\
:\\ .... /^;~::W - Yl.l.'f^,~~~'\~_. ':" ~/~
\r.' \ f /''' - ~ - - h'tJ- \ _II ~-
":' ~\./ i7...,\::'1~1 #~~ \~\ &-1 J &-1
I \',1",,;'/~Pl)1 \ \~ .... c;,-- .... -lj
'\ - I'" ~II/.~ -.: ~~..b\ \~.It~'\~ 11-
Gf' 'J 'U)~\ r--'~,\\ ,,<;::'\~1
-'!:~ - ~~ - ~l- \\_\\\ -. \-\~ )\0.",1 -=-:.
I \ - \... .... ::::=.::...;::: ':::::::::.' /\
\ -. \ \ .c-. ~.:;;-- -~::-.... .\
.;::::-~- -- ~:--.. I~
-'\-:,/ : \ J. (it1?//-' ---. ';':~\~~'
...- II ~ I' V"_~~...,) 'Y.
-- RESI~""'" _..-t-~ - ,I,) II ~i-V /' / //"-' ,..
~l""'" T"'T......"hl', II I .:f" I, I ~ ;t ~
,;..-......r:r ,....... lr.-..;;- /) ./ \ -. )
............-la.tlII .....L~ 'II / ...........1 (.... ~ -/-"-.J / ~ \.-'y()~'
-, / I r-....... ." , ",......." ~ /Wl
.............. -I DlIMI:l I1II ""0/(, '-....,," , I /IIC-") r-:. _~ c:- \
.............'....,-7D11lr1l:t : \1 Ir-tl ,-/....j J I "-JI --~~
...............~-.CIII'taI 1" _ \\_..,I~, I L.J II - ~'I \
: I!\ \~-..... I II -"'" ~
_'~'I \ L_-''- "-' _ ,,--. ".....-- _ \
I 1"-1r~.......... ("-~~___ -
I I I\. IIIIC-'ol~ ~...=-ilt'- h-::!<= ~ '" /~"
_I I '\. Jl--I '1 "~r '''''7\' _ -........:
......... ~ - 22 DlIMI:l I f\.:;-' I II' I (''2\'' ~ / ' ' -,
...................., - II DlA1ct II '\: '1- \\ \ I .., l .., \. \,.,..\::~ / "'--Ii \
Ik~AIoI ..........., -" 0Idll:t : ~.'t f\\ \ L-~'\. h ~'O~ ~ lle-tI /; - 1
II J - ) \\ \ oo:!--:.... \ , \ "". \. . (
_. '( IIC-tl\\ y- ..' \ \ I ,," ~-....-:: -;.....~
Ilk. ,rwc-i", , ~~1 \ I /- ) '-t7~ ~ }
rJ k --Ii " ~.., \ \ I I ///f/ \ \ .., \\
V ~ " ~ \J\..L......... / ~/Y\_1I \\
_ ~ /' // \ J'-
'"' IIC-'. "::,.. r-P":"O~'
EI.JSIESS ~ ,,\ ~~==~ rA '\
" ~ - ~.".. e.\ ,.,
~ ..... c..or - ............ ~ 0Idll:t .;, '\.(/ 4r.A-../
~ ..... c..or - ............. ..... 0Idll:t pu~,\.. -#7fJ"
--~-
S'ECL<L. F\FFOSE ---:;:::....?'"
---
::::::
VL1.AGE c:cNTER
~' v-... c.... - -
YC-2 VWtoge c..or - ...
YC-I v-... c... - ...
c.-..... - , ~
o..n ..... - I ...
o..n ..... - 1 o.Icl
o..n ..... - 4 DIIlrIl:t
o..n ..... - . ~
o..n ..... - . o.rtd
o..n ..... - 7 ...
..... .... ~
~ E"ASTLAKE
A fII.NHD cet.MHTY IV EASnNCE DEVB.OPM:Hr co.
-..--..
-..--.
-..--
=-_~~-aIM1
m Ci1ti .
~'~
7otM4 ~
~ -
"
7/~
~ ,;{
Exhibit A
r;:' r~
~!',~ I - Jill
~, _---:::-...:::l~
.., '- '-~. ,-/'" I '. ~-_....
~ ~ " " '~/' /' I...................... .....
. \_ ll!:.l. ,... '- "" / ( IlC-n ,..-- .. _ -.
, -., ~r \', '- II
\~,-f'" .... --"y:~~""
~\\ .... /^>~U=YI.,(f\-"':':'~~"~ ':" ~1/~
\(\ \ I /,/ -~ ~--t i- 1"''' '~- ..
'.' t-"\ I 17.., (";:-1~ #-::;.~ \ '\ -- ) ~.
.~ 'W_I'-r1~~~~'~J \ \\\- ~.l:1J.i -ll~1
\ .., ~.ff....... -.: I.~b\ \~.I(~~~ h~
(;:1 ......, 'U)~\ r--'~~ --<;:::'\~1
...,(/~ - ~~ - ~/- \...\\\ wo-. \\~~' )\;.,\\1_~=;;~
\ 1'/.., I \ - \\wo-. ..-I,,;:;-..:;:::::::-~,::--. ......~
\, ~~~_- ~ ~~ I
..\"'/ :.> (~ /' -. ~ .... '- ~ './,'
;:.; 1\\ ~~Il' .~/ v~~ '-'1 ') ~ ("
RESIDENTIAL ......,. '?f - . IJ I (ll / - -r~<//' // //~';:..'
T?- -:;:,"l,l i-.... J 1/ I "?"' :;r / I ~ ~/;;t:\ wo-, -......:::
.........-.1IIMl:I L-:~~ .r'll I '-........If /~ -"'-)-f' I,' ~ \.-'y;.)~'
-. / I ,.........../"^, ./ r ~ /'"
- ,- .......... - .1.lIIncl I ' 1...' IlC-n r---
II / ;"te/, ' '-......... '""\ : I I 1lC-', ,-.....: -::.:=--~, \
......., ..... ,..., - 7 0IIn:t : \1 I r--t ,~/.... I I I "-J / ~
...........~-.CIIItSt I' ~ .... \\_,.\1 .., I L,.I II - ~\, \
---- Cll....4J:.... -10 CIIItSt __.~: 1 ;11 I L._ J~~'--1 .... _~( I ~ \
......., ,..,., c...c - D I.lIIncl 1 I ,. -,r ~ -........ r'" -~ ~ -
~ 'f .. CGnlIaIIlIrUn - 1. DIaIrIr:t ...." IIIC-tel~ ~~~.;) \ ...............,..../~ ~
.......... ~ -12 ~ 1 f "':7' J f--11 , r - r-,:\, ' \ 7' ~ ..,
-II r ........~ - 21 DIIIrtct "r "" ,~JI - \\ \ l~'" [ "', \.,.r"\;~. / "--J; \
" _n' -r\\ \ \ " ~, ,'. ..... " _
Fk~"'" IIUII-f'~ - ... OIItrtl:l . r-- t I \ \ \ -. \, , \. '( I
II - VC-3 J \_..... \ \ , , . ,., .
· wa-. '( 1lC-'~ ..y.;;--.., \ \' '\R~ ~~ ';......~
Il=-- Ill... ,~, , V! \ i) - ') ~~.;.: ~!
YC-2 w.ee c..... - ... rJ k -, I ",." ~.., \ \ ~/,//"7t'-\ \ .., ~
YC-I .... 0... _ .. v ~ V 05-4 ~ 'J / /1/\_" \\ .
... / \ ,,/ h"'''' \ #1.-
Do ~~l:! --.~ ~,RS-S ~...L M:-~ ~?' \
~ \,<g"'g-1 , , r _ "A"" e.' I'J
~ --- c... - ~ ... DIaIrIr:t ~", (' f!IY.AI "
~ ...... c..... -......,......... a.ftl ",~'_',,-I----#'d'
_..~-
--~
-
'il
Land Use
Districts
. Pro I)Osed
:::::=:
SPECIAL PU=FOSE
'-' .... - 1 DIIIrtct
0.- .... - , a.tcl
0.- .... - II.lIIncl
0.- .... - 4 a.tcl
o.w. .... - I a.tcl
o.w. .... - . a.ftl
o.w. .... - 7 DIIIItDt
..... an.. a.tcl
/~J
/./ ;;,'
/' ,/
-..-....
----.
----
=-_~~-&-n
m Ci1ti .
~&~
Fot.... ~
1110/15
.4 E"ASTLAKE
A PlANe) eot.MHTY IV EAS11AICE DEVB.aWENT CQ
exhibit A
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
ID. CHANGES IN IMPACT ANALYSIS
4
The project site has be graded for sometime and this minor shift in land uses and minor
modifications to densities will not result in any change in the natural environment. the
provision of public facilities was programmed in the original EastLake GDP/SPA at a
specific density. The minor reduction and density shifts that part of this proposal would
not significantly impact the provision of these services. the minor reduction in
population would result in a commensuration reduction in related impacts.
IV. CONCLUSION
Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above
discussion, 1 hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in
only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the previously
sited FEIR adequate under CEQA.
V. REFERENCES
EIR-96-04 EastLake Greens
EIR-96-04 (A) Addendum
15-96-04 EastLake Greens GP A/SP A Modification
General Plan, City of Chula Vista
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures.
/ '/-- 7;/
r;........~
. " -~ ~.~:-:\.r~-r-,
...1)rnir'o{rn to COll\l1111I1it~ gnliN
OCro
1: 799c;
D , -
lL;. ,
\.>1-,:
VIA PAX "1-5171
, U.S. Mail
10595 JAMACHA BOULEVARD. SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91977
TELEPHONE S70-2222. AREA CODE 619
1995
Mr. Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912-1087
Re: Proposed Amendment to the Adopted BastLake II General
Development Plan (GDP), Related to the BastLake Greens
and an Amendment to the SPA Plan, and the Tentative Tract
Map (IS-'6-05).
Dear Mr. Reid:
The otay Water District (OWD) would like to have ample opportu-
nity to review and respond to any environmental documentation
(Negative Declaration or EIR) relating to the above referenced
project.
OWD may have site needs for the future 711-3 reservoir and other
water facilities as well, thus requiring the site(s) and pipeline
routes to be called out on any adopted EastLake II General
Development Plan (GDP).
Please contact me at 670-2293 or John Garcia at 670-2213 if you
need any information or have any questions with regard to water
facilities or service. We look forward to reviewing and res-
ponding to your completed environmental Initial study/Negative
Declaration or Draft EIR.
Sincerely,
~i!.m~~'
Environmental Specialist
MFC:cp
cc: Tim Stanton
Jim Peasley
John Garcia
Chris Craven
Rebecca Patton
/,. - -/::-..-
J ,/_
'. / - /
Sweetwater Union High School DIstrict
Administration Center
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91911-2896
(619) 691-5500 -.;. -
Divis/on of Punnln'3nd F3cllldes
Ms. Barbara Reid
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Reid:
Re: Proposed Eilstlilke Generill Development Pliln Chilnges
The Sweetwater Union High School District does not object to the proposed
amendments to the EastLake II General Development Plan. Community Facilities
District No. 1 (CFD No.1) was established to mitigate this project's Impacts to
schools. However, thank you for the notification, It Is good that the district Is kept
Informed of these changes.
Thomas Silva
Direaor of Planning
TSlml
/";} ,/?/
ATTACHMENT 5
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
// ~. //:;;;/
10/17/1ggS 09:16
61g691S171
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PAGE 04
nlE CITY OP CHU1.4 VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Ire required to file I SUllcmenl of Di~losure of certain ownership or nnancill Interests, payment!, or Clmpaien
rlbullon&. on all mailers which will require dt5ctctionlry aCllon on the part of the City Council, Pllnnlna Commission. and
III other omclal bodies. The following 'nformation must be disclO$ed:
1. list the names of all persons havina a "nanclal Interest In tbe property which II the lubJecl of the application or the
contr.ct, e.I.. owner. applicant, contractor, lubcontrlctor, materialluppUer. I
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
. 2. If any penon' Identified pUl"$oant to (I) above lIa corporation or partnerltllp, Ust the nlma or aUlncSMduall owning
",ore tbln 10% of the shares In the corporation or ownlna any plnnell"'p (ntcreat In the plnnenhlp.
BOSWELL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
THE TULAGO COMPANY
3. If Iny person' Idcntlned Jlursuant to (1) above Is non.prone orsanlZltlon or a trust, lilt tbe nama of Iny person
&ervlng as director of the non.pront oraanizatlon or u truslee or beneficiary or trustor or the trust.
N/A
.......
~. Have you had more than S2S0 worth or business transacted with any member of the City &taft'. Boards. Commwlonl.
Committees. and Council within Ihe put twelve months' Yes_ No.:!!,. Ie yes, please indicate peBOn(s):
.5. Plwe Idenllfy each and every person, InclUdln& any laents, employees, coftJutllntl. or Independent c:IOctractol'5 wbo
you have assigned to represent )'Ou bdore the Clly In this mauer.
GaTV Cinti. Cinti Land PlanninR
.
Gail Crocenzi, EastLake Development Co.
ROller Bhat:i.a. Ri.ck En2i.neerinst
Bill Ostrem. EastLalte DevelolJ1Dent CO.
6. Have you and/or )IOtlr officers Dr Ilenu.ln tbe _Urel.te, conUlbutcd more than $1,000 to I Councilmcmber In the
current or precedln& elcctlon period? YeI_ No_ If yeI, Itlte which Coundlmembcr(I):
· · · (NOTE: At1adl addltJouJ paIS.
Date: I D - (K" - 9 c;-
Cail CTn~~n~i- ARRiAt:an~ Proiect Manaster
Print or type Dime or contractotlappllcant
. fI%!!a" *fIM4.: -All)' INlividu_~ fin"" ","~lp.JoW llMUf. ...-... ~ cW."..,...",.,.faHW\ ~ .......... ~
I#UI .wI WiY-- COWU)', dty .11I cOlIIII/')'. clly ,,,,,,,uc~Jity, dillftcr, ttt.fIt fJOJitic.r .,u;~ fit "" odwr .., fit ~ ..... · · WIlL-
/". /'~
THE STAFF REPORT FOR THIS ITEM IS LOCATED
IN THE COUNCIL NOTEBOOK -- ITEM 15
/~) ;;'-;;l
ATTACHMENT 1
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
AND
ORDINANCE
/':; /)
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBITS
r
PROJECT
LOCATION
----
\
\ I
\ \
u
Lower Ofay Reservoir
.
EXHIBIT A
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT EAST LAKE 0ESCRII'll0N:
~ Al'PUCANT: DEVELOPMENT CO. Miscellaneous:
!'ROJECT Eastlake Greens Request: To emend the Eutllike Greens SPA (Sec:tl0NI1 Planning
AODRESS:
Ala) and the PFFP (pubHe Facilities Financing Plan).
SCALE: fILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale peM . 95 . 11
/'
>J
,
. '
General
Development
Plan
.L.\d OI)ted
M } . 1
.
.
I
.
,
RESIDENTIAL
MU
LAN) USE ACAES Q"vAC LHTS
L a.- 21Q.1 0-3 U3
l.M ~/""'" II'" .. 100I
M IoWcIIIII 24U .." 1176 PO
Y-4 ~ '256 "-11 ,...
H "'" ".0 1~27 . 110
~TOIaI '011.7 16.0
N:lN -RES[)ENTlAL.
LNC) l.IlE ACRES
I :0 ~ :'-.. .~
MlnWw_
... ~~ 136.8
~' c.-... 117.1
.PO ,~~ 137A
, ,.... I....... Ie! 4
I '*ID' CIraa.. 2 I. 7
~T.. 1ll3O.2
~ ,..,. '*"
'"-' T.
nt
1121.1 ac
tNO~
.---
Amendment Key
..-.......--.-----
..-------
-
_it .Y::
..... ...,'.. ,...... .-.... ..........
.} <::f :;/ .:( ,:-:/
.... -' '". '-.
Areas being Amended
..:f E"ASTLAKE
A PLANNED C~ITY BY EAST1.AKE ClEVEl.OPtICNT CO.
EXHIBIT B-1
~iD!irT'
~.~~"! ~ ~
.~
I ill ._._
~
/ "
r,./
J1J
General
Development
Plaq
PrOI)Osed
'0'"
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use
Acres dulse Units
I Low
LM LawlMeclium
M Medium
MH Medium/High
, H High
Su~ Totll
250.5 0.3 743
381.0 0-6 1~3
251.1 6-11. 2023
115.3 11.18. 1608
11.0 18-27+ 250
100ag 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
C Retail 5U
C.O Prof. & Admin. 6.8
I.R Res. & lid Mfgr. 135g
o Open Space 187.6
PO PubliclOulli-Pub. 1<4S.g
P Parks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circy\alion 2147
S~TotIl 10400
EQ:JFutur. Uft)ln n:e
project Totals 2121.8
PO
6527
.----
Amendment Key
..-....---.--
..----===-
.
...........
. .. , . . . .. ,_. . -."
. .... -..... ,-. ','"
... ...--..-.... -...,',. -.....
'.' .-'.' ..... ... ....
.... ....... .'.-,'. ..,-.... .,......
.' ... ..... .... ....
.. ..... ..' .... ..
. .... ,.. . ' . .. ,..
}...'..:.... .,..........:.............................
.... ..... ..... .-.... ......
..... ..,' --.. ....
." .." ..... ...
:". - ::-: -:~.: .:'~:-: .''::':-
.-.... ,.' .-".....
Areas being Amended
~ E"ASTLAKE
A PlANNED c:oMMJNlTY If EASTLAKE ~ co
EXHIBIT B-2
~tmi~
~.~~"1 ~ ~
~--...
. - 1_.-
.,..
./
I,!
I) f
I, J
IJ 1
)1
1i III j
I ~ : II
if' ~~
Z""O i
., ,"':' If .0.."'.oe"'e...."'N."''''......0-...0.0 -
~ "'.ooo.........e.-."'.N._...........
~ ......~ C'llI ~ ~ .......--N I
-:::.,
CL. ,~ II
~~ I .......O"'.-.."'.O"'''''''..N.e'''O-'''N''''''.. j
~ NN~..~~~~~...~~~~.O.N~~.O... ~
Z """':.i..t - --- - ·
c:> I ........00......"'.."'..."'..........0..0."'._ !
t;: I !:;~~~!!.~::~::!~.:~!!~~~~.. !
...IN I 11I"''''''''''''''''''''''11I'''11I11I''''''11I''''''11I11I''' III
~~~~~...~........................................................~...
ooooo~~~~~~m~~~m~~~~~~~~~o~
~
::::>
.~~""O"':OO~OIl!"':II!~~II!II!~"':J ~ ~
=~.'~~"':.ftN--"'..lIli~ ~ ~
. - · CI
/ ~. \ //
i
~
f'-
CI
N
EJI
~n~
u
E--.c
~
~
~
ct~
~
.11
.;j
. .
.. ..
. .
.... .... '"
. . 0
.. . 0
. . .II
.. .. ..
.. .. 0
't:I h ""
h Q.l .. .a.
.. ... ... ..0
... Q) . ... ...
. - .. ...
.. en ~.
c:: .
. ~ u
~ ~ lC ..0
... -..
iii .. ~ .. ~....
III 0 <Il 0
C - - . .. ..
. ... . .
III c:: :I
..:I :I ::> get..
..... O~
....
~~H
.. W'6
W"
~c
~(!)
~
Z~ Ii
<( ~~ .O~.~COC~C~NNC.~..G=
..., '! ~.=-O~C~..G~.GCO-otIotIO
:;,t':.. ~ po.. N ~ ~ N ......
'0
r"',
o I ~~otIGC.G~l't-C-"~.O~~OC
Z ~ NN....~~~~.~.~~~~~=~
o~
~
N
-
..J
i=
:J
~~GOO.~otI~~G...C..~
=:~~~~s~e~::~::!~.::
i
.NlIllll!O- ~
~~.~ .", ...
C\I
Ii
-
.otI.CIlO~. i
-"GiGi~..
- - C!
C
Ii
~~-.f'tC\I- ft
:g"'...::!Cltc ~
""
otIon on lIWl 1ft
-_..~aft..
.';'';'~Otft
!! Jlllll I
:I! m'fmIUiliJi]8
j ~ blsiUi!!!u!!1
en '11--N -C\lft.~.~
cf I . ~~~:;:~~~~i88888SS
c
i
i
m
C')
...
C\I
C\f.!
C')i
E--'I
~.
._, rl~
C. II
\)-11
Lc
~J
I,! t~
mi~
III I ~
II it i ~
J ~D I ~
II
C\I
(I)
It)
m
~~"
LIJ 16
LIJ i'
~c
~(D
~
ft.C\lO-O.otIO.-..~CIl..-
=~_2~~:.~N~~~..~i~
-
1ft",,,,on~,,,,,,on~lft,,,on,,,1ft1ft
~~~~~..~...................._--
ooooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
zie
IIQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ~~~~~ ~~~~~Q~
ccccc ccccc c
:i i
1: II · O-N"'."'C"'lIl~O-N"'.IftC"'lIl I
E ..~~.~e~e~--________~N~~~~~NN
i j~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OD i
I~"
!
..
! !
.
..
-
~ m
....
-.
-.
-:...
-
14"
..:
.
~
J'
Q
~
..
C
..
~
if......'.'.....
.
.
-
.
u
..
.
liloc
..,
.
..
.
..
-
..
.
o
u
.
-=
j
=..
.~
...
..
_u
.0
~-
.-:
..
~.
r;:\.::~- f'~ i ~ ~
~ " l ... -'r.:v
~, .~..;::!~
.-, ,~..;.-// It ~==-=-.::
~ ..' \~,~.,,-/' \ ... ~.__.
\~~~ \ _ ~'y:~~' '\ II
~\ - U~~~~,~\,~ ~'f
\i.. ~\./ f-,~lJI'#~~ \~\ ... J ...
I _ \..1....... /~r::lj ,"r - "'i -1L::1
\ -, ~tlZ -.: I.~ \~Jt'').~ h.=- .....
\ (]r ~-uJ}':1--\ r~" ~(\~i
. .'I:~ ... ~ t ... \ \ \'",:,;;: "\\ \7 ...,
! ,,~ ~/ ...\:: \~, "'~,~\ -~=-..,
\.. I \ \\.... ~~--... ',~ """~
, I )'~.,ii' - -- ~ '
;);/ I \ ~(~uy~"" ,'~'
..~ I'_.r,r 1\1 I ~~ "/')~~""
AESIDEHTlAL ...-t- ~, - / t' L?' / .., ~/:L ~ ~
rz. '/1[ -.... 'I..,.. I I' .../'" ,-,"
J......t". II I .........../(..../x "',,-u I ~ \....-.... Y...
&01 ..... - I DIIftt - I I ,..... I' .-/,....., I ~ ...'~
l- ~ · u. ke '-tell"" '\........ ~ I J J.....) f". .....;.. ..I C \
..........'..,-fDllftll Birr18CbOOl/M\ ,~....... I I '-JI ~.
.........,.....an.-...... 11\"" \\-..\~..... I L..I 11 ... ~', \
...~. II \ ~- -'~ ~ ......J - --::it I y;;: ,
I /,.-'r~ -........ r....JL-~ ...
, " I.....lry:;~~~ ~p-- "'" i'
... I f~~ JHI I i-r'~ \~'\ ^ i~-.'
AMlI ........, - II a..tct 11 ~,il .... \\ \ I - l "'" '~...~ /' '-J I \
AdIlWll-f''''-''a..tct :r---'f~\\ \~" r.~.~~ .... ,:/... I
II - J \\ \~.... , 1 \ · X (
VI..L.JGE a:NTER ; I -. \, {, _..\\ y- ~ \ 'I '<g~ ~ .,;.....'" }
~ Ill. _ ,r-'~ ~~~ ~ \ ... ') M \ '~
:; = =:: ~ k -, I ". ~... \ d I ....///1 ~... \\
V'C-I .... c... _ ... v ~ ' ~ V\..l.,.;' / ~#\,..,. '\ \
.. ~ /' A// \ :1) \".
8JSIPESS ~ ~~.. ~..l.~3-~~\\
, ...-r _ ,,~ ,.,
~ ____ c... - \lIIr'--, ~ DIIIIlct " . "
~ ..... c... - .....Ila........ ....... ~ ... >,~... --A'V
"'~-
---~~
---
Land Use
Districts
AdoI)ted
:::::::
;;-
'- .... - t ......
Ole .... -I ......
0... .... - . ......
0... .... - . ......
0........-
Ole .... - . .......
_....-~-
.., ..... ..... ......
LaGaND
J'::.':!i::::'l;::':::':::~::'::;':;::( ,ro,o... I..~ .,. eb..,..
EXHIBIT E
.4! EASTLAKE
A PLAtND CCM4NTY If EASrLNCE CEVBaMNT co
-..--.
-..--,
-..--
=:-_~~-.-t
~?:L.
,...... ~
,
\ ( .
Land Use
Districts
PrOI)Osed
r;-;I \ '~
~!'~' ~ - j~
'-.: " . ~.,.::, '1/
.. ,~. . -/ ,. ...--...
...,. '" ,-...,(/( ---
\~~~ \"-'..:=~y?~~,,,.... II --_.
,\ _ //).~.LCYII~~~'\~
u-\ \ (t'/'" -~ ~--tt/t~ -- '\ :00.::
. f'V t(-~~ #.~~ \~\ eM J - . .
~ ~lp /~~"'r 1J 'r- ""', ... 'll~
, -. - ~-l.- -: 'Y-~ f~ :k"~~ 1i=1 -
Qf '-FlJ) -, ~" ~-:;.i
-:r~ - ~ ... .t - \ \ \'-J..~~\\~l ....
,,~ ~/ ~\.... 'e' 04~'\\ _~=__
\ _, I \ - \\ ... -;.;;,;::::::-__... ,,~ """
:;.\,:,/ \ ~(it:[i~~~::-~\-/.il\\
-~ FtESIDEHTIAL - I ~ 1\) 1/ :;::=.~ ~~;/ ~~ ..,
f2,,/ ;....... /b ~?' I IV -" ,"" ~
__.......-1.... '-~. II I .........Ii;;( ........-H. I I ~ \.-... Jr
&I -- -I DIIftl - / I ""::::: '" ,..." , ~ -::If'/--
.....--..- IV..tl"('1r\;:;:>, / J L:j/'~ ,~ \
...............an.-..... ~i-rb Bcb ~ \\ ",'" II '\. \
......... a...4:.-1.... - to cr.. III - \ .I~ 1~.1 I ~--l"
_. 1"1 \~_...'-~....-J -...-:' ~- \
: :::"::'.:= _" I~.l~~-<$~~" q
~c..~.___-aDllftl r:::y.~ Jt---11 I r-r'~ \~' ^~. ..,
~~...,-..o.nct I ~,'t;- \\ \ ! - ,--.., ,,\<:~~~/ -!I \
RntA-&l..........,-..o.nct :r---.J.. f,\ \ L--:C'\ ~"'i, \......,'j - I
VI..LAGE CENTER II .... r..~4( _.~ \~.;, \ \ \ "~", :'\ ~ .;;" \.
~-' ....c--_ Ill._-,Ir~ \<-1, It- . ~ ~~j
YC-2 ....c--.. ~ ~ vln..\~ \ \ I ,,~;]:\:::.,\.., ,\
VC-I ..... c... - eM! "'~.~ V /~// \ \\.
IlJSItESS ~ V;,..... ~-1.~~~ "i!fr~\
~ ...... c... - ~ '-II ClIIa'Ict ",' ,,' - A.... ~ ,,'"
~ ....... c... - ....~,., ...... DIIIItII -~, '., .....~
'" ---..........
---~
--
:::::::
, ..-
8'ECW. fI\.AIOSE
c.-. .... - 1 ........
..... .... - . .....
GIIR.... -.....
GIIR .... - . ........
..... .... - . ........
0.. .... - . ........
01-., _....-,_
. .., .... ..... DIIIItII
LIGIND
}';: '@!;ti!("%JliMli;f ,ro,...' ......... c......
EXHIBIT F
/.1
/- \
....;; ..::;...
-..--
=::-..:.~ -....,
rJ~
,.,.... ~
1110/11
..4 FASTLAKE
A flLNHD CCM4NITY f( EASTLNCE DEVB..OfMNT co.
l-
ATI'ACHMENT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES
AND
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-96-07
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE
AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE II (EASTLAKE I EXPANSION)
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN, PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PL~~, WATER
CONSERVATION PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN.
WHEREAS, applications for amendments to the EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion)
General Development Plan (GDP), EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA), Planned
Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water
Conservation and Public Facilities Financing Plan ("Project") were filed with the City of Chula
Vista Planning Department on September 12, 1995, by EastLake Development Company
(Developer); and,
WHEREAS, the propose GDP and SPA Plan Amendments consist of relocating two
neighborhood park sites (Parcels P-3 and P-5), expanding the area available for community
purpose facilities (PQ), adjusting land use designation boundaries, transferring densities and
designating Parcel R-26 for low income housing in accordance with the recently adopted
EastLake Affordable Housing ;-'rogram and EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Agreement;
and,
WHEREAS, the Plannirg Director set the time and place for a hearing on said Project
and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by it publication in a newspaper
of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the
exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new or
supplemental EIR is necessary, and has prepared an addendum to FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake
Greens, which must be consider by the Planning Commission prior to a decision on this project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
DOES hereby find that the addendum FSEIR-86-04 (B), EastLake Greens, has been prepared
in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR
guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Ordinance and Resolution approving
the project in accordance with the fmdings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this November 29, 1995 by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Davis, Ray, Salas, Tarantino, Thomas, Willett.
NOES:
ABSENT:
Chair Tuchscher
A TIEST:
John C. Ray
Vice-Chairman
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
m: \home \planning\luis\PCM -9607.RES
/;
Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes of 11/29/95
ITEM 3.
PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-96-07; CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO
THE EASTLAKE II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (EASTLAKE I
EXTENSION), EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA),
PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS, AIR QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PLAN, WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND PUBLIC
FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
Acting Senior Planner Hernandez presented the staff report. Commissioner Salas questioned the
number of dwelling units per acre. Mr. Hernandez stated that the Medium High density ranges
from 11 to 18 units per acre.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing
to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MS (Willett/Thomas) to adopt Resolution PCM-96-07 recommending that the City Council
approve the proposal in accordance with the draft City Council Resolution and Ordinance
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
Vice Chair Ray noted that the usable acreage was 1.37 because of the existing water tank and
acreage designated as an easement. Mr. Hernandez concurred.
Assistant Planning Director Lee stated that the easement could potentially be used for parking;
it was not entirely wasted. Mr. Hernandez had pointed out that the net usable acres complied
with the City standard.
Commissioner Salas stated that property currently being planned as part of the Otay Ranch
project west of SR-125 may require the extension of Palomar Road to connect to EastLake
. Parkway between the parcels. She asked if that was being coordinated between the two
developers.
Mr. Lee replied that it was being coordinated and was a very significant issue because of the
importance of crossing the freeway. Baldwin recognized that because of the location of the high
school and the library, not having the crossing at that location would force the people on the
west side of the freeway to go to Telegraph Canyon Road or Orange Avenue. Staff felt the
crossing was very important and EastLake had concurred with that.
VOTE:
6-0 (Chair Tuchscher excused) to approve.
ATTACHMENT 4
FSEIR-86-04 (B) ADDENDUM
, ./ .:)
SECOND ADDENDUM TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
FSEIR 86-04 (B)
PROJECT NAME: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
PROJECT LOCATION: Various parcels within the EastLake Grens SPA between Hunte
Parkway and the future SR-12S Row north of the future E. Orange
Ave.
I. INTRODUCTION
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental
Review Coordinator (ERe) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or
Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present:
1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion
of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration that have not created any new
significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or
Negative Declaration; or .
2. Changes in circumstances, additional or refined information available since
completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential
environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives
available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show
that the project will have or more significant impacts which were not previously
addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration.
3. The changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise new issues about the
significant effects on the environment.
D. PROPOSED PROJECT REVISIONS
The Amendments proposed can be grouped in the following general categories:
1. Park Relocations
2. Density Transfers and Parcel Boundary Adjustments
3. Removal of Interim Designation on Parcel R-26
1. Park Relocations
The Neighborhood Park (parcel P-3) in the adopted plan was partially within the
SDG&E easement and contained less than ten acres of net useable acres for park
use. The park is proposed by this amendment to be relocated southeasterly of
/'"
4;
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
2
Parcel R-20 and to contain 10.0 acres net useable for park uses (11.8 acres
gross). This relocation deletes former residential Parcel R-21. The former
location of the park is proposed to be converted to Public/Quasi-Public as an
expansion of existing Parcel PQ-2. This additional 11.0 acres will be available
for Community Purpose Facilities.
A second park relocation involves Parcel P-S, which was 3 Private Neighborhood
Park between Parcels R-20 and R-21. This park is proposed to be relocated near
the intersection of South Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway adjacent to Parcel
R-12. No significant change in acreage is proposed.
2. Density Transfers and Boundary Adjustments
Reductions in densities are proposed in eleven residential parcels. Increases in
densities are proposed in four residential parcels. The net result of these density
transfers is a 133 unit decrease in the overall residential density. Most of the
density transfers are minor adjustments that reflect units achieved in the tract map
and design review process. The following parcels are proposed to be changed in
a more substantive way (more than 10 du):
Parcel
Proposed Chan~e
R-6
R-16
R-20
R-21
R-23
R-26
-12
+26
-37
-120
-142
+ 200 (The Adopted Plan provided this
parcel with an interim density.)
Boundary adjustments occur primarily as a result of Park relocations and are
proposed to be reflected in the amended Tentative Tract Map. These adjustments
result in a net loss of 11.8 acres of residential land. An increase of 11.0 acres
has been added as Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) and the remaining 0.8 acres has been
added as Park.
The following shows the existing and proposed changes in land use and acreage
on the General Development Plan.
" / Y
Sea>nd Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
3
Existina Proposed .'
RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL
L8nd Use Acres dullc Unit. L8nd Use ACtGli clullC Unit.
!~ 250.5 C).3 143 !~ 250.1 C).3 143
LM LDwIMedIum _,8 o.e 2008 LM LowNedUn .'.0 o.e 1803
M MecIium 242.2 .". 1875 M MecIium 251.1 .". 2D23
MH Mldium'Hl;h 125,~ 11.1e. 1884 MH~ 100.0 11-11. 1S48
H High 11,0 18-27+ 250 H High 2~,S 11-27+ 110
a~ Teal 1018,7 1660 .. TataI 1006.8 IS27
NON-RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres Land Use Acres
Retail 61.8 RetaU 11.8
Prof. & Admin. e.B Prof. & AdmIn. '.1
Res. & Ud, Mfgr. 135.8 Res. & Ltd. Mfgr, 135.1
Open Space 187.6 Open apace t17.I
Public/Quasi-Pub. 137.8 PubliclQuasi-Pub, t..8
Paries & Ree, ~.~ Paries & Rae. 286.2
Major Circulltion 21".7 Major Ci'cuIation 21".7
Su~ Total , 030.2 a~TCltaI 1042.0
I!:[:JFuture Urtlan 72.9 I![:]Future Uan 72,8
Project Totals 2121.8 e660 Project T otaII '2121.1 1527
3. Removal of Interim Designation for Parcel R-26
Parcel R-26 was given an Interim Designation on the Adopted SPA Plan. This
designation indicated that the density of 4.5 du/ac would be subject to future
amendment to reflect the Chula Vista General Plan. The Interim Designation was
assigned to allow an Affordable Housing Program for all of East1ake to be
developed. This program has proceeded and has designated this parcel as a site
to implement a portion of the Chula Vista Housing Element requirement for
Affordable Housing. The increase in density is proposed to allow this program
to be implemented.
, ~--
,/ ;
,
General
Development
Plan
...4. do I)t.ed
RESIDENTIAl.
w.x.
LIH) USE ACJlES o.vAC ~
L ~ 2IQ.& ~3 '''3
LM Low'........ IIU ... 100I
M ....... 2"U ..." "7! ~
... ~ '254 "-11 ,....
H ~ ".0 '..27. 150
~T'" 1011.7 ..&0
N)'Ij -RESDENTlAL.
LIH) LIE ACFlES
~- ...
c-o "'J_.a u
-..._-
toR =~~ '36.1
~-- ",.
fIO N:&J~ '37,'
, ....... a ~ 1M"
"JlI' ClrcUIlIlln 2147
b-T.. ,030.2
G:J "*" '"- 12.l1
""-' t_ 1121.1 ac "'0 ...
. ~.. -......
...-.......--..-----
..-------
~ E'ASTLAKE
A PLANNED cow.1lNlTY BY EASTLAKE ~ co.
~tmi~
I.Mld 'lMninl l J
.........-...... ~ ~
~.~_.-
- l
Exhibit 1
.
General
Development
Plan
PrOI)Osed
M1:.1
.
i
.
,
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres du/lC Units
I Low
LM LowJMedium
M Medium
MH MediumlHigh
H High
S~ Total
250,5 0..3 743
381.0 o.e 1803
251.1 6-11. 2023
100.0 11.18, 1348
2<4.3 18-27+ 510
1006.~ 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
Retail 51,~
Prof, & Admin, e,8
Res & Ltd. Mfgr, 135,~
Open Space 187.6
Public/QUIlIi-Pub. 148,;
Parka & Rec, ~.2
Major Circulltion 21<4.7
Sub-Total 1042.0
[[:JFuture Urtlan 72.~
Project TataIs 2121.8 e527
.,-"_-
...-.....---.-----
...-------
..1 fASTLAKE
A ~ ~lTY BY EASTLAKE ClEV'ELOFMNT CO.
~imi~
Land "./IIIina l i
.......-....... ~ ....
r-.~_.._
IllOft'
,/
..~,
Exhibit 1
Z~ .1 i
<( ..... Jj,.O..""lDol""e...."'NID"""'.....eeo-.elDo.o -
.". "".OOOIDO ..ID..OOO-."".N._.......O ~
........ ....... ~ N" ,............ N Ii
I ,...,
.... .....'1
0.. .::. II
";.:: I "':"':C!f'!.."":...f'!~C!lI'!f'!lI'!..lII!C\!....f'!C!"":f'!t\o!lI'!lI'!GI!.. i
~: NNon..ononononon.......on.........O.Nftft.O....
Z ~;~ - --- - "
c:> J .........oo......on..fte.won..........o..o.ft._ !
1-- ..-.~~O..~..N--O~..~oo~~~".. ~
~ --NNN--- .--N--- ----- _ .
N
-
...J
i=
::::>
ft.NO-OOonO.-..ft...-
=~.'!~";."N--~..~i~
-
I on on on on on on on on on on on on on onon on on on on on on on
~~~~~P""""""""""''''''''''''''''''''''~''
'OOOOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~
Sl
a; II QQQQQQQCQQQQQQQ~~~~~~~~~~QQ~
; 'I) · O-Nf')..."ID.....O-,.....,..."ID....1D I
~ j I ;:m:~:m;;;;;;;;:.:..:~:. j
-
C/)~~~~
.,,' ~~ ~
"~ I ~
/l · \ ~
..... I , ~_
-
Ii:
.
-
fh
t.4~
.! ~-
! !;
/?
-".'
E~ I c
:!
~I .J.
i .-I~~ oS
111 .
- .
t- L
II)
N
.1
co)'tl
1.1
I) f
1,1
II,
J'
II' J
: II
J ~ I
~~j!
W'6
IJJ iz
~c
~(!)
~
Z ,,:::: It i
~ ~ · ~il~~il~'~=I;~:~~~ lll~'~ii;n III
........ ~lftt --- C'llI -- .. iN --- -- N t
-' 2;.
CL C:..l i
~I I ~~~..~.~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~.~~. i
4 NN....~~~~.~~O~~-~'-ft..... .
...1. -- - - --
Z..... ·
c:> ~l i
lei: I ;mam=i;;=;~!i:~ ~;=;:;; E
~ I """"'''''''~!!~~!!~!!~!!!!~==~~ =~~~Ift!!
__ OOOOO.~~__~__~~_~~~~.e~~~o-
-
.....
::>
J .~"!Cl!~~.~~~"":~.~~~~~
.~:~~ft:.ftN~-~..~I~
-
lie
IIQQQCQQQCQQQQQQQQ~QQ~ QeQQ~Q~
CCCCC ccccc C
~ )i , '
~ ~~~.~e~e~!~~:~~~~~gN~~~~~~~
~ lj..U........................ J
i I ill.
-
2
i
,.. ,
.',
-:,r
E.., I
..J.
~u~
I
I,! 1
III I
1'1 I
IJ I t
Jt ·
ii II' s I
I ~ : t I ·
if J ~ol
i
!
C\I
COIf!
C')i
IJJ~ Jil
~zl~
Wj6
LIJ !
~c
i:;5<J)
~
r;-;,
~!'~ \ - j. ~
'-.: " _ ~.,.::,
.. ,~..;-/-/ I' , ==-"=".::
~ ..' -~,...,,-/ ( .... --_.
\~~~" ~"Y:~~' ,~II
,\ r;; \ "// ~~'\ -- ,,~
\... ~- ~ /I/~ " :00.- 'I
~,\ /,/ ~ It/t~ -- "~ "
. . ~v t7_,(;.'-1~ <<, #~...~ \~\ ... J -
I \...1."".... /~ V1 ), " '1r- ...Il~ J
\ ~ -, ~-~Z -:: '-te- \~JL~~~ h~
(;;1' '-F--U)" -"\ \"'~~ ~~~-=t
..' .v~ - ,~ -- ~} - ... '\\ :: '\~ )\.,\\7 _ ~ =.::.~
~.., I \ \\_. ~- ... ,,~ ~,
~;? -- --.... ~ I\)
\ L.~(~U,/-~~"~-/.i
1.......:11>..:'....... III I /~~ ,,/1 ,)}.(I
.. ~\ _ I I // 7~ "~/ ~ ..,
T?/'t:t. ,'b k?' I li~ -" ~
~~:- II /.................I/..:::::/~....... ?,,-~ I ~ \~...'Y::)r...,
, 1/ 1""1("', '-....... /'I J' I I -~"....:=- -' [" \
: I ~ u-;\ ~......, I "-..11 ~
......... a.....4A... _ to .... II!I'" \ \-..\~, I L..I II ... --i'1 \
".f.'1 \ ~_...~ ~ -J - ...-::it I r::- \
.......,...... c:.w.t -. ClIIetct ,. ~'I ~ -...... ('... ~ ~ _
...., c...... .L.... - 1. ~ ... "\ 11""'11) ~~ .....;; \ ..................;K' I
~c...~._.I:.IIl.aDllftl f\y If-il I r-, '~. I\~ ^ : ..,
- T ...., ..........., - . o.nct 6 ,\:, /- \\ " I -, l~.." \.,,- ~ /' ~;
R · .............,-..Dlntc1 :P-.:"'i f\\ \ ~', ~~,.~~ -.. /; ... I
/11- / \\ \ ~.... \ , \""" ' (
;1 -. \. (..,,\\~,...- ~ '\ \ 'I ~"''-~v':'';'''''~ J
11&. ,r-c-', , ~. : I - U-~ ~
~ J,.." -, I " ~.., \ \ II ,/ //""}/ \ \ .., \\
V ~ ' ~ V\""L...;"/""#\--,,
... ~ ./ // ,)\..
~,-" "~~!t4-'~\
'" 8JStESS CENTER '\..' /"{;....-f=:- ~ ~\h
I K-, 1"-' c... - ....~.... """ ~ ";"'~'" f!'A ...;
K-2 ___ c... - .......""...... o..tet ~,....-"'d'
flU _~
.,. _ .;;ii"~
-~~
Land Use
Districts
A~dol)ted
___.... -1....
~ __ -I DIIftl
~....."~ - 'DIIftl
__... ...... c..- -.....
::::::
AESIDENllAL.
., .
VIJ..AGE CENTER
~' .... c.... - _
VC-2 .... c- - ...
vc-a .... 0... - ....
-..:-
. ~.1. P\.fFOSE
'-....-t_
0......-._
0......-._
0......-._
0......-._
0.. .... -. ....
...... - ,....
.... ..... o..tet
./', //
--..-....
-..--,
-..--
=:..~
CJ~-'-'
?... ~
Exhibit A
~E4STLAKE
A fllNHD ect.MNTY It' EASn.AICE DEVB.OFMNT co.
r;-;
~!'~ ~ - j~~
'-.: " . ~ ..:=lfl....... '1/
,~..;-/-/ I '. ...--...
\~~~ \"-'~~'~:~~~' - I[==-
\ \ - o~~ ~~~'\~
\\~ '0J f~ -IJ1?t~ ~~' - ~
~ ~ ~~? /~ _ '.)1 .\~ eH ~I ... I'"
-, ~.?Z -.: I.~ ~J(~~~ h- --
(;:1'~) -, \~" ~~~:=t
":r~ - ~t - \ \ \'"':"~ "\\ \ 1 ..,
,,~ j/ -\ -. \~, ...~.~\ - ~ =--
... I \ - \\ _.~)?~~... ~ '"7\\
J\ ~(~~/~~"~.//
.. I ~ nJ rr ~~ ",~", //) 7~ ...
,., /tt I 11/ I k~ " / ~ -" ~
I;' ./ --.... 'ko-,;;o-- I I ~/ ,-' }
'- ~- II I .........1 (.... /1< - ,,-........1 I ~ \.-...~;r-,
- I' / I ;"";l" \-/,"'- i"J; -~ '" -=- -1 r \
., ...... ,..., - , DIIftl II I r--; I ,~,..-...., I '--I I ,~
.............0...-._ II '\\-..11 _, / L.I (/ ... ~\ \
III'" II--.:..: I .-/ ~ I
.......a..._.L.-,-tO.... "'~;I \~_...'-~....-J _ ---::it I ~_ .,
-----...... c..c"t - D DIIftl I I ~-,r ~ -, ('....,..!! ~ -
""-M_'" c..A 1...... - 11 o.nct ..." 11tC."11]) ~h~ ~ \ ...........,../~
[ r\. ... J}--1I I ,.... - r' -- ,\::'\ - ~ ..,
~=-:=::= 6 \.~'I-- \\ I, ( _7 l~_;\\ \./'~~ //"-i; \
n _n' -r\\ ,---,' "" I
~~~....,-..~ :r---.::iVC.3) \\ \- /'\', \'~. \~ ..... .I( ... I
Il =. - Il: ,~,g~'\?,: \ I, ) - ~'-~';~~~J
Wl:-. ~ c...r - ... ~ J,.. -, ( ~", ~ _7 \ \ i J ",-,/r;/\..~\ \ _7 '\
Wl:-I .... 0.... _ .... "V ~ V 08.4 ~ V'-L./ / ",,#\ -.. \\
", ~ ./ ,h// \ }~
8JSNESS CENTER -V, "8-1 ~..l.~~ ~~\ 'v
" r... ~. ~
I K-, I..... c... - .......... ... ... ~", (' "A
lie-I ___ c...r -....,...... ...... DIIIWl >-~' .,':~d'
flU ~~
".. -~--
::::;---
Land Use
Districts
PrOI)Osed
&I __ -I DIIftl
::::::
AESIDENT1AL
--....... -.....
.,;..
8F'ECW.. P\AlOSE
~, '- .... - t .....
0.- .... -. .....
0.- .... -......
0.- .... - ......
0.. .... - . .....
0.. .... - . .....
0......-,_
......... ......
~E4STLAKE
A fIlNHD ccr.M.NTY If EAST1.AICE DEVB.OfMNf co
----..
____I
----
=--~~_&_t
rJ~
M.... ~
1110/11
Exhibit A
Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B)
ID. CHANGES IN IMPACT ANALYSIS
4
The proj~t site has be graded for sometime and this minor shift in land uses and minor
modifications to densities will not result in any change in the natural environment. the
provision of public facilities was programmed in the original EastLake GDP/SPA at a
specific density. The minor reduction and density shifts that part of this proposal would
not significantly impact the' provision of these services. dle minor reduction in
population would result in a commensuration reduction in related impacts.
IV. CONCLUSION
~
Pursuant to S~tion 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above
discussion, I hereby find that the proj~t revisions to the proposed proj~t will result in
only minor t~hnical changes or additions which are necessary to make the previously
sited FEIR adequate under CEQA.
V. REFERENCES
EIR .96-04 EastLake Greens
EIR-96-04 (A) Addendum
IS-96-04 EastLake Greens GP A/SP A Modification
General Plan, City of Chula Vista
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures
/'
~ --,'
...1)rnif'Ofrn f('l COll\lIlU/1if~ gr~Li('(
105t!> JAMACHA BOULEVARD, SPRING ~y, CAliFORNIA 11m
TELEPHONE 170-2222, AREA CODE al8
I;,..~
, ~ - r.-.
"... :.... :.~ ,.""...
, ',"- r-.
...-.", .
OCTo
~ 199t;
/:J -
(,4:\.'1
~
VIA FAX "1-5171
, U.8. .ai1
1995
Mr. Douglas D. R~id
Environmental Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912-1087
.ez propo.ed Amendment to the Adopted .a.tLake II General
Development Plan (GDP), .elated to the .a.tLake Green.
and an Amendment to the 8PA Plan, and the Tentative Tract
Hap (IS-"-05).
Dear Mr. Reid:
The otay Water District (OWO) would like to have ample opportu-
nity to review and respond to any environmental documentation
(Negative Declaration or EIR) relating to the above referenced
project.
OWO may have site needs fo~ the future 711-3 reservoir and other
water facilities as well, thus requiring the site(s)'and pipeline
routes to be called out on any adopted EastLake II General
Development Plan (GOP).
Please contact me at 670-2293 or John Garcia at 670-2213 if you
need any information or have any questions with regard to water
facilities or service. We look forward to reviewing and res-
ponding to your completed environmental Initial study/Negative
Declaration or Draft EIR.
Sincerely,
~ f)7c4
Michael F. c:6eman, AICP
Environmental Specialist
MFC:cp
cc: Tim Stanton
Jim Peasley
John Garcia
Chris Craven
Rebecca Patton
~
.
Sweetwater Union Hleh School District
AdminIstration Center
11 30 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91911-2896
(619)691-5500 ..;:".- .
DIvision of Punnlnr Jnd FJdlldes
Ms. Barbara ReId
City of Chula Vista
PlannIng Departm~nt
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. ReId:
Re: Proposed East/3ke Gener31 Development P/3n Ch3nges
The Sweetwater UnIon High School District does not object to the proposed
amendments to the EastLake II General Dev~lopment Plan. Community Facilities
District No. 1 (CFD No.1) was established to mitigate this project's Impacts to
schools. However, thank you for the notification, It Is good that the district Is kept
Informed of these changes.
Thomas Sliva
Director of Planning
TS/ml
/'~
ATTACHMENT 5
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
/-,
./ "'-:..
. ,
10/17/1995 e9:16
6196915171
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PAGE 84
. .
nO! ern' OP ai'UI.A VJSTA DISQ.OSUU rJ'ATBMENT
" e required to Ole I Statement nr DlKlosurc of Clenaln ownership or ftnanetll lnterall, paymCftll, or mmpatln
( . ",u(lonl, on III miners which will r.qulre dilcrctionlry Ictlon Oft the plrt of the City Counetl, Plannln, Commlllion. Ind
III other omctal bodlea. The foUowin, Inform.lion mUSl bt dilcloWS:
1. Ustthe "Imea of III pcrwlU "Ivlnal ftnlnctll Inleral In the propert)'whlch II the lubJect or the .ppllcatlon or the
IIOlunct, &.1., owner, applicant, ClOntraetof, lubc:oDtrlctOr, II\Itertlt supplier. ·
. .
EASTLAD DEVELOPKENT COMPARY
2. ar Iny perlOn - Idenllned pU"\llnt to (1) above II . =rpontlon or pannerlblp, list the MIft. or III IndMduall GWIlln,
more tblft 10~ or the shira In the corporation or ownln,an)' pannershlp Iftllfat In the partnenhlp.
BOSVELL PROPERTIES INCORPORATED
THE TULAGO COMPANY
3. II In)' penon- Identlncd pursuant 10 (I) Ibow Is non.prone or,lnlution or I trult. llat tbe nlmel of In)' penoD
"rvln. u director of the flon.pront orllniuUoft or u trustee or bcneftdary or trustor or the trUlt.
'RIA
4. Hive you hid more thin S1Sa wofth of buslncu tnnucted witb any mtmber or the City Itl<<, Boarda, Commlsalonl,
Committees, and Council within the put twelve months' Va_ No~ If yes. please 1!\dIClte person(I):
5. 'Iwe Identify each ind every person. tncludlnJ any Ilents, cmploytCl. coftluhlntl. or IndependeDt contractors wIlo
you hive uslgned to represent you before ttlc Ch1 tn thll mati cr.
CArY Cinti. Cinti Land PlauniuR
.
Gail CTocenzi, Ea8~Lake Develop1len~ Co.
RoRer ~hAtiA. tick EnRiueeriuR
~ill Olltrem. EAstLalte Develoftlent Co.
6. Have,au and/Or ~"r omccn or IJCftU. 'n tM lurtl.ta,llOfttrlbut" more thall '1,000 to a Couftdlmember In 'he
current or precedin& election period? V__ No_ I',.. ItllI wblch CDuftdlmemb&r(&):
. · · (NOTB: At&d 1ddI&louJ.....
.
f\.te: /0- t r ~e;~
ftt
r..i' r.~ft~.~~i_ A..i.t.~~ Pro1f!e~ HanaReT
Print or type Dlnte of IIODtractot/lppUClDt
. tER1" *flMI et: -A..,.....,.,.'",'" - ,....... lOiN.....,.,. .. r rIM"-.-J cWo""'" .....I..r.., -pol" ........ ~...",..
fItII .vI .., "'11III'I'1. dty -.4 ,..,.". dIy ".""...1iIy, .. or .,..,.uc" atd.~ .,,,,, "., ,." ., .......,,- ... · · .--
<.
ATTACHMENT 6
EASTLAKE PARK ISSUES REPORT
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
7
EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion)
Planned Community Zone
General Development Plan
Approved by the Chula Vista City Council
Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994
Proposed Amendment - Strikeout/Redline Version
October 9, 1995
,...,.-..-.....".....,........:.........,......'
Text Added
Text Deleted
EastLake Development Company
Chula Vista, California
(619) 421-0127
Prepared by:
Cinti Land Planning
San Diego, California
(619) 223-7408
General Development Plan Text
A. Purpose and scope
The EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community Zone
is established in accordance with Chapter 19.48 of the Chula
vista Municipal Code and applies to the property indicated on
the General Development Plan Map. Upon adoption, this text
and the included exhibits shall be the General Development
Plan for the EastLake II Planned Community Zone.
The purpose of this General Development Plan (GDP) is to
provide for the orderly pre-planning and long-term development
of the area identified as EastLake II through the use of the
Planned Community (PC) Zone as administered by the city of
Chula vista. This project is an expansion of the EastLake I
General Development/SPA Plan area to incorporate the territory
proposed for the next development increment in the EastLake
Planned community. Given the scale of the project, the detail
presented in this document is limited. More detailed planning
will be completed and approved at the "neighborhood" level in
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plans.
Two SPAs are designated in this plan: EastLake Greens and
EastLake Trails. Each SPA plan will provide detailed planning
information as well as specific community design, public
facility financing and development standards tailored to the
proposed uses and site characteristics of the individual
planning area. The SPA Plan for EastLake Greens is being
processed concurrently with this General Development Plan
while the EastLake Trails SPA will be submitted at a later
date. Construction within each SPA will be phased in accor-
dance with phasing plans formulated in conjunction with the
SPA planning process.
B. Background and setting
The EastLake Planned Community site is a contiguous parcel of
land in eastern Chula vista. The purpose of this General
Development Plan is to implement the city's General Plan and
extend the comprehensive planning concepts and high quality
development standards established in the current phases of
planning and development, EastLake I, to EastLake II (i.e.,
EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails), the next major develop-
ment phase for the overall community.
with the adoption of the original EastLake Plan in August,
1982, the General Plan for EastLake I, which includes approx-
imately forty percent of the property, was established as the
EastLake I General Development Plan and PC District Regula-
tions. At this time, the balance of the EastLake Planned
community was identified as "Future Urban" on the City' s
General Plan Map. A notation on the map referenced a special
(8/ 16/94 )r,(~QI919S) 2,
,/ - ~
1 j /
set of land use and planning policies known as the EastLake
Policy Plan. Subsequently, EastLake I was annexed to the
City, a sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and tract maps were
approved I and construction commenced in the area north of
Telegraph Canyon Road. The balance of EastLake remained in
unincorporated territory, but within the official Sphere of
Influence and Planning Area of the city.
The second major increment of the EastLake community is the
planning of the EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails neigh-
borhoods, located east of the proposed alignment of SR-125,
between Telegraph Canyon Road and Orange Avenue. Admini-
strati vely, this is to be accomplished by expanding the
EastLake I PC. to include the proposed development areas.
This second phase has been commonly known as "EastLake 11"
although it contained only a portion of the area originally
identified as EastLake II in 1982.
The 1994 General Development Plan Amendment
All of the original EastLake property has been annexed to the
City. EastLake made an exchange of property with the Otay
Ranch known as the Land Swap Property. This proposed amendment
is intended to incorporate a portion of the Land Swap (22.7
acres) into the EastLake Greens SPA for annexation to the City
of Chula vista. The balance of the Land Swap Property is
intended to be the subject of a future action.
The EastLake Greens SPA was originally proposed to contain
five parcels for higher density housing. These parcels were
given an interim density designation in the SPA approval
process. This amendment intends to revise these interim
designations and maintain the overall community character.
TbeProposed 1995 Amendment
.,-".',-"-.,_.,,...,-.,-., ,'-' ........ ',,', ".c-........,......... -.','_. .... ......._ _.,-" ," .... ..
'I:'l1Jsamendment proposes to relocate onepublic.and one pJ:"ivate
pa+~ ':' in :.thesouthern part. of EastLake..Greenstc;>:creat,emore
~S?eableparksites.'As a result'of theseparkr~l()catioJ1s,;orie
~~sidentiaF.parcel .has been' eliminated:and'apubliclqucfsi-
pub.lic'~itei was: enlarged. '.These. changes: will:' redl,lcE(.the
r.esidential'densi ty in EastLake Greens. by' 133 its:. ':'. Density
transfers and . boundary adjustments have beepr'Oposedasua
result of these changes. One density transfer of. significance
3.s'theconversion of a parcel south of" the EastLakeHi.gh
SCh661 . from its "Interim Designation~ toa.permarient'desrgria~
t16n:of'MediUm~High, which is consistent with the. General Plan
'(Q':t;' , this parcel. No changes to existingcondi tion.sare
p;t:oposed in the northern portion of EastLake Greens, EastLake
~r~il~ or Ea.stLake I Planning Areas ~ .. ... ..
c. site Description
(8/16/94) tCr.O]91$S)
:3-,
The project site is generally comprised of gently rolling
topography with the Salt Creek corridor forming the predomi-
nate geographic feature. The rounded features of the site
reflect the years of plowing and discing associated with its
historical dry farming use. Localized views to Salt Creek and
adjacent hillsides available from hillside locations. The
range in elevation is approximately 100 feet from the creekbed
to hilltop.
Salt Creek is also the significant natural resource on the
site. It has been identified as an environmentally sensitive
area because of its biological and wildlife habitat value, and
aesthetic value. The original EastLake ErR (EIR 81-03)
included a biological survey of the area. The survey identi-
fied sensitive resources within Salt Creek and in the south-
ernmost portions of the site. No significant archaeological
or cultural resources have been identified in several surveys
of the project site. Currently, adjacent properties are also
utilized for dry farming.
D. General Development Plan
Land Use
The General Development Plan for the project consists of an
expansion of the area included in the EastLake I General
Development Plan and a conversion of the land use and density
categories used in that exhibit to those used in the General
Plan Update.
North of Telegraph Canyon Road, no changes to land use or
density are proposed. The General Development Plan only
converts the currently approved development to the new land
use/density categories. South of Telegraph Canyon Road,
specific land use/density categories will be assigned to the
EastLake I area originally designated "Future Urban".
specific categories will also assigned within the expansion
area. circulation Element roadways will also be designated
within the expansion area. All designations are consistent
with the implementing policies of the General Plan Update.
The Circulation Element amendment proposes a change in the
alignments of Orange Avenue and Otay Lakes Road (Telegraph
Canyon Road). The addition of two maj or roads, EastLake
Parkway and Hunte Parkway, to the planned circulation system
of the area is also proposed. These are depicted on the
Proposed General Development Plan exhibit.
The proposed General Development Plan designates a wide range
of residential densities, residential support uses, commercial
and employment uses. Residential support uses are found
within the PUblic/Quasi-Public (PQ) category. These uses
include schools, utility sites, hospital/medical center and
(8/16/94 )'(l.07~/95)
4-
/
other community facilities. Several of the PQ parcels have
been identified as candidate church sites. The project
proposes a total of 10.8 gross acres for church site use (4.0
ac. within EastLake I Village Center and 6.8 ac. within
EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails). This acreage could
provide sites for 3 to 5 churches, depending on congregation
size and the inclusion of day care facilities. Should
additional PQ designated acreage be not utilized for other
needed pUblic/quasi-public facilities, it could be available
for church uses.
Planned Community Zone
The General Development Plan is a required component of the
Planned Community District permitted by the Chula Vista Zoning
Code. As mentioned above, the EastLake I PC was adopted in
1982. This PC District was amended with the approval of the
EastLake I sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan in 1985. This
amendment will expand the district to include the entire
EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails areas. At that time, no
land use districts, except a 14.9 acre park parcel in the OS-4
district, were established for the area south of Telegraph
Canyon Road. The Eastlake I General Development Plan indi-
cates a Future Residential classification and 1,299 dwelling
units on 320.7 acres in this area. The revised plan will not
substanti vely affect the development approved in the area
north of Telegraph Canyon Road. The proposed General Develop-
ment Plan incorporates the EastLake I expansion area and shows
a variety of land uses and a range of residential-densities.
The area has been enlarged by 831.2 acres and a maximum of
3,570 additional residential units are proposed. (an addi-
tional 2,735 units using interim designations). other major
uses include a High School, a Community Park, two Elementary
School sites, a Golf Course associated with the residential
development within EastLake Greens, and an Equestrian Center
associated with EastLake Trails.
1994 Amendment
The 1994 amendment added 22.7 acres of area to the Planned
Community Zone. This additional area will be annexed to the
City of Chula vista.
Development Regulations
with respect to development standards and use regulations, the
amended Planned Community Zoning Regulations, which are
adopted as an integral companion to each SPA Plan, provide
detailed standards that are applicable to each parcel of land.
The General Development Plan for the EastLake II (expanded
EastLake I) PC District is included in the EastLake Greens SPA
Plan. The area identified as EastLake Trails shall have a SPA
Plan including the same or similar regulations approved prior
to development.
(8/16/94 )'(1019/95)
s:..
"
D. Plan summary
1. Description
The proposed project consists of two residential neigh-
borhoods: EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails. The
project includes sites for necessary public facilities
including a high school, two community parks and two
elementary school sites to be shared with the project to
the north.
Detailed development policies, standards and programs
shall be provided in subsequent SPA Plans to assure
well-planned, quality development, conservation of
important on-site resources and provision of adequate and
timely public services and facility improvements to serve
the project.
(8/16/94 HIQI9/Q,S >:
'6
/.
,
2. statistical Summary
The following statistics are from the EastLake II
(EastLake I expansion) General Development Plan Map.
Table A
Combined EastLake I and EastLake I Expansion Areal
AS;
Density
Max. DU
Residential Uses
Low
Low/Medium
Medium
Medium/High
High
250.5
.381. 0389.6
251.1242.2
115.312S.4
11. 0
0-3 du/ac
3-6
6-11
11-18
18-27+
743
ZOOS-1~',():,j
~2()?'3
~J,.~,Q?
250
Total Residential
.~008. 91018.7
~!?-6-;-tt avg.
~~.,$,?7
Non-Residential
Retail
Professional &
Administrative
Research & Limited
Manufacturing
Open Space
PUblic/Quasi-Public
Parks & Recreation
Major circulation
51.9
6.8
135.9
187.6
137 . 914 6.: 9
29:;.4296.2
214.7
Total Non-Residential
1030.21040.0
Future Urban
72.9
PROJECT TOTALS
2121. 8
~ avg. 1
3.1
~du
6527
1 Excludes Future Urban acreage in calculation.
(8/16/94)UO/9j9S)
-:7
Table B
EastLake Greens/Activity corridor SPA1
Residential Uses
Low
Low/Medium
Medium
Medium/High
High
Total Residential
Non-Residential
Retail
Professional &
Administrative
Research & Limited
Manufacturing
Open Space
PUblic/Quasi-Public
Parks & Recreation
Major Circulation
Total Non-Residential
Future Urban
PROJECT TOTALS
A.C
34.4
183.9192. :J
,170.<5161. 6
46.35-6-;-4-
0.0
435.1444.9
19.6
0.0
0.0
22.0
~ 85.3
197.0197.8
87.1
402.0411.8
6.3
853.2
Density
0-3 du/ac
3-6
6-11
11-18
18-27+
6~3"6-;-5 avg.
Max. DU
117
86~%5
1122?1:H-T
~,;3~6UH
o
27:3&-z-sTr
3.2-3-;-4- avg. 1 ;?;Z~'?-z-sTr du
1 Excludes Future Urban acreage in calculation.
(8/16/94 )!().QI9Z~?)
8
Table C
EastLake Trails SPA
Residential Uses
Low
Low/Medium
Medium
Medium/High
High
Total Residential
Non-Residential
Retail
Professional &
Administrative
Research & Limited
Manufacturing
Open Space
PUblic/Quasi-Public
Parks & Recreation
Major Circulation
Total Non-Residential
Future Urban (north of
Telegraph Canyon Road)
PROJECT TOTALS
M;.
Density
Max. DU
54.4
107.5
21.7
13.8
0.0
0-3 du/ac
3-6
6-11
11-18
18-27+
163
630
223
244
o
197.4
6 . 3 a vg .
1,260
15.0
0.0
0.0
2.5
16.5
67.6
30.7
132.3
63.1
392.8
3.8 avg.
1,260 du
Excludes Future Urban acreage in calculation.
Note: The acreages in the tables above and on the General Development Plan
~p are indicated to the nearest one-tenth acre based on planimeter readings.
Minor modifications that result from technical refinements during the SPA
planning and subdivision process shall not require an amendment to this plan,
providing the spirit and intent of the plan are maintained.
(8/16/94) 'i('lQ/9I'}!5)
9
a. Residential Summary
Table D presents the distribution of residential
acreage and units in EastLake Greens and EastLake
Trails to the various General Plan density catego-
ries.
Table D
EastLake Greens and Eastlake Trails
Proposed Residential Densities
Residential Category
Acres
Dwelling
Units
population1
Low (0-3 du/ac) 88.8
Low/Medium (3-6 du/ ac 291~4 3 00.0
Medium (6-11 du/ac) 192:2183.3
Medium/High (11-18 du/ ac)60:1 Te-;-Z".
High (18-27 du/ac) 0.0
280
1490~
1448~
780 g-s.u
-.0.
980
; ..' 4470'4'78-5-
3620-9-5-frr
1560"i-9-rZ
o
TOTALS
642.3
632.5
"4-I-9-r
3998
10978
19153,9
Ipopulation estimate based on household size factors from the Updated
General Plan. This projection is to be used for reference only and not
as the sole basis for projecting service needs nor as a limitation on
permitted dwelling units.
;.:.:....:....:.:.:.;....;....:-:->:->>:<.;....:.:....;.;.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:-:.:.:.;.:.>>:.:.;.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:-:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:';':':'
b. Density Transfer
In order to promote flexibility in residential
densities, the transfer of dwelling units from one
residential category to another within any SPA may
be approved as a part of the SPA plan approval
process. Notwithstanding this provision, the
clustering provisions of the General Plan Update
shall be utilized to maintain the community charac-
ter inherent in the density categories established
by this General Development Plan.
Transfers of density shall be based on evidence
that the proposed transfer would substantially
improve the spatial or functional relationships of
the involved SPA, or would materially increase the
quality of land use, circulation or conservation
pattern thereof. Transfers of density into the low
density category should not result in a reduction
in lot size requirements.
Should such a transfer be approved, applicable
statistics and the General Development Plan Map
shall be revised as an administrative matter with-
out the necessity of a formal plan amendment. The
proposed number of dwelling units within each of
the two designated SPAs is indicated below. Minor
adjustments to these statistics may be made with
(8/ 16/94 )(J.OJ9/~?)
J;O'" ,
-
')
approval of SPA plans without amendment to this
GDP. Density may be increased on the parcels
within EastLake Greens designated for such an
increase in accordance with the provisions and
conditions of approval of the EastLake Greens SPA
Plan.
Sectional Planning Area
Maximum Dwelling Units
EastLake Greens SPA
EastLake Trails SPA
2, 8712~.738
1. 260
TOTAL
4,1313,998
(8/16/94 ) (10Z9}95)
11"
./-
/
, T
/
General
Development
Plan
- -
- - -
i:\. ~i {j f)t~~(i
RESIDENTIAL
MAll
LANl USE ACRES OUI AC lHTS
CQLOW 250.5 !r3 743
P
~ Low/MedUn 3896 3-6 2008
~ MedUn 242.2 6-11 1975 PO
~ MedunlHgl 1254 11-18 1684
~I-t\tl 11.0 18-27. 250
SIb- T olal 1018.7 8660
NON-RESIDENTIAL
l.ND USE ACRES
CQ RehII 51.9
: c-o I Ptofeuionll & 6.6
Actrnslr81Ml
~ r=:r"~&ebn1g 135.9
~ Open Space 1876
~ Pldc/CMISi-f'l.dc 137.9
~ P8r1<s & RIlcJ'Mlicn 295.4
~ MaJOl' Ci'cU8bon 214.7
SIb- T ol8I 1030.2
~ FuIln lkbIIn 72.9
ProjeCt T 0IlII 2121.8 ac 6660 du
.. Cand.date ChurCh Site
(10) _ i'rteflm o....,.tlCWl: PIIrcel ~t to luh.. General De~t ""n Amendment
to be COMI."'" .Ith the ChLiII V..I. General Plan.
~ fASTLAKE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EAm.AKE DEVELOPMENT CO,
~inti ~
~~t~~~~~~.! ~ ~
.~
I" 1_.,'....
>(
Exhibit 1
General
Development
Plaq
-- -
- - -
~ = fn !}n~~~{!
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres du/ac Units
p
IL~ 250.5 0-3 743 PO
LM LowfMedium 381.0 0-6 1903
M Medium 251.1 6-11. 2023
MH MediumfHigh 115.3 11-18. 1608
H High 11.0 18-27+ 250
Sub-Total 1008.9 6527
L
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres *
C Retail 51.9
CoO Prof. & Admin. 6.8
I-R Res. & Ltd. Mfgr. 135.9
0 Open Space 187.6
PQ Public/Quasi-Pub. 146.9
P Parks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub-Total 1040.0
~Future Urban 72.9
Project Totals 2121.8 6527
. Canc:ttctat. C"Yl"cft Site
Amendment Key
lID) . .ruerm ~: Perc" auo,ect 10 tut... a.n.al 0.....00"'..." Plan ~1
to De C~''''I wrtft "- au. V'I'. General ....n
DllIl Areas being Amended
~ fASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY ff'( EASTlAKE DEVELOPMENT CO.
~inti ~
~,~~~n! ~ .....4
~.~
I I c.....,....
9m /915
.I
Exhibit 1
Project Components
(Neighborhoods)
l ~ ~p~
I N"-
: r\:
I
G,
/~~
/
I(
Ii r""",,"'~ \
/1==' ,I".. ~
h r,'?
-7 Eas~-r- '":"J )
-~ -H ~:-
v~ -:1~'?'
-.0>-"
~H, ....~
-.... ,,\
~ \)
~~ <:: ""'7/
~ - Cer1IBr -~~
~ ~ )
, .--~/ \
~& )~~\!
~ J. ~ L
~- r ~\
~""~I 1
~=~\~
,E ~
~ ~\
, i-- \\
~/
</
r?-~-,'11 -l
\{ )/~, r
..l\ /--==-, / j" ~. ;d If\
~~ Eas+' ft.. ke HIls Ii [:,T ~ ,,,,,,. 7~"'::"~-':;'.. ==. .
\~I~. ?,/-/", J\\ H~i Eas~ _"L '~~~"f l\1
,\l ,_/ ~r~.</ ..' J I \ \ Busir14fss Centef C ~Bl sine~E \
'\~, /:/~'!/ \ ,"""'- ; · tA n1er J;~ 1\'-
\~ ~~~:.IJi :.lIke shiL. --==1 ~"""<"= '. 'I' I\'i
\:~ /;:/ \ I ~res \\\\ ~''\~. fJ
\'-(;t./lol- l "=~" .\.\~tl _.rd ~~/" ..j
\h ""-_-___.",- 1'\ . L~ ..I/~~ ~
\~ --.-.-..-.-.-.._"1. ViBage .. _.-.-
':, ' ~. Ce. ,_........~ 1/"
, . II ..: "
~/:J I
.J!'.. ~'p -...~_I'
h ~'::/ ?'Eas lake. "
,'< .. ~ Aqtivity
." Crbnidor
>;~l .
Ii
iI
I!
r
T
!EastLakei\
I; ,V< ods
J
I.L> I;
, jlr
\ ;7
1'i;;;;'7
1 . (ii!'
/''''....;:..-. ~A..
c. /."'~ ~""::Y_,,______
[;;' il', '""
II ~ ~
II
EastLake II
Trails
. ! EastLake \
i Greens '\. '"
Ii '" "-
, '...",'
il "" ~
~I"~ "\. '-.
,'.ill' \ '\. \\\~
,::1.'\, ~'\ ~, ~~~ ',' /
'I'" \~" -~~~~,. '.
~---':":>~
,-~'---"---- '~
~ r .. ,
~ EastLake II
II
EastLake III
~ EASTLAKE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT Co.
'"
J r..
1
iii"
n
7
I....
(
- ' \./"
1 """"'
17 ,DIlIy-,.,.
Cinti m
Land Planning l. ~
~~
Exhibit 2
EastLake Greens
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
Approved by the Chula Vista City Council
Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994
Proposed Amendment - Strikeout/Redline Version
October 9, 1995
Updated November J, J995
EastLake Development Company
Chula Vista, California
(619) 421-0127
Prepared by:
Cinti Land Planning
San Diego, California
(619) 223-7408
/-J //~ --.:::' //
Chapter One:
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.5.1
1.5.2
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
1.10
1.11
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN
Table of Contents
~
Introduction
Location of EastLake Greens Planning Area........I-1
Relationship to EastLake I SPA...................I-2
Planning Process.................................I-6
Scope and Purpose of the Plan....................I-7
Relevant General Plan Provisions.................I-7
Land Use Element.................................I-7
Eastern Territories Area Plan....................I-9
Legal Significance..............................I-11
Interpreting the SPA Plan.......................I-11
General Development Plan........................I-12
Public Facilities and Financing Plan and
Development Agreement.........................I-12
Environmental Impact Report.....................I-13
Implementation of the SPA Plan..................I-16
Chapter Two: SPA Plan
2 . 1 community Structure.................................. I 1-1
2.2 Neighborhoods........................................ 11-1
2.3 EastLake Greens Neighborhood.........................II-2
2.4 Housing Programs.................................... .11-5
Chapter
3.1
3.2
3.2.1
3.3
3.4
3.5
3.6
3.7
Three: circulation
Introduction...................................III-1
SUb-Regional Network....................... ....111-1
Route 125..................................... .111-1
Community Network........ ......................111-2
Private Streets................................III-2
Phasing of Road Improvements...................III-2
Transit Planning Principles....................III-2
Bicycle Routes... ...... ...................... ..111-4
Four: Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Introduction................................... .IV-1
Chapter
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
(8-16-94)
Open Space...................................... IV-1
Tr ail s. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 3
Golf Course..................................... IV-3
Communi ty Park.................................. IV-3
Neighborhood Park Sites.........................IV-7
Public Park Compliance..........................IV-7
Park and Open Space Implementation..............IV-7
+
, -/1..17
"',." ~.;(
Chapter Five:
5.1
5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.7.1
5.7.2
5.8
5.9
Chapter six:
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.5
6.6
6.6.1
6.6.2
6.7
6.8
6.9
6.10
6.11
6.12
6.13
Table of Contents (cont'd)
~
Public Facilities
Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Roads. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Domestic Water Supply.......................
Reclaimed Water Supply......................
Waste Water Facilities......................
Storm Water Drainage........................
Schools - General...........................
Elementary Schools..........................
Secondary Schools...........................
police and Fire Services....................
Library Service.............................
community Design
community Character.........................
Grading. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Building Scale and variety..................
General Landscape concept...................
Landscape Components........................
Landscape and Irrigation Standards..........
Landscape Maintenance.......................
Landscape Intensity Classifications.........
Exterior Fencing............................
Signage. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Permanent signs.............................
Temporary signs.............................
Design, orientation and Setbacks - single
Family Detached Areas.....................
Design and orientation - Single Family
Attached and Multi-Family Areas...........
site Planning and Design Guidelines.........
Off-Street Parking..........................
Precise Plan Guidelines - village Center
V-1
V-I
V-1
V-4
V-6
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-9
V-I0
V-10
VI-1
VI-1
VI-3
VI-3
VI-3
VI-6
VI-6
VI-6
VI-8
VI-10
VI-10
VI-11
VI-II
VI-13
VI-14
VI-14
Areas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . VI-15
Scenic Highways............................. VI-IS
Scenic Corridor Guidelines.................. VI-16
Appendices
(ill sepa:rate volume)
EastLake Affordable Housing Program (included at end of SPA Plan)
~lf.iiiIA~~~. Bi);'ifiKl:J'1I1!'r~'ii.t:~iPIi'1~~!l'miIJa~'~i~Jt0IgQ'q"~ip'!,'i'):
Meeting Notes
Transportation Analysis
Water Subarea Master Plan
Wastewater Subarea Master Plan
Preliminary Detention and Drainage Study
Utilities Service Analysis
Recreation Master Plan
School Districts - Mello-Roos Financing Plans
Phasing Plan
8 16 94 f"ti1%'1il"'f/'9SC'
(/ / ) lL",IL..L.~.J
~
/ /-;
/)
--:;
/
List of Exhibits
Exhibit Number and Title
Page
1. Vicinity Map...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1-4
2 . proj ect Components........................................ 1-5
3 . site utilization Plan..................................... 1-14
4.General Development Plan..................................I-15
5. community structure....................................... I 1-4
6.Circulation Plan and StreetSections......................III-3
7. Parks and Open Space...................................... IV-2
8 . Tr a i I s P I an. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IV - 4
8b.Golf Course View Point/Rest stop.........................IV-4b
9. Country Club Concept...................................... IV-5
10.Domestic WaterPlan....................................... .V-2
11.Reclaimed Water Plan......................................V-5
12. Waste Water Plan.......................................... V-7
13. Storm Water Plan.......................................... V-8
14. Grading Plan............................................. VI-2
15.General Landscape Plan...................................VI-4
16.Landscape Intensity Classifications......................VI-7
I7 . Fencing Plan............................................. VI-9
18. Signage Plan............................................. VI-12
List of Tables
Table Number and Title
page
1. statistical Summary of Land Uses......................II-3
2. Parkland Dedication Standards.........................IV-8
3. Domestic Water Demand..................................V-3
4. Fire Flow Standards....................................V-3
5. Reclaimed Water Demand.................................V-4
6. Average Waste Water Flow............ ............V-6
m~ ~.
/.
. ~
/
/ <'. ,/
/ ~ ,-.: y
CHAPTER ONE - INTRODUCTION
The EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and
accompanying Environmental Impact Report, Public Facilities and
Financing Plan and Development Agreement are required for the
orderly development of the subject property. The area encompassed
by the Plan is appropriately designated for development on the City
of Chula Vista General Plan and is intended to be included in an
expanded EastLake I Planned Community Zone. Under this designation
and zoning, the area will be planned for development, subject to the
provisions of this SPA Plan and subsequent implementation actions by
the City of Chula Vista and other affected public agencies.
1.1 Location of EastLake Greens Planning Area
EastLake Greens is located in the eastern portion of the Chula Vista
City limits. The site is located on the south side of Telegraph
Canyon Road approximately 7.5 miles east of the Chula Vista Civic
Center. Exhibit 1 illustrates the location of EastLake Greens and
its proximity to the existing development within EastLake I.
Nearby existing communities include College Area Estates and the
otay Lakes Lodge Mobilehome Park. The remaining land to the south
and west is owned by The Baldwin Company.
The SPA includes the EastLake Greens neighborhood which is a golf
oriented residential neighborhood and the southern extension of the
Acti vi ty Corridor which is the location for most commercial and
public facilities wi thin the EastLake Community. The Acti vi ty
Corridor is the area west of EastLake Greens, between EastLake
Parkway and the alignment for SR-125. A high school site, community
park, commercial sites and other activity centers are located there.
Adjacent to Telegraph Canyon Road, is the EastLake Village Center
commercial area. The majority of this center was approved in the
EastLake I SPA and the southern portion included in this SPA
completes the plan for the major retail and office commercial
district within the EastLake Community.
References herein to the EastLake Greens SPA or EastLake Greens
generally, are meant to include the EastLake Greens residential
neighborhood and the Activity Corridor. Specific provisions
appropriate for residential development or other uses located within
residential areas are directed to the EastLake Greens neighborhood
only.
(8-16-94)
1,4
/ ,._:~
. "
/" ""') /..:
, -~ ~
1.2 Relationship to EastLake I SPA
EastLake Greens is the third residential neighborhood to be
developed within the Planned Community of EastLake. It is located
south of Telegraph Canyon Road and the proposed SR-125 alignment is
its western edge. The first two residential neighborhoods, EastLake
Hills and EastLake Shores, and the commercial and industrial
districts, EastLake Village Center and EastLake Business Center,
respectively, were approved in the EastLake I SPA. These areas, now
under construction, are also located north of Telegraph Canyon Road.
The EastLake I SPA Plan also included approximately 320 acres south
of Telegraph Canyon Road, a portion of EastLake Greens planning
area. Conceptual design studies were not completed for this area
however, and the EastLake I SPA called for the preparation of a
supplemental SPA Plan for the area south of Telegraph Canyon Road.
Later, as the planning progressed for the EastLake Greens SPA, it
was recognized that the acreage included within EastLake I was
inadequate for the project as envisioned. Additional acreage, south
of the property boundary at the proposed alignment of Orange Avenue,
was included in the EastLake Greens project site. Because this
additional acreage was not included in the EastLake I annexation and
zoning, the recent proposal to amend the General Plan, annex and
include the "expansion area" in the EastLake I Planned Community
District was initiated, (see Exhibit 2 Project Components). The
expansion area includes the site for the fourth residential
neighborhood, EastLake Trails, which is located directly to the east
of EastLake Greens and will be the subject of a separate SPA Plan.
As proposed in the General Development Plan Amendment, the revised
General Development Plan for the expanded EastLake I area will serve
as the interim General Plan for the property, until the
Comprehensive General Plan now underway is completed. This SPA Plan
has been prepared to be consistent with the Scenario IV Land Use
Plan and proposed policies which are expected to form the basis of
the updated General Plan.
1994 SPA Plan Amendment
The proposed amendment is an expansion of the EastLake Greens
neighborhood by 22.7 acres and an additional 97 units. The major
portion of this expansion is due to a realignment of Orange Avenue
during the recent General Plan actions related to the otay Ranch. A
smaller triangular area is also proposed to be added northeast of
the SDG&E easement. A future action is intended for the remaining
portion of EastLake property, known as the Land Swap property,
southwest of this easement.
In addition to the proposed expansion of the EastLake Greens SPA, a
number of density transfers are proposed within the SPA Plan. These
are refinements in the plan to reflect both actual conditions of
(8-16-94)
1-,""2'
,
~
.- ~ .~
. --" f W'":'-
Developed parcels and projected parcel densities. The total number of
units for the SPA is increased by 97 (units added by new area).
_1_.S;'9"BSJt~'JIJ.D~~fi
tlfli18llWiJII
(8/16/9S)[mlI&')j
1:.1-
/j7
' " "\ ,
VICINITY MAP
Rancho
Sante Fe
,
c
M
~fASTLAKE
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO.
, ~:;
I
/ -
, ~)
"",
~
~
\,
11
&
~
~
...
o
D
~rLl
Exhibit 1
Cinti
&~
16191 239,'815
Project Components
(Neighborhoods)
r------,
1. 1
._ .f...... '7"11."\.... ~ ~
\ ~. ~ "i~~
\~ !.'& ~ .~~
.J\ ~ /j' '~.: i /";N ~. '"
\.'Eas+,/t.ke HIs): /l' --=- " '\~~~eke:. .~-==~.. lJ\\. ~ IJ
, ~ oj/'1",f '\; T\\\ Eas ~ ~\ I ;
1 ~ /f:::::!i i I "\ I Bu. SS Center Blilsi1e' ~ -t \1 EastLake'\ rr
III /7 / 7! ~\ '-- I . \, ~ \. ~ ('
-' ~ \.,r
\~/1~EaSfLake St)6re~"\:-~~ r ': : ~~ } \' I I ~ 7 .'-
~~.~"...,/.~ ~r--::..~-:-~~' ;::~.~:.- -..;.: II . ;~~ --' .-- ~
, . -.- T il"'-' .~~~.......
,'- ~" n ; .,:":'-" : J . . -
~ ~
d; ~;J. '\ I f,......... ~..... ~~ fl(! /
/;.~.~ ~__" ./ f~- ~..;;:-,~.
!;<;.,~ / ,if \' :~i "~~~
I EastLaI", I ~ II \ ~~.... :~_~ ~" ;' ~
i I ....... \ \ ~LLC:U\I:1 -H I o.r-
; f Greens '- ~ ",,;1 Vistas -f-l' II\~
II. '\: '",,, '
'" '&,-'\. ('..A !
I ,,~..~
/ ~'\I' ~ '\, '" '_J ~
I ~ IJ,' \... '\. \'_ ~~, ,~ ""-
,i 'I~' "\ "', ~ --"\'.'. ---- ,.......\ J'\
, _ ,~ /. r .,.{ , ~ = ;;J I)
',' '<'- j'-'~~/ - - c;;: -~",
"~_""""~';;'- lio.'"
<d~~-~ ~ ~ (
.. ~-~I
l ~
EastLake II '~dl ;
,=~
~ EastLake III ~I' .
nm ~6"
/
.4t E4STLAKE
~intim
Land Planning l. ~
~o.
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT Co.
/~'-
/ ~ -,'
") 'J
-.,/<;
, /
Exhibit 2
1.3 Planning Process
The original plan for Janal Ranch (EastLake) was submitted to the
City on October 30, 1980, as a General Plan Amendment. The proposal
consisted of a General Plan Amendment and an application for pre-
zoning to a Planned Community zoning designation for the entire
3,000+ acre property. The property was located entirely within the
unofficial "Sphere-of Influence" of the City of Chula vista.
The original proposal called for a maximum of over 11,500
residential units covering seven residential density types, 209
acres of employment park, 31 acres of office, 29 acres of commercial
and associated open space, recreational and public facilities. The
property was intended to be developed over a 20-year time period.
This plan was withdrawn when it was recommended for denial by the
Planning commission.
On June 29, 1982, a reduced plan on 1,267.9 acres, containing a
maximum of 3,683 dwelling units, was submitted to the City for
annexation. The original design of the plan was maintained with some
modification in the arrangement of land uses and the location of the
high school and community park. The scaled down annexation included
a 145 acre employment park, 34 acres of office and commercial, 290
acres of open space and 166 acres of public facilities.
On July 15, 1984, the Chula vista City Council approved the
requested General Plan Amendment and adopted Planned Community
Zoning for EastLake I (1,267.9 acres). The remainder of the parcel
was designated "Future Urban" and an EastLake Policy Plan was
adopted by the city Council to establish future planning and
development guidelines (EastLake II).
1994 Amendment
In 1993 the Chula vista city Council approved a General Plan
amendment for the EastLake Land Swap property. Most of this
property, though adj acent to EastLake Greens, takes access from
EastLake Parkway in the area of the EastLake Activity Corridor,
southwest of the SDG&E easement. Two small parcels, northeast of the
SDG&E easement and north of Orange Avenue take access from the
internal circulation of the EastLake Greens neighborhood. These two
parcels are the subject if this amendment, which was submitted to
the city in February 1994. The balance of the Land Swap Property
will be the subject of a future separate amendment proposal.
(8-16-94)
1"--.6
- }
-/ !
1.4 Scope and Purpose of the Plan
The purpose of the EastLake Greens SPA (Sectional Planning Area)
Plan is to provide guidelines for future public and private
development within EastLake Greens and the Activity Corridor.
The SPA Plan includes a number of community objectives and policies
which are consistent with the Chula Vista General Plan, as well as
other City policies and ordinances governing new development. To
implement these obj ecti ves and policies, a series of development
guidelines and accompanying Planned Community (PC) zoning
regulations are set forth herein. In addition, a Public Facilities
and Financing Plan and Development Agreement have been included to
guide the developer and affected public agencies such a the City of
Chula Vista, Sweetwater Union High School District, Chula Vista City
School District and the Otay Water District in carrying out required
implementation activities.
1.5 Relevant General Plan Provisions
The Land Use Element of the proposed General Plan Update includes a
ser ies of goals and obj ecti ves which are to be achieved in the
development of the overall planning area. A second set of more
specific goals and objectives is included in the Eastern Territories
Area Plan. The proposed proj ect is very responsive to these
provisions of the proposed General Plan as indicated below.
1.5.1.
Land Use Element
Objective 8. Provide for community and neighborhood commercial
centers in developing areas convenient to new neighborhoods and
maintain, renovate and redevelop existing centers.
The project includes an expansion of the EastLake Village Center
commercial district established in EastLake I. Shops and services in
this area will meet the local commercial needs of residents of
EastLake and adjacent properties.
Objective 10. Encourage the development of a diversity of
housing types and prices.
The proposed project includes a wide range of housing opportunities
ranging from stacked multi-family units to large single family
homes. A range of product sizes and amenities will permit diversity
in housing prices.
Objective 11. Assure that new development meets or exceeds
(8-16-941
r:'7'
,,/ -'---
/ J
/; /
'5/
a standard of high quality planning and design.
The existing EastLake project has established a very high standard
of planning and design which has been recognized locally and at the
national level. EastLake Greens will continue this pattern of
excellence.
Objective 12. Provide for the development of multi-family
housing in appropriate areas convenient to public services,
facilities and circulation.
Multi-family products within EastLake Greens are generally located
in close proximity to major roads and the support services found in
the Activity Corridor, extending along EastLake Parkway and SR-125.
Thus, an increased level of public services and facilities are
readily available.
Objective 13. Encourage planned developments, with a
coordinated mix of urban uses, open spaces, and amenities.
The EastLake Planned Community lS comprised of a serles of
residential neighborhoods each with a recreational focus/major
amenity. EastLake Greens is the third residential neighborhood to
be developed. The proposed project integrates an 18 hole golf
course recreational amenity into a diverse residential neighborhood.
Within the community as a whole, a balanced mix of urban uses, open
space, parks and recreational amenities are provided.
Objective 14. For new developments in Eastern Territories, the
predominant character shoul d be low medi um densi ty,
single-family housing. Where appropriate in terms of physical
setting encourage development of quality, large-lot housing.
The proposed EastLake Greens project includes a significant amount
of low to medium density single family housing. A greater
proportion of lower densities are proposed in the adjacent EastLake
Trails neighborhood. The increased density within EastLake Greens
is appropriate considering its location adj acent to the planned
SR-125 freeway, between the EastLake Village Center and planned
Urban Center at SR-125/0range Avenue. A reduced density is
appropriate further to the east, in the vicinity of EastLake Trails,
where development interfaces with the open areas of the Chula Vista
Greenbel t. When considered together, the EastLake Greens and
EastLake Trails neighborhoods meet the statistical standards for
density consistency with the proposed Land Use Element.
(8-16-94)
..I4".
/","
/" ,..../
-.~.,..>......
Objecti ve 24.
efficiency in
landscaping.
Promote water conservation through increased
essential uses and use of low water demand
The EastLake Planned Community is being developed in accordance with
the provisions of a comprehensive Water Conservation Plan which was
prepared for the project. The Landscape Intensity exhibit (Exhibit
16) for the EastLake Greens project delineates the areas of
"natural, naturalized and drought tolerant" planting throughout the
project where irrigation requirements have been reduced through the
selection of appropriate plant materials.
Objective 25. Encourage, where safe and feasible, waste water
reclamation and use of reclaimed water for irrigation and other
uses.
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan includes a reclaimed water irrigation
system for the golf course and other major community landscaping.
This system has been oversized to provide capacity for future
development areas to the east where additional demand may be
crea ted. The EastLake proj ect has been a pioneer in the use of
reclaimed water for grading and other purposes.
Objective 27. Establish a growth management system to assure
that private development is coordinated with the provision of
adequate public facilities and services.
An essential element of the proposed project is the Public
Facilities Financing Plan which sets forth the phasing and financing
requirements for the extension and/or expansion of public facilities
and services to serve the project. The existing Public Facilities
and Financing Plan has been successfully used to regulate the rate
of development in EastLake I versus the provision of public
improvements.
1.5.2
Eastern Territories Area Plan
The following objectives are stated in the Eastern Territories Area
Plan which is the community plan component of the General Plan which
focuses on the project site and vicinity.
Objective 1. Direct new urban development ~n Eastern
Territories to broad mesa tops which are generally located away
from environmentally sensitive areas such as flood plains,
canyons, and steeply sloped areas.
(8-16-94)
I-9"
, .
" -
,~:; ~~;
Objective 2. Require thorough environmental reviews of all
proposed conversions of vacant or agricultural land to urban
uses.
No designated environmentally sensitive areas are located on the
proj ect site. A comprehensive proj ect EIR has been prepared in
conj unction with the current application. A previous EIR was
prepared for the EastLake Planned Community Master Plan (EIR
81-03). The analyses contained in these documents represents a very
thorough evaluation of the proposed project consistent with this
objective.
Obj ecti ve 4. Crea te, for the planning area as a whol e, a
balanced community of residential, commercial, and industrial
uses. To the extent that employment uses may be more difficult
to establish, provide for additional designations of commercial
and industrial land and encourage retention of vacant land for
commercial and industrial uses.
The proposed project is the second major development phase of the
EastLake Planned Community which will be a balanced community with
residential, commercial, employment and recreational uses in a high
quali ty environment. The overall plan for EastLake represents a
smaller scale version of what is intended for the Eastern
Territories as a whole. The EastLake Greens project will complete
the major commercial and support uses area of the community and
provide golf-oriented residential opportunities, a desirable
life-style not currently available in the City.
Objective 5. Assure that all new developments are provided with
acceptable levels of public services. Each development should
include local public facilities required to serve the
development and also contribute toward construction of city-
wide facilities needed by the development.
As noted in response to Objective 27 of the Land Use Element, a
Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) is an integral component of
the proposed project. The PFFP addresses all of the infrastructure
and service requirements of the proposed project, including both on-
and off-site facilities. The project's participation in the
Development Impact Fees (DIF) program for city-wide improvements is
included in the PFFP. The proj ect will also be developed in a
manner consistent with the "Thresholds" adopted by the City to
maintain the quality of life for all residents. These service and
facility criteria are expected to be at the core of the forthcoming
Growth Management Element of the General Plan Update.
[8-16-94)
I-=!\j
".r/ ..-:
:::;:'//.
//
Objective 6. Encourage orderly and compact patterns of
development, which will make maximum use of existing public
facili ties and avoid "leap frog" development. In particular,
encourage development phasing which will substantially build
out drainage and hydrologic basins with existing public service
facilities before developing new basins.
The proposed project is the next logical step in the development of
the EastLake Planned Community. In fact, the project site includes
a portion of the EastLake I site which was zoned for development in
1982. The project site is contiguous to the developed portion of
EastLake I and all public services and utili ties are directly
available.
1.6 Legal Significance
Adoption of the EastLake Greens SPA Plan and zoning regulations by
the City Council will establish the official development policy of
the City of Chula Vista for EastLake Greens. All future
discretionary permits will need to be consistent with the EastLake
Greens SPA Plan to be approved.
1.7 Interpreting the SPA Plan
The Plan is intended to be dynamic rather than a fixed and
inflexible document. New communities require periodic adjustment
and updating to reflect changes that inevitably occur over time.
Many of the judgments and interpretations of this plan will involve
responsible city officials; however, in the event of differences,
the Chula Vista City Council shall be the final appeals body. The
Plan will be periodically reviewed and modified when appropriate to
meet changed conditions.
The SPA Plan provides guidance for future development at the
subdivision and improvement plan level, and is the basic reference
for determining permitted land uses, densities, total unit, and
required public facilities. These are illustrated in the Si te
Utilization Plan, Exhibit 3, which is the key map for this SPA Plan.
The SPA Plan is not a guarantee that a certain dwelling unit yield
will be achieved at the subdivision level. The maximum density as
specified for individual parcels shall not be exceeded; however,
actual dwelling unit yields for projects will be determined by the
City Council based on field conditions, site plan and architectural
review, and a number of external factors that influence the design
and density of individual projects. Any transfer of units from one
(8-16-94)
1-11"
/ ~~ _ ,~. ~l ~1
development parcel to another shall be processed as an amendment to
the Site Utilization Plan.
Even though the SPA Plan contains specific guidance for development,
it is not intended to be used in a manner which predetermines the
development solution for each and every parcel. It is intended to
be used as a basic guide which reflects the City's intent for
determining the intensity, design and desired character of use for
the property.
Since the SPA Plan implements the Chula Vista General Plan, it is
not necessary to refer to both the General Plan and the SPA Plan to
determine what policies and standards are applicable to a parcel of
land. The SPA Plan will provide the guidance to enable the city to
make decisions on individual projects.
1.8 General Development Plan
With respect to detailed standards, the amended Planned Community
Zoning Regulations, which are adopted as an integral companion to
this SPA Plan, provide detailed development and use standards that
are applicable to each parcel of land. The General Development Plan
for the expanded EastLake I PC District is included as Exhibit 4.
The area identified as EastLake Trails shall have a SPA Plan
approved prior to development.
In order to promote flexibility in residential densities, the
transfer of dwelling units from one residential category to another
within the EastLake Trails SPA may be approved as a part of SPA Plan
approval. Notwithstanding this provision, the clustering criteria
of the General Plan Update must be maintained for the EastLake
Greens and EastLake Trails combined.
EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails combined.
Transfers in density shall be based on evidence that the proposed
transfer would substantially improve spatial or functional
relationships, or would materially increase the quality of land use,
circulation pattern or resource conservation. Should such a
transfer of density be approved, the applicable statistics and the
General Development Plan Map shall be revised as an administrative
action without need for a formal plan amendment.
1.9 Public Facilities and Financing Plan and Development
Agreement
Two important companions to the SPA Plan are the Public Facilities
and Financing Plan and Development Agreement. The Public Facilities
and Financing Plan provides the description of infrastructure needs
such as sewer, water, road, storm drainage, schools, parks, fire
station, libraries and transit facilities, plus a development
(8-16-94)
1-12
l
'; ./
_< F :;.
I ,
phasing schedule, estimated costs of public facilities and financing
methods.
The Public Facilities and Financing Plan must be adopted by the City
Council prior to the recording of any subdivision map within
EastLake Greens to ensure that required public facilities will be
provided by the developer concurrent with need.
The implementing actions covered by the Public Facilities and
Financing Plan are:
Use of Public Financing Mechanisms where applicable
Construction of major streets and sewer, water and
drainage facilities
Internal subdivision improvements pursuant to the
Subdivision Map Act
provision of schools, parks and other public facilities
Maintenance of certain facilities such as private parks,
open space areas and street medians.
In order to ensure that the responsibilities of the developer and
the City are clearly understood, a Development Agreement will serve
as a contract to essentially vest the EastLake Greens SPA Plan and
EastLake I Expansion PC Zoning in return for assurance that the
public facilities for EastLake Greens will be provided.
1.10
Environmental Impact Report
The Master Environmental Impact Report prepared for the EastLake
General Plan Amendment in 1982 concluded that adverse environmental
impacts were insignificant or could be mitigated with the exception
of impacts in the areas of:
Agriculture
Air Quality
Growth Inducement
The City Council adopted CEQA findings (EIR 81-03) which included a
statement of overriding considerations as required by the California
Environmental Quality Act.
A supplemental Environmental Impact Report has been prepared for the
EastLake Greens SPA Plan, General Plan Amendment, PC District
Amendment, and annexation and will be considered by the City Council
in accordance with applicable law.
(8-16-94)
r~
'-j ---7
..., /,/'
1.11
Implementation of the SPA Plan
In terms of tentati ve subdivision map and site plan application
processing, the EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides a way to
substantially reduce processing time. In essence, many issues and
problems have been resolved by the SPA Plan prior to approval of
specific development proposals. The project review time will be
shortened because projects that conform to the SPA Plan and require
no additional environmental information will be easier to review and
process.
There are several major components involving local public agencies
that will implement the SPA Plan. The Public Facilities and
Financing Plan contains a Phasing Plan to guide local officials in
establishing programs and projects to implement the SPA Plan.
The subdivision arrangement indicated on the SPA Plan exhibits is
conceptual. Modifications may occur as a part of the tentative
tract map process. Adjustments to the SPA Plan Exhibits and text,
to reflect modifications based on an approved tentative tract map,
may be accomplished as an administrative manner.
(8-16-94)
I-J.~.
;--/,.::;A1
CHAPTER TWO - SPA PLAN
2.1 Community Structure
In order to fully understand the EastLake Greens plan, it must be
remembered that the project is part of a larger planned community
encompassing approximately 3,219 acres. The first phase, EastLake
I, consists of approximately forty percent of the total acreage.
This second phase, EastLake Greens SPA, will add approximately 432
acres to the area approved for development. The established
EastLake I SPA Plan and the overall structure of the future
communi ty has influenced the design and planning of EastLake
Greens. It is important to keep an overview of the basic concept
of the EastLake Community in mind throughout the planning process.
The EastLake Planned Community is intended to be a large-scale
multi-use planned development having a unique sub-community
identity as an integral component within the City of Chula Vista.
The community is planned to provide a signi ficant number of
employment and commercial opportunities to encourage people to
1 i ve, work, shop and play wi thin the communi ty. In order to
achieve this goal, the plan provides an employment park, village
center commercial sites, a broad range of housing types for people
of all ages and incomes, a substantial amount of open space and
recreational facilities, a complete transportation system, and a
variety of civic and public facilities.
Community level open space with employment, commercial and
insti tutional uses are integrated to form an "acti vi ty spine"
within the plan. The function of the activity spine is to group
community level facilities and services along a major
transportation corridor in close proximity to residential
neighborhoods. EastLake Parkway is the spine which traverses the
entire EastLake I planning area and extends into EastLake Greens.
Along this spine are a combination of public and private facilities
including the employment park, village center commercial uses,
community park, high school, civic uses and other facilities. The
Activity Corridor incorporates substantial open space and visual
amenity areas to provide a pleasant visual environment for
residents, workers and visitors within the community.
2.2 Neighborhoods
The land plan approved for EastLake I represents integrated land
planning and transportation concepts. The major transportation
(8-16-94)
tt1-
~- . -~? ~:?
corridor (SR-125) serves as a key transportation corridor for the
entire project. All high activity uses (i.e., commercial, office,
civic, and employment park) are located along the SR-125 corridor.
The EastLake Village enter is located at the principal intersection
(SR-l 25 and Telegraph Canyon Road) of the community with linkages
to the EastLake Hills and EastLake Shores residential neighborhoods
and the EastLake Business Center. The plan for EastLake Greens
extends these concepts south of Telegraph Canyon Road. Additional
EastLake Village Center acreage is provided, together with school
and park uses along the extension of EastLake Parkway. The golf
oriented residential products will complement the housing types
provided in the residential neighborhoods of EastLake I.
2.3 EastLake Greens Neighborhood
The structure of the EastLake Greens neighborhood is illustrated in
Exhibit 5 (the EastLake Trails neighborhood is also included to
establish context). The Activity Corridor is evident along the
western border, while the Salt Creek open space corridor is located
at the eastern edge. The "Community Trail" provides a
landscape/open space connection through both neighborhoods, con-
necting the eastern and western edges. It is extended from the
north where it serves as a connection between the neighborhoods of
EastLake I. The structure of the EastLake Greens neighborhood
places single family uses at the core, surrounded by a looping golf
course. Clustered housing and nodes of high density products are
distributed around the perimeter of the neighborhood. The low
density and golf course/open space core establishes the desired
"country club" character for the neighborhood while the perimeter
development provides a wider range of housing types and prices than
would typically be associated with such an environment. Two high
density parcels are located near the club house to provide luxury
housing for those who wish to focus their social and recreational
activities at the country club.
At the edges of development, single family homes are placed at the
southern boundary adjacent to Otay Ranch, while cluster housing is
located adj acent to Telegraph Canyon Road. Estate homes are
proposed at the development edge adjoining open space along Salt
Creek to provided an appropriate interface.
The EastLake Greens neighborhood is bounded by Telegraph Canyon
Road on the north, EastLake Parkway on the west, Hunte Parkway on
the east, and Orange Avenue on the south. Access is taken from
both EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway, with two entrances off of
EastLake Parkway and three off of Hunte Parkway. The neighborhood
is proposed to include a variety of housing products, ranging from
conventional single family homes to stacked 11 apartment-type"
(8-16-94) 11:2-
/1'/ //"./;
//1 '
units. Amaximum of ~it~:~~ dwelling units is proposed for the
853 acre site (average density m~l~ du/ac). An 18 hole golf
course winds through the residential areas, providing a major
visual and recreational amenity. A clubhouse facility and
driving range are also proposed. In addition, three neighborhood
park parcels are shown along the interior residential collectors
to provide additional opportunities.
The plan also includes an elementary school site and adjacelJt
p~~~ park within the residential neighborhood, and a high
school and community park site within the Activity Corridor. The
land use statistics are summarized in Table 1 following.
TABLE 1
EastLake Greens SPA
statistical summary of Land Uses
Land Use
Acres
Residential
Village Center
PUblic/Quasi-Public
Schools
Parks
Golf Course
Open Space
Major Circulation
4 34 . l~,gf!'\~,j~
19.6
T'T-;-X ~,,9m~;,l~
59.2
~
160.4
32.8
87.1
Total Development Area
846.9
Future Urban Area
6.3
TOTAL SITE
853.2
1'-'~";''''''--''-''-''';'''''''''''''
(8/16/94)DLQ~l9~
~'
/ ;;.; "
2111I111I111 :>
"llotl - '0
. ,:'11'" fi .OCJl.."CDOCD."lD....(')NlD.,,(').....CDlDO-.IOCDO.O
II I!~ .".OOOCDlDCJl...,CDCJl.CDlDCD_CD.".N..,.....,....lD..,1O ....
.. "I~lIl1i. ---- N'- N ----N ~
I ,,1'1111
-.I IHIIIIIII
0.. 1.I'U'1
'11I1'
111I1111I11
'1..111'
Z "ll!I~!~::
o
-
~
N
-
-J
-
~
::>
"
III
.i~~o~~-~mM~c~~~~mNm~MO-MN~~mm ~
~ENN~..~~~~~~~~~~~~momNMMmo..m
_a ...... --- ...... :
EJ I ('t)
i
or -
A :c
-5 .~If'~ :2
~ '2~ X
~ \j~l
,... w
CD
C\l
j.;
"
"it III
(')'"3'
'tl
I J
" " ~l
III III
C\l
cw; 1.--
It) lJ f
CD
j~ I
S"
->
U~
Ii i
(ij ji! Ii
- d t ~
{:2
t)
Q) ~s .ll
'0' Ii ell
... :5 :-
ll. . .
"
III
.
!
u
c
.
!
u
c
........CDOO..,......,."..,IO(')lD..,lD."....CJlCJl....OCDCDO..,(')CJl-
~.~~M~ci~c~..N~~o~m.~cici~~~M~~ .
--NNN--- .--N---N ----- ...... M
.
>-
i ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~~~~~---------------------~-
&lo666o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6~
(.)U - .JtI:.Jtt.Jtl:.JtI:
~~ B~~~~~ ~
~~~ Ulll~'tl'tl'tl ~
~~~_0~ 000"''''''''''''''''''' III
. lii:l:l8~~.c:,g,gBliUiI~~~allil~~
-. ue~fi~ ~ .8.1~ .8~c%c%c%c%c%c%c%8i)
~ ::) &!:!.l!10 CD e~ ;&,&c c c c c c cU 0
c: i =:g.g~.i 8'ijj'''''-'ijj 8.~ ~.8.~ ~ ~~'.,
Q) ~ >~~:fwuzzfzooooo<5'<5'o~
'0
.- ..
(/) "ij __N "'N(,).~lD""
~e 'OO~~~~~~~0000000
. t. ~~00~~~~~Ooooooo
c:
o
Z
jjoooooooooooooooQQQQQQQQQQooQ
i 11 cccccccccc c
a; ~~
; ~ .
C:-j .O-N(')..,."lD....CDCJlO...N(')..,."lD....CD "i
me _N~.~~~m~--________NNNNNNNNN i
~ ~ t. ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci: i
_ 0:
en "-
4/"'~...
~ $,~
II /~.
.;,
o
LLlUl ~~
~zt~
SLLI o~
L-LLlb
r-=~ <
lilt.!)
~
~
/ /V. /;
.cO-__ - /
" ~,
ZJIIIIIlIlI.
'.......
e:( ':I.~'
.~~~:~
..J I""t"
''''''
a.. ,tI""t
IImllHI
1:::::1
'I'
ZIIIIIII
~II
011111111111
-
t:i:
N
-
~
-
....
::>
w
-.
ea= ...00) 'Il:tlt)U)OCOIonCCr--. NN co ""'m ..,...,.mQ)
~~lt).Q)=2~coO').:U)Q):U)w~~lt)~~
~
~~~~~~~ ~
~ N l"-
N
~i~~lt)~(Q..,.Q)~M~U)-M~..OIonlt)OCO
~CNN..~.~~~~~~~~~O~~~~
~~ ~ ~
u
~
O'JU')'llI'CJ)OM.. -6
=Mo;ai~.a:) CX)
cD
: I"-I"-CI)OO~ I"-ltlltllD <DC\/ lD~OlOllD 0l~C'l
~ ~.~.M~ci~~~.~N~~6~~..
C __(\INN..........- ("')__N___N .....-
u
'"
,....M-C7.lMC\I- r')
"":oLri,,&ria)cO .
-N ..... N
~
.
!!
...
<
>-
i- It)lt)lt)U')U')U')U')U')U')U')U')U')U')U')U')
ccU')U')U')U')U')---------------
~~66666~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.S:L~ '0 ~~~-!
DD o~mm~m c
~~ ~~~~~~ 0
~~~ um~~~~ ;
~~~_oo~oooo~~~~~~~ ~c
c~;o>>oooouuuuuuu~~
~~~2~~€€€€~!~!!!!~.~
UOOuc~ooooooooooooooooooou
&~~OO~E~~~~cccccccu~
"'DD~EE~~~~~~~~~~~=~
~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~o'"
>~~~wuzzzzooooooo~~
Il)U"HIHtJU') I.t)
___.....C\IU')-
JHn~J,~6J,
<<0-
.-<
,,;
t~ccccccccccccccceeeee
~.. <<<<<
..=
c<
eeeeece
<<<<< <
.
- .
ctl:l
;og
c:c
0)"
-c-
.- ...
UJ -. __N -N('f)"~CD"'"
~ ~ ~ ,:)(jc:",:~~~<? "r":'chchchchchchch
I .~>~~OOOO~~~~~OOOOOOO
c: a..z
o
Z
ii
S
~
~
(/)
.;,
o
./
, /f-;
/' '-;
~
'0
CD
C')
I"-
C\I
u
C\I'"
C'i"3
'0
E-, ~.
~~
0_\ OD'~
... c:,
c:: 'c E
\JO- ~ i
..-
..l;
u
'"
C\I
M
LO
CD
;
i
iij
;Q
It
< i"
~ 1i i
~! ~
g;; ~
U ~ 1
"I:; ~ ~
I! ~ !1
~ii! ~
~.~ :: ~ ~
~.. i .~ s
.!l~ t ~ .!
r ~ 0 ~
"I
..
!.
~
..
~
..
~
ti
Q)
'0
tt
L&J~ "j;~
~zt~
:::s L&J U ~
L-IJJ h
r= 0:: <
Vl~
~
~q
General
Development
Plan
- -
l'\do!}t.(~d
RESIDENTIAL
MAX.
LNI) USE ACRES CUI AC lNTS
CQ Low 250.5 cr3 743
~ LowlMedilft1 P
389.6 :H; 2008
~ MIIdo6n 2422 6-11 1975 PO
~ Medu11fHltl 1254 11-18 1684
~ Hltl 11.0 18-27 + 250
SIb- T 011I 1018.7 8660
f\ION -RESI:lENTlAL L
LNI) USE ACRES PO
~ ReI8I *
51.8
~ p.....~& 8.8
Amnslra_
~ ~~actII'nIl 135.8
~ "'*' Space 187.6
~ PIAlIcI~ 137.8
~ PIrI<. & AlIa'-. 295.4
~ MaJCW Cl'aallol'l 214.7
SIb- T oIlIl 10302
~ FIA\n u--. 72.9
P\"oIKI T alai 2121.8 ac 8860 cIu
<II Candid.'. Cr.urc.. St..
(1)1 _ ........ OnIgMhOI'l: Pare.. ~ to tv.... General ~ JIIIan A..........,'
to De COMII,."t trim 1M QUa v.... GIner.. '*'
~ fASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO.
~inti ~
~,~~~~.! ~ ~
.~
I" ,_.......
:--
'","'...'
Exhibit 4
\
.
General
Development
Plan
-- -
- - -
i = !~(i f)~}St~(i
RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres du/ac Units
p
I~ 250.5 0-3 743
LM LowlMedium 381.0 PO
0-6 1903
M Medium 251.1 6-11. 2023
MH Medium/High 115.3 11-18. 1608
H High 11.0 18-27+ 250
Sub-Total 1008,9 6527
NON-RESIDENTIAL
Land Use Acres
C Retail 51.9
CoO Prof. & Admin. 6.8
I-R Res. & Ltd. Mfgr. 135.9
o Open Space 187.6
PQ Public/Quasi-Pub. 146.9
P Parks & Rec. 296.2
Major Circulation 214.7
Sub-Total 1040.0
~ Future Urban 72.9
Project Totals 2121.8
PO
.
6527
... C.ndt4lale CI'IurCft Site
11J) _ ~1ftI ~: "'-re.. ~l '0 fu.... o.neral ~f ~ ......,.,.,t
to De CQNIltent ...." ... CIUI V"'I GilfW81 "'n
~ fASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO,
~inti ~
~,~~~~~
~--....
I _ I...........
0"'_
/.
;
/ " //~ ~ --
/ ~/ ~;
Exhibit 4
Community
Structure
~ 6Ot.r ~Vr-re- Ii) 111Jt!7- f7+I1/tY #I7DB
\!...,
c(~ /l;w c I?rM (0 ClJ/crreF- tltJ{)f;YIJG 5I::6e
'i" ffllJlIr% IifM (5) SIIJ6I...f3 rlV1//...Y o('"C
\!.J
(t e~tWl5 !ttJlJt:IlJ6 t3'lA76
--)
~ E'ASTLAKE
n-, Cinti
~~ "_H"'"
- -
A PLANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO
-
/<;', /4(:,
Exhibit 5
2.4 Affordable Housing policy
The Chula vista Housing Element contains the following policy which
is applicable to EastLake Greens:
The City of Chula Vista expects every developer to address the
problem of housing low and moderate income families and
individuals. Where projects exceed fifty dwelling units, the
municipality expects the involved developers to explore
methods to provide a minimum of ten percent of said units to
low or moderate income housing. This program calls for the
developer's exploration and investigation of Federal and state
subsidy programs and other economically feasible means of
reducing the cost of housing.
The City of Chula Vista shall officially encourage residential
builders to provide a variety of housing types, and "balanced
communities" .
(8116/94ilJf~~ _ffi5"'
_J:-. j.....,.""
I /
CHAPTER THREE - CIRCULATION
3_1 Introduction
The circulation component of the EastLake Greens SPA Plan is
based on a comprehensive sub-regional traffic study which
determined the appropriate size and phasing of circulation
improvements.
3_2 Sub-Regional Network
Primary
Canyon
access
future
access
access to the proj ect will be provided by Telegraph
Road and Eas tLake Parkway or Hunte Parkway. Regional
is provided by I-80S, located west of the site. The
construction of SR 125 will provide additional north-south
for future traffic volumes.
Currently, Telegraph Canyon Road and EastLake Parkway exist,
having been constructed in conjunction with EastLake I.
Telegraph Canyon Road (Otay Lakes Road) extends further to the
east, past the Otay Lakes, as a two lane road. The initial
construction of Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue, within the
project site, will be phased with development of this SPA.
The traffic generated by the proposed development within the SPA
has been calculated using standard traffic generation rates.
These volumes have been distributed and added to projected future
volumes due to other development. The proposed circulation
system has been engineered to accommoda te these total future
volumes.
3.2.1
Route 125
In order to provide traffic capacity for the complete buildout of
EastLake, a maj or street wi thin the future corridor of State
Route 125 will need to be completed. This street may initially
be bui 1 t as a two to four lane divided road from the EastLake
boundary to State Route 54, and later widened to four to eight
lanes as a freeway.
An effort has been initiated to have CALTRANS undertake a
specific route location study for SR 125 from SR 54 to the Second
Border Crossing. Ul tima tely, it is anticipated that SR 1 25 may
be constructed to freeway standards if growth in the area so
warrants. Accordingly, any initial construction of a major
street within the Chula Vista planning area should be built to
State Standards for a freeway with respect to horizontal curve
radii, grades and rights-of-way. At grade intersections 'with
Telegraph Canyon Road, East "H" Street, EastLake Parkway and
Orange Avenue will be built initially; at some future time, grade
(3/1/89) I:rr~
//1 ~//!
separations will be necessary when the road is upgraded to a
freeway. Intersections wi thin EastLake Greens will be designed
to accommodate future grade separations. Sufficient space has
been reserved wi thin the SR-125 Right-of-way to accommodate a
"cloverleaf" intersection at Telegraph Canyon Road.
Ini tial right-of-way reserve for future SR-125 wi thin EastLake
Greens is shown in the Street Sections, also on Exhibit 6, and
can accommodate a possible future freeway.
3_3 Community Network
The proposed circulation facilities for the EastLake Greens SPA
are depicted in Exhibit 6. Sections, showing the number of lanes
and geometries of each street category, are also provided in the
Exhibit.
3.4 Private street
Some parcels wi thin the residential neighborhood of EastLake
Greens (e.g., Parcel R-2) may be developed as private communities
with gate guarded access to limit entrance to residents and their
guests only. In such a case, the streets within the parcel will
be private. However, they are to be built to meet public street
standards for paved section and other engineering criteria.
3_5 Phasing of Road Improvements
Phasing of community development with provision of adequate road
capacity and access improvements are fully described in the
Public Facili ties and Financing Plan. These improvements have
been phased and designed to maintain an adequate level of service
throughout the circulation system serving EastLake Greens.
3.6 Transit Planning Principles
The following principles should be followed in determining the
location of transit stops along planned transit routes in the
community and in designing the pedestrian system:
1 .
Where there are numerous major pedestrian generators,
access to stops for transit vehicles moving in both
directions would be facilitated by locating transit
stops near striped intersections.
2.
Transit stops should be located and walkways designed to
provide access as directly as possible without impacting
residential privacy.
3.
At intersection points of two or more transit routes,
stops should be located to minimize '....alking distance
between transfer stops.
(3/1/89)
111-2
.. //;/'~/~~;/
\'
\
\
__.1,
--------
,/"U_
,/'
('
i
I
I
6
+::
fT"( ~
~ :, ~
U Hill
t5 ~.~ '.' f
~~
<(" ::1
~;.,
i ~
~
~i ~ ~
Oiu.. a:
a:: it~' ~ ~
,0 2' ~ ~
:; cr ~ .-
-~ i
.. .
~
i; ~I;: !~:
l:l.. _ >- >-
. .. i (,)
~ - ~ ~ I.., :
. ~ J. --j a- r;;-- 0
rL:{ ) iLi::~ ·
~ ~ 1 i ~ 1:1
.., .. I~
lu : . '" ~ ~..; \
;W E.. I a: ~ _
;; ~LL'~Tef -- i'di
-- i ~;
% j :OJ
.
w
':
i.~. f
i
Ih ;
.
D
o
.
.
; ~
r. ci
I ; Ii
ii..
;j ...
"
!
i
.
Ii
!
.
.
.
~
2
~i
~j
o~
ii
"..
~!
z.
.... :'1
~~ ;;
U i i
,
o
-- -- ---
/" /"-
//
/y
A/
/
..(li'-4llf..",Cf
u.
/
/./
-'
e.. l..3
m
-'.
/A_
/ ./1
//
//
/,
/
" ,
~
EJ A
.E\n..~
\J.~ ~ i
"<
"':'J
<0
-
:0
1:
)(
UJ
I""
LU\IlZ f~
~ ~15
-q:LLI !6
-ILLI ~:
~~c(
Ul(,!)
~
~
4. Transit vehicle conflicts with automobile traffic can be
mitigated by locating bus turnouts at the far side of
intersections in order to permit right-turning vehicles
to continue movement.
5. Transit stops should be provided with adequate walkway
lighting and designed shelters.
6. Walkway ramps should be provided at transit stops to
ensure accessibility to the handicapped.
3.7 Bicycle Routes
A number of bikeways ~~~gl~t~Dg~ are planned for internal
circulation within EastLake. u.. TheUinternal bicycle system will
connect into exiting and planned regional bikewaJs- on
Telegraph Canyon Road. The proposed bikeway ~~gy,g,t; system is
shown in Exhibit 8, and further described below:
Class I Bikeway (Bike Path) .
The bike path is a completely separ:ated path apar:t fr:OIIl
the existing str: eet systelll desiglled to acconllllodate Ol&e
or: two way tr:affic.
Class II Bikeway (Bike Lanet:
A bike lane is an on-street facility designated by a
6-inch solid white strips to the right hand side of the
road. Bike lanes are designed for one-way travel in the
direction of traffic flow and are typically established
on both sides of the street except through
intersections.
All bikeways :~~g~ for EastLake should be designed and constructed
in accordance with CALTRANS' "Planning and Design criteria for
Bikeways in California" to comply with state standards.
3.8
Palomar Road
(3/1/89)
:rH-4
CHAPTER FOUR - PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE
4.1 Introduction
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides a well-balanced and
integrated system of parks and recreational opportunities. The
golf course and related facilities will be privately owned. Three
of the neighborhood parks are proposed to be privately owned and
maintained by a Master community Association. The community parks
to be located adjacent to the high school, will be dedicated to the
City and maintained by the City. The park adj aceht tolgi'mMIII the
elementary school site will be similarly dedicated and maintained
by the city. A total of 191.2 acres of recreation oriented land
is provided, not including school play fields. In addition, 26.6
acres of open space, primarily in slope areas and utility
easements, are designated.
4.2 Open Space
While generally accepted standards have been established for the
provision of acreage and the function of a hierarchy of parks, open
space is more difficult to quantify. Usually the need, amount and
location of open space is determined by the natural environmental
conditions of the land and facility related needs such as retention
basins, future road rights-of-way, and buffer space between
unrelated land uses, etc. Steep slopes and sloping lands with
unstable geologic conditions are obvious natural candidates for
open space, as are noise buffer areas along major traffic ways.
Open space areas within EastLake Greens are designated for buffer
areas along SR-125, Telegraph Canyon Road and Orange Avenue. The
water line/electrical transmission line easement crossing the
southwest portion of the site is also placed in the open space land
use category (see Exhibit 7).
Open space lands indicated as preserved on the EastLake Greens site
utilization Plan will be preserved through the dedication of open
space easements and/or lots to the City or other appropriate
agency, or to a Master Community Association. Uses will be
strictly controlled through zoning regulations (see Open Space
Districts in the EastLake I PC District).
(3/1/89 )(;11,13,1 I~Sl
- IVo~l
.// :/
/-"".,/,
/ /-' '"
4.3 Trails
The trails system proposed for the EastLake Greens SPA is depicted
in Exhibit 8, Trails Plan. The Community Trail provides a
connection between all the major focal points within the EastLake
Community including the residential neighborhoods in EastLake I,
EastLake Greens, EastLake Village Center, the high school and
community park, and Country Club. It extends north into EastLake
I and is poised to extend east into the next development area.
Pedestrian walks along vehicle circulation routes provide an
alternative circulation mode within the EastLake Greens neighbor-
hood.
The trails system depicted in Exhibit 8 provides the link between
residential areas and major activity centers such as parks,
schools,) shopping areas and work places through a network of
pleasant and safe off-street pathways. On-street bike patl.ls I~Iingli
are also shown in the Exhibit.
4.4 Golf Course
An 18-hole golf course and clubhouse are planned as the major
amenities and Neighborhood Center for EastLake Greens. The course
winds throughout the residential neighborhood providing visual an
open space amenities to many residential parcels and to those who
travel through the neighborhood.
The use of reclaimed water provided by the Otay Municipal Water
District for irrigation of the golf course landscaping will permit
heavy landscaping while also conserving water resources for
domestic uses. The use of reclaimed water will be subject to the
regulations of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and Health
Department.
A conceptual plan for the Country Club facility is presented in
Exhibit 9. The golf course and country club are proposed to be
privately owned and maintained.
4.5 community Park
The community Park was included in the EastLake I SPA Plan at a
proposed size of 14.9 acres. It is now shown as a 15.1 acre site
(Parcel P-1). The park is intended to serve the local community
and provide recreational services for eastern Chula vista
residents. The community park has been located adjacent to the
high school within the EastLake Greens neighborhood to provide the
opportunity for joint IlIaihtelJalJGe use by the City and the
Sweetwater Union High School District due to combined use of park
and high school facilities.
(3/1/89)
IV;';';
'5 -::/
(;rID I~ i
~~ '" . ..
5 '" ~
,.; -' ci g
~c. -< '" :!!
~(/) II
.. ~
~ i
c: 1i Q. 11
~ Q. I .. ~
j " .. !
1 ! ...J j
! -< I
0 ~ ...
0
...
$ ..
. ~ 0 LI c:
..
Q.
0 LI c:
..
0 LI E
~
l
1
8.
c:
..
.. Q
.c if c:
..
2 '" 0::
..
'"
..
,:
~
u
,..
.c
\
\'
,
------...._--~
----
/~//' -- ~--"I
/~. ,~
A,/
" ,/
~~
/,
// ,,/
,/ ',/
/ '/
-
f;~l .J/fo~
.....;'-,~/
EJ ~. ~ "'"
, .~....
~= ;0
.....1 OC~~ .s::.
C'~~ x
\J.....~.. w
c.. ~.
"gr
,,-
....l.l
LLI. ^ .&;~
~Zn
q:LLI U;
..... LLI ~ ~
~Q:: ~-
Ul<.!)
i:i5
~~"
c.
~ LLI"l ~~
i ~Z ~i
i n"LLI j~
~ ~LLlI~
i '^~~-
~ v......
~iii(!)
~ "~-I
/ /'~ \\
/,6;. · 'i02c-.\
/f~~~ ~~ ~/~~ O\~ I
/fif3 jj~, ~~~ !i 1?' f;"'~l' "~ ~ ~
/!~ r /!~=_~. \ <l<>~ ! I ;fl..~ ~ ";J ~ "',,~;::... ' 5~ !
//;.; ".~... ,~, > '~;;"'>-. .. ~ ;-y{/t- v ' )*,c;,,' . ~.v... \, \ ·
";0 ~,; .~ '>", l, 4Jfi.'/;,"",-- <,~""~"r'~ /0./~'" , , . c. 't!;, }...~~.. ';.\ :.
!(iJ j( L/ ffiw~? ~~~=C:.~---/ ~ 'Jf> :~\',/)~~~\- " >.
:'I/O .)/' \ ~~F, f...iia~. 0 ~\i!~}.'; ".. ' V-;" \~" ,',\~\ ~ H
'I iO' ~' _ ..:: \~. I - 0)- -,' ,~ - v- -"',Q\z ' ."
\ : 'n I \ ' , ,~ w _ ~, .;- / ," _J -,", .--~... ' "
'\\.... l ':,,__ ,.., ". (./. 'kll .,~\ \-,Ii:
'\., l.r1 \ I if' -. -. _.-/ I ;;C",~ ' J'" I . ,,: ,,'-' ^ r-.15I
,'~ \ ._ _ ." .~' ( \) / '.,~" IJ',~,'.\ \
\\ p r~"\,, t2Jlj _c ,~'~, '\' ~);;"f /,,,z~P)" J$i2~
\\\OB-J~ ,\!!u!~ ."~.-<CT-' '/--5'! IV/.j";:: c. ,i: './'y~ ,!.
..Ie,,".' _ _. ,', '. ,'(Q/ ., J )' ....
\ '\\' \..~:'\\ ~~ f~'''''~'' ~ ':'t> X .. ' 'c (j , / -. o:~3(~),..-,( c:
" \;:n. 'i\3;\~~(~~; '^', ~~~~~-o\~., ;~I')\'\" IJ ~~-"'--~" c~;JI
,"" ... . ""~ ,.'. . __ . . ' " ' Vc.- ,.....
:c. ~ \. < c ~, ~....\ ('<.' --;: ,/ FOli:/, - \11 I' I "'- ..~~ ~
. _.'" \ , ,'.' ' .. ... 'A \
\ i ~; " ~~.. y \" \:" ;/) ;1 01:1" \: ' " .~ lt2\ ','; lAV "
,. '" ,,\ ... ,'.'\ # 0." .\ " .,W I" I"Y \
'."t\ \ \" W'i . \s" : / t' 0 iJ, "\ \" /~';. '~6:6V '
\\~ ~ ~-=-~. :', / Ll)ol C :!I:'I-t-~c..i'!'/(? )~_ ~-' Cl'S'ft ~ ..~..~~ ;"00V' \
\'-> \<0'" ",' /" ' '" .. " · ,'''''w,V '
?\ ~ --c=:=...--:?,~~., ~ L...-// . :I'~I \ :~, ->::'"1 -'->..... ~ ' :.~r~ ~
\,,:<\ '" .' " I ..-,
. Vi' "".,". ' . _, Ai" .."". ~--_.
/~;;;.~.~:.;..:~;~ ~1t~iiiiiiii~ti~\jl'i~oiiiiiiii;iJiJiii"i-"i.~~'" 1(t><9/ _._._~..
o~~< _ o---'~!:J ':, / ~~ T
~; ..0 .... '1'10,;0-"'
,,&, \ .li 01.~.'.O"6"5~Y5'S15"o{.ib1roa-::t:. /~ I
~ \ . -g , Q~.:... :
\ ~ -...In';;::' ..... I
\ ; . ": -.//;:If.,......,,-
--7'-- ,. . ..0("1"'1 I
: "','" ~ E ;; __ i '-""'1 OJ
I'. ::>gQ. -- i;;/
/ ~< .~
-..0:. --... ::::. - c' ~
__~ ___~-_--~~ III
_~__-==-=_==---==_=-__ ~~ .,noli I j I
____:::::...-___... I:J
-=-==::=-:.....~ L-
i
c
ro
c:
en
~
r=
\
_/ ....--::..-\
.-c ---~-~
~'\
a.
o
Cii
u;
.,
!!'.
c
'0
ll.
..
u;
:>
5l
'5
o
u
o
o
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ii
~
..
;:
'10
>'=
"
0-
0"
.e"
~"
0..
rJ.e
{j,'"
'CP '
Z'"
.,i;;
","'"
:s m
8~
~'m
0':
o-
j
W
~
fID
.
:...
m
~
.~-g en
~~ 9
=E~ >-
~'; ..
5i ~
ut; ffi
"'"
0;
E
1J
c:
..
..J
"'"
0;
E
"
c:
..
..J
c:
.~
;;;
Q)
"0
Q)
c..
o
'iG
::E
o
c:
~
o
Q
Q
o
o
o
/-~;
//
"S'
CD
-
:c
:E
)(
w
1
i
!
.
t
!
I
!
I
i
10
L:.J
EJ
110 I/) ~
i ~ Ol '
01 ,IC
~ 0':'':'
15 .... ....""
Golf Course Viewpoint/Rest Stop
ALTERNATE WITH TREUJS & BENCH
\/EWPOIoITIREST STOP
LotlFence line subject to review
YEW FENCElWAll
II' .-t cor.M.HTY WAll
18llEYARO WAll)
Typical Golf Course Viewpoint/Rest Stop
Trail Entering Golf Course
_ m<IL
~
g
~~
if "
~ g
'" '"
w w
~ ~
I!! 51
IjII!!
;tl!!
;t ~ IjI
~ ~ ~
~ Co.o
(~*~
'... .'r .... ".
~ ."
20'
...
8' WDE CONCRETE
~mAL
8' I<<3H CCIMM.NTY WAll
(SIlEYARD WALU
mAL MARKER
CONCRETE WAlK
Cross Section A-A
Trail at Public Street
VEIN
,..--,.
I.-I
~ >li[
/ ":1 /
:"1 /'
'4/""
CL,
--;, -.{-
1
VEIN FealWAI.1.
~ EXJSfflG l.AN)SCAPI'lG
/ ~8' WIlE CONCRETE ~ mAL
<.=::::-.. }
v_s
n~
e'
J TO GQF cor
Cross Section B-B
/..
/ ~
-/ "';-/.
./ .~,- - "--
Exhibit Bb
~
c.
CD
'-'
c
o
o
..c
:::s
C3
~
~
~
c
:::s
o
()
...-------
~ W~JO~ ~
________ ~ ~p.~~'flp.~ fi:::.. ~ Z f~ ~
-- r24-/ ~ -=::rLIJ ~~ w
-- "U~i~ ~~ ...J ~5
"" I-LIJ 2:
,",' :.. Ui~ <
::is
~'"
)
(
/ <'. -,/'"
/ ~ - ~/
'"
~ ~
5: ~
I
nil
UI
The community park is intended to provide facilities to accommo-
date organized group field sports, picnicking and other active
recreational activities. The location of the park adjacent to the
high school will permit joint off-street parking as well as field
areas for high school physical education programs.
4.6 Neiqhborhood Park sites
Four Neighborhood Parks are shown wi thin the EastLake Greens
residential neighborhood (Parcels P-2 through P-S). Three are
located along the residential collector streets while one is
located adj aceht to 1:g!it::n'lilil'~1' the elementary school site in the
Activity corridor, adjacent to EastLake Parkway. The three internal
parks are proposed for private ownership and use, while that in
the Activity Corridor will be publicly owned and maintained. The
private parks are intended to provide additional recreational
opportunities for residents, independent of the golf course and
country club facilities.
4.7 Public Park compliance
New development is required to provide public parkland, improved
to city standards, and dedicated to the city, based on establish
ed standards. The dedication requirements are specified in section
17.10.040 of the Chula vista Municipal Code. The dedication
requirement for EastLake Greens is shown in Table 2.
The table indicates that the project will provide park land in
excess of that required. In addition to the provision of park
land, the ordinance specifies a standard level of improvement to
be provided. Improvements provided by the developer which exceed
this standard will be credited to the project. Excess land or
improvements provided may be credited as land, improvement cost, or
any combination thereof, using the provisions of the ordinance to
determine equivalence.
4.8 Park and open Space Implementation
All of the open space, private and public parks will be controlled
through select open space easements and/or dedication to the city.
Maintenance of the public community park will be provided by the
City. Access controls and maintenance of the golf course and club
house facilities will be the responsibility of the operator and
independent of the homeowners association. Maintenance of private
parks and open space areas will be provided by property owners
through homeowner associations or similar mechanisms. Open Space
and/or Landscape maintenance Districts may be established to ensure
proper management and operation of public right-of-way
improvements.
(3;1/a9)n~J17/9~) .~'
)" ,,,., ..:,.
TABLE 2
EastLake Greens
Parkland Dedication standards
DWELLING TYPE PARKLAND/DU DU/PARK ACRE
Single Family 423 sfjdu 103 dujac
AttachedjPUD 366 sfjdu 119 dujac
Duplexes 325 sfjdu 134 dujac
Multiple-family 288 sfjdu 151 dujac
Based upon the parkland dedication standards, the following
requirements will apply to EastLake Greens SPA:
No. of DU
Acres
Type of unit
Park Area/DU
Total Park
19~4* ..
Single Family
AttachedjPUD**
Duplex
Multi-family
:m'Q.l..i
423
366
325
288
sfjdu
sfjdu
sfjdu
sfjdu
i:"9--;-6
'6-;-8-
0.8
110
"",.. i:)n"":a~~Q
2871 du a7.~a
26.6
ac:;
*Includes 'i&S-4S du with Interim Designation of SFD.
**Assumed "type of unit" for AttachedjPUD includes SFD Condos. Actual Parkland
required for SFD Condos may vary from the above and will be determined at the
Design Review andjor tentative map processing stage.
projected*
Parcel Park Type
Acres
% Credit*
Acres
P-1
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
Community Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park
Neighborhood Park
Golf Coursejpublic
Trails
15.1
3.2
tl-;-frll.8
3.7
~3.0
85.4%
50.0%
~%g~,~
50%
50%
12.9
1.6
1.9
---r-;-=r
1.1
100%
1.1
TOTAL CREDIT
Projected Excess Park Credit
*Actual Park Credit will be based on units developed and the Final Park
be ap roved the Director of Parks & Recreation.
ere'....
on"
(8j16j94){lt]119S)
Iv--B
')
Private open space areas and slopes within "common interestll resi-
dential proj ects will be designated common areas and maintained
by homeowners I associations. For detached residential proj ects,
major open space slopes will be a single lot or lots, with open
space easements prQtecting the slopes from development.
(3/1/89)
--~
-",' // (- (
CHAPTER FIVE - PUBLIC FACILITIES
5.1 Introduction
The comprehensive plan for public facilities is a distinguishing
feature of the EastLake Greens SPA Plan. This portion of the
plan outlines the necessary public facilities to enable the com-'
muni ty to function property. The companion Public Facilities
and Financing Plan for EastLake Greens describes the "backbone"
facili ties in more detail and assigns the responsibility for
financing all required facilities.
Facility needs and locational requirements have been identified
and capacities have been determined based upon projected land
uses and their distribution.
5_2 Roads
A comprehensive plan of streets and highways to provide
vehicular access into and within EastLake is described in
Chapter Three. The Public Facilities Financing Plan details
their phasing and financing.
5_3 Domestic Water Supply
EastLake is loca ted wi thin the boundaries of the Otay Water
District (OWD), which is responsible for providing local water
service. Otay is a member of the County Water Authority and the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
The ultimate average annual domestic water demand for EastLake
Greens SPA is estimated to be 1.99 mgd, as calculated in Table
3. The golf course will be irrigated with reclaimed water and
is not expected to contribute to the domestic water demand un-
less sufficient reclaimed water is not available. The Domestic
Water Plan, Exhibit 10, depicts the water service system
proposed for EastLake Greens.
The EastLake Greens SPA will be served from the 980 I elevation
reservoir and pump station constructed as a part of EastLake I.
Minimum pressures of 40 psi during peak hour flow and 20 psi
during fire flow conditions will be maintained in the on-site
domestic water distribution system wi thin the project. Design
fire flows used in sizing the water system are shown on Table 4.
(3/1/89)
~'
.m~
~lr
~
~
~
Is
i .
~ .! 0
~ ..J _
~ Is "
_ .t
1 Is ~ j
~ .... i ~ ~ .
.. ~. i ~ N ~I
01 ~ !
t~ ~ N "2 '01
N" w ~ ... Ie
i~ ....i 1;
-:: ~ 1- Q
"- ....0 l
"'.... r: ~H
n ~i j 1(
w .
w_ w_
1
N
~ i
Jl 1;
~ ..
01
N U
.... "....
H "'-
j';;
01 U
i_
I
I
.
I
I
I
-
la-<l
--- ---7
/,...- ;-
/?/
.// .
/\//
,/ /--
//
/
//
/
/--
.J
J
/i
-/
E];
....\ ~!. ~
t:H
\).... ~i
...
..J,
Q
-
:0
:c:
X
w
LLlUl i~
~ZJ
SltIu
~~<
Ul(,!)
~
~
TABLE 3
EastLake Greens SPA
Domestic Water Demand
'"
LAND USE
UNITS
DEMAND FACTOR DEMAND (mgd)
Residential ~~~X'2.9, '744 persons
village Center/ 36.7 ac
Public & Quasi-Public
Parks (net 28.0 ac
irrigated)
Schools (net 26.0 ac.
irrigated)
180 gal/capita
2799 gal/ac
3 feet/year
2.5 feet/year
i:-;-1-51J.~:~~
.10
.08
~
;~;tf,~~ mgd
TABLE 4
EastLake Greens SPA
Fire Flow standards
LAND USE
FIRE FLOW (9pm)
Residential
Low Density
High Density
village Center
High School
1500
3500
5000
4000
The basic objective in planning water facilities for EastLake
Greens is to maximize the flexibility and efficient use of
existing and planned improvements with respect to project needs
and costs.
Major supply facilities for EastLake Greens include all
distribution mains of 12 inches or larger, and all transmission
mains, booster pumping stations and water storage facilities. A
detailed analysis of the total water supply requirements and
planned improvements is contained in the EastLake Greens Water
System Subarea Master Plan prepared by NBS/Lowry.
(3/1r.g9)rI:9~~~~
V-~-
,. - / \./
, ,
.
5_4 Reclaimed Water Supply
Reclaimed water is available for irrigation purposes from Otay
Water District IS Jamacha Wastewater Reclamation Plant. These
facilities are currently providing reclaimed water to the SDG&E
Miguel Substation for irrigation purposes.
A 20-inch reclaimed water supply line was constructed in
conj unction wi th the EastLake Employment Center on Lane Road
from the northerly EastLake boundary to Telegraph Canyon road.
This pipeline will be extended north to the reuse area and tied
into the existing OWO storage ponds. This reclaimed water
pipeline can then supply the demands shown in Table 5 in
EastLake Greens and other portions of the community.
TABLE 5
EastLake Greens SPA
EastLake Reclaimed Water Demands
FLOW
EASTLAKE GREENS ACRES COEFFICIENT DEMAND (AFY)
OS-6 & 7 10.8 2.0 feet/yr. 22
Golf Course Turf 130.0 3.5 feet/yr. 455
Golf Course Slopes 30.6 2.5 feet/yr. 77
TOTAL GREENS 554 ac-ft/yr
Other EastLake Areas
Employment Park
9.0
3.0 feet/yr.
27
TOTAL OTHER
27 ac-ft/yr
The proposed reclaimed water distribution sys.tem to serve these
uses is shown on Exhibit 11. It should be noted that the system
is sized to accommodate future reclaimed water uses in
development areas to the east of EastLake Greens. There are
also some additional irrigation demands such as the school sites
that could potentially be served with reclaimed water instead of
domestic, but these have been included in the domestic system.
(3/1/89)
V=-4f
// / ~
il
'~;::~~ " j
A~' ~\\ II
4<-/' ~~\i'
. <~~~
"~~"
~\
\~\
,~
\\\
\\\t
\'\1
'~\t
\\\6
III
,\'\ \
\'
.// , \ i ,
,/" . "I
;'/ ---~ '
/y:/ /-~----------
~/ Y
", k~ ~~~~~:5/ ( /;::::_---)
~- -~-- - . /y
'".- - ~c~-l' 1 "/
-~- I-I _ . //
\ l " /'''':-
~...-~ ;;,..... ~ /
----~~'"':.........'" . ----........
- -- -""<:::c:::::-.c1f-
r
I
-- --'----1-
~
j
i j
j } }
i I I
~ ll: ll:
III
p. JL
III III
q
:t
:E
c;j
S
- I,\~~
\\ - ~,::>, -
_:\ i-_l~~"~;~,:_< ._, '-
t
------........\
/ ~
I
z
t
o
I
!
o
!
;;
~
j
}
----' '-
.// /
\//
/.
/ /
/./
/-
J
" (: ~:..)
-,e,.....
E~; i
.....\ ~~. ~ :E
~ 'g ~ )(
\J..... ~i w
".
..J,
~~~
LLlZ i~
~LLI u15
SLLI ~~
~~c(
Ul{!)
~
~'I
5.5 Waste Water Facilities
EastLake Greens SPA is divided into three separate drainage basins.
These drainage basins are (1) Telegraph Canyon; (2) Salt Creek; and
(3) Poggi Canyon. Telegraph Canyon is the largest basin within the
Greens. The majority of EastLake Greens will sewer to the existing
City of Chula vista 15-inch trunk sewer in Telegraph Canyon Road.
Only one parcel, R-9, drains naturally to Poggi Canyon down Orange
Avenue. This parcel will be pumped on an interim basis to the Salt
Creek basin.
One alternative under consideration for the area tributary to Salt
Creek, the southeastern portion of EastLake Greens, is to pump it
back into the Telegraph Canyon basin and make improvements
downstream to accommodate the additional flows. Another
alternative would be construction of an on-site water reclamation
plant, appropriately configured to minimize growth inducing
impacts, in Salt Creek southeast of the SPA. A third alternative
would be to sewer it down a new trunk sewer to the Otay River
Valley and then westerly in the Otay River Valley to the City's
existing collection system.
The ultimate average wastewater flow for EastLake Greens SPA is
.912 mgd as shown on Table 6.
TABLE 6
EastLake Greens SPA
Average Wastewater Flow
LAND USE
UNITS
FLOW COEFFICIENT
80 gal/capita
2500 gal/acre
1500 gal/acre
20 gal/student
15 gal/student
.ELQH (mgd)
~,?~7-;-9-8-&
.049
.026
.048
.....Q..Q..9.
Residential '6,71$9,744 persons
Village Center 19.6 acres
Public/QP 17.1 acres
High School 2,400 students
Elementary Sch. 600 students
TOTAL
!~~J~~-;-9-l-Z mgd
The planned wastewater collection system for EastLake Greens SPA is
shown on Exhibit 12. The interim pump station at Hunte Parkway and
Telegraph Canyon Road will allow the development of the first phase
of EastLake Greens and defer the need for the off-site sewer down
Salt Creek and Otay River Valley or the on-site water reclamation
plant until the later phases of EastLake Greens development.
The interim pump station to serve parcel R-9 will be abandoned when
an off-site trunk sewer is extended up Orange Avenue.
(3/1189)tm~~;?)
u
') <..- ;;' '<-
, ,
,,",' "-
4'" . .",.\.
,,~
.~:x.
\..\
- -~ \\\
\\'1\
'Ii \
\\"t
\. \ ~
;{\
, \,.. ..
\ \.
\.
\,
// / 'w, \ :- ,
, ,/-------------
y..... --/
(,
I
<JJ>
I ~ I
~ I
I a I
0
en ~ j j ~ j i
~ 0; !
~ ~ 2 ~ I
o _
~ ~ '" "
li. w i
.
~ I I . ~
i _<if I
! .
.
J!2
~
U,..'
...
r
~
----.--7
././ /~
~/
/.,/
'.</
/'/
,/./
...--...--
----
~
,,/ /'
//
/ /
/./
;/
~~ --------
Illl .~
I
~I
J '_
...
/(-
~/
/-
/
,/ /
/ t//
:I
EJ i
.....\~~[
1i\r-
C\I
or'
-
:0
:E
><
w
~J;~
~zh
SttiU
~~<
Ul<.!)
;:is
~
~
a::
. I
!
~
.. r
-i J
<!5 . ..
g ;; ~
B "
OJ i
: I ~ ~
g i ,
It It ~ ~
<;
f 1 r
i
~ I
j
~
~
.sa
~
E
~
o
CiS
!';.:--..::~~,
"~,'
?'. "
,.
;$:'/'.7. ,- .
/ / /,
;..-::: I
"" ~,~.'
, ,
ill'
I:
-1" .-..____~ ! _
" /
;- .- .
\'
\ I
" i- I
" l'
" -----
/:_------
. ,/, /';:---7
~./ t
fA,/ I
"f' >5./
"" ,~./
-'-~---:..---t--- -'::''---
-"-r
,
.
~
-/.
/
/'
/\,/
-' "/'
/' /'
//
/ '/
/0/
.'~.
.J '_
~
1.- "
-'!~
E~~=:
.....I~~~ :a
.... 'c~ .c.
.5 lij~ x
\J~i w
<Go
...J.
LJJ~ U
~LJJ u15
SUJ ~~
~~c(
lilt.!)
~
...~
5.6 storm Water Drainage
The storm drain system proposed for the EastLake Greens SPA is
illustrated in Exhibit 13. On-site runoff is collected in the
depicted system, detained in several locations, and. discharged
to undeveloped off-site areas to the east, south, and west.
5_7 Schools - General
One objective of the EastLake Greens SPA Plan is to provide the
schools necessary to serve community needs in a manner which
relates directly to the planned neighborhood structure of the
proj ect. The location of schools is intended to contribute to
the sense of community, provide reduced maintenance costs with
combined school/park complexes, and provide flexibility to
respond to changing student populations as the community
matures.
The EastLake Greens SPA is located within the Sweetwater Union
High School District and the Chula Vista City School District.
The Board of Trustees of the Sweetwater Union School District
and the Board of Education of the Chula Vista Ci ty School
District have each formed Communi ty Facili ties (Mello-Roos)
Districts for the purpose of financing school facilities within
EastLake Greens through the use of special taxes and the
issuance of bonds.
5_7_1
Elementary Schools
One e lemen tary school site has been provided in the EastLake
Hills neighborhood, north of East "HI! Street in EastLake I. A
second site is to be provided in the EastLake Greens neighbor-
hood.
The EastLake Greens SPA provides a 10.0 acre site, Parcel S-2,
along EastLake Parkway, but accessed from the internal loop
collector. This school is currently scheduled for construction
when enrollment in the first EastLake elementary school reaches
approximately 900 students. The site will be reserved for
acquis i tion by the school district, as provided in the Public
Facilities Financing Plan.
5_7.2
Secondary Schools
The Sweetwater Union School District provides secondary educa-
tion for the area. Existing schools in the area include Bonita
Vista High School and Junior High School, both located near the
intersection of East "H" Street and Otay Lakes Road.
(3/1/89) ~
./ ~ ,~// :/7
Available capacity in the secondary school system is projected
to be filled soon. A si te for a new high school to serve
students from EastLake and other projects in the vicinity has
been reserved within the EastLake Greens SPA. The 49.2 acre
site, Parcel S-1, is located along EastLake Parkway, adjacent to
the Community Park.
Construction of this facility is also subject to the provisions
of the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
5.8 Police and Fire Service
Both police and fire services are provided by the City of Chula
Vista, EastLake Greens SPA is east of police patrol beat 32,
which is currently served by one patrol car 24 hours a day.
Al though no new police facilities will be necessitated by the
project, an expansion of personnel and equipment will be neces-
sary to service project residents.
5.9 Library Service
The City operates a central library, which is located at 4th and
"F" Streets in central' Chula Vista, to serve the entire com-
muni ty. Growth in eastern Chula Vista raises questions as to
how 1 ibrary s erv ice is to be provided wi thin the Eastern
Territories and in what locations. Smaller branch libraries or
a large facility to serve the area east of I-80S merit considera-
tion.
A Library Service Master Plan has recently been completed which
suggests a branch library in the eastern area of the City should
be considered. Rancho del Rey SPA I, a recently approved pro-
ject approximately one mile to the west of EastLake, reserves a
site for a City library along East "H" Street. In addition, the
EastLake Village Center Master Tentative Map reserves a 1 acre
site for a library within EastLake I.
(3/1/89)
V::..:~.
-;
/ -//
... /'
CHAPTER SIX - COMMUNITY DESIGN
6.1 Community Character
All aspects of the development shall be subject to full design
review including architecture, site planning, landscaping, sign-
ing, grading and land use and zoning review. These guidelines
are intended as a guide for the development of the site as con'-
trasted to absolute standards.
6.2 Grading
The' Grading Plan is intended to provide a preliminary grading
concept, identification of slope banks and maintenance provi-
sions.
1 . General: The preliminary grading design is as indi-
cated on the Grading Concept, Exhibit 14. Final detail
design should reflect the following:
a.
Standards, General: Grading
Greens shall be subject to
Excavation, Grading and Fills
Code.
wi thin EastLake
Chapter 15.04
of the Municipal
b. Grading Design: It is the intent of this SPA that
graded areas will be contoured to blend with
natural landform characteristics. Rounding both
vertical and horizontal intersections of graded
lanes, obscuring slope drainage structures with a
variety of plant material massing, incorporating
the use of variable slope ratios for larger slope
banks, use of landscape planting for erosion con-
trol and to obscure man-made banks, and other
similar techniques should be used. Artificially
appear ing s lope banks with rigid angular charac-
teristics should be avoided.
2. Slope Banks:
a.
Cut and Fill Slope Construction: Slope banks in
excess of five feet in height should be construc-
ted at a gradient of 2 to 1 (horizontal to verti-
cal) or flatter unless otherwise approved by the
City Engineer.
b.
Erosion Mitigation: According to actual field
conditions encountered, erosion potential on
slopes should be reduced with berms at the tops of
all slopes; paved interceptor ditches and terrace
drains; and vegetation. Vegetation should consist
(3/1/89)
~.
/.':'
s
~
c
<
~
EJ! ::
!l :c
.E\'i~~ ~
fi~i w
\J~J
~
)~~..
~'" ""
~.. !~""..~
'./ ---",
/. -: '-...' ,
/, '/ ". ,
~/ "~"..... /
// '~.'
.L. )'~
!/ f/~'-- :____~
. /
//
.~
....:'\,
...,!. \.~
". ./.~v:'-- \~,
r' \x'
4 ~0 ~.~
~ (" '~\:..."
/,'./' '. '.... '\~~
#'/ ..~~..... '~),
~? "'''\..\
. ~ ~, ~.
' ,/ ''('... '''<' \
/ ~'-'~
// ~'. '. \.
~ ~ \ \
~ '~1. \
'7 ", \
,"v ll, I
LI \
W \ \
. \
,J./ \ \
1./ r. \
\
1
I
>
;/
A
,'\..,. \ \, l~!\
\ " i\
!~ \ \'
\ (~!~ -~ - - -=-'--', .:
- --- ! ,- ---
<'\=-- ~-<.;,,:- - - - ---~<,,>
\
\
.:....-\\~---~..
-=- , \:::......._~-----
/.//
,/
/..-
//
, \
l
I
---- .1 I
,.- .1
/ -~-j ! LIJ\ll J;~
. ( ,;:;;;::>-7/ ~Z t~
I v/-,..oKO. ~ '15
-_1 :::.:;:::5/ /1):/ q"LLlLIJ i~
"-~t ,:/ ~~!..
I/y Ul11\
- - - --_.J~ --i/ ~\.:.I
- -' --~"",."-- - -.f I
-------
~
~
/
,/
~/
/f/
/:/
./
.;:i-
-y
- ----
- - -..::::r.=--
')
:;:/;
of drought-tolerant native or naturalized species,
requiring little or minimal irrigation, deep
rooted and well sui ted to the particular soil.
Spray on applications and coatings, j ute or hemp
mesh are effective in stabilizing soils. Final
plans should be based on the coordinated input of
a licensed landscape architect.
c. Maintenance: The application of any grading
permi t should provide assurance acceptable to the
Ci ty Engineer' that lands caped slope banks will
have adequate maintenance to ensure continued
viabili ty of landscaping. Generally, except for
private lots, slope banks which exceed ten feet in
height should be maintained by a homeowners' or
property owners' association.
6.3 Building Scale and Variety
Buildings within the development should have a variety of sizes,
shapes, colors and materials used to promote interest in the
built environment. A portion of the Village Center (within
EastLake I) may be stacked residential units to give the center
of the community a distinguishing focal point. Parcels designat-
ed R-MH and R-H on the General Development Plan will also con-
tain stacked residential units.
6.4 General Landscape Concept
The purpose of the General Landscape Concept is to provide a
comprehensive framework for individual site landscape plans. It
will assure that all individual projects will conform to an over-
all landscape scheme which will result in a totally planned land-
scaped community.
The General Landscape Plan, Exhibit
design framework which allows latitude
individual project while maintaining the
tives of the community.
1 5, provides a general
and flexibility to each
overall goals and objec-
6.4.1
Landscape Components
The intent of the landscape concept is to reinforce the design
pattern established by the Land Use Plan. This pattern consists
of a residential district and an Activity Corridor/Village
Center District enhanced by a series of paths, edges and land-
:narks. Dominant trees have been selected to create distinct
identities and visual continuity.
a. District Concept - Each district or neighborhood shall
have a dominant tree.
"
(3/1/89)
V~
/,,<
/ "
,/ .,..-;. ""/
'" /,,/ --';
~
i ..
~ ~ ~
~ ~ J i i i
"'J.g ~.Ii j""
:; .. --~
Ii t:
... .. t5 ~
UgO<;J ! ~ !
~r;~Dg jj'@0i~~ I-
:JJa ~t wf ~~
~ j !
3l
8
~
j
--.....,
\
....'\
.~
\\
~
--~<:4~~ !
.~ . \ \
-~~ ( \'
#<r , ..... .'
..443. . ~"---- \ ":
~~_'/ . -----___1'
.~~ .(
, ~~. i
~3J Sl rl.o 1-- -::.::
.n".~q.l
.'} EO., ,,~' I
// c3 -.......::'Z ~ - -
~r'=i"{=~~~_J.. . i>'.
'_ ffi .,,!i-- ":i ~._ I //
---..-..-,--~~:J~i---=-,/' -
___--~J
/;_____-----i ~
../:(/. I~
/./ '
</
/
/-
/ // /
... , /
/ -
/ - )
/ ...
/
E-, ~~ LO
_ CIl ,....
~ i~ ~
'C\~~~ .c
CO;:".' .-
.__ 1ii" s::::.
t'~i ~
\Jj~
~2U
q:LU 0"5
..... LU j~
lil~ <
~~
~
b. Paths - The hierarchy of paths is as follows:
The thematic corridor provides the common thread
to link the various community elements together.
The thematic corridqr will have its own dominant
tree.
Major thoroughfares (e.g., SR-125 and Telegraph
Canyon Road). A separate dominant tree will be
used in the median.
Major internal streets within a district. The
dominant tree for the district will apply.
Supplemental trees may be introduced to provide con-
tras t and a transition into surrounding areas. This
landscape approach will provide strong visual direc-
tions and connections throughout the site, while provid-
ing the necessary contract to create an inteJ:esting
experience as one travels through the community.
c. Edqes - Edges will be strongly defined by landscaping.
This will create the appropriate delineation of one
district or area to another.
d. Entries - These are common points of entry and signifi-
cant intersections. The hierarchy of entries is as
follows:
Community Entry
Neighborhood Entry
A tree which differs from the adjacent path and
district trees will be to provide a distinct accent
statement and sense of arrival at entries.
e. Landmarks - Each landmark, whether major or minor, will
have a distinct landscape character (similar to the
district concept). As an example, all parks may have a
common theme tree, so that parks are easily recognized
and highlighted throughout the community.
The entire EastLake Community shall be designed to include a
well-balanced landscape palette. Plant material intensity
classifications will vary from highly manicured areas to
naturalized and native areas. These classifications are
mapped in Exhibit 16, Landscape Intensity Classifications.
(3/1/89)
-~'
R-7" -'
"~) ,.- / ")
6.4.2
Landscape and Irrigation Standards
Landscape and irrigation installation shall conform to the City
of Chula Vista Landscape Manual. Standard details will be
followed to assure uniformity and a h,igh quality of materials-
and workmanship. Materials and equipment shall be standardized
for ease of maintenance and storage. Reclaimed water should be
considered wherever safe and feasible.
6.4.3
Landscape Maintenance
Maintenance responsibili ties are intended to be assigned as
follows:
a. Individual Private Property Owner Maintenance
The individual property owner will be responsible for
maintaining landscaping within privately owned areas.
b. Homeowner Association Maintenance
The majority of landscape maintenance responsibility
will be with the Homeowner Associations. These associa-
tions will maintain all landscape areas not maintained
by the private property owner or a public agency.
These areas include all common areas such as private
recreation areas, including the private golf course,
common open space, street and entry landscaping. Land-
scaping in street medians and exterior slopes shall be
maintained by a Landscape Maintenance District.
Specific maintenance responsibilities will be determined with
tract map approval.
6_4_4
Landscape Intensity Classification
Landscape areas have been classified based on their intensity of
maintenance and water requirements (see Exhibit 16). These
classifications are generally described as follows:
a. Native Areas - These are existing vegetated areas undis-
turbed by construction operations. Natural rainfall
only is required for irrigation. Periodic clean-up and
grubbing of seasonal growth may be required.
b. Naturalized Areas - These are newly planted areas pro-
vided wi th temporary irrigation systems. Once plants
become established, they shall be capable of surviving
with no artificial irrigation.
c. Drouqht Tolerant Areas - These are newly planted areas
provided '....ith permanent irrigation systems. Water
demand will be low, requiring substantially less irriga-
tion than ornamental areas.
(3/1/89) 'JI--==6'
E--, ~~ co
-- ......
.~ A2_
......\ ~~'~ :0
c: .cS .-
\)......;~ ~
E:~ X
-gf W
jj
~
+-'
.~
+-'
J;
"i!
.:l
!
Ii
.;
j
i
~
i J i
~~I
...J
~...
ill
\
\ LI
-----___-1: !
~
---,.
/:>~~~~C?... ~~ t;
c:v /> SLLl1~
/.P/ ~~ ~~
~~
~I
4' - /',/"7
d.
Ornamental Areas - These are areas and corridors with a
high degree of visual impact. Plant materials will
require regular maintenance and watering.
e.
Manicured Areas These are ornamental areas that
require "special" attention due to their significance.
6_5
Exterior Fencing
Placement of communi ty fencing is illustrated in Exhibit 17.
The need for and location of all fencing shall be established
through Site Plan Review for those projects required to complete
such review (indicated by II *11 on the exhibit). The community
fencing locations designated in Exhibit 17 will be evaluated in
that review. If it is determined that a fence is to be provided
at the indicated locations, it shall conform to the community
design standard. If no fence is required, none need be
constructed.
Exterior fences should be provJ.oe along maj or roadways based
upon the following guidelines:
1 . Walls should be made of a textured surface material
tha t is compatible with the design of the neighborhood
area.
2. The monotony of a long wall should be broken-by visual
relief through periodically recessing the wall or con-
structing pilasters.
3. Landscaping, such as trees, shrubs or vines, should be
used to soften the appearance of the wall.
4.
Walls which serve as
should be up to six
finished grade.
a subdivision exterior boundary
feet in height from the highest
5. Walls used as rear or side yard walls should be con-
structed up to six feet In height depending upon the
conditions that exist.
6. Combined solid fencing, walls and open fencing may be
used to crea te interest. Masonry walls are required
only where necessary for noise attenuation.
7. Fencing design should avoid long continuous runs.
Jogging the fence line to avoid monotony is encouraged.
8. Earth berms to substitute and supplement the fencing
should be used whenever practical.
9. Sound wall fencing, where required, should be used to
mitigate adverse noise impacts on residential units.
(3/1/89)
V.::I:=::8
~7('
~"... // /}
~
"~
~
..
&>
"'.
i i j ~
....~li
! j =1
· >- ~i
! f II
c3 ~ ~i
II.
o
j~
ii
==
e.!
Ji
vo
<=
"-
l'i
i!
0<
00
.:
=0
.~
~~
i;
~i
~;
uii
~~
___--./ L..
/
'//
//
/,">
//
/
--- ,/'/~
---1,-:"
// /]
/;;;7
EJ!
A
.....\OO~~
e'H
\J.....~i
os.
...lJ
"
'r"
-
:0
:c
)(
w
LLI!l) ~i
~Z~~
::5LL1 ~~
L-LUb
r=~ c(
Ul~
~
~
10. Landscape planting should be used to supplement and
soften fencing and obscuring long lengths of fence with
vines and shrubs is encouraged.
6_6 Signage
The purpose of a planned sign program is to provide a continuity
of design which will contribute to an integrated, well-planned,
high quali ty environment. . All signs with the EastLake Greens
SPA will be designed and constructed in accordance with the
standards of the comprehensive sign program which has been pre-
pared for the EastLake Planned Community. Community and neigh-
borhood entry sign locations are identified in Exhibit 18.
6_6_'
Permanent Signs
Permanent signs include:
a. Community Entry signs
Entry signs should be a large scale, monument type
sign, creating a major statement. Materials used
should be compa tible wi th landscape and hardscape
elements. Entry sign could be illuminated.
b. Neighborhood Entry signs
Neighborhood
materials and
treatment.
entry sign
styling to
should rela te its use of
the neighborhood thematic
c. Identification Signs for parks, libraries, schools,
etc.
Sign should be low key, monument type sign, with single
or double face. Materials will be consistent with the
thematic treatment for the major neighborhood or
district in which it exists.
d. Street Name Signs
A sign to identify street names and inform the viewer,
through symbolic graphics, that it is a street within
EastLake. The EastLake theme logo, colors, and letter-
style will be used.
e. Community Trail Signs
A sign to identify and direct traffic, vehicular and
pedestrian, to special community trails such as
bicycling and jogging. Form should be small scale,
freestanding, consistent with community signs.
(3/1/89)
VL~-m
~) - / ;J//
6.6.2 Temporary signs
Temporary signs will be used to identify and direct traffic to
specific neighborhoods and products during construction and sales
periods. These signs will be subject to permit approval for
specific periods of time.
Temporary signs include:
a. Neighborhood/Product Directional Signs
A sign to direct vehicular traffic to specific neighborhoods
and/or products in the context of the merchandising program.
Constructed of painted plywood panels on wood support posts.
b. Product Identification signs
A sign to identify a specific residential product, sales
complex or informational center.
c. Secondary Directional Signs
A small sign to direct the viewer to specific areas within a
product such as parking, sales office and models. Consisting
of painted plywood panel(s) on wood support posts. Installed
with bottom of sign not more than 12 inches above finished
grade.
d. Future Facility Sign
A sign which informs the viewer, through symbol and verbal
reinforcement, of the various future building sites in
EastLake indicating opening dates, building names and phone
numbers. They consist of painted plywood sign panels supported
on wood posts.
6.7 Design, orientation and Setbacks - single Family Detached Areas
single family detached housing includes a range of housing types
from custom or semi-custom golf course frontage homes on 7,000
square foot lots to "wide and shallow" lots for cottage homes in
off golf course locations.
Tract subdivision construction in single family detached areas
should be based upon the following criteria:
1. A minimum of three housing plans should be provided, each
with a minimum of three facade treatments, which vary entry,
window type and treatment of exterior materials and colors.
(8-16-94)
VI- tt
/ / >/
, ,
2. Generally, at least one housing plan should be two-story
and one plan one-story or two-story with one-story elements and
character.
3. Roof style, material and height should be varied.
Single family detached
encourage variety in the
homes, whenever practical.
residential lots and setbacks should
design, orientation and placement of
4. Front yard building setbacks should be varied to avoid a
monotonous pattern of houses.
5. Front yard building setbacks should be varied to create
greater solar access, provide more useful private open space
in side yards, and avoid monotonous pattern of homes.
6. The appropriateness of lots backing to other than major
arterial will be reviewed with individual tract maps or site
plans. When deemed appropriate, lots backing up to collector
streets should be set back from the street right-of-way to permit
adequate landscaped buffers along the street frontages.
6.7.1 Additional Guidelines for single Family Detached lots under
5,000 square feet:
6.7.1: Fee Simple single Family Lots under 5,000 square feet shall
be subject to the City of Chula vista Design Manual for Small Lot
single Family Detached Housing.
6.7.2: single Family Detached Homes in condominium/cluster
developments shall be reviewed on a case by case basis to determine
the applicability of Design Manual guidelines intended for Single
Family Homes on small individual lots.
(8-16-94)
V:l:=::I:Z
,
.t
/ //:-1/;
.- f
;"--
~ j j J
i
i !,
! I ii
I ;.ll
0 II)
. 0 I,
en 00 If]
...'"
EJ !I
'~In~
t'i~ j
\J~j
ex)
~
-
:c
:E
x
w
~
, )
i :::
,)
------7
~::-- /-
A/ I..
//
"//".->
/' /
/1//
,//
//
/,/
.' /
, .
'/
/--
UJ~U
~LLI U~
SUJ ~~
~~<
Ul(.!)
;)5
~
2. Generally, at least one housing plan should be
two-story and one plan one-story.
3. Roof style, material and height should be'varied.
Single--family detached residential lots and setbacks should
encourage variety in the design, orientation and placement of
homes, wherever practical.
4. Front yard building setbacks should be varied to avoid
a monotonous patterp of houses.
5. Side yard setbacks should be varied to create greater
solar access, provide more useful private open space in
side yards, and avoid monotonous pattern of houses.
6. The appropriateness of lots backing to other than major
arterials will be reviewed with individual tract maps
or site plans. When deemed appropriate, lots backing
up to collector streets should be set back from the
street right-of-way to permit adequate landscaped buf-
fers along the street frontage.
6.8 Design and Orientation - Single Family Attached and
Multiple Family
Various types of multiple family units and sing,le-family
attached areas are planned for Ea s tLake Greens to' provide a
greater variety in design and life-style preference.
The following unit types are anticipated within EastLake Greens:
Zero-Lot Line Homes: One or two story detached or
attached homes where either a single structure is built
on a single side lot line or two structures share a
single wall astride a side lot line, thus increasing
the usable side yard area.
Patio Homes: Attached and detached homes clustered in
a courtyard fashion, often in zero-lot line ownership
and individually oriented toward an outdoor patio area.
Town Houses: One and two story attached units in build-
ings with 4 to 8 or more units that are the traditional
"Southern California Condominium", These may have
individual fee ownership lots or condominium ownership.
Flats: The traditional apartment-type building where
an individual unit is typically situated on a single
level and may have others above or below.
Building orientation in multiple family housing should consider
indoor end outdoor ?rivacy, solar access and overall aesthetic
a;Jpearance.
(3/1/39)
VI=~'
/..c~ ,/j -::/
...."'...n...
~~~;~:
1. Buildings should be oriented in such a way as to create
courtyards and open space areas, thus increasing the
aesthetic appeal of the area.
2. Building design should incorporate variety in the type
of materials, colors, units, heights and facades.
3. Textured materials such as stucco, rough sawn wood and
split faced block are encouraged.
4. Buildings with roof overhangs are encouraged to give a
traditional residential appearance.
5. Bui lding facades should include relief to avoid a
monotonous line.
6.
Uncovered stairwells should be precluded from general
streetscape view through the use of wing walls, land-
scaping or other means.
7.
Private spaces such as patios or balconies are encourag-
ed for each unit.
8.
Solid walls or fences, not less than 5 feet in height,
should be provided along property lines adj oining
access or parking areas, except where adjacent to
another multiple family housing area.
6.9
Site Planning and Design Guidelines
A comprehensive set of design guidelines and site planning
cri teria have been prepared. They are provided in a separate
text enti tIed "EastLake Greens SPA - Design Guidelines" and
should be consul ted during the review of individual projects
within the EastLake Greens neighborhood. Project standards for
minimum lot size, setbacks, street frontage, etc. are
established in the PC District Regulations.
6.10
Precise Plan Guidelines - Village Center Areas
A precise plan should be prepared for each Village Center area
prior to any building construction. The plan for the area at
Telegraph Canyon Road and EastLake Parkway should directly
relate to the Village Center included in the EastLake I SPA.
1 . Vi llage Cen ter ( s) should have an integra ted des ign
theme for the establishment of the community's primary
commercial activity area.
2. Individual site planning should consider the planning
of adj oining parcels to ensure visual and functional
compatibility.
( 3/1 /89 ) ~,
') '1) ~:;
6.11
2.
6.12
3.
Site planning submittals for development review should
include the location of landscaping, parking areas
access, signage and structures on adjoining parcels. '
4.
The site plan should i.llustrate compatibility with the
planning of adjoining parcels in the areas of building
configuration, building design, landscaping material,
parking configuration and access.
5.
The site planning of signs should consider visibility,
location and integration with the overall design theme
of the Village Center.
6.
The proportion, size and shapes of commercial struc-
tures should be compatible with adjacent buildings.
7.
The use of projection and architectural details should
enhance the facade of commercial structures by provid-
ing relief and variety.
8.
Roofs and roof lines should complement the building pro-
portion and also be compatible with adjacent struc-
tures.
Lighting
1 .
Street Lighting:
City standards
Engineer.
All street lighting shall conform to
and shall be approved by the City
Theme and Commercial Lighting: Lighting for business
enterprises; recreation facilities, signs, .walkways
shall be reviewed and approved by the City on a case-
by-case basis as an element of Si te Plan Review. The
Site Plan shall include the design and type of lighting
proposed and the time of use. Any lighting for recrea-
tion facili ties, signs or business enterprises which
will illuminate a residential area past the hour of
10:00 p.m., shall be clearly identified on said site
plan for specific consideration. Any such lighting
which illuminates a residential area that has not been
approved by the City on a Site Plan or other permit
shall not be permitted.
Scenic Highways
The City of Chula Vista General Plan designates Telegraph Canyon
Road and Orange Avenue as scenic highways. Telegraph Canyon
Road extends approximately 4.5 miles from Interstate 805 east to
Eas tLake Greens. Orange Avenue has not been extended to the
vicinity of EastLake Greens.
(3/1/89)
V~I5
.:;- -._/' V /,
!/ "-
6.12.1 Scenic Corridor Guidelines
Telegraph Canyon Road, Orange Avenue, Hunte Parkway and future
state Route 125 should be treated as scenic highways.
Where feasible, the city should maintain a landscaped corridor
adjacent to the ultimate right-of-way line along all scenic
highways associated with EastLake Greens. The corridor should be
landscaped and maintained to enhance the scenic roadway area and
placed within an open space easement or made part of the road right
-of-way, consistent with the provisions of the Scenic Highways
section of the General Plan Land Use Element Update. Such a
corridor is depicted conceptually on the site Utilization Plan,
Exhibit 3.
Any new residential development backing upon a scenic roadway shall
have decorative solid walls and/or landscaped earthen berms, or
otherwise landscaped to implement the scenic highways policies of
the General Plan. The silhouette of structures as viewed from the
scenic roads is important. To avoid a walled-in effect, the use of
single-story structures is encouraged. Where two-story structures
are within 100 feet of the curb, additional tree planting or second
story elevation enhancement should be provided.
There shall be a landscape buffer along the full length of Orange
Avenue within EastLake Greens. This landscape buffer shall average
75 I from the back of curb. Residential structures, including
fences, shall not be permitted within this buffer. A landscape
design for this scenic highway buffer sha~.~....e;y~~e~~!:!::ei~8;-
approval by the City' s LaIldseape Al: chi teet J?~rltsd}i@ana':)~i~~QJ;iSl;t;~on
~~pl~;J;I~n~1~;I';;;:;fJln:~~2Ipl;;;;~g!i~t=19J; pr i or to, or ....concurrent 1 y with,
the first site Plan approval adjacent to Orange Avenue ( Parcels R-
IO & R-12).
A scenic corridor is also depicted internal to the project at the
western end of parcel R-28 to maintain entry views to the club
house. Improvements, such as a recreation area, which maintain
visual access are permitted in this area, along with appropriate
landscaping.
(8 16 94)
VI~6
v/~
Appendix "A" to the EastLake Greens SPA Plan
Affordable Housing Program
for the Planned Community of EastLake
Approved by the Chula Vista City Council
Resolution No. 17982 on July 25, 1995
//:; / V".!:
RESOLUTION NO, 17982
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ADOPTING A PROGRAM FOR THE PROVISION OF
AFFORDABLE HOUSING WITHIN THE EASTLAKE PLANNED
COMMUNITY; AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 15200 AND
APPROVING AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site.
WHEREAS. the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference. which is composed of what is commonly referred to
as the planned community of EastLake Phases II. III and the Land Swap Parcels
("Project Site"); and,
B. Project.
WHEREAS. the EastLake Affordable Housing Task Force has recommended that
the City Council consider the adoption of the Affordable Housing Program for
the Project Site (known as Document No. C095-119 on file in the Office of the
City Clerk); and,
C. Developer.
WHEREAS. a person having control over all or a portion of the development of
the Project Site is identified as EastLake Development Company ("Developer");
and,
D,
Prior City Council Action,
;
WHEREAS, On July 18. 1989. the City approved a Master Tentative Map. for
approximately 830 acres located within the- Eastlake Planned Community. by
Resolution Number 15200 ("Eastlake Greens Original Tentative Map").
Condition Number 44 of Resolution 1 5200 required that a low and moderate
income housing program be established with a goal of providing 5% low and
5% moderate income housing units within the Eastlake Greens Tentative Map
area ("Affordable Housing Requirement"). (A 1 % deviation resulting in 4% low
and 6% moderate income housing was originally considered acceptable.) The
City deferred the Affordable Housing ReQuirement pending further evaluation
of the General Plan density policies as related to parcels R-24. R-25, R-26, R-27
and R-28; and.
WHEREAS, the City Council. as a Condition of Resolution NO.1 7309 adopted
December 12, 1993. for General Plan Amendment GPA-93-04 ("GPA-93-04"),
/ > l~
Resolution No. 17982
Page 3
III. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED
Mitigated Negative Declaration.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered the
previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-95-21 (known as Document
No. C095-120 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and comments thereon, the
environmental impacts therein identified for this project prior to approving the Project.
Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the Council finds that there is no
substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment
and thereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-95-21 .
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEOA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-95-21
has been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental
Ouality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the
City of Chula Vista.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-95-21 reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council.
VI. ADOPTION OF PROGRAM
The City Council does hereby approve and adopt the Project on the terms and
conditions herein specified.
VII. AMENDMENT TO EASTLAKE GREENS TENTATIVE MAP
,
The City Council does hereby amend Condition No. 44 of Resolution No. 15200,
adopted July 18. 1989. for the EastLake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, to read
as follows:
f
As soon as possible after the adoption of Resolution No. 17982, but in no event later
than the recordation of the Final Map containing the 1 500th unit of this Tentative Map,
the City and the Developer shall have entered into a binding and recordable agreement
(" Affordable Housing Agreement") providing that among other things (1) after the
building permit for the development of the 2,550th unit within the territory of this
Tentative Map, as amended by Resolution 17618, has been issued, the City shall have
the absolute and unfettered right to withhold the issuance of any building permits for
any construction within the territory of this Tentative Map until the Developer has
under significant construction 160 qualified low income housing units that meet with
the approval of the City; and (2) the Developer shall, without regard to the further and
additional development of the territory of this Tentative Map, have under significant
construction. no later than June 1. 1998. 112 qualified low income housing units that
meet with the approval of the City. Said affordable Housing Agreement shall be
executed by Eastlake Development Company, and an abstract of the same satisfactory
~ '
Resolution No. 17982
Page 5
XI. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
XII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are
determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable,
this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and
effect ab initio.
Presented by
JVJ Ii .LL
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
;
//. .,./
Resolution No.1 7982
Page 7
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
California, this 25th day of July, 1995, by the following vote:
AYES:
Councilmembers:
Alevy, Moot, Padilla, Rindone, Horton
NAYES:
Councilmembers:
None
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
None
ABST AIN:
Councilmembers:
None
~~-YIr11L...,
Shirl Horton, Mayor
ATTEST:
,:~/. / I~. I~\ , "'.
. I i - - / I ..
~ ~Ij.. L....' >{ (/ J.. tL tl',~i:.-' 1-
Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No.1 7982 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City
Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 25th day of July,
1995. .
Executed this 25th day of July, 1995.
;
~~ Aee,ee~~
/r
.,~/
CITY CLERK
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Recording Requested by:
When Recorded, Mail to:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
------------------------------------------------------------------
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
This Eastlak~Aff9rdable Housing Agreement ("Agreement") is
made as of 7. ~S , 1995, by and between the Eastlake
Development Comparl'y, a California general partnership ("Developer")
and the City of Chula vista, a California municipal corporation
("City"), with reference to the following facts:
A. Developer owns approximately 830 acres of that certain real
property, described on Exhibit "A", and located in the Eastern
portion of the City of Chula Vista (referred to herein as "Eastlake
Greens") . Eastlake Greens is more particularly described in
Exhibi t "A" which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by
this reference.
B. On July 18, 1989, the City approved a Master Tentative Map
for Eastlake Greens by Resolution Number 15200 ("Eastlake Tentative
Map"). Condition number 44 of the Eastlake Tentative Map required
that a low and moderate income housing program be established with
a goal of providing 5% low and 5% moderate income housing units
("Affordable Housing Program") within the Eastlake Tentative Map
area. (A 1% deviation resulting in the construction of 4% low and
,6% moderate income housing units was originally deemed acceptable.)
The City deferred the Affordable Housing Program pending further
evaluation of the City's General plan density policies.
C. On December 12, 1993, the City adopted a General Plan
Amendment (GPA-93-04) by Resolution Number 17309, which reinstated
the Affordable Housing Program previously established by Condition
Number 44 of the Eastlake Tentative Map.
D. The parties now desire to provide a means to implement the
low income housing requirement of Condition No. 44 of the Eastlake
Tentative Map.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Definition. Unless otherwise indicated, for purposes of
this Agreement, the term "low income housing" shall mean housing
1
.,
CO ?yJ~1
{' ) 77 8"~
units which are offered to qualified families whose income levels
range from 50-80 % of the regional median income.
2. Duty to Build. Developer shall have under significant
construction, no later than June 1, 1998, 112 qualified low income
housing units at the location and in a configuration and design
approved by the city. Developer shall thereafter diligently pursue
completion of the construction of such units. Developer shall
construct such units regardless of any further or additional
development taking place within Eastlake Greens from the date of
this Agreement.
3. Conditional Duty to Build. Notwithstanding the provisions
of paragraph 2 of this Agreement, should a building permit for the
2,550th unit be applied for within Eastlake Greens, Developer shall
be responsible for constructing 160 qualified low income housing
units at the location and in a configuration and design approved by
the city. Developer shall immediately commence construction of the
160 low income housing units and shall thereafter diligently pursue
completion of the construction of such units. The duty contained
in this paragraph is non-cumulative to the duty in paragraph 2 (to
build 112 low income units) such that Developer's total duty if
2,550 (and up to 3,192) residential units are developed within
Eastlake Greens, will be to build 160 qualified low income housing
units. Any of the 112 low income units constructed in accordance
with Paragraph 2 above, will be credited against the duty to build
the 160 units contained herein.
4. Right to withhold Permits. After the building permit for
the development of the 2,550th residential unit within Eastlake
Greens has been issued, the City sha 11 have the absolute and
unfettered right to withhold the issuance of any building permit
for any further construction within Eastlake Greens until Developer
has under significant construction 160 qualified low income housing
units that meet with the approval of the city.
s. Development Permits, Maps and Documents. Developer shall
at its sole expense, prepare and diligently process all permits,
agreements, plans, maps and other documents, including but not
limited to, amendments to the General Development Plan and
sectional Planning Area Plan for Eastlake Greens that are necessary
to construct the low income housing units in the time frames set
forth herein. Developer shall submit an affordability plan to the
City for its approval prior to the first building permit
application being submitted to the City for construction of the
first low income housing unit. The affordabili ty plan shall
describe, among other items, the eligibility qualification process
to be used for the sale or rental of the low income housing units,
the administrative plan for management of such units and the
funding program used to finance the construction of the same.
"'2
. -. ///;/
6. General Provisions.
a. Authoritv of Siqnatories. Each individual signing
this Agreement on behalf of the City warrants that (i) he or she is
duly authorized to sign and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the
Ci ty in accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the City
Council of the City and (ii) this Agreement is binding upon the
City in accordance with its terms. Each individual signing this
Agreement on behalf of a corporation warrants that (i) he or she is
duly authorized to sign and deliver this Agreement on behalf of the
corporation, in accordance with a duly adopted resolution of the
board of directors of the corporation or in accordance with the
bylaws of the corporation, and (ii) this Agreement is binding upon
the corporation in accordance with its terms.
b. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any
number of counterparts, each of which will be deemed to be an
original, but all of which together will constitute one instrument.
c. Applicable Law. This Agreement will be construed and
enforced in accordance with the laws of the state of California.
d. Successors. All terms of this Agreement will be
binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their
respective administrators or executors, successors and assigns.
e. Modifications. No modification, waiver or discharge
of this Agreement will be valid unless the same is in writing and
signed by the parties of this Agreement.
f. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties relating to the transaction
contemplated hereby and all prior or contemporaneous agreements,
understandings, representations and statements, oral or written are
merged herein.
g. Attorney's fees and costs. If either party commences
litigation for the judicial interpretation, reformation enforcement
or rescission hereof, the prevailing party will be entitled to a
judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable
attorney's fees and court and other costs incurred. The
"prevailing party" shall be deemed to be the party who is awarded
substantially the relief sought.
h. Exhibits, All exhibits referred to in this Agreement
are attached, and are a part of, this Agreement.
i. Captions. Captions in this Agreement are inserted
for convenience of reference only and do not define, describe or
limit the scope or the intent of this Agreement.
T
j. Recordinq. The parties hereto shall cause this
Agreement to be recorded in the Official Records of the County of
San Diego.
4--
f; , /(
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AFFORDABLE HOUSING AGREEMENT
IN WITNESS WJjE.BE.Of I City
Agreement this ~I~ day of
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
shdC~
Mayor
Attest:
/l
St.! C()Q ,
0{:u { : / - 0tf2:i
Beverly, Authelet
. I
Cl.ty Clerk
ruce M. Boogaar:
City Attorney
M:\Hoae\Attorney\Affordab.1
and Developer have executed this
'Jl.tJ" V I 1995.
/
GRANTOR
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY,
a California general partnership
By:
r-
By:
Name:
Title.
By: THE TULAGO COMPANY, a
California corporation,
::~~
Name: ?~.... ~,~
Title: 0
By:
Name:
Title:
-s
./ ~.-?
DRA.FT
PROGRAM FOR THE PROVISION OF
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
WITHIN THE EASTLAKE PLANNED COMMUNITY
Prepared Bv:
Eastlake Affordable Housing Task Force
John Moot (Planning Commission), Chairman
James Kell (Eastlake II), Vice Chairman
Gary Bloch (Eastkake I)
J.R de Jesus Chantengco (Lending/Finance)
Dan Marcus (Non-Profit Housing)
Bill Ostrem (Eastlake Development)
Bob Snyder (Eastlake Development)
City Staff
Dave Gustafson, Assistant Director of Community Development
Juan Arroyo, Housing Coordinator
Duane E. Bazzel, Principal Planner
Edgar Batchelder, Senior Planner
Prepared For:
The Chula Vista City Council
December 21, 1994
/
"/'
..{
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE NO.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................. iii
I. INTRODUCTION I BACKGROUND ................................. 1
A. Purpose of the Task Force and .Program ........................ 1
B. Public Involvement ........................................ 2
C. The Chula Vista Housing Element and
Affordable Housing Program ................................. 2
II. EASTLAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS ................. 3
A. Eastlake I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
B. Eastlake II '..,.......................................... 3
C. Eastlake III ,...............,............................. 4
D Eastlake Land Swap . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
E. Olympic Training Center ............,....................... 4
III. EASTLAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM I STRATEGIES. . . . . . . . .. 6
A. Definitions of Affordable Housing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
B. Proposed Eastlake Affordable Housing Program I Strategy. . . . . . . . . .. 9
1. Site Selection Criteria . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 9
2. Phase I - Immediate Efforts ........................... 11
a Phase I f.rea Defined . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
b. Proposed Affordable Housing Site Locations
and Attributes ................................ 11
c. Implementation of Phase I ....... ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
3. Phase II . Future Efforts ... . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16
a. Phase II Area Defined .......................... 16
b. Proposed Affordable Housing Site Locations
and Attributes ................................ 16
c. Implementation of Phase II . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16
IV. SUMMARY OF NECESSARY IMP1.EMENTING ACTIONS ............... 19
A. Phase I Implementation Tasks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . .. 29
B. Phase II Implementation Tlsks .............................. 20
APPENDICES
-i~.
-/ -"/-7
LIST OF FIGURES
FIGURE PAGE NO.
Figure A - Eastlake Neighborhoods and Surrounding Communities ....... 5
Figure B - Maximum Annual Household Income ..................... 7
Figure C - Affordable Rents and Sales Prices by Income Level
and Unit Size ....................................... 8
Figure D - Market-rate Housing in Eastlake Greens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Figure E - Potential Affordable Housing Sites ....................... 15
-ti.;
-;/ /~' ' ,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In December, 1993, the Chy Council directed that a Task Force be formed for the
purpose of recommending a comprehensive affordable housing program for the
Eastlake Planned Community. This paper represents the Task Force recommendation
for a two-phased implementation program, both short-term and long-term, that will
achieve the goals and objectives of the City of Chula Vista Housing Element, that
complies with related approvals for the Eastlake project, addresses Eastlake residents'
concerns and input, and acknowledges contemporary economic constraints and
opportunities.
Affordable housing under the City's Affordable Housing Program is briefly defined as
for-sale or rental housing units which are offered to qualified families whose income
levels range from 50-80% of the regional median income (low-income), to 80-120% of
the regional median income (moderate-income). The median income level in San
Diego County for a family of four is currently $45,400. Financing or other creative
techniques are used to make up the difference between market-rate sales/rental prices
and those which families within these income levels can qualify for.
Through research and discussion, the Task Force recognized that the quality of
affordable housing projects today, in most cases, is the same as that provided through
"market-rate" residential projects. These projects cannot be discerned as different from
other quality development projects. To inform the community of their findings, the Task
Force published articles in the Eastlake community newsletters and conducted a public
forum at Eastlake High School.
The Chula Vista Housing Element and City Council approvals for Eastlake require that
a minimum of 10% of the approved units be provided as affordable housing and that
one-half of those units qualify for low-income families. Based on a total of 6,958
residential housing units approved for development within Eastlake Greens, Trails,
Woods, Vistas and remaining undeveloped portions of Eastlake, a total of 696 low and
moderate-income housing units will be provided. Within the Greens (Phase I
Implementation), a total of 320 units, and in remaining areas (Phase II Implementation),
a total of 376 units. This affordable housing program identifies a total of 9 proposed
affordable housing sites, all of which will require additional evaluation and approvals
prior to final site selections.
Phase I of this program, representing short-term implementation tasks, consists of the
provision of 160 low-income housing units on a 24-aere parcel of land located directly
south of Eastlake High School. It is estimated that approvals could be obtained and
construction begin within 24 months of adoption of this program. The Task Force
determined that all of the required moderate-income housing units can and are being
provided throughout Eastlake Greens. Alternative low-income housing sites have been
-iii-
"'i
-.,/
identified within or adjacent to the Greens if all 160 low-income units, required within
the Greens, cannot be achieved on the 24-acre site,
Phase II consists of a long-term implementation plan for providing affordable housing
units within all remaining undeveloped areas within Eastlake. The provision of
affordable housing will be addressed progressively at each future level of planning
evaluation and approvals (e.g., General Development Plans, Sectional Planning Area
Plans and Tentative and Final Subdivision Maps). Affordable housing will be addressed
at each level of project approval and timetables will be set for performance on various
tasks including affordable housing agreements and building permit phasing schedules.
Using this program as a guide for the provision of affordable housing within future
development areas of Eastlake. it is expected that development of future affordable
housing units will be commensurate with geographical development phasing.
At the end of this report a section has been included that summarizes the
implementation tasks necessary to be performed at each phase of the development
process. This information serves as a summary of the Phase I and Phase II
implementation tasks and will function as a quick reference, outlining the actions that
have to take place in order to implement the program.
.~
,'i
,.J
I. INTRODUCTION I BACKGROUND
A. Purpose of Task Force and Program
In December, 1993, the City Council directed that a Task Force be formed
of residents from the EastLake community, professional representatives
familiar with affordable housing provisions, a member of the Planning
Commission and representatives from the EastLake Development
Company, for the purpose of recommending a comprehensive affordable
housing program for the EastLake Planned Community that: (1)
addresses needs identified in the City's Housing Element, (2) complies
with related provisions of current government approvals for the EastLake
project, (3) addresses EastLake residents' concerns and input, and (4)
acknowledges contemporary economic constraints and opportunities
inherent to implementing alternative affordable housing solutions.
This paper represents the Task Force's recommendation to the City
Council for an affordable housing program for EastLake. The structure of
the program implementation consists of a phased approach, with the first
phase to be implemented in the short-term, and the second phase to be
refined and implemented commensurate with the geographic development
plans over time.
The Task Force recognized that there is a strong need to inform the
community of what constitutes the makeup of wage earners that actually
fall into the various income groups targeted for affordable housing. In
other words, the typical wage earners and the occupations associated
with affordability levels often represent people that we all work or deal
with every day, Another recognition of the Task Force was that the
quality of affordable housing projects, in most cases, cannot be discerned
from other quality development projects.
The Eastlake Affordable Housing Task Force has researched successful
affordable housing programs locally and in other areas of the state and
have found many common myths to be false. What is true are the
following factors:
1. Affordable homes today are designed and built to look like
surrounding neighborhoods.
2. People who rent or buy affordable housing are as stable and
community-spirited as those who live in higher-priced homes. They
belong to the PT A, the Neighborhood Watch, and sell Girl Scout
cookies.
...~.
1-
3. Many if not most people who buy or rent affordable housing
already live in the community or are people you know at work.
4. The presence of affordable homes in a community does not affect
the property values of surrounding higher-priced homes.
C. Public Involvement
In order to create and keep open a channel of communication, particularly
with Eastlake residents, the Task Force:
1, Published a brief article in the August 1994 "Currents" and
"GreensView" newsletters announcing the Task Force's existence
and purpose, and phone numbers for Eastlake representatives as
well as City staff.
2. Published a second article in the September 1994 "Currents" and
"GreensView", profiling information about who affordable housing
is for and the importance of providing it. The article also
announced the location and date for an upcoming public forum on
affordable housing
3. Held a public forum at Eastlake High School on September 29,
1994, to present the Task Force's findings and proposed program
for providing required affordable housing within the Eastlake
planned community, and to receive community input and reaction
to the proposed program. The forum, which involved a
presentation by the Task Force, a non-profit affordable housing
provider (Bridge), and City staff, was attended by 10 to 15
EastLake residents. Appendix A, attached hereto. contains
questions that were asked at the forum and responses to those
questions,
D. The Chula Vista Housing Element and Affordable Housing Program
The City of Chula Vista, along with all other cities in California, is required
by State Law to have a Housing Element as a component of its General
Plan. It describes the housing needs of the community, and the
responses necessary to fulfill them. State law require.s that Housing
Elements be updated every five years.
The Housing Element of 1991 contains numerous objectives and related
action programs. Key among these is the Affordable Housing Program
(AHP) which was conceived as a response to the onset of large-scale
-2--
./, /).//
.., . /
master planned communities. The AHP applies to projects involving 50
or more housing units and requires the reservation of 10% of the
development's housing units for low and moderate-income households,
with at least one-half of those (or 5% of the total units) for low-income
households. .
II. EASTLAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
A. Eastlake I - Hills, Shores, Village Center, Business Center Phase I.
The Eastlake I development, which includes the Hills and Shores
residential neighborhoods, was approved in 1985, and includes a total of
1,834 units, of which 101 low-income housing units were provided. These
residential neighborhoods have been completed with a resultant total of
9 low-income units constructed in excess of the minimum requirement.
This Program will address the following partially or undeveloped portions
of Eastlake.
B. Eastlake II - Greens, Trails.
The Eastlake II development was approved in November, 1989, and
authorized a total of 4,034 housing units involving both the Greens and
Trails neighborhoods. The Greens included 2,774 housing units and the
Trails 1,260 units.
In December, 1993, the City Council considered and approved an
amendment to the General Plan for 44 acres within the Greens which
resulted in the potential increase of 418 units to the Greens. Subsequent
approvals by the City will be required to establish the exact number of
units, however, this could bring the total number of units within the Greens
and Trails to 4,452, At present, only about 32% of the approved units
(1,032 units) within the Greens have been completed or have started
construction and .no units have final authorization for construction within
the Trails.
The total number of low-income housing units required to be constructed
within the Greens is 160\ with a commensurate total of 160 moderate-
income housing units (5% /5%). Affordable housing requirements for the
Trails amounts to a total of 63 low-income and 63 moderate-income units
(5% / 5%).
I The City Council authorized the total low-income housing units for the Greens to be reduced 10 4% of Ihe project requirement
(128 units). wlIh 6o/c Cor moderate-income units (192 units). iC it is found thai a lotal oC 3% low-income units are not found 10 be feasible.
See footnote ~2 for addilJonaJ provisions applied to the Trails
~
/
/.
~/
~
C. Eastlake III - Woods, Vistas, Business Center Phase II, Olympic
Training Center.
The Woods and Vistas have General Development Plan-level approvals
for a total of 1,767 housing units, which would amount to 88 low and 88
moderate-income units (5% I 5%).2 Subsequent levels of City Council
approval will still be required prior to authorization to construct units within
the Woods and Vistas.
D. Eastlake Land SwaD
In 1990, Eastlake Development Company and the Baldwin Company
executed an exchange of adjacent land holdings to create more logical
geographic planning boundaries between the Eastlake and Otay Ranch
development projects; hence the reference "Land Swap". The Land Swap
area contains 161 acres and is authorized at the General Plan-level only
which would authorize approximately 739 units at mid-range densities.
Subsequent planning approvals are expected within the next several
years, however, development timing for the area would likely be
coordinated with that of the adjacent Otay Ranch.
The total number of low-income housing units estimated for the Land
Swap properties is 37, with a commensurate total of 37 moderate-income
housing units (5% I 5%),
E. OlvmDic Trainina Center (OTC)
The Olympic Training Center facility, located on 160-acres adjacent to
Lower Otay Reservoir will contain a variety of open sports fields, ancillary
conference and training buildings, and 300-400 dormitory units for
athletes. Construction of the OTC, which commenced in 1992, is
expected to be phased over the next few years. Subsequent to approval
of the OTC, the City Council authorized an amendment to the General
Plan for the adjacent Vistas neighborhood in Eastlake III, to provide
support commercial and residential land uses next to the OTC.
The Eastlake Development Company has expressed interest in receiving
affordable housing credits for the installation of athlete's dormitory units
within the OTC. The Task Force has examined the potential and
2 ^ Development Agreement between the City of Chula Vista aDd tbe Eastlake DevelopmCDt Company cowriDS the Eastlake III
development area (also including the Eastlake Trails neighborhood), was approved in 1990. This asreement stales thaI the City
acknowledges that low and moderate income housing may be economically impractical 10 build al curreDt density levels, and lhatlhe City
agrees thaI it will consider granting Developer density bonuses andlor other incentives.
;;4-
/'. ~ ,...-,
-:........ ,:.:
appropriateness of this approach. and while there was no consensus
reached on this issue, the Task Force requested that further consideration
be given to affordable housing credits for the OTe dormitories.
FIGURE A
EASTLAKE NEIGHBORHOODS AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES
r.:J ~-~-
Sart Creek
Ranch
EAST\.AKE
aUSINESS
CENTER
Otey Rench
Village 5
~::~::::~
'>:;:;;
.,-.r IAlTWClIOl NWW
'.. ---wi
'/ /
,..7
/
/
~
.....
III. EASTLAKE AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM I STRATEGIES
A. Definitions of Affordable Housing
In September, 1993, SANDAG prepared common definitions to be used
by all the jurisdictions to account for new affordable housing units,
especially those added by the private sector. The resulting annual income
figures according to income group and family size, and affordable rent and
sales prices by unit size are presented in Figures Band C respectively.
What the exhibits show are the various income qualification levels for not
only low-income (80% of median income) and moderate-income (120%
of median income). but also very low-income (50% of median income).
The median income today in San Diego, for a family of four, is $45,400
per year.
The provision of an adequate amount of affordable housing is a problem
throughout Southern California, including Chula Vista. Over the past two
decades, housing prices have soared ahead of family incomes. Today,
the average price of a two-bedroom home in Chula Vista is $157,900.
Additionally, workers' salaries have increased modestly or remained
stagnant in recent years. Today's median income of $45,400 a year for
a family of four in the San Diego region is barely enough to afford the
basic three-bedroom house. Home ownership for many people has been
out of the question.
The affordable housing shortage is no means confined to for-sale housing.
Being able to afford the average monthly rent for apartments in Chula
Vista is a major problem for those working people whose incomes are
below 50 percent of the median ($22,700). Appendix 0 identifies
employment profiles, based on a family of four, by income group. This
exhibit effectively demonstrates the types of occupations that typically fall
within the targeted affordable housing income levels. As an example, an
Accountant II earns approximately $36,300 a year. If this individual were
supporting a family of four, this would qualify the family within the low-
income range.
The most significant factor in providing for.sale and rental of market-rate
homes to buyers that cannot qualify due to their income level, is providing
a means to eliminate the difference between affordability levels and actual
loan or rental costs. This difference, known 8S the "8ffordability gap",
must be eliminated in order to make market.rate homes available for
lower-income families. There are a variety of ways to reduce or remove
this gap, many of which take the form of subsidies which are provided
..:s;
y
through many, ~ifferent sources. An example of what these programs
consist of is listed in Appendix B to this report.
FIGURE B
MAXIMUM ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME
BY FAMILY SIZE AND INCOME GROUP ·
ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME LEVELS . t:Y 1994.95 -
Family Size Very Low low Median Mode rille Above Mod.
(50%) (80%) (100%) (120%) (121%+)
1 15.900 25,400 31,800 38,150 38,151+
2 18,150 29.050 36,300 43,600 43,601+
3 20,450 32.700 40,850 49,050 49,051+
4 22,700 36,300 45.400 54,500 54,501+
5 24.500 39,200 49.050 58,850 58,851+
6 26,350 42,150 52,650 63,200 63,201+
7 28,150 45,050 56,300 67,600 67,601+
8 29 950 47,950 59.950 71 ,950 71,951+
.
Table data derived from HUD Fiscal Year 1994-95 Income Limits for San Diego County as
published May 31. 1994, and obtained from the State Department of Housing And Community
Development
..
Percentages shown are of median income: resulting figures reflect the maximum allowable
income for the respective income category
.;:r..-::
-I r
-J
flGURE C
AFFORDABLE RENTS AND SALES PRICES BY
INCOME LEVEL AND UNIT SIZE *
FY 94-95 FY 94-95 FY 94-95
No. of Affordable Housing Affordable
Level of Income Bedrooms Rents Exoense - Sales
Very Very Low Studio $171 $204
1 239 272 $32.670
2 298 341 40.860
3 339 395 47,385
4 382 450 53,955
5 432 504 60,480
Very Low Studio $307 $340
1 421 454 $54,450
2 525 568 68,100
3 602 658 78,975
4 677 749 89,925
5 768 840 100,800
Low Studio $512 $545
1 693 726 $87,120
2 865 908 108,960
3 997 1,053 126,360
4 1,127 1,199 143,880
5 1,272 1,344 161,280
Moderate Studio $784 $817
1 1,056 1,089 $130.680
2 1,319 1,362 163,440
3 1,524 1,580 189.540
4 1,727 1,799 215,820
5 1.944 2,016 241,920
* Figures in this table apply a persons-per.bedroom rate in determining the family
size whose annual income is then used to derive the affordable rates shown.
- Applies to rental housing, and reflects a monthly utility allowance.
-s:.
./'
/1 ./
'"
B. Proposed Eastlake Affordable Housing Program I Strategy
As a result of the phased implementation of the Greens project and future
development scenarios for the remaining EastLake holdings,. it appears
that a phased affordable housing program would best meet short-term
performance requirements, and allow enough flexibility to respond to
economic conditions through the remainder of the project. Figure E
identifies potential low-income housing sites that, however, have not
received development entitlements.
Targeted moderate-income units (80-120% of median income) within
Eastlake have been found to be adequately provided through market-rate
housing units that are proposed in subsequent phases or have already
been provided. This is demonstrated in Figure D. The Task Force
decided that since the moderate-income housing units will be provided
and dispersed throughout the development, that the primary focus of the
Program should be targeting low-income units (50-80% of median
income).
1. Site Selection Criteria
Each of the potential sites identified on Figure E must be analyzed
through subsequent levels of planning analysis and review and
ideally be selected based on the following selection criteria, With
the exception of the following Phase I requirements, this Program
is in no way meant to prejudice future siting considerations for
affordable housing. The City Council shall have full and
independent authority to decide on the appropriateness of each of
the potential sites. or others that may be identified in the future. In
determining the appropriate locations for affordable housing sites,
the following selection criteria should be used:
a. Units should be located near public transit facilities, including
bus routes.
b. Units should be located within walking distance (ideally 1/4
mile) of retail commercial services and support services.
c. Units should be located near public park facilities, however,
most of the projects will be provided internal open space.
d. Every effort should be made to make targeted sites
compatible with adjacent residential (Le., densities, design,
etc.).
.-g;...
/.. .-'
/'j
FIGURE D
MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING
IN EASTLAKE GREENS
Units Below Units from Units from
Project Bed/Bath $163,440 5163,440 to 5189,540 $189,540 to 5215,820
RGC 2/2 33
(Lot R-22) 3/2 68 37
CYPRESS 3/2 51
(Lot R-14) 4/2 35
CLASSICS 2/2 35
(Lot R-24 3/2 42
& 25)
4/2 47
MASTERSI 2/2 13
BRISTOLWOOD 3/2
(Lot R-17) 93
4/2 36
VILLAS 2/2 33
(Lot R-19) 3/2 81
(Lot R-20) 3/2 55
4/2 54
TOTAL 182 441 12
Note The total moderate-income housing requirement for Eastlake Greens and remaining undeveloped
areas is 348 units, or 5% of the total number of authorized units. Based on the above table. at
least 715 moderate-income units are expected to be provided within Eastlake.
-~
-,",
!
7
...."
2 Phase I - Immediste Efforts
a. Phase I Area Defined.
The Phase I area of the EastLake Affordable Housing
Program consists of the entire EastLake Greens Master
Tentative Subdivision Map area. including those portions of
the Eastlake Land Swap incorporated as part of a revision
to the EastLake Greens Master Tentative Subdivision Map
approved by the City Council in August, 1994.3 The total
number of units within the Phase I area is 3.192 units.
b. Proposed Affordable Housing Site Locations and Attributes.
The following sites have been targeted as proposed low-
income housing site(s) within or adjacent to the EastLake
Greens community. One site has been identified as the
primary site for the provision of housing units targeted for
low-income families, and it is anticipated that this site will be
built on within the next two years. Two secondary sites are
also identified in case the primary site cannot absorb the
total Phase I requirement of units (160 units). Moderate-
income sites are anticipated to be distributed throughout the
Greens neighborhood and have not been graphically
identified.
(1) Site #1 - Primary site
Site #1, depicted on Figure E (also identified as
Parcel R-26 on the Greens SPA plan). is a 24-acre
parcel of land located directly south of EastLake High
School and the S.D,G. & E. utility easement. This
parcel is bounded on the west by the SR125 right-of-
way 1 on the east by EastLake Parkway and on the
south by the future extension of East Palomar Street
and a large enclosed water storage facility. The
General Plan Land Use Diagram designates this
property as "Residential Medium-High" (RMH),
however, current entitlements permit only 4.5 dwelling
units per acre. A General Development Plan and
) As a result of a City Council-approved TenLative Subdivision Map condition which deferred the Greens affordable housing
requirements in 1989, a unique situation elllSU which hu permitted development to proceed within this planned community without
l&r~eting the construction of low-or moderate-income housing uniu As a result of this condition. the Greeas hu app101imately 1/3 of
iu 3.192 uniu completed. therefore. this Program anticipates the provision of .ffordable housing uniu in the short-term.
4.1-
/i
/}
......1
-~
SPA Plan Amendment will be required to enact the
RMH General Plan designation and, if approved at
mid-range densities, the property could permit up to
348 total units. The City Council approved the
General Plan density increase on this parcel after
considering compatibility with adjacent land uses, the
need to provide a balance of housing product types
and the increased opportunity to meet the Greens
affordable housing requirements. This site has been
reviewed by the Task Force for compatibility with the
selection criteria identified previously. The Task
Force has found that the site is compatible with
adjacent land uses, is located along a future express
bus transit route, and is approximately 1/4 mile from
a community park and a future retail shopping center.
(2) Site #2 - Secondary site
Site #2, depicted on Figure E (also identified as
Parcel R-9 on the Greens SPA Plan), is a 20-acre
parcel located west of the S'-D.G. & E. easement,
immediately north of future East Orange Avenue and
east of EastLake Parkway. This site is combined with
a 25-acre parcel of land located within the Land Swap
area, also located south and west of the 5. D. G. & E,
easement, immediately adjacent to Eastlake Parkway..
Access to Site #2 will likely be provided from
EastLake Parkway. However, this site will require
Prezoning and Annexation, the approval of a General
Development Plan and SPA Plan and the extension
of infrastructure (e.g., roadway, sewer, water, etc.).
Site #2 is identified as a supplemental site for the
provision of the balance of the 160 low-income units
required as part of Phase I of the EastLake Affordable
Housing Program. The Task Force has reviewed Site
#2 and finds that this site also meets the selection
criteria identified previously.
(3) Site #3 . Alternative Secondary site.
Site #3, depicted on Figure E, is a 17-acre site
located west offuture SR.125 and south of Telegraph
Canyon Road. This site is bounded on the west by
the S.D.G, & E. easement and future single family
-.,."'12-
'-/
/
residential development included in Village 5 of the
Otay Ranch. This site is currently designated' as
"Professional and Administrative" (permits commercial
office) on the General Plan Land Use Diagram. An
alternate secondary site has been selected for the
following reasons: (a) Site #2 may not be
developable within a reasonable timeframe due to
delays in the provision of infrastructure (e.g.,
extension of roads and utilities), and (b) Site #3, if
land use relationships are found to be compatible
through further planning analysis, has earlier
development potential due to proximity to support
services, minimal infrastructure needs, and close
access to transportation facilities. A revision to the
General Plan, Prezoning and Annexation of the
property, and the approval of a Precise Plan would be
required to implement the site as a low-income
housing site.
c. Implementation of Phase L
(1) Performance Criteria
The Eastlake Development Company, or its
successors, shall enter into a Affordable Housing
Agreement (AHA) with the City of Chula Vista to
construct 160 low-income housing units on Site #1,
as identified above. If all 160 low-income housing
units cannot be provided on Site #1, then the
agreement shall include provisions for the
construction of the remaining units on Site #2 or #3.
The Agreement shall delineate how and when the
units will be provided, including intended subsidies,
income/rent restrictions and methods to verify
compliance. Also included, shall be specific details
regarding site location, number of units, mix of
bedrooms for targeted units and the principals
involved in the funding and construction of the units.
The Agreement shall also identify the number,
location and pertinent financial data regarding the 160
moderate-income housing units to be located within
the Greens neighborhood, subject to the approval of
the Director of Community Development Department.
~~
j
(2) Enforceability
The Affordable Housing Agreement for Phase I of the
Eastlake Affordable Housing Program shall be
executed prior to the issuance of the 2.230th building
permit for the Eastlake Greens subdivision. This
benchmark is estimated to represent 70% of the
Greens project
Building Permits for those targeted units to be
developed on Site #1 shall be issued prior to approval
of the 2.550th unit of the Eastlake Greens
subdivision. This represents approximately 80% of
the units within the Eastlake Greens subdivision.
Building Permits for the remaining Phase I low-
income units targeted for Site #2 or #3 (if necessary)
shall be issued prior to approval of the 3.030th unit of
the Eastlake Greens subdivision, or 95% of the units
within the Eastlake Greens subdivision. The
extension of infrastructure may dictate this delay in
the provision of low-income housing .units.
The above benchmarks for performance are intended
to allow sufficient time for appropriate planning and
document approvals. and to ensure that affordable
housing units are constructed in a timely manner
along with other market-rate housing, If compliance
with the above policies are not adhered to. the City
shall not issue additional building permits for the
East/ake Greens subdivision until full compliance is
guaranteed.
(3) Potential Multiple Family Project
The City has initiated discussions between
experienced non-profit affordable housing developers
and Eastlake about the possibility of developing a
large apartment complex (120-160 units) on Site #1
for lower income families in Eastlake. Many non-
profit builders have extensive experience in
developing successful affordable housing projects
throughout California. In light of recent discussions,
the likelihood of short-term Phase I implementation
-~
.--;
-./
\
appears positive. It is anticipated that, based on the
Eastlake Development Company's construction
schedule and site negotiations, Site #1 could be
developed within 24 months of the d.te of this
program's adoption.
FIGURE E
POTENTIAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING SITES
f~
k-.
\-~
PHASE I AREA
LEGEND
o Potenti.' Affordable Houling Site,
PHASE I AREA
. . .. PHASE II AREA ~
/ /j
(Y-
3. Phase II - Future Efforts
a. Phase II Area Defined
The area defined as Phase II of the EastLake Affordable
Housing Program consists of all of the remaining
undeveloped areas within the EastLake community, as
graphically depicted in Figure E. These areas include the
Trails, Woods, Vistas, Village Center, Business Center and
the Land Swap.
b. Proposed Affordable Housing Site Locations and Attributes
As a result of the uncertainty of future amendments being
contemplated by Eastlake Development Company, as well
as unknowns regarding future economic conditions, Phase
II is not intended to be specific in terms of exactly where the
ultimate affordable housing sites for future Eastlake
development will occur, but rather give some idea of where
potential sites might be located, s.et up the regulatory
framework for future approvals, and provide guidelines for
implementation. Phase II shall be refined and appropriate
steps taken, as described below, concurrent with approval
of the first SPA Plan for the Woods, Trails. Vistas and
remaining Land Swap areas. Figure E depicts a total of
nine potential affordable housing sites that may be selected
to provide future low income units to be developed
concurrent with those development areas. As stated
previously in Phase I, these sites will require additional
planning review and analysis and consideration of the site
selection criteria discussed previously in Section 3D. These
proposed sites may also require, in most cases,
consideration of density transfers, increases and/or shifting
of land use locations.
c. Implementation of Phase II
(1) Performance Criteria I Enforceability
General Development Plan Amendments
Concurrent with the submittal of any revised General
Development Plan for the Trails, Woods and/or Vistas
the Eastlake Development Company, or its
~
/1
~
successors, shall identify the type and location of
proposed affordable housing site(s). Proposed
housing sites shall be reviewed for consistency with
this program and where there are differences
proposed, these shall be identified and addressed in
the General Development Plan.
SPA Plans
Each of the SPA Plans submitted for future
development areas, including the Trails, Woods and
Vistas, shall contain an affordable housing component
which shall be consistent with the governing General
Development Plan and with this Program. The City's
Housing Coordinator shall notify the Housing Advisory
Commission, and other interested parties, of pending
SPA hearings. The following information shall be
provided within subsequent SPA plans within the
Phase II area:
(a) Consistency with Affordable Housing Programs
The SPA plan housing section shall identify
how the plan is consistent with the City of
Chula Vista Housing Program as well as the
Eastlake Affordable Housing Program.
(b) Location of Affordable Housing Units -
The SPA plan housing section shall identify
where the affordable units will be located, by
income group, number, type and tenure.
(c) Phasing of Affordable Housing Units -
The SPA plan housing section shall include an
acceptable phasing program for the timely
provision of the affordable housing component
in the earliest development phase as possible.
~
.' -'. - .~.'/'-l
.I -_-:-._/ /
(e) Identify a/l local, state and federal incentive
and funding programs -
The SPA plan housing section shall identify all
funding programs which will be employed to
provide the reserved units, including but not
limited to density bonus programs, tax exempt
mortgage revenue bond financing, and the use
of non-profit partners. Where density bonuses
are intended. the SPA plan shall indicate the
following:
· the area or areas where such bonuses
are to be applied;
· the number of bonus units and total
project units within those area(s);
· the increased level of infrastructure
necessary to accommodate the units;
· the income level of affordability of the
bonus units;
· whether the bonus units are for families
or senior citizens;
· the duration of reservation.
(f) Alternate building technologies/materials
Indicate the extent to which alternate building
technologies and/or materials are proposed to be
used in both market rate and restricted units.
(g) Affordable Housing Agreement(s)
The housing component of each SPA Plan shall
identify the timing and contents expected with the
adoption of a Affordable Housing Agreement(s) (AHA)
which will guarantee the provision of the housing
units described in the plan. The formulation of such
agreement(s) shall be handled in a tiered fashion.
starting at the SPA level and progressing in specificity
.~
// _~/ . ~: ;J /"
and detail through subsequent planning processes,
with final project-specific agreements required prior to
the recordation of the respective final subdivision
map, or final project approval where the subdivision
of land is not involved. The following is an example
of the information to be contained in a agreement(s):
· Site acquisition, pre-development and
development.
The general financing strategies, the roles and
commitments anticipated of the various
players, including the City, Eastlake and/or
non-profits to bring projects about. Site
development issues, density bonus', DIF
payment deferrals, or any other concessions or
special processing considerations to be
requested of the City,
· Tenant / Owner Assistar)ce.
Define/describe, based on any identified
affordability "gaps". the type and amount of
individual household assistance programs
which may be needed to provide units to
qualifying families, Identify any issues this
might present to marketing, sales and/or
lending circumstances for the project developer
or Eastlake Development Company.
....*
IV. SUMMARY OF NECESSARY IMPLEMENTING ACTIONS
In order to ensure implementation of the various provisions of the Eastlake
Affordable Housing Program / Strategies as presented in this document, it will
be necessary for both the City and Eastlake Development Co. to meet certain
milestones during the course of future planning and permit processing for the
Eastlake Community over both the near and longer-term.
The following is thereby provided to clearly identify those actions required of the
City Council, staff, and/or Eastlake Development Co. during the continued
processing of the combined Eastlake projects so that prerequisites and
commitments necessary to eventually construct the affordable housing units are
achieved in a timely manner. Such prerequisites and commitments could range
from input on the necessity for any General Plan Amendments or prezonings to
create sufficient density, and/or the need for the City to consider density
transfers or clustering, housing product type mixes, or special financial incentives
during the review of future GDP, SPA and Tentative Map applications,
A. PHASE I IMPLEMENTATION TASKS
SITE #1
1, General Development Plan (GDP) Amendment
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake II General Development Plan.
2. Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake Greens SPA.
3. Design Review Committee
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for the site
plan and architectural design from City's Design Review
Committee.
4. Affordable Housing Agreement
Applicant shall negotiate and execute an agreement with the City
of Chula Vista for the guarantee of the prescribed number of
affordable housing units.
~
.-'" /' (
...< -----<:
SITE #2 (Lot R-9 of Eastlake Greens)4
1. General Development Plan Amendment
Applicant shall submit applications and obtajn approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake II General Development Plan (for Site
#2).
2. Submit Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake Greens SPA.
3. Design Review Committee
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for the site
plan and architectural design from City's Design Review
Committee.
4. Affordable Housing Agreement
Applicant shall negotiate and execute an agreement with the City
of Chula Vista for the guarantee of the prescribed number of
affordable housing units.
SITE #3 (If further planning analysis determines that this site meets the
criteria as a affordable housing site)
1, General Plan Amendment
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for a
General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for
Site #3 from "Commercial Professional & Administrative" to
"Residential Medium-High" (11-18 du/ac).
· Srle.2 is designated $)rimarily as Lot R.9 of Eastlake Greens, however, a portion of the Entlllke Lendlwap may be
considered for Phase I implementation If the number of Iow.income housing units for Phase 1(160 unlls) ere not accommodated
on Srle '1. Implementation would reQuire approval of . Prezoning end General Development Plan, Annexation. SPA Plan.
TentatIVe SubdIVISion Map Affordable HOUSing Agreement, Fmal SubdIVision Map end Design Review Committee approvals
-i:h
J' - ;L-Z ~!
SITE #2 (Lot R-9 of Eastlake Greens)"
1. General Development Plan Amendment
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake " General Development Plan (for Site
#2).
2. Submit Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for an
amendment to the Eastlake Greens SPA
3 Design Review Committee
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for the site
plan and architectural design from City's Design Review
Committee.
4. Affordable Housing Agreement
Applicant shall negotiate and execute an agreement with the City
of Chula Vista for the guarantee of the prescribed number of
affordable housing units.
SITE #3 (If further planning analysis determines that this site meets the
criteria as a affordable housing site)
1. General Plan Amendment
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for a
General Plan Amendment to change the land use designation for
Site #3 from "Commercial Professional & Administrative" to
"Residential Medium-High" (11-18 du/ac).
· Site.2 IS designlted primlrily IS Lot R.9 of eastllke Greens, however. I portion of the ealtllke ~ndlwlp may be
considered for Phlse I implementation If the number of low-income housing units for Phlse I (160 units) are not accommodlted
on Site .1. Implementation would require .pproval of I Prezoning and Generel Development Plen, Annex.tion, SPA Plan.
Tentative SubdIVISion Map, Affordable Housing Agreement. Fin.1 SubdivISion Map and Design Review Committee approvals
~.
'.::; ::';//
2. Prezoning
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approvals for a
prezoning of the 17 acre site to an appropriate Muliple-family
Residential zone.
3. Annexation
Applicant shall submit applications and obtain approval from the
City and LAFCO for annexation into the City of Chula Vista.
4. Design Review Committee
Applicant shall submit application and obtain approvals for the site
plan and architectural design from City's Design Review
Committee.
5, Affordable Housing Agreement
Applicant shall negotiate and execute an agreement with the City
of Chula Vista for the guarantee of the prescribed number of
affordable housing units.
B. PHASE " IMPLEMENTATION TASKS (Implementation tasks are similar
as those stated for Phase I above)
1. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Annexation
3. Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan
4. Tentative Subdivision Map
5. Affordable Housing Agreement
6. Final Subdivision Map
7. Design Review Committee
~
//
/.
"'; I
J;
APPENDICES
APPENDIX A -
APPENDIX 8-
APPENDIX C -
APPENDIX D-
APPENDIX E -
(\ISSUE1C PAPi
Responses to Questions Asked at Public Forum
Programs and Techniques for the Provision of Affordable Housing
Affordable Housing Requirements and Implementation Status
Employment Profiles by Income Group
Glossary of Terms
-;, _:/,:,7 (~
APPENDIX A
/j ~/ /'
/-. : /.........
APPENDIX A
RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS ASKED AT A PUBLIC FORUM
HELD ON SEPTEMBER 29,1994 AT EASTLAKE HIGH SCHOOL
Question: Why was there not more emphasis on home ownership opportunities
versus rentals?
Response: There is and will be an adequate supply of for-sale affordable housing
provided by market forces in Eastlake Greens. Three of the projects
currently being built and sold qualify as housing for moderate-income
families as defined by the affordable housing task force. Housing for low-
income families will be designed and built to the same standards as
housing for families in higher-income housing.
Quality rental housing has always been contemplated as being a part of
the Eastlake community plan. The emphasis her-e is quality which will
apply to the affordable housing that will be designed and built for
Eastlake.
Question: Will the apartment tenants belong to the homeowners association
and be able to use the facilities?
Response' It is not known yet whether the affordable housing residents will have their
own common area facilities and/or whether they will have access to the
homeowners' association facilities. If they do use homeowners'
association facilities. their use will be paid for in dues just like other
resident members of the association. There will be no free use of
homeowners' association facilities by any residents.
Question: Who's going to enforce the CC & Rs and take action on any
violations?
ReSDonse: The property management company. as part of its contract to manage the
housing units. will be reQuired to enforce the homeowners' association CC
& Rs as part of its overall management responsibilities of the property.
Question: Will the affordable housing owners be required to pay Mello-Roos?
Response: Yes. The Mello-Roos financing mechanism runs with the land,
irrespective of what income level of housing is built.
~
// )
/ /J (,.
,/
Question: Are you going to spread out the affordable housing units throughout
the community to avoid over.concentration or ghettos?
Response: First, it's important to keep in mind the affordable housing thatwill be built
in Eastlake is designed and built to the same appearance and
construction standards as housing for other families. The people who
already live and work in the community. Various affordable housing
projects will be located throughout the community.
Question: Will anyone neighborhood, such as Eastlake Greens, have to carry
the brunt of the affordable housing requirement for the entire
community?
Response: No The sites will be located in areas now being developed as well as
areas where future development will occur.
Question: Will the non.profit builder be local or trom out-ot-town?
Response' A non-profit provider is represented on the Eastlake Affordable Housing
Task Force and it is expected that participation by local non-profits in
providing the needed affordable housing for the Eastlake community will
occur.
~
,;
/j "/
~.::('./
APPENDIX B
.-'> ,"'-;
"'-", /
...-j'- ,
APPENDIX B
PROGRAMS AND TECHNI.QUES FOR
THE PROVISION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING
The following is a list of programs and strategies which have been successfully
implemented in the past which are designed to close the affordability gap. depending
on the uniqueness of each household.
These programs however, like most financial resources are limited and in most cases
not sufficient to meet the great need which exists for affordable housing. Additional
efforts are needed to continue to identify more methods and techniques for the
provision of affordable housing.
Affordable Housina Assistance Proarams
Development Stage
· Density Bonus - 20% of units set aside for low-income households,
reduction in site development standard and or other regulatory
concessions.
· Joint Venture Partnerships - Private and non-profit developers join
together each bringing unique incentives to table.
· Fee Waiver/Reduction . Development fee reduction contribution in
exchange for concessions.
· Land Set Asides - If unit construction by developer not feasible equitable
donation of building site for other entity to build.
. In Lieu Contributions - If project proven to be economically infeasible
acceptance of financial contribution in trust for affordable housing.
. OR-Site Projeef$ . Off.site location J)fovided it meets original
requirement.
. Non.Profit Housing Corporations . Specialized corporation - access to
private money - sole purpose is affordable housing.
"&1
-- I .".--~ .r
.--:; /
, ..OwnerlTenant Assistance Stage
· 1st Time Homebuyer Programs
-
Mortgage Credit Certificate. Federal Income Credit - 20% annual
credit against Federal income taxes. Value increases applicant
affords higher mortgage payment.
-
Silent Second Mortgage - No monthly payments, not due until
sale of unit.
-
Downpayment Assistance - Provides financial assistance to help
with down payment.
.
Section 8 Rental Assistance Certificates - Federal program which
provides financial assistance to qualified tenants with the difference
between 30% of their monthly income and fair market rent.
Funding Sources
. HOME. New Federal source of funds to promote housing production.
Funds can be used to acquire property, rehabilitation, new construction,
etc.
. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) . Federal funds
available to cities to promote housing and community development
activities.
. Housing Set Aside - 20% of redevelopment tax increment set aside for
housing projects.
. Mortgage Revenue Bonds - Tax exempt source of revenue for
production of units - restrict 20% of units for ten years - households under
80%.
. Federal Home Loan Sank-Affordable Housing Program - Nonprofits
apply through financial institutions for either direct equity subsidy or
interest-rate writedown on permanent loans. Funds both rental and
ownership projects at an average of $5,000 per unit.
. Low Income Housing Tax Credits (Federal and State of CA)-
Nonprofit and for-profit developers access these equity investments for
new construction of rental projects. Tax credits provide tax incentives for
corporations to invest as project general partners (developers are limited
.W:-
// ;::-? '7
~........." .I ..~.
partners). Project equity accessed through L1HTC syndicator like Mission
First Financial and California Equity Fund.
· State Bond Funds - In past years the State of California has had funding
available for low-interest loans for predevelopment, acquisition and
rehabilitation, self-help, mobile home park acquisition, and new
construction. Housing advocates are pushing for a new housing bond to
revive these programs.
· Local Initiatives Support Corporation (L/SC) - Through its local office,
this national non-profit offers low-interest, unsecured and secured loans
of early stage. predevelopment funds to community-based non-profits.
· Low Income Housing Fund, Savings end Mortgage Consortium
(SAMCO), and California Community Reinvestment Corp. (CeRe) -
Three different consortia of financial institutions providing below-market
rate predevelopment. construction, and permanent loans to non-profit
affordable housing developers.
. HOME-CHDO - 15% of City's HOME funds' must be utilized in
developments by community-based non-profit housing developers.
"~
""j
/; -'";
.../
APPENDIX C
/ '
.- ~/ ~J .~_/
u
)(
-
fn
~
~
<
~
fn
Z
o
i=
<
~
z
W
~>
W~
.J-
o..Z
~:;)
-~
O~
zo
<u
fnO
~w
ZZ
WZ
~<
W.J
IXCL
5w
O~
w<
IX.J
C)t;
Z<
c;;W
:;)
o
%
W
.J
m
<
c
IX
o
LL
LL
<
....
CL
D-
c:(
000 0 NM U"l CO CO ,... ,... 0
C'l(o U"l CO CO M M CO
-- N M
Cl I , I
Z 0 M CO
en (0 N ~
-- N
;:)Cc
OwO
%U2:
w;:) M-O - OM M CO CO ,... ,... C'l
~c NN e;. (0(0 N CO CO M M M
ceO M -- N f'I)
cO:: -
I I I
QD.~ CO -- ,...
~wO N C'l 0
&&.ce~ -- -- M
&&.0
<~
MC'lO N 00 0 0 0 0 0 N
N (0 C'l C'l
"
Z
ii)~
;:)<c
OCO
%62:
w~
c6c 0_0 -- 00 0 0 0 0 0 --
0 0 0
<w -- -- --
cu~
0::;:)
oCo
L&.0...l
L&.O::
<D.
1"")C'l0 N NI"") U"l CO CO ,... ,... -N
NI.O C'l C'l1.O U"l CO CO M I"") ,...
C) -- N ~
, , ,
z 0 M 0
en (0 N ~
;:) -- N "It
0 C
% 0
. 2:
.
W
...JZ MC'lO N OM M CO CO ,... ,... 0
mo N(o C'l (01.0 N CO CO M I"") "It
<- -- N "It
C~ I I ,
o::~~ CO -- CO
N C'l 0
0-0 -- -- "It
L&....l...l
L&.CD
<0
"It 00 "It NO N ,... ,... C'l C'l N
C U"lCO I"") C'l(o U"l (0 (0 M M C'l
"It M CO -- N "It ,... ,... ,... ,... ,...
~w -- -- M-- "It -- -- CD
Z >.
WO(/)
~O::~
~D._
:)C~. Z
UC[;:)
.!
Q ~ !
Cil
8 -
c: :
Cil .
% U . .
.
~ en Cil 1;; en m I i
0 ~~E ~~
Ie '0 i
% .- ~.- 15 C).=
" ::l:U>> ::l ::l ::l ::l
W Cil Cil Cil CJ') Cil Cil CJ') CJ') ell en
~~~ ~~ !!
Z .!L~ .!2 .!2.!2 <
'0u)Ui I 1n1ii I
w ~
x _ ell ell ell = ell ell - ell
~< CilWWW CilWW Cil .
~ ~ ~ CJ')
ell ell ell
cnw ;; ;; ;; ~
III III Kl
<0:: ell ell ell
w< w w W -'
/1 ;/ _j-
'C
Cil
'C
.~
Cl.
,8
.9
Cil
~
-
~
~
~
.~
Cil
c:
Cil
~
-
c:
~
'i
III
-
c:
Cil
E
!!
'S
~
Cl.
::l:
<
~
.e
B
c:
j
m
m
;;
~si
- .0
8. 'in
ell
ell Cil
-
III c:
Cil .-
:2,8
~ 0
~-
~~
.5.2 >
1~
8,la
~!!
-- ell
~
'Cil
.~ 0 '8
,1 ~ E
~C:-cUg~
--::l:Zi..2U"l
. < ell 0 _
-- -'E ~ .
~EOa::..2
,8e=i=~
E~ gU"l
.!!D.~::l!t:
Cl. 00
~OluU!J1
"" .E .Sf '5 5
g en Cil U
en 8 ~ ; .Sf
ell::l: Cil -= Cil
-I :! 'g .~ ~
li~H
i~~j~
g..f i
. III'T
Ol;iC/l,!
i~ftl~~
1iii s"lt
I ~ I ~~
ilie~
~:2Kl~~
~
z. :
t
~
c:
::l
~
e
~
~
ell
Cil
~
-
-
o
::J!.
o
U")
en
!!
'S
W
~
.
.
.
APPENDIX 0
~, ./1
""" .---; '.
APPENDIX 0
EMPLOYMENT PROFILES BY INCOME GROUP
(Based on a Family of Four)
Very Very Low Very Low Low Moderate
35% Median 50% Median 80% Median 120% Median
$15,890 $22,700 $36,300 $54.500
($7.64 per hr.) ($10.91 per hr.) ($17.45 per hr.) ($26.20 per hr.)
Dental Assistant Secretary Librarian III Fire Captain
Retail Manager ClerkfTypist Assistant Planner Superv, Economist
Bookkeeper I Machinist Biologist II Associate Engineer
Teller Auto Mechanic Fire Fighter II Mainten Superv.
Stock Clerk Welder Accountant II Associate Planner
WalterlWaltress Truck Driver Building Inspector I Property Agent
Nurses Aid Deputy City Clerk Senior Buyer Sr. Plan Techn.
Custodian I Tree Tnmmer Junior Engineer Police Sergeant
Pool Guard I Lifeguard I Park Designer
Library Aide Cashier District Manager
Recreation Aide Account Clerk
/"" ---
~"""1 ..-.~ ~..,
-,
,/ ','
APPENDIX E
~-""'-1;:'; /.
-'\~- .' ~-
APPENDIX E
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
Affordable Housing - Residential housing units, either rentals or for-sale. that are
targeted for families which qualify within pre-determined income levels.
Affordable Housing Program (AHP) - A program that provides an action plan for
providing affordable housing units.
Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) - A legally-binding contract between the City
and the developer of residential units that defines the terms (Le., number and size of
units, prices, etc.) that targeted affordable housing units will be sold or rented for.
Affordability "gap" - The difference between what a family can afford to pay for
housing and what the market price is.
Annexation - Incorporation of property within the jurisdiction of a city. Most services
(e.g., sewer, police and fire protection, etc.) are typically provided by the governing
jurisdiction,
Building Permit - Authorization given by the governing jurisdiction (City) to construct
one or more structures.
Density - The number of residential units that can be built within a single acre of land.
Final Subdivision Map - The final recorded legal documents which establish a
division of land. Typically submitted to the City, these documents include final grading
plans, erosion control plans, legal descriptions of property and deed restrictions.
General Development Plan (GDP) - A plan, consisting of a map diagram and text,
which is. required to accompany the application of the PC (Planned Community) Zone.
This plan depicts a refinement of land use arrangements generally described on the
city's General Plan.
General Plan - A document consisting of diagrams and text which identify or describe
goals for the future physical, social, and economic development for the City of Chula
Vista as well as the public policies to attain those goals.
Housing Element. A State of California-mandated element of the City's General Plan
embodying a comprehensive analysis and update of basic housing data and growth
projections as well as goals, objectives, policies and programs to address housing
~
/-- i
-"7 ~, /7~
-.-I -., /
:.;,.., --'"
needs in the City. The Housing Element was revised in 1991 and is required to
updated every five years.
Low-Income - Household whose annual income is between 50% and 80% of the
median income for the area ($36,300 in 1994).
Land Swap - A total of approximately 161 acres of land located south and west of
Eastlake Greens that was obtained from the Baldwin Company, developer of the
adjacent Otay Ranch, in exchange for the 160-acre Eastlake N development property
located on the west side of future SR-125.
Moderate-Income - Household whose annual income is between 80% and 120% of
the median income for the area ($54,500 in 1994).
Market-rate housing - For sale or rental housing built and made available to the
public without any public or private subsidy and sold or rented based on supply and
demand market conditions of the area.
Prezonlng - The application of certain uniform regulations and requirements or various
combinations thereof to a property being considered for annexation into the City. Upon
annexation, these regulations and requirements would apply to- activities that occur on
the property.
SANOAG - San Diego Association of Governments. An organization consisting of staff
and policy makers representing each of the City's within the County of San Diego, as
well as the County of San Diego, charged with administering regional planning policies.
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan - All Planned Community (PC) zones in the City
shall be divided into sectional planning areas. These areas of subcommunities shall
be depicted on the plan diagram of the general development plan of a PC zone.
Tentative Subdivision Map - In order to divide a parcel of land into 5 or more parcels
or create a condominium ownership of 5 or more units, a map, recognized by the State
of California, must be filed with the agency having jurisdiction over the land where he
subdivision is proposed.
Very Low-Income - Household whose annual income is at or under 50% of the
median income for the area ($22,700 in 1994). .
(:\EASTl.AKE\.t.PP~NOlX)
&2:
/",
~,; ,.. j i"'./
-{ ", .''";
8tri]ccut/ll!:i:lnl version
-AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN-
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA
October 27, 1992
Revised 3/22/94lfllflll,i
Approved by City Council Resolution No. _
-Date-
Prepared for:
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100
Chula Vista, CA 91914
Prepared by:
JA Y KNIEP LAND PLANNING
(916) 541-1817
,/i /; /-;.::,
" ~_I '7
Table of Contents
Paqe
I . EXECUTIVE SUMMARy................................. 1
II. INTRODUCTION...................................... 3
A. Purpose
B. Planning Context
C. Goals
D. Approach
E. Roles and Responsibilities
III. AIR QUALITY LEGISLATION AND PLANS................. 7
A. Background
B. Air Quality Plan Requirements
C. Transportation Control Measures
D. Indirect Source Regulations
E. Transportation Demand Management
F. Public Transit Planning and Service
IV. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS............................... 15
A. Existing Climate/Air Quality Conditions
B. Project Air Quality Impacts
V. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES................... 24
VI. MONITORING/CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
A. Monitoring
B. Conclusion/Analysis of Significance
VI I. REFERENCES........................................ 27
.;;;i ..
~ .'j'f y/ /)-
- "'--. .'-- /~ - '
/'.- J' ~-_ I I
I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this Air Quality Improvement Plan for the EastLake
Greens sectional Planning Area (SPA) is to respond to the Growth
Management policies of the City of Chula Vista. The most signifi-
cant air quality improvement measures are those policies and
regulations established at the broadest geographic level, i.e.,
State and Federal. However, there are measures that can be applied
on a city or project level which can have a positive impact. This
report presents an overview of these issues, and offers the
following improvement measures which are to be implemented at the
local level.
1. Pedestrian and Bicvcle Paths: The EastLake General Develop-
ment Plan, and subsequent SPA Plans, adopted by the city have
emphasized the use of an extensive trail system, connecting
acti vi ty centers, to enable non-vehicular travel. The proj ect
is designed with a single loop collector connecting the
majority of residential development and simplifying internal
circulation. The clustering of "activity uses" (high school,
community park, and retail) at a central location within the
community encourages the use of non-vehicular modes of travel
to these destinations.
There has also been a suggestion that programs to encourage
pedestrian and bicycle travel could be applied, such as
reduced parking availability at retail centers. These
concepts would require City-wide debate to fully appreciate
competing goals, and are not applicable at the project level.
2. Jobs/Housinq Balance: The EastLake General Development Plan,
adopted by the City, includes job opportunities, recreation,
education, retail and service commercial, and public facili-
ties within the community. Full implementation of the
community plan would minimize the length and number of
automobile trips because of the range of opportunities and
services available within the community.
3. Access To Reqional Systems: The LOS requirements applied to
development within the EastLake Greens SPA will encourage
free-flow travel, which reduces air emissions. However, there
are those who argue that transit use is actually enhanced by
congestion. These competing approaches to air quality
improvements need to be reviewed as City-wide policy to
determine the appropriate balance.
4. Transit Access: The project circulation will improve routes
for transit. Transit stops can be incorporated where desired
at key intersections without significant plan modification.
The clustering of transit destinations (i.e., schools,
shopping and employment) encourages the use of public transit
and simplifies routing and scheduling.
Rev. (03122194fP:t!~0~a)
.:1;;
//J-
,-0
r-
5. Educational Proqrams: The master developer will participate
in an educational program for residents of homes within the
EastLake Greens SPA. This program could also be coordinated
as part of a larger City-wide program to inform residents of
the services and alternative transportation options available
to them.
6. Park-and-Ride Facilities: The provision of a Park-and-Ride
facility in proximity to the project is anticipated. Con-
struction of such a facility is required in the EastLake
village Center, located just north of the project site. Such
a Park-and-Ride facility could also provide a staging area for
carpools, vanpools, and transit vehicles. This facility
should be incorporated into a city-wide system of similar
facilities coordinated with public transit routes, including
future light rail corridors.
7. Local and Reqional Air Oualitv Requlations: A new Air Quality
Plan is currently being formulated will supersede the 1982
SIP. This plan, which is projected for adoption prior to the
full implementation of development within the EastLake Greens
SPA, will include increased standards and regulatory measures
to mitigate this as well as other anticipated growth in the
San Diego Air Basin. EastLake will be subject to compliance
with these regulations and mitigation measures as they evolve.
8. Development Monitorinq: The Design Review process provides a
point for monitoring the inclusion of on-site transit stops
and trail linkages. In addition, this development will be
subject to the ongoing monitoring programs inherent in the
city's Transportation Phasing Plan and Growth Management
Program.
These local mitigation measures might have a minimal impact on Air
Quality in quantifiable terms, but their enhancement of future
transit options and public awareness should have a greater long
term public benefit.
Rev. (Q3/22/94fPt~~Z~~)
~.
/ --./' ////"
/-i-__,~ ' <r_~
II. INTRODUCTION
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Air Quality Improvement Plan is to respond
to the Growth Management Policies of the city of Chula vista.
The city has looked comprehensively at issues dealing with
development and the additional impacts it places on public
facili ties and services. The Growth Management Program
implements the Growth Management Element of the General Plan
and establishes an orderly process to carry out the develop-
ment policies of the city. The primary area of focus of the
Growth Management Program is east of 1-805 where most of the
remaining vacant land is located, including the project site.
B. Planning context
The planning context for this air quality plan ranges from
state-wide and regional considerations to local planning
requirements. The California Clean Air Act (CCAA) forms the
basis for most air quality management efforts. It is the
driving mechanism to the current revision to the San Diego Air
Basin Air Quality Management Plan by the regional Air Pollu-
tion Control District (APCD).
At the local level, cities must carry out their fair-share
responsibilities within a day-to-day decision making framework
to ensure attainment of the regional standards and obj ecti ves.
Although specific local policies have not been adopted, Chula
vista is actively participating, through the growth management
program and other efforts, in the regional endeavor to
establish effective long term regional strategies to implement
the air quality standards and objectives.
The California Air Resources Board (ARB) has classified the
San Diego region as having a severe air pollution problem
because the region will not comply with state standards until
some time after 1997. According to the San Diego Air Pollu-
tion Control District (APCD), the major sources of air
pollutants in the region are motor vehicles and pollution
blown in from Los Angeles. Given this situation, local air
quali ty improvement efforts are focused on transportation
issues. To address air quality problems related to transpor-
tation, level of service standards for arterials, highways and
transit are being developed, as are goals for reducing solo
auto trips.
Actions necessary to achieve state and federal clean air
standards, and transportation system management (TSM) and
transportation demand management (TDM) objectives include:
reducing solo auto trips by carpooling and using transit
Rev. (Q3122191~Al~~V~e)
~
",
-:;
'-,
~.
promoting telecommuting and staggered work schedules
improving transit service
building additional high occupancy vehicle lanes
coordinating traffic signals and implementing other
circulation system improvements
reducing trip lengths through jobs/housing balance, mixed
use development and focusing development near transit
stations
The regional plans required by state law are now being
prepared by SANDAG and the APCD. Although the areas of focus
are well known and alternative measures have been offered for
review and comment, specific guidelines and standards have not
yet been adopted. Thus a direct comparison or evaluation of
the measures included in this plan with regional standards
cannot be made at this time. However, because of the commer-
cial nature of this project and the transportation focus of
the specific measures expected to be adopted in the regional
plan, project level consistency will be based on operational
requirements (e.g., employee commuting, goods movement/truck
operations, etc.) and design parameters. Design parameters
will include project access and parking management/pricing
which could be a design issue (i.e., reduce parking require-
ments to create a shortage so that users would be induced to
use public transit or ride-share). The following chapter will
more fully detail these issues.
At the local level, within Chula vista, there is no local air
quality plan. However, the City Council has adopted the
Growth Management Program which requires Air Quality Improve-
ment Plans for major development projects (50 residential
units or commercial/industrial projects with equivalent air
quality impacts). This report for the EastLake Greens SPA has
been prepared to meet that requirement. Although such plans
are required, the city has not established any guidelines,
criteria, or other requirements for content or scope of such
plans. Additionally, the city has not adopted an Air Quality
Plan or element to its General Plan to establish local policy
in this area. Because no local plan exists or is in prepara-
tion, project compliance will need to be measured against the
anticipated requirements of the regional plan.
c. Goals
The following are goals of the EastLake Greens SPA Air Quality
Improvement Plan:
1. To minimize air quality impacts during and after con-
struction of projects within the EastLake Greens SPA.
Rev. (bl3/22/94t:9t~!t.?;~)
'4=-
/ ') ,,?<~i yL/
2. To comply with the air quality standards and policies of
the City of Chula vista and San Diego County APCD.
3. To create a framework for the design and implementation
of air quality mitigation measures in these residential
development projects.
4. To be economically efficient and cost effective.
D. Approach
~he approach to air quality mitigation outlined in this plan
lS focused on the strategies and measures available to
residential development projects. As will be described in the
next chapter, few transportation/air quality improvements
measures in the state and regional plans are addressed to
these projects. The majority address transportation system
efficiency, alternative transportation modes, heavy vehicle
restrictions, and increased vehicle occupancy. None of these
are directly influenced or effected by residential develop-
ment. Some measures are available however, and these are
described and incorporated into the project as appropriate.
These include integration of land uses, construction of
facilities to support public transportation, and the provision
of private group transportation where feasible. Efforts to
educate and increase awareness of the need to minimize air
quality impacts and the opportunities to do so, will be
directed toward future residents. The roles and responsibili-
ties of all affected parties are described in the following
section.
E. Roles and Responsibilities
In order for this plan to be effective, it is necessary to
clearly assign appropriate roles and responsibilities to all
of the participants in the development and occupancy phases of
projects within the EastLake Greens SPA. There are three
primary groups involved: developer/builders; government/ser-
vice agencies; and future residents/tenants. Each has an
important role to play, as described below.
1. Develooer/Builders
The master developer, EastLake Development Company, is
providing the basic planning, design, and management of this
program. Community level transportation facilities, vehicular
and non-vehicular, will be implemented by the master develop-
er.
Individual builders will construct homes according to the
standards set by the master developer (and the City) and will
be responsible for energy planning and management within their
Rev. (Q3/22/9~tl~X!{~0f~)
..,5
/"",,' /J .1'/ /-.
..-< <.. /' ./ j
own project. Builders will also be the primary communicators
with homebuyers. In this role, they will be responsible for
identifying the energy conservation features incorporated in
the project, and educating homebuyers regarding a continuing
conservation effort.
2. Property Owners/Residents/Tenants
The long term success of the air quality mitigation effort
rests with residents who choose their own modes of transporta-
tion, driving habits and lifestyles. In the aggregate,
choices by residents/tenants affect the air quality in the
region more than any effort by the city or developer.
Generally, commercial and industrial are the land uses which
have significant opportunities to incorporate air quality/
transportation mitigation measures because of the concentrated
number of automobile trips associated with them. The decision
to utilize public transit or non-vehicular transportation will
rest with future residents, influenced by the availability and
convenience of such facilities.
3. Government/Service Aqencies
The city of Chula Vista will review project plans and monitor
this plan. Because of its development approval role, the city
can effectively enforce transportation phasing and other
standards for new construction. Some local public transporta-
tion systems are operated under authority of the City, in
cooperation with regional operators. The City can also be a
source of on-going education and air quality awareness through
citizen communication programs.
The San Diego APeD will adopt regional air quality plans which
will implement measures to meet State and Federal standards.
Although these plans will focus primarily on transportation
issues, land use and indirect source guidelines will also be
included. state law prohibits the intrusion of the APCD on
the land use decision authority of the City, so it will be up
to the City to implement any such guidelines.
To a certain extent, the local school districts also have a
role to play based on the transportation they offer to
students. Bussing of students to school facilities, instead
of parent auto trips, can have beneficial effects in the same
way that using public transit for employment commuting reduces
total trips, improving air quality and traffic congestion.
Rev. (Q3/22194~tM~~t~!)
'.
, J
/ '
/ ,
- '7 ~/
..:7"'. /
III. AIR QUALITY LEGISLATION AND PLANS
A. Background
Based on air quality data from the regional air quality
monitoring network, the California Air Resources Board
classif ied San Diego County as a "non-attainment area II for the
State Ozone (03) and Inhaleable Particulate Matter (PM10) Air
Quality Standards. In addition, the western portion of the
County was classified "non-attainment" for the state Nitrogen
Dioxide (N02) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) Standards. The eastern
portion of the County is classified "attainment" for these
standards.
Ozone is the principal pollutant of concern in San Diego
County. Because violations of the CO and N02 standards are
marginal compared to the significant 03 problem, the principal
focus of the regional air quality effort will directed toward
reducing reactive organic gases and oxides of nitrogen, which
are ozone precursors.
The ARB motor vehicle pollution control program will continue
to provide significant reactive hydrocarbon, oxides of
nitrogen, and CO reductions from motor vehicles. Transporta-
tion control measures will also reduce these emissions. Since
80% of the region's CO and 50% of the N02 pollution is from
on-road motor vehicles, this combination of measures will
substantially contribute to attaining and maintaining these
two standards. While transportation control measures and
motor vehicle emission controls will be major elements in the
CO and N02 control program, additional stationary source
control measures may be necessary to control oxides of
nitrogen.
B. Air Quality Plan Requirements
1. Involved Aqencies
The four agencies involved in the air quality planning process
are the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) , which is
responsible for the administration of the federal Clean Air
Act; the state Air Resources Board (ARB), which is responsible
for the implementation of the California Clean Air Act of
1988; the San Diego County Air Pollution control District
(APCD), which is responsible for the development of the Air
Quality Plan mandated by the state Clean Air Act and for
regulating the emissions in the region; and SANDAG, which is
responsible for the preparation of the transportation control
measures component of the Air Quality Plan. The Plan is to be
consistent with the traff ic congestion management and regional
growth management plans also being prepared by SANDAG. within
this context of a long term strategy to be carried out by the
Rev. ((;)3/22 / 91+~Mf{~t~?")
':;::..
// /) ,. _ :; 1/,/
state and the APCD, Chula vista can also do its fair share,
although it does not have a formal role in formulating the
plan. state law does provide for the delegation of adminis-
tration of APCD Regulations to local agencies if the following
conditions are met:
Measures adopted and implemented are as stringent as the
District's measures.
The local agencies submitting an implementation plan have
sufficient resources and the District approves the plan.
The District adopts procedures to audit local agency
performance to insure compliance. The District can
revoke the delegation for inadequate performance.
Any land use provisions of the adopted plan will ultimately be
the responsibility of the city as state law prohibits the APCD
from intruding in this area.
2. Air Oualitv Standards
Attainment of air quality standards is based on federal and
state law which establishes such standards, with the state
standards more strict than federal standards (see Table 1).
Given this situation, compliance with state law will generally
lead to conformance with federal law.
The California Clean Air Act of 1988 requires that each air
district develop and submit a plan by July 1991 showing how
the district will achieve the mandated standards. In their
plans, the districts must consider all emission sources,
independent of transport into the air basin. Each district
not in attainment of the standards by 1994 must reduce non-
attainment pollutants or their precursors by an average of 5%
per year, beginning from the 1987 levels. The plan must also
demonstrate that improved air quality will be maintained after
attainment; thus, the plan must have provisions for continued
air quality improvement to accommodate growth. The plan must
contain transportation control measures, transportation system
measures, and direct source regulations.
Rev. (03/22 /91f:Pt~!Z:!a)
:S':
-1
.-~
~ C7
.:1
:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:.::':.:.:.:.:'::':.:o:.::.:~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:o:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:o:.:.:o:.:.:.:.:.:~.:.:~.....:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:........~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:<<0:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:-"..:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:o:.:.:.:.:.:o:.:.:.:o:.:.:.:.:.:o:-:.:-:.~:.:.:0:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:':':-:-:0:.:.=.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.=.:.:.:.:':':0:.:-:..:.:':0:.:.
Table 1
Ambient Air Quality standards
pollutant
Averaging
Time
California
standard
National
Standard
Ozone
1 hour
0.09 ppm
0.12 ppm
Carbon Monoxide 8 hour 9.0 ppm 9 ppm
1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm
Nitrogen Annually 100 IJg /m3
Dioxide 1 hour 0.25 ppm
Sulfur Dioxide Annually 80 IJg/m3
24 hour 0.05 ppm 0.14 ppm
1 hour 0.25 ppm
Suspended Annual Mean 30 1J9 fm3 50 IJgfm3
Particulate
Matter (PM 10) 24 hour 50 IJgfm3 150 IJgfm3
Sulfates
24 hour
25 IJg/m3
Lead
30 days
Calendar
Quarter
1. 5 IJg /m3
1. 5 IJg/m3
Hydrogen
Sulfide
1 hour
0.03 ppm
Vinyl Chloride
(chloroethene)
24 hour
0.010 ppm
Visibility
Reducing
Particulates
1 Observation
Visibility of
10 miles when
humidity is
<70%.
ppm = parts per million
.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:~.:.:.:.:.:o:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:~.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:.:0:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:':-:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:':.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:.:0:0:.:.:.:-:.:-:':.:.:.:':-:':.:.::':0:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:.:.:0:.:-:.:.:.:-:.=.:.:.:-:....:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:
Rev. ((;;l3/22191~P0rp;~Z!!)
~
// .
, ~
/i//Y
..../.' '
3. Mandated Measures
Because the San Diego region is classified "severe", specific
controls are required by state law. These are: the best
available retrofit control technology for existing sources; a
permitting program that mitigates emission increases from all
new and modified sources; reasonably available transportation
control measures; indirect and area source control measures;
and, specifically, transportation control measures to hold
vehicle emissions constant after 1997 and achieve an average
commute-time ridership of 1.5 persons per vehicle by 1999, and
measures to achieve use of a significant number of low-
emission vehicles by fleet-operators.
If the region cannot meet the 5% annual reduction standard,
then the next best level of reduction is to be achieved. The
Act authorizes the ARB to adjust the emission reduction target
for individual areas, if two legal conditions are met. First,
the Plan must include all feasible measures and the region
must be expeditiously implementing the Plan. Based on the
currently available data, the APCD believes that the 5% annual
reduction will not be met and thus the "all feasible measures"
standard will be applied.
c. Transportation control Measures
In November 1990, the APCD Board adopted criteria for develop-
ing a transportation control measures (TCM) plan. The plan is
being prepared by SANDAG according to the criteria of APCD,
and, once completed, the plan will be implemented through
district regulations and transportation system improvements.
The TCM criteria addressed six major areas: transportation
demand management (reduction in number vehicle trips & heavy
duty vehicle restrictions); alternative transportation mode
capacity expansion (public transit, park and ride, high
occupancy vehicle facilities & bicycle/pedestrian facilities) ;
transportation system management (traffic signals & incident
management); land use (jobs/housing balance, mixed use
development & focused development); market based incentives
(fees & taxes); and, driving restrictions.
Regulations which will be proposed to meet these criteria
could include:
1. Ride sharing and van pool programs.
2. Employer subsidized transit ticket passes.
3. Flexible work schedules to accommodate ride sharing and
transit.
Rev. (() 3/22,' 91 fP:t'~~0~!)
,*3
/ -. /, /.'
,,/ J ,,~,~)
4. Telecommuting and teleconferencing.
5. Parking incentives to support ride sharing.
6. Trip management education.
7. Limiting heavy duty truck traffic during peak commute
periods and reducing the number of trips through better
fleet management.
8. Measures to reduce trips to large facilities.
In addition, the Air Quality Plan will contain transportation
system measures to attempt to reduce motor vehicle pollution
utilizing some of the following measures:
1. Adding more high occupancy vehicle by pass ramps and
lanes.
2. Improving transit services.
3. Special bridge toll rates for drivers who ride share.
4. Increase bus fleets and upgrading of vehicles.
5. Development of long range policies supporting vehicle
trip reduction.
D. Indirect Source Regulations
A residential development is considered an indirect source in
that it generates/attracts motor vehicle trips, although the
homes themselves do not directly impact air quality. Because
all feasible measures will be required, indirect source
measures will be included in the Plan. The focus of these
provisions will be to reduce motor vehicle-related emissions,
although measures addressing aspects of development such as
improved energy conservation could be included. Key elements
for indirect source regulation would include the following:
1. New source review and approval prior to construction.
2. Determine if the project is consistent with the APCD Air
Quality Plan.
3. Analysis of the location, distance, time of day, vehicle
occupancy and mode split.
4. Assess the quantity of air pollution which could result
from the project.
Rev. ("3/22 /9~f:!Z!l~t:~g)
tt
/1 -/
../ F..
5. Require the best available design to reduce trips,
maintain or improve traffic flow, reduce vehicle miles
traveled and implement appropriate transportation control
measures.
6. Define the means for monitoring results.
7. Issue a permit specifying air quality construction and
operating requirements to provide a basis for determining
on going compliance.
8. Incorporate energy conservation measures/opportunities in
new construction.
E. Transportation Demand Management
As noted earlier, other planning programs are currently
underway which should be coordinated with the Air Quality
Plan. Currently, the city of Chula vista is participating in
the regional effort to implement the transportation demand
management (TOM) ordinance. city staff is evaluating the
model TOM ordinance prepared by SANDAG. The near term focus
of the regional transportation demand program will be on the
largest components of the principal traffic stream including
emploYment travel, college and university student travel, and
goods movement. The objectives for each of the larger traffic
components are as follows:
1. The objectives of the freeway traffic element policies
and programs shall lead to the achievement of a 1.4
average vehicle occupancy rate for all area freeways
during the principal travel period by the year 2000 and
a 1.5 average vehicle occupancy rate by the year 2010.
2. The objectives of the emploYment traffic element policies
and programs shall lead to the achievement of a 50% drive
alone ratio for region wide emploYment traffic during the
principal travel period by the year 2000 and 40% drive
along ratio by the year 2010.
3. The objectives of the college and university traffic
element policies and programs shall lead to the achieve-
ment of a 50% student drive along ratio by the year 2000;
and a 40% student drive along ratio by the year 2010.
4. The objective of the goods movement traffic element
policies and programs shall lead to the achievement of a
25% reduction in goods movement traffic during the
principle travel period by the year 2000; and a 35%
reduction by the 2010.
Rev. (g 3,'.2.2 / 9 ~ +:Plfl:tt~ff)
.l,:Z;.
I -- ~____~'i ,'~~ /j
~.^
violation of the transportation demand management ordinance as
currently proposed may constitute a violation of the Regional
Air Quality Plan.
The basic requirements of the transportation demand management
ordinance will be to require employers to prepare plans to
carry out the objectives of the program and to file annual
reports showing the degree of compliance with said standards.
In addition, each college and university will develop,
implement and promote student commute alternatives in order to
achieve the regional college university student drive along
targets.
Finally, with respect to the goods movement/trucking traffic
element, each business providing goods movement/traffic
trucking services shall develop, implement and promote a non-
peak period delivery program as well as other measures to
further reduce truck traffic during the principal travel
period which is to defined as between 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
through 1995 after which time it shall be 6:00 a.m. to 9:00
a.m.
The draft version of Regulation XIV embodying these objectives
is currently being processed by the local air quality agen-
cies. Although it will take time to finalize and implement
the regulation, the importance of Reg. XIV in regulating some
portion of transportation-related air quality impacts is
undeniable.
F. Public Transit Planninq and Service
The EastLake Community is currently served by a local bus
route, although preliminary planning for light rail service to
the region is underway. Increased use of public mass transit
is a primary objective to achieve improved air quality.
1. Current Transit Service
Chula vista Transit Route 709 provides bus service to the
EastLake community. The route which began service in July
1991 has an average ridership of 150 persons per day.
Downtown San Diego commuters can make their daily trip via a
20 minute bus ride to the "H" street Trolley station and
continuing to downtown via the trolley.
Until such time as the South Bay Light Rail Service is
initiated, Chula Vista Transit will be the only mass transit
service to EastLake. The City does not currently have a
planned transit expansion program for developing areas in the
eastern territories. Transit officials expect to use the MTDB
South Bay Public Transportation Plan (due in late 1992) as a
guide in phasing and expanding service to the area. The
Rev. (() 3/22,' 91 ~~t~~0~f;) ,u..
/ ~) _~:l~:~;
current expansion policy, while not written, attempts to
provide bus service where sufficient ridership is available.
Funding for the Chula Vista Transit service is provided by
fare box revenues (40%) and the ~% state sales tax proceeds.
2. Future Transit Planninq
In March 1991 SANDAG completed the "South Bay Rail Transit
Extension study". The report evaluated the feasibility of
extending light rail (trolley) and commuter rail service in
the South Bay. Specifically the light rail service required
to serve the eastern territories of Chula vista and Imperial
Beach was evaluated using cost and ridership estimates as a
measure of performance and feasibility. Potential land use
patterns to support rail transit service were also evaluated.
Three light rail corridors were determined worthy of further
study. Alternative "E" which traverses the southwest portion
of the EastLake Greens SPA and crosses the proposed alignment
of SR-125 at Palomar Road, approximately one-half mile south
of Telegraph Canyon Road, has been identified as having the
best performance of all alternatives studied.
The South Bay Rail Transit Extension Study was accepted by the
SANDAG Board and a follow-up study being administered by the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) is currently
underway. This study, the "South Bay Public Transportation
Plan," will:
Assemble existing short range public transportation plans
for the South Bay.
Prepare a South Bay seven-year public transportation
plan.
Identify major transit facilities.
Develop a staging plan.
Study proposed guide-way transit corridors and station
locations.
Study adequacy of existing land use plans as they relate
to supporting mass transit.
No funding source has been identified for the proposed light
rail extensions and the currently programmed MTDB extensions
are currently under-funded. The State propositions 108 and
111 which passed in 1990 have provided significant funds for
MTDB near term projects, however the rail extension project is
very long term in nature.
Rev. (Q3/2219t~Pl!!Z:~~)
--I:4-
-. "".! c- L /
/1.:....) - <-..~___ ./ 7
IV. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS
This chapter discusses the Air Quality Impacts associated with the
build-out of development within the EastLake Greens SPA. Informa-
tion from the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the
project has been utilized with some modification to reflect the
project "as approved. II The EIR addressed a project totaling 3,609
residential units while the revised project consists of 2,871:g;i17:i:~:
units.....
A. Existing Climate/Air Quality Conditions
1. Climate
The climate of the Chula vista area, as with all of Southern
California, is controlled largely by the strength and position
of the subtropical high pressure cell over the Pacific Ocean.
It maintains moderate temperatures and lower humidities, and
limits precipitation to a few storms during the winter "wetll
season. Temperatures are normally mild with rare extremes
above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below freezing.
winds in the City of' Chula vista are almost always driven by
the dominant land/sea breeze circulation system. Regional
wind patterns are dominated by daytime on-shore sea breezes up
to 20 miles per hour with an average of 7 miles per hour. At
night, the wind generally slows and reverses direction,
traveling towards the sea. Wind direction is altered by local
canyons, with winds tending to flow parallel to the canyons.
The on-shore flow of air provides the driving mechanism for
both air pollution transport and dispersion. The winds
described above control the horizontal transport in the
region. The interior valleys of San Diego County also have
numerous temperature inversions that control the vertical
extent through which pollutants can be mixed. When the on-
shore flow of cool, marine air undercuts a large dome of warm,
sinking air within the oceanic high pressure area, it forms a
marine/subsidence inversion. These inversions allow for good
local mixing, but act like a giant lid over the larger area.
As air moves inland, sources add pollution from below without
any dilution from above. The boundary between the cool air
near the surface and the warm air aloft is a zone where air
pollutants become concentrated. As the air moves inland and
meets elevated terrain, inland foothill communities are
exposed to many of the trapped pollutants within this most
polluted part of the inversion layer.
A second inversion type forms when cool air drifts into lower
valleys at night and pools on the valley floor. These
radiation inversions are strongest in winter when nights are
longest and air is coldest. They may lead to stagnation of
Rev. (() 3/22/ 91 +Ptll~//)~#) ,~
/' -., /, -< "
/._. ,i /( _ _J
ground-level pollution sources such as automobile exhaust near
freeways or major parking facilities.
2. Air Oualitv
To assess the air quality impact of the proposed project, that
impact, together with the baseline air quality levels, must be
compared to the Ambient Air Quality standards (AAQS). These
standards are the levels of air quality considered safe, to
protect the public health and welfare. They are designed to
protect people whose health makes them most susceptible to
respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very
young children, people weaken by disease or illness, and
persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise, whose are
deemed sensitive receptors. Healthy adults can tolerate
occasional exposure to air pollutant levels which exceed the
established standards.
The Clean Air Act Amendment of 1970 first established national
AAQS. states retained the option to adopt more stringent
standards or to include other pollution categories. The
initial attainment deadline of 1977 was extended to 1987 for
certain national standards, and that deadline passed with the
San Diego Air Basin (SDAB) still far from attainment. The
California Clean Air Act and a new Federal Clean Air Act have
been passed since then, both of which set forth more realistic
implementation time frames for airsheds with moderately
degraded air quality such as the SDAB. Because California
already had standards in existence prior to 1970 and because
of unique meteorological problems in California, there is
considerable difference between state and federal clean air
standards. The standards currently in effect in California
are shown in Table 1.
Air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air
quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is
determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air
basin. within the San Diego Air Basin, it has been calculated
that mobile sources are the major source of regional emissions
and are responsible for approximately 73 percent of the smog
emissions in San Diego county ("Climate and Smog in San Diego
County" , SDAPCD). Smog (comprised primarily of ozone)
concentrations in San Diego County exceed both federal and
state standards. In 1990 the federal standards was exceeded
on 39 days while the more stringent state standard was
exceeded on 139 days. In 1991, these days exceeding standards
fell to their lowest levels since expanded monitoring was
begun in the mid-1970's. The federal standard was exceeded on
26 days while the state standard was exceeded on 106 days.
While a combination of industrial and motor vehicle pollution
controls have provided a steady and significant improvement in
air quality, the dramatic improvements of 1991 are probably
Rev. (() 3,' 2 2/ 91 fPI/fr~t~~)
.t.:e--
/ <.
"'
/1 .,
, ,.-1. ~.; ';.;;'/
more due to favorable weather patterns than any air quality
improvement programs. In San Diego County, approximately 40%
of the state smog standard violations, three-fourths of the
federal violations, and all of the highest smog alert level
concentrations are caused by transported smog from the Los
Angeles area.
The air monitoring station closest to the project site,
operated by the SDAPCD, is on East "J" Street in Chula Vista.
The data collected at this station is considered to be
representative of the air quality experienced in the vicinity
of the project. Air quality data for 1987 through 1991 for
the Chula Vista station is provided in Table 2.
The air quality data indicate that ozone is the air pollutant
of primary concern in the project area, as well as San Diego
County as a whole. Ozone is a secondary pollutant; it is not
directly emitted. Ozone is the result of the chemical
reactions of other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons
and nitrogen dioxide, in the presence of bright sunlight.
Pollutants emitted from morning rush hour traffic react to
produce the oxidant concentrations experienced in Chula vista.
Ozone is the primary component of the photochemical oxidants
and it takes several hours for the photochemical process to
yield ozone levels which exceed the standard. All areas of
the San Diego County Air Basin contribute to the ozone levels
experienced at Chula Vista, with the more significant areas
being those directly upwind. The ozone levels at Chula vista
have not significantly increased or decreased over the last
six years.
Particulate matter (PM10) refers to suspended particulates
which are respirable. PM10 levels in the area are due to
natural sources, grading operations, and motor vehicles. The
federal standards for particulates have not been exceeded at
the Chula vista station since before 1982.
The carbon monoxide standards have not been exceeded over the
past several years, although no clear trend in maximum carbon
monoxide concentrations is evident. Carbon monoxide is
generally considered to be a local pollutant. That is, carbon
monoxide is directly emitted from several sources (most
notably motor vehicles), and the highest concentrations
experienced are directly adjacent to the source.
Lead and sulfur oxide levels are also well below state and
federal standards. Sulfur oxide levels are not exceeded
anywhere in the San Diego Air Basin, primarily because of the
lack of major industrial sources. Due to the introduction and
increased usage of unleaded gasoline, lead concentrations are
now well below the federal and state standards throughout the
basin.
Rev. (Q3 /22 /91~P:0!~0~~)
.::1::1,
/-~
~",,-= ,~/.-
'"- . 1 ~ //
~.:.~.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.=.:.:.:.:-:.:.:....:.:.:.:-:.:0:.:.:.:.:':0:.>>:.:.:0:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:0:.:-:.:0:-=-:-:':':.:.:':.:-:':.:.:.:.:':':':':0:.:':':,:,:':':0:.:':.:0:.:.:.:':.:.:':0:.:.>>:-:':-:':':-:-=-:':.:':':':':.:-:.:':.:.:.:.:':':0:-:':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':':'>>:-:.:.:.:.:-x.:.:-"'..:-:':.>>:.:':,:-:,:,:,:,:-:-:,:,:,:,:o:,:o:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:o:.:.:0:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:....:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:-:0:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:0:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:.>>:0:0:.:.
Table 2
Air Quality Levels Measured at Chula Vista
Ambient Air Monitoring station 1987-91
co
20 ppm
for 1 hr
35 ppm
for 1 hr
Days
Max. State/Fe:i. Std.
Year Level Exceeded
1987 0.17 15/2
1988 0.22 17/4
1989 0.16 21/7
1990 0.15 21/3
1991 0.15 13/3
1987 68 0/0
1988 58 0/0
1989 69 0/0
1990 67 0/0
1991 N/A 0/0
1987 0.04 0/0
1988 0.09 0/0
1989 0.08 0/0
1990 0.06 0/0
1991 0.07 0/0
1987 7.0 0/0
1988 7.0 0/0
1989 8.0 0/0
1990 7.0 0/0
1991 7.0 0/0
1987 0.15 0/0
1988 0.21 0/0
1989 0.16 0/0
1990 0.13 0/0
1991 0.12 0/0
Pollutant
CA std.
Fed. std.
Ozone
0.09 ppm*
for 1 hr.
0.12 ppm
for 1 hr.
Inhaleable
Particulate
(PM10)
50 IJg/m3
for 24 hr
150 IJg/m3
for 24 hr
S02
0.25 ppm
for 24 hr
0.5 ppm
for 24 hr
N02
0.25 ppm
for 1 hr
0.05 ppm
annual avg.
*ppm = parts per million
N/A = not available
SOURCE: Rancho del Rey Commercial Center Draft EIR (7/20/92)
';0;';';';';';';';-;';';';';';';';';0;';':';';-:';';';';';0;';';';';':';';';';';';';';0;';';';';':';0;0;';';';';0:0;';';';':';';0;';';';';';0;';';';':-:';':';0;':';';';';';0;';':0;';';';';';';';';';';0;':':';';';0;';';';';0;';';0;':';';':';';';';0;';';';':';':';';';';0;';';';';';0;':';0:-;-;';':':';';';';';';';0;';';':';';';';';';0;0;';';';0:.:';';';':0;';0;0;';';';':';';':';';';';';0;';';0;';';';';';';0;':';';0;';';';.;.;.;0;.;.;.;0;.;.;.;.;0;0;.;.;.;.:-;.;0;.;.;0;.;.;.;.;.;.;....:.;
Rev. (Q3,'22/94t~lt!!0~!)
~.
/ _ /) ,:'____ r- /
/ ~) ..-.</).Y
B. project Air Quality Impacts
Full development of projects within the EastLake Greens SPA
would generate approximately 39, 112~in::Q:~:~ daily automobile
trips. These trips would result in iriCie'ii"sed air emissions on
new and existing roadways. This includes trips assigned to
non-residential uses such as schools, commercial, and recre-
ation facilities. Short-term emissions from construction
activities would generate dust and diesel emissions resulting
in short-term emissions impacts.
1. Construction Impacts
soil disturbance to prepare the project site would generate
fugitive dust during the construction phase. Soil dust is
typically chemically inert and much of the dust is comprised
of large particles that are readily filtered by human breath-
ing passages and also settle out on nearby surfaces. It
comprises more of a potential soiling nuisance than an adverse
air quality impact.
Construction activities for large development projects are
estimated by the u.s. Environmental Protection Agency to add
1.2 tons of fugi ti ve dust per acre of soil per month of
activity. If water or other soil stabilizers are used to
control dust, the emissions can be reduced by up to 50
percent. However, fugitive dust control using water must be
balanced against the need to conserve water resources.
Currently, water conservation has taken priority. The
California ARB, in its development of area source emissions
calculations of fugitive construction dust, estimates that the
net disturbance area for single family homes is one-fourth
acre with a six month disturbance duration. Assuming the
entire EastLake Greens SPA will be graded and the average
duration will be six months, a total of 6,146 tons of dust
could be generated without application of dust control
procedures. Standard dust control utilizing reclaimed water
could reduce this by 50% to approximately 3,073 tons. The
respirable PM10 fraction of fresh construction dust is
estimated to be approximately one-third of TSP. Thus, the
project impact is probably about 1,024 tons over the multi-
year build-out period.
In addition to fugitive dust, construction activities would
also cause combustion emissions to be released from on-site
construction equipment and from off-site vehicles hauling
materials. Heavy duty equipment emissions are difficult to
quantify because of day-to-day variability in construction
activities and equipment used. Typical emission rates for a
diesel powered scraper are provided in Table 3, and were
obtained from the San Diego Air Oualitv Manaqement Division
Rev. ("3/22/9 4 +l"!l:P~t:~~) ~
/_ /1 ~----.. -.
, ..~ r;_/
Air Qualitv Handbook (April 1987). A diesel powered scraper
is the most common equipment used for grading operations.
-;';'..;0;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.,.:0;';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';':-;.;0;.;0;.;.;.;.;....;.;.;.;.;.;.;...;.;.;.:0;...;.;.;.;.;.;';0;0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';-;';';';';';-;';';';';0;';0;';';';';'..;0;';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';0;';0;0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';0;':-:0;';';0:0;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;0;.;.;.;.>>;.;....;0;.:-:.;0;...;.;...;0;.:-;
Table 3
Emission Rates for Grading scraper
POLLUTANT
EMISSION RATE (Grams/8 Hr.)
Carbon monoxide
Nitrogen oxides
Hydrocarbons
Sulfur oxides
Particulates
5,280
22,560
2,272
1,680
1,472
';';0:';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;-;';0;.;';';';';0;0;-;';.;';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';.;';';';';0;';';';';';';.;';';.;';';';';';_;';0;';';';';0;_;';';';';';.;';';';';0;';';';.;';0;';';0;';';';';';';';';0;';';0;';';0;';';';0;';';0;-;';0;.;':';';';';_;_;';0;';':';0;';';';';';';.;';';-;';';0;_;';0;_;';';0;';';0;';';,;,;';';';_;_;';o;.;.;.:o;-;.:~;v;.;o;o;-;.:.."*;o;
The emission rates above are provided in grams per 8-hour day.
To provide a regional perspective of construction emissions
generated by projects, the projected emissions for San Diego
County (Year 2000) have been provided for comparison. These
emissions are based on construction of planned land uses and
regional transportation facilities consistent with the input
data for the forthcoming Air Quality Plan, and are given in
units of tons/day (Table 4). [909,091 grams = 1 ton]
2. Mobile Source Impacts
Impacts to air quality result primarily from automobile
emissions. The proposed project would result in an increase
in air emissions. If future development has been anticipated
in the 1982 SIP then air quality impacts are considered
mitigated by adherence to the measures as outlined in the SIP.
The proposed project is consistent with SANDAG Series VII
projections, while the 1982 SIP is based on Series V projec-
tions. Typically, Series VII projections are higher than
Series V. Adherence to the policies and measures in the 1982
SIP may result in some residual impacts as not all growth has
been anticipated. However, the air quality planning process
now underway utilizes the Series VII projections and will
result in a new Air Quality Plan that will supersede the 1982
SIP. with adoption of the new plan, the project will be in
conformance with the regional air quality plan. This plan
will include increased standards and regulatory measures based
on the anticipated growth. Because the new plan includes the
project in its baseline information, project impacts would no
longer be considered significant.
Rev. (03 /22 /94J:P:t~~.t~R)
~2:0
/'.,
/\ / /,
.-:.-; ~( L-
:-:.:.~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:<<.:.~:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;-:-:a:-:-~;.;.:.:>:<-:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.~....:-:.:.:-:.:.=-:.>>:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.-..:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:.:.:-:.:.:.>>:-:.:.:.:~.....:.:.;....:->:.:.:.:-:.:....:.:-:.:6>;.>>:->>:-:.:.;.~-.:.:.:.:.:.:.~;.:.>:.:.:.:-:....~:a:.:-:.:.:.:-:':'~;~"X.:-:-;.;.:-:.:.:.:-;.:.~:-:.:-:.;<-:a:6>>:.:.>:.:.:-:.:.:-:a:-:.>:.:.
Table 4
San Diego Air Basin Emission Inventory summary
(tons/day)
(Preliminary Data)
SOURCES 1987 2000
Reactive Orqanic Gases (ROG)
Solvent Use 73.81 (27%) 106.63 (43%)
Other stationary Sources 27.54 (10%) 36.23 (15%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 107.10 (39%) 49.38 (20%)
Other On-road Vehicles 47.98 (18%) 29.86 (12%)
Other Mobile Sources 18.07 ( 6%) 24.70 (10%)
Total ROG 274.50 246.80
oxides of Nitroqen NOx
All stationary Sources 36.47 (15%) 55.97 (22%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 76.52 (31%) 41. 49 (16%)
Other On-road Vehicles 65.50 (26%) 64.92 (25%)
Ships 51. 98 (21% ) 71. 42 (28%)
other Mobile Sources 18.08 (7%) 24.15 (9%)
TOTAL NOx 248.55 257.94
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Fuel Combustion 46.03 (3%) 60.25 (6%)
Other stationary Sources 10.52 (1%) 13.22 (1%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 870.33 (61%) 519.66 (51%)
Other On-road Vehicles 402.64 (28%) 290.94 (29%)
Other Mobile Sources 97.08 (7%) 134.29 (9%)
TOTAL CO 1,426.60 1,018.37
Nitroqen Dioxide (NOJ-
Fuel Combustion 42.16 (17%) 63.55 (25%)
Other stationary Sources 1. 50 (1%) 2.00 (1%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 70.63 (29%) 38.43 (15%)
Other On-road Vehicles 57.30 (24%) 56.11 (22%)
Ships 52.83 (22%) 72.59 (28%)
Other Mobile Sources 17.59 (7%) 23.47 (9%)
Total N02 242.01 256.15
:.:.;.:.:...:.:.:.;.:.;...:.:.:.;.:.;.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.;-:.~:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.:.:...:.:.~;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.;.;-:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.:.;.:.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.;.;.:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.:.:.:.:-;-:.;.;.:....;.:.:.:.:.:.;-:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:-:-:.;.;.:-;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:-;.:....:.:.:.:.;.:.:-;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.~;.;.:.:.:.:.:.;.;.:.:.;.:6:.:.......:.:->;.:.~;.;.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.;.
Re v . (Q 3/22/ 91 trtf}1/!/l:~#c)
~.!
/
/
,;i G~/ /
Project air quality impacts from mobile sources were estimated
in the project EIR. These estimates have been reduced to
correspond with the total ADT reduction associated with the
decrease in residential units. Emissions associated with
build-out of the SPA are presented in Table 5. The figures
can be compared with the regional daily totals provided in
Table 4.
:.:.:.:.,.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:,:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:~:.=.:.:.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:6:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:-:.:o:.:-:.:o:.:.:o:.:-:o:.y.o:o:.:.:.:.
Table 5
Estimated Mobile Source project Emissions
proiect Emissions
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
6-o4-~f:~ tons / day
-l-.-GQ:~:~!Z
Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)
Sulfur Dioxide (502)
0.10
Hydrocarbons (HC)
~~:t:~:~
Total Suspended Particulate
Matter (T5P)
e-.-2-tHaHj~
';0;';':';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';':';';';';';';';';0;0;0;';';':-:';';':';0;';';';-:0;';';';';';';';';';';-;0;';';';.;.;.;.;.;.;-;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;.;.;.;.;-;.;.;.;.;.;.;-;.;.:';0;';';';';';';';-;';';':.;':.;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';.;';';';';';0;';';';';';';"';';';":';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';':';';';';';0;';';';';0;';';';';';';';';0;';0;';';';'..:0;';';';';';';';'..;0;';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';0;';';';0;';':0;';';';-;';';';';';';';';';';';':';0;';';';';';0;';';';0;';0;';
Localized air quality impacts can also result from vehicle
emissions. The volume of carbon monoxide released when a
large volume of slow moving vehicles are contained in one
small area can create air pollution "hot spots". Often such
"hot spots" can occur when intersection congestion is LOS ElF.
If traffic on Telegraph Canyon Road deteriorates to these
levels, potentially significant "hot spots" could result.
3. On-Site Impacts
Emissions from residential activity including painting,
household cleaning, fumigation, gasoline powered lawnmowers,
chemicals associated with swimming pools, wood burning
fireplaces and barbecues, while not considered significant,
would have a cumulative impact on regional air quality.
Emissions from the school and park sites including the use of
gasoline powered lawnmowers, chemicals associated with
maintenance activities and classroom activities are not
considered significant on a project level, but could have
cumulative impacts on regional air quality. within the South
Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area), regulations to prohibit or
restrict these types of air impacts are being adopted. If
similar regulations are adopted in the San Diego region, the
SDAPCD (or its designee) will enforce compliance, including
the subject project.
Rev. (03/22/91IPXP~1~~)
N-
,/'i 1.
-,,/ ( .;.' \
v. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES
The primary route to air quality mitigation and reduction of
project impacts to an insignificant level is conformance to the
adopted regional air quality plan. As discussed, the new Air
Quality Plan is now being prepared but specifics are unknown at
this time. To decrease project level emissions, the city of Chula
vista will adhere to recommendations made by the 1982 SIP and the
forthcoming San Diego Air Quality Plan regarding local participa-
tion in air emission reduction measures.
As is evident from the preceding discussion, the focus of local air
quality improvement measures are local sources (industrial uses)
and transportation behavior. The EastLake Greens SPA includes
primarily residential development. Residential development is not
a direct source of emissions. Thus, the project approach is to
provide alternative transportation routes, and in some cases
facilities, and encourage and/or educate residents to use them.
specific mitigation measures required of the project are described
in EIRs 81-03, 86-04, and IS 92-04 which are incorporated by
reference. Among these, measures to decrease proj ect-related
emissions include:
The project facilitates the use of alternative transportation
modes by promoting non-vehicular transit usage by project
residents by providing bicycle and pedestrian trails connect-
ing to all local activity centers (e.g., schools, parks,
etc.). All levels of schools (elementary to high school) are
planned wi thin the EastLake community. In addition, the
EastLake Activity Center is planned to include a variety of
retail and service commercial, entertainment and public
facility uses. Day care/church facilities and a full range of
public parks are included within the community to minimize
travel distance and encourage non-vehicular modes.
The land use plan for EastLake also includes a significant
business center to potentially reduce commute distances and
maintain an appropriate jobs/housing balance.
The location of the development projects is in close proximity
to existing and planned major transportation facilities:
Telegraph Canyon Road and SR-125. In addition, light rail
service is being planned to serve the community.
To avoid creation of air pollution "hot spots" at intersec-
tions, transportation phasing measures included in the Growth
Management Plan will be implemented to reduce potentially
significant impacts to air quality. Maintaining the LOS to C
or better will minimize the number of idling cars that are
releasing carbon monoxide into the air. The projects will be
required to comply with the threshold standards adopted by the
City which will maintain acceptable traffic flow. Fee
Rev. (CJ3/22/94tP,11!!0~a)
2::3:
//' /)
./j /, <,,7
;/ v.",
contributions by the projects will also help fund transporta-
tion system management improvements (signal synchronization,
etc. ) planned by the City and funded through development
impact fees.
To minimize air quality impacts from energy generation plants,
the project will incorporate energy conservation measures as
required by the state. Measures associated with reducing
energy for hot water heating will also contribute to water
conservation efforts.
As a component of the project water conservation program, an
on-going program of homeowner education/assistance will be
provided by the master developer (or designee). This program
can be expanded to include air quality issues; to provide
education and information to new homeowners who may be
receptive to changing their habits in conjunction with their
move to a new environment.
In addition, should new or more definitive measures be adopted
for residential development projects, either as a component of
the new regional Air Quality Plan or local regulations, these
measures will be incorporated into the projects. Because air
quality is an issue which can be effectively addressed only on
a regional (air basin) basis, the most effective approach will
be for each and every project to implement the Air Quality
Plan. EastLake Development Company is committed to implement-
ing this Plan and expects such provisions to be fully imple-
mented and/or enforced by the city of Chula vista.
Rev. (Q3/22/91~Pf~~t~~)
24
/. / . ?(, ~
VII. REFERENCES
California Air Resources Board; Answers to CommonlY Asked Ques-
tions About the California Clean Air Act's Attainment Plannina
Reauirements (CCAA Guidance Paper #1); August 1989.
California Air Resources Board; California Clean Air Act Trans-
portation Reauirements Guidance (CCAA Guidance Paper #2);
February 1990.
California Air Resources Board; Executive Summary - California
Clean Air Act Guidance on the Development of Indirect Source
Control proarams; July 1990.
cinti & Associates; EastLake Greens Draft SPA Plan; May 30, 1989.
1...l!"~;!!i~~EmW'i'~'I~
ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co.; EastLake Greens SPA
and EastLake Trails Pre-zone and Annexation Draft Supplemental
EIR; April 1989.
Giroux & Associates; Air Quality Improvement Plan - Telearaph
Canyon SPA; August 6, 1991.
Robert Bein, william Frost & Associates (RBF); Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report Rancho del Rey Commercial Center;
July 20, 1992.
SANDAG; 1991 Air Quality Plan Development Process (Aaenda Report
R-74); September 28, 1990.
SANDAG; Air Quality/Transportation Control Measure criteria
(Aaenda Report R-92); November 16, 1990.
SANDAG; Reaional Quality of Life Factors. Standards and Obiec-
tives (Aaenda Report RB-19)i November 16, 1990.
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; Memorandum:
Transportation Control Measure criteria; November 21, 1990.
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; California Clean
Air Act - Air Quality Strateay Development Workplan; n/d.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District; Guidelines for the
Preparation of Air Quality Impact Analyses; October 24, 1989.
willdan Associates and Bud Gray; Draft Growth Manaaement Pro-
gram - city of Chula vista; August 1990.
Rev. (03/22 / 9~i:gtf!~l~a)
.~
/', ,/ :::.--
/'<.. '"'" .._)
VI. MONITORING/CONCLUSION
A. Monitoring
To assure compliance with project mitigation measures, City
staff will require compliance with the forthcoming San Diego
Air Quality Plan. The City General Plan also includes
policies encouraging adherence to these measures. Prior to or
as a condition of approval of the tentative map, the project
design plan would be reviewed by the City Planning Department
to insure that there are adequate bicycle facilities on-site
(per PC District regulations), and that area(s} to accommodate
mass transit vehicles are reserved within the adjacent
EastLake I Village Center.
Transportation control systems and development/transportation
improvement phasing is also controlled by the City of Chula
vista through the forthcoming Growth Management Plan. These
measures will address the potential impacts associated with
congested traffic on Telegraph Canyon Road. The mitigation
measures included in the Transportation Phasing Plan will be
implemented before issuance of the occupancy permit per the
Public Facilities Finance Plan.
B. Conclusion/Analysis of significance
Development of the projects will result in increased traffic
on new and existing roadways and additional air emissions.
Fugitive dust released from construction a short-term nuisance
and would not constitute a significant impact. The develop-
ment of the proposed project is consistent with SANDAG Series
VII projections and not the Series V projections associated
with the 1982 SIP which is considered a significant impact.
The SIP revision, which is currently being initiated using
Series VII projections will be completed and adopted prior to
build-out. The project will be in compliance with the
provisions of the new Air Quality Plan and impacts are
expected to be minimized. compliance with the air quality
plan would define project impacts as less than significant.
Rev. ((;}3,'22,'91~Pl:!~0~~)
2;5.
;{.,:;/ <~;'
ctrilccout/RglJi.:J.i.fi:i version
......................... .
...........................
-WATER CONSERVATION PLAN-
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA
SUBMITTAL DRAFT
October 27, 1992
Revised 7112/94~fjlfjlfA
Approved by City Council Resolution No. _
-Date-
Prepared for:
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100
Chula Vista, CA 91914
Prepared by:
JAY KNIEP LAND PLANNING
(916) 541-1817
/,
Table of Contents
Paqe
I . INTRODUCTION / SUMMARY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
A. Purpose
B. Approach
C. Goals
D. Conservation Estimates
E. Roles and Responsibilities
II. WATER CONSUMPTION................................. 6
III. WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES....................... 8
A. Available On-site Conservation Measures
B. Conservation Measures Implemented
C. Projected Water Savings
D. Off-site Conservation Measures
IV. IMPLEMENTATION/MONITORING......................... 18
V. REFERENCES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19
.1
/ -.'
, !
I.
Executive summary
..
l
A. purpose
.
The purpose of this Water Conservation Plan for development
within the EastLake Greens sectional Planning Area (SPA) is to
respond to the Growth Management policies of the City of Chula
vista. The water conservation measures presented in this plan
are intended to respond to the long term need to conserve
water in new development; more stringent short-term, emergency
measures (e.g., water rationing, new meter moratorium, etc.)
responding to drought or water crisis situations are not
included. This plan is intended to be implemented over the
life of the project and to establish standards which will be
acceptable to future project residents regardless of water
availability.
B. Approach
The approach to water conservation outlined in this plan is
intended to be comprehensive and implemented throughout the
life of the development project. Water conservation during
construction and after occupancy are addressed, as well as the
installation of water conserving landscaping, appliances and
fixtures. Efforts to educate and increase awareness of the
need to conserve water and the opportunities to do so, will be
directed toward future residents. Project participation in
regional or city-wide water conservation/mitigation programs
to provide additional off-site mitigation is also anticipated.
C. Goals
The following are goals of the EastLake Greens SPA Water
conservation program:
1. To conserve water during and after construction of the
projects within the EastLake Greens SPA.
2. To comply with the water conservation standards and
policies of the city of Chula vista and otay Water
District.
3. To create a comprehensive framework for the design,
implementation and maintenance of water conserving
measures, both indoor and outdoor.
4. To be economically efficient and cost effective.
D. Conservation Estimates
As detailed in this report, numerous features have been
included in the project and commitments made by the Master
Developer to minimize the use of water during the construction
(Rev. (7/12 / 91~~l!t~t!~)
~
--',
and habitation of development within the EastLake Greens SPA.
The estimated water consumption statistics, with and without
conservation measures are outlined in the Table 1.
:.;.;.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.>:.:.:.:.:.>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:':o!-:':.>:.:':.:.:O:.>:O:.>:':.:.>:':.:':b:':.:.:.~.:.
Table 1
EastLake Greens SPA
Water consumption/Conservation Summary
Water Consumption
wlo Conserve wi Conserve
Percent
Savinqs
Residential
1.09 lICO'" 0.66 UCO 40'fs
....... ........... ......................................................... ..........
Q~~:~ :~~m3:H~Q~~~9::~(i~t:}:........ ..,,:,:,,'~~:~
Commercial/
Public & Quasi-public
Schools/Parks
O.~$~ MGO
o . ~~.~;}. MGO
0.68 MGO
o . G&~:J; MG01
0.06 MG02
10%
7G!%
74%
Golf course/Landscape
O. 18 MG02
TOTALS
2.06 KOD 0.98 KeD
tt~,~:::.~.t.ii....:~:,~:~:!~.QQ::
.......... ............
...........................
...........................
.......................... .
...........................
...........................
. ....................
48\
I'~
'MOD = million gallons/day
1 Savings based on using efficient irrigation and drought tolerant landscaping.
2 Savings based on using reclaimed water for irrigation.
.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;';,;,;';';';0;';-;';';0;';0;';';';';';0;0;';';';';';';';';''':';';';';';';';-;';0;';';-;';-;.;0;';.;0;0;-;-;';.;-:;0;.;-;0;
The water savings summarized above reflect the implementation
of several water conservation measures essentially within the
EastLake Greens SPA boundary. These measures are summarized
in Table 2. In addition, the project is committed to fully
participate in any off-site mitigation program adopted by the
city. Such a program could be designed to require new
development to off-set all or a portion of their new water
demand by funding or providing water conservation improvements
in older developed areas where efficient plumbing fixtures or
irrigation systems were not installed. Funds collected could
also be spent on studying or acquiring new or improved sources
of water (e.g., expanded water reclamation, desalination,
etc.). Although such a program does not exist at the current
time, considerable work is being completed by several agencies
including the CWA, local water districts, and the city to
formulate such a plan and adoption of a region-wide program is
anticipated at a future date.
( Rev. 7" 12 / 91~:tf0~~K~?)
2
/
j
:;/ ,;-:: , )
>-,.' /
:.:.;.:.~.:.:o~.:.~.~.~.:.:.:.;.:.~.~.:.:o:o=.y.<<.:o~.:.~.:o:.:-:.~.~.=-=.=-:.:':6:.:.:-:.:.=-='=-='~-:':':-:'=':-:':O=-:':':':':':O>>Y.-:':'~-:':':':Q=-:':':-:':'~-:'=-:':':':':':'~-:':':':'Y.':':':-:'=-=-:.:.:.:.:o~.:.~.:o:.:.:o:.:.=-:.:.Y.o:o~,:,y.,:,:-:.:'~':<<6:':.~':':-:.."~.~.:'>>:>~<<-'V.->>=6:-:':':'>>~:Q:-:':'='~':':':':':':'>>:':-:':':-:':':'~-:':'=-:.:.:.=-:.:.:.:.:.:-:........~-:....:.:....~-:-:.:.:Q:.:-:.:.:.:.=-:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.
Table 2
EastLake Greens SPA
Water conservation Measures
On-site Measures
Fixtures/Devices
Ultra-low Flow Toilet
Ultra-low Flow Shower Head
Faucet Aerator
Hot Water Pipe Insulation
Pressure Reducing Valves
Water Efficient Dishwasher
Water Efficient Clothes Washer (advise/assist)
outdoors/Landscaping
Efficient Irrigation for Common Areas and Slopes
Low Water Use Demonstration Model Home Landscaping
Installation of Reclaimed Water Mains
Water Conserving Practices during Grading/Construction
Public Education/Awareness Program
Homebuyer Information Packets
Water Conservation Coordinator
Public Information seminars
Off-site Measures
The applicant shall comply with a City-approved water use offset policy,
in which one or more of the following off-site measures may be required:
1. Compliance with a regional water use offset program, to be admin-
istered by the San Diego County Water Authority.
2. Compliance with a locally administered water use offset program
(such program may be administered by the city, water district, or a
combination of both).
3. Implementation of specific water use offset measures for this
project, if neither a regional or locally administered water use
offset program is in place prior to issuance of building permits for
any portion of this project.
In the event that a City-approved water offset policy is not in effect at
the time building permits are issued, the requirements of this plan shall
be met through implementation of specific water offset measures for this
project, with the level of offsets and specific measures to be approved by
the city.
;';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';0;';0;';';.;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;';0;';';';';';.;';.;.;';';';';';';.;';.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;0;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;0;';';0;0;';';';.;';';';';';';.;';';0;0;';';';.;';';';0;0;';';';.;';';';';';';';';';';';9;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;';.;0;0;';';';';';9;0;';';';';';';';';0;';';';0;';0;0;';0;0;';';';':9;>:';';';';';>:';0;0;.;0;';';';';0;';';';';.0;0;';';0;';';0;0;.;0;';';':';';';.;.;....:.;.;0;.;.;0;.....;0;.;0;0;.;.;.;0;.;0;.;.;.;.;.;.;0;0;.;.;.
(Rev. (7/12" 91fqZ~:~t~!)
'~.
/,
~'
E. Roles and Responsibilities
In order for this plan to be effective, it is necessary to
clearly assign appropriate roles and responsibilities to all
of the participants in the development and occupancy phases of
projects within the EastLake Greens SPA. There are three
primary groups involved: developer/builders; government/ser-
vice agencies; future residents and commercial property
owners/tenants. Each has an important role to play, as
described below.
1. Developer/Builders
The master developer, EastLake Development Company, is
providing the basic planning, design, and management of
this program. Community level facilities, landscaping
and construction standards will be designed and imple-
mented by the master developer.
Individual builders will construct homes according to the
standards set by the master developer (and the City) and
will be responsible for water planning and management
within their own project. Builders will also be the
primary communicators with homebuyers. In this role, they
will be responsible for identifying the water conserva-
tion features incorporated in the project, and educating
home buyers regarding a continuing conservation effort.
The builder/developer will also comply with any city-wide
or regional water supply mitigation or improvement
program, if such a program is adopted.
2. Property Owners/Residents/Tenants
The long term success of the conservation effort rests
with property owners who are the long term water users
within the project. Private homeowners, associations,
and public agencies will be responsible for irrigation
and landscape materials on individual lots. Builders
will incorporate water conserving systems and materials
with initial construction but it will be the responsi-
bility of the property owner/tenant to maintain these
installations and use water responsibly on a day-to-day
basis.
Land uses which have significant irrigation requirements
(i . e., golf course, schools, parks, landscaped open
space) should utilize reclaimed water when it is avail-
able. The decision to utilize reclaimed water will rest
with property owners, which are public agencies (school
district and city) in most cases.
(Rev.(7/12/94~P0~~t~~)
A=-
/-.
/j./ 11"'"1
, .,.I
3. Government/Service Aqencies
The city of Chula vista will review project plans and
assist in the monitoring of this plan. Because of its
development approval role, the City can effectively
enforce water conservation standards for new construc-
tion. The City can also be a source of on-going educa-
tion and water awareness through citizen communication
programs.
The City, through the Interagency Water commission, will
also have a role in formulating and implementing a city-
wide or regional water conservation/mitigation program.
The otay Water District will provide domestic water
service and reclaimed water service. As the water
purveyor, the District may adopt its own guidelines or
standards for water conservation. The District now has
a water connection allocation program in effect. The
District will also monitor adherence to policies or
requirements of regional water agencies such as the
County Water Authority and the Regional Water Quality
Control Board.
As owners of property with significant irrigation needs,
the city, Chula vista Elementary School District and
Sweetwater Union High School District will have the
opportunity to utilize reclaimed water, when it is
available.
(Rev.(7/12/91~~t!!t!~)
.s:-
// ft.',
/1 " ; //
.......,
II. WATER CONSUMPTION
This section presents information on the anticipated water demand
of development within the EastLake Greens SPA. Information from
the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project has
been utilized with some modification to reflect the project lias
approved. II The EIR addressed a project totaling 3,609 residential
units while the revised consists of 2,871~t:,~?ia:a units.
...........:.;.;.:-....:.:.:-:.;.:-:
Table 4 shows the projected water use within the EastLake Greens
SPA, based on average use rates which do not reflect significant
conservation measures, categorized according to land use and
residential density based on the population estimates given in
Table 3. The primary unit of measure for water quantity used for
comparison in this report is gallons per capita per day (gpcpd).
This can be multiplied by the estimated number of persons per
dwelling unit (DU) to obtain the gallons per day per dwelling unit.
The number of persons per dwelling unit varies with the type of
unit (single family detached, attached, apartment, etc.), as shown
in Table 3.
The total projected average water use, without conservation
measures, for projects within the EastLake Greens SPA is ~li~.'$
million gallons per day (MGD). The ability to use reclaimed water
to irrigate large areas within the EastLake Greens SPA is being
built into the project, and is addressed separately, as it is not
directly a part of . the residential development. Approximately
0.641: MGD (31'lsH($4:~) of the total water need could be satisfied by
using reclaimed'wafer. The focus of this report is to describe
conservation measures for reducing the proj ected hMg~~~g: MGD
potable water use within the residential development. .......
;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;,;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.:.;.;.;_;.;.;.;_;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';-;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;';';-;';';';';';-;-;';-;';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;-;';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';0;0;';';';';';';';';0;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;-;.;.;.;.;.;0;.;.;.;0;';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';0;0;-;';';';0
Table 3
EastLake Greens SPA Estimated population
Proposed
Units
(Dll)
Household
Size
population
Attached Med. Density
276
iWjoa
.... .............
2.5
7'H7~?
,~!::f:!:R
690
:3.4!:?'~i$:
Single Family Detached
~jj~,~
...................
3.0
TOTALS
~~:;~i,:jH..~..~..
H. H. H. H 3.H~HC} H.( .~~?9.'~H t. H'H ...
...::!~.~~i,:~(I.:~)::::~~:~:,',.".~~;:~.:.i!~i
:.:.:.:.:.:.:':.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:._.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:0:':':-:':':':':':':':':':-:':':':':':':':.:-:-:-:<<.:.:.:.:.:.:0:0:.:.:0:....
( Rev. 7 / 12191~:l(0~~r~~)
.~
// .1':/7,'/'
'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,,:.:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:>:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Table 4
Projected Water Use in EastLake Greens SPA
Land Use
Residential
Single Family Detached
Attached Medium Density
Sub-total
Commercial/
Public Quasi-public
High School:
Potable
Irrigation
Elem. School: Potable
Irrigation
Open Space OS-6 & OS-7
Other
Parks
Golf Course
Fairways
Slopes
Clubhouse
Population/Units
7,785 persons
I;g~i
uUE;~rO persons
3g.~~?
~;:~~~ persons
~ acres
47Ht
~r~4"<)O students
17 acres
600 students
5 acres
11 acres
46 acres
U ac (net)
:37
130 acres
30 acres
Water Use
Rate (MGD)
130 gpcpd ~
g~::lj
110 gpcpdO':'mr
bUijS
2,500 gpapd
20 gpcpd
3.0 ft/yr
15 gpcpd
3.0 ft/yr
2.0 ft/yr
2.0 ft/yr
3.0 ft/yr
3.5 ft/yr
2.5 ft/yr
~
OW:92
-e.-e.9-
bUtt!
0:05
0.05*
0.01
0.01*
0.02*
0.08
~*
'Oltlft
"tL'41*
0.07*
0.10
Total Permanent Potable Use
Total Potential Reclaimed Use
Total Water Use
~
::r,~,'2S
0.641*
h-&6-
,fBI:$
Average per capita use ~ ill: gal/day
gpapd = gallons per acre per day
gpcpd = gallons per capita per day
MGD = million gallons per day
*Areas with potential to be irrigated with reclaimed water.
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.'.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:>:.:.:>:.:.:>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:>:.:-:.:.:.:-:>:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:>:.:.:-:>:.:.:>:.:.:.:>:.:-:>:.:.:.:.:.:>:':':>:,:':':'
(Rev. 7/12 / 9{~at~~t~?)
.~
"', /7 .'
," / -;
III. Water Conservation Measures
Three consecutive years of drought in watersheds supplying San
Diego County have lead to changing attitudes and governmental
policies regarding water. continued water shortfalls are projected
as growth continues in Southern California. Three possible
solutions are available: increase water supply from non-tradition-
al sources; conserve available water; or, increase production and
use of reclaimed water. The conservation approach is the focus of
this report, primarily because it is a cost effective approach
which can be directly implemented on a project-by-project basis.
Over the long-term, water conservation must become an integral
component of the Southern California way of life with or without a
drought condition in order to avoid drastic lifestyle alterations.
The potential impact of water conservation can be see in Table 5.
A. Available On-site Conservation Measures
Several general approaches to water conservation are avail-
able: demand reduction; increased efficiency; increased
supply/reclaimed water use; and, improved water system
management. The measures included in this report are limited
to those which can be implemented in development projects of
the size and type found in the EastLake Greens SPA.
1. Public Information
Any voluntary or mandatory water conservation effort
requires cooperation of the public. Most consumers have
very little knowledge of the water system that serves
them. Historically, water has been inexpensive in
California; therefore, people have a tendency to assume
that there is an abundant supply and take it for granted.
The purpose of public education is to inform and convince
the consumer that a change in personal water habits is
essential and is in his/her own and the community's best
interest. Generally, long term results are best achieved
through educating children in water conservation.
2. Land Use
The per capita and per dwelling unit water use quantity
changes with the type of residential units, the value of
the residence, and the size of the lot. Table 5 shows
typical per capita use for a single family detached
residence in coastal Southern California. Interior per
capita use is similar to other types of residences; the
major difference in use is with outside use, which is
significantly lower for high density developments such as
apartments and condominiums. Table 5 also shows the
potential savings for each of the water use areas.
(Rev. (7 / 12/91+:~t~~Z~~)
.so
j
_'? .',./r:..
y":,:,>>",,,>:~.=-:,~.=.=-~,:,=.:,:->>~~.=-:.~~.:.~~.>>~~~,:,~-:-:>:~-:,~,:,=-:,~~.:.:<<o:~.=-~.:~~.=-=-:.!o!o:.:.=-!o!o=-:.~o:.:o:.=....~.~=-:.=.=-x.!o:"",,,:,:.:.:o:.:,:~.)>>:.~~,:.:~-=->>=.~,:,=.:,:,x<<->>=-~.:,:,:,y.,:.:,:.=-=.~-=-~~,:,:,>>~~.:-~~Q.~!oY.-:-,-,:,:,~",-,,:,:<<<<.:<<-:,:,:,~~~,,":.=.:.:.:....!o>>:-=-:.:.=-)))~~.:.:.:~.=.:.~.=.:.:.:.=-)~-=.=-=.:.~.~O>>:->>~:.:.:.:.:.~~-.:-:.
Table 5
Residential Water Use in Southern California
Inside Use
Typical Use
(gpcpd)
Use w/
Conservation
Measures
(gpcpd)
Potential
Water Savings
(gpcpd) %
Toilet
Bath/Shower
Laundry
Dishwashing
Faucet
cooking
Total Inside
outside Use
Landscape
Car Washing,
etc.
Total outside
TOTAL USE
30.0 20.0 10.0 33
22.0 17.0 5.0 23
10.0 8.5 1.5 15
4.0 3.0 1.0 25
3.0 2.5 0.5 17
~ ~ ~ ~
72.0 54.0 18.0 25%
53.0
28.0
25.0
47
~
~
~
~
47%
58.0
33.0
25.0
130.0
87.0
43.0
33%
Total Savings:
Single Family Detached -
129 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 3.0 Capita
Per DU
Attached Low Density
108 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 2.5 Capita
Per DU
Attached High Density
86 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 2.0 Capita Per
DU
Source: Luke- Dudek Engineers
NOTE: Total savings without consideration of reclamation.
.;';';';.;';.;.;.;';.;.;';';0;';';';';';';';';';.;';0;';';';';';';';';';';';.;';';';.;';.;';.;';.;';';-:-;';0;';';';';';';.;';';';';0;';';0;';';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';0;.;';';';.;0;';0;';';0;';';';';';';';';';0;';';';';';0;';.;';.;.;.;0;0;0;....;.;.;.;.;0;.;.;.;.;.;0;.;.;0;.;0;.;0;.;.;.;.;.;.;.;0;0;.;0;.;.;0;0;.;0;0;0;0;0;.;0;0;.;0;.;.;0;0;....;0;-:-;0;-:-;.;0;.;.;.;.;0;0;.;0;';-:.;0;';';0;';.;0;0;0;0;0;0;';';';';';';';-:';0;0;';';';0;.;0;0;0;0;..-0;0;.;0;.;0-..;.;....;.;.;0;0;.;0;0;.;
(Rev. (7/12 / 91f~rP;~li!~)
~
/; /
~ v'
3. Mechanical Measures
Numerous mechanical devices to reduce household water
consumption are available, especially for interior use.
As Table 5 indicates, about half the water used in
California is used indoors.
The bathroom is where most inside water is used and
wasted daily. Conventional toilets use from 5 to 7
gallons per flush, as opposed to low-flush toilets, which
use from 3.3 to 1. 5 gallons per flush. Since 1978,
California has required that all new toilets installed
use no more than 3.5 gallons per flush.
Ultra low flush toilets, which have recently been
developed, use about 1.5 gallons per flush. This is a
reduction of about 57% from the low flush toilets used in
new homes, and a reduction of up to 70% from the older
toilets. Since the toilet accounts for about 40% of the
indoor use, this presents a significant opportunity for
reduction.
Standard shower heads have a flow rate of about 4.5
gallons per minute (gpm). California requires that new
shower heads have a flow of no more than 2.75 gpm. The
most water conservative showerheads have a flow rate of
0.5 gpm using a blend of air and water to give the
illusion of a higher flow rate. In addition to saving
water, low flow showerheads also save energy by reducing
the amount of hot water used. Hot water use is the
second largest residential energy consumer; heating and
air conditioning the home is the greatest residential
use. Low flow faucets reduce flow rates from about 5 gpm
to between 2.75 gpm and 0.5 gpm; this can save one gallon
per person per day.
Low water-use appliances can also be large contributors
to water conservation. certain models of dishwashers use
50% less water than others and can thus save between 7
and 9 gallons per load. Clothes washers use 41 to 74
gallons per load. Front loading washers are more
efficient than top loading, and various options can save
even more water. Water level controls and washers that
recycle rinse water save about 1.5 gallons per person per
day. Table 6 shows potential water use reduction due to
water saving devices installed in an average home.
( Rev. (7/12,' 91~~Zfl~t~~)
~
')
..:.:.:.:_:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0=.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:o:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-=-:.:.:o!>:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:0:.:.:.:0=.:-:.:<<.:.:.=-:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:<<.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:o!>:.:.:.:.....:-:.:.:.=-:.:.:.:-:-:-=-:.:.:-,.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.....:-:o=.:<<.:-:~.<<O:'>>:.:'*:'*:..."o.Y..:-=-:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:..-.:.>>:.:-:-:-:.:<<.:.~:.=.:.:.:<<.:-:.:.:-:.:-:y:-:-.-.:0>>:-:.:.:-:<<<<....:->>>>:.
Table 6
summary of Typical Household water-savinq Devices
Device
Water Use Reduction
gpd percent
12-27
0- 1
0-12
0-20
0- 5
0- 4
1- 4
Toilet improvements
Faucet aerators
Shower flow limiting
Pressure-reducing valves
Improved clothes washers
Improved dishwashers
Hot water pipe insulation
7.5-17.5
0- 0.5
0- 7.5
0-16.0
0- 8.0
0- 8.0
0- 8.0
Approximate Total
35.0 gpd
25%
Source; Water Conservation Strategies, AWWA, 1980.
0;';';';-;-;';';';';';';';';';';-;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';-;';';';';';0;';';';';';';';';-;';';';';0;';';';';';';';';';0;';0;';';';';';';';';';';';';';';';0;';-;';,;,;,;,;';0;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;';-;';';0;0;';';';_;';';';0;';';0:-:';0;';';';';0;';';';0;';0;';';0;';';';';';';.;.;o;.;.;o;v;-;o;.;.;o;.;o;.;.;-;.;.;v;.;.;.;.;.;.>>;.;.;.;o;.;.;.;';';';0;';';':"";';';';';0;';';';0:,,';';0;0;';';';';';';';';';';.;-;0;.;.;-;...;0.;0;..;.;.....;0;.;.;.;.....;0;.;
4. Landscape
Approximately 50% of water used in California is for
landscapes. Typical landscape efficiencies are between
50% and 80%; therefor, savings of 20% - 50% are possible
through better watering techniques and maintenance.
TriCkle/drip irrigation applies water exactly where it is
needed at an efficiency of 85% - 90%, and results in a
total water savings of more than 4% alone. Generally,
sprinklers are between 60 and 75% efficient. Watering at
night, or in the early morning, using automatic sprinkler
systems can save 20% of outside water. Daytime irriga-
tion is inefficient because much water is lost to
evaporation. Through the use of drought tolerant plants,
water consumption can be reduced by 40% to 60%.
Moisture sensors are another way to increase irrigation
efficiencies. Residential customers, on the average,
over water their landscaping by about 20% while parks and
recreational areas are over watered by nearly 80%.
Moisture sensors are not considered economical for
residential use, but would save millions of gallons of
water and thousands of dollars each year if used for
parks and recreational areas. Polymers and wetting
agents in the soil can also increase irrigation efficien-
cy.
(Rev. (7/12/9fl~'ZP!t~~)
II
'I
B. conservation Measures Implemented
Implementing water conservation measures before a project is
constructed provides an opportunity to include measures which
might not otherwise be practical. Many of the measures
described here could be prohibitively expensive to retro-fit
to existing residences, but can be cost effective if included
with the initial construction. In addition, moving in to a
new home provides a major opportunity to change habits and
attitudes while adjusting to the new home/environment.
The potential water savings for each of the conservation
measures which have been and will continue to be implemented
in development within the EastLake Greens SPA are shown in
Table 7 in units of gallons per capita per day (gpcpd), and
can be multiplied by the number of people per dwelling unit
(DU) to determine the water savings for each household. Water
savings are relati ve to other newer homes without water
conservation devices; much higher water savings can be shown
if the proposed measures are compared to older residential
units.
1. Fixtures/Devices - Indoors
Ultra-Low Flow Toilet - The ultra low flow toilet uses
1.6 gallons per flush, compared to the current require-
ment of 3.5 gal/flush, or the older standard of 5 to 7
gal/flush. Since the toilet is the largest single inside
use of water (40%), large savings can be realized by
using the ultra-low flow toilets.
Ultra-Low Flow Shower Head - The ultra-low flow shower
head reduces the f low from the current standard of 3. 5 to
2 gpm. Older shower heads flow from 3 to 5 gpm. The
ultra-low flow shower head saves about 5 gpcpd for a
minimal extra cost of approximately $3.00.
Faucet Aerator - Faucet aerators give the appearance and
feel of greater flow, so less water is used. Many new
homes already come with aerators, so the actual savings
is shown ranging from 0 to 0.5 gpcpd. Although the
savings is small, the additional cost is low, so their
use is economical. There is also potential savings in
energy through reduced use of hot water.
Hot Water pipe Insulation - By insulating the hot water
pipes and separating the hot and cold lines to reduce
heat exchange, the time the faucet is allowed to flow
while waiting for the water to become hot is reduced.
The cost for insulating the pipes exceeds the value of
water saved, but the cost is relatively low, and it is
simple to do while the unit is under construction. The
potential energy savings with insulation can be signifi-
cant.
(Rev. (7/12/ 9 ~~rI/131'#//;~~) 12.
/', / /7
Pressure Reducinq Valve - A pressure reducing valve at
the water hook-up for each residence can reduce the flow
rate by reducing the pressure in the lines. Normal
pressures for residential use range from 40 to 80 psi;
the optimum is a range of 50 to 60 psi allowing a normal
flow of 3 gpm. The amount of potential savings depends
on the line pressure available, and ranges from 0 to 3
gpcpd.
Water Efficient Dishwasher - New water efficient dish-
washers can save as much as 6 gallons per cycle over
older models. Newer models tend to be more eff icient, so
the actual amount of water saved will depend on the type
of dishwasher proposed.
Water Efficient Clothes Washers The relationship
between water efficiency and cost of the appliance for
the clothes washer is the same as with the dishwasher.
Since the clothes washer uses more water, the potential
savings is greater. The major difference with the
clothes washer is that it is normally supplied by the
owner, and would therefore be difficult to mandate the
use of more efficient and costly machines, especially
since the cost increase exceeds the value of the water
saved. Home builders will advise and assist homeowners
in their selection of an efficient machine.
2. Outdoors/Landscaoinq
Efficient Irriqation System - As much as 50% of total
water use is outside the home for a single family
detached residence with large turf areas. Most residen-
tial landscaping is over-watered, so the potential
savings with efficient, timed sprinklers and micro
irrigation systems is very large. All builder installed
common area/slope irrigation within the EastLake Greens
SPA will be water efficient. Drip irrigation systems
will be utilized where appropriate. The master developer
requires each home builder to provide a low water use
landscaping example within each model complex to demon-
strate the concept and methods water conservation in
landscaping to prospective homebuyers. This is one
component of an education program intended to encourage
homeowners to install efficient irrigation systems and
drought tolerant plant material in their own homes. A
Homeowner's Guide to Drought Tolerant Landscape is also
distributed to all new home buyers to provide information
on irrigation systems and low water use landscaping.
Low Water Use Landscaoinq - The largest potential for
reducing outside water use is to decrease the water
demand by using low-water use, drought-tolerant landscap-
ing. Turf areas require large amounts of water, so
restricting the area of turf will have a significant
( Rev. (7,' 12 / 91~~i'!l~r~\?)
g;.
/.
.( /
impact. As noted above, builders are required to provide
examples of front yards which have reduced turf areas and
utilize drought-tolerant plant materials. A Homeowner's
Guide to Drought Tolerant Landscape will be distributed
to all new home buyers to educate and encourage similar
homeowner installed landscape design and materials.
3. Education
General Water Conservation - In addition to the physical
measures to reduce water consumption, a general water
conservation program will enforced to reduce waste.
Guidelines and educational materials will be distributed
to all new homeowners. Water waste may be monitored by
the homeowners' association(s), where available.
4. Reclaimed Water
Water Reclamation - Water reclamation conserves large
amounts of potable water used for irrigation. The major
opportunities for irrigation with reclaimed water are the
golf course, parks, large open space areas, and the field
area of the schools. Reclaimed water mains have been
installed to deliver water to these sites from the water
reclamation plant operated by the otay Water District.
The decision to utilize reclaimed water will lie with the
respecti ve property owners f the city of Chula vista,
school districts, and golf course operator. Reclaimed
water is currently being utilized to irrigate the golf
course. In addition, the amount and timing of irrigation
is controlled by a computerized "weather station" which
determines the appropriate amount of water based on
current climatic conditions. The use of reclaimed water
on the golf course alone provides a ~g~l.: savings of
potable water. The use of reclaimed..water on all
potential sites could result in a ~~:I~ reduction in
potable water use in the EastLake Greerii=~PA (see Table
4) .
5. Water Use Durinq Construction
Water conservation measures can also be implemented
during the construction/grading process. The three
primary uses are: dust abatement; soil compaction; and,
street washing. since the imposition of stage 2 water
conservation requirements by the otay Water District,
water conservation has been incorporated in EastLake
construction activities, as appropriate. Water use has
been limited to that necessary for proper soil compac-
tion; soiled streets have been swept instead of washed.
Reclaimed water could be used for these grading activi-
ties, when it is available.
(Rev. (7 / 12/91~!l0egt~\f)
.~"
,,/ t"/
./ <
, ,j
The use of native/naturalized plant materials on graded
slopes in open space will reduce the need for irrigation
in the future. Open space slopes within the EastLake
Greens SPA are or will be planted with drought tolerant
plant materials to reduce the need for irrigation and
maintenance.
c. projected Water savings
As indicated in Table 7, a total water savings of 0.431 :q:@i~*
MGD or approximately +e%j.g:1 of residential water us.i......Ts.
projected with full implementation of the water conservation
measures specified in this plan.
(Rev. (7/12 / 91t:~0q;!t!!)
15.-
.; (~./~
,;7"" J-;:./
'.~.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~.:-:~.:.:.:.:.:.~.:.:.:.~,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,~,:,:,:,:,:,:,:,:"':':':':':':':':':':.:.:-:.:.:.:.:-:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.,.,.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:-:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:.>>:.:.:.:.:-:.~~-:.:.:.:.:.
Conservation
Measure
Table 7
EastLake Greens SPA
Water conservation Xeasures
Function
WATER SAVINGS
Per
capita
(gpcpd)
Per
Residence
(gpd/DU)
For Project
(MGD)
Inside
Ultra-low flow
Toilet; 1. 6
gal/flush
Ultra-low flow
shower head; 2 GPM
Faucet Aerator
Hot Water Pipe
Insulation
Water Hook-up
Pressure Reducing
Valve
Water Efficient
Dishwasher
Water Efficient
Clothes Washer
Outside
Efficient
Sprinklers & Drip
Irrigation
Low Water Use
Landscaping
General
Conservation
Subtotal
Water Reclamation
Reduced Flush
Volume
Reduced Shower
Flow Rate
Appearance and
Feel of Greater
Flow
Reduces Warm-Up
Time
Reduces Pressure
and Flow Rate
Reduced Water
Requirement
Reduced Water
Requirements
Increased
Irrigation
Efficiency
Low Water Demand
Reduce Waste
Replace Potable
Irrigation Water
10
~
PiP?!
~
i.a
5
G,-G42.
OXbjj
14
0-0.5
0.004
1
o-~
G-rGH
bmh~
5
0-1
~
9)Qi~
8
0-1
0.008
3
0-1. 5
~
~h91:!
4
10
~
tnoi6
~
~.~
15
~
tftl1:!
~
9)9?~
44
41
O-J
8
~
9,!'1
~
P:t~:,q
PROJECT TOTALS 51 ~ -l-4+
....,.,.,.,.,.,...,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.y.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.".,.".,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,."."...,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.".,.,.,.,.".",.",.,.,.,.".".;.;.=".",.;.,.".;.,.;.;.",.",."."."~".;."~",,,,.;.;.,.:I::~.g~!:l,,,,.,,,.,,,.,,,~,,,,<<~,,.,,.,,.;.,,,,.,,;l:!I;.;.:~,,.,,.,,.,,.,,.:,"".",
(Rev. 7 / 12/9{~!lq~t~?)
J;:6""
,
,/ ~)
/?
/.
I
.--,.
D. Off-site Conservation Measures
Because of the crisis created by the multi-year drought in
California and the extreme short-term water rationing/use
restrictions adopted to respond to the situation, attention is
being given to formulating new policies which will conserve
water and allow for long-term growth.
As noted in the preceding sections, al though the proj ect
implements a variety of water conserving practices, the
construction and occupation of these projects will result in
an increased demand for water. The drought has demonstrated
that water is a finite resource and that current supplies
cannot reliably support current demands and unlimited contin-
ued growth. However, growth is major component of both the
state's and, especially, the local San Diego area economy. In
order to accommodate growth, while long term water supply
options are evaluated and implemented, new programs to more
efficiently use the available water are being proposed.
An initial area of focus is the retro-fit of plumbing fixtures
and landscape irrigation in existing development. According
to statistics compiled by the Construction Industry Federation
(CIF) retro-fitting the shower and toilet fixtures in approxi-
mately 2.8 older homes would save the amount of interior-use
water required by one new home (additional older homes would
be required to offset outdoor water use at the new home).
Thus a mitigation program which collected fees to complete
such conversions, or directly required equivalent conversions,
could allow a limited amount of new development to occur
without creating a net increase in water demand. comparable
water savings could also be achieved by retro-fitting irriga-
tion systems of schools, parks, golf courses, etc., where sig-
nificant conservation of irrigation water could be achieved.
This type of water consumption off-set program has been
conceptually approved by the San Diego County Water Authority.
Additional studies to determine the exact specifications,
scope and implementation process are now underway. In order
to avoid conflicting regulations and to maximize fairness,
such a program would need to be implemented on a wide basis,
preferably county-wide. The City and local water district
would provide input in the establishment of the large scale
program and would probably provide local implementation.
As indicated earlier, several potential water offset programs
are being studied by the City of Chula vista and various water
agencies. If an offset policy is adopted in the future,
development within the EastLake Greens SPA will be required to
comply.
(Rev.(7/12/91t~0e!t~!)
.a
;' :' /,/'
IV. IMPLEMENTATION/MONITORING
Implementation of the Water Conservation Plan shall be primarily
the responsibility of the Master Developer. The Master Developer
will establish requirements and guidelines for merchant builders
and provide educational materials and guidance to new homeowners.
The Master Developer will also install drought tolerant landscap-
ing, approved by the City, in selected streets capes and open space
areas. The Master Developer will also require the inclusion of
drought tolerant plant materials and efficient irrigation systems
in the majority of builder installed landscaping. Related
mitigation measures are specified in EIRs 81-03, 86-04, and IS 92-
04 which are incorporated herein by reference.
A significant responsibility will also rest with the City of Chula
vista to ensure/enforce the provisions of this plan, specifically
the Planning, Building, and Park and Recreation Departments. The
Planning and Building Departments will review plan submittals to
ensure that water conservation measures are properly included. The
Parks and Recreation Department will approve planting and irriga-
tion plans for public parks and open space.
Mains and laterals for reclaimed water will be installed with the
major road and infrastructure improvements. The provision of
reclaimed water is the responsibility of the otay Water District,
which will also be responsible for enforcing water quality
regulations. The determination to use reclaimed water for
irrigation purposes rests with the city Parks and Recreation
Department for parks and open space areas, and the Sweetwater Union
High School District and Chula vista Elementary School District,
for the junior high and elementary school sites.
In order to ensure that all provisions of this plan are met, the
standard review of landscape and construction documents preformed
by the city will include an evaluation of compliance with the
provisions of this Water Conservation Plan. This approach will
allow for a formal determination by the City that each of the
required measures are implemented. Future discretionary or
administrative actions with regard to development within the
EastLake Greens SPA (e.g., tentative map, building or grading
permit, etc.) may be utilized to address or ensure compliance with
the prescribed water conservation measures.
(Rev. (7/12 / 91~!lt~~t~\f)
,~
..., I
. \
V. REFERENCES
cinti & Associates; EastLake Greens Draft SPA Plan. May 30,
1989.
.....................................'........................................................................................................................
ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co.; EastLake Greens SPA
and EastLake Trails Pre-zone and Annexation Draft Supplemental
EIR. April 1989.
ERC Environmental and Energy Services Company; Draft Supplemental
EIR EastLake III/Olympic Traininq Center. August 1989.
Luke-Dudek civil Engineers; EastLake Planned Community Water
Conservation Study. September 1989.
Luke-Dudek civil Engineers; Water Conservation Recommendations
for EastLake Greens. November 1989.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; Final Draft
Reqional Urban Water Manaqement Plan. July 1990.
"Water Rationing Plan Includes S.D. County"; Los Anqeles Times.
San Dieqo county Edition, page A-1, December 12, 1990.
Willdan Associates and Bud Gray; Draft Growth Manaqement Proqram
- City of Chula vista. August 1990.
(Rev. 7/12 / 91~:~t~:~:t:!~)
UJ
I'
f
EASTLAKE GREENS
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
11/17/95 Strikeout/Red line Draft
Text Remoycdr:g~~t::IUQ.1l
EastLake South Greens (Phases 1, 2, and 3) Amendment
(Jm~tSP'i!Wnlan.::~~name.n.t
. .............................................................................................,.. ..................................................
. . .................. ...........
Approved By:
Chula Vista City Council
October 17, 1995
Prepared by:
JAY KNIEP LAND PLANNING
(916)-541-1817
/,
"
REVISION RECORD:
(1 9 '17 '93:.:::t::t,.:~~)
. . :f::~:~~!~~~t~*?:
#1
10/1 7/95
Comprehensive revision/update to reflect
completion of EastLake North Greens and
revised phasing for EastLake South Greens.
EWE_
~::::at!fR~
.......-........------... ......
~
/1 ~?
~ _,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
-EASTLAKE GREENS-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
Page
I. Introduction
A. Background and Regulatory Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
B. Purpose................................. 2
C. Key Assumptions ........................... 3
D. Consistency............................... 3
E. Regulation of Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
II. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Requirements for
Future Development
A. Needed Facilities ........................... 9
B. Summary of 111:::ig'::Projects .................. 27
c. ~11::::~::::Projec(phaslng...................... 40
D. Summary of Costs to Buildout .................. 42
ill. Public Facilities Phasing and Requirements for Development
A. ~1i;,::~::::(EastLake Greens) Project Phasing .......... 43
B. phaslIlgHprogram for Regional Facilities ............ 43
C. Phasing Program for Parkland .................. 44
IV. Public Facilities and Infrastmcture Financing
A. Overview............................... 45
B. Review of Financing Programs Available
and in Place in Plan Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 46
V. Implementation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
(10/17/9~f1.l~i~~)
u
'} --l
-,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
FIGURES Page
1. Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2. Project Components. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3. EastLake North/South Greens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
TABLES
ll.~~~~!~~~f~,=!'!::::::::::::~:::::~::::::~::::::~:::i~:::::~::::::~::::::~:::::~:::::~::::::~::::::~:::::~:::::~::::::~::i::~:::::~:::::~::::::~::::::::::!=!
~q. Improved Parkland Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 44
EXHIBITS
A. Circulation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10
B. Domestic Water Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 12
C. Reclaimed Water Plan ....................... 14
D. Wastewater Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 17
E. Stormwater Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18
F. Parks Plan .............................. 23
G. Trails Plan .............................. 24
MAPS
1. North Greens Improvements ................... 29
2. North Greens Improvements (cont'd) .............. 30
3. South Greens Improvements-Phase 1 .............. 32
4. South Greens Improvements-Phase 2 .............. 35
5. South Greens Improvements-Phase 3 .............. 37
6. EastLake Greens Regioftal;lIi. Improvements . . . . . .. 39
7. EastLake Greens Phasing ..................... 41
(10/17 /9S:J:~:r:~ffm~) -Ai"
/1,,//;'
,/') ._....t "".
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND and REGULATORY CONTEXT
This Public Facilities Financing Plan ("PFFP") is a required element of the Planned Community
District Regulations adopted for the EastLake Planned Community. More specifically, the
District Regulations require that a Public Facilities Financing Plan be approved by the City of
Chula Vista prior to or concurrent with the adoption of a Sectional Planning Area ("SPA") Plan
for an area within the EastLake Planned Community.
Figures 1 and 2 are a Vicinity Map and a Project Component Map, respectively, illustrating the
location of the project in the City of Chula Vista and as part of the Eastern Territories of the
City of Chula Vista (that area generally easterly of Interstate 805).
On February 19, 1985, a Public Facilities Financing Plan for the initial development phase of
the EastLake Planned Community, known as EastIAke I, was adopted by the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista as an element of the related SPA document. SPA #1 is EastLake I
(EastLake Hills and EastLake Shores) and SPA #2 is EastLake Greens. This document is
intended to address public facility needs associated with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan ~Ii
.. ..............
This document includes revisions to the PFFP originally prepared when the EastLake Greens
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan was approved in 1989. Since that time, development has
progressed in the northern portion of the SPA and numerous public facility improvements have
been made both on- and off-site. These revisions update the original PFFP and addresses only
those facilities which remain to be constructed in conjunction with development within the
southern portion of the EastLake Greens SPA (EastLake South Greens). This PFFP update also
reflects the minor amendment to the EastLake Greens SPA Plan (Figure 3) and related project
plans approved by the City Council on August 16, 1994 .:irl::::lIllfill~illR::::IIII.~
i_:::RI;:;::::!:::i:::i::~;;!:::!:il:i~~~!~f:~~:f:l~i:i:i:::f:~l:~:i:::::::::.
Since 1989, the city of Chula Vista has developed a comprehensive approach to addressing new
development and the impacts it places on public facilities and services. What was previously
a project-by-project approach to facilities improvement and financing has become a
comprehensive city-wide policy. The original EastLake Greens PFFP incorporated several
project specific phasing and financing programs. These have since been replaced by the
comprehensive city-wide program which is utilized in this revised PFFP.
The adoption of the Growth Management Program and Implementing Ordinance (No. 2448) in
May 1991 formalized a comprehensive system to manage growth in the city of Chula Vista.
This system implements the Growth Management Element of the General Plan by directing and
coordinating future growth in order to guarantee the timely provision of new or expanded public
facilities and services to serve new development.
(19!171951Jt~~~$)
...................
,1
J j/
A key component of the Growth Management Program are the "threshold standards" used by
the City to evaluate the adequacy of public facilities and services. City Council Resolution No.
13346 approved threshold standards for eleven public facilities and services. The original eleven
categories, traffic, police, fire/EMS, schools, libraries, parks and recreation, water, sewer,
drainage, air quality, and fiscal impact, were subsequently augmented by adding civic facilities
and corporation yard. The condition of each of these facility/service systems is reviewed
annually by the City's Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) which makes
recommendations to the City Council regarding compliance with the threshold standards. Should
the thresholds be violated, the City Council shall take appropriate action to ameliorate the
situation by requiring facility/service improvement or restricting new development.
As noted above, the original EastLake Greens PFFP was adopted in 1989. Previous to that, in
1985, a PFFP for the initial development in the EastLake Planned Community, EastLake I (Hills
and Shores neighborhoods), was approved (see Figure 2). The project sequencing in this
EastLake Greens PFFP (beginning with project #53, as listed in the Summary of Projects
beginning on pg. 26"f) is a continuation of that from the EastLake I PFFP (which ended with
project #52).
B. PURPOSE
The purpose of the Public Facilities Financing Plan is to implement the City's Growth
Management Program and to meet the General Plan goals and objectives, specifically those of
the Growth Management Element. The Growth Management Program ensures that development
occurs only when the necessary public facilities and services exist or are provided concurrent
with the demands of new development. The Growth Management Program requires that a PFFP
be prepared for every new development project which requires either SPA Plan or tentative map
approval.
Regarding required public facilities, the Public Facility Financing Plan identifies a preliminary
cost estimate for each improvement as well as funding sources appropriate for the type of public
facility involved.
The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to be a dynamic and flexible document. The
goal of the Financing Plan is to assure adequate levels of service are achieved for all public
facilities impacted by the project. It is understood that assumed growth projections and related
public facility needs are subject to a number of external factors such as the state of the economy,
the City's future land use approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that the funding sources
specified herein may change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements
of either state or federal law . It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding pro-
grams be handled as administrative revisions, whereas revisions to the facilities-driven growth
phases are to be accomplished through a Public Facilities Financing Plan update process, as set
forth herein.
(10/17 195i~!t~j:~)
~
/./-1.
.';...--, .
C. KEY ASSUMPTIONS
There are a number of key assumptions implicit to this Public Facilities Financing Plan. The
assumptions playa major part in determining public facility needs, the timing of those needs and
the staging of growth corresponding to the various facilities. Key land use and phasing
assumptions can be summarized as follows:
1. EastLake I SPA (SPA #1) and EastLake Greens SPA (SPA #2) are initial development
phases of the 3,200+ acre EastLake Planned Community to be developed within the city
of Chula Vista. Future development will be implemented in phases generally consistent
with the information utilized in the City's Transportation Phasing Plan. The EastLake
Planned Community is subject to future land use approvals and growth management
decisions by the various jurisdictions involved, such as the City's Growth Management
Program.
2. Land use allocation and intensity of development will be regulated by the EastLake
Planned Community (PC) General Development Plan, PC D.~~~.:!.;.;.~~.e.~.~~!~?~s, and the
EastLake Greens SPA Plan as amended on August 16, 1994 ~~?f;(;\f:::;:;:::(::(;f:;:/:r:::::f:r:.
D. CONSISTENCY
The provisions of the Public Facilities Financing Plan are, to the extent practical, consistent with
and reinforce certain other public documents. More specifically, consistency with the following
documents has been addressed in the context of this Public Facilities Financing Plan:
1. The PFFP adopted for the EastLake I SPA development and the originally adopted PFFP
for EastLake Greens SPA. It is also consistent with the improvement projects previously
completed or under construction as a part of the EastLake Planned Community.
2. The EastLake Greens Environmental Impact Report and subsequent CEQA documents
prepared for plan amendments. The various mitigation measures pertaining to public
facilities which remain to be constructed within the EastLak:e Greens SPA are incorporated
in the projects herein.
3. The PFFPs prepared for other eastern Chula Vista projects. Consistency with these
documents is with respect to area-wide facility plans and obligations.
4. The Chula Vista Growth Management Program including the thresholds standards, as
described above in Section A.
5. The city of Chula Vista Development Impact Fee (DIF) programs.
(10/17/95:tJt!i~~)
j::
-'. I
) ...
!
I
NO SCALE
Rancho
Sant. Fe
.......,
\
Poway\
\
+
I
I
:+
I
,.
o
~ EASTlAKE r
~
· EASTLAKE
GREENS
,
c
o
// ~._j
.J ,I/-/
, / '7
FIGURE 1
WILLDAN/SIMPSON
VICINITY MAP
-f-JCJ)
O-f-J
Q)e
.~ Q)
0c
-0
Ll.o..
E
o
()
z
o
en
z
~
x
w
ClCl
t-
o
w
..,
o
a:
a.
z
CD
Gl
......
OGl
.r:_
cnc
W . Gl
~ CDO
<_CD
...J:I:CD
t-_~
CI) III 10
< c.::J
wcnm
10
w ~!!
::.:::: Gllll
<......
...J Cll-
t- '" (')
CI) III III
<c.c.
WC/)cn
CD CD
Wlll'tl
~_O
<!!O
...J>::~
0.:
t-"'IO(I)
CI) 11I11I U
< c. c.t-
WcncnO
w
~
<
..J
t>
<
w
t-
o
z
o
z
w
ffi
...J
-.............
................
...............
~mmmillL
.......
.......
.. . . . .. .
~........
........1
........1
.........
'i.,,~/" u.::"',;;"; .... 1.e: t;. . ......'. .
'.." .~.. ..~~.....) . .-..-....,
~"';...... ................ ._~YT.......y
.... .-y........ .............~...... <:........~-
/.............. ................... "-I ...... ~.-'
.' . .. .. .. . . .. . .. () .............. .... '.-
t.. (I) ............. .............. ..:.-
.. _ .......... ... L..... .............. _
j .. ....,........... ... r- ............~
f.. ~ ........... ...0 .........!!..",.,
:: :: CI)::: : : : : : : :: :::....::: :.:;..~-
I. .. .- ........... ........,.....
,... > ........... .....,-
r. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .........
.......It........
~. . . . . . .
I . .~....
.............
... .......
. . . .
I~
1;<1
~
'"
ffi 0;
i'i
:c] ""
u
~ 8
0 S'
o CoO l~
EJ 1010
~Ol
C'?.....
C\jO
,C'?
lO'-
co
>>
C>Cl>
a: a:
d
u
.-
z
w
LIJ~
~~
'11;
lni
~~
~..I ~
z
<(
--I
a..
z
o
-
~
N
-
--I
-
I-
::>
W
J-
-
C/)
e..
~ ~~~:!~~g~~~rn~~~;b~:!~~~
F=> ..... ,... N......- N .....,...
:;J
"0
0)(\,,:0 CO 0 0 ,... CO
C")"""V,......<O'l:tlt'> C")
- <'II .....
<'II
.:; ..........lI)CO CD..,. (O.,,(')-CO- t")lI)"," 0 Ii) U')OCD
~CNN....~~~~~~~~~O~~~~
f!l?a - -
o
"
OUO..,crtOM..,. ~
::c?o)o;~";cO CD
~
..
.
..
()
0(
o
III
~~~~~~ci~~:~~~~~:::~ ~~~~~~: ~
.....-~NN,...,...- M.....,...N--,...N ...-...- -N ...- N
..,
~~=NO-O=~O~-~=M~~.-
mO~mci~M~~MN~~~~~~O~
---....-...- ,... CDm
-
..
!
()
0(
>-
~. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~
iC.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ____N~_
C~OOOOOIi)Ii)~~lI)lI)U')U')U')U')Ii)U')U')lI)lI) ~~~~O~
,g,g (5 ~~~~
D.g ~~~~~~ C
..~~ 0"-0"0"0"0 ~
~~~ 0~OOO~....... "
i~~8~~~BB ~~~~~~~~.~
00'<: .w...... ... ... 0 Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q. .-
._ OE~~~~ 0000000 0
oQ~.E~~~~ccCCCCC ...
.!!:a:a-a~ E.2l.2l.2\2'8.8.8.8.8.8.8.:a ~
=~~~w8~~~~ooOOOOO~~
:e:-c
.
- ..
CO::>>
+="a
cC
Q)"
"0-1
.- ..
CJ) .,z __N -NM..,.:'CO,.....
a:(J) U E . OO~Cl:'~~t"J.,.~chchchchchchch
I lii::J ~~00~~Cl.Cl.Cl.OOOOOOO
CCl.Z
o
Z
llooooooooooooooo~~~~~ ~~~~~o~
CO :!~
+= ...
c-- .O-N(,)""~CD"""COcrtO-N(,).U')CD"""~ .
m~~-N(')""lI)CD.....~crt----------NNNNNNNNN -
"0 lii::J ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:r:rci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci:ci: S
'Ci) Cl.Z ~
Q) ~
a:
,j,
o
.J
.J/
. (
:;J
"0
CO
C')
t--
C\I
E-, ~.
~ !
......I""~~
1:: .~ ~
fi~ j .
\J~j
o
C\Ill1
M:a
,;
LV)
i
fQ)
t :s
I .Q>
J l.L
f
o
"
C\I
M
It)
CO
Il!
~. I
j! ~
.l!.lI i
Ii J
15 i
II !
~i j l
11 : j !
!~ i J ;
I ~ 0 ~
- I
iii
;2
o
Q)
"e-
o.
LLI Ul ~~
~~j~
SLLI ~~
~ 0:: c(
Ul(.!)
;:is
..~"
E. REGULATION ofDEVEWPMENT
As referenced above, this Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to serve as the basis for
reviewing public facility requirements associated with localized development phasing and,
thereby, provide a means to insure that public facilities are installed in a timely manner. With
this in mind, a series of development "phases" have been keyed to specific public facility
improvement projects such that public facility improvement sequence and related funding
assurances can be paced with growth within EastLake Greens and other nearby projects.
For each public facility identified, a certain status of implementation is specified for threshold
monitoring purposes. Generally speaking, public facilities located on-site and off-site must be
"committed" in the manner specified herein in a particular phase or increment of development
prior to building permits being issued for a subsequent phase.
When "Commitment" of required improvements necessitates condemnation of land off-site of
EastLake Greens, the obligation to start construction may be waived if improvement plans are
finalized for approval, a condemnation proceeding has been initiated and estimated funds for
right-of-way acquisition and construction have been deposited with the City in the form of cash,
bonds, a letter of credit or other acceptable form of financial guarantee.
Obligations to governmental entities other than the City (e.g., school district) will be considered
"committed" when the obligation has been satisfied as evidenced in writing from the entity.
In some instances, substitution of improvements may be appropriate. Where substitution is
contemplated, the threshold standards of the Growth Management Program will be used as the
basis for determining the acceptability of such substitution. Substitutions will be initiated only
upon written request to the Director of Public Works.
Before exceeding cumulative levels of development for any threshold standard, the required
improvements of the threshold must be committed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public
Works. The Director of Public Works shall have the ability to select from any of the following
options prior to building permits being issued for a subsequent phase:
1. Improvements must be completed or open to public use, whichever first occurs or,
2. Improvement must be subject to an awarded construction contract by a governmental
agency or,
3. Improvement must be committed by an agreement with the City which shall include,
but not be limited to, all of the following requirements to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works:
a. All discretionary permits must be obtained for construction of the
improvement;
(19!17/93:~:n~irg~)-:t:-
//"
~,i ('? ~.7
, /--:' /
b. Plans for the construction of the improvement must have all necessary
governmental approvals;
c. Adequate funds (i.e., letter of credit, cash deposit, or performance bond) must
be available such that the City can construct the improvement if either
construction has not commenced within 30 days of issuance of a notice to
proceed by the Director of Public Works, or construction is not progressing
towards completion in a manner considered reasonable to the Director of
Public Works.
(10/17/9~~ltfl!f.J) :8=
/1
~
~.
~, '
CHAPTER II
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
REOUIREMENTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
This chapter describes the public facilities required to support the development of the EastLake
Greens (SPA #2) as well as identifying the public facilities required to support the cumulative
development of EastLake and other properties in the Eastern Territories, pursuant to the Growth
Management Program.
A. NEEDED FACILITIES
Transportation
The public street system serving the project area is the responsibility of the Chula Vista Public
Works Department, except for County roads adjacent to the project area. Transportation system
projects required to support ultimate development of SPA #2, as well as adjacent areas, are
identified in the Traffic Analysis for EastLake Expansion, dated September 26, 1988, as
prepared for the City of Chula Vista by Willdan Associates, and subsequent similar studies for
nearby projects. The Traffic Analysis was performed in the context of Environmental Impact
Report preparation and, as a result, identifies measures necessary to mitigate transportation
system impacts associated with EastLake Greens (SPA #2) and EastLake Trails.
The transportation projects necessary to accommodate phased build-out of SPA #2, are of two
basic types:
1. Those facilities that provide for circulation within SPA #2 and which primarily
benefit the EastLake development. Circulation system components of this type yet
to be constructed include collector roads and local residential streets. These
improvements will be constructed to the ultimate City standards in accordance with
Subdivision Map Act exactions keyed, via tentative tract map conditions, to the
recordation of specific subdivision maps. (See Circulation Plan Exhibit A).
2. Those facilities that are necessary for SPA #2 development but which provide area-
wide circulation benefits to other eastern area developments as well, as identified in
the Eastern Area Transportation DIP program. Circulation system components of
this type which are yet to be constructed consist of major and prime arterials (i.e.,
Hunte Parkway and East Orange Avenue).
Regarding streets and highways of area-wide benefit, the City Council has recognized the
necessity for a Development Impact Fee (DIF) to provide a funding source for road projects of
regional significance in the area east of Interstate 805. The Eastern Area Transportation DIF
was established initially for the EastLake area only in 1988 and subsequently converted to
include the entire Eastern Territories. EastLake's SPA #1 and SPA #2 have been included
(10/17/9j:nn*I~)
9'
~/ ....,i --
/i ,/:/,:/,/
r>/
c
o
~
"5
~
G~"
i~
~
i
!
" ! i
1I"
"
t
j
"
~
.
t
J
..
o
.
;.
! Q
...-..;
'-~I'..l
U.
r
- Nl ~
,/~';
;;' /'/
, -
J
o
;
J
.
.
;;
~
W \\
/
(
I
I
(
\ \.
,
\ .1",
, ',.
1: ·
--.... -
-::::--~ -
/' -- I ,
/y/ t;
,,:y /.
/..:::> , -
-"/
./
/-
",/." '
/', /'
/~..,,./
//
-" /"
,/'j
/,L
~ i-.:.....
E-., ~~
~H
'_1 COO~ a:
C .~~..
\J"-.!!!i
Co. ~ .
-gj
..-
...JJ
~
+oJ
.-
.0
.-
.c
x
W
LIJ"l~
~~ i!-
SLUb
~~<
Ul(!)
;:i5
~
within the area of benefit for the existing Transportation DIF. As such, development within the
SPA's will be responsible for Transportation DIF payments.
The obligation toward DIF program participation can be met in two ways, either by payment of
the fees in effect to the City of Chula Vista at the time building permits are issued or through
the construction of qualified DIF related projects. The former allows construction of required
facilities by the City of Chula Vista when sufficient monies have been collected or on a pay-as-
you go basis, while the latter allows the developer to construct the facility when needed in
exchange for a credit toward DIF obligations. Should a developer's cost to construct a DIF
project exceed the developer's fee obligation, reimbursement will be made as future fees are
collected by the City. The exact basis for reimbursement may be set by a future, separate
agreement, to be entered into between the City and developer specifying how the developer will
be reimbursed by those projects benefitting from the construction of DIF projects but who do
not contribute to their completion. Such an agreement will, among other things, specify the
maximum amount of DIF credit to be granted, consistent with the method of determining DIF
fees and reimbursements due under such calculation, if any.
In addition to the Eastern Area Transportation DIF, the City has established a DIF program to
finance interim improvements within the SR-125 corridor, known as the Interim SR 125 DIF.
The EastLake South Greens project is included in this program and will be required to pay the
fees in effect at the time building permits are issued.
SP A #2, will be required to participate in two levels of traffic signal improvements. The traffic
signals planned within the boundaries of SPA #2, are considered the sole benefit of SPA #2.
The new traffic generated by the development will also have an impact on the need for citywide
signals and signal upgrades. All development within the SPA #2 areas would also be liable for
payment of the current Traffic Signal Fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Water
Both SPA #1 and SPA #2 are located within the boundaries of the Otay Water District (OWD),
which is responsible for providing local water service. OWD receives its water for the San
Diego Water Authority via the second San Diego Aqueduct.
Although described here for information, the manner in which EastLake will ensure the
adequacy of potable water from OWD shall be the subject of separate agreements between
developer and OWD. The water facilities (i.e., pumping, storage, piping, etc.) will be
constructed as planned, to conform with the current own Master Plan.
This provision of the Public Facilities Financing Plan sets forth the anticipated means by which
water service will be ensured for the EastLake I and Greens projects.
The area is currently served by two 980' zone 5 million gallon reservoirs and pump station,
(EastLake Pump Station). The backbone water lines constructed within the service area were
oversized to meet future water requirements and have the capacity to serve the SPA #2
development.
(10/17.'9S;l~:tltm~)
.1:1_
-J i
'LEGEND
EXIST.
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -.-.-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 - _ _ _
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 .........
DOMESTIC WATER PLAN
-:r JUt) /
EXHIBIT B
-_ J(),/
J -- .7./
RICK FN;INEERThX:; COvfpANY
Based on an analysis of existing and proposed conditions, the following supplemental water
system improvements have been recommended ("*" indicates project completed):
1. Increase the pumping capacity of the Central Area Pump Station (711' zone) from
4,000 GPM to 8,000 GPM. *
2. Add 2 million gallons of storage capacity at the ID 22-1 Reservoir site located within
SPA #2 boundaries. *
3. Add a 4,000 GPM pump to the existing 980-zone pump station.
4. Install various transmission and distribution mains in accordance with the current
OWD Master Plan.
OWD Improvement District 22 (ID 22) has installed a number of improvements to provide water
for SPA #1 and #2 development. These include an approximately 3 million gallon reservoir to
serve the 711' pressure zone and the two 5 million gallon reservoirs to serve the 980' pressure
zone. OWD also completed an 8 million gallon reservoir to serve the areas to the west (Bonita
Long Canyon and Rancho del Rey). OWD has annexed SPA #2 to ID 22.
In addition to the existing ID 22 improvements, improvements required in conjunction with the
recently formed Improvement District 27 (ID 27) will also need to be funded. ID 27 includes
the developments of Rancho del Rey, EastLake and Rancho del Sur (Sunbow). A Master Plan
has been prepared by OWD to determine required facilities, cost, and financing mechanisms.
The most significant facility that will need to be provided is a terminal storage reservoir which
will provide terminal storage to meet demands of the participating developments within the ID
27 boundaries. A 30 MG reservoir is being constructed and nearing completion with financing
from ID 27.
The necessary area-wide improvements (e.g., pump station, reservoirs, etc.) to serve EastLake
South Greens have already been provided or financially committed in conjunction with previous
development within the EastLake Planned Community or other projects. The project is within
OWD Improvement District (ID) 22 and ID 27 which provide such facilities with special district
financing such as capacity fees or other means. The remaining local service water facilities will
be constructed as a part of local street improvements as a part of the subdivision exaction (see
Exhibit B).
Reclaimed Water
Reclaimed water is available for irrigation purposes from the Dtay Water District's Ralph W.
Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF). These facilities are currently capable of
producing 1.3 million gallons of reclaimed water per day meeting Title 22 requirements. At
present, Otay Water District is providing approximately 750 acre-feet of reclaimed water per
year for irrigation purposes.
(10/17 .'9$~:~:f~jf~i)
1:J
./ ~)
'LEGEND
EXIST.
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -.-.-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 - - - - .
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 ..........
RECLAIMED WATER PLAN
/ /1
:]-1'2.401
EXHIBIT C
R1CKEN;~CCIvlPANY
The proposed reclaimed water distribution system within the SPA #2 area is shown on Exhibit
C. The reclaimed water distribution facilities (i.e., pumping, storage, piping, etc.) will be
constructed to conform to the current OWD Master Plan. The system backbone has been
planned to provide reclaimed water for landscape irrigation to the EastLake Greens golf course,
high school, community park and open spaces. These facilities will utilize the existing
production capacity of the RWCWRF's 1.3 million gallons per day plant capacity. Additional
capacity has been designed into the system to allow expanded reclaimed water irrigation usage
should the Otay Water District facilities be expanded to provide additional quantities of
reclaimed water.
A 20-inch reclaimed water supply line was constructed in phases within SPA #1 (i.e., Lane
Avenue) and extends from the terminus located at Telegraph Canyon Road to the Otay Water
District Use Area. This pipeline was constructed to provide water for grading operations and
landscape irrigation demands for the SPA #2 area and other portions of the region.
As with domestic water service, the off-site connections and major reclaimed water facilities for
EastLake South Greens have already been provided (golf course irrigation system is shown on
Exhibit C). Transmission and distribution pipelines for street landscaping remain to be
constructed. These will be included in the local street construction projects.
Sewer/Waste Water
The City of Chula Vista provides sewage collection through City-owned facilities. The sewage
is discharged into the City of San Diego Metropolitan Sewage System (METRO) for treatment
at the Point Lorna regional plant and disposal through the METRO Ocean Outfall.
EastLake SPA #1 and #2 is divided into five separate basins. These basins are (1) Telegraph
Canyon; (2) Proctor Valley; (3) Long Canyon; (4) Salt Creek and (5) Poggi Canyon.
The majority of EastLake SPA#I/#2 will sewer to the Telegraph Canyon basin through the
existing City of Chula Vista I5-inch trunk sewer in Telegraph Canyon Road. Additional sub-
regional sewage system facilities will be necessary to adequately serve SPA #1 and SPA #2 at
buildout. In the context of SPA #1 development to date, off-tract trunk sewer connections have
been completed to collection facilities within East "H" Street and Corral Canyon Road, and
along Proctor Valley Road.
These existing facilities are to be utilized to serve the needs of SPA areas within other basins
pending phased implementation of additional sub-regional sewer facilities. Existing trunk sewer
capacity needs to be closely monitored. Monitoring of the existing I5-inch sewer trunk line in
Telegraph Canyon Road is being provided by EastLake through the existing sewage monitoring
agreement with the City. Prior to the time that existing capacity limitations are reached, the
following public facilities must be implemented:
1. Install one or more of the following as necessary to serve a portion of the SPA #2
area as well as other future development:
(1O/17/9SJ:r~f:im~)
-3':
.'
a. Install a new trunk sewer parallel to portions of the existing Telegraph Canyon
trunk sewer, to provide additional capacity for temporary pumping from the
Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins.
b. Extend a new trunk sewer southerly along Salt Creek to the Otay River Valley
and then westerly to the City of Chula Vista's existing collection system. This
would gravity sewer to the Salt Creek basin portion of the property but still
require pumping of the Poggi Canyon Basin flow.
In 1990, the City entered into an agreement with EastLake Development Company whereby
EastLake would fund the preparation of an Improvement and Financing Plan for sewer
improvements within the Telegraph Canyon sewer basin in return for permission to pump flows
into the basin on a temporary basis. The plan was to allocate cost responsibility for providing
trunk sewer improvements and ensure that such improvements were provided in a timely manner
such that the capacity of the trunk sewer was not exceeded. A report was prepared which
identified the improvements necessary to accommodate gravity sewage flows generated within
the basin to build-out. Recognizing that further improvements within the Telegraph Canyon
sewer basin would be required to serve additional development in the Salt Creek and Poggi
Canyon basins, the report was revised to identify the improvements necessary to accommodate
the addition of pumped flows originating from selected development in those basins, including
EastLake South Greens. The report identified four phases of development to reach build-out
within the basin. According to the report, the existing system has sufficient capacity for
approximately the first three development phases. During phases III and IV the construction of
additional facilities will be required to accommodate all projected development. The City has
established a fee program for new development to finance such improvements. The report also
recommends monitoring of sewer flows as existing capacity is approached to assure improve-
ments can be provided when necessary.
The City has initiated a monitoring program to determine the impacts of additional gravity and
pumped flows to the existing facilities in the basin. The EastLake South Greens project, along
with other projects in the area, will contribute fees as they develop to provide financing for
Telegraph Canyon basin improvements when they are required. Since the monitoring and fee
program is in place to provide new facilities when required, any needed improvements to serve
the pumped flows from EastLake South Greens should be in place when required.
The planned wastewater collection system for SPA #2 is shown on Exhibit D. Interim pumping
to the Telegraph Canyon Basin is proposed for the portions of the project which ultimately drain
to the Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. These pump stations will be abandoned or relocated
when one or more of the above referenced permanent alternatives is implemented.
(10/ 17 .'9S:~:1.nllf.~)
w.
'.
RO~O
~~S
t.:i~
0"'( r
LEGEND
EXIST. .
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -.-.-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 - - _ _
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 .........
~UMP HOUSE . <!)
WASTE;WATER
COLLECTION PLAN
/ ')
.
J-I'24()/
EXHIBIT D
'! "I RIcK EN:;INEERll'-G C<:l\.1PANY
//
-r"
.. Et.s1'
.
;)
I
/
.~
STORM WATER
DRAINAGE PLAN
/ ' i ~,' ('. g
j-I'Z4-01
.
EXHIBIT E
RIcK~CC1vfpANY
Drainaee
SP A #2 will be served by a series of on-site drainage facilities that will serve to collect and
convey the storm water runoff. Facilities will be designed to handle peak discharges in
accordance with City standards. These facilities consist of a series of surface conveyances,
desilting basins, transmission pipelines, and detention basins (temporary and permanent).
Stormwater runoff will be detained in on-site detention basins and discharged to off-site areas
in the Telegraph Canyon, Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. The Baldwin Company, owner
of the adjacent property, has agreed to accept these flows and provide for the detention of peak
flows downstream within their project. The planned storm water drainage system is shown on
Exhibit E.
As an alternative to the construction and maintenance of large basins, improvement of the
Telegraph Canyon Channel has been undertaken through the creation of a drainage district
funded by fees collected from all undeveloped properties within the boundaries of the district.
Since adopted, such fees are required from SPA #2 within the district boundaries.
Stormwater runoff from the EastLake South Greens project will be detained in on-site basins and
discharged to off-site areas in the Poggi Canyon or Salt Creek drainage basins as shown in
Exhibit E.
School Facilities
SPA #1 and SPA #2 are both located within the Sweetwater Union High School District and
Chula Vista Elementary School District. In December 1986, EastLake Development Company
entered into Agreements with the Sweetwater Union High School District and Chula Vista
Elementary School District authorizing the formation of Community Facilities Districts for the
purpose of financing high school, middle school and elementary school capacity to serve the
EastLake Community, including SPA #1 and SPA #2. A Community Facilities District under
the Mello-Roos legislation is currently in place for financing all school facilities to meet the
needs of SPA #1 and SPA #2.
In compliance with the December 1986 Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School
District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has provided
to the Sweetwater Union High School District a site for a senior high school of forty-nine gross
acres. SPA H2 shall not be subject to the payment of school impact fees for secondary school
facilities. (Reference is made to the Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School District
and EastLake Development Company dated December 11, 1986 and "Special Tax Consultant
Report" dated June 1986 for specifics.)
In accordance with the December 1986 Agreement between Chula Vista Elementary School
District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has agreed to
sell to the Chula Vista Elementary School District four school sites of approximately ten (10)
net usable acres each within the entire EastLake development. The purchase price for such
property shall be the lesser of twenty percent (20%) of the appraised value of the site or $23,000
per acre, adjusted annually.
(10/17 /95:nUt(~~)
:t9-
- ~
, ,
~ ..
.7
In September 1988, in partial satisfaction of this Agreement, the Chula Vista Elementary School
District acquired an elementary school site within the SPA #1 area. A second elementary school
site has been provided within SPA #2. In addition to the authorization of a special tax and
issuance of bonds, the Chula Vista Elementary School District has authorized a maximum impact
fee of $600 per residential dwelling unit, subject to annual escalation adjustment (currently
$780), payable at time of building permit. (Reference is made to the Agreement between Chula
Vista Elementary School District and EastLake Development Company dated December 9, 1986
and "Special Consultant Report" dated June 1986 for specifics.)
Parkland Dedication
Planned park and recreation uses within SPA #2 include the dedication of a 15.1 acre public
community park which includes approximately 1.1 acres of slopes. The other recreational
elements, which include three neighborhood parks totaling ~!f~ net acres, are en'lisionedto
be privately owned and maintained. Also, a&-l-f::t~:':Ai acre public neighborhood park is
proposed adjacent to thc elementary school~~I~.~9H~~.:i;~i.i and will be maintained by
the City of Chula Vista. In addition to the public ~igq9iIl:,"mm:::community parks, and
private neighborhood parks, a Community Trail SystemwIifpro.videaPconnection between all
major focal points within SPA #2 and extend north into SPA #1 and east into EastLake Trails
(See Exhibits F & G). Park and recreation facilities within SPA #2 are listed in the table below
along with their gressij~t and credit acreage, per the adopted SPA Plan.
'l-ip~:IYi~
PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES
Projected
Parcel#
Park Type
Net
Acres
% Credie
Credit Acres
P-l
P-2
P-3
P-4
P-5
Public Community Park*
Private Neighborhood Park*
Public Neighborhood Park
Private Neighborhood Park!
Private Neighborhood Park
Golf Course/Public
Trails
12.9
3.2
&-1~9~~
3.7
3.~
1.1
100%
50%
100%
50%
50%
12.9
1.6
&f:~Q~9
1.9p.P
1.~~
100%
-Ll
TOTALS
"" {\~~:::'iIi
::Tt;"7'"~~:i!~
~I~~g
*INDICATES COMPLETED FACILITY
tACTUAL PARK CREDIT WILL BE BASED ON UNITS DEVELOPED AND THE FINAL PARK PLANS TO BE APPROVED BY THE
~;;g_.w:;m_~il.lij=1I1=.~IIII.=I.'=11
mmr.m~~
(10/17!951:~:t~+~$)
.~
-- :;~",/
The Parkland Dedication Ordinance (PDO) requires approximately ~f~S? acres of improved
parkland for the revised ~g~:~gEastLal(e Greens project, according to theHapproved SPA Plan.
EastLake Greens (SPA #2) is proposing a total of ~?8i~ net acres of usable public and private
improved parkland, however, ~~S:~ acres is intended to consist of three private neighborhood
parks. These private parks may receive up to a maximum of 50% parkland credit. Therefore,
the ~gg~~ acre total will be reduced per the table above. SP A #2 is projected to meet the
City's Parkland Dedication requirement, with a B~~p acre surplus, according to the parkland
analysis provided in the revised SPA Plan. [However, it should be noted that for the EastLake
project overall there is still a deficit. Per the EastLake III Development Agreement in April
1990, EastLake is responsible for dedicating an additional 5 acres of usable, improved park area.
Also per the EastLake III Development Agreement, the developer is responsible for dedicating
an additional 2 acres of usable improved park area to make up for the loss of 2 acres in the
EastLake Greens Community Park.]
Parkland Improvement
EastLake is proposing to provide the City with fully improved parks as follows: Community
park (12.9 net acres), neighborhood park (&f~~sQ net acres), 3 private neighborhood parks
(1O.2Q.~ net acres at a maximum of 50% credit), plus trails, for a total of ~8R~~ acres of
usable improved parkland that may qualify for credit under the City Ordinance.
It shall be required that EastLake provide improvements at or beyond the above specified level
as turn key park facilities or pay park fees in lieu thereof. The determination of park
improvements, obligations and/or credit by the developer shall be based upon approval of
acceptable design and improvement plans for parks by the Director of Parks and Recreation prior
to recordation of the final map.
The Community Park was completed during the initial phase of SPA #2 (EastLake North
Greens). It was the responsibility of the developer to prepare a master plan that is acceptable
to the City Council, to grade the site according to that plan, and to install improvements. These
improvements included street improvements, turf and an automatic irrigation system,
landscaping, play areas and other amenities required by the PD~. The community park is
located adjacent to the high school site to provide the opportunity for joint maintenance by the
City and the Sweetwater Union High School District due to combined use of park and school
facilities.
(lO/17/95UUiUQ:$)
...................
.21:.
) ,
.j /
Phasing of parkland improvements is alse-addressed in Chapter III.
All of the open space and public parks will be provided through select open space easements
and/or offer of dedication to the City of Chula Vista. Private parks will be subject to open space
easements which are intended to guarantee the City of Chula Vista that private parks will remain
as recreational amenities. Maintenance of the public community park and public neighborhood
parks will be provided by the City. Maintenance of the golf course and clubhouse facilities will
be the responsibility of the operator and will be independent of the Homeowner's Association.
Maintenance of private parks and open space areas will be provided by property owners through
Homeowner Associations, open space maintenance districts or similar mechanisms.
Street Liehtine and Landscape Maintenance
Funding for the maintenance of landscaped street medians, landscaped parkways and
supplemental street lighting within public right-of-ways or dedicated maintenance easements are
borne by the benefitted property owners through a Maintenance District established under the
provisions of the Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part 2, Streets and Highway
Code).
Currently, all of SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2 are within the boundaries of EastLake
Maintenance District No.1, approved and adopted by the City of Chula Vista December 17,
1985, which maintains street medians and parkways. The balance of SPA #2 will be annexed
to EastLake Maintenance District No.1.
A Homeowners Association has been formed in EastLake Greens (SPA #2) to maintain
landscaping located on private common areas and open space not accepted by the City for
maintenance.
(10/11!9S,~lr~%~~)
:.~
~
\/
'Cn-Q)
~~ '"
'"""c. IS
~(f) "" ~ :l .. .. I~ J
'" 0
~ g
c J
~ -I!: .f
:. :.
.. I - .
0 J ! .. .. oil
0 ~ ~
.. I
rlt -' ~
~ ! "" E
... i
0
~ ...
. ~ 0 t:1
0 0
0 0
\
\ i-;
--___..1'
~It .
-., --.
---..."
,~
.'
E -..... ; ~ u..
, ~c. ~
.-;- .0
.~ ~:: ~
.-1"'~.~ w
c .2~ .
f'~ ~ .
\Jjj
..
<=
..
Q.
c
.,
E
~
.~
1
&
<=
..
o
c
..
0:
!
'"
~
(3
~
..
..
.,
.0
~
~ WUl ji~
~zU
~Wuo
~W~~
tii~ ~-
;:;s~
"~I
15.
~ LIJ 1Il ~~
{~ZH
~ ~LIJ 8~
~ .....~ LIJ ~ 6
~ _ 6~
jl"':' Ul~~-
~ 11\
i~\.:.I
I "~_I
/ . ?... '\
/~~"<<'~" ;; .;;.;~~~A'~~\\
//~ '~O'.~:~" ~ ~ ~~%:~O """ \ \
/ /{/ '" . . .// "'1>> '"" .' , " '
/.:.t) " ~ " I' ,;/~~ f'li'Jil"'- '. \ .!
//~>~~a <>'>.~ d /~~ 'Ii ,......~l- ~ ~l
;'!lY ' ;c~ ' "V<>~ H /.f".~';J' "'.~... ' &1
fi:f'" 0, "",' " ~'" .' d':f$'" , )r<c" "':,,~~"- '" E~
Ii/I:;; r: ~ li-,) ~~~ ( ;A.~'ii':::::""---- ~~ ~-- ..~>~-'~%-- S'" ;)fJ> - - c' '~~~ -- .\'"f4f.,\ \.\ ~~
( , ~ "IlLY ,0;;>:>' ~ ,.,~..;;""",~~./ '" ' ".. , '~."" / ....~""'~ \ ~ <
J r'-' ' ", , )~ ~ fJY w 1"""l1i",ill "-'- ""'" '" ." ", " 'I; V' .' ·
ll'~ "'::1,: ~",..., ': ,I; ~i o'I')"c>~'~!':\L ~ -~)/~~~'1-~<1\~\ ~ iX
, . ... .'" . ",,.;;' ,.' 1 .F I, n".' "I .,"" '1;2.' ' ,>
\ '\'\,0 . '" " .:7.,"'" . J _:' .,:~"" " ('j' / /jj? "" . , " J', f ;---i;\f2115 ,\ \ ::. ~
\.. <1 "" I " ~,.' . " "... ) ".,. "" . -""
't-' ,( I I O/~ I ~---</ 0 '1\) /,.. .~ If' D,J 1;11:0'
\.\ P . :', 'f ',: Y \" , l~,: v' .r'.' ./'" h) ", JH2~
, \0' \'!'!I~ !. . L,',.\ ' ." "I "' " ' .. '"
\~~_ \\\!Lj~~J'- _( (,- 'IICL~<.'~~' .;, 0 · ,,\ ," 7,,/' ,.c' ,,~y) ... :':;:; \
\' \ \\\~ ;~\ f ) 'I _,_ I ~"I~ 100, \ I 11(Q-;( .'/ /~,~, ;:. i Pt;;;I
\ '\"" 0 _~ ' _ " I ,e ' ? ~. b~l?
\ G 'I' ~~ '.~ '-" <;_ '0 {r "- ~ c ' \ \ c' ,"",0 ~
\ \ '~, ~\o. " " \\ __ (11(\ /' L~ ~OO
c..e) ~ "'~ ,.A, ",,,,.J' "",. " :,:" " ,. /'~/ ,..
-:-__ \ J/~~\ ~~_ W~.' 5:\) \;\ \,\""J,~ ]J~- ji/ll rJ- I ill \:\ "'i-..~@" ^O
,~ .. va... ;VI ~\\ \" L h' / 01 _ ~ \ II .0 J:iII. 'I ~V'\
~ _ "j',' " ~~' f\v~ II' \,\\ \\),-:J 1/,;;' \- 01:(11 J- ] II" I~' ~ta1 ; '.--< }~ '
\ .. 0.,. ~,. \1 \ ~ _ \ 1(, 0'. I r ~ \ I o.,~ ,;/ ^V '
~:o; :%,.) ~ \Y' \ Y& , L_.P"' , / .if!"! 'I ',\' .-1;1:,' \ 0A:}V \
'Q ,'\'-"ff~ ( ), ..f" III. .(M c , ',~' ...~ \ ( AV. \\
\ Q /'~ ,,~.::. /_~t"I\"'.") ,.~.A'\J '/ C 'jj,tFJ....' "ifi':-~C-~")}~ .~:,."'r4i ..c\y . ,
\ "Q ~~~~~_ y/ / \/, ~~il if _ "\') _~_____ -1~?,-' '~~,,~~V ~v-
'1<> n I ") ~~.~ iJ ''^ .~I 'J (" I 0.'" ~
\,.... ,.", ( .J;<' , ".'''''' r"-'-'-"-
fi;'J::::::~.,t.iiiiii~iffPiiiiii~~~@~'" _6>~' "--~I.
OH, ___~.Q~~:!;? n\\OO // ~io 6'Vf T
': Co CJl . ""0 O'-~.. 'I. <" ; 0 I
.1fi1: \ · --!_~, / 1"o'o'08'5'SO'Oi;i~J','" ..~:; !
~ \ ' I" . \, _- I .-..I,I:;~..':e~ "V' I
_ II', II g I \ -...Ii'""""> .... :
\ _ -0( , ~ I I "~j...... I
~ >- . l,,) / rr-r ...
\ ____~~....... 'i II ~ - 4 ~rA~-
//?",~" ~~ " "'10./, II
\ ' ,,,!:' .-o~ ., < y "
" )\ ~", 1~1
. //\ _./ ~ "''i";.J<'~'o,, , '~
._..-- L...L t~- IJI
_~_-_~-- ___ s~,'. ' 1,1/
__.______n____' - ~noli I J
._-_.~~_._- :
_--.:-~~'-
i
c
CO
0:
J!1
.@
r=
----..., ,
Cl.
o
iii
en
IV
eo
c
~
'"
en
:>
IV
.,
:;
o
()
<5
Cl
.
.
.
.
.
:
.
ro
""
~
'"
~
"0
0-
2~
.8~ Q)
ij, ., .,
~~ .~~ In
a>G; .....:2 ~
~~ ~~ 8
5E Cl,,) >0
() _ ~ ';i '"
::.;0 EE ~
c3~ 8~ .:L
j _ iii
W 0
W 0
~ 0
'l:
'"
~
c:
'"
...J
(;
c:
~
'l:
'"
E
"0
c:
'"
...J
(;
....
::;:
c:
'"
0::
0;
.,
"0
.,
ll..
i:I
Ll
o
.
....
'."/Y
CJ
-
:0
:.E
x
ill
I
I
.
f
:
!
I
i
lI'" .,,8
i ~ !~
o . .
- --
OJ
EJ
Mass Transit
The EastLake Planned Community Transportation Plan (1982), based on analysis of proposed
land uses, expected travel demands and other characteristics of the area, concluded that public
transit demands could best be served through extension of the existing public bus system.
Extension of this system should occur as EastLake population growth generates sufficient
demands to justify additions to the Chula Vista transit system line haul.
Public mass transit is provided by Chula Vista Transit which operates a bus system within the
city of Chula Vista. The system has been extended to the EastLake Planned Community as
increased population and demand have justified. No service is currently provided to SPA #2.
The nearest service is within the EastLake Business Center, north of Telegraph Canyon Road.
Continued expansion of transit service is expected to occur as further development within the
vicinity warrants.
Library
Library facilities are provided by the Chula Vista Library Department. In 1991, the City
adopted a DIF program to pay for nine categories of public facilities including libraries. The
SP A #2 project is located within the boundaries of the public facilities DIF program and will be
subject to payment of the fee in effect at the time building permits are issued.
As an obligation of SPA #1, a one-acre library site shall be dedicated to the City of Chula Vista
if the City determines that a branch library site is appropriate within the EastLake Planned
Community area. If needed, the library site would be incorporated within the EastLake Village
Center area with the actual site to be determined by the City in the context of subsequent site
plan approval processes associated with the project area. Alternative locations within future
EastLake SPA's will also be considered.
As a further obligation, the Developer was required to provide the City of Chula Vista with up
to 4,000 square feet within the EastLake Village Center for interim storefront library purposes.
This obligation has been met through participation agreements for the joint city/school district
library on the EastLake High School campus. This experimental program began operation in
1993 at EastLake High School. This facility currently provides library services to the EastLake
project area.
Fire Protection
Fire protection services for SPA #1 and #2 will be provided by the City of Chula Vista. The
development of SPA #1 and #2 will require the construction of a 3,500 square foot permanent
fire station to serve the local area.
The previous Public Facilities Financing Plan for SPA #1 established provisions for the payment
of fees for the construction of a fire station to serve EastLake SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2.
(lO/17/93iUtJ.1ffl$)
.................. .
tt
) /
The schedule for constructing and equipping the fire station to service the EastLake SPA #1
areas shall be in accordance with the City's Fire Station Master Plan.
Services to the EastLake South Greens project and surrounding area is served by an interim fire
station located within the EastLake Business Center which was provided by EastLake
Development Company. Location of a permanent station to serve the area will be determined
as development occurs within the response area.
Fire facilities are included in the Public Facilities DIF program adopted by the City in 1991.
SPA #2 is located within the boundaries of the public facilities DIF program and will be subject
to payment of the fee in effect at the time building permits are issued. These fees may be off-set
by DIF credit granted for provision of the interim fire station.
Police Protection
The city of Chula Vista will increase police service levels as the service area continues to grow.
Expansion in the eastern territories has created, however, a need to improve communication
facilities. Two specific identified needs include a communications tower or antenna and an
improved computer-aided dispatching system. Costs for these are estimated at $24,000 and
$530,000, respectively. The police facilitates will be of overall City benefit and will require
City-wide financing.
Police facilities are included in the Public Facilities DIF program adopted by the City in 1991.
The EastLake South Greens project is located within the boundaries of the public facilities DIF
program and will be subject to payment of the fee in effect at the time building permits are
issued.n
(1O/17.'9$~;~tt)l;ff.~) :26
,/ /i S ;/ {:~
B. SUMMARY OF SP&I#Z)PRO.JECTS
EastLake North Greens
Proiect # Amount Method of Financine
53* Construct EastLake Parkway as a $3,020,000 Subdivision Exaction/
4-lane Major between Otay Lakes Future Assessment
Road and SDG&E transmission District
easement
54* Construct Clubhouse Drive as a 4- $350,000 Subdivision Exaction!
lane Major between EastLake Park- Future Assessment
way and North Greensview District
55* Construct North Greensview as a 2- $2,600,000 Subdivision Exaction
lane Collector between Clubhouse
Drive and Hunte Parkway
56* Construct Neighborhood Park #1 $590,000 Development Impact
(Augusta Park, P-2) Fee for Parks
57* Construct EastLake Community Park $2,758,752 Development Impact
(P-I) Fee for Parks
58* Construct Greensgate as a 4-lane $540,000 Subdivision Exaction!
Major between EastLake Parkway Future Assessment
and North Greensview District
59* Construct Clubhouse Drive as a 2- $1,566,000 Subdivision Exaction!
lane Collector between North Future Assessment
Greensview and Hunte Parkway District
60* Realign!construct Otay Lakes Road $4,575,000 Subdivision Exaction!
to a full section Major between Lane Transportation DIP/
A venue and Hunte Parkway Future Assessment
District
61* Construct Neighborhood Park $1,130,000 Development Impact
(Country Club Park, P-4) Fee for Parks
62* Construct EastLake High School, $12,209,000 Community Facilities
Phase 1 District #1
* INDICATES COMPLETED FACILITY
(19!17/9Sofl~!i~l)
"l:f
~ ..-/
EastLake North Greens (cont'd)
Proiect No. Amount Method of Financine
63** Construct OWD terminal storage $21,600,000 Improvement District
reservOIr
63a Increase pumping capacity of N/AV General Obligation
EastLake Pump Station from 4,000 Bonds
to 8,000 GPM
63b* Add 2 MG capacity at ID 22-1 N/AV Subdivision Exaction/
reservoir site Assessment District
64+ Construct water reclamation plant, $3,000,000 Subdivision Exaction/
pump station and transmission main Future Assessment
connection to OWD reclaimed water District
system,
or
65+ Extend new trunk sewer southerly $7,650,720 Subdivision Exaction/
along Salt Creek to Otay River Sewer DIP
Valley then westerly to existing
Chula Vista System
66* Construct Hunte Parkway to a full $1,000,000 Transportation DIPI
width Major between Otay Lakes Assessment District
Road and Clubhouse Drive
NORTII GREENS TOTAL
$59,589,472
* INDICATES COMPLETED FACILITY
** INDICATES FACILITY UNDER CONSTRUCTION
+ PROJ. NO. 65 SELECTED; PROJ. NO. 64 NOT TO BE CONSTRUCTED & NOT IN TOTAL COST
(19'17 '9S~::1:':'1:~:~-~)
. r :~t.;J~~!i~i~R~
-~
1/
rJCi1ti
&~
_ co.. ()l. _2>>_
1/13/88 ~
EASTLAKE NORTH GREENS
PHASE ION-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
MAP 1
WILLDANI SIMPSON
'/
[!Jerni
&~
-Ilio;D.CA____
~~
M4/88 I ~ I
EASTLAKE NORTH GREENS MAP 2
PHASE ION-SITE IMPROVEMENTS 'WILLDAN/SIMPSON
,.- .-- -
- ;' .
---;, -,'-:
EastI~ke South Greens - Phase 1
Proiect No.
67* Construct South Greensview Drive as
a 2-lane collector from Clubhouse
Drive to Unit 6 with utilities and
underground improvements
68a Grade Neighborhood Park (City
Park, P 3)
69~*Construct Elementary School #2
SOUTII GREENS - PHASE 1 TOTAL
* INDICATES COMPLETED FACILITY
(19/17/951Jl!ltJ.,$,)
..................,
-%}
Amount Method of Financine
$1,206,500 Subdivision Exaction/
Assessment District
$12,000 Park Fees
$4,975,000 Community Facilities
District # 1
$6,193,599
~~~IJ:~~
..........................
.rc
/~
tn
etn
cot)
co.~
L..O
e>C:
.c~
...... G)
- :s tn
OCU
.c
(J)D..'
UJ \Il ~~
~Zi~
'tUJ Va
....I UJ I ~
lii~ <
~(!)
..---
r- -, !~
_ t!'"
~ ~ ~Ol
'_1 OU' a:
\J.s .~ ~:.
~;
=:.
./i /;
/",/
('f)
a.
CO
~
EastLake South Greens - Phase 2
Project # Amount Method of Financine
68b Impro'lc Neighborhood Park (City $1,088,000 Park Fees
Park, P 3)
~~~ Construct East Orange A venue $350,000 Subdivision Exaction
Sewage Pump Station
70a Construct Hunte Parkway as a 4-lane $938,000 Transportation DIP I
major from Clubhouse Drive to Assessment District
South Greensview
70b Construct Hunte Parkway as a 4-lane $700,000 Transportation DIFI
major from South Greensview to Assessment District
East Orange A venue (required with
improvement of East Orange Ave.
from Hunte to OTC or with Phase 2,
whichever occurs first)
71 Construct South Greensview Drive as $1,919,500 Subdivision Exaction/
a 2-lane Collector between Hunte Assessment District
Parkway and Silverado Drive with
utilities and underground improve-
ments
72a Grade Greens South Park (HOA $5,000 Park Fees/Developer
Park, P- 5) Contribution
73a Grade half-width East Orange Ave. $307,500 Transportation DIF/
from Hunte Parkway to the westerly Assessment District
SDG&E easement boundary with
storm drain improvements
73b Grade full-width and construct full- $5,000,000 Transportation DIF
width improvements for East Orange
Ave. to the westerly SDG&E ease-
ment boundary (as required by TM
condition, or as revised by City
Engineer and approved by Council)
(1 g.' 17.'93:f::~tt1Ug~)
-33
i '. ,..
""r' -
EastLake South Greens - Phase 2 (cont'd.)
Project #
7~a Construct Silverado Drive from
Clubhouse Drive to So. Greensview
Drive per condition on TM
or
7~b Construct that portion of So. Greens-
view Drive included in Phase 3 per
terms of the Acquisition Agreement
soum GREENS - PHASE 2 TOTAL
# cost included in Phase 3 total
(10/17!9~!Jl!l~$)
...................
-34-
Amount Method of Financin2
$500,000 Subdivision Exaction
$1,000,000# Subdivision Exaction/
Assessment District
$19,898,900
I~g!~.
:' f/
tn
etn
Glt)
co.~
L..O
C>e:
..eN
....., CD
::Jtn
OCU
enS:
UJ \Il ~~
~Zi~
'tUJ Va
.....I UJ I~
lii~ <
~~
".-1
v
Cl.
CO
~
-)C
"-0')
<0
61'2
V61
~
~.
~ no(
"b \,v
(t)
I'-
..0
0(:)
~
~;.---" ~~
. " '" ~'-
-===-=-_ -JL _~'o_>___.
=,
/lBM)VBd
r- -, !~
_ t!~
~~~(;j
_-""I :.Ij! a:
.....1.= -
\]'
Si: ~ -!:is
.-" ""."~.-
./ _J
EastLake South Greens - Phase 3
Project #
72b Improve Greens South Park mIl
ml::f1r?) UUUUUU
7S4b Construct South Greensview Drive as
a 2-lane collector from Unit 6 to
Silverado Drive with utilities and
underground improvements
ffig:~::~':~!i~:gg::~!mRt9!f~~.:I~~8nRgr~
11'.~:::t~!I::~:.i\~:~~::rttil
........................................-...............
76 Construct EastLake Parkway as a 4-
lane Major between the SDG&E
easement and the SPA #2 boundary
as needed to provide access to devel-
opment sites
SOUTH GREENS - PHASE 3 TOTAL
(1O/17/9SJJUlllti)
j;Q-
Amount Method of Financina:
$595,000 Park Fees/Developer
Contribution
$1,000,000 Subdivision Exaction/
Assessment District
i!~:.~:m~~ ml:::I.
$860,000 Transportation DIP/
Assessment District
$2,455,000
Iu u"'S"u 'S,uS" ....Uu..OO'...u.
. . . . . .
::.:J::.:.:i:):::}:::::::::::::::::.:
-: ,,; /.
''',' / (.,.
tn
c:::tn
Cl)1:)
CD.~
L..O
C>C:
.J::M
,...., G)
_::s~
O.c
enD..
!i~l-l:lS
--~
UJ\Ilz ~~
.~ i~
'tUJ Va
.....w ~5
~e:::: ~~
Ul(D
~
"~-I
LO
a.
ctS
~
r- -, I\~
_ ~'"
~ ~ ~o;
'_1 ou' a:
~ :::0
C::~~
t'."-'.
\1::';
-;
...~ /1//-1
. ,/
SPA #2 (EastLake Greens) Off-Sites
The following projects are regional in nature. The funding and timing of their construction is
controlled primarily by DIF programs. The listing below describes the anticipated contribution
to these programs by EastLake Greens.
Project #
77 Install traffic signal improvements on
Telegraph Canyon Rd. at Canyon
Plaza Shopping Center between 1-805
to Paseo del Rey
78 Re-time traffic signal improvements
along Telegraph Canyon Road
79 Construct/extend EastLake Parkway
as a 4-Jane Major between the SPA
#2 boundary and East Orange A ve-
nue
80 Install eastbound dual left turn lanes
at I-805/Telegraph Canyon Road
interchange (*Phase 1 to provide
additional turn lane complete, Phase
2 to provide 1 additional eastbound
Jane through the intersection)
81 * Construct reclaimed water distribu-
tion main from OWD Use Area to
existing main in Lane A venue
82 Construct parallel trunk sewer in
Telegraph Canyon Road from Hunte
Parkway to a yet to be defined point
downstream
Greens - Off-Sites Subtotal
GREENS - PHASE 3 TOTAL
* INDICATES COMPLETED FACILITY
(10/17/93:~:~:f~iffl) 38-.
Amount Method of Financine:
$110,000 Transportation DIF/
Traffic Signal Fund
$25,000 City Staff/Traffic Signal
Fund
N/ A V Transportation DIF/
Assessment District
$100,000 Transportation DIP
$750,000 Dedication by
Developer
$3,221,000 Subdivision Exaction/
Sewer DIP
$4,206,000
$7,482,009
m~Ztl:~.
, .. /i //
// )/',1
I
l
- --/ ~/'
rFJ
r:s UJ. ^ J;~
~ . .....~vz I .c5
:s ~ Sg
U ~LU ~~
~ ILU ~6
r"'l ~ ^'-' ~!;
~ Ul...... <(
~;:i5(D
o Ill."
c:
o
.-
+-'
as
CJ
o
....J
~ ,.
=~s
c~ f;
GoO ;
o6oJ
o
Q)
e-
O
"-
it EJ :]
C. SPAJJltZEA8TLAKE CREEN8 PHASING
The EastLake North Greens development phase of SPA #2 is complete exeept for residential
parcel R-22. The anticipated phasing for the EastLake South Greens project is expected to
include three phases as depicted on Map 7. A brief description of each phase is presented
below:
North Greens
EastLake North Greens includes a golf course, 1,175 dwelling units, 19.6 acres of commercial
development, a high school and community park, and two private parks.
South Greens
Phase 1
Phase 1 includes approximately 4G4aQ~ dwelling units and site prcparatiofl. for the clcmefltary
school and adjacent public park, andHconstruction of the elementary school.
Phase 2
Phase 2 includes approximately +4911~ dwellinglll1~t~,iH.1I>~()\'~llle~t()rt~eHPl:!~~icH~~~~~()rhood
park, site prcparatiofl for a pri'..ate park81Imi.:::::::iti::::::II:::::::IjYli::::i:iiiiiiieIE::::lP1fi and
construction of the sewage pump station.
Phase 3
~..:~ii.:mpth.::::..bbd.~::J:.~.:~.:;.:: ~r~:~~~~~:~n ~~~~~9p~~~;I~~k~nits.~::::;:J.11::::::liYi!.j9!:::::::gtl::::I!:::::::.~m
..... ... ---,-... .........
Future Phase
This phase includesl:g residential pareel5 which ha~ aD. interim designation on the Site
Utilization Plan. It is....anticipated that theseii pareel5 wiii be' subject of a SPA Plan amendment
prior to development. Any necessary PFPP revisions would be included in that amendment.
Pareels in this phase are R-26, R-9, and FU (~g DU per current Site Utilization Plan).
Although geographically linked to the pareels with aJiHlnterim designation, parcels gf.~'; PQ-l
and PQ-2 may be developed with pHblie/quasi pHblic Hses as permitted by the adoptc<fspA Plan
and PC Regulations, once infrastructure is available to serve them (completion of project #76
in Phase 3). No PPFP projects are included in this phase.
(10!17!9SI*~~~~~)
..4{}.
".. -......
EJ '"
'"
;:::
LO N
..- ......... m
I ~ ~
0:: 0
0 T'~
1.0 o4-l c:.... .
......... C'""
~ 0 <0 \}~~
0 ..-
0 lJ) I ~ .
1.0 ........0:: "Et
0 (") ::> ..-
I 00- ...J,
C 0::..- lL.
........
I
0) (") ';":0:: -.:t <0
I I I C\I
0:: 0::0 0:: I
t: .- ..- 0::
tn l{) 1"-. (") Q)
.- C\I C\l0:: C\I UJ 0>
s:: tn I co I I ctS I
0:: C\I 0:: C\I 0:: 0::
Q) C'G I ..- .s:: en
lJ) 0:: lJ) I M lJ) 0..
- Q; N Q; 0:: Q; Q;
Q) .t: Q) 0 0 Q) ~ Q) 0 Q) 0
~ C\I <0 ~ L. ~
.... c.. f/) ro I f/) ro I f/) ro :3 ro
ctS a. 0:: ctS a. 0:: ctS a. a.
C) ....,
.s:: .s:: .s:: :3
~ 0.. 0.. 0.. u..
.t: 0 t'-
~ Q)
~ .~ Q.
0
0 .... ct:S
U) c.. ~
LIJ \Il J; ~
~zi~
~UJ u~
'::'UJ ]~
til~ <
;:j5(!)
..---
/-; _.
D. SUMMARY OF COSTS TO BUILDOUT
North Greens
South Greens - Phase 1
South Greens - Phase 2
South Greens - Phase 3
South Greens Off-Sites
TOTAL
(lO/17.'9j:UlJrf.i.m)
..h...............
/_~,
$59,589,472
$6, 193,500Ri~~:i:~~lm
$1 0, 808,00<I~lIltE
$i! 4SS GOO!=i::;c:~~:::t\tV\
, ,iMHeeWID?H
$4.206.000
$82,933,220
~*fltl~.
_42:,-
. ; .....-!
:5 -<,
CHAPTER III
PUBLIC PACILITY PHASING REOUIREMENTS
FOR DEVELOPMENT
A. ~,~:::~:r~?:~EASTLAKE GREENSl PROJECT PHASING
The EastLake Greens (SPA #2) on-site improvements by phase are summarized in Table
-l:j4 below:
Table No. +1
IMPROVEMENT PHASING STATUS
Phase
Proposed Development
SPA #1
Proiect No.
Page Number
North Greens
1,175 DDs, HS, Com-
munity & 2 Neighbor-
hood Parks, 19.6 Ac.
Commercial
53 to 66
26f29
~
South Greens
1
4G4351 DUs, Elem.
School, gradc P 3 park
67, 68a,-69
~
30f31
2
~w*~~: DUs, improve P
3 pa:rk, grade P- 5 park,
construct sewage pump
station
68b, 70 to 75
~:::I:::%I~
~
~i,i!
3
438;II.~ DUs, complete
P_5oooparI4.~:::..I::::ltl
pI! OHOHHOHOOHHHOHuuHHHH
72b, ~ i.11
176HHHH
39-4G
~iffili
Future Phase
~. DUs
None
B. PHASING PROGRAM for REGIONAL FACILITIES
Regional or area-wide serving facilities are generally included in the various DIF programs
(transportation, public facilities, Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin, etc.) and will be provided
as required with financing secured. The provisions of the Chula Vista Growth Management
(10/17.'93:~:lt~1:If:) 43
./ -:;
Program, including the threshold standards for specific facilities and services will be the
overriding control on development, as noted in the introductory chapter of this plan.
C. PHASlNG PROGRAM for PARKLAND
Parkland is to be provided according to a 3 acres/lOOO population standard. Per the analysis
in the adopted SPA Plan, SPA #2 as whole may exceed this standard depending upon the
final resolution of credits for the proposed private parks and as qualified by the EastLake III
Development Agreement which requires additional park acreage in EastLake III. The
following table provides a phasing analysis of the provision of improved parkland using
parkland standards from the Park Dedication Ordinance, unit type assumptions from the
adopted SPA Plan, and phasing from this PPFP.
Table No. ~~.
IMPROVED PARKLAND PHASING
SPA#Z
Phase Res. DU
Park Req'd.
Parks Complete
Surplus/
Deficit
North 1,175
1.0....5......
. . .. ...."....
.-... .'..".'-.-.-.
-l-+-:-G ...;~Q:':
P-l (12.9 credit ac.)
P-2 (1.6 credit ac.)
P-4 (1.9 credit ac.)
+5.4~ ac.
South
I 4043..51
3.~$ ac.
None
+H***
I 3.3:~Hl
+2.3g~*
2 74Q'1$1
3 4$.$+S6
7 . 3~.8
'1 0:1:.:...0..
~"::.;::Q
P 3 (8.7 credit oc')~99~
ItB:~~~f~:RtIi~:.~~.)
P-5 (1..ji~ credit ac.)
Golf Course/
Trails (1.1 credit ac.)
Future mill,
1 N):...1.I: ac
~~~ffi .
None
+1.~~5
TOTALS ~4~jq~ ~Ih~ ac.
~A!*Q credit ac.
+ 1. 31}11
(10/17/9S0ntr?'~)
.~..
-., :~-.y
CHAPTER IV
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
A. OVERVIEW
EastLake Development Company and the City will ensure the appropriate public facility
financing mechanisms are utilized to fund the acquisition, construction and maintenance of public
facilities required to support the planned development of the EastLake Greens (SPA #2) project,
in complianee with the city's Growth Management Program.
Public facilities are generally provided or financed in one of the following ways:
I. Subdivision Exaction
Developer constructed and finaneed as a condition
of project approval.
2. Development Impact Fee (DIF)
Funded through the collection of an impact fee.
Constructed by the public agency or developer
constructed with a reimbursement or credit against
specific fees.
3. Debt Financing
Funded using one of several debt finance mech-
anIsms. Constructed by public agency or devel-
oper.
It is anticipated that all three methods will be utilized for the SPA #2 project to construct and
finance public facilities.
B. REVIEW of FINANCING PROGRAMS A V AILABLE and in PLACE in PLAN AREA
Subdivision Exactions
Neighborhood level public improvements will be constructed simultaneously with related
subdivisions. Through the use of the Subdivision Map Act, it is the responsibility of the
developer to provide for all local street, utility and recreation improvements. The use of
subdivision conditions and exactions, where appropriate, will ensure that the construction of
neighborhood facilities is timed with actual development.
The imposition of subdivision conditions and exactions does not preclude the use of other public
facilities financing mechanisms to finance the public improvements, where appropriate.
Development Impact Fee Proerams
Development Imp;lct Fees (DIF) are imposed by various governmental agencies, consistent with
State law, to contribute to the financing of capital improvements within the city of Chula Vista.
The distinguishing factor between a fee and a subdivision exaction is that exactions are required
(10/17!9StJl!1.it.$,)
...................
~
, j
of a specific developer for a specific project whereas fees are levied on all development projects
within the benefit area, pursuant to an established formula.
The SPA #2 project, through policy decisions by the City and other governing agencies, is
subject to fees established to help defray costs of facilities which will benefit SPA #2 and areas
beyond this specific project. These fees include but may not be limited to:
1. Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Impact Fee - Street DIF established to provide
financing for circulation element road projects of regional significance in the area east of
1-805.
2. Public Facilities Development Impact Fee - Public Pacilities DIF established to collect
funds for civic center facilities, police facility remodeling, corporation yard relocation,
libraries, fire suppression system, geographical information system, mainframe computer,
telephone system upgrade and a records management system.
3. Park Acquisition and Development Fees - PAD fee established to pay for the acquisition
and development of new park facilities.
4. Traffic Signal Fees - to pay for traffic signals associated with circulation element streets.
5. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Fee - fee established to pay for sewer basin improvements
necessitated by increased flows from future development and pumping of sewage from
other basins into the basin.
6. Telegraph Canyon Pumped Sewer Fee - fee established to pay for system upgrades within
the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin to accommodate flows generated outside of the basin.
7. Salt Creek Sewer DIF - fee established to pay for sewer basin improvements necessitated
by increased flows from future development which gravity flow to the Salt Creek Basin.
8. Interim SR 125 DIF - fee established to pay for an interim transportation facility in the SR
125 corridor alignment.
9. Otay Water District Fees - It should be noted that OWD will require annexation to an
existing improvement district or creation of some other finance mechanism which may
result in specific fees being modified. As noted earlier, SPA #2 is within the OWD
Improvement Districts Nos. 22 and 27.
Debt Finance Proerams
The city of Chula Vista has used assessment districts to finance a number of street improve-
ments, as well as sewer and drainage facilities. The Otay Municipal Water District has used
such improvement districts for water system improvements. Both school districts have
implemented Mello-Roos Community Facility Districts to finance school facilities.
(10/17/95l1n1.m$)
...................
1l6- .
i L._~
Assessment Districts
Special assessment districts may be proposed for acqumng, constructing and/or
maintaining eertain public improvements under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913,
the Improvement Bond Act of 1915, and the Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972. The
general administration of the special assessment district is the responsibility of the public
agency.
Special assessment financing may be appropriate when the value or benefit of the public
facility can be assigned to specific properties. Assessments are levied in specific amounts
against each individual property on the basis of relative benefit. Special assessments may
be used for both publicly dedicated on-site and off-site improvements.
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982
The Mello-Roos Community Pacilities Act of 1982 authorizes formation of community
facilities districts which impose special taxes to provide financing for eertain public
facilities or services. Pacilities which can be provided under the Act include the purchase,
construction, expansion, or rehabilitation of:
1. Local park, recreation, or parkway facilities;
2. Elementary and secondary school sites and structures;
3. Libraries; and,
4. Any other governmental facilities that legislative bodies are authorized to
construct, own or operate.
Other Finance Methods
General Fund
The city of Chula Vista's general fund supports many public serviees throughout the city.
The facilities and serviees included in the general fund are those which benefit not only
a new project, but also the residents of the city in general. In most cases, other financing
mechanisms are more appropriate to initially eonstruct or provide the facility or serviee.
The general fund would then be used to fund the on-going operation and maintenanee eosts
of the facility onee it is accepted by the City.
State and Federal Funding
Although rarely available to fund an entire project, federal and state financial and technical
assistanee programs are available to public agencies, in particular school districts which
receive significant funding from the state. EastLake High School was financed partially
with state funds. The city of Chula Vista has also received state funds to construct the
Montgomery/Otay Library.
(10/17.'93Unlff.$,)
...................
4i
/- ~..
-;,.:...-{ /- /
Dedications
Dedication of sites by developers for public capital improvements is a common financing
tool used to acquire land. In the case of SPA #2, the following public facility sites are
expected to be conveyed through dedication:
1. Public streets; and,
2. Public park, open space and trail systems.
Homeowner Associations
Community Homeowner Associations have been/will be formed to manage, operate and
maintain private recreation, landscape and open space.
Developer Reimbursement Agreements
Certain facilities that are off-site of the SPA #2 project and/or provide regional benefits
may be constructed in conjunction with the development of the project. In such instances,
developer reimbursement agreements will be executed to provide for a future payback to
cover the additional cost of these facilities. Other future developments will be required
to contribute their fair share of the costs for the regional facility which will provide funds
for the reimbursement.
Development Agreement
A development agreement can play an essential role in the implementation of the PFFP.
The PFPP clearly details all public facility responsibilities and assures that the construction
of all necessary public improvements will be appropriately phased with actual develop-
ment, while the development agreement identifies the obligations and requirements of both
parties, the City and developer. A development agreement has been entered into by the
city of Chula Vista and EastLake Development Company for the development of the
EastLake Greens SPA (SPA #2), including the EastLake South Greens project.
(10/17/9~!~IJ.l~$,)
...................
48
. '-'-.
-,J ~__'-)
CHAPTER V
IMPLEMENT A TION
As stated earlier, this document is intended to further address public facility needs associated
with EastLake Greens (SPA #2).
The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to both identify the various public facilities
required to support planned development of the SPA #2 Plan and to insure that these public
facilities are provided at the time they are needed. In so doing, the Public Facilities Financing
Plan designates not only on-site public facility needs but also endeavors to address regional or
area-wide improvements needed to serve the adopted SPA Plans plus cumulative planned growth
within adjaeent areas.
It is understood that assumed growth projections and related public facility needs are subject to
a number of external factors such as the state of the economy, the City's future land use
approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that the funding sourees specified herein may
change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements of either state or
federal law. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding programs be handled
administratively whereas revisions to the related facilities-driven growth "phases" are to be
accomplished through a Public Facilities Pinancing Plan update process.
(10/17/93Jil~!A!J)
...
:~./
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARINGS BY
THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AND CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the pwpose of considering
amendments to the EastLake n General Development Plan (GDP), EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA),
Planned Community District Regulations, Air Quality Improvement Plan, Water ConselVation Plan and Public Facilities
Financing Plan. The EastLake Greens master plan location is illustrated on the map duplicated on the reverse side of this
notice.
The proposed GDP and SPA amendments, filed by EastLake Development Company, consist of relocating two future
neigbborbood parks, expand the area available for community' purpose facilities, land use designation boundary
adjustments and density transfers among various parcels, including density increase on Parcel R-26, as authorized
by a previously approved General Plan amendment for this site. Parcel R-26, located south of EastLake High School,
has been previously identified as an affordable housing site. However, a development proposal for Parcel R-26 has
not been included as part of this project.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that no new supplemental EIR is necessary and has prepared an
addendum to EIR-86-04. The Addendum and the proposed GDP and SPA amendment applications are on file in the office
of the Planning Department.
Any written comments or petitions to be submitted to the Planning Commission and/or City COWlcil must be received in
the Planning Department no later than noon on the date of the hearing. Please direct any questions or comments to Project
Planner J. Luis Hernandez in the Planning Department, Public Services Building, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista California 91910, or by calling (619) 691-5090. Please include the Case Number noted at the bottom
of this notice in all correspondence.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this application in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you
or someone else raised at the public hearings described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the Planning
Commission and/or City COWlcil at or prior to the public hearings described in this notice. A copy of the application and
accompanying documentation and/or plans are on file and available for inspection and review at the City Planning
Department.
SAID PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HELD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON
Wednesday, November 29, 1995 at 7:00 p.m.
AND BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON
Tuesda~', December 12, 1995 at 6:00 p.m.)
Both hearings will be held in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, Chula Vista Civic Center, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACI (ADA)
The Ctey of Chula Vista, in c:omplying with the Ameriam With Disabilities Ad, re4luata individuab who require .pedaI ac:c:onunoctatlon to ac:c:ess,
attend and/or participate in a City mfttlnc, adivity or servic:e re4luest suc:h ac:c:ommodation at least 48 hours in advanc:e for meetincs and 5 days
for sc:heduled servic:es and adivities. Pl_ c:ontad Nanc:y Ripley for specific: infonnation at (619) 691-5101. Califomia Relay Servic:e is available
for the hearing bnpalred.
Date:
Case No:
November 17, 1995
PCM-96-07
SEE LOCATOR MAP ON REVERSE SIDE.
(M :'HOMElPLANNINGILUlSIPCM.9607. NOn
L;l),.cr;~ // d,~/ ///7?:.s-c~
:',1
I
~
~
$,
1
Amendment Key
0..,1
.
IillII PrImIiry amendment .....
......,~ __,0..)
[[[[J] Minor diMIty tranlfera
lDonIIr-'" 10....
+
Dwalllnll UnIt Incraa..
-
DwdIng UnIt 1IeOra...
~E4STLAKE
GREENS
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~: Eastlake Development DESCaPTION:
C9 MISCELLANEOUS
PROJECT Kequest: Ameodmeats to the EadaIce CireaI
ADDRESS: Eastlake Creens
GOP (GenerIJ ~Iopment Plan) ad SPA (Spec:lftc Area PI8n)
SCALE : FILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale PCM - 96 - 07
,;[#.':r ~'_.;
.
(~-96 -q:z)
lP)?
LABL 008"0 13-',,-05' XXXXXXXXXXxXXXxXXXXXxXXXXXxxxx
GDP E SPA; AI'II;ND: "EASTLAKE Gk XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXUXXli.XXX
X XXX XX XXXI( XXX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX X XX li.X llX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXX IIX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX
X XXX xx X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XX XX XX XX li. XX XX XX xx XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXX xx X'
.
XXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXli.
X XXXXX X XXX XXX XX XX X XXX XX XX xX XX).
X XXX XX X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XX XX XX XX;"
X XXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX).
X XXX XX X XXX XXX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX;..
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
.
5953211442
R ESI0I;NT*
10by TORREY PINES RD
C HUL A V 1ST A C A 91 9 15
.
.
59532U4bb
RESIDENT*
104t1 TORREY PINES RO
C HUL A V 1ST A C A 91913
5 'il53212858
RESIDI;NT*
23"1 uREE~BRIAR D~ I A
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5953212'112
RES IDI;NT*
984 PALl'! ~ALLI;Y CIRCLE' U
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
59532.1 300b
RESIDENT*
970 SQI'IERSET (T . B
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213b07
RESIDENT(\:
2539 LA COSTA AV
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
5953214938
RES IOI;NT
2531 .HISPERING PALMS LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91914
5953302500
RES IOEN1*
2 ;;00 SE A I SLANO PL
C HULA V ISlA CA 9191,
595..3u0502
RES!DENU
1 055 LAGUNA S EC A UIOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5 95.. 30 1 813
RES I DE N T*
10n LAGU~A SECA LOOP
CHJLA VISTA CA 91915
,9,3d 1"58
RESIuENT'"
1008 TURkEY PINES kD
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX). .
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX). r..
XX XX XX xx XX XXXX XX XX XX XX xXXX XX Xl. .
XX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XXXXXX XXXX XXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl. ~.,
XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXX xX xX XX XXXX XX X".
.~
I.
. -,
5953dl852
RE::'ILlENT*
23"0 GREtNbRIA~ UR . A
CHULA VISTA CA 9.913
5953l118b7
RESIUENT'"
23..5 GREENbRIA~ DR . E
CHULA VISTA ~A 91913
59,3d2927
kE S IuENT*
23bO GREEN~R!AK DR . B
CHuLA ~ISTA CA 9.9.15
59 ~3 i 130 10
RES IOE NT I;'
'170 ::'OI'lERSET CT . F
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
."'"
..
'.'l
..
'.:)
..
led
..
59,3d3b08
RE:) ILJENT*
2537 L A CD S T A A V
CHuLA vISTA CA 91910
5953.0::15005
RESILiENT
lO~O TURKEY PINES RD
CHuLA VISTA ~A q!q15
5953.30"300
RESIUENT*
a tlb COB tl ...e AD UW P L
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954J0050b
kESIOE,..T*
10b3 LAGUNA SECA LUOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954..00500
RESIDENT';;
22tlO "'ILLOR CREE~ CIk
CHUL~ VIST~ ~A 91915
.....
.
b 1t30913900
RESIOl:NT ~
1233 tlOOEGA BAY DR
CHULA VISTA CA 91'115
.
.
LABL 00840 IS-90-05
GOP t SPA; Af'll:NO: "EASTLA",E G~.
X XXX XX XXXX XXX XX XX X XXX XX XX XX XX;..
X XXX XX X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XX XX XX XX;..
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;'"
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXA
.
.
X XXX XX X XXX XXX XX XX X XXX XXXX XX XX;"
X XXXXX XXXX XXX XXXXX XXX XXXX xX XX;"
X XXXXX X XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX XX XX;.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;'"
X XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXX XXXXXX XX;..
X XXX XX X XXX XXXXX XXX XXXXXXX XXXX:"
.
.
5 950102000
BLACK HilLY H REVUCABLE TRUST
C/O Wl:STERN SALT CO
7220 TRADE ST noo
S AN 0 I E GO C A 9212.i.
.
.
.
.
5953201100
SliEl:hATER UNIO~ HIGH SCHUOL I
I STR 1(. T
l13u FIFTH AVE
CHULA VISTA. CA 01.1000
.
.
XX XX xXXX XX xX xX AX XX XX XX XX XX XXX)
XX XX....X XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX xl
XX XX XX XX XX....X XX XX lIX AXXX XXXX XXX)
XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXX)!.X XX XXXXXX)!.XX)
XX)!.XAXXXXXXX....XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XX XXAX XX XX AX XXXX XX XX XX AXXX xX X)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XX XXXXXX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) "'\ ~..
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX). ) ..
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) 1 ,.'"
) ) ..
I ,..
I I ..
I ).1
, 1 ..
5950ll011t00
- - -
P U bOX lit '1
SAN ulEGU CA 9,112
-
59~3,01000
EAST..AkE Ol::Vl:LUPMENT Cu
901.1 LANE A~E '.i.OV
CHuLA VISTA CA 919.i.1t
5953.:01BUO
SAN ulEGU ~OUNTY W
TY
UNKNUWN A
THOI<]
5953.:02200
(.HUOL I EA 5T~AIi.E D l::Vi:LUP
901.1 LANE AV 0
CHULA V CA 919.i.4
.
.
5 '1532 .1.1200
OlAv ..ATER 01 STRI\;T
UNk~
.
.
59532111t42
1:Ill11__ I __.._1 ,
"135 AR ilONA ST ''1
SAN DIEGO CA 92104
.
.
59532.i.l1t4b
. ~__.. ........_... _, wjw. ...
10bl TORREY PIN~S RD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.
.
595321l1t5~
Lllr__ "'........__
1053 TORREY PINES 1t0
CHULA V ISH CA 91915
.
.
59532111t54
"--r".~-._r 'W'~"-
~
1045 TORREY PINES RD
C HULA VISTA CA 91'115
.
,
59 ~3 ill'" 39
__ I . I ~
1075 TORREY PINES RD
CHULA VISTA LA 9.i.915
5953.:114"'3
-'I~ r --.
100 TORREY PINES RD
CHULA vISTA LA 91915
-
59 532111t 47
. _ w w.. _ _ _ _ _ lE
1059 TORREY PINES RO
CHULA VISTA loA 919!5
;9 ;3Ll14H
J _ ._. . I. I T
lO~1 TORREY PI~ES 1<0
CHULA VISTA LA q1915
;9;3,1l1t;5
"lIS l ww .... ~ w .. _ _ ..- __
10"'3 TORREv flINE~ RO
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
l .,., .
) ".0
) 1 .. )
))...
) ) .. .
11.0
1 1 ..
)).0
~~
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXX xXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXX~ XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~
595321Hbl
RESIDENT*
lObO TOkREY PINES Rl)
CHULA VISTACA ~191J
595J212tl54
RES IDENT*
2340 ~REENBRIAR DR . ~
CHULA VISTA CA ~1913
5953212<;00
RES IDEN T*
988 PALM VALLEY CIRCLe I 8
CHULA VISTA CA ~191~
59532.1.3002
RES IDtNT*
2J70 ~REENBRIAR DR I b
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953213023
RESIDENT*
9bl INDIAN PAUlS CT " 0
CHULA VISTA CA <;191;
5 95 32 13 b 12
RES lDENT*
252tl LA COSTA AV
CHULA ViSTA CA 91913
595321b 129
RI:SIDtNT*
1005 tl BAYWOOO CIR . A
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953314100
RESIDENT*
1~9b ~ATEKVILLE LAKI: kO
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
595"301tlO..
RESIDENT*
lObO LAGUNA SECA LOUP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
5<;5"407,,00
RI:SIDENT*
10eb FOkEST LAKE DR
CHUlA VISTA CA <;191,
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
xxxxxxxXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
,CJ53,,1l407
RESIDENT~
1050 TURKEY PINES RO
~HULA VI~TA CA CJ1CJ13
;953~ 128,5
KESIOENT:,;
23..0 GKE,N~RIAk OR " D
CHUlA vI~TA CA CJ1913
;953d~CJu7
KESIDENT:,;
988 PALM VALLEY CIRCLE " C
~HULA VI~TA CA 91915
;953"130'-5
kESIDENT:,;
<;70 50MEKSET CT I A
~HULA VI~TA CA 91913
;9,32130.j2
KESIUEIIlT:,;
,,3tlO GkE,NbRIAk DR , F
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
,953.:1..9,8
jo(ESIOENT
,,511 WHI~PERING PALMS LOOP
CHULA VI~TA CA Q191"
,Q!>B004uO
KESIOENT.
1057 WAT~RVILLE LAKE Ru
~HULA VI~TA CA CJ1915
,9543004U2
kESIOENT.
4033 LAGvNA SECA LOOP
(HULA VI)TA CA 91915
)9543018,,8
kESIDENT:,;
40bb LAGvNA SEeA LOOP
CHULA VI STA CA 91915
tl430~1l2,,0
kESIDENT:,;
d1b SPA"I5H BAY RO
CHULA VI)TA LA 91915
.. ")
t- .0
..
,.., . 0
..
.a
..
--- .0
. ) .'j
.0
).0
. .0
).0
.0
. ).0
.0
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXxXXXXXxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX) XXX~^XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXxXxXXXXXxXXXXXxXXXxXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXX)
XXXXXxXXXxXXXxXxXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
595';201"00
EASTLAK~ 11 A~SN
c/o KATY OJ
900 LA ~ .100
CHU VISTA CA ~191"
5q5.;201~OO
EASTLAKE uEVELOPMENT LO
9liO LA~~sH~c~
CHULA V~ "
/"
595';202';00
SAN DIE '-'0 CUUN
TY
PuB LI
k AUTHOR ~
5953211""0
1
1073 TD~RcY PINES RU
CHULA VISTA CA ~191)
595 3jt-t "....
_. n~ _ _
lOb) TORREY PINES RU
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953211....tl
I I . ..._.,_ _.
E TRUS T
1057 TORREY PINES RD
CHULA VISTA CA 9191)
5953211,,5i
~RD
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
59532.1.1"50
101~"/o~~~r RL 1
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
9.0::112
)953201buO
EASTLAKE CCUNTRY CLue PT HP
\./u LAlliE /KUH'" PA
1" CURPO....A
NEIIIPORT ACH
)9,no.::ouo
SAN U U:Gu COUNTY
TV
~OO LANE
CH~
~ I
AUTHOR!
,9,3oCll.OuO
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT co
~8~,~~
C~.~.~ ~A 9191..
'953211.....1
~""'~r 'on< "r..._~..
l.071 ....EY NES RD
CHuLA vl~TA CA 91915
5 953.2ll't ,,5
~ . -.' -....-.
10b3 TORKEY PINES RD
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
595321H "9
L III _" IT
1055 TORKEY PINES RD
CHULA vl~TA CA 9~915
,953l114,3 -
I _._~...-- -
10..7 TOR kE Y PINES RO
CHULA vI HA CA 91915
~953.211..~7
-..- I T I - -. -- - -
.1.070 T UR I<. E Y PINE S RO
l..HULA vI::.TA CA q1915
~
.0
.. J
( 00
.0.")
.el
e .0 )
.0
f .. )
'"
.. ~
00
. .0 ~
Oe>
. .O'~
00
.0 ~
. .0
5953211t,58
11,,1 .1. __ _ . _I r
10 BRuADWA Y RD .Od
KINGSIO~ b JA~AICA
W tST 1 NOIE S 00000
,'- ~
5 ~53211ltb2
3 _ '_'__ ---. .~.
POBOX 811t
BuN!TA CA 91908
5953211ltbb
~O'5~ft~~;R~Y PINESnRO
CHULA VISTA CA 91~1,
5 9532111t 70
lIL_..".. .~...... ..,.. ,~...J,
10t,t, TORREY PINES RD
CHU~A VISTA CA 9191,
5953212000
5953212t,00
LANE/~UHN PACIFIC
900 LANE A V E .
CHULA VISTA '11'11"
5953212839
- --
1000 bROADI'IUOR CT 'B
C HU L A V 1ST A C A 91 ~ 1 5
59532128t,3
_ ..K_
1001 llROADMUOR CT IA
ChU~A VISTA CA 91915
i95321281t7
__ _ _ . _ , .. .. ... & L 1 ..
2 330 ~REENBRIAR Ok .A
C HULA VISTA CA 91915
5953212851
L Ir .1.1' ...
2330 l"REENBklAR OK .E
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
5953212855
__._ . ...__., ........... .1
9888 I:R~A RO .53
SAN OlE GO C A 92131
5953212859
IA ~_ _ I
23t,1 ~REENBkIAR Ok .B
C HUL A VIS T A C A 91 ~ 15
J..
59,3d1t,59
M~ ---
f-RANCES
100b TURI<E...
CHuLA vISTA
M
PINES 1(0
CA (H915
5953dlt,03
if - -
10~8 TURkEY PINES RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953d1411
~A"2 ~o;Jf;- pFNES ItO
CHULA YISTA CA 91915
59,3d2100
LA ....E 'K uH N PAL I F I C _HO ~E S
~O U LA NE AyE
CHuLA YI A 9191..
-
59,3.::128"0
~n"".' . ---!~-
1000 B ROAOI'IOU C T .C
CHULA VISTA LA 9~915
59~3d281tt,
_, ". . _ ii ,- .
1001 BkOAOMOuR CT .B
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
5953 il28..8
_._!._n ......_. ..._.1-
2330 GREENc:lRIAR OR 't)
CHULA VISTA CA 919~5
5953d28~2
Ii{. LU' r J
P U c:lQX 12~870
CHULA VISTA CA 91912
-
59532128!)b
IRJ...! ........ ..,.._.11
23..0 GREtNc:lR!AK DR It:
CHULA VISTA CA 919J.5
!)953d28bO
..__~_Il I . ........u d-
23..1 GRE ENbR!A1< u H
(HULA VISTA LA 91915
r
~.()
-.0 )
>e C)
-.0:)
'eo
)0 )
Ie:::>
.')0 )
....
,~ ')
eo
)0 )
eo
)e J
.0
)0 ~
.0
5953211..&0
1ub" TOKR~Y PIN~S RU
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953211..b..
l-r
10 0 TORRtY PINtS RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59532Uitbb
'Lio. . -
3~8 GRE~N~OUO PL
80NITA CA 9!902
59532 Hit n
r . -
1040 TORR~Y PINES RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953212,00
LANE/KUHN PACIFI
900 LANt: AVi:
ChULA VIS A 9191..
5953212000
GENTRA ~APITAL CORP
114..0 W BERNARDU CT ,~OO
SAN DIEuO CA 92127
5953212b4.l
1000 bRuAUM~OK ~T 'U
(hULA V!STA CA 91915
59532121:145
- . -~
P 0 BUX 2b35
NATIONAL CITY CA 91~5.
5953212149
- . -.
2330 uREENBkIAR DR .e
eHULA VISTA eA 91915
5953212053
. J ....
23ltO (,R~ENBItIAR DR .
eHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953212857
Mf 'Il
GREENBRIAR DR IF
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
AI
~
~ES KO
CHULA VI)TA (A 91915
5953.:Uitii T
- ----
1054 TURkEY PINES RO
(HULA VI)TA CA 91915
'9532114ft9
~ I --. .,
.. TURkEY PINES RO
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
5953l119UO .
I'IASTERS l.OLLECTIUN AT t:ASTL.AKE
uREENS HuMEOWNERS ASSN
C/O LANE KUHN PACIFIC HO~ES
900 LANE AvE '200 .'
CHULA VISTA CA 9191it
5953.:123 liO
LANE/KUHN PACIF:
~oo LANE A 00
CHULA A CA 919.llt
.
CA 91915
"'\T
5953.:1l8'12
I _ "
1000 BRO~DMOUR CT .E
(HULA vl)TA CA 91915
59532128'10
r~ --
.lOOI BKO~DMOuR CT .0
eHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
5953212850
Iisl __. .._
,330 GREeNBRIAR DR
CHULA vI)TA LA 91915
595"1Z8~'t
-' .. . .--- ~. ..-
n.. l:lTH H
CORONAUO CA 9211b
1L
5953.: 1~858
~E
CHULA VI~TA CA 91911
?~U~~i. - lIf
.:3'11 GkE~N8RIAR OR t:
~HULA VI~TA LA 91915
.'
f'!A
.
(II
595321286f
! I _." _
2 31t5 uREEl\IBRI AR OK aA
eHU~A VISTA eA 91915
595.)iU167
-..--. -
3U ZENITIi ST '2
C "'U~ A V 1 ST A C A 919 11
)
595n12871
.. " -- "
2 Hit iloREEl\IBRJAR DR
C HULA V 1ST A eA 91915
)
)
HHfR2~fr .... "'Vh_
2350 t.REEl\IBkIAR OK U
e HUL.A V 1ST A eA 91915
)
)
5953212905
r II
9118 PAUl YALLI:Y eIR.A
eHULA VISTA CA 91915
)
,
i953212'109
9 Bit PALI'I "ALLEY cPl . A
C"'U~A VISTA eA cn91~
t
) 5953212913
9114 PALI'I VALLEY C I R ItI:
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
."
j
5953212917
no PALI'I VAL.LEY CIR .CJ
CHU~A VISTA CA 91915
'}
, ~ 1UUf~21 r
979 PALl'! VA~LI::Y C lR IE
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91915
.
.
5953212925
Il1R I
9 79 PAL 1'1 v AL. LEY C 1 R I A
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91915
i
595;;212929
~IAR OR .0
CHUL.A VISTA eA 91915
595321.3002
t(l'
NA 0
BSOS AVEL.~ANOS 160
B SOS DE LAS LOI'IAS
I'IEXIeU 11700 OF 00000
-
5953d28blt
TJ if'
23"5 GRE ENIlR!AR l) 'll
CHuLA VISTA CA 91915
5953d28b8
~._~-_. .
23"5 GREENbRIAR UR IF
CHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
59~3d2872
. [[\. _ I [ I -
23"1t GRE ENbR JAR OR '0
CHULA VISTA CA 919!5
5953il290f
~ - - n__
23~0 GREENllRIAK OR .ll
CHULA vISTA ~A 91915
5953d29U6
~. I _ ___ J
321t AI'IE~IA IS~ANO Ok
CHULA vISTA ~A 91915
5953.::12910
T I J
98" flAL'" VALL.Er CIk.8
CHULA VISTA ~A 919!5
5953d2911t
J - -- - .. . l~
98" PAUl VALLEY L R .F
CHULA VISTA CA 9!915
~toj9tB__
980 PAL.'" VALL.EY CIk .0
CHULA VISTA LA 9!915
i~:.~~:2922 .
97 ~ PAUl VAL LE Y (. I R .0
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
5953d2926
II _ L T' L
23bO GkEENbRIA~ OR 'A
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953c:l2930
I I
23bO E GkE~NbRIAK OR
CHULA VISTA L.A 91915
~,
5953<:13003
.". "n -~. . I U ~ ~. ~ "n. 'CI
2370 GkEENbRIDK OR .
CHuLA VISTA CA 91915
-
-
K
ao
0)
a~
. ...
ao
'0 )
a:>
'0 )
.. ~
.0
.. )
..
.. ~
.0
..
eg
5953212865
i J ) _ __._..._. -. -
2345 GR~ENBRIAR DR .C
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5~53212c6Y
~ - .. .....- ., .. -
234~ GREENBRIAR DR .A
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953212873
-_.- j ....-
23~4 ~REENBRIAR OR .E
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595 3212 ~O::l
I . iii ,-.. n . _... ~ I
2350 ~REENBkIAR OR"C~
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
59..3212907
V' '. __....,.__.
POBOX 211 oCt
FALLON NV 89407
'M
5953212911
F~IiI"ir' 1 I7G
9~4 PAL,., VALL~Y CIR 'L
CHULA VISTA CA ~191~
5953212915
_... . - - - .. . n _, .." & ~
~~O PALM VALLEY CIR 'A
CHULA VISTA CA Y1915
5953212'H9
980 PAL,., VALLEY CIR .~
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595-'212~2~
l ____ ___6_6'-' ft" __....~,
979 PALM VALLeY CIR 'L
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953212921
~ --'-
2360 ~REENBRIAR DR .B
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953212931
- -. . -eM) .
2360 (;RE RIAR DR .F
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
~
2370 (;REENBkIAR DR .0
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
_L
59532128b6 ,
.- - .-.
l3oCt5 GREtN~RIAR OR .0
LHULA VI~TA CA 91915
~9532128 70
~OR 'b
LHULA VISTA CA 91915
~95311,8 74
f ___
,3~oCt GkE~N~RIAR OR 'F
eHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
~953d 29 \/4
'to. ...- .. J
2350 GRE~NBRIAk OR '0
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
~95321,9l.8
III
988 PALM VALLEY elk .0
LHULA vI~TA CA 91915
~95321,9.l.2
~ -. .-
.. 00 G f< I fF IS R 0
....ILTUN FL j2~8j
i~~U~i9J.6 T'
980 PALM VALLEY eIR .B
CHuLA vI~TA eA 91915
59532129,0
11
979 PALM VALLEY CIR .F
eHuLA vI~TA eA 91915
~953d 29,,~
- ., - ft__"n "'"' _.... _ . _.. ..
979 "All" VALLE Y CI R .e
CHULA VI)TA LA 91915
5953,l1,9,8
I ._ ___.. .. n_"_ ___ .. I.
,l360 GREcNB~IAR DR 'L
CHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
.95Hlja~
.. ,II. D "''' ''-'"''
2370 GkEcNbRIAR DR 'A
LHULA VI~TA eA 91915
5953,l 130l.5
-... ..-
~70 ~OMEKSET CT .A
LHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
-
.
J
59532L300b
~r .. -.. ~. - - - -. -'" r J
SOMERSET CT 't;
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953d3007
~RSET CT .C
CHULA vISTA CA 91915
5953213010 -.~..~.. ~5~i130~ _
- - _.,--~ - A
P SC 01 BOX 573& ~71 SOI'lERSH CT /IF
A PO AA 34001 CH ULA VISTA CA 91915
59532130l't 5953,13015 - -. - _...Jl.-~
I . . .
971 SOl'lEPHT CT I(. ~71 )Of'lERSI;T CT .8
C HULA VISTA CA 'H 915 CHuLA VISTA CA 'H915
5953213018 5953d30n9 ..,. --
1: ,- -lor .1. _~
9 bO INDIAN PALI'I CT '8 960 IN 0 I AN P AU'S CT .C
C HUL A V 1ST A CA 91'115 CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213022 59,3Ll3023 ~.~"~......,,
1 1 -'
9 bl I;.. 0 IAN PALM CT .E 641) PALMER TON TEk
C HULA VISTA CA 91 '115 LANDUVER MU ,0785
5~5321302T 59,3d30,,7
. ...
901 IN 0 IAN PAUl CT rIA K 'A
C hULA VISTA CA ~1~15 \..A 9.1.915
5953213030 5953d3031
r 1.. y - r
380 uREEN8kI AR DR .0 2300 GkEENtlRIAk OR H
C HULA V 1ST A CA 91~15 CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213.200 L 5953"13ry --~..
~.....c ... ~ ~- . - .,.
C U wALTER "'~MT CD
C/O P~OFESSIONAL f'I GI'I T ASSN 2251 SAN DIE GO AVE . A-, 50
, 5897 UBERLIN OR '" 12 SAN 01 EGU CA 9,110
SAN DIE GO CA 92121
.
595321UNi
~ ~_. ~.- -
547 LA COSTA AvE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953-'1 3b Ult
-
25~5 LA CO~TA AVt
CHULA VISTA CA 9.915
t
)
i 9532\1lr~ _ _
410 E HILLSIDE 1<0 .577
LAREDO TX 700101
5953" 130 08
-J ... - _
P 0 tlOX 26Zr-
NATIU~L CiTY CA 91951
5 95~bH
t58 ACE RO PL
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
1953213&12
P U bO X b8 b
80NITA CA 919011
5953213703
Hh J !gSTA AVE
ChULA VISTA CA '11'115
5953il3701t
25,5 LA COSTA AV~
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
J
5953213008
I .W . _
970 SUMERSET CT 'D
CHULA VISTA CA 9191'
5~5j2n012
III
971 SOMERSET CT 'E
CHU~A VISTA CA 9191,
595321301b
~~~ 1- -
971 SOMERSET CT 'A
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953213020
;.;.II
P 0 BuX bH 7
CHULA VISTA CA
,9'3 <:: 130...9
w~ ~ - - - - - " _ p . ~. _ _.
'1 0 SOMEkSH CT IE
CHULA VI~TA LA 91915
,9,3l130 d
~
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
..
,953d30J.7
l-~~
~b~'A
(HULA vI~TA CA 91915
,953<::130d
- - ---- - ---
9bO INDIAN PALM CT 'E
(HULA VI~TA CA 91915
~ 1 90 ~
59532130Z"
- -
9b1 INDIAN PALMS CT 'L
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
~30U
- -
2380 vREENBkIAR DR .e
CHU~A VISTA CA 9191,
595 3Z13 03 "
b..05 S OAtTUN ST .104
ENGLE~OUO Cu ~0J.l1
5~53Z13001
CHULA VISTA CA 9191'
5953213b05
lr- ~
"3 LA CuSTA ~
(HULA VISTA (A 9191'
5953213b09 _
Ili.. _ .
2535 LA COSTA AVE
(HULA VISTA CA 91915
59532.1.3701
I . _
2531 LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213705
;;-23 U cuH A~ VE
CHULA VISTA CA '11915
,953" 130,5
~- I
~61 INUI~N PALM CT 'e
(HULA VI~TA CA 91915
'953':130..9
- I I m
"3ijO GkE~NBRIAR uR .e
CHULA VI~TA CA 9i915
,953.::1311.<0
,- - - I __
C/O KAkE~ BA~MER
11....0 w oEKNARUO CT '300
~AN DI~Gu CA 92127
,953d3buZ
~n - "'w~._..__-
~ ;URKEY PI~ES RD
CHULA VI)TA LA 91915
,9532130\10
~~..~ I _ __ ..._____w_ ..1
".. LA LOSTA AVE
(HULA VI~TA CA 91915
~q53l13b.l.O
f' r - - . T
,,3 LA ~OSTA AVE
(HULA VI)TA LA 91915
,953.:131\1Z
~
eHULA VI)TA CA 91915
,9,3l137ub
~'I - _.. __ _. r
" 5 21 L A La S T A A H
LHULA VI~TA CA 91915
-.
L
If
l
c
">
(
5953213 707
.- - - . - I L
ON THtLI'lA L
252b LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213801
~~r_. __"_"_~' _.._
2~ 9 LA CJSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA .,,1.,,15
5953213805
- . . -_..~~~
2511 LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~5~iH~~.._~~. __
2514 LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213901
~~~~L~-COSTA ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953213901
rij~ -' ~.~" -
4 LA COSTA AVE
C HU,-A VISTA CA 91915
59532.1.3909
H~r LA CJSTA AVE -- "
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953214807
~-M~r....
1 b OllREY PINtS RO
CHULA VISTA CA "'1915
595j2148it
I 0~1l TOR~EY-P iNES ~D
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953214815
~ft ~ , .-. - ~_
~ III I PERING ALMS L P
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953214927
1_..
2509 IIIIHISPEItING PALMS LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91.,,15
59532.1.4931
"I -- L -f~
2517 IIlH ISPE ItI NG PAL'" U P
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
-
5953,13708
m:. I< _ .n '1iIi.l.a
2524 LA COH A AY~
CHULA VISTA CA 9.1.915
L
5953.:13802
r-'- - " ..~
2517 LA COST A AVE
CHULA VISTA LA 9.1.915
5953.:13806
. __. _ __.._~_ _. _" A1:
2509 LA COSTA AVC
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
~953.:138.1.0
1. n. ~l"I
2512 LA COHA AH
CHULA VISTA LA 9.1.915
5953.:13902
!Yb~ ~A-COSTA AVt
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
5953il390b
---
2497 L A CO::; T A A Yt:
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
-....
5953d3910
~r -
500 LA t:OHA An
CHULA VISTA LA 9.1.915
11
5953.:14808
lill4 TORREY PI/'4ES KD
CHuLA VISTA CA 9~915
~953Ll't812
1076 YL~J~ kD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953d481b
2{:n WHISPERING PALl'IS LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953.:149,8
K__ .
2511 WHISPeRING PALl'IS LOUP
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
5953.:14932
- I r .. _"_'n_ ~
25.1.9 WHI SPeR IN\, PA Ll'IS L OP
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
'.
.0
.. )
...
..
.0
..
eg
595321.3 709
r" . ,
252l L.A cas TA A'i
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953213b03
I -- ....
2515 LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953213b07 J
.-- - ---- - ----
2518 LA COSTA AvE
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191~
? 95 321311 h _ 1 -
2510 L.A COSTA AVE
eHUL.A VISTA CA 91915
5953213'103
-~. 1 ....
2503 LA CUSTA AvE
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953213907
-.... 'r'''~
2~Ob LA CUSTA AV
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191,
595321391"'"
__ I
2~98 LA COSTA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595321~Cl09 fI
J .~ L.
1082 TOKR~Y PINES RU
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191,
~~~2~~A
107~ TORREY PINtS Ru
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191;
5953211t817
--
2534 IIHISPEw.ING PALMS lOOP
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191)
59532110929
r~ ._ __ ~.".., AYAUMU ,.
2513 IIlHISPEl<ING PAll'IS lOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953211t933
- .. ~ "' . - r
2521 WHISPEklt-tG PAUlS lUOP
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91915
5953,137...0
~< i" ~~.
~ L L. ~ AVe
lHUlA VI~TA LA 91915
,9,3,138 "It
II' ~"' .. "A
,513 lA ~OSTA AVE
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
;9,3i138,,8
r - - ~~n f ..
l51b LA L. VE
eHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
~95311.a~
. -, -" - - ..
~508 LA L.OSTA AVE
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
i!i.
,953l139"It
~AVI::
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
,.Pd39v8 .
,50lt lA L.OST A AVE -
CHULA vI~TA LA 91915
~3~~2
~CKl
~1t9b lA COSTA AVI::
eHUlA VI)TA CA 91915
'95321~8...0
- ~-
1080 TuRk j(D
eHUlA VI~TA LA 91915
-
~953d1t8!It ~
1072 TORKEY PINE~ RD
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
,953H~8 ...8
IN .dI
i532 WHbPERING PALI'IS LOOP
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
'iiii j 1 ~9 ~O
r _ _n. - . ~
i515 WHI~PERINu PALI'IS L
CHulA vI~TA CA 91915
595 3d ~9 ~It
I~~- 1m;- ~
2 23 wHI~PERI l.> PAll'IS
eHuLA VI~TA CA 91915
0"
~ .0 )
O'J
. ...~
OG
.0 ~
OJ
, ..)
.0"')
00
.. )
..
., ...
.0
)...>
.. .0
~~i2i~:))'L1L1ANA I
2 ~ 2 ~ III HIS PE Ii( I NG P A L1''1S L 00 P
ChULA VISTA CA 9191~
~iiO'
. _"..., . .~" ....--A
1(,9b TORREY PINES RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59 ~3.a..93b
..-. - _".... I '"_~""
25~7 WHISPERING PALMS LOOP
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
5953d500Z
1098 "TORREY p~J~A ~.. -
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
(9~3d5?~i.. _
10118 TORREY PINES RO
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
5953u.1~n _.....~._......" ...",_.~ ~Z -1
o ,5uO WHISPtRIN\> PALM~ I..~
Z50l ",HISPERING PAL"S lOOP CHULA VISTA LA 91915
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~15
?9532150~5
--
Z~05 IOIHISPERING PALMS LOOi>
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
S
r~Jr.UD(O v_Jf
2507 WHI~PtR1N\> PALM~ LOOP
CHuLA VISTA CA 91915
~lfn~
2835 CAMINu ~L kIu S .220
SAN UItGU LA 92108
~9,3d57U4
~r_< ~_.-
~ U AVI:
CORONADO CA ~211b
59'l,Hl1L...; ..., ..>~---
'''13 LA CO)TA AVI:
eHUlA VISTA LA 91915
r9~ij1571b ~
21tH LA C.ofIA AVi:
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
5953215900
LA NE I K uH N PAC I F I '
RTNEItSHIP N
C/U I:AST DI:V Cu
900 AVE '100
CH A VISTA CA 91914
5953, 1b1 d
rL . -
1010 BAY~OuD CIR .U
CHuLA VISTA CA 91915
595J2.lit937
_h_ . .. '_no ~J
252~ ~HISPEkING PAL~S LuOP
CMULA VISTA CA ~191,
5~53215003
~~'I TORRE.ynPlNtS vRi:i~ ..
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
595321501~
~66 ~HISPEKING PAL~S CuOP
CMULA VISTA CA 9191,
~jiU " _
2501 ..HISPEI<ING PALMS LUOP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953215.1.00
LANt/~UhN PACIF tS
900 LANe 00
CHULA A CA ~191"
5~5J2157OJ.
- .........-...u r".....'..' ...
2'112 LA CUSTA A~E
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
59532.1.5705
r- - - _ _
.'1 -
2'120 LA CuSTA A~E
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
595 3Z .1.5 70~
~28 LA COSTA-A~E
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
J
595~2~
2"15 LA CUSTA A~E
CMULA VISTA CA 91915
59532.1.5717
-~. ..-- ._.,-~
2'1 3 L A co S TA AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
59532.1.6UOO
8 -E 0 C 1 7 L P
c/o BkEHM CU TII:S
2635 (A DEL RIO S '~20
SAN 0 CA 92108
~.u
"-"'-v
010 ~AYWuOu LIR .C
CHULA VISTA CA ~191,
5953"H9,j8
- - .I!~': _.. .
2531 WHI~PERING PALMS LOOP
LHULA Vl)TA (A 91915
5953,,150Uit
11 - - . ......
.1.092 TURKEY PIN~S ~
(HULA Vl)TA LA 91915
5953,,150,0
~L"'S LOOP
(HULA VI)TA CA 91915
953.a50,4
,,503 WHI~PtRl ALMS LOOP
(HULA VI)TA CA 91915
,9531152 uO
LANE I K UH r. PAC I
~Oo LAN 100
(HU ~TA LA 919.1.it
~57~i
v ___
"itlit LA LOSTA AVt
LHULA VI)TA (A 9.1.915
59 53il5 7 i/6
-~ 1. .I.-_n.l..n.
"itU LA LOST A AVI:
CHULA VI)TA CA 9.1.915
~953~ 157.1.0
'..he ~ft~'D"LI 'To i
,,40 L
(.. H UL A V I :> TAL A 9.i. 9 15
-
~95311;7 .Lit
~n "fl!' . "jiI
,,417 LA L A
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
5953~ 157'"
~~H .......... - L
LA LOSTA AVE
(HuLA Vl~TA ~A 91915
,9532101.9
~'ft,.
010 BAy..OOD CIR IF
CHuLA Vl)TA CA 91915
5953d01 d
AI
"
"
-
-
,. e..,
10
... e)
.e
e~
.. .0
e.J
.g
Cl
-
-
5 <;53216 12it
1010 oAYWOOD CIR .A
C I1UL A V 1ST A C A 91 <; 15
II
;
5953Z1.b126
~..-- 'I
IlA YWaOD 1.1 . B
CHULA VISTA CA 91<;15
,
.
5 953216i03
~OitO bAYWJOD CIR IC
C HUL A V IS TA C A 91915
)
."
..,
5 9532lb 307
l _ __ _ " w....
1030 bAYIIIOOU CIR b
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
)I
5953216315
G ENlRA CAP I TAL C
C/O KAREN B
1 lit it 0 III AROU CT 1300
S AN 0 C A 92 12 7
5953Z.l.6itOO
G ~NTRA CAP ITAL /
C 10 KAREN
11ititO III NAKOU CT .300
S AN GO C A 92 12 7
5953Zl0800
EASTLAKE OE PI'IENT CO
900 LANE E .100
C HU LAS T A C A <; 1 '1 lit
59532,1200
E ASTLAKE )EVELOPI'I
9 00 LAN E A V E .
C HULA V 1ST
5 953U HOO
EASTLAKE )EVE tNT
900 LANE A 1100
CHULA V A CA 91'11it
5953Zl200()
PAY LESS DRUG
I NC
9275 Sill ON
W ILSO LE OR
59~3db125
1005 BAYWOUD CIR IE
CHULA VISTA CA 919~5
5953do129
1005 BAYWOUO CIR 'A b...
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.0
5953d b30it ) 0 ")
to"O BA~W~ C IR '0 4 .()
CHULA vISTA CA 91.915 ). ,")
_0
)0 )
_J
.IR 5953db308 .. )
T ~L
1030 BAY~OUD CIR 'A
CHULA VISTA LA 919.1.5
5953,lb3.1.b
GE NT d CAP I UR P
C/LJ KARE ALl'ltR
llititU tlEKNARUO CT .300
SA IEGO CA 9,127
5953,,20100
EASTLAKE O~VELUP U
900 LA NE A u
CH UL A A CA 9191it
5953L20900
EA5TLAKE OtVtLUP
90U LANE AV u
CHULA V \,A 91914
59~3a1300
PAYLESS DRUG STOkES NOkTHWEST
IN C
C/O THR I FT Y PA YU:S S
3it2it WILSHIRE tlLVD
LOS ANGELES LA 900.1.0
59 53L2 1700
PAY LESS DkUG STORES
IN C
<;275 Sw PEYTLJN LN
wILSuNVILLE UR 97070
~- .,
_0
.- )
.1>
). ~
NURTH.ES' _0
J. .J
;_0
5953.;001..I.l.O
S NORTHWES t J _~ .."...~_., w_ I
1051 WATER VILLE LAKE KD
LN CHULA VISTA CA 9!9.1.5
97070
-
5 95330~OO
- .1. M _".....~ _ _ _...
1.. AI'IATO
I'IISSIuN VIEJO CA 92b92
5 <;53_00
-II J __... _~..._..____
10b5 ..UER VI LLE LAKE RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953300500
r
1059 WATERVILLE LAKE RU
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
595 B009UO
. -i - - --
10b7 WATTR VILLE LAK~ kO
CH U LA V 1ST A CA 9 J. q 15
59532 lb 12b
100~ dAYWUDU CIR .0
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595321b301
1040 6AYWUDu CIw .A
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
17
595321b305
!f" - II
30 bAyWUOO CI~ 0
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~
11440 W B~R~AROU CT '~OU
SAN OIE~O CA 92127
5'15321b317
G~NTRA l.APIT
CIO KAR t LME R
114~0 ERNA~OU CT IJOO
SA IE~D CA ~21Z7
5953220200
~e
LOS ANGtL~S CA 90030
59532.21000
EASTLAKE DEvE..
900 LANE A
CHULA V A CA
5953221liOU
E AS T LA KED EVE LO P
900 LANe AVt
CHULA VI
co
59S3300~~i
I . _ _. __". .
1053 Iii A THV ILLE RU
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
595j300bOO
~.", . T IT
10b1 dTEW vIL.LE LAKE Flu
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953301000
T _"_ _ " ._,.~.
10b9 .ATERVIL..E LAKt KO
(HULA VISTA CA 91915
~953Ubld
~. J ~_. "~f=~~
11~40 W cERNARUO CT .300
)AN uIEGu eA 92127
5953d03v2
L.l. _ .._ "'_ II
10~0 BAY.DUO CIR 'B
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
~ . - . - n. W'- . .0
__.. ... W l. J
--
1030 BAY.DUO CIR Ie .0
l.HULA VI)TA CA 91915 n l. ..,
.<<>
~5rZl03 J,4 lO ")
-- ~ t .0
1020 BAYIlDOO CIR IE l. )
CHULA VI)TA l.A 91'HS
-
59532103.l.8
-
1020 BAYIlOUO CIR IA
CHULA VI~TA LA 91915
,953.2203 vO
EAST..A~E 0 MENT Cv
900 LA vE '100
CHUL I)TA CA 91914
,953c::21hO
EA STLAKE OEV
900 LANE 1100
CHULA A LA 91914
CU
~ ~."")
'.0
). ~
. '..,
J. )
..0
. 10.J
1.0
~q53,alqvO
EASlL.AKE Di:V
900 LANE '10u
CHUL ~TA LA 91914
~9 5 33003 uO
1 - - 1ilIil' 1 ...
.I.0~5 WATtlfvILLE LAKE RO
l.HULA vI)TA C~ 91915
.
595330U7uO
~E LAKE 1<.0
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
,9533011 uO
.IW . ~ 0 ~I' . -~ 'T""N D
1071 WATt VTLLE LAK ~
CHuLA VI)TA CA 91915
595H01200
r~~r ~~~~~ VI LlE'"~AKE' AD
CMULA VISTA (A 91~15
5 ~53301600
, -... rr
2301 SE SLAND PL.
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59533u200:>
11r . _. _.IL
2317 )EA ISLAIIlD PL
CMULA VISTA CA 91915
5 ~5J3021t00
! ~~It H A ISLAND pi:-MV- "-
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59533021:100
--
2295 HILT:JN HtAD kD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5'153303200
- _I __" . .
12Bb5 POINTE DEL MAR .200
DEL MAR CA n011t
5953303600
l _ _ _ .~ .
22BI:I HILTON HEAD kD
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
)
~
10611 wA TE~ V ILLE LAKE RD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
>>
.
595330itltOo
..I 1_ __ _. ..,.".....~ '"
2290 LOBB MEALlOIl PL
C HULA V 1ST A CA 91915
.
.
5115
DAVI N COSCAN
128b5 H
DEL "'AR CA
t
) ~~UltiiO~.."H.' '"~
1 u83 ",A TE~ V lLI..E LAKE RD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~
595H10bOO
_ r I 1 I
1091 nATERVILLE LAKE RD
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
5953~01300
S P- - T . __ _. _
1075 WATER~Il..Lt LAKE RD
CHULA VISTA LA 919L5
5953 JO 1700
Ltt~ · . -.... I
2 05 SEA ISLANu PL
(HULA vISTA LA 91915
5953302100
if ' ..
2316 SEA I ;)LANU PL
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595330i500
:h
3616 RANSOM PL
ALtXANDRIA VA ,230b
-
;95 BOl900
J _ ,~ -
2293 HILTON HEAD u
(HUL~ VISTA LA 91915
5953JO 3300
DA~luSON CuSCAN PART
12065 POINTE 0
DEl.. MAR ( Lit
1/,00
5953 jO 37 00
-'~. .~..
2290 HIL AD 0
(HuLA VISTA LA 91915
59;3j01t100
rl. - JIll
2295 COBd MEAD~W PL
(HULA ~ISTA LA 91915
595330 1t500
_. r. . _ ..
2294 COBb MEAD~W PI..
(HuLA VISTA LA 91915
TT
59 Olt'100
DA~lu (uS LAN PART~ERS
12065 PO DtL MAR .,00
DEL MAR CA 9
5953 j103 00
1._.. . ~ _ . _ . . -.. ~ _
--
10b5 WATER ~I I..Lt LAKE IHJ
(HULA VISTA CA 919L5
5953.)10700
v' '" '11I-".-
1093 WATERVII..LE LA~E RD
(HULA VISTA LA 9!915
- "'n. 4.
..
u
."
10 1
.,...,
I. ..
..,
1 Q ")
'.J
I. )
.~."")
).0
J. )
).e
J. ..
).0
..
).g
IlIl
5953301..00
1 - ~ -..
1077 w EkV!L~E RD
CHU~A ViSTA CA ~191~
5953301bOO 1 J
13 .'-"'__
2309 seA ISLAND PL
CHU~A VISTA CA 91915
595330Z,00 t
fti . ._~..,.
2 SEA I S~ANO PL
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
5953302000
It HI~ON
C HU L A V I S TA
_" ",""lC;),"u__,
HcA D 1(0
CA 9191~
~
~gHcAU KD
CHU~A VISTA CA ~1915
MAk .ZOO
595 3303 bO u
'W Al
229" HI~TUN HEAD 1(0
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
5<;53301t,OO
~ijB ~cAuOw PL
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
595330~oOO T
! - -" ..-
29b C088 "cAOO. PL
(HULA VISTA CA 9191~
5<;5 5000
DAV 10:> 1.0:lCAN
12805 PO
DEL "'AR CA 9
59533l0"00
L~~ _e_ !~I ~ ~
6~ LIVIN TRUSJ
1087 .ATEkViLLE LAKc kD
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59~330151./0
lA~9 WATtR Vr~~E LAKE kO
C HUL A V I :l T A C A 9 19 15
t313 SEA I)LANU PL
CHULA VI~TA l.A 91915
~0'3~i e_ ., __"........... _J
t30B SEA I)LANO PL
CHULA VI:lTA CA 91915
:1iTionvO
i297 HILION HEAD RO
l.HULA VI:iTA l.A 9i915
J
59
~289 HILION HEAO RU
l.HULA VI:iTA l.A 91915
~953jO.;51./0
~2blt HILION HIAO RU
CHuLA vI)TA CA 91915
~95HOj91./0
aU ~I~ 10N Hf.O RU
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
595330"31.10 ~
~lT
)AN DIEGu l.A 9d27
-
.Zllt
5q5330~7~O _
___ _1 _ _,L....._
1050 WATtR VILLE LAKE RO
l.HULA VI)TA CA 91915
~9533101uO
1081 WAleR VI ~LE ~AKE tu
CHULA VI:iTA CA 91915
,9533105UO _
"...___ I .
1089 ~ATtRVI~LE ~AKE RD
CHULA VI:iTA CA Q1915
5953310tlOO
l r r . ! - .
109, wATEkVILL LAKt KO
(HULA ViSTA CA 91~1~
595331091./0
~KE RU
(HULA VI)TA CA 91915
)
e"')
.0
) e>
am
e)
-.0
'. .>
.0
5953311000
~h" C RYSTAL"o5;;N~YDR "- '"
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953 H ~4tOQ
----- --
1109 CRYSTAL OO~NS OR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~ 953311800 ,
1125 CRYSTAL. DO~NS DR
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91~15
5953312200
~lU CR YST AL UOilNS DR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5953312bOO
DAVID~Oh CDSCA
128b5 POINT L
DEL MAR 92 o lit
5953313000
-
1173 eR YSTAL uOwNS DR
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91~15
5 95H! 31t00
DAVID:.ON COSCA
U8b5 POINT L
DEL MAR 42011t
5953313tlOO
~.- n
o AMELIA
(hUL.A VISTA
. _ _ _ n, ". . L. . _.A
I SLANU DR
CA 91915
5<;53U~2D.O .
rl_ .._..._...~~ ",,,"L.'''' P
23210 A "'Ell A I ~LAND DR
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91915
595331>>.ii
- .. _.n~"'" B
1 u91t flA TEll V lLLE RU
CHULA VISTA CA 9hl;
.
~ 59533151t00
;953jl1100
- _ I J "_
".,..
1100 CRYSTAL DOWNS Ok
CHuLA vl~TA CA 91915
59,3~11500
K - 11IM , - ""q
1113 ms AL DUWNS DR
CHULA vISTA L.A 9J.915
5953311900
- .~ .~
1129 CRYSTAL uWNS OR
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
595B12300
'11'15 CRYSTAL DUWNS iI\P
CHULA VISTA \.A 9!915
5953312700
IIf _
I1bl CRYSTAL DLWNS Ok
CH UL A V I ST A lA 'I! 9 15
~J1~eHlit .
1172 CRYSTAL DUWNS OR
LHuLA V I ST A \.A 91915
59'3~13500
l' .
2352 A"'EL.IA !SL.AND OR
CH u L A V 1ST A CA 'I! 9 15
5953~13900
W _ _ _ _ - -.. -, .. - - .. - -
233b AMELIA ISLAND OR
CHULA VISTA LA 9!915
5iii1i It 3 ii
v _' _
23,0 AMELIA ISLAND DR
CHULA VISTA CA 9l,915
59!( 314700
~ -~
P (J tlO X 67 n..
SAN ulEGp LA 9,136
-
59,3~15100
113b C k
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
5953J155o.0
2~53 A/'IELIA ISL.~ OR
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
--- ~
.IL
en
t.
...,
t.
.a
to
....,
..
-
>>e ")
.0
.. ")
..
..
eo
..
eg
5953311200
"oft _ _....._ _
1101 eRYSTA~ UOwNS uR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953311bOO
__ _ -_'AtA
1117 eRYSTA~ UOwNS UR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953312000
~_. ~J
rl~RYSTAL uOwNS uR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
(i53312.,00 _
11~9 CRYSTAL DOwNS br---
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
59533!ZIlOu
DAVIDSON CO~CAN
12805 PuIt'jT L
DEL MAR 201.,
59533.1.3200
~ -
11611 CRYSTA~ OOwNS UR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595ir13bOO
51 J
Z3~1l AMeLIA ISLANu uR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595 J31lt uOO
'-
2332 AMeLIA ISLAND uR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5 95 33.~~.o.Q
~ : : ",,,-,,~v'JR . .
16~0 wATEkVILLE LAK~ kD
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
595331400W
~8 wi TEI<V IL.~E -ii Ow'" - ..
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5953315,00
~Y'TAL UOWNS uR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
59533.1.5bOO
~3 AMeLlA ISLA~
ChULA VISTA CA 9191S
S9S3J1l3uO
r~'-"_rA .
1105 CKY~TAL DOWNS DR
CHULA VISTA eA 91915
~9S33117,,0
uAVIuSON coseAN P
12116S PO IN
DEL 1'1 9Z014
ARTNERS
MAR 'ZOo
S9S331,,5vO
r - - A. r~ . ....
11S3 CRY~TAL DOWN R
(HULA VISTA LA 91915
595331291.10
M' ~ - .
11b9 CkY) AL Duwf'oS Ok
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~9 ~33 U3vO
~lb~ CKYS~OW"'S of
lHULA vISTA CA 9.1.915
~9~33137uO
I - -. --- -
d"" AI'IEdA ISLAND OK
CHULA VI~TA CA 9.1.915
~953JHlI.10
..~l!I_. 1 ....
2328 AMELIA ISLANIJl)k
lHULA vISTA CA 9i9.!.5
~9S331"5uO _
I' -
. i09Z WAT~ VILL~ LAKE RD
eHULA VISTA eA 9i915
~9533hCh.O 4-
I ~ _. __ ..,
i 8 CKYsTAL OQWt'4S 011.
lHULA VIsTA CA.91915
;953H53vO
1\~'1 Af'lE LI to I SLA NO 0 R
(HULA vISTA ~A 91915
;95331571.10
1- 8"1'" .- ,]7
232 Mt...1A I SLA NO DR
eHuLA vI)TA LA 91915
T
'.0
.. )
l.'"
.. 1t
).0
.0 ")
. ). ~
). )
-
.,. "')
, ).0
.. )
>.e)
, ...
>eo
..
- ).0
5 9533J. 5800
1 ):r~l'lm A I SLA".H! Ol'E
CHULA VISTA CA 9H15
.....Q01t03
103~ LAGUNA S~fA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~15
5 951t 30 0 1t07
101t3 LAGUNA S ~C A LOOP
ChULA VISTA CA 91915
~951t3001tll
All _ ~ . n_ . .L
1051 LAGUNA SECA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA ~h15
"j1fij~R~v_.._.D" n
1059 LAGUNA SECA LOOP
ChULA VISTA CA 91~1~
5951t30090i
~ ~ - ., ..~ -- - -
~ - 1
Z AvE""IOA DEL 'ilAR '201t
S AN CLEMENTE CA 9~b7Z
5 ~5.. 30 BOa
CHAMPIONSHI P
AKE GREENS H
Z C9 AVENIO
SAN CL E TE
SAT I;A S T ,
NERS ASSN
EL MAR '20..
CA 9lb7Z
595..301701
"i\l
10Z0 LAGUNA SI:CA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 'f1'H5
5 '15" 3~ i Ii5 _.p
L OZ" LAGUNA SECA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
595..301709
ill' _. . ~.....J L
I""D71$ LAGUNA S EC A LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
~
595.. 30 1-&if l
'OItb LAGUNA S EC A LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~1807 (
1065 LAGUN~ H~A LOOP"'.......
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
59~";;00100
i I Or
i09 AVENIDA tEL MAl( .20lt
SAN CLEMENTE CA 9Z07i
59 ~It ;lOOlt Olt
I . - - ......
1037 LAGUNA SECA LU~
(HULA VISTA LA 91915
~
_~... ~'V"
".
10..5 LAGUNA SECA LUOP
CHULA VISTA LA 9J.915
5951t.;00501
1053 LAGuNA sEl:A iuop
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
595ltJ005u5
~p
CHuLA VISTA LA 9~915
n
-
t .'"\
a
~ 'J4:'~
In
o
. -)
o
59,'..;010UO
_ CHAMPIONSHIP CLASS T EASTl
AK ~ l.REE lIi5 HuM ER S ..5 SN
~0'1 AV~NID I. MAk .20"
SAN C TE CA 9Z072
59~";;OlltOO
CHAMPIONsHIP
AKE l>REElIiS
l09 AVE UEL
SAN C ENTE CA
Cs AT EASTl
looNERS ~SSN
I'1AI< .Zu"
92072
595" J01702
L .- "'~'" _
1021 LAGUNA SEeA LUOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595"';01706
Jl _.
~ LAGUNA sELA LUOP
(HULA VISTA CA 919~5
59,,,,01710
~4. I i _T
1029 LACUNA SECA LuOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954J01801t
11 . ..... .... "-y
1000 LAG UNA SE CA LOID
(HuLA vISTA LA 91915
,9
It" tl SM OK Y Ll k
CHULA VISTA LA 91910
.
.0
. ")
IG
..
.0
'L.
iO
I
595..300..01
rt=.-c
1 I LA(;UNA
CHULA V ISlA
_I
SECA L.OUP
CA 'H9B
595..300"O~
~ ... _, n...."'. '"
1039 LA(;UNA SECA LOUP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5~5"300"09
U . _ __
1047 L.A(iUNA SECA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
~50Z
1055 LA(;UNA SECA LOUP
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595"300500
~ "~i
44S SMOKY ClR
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91~lv
595..301100
PARCEL ~ TWENTY
209 AVEI';lliA
SAN CL.EM ('A
595..301~OU
EASTLAKE DE ~MENT ~O
9CO L.ANE ~ 1100
CHULA TA CA 9191..
595..301703
-
1022 LAGUNA SECA LOOP
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91~1~
5954301707
- ,'-
1020 LAdJU 'Hd LOOP
ehUL.A VISTA CA 9191~
595..301601
AT __... .1'
107~ L.A(;UNA SECA LOOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
595..301b05
lObi L
CHUL.A VISTA CA 9191~
595..30h09
~!I ~u"'UEL 8
1 67 LA A SECA LOUP
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~1'
,9543004VZ
~ACl"NA
CHULA VI~TA
LI
SEO LOOP
eA 91915
~95"3004lJ6
10.,1 LACvNA HCA L6!II-
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
I
..n~,004~0
10.,9 LACuNA SECA LUOP
CHuLA vI~TA eA 91915
iU!3~~jr v, __ .. _
1057 LAGuNA SEeA LUOP
\..HULA VI~TA CA 91915
,9;430US\;0
PAkCI:L R T",EI'4T
i09 AYl:N
~AN I.. <:NTE CA
~9'''::1012lJO
L P (.HAMPION~HIP rcs
~KE (iREE uMEOlOlNER S AS SN
i09 A !OA DEL MAk .Z04
~A L.EMtNTE CA ~207i
~9 ;4.jOH>vO
tASTLAKE DEVE cu
900 LANE uoo
CHULA TA CA 91914
,95"30171.1"
11 . '-n~
10,3 LAGuNA SECA L~
CHULA VI~TA CA 9i915
J
,95" 3 0 1 7 V S
- ,
lOi LAG~NA ~ECA LOOP
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
R954301SuZ _
1077 LAGlJNA SEeA LOOP
LHULA VI~TA C~ 91915
595430iS ub
~_... - -.
100" AClJNl SECA LOOP
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
;95"jO.w
.. ----
iOeS LAG\;NA SECA LuOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
L. P
- Jl.
--L
. r"l
Q )
. .,
. >>
) .0
o
.'
o
'....,
.n
) .. )
.0
.. >>
.'J
..
eQ
5954t301811
CHULA VISTA CA
) 5954t400100
~ , - ~r CI~
ZZ8tl Ii LLOW EK
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
)
t 5954400500
rL r CREEK CIR
Z Z80 III I LOW
Ct1ULA VISTA CA 91915
-
) 5'154t4t~ - ,
-~.- '"
ZZ72 ..ILLJW CREEK CIR
C HUL A V 1ST A C A 9191 ~
)
Wi4jRHOi --- . .---
2 2blt .. I LLO W CkE~K CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954t30181Z
IiIiI ..
1010 L AGlJN"A SECA LuOP
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~9544t00200
ZZob WILL~1Il C~EEK ell "
CHuLA VISTA eA 9!9!5
5954'100bOO
t~78 WILLOIll tREEK Cllt
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595'1100 !OOO
I "
ZZ 70 W ILLOIll eRt:EK CIK
CHuLA vISTA LA 91915
--. .
-
59541001400
. ~ -- -
LZbZ PEACHTR~E CIR
CHULA VISTA LA 9~915
5 954t40 1700 --..-.. ..... N" r.
-- 2254 PEACHTRtE CIR
Z 25b PEACHTkEE ell( CHULA vISTA CA 91915
C HUL A VIS T A C A 91915
595'140Z100 ~ 59~44t02Z00
h4t! P~CIR 14'1b PE~CHTHE C IR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915 CHULA VISTA LA 9!915
595'14tOZ500 5954t1002buO
Jnn~~tl[~k - ~R
C hULA VISTA CA 91915 CHULA VISTA eA 919~5
l 5954t40Z900 59541003000
Z 23L ~~~ An elk - 11- . T_
C HULA V ISlA CA 91cn5 2Z30 PEACHTREE CIR
;J CHULA viSTA CA 91915
.. 5954403300 _400
1!~ ..... J.. - -
2224t Pc H R E CIl(
CI"ULA VISTA CA 1011915 2Z.lZ PEACHTREE CIR
CHULA v1STA LA 91915
595'1403700 59541o~OO
~ - CREEK hI'
CIR zz 14 W ILLOIOl
C HUI.A V 1ST A CA 91915 CHULA VISTA CA 9! 9 15
59510404100 -- 595440'lZOO
Htll lilmW CREEl< elR ....
C HUL A V 1ST A CA 91915 CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
5954301813 ~.l.4
~ - ._~ ... .1.073 LAG \;NA SEeA LUOP -I~
x U1..77 eHULA VIHA CA 919.15
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
595""Wilii 59 51t1t 001t vO
f_ _ ..... ..,........._ ~211J WILLOW CREEK CHt --LI
2281t wILLOW CKEEK CIIl
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~15 CHuLA V I H A CA 91915
5951t1t0iiOW 5951t..008vO """ .~
---,. ~... . A ~ 1 ~ o )
227b wILLOW CkEEK CIR ~Z7" WiLL ill CREEk CIk 8:l
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915 eHuLA VI~TA eA 91915
1 ,e .")
.0
10 ")
51itili?j - 5951t'1012\;0 .'J
- - .f!. . . -A 10 )
22611 wILLOW CI<EEK CIR Ubb WILLO", eRHK elk
CHULA VISTA CA 'tl91~ eHULA v I HA CA 91915
....
5951t1t01500
--~- .__,.. w, ..~". .~
22bO PEACHTKEE elk
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
595"'101.6 vO
~~r . - . -. I - - "
8 PEA~HTREE CIR
eHULA VI)TA eA 91915
595..1t01900
- ~'!f .
2252 PEA HTk eIR
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~15
~951t"O.::OvO
/
22~0 PEAl.HTREE CIR
CHULA vI)TA CA 91915
5'15'11t02 JOO
~ i- ~ - J I
lit.. PEACHTkEE CII<
CHULA ViSTA CA '11'11~
59~1t"0,ltuO
595""WZ100
..."" -,. -,...
'23b PEACHTkEE Clk
CHULA ViSTA CA '11~1~
~ ~951t"iMuO
,231t peA~HTREE CIIl
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
Ji.1L
~95'11t03100
, ---- . -' ..... .J
2228 PEACHTKEE eIR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
~9~It"032vO
. - - - - ,,-
2226 PEACH IlEE CiR
eHULA VI)TA eA 91915
-. ~..,
.eo
I. )
., lee
.. )
>>.0
f- ).:J
).0
595..1t0~
.....- . -. --
2220 PEACHTkEE eIR
CHULA VISTA CA ~1915
,951t'lOjbvO
5 951t1t03 900
~2-W~~W CREEK CiR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
5951t1t0"OuO
~CREEK elk
eHULA VI~TA eA 91915
5951t1t01t300
1 - -
20lt ",ILLuw CREEK CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
59 51t1t0"1t 1.10
iT
,202 WIL~Ow CREEK elk
CHuLA VI~TA eA 91915
~ ~51t4p j <'RBl -. -''''- ._ 5 595....0..bOO . -
.--- J
2107 ..ILLOW CREEK CIR 2205 WILLO. CR EE K C I k
CHUlA VISTA CA 91~15 CHULA ~ISTA (.1. 9.1.915
~ 595..404900 5954..05000
-- ,.~.
iii EEK CIR 220 iii CREEK elk
C HUL A VIS T A CA 91915 CHULA VISTA ('A 91915
.
.'
! 5951t405iiP 59544t0~ii ').0
H~! II I lLO W- CRE EK CjR --" ....."-- ~O J
2273 WILLa. CREEK elk >.0
C HUl A V 1ST A C A 91 ~ 1S CHULA VISTA (.A 91915
~ ~. .")
l.e
)0 )
i 5954405700 595....05800 -- W" ).0
- ~ T :}O )
1075 F AI( E U R 1077 FORE:ST lAI<.E 01(
CHUlA VISTA CA 91915 CHUL A V 1ST A CA 919.1.5
5954 4(ib 100 --_.-._-- in....Ob200
I - . - J
1C83 FOREST LAKE: UR 1085 FORES T lAr.E Ok
CHUlA VISTA CA 91915 CH U L A V 1ST A (;A 9.1.915
.. ,,-_. ~ ~ _. fl954"ObbOO . ~
-
10'13 FOREST L.AKE Ok
CH UlA ~ 1ST A LA 9.1.915
59544Ub900
~tr t-~hs T LAKt: UR" ..
C hULA V 1ST A CA 91915
5954..07000
r .
1092 FORI:ST LAKE 01( -
CHULA ~ISTA (.1. 9.1.915
5 95j4U 7300 .
L _ . _ _ ._
1C8b FOREST LAKE UR
C Hl)LA V 1ST A CA 91915
S9 54..07.. 00
,.. ~ ~ .
10tl4 FO E T L.AI<.E DR
CHULA VISTA (.1. 91915
.
5 ~5440 7700
LI I
22"9 PEACHTREE eIIt
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954ltYlfiO
22..7 P EAeHTR I:E trR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
-
)~e'
~.O
) )e ")
~.t)
) l.'.
~.O
)"). .>
~.O
)954408100
- r..r- ,. .
2 241 PEA H E C R
CHULA VISTA CA 91'115
595....08200
T'''' . LI -
239 P EACHTR I:E CjR
CHULA VIST4 (.1. 9.1.915
-
.&.
595..408500
'. b-+m'-
2225 PEArt CIIi.
C HUL A V j S T A C A 91 9 15
595" ..OMUlO
_IIIIIIIII' _. - _
2223 PEACHTRI:E CjR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
b "30200300
'81r ~
, a 0 T EST. .j0 0
S AN 0 IE (,0 C A 92121
b430.:00800
!7 -.---.---
0595 JAMA CHA KOAD
SPkING VALL.EY, CA 9207l:l
595....04700
H~! ~Q[1~w CIl.EEK cip II.
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954405100
r-' - .._ ..l.~ .- ..
2285 wILLOW CKEEK CJR
CHULA VJSTA CA 91915
5954405500
2271 WILLOW CREEK CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954405"'00
~ J
1079 FOREST LAK~ DR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595..40b-,00
~I~-FOREST LAKE OR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
~"jnnlii
1098 FOKEST LAKE DR
CHULA VISTA CA "'1"'15
5<;5....07.1.01.1
1090 FORES' ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595"407'00
. - <>
1082 FOKEST L~KE OR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
595"41.17"'00
;;;5"pIA~h~!eE C IR .f
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
595..408 jOO
T .~
2229 PEACHTREE
CHULA VJSTA CA "'1915
595..408700
EASTLAKE DEvE LO
900 LANt .100
CHU TA CA 9191"
10811 HALE AH
IRVINE CA 9~714
,954" 0..8 ",0
-
- . -
~201 WIL~Ow CREEK CIR
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
59,4..052vO
L . . J
2277 WILLOW CREEK CIR
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
5954405b",0
I . ..-. . - . ,
22b9 WIL~Ow CREEK CIR
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
,95440bO,",0
!081 FURtST LAKE OK
CHULA vI)TA CA 91915
'95....0b4vO
t089 FURtlT LAKE DR
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
,954..008vO
~Oqb FORtST LAKE DR h
CHULA vISTA CA 91915
~9 54..0 fZ ",0
.. . -
385 CANYuN RIDGE DR
~ONITA C.. '11"'02
,9544070",0
T~
2~lR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
5954..080vO
2Z"~ ~I:L.HTR EE C IR
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
6qi4Hlj~. .. ~ _. ~ ..
2221 PEALHTREE CIIl
CHULA VIsTA CA 91915
,951t..08800
EASTLAKE Dt
900 LA 0
CHU A CA 91911t
b43020!3vO /~
UTAY WAT~~TllICT
.I.053.~/JA1'flCHA ROAD
)"1fJ-N~/VALLEY. CA "'20711
....
-'
lL
.IiII
\
0-'
.0
, .)
.e
eJ
f- .0
I.
e- eo
L P
LE hU ST
b "30301500
E ASTLAKE JE VE L T CO
9 00 LAN E A V 100
CHUL.A VI CA 9191"
o "309(JO~0
- - ~ . " -~. ..
2353 liAY 'iILL RO
CHUL.A VISTA CA 1;1'115
b"30,02500
OTAY WATER
C/U llALDIOII ILDEII.S
11975 E AMINO REAL .,00
SAN 0 ~A 9,130
blt30,03100
BLACK EMIL Y
CI U liE STER N
1220 HAD
SA Nul ~A
blt30,03600
EASTL.AKE Dtvc
C/O _ILLIA TREM
'100 L.AN VE 'LOO
CHUL ISTA CA 91911t
61t 3020 "0 00
UTA~I~AU~~
PUBL/-CY
bit 30301100
EASTL.A",E Dl:HL Cu
900 ..ANE A
CHULA V A CA
blt30~00200
~ .or~ III
23"9 BAY HILL. KD
CHuLA vISTA CA 9L915
b"30'100600
I ~ ~Y~'3 BA; ~l~L kD -
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
b 1t3U900900
J - -.
321 DAY HILL R[J
CHU..A VISTA CA 91915
.
. O"309~ -
~ - --
30~ liAY HILL RD
CHULA VISTA CA '11915
>>
. 0..30901700
, . "-ffl
1 200 HAL U N [) 0
C MULA VISTA CA 91915
.
t 0..30902100 - .." I..... ._
1221t HALF !'lUON I:lA Y DR
C HUL A V 1ST A C A 91915
!ltrti'1ij-OOO r
2317 BAY HILL. 11.0
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
bit 30'10 lit 00
IL 'IWWI.I~~H' ro. ..
Z 3 0 1 BAY"R"'I't"'t'""
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
o~O
........ j r ,," T,
1212 HALf MOUN BAY
CHULA VISTA ~A 919L5
bit 30'10aOO
12.;3 OISCbi"kkY BA; Ok ."0
CHuLA VISTA CA 9L915
TRuST
"'.
..0
..
>>..
..
>>.0
..
).g
\? 61t30Z0ZbOO
OTA Y d TEll
C/O BALOW uILDERS
11975 CAMINO REAL .200
SA E~O CA 92130
S L P
6 't3 OZ Olt J.OO
EASTLAkE vE~E T ~O
C/O WILLI T~EM
900 LA AVE '100
ChUL lSTA CA ~191~
b1t307uO.;OO
BALDWIN BuILDERS
C/O BAllJWIN ClI
500 NEWPOkT CENTER uR '700
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92060
blt30900309
Z31t5 bAY HILL Ro
ChULA V1STA CA ~1~1,
blt30900700
MY . . -
329 bAY hILL RU
CHULA V1STA CA 9191,
b~30q01l00
!JI! ~AY HILL RD
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
t~U~W"_J _. ".~.~T
1200 HALF MOON DAy UR
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
6H090l't00
~r-""pl'- r ._u _.
-
1210 HALF MOON DAY uR
CHULA V1STA CA ~1915
61t30902300
-
1229 oI~CUVERY DAY liR
CHULA V1STA CA 91915
b4302027uO
lITAY WATt.R
C/O bALD
J.197 CAMiNO REAL '200
lEG u CA
blt30i033uO
)AN DIEGu COU
TV
C/O b IN DUILDERS
!19 EL CAM1NO REAL '~OO
SA oIEGu CA 92130
co
9l11Z
C
nuz
0ltJ07004vO
I:l L AC I< E"'.i L Y h
LID _EST LT CO
7Z20 uE ST .300
)A lEG... CA 9,121
t TRUST
blt309004uO
~n . r[a~
, AY HI L R
CHULA VI)TA LA 91915
b430~008uO
p -
l3t5 BAY H1LL kD
~HULA vISTA CA 91915
0430901ZuO
W1IUlli . - U" "-4]
Z309 BAY HILL'RD
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
0430901buO
IZo4 HAL~u~U~~AY Ok
CHULA vISTA CA 91915
.,.3090Z0uR _
J.Z20 HALf MOuN BAY OR
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
p
04j09024uO
11' ovlU"i I
lZ25 OISL AT tR
LHULA VI)TA CA 91915
,
, ,
l
b ..30902500
, r'~
3"0 tl A H LL R IJ
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.
1
~..3090"900
E IoSnAKE II CUMf'1U
C/O FIELDSTUN r.MuNITIE~
5..b5 MOII.EH l: DR 11250
S AN 01 C A If 2 12 1
,) ~It~i L
1240 HALF ''lOON dA Y OR
C t1UL A V IS TA C A If1 If15
"
f
J ~Yi F
Z JOO SPAN ISH oA Y R 0
CHULA VISTA CA 91'115
.
.~ t "3U911~ii l 11
105b C AUlA DR
C hUL. A V 1ST A C A 91910
~
...
b -.)09.1.1000
f!t: JANISH bAY 11.0
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
'''30912000 ~
Z3411 :>PANISH bAY RD
Ct-,UL./I VISTA CA 91'115
0" 30'10~bOO
- -
23.... BAY HILL. KD
CHuLA VISTA CA 9~915
&3000
~220 OISCO~EII.Y BAY DR
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
~O '103" 00
1229 BODEGA bAY UR
CHULA vISTA LA 919.1.5
0" 30lfO 36 00
~oR
CHULA vISTA LA 9.1.915
0430'10..200
. - -'''.I''T6 I>
1Z,," Ba1JEGA IlAY u~ ..,..__
CHuLA vISTA ~A 919.1.5
0" JO..,O"bOO
1fl-1 ~ HAL F MOUN ~ lQ ~r -h
CH U L A V 1ST A ~A 919.1. 5
f430'110100
INL 12,,8 HALF MOUN BAY OK
CHuLA VISTA ~A 9.1.9.1.5
0"'30'110500
". - ....
12..4 HALF MOuN BAY 011.
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
olt 30'11IJ900
-. - ~
230'" PANlsH BAY Ru
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
b'" 30'1113 00
~20 SPANISH BAY Ro
CHULA VIST~ CA 919.1.5
0"'30lf11700
~U
CHuLA VISTA LA 91915
b"'30lf12100
JHZ sPAN-!!PIn (~-
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
-~
r
,.Cl
10 )
).~
I. .")
).0
10 )
l. :>
l. )
"b'
".")
).0
). )
).~
). )
).0
). .>
.>.0
-r
0~3090Z70i
-_ _ ._..L.....
2348 ~AY HILL RD
CHULA VISTA CA ~191~
0430'10'8~0
- -. --.- .-
i 3 52 BAY HI L L II. 0
LHULA VI~TA LA 9l9l5
0430'iOHuO
. _.f...._A
uNiTIES j..,( a,8 OIs\'.OvEkY BAY OK
LHULA VI)TA CA 91915
043091.13 )01.1
I
1,25 ~ODEGA BAY OR
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~1)
0..31.1903-;01.1
t'r ..l._ -.
. ; 17 i l:lODEGA BAY 011.
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
0"3090~noi
~ bOlJEI.A
CHULA VISTA
r. _
BAY DR
CA 91915
0~3U9~4 700
~13 HALF MUON bAY uR
ChULA VISTA CA '1191,
043l19.1.0iOO
~lJR
CHULA VISTA CA ~191,
0431.1910000
A Y UR
~1915
~"309l1UOO
23do ~iANISH bAY kO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
b43C91HOO
~4 SPANISH bAY RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
234\l SPANISH 8AY RO
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
b430912,,00
2350 )PANISH bAY kO
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
o430903buO
~ ~i1- --L
d uO tG A !lA Y OR
CHUlA VI:>TA CA 9.1.915
1
0~3090"OuO
I 121b BUOtGA lilN
LHULA vl:>TA CA Cll9..:'
J ?,4 30901\ 1.10 r
12,5 HAL to MOON BAY 011.
CHULA vbTA CA Cl19l'5
043090..81.10
. .~ ~
.1.209 HAL to MOUN flAY 011.
C H Ul A Y I :> TA LA 91915
~ui Ln Ok
123b HAL I- MOUN
CHULA vI:>TA CA Cl.l.915
0~30~1u71J0
r ~.. - - . .
1252 HAL to MOU AY 0,,4
CHULA YI~TA CA 91915 ."
.
.0
.
043091UuO . .0
~RD 0
CHULA YI~TA CA 91915 IQ
04309115\10
0430'i1l9uO
~344 SP~~J~H BAY ~b
CHuLA VI:>TA CA 91915
-
-
1
043091Z3,,0
- r~ -
,30 PAhISH BAY RO
LHULA VI)TA LA Cl1915
6..3u91Z"OO
-~
Z 65 ~PANISH bAY ~O
C hULA V 1ST A CA 91915
.-
.
6"3091Z000
, ~t~. ~ u.~
PANI H ~AY RO~
CMULA VISTA CA 91915
)
6"30913Z00
1<-[ _
~O DISCOVERY
C hUL A V 1ST A C A
_ _. _. _.. V~ _. _"
BAY DR
91915
)
)
b"30913600
fZ"1 ~l~ All. -
CHULA VISTA CA 91'115
)
>>
b "3091"000
~3b bODEuA BAY O~
ChULA VISTA CA 91915
b..309H"00
~45 HALF MUON dAY DR
ChULA VISTA CA 91'115
b "3091"600
._ 1-
1~Z9 HALF MUON BAY OR
C....ULA VISTA CA 91915
6..3J.OOO..00
PARCEL R-Z../R-B
I P
2 09 Av E t..1 DAD ELM
SAN CLEI'IENTE
6..31000600
PARCEL R-Z"/R-
2 09 A'/ENIDA
SAN CLE E CA
b "31001200
CHAI'IPI0NSri[P CLASSI
hE GlI. EENS HO,.,EO
C/O CU TrACE 0
Z (.9 hENI EL MAR '20"
SAN CL TE CA 9Z672
b"31001600
PARCEL R-Z../R-25 L
2 C9 AvEIliIOA DEL IIZO..
SAN CLEl'IENTE 92672
6..31100100
FIELDSTONE COMMU
5 "65 1'I0REHOU
S AN O! E (,0
b"30'11Z500
I
Z301 SPANISH BAY RO
CHULA VISTA LA 919J.5
0"30'112900
~ 1- -. A
1Z..1 OISCOVEkY BAY k
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
b.. 30'1133 00
-
12..4 DISCOVERY BAY DR
CHULA VISTA ~A 91915
~
12 H BUOECA bA Y liR
CHUL.. VI ST A CA 91915
b"J0'11"100
B4~ ~(~r~~y 'u"
CHULA VISTA LA 9!915
0430.,1..500
! . r,' ..
2..1 HAL /'I AY Ok
CHULA VIST~ CA 91915
0431000100
b431000500
51 PAkCtL R-2"/k-Z5
ER;)HIP
209 AVEN 10
SA iii CL E
b4 3100 1300
PAkCi;L R-2 "/~-25
ERSHIP
Z09 AVENI EL /'IAR .ZO"
SAN CL CA 9Z072
0431u01700
PARCtL R-Z../k-25
20'1 AVENIOA DE k .204
SAN CLEMEN A 92672
ru
'.0
.0 )
le~
)e.~
leG
.0 )
)e::>
.-,. )
-l
o PAR H
0430913000
. l ..
1237 UISCUVE Y bAY uR
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
04309131400
_t
E II u
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
014309131100
PI h._.
1541 PETE~lYNN U
SAN DIEuO CA 92154
olo309J.Io ,,00
i~44 !lOUEuA aly OR
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
~1iOY
1237 HALF MUON BAY L/R
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
R
b43091,,7UO
. - '" . I
,,3'09 SPA~ISH BAY RO
LHUlA VhTA CA 91915
blf309131vO
.._ _ 1-
1236 DIS~OVEkY ~AY ~R
LHUlA VI)fA CA 91915
f.43091HIIO
12 145 Bo~~k' Illy. LlR
CHUlA VI)TA LA 91915
b4309U9110
- - - .-
1232 BUDeGA bAY LJR
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
C
bIf30'11..3 vO
'lIlI I ,-
1"748 BUDeGA bAY uR
LHUlA VI )TA CA 91915
~~~J 11~~~
1Z.n HALl- MOuN BAY"
CHUlA VI~TA CA 91915
b4 .HvOU3 vO
PAkT I PARCE:l R-Z..
eR SH I P
MAR lIiO.. i09
926 7 Z ) A
IMlTED PART/I
MAk IIZ04
9Zb7"
01431000,,00
PARLEL I<.-Z4,R-
ERSHIP
Z u9 AV
SAN
blo31000bOO
PARCEL R-i4,R-
Z09 AvENI l
SAN C r.TE LA
b4310007uO
PAI<.Ci:L R-Z4
,,09 AVi: DEL
SAN t:NTE CA
b4310011uO
CHAMPIUN~HIP SSICS AT EASTL
AKE ~REE UMi:OwNERS ASSN
~,u C AGi: DEVELOPMENT
i09 i:NiDA DEL "'AR 11204
)AN CleMt:NTE CA 9Z07i
t>4310015uO
PARTt PARCi:L R-Z4/
,09 AVEN DEL.
)AN CL t:NTE CA
0431001400
PARCEL t<.-,,4,R-
EkSHIP
209 AvEN DEL. MAR lIi04
SAN ~ ENTE 92672
04310011100
CHAMPIONSHIP CL.ASS
AKE GREEN~ HO ERS ASSN
C/O CuTTA i:VELOPMENT
Z09 Av A DeL MAR 'iOlo
SAN EI'IENTE CA 9267Z
6431100300
FIELDSTuNe LOMMu
5'065 MOt<.EHO ',,5u
SAN DIEu A 92J.Z1
-b4310019uO
EASTL.AKE Di:V NT
'100 LANE 11100
CHUL ~TA CA 91914
b4311004UO
FIELUSTONE CuMMUN
54b5 MUR t:HOU
)AN L1I
.'"'
'0 )
...,
'. ")
.0
10 )
.')
10 )
,
6431100500 -M 31.1.00600
F IE~DSTONE eOMMUN! T F 1 ELuS TONE CUM/'I
5465 /'I0REhOUS 54b5 f'luREHU
S AN D IE GO SAN ulEG
6431100900 04 3UO 1000
F 1 fl. DS TONE CO/'\/'\UN FlEluSTONE CUf'l
5465 MOREHOUse 54b5 f'lOREHU Ok .250
S AN DIEGO CA SAN vI EG A 9d-'l
6431101300 b/t3U01/t00
F IE~DHONE COf'lf'lu INC FlELuSTONE COf'l
5465 /'I0REHOUS 5/tb5 f'lUR EHu DK .250
5 AN 0 I E GO C SAN uI EG A 9"ld
0431101700 04 3UO 1800
F IE~DS TONE eOM/'Iu INe FIELuSTONE CUM/'IUN INC
5 "65 f'lOREHOUS R 'i50 5405 /'\OR EHUU
SAN 01 EGO 9Z 12.1. SA N lJ I I: G 0
o /t3.1.102100 0/t3lJ.02HO
123tl PI NEHUKS T RD bit 5 d TEI<T UWN LN A
C hUL A VIS TA C A 91915 CHULA VISTA LA 9.1.913
b";,l.1.02600
IN\.. FII:lUSTONE COMMUNI --H~C
5/tb5 f'lOREHUU~E .2,0
SA N U IEGU dd
6431102900 643l.l.03000
F lE~DS TONE COl"lf'l INI,; Fll:LuSTONE Cuf'l/'lUNITll:~ INC
5465 MOREHOU 5/tb5 ~O
SAN 01 EGO SAN ulEGU L il
0431103300 b/t31.1.03/tOO
FIELDSTONE COf'lMUNl INI,; FI ~LuSTONE COf'lMUN NC
54b5 /'I0fI.Er10uSE 5/t05 MOR EHUlJ .
S AN 0 lE GO C SAN uIEGO
b'o31103100 blt3U03800
F IELOSTONE CO f'lf'l UN ! Tl E IN l: PI ET !LA I<ONALO ElK AThLHN F
54b5 MOREHOUSE lU5 SlUE dUO Ok
5 AN OlE GO C CHULA vI51A CA 'H9.1.5
.
. 6/t 3UO 4200
IN I,; FIEluSTONE cu
5465 /'lORE Ok .2,0
SA N [) I LA 9dil
>>
. b,,3110/t500 bit 31.1.04b 00
FIELDSTONE COI'I/'lU FIEluSTONE CUM/'IUNIT tNC
5/tb5 /'I0llEHO R '250 5/tb5 /'I0REHLJUSE
SAN OlEG A 9212 J. SAN UIEGu d21
.
, b/t3110/t~ll b/t31.1.05000
If- J~~'" FII:LOSTONE CU/'I/'IUNITIES
i2tl ~ILYERAOO uR ,4b5 /'IlJfUHUU)E
C hULA Y ISTA CA 91915 SAN 01 EGO
0"31100700
FIELDSTuN~ COMMu
5"05 MOkEHO ~ '~5u
SAN DIE A v2121
0"31101.1.00
FIELDSTONE l.OM
5"05 MOREHO OR .~50
SAN DIEG A 92121
0,,31101500
FIELD S TON E CO MP'IlJ
5..65 MOkEHO uR .25u
SAN DIEli A ~2121
0"31101'100
FIELDSTONE l.OMMO INC
5"65 MOkEHO .,5u
SAN DIEb A 92121
0"3.1.102300
FIELDSTuNE l.OMMO ~ INC
5"05 MOREHO R .,50
SAN DIEb A 92121
b"31102700
FIELDSTUNE l.OMMuNIT C
5"05 MOl<EHOUS
SAN DIEbO 92121
0"3.1.103100
FIELDSTUNE l.OMMuNITI INC
5465 MOkEHOUSe ~ 0
SAN DlEliO
b..3110hOO
FIELDSTONe COMMuN
5"0~ MOkEHOOS
SAN DIEliO
6..31103'100
FIELDSTUNE COMMONITIE~ INC
5"0\~~~6~
SAN ~ 21
643110" 300
FIELDSTUNe COMMoNITI
5"05 MOREHOUSE
SAN DIEbO C
.INC
b43110" 7ii
- 1 .._....,_..._._
122" SILVERADO OR
CHULA VISTA CA 91~15
0"31105100
FIELDSTUNe l.OMMuNITIE~ INC
5"65D~~~~H~~S~
SAN ~,..,..
0" 3110U8 uO
FIELUSTOr..E t:S INC
~"05 MUR _ Ok .250
SA,.. l.i u l.A 92 1 21
olt311012uO
HELUSTOr-.E COM
~ltb5 MURt DR .250
SAN u u CA 9~1l1
0lt311016uo
~IeLUSTOr..E TIt:S INC
~"05 M UUSE 01< '2~0
SA EGu CA 91121
b"3110~OuO
~HL~STO"'E COMMU . C
?ltb5 MURtH '2?0
~AN U l.A 92121
0" 31102lt uO
FIELOSTOr..E CuMMUN
~"05 MuR tHO
~A'" 0 I
Ir-.C
bit 311032 '-0
F I ELUS TOr-.E COM
~lt05 MQR DR .250
~AN U CA 92111
olt31103&,",0
ESPIRITU ERNIE E/CLAkITA M
12~1 SILwEkAuO DR
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
0"3110"0,,0
FIELOSTOr..E COMMUN
~"05 MOR tHOU
HN l.JIEG
c
0" 311 o..lt uO
FIELOSTONE COMM INC
~ltb5 MURt: DR .2~0
~AN CA 9,121
olt3110"8uO
FIELOSTOr..E COMM NC
5"05 MORtH DR .250
SA N 0 I CA 921 21 .
olt31105200
FIELOSTONE C INC
~"05 M SE DR '250
SAr.. Gu CA 9~1~1
)
C
10 ")
eo
) .. )
.1)
.. )
f .0
.. .J
f eg
.
'"
""
UoI
0 Z
'" t-
G. '" I""
.. C
G.
0
o
'"
ilL '"
..
.i;
:::l
:::I
..J
...
>
..u C
Ooc
o
NIIolIlol
O>t:Z>
OCC
"'..J..JC
...t- ..J
"""'O~
~CO:I:
,oUoloou
5
c
%:
u
'"
o
..J
t-
Z
w
EO
ilL 0
0...
..J_
IIol
>.u
W>C
OQCt-
o '"
,....~"""~
O>t:Z>
OCC
N..J ..Jet
....-- ..J
"""'O~
"-CO:I:
,owooU
:::I
U
%
w
E
G.
:::l
..J
.u
>1Iol
..u>
OOet
o '"
,oUolIlol_
O>t:%>
OcC
......J..JC
....t- ..J
"""'O~
~CO:I:
,ow~U
:I
N
Q. '"
..
..J
'" '"
Cllol
t--C
"''''_00
.......IIKO
% ....
:::l..JN
EUoI~
EO
C
CU
Ou Z
01 0
"'VI%: '"
OCIIol IIol
0%....
NCIlD
....... ll\
,..,ZC,..,Z
.f"UoI...ooet
,0> UN'"
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I ~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
ITEM TITLE:
/~/J~
Approving implementation
budget system
Budget Manager ~~
Resolution
of a "performance based"
SUBMITTED BY:
'. ....
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X )
At the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting, Council referred to the City Manager to return
with a formal report and implementing document information to begin the implementation of a
Performance Based budget. This report and recommended resolution are in response to a report
presented at that meeting by Councilmember Moot. It is recommended that the City begin to
transition to a Performance based budget system as part of the development of the FY 1996-97
budget process.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution authorizing the City Manger to
begin implementation of a "Performance Based" budget system. .
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Current Budget Pormat
Chula Vista's existing budget format has been in place in excess of ten years. The budget
format was designed to present issues or proposed changes related to programs, and in that sense
is a "program budget", not a line item budget. The budget numbers were, however, constructed
from line items within each department since this was the format past City Councils were used
to. All discussion related to each individual department is stated in a narrative description of
the department which focuses on "issues", or changes from the past year's program. Since the
budget was always a "hold the line" budget, the basic services and programs were the same,
added to incrementally each year with a few new programs or expanded programs discussed in
the "issues" narrative. Some goals and objectives and some statistical information is also
provided, depending on the department. The format of these department narratives, while
generally consistent, have been flexible in order to convey what was most appropriate for the
current fiscal year.
As an introduction to the citywide budget, the City Manager presents an overview in the form
of a complete narrative transmittal letter which includes major funding and operational issues
citywide plus statistical information, highlights, revenue detail and other significant factors which
were involved in the development of the proposed budget. This transmittal has been designed
to provide a broad overview of the entire budget so that anyone could read the transmittal and
get a good feel for the City's budget as a whole.
/r; ., /
Page 2, Item )6
Meeting Date 12/12/95
New Budget System
The City recognized several years ago that the budget system on the City's mainframe computer
provided significant limitations in retrieving information as well as in presentation of budget
information. As a result, a CIP was developed and approved to purchase budget system software
to be placed on the City's Local Area Network (LAN) which would provide a more user-friendly
system and significantly improve the presentation of budget information as well as the retrieval
of budget information for improved management decision making. The new budget system has
been selected and installed on the Citywide LAN. Staff is still in the process of implementation
but will be preparing the PY 1996-97 budget on this new system. When this budget system was
selected, one of the reasons it was preferred was that it allowed the flexibility to apply different
types of budget formats.
The Budget as an Information and Decision Making Document
One of the difficulties the general public finds in reviewing our budget is that it includes no real
definitions of what each department's purpose is, what they do and what their plans are for the
future. A part of the format built into our new budget system is space to input a mission
statement for each department, goals, objectives and performance and output measures for each
division.
As an example, if someone wanted specific information on the Fire Prevention Bureau, the
current budget format only includes information for the entire Fire Department, and you would
have to look within the narrative description to see if anything was written about the Fire
Prevention Bureau. If this was a year that no significant changes were made in Bureau's
operations it's likely nothing would be included in the budget document related to the Fire
Prevention Bureau's operations. However, in the proposed format, in addition to the currently
provided summary information on the number of positions and funding level by categories for
this division would be goals, objectives, performance and output measures for the activities
related specifically to this division. In terms of improving Council's ability to make better
policy decisions from our proposed budget document, Council would clearly see the purpose of
the Fire Prevention Bureau and could focus on the types and frequencies of inspections that
occur and make recommendations on changes in inspection levels which may translate into
proposals for additional or lowered staffing levels.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City transition to a performance based budget process. While the
definition of performance budget does not exactly define all the parameters of the type of budget
that will be best for the city, the term "performance" most accurately sends a message that the
budget we want links the funding to some measurement of effectiveness. The goals of the
performance budget will help provide a more efficient and effective budget. What this means
is that we should be identifying what we want to accomplish first, then developing a budget that
supports those goals.
I~ - A.
Page 3, Item~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
While the performance budget most meets our needs, it would be best to not focus only on that
type of budget, but include the best aspects from all budget types to create a budget which truly
fits our organization. The aspects which are valuable from each budget type which should be
included are: continued appropriations based on determining spending needs in advance (line
item) and evaluating the cost/benefit of programs then establishing priorities for funding (zero-
based) and focusing on major City/Department issues.
Transitioning
Even though our new budget system can provide a significant amount of information, it is
unrealistic to believe that this transition year will produce a budget document which meets all
of our ultimate needs. For example, for some statistical performance data, a historical baseline
may not be available and may need to be developed over time. In this transition process, it is
recommended that we concentrate and focus on the following objectives for this first year:
1. Establish a Statement of Purpose for each Department and Major Program/Division
ACTION: Departments will prepare a Statement of Purpose for their department andfor all
major divisions. This information will be presented to the City Council in January as part of
the Department Head presentations and will also be included in the new format of the budget
document. Direction on this task has already been given to departments to prepare as part of
the development of the FY 96-97 budget.
2. Establish Goals/Objectives and Performance/Output Measures for Each Division/Program
ACTION: Departments will prepare a goals statement, objectives and peiformance measures
for each major division and program within their department. This information will be presented
to the City Council in January as part of the Department Head presentations and will also be
included in the new format of the budget document. Direction on this task has already been
given to departments to prepare as part of the development of the FY 96-97 budget.
3. Have Department Heads present all the above information to Council at a regularly
scheduled Council meeting (January)
ACTION: At the scheduled City Council meetings of January 9, 16, and 23 stajfhas placed
on the agenda under the Manager's Comments approximately one hour for presentations by
department heads. These presentations will be approximately 15 minutes each and will present
the departments statement of purpose, goals, objective and peiformance measures, as well as
other pertinent information on the major issues facing each department. Since these
presentations will occur at the end of the meeting should Council desire to continue dialog with
staff it may be done so at Council discretion. This will allow the Council to inteiface with the
City Manager, City management staff and department heads on what they believe are the highest
priorities and the direction they think the department should be heading.
4. City Manager to present a preliminary view of the FY 1996-97 budget revenues,
expenditures and key budget or policy issues (First of March)
/t'3
Page 4, Item I ~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
ACTION: Set up a Council workshop to evaluate the informationfrom department heads and
the preliminary revenue information with the City Manager, Budget Manager and the Director
of Finance. At this workshop, the Manager will discuss preliminary revenue and expenditure
information and present alternatives for restructure and cut back scenarios. This will give
Council a forum earlier in the budget process to state areas of concern and to give the Manager
feedback on the priorities of the Council.
5. Budget Format to be presented by Program/Division within each Department
ACTION: The budget will be presented in a different format which is designed to provide
additional information on each division/activity. Summary information by account by department
will still be presented in the proposed budget and reevaluated for inclusion in future budgets.
Each division/activity will also have related goals, objectives and peiformance measures.
A sample of the format is attached for your information. This program was selected specifically
because it can be tailored to meet Chula Vista's specific needs. This sample is from the County
of Sarasota, Florida, which uses the same budget system that we have purchased. While this
is how it is formatted for Sarasota, we may tailor this to meet our needs. At this time much has
been changed in the system to meet our terminology, however the system is still in the process
of refinement and as soon as we have finished our programming changes for the proposed budget
process and input some of our city information we will forward a sample to you as an
information memo. During the proposed meetings to review the department head presentations,
input from you would be helpful regarding the type of work program statistics you would like
to see included in this proposed budget document.
Continuing Budget Development
The most important aspect of transitioning to a new budget type and format is to continually
reevaluate the process and the product. It is recommended that the transition to a very different
type of budget will happen slowly and with a significant amount of information on what works
and what doesn't provided to staff from the Council and the Department users. As we continue
through this process, staff is encouraging employees, the Council and the public to provide
feedback on things they like and don't like about the process, format and document. This
information will be evaluated and used to continue to refine the process to better meet the needs
of those who participate in the process and use our document as a resource.
End of Year Evaluation
It is recommended that after the year-end closing (usually August) when actual fiscal year
expenditures and revenues are known, that we repeat the department head presentations at a
Council meeting to allow for discussion on how department achieved their goals and objectives
and how the final expenditure and revenue compare to the projections. This will allow for
discussion on unexpected problems or issues, unanticipated revenue or expenditures and
generally a how did we do discussion.
It-f
Page 5, Item I ~
Meeting Date 12/12/95
Departmental Expenditure Flexibility
In a separate action which will be brought to Council is a recommendation to increase the
flexibility of purchasing to place more responsibility on the departments for using funds as
necessary, but reducing the required controls on small transfers within departments control
accounts.
FISCAL IMPACT: This focus of this recommendation is to improve the process of the
development of the City's budget. While this action will not create additional savings or direct
costs, it is anticipated that this process will facilitate positive changes to the city's budget and
create efficiencies that may have a positive impact of expenditure reductions.
It-116 ~6
RESOLUTION NO.
1?1~p
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING IMPLEMENTATION OF A
"PERFORMANCE BASED" BUDGET SYSTEM
WHEREAS, at the November 14, 1995 City Council meeting,
Council requested the city Manager to return with a formal report
and implementing document information to being the implementation
of a Performance Based budget; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the city begin to
transition to a Performance based budget system as part of the
development of the FY 1996-97 budget process; and
WHEREAS, the goals of the performance budget will help
provide a more efficient and effective budget; and
WHEREAS, in the transition process, it is recommended
that we concentrate and focus on the following objectives for the
first year:
1. Establish a Statement of Purpose for each Department and Major
Program Division.
2. Establish Goals/Objectives and Performance/Output Measures for
Each Division/Program.
3. Have Department Heads present all the above information to
Council at a regularly scheduled Council Meeting in January.
4. City Manager to p;resent a preliminary view of the FY 1996-97
budget revenues, expenditures and key budget or policy issues
(First of March).
5. Budget Format to be presented by program/Division within each
Department.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve implementation of a
"performance based" budget system.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Dawn Herring, Budget Manager
C: \ rs\perfom. bud
Jtf'l
l
f
,
\.
J
"
1
[
[
1
(
I
I
I
I
I
LIBRARIES
Mission Statement:
The Libraries Department is designed to select, acquire, organize and
distribute books, periodicals, audio-visuals and other resources necessary
to meet the information needs of the community. These materials are
specifically provided to facilitate informal self education, to enrich and
develop subjects on which individuals are undertaking formal education, and
to encourage wholesome recreation and constructive use of leisure time.
The Libraries Department includes the following divisions: Administration,
Technical Services, Automated Systems, Selby Library, Bookmobile, Gulf Gate
Library, Venice Library, Elsie Quirk Library (Englewood), North Port
Library and the Environmental Library. The new Jacaranda Library is
scheduled to open during October, 1993.
DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION:
FY92 FY93 FY94 FY94 FY94
ACTUAL BUDGET CONTIN ISSUES TOTAL
LIBRARY ADMIN 273,924 605,388 694,482 509,700 1,204,182
LIBRARY SUPPORT SVC 0 942,415 993,094 0 993,094
SELBY LIBRARY 1,827,?19 852,999 736,503 0 736,503
BOOKMOBILE 78,202 88,057 87,079 0 87,079
GULF GATE LIBRARY 290,248 311,741 335,404 0 335,404
VENICE LIBRARY 566,104 619,183 624,380 0 624,380
ELSIE QUIRK LIBRARY 296,738 302,320 324,682 0 324,682
NORTH PORT LIBRARY 225,581 355,876 315,853 0 315,853
ENVIRONMENTAL LIB 54,431 57,338 62,032 0 62,032
JACARANDA LIBRARY 0 238 , 511 324.215 0 324.215
TOTALS: 3,612,447 4,373,828 4,497,724 509,700 5,007,424
DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES BY FUND:
FY92 FY93 FY94 FY94 FY94
ACTUAL BUDGET CONTIN ISSUES TOTAL
GENERAL 3,461,398 3,928,914 4,199,824 509,700 4,709,524
LIBRARY GIFTS 151,049 319,914 277,900 0 277,900
INFRA SURTAX 0 125.000 20.000 0 20,000
TOTALS : 3,612,447 4,373,828 4,497,724 509,700 5,007,424
PERSONNEL SUMMARY:
FTE 100.95 4.00 104.95
ACTUAL POSITIONS 123.00 4.00 127.00
FY94 Adopted Budget/Departmental Summary
/d-9
F-40
",..._..,~
,,~ ' ~,
LIBRARIES
PROGRAM:
LIBRARIES: LIBRARY SERVICE
Objectives:
1. Provide materials, information and community programs relating to
library science, to Sarasota residents and the general public.
2. Increase materials circulation by 3\.
3. Provide current and correct responses to reference questions.
4. Make all books available within 3 months after check-out.
5. Offer additional education and civic programs to adults and children of
the community.
DESCRIPTION
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
UNIT
FY 92
Circulation per capita
Reference transactions per capita
Registration as a \ of population
Turn-around time for processing
material items
Attendence per capita
Circulation of materials: .
-Selby
-Bookmobile
-Gulf Gate
-Venice
-Elsie Quirk
-North Port
-Environmental
-Jacaranda
Total
Reference Transactions:
-Selby
Number
Number
Percent
4.93
2.08
59%
FY 93
4.85
2.37
58%
6
.31
445,000
60,000
457,368
484,078
198,143
144,229
5,400
o
1,794,218
383,117
FY94 Adopted Bud9'et/Objectives & Performance Measures
h
_.
Months
Number
6
.22
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
444,133
54,859
446,649
518,655
205,277
113,177
5,278
o
1,788,028
Number
325,860
F-53
/~ -/t?
~,;"..
FY 94
5.06
2.52
58%
3
.31
458,350
61,800
471,089
498,600
204,087
148,556
5,562
60,000
1,908,044
394,611
a
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-_..'-^'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARKS & RECREATION
Mission Statement:
The Parks and Recreation Department is responsible for the operation and
maintenance of over 120 areas and facilities located throughout the County.
The Parks System incorporates over 2,600 acres of land and includes
facilities in the cities of Sarasota, Venice and North Port.
The Parks and Recreation Department includes the following Divisions:
Administration, North County Operations, South County Operations and
Special Recreation.
DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURES BY DIVISION:
FY92 FY93 FY94 FY94 FY94
ACTUAL BUDGET CONTIN ISSUES TOTAL
PARKS AND REC ADMIN 1,949,780 2,470,141 2,810,517 0 2,810,517
NORTH CTY OPERATIONS 5,104,505 3,254,064 3,970,960 169,109 4,140,069
SOUTH CTY OPERATIONS 1,833,079 3,558,860 2,953,224 424,446 3,377,670
SPECIAL RECREATION 545,367 854,758 1,023,621 0 1,023,621
TOTALS: 9,432,731 10,137,823 10,758,322 593,555 11,351,877
DEPARTMENT EXPENDITORES BY FUND:
FY92 FY93 FY94 FY94 FY94
ACTUAL BUDGET CONTIN ISSUES TOTAL
GENERAL 8,887,364 9,283,065 9,734,701 593,555 10,328,256
SPECIAL RECREATION 545.367 854,758 1.023.621 0 1.023.621
TOTALS: 9,432,731 10,137,823 10,758,322 593,555 11,351,877
PERSONNEL SUMMARY:
FTE 213.94 18.00 231.94
ACTUAL POSITIONS 235.00 18.00 253.00
FY94 Proposed Budget/DepartmentQl Summary ,1~-~~
F-56
~
I
PARKS & RECREATION
PROGRAM:
RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS
I
I
Objectives:
I
1. Maintain high quality customer service through marketing programs and
activities.
I
2. Raise facility and maintenance standards through internal collaboration
and centralization of equipment, manpower, and resources.
I
3. Serve the public with professionalism, efficiency and courtesy, through
on the job training and public relations involvement.
4. Increase the effectiveness of computer assisted program registration,
facility reservations and maintenance programs to provide a higher level of
customer service and internal efficiency.
I
I
5. Implement further plans to address coastal needs, recycling, and
environmental sensitivity to protect and preserve resources for the future.
I
6. Continue to review, monitor, coordinate, implement, and update the
department's Comprehensive/Capital plan.
I
7. Consolidate with the City of North Port's Parks and Recreation
Department, effective with the beginning Qf the fiscal year. Review and
make recommendations to increase efficiency and improve the level of
service.
I
8. Continue to monitor, review, and make necessary changes to the
organizational structure of the ~epartment to be certain that services are
being provided efficiently.
I
I
DESCRIPTION
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
UNIT
FY 92
FY 93
FY 94
I
Total recreation programs
Program participants
Programs
Persons
601
266,892
612
278,426
650
304,515
I
I
I
FY94 Adopted Budget/Objectives & Performance Measures
F-71
/J,' /.2..
I
~~- ---- - --- -- --- - - ~-- --- -- ~-- - - - - ~--
!
*
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
PARKS & RECREATION
PROGRAM:
PARKS - PASSIVE
Objectives:
1. Maintain high quality customer service through marketing programs and
activities.
2. Raise facility and maintenance standards through internal collaboration
and centralization of equipment, manpower, and resources.
3. Serve the public with professionalism, efficiency and courtesy, through
on the job training and public relations involvement.
4. Increase the effectiveness of computer assisted program registration,
facility reservations and maintenance programs to provide a higher level of
customer service and internal efficiency.
5. Implement further plans to address coastal needs, recycling, and
environmental sensitivity to protect and preserve resources for the future.
6. Continue to review, monitor, coordinate, implement, and update the
department's Comprehensive/Capital plan.
7. Consolidate with the City of North Port's Parks and Recreation
Departme~.t, effective with the beginning of the fiscal year.
8. Continue to monitor, review, and make necessary changes to the
organizational structure of the department to be certain that services
being provided efficiently.
are
DESCRIPTION
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
UNIT
FY 92
FY 93
FY 94
Passive Park Sites
Facility utilization
Total service cost per visitor*
*change due to passive areas
becoming active
Sites
Visitors
Dollars
70
938,274
0.37
70
1,002,805
0.33
74
1,052,617
0.15
FY94 Adopted Budget/Objectives & Performance Measures
F-70
I~" /;1
~
I
PARKS & RECREATION
PROGRAM:
PARKS - ACTIVE
I
I
Objectives:
I
1. Maintain high quality customer service through marketing programs and
activities.
I
2. Raise facility and maintenance standards through internal collaboration
and centralization of equipment, manpower, and resources.
I
3. Serve the public with professionalism, efficiency and courtesy, through
on the job training and public relations involvement.
I
4. Increase the effectiveness of computer assisted program registration,
facility reservations and maintenance programs to provide a higher level of
customer service and internal efficiency.
I
5. Implement additional plans to address coastal needs, recycling, and
environmental sensitivi~y to protect and preserve resources for the future.
I
6. Continue to review, monitor, coordinate, implement and update the
Department's Comprehensive/Capital plan.
I
7. Consolidate with the City of North Port's Parks and Recreation
Department, effective with the beginning of the fiscal year. Review and
make recommendations to increase efficiency and to improve the level of
service.
I
8. Continue to monitor, review and make necessary changes to the
organizational structure of the department to be certain that services are
being provided efficiently.
I
I
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
DESCRIPTION UNIT FY 92 FY 93 FY 94
Active Park Sites Sites 49 51 57
Facility Rentals Rentals 4,758 4,930 5,127
Revenue generated as , of
Total service cost Percent 11\ 11\ 11%
visitors utilizing facilities Visitors 8,851,217 9,293,277 10,048,941
Total service cost per visitor l-,llars 0.93 0.91 1. OS
I
I
I
I
FY94 Adopted Budget/Objectives & Performance Measures
F-69
I
a. "'~
.,..... . .""..""._,"".,,~,."""""ML'~'''_ '"'H~_'_~""_~."""_
--~-