Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1996/04/10 (3) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT ItemJX Meeting Date: April 10. 1996 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing. PCA 96-02. Consideration of an amendment to the Planned Community (PC) Zone. Public Hearing: PCA 96-03 City of Chula Vista Municipal (PQ) Zone. Consideration of an amendment to the Code to create the Public/Quasi-Public Public Hearing PCZ 96-A Application of said modified Planned Community (PC) Zone by prezoning eertam parcels of land within Planning Areas One and Three of the Chula Vista 1995 Sphere of Influence Update, prezoning the Otay Water District parcel to Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) and prezoning the Nelson/Sloan rock quarry property to Agriculture (A-8). Three related applications have been initiated by the City of Chula Vista as a result of non-Bald",n owned parcels being annexed into the City. These applications arc being processed in conjunction with Otay Ranch SPA One review. The first application (PCA 96-(2) involves an amendment to the Planned Community (PC) Zone, Section 19.48 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. The second application (PCA 96-03) proposes an amendment to the Chula Vista Municipal Code to create the Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) Zone. The third application (PCZ 96-A) involves applying this modified PC Zone and the newly created PQ Zone to miscellaneous publicly and non-Baldwin owned parcels described below and prezoning the existing Nelson/Sloan Rock Quarry to A-8. ISSUES: . Perceived downzoning associated with the prezoning of the Southwest Comer, Dauz and Groman properties . Creation of a new zone - the proposed Public/Quasi-Public Zone RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission conduct a public hearing on the proposed PC Zone amendment (PCA 96-02), the proposed creation of the Public/Quasi-Public Zone (PCA 96-03) and the prezoning of certain parcels ofland within Planning Areas One and Three of the Chula Vista 1995 Sphere ofInfluenee Update Study (PCZ 96-A); and Approve the attached Resolutions of Approval and forward said recommendations and attached draft Ordinances to the City Council. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None ~ ..:J Page 2, Item IX Meeting Date 411 0/96 DISCUSSION: 1. Amendment to Planned Community Zone (PCA 96-02) A. Background/ProposaL The primary purpose of the Planned Community (PC) Zone (Section 19.48 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code) is to provide for orderly planning and long-term development of large tracts of land in order to provide an environment of stable and desirable character, to provide the developer with reasonable assurances that sectional development plans will be acceptable to the City and to enable the City to adopt measures which provide for the development of the surrounding areas compatible with the Planned Community Zone. Implementation of the PC Zone is currently restricted to parcels of land under unified ownership and of 50 acres or more and requires the concurrent submittal of a General Development Plan (GDP). The current amendment (see Exhibit A) would allow parcels, which arc contiguous to existing GDPs and under or over 50 acres in size, to be zoned PC without the concurrent adoption of a GDP. Several parcels not owned by the Baldwin Company, but surrounded by the Otay Ranch, arc less than 50 acres in size, with one parcel larger, and are not a part of the Otay Ranch Project. The proposed modification to the PC Zone would enable the City to pre-zone these less than 50-acre parcels in connection with the annexation of the Otay Valley ParceL Additionally, the PC Zone amendment allows an underlying zone consistent with the general plan designation for those parcels which do not have, or wish to pursue, an approved GDP. The underlying land use zone would be determined at the time of prezoning. In order to develop their properties, the affected property owners of the noted parcels would have three options: I.) the owner could amend the adjacent GDP and annex to it in order to be part of the comprehensive Olay Ranch planning effort 2.) the owner could seck an underlying land use consistent with the City's General Plan designation for the site, or 3.) the owner could make an application to the City for a General Plan Amendment to change the PC zone to some other designation. B. Analvsis: The proposed amendment to the PC Zone would apply not only to the non-Olay Ranch parcels as noted specifically below, but would also apply City-wide since the amendment is to the City's Municipal Code, The amendment docs not undermine the intent of the PC Zone District and will most likely be applied on a limited basis in very specific circumstances. In order for these noted exceptions to apply, a parcel must not only be under 50 acres in size, but also must be surrounded by, or contiguous to, an existing adopted General Development Plan. The amendment would allow parcels to annex into an existing GDP and be part of a comprehensive planning effort, which would further the goals of the Planned Community Zone District. C. Issues. PCRPT410.DOC disc if3 4/5/96 o Page 3, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 No major issues have been identified with the proposed ZOnIng text amendments. Zoning text amendments have been addressed in the EIR for SPA One and Annexation (EIR 95- 01) and the EIR for the Sphere ofInfluenee Update (EIR 94-03) D. Conclusion; Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached ResolutIOn of Approval (PCA 96-02) and draft Ordinance and forward its recommendations to the Cm Council. 2, Creation of the Public/Quasi-Public Zone (PCA 96-03) A. Background/ProposaL The Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) Zone is being created (see ExhibIt B) in order to be applied as a prezoning to certain non-Otay Ranch parcels ofland, such as the Otay Water District and San Diego Reservoir parcels. The PQ Zone may also be applied in the future, as needed, for other public agencies land uses within the City. The PQ Zone will also address issues related to the landfill expansion should it be annexed to the City in the future. However, at this time, an agreement between the City and the County has been reached regarding the operating procedures for the landfiIl, and it will remain as a Special Study Area within the County. The proposed landfill agreement establishes specific regulations and guidelines addressing operations and the eventual elosure of the facility. The proposed PQ Zone also includes provisions for closure of the landfill in accordance with all applicable Federal, State and local regulations, including regulations of the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Waste Management Board and the Department of Health Services in the event the landfill were annexed to the City prior to closure. It should be noted that the proposed PQ Zone also includes water reservoirs and parks as a pennitted use. As noted bclow, the PQ Zone will be applied to non-Otay Ranch parecls of land (e.g., the City of San Diego water reservoir parecl and Otay Water District parecl) in advance of annexation. 8. Analvsis; The purpose of the PQ Zone is to provide for a limited number of unique land uses In appropriate locations which are maintained by public or publicly controlled agencies such as mUnIcipal and/or County agencies, school districts or utility companies (e.g., water, gas, electricity, etc.) including, but not limited to, the City of San Diego water reservoir and Otay Water District parecls as noted above. C. Issues: No major issues have been identified with the proposed creation of the PQ Zone. The creation of the PQ Zone has been addressed in the EIR for SPA One and Annexation (EIR 95-01) and the EIR for the Sphere of Influence Update (EIR 94-03) D. Conclusion: PCRPT4JO.DOC disc il3 4/5/96 '7 Page 4, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached Resolution of Approval (PCA 96-03) recommending that the City Council adopt the attached draft Ordinance creating the PQ Zone. 3, Prezoning of Specific Parcels (PCZ 96-A) A. Background/Proposal: The parcels noted in Section B bclow and illustrated in Exhibits C through I were initially addressed in the Sphere of Influence Update Study, which was approved by the City Council on March 21, 1995. The Sphere of Influence Update was partially approved by LAFCO on February 5, 1996 and is anticipated to be acted upon by LAFCO on April I, 1996. Additionally, the City Council has approved a resolution to petition LAFCO for the annexatIon of the Otay Ranch Annexation No. I, which includes the Otay Valley Parecl, the Ranch House, the Inverted "L" property of the Otay Ranch and the Watson McCoy property. The City Council also directed staff to submit an Annexation Application for Planning Areas One and Three of the Sphere Study and the Otay Ranch House property. The Annexation Application has been submitted to LAFCO. The Environmental Impact Report, which addresses the annexation issues regarding the properties noted below, is being reviewed concurrently with this application. While the applicant is primarily interested in annexing only SPA One, City staff believes additional territory is necessary for proper planning and future extension of City services to serve the entire Otay Valley Parcel: The parecls noted below were included in the annexation and, therefore, arc required by State law to be prezoned. The Otay Valley Planning Area is the largest of the Otay Ranch planning areas encompassing approximatcly 9,000 acres. There are several parcels that are not part of the Otay Ranch included within this Planning Area that are specifically defined below Generally, they include parcels of between 9 to 250 acres and include the Nelson/Sloan rock quarry, the Otay Water District, the existing City of San Diego reservoir sites and several other privately owned properties. Planning Area Three is approximately 457 acres in size. Parcels which are not a part of the Otay Ranch include the Watson property and the smaller Clarkson property. B. Parcel Infonnation: The following is a list of parcels to be prezoned along with their proposed prezone designation, the City General Plan designation and the current County General Plan designation. PCRPT410.DOC disc II) 4/5/96 q- Page 5, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 CITY COUNTY PARCEL PRE- GENERAL GENERAL INFORMATION APN ACRES ZONE PLAN PLAN San Diego Water 644-070-04 19.59 PQ P/QP Intensive Reservoir Parcel Agriculture Clarkson 595-050-05, 7.5 PC Low Res. Multiple Rural 06 0-3 du/ac Residential Dauz, AKA deGraaf, 641-030-09 7.82 PC Open Space Residential-6 Barnabas Fdn. EastLake Land Swap 643-020-40 106.31 PC Low-Med, Intensive &41;45-47 Med-High, Agriculture Comm. & aDen SDace Gerhardt 641-060-02, 11.84 PC L-M Res Residential-6 03 (3-6 du/ac) Intensive Ag Groman 641-030-10 1.82 PC Open Space Residential -6 Otay Water District 643-020- 56.77 PQ P/QP Intensive 08,13,25,26 Agriculture & 27 Nelson/Sloan 646-060-06 136.47 A Open Space Multiple Rural Rock Quarry Use Ross 641-030-03 9.9 PC L-M Res. Residential 6 3-6 du/ac Southwest Corner 59.54 PC Open Space Impact Sensitive (54.4) Industrial (5 ac) Burns 645-030-10, 14.94 PC Open Space Impact Sensitive 11,12 Hofer 645-030-07, 14.62 PC Open Space Impact Sensitive 08,09 Kelstrom 645-030-04 5 PC Open Space Impact Sensitive Ostling 645-030-03, 9.98 PC Open Space Impact Sensitive 13 Rabello 645-030-06 5 PC Open Space ImDact Sensitive Rowland 645-030-14 5 PC Open Space Industrial Selman 645-030-05 5 PC aDen SDace ImDact Sensitive Watson 585-150-02 160 PC Low Res (0- Multiple Rural 3 du/ac) Use PCRPT41O,DOC disc It3 4/5/96 c; Page 6, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 C. Analvsis; All out-parcel property OW11ers were contacted by mail during the processing of SPA One. The owners were given the opportunity to meet with staff regarding the development potential on their individual parcels which would exist after annexation into the City. While many of the property OW11ers did not respond, some contacted staff by phone with questions, and several came in to meet with Planning Department and Otay Raneh Project staff. Concerns voiced by the property owners dealt with the perception that their property would have less development rights if annexed into the City than if it were to remain in the County unincorporated area. Additional meetings were also held with the various property OW11ers in the Southwest Comer area, since this general location has unique issues associated with it. Those owners who were not able to attend the meetings contacted staff by telephone. D. Issues; No major issues have been identified with the proposed prezoning for the parcels noted below. The prezonings have been addressed in the EIR for SPA One and Annexation (EIR 95-0 I) and the EIR for the Sphere ofInfluenee Update (EIR 94-03). The specific property OW11ers who voiced concern regarding the pre-zoning and annexation are as follows: Parcels surrounded bv the Otav Ranch Proieet on three sides and located west of Paseo Ranchero APN: 641-030-09, Dauz, (AKA Barnabas Foundation). (See Exhibit C) Staff was contacted by Mr. David Van der Ploeg who expressed concern that the property would receive greater development potential within the County than in the City. The Barnabas Foundation is not inherently opposed to the prezoning or annexation but would prefer that their property be purchased by the SPA One project applicant. If developed within the County of San Diego under the Residential-6 designation, the owner would potentially be able to develop their 7.82-aere parcel with 46 dwelling units. Under the City's current General Plan designation of Open Space, the parcel would have the development potential, or density transfer potential, of one lot per 10 acres or one dwelling unit. It should be noted, however, that the enactment of the County Resource Protection Ordinance in 1986 would severely restrict the development potential of the property if it were to be developed within the County's jurisdiction due to slopes and habitat. The impact of this ordinance on the development potential of this property would have to be further evaluated to deteffiline current development potential in the County. As indicated in the ehart above, the proposed prezoning of this parcel would be to Pc. As previously indicated in Section I of this report, the owner would have three options under the PC scenario. It is staff's preference that the parcel be folded into the overall planning effort for the Otay Ranch. Policies are also contained in SPA One that encourage the comprehensive planning of the area west of Paseo Ranchero. APN: 641-030-10, Groman. (See Exhibit C) Staff was contacted by Ms. Groman by telephone who indicated the same concerns that were voiced by Mr. Van der Ploeg. If developed within the County of San Diego under the Residential-6 designation, the owner PCRPT410.DOC disc #3 4/5/'96 /c Page 7, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 would potentially be able to develop her 1.82-aere parcel with 10 dwelling units. Under the City's current General Plan designation of Open Space, the parcel would have the development potential, or density transfer potential, of one lot per 10 acres or one dwelling umt Since this parcel is contiguous to the Dauz (Bamabas Foundation) parcel discussed above, the same constraints arc placed on the property by the County's Resource Protection Ordinance. As indicated above, the proposed prezoning of this parcel would be to PC, and the owner would have the three options stated earlier in the staff report. City staff would, again, prefer that the parcel be folded into the overall planning effort for the Otay Ranch since the SPA One contains policies that encourage the comprehensive planning of the area west of Paseo Ranchero. APN: 641-030-03, Ross. (See Exhibit C) Staff met wIth Mr. and Mrs. Ross who were interested in the process but had no real concerns with bemg annexed into the City or the land use designation they were assigned. [f developed in the County under the R-6 designation, the owner would have the potential of developing 59 units. If developed in the City under the underlying L-M Residential standards, the owner would have the development potential of 44 units at the mid-point of the density range. It should be noted, however, that the future trolley alignment is proposed to bisect the Ross property which would limit the developability of their pareel. Again, staff would prefer that the area west of Pasco Ranchero be developed as a unit per the polieies indicated in SPA One. APN: 641-060-02 & 03, Gerhardt. (See Exhibit C) Staff spoke with Mr. Gerhardt by telephone. He was satisfied with the annexation proposal. The property is surrounded on three sides by Village One. [f developed in the County under the R6 designation, the owner would have the potential of developing up to 44 units. [f developed in the City under the underlying L-M Residential standards, the OW11er would have the development potential of 52 dwelling units at the mid-point of the density range. As indicated above, this property is proposed to be zoned Pc. Parcels Surrounded bv the Inverted "L" Parcel APN: 595-050-05 & 06, Clarkson. (See Exhibit D) Staff was contacted by Mr. Clarkson who indicated that he was satisfied that his property was being annexed into the City and voiced his support of the annexation effort. If developed within the County of San Diego under the Multiple Rural Use designation, the OW11er would have the development potential of one dwelling unit per 8 acres. Under the City's current General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac), the 7.5-acre parcel would have the development or density transfer potential of 7.5 single-family units. As indicated above, the proposed prezoning of this parcel would be to PC. APN: 585-150-02, Watson. (See Exhibit D) Staff met with Tim Wilson of the Watson Land Company. He voiced his support of the annexation effort and was in favor of his 160-acre parcel bemg annexed into the City. [fdeveloped within the County of San Diego under the Multiple Rural Use designation, the applicant would have the development potential of one dwelling unit per 8 acres, or 20 single-family units. Under the City's eurrent General Plan designation of Low Density Residential (0-3 du/ac), the 160-acrc PCRPT410.DOC disc 1i3 4/5/96 . I ,/ / / Page 8, Item IX Meeting Date 4/10/96 parcel would havc thc dcvelopment or density transfer potential of 224-single family units, based on the mid-point of the density range. Planning Area One APN: 643-020-40,41 & 45-47, EastLake Land Swap. (See Exhibit E) Staff has met with representatives of the EastLake Company, and they are supportive of the annexation and prezoning. If developed within the County of San Diego under the Intensive Agriculture designation, the owner would have the development potential of 40 dwelling units. The Chula Vista General Plan designates 19 acres of Low-Medium Residential with a mid-point of 85 dwelling units, 45 acres of Medium-High Residential with a mid-point of 653 dwelling units, 52 acres of commercial, 11 acres of open space and 17 acres of circulation. Approximately 55 acres of this land has already been annexed into the City as part of the EastLake Greens Expansion. APN: 645-030-3-14, Southwest Corner. (See Exhibit F) Staff met with three of the property owners (Bums, Rabello and Hofer) in October 1995 and with Mr. Bums and Mr. Hofcr again in March 1996. The remaining three owners responded by telephone to thc lettcr sent by staff. All wcre concerned that their property would be potentially downzoned with annexation into the City of Chula Vista. Currently, County zoning on all of these parcels is A-70 (Limited Agriculture), which would allow them to build one single-family house on a minimum 4-aere parcel as well as limited agricultural uses such as growing of containcr plants. While the area is proposed to be prezoned PC, the underlying permitted land use would be Agriculture in order to be consistent with the City's General Plan general plan designation of Open Space. The Open Space designation within the City allows one residential unit per every 10 acres. City policies, upon annexation, would allow one dwelling unit per legal lot of record. Therefore, in actuality similar development potential could be realized either within the City or the County. In a site visit to the southwest comer, staff observed that all of the parcels are currently vacant except for parcels 645-030-07, 08 and 09 owned by Mr. Hofer. Parcels 645-030- 10, II and 12, owned by Mr. Bums, have been rough graded and are otherwise vacant. Staff noted an active trucking business, trailer office building and a metal building being used for truck storage and repair on Mr. Hofer's parcels. We have not been able to verify with the County whether or not these uses have permits. In the event that they do have permits, they would be annexed into the City as legal non-conforming uses. In the event that the uses are not legal, the owner would have to pursue a General Plan Amendment and zone change in order to legalize them. Both owners have indicated to City staff that, if annexed into the City, they prefer to pursue industrial zoning. The most southerly Parcel 14 is vacant but is dissimilar to the other parcels in the southwest comer in that currently County zoning is M-52 (Limited Industrial). This zone designation allows for a wide variety of industrial and commercial uses. In order to be consistent with the City's General Plan, the area would stilI have to receive the underlying zone designation of Open Space. The property owner would have to pursue a General Plan Amendment and zone change in order to allow industrial use. PCRPT410.DOC disc #3 4/5,/96 /:<, Page 9, Item IX Meeting Date 4/1 0/96 APN: 646-060-06, Nelson/Sloan Rock Quarry. (See Exhibit G) The rock quarry has been operating since the mid-1950's within the County of San Diego. It is the intent to pre-zone the quarry to A-8 and alIow it to contmue operation as a legal non-conforming use. The quarry made application to the County for an asphalt batch plant in the late 1980's. This application was never acted on by the County. Should the applicant wish to consider a similar use once annexed into the City, an application for a Conditional Use Permit would have to be submitted to the City Staff has met w,th the quarry operator, and they arc supportive of annexation as long as they arc all owed eontmued operatIOn of their facility APN: 644-070-04, San Diego Water Reservoir Parcel (See Exhib,t H) The site is currently operating as a reservoir The proposed pre-zoning is to Public/Quasi-Public which would alIow the site to continue operation m its current form. The site IS surrounded on three sides by VilIage Five, is currently operating as a reservoir and IS planned for reservoir expansion. APN: 643-020-08, 13,25,26 & 27, Otay Water District Parcels (See Exhibit I) The above parcels arc proposed to be prezoned PQ, which would alIow them to function as a water reservoir site. E. Conclusion; Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution of Approval (PCZ 96-A) recommending approval of the proposed prezones and forward their recommendation to City Council. Attachments Exhibit A Exhibit B: Exhibit C: Exhibit D Exhibit E: Exhibit F: Exhibit G: Exhibit H: Exhibit I Exhibit J; Proposed amendment to PC Zone Proposed PQ Zone Dauz, Groman, Ross, Gerhardt parcels Watson, Clarkson parcels EastLake land swap parcels Southwest corner parcels Nelson Sloan Rock Quarry parcels San Diego Water Reservoir parcel Otay Watef District parcel Annexation Map ResolutIOn of Approval PCA 96-02/PCZ 96-A and Draft City Council Ordinance ResolutIOn of Approval PCA 96-03 and Draft City Council Ordinance PCRPT41 O.DOC disc #3 4/5/96 /::( , -- PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO TITLE 19 TO PERMIT ADOPTION OF PC PREZONING DESIGNATION ON PROPERTY LESS THAN FIFTY (SO) ACRES IN SIZE WITHOUT APPROVAL OF GDP 19A8.020 Regulations generally-Minimum acreage-Ownership restrictions. A. P-C zones may be established on parcels of land which are suitable for, and of sufficient size to be planned and developed in a manner consistent with the purpose of this chapter and the objectives of this division. No P-C zone shail include less than fifty acres of contiguous lands; B. All land in each P-C zone. or approved section thereof. shall be held in one ownership or under unified control unless otherwise authorized by the planning commission. except as provided for in Section 19.48.160. For the purposes of this chapter. the written consent or agreement of all owners in a P-C zone to the proposed general development plan and general development schedule shail be deemed to indicate unified control. 19.48.030 Application-Method-Documents required. A P-C zone may be initiated by one or more owners, Bf by a developer representing said owners or by the City upon application made in the manner specified in this chapter. 19.48.070 P-C zone-City council action-Compliance with general development plan required. B. At the time of adoption of a P-C zone amendment, the city council shail adopt. by resolution. the general development plan as defined in Section 19.48.040,e~cepLaSpr[)Vided for in Section 19.48.160. 19.48.090 Sectional planning areas and sectional planning area plans-Reqnirements and content. A. Ail P-C zones shail be divided into sectional planning areas,~Ji.c~pta$prpyidedfpr in Section 19.4~,160. These areas of subcommunities shall be depicted on the plan diagram of the general development plan of a P-C zone, and shall be addressed in the text thereof. 19.48.160 P.C Zone.Exceptions. Exceptions to the above requirements include the following: A. Individual parcels under separate ownership or contrPl, but adjacent to land with an approved general development plan will not requireapprOvaJ oia generaJdevelopment plan concurrent with the adoption of the P.C zone. However, subsequent implementation of the p..c zone pursuant to the provisions contained within this section, and development of said Mea will require tbe approval of one of the following: a) An amendment ta an adjacent general development plan and adoption and/or amendment of sectional planning area plan whiCh woutd include tbe subject area, or b} A precise plan, as defined in Section 19.14.570 through 19.14.581, for development of the area consistent witb the provisions of paragraph C, below. . B. Any land area that is subject to the exceptiorn contained in this section will not be required to have unified ownership or control upon adoption of the p..c zone. However, unified ownership f-XH Ibt-r p. /// /'7 or control as defined in Section 19.48.020. paragraph B, shaH be required of the subject land area prior to adoption of an amended general development plan and adoption and! or amendment of a sectional planning area plan. C. Underlying land use regulations, including permiued, accessory and conditional land uses. for P.C zone areas which do not have an approved general development plan shall be subject to the provisions of a zoning designation which would be consistent with the general plan land use designation for the property. Esmblishing specific underlying zoning regulations will .>ccur at the time of adoption of the PC zone, {"r<-: IOnc 11.11 Rn'l.\cu J.:4/Qh 2 /s- PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO TITLE 19 TO CREATE A ;\/EW PUBLIC/QUASI-PUBLIC ZONE Chapter 19.47 P_Q - PUBLiC/QUASI-PUBLIC ZONE Se<:tions: 19.47.010 Purpose. 19.47.020 Pennitted uses. 19.47.030 Accessory uses and buildings. 19.47.040 Conditional uses. 19.47.050 Perfonnance standards. 19.47.060 Siting standards. 19.47.070 Area, lot coverage, yard requirements. 19.47.080 Site plan and architectural approval. 19.47.090 Landfill closure. 19.47.100 Exceptions. 19.47.010 Purpose. The purpose of the public/quasi-public zone is to provide a zone with uses in appropriate locations which are maintained by public or publicly controned agencies such as municipal and/or County agencies. school districts. or utility companies (e;g., water, gas, electricity, etc.), including but not limited to uses such as the County landfill and various water reservoir sites. The regulations of this district also provide for the appropriate closure of existing landfill sites. 19.47.020 Pennitted uses. Permitted uses in the PQ zone are as follows: A. Agricultural uses including grazing and livestock raising; B. Water reservoirs; and, C. Public parks. . 19.47.030 Accessory uses and buildings. Accessory uses permitted in the PQ zone incJude the following: A. Caretakers units, as accessory to the principal permitted or conditionally permitted use; and, B. Public utility service and corporation yards. 19.47.040 Conditional uses. Conditional uses permitted in the PQ zone incliIde: A. Sanitary landfills unless excepted by section 19.47.100: 0'/L: //- /4/ . ,." ',c' y, . ,~-~ B. Schools: C. Utility substations: D. Cellular facilities: E. Fire stations: F. Post offices: G. Land reclamation projects: H. Recycling collection centers, subject 10 the provisions of recycling collection centers standards in Section 19.58.345: l. Golf driving ranges, with or without lighting: J. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.178: K Unclassified uses ,as provided in Chapter 19.54; and, L. Any other; use. which, is determined by the planning commission to be of the same general character as the above uses. 19.47.050 Performance standards. All existing and future uses permitted by this use title shall be subject to initial and continued compliance withtheperf6rmancestandards in Chapter 19.66. 19.47.060 Siting standards. The following standards shall govern the siting of facilities in the public/quasi-public zone: A. All solid waste management operations within the PQ lOne shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, including regulations of the State Water Resources Control Board. the California Waste Management Board. and the Department of Health Services. B. The distance from the site to the nearest residential structure shall be in compliance with all of the state minimum standards for solid. waste management. The distance of such sites to residences shall be sufficient to permit adequate control of noise levels, odor nuisances, traffic congestion, litter nuisances and vectors. 19.47.070 Area, Lot Coverage, Yard requirements. The area, lot coverage and yard requirements will be established through the site plan and architectural permit process. 19.47.080 Site plan and arcWtectural approval. Site plan and architectural approval are required for all uses in the PQ zone, as provided in Sections 19.14.420. through 19.14.480. 19.47.090 Landf"Ul closure. Any sanitary landfill existing within the PQ zone which is subject to closure shall be terminated in a manner which complies with any and aU applicable federal, state, and local regulations, including regulations of the State Water Resources Control Board, the California Waste Management Board, and the Department of Health Services and in accordance with any agreements entered into with the City. -2- /"'/ 19.47.100 Exceptions. Any sanitary landfill use existing prior to (adolJiion date ofthis amendmenr) shall be permitted to continue operating as a legally permitted use provided that the property owner has entered into an agreement with the City that establishes specific regulations andior guidelines. pq 1l'1I~ /1;11 R~'.I'~u 310.1 '11' -3- /6 7500' + i'?'<^ ",G'i'- "\"'\. , ~O~ ~ ci'~ . -1--/ ,,01'0 ~- -" 725.58' '0 ' ..",--= ~-- 632.10' " \ @ DAUZ I GROMAN PARCELS 9.64 AC. APN'S 641,030,09 & 10 \0 o 0 ::::.\c .L.. z. o '-' '"" .L. o 0 c1' '" c (j1 '; ~ L CJ 0, Ii' y Q \0 \ ROSS PARCEL 9.9 AC. APN 641,030,03 15000' -- SOURCE; G.I.S. C\CARLOS\CFDIAG01.CDR .. SW CORNER OF 1/4 SEC. 41 GERHARDT PARCELS 11.84 AC. APN.'S 641,060,02 & 03 CASE NUMBER: PCZ - 96 - A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE: N.T.S. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCil ON ACREAGE: SEE MAP -~ DATE: 3 - 4 - 96 CITY ClERK DATE DRAWN BY: c.:J-. 'J<<nanb C) ZONING MAP ~\II&- _J1__ cm'~ (HULA VISTA CH ECKED BY: NORTH Ex ~'~'t c ;e? I I , ~ o o M 2640.00' COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO WATSON LAND CO. PARCEL 160.00 AC. 585-150-02 " N ID m M CITY OF CHULA VISTA ""w _ N ",,,, I I / . 320.00' 24' 9 25 30 CLARKSON PARCELS 7.50 AC. APN.'S 595-050-05 & 06 D ~ SOURCE: G.I.S. C:ICARLOSICFDIAG06.CDR CASE NUMBER: PCZ-96-A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CllY COUNCIL ON ACREAGE, SEE MAP SCALE, N.T.5. DATE, 3 - 4 - 96 CllY CLERK DATE DRAWN BY, C.:J.. 'Jgtna.t4z C9 ZONING MAP ~!r?- __1.._ CHECKED BY, cmOf CHULA VISTA NORTH 6"k.:bnl D -'7/' 7\'-' n NW CORNER OF SE QUARTER OF SEC.3 T18S-R1W A M L K J SOURCE: G.I.S. CI\CARLOS\CFDIAG02.CDR CASE NUMBER: \ H G FEET A 790. CC B 2847 J3 C 8173" 0 172000 E 11300C F 354 59 G 327 18 H 119428 .-------- 38.23 61851 - ---~_..-.._-- K 107729 ---- L 370.00 M 877 .42 PCZ-96-A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT ACREAG E; 106.31 SCALE; N.T.S. DATE: 3 - 4 - 96 DRAWN BY C) C.:J. 'Jgwandu CHECKED BY: NORTH I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON ----- ---- CITY CLERK DATE ZONING MAP ~\Ir?- -3-- COY Df CHULA VISTA C:'i i,ti'bi.+- 12 " r ..;/'i / CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF SAN DIEGO OTAY VALLEY RD 0'1''< 1'.\,\0 'PQ'< SOUTHWEST CORNER PARCELS * APN.'S: OSTLING: KELSTROM. SELJMN: RABELLO: HOFER: BURNS: ROWLAND, 645-030-03 & 13 645-030-04 645-030-05 645-030-06 645-030-07, 08, 09 645-030-10,11,12 645-030-14 SW CORNER OF QUARTER SEC. 45 RHO. OTAY SOURCE: G.I.S. CilCARLOSICFDIAG05CDR CASE NUMBER, PCZ-96-A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON ACREA.GE: 59.54 SCALE, N.T.S. -- DATE, 3 - 4 - 96 CITY CLERK DATE DRAWN BY, c. J. 'J,w~z C9 ZONING MAP ~II&- --- CITY'~ CHULA VlSTA CHECKED BY, NORTH r:~~b+ f /7/l -"/"'1 1338 90' 3002.66' " ~ SW CORNER OF QUARTER SEC. 37 ROCK QUARRY PARCEL APN. 646-060-06 fl ~ DR PCZ - 96 - A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT -- -- CITY CLERK DATE C9 ~'I?- ZONING MAP _Jl__ cmOf CHULA Vl5rA NORTH ~/'(I.\,'ki'\-- /. --71 ~1 <;?<;, -- CASE NUMBER: ACREAGE: I HEREBY CERTIfY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON 136.47 SCALE: N.T.S. DATE: 3 - 4 - 96 DRAWN BY: C.:J- 'JE'n~z CHECKED BY: CASE NUMBER, SAN DIEGO WATER RESERVOIR PARCEL APN. 644-070-04 u-SE CORNER OF QUARTER SEC. 28 \\\0.00' ~. C\CARLOS\CFDIAG07.CDR PCZ-96-A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON ACREAGE, 19.59 SCALE, N.T.S. DATE, 3 - 4 - 96 --.-- ~-_.- CITY CLERK DATE DRAWN BY, c. J. 'Jgno.n,kz C9 ZONING MAP ~II?- ---- ern'''' CHULA VISTA CHECKED BY, NORTH tx~bit H- /qJ TELEGRAPH K L OTAY WATER G DISTRICT PARCELS ~ APN. 'S 643-020-08, 13. 25. 26. & 27 ~ ~ '" a:: ..: "- F E o c 8 A -- NW CORNER OF SE QUARTER OF SEC. 3 T18S-R1W A 495.76 N 11610 ,----......--- B 218.34 0 200.96 C 67000 P 186.84 ------------- D 412.54 Q 75.90 E 10057 R 150.88 ------ F 628.95 5 33.31 - ----------- G 412.00 T 100.57 -i~- -- --+--"--- H i 585.63 U 332.27 ,---- 49.28 V 312.00 --_..__._~_.._--- 71.00 W 322.00 --~-- K 62.05 X 1725.00 L 156.04 Y 230.00 -~-~ M 482.35 I X y CASE NUMBER: PCZ - 96 - A CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE: N.T.S. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON ACREAGE: 56.77 DATE: 3 - 4 - 96 -- - DATE CITY ClERK DRAWN BY: C.:J- 'JEwantkz e) ZONING MAP ~'I~ __"1..._ cn"~ CHULA VISTA CHECKED HY: NORTH f' y ~A'101 +-r /}C~ _/'I,~ AREAS OF ANNEXATION - -- r- -- Ii; 'C , ~ o lID ~ r - - - - - JU Chula VI&ta I I n )..... / ~ ),. , . , , , , " .' .- r IS I Boundary ---- 0.93 o . 0.93 '-'111.5 I o Non-Dtay Ranch Parcel. fXH!bfi J ~Jft., ::-r-:: .... /7; CTIY Of 7( (C CHUIA VISTA . Annexation Areas I OIay Ranch Area C(OGRAP'HIC I""O~"'T!O'" ~nH \!