The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/12/13 (4) PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT Item 3 Meeting Date 12/13/95 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCS-96-03; Tentative Subdivision Map for the EastLake Greens Unit 23, Chula Vista Tract 96-03, involving 70 single family lots and 3 open space lots on 20.3 acres located on the west side of South Greensview Drive, east of EastLake Parkway - EastLake Development Company The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as EastLake Greens Unit 23, Chula Vista Tract 96-03, in order to subdivide 20.3 acres into 70 single family detached lots and 3 open space lots (see Exhibit B). The project site is identified as Parcel R-23 in the EastLake Greens SPA plan and is located on the west side of South Greensview Drive, east of EastLake Parkway (see locator/ Exhibit A). An amendment to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan is presently being processed and consists of relocating two park sites, the transfer of densities, and land use boundary adjustments. As part of this amendment, Parcel R-23 has been relocated slightly to the south and reconfigured from 15.8 acres to 20.3 acres. Since the tentative map is being processed concurrently with the above-referenced SPA amendment, staff is recommending that approval of this project be contingent upon approval of the GDP and SPA amendments, PCM-96-02. Based on this contingency, the analysis presented in this report assumes the new land use designation, parcel configuration, acreage and designated number of units for this parcel. The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project implements and falls under the purview of EIR-86-04 and Addendum FSEIR-86-04(B) and that no further environmental review is necessary (see Attachment 4). There are no unresolved issues between the applicant and staff on this proposal. RECOMMENDA TION Adopt attached Planning Commission Resolution PCS-96-03 recommending approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for EastLake Greens Unit R-23, Chula Vista Tract 96-03, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached Draft City Council Resolution. Page 2, Item 3 Meeting Date 12/13/95 DISCUSSION Site Characteristics The project site is a development pad created as part of the South Greens mass grading program. The relative elevation of the site to the street decreases from west to east and from north to south. The project site is bounded on the northeast by South Greensview Drive, to the northwest by a neighborhood park site, to the southeast by a vacant residential lot, and to the southwest by a utility easement (see 10catorlExhibit "A"). Zoning and Land Use Zoning Land Use Planned Community District Land Use Designation* Site PC (Planned Community) - Residential, Vacant RS-5 Northeast Northwest PC (Planned Community) - Residential, Vacant PC (Planned Community) - Open Space RS-7 OS-4 Southeast PC (Planned Community) - Residential, Vacant RP-8 Southwest PC (Planned Community) - Open Space / Utility Easement OS-3 * See EastLake Greens Planned Community District Regulations, Exhibit C. Proposal The proposed tentative map consists of subdividing 20.3 acres into 70 single family detached lots and 3 open space lots (lots A and B, which are located along the South Greensview Drive street frontage, and lot C, which is located along westerly property line adjacent to the 50' wide open space area/water utility easement). The site will be graded in a terraced fashion, creating three levels decreasing in elevation from west to east; site drainage will be from the northwest to the southeast. The project site elevation is approximately 12' higher than the existing elevations of both the westerly and easterly adjacent vacant residential lots. The subdivision design consists of four cul-de-sac streets with a maximum length of 600' and connected by a single spine leading to the sole access point at South Greensview Drive. The majority of the residential lots are 50-60 feet wide, except for Page 3, Item 3 Meeting Date 12/13/95 certain lots with frontages along street knuckles and at the end of cul-de-sacs, which are shown as 35-47 feet wide (50+ ft. wide at the setback line). One lot, Lot I I, does not appear to meet the required minimum width; thus, a condition requiring this lot to meet minimum lot width has been included (condition 39). Lots 45 and 46 are double frontage lots; staff is recommending that decorative walls be installed at the top of slope at each rear yard, and that the landscape strip between the fence and the street be designated as an open space lot and maintained by the EastLake Greens Master Homeowners Association. Compliance with EastLake Greens General Development and SPA Plan The EastLake Greens General Development Plan designates Parcel R-23 as Low/Medium (LM), 3-6 du/ac. The target density and a maximum number of units established in the SPA plan is 3.5 dulac and 72 units. The project, as conditioned, is in compliance with the EastLake Greens GDP and SPA. Compliance with Planned Communitv District Regulations The EastLake Greens Land Use District Plan designates the site as RS-5, Residential Estate. Within this land use designation, lots are required to have a minimum area of 5,000 sq. ft. with minimum dimensions of 50 ft. wide and 100 ft. deep (see Exhibit C-l and C-2). The average size parcel ( 8,000 sq.ft.) meets or exceeds the above mentioned minimum development standards. Affordable Housing The EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Program and Agreement has been adopted and incorporated into the SPA Plan to ensure that a minimum of 10% affordable housing, including a mix of housing types and lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various apartment densities, will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for persons of various incomes. Conclusion With the approval of amendments to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan currently being processed, this project as conditioned will be in compliance with applicable regulations. Thus, staff recommends approval of the project in accordance with the attached Planning Commission Resolution. Attachments 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Draft City Council Resolution 3. Exhibits 4 FSElR-86-04(B) 5. Disclosure Statement M\home\planning\luis\pcs 9603 .rep ATTACHMENT 1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO, PCS-96-03 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL R-23, CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-03, WITHIN THE EASTLAKE GREENS PLANNED COMMUNITY WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on September 27, 1995, by EastLake Development Company; and, WHEREAS, said application requests approval to subdivide Parcel R-23, Chula Vista Tract 96-03, within the EastLake Greens Planned Community; and, WHEREAS, the property consists of 20,3 acres located on the south side of South Greensview Drive between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway, and the proposal is to subdivide the property into 70 single family detached lots and 3 open space lots; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project implements and falls under the purview of EIR-86-04 and Addendum ElR-86-04B and that no further environmental review is necessary; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on the tentative map and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and it mailing to property owners and tenants within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least IO days prior to the hearing; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p,m" December 13, 1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has previously considered EIR-86-04 and Addendum EIR-86-04(B) and, therefore, no further environmental action by the Commission is necessary, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 96-03 in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of December, 1995, by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: William C, Tuchscher II, Chair ATTEST: Nancy Ripley, Secretary m: Ihome/planning/luis/pcs9603. per ATTACHMENT 2 DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE GREENS PARCEL R-23, CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-03 I. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and commonly known as Unit 23 of EastLake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 96-03; and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 20.3 acres located on the west side of South Greensview Drive, between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway, within the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community ("Project Site"); and, B, Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on September 27, 1995 EastLake Development Company ("Owner") filed a Tentative Subdivision Map application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Greens Unit 23, Chula Vista Tract 96-03 in order to subdivide the Project Site into 70 residential lots and 3 open space lots (lots A, B, and C) ("Project"); and C, Prior Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of I) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 15198 ("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199 (" SPA "); and 3) a Tentative Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 15200 ("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No, 16898 on November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, and SPA amendment previously approved by City Council Resolution No, on December 19, 1995; and D, Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on December 13, 1995, and voted (-> to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed below, E. City Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 16, 1995, on the Project and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on the Project held on December 13, 1995, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding, III. PREVIOUS EIR-86-04 AND ADDENDUM EIR-86-04(B) REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; FINDINGS; APPROVALS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has previously reviewed, analyzed, considered, and approved ElR-86-04 and Addendum ElR-86-04(B) and therefore no further action by the City Council is necessary. IV. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A, Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473,5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for EastLake Greens Unit 23, Chula Vista Tract No, 96-03 is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: a, Land Use The EastLake Greens General Development Plan designates parcel R-23 as Low/Medium density Residential (3-6 du/ac), The SPA plan provides a target density of 3,5 du/ac and a maximum of 72 dwelling units, The project, as conditioned, is in substantial compliance with the GDP and SPA, b, Circulation All of the on-site public streets and off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer in accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan and Development Agreement. The public streets within the Project will be designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements, The adjoining street system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of traffic from this and other area projects, c, Housing The EastLake Greens Affordable Housing Program and Agreement has been adopted and incorporated into the SPA Plan to ensure that a minimum of IO % affordable housing including a mix of housing types and lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various apartment densities will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for persons of various incomes, d, Conservation The Environmental Impact Report ElR-86-04 and Addendum ElR-86- 04(B) addressed the goals and policies of the Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of this site to be consistent with these goals and policies, e, Parks and Recreation, Open Space The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open space consistent with City policies, f. Seismic Safety The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site, g, Safety The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency servIces, h, Noise Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report ElR-86-04 and Addendum ElR-86-04B adequately address the noise policy of the General Plan, The project has been conditioned to require that all dwelling units be designed to preclude noise levels over 45 dBA, Additionally, all exterior private open space will be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to limit the exterior noise exposure to 65 dBA for all outside private patio areas, 1. Scenic Highway The project site is not located adjacent to a designated scenic highway, J, Bicycle Routes Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned Community area design and are presently in use, The public streets within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel within the interior of the subdivision. k, Public Buildings No public buildings are proposed on the project site, The project IS subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits. B, Pursuant to Section 66412,3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources, C, The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the optimum sitting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by Government Code Section 66473, I. D, The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects, E, The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below, V. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the foregoing Tentative Subdivision Map which is stated to be conditioned on "General Conditions", is hereby conditioned as follows: A. Project Site is Improved with Project Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in Tentative Subdivision Map Chula Vista Tract 96-03 and EIR-86-04 and Addendum EIR-86-04(B) except as modified by this Resolution, B, Implement Mitigation Measures Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental Impact Report for EastLake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Addendum EIR-86-04(B). C, Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval of the Eastlake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3 established by Resolution No, 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989 and Amending Resolution 17618, and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions, and provisions of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned Community District Regulations, the Eastlake Greens Development Agreement, the Water Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the Public Facilities Financing Plan as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this tentative, prior to approval of the Final Map or shall have entered into an agreement with the City, providing the City with such security (including a recordation of covenants running with the land) and implementation procedures as the City may require, assuring that after approval of the Final Map, the developer shall continue to comply with, remain in compliance with, and implement such plans, D, Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista, The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision, E, Contingency of Project Approval Approval of this tentative map is contingent upon the approval of the General Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan amendments PCM-96- 07, and PC District Regulations and Land Use District Plan amendments included therein, taking effect. F, Project Phasing If phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps, submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map, Improvements, facilities, and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit of development shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of Planning, The City reserves the right to conditional approval of each final map with the requirement to provide said improvements, facilities, and/or dedications as necessary to provide adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments, The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision, VI. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall: STREETS. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 1, Submit for approval by the City Engineer detailed improvement plans in accordance with Chula Vista Design Standards, Chula Vista Street standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual. Street sections shall comply with current City street design standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 2, Install a cross gutter on South Greensview Drive at the subdivision entry, 3, Install a pedestrian ramp on the north side of South Greensview Drive opposite the southwesterly corner of the subdivision entrance to meet City standards, 4, Street light locations shall be approved by the City Engineer. 5, Construct, or guarantee the construction of, of all public improvements (streets, cross gutters, curb and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, utilities, sewer, storm drain, etc) deemed necessary to provide service to the subject subdivision in accordance with City standards, 6, Submit an hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry lane calculations for Streets "A", "B", and "C", 7, Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage facilities. 8, Provide paved access to all public sewer manholes (minimum 15' width) adequate to accommodate H-20 wheel load, 9, Provide temporary turnarounds for emergency vehicle assess at all unit boundaries to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. 10. Submit and obtain approval of construction plans to install off-site sewer and storm drain facilities from the subdivision boundary to point of connection with existing facilities in South Greensview Drive. Construction of said facilities shall be guaranteed prior to approval of the final map, Align said off-site sewer and storm drain facilities within public street rights-of-way or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. GRADING AND DRAINAGE II. Submit for approval by the City Engineer a detailed grading plan in accordance with the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance 1741. 12, Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to the original document prepared by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer. 13, Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation control plan as part of grading plans, 14, Submit letters of permission to grade for all off-site grading, 15. Show the location of existing cut/fill lines on grading plans, 16, Provide a minimum 10' wide area with a maximum slope of 2 % behind the back of sidewalk along the cul-de-sac of Street" A" , 17, All grading and pad elevations shall be within 2 feet of the grades and elevations shown on the tentative map dated October 24, 1995 or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director. AGREEMENTS 18, Agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject subdivision if anyone of the following occur: a, Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached, b, Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services exceed the adopted City threshold standards, c, The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements affected, In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the City Planning Director and Public Works Director. 19, Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense, 20. Agree to hold tbe City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from this project. 21. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service to each lot within the subdivision, Restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista. 22, Agree to provide a noise study addressing noise impacts generated by major streets surrounding the project (South Greensview) and implement any measures necessary to mitigate noise impacts to acceptable levels prior to issuance of building permits, OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS 23, Offer to grant in fee on the Pinal Map Open Space Lots "A", "B", and "C", The minimum width of Lots "A" and "B" shall be 10 feet. The City Clerk's statement on the final maps shall indicate rejection of said lots subject to future acceptance in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act. 24, Submit a list of all facilities located on open space lots to be maintained by the existing Eastlake Maintenance District No, 1, This list shall include a description, quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls, fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage structures and landscaping, Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for open space maintenance, Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the number of acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the estimation of a maintenance budget thereof, 25, Pay additional fees into Assessment District Numbers 90-3,91-1 and 94-1 due to a change in units approved subsequent to District formation as determined by the City Engineer. 26. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary, Request apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $25/unit/district to cover costs, 27, Submit all disclosure forms for the approval of the City Engineer. EASEMENTS 28, Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for general utility purposes along public street frontage of Open Space Lots A and B offered for dedication to the City, 29, Grant to Otay Municipal Water District a 20' wide easement for construction and maintenance of water facilities within Open Space Lot B and Lot 62, Provide acceptance certificate of said easement on final map, 30, Grant a minimum 10' easement to the City of Chula Vista for construction and maintenance of public sewer facilities within Lots 45 and 41 on the final map, 31. Grant a minimum 10' easement to the City of Chula Vista for construction and maintenance of storm drain facilities within Lots 24, 28, 41, and 45 on the final map, 32, Grant off-site easements to the City of Chula Vista for construction and maintenance of off-site public storm drain and sewer facilities prior to approval of the final map, 33, Relinquish all access rights to Street B along the frontage of Lots 44 and 45. MISCELLANEOUS 34, Submit, process and record a boundary adjustment for Lots 8, 9, and 10 of the EastLake South Greens Phase 2 & 3 Final Map prior to approval of any final map for this subdivision, 35. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD '83), 36. Submit copies of each final map and improvement plan in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior to approval of each Final Map, Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in duplicate on 5-1/4 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map. 37, Modify lot 1 I to meet the required 50 ft. minimum lot width at the building setback line. 38, Provide a construction schedule with trigger points for the construction of parks P-3 and P-5 for review and approval by the Parks and Recreation Department prior to any final map, 39. Provide decorative type fencing, per established EastLake fence design, along the rear property lines of lots 45 and 46, Said fencing should be integrated with the design of lot 55 exterior fence and front fence of lot 56, 40, Create an open space lot for the 5 ft wide strip of land located between the rear property lines of parcels 45 and 46 and the cul-de-sac at the east end of street B by adjusting the rear lot lines for Jots 45 and 46; said open space lot shall include the decorative fencing and the landscape strip outside of said fencing. As stated in condition 22, offer to grant said open space lot in fee on the Final Map. The City Clerk's statement on the final maps shall indicate rejection of said lots subject to future acceptance in accordance with the State Subdivision Map Act. 41. Provide a declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions for this project to the Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Said CC&Rs shall include provisions assuring maintenance of the above-referenced fencing and landscaping, The City of Chula Vista shall be named as a party to said Declaration, and the City shall be authorized to enforce the terms and conditions of the Declaration in the same manner as any owner within the subdivision, 42, Provide an all weather driving surface for fire access during construction, 43, Ensure that required fire hydrants are installed and operable prior to delivery of any combustible construction materials, CODE REOUlREMENTS 44, Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. 45. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal Code requirements. 46, Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy: a, The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees, b. Signal Participation Fees, c, All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees, d, Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January I, 1995), e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows DIF, f, Salt Creek Sewer Basin DIF (or submit letter of credit prior to final map approval), Pay the amount of said fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits, VII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation, No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. vm. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk, IX. INV ALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio, Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A, Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M, Boogaard City Attorney m: Ihome Iplanninglluislpcs9603. ccr ATTACHMENT 3 EXHIBITS · EXHIBIT "A" - ; 01,' ~ -- 5,' 0$. . OS'3~ I . I~ ~ 5-2 PQ.2 PO., ..-.. . . CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR ~: Emlake Development Company PROJECT DESCRlI'I1ON: C) SUBDIVISION PROJECT lasflak. Greens Requm: Proposal of 69 single family lots in the Eastfake I\DDRESS: Greens Unit 23. SCAlf: FII! NUMBER: NORTH No Scale PCS-96-03 i , /f\ , \ 0 \ ~~ I m I ~~ , I ' . ~ X , , ~ , en I I ' ::I: .. ~~ -e .~ M. - Me \ a:J ~..; \, i N... . . "N - .... -I :!=: =~() -=: I ~ ~.~ I ~ ~: , I a:J ", \ : Za :::II . a N . ; ~ ; . I , , i i I I I i I i I i I I 1 ~/ .".~. ! ~. z /~ ,- S , ~ I, ~ / ;- o .. o .. ,. -no: -, " " - )~ :-..::, .....;:"'..:=i--V . ~...."~~~~ I \,\,":"~ \~. ~:~~, ,~I \ \ ... ^~- ... ~~"",\-,~ ~ \\\ \ (/;\'l....,~' h~/t~~l.;:. ,,~ -, !I . fV {- - Jl #""-'i; \~\ - J .... ~ \.,.. p1? /~,V\ II ~... '"'Ii _,.... ,- ... ~./.... -.: 'i~ ~~Jt"'~~ 11- -' ~ ()1 ;::"U). -, \~,_/.\{\~ . .... p-Y. _ ~ t - I \ ~~~1 ~. ~ If.... 'k -'/ -\\ = \f::'" ~..,.'~~~'=~. "'u .."\;/ \ ~J.(itUV'-=/"':::---'':;~~~'/'" i:'-:: ... \~::: .11) T ~1Y '?~I 7~ ... RESIDENTIAL T? "m:... ,I;)::;~ / I V /' .. ~ _ _ - a_ ~:- II / ...........I/~/~ ?"-)...y (~ ';::-'-v.:Y-. __-1- III 1---/, 'v-" I I I"'~r--: .~-I[ \ -_'_-'- '1,1/ !MI, ~/..-'"'\I / I '--II --,\ ___-._ ~ I 11-..11..., \,..-' II -~' \ I!I - I''-=-... I II -/' -,' =~::':7_.' ill I;=:'r~~ -r"~ ~r_ -\ ..... Co... _,- '1- ..., 1', 11.....111) ~f'~ ~~,,~'L .J _II ~~:.::::= l' r'~I-' I!... \~ I 1-, '-.:~.~~~ /^-J~\"" _.. .....___.._ . H -., -r,\ \~, ' ,'1\ ..... / - VJ.JJ(;E CENTER f::--t~c.a( ....'t\-~~\Jlt0..~~~~{;;'~ )1 ~ I...... ,,...}, , ~ ! 1- ') ~'" ~ VC-' - -. - ....J 1-.. --" I "" ~ os.. \ \ .~,..,t,-,\\"" ~ wc-, ---- '\,/ ~ Vos",,>\ V '/ J.#'I_." vc-a __._ ,,~ ./~# \ h.. .is''n~ CENTER ~'RS'I ~..l.IIC-~ >>~'" ~____._.....__ ~,', ( 4f&r '"'" ~ -..-c..r .~~,..,....... DMrte:I ",~""tr" I!II eo.'.L PI.Ff'OSE ---~ ---- .......-... --- . -....... Land Use Districts PrOI)osed . ::::: .~ o.t ........tClllrtcl --..- __-a_ ---.- ---.- ---.- ... ---.- o .., ..... ..... __ .. ; -..-... --..--, -....-- tT)...-.... _a_. ~ ~EASTLAKE A fILAIND c:ct.MNTY If IASILAICE CEVBCIMNT co. EXHIBIT C-1 .a.idaD~ial Proparty Da.alopaaD~ l~aDdar4. LAnd U.. Or~ut) U as. u ac JUS 1. Lo~ araa (in na~ 000'. .quar. faa~) 8 5 31 IP IP 2. Lo~ wid~h (in f..~) '70 50 38 IP IP (a~~ach.d product a in RP cSh~dct) 25 3. Lo~ cSap~h (in f..~) 100 100 90,,,-01 IPSP 50 ,"-111 4. Lo~ covaraga (parcan~) 40 50 IP IP IP 5. Pront yard .atback, a) to diract antry garaga 20 20 SP SP SP b) to aida antry garaga 20 15 IP IP IP (aingla atory garaga in RS diatdct) 10 6. To main raaidanca 20 20 SP IP IP 7. Sida yard aatback, a) to adjacant raaidantial 15/5 10/52 IP SP SP lot (min. total/ana .ida) b) to adjacant atraat 10 10 10 IP SP (cornar lot) 8. .aar yard .atback 20 15 IP 811 SP 9. Building haight, maximum 28' 28' 28' 45 45 (2 1/2 atory max. RE, JlS , RP diatdcU) 10. Parking apacaa par unit 2 2 2' 1.5 1.5 (gar.) (gar.) 1 bc:Irlll..l bdrlft. unit unit 2.0 op 2.0 op 2 bdrm.2 bdrm. unit unit 2.5 op 2.5 op 3 belrm.3 bel.... unit + unit + ----------- 1 Kay ba modifiad for attachad unita with lita Plan approval a JlS-5 Diatrict only, 13/3 in JlS-7 Diatrict · Kay ba incraaaad to 35 faat with lita Plan approval · Two car garaga for RP datachad unita, ona car varaga and ona carport for RP attachad unit a (3/1/89) 11-4 EXHIBIT C-2 ATTACHMENT 4 EIR-86-04(B) ADDENDUM SECOND ADDENDUM TO ENVmONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FSEm 86-04 (B) PROJECT NAME: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment PROJECT LOCATION: Various parcels within theEastLake Greens SPA between Hunte Parkway and the future SR-12S Row north of the future E. Orange Ave. I. INTRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present: 1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration that have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; or 2, Changes in circumstances, additional or refined infonnation available since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration. 3. The changes to the EIR made by the addendum do not raise new issues about the significant effects on the environment. D. PROPOSED PROJECT REVISIONS The Amendments proposed can be grouped in the fonowing general categories: 1. Park Relocations 2. Density Transfers and Parcel Boundary Adjustments 3. 'Removal of Interim Designation on Parcel R-26 1. Park Relocations The Neighborhood Park (parcel P-3) in the adopted plan was partially within the SDG&E easement and contained less than ten acres of net useable acres for park use. The park is proposed by this amendment to be relocated southeasterly of Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B) 2 Parcel R-20 and to contain 10.0 acres net useable for park uses (11.8 acres gross). This relocation deletes former residential Parcel R-21. The former location of the park is proposed to be converted to Public/Quasi-Public as an expansion of existing Parcel PQ-2. This additiona111.0 acres will be available for Community PUlpOse Facilities. A second park relocation involves Parcel P-S, which was a Private Neighborhood Park between Parcels R-20 and R-21. This park is proposed to be relocated near the intersection of South Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway adjacent to Parcel R-12. No significant change in acreage is proposed. 2. Density Transfers and Boundary Adjustments Reductions in densities are proposed in eleven residential parcels. Increases in densities are proposed in four residential parcels. The net result of these density transfers is a 133 unit decrease in the overall residential density. Most of the density transfers are minor adjustments that reflect units achieved in the tract map and design review process. The following parcels are proposed to be changed in a more substantive way (more than 10 du): ~ PrQpOsed Chan~e R-6 R-16 R-20 R-21 R-23 R-26 -12 +26 -37 -120 -142 + 200 (The Adopted Plan provided this parcel with an interim density.) '.. Boundary adjustments occur primarily as a result of Park relocations and are proposed to be reflected in the amended Tentative Tract Map. These adjustments result in a net loss of 11.8 acres of residential land. An increase of 11.0 acres has been added as Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) and the remaining 0.8 acres has been added as Park. The following shows the exis!ing and proposed changes in land use and acreage on the General Development Plan. Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B) 3 Existin& RESIDENTIAL LInd Use Acres dulle Units Proposed RESIDENTIAL LInd Use . Acro. dulle Units ILew LM LowIt ,.cII'!m M Modium MH MediUmII1I;h H High S~Talal 250,5 N 1.0 388.1 o.e 2008 242.2 6-". 1875 125.4 1'.'1. 1114 ".0 '1-27- 250 '011,7 ee60 ILew LM Low.'.f~"" M _ MH ModiurnIHIQh H High . ... T.... 250.1 N 1.0 381.0 o.e 1103 25", 6-11. 2D23 '00,0 ".,., 1M 24.3 '1-27- 1'0 '006.8 1$27 e660 NON-RESIDENTIAL LInd Use Acres c RtIaII U c.o Prof. 1 AdmIn, ... loR R".I LId. Mfgr. '35.1 o Open apace 117.1 PO PubIicIO............, '41.8 P Partcll Roc. 286.2 Mljot~ 214.1 I~ T.... '042,0 ~F""'" UImn '12.8 Projoct T_ 2121.1 NON-RESIDENTIAL La nd Use Acres Retail 51.1 P,ol.l AdmIn. 1,1 R... 1 LId. Mfgr. '35,8 Open Spoco '17.1 PubliclOunl-Pub. '37,8 Per1cl' Roc. 215.4 Major Cireulotion 214.7 Sut>- Talal 1030,2 ~Futu.. Urbon '12.8 Project Talall 2121.1 1$27 3. Removal of Interim Designation Cor Parcel R-26 Parcel R-26 was given an Interim Designation on the Adopted SPA Plan. This designation indicated that the density of 4.S du/ac would be subject to future amendment to reflect the Chula Vista General Plan. The Interim Designation was assigned to allow an Affordable Housing Program for all of EastJake to be developed. This program has proceeded and has designated this parcel as a site to implement a portion of the ChuJa Vista Housing Element requirement for Affordable Housing. The incteaSC in density is proposed to allow this program to be implemented. , L General Development Plan AdoI)ted HI HI L HI HI I",,,~. M ~ 0 I'Q "1 I . . c , ok..... , RESIDENTIAL 0 / p ..... 01 1'" LAIC) I8E ACIIES WlAC IHTS 1 L L ..... -. 1>-, ,<3 II .... -- au H .... 0 0 M - .... ..." "7$ I I'Q "-t' 0 ... ~ .... .... 0 H ..." 11.. '''2'7. lID I 0 _1.... 101,.7 II.. N:)N-RESfJENTlAL L LAIC) La ACfES I'Q . C - 11.1 c-o "'.A~"'I U -- .... =.... 13&1 ..- 0 -- ..... 117.1 00 ~ 111.. , -.- .... ..... CIaMtoon "41 _1.... .'*' ~ ..... .... 72.1 ..... ,.. 112" ec MID .. . --... ow_... .. _....- ......-et...... ..................-- .._....0................ ~ fASTLAKE A PLAANED ~ITY IV EAST\.AICE CE\IEI.OIMNT co. ~tmim .....'_. L 1 --,.-..~ ~.. I"'.~_.- Exhibit 1 . HI HI General Development Plan P rOI)Osed HI c . o~......... , / p RESIDENTIAL '11 /,,, LInd Use Acres dullc UnMs i \..... I~ 250.5 G-3 743 .' . LM Law_um 381.0 o..e 11103 I 1'0 M Medium 251.1 ~", 2D23 . . MH MediumlHigh 100.0 11-18. 1)48 I H High 24.3 1&-27- 1510 Sub- ToIIIl 1006.9 6527 NON-RESIDENTIAL LInd Use Acres Rolllil 51.9 Prof. & Admin. e.8 Res. & lid. Mfgr. 135.9 Open Spice 187,e PubliC/Q...;.Pub. 148.9 Plrks & Roc. 296.2 Majo< Cllculltion 214.7 _ToIIIl 1042.0 ~Futurw Urban 72.9 Pn>jICt ToIaIs 2121.8 . 8527 . ...... .... ... .._~... ~...........,.........-........ ..--.............. ~fASTLAKE . A PLAtND ~ITY IV EASTLAKE CEVEI.OfItoIINT co. ~!mi""" .... ._'" l J --..-... ~.. ,....1_.... .,101.' Exhibit 1 2"0 1i1 i <( ~~ .O..~.O.~.~~NI~"...~..o~...o.o -~ ~.ooo......... ~.~.N._.~..e ~ ~I -~- N - N ----w I 1""'1 --I a.. ;:, ....' I "":",:~.,~---:~~.,~q~~It!.~~.C!.,q--:~,,,,~~~~ NN~..~~~~~...h~~~.O.N"".O... 2 < - --- - o _ I ........oO........,...ft....IIft..........o........_ - ..-.ft~o..~..~-~o~..~oO~~~ft. S t:c --......--- ..-- --- ----- - :iI N - -J - .... ::> i .. .. I!:: E..., I ( ~ I :! r. t:'fiF ~ \J!I~ J ..,C!~q.-o:~CJtIlt!!~~~~~~~~-: _~.:~~ft:.."w--~ .~I~ - ~ i a I,I ... IJI 1'1 II, Ii I J I ~ ,.= II j 1 . ~I 1 ilftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftilftllftllftllftllftllftllftllftllft 11ft 1Ift1lft1lft1lft1lft_____________________e_ ooooo~~~~e~~~_~~_eeee~~~~~.e w -_._- ---- " i z-' c:( a) le ~il~~il~:~~U!~~:R! .~t~S!i Vf':,. R .... 1\iI" -., --.. Iii -' c,; c.. ~I o I ~:;::::::=::;:::::~:~~. ~:::=: Z\.I --- -: o =-\ J ~",,!~~~~h;~""~.~~~."~ "",:.,_~f't",_ ::! t;: e~;~~~=~.~::t::=R.:: :2~~~. , N - -' i= ., ::> :i n ClCICClClClCClClClClClClClCI~~~~~ ~~~~~CI~ C'l) .O-NC't.."........O-Nt't.."'..... I ~ jl ;:t~;~:~::;;;;;;;;;;~:t:t:t:t:t:t:t:t i CJ') "- .4 ~*'\.'I< .~,'~ . ~ t .. ~ ' o ~ 1 - i , J ~No-o.eO.-..ft...- .=.2=":.fiN~.....Iri,:; j i E ~I il~ I,! I ;: IJI 1 1'1 I u. I Jh · I lip! !ifJ, .1 . ~D. EJ' .~Ir.[ \)~l~ 4 ~ I~' : ~~-.. .--." i ~~n UJi6 UJu ~c ij5<.!) ~ , . ..' .. "'., . ',. . I .' . :.. '-t---. . . -,. - ... .L[:.j" , . '_~' ./_, t, .' _r._~:-~,\ \ ,i" '\.\ \ '.,' ,~ . \.\ \~..' ;\\ \ " lin \\ r;: ~ . \!'~ ~ - j ~ " " ...-:;:-:,.;; "~/..;/" I' =:::.:.: ...' ~'~, ,-, ( ..... .-....,. ~~ \,=- iY/ ,~, " II \ \ ....!=._ ... I;; ::--"0 ':' i~ -", If/ /.&_ -. '\~ . I \"'l.p' J "r... .." -1\ ~ \... .., q -.: I.~ ~Jt~).~ 1i=7 -- r ....., ~_ i -, r-~~ ,<-:::=1i::; ~ l. \ \ \' .~)\.. \', .., - ".... --J - _\\ -. \~. '\\ _-::::;;,==--- I \ - \\... "*~- - ,~ '7~ \ ,).., (it.~---" -~~~~.I,' - I ~:: .1!) ( ,;::=.~ ,) / ?'~... "'''' ' '1/ k?' I 11!:t';:L ~ I;'",. "'"'_ I ~ I / ) V \..., ) - __-a_ '-~ II / "~~/i<;. :;..........., ('" -..-",,1"- - __-a_ III /.....l{,~'-/ ....... J. i L:'~r-::~ _Jr \ :: ===:=. II ~ ,,1\_..\\ ~~' I L) -If -~, \ II - I\-"::" I .-/ -,' 110-10 _c..__-",-.._ ... I \I._J~ '...J _ ~II,..-_ \ -.. ----.- l' I.-'r~...... I"-...J!~" - IOC'" - ....0..'" ,......- _. /', 1t:!~I'f1 ~ItJF:-....,.;),\ _ "j~ 110-11 _.co.. "'12_ r''v'" r -1 , I r.....- ~ ^ .~.., _n - .....---..- I '''1- II " I .., l........,\ \....~~ / ...-J; \ -, r\\ 1.------'" ' , " ' - - .....---..- Ir--~ I ,\ ,_ ,\', ~.o\;:-.. ... .'( - I VUAGE CENTER 'I,,,, ,~, (_..~~~ '\) \) ,~, \~"".;,..~ ) 1-"---- I...~ .,...)" ~ ".: - }'-Q-~ ~ _. _ _ - _ ;oJ j..., -, I " ~.., \ 'u....,,-'l'7/ \\ .., \ , _a __-_ '\/ ~ ' ~ V / //\,_." ~ ~"""4 \ )... '. .~-..tENTER ~7. ~..,=~' >>~'" ~' ____o..r-~ _4f11rk-" ~~,~.... j" -=-. ____ c... - ----~ ....... __ ':",ooo""d'-- '" - ----:::;?" - Land Use . Districts Adopted RESIDENTIAL ::::: .-;. -. -. _I ..... - - -. .... .L. -oAL P.II'CISE '-' ...... t__ ---.- --..- a.. ........ IIIIMM __-a_ ---.- __-7_ --- ~E4STLAKE A ft.NHD CXM.t.HTY IV EASII.AICI CEVB.OPtttiNT CQ ---... _.,__t ~.-- _.._....'.m rJm:-'-' 7._~ Exhibit A r~ '( Land Use Districts '. Proposed --- ~v ~ L~:P en.] \~ ~"; -.,: '" p v _ I..JI ~ - l - I ... -i,f<"" -.: I.~ ~J~~).~ II,:- -- 7 ~'1J -is-~''_AP\~ .... ~"- ~Y"" _,\ .... \~~)\..'\\ - -..::..' - \~ \ - ....-,,~ . \ \ ... ;;.;?~ .... - ........~ -;'~ \ J..(~U/t:~~)'~1' _ I~ .11) ?-::ffj ;~; / r~.., T!/' :.. 11/ ?' / /1" "" ..., ~ .::~: II I --.....i/.;::/~-- -;,.-)-( f ~ \-y;" 1(/ (,....(I~:/\ ;' I a'""~ ,~ \ i \ - i\-"'l= f~.I (, .... ~" \ -'1:11 IL._J....'--- -~ _ ....-:1,,11 -;;:: \ I'-'r~ -..... ....---'!~ _ -, ", 1.....I'1)'~f^'-~~~\ """...JK" f -. 11---11 I (~- '-,~ -^ -, ....---..- , ':::1'1-- II " I -. \...~':'\ \..-~~ ;' -i; n -II' -r"",\\ ~" ' , " , VIJJGE~---"- 11r::-t~'J~_,~ \~~""~I ~\:~;;~ -JI ~' __-_ Ii~. ,~, , '\ ; \ ) - ') '-~~ ~ vc-. __-_ l'o! J..... """'d ,,. ~- \ \ i I h"I"~\ -. '\ VC-J __-_ V ~ VOl,. ~ ,,\..1....0'/ .....#\-.." - ,,~v ./h# \).... ."S"-~ CENTER ~ RS,. ~-L~~~/\,- "" r _ ~ 1-'1---'" . I -..-- ~", r',..# -. ------- "'~~ - ~~ RaAL F\RIOSE ~~ -_.,- ---.- ---.- ---.- ---.- ---.- --..- --- - - -. - .............. -- ---.- ----.- ----.- ::::: I'IESIDENTIAL II>tO __ 0...____- to__ ~1a ............... c.... ... 0In:I ~,. r Ad ~& lAM" ,. ... RC-II ........ c..._ .Jf+- 11__ ,-.;.. -. _. -. - 01-1 01-1 -. .... ~E4STLAKE A I'I.AfHD co.MNTY Ir IASn.AICE ~ CQ -..-... -..--. ---- _..~ ... rJ~ --_I .._~ 1110111 Exhibit A Second Addendum to FSEIR 86-04 (B) m. CHANGES IN IMPACT ANALYSIS 4 The project site has be graded for sometime and this minor shift in land uses and minor modifications to densities will not result in any change in the natural environment. the provision of public facilities was programmed in the original EastLake GDP/SPA at a specific density. The minor reduction and density shifts that part of this proposal would not significantly impact the provision of these services. the minor reduction in population would result in a commensuration reduction in related impacts. IV. CONCLUSION Pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby find that the project revisions to the proposed project will result in only minor technical changes or additions which are necessary to make the previously sited FEIR adequate under CEQA. V. REFERENCES EIR-96-04 EastLake Greens EIR-96-04 (A) Addendum IS-96-04 EastLake Greens GPA/SPA Modification General Plan, City of Chula Vista Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code City of ChuJa Vista Environmental Review Procedures ..,:f)rr/ir.otrr/ I~ C<>nlln"nil~ grllir'f 10615 JAMACHA IOULEVNU>, IPAING ~Y. CAlIFORNIA ,urn TELEPHONE: 170-2222. AREA CODE 118 r:;,"-:",,-,,__ '.'. -.... n,-. -.. ~-....~. ...~. -, OCTO 4 199~ lJ - L"i.'.: .. I ~ VXA FAX "1-5171 , 0.8. lIa11 1995 Mr. Douglas D. Reid Environmental Coordinator City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 91912-1087 .e: Proposed Amendment to the Adopted BastLake IX General Development Plan (GDP), .elated to the .astLake Greens and an Amendment to the 8PA Plan, and the Tentative Tract lIap (ZS-"-05). Dear Mr. Reid: The otay Water District (OWD) would like to have ample opportu- nity to review and respond to any environmental documentation (Negative Declaration or EIR) relating to the above referenced project. OWD may have site needs for the future 711-3 reservoir and other water facilities as well, thus requiring the site(s) and pipeline routes to be called out on any adopted EastLake II General Development Plan (GDP). Please contact me at 670-2293 or John Garcia at 670-2213 if you need any information or have any questions with regard to water facilities or service. We look forward to reviewing and res- ponding to your completed environmental Initial Study/Negative Declaration or Draft EIR. Sincerely, ~-la~S ~ Environmental Specialist &--,-- . MFC:cp cc: Tim Stanton Jim Peasley John Garcia Chris Craven Rebecca Patton Sweetwater Union High School District Admlnlstradon Center 1130 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista, ullfomla 91911-2896 (619)691-5500 -';'.-' DIvision ofPbnnlnl ~nd F~dlldes Ms. Barbara Reid CItY of Chula Vista Planning Departml'nt 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Ms. Reid: Re: Proposed East/3ke Gener31 Development PI3n Ch3nges The Sweetwater Union High School Dlstrla does not obJea to the proposed amendments to the East Lake II General Development Plan. Community Facilities Dlstrla No. 1 (CFD No.1) was established to mitigate this project's Impacts to schools. However, thank you for the nottncatlon, It Is good that the district Is kept Informed of these changes. #- Thomas Sliva Director of Planning TS/ml ATTACHMENT 5 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT 'IRE C . OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE S1 'WENT You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g" owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY 2, If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. BOSWELL PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED TULAGO COMPANY 3, If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. N/A 4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No_ If yes, please indicate person(s): 5, Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter, GARY CINTI - CINTI LAND PLANNING BILL OSTREM - EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT ROGER BHATIA - RICK ENGINEERING CO. BRUCE SLOAN - EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT TOM ADLER - EASLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO. 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes_ No XX If yes, state which Councilmember(s): , , , (NOTE: Attach additional pages as ~.. ' , , ~ ,/ ~ Signature of con a r/applicant Date: WILLIAM T. OSTREM Print or type name of contractor/applicant . !:E!l!!!! is dcfUJed QS: "AllY individua~ jinn, co-pannership, jow ~ tlSsodtUion, social club, frc:..I'tW orgtlIUzodon, cOrpDTadon, crtate, trust, receivrr, syrulicak, aw alld D19' other county, city and cowU7); dry municipality, district, or olher political subdivision, or any 0lMr /1"OUP or combinoliOl'l acting Q3 Q unit"