HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/09/27 (2)
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1
Meeting Date: 9/27/95
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing:
Eastlake Greens
Financing Plan
SPA Amendment, PCM-95-11 Amendment to the
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Public Facilities
The Eastlake Greens SPA project consists of approximately 830 Acres, located south of
Telegraph Canyon Road, westerly of Hunte Parkway. The future alignment of SR-125 provides
the westerly boundary, as the Future Orange Avenue provides the southerly boundary (see
locator). The initial SPA plan was approved in 1989, for 2774 dwelling units and assorted other
uses, including commercial, schools and parks. A subsequent SPA amendment in 1994 changed
the configuration of the southerly portion of the property and increased the unit count to 2861
dwelling units. When the 1994 amendment to the SPA was approved, the Public facilities
Financing Plan (PFFP) was not modified to reflect the changes. However, a condition was
placed on the Tentative Map requiring that the PFFP be updated prior to approval of any Final
Subdivision maps for areas affected by the modification.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-94-19 of possible
environmental impacts associated with the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and
comments thereon, The Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that there would be
no significant environmental effects and, therefore recommends adoption of the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-94-19.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution
PCM-95-11 recommending that the City Council approve the project in accordance with the
attached draft City Council Resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
The Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) is a technical document that is supplementary to the
SPA documents for a Planned Community, such as Eastlake Greens. As such, approval of the
document does not confer any additional entitlements or involve any new concepts. The PFFP
provides a comprehensive listing of public facilities to be provided, in part or in entirety, by the
project. Major components of the PFFP consist of:
Page 2, Item 1
Meeting Date 9/27/95
1. phasing proposed for the project.
2. a listing of facilities proposed with each phase
3. Estimated cost of the facility, or the project's share
4. Alternative methods of financing available.
The identified facilities may be offsite, as well as onsite. Examples of offsite facilities might be
schools or road improvements. Additionally, the project may only be required to participate on
a fair share basis as opposed to the requirement to construct the listed facility. Examples of this
might be Mello-Roos districts or payment of Development Impact fees.
In 1989, the City Council approved the SPA plan for the Eastlake Greens, including the PFFP.
Since that time, the Chula Vista General Plan has been amended to include other major
projects, such as Sunbow, Salt Creek Ranch, Kaiser Hospital, Rancho del Rey and the Otay
Ranch. Also, many changes have occurred in the City's approach to the planning and provision
of facilities. The City has adopted Development Impact Fees for transportation and sewage
facilities, including an interim SR-125 fee. The City has established a Growth Management
process, and developed legal threshold requirements. In some cases, this has affected the
proposed approach to financing these facilities.
In 1994, the Eastlake Greens SPA plan was modified to include additional land resulting from
a land swap between Eastlake and the Otay Ranch. Among other things, this land swap resulted
in realignment of the proposed location of Orange A venue between Eastlake and the Otay Ranch.
This update to the PFFP reflects reconfiguration of land uses and associated facilities as
approved in the 1994 SPA amendment.
The current proposed update to the Eastlake Greens PFFP contains many facilities that have
already been constructed, primarily in conjunction with the northerly portion of the Greens
project. Attachment "4" contains a list summarizing the facilities remaining to be constructed
to accommodate the Eastlake Greens Project.
Facilities on the list generally fall within one of two basic categories of improvements:
I. Improvements necessary to provide access or services to the homes being
constructed within the Greens.
2. Improvements of a regional nature which require some measure of participation
by the Greens.
Attachment "A" contains a column which identifies the category for the remaining facilities
(category 1 is labeled "G" for "Greens" and category 2 is "R" for regional requirement.
Construction of regional facilities are generally not required for the Greens, unless they are
Page 3, Item 1
Meeting Date 9/27/95
necessary to overcome certain threshold deficiencies. Exceptions to this are facilities (generally
streets) necessary for access, which also provide regional benefit, such as Hunte Parkway and
Eastlake Parkway. Generally, category 2 requirements are met through payment of Development
Impact Fees.
Portions of Eastlake Parkway, Hunte Parkway and East Orange A venue are in a special category
in that they are not required to provide access to the project, but are (at this point) required to
be constructed by the project. In the case of Orange Avenue (from Hunte Parkway to the
easterly subdivision boundary) and in the case of Hunte Parkway (from South Greensview Drive
to East Orange Avenue), these projects were originally required of the Tentative Map in 1989.
At that time, major projects were required to construct all major roads within or abutting the
project boundaries. With the advent of development impact fees, this would no longer be a
requirement, since the cost of the facility will now be paid by collection of fees. Eastlake has
chosen to keep the requirements on this project at this time because they anticipate processing
another SPA amendment for the Eastlake Greens in the near future, and may require those roads
to meet threshold standards. If that turns out not to be necessary, they may request a
modification to the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map to remove the requirement to
construct those roads. Eastlake Parkway, from the southerly SPA boundary to East Orange
Avenue is proposed for inclusion in the PFFP for the same reason.
The PFFP also provides updated figures on existing and proposed parks and recreational
facilities planned within the Eastlake Greens SPA. It clarifies that the figures are for net useable
rather than gross acres and also that the maximum credit for private parks is 50 %, but may be
less, subject to review and approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation. There is also a
notation that the developer is required to provide 7 additional acres arising from separate
development agreements which are not reflected in the figures. A portion of these additional
7 acres will be provided in The Greens and other phases of development (EastLake III).
Attachments:
1. Locator
2. Planning Commission Recommending Resolution
3. Draft City Council Resolution
4. Exhibits
5. Eastlake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan
6. Initial Study and Negative Declaration
7. Disclosure Statement
(m: \home\planning\pffp. cst)
PROJECT
LOCATION
Lower Otay ReseNoir
ATTACHMENT 1
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT EASTLAKE DESCRIPTION,
C) APPLICANT: DEVELOPMENT CO. Miscellaneous:
PROJECT Eastlake Greens Request: To amend the EasUaka Greens SPA (Sectional Planning
ADDRfSS,
Area) and the PFFP (Public Facilities Financing Plan).
SCALE, FILE NUMBERo
NORTH No Scale PCM . 95 - 11
ATTACHMENT 2
PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-95-11
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE
GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC
FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL ADOPT THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-19
WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study
IS-94-19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from amendment
of the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has held a Public Hearing and taken testimony;
and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and amend
the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
City CounciL
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this day of by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William Co Tuchscher II, Chainnan
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(m: \homc\planning\pcm9511.pcr)
ATTACHMENT 3
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY
COUNCIL APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
EASTLAKE GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC
FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND ADOPTING THE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-l9
WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study IS-94-
19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from amendment of the
Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held a Public Hearing on September 27, 1995
and voted to recommend that the City Council approve the amendment of the Eastlake Greens
Sectional Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan; and
WHEREAS, The City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment and
notice of said hearing, together with its purpose was given by it publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.,
October 10, 1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and
said hearing was closed; and
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby adopts
the Negative Declaration IS-94-l9 and approves the amendment of the Eastlake Greens Sectional
Planning Area Public Facilities Financing Plan.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(m:\home\planning\pcm9511.ccr)
ATTACHMENT 4
EXHIBITS
c
C
III
E
GI
0::
J!I
u
GI
o
...
11.
c::
'u
c::
..
c::
ii:
....
o
..,
o
~
-
'"
-0
I::
o
aJ
I::
o
~
.~
:c
OIL
roO
Qj m
I:: 3:
., .,
<.?en
:;;
I::
.2
ro
ii5
a.
E
::J
D-
J~
';:
"
UI
'"
o
~
.,
3:
"-0
en I::
., 0
"" >-
"'E
~-c
~ ffi
- >-
~~
'0 ro
~>
'" >-
oJ)J
1::0
,Q 0
15:::
- .,
en 3:
a..,
Een
::J ~
D- '"
w:g
3: '"
"en
en_
., 0
'" ::J
",b
~ ~
o 0
EO
I
<.?D::
;UI
o c::
Z '"
.'"
. ~
2<.?
D.. '
Z
"'",
&JeD
....
'" '"
Uloo
~eD
D..
uu
';:: "I::
t)t)
is is
'"
.,
.,
IL
""
~
'"
D-
cc
., .,
E E
'" '"
'" '"
., .,
'" '"
'" '"
~ ~ C
ILlLo
aa~
I:: I:: X
OoW
~ ~ c:
m ~ t.Q
Q) 0 0 .~
LL a.a.>
~~~:c
m~~.g
D-f-f-en
COO
o ";:: ";::
~t)t)
~iSiS
'u +J c
t ffi Q)
'" E E
a. '" '"
~ '" '"
., ., .,
a. '" '"
0",,,,
CD~~5
~i5i5~
U) c c ~
~ 0 0 W
a.:.;:::; :.;:: c
rJ)~~.Q
:R 0 0 .!:a
LL g- g-.~
~c::c:"C
m~~.g
D-f-f-en
I:: I::
o 0
:.;:::; :.;:::;
o 0
'" '"
x x
WW
I:: I::
o 0
'00 '00
:~ :~
-0 -0
.c .c
::J ::J
en en
~
~
o
'm I-
:2 0
'2'0) ~ 1:)
.~ c: co ~
~; -g "8
Q) - 5 ~
ffi <V .Q ~ _'"
-> <(co
:!-<( a.."O ~
...:~'2' enS ;:
Oco ~B Q)
~ '0 I... 'S;
3:0~ m<e (l)ro
Q) (I) c.. c:
--000 men Q)~
~mO ?::>, ~
c: W Q) O"'i:: C!).9
Q) 0 c: +-" Q) Q)
w.......J2 ~1i5 0015
(5"':N ~Q) c:
c-:-~a.;:c:.92
~ ~ ~ ro ~ .9 .Q c5 :tU.
+-,.s:~a..C:fen!9 -
Q) rJ) a.. Q) ~ ~ ...:
fJJ c: Q) ro I =,0
::]0>_> _a.c.o~
o Q) C:.- Q) (l) E..c >
..c ,'n. :J a. > ... :J ..c Q)
'7 ..c u :::r: - <( c: a.. ~ ':;:
a..~cri.9,,?Q):fI...O~
~"-' .....: a.. ~ - Q) E CD
~EEo -"," 3: o!'!
>U 0 0 ~.... > Q) I-
0..':::':::;:000<((1)-(9
"8 ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (5 ~
.,g~~~!::wffi<(oo
I... a.. a.. Q) Q) _ I..... Q) -c
~~~~0~S5~>2
OJ:J:J ..c"'~~-o
'IDI:r::u:i "5-CwOU5 a.
z...............Ow..............+-'
Q) g g g en B g g g g
> l:;J::;", b", Q) mz.b.bJ::;",
o rJ) -c "C 00 rJ) rJ)
I.... c: c: c: c: c: c: c:
a. 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0
.sOOO<.?<.?OOOO
'"
,
D-
o,{
~
'"
D-
-0
o
o
~
o
.c
J::
Q)
'0;
Z
.,
-0
~
<.?
<.?
<.?<.?D::<.?<.?D::D::<.?<.?<.?
N
:g..c m..c.,......cm.a",," m..c
ca~RRt--~~~r--:e:e
~
D..
I::
o
~
a.
'0
t
'"
a.
c
.,
E
'"
~ '"
., .,
a. '"
o '"
<Dc::!;
> 0 IL
~~(5
en ~ I::
..2wo
c..1::~
'" 0 '"
:E :~ "5
lJ.. .~ g-
-c:81::
m :J ~
D-enf-
o
'2"(ij'
o~
""",
., .,
= I::
8.!!!
.,'<t
1::-
l!!~
~~
., I::
> ::J
~.L:: B
~O
'" 0 <(
D--oD-
.,,,,en
mQj~
.f: ~ Q>
a. en J::
;;;.sg
a.. Q) f/}
~.~ 0
"" ~-
m 0 >-
D- 3: '"
'" .~ ~
I:: > ~
., '" '"
., I:: D-
~ ., .,
"~~
J::<.?'"
:; ~
O(f)~
en"
Q):JO
> ~ :J
o en .b
~ I:: '"
0.00
.sOO
<.?<.?<.?
'"
~m.c(()
ta~~1'-
~
D..
"
.;:
t)
is
oCt
t:
r;g
:J:
)(
w
uu
.C :s
t) '"
is is
1:: 1:: I::
., ., 0
:t::EEt5
m en en m
U5 en en X
., ., .,
~ ~ ~ I::
Q ~ ~"~
"O"OLLlJ..-
55(5(5~
lJ..LL I:: I::.g
rn rn .Q .Q en
1::1::---
.2> "2> ~ ~ L1..
enenooo
ooc..c..L...
ij:ij:~~Q)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f-f-f-f-en
Q)
I::
'1i
a.
o
J::
en
'"
N
'"
a::
I::
o
>-
I::
'"
o
>-
.c '"
I:: 0
o "i'
>- '"
ffi "O~
0-0 ~e
..c: m c::: I::
c..O ajl:: 0
m c::: 0 >-
t>> I:: ~ ~ I::
~ g, ., '" rJ
~ I:: tnO ..c:
r-ml::..c:Q.
1::0~a.~
O..c:O~tn
.11 c.. _ tn Q)
m~~lI12
E ~w ~ I::
~Q).9Q).m
o ~ >-= E
L... C m I:: .,~
E~ ~.;;; 3:
=~m1::Q)
m tn Q.. (I.J en
I:: .- E ]1
_.2>(f) ~ Q)
c: f/} 0 m > ~
OOI.i::+=,om
+:;ij:ti;ena.a.
ca m L... m E -
c.. L... I- w 0
'CjI-Q)"O-2
.- = E I:: -'"
1:: S "- Q) rn c
!E&~~8
.,
Q)
I::
'"
J::
e
OJ
5
D::D::D::D::D::
UI
II> '"
]i~
;z:: .u
o ..
IL.
I'-COmON
I'- I'- I'- co co
en 0) ;F- CD
100
C C 00:> a:~
U1N "r "
.- oct. ;Rd: ::> r-, ~
Q) en a: ~
c: LL ID ~
o ._ ~~
Q) a3 -6 --00 ~ CD ~
(')N ~L{)~ N t: ~
1- , ' , , Q.)~
~ .s::. a:d: a:oa: a: ID '-I~'(
(J)a: ..... <::.. ~
VJ - c: "i:: S
(L lrflrf ~- -NCD M a:s .- x \)~:~
N~ <';J(T)..,.....,...- N .c~ ><
.s::. ,.- , C\I a:ci:ci:ci: , W
...... a:d: C') a: 0.... a: ~j ~
...... () Q.) W Q.)w 00 Q.)oo
::J <D CJ) -a; CJ)~ Q.) -a;
0 a:s 0 (J) 0 ...-Q)
.--' ~ a:sio a:sio :::Je
0 .c ra I"-
(j) D.. ..cD.. ..cD.. ......&
1- 0.... 0.... 0.... :::J
(L u.. a.
. . . . . . . . . II 0 a3
......- ........ ~
.-......
........
....... ........
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
.........
....
..... .....
.
.;,
o
LIJ'" ~~
~Z-~
q:W j~
--'LIJ ~B
Ui~ ~l
~(!)
W
""I
<i>
iJ
_ se,./;s
~--
. "
~ ~
ATTACHMENT 5
EASTLAKE GREENS
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
EASTLAKE GREENS
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
Strikeout/Redline Draft
Text Reffio'(ed/'I!ii~tlgu,oo
1~~~I.i;l~!YI!.$m~.n~I!;~fl~~II;~~II~ill!nt
................................-. -----------.-
June 7, 19891!~~~RW~~~~g
Prepared by:
JAY KNIEP LAND PLANNING
(916)-541-1817
g.~lli~Qg;'i;~~;;IR!t!l?;i;;;;lllllil'111t'1I111Irll
f(iffl4~t~~~~Q~!fifij!1~$;"""""""""""""""'" ..................... .
(i{~!3M~!!)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
-EASTLAKE GREENS-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
Page
I. Introduction
A. Background and Regulatory Context. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. I
R Purpose .................................2
Co Key Assumptions ........................... 3
D. Consistency............................... 7
E. Regulation of Development .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
ll. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Requirements
for Future Development
A. III"'elltory of Needed Facilities .................. 10
B. Summary of Projects of I3astLake Creells ........... 30
Co EastLake Greens Phasing ..................... 44
D. Summary of Costs to Buildout ............ _ . . . .. 47
ill. Public Facilities Phasing and Requirements for Development
A. EastLake Greens Project Phasing ................ 48
R Phasing Program for Regional
Tftlftspeftfttiell Facilities ..................... 49
~;IRljimgRiilmf~tIJ!il$l!m~:fiI~j~ljIi;j!jIII.fji~II"!iijiIljlij49
IV. Public Facilities and Infrastructure Financing
A. Overview............................... 53
R Review of Financing Programs Available
and in Place in Plan Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 57
V. Implementation Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 61
(9~?3~?j!~)
II
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(continued)
APPENDIX
A. Bast CiUlla Vista TffiIISj!eFtaaeR PhasiRg PlaJI
B. TkresholalStandafEls Peliey Datoo Ne'telReer 17, 1987
FIGURES Pa!!e
L Vicinity Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
~;tm~~~~i.!t~;m~~i~iti!~t~ill~\!~!!~.~jt~~!~i~!~ii!.!!~~
TABLES
L Improvement Phasing Status ................... 48
2. RegioRal TraJIspertatioR Faeilities m!Ptl1l,.!i!!~~~150
EXHIBITS
A. Circulation Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
B. Domestic Water Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 14
Co Reclaimed Water Plan ........................ 16
D. Wastewater Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18
E. Stormwater Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . .. 21
F. Parks Plan .......... _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
MAPS
L
2.
3.
4.
5.
~M
6V;.
7.
~9.ii Greens Oft Site Improvements Phl!:Je 1 .........
Ni)Ht! Greens OR Site Improvements Phase 1 (cont) .....
~u1!1 Greens OR Site Improvements-Phase ~ i . . . . . . . .
~utb Greens OR Site Improvements-Phase ~ ~ . . . . . . . .
I'~~ii.'~_~~~i_i~iii~!iiiijjiijj
Eastlake Greens Phasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
RegioRa! TraJISj!ertatiEIR Facilities _...............
32
33
35
38
40
.111
46
52
(9~WM'I1~)
iii
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. BACKGROUND and REGULATORY CONTEXT
This Public Facilities Financing Plan ("PFFP") is a required element of the Planned Community
District Regulations adopted for the EastLake Planned Community. More specifically, the
District Regulations require that a Public Facilities Financing Plan be approved by the City of
Chula Vista prior to or concurrent with the adoption of a Sectional Planning Area ("SPA") Plan
for an area within the EastLake Planned Community.
PrayisioRs of the aFaft Eastem Temteries TffiflsportatieR PhasiRg Plan ("TPP") have BeeR
iReOFf'emte8 iRte tllis P!lBlie Faeilities FiR81Ieiag Plan se thllt the p\iBlie facilities lIfta
iRfrastruet'life reflliirelRCflts fer f!lmre de'/eloplRCflt OORtlliRe6 iR Chapter II lIereiR, life lak-eR iRte
eORsideftllioR.
Figures I and 2 are a Vicinity Map and a Project Component Map, respectively, illustrating the
location of the project in the City of Chula Vista and as part of the Eastern Territories of the
City of Chula Vista (that area generally easterly of Interstate 805).
On February 19, 1985, a Public Facilities Financing Plan for the initial development phase of
the EastLake Planned Community, known as EastLake I, was adopted by the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista as an element of the related SPA document. SPA #1 is EastLake I
<r~i!!~~!i:~ Hills and !t~~tI~ Shores) and SPA #2 is EastLake Greens. This document is
ilJ.telJ.dedto address publiCfiidlity needs associated with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
1\1111111Irllll_rdlilli1IrAlfl1111111111111
(9~!~HiI~)
B. PURPOSE
The Public Pllcilities Finllficing PIlln is intended to idcntify the VMio!!s pllBlic fllcilities reqllired
to slIpport the planned de'ielopmeAt of EastLakc Grccns (SP f. tt2) and to eAs!!re that these Pllblie
facilities lire provided lit the time they are Aeeded. IA so doiAg, tAe PUB lie Faeilities FinllAcing
PlaA dcsigAates not only on site p!!blic facility needs but Illso endeavors to address regional or
Ilfell '.vide impr-ovemellts by its Ildoption of the facilities alld phasing previsiolls Ilfid Feqllirements
of the East Chllla Vista Transportation Phasing PlaR, Reeded to serve eumlllativc plwmed growth
.....ithin adjacellt MetiS.
Regarding required public facilities, the Public Facility Financing Plan identifies a preliminary
cost estimate for each improvement as well as funding sources appropriate for the type of public
facility involved.
The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to be a dynamic and flexible document. The
goal of the Financing Plan is to assure adequate levels of service are achieved for all public
(Q8f3lP.l~)
2
facilities impacted by the project. It is understood that assumed growth projections and related
public facility needs are subject to a number of external factors such as the state of the economy,
the City's future land use approval decisionS", etc. It is also understood that the funding sources
specified herein may change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements
of either state or federal law. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding pro-
grams be handled as administrative revisions, whereas revisions to the facilities-driven growth
phases are to be accomplished through a Public Facilities Financing Plan update process, as set
forth n!sm in the deyelepmellt agreement.
C. KEY ASSUMPTIONS
There are a number of key assumptions implicit to this Public Facilities Financing Plan. The
assumptions playa major part in determining public facility needs, the timing of those needs and
the staging of growth corresponding to the various facilities. Key land use and phasing
assumptions can be summarized as follows:
I. SPY^. #lllfie SPf. #2 are illitial eevelepment phllses of the 32001. aere EastLake PlllAlled
Community to be developed within the City of Chula Vista. Subjeet to GeRemI. PlaH
Upelltc efferts (oRgoing at the time of tilis writing) llIIe future growth mllllagemellt
elltitlement eeeisiens by tHe vanaus juriseietiollal agencies invelved, tile EastLake PlllAned
Commllnity is IlIItieipate6 to be implelflelltcd iR pha3Cs generally oonsistent 'i'litil
infarlfllltion previded Herein as Appelldix P.. THis informatian represents fsrlflal inpllt
giveR to tHe vmous jurisdietional llgeReies by Ea3tLake Development CompllfiY to
faeilitate f-lieility mllster plllARing efforts in terms of !!fell 'uide and/or long term public
facility needs.
2. Lane IiSC alloeation and intensity is regulated by beth Planned Cemmlinity Diatriet
Reglllations llAe SPA PIIlfi ese!lmellts. The CelleraI De'ielepment PIllA ane related SFt.
PIIlfi, adopted by the City 6f CAlIlll Vista 6n _, _ and _, re3peetively, regulate
the develapmellt of the SPf. Plllfi 1!fe!I.
(9~{~l!!l~)
3
Del Mar
t
~
NO SCALE
~
Rancho
Sante fe
+
"
,
Poway\
\
.,
I
I
:+
f
'.
~..
\,
~
'"
<).
EASTLAKE I
EASTLAKE
GREENS
+
1
I
+'
--{
X,
,
c
o
M
E
VICINITY MAP
FIGURE 1
WILLDAN/SIMPSON
\
I"
11
g) @
] ~
._ u
...... .
.c:: g
0"" ~
z EJ "'",
0 ~O>
"'~
(/) ",0
,M
Z "'~
.. '"
~ I- >>
" () ""
., X a: a:
~~ W
0., - W ...,
.c_ " " " - 0
(J)" ""
W .., W W., " w a:
:,,:: ,,0 ~ :~ :"::_0 ::.::: Il.
<( = " <( ~~ <(~O <(
...J "" ...J ell- ...J>;:.c -I Z
a:
I- .. I- """ 1-""",(1) ~
(I) ~" (I) .... (I) ., .. () I-
.... <( 0
< c." <(c.c. <Co.Q.~
W(J)m W(J)(J) W(J)(J)O W Z
t5~
Q)e:
.~ Q)
ee:
a.. 0
Q.
E
o
()
o
z 1.....1
w '.....
(!) .....i
w .....i
..J 1.....1
I- . . . .1
I- - - - -,
. . . .~
.. . . .
~!....
I:::::::!
........'
,........
~: : : : : : :
1.......1
~:::::::::::::j
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...............
...........n..
...............
...............
,.........=
--~--
..' ~ ,. ' u/,\\," -: '),1 ~"
,.,.1,>>_- ".....,~ >i'.r.;;., . .
" ...... ,.r;;.."--..... . _.....,
~'<1l...... .:.............: _.._.z.....;.'
,... 'V........ ............. ~ ~'........ ."..'
/.............. .................. .-r......... ,.-"
. . ., ( ~ ~~~~~~~~~~. ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~;.;;.-
..~. ~"f'fK J.. ... ........... ... 0..........,,,...
.0. ..\1:. .... ........... '0' .............
.,.(~.. ........ /.... .!!? ........... ......... ........
/..... . (I) .0. ... ........... ........,.--'
.......... ..... t... > ........... .....~.-"'"
........"C ....... t.... ........... ........
.:::::::::: 0 :::::::\ rX,:::::::...... .....
........... 0.........).. /
..........:
'j
,
"
"
o
u
i
i
i
L.._.._..
I-
Z
w
UJ!
~~
~I
lni
~~
~._- ~
l'
'0.
'"
i"
~
o
~
z
<(
.....J
a..
z
o
-
t;:
KI
-
.....J
-
I-
::>
ill
I-
-
C/)
-. ~
~ .O(J)..,.\t)CClO(D\t)<O""MNQ)II'I~""""aoCl)O_""fDC:CO"'O
t!:5 1t)""~22caco(J)""~ID(J)~CDfD ~CD~:!.~.:!N"'''''fD''''CO :;;
'"
EJ . '"
~O>
~~
Q.g
A;;;
~ '-I~'~ >
" 1Ji &
... ~.
CD ~t
'"
.-
-'I
u
...m
C'i";
"
- i
u u )J Ct)
m m
'"
.,; C':i l~ Q)
. '" ,of .....
CD J! I :J
B~ 0)
Ij ~ LL
"liE :!!
.P~
iii ,q!! .
.~ dn
1& ()
~ B II
., i "I
i '0'
.. d: : ;;t
u
m
.i,...,...oMco-comC")..,.o\t)C")\t)(DmNcccoC")o_MNlI'IlI'Imc:c ~
~CNN~..~~~~~~~~~~~~~OmNMMmci..m
t!.! ... --- .... :
.
e
u
c
u
m
,...,...ccOO..,.,.......II'I....COMco..,.COIt),...mm,...OccccO....Mm_
m.~.M~ci~m~..N~~cimm.~cici~~~Mm~ .
--NNN___ ""--(\1---(\1 ----- .... M
.
. COMCClNO_CCIt)Om_mOOMmm..,._
f mN.mci~M~.MN~~~m.~ci~
~ __ ..,.-- .... ~oo
..
i- 1t)1I'I1I'I1I'I1t)1t)1t)1t)1t)1t)1I'I1I'I1I'I1t)1t)1I'I1I'I1t)1I'I1t)1I'I 11'1
Ccll'lll'lll'l\l)\I)---------....-----------II'I-
~~o6666~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~6~
,g,g '0 ~~~~
~~ ~~~~~~ c
~~~ U~~~~~ ~
~~~_0~oooo~emmmmm ~
c::o~~oooouuuouou:~
m~~c~=~~~~cccmccc~u
oO"''''~-o _0 '-0 Q.a.o.a.Q.Q.Q.;).!::
_ Oc ~o ~0W0W0000
&gUWce ~~~iccccccco~
c-='&:;; '"&OI'tiiOl=c=====:=O
_.......2'.!! 0........ c.c.c.c.c.c.C.Om
>~~~WOZZZZOOOOOOO~~
:e:
JJcccccccccccccccQQQQQQQQQQccQ
Ji i 01(01(<01(01(<<<<< <
(ij ~~
:;:; .. .
C -j . O....C\lt")..,.lt1te.....CDO)O....C\lt")..IlH,O.....CCI 'ii
CD e ....C\lC?....lt1te.....CClm....................-_........_C\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\IC\I S
~t. rra:ri::a:rra:a:rra:.a:a:a:a:a:a:a:ri::ci:a:a:a:rrrra:a:ri:a:a: i
a:
.
- .
"'=>
:0::11
C.
OJ...
"0
.0.1........C\I ....C\lC?....:nte.....
a:Q) e . OO'7~'7f':1C?~"?,j,,j,,j,q,chchch
I t. a..o..cnCf)a..a..a..a..a..ooooooo
C
o
z
,
/-
wU'1 ~i
~zf~
Swu;
L-Wb
r-= C=:: <
"'(!)
~
~
D. CONSISTENCY
The provisions of the Public Facilities Financing Plan are, to the extent practical, consistent with
and reinforce certain other public documents. More specifically, consistency with the following
documents has been addressed in the context of this Public Facilities Financing Plan:
I. The Public Facility Finlllleiflg PIIlII adapted far tile iRitial pHase of the EastLake PlllIIned
Comlflllnity, i.e. the EastLake I P!llJlie Faeilities FiRanciHg Plan.
2. THe EastLakc CreeRs LR'iiranmelltal Impaet Report, as certified by tHe City of Chula Vista
on The 'imOUS mitigation measures pertailliHg ta publie faeilities are
iHtegrated hereiH.
3. The City of CHlIla Vista Interim De..eloplfleHt Ilflpaet Pee pfOgfllm fur streets. The
Development Iml"aet Fee (DIF) program is a fURdiRg progffllfl for arterial high'uays and
inel!ldes thc SPA ttl IlIId SPf. #2 areas, as well liS other eevelopmellt areas, witHin tHe
defilled "lJeflefit" area.
1. The Rancho eel Rey SPf. I Publie Faeilities PIllA and Filllllleillg f.llalysis as aeapted b)'
the City of Chllla Vista in October, 1987. IlItemal eORsisteRcy regar-diRg area wide p!lblic
facility treatlflents Me obligations is addressed.
5. The East Ch!llll Vista TfIlH3portation PHasing PllIR (TPP), II eoellmellt requiring the
pIHtsHlg ef public iRfrastrueture 'Iiith growth iR the Eaatem Territeries, is incerperated
herein as f.ppeReix A. This P!lblie Faeilitics FinMeing pIllA ineorptjffites tI1e phasing and
faeility Feq!liremelits and limitations of tHe TPP llAe iReludes interpreti'ie provisions te
explaiR the mllfiller iR ',\'Hieh the prajeets speeifie IlAd !!fell speeific req!liremellts and
lilflitatioRS lIpen tHe pHasing of de'ieloplfleHt !!fC accomplisHed.
6. Rcsollltion No. 13346 of the City COlllleil of the City of Chula Vista adoptiflg
thrcsHold/staneards !lntil a gre....'th mllllagemellt campoflcnt of the Ceneral PIIIR is a60pted.
ApplicatioR of the ..mOilS "tI1reaho18s" currently established is aelffiewledged by tHe
req!liremcnts HereiR tilat speeified public facilities must be "Ilssmoo" prior to tAe
commencement of t-ke lIext ineremellt af eevelopmeRt. The adopted thresholes are
eontaifled herein in f.ppendix D.
7. The "IRterim Flleilities Pinlllleing Agreement" between tHe City of Ch!llll Yistallfie tHe
EastLake De'/elopmellt CompllfiY appro'ied Dcceffiber 17, 19E5 by Resolution No. 12307
ane EXHibit "A" te tHe Interim Agreement Ilppraved by Rcsol!ltioll Ne. on MareH 11,
1986. These eacuments pro'iieed fer interim Development Impact Fees for EaatLake's
sH!!fe of on and off site p\:lblie faeilities includiHg streets, SR 125 interim faeility, fire
statioll, librMy, IlIId p!!fks.
8. The SupplelflcRtaI DeveloplfleRt Impact Fee programs. The City is prepmRg a sche6l1le
of fees for '/ariouS public flleilities otHer than sti'eets. WHen adopted by the City, tHe fees
'uill be reqllired from eeyelopment withiR EastLak-e GrccRs.
(9~{~J{~~)
7
2;
. fi~tt;tff~1~~t;~C~~S~::t~~F;::~;~r~~:~fit
in . the p,oje6ts herein:,
3,. . . ~=~~=t~~i~p~ht;:~~~ft::;~~~~t~:;pi:~ a~:t~6;?~ati~~sistency..with..these
4. Tbe~l\.Ula ViSti\.;GrQV{ih Management Program iricluding the threshold:; staridarqs; as
descnbedaboveID .SectionA,
5. . Theeity . of Ghula Vista Development Impact Fee (DIF) programs.
E. REGULATION of DEVELOPMENT
As referenced above, this Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to serve as the basis for
reviewing public facility requirements associated with localized development phasing and,
thereby, provide a means to insure that public facilities are installed in a timely manner. With
this in mind, a series of development "phases", or sequential bllilding perlflit thresholds, have
been keyed to specific public facility improvement projects such that public facility improvement
sequence and related funding assurances can be paced with growth within EastLake Greens and
the EastefH Territories 9!9~ri'ifil\1YP!Pj!i9t$.
For each public facility identified, a certain status of implementation is specified for threshold
monitoring purposes. Generally speaking, public facilities located on-site and off-site must be
"committed" in the manner specified herein in a particular phase or increment of development
prior to building permits being issued iff subsequent phas~.
When "Commitment" of required improvements necessitates condemnation of land off-site of
EastLake Greens, the obligation to start construction may be waived if improvement plans are
finalized for approval, a condemnation proceeding has been initiated and estimated funds for
right-of-way acquisition and construction have been deposited with the City in the form of cash,
bonds, a letter of credit or other acceptable form of financial guarantee.
Obligations to governmental entities other than the City (e.g., school district) will be considered
"committed" when the obligation has been satisfied as evidenced in writing from the entity.
In some instances, substitution of improvements may be appropriate. Where substitution is
~?~t~~p!~t~,t~~"9ull:lity of Life" thresholds ~~~~ eontaifled in ,^.ppendix B 9i!9~Nrg.w!9
~!1~~mP~9~.gf9~~m will be used as the basis for determining the acceptabiiity of such
substitution. Substitutions will be initiated only upon written request to the Director of Public
Works.
(08/3119~)
8
Before exceeding cumulative levels of development af eacH transpol'tftti611 f~"Jmy threshold
,iimm~, inelllding the phase thresholds far inerements ene tflrough eleyen of iiieofmnsportatien
PhllSillg PIIlII including ilie pHase iliresholds shown in Table 2, the required improvements of the
threshold must be committed to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. The Director
of Public Works shall have the ability to select from any of the following options prior to
building pennits being issued for a subsequent phase.
I. Improvements must be completed or open to public use, whichever first occurs or,
2. Improvement must be subject to an awarded construction contract by a governmental
agency or,
3. Improvement must be committed by an agreement with the City which shall include,
but not be limited to, all of the following requirements to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works:
a. All discretionary permits must be obtained for construction of the
improvement;
b. Plans for the construction of the improvement must have all necessary
governmental approvals;
c. Adequate funds (i.e., letter of credit, cash deposit, or performance bond) must
be available such that the City can construct the improvement if either
construction has not commenced within 30 days of issuance of a notice to
proceed by the Director of Public Works, or construction is not progressing
towards completion in a manner considered reasonable to the Director of
Public Works.
(9~{~g~~) 9
CHAPTER II
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
REOillREMENTS FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
This chapter describes the public facilities required to support the development of the EastLake
Greens (SPA #2) as well as identifying the public facilities required to support the cumulative
development of EastLake an~?therp~()pe~f:sint~f:.E\astern Territories, pursuant to the
TfIlHsportation Phasillg PIIlR fi!~~~m!!!j.~~fRIIJI!.
A. NEEDED FACILITIES
Transoortation
Il~llhwg~\lll!ilill~llIliirI1l11'111,~~!~~!~!!~r!
projects requIred to supportufiimatedeveiopmenio(sPi\lt2, as weH as adjacent areas, are
identified in the Traffic Analysis for EastLake Expansion, dated September 26, 1988, as
preparedfor the City of Chula Vista by Willdan Associatesi~j:!I1j~I!!I'~~~Im!i~iil(i
!;\~~y.ptRj!:\9~. The Traffic Analysis was performed in the context of Environmental Impact
Report preparation and, as a result, identifies measures necessary to mitigate transportation
system impacts associated with EastLake Greens and EastLake Trails.
The transportation projects necessary to accommodate phased build-out of SPA #2, are of two
basic types:
I. Those facilities that provide for circulation within SPA #2 and which primarily
benefit the EastLake development. Circulation system components of this type yet
to be constructed include collector roads and local residential streets. These
improvements will be constructed to the ultimate City standards in accordance with
Subdivision Map Act exactions keyed, via tentative tract map conditions, to the
recordation of specific subdivision maps. (See Circulation Plan Exhibit A).
2. Those facilities that are necessary for SPA #2 development but which provide area-
wide circulation benefits to other eastef!1ar.e<!~f:velopmentsas\Vell~a~i~el1tifit:<lin
the TfIlHsportatian Phllsing PlllR If_mm1ii!!g.~p.;~!ftIJ:!fqi~.
Circulation system components of this type which are yet to be constructed consist
of major and prime arterials as ffi6re speeifieally described in tHe Cireulat1all
Element Class ill i\ppellclix l. settillg forth tile eesigll stllRdftfds IlRd ettpaeities af
s!leH faeilities r~j~iIi.;.;H;!!nl~R*!~f!~~~$~j:!iI?!!~1r1~$~;.'~Y~RM~1.
Regarding streets and highways of area-wide benefit, the City Council has recognized the
necessity for a Development Impact Fee (DIF) to provide a funding source for road projects of
;~i~~li~;;ilil~iii~~i~~iii;~~~'!~liIIlBII_1~fl
(9~{~l!!l~)
10
'5
~
:J
~
0<
.
.
r ~
r ~ ci
!! ~
u""
~ ....
-+
~
o
:-t c:
ii ;,
10'10 III
~ '...
~
o
~
.,
ii ~
:,,110
.. ..
,
<
-
c
.,
if
.. :1
~ jjh
d !-o:
~ .
~ : w ~
d I
"
h"
~;
r _
..!I: ..
o ~.
=- IE ~I
i ~
i ~ ,[
>4; ";,
.:! ~ I
.
j
. .
:ii
ei-I.L
a:~ ~
~~ ~"
-. 'I'
i I":
i; '[,>-
!~ . I'!
~j 1/,,_,__
!~ --~..
"b i
,i ii:1
;. '!Io!-
1: :~:o\
'~\*I'\!
::; ~ ~ ;!
" 'Yo
! I ~{
~ - -
;
a
~
o
~
)~
i -
!
.
E
.
,
-
!
.
,
i
!
j
,
;:
~~
~~
.2:
!~
.,
iij
i:
w
[I)
!
II
1 I{
r
, Ar
~~ <C
~
(
;. 0
.
.,.....~.~
" ,..;?
IJ..
'" ~
\'
\,
\,
-__.1.
./.---.---
/
('
I
-----~--i
. /' ,
//' 1-
/y /
/y
//
/~?
--~ ./
,/
~-
/
, .
,,/, /
/ >---
//
//
E-, ~!
~ ;~
'-I1!'!~a
\j'S ]t
~.
-gj ..
.:II
<(
-
;C
..c:
x
W
i
I
LLI\I1 j;~
~zf~
S~Ji
~Q:: <(
U1(D
~
~
!:!!g~9!:1~m~~~ii)Mi!!m~m!9m~~i EastLake'sSPA #1 and SPA #2 have been included
wlifilniiieareao{benefidoriiieexls!ing miiJID~~!:!Rij DIF. As such, development within the
SPA's will be responsible for \V.~pQ!lt!Pfi DIFs (ellffelltly $2,101 per sitlgle family detaefled
dwelliRg !lRit) to be u3ed te'.:iiffiltheoo3t of eon3truetiRg a total of some $71. 8 lflillion iR
regional trllll3portation faeilities mYml~.
The obligation toward DIF program participation can be met in two ways, either by payment of
the fees !ij~!f(~ to the City of Chula Vista at the time building permits are pttHed !~~}!11 or
through tile construction of qualified DIF related projects. The former allows construction of
required facilities by the City of Chula Vista when sufficient monies have been collected or on
a pay-as-you go basis, while the latter allows the developer to construct the facility when needed
in exchange for a credit toward DIF obligations. Should a developer's cost to construct a DIF
project exceed the developer's fee obligation, reimbursement will be made as future fees are
collected by the City. The exact basis for reimbursement may be set by the a future separate
agreement, to be entered into between the City and developer specifying how the developer will
be reimbursed by those projects benefitting from the construction of DIF projects but who do
not contribute to their completion. Such an agreement will, among other things, specify the
maximum amount of DIF credit to be granted, consistent with the method of determining DIF
fees and reimbursements due under such calculation, if any.
The DIF program has !Jeen adopted by the eity on l1li interim bllsis. The program is e\:lrrently
being updated to addrcss cHanges in tHe eireulatioR system as Vlellas eflanges ill the tilfliRg Ilfid
degree of future developmellt. It is iRteneed that tHe prolJosed updllted program will be adopted
by the eity iR the nefti" fut\:lre. Speeialattention is beitlg given to tHose streets (pr-ojeets 50, 51
and 52) that are in me Cellnt). of San Diego for .....hieh 110 DIF fees MC being ealleeted-ftem.
developers '.vithiR tHe COllnty.
18!:1luPfimm~;,~~~oonir;mm.~pQ!lt!Pfi~Jfi;m~~I~~~mRUII1~~JfiiElt9
n9il1l~~I~'I.i~ii!iq~~~it~g~iii!it;gi~!m~l.mI~I~~;~mi
\V.).ij~..~...}...........~9~.t!1gr.~n. ~P. r.gjj;$t......................m!:!!g~!i.!:1~.......... j.nt!!.!~. P......~.............. 1.}~gii!!Ii~. jj.!.mil.Yim~
t~~~~liI~~m~~m~RjijM~~PI!.~~ls~~~mi... .... .. ............. ...... .. . .... .... ...... .. .... ..
SPA #2, will be required to participate in two levels of traffic signal improvements. The traffic
signals planned within the boundaries of SPA #2, are considered the sole benefit of SPA #2.
The new traffic generated by the development will also have an impact on the need for citywide
signals and signal upgrades. All development within the SPA #2 areas would also be liable for
payment of the current Traffic Signal Fee in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Water
Both SPA #1 and SPA #2 are located within the boundaries of the Otay Water District (OWD),
which is responsible for providing local water service. OWD receives its water for the San
Diego Water Authority via the second San Diego Aqueduct.
Although described here for information, the manner in which EastLake will ensure the
adequacy of potable water from OWD shall be the subject of separate agreements between
(9.~{M!!I~)
12
;i_i~,pt~;i;lil.~~.1111~1_.lil1li~!i!i!i:I$!~:lIY:fi
This provision of the Public Facilities Financing Plan sets forth the anticipated means by which
water service will be ensured for the EastLake I and Greens projects.
The area is currently served by a ~~~~!j~!I~ 5 million gallon reservoir~ and pump station,
(EastLake Pump Station) eellstrueted in aeear6llRee ....,itH the EastLake I P!lblie Faeilities
Pillllfieillg Plllfi. The backbone waterlines constructed within the service area were oversized to
meet future water requirements and have the capacity to serve the SPA #2 development.
Based on an analysis of existing and proposedco?di~??~:~~~f?ll?~~?~~~pplemental water
system improvements have been recommended jml'!Aj.!tfff~j;l!}ij!#1~~!nR~!;~~:
I. Increase the pumping capacity of the Central Area Pump Station ~if~~!~~l from
~,OOO GPM to 9~,OOO GPM.~ ................ .........
2. Add 2 million gallons of storage capacity at the ID 22-1 Reservoir site located within
SPA #2 boundaries.f
3. Add a 4,000 GPM pump to the existing 980-zone pump station.
4. Install various transmission and distribution mains in accordance with IlA apprayed
~i;i!1iff;mt~~~ Master Plan.
OWD Improvement District 22 (ID 22) has installed a number of improvements to provide water
for SPA #1 and #2 development. These include ajj'.tQI!~I~!lM 3 million gallon reservoir to
serve the 7I~fI' pressure zone and II mlI!9 5 million gallon reservoir~ to serve the 980'
pressure zone. OWD ffl also abeut te complet~ an 8 million gallon reservoir to serve the areas
to the west (Bonita Long Canyon and Rancho del Rey). OWD has reqlle~ted that MUg~~
EastLake ~!t~$ _ to ID 22.N
In addition to the existing ID 22 improvements, improvements required in conjunction with the
recently formed Improvement District 27 (ID 27) will also need to be funded. ID 27 will
initially includ~ the developments of Rancho del Rey, EastLake and Rancho del Sur (~w!Q9W).
An ID 27 Master Plan !!I.n is bciHg prepared by OWD to determine required facillties,cost,
and financing mechanisms. The most significant facility that will need to be provided is a
terminal storage reservoir which will provide w:riIDi'iill five says storage to meet ~ demand$
reEjtlired reserves for tit the participating developments within the ID 27 boundaries. A eefltrOOt
_&hi;ii;iLii~~i~7eiRa ;:n!:~Rr~.~:~~ '!!~!!"~:mlIllli
OViD will Feq!lire Ea3tLake to enter into IlA agreement ',vHieh aeliHeates tile ID 27 faeilities to
be eeHstrlleted, eaehee...eloper's eost re3ponsibilities, llIIe filllHleillg methees to be !ltilized prier
to reearaatiell ef II first flAaI map 'uitilin the SPA #2 arell. This agreement may alse plaee limits
8n the n!llflber 8f building permits that can be isslle8 prier te eertaiH facilities witlliH tile ID 27
(9~i:~!{~~)
13
. LEGEND
EXIST.
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -.-.-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ _ _
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 .........
DOMESTIC WATER PLAN
EXHIBIT B
RlCK~CCMPANY
district bciAg iH place aHd opcratiollal.
+.i~. e........ tn.... oo..............~.W. MY......... i..........!rn.........~.............tW.Jd..........~. i.ju.......P. '!J.P. Y. ~m..........~. .mI~ig... i;.py.mp...........$.Ja.... )i. :.9P,. P....~..~. ep;~i~!c........;.).........~. 9.........$erv....................~...... gjj.X~. }..................
......................................................................'................tt......................................................................................................... ......
i~ittl;l~ilili~TlfI.llitlilif,lri,I~L~lilii)"illl
j?~t!11t1~ey~ml~~!~iS~{~!~gic~I~g$~~~A~prByf~~~~A~i~~~~J:l.ii1!.~i~~!jWs~
.H!)i~r~~M9P~~S~P~~!1~!~ete!!jl!11m~iil~f\).P!Pgt9~~rM!I~~!~rt~~~!~;i.
~S9!!~!f!!9~g~~p!W!'9rl~~~t!mprey~m!mffi~~~H~QR!!j~~!!~~~yi%~p~~~~Fgenf%1
~~f~~~~); . . .. .... . ..... . . ... .. . . ...... . . .. . . ... ... ... . . .. . ... .
Reclaimed Water
Reclaimed water is available for irrigation purposes from the Otay Water District's Rarnlj::\M;
%JJ~p~ij~~t~B~Y9t!pgiffl~BHi~ym~B~~f'J Jalflaeha Wastewatcr Reelalflation PlaRt.Th.ese
facilities are currently capable of producing approximately onel;? million gallons of reclaimed
water per day lit II seeoHd!!fY level. IH 6rder to meet Title 22 reqllirements, the tfelltmeHt plllnt
will need to bc upgraded. f.R e'ialuation ef the treatmcflt plaAt has beeR pcrfurlfled aAd, sllbjeet
to OWD Board approval, tilo plant may be upgraded to 1.3 MGD to meetjf!g tile Title 22
requirements. At present, Otay Water District is providing apP~Q~im~~~'Y small Ilmount %5Q
al.1t~tflt of reclaimed water pcfy~ to SDG&E's Migllel SlIbstation for irrigation purposes.
The proposed reclaimed water distribution system within the SPA #2 area is shown on Exhibit
C,.. ..*9.~....%i!itiml.>>!~t~%9!~~ipIIBr...B!Rf!!~I~i;~ii...P9ffipi:ng;...~~e~g~i.l1tpiijgi...~t9;)....wi'!...~~
q2!)~~9t~~tQjfgnfqrm~2!A~;sjftt~p~~~~~~~lR'!iTIi The system backbone has been
planned to providereciainied waierforlandscape irrigation to the EastLake Greens golf course,
high school; aOO community park!ffi~~~~9~~' These facilities will utilize the existing
production capacity of the ~~I]~ Jllmaclm Wa3tcwater Reelamatiofl PIllnt's 1.3 million
gallons per day P!itS#~8!Y less the amollRt allocated for SDG&E usc. Additional capacity
has been designed into the system to allow expanded reclaimed water irrigation usage should the
Otay Water District facilities be expanded to provide additional quantities of reclaimed water.
A 20-inch reclaimed water supply line was constructed in phases within SPA #1 (i.e., Lane
Avenue) and extends from the terminus located at Telegraph Canyon Road to the Otay Water
District Use Area. This pipeline was constructed to provide water for grading operations and
landscape irrigation demands for the SPA #2 area and other portions of the region.
~atyJ~~~~~~:~~~:f~~;:!~~e~~~~:l~~it:;ei~~::
constructed. These will be included in the local street constru<:tionprojects.
(08/3 IJ9~)
15
LEGEND
EXIST.
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -. - .-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ _ _
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3.........
i
RECLAIMED WATER PLAN
EXHIBIT C.
RIcK D.GINEERIN:; G::MPANY
Sewer/Waste Water
The City of Chula Vista provides sewage collection through City-owned facilities. The sewage
is discharged into the City of San Diego Metropolitan Sewage System (METRO) for treatment
at the Point Lorna regional plant and disposal through the METRO Ocean Outfall.
EastLake SPA #1 and #2 is divided into five separate basins. These basins are (1) Telegraph
Canyon; (2) Proctor Valley; (3) Long Canyon; (4) Salt Creek and (5) Poggi Canyon.
The majority of EastLake SPA#U#2 will sewer to the Telegraph Canyon basin through the
existing City of Chula Vista l5-inch trunk sewer in Telegraph Canyon Road. Additional sub-
regional sewage system facilities will be necessary to adequately serve SPA #1 and SPA #2 at
buildout. In the context of SPA #1 development to date, off-tract trunk sewer connections have
been completed to collection facilities within East "R" Street and Corral Canyon RoadjI~~
I~H~I~~R~!!!l~wII..
These existing facilities are to be utilized to serve the needs of SPA areas within other basins
pending phased implementation of additional sub-regional sewer facilities. Existing trunk sewer
capacity needs to be closely monitored. Monitoring of the existing 15-inch sewer trunk line in
Telegraph Canyon Road will ~~ b~ provided by EastLake through I~~~~ eJleeutton of
It sewage monitoring agreement with the City. Prior to the time that existing capacity limitations
are reached, the following public facilities must be implemented:
1. Install Ilfi off site sewer liRe te be 10eftte8 generally along Praetor Valley Read te
serve a partien of the SPA #1 I!fe!I liS well as at-ller ee'ielepment to the neflhwest.
~Install one or more of the following as necessary to serve a portion of the SPA #2
area as well as other future development:
a. Install a new trunk sewer parallel to portions of the existing Telegraph Canyon
trunk sewer, to provide additional capacity for mmm~ pumping from the
Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. .........................
b. Extend a new trunk sewer southerly along Salt Creek to the Otay River Valley
and then westerly to the City of Chula Vista's existing collection system. This
would gravity sewer to the Salt Creek basin portion of the property but still
require pumping of the Poggi Canyon Basin flow.
e. Construet II water reelamation pllillt at IlA agreed upon loeation. This plllAt
eO!l16 hllfidle all gt'liYity Ra',1\' liS well as interim p!lffij:)iag from fleYiS te the
Peggi Clillyen Basin. THe plllAt '.vau16 be phased to HllIIdle expllIIsion to
aeeolfllflodate adjaeellt upstream develeplfleats which life also tribllwy to the
basitr.
The speeifie laeatian of the reelllmation plllfit IlIId/er eff site trullk sewers will Be tile result of
further studies.
(9~{~1{~~)
17
--
t:,"'S'f
LEGEND
EXIST. .
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 -. - .-
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 - _ __
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 .........
PUMP HOUSE G>
WASTEiWATER
COLLECTION PLAN
EXHIBIT D
RIcK EN;INE:ERll'K; CCMPANY
III tHe ease of sewer faeilities serving sub regionflllleeds, tHe cost of tHe improvements would
be shared .....ith futHre de'ieloplfleRts tHat 'Nollld lIt41ize t-lle same basin.
The planned wastewater collection system for SPA #2 is shown on Exhibit D. Interim pumping
to the Telegraph Canyon Basin is proposed for the portions of the project which ultimately drain
to the Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. These pump stations will be abandoned or relocated
when one or more of the above referenced permanent alternatives is implemented.
Prior to the recordation of the fiRal map, 1111 IlgreelfleRt betwecR the City and EastLake
Developmellt Compan) shall be eJ(eeuted to far!flally i!flple!flcnt 0110 or !flare ar the alterations
deseribed ifl this seetion.
Drainal!e
SPA #2 will be served by a series of on-site drainage facilities that wil1 serve to collect and
convey the storm water runoff. Facilities wil1 be designed to handle peak discharges in
accordance with City standards. These facilities consist of a series of surface conveyances,
desaj1ting basins, transmission pipelines, and detention basins (temporary and permanent).
Storm water runoff will be detained in on-site detention basins and discharged to off-site areas
in the Telegraph Canyon, Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon basins. $lkBaldwhiCompany,oWher
({)8/31/9~)
19
!!I[ft~li_II,lllli~!~~!t!~!~!!!!'!~!f!t,~!~~!!~
(9. <~. !'$(t9........~.j
............... .
20
o
~
i
~~
LEGEND
EXIST.
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 1 _. _._
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 2 _ _ __
SOUTH GREENS PHASE 3 ..........
DETENTION' BASIN @
PROPOSED OUTLET -(
UNIT 26 CONST. _-.-.-....
__.E.~S1'
.
7>
f
/
fi
STORM WATER
DRAINAGE PLAN
.]-/'240/
. ,.
EXHIBIT E.
RICK EN:;INEERW:; cavwANY
As an alternative to the construction and maintenance of large basins, improvement of the
Telegraph Canyon Channel may !!~ be!\p undertaken through the creation of a drainage district
funded by fees collected from all undeveloped properties within the boundaries of the district.
WIlen $~9~ adopted, such fees v.'ilI be ~~ required from EastLake Greens within the district
boundaries.
.~..~.~.~. ~. ~t. !...........I~~r~~~li~IIJ~I~.....pu............ii...........~.{........................ s..... RIJIt.p.....~. P......~........ !.;......'.i9? Q......~.r. ~j~e......... P.....~.....~.;.~.~I..p..
".. .... .jj.. .={t"'.""~,, .""....".",,0<......_ ...."'0<". . n ." . 8"'{. "'h"""~. .... .."",;;. ..... . ... .11.... ...n...
'tV!S~~1'?t..NYHt9!!%r?flt!i~m':'!Ff*9~t8$fyHyPWB'7tNW$P1/,~!!M~!!1!?c~~Q1'Ym
@!iip~lj~~~; . ... ......... .. ... . ... .... . .. ..... . . ... .... .... .... ..... .
School Facilities
SPA #1 and SPA #2 are both located within the Sweetwater Union High School District and
Chula Vista Gity ~~m~~ School District. In December 1986, EastLake Development
Company entered into Agreements with the Sweetwater Union High School District and Chula
Vista Gity wt~*j'j~ School District authorizing the formation of Community Facilities
Districts for the purpose of financing high school, middle school and elementary school capacity
to serve the EastLake Community, including SPA #1 and SPA #2. A Community Facilities
District under the Mello-Roos legislation is currently in place for financing all school facilities
to meet the needs of SPA #1 and SPA #2.
In compliance with the December 1986 Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School
District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has provided
to the Sweetwater Union High School District a site for a senior high school of forty-nine gross
acres. SPA #2 shall not be subject to the payment of school impact fees for secondary school
facilities. (Reference is made to the Agreement between Sweetwater Union High School District
and EastLake Development Company dated December 11, 1986 and "Special Tax Consultant
Report" dated June 1986 for specifics.)
In accordance with the December 1986 Agreement between Chula VistaGity pt~~ School
District and EastLake Development Company, EastLake Development Company has agreed to
sell to the Chula Vista Gity '!1i!~iP~~ School District four school sites of approximately ten
(10) net usable acres each within the entire EastLake development. The purchase price for such
property shall be the lesser of twenty percent (20%) of the appraised value of the site or $23,000
per acre, adjusted annually.
In September 1988, in partial satisfaction of this Agreement, the Chula Vista Gity!w~~~
School District acquired an elementary school site within the SPA #1 area. A second elementary
school site has been proposed i!~y!q~ within SPA #2. In additionto the authorization of a
special tax and issuance of bonds, the Chula Vista E#yE.l~.g School District has
authorized a maximum impact fee of $600 per residential dwelling unit, subject to annual
escalation adjustment (f\qtl!1~!y~i~Q), payable at time of building permit. (Reference is made
to the Agreement between Chula Vista Gity !W~iP~!!~ School District and EastLake
Development Company dated December 9, 1986 and "Special Consultant Report" dated June
1986 for specifics.)
(08/31/95)
22
Parkland Dedication
Planned park and recreation uses within SPA #2 include the dedication of a 15.1 acre public
community park which includes approximately 1.1 acres of slopes. The other recreational
elements, which include three neighborhood parks totaling 1O.:5)? acres, are envisioned to be
privately owned and maintained. Also, an II-acre public neighborhood park is proposed
adjacent to the elementary school and will be maintained by the City of Chula Vista (only 50%
ercdit will be given f1'Jr acreage ullder SDG&E easemellt). In addition to the public community
parks and private neighborhood parks, a Community Trail System (1 aeres) will provide a
connection between all major focal points within SPA #2 and extend north into SPA #1 and east
~~~~~~1~i!~;~,'iJlII~II~1j~!~(III~RI~rlil~Irt1J11I1
SI11\t*1i:m)
..... ..... .
... .............
~ilr1fi~~~j~9p:J);AcijiH~
:erQl~i:i9}((+}}............................. .
t1j.t~ltIl1l~Ifi}
IbJ}}
lt42I
P"'il......
R#IL
P<i5.......
Pi:!blicCrifuiriumIPiirk*?
II!.~.llg~.~.~~~~I
-
...................
J;~$
12;9ti}~!l\1!~
3] 2",;$a~(
~!7i!I.l00iI
t~;q;...:I~Q~I
..".."...................................."0....1;;.....
ii!G.(# ....m(
?~~i~
.........................fl$
II~j7
I!!.!;~
til)o/
iii.......~~.~. ................................................tt#
~!NR!9^~qQMJW;!I:'I;1i\Pri'\ql#1.T~
fl........ ... If.tciI..r.........~..... ir~if. . ..... ...... ..... .............:beed
~__I~~tili_~I*,I~~?!!~y~!M~!Il!~gt~!!!!B!fgIg.~~!~PRt9Er
The Parkland Dedication Ordinance m~) requires approximately ~ tRip acres of improved
parkland for !I'i~iYUi EastLake. Greens Ptwl!!j.~~44!im!l'i~mrq}il~Hi~~1i.
EastLake Greens is proPosing a total of 4G;6~g;~~acresof !i~!~plJbHc and private
improved parkland, however, ~U:!;2 acres is intended to consist of three private neighbor-
:~ie%~~: t~:~~~~~;~~~i~~~a~ ~~~::c~1111Ir~lg~3f~~:~~:~~~
-
(j)~I~H!lSj
23
Hcigliberheecllififk:iliiidiistlHileii"he SDC&E easemellt, whieh will fllrther re6l1ee EastLake's
p!!fk total.
Parkland InlDrovement
THe City's P!!fIdIlllB Improvement Progftlm sets fufth II stllHd!!fd for deterlllinillg tHe filllllleial
obligation of EastLake for parkland ifRJJr-evements. Tile tetal finaneial ebligation baaed !!pOll
the City's P!!fk f.eqllisition IlAd Developllleot Fees Ilfid based lIpon tHe mix of Housing types
prepose6 in the SPA II doeument is $5,322,595. The p!!fk develepment partioo is $1,092,450.
EastLake is proposing to provide the City with fully improved parks as follows: Community
park (~1~j~A~ acres less slope aereage), neighborhood park (H $j$;A~ acres), 3 private
neighborhoOd parks (-1M :~qi*:'fi~ acres at a maximum of 50% credii)iR~ij~.~; for a total
of ~ pi;~ acres of !!1~l~improved parkland that may qualify forcrediiiinder the City
Ordinance: ................
It shall be required that EastLllke provide improvements at or beyond the above specified level
as turn key park facilities or pay park fees in lieu thereof. The determination of park
improvements, obligations and/or credit by the developer shall be based upon approval of
acceptable design and improvement plans for parks by the Director of Parks and Recreation prior
to recordation of the final map.
The Community Park !~~ .....ill be started Wid completed during the initial phase of SPA #2
~~_~grm;I~~l' It II will be the responsibility of the developer to prepare a master
plan tha! IS acceptable to the City Council, to grade the site according to that plan, and to install
improvements. These improvements weIfId includ~ street improvements, turf and an automatic
irrigation system, landscaping, play areas and other amenities required by the PD~. The
community park has been i~ located adjacent to the high school site to provide the opportunity
for joint maintenance byihe City and the Sweetwater Union High School District due to
ii;i.ii~tit park and school facilities. ~~m,~t~lmnlX~!!ni[f~IIi!m~I.
~~/~~I~lird~~:ti:~:~~i~i~;~ c~~:ab~i~:,v.;i~iii~iiiiiipiiii,
=Fhese easements'i!lj!~~are intended to guarantee the City of Chula Vista that private parks will
remain as ~~q1Jl~mMl~p~ epell spaees. Maintenance of the public community park and
public neighborhoOd parhwiribe provided by the City. Maintenance of the golf course and
clubhouse facilities will be the responsibility of the operator and will be independent of the
Homeowner's Association. Maintenance of private parks and open space areas will be provided
by property owners through Homeowner Associations, open space maintenance districts or
similar mechanisms.
(9~{~~{?~)
24
en-(!)
~~
'-a.
8:.C/)
~
a.
o
~
<
.
~
<
d
~
g 1~
~
~
~
i .
~
1= ;
~ ~
j j
0 LI
0 LI
0 LI
~
~ ~
1 .
~ j J
I g
~ !
~-I[1J
,
\ ,
\ :.
\ j
\ I';
--.----..1,1
/^,
/ ,
/
/
,
i
1< /
/' d'/
, 1f'Y
-~?f
/
, ,
/'./'
///
/./
,,"
/~
~-~=--
,
-----
'I:I'~-;---
--I,~
"~
r...,~...
- ":E
~~ !..
';:;;I~!~ -e
~ .ct! r,
\J'- B~ ~
~.
-g}
.:;,
LIJ\I1 ~~
~ZU
SLU !~
__LUZ!:_
r=~<
U1(!)
;:is
~.,
LIJ~ ~iJ
~Zn
q:LIJLIJ ~~
..... 0 E
tii~ ~-
::5~
..."
" ~
/4": //;~ppP'O,:\
/,/ ',,", ~~\)'" \\
// ."~ "X~$;'~ ,\
~~ ' ~"- ~;~~ :4...~~!'if \, '\
/,~':.~?~:~. o~~ y'-?~~~;/~':' ""~~~...'\ ~'\
IlI7<. 0 ~;;~~;\ ~<:~~ /..:Jf~~~:' ~7'~Q,. '\~~~~ ~
j' ~ Iljl: ~~" ~~"'__ ~~).'"' 1> '..,.~V'~.~ '
(I!!? ! ;,k... d~~"') ,:1 ~~~':'~=:~---/~p.~"" ,: ;.'1<.~,_~)~)~ " ~r - \,
I~ I', I )~~" ,~~"..f2,tiI" ,,...,,,,.." ',< I )/','v' . \ ~\
l,iO--J I li'ii ~~'" ',I;' ;. ,'\ ) /':J) ~"f~~'/L_-"~~~_J) \t--' -~~~:' \
\I~Q \\:'1\ IL"I ,r~'o':" < -:~_:'f'i~~\,,' n' V:4Ak ~ L~,J '-'f;r,~Jff.i] \
I~ ,III '7-' ~_, ,~' _ , /' "'I :' /~~ .\)~" -~ <C' IO;"'~
\"1~) Ii/,I"I :i,",',)<~'-"'" )~/~' \" 1// )'>~' hr. 1~lta~ '
1.1 ~ ,'" '11~ ',,) ;;;:; "''::3-"Y '.' ~\.," '/ ";~)' /~o,~ ~,'/ ~ "~"a~ I' '\
. Iii. l" -. _ _' '~~ e. -J I "\ - I rJ '~;?'~1 .,.
'I "I' ;. J"- 1/".==_~-.J '--, ,\~ · J~' r I /- c_ "".."...,~.
\ ~' "I,U .j -'J"IIQ~-' '" "" \~, It. / ---'-'.-~,.'S,~,.
_, \\\\ ~ \ "1 c:lt?, . - ) "",~ ,/ F \ ,/-
I II I '\'\L,~~~./ ._ , '\1 8);::'::, ''t;~B1t' \ \ 1'(1 ' "" '0 C ' ,,< ~,-:l@ ;
. '\."-:-, ,.. . ,\ \ ) _ : l '1 II I ':;. el'M1
, , '\ \....,\(~' ^' >\ _ I _--..J --:.= ~.,' ~ II I r .-/ ~
-----A(: \~ ~.. \-"'v \\ \\.-) II~/.I ~ I, ,\ \ ..~
_~. \ So\ ;.~~.", S'~\ ,'~~ ", ~~&' .' oil' > '\, \, \ \\ \- .,;:,'f21 ' ,
\1 ::::~'" ",- 'Jia~.. J\, \\ \ \'",\ ,---=--"- 0: ~ 0:./ r...! \~ \ 0 \ ',..&.~ '
P: ) -',-,>, %~\ 'v c \ ~ _~,-:--:'// ' r-., :"1" ' , \1\. \ A/ .,,~ '
\Q~' ~'-~"':"--~~'~' ,\ (;"';:;;.)--' C iff-,)--,O~i!/(ftT'~-~~) q\.~ ..,-;.,,~ \
. /', ~__ .\_ ( ,_ ~.. (? (. _! ___ .~".,...v
o Q/ ,,~ .\ =- q, \.-.-.. f~1 "f '"'\') _~_~/ ' /.t.!~ v
r-""'='-~..'\ _ ~ _" --"L-'I .. (- / ( , \ .._7_ ",-------
'y~O ___~l ,) '"'~"'."~ '^, ,C.J ~~" " ! ".."".,~~ " n_n_.__
\-; p.:;~?=-~~~ ~..i:1!...."..u.....!fi~:ol!1.~............~~~~ /
__fr .~~.~:;.:: 1~.~~I!JElS~~ ~:' ~SS&I.s~~..... ("
.-", ~" -':r<; j:,O / ~"
&~\i ~- - ,~.:-.; ~:\O / ~o
~~~ .. ijO:OOI.......,..!!!!.!-.!.!-.!.'80\5n.:;:;.... !~ ..Q i
. \ '_. 0 000 0 ....Qi:JI:j;~.:::;"., ~ j
\ . ' ~' i""(/(i..... '
\ . ~ ''lJoc;;;.......J-
_ _ ~' ~ '~ t::IDrriJ'l
_I?~'::::::' e~ -~ r ~~~
~ '-::::::~~~, ~---. M'li
ft ~< .~
- -L.. ""'" ~_ . _._. __ ~__. fl.,
_____';.;;;:-~='~c,=~~ II
.~ ..==____n_'" .:"~....:."_==.=--~~
c:
Cd
0::
Jll.
.~
J==
..
--~
;----~-
."
~
o
in
'"
~
~
.
~
m
8
'5
"
.
.
!
.
Ii
.
...
"
.
;<
If ~j- :
m~ >- ~
~m - ~
~i jJ :
j
~ 0
~ 0
~ 0
tl-@
~
~
"
c
j
~
~
c
.
~
c
-!
;;
.
a:
"-
~
..
'"
~
c
:;:
i:I
i:I
i:I
C)
.
~
...
:is
:c
><
w
.
.
>
.
.
.
<
i
.
.
2
.
.
<
~
i
~
.
.
I
!
.
J
,
J
!
i
OJ
EJ
Street Lil!htinl! and Landscane Maintenance
Funding for the maintenance of landscaped street medians, landscaped parkways and
supplemental street lighting within public right-of-ways or dedicated maintenance easements will
be i!m borne by the benefitted property owners through tile ferlflatieH ef a Maintenance District
estibilshed under the provisions of the Lighting and Landscape Act of 1972 (Division 15, Part
2, Streets and Highway Code).
Currently, all of SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2 are within the boundaries of EastLake
Maintenance District No.1, approved and adopted by the City of Chula Vista December 17,
1985~ilijlRt\.~!@!~~1,~~~;lg!l!iM9i..it~, The balance of SPA #2 will be Ser\'ed
citheri-iiffiugH the6Jipllllsiell af !mfi!m~'19 EastLak6Maintenance District No. I er througH the
ferffiatieR ef a 3epllfllte Mai.nteHiliieeDi3inet.
A Homeowners Association will ~ b~ formed in EastLake Greens to maintain landscaping
located on ~ny~1 common areasl~i~.~Rji!lB9I~BI!RY~imnYiq~_~.
Mass Transit
The EastLake Planned Community Transportation Plan (1982), based on analysis of proposed
land uses, expected travel demands and other characteristics of the area, concluded that public
transit demands could best be served through extension of the existing public bus system.
Extension of this system should occur as EastLake population growth generates sufficient
demands to justify additions to the Chula Vista transit system line haul.
..-:.,-:.:'----'--'-...::'::'...''.'..'.'.:'..:"":..-:-.-.:.c.:::..-',..':..:..:.--..:.-'-.......-...:._:_.:_''..:..:.:.:...--::,.-.:...'.',.'..',........:....:.:--.-:.:::.....:_...,_....:..::.::::.'.:_.:'.,.._:_.'.'.:'..........:.._:..:.._,_.',..'............,__.._.:...'.:',...........
Librarv
IR A!lg!lst af 19&7, tke City appro'iOO a P1:i6lie LibI'lIf)' Master Plan i6e11tifying the Reed fer s!lb
regionallierary faeilities ta ser;'e tile HeedS of f!lt!lre residellts. Aeeerdillg to the Master PIIlII,
SPA #1 is leeated in the Sweet.,Vater sue!!fea IIRd SPA #2 is iHeIu600 in the sub!!fea labeled
Basteffi Temtaries "~elltk". The City's Iflinilfllllfl SIaH€lIlf-d for library eonskuetion is 500 sllullfe
feet of library spaee per 1,000 pep!llo.tien. Based upan pepulatien prejeetiens in these planniflg
sllbl!fe!ls, Illibrery facility ill the EastLake I!fe!I may Feqllire up to 35,000 square feet. Cast
responsibility, at this point, has not beell aetermiHed.
The City is investi-gatillg tHe implementation ef a Developmellt Ilflpaet Fee fer regiellal servicing
pUBlie buildings such as liBfl!fies. SP f. Itl IlAd #2 will be s!lbjeet to sueh II ftiture DIF sholl18
it be applied by the City.
(9.~{~~!!I~)
27
-
As an obligation of SPA #1, a one-acre library site shall be dedicated to the City of Chula Vista
if the City determines that a branch library site is appropriate within the EastLake Planned
Community area. If needed, the library site would be incorporated within the EastLake Village
Center area with the actual site to be determined by the City in the context of subsequent site
plan approval processes associated with the project area. Alternative locations within future
EastLake SPA's will also be considered.
As a further obligation, the Developer wiH.~!!!If!W provide the City of Chula Vista with
up to 4,000 square feet within the EastLake Village Center for interim storefront library
~!iI~E~pr9JI~il;The~ee;;~;;:;~idbei3~e~:;d!~tHee~tPtetheCit);7!"~;;eried;:;f
. . . . .
Fire Protection
Fire protection services for SPA #1 and #2 will be provided by the City of Chula Vista. The
development of SPA #1 and #2 will require the construction of a 3,500 square foot permanent
fire station to serve the local area.
The previous Public Facilities Financing Plan for SPA #1 established provisions for the payment
of fees for the construction of a fire station to serve EastLake SPA #1 and a portion of SPA #2.
entire \:Indeveleped !!fea east af I 805 to HflllAee tHe eefl9trueaon IlAd e<j:uipping of all r~lIired
facilities. SPA It! llIIe 112 wauld eOfltribllte tHcir sll!!fe if the Impaet Pee is adapted.
The schedule for constructing and equipping the fire station to service the EastLake SPA #1
areas shall be in accordance with the City's Fire Station Master Plan.
-----
-
(9~{~l!!l$j
28
Police Protection
The City of Chula Vista will increase police service levels as the service area continues to grow.
Expansion in the eastern territories has created, however, a need to improve communication
facilities. Two specific identified needs include a communications tower or antenna and an
improved computer-aided dispatching ~~. ee.pabilit)'. Costs for these are estimated at
$24,000 and $530,000, respectively. The Police facilitates will be of overall City benefit and
will require City-wide financing.
~~~q~;
(9~i'$lj'jl$)
29
B. SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
Proiect #
53*
54!!!
55~
EastLake ~~!m Greens Oft Site PhftSe 1
Construct EastLake Parkway as a
4-lane Major between TelegfllfJh
CanyoR .yl;~~~ Road and
SDG&E transmission easement
Construct Read "E" I,lj1,1I1!!1:~.
as a 4-lane Major between EastLake
~~ii~id R~R6 "A" Iql!!
i~i~c~ ~~e"2~li!;~!~!
Read "E" &tH~1I9,~~Y{\ and
Hunte Parkway
56!!! Construct Neighborhood Park #1
(~H~I!!!.19Igjjf)
57!!! Construct EastLake Community Park
# I, Phase 1 I!t~~
58!
Construct Road "D" !!!~g~~it! as a
4-lane Major between EastLake
Parkwa and Read "A" Nfidll
YNN
~t~Mi:iiW
59!!
..................-................................,...........".............
Construct ROR6 "E" !41i!l~I~Ji!~!
as a 2-lane Collector between ROOd
.!'.A-"- !!I~I~~q~~'i and Hunte
Parkway
60~
Realign!construct TelegfllfJh CIlII)'on
~jy~ Road to a full ftalf-sec-
tion Major between Lane Avenue
and Hunte Parkway
f~!m~~gj1!M1lliilwt~tI*qml1l1m
(9~~1{~~)
30
Amount Method of Financinl!
$ 3,020,000
350,000
2,600,000
Subdivision Exaction!
Future Assessment
District
Subdivision Exaction!
Future Assessment
District
Subdivision Exaction
590,000 Development Impact
Fee for Parks
2,440,000 Development Impact
Fee for Parks
540,000
1,566,000
3,175,000
4"..''''6.17. .5"'.000". .
. '"' ....
';';'.,;"'..:':":': :
:::.:::~:.:.;:;::.,::.:.::;:~::.:.:;:::.:::':.;:
Subdivision Exaction!
Future Assessment
District
Subdivision Exaction!
Future Assessment
District
Subdivision Exaction!
wum~_9Pmmr
..............................--....................
Future Assessment
District
Proiect No.
6lm Construct Neighborhood Park {~rnmf
m!;M~Hl1~ii~l~ ..................
62~ Construct EastLake High School,
Phase 1
63mm Construct OWD terminal storage
reservoir (leefttien to be determined)
63a Increase pumping capacity of
EastLake Pump Station from ~~,ooo
to 89,000 GPM.
63b~ Add 2 MG capacity at ID 22-1
reservoir site
64$ Construct water reclamation plant,
pump station and transmission main
connection to OWD reclaimed water
system (leeation to be determined),
or
65* Extend new trunk sewer southerly
along Salt Creek to Otay River
Valley then westerly to existing
Chula Vista System
66!!\ Construct Hunte Parkway to a full
Half section mam Major between
:1~: ,~~i1i~lrlIIBtoad
Creem Phft:je 1 Ou Site 8HbtetftI
EttstLake CreeDS Off Site Phase 1
~~Im GREENS PII.\SE 1 TOTAL
Amount Method of FinanciDl!
1,130,000 Development Impact
Fee for Parks
12,209,000 Community Facilities
District # 1
21,600,000 General. Obligation
=flRt~~mmt
Nt A V General Obligation
Bonds
Nt A V Subdivision Exaction!
Assessment District
3,000,000 Subdivision Exaction!
Future Assessment
District
7,650,720 Subdivision Exaction!
Fllhlrc Assessmeet
Distriet $!!iY!!r)?U;1
1,000,000 Soodivisien Eilaetien
II"'"~II
$69,879,729
$
o
$69,879,729
59.. '.'.2.7....0......'.172....0..
. .. .. ".
.,.,.,...J{,."...,..$"....,.",.,.,
if'.'.tlillr....'.,., ............., ... .... .
111~1illiil!.riilll'mti!.g~@~~~~,!1gi;~!.IWJjWf?!~.}1.
(9~{~~!!I~)
3t
~-
"~", r--..-.-., ~-::::::--=::.........
l. " -,"-. . I /;;__ .....,..........
"', 'J L ----;:=--.:~_.~ - -- ---::-- ,!......'':'-,
"',~ .,..r;;--' , "\...- . ~~
_">>,,,- /;--===--::-::"~__""</:'-- I \' t ~':::::-...
'i;,:::::::-'-r--_ --~'_./',--1J [---- ':: '\ I: '~"'~#~
\' ... ..., ' , ,
\ '-"~ "\ \ r---........} ',r..... " \\ ~'
. /'\,\ J. I y//....~, ,':' \ L_ )
.,\ / //=-~ il/l \.- \ \~- -'-"-"--l~'--T"---\-"-" ;/---~ ):..
. \ } // ,-----")--/\) r; r_-"", ...1, \ ___....J -' '1- - \ /( 'I
. ,.. \ I r t // ""'v I , , __- ___ -, _ _- ) ,t \
\I\"~.)./ I' '\ 'c?/\'::d ,;, /\ \ ~ " --~- II J ~ '-_1/""\ \\ II /-
\ '/C' j-' \ \ "", 1 '\ ~- \\ I 'f
", ",_v........../ /-......:..:: J .....' ,:;::-____...._;;,..-, ; \' \ ~ '
\\ ,----- , , 'v \ "- '> ".,.- 1 'jL' '.. I
~ I '/ >V"t..,.. ,'-- --=-"~"'~"'\'" ~_.-1--::: (~~:-.... \ \\ ~\\ II ~
\'( (,'-yf',~(,-" \.~r--~-~~- -''::\,\,:yi'~t\ ',; "-/-~:,\ ':\ ~--J/ '
\ ...... ,/-;..1 , 1/" \~. \) \ \ \ ;' II -
, ; "(, ""'T ..=f-'- \ " ',I. ~ ,~-- -~</ // .r~
\ ;' '-.-'-, I )), , II ___ - ~ ''>::--' /
\"l,L-'-"-"~~~=--..i---~"T i ___)V("" _,>~\'v~
."/'/ II .~/ I ( / , ,/ /^''-.
.::< I:J ( . ~/ ~--L
1 1 U , /,/ /r-_~
/: . )~---- _ /.,." 1 ( i/ ~--
/7 .11 I , I _ __'" --
:;:?' -57~ - ,,/7 ; J ",j/'':::'==--~~~
,/? 1"1/ !,-.J If II
~.::::/ Ii :. --..J r-J,\ III
" Ii ~'- --"-do \ /
'/ ~, "-'r=--l/<, \\ !(
\il' I l"~:-- ii
53 I ~~~~ , ~ '--~~0 \\ "~~I( ~=
..-.-1-..-1 ('~ I I II '/ /\ \\ ~ /-
1.1. I,. i "~" \'-(.\~<// '\- ..d.~\
I I' "'>-" __~>/,/ .-d ~
I il ~'~/ ,,--~~7 >>~\; \
I, \ \ \ .1 "" /Z'-=r- ~~,/ '\ \
!\\ \\ ~-;:-~c:::--- \\ \
1\\ \\ ~-v""'- \\ \
..-'~-::--;:/ \\
"
,
~____ h ~,,; ".>
~~-- l:.-4."j "-
_') _;:::::..- ---...I
'';?'
"'-""
i
I
!
i
\
\
(!JCi1ti
& AsoociaIes
a.nC/iIID.o,.......ei5
1/13/88~
EAST LAKE NORTH GREENS
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS
MAP 1
WI LLDAN I SIMPSON
1-'::
'~ r"-"-'-I -=----
l__ ~; ~- ~~
_~>'\"Q~--=-",[~~-=-~;Y="-1.r=--=c-~:\~\. ~ :\:. .~"-,~_~,
,-_.. . t---,........-\..': \\ i"" y/
\\----- r-.......... ...., _ I! \ \ '"
\' '-,~"\ \ -___. };'/""-_ " 'i II II '-.
..\ /'....\_\ \ Y/l/'\ ~-,\ i/ _-'-.\,_.__~~ )
\ \ " /y~~, ~/ 'L \.'.'c-. - .._..-_..,t-~'-'-1' \\ << ~ 1:-
\. I i ,--")-/',', I., ,..-:"-~..-1' \ ___....JL_L _ _.. ). (( '\
\\~~-j (( \ i:"JV ,{/~i Y \ \ ::"t, --1[-63j.;.'-'~''''=-/-\:\ \\ i,1 ~..
\\ -",':.._1-:/",/ //'--'~'} l " , " _.':.......~-1r a.. \\ \\ y. I
\ i. /.,/ /;{~l I<l>';::==--:-'i~'~~;\'""=,j.~-r-~. \ \\y~" 11
\c,--, .r,_, //"_'./ "')"\.J~\O--:. "~\\\ C'\Y.t\\ -\ ,"~\ VI ~0-_/!/ ,.r'
\ I /,I. .' \ \....)\./. ", " \ 'I' ......._~
.. ..... /-:;../ '\ /: I \;.- v \\ . I; II
,C, ""'T~1" \ \\ ~ ~ II" /
.. ::.' '....-l-... I I L' \~ ~ __ -..... J
\.,,-;~"-'-"~~--"1 )-;;;/" 63' K II
../~' . ~\\1 /~ '-.. L
-':2;_ !;} 1j-,/'~ I /~v ~;o...-=--::--.
." ---, }.~ //'1:b ~ __it --::::::-,=
/2--:::::::/:::;:/621~\ f:~\\\ v 91 t! -----))
.~ "f""C',i" i'h~ '\ \\ (! *
':" !I II I \ Y; II /
63 \ L..~~~~ L .::~~\ <"~~~,--~65 ___
----~. .!.Ir'-~.i< \ \ II / /J{l'\\ )~.o:---
r ! i! ~ "~" \'}~// f, jv \
! \,.':. \\.! ~'X">;~t:df"~"'yY,\ \
! '. \ '\ ' ~"<!:'~ ~y '\0 \
I 1\ \\ I - -;~ \\.
''L 1'\ \\ ~~ 1\ \
~. ,'J/ . .
-.-..-..--" -::: ../ 'I \ \
,
....--....-- ", '0J;-
..--~__ . _~ v /
_____...-- 0.............:-...)
,.., ----
1;?"~
,,~
(!JCinti
!\~
s.n~CA'U8)23i.1h
r=r--1
4/4/811 1.0=. I
EAST LAKE NORTH GREENS
ON-SITE IMPROVEMENTS (CON'T)
MAP 2
WILLDANI SIMPSON
EastLake ~9!i~~ Greens OR Site ~i~~
Phase 2
Proiect No.
67 Coftstreet R-eaa "A" as II 2 lane
Celleetor bet\veeft Road "E" IlIId
NeigHb6rfloee P!!fk #4
68 Construct Neighberflaed P!!fk 113
67mIllfl11Iflllltll~lri~~~
r'lril'IIII'i~~II~OOt
QsaII'1Blg~m9il~i*{fB!!}i
Q9:fB9~~~i~~mle~gg~~*
CreeDS Phase 2 OR Site Subtotal
EastLake CreeDS Off Site
Phase 2
$~~ GREENS - PHASE ;! ~. TOTAL
Jii.......tNt\ID.....ATES.COMPLIttED..itA. C. ...tLti'Y.......
..........-....................--......................-...........".....--.........."......
........ .... . ...-- . .. ......-.-- .... ...........-.... .. ......--.-y......
(9.~{~~!!I~)
34
Amount Method of Financing
$3,030,000 SuMiyision Exactien
623,700 De'ielopment Impact
Fee fer P!!fk5
~f;g~;~~ 1IIIII1\1m
~!&i~ f!i!t~~~
~;~igi~ fB9mm9.~r~YR~~q~~
~~~~9t~~ ..
IS 3,653,700
s
o
$ 3,653,700
619;tliO(J
.;<.:.~.,.:.;.":-,.:-,-,-:~.:.:,,._.,,'
fn
c:U)
CI)"t)
CI).~
~o
C>,t
~~
....... CI)
::JU)
oC'CS
en'&.
-
.'\
9l~-~
UJ~ ;~
~zu
:Sift ~6
~~~:
In<.!)
;:;s
~.I
C"?
Q..
ctS
~
/I
r ..., ~
- "
~....J~
'-1 ",' ~
.L.J :::-
tl~.'
\J-
EastLake ~~~ Greens OR Site ~.....~~~...~
Phll!ie 3
Proiect #
~~p.IR~~m~i~gl~I.I~!fi~
RM!9l\'m?)
69 COlIstruet Telegfllph CIlII)'on Read to
a filII 4 lllfie Mlljer stattlS between
Lane f. venue IlIId Il1inte PMkYiay
70 Construet Hunte PM\cY,ay as a fHII
Half seetiell Majer betYieen Road "13"
and Of!H1ge f.venue
filllfl_tl;I~~j~~~
ilq'.11ITdllrillllli~\i~
....
LQa
71
Construct Roae "A " ~!1Y!fJii\~~t
1a~;lmy.g as a 2-lane Collector be-
tween Hunte Parkway and Neighbor
hood Park 1t1 ~U~rnf!qlln~~iWJ~
~li!!$~~~H~li!t~\!I~!E.#j.
rolmJ:$
72
Construet EastLakc Parkway liS a 1
lllAe Mlljer betweeII the SDC&E
easemellt IlAd the SPA n. beHndary
73
Construet NeigHborHood PMk 1t1
(9~{~gg~j
36
Amount Method of Financinl!
~Jj~~~f. mrll\~
$ 1,400,000 Develepmellt Impact
Fee fer Streets! Assess
mellt Dislflet
2,265,000 Soodivisioll Exaetian
~~i~i~ *~tm!),!m.iimf
~~~m\m,t1:?!~fi1~~
~j~i~ *ii!~~~lm~
~~~m~t~~fi1~~.
3,030,000
..................-... ,
.... '_" _n,' _.
... ....
......-.. ,.
~iQl~i~
.................-.--...........
~~=~~>>~~~~~nl
860,000
Subdivision EJtIletion
627,000
Developlflent Impaet
Fee fer Parks
EastLake ~9. Greens On Site !f:~.~;~~g~\!If~
Proiect #
g,i:'II"rtJIBiil,lm&11
7 4 Con~truet Elemellta:l)" Seftoel #2
rl;}J;(
~
Ii~,I.I..
~
!f4.......'811~rtlltEmg~l\'}i.\lIgf
..~1t..............tl..................................
$$8
1l$a
rlll.,.ili11IlaiW
.1.II1\1.II:flr.NN...............
[.~
~
~
Creens Ph~e 3 On Site Subtotal
S..O...:mH;.:::.:::.:.O.....RE......:m..s:.,..:.:.:.:.:PB!A........:.......S.:.E...,.e:......m;....';r...AIJ::..:.:...:..
. .".. .. ... . .. ....... .. .... ........" ...
.:'.....::.'::..':.f'..,:::..,::...::~::::..::'..:.......::...':.:.:'..:.....,::::....::...::::!::::~:...:;::...::....:...:...:..::.,.:'..:...:::::..:):~::~:.:.:::::.:::.::i:;.:/:::;.:.:::.:.:::.
~~Mim~\m!!9m~&~~~t9m1
(9~{~Mf\~)
37
Amount Method of Financinl!
~f,;. III.MI~mt
4,975,000 Cemmunity Faeilities
District It I
~?!it;Am .llllIr
~i~~;. m~ml.t1!!~tm
~g9;. ~!!I!/;Y!~U~~g
~.;. ~n.lggi;lt~m~~
~~:~!~ 111~1111~
$13,157,000
~1~I!!U!1
en LIJ '" .~ ~ ~
c:fn ~Zn
(1)1:) Q.
(I).~ ('(S
....0 ~LIJ Uo ~
C>Q: ~LIJ ~B
~~}
.eN
.... (1) U1{!)
~fn
oca ~
en'&.
..~.,
~
,~
I'-
.c
~
'"
~ C'O
'b
M
I'-
IoeM)\Jed
rr-
'"
~O>
"..--,~~~
- !i;,ao
~~ :t~
~~a:
"';::1 gJ'
\ii
c;G~-8S
~JI.mlm~:..,1
1I~~~r
!I~j;'.I~mr.~;;~!llj.~
~~
1I.~.I.:.t.~.r.l.i.~.~
. .-.....---. ------.....
~-
s...o..1J1FH...... .........(j.a.........JjJ....NJ....s..... .!PHA.....'...S...JjJ...3..m....m....!AE........
. __ ..... d...... .' .. ..
. ". .. ,.,. ....... -.... .. .-.. , ,. . ..
__' _'" ","," - C'" ,n,_,_," ',' _' ,.-,....., ,', .....
'- :::::..:.,:..:.:,..:.-.'.,.'..... '.::::....::;:..-:...,.-.",..,.::.:.::::'::.,,-:".;':::..:,:.".
.. ... . ....... . C" .
....-.............-.-..-.-....._'.-,....."....................,....-.-............-.-....................,.........-.........................
.....-----_......"..........-.-_..................---_.....,~.........--.-_.......,........,
......................-.............
(9~I~M~~1
39
.!lm 1I.~~I~ilr._
~~~I.
~~i.~.
111r~:~
~~~mM,\II!mll~~.'...
~lIil .1111111'
$2,416,000
~i~~~i~!m
tn
efn
(1)0
(I).~
"'-0
OC:
.s;::M
... (1)
~fn
OCU
en'&.
-.
-~~~-;...-~
...~
9(;~-8S
w\ft ;i
~Z.~~
q:W UQ
~W~6
~o:: ~~
In(!)
~
"~'I
L{)
Q.
~
~
II
'"
~O>
.... .... ~ ~ <3
r , 11 - M
_ t::!~;D
L~1~~
'-I:.JJ' "IXCI::
.... =-
t'i~.
\J.,
EastLake Greens Off-Sit~ Phase 3
Proiect #
77 Censtruct/e!ltelld Medical Center
Dri'te as II 4 llllle Calleeler frem
Telegraph CIlA)"ell Raad to Of!lflge
Ave-,
78 Construct/extend East OfllHge A-ie
nue as B. 2 llllle trevel',vl!)' ffOlfl I 805
to Mooieal Center Drive
79 Wieell Horthbaune an ramps af
I 80S/Telegraph CanyolI Read inter
ehange
Wit Install traffic signal improvements on
...... ~t;[~;Pii~[~tI !~~~'~805
t()PaseoddRey ..........
8+i~ Re-time traffic signal improvements
along Telegraph Canyon Road
83:Z~. Construct/extend EastLake Parkway
...... as a 4-lane Major between the SPA
#2 boundary and f.j!~~ Orange A ve-
nue
~$Q Install eastbound dual left turn lanes
at 1-805/Telegraph Canyon Road
...
m~f3. ({J1~)
.....................
41
Amount Method of Financinl!
4,861,000 SlIbdivisioH Exaction BY
etIteffl
1,655,000 DC'ielopment Impaet
Pee fer Streets
150,000 De'ielopmellt Impaet
Pee for Streets
110,000 De'ielepmellt Impaet
Pee fer Streets !I{.~j
P9mq!l~gjlTraffic
SlgiiaiFuiid
25,000 B!~Y;~!l'ftTraffic Signal
Fund
N! A V SulJdivisian EXB.et1oH
_pp.!I!~m!t~!~t
~~~_tl.~
$ 100,000 De'ielepmellt Impact
Fee fer Streets m~8
lI.q!l~1'
~~_IIIB.,~.llf~
+6!Ilt Construct reclaimed water distribu-
tion main from Jtlmaefttl Basin ReIIse
IM.:ll! Area to existing main in
LMe Avenue
82 Construct parallel trunk sewer in
Telegraph Canyon Road from Hunte
Parkway to a yet to be defined point
downstream
Greens - Phase 3 Off-Sit~ Subtotal
GREENS - PHASE 3 TOTAL
m._tCAm~C!)MPtEm}!DFAt)llijjty
......-...,....-..'..,.,...........................,..........__.....,............-.-..................................-...........:.....:.,.;.,.;.;.:.:.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.;.:.:.,.:
(9~{~l!!l~j
42
750,000 Dedication by Develop-
er
3,221,000 Subdivision Exactionl
i\ssessment Distri6t
$~W~~m
$19,875,009
~I!I;~
$24,932,009
? ,...~...~4;Q99.
.... "'-',-,-,-,-,-,-,'-',-,"-","
>
o
CO
00
~ UJI ^ .{;;~
5 ~Z ~~
(j q"UJ ~~
~ ~UJ ~5
~ I:ii~ ~~
~~<.!)
o ~~_I
c::
o
,-
....
<<I
()
o
....J
~ f
~~;
0..,
....
()
Q)
.-
o
0.... e
:;s
~ EJ;
C. EASTLAKE GREENS ON SITE PROJECT PHASING
Alth()lIgh this pHasiflg is not mlllldated by the Transportation PHllsing Plan assumptians (Table
;i~~~~~lii11i~,iiillliiiiii~i.I'i~rililiji
;nq1!!~_p!'i~~~~1!9~~pgl~pw! A brief description of each phase is presented
below:
Phase One Nhrlti(j.~ns
PRase Ofle fB~.~~[~~N'g[~ includes agolf course, .-l-,6#!;I1l?: dwelling units, 19.6 acres
of commercial development, a high school ~!!fj!!qmm\l!i~typ!\1tg, and 27 aeres of eommtlllity Ilfid
~Wqpn}@t~ Reigfiborhood parks.
Phase Two
Phase TVlo iRelmjes 1,034 d.....elliflg IIRits, an elemefltary school, and a 3.6 acre
lIeighborhood p!!fk.
Phase ThFee
PHase Three iRellldes 930 6Y.'elliRg lIRits, Ilnd 27.8 aeres of eOlfllfler-eial developmeRt.
$()vtIJQ~JI$
~Iiii~i~
~A~~ii%!~fj~~~pfg*fl!'@!y.4w~"ipi9!!!~i'~~!t~~i~~99#tqtm.~~!~!I!!\:I$9A9Pc!
!m.............~..I.~...~. g..~. ~..................t. P....9....!J.J.!9. A~.~gn..pO................!1I!......P..9d.............P........\frk...............'........!m.............P'......... ~.......................s......~................9ti....:P. P. P.r. i....#1.... t\...........!!I.... ..e.)l1. !I. ...........................~......h........90........)..i
................. . ...... ... ... ............ ..... ..... ... .... ................ . ...... ........ ........
1;\~~~9...~
~.~:g~Q!!!.\!9~~~pprq~im~I!*h4~ij/w~19g~;~!!miqy~mr9P~IDi~!i99~tg~l!i90q
~~;~!~P!1~P1\lq9P(gr~pnl~pl~!mg~g9~!9!!Plm.~lw~PHmp~!I!ooi
p11.aSe):1
.b. ... .3'1' ... .3.8. . .1.'. .. . ... ..and... ... .1.' .f' .
P . .. ..d... ..........re.l . .4.0..1 .ts ... etith.. .....re...partt.... .
J\selncu esappro~ima Y welngunl ..comp. .011.0.. .e...p.nva. ... .
. ...... _._ .n .. n. . ....... ........ . ..
. .,. ... ,. ,." ."" ,.., ... , .. ,. , ,.., . ,. . . , ,. .. .... .. , " ',' .. . . ..
:)\:::,.:.::::. :/\: /\: :." :":'" ::,:,,::-' :,'\.,:.. ,,:':';,.'-,:::, ,..',,'::.,: ,,::.:.::' :t:"".:::,:.:::: :}.:: .:",",,'.., ::::::: ,.... .;?:. .::.:: ,': :.:::H:.: '::". :,:\::::",::,):,: ::,;.:':;.:,:'-::':,;:,:i-?:.::,:::.'::\:,::.:" :':\\':':'):''':':- :':::'::}'__":::"':/";/
f'ut1,l11\ Ph~
-
(08/;!1l9~)
44
---
(9~{~l!!l~j
45
en 0) Ii CD
100
C C o a:> a:~ "': ~
<oN EJ '"
, ~d: ~ ~
(1) en Oa: a: LL "
c: o ._ w
(1) -0 ..00 ~ CD ~
ctS C'JN ~l()~ N Q)~
"- . . ' , , '-I~'~
.s:::. a:Oa: a: .&-,I <:: ~ ..
CD a: a: <n en a: \J.~~
a... U5U5 t-:-N<D cry ~ .- -'
C\lC")---- N ~,
N~ .!:~ ~,
.s:::. ,..... . , C\J d.: d: d: d: , c,
...... a: a: C') a: a.. a: .:n
...... U Q) en Q)cn Q)~ Q)en
~ (1) en Qj en~ en '-' .....11>
0 ~ '-' :J~
'--' ~ ~(;j ~(;j f'..
0 .!: co _co
Cf) D. .!:D. .!:D. :JD.
"- a.. a.. a.. a.
a... u.
ctS
.......... I 0
........... ~
::::::::.......
.........
....-...
.......... ....
..........
......... ...
.....
....
LIJ \11 ~~
~Zi~
SIfj ~5
~~~~
~(!)
~
""1
D. SUMMARY OF COSTS TO BUILOOUT Ef.8TU.KE CREENS
l~mlf~~;;;;j;;l!!!;!;;!;j.!.!;;j;!ii;!mj;:.!!jMM;;!;!!;!!H:;!i!~g~~~\lj.
$1itl! Greens - Phase 2
$60,870,720 gj~~g;g
3,653, 7OO~9j~9~j.
~!illi Greens - Phase 1
$ootb Greens - Phase 3
24,032,000 @;!Ji$qjB
..........-...............
~PMm~t~!;~t~~~jIt
u .....w..,.
-.,.,.,.,.:.,.,.:.:.:.:-,
.-.-..............-.-.,.
..................
,::,':':;:':'::,::,::,:,:;:":":':
':::':::::':':':::'::::':::::":':':
..................
... ........
.;.,.,.:.".:.:.,.;.
., ':':"::",',',":,r'2iii("htiti
~tttrrt;;~~~
TOTAL
$88,556,420
.......-...............,.,....
....--.... -.--_......
.. .
... -......
I~I~~!III
(9~{~1{jI~)
47
CHAPTER III
PUBLIC FACILITY PHASING REOUIREMENTS
FOR DEVELOPMENT
A. IMPROVEMENT PHASlNC STATUS EASTLAKEGREENS ~[t~;Bi!~;!!~.J:I~-
ON SITE
The EastLake Greens on-site improvements by phase are summarized in Table I below:
Table No.1
IMPROVEMENT PHASING STATUS
Phase
Proposed Development
SPA #1
~~I~g~~~i~~i~mt
il'!IIII~t
Proiect No.
Page Number
N9mi~r~iI
RP (q 1m
~Q~qq
$!iID.~r~~
1
1,656 DUs
19.6 I.e. Comm.
lIS, 27 Ae. Pllrk
~\!II!i~iIi~~;~_!;
g......roo.................~.. ? t~.}~.............~
.. ............... ...
53 ta 66
9ti~j9~
~
i!4i!35
2
1,034 DUs, Elem.
Sehool, 3.6 I.e. NeigH.
i";I,II:~~
Ii~fi1. P........~. t!im . .
.......................-......
67,68
.....-----......--......."'."."
~qi1qf9*?
:H-
36;;38
3
930 DUs, 27.8 Ac.
Comm. fI1a$1J.nJ~;
gqmp!$m~~~ItE...
l~PJ1
69 te 74
_.............--..-..............
Ig!;J.i%qpit~
33
$!:M4Q
F..... unite. am... ase....
......---..-,.-....-.-.. ........-...
.......... ............
N9"~
(9~{M{~~)
48
R. RECIONAL TRANSPORT.'. nON F.\cIUTY PH.\SINC
The Majar sulJjeet eOYere6 by Table 2 is tile off site street facilities impacted by EastLak-e
Greells IlIId the eumula!iye amollnt af residelltial, eommereiallllle indllstrial, develapmellt not
to be exceeded befsre the impacted street Sf freeway facility is impf6'ied.
It sHould be noted that tHe develepment limits which Have been set fer the regiollal faeilities
eover II de'ielepmellt Mea whiCH iHeludes all of tile de'ielepmellts east af I 805 with the
exeeptian af the Otay R-RAeh. ,'.lsa, the develepmellt thresholds set for regional imflf6'ie
lflellts elltv/eigh IIflY individual project limit. THIIS, fur exalflple, if elllfllllati'/e regional
developmellt eietates that SR 125 lJetweeII Telegraph Canyon Road IlAd &R 54 HeedS to be
eenstruete6 as a f-ellr lllAe freeway, tHeII SR 125 must be impr-eYed prier to further eevelep
ffient oeellrnllg withiH EastLake GreeHS.
It is illtended for the East Chllla 'lisle. Tran~pertation PHasing Plan (TrP), (see ,\ppendiJl ,\)
te be revised !!Hd IIpdatcd 6n IIfl !!Hnual basis. THlIs, caeh ehange in the TPP will ffiltomati
eally beceme IIfIplieable to EastLake Greens beeallse tile TPP is being adopted as an IIfIpendix
t6 tile EastLake Greens Pllblie Faeilities FinaneiHg PIllA. ...S aeeitioHalland develepment
eata and faeility e6st iHformatian beeomes kflown, the TPP BouHdMies ane fee amoullts will
be adjusted to refleet eurrent eanditiolls. Limits, faeility eo~ts, and adjllsted fees ill tHe most
reeently amended TPP and Deyeloplflent Impaet Fee PmgFalfl will tftke preeedenoo over the
iHformation eOHtaifled in Table 2.
N...................... ... ......... .............N..lititr..............()NA...I.... Ff....................... .
........... . . '.. " . , .... . .. --..... -, -, - , . . . ... ... , .
"'."'."""J:!H'ASING'.'.PROG .., . .'f"F'.REGI... ., '.., ,.,.,.,., .A..€IIII~...
:.1>.;;;,:,:;:,:,:,:,:,:,:: .c.- . ."", ." :.-.", ::::. '.:. _ . .:. _ . _' . "':, . , , .::,: :u "':" : .',., - .:.: -. :., . ;::;:::. ./ - ",:.". -. :,. :' .:. .: .... .
,::::::':':::';,;:::,:,,;'::;.......,....-.......-.-...-...-.-...-...-.......-....,.......,...,.,.,.,..'.'....-',............-...............................-...-.....-,-...-,-......-,.,-...-.........'.-..........'............-'-.,.-'-.-.........,.-...............-......'.............-...-...-.-.....-,-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
~~9n!\JJ9.rm'!1!\fm!i_Ugjt49i!~f!~i~~g!i&!ty1.Q9tfi!!e!:i"!i~!'i~wlip9~j~mP.mm~
--
G.i~,g~~'IB~gBI~~I!~~
(9~{~l!!l$)
49
rriiJi~Nd;~
g.~!...i~.i1I~
Im~;ili!!;!!!!II!;~I!!!;!l!!~~~,~Ii!~!j!;!!!!H!;;!ji:;j!;ili;!;!!!~.;.mi~.!;!!!!;;!!;;!;;:!!~illirt~
~9n1'i!!j!1!!1mB;!m;,nIIi~f,@;j!!;;;;.....'.'...'.........'.........P.l..{l2' 2 ct&ttt ac.)....................!iB5\;!(.ac..
!;;;i;:;;;;ijin;!;II~III!ri~jjj~;;;;',i:;;;;
4;j;;~~~,.;~~~
..
-.-,......-.'.......'.'.....'.-...'...-...'.
............'.......................-.......
::::::;:::::::;:;:::;:;:::::::::::::::;~:~
,:::,:,::;;:;:;:::::,:;:,::::::;:;:.:.:;:.;.
;~r5z1!tAi.ia;\ii8aMf
:::::::::::~r~::::::.::(::\':.:.::~::::.::::::);t~Rt:f:::::~::.:::~b:::::::::::::
G'filf€.otifSet
......................----_.......
,................................
i!.~~~i~;Er~l~~~i~
;jt!j~j~
......................
......................
:::::.:::::::::::::::::::~::::::::::.:.:.:;
...,.
w....
(9~{~~{1I~)
50
Table 2
PUASINC PROCRAM FOR
RECIONf.L TRr\~lSPORTATION FACILITIES
(i{~{~HI!~)
51
MAP 7
RECIONAL TRf.NSPORTATION Ff.CllJTIES
(9~{~t;tg~)
52
CHAPTER IV
PUBLIC FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING
A. OVERVIEW
Utilization of Publie Faeilities Finanein2: Meehanisms
EaGtLa:ke De'ielepmeHt CampllAY illlellds to utilize tHe Ilpprepriate publie fReilities fillllllciRg
meelumisms to HRIlIIee the aequisitioll, eOHstruetien IIRd mainlellanee ef poolie faeilities reqaked
to support tHe planlled ee,+'elapment of EastLalre Creens.
---
m~~,g~g~~~I~~~rm~jjr~i~*9qrr@gm.e~m~l;~_g~~M~;
l;$~IWJY!$i!'iI~qi!II~.i.I!~~~IimI!I99IUq~
!!~t9j~~PRfi?Y,~U
*;:::.~!iii!ID~lii~9!i~mm)I
IIi1Xm1~_g~I,.~n.9i1qEi!i,i!EiIfijl
IT.i~llllI.trll'lllI
B,f!!1f1$f
~!II.~Ii!!_ugIII'llllllllir.~ilil~
9~H
_llr.III~IIIII..Im.~flr.i~I_~!!ligtl!~g~~liI~~i1rlI~i;i
............--._------.------------.----..-.--.....--,.-..-.. -- ........--.............
B. Review of EKistinl!: Finanein2: Meehanisms
Finftnein2: Methods Currently f. vaHable
Ceneral Faud
THe City of Chulll Vista's general fane senes to fund many pllblie services thfOllgilollt the City.
Those [aGilities lIRe serviees identified as being funded by general fllne sellrees repreaent tHose
tHllt will belleflt net only the residellts of tile praposed projeet, bllt also CHal1l Vistll residellts
olltside the bauneanes of EastLake CreeIIs. In most eases, atHer linllllcillg meeHllIIisms are
availaBle to illitially eanstreet or proyide the f-Reility or serviee, and gelleral fllnd monies would
anI)' be eJ(peeted to fllnd tile lflaintenanee costs anee tHe fooilit)' is Ileeepted BY the City.
(9~~J!!I~)
53
Mello R005 cemmunitv Faeilities f.ct of 1982
The Mello Roos Cammllnity Faeilities Act af 19E2 Wltharizes farmation of eommunity faeilities
eistricts '.vhieh are authorized to impose SfJecial !ffi{es to provide the filllllleillg of eertaill publie
faeilities aT sefviees. FaeiH~es v/kiek ea.n Be previtle6 tlfltlef' th.e ~lelle R-eas l.et iaelude the
pur-eHase, eElnstruetiEln, eKpllllsiEln, Elr r-ehabilitatien of tile fullewing:
1. weal park, reereaaefl, aT parkway fReMitics;
2. Eelflelltary Ilfie seeondfIfY seHoal sites 1lfi6 strnetmc3;
3. Libraries;
4. f.ny Eltiler governmelltal faeilities that legislatYie bEldies life autharired to e6nstreet,
OWII or eperate.
SP f. #1 and SPA #2 life leeated witilill Cemmunity Faeilities Distriet No. I, whieh pmvides for
schaal eapacit). far the Sweetwater Ullioll IIigh School District Ilfid Chulll Vista City Sehoal
District.
,,'\ssesSIHf.nt Distriets
Speeialllssessmcllt eistriets may be preposed fer the pUFpa3C af aeljuirillg or eellstrueting eertain
publie imprevement3 IInder tile Mlinieipal Imprevemellt Aet af 1913, the Impr-oyemellt Belle f.et
Elf 1915, Ilfld tile Lighting Ilfld Landscape l\et ef 1972. The general. adlflinistratioll of tile SfJeeial
Ilssessment district is HllIIdled by the responsible poolie ageAcy.
Speeialassesament finllfieing may lJe apprepHate 'uheA the valtle er aenefit of tile publie faeility
em be assigRoo t6 a Sf'eeiHe pr6f'efty. AssessmeRts ar-e 1e'/ietl iR SfJeeifie Rf86tlRtS agafRst eaeh
iflai.~.idtlad f}f6perty 6ft the ea3i3 af fela~ve benefit. Sf'eeiB:l Bsse33ffieats 1ft&)' Be 1:1300 fer both
publicly eedietHed an site l1li6 off site impf6'iemellts.
8P A #1 faJls o;;ithia twe sfJeeia:l aSSeSSfHeftts aistriets (}',.ssessmeRt Distriet ~Jo. 85 2 and
Assessment District No. 86 I) farmed te provide fer the aequisitien or oonstmetian of eeftftin
publie impf6yemcnts, inelueing reser\'eir, pump Stlltion, translflissian IlIId Oil site 'Hater faeilities,
reclaimed water impf6vemellts 1lfi6 street improvemellts all to serve and bellefit preperties 'i/it-hill
the e8\::1Rflaries af the SfJooial assessffi0Rt distriets.
f. portien ef SPA #2 falls 'i'/itkill the bellllearies of ,A.s3eS3mellt District Ne. 852. The eIIgilleef"s
confirmed Ilssessmellt, prior to amortimtien of be lid pnlleipal, totals appreximately $1,466,000.
THe eonfirffied asaessment 'I.-ill be feIlPpertiened te inelu6e the entire 8PA tf2.
8tate and F-edeml Futidin2
f.ltholigH rarely &yailable te fUlld an entirc pr-ejeet, sever-RI Federal ane State HAaneial and
teeflnieal assistllllec pregrams are 1I'.'ailable to publie agelleies, ill partieulllf tile pul3lie seHoel
distriets.
(9.~~~~~)
54
The S'Nect'Nater URion High School Distriet llAe Chulll Vistft City Sehool Distriet ha'te filed
applieatioRs ',vith the State Offiee of Local .'\ssistallee fer preliminMY determinatioll of eligilJility
under the Leroy F. Greelle Seheal Bllileing Lease Purchase Lav,' of 1976.
If l1li11 when State fllnds are made available to the Sweetwater Union High Sehool Distriet and!or
the Chllla Vista City Scheel District, said fURds may, te tile eJ(tent permitted lJy law, be apj3lied
to reducing leeal :!Choal lIistriet filllllleing of sehaol faeility lleedS ineludillg but lIot limited te
special tIlxes IlAd!or lJeHds isslled in aeeor6anee '.'lith implementation af Cemmllnity Faeilitie3
Distriet No. I.
Dedieation
Dedication ef sites by eevelepers fer publie eapital facilities is a com mOil filllllleing teol used
BY mllfiY cities. In the ease of SP.\ #1, the follewing pUBlic sites were, or Me propoaed te be,
dedicated:
(1) Roads
(2) Park site
(3) Open spaee
(4) Elementary sehoal site (pllrtial)
(5) LilJrary site
(6) Firc statieR site
(7) Tr-llRsit site
RegMdillg SPY'. #2, there 'Nill be the additioR of tile following:
(1) HigA school site
(2) Elementary sehool site (partial)
(3) Cammllllity pMk site
( 4) Open space
Subdivisioll Exaetiot1S
NeighlJerhood level IniBlie imj3revements will Be develej300 simultalleeHsly witll relatoo
resiElentialllft6 oommereiaJ.!iHstitHtioHaI slibElivisiaHS.
TRretlgH tHe use af tHe SlibEli'tisioH Map Act, it is tHe respensibility of tile EIc'telepe!' to pre'iide
fer all local street, lItility and recfelltioH impr~vements. THe liae ef sllbdiviaien conditiens IIftd
exaetioRs, where appropriate, will insure tAat the eORstruetion of lleighborHeod faeilities is timed
'lith aetllal de','eIIJplflent.
The impositien of sUBdivisien eonditieHs Ilfid &aetioRs dees Rot preclude the IIse of ether pllblie
facilities finlllleiRg districts to finanee tHe publie imprevemeRts, when apprapriate.
(Q8!3l/!JS)
55
DeveloomeBt Imoaet Fees
De..'elapment Impact Fees are imposed by 'ariolis gayemmellta! agelleies to eOlltribute to tile
fillaneing af eapita! faeilities imprevements witiliH tile City af Chula Vista. The distingllisrnng
footor bet-.veeII a fee IlIId a sllbcli'iisioH exaeHan is tilat exactions life requested af a speeifte
deyeloper for a speeifie pr-ejeet 'i'{Here!lS fees are levied Oil all development prejeets thr~Hghout
the City ar regional I!fe!I pursullfit to an establisHed furmatiaH.
SPA #2, througH policy deeisiolls af the City af Chula Vista Ilfid ether govemillg agencies, are
sHbjeet to fccs established to Help defray costs af facilities whieH will bellefit areas beyend SP.\
#2. These fees inehide:
(1) Iflterim Eastern AfeIl De'ielopment Impact Fees for Streets, December 1987
established to provide finlllleing for road pmjeet3 of regional significanee ill tile area
east of Interstate 805.
(2) TelegfftPH Canyon Drainage Plan (preposed), to provide finlllleing fur eonstrueting
drainage eHanHel ilflproyements.
(3) Sehoellmpact Fees payable to the CHula Vista City Seheel Distriet pllrsuant te the
f.greement betweeII Chula Vista City Schoal District IIRd EastLalIe Developlftellt
Campany dated Deeelflber 9, 1986.
Certaifl fee distriets, ineluding the Interilfl EaStefR AfCII Develepment Impact Fees for Streets
and Ute TelegfftPH Canyon Drainage Plan (pr~posed) ftba'/e previde far the eOflstruetion af the
pllblie fooilities by tile mvner/de'ieleper iH return fer a eredit against r~lIired fees. If tHe teta!
City appro'ied eonstrnetian easts Ilmollflts to mare Utllll the teta! fees which will be reqllired for
tHe eVlfler/ ee'ieleper' s preperty, tHe excess will be reimbllrsed v.AeII flinds are availllble as
eetermilled by the Cit}. MllAager (see De'ieloper ReimlJllrSelflent Agreemellts below). SPt. #2
lflay be subjeet te new fees establisHed to help defray costs of facilities wHieH will bellefit lIfeas
beyond EastLake GreeIIS.
Street LiE:ht and Landseaoe Maintenanee Distriet
EastLakc MaiHtenllllee Distriet Ne. I was IlppfflYed IlIId Ildepted by the City ef Chula Vista
December 17, 1985 pursuant te the pr-ovisions of Divisien 15, Part 2 af the Streets Ilfid
IligH',vays Cede, lJeing tile "Landseaping IlIId Lighting f.et ef 1972" te fllnd by direet bellefit
assossmeAts the maintenanee ef landaeaj'!ed street medians, lllRdseaped parkways Ilfid
sllpplemellta! street ligHting '.vitHin pllblie rights ef way ar dedieated maintenllAce easelfleflts in
the EastLake Develapmellt.
Currently, a pertion ef the SF.\ #2 lies .....ithin the baundaries of EastLakc Maintellanee Distriet
No.1, appr-o'ied IlIId adepted by the City of ChHla Vista December 17, 1985, whieh alsa serves
EastLake SP.\ I. It is IlAtieipllted that SPA #2 will be served eitiler tilrellgh tile expllAsion af
EastLake MaifltenllAee Distriet Nt}. I or tHr-ollgh tile fermatioH of II sepllfftte Maintenance
District.
(.O$!:!MI5!
,o.,.:.:.:.:.;.;::.:,:.,.:_;.,,:_:_:_:_:i
56
Homeowncps Assoeiation/Business ccnteF Ownel'S .\ssoeiation
EastLake I Cemlftunity f,ssociatian IlAd EastLake Busilless Center OViIICfS f.ssaeiation lut'ie
beell forlfted to mllllage, ~ ane Iftaintain priYale reereftlionB:! faeilities llAe apell spaee _
within SPf. # I.
SPA #2 ....ill be subjeet to II CommliHity Asseeiation formed for tile purpose of IftllAaging,
eperaling and maintainiHg priyate reereatioAB:! facilities IlIId epell spaee I!fe!IS withill tile SPA #2.
DevelopeI' R-eimbupsernent ,+.~I'eements
CertaiH fooilities tilat a@e off site of 8Pf. #lllHd SPf. 112 and/or pra'.ide regioftal bellefits may
be eenstrueted in eanjllnetion witH tHe ee'.elopmellt of SPf. ItlMe SPA ft2. In SlieR instliHees,
Developer Refmburaement AgreelfleHts 'I.-ill be exeellted te pf6'iide for a flltllre payaack to
EastLalre Deyelapmellt COlfll'llIIY far tHe additiollal oost of tHese facilities. Putllre de'/elopments
are required te pay book tHefr alloeable shllfe of the eests far tile shllfed faeility 'Nhell
de;w/clepffieat eeetlfS.
Speeial ,+.~l'eemellts/DeveloDment Al!:l'eement
This eategor)" iHeluees special tJevelopmellt programs fer fiRllI1eiflg eeRstrueti6n ef TelegrapA
Canyon Read Ilfid State Reute 125. It alse inehldes IIHY ether speeialarrangemellts bet'Nccn the
City and the developer sueh as eredits agaillst fees, waiver af fees, ar eHllfges for City
construction of speeifie faeilities.
/\ deYelopment Ilgreelflent ean play IlA esseHtial [.Ole in tHe ilflplelflootation of the Pllblie
Fooilities FiHanefng P!Iill. THe Public Facilities Fiftllllefng Plllll clel!fl y eetails all public facility
rerlpoHsibilities llAe assures tilat tHe OOHstruction of all neees3llfY public impro'iemenls will be
apprapriately phased ',vitil aetllal de'ielopment, 'uhile the ee'ielepment agreemellt identifies tHe
ebligatioHs and rC(J.uirelflents of both parties.
B;~R~R.~~~.~~~!I~I'.!!II!I~II.II,I~..WI
~~~i:1i!i~~iii~~~
---
.~I~mqOOg;~~~~~Mm~9~;!ifiqtypn~!!pg~~gg9n~~~!1jMni1i19~~miP;~9fi.!I;m!plR
N9f!,._19~:m~!1~~mi!lmii!~jj~~I~'P'!!RPAJIRE9M~m~jj~~jl~I!!~PRE9RI!~j
(q~l~~!!I~)
57
otas&\iiKlficaevetowtrt(jra6W$lnc;;;rolectwii~r~iilrewvl&jijiijiltdeWiii'\hm!ifttWt(jiects
'l~tli1\~~~~.;..~~~ij.lf~~.1.'f~~m;ijl~~.......... .............................................................................~""............................~.........~.....................
2;;
!>
M'.:"
it
7;
(O~tUl9~)
58
~bl'.a,nt~".1ID
.:~~
~~~~~f.!!~~qf$.
-
Itg~$Y;
~(jtmJiUi~nc~!Wi!it'~
(j~Ei.iiIiI
.. .. ._- .. . ....."
t()8t$l19$)
"............. .
59
-
_iCitn(iJi$
. . ...1 .... ..D"'...:....................... ....... ..................
iDiWe 0 . t"",.ID.;ursemetitA teemeuw
.... ,.,. .. ..... .PeL.. ..,.,.."....... ..... . .,.. ....... .., .,....8 ..... .. ... ..... ..
~~Pm#*t!Ng!~ir!~t
(O~!~Y9~~
60
CHAPTER V
IMPLEMENTATION
As stated earlier, this document is intended to further address public facility needs associated
with Eastlake Greens.
The Public Facilities Financing Plan is intended to both identify the various public facilities
required to support planned development of the SPA #2 Plan and to insure that these public
facilities are provided at the time they are needed. In so doing, the Public Facilities Financing
Plan designates not only on-site public facility needs but also endeavors to address regional or
area-wide improvements needed to serve the adopted SPA Plans plus cumulative planned growth
within adjacent areas.
It is understood that assumed growth projections and related public facility needs are subject to
a number of external factors such as the state of the economy, the City's future land use
approval decisions, etc. It is also understood that the funding sources specified herein may
change due to financing programs available in the future or requirements of either state or
federal law. It is intended that revisions to cost estimates and funding programs be handled
administratively whereas revisions to the related facilities-driven growth "phases" are to be
accomplished through a Public Facilities Financing Plan update process.
(9~{~~!!I~)
61
ATTACHMNET 6
INITIAL STUDY AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Mitigated Negal.\fe Declaration
h /1r'- ('
PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA and the formation
of an Assessment District for various public improvements
PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte
Parkway
PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastlake Development Company
CASE NO: IS-94-l9
DATE: February 28, 1994
A. Proiect Setting
The project site located south of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte
Parkway and this general vicinity (Eastlake and Otay Ranch) do not involve any substantial
soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project.
The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is an air quality non-attainment
basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling unit increase because of the expansion in land
area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the
air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality.
However, because the increase in the projected units is more than 50, compliance with the
City requirement for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, this less-than-
significant impact will be further reduced.
The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek and Salt Creek
drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may neec! additional cumulative
capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boundary but the
impacts of this project would not be significant. These drainage courses do not enter any
potable water sources nor are they a significant source of any ground water.
This property has been used for agricultural purposes for many decades and is void of any
significant vegetation or animal life. The project could affect raptor habitats but given the
limited acreage this is not significant.
There are various streets in the project area which have traffic volumes that may result n
adverse noise levels. Once precise pad elevations r~lative to street elevations are known,
specific mitigation will be identified and implemented. This residential project will not
result in any significant sources of light or glare.
Th~ project as proposed is consistent with the other low-medium densities adjacent to and
in the vicinity of the project site and the population levels are consistent with the project
area.
Public facilities and services including transportation are available and adequate to sCl~M f?
the project site and vicinity. :::-J__:;
- -
city of chula vista planning department -eflY OF
environmental review section CHUlA VISTA
The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant
paleontological resources. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and
any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non-
graded areas.
Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously
implemented.
B. Proiect Description
General Description
The project is an amendment to the adopted Eastlake I General Development Plan (GDP),
which includes EastLake Greens; an amendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan
(SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City
of Chula Vista. The amendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to
reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the
following two categories:
I. Amending the GDP/SP A to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General
Plan Amendment east of the SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels
R-lO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units).
2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refinements with no
net increase of density.
3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake II) for the installation
of public facilities to serve the project.
Included is Table I, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which summarizes the
proposed residential changes.
Description of Land Swap Area Amendment
Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this amendment. The
balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and Eastlake), which was
recently the. subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be covered by a separate
amendment. The purpose of including the areas in this proposed amendment separately is
because they are logical expansions of existing parcels within the Eastlake Greens SPA
plan. The parcels that are expanded by the recent GP A include Parcels R-lO, R-20 and R-
23. Upon favorable action, these areas are proposed to be annexed to the City of Chula
Vista. Following is a description of each of these parcels:
R-IO: The realignment of Orange Avenue to the south expanded
this parcel's boundary. These expanded areas were designated Low-
Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of the density
range (4.5 dulac) is being proposed. The total increase for this
parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and 12 du in areas
previously indicated as Orange A venue/Future Urban).
Page 2
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94
TABLE 1
EastLake Greens site utilization Plan
Existing Residential Land Use statistics
Parcel Density Acres Target Target
Number Ranae Densitv Units
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40
R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105
R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88
R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96
R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45
R-10 5-15 27.9 6.0 167
R-ll 5-15 14.6 6.3 92
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84
R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158
R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146
R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205
R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50
R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74
R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 60
R-27* 25+ 8.9 4.5 40
R-28* 25+ 6.1 4.5 27
TOTAL 412.4 ac 2774 du
*Interim Designation
TABLE 2
EastLake Greens site utilization Plan
Proposed Residential Land Use StatisticE
Parcel Density Acres Target Target Increase(+)
Number Ranae Densitv units Decrease(-\
R-I 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0
R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0
R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0
R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 0
R-9* 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0
R-10 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +79
R-11 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93 0
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2
R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214 0
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0
R-20 5-15 15.7 9.2 153 +11
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5
R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +9
R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 46 -4
R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4
R-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60 0
R-27 0-5 8.9 4.9 44 +4
R-28 5-15 6.1 9.8 60 +33
TOTAL 434.1 ac 6.6 2871 du +97
*Interim Designation: Parcel subject to future SPA Amendment
to be consistent with the General Plan.
1-11-94
R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the
SDG&E easement. The new area is computed at the mid-point of
the Low-Medium density range (4.5 du/ac). A reduction is proposed
for the parcel as a whole to reflect current planning/marketing.
R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20, except that
no decrease in the density is proposed. A net increase of 9 units are
proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA.
A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels.
Description of Density Transfers
This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA boundary to reflect
current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of units (2774 du)
previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density transfers. Refer also to Table
2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land
Swap Areas.
Parcel Number
R-3
R-7
R-Il
R-14
R-15
R-20
R-22
R-24
R-25
R-27
R.28
DU Increase DU Decrease
+19
-5
-5
+2
-23
-20
-5
-4
+4
+4
+33
+62 -62
TOTAL
Description of Assessment District Work
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the
following:
I. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street
lighting and landscaping within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase I).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Page 3
2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm
drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities,
telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable
state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
3.
DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting,
monumentation within the following rights-of-way:
storm drain, base, paving,
landscaping and street
a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300
L.F., Phase 2).
4. DlF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and storm
drain improvements within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F.,
Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F.,
Phase 2).
Discretionary Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area
I. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment
3. Modification to the Eastlake Greens Site Utilization Plan
4. Establishment of District 94-1
5. Annexation
6. Tentative Subdivision Map
7. Design Review
C. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans
The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an
amendment to the more specific land use regulations of the Eastlake Greens General
Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA).
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached
Environmental Checklist Form) determined that the proposed project could have one or
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94
Page 4
more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or
specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below
significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects
will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program which is attached as Attachment "A".
The following impacts are those that were detennined to be potentially significant and are
required to be mitigated to a level below significant. A discussion of each of these
potentially significant but mitigatable impacts from the proposed project follows.
Acoustics
The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project
site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level.
E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant
environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below
significant.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have
been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment "A").
At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review
Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista
General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this infonnation, it will
be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL).
These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must
validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
F. Consultation
I. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94 Page 5
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti
Cinti Land Planning
3625 Midway Dr., #292
San Diego, CA 92110
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and ElR (1989)
Chula Vista Municipal Code
Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager,
EastLakeDevelopment Co. regarding sewage generation in sewage basins,
improvements and financing
Letter dated February 7, 1994, Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources
Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the adequacy of drainage systems
Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlae11i, Vice President Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as
any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
~f
EN 6 (Rev. 5/93)
Page 6
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1736.94
Attachment A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MEASURE
At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or
Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation
Element Roadways. At that time, the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available.
With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate
forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65
exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
MONITORING REOUIREMENT
Prior to granting a tentative subdivision map or design review
approval, a nOl.se study forecasting noise levels and the
appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an
acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required.
I
I
os.1
I
,
'"
'"
~
ffi
.....
......
...;..........
. "......
.....
......
......
.t, .....
.......
0-.....
III
j,l
05-2
5-1
I
OS031
,
I
.....
......
:ft.a~..
.....
......
.....
PO-1
AREA OF DENSITY TRANSFER
.
ADDED TO SPA BOUNDARY
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
C) APPLICANT: Eastlake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
EASTLAKE GREENS
ADDRESS: 900 Lane Avenue General Development Plan Amendment
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: and SPA Amendment
NORTH NO SCALE 18-94-19
.
APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN IS FOLDED TO m INTO AN 8-1/2 X I I FOLDER
BACKGROUND
1. Project Title Eas:tlake Greens GDP /SPA Amendment
2. Project Location (Street address or description)East of SR-1 25, North of
Orange Ave, South of Otay Lakes Rd./ Telegraph Canyon Rd.,
and West of Hunte Parkway.
A.
INITIAL STUDY
For Offic~}l~~x.
.CaseNo.~.
DpSl AmnL 7"'''',D.
RcceiptNo. ~
Date Rec'd. ~
Accepted by "1 ;J~
Project No. FA-
~~~~.DO-~O ..
Related Case No. .
:;"<,,..::'-,-,.,:::_-~
City of Chula Vista
Application Fonn
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. NA
3. Brief Project Description The project is a transfer of D.U. within the
existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) and an expans~on of
the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 dU).Refer to attached Project Descri]
4. Name of Applicant Eastlake Development Company
Address 900 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax# 421.,.1830 Phone 421-0127
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91913
S. Name of Preparer/Agent Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning
Address 3625 Midway Dr., #292 Fax# 223-5108 Phone 223-7408
City San Diego State CA Zip 92110
Relation to Applicant Land Planning Consultant
6. Indicate all pennits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
a. Pennits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendmcnt
-X- Rezone/Prezone
_ Grading Pennit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
_ Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Permit
)( Design Review Application
:K Tcntative Sub<!. Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redcvelopment Agcncy DDA
_ Public Project
+- Annexation
~ Specific Plan
Conditional Use Pennit
Variance
_ Coastal Devclopmcnt
~ Other Pennit 4&1:1P
S$
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from
to
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
_ Grading Plan
_ Parcel Map
Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic Impact Report
_ Haiardous Waste Assessmcnt
Arch. Elevations
= Landscape Plans
_ Tentative Sub<!. Map
_ Improvement Plans
_ Soils Rcport
_ Geotcchnical Rcport
_ Hydrological Study
_ Biological Study
_ Archaeological Study
Noise Assessment
= Olher Agcncy Pcnnit
-X- Olher Proj ect Descripti
WK:F:~_AN","""i":\oc:TnDr:',.,..n", ... 01 ,D_" .n.....nh ... , ._~_ _,.
.
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
I.
a.
161.4 (amend. area)
Land Area: square footage or acreage B53. 2 (SPA areal
If land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose.
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or will existing structure be
utilized? Yes, see proj ect Description.
2. Complete this section, if project is residential or mixed use.
a. Type of development=- Single Family _ Two Family ~ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures 2871 residential du permittted
c. Maximum height of structures varies per P.C. District Regulations
d. Number of Units: I bedroom ~
2 bedroom ...liL
3 bedroom ~
4 bedroom ..liA....
Total Units ~
e. Gross density (DUttotal aaes) 3.4
f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) 6.6
g. Estimated project popu1ation to be determined
h. Estimated sale or rental price range to be determined
i. Square footage of structure to be determined
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures per P. C" Regulations
k. Number of on-site parldng spaces to be provided per P .C. Regulations
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface to be determined
~ Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use.
a. Type(s) of land use
b. Floor area Height of structures(s)
c. Type' of construction used in the structure
d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties
and streets
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
g. ~imated number of customers (pee day) and basis of estimate
~02I..u1 (lid: 1020.93) (Rd: 1022.93)
Page 2
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
1. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
J. Type/extent.of operations not in enclosed buildings
. k. Hours of operation
I. Type of exterior lighting
x , H project is other than residential. commercial or industrial complete this section.
, a. Type of project
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional pr~ject characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. Will the project be required to obtain a pennit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)?
No.
2.
Is any type of grading or excavation of the propeny anticipated?
H yes, complete the following:
a.
Yes, based on future
subm1tta~s.
b.
Excluding trenches to be backfilled. how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
NA
How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? NA
How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
What will be the: Maximum depth of cut NA
Average depth of cut NA
Maximum depth of fill NA
,
Average depth of fill NA
NA
c..
d.
. WPC-~02I.A." (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
Page 3
3. Describe all ene.gy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.)
NnrmAl rp~idential eneray use.
4. Indicate the amount of natura! open sp~ that is part of .the project (sq. ft. or acres)
None.
S. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these
jobs. Construction related jobs.
6. Will highly f1ammable or potentially explosive materials or subs~ccs.be used or stored within
the project site? NA
7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day. will be generated by the project? None in
excess of those addressed in previousEIR.
8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of
access or colU1cction to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following:
new streets; street widening; extension of gas, eleCtric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of those previously
identified for EastLake Greens. (refer to EastLake c'reensPFFP).
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SE'ITING
1. . Geolol!V
Has a geology study been conducted on the propcny? Yes, see Eastlake Greens EIR.
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils report on the project site been made? Yes, see Eastlake Greens EIR.
(If yes, please attach)
2.
Hvdrolol!V
Axe any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site?
(If yes, explain in detail.)
a. . Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground Water table?
No.
~011-A93(Rd:IOJO.931(Rd.1012.93)
Page 4
b.
Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
In previously approved facilities.
Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply,
lake, reservoir or bay? No.
Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to ~ja.cent areas? Potential
exists, but would be mitigated by cond~t~ons to future T.T. map
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. To be determined
by future submittals and previously approved tract map.
c.
d.
3. ~
a. Are there any noise so= in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
No. Future arterials may impact some areas.
b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? No.
4. Biolo!!V
a. Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No.
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural ~tate? No.
c. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the propeny?
Yes x No (Please attach a COPY.)Refer to previous EIR.
d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and
species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project Site is semi-
developed with remnants of previous dry farming/cattle
grazing on the remainder:
5. Past Use of the Land
a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? No.
b. Are there any known paleontological reSources? No.
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
No.
d. What was the land previously used for'! Dry farming/Cattle grazing
WPC:F:\HOMlN"LANNING\STORED\J021_A_9.\ (Rd. I02(t"']) (Rd. i022.9j)
Page 5
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe all Structures and land uses currently existing on the project site.
**See answer below**
b. Describe all structures and land uses CWTently existing on adjacent property.
North Eastlake Business Center
Souili Vacant Otay Ranch - Future development
Bart Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoods
VV~ Eastlake High School/Community Park and Future developmer
7.
Social
a.
b.
. ~one on parcels proposed
Axe iliere any residents on Site? H so, now many?
Axe iliere any current employment opportunities on site? No.
H so, how many and what type?
for an i::;crease
in units.
8. Please provide any oilier infonnation which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project.
Sites have been fully evaluated in Eastlake Greens SPA EIR and
recent General Plan Amendment EIR for Land Swap areas.
See also attached Project Description for add1t1onal da~a.
**Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half
of EastLake Greensr. Parcels proposed for amend-
ment with existing structures are only being
amended to reflect existing conditions with no
increase in units.
WI'C-~NINOISToREDII021_A"3 (Rd. 1020.03) (Ad 1022.931
Page 6
E. CERTIFlCA TION
I, as owner!owner in escrow"
RRstlake Development Company
Bruce Sloan. Proiect Manager
Print name
or
I. consultant or agent"
Print name
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and infonnation herein contained are in all
respects true and COITCCt and that all known infonnation concerning the project and its setting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
~
Owner/Owner in Escrow Signature
or
Consultant or Agent Signature
I / ,d11
I '
Date
"If acting for a colporation. include capacity and company name.
WPC'~021.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
Page 7
",
4.
s.
6.
TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Slatement of disclosure of certain ownership interests. payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which
will require discretionary action on the pan of the City Council. Planning Commission, and all other official bodies.
The following information must be disclosed:
1.
Ust the names of all persons have a fmancial interest in the contract, Le., contractor. SUbcontractor
. ,
material supplier.
EastJake Development Company
2.
If any person identified pursuant 10 (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
iD<Iividuais owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in
the partnership.
:T c: 'Rn~wp] 1
3.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustee of the trust.
ron
Have you had more than $250 wonh of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Commiuees and Council within the pasl twelve months?
No
Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
conU'aCtors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this ~uer.
Bob Santos. Kent Aden, Bruce Sloan, Katy Wr~ght
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contribuled more than $1,000 10 a Council
member in the currenl or preceding ejection period? Yes [ ] No PC] If yes, slate which Council
membe~~: .
........ is defUlOd u: "1Itty iDcIividual. linn, ~rship. joint ......... lIIOCiation, socioI club. fnlllmaI ollaaizalion. c;orponlioa. ....Ie.
InIsI. ....iver. lyIIdicale. dIis and any 0Ibe, COUIIIy. ci1y and COUIIIy. ci1y. lllUllic:ipaJity. district 0' ollie, poIi1ica1lUbdivision, or any OIber sroup
or combinadoa ICCing as I unit.
(NO'IE: AaIch oddilioaaJ ...,.. u .......'1)
Date:
~
Bruce Soan, Jec Manager
Eastlake Development Company
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
WPC:F:\HOME\PLANNINC\STORE.[)\J02IoA.9JRd. I020.93)(Rd. 1022.93)
Page II
Y5-5"f1
Case No. :r:c:; -q"'-f"t
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
I. Drainage
n.
~~!G\4-
A. 1. the project site within a flood plain? tJo.
If so, state which FEMA FIoodway Frequency Boundary. ~u....
B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? Sv~ t:"r.oW
Tl> ~WMffi..rt""b..4J.JD CtTY ~w~p t:.1J#JV~Y.JMV:.1!!. ~YSr1!OM
C. Are they adequate to serve the project? lJo.
If not. please explain briefly. "Pf!D.T,:'/..- ~tAc. ~/~~ tMPIlDll!E:M~~ Wtu..
71L l2e'(UI/C!':~ WIIE#..1 7)~L~r:-...,.,- /'YfJ IDe;.
D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? T,rl t:/"..... 'P/.I
/'A-A1'/~ ('~e~ ~&z. J"'A"'Vr>A/ ,;'4~K 4N:b ~,:,- ~~~L."
I '
E. AIe they adequate to serve the project? NO.
If not, please explain briefly. 72F/.fnt..JAt.. IMAQ.oI/....~e:'.,.,-.::, ~y SEe" 1JE';:&:-'""!:.4./Il.Y
-
IN -n+E. ~~ CANyoN AIJD 0./ r ~~It:. &s,NS AS t::E"l!!.t~~
/)/ /:.~, .
Transportation AIJ ,4M~N'PME.N-r "TO 'fltr!. 7f2,I.FF/G srl/Dy Fi1J.. Ioff! 5I.~~ &~
<;PA If-1R..,Wf/..L BIi TZt:a;Pf~('f% f^,d~,,~ "" ~fc. (;Ji!j 'YMT1e>t./. F14:tvI
What roads provide primary access to the project?
A.
B.
~#,f/;
~
What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? S@C.;) .
C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T.) volumes on the primary access roads before and
after project completion?
Stt~tN~e Befure After
Do any of these volumes exceed the City.s Level-of-Service (L.O.S.) .C" design ADT
volume? If yes, please specify.
WPC~,~CMTOREIN022.93 (R,{. 1021.93) (IIof. 1020.93)
Page 2
Ys -5'1/
Case No. Tt;-Q'l-(q
IT the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly.
. D. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project?
IT not, please explain briefly.
E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at intersections adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site?
IT so, identify: Loca.tion
Cumulative L.O.S.
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). If yes, a Tra.ffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required. In this case the TIA will
have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that
all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-significance.
Yes No
The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required.
G. Is traffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of
the proposed project? Yes No
If yes, please describe.
H. Is the project consistent with the criteria established in the City's Transpol1a1ion Phasing Plan,
General Plan Traffil: Element, and all other pertinent traffic studies? Please reference any
other traffic impact studies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the proposed
project.
I.
J.
Is a traffic study required?
Is there any dedicatiion required?
If so, please specify.
Yes
No
Page 3
WPC"','HOMElPl..ANNlNGISTORED\IO~93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Ref. 1020.93)
Ys -91 I
Case No. r$ ~""-l~
K. Is there any street widening required?
If so, please specify.
L. Are there any other street improvements required?
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary improvements.
M. Will the project and related public improvements provide satisfactory traffic service for
existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions? (Please provide a brief
explanation).
m.
~
IV.
A. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? LJfo.ll<J.Jow..J .
B. If yes, specify these conditions. N,A.
C. Is a Soils Report necessary? y~s E:.)((S-rINa. 5D/I.E. fi:.~T3 MuS-r'RF': 1JtD6..~
~t>/u:. AME:"NI:>i:I:> 7?> (/'IC.Woe: TIrE ~
Land Form N../A . 'FJ2ofl)sep"'\"!) ~ A1:Pep ro THe: EX/ST/~ 1
Af'pRWep ~PA
A. What is the average natural slope of the site?
B. What is the maximum natural slope of the site?
V.
~
AIe there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that
a noise analysis be required of the applicant? UlJK.Nnw..1 . Af..J. Au r:::Ll hAAl=1lr -r7::> ,HF ~p~
~/~ No/se A(JAJ...YSrS WI/..L Be.. ~f~r:> .
VI. Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day?
Solid 2.~ Po/me>". R::'~ D4Y ~vea.. "f1..f-e €.Jt(9r7Al~ APPileIIEr:> c:;'P'A
Liquid.;zS--~D ~r '-IN.!:> t:I:=.12.. ~y &is.:L5 eou~) 6V&<' -ruE rfJ(/"'K7~, A"PRZa/~ 5FA.
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site?
15" f=\Ic.. ?~U>l~ 11o-l.......' ,..,,,."AN <!NJYnN /ffTAY LAVr;:~ ~ Atol~ .It- /2.l/ PI/c,.. ~
f 1
L-IAJ.#f. fA} ~lLe' ""IJ...J!..WAY 1.,- 1<6 ~~e-:, 7J14:r; II.J. ('t"lALL") At-L. ~~ Wll.[ SEE-
~~ ~T't: ~reo.l AN't:J !;Ac.:r cL>~e-K. ~NS '77:) -ru-E -r=..c:-"'o/'t'H
I( ~ equate to s~ f~l~;gr no, please explain) Jolo. ~e ~GtM~
\ \\~ OF mE ~ &~"'U f!A#..NDM. I'It,L.L. <CZ.~ O~ t!AP.l4-c.rrv A-7f"o ReJr1tL -m (J,ENt:..I'{A.L.
~ 1\ '
c.iJ J \ 'J R..w 8vrLrYol rr c.Jr:>rrt.-.ts. AM/!!W nL>fr=i. -.:. TZ> -rJIE: {l"1.& ~JtAP# eA,IJvRAl. ~N.
r:JY p~ ~D ~ f:tA/..:rOp~tfK SE.~ 1M>rN PLAN WrU,.. F.Il!: r!€tfvrpt::r:>.
WPCJ','HOMIN'UNNING\S022.93 (Rei. 1021.93) (Rd. 10211.93) Page 4
Ys-9f (
I Case No.;;r~..q4::fT
VD. National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Reauirements
Will the applicant be required to me a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board
for coverage under an NPDES Stormwater Pennit? YES.
. H yes, specify which NPDES pennit(s) and explain why an NPDES permit is required. AIJ "'-P.bEa:;
'A:="pMIT' po./! ~LlIIt/~ 'J)(~"::~~ J660C.IAT"F-'D WI-rn. ('.I.>I.le..nTlJ>c.T1D~
Ac..7iIl""lIf~. A ~.Irr IS r?1<.<:(1J(f=-> 'B1:=r-LfJ~~ N/,,::::p FIr/liE. 4/1'=--
WiLl ~ 7::>t9rl'2.1IC:='n A+.('b '1Z.F"/'JI..<)CI::: 7YE- n:>AD>cr.-. I>ifaA:Eu..,p"-'EA.tr" IS.
a.b-l>F=.A l~,P.€.~" t!L;AAMJ:JAl "p A IJ ~ t>E.VF".J.N:1Lfe.n- ~ S\... &: .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project?
')( Yes No
Additional comments N.l>t.j~ .
VII. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts, mitigation measures, or other
issues. "f14-e. A-PP1..1G.A",r J..f;A< Rit.e>PM'eD ASS6'<5rJAF.,... 1:>~tG"- FI.'A#r"'.l~
ro/2. 1"UAl I C JM"~I/~M~Af1"Z,.
c:Zjl/9;F
Date
WPC:F,'HQMlN'LANNlNG'Sl'OIlED\1022.93 (R.... 1021.93) (lid. 1020.93)
PageS
Case No. IS .CJ'-f 1'1
FIRE DEPARTMENT
A. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? An!! what is the Fire Department's estimated
reaction time? ~o st. fn 21't\\n. \'t"Or-!-iOh +iVV\p
B. Will the F1I'e Depm:tment be able to provide 111 lldequate level of fire protection for the
proposed facility without 111 increase in equipment or pelSOMel? \( -e S
I
C. Remarks /..J OA-'"
Q' V(LryJf)ilJ.'f/V
F' Marshal
01 /QO /qy
Date
-
.
WI'I:~G'IS'I'OIIEDIIonJ.! (Rtf. 1021.93) (101. I02U3)
,.,. 6
-
.
Case No. _15-'1~- /'1
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
'B.
E.
F.
A. Is project subject to Parks and Recreation Threshold requirements? 'nt:.$'.
If not, please explain.
C.
How many acres of parkland lIe Decessary to serve the proposed project?
'\C ~ \'P~~ oj .::::~ ~p\'4(Jt:.. c....-z,\i12:i..~,Do..
Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project .tequate to serve the
population increase resulting from this project?
Neighborhood ~
Community Parks tJ O.
If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate
to serve the population increase?
Neighborhood 't\"!S"
Community Parks \ ~":> .
To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to:
Provide land? \i~S
Pay a fee? '1'':'>'.
Remarks:
D.
W.~I~
:2 "f . '1 't-'
DItc:
Parks and Recreation Director or Representative
Paae'
WfC:F:~on93 (Ra. I02UJ)(W.I02I.93)
.
Case No. IS,cN-lq
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A.
Does the project affect native plant communities?
If so, please identify which communities.
{\)
Will the project require native planting? (please describe) ifu'jt ~~ ~ .
B. Please identify any important or highly visible hillsides on or Idjacent to the project.
~
-. """"pm, rondiU~ (D MY) wUl '" ",,_ (~....IillWda' ~
~~~~~~~/~ ;;;tJ~,' ~~~n-
C. Of the total area to be developed, how much, and which areas are ex~ed to be replanted
and require supplemental watering? (Please deScribe)fpAt"'f.kWd^ 1'5 ruSt- ~
E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project? ~
.
~
~s ~~~entative
P..e I
WI'C:f:'IIOIoIEIPIANNtGl51'OllElNO:t1.93 (Ilof. 1021.51)) (W. 1021>.93)
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18, 1994
I
/
/
"'"
'.
,
\,- \
(\: -) ~
~!!) ~
SUBJECT:
~
~en Larson, Building , Housing'
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department .
Harty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary school District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Other
Doug Reid
Environmental section
Application for Initial Study (IS- 94-1WFA-~/DO 060 )
Checkprint Draft E1R (20 days) (E1R-_/FB-_/DO )
Review of a Draft EIR (E1R- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-_)
Review of Draft Neg Dec (1S- /FA- /DO- )
The Project consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and ~d to me any comments you have
by 02-01-94 . /----- ------.,
?-:- '
J ~~~/;- C2 -r)~--h~-
~,~}<- J.zP.
Comments:
Case No. IS-94-I9
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1. Name of Proponent: Eastlake Develo'Dment Co.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 900 Lane Ave.. Suite 100.
Chula Vista. CA 91913
3. Date of Checklist: Februarv 24. 1994
4. Name of Proposal: Eastlake Greens GDP!SPA Amendment
5. Initial Study Number: IS-94-I9
Environmental Impacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructures? D D .
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? D . D
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? D . D
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? D D .
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? D . D
f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? 0 D .
g. Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? D D .
WPC F:~OME\PLANNlNG\1136.94
Page?
Comments:
The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no finding
of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized and more
specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City
of Chula Vista General PIan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR
(1985), EastIake Greens SPA & EastLake Trails Prezone & Annexation FSEIR (1989), and
Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with
the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very
minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features.
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
YES MAYBE NO
0 0 .
0 0 .
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
o
o
.
Comments:
The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would
result in an increase of 79 units within the Eastlake Greens SPA. The emissions from
the traffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant when
considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the emissions
from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant.
3. Water. Will the Proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters? 0 0 .
b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns. or the rate and amount of
surface fW10ff? 0 . 0
c. Alterations to the COUISe or flow or
flood waters? 0 0 .
d. Change in the amount of surface water
in any water body? 0 0 .
WPC F,IHOMEll'tANNlNGIJ 736.94
PageS
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity?
.
o
o
f.
Alteration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters?
o
o
.
g.
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
.
o
o
h.
Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
.
o
o
i.
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or
tidal waves?
.
o
o
Comments:
The project site and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh water areas, flood
waters, water bodies, or known ground water. ' There will be a minor change in absorption
rate which will result in minor-less-than-significant change in runoff (see letter from Dennis
C. Bowling dated 2{lf94).
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants )? 0 0 .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? D D .
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
into an area, or in a baIrier to the nonnal
replenishment of existing species? 0 0 .
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? 0 0 .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now
graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as
Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is not significant.
Page 9
WPC F:\HOME\PU.NNING\1736.94
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? 0 0 .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? 0 0 .
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? 0 0 .
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? 0 0 .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now
graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as
Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is not significant.
6.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increases in existing noise levels?
o
o
.
b.
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
o
.
o
Comments:
Traffic volumes on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could increase ambient
noise to an unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At
that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With
this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and
the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65
exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout
traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL)
standard.
Page 10
WPC F,'HDMEII'lANNINGIJ 736.94
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
YES MAYBE NO
o 0 .
Comments:
This is primarily a residential project that will not produce any significant new light or glare.
IT there are any unique sources proposed or established, they will be reguJated through the
perfonnance standards in the Municipal Code.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The proposed project is in a planned community which is internally consistent that
assures land use compatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical
boundaries (the SDG&E transmission lines and East Orange Avenue). The overall
external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay
Ranch, Otay Water District facilities and SR 125 alignment.
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
o
o
.
Comments:
There are no other natural resources such as sand and gravel on site which would be
impacted by the proposed project.
10.
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
o
o
.
b.
Possible intenerence with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
1:1
1:1
.
Conunents:
Given the residential character of the project there will be no involvement of hazardous
materials above that typical of a residential land use. The project will provide adequate
circulation in the case of the need for an evacuation or response plan.
WPC F,'HOMElPLANNlNG\1736.94
Page 11
II.
Population. Will the proposal alter the location
distribution, density, or growth rate of the human
population or an area?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area.
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
housing?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than create housing demands in
this area.
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? D D .
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? D D .
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? D D .
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? D D .
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? D D .
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? D D .
g. A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of
2400 or more average daily vehicle trips
or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips). D D .
Comments:
The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/circulation/traffic (see
memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2/21/94, and letter from Andy
Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94).
Page 12
WPC F,IHOMEllUNNlNGIl736.94
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
governmental services in any of the following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? See page 6 of Appendix ill of the D D .
Initial Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept.) and
16 Thresholds a. FirelEMS below.
b. Police protection? See comments in Chula Vista Police
Dept. Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recommendation
dated 2/4/94 and 16 Thresholds b. D D .
c. Schools? EastLake Development Co. has made the Eastlake
projects participate in Community Facilities Districts
in the Sweetwater Union High School District, and the
Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate
school services in the area. D D .
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
The project will be required to provide adequate
community and neighborhood parks to serve the
population of the project. See Initial Study,
Appendix ill, Parks & Recreation Dept., page 7.
Also see 19 Recreation below. D D .
e. Libraries? The City of Chula Vista currently operates
a library at the campus of the Eastlake High School
during the hours the school library is not in operation.
On a longer term basis, there is a requirement for a library
site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to
finance the facility. 0 0 .
f. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? There will be no substantial or unique impact on
the maintenance of any public facility as a result of the
minimal increase in usage due to this project. 0 0 .
g. Other governmental services? Other governmental agencies
were notified and contacted during the Initial Study;
no other potential impacts were identified. 0 0 .
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Use of substantial amount of fuel or
energy? 0 0 .
WPC F:'IJ:IOME\P'LANNG\l736.94
Page 13
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources or energy, or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
o
o
.
Comments:
The project would result in a minor increase in energy requirements typical of a
primarily residential project. This will not result in a substantial use of fuel or energy
nor new sources of energy.
16.
Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards?
~ MAYBE NO
o 0 .
Comments:
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seven
Threshold Standards.
A. Fire/EMS
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond
to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in
75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard
will be met, since the nearest fire station is one mile away and would be associated
with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
See Appendix ill to the Initial Study, page #6.
B. Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority
1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls
of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See comments in Chula Vista Police Department Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review
Recommendation dated 2/4/94.
c. Traffic
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may
occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections
west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of
arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
WPC F:'HOME\PlANNlNCN736.94
Page 14
The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/circulation/traffic
(see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2/21/94, and letter from
Andy Sch1aefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94).
D. ParkslRecreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,OOO population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
The project will be required to provide adequate community
and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that stonn water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division,m Rick
Engineering, dated 2nt94.; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated
2/23/94.
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed
project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, EastIake Development Co., dated
2/9194; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2/23194.
G. Water
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concunently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee
off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building pennit
issuance.
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health?
D
D
.
WPC F,\IIOME\l'U.NNING\J 736.94
Page IS
b.
Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
.
o
o
Comments :
The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard
or an exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in #1 above.
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public. or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view? 0 0 .
b. The destruction, or modification of a scenic route? 0 0 .
Comments:
The project will not obstruct any public view or vistas. create any demonstrable negative
aesthetic effect or, at this level of review, impact a scenic route.
19.
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The project will be required to meet the recreational needs of its residents in accordance with
City park standards which include recreational facility standards.
20.
Cultural Resources.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction or a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
.
o
o
b.
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building, structure,
or object?
.
o
o
c.
Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would
affect unique etlmic cultural values?
.
o
o
d.
Will the proposal resnict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
.
o
o
Page 16
WPC F:'HOME\PLANNING\J. 736.94
e.
Is the area identified on the City's
General Plan EIR as an area of high
potential for archeological resources?
.
D
D
Comments:
See Section 5.2.3 (pg. 5-3) of EIR"86-4 (Sch: 86052803).
21.
Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of paleontological
resources?
m. MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
See Section 4.7 (pg. 4-75) of EIR-86-4 (Sch: 860522803).
22.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
animal or eliminate important examples or the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
.
D
D
Comments:
As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any biological resources and
therefore, would have no significant impact on any of these resources. Cultural resources
(prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitigated and no further action is necessary.
b.
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-tenn goals to the disadvantage of long-
tenn, environmental goals? (A short-tenn
impact on the environment is one which occurs in
a relatively brief, definitive period of time,
while long-tenn impacts will endure well into the
future.)
.
D
D
Comments:
The proposed project confonn to the Chula Vista General Plan and therefore, the project
complies with the long tenn goals of the City of Chula Vista for the site.
Page 17
WPC P,IIIOMElPU.NNlNG\1736.94
c.
Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small. but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
D
D
.
Comments:
The project impacts are so limited to preclude any significant cumulative impact. In the case
of air quality impacts. the increase of 97 units, or a maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the
existing. and approved units and ADT, the impact is minimal and less than significant. Also,
the site is void of any significant biological or cultural resources and paleontological resources
will be fully mitigated.
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
D
D
.
Comments:
At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental
acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan
Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation ofroadways and residential
development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of
noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior
dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast
and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
Page 18
WPC "'IHOMEll'lANNlNG\1736.94
Mitigation Measures
(To be completed by the Applicant)
I, as owner/owner in escrow'
Blwc €.. /If. S 1...01'1 N
SR. 1"R()~ /l'k;R EI15'rI,(1<L "PEr/ c,.
Print name
or
.
I, consultant or agent
itigation measures herein specified to avoid significant impacts.
z Jt;$) jet'f
Date
Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
o I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
. I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o I fmd the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
;;"'/,;)0/9</
'-dt1 ~a.A(-Il'A J)~o~/ )
Environmental Review Coord' ator' ,
-
Date
'If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
Page 19
WPC F,'lIOMElPlANNlNGI1736.94
Case No. -:I',~' 9 Y - \'1
APPENDIX IT
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AB 3158)
III It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources and that a "Certificate of Fee
Exemption" 8hall be prepared for this project.
It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife, individually or
cumulatively and therefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and
Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. ~"'es~" ~,d
'Y>--""",-,c.':'So',-\ ,-,><'-'" ,"""-,, ~ \ ~ ~C" ~L.o."'e G-.~
G"">,,,,-"\ -!5<: :;)<&c \> ~.,,,"\ ~ \CA" .
'-Ie ~ ...~/ ( 'i <" f) ~1)
Environmental Revi w Coordinator
0i).;rd9 V
Date
WPC P:'HOME\PLANNING\l736.94
Page 20
.
Case No. IS -q'i -I'l
APPENDIX III
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY DATA SHEET
L
D.
Comnt Zoninl! on site: -Yc..
North .
South ,.
East },
West ~
(~ I!n.._u....~)
~I
If
II
./
Does the project conform to the current zoning'? ~~^-...~ ~
general Plan land use ~~:atiL~ ~it~::!,~ -1::~::~.~::~~~~ ~~~;)~ ~~
South
East ~- --',b.,-~i. ^.....A...:T-A ~3-'" Dv/.-k)
West ~ '!-t: I, ., "
,fd-" " I ~~
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram'? --s u..,
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space ~r adiacent to an &rea so designated?
~
m.
e,a--a---- .
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes'? ... "'-r-
Ot ".~ """ " p " m ......" .. _k ..,"" of '"
-;. ~~~~_-r.~,~,::-.I~
Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
School
Elementary ~J-l *' 'l ~ r
lunior High ~aI";~
Senior High ~u. L..
CaDacitv
EnrOllment
Units
PmDosed
Oeoerating
Factors
Students
Generated
Prom Proiect
IV.
1/7
"I'
't7
~~~ ;,:!: :!:.:J 1:~J t; :::~~ J,.,~~
-
.30
.29
.10
2.~
~tl
.0
ib(6,.~;L"",""
:f:J.'L/qi
D I
WJIC:J',~onll3 ~.1021.93) (W.I01O.113J
file 1
ATTACHMENT 7
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TI-lE C. I OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE S'\. .. EMENT
You are required to file a Slatement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign
contributions, on all matters which will require discrctionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
EastLake Development Companv
2. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in thc corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Boswell Properties Incorporated
Tulago Company
3. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is non. profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non.profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
N/A
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of thc City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Commiltees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent contractors who
you have assigned to represent you before the City in this malter.
Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning
Bill Ostrem- EastLake Development
Roger Bhatia - Rick Engineering Co.
Gail Crocenzi - EastLake Dev.
Co.
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the
current or preceding election period? Yes_ No...!... If yes, state which Councilmember(s):
· . · (NOTE:
Attach additional pages as necessary) · · ·
/ ,
~L (;/_ .:. ,C(//I L(l,../
:o1gnature of contractor/a~licant
Gail Crocenzi, Assist. Proiect Mqr.
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
Date:
, .-,
i..-- '._
. /"'
c's,
. Pmoll is defincd as: ~"Y individual, /inn, co-partJIership, jaW YOUU/'C, association, sociIJ/ club, fralmw/ orgmUzaliot~ corporaliOlI, uta'c, trWI, receiYC1, I)fUIicme,
Ihi.s mid allY other cowU)', ciJy alUJ COUIIll'y, ciry mUllicipallty, district, or other po/ideal subdi\uiol&, or WIY other group or combination DewIg tIS Q WUL"
MEMORANDUM
DATE: September 27, 1995
TO: The Chair Person and Members of the Plann' g Commission
FROM: Ken Lee, Assistant Director of Plannin
SUBJECT: PCM-95-11, Agenda Item No.1
Please find attached revised Planning Commission and Draft City Council Resolutions for the
Eastlake Greens SPA amendment. The revised resolutions replace the ones included in the staff
report.
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-95-11
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE
GREENS SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN,
PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan
amendment was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on January 16,
1995 by The Eastlake Development Company; and,
WHEREAS, said application requested approval of an amendment to the Public Facilities
Financing Plan of the Eastlake Greens planned community located on the south side of Otay
Lakes Road between Hunte Parkway and the future alignment of SR-125; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said SPA
amendment application, and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners
within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and,
WHEREAS, The Environmental Review Coordinator has considered Initial Study
IS-94-19 and has concluded that there are no significant impacts anticipated from the proposed
amendment; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.
September 27, 1995 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has held a public hearing and taken testimony; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby recommends that the City Council amend the Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area
(SPA) plan, Public Facilities Financing plan in accordance with the attached draft City Council
Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 27th day of September, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(m:\home\planning\pcm9511.pcr)
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EASTLAKE GREENS
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING
PLAN AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-19
I RECITALS
A. Project Site
Whereas, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented on Attachment A-I attached hereto and
incorporated by this reference, identified as the Eastlake Greens Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) plan, and located on the south side of Telegraph Canyon
Road between Hunte Parkway and the future SR-125.
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1995, the Eastlake Development Company
(Developer) filed an application requesting consideration of an amendment to the
Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area (SPA) plan, Public Facilities Financing
plan
C Prior Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
a General Development plan and Sectional Planning Ares (SPA) Plan and a
Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), previously approved by the City Council
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 27,
1995, and voted to adopt the Negative Declaration issued 0 IS-94-
19 and to recommend that the City Council approve PCM-95-11; and
E. City Council Record on Application
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing
to property owners within 1000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the project
area at least ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
find, determine, and ordain as follows:
n COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
From the facts presented to the City Council, the Council finds that this project
would have no significant environmental impacts and adopts Negative
Declaration issued on IS-94-l9.
III FINDINGS FOR SPA AMENDMENT
The city Council hereby finds that the proposed Public Facilities Financing Plan
amendment as represented in attachment _ is consistent with the Eastlake
Greens General Development Plan and the Chula Vista General Plan and that
public necessity convenience, general welfare support the amendment.
IV NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice
of determination and file the same with the County Clerk
Robert A Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
M:lbome\plalUting\luis\spaamend.res