HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1994/11/01
Tuesday, November I, 1994
4:00p.m.
". declllre IIInder penalty of perjury that I ani
em\:llo'S'ed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Offlte of the City Clerk and that I posted
this A.genola!Notice on the Bulletin Board at C il Chambers
tha PUb~!Zt~ilding and at C.it ..Hall on bli oun,:, B ild"
DATED, ~." 'IGNED ~'Pu c ServIces u mg
Re lar eelin of e C't of Chula Vista C'
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CAB.:
Councilmembers Fox _, Horton _, Moore _, Rindone _, and
Mayor Nader _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: None submitted.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY None submitted.
*****
Effeclive April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any ./i!1!ll actions talcen in closed session and to adjourn the meeling.
Because of the cost involved, there wUl be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeling. However,
final aclions reported wUl be recomed in the minutes which wUl be availtJbk in the City Ckrle's Office.
*...*
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 10)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar wUl be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unkss a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak Fonn" availtJbk in the lobby and submit it to the City Ckrle prior to the meeling. (Compkte
the green fonn to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; compkte the pink fonn ta speak in opposition to
the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Cakndar wUl be discussed after Boom and
Commission Recommendations and Aclion Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the City Attorney reporting on actions taken from the Closed Session of
10/25/94. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed.
b. Letter regarding administrative policy on Il'l8 of sewer funds - Joseph W. Garcia, The People's
Lobby, 484 Fifth Avenue, Chu\a Vista, CA 91910. The City Attorney is preparing an opinion,
which will be distributed to Council Tuesday night. Continued from the meeting of 10/25/94.
Agenda
-2-
November I, 1994
c. Letter of resignation from the Economic Development Commission (ex-iltTicio) - Glen Lewis,
2226 B Wyoming N.E., Albuquerque, NM 87112. It is recommended that the resignation be
accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy
Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library.
d. Letter requesting waiver of any license requirements for Tiffany Pf A Craft Fair to be held
on November 19, 1994 - Marilee Castenholz McKelvey, Craft Pair Chairman, Burton C. Tiffany
Elementary School PfA, 1691 Elmhurst St., Chula Vista, CA 91913. It is recommended that the
waiver be granted.
e. Claims against the City: Claimant Number 1 - Prank Vega, and Claimant Number 2 - Margaret
Vega, c/o Raymond H. Wood, Attorney at Law, 1810 Palm Ave., National City, CA 91950;
Claimant Number 3 - State Parm Insurance Company, c/o Jamie Anderson, Senior Claim
Representative, 3232 Bonita Rd., Chula Vista, CA 91910; Claimant Number 4 - Thomas Baker,
c/o Charles S. Roseman, Attorney at Law, 401 West" A" St., Ste. 2350, San Diego, CA 92101.
It is recommended that the claims be denied.
6. RESOLUTION 17699 ACCEPfING DONATION OF FOUR (4) MICROCOMPUTER SYSTEMS
FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED
CHILDREN - On 10/1194, the National Center for Missing and Exploited
Children donated four microcomputer systems to the Police Department. The
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children is interested in assisting the
Police Department automate operations. The four microcomputer systems
include 286 processors, keyboards and monochrome monitors. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police)
7 RESOLUTION 17700 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COM-AID INC. FOR THE
PURCHASE,INSTALLATION, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF V ARlOUS
TELEPHONE SYSTEM HARDWARE COMPONENTS - Agreement with
COM-AID Inc. for the purchase, installation, and implementation of various
telephone system hardware components for the South Chula Vista Library. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Management &
Information Services)
8. RESOLUTION 17701 AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES ON SATURDAY,
DECEMBER 10, 1994 OR SATURDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1994 (RAIN
DATE) FOR THE CHULA VISTA DOWNTOWN BUSINESS
ASSOCIATION TO CONDUCT THE32ND ANNUAL STARLIGHT YULE
PARADE, AND WAIVING OF FEES FOR CITY-PROVIDED SERVICES
AND SUPPLIES - The Downtown Business Association is requesting
permission to conduct the 32nd Annual Starlight Yule Parade along Third
Avenue on Saturday 12/10/94 or, in case of rain, on Saturday, 12/17/94, and
is requesting various City-provided services and supplies. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
9. RESOLUTION 17702 ACCEPfING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF
TURF TRACTORS AND MOWING EQUIPMENT - Bids were received on
9/19/94 for the following equipment for Parks and Recreation: (1) One Turf
tractor with front mounted mower; (2) One Turf mower, four-wheel drive; and
(3) One Turf mower, two-wheel drive. Staff recommends Council approve the
resolution awarding the contract for Item lto Pauley Pord, Item 2 to Bob Hicks
Turf, and Item 3 to Western Turf. (Director of Public Works, Director of
Pinance and Director of Parks and Recreation)
Agenda
-3-
November I, 1994
10. RESOLUTION 17703 ACCEYfING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF
CAB AND CHASSIS WITH DUMP BODY - Bids were received on 10/10/94
for a Cab and Chassis with dump body for Public Works Operations. Staff
recommends Council approve the resolution awarding the contract to Dion
International Trucks, Inc. (Director of Public Works and Director of Finance)
· · END OF CONSENT CALENDAR · ·
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as pubUc hearings as required by law. [fyou wish to
speak to any item, please flJJ out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the labby aad submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete
the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are Umited to five minutes per
individual.
11. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING THE VACATION OF THE PORTION OF MOSS
STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH NAPLES STREET
WESTERLY TO ALPINE AVENUE, NORTH OF NAPLES STREET-
Country Club Villa Estates, owner of the triangular piece of property between
Moss and Naples Streets westerly of the junctore of those streets, bas requested
that the City vacate the portion of Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and the
aforementioned intersection. In accordance with the California Streets and
Highways Code, on 10/4/94, Council set the associated public hearing for
1111194. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public
Works) Time soecific at or after 6:00 D.m.
RESOLUTION 17704 ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF MOSS STREET
FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH NAPLES STREET WESTERLY TO
ALPINE A VENUE, NORTH OF NAPLES STREET
12. PUBLIC HEARING PCM-94-20/PCA-94-02; CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE
CITY LANDSCAPE MANUAL AND ASSOCIATED AMENDMENTS TO
THE MUNICIPAL CODE. CITY INITIATED - The Landscape Manual bas
been revised to include the water conservation measures called for by AB 325,
the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act. A copy of the draft Manual was
filed with the State in September, 1992, and a representative of the State
Department of Water Resources bas acknowledged the City's compliance with
AB 325. The Manual has also been updated to include standards for public
landscape installations, and to formally incorporate current landscape practices
from its last revision in 1978. Staff recommend~ the Duhlic heariJlll he
continued to 11/8/94. (Director of Planning)
13. PUBLIC HEARING ADOYfION OF THE SALT CREEK BASIN GRAVITY SEWER
ANALYSIS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SALT CREEK BASIN
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - The Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer
Analysis was prepared by Wilson Engineering to recommend sewer
improvements necessary to convey sewage flows from the Salt Creek Basin to
existing or proposed downstream sewerage facilities. Based on the Analysis, a
Development Impact Fee of $280 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit should be
established to pay for the facilities. Staff recommends the DubJic heariJlll he
continued to 12/6/94. (Director of Public Works)
Agenda
-4-
November I, 1994
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This Is an opportunily lor the general public to oddress the CiIy Council on any subject matter within the
Council's jurisdiction that Is !JJl1. an item on this agendD lor public discussion. (State law, however, generolly
prohibits the CiIy Councillrom taking action on any Issues not included on the posted agendD.) If you wish to
oddress the Council on such a subject, pkase compkte the yellaw "Request to Speak Under Oral CommunictJtions
Form" availabk in the labby and submit it to the CiIy Ckrle prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
pkase give your name and oddress lor record purposes and lollaw up action. Your time Is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
BOARD AND COMMTS."ION RECOMMENDATIONS
This Is the time the CiIy Council will consider items which have beenlorwarded to them lor consideration by one
01 the CiIy's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section 01 the agendD are expected to elicit substantiol discussions and deliberations by
the CouncU, stalf. or members 01 the general public. The items will be considered individuaUy by the Council
and staflrecomme1UlDtions may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, pkase
Jill out a "Request to Speak" lorm available in the labby and submit it to the CiIy Ckrle prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to five minutes.
14.A. ORDINANCE 2608
B. ORDINANCE 2609
C. ORDINANCE 2610
D. ORDINANCE 2611
E. ORDINANCE 2612
ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING CERTAIN TiME LlMlTATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
BA YFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (first readiDl!) - The purpose
of the ordinances is to amend all of the City's Redevelopment Plans to
incorporate certain time limits mandated by AB 1290 (and further refined in SB
732). The time limits pertsin to the establishment of indebtedness, effective of
Redevelopment Plans, and repayment of indebtedness. The legislation requires
that a Redevelopment Plan which either lacks the required time limits or which
contains time limits in excess of the maximums established by AB 1290 must be
amended by ordinance before the end of the calendar year to bring the plan into
conformity with the requirements. Staff recommends Council place the
ordinances on first reading. (Director of Community Development)
ESTABLlSHING AND AMENDING CERTAIN TiME LlMlTATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN
CENTRE I REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (first readiDl!)
ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING CERTAIN TiME LlMlTATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE TOWN
CENTRE II REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (first readiDl!)
ESTABLlSHING AND AMENDING CERTAIN TiME LlMlTATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE OTAY
V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (first readiDl!)
ESTABLISHING AND AMENDING CERTAIN TiME LlMlTATIONS
WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE
SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (first readiDl!)
Agenda
-5-
November I, 1994
IS.
REPORT
SANDAG SERIES EIGHT POPULATION AND HOUSING FORECAST
AND LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT - SANDAG has released for
public review a draft population and bousing forecast to the year 2oo5, as well
as a draft element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy which purposes
policies and implementation measures to minimize the impact of new
development on transportation systems, air quality, and open space. Staff
recommends Council forward comments to the SANDAG Board of Directors as
contained in the agenda statement. (Director of Planning)
16.
REPORT
UPDATE ON SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES - An oral report will be
given by staff.
17.
REPORT
UPDATE ON REGIONAL SEWER ISSUES - An oral report will be given
by staff.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This Is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items puUed at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Counclbnembers.
Public comments are limited to Jive minutes per Individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
18. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT IS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
19. MAYOR'S REPORT1Sl
a. Amicus letter to U.S. Supreme Court on right of State to limit welfare benefits of new residents-
direction to City Attorney Continued from the meeting of 10/25/94.
20. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Horton
a. Council discussion regarding consideration of extension of the current term for Chula Vista's
representative to the San Diego Unified Port District/Setting dates for interviews for Chula Vista
representative to the San Diego Unified Port District.
Agenda
-{j-
November I, 1994
CLOSED SESSION
Unless the City Attorney, the City MalUlger or the City CouncU states otherwise at this time, the CouncU wiU
discuss and deliberate on the foUowing items of business which are pennitted by law to be the subject of a clased
session discussion, and which the CouncU is advised should be discussed in clased session to best protect the
interests of the City. The CouncU is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of JilJJJJ action
taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by clased
sessions, the llideotaping wiU be terminated at this point in otder to save costs so that the CouncU's return from
closed session, reports of JilJJJJ action taken, and tufJoumment wiU not be llideotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of jilUll action taken wiU be recotded in the minutes which wiU be available ill the City Cleric's Ofjice.
21. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COIINSRL REGARDING:
1. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Govenunent Code Section 54956.9
. Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 1.
. City of Chula Vista vs. Solid Waste Management JPA (differential rate structure and
transfer station legal issues).
. Metro Sewer Adjustment Billing (prospective arbitration).
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Pursuant to Govenunent Code Section
54957
. Title: City Attorney
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
. Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, IAFF, Executive
Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Cbula Vista Employees Association (CVEA), Western Council
of Engineers (WCE), and International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF).
Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
22. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
ADJOURNMENT
Tbe meeting will adjourn to (a clused session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on November 8,
1994 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
.
A Joint Meeting of the City CouncillRedevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council
Meeting.
.;
October 27, 1994
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and Cit~r coun~~\
John D. Goss, City Manager---4 bvf.......-c
City Council Meeting of November 1, 1994
FROM:
SUBJECT:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting
of Tuesday, November 1, 1994. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as
follows:
5a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that the following reportable actions
were taken by the City Council at the closed session of October 25, 1994:
Authorized the expenditure of up to $60,000 for the City Attorney to hire an
attorney to litigate the Daley Rock Quarry lawsuit.
Reached a consensus to decline to participate in the continuation of the Special Act
District for the Sewer Wastewater Management Authority as a forum for the
continued negotiation of the sewer arbitration with the City of San Diego.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED.
Sb. This is a letter from Joseph Garcia regarding the City's policy on the use of sewer
funds. THE CITY ATTORNEY IS PREPARING AN OPINION, WHICH WILL
BE DISTRIBUTED TO COUNCIL TUESDAY NIGHT. (Continued from the
meeting of 10/25/94).
5c. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT GLEN LEWIS' RESIGNATION FROM THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET
AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY
ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE
PUBLIC LIBRARY.
5d. The Tiffany PTA is requesting a waiver of business license taxes for the craft fair
they are sponsoring at Bonita Vista High School on November 19, 1994. Section
5.04.075 of the Municipal Code authorizes the City Council to waive the business
license taxes for nonprofit or charitable organizations. Historically the City Council
has waived the business license taxes for similar events, requiring non-profit groups
to pay only for additional City staff services necessitated by the event. Since this
event will take place within the Bonita Vista High School gymnasium, no additional
City staff services will be required. AS IS CONSISTENT WITH PAST PRACTICE
OF THE CITY COUNCIL, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS WAIVER BE
GRANTED.
Se. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FILED BY
FRANK VEGA, MARGARET VEGA, STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY
AND THOMAS BAKER BE DENIED.
~~~
iiiitI!ii;
~~~~
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date:
October 26, 1994
To:
The Honorable Mayor and city Council
From:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 10/25/94
Re:
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the city
Attorney participated, the following action is reportable from the
Closed Session of 10/25/94:
Authorize the expenditure of up to $60,000 for the City Attorney to
hire an attorney to litigate the Daley Rock Quarry lawsuit.
In addition thereto, the Council reached a consensus to decline to
participate in the continuation of the Special Act District for the
Sewer Wastewater Management Authority as a forum for the continued
negotiation of the sewer arbitration with the city of San Diego.
BMB:lgk
C:\lt\c!osses8.927
~~)
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
~-1.\.-1-,I-}mJi
~~~~~VY~~~~~~~~~~~~~VVVV~VV~VV~VVVVVVV~VV~VVVVVV~V~VYVV~V~~~V~VVVVVVV~VVVVVV~VVVVVV~
DEDICArED fO GOVERNHENfAL. ENVIRONHENfAL. AND CONSUHER ISSUES
JOSEPH W. GARCIA. POUNDER
fEL:1(619}420-2535
PAX:1(619}427-7553
OCt 5. 1994
Tim Nader, Mayor of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca 91910
Mayor Nader:
This is in reference to an administrative practice which is
currently implemented by your City Council. Ci ty Manager.
Department Heads and the Finance Director for the city.
The sewer funds collected by the City of Chula Vista from
it's ratepayers, is ostensibly ear marked for sewer related
work projects, since it is a captive fund.
Sewer funds are being used by city administration, as a BANK.
from which to borrow monies for the implementation of a
shortfall in budgeted funds for the various departments.
That these funds are paid back with interest. must not be a
mitigation factor, in continuing this practice.
The following is an itemization of recent borrowed fund
transfers and their projected use.
$50,000.00 to Building and Housing, for a Permit
Tracking System, made in ,fiscal 1991-92.
$50,000.00 to upgrade the city's telephone system, made
in fiscal 1992-93.
$420,000.00 to a Capitol Project Fund, for widening
Otay Valley Road, made under Resolution 116706 of date
January 30, 1992.
$1,161,000.00 was approved under that same Resolution
#16706, though the transaction mayor may not have
taken place as yet.
The sum total of the above City Council and Staff action is,
that the sewer fees are much too high, for the intended use
of operating the sewer maintenance and improvement projects.
HAlLING ADDRESS: 484 PlP2 AVENUE, CHULA VIS2'A, CA 91910
s;;. . /
vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
DKDICArKD ro GOVKRNHKNrAL. KNVIRONHKNrAL. AND CONSUNKR ISSUKS
cont'd. (2)
JOSKPH W. GARCIA. POUNDKR
rKL:1(619)420-2535
PAX:1(619)421-1553
This then places the City of Chula Vista sewer Fees, on a par
with a Tax, and for which Tax would have necessitated the
approval of the voters of this community, which was not done.
This matter is herein brought to the attention of the City
Council and Staff, that the practice should cease, pending a
formal determination by the City Attorney, on the validity of
the city using sewer funds as a BANK for city operations.
That sewer fees should be scaled back to conform with their
intended use, by that particular department.
Borrowed monies should be repaid and restored to the sewer
accounts, at the earliest possible date. Surplus sewer funds
should be returned to the ratepayers from whom collected, and
that a determination be made as to the proper sewer fee
adjustment rate, collected for the purpose of administering
the sewer division of the city.
Request Mr. Mayor, that this letter be brought to the
attention of the City Council at open meeting, with
appropriate consideration and action taken therewith.
Rg;tfUllY, 11
_ L..I7; &>1 ~
Jo eph -I: Garci~ .
for The PeoDles Lobbv
copy to: Mayor-elect Shirley Horton
Bruce M. Boogaard, Esq.
City Attorney
Copy/files/cga
HAILING ADDRISS: 484 FI,rH AVKNUI, CHULA VISrA. CA 91910
..5b ~~
s.n.E.C.C
SAN DIEGO ECONOMIC CONVERSION COUNCIL
~ fo '-:;-1'-:;-,; .fn)
r-, n
j '1 III
j !.1!l
I D.C. T. - 3, " ; iU i
L . I, ~ !'U
. cliy';'...... -. .-.-.J
Cl,\t".. 0,>
-h LA \1:.":\ CA
September 20, 1994 !! -
:It
Mayor Tim Nader F I '"
City Hall (')
276 Fourth Avenue ;; '"
.~ :<
Chula Vista, CA 91910 "',...
~< "'0 '"
""Vi N 0
Dear Mayor Nader: I;: :.1
C)
Regretfully, I am submitting my resignation as an ex..officio
member of the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission.
Economic circumstances have forced me to take work temporarily in
Albuquerque, New Mexico.
I have spoken with Marcia Boruta, Executive Director of the
San Diego Economic Conversion Council and she is available to
serve on the Commission. SDECC is very interested in continuing to
work with the Commission on military conversion issues and the
development of the border environmental commerce alliance.
Sincerely,
~~
Glen Lewis
Cc-!ff?,7?('Ij
~~~
,
WRlnEN COMMUNICA rlONS
r 11 J?'/
j\foiJU,. Address:
SDECC
405 W Washington SI. #143
San Diego, CA 92103 USA
.
OIrJCe Location:
4452 Parl< Boulevard
Suite 205
San Diego, California
5c, -)
.
Telepbooe:
(619) 29S-8878
FAX:
(619) 29S-2298
BURTON C. TIl'I'ANY ELEMENTARY ~OOL PTA
1691 Elmhurlll !lreel
Chula Villa. California 91913
(619) 421-6300
October 15, 1994
City Clerk
Chula Vista City Council
P. O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912
.!! J! :II
~ fJ ~
~E III ~
cnr- <
ATTN: Mayor and City Council: ..~~ a fTI
For the tenth year, Tiffany Pl'A is hosting a craft fair to be held No~er it, 11C:/r1 /r;u \
1994, at the gymnasium of Bonita Vista High School, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.. '-' '/. I. jI
Handicrafters from San Diego County have been invited to participate-in this fair.
I request that the City Council waive any license requirements for the holding of
this fair, inasmuch as all proceeds will go into a general fund to be used by Tiffany
Pl'A on service projects and other programs to benefit the children of oui' school,
and the entire school community.
Thank you for presenting this on our behalf.
Sincerely,
~~c~
Marilee Castenholz McKelvey
Craft Fair Chairman
482-8806
Please send correspondence to Marilee at 1615 Gotham Street, Chula Vista,
CA 91913. Thank you.
8R. /.j) WRlnEN COMMUN1CATI~
C(>' _ /Jr-( ~ /n J;);j9Y
(~~.~ ~ ~ tf.u:-c- f~" J
~M7~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
3e~
ITEM TITLE:
Claims Against the city
Meet;ng Date 11-1-94
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of personnelGt$-
city ......r~ "'5~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No~)
REVIEWED BY:
Claimant No.1:
Claimant No.2:
Mr. Frank Vega
Ms. Margaret vega
c/o Raymond H. Wood
Attorney at Law
1810 Palm Avenue
National City, CA 91950
Claimant No.3:
state Farm Insurance Company
c/o Jamie Anderson
Senior Claim Representative
3232 Bonita Road
Chula vista, CA 91910
On October 17, 1994, Mr. Frank vega and Ms. Margaret Vega filed
claims against the City of Chula vista for personal injuries and
property damage they received in connection with a traffic cOllision
that occurred on August 26, 1994. The vehicle occupied by the vegas
collided with a Chula Vista Police vehicle responding to a priority
call. The vehicle occupied by the Vegas turned in front of the
approaching Police vehicle at Broadway and Naples. Both claims seek
damages of $350,000.00.
The Vegas claim our officer was responsible for the collision due
to negligent operation of a vehicle and excessive speed for conditions.
On October 17, 1994, the insurance carrier for the Vegas, State
Farm Insurance company, filed a claim for subrogation against the City
of Chula vista in connection with property damage resulting from the
August 26, 1994 collision. The notice of subrogation alleged the Police
Officer was the cause of the cOllision due to negligent operation.
Due to remote liability on the part of the City, it is the recom-
mendation of the City Attorney's Office and Risk Management that the
claims be denied.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
5e,!
'"
,>
.
Item
Meetinq Date 11-1-94
Claimant No. 4
Mr. Thomas Baker
clo Charles S. Roseman
Attorney at Law
401 West "A" street, suite 2350
San Dieqo, CA 92101
On October 4, 1994, Mr. Thomas Baker filed a claim aqainst the
city for personal injuries he received on April 4, 1994. The claim
seeks damaqes within the jurisdiction of the Superior Court in connec-
tion with an incident at "E" street and 1-5 overpass. Mr. Baker
alleqedly absorbed 12,000 volts of electricity when his equipment struck
an underqround cable.
The Claim alleqes the city is responsible because the incident
took place on land under the care and control of the city. The location
described in the Claim is actually under the maintenance and control of
CalTrans, not the city of Chula Vista.
Althouqh liability is remote, we are continuinq our investiqation
and it is desirable to start the statute of limitations. It is the
recommendation of our city Attorney's Office and Risk Manaqement that
the claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the above four claims.
Se ..tA
j 'l
, t,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM(.C)
l\'llJj,TING DATE 11/01/94
ITEM TITLE: Resolution \.., tA~ Accepting Donation of a Four (4)
Microcomputer Systems from the National Center for Missing and
Exploited Child~.
SUBMITrED BY, Chid 0' Polk< P tfJ!l
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~.:----: (4/Sth's Vote: Yes_ No-X.)
RECOMMENDATION: Accept donated microcomputer systems.
On October 1, 1994, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children donated four (4)
microcomputer systems to the Police Department. The National Center for Missing and
Exploited Children is interested in assisting the Police Department automate operations. The
four (4) refurbished microcomputer systems include 286 processors, keyboards and monochrome
monitors.
At the request of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the donated
microcomputer will be used to support department-wide operations.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: Purchase of new microcomputers can be deferred.
10-\ /6-l.-
RESOLUTION NO. ,.,Ie'Pt-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING DONATION OF FOUR (4)
MICROCOMPUTER SYSTEMS FROM THE NATIONAL CENTER
FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN
WHEREAS, on October 1, 1994, the National Center for
Missing and Exploited Children donated four (4) microcomputer
systems to the Police Department; and
WHEREAS, the National Center for Missing and Exploited
Children is interested in assisting the Police Department automate
operations; and
WHEREAS, at the request of the National Center for
Missing and Exploited Children, the donated microcomputers will be
used to support department-wide operations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby accept donation of four (4)
microcomputer systems from the National Center for Missing and
Exploited Children.
/At:C bo
/ Bruce M. B ogaa d, city
Attorney
form r
~
Presented by
Richard P. Emerson, Chief
of Police
C:\rs\co.puter,don
'o"~
COIJIIICIL AGBMDA STATBMBHT
Item
_ing Date
?
11/01/94
llBVIBWBD BY:
RBSOLUTION /? 7'" Approving Agreement with COM-AID
the purchase, installation, and implementation of
Telephone System Hardware Components
Director of Managemen~Information service~
Library Director
City Manag~~ ~ ...--e (4/Sths Vote: Yes_ NO..L)
The approved FY 1994-95 CIP includ~a project to construct the South Chu1a Vista
Library (LB125) and a project for telephone system upgrades (GG128). The new
Library facility will require thirty-five telephones to be located at the four
public services desks and at various offices throughout the facility which need
to be connected to the City's telephone switch located at City Hall. In order
to support these additional telephones, several pieces of hardware need to be
added to the City's telephone switch and thirty-five telephones must be purchased
and installed at the South Chula Vista Library.
Inc. for
various
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTBD BY:
RBOOHMBNDATION: That Council adopt resolution approving the agreement with COM-
AID inc. for the purchase, installation, and implementation of the necessary
telephone system hardware components.
BOARDS/COIIMISSIONS RBCOIIMBNDATION: Not applicable
DISCUSSION:
The South Chula Vista Library is scheduled to open early in 1995 with staff
anticipated to occupy the facility by December 12, 1994. At that time all of the
telephone equipment must be installed and ready for use. This contract is for
the purchase, installation, and implementation of the necessary telephones and
related equipment to support the needs of the South Chula Vista Library. All of
this equipment will be warranted for a period of twelve months.
The proposed vendor will be adding to the NEC NEAX 2400 Telephone Switch (P8X)
a Port Interface Module (PIM). This is necessary to accommodate present and
future electronic components required to facilitate the phone system growth due
to the opening of the South Chula Vista Library and future growth needs of the
city. In conjunction with the PIM installation, a RL30F50 F10trol unit will be
added to the power rectifier supplying the PBX in order to provide the required
additional power. Also installed at South Chula Vista will be thirty-three (33)
six-button and two (2) sixteen-button NEC Series II Display telephones. In order
to provide telephone voice input into the Library's overhead paging system a nine
zone paging unit will also be installed and connected to the switch.
On August 6, 1994, staff sent requests for proposals to three local companies who
were authorized distributors of N.E.C. telephone equipment and advertised the
existence of the RFP in the local newspapers. The three companies that responded
were:
COM-AID
NEC
ATEL
Pr01lOsal
$ 31,893.29
$ 36,538.32
$ 46,114.60
Location
El Cajon
San Diego
San Diego
7"}
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 11/01/94
The city Manager appointed a selection committee of the following individuals to
evaluate the proposals:
Louie Vignapiano
David Palmer
Rick Nelson
Director of Management & Information Services
Library Director
Computer Operations Manager
The proposals were evaluated based on ability to perform the necessary work,
references and price. COM-AID offered the best price and their references clearly
demonstrate their ability to satisfactorily perform the necessary work.
The proposed contract costs are for the purchase of hardware to expand the
capacity of the existing NEC NEAX 2400 telephone switch to accommodate the
immediate needs of the Library and to provide telephone instruments and service
to the South Chula Vista Library.
The City of Chula Vista has not contracted with COM-AID for any other services
in the past.
l'isca1 IlIIDllct
Money has been appropriated in the capital improvement project LB125 (South Chula
Vista Library) and GG128 (Telephone System Upgrades) in FY 1994-95. $ 23,079.68
will be spent from LB125 and $ 8,813.61 will be spent from GG128. A total of
$44,000 was budgeted for this equipment therefore the cost of $31,893.29 is
within the budgeted amount.
7")..
RESOLUTION NO. /'l?~P
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH COM-AID
INC. FOR THE PURCHASE, INSTALLATION, AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF VARIOUS TELEPHONE SYSTEM
HARDWARE COMPONENTS
WHEREAS, the approved FY 1994-95 CIP includes a project
for telephone system upgrades at the South Chula Vista Library,
which will require thirty-five telephones to be located at the four
public service desks and at various offices throughout the facility
which need to be connected to the City's telephone switch located
at City Hall; and
WHEREAS, in order to support these additional telephones,
several pieces of hardware need to be added to the City's telephone
switch and thirty-five telephones must be purchased and installed
at the South Chula Vista Library; and
WHEREAS, staff sent out requests for proposals and the
following three companies responded:
COM-AID
NEC
ATEL
$31,893.29
$36,538.32
$46,114.60
WHEREAS, the proposals were evaluated based on ability to
perform the necessary work, references and price and COM-AID
offered the best price and their references clearly demonstrate
their ability to satisfactorily perform the necessary work.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve an Agreement with COM-AID
Inc. for the purchase, installation, and implementation of various
Telephone System Hardware Components, a copy of which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be
completed by the Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Louie Vignapiano, Director
of Management & Information
Services
C:\rs\ComAid
?~:J /7-1
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
COM-AID, Inc.
for Purchase, Installation and Implementation
Of Various Telephone System Hardware Components
This agreement ("Agreement"), dated November I, 1994 for the
purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last
executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on
Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is
set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on
the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Vendor, whose business
form is set forth ort Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of
business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A,
paragraph 6 ("Vendor"), and is made with reference to the
following facts:
Recitals
Whereas, the City desires to have supplied and installed a
variety of Telephone System Hardware Components; and,
Whereas, the City prepared a request for proposal for such
services; and,
Whereas, the Purchasing Department did advertise in local
newspapers the availability of the request for proposal; and,
Whereas, the selection committee evaluated proposals from
three different vendors and chose the vendor which best meets the
needs of the City; and,
Whereas, Vendor warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can
prepare and deliver the services required of Vendor to City
within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement;
7..f
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Vendor do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
I. Vendor's Duties
A. General Duties
Vendor shall perform all of the services described on the
attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and,
B. Scope of Work and Schedule
In the process of performing and delivering said "General
Duties", Vendor shall also perform all of the services described
in Exhibit A, paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and
Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according
to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph
8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in
Exhibit A, paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein,
time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties
and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and
Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services".
Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated
does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate
this Agreement.
C. Reductions in Scope of Work
City may independently, or upon request from Vendor, from
time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the
Vendor under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Vendor
agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of
negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation
associated with said reduction.
D. Additional Services
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set
forth, City may require Vendor to perform additional consulting
services related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"),
and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of
services offered by Vendor, Vendor shall perform same on a time
and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule"
in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is
otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services
shall be paid monthly as billed.
E. Standard of Care
Vendor, in performing any Services under this agreement,
whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in
a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under
?~
similar conditions and in similar locations.
F. Insurance
Vendor represents that it and its agents, staff and
subvendors employed by it in connection with the Services
required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss
by the following insurance coverage, in the following categories,
and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by
Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or
better, or shall meet with the approval of the City:
Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's
Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the
attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9.
Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business
Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit
A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each
project away from premises owned or rented by Vendor, which names
City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary
to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary
Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and
Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public
("Cross-liability Coverage").
Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is
included in the General Liability policy.
G. Proof of Insurance Coverage.
1. Certificates of Insurance.
Vendor shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein
required, prior to the commencement of services required under
this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance
demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may
not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice
to the Additional Insured.
2. Policy Endorsements Required.
In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured
Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required
under Vendor's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy,
Vendor shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City
demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the
Risk Manager.
H. Performance Bond.
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 9, indicates the
?-?
need for Vendor to provide a Performance Bond, which indication
shall be made by checking the parenthetical space adjacent to the
term, "Performance Bond", then Vendor shall provide to the City a
performance bond by a surety and in a form satisfactory to the
City Attorney in an amount indicated in the space adjacent to the
term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 9, Exhibit A.
II. Duties of the City
A. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Vendor for the purpose of
reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule
therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to
achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit
access to its office facilities, files and records by Vendor
throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City
agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set
forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further
understanding that delay in the provision of these materials
beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a
basis for the justifiable delay in the Vendor's performance of
this agreement.
B. Compensation
Upon receipt of a properly prepared biliing from Vendor,
City shall compensate Vendor for all services rendered by Vendor
according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 11 adjacent to the governing compensation relationship
indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement,
and shall compensate Vendor for out of pocket expenses as
provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12.
All billings submitted by Vendor shall contain sufficient
information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City
to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper,
and shall specifically contain the City's account number
indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon
making such payment.
III. Administration of Contract
Each party designates the individuals ("Contract
Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said
party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to
represent them in the routine administration of this agreement.
IV. Term.
This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have
complied with all executory provisions hereof.
?..r(
V. Liquidated Damages
The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages
Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14.
It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the
essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to
estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per-
formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a
reasonable amount to compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted
time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the
following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess
of the time specified for the completion of the respective work
assignment or Deliverable, the vendor shall pay to the City, or
have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate
provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate").
Time extensions for delays beyond the vendor's control,
other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in
writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior
to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time,
when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work
and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work
unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the
progress of the work.
VI. Financial Interests of Vendor
A. Vendor is Designated as an FPPC Filer.
If Vendor is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an
"FPPC filer", Vendor is deemed to be a "Vendor" for the purposes
of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure
provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk
on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting
categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if
none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney.
B. Decline to Participate.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor shall not make, or participate in making or in any way
attempt to use Vendor's position to influence a governmental
decision in which Vendor knows or has reason to know Vendor has a
financial interest other than the compensation promised by this
Agreement.
C. Search to Determine Economic Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor warrants and represents that Vendor has diligently
conducted a search and inventory of Vendor's economic interests,
7-'
0t
r
as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair
political Practices Commission, and has determined that Vendor
does not, to the best of Vendor's knowledge, have an economic
interest which would conflict with Vendor's duties under this
agreement.
D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor further warrants and represents that Vendor will not
acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term
of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest
as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act.
E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor further warrants and represents that Vendor will
immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Vendor learns of
an economic interest of Vendor's which may result in a conflict
of interest for the purpose of the Fair political Practices Act,
and regulations promulgated thereunder.
F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests.
Vendor warrants and represents that neither Vendor, nor
Vendor's immediate family members, nor Vendor's employees or
agents ("Vendor Associates") presently have any interest,
directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be
the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property
within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any
property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services,
("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A,
paragraph 15.
Vendor further warrants and represents that no promise of
future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other
reward or gain has been made to Vendor or Vendor Associates in
connection with Vendor's performance of this Agreement. Vendor
promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made
during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Vendor agrees that Vendor Associates shall not acquire any
such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or
for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with
the written permission of City.
VII. Hold Harmless
Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and
against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense
(including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the
conduct of the Vendor, or any agent or employee, subcontractors,
7;JtJ
J.l
or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by
this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the
sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its
officers, or employees. Vendor's indemnification shall include
any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability
incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in
defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to
judgment or not. Further, Vendor at its own expense shall, upon
written request by the City, defend any such suit or action
brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees.
Vendors' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any
prior or subsequent declaration by the Vendor.
VIII. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Vendor shall fail to fulfill in a
timely and proper manner Vendor's obligations under this
Agreement, or if Vendor shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to
Vendor of such termination and specifying the effective date
thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such
termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents,
data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other
materials prepared by Vendor snaIl, at the option of the City,
become the property of the City, and Vendor shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work
satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up
to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the
amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by
Vendor's breach.
IX. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the City Administrator determines that the
Vendors' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of
work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater
than would have resulted if there were no such negligence,
errors, omissions, Vendor shall reimburse City for any additional
expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to
limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement.
X. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason, by giving specific written notice to Vendor of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least
thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination.
In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other
materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City,
become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is
terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Vendor shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials
7..1/
to the effective date of such termination. Vendor hereby
expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation
arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein.
XI. Assignability
The services of Vendor are personal to the City, and Vendor
shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not
transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or
novation), without prior written consent of City, which City may
not unreasonably deny.
XII. Ownership and Use of Equipment and Materials
All equipment, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans,
procedures, software, documentation, systems and any other
materials or properties covered under this Agreement shall be the
sole and exclusive property of City. City shall have unrestricted
authority to sell or otherwise dispose of all said items.
XIII. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Vendor
shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of
the manner and means of performing the services required under
this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or
accept Vendor's work products. Vendor and any of the Vendor's
agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under
this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed
to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to
any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but
not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's
compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits.
XIV.
Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this
agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been
presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by
the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter
1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to
time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this
reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and
procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Vendor shall meet and confer in good
faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the
terms of this Agreement.
XV. Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in
litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense
7" /.2.
of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees.
XVI. Statement of Costs
In the event that Vendor prepares a report or document, or
participates in the preparation of a report or document in
performing the Defined Services, Vendor shall include, or cause
the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the
numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and
subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or
document.
XVII. Miscellaneous
A. Vendor not authorized to Represent City
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Vendor
shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to
any contractual agreements whatsoever.
B. Vendor is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Vendor
and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of
California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker
or salesperson. Otherwise, Vendor represents that neither
Vendor, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or
salespersons.
C. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted
to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All
notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be
deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served
or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party,
postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt
requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of
business for each of the designated parties.
D. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with any other written document
referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement
and understanding between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof
may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an
instrument in writing executed by the party against which
enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
E. Capacity of Parties
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and
represents to the other party that it has legal authority and
7'/j
capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this
Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been
taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
F. Governing Law/Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action
arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only
in the federal or state courts located in San Diego county, State
of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as
close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and
performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
[end of page. next page is signature page.]
7./'/
Signature Page
to
Agreement between City of Chula Vista and COM-AID, Inc.
for Purchase, Installation and Implementation Of Various
Telephone System Hrdware Components
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Vendor have executed this
Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood
same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
Dated:
, 1994
City of Chula Vista
by:
Tim Nader, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Oty A~C-tal.\-~ ~
,
Dated:
COM-AID, Inc.
By: Da~\td+<
General Manager
Exhibit List to Agreement
(Xl Exhibit A.
( l Exhibit B:
?.. Jf
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
COM-AID, Inc.
I. Effective Date of Agreement:
II. City-Related Entity:
(X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation
of the State of California
) Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, a
political subdivision of the State of California
( ) Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula
Vista, a
) Other:
[insert business form]
, a
("City" )
III. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista,
276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 91910
IV. Vendor: COM-AID, Inc.
V. Business Form of Vendor:
( ) Sole Proprietorship
( ) Partnership
(X) Corporation
VI. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Vendor:
380 Vernon Way
Suite A
El Cajon, California 92020
Voice Phone (619) 441-0707
Fax Phone (619) 441-0987
VII. General Duties:
Supply, install and implement various Telephone System
hardware components.
7, II,
VIII. Scope of Work and Schedule:
A. Detailed Scope of Work:
Lorain Power SUDDlv Modifications
At this time, power to the NEC NEAX 2400 comes via a Lorain
power rectifier with two RL30F50 Flotrol units wired in
parallel. This insures a minimum of 30 amperes of power if
either RL30F50 unit fails. There is no room in the current
rack for additional RL30F50 units and no space immediately
adjacent to it to install an additional rack.
Vendor is to supply and install another 7' x 23" rack with
Flotrol RL30F50 rectifier approximately six feet North of
the existing Lorain rack oriented in a similar manner. The
output power and status leads from the new Flotrol RL30F50
rectifier unit installed in the new rack are to be
interfaced with the existing Lorain unit such that should
one of the three RL30F50 units fail, a minimum of 60 amperes
of power will be available to the phone switch.
Since the existing Lorain must be powered down to permit the
new unit to be safely interconnected and since the NEC NEAX
2400 must be powered down preventing all non 911 Police and
Fire calls, this work must be conducted between 3:00 a.m.
and 7:00 a.m. on a Saturday or Sunday morning. For this
reason, if prudent, it is requested that the PIM
installation specified later in this document be
accomplished at the same time.
The NEC NEAX database is to be backed up prior to this
procedure to insure a full and current restart of the PBX
switch upon power up.
The warrantee period on the Lorain power rectifier upgrade
for all parts and labor regarding the newly installed
equipment is for a period of 12 months.
The warrantee does not cover already existing rectifier
hardware.
The guaranteed response times while the
system is under warrantee is 2 hours for
emergency calls and 24 hours on non emergency
calls.
The following are the stated Minimum and Maximum operating
temperatures without harmful effects on related hardware:
Continuous operation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
72 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
48 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
?~7
. I
24 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
16 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
8 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
The m~n~mum and maximum humidity requirements are stated as:
15 % to 90% non condensing.
The maximum temperature change within any time span that the
system can handle without harm to hardware is stated as 32
to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
There are no stated unusual environmental and/or power
requirements that this hardware will require to run
optimally.
The minimum number of years that the vendor guarantees to
provide normal industry standard maintenance support for
this equipment is seven (7).
The parts list includes at least but is not limited to:
(1) System rectifier, RL30F50, FLOTROL
(1) Seven foot by 23 inch Rack
(1) Lot rectifier power cable and misc. materials
(1) Lot labor to install, connect and test (includes
performance bond)
Installation of P.I.H.
The current NEC NEAX 2400 is I.M.S. M.D.S. with four PIMs in
the first module (LPO) and one in the second module (LP1).
Vendor is to supply and install a second PIM in the second
module (LP1). The new PIM is to be fully wired out to the
backboard.
Since the NEC NEAX 2400 must be powered down preventing all
non 911 Police and Fire calls, this work must be conducted
between 3:00 a.m. and 7:00 a.m. on a Saturday or Sunday
morning. For this reason, if prudent, it is requested that
the PIM installation and the Lorain power supply
modifications be accomplished at the same time.
The NEC NEAX database should be backed up prior to this
procedure to insure a full and current restart of the PBX
switch upon power up.
The warrantee on the newly installed P.I.M. equipment is for
a period of 12 months and covers all parts and labor.
The warrantee does not cover already existing N.E.C.
NEAX 2400 hardware.
The guaranteed response times while the
system is under warrantee is 2 hours for
~r
emergency calls and 24 hours on non emergency
calls.
The following are the stated Minimum and Maximum operating
temperatures without harmful effects on related hardware:
Continuous operation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
72 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
48 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
24 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
16 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
8 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
The minimum and maximum humidity requirements are stated as:
15 % to 90% non condensing.
The maximum temperature change within any time span that the
system can handle without harm to hardware is stated as 32
to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
There are no stated unusual environmental and/or power
requirements that this hardware will require to run
optimally.
The minimum number of years that the vendor guarantees to
provide normal industry standard maintenance support for
this equipment is seven (7).
The parts list includes at least but is not limited to:
(1) PIMB-SA with power supplies and cables
(1) IMG/PIM cable Unit A-B
(8) PIM/MDF switch cables
(4) 66M150 termination blocks
(1) Lot cable fasteners and misc. materials
(1) Lot labor to install, connect and test (includes
performance bond)
Installation of Two Diaital Remote Units (DRUs)
Vendor is to supply and install all hardware and provide any
required NEC NEAX 2400 programming necessary for two NEC
Digital Remote Units (DRUs) at the South Chula Vista Library
(SCVL) site and two DIAC cards at the NEC NEAX 2400 switch
site. Vendor will use two (City installed) Pacific Bell T-1
lines between the NEC NEAX 2400 and the South Chula Vista
Library. The DRUs will provide total of 46 digital
communication paths for phone conversation.
The 46 phone lines are to be fully wired to the back board
at each location for future cross connect purposes.
Vendor is to supply and install an Uninterruptable Power
7;)9
~
Supply (UPS) capable of sustaining, without interruption to
service, the two DRU units at the South Chula Vista Library,
under full load, for a minimum period of four (4) hours in
the event of an S.D.G.& E. power failure.
The warrantee on the newly installed DRU and associated
equipment is for a period of 12 months and covers all parts
and labor.
The warrantee does not cover already existing N.E.C.
NEAX 2400 hardware.
The guaranteed response times while the
system is under warrantee is 2 hours for
emergency calls and 24 hours on non emergency
calls.
The following are the stated Minimum and Maximum operating
temperatures without harmful effects on related hardware:
Continuous operation 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
72 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
48 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
24 continuous hours 41 to 86 degrees fahrenheit.
16 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
8 continuous hours 32 to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
The minimum and maximum humidity requirements are stated as:
15 % to 90% non condensing.
The maximum temperature change within any time span that the
system can handle without harm to hardware is stated as 32
to 104 degrees fahrenheit.
There are no stated unusual environmental and/or power
requirements that this hardware will require to run
optimally.
The minimum number of years that the vendor guarantees to
provide normal industry standard maintenance support for
this equipment is seven (7).
The parts list includes at least but is not limited to:
(2) 24-DLI-DAIC cards
(2) DRU-23-S2 , digital remote units
(1) DRU manual
(4) Kentrox T-Serve CSUs with cables
(1) 4-hour UPS (Best)
(1) Lot miscellaneous installation materials
(1) Lot labor to install, connect and test
7'.ltJ
Installation Of NEC Series II Displav Telephones
Vendor is to supply and install thirty-three (33) six-button
and two (2) sixteen-button NEC Series II Displav telephones.
These telephones will be connected to jacks which are
already prewired back to the SCVL Main Distribution Frame
(MDF). The prewired jacks will then be cross connected to 35
of the DRU digital circuits previously installed by the
vendor.
phone numbers as designated by SCVL will be will be assigned
to each phone and programmed into the NEC NEAX 2400 by the
vendor. Vendor shall thoroughly test all phones and circuits
for proper functions and access to and through the NEC NEAX
2400 PBX.
Training is to be provided by the vendor regarding the
proper usage of the Series II telephones. The proposed
Trainina Proaram should consist of the following:
On site training must be provided for approximately 40
employees. A maximum of 25 employees can be
accommodated at a single session, however, a minimum of
three training sessions must be offered with a schedule
flexible enough to accommodate the various work
schedules and availabilities of City employees.
Proper training materials and reference guides should
be available to all participants in the training
program.
The number of employees permitted at each session is to
be approximately 15.
The approximate length of each individual training
session is 1 hour.
The warrantee on the installation of the new Series II
telephones is for a period of 12 months and covers all parts
and labor.
The warrantee does not cover already existing N.E.C.
NEAX 2400 hardware.
The guaranteed response times while the
system is under warrantee is 2 hours for
emergency calls and 24 hours on non emergency
calls.
There are no stated unusual environmental and/or power
requirements that this hardware will require to run
optimally.
?'~I
The m~n~mum number of years that the vendor guarantees to
provide normal industry standard maintenance support for
this equipment is seven (7).
The parts list includes at least but is not limited to:
(33) Series II, ETE-6D-2 , 6 button display telephones
(2) Series II, ETE-16D-1, 16 button display telephones
(3) Three hours training [(3) I-hour sessions]
(8) 25 pair MDF switch cables
(1) Lot misc. materials
(1) Lot labor to install, designate, program and test
Install And Interconnect Nine-Zone paaina Unit
Vendor will install a Nine-Zone Paging unit at the NEAX 2400
site. Using a City installed OPX line between the NEAX 2400
and SCVL the vendor will interface the signal out of the
Paging unit with a Dukane Amplifier (supplied by City) at
the SCVL site. Vendor will program the NEAX 2400 so that the
preexisting paging zone (access code *5) and the new library
zone (access code to be determined) will work off the new
Nine-Zone system.
The warrantee on the installation of the new Nine-Zone
Paging Unit is for a period of 12 months and covers all
parts and labor.
The warrantee does not cover already existing N.E.C.
NEAX 2400 hardware.
The guaranteed response times while the
system is under warrantee is 2 hours for
emergency calls and 24 hours on non emergency
calls.
There are no stated unusual environmental and/or power
requirements that this hardware will require to run
optimally.
The minimum number of years that the vendor guarantees to
provide normal industry standard maintenance support for
this equipment is seven (7).
The parts list includes at least but is not limited to:
(1) Valcom V-9940 station level paging adaptor
(1) Valcom V-9940 paging power supply
(1) 24 vole relay
(1) Valcom V-1109 9 zone paging interface unit
(1) Lot misc. material
(1) Lot labor to install, interconnect and test
B. Date for Commencement of Vendor Services:
(X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
7~~~
( ) Other:
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
D. Date for completion of all Vendor services:
December 12, 1994.
IX. Insurance Requirements:
Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance
Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000.
Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000.
Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required
(included in Commercial General Liability coverage).
Errors and Omissions Insurance: $250,000 (not included
in Commercial General Liability coverage).
Performance Bond equal to 50% of total cost (parts,
labor and taxes) of all work done.
X. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Vendor:
(X)
(X)
(X)
( )
( )
(X)
The City will have Pacific Bell install two (2) T-1 lines
and one (1) OPX line between the 276 4th Avenue site and the
South Chula Vista Library by the date(s) provided by the
vendor. Pacific Bell requires 10 working days lead time on
installation of T-1 lines and 12 working days lead time on
installation of OPX lines.
XI. Compensation:
A. (X) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Vendor as
herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts
and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set forth
below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount: $ 31,893.29 payable as follows:
Milestone or Event or Deliverable
Amount of Fixed Fee
$ 15,946.64
$ 15,946.65
At acceptance of contract.
At acceptance by City of all completed
work. Acceptance by City is contingent
upon demonstration to the satisfaction
of the City, in its reasonable
discretion, that during a reasonable
demonstration period not to exceed ten
(10) working days all NEC NEAX 2400
switch programming and installed
equipment is performing properly and
interfaces with existing equipment properly.
7'~3
Payment of $ 31,893.29 consists of $ 1,816.32 state tax which
will be paid by COM-AID, Inc. on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista.
B. () Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined
Services by Vendor as are separately identified below, City shall
pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the
amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth.
Vendor shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not
be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall
have issued a notice to proceed to Vendor as to said Phase.
Phase
Fee for Said phase
C.
( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement
For performance of the Defined Services by Vendor as herein
required, City shall pay Vendor for the productive hours of time
spent by Vendor in the performance of said Services, at the rates
or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according
to the following terms and conditions:
1. () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and
Materials Arrangement
Notwithstanding the expenditure by Vendor of time
and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation
amount, Vendor agrees that Vendor will perform all of
the Defined Services herein required of Vendor for
$ including all Materials, and other
"reimburseables" ("Maximum Compensation").
2. () Limitation without Further Authorization on
Time and Materials Arrangement
At such time as Vendor shall have incurred time
and materials equal to
("Authorization Limit"), Vendor shall not be entitled
to any additional compensation without further
authorization issued in writing and approved by the
City. Nothing herein shall preclude Vendor from
providing additional Services at Vendor's own cost and
expense.
Rate Schedule
Category of Employee
of Vendor
Hourly
Name
Rate
7 '.l~
( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services
rendered after [month], 19 , if delay in
providing services is caused by City.
XII. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Vendor in
the performance of services herein required, City shall pay
Vendor at the rates or amounts set forth below:
(X) None, the compensation includes all costs.
( ) Reports, not to exceed $
( ) Copies, not to exceed $
( ) Travel, not to exceed $
( ) Printing, not to exceed $
( ) Postage, not to exceed $
( ) Delivery, not to exceed $
( ) Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $
( ) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs:
Cost or Rate
XIII. Contract Administrators:
City:
Richard L. Nelson, Computer Operations Manager,
276 4th Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dale Hardy, General Manager, 380 Vernon Way, Suite
A, EI Cajon, CA 92020
XIV. Liquidated Damages Rate: $ 200.00 per day.
Vendor:
XV. Statement of Economic Interests, Vendor Reporting
Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code:
(X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
( ) FPPC Filer
( ) Category No.1. Investments and sources of
income.
( )
( )
( )
Category No.2. Interests in real property.
Category No.
property and
regulatory,
department.
3. Investments, interest in real
sources of income subject to the
permit or licensing authority of the
Category No.4. Investments in business entities
and sources of income which engage in land
~~
development, construction or the acquisition or
sale of real property.
( ) Category No.5. Investments in business entities
and sources of income of the type which, within
the past two years, have contracted with the City
of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide
services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.6. Investments in business entities
and sources of income of the type which, within
the past two years, have contracted with the
designated employee's department to provide
services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.7. Business positions.
( ) List "Vendor Associates" interests in real property
within 2 radial miles of Project property, if any:
XVI. () Vendor is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
XVII. Permitted Subvendors:
[END OF EXHIBIT A, REMAINDER OF PAGE IS BLANK]
7"'~~
THE CITY OF CHUU VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be di~c1osed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor,
material supplier.
Com-AID, Inc. Sprint North Supply
NEC America. Inc.
Graybar Electric
2. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest
in the partnership.
WilHam Schwem - President: Com-AID..Inc.
Francis Gorman, V.P.; Com-AID, Inc.
Michael Serino, Secretary; Com-AID, Inc.
3. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the
trust.
N/A
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Dale Hardy, General Manager Jon Jensen, Controller
Th0Mas Champ, Account ~ecut1ve
William Schwem. President
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Council member in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No l If yes, stale which
Councilmember(s):
N/A
fm2n is defined as: "Any individual. firm_ co-partnership, joint venture, assodation, sodal club, fratenlal organization,
corporation, estate, tru..t, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, dtyand country, dty, munidpality, district or other political
subdivision, or allY other group or combination acti1lg as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
Date: OemP>G/l.,;]~ ) )~'l4
[A-113\A:DISCLOSE.TXT)
Dale M. Hardy
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
?, '" ? (Reviled: 11130190]
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 8'"
Meeting Date 11/1194
J?71J1
ITEM: Resolution authorizing temporary street closures on Saturday, December
10, or Saturday December 17 (rain date), 1994, for the Chula Vista Downtown
Business Association to conduct the annual Starlight Yule Parade, and waiving
of fees for City-provided services and supplies.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks & Recr~*
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ ~ \ (4/5ths Vote:_No,X)
The Chula Vista Downtown Business AssociatIOn is requesting permission to conduct the annual Starlight
Yule Parade along Third Avenue on Saturday, December 10 or, in case of rain, on Saturday December
17, 1994, and is requesting various City-provided services and supplies.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution, subject to staff conditions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
Not applicable
DISCUSSION: The Chula Vista Downtown Business Association (DBA) is requesting permission to
conduct thl; 32nd annual Starlight Yule Parade on Saturday, December 10, 1994. A rain date is being
requested for Saturday, December 17, 1994 The DBA is also requesting City support services and
equipment. The DBA is requesting Saturday evening(s) to accommodate the participation of a maximum
number of High School and Middle School bands from the Sweetwater District; the District has
conunitted marching bands from each of the high schools in the district, as well as several bands from
the middle schools.
The parade route will be along Third Avenue, between "H" Street and "E" Street. A diagram of the area
is attached (Attachment A). This is the same parade route that has been used for a number of years.
Third Avenue will be closed between "1" Street and "D" Street, to allow for the staging and subsequent
dispersal of participating units. "H" Street and "E" Street will be closed between Second and Fourth
Avenue, and all other east-west streets that intersect Third Avenue between "1" Street and "D" Street will
be closed at the nearest point of detour to Third Avenue. Second and Fourth Avenue will remain open
to traffic at all times during the event. Chula Vista and San Diego Transit busses will run on alternate
detour routes during the closures.
Staff sent notices to all businesses and residences affected by the street closure indicating the date and
time of Council's consideration of approval for the event.
The parade is scheduled to begin at 5:00 PM. Staging for the parade will begin at approximately 2:30
PM, and will take place in the County Regional Center parking lots, and on Third Avenue between "1"
Street and "H" Street. The DBA is anticipating approximately 100 participating units in the parade, which
will include marching bands, miscellaneous marching units, floats, and other vehicles.
YULEAI13.94
1
i"/
Item l'
Meeting Date 11/1194
The DBA is asking the City to provide a number of services to support the event, and is requesting a fee
waiver for these services. The City has provided similar service in the past on a fee free basis. Specific
services requested:
Police services for crowd and traffic control from 3:00 PM to approximately 9:00 PM. (Police
Department cost estimate - $ 3,100.00 - Reserve and OT pay).
Use of the City's portable stage, PA system, folding chairs, and delivery, set-up, and removal
of this equipment (Parks and Recreation Department cost estimate - $ 270.00 - OT pay).
Parks Division personnel to clean-up trash along the parade route. (Parks and Recreation
Department cost estimate - $ 190.00 - OT pay).
Provision of street sweeping services immediately following the event. (Public Works cost
estimate for contractual street sweeping - $ 240.00)
Provision, delivery, and removal of barricades, traffic cones, and other required traffic control
equipment. (Public Works cost estimate - $ 920.00 - equipment rental and OT pay).
The total cost estimate for City services is $4,720. These cost estimates do not include full cost recovery
factors.
The DBA is also requesting:
Permission to close Third Avenue between "I" Street and "D" Street, and to close all east-west
streets intersecting Third Avenue between "I" and "D". "H" and "E" Streets will be closed
between Second and Fourth to allow for parade staging and dispersal. Street closures would take
place on some streets at approximately 2:30 PM, with all streets closed by 4'45 PM. Streets will
re-open as soon as possible following clean-up after the event.
Permission to post "No Parking" signs on Third Avenue along the parade route. The parking
prohibition will be in effect from 3:00 - 9:00 PM.
The event is exempt from CEQA requirements with a Class 23 exemption.
Approval should be subject to the DBA meeting the following conditions:
1 Provision of evidence of general liability insurance in the amount of $1 million, in the form of
a certificate of insurance and policy endorsement which names the City as additional insured.
2. Execution of a standard Hold Harmless Agreement.
3 Distribution of written notification to all residences and businesses along the parade route and
along other streets that will be closed to traffic, of the date(s) and duration of the event.
YULEA113.94
2
r..~
Item g"
Meeting Date 11/1/94
4 Provision of an adequate number of portable toilets along the parade route,
5, Provision and posting of "No Parking" signs along the parade route. Posting must take place a
minimum of twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the effective time.
The Police Department, Risk Manager and Public Works Department concur with the conditions outlined
above.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $4,270 of non-budgeted over-time expenditures will be absorbed
by several City departments, which could result in negative balances in overtime accounts at the end of
the fiscal year An additional $450 will need to be absorbed by the Public Works department to offset
the costs of traffic control equipment rental and street sweeping services. Additional expenses would be
incurred by the City if the parade is canceled due to rain and re-scheduled the following week, since
rental equipment and City equipment must be handled several days in advance of the event.
YULEA1l3.94
3
8":J / g-tf-
1'0
RESOLUTION NO.
J771)/
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET
CLOSURES ON SATURDAY, DECEMBER 10, 1994 OR
SATURDAY, DECEMBER 17, 1994, (RAIN DATE) FOR
THE CHULA VISTA DOWNTOWN BUSINESS ASSOCIATION
TO CONDUCT THE 32ND ANNUAL STARLIGHT YULE
PARADE, AND WAIVING OF FEES FOR CITY-PROVIDED
SERVICES AND SUPPLIES
WHEREAS, the Chula vista Downtown Business Association is
requesting permission to conduct the annual Starlight Yule Parade
on Third Avenue on Saturday, December 10 or, in case of rain on
that date; Saturday December 17, 1994, and is requesting various
City-provided services and supplies; and
WHEREAS, the parade route will be along Third Avenue,
between "H" Street and "E" Street; and
WHEREAS, the event is exempt from CEQA requirements with
a Class 23 exemption.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize temporary street
closures on either Saturday, December 10, 1994 at the request of
the Downtown Business Association determined sufficiently in
advance to permit the City to arrange for extra Police protection
and Public Works crews or, in the event of rain, then on Saturday,
December 17, 1994 for the Chula vista Downtown Business Association
to conduct the annual Starlight Yule Parade subject to the Downtown
Business Association meeting the following conditions:
1. provision of evidence of general liability
insurance in the amount of $1 million, in the form
of a certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement which names the City as additional
insured.
2. Execution of a standard Hold Harmless Agreement.
3. Distribution of written notification to all
residences and businesses along the parade route
and along other streets that will be closed to
traffic, of the date{s) and duration of the event.
4. provision of an adequate number of portable toilets
along the parade route.
5. provision and posting of "No Parking" signs along
the parade route. Posting must take place a
~"f
1-1 t
minimum of twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the
effective time.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
waive the fees for City-provided services and sup ies.
Presented by
orm by
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
Bruce M.
Attorney
C:\rs\starlite
y,,,
-.
,
Item
Meeting Date 11/1/94
9
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Resolution J 7 7d,J.. Accepting bids and awarding
contract for purchase of turf tractors and mowing equipment.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public works~ ~
Director of Finance ~ . I
Director of Parks ~reati~~J1
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ ql (4/5THS vote: Yes___No-K-)
Bids were received and opened at 2:00 pm on September 19, 1994, in the office
of the Purchasing Agent for the following equipment for Parks & Recreation:
ITEM TITLE:
Jgm
QU
Description
1
1
Turf tractor w/front mounted mower
2
1
Turf mower, 4 wheel drive
3
1
Turf mower, 2 wheel drive
RECOMMENDATION: That Council award the bid for Item 1 to Pauley Ford,
Item 2 to Bob Hicks Turf, and Item 3 to Western Turf.
BOARDS & COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The bid packages were mailed to seven (7) vendors including four vendors in
San Diego County with five (5) responding on some of the items. The
following is a summary of bids received, and lists only those bidders who
responded on a particular item:
Item 1 - Turf tractor w/front mounted mower
Bidder Unit 7% Sales Tax
~ Included
Pauley Equipment $20,850 $1,459.50
Escondida, CA
Clairemont Equipment $19,747 $1,382.29
San Diego, CA
Western Turf $23,030 $1,612.10
Corona
Trade-in
Allowance
Net
Amount
$5,500
$16,809.50
$3,220
$17,909.29
$2,500
$22,142 10
The net low bid of Pauley Ford meets specifications and is acceptable.
The following turf tractor will be traded in upon purchase: 1986 Ford turf
tractor, property tag #15140.
9-/
Page 2, Item-i..-
Meeting Date 11/1194
Item #2 - Turf mover. 4 wheel drive
$17,540
7% Sales Tax
Included
$1,227.80
Trade-in
Allowance
Net Amount
Bidder
Unit Price
Bob Hicks, Turf
San Diego, CA
California Turf
San Diego, CA
$1,000
$17,767.80
$18,613
$1,302.91
$500
$19,415.00
The net low bid of Bob Hicks Turf meets specifications and is acceptable. A
1982 Toro Grandmaster, Property Tag #13670, will be traded-in upon purchase
of the new vehicle.
Item #3 - Turf Mower. 2 wheel drive
Bidder Unit Price 7% Sales Tax Trade-in Net Amount
Included Allowance
Western Turf $14,275 $999 25 N/A $15,274.25
Corona, CA
California Turf $14,894 $1,042.58 N/A $15,936.58
San Diego, CA
The net low bid of Western Turf does not meet all of the bid specifications.
The specifications state an adjustable steering wheel is required. Western
Turf's (the apparent low bidder) Jacobson Model 1672-D Mower has a handle bar
with a cable operated type of steering which is stiffer to steer. California
Turf's Model 216-D Mower has adjustable steering wheel and solid linkage with
pinion sector gear type steering, which meets specifications. This is an
important requirement because it quickens response time for effortless
steering, which makes it more responsive for the operator to maneuver around
trees, picnic tables and other objects. Therefore, staff recommends the bid
be awarded to California Turf.
The cost for the Western Turf mower is $15,274.25 and the California Turf
mower is $15,936.58. The difference is $662.33. This is a new equipment
purchase with no trade-in.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds are provided for in the FY 94/95 equipment
replacement budget for purchase of the two turf tractors with front mounted
mowers. The total amount of the two mowers including 7% sales tax and trade-
in allowance is $34,577.30. The total amount budgeted for the purchase is
$45,471 resulting in a savings of $10,893.70. The existing mowers have a
combined annual maintenance cost of $6,850 and operating cost of $719. We
estimate the on-going maintenance cost will drop while operating cost will
remain about the same. The savings will be reflected in the equipment
maintenance charges account 100-1520-5269. During the 1994-95 budget
process, Council appropriated $18,000 in Parks and Recreation budget for
purchase of a new turf tractor. The total cost of the turf tractor is
$15,936.58. The general fund amount saved from this purchase is $2,034.42.
The on-going annual maintenance and operating cost budgeted in account 100-
1522-5269 is $1,300.
.
9-~
"
,
RESOLUTION NO.
J77/).l
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF TURF TRACTORS AND
MOWING EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the following three bids were received and opened at
2:00 p.m. on September 19, 1994 in the Office of the Purchasing
Agent for the following equipment for Parks and Recreation:
Item ~ Description
1 1 Turf tractor w/front mounted mower
2 1 Turf mower, 4 wheel drive
3 1 Turf mower, 2 wheel drive
Item 1 Turf tractor w/front mounted mower
7% Sales Trade-in Not
~ Unit Price Tax Included Allowance ~
Pauley Equipment $20,850 $1,459.50 $5,500.00 $16,809.50
Escondida, Ca.
Clairemont Equipment $19,747 $1,382.29 $3,220.00 $17,909.29
San Diego, Ca.
Western Turf $23,030 $1,612.10 $2,500.00 $22,142.10
Corona
WHEREAS, the low bid of Pauley Equipment meets specifications
and is acceptable; and
Item 2 - Turf mower. 4 wheel drive
7% Sales Trade-in Not
~ Unit Price Tax Included Allowance Amount
Bob Hicks Turf $17,540 $1,227.80 $1,000.00 $17,767.80
San Diego, Ca.
California Turf $18,613 $1,302.91 $ 500.00 $19,415.00
San Diego, Ca.
WHEREAS, the bid of Bob Hicks Turf meets specifications and is
acceptable; and
1
9'':>
Item 3 - 'turf mower. 2 wheel drive
7% Sale. Trade-in Ne.
~ Unit Price Tax Included Allowance Amm!m
Western Turf $14,275 $ 999.25 N/A $15,274.25
Corona, Ca.
California Turf $14,894 $1,042.58 N/A $15,936.58
San Diego, Ca.
WHEREAS, the net low bid of Western Turf does not meet all of
the bid specifications in that the specifications state an
adjustable steering wheel is required and is, therefore, deemed to
be a non-responsive bid; and
WHEREAS, California Turf's Model 216-0 has adjustable steering
wheel and solid linkage with a pinion sector gear type steering,
which meets specifications.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby accept said three bids and does
hereby award the contract for Item 1 to Pauley Ford, for Item 2 to
Bob Hicks Turf and Item 3 to Western Turf.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula
vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contracts
for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Robert Powell, Director
of Finance
APprz a~~ol;,~i!
Bruce M. BOOgaar~, City
Attorney
Presented by
C;\rs\tractor
2
9.~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
Item IP
Meeting Date 11/1194
Resolution J 7 'JP.3 Accepting bids and awarding contract for
purchase of Cab & Chassis .~~thrp body
Director of Public Works (WV
Director of FinancelY'1\~
City Manager~ ~~ 1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
Bids were received and opened at 3'00 pm on October 10, 1994, in the office of the Purchasing
Agent for a Cab & Chassis with dump body for Public Works Operations.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council award the bid to the lowest responsible bidder, Dion
International Trucks, Inc. who met all required specifications.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The bid packages were mailed to ten (10) vendors including six (6) vendors in San Diego
County with three (3) responding and one of the three providing an unsolicited alternative bid.
The following is a summary of bids received:
Cab & ChMsis with 10/12 Cubic Yard DumD Bodv
Bidder Unit 7% Sales Trade-in Net
Price Tax Allowance Amount
Included
Dion International $79,747 $5,582.33 $7,500 $77,829.93
San Diego, CA
Pressley Peterbuilt $80,959 $5,667 13 $5,000 $81,626.13
San Diego, CA
Pacific Freightlines $82,600 $5,782.00 $2,500 $85,882.00
Lakeside, CA
Alternative Bid $74,500 $5,215.00 $2,500 $77,215.00
(Manual Transmission
not automatic)
The net low bid of Dion International meets specifications and is acceptable. The following
dump truck will be traded in upon purchase: 1988 Chevrolet, 1 ton dump truck, property tag
# 16260 The alternative bid of Pacific Freightlines does not meet specifications and is
/I)~ J
Page 2, Item I/)
Meeting Date 11/1/94
unacceptable. Specifically the alternative bid provides for a manual transmission rather than
an automatic transmission. Most of the City's vehicles have multiple drivers, therefore, we
specify automatic transmissions whenever possible. This precludes repairs to the manual
transmission system. Furthermore, the other bidders submitted products in full compliance
with the specifications. If we are willing to accept manual transmission (which staff strongly
recommends against) the bidding process should be reopened to allow the other bidders to
specify manual transmission.
ALTERNATIVE FUEL:
Due to its size, weight, and continuous all day operation, this vehicle is not appropriate for
consideration of conversion to alternative fuel.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Sufficient funds are provided in the FY 94-95 equipment replacement budget for purchase of
the dump truck. The total amount of the dump truck including the 7% sales tax and the trade-
in allowance is $77,829.93 The total amount budgeted for the purchases if $77,870 resulting
in a savings of $40.07
The existing dump truck has an annual maintenance of $7,699 and operating cost of $671 We
estimate the on going maintenance cost will drop significantly while the operating cost will
remain about the same. The savings will be reflected in equipment maintenance charges,
account 100-1460-5269
dcd:ab
m:\bomc\cngineer\agcnda\cabbody
"..;..
RESOLUTION NO. J'l7tJ:]
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF CAB & CHASSIS WITH
DUMP BODY
WHEREAS, the following three bids were received and
opened at 3:00 p.m. on October 10, 1994 in the office of the
purchasing Agent for a Cab & Chassis with dump body for Public
Works Operations:
Bidder
Net Amount
Dion International
San Diego, Ca.
$77,829.93
Pressley Peterbilt
San Diego, Ca.
$81,626.13
Pacific Freightlines
Lakeside, Ca.
*Alternative Bid
(Manual transmission
$85,882.00
$77,215.00
not automatic)
WHEREAS, the net low bid of Dion International meets
specifications and is acceptable.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby accept said three bids and awards
the contract to Dion International, the lowest responsible bidder,
in the amount of $77,829.93.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the purchasing Agent of the
city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute
said contract for and on behalf of the City of {hula Vista.
Presented by ApproV~d aslto~orm by ~
j~/~/' ~,
Robert Powell, Director of
Finance
Bruce M. Boog
Attorney
C:\rs\chassis.bid
/I~J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item II
Meeting Date 11/1/94
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing to consider the vacation of the portion of Moss Street from
its intersection with Naples Street westerly to Alpine Avenue, north of
Naples Street
Resolution 1..........004-
Street described above
ordering the vacation of the portion of Moss
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public
~
REVffiWED BY: City Manage
(4/5 Vote: Yes_ NoX)
Country Club Villa Estates, owner the triangular piece of property between Moss and Naples
Streets westerly of the juncture of those streets has requested that the City vacate the portion of
Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and the aforementioned intersection (see Exhibit "A"). In
accordance with the California Streets and Highways Code, the Council adopted Resolution No.
17681 at its meeting on October 4, 1994, setting the associated public hearing for November I,
1994.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council hold the subject hearing, adopt the subject resolution
ordering the vacation of the subject portion of Moss Street with the following conditions:
I. The owner/developer pay the City $100,000 for the vacated right-of-way (or, at
the Council's option, install missing curb and gutter along the north side of Moss
Street from Alpine Avenue to Third Avenue).
2. An all-way stop be installed at the intersection of Naples Street and the portion
of Alpine Avenue north of Naples Street.
3. Alpine Avenue north of Naples be widened to 52 feet curb-to-curb with
dedication of the needed right-of-way.
4. The developer/owner of the triangular parcel shall install all needed street
improvements along the parcel's Alpine Avenue and Naples Street frontages.
5. Retain an easement 20 feet wide for Sweetwater Authority.
6. Restrict access to Alpine Avenue to those locations approved by the City Engineer
and Director of Planning.
7. Completion of all discretionary approvals for the development of the parcel.
The street vacation would not become effective or recorded until all the above conditions are met
or assured.
\\- \
Page 2, Item I \
Meeting Date 11/1/94
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Resource Conservation Commission considered the Negative Declaration on
November 22, 1993. The Commission voted 5-0 to accept the Negative Declaration for
IS 94-01 (Moss Street Vacation).
2. At its meeting held September 9, 1993, the Safety Commission approved a staff report
by a vote of 6-0 recommending that the street be vacated with three conditions:
a. Widen Alpine Avenue between Moss and Naples Streets to 52 feet (curb-
to-curb)
b. Provide an all-way "STOP" at the intersection
c. Prohibit access to Alpine Avenue from applicant's property
(As shown in Exhibit "E")
3. At a public hearing held October 27, 1993, the Planning Commission found that the
proposed vacation would be consistent with the existing General Plan; however, the
Planning Commission recommended on a vote of 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Fuller
abstaining due to a conflict of interest) that the issue of the vacation be considered in
conjunction with the proposed development of the property and not separate from it.
Staff concurs with this requirement.
DISCUSSION:
Backlrround
In 1956, the City approved plans for the adjacent subdivision east of Alpine Avenue, Robinhood
No.2, showing the curb and gutter on the east side of Alpine Avenue to be installed as part of
a knuckle design, similar to what is now being proposed. However, the improvements were
never constructed. Research of our records did not indicate the reason they were not built.
In February 1988, the City Council considered a request from the San Diego Country Club for
relief from requirements for installation of improvements on Moss Street (see Council Agenda
Statement, Exhibit "8"). That requirement was generated by the request for a temporary club
house gaining access from Naples Street. It was determined that the improvements along Naples
would be constructed at such time as permanent development occurred along the Naples frontage
or by an assessment district if the south side of Naples installed street improvements by an
assessment district. The improvements along Moss Street were not made a condition at that time
and it was intended to impose them at the time that the permanent club house was built on "L"
Street. When the building permit for the permanent club house was processed it was determined
by staff that a nexus could not be made that the construction of the new club house on "L" Street
placed a burden on Moss Street and therefore a condition to build the curb and gutter on Moss
Street was not made a condition of the building permit.
11-'-
Page 3, Item-1L-
Meeting Date 11/1/94
Country Club representatives at that time did verbally agree that they saw a benefit to install
curb and gutter along Moss Street and indicated that they would commit to participate in area
improvements through Assessment District proceedings if the general area did so. That has not
happened, and this proposal will provide an opportunity to get the improvements installed on
Moss Street.
PrODosal
The developer (owner of the triangle parcel, Country Club Villa Estates) has made an offer to
the San Diego Country Club that if the City will vacate the portion of Moss Street between
Naples Street and Alpine Avenue at no cost and if the S.D. Country Club would grant the
northerly half of Moss Street to the developer at no cost, the developer will install curb, gutter
and pavement along the north side of Moss Street between Third Avenue and Alpine Avenue.
The installation of street improvements on the east side of Alpine Avenue between Moss Street
and Naples Street and pavement, curb, gutter and sidewalk on the north side of Naples Street,
between Alpine Avenue and the current intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street will be a
condition of the vacation or requirement of the development of the triangular parcel.
Parcel Information
The existing parcel containing 8323 square feet (s.f.) is designated low-medium residential (3-6
dwelling units per acre) on the City's General Plan and is zoned R-l (single family). Upon
vacation of Moss Street, another 12,259 s.f. would revert to the Country Club Villa Estates
Parcel and 18,544 s.f. to the Country Club. If the Country Club portion were combined with
the Country Club Villa Estates portion, the parcel would contain 39,126 s.f.
Currently Alpine Avenue has a street right-of-way of 60 feet. In order to meet the General Plan
designation, the right-of-way must be 72 feet in width. Consequently, street dedication for
Alpine Avenue would be required. That dedication would be approximately 1,000 s.f., leaving
a parcel containing approximately 38,000 s.f. (see Exhibit" A"). This could, theoretically, be
subdivided into five single family lots if the configuration of the parcel would support it.
Alilmment Alternatives
The alignment recommended by staff is shown on Exhibit "C" indicating that Moss Street be
curved southerly at its intersection with the present alignment of Alpine Avenue. This option
was recommended by the Safety Commission and supported by the Planning Commission with
the conditions stated herein. This option will allow the use of the existing street improvements
on Alpine Avenue lowering the cost to install the public improvements necessary to provide a
full street. It also provides the developer with the best configuration for developing the property
in a logical manner.
Another option studied was to relocate the northerly portion of Alpine Avenue to meet the
existing portion of Alpine Avenue on the south side (Exhibit "0"). This would necessitate
obtaining an easement from the applicant which would bisect the existing parcel. As was
indicated at the Safety Commission and Planning Commission hearings, the public has apparently
l1-~
Page 4, Item I I
Meeting Date 11/1/94
been using that alignment as a shortcut for a number of years. Aerial photos taken since 1960
indicate a tire-worn area created by vehicles crossing from the T -intersection, across the vacant
land and meeting Moss Street on its south side.
Desiring this realignment, public input has indicated they believed that the City had the right-of-
way for that extension by prescriptive rights. A street easement could possibly be obtained
through prescriptive rights or condemnation, but both actions would require court action and
could be quite costly. The property owner, on the other hand, indicates that although vehicles
have been cutting across the property, the area has been blocked at least one day a year since
acquiring the land, thus precluding any taking of the easement by prescriptive rights. The owner
would object in court if the City attempts to claim prescriptive rights.
In addition, should the City condemn property in order to align Alpine Avenue with the portion
south of Naples Street, the usability of the remaining portion of the land would result in a parcel
that could not be developed to the extent that all the street improvements could be required of
the developer. This would require the City to pay for the majority of the improvements as well
as remove the existing Alpine Avenue improvements. In addition, the two houses adjacent to
Alpine Avenue would have to change their address.
Staff believes that lining up the two sections of Alpine Avenue is not critical because of the low
traffic volume on the portion of Alpine Avenue south of Naples Street (260 average daily trips)
It is also staffs belief that the recommended alignment (Exhibit "C"), doing away with the
existing angled intersection is a significant improvement.
The existing curb return at the southwest corner of Moss Street and Alpine Avenue has sufficient
radius so as not to require reconstruction or additional dedication for the proposed Alpine
Avenue alignment adjacent to the existing homes.
Accident Record
According to accident records from January 1, 1990, through the end of August, 1994, there
have been four reported accidents at the intersection of Moss/Naples/First. One of these
accidents involved a single vehicle traveling west hitting the chain link fence along the Country
Club property line. This accident occurred in 1990. The other three accidents involved
eastbound vehicles entering the intersection and failing to yield the right of way to eastbound
vehicles (2) and a westbound vehicle on Naples Street.
Another reported accident occurred to the east of the intersection in question. It involved an
eastbound motorist on Naples Street turning south into the 1100 block of Alpine Avenue and
being broad-sided by a motorcyclist attempting to pass the car on the right shoulder.
Only one other mishap occurred in the area within the last three years, which involved a single
car hitting the same chain link fence just east of the 1000 block of Alpine Avenue.
The low number of accidents at the intersection can probably be attributed to the fact that, due
to the hazards presented by the acute angle of the intersection, drivers tend to be extremely
\\.-~
Page 5, Item II
Meeting Date 11/1/94
cautious when making turning movements. None of the accidents mentioned appear to be
attributable to the existing geometrics. As indicated, the majority of the accidents are a result
of drivers failing to yield the right-of-way.
Comnensation for Vacated Area
Council has, in the past, required payment for streets which have been vacated although there
is no official Council Policy relative to payment for vacated right-of-way. Each circumstance
has been considered on its own merit. In some instances payment has been for the whole area
vacated, in other cases, payment has been for the difference between the area vacated and the
area dedicated. Some streets have been vacated at no cost (Power Center in Rancho Del Rey
Business Center) because that issue was addressed in the Disposition and Development
Agreement (DDA). The County assessor's office has verbally indicated that the vacated right-
of-way parcel would be appraised at $50,000. Staff has obtained sales comparisons for other
raw land in the area for the past three years. The price per square foot of unencumbered area
has ranged from $4.00 to $9.00 per square foot. In this case, staff has used a lower price of
$5.00 for estimating the value of the vacated area. This is based on telephone input from the
assessor, the recent drop in raw land values, and difficult configuration of the parcel.
There is a water line in the existing Moss Street which the Sweetwater Authority has requested
a 20 foot easement be retained. Since the easement will prohibit the construction of any
structure within it, staff estimates that the value of the easement area to be 50 % of full value or
$2.50 per square foot. The water easement will contain approximately 11,500 square feet (s.f.).
Therefore, staff estimates that the value of the vacated land to be 11,500 s.f. multiplied by $2.50
plus 18,300 s.f. multiplied by $5.00 or $120,250.
The applicant has proposed to install off-site missing street lights, curb and gutter along the
north side of Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and Third Avenue in return for the vacated
right-of-way. The improvements are estimated by staff to cost $130,000.00. They do not
propose to install sidewalk along this frontage because they feel that it might be hazardous to
pedestrians due to errant golf balls landing in the area. Because there are no homes fronting on
that side, staff believes that use of such a walk would be extremely low and does not believe it
is needed. The estimated additional cost to install sidewalk is $60,000. The improvements to
be installed are in lieu of paying the City or the Country Club for the vacated right of way. The
developer is willing to do either of the following: 1) pay the City $100,000 for the vacated
portion of right-of-way, or; 2) install curb and gutter along the north side of Moss Street from
Alpine Avenue west to Third Avenue. The developer is only willing to give the City $100,000
because he believes that through his contracting abilities, he could build the improvements for
less than $100,000.
If the City accepts the $100,000 payment, then the Country Club would not be responsible to
install the curb and gutter on Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and Third Avenue in the
future unless they redevelop their golf course into a use that requires frontage improvements and
access onto Moss Street. If the City later wishes to have improvements on the north side of
Moss Street, it would be our responsibility to fund them.
\\- S
Page 6, Item , \
Meeting Date 11/1/94
Future DeveloDment
Any future development of the parcel would require additional action by the City by holding
public hearings and receiving input from residents. All actions would be subject to further City
processing as follows:
1. Should the vacation be approved and the applicant wish to develop the property as now
zoned, they would be required to fIle an initial study and a subdivision map (for five or
more parcels) on the property showing the proposed parcels. Processing would be
subject to a public hearing before the City Planning Commission and the City Council.
2. Should the applicant propose an increase in density for the property but still within the
General Plan range of 3-6 dwelling units per acre, it would be necessary to file a
rezoning request in addition to the environmental analysis and the subdivision map
process and the zone change would require a public hearing before the Planning
Commission and the City Council with notification to residents.
3. Should the applicant seek a density increase above the low-medium density range of the
General Plan (3-6 dwelling units per acre), the next highest category (medium density)
is 6-11 dwelling units per acre which would require an amendment to the General Plan
as well as the rezoning application, initial study and subdivision processing necessitating
public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council. It should be noted
that any zone change consideration for property from an R-l category to an R-3 category
requires a unanimous vote of the City Council, per the Cummings initiative that was
passed several years ago. This was the initiative that was passed several years ago that
required us to set up a growth control process, and made it harder to upgrade zoning.
4. Should the applicant desire to develop the property into four parcels or less under the
present zoning category, the applicant would file an initial study as well as a parcel map
which is processed at staff level, therefore, the staff approval is final unless appeals are
filed setting a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Any development of the
parcel map process again requires environmental review as well.
Safety Commission's Recommendation of limiting Access to AIDine Avenue
The Safety Commission recommended that, if the vacation is approved, access to Alpine Avenue
be prohibited from the applicants property upon development. Upon review of this condition
by the Planning and Public Works Departments, it is requested that the requirement for access
to Alpine Avenue be subject to the approval of the City Engineer rather than a specific
prohibition. The primary reason being that a complete prohibition of access on to Alpine
Avenue may not be prudent based upon the potential for two lots being created towards the west
end of the project, thus requiring a flag lot design to provide access only to Naples Street. Staff
would prefer to hold this option open until a development plan is put forth for complete
evaluation.
l \-'-
Page 7, Item "
Meeting Date 11/1/94
Noise Imnacts
A noise analysis was performed based upon the impacts of the project with the following
conclusions:
1. "Baseline levels are sufficiently low on Alpine to accommodate an additional estimated
3,000 vehicles and still meet the 65 Db CNEL standard."
2. "Speed reduction will allow the diverted Moss Street traffic to be placed on a portion of
Naples with no significant change in the acoustic environment. "
3. "There are no significant noise impacts associated with the project implementation (the
street vacation) that require any mitigation. "
4. "Depending upon site layout, the new residences on the triangle parcel may require a
noise wall if side yard or rear yard space abuts on the Naples Street right-of-way. Noise
exposure will need to be evaluated during environmental clearance for the residential
project. "
Onnosition to Vacation
At both the Safety and Planning Commission meetings, a number of residents registered their
complaints relative to this proposed vacation and realignment. A number of letters of opposition
have been received as well as a petition against the vacation containing 67 signatures. The main
concerns were:
1. Increased traffic on Naples Street and Alpine Avenue
Answer: Staff agrees that the proposed closing of Moss Street will divert traffic to the
intersection of Alpine Avenue and Naples Street. An increase in stacking is unavoidable
at the intersection during peak hours due to the realignment. The applicant will be
required to widen Alpine Avenue and provide a right and left turn lane at that
intersection. Staff believes that with the installation of the street improvements and an
all way stop, the traffic would flow satisfactorily (see Exhibit "E"). Staff feels that the
traffic flow on Moss and Naples Streets will remain essentially the same as they currently
exists. Staff anticipates that there will be a minor increase on Naples Street of 5 percent
or less. Staff believes that the westbound motorists intending to go to Moss Street west
of Third Avenue or to the portion of Moss Street east of Third Avenue will still turn on
Alpine Avenue rather than go the 1/4 mile out of the way through at least one more
traffic signal to stay on Naples Street.
2. The request for a waiver of sidewalk along the north side of Moss Street between
Alpine Avenue and Third Avenue which could, according to the individuals
testifying, encourage schoolchildren to use Naples Street with its lack of
sidewalk.
1\ -1
Page 8, Item~
Meeting Date 11/1/94
Answer: Staff believes that the lack of sidewalk on the north side of Moss Street has
little bearing on the amount on foot traffic on Naples Street. Moss Street has sidewalk
on the south side, and there is no reason for schoolchildren to walk on the north side.
3. Increased noise and air pollution
Answer: As a result of the realignment closure of the Moss Streett Naples intersection
and the increased in traffic trips to the widened portion of Alpine Avenue there would
be an increase in noise at that location. With the increase in the number of vehicles at
the Alpine Avenue segment their will be an unavoidably increase air pollution at that
location. The air pollution for the overall area should not be affected.
4. Speed of traffic on Moss and Naples Streets
Answer: Installation of the all-way stop should help to slow the traffic on Naples and
Moss Streets in the vicinity of Alpine Avenue.
5. Concerns relating to left turns from both sides of Alpine Avenue onto Naples
Street.
Answer: Although the distance on Naples Street between the two legs of Alpine Avenue
is relatively short, staff feels that motorists at the stop sign will have adequate time to
judge whether the turn is safe. This combined with the very low traffic volume on the
south leg of Alpine Avenue (260 ADT) and the offset of the intersections in the direction
favorable to the flow of traffic, should prevent conflicting movements.
6. Residents were concerned that the parcel would be developed with higher density
than they feel should be allowed.
Answer: The vacation will not be effective until the applicant receives approval by the
City of the proposed development of the property. Residents would be notified of the
proposed development or any other changes which might be proposed. Any change in
zoning to increase density would require hearings before the Planning Commission and
City Council as previously discussed.
Public Notice
Due to the amount of opposition which has been generated against this project, staff has
exceeded the public hearing notification area to include property owners within a radius of 1,000
feet (instead of the required 300 feet) around the affected portion of Moss Street, plus all signers
of the above-mentioned petition, plus owners of properties on Second Avenue between Moss and
Naples Streets, Karen Way (the cui de sac north of Naples Street), along Moss Street and Naples
Street between Alpine Avenue and Third Avenue, with the exception of the condominium owners
at the west end of Moss Street near Third Avenue.
\\-.g
Page 9, Item---11-
Meeting Date 11/1/94
Conclusion
This is an opportunity for the City to clean up an area that may otherwise remain "under
improved". For example:
1. No curb and gutter along Moss Street between Third Avenue and Naples Street
2. No curb, gutter and sidewalk along Naples between Alpine Avenue (north side)
and Moss Street
3. Less than desirable intersection angle for Naples Street and Moss Street.
This area adjacent to the Country Club between Third Avenue and Naples Street could be
improved at no cost to the City or the Country Club. Staff believes that most of the concerns
of the Citizens could be mitigated by a stop sign at Naples Street and Alpine Avenue (northerly
extension) and by having Council approval of development plans for the triangular parcel prior
to recording the resolution of vacation.
Recommendation
After reviewing past studies and their recommendations regarding the vacation and realignment,
staff maintains the position that the most practical means to realign the intersection is to vacate
the portion of Moss Street similar to that proposed by the applicant.
Following the direction of the Safety and Planning Commissions, staff recommends that Council
adopt a resolution ordering the vacation of Moss Street as proposed by the applicant with the
following conditions:
1. Owner/developer shall pay the City $100,000 or, at the Council's option, install missing
street improvements along the north side of Moss Street (from Alpine Avenue to Third
Avenue) to City standards, except that no sidewalk will be required.
2. An all-way stop will be established at the intersection of Naples Street and the portion
of Alpine Avenue north of Naples Street.
3. The owner/developer shall dedicate sufficient street right-of-way to widen Alpine Avenue
north of Naples to 52 feet curb-to-curb in order to facilitate traffic flow at the
intersection.
4. The developer/owner will install all needed street improvements along the parcel's Alpine
Avenue and Naples Street frontages when the physical closing of Moss Street takes place.
5. Retain an easement 20 feet wide for Sweetwater Authority along the northerly side of
Moss Street.
\ \-~
Page 10, Item----LL-
Meeting Date 11/1/94
6. Restrict access to Alpine Avenue to those locations approved by the City Engineer and
Director of Planning.
7. Require all discretionary approvals by the City to be approved prior to completion and
recordation of the street vacation.
FISCAL IMPACT: All costs to process the vacation are paid by the applicant. Income from
compensation of $100,000 for the right-of-way if the cash offer is accepted by Council, none
if the improvements are not considered as compensation.
A copy of the Negative Declaration for the Initial Study is on fIle in the City Clerk's office.
Attachments: Exhibit ~ A.: Plat showing areas to be vacated and the vacant parcel
Exhibit "B.: Copy of report to Council on request by San Diego Countly Club for relief from requirements to install improvementll
along the north side of Moss Street.
Exhibit "C.: Plat showing alignment of MOllS Street (if subject portion ill vacated) as recommended by the Safety Commission
Exhibit "D": Plat showing an aI:temate alig:mnent suggested (but not recommended).
Exhibit "E": Plat showing recommended improvements to be done at new intersection
Exhibit "F": Safety Commission Minutes from m~ 0[9/9/93
Exhibit "0": P1anning Commission Minutes from meetq: of 10/27/93
Exbt'bit "R": Resource Conservation Commission Minutes from meeting 11/22/93
Exhibit "r: Re8idential Notification List
File No. PV"()57
W AUl1WHJJPL [M:\HOME\ENGlNEER\AGENDA\RESO _V AC.JWH]
1\-10
RESOLUTION NO. \'t""o\f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION
OF MOSS STREET FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH
NAPLES STREET WESTERLY TO ALPINE AVENUE, NORTH
OF NAPLES STREET
WHEREAS, Country Club Villa Estates, owner of the
triangular piece of property between Moss and Naples Streets
westerly of the juncture of those streets has requested that the
City vacate the portion of Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and
the aforementioned intersection; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Streets and
Highways Code, the Council adopted Resolution No. 17681 at its
meeting on October 4, 1994, setting the associated pUblic hearing
for November 1, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the Resource Conservation commission considered
the Negative Declaration at its meeting of November 22, 1993 and
voted 5-0 to accept the Negative Declaration for IS 94-01 (Moss
Street Vacation); and
WHEREAS, at its meeting held September 9, 1993, the
Safety Commission approved a staff report by a vote of 6-0
recommending that the street be vacated with three conditions:
a. Widen Alpine Avenue between Moss and Naples Streets
to 52 feet (curb-to-curb)
b. Provide an all-way "STOP" at the intersection
c. Prohibit access to Alpine Avenue from applicant's
property
WHEREAS, at a public hearing held October 27, 1993, the
Planning Commission found that the proposed vacation would be
consistent with the existing General Plan; however, the Planning
Commission recommended on a vote of 6-0-0-1 (Commissioner Fuller
abstaining due to a conflict of interest) that the issue of the
vacation be considered in conjunction with the proposed development
of the property and not separate from it and staff concurs with
this requirement; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting held on October 4, 1994, Council
adopted Resolution 17681 stating the Council's intent to vacate a
portion of Moss Street; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with S8320 of the Streets and
Highways Code, the resolution also set November 1, 1994 at 6:00
p.m. as the date and time for the public hearing for the Council to
consider this matter; and
\\-\\
&1)
WHEREAS, notices required by Streets and Highways Code
S8323 have been posted; and
WHEREAS, Tuesday, the 1st day of November, 1994 at 6:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers of the city of Chula Vista was fixed
as the time and place for hearing any objections to such vacation,
and the Council having heard all interested persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby order the vacation of the subject
portion of Moss Street, more particularly described in Attachment
1, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set
forth in full, with the following conditions:
1. The owner/developer pay the City $100,000 for the vacated
right-of-way (or, at the Council's option, install
missing curb and gutter along the north side of Moss
Street from Alpine Avenue to Third Avenue).
2. An all-way stop at the intersection of Naples Street and
the portion of Alpine Avenue north of Naples Street.
3. Alpine Avenue north of Naples widened to 52 feet curb-to-
curb with dedication of the needed right-of-way.
4. The developer/owner of the triangular parcel install all
needed street improvements along the parcel's Alpine
Avenue and Naples Street frontages.
5. Retain an easement 20 feet wide for Sweetwater Authority.
6. Restrict access to Alpine Avenue to those locations
approved by the City Engineer and Director of Planning.
7. Completion of all discretionary approvals for the
development of the parcel.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to record a certified copy of this resolution with the
office of the San Diego County Recorder.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard, City
Attorney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\re\vacation
1\- \ L-
~!
ATTACHMENT 1
.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
THE VACATION OF MOSS STREET
BETWEEN ALPINE AVENUE AND NAPLES STREET
PARCEL 1 AND 2
PARCEL 1:
A PORTION OF LOT 15 IN QUARTER SECTION 120 OF CHULA VISTA, IN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO.505, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 13, 1888, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOW,:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ROBINHOOD SUBDIVISION NO.
2/ ACCORDING TO Y~P NO. 3488, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING ~LSO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF MOSS STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 2,740
FOOT RADIUS CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 4047'51" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 2,740 FEET FROM SAID CORNER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID ARC, A DISTANCE OF 32.59 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING J>.LONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, A
DISTANCE OF 383.63 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF NAPLES STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIXTH STREET, AS
SHO~~ ON SAID MAP NO. 505/ SAID POINT HAVING A RADIAL LINE ~~ICH
BEARS NORTH 30 54' 21" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 71023' WEST ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE OF NJ>~LES STREET, A DISTANCE OF 143.80 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE ARC OF A 2,780 FOOT RADIUS CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF ~~ICH BEARS
NORTH 1"02'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,780 FEET FROM SJ>.ID POINT;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4048'39", A DISTANCE OF 233.42 FEET; THENCE NORTH
18031' WEST, 43.2" FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PAGE 1 OF 2
\\ ~ I~
.
PARCEL 2:
A PORTION OF LOT 15 IN QUARTER SECTION 120 OF CHULA VISTA, IN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALI FORNI1>.,
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 505/ FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Y~RCH 13, 1888.
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE WESTERLY HALF OF FIFTH AVENUE, AS
VACATED, ADJOINING SAID LOT 15 ON THE EAST, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ROBINHOOD SUBDIVISION NO.
2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 3488, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF MOSS STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 2,740
FOOT R1>.DIUS CIRCLE, Ti-IE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 4047'51" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 2,740 FEET FROM SAID CORNER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID ALONG SAID ARC, A DISTANCE OF 32.59 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE,
A DISTANCE OF 383.63 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF NAPLES STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIXTH STREET, AS
SHO~~ ON SAID MAP NO. 505, SAID POINT HAVING A RADIAL LINE WHICH
BEARS NORTH 3054' 21" WEST; THENCE NORTH 71023' EAST 1>.LONG SAID
NORTH LINE OF NAPLES STREET, 179.5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE ARC OF A
2,700 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, CONCENTRIC WITH
SAID 2,740 FOOT RADIUS CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID 2,700
FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID 2,740 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
BEARING NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RADIAL LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING ANY PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAID
VACATED FIFTH J>.VENUE ADJOINING LOT 15 ON THE EAST.
PAGE 2 OF 2
\\_\~/II-J~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
Considering request for vacation of street right-of-way by Cox and Associates,
representing Country Club Estates.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
November 1, 1994, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: October 12, 1994
(7___~L
loj\S
q..
10/1-2-
5.o:t:J1
s~
JJ~ / ~
MEMORANDUM
-J~'c-
...
October 10, 1994
File No. PV-057
FROM:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk ro
John W. Hardesty, Permits Engin~
TO:
SUBJECT:
Notice for Star News inre Moss Street Vacation
Beverly, attached is the notice of public hearing for the Moss Street vacation pursuant
to Council Resolution 17681. Please forward to the Star News in time to have it
published two consecutive weeks before the hearing scheduled for November 1st.
If you have any problems with the time limits, let me know. Or if you have any
questions, give me a call at 5115.
Thank you.
JWH
Attachment
J)- ) 7
.
INFORMATION FOR PUBLIC NOTICE FOR PUBLIC HEARING OCTOBER 25, 1994
Public Hearing on Billing Residential Sewer Charges on the County
Property Tax Bill and Non-Residential Sewer Charges In-House
Starting July 1, 1995.
Staff report recommends that Council approve the Resolution
directing staff to continue with the steps necessary to transfer
sewer and storm drain customer billing from Sweetwater Authority
and Otay Water District to the County property tax rolls for
residential service and to an in-house billing system for non-
residential service starting July 1, 1995. For more information or
a copy of the report, call 691-5117.
SMC: SBWSTNWS. NOT
/J- / '6'
;: ~
~
.,
"
'-
.-
--"
~
.'
\ \ ~Y'
.. c:. ..'.
~ , i ~~ :;,
f\:'b:l t ~ l:;'
~ C"'I...........~ ~
"'f\~,,~ ..:
, ':-{ \
...", ~~ ~ "
o .... ~.~~ 'lo I
"'!" '" ~ j
~ on ~I \
~. ~~~ ..
~I:::Ci~"'" ... \
.l.....~ , I "
'"I.. "" \ ""bl \
~1~~\~~~t,
~ ~ "" <:; I ~ .
~:: '\~ a::~
~ ~ < g~
'-'"
\,
/
/
!
/
/
/
!
!
/
/
/
/~
/ ~
/
/
/
/
I
/
/
/
I /
"'1 /
I I
i /
,V
7
'I
J
I
7
~~~
,
j
I
I
t
I~
~?H~ ~
~ It>
~ 5:)f'\~~ C
~ ~ C:l~ ~ 3
'."':ll ~ ~
"'"'1 ...c:. ~ ..........
..,. ~~ t) l
, '" -,. ~
\) Ct ........ (I)
c:\ ~ ~ a
):. ~ ~
))/d.-) /; ~~~~t ~
/ :1 / / -,lJ..'}J
"
/
" ' /
..
-:l1/J
:
..
"
~..
I'
t\
~
,
~':1
~~ I'
, .
2 g> .
-,
"il' I
~ , ~
~ ~
"
~~ I
~ I
~~
~ > I
" ,
~~ i
S ~
...:t-
~
...,. '.'1,,;1 ,~~!!iiHm I "
" +~': I':; '!'1!~1~ I; ~ll! );~
.. I \ji ;: i ~ !: :11: " '1I1l:l1 i i
" : :'j: Iii: !~'!I!!I~t !!~' l:
h" ", 'il:!i:;:lil.ll!::
'..I;i;,' :
,
:::
",ii:,l"i::I!1
:i;iiil,j;il: ',k
.'\: ,;d:,:1 :::: 'il;' ,r 'I,~'
..", I,ll' ." 1'1",'111
~, I : ,I::~ .' (;, ":,:1':.
I
I 'I:;)
~::; I " ::1. ii ':; . i ! ..: ":~R!. , "
~ I "::; I,'t. ..
!it I",' I I 1 ""'il:
. :.. "'1"-1" 1 '::1,.:
~l 1::.1,::;1':,,': :" I I.'''''i.
~~ ::' lill;;:' I::,,~ '. I! ":II::!: ::;'l""lr';!:
..~I" 'I' "'1 : I !II'..
10, I 1.1. III I' II, ,!I'
.~J '1::li. ,~r ....~ j;",". '+'I!' '~,
.1'.'1' '.',;:' , ~ ,.."'.! j I" "
! I i ~ ~kr~'J r 1 ..
II B ~'3 :,; I i I:
:"'1"'" .. '" ',,:/"'1';'" .. .,,, . ~ I :'\ I ,1"",:,".
1 I I I" ~>::1II r-- 00; I i
,.I. 'JI' I; ,.' ,..;1 h~t.loi n: ~, . I : i ! ..
.4,.1 I'. ..' ' .'hl' ~~,[. II. i .1 '.'
1"+ ~ ;, ! .1 "! .i i 1 i
::i;lhil~., fl""::i ~l.:. '!I I i \
till!! j: ;t.~' t"'. ~~',..' '1 I IiI
".1 I". ',' f" I I., I 1-
.,: ;',:, J:; i",b,..~ ill fa. "I '=' 1 I ! 1
":,,;';'1".' .,~;. -~ ;,1. '. ~ I J ,
':!;ii ::'1' ,:1. i ,~:.:.. :-.;' ~ !,;..: l.. ; ').:'1'
: !~,!: I' ~~.~:'~, !II,IX' ~ "bc:~
. I . ,f ,~" ~ I.' ~ I I i ::"r;:
" 1'::1, I'I.....::~: b..' i'".t! ". i i I ~!"1
H'I!! ',' '!:~;:I::'- ,,1.::"'1 :1' 1:"1 ~
:::i ,.:, ~;::I!!I. !:;. ,. :: l' ;'~t : !! il:~: l. "1:
" : : ti' ,:h1ii ,," jl ::li iLl., j~" Iii j " !~1 ,1'
,. :t:li:' :Ht;:~i! : :I!:)'i:;,,'rl "li:I!' ,~ J;
.iI
'I: ilii; iH iili i:i! il!: ::,; .-~ :I' 1\ ~ I i I::.. I': ,
"')1,:' ,) ".ilii11!!';. ':':1," "::!\, ~: II ~ '
"!"",,!lld~'" '.")'~i IiIIo
1;!1,;1 r:L!j. !;i;IIHll!!:i. I ~ f' I 11:,;" >:
,j'".. ,:,1 iii. .. ./111:1"'.; ~ 'j I' 't.;;:
ii:' "~"'i:'1! ;~! !..~ I!i:~!:i ih I,;: I ~! ,i 'I! I: . II :1:,1:,
r:' :d1i';>- I ! .:~ . I ! i .J" l..~ J..l,L
,:1"".1..]:::.'" ',I.. :-;,1".1.,1"."""
:::, ;:.t::l : :::, I I :. 1:':' i r' :'!I 1;:'!F)~l, ,. ' ~
lr': lii~liHili ii, "j j I 1:1;:. ,I
'iliilr !:!iIlHlpl: :i: "li::[:(:::L
.II!. 'I jl.I:"!"i:.iii::,
l! t! ;'" _ - II: II u: ~ I 'l . .
Iijih'~II!:i,!IIH!W 'i . ";" :.:1 !j'll',:; f}l~i,! 1i;:;
'::111'1 L li!!!lll: H' :: " 1" I I I: ~;;: i
~~,.'" ;':::"1111'1'1."'1'1 ",.n.,:
'."'.'ttl"'i:'!il'i.
~"'.''''''''''i .,~;;:!i:I;",I"ill!I!I.1 ';::rJ",
I"~ ,,' ~,'I ! , .. .,,".'il j 1.~r! \!~H
,ill. i"'I!::! ::1, ,:
, ::::'tli 1 I ":Ii:;: !!it
!I:~ d'! !!:-I;H i ',:,,~~ li;:I:111 ,I ! i. I ': I!\:~:
'i:i!:l':'l.:: III
j' i ,'. L . .!.,..~ I" 1\;,; iit
::.'I:!:!:: t :\:):tII11i, !ii.l: ';'
iii" .' :,11' ::':" .\t::al:..l;..:Ii'i;I~l' 'Ii. ' .lil.H' v.l I;',; : I
'...... ,~, 1'.111 I:'~' ,,1':1 :',;!,;"liiil:,.j. .
I" '''. :i,I::' .:") " ' 1,;;1,1111:111 '
I. . ". '. ': :1 ,I: ill' I'll '. :,r ' :1:, "11m \i'. l:!it,.,..'.. I,.. ~, . ~l~; , . 1:
.....l..... ". ... 'II
T"":'0-p1' . h,o ..' ';'\ j ."j \i'. ~~b...: :'1'II,\:.:I!"
'I". :";l ,.,.1 ,I, . ." '.,d'.i..:: I
- ~ '1''' 'I W.il:1 'IL~,rr. 'd\\,I,.';]I;"I'!'-"
",,,,.1"111,:. "'. .... . ... I"
:!" \:' Ii:;"~ ',i.iI1ilj, ' '.."1,;1.1".,,1.,1,,, 1;,'1
I ';:'." I '1IIIill: ,;1 I I lcd': I i I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
ALPINE AVENUE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY
I have lived in the area a~und Moss St. - Alpine Ave. - Naples St. in Chula
Vista, California for ,~ years.
To my knowledge, there has never been any barricade, notice, restriction,
barrier, or obstruction on the triangle lot (with bordering streets of Moss,
Alpine, and Naples) to impede traffic from using this lot to go from Alpine
Avenue from the South side of Naples straight across to where it intersects
Moss Street.
J en'<l}\-e L ~rJ~A
printed name
~OM_d~o~J
('Signature
There were 200 statements presented following this statement.
J!lJlff" J
jJ-J)..
"~
ADDENDUM TO IS-94-01 VACATION OF A PORTION OF MOSS STREET
PROJECT NAME: Vacation of a portion of Moss Street
PROJECT LOCATION: Moss Street between Naples Street and Alpine Avenue
PROJECT APPLICANT: San Diego Country Club and Country Club Villa Estates
PROJECT AGENT:
Greg Cox of Cox and Associates
CASE NO.:
IS-94-0l
I. INTRODUCTION
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review
Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact
Report, if one of the following conditions is present:
1 The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the
Final EIR or Negative Declaration have not created any new significant environmental
impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration;
2. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Final ErR or
Negative Declaration regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or
regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental
effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant
impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final ErR or Negative Declaration.
This addendum has been prepared in order to amend the project description to include additional
requirements that will improve traffic circulation These minor changes are improvements to the
project and will further reduce the potential of any significant environmental impacts. As a result of
this analysis, the basic conclusions within the negative declaration have not changed. All impacts are
found to be less than significant. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA
Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to the negative declaration for the vacation
of a portion of Moss Street.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project originally consisted of the vacation or closing of a 30,800 sq. ft. section of Moss
Street east of Alpine Avenue and west of First Avenue. The northern portion of Moss Street will
become part of the holdings of the San Diego Country Club and the southern half would be added to
the triangularly shaped parcel to the south. Discretionary actions that are required for this include the
//,1:2)
finding of General Plan Consistency and the action for approval of the closing of Moss Street. The
applicant's eventual plan is that the San Diego Country Club will quit-claim or transfer title of their
portion of Moss Street to the County Club Villa Estate's partnership in consideration of the Country
Club Villa Estate's partnership installing the missing curbs and gutters on the San Diego Country Club
side of the Street. Access to the property will be allowed along Naples; however, access on Moss
Street will be limited to one driveway at a location determined to provide safe ingress and egress by
the City Traffic Engineer. The applicant eventually plans to apply for a tentative parcel map for 4
units or subdivide the property into 5 units. Under the original project description, the applicant was
required to widen Alpine A venue from the current 20 feet to 52 feet. The developer will install curb
and gutter, and pavement along the north side of Moss Street between Third Avenue and Alpine
A venue. The installation of street improvements on the east side of Alpine Avenue between Moss
Street and Naples Street and pavement, curb, and gutter on the north side of Naples Street, between
Alpine Avenue and the current intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street will be a requirement
of the development of the triangular parcel. The amended project description includes a stop sign
installed on Naples at Moss Street, to create a three-way stop controlled intersection and attendant
warning devices as deemed necessary by the City Traffic Engineer. These traffic measures enhance
traffic safety and provide more efficient flow of traffic within this area adjacent to the project. These
street improvements were included to address the traffic concerns of residents.
III. PROJECT SETTING
The project setting consists of a 30,800 square foot section of Moss Street immediately east of the
westerly stub street of Alpine Avenue and immediately north of the intersection of First Avenue and
Naples Street. Immediately south of the above described section of Moss Street is a vacant 8,322.98
square foot triangular piece of vacant land. Single family homes are located to the west across Alpine
Avenue and to the south across Naples Street. The San Diego Country Club, a golf course with club
house facilities, is located to the immediate north of Moss Street. To the east of the proposed project
is neighborhood shopping.
III. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
Traffic
The negative declaration analyzed potential environmental effects of the project and found that all
impacts could be mitigated to a level below significance. Some of the concerns raised by residents
subsequent to the negative declaration being posted with the County of San Diego on September 27,
1993, included concerns of: (1) Increased traffic and high speed, (2) Stacking of traffic on Alpine
going onto Naples, (3) Air Quality, (4) Safety of children going to school and (5) that the closing of
Moss Street at Alpine would create a knuckle of 90 degrees which would be dangerous. Engineering
staff responded as follows:
(1) Increased traffic and high saeed - The proposed project intersection is currently at Level of
Service (LOS) "A" and will remain at "A" after the project is completed. Traffic flow will
improve in the area. Conflicts with other vehicles will be reduced from the widening, which
will allow separate turning lanes. Traffic will also slow down with the installation of a stop
sign on Naples at Moss Street, creating an all-way stop.
J/-~Y
(2) Stacking of traffic on Aloine going on to Naoles - The requirement that the applicant install
an all-way stop at the North end of Alpine will reduce the queuing effect caused by motorists
waiting for an adequate gap in traffic. The street section of Naples that the applicant will be
required to construct would adequately handle the expected traffic in the area.
(3) Air Oualitv - Concern was raised about the air quality at Moss where it intersects with Naples
as a result of traffic that is sometimes backed up, going east six to eight cars deep. Staff
consulted with an Air Quality expert who stated that the project is in conformance with the
existing Air Basin Plan.
(4) Safety of Children - Residents stated that it would be dangerous for elementary school children
to walk to school along Naples without a sidewalk. The addition of a stop sign installed on
Naples at Moss to create a three-way stop controlled intersection and attendent warning devices
will improve the safety of the area. If the applicant does proceed at a later date with plans for
a subdivison, then the applicant would be required to fund the construction of sidewalks within
the subdivision and may be required to fund some of the offsite infrasture as well.
(5) Closing of Moss Street creating a "Dogleg" - Concerns were raised that the closing off of Moss
Street at Alpine would create a "dogleg" of 90 degrees which would be quite dangerous with
the rate of speed the cars traveling on Moss Street. The traffic engineering staff will review
the proposed plans when submitted and will apply applicable City and State roadway standards.
V. CONCLUSION
Traffic impacts are found to be less than significant and within the acceptable range of LOS C or
better in accordance with the City of Chula Vista's General Plan. Pursuant to Section 15164 of the
State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that the project revisions
to the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary
to make the Negative Declaration adequate under CEQA.
REFERENCES
General Plan, City of Chula Vista
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures
EIR-89-11
Memorandum from Hans Giroux to Barbara Reid, 10/22/93 and telephone conservation re: Air Quality
J/ /0225
negative
declaration
PROJECT NAME
Vacation of a Portion of Moss Street
PROJECT LOCATION
Moss Street between Naples Street and Alpine Avenue
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO' Not applicable as streets fall under the non-assessed tax roll
PROJECT APPLICANT
San Diego Country Club and Country Club Villa Estates
CASE NO' IS-94-01
DATE. September 27, 1993
A. Proiect Setting
The project setting consists of a 30,800 square foot sec.tion of Moss Street immediately east of
the westerly stub street of Alpine Avenue and immediately north of the intersection of First
Avenue and Naples Street. Immediately south of the above described section of Moss Street is
a vacant 8,322.98 square foot triangular piece of vacant land. Single family homes are located
to the west across Alpine A venue and to the south across Naples Street. The San Diego Country
Club, a golf course with club house facilities, is located to the immediate north of Moss Street.
To the east of the proposed project is neighborhood shopping.
B. Proiect Descriotion
The project description consists of the vacation or closing of a 30,800 sq. ft. section of Moss
Street east of Alpine A venue and west of First A venue. The northern portion of Moss Street will
become part of the holdings of the San Diego Country Club and the southern half would be added
to the triangularly shaped parcel to the south. Discretionary actions that are required for this
include the finding of General Plan Consistency and the action for approval of the closing of
Moss Street. The applicant's eventual plan is that the San Diego Country Club will quit-claim or
transfer title of their portion of Moss Street to the Country Club Villa Estates in consideration
of the Country Club Villa Estates installing the missing curbs and gutters on the San Diego
Country Club side of the Street - the remaining portion of Moss from Third Avenue to the
realigned Moss stub street of Alpine. Access to the property will be allowed along" Naples;
however, access on Moss Street will be limited to one driveway at a location determined to
provide safe ingress and egress as determined by the City Traffic Engineer The applicant
eventually plans to apply for a tentative parcel map for 4 units or subdivide the property into 5
units.
C. Comoatibilitv with Zoning and Plans
The eventual plans to apply for a tentative parcel map for 4 units or a subdivision for 5 units will
be in compliance with the zoning and General Plan designation for the project site, which is
single family residential.
J / - 1. ;..fR city of
~l~
-.-
....-....;~-o:..:
~- ~
chula vista planning department
environmental review section
erlY OF
CHUIA VISTA
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project will
not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report will not be required. A Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with
Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Traffic
Traffic Engineering has determined several traffic measures should be implemented relating to
the proposed vacation of Moss Street. The applicant must allow for an increase of right-of-way
on Naples and Alpine Street adjacent to the southern parcel on Moss Street in accordance with
the City of Chula Vista roadway design standards. The applicant is proposing to install curb and
gutters within a 3 year period from the transfer of property subsequent to the approval of the
street vacation. The project will include stop sign controls at Moss Street and Naples Street and
attendant warning devices as deemed necessary by the City Traffic Engineer. A stop sign will
be installed on Naples at Moss Street to create a three-way stop controlled intersection. The
applicant must provide a 52' roadway which will be an expansion from the existing 20' roadway.
These traffic measures enhance traffic safety and provide more efficient flow of traffic within this
area adjacent to the project.
E. Water
Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the applicant must agree to
no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set
program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
F Mitigation necessarv to avoid significant effects
As no significant effects are expected mitigation measures are not necessary
G. Mandatorv Findings of Significance
Based on the following fmdings, it is determined that the project described above will not have
a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fIsh or wildlife species, cause a fIsh or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California
history or prehistory.
The proposed project, the vacation of Moss 8.treet does not have the potential to degrade
or reduce any existing habitat as the project consists of the closing of a street and has
therefore been denuded of any habitat long ago.
-2-
) /-;2~ I
/J Ii
! .
2. The project has the potential to achieve short-tenn environmental goals to the
disadvantage of long-tenn environmental goals.
This project is consistent with the general plan and does not have the potential to achieve
short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals with
guidelines.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects.
This project does not have the potential to have effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. The main concern raised by residents was in regard to traffic
flow The traffic engineers who reviewed the project have determined that the inclusion
of: stop signs on Naples at Moss Street to create a three-way stop controlled intersection.
and provision of a 52' roadway which will be an expansion from the existing 20'roadway
will enhance traffic safety and provide a more efficient flow of traffic within this area.
Staff are confident that, based on this determination, the project does not have
cumulatively considerable impacts.
4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly.
The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings either
directly or indirectly as it must meet all Code requirements and requirements of various
City departments.
H. Consultation
1 Individuals and Orl!anizations
City of Chula Vista:
Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Frank Herrera-A, Planning
Martin Miller, Planning
Steve Griffin, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Alex Saucedo, Building Department
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Rod Hastie, Fire Department
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Mary Jane Diosdado, Police Department
Martin Schmidt, Parks and Recreation Department
-3- J / - 0202 fS'
Barbara Reid, Planning
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: San Diego Country Club and Country Club Villa Estates
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan
Safety Commission Report, 9/9/93
Speed Limit - Engineering/Traffic Survey' Naples Street (Third Avenue-First Avenue)
Naples Street (First Avenue-Hilltop Drive)
Memorandum from Hans Giroux to Barbara Reid, 10/22/93
3 Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments
received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period
for the Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
\MOSS.ND
-4-
/ / -.22 /
Case No. 94-01
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1 Name of Proponent: San Diego Country Club & Country Club
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 250 Bonita Glen Drive Estates
Chula Vista. CA 91910
3. Date of Checklist: SeDtember 27. 1993
4 Name of Proposal: Vacation of a Dortion of Moss Street
5. Initial Study Number: 94-01
En~onmentalImpacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? D D .
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? D D .
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? D D .
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? D D .
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? D D .
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? D D .
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? D D .
jj-.23tJ
Page 1
ICHECKLST.MOS
Comments:
As the site currently is developed as a road and the proposal is to vacate the road, there are
no changes in conditions expected that could lead to an increase in wind or water erosion.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality? D D .
b. The creation of objectionable odors? D D .
c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally? D D .
Comments:
The project is in conformance with the existing Air Basin Plan.
3 Water. Will the Proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? D D .
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff? D D .
c. Alterations to the course or flow or
flood waters? D D .
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? D D .
e. Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity? D D .
f. Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters? D D .
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations? D D .
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies? D D .
\CHECKLST.MOS II ~.2 :J / Page 2
i.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or
tidal waves?
D
D
.
Comments:
This project is not in the Coastal Zone and there are no rivers or wetlands or other sensitive
aquatic resources within the inunediate area that could be impacted by the project.
4.
The Threshold/Standards Policy does not apply to this project.
Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants)?
D
.
D
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants?
D
.
D
c.
Introduction of new species of plants into
into an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species?
D
.
D
d.
Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop?
D
D
.
Comments:
The project is in an urbanized area of the City and the site is developed as a road. The
project will not result in any changes in diversity of plant or animal species.
5
Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)?
D
.
D
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals?
D
D
.
c.
Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals?
D
D
.
d.
Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat?
D
D
.
\CHECKLST .MOS
j/-.23d-.-
Page 3
Comments:
The project is in an urbanized area of the City and the site is developed as a road. The
project will not result in any changes in diversity of plant or animal species.
6.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increases in existing noise levels?
o
o
.
b.
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
o
o
.
Comments :
It is expected that the traffic that currently travels on Moss Street will begin to use
Naples. As a result of this change, the homes on the westerly stub street of Alpine
Avenue would experience less traffic and noise. The homes along the south side of
Naples may experience additional noise from additional travelers along that route.
However, discussion with our acoustician has determined that the additional traffic
will not bring the noise to a level of significance.
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
YES MAYBE NO
o 0 .
Comments:
There may be additional light along N aples Avenue as a result of the vacation of Moss Street
but is not expected to be above the level of significance.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The vacation of Moss Street will improve traffic circulation and the land use will
coincide with the surrounding residential land designation in the general plan.
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
o
o
.
Comments:
No natural resources are expected to be impacted. The proposal, therefore, is not
expected to increase the rate of the use of natural resources.
10.
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
o
o
.
ICHECKLST.MOS
//~d-.J3
Page 4
b.
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
o
o
.
Comments:
No hazardous materials or substances will be stored on site. Therefore, there cannot be a
risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset
conditions.
Population. Will the proposal alter the location
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population or an area?
II.
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The proposed project involves the vacation of Moss Street and will not involve the
construction of more residential units. The population will not increase. A tentative parcel
map or subdivision map for the division of the project site into no more than 5 parcels may
be submitted in the future. This future proposal for the use of the site will increase
population, but the impact of five families would be below the level of significance.
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The proposed project will not involve the construction of any new housing and will not create
a demand for more housing in the project area. A future project may involve the building
of a small number of homes but this would not place a significant demand on current services
and natural resources in the project area.
13
Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement?
o
.
o
b.
Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking?
o
o
.
c.
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
o
o
.
d.
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods?
o
o
.
e.
Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic?
o
.
o
f.
Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
o
o
.
\CHECKLST.MOS
Page 5
jj';)}f
g.
A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of
2400 or more average daily vehicle trips
or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips).
o
o
.
Comments:
The proposed project will shift traffic from Moss Street to Naples Street. However, impacts
to traffic and circulation are not significant. The proposed project street improvements will
improve circulation and safety at the intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street.
14 Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? 0 0 .
b. Police protection? 0 0 .
c. Schools? 0 0 .
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 .
e. Libraries? 0 0 .
f. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? 0 0 .
g. Other governmental services? 0 0 .
Comments:
Traffic Engineering staff recommends that the roadway be expanded to 52 feet, that access
to the property be allowed along Naples but limited on Moss Street to one driveway at a
location determined to provide safe ingress and egress as determined by the City Traffic
Engineer. The project will include stop sign controls at Moss and Naples and attendant
warning devices as deemed necessary by the City Traffic Engineer. A stop sign will be
installed on Naples at Moss Street, to create a three-way stop controlled intersection. These
traffic measures enhance traffic safety and provide more efficient flow of traffic within this
area adjacent to the project. The street improvements would require an increase in City
right-of-way in accordance with City of Chula Vista street design standards, by the property
owner of the proposed project. These street improvements will address the traffic concerns
of residents and improve traffic circulation in the project area. The proposed project is a
street vacation and will not create any impact on public services. The Fire Department and
Police Department have not noted any Fire or Police protection in relation to this project.
The project site may be developed in the future as single-family housing. This possible
development will be no more than 5 parcels and the population increase will not place a
significant impact on public services in the project area.
ICHECKLST.MOS
Ij,;2J5
Page 6
15.
Energy. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Use of substantial amount of fuel or
energy?
D
D
.
b
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources or energy, or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
D
D
.
Comments :
The proposed project will not involve any energy use and will not create any energy
demands.
16.
Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards?
YES MAYBE NO
D D .
Comments:
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seven
Threshold Standards.
A. Fire/EMS
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond
to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in
75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard
will be met, since the nearest fire station is 1-1/4 miles away and would be associated
with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard.
Fire Department access is not compromised and use of existing fire hydrant is not
compromised.
B. Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84 % of Priority
1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority
1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority
2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
C. Traffic
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D"
may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections.
Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No
intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour.
Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
ICHECKLST.MOS
II - ;2. J j,
Page 7
The proposed project intersection is currently at level of service "A" and will remain
at "A" after the project is completed.
D. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l ,000 population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
The proposed project will not significantly impact storm water flows and is consistent
with the Drainage Master Plan.
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed
project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
The proposed Moss Street vacation will not have a significant impact on sewage
volumes and is consistent with Sewer Master Plan.
G. Water
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee
off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit
issuance.
The proposed project will not jeopardize water quality standards because future
construction will not be significant.
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health? 0 0 .
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? 0 0 .
\CHECKLST .MOS
//--..2J7
Page 8
11
I
Comments:
The proposed project will not create any significant health hazard. The traffic shift will not
create any health hazards due to its close proximity to the Moss Street vacation.
18.
The additional few homes that may be developed on the site in the future will be aesthetically
more pleasing than the public street that currently exists on site.
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
The obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view?
o
.
o
b.
The destruction, or modification of a scenic route?
o
.
o
Comments:
The Moss Street vacation will not allow for the possible development of no more than five
units in the site.
19.
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The proposed project will not significantly impact recreational opportunities. Parks and
Recreation did not note any concerns.
20.
CuhuralResources.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction or a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
o
o
.
b
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building, structure,
or object?
o
o
.
c.
Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
o
.
o
d.
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
o
o
.
e.
Is the area identified on the City's
General Plan EIR as an area of high
potential for archeological resources?
o
o
.
ICHECKLST.MOS
/1-..2;Y
Page 9
-z;i
Comments:
The proposed project is in an urbanized area of the City and will not impact any cultural
resources.
21.
Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of paleontological
resources?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
The proposed project site is in an urbanized area and will not result in the determination of
paleontological resources.
22.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
animal or eliminate important examples or the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
D
D
.
Comments:
The proposed project, the vacation of Moss Street does not have the potential to degrade or
reduce any existing habitat as the project consists of the closing of a street and has, therefore,
been denuded of any habitat long ago.
Comments:
b
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs in
a relatively brief, definitive period of time,
while long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
D
.
D
The City Traffic Engineer has found that the requested vacation, along with the
recommended conditions of approval, would meet the General Plan Circulation Element street
standards, and would enhance traffic safety by eliminating the acute angle at which Moss
Street now intersects with Naples Street. The Circulation Element diagram shows Moss
Street intersecting with Naples Street near First Avenue and/or Alpine Avenue and thus the
proposed configuration would be consistent with the General Plan. The project complies with
long-term environmental and land use goals of the City.
c. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact two or
ICHECKLST .MOS
Page 10
/I-J-Ji
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
D
D
.
Comments:
This project does not have the potential to be individually limited but cumulatively
considerable. The main concern raised by residents was in regard to traffic flow. The traffic
engineers who reviewed the project have determined that the inclusion of: stop signs on
Naples at Moss Street to create a three-way stop controlled intersection and provision of a
52' roadway which will be an expansion from the existing 20' roadway will enhance traffic
safety and provide a more efficient flow of traffic within this area. The street improvements
will improve circulation and safety at the intersection of Moss Street and Naples Street and
will address the traffic concerns of residents. Staff are confident that based on this
determination, the project does not have cumulatively considerable impacts.
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
D
D
.
Comments:
The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings either
directly or indirectly as it must meet all Code requirements and requirements of various City
departments.
))'eJ'it?
Page 11
ICHECKLST.MOS
. ,.
APPLICA nON CANNOT.I.. ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-lf]. X 11 FOLDER
A. BACKGROUND
1. Project Title Vacation of a nortion of Mn~~ ~~rpP
2. Project Location (Street address or description)
MossStreet between Naples Street andrlA1pine
INITIAL STUDY
~~O:~~~~JI.'
.DpSl Amnl, . ()/J
Receipt No. .
Date RcC'd;'
AtceptedllY .
Project No. FA-
DIiSl No. J)Q-tJ3
.OPNo./"" .'
ReJa.edCaseNo.
";,,,,::";:;"~
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
Avenue
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. Legal -description attached
3. Brief Project Description Vacation of a portion ofilMoss Street
between Naples Street and A1p1ne Avenue
4. Name of Applicant San Dieao Country Club and Cnuni"ry Clnh vil'1itates
Address 250 Bonita Glen Drive Fax# --- Phone ---
City Ctiula Vista State CA Zip 91910
5. Name of Preparer/Agent Greg Cox
Address 3130 Bonita Rd, Suite 200 Fax# 691-9854 Phone 585-7007
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91910-3263
Relation to Applicant Consultant
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
_ Rewne/Prezone
_ Grading Permit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative SuM Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
_ Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
~ Other Permit
Street vacation
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rewne, please indicate the change in designation from
Not annl i ~Rh] po to
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
wrc,p,'H<lMIl\PU.NNING\5TOREDI1021.A.93 (W. 1020.93) (Rd. 102293)
_ Grading Plan
Parcel Map
- Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic Impact Report
Hazardous Waste Assessment
Arch. Elevations
= Landscape Plans
_ Tentative SuM Map
_ Improvement Plans
_ Soils Report
_ Geotechnical Report
_ Hydrological Study
Biological Study
= Archaeological Study
Noise Assessment
- Other Agency Permit
x Other Si te plan
//-:2Yl
,
Pagel
'Jf
t- ,
r
. ,
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use. not applicable
a. Type(s) of land use
b. Floor area Height of sttuctures(s)
c. Type of construction used in the structure
1.
2.
a.
approx. .30 800
Land Area: square footage ' or acreage
If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose.
purposes.
Tn.,.. pnhl;'" Tr"'\~d/
City of Chula Vista Dresently h~~ ~n ~~~~m~nT
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or will existing structure be.
utilized? fJO
Complete this section if project is residential or mixed use. not applicable
a. Type of development:_ Single Family _ Two Family _ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium
Total number of sttuctures
Maximum height of structures
Number of Units: 1 bedroom
2 bedroom
3 bedroom
4 bedroom
Total Units
Gross density (DUttotal acres)
Net density (DUttotal acres minus any dedication)
Estimated project population
Estimated sale or rental price range
Square footage of structure
Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
Percent of site in road and paved surface
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
1.
d. Describe major access points to the sttuctures and the orientation to adjoining properties
and streets
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
1/- ;22J:A
PageZ
WPC:F:~G\n'0RED\I021.A.93 (ReI. 1020.93) (ReI. 10n.93)
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
k. Hours of operation
1. Type of exterior lighting
4. H project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section.
a. Type of project Street vacation
b. Type of facilities provided none
c. Square feet of enclosed structures n/ a
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum n/a
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project n/ a
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided n/a
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces existina asohalt will he removed
h. Additional project characteristics
proiect will result in th~ TPmoval of ~pprnY;m~r~ly
30,800 square feet of asphalt.
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. Will the project be required to obtain a permit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)?
No
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated? Not at thi s time
H yes, complete the following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled. how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the: Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
Average depth of fill
.
wpc'p'\HOMEII'I.ANNINCMTOIlEI:N021.".93 (Ref. 102D.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
) /-.:2rJ
Page 3
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are pan of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.)
None
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is pan of the project (sq. ft. or acres)
None
5. If the project will result in any employment opponunities describe the nature and type of these
jo~. Temporary construction jobs for public improvements
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within
the project site? No
7. How many estimated automobile trips. per day, will be generated by the project?
Auto trios will be eliminat~d nn pnT~;nn or MnQQ ~~r~~+ +n
be vacated.
8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of
access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following:
new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and flll slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
See attached.
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1.
Geology
Has a geology study been conducted on the propeny?
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils repon on the project site been made?
(If yes, please attach)
No
No
2. Hvdrology
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? "'n
(If yes, explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? Ill...
WJ>Co.r.~Oll.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 10ll.93)
JI',) '1y
Page 4
.
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
No
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply,
lake, reservoir or bay? No
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas?
No
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. None vet
3. ~
a. Are there any noise sources in the project .vicinity which may impact the project site?
No
b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? Possibly
4. Biologv
a. Doe~ the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? No
c. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes No X (Please attach a copy.)
d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and
species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project.
Site is currently an existing road. It has been
covered with agph~l~ fnr YP~TQ
5. Past Use of the Land
a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? No
b. Are there any known paleontological resources? No
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
No
d. What was the land previously used for? Presentlv used as a pnhli,., rn"d.
/ /-;2 1,/3
wpc:F:\HOMIN'LAllNINGlST0REI7I1021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1=93)
Page 5
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site.
Asphalt
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property.
North Golf course
South Sinale family dwellinas
East Neighborhood sh9Pping
West Single family dwellings
7. fu1llil
a. Are there any residents on site? No If so, how many?
b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? No
If so, how many and what type?
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project.
Vacation of this portion of Moss Street will
eliminate the dangerous and awkward traffic
intersection at Moss Street and Naples Street.
Traffic circulation will hp ;mpTnv~n
//-02(1
WPC:F:\IIOMlN'1.AIOONG\STClIlEIl\1021.A.!n (Rd. I020.!n) (Rd. 1022.!n)
Page 6
E. CERTIFICA nON
I, as owner/owner in escrow*
Print name
or
I, consultant or agent*
Gregory R. Cox
Print name
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all
respects true and correct and that all1cnown information concerning the project and its setting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
,
..
Owner/Owner in Escrow Signature
or
Consultant
August 2, 1993
Date
*If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
J h}J/ 7
wpc:F:\IIOME\I'UNNIN~021.A.93 (Rd. 1020.93) (Rd. lo:l2.93)
Page 7"
cjJ
Response to Question No.8
Initial Study
Vacation of a portion of Moss Street
In consideration of the San Diego County Club (SDCC) deeding over any
reversionary interest that the SDCC may have in the portion of Moss Street to be
vacated, Country Club Villa Estates has agreed to install all missing curbs,
gutters, streetlights and necessary asphalt on the SDCC property between Third
Avenue and where the realigned portion of Moss Street will intersect with Naples
Street. These improvements will be installed within three years of the date of
transfer of the property from SDCC to County Club Villa Estates. A Request for
Waiver has been submitted simultaneously with the Request for Right of Way
Vacation to relieve the SDCC from any future requirement to install sidewalks on
the above referenced portion of Moss Street, as long as the SDCC continues to
operate as a golf course. The Request for Waiver is an integral part of the Request
for Right of Way Vacation. When plans are submitted for future development of
the enlarged parcel which would be created by the approval of the requested
vacation, it is anticipated that full street improvements would be required as a
condition of approval.
11-.J/0/--t5d-
" i
'1'
nm c. .I OF CHULA VISTA DISa..DSURE 5'", .'E.MENr
You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign
contributions, on all mailers which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
I. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the propeny which is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contraclOr, subcontractor, material supplier.
COUNTRY CLUB VILLA ESTATES
Stephen V. Ferreira
Gregory R. Cox
Nita V. Ferreira
Phillip P ~~rrp;r~
2 If any person" identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
COUNTRY CLUB VILLA ESTATES
Stephen V. Ferreira
Gregory R. Cox
Nita V. Ferreira
Phillip P. Ferreira
3. If any person" identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trusL
N/A
4. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Commillees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No...!... If yes, please indicate person{s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors wbo
you have assigned to represent you before the City in this mailer.
GREGORY R. COX
JAMES ALGERT
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggrTte, lXlntributed more than SI,OOO to a Councilmember in tbe
current or preceding election period? Yes_ No_ If yes, state whicb Councilmember{s):
. . · (NOlE: Anacb additional palCS Z D
1. .. .
Date:
JULY 1, 1993
Si
GREGORY R. COX, CONSULTANT
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
COUNTRY CLUB VILLA ESTATES
. Pmon isdefl1wJtzr "Anyindh~finn. co-~,joinrw:n.lW'l; urcr:tfftM, 60eUIJ dub, fri1u;m4J ....6- :.-:-a, urrporlUion, aI4IC, IrWr, rca:Mr, ~
this 11nd any IIIio<r COtDII)~ city IlNi ccxuu>)~ cit)" municip<>1it:,~ dUtria, '" IIIio<r po/iIic4J.1A4bdivUicm, '" any IIIio<r I"""P '" e<>mbimuiDn IICIing lIS . unit..
/)~ ;2r!i
1liE CITY OF CHUI...A VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEME.!'\'T
You are. required to file a Statem. of Disclosure of cenain ownership or mcial interests, payments, or campai~n
cOntributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the pan of the City Council, Plannin~ Commission, and
all other official bodies. The followin~ infonnation must be disclosed:
I. List the names of all persons havin~ a financial interest in the propeny which is the subject of the application or the
conlract, e.~., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
COUNTRY CLUB VILLA ESTATES
Stephen V. Ferreira
Nita V. Ferreira
Gregory R. Cox
Phillip P. Ferreira
2. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or pannership, list the names of all individuals ownin~
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or ownin~ any pannership interest in the pannership.
COUNTRY CLUB VILLA ESTATES
'Stephen V. Ferreira
Nit;:! V Fprrpir;\
GreQorv R. Cox
Phillip P Fprrpir~
3. If any person" idenlified pursuanl to (1) above is non.profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit or~anization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trusL
NIl>.
4. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past rwelve months? Yes_ N02 !fyes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independenl contractors who
you have l\Ssi~ned to represent you before the City in this ;~.atter. '
GREGORY R. COX
JAMES ALGERT
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, lXlDtributed more than $1,000 to a CounciJmember in tbe
current or preccdin~ election period? Yes_ No-K If yes, state wbich CounciJmember(s):
. . . (NO'IE: Attach additional pages as necessary) . . .
Date:
JULY 1, 1993
~
of contraClor/applicant
NITA V. FERREIRA
Print or l)'Pe name of contractor/applicant
. ~ is defuld tu: "An)' WJj\<it.luaI. ftnr.. Co-~PI jow '''CI1lW''C, AS:3'ocf"".o.... StXW club, frDJJ:J'ntJl Do 'fill :......,;....'\ corporllZio1l, CSUZll; InLU, ru:cilo'CT, zyn4iC4U,
v.iJ and an)' o:her CDW1J)~ cu,. and COWUl)~ elt)' ~j disrricz. or other polilicDl IUbdi.Uion., or anj' other 1f01.lp or combUt.arion <<ling AS {J &&ni:."
/ j- J.5"1?
niE -y OF 0iUl.A VISTA DISCLOSURE ~ lTI::MENT
You are required to file a Sl8tement or Disclosure or cenain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campai&n
contributions, on all mallers which will require discretionary action on the pan or the City Council, Planning Commission, and
all other official bodies. The following inrormation must be disclosed:
]. List the names or all persons having a financial interest in the propeny which is the subject or the application or the
contract, e.g., O\\'Iler, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
SAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUB
2. lC any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or pannership, list the Dames or all individuals o\\'Iling
more than 10% or the shares in tbe corporation or o\\'Iling any pannership interest in the pannership.
N/A
3. lC any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the Dames or any person
serving as director or the Don-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor or the trusL
N/A
4. Have you had more than S250 wonh or business transacted with any member or the City S1aff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No2,lCyes, please indicate person(s):
,
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors who
you have assigned to represent you berore the City in this maller.
GREGORY R. COX
JAMES ALGERT
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmemher in the
current or preceding election period? Yes_ No-X If yes, state which Couilci1member(s):
· · · (Nom
Attach additional pap as Dea:swy) . .. ~
~'\A.1 L Cu.,,'
(;, Signature or ntractor/applicant
LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM, PRESIDENT
Date:
JULY 1. 1993
Print or type name or contractor/applicant
. Paron is defined tu: "An)'indh~firm, eo.parrnenhip,joiNWMUC, tIS:'Y:"":^"\.ociDJ d&mJfrtlllm41-o4L ;.......-; corpomzi~ azmt, ~ rr:edYf:r, ~
rhis -;;;d >Df)' o:ha <ounI); ciI)'lInt! <""""", ciI)' municipolU)', dmc~ Dr o:ha po/ili<tI! adodi.inon, Dr >Df)' o:ha _ Dr combirwion octing as . unit .
/ /~ ..25"'1
STATEMENT OF AUTHORIZATION
I, Stephen P. Oggel, declare as follows:
1. I am an attorney at law and a principal in the firm of
Friedman, Jay & Cramer. I represent San Diego Country Club
("the Club").
2. The Club has been working with Greg Cox of Cox &
Associates in an effort to transfer the Club's reversionary
rights to land beneath Moss Street to clients of Mr. Cox. In
exchange for that transfer, the Club is to receive
consideration in the form of the assumption of the Club/s
responsibilities to make certain street improvements along
Moss Street.
3. It has become necessary to complete forms and take
other administrative and administerial actions with the City
of Chula Vista to accomplish the purposes described in
paragraph 2 above. In order to accomplish those purposes, I
hereby delegat~ to Greg Cox the authority to deal for and on
behalf of the Club in all such transact~~ns
Dated: June 25, 1993
I
St hen P. Oggel
) /';25,2
",1 ~ ~ '~ I
\. o.e60
~o. G\.u& ~ ~
SITE 0
~"T -.:,
NI'f'\.ES 51 SCALE: ,"=100'
-
III ~
~
VICINITY MAP MAP 1\12: !:P5
(N.S) 15
, ..
LEGEND:
F,~~~:..'J.;1 - 51REET VACATION
PAPCEL Nez. 1. -0.Z8 k...
V III! II ,... 5 i~EET vACA1"'ON
PARCEL NQ.. Z -0.44Ac:..
(Dt~o::>- zz
MAP ~2:
1i5Z-
N40~'5f>UE
40.00'
I
P~EPARED BY:
ALGERT ENGINEERING. INC.
4z.8 BROADWAY
CI4ULA VISiA, CA. "'ZOIO
(G.19) 420 - .,00.0
//~d.?
CITY OF c:.~ULA VISiA
5T~EET VACATION: MOSS ST~E"ET -I3ElWEEN ALPINE AVE 8< i ~ AVE
SAMES I-l.A\..GE1":T, RCE" 1901~
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
FOR
THE VACATION OF MOSS STREET
BETWEEN ALPINE AVENUE AND NAPLES STREET
PARCEL 1 AND 2
PARCEL 1:
A PORTION OF LOT 15 IN QUARTER SECTION 120 OF CHULA VISTA, IN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO.505, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 13, 1888, DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOW":
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ROBINHOOD SUBDIVISION NO.
2, ACCORDING TO Y~P NO. 3488, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING ;~SO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF MOSS STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 2,740
FOOT RADIUS CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 4047'51" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 2,740 FEET FROM SAID CORNER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID ARC, A DISTANCE OF 32.59 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING J>~ONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, A
DISTANCE OF 383.63 FEET TOA POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF NAPLES STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIXTH STREET, AS
SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 505, SAID POINT HAVING A RADIAL LINE WHICH
BEARS NORTH 30 54' 21" WEST; THENCE SOUTH 71"23' WEST ALONG SAID
NORTH LINE OF NAPLES STREET, A DISTANCE OF 143.80 FEET TO A POINT
ON THE ARC OF A 2,780 FOOT RADIUS CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS
NORTH 1"02'17" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,780 FEET FROM SAID POINT;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE, THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 4 048' 39", A DISTANCE OF 2 3 3 . 4 2 FEET; THENCE NORTH
18031' WEST, 43.2" FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
PAGE 1 OF 2
J/,)-~f
,
PARCEL 2:
A PORTION OF LOT 15 IN QUARTER SECTION 120 OF CHULA VISTA, IN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 505, FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF SAID SAN DIEGO COUNTY, MARCH 13, 1888.
TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE WESTERLY HALF OF FIFTH AVENUE, AS
VACATED, ADJOINING SAID LOT 15 ON THE EAST, DESCRIBED AS A WHOLE AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF ROBINHOOD SUBDIVISION NO.
2, ACCORDING TO MAP NO. 3488, ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING ALSO A POINT ON THE
CENTER LINE OF MOSS STREET, SAID POINT BEING ON THE ARC OF A 2,740
FOOT RADIUS CIRCLE, THE CENTER OF WHICH BEARS NORTH 4047'51" EAST,
A DISTANCE OF 2,740 FEET FROM SAID CORNER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
ALONG SAID ALONG SAID ARC, A DISTANCE OF 32.59 FEET TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CIRCLE,
A DISTANCE OF 383.63 FEET TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHERLY LINE OF NAPLES STREET, FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIXTH STREET, AS
SHOWN ON SAID MAP NO. 505, SAID POINT HAVING A RADIAL LINE WHICH
BEARS NORTH 3054'21" WEST; THENCE NORTH 71023' EAST J>.LONG SAID
NORTH LINE OF NAPLES STREET, 179.5 FEET TO A POINT IN THE ARC OF A
2,700 FOOT RADIUS CURVE, CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY, CONCENTRIC WITH
SAID 2,740 FOOT RADIUS CURVE; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID 2,700
FOOT RADIUS CURVE TO A RADIAL LINE OF SAID 2,740 FOOT RADIUS CURVE
BEARING NORTHEASTERLY FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID RADIAL LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING ANY PORTION LYING EASTERLY OF THE CENTER LINE OF SAID
VACATED FIFTH AVENUE ADJOINING LOT 15 ON THE EAST.
f.
PAGE 2 OF 2
);'.255
r'O r'U
00' ~
~
h
-0
r-
rT1
(J)
",<:'0 '
(J)
o.
I _,
-'00'
1:>
It.
@. ALPINE AVE.
It.
D D D
::c ::c rn
rn rn ><
<:: <::
rn rn con
::c ::c ::::!
con con :z::
C> C> C>
(J) :z:: :z::
-0
-t --I --I >
::tl C> C> ::c
rT1 > C?
con rn
rT1 = = r-
-t C? "-
C? C>
:z::
:z::
- C>
FIRST AVE. -0
Cl:l >
c. ::c
C?
rn
r-
....
80'
J j->>~
APPENDIX III
CITY DATA SHEET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE NO. IS 91-01
I. Current Zonine on site: R- I Sinele-Familv Residential
North Public & Ouasi Public
South R- I Sinde-Familv Residential
East CN-Retail Commercial
West R- I Sinele-Familv Residential
Does the project conform to the current zoning? Yes
II. General Plan land use designation on site: Sinele-Familv Residential
North Public & Ouasi Public
South Sinele-Familv Residential
East Retail Commercial
West Sinele-Familv Residential
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? Yes. The Citv Traffic Eneineer has
found that the reauested vacation. alone with the recommended conditions of aooroval. would meet the
General Plan Circulation Element street standards. and would enhance traffic safetv bv eliminatiDe the acute
anele at which Moss Street now intersects with Naoles Street. The Circulation Element diaeram shows Moss
Street intersectine with Naoles Street near First A venue and/or Aloine A venue and thus the orooosed
confieuration would be consistent with the General Plan.
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? No.
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? No
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route). _
III. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Not Applicable
School
Caoacitv
Enrollment
Units
Prooosed
Generating
Factors
Students
Generated From
Proiect
Elementary
Junior High
Senior High
.30
.29
.10
IV Remarks: The General Plan Land Use Element would not be affected bv the street vacation. The General Plan
oresenllv desil!Ilates the orooertv as Low-Medium Densitv Residential (3-6 du/ac). and the orooeflv is zoned R-I
(Single Familv Residential. 7.000 sa. ft. minimum lot size). The additional develooable acreaee created bv the
vacation could only be develooed in accordance with the Dresen! General Plan desienation and zonim!.
Jc~. 0)'7. /79tY
Date '
J j- J-->'7
/
'(s - os-
"
Case No. IS- 9'1-01
G. I~GINEERING nEeARTHENT
1. Drainaae
a.
Is the project stte wtthtn a flood platn? IV()
If so, state whtch FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary oN/A
b.
What is t~e locatton and
drain~ faciltttes? ~/~
!;Jldt"/ "I' II" R() n A.,..
descrtptton of extsting on-stte
DRA/~Ac-.- F'/Of1v$ /0 .J/'<-
.
c. Are they adequate to serve the project? ~F$
If not, explain brtefly.
d. What ts the location and description of extsttng off-stte
dratnage facn itte~? -"JON e..
.
e. Are they adequate to serve the project? oN/14
If not, explatn briefly.
2. TranSDortat1on
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? ~oss
S77f ....-,-
b. What ts the esttmated number of one-way auto trtps to be
generated by th~ project (per day)? A/ / A
,.
c. What is the ADT and esttmated level of servtce before and after
project completion?
Before After
~A.O.T. ~,(J!:D oN/A
L.O.S. A A
If the A;O. T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explatn
briefly. . oN //*0
d.
Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explatn brtefly. <</.f1
-
WPC 1459P
-14-
JJ-:J.5(
,"
Case No. ;rs- 9~"ol
e. Are there any intersections at or near the point that will
result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)?
If so, identify: Location ~/A
Cumulative L.O.S.
Is there any dedication required? N/A
If so, please specify.
f.
g.
Is there any street widening required? A/ / A
If so, please specify. .
h.
Are there any other street illlprovements required? ~/ A
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
improvements.
3. Soil s IJ ;" . .
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the ,
project site?
b. If yes, speCify these conditions.
c. Is a soils report necess)ry?
4. Land Form
a. What is the average natural slope of the site? ;Z /.
b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? "3/,
5. "01 se AI/A
Are there any traffic-relate,d noise levels 1l1lpacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant?
I. Waste Generation ~/A
How lIuch solid and liquid (sewage) waste win be generated by the
proposed project per day?
Sol id
liou1d
What is the locatfon and size of exfstfng sewer lfnes on or
downstream from the site?
__ Are they adequate to serve the proposed project?
WPC Sl459P
-15-
1/~.2S7
Case No.:rs- 9'1'01
7. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts,
mitigation Masur.s, or other bsues. #/11
o.Jb.b~
.
-
WPC 9459P
-16-
/h).!,O
ROUTING FORM
DATE: August 11, 1993
TO; Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cli~~ SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudol~, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
CUrrent Planning
aordon Howard, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Eleme.ptary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
,
Environmental section
FROM:
Barbara Reid
SUBJECT: Application ~or Initial Study (IS- 94-01lFA- 632 /DQ 031 J
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ J
Review o~ a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record FC- ERR-_)
The Project consists of: Vacation of a 30,800 sq. ft. portion of Moss
Street between Alpine Ave. and First Ave.
and ~orward to me any comments you have
~&. @/8
C-2,
~~
Location: Moss Street between Alpine Ave. and First Ave.
Please review the document
by 8/25/93 .
Comments:
Cf(r,P- (~ RS.~~ ~,J(.
~ ~U~cQ W--~~
T(C:L~ ~vQ.Qr
J/~ 24- /
7\
\OV
.
. ,
.
,
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
August 11, 1993
~
F ren..'b
Ken Larson, Building .,. Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (ISI3, EIRI2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks .,. Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (H.J. Diosdado)
CUrrent Planning
Gordon Howard, Advance Planning
Bob sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS'" EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
#lJlOJI, 7D S
~rbara Rei~
~
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 94-0~FA-~/DQ 031 J
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_IFB-_IDQ J
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _IFB- _IDP )
Review of Environmental Review Record FC-_ERR-_)
The Project consists of: Vacation of a 30,800 sq. ft. portion of Moss
Street between Alpine Ave. and First Ave.
Location: Moss Street between Alpine Ave. and First Ave.
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 8/25/93
Comments:
'1'\&- ~ OA.. ~ QA..::d.,... A dbfJ4~j....u. ~
~ ~ f:-u- ~ .i.o./a.-u- ~~
1~1 \(g-ao5.
/ ) -;2(,;2-.
. .
LEnER OF TRANSMl'n...L
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA. CAUFORNIA 92012
(819)420-1413
L
.;:
'-
Date:
c::3, '" f' -\-
7 19'93
.
To:. M~. \:)"'''~\~, G?..~,Q
C.:\'7""'c::;, ('.L>\~V"\L
~--_." -~ '):).....~.
,..,e,. ~\J""~ Au.
c.\..,,\.. V:s.~. ~"" "',ClIO
,
Ref: ~"5>.- q,-<- C 1
Gentlemen:
We are forwarding:
~Mail
CJ By Delivery
CJ By Pick-Up
CJ By Hand
No. of Copies
Originals
Description:
I
"'S.u JA
I Q.. ~-4! r .Q..... "' a&
-,/7...........(<:13,
The above is sent to you for: CJ Action ~Requeste'd
CJ Review
CJ Comments
CJ Checking
Comments:
o Please send location and size of your existing and proposed facilities.
o Please re-submit copies of revised prints for checking.
o Please re-submit copies rA revised prints and one original for checking and signature.
~ 'r''-lI.... u..\....Q r..,.~bca....b.J..., ~~"D~ 'i-a-~, \.s..:lf...r-
L""1 +t.._ E-._->:_e."-~,-~ JS"r~.
o Approval
~mation
CJ Revision
CJ Other
U;:;;OJ;2/ a.tlL-
J/~:<t:J
Received by:
Date:
12/1983
... .. ~- ..
,
'" ~WEETWATER AUTHORI.
-~
1
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 9'9'2-2328
(6'9) .20-'.'3
FAX (619) .25-7.e9
~1lOAIIl>
SUE JAMETT. CfoWAMAN
a.o POCKUNGTON. \lICE CHAlAMN4
EDWIN J. STEELE
GEORGE M. WATERS
~ET A. WELSH
.-.s s. WOLNIEWICZ
CMYF.WRGH1'
_IW!1<Y
,.,... ..,.
July 22, 1993
DAN J. REEVES
IICRETMY.~TMNDE
Mr. John Hardesty
City of Chula Vista
Engineering Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
Subject: PROPOSED VACATION OF A PORTION OF MOSS STREET
AT NAPLES STREET
SWA Gen. File: Vacations (Street, Alley, Right-of-way)
Dear Mr. Hardesty:
This letter is in response to your notice of a proposed vacation of
a portion of Moss Street at Naples Street. Sweetwater Authority
presently has a 30-inch steel water main located on the north side
of Moss Street in this area. This is a major transmission facility
for conveying water in the City of Chula Vista.
The Authority requests that the above-described water facilities be
exempted from this vacation. We request that a 20-foot wide
permanent easement centered on the main be granted to us for the
purpose of installing, operating, maintaining, replacing and
repairing said facilities and service pipes and the right of
ingress and egress for such purposes. Also, no buildings and/or
stru'ctures will be" .erected, walls constructed, fences built,
changes of grade, nor trees planted upon the area of the easement.
Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 120 map which show these facilities.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at
420-1413, ext. 239.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
~.~m~A
~~t~gLChief Engineer
k:\lorelel\wp5'\mOSs.ltr
enclosure:
photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 120 map
pc: Russ Collins, Sweetwater Authority ) 1-"< ?~/
A Public Agent:y,
Servif16 NotioltlJl City, cnulo Visto ond Surroundin, Amls
.
~. " ~, . ~
: : ...= t. J
. =!!:~.'II =: I - t /
~~ I I I I -'WO'" CA. ~_"l.._~ --""\ ~A. ~
I ?~ ~~~ &000....'=......_ wo~!,.... 'T'=-~ .-......-..0 ;\ ~ 0= ~ //
~, " N ::;';: ~E. ~ ~ ,,1 ~ ~, ~ i i ~. g \'....~ \. ~ l. ~~. ~---------,
~ .! · ~ ji i ! f t s r pH" e \ I:'" ;\.~le ./),;;l ~ ~~~' ~
I ~ & ~ '... ~ lIt,; ~r O=~~;f" t.,O
- ~ I;;;: 'A' .. - - ~ I...."~ .4 t.,
I~ ~. I". '0 :: ~ ;:;;~~eY~ 'if.
~~ if . i iii' WI- iT \~ ", ' ,l t.,
Ii, t 0;1'71. e ::-7 'I'. ; \ \ ~~rj.'J
!g-Il ; : ~ \JII:': I d :'h'll' J elt On ,:,,," Q ,,/
I ~ l! ... . I:.~ .' ''''(11- l:
".. :. I.... ,'c JLfoo~lo",-l. ,.J.:;l,::.~~~tio1"""" ~1/4 :C N I c. 0
l ~I ~ . . ~~ ~--'."~:"Ilrc.g'" bl fi~'onZ a ~ ~ . (-
::,~ III ~ I 61 . ~ ~/'llIS_~_ J- ' Ii. -:'~... ,I ~<~--~t<'L
" ';' ifTI t b WPrk ng flaY$ P' ~O( ~~ . 133" ~~ ''I ,~ '\:;;'
I Il ~ !! I 'v E pee - ". ~ . ~ .. 'Ii
L c rr1- = M A.I= ,g,!>2 I..e.c ':~ -~ t: bt: If -- .:~:..
-:=-," ~ ~i: ~ .!" ~ ,11. .fl,E _L1 . ~^_,
:' ~ 10>' - ~.,.:. 1= II i' r- ~
, 0 0 r ~ ,-//
~i ~~! T i jI " B ! Iii ~ ;.:: I::' ~ ~ 'V
, -~ j) - ^' -_ 8! .. 5 ,
! j)~ S ~ _
....'1 ~ >NO ait.. I I I I
! Iii r 'R 15 S ~ ~ ~ I - ~.~.\;,.; "\,' '
I ~ . ':" II~:)~
;;;=@" t )>~rf""t_
'i'l ia - ::~,_
... I - ..- , I, 0
; I - E~ i i ! Il "". 1- rn Gi' ~
~ ~l' ,Vi' I ! I ~ I -- ~------~---~---------f--~ ------t----
II :.1,,' I '7.1 ~ fir'''' ::s..~ ~ iil I ~ ~--':~~-c; ~... _:~.::~~__________
~~ ~ I I ~ ! f! 12 g i I " ll_ q
r: e l;-,. ~ CJ) .o~
:-l ,...
~.d ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i I ~ . ~ ~ ~
"~~~ 1;;;';~~~":.'d.1J.= _05'_ I I I i it -lU {
..
,
. "
. .
~ .
d' _ ._' n -:--:-. .
0- r_~
-
t.
'""
!
........,:
---
'''',
"I
:~
-r
, .J.
~~l: f f ~ ~ '~f\~! I~ i ~ I
. '.
'. .
n-
"l "
!. : . .. ..
... I ..
.
.._~-~, -, jI:
- I J I I ~ I
i I I n~ I
. ,
..
) 1- ). (,5" .
-
,
.--. .:'-
~
--. -- ~--:' .~.
-- :r::... -". "'-.: _
""-':~ ~~.:- ~- . .:......0::.-
-..:;;;".: :.... ::~.:::.-
(
\ -~-
I
~ -
--2C'-9~; l.JED 10:"33 CHULA V I STA S-CHOOl_ n! ST'.
P.02
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPI-' 0 CUMMINGS Pi'I.D.
LARRY CUNN It~GHAM
~~ON GilES
PATR';;' A JUiJU
GREG ~ SAN:>QVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
U81~ S. GiL. Ph D
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTIUCT
84 EAST "J" STHEET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFOR."<IA ,1l.9lCo . 619 4~5.960il
- _~_.._n__ EACH CHILD IS A.~INjjiViDljAi~(W GREA'l;y,70R1;i,----- -.-
October 20 1993
Ms Barbara Reid
EnVIronmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Initial Study, Vacation of Portion of Moss Street
Dear Ms Reid
Thank you for providing the opportur;lty tor [t,e Dist' ict to cor ,lInent on tile
proposed vacalion of a portion of Moss Street
While there is no construction associated with t!-jis actIon should
residential units be proposed in the future for the approxm-,ateiy 30,800
square foot parcel, the additioral children not anlicipated lJased on the
proporty'c current Uill would exacerb8lc> alrF;=t,1y sp.r inwi sr.hnnl
overcrowding In the area.
It is requested thai approval of this apiJi1cak),1 b~ con.:;lItl;:;ne,j to require
future development to fully r:1ltigate impacts eon schoel facNies~
If yuu 'lave any questions, please call1'T1e
Sincerely,
~~ :>""-Q,~",
Kate Shurson
Director, Planning & Facilities
KSdp
cc Torn Silva
J a moss
} I - J, i.-k
_;...;:~_:~_ -c.;.....;.
.
Sweetwater Union High School District
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Aflh Avenue
Chuta VI.'a, California 91911-2896
(619) 891-5500
Division of Planning and Facilities
r --~ ...
- -..-".
A'f', -
I.J_.
AuguS112, 1993
p. ", ,
~t-'I ~I \,
Ms. Barbara Reid
Environmental Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
Envirollmenial Seaionl I'lailliing Dept.
276 Fourth Avenue
Chota Vista, CA 91911
Dear Ms. Reid:
Re: Moss St. Street Vacation: 1S-94-0I
The Sweetwater Union High School District does not object to the proposed vacation of that potion of
Moss Street between Alpine Avenue and First Street. Pursuant to our Director of Transportation,
eastbound and westbound buses will use Naples.
If you require any additional information, please do not hesitate to call me at 691-5553.
Thomas Silva
Assistant Director of Planning
/ / - ,).t 7
~~-.,....
''''''
Iv'.......
J'
Giroux eft A8S~...tes
Environmental Con~ ..;ants
mo ss
0.'. "
J. (..
MEMO
F~i'l\;l\' \-'--
TO:
Barbara Reid, City of Chula vista
FROM:
Hans Giroux; Giroux & Associates
RE:
Naples/Alpine Noise Monitoring
October 22, 1993
DATE:
In anticipation of possible changing traffic volumes at the Naples/
Alpine intersection in conjunction with proposed intersection
realignment, a baseline noise survey of existing conditions was
conducted on October 19-21, 1993. Measurements were made at 129
Naples at a location under the picture window facing Naples. Along
Alpine, noise was measured at a landscaping bush in front of 1094
Alpine near the lot line with 1098 Alpine. Larson-Davis Model 700
integrating sound level meters were used for these measurements
with the meters calibrated before and after the monitoring. The
meter records the sound level eight times per second, converts the
readings to an energy equivalent level (Leq), and stores the data
in an internal memory at preselected intervals. Hourly data were
used in this study.
Attachment A summarizes the results of around fifty hours of
measurements. Data from different days was almost identical.
Afternoon rush hour noise levels on three days were almost
identical at each location (within 1 dB at Naples and 1.5 dB at
Alpine). Throughout the day, from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., the noise
level was never lower than 64.0 dB or higher than 66.5 dB along
Naples on each day of measurements. As a rule of thumb, people do
not perceive a noticeable difference in noise exposure when levels
differ by less than 3 dB. There is therefore no noticeable
difference in traffic noise along Naples for around 13 hours of the
day.
A noise level of 65 dB is generally the threshold level where
speech interference becomes noticeable in that one has to raise
one's voice to overcome the traffic noise. Noise levels along
Naples at the closest point of residential occupancy are therefore
right at this threshold for most of the day.
/J~2?r(
/7744 Sky I'tIrk amk, Sui~ 2/0, JrviDe, QJjf~ 927/4 - PboDe (7/4) 8S/-8tf09 - FlU (7/4) 8S/-86/2
r
l
-2-
In order to account for changing noise sensitivity throughout the
day, noise/land use compatibility criteria use a descriptor called
the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). CNEL takes the hourly
noise levels, adds a 5 dB penalty for noise from 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.,
and a 10 dB penalty from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., and then averages the
24 hour period. CNELs were calculated for each of the days and
each of the sites monitored with the following result:
Date
129 NaDles
1094 Al Dine
10/19-20/93
10/20-21/93
65.9 dB(A)
66.4 dB(A)
57.8 dB(A)
57.8 dB(A)
The City standard at any exterior recreational use (patio, pool,
etc.) is 65 dB CNEL. Along Alpine, the standard is met with a wide
marqin of safety. Project-related changes in traffic volumes will
not cause the city standard to be exceeded. At the homes nearest
to the Naples/Alpine intersection, side yards or parts of the
backyard of several homes closest to the intersection are near the
standard. Because project implementation may incrementally
increase existing levels already at the recommended maximum, noise
protection for the yards of the homes nearest the intersection
should be considered. A 6-foot, side yard block wall would insure
that the project does not reduce the ability to comfortably use
exterior space at these homes.
Exterior noise increases may also impede the maintenance of an
acceptable interior level (normally 45 dB CNEL). structural
attenuation with closed windows is around 25 dB such that exterior
levels would need to exceed 70 dB CNEL before meeting interior
standards becomes impossible. As long as the closest homes have
the option to close their windowS to shut out street noise, meeting
the interior standard is not a problem. An ability to close
windows requires supplemental ventilation. We did not evaluate
floor plans and ventilation systems to determine whether any
structural modifications are necessary to insure that interior
levels are within the standard.
In summary, our findings were as follows:
1. Noise levels along Naples at the nearest point of residential
exterior use are at the city's standard.
/1' 2t 7
-3-
2. Any incremental increase due to the project can be offset by
a side yard wall at homes closest to the intersection.
3. Noise levels along Alpine are sufficiently low as to not be
impacted by project-related changes in traffic volumes.
4. Adequacy of interior noise protection should be evaluated.
JI-:27!J
ATTACHMENT A
IOISE IIlm'ORIIG RISllL!S
(Iourly levels in dBA LEQ)
129 Waples
1094 Alpine
10/19
10/20
10/21
10/19
10/20
10/21
00-01 50.0 54.5 46.0 48.5
01-02 49.0 49.5 45.5 46.5
02-03 43.5 48.0 41.5 44.5
03-04 44.5 47.5 45.5 44.5
04-05 47.0 47.0 45.0 45.5
05-06 56.5 56.0 50.5 50.5
06-07 61.0 62.5 54.0 54.0
07-08 65.0 65.0 56.5 59.0
08-09 65.5 65.5 56.0 56.0
09-10 64.0 64.0 56.5 53.5
10-11 64.0 64.5 53.0 55.5
11-12 65.5 65.0 55.0 56.5
12-13 65.0 65.0 53.5 53.5
13-14 65.5 66.0 61.5 56.0
14-15 65.5 65.5 56.5 54.5
15-16 66.0 66.0 55.5 55.0
16-17 66.5 66.0 58.0 55.0
17-18 66.5 66.5 66.5 55.0 57.0 56.0
18-19 65.5 65.5 66.5 55.5 55.5 57.0
19-20 64.0 64.5 53.5 54.5
20-21 63.0 64.0 52.5 53.5
21-22 62.5 63.0 52.5 53.0
22-23 59.5 58.0 50.0 51.0
23-24 54.5 57.5 49.5 49.0
//;,,27/
.
. .
.
,
Case No. /s-ql-Ol
APPENDIX IV
Comments
Received During the Public Review Period
_ No Comments Were Received During the Public Review Period
11~..2 ?c2
WPC,P,\IIOMlN'l.ANNlNG'STORED\1022.93 (Rot. 1021.93) (Rot. 1020.93)
t ^
"
August 27, 1993
Mr. and Mrs. Alan Willingham
122 Moss street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
John Goss-city Manager
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Goss:
We are writing this letter in reference to the planned project of
vacating a portion of Moss street between Alpine and First Avenues.
We understand that the site in question may be used for future
development of a few new home sites. We are delighted to learn
about this drastic improvement to the unsightly lot in our
neighborhood which becomes a dumping site at times for unwanted
household items. Most of all, this plan will eliminate the
dangerous intersection that causes a lot of traffic accidents on a
monthly basis. This intersection is going to cost someone their
life in the near future if something is not done about it. (If it
hasn't already)
We urge you to support this plan in behalf of the entire
neighborhood that uses this intersection on a daily basis. Thank
you for your understanding and time in regards to this matter. If
there is anything we can do to help this plan become a reality,
please contact us at 279-2042.
sincerely, .
~ U~~~
Alan willingham _
-~~~
Dottie Willingham
cc: Barbara Reid - Associate Planner
Jim Nater - Mayor
JrJ-73
AUG :: - 1993
.
tyr)y ,
Pf~~
t l ~",
i.t"..,y,-
,CITY MANAGER:
',t'UlA VISTA, "'_
!AUS 2.5 199:3,
,.. ," __ 0-
j - ---..
'.-- _. --- ~ .__.~.l
() 1:.. . 'I
-, "'I\..:VG
,
"
-',
Case No! 1s-94-01
Project Location! Moss Street between Alpine Ave. and First Ave.
Project Applicant! San Diego Country Club & Country Club Villa Estates
Environmental Review Coordinator
POBox 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912
Gentlemen!
Please recheck the traffic pattern of Moss Street and Naples Street.
The traffic on Moss Street has increased 100% in the last six years
that we have lived here, due to the fact iihat Naples is now a thnl
street to Medical Drive. Many people use Naples Street instead of
Telegraph Canyon and L Street.
Our small street of Alpine Ave in the 1000 block cannot handle all
the traffic from Moss Street. It is too narrow to start with and many
people do cross the empty lott instead of using the street.
On a Friday afternoon there are as many as eight cars at the stop sign
on Moss Street and First Ave. at one time and many do use Alpine to
get to Naples, which also has very heavy traffic at all times.
Since Chula Vista has grown so much in the last few years so has the
traffic.
Sincerely, _
(j /-tur ~ -6 a.t<.("t(~
&~a~
Albert C. Cabella &
Corinne A. Cabella
1098 Alpine Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91911-3301
~d>..(~ 11'l~
/ /-.271
ffiougust 24,1993
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
Att: Douglas D Reid
Dear Sir:
Air c
v /.. '.
Pi t.-' - ,
....,..,t"., ,
If\H\'...;:
We wish to comment on the initial study of the request for vacation
of a 30,000 sq. ft. portion of Moss St between Alpine and First Ave.
It just don't make sense to divert traffic to Alpine which would
affect First ~ve., a residentual neighborhood to accommodate a
Country Club. Our street is narrow with no sidewalks and since
Naples St. was opened up going East, we have been experiencing much
heavier traffic with speeding vehicles especially pick-ups.
What will happen to the trees along north side of Moss?
We have lived in our horee on First Avenue for thirty-nine years
and have seen many changes and noticed that the former owner of the
property mentioned above had tried to use or sell that land and was
turned down by the City. Then we heard the City of Chula Vista had
purchased the parcel and again a friend told us a former Mayor
was part owner now. Should we think this is political?
Thank you,
Aaron E. Cook
Margaret E. Cook
1160 First Ave.
Chula Vista, Ca. 91911
P.S. We are having difficulty with long waits at our stop on First
trying to get on Naples now.
//<27~
,
,
October 11, 1993
Chula Vista Planning Department
Public Services Building
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
I: .
J.
~
''-',....
~
'.
Re: Case # PCM-94-09/IS-94-01
Vacation of a 30,000
sq. foot portion of Moss
St. between Alpine and
Fest Aves.
To Whom It May Concern:
As residents at 1094 Alpine Avenue, in the area of the proposed
vacation of Moss Street, we hereby file the following protests,
with you, against this vacation:
1. Traffic on Moss and Naples from Broadway to Hilltop
Drive, and beyond, is quite heavy. Most of the time cars come
through these sections at high rates of speed. With the closing
of Moss Street there will be that much more traffic on Naples
Street. To say nothing of the increased traffic in front of our
residence.
2. Traffic at Moss where it intersects Naples is sometimes
backed up, going East, six to eight cars deep. Traffic will be
backed up trying to get onto Naples from Alpine many cars deep if
this proposed vacation is passed. The air quality caused by this
back up will be very extensive.
3. Alpine Avenue where all this traffic would have to
divert is only 20 feet wide at the present time' At the Safety
Commission Meeting it was conceded that this street will be
widened to accommodate the foreseen traffic.
4. Closing off Moss Street at Alpine would create a
"dogleg" of 90. which will be quite dangerous wi't:h the rate of
speed the cars traveling Moss Street are doing at present.
5. The corner of Moss Street where it intersects Naples is
not a dangerous corner (no accidents are attributed to this
corner), as shown at the Safety Commission hearing. This is the
reason given by the San Diego Country and Country Club Estates as
the reason for vacation. The danger will come when this vacation
occurs on Moss Street and traffic is diverted to Alpine Avenue.
///;2'76
The Safety Commission agreed that there would be a three way stop
erected at this intersection. The traffic on Naples is so heavy
that cars, even now, have problems moving onto Naples from either
the 1000 block or the 1100 block of Alpine. If this vacation
occurs the traffic on Naples could be doubled and the traffic
coming off of the 1100 block of Alpine Avenue will have the stop
heading North, turning onto Naples - then going West they will
have to stop once again, within 90 feet' THIS is a dangerous
situation to say nothing of the almost impossibility of moving
into the West bound traffic of Naples.
6. Speaking of dangerous - what about the dangerous
condition of elementary school children walking to school along
Naples Street on non-existant sidewalks with 12,000 cars, trucks,
buses, and ambulances a day speeding past, if this vacation
passes' They walk along there now with 6,000 cars, trucks,
buses, and ambulances (which is dangerous enough).
7. We recommend that a very THOROUGH study of the traffic
pattern in this area be made and also the cost to the city of
widening Alpine and installing the necessary stop signs (it
should be a stop light) at Alpine and Naples before any approval
is give to the closing of Moss Street between Alpine and First
Avenue. A recent automobile count was conducted at the 1100
block of Alpine. This count wasn't started until AFTER the
morning rush hour traffic had finished. How does this give an
accurate count? Please - have someone (a person or persons) come
out to this area and observe, for a few peak hours, to see the
traffic pattern as it REALLY is, at it's BEST!
8. Furthermore, as citizens, we are concerned with the
"waiver" which has been requested by the San Diego Country Club
and the Country Club Villa Estates that the curbing and sidewalks
along Moss Street from Third Avenue not be installed because of
hazards from the Golf Course. If a study were made it would show
that the "hazards" (golf balls) rarely fall along the fence -
they usually land in the street, in the lawns, in the empty lot,
or on the cars on the South side of Moss Street. I can show you
a recent broken window in my house caused by an errant golf ball'
9. As taxpayers we wonder what compensation the San Diego
Country Club and the Country Club Villa Estates plans to pay for
this 30,000 square foot piece of prime real estate (overlooking a
country club)? At today's prices this should be a nice "chunk of
change" to add to the City's coffers.
10. The Safety Commission Meeting of September 9, 1993
J/~;2 77
regarding this vacation of Moss Street was a joke. The
Commission did not listen to any of the many residents who came
to the meeting and voiced their concerns - There was no
discussion. They had already made up their minds. There were a
couple people on the Commission (Mr. Pitts and Ms. Braden) who
seemed to listen to our speeches and tried to get a dialog going
but Mr. Thomas, who was the Chair (and who seemed very bored with
the whole thing), was too busy having an aside discussion with
Mr. Padilla to pay any attention. He called for a vote of the
Commission without the least discussion of any of our concerns.
Is this the way our city of Chula Vista runs all of it's
hearings?
Thank you for this opportunity to voice OUR protests. Does it
REALLY do any good?
Sincerely,
Mr9rcf~e
Nflf/- 1Y?(~~
-Ml:. D. P. Cdughlan
1094 Alpine Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91911-3301
CC: Tim Nader, Mayor
Il'.J7Y
,..
August 23, 1993
I:J:I,
'"
Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
P. O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, California 91912
RE: Vacation of a 30,000 sq.
ft. portion of Moss St.
between Alpine and First
Avenues.
Dear Sir,
Thank you for your "Notice of Initial Study" letter of August 18,
1993.
As residents at 1094 Alpine Avenue and having read the complete
application for the Initial Study filed in the Planning
Department we hereby submit the following comments:
1. Our residece is located on the corner of Moss and Alpine
and therefore one of the two most affected households in regards
to this proposal of the vacation of the portion of Moss between
Alpine and First.
2. Traffic on Moss, all the
quite heavy. The portion of Moss
Avenu~ is probably the heaviest.
section at high rates of speed.
way from Broadway to Naples is
from Third Avenue to First
At times cars come through this
3. Traffic at Moss where it intersects Naples is sometimes
backed up, going East, five and six cars deep (usually at rush
hour). What will the back up be on Alpine if this section of
Mo$S is closed? I hate to think. The fumes from these cars will
certainly affect our standard of living on this section of
Alpine.
4. Alpine Avenue (in front of our dwellings) where all this
traffic would have to divert is only 20 feet wide! This is
hardly enough room for one car, let alone cars going in both
direction. Many times a car turning into this section of Alpine
from Naples would have to wait until the car leaving Alpine left!
This portion of Alpine would have to be widened to accommodate
the traffic which would be diverted.
5. Closing off Moss Street at Alpine would create a
"dogleg" and whatever the Country Club Villa Estates planned to
put up at this location would be in dire jeopardy. Perhaps a
solution to this would be to deadend Moss at Alpine and close off
this section of Alpine? Then we'd have different problems.
6. The corner of Moss Street where it intersects Naples is,
//-2//
indeed, a dangerous corner.
San Diego Country Club would
trimmed at this intersection
Looking right from this stop
the view is quite clear.
We are very aware of that. If the
continue to keep the high bushes
the danger is reduced considerably.
sign is a bit "neck stretching" but
7. If Moss Street is closed between Alpine and this
intersection the corner of Alpine and Naples WILL BE the MOST
dangerous corner in Chula Vista unless the city installed a three
way stop sign or light at this intersection. This would make it
safe and also make Alpine traffic accessible to Naples. The
traffic on Naples is so heavy that cars, even now, have problems
moving onto Naples from this section of Alpine.
We recommend that a very thorough study of the traffic pattern
in this area be made and also the cost to the city. of widening
Alpine and installing the necessary stop signs at Alpine and
Naples before any approval is give to the closing of Moss Street
between Alpine and First Avenue.
Thank you for keeping us informed in this matter.
Sincerely,
J~~~:~: ~~~~
--.
Mr. D. P. Coug lan
1094 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91911-3301
J) - ,;Ltrt/
. ~ . ' '.' ~~Q.-.~~
REC -0 v t::.U CITY MANAGER
~ W~ ~ ~~". :IIJIAVISTA,Oi
\J I. - 993 AUG 2 5 1993
~ . I'LANNiN" ~
__~...~..'. ffi ~:a~~ ~. :J~~f):-' ,t
_ ~ _~~J'bn~_ * ctl~.~ ~
_. F~Ol....t(...-W..Q.,..~_~,~KaJ~
._J..U)a>.AQ.... ~~
· , ~. ~.~~-tQu...-
~~<t,~~~... _~~~,t~
· :::.o~ ~~~~~-tQ..~
~~ . 4-'~" Q~..,Ny1.,...J-'L~~
~~ ~ak-~(..s..JJef)
~~..,,~~~~A.~~&~
IJ.X'J/ ~ W~ 1:;~.. ~.,.. .,,-J!JL.-,~_'
~ ~~-t::'Jo ~~OO
~~~r:~..f~~ - .
~~~V.jU ---. - - .
n;:.~~~&n"w;.:::a Qm
CP~~ u. ~. ~ ._._-1~-
.~L- ~~O~.~~-:o~~~~
~ ~cP 'f.5 ~ ~ -PcP ~. -'-..J
(~a~"'''-~ ~J ~~.t?~,}._""{J
~y~ ..~ .' ~~ ~if/
~. ~ ' adfJ--I/-.).6!
.
J
. . -
--
_ ~ /W' ~ 11.- '::-Ee. ~
,l>~ . ~..~.__.- -. ~ ~ti:..
~~ Ji,.f:rD::P~;~;;~
_ _ ~~+ ~(;-a&{)
1~ ~~:;;cQ~~~ ~d?
~.sf~.~ ~#~~.[)~~
* v.v~~,_~~~_
.~ ~~J..~~;" ;},!,f::~~~.i.~
~~.[)~ rr -:;0; ~ _
~~~dL Il ~~ ~
~ ~ ~.
_~ ..A1 e ~. Q.",,--, &. Il.-e ~ J' A 4---l
-_~, 4..), ~
- .. . ~ -P~.J. r
__~__m_. /JSf,~;~-~.? ~'L.-
. ... . ~~~7--."-i1.u~--
. ,
_. . ,V //-.;<g':2,
1081 KaA~t... ~i~~V~t~ ~~ll
1\
Q
t
,
~
- \
~ : I,'
::..;; l ~ ,~ " ~
~" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'!; V r i Ct i ..~ '- -{ ~ ~
'"" v I r...:r. ~ ;l <<~ "'"<:(
u ~ ~ ~:,c. ~ ~~~ r~
~ ~~ {~..- \., \." " '[;: ~=:J
l "l. ro '" "" ::: A ----. ___
6= <" ~ ~ g '" ' ~~
o 2 ~ ,""" ~__
- '" VI
~ 11 ~
J ~ ~. 0
~ ~ ~ ).~
~. ~ ~ J; ~ ~ ~ ra 0 ')
~ '.0
v '<.~ v') t)(~~);
'5'.0
t) 0 1
M~ \ ~ ~:O?J
I\, ,.....
6. ~ ~ ~ lrJ " ~ ~ ~ 'i0
() L '.lG "'''-I \9 Q\. f-~ ~CJ- ~~
f\( f ~ ~ ';' 00 ~ \I) I \ r-:-- I'\. ,
%:: l 1Il<;\ "I "" ) " ::: ;! '" . ~
~ t ~ ~~ ~ {~-":<-Q- ~~
~ 0 7'
~
~
,
))-,JX';J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /~
Meeting Date 11/1/94
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCM-94-20/PCA-94-02; Consideration of amendments
to the City Landscape Manual and associated amendments to the
Municipal Code - City initiated
Ordinance Amending Sections 17.10.050, 19 14.485, 19.14.030
and 19.14.486 of the Municipal Code relating to the revised landscape
manual and approval of landscape plans
Resolution Adopting the revised landscape manual of the City
of Chula Vista, superseding the State Model Code, and repealing Council
Policy Number 476-04
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Planning ~C\^
City Manager~ ~~\
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_No.lO
REVIEWED BY:
The Landscape Manual has been revised to include the water conservation measures called for
by AB 325, the Water Conservation in Landscaping Act. A copy of the draft Manual was filed
with the State in September, 1992, and a representative of the State Department of Water
Resources has acknowledged the City's compliance with AB 325. The Manual has also been
updated to include standards for public landscape installations, and to formally incorporate
current landscape practices from its last revision in 1978.
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council continue this item until November 8, 1994.
/.).~ I //.2 - .J
(' ')
\ /
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL of Chula vista, California, for the purpose of
considering revisions to the city Landscape Manual. The revisions
include (1) water conservation measures mandated by Assembly Bill
325, the Water conservation in Landscaping, (2) new sections on
drought tolerant and fire retardant plantings, water management
planning, and reclaimed water, and (3) miscellaneous amendments
intended to update the Manual to current practice from its last
revision in 1978. An Initial Study, IS-93-09, of possible
significant environmental impacts has been conducted by the
Environmental Review Coordinator. A finding of no significant
environmental impact has been recommended to the city Council and
is on file, along with the Initial Study, in the office of the
Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City
Council must be received in the city Clerk's office no later than
noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the city's action on this matter in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to
the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING HAS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR November 1, 1994 at 4:00
p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: October 19, 1994
CASE NO: PCM-94-20i PCA-94-02
COMPLIANCB WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIBS ACT
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), requests individuals who may require special
accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City
meeting, activity, or service to request such accommodation at least
forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days in advance
for scheduled services and activities. Please contact Nancy Ripley
for specific information at (619) 691-5101 or Telecommunications
Devices for the Deaf (TOO) (619) 585-5647. California Relay service
is available for the hearing impaired.
),)- f
111
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
An ordinance adopting Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer Analysis &
establishing Salt Creek Basin Development Impact of $280 per equivalent
dwelling unit (EDU).
Purpose of considering revisions to City Landscape Manual.
H you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
November 1, 1994, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: October 19, 1994
/ J- /5"
~.
.~ \~-
,..-ALL" IS'S AND EIR'S AI( ~O BE MAILED TO THIS LIST
~ ~ '
SANDAG
401 'B' Street, Ste 800
San Diego, CA 92101
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Attn: Don Reed
233 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
CHULA VISTA STAR NEWS
Att: C.V. City Hall Reporter
835 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
BUSINESS . PROFESSIONAL ASSN.
P.O. Box 284
Bonita, CA 91902
CALIF. NATIVE PLAN SOCIETY
c/o R. Michel Beauchamp
P.O. Box 985
National City, CA 91950
GARY FINK
883 La Senda Way
Chula Vista, CA 91910
, SWEETWATER VALLEY CIVIC ASSN.
I P.O. Box 232
- Bonita, CA 91902
I
I
I
SAN DIEGO UNION/THE TRIBUNE
555 'H' Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
CAM PATTERSON
S.D. Assn. of Environmental
Biologist
7460 Mission Valley Road
San Diego, CA 92108
SWEETWATER UNION H.S. DISTRICT
Attn: -Tom Silva
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91911
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
Attn: Bart Mumford
10595 Jamacha Road
Spring Valley, CA 9197~
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
Attn: Dick Reynolds
505 Garrett
Chula Vista, CA 91910
SWEETWATER COMMUNITY
Planning Group
Attn: John Hammond
P.O. Box 460
Bonita, CA 91902
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
DISTRICT
Attn: Kate Shurson
84 East 'J' Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
SAN DIEGO BIODIVERSITY PROJECT
Attn: David Hogan
P.O. Box 1944
Julian, CA 92036
SAN DIEGO AUDUBON SOCIETY, INC.
2321 Morena Blvd., Suite 0
San Diego, Ca 92110
);2 -?
.
CITIZENS COORD. FOR CENTURY
THREE
1549 El Prado
San Diego, CA 92103
CROSSROADS
c/o Carol Freno
3703 Alta Loma Drive
Bonita, CA 91902
CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Attn: Maureen Roeber
Eastlake Development Co.
Attn: Katy Wright
900 Lane Avenue, 1100
Chula Vista, CA 91914
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1:3
Meeting Date 11/1/94
SUBMITTED BY:
Public Hearing on Adoption of the Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer
Analysis and Establishment of the Salt Creek Basin Development Impact
Fee
Director of Public Works ~
City Manager.jQ?5~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
The Salt Creek Basin Development Impact Fee was scheduled to be on the agenda this
evening. New information was received recently concerning the size of the basin, which may
effect the amount of the fee. The report is being modified to include the impact on the fee by
the new information. Also, since part of the basin includes property located within the County
of San Diego, staff would like to meet County staff prior to the item being heard by Council.
All developers and property owners notified of the public hearing have been notified of the
continuance.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council continue the public hearing to the meeting of
December 6, 1994
.b
m:\homc\cngineer\agcnda\contsaLcrk
1;:1-/ /3-b
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
An ordinance adopting the Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer
Analysis and establislunent of the Salt Creek Basin Development
Impact Fee of $280 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU). Fee is
required to fmance necessary sewer system improvements. All
new developments located east of 1-805 that will discharge
wastewater into the Salt Creek Sewer Basin will need to pay this
fee at the time that building permits are issued.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, November
1, 1994, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
Dated: October 17, 1994
BVH:bvh
(BVH3\SAL TPUBL.HBR)
);v
..
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY TIlE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT TIlE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
An ordinance adopting Salt Creek Basin Gravity Sewer Analysis &
establishing Salt Creek Basin Development Impact of $280 per equivalent
dwelling unit (EDU).
Purpose of considering revisions to City Landscape Manual.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY TIlE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
November 1, 1994, at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: October 19, 1994
)3-~
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1'1
Meeting Date 11/01/94
ITEM TITLE: II. ORDINANCE .2. (,PB' Establishing and Amending Certain Time
Limitations in the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan
(J. ORDINANCE ..2" P' Establishing and Amending Certain Time
Limitations in the Town Centre I Redevelopment Plan
ORDINANCE ';;'/,11l Establishing and Amending Certain Time
Limitations in the Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan
c.
]).
ORDINANCE ~/'II Establishing and Amending Certain Time
Limitations in the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan
~. ORDINANCE .1. "/~ Establishing and Amending Certain Time
Limitations in the Southwest Redevelopment Plan
SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director L f.
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~ 00 (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No XI
BACKGROUND: The purpose of these or~n;::s is to amend all of the City's Redevelopment
Plans to incorporate certain time limits mandated by AB 1290 (and further refined in SB 732)
These time limits pertain to the establishment of indebtedness, effectiveness of
Redevelopment Plans and repayment of indebtedness. The legislation requires that a
Redevelopment Plan which either lacks the required time limits or which contains time limits
in excess of the maximums established by AB 1290 must be amended by ordinance before
the end of the calendar year to bring the plan into conformity with these requirements.
There is nothing in the new regulation restricting the Agency from designating new project
areas except that it will be more difficult to qualify new project areas under new blight criteria.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt the first reading of the ordinances amending the
Redevelopment Plan to conform to the requirements of AB 1290.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The OtayValley Road and Town Centre PACs
have been advised of this action.
DISCUSSION:
In an effort to limit the fiscal impacts of redevelopment upon other taxing jurisdictions, the
legislature incorporated certain time limitations pertaining to establishing and repaying debt
and the effectiveness of Redevelopment Plans in AB 1290 which was signed into law and
became effective on January 1, 1994 These limitations include the following (per Section
33333.6 of the Health and Safety Code)
1. A time limit of 20 years from the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, or until
January 1, 2004, whichever is later, for the establishment of loans, advances, and
/1f~1
,
"
I'
Page 2, Item 1'1
Meeting Date 11/01/94
indebtedness. This time limit may be extended by amendment of the Plan after the
Agency finds that significant blight remains which cannot be eliminated without
additional debt. The amended time limit may not exceed 10 years from the limit
established by this situation or the expiration of the Redevelopment Plan, whichever
is earlier.
2. The expiration date of every Redevelopment Plan shall not exceed 40 years from the
adoption date, or January 1, 2009, whichever is later After the expiration date, the
Agency shall have no authority to act pursuant to the plans except to pay previously
incurred indebtedness and to enforce existing covenants, contracts, or other
obligations.
3. Subject to specific exceptions for pre-existing obligations, a redevelopment agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes after 10 years from the
termination of the effectiveness of the redevelopment plan.
Unless redevelopment plans adopted prior to January 1, 1994 contain all of these provisions,
the City Council, acting by ordinance, must amend the plans prior to December 31, 1994
Chula Vista has five redevelopment plans, all adopted prior to January 1, 1994. All of the
plans will require amendment as further described below:
TIME LIMIT TO TIME LIMIT TO TERMINATION OF
PROJECT AREA ESTABLISH DEBT REPAY DEBT PLAN EFFECTIVENESS
BAYFRONT PLAN July 16, 1999 No Limit Ordinence 1541 Second
Reeding pessed end edopted
7116174
Expires in 25 years (19991
Required Amendment Not Appliceble 10 years efter termination Can be extended to 40 years
of Redevelopment Plen, through full plan amendment
which is July 16, 2009 process to Year 2014
TIME LIMIT TO TIME LIMIT TO TERMINATION OF
PROJECT AREA ESTABLISH DEBT REPAY DEBT PLAN EFFECTIVENESS
TOWN CENTRE I PLAN July 6, 2001 No Limit Ordinence 1691 Second
Reeding pessed end edopted
716176
Expires in 25 years (2001)
Required Amendment Not Applicable 10 years after termination Can be extended to 40 years
of Redevelopment Plan, through full plan amendment
which Is July 6, 2011 nrocess to Year 2016.
,1/- ,,2.
Page 3. Item 4
Meeting Date 11/01/94
TIME LIMIT TO TIME LIMIT TO TERMINATION OF
PROJECT AREA ESTABLISH DEBT REPAY DEBT PLAN EFFECTIVENESS
TOWN CENTRE II Life of the No Limit Ordinance 1827
ORIGINAL PROJECT Redevelopment Plan Second Reading passed and
AREA adopted 7/15/78.
Amended in 1987 and expires
in 45 years from 1987, or Year
2032.
Required Amendment Leter of 20 years after 10 years after termination For original project area, 40
Plan adoption, or Year of Redevelopment Plan, years from 1978, or Year
2004 which is July 15, 2028 201B.
TOWN CENTRE II Life of Redevelopment No Limit Ordinance 2274
AMENDMENT TO PLAN Plan Second Reading passed and
TO ADD TERRITORY adopted 7/19/88.
Expires in Year 3032.
Required Amendment Later of 20 yeers after 1 0 years after termination For 1988 amendment to add
Plan adoption, or Year of Redevelopment Plan, territory to project erea, 40
2008) which is July 19, 2038 years from 1988, or Year
2028.
TIME LIMIT TO TIME LIMIT TO TERMINATION OF
PROJECT AREA ESTABLISH DEBT REPAY DEBT PLAN EFFECTIVENESS
OTAY VALLEY ROAD No Limit No Limit Adopted 1983. Plan runs 45
PLAN years to 2028.
Ordinance 2059
Second Reading passed
and adopted 12/20/83
Required Amendment Later of 20 years after 10 years after termination 40 years (to 2023)
Plan adoption, or Year of Redevelopment Plan,
2004 which is December 20,
2033
/1./. J
Page 4, Item ~
Meeting Date 11/01/94
TIME LIMIT TO TIME LIMIT TO TERMINATION OF
PROJECT AREA ESTABLISH DEBT REPAY DEBT PLAN EFFECTIVENESS
SOUTHWEST PLAN 30 Years No Limit Adopted 1990. Plan runs 40
Ordinance 2420 years to 2030.
Second Reading passed
and adopted 11/27/90
Required Amendment 20 years after Plan 10 years after termination Not applicable.
adoption, or Year of Redevelopment Plan,
2004 which is November 27,
2040
The ordinances amend each of the five redevelopment plans as indicated above to be in
compliance with State Law. Although the Bayfront and Town Centre I projects have a
duration of 25 years and the law allows up to 40 years, the duration cannot be extended by
ordinance action. It can be extended through the normal plan amendment process which is
contemplated for the BayfrontlTown Centre as part of the Midbayfront Development Project.
The duration of projects can be shortened, however, by ordinance action which is proposed
for Town Centre II and Otay Valley Road which currently have 45 year durations.
These amendments must be approved by the end of the year to be in compliance with the
law Since these actions do not constitute a "project" under CEQA, they are categorically
exempt from environmental review
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed amendments will impact the Agency's ability to establish and
repay additional debt as described below.
Time Limit to Establish Debt
Time limits for the Bayfront and Town Centre I Project Areas were set by Ordinance 2146 in
1986 as follows: Bayfront, Vear 1999, Town Centre I, Vear 2001. Although the recent
changes in the Law will allow these limits to be extended to 2004, this can only be
accomplished through the full plan amendment process.
Town Centre II (the original project area) will have until 2004. The territory added in 1988,
can establish debt until 2008. Otay Valley Road can be extended to 2004, and Southwest
to 2010
These limits can be extended by amendment of the Redevelopment Plan if the Agency
determines that significant blight cannot be eliminated without additional debt. This finding
can be made when the Bayfront Plan is amended. Although additional tax increment bond
issues are not anticipated at this time, this limitation would also restrict loans and advances
from the City which may be necessary for the Bayfront to offset the current deficit.
/II- 'f
Page 5, Item /'1
Meeting Date 11/01/94
Time Limit to Reoav Debt
Aside from advances and loans from the City to all of the projects, the Bayfront is the only
project with outstanding bond indebtedness (tax increment bonds) Without a plan
amendment, any newly issued bonds would have to be paid off by 2009. The pending bonds
were authorized prior to January 1, 1 994 -- they fall under the exemption provided by Section
33333.6(h) and could be for a longer duration. By amending the plan to extend the duration
to 40 years (2014), the payback period will be extended to 2024
Limitina the Duration of Redevelooment Plans to 40 Years
Bayfront and Town Centre both have 25 year duration which may be extended to 40 years
by amending the Redevelopment Plan through the normal amendment process.
Town Centre II and Otay Valley Road have 45 years duration which must be reduced to 40
years, thereby reducing the number of years each project will be eligible to receive tax
increments and repay debt.
Southwest, with a duration of 40 years, will not be affected.
IBB\C:\WP51 \COUNCIL\ 113S\IMPLAN-1 113]
11/~5'
ORDINANCE
.2 4>~~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING AND
AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
FOR THE BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS. the City Council of the City of Chula Vista placed on Second Reading and
adopted Ordinance No.1 541 on July 16, 1974. approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan
(the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Bayfront Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the "Agency) has been
designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Chula Vista the
functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California
(Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS. Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law established certain
limitations on the incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of redevelopment plans,
which limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or before December 31, 1993, and
WHEREAS. Section 33333.6 further provides that unless a redevelopment plan adopted
prior to January 1. 1994 already contains limitations which comply with that Section, the
legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31. 1994 to amend the
Redevelopment Plan either: (1) to amend an existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time
limits of that Section; and or (2) to establish time limits that do not exceed the provisions of that
Section; and
WHEREAS. the time limit for establishing loans. advances, and indebtedness for the
Redevelopment Plan was established by Ordinance 2146 (placed on Second Reading and adopted
April 22, 1986) as July 16. 1999 This does not exceed the time limit established by Section
33333.6(a). and therefore no amendment is required relative to such limitation; and
WHEREAS. the time limit on the effectiveness of .the Redevelopment Plan, as set forth in
the Redevelopment Plan. is July 16, 1999. (twenty-five [25] years from the effective date of
adoption of the Plan). does not exceed the time limit established by Section 33333.6(b), and
therefore no amendment is required relating to such limitation, and
WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Plan as amended does not contain a limitation for the
repayment of debt as required by Section 33333.6 and. therefore the City Council is required to
establish a limit in conformance with the requirements of Section 33333.6 prior to December 31,
1994, and
WHEREAS. the establishment of time limits as required by Section 33333.6 does not
constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review; and
WHEREAS. Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) provides that the limitations
established by this Ordinance shall apply to the Redevelopment Plan as if the Redevelopment Plan
had been amended to include these limitations; however. neither the City nor the Agency is
required to comply with any of the procedural requirements of Article 1 2 of the Redevelopment
Law pertaining to the amendment of redevelopment plans when adopting this Ordinance.
/JlI9-/
Ordinance xxxx
Page 2
NOW THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA DOES HEREBY
ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1 The Section of the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan entitled Methods for Financing
the Project, subsection entitled Tax Increments is hereby amended by adding the following:
Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6 or
other provisions of Community Redevelopment Law. the Redevelopment Agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Section 33670 of
the Health and Safety Code after ten (10) years from the termination of the
effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan. Based upon the termination date set
forth in the Redevelopment Plan. the Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive
property taxes pursuant to Section 33670 after July 16. 2009.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to
the Agency.
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage.
Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the
passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Star News, a
newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Chula Vista, California.
Section 5. Severabilitv. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any reason,
such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance, and this City
Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this Ordinance, if such invalid
portion thereof had been deleted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of November 1994, by the following vote:
PRESENTED BY:
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
~~
~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
[C:\WP51 \COUNCIL\RESOSIORO-XXX1.0RDJ
/14 ,~
;
,.J
,
.2t,P9
ORDINANCE xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND
AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE TOWN CENTRE I REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista placed on Second Reading and
adopted Ordinance No. 1691 on July 6,1976 approving and adopting the Redevelopment Plan
(the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Town Centre Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the" Agency") has
been designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Chula Vista
the functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law established
certain limitations on the incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of
redevelopment plans, which limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or
before December 31, 1993; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 further provides that unless a redevelopment plan
adopted prior to January 1, 1 994 already contains limitations which comply with that Section,
the legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31, 1994 to amend the
redevelopment plan either (1) to amend an existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time
limit established by that Section, or (2) to establish time limits that do not exceed the
provisions of that Section; and
WHEREAS, the time limit for establishing loans, advances, and indebtedness was
established by Ordinance 2146 (placed on Second Reading and adopted April 22, 1986) as
July 6, 2001 and does not exceed the time limit established by Section 33333.6(a), and
therefore no amendment is required relative to such limitation, and
WHEREAS, the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan, as set forth
in Section 1000 of the Redevelopment Plan, currently scheduled to terminate on July 6, 2001
twenty-five (25) years from the date of adoption of the plan, does not exceed the time limit
established by Section 33333.6(b), and therefore no amendment is required. relating to such
limitation, and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan as amended does not contain a limitation for the
repayment of debt as required by Section 33333.6 and, therefore the City Council is required
to establish a limit in conformance with the requirements of Section 33333.6 prior to
December 31, 1994; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of time limits as required by Section 33333.6 does not
constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) provides that the
limitations established by this Ordinance shall apply to the Redevelopment Plan as if the
Redevelopment Plan had been amended to include these limitations, however, neither the City
nor the Agency is required to comply with any of the procedural requirements of Article 1 2
/18-/
Ordinance xxxx
Page 2
of the Redevelopment law pertaining to the amendment of redevelopment plans when
adopting this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1 Section 10000fthe Town Centre I Redevelopment Plan is hereby amended
by adding the following paragraph:
Section 1000. Effectiveness Period
1000.2 Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code
Section 33333.6 or other provisions of Community Redevelopment Law. the
Redevelopment Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes
pursuant to Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code after ten (10) years
from the termination of the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan as
modified by Section 2 of this Ordinance. except as otherwise authorized. the
Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes after July 6.
2011.
Section 2. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance
to the Agency
Section 3. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage.
Section 4. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the
passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Star News. a
newspaper of general circulation. published and circulated in the City of Chula Vista,
California.
Section 5. Severabilitv. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any
reason. such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance.
and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this
Ordinance. if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of November 1994, by the following
vote:
PRESENTED BY.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
_~t.J-o ~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
~~o--
Ansel
-Gr-
IC:\ WP51 \COUNCIL \RESO 5\0 RD- XXX4.0RD I
J4/lJ-~
J61P
ORDINANCE xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA. ESTABLISHING AND
AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE TOWN CENTRE II REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista placed on Second
Reading and adopted Ordinance 1827 on August 15. 1978 approving and adopting the
Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Town Centre II Redevelopment
Project; and
WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the" Agency") has
been designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Chula Vista
the functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS. the Redevelopment Plan was amended in May 1987 to incorporate the
authority to collect tax increment revenues. and amended a second time in June 1988 to add
territory; and
WHEREAS. Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law established
certain limitations on the incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of
redevelopment plans, which limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or
before December 31. 1993; and
WHEREAS. Section 33333.6 further provides that unless a redevelopment plan
adopted prior to January 1, 1994 already contains limitations which comply with that Section.
the legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31. 1994 to amend the
redevelopment plan either (1) to amend an existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time
limit established by that Section, or (2) to establish time limits that do not exceed the
provisions of that Section; and
WHEREAS. the time limit for establishing loans, advances. and indebtedness for the
original Redevelopment Plan (Ordinance 1827 adopted 8/15/78) and the Amendment to the
Plan adding territory (Ordinance 2274 adopted July 19. 1988) do not comply with the
requirements established Section 33333.6(8), and therefore the City Council is required to
establish a limit in conformation with the requirements of Section 33333.6 prior to December
31.1994. and
WHEREAS. the original Redevelopment Plan and the Amendment to the Plan adding
territory do not contain a limitation for the repayment of debt as required by Section 33333.6
and. therefore the City Council is required to establish a limit in conformance with the
requirements of Section 33333.6 prior to December 31. 1994; and
WHEREAS. the time limit on the effectiveness of the original Redevelopment Plan and
the Amendment to the Plan adding territory. as set forth in the Redevelopment Plan. do not
comply with the requirements established in Section 33333.6(8), and therefor the City Council
is required to establish a limit in conformation with the requirements of Section 33333.6 prior
to December 31. 1994. and
)lIC~1
Ordinance xxxx
Page 2
WHEREAS. the establishment of time limits as required by Section 33333.6 does not
constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review; and
WHEREAS. Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e}(2} provides that the
limitations established by this Ordinance shall apply to the Redevelopment Plan as if the
Redevelopment Plan had been amended to include these limitations; however, neither the City
nor the Agency is required to comply with any of the procedural requirements of Article 12
of the Redevelopment law pertaining to the amendment of redevelopment plans when
adopting this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCil OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1. Section 750.3 of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan is hereby
amended by replacing the existing Section with the following paragraphs:
The time limit on the establishment of loans. advances. and indebtedness
shall not exceed 20 years from the adoption of the original Redevelopment
Plan or January 1. 2004. whichever is later and for the Amendment to the
Plan adding territory shall not exceed 20 years from said adoption of the
Amendment or January 1. 2004. whichever is later Based upon the adoption
date of the original Redevelopment Plan this time limit shall be January 1.
2004; and. based upon the adoption date of the Amendment to the Plan
adding territory this time limit shall be July 19. 2008. This limit. however.
shall not prevent redevelopment agencies from incurring debt to the paid from
the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund or establishing more debt in
order to fulfill the Agency's housing obligations under Section 33413.
The time limits established by this subdivision may be extended only by
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Community
Redevelopment Law
Section 2. Section 700.32 is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph at
the end of the Section.
Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code Section
33333.6 or other provisions of Community Redevelopment Law. the
Redevelopment Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes
pursuant to Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code in that portion of
the project area included within the original Redevelopment Plan after ten (10)
years from the termination of the original Redevelopment Plan. Based upon
the termination date of the original Redevelopment Plan as amended by
Section 3 of Ordinance . except as otherwise authorized. the
Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes in that portion of
the project area included in the original project area after August 15. 2028.
II/C....;..
Ordinance xxxx
Page 3
Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6 or
other provision of the Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes pursuant to Section 33670 of the
Health and Safety Code in that portion of the project area added to the project area
by the 1988 amendment to the Redevelopment Plan after ten (10) years from the
termination of the amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. Based upon the
termination date of the 1988 amendment to the Redevelopment Plan as amended by
Section 3 of Ordinance No. . except as otherwise authorized, the Agency
shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes in that portion of the project area
added to the project area by the 1988 amendment to the Redevelopment Plan after
July 19,2038.
Section 3. Section 1000 of the Town Centre II Redevelopment Plan is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:
Section toOO. Effectiveness Period
1000.1 Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation
provisions, which shall run in perpetuity, the provisions of the original Plan and
the Amendment to the Plan adding territory shall be effective and the
provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to the original Plan and
Amendment to the Plan may be made effective for forty (40) years from the
date of the adoption of the original Plan and the Amendment to the Plan
adding territory by the City Council. Based upon the adoption date of the
original Plan, the original Plan shall terminate on August 15, 2018. Based
upon the effective date of the Amendment to the Plan adding territory, the
Amendment to the Plan shall terminate on July 19, 2028. Unless projects
contemplated under the Redevelopment Plan are undertaken within ten (10)
years of the date of the adoption or amendment of the Redevelopment Plan,
respectively, then said projects shall not be undertaken thereafter unless a
public hearing is conducted by the Redevelopment Agency to consider the
desirability of undertaking the proposed projects in light of conditions as they
then exist.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance
to the Agency.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage.
Section 6. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the
passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Star News, a
newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Chula Vista,
California.
Section 7. Severabilitv. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any
reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance,
and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this
Ordinance, if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.
I~C~3
Ordinance xxxx
Page 4
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
vote:
PRESENTED BY:
-~~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
[C:IWP51ICOUNC1LIRESOSIORO-XXX5.0ROI
day of November 1994, by the following
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY
~
/J/c..i
.J.~) I
ORDINANCE xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND
AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista placed on Second Reading and
adopted Ordinance No. 2059 December 20, 1983, approving and adopting the Redevelopment
Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the" Agency") has
been designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Chula Vista
the functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law established
certain limitations on the incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of
redevelopment plans, which limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or
before December 31, 1993, and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 further provides that unless a redevelopment plan
adopted prior to January 1, 1994 already contains limitations which comply with that Section,
the legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31, 1994 to amend the
redevelopment plan either (1) to amend an existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time
limit established by that Section, or (2) to establish time limits that do not exceed the
provision of that Section; and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan does not contain any time limit for either the
establishment of debt or the repayment of debt and therefore, pursuant to Section 33333.6
the City Council is required to establish such limitations by ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the current duration of the Redevelopment Plan is 45 years, which
duration does not conform to the requirements of Section 33333.6 and therefore the City
Council is obligated to modify the duration of the Redevelopment Plan to comply with the
requirements of Section 33333.6; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of time limits as required by Section 33333.6 does not
constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) provides that the
limitations established by this Ordinance shall apply to the Redevelopment Plan as if the
Redevelopment Plan had been amended to include these limitations; however, neither the City
nor the Agency is required to comply with any of the procedural requirements of Article 12
of the Redevelopment Law pertaining to the amendment of redevelopment plans when
adopting this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
,IIP-/
Ordinance xxxx
Page 2
Section 1. Section 700.80 of the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan is hereby
amended by adding the following paragraphs at the end of the Section:
The time limit on the establishment of loans, advances, and indebtedness
shall not exceed 20 years from the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan or
January 1, 2004, whichever is later. Based upon the adoption date of the
Redevelopment Plan this time limit shall be January 1, 2004. This limit,
however, shall not prevent redevelopment agencies from incurring debt to be
paid from the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund or establishing more
debt in order to fulfill the Agency's housing obligations under Section 33413.
The time limit established by this subdivision may be extended only by
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Community
Redevelopment Law.
Section 2. Section 700.32 is hereby amended by adding the following paragraph at
the end of the Section.
Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code Section
33333.6 or other provisions of Community Redevelopment Law, the
Redevelopment Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes
pursuant to Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code after ten (10) years
from the termination of the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan as
modified by Section 3 of this Ordinance. Except as otherwise authorized, the
Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes after December
20, 2033.
Section 3. Section 1000 of the Redevelopment Plan is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Except for the nondiscrimination and nonsegregation provisions, which
shall run in perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective and the
provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made
effective for forty (40) years from the date of the adoption of this Plan by the
City Council. Based upon the effective date of this Plan, the Plan shall
terminate on December 20, 2023. Unless projects contemplated under the
Redevelopment Plan are undertaken within ten (10) years of the date of the
adoption of the Redevelopment Plan, then said projects shall not be
undertaken thereafter unless a public hearing is conducted by the
Redevelopment Agency to consider the desirability of undertaking the
proposed projects in light of conditions as they then exist.
Section 4. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance
to the Agency.
Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage.
IYP-;J.
Ordinance )(Xxx
Page 3
Section 6. Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the
passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Star News, a
newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Chula Vista,
California.
Section 7. Severabilitv. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any
reason, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance,
and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this
Ordinance, if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
day of November 1994, by the following
vote:
PRESENTED BY.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY'
c&A'~'4 ~
Chn Salomone
Community Development Director
~
IC:\ WP51 \COUNCIL \RESO S\O RD- XXX2.0RDJ
III}) "3
J." J.2..
ORDINANCE xxxx
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AND
AMENDING CERTAIN TIME LIMITATIONS WITH RESPECT TO THE REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN FOR THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista placed on Second Reading and
adopted Ordinance No. 2420 on November 27, 1990 approving and adopting the
Redevelopment Plan (the "Redevelopment Plan") for the Southwest Redevelopment Project;
and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista (the "Agency") has
been designated as the official redevelopment agency to carry out in the City of Chula Vista
the functions and requirements of the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of
California (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) and to implement the
Redevelopment Plan; and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 of the Community Redevelopment Law established
certain limitations on the incurring and repaying of indebtedness and the duration of
redevelopment plans, which limitations apply to every redevelopment plan adopted on or
before December 31, 1993, and
WHEREAS, Section 33333.6 further provides that unless a redevelopment plan
adopted prior to January 1, 1994 already contains limitations which comply with that Section,
the legislative body shall adopt an ordinance on or before December 31, 1994 to amend the
redevelopment plan either (1) to amend an existing time limit that exceeds the applicable time
limit established by that Section, or (2) to establish time limits that do not exceed the
provisions of that Section; and
WHEREAS, the time limit on the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan, as set forth
in Section 1000 of the Redevelopment Plan, is forty (40) years from the date of adoption of
the Plan and does not exceed the time limit established by Section 33333.6(b) of the
Community Redevelopment Law, and therefore no amendment is required relating to such
limitation, and
WHEREAS, the time limit for the establishment of debt set forth in the Redevelopment
Plan exceeds the time limit established pursuant to Section 33333.6 the City Council is
required to modify the time limit to comply with the requirements of Section 33333.6, and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Plan does not contain any time limit for the repayment
of debt and therefore, pursuant to Section 33333.6 the City Council is required to establish
such limitations by ordinance, and
WHEREAS, the establishment of time limits as required by Section 33333.6 does not
constitute a project under California Environmental Quality Act and is therefore categorically
exempt from environmental review; and
WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 33333.6(e)(2) provides that the
limitations established by this Ordinance shall apply to the Redevelopment Plan as if the
Redevelopment Plan had been amended to include these limitations; however, neither the City
nor the Agency is required to comply with any of the procedural requirements of Article 12
lifE -J
\~)
Ordinance xxxx
Page 2
of the Redevelopment Law pertaining to the amendment of redevelopment plans when
adopting this Ordinance.
NOW THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES
HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOllOWS:
Section 1 The last paragraph of Section 703 of the Southwest Redevelopment Plan
is deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:
The time limit on the establishment of loans. advances. and indebtedness
shall not exceed 20 years from the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan or
January 1. 2004. whichever is later. Based upon the adoption date of the
Redevelopment Plan this time limit shall be November 27. 2010. This limit.
however. shall not prevent redevelopment agencies from incurring debt to the
paid from the Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Fund or establishing more
debt in order to fulfill the Agency's housing obligations under Section 33413.
The time limit established by this subdivision may be extended only by
amendment of the Redevelopment Plan in accordance with Community
Redevelopment Law
Section 2. Section 1000 of the Southwest Redevelopment Plan is hereby amended
by adding the following paragraph at the end of the Section:
Except as expressly authorized by Health and Safety Code Section
33333.6 or other provisions of Community Redevelopment Law. the
Redevelopment Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes
pursuant to Section 33670 of the Health and Safety Code after ten (10) years
from the termination of the effectiveness of the Redevelopment Plan as
modified by Section 2 of this Ordinance. except as otherwise authorized. the
Agency shall not pay indebtedness or receive property taxes after November
27.2040.
Section 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to send a certified copy of this Ordinance
to the Agency
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage.
Section 5 Publication. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and directed to certify to the
passage of this Ordinance and to cause the same to be published once in the Star News. a
newspaper of general circulation. published and circulated in the City of Chula Vista.
California.
Section 6. Severabilitv. If any part of this Ordinance is held to be invalid for any
reason. such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance,
and this City Council hereby declares that it would have passed the remainder of this
Ordinance. if such invalid portion thereof had been deleted.
JlI c -.J...
iil
\""
PASSED AND ADOPTED this
vote:
PRESENTED BY:
-~~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
[C:IWP51ICOUNCILIRESOSIORO-XXX3.0RDI
Ordinance xxxx
Page 3
day of November 1994, by the following
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY'
~
J'IE--:;
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
--
Item ~
Meeting Date 11/1/94
ITEM TITLE:
Report on SANDAG Series 8 Population and Housing Forecast and Land
Use Distribution Element
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning .&{...
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.1O
SANDAG has released for public review two elements of the Regional Growth Management
Strategy. the Series 8 Regional Population and Housing Forecast, and the Land Use Distribution
Element (Attachments A and B). On August 15, 1994, Mayor Nader requested that the Planning
Commission and Resource Conservation Commission review these documents, and provide
comments to the City Council. On September 21, the Planning Commission and Resource
Conservation Commission held a joint workshop, and heard a presentation from SANDAG staff
on these two documents. Subsequently, both commissions have forwarded recommendations to
the City Council.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council direct the City Manager to submit a letter to
SANDAG containing the comments contained in the "Analysis" section of this report, along with
any other comments that the City Council wishes to forward. (Note: SANDAG staff will be
present at the meeting to make a brief presentation and answer questions regarding these
reports. )
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On September 26, the Resource
Conservation Commission voted to endorse the Series 8 Forecast and the Land Use Distribution
Element, with additional recommendations regarding school and park facilities (see attached
minutes) On October 26, the Planning Commission also voted to endorse the Land Use
Distribution Element and the Series 8 Forecast.
DISCUSSION:
Backl!round
The draft Series 8 Forecast distributes expected growth through the year 2005 among the San
Diego region's 18 cities and the unincorporated area, based primarily on adopted general plans
and community plans. On a regional basis, this reflects an increase from a population of
2,498,016 in 1990 to 3,278,885 in 2005, or a 31 % increase. For the Chula Vista sphere of
influence, the projected change is from 148,483 in 1990 to 200,411 in the year 2005, or a 35%
increase over the same period.
/5'~/
Page 2, Item If
Meeting Date 11/1/94
The Land Use Distribution Element addresses the issues of how to effectively manage and plan
for population and housing growth. The Element would establish access standards (maximum
travel times and distances) as objectives to be pursued in future land use and transportation
planning. In addition, the Element proposes specific land use and transportation policies which
are intended to help cities and the County meet these access standards. Implementation of these
policies would result in development patterns that promote transit ridership, decrease automobile
travel, and improve other quality of life measures such as air quality.
Analvsis
City staff has reviewed these documents, and has the following comments:
I) Series 8 Forecast
Staff has reviewed the draft forecast in relation to previous development forecasts
prepared by the City for the Growth Management Oversight Commission, the Interim
SR-125 study, the Otay Ranch project review, and other relevant information. We have
concluded that the proposed forecast for the existing City of Chula Vista boundary, as
well as the current sphere of influence, is consistent with local forecasts and analysis.
However, we are concerned that the forecast figures for the Otay Ranch area (which is
shown as part of the "unincorporated area" forecast) are too high, and we are continuing
to work with SANDAG and County staff to resolve these concerns.
2) Land Use Distribution Element
Staff has also reviewed this document, and fmds that it provides a good framework for
future local planning to consider land use and transportation measures that will reduce
vehicle miles travelled, mitigate air quality impacts, and reduce land consumption.
However, we would like to see the report discuss the possible impacts of higher intensity
development on public services (roads, schools, parks, etc.) and the need to ensure that
these impacts are mitigated. For example, it may be possible to create incentives for
cities which comply with the Land Use Distribution Element, such as giving them
priority in regional transportation funding or other financial programs. Such a discussion
would address the concerns raised by the Resource Conservation Commission regarding
school and park facilities.
In addition, staff finds that these reports do not adequately address the issues regarding longer-
range forecasting, and the possible results of local jurisdictions deciding not the implement the
policies contained in the Land Use Distribution Element. The introduction to the Series 8
Forecast points out that the current general plans of the County and 18 cities cannot
accommodate forecasted residential growth through the year 2015. It is further pointed out that
implementation of the policies contained in the Land Use Distribution Element would result in
/~.2..
,
\ !j
Page 3, Item if
Meeting Date 11/1/94
more compact urban growth, and could allow forecasted growth to be accommodated through
2015. However, if local jurisdictions decide not to implement these policies, and the growth
forecasts are accurate, then one or more of the following scenarios (or some combination
thereof) may be expected:
1) further urbanization in or near existing "country towns" in the unincorporated area, such
as Jamul and Ramona;
2) establishment of "new towns" in outlying areas of the County;
3) continued employment growth without corresponding residential development, which
would ultimately result in higher populations per household.
Each of these scenarios, as well as others, would have certain environmental and economic
consequences which need to be considered when evaluating the merits of adopting the policies
contained in the Land Use Distribution Element. However, these issues are not adequately
addressed in these reports.
FISCAL IMPACT: Ongoing City staff participation in the preparation and review of these
reports is supported by the City General Fund. Implementation of the policies contained in the
draft Land Use Distribution Element could result in significant additional staff costs, depending
on whether it was done in conjunction with regularly scheduled updates of plans, or as a separate
planning effort.
Attachments:
Attachment A - Draft Series 8 Forecast
Attachment B - Land Use Distribution Element
Attachment C - Excerpt from Resource Conservation Commission Minutes, dated September 26,1994 NOr SCflAJAJtfj)
Attachment D - Excerpt from Draft Plamting Commission Minutes of October 26, 1994 /110 r s~A~P ~
(F6\sandags8.all)
1~3 /H ,3
/
11.\ ?
f~/5'
.
ATTACHMENT A
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST FOR
JURISDICTIONS AND OTHER COMMUNITIES
.
.
J5~
..
. .
.
.
'-
ATTACHMENT A
Sa Dieco I.", ,..;:.tloe fII Got_ -.ts
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
July 22, 1994
14-07.14
AGENDA REPORT No.:
Action Requested: llECOMMEND APPROVAL
BY THE t,;uw
AND THE COUNTY;
APPROVE FOR USE
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROW'IH FORECAST FOR
JURISDICTIONS AND 01HER COMMUNITIES
Introduction
The Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast is an important pan of the Regional Growth
Management Strategy. Like its predecessors, this Growth Forecast is used by SANDAG, its
member agencies, and many other public and private leCtOr eDtities iD plans and IIlUdies that
require population, bousiDg and employment data.
SANDAG's Regional Growth Forecast is produced iD two phases. 1be fint pbase is the
regionwide forecast. It produces population, bousiDg, employment and other powtb-related
iDformation for the entire San Diego region. ID September 1993, the Board ret........ the
regionwide forecast - termed the Economic Prosperity Forecast - for review and comment and
for use iD the second phase of the Growth Forecast. 1be aec:ond pbase .tlnMot..-s the regionwide
forecast to jurisdictions, communities and other aqrapbic ueas witbiD tile recion.
The regionwide Economic Prosperity Forecast iDcludt-s tile tactics COJIhIi-' iD the Recional
Economic Prosperity Strategy designed to help IOlve tile 1qiOD'. most imponant economic
problems. It is the fint forecast produced by SANDAG to include IpeCifk: cbanJCS to current
policies and trends related to the region's employment powtb. This foroc:ast iDdiClt.... that the
region's civilian employment base wiD pow by 359,000 jobs from 1990 to tile year 2015, an
iDc:rease or 32 percent. It iDcludes an Idditional 59,000 jobs over an a1terDative rqionwide
forecast based primarily on recent trends.
1be region'. population wiD pow by 51 peRlCDt (1.3 111m;"., perIODS) by tile ,ear 2015.
Natunl iDc:rease (births miDus delth~) ICCOUnts for 52 perceDt or this powtb wbile tile J'eIII.i......~
is due to people moviD& iDto tile region.
The Regional Growth Management Technical C'......mittoe IpCIlt . COIIIidcrable amount of time
and effon iD workiDi with staff'duriD& this aec:ond phase, to aJ10cate the regionwide forecast to
jurisdictions and other communities witbiD the 1qiOD. This COIIIIIlittee is composed of pt.","",
representatives from each member agency. Traditionally, the IOCODd phase of the Regional
Jf~?
I
\.,6
Growth Forea.st was completed by allocating the regionwide forecast based on the land use and
growth policies of the region's jurisdictions. For the first time, local jurisdiction plans could
not accommodate the regionwide forecast; therefore, the committee looked at alternatives to the
existing plans.
A "quality of life" land use distribution alternative was formulated which would better manage
future growth and thus accommodate the regionwide forecast to the year 2015. Implementation
of this alternative would require major changes to the general and community plans and
development policies of most cities and the County. These changes were viewed by the
representatives of those jurisdictions as being unacceptable at this time from a local policy
ItaDdpoint. As a result, staff prepared a Series 8 allocation which reflects the current land use
and growth policies of the region's jurisdictions; however, this allocation using current policies
does not accommodate the regionwide population and housing forecast beyond the year 2005.
-..,
The attachment to this report shows the population, housing and employment forecast to the year
2005 for each jurisdiction and sphere of influence. It is the Regional Growth Management
Technical Committee's and my
RECOMMENDATION
that the Board recommend that the cities and the County approve the Series 8 Regional Growth
Forecast to the year 2005 for inclusion in the Regional Growth Management Strategy and that
this foreast be approved for use in planning and other studies. It is further recommended that -..,
the actions contained in the Land Use Distribution Element be used to solve the problems
identified by the Series 8 forecast.
Di~~sion
The Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast is a result of a cooperative effort among the cities and
the county. It shows the likely distribution of 3.0 million people and 1.24 million jobs
throughout the region in the year 2000 and 3.28 million people and 1.37 million jobs in the year
2005. The forecast for jurisdictions and other communities reflects the current public policies
contained in the local agencies' general and community plans.
Some of the uses of the Regional Growth Forecast are abown below.
. City, county, community. and capital facUities planning
. Planning by special purpose agencies and districts and the private sector in the preparation
of development plans, business plans. and C\llvironmenta1 impact reports
. All SANDAG studies and plans described in the Overall WOJk Program, iDe1""i'11 the
evaluation of elements of the Regional Growth ManagemC\llt Strategy
. Preparation of federal and state pant applications by local qeocies for populatioD-lerVing
public facilities
Several problems were identified during the IOCOIId phase of the forecast. 1be regionwide -..,
Economic Prosperity Forecast rele-..... by the Board exteDdec:I to the year 2015. In attempting ...
2 /~_?
,
. . to distribute the growth beyond the year 2005, the legion is confronted with something that has
never occurred in the 2G-plus years that SANDAG has been producing growth forecasts: A
forecast based on cunently adopted genen} and community plans runs out of land pl,..ftl'lII for
uJban residential development. In the year 200S, only 14,000 vacant urban residential acres
remain in the region. All of this land and more is DHded to accommodate the region's
forecasted growth beyond the year 200S. Attempting to distribute forecastled growth beyond the
year 200S would cause unrealistically high levels of development in the outlying areas of the
region and would not preserve CI10Ugh vacant urban residential land aeeded for habitat
conservation.
The issues identified in this report are medium to long term in nature. However, this Series 8
forecast illustrates that implementation of our current geoeraI and COIDIilunity plans will result
in some problems for us in the years ahead.
The Regional Growth Management Strategy identifies solutions to the problems resulting from
the region's growth. The Land Use Distribution Element of the Strategy (Agenda Report #IS)
contains recommendations designed to correct these problems. If adopted as policy by the cities
and County, these recommendations will be reflected in future Regional Growth' Forecasts.
A forecast beyond the year 200S is needed for transportation and other studies. Staff will work
with the Growth Management Committee to prepare this technical forecast.
.
In
KENNEm E. SULZER
Executive Director
Attachment
Key Staff Contact: Jeff Tayman, 59S-5374
Funds are Budgeted in Oven11 Work Program #102.07
.
3 15-~
,/
/L
\ \
\
Attachment
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST, 1990-2005
EXISTING POLICIES ALTERNATIVE (July 1994)
,.
TOTAL POPULATION: JURISDICTIONS AND SPHERES OF INFLUENCE
This forecast is subject to change. The numbers have not been adopted 1990 - 2005 1990-2005
or endorsed and should be used with that understandina. Chanae Avg. Annual
Jurisdiction 1990 iQQQ ~ Absolute Pereent % Chanae
Carlsbad 63,126 93,134 106,420 43,294 68.6% 3.6%
Chula Vista 135,163 162,201 164,744 29,581 21.9% 1.3%
Coronado 26,540 29,096 29,016 2,476 9.3% 0.6%
Del Mar 4,860 5,477 5,409 649 11.3% 0.7%
EI Cajon 88,693 95,694 95,109 6,416 7.2% 0.5%
Encinitas 55,386 63,152 64,914 9,528 17.2% 1.1%
Escondido . 108,635 131,371 137,639 29,004 26.7% 1.6%
Imperial Beach 26,512 30,184 31,107 4,595 17.3% 1.1%
La Mesa 52,931 58,615 58,738 5,807 11.0% 0.7%
Lamon Grove 23,984 26,994 27.432 3,448 14.4% 0.9%
National City 54,249 58.493 59,987 5.738 10.6% 0.7%
Oceanside 128,398 161.368 169,257 40,859 31.8% 1.9%
Poway 43,516 50,727 51,028 7,512 17.3% 1.1%
San Diego 1,110,549 1,293,018 1,410,138 299,589 27.0% 1.6%
San Marcos 38,974 66.108 80,278 41,304 106.0% 5.0%
Santee 52,902 62,602 67,298 14,396 27.2% 1.6%
Solana Beach 12,962 14.653 14,382 1,420 11.0% 0.7%
Vista 71,872 86,100 88,783 16,911 23.5% 1.4%
Unincorporated Area 39B,764 513,175 617,206 218,442 54.8% 3.0%
San Diego Region 2,498,016 3,002,162 3,278,885 780,869 31.3% 1.1%
1990 - 2005 11190-2005
Change Avg. Annual
SDhere of Influence 1990 iQQQ ~ Absolute Pareent . % Chanae
Chula Vista 148,483 186.249 200,411 51,928 35.0% 2.0%
EI Cajon 104,416 112,553 112,214 7,798 7.5% 0.5%
Enclnitas 55,$44 63,434 86,404 10,860 19.6% 1.2%
ElCOIIdiclo 126,797 153,997 163,602 36,605 28.0% 1.7%
National City 58,225 80,585 82,023 &,798 10.3% 0.7%
Poway 43,664 51,015 51,323 7,659 17.5% 1.1%
San Marcos 43,795 72,225 87.100 43,305 ..9% 4.7%
Vista 84,1132 102,071 106,826 21,894 25.5% 1.5%
""'"
""'"
,
'""'"
,
SANDAG
401 B STREET, SUITE 800, SAN DIEGO CA 92101
(619) 595-5300
07/'2/84
Sources: 'ISlO eeMUS 01 Population and Housing; Series a Regional Growth ~ SANOAG
4 /5-;
,
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST,1990-2005
. . EXISTING POLICIES ALTERNATIVE (July 1994)
TOTAL HOUSING UNITS: JURISDICTIONS AND SPHERES OF INFWENCE
t This fcncalt is lubject to change. The numbers haw not been adopted
11190 - 2005 11190- 2005
or endorsed and Ihould be uled with that understandin . Chane AV;. Annual
Jurisdiction 1990 iQQQ i9Q2 Ablolute Percent I % Chanae
Carllbad 27.235 38.073 44.754 17.519 64,3% '.4%
Chula Vilta 49.849 56.004 57,999 8.150 18.3% 1.0%
Coronado 9,145 8.569 8.828 683 7.5% 0.5%
Del Mar 2.514 2.565 2.581 67 2.7% 0.2"-
EI Cajon 34.453 34.963 35.084 831 1.8% 0.1%
Enclnltas 22,123 23.587 24.596 2.473 11.2"- 0.7%
Eecondido 42.040 47,697 51,035 8.995 21.4% 1.3%
Imperial Beach 9.525 10.041 10.570 1,045 11.0% 0.7%
La Mesa 24.154 24.838 25,151 1197 4.1% 0.3%
Lamon Grove 8.638 9.106 9.447 809 9.4% 0.6%
Nationa' City 15.243 15.824 16.674 1.431 9.4% 0.6%
Oceanside 51.109 59.611 63.925 12.816 25.1% 1.5%
Powey 14,386 15.944 16,423 2.037 14.2% 0.9%
San Diego 431.722 472.771 527.904 116.182 22.3% 1.4%
San Marcos 14.476 22,818 28.608 14.132 87.6% 4.7%
Santee 18.275 20.496 22.380 4,105 22.5% 1.4%
Solana Beach 6,346 6.456 6.478 132 2.1% 0.1%
Vilta 27,418 30.765 32.506 5.090 18.6% 1.1%
Unincorporated Area 137.589 169,062 209.589 72.000 52.3% 2.8%
San Diego Region 146,240 1,070.280 1,185,584 249,294 26.'% 1.8%
11190 - 2005
Chan
Sollara oIlnftuence
Chula Vilta
EI Cajon
Enclnltal
Eecondido
National City
P_y
San Marcos
Vilta
~ iQQQ /~
54,357 ,,>>,.83.473 IIl..J 89.119
40.615 41.198 I 41.489
22.182 23,702 25,865
48,209 54.983 111.618
15,850 18,431 17,281
14.443 18,037 18,521
17.167 25.827 12.114
12.061 88.082 .,879
Absolute
14.782
174
',183
11.409
1,431
2,078
14,1147
8,518
Percent
27.2%
2.2%
14.'%
23.7%
8.0'JI0
14.4%
17.1%
20.1%
11190 - 2005
AV;. Annual
% Chanaa
1.8%
0.1%
0.8%
1.4%
0.8%
0.8%
4.8%
1.2%
SANDAG 401 B STREET. SUITE 800. SAN DIEGO CA 82101 (819) 595-5300
80..-: 1lll1O CeIllUl of Population and HoUIinSl; Seriell Aeglo~ Cirowth "'" 1 C III. 8AW:)AG / Y / tJ a7/12/84 i,
S
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST, 1990-2005
EXISTING POLICIES ALTERNATIVE (July 1994)
TOTAl EMPLOYMENT: JURISDICTIONS AND SPHERES OF INFWENCE
This forecast is subject to change. The numbers have not been adopted 1990 - 2005 1990-2005
or endorsed and should be used with that understand inn . Channe AV;. Annual
Jurisdiction 1990 2000 2005 Absolute Percent % ChanAe
Carlsbad 35,023 37,109 44,874 9,851 28.1% 1.7%
Chula Vista 50,777 52,321 57,823 7,046 13.9% 0.9%
Coronado 33,325 33,593 33,794 469 1.4% 0.1%
DelMar 3,809 3,795 3,798 -11 -0.3% -0.0%
EI Cajon 43,305 42,617 45,496 2,191 5.1% 0.3%
Encinltas 23,858 23,912 25,393 1,535 6.4% 0.4%
Escondido 47,557 47,789 53,230 5,673 11.9% 0.8%
Imperial Beach . 3,849 4,019 4,212 S63 9.4% 0.6%
La Me.. 26,848 26,793 28,419 1,571 5.9% 0.4%
Lamon Grove 7,972 8,059 8,463 491 6.2% 0.4%
Nationa' C~y 31,913 32,094 33,880 1,967 6.2% 0.4%
Oceanside 33,128 35,694 44,077 10,949 33.1% 1.9%
Poway 12,068 13,478 17,156 5,088 42.2% 2.4%
San Diego 678,651 682,641 739,884 81,233 9.0% 0.6%
San Marcos 25,289 26,847 32,129 6,840 27.0% 1.6%
Santee 16.161 16,600 18,771 2,610 16.1% 1.0%
Solana Beach 8,293 8,308 8,727 434 5.2".4 0.3%
Vista 21,191 22,696 28,114 8,923 32.7% 1.9%
Unincorporated Area 120,850 124,830 141,947 21,097 17.5% 1.1%
San Diego Region 1.223,867 1,243,195 1,370,187 146,320 12.0% 0.8%
1990 - 2005 1990-2005
Channe AV;. Annual
80hara of Inlluence 1990 2QQQ ~ Absolute Percent % ChanAe
Chula Vista 53,089 54,998 80,834 7,745 14.6% 0.9%
EI Cajon 47,461 46,531 49,859 2,_ 5.1% 0.3%
Encinltas 24,486 24,537 26,040 1,564 6.3% 0.4%
EscOndido 51,050 51,137 &6,891 5,841 11.4% 0.7%
National City 32,127 32,306 34,092 1,165 8.1% 0.4%
Poway 12,068 13,478 17,156 5,088 42.2% 2.4%
San Marcos 26,998 28,493 33,828 8,830 26.3% 1.5%
Vista 24,670 26,022 31,589 8,919 28.0% 1.7%
. .
~
~
~
SANDAG
401 B STREET, SUITE 800, SAN DIEGO CA 92101
(619) 595-5300
Sources: Employment Estimates, EDO (re-.ed SIll2); Series I Regional Growlh Fo_t, BANOAG
6 /5'-//
07/12/84
.
ATTACHMENT B
LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT OF THE
REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
.
.
/5'-/;L
.
'.
.
ATTACHMENT B
"
Sa Dir&o "--:.tWo f1l Gcmn.mts
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
July 22, 1994
AGENDA REPORT No.:
14-07.1 5
Action Requested: RECOMMEND APPROVAL
BY THE \;Uu;S
AND THE COtlNTY
LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT OF 1HE
REGIONAL GROW1H MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
Introduction
The Regional Growth Management Strategy gives local jurisdictions and other agencies the
forum to work together to manage the region's growth. The Land Use Distribution Element of
the strategy identifies the things they can do together to make travel more CODveuient within and
between communities. In addition, by increasing the intensity of new development in areas with
good transit service, the Element would accommodate projected growth and preserve regional
open space, problems identified in the Series 8 growth forecasts.
The Land Use Distribution Element establishes access standards - mayimum travel times and
distances - to measure travel convenience in the region. To improve the convenience of travel,
the Element addresses design, intensity and distribution of urban communities. 1be Element
defmes the relationship of the region's communities to the pl.,,""" transportation system, most
importantly, the growing transit system.
The Land Use Distribution Element was prepared by the Regional Growth Management
Technical Committee. The Element was evaluated as put of the rqional growth forecl..mg
process and during the preparation of the Regional Transportation Plan (adopted in Febnwy
1~4). It is the Committee's and my
RECOMMENDATION
that the Boan:I of Directors recommend that the cities and the County:
a. approve the Land Use Distribution Element, and
. b. implement the land use actions through changes in their general and community plans.
/~D
;'1"
'-l
\j
"
Discussion
~
Implementation of the Land Use Distribution Element would provide the region's residents the
options needed to change their ttavel behavior over time. It would restrUcture growth to
improve the region's quality of life as described in the Regional Growth Management Sttategy.
The Element achieves its goals by:
1. focusing new growth within walking distance of major transit services,
2. providing mixed-use districts as the centers of the region's communities,
3. providing residential uses within major employment areas, and
4. providing safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access.
By implementing the Land Use Distribution Element, the cities and the County would reduce
daily vehicle trips by 427,000 in the year 2015, daily vehicle miles of ttavel by 4,043,000, and
increase daily transit ridership by 28,000 when compared with existing general and community
plans. Most of the region's residents would ttavel shorter distances in less time to get to jobs,
shopping and services.
The forecasted consumption of vacant land could be reduced by more than 80,000 acres. This
decrease would be achieved primarily by increasing the average density of newly developing and
redeveloping residential land from 5.9 housing uniu per acre to 6.6 uniu per acre.
The Land Use Distribution Element was prepared by the Technical Committee to address the
jobs/housing balance in the region, as required by the Regional Planning and Growth Control ~
Measure (Proposition C of 1988). Jobs/housing balance is addressed by establishing maximum
ttavel time and distance (or access) standards for the home to work trip. The Element also
addresses access to shopping and services because these types of trips represent the great
majority of dailyttavel.
The goals, objectives, policies, and actions of the Land Use Distribution Element, which also
was designed as the region's Indirect Source Control progmn required by the California Clean
AM Act, are described in the attachment. Implementation by the cities and the County would
be reported and monitored through the Regional Growth Management Strategy se1f-certification
process.
ICBNNETH E. SUI..ZBR
Executive Director
Attachment
Key Staff Contact: George Franck, 595-5378
Funds are budgeted in Overall Work Progmn 1105.15
'"""'"
2 /y/tj
.
.
.
Attachment
LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
REGIONAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
July 22, 1994
The purpose of the Regional Growth Management Strategy is to identify the actions we should
take to protect and improve our quality of life. Private and public sector actions should help
make life in this growing region more convenient for all of us, and help us do the right thing
for the regio~ and all of its inhabitants.
The Land Use Distribution Eement addresses the location, intensity and design of urban
communities, and the relationship of these communities to the planned transportation system.
The intent of this element is to improve the region's planning process and to provide guidelines
for changes in the cities' and the County's general and community plans. Over time, these
changes would provide the option for the region's residents to change their travel behavior.
These changes would also allow the region to accommodate its anticipated population growth
over the next 20 years.
GOALS
The following Goals are established for the Land Use Distribution Eement:
MAXIMIZE ACCESS TO JOBS, SHOPPING AND SERVICES. AS MEASURED IN
TRAVELTIME, COST AND DISTANCE . 'l'llROUGH THE DISTRlBunON AND
DESIGN OF FVTURE DEVELOPMENT.
PROVIDE SumCIENT URBAN LAl'Io'D TO ACCOMMODATE FORECASTED
POPULATION GROwm WHILE PRESERVING ADEQUATE LAND FOR OPEN
SPACE.
INTRODUCTION
During the 1980's, travel in metropolitan areas grew 10 quickly that today, DUmeroUS federa1
and state laws and regulations require localgovemments and regional .,encies to deal directly
with traffic congestion and the land use patterns which help create that COIlJestion.
California law DOW requires the adoption of a Congestion Management ~O&ram (CYP) at the
regional level. The CYP establishes minimum IeMce levels 01\ freeways and ~or ftlIds, and
requires local .,encies to take direct action to maintain mobility in their jurisdictions. Both state
and federal law require local and regional .,encies to prepare and imp1emet\t plans to improve
air quality through controls on automobile travel.
3
/5'//.5
,
,
A),
, \
/
..
In addition, the California Clean Air Act requires an .Indirect Source Control Program. to
minimize air pollution through land use actions. The best way to implement such a program is '1
to build in long term land use changes in the general plans of local jurisdictions. This Land Use
Distribution Element is designed to help create these long term changes and, therefore, to serve
as the region's Indirect Source Control Program.
The conventional way in which we locate our homes, businesses and public bl!ildings has been
a major contributor to traffic congestion and poor air quality. Further, the design of our newer
neighborhoods has also forced most of us to make nearly all of our trips, and our children's
trips, by car. Congestion could be reduced if there were a better balance of jobs and housing
in each community, or if, by some other means, we could make travel easier.
On average, the work trip is the longest daily trip which most of us make. But work trips
represent only about 20% of the trips made on a normal workday, and nearly half of these work
trips are made during off-peak periods. While a community balance of jobs and appropriately
priced housing could lessen congestion, this balance would not solve all of the mobility problems
we face. To address the full range of mobility needs, the Land Use Distribution Element
addresses shopping and service trips as well as work trips.
In addition, the currently adopted general and community plans do not accommodate the region's
projected residential growth beyond the year 2005. Most of the land planned for urban
residential use would be developed by the year 2005 under current plans, leaving very few acres
available for habitat conservation and regional recreation uses.
"""'
SUMMARY OF THE LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
This Land Use Distribution Element includes goals, objectives, policies, and actions to help the
region accommodate the forecasted population growth and improve traffic congestion and air
quality. The regional access objectives, shown in Table A, define a maximum acceptable travel
time and distance for work trips, as well as those other trips which are made to satisfy our
shopping, recreation and service needs.
The transportation elements of the Regional Growth Management Strategy already identify many
of the actions needed to help meet the access objectives. These include new and improved
facilities identified in the Regional Transportation Plan, and congestion DIlUIIIement initiatives
identified in the region's Congestion Management Program. In addition, adopted air quality
Transportation Control Measures include programs which will help create alternatives to linile-
occupant automobile travel.
Improvements to the transportation system alone will not allow us to meet the lqionallCCeSS
objectives. Land use actions are needed, too. Therefore, the Land Use Distribution Element
recommends that new OfflCe, residential and other development be focused around IIil transit
stations and in major bus corridors. By focusing development in mixed use centers, more trips
will be able to be made by transit, walking and bicycling. Local trips can be consolidated, the """"
4 iY/?
.
.
.
potential use of shoner-range alternative fuel vehicles can be increased and some trips can be
eliminated through the increased use of electronic travel substitutes.
Appropriate design is required to make the focusing of development work. Therefore, the Land
Use Distribution Element recommends the preparation of design guidelines which identify
desirable design characteristics of development, buildings and public facilities (including streets,
sidewalks and bicycle routes).
Existing employment areas, which are outside of potential transit focus areas, also should be
planned to include a residential clement. As long as environmental conditions do not prevent
residential uses, major employment areas should accommodate appropriately priced housing and
support facilities to meet the needs of some of the employees working in these areas. The
streets within these employment areas should provide for transit, bicycle and pedestrian
circulation as well as automobile travel.
With increased intensities and mixed-use development in transit focus areas, the land proposed
for urbanization in current general and community plans would more than accommodate the
projected population growth. Vacant land also would remain for regional recreation and natural
habitat preservation.
The concepts contained in this Land Use Distribution Element were evaluated as a part of the
regional growth forecasting process. This evaluation indicated that, when compared with
adopted general and community plans, the implementation of these concepts would require the
use of significantly fewer acres of vacant land to accommodate the region's forecasted population
growth. It also would reduce both the number of trips made in the region and the total volume
of automobile travel, as well as provide some improvement in m quality. The Land Use
Distribution Element would help the region achieve its quality of life standards and objectives
for transportation, air quality, access, and open space.
The ideas contained in this strategy are not new. They are an inte&ral part of the adopted Otay
Ranch Plan, MTDB's Transit Development Guidelines, the County's Transportation Demand
Management Program and the City of San Diego's Land Guidance Proaram.
/5- /?
5
,
! ,/
,"
OBJECTIVES
-...
Objective 1: Average travel times and distances for home-based trips in aU parts of the
region should be no greater than those shown in Table A.
TABLE A
REGIONAL ACCESS OBJECTIVES
AREAfI'ravel Mode TRAVELTIME TRAVEL DISTANCE
Minutes Miles
URBAN AREAS Work Other Work Other
Automobile 19 10 10.6 5.1
Transit 50 35 11.0 7.5
RURAL AREAS
Automobile 60 20 19.4 12.0
In addition to the quality of life standards and objectives that have been adopted for
transportation and air quality. the Land Use Distribution Element establishes access objectives
for maximum average travel times and distances for work trips and other trips from or to the
home. Objectives are provided for both transit and automobile trips in urban areas and for """
automobile trips in rural areas.
The access objectives in Table A are based on forecasted 2015 travel times and distances for the
urban and rural zones shown on Figure 1. The travel time and distance are based on
approximately 60% of the zones meeting the objectives if the region developed under current
general plan and transportation policies.
The policies and actions in this Land Use Distribution Element are designed to help the entire
region achieve these access objectives within the 2o-year time-frame of the Regional
Transportation Plan and regional growth forecasts.
Achievement of these objectives would ensure that all residents of the region would have
equitable access to jobs, shopping and services regardless of where they live. Because of
multiple-worker households, home ownership or other factors, some of the region's residents
will continue to commute long distances. Individual mismatches of jobs and housing will
inevitably occur; however, the opportunity would exist to work, shop and receive services near
home.
-...
6 1Y/%
"
.
~z
.
.
/5//;
, e~
J J I ~e
I J . i ~ I Jil
o 0 i~i Itj~/
(",.t,
\':1 ,-
.
Objective 2: Adequate 'Vacant land should be preserved to accommodate habitat
conservation areas and a full range of open space opportunities.
~
The Open Space Element of the Regional Growth Management Strategy is being prepared based
on the need for recreation areas as well as natural habitat preservation. A policy and actions
promoting Sensitive Lands and Open Space Preservation and Protection were adopted as a part
of the Phase 1 Regional Growth Management Strategy in 1993. This policy is being refined,
and additional actions will be proposed as part open space planning efforts.
Habitat conservation plans arc being prepared based on an extensive data collection, mapping
and evaluation effort. Although many general and community plans preserve a portion of the
existing habitat areas, it is anticipated that the habitat plans will require additional preservation
of land planned for urbanization. Additional land also should be reserved for other open space
needs identified in SANDAG's open space planning studies. Once these plans arc defined, this
goal can be quantified.
POLICIES
Land use policies will help the region achieve the goals and objectives of the Land Use
Distribution Element.. In addition. related transportation policies also will be needed if the
objectives are to be realized.
~
Land Use Policies:
The following land use policies, if implemented by the cities and the County, would result in
a better balance of residential, employment, commercial and institutional uses in the region's
major travel corridors. Implementation of these policies would make it easier for the region's
residents to avoid unnecessary travel and would help preserve an adequate amount of vacant land
for habitat preservation and recreation.
1. Transportation facilities should be desiped to meet the Deeds of pedestrians and
bicycle riders as well as automobile drivers.
Circulation Elements of local general plans should emphasize pedestrian and bicycle
facilities for trips within communities. Direct pedestrian access should be provided to
mnsit stations and within mnsit corridors.
Street design can playa significant role in increasing pedestrian, bicycle and mnsit trips
throughout the region. In transit focus areas, pedestrian travel should JeQCivc priority.
To make walking easier, major streets in all areas should be as 1l8JJOW as possible, while
Itill accommodating emergency vehicle, bus and automobUc circulation. The provision
of medians on major streets is another way to facilitate pedestrian movement.
Local general and community plans should also provide for streets and roads which ~
connect communities, reducing the need to use the region's freeways for relatively short
8
l5- 04:/
.
.
.
trips. These local streets and roads also facilitate more direct automobile and bus transit
access.
2. Higber land use intensities should be located in transit access areas.
The highest employment intensities and residential densities permitted in the region
should be located in major bus transit corridors (Figure 2) and within walking distance .
about 1/4 mile - of planned rail transit stations (Figure 3). To insure sufficient ridership
potential in major bus transit corridors and near the stations, a minimum average net
density of 20 housing units per acre is desirable.
Within a quarter mile of rail transit stations, average employment intensities should be
at least 60 workers per acre (a floor area ratio of approximately 0.50). In major bus
corridors, average employment intensities should be at least 45 workers per acre (a floor
area ratio of approximately 0.35). Where current economic conditions do not permit
development at these intensities, site plans should be designed to allow for a higher
density on the project site in the future. For example, surface parking could be planned
for future conversion to structured parking and additional economic uses, including
housing.
Implementation of this action would require most jurisdictions to change their general or
community plans. Outside of downtown San Diego and several other major activity
centers, the employment intensities proposed in general and community plans are
relatively low.
This intensification could occur either by (a) a balance for the lowering of proposed
intensities in areas that are not served by a high level of transit service to balance
intensities or (b) increasing the permitted amount of development in a jurisdiction. The
second of these alternatives is preferable if the second regional objective (of open space
preservation) is to be achieved. However, local jurisdictions should make this decision
based on the needs of the community.
3. Mixed-use development should be encOUr8&ed in commuDlty ceater areas, indudiD&
the areas surrounding ran transit stations and within the bus transit corrldon.
Within the transit focus areas, a higher intensity mix of residential, employment,
shopping and service uses should be required. Allowin& residential uses above the
&round floor also should be considered for existin& commercial areas. Tbese mixed-use
areas will permit many of the local trips to be made by foot or bicyc:1e, InCI will make
pedestrian access to transit stops more convenient.
/y~/
9
''\
/
\ ,'1
\
---.-/
~
i
-.
-
""'"
".ure2
BUS TRANSIT FOCUS AREAS
_ __c.._
. T_-"
,
.
.....
.
""'"
10
..... ..c.
/5" cJ-;L
6
~_ tlIc,o
ASSOCIATION OF
GO\"EllNME!<:TS
='
,
'-
.
~
~
.
-.
-
.
,
~.
,
"
....... S
lWL TIWtIIT FOCUS AREAS
. __.-..-IT_c.........
O__._T__
o
.
....
.
,..., a.c.
/
_ 6 ,~f\;
~.... DIqo
AS5"':\A nON OF
GO\'BaIOa""TS
)yd- )
..
..
Mixed use development also is appropriate for community centers which are outside of ~
the transit focus areas, because it provides the opportunity to consolidate trips and 1
encourages walking trips. These community center areas are located in several of the
suburban cities, as well as rural communities. As these centers intensify and add
JeSidential uses, they may become appropriate locations for future transit facilities.
It is recognized that not all transit stations are suitable for higher intensity, mixed use
development. For example, a rail station located within the influence area of an airport
may have intensity limits that are below those recommended in this Element. Similarly,
some station areas may not be suitable for JeSidential development because of noise
impacts from airports or from adjacent freeway facilities.
.
4. A mix of housing types and prices should be provided within W811<11I& distance of
transit stations and in transit corridors.
This mix of housing should include small-lot single family units, town houses and
apartments. This mix would provide for a range of housing opportunities in each
community, and help each jurisdiction achieve the goals in the Regional Housing Needs
Statement. The higher density, more affordable housing in the transit corridors would
be balanced against the larger lot developments located farther from the station.
s.
More intensively used public facilities should be located Dear transit stations and
stops, within walking or biking distance of the cOlDDlunltles they serve.
'"""
Libraries, urban parks, hospitals, churches and most civic buildings are examples of
more intensively used public facilities. The location of the more intensively used public
facilities in the denser areas near high level transit service will increase the opportunity
for people to travel to these facilities by walking, riding a bike and transit. In rural
areas, this type of public facility should also be located within commercial centers.
Public facilities which require more land, such as schools and active recreation sites,
should be located near the edges of the mixed-use transit focus areas, adjacent to lower
density residential uses.
6. Parking requirements should be reduced within transit locus areas, with olHtreet
parking provided in the mixed-use community core areas, wbeaever pncclhle.
In anticipation of decreased automobile use, the lowering of parking requirements should
be considered in coordination with the adoption of transportation demand manaaement
programs. The lower parking requirement would lower costs and provide an incentive
to develop near the transit stations and in transit corridors.
On-street parking in the transit focus areas helps to c:reate a more walkable environment
by separating the pedestrian from vehicular traffic. When on-street parking is not
possible, pedestrians should be separated from vehicular traffic by landscaping or other """
suitable barrier. 1
12 /~c;)1
"
.
7. Residential uses should be Incorporated Into exlstln& employment areas that are
located outside of the transit focus areas.
Local general and community plans should permit appropriately sited residential uses
within WCe employment areas that are not provided with a high level of transit service,
unless potential environmental hazards exist. An objective of providinc housing for the
workers employed in the area should be established in the general planninC process.
The potential price range of this housing should be based on the types of employment in
the area. The general plan also should ensure the adequate provision of public facilities,
including schools and recreation areas.
8.
DesiCn pidelines should be used to encoura&e the development of traDslt- and
pedestrian-friendly communities.
.
Local jurisdictions should adopt design cuidelines for new and redeveloping areas. These
cuidelines should emphasize non-automobile travel, permittinc more convenient access
by pedestrians, bicyclists and transit riders. It is expected that these cuidelines will be
based on the extensive planninc work already completed by severalloc:al jurisdictions in
the region. Model guidelines could be developed by the Regional Growth Management
Technical Committee, if needed.
While design guidelines are needed most in the transit focus areas, they also should
address the design of lower density areas as well. In the areas surroundinc the transit
focus areas (between one-quarter and two miles from transit stations or ~or bus
corridors), pedestrian and bicycle linkages also are needed. These linka&es would
provide for both internal circulation and access to the transit focus areas. Even in rural
communities, appropriate desiCn would reduce the need for automobile travel.
9. Lower land use intensities should be located In areas with low tents or transit
services or no transit services.
.
In areas that are not proposed for a high level of transit service, hi&her intensity
development should be discouraced. for example, new development on conventional
sinCle family lots should be located beyond waDdn& distance of rail transit stations or
~or bus corridors. In auto-oriented areas, intalsities should be established that will
not diminish hiihway Jevels of service below those Idopted in the Rqional Growth
Mana&ement Suate&y and Coniestion Manaiement PIoJrIm. <- pile 12 and 13).
Particularly for employment areas. locaIllenc:ies should IeYiew ~oposed intendti~ of
areas that are not in transit focus areas. Many of tbe planned employment areas in the
leJion have low development intensities and therefore are difficult to serve with transit.
In those areas, employment intensities should be reduced to I Jevel that would DOt have
an adverse impact on the legion's hi&hway system or p.O}IOIed land uses should be
chanCed to permit an appropriate level of residential development.
;Y~3
13
",,4
,
Transit corridor planning considers, and should continue to consider, the location of ~,
major activity centers within the region. High levels of transit service should not be
planned for open space and sensitive habitat areas.
Ilelated TraDSportation Policies
In order to achieve the access objectives of the Land Use Distribution Element, a combination
of land use and transportation policies and actions will be required. In addition to the land use
policies listed above, a range of transportation agency policies and actions also are important in
improving travel time.
The following policies are drawn from other elements of the Regional Growth Management
Strategy and the Regional Transportation Plan. Actions to implement these policies also are
contained in those elements or the Regional Transportation Plan. The related transportation
policies are listed below to acknowledge the important relationship of land use and transportation
programs in achieving regional objectives.
1. Trame now improvements.
Through the adoption of the Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Plan, the region
has committed to making a substantial improvement in the optimization of traffic signals
to reduce congestion, energy use and improve air quality. Approximately half of the
region's 2,000 signals have been coordinated or optimized through an existing State- ~
funded program, with all signals scheduled for optimization by the year 2000.
Traffic flow improvements are the most cost-effective TCM evaluated as part of the air
quality planning program. Because they tend to decrease travel times, they are criticized
for potentially increasing trip distances and even inducing additional automobile trips.
Nevertheless, traffic flow improvements are included in the Air Quality TCM's and
Congestion Management Plan.
2.
TraDSit improvements and expaDSion.
--
This measure expands the 2G-year Regional Transportation Plan and the seven-year Short
Range Transit Plans of the region's two transit development boards. The measure
consists of the conversion of the current bus fleet to low emission vehicles, the expansion
of bus services, and the expansion of the rail transit services. The lack of operating
funds for transit service expansion remains a major problem in the implementation of this
policy.
Transportation System Manalement (priority treatments).
Transit will be given priority as a part of the proposed traffic now improvements through
traffic signal preemption, signal timing and the designation of special lanes for transit
use. Within the transit focus areas, traffic flow improvements should include the """
consideration of pedestrian and bicycle travel. On many freeways and some arterial
3.
14 IY c2&
.
.
. 1.
"
4.
streets, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes will decrease travel times for transit riders
and carpool users. These priority treatments are included in the Regional Transportation
Plan, Air Quality TCM's and Congestion Management Plan.
TelecommutiDl, home-based sboppiDl and other tecbnoloak:al alternatives to the
linlle-occupant automobile trip.
Electronic communication provides a convenient alternative to many of the work,
shopping and service trips which most people make today. Alternatives to physical travel
should be encouraged, but specific lovemmental action is not recommended at this time.
Telecommuting is a permitted tactic in the regional trip recluction program which is part
of the TCM Plan.
S.
Market-based stratelies to reduce automobile travel.
Strategies that require auto drivers to pay more of the true cost of automobile travel
should result in shorter trips for employment, shopping and services. As part of the Air
Quality TCM's, SANDAG has adopted mileage- and pollution-based vehicle registration
fees as the region's primary .market-based" strategy for decreasing automobile travel.
Increased registration fees effectively increase the cost of automobile travel for the
region's residents, encouraging them to find alternative travel modes.
Market-based strategies are being evaluated through a Statewide study. The
Transportation Control Measures Plan will be reviewed periodically and when other
options are available, such as market-based measures, it can be revised accordingly.
ACTIONS
The following actions would implement the land use distribution policies listed above (policies
1-9). Actions to implement the related transportation policies are contained in the Re&ional
Transportation Plan and other elements of the Regional Growth Management Strate&y. These
actions also will help monitor the achievement of the two objectives of the Land Use Distribution
:Element.
The -Transit Focus Areas. identified in the followinl actions are defined u areas with a high
lCvel of transit service. These areas include major bus corridors (shown in Fipre 2) IJId areas
within walkinl distance of existina and planned rail transit ltalions (shown in Fipre 3 u
Rqional Transit Corridors - Station Areas). Fiaure 3 also identifies -Potential Transit Corridors
- Station Areas. referrecl to in action 10.
CitIes and the County
During the comprehensive update of the land use, open space IJId transportation elements
of &eneral or community plans, the cities and the County will:
IS
/y~)
,
''vP1
\ '
\ '
a.
consider at least one alternative that would increase the intensity of development
in the transit focus areas,
1
b. consider at least one alternative that would encourage the development of mixed-
use community cores in the transit focus areas and other community centers,
c. consider at least one alternative that would decrease moderate and high intensity
development in areas which are not located in transit focus areas,
d. consider at least one alternative that would encourage the development of housing
and appropriate support facilities in employment areas of more than 1,000 acres,
. and
e. adopt all reasonable changes to bring their updated general and community plan
elements into conformance with the Land Use Distribution Element, provided that
adequate public facilities (including schools and local parks) are available or
programmed to support these changes.
2. The cities and the County will encourage the implementation of the Land Use
Distribution Element through the discretionary review of projects required by existing
plans and ordinances.
3.
The cities and the County, with the assistance of SANDAG, will evaluate the potential
impacts of land use alternatives that increase intensities and encourage mixed use
communities in the transit focus areas.
')
4. The cities and the County will monitor the consumption of total vacant land and vacant
land with high habitat value within its jurisdiction.
S. In implementing their general and community plans, the cities and the County will
consider zoning classifications and subdivision regulations that encourage mixed use
developments and higher intensities in transit focus areas and other community core
areas.
6. In implementing their general and community plans, the cities and the County will
consider changes to their street and road standards that are consistent with the policies
of this Land Use Distribution Element.
7. In implementing their leneral and community plans, the cities and the County will
prepare or consider changes to their design luidelines for development that are """eluent
with the policies of this Land Use Distribution Element.
San Dieco Association of Governments
8.
SANDAG will monitor the average travel times and distances for the IS Travel Corridor
Zones.
""""
16 Jye2'6
.
.
.
9. SANDAG will provide the cities and the County with model zoning codes, design
guidelines, subdivision ordinances and street design guidelines which are in conformance
with the Land Use Distribution Element policies.
Transit Development Boards, SANDAG, the County, and Affected Cities
10. The transit development boards, SANDAG and the affected cities will evaluate the
potential of transit service improvements in conjunction with increased land use
intensities and mixed-use development in the five potential regional transit corridors
identified in Figure 3.
11. The County and affected cities will complete the multiple species habitat conservation
plans and incorporate those plans into the general and community plans.
) 5<.2(
\~t)
17
,
..
.
.
'.
MAJOR QUESTIONS
Regional Growth Forecast and
land Use Distribution Element
October 13, 1994
IS THE SERIES 8 REGIONWIDE GROWI'H FORECAST ACCURATE?
WHAT LAND USE POLICIES SHOULD BE USED TO ACCOMMODATE THE
FORECASTED GROWI'H?
CAN THE REGION ACCOMMODATE ANTICIPATED GROWI'H AND THE
REQUIREMENTS OF A NATURAL HABITAT PRESEERVE SYSTEM?
HOW CAN WE PROVIDE ADEQUATE LOCAL FACILITIES TO SERVE EXISTING AND
FUTURE POPULATION?
WHAT CAN BE DONE IF VOTER-APPROVED GROWI'H ORDINANCPS RESTRICT
GENERAL PLAN CHANGES?
WHAT IS THE FISCAL IMPACT ON CITIES AND THE COUNTY OF PLANNING FOR
ADDmONAL RESIDENTIAL GROWI'H IN PLACE OF EMPLOYMENT GROWI'H?
/5-- 3D
INDIVIDUAL COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS
l
Regional Growth Forecast and
Land Use Distribution E.ement
October 10, 1994
REGIONWIDE FORECAST
What is the accuracy of previous SANDAG forecasts'? (SDIIBIDM)
SANDAG's forecast is too high because of current economic conditions'? (DM/IB/CPC)
What is the impact of the recession on the forecast'? (IB)
The Economic Prosperity forecast is not based in reality. (IB)
Forecasts are self-fulfilling prophesies. (IB)
Citizens don't want growth. (V)
How is illegal immigration handled'? (IB)
Population growth is primarily the result of employment growth. (CV)
The type of employment growth is important. (DMlCPC)
Higher ethnic birth rates moderate over time. (CV)
People often move away from their birthplace. (SD)
What is the 2020/2040 forecast'? (CV)
What is the region's buildout'? (CPC)
Will growth still be faster in North County'? (CV)
What is the schedule for Series 9'? (IB)
What happens when residential capacity is reached'? (SD)
""""
LOCAL JURISDICTION FORECAST
The forecast "mandates" that cities accommodate housing. (PIIB)
Why does population grow at a faster rate than housing'? (DM)
Incorrect vacancy rate invalidates the forecast. (IB)
The Avai1ablitiy of land for development should be considered in the forecast. (IB)
Transportation models don't account for larger household size when generating trips. (CV)
What assumptions were made for FUA, Otay Ranch and military bases'? (CV/CPC)
The forecast should address socio-economic impacts. (CPC)
Growth in one jurisdiction will have impacts outside its boundaries. (SD)
Underestimates of growth would result in inadequate public facilities. (SD)
1
2
~31
.
.
.
'\
EXISTING GENERAlJCOMMUNITY PLAN
Cities must maintain local control. (V)
The existing Gen~ Plan is a commitment to the people. (P)
A General Plan which was adopted recently should not change. (SB)
A plan which incorporates light rail station planning helps transit funding. (CV)
The region bas over-planned for employment growth. (CV)
Current Plans are strongly influence by local agency revenue needs. (IB)
The current Plan supports the Land Use Element concepts. (COR)
Height limits should be maintained. (P)
LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
Local growth caps limit some cities ability to implement the proposed Land Use Element. (V)
Mixed use in town centers is a good idea. (DM/COR)
Financing mixed-use development is difficult. (SD)
Conversion of employment land near stations is an issue. (V)
People want to live in single family homes. (SD)
Numerically balancing jobs and housing does not work. (DM)
This concept may be inconsistent with the Local Coastal Plan objectives. (SB)
Increased density is a difficult issue. (SB)
The type and density of housing in market-driven. (SD)
Good pedestrian facilities are needed in station areas. (SB)
Narrower streets are a good idea. (SB)
Higher intensities worsen local street congestion. (CV)
Transit travel time objectives should be closer to automobile travel time objectives. (CPC)
How were urban and rural areas defined'? (SD)
There are higher crime rates in high density areas. (IB)
Higher density areas have higher public costs. (P)
Infrasttu~re improvements should come before intensities are increased. (CPC)
Forcing development back into central areas makes sense. (CV)
Densities of 20 DU/Acre will not support light rail. (CPC)
How can additional services be provided as existing communities redevelop. (CV)
Poor schools are an impediment to the redevelopment of central areas. (CV)
It is too easy to subdivide for large lot development. (CV)
Additional residential "'lp"clty should be provided in newly developing areas. (IBlCPC)
The Land Use Distribution concept is appe"lil\g, but implementation is difficult. (SD)
OTHER DEVELOPMENT PA1TERNS
What is the region 'a holding <:ap"city'1 (CV)
Are there other way to accommodate the region's growth'? (CV)
3 /~3:2.-
OPEN SPACE
""'"
How can open space be preserved'? (V)
The current amount of open space per resident is adequate. (V)
Additional taxes to pay for open space is not acceptable. (V)
Are the Habitat studies integrated into the forecast'? (CV)
Conversion of rural lands should be minimized. (DM)
TRANSPORTATION PLAN
Light rail should serve the beach communities. (IB, PB)
Rail service in needed in MidCity, bus fumes are unhealthy. (CPC)
The Trolley is tourist oriented. It does not serve residents. (CPC)
When will the non-TransNet transit corridors be built'? (CV)
Why aren't more advanced transit technologies being considered'? (CV)
How is trans-border traffic forecasted'? (CV)
GENERAUOTHER
SANDAG has identified an issue which should be dealt with. (SD)
It is important to look to the future. (SB)
Education should be a quality of life factor. (P)
How is smog transport (from Los Angeles) accounted for'? (CV)
Impact fees are needed to fund regional facilities. (IB)
Higher gasoline prices are needed. (CPC)
SANDAG/MTDB are controlled by the City of San Diego" developers (IB)
"""\
I
,
l
4
/5- J .J
.
ATTACHMENT C
EXCERPT FRO~MINUTES OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
MEETING OF 9/26/94
Resource Conservation Commission
PaJte 2
3. Regional Transportation Improvement Program was summarized by Mr. Nuhaily of the
Engineering Department. Hall asked if the businesses along the proposed routes would
be assessed, and why these particular projects are being done now when other roads are
in worse condition. Mr. Nuhaily stated businesses would not be assessed since the
improvements would benefit the general public. He further explained that after Proposi-
tion A's pa~""ge of the !he sales tax in 1987 to improve the roads, these particular
projects had been identified and were just continuing on. Hall also asked if the funding
was from the 125 toll road. Mr. Nuhaily stated those were different funds and TransNet
funds are meant for the work on the specifically named streets on this project. On a side
note, he also explained the difference of the ISTEA funds.
Fisher commented on the Otay Valley Road bridge which supports truck traffic through
San Diego. Marquez noted that for fiscal 1994-1995 these projects went through without
comments from RCC. Mr. Nuhaily added that the bridge that recently washed out is
being repaired through this funding as well, although it was not specifically stated in the
plans before.
.
4. Negative Declaration IS-95-o1, The Sports Authority. A motion was made and seconded
(HaI1IMarquez) to accept the negative declaration; vote: 5-0, motion carried.
5. Review of Planning Commission for September 28, 1994. (2A) GPA-94-04/PCZ-94-C:
the representative was ill and unavailable to explain the project. (2B) Chula Vista Local
Coastal Program and Bayfront SPA: no action taken. (3) PCM-94-20/PCA-94-02: The
Landscape Manual is exempt from environmental review; no action taken.
6. Since the forecasted population exceeded the forecast by the General Plan, increased
densities of other proposed projects was made. It was moved and seconded (Hall/Fisher)
to recommend approva1 of '14 of the Regional Growth Forecast (motion carried 5-0).
It was moved and seconded (HaI1IMarquez) to recommend approva1 of '15 of the land
use distribution element; additional recommendations were made by Marquez to include
into the motion and accepted by Hall: (a) plan for new school zones in the areas which
may be impacted or designated with a higher density; and (b) reconsider locating schools
within the center of a high density population rather than the outer edges where traffic
would increase to bus children to school; motion carried 5-0.
Another motion was made and seconded (BurrascanolHall) to consider adding more park
space in the western side of the city where there will be increased residential population;
motion carried 5-0.
Hall further recommended that the City stay away from high rises over three stories.
Reid explained current zoning in some areas which already include multi-level structures.
Jy3~
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT D
Excerpt from Draft Planninl! Commission Minutes of 10/26/94
OTHER
RECOMMENDATION TO CITY COUNCIL ON SANDAG'S DRAFT SERIES 8
POPULATION AND HOUSING FORECAST AND LAND USE DISTRIBUTION ELEMENT
Associate Planner Batchelder gave a brief staff report, noting that a workshop had been held
with a presentation from SANDAG staff. Based on that, staff had outlined some staff comments
about the Forecast and the Land Use Distribution Element. He asked that the Planning
Commission take a formal motion to recommend that the Council endorse the SANDAG Series
8 Population and Housing Forecast and Land Use Distribution Element consistent with the staff
comments.
MSC (Fuller/Salas) 6-0 (Commissioner Tuchscher excused) that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the SANDAG Draft Series 8 Population and Housing Forecast and
Land Use Distribution Element documents to the City Council, subject to staff comments.
J~~3?
Byline:
Dateline:
..
UNION-TRIBUNE
08-0ct-1994 Saturday
1,2,3,4,5,6,7
NEWS
A-3
High court to review
rejected law capping
RICHARD CARELLI
WASHINGTON
)71 CC1f(( ':"J
v', .-t
-.,-,' ,.;
~L :;~ >.,.. ~.
Paper Name:
Pub. Date:
Edition:
Section:
Page:
Headline:
welfare restriction I Lower courts
newcomers' aid
....
- ..
WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court will decide whether California and other
states may limit the benefits paid to some welfare recipients who have
lived there less than a year.
The court voted yesterday to review rulings that said a California law
imposing such limits violated new residents' constitutional right of
interstate travel.
Lawye7s for californ~a told t~e justices that a 1992 state law limiting
benef~ts un~er the A~d to Fam~lies with Dependent Children (AFDC) program
for new resJ.dents "does not operate as a penalty on migration" and should
be allowed.
But lawyers for welfare recipients urged the court to reject the state's
appeal and preserve Ha quarter-century of this court's precedents on
residency discrimination."
The 1992 law, part of an effort to cut spending in the face of a state
budget crunch, limited applicants receiving AFDC benefits who had not lived
in California for the 12 preceding months to the amount their family was
entitled to in their prior state.
State officials said the law would save California $8.4 million in fiscal
year 1992-93 and $22.5 million in 1993-94.
For individual families, the law would have cut benefits by up to 80
percent for their first year in california.
For example, a family of four moving to california from Mississippi would
receive only $144 a month for the first year instead of the standard
California AFDC benefit of $743.
Three welfare recipients challenged the law in behalf of all new residents
eligible for AFDC benefits. The lawsuit said the residency law violated
their fundamental constitutional right to travel.
A federal judge barred enforcement of the law, ruling that "the state's
interest in reducing welfare costs is not sufficient to justify the
disparate treatment of this class of needy residents."
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld that ruling last April.
California's appeal contended that past SUpreme Court rulings banning
states from discriminating against new residents involved permanent -- not
temporary -- distinctions based on length of state residency.
Those past rulings, the appeal said, do not bar states from giving "new
residents the same level of welfare benefits they would have received in
their st~te of prior residence for a limited period of time."
The appeal was supported in a friend-of-the-court brief submitted by the
conservative Washington Legal Foundation, 20 state legislators and three
Republican congressmen from California -- Michael Buffington, Stephen Horn
and Richard Pombo. If a.. -/