HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1994/09/27
,
III declare ynder penalty of perjury that I arfl
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that, I posted
this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin B~ard at
the Public ervic 5 Building a~n a;'~lt Hall on .. .
Tuesday, September 27, 1994 D. 2. IGNED _::L-----~,_ - Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. DATE . Public Services Building
Rerular Meetin. of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Counci1members Fox _, Horton _, Moore _' Rindone _, and
Mayor Nader _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
September 20, 1994
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Oath of Office:
Child Care Commission Ex-Officio - Charlene Tressler;
*****
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any Ji11J1l actions taken in closed session and to a4joum the meeting.
Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However,
final actions reported wiU be recorded in the minutes which win be availoble in the City Clerk's Office.
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 11)
The staff recommenrlotions regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calenrlor win be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fiU out a
"Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete
the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommenrlotion; complete the pink fonn to speak in opposition to
the staff recommenrlotion.) Items pulled from the Consent Calenrlor win be discussed after Board and
Commission Recommenrlotions and Action Items. Items pulled by the public win be the first items of business.
S. WRITTEN COMMlJNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there was no reportable actions taken from the
Closed Session of 9/20/94.
Agenda
-2-
September 27, 1994
6. ORDINANCE 2605 ESTABLISHING AN ACCESS APPEALS BOARD (first readiDl!1 - The
California Code of Regulations, Health and Safety Code mandates the creation
of an Access Appeals Board to hear written appeals hrought by any person
regarding action laken by the Building Department of the City in enforcement
of the requirements. The Department of Building and Housing staff has brought
forth this requirement to the Board of Appeals and Advisors for consideration
and endorsement. The Board of Appeals and Advisors has reviewed staffs
proposed Ordinance and recommends its adoption. Staff recommends Council:
(1) Place the ordinance on first reading; and (2) Direct the City Clerk, after the
second reading and adoption, to solicit applications for the Access Appeals
Board. (Director of Building and Housing)
7.A. RESOLUTION 17666 EXECUTING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENERGY
COMMISSION TO PROVIDE $55,000 IN GRANT FUNDING AND
APPROPRIATING THOSE FUNDS TO THE ENERGY CONSERVATION
FUND AND APPROVING BUDGET FOR SAME - The California Energy
Commission provided $55,000 in grant funding to develop an alternative fuels
retrofit rebate program to be offered to the Chula Vista businesses and to create
a local market for electric vehicles development and use. The funds will also
be used to help in the purchase of an electric shuttle for Chula Vista's
Telecenter Program, for approval of a Request for Proposal, and approval of a
$5,000 contract to provide a public information program for the retrofit rebate
program. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Administration)
4/5th's vote required.
B. RESOLUTION 17667 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONTRACT
FOR $10,000 WITH ELEKTRUK TO PURCHASE AN ELECTRIC
RETROFITTED VAN FOR CHULA VlSTA'S TELECENTER
C. RESOLUTION 17668 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SOLICIT RESPONSES FOR
A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR $5,000 IN CONSULTING
SERVICE TO DEVELOP AND PROMOTE AN ALTERNATIVE FUELS
RETROFIT REBATE PROGRAM
8. RESOLUTION 17669 APPROVING THE 1993/94 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR
THE COMMUNITYDEVELOPMENr BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND
AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMISSION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF
HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT - The City annually submits a
Grantee Performance Report (GPR) to the U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development. The GPR provides detailed information on the use of
Community Development Block Grant funds, including the progress achieved
and status of funds. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Community Development)
9. RESOLUTION 17670 ACCEPTING FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LffiRARY
SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT TITLE VI LffiRARY
LITERACY PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO THE CHULA
VISTA LITERACY TEAM, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND AMENDING
THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 BUDGET TO INCLUDE .83 FULL TlME
EMPLOYEE POSITIONS - The Chula Vista Literacy Team has received
$34,720 in funding under the Library Services and Construction Act, Title VI
Library Literacy Program, to implement a model program to identify and aid
adult learners with dyslexia. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Library Director) 4/5th's vote required.
Agenda
-3-
September 27, 1994
10. RESOLUTION 17671 ACCEPflNG FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, LffiRARY
SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT TITLE VI LffiRARY
LITERACY PROGRAM GRANT FUNDS AWARDED TO THE CHULA
VISTA LITERACY TEAM, APPROPRIATlNG FUNDS, AND AMENDING
THE FISCAL YEAR 1994/95 BUDGET TO INCLUDE .48 FULL TIME
EMPLOYEE POSITIONS - The Chula Vista Literacy Team has received
$34,986 in funding to continue its work developing and offering a variety of
small group writing classes to adult learners at several locations throughout
Chula Vista. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Library Director)
4/5Ih's vole required.
11. REPORT MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP)
FINANCING AND ACQUISITION STRATEGY PRINCIPLES - On
5/26/94, the MSCP Policy Committee, which includes a representative of the
Council, conceptually approved five principles regarding financing and
acquisilionoflands to be included in the MSCP. On 8/1194, the San Diego City
Council reviewed these principles and recommended addilionallanguage. Staff
recommends Council endorse the principles as revised by the City of San Diego.
(Director of Planning)
· · END OF CONSENT CALENDAR · ·
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by iJJw. Jfyou wish to
speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Fonn" avaiiJJble in the iJJbby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete
the piak fonn to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per
individual.
None submitted.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City CouncU on any subject matter within the
CouncU's jurisdiction that is !J!!1. an item on this agenda for publIc discussion. (SIDte iJJw, however, generally
prohibits the City CouncU from IDking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to
address the CouncU on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications
Fonn" avaiiJJble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City CouncU will consider iJems which have been forwartkd to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or CommiJtees.
None submitted.
Agenda
-4-
September 27, 1994
ACTION ITEMS
The items Usted in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by
the CouncU, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the CouncU
and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to spealc, please
Jill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Cleric prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to five minutes.
12.
REPORT
UPDATE ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES - An oral report will be
given by staff.
RESOLUTION 17672 WAIVING TIlE CONSULTANT SELECTION REQUIREMENTS AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE FIRSf
AMENDMENT EXTENDING CONTRACT NUMBER C094-082 NOT TO
EXCEED $55,000 FOR SOLID WASTE CONSULT ANT SERVICES WITH
BROWN, VENCE AND ASSOCIATES (BVA), AND APPROPRIATING
FUNDS THEREFOR - At the 6/7/94 meeting, Council approved a $25,000
contract with BY A for specialized solid waste consultant services related to the
first pbase development of a transfer station and materials recovery facility.
Services under this contract have been provided at the City's discretion and paid
for on a "time-and-materials" basis. There is about $4,000 in funds remaining
in the current contract. If the City desires to have future services available, an
extension of contract funds will be necessary in the near future. The amendment
appropriates $30,000 in additional funds for services which can be projected to
be provided to the City at least through the end of this calendar year. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl)
4/51h's vote required.
13.
REPORT
BUILDING PERMIT ACTIVITY OVER TIlE PAST YEAR AS IT
RELATES TO IMPLEMENTATION OF TRANSPORTATION
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES - Staff is presenting a written report
discussing the rate at which residential building permits have been issued during
the past year as compared with previous years. Staff recommends Council
accept the report. (Director of Public Works & Director of Planning)
14.
REPORT
UPDATE ON REGIONAL SEWER ISSUES - An oral report will be given
by staff.
ITEMS PULLED FROM TIlE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City CouncU will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by CouncUmembers.
Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
Agenda
-5-
September 27, 1994
OTHER BUSINESS
15. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTlSl
a. Scheduling of meetings.
16. MAYOR'S REPORTlSl
a. Letter received from The Honorable William S. Cannon regarding applications for the Board of
Ethics.
b. Ratification of appointments:
Board of Appeals - Peter S. Puzon;
Board of Ethics - Joanne E. Carson, Billy L. Kelley and Richard D. Schulman - Continued from
the meeting of 9/20/94;
International Friendship Commission - Eduardo Sebrano - Continued from the meeting of
9/20/94.
c. Site for Kids Biz Program - discussion and possible direction. Continued from the meeting of
9/20/94.
17. COUNCIL COMMENTS
CLOSED SESSION
Unless the City Attorney, the City Ma1l/lger or the City CouncU states otherwise at this time, the Council wUl
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a closed
session discussion, and which the CouncU is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the
interests of the City. The CouncU is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of JiJJJJl action
taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed
sessions, the videotaping wUl be termi1l/lted at this point in order to save costs so that the CouncU's return from
closed session, reports of JiJJJJl action taken, and culjoumment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of fi1l/l1 action taken wUl be recorded in the minutes which wiU be available in the City Clerk's Office.
18. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ExistiDl! litigation pursuant to Govenunent Code
Section 54956.9
. Chaparral Greens vs. the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, and Baldwin.
19. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - AnticiDated litigation pursuant to Govenunent Code
Section 54956.9
. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (h) of Section 54956.9: 1.
. City vs. Solid Waste Management JPA (differential rate structure and transfer station
Agenda
-6-
September 27, 1994
20. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR. Pursuant to GOvenunent Code Section 54957.6
. Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive
Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA), Western Council
of Engineers (WCE), Police Officers Association (POA), and International Association
of Fire Fighters (IAFF).
Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. Pursuant to Govenunent Code Section
54957
. Title: City Attorney
21. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR. Pursuant to Govenunent Code Section
54956.8
. Property: School District property next to Community Hospital Medical Center.
Negotiating parties: John Goss.
Under negotiation: Potential acquisition of site for Veterans Home.
22. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on October 4, 1994
at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
September 22, 1994
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John D. Goss, City Manager Y
City Council Meeting of Se<<mber 27, 1994
TO:
FROM:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, September 27, 1994. Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as folIows:
5a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no
reportable actions taken at the closed session of September 20, 1994. IT
IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND
FILED.
JDG:mab
~V?-
~
~~~~
CllY OF
CHUlA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
From:
September 22, 1994
The Honorable Mayor and city co~;~
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorne~~
Date:
To:
Re:
Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 9/20/94
At the Council meeting of 9/20/94, the Council directed the city
Attorney to prepare whatever ordinance changes are required in
order to provide a place on the agenda for a report of disclosable
actions taken following Closed Session from the preceding weekly
Council meeting.
Inasmuch as such ordinance change would not be effective for
approximately 40 days and due to the pending workload in the city
Attorney's office, the City Attorney is recommending that until an
ordnance change can be implemented, that reports of disclosable
actions occur as written communications to the City Council and
presented in the same fashion as other written communications.
If the Council finds that procedure acceptable, please accept this
letter as the City Attorney's first report pursuant thereto.
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City
Attorney participated, that there were no actions taken in the
Closed Session of 9/20/94 which are required under the Brown Act to
be reported.
BMB:lgk
C:\lt\clossess.920
-
01}--/
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM:
?
MEETING DATE: 9/27/94
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Ordinance .2 ~d~tabIiShing an Access Appeals Board
Director of Building and Hou~L/
City Manager ~~\\, 4/5ths Vote: (Yes _ No X)
BACKGROUND:
The California Code of Regulations, Health and Safety Code mandates the creation of
an Access Appeals Board to hear written appeals brought by any person regarding
action taken by the Building Department of the City in enforcement of the requirements.
Section 19957.5 of the Health and Safety Code explicitly dictates the makeup of such
a Board. The State Health and Safety Code specifically calls for a five member board,
with the following requirements: "two members of the Access Appeals Board shall be
physically handicapped persons, two members shall be persons experienced in
construction, and one member shall be a public member". The actions of the Access
Appeals Board is final and cannot be appealed to the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Place the Ordinance on its first reading.
2. Direct the City Clerk, after the second reading and adoption of the Ordinance, to
solicit applications for the Access Appeals Board.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Department of Building and Housing brought forth this State mandated requirement
to the Board of Appeals and Advisors for consideration and endorsement. The Board
of Appeals and Advisors reviewed staff's proposals at the meetings of June 13, 1994 and
July 11, 1994, and final action was taken on September 19, 1994 for recommended
adoption.
t-j
DISCUSSIQN:
Membershio: Department of Building and Housing staff presented several options to the
Board of Appeals and Advisors for the creation of the Access Appeals Board. The Board
of Appeals and Advisors discussed the options presented at its meetings of June 13,
1994 and July 11, 1994. After research by staff and consultation with the City Attorney's
Office, the options presented to the Board of Appeals and Advisors for consideration
were as follows:
1. To establish an Access Appeals Board with the membership criteria as stated in
the California Code of Regulations, Health and Safety Code, Section 19957.5
consisting of five members recommended by the Mayor, ratified by City Council.
The Access Appeals Board may be made up with members from existing Boards
and/or Commissions within the City in compliance with City Charter provisions.
(Attachment "A")
2. To establish an Access Appeals Board by altering the current make-up of the
Board of Appeals and Advisors by including an additional three members,
upgrading the current number from seven to ten members. The criteria for forty
percent (40%) representation of disabled members would be required. Hence,
four of the ten members would have to represent the disabled community.
(Attachment "B")
3. To not establish an Access Appeals Board; and that the City Council act as the
appellate body as permitted by the CCR, Health and Safety Code.
The unanimous recommendation of the Board of Appeals and Advisors was for Option
Number 1. The Board's asses9ment for recommending this option was founded on the
merit that this option represented the least amount of financial impact to the City due to
the potential of joint memberships on each Board. A secondary consideration by the
Board of Appeals and Advisors was the belief for establishing a degree of continuity
between the Board of Appeals and Advisors and the newly created Access Appeals
Board.
Freauencv of Meetinas: The Access Appeals Board shall meet on an as-needed basis,
as determined by the filing of Disabled Access Complaints, but not more than one
meeting each month. Staff anticipates approximately four to six meetings annually.
Suooort Staff: The Department of Building and Housing is recommending that the
Director of Building and Housing be recognized as the "Secretary to the Access Appeals
Board". The Department's Administrative Secretary would serve as the clerical support
for the Board.
2
t,-2
Summary: Briefly, the merits of establishing an autonomous Access Appeals Board to
hear matters pertaining to both State of California, Title 24 access issues and matters
pertaining to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) are strong. Specifically, this is
due to the recent adoption by City Council in June, 1994 of the ADA Transition Plan and
the recent amendments to the State Building Code Standards effective in April, 1994, the
mandatorY requirement for establishing an Access Appeals Board is encumbered upon
the City. It is the recommendation of the Board of Appeals and Advisors that the City
Council not act as the Access Appeals Board due to the numerous pressing constraints
on the Council's collective time and that a degree of expertise in the disabled field be
recognized.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The Operational Budget of the Access Appeals Board is estimated at approximately $500
annually, to cover supplies, copying, postage and publication costs. The exact budget
amount will be determined after establishment of the Board. Expenses which may be
encumbered during the balance of FY 1994-95 will be charged against the Board of
Appeals and Advisors accounts; however, staff will keep itemized deductions of these
expenses in order to establish funds needed for the next fiscal year.
IYU
(M:\SHNIEllIIllD _HSGV\CC8A11 S)
;-J/6-1
ORDINANCE NO. .2 ~1J5
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING CHAPTER
2.27 TO THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING AN
ACCESS APPEALS BOARD
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding a new
Chapter 2.27 to read as follows:
CHAPTER 2.27
ACCESS APPEALS BOARD
Section 2.27.010 Creation.
There is hereby created an Access Appeals Board.
Section 2.27.020 Definition.
The following terms shall be interpreted and construed as set forth herein:
A. "Disabled" shall be as defined in the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.
B. "Building Official. shall be the Director of Building and Housing
Section 2.27.030 Purpose and Intent.
It is the purpose and intent of the City Council in establishing the Access Appeals
Board to create a body to conduct hearings on written appeals and may approve
or disapprove interpretations and enforcement actions taken by the Building
Department of the City as necessitated by the language in the California Code of
Regulations, Health and Safety Code, Section 19957.5.
Section 2.27.040 Functions and Duties.
The functions and duties of the Access Appeals Board shall be as follows:
A. To hear and decide appeals of orders, decisions or determinations made
by the Building Official relative to the application and interpretation of
disabled access issues pursuant to the California Code of Regulations,
1
~"f
State Building Code, Title 24.
B. To ratify the decision of the Building Official to exempt unreasonable
hardship cases when equivalent facilitation cannot be provided.
Section 2.27.050 Membership.
A. Number of Members.
The Board shall consist of five (5) Voting Members, one (1) Staff Ex-officio
Member, and such other General Ex-officio Members as the City Council
shall, from time-to-time appoint.
B. Designation of Members.
1. Voting Members.
The five (5) Voting Member shall be appointed by the City Council
from the qualified electors of the City in accordance with the
provision of Section 600, et seq. of the Charter, who shall be
residents of the City and who shall, throughout their term, maintain
their residency and elector status. Furthermore, the membership
must also meet the criteria as set forth in the Health and Safety
Code, Section 19957.5, as follows: two members shall be physically
handicapped persons, two members shall be persons experienced
in construction and one member shall be a public member.
2. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The one (1) Staff Ex-officio Member shall be the City Manager or his
designated representative, who shall not be required to be a
qualified elector of the City, and who shall have no vote ("Staff Ex-
officio Member").
3. General Ex-officio Membec.
The City Council, or its designee, may appoint such additional Ex-
officio Members of the Board as they deem appropriate, who shall
not be required to be qualified elector(s) of the City, but any such
appointed Ex-officio Members shall have no vote ("General Ex-officio
Member").
Section 2.27.060 Term of Office.
2
~-~
A. Term of Office - All Classes of Members.
1 Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection A, the term of
Office of all Members, and all classes of Members, of said Board
shall be for a nominal period of four (4) years, and shall terminate
on June 30th of the fourth (4th) year of their term, unless they shall
otherwise sooner resign, die, become disqualified or incompetent to
hold Office.
2. Terms of Existing Voting Members.
Notwithstanding Subsection A.1, the terms of existing Voting
Members of the Access Appeals Board shall conclude for one (1)
Voting Member on June 30, 1995, for one (1) Voting Member on
June 30, 1996, for one (1) Voting Member on June 30, 1997 and for
two (2) Voting Members on June 30, 1998, unless they shall
otherwise sooner resign, die, become disqualified or incompetent to
hold Office.
3. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The term of the Staff Ex-officio Member shall be indefinite, and
he/she shall serve at the pleasure of the Council.
4 General Ex-officio Member.
The term of the General Ex-officio Members shall be for a period of
four (4) years from the time of appointment.
5. Holdover Office.
Notwithstanding the end of any Member's term as herein provided,
a Member, other than the Staff Ex-officio Member, shall be permitted
to continue to exercise the privileges of his or her former Office until
the Office to which the Member was appointed is filled by
reappointment of a qualified successor.
6. Vacancies.
Notwithstanding the term of Office to which a Member is appointed,
said Office shall be deemed vacant upon any of the following events
("Event of Vacancy")'
a. The death or disability of said Member that renders said
3
~.?
Member incapable of performing the duties of Office.
b. The Member's conviction of a felony or crime involving moral
turpitude.
c. The Member's absence from three (3) regular, consecutive
meetings of the Board, unless excused by majority vote of
the Board expressed in its official minutes.
d. The Member has submitted a resignation which resignation
has been accepted by the City Council.
e. The Membership has been terminated by three affirmative
votes of the City Council.
Upon the occurrence of an Event of Vacancy as hereinabove listed,
the City Council shall so declare the Office to be vacant, and shall
expeditiously take such steps as necessary to fill said vacancy
B. Number of Terms.
1. Voting Members.
a. Two Term Limit. No Voting Member shall be appointed to
more than two (2) terms except as herein provided ("Two
Term Limit").
b Unexpired Term Exception. Notwithstanding the Two Term
Limit, a person appointed to the Board as a Voting Member
to fill the unexpired term of an Office of a Voting Member
which as become vacant ("Unexpired Term") which has less
then two (2) years remaining on said Unexpired Term, may
be appointed to two (2) terms in addition to their Unexpired
Term. A Voting Member who currently occupies an Office
may not be reappointed to fill the Unexpired Term of another
Office which has become vacant.
c. Any Voting Member may be reappointed to serve on the
Board after two (2) successive years of not serving on the
Board in any Office or Membership capacity - Voting or Staff
Ex-officio.
2. General Ex-officio Members.
4
& ...8"
A General Ex-officio Member may be reappointed without limitation
as to number of terms.
Section 2.27.070 Operation of Board.
A. Frequency, Time and Place of Regular Meetings.
The Board shall meet on an as-needed basis, as determined by the filing
of disabled access complaints, but not more than one meeting each
month. The meeting shall commence at a time designated by the Chair or
at 4:00 p.m. on the Second Monday of each month, immediately prior to
the Board of Appeals and Advisors meeting, or at such other day and time
that it shall designate in written resolution, a copy of which shall be
forwarded to the City Council and entered in the minutes of the meeting
thereof, in Conference Room One of the Public Services Building at the
City Hall Complex located at 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, or at such
other place that it shall designate by written resolution, a copy of which
shall be forwarded to the City Council and entered in the minutes of the
meeting thereof, or at such place as may be posted upon the door of said
Conference Room at least thirty (30) minutes in advance of the meeting.
B. Officers and Board.
The Board shall select a Chairperson and a Vice-Chairperson from among
its Voting Members annually at its first meeting in July of each fiscal year.
The Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson so selected shall serve for a period
of one (1) year.
C Special Meetings.
The Board may meet specially at such other time, days and places as it
shall establish by majority vote, or at such time as the Chairperson thereof
may call, or at such times as a majority of the members thereof may call
a meeting.
D Conduct of Meetings.
The meetings of the Board, and notice thereof, shall be governed by the
same rules and regulations by which the City Council is bound in the
conduct of the public meetings.
E. Quorum.
Three (3) Voting Members shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of
5
~-'i
business.
F. Resolutions.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the entire membership shall be
required for the passage of any resolution of the Board.
G. Reports and Recommendation.
All reports and recommendations shall be made in writing.
H. Staff Support.
All Officers and Department Heads shall cooperate with and render
reasonable assistance to the Board. The City Manager may make
available staff and clerical support to the Board to fulfill its functions and
duties, provided such staff and clerical support is available.
I. Rules and Regulations.
The Board may make such rules and regulations not inconsistent with the
provisions of this Chapter.
J. Gifts and Grants.
The Board may, subject to the approval of the City Council, accept gifts
and grants from any source to assist it in the performance of its functions.
K. By-Laws.
The Board may pass such other further rules and regulations regarding the
internal affairs of the Board as are not inconsistent with the terms and
conditions of this Chapter.
SECTION II. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from
and after its adoption.
Kenneth G. Larsen, C B.a.
Director of Building & Housing
(M:\SHAREDlBLD _HSGIACCESORO)
t
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
Presented by'
6
~ -It)
.-<
EO>
~ C
>- Q) - e Q) ._
-- as_ > ~Q)
.... ~ - 0
as - en. "'C
Eo en ~ 0 .c ._
C"'C Q):.:: as en
en .- ~ .c .c Q) C
as Q) as E :J .r:. 8
o>:C 0 Q) 0._
C .en al E as Q) .9
:Cen~OCDQ)~
~ 8. m ~ C E .g
gen8:: -~oQ.
.- as <C Q) Q) ~ 1:
>-en 0>_ > Q)
.c~en"'C~en
-oenQ)~~E
\wi en Q) _ \wI1 0 _
Q) .- 0 ~ C en C
~~<co oE.:;.o
.- <C C Q) "'C 0.
:C"'CQ)~en<cQ.
asc.r:.cQ)"'Cas
1;) as .- .Q 0. c 0
Q)en .OQ)as_
Q)CiSCi::J~en"'C
.c Q) .- ~ Q) as Q)
Q..r:. en C Q) ~
- enCO Q)
~ ~ CD 0 "'C 8:::2
en_.coc<c~
"'CoE.r:.as_o
(ij"'CQ)~~oo
o ~ E ~ .- "'C Q) .
N'\ '" en C ~ .c en
Y-IoCiS~:Jas 1:
~al :J.cQ) E 0= as
as Q) "'C E al as 0
Q) .r:. - E Q) .r:. :.::
0. - en Q) 0 .r:. en 0.
Q.E1;)EO_sa.
<C 0 "'C-cas
en.g 0 ~J!! ~ Q)ECiS
en en Q) .s::; .c ~ C
Q) ~ 0 c as Q) Q) 0
o Q) en .c ~ ._
~ .cE -5 S :c E .~:a
Q) C Q) Q) \wi "'C
~Q)~o.r:.:E~as
.-E_o_
.
o
z
z
o
>-<
Eo<
P-
o
"A"
ATTACHMENT
w
as
Q)
a.
a.
<(
~"
Q) ....
o CG
o 0
<(CO
w
....
Q)
..c
E
Q)
:E
LO
~ --II
w
CG
Q)
a.w
a.....
<( g
o~
"<(
....
as"
o c
CO CG
~
Q)
..c
E
Q)
:E
,.....
Q)
:0
0) .-
c: l/)
.- l/)
~o
.- a.
m
~ gJ
o-~
>-Q)
a..o
E E
l/) Q)
<( E
o
o
:J
~a)>
~. s>> 8:;
:J a o.
co,
-:J
1J ::;; III
o lD -
CDCIl3
3,el.lD
-. lD 3
I!!..~ 0"
0' -. lD
... ~ Ul
co c 3
Cil lD
III CIl III
...... '<
lDm:J
... >< 0
0. 1J ...
lD III 0"
=:JlD
0"0._
~ :f 3lll
a cc _.
--.... -
o 0 jii.
:J ... ...
III lD ::E
:J :J ;:;:
0.3:J"
lD lD 8
:J 3 :J
co 0" CIl
:J"lD'"
CDUl2
;2. 3 Sl
:J -.
co~g
3 -.3
lD 3 lD
!a "0 ...
:J. ~ 5
CC"o.
...00
-. 0
3 :J 0'
lDCIlCC
CIllD'<
. :J-
CIl 0
C ...
CIl III
0""0
Ei
-lll
0._
:5" CIl
cc -.
:J
"0 <
a Q.
o s.
lD :J
CIlCC
CIl
"a" ;LNIIWH:JV;L;LV
"'tJ
a
..
o en
o III
3 3
3 lD
5 OJ
~~
sa.
3 3
III lD
7\3
lD 0"
c lD
"0 Ul
... :J"
lD -.
.o1='
5. CIl
... -.
lD 3
0.1J
~-
0'<
lD
1J ><
lD1J
o III
lD :J
:J 0.
...lD
... 0.
aO"
-. '<
o
...
:J"
Cil
lD
III
0.
0.
;:;:
o.
:J
I!!..
3
lD
3
0"
lD
Ul
-
a
3
...
:J"
lD
:J
o
:J
,
III
3
0"
C
a
o
-<
o
:0
m
o
-I
o
:c
d)
()
o
s:
s:
m
z
-I
en
0>
o ~~
~ ~~
:3 (I) 5"
[ t~
Q) Q)
(i)Q.
OlO
o ....
a~
i
Q)
(i)
QllI
~
-.
~
(;J
Q)
::J
Q.
~-/~
~~o'
< <
_. _. lD
CIl (I) CIl
o 0 at
Ul Ul c-
::EO"=
o '< ~
C III III
a:o.:J
0.
III -. )>
Slc5~
~a~
:J"lD)>
lD~1J
)>"'1J
o ... lD
o :J" III
lD Cil -
(I) lD CIl
(I) OJ
)>30
"0 lD III
~5-a.
I!!..lD.9"
CIl Ul ~
OJ-I!!..
o ... lD'"
'" 0 ...
OM 3 -.
... :J
p.....cc
:J"...
lD :J"
o.lD
CiS" 0
III C
0"'"
-Cil
lD :J
0....
8 3
3 III
3 ~
C '
:J C
~~
-. -
... ...
:J":J"
lD lD
OJ OJ
o 0
III III
... ...
0.0.
o 0
- -
)>)>
"0"0
1J~
lD III
III _
(ij"CIl
$20 All
o
"'0
-l
o
Z
z
o
!'?
z
o
:XI
m
)>
~
z
Ii>
o
C
:XI
:XI
m
z
-l
OJ
o
)>
:XI
o
o
"TI
)>
"'0
"'0
~
r
en
IlO
)>
~
en
o
:XI
en
3!:
m
3!:
ttI
m
:XI
en
:::I:
"'0
ATTACHMENT "c"
.,
119956.5
HOUSING
Dlv.13
Ubrary Referencea
Municipal CofllOralionl "269(4). 661. 756. CJS. Municipal CofllOratlons H 783. 794.
761. 1048. 1686.
WES1l.A W Topic No. 268.
N_ of Declalona
r.quir.. all curbs and sidewalks to be con.
ItNcted 10 .. \0 be usable by phylically dil-
sbled perlOnl; such requlremenll apply to
curbl and lidewalks Intended for public UIC
whether constructed with public or private
lundl and re.ardle.. of where localed. 5~
OpI.AlIy.Clen. 186. 4-16-74.
~ ..... appbcatlOD 1
I. CoaatnoctlOD and application
This section. when read in conjunction with
the 1971 amendmentlto Qov.C. t 44SO el ICq.
J 19957. Exceptlona from literal requlrementa of atandarda and apeclfl-
.... catlona In hardahlp, etc., cuea
In cases of praclical difficulty. unnecessary hardship, or extreme differ-
ences, a building department responsible for the enforcement of this part may
grant exceptions from the literal requirements of the standards and specifica-
tions required by this part or permit the use of other methods or materials,
but only when it is clearly evident that equivalent facilitation and protection
are thereby secured.
(Added by 8tats.1969, c. 1560. p. 3166. ~ 1, operative July I, 1970.)
f 1 19957.5. Local appeal. board. Jurisdiction. member.; dutle.
(a) Every city, county, or city and county may appoint a local appeals
board composed of five members to hear written appeals brought by any
person regarding action taken by the building department of the city, county,
or city and county in enforcement of the requirements of Ihis part, including
the exceptions contained in Section 19957.
(b) Two members of the appeals board shall be physically handicapped
persons, two members shall be persons experienced In construction, and one
member shall be a public member.
(c) The appeals board shall conduct hearings on written appeals made
under subdivision (a) and may approve or disapprove interpretations of this
part and enforcement actions taken by lhe building department of Ihe city.
county, or city and county. All such approvals or disapprovals shall be final
and conclusive as to the building department in the absence of fraud or
prejudicial abusc of discretion. The appeals board shall adopt regulations
establishing procedural rules and criteria for the carrying out of its dUlies
under this part.
(Added by Stats.1976, c. 700, p. 1714, ~ \.)
218
~-JJ
RESOLUTION NO. 17J,/, y;'
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
SOLICIT RESPONSES FOR A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP) FOR $5,000 IN CONSULTING SERVICE TO
DEVELOP AND PROMOTE AN ALTERNATIVE FUELS
RETROFIT REBATE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, consulting services to promote and develop the
retrofit rebate program will be selected through the RFP process;
and
WHEREAS, the RFP process will consist of competitive bids
with the most qualified applicant selected; and
WHEREAS, the selected consultant will develop and
distribute promotional material regarding the availability of
rebates and shall also develop a public outreach campaign to local
businesses through announcements and notices for the duration of
the rebate program; and
WHEREAS, secondly, the consultant will be required to
acquaint interested parties with the benefits of alternative fueled
vehicles and their relationship to improved air quality and reduced
reliance on petroleum powered vehicles; and
WHEREAS, finally, the consultant will attempt to
influence a reduction of the reliance of local residents on
petroleum powered vehicles as a primary form of transportation for
work destinations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the City Manager to
solicit responses for a Request for Proposal (RFP) for $5,000 in
consulting service to develop and promote an Alternative Fuels
Retrofit Rebate Program.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Barbara Bamberger, Environmental
Resource Manager
Bruce M. Boogaard, city
Attorney
C:\rs\CEC.1
7C-/
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item <;(
Meeting Date 09/27/94
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION 17 J.t.1 ACCEPTING THE 1993/94 GRANTEE
PERFORMANCE REPORT AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL TO
THE U.S DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE DOCUMENTS ~ I
Community Development Director 0
City Manager1:1~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No x.J
Council Referral No.
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The City annually submits a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) to the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The GPR provides detailed information on the use
of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds including the progress achieved and the
status of funds. HUD reviews the GPR and evaluates whether the City has carried out its
activities in accordance with the City's 1993-96 Community Development Plan and federal
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution accepting the 1993/94
Grantee Performance Report and authorizing its submittal to HUD.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Grantee Performance Report (GPR) states, for each project, the amount of CDBG funds
expended, the amount of funds remaining, and the progress achieved on each project. The City
expended $2,192,872 in CDBG funds during 1993/94 and had a balance of $935,300 as of June
30, 1994.
The GPR also includes an assessment of how well the City met its Community Development
objectives; demographic information on the people who derived direct benefit from CDBG-
funded human services programs; and a summary of the City's Fair Housing Program activities.
FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact.
~;'/
RESOLUTION NO. 17 t, ~ 'j
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
THE 1993/94 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMISSION TO
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista receives Community Development Block Grant
funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for the
implementation of programs and projects to benefit low and moderate income persons and aid
in the prevention of slum and blight; and,
WHEREAS, the City is required to submit annual Grantee Performance Reports to HUD
to report on the progress achieved and the status of funds; and,
WHEREAS, the 1993/94 Grantee Performance Report has been prepared according to
HUD regulations and instructions;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section I. The City Council hereby approves the 1993/94 Grantee Performance Report,
attached hereto.
Section 2. The Community Development Director is hereby authorized to submit the
1993/94 Grantee Performance Report to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
Section 3. This resolution shall take and be in full force and effect immediately upon the
passage and adoption hereof.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution;
shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute
of the passage and adoption hereof in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed
and adopted.
Presented by:
@L<-~~ -'
Approved as to form by:
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
0' )...
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM 1
MEETING DATE '9/'B/94
\O/~/q~
\
.
SUBMITIED BY:
Resolution 17/, 70 accepting Federal Department of
Education, Library Services and Construction Act Title VI
Library Literacy Pro~ram grant funds awarded to the
Chula Vista Literacy Team, appropriating funds, and
amending the FY 1994-95 budget to include .83 FTE
positions.
Library Director ~
City Manager~~1b (4/5ths Vote: YES -1L NO->
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
The Chula Vista Public Library has been awarded $34,720 in grant funds for
the Federal fiscal year 1994-95, under Title VI of the Library Services and
Construction Act, Library Literacy Program. These grant funds cannot be used
to supplant the current tutor reading program.
.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution accepting Federal
Department of Education, Library Services and Construction Act Title VI
LJbrary Litera~ Proiram grant funds awarded to the Chula Vista Literacy
Team, appropriating funds, and amending the FY 1994-95 budget to include
.83 FTE positions.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On December 8, 1993 the
Library Board of Trustees voted to support this Title VI grant application.
(ATTACHMENT A.)
DISCUSSION:
On December 14, 1993, the City Council ratified the report on the Library's
application for LSCA Title VI grant funds. The funds will be used to develop
and implement a model program to identify and aid adult learners with
dyslexia. The program will involve training for 60 volunteer tutors in the use
of instructional materials and techniques specially designed for this
population, as well as extensive follow-up support. All particip~ts will be
pre- and post-tested to determine the model's efficacy. A .70 FTE Instructor
will be hired as well as a .13 FTE clerical aid. Additional funds will be used to
develop training and promotional materials.
FISCAL IMPACT: These funds cannot be used to supplant the existing tutor
reading program, however $3,690 (FY '94-95) and $1,230 (FY '95-96) in salaries
and benefits budgeted in this Title VI grant are available to offset general
funds for the Chula Vista Literacy Team Coordinator. Funds will be
appropriated into account 260-2617. (See Attachment B.)
.
9-/
RESOLUTION NO.
/767t?
~
,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION
ACT TITLE VI LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRAM GRANT
FUNDS AWARDED TO THE CHULA VISTA LITERACY
TEAM, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND AMENDING THE FY
1994-95 BUDGET TO INCLUDE A .83 FTE POSITIONS
WHEREAS, the Chula vista Public Library has been awarded
$34,720 in grant funds for the Federal fiscal year 1994-95, under
Title VI of the Library Services and Construction Act, Library
Literacy Program to develop and implement a model program to
identify and aid adult learners with dyslexia; and
WHEREAS, these grant funds cannot be used to supplant the
current tutor reading program; and
WHEREAS, on December 8, 1993, the Library Board of
Trustees voted to support the Title VI grant application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept the Federal Department
of Education, Library Services and Construction Act, Title VI
Librarv Literacv Proqram grant funds awarded to the Chula vista
Literacy Team.
~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $34,720 is
hereby appropriated from the California Library Services Act Fund
into Fund 260-2617 and the FY 1994-95 budget is amended to include
a .83 FTE position, as set forth in Attachment B, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
David Palmer, Library Director
Bruce M. Boogaard, City
Attorney
C:\rs\TitleVI
~
9'~
'.
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
- 3 -
DECEMBER 8, 1993
5,
Name
Director Palmer reporteq that his goal of getting
this issue resolved by Christmas would not be met.
He asked that the Trustees be prepared to attend
the Council meeting when this item is presented to
support their recommendations, Chair Viesca and
Vice Chair Donovan asked to be notified when this
item is scheduled to go before Council.
III. NEW BUSINESS
A.
Literacy Team application for Federal Department of
Education, Library Services and Construction Act grant
funds to develop and implement a model program to aid
adult learners with dyslexia
Literacy Team application for Federal Department of
Education, Library Services ,and Construction Act grant
funds to continue a model writing program for adult
learners
B,
The Literacy Team has applied for two grants. One
application would set up a new program to work with adult
learners with dyslexia. This is a new program based on
the Literacy Coordinator's work with the Wilson Program.
The Coordinator has estimated that well over half of the
learners are dyslexic.
The other grant would continue the model writing program
now in place at the literacy team, The federal
department of education will allow the Literacy Team to
apply for two grants.
MSC (Alexander\Donovan) the Library Board supports both
literacy team applications for federal grant monies.
These prcgra~s not only provide a wonderful service to
the community, but also pay back the general fund.
IV. LIBRARY DIRECTOR'S REPORT
A. Holiday Schedule
Director Palmer reported that the Chula Vista Public
libraries will be closed on Friday, December 24th, ang
December 31st, as well as Christmas and New Year's Day~ '
9'3
AT! ACHMENT B
LSCA TITLE VI BUDGET
FEDERAL FISCAL YEAR 1994-95
October 1, 1994 - September 30, 1995
1
BUDGET ACCOUNT 260-2617
FY 95-96
5101 Salaries (reimburse general fund) $3,755.
.10 FTE Literacy Coordinator $2,816. $939.
5105 Hourly Wages $20,945.
.70 FIE Instructor $18,750.
.13 FIE Clerical Aid $2,195.
5141 Retirement $1,747.
.10 FIE Literacy Coordinator (reimburse general fund) $424. $141.
.70 FIE Writing Instructor (6.3%) $1,182.
5142 Employee Benefit Plan $600.
.10 FIE Literacy Coordinator (reimburse general fund) $450. $150.
5143 Medicare (1.45%) $310. ""'
.13 FIE Clerical Aid $35.
.70 FIE Instructor $275.
5145 PARS (3.75%) $83.
.13 FIE Clerical Aid
5201 Professional Services $5,500.
(Development of training and promotional materials)
5301 Supplies $1000.
5321 Instructional Resources $780.
TOTAL: $34,720.
1
9-'1
ITEM NUMBER:
9
RESOLUTION NUMBER:
/76 70
ORDINANCE NUMBER:
OTHER:
CONTRACT #:
CONTRACT/RESOLUTION DATE:
ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE WAS CONTINUED FROM
DATE:
AGENDA PACKET SCANNED ON:
NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO
DATE:
/tJ-q-CJ'f
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION: (TITLE OF CONTRACT, ETC.)
9-/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM It?
MEETING DATE 9/~;94
lo/'4IC\~
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Resolution ) 7&, 71 accepting Federal Department of
Education, Library Services and Construction Act Title VI
Library Literacy Program grant funds awarded to the
Chula Vista Literacy Team, appropriating funds, and
amending the FY 1994-95 budget to include .48 FTE
positions.
Library Directo~
t;;tJ
City Manager ;.r.,J1. (4/5ths Vote: YES.lL NO->
.
ITEM TITLE:
The Chula Vista Public Library has been awarded $34,986 in grant funds for
the Federal fiscal year 1994-95, under Title VI of the Library Services and
Construction Act, Library Literacy Program. These grant funds cannot be used
to supplant the current tutor reading program.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution accepting Federal
Department of Education, Library Services and Construction Act Title VI
Library Literacy Proiram grant funds awarded to the Chula Vista Literacy
Team, appropriating funds, and amending the FY 1994-95 budget to include
.48 FTE positions.
.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On December 8, 1993 the
Library Board of Trustees voted to support this Title VI grant application.
(ATTACHMENT A.)
DISCUSSION:
On December 14, 1993, the City Council ratified the Library's application for
LSCA Title VI grant funds. These grant funds will be used to continue our
Model Writing Project for Adult Learners. A variety of small group writing
classes for learners enrolled in the Chula Vista Literacy Team will be taught
in the evenings at the Civic Center Library, and at Vista Square Elementary
School. In addition, we will be offering daytime writing classes at two other
elementary school sites for parents enrolled in the Even Start Family Literacy
Project of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. Writing instructors (.48
FTE) will be hired to work throughout the grant period, October I, 1994
through September 30, 1995. Ail of the classes will involve recruiting and
training volunteer tutors as well.
.
FISCAL IMP ACT: These funds cannot be used to supplant the existing tutor
reading program, however $7,156 in salaries and $2,217 in benefits budgeted
in the Title VI grant are available to offset general funds in FY '94-95 for the
Chula Vista Literacy Team Coordinator and Administrative Office Assistant
II. In FY '95-96, $2,385 in salaries and $738 in benefits will offset general funds.
Funds will be appropriated into account 260-2618. (See Attachment B.)
~<f;4
IP./
~
~
RESOLUTION NO.
17/'7/
~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION
ACT TITLE VI LIBRARY LITERACY PROGRAM GRANT
FUND AWARDED TO THE CHULA VISTA LITERACY
TEAM, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND AMENDING THE FY
1994-9 BUDGET TO INCLUDE A .48 FTE POSITIONS
WHEREAS, he Chula vista Public Library as been awarded
$34,986 in grant fu s for the Federal fiscal ar 1994-95, under
Title VI of the Lib ary Services and Const ction Act, Library
Literacy Program to c ntinue our Model Wr' ing project for Adult
Learners; and
,BE RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vi a does he eby accept the Federal Department
of Education, Libr ry Services and Construction Act, Title VI ---.
Librar Lite ac ro ram grant f nds awarded to the Chula vista ,
Literacy Team.
be used to supplant the
WHEREAS, on Dece
Trustees voted to support
1993, the Library Board of
VI grant application.
BE T FURTHER RESOLVED tli t the amount of $34,986 is
hereby appro riated from the Californ'a Library Services Act Fund
into F nd 0-2618 and the FY 1994-95 b dget is amended to include
a .48 F position, as set forth in Att hment B, attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference as I set forth in full.
David Palmer, Library Director
s to form by
Presented by
Bruce M.
Attorney
, C~ty
'"""
/~"":J...
ITEM NUMBER:
/0
RESOLUTION NUMBER:
/76 ~/
ORDINANCE NUMBER:
OTHER:
CONTRACT #:
CONTRACT/RESOLUTION DATE:
ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE WAS CONTINUED FROM
DATE.
AGENDA PACKET SCANNED ON:
NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO
DATE:
!() - 7' - t17'
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION: (TITLE OF CONTRACT, ETC.)
/0-/
!):J--
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item II
Meeting Date 9/27/94
ITEM TITLE: Report on Multiple Species Conservation Program Financing and
Acquisition Strategy Principles
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ,;II
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~~l. (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.lO
In conjunction with the preparation of the Clean Water Program Multiple Species Conservation
Program (MSCP), in which the City of Chula Vista is a participant, a set of draft "Financing
and Acquisition Strategy Principles" has been released for review In addition, a listing of
potential funding sources to be pursued as part of the implementation of the MSCP was included.
These principles, and the listing of funding sources, were reviewed by the MSCP Policy
Committee on May 26, and were conceptually approved and referred to individual jurisdictions
for further review. On August I, the San Diego City Council reviewed the draft principles, and
recommended certain specific modifications to them.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council endorse the draft MSCP "Financing and
Acquisition Strategy Principles," as modified by the San Diego City Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Backl!:round
A draft Multiple Species Conservation Program Plan is being prepared in coordination with the
City of San Diego and other affected jurisdictions within the Clean Water Program service area.
The City of Chula Vista has previously approved a "Resolution of Intent to Cooperate" in the
preparation of this Plan, and has appointed Councilman Fox to serve on the MSCP Policy
Committee, which is providing overall policy direction in the preparation of this Plan.
As noted above, on May 26 the MSCP Policy Committee reviewed and released a draft set of
"MSCP Financing and Acquisition Strategy Principles." (It should be noted that Councilman
Fox was not present at this particular meeting). The intent of these principles is to set forth in
general terms the primary means by which land will be acquired in order to establish a regional
open space preserve system that will meet the biological goals and objectives of the MSCP. As
also noted, the San Diego City Council reviewed these draft principles on August 1, and
recommended two specific modifications to them (see Exhibit A) The first modification
proposed by the San Diego City Council is to add an introductory sentence indicating that all
//./
Page 2, Item / I
Meeting Date 9/27/94
components of the fInancing and acquisition strategy must be approved prior to or concurrent
with the adoption of the MSCP.
The draft principles indicate that there are three primary sources for either obtaining land
directly, or generating funds necessary to acquire land, for the preserve system.
1) new development of private and public projects;
2) federal and state governments; and
3) the existing local communities.
Principles 1, 2, and 3 of the Strategy address each of the major funding sources in turn.
1) Principle 1 indicates that land use regulations should continue to be utilized as the
primary means of obtaining land andlor financial assistance from new development.
2) Principle 2 states that the Federal and State governments have a responsibility to
participate in the fInancing of the MSCP, both in commitments of federal and state land,
and in providing financial assistance for acquisition of private lands.
3) Principle 3 indicates that the region has a responsibility to obtain funding from existing
development. However, it indicates that the region should commit to local financing
sources only after guarantees of federal and state participation are received.
The second modifIcation to the principles recommended by the San Diego City Council is to add
language to Principle 3 requiring that any new local funding source for habitat conservation
receive voter approval.
Principle 4 of the Strategy deals with the use of mitigation fees, which is a specifIc means of
requiring mitigation of new private and public development projects. This principle suggests
that there be coordination among jurisdictions in establishing mitigation fee programs (which
would allow project applicants to pay an "in lieu fee" for off-site mitigation of impacts on
habitats, rather than requiring direct purchase and dedication of off-site land), although it is
recognized that such programs could be administered by each individual local jurisdiction.
Principle 5 recommends that there be coordination among the local jurisdictions in addressing
the financial and fiscal impacts of establishing a regional preserve system.
In addition, a listing of examples of specifIc funding sources which can be considered for
inclusion in an implementation program for the MSCP is attached (see Exhibit A, Attachment
2).
//~.l
Page 3, Item 1/
Meeting Date 9/27/94
Analvsis
Staff has been involved in the development of the draft MSCP Plan through our participation on
the MSCP Working Group, and we agree with the overall direction provided in the draft
Financing and Acquisition Strategy Principles. We are aware of the serious economic and
fInancial implications raised by Principle 3, which involves consideration of local funding
sources, such as property taxes, sales taxes, special assessments, etc., and have discussed those
concerns with Council previously in relation to the SANDAG Regional Facility Financing Plan
and Interim Open Space Strategy. We feel that the same concerns which have been brought up
with regard to those regional fInancing planning documents should again be highlighted:
1) in considering the adoption of any regional facility fInancing program, consideration
should be given to the overall needs for regional facilities and infrastructure, including
transportation, criminal justice system facilities, and other regional needs in addition to
open space acquisition; and
2) in structuring any regional facility fInancing plan, consideration should be given to those
jurisdictions which already impose local development impact fee programs and other
similar requirements to meet local quality of life standards, in order to ensure that there
is equitable treatment among jurisdictions, and that affordable housing goals are not
ignored.
We feel that these concerns are generally addressed by Principle 5.
With regard to the changes to the draft principles recommended by the San Diego City Council,
we fmd that the proposed change to Principle 1 helps to focus the direction being provided in
the Principles, and emphasizes the importance of having an overall fmancing and acquisition
strategy developed prior to the fmal adoption of the MSCP Plan. With regard to the proposed
addition to Principle 3, we understand that the intent is that any decision to establish a new local
tax or fee for preserve system should be subject to voter approval, whether or not voter approval
is otherwise required by law. This approach seems reasonable to staff, in light of public
sensitivity to such revenue programs, and the need to ensure that there is a broad consensus
regarding the priority to be given to regional and/or local acquisition of open space.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Further analysis regarding the fIscal impacts of the
MSCP Plan will be provided with the draft Plan.
Attachment:
Exhibit A: Letter to Robert Leiter, Director of Planning, from Meryl Balko, Deputy Director ofMSCP Program,
~ated August 26, 1994, transmitting revised MSCP Financing and Acquisition Strategy Principles
~o't sC
(F:\home\planning\mscpfmc.all)
1/'?
EXHIBIT A
THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO
CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING. 202 C STREET. SAN DIEGO, CAUF. 92101
OFFICE OF THE
CITY MANAGER
236-6363
August 26, 1994
r'- .
.. -- -- --
C".i:":lO r; 1'"''
'IJ_I j~ ,,;:,~
[:' I
. -... ;~. .......;.
Mr. Robert Leiter, Director
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA. 91910
Subject: 'Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) - Financing and Acquisition
Strategy Principles
__ek
Dear ~J...eiter:
On May 26, 1994, the MSCP Policy Committee considered the Financing and Acquisition
Strategy Principles for the Multiple Species Conservation Program. The Committee conceptually
approved the five principles and recommended that the principles and the list of potential funding
sources be taken back to the individual jurisdictions for input prior to the Policy Committee
meeting of July 8, 1994.
The City of San Diego City Council considered the Financing and Acquisition Strategy
Principles on June 27, and approved the policy statements with amendments. The Mayor and
Council requested that the policy statements indicate that the local sources of funding should be
voter approved. It was also requested that a stronger statement be made that each of the major
component pieces be a part of the plan and be in place before the plan is finalized to ensure that
funding is not left to only one or two sources. The Principles were revised and approved by our
City Council on August I, 1994.
I wanted to let you know formally of this action and look forward to hearing what action your
Council takes on these Principles. The next Policy Committee meeting bas not been set, but is
expected in mid-October. .
~
Deputy Director
Attachments: 1. Financing and Acquisition Principles ,/
2. Potential Sources of Funds for Habitat Conservation 11-...:;
.
DIVERSITY
BRNGS us AU TOGETHE
MSCP Financing and Acquisition Strategy
PRINCIPLES
In order to ensure successful implementation of the MSCP all of the followin~ components of
the financin~ and aCQlJisition strate~y must be l\P.Proved prior to or concurrent with adQption of
the MSCP.
1. Private Dedication and Constraints
Land use regulations should continue to be utilized to provide for mitigation of the
biological impacts of new development.
2. Federal/State Contributions .
The federal and state governments have a responsibility to participate in the financing of
the habitat conservation program because the benefits are regional and national.
Participation should be in the form of commitments of federal and state lands and in
financing acquisition of private lands. Federal lands evaluated for incorporation should
include military bases, Bureau of Land Management property, lands held in trust by the
Resolu~on Trust Corporation and other sources.
Local Sources of FundslLand
The San Diego region has the responsibility to obtain broad-based funding from existing
development because existing development has historically displaced habitat and because
existing residents, businesses and other land uses will benefit from the preserve system.
However, the region should commit an appropriate share to implement the regional
preserve system only after guarantees of state and federal participation are obtained.
Additionally. it is recommended that any new local fundin~ source for habitat
conservation receive voter lIPproval. inc1udinl!: voter aP1)roval of any re~ional QpeD mace
bond measure.
3.
--
4. Miti~ation Fees
If mitigation fees are provided as an option in lieu of purchasing off-site mitigation lands,
the design of a fee structure should occur as a cooperative action among local
jurisdictions to assure equity and provide incentives to conserve lands of highest
biological quality.
S. Financial Imnacts
Local jurisdictions shall address the differing direct and indirect fiscal benefits and costs
of a habitat conservation program to resolve any financial inequities among jurisdictions
caused by implementation of the MSCP. These decisions need to be made in the conteXt
of regional public facilities and open space plans, in conjunction with consideration of
the regional habitat conservation program.
MSCP Policy Committee 5/26/94
City of San Diego, 8/1194 Adopted Revisions (underlined)
A1TACHMENT 1
-II--?
z
o
-
I-
<t
>
e::
w
(I)
:z
u..O
00
(1)1-
W<t
-JI-
Co_
~to
<t<t
x:I:
we::
wO
>1.1..
-(I)
1-0
~2
I-=>
(1)1.1..
31.1..
-JO
-en
fw
Coo
Oa:
en=>
:!:o
(/)
...r
<t
i=
z
~
Q..
>0
C .<>
_.g 8't:1-g I
o ~ q Q) E
_c: NC;) g
C ~ Il) ~ II)
C)., ODC 0
ECo ___0 M
>u o&U ~.
cg o~C) _S:!("'f
~g oco.o o~~
_ .:.~> !_oCI>
m ~ ~ ~ m - ~
:.i: Mo.E -.....
-_xo_~&s<o
5g~eCtl.~.geol-
"='~== c..!,D::: Q) .....;
dlla.o..9-om:;J~""'"
~.g.2- rQs:D_.....W
- -
2.e'O.
c:
o
~
1Il
.~
...
:E
...
(.)
III
Q.
.5
Q)
...
III
.!
~
Q.
iii
c:
o
01
Cl
a:
I
iii
CJ
o
...l
! _2:
.ec:c:~
- CD ::).-
c..cO-
O-E=
., Cl .. .~
ii 0 ~ c
ca E -:: ~
c:_ ..::;)
.---go
~ eo; ~ ~
= C):3 C)
-2~.~c._
I)g"-l~1:i
.= .., ~.!! t;
o:l~~
uc:O-"C
0.- CI'J Q) g
O~OD'"
~.2g2~
III
...
III
..
CI)
o
.! 'EN
"0 m':
eCC.~ ~
Sso""': 0
xtict= -
wQ.c~ 00
-;~.2CDr.
- .-....
c"CI to 'Ut"')
e5~~U)-
tl ...:: ::E ..
-c:C1--
fa 0 0 0
u.2uU1=.t-
-c- .-
ot;- .~.;
oos:O...tn
o ..._ofO >LIJ
_..D
.. ., I'>
U a:::l:. .
11
II>
'a
If
..
~
.... 0 Ii
i~ ~ ~
..~ ~ ~
W'D == I
'ii-;;i5N
CJ:. '" N 'AN
.. .. <;; "vo...
..- role
eu..!!,....c:ii
iicClI~O
~.gfilO :::'1-
.. - -.,
o:!ii":~t:
!'g.a;*>1ll
~~ti.
i
.,.
<:>
M
...
.
.
o
.0 M
)( U
LU'" ...
-p-..:
...- ~ :>
-,... G>'"
S 8 E ~
CN:::C
=~C):t:
Q) _ 0_
__~Il')
VI ..<N
<~ii0
"0 I- .-
c g I
Q~a.O
tIlc>(..?~
C) a. .. 0
~ e ~
I-c..t-.
~
o
N
N
...
oe.
-0
<~ i
ri.e '0
ocnClt1l')
a: m >N
-0'"
XUN-
~.=... B
....-0
x cr" 0.. I-
....1'> '" U "
NIIl"
Mci~(8
Cl
..
Ill. .
I
o
en
...
..
o
I-
~...:
- ..
>OW
.
O. - .., ~.
oc::<
.... -On. i
.. -:'oQ 8
... "'.tu
~ ~"'.a:'-
a.. ....,uuu.".
X NQ.!:WI
""0;"'..,-",,
_:so Ie'..t:; CO
II)<IO~"'N
c:;e:,....D>.2C1')
< ~.,. ~ 0 ",-
"0 .. ~ ~c-.J~ ~
c,...cQ,..EtJl-
O-:)(.)v.CD
C::O_=u>-c.":
! ci.<~ ~=.n
se
tne... .
.
.;
..-~ ,
.. -;;io
w-cg"D N 0
-~g;:g:: ~
8_..__~ ,
!i~':E CO
!! ...-!.c:~ ..
4:;;.IO-~-"
..e<zo.,.ti..
co ..'aocnolJ
....c!ii...~~
~jt ~ ~~g~
Zllii:rl,g,;
za:..a:. .
o
-
..
'"
e
.,
>
CO
g i
., 0
C) ~ CO
E'~ ..,.
~~=-a
'"Q~:Oo
" >0 I-
en ;JI..":: "
o=u;
ir~w
:;: 4 .
,.. !
. &l
oS....!! ~
~3tl ..
i::e~ ~
....lID -
.ca- ..-_
.. "e - Cl.
i~o.. l!o~
J:. -' ""
u..~ 1-"
.n~c ';0
1!~~i3.n=
~:E~t:.
-II'?
""
co
-
o
-
..
t>
-.
-
co
"J:.
co U
.... C
.. 0 co
'"')(cno
:: i! .:1.....
~ Do ~.J
>;jf:.O= tit
g_::)w
:3. .
i
o
co
.-
...
ti-
I> .0
5 So
-
u
"
;;
..
... ... ll)
c: ~ .....
= u.= -
_ -= >c ...
ct;cv_-
1:) -... 0.. Q
c::c'Ouo
~ = fJ) t-
;; "~ ;JI.:! ..:
.5g~o~
"co ...
.. c::
~ iI . ... .
-
C
.,
I'
a
e
::E
8
N
...
;s
::E
...
<:>
M
...
I
N
o
.-
...
iO
o
I-
.
...
..
""
I
Attachment 2
Pagel
,,;.
i
o
~.,
N
...
I
o
en
...
r;
-
o
....
:;;
w
~
o
.-
.-
...
..
M
...
'ii
-
o
I-
.;
Cl
-
o
C
co
c
t
co
~
o
..
u
..
..
=:
Oi
..
~
..,
=
-
..
w
15
::e
..
N
..
...
I
o
co
...
.'
iO
...
o
I-
,..
~
..
1
'is
Ii:.
...
..
""
MSCP-ILLUSTRATION OF
POTENTIAL USES AND SOURCES OF FUNDS
May 19, 1994
$Millions
USES OF FUNDS
Total Program Cost (a)
Including habitat acquisition, restoration,
and endowment for permanent operation
and maintenance.
$450 - $650
Total
~45.0 - $650
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Total
$80 - $124
$31 - $110
$90 - $250
$102 - $364
$303 - $848
~
Federal Programs
State Programs
Regional Sources
Mitigation Fees
Potentially Unfunded (b)
$0 - $347
Notes:
All figures in constant 1994 dollars; preliminary estimates subject to
change. See also accompanying notes.
a. Preliminary estimate by the CitY of San Diego.
b. Range of potentially unfunded conservation cost, based on a high
estimate of program cost and a lOw estimate of sources of funds.
//.. g-'
Attachment 2
Page 2
MSCP-NOTES TO
POTENTIAL SOURCES OF FUNDS FOR HABITAT CONSERVATION
May 19, 1994
The accompanying list includes potential sources of funds which may be applied in selected
combinations to finance habitat acquisition and maintenance under the MSCP. The list
illustrates the categories of sources and the appn)ximate amounts that may be raised. It is
!!Q1 intended to be .. financing plan for the MSCP, but only the potential components of such
a plan. The financing plan should be formulated by the local jurisdictions of the MSCP study
area, in coordination with the USFWS end CDFG.
The list of potential sources has been compiled based on discussions held with the MSCP
Working Group, the staff of federal and state resource agencies and agencies responsible for
the funding of habitat acquisition, the Jurisdictional Technical Committee of the Working
Group, and the City of San Diego staff. The estimates of funding amounts are based partially
on historical information, informal discussions with agencies, and, in the case of regional
sources, assumptions regarding tax rates and the forecast growth of the San Diego region.
All estimates, h?wever, are preliminary and subject to change, based on the outcome of
current planning efforts by the local jurisdictions.
The MSCP is one of three regional habitat conservation programs in San Diego County.
Financing of habitat acquisition and maintenance must be coordinated among all three
programs. The accompanying list of sources and funding estimates are for the MSCP,
assuming that additional and similar funding will be obtained by the other conservation
programs.
Estimated Total Program Cost. The total program cost has been preliminarily estimated by
the City of San Diego to be between $450 and $650 million. It is assumed that thiS budget
includes acquisition of privately owned habitat; acquisition of publicly owned habitat for which
compensati6n is required; habitat restoration; and establishment of an endowment fund to
operate and maintain the preserve system in perpetuity. A revised estimate of the total
program cost will be prepared. when a new focused planning area (FPA) has been defined for
the MSCP.
Federal Programs. There are numerous federal programs for habitat acquisition. Most such
programs are categorical grants, for which applications may be submitted by local
governments, state resource agencies, or other conservation organizations. In addition, recent
discussions between representatives of the MSCP snd the U.S. Department of Interior focused
on the possibility of establishing a long-term federal presence and support of habitat
conservation in the San Diego region, with the goal of ~arge-scale, multi-year habitat
acquisition to be conducted by the federal government. It is difficult to estimate the amounts
which may be made available through federal programs; the Department of Interior should be
requested to commit a target amount of funds or acres of habitat acquisition for inclusion in
the financing plan.
State Programs. The State of California has a number of categorical grant programs funded
from various sources. Of greater significance 8re potential, future bond acts for habitat i!Ind
J).. '7
Attachment 2
Page 3
open space acquisition. Propositions 70, 117, and the proposed Californians for Parks and
. Wildlife Initiative (CaIPAW-Proposition 180 on the June 1994 ballot) are examples of such'
bond acts. There are no assurances that CalPAW or other bond acts will be approved by the
voters; however. the potential for funding from such acts can be significant over the life of
the MSCP.
Regional Sources. It is recommended that the local jurisdictions of the MSCP cooperatively
obtain funding for habitat conservation from property texes, sales taxes. special assessments.
and other sources. The list includes the primary examples and the approximate proceedS of
bonds which could be Issued based on such sources. Although the sources are not mutually
exclusive, if more than one regional source is used, then the amount raised per source will
likely be reduced. The use of tax increment under Infrastructure Financing District
(Government Code Sec. 53395) is simil\!lr to. but distinct from. tax Increment financing under
the Community Redevelopment Law. An Infrastructure Financing District may be established
in areas of new development. with specified tax increment revenues used to finsnce public
Infrastructure improvements. including the acquisition of open space.
Private Impact Mitigation Fees. The local jurisdictions may individually or cooperatively adopt
mitigation programs consisting of off-site mitigation for impacts to habitat or payment of
mitigation fees in coordination with off-site mitigation. It Is estimated tha! there are between
49.000 and 74.000 acres of privately owned. unconstrained land supporting coastal sage
scrub. chaparral. and grassland outside the focused planning area IFPA), 'Assuming that 70%
of these lands would be subject to mitigation fees. if adopted. results in 34.000 and 62.000
acres. Depending on the conservation program adopted. off-site mitigation or revenues from
mitigation fees or both may be used to purchase .and dedicate habitat inside the FPA. In
addition. there are 22,000 to 27.060 of privately owned. unconstrained land with disturbed
habitat or agriculture. which may be developed through build out.
/1' /~
Attachment 2
Page 4
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
//J.
9/27/94
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION 17t 7.2. Waiving the Consultant
Selection Requirements and Authorizing the Mayor to
Execute the First Amendment Extending Contract No.
C094-082 Not to Exceed $55,000 for Solid Waste
Consultant Services with Brown, Vence and
Associates (BVA), and Appropriating Funds Therefor
Deputy city Manager Krempl _ ~
principal Management Assistant Snyder~
City Manager G~j~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes-L No_)
TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
At the 6/7/94 meeting, Council approved a $25,000 contract with
Brown, Vence and Associates (BVA) for specialized solid waste
consultant services related to the first phase development of a
transfer station and materials recovery facility (MRF). Services
under this contract have been provided at the City's discretion and
paid for on a "time-and-materials" basis. There is about $4,000 in
funds remaining in the current contract.
If the city desires to have future services available, an extension
of contract funds will be necessary in the near future. This
amendment appropriates $30,000 in additional funds for services
which can be projected to be provided to the City at least through
the end of this calendar year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
DISCUSSION:
Not applicable.
BVA has provided the city with solid waste technical expertise
since October 1993 through three previous contracts and one
contract extension directed by the City Council as follows:
~ Services
Aoorooriation
Exoenditure
10/19/93 RFP Development
$17,000
$16,022.29
3/1/94
Proposal Evaluation
& Economic Analysis $24,850
$24,839.06
5/10/94
Extension to 3/1/94
Contract $10,000
$ 7,000.00
6/7/94
Contract Negotiation
& Tech. Services $22.000
TOTALS TO DATE
$73,850
(Est.) $25.000.00
(Est.) $72,861.35
/,;.. w I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
/J.
9/27/94
The services which have been provided by BVA during this last
contract period have included:
o Participation with city staff in negotiation sessions with
Sexton establishing business terms for siting, permitting and
design services
o Review and evaluation of the Sexton business terms
o Review and comments on the Solid Waste Authority's rate
report (prepared by Deloitte & Touche)
o Assistance in
Proposal/Information
contract services.
preparation of the
on Local Enforcement
Request
Agency
for
(LEA)
It is difficult to clearly predict all of the specific tasks that
the city will need BVA's assistance for over the next few months.
The breadth of services needed will be driven by decisions made by
the City regarding short-term alternatives to the Authority's
system, as well as progress on the transfer station as a longer-
term alternative. Attachment A is a letter from BVA on a possible
scope of tasks and estimated budget of up to $30,000 which could
cover the following services:
o Assistance with detailed transfer station site selection
o Design issues for the transfer station and MRF
o Economic analysis for comparative systems as needed
o Project management and technical assistance
o Attendance at meetings as requested
Attachment B is a recommended amendment for continuation of
technical consulting services with BVA in an amount not to exceed
$30,000. All services would continue to be provided as directed by
the City and billed on a "time-and-materials" basis using the rate
schedule currently included in the existing contract. If the full
range of these services is eventually determined to be necessary
and there is significant action in the coming months requiring this
highly specialized expertise, this contract amendment can be
expected to cover the City's needs at least until January 1995.
It is also recommended that the consultant selection requirements
be waived and this contract be extended because of BVA's
involvement with the project to date, understanding of the issues,
ability to respond quickly, and documented reliability for
performance and quality results.
/.2. .. .l..
Page 3, xt_
Meeting Date
J~
9/27/94
FXSCAL XMPACT: The fiscal impact of this action would be an
appropriation of $30,000 from the Waste Management Trust Fund to
100-0210-5201. The Waste Management Trust Fund includes, in part,
monies received in FY 1991-92 as part of a settlement with Laidlaw
Waste Systems, Inc. to be used for the general purpose of the long-
term stabilization of trash disposal rates. At the present time,
the Trust Fund has a balance of approximately $96,000, of which
$53,000 are discretionary funds which could be used for the purpose
of this contract.
Expenditure of all of these contract funds would amount to a
cumulative payment for consultant services to BVA of approximately
$102,900 since October 1993.
J.2-;J /1:;.,1-
RESOLUTION NO. J7t7:L.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION
REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE THE FIRST AMENDMENT EXTENDING CONTRACT
NO. C094-082 NOT TO EXCEED $55,000 FOR SOLID
WASTE CONSULTANT SERVICES WITH BROWN, VENCE
AND ASSOCIATES (BVA), AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS
THEREFOR
WHEREAS, at the 6/7/94 meeting, Council approved a
$25,000 contract with Brown, Vence and Associates (BVA) for
specialized solid waste consultant services related to the first
phase development of transfer station and materials recovery
facility (MRF); and
WHEREAS, services under this contract have been provided
at the City's discretion and paid for on a "time-and-materials"
basis with about $4,000 in funds remaining in the current contract;
and
WHEREAS, if the City desires to have future services
available, an extension of contract funds will be necessary in the
near future; and
WHEREAS, this First Amendment appropriates $30,000 in
additional funds for services which can be projected to be provided
to the City at least through the end of this calendar year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby waive the Consultant Selection
Requirements and authorize the Mayor to execute the First Amendment
Extending Contract No. C094-082 not to exceed $30,000 for Solid
Waste Consultant Services with Brown, Vence and Associates.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $30,000 is hereby
appropriated from the Waste Management Trust Fund (270) to Account
100-0210-5201.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard, city
Attorney
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
C:\r8\BVA,1st
/.2~ /12-6
Attachment A
~~~
~~=~
Brown, Vence
& Associates
September 9, 1994
Energy and
Waste Management
Ms. Stephanie Snyder
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Engineers
120 Montgomery Street
Suite 1000
San Francisco CA 94104
BV A Job No.:
SUBJECT:
93032.02
Budget
415/434-0900
415/956-6220 FAX
Dear Stephanie:
At your request, I have examined BVA's draft scope of work for assistance that the City may need
over the next couple of months and developed a preliminary cost estimate for these services. To
prepare a preliminary cost estimate, we considered providing services in the following areas:
· LEA proposals
· Site selection
. Design basis
. Negotiations with Authority
. Economic analysis
. Project management assistance
. Technical assistance
. Meetings
Our preliminary estimate for services is approximately $30,000 including a 20 percent contingency.
A detailed budget is attached. As I indicated to you, it is difficult to estimate the specific scope and
cost of our services as many of the activities can not be thoroughly defined at this time. Therefore,
the actual budget for these activities will likely be modified at the time the City requests the specitic
tasks.
Weare interested in the opportunity to continue providing assistance to Chula Vista. If you have
any questions regarding the scope of work and budget presented in this letter please contact me or
Tracy Swanborn.
Very truly yours,
BROWN, VENCE & ASSOCIATES
;
Thomas D. Vence
Vice President
Printed on
ReCYCled
F:\SW\93032_ 02\CORRBS\SPTSBUDGT.LTR:9Sep94
Paper
I~" ?
09-21-94 10:07AM FROM BROWN, VENCE ~ ASSOC TO CITY OF CHULA VISTA P002!002
~ '1'".
ATTACHMENT
PREUMINARY ESTIMATE FOR SERVICES
'I
1. LEAT_AssIstance
ReIIlew p-opouls received
2. 3118 Seleo1on
AssIlIt in in-clepth evallll6m of lhreelliles
3. Design Basis (11I\IIew SexIon desllJl1nfo.)
4. Prolect mll'1egllment as1IlIIlrn:e
6. TechnictII M8ielIInoe
4
TAB Total To""
$90.00 HcM.n ...Cost
8 12 $1,21.10
12 18 $1,920
28 40 $4,200
24 38 $3,840
38 56 $5,940
4'-"""", .'1' ."L..:... ......~....' ......llliI'..... ._.....1.,
i".~"'7':\20 n?IQ~ $4,600
~ $820
TDV
$140.00
Task ActiVitY
6
12
12
18
'')0.~;' l..r<!.:.
6...MI1G~911ln ~\Ii~(i!I\ln!l \WI) .,..P.Bllnge) ......
'0. 0. r\~ml!!"rm 1,'NJ.r' '.. ,'\,o~r(. TO (:.'1' r~ ~r
',j , npre~tlme!'~J ' " " ~"
~ .
Tola! Labor
74
138
210
$22,600
JUlQ
Expenses (Includls two mee1lng and misc.)
Eslimaled Cost
OonIIngelKlV{2O pewenO
TolIII__...
$25,100
~,llZl--
$30,'2'?
F:~02\CTC.WK3 21 -Sep-94
I~-r
Attachment B
~irst Am.ndm.nt to Agr....nt b.tw..n
City ot Chula Viata
and
Brown, Venoe and Aasociat.s
tor Solid wast. Consulting s.rvic..
This first amendment to the agreement ("Agreement"), dated
September 22, 1994 for the purposes of reference only, and
effective as of the date last executed, is between the City-related
entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2 of the Agreement
dated May 25, 1994, as such ("City"), whose business form is set
forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3 of the Agreement, and the entity
indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 4 of the Agreement, as
Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A,
paragraph 5 of the Agr.ement, and whose place of business and
telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6
("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts:
Recital.
Whereas, on May 24, 1994 the City Council directed staff to
negotiate a contract with the Consultant for negotiation services;
and,
Whereas, on June 7, 1994 the city council waived the
consultant selection requirements and authorized the Mayor to
execute a contract with the Consultant not to exceed $25,000 for
solid waste negotiation and monitoring assistance; and,
Whereas, in accordance with the terms of that Agreement known
as Contraot No. C094-082, Consultant has provided specialized solid
waste consultant services for the negotiation of a contract for
first phase development of a transfer station and materials
recovery facility and related solid waste technical assistance as
directed by the City; and,
Whereas, the City desires to continue solid waste technical
consulting services, the scope of which are described in Exhibit C
of the Agreement, and which will require an extension of funds for
future services; and,
Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can
continue to prepare and deliver the services required of the
Consultant to City at City'S discretion as provided in the
Agreement and its attached Exhibits; and,
1.2-7
11
Obliqatory provisions
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city and Consultant do
hereby mutually aqree that this section of the Aqreement will be
amended as follows:
Exhibit A, paraqraph 11 (C):
(1) (x) Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials
Arranqement
Notwithstandinq the expenditure by Consultant of
time and materials in excess of said MaximUlll Compensation
amount, Consultant aqrees that Consultant will perform
all of the Defined Services herein required of Consultant
for $55,000 includinq all Materials, and other
"reimbursables" ("MaximUlll Compensation").
First Amendment to Aqreement with Brown, Vence and Associates
paqe 2
)~ -jtJ
siqnatur. Page
to the rirst am.n4m.nt to
Agr....nt I).tw..n the City of Chula Vista and Brown, V.nc. and
Associat..
for Solid .ast. Consulting s.rvic..
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this
First Amendment to the Agreement thereby indicating that they have
read and understood same, and indicate their full and cOlllplete
consent to its terms:
Dated:
city of Chula Vista
By:
Tim Nader, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
Dated:
Brown, Vence and Associates
By:
'l'homas D. Vence, Vice-President
First Amendment to Agreement with Brown, Vence and Associates
Page 3
1.2-//
\,\0
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I J
Meeting Date 9/'1.7/94
ITEM TITLE:
Report regarding the building pennit activity over the past year as it relates to
implementation of Transportation Development Impact Fees
Director of Public Works ~
Director of Planning ;tl!"&
City Manager Gt11"
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X )
Council Referral /#'1.830
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
In December of 1993 Council adopted an ordinance establishing a fee for Interim SR-125 and also
increasing the TransDIF fee which would not become effective until Jan. I 1995 Staff was directed
to return in ten months to advise on the experienced growth rate and whether the fee should be
implemented prior to January I, 1995 While it isn't necessary to raise the fee prior to January I, 1995,
delaying it beyond that date would have negative impacts on the program requiring higher fees for
future permits.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and leave in place Ordinances 2579 and 2580
which enact the Transportation DIF and SR-125 DIF fees beginning January I, 1995
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On November 9, 1993, Council held a public hearing regarding a proposed update to the Transportation
Development Impact Fee (TDIF) and proposed enactment of an interim pre-SR-125 Development
Impact Fee (SRI 25DIF). At that hearing, Council received testimony that the state of the local
economy was such that the increased fee would place substantial burden on construction at a difficult
time. The suggestion was made to postpone collection of the new SRI25DIF fee and the revised TOIF
fee until January I, 1995
The suggestion was accepted by Council with the reservation that, if staff saw the developers rushing
to obtain pennits before the fee changes became effective, Council might take action to move up the
effective date. Council then directed staff to report back in 9 months regarding the building permit
activity, and the likelihood that some developers might reach to avoid payment of the fee increase by
rushing building permits through before the effective date of change.
Attached is a chart showing annual residential building permit activity in the eastern territories from
1990 through 1993, and the first half of 1994 Other land uses, such as commercial or industrial land
uses are not included in these statistics, since they are often large projects that may overwhelm statistics
and mask trends. The "Power Center" project, for example, occurred during the slowest portion of the
four year study period.
As the chart shows, the level of residential construction activity during the early years of the recession
averaged 500-600 units per year, until 1992, when activity dropped off substantially This lower level
continued through early 1993 In the second half of 1993, when the fees were under consideration,
activity was just beginning to rebound. The first half of 1994 saw the issuance of 533 building permits
for a projected annual rate of 1,066. This is twice the average for 1990-91, suggesting that the housing
industry is indeed recovering.
13-/
1.\ \
Page 2, Item-.a
Meeting Date 9/27/94
Staff believes that there is sufficient evidence in these statistics to recommend that the TDIF update and
interim SR-125 fees be implemented on January I as currently enacted. Staff will monitor building
pennit applications through the next quarter, prior to implementation, and if applications increase
substantially, staff will likely return with a recommendation to enact the fees earlier.
In November and December 1993, when staff presented the revised TDIF and SR-125 reports, based
on effective date of January I, 1995, staff projected issuance of approximately 1,500 equivalent
dwelling units in 1994. This would include commercial/industrial uses. Staff believes that, given the
estimated 1,066 residential units currently projected and the commercialfmdustrial pennits issued in
1994, that the actual growth will be very near the projected, and therefore, does not recommend the
formal process of revising the fees from those currently enacted.
FISCAL IMP ACT: The impact of not raising the fees at this time is within the revenue forecast
anticipated in December 1993 and, therefore, there is no need to change the fee. The existing TransDlF
fee is $3,060 for a single family dwelling. That will increase to $3,998. The Interim SR-125 DlF will
be $820 for a single family dwelling. There is no fee now
The following chart shows the new fees and compares them to existing fees.
Fee Comparisons
Current Fee New New Total
Fee
Land Use TDIF Fee TDIF Fee SR-\25
Single Fam Detached $ 3,060 $ 3,998 $ 820 $ 4,818
Single Fam Attached $ 2,448 $ 3,198 $ 656 $ 3,854
Multi-fam Attached $ 1,836 $ 2,399 $ 492 $ 2,891
Commercial $122,400 $ 99,950 $20,500 $\20,450
Industrial $ 61,200 $ 79,960 $16,400 $ 96,360
Religious $ 12,240 $ 15,992 $0 $ 15,992
Oolf Course $ 2,448 $ 3,198 $0 $ 3,198
Med Cen1er $198,900 $259,870 $53,300 $313,170
Olympic Training entr $ 10,190 $ 13,313 $0 $.13,313
Attachments:
Sxhibit I -
~"'Exhibit 2 -
i1'~ Exhibit 3 -
tiJ Exhibit 4 -
~
~
Chart of Building Pennits
Impact Fee Report Addendum
11/9/93 Council minutes (cxceIpt)
Ordinances 2579 & 2580
CST:sb
File No: 1fV-037
m:\hcme~gwtda\tdif'pemu:lt
I :J . .;....
fa
The M.ncI>aI.CotJ1
SOUTH BAY .IlDlCI.M. Ol8TRICT
_v OF $AII_. .~ OF CAl.FOIlIlIA
100.0 _ AV1IIM!
CHULA YIllTA. CALIFORNIA _~
m( s~~~~:B]rn
CllY r';'.;u~, : (.'~ ft:tS
CHUU\ \}j';TA, CA
TELEPHONE
(818) 8111-4770
FACsaaE
(818) 811-4438
CttAMHRSOF
WUIAM S. CANNON
PRE8IDINQ JUDGE
September 1, 1994
Hon. Tim Nader
Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
RE: Board of Ethics
Dear Mayor Nader:
I have reviewed the applications for the Board of Ethics. I initially did not know what
you wanted me to do with them, but I now understand that you want my recommendation as to
who should be on the Board.
Joanne Carson and I served on the PJauning Commission at the same time, and I feel that
she is extremely intelligent, ethical, and carinJ. She will make art excellent Board member.
The remainder of the llppIiclqIts ale not knowntcnne, however, it appears that Richard
Schulman, Billy Kelley are well qualified candidates I have not interviewed any of the
applicants, and I do not feel that it is !t1P!opriate fur the judicial branch of government to make
appointments to legislative boards.
/~A. .., J
."",:,,"h';'d'''-.
t
.
~~~
~~;
"'"--==~""-
~--""
~ )(0 Q
'"
01Y OF
CHUlA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date: september 27, 1994
To: The Honorable Mayor and Members o~he City council
From: Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
Re: Board of Ethics Member Interviews
At your meeting of September 20, 1994, a substitute motion was
unanimously approved to continue the ratification of the
appointment of three prospective members to the Board of Ethics for
one week to allow the city Attorney time to review the ordinance as
it pertained to the judge's involvement.
I have now conducted that review and discussed the matter with
Judge Cannon and report as follows:
section 2.28.110(A) provides as follows:
". . .the city Council shall be required to submit the list of
candidates to the presiding judge of the South Bay Municipal
Court Judicial District and seek the judge's recommendation
with regard to appointments."
The section is silent as to the requirement to conduct an interview
and seems to permit, despite the past practice of having
interviews, the judge to base his recommendation solely on the
applications that have been filed with the judge. I have reviewed
the matter with Judge Cannon who advises that he, in fact, did
review all of the applications that were submitted to him and that
his letter of September 1, 1994, a copy of which is attached
hereto, reflects his three recommendations.
I, therefore, believe that the requirements of the ordinance, as
written, have been complied with by Judge Cannon.
However, remember that the judge's input constitutes only
recommendations and are not binding on the Mayor or Council. If
the council desires to have an interview process, the
recommendations do not have to be accepted and can be supplemented
by council interview or interviews by another independent member of
the community.
If the council wishes interviews to be conducted by the presiding
Judge, two factors will have to be taken into consideration:
1!P~ -a..-
276 FOURTH AVElCHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037
"
, f
The Honorable Mayor and Council
September 27, 1994
Page Two
(1) The ordinance does not require interviews to be conducted; and
(2) Neither Judge Cannon nor the other judges, all of whom he has
discussed this matter with, feel it is inappropriate for the
jUdiciary, for several reasons to be making recommendations on
candidates for the Board of Ethics.
If the judges refuse in the future to make a recommendation on
membership to the Ethics Board, no ordinance change can be enacted
that will require them to do so.
Alternatives include the following:
(1) Allow the council as a group to make an appointment (this may
neutralize political motivations);
(2) Same as No. (1) but require a supermajority or unanimous
support for membership to the Ethics Board (this would tend to
further neutralize political motivations on the Board);
(3) Give the council the power to request judiciary
recommendations for membership, but if the judiciary refuses,
then to obviate the need for jUdicial recommendation and have
the council make the appointment;
(4) Designate a non-municipal court judge third party recommender
as a person to make recommendations for appointment in the
same fashion that the judges had done, such recommender would
be selected by the Council on an ad hoc basis as the need
arises to fill a position on the Ethics Board.
In addition to the foregoing alternatives, there could be a host of
hybrid alternatives combining one or more of the four alternative
features.
At least for now, I think we can consider that the three people
that Judge Cannon recommended as having been recommended in
compliance with the Municipal Code, despite the fact that
interviews haven't occurred and refer the matter of how to deal
with the language change in the ordinance to the Ethics Board for
a report and recommendation back.
BMB: 19k
Ene.
~:\.~hi"\ludge.int
/ f.,a.:- 3
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
\t
" )
, ,
. .
e
The ~ \ricipal Court
SOUTH I.AY JUDICIAL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF I 'N OlEGO, aTATE OF CALFORNA
, +C THRD AVE_
CHULA \ IT.... CALFORNA t"IO.I117
......Ell. OP
WILUAII ., CANNON
.....--
Sel tember 1, 1994
Hon. Tim Nader
Mayor of the City of
CbuIa Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
RB: Board of Ethics
-ri-T-=Cijrnfil m
1\, l( ,::; I.. 'J 'I !( ~
U r------.. - '-1
~l ,'I
!l ! I ~p _ 8 i~~iil ~!..:J
", -- .J' ~
L_.___......... ~.
t:~\. ..:. .~. ,::'5
r,...~... '" ,.... ',,'
......:-- ------
TlUPHONI
1'11)"1-4770 I
..c..... \
I'It) ..1-4431 I
'-
,
Dear MaYOT NldSer:
J ha.,e reviewed the applications '.'or the Board of Ethics. I initially did not know what
yCll1 wante4 me to do with th~ln, but I nl'W understand that you want my reoommendation as to
who should ~ on the Board.
Joanne Carson and 1 served on the PlanninS Commission at the same time, and I feel that
she is extremely intellisent, ethical, an~ caring. She will make an excellent Board member.
The remainder of the applicants re not known to me, bowever, it appears that Ricbard
Schulman, Billy Kelley are well quali led candidates. I have not interviewed any of the
applic.mts, and 1 do .not feel that_t is apI -opriate for the judicial branch of sovcrnment to make
appointments to lesislative boards. ./
l/P~ - if
fIt-u-i(cJJ-'
~viwJ . ~
r
fLtl)J.)H
~~-~
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
TIM NADER
:~~~
~~=t-~
el1Y OF
CHUlA VISfA
July 7, 1994
The Honorable William Cannon
Presiding Judge
South Bay Municipal Court
600 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
SUBJECT: BOARD OF ETHICS APPLICANTS
Dear Judge Cannon,
Enclosed please find copies of the current applications on file with the City of Chula
Vista for the Board of Ethics. The Board of Ethics recommends standards of ethical
behavior for City officials, and reviews alleged violations of such standards.
The Board of Ethics has 2 vacancies at this time. In the past, the Presiding Judge of the
South Bay Municipal Court has reviewed, interviewed and recommended individuals to
serve on the Board of Ethics, so as to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest on
the part of City officials making these appointments. To that end, would you please be
so kind as to review and submit nominations to the Mayor's Office, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista 91910. If you have any questions, please feel free to give me a call at 691.
6044 or 425-8356.
Thank you for your assistance in this important role.
Sincerely,
JC /!.Jt..(,t.:
Tim Nader
Mayor
TN:pw
Encls.
ethics
276 FOURTH AVENUEICHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 81810/(818) 891-5044
/4:.~ -5
.
~'\tte
.,
(HULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
TIM NADER
August 4, 1994
The Honorable William Cannon
Presiding Judge
South Bay Municipal Coun
500 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
SUBJECT: BOARD OF F.TIIICS
Dear Judge Cannon,
Another member of the Chula Vista Board of Ethics, Janet Richter, recently resigned to
move out of the state. This brings to 3 the number of current vacancies on this 7-member
board.
If you could please revicw applications and make your recommend:1tions (It your earliest
convenience, it will facilitate our ability to fill these important commission seats in a
manner consistent with the need for impartiality on the Board of Ethics. If you have any
questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call me at any time.
We look fOlward to hearing from you soon. Hope all is going well with you.
Sincerely,
.]I:: /l~<.
Tim Nader
Mayor
TN:pw
Ends
p.s.
Enclosed is the application of Joanne Carson, to be added to the other applications
previou~Jy sent on July 7 We received Ms Carson's applicarion last week Thanks again
for your help
/~~-~
276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 9'910/~6191 69'-5044
_ _ _.. _ _ _ ~ w _ _ _ _. w _. ~ _ _ _~ ~ ~ _ __. _ _ _ ~ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ R. -.. - - - - - - -. - ~ - - - - - ~ - ~ - - - - --
--,