HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/07/12 (2)
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 7/12/95
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit PCC-95-24; Request to expand
a residential care facility from six to twelve adult residents at 8
Tourmaline Street - Trinidad M. Dela Rosa
The proposal is to expand an existing residential care facility for six elderly residents into a
residential care facility for twelve emotionally disturbed adults between the ages of 18 and 59
years of age at 8 Tourmaline Street in the R-l zone.
Residential care facilities for six or fewer residents are preempted by State law from local land
use regulation and oversight, but the State does not preempt local control for facilities which
accommodate seven or more residents. The zoning ordinance considers such facilities as
"Unclassified Uses" which can be considered for location in any zone subject to the issuance of
a conditional use permit by the Planning Commission and City Council.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that there will be no significant
environmental impacts associated with the project, and therefore recommends adoption of the
Negative Declaration issued on Initial Study IS-95-18.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Planning Commission adopt attached Resolution
PCC-95-24, recommending that the City Council deny the proposal in accordance with the
attached Draft City Council Resolution and the findings contained therein.
DISCUSSION:
Site Characteristics
The site is an 8,700 sq. ft. R-l single family parcel located at the southeast corner of
Tourmaline Street and Hilltop Drive. The property contains a 3,000 sq. ft. dwelling which has
recently been remodelled to include 6 bedrooms, three baths, and two separate family rooms.
The site is bounded by walls and fences of 3-4 feet high on the front and sides, and 5 ft. high
in the rear.
The property is adjacent to R-I single family areas to the north, northwest, and east, and limited
industrial areas to the south and west. The site is elevated approximately 30 ft. above and 60
Page 2, Item _
Meeting Date 7/12/95
ft. distant from the industrial development to the south. The closest single family home is
located 15 ft. to the east.
Adiacent Zoning and Land Use
North -
South -
East -
West -
R-l
I-L
R-l
I-L-P
Single family residential
Warehouse
Single Family Residential
Vacant
Existing Use
The dwelling is currently being used as a residential care facility for up to six elderly residents.
The residents are referred from County social service agencies and generally require little
medical care. Services include lodging, meals, laundry, transportation to necessary medical and
dental services, and cleaning of the facility. Three employees work eight hour shifts, providing
one staff person present at all times. Visitors are allowed between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Such operations are considered by the State to be a "family" for purposes of zoning, and thus
are exempt from any special local regulations or standards other than those which would apply
to any single family dwelling.
Proposed Use
The proposal is to increase the number of residents from 6 to 12 and to change the resident
profile from elderly (60 yrs+) to emotionally disturbed adults between the ages of 18-59 years.
As noted above, any facility serving seven or more residents is not considered a "family" by the
State and thus is subject to all local zoning requirements.
The same services would be provided, but a minimum of two staff would be required in order
to serve the additional residents. Assistance with medications would also be provided, along
with "observation" and other assistance as required. The applicant reports that the residents do
not have their own vehicles and thus there is no need to provide additional parking. The
residents are free to come and go as they wish as long as they sign in and out.
As is the case with the existing operation, the proposed use is a for-profit enterprise. The only
"residents" of the facility are those receiving care, whereas the staff or caregivers come and go
as shifts change. The facility is licensed by the State and would receive residents from the
County Department of Mental Health.
See attached for information provided by the applicant, including operational profile, schedule
of services and staff, and admissions agreement.
Page 3, Item _
Meeting Date 7/12/95
Public Forum
On June 1, 1995, a Public Forum was convened at Loma Verde Elementary School for the
purpose of allowing interested parties to question both the applicant and Planning Department
staff, and for staff to solicit and record comments from neighboring residents. Thirteen
neighboring property owners and residents attended. Minutes of that public forum are attached.
Since the public forum, the Planning Department has received a petition with thirty-one
signatures as well as two letters from the immediate neighborhood asking that this application
be denied (please see attached).
ANALYSIS:
As we have stated several times in the past, it is difficult to find an ideal location for a use of
this type. It is generally acknowledged that there are compel1ing reasons for placing individuals
with emotional and developmental disabilities in a residential setting, particularly where they do
not require an intensive level of care, and the proponents typically believe that these are
primarily residential uses and that a location in a residential area is entirely appropriate. On the
other hand, these are institutional as well as residential uses by the fact that there is a staff and
the occupants are clients as wel1 as residents and often require supervision and a certain level
of treatment in addition to room and board. These differences can create both real and
perceived conflicts with residential areas.
We have generally encouraged such facilities to seek locations in interface areas between
multiple family and commercial districts. This places the clients, which, as in this case, most
often do not drive, within convenient walking distance of commercial services. It also
ameliorates the potential conflicts with and understandable concern of residents by placing the
facility on the fringe rather than in the middle of a residential area, and in an area favoring
similar transitory housing rather than owner-occupied dwel1ings.
In this instance, the facility would meet what appears to be an important social need -- the
provision of shelter, food and assistance for emotionally disturbed adults. With regard to
parking, the property could apparently accommodate the use considering that the clients
generally do not drive, and the staff and occasional guest would normally number no more than
three or four at anyone time. The site is also within walking distance of two convenience
markets at the southwest and northwest corners of Hilltop Drive and Orange Avenue, and there
are bus stops at both the Orange and Main Street intersections with Hilltop.
On the other hand, this property is a standard single family lot located within, albeit on the
periphery of, an R-l single family neighborhood. Generally we would not support an
institutional type use under these circumstances. A finding was made in the case of Casa
Nuestra that the number of clients served is not inconsistent with the size of a larger household
Page 4, Item _
Meeting Date 7/12195
and, in fact, a facility for six or fewer residents plus staff would be permitted as a matter of
right pursuant to State law. Conversely, this dwelling would accommodate up to 12 residents
and two staff at anyone time. Clearly, 14 occupants appears to be well beyond even the largest
household that could be expected in a typical single family home, and would likely generate
activity levels more consistent with multiple family zones.
With regard to need, County Mental Health has indicated that while there is a shortage of
"good" beds for emotionally-disturbed residents, there is no shortage of "total" beds available
to serve this group. While both Community Care Licensing and County Mental Health have
declined to categorize this facility, they have described a "good" facility as one providing a high
level of supervision, a high staff to resident ratio, organized activities, attractive and spacious
surroundings located within easy wa1king distance of a wide range of goods and services, and
public tTansit. By these standards, the proposed facility would appear to provide only the
minimum in terms of physical facilities, staffing, activities and location.
In order to further evaluate the impact this type of facility may have in a single family setting,
the applicant was asked to provide the location of a comparable facility so that staff could inspect
the site and speak with surrounding neighbors if necessary. The applicant referred us to a 15
bed facility run by an individual well known to her at 4311 49th Street in the City of San Diego.
The facility may have originally been a single fami1y residence, and there were several single
family residences on the street, but the neighborhood is one in transition, with multi-family
interspersed with commercial activities, including an auto body shop across the street, and a taco
stand two doors down. Based on the dissimilar character of the area we did not feel it was
worthwhile to interview the neighbors.
County Mental Health and State Licensing were also contacted to determine if they could direct
us to a like facility. State licensing cou1d not help because they do not categorize facilities based
on zoning and/or neighborhood setting, and thus cou1d only direct us to a facility of similar size
but not necessarily in a sing1e family home or neighborhood. We have been unab1e to contact
the appropriate staff from County Mental Health.
We have informed the applicant that should they be able to direct us to an appropriate facility
between now and the hearing date, we will visit the site and report our findings to the
Commission. We also expect to hear back from County Menta1 Health, and will report to the
Commission on that as well.
In Conclusion, however, based upon the information before us and the issues discussed in this
report, we are recommending denial of the request based on the findings in the attached
Resolutions.
Page 5, Item_
Meeting Date 7/12/95
Attachments
1. Commission Resolution PCC-95-24 and Draft Council Resolution
2. Locator and Site Plan
3. Supporting Information from Applicant
4. Negative Declaration and Initial Study 15-95.18
5. Petition and Letters from Neighbors
6. Minutes of Public Forum
7. Disclosure Statement
(a:\pcc9524P.rpt)
COMMISSION RESOLUTION
AND
DRAFT COUNCIL
RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-95-24
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL DENY A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO
EXPAND A RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY FROM SIX TO
TWELVE ADULT RESIDENTS AT 8 TOURMALINE STREET
IN THE R-l (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ZONE
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with the
City of Chula Vista Planning Department on November 23, 1994 by Trinidad M. Dela Rosa,
and;
WHEREAS, said application requests approval to expand an existing residential care
facility for six elderly residents into a residential care facility for twelve emotionally disturbed
adults between the ages of 18 and 59 years of age at 8 Tourmaline Street, and;
WHEREAS, the property consists of a single family residence which is located on the
southeast corner of Hilltop Drive and Tourmaline Street in the R-l Single Family zone, and;
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1995 a public forum was noticed and held at Loma Verde
Elementary School in order to inform and solicit comments on the proposal from the surrounding
neighbors, and;
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-
95-18, and has concluded that there will be no significant environmental impacts associated with
the project and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on Initial Study IS-95-
18, and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said
conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was
given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 21 days prior
to the hearing, and;
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely July 12,
1995, at 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed.
pcc-res.cc
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby recommends that the City Council deny the request in accordance with the attached draft
City Council Resolution and the findings contained therein, and that a copy of this Resolution
be transmitted to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 12th day of July, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
pcc-res.cc
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PCC-95-24) TO
EXPAND A RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY FROM SIX TO TWELVE
ADULT RESIDENTS AT 8 TOURMALINE STREET IN THE R-l SINGLE
F AMIL Y ZONE
1. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically Tepresented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, and commonly known as 8 Tourmaline Street, and for the
purpose of general description herein consisting of an 8,700 square foot lot, with
an existing six-bedroom single family residence, currently used as a residential
care home for six elderly residents, herein after known as the "Project Site"; and,
B. Project; Application for Conditional Use Permit
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Conditional Use Permit, PCC-95-
24, was filed with the City of Chula Vista on November 23, 1994, by Mr.
Trinidad Dela Rosa; said application requesting permission to establish a
residential care facility for twelve emotionally disturbed adults between the ages
of 18 and 59 on the Project Site, herein after known as the "Project"; and
C. Public Forum Record on Application
WHEREAS, on June 1, 1995, a public forum was noticed and held at Lorna
Verde Elementary School in order to inform and solicit comments from
surrounding property owners on the Project, and the minutes resulting therefrom
are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the
Project on July 12, 1995 and voted _ to recommend that the City Council
deny the application in accordance with Resolution PCC-95-24, and the
proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning
Commission, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby
incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
E. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on , 1995, to
receive the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to hear public
testimony with regard to same, and the proceedings and all evidence on the
Project introduced before the City Council and the minutes resulting therefrom
are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
F. Environmental
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial
Study, IS-95-18, and has concluded that there will be no significant environmental
impacts associated with the Project and recommends adoption of the Negative
Declaration issued on Initial Study IS-95-18.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
determine and resolve as follows:
II. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make the findings required by
the City's rules and regulations for the issuance or denial of conditional use permits or
modifications thereto, as hereinbelow set forth, and sets forth, thereunder, the evidentiary
basis that permits the stated finding to be made.
A. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the
neighborhood or the community.
The County Department of Mental Health reports that there is no shortage of total
beds within the area to serve the emotionally disturbed population which would
be served by this facility. Although there is a shortage of "good beds" to serve
this population, based on the factors noted by County Mental Health and
Community Care licensing in describing "good beds", i.e., a high level of
supervision, a high staff to resident ratio, organized activities, and attractive and
spacious surroundings located within easy walking distance of a wide range of
goods and services and public transit, the Project and Project Site would appear
to provide the minimum in terms of staffing, physical facilities, activities and
location.
B. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety or generat welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
The introduction of a residential care facility with as many as 14 occupants at any
one time is inconsistent with the family size and activity levels generally
associated with an R-1 single family zone and neighborhood, and could adversely
effect the residential enjoyment of surrounding residents. The neighbors have
expressed concerns about the level of supervision with the existing facility
wherein residents have been observed wandering the neighborhood in a state of
confusion and, on occasion, unclothed. The neighbors have also expressed
concerns about the change in population from elderly to emotionally disturbed
residents and the impact this may have on their security, understanding that the
residents are free to come and go as they please and can require psychotropic
drugs in order to function normally.
C. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in the code for such use.
Other than Building and Fire regulations, the Municipal Code does not specify
regulations or conditions for such uses, but rather specifies the requirement to
obtain a conditional use permit and comply with any conditions deemed
appropriate to apply in any particular case. In this instance, there are no
conditions deemed adequate to address the shortcomings of the use at this location
as described in the findings above.
D. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the
general ptan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this permit would be inconsis'tent with city policies to protect and
enhance the residential quality and enjoyment of existing residential
neighborhoods.
III. DENIAL OF PERMIT
The City Council hereby denies Conditional Use Permit PCC-95-24 to expand a
residential care facility from six to twelve adult residents at 8 Tourmaline Street in the
R-I Single Family zone.
IV. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
Presen ted by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
(m: \shared\planning \pcc9524C. res)
Approved as to fOTffi by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DENYING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (PCC-95-24) TO
EXPAND A RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY FROM SIX TO TWELVE
ADULT RESIDENTS AT 8 TOURMALINE STREET IN THE R-I SINGLE
FAMILY ZONE
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, and commonly known as 8 Tounnaline Street, and for the
purpose of general description herein consisting of an 8,700 square foot lot, with
an existing six-bedroom single family residence, currently used as a residential
care home for six elderly residents, herein after known as the "Project Site"; and,
B. Project; Application for Conditional Use Pennit
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Conditional Use Pennit,
PCC-95-24, was filed with the City of Chula Vista on November 23, 1994, by
Mr. Trinidad Dela Rosa; said application requesting pennission to establish a
residential care facility for twelve emotionally disturbed adults between the ages
of 18 and 59 on the Project Site, herein after known as the "Project"; and
C. Public Forum Record on Application
WHEREAS, on June I, 1995, a public forum was noticed and held at Lorna
Verde Elementary School in order to infonn and solicit comments from
surrounding pToperty owners on the Project, and the minutes resulting therefrom
are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the
Project on July 12, 1995 and voted _ to recommend that the City Council
deny the application in accordance with Resolution PCC-95-24, and the
proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning
Commission, and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby
incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
E. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held
before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on , 1995, to
receive the recommendation of the Planning Commission and to hear public
testimony with regard to same, and the proceedings and all evidence on the
Project introduced before the City Council and the minutes resulting therefrom
are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding; and,
F. Environmental
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial
Study, IS-95-18, and has concluded that there will be no significant environmental
impacts associated with the Project and recommends adoption of the Negative
Declaration issued on Initial Study IS-95-18.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
detennine and resolve as follows:
II. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make the findings required by
the City's rules and regulations for the issuance or denial of conditional use pennits or
modifications thereto, as hereinbelow set forth, and sets forth, thereunder, the evidentiary
basis that permits the stated finding to be made or fail to be made.
A. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a
service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the
neighborhood or the community.
The County Department of Mental Health reports that there is no shortage of total
beds within the area to serve the emotionally disturbed population which would
be served by this facility. Although there is a shortage of "good beds" to serve
this population, based on the factors noted by County Mental Health and
Community Care Licensing in describing "good beds", i. e., a high level of
supervision, a high staff to resident ratio, organized activities, and attractive and
spacious surroundings located within easy walking distance of a wide range of
goods and services and public transit, the Project and Project Site would appear
to provide only the minimum in tenns of staffing, physical facilities, activities and
location. Thus it cannot be found that the facility is necessary or desirable to
serve the general well being of the neighborhood or the community.
B. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or
working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
The introduction of a residential care facility with as many as 14 occupants at any
one time is more consistent with the densities encountered in a multiple family
zone than with the family size and activity levels generally associated with an R-l
single family zone and neighborhood, and could thus adversely effect the
residential enjoyment of surrounding residents. The establishment of multiple
family densities and activity levels within a single family zone is found to be
contrary to good zoning practice and detrimental to the general welfare of the
neighborhood.
C. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in the code for such use.
Other than Building and Fire regulations, the Municipal Code does not specify
regulations or conditions for such uses, but rather specifies the requirement to
obtain a conditional use permit and comply with any conditions deemed
appropriate to apply in any particular case. In this instance, there are no
conditions deemed adequate to address the shortcomings of the use at this location
as described in the findings above.
D. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the
general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this permit would be inconsistent with good zoning practice and
city policies to protect and enhance the residential quality and enjoyment of
existing residential neighborhoods.
III. DENIAL OF PERMIT
The City Council hereby denies Conditional Use Permit PCC-95-24 to expand a
residential care facility from six to twelve adult residents at 8 Tourmaline Street in the
R-l Single Family zone.
IV. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(m: \shared\ plann ing \pcc9524C . res)
--~/ I - ~ L
I" CN) n n
)~ .,.4
:-4
ORANGE AVENUE
- [
= ~30
-
-
- ~ -
- CASA NUESTR.';' SHEL TER.
- '--
- .
- -
-
- * ~
, WAY i--
. 'I
~
-( R1) ---
-
I ,~ \ ~ * iii , .-
:::fESTIVAL W * ~ * 3 >---
t .~ ~ > .. r--
s
J""'R2T' I~ -~ 0 I--
tR1-7~ c ~\
""-.: I <<
J ...
..... c.. A.
1~~D7 8 fI)
~ " ~
I /~
I
-- r,< -
./.I\~ ~/OAY C1 :r: >...-h'F~"'" -
.. "II / ~ *
/ \'\ 7 * * * *.. ~ * ~
*
I I ~""..U"' n. ~
I I
I I '.,." .t * .:~ * \*
_n L___
I r - - _J ~ 1~1.P7 "
II i PROJECT I
@I\ ~ LOCATION ~.
- -------- WAREHOUSES
II CD
I! \.~
,I
- MAIN STREET ~
1 f I ' I I I ,,~;
I I I ! I I
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT Trinity Adult PROJECT DESCRlPllON,
C) APPLICANT'
. Residential Care CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
PROJECT 8 Tourmoline Street Request: Residentiol care facility for 12 people'
ADDRESS,
(Increosing copocity of an existing facility).
SCAlE, FILE NUMBER: *
NORTH No Scale PCC . 95 . 24
EXHIB" A
LOCATOR AND SITE PLAN
"
~~ ~~ Y "-"""1;,-- -;::....,
~~ Z(\J~~~--
_ ('R4,lvGC - s: ~ II.
g ~ ~~~ r
J~
=:1
,..... - ....,.... r'" ('
1;( C[ r-- "'::",,"~""::";- r,r ~
l..~i;..J l .. _ _ -.",/ '......;r .......f.,....
~r~; ~ /',; f'";.,- ::,.....!""t-....~
'J ./ '\J: ' . r-- ;.~:;.~.';:\!;~;~;'O-
/ ....,..r,......I........ _
. _.,. .r.....' _ t'",.'~ ,-
. _ 2 ,..,.',.;~~.::"irr~:
~....: ...~... .r... ,",',.."_
.~ - ....L--....,-.,.,.,...r,...
..... U r--- r. ,r.. .',.1"' .}., ""t.r
11 If "-,J'.""
ORANGE AVE.
L.:J
:::::::::
==
iOII
~ -//~
....~ ~
C _ ...r
2'" .J\-
o-~ 8
...- 8).- 1 if"
- ""- /r....
-
=
=
==
==
-
I .
~"';j..
L--'I..I..~
~....
'-- ',7., =t
=
-
w
->
a:
o
~~
.,.J-
TlI
~ y II 1// ~'-. ~iA~~
"'J1 j-~
';~Ji _ ..J
T
....- ~-
I '- ...'---- I-- I ..J JA "
:--:::-- :V<,-= c' v- F AV""""
,,::::--v/ ~ J ~
,
y
I.'
~~N
c......" .. .
. J r
l.-
" ~
'.'./" ~
,.f '/
,I
I
-
,--
......
\
-
-
-"\ -,),~
~ / Z-~;f
~ --~.
-
-.
:-:
-
!U - f<$
PROJECT - ;r'\
LOCATION --/
-
.\
I
I
I
"
- ~illJIIJIJ
c ~
:> \oJ
o \oJ
~l J~
- II: BRITTON 'ST.
""All-!
"1"~
.
I.-
-
I
.
--
-
"
n
'-
\oJ
U
c
::IE
11
I
I
CHULA VISTA PLANNIN~ DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR APPUCAIifT: Trinity Adult Residential PROJECTDES~ON:
C) Care CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
ADDRUI: . TourmallDe Street Request: Residential care facility for 12 people.
Inncreasina capacity of an aistin& facility).
'CALI: FU NUMaJI:
NORTH 1" = 400' PCC-95-24
-J
~
~
...\
T . ..1.Q1 ..,....,-:>.,."1...L,.Oa~
~ J...L.A.lloJ. ........"...... u:. .Y.,,."
"~';;l:
I II
I
Ii
\
\\
\:.. >,
~} ~$
1~
--1
!
\.:~
~- ~
" ~<""'~
t. /'
~ ':, ,~I( "
~;I-
^ "I ~
I i .;.:t
i: j - ,
":, '~i
-~.; ~,-. "'\
i: [[ill' I'
"
, i
.
~
~
'<...
L___.
,,-."
,e.'"
.<
, "
" <
,
~~
;~
~
.'-' ...."
I ~ (~ H, j
~~; i~. ~t
.r- ~ ~! ~ 3 &
': _ _ ~ -s.l......
=1''-''''
'-I
...
~~~
!~:
,,~~
/ /
I
II
,
,
--~'-'------f--"'-.
"
.'
.~o;; "3~~9----.f'
~=~.~.
"0
.~ ~
.?
..<
."
~
~
5
i~
~~
\
"
tt
... 0"-.....
~-..'-..,.-.
'.
'.
"
.
,,";"l
'.
.~ :
".
.^
i'
"
~~
\,
.1
~'
i
. i_. ,
i
"
~.."i
.,
~"',.'
Ie' .f
~ C, C-
.' {fo', -I~
., ,'" < c -,;' ~
- :r "' ,., -
,," , .J .
i "Ej ~ ~ L "
,~ ... G ., "
~ Z
;:,.;W\ N C"
...:)- " "- ,-
~:.:"'- '" '.
." ~~~ ~ - " < ,
\- ..
, -
E:: 'I, :\
"
J\ ,I.'
'i ~ ....
c \:> ..
~
\-- -' .I. :.[
, < 1 u.I .
'" .
3 '" T:
..J 'f\ '::l -
,,c ..J 'l 1'1 :,
...'''.M '1,:)1";
,/......,1"7 ":'''''1
"
,
1
.
'0
F',L
~
,
<
.'
.
"
, , , ;~
! ~~ ~~
~i.i ~il. n
'9
:;;
~.:
o
h~
"r,~
"
'"
,
" 0
" t
. 0 :;;
.
.~ .c =-
.'
.
~ ,
, / / / /
<
~
.
"'
" t
r
0
- ~'
~ ~
0,.,.
" "
:
,~
1"
"
.
~~
'!.
:!'
'<to!
~!
~~
-,
"i
~
~i
..
':1~
C!~
~
....,0..
"I"'''
~~'>I7'4.'i
~'!~..
{ .
v ..
~Ii{
.. '
.. ~ - '....1.\4 '",,*~4 J,......,
~:' .:"(, '.: :)~".
r-
,0
(( I T
.:>
r
1;:
-:1.
....
T
'"
(.' .
, ~ i, _ "
... .;.."
,":'~;. "'/0'
; :f':","'~:;:",.,-,
,
I\[
-,
r I
.[
.\
L,
d::
'0
'::\
,
\LI
1
.'
,
'\:....
\ '
\J
'\>.'.
,
",'
~,>
C)
,~-\
~
,
'- ':
.{ .:1 <..
..J.<~
~..-,-
i~\~
,[2'.... '-.;
~:) ......\
-' 0{ ~
:r:: ~ -' 'J
~
~...J{-:
,j 1:~-:t
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
FROM APPLICANT
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
OPERATIONAL PROFILE
Trinity Adult Re8idential Care Home, started as a place to
provide a quality residential care home for individuals between
18 to 59 years old, placed by the county medical services,
with allowable conditions which requires incidentaI medical
services who are mentaIIy and physicaIIy capable of operating
equipment for their own use. We aIso provide care for persons who
because of forgetfulness or physical limitations need onIy be
reminded or to be assisted to take prescribed medications,
persons with temporary emotional disturbance resulting from
personaI loss or change of living arrangement (their Iength of
stay in the facility depend on physician's recommendation)
We provide these individuaIs with three square meaIs a day
and snacks, do their laundry, and take them to recreational
centers, medicaI/dentaI appointments, banks, and library.
,
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
The facility is a non-medical care facility which normally
is not allowed to provide medical or nursing care. This type of
residentiaI care faciIity is licenced by the Department of SociaI
Services.
A. The basic general services rendered to client are the
foIIowing:
1) Lodging:
a) single room
b) doubIe room
2) Food Services:
a) 3 nutritious meal daily and snacks
b) speciaI diets if prescribed
3) Laundry services
4) Cleaning the clients room
5) Offering comfortable and suitabIe bed including fresh linen,
cIean bathrooms and toilet with sufficient shampoos, soap,
toothpaste if necessary
6) Making plans, arrange and/or provide for transportation to
medicaI and dentaI appointments
7) To planned activity program for cIients
8) To notify the clients famiIy and other appropriate person or
agency of client's needs
B. The basic personaI services rendered to cIient are the
foIIowing:
1) Continuous observation and supervision
2) Assistance with bathing and personal needs if needed
3) Assistance in meeting necessary medicaI and dental needs
4) Assistance, as needed, with taking prescribed medications in
accordance with physician's instructions
5) To caII paramedics 911 to police ,in case of emergencies
occur in the facility
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
WORK SCHEDULES
LETICIA R. TUVERA 8:00 AM TO 4:00 PM
(MANAGER)
MONDAY TO FR IDA Y
VIRGINIA BAUTISTA 4:30 PM TO 1:00 AM
(DUTY MANAGER)
MONDAY TO FR IDA Y
TRINI M. DELA ROSA 1:00 AM TO 8:00 AM
(OWNER/ADMINISTRATOR)
MONDAY TO SUNDAY
RELIEVERS:
URSULA PEDRO
RICHARD BORROMEO
NOTE: IN CASE YOU CANNOT MAKE IT ON YOUR SHIFT LET THE
ADMINISTRATOR KNOW AHEAD OF TIME AT LEAST 3 HOURS ADVANCE.
,
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
ADMISSION AGREEMENT
All community care facilities are required to bave written
admission agreement between tbe facility and eacb client/resident
(or autborized representative) who is received for services
pursuant to applicable sections of the California Code of
Regulations, TitIe 22, Division 6.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Trinity Residential Care Home
8 TourmaIine Street
ChuIa Vista, Ca 91911
AduIt Res. Facility
(619) 476-1343
2. BASIC SERVICES
A. Tbe Licensee shall provide the following basic services:
Name of cIient/resident
SSN (optionaI)
ooB
1. BASIC GENERAL SERVICES:
a) Lodging: Semi-private room
b) Food Services: three nutritious meaIs daiIy
snacks
special diets if required
c) Laundry service
d) CIeaning of resident bedroom
e) Comfortable and suitable bed including fresh linens
weekly or more often, when necessary
f) PIan, arrange and/or provide for tranportation to
medical and dental appointments
g) Notification to family or other appropriate
person/agency of resident's needs or requirements
2. BASIC PERSONAL SERVICES:
a) Continuous observation, care and supervision, as
required
b) Assistance with bathing, dressing and other personal
needs, as required
c) Assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental
needs
d) Assistance, as needed, with taking prescribed
medications in accordance with physician's instructions
unless prohibited by law
e) Bedside care for minor temporary illnesses
,
B. The monthly rate for basic services is $
or the SSI/SSP established rate or a government funded rate
of $
C. Basic services are paid in advance.
3. OPTIONAL SERVICES
A. The licensee will provide the following optionaI services
for additional charge:
SERVICE
TIME INTERVALS
RATE
1 )
2)
3)
B. Total monthly rate for optional services is $
C. Optional services are paid in advance.
4. TOTAL MONTHLY RATE (BASIC & OPTIONAL) IS $
5. EVICTION PROCEDURES: ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
A. The licensee/administrator of the facility may, upon thirty
(30) days written notice to the cIient/resident, evict the
resident for one or more of the following reasons:
1) Nonpayment of the rate for basic services within ten days
of due date.
2) FaiIure of the resident to comply with state or local law
after receiving written notice of the alleged violation.
3) Failure of the resident to comply with the written general
policies fo the faciIity which are for the purpose of
making it possible for residents to live toagether.
4) Non-compatibility with other clients/residents.
5) InabiIity fo the licensee/administrator to meet the
resident's needs. Based upon a reassessment, the faciIity
is not appropriate for the client and the client has been
given the opportunity to reIocate.
6) Change of use of the facility.
B. The Iicensee/administrator of the facility may, upon
obtaining prior and/or documented telephone approval from
the Iicensing agency, evict the cIient/resident upon three
(3) days written notice to quit. The licensing agency may
grant approvaI for the eviction upon finding of good cause.
C. The licensee/administrator of the facility shall, in
addition to either serving thirty (30) days notice or
seeking approval from the Department and serving three (3)
days notice to the resident, notify or maiI a copy of the
notice to quit to the resident's authorized representtative.
A written report of any eviction shaII be sent to the
licensing agency within five (5) days.
6. FACILITY VISITING POLICY:
,
Hours: 9:00 AM - 7:00 PM DAILY
Bringing and giving over-the-counter medications to residents
without the knowledge of the facility staff is prohibited.
7. NOTICE OF RATE CHANGE:
If rates are increased, the resident or authorized
representative wilI be given at least 30 days written notice
of the change. However, residents whose care is funded at
rates prescribed by government funded programs may have the
basic rate change effective on the operative date of any
change made in that program without notice.
8. MONTHLY RATE:
The total monthIy rate set forth in this agreement will be
prorated on a daily basis upon the client/resident's
admission to the faciIity during the month.
9. REFUND POLICY:
No refund shall be issued to resident if he decides to leave
the faciIity any day within the present month.
10. HOLDING RATE FOR BED:
If the resident Ieaves the facility temporariIy; i.e. go on
vacation with family or has been admitted to the hospitaI,
the hoIding rate for his bed wiIl be the monthIy basic
services rate.
11. The facility will not be responsibIe for any valuables or
personaI property brought into the facility unless these
items are delivered to the licensee/administrator for
safeguarding.
12. The resident wiI not be destructive of the property of the
facility or that of the other cIients.
13. The resident shall provide thirty (30) days notice of intent
to move from the facility unIess the resident's physical
condition prevents this being done.
14. The signature of the Client/Resident or Authorized
Representative below, indicates that he/she has read, or had
read and expIained to him/her, the provisions of this
agreement voluntarily.
15. PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT:
CLIENT/RESIDENT
DATE
LICENSEE/ADMINISTRATOR
,
DATE
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AND
INITIAL STU DY
negative
declaration
PROJECT NAME: Trinity Adult Residential Care
PROJECT LOCATION:
8 Tourmaline
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
623-290-5000
PROJECT APPLICANT: Trinidad M. Dela Rosa
CASE NO: 15-95-18 DATE: May 12, 1995
A. Proiect Setting
The project setting consists of a 8,700 square foot parcel with an existing six bedroom single-
family residence. The residence is currently used as an residential care facility for up to six
elderly and/or indigent residents. The facility is a non-medical care facility for individuals
between 18 to 59 years old, who are placed by County Medical Services. These individuals
may have conditions, as outlined below, which require incidental medical services, but the
clients are mentally and physically capable of operating equipment for their own use. Care
is provided for persons, who because of forgetfulness or physical limitations, need to be
reminded or assisted in taking prescribed medications. Clients may be persons with
temporary emotional disturbance, resulting from personal loss or change of living
arrangements.
The residents length of stay depends upon a physician referral and vary. Individuals with
any type of violent outbreaks or criminal records are not permitted in the facility. Services
provided by the present three staff members include lodging, meals, laundry, transportation
to necessary medical and dental services and cleaning of the facility. Visitors are allowed
on the premises between 9:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m.
Single-family residences are located to the north, east and west and a warehouse, an
industrial use, is located to the south. The average graded slope of the site is 2 %.
B. Proiect Description
The project applicant has submitted a request to convert the facility from an that of elderly
care to obligatory adult care and increase the capacity of the existing residential care facility
from six to twelve residents. Services which would be provided would essentially remain
the same and be provided by the same staff. Community Care Licensing has indicated,
however, that the increase to twelve residents would require an increase in staffing levels,
regardless of the type of disability.
The two parking spaces in the garage and three spaces on site are provided for the facility.
City of
~{lt-
~.-
p..,;;-----
,~~~
eIIull vlatl planning deplrtment 01Y OF
envlronmentl' ,."Ie. Hcllon. OiUlA VISTA
The applicant will be required to comply with any requirements of the Sweetwater Authority
to ensure that impacts to water facilities are less than significant.
Building and housing has indicated that bedroom window sizes must meet emergency escape
requirements of Uniform Building Code Section 1204. The applicant will be required to pay
additional sewerage fees due to the change in use and increase in sewer generation from the
parcel. The proposed capacity increase of the existing facility requires the approval of a
Conditional Use Permit.
C. Comvatibility with Zoning and Plans
The proposed project site is zoned R-l and designated for low-medium residential. A
residential care facility is a conditional use in the R-l zone. The project is in compliance
with the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental
Checklist Form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant
environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be
required. This Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines.
E. Mandatorv Findings of Significance
1. Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the
environment, substantiatly reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten levels,
threaten to eIiminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory?
The project site is currently used for a residential care facility and there are no
significant resources present. There are no habitats of fish or wildlife present. There
are no cultural resources present.
2. Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to
the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals?
The short-term goal of providing residential facilities to adults who have special
needs and require daily living support will be provided. The proposed increased
capacity to an existing residential care facility will not have the potential to be a
disadvantage to long-term environmental goals provided that the program meets with
all of the code requirements.
3. Does the project have possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable? As used in the subsection, "cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are
Page 2
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the
effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.
The increased capacity of a residential facility will not have any cumulative adverse
impacts on the environment. Rather, the program will provide for increased housing
to adults who are eitheT physically or mentally limited and who require residential
care support services which are provided by the applicant.
4. Will the environmental effects of a project cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly.
The proposed project is in compliance with threshold standards for fue, police, and
other public services as discussed in the threshold section of the Initial Study. The
proposed project will not cause significant environmental impacts to humans, either
directly or indirectly.
F. Consultation
I. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: Susan Vandrew, Planning
Barbara Reid, Planning
Ann Pedder-Pease, Planning
Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent:
Al AlejandTo
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public
review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent
Page 3
judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the
environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
EN 6 (Rev. 5193)
Page 4
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Name of Proponent: Trinidad M. De La Rosa
2.
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Lead Agency Name and Address:
3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 8 Tourmaline Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
4. Name of Proposal: Trinity Adult Residential Care
5. Date of Checklist: May 12, 1995
Case No. 95-18
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
Page I
PoleDtillUy
PoleDtiaJly Sipiflcllnt Leutblln
Slgnlflunt Unless Signi(k.nl N.
Impact Mitig.ted Impllct Implld
I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 181
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 181
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., 0 0 0 181
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 181
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)?
Comments: The project area is zoned RI and generally planned for Low.Medium residential
development. The proposed project is consistent with the zoning and general plan designation.
II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 181
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 181 0
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 181
housing?
Comments: The proposed residential care facility will serve the existing population and the
additional residents may be drawn from other areas, however the impact is negligible.
III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in 0 0 0 181
geologic substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 181
overcovering of the soil?
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 181
features?
d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 0 181
any unique geologic or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 181
either on or off the site?
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
Page 2
Pottmtlally
Potentially Signifiunt Leu tba..
Signifiunt Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigated Impact Impact
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach 0 0 0 181
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay inlet or lake?
g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 181
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
Comments: No new construction is proposed; no impacts are expected.
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 181
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 181
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 181
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 181
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 181
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 181
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 181
groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 181
i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 181
waters?
j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 181
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments: The proposed project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial
alterations to the existing water system. Once the fire flow is provided to the Sweetwater Authority,
the Authority will determine if new water systems are required. The City will work with the
Authority to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to serve the site.
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 181
an existing or projected air quality violation?
WPC F\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
Page 3
e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or
non-stationary sources of air emissions or the
deterioration of ambient air quality?
Comments: This project will not create substantial air emissions or bring about the deterioration of
ambient air quality.
h) A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400
or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or
more peak-hour vehicle trips.)
Comments: The project is expected to generate 36 ADT; 18 ADT over existing use and 26 ADT
over the zoned use. These volumes do not exceed the City's level-of-service (L.O.S.) "C" design
ADT volume. In addition, as the residents of the care facility require transporation services (therfore
do not drive), the trips generated are over the current activity are expected to be negligible. The
primary access roads are adequate to serve the project and traffic mitigation is not required; impacts
are considered to be negligible. The two parking spaces in the garage and three spaces on-site are
adequate for the facility.
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
d) Create objectionable odors?
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION. Would
the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion?
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site?
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists?
t) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts?
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal result in impacts to:
Pot~DtlaJly
Potentially Significant Lep tban
Signifiunt Vale.. Significant No
Impatt Mitigated Impllet Impact
0 0 0 ~
0 0 0 ~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNTNG\STORED\1718.94
Page 4
Potentially
Poteotially SignifiUlnt Leu than
Significant Unless Significant N.
Impact Mitipted Impact Impact
a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 0 181
concern or species' that are candidates for
listing?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? 0 0 0 181
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 181
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal 0 0 0 181
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181
f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181
efforts?
Comments: No biological resources will be impacted, as the site is currently developed as a single-
family residence.
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 181
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 181
inefficient manner?
c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 181
protection, will this project impact this
protection?
Comments: The proposed project involves increasing capacity to an existing facility and the impact
to energy and mineral resources is considered to be negligible.
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 181 0
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 181
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 181
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 181
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 181
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments: Increasing the facility capacity will not result in any health hazards, as the site will be
required to comply with building codes for the proposed capacity, to ensure that people are not
exposed to health hazards.
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
Page 5
Potentially
Potentially Sipifiunt Letstban
Signifitant Unless Signifiunt N.
Impatt Mitigated Impad Impad
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 jgI 0
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 jgI
Comments: The project applicant has submitted a request to increase the capacity of the existing
residential care facility from six to twelve residents. The facility is a non-medical care facility which
normally is not allowed to provide medical care or nursing for individuals between 18 to 59 years old,
placed by the County Medical Services with allowable conditions which require incidental medical
services, who are mentally and physically capable of operating equipment for their own use. The
increase in capacity from 6 to 12 adult residents with special needs is expected to generate a less than
significant increase in noise levels.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 jgI
b) Police protection? 0 0 0 jgI
c) Schools? 0 0 0 jgI
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 jgI
roads?
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 jgI
Comments: Compliance with threshold and code requirements (Section XII of this checklist) and
those included in the project description of the Negative Declaration, will ensure that all impacts will
be at a level below significant.
XII.
Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact the
City's Threshold Standards?
o
o
o
jgI
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the City's
Threshold Standards.
a) FirelEMS
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to
calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of
the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is 2 miles away and would be associated with a 5 minute
response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: The Facility meets the requirements put forth by the State Fire Marshall. The fire
clearance will be approved and routed to state and county offices if the facility meets the
requirements.
The fire department will be able to provide an adequate level of emergency service for the proposed
project area without an increase in equipment or personnel.
WPC Fc\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\17IS.94
Page 6
Potentially
Significant
Impa(t
Potentially
Significant
Uole"
Mitigated
La. than
Significant
Implltt
No
lmpa(t
b) Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of
4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7
minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes
or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: The police department will be able to provide an adequate level of service for the
proposed project area.
c) Traffic
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of
1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS
"E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway
ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard.
Comments: The project is expected to generate 36 ADT; 18 ADT over the existing use and 26 ADT
over the zoned use. These volumes do not exceed the City's level-of-service (L.O.S.) "C" design
ADT volume. The primary access roads are adequate to serve the project and traffic mitigation is not
required; impacts are considered to be negligible.
d) Parks/Recreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l,OOO population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: The project proposes increasing the capacity of an existing facility and Park and
Recreation impacts are not expected.
e) Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed
City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary
improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: Existing on-site drainage facilities allow surface flows to Tourmaline Street and Hilltop
Drive. These facilities are adequate to serve the project.
Existing off-site facilities consists of surface flow/curb and gutter flow along Hilltop Drive. These
facilities are adequate to service the project.
WPC F\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
Page 7
Potenlially
Significanl
Impl..:1
PotentiaJly
Signlficanl
Unlel.
Milisaled
Lell than
Signifieant
Impaet
N.
Impad
f) Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: Payment of additional sewerage participation fees will be required due to the change in
use and increase in sewage generation from the parcel.
g) Water
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: The proposed project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial
alterations to the existing water system. Once the fire flow is provide by the Fire Department to the
Sweetwater Authority, the Authority will determine if new water systems are required. The City will
work with the Authority to determine if the existing water facilities are adequate prior to issuance of a
building permit.
XlII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems, or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 181
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 181
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 181
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 181
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 181
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 181
Comments: The proposed street improvements will not generate a need for new systems, or
substantial alteration to the utility systems listed above.
XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the
public or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
o
o
o
181
b) Cause the destruction or modification of a
scenic route?
c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
0 0 0 181
0 0 0 181
Page 8
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNINGISTORED\J718.94
d) Create added light or glare sources that could
increase the level of sky glow in an area or
cause this project to fail to comply with Section
19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
Title 19?
Potentially
PotentiaUy SizaifiUDt' LeQ than
Significant Unlell Signi8c:aat N.
Impact Mitipted Impad Impact
0 0 0 ~
e) Result in an additional amount of spill light?
o
o
~
o
Comments: The proposed project will not obstruct a scenic route or produce an additional amount of
spill light
XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or 0 0 0 ~
the destruction or a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 ~
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object?
c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 181
physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 181
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 ~
EIR as an area of high potential for
archeological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is located in an older developed central residential area of the City
and is not expected to impact cultural resources.
XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the
proposal result in the alteration of or the
destruction of paleontological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is an older central residential area of the City and is not expected
to impact paleontological resources.
o
o
o
~
XVIl. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 181
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 181
c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 ~
plans or programs?
Comments: The proposed project involves increased capacity to an existing facility and will not
interfere with recreational opportunities.
Page 9
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\STOREDlI718,94
Potentially
Potentilllly Siguificllnt LeS! than
SignifiuDt Vnle.. Significant N.
Impact Mitigllted Impact Impact
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for
mandatory findings of significance. If an EIR is
needed, this section should be completed.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 181
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods or
California history or prehistory?
Comments: Section E. of Negative Declaration
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 181
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
Comments: Section E. of Negative Declaration
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 181
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
Comments: Section E. of Negative Declaration
d) Does the project have environmental effect 0 0 0 181
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments: Section E. of Negative Declaration
Page 10
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNINGISTORED\!7I8.94
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
D Land Use and Planning D Transportation/Circulation D Public Services
D Population and Housing D Biological Resources D Utilities and Service Systems
D Geophysical D Energy and Mineral Resources D Aesthetics
D Water D Hazards D Cultural Resources
D Air Quality D Noise D Recreation
D Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and J8
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I fmd that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, D
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an D
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least D
one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
/JJz:J- Cj ,/?'YG
Date ./
Environme Review Coordinator
City of Ch a Vista
Page 11
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\STORED\1718.94
APPENDIX III
CITY DATA SHEET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
I.
Current Zoning on site: R-I
North
South
East
West
R-I
I-L
R-I
R-I
Does the project conform to the current zoning? Yes
11. General Plan land use designation on site: low-medium residential
North low-medium residential
South Industrial-Research & Limited Manufacturing
East low-medium residential
West low-medium residential
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? Yes.
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated?
No.
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? No.
(If yes, descTibe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the
route).
111. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: N/ A
School
CaDacitv
Enrollment
Units
Proposed
Generating
Factors
Students
Generated
From Proiect
Elementary
Junior High
Senior High
.30
.29
.10
IV. Remarks: The proiect site is residential. however. the proiect proposal is to increase the capacity
of an existing residence and does not propose additional SQuare footage.
~
1 . /175
,/
lanning or Representativ$'
.:--~
,
(-3-"~
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
December 29. 1994
Ken Larson, Building ~ Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec ~ EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks ~ Recr9ation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (capt, Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev, only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S, District, !rom Silva (IS ~ EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Hartin Hiller, Project !rracking Log (route form only)
Other
.../ l ~',~
"'.1".;;) r,
<J i.9:!~
.....,J
!l'O :
",>
"L.!: ""
'1 ~ 'I. .., ' '1
'/',,1..:4
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJEC'1': Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-18/FA-ML.JDO-153 J
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO J
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP J
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR--1
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DO- J
The Project consists of: Residential Care Facility For i2 people
. (Increasin9 capacity of an existing facility)
Location:
8 Tourmaline Street
Please review the document and forward to .. any cO.lUll8nt. you bave
by 1/6/Q5 , ~
Comments: ~/~ ,PI""!J-e'; ~;;'.. .""."", ~ "_/<#It"r .~ 17M $",,~.-r tV".,I1l 11M,;" ~;"
~iI,Ii-. Dlsn-;cr'
-~~ ~ft~
NDte..,
DATE:
i'8.
F,;JolY!;,
~Rg_l.ll
101-
COfre( \'-;1 flD.(\? C).(e a.++a,..Led-Q.S
Wt\\ ().s ycu-r 'f(e, V I 0'05 Co, " m€f\.+s
ROUTING FORM
April 20, 1995
/:Pt( ')
..... 1
79 "',^
- J"j
I"
- i.../,
I \ i ~'J I \
'....
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst city Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Matin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
~
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS-95-18/FA-667 /DQ153 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-____/FB-____/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-____/FB-____/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-____ERR-____)
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
The Project consists of: Residential Care Facility for 12
people (increasing capaci ty of an
existing facility)
Location:
8 Tourmaline Street, Chula vista
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by May 4. 1995.
Co~v.."-1A't5 I~V>\~''''-'L~'' ~t>.",,,-
4-,J.4-<fS
l~ 'f.5oS.$
.
DATE:
-fie-:'
Fr" m 8
- c
I () ()
ntCJN.
ROUTING FORM
December 29. 1994
Ken Larson, Building 6 Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst city Attorney (Draft Beg Dec Ii EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks I< Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt, Zoll)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union B.S. District, ~om Silva (IS I< EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project ~racking Log (route form only)
Other
Douq Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-18/FA-~/DO-153 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR--1
Review of Draft Beg Dec (IS-' /FA- /DQ- )
~he Project consists of: Residential Care Facility For 12 people
(Increasing capacity of an existing facility)
Location:
8 Tourmaline Street
Please review the document and forward to .. any coJlll/lents you have
by 1/6/95 . '
Comments: Facility meets the requirements set forth by the State Fire ~larshal.
The fire clearance will be approved and routed to state and county offices if the
facility meets the requirements set by the City of Chula Vista Planning Department.
Horsfall
Case No. Is'i5/?
FIRE DEPARTMENT
A. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? &!! what is the Fire Depanment's estimated
reaction time? two mi I es. five minutes.
B. Will the Fire Depanment be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for the
proposed facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? Yes
C. Remarks
r--- .-- /':
I -' .( <,.
'- (, r: ~<.<., ~'" L
Captain E.
~")f~"{
Horsfal'1
1/3/95
Date
Fire Marshal
Paae6
WPCl',~CJ\S'I'OR.ID'J022.93 (JIol, 1021.93) (Ref. 1020.93)
No\-€.
cora. c...kd -:p\Q,n? o.:++-o..c.ned ~ \ Y5-615
~\\ a.~ you'I' 1'r-e.v 'S CoVY\('(\e,Y\t-"S ~rf2.EV(SE:D
ROUTING FORM
DATE:
2/
April~, 1995
F~: :Nfi
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Matin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
-ro: EReI'r:
Barbara Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS-95-18/FA-667 /DQ153 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-_)
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
The Project consists of: Residential Care Facili ty for 12
people (increasing capacity of an
existing facility)
Location:
8 Tourmaline Street, Chula vista
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by Mav 4. 1995.
C.~MENT5 D.A-r-E:D ..TA-tJ()~>' 6, {cyqs A1<F 9rrt-<- .4Wr-ICAB'-E 9<CEPr ~ /ffE'-
C'.L:>MM~T VN!)~/Z. 'T7-f-E "~rzx:s" S~cN ON ~':;E- 5" ~'2I::'fI.J9 77fE NUHI3ER..
OF 13E:Pf2bCM.5. C-HM{;E. "NfNE(Cf)G<'(S-rING 8EJ:>r<c:uvts" T?> "SE (-,\
'BED~~f'/~CL V~ '7.Jf'=K(~(^,..
L' (ENr 13ED~S ~ M.<WM~$ 'Bt=~). ~
YS-b/5
ROUTING FORM
1 -J
,:..;
DATE:
:TM>J.~'f (0) Iq<q5"
BeeeffiBsr 29, 199q
/,'
r~:
JPC":
Ken Larson, Building ~ Housing
John Lippi~~, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daous~, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec ~ EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (Capt, %011)
community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennet~, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draf~ EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Hiller, Projec~ Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
71':
~:
DOUQ Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 95-l8/FA-ML./DO-153 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP I
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR--l
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DO- I
The Project consists of: Residential Care Facility For 12 people
(Increasing capacity of an existing facility)
Location:
8 Tourmaline Street
Please revie", the document and forward to .. any C'o.lUll8nts you bave
by 1/6/95 '
Comments:
Y5-~/5
Case No.1:~..q<;, -fA
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS
ENGI!'\'EERI!\G DIVISION
I. Drainage
A. Is the project site within a flood plain? AJD.
H so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary. ~4.
B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? <:;{ J~r",'~ R ~
(D -rbU~LI/IJ~ t::n72.EEr.4-IJr> I-IILL'T?':P "iUVF
C. Me they adequate to serve the project? YE~_
H not, please explain briefly. JJ fA
t
D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? ~uJ?=<r":
t:=U71./ / C-/J/JA A-N't:> '/';uTT7012. t:=LJ':tW A~~ #1c.L'TDP DfZ.NE .
,
E. Me they adequate to serve the project? YE4.
H not, please explain briefly. N.,64.
II. Transportation
A. What roads provide primary access to the project? I-!rU-77P "DrtZ/r/E:.
B. What is the estimated number of one.way auto nips to be generated by the project (per day)?
:3(0 A-:t:>r" (IA AZff'" 6Vl5e.. EXI!5-rJfo.JL5i. u~e: A-AIT"> .2.ih A-r>r ;,,>VF.iZ
ZnNFh 059-
C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T.) volumes on the primary access roads before and
after project completion?
Street Name Before After
1+(I..L-n:::>'P DfVII1= ,)t, ff) 51O.~
Do any of these volumes exceed the City's Level-of-Service (L.O.S.) "C" design ADT
volume? H yes, please specify. 1JD.
WPC,P~IOMEIPlANN!NGlST0REIJ\1021.93 (Rei, 1021.93) (Rd, 102M3)
Page 2
YS-0(~
Case No. TSJI5-/8
If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly.
^>4.
. D, Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? y€s.
If not, please explain briefly. ~
E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at intersections adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site? Nt').
If so, id~ntify: Location N ~
Cumulative L.O.S. ^>~
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). If yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required. In this case the rIA will
have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that
all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-significance.
Yes X No
The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required.
G. Is traffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of
the proposed project? Yes X No
If yes, please describe. ~
H. Is the project consistent with the criteria established in the City's Transponation Phasing Plan,
General Plan Traffic Element, and all other pertinent traffic studies? Please reference any
other traffic impact studies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the proposed
project. YEC;
I.
J.
Is a traffic study required?
Is there any dedication required? ND.
If so, please specify. ^{/-I.- .
Yes
x
No
WpcoF,\IIOMlN'UNNlNGIS1'ORED\J022.93 ()Id. 1021.93) {Rd. 1020.93)
Page 3
Ys-~(~
Case No. rS4S-Ip.
K. Is there any street widening required? No.
If so, please specify. .!1M .
.
L. Are there any other street improvements required? t-Lo.
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary improvements.
""fA.
.
M. Will the project and related public improvements provide satisfactory traffic service for
existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions? (Please provide a brief
explanation). E:,((~-rl..!tr ~'V'~.; .
r:1J-r'lJU ~YF-."'" .
m.
Soils I-I/~. Mo /o.1f;w' ~fo,.lS1r4x....nOlJ. IS -P/ZoftJ~eD.
A. AIe there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site?
B. If yes, specify these conditions.
C. Is a Soils Repon necessary?
IV. Land Fonn
A. What is the averag~ slope of the site? 2. %
B. What is the maximum~slope of the site?.5Z>'1. (Srt>E ~\.OPF-S, F-Xt'..... . .t>IM6.
~IN.(/.!G kI~""')
V. Noise
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that
a noise analysis be required of the applicant? ~.
VI. Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day?
Solid 70 /...5S/DAv' (30l..A~/~VhVI5'I2..... ,:;,r,cntJr. /'<;",,- At4b l!5/'''S/OIIY''''-''' ~Ebt.JSE'
.u . . . /..:'-. '''0+1$ I~ 2"70 "",~,.1::I.\y c>VEa, 5o<.'$r'N& USE: Aut> 3bs"'"
"..... LiquId ~3ol'..., ,...,]c'/D4Y ~. 3A. ~ 'fl I!t,AIJ -&l~..r~" ^~.oI:Z. Z'ba.1~ ,I rc;.-= .
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site?
~ " "n
~ Vc..p lIJ -r?;)1.JJb.A.~..J~ 91 -~~ . WJ..hc.f.4 /")IJ~t..tJ5. TZ> ~f ~ Vc.p
.
lkl 1.-1-( f-L".~"P t:IQ..( vIE .
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? (If no, please explain) YES.
~ <S>E ""'AGE r..EAIEfZA'n~ ~ (.JP~
WPC,F,~MNLANNING\STORE!N022.93 <Jld. 1021.93) (Ref. 1020.93)
WA~ (~E r2.~r".,fZX>~-r1Ac..U-ED).
Page 4
Ys-br 5'
Case No.:cs-q$-(A
VD. National Pol!utant Discharge Elimination Svstem (NPDES) Stormwater Reauirements
Will the applicant be required to me a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Control Board
for coverage under an NPDES Stormwater Pennit? MD.
H yes, specify which NPDES pennit(s) and explain why an NPDES pennit is required. N,/.A .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project?
Yes X No
Additional comments NONr=.
VD. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts, mitigation measures. or other
issues.(])i1+E r:-1.<X>12.. PLA-.! <;<1-" ,~h P..V -rHF AFP.....I~.,. SJ..(d'~ I-J,IJE....(q)
r;~ IS.,..,JoJ&. &~bP-. ,,< 8cJT 7"'J.fE t:=LDnL ~/IMtplf2h~r;,JJ'" 'PLA+J ~(JAA.t ,.,..,..-et;::>
.
-rb i1-IE l$Ult...'1:>flJ6;,..kJr> u",uStiV.1O 1:>~I2rME"'r /1.1 MA~# 1"1"1<1 s~w.. OIJf...Y RVE(s)
9E~S(2:) PAYM~( ()F At>"OrTlO<<.rAt.- c::;&-""J_.~~ PlAdl::r1t:.JA4rr~ ~E.S
WILL. 9t:: f7":-? JfiJ~b DuE. 7b ~ C~/C.E IAI {JSE. *'-It'> fNc./h=A<F 1k.1
~A~ r.F:A.J~~.PrTf!;#o./ Fi2DM 'TFfE. 'P;IrrJ"f'C/'-.
IA/f~
.
City
Date
PageS
WPC,}','HOMElPLANNlNG\S'1'ORIDJ022.93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.93)
<
....
00 en ~
....::>
0 r./)......
< ...<r./)
0 :I:........
>-< r./)>-<
Z a:: z
>-< C) ::>
>-g: 0
0
It .co
- 00",
H~ 0 It'>
M< .
~~ <0
N W
0< N
...
Z-' w .or./)
..0 -'
H~ 00 <a::
C)C)..CD....
x
:>-C)(!)a::
>-~ ....-':I:a::0
>-< < C)::> 0
I-~ C)C)a::C)
::> 0
H r./)
> z
H z
0
I-"j- C)
0 r./)
Ob 0 r./)
. 0
<~ CD 0 a::
a:: C)
N ~
I ..It'>
1t8 ....M....
r./)M....O
W~ 1t'>...C)
-'100
I a:: -,~o>
...........Q.w
O~ CDO>Wa::
~o
I-~ 0>
U)Z
~~ <
Os ....C)
00
C)
C) W
< z<
.......
-'00
<>-<
x>
a::
::><
0-'
....::>
:I:
coC)
WOIt'>OIt'>OOOOOOO~OIt'>
c)OMOCOO~O~O"j-Oooco
Z . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<O"j-ooOO>OO>ocoo~oo
-' 0> 0> co co It'> It'> "j-
<
CD
-J&l)&t)Lt)&t)OOOCOO.......-IOLt)
<('I')C"')CXlCO..-.........-..Oococo
.-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
O"j-"j-OOO>O>O>O>COCO~~OO
....0>0>0> 0> CO CO co COIt'>It'>It'>It'>"j-"j-
Q.OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
woooooooooooooo
o . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000000
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
a::00000000000000
t-I . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
LL.OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
a::00000000000001t'>
WO"j-O"j-O"j-O"j-O~O~OO
:s . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
UJOMOMOMOMOMOMOIt'>
en M M C"') C"') (W) ('I') N
a::01t'>01t'>0000000~00
wOO>O"j-O....O....ooocooco
~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
<000....01t'>01t'>01t'>0....01t'>
:k CD &t) Lt) Il) N .- ....
00
z
0 0 co .... ....
C) M N N N co M It'>
0
< .... .... 0> N It) .... ~
UJ ('oj 0> co "j- ~ 0 0
a:: It'> "j- ~ "j- ~ ~ ~
ocn-J('t)....J.......Jal1-1('t)...JM...JIl)-I
OON-'"j--'N-,,,,-'CO-'N-''''-'
w...........................,.M...,........t-I.t-I
OQ.CDQ.CDQ.CDQ.CDQ.CDQ.CDQ.CD
~"j-~~"j-"'~~"j-"j-~"j-MM
0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>0>
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
CCIl)I.t)OCCcnCD"fO-,....a)Q)co
WONOMONONOOONON
.... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
CN_Ocna:>,....U)Il)....C\I-N-
0___000000000--
yc;-(ors
T<; - 15 -(8
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D.
SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD
PAMELA B. SMITH
MIKE A. SPEYRER
SUPERINTENDENT
UBIA S. GI~ Ph.D.
"
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619 425-9600
EACH CHILD IS AN INDMDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
January 6, 1995
Mr. Doug Reid
Environmental Section
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: IS-95-18/ FA-667/ DQ -153
Residential Care Facility for 12 People /8 Tourmaline Street
Dear Mr. Reid:
This is to advise you that the project proposed for 8 Tourmaline Street is within
the Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from
Kindergarten through Grade 6. The subject project is located in the Rohr School
attendance area
District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 3 - 4 percent over the past
several years, and this is projected to continue. Permanent capacity has been
exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being
utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District also buses
students outside their attendance areas, both to accommodate growth and assist
in achieving ethnic balance.
State law currently provides for a developer fee of $1.72 per square foot of
assessable area to assist in financing facilities needed to serve growth. The fee
is split between the two school districts with our District receiving
$ . 76/sq. ft. and Sweetwater Union High School District receiving $.96/sq. ft.
This fee is assessed for new residential construction and additions/remodels of
over 500 square feet. Since this project is increasing capacity of an existing
facility, fees will only be charged on new square footage.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
Mt-~~
Kate Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KS:dp
feexixre
NDk.:
DATE:
~
.f(lP
~
c.o,,("€Lkd ,?\Qn~ 0 a44a.c.\ied 0.5
wet. ...-I.':> you ( ~re:Jltl0~ c.c oY'\et\tSo
ROUTING FORM
RECEIVED
APR 201995
CITY OF CHeer.
BUILDING & HOUSING DE
r.
April 20, 1995
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Current Planning
Duane Bazze1, Advance Planning
Bob sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
chu1a vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Matin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Other
Barbara Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS-95-1B/FA-667 /DQ153 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-____)
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
The Project consists of:
Residential Care Facility for 12
people (increasing capaci ty of an
existing facility)
Location:
B Tourmaline Street, Chu1a vista
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by Mav 4. 1995.
Bwh...,,- )
12. /J ,j.-,...r ;2-"-fij-1 ~ ./( !I-&j I <~:( ...e~~7
/JI:t{fl..Vl""- (N'"<. .JL../.. < /ZN.
~ ~....d, i ;j2/rr
<
';WEETWATER AUTHOR!"'.
5D5 GARRETT A VENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHU~A VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91912-2328
(619) 42D-,413
FAX (619) 425-7469
GOVERNING BOARD
January 20, 1995
I, '~"
I..'~/' __ f'--
.~ J 1('-
"
BUD POCKUNGTON. CHAIRMAN
GEORGE H. WATERS, VICE CHAIRMAN
SUE JARRETT
EDWIN J STEELE
MARGARET A WELSH
JAMES 5 WOLNIEWICZ
CARY F_ WRIGHT
WANDA AVERY
TREASURER
ClAN J REEVES
SECRETARY-ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE
Mr. Douglas Reid
city of Chula vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY
PROPOSED EXPANSION OF RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CASE NO: IS-95-1S
SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 1995
Dear Mr. Reid:
This letter is in response to your Notice of Initial Study for the
subject project within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There
is a S-inch water main located on the east side of Hilltop Drive
adjacent to the proposed development. Our records indicate that
there is one water service to this property. Enclosed is a copy of
1/4 SEC. 23-B map which shows the existing water facilities.
At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing
system to provide fire protection for this project. As plans
develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the
Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow
requirements. Based on this requirement, this project may result
in the need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the
existing water system . The Authority recommends that your Agency
work with ours to determine if the existing water facilities are
adequate to meet the added demands prior to issuing a building
permit.
If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters
into an agreement for water facility improvements with the
Authority, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from
a maximum of 76 p.s.i. to a minimum of 61 p.s.i.
A Public Agency,
Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
Mr. Douglas Reid
city of Chula vista
Planning Department
Subject: WATER AVAILABILITY
PROPOSED EXPANSION OF RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CASE NO: IS-95-18
January 20, 1995
page two
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at
420-1413, ext. 639.
Very truly yours,
S~..EETWATE.R. AUTHORITY
:4 J~
/'~. smi~[1
l/,Chi:f ~ngineer
enclosure:
photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 23-B map
pc: Russ Collins, Sweetwater Authority
Trinity Adult Residential Care
8 Tourmaline street
Chula Vista, CA 91911
\
,
\
.
I . ~
1&3 ! ~
__ . ~"" sa.cs . ~"1
'i~'.ij":'~~~~-' -.; '~Mt~~,!;T l ::5--Z: l ::;.,~~:
.7<> ".~ '::~.'.o_ ;~ . 29456 ... <( ~ --
..,., ~Ci."~ "7, .. ..a............"'"'9A .J"..~~ I ' "'-'=-
"""0 7~ ,. . ... ~ I~I f:a~I_ <<) 2'467 ""''14 .H14
Ij 8 I ~ 0') ~....." ~l-,O"..'- I "W.'/I~. .... .~~ "99 Q u.i <!_- '"
~ i' <I~ ~ .~ou ".~ )I -~. .. ,en' , '~-""
~ 41' ~ "",,,,,.. II ~ W I 'Jot" 0 ~ ~:~ /
_ ... '= >0 00 "00..,1--'- ,...-" t ............._:2 · ........0".11
l' _ - 'J~ ~.......,., .. ... ~ ..~ LJ... ; _dO t ~.'" . :
t~ ~ f""""'K '" , "".,~ ,n ,.. UJ 10.'
~;; iJC ~~~ J . 141 140 ~OO1f _. ","J -=.; 'It ~AUM4 _," l
t ~ G "11!i.- .I!!. <;.L ~ 2tJJtM!1 ""'''''2 ~ ~~
Ii.:. --;., i~ NIT. NO. '~7 i OJ'? -- - ; ,0".
"'71 vv.O-'!t7e.3 lot. '0 ! 3'0.'. _! I _.... - H ~ ~ ,. Lr. Itt ~ L.2~.
~rr" ......v="'. ~ ","'300 i ''''' ~~ g : .... 'i I~ ~ ~ I. .
" ... ~ 17_. '." ~ ~ 12 O. ,Q .,111-
l '" . 6' H I 1.ot"'J~,
~ ~~ ~;-;.;, ~~ ',... :.... X '.Li,; ;, ~ IIZ?' ~ m.H: '''''OM'''. J~::
I ~~( ...,. .7'A...... ; HHI1 ~ ~<12 <> 91 .t .29~""
. .. 1'7' .'/'- ~/JA~ ~ 29607 ,~.
522 = ~cr" 'flJ,^' 11.. . 0 ~'\t. ~ :z.,~o". t <4'/$
0\ ,.... ..... 8- ~ .1_-- ." "" 1! 196$/
J" ,." I. - . i .
MA 8 'AP !~0599. .0... -... ~ ..116 H"" 86 t,.......... :f. ,N
...... no.a:... ,.. _,,'''0"/ ,..~ ..~~ ~'. ~ T< UFMtlL ItJF" =.;
. :...J '~/I' S..,-,~A ~'JfL"'P~ '"
-! (1// ~ ~ ~ ~ ~T." It ~ "-
..... If- ~~~. t ~. ~. ~ ~ I"" ~\'"
\'
\......... ..,.. ............ 'NIl .......
... ..........,. ........,. .......
. .ccouwr.. HI'Y. _or .....,., .
.................,
'@?.IEC.T SIT1)
~:~~:~79Z
w.o. A120t.1
I''''
,
.
, .
~ ...
. -
,
~ ~'I""
,
, Z5k/92
.~ ....
l t~.....~.~.,
Ml-,.,raHIJ
~~.~~
~
~\
,
J
i--
~=.'.'<
I .~.,
I ' , 11-
" ....4' J ~
. .7c#'! rJ
'. ~.
111
.. 0-1
Ii
N
.
a
..
11714
..
......
'.'.N.'n
..0.&.116.4
z
~
.J
...
J>
LU
-'
<1:
U
en
.....'0"'.
to
. N
~i"~
:~ ~d
. o. .
12"';'.
ET
,;
~
. a
~.S
. __....""H
-~~~
:=:f~
.
~
o
.
.
a
N
~
;
In. III
(&.'1;ffo
...."
1.'.0.
IO..~.' aiD.
-
51? '15
1O......n
_.............,---'- rn:.; .-...:...".. ~'OTt~
:r ~+~,. M g
f~~o .1I~O.*.O..
.<: N>
........ N ro
~.,. .5C-o"'t~
mi~~N ~ r~C~~~E
~~ . -- C),~
; .~::: 0 0 .D. .-I .9
, a' " ".," .....
~ ~A},,?- u) (j'J
011 .. -- t: ::j >-
(J 1....; CJ 1..'; (0 ro
. , \' l' = ""0
.J . I> ("J tlD
'\ &"~""GCI ._ 1'''' c:
--, U . ~
-, U ...."
.19 eeio2o'.'~.o-g
i' . .'c':::;3=
~ nltJ ,.p:~'''~~ ~
~z.' .'.,.'::> 0-.2:.
~ .
~^ i
,"I.t.
....y. 11
a~ ..
.. .
aa D
'0 ..
;:c If)
~d
"2-
~ "
;:: ~
N N
,;
~.
".
T
~
L..-
I.
..,... ....... ....,.. ". .......
U. ...........,. ".......,. .......
. .CCOWITMII ..n. ,.-, .....,..1
II
,
IS
u
.~.
//1
r
~
~
~
+
24-A
~
It
~
Q
~
I
City of Chula Vista
Application Fonn
1-95-/<23
For Office U
Case No. IS-
'Dpst. Amnt.
Receipt No.
Date Rec'd. -2/"
Accepterl by TX:iffi
Project No. FA- Z; 7
Dpst. No. DO- /53
CJP No.
Related Qise Ni
Pee. -'IS -.;? -
APPLICATION CANNO', E ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
. PLAN IS FOLDED TO m INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
INITIAL STUDY
A.
BACKGROUND
1.
2.
3.
Project Title \:~I~I\~ ~A,)\~ \:4>1)\(\"'"[';\,(',0 (",9
Project Location (Street address or description)
'5 T OL>IZ~/\ />. \.0 \.. e ';"\\i:<:<"1
e..r\~LA VISTA C/. cW1l\
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. "23 2qD '7000
Brief Project Description \b/\"iP\\-\\o.\ en ,0 ~v ,I",~ ~c, \~ \>(' "1( '12.
ll"" r'<-C\J>'''''':J''''\..o ''-'''I,O( d" (' I ('1.-"" 01'" ,~',\' Cj' 9 "''' I, II \ )
j \j '\ \
4. Name of Applicant ...~\",\(;>"I) M vew, RO<;A
Address 'fS \o.'~M."l.INE' Fax# Phone ((.,1'\) "+"n-1343
City C:.f-ILIl.l>. VISIA State CA. Zip G\I'!II
5. Name of Preparer/Agent A.L ktt] f)1..J1>fZ-{ tv 0
Address f> J2'clf2.,MI4C- ((0(0 Fax# Phone 4tIP-ls..q5
City ~,+hw14- 1ft! fA State C{.... Zip.q \ q 1/
Relation to Applicant
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents requirerl by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
Rezone/Prezone
_ Grading Pennit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Pennit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative Sub<!. Map
_ Rerlevelopment Agency OPA
_ Rerlevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
Specific Plan
7"" Conditional Use Pennit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
Other Pennit
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from
to
b.
Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
Arch. Elevations _ Hydrological Study
= Landscape Plans _ Biological Study
_ Tentative Sub<!. Map _ Archaeological Study
_ Improvement Plans Noise Assessment
_ Soils Report = Other Agency Pennit
_ Geotechnical Report Other
_ Grading Plan
_ Parcel Map
Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic Impact Report
Hazardous Waste Assessment
WPCl':\HOMEll'LANNING\ITORE!JoI021.A.93 (Rd. I02D.93) (Rer. 1022.93)
Page 1
'7: Indicate other aL .cations for pellTlits or approvals that a. .>eing submitted at this time.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
_ Rezonetprezone
_ Grading Pennit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Pennit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative SuM Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
Specific Plan
/ Conditional Use Pennit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
Other Pennit
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
Land Area: square footage R?CJCJ if or acreage
If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose.
I.
a.
b. Does the project involve the cons.truction of new buildings, or will existing structure be
utilized? t-J ()
Complete this section if project is residential or mixed use.
a. Type of development: ? Single Family _ Two Family _ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominiwn ~c~~"'" '0/'''-
Total number of structures l) [Jt=
Maximum height of structures t"I"'''' ..S -\ 0" ~ -
Number of Units: I bedroom _ J
2 bedroom
3 bedroom
4 bedroom
Total Units
Gross density (DU/total acres) "<-,,, n
Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
Estimated project population
Estimated sale or rental price range
Square footage of structure
Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 'N'. '\)(') ,\, ,~c~ .-
Percent of site in road and paved surface
!
b.
(0
c,
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
1.
J.
k.
I.
';-eI) \c:l-e,,\\c-J: ('CU\C
Complete litis section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use.
a. Type(s) of land use
b.
1'J_~_L.. _c ___,......___~(_\
.! .!''':-.!cH1. ......1 ~~ !..!....v..u._-~\~i
f1'00f aI6a
c. Type of construction used in the structure
Page 2
WPC,F,\HQME\Pl.ANNING\ST0RIDJ021.A.93 (RoI. 1020.93) (R,I. 1022.93)
d. Describe .ajor access points to the structures and ,..~ orientation to adjoining properties
and streets ~M ,OVI,;.IUALING 9r -\c.'-"I'tvA\,,,o ,,;\,,,,,..,\
e.
f.
Number of on-site parking spaces provided 0
Estimated number of employees per shift d-
Number of shifts --..3 Total
Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
':":~~ o-\-'-oc" '" cJ
g.
Estimated number of deliveries per day 10 t}J~ Ot-</1J61Z..
Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate 0 -..J "3 1775 ,
P ~ r1.:(;f) IN ~ (Dt?t.J c&-
J. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildjngs
L-I Vr;:::
FOOl)
><
h.
1.
k.
1.
Hours of operation
Type of exterior lighting
~.t:r-
~Gt> CK9F/
x
;4, If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section.
a. Type of project
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f, Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g, Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
1. Will the project be required to obtain a pennit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)?
, ,~
f.vij
Page 3
WPCP,'HOME\Pl.ANNlNGISTOREI:I\J021-A.93 (Rd. 1020.93) (Ref. 1022.93)
2. Is any type of g ing or excavation of the property antic _ 1ed? 100
If yes, complete the following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the: Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
A verage depth of fill
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.)
if.!' k,L..L.. \+e.'t'it-1Z
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres)
,,\ DAf 'f.-
5. If the project will result in any empJoyment opportunities describe the nature and type of these
jobs. 2. f':::'Il$7//JC, ",>mpr- ;vtUV1~
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within
the project site? ~O
7. How many estimated automobile trips. per day, will be generated by the project? jl.JO
,ApP; T/P/.Nl L ,I1UllJIE4C5/LlT 1/2..-/P...5
8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of
access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following:
new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
tJo
/ fU~f/&114AJr
Page 4
WPC:E'HOMIN'1....NNlNG\5TOREI1\1021.A.93 (Ref. I02D.93) (R.r. 1022.93)
D. DESCRIPTION OF E?-< . iRONMENTAL SETIING
1. Geology
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? ('J 0
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils report on the project site been made? f-.lO
(If yes, please attach)
2.
Hvdrologv
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site?
(If yes, explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table?
MOr/f3-
I.J / A-
/
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
;.JOAJ G-
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply,
,.-.,
lake, reservoir or bay: Iv' V
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? " (,)
e.
Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location.
IV 0;.) ti-
3. Noise
a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
jJ N) e-
b. Will noise from the project impact ariy sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? ,J / fr-
.
4. Biology
a.
d.
Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation?
Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes No............. (Please attach a copy.)
Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter. and
species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project.
JJO
pD
b.
c.
'3 et3' "7/ Tl? PLA- tV
WPC,E\IIOMElP\.ANNINGISTORFJ.JoJ021-A.93 (R,r. 1020.93) (R,I. 1022.93) Page S
5: Past Use of the .iI1d
a. Pue there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? NO
b.
Pue there any known paleontological resources?
jJtJ
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
JJD
d.
What was the land previously used for?
f2g-;; f D /!'t...i7J-,A t..--
6.
Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site.
fZ6S1()~tJTl A-l..- c.A-(U? 'fGZ- f:1.-~/ C!V'I-'Vifii?z;T/tVq
yz:> ft?n~c..4-jlJr.?y fi-{)<-(C- ( .
Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property.
North s/Nc<{E M/0/L y ~ CA. 'Y!;;
.
W,4.-~tA<;'f7-
'711Jc;.."f-- ~ IL.-Y
VA-~tJl L-o "
b.
South
East
~vt~
West
7.
Social
a. Pue there any residents on site? YG'S If so, how many? 0
b. Pue there any current employment opportunities on site? JJOAlG
If so, how many and what type? ~~k
8. Please provide any other infonnation which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project.
WPC:E'IIOMEli't.ANNINGSrORElN021.A.93 (RoI. 1020.93) (R,I. 1022.93)
Page 6
E. CERTIFICATION
I, as owner/owner in escrow.
Print name
or
I, consultant or agent.
Print name
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and infonnation herein contained are in all
respects true and correct and that all known infonnation concerning the project and its setting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
~tl9. /"" -1ilp~,----"
Owner/O~ro!V Signature
or
Consultant or Agent Signature
/JP<Jft V
/ /
Date
.If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
WPC:F:IIIOME\PLANNINGISTOREIN021.A.93 (ReI. 1020.93) (R.I. 1021.93)
Page 7
INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENT
Name of ~ant; 'iruV/C>r4{J ,M. DGY.4
Address: TIP rfZ..r"11-Tt-ltJe- "5 r
City: (! 1-.4 vl77P
Name of Authorized Representative (if signalory):
Address:
City
Agreement Date:
Deposit Amount
~0
State ~
Phone
Zip
'1:7[; - (>1 '3
qlfl'
State
PhDne
Zip
This Agreement ("Agreement") between the City of Chula Vis<a, a chartered municipal corporation ("City")
and the forenamed applicant for an Initi:ll Study ("Applicant"), effective as of the Agreemenl Date sel forth above,
is made with reference tD the following facts: .
Wher""" the Applicant has applied 10 Ihe City for an Initial Study of the type aforereferenced ("lniliaJ
Study") which the Cily has required to be obtained as a condition to pennitting the Applicant to develop a parcel
of property; ando
Wher""" the City will incur expenses in ordcr to process said Initial Study through the various departments
and before the various boards and commissions of the City ("Processing Services"): and,
Wherc.'\So Ihe purpose of Ihis agreement is to reimburse the City for all expenses it will incur in eonneclion
with providing the Processing Services;
Now 0 Iherefore, Ihe parties do hereby agreeo in exchange for lhe mutual promises herein cDntained, as
follows:
I. Applicant's Duty 10 Pay.
The Applicant shall pay all of the City's expenses incurred in providing Processing Service related 10
applicant's Initial Study, including all of the City's direct and ovemead costs related thereto. This duty of
the Applicant shall be referred to herein as the "Applicant's Duty to Pay."
A. Applicant's Deposit DUly
As partial perfonnance of the Applicant's Duty 10 Pay, the Applicant shall deposit the amount
aforereferenced ("Deposit").
1. The City shall charge its lawful expenses incurred in providing Processing Services
against the Applicant's Deposit If, after the conclusion of processing the Applicant's
Initial Study, any portion of the Deposit remains, the City shall return said balance to the
Applicant without interest thereon. If, during the processing of the Applicant's Initial
Study, the amount of the Deposil becomes exhausted, or is imminently likely to become
exhausted in the opinion of the Cityo upon notice of same by the City, the Applicant shall
forthwith provide such additional deposit as the Cily shall calculate as reasonably
necessary to continue to provide Processing Services. The duty of tbe Applicant 10
initiaJly deposit and 10 supplement said deposil as herein required shall be known as the
"Applicant's Deposit Duty".
II. City's Duty
The City shall, upon the condition thai the Applicant is not in breach of the Applicant's Duty to Pay Dr the
Applicant's Deposit Duty, use good faith 10 provide processing services in relalion to the Applicant's Initial
Study application.
WPC:F:\JJOME\PL.ANN1NG\STORED\102J-A.93 {Re!, I020.93} (Ref. 1022.93)
PageS
A. The City shall have no liability hereunder to the Applicant for the failure to process the Applicant's
Initial. Study application, or for failure to process the Applicant's Initial Study within the time
frame requested by the Applicant or estimated by the City.
B. By execution of this agreement, the Applicant shall have no righl to direct or olherwise influence
the conduct of the Initial Study for which the applicant has applied. The City shall use its
discretiDn in evaluating the Applicant's Initial Study application without regard to the Applicant's
promise to pay for the Processing Services, or the execution of the Agreement.
III. Remedies
A. Suspension of Processing
In addition to all other rights and remedies which the Cily shall otherwise have at law or equity,
the City has the right to suspend and/or withhold the processing of the Initial Study which is the
subject mailer of ttUs Agreement, as well as the Initial Study which may be the subject maUer of
any other Pennit which Applicant has before the City.
B. Civil Collection
In addition to all other rights and remedies wtUch the City shall otherwise have all law or equityo
the City has the right tD collcct all sums which are or may become due hereunder by civil action,
and upon instituting litigation to collect same, the prevailing party shall be enlitled 10 reasonable
attorney's fees had costs.
IV. Miscellaneous
A. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or penniUed to be given pursuant to this Agreement
must be in writing. All nolices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to
have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mai!o
addressed to such party 0 postage prepaido registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at
the addresses identified adjacent to the signatures of the parties represented.
B. Governing LawNenue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of
California. Any action arising under or relating 10 this Agreement shall be brought only in the
federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City
of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this agreement, and perfonnance
hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
C. Multiple Signatories
II there are multiple signatories to this agreement on behalf of Applicant, each of such signatories
shall be jointly and severally liable for the perfonnance of Applicant's duties herein set fDrth.
D. Signatol)' Authority
The signatory to this agreement hereby wamnts and represents that it is the duly designated agent
for the Applicant and has been duly authorized by the Applicant tD execute this Agreement on
behalf of the Applicant. Signatory shall be personally liable for Applicant's Duty to Pay and
Applicant's Duty to Deposit in the event it has not been authorized to execute ttUs Agreement by
the Applicant.
WPC:F:'HOMNUoNNINGISTOREDII021-A.93 (R,r. 1020.93) (Rd. 1022.93)
Page 9
E. Hold Hannless
Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed offiCers
and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including
withoutlimilalion attorneys' fees) arising oot of processing Applicant's IniliaI Study, except only
for thDse claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, incurred by
the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same
proceed to judgement or noL Further. the Applicant, at its own expense, shall, upon written
request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents,
or employees. Applicant's indemnifcation of the City shall be limited by any prior or subsequent
declaration by the Applicant
F. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedmes.
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim
has fllSt been presented in writing and rued with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the
City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are
incorporated by the reference as if fully set forth herein. and such policies and procedures used by
the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by the City. the Applicant shall meet and
confer in good faith with the City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the tenns of this
Agreement.
Now, thereforeo the parties hereto. having read and understood the terms and conditions of this agreement,
do hereby express their consent to the tenns hereof by selling their hand hereto on the date set fonh adjacent thereto.
Applicant (or authorized representative)
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula ~ta, CA 91910
By: <J/ ~rr (jRJ
Dated: 1-:2 /~.S/ qi
.-e.IWIC>~ (VI. t>(!;-/..-A. gpS,c.-
City
By: {Wt{9~ ~
By:
Dated: 102..1;;1.(,10, y-
WPC,F,IHOMElPLANNlNG'ST0REIN02l.A.93 (Ref. 1020.93) (Rd. 1022.93) Page 10
.
,
,
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matlers which
wilJ require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies.
The following information must be disclosed:
"
1.
List the names of all persons have a fmancial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor,
material supplier.
/
~
7/2; t/J f) 110
f1'7. P8z-./J- (2CJf;.f+' (OW/~
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership. list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in
the partnership.
t-..\tJN'E:
3. If any person identified pursuanl to (I) above is non'profil organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustee of the trust.
""Ol'.!t:;
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards.
Commissions, Commitlees and Council within the past twelve months?
1010
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matler.
~ON;;:-
6. Have you andlor your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council
member in the current or preceding election period? Yes [ ] No [/j If yes, state which Council
memher(s):
Person is defmed as: . My iDdividuaJ. firm. ro-parmcrship, joint venom:, association, social club, frattmaJ organization, COrpon.tiOD. estate,
U'Ust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county. city and county, city. municipality. districc or odler polibcaJ subdivision. or any other group
or combination acting as a unit. .
(N01E: Attach additional pages as ne.cessary)
Date:
(//)..j (1'f
I I
"/tt1 &~ -rt~
Signature of c:ent'Ad\,rlapplicant
_i'll-II" I PAD tv1 0 Dew4- 0}A
Print or type name of contractorlapplicant
Page 11
WPC:Fo \HOMElPl.ANNINGISTORED\I02I.A.91Ref. 1020.93) (R.f. 1022.93)
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
The facility is a non-medical care facility which normally
Is not allowed to provide medical or nursing care. This type of
residential care facility is licenced by the Department of Social
Services.
A. The basic general services rendered to client are the
following:
1) Lodging:
a) single room
b) double room
2) Food Services:
a) 3 nutritious meal daily and snacks
b) special diets if prescribed
3) Laundry services
4) Cleaning the clients room
5) Offering comfortable and suitable bed including fresh linen,
clean bathrooms and toilet with sufficient shampoos, soap,
toothpaste if necessary
6) Making plans, arrange and/or provide for transportation to
medical and dental appointments
7) To planned activity program for clients
8) To notify the clients family and other appropriate person or
agency of client's needs
B. The basic personal services rendered to client are the
following:
1) Continuous observation and supervision
2) Assistance with bathing and personal needs if needed
3) Assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental needs
4) Assistance, as needed, with taking prescribed medications in
accordance with physician's instructions
5) To call paramedics 911 to police in case of emergencies
occur in the facility
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
WORK SCHEDULES
LETICIA R. TUVERA 8:00 AM TO 4:00 PM
(MANAGER)
MONDAY TO FRIDAY
VIRGINIA BAUTISTA 4:30 PM TO 1:00 AM
(DUTY MANAGER)
MONDAY TO FRIDAY
TRINI M. DELA ROSA 1:00 AM TO 8:00 AM
(OWNER/ADMINISTRATOR)
MONDAY TO SUNDAY
RELIEVERS:
URSULA PEDRO
RICHARD BORROMEO
NOTE: IN CASE YOU CANNOT MAKE IT ON YOUR SHIFT LET THE
ADMINISTRATOR KNOW AHEAD OF TIME AT LEAST 3 HOURS ADVANCE.
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
ADMISSION AGREEMENT
All community care facilities are required to have written
admission agreement between the lacility and each client/resident
(or authorized representative) who is received for services
pursuant to applicable sections 01 the California Code of
Regulations, Title 22, Division 6.
1. FACILITY INFORMATION
Trinity Residential Care Home
8 Tourmaline Street
Chula Vista, Ca 91911
Adult Res. Facility
(619) 476-1343
2. BASIC SERVICES
A. The Licensee shall provide the following basic services:
Name of client/resident
SSN (optional)
OOB
1. BASIC GENERAL SERVICES:
a) Lodging: Semi-private room
b) Food Services: three nutritious meals daily
snacks
special diets il required
c) Laundry service
d) Cleaning 01 resident bedroom
e) Comfortable and suitable bed including fresh linens
weekly or more often, when necessary
f) Plan, arrange and/or provide for tranportation to
medical and dental appointments
g) Notification to family or other appropriate
person/agency of resident's needs or requirements
2. BASIC PERSONAL SERVICES:
a) Continuous observation, care and supervision, as
required
b) Assistance with bathing, dressing and other personal
needs, as required
c) Assistance in meeting necessary medical and dental
needs
d) Assistance, as needed, with taking presc~ibed
medications in accordance with physician's instructions
unless prohibited by law
e) Bedside care lor minor temporary illnesses
B. The monthly rate for basic
or the SSI/SSP established
of $
services is $
rate or a government funded rate
.
C. Basic services are paid in advance.
3. OPTIONAL SERVICES
A. The licensee will provide the following optional services
for additional charge:
SERVICE
TIME INTERVALS
RATE
1)
2)
3)
B. Total monthly rate for optional services is .
C. Optional services are paid in advance.
.
4. TOTAL MONTHLY RATE (BASIC A OPTIONAL) IS .
5. EVICTION PROCEDURES: ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE FACILITY
.
A. The licensee/administrator of the facility may, upon thirty
(30) days written notice to the client/resident, evict the
resident for one or more of the following reasons:
1) Nonpayment of the rate for basic services within ten days
of due date.
2) Failure of the resident to comply with state or local law
after receiving written notice of the alleged violation.
3) Failure of the resident to comply with the written general
policies fo the facility which are for the purpose of
making it possible for residents to live toagether.
4) Non-compatibility with other clients/residents.
5) Inability fo the licensee/administrator to meet the
resident's needs. Based upon a reassessment, the facility
is not appropriate for the client and the client has been
given the opportunity to relocate.
6) Change of use of the facility.
B. The licensee/administrator of the facility may, upon
obtaining prior and/or documented telephone approval from
the licensing agency, evict the client/resident upon three
(3) days written notice to quit. The licensing agency may
grant approval for the eviction upon finding of good cause.
C. The licensee/administrator of the facility shall, in
addition to either serving thirty (30) days notice or
seeking approval from the Department and serving three (3)
days notice to the resident, notify or mail a copy of the
notice to quit to the resident's authorized representtative.
A written report of any eviction shall be sent to the
licensing agency within five (5) days.
6. FACILITY VISITING POLICY:
Hours: 9:00 AM - 7:00 PM DAILY
Bringing and giving over-the-counter medications to residents
without the knowledge of the facility staff is prohibited.
1. NOTICE OF RATE CHANGE:
If rates are increased, the resident or authorized
representative will be ~iven at least 30 days written notice
of the change. However, residents whose care is funded at
rates prescribed by government funded programs may have the
basic rate change effective on the operative date of any
change made in that program without notice.
8. MONTHLY RATE:
The total monthly rate set forth in this a~reement will be
prorated on a daily basis upon the client/resident's
admission to the facility during the month.
9. REFUND POLICY:
No refund shall be issued to resident if he decides to leave
the facility any day within the present month.
10. HOLDING RATE FOR BED:
If the resident leaves the facility temporarily; i.e. ~o on
vacation with family or has been admitted to the hospital,
the holding rate for his bed will be the monthly basic
services rate.
11. The facility will not be responsible for any valuables or
personal property brought into the facility unless these
items are delivered to the licensee/administrator for
safeguarding.
12. The resident wil not be destructive of the property of the
facility or that of the other clients.
13. The resident shall provide thirty (30) days notice of intent
to move from the facility unless the resident's physical
condition prevents this being done.
14. The signature ot the Client/Resident or Authorized
Representative below, indicates that he/she has read, or had
read and explained to him/her, the provisions of this
agreement voluntarily.
15. PARTIES TO THIS AGREEMENT:
CLIENT/RESIDENT
DATE
LICENSEE/ADMINISTRATOR
DATE
(
TRINITY ADULT RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME
8 TOURMALINE STREET
CHULA VISTA, CA 91911
OPERATIONAL PROFILE
Trinity Adult Residential Care Home, started as a place to
provide a quality residential care home for individuals between
18 to 69 years old, placed by the county medical services,
with allowable conditions which requires incidental medical
services who are mentally and physically capable of operating
equipment for their own use. We also provide care for persons who
because of forgetfulness or physical limitations need only be
reminded or to be assisted to take prescribed medications,
persons with temporary emotional disturbance resulting from
personal loss or change of living arrangement (their length of
stay in the facility depend on physician's recommendation)
.
We provide these individuals with three square meals a day
and snacks, do their laundry, and take them to recreational
centers, medical/dental appointments, banks, and library.
PETITION AND LETTERS
FROM NEIGHBORS
2 June 1995
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AT 8 TOURMALINE ST.
TO: THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
We wish to go on record with all concerned that our wish is that we are unanimously
opposed to the approval of a conditional use pennit as stated in CASE NO. PCC-95-24 letter
dated May 24, 1995. All residents who learned of this proposal who attended meeting at 6pm on
1 June 1995 at Loma Verde elementary school, chaired by Ann Pedder Pease, Planning
Technician with the Chu1a Vista Planning Department, expressed our strong recommendation of
unanimous denial for this pennit in its present state for the following reasons:
1. We do not wish to have emotional disturbed residents in a residential neighborhood, and
further any permit which does not expressly forbid such residents; would not be considered.
2. Present staffing as stated by the Dela Rosa's would be for 3 people. TI1ese are to be divided
into 3 8hr shifts which means only 1 staff member on duty at a time. The Dela Rosa's stated at
neighborhood meeting that they do have other part time day help, but, the planning commission
reports only these 3. They provide cooking, laundry etc. This is inadequate as 1 person can only
care for 1 person at a time, and leaves no one to care for other 11 in an emergency situation, or
none if cooking or perfonning other chores.
3. Being a residential neighborhood, there are no provisions for staff, resident or visiting persons
parking beyond a normal resident home, probably 4 vehicles maximum.
4. This would have further impact upon trash and possible medical waste if such a permit were
granted.
5. Fire is an additional concern.
6. This is a residential neighborhood with many children as well as many elderly residents and
we would be concerned with anyone requiring medication as to their mental stability.
7. At neighborhood meeting Dela Rosa's stated they did not realize that their application was for
any emotionally disturbed patients, but, were unable to come up with any alternative at meeting.
For the above reasons; we recommend DENIAL OF APPLICATION.
As a resident, I would wish to review any pennit in total as to what it does and what it does not
pennit, prior to any consideration for approval.
FROM:
RESIDENT AT:
,$1 SL5'^'-o.$~
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AT 8 TOURMALINE ST.
TO: THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PETITION: We, The undersigned wish to go on record with all concerned that we are opposed
to the approval of a conditional use permit to establish a residential care facility for 7 to 12
residents at 8 Tourmaline St. as stated in CASE NO. PCC-95-24 and are filing this petition in
support of a DENIAL vote.
ti Print Name
. ;J II
0j 'e/ . 0 De
9L- c: rY~~
/~. / ~!.
, /i (~'-I ,,~(;// I'll) ere.,
/ '
/l!;C(;III), fie; /E/f)
.t),~~ }J K LelSfr~
~ ~ ~~ E l, ~n>Ef2-
. r sn/1 f(9J;J J<vt cr L
----::::,~~c. Q
!:{>..~S(~.. Bn.c:,tc)u..)
Address
J (JJ.!,) 15 ;/~c:X'w
/&;-/ Jtn6 4/5 C. j/,
~ 2' I
..:s '7 /6.a/1...f;--1(~4W / .vi../':-
3'7 / t:)t.J/'Af/l!.I:Z/E sf'
/1 ()~L/ ~LJ 7:!f:..;X./,.4/
d iJ...
/ <, '\.. \:
11 d/"-'L-"77-' &/fd-<-<-.
)G, C; l J B-bt:;
ApF
/I
/i
//
/(,0 J/1DLA-J/E.
lL-oS""Jo J L. r~u-E.. C v.
{':J ,,: '-"""" A ".". '\~ ~v.,
~~lJ "~ 0~0 \.\'--:J'0 <:
_~NNent '0 Mu!
-11-h'{C(i:.......~ uTzL
C':. .
ld 3 J/ffJc I/-ub" c.rJ.
It/{3 -J a.h 1Jz.-e... C r/
AO/'uUU- /.' ~.).e., /61.;-'1 Ta.de /)//(' C ().
'1i ~~#~S-7"-SJ frlJ';:.J:Ju~c.l
jlr:;(c~ / '__~~/ -A- _.d{~.t'_-~.=< ~ /IYJ- .::r~..d~ .Bz.c. . c.j
.// ./ //'/ d' ~ . 1". I/.
_~/,&/2'-.L~.4.aL4<<.D2&:zA:"> .:/ ~<:.g:~4~~.. s'O ...6""j-<..z~~~,li:
,-UN/,tlc! I ArPJsltl'djl O<<l<ll..~ tlnc/k::p .:;o~t.HlL;liH~ (I II
kfl'rj L , Le:s\:,\
ITf't-A...P ~ c...c D, EfJ / rZ,.
APPLICA TION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AT 8 TOURMALINE ST.
TO: THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PETITION: We, The undersigned wish to go on record with all concerned that we are opposed
to the approval of a conditional use permit to establish a residential care facility for 7 to 12
residents at 8 Tounnaline St. as stated in CASE NO. PCC-95-24 and are filing this petition in
support of a DENIAL vote.
Print Name
Signature
Address
1AJ,;/,,qI'f Y. CI./lR-f' 4~~.~
br:...Wtrt.uJe l'i,{' C.i4.k- ~ ')t1,r1d--
/TtJNN.:';9-TR #6; -.!9Q"!,l)/GL/r
~.,..q'" LcUa'/~ ~........~ /,r7~_.J'~
3 CJ ~I/R/7/9"!A./(? St,
1or~p1
;z 7 7C~?>?<>,/.-,;;~ d~.
Nt M NO/?,
)..- /oc/r ri7";; "'./ 5
/-
C{/fi
'1..\...- ~G'
I s=- ()c.u..jl1~ 51 .
'7")
?J
;;t
,; /1 : I
~ucL..7Y!. L0)~) H-tidl CCi."Cl"
I
~,-GII,!~' ~( ,~~C~ 'I, {iL(i~
-y--- /1J1 ..
sdc<vu:'tL !JLI('~ .sQ.VD...~"o'kwoll~/ ~G \6lAV (!?Ct!f':'f cs7
I v (
- p~ ~ 0 ~' ~~ VtJ,~ (r,y\ F, ~;~),ph+.."j, 1{9 IOvnnQ\ I he Sb,
IC'~" ~~ ~/.,,'c/," ....= ,). .Y 7"'~ 2.' -,,_ _
~~~.........'....'~~"~~__":....:,=_~_.,~~~~o~,..l,,,-~,">,,:._~::;; .~.> / L)U~.d/dL </Co S {. .
C"- .'" J ., ~ /"-/'
_~~~st-:t:J~~, ;;'. I~Y:' /~_:G~d_________C,:,.2!'2::C(~'/2:j:!f~::::;::/ vi ~.'_. 70 .'/ ,~S' /'/ d ,': ~'",(,~6-:_~i/:-
. ,~>/ /'
HI a n C~(\j\ ..... [~)q2~J .c,_k_.... _IS.f ,zi.(;::...L~/.J(J-(J.C](l/L......c{.1~~!..Q! JOYJVU1Lc5.tr< ",I
eJ \_
;)0
n L\. Y '" o...le ru.
s ~.
'Jl ~ ,_. (f"-
:J J 1/JM1JIJ..,U--A!./...JI .
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Attn: Ann Pedder Pease
I"
\.'(, of,
, ,
2 June 1995
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR RESIDENTIAL USE AT 8 TOURMALINE ST.
TO: THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
We wish to go on record with all concerned that our wish is that we are unanimously
opposed to the approval of a conditional use permit as stated in CASE NO. PCC-95-24 letter
dated May 24, 1995. All residents who learned of this proposal who attended meeting at 6pm on
1 June 1995 at Lorna Verde elementary school, chaired by Ann Pedder Pease, Planning
Technician with the Chula Vista Plarming Department, expressed our strong recommendation of
unanimous denial for this permit in its present state for the following reasons:
1. We do not wish to have emotional disturbed residents in a residential neighborhood, and
further any permit which does not expressly forbid such residents; would not be considered.
2. Present staffing as stated by the Dela Rosa's would be for 3 people. These are to be divided
into 3 8hr shifts which means only I staff member on duty at a time. The Dela Rosa's stated at
neighborhood meeting that they do have other part time day help, but, the planning commission
reports only these 3. They provide cooking, laundry etc. This is inadequate as 1 person can only
care for I person at a time, and leaves no one to care for other II in an emergency situation, or
none if cooking or performing other chores.
3. Being a residential neighborhood, there are no provisions for staff, resident or visiting persons
parking beyond a normal resident home, probably 4 vehicles maximum.
4. This would have further impact upon trash and possible medical waste if such a permit were
granted.
5. Fire is an additional concern.
6. This is a residential neighborhood with many children as well as many elderly residents and
we would be concerned with anyone requiring medication as to their mental stability.
7. At neighborhood meeting Dela Rosa's stated they did not realize that their application was for
any emotionally disturbed patients, but, were unable to come up with any alternative at meeting.
For the above reasons; we recommend DENIAL OF APPLICATION.
As a resident, I would wish to review any permit in total as to what it does and what it does not
permit, prior to any consideration for approval.
FR?~i Wil~ D.. ~ Gytrude M. Clark 'A. .11 /
~~~.U~ ~~//f1r?f~
RESIDENT AT: 30 Tourmaline St.
Chula Vista, CA 91911-5335
Ph. 420-6488
Salvador & Rosa Rivera
20 Tourmaline St.
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Planning Commission
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Commissioners,
We're sorry we can't be with you for the June 14th meeting regarding the
request submitted by our neighbors to run an adult residential care home. We're in
Fresno right now, but we will be back by the end of Fall.
Please be kind enough to read this letter out loud at the gathering.
We commend Trinidad De La Rosa for trying to help emotionally disturbed
people, but there's no way we're living next to a looney tunes farm. We and our
neighbors have worked too hard maintaining our homes to allow a bunch of mentally
unstable people to lower our property values and to endanger our safety.
If the applicants truly want to do this, they should sell their home and move to a
more suitable area where open spaces would be more beneficial to their guests.
Don't force us into seeking injunctions and other ugly legal maneuvers, let's
keep our area the way it is now: safe; quiet; in general, a great place to live.
Thank you, we hope you do the right thing by rejecting De La Rosa's well intended
request.
--ZereIY,
~ '.
a~ and R~era
20 Tourmaline, St.
(209) 276-7652
MINUTES OF PUBLIC FORUM
PROCEEDINGS OF
PUBLIC FORUM HELD ON JUNE 1, 1995
REGARDING PCC-95-24
The subject of the meeting, held at Lorna Verde Elementary School,
was the application, by Mr. & Mrs. Trinidad Dela Rosa, to expand
the Residential Care Facility at 8 Tourmaline Street, Chula Vista,
from six to twelve residents.
In attendance were Mr. & Mrs.
representing the City of Chula
thirteen neighboring residents.
Dela Rosa, Ann Pedder Pease
Vista Planning Department and
The forum began at 6:00 p.m.
Ann pedder Pease gave a brief introduction, explaining that the
purpose of the meeting was for the applicant and planning staff to
be available to answer neighbors' questions and for planning staff
to note neighbors' comments. She explained the Conditional Use
Permit process and why it was necessary in this case. She then
turned the meeting over to Mr. & Mrs. Dela Rosa, inviting them to
make a verbal presentation.
Mr. Dela Rosa introduced his wife and himself, indicated that they
had been operating a residential care facility for six elderly
residents for some time and then asked if there were any questions.
The first question, from a neighbor, was about the level of
supervision. She expressed concern that there would be only one
staff person at a time on duty for twelve residents and then
described problems that had occurred in the past with just six
residents. Mrs. Dela Rosa stated that the staff-to-resident ratio
was determined by Community Care Licensing and that her facility
met their requirements. The neighbor further indicated that,
because of the number of children in the neighborhood, she worried
that emotionally disturbed residents would be a threat to the
children if they weren't adequately supervised.
Mr. Dela Rosa stated that he took exception to the term
"emotionally disturbed", since that did not accurately describe the
residents. Ann pedder Pease pointed out to him that the term was
used in the Operational Profile which accompanied the application,
and suggested she read that statement. Following the reading, Mr.
Dela Rosa stated that he disagreed with it, although Mrs. Dela Rosa
indicated that she had written it. When asked to describe the
residents, Mr. Dela Rosa stated that they would be "ambulatory",
but with no emotional problems.
One of the neighbors questioned Mr. Dela Rosa further about the
types of problems the residents might have, and whether they might
be physically disabled. Mrs. Dela Rosa indicated that they would
not care for physically disabled or convalescing residents, and Mr.
Dela Rosa said he was not sure what problems they had, but he was
sure they were not emotional problems.
June 1, 1995
-2-
PCC-95-24
He was then asked why he did not simply expand the facility to care
for up to twelve elderly residents, rather than changing to a
different category of resident. Ann pedder Pease stated that a
Conditional Use Permit would still be necessary, and Mr. Dela Rosa
stated that he thought some changes to the facility, such as a fire
sprinkler system, might be necessary and he did not think they
could afford it.
All of the neighboring residents in attendance proceeded to state
their objection to a residential care facility for people with
emotional problems. One neighbor said that she did not feel it was
appropriate in a residential neighborhood. Another neighbor
stated that it was not appropriate in a neighborhood where there
were "upwards of thirty small children on our street alone". And
yet another neighbor stated that he thought there were already too
many similar facilities in the immediate area, referring to a home
for homeless teenagers and another facility that he believed housed
a drug and alcohol rehabilitation program.
Mrs. Dela Rosa was asked if they proposed to accept residents
recovering from drug or alcohol problems, and Mr. Dela Rosa stated
emphatically that they would not. Mr. Dela Rosa was then asked,
by a neighbor, if he himself was opposed to the establishment of a
residential care facility for the emotionally disturbed at this
location, to which he answered that he was.
Upon questioning, Mr. Dela Rosa stated that he would withdraw his
application and work with Community Care Licensing to change his
application with them. Ann Pedder Pease suggested that he might
want to continue the Conditional Use Permit application until a
later date, to give him time to work out the details with Community
Care Licensing, and the Dela Rosas agreed.
The meeting closed at 7:30 p.m.
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TI-IE c....1 OF CHUl.A VISTA DISCLOSURE ST/h'EMENT
You arc required to file a Stalemenl of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial inleresls, payments, or campaign
conlri~utions, on all mailers which will require discretionary aelion on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
all other official bodies. The following information mUSI be disclosed:
1. List Ihe names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the suhject of the application or the
contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor. material supplier.
TIZ.INIO"'1) 1/10 Wt.A f<..~A
OWN6R
2. If any person' idenlified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnershipo lisllhe names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership inlerest in the partnership.
NONe
3. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is non.profit organi7..ation or a Irusto IiSI the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profil organization or as trustee or bcnenciary or trustor of the trust.
NONe-
4. Have you had more than S250 worth of business transaclcd with any mem~er of the City stace, Boards, Commissions,
Committee.s, and Council within Ihe past Iwelve months? Yes_ No /' If yeso please indicate person(s): _
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employeeso consultants, or independent COnlraClors Who
you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
J..JONE.
6. Have you and/or your officers or agcnts, in the aggregate, contributed more than S 1,000 to a Councilmember in the
current or preceding election period? Ycs_ NoL If yes, state which Councilmembcr(s):
Date:
/ 1/023 /7'f
/ I
· · · (NOTE: AIIaCb additional paJeS as DeCCSS8ry) · · ·
~~jL~
Signature of contractor/applicant
TRINII)AD M. VEt.~ rzos~
Print or type name of contraetor(applicant
. Persoll is defillcd QS: "All)' ;mlivicma/, finn, co.pamter!hip. ju;IU ventIIl't, as.mdat;on, soci41 club, fratmuJI or8cJt!jZQtiml, cotporluiorl, estate. tnur, receille1, syndicate.
this mid OilY olha COUllI)'. ciIy alld COUlltry, city mw,ic;PQUty, dUtricl, or oUlCT poIiticQI subdiviJ;otl, or tJlry other ~p iN combUuu;on acullg AS Q WaiL"
'.-~""""'''''~''"'"'''': ~'T' "
June 27, 1995
To:
Chair and Members of the Planning Commissio
From:
Ken Lee, Assistant Director of Planning
It's that time of year again wherein the City Council requests that
each Board and Commission prepare a one page Summary of Activities
highlighting the past fiscal year.
Attached is a draft of a Summary of Activities for FY 94-95 which
has been prepared for your review to edit and add to, etc. I have
not prepared any statements relating to Planning Commission's
recommendations for the coming year, however, a Summary of
Activities and recommendations, which the Planning Commission
authorized for 93-94, has been attached to provide you with
information regarding last year's recommendations.
Note this item has been placed on your agenda for the meeting of
July 12 for your consideration.
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES
FY 1994/95
NAME OF BOARD, COMMISSION, OR COMMITTEE (B/C/C)
PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Chambers
MEETING TIME/PLACE 2nd/4th Wed.-7:00 p.m.
3rd/Wed.Workshop - 5:30 p.m., CR 2/3
NUMBER OF MEMBERS ~
GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE B/C/C:
Serves as the official planning agency of Chula Vista and evaluates major land use proposals in terms of their
impact on the City. It conducts public hearings on significant planning, zoning and land subdivision matters,
and recommends action and policy to the City Council. The General Plan and specific plans are prepared under
the guidance of the Planning Commission.
HIGHLIGHTS OF ACTIVITIES DURING THE PAST YEAR:
. The Planning Commission's efforts for FY 94-95 were concentrated on new or revised planning
documents, to provide clarity and measurable standards to aid the public and staff. As a result the
Commission recommended approval of:
1. a new City Design Manual
2. a new City Landscape Manual which incorporated requirements for private and public
landscaping projects
3. a new Child Care Element
Note: Both the Child Care Element and the Design Manual have been honored by the local San Diego
Planning Association.
. Subdivision activity increased in 94-95 with the Planning Commission recommending approval of five
subdivisions totalling nearly 500 single family homes. A large percentage of these units involved higher
density, small lot products which required a more detailed analysis than traditional single family lots.
. Planning Commission completed several Zoning Ordinance amendments including an amendment
allowing damaged condominiums to be rebuilt at existing densities thus eliminating potentially costly
refinancing delays facing property owners.
. The Planning Commission provided recommendations and input on a number of high profile and/or
highly debated projects such as:
1. the 1-54/Broadway industrial to commercial rezone
2. establishing a new car wash facility at the corner of Bonita Road and Lynwood Drive
3. placing time limits on interim private schools within industrial business park areas
4. providing additional quality low-income housing projects in western and eastern Chula Vista
m: homc\p lanning\j oann \pc9495
SUMMARY OF ACTIVITIES
FY 1993/94
NAME OF BOARD, COMMISSION, OR COMMITTEE (B/C/C) - PLANNING COMMISSION
. Council Chambers
MEETING TIMElPlACE 2nd/4th Wed. - 7:00 n.m. NUMBER OF MEMBERS...l..
3rd Wed. Workshop - 5:30 p.m., CR 2(3
GENERAL PURPOSE OF THE B/C/C:
Serves as the official planning agency of Chula Vista and evaluates major land use proposals in terms of their
impact on the City. It conducts public hearings on significant planning, wning and land subdivision matters,
and recommends action and policy to the City Council. The General Plan and specific plans are prepared
under the guidance of the Planning Commission.
HIGHLIGHTS OF ACTIVmES DURING THE PAST YEAR:
. The Planning Commission completed its work on the Otay Ranch General Development Plan.
. The Commission's efforts for FY 93-94 were concentrated on the City's streamlining program.
. Planning Commission representatives were assigned to the newly formed Design Review Manual
Subcommittee as well as the Subcommittee for the Conditional Use Permit Land Use Review.
. The purpose of both the Design Review and CUP subcommittees is to help draft new guidelines,
making the City's processing more efficient and user friendly.
. The Planning Commission placed a heavy emphasis on being more educated and more informed in
the planning process by:
holding various workshops with the Planning and Engineering staff involving tentative and
final map, reviewing the environmental impact analysis and Initial Study processing;
reviewing the Advance Planning Division's work program;
receiving an update on the ability of the State water program to deliver water.
. In addition, two Planning Commissioners were fortunate enough to be able to attend the American
Planning Association National Conference in San Francisco, which focused on a variety of p1anning
programs, such as housing affordabilityprograms, regional planning, and planning for high-technology
industry.
COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO COUNCIL:
. The Summary of Activity Reports filed with the City Council in the last two years has included a
recommendation asking that the Planning Commission members be compensated for meetings.
Compensating planning commissions is a common practice both county and statewide. The Planning
Commission urges Council to either provide compensation for each meeting (see reference on
compensation on next page) or amend the Planning Commission budget for conferences and travel
from $3,100 to $7,000. This increase would make it possible for all seven members to attend a
conference and become better informed on issues.
.
The Commission also requests that joint workshop meetings be scheduled with the Councilor that
Council include Planning Commission members on the various City tours that are scheduled. In lieu
of joint meetings with the entire Council and Commission, it is suggested that Council consider having
the Mayor and the Planning Commission Chair meet on a quarterly basis.
.
Compensation - At the Planning Commission's request, various cities throughout the County were
polled last year regardingwhether they are providing compensation for their Planning Commissioners.
Out of 10 cities surveyed, one-half are providing compensation with the lowest being La Mesa and
Lemon Grove at $35 per meeting and the highest at $100 per meeting for El Cajon. Note: The City
adjacent to us, National City, provides $75 per meeting.
DA1E:
'1 J 1- I ) q1
I I
I
~')
"
to! 0-
SIGNED: . / L ' :J
Qt
Chairman
June 29, 1995
To: ) Chair amd Members of Planning Commission
From: jl.. Ken Lee, Assistant Director of Planning
Subj ect1: Calendar of Meetings for month of July, August, September
and October
Attached is a draft proposal setting forth a very busy Planning
Commission schedule for the next four months. please note the
dates, times and conference rooms and review for discussion
purposes at our July 12 meeting.
I would appreciate any comments or concerns you have regarding this
proposed schedule.
Attachment
DRAFT
July 12, 1995
July 19, 1995
July 26, 1995
August 9, 1995
August 16, 1995
August 23, 1995
August 30, 1995
September 6, 1995
September 13, 1995
September 20, 1995
September 27, 1995
October 11, 1995
October 18, 1995
(PCSCHEDULE)
REVISED 6/28/95
PLANNING COMMISSION
City of Chula Vista
Calendar of Meetings
Regular PC Meeting
Special PC Meeting
(EIR for MCA Theatre)
Regular PC Meeting
Special PC Workshop (Dinner)
Overall Design/Village Design
SPA/PC District Regs
PC Workshop (Dinner)
Otay Ranch - EIR/Traffic/RMP
Regular PC Meeting
Special PC Meeting Workshop (Dinner)
Otay Ranch PFFP/Housing/Parks
Possible Special Workshop
Regular PC Meeting
Special PC Meeting
Otay Ranch EIR Hearing
Regular PC Meeting
Regular PC Meeting
Otay Ranch Public Hearing SPAlDesign
Special PC Meeting
Otay Ranch PFFP/Air Quality
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
5:30 p.m.
Conference Rooms 2/3
5:30 p.m.
Conference Rooms 2/3
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
5:30 p.m.
Conference Rooms 2/3
5:30 p.m.
Conference Rooms 2/3
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
rJ
c
11) '"
~.=
-"S
=~
~~
~I ..
cl~
<'C
r:
~
!
110
i
~
o
~
9
rn
rn
i
~
8
~
~
Z
~
rJ
c
11) '"
0'1'=
~"S
. -
\D ..
:~
'"
:! ...
:; i::
< g
~
11) [!I
~ a
-.=
~c
..
1;;5:
~~
c c
<,:3
c
CI
"::I
..
~
E' 'j:! N
Do ~ .-
.. 0\ V") 00\
~ ... OCIQ;~U
o'c! 1; uuu<
~ e;- ~.i~urnu
~ !'!.i'~~ [!I
~ fIloE~~
O~ ~ t t ... ~ ....
1=1 ...., ..... V'J ..
"... ,_, '" :d C ""'
""'.........CI..._
'--' , ~ "" U DII"
~e~tB.~ls
~!!'5~..t:
1Io~lIorn~~
.......
~
...
C
tlr:
.s:i5
CI ..
c'- ~ '
.- =... 1:1
0; ... C 0; .-
i :aC~...1S
~O'og::.s.;;
,-....c-c'"
c._c.C ~
MZ<rnZU<
&J I I I I I I
':e1e1e1e1e1~
1Io1Oil1Oil1Oil1Oil1Oil....
~
-
-
Q;
u
~
. . . . . . .
~
00
C:!
00
~
00
N
OCI
~
~
M
~
~
,
C
..!!
110
'" ,
C C C
.!P.s J!
[!I ';110
~=DII
... DII C
ct) 4.f'-
~ <;; .. g:: ;
'ij~~~~
~ .. i!! i!! i!!
..~ooo
~~~~~
o rnrn rnrn
~
,
1;
~
. . . . .
C
~
-
l!
.9
'"
.,
J
~.
":>
~
~
'i3
.s
"~
e
ci.
o
~
'"
-
rn
~
~
!:!
Z
o
...
rn
rn
~
~
~
~
110
.,.,
~
o
,.,
~
11)
0'1
0'1
-
<to
-
t
,Q
~
o
~
-
-
~
-
=
~
...
c
.5
-
C
CI
U
.
~
0'1
-
..:
-
t
,Q
CI
-
...
o
[!I i
... ~
:a ....01)
C ~ C
... ""' 'C 1:1
:J!5: I:I...CI..
5< .~o'a~
=.;; t!SbCl~
~'o:' I.:: C ~ ,-
C;o; '.c ,- [!I
... 1:1 \;; ~ C ~
=..!! d ~.~
<=-t"Dllf
~< e1e1~'"
~1}jIloIOilIOil~O
. . . . . . .
11)
0'1
0'1
-
Q
M
..
...
,Q
5
~
...
rn
e1
IOiI
...
1:1
o
;5
rn
1:1
o
~
~
...
:=
,Q
c
110
...
~
o
~
I
(j
.