HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Rpts./1995/05/24 (2)
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1
Meeting Date 5/24/95
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCS-95-05; Tentative Subdivision Map for Parcel R-
28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05, involving development of 51 detached
condominium dwellings and located within the Eastlake Greens Planned
Community - Eastlake Development Company
Resolution Approving and imposing conditions on the Tentative
Subdivision Map for EastLake Greens Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05,
making the necessary findings and readopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for IS-
94-19
The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Eastlake Greens Unit 28,
Chula Vista Tract 95-05, in order to subdivide 6.0 acres of land into nine (9) lots, four
residential lots and five (5) open space lots (Lot A-E), and develop a gate-guarded residential
community of 51 detached single-family condominium dwellings. The property located along
the north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway and designated
as Parcel R-28 within the EastLake Greens Planned Community (see locator).
An Initial Study, IS-94-19 was previously prepared in conjunction with the recent amendment
to the EastLake Greens SPA Plan. The Environmental Review Coordinator has found that the
project implements and falls under the purview of IS-94-19 and that no new effects could occur
and no new mitigation measures are required for PCS-95-05.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution PCS-95-05 recommending that the City
Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05, in
accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
On May 12, 1995, the Zoning Administrator approved the development plans for the project
(DRC 95-29) subject to compliance with several conditions requiring site and architectural plan
modifications and approval of PCS-95-05 by the City Council.
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 5/24/95
DISCUSSION:
I. Site Characteristics
The 6.0 acre parcel is located within the Eastlake Greens Planned Community and has
been graded as part of the Eastlake mass grading program. The relative elevation of the
site to the street decreases from a west to east direction ranging from 16 feet above street
level at the most westerly point along the Clubhouse Drive frontage to 4 feet at the main
driveway access and leveling off at the most easterly frontage point. The property is
surrounded by variable landscaped slopes on all sides.
2. Zoning: and Land Use
Site PC (Planned Community) - Residential Vacant (target density - 60 du)
North
South
East
West
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
Open Space
Residential
Open Space
Open Space
EastLake Golf Course
SFD /detached
EastLake Golf Course/Club
Eastlake Golf Course
3. Proposal
The proposed development involves minor regrading of the site, construction of 51
detached single-family condominium dwellings on building pads averaging approximately
3,000 sq. ft., and enhancement of the existing open space landscape buffer along the
south side of the property (Lot A-E). Staff is recommending that the development
proposal also incorporate the golf course trail jmprovements identified on the Eastlake
Greens SPA Trails Plan that are most closely associated with the project, i.e. the golf
course view point west of the property and the trail markers along N. Greensview Drive
and Hunte Parkway (see Draft City Council Resolution condition #27).
Page 3, Item ~
Meeting Date 5/24/95
4. Analvsis
The Tentative Subdivision Map will create five open space lots and four residential air-
space condominium lots. Private fenced yards are proposed to be allocated to each
dwelling unit in accordance with the attached landscape concept plan exhibit. The project
will be served by a private street/drive system. An undulating cul-de-sac (Palomira
Street) is proposed to provide access to the site via Clubhouse Drive constituting the
primary road within the subdivision. Palomira Street will be constructed to public street
standards and will accommodate the required guest parking in parking bays along both
sides of the street. Private drives off Palomira Street are intended to access courtyard
areas enhanced with decorative hardscape and landscape treatment around which the
majority of the units will be clustered. The remaining units will be arranged in a more
typical linear fashion along Palomira Street.
a. Compliance with EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
The project will have a density of 8.5 du/ac. This is consistent with the Eastlake Greens
SPA Plan density range of 5-15 du/ac as well as with the target density (9.8 du/ac) and
target dwelling unit number (60 du) for the project site.
b. Compliance with Planned Community Regulations and Residential Design
Guidelines.
Development of the site is subject to compliance with the RC-1O residential district
property development standards. The majority of those standards are established by
approval of individual site plans jn order to ensure proper site plan and architectural
design relationships and to provide adequate flexibility for the development of various
product types. The site plan and architectural design of the project has been considered
and approved by the Zoning Administrator subject to compliance with several conditions
requiring site and architectural plan modifications and approval of PCS-95-05 by the City
Council. The Zoning Administrator has found that the proposed architecture and site
planning for the subject project, as conditioned, will positively contribute in the
enhancement of the Eastlake Greens residential community. Compliance with the
applicable property development standards and residential design guidelines has been
ensured via the design review process.
c. Compliance with the California Vehicle Code.
Although the California Vehicle Code prohibits obstruction of any public street, gated
communities containing private streets can be approved. This project falls under the
aforementioned category where a gate-guarded entrance can be allowed. The reasons for
this are as follows:
Page 4, Item ~
Meeting Date 5/24/95
. The project site is a relatively small (6.0 acres), self-contained site which was
never intended to provide a link between segments of the public street system.
. The site setting precludes construction of a second access point due to existing
grade differentials.
. Access to and throughout the project site will be provided by private streets and
drives.
. The proposed access is adequate to handle the anticipated traffic load into the
project.
. The project has been designed so that potential stacking at the entrance will not
interfere with Clubhouse Drive.
For the reasons noted staff is recommending approval of the subject tentative subdivision map
in accordance with the conditions contained in the attached resolutions.
Attachments
1. Planning Commission Resolution and Draft City Council Resolution
2. Exhibits: (Locator. TSM, Development plans. Eastlake Greens SPA Trails Plan)
3. RCC minutes
4. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for 15-94-19
5. Disclosure Statement
(m: \home \planning\pcs9505. per)
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
&
DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-95-05
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE
GREENS UNIT 28, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-05
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on March 31, 1995 by Eastlake
Development Company ("Owner") and California Pacific Homes ("Developer"), and
WHEREAS, the Owner and Developer requested in said application approval to subdivide
Unit 28 of Eastlake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3, located on the
north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway, into 9 lots
containing a total of 51 dwelling units ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-94-19, of possible adverse environmental impacts of the
project was previously conducted in conjunction with the amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I expansion) General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan, EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality
Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastLake Greens Master
Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3) and Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program on 15-94-19 was adopted by the City Council on August 16,
1994; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERe) has concluded that the
proposed project implements and falls under the purview of Mitigated Negative Declaration
IS-94-19 and that no new affects could occur and no new mitigation measures are required for
PCS-95-05 and recommends readoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said tentative
subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners and residents within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10)
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.,
May 24, 1995, in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby readopts Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the project in
accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 24th day of May, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(f:\home\planniIJg\amyw\pcs95-oS.pcr)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS
ON THE TENT A TIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE
GREENS UNIT 28, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-05, MAKING
THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR IS-94-19
1. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, is commonly known as Unit 28 of EastLake Greens Tentative
Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3; and for the purpose of general
description herein consists of 6.0 acres and located on the north side of
Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway within the
EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community
("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on March 31,1995 EastLake Development Company ("Owner") and
California Pacific Homes ("Developer") filed a tentative subdivision map
application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and
requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Greens Unit 28,
Chula Vista Tract 95-05 in order to subdivide the Project Site into 9 lots
("Project"); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously
adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199 ("SPA"); and 3) a Tentative
Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15200
("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan
(AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation
Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16898 on
November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, SPA, TSM, AQIP and WCP amendment
previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994;
and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on May 24, 1995, and voted (---) to recommend that the City Council
approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed
below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on m_m, 1995, on the Project and to receive
the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony
with regard to same; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
determine and resolve as follows:
II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing on this project held on May 24, 1995, and the minutes and resolutions
resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
Ill. MITlGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED;
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FINDINGS;
APPROVALS
A. Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and
considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
(known as Document No. C094-180 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and
comments thereon, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project
and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as
Document No. C094-181 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior
to approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
significant effect on the environment and thereby readopts the Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
-2-
B. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The City Council of the City of Chula Vjsta finds that the significant
environmental effect(s) identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be
reduced to below a level of significance if the mitigation measures in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are implemented. The Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby readopted to ensure that its
provisions are complied with.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance
with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines,
and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-l9 reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council.
VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for
Eastlake Greens Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract No. 95-05 is in conformance with the
elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use
The proposed density of 8.5 du/ac is in compliance with the previously
approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan density range (5-15 du/ac) for the
subject parcel.
b. Circulation
All of the on-site private streets and drives and off-site public streets
required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or D IF fees paid by
the developer in accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Financing
Plan and Development Agreement.
The private streets/drives within the subdivision will be designed in
accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements. The
-3-
adjoining street system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of
traffic from this and other area projects.
c. Housing
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan area has been conditioned to provide a
minimum of 10% affordable housing including a mix of housing types and
lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various
apartment densities that will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for
persons of various incomes. The proposed single-family detached
residential housing type is consistent with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
d. Conservation
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for IS-94-19 addressed the goals and policies of the
Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of
this site to be consistent with these goals and policies.
e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space
The project site is located within the EastLake Greens SPA Plan area.
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open
space consistent with City policies. The project will implement in part
conditions of approval for the EastLake Greens SPA Plan requiring the
provision/construction of a golf course trail.
f. Seismic Safety
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of
the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site.
g. Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed
the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and
have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for
emergency serVIces.
-4-
h. Noise
Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report
SEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 adequately
address the noise policy of the General Plan. All dwelling units within the
project will be required to be designed so as to not exceed the interior
noise level of 45 dBA. Additionally, all exterior private open space will
be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to
achieve a 65 dBA noise level for outside private areas.
1. Scenic Highway
The project site is not located adjacent to any designated scenic highway
but a landscaped open space buffer and a decorative wall will be provided
along the Clubhouse Drive frontage in order to enhance the appearance of
the project from the street.
J. Bicycle Routes
Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned
Community area design and are presently in use.
k. Public Buildings
No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is
subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies
that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the
optimum sitting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities
as required by Government Code Section 66473.1.
D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal
conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact
created by the proposed development.
-5-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project
subject to the general and special conditions set forth below.
VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval of the foregoing Tentative Subdivision Map which is stated to be
conditioned on "General Conditions" is hereby conditioned as follows:
A. Project Site is Improved with Project
Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the
Project as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 except as
modified by this Resolution.
B. Implement Mitigation Measures
Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all
mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental
Impact Report for Eastlake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-94-19.
C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, all portions of IS-94-
19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project.
D. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project.
Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled
conditions of approval of the EastLake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract
88-3 established by Resolution No. 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989,
and any subsequent amendment(s) to such Tentative Map condition(s) approved
by the City Council, the General Plan Amendment conditions adopted by
Resolution No. 17309 by the City Council on December 14, 1993, and shall
remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and provisjons
of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned Community
District Regulations, the Eastlake Greens Development Agreement, the Water
Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the Public
Facilities Financing Plan.
-6-
E. Implement Public Facilities Financjng Plan
Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Greens
Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer
to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City
Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision.
F. Project Phasing
Developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by
the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map,
if phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps.
The phasing plan shall include:
a. A site plan showing the lot lines and lot numbers, the phase lines and
phase numbers and number of dwelling units in each phase.
b. A table showing the phase number, the lots included in the phase and the
number of units included in each phase.
Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit
of development shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of
Planning. The City reserves the right to conditionally approve each final map and
require improvements, facilities and/or dedications as necessary to provide
adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments.
The City Engineer and Planning Director may at their discretion, modify the
sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such
revision(s).
IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Prior to approval of the final map, unless otherwise indicated, the Developer shall:
STREETS. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
I. Design and construct all streets to meet the City standards for public residential
streets, or as approved by the City Engineer. Submit improvement plans for
approval by the City Engineer detailing the horizontal and vertical alignment of
said streets.
-7-
2. The name of the proposed private street (Palomira Street) shall be changed to
"Corte Palomira" or "Palomira Court." Said modification shall be reflected in
the final map for the Project Site.
3. Locate the centerline of entry to the subdivision a minimum of 250' from the
centerline of the nearest street intersection.
4. Provide a turnaround of 28' minimum radius at the private street entrance to
subdivision or as approved by the City Engineer.
5. Provide decorative pavement delineating the boundary between the public and
private streets.
6. Install a pedestrian ramp on the south side of Clubhouse Drive opposite the
northwesterly corner of Corte Palomira to City Standards. Design all pedestrian
ramps, including those on private property, in accordance with City standards.
7. Relocate the existing street light on Clubhouse Drive to the northwesterly corner
of Corte Palomira.
8. Align the public sewer to be outside of fenced areas.
9. Desjgn public sewer with the minimum radius for 8" diameter PVC sewer to be
280' ("Greenbook" table 306-1.2.13(C)).
10. Sewer mains on private street and connection to existing public sewer in
Clubhouse Drive may be public. All other sewer lines are to be private. Provide
City access through gated entry for public sewer maintenance.
11. Provide a minimum 12' wide improved access designed to H-20 wheel loading
to all public sewer manholes.
12. Connect the water line serving the subdivision to the eXlstmg water line in
Clubhouse Drive at a more direct point of connection westerly of the proposed
point of connection.
13. Guarantee the construction of all public improvements (street lights, sewers, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, utilities, etc) deemed necessary to provide
service to the subject subdivision in accordance with City standards.
14. Provide to the City a letter from Otay Municipal Water District indicating that the
assessments/bonded indebtedness for all parcels dedicated to the City have been
paid or that no assessments exist on the parcel(s).
-8-
15. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the
subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage
facil ities.
16. Design and construct all required water facilities in accordance with Otay Water
District standards and pay all appropriate water fees.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
17. Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to the original document prepared
by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer.
18. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation
control plan as part of grading plans.
19. Submit letters of permission to grade for all off-site grading.
20. Submit a list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on
fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations.
21. Submit an updated hydrology report for the project.
AGREEMENTS
22. Agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject subdivision if
anyone of the following occur:
A. Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
B. Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services exceed
the adopted City threshold standards.
C. The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or
otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to
satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing
and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements
affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the
City Planning Director and Public Works Director.
23. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by
-9-
the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any
approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision
provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or
proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the
defense.
24. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosIOn, siltation or
increase flow of drainage resulting from this project.
25. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company")
are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television
service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only
those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance
with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further
compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating
and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been,
or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
26. Agree to submit a detail landscape and irrigation plan for open space lots
A,B,C,D,E and common open space areas inclusive of front and exterior side
yard areas to the City Landscape Architect for review and approval prior to
issuance of grading permits. The plans shall provide tree/shrub species size
information, and hardscape materials specifications. The final
landscape/irrigation plans shall be in compliance with Section 6.4 (General
Landscape Concept) of the Eastlake Greens SPA.
27. Agree to improve the golf course view point west of the subject site in
conjunction with the development of the Project Site and install golf course trail
markers along N. Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway in accordance with the
Eastlake Greens Trails Plan. Detailed development plans for the golf course view
point and trail marker design details shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and Parks and Recreation Department for review and approval prior
to issuance of building permits.
28. Agree to comply with all conditions of approval for DRC-95-29.
OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS
29. Offer to grant in fee on the Final Map open space Lots "A", "B", "C", "D" and
"E". The minimum width of Lot "A" shall be 10 feet.
30. Submit a list of all facilities located on open space lots to be maintained by the
existing Eastlake Maintenance District No.1. This list shall include a
-10-
description, quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all
facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls,
fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage
structures and landscaping. Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for
open space maintenance. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the
number of acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the
estimation of a maintenance budget thereof.
31. Pay additional fees on a fair-share basis into Assessment District Numbers 85-2,
90-3 and other applicable assessments districts due to a change in units approved
subsequent to Djstrict formation as determined by the City Engineer.
32. Pay additional Transportation DIF on a fair-share basis into the DIF fund due to
a change in units approved subsequent to formation of AD 90-3, which funds a
portion of the Transportation DIF, as determined by the City Engineer.
33. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment
districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary. Request
apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $40/unit/district to
cover costs.
34. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that
additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation
DIF Fund, and that these additjonal fees are reflected in the purchase price of the
home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the
assessment distrjct's Engineer's Report. Submit disclosure form for the approval
of the City Engineer.
EASEMENTS
35. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for general utility purposes along street
frontage of all open space lots proposed for dedication to the City.
36. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for construction and maintenance of public
sewer facilities within open space Lot E.
37. Grant to the City a minimum 12' wide easement over public sewer within Lot E
and the private drive at the westerly terminus of Corte Palomira.
38. Grant to the City a minimum 24' wide general utility and access easement within
Corte Palomira.
-11-
39. Grant to Otay Municipal Water District a 10' wide easement for construction and
maintenance of water facilities within open space Lot E. Provide acceptance
certificate of said easement on final map.
40. Indicate on the final map a future private storm drain easement to the
Homeowners' Association over the storm drain facilities within Lot E.
MISCELLANEOUS
41. Submit, process and record a boundary adjustment along the easterly boundary
of the proposed project prior to final map approval or include the owner of the
adjacent property (EastLake Golf Course) as signator on the final map.
42. File with the City of Chula Vista a copy of the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R'S) applicable to the Project
Site. The CC&R's shall include, among others, provisions for the:
a. Formation of a homeowner's association (HOA).
b. HOA responsibilities to maintain all private streets and driveways,
commons areas inclusive of front and exterior side yard areas, private
sewers and drainage systems, except those assumed by the Eastlake II
Community Association.
c. Prohibition of the television antennas, garage conversions, parking outside
of the designated areas, parking of recreational vehicles and boat trailers.
d. I nclusion of the City of Chula Vista as a party to said Declaration
authorizing the City to enforce the terms and conditions of said
Declaration insofar as said enforcement applies to areas of public concern,
in accordance with CVMC section 18.44.010.
43. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD
'83).
44. Submit copies of Final Maps in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior
to approval of each Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of
the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the
information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in
duplicate on 5-112 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map.
-12-
X. CODE REQUIREMENTS
45. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision
Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
46. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal
Code requirements.
47. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy:
a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees.
b. Signal Participation Fees.
c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection
fees.
d. Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January 1, 1995).
e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows DIF (or submit letter of credit
prior to final map approval).
Pay the amount of said fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits.
48. Install required fire hydrants prior to delivery of any combustible construction
materials.
49. Install a knox-box or knox-key-switch at the gated entry, as required by the Fire
Marshal.
XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation
to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval
of this Resolution.
-13-
XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with tbe County Clerk.
XIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined
by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this
resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(f:\home\planning\amyw\pcs95-05. ccr)
-14-
EXHIBITS
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~~, Ecstllcke Development Co. SUBDIVISION
C) ~'6'~, No. of Clubhouse Dr. between Request: Propose development of 51 single family
Greensview Dr. & Easlake Pkwy. detached dwelling
SCALE, FILE NUMBER, Exhibit A
NORTH 400' PCS-95-05
.ii!iI1Ii!iI1ili!!i!!!UI!!.
fu ~ ~h' ~!':~ ~ ~~!c i!~~~ ' t t ~l~~~~>~;:
~ . wwc! c\'~~ 0 ,,!:>~ ~~~~. ~ 5 v~u~t~~~ ~
~ ; ~~~~~t;lt ~ ~~~: ~~~~< ~ ~"~ ~~~~~S~.~~
; ~ ,~i~~n~!~ i !Ii~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~H ~~~~~~~~~,i~
~ ~ ~>~~~ > O' . ~-~,,! u o~~ ~~~;'~4 ~ 0
~ ;' ~~~~,~~.':: ~ ~~d!~ Z~~!j ~ ~~~ I:~~;h~,~~",
~ ~ !B~~'8~)5 .~i~ S 8~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~5~.~~~~8~~
'._ ,t~c~~;~o ~~~Iz~ ;-d~C ~ id~ ~~~[d~~~~~
~~~"~l.~~iE,,~~~t~~~~~ ~P~f ~ ~~~ ~~~[~~~~:t:r~
VI : 5 ~~~~ ~E~ ~;: d a,~~~ ~! ~ ~ g~ !, ~ ~ ~.f ~~~ ~; ~ ~i: 5' i: ~ ~ ~ ~~
I!:! ~" ",C~ut; ~~~~~ ~~! "0, Cz ~~ Z "~~~:t '6"'~ ~
!f ~~i~~~!r~~;!:~~~~~O~l ~H~~i;~~~~!ig~;a:3:;~~
oJ H~t~~:~~~~~~U;!~~U;~~~ ~~~~~i';a~~"t~~~~~"'gH~~
0( ,iz i~ ~ ~ ~!i U~ ~ i~ ~ ~":2~~' ~ l8~ 5: ~ > ~ ~ ~:: ~ 8~ ~ ~ !"'t.. 0 ~::;B
. 1~.~~uf~3~i~-~~~&'~~~~;l5i~~I~;;~~~8.~i;~~'~!
~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ b~ ~;g ~ r ~~g~:!Ii; ~~ ~ ~ i ~ !~!~ ~ ~ ~ i*~~ ~ ~ ~;~ ~
.
o
Z
<(
....J
a...
f-
Z
LUC/)
~Z
OW ~
u:JWCO~
>a:C'\I ~
LU," .;;!
0'-'00
LU ~-
f-WZ~
CI)~'-:S
O<C-j!
Z-IZ;;:
<(.- :::) ~
a...C/) t::
<( 0
~<C
LUW
>
~
f-
Z
LU
f-
"
.
.'i
Ii
.
>
"
o
.
:;
>z
~5
""
'\ ","''''
I ()Zi
"i'
! ~ 11 ~ol
, ~~, ~,. ~~~ ~~
I
I-<!>-j
I
- .
! '
d ,~
~~. ~,5 ~;'
H ~ ~~
~ ~ h
i i ~
1 'i ~
f ~ it'
- ~ " ~ ~~
~t~~~B
I I ! N a,
II " I ~: @~~ [ 1 'I
3 ~ I
o I g
m ! ~ ~ i
..I S" ~
"I!" ;
i ~ ~ ~ :>;
~ ( ~ "- ~ 'i
~ ~ ; ~ ! ~
.
<
.
>
>.
~~
>1
.........Q~-
:..__c.
I ,".
i ;I~ j ~
II, . 0
,I '/~ i ~~
~. i : ii:!X
~t' ~~
II ~',
<.> dl1:
t:fii
---.~
+----
!"-',' -
11C:' ~._._-
I "
1 ~I' ! >' 'j s',
! ' . ! , ,
;.J ., I,
I ; .Z ,; If
" ..
, ! >' i!
, .- .~ >
gi1i II ..
, ..
..
! J , >~ >~
" ~~i I ..
, .<
,- " "m, t-!!i..
~i 8di '; <(::&i
, 2::311:
Z' h :f,a
,
~ ~: ., ~!
",+.
;t ,
~.- ~.-
I"
~!
(JJ
Z
~W ~
~~WCO~
<(~c::C'\I~
a.Z,,, .<
C(~~O~
::;<LWZ>
LLJO !2
~m~~;
t'.!t , ~a:i<(-~
>' t .1'iIL!~ ZO..JZo
Q) "" ",.1-.- LLJ L-~u.
@ ~ ~j~j;H ~~r-""'~
.~. j'.r -(JJ e
~ ::P;, (/)<( u
~ fii W
~
h -j
)i
~i
9
~~
~?
Ii' !
or.
.> ;::.
:~ u
~~
l'
.!
-~)~~:
',~-~~
".
-
.
:il.
".
,,"
, ,
~!I :
~ lI~i
- '"I
ijj lIE
. ..
~;
-\~
,~
~
,
!
. !
.
z
~ i
~
~
\
u
!
ff.
iff
&}
;
.!'
<'<>"''''_1
.~~~
>
~T-OT-
~
m
..
.a
s::.
)(
W
,
'>i~
.
.
.
o
"
.
>
.
o
!
,
"
g~
0<'1_ :E
Ii' 'I'
.... 5 ~\J
;;;~~ .1 ~
;;;"'~ ...J:;
i
;1; Ii
~q~ ~~
"'0' '0
i',!i',~'~ui',
8~8:h8
~
.
.
,
~ ~
u . 9 r
~ !!lijS5
~ ~~;,~~!~
,11
~~i',
~~~r
g~~
g8~~
!~~!
~~~i
~ :~;i
~ ~~.~~
5 ~!~!
~ H~I:
..J "~~
~ i',w~>
~ ~~~~
.
. <
ja~ ;
o i
.
=h ~~ip~il::i
~ g:.i ~ .;~,.,;!:
. .
ir ~Ui(!~~:~~
i ~H~--"i.~
~ =t: u:I~~i
CI ~g ~~'~'al
z~.. I>
9 j; ~I!H
5
~ I,
~ I'
9 ~ ~t: ,.,?~
.... :Ii ~i! ~~"
~ i~t:
~ o:~5I
:i
~i +.;~~
Z
<C
~ co~
C\I~
I- s::
CLW::J
LJ.J ~C3
U<C~
z (/)
o ...J ~
ol-~
LJ.J en ~
CL <CO
<C >-
f-
UWo
(/)
o
Z
<C
-'
"
o
.
'"
.
-'
"
.
a:
. -
:~ "~ ~ ~~
J,,,c,, ,.
I: ~;~~g~~~~~
Ii ~~~~~~ii~i
~i "~cO ~'u u
! ~
i,!.;!I'L.
~~~[~~~gH
i ~~~~~~~:?~;
f~~~~~~~:~
I UU~~B~~
~ : H~ngH!
! JI ~~~~H~~~~
, "',0
I- '"'1)
~~~;
"'""
"~,,~ ?,;
~~i~ ~~
Illi !;
'-, n
!IIidi
~ ili!! !i
~ ;~~~~ ~~
i II!II !!
o
..
8~~ ~~~B
~n uu
a~~! ~
"ii"., i;~ H ~
gt ~= eh ~~ ~
~t ~ ~~ -" ~
j!!!,:i II lidi ~
~~i ~2~;: ~. ~ ~ ~~i ~~ ~
~;~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ,;~~ ~~ 'i:
~~~ ~~ ~~. ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~3 ~
~'l ~" ;)~! " K ~ ~~~ ~'"" ~
<( ~%I ~~ ~B~ ~ ~ ~ ::'i~ ~i~ ~
a; ~'t~ ~~ ~g~ ~ g ~ ~!~ ~~~ ~
~ ~~~ ~~ n; ~ ~ ~. ~~~ i!~ ~~
u ~~~ It: ~~~ ~ ~ ! ~I~ ~~! ~i
z ~~~ ji ~~5 ~ ~ L~~~ !:ij~ ;;
* ;;~i ~~ ~~: -: . . ~~
w
o
0'
~ ~H
i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i
\ ! I1III1 ,
2 ~
~.
w ,
<
,
0>
= ~ ~
I mill
,~n
I Iii III i
,
o
~
;
is
~~gg ~
~~H~~ -
"S' ""
w > ~:~,~ ~~ ~~
I ~ ~ ~~~~'i~ ~~~~~~
~. ~ e ~~~~~~ ~a,~~
!.~ ! ~~~I~:~~liiii
~;~~la!I~~~~~~~~ .
~ ~ 3 t ~
,~~ 8 ~ "db~ ~i
'~~i~~~~!~~i~~i~~~~~
i' '""""'!,"I"'!
!! ~~~~~~B~~~g ~ ~~~~
'I!~g~~g~ial~i~'~ff!!
" "I i""!""",,,,,
" ~ ~~~~~~~
g Ii ~~~u~~~~~~~~:.::~:;::.:::.::
E I ~~:.::~~:.::~~~~~~~
~ ~J
,
.
~
"
"
w
"
"
2
[J
- ~ > 0
,. .- ~ ~
;;Ji!i!I
I Iii,.
-
~
>
~
~
~
8
g
"
g
~
~
>
~!I-
o.
"w
~1~
~~
"-'<
fi:;i
<;W
h
.~
"
w
~
"
8
"
<5
~
>
,
,
,
~
-L
.
,
w
,
"
ZU)
w
O~
f--
u
""0
::J U) ,
U)".
co<U
-
..
()
...
.-
.a
.-
.c
Ie
W
II
'.
0"
".
~~
"0
00
~~
."
"w
B
ww
~"
.,
~~
~~
~~
~~
~
~:
'Iw
>0
~ ~
'.
'.
h
ow
Ow
q
~~
g~
Ow
w.
i
<ffi
w15~
~1';6
~I~~
*i~~
r
"'zO
~~~
ffit:J~
. w.
~
o
"
~
~
2:g
~~
~~
~~
'3
9@
o.
"
9 ~
~
~
"
.
o
~
o
.
"
~
@
,
o
.
~ u "'I
0::1:<:'"
~~~
f-
z:: co::;
W C\I ii
2: 0
LL
WW::J
c..? ~13
cr:: <(
c;: <C t!i
.....J ...J ~
z:: 1--"
W s:'
>- en ~
cr:: <C~
f- Wt:
z:: U
W
d::;:
"
,
.', ",'1:
.I~
' "...,~{:
~"}!"dj"_,,___ ~I
. T 1 i
Ii !I
~
nc--
'-1;" ,~
ii,
,t..J; ~
'''I'' "
)J~II . .
"1-i .'~Jt~J[ .
X~:p1'V"~
TJ
:1'..'
;':~.f:~.~{
-"j -
"'-"f.. .
""" .'
~
1
L-
I
~
~ ;
(~~,
~' "
" . '"
-, io.
01
' :, -'::-., .<'"
' """. ,..,,\'
;, '."1,'0.,.
" "-.
",5) ",'.'
" ,. F- / "
")""1cP/ .\
,0, . ',,'
, 4
I,.' '".Yi,ii
).~""",,,,,,,,,
'(
~'
, .../'
;1
~
,I
01
;
I [
, -I
~; ~
o. Q
Sj g;
~'I !
< ,
o "
~ "
I~
f\ 0 ~
J' ') ,
~ " J
~~~ ~~~
"'~
~, ~
~2
I
,
I
j
, I
--.J '
.-- :J
-
,
i
r~x~.~~:"~>
ill i! I/~C"a;~~"" , '~~
!: 1--1-'. J
~I :9, I r,<:"
" " Lc-',.o-J r
!II~, ~. P' 0 ~I
';1, !
~~[1
/A '
.\
"':I~;; \,
">'L II
"',
I~,
l::~"'''''0\
; .l~"""'''''''\'
"'1'"""'/":"'= . g:
. .
' ,
:0 ~
,;. ,~/"
''''''''Ii',\),'
~:
L,
"I ::!
S! ~i
o ;i
~! @
0; CO
I,
'I"
0:;;:
".
J~
~E~
~ii~
<.W'"'
~i~ ~
I
I
,
,
~
'-1
~ ! I
~ ''JJ
z ;::1""'
5=::=:E
u... u,o
:;j~I::r::
u
>-
c::(
:s:
L.1.J
> to <(
C\I~
0::: 0
ow~
z~c3_
o"f!;
2: ......~
2: ...J ~
ot-~
ucn~
--J <( ~
;:; ws
0....
>-
f-
~10;:::;
,
,
~;
r"-
-'._-~~--i
,
,
o
8
8
~
--~~
:'S I
~UifJ
oB;:;:
""'Uo
8~:X:
c.:J
z:
:os:::
cr: CO:'!:
<X: C\I ~
CL 0
u..
-,W~
I..LJ~U.
---oJ rI/IIfIIf'~
.....J ........~
<X: ..J ~
cr: 1-:5
<X: en G
CL u..
-' <(~
f-
<X: Wu
c...:>
CL
>-
f--
Q
c
, ~
"''''w
o,~
~2Q
""":1,
j~~
"'~z
"0<
""0
"Ww
;;;5~
"i3z
15w2
~*~
~8~
~~i~
%,,-0"-
~t:3
~g
.w
B>o.:;
--',,~
w'::%
"';::~
:jo:;o
~~~
<IJ~25
~~~
~~g
~*~~
~:;;~Q'
zU)
UJ
O~
f-U
""0
~U)
U)
cO<C
~;
~~
~~
"0
.~
~o
.5
'j
g~
~~
<w
~ I!'!~
000
. "~
~ ~ ~I
3~=
UJ~ ~I; ~)
~UJ~
UJ~~
~~
~(!)
~
..... /~,:~
. /~t>~;;." ,.~ '"
. , . /.'/""~r' .....,~~: '}-,.',
' /~ '. .. .",.. ,
/' , "'i>,,";.,' ~,,~~... ~,
~~~.~~. /"'~ , :' ....ii>. . "~~ . '~
,/. . .",.. '0 ... . '~._
7 ~. j;'.. 0' ,/ !j ,
/. ~~~ ~,%. ,', /'(,^-~- '""'Q'" . J.\Q\,. \
fJ~// ~. ,- ~ ~. -# :''/,,-, "J \~~"=_~~' \
/. · '-" (j "'. -~ DO ~", <</..J--,_~, -" --JIii\ ,
/, /~\ . . " ~'-'.~.~-- ~ · ,3> .J '-^...- c;.:;;~ ~,( lfa. I
1.~(j'7~', '~~~~~\" i~~1 ~~~~~~ V4~~~~~. _oJ (OJ) ~!J" \
/ I'R I 7' ~"~ - \ I",., . i!~ ,>V, .._....~ .~"'"
/- '" '-~ '-', , " '. , , ",.
~~~ J ','.i' ~.~~o.:: -' ::.;-.....~:-';K' If ,,, ',<v",/, ;/ ~-~i! "\1'; "_ (:
.- "':: '''..", "';("'2>v}l" ,.' '- .- _, ,,__,_,~ \
:n \\;~...J L...., 'fI' ~ :_'____,,_-"'~., ..~ \ ',"" (".j ''''~ .- .
~ 'I I . '0;:'J 'J -'" ~. ~ \ '(~ ....... \ . ':.: J, .
\ ~ . -, r., <:; '-', ". \ /I ., I ....) .-t:rf.... (
~ - ""',,, I ......./ ='-~ ~~ -. 81, UI, .,, \ -, b; """ '"
r ' .... J"'_~ _. _', , \ I' , , . ", '0,),
,. , I,Q, I '~_ \ \ \ u 'v ~1 \ , .
~ · Jc",J', . _ " I " '. '.
' \L . n, \, ,.-,,-____,, , ,,, ',~ ,,_, , .,,", '.
\ \ ' _'.,i\, &;I..~ .~\., (. \ - ~\\ '::., IJ~._ 04/'1 r~ \,,', M < .,~ . .
H ''''''I!'" C"~ _ ,I' 'II"" '.. ~~ '
\ \I J I ~(, ~\ "",::;- ~\ ~\ \\S 2 II~ .' L>"I. '$.;, _=~~.,-t~) }J\Q!.-,,~:~ ;,
. ~ "t~ ", - \' i\>. ~/J, O'~o-=7..' I~. Mi ,
. "f\\\\ . '. \, J"'~~\\ - ~\ ''";.:) ., - .. "~<<11 /
'J'" , "IL\ H' "'L" t> '. __ _, 'AY
-:.-\~ . \ \"~,,.,) -~~ ( .~) "l.', .-.U~~~.:~')\ ! ~~~~?" ,-
) '----.,,~. "--, . ii'i'....
' ''''-. ~"~. _.r-J ............ ,
\%~ j ~~~iigli~"~IJJ
~. ","", 1I~ g 'Iel ~_~. JAr
), ';'-"""""", 1'(y, ---......N:.... "II"-
-;:,-- ~O"$'~"OOIJJO~,
~'! -. >4{'.Jt '. j .'./"
-, ., . . ,
' ~ , ~ '. ,
", , , ._, ,
\\--.:..~"'. '1'-' ,--_. - i~
-,.,...".......;::-~: i,.>._., __
" , "'~;"'Z"""'--._..__ ..,_......_,;-____
.::;... _f -- L- ___
":-'., . --' ~-
-- --
~
U)
co
~
--- -
I
I
I
J
I
J
!
~
I if!i! I I !
I II III I I !
J 0 .J?;( ~ I
1'!101~-'1
fiI 0
c
! .8
c
)
!
I
i
J
I
I
)
RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING
Resource Conservation Commission
Chula Vista, California
6:30 p.m.
Monday, Apri1ll, 1994
Council Conference Room
City Hall Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order at 6:40 p.m. by
Chairman Kracha. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid called roll.
Present: Commissioners Hall, Kracha, Ghougassian, Johnson, and Bumscano. It was MSUC
(Johnson/Hall) to excuse Commissioner Myers from last meeting and also through the summer
until she finishes school; motion carried 5-0. It was MSUC (HalUBurrascano) to excuse
Guerreiro from the meeting of March 7 and April 11 due to his school exams; motion carried
5-0. It was MSUC (Hall/Burrascano) to excuse Johnson from the meeting of March 21 due to
vacation; motion carried 5-0. Kracha stated he will be on vacation May 2-June 10, 1994.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was MSUC (Johnson/Hall) to approve the minutes of the
meeting of March 7, 1994. The minutes of March 2 I could not be approved due to no quorum
present from that meeting. It was noted that the minutes of February 7, 1994 are still
unapproved.
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Used Motor Oil Grant Application - Michael Meacham explained the grant requirements
and how he is seeking to have some of the money charged from the oil to be returned to
the City. The $240,000 regional grant application is being done on behalf of Imperial
Beach, National City and Chula Visa. He will also ask assistance from schools and
businesses to educate the public on programs to recycle oil. The Nature Center currently
has these classes and will work with them on preserving the environment.
It was MSUC (HalUGhougassian) to recommend that Council approve the grant; motion
carried 5-0.
2. Review of Negative Ueclaration IS-94-10, Bonita Road Bicycle Lane: It ill nolc:d lI\iI,t IIle
lanes were included in the General Plan. Opposition to the negative declaration included
comments on the cost, excess traffic, and tI;1at underground utilities would need to be
relocated.
A motion was made by Ghougassian to reject the project as it is not economical to the
City; motion died due to lack of second.
A motion was made by Hall, seconded by Burrascano to accept the negative declaration;
motion carried 4-1, no: Ghougassian.
Another motion was made by Hall, seconded by Ghougassian that the project be denied
due to safety problems with traffic. Burrascano felt that the bicycle lane was the best
Resource Conservation Commission
Page 2
alternative for bikes. However, Hall and Ghougassian felt the danger existed for bikes to
be riding in the busy intersection too close to the freeway; motion failed 3-2, no:
Burrascano, Kracha.
A motion was made by Ghougassian, seconded by Hall to deny the project due to
unnecessary expense; motion failed 3-2, no: Burrascano, Kracha.
3. Review of Negative Declaration IS-94-14, European Parts Club, presented by Mr.
Martinez. After brief discussion, it was MSUC (GhougassianlBurrascano) to accept the
negative declaration; motion carried 5-0.
4. Review of Negative Declaration IS-94-19, Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA.
Information was relayed on the density transfer within the approved areas of EastLake
Greens, and exchange of property between Otay Ranch and EastLake.
It was MSUC (Burrascano/Hall) to accept the negative declaration; motion carried 5-0.
[Ghougassian left the meeting at 7:50 p.m.]
5. Environmental Health Coalition: Kracha was distressed that this item was sent to Council
before RCC saw the draft. He questioned how long in advance this was docketed to
council. Further, he wondered if there would be other surprises to expect from the
relationship between the Environmental Health Coalition and the Environmental Resource
Manager. Kracha commented on how parts of the packet appeared to be generated by the
City, however, it is on record that the information is already in effect in San Diego
County. The packet further pertains only to City programs and operations, and he thought
it should be a countywide program. Since too many questions were left unanswered, this
will be an agenda item again at the next meeting.
6. Historical Signs: Kracha again expressed his dissatisfaction that the City Council
appropriated funding of $3700 to the Cultural Arts Co;r.mission in support of its acti.vities
for the remainder of the fiscal year. Consequently, he was offended that in order to cut
its budget, the Council had removed the item of historical signs from RCC's budget with
the intention that the City Manager would find' alternative funding for the signs. However,
this has not been done to date, yet the Council appropriated other funds for another
Commission.
A motion made by Hall and seconded by Burrascano to take the excess and unspent monies
in RCC's current budget and designate it to a fund to pay for signs Jor the historical
buildings; vote: 2-2, no: Johnson, Kracha, The no vote was expressed because it does not
solve the City's problem nor the City Manager's obligation of finding alternative funding.
Kracha stated that the problem of the signs has been unresolved for over five years and
residents are still waiting for the signs.
Resource Conservation Commission
Page 3
It was suggested that a recommendation be made to the City Manager that it consider a
budget transfer and requirement funding of the signs. Additionally, as no other source of
alternative funds have been found, that this be reinstated as a line item into RCC's budget.
The RCC also seeks a commitment from the Council to purchase the balance of the signs
for designated historical buildings.
7. Environmentalist of the year award: no criteria for nomination was included in the agenda
packet. The Commission was informed that a presentation could be made at the
Beautification Award banquet on May 31, 1994. Since no nominations were made by this
date, nothing will be done for this year. It was suggested that criteria be developed for
nominations and that planning begin in a timely manner next year.
STAFF REPORT:
Doug Reid handed out information for the staff contact person on the issue papers.
CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS:
Kracha communicated his disappointment in the way RCC is going.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS:
Burrascano reported she heard back from Staff on the Landscape Manual and Brush
Management. Doug Reid said that staff members are willing to answer questions before
the Commission if requested.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned by Chairman Kracha at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
EXPRESS SECRETARIAL SERVICES
~~J
Barbara Taylor
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
&
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
18-94-19
Mitigated Negai."e Declaratio
h'/1~1'
PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/sPA IUtd the fonnation
of IUt Assessment District for various public improvements
PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay LIkes Road between EastLake Parkway IUtd HWlte
Parkway
PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastlake Development Company
CASE NO: IS-94-19
DATE: February 28, 1994
A. Proiect Setting
The project site locBted south of Otay LIkes Road between EastLake Parkway IUtd HWlte
Parkway IUtd this general vicinity (Eastlake and Otay Ranch) do not involve luty substantial
soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project.
The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is Iut air quality Don-attainment
basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling Wlit increase beuuse of the expansion in land
area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the
air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality.
..-
However, beuuse the increase in the projected Wlits is more than SO, compliance with the
City requirement for Iut Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, 1his less-than-
significant impact will be further reduced.
The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek IUtd Sah Creek
drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may neecl additional cumulative
capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boWldary but the
impacts of this project would not be signific,ant. These drainage coW'Ses do not enter any
potable water sources nor are they a significant source of luty groWld water. .
This property has been used for agricultural purposes for many decPdes IUtd is void of luty
significant vegetation or animal life. The project could affect rapWr habitats but Jiven the
limited acreage this is not significant.
There are various Itreets in the project area which have trlftic volumes tbat may result n
Idverse noise levels. Once precise pad elevations AiJativc to ItrCCt elevations arc known,
specific mitigation will be identified IUtd implemented. This residential project will not
resuh in luty significant sources of light or sJare. .
The project as proposed is consistent with the other Iow-medimn densities adjacent to and
in the vicinity of the project site and the population levels are consistent with the project
area.
Public facilities IUtd services includins transportation arc available and IIdequate to ~t~
the project site and vicinity. :;-",,_-=
~~
elf)' of chu" wlst. plaMlnll "apartmant em OF
..vlr_anta. re.lew netlon. 0ilJLA VISTA
The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant
paleontological resources. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and
any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non-
graded areas.
Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously
implemented.
.
B. Proiect Descrintion
Genera1 DeSCr1Dtjon
The project is an lI1Iendment to the adopted Eastlake 1 General Development Plan (GDP).
which includes EastLake Greens; anll1lendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan
(SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City
of Chula Vista. The lI1Iendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to
reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the
following two categories:
I. Amending the GDP/SPA to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General
Plan Amendment east of the' SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels
R-IO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units).
2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refinements with no
net increase of density.
3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake D) for the installation
of public facilities to serve the project.
Included is Table I, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which IIIJIIIDIrizes the
proposed residential changes.
Description of Land Swan Area Amendment
Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this lI1Iendment The
balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and EastIakc). which was
recently the subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be oovcrcd by . ICp8I'I1C
lI1Iendment The purpose of including the areas in this p"'pOSCd amendment ICp8I'I1CIy is
hecause they are logical expansions of Clisting parcels within die East1akc (mens SPA
plan. The parcels that arc expanded by the rcc:ent GPA inel\ldc PlI'CCls R-JO. R-20 and R-
23. Upon favorable .won, these areas are proposed to be azmcxed to the City of Quia
Vista. Following is . description of each of these parcels:
R-10: 'Ibc realignment of Onnge Avenue to the IOUth expanded
this parcel's bolDldary. Tbc8e expanded areas were dcsipatecl Low-
Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of the density
range (4.5 dulac) is being I"uposcd. The totaI increase for this
parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and J2 du in areas
previously indicated IS Onnge AvenuelFmurc Urban).
WK:,~17JU4
..,e2
~LE 1
...tLake Gre~ site Utilization Plan
zn.tiDv ...i4ent1al t.aD4 v_ 8tat18ti~
Parcel Density Acr.. 1'arget 1'arget
Number Ranae n.nsitv Unit.
R-1 0-5 19.7 2.7 54
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40
R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105
R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88
R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96
R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45
R-10 '5-15 27.9 6.0 ) 167
R-11 5-15 14.6 6.3 t2
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 '3
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84
R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214
R-18 5-15 t.' 8.8 87
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158
R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146
R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205
R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50
R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74
R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 aD
R-27* 25+ .., 4.5 40
R-2B. 25+ 1>>.1 4.!5 27
1'O'lAL 412.4 ac 2774 du
-%litera Deai9l'ation
.'
-.
~LE2
...tLak. Greens Site tJtilization Plan
Propo8e4 "'idential Land v.. statiatica
Parcel Density Acre. ~arqet ~arq.t :tncrea..(+)
Number Ranae I)@nRit.v tJnit.. ftaeraaaf!(-\
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0
R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0
R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0
R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 U 0
R-9* 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0
R-l0 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +7t
R-l1 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 '3 0
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2
R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214 0
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0
R-20 5-15 15.7 9.2 153 +11
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5
R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +,
R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 46 -4
R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4
R-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60. 0
R-27 0-5 8.' 4.9 44 +4
1t-28 !!-1!5 &.t 0..1. 10 ..~!
wnL 434.1 ae 6.6 2871 du +17
*lnteria Ded;naUon: parcel aubject t;o ~uture DA Aaendaant
to be conaietant with the General plan.
"
1-11-14
"
R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the
SDG&.E easement. The new area is computed at the mid-point of
the Low-Medium density range (4.5 du/ac). A reduction is proposed
for the parcel as a whole to reflect current planningfmarketing.
R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20. except that
no decrease in the density is proposed. A net inc:rease of 9 wits are
proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA.
A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels.
DescriDtion of Densitv Transfers
This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA bowdary to reflect
current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of wits (2774 du)
previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density 1ranSfers. Refer also to Table
2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land
Swap Areas.
Parcel Number
R-3
R-7
R-Il
R-14
R-15
R-20
R-22
R-24
R-25
R-27
R-28
TOTAL
DU Increase DU Decrease
+19 .
-5
-5
+2
-23
-20
-5
-4
+4
+4
ill
~2 ~2
DescriDtion of Assessment Dimict Work
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 COIISists of the
following:
1. Street improvements consisting of Jl'ading, base, pavina. auuer, IidewaJk, IIl'eet
lighting and landscaping within die following rightHIf-way:
L South Greensview Drive from CJubbouse Drive to Unit 6 cmrance (2.400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Partcway (3.400
L.F.. Phase 2).
e. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 enlrance to Silvcrado Drive (1,920
L.F.. Phase 3).
WPC'~I136.t4
.... 3
"
2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm
drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities,
telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable
state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive nom Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrancc (2,400
L.F., Phase 1),
b. South GreensView Drive nom Silvcrado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive nom Unit 6 entrancc to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
3. DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading, storm drain, base, paving,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting, landscaping and street
monumentation within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300
L.F., Phase 2).
4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and storm
drain improvements within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F.,
Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E casement (3,500 L.F.,
Phase 2).
Discretionarv Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area
1. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment
3. Modification to the Eastlske Greens Site Utilization Plan
4. Establishment of District 94-1
S. Annexation
6. Tentative Subdivision Map
7. Design Review
c. Comoatibi1itv with Zonin2 and Plans
The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an
amendment to the more lpCCific land use lCgu1ations of the EastDke Greens General
Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA).
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An iniiial ItUdy conducted by the City of Chula Villa (mcluding the lltached
Environmental Checklist Form) detc:nnined that the j)Coposed project could have one or
WI'C ':\HDNE\PINININC1-!7",.
PlF4
more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or
specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below
significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects
will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program which is attacbed as Attachment WA".
The following impacts are those that were determined to be potentially significant and are
required to be mitigated to a level below significant. A discussion of each of these
potentially significant but mitigatable impacts from the proposed project follows.
Acoustics
The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project
site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level.
E. MitilZation necessBTV to avoid silP1ificsnt effects
Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant
environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below
significsnt.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have
been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment W A").
At the time of consideration . of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review
Supplemcntal Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista
General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of
roadwBYs and residential development pads will be available. With this infonnation, it will
be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the App. opriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL).
These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout 1raffic forecast and must
validate thc achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Onranizations
City of Cbula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Enain='ing
Hal Rosenberg, &gince:ring
Bob Scnncu, Planning
Ken Larsen. Director of Building . Housing
Ccol Gave, Fire Marshal
Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada
Marty Schmidt, PIlks . Rec:rcation Dcpl
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
WI'C F~l7JU4 ha.5
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti
Cinti Land Planning
3625 Midway Dr., #292
San Diego, CA 92110
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Chula Vista Municipal Code
Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager,
EastLakeDeveIopment Co. regarding sewage generation in lewage basins,
improvements and fmancing
Letter dated February 7, 1994, DeMis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources
Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the Idequacy of drainage systems
Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlaefli, Vice President Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as
any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
lJ.-~1
ENVlRO AL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 5/93)
"
WPC F:'B~I7J6.94
..,. 6
Attachment A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MEASURE
At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or
Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation
Element Roadways. At that time, the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available.
With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate
forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65
exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
MONITORING REOUIRE~ENT
Prior to granting a tentative subdivision map or design review
approval, a noise study forecasting noise levels and the
appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an
acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required.
01-.
~
~
$ot
.....
......
.....
......\1...
.....
......
......
.....
......
.....
0$.2
05.3
I
,
$02
P.3
PO-I
M!A OF DENSnv 1aANSFER
.
ADDED TO II'A BOUNDARY
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
iC) APPLICANT: EastIake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
.' EASTLAKE GREENS
ADORE": toO Lu. Avuu. General Development Plan Amendment
ICALE: FILE NUMBER: and SPA Amendment
l ~RTB NO SCALE 18-94-19 ,
Case No. 15-94-19
APPENDIx I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Backlf'Ound
1. Name of Fi...yanent: 1I...<t1a1ce DevelODment Co.
2. Address and Phone Number of P''''p'''ICIIt: 900 Urle Ave.. Suite 100.
O1ula VistL CA 91913
3. Dale of QIeck1ist: Februarv 24. 1994
4. Name of Proposal: Eastlalce Greens GDPISPA Amendment
S. Initial Study Number: 15-94-J9
Environmental Impacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: m.~m
L Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructureS? C C .
b. Disruptions, disp1a.cements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? D . D
c. Clange in topography or ground SllIface
relief featureS? D . D
d. The destruction. covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical features? D D .
e. Any increase in wind or water uosion of
.oils. either on or off the lite? C . D
f. C1anges in deposition or uosion of beach
ands, or changes in Iiltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
. river or Itream or the bed of the ocean or
8IIY bay. inlet or lib? C D .
,. Exposure of people or .......)'UtY 10 poloJic
bIzIrds IIJch u earthquakes. .......1i1W. mud
alides. ground failure. or poou.. bazIrds? C D .
.
WI'C~CN- ",7
g.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards'!
.
o
o
Comments:
The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no fmding
of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized IIId more
specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City
of Chula Vista General Plan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR
(1985), Eastlake Greens SPA &. EastLake Trails Prezone &. Annexation FSEIR (1989), IIId
Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with
the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
2.
There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very
minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
XES MAYBE !ill
a.
Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality'!
.
o
o
b.
The creation of objectionable odors'!
o
.
o
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally'!
.
o
o
Comments:
The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would
result in an increase of 97 units within the Eastlake Greens SPA. The emissions
from the ttaffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant
when considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the
emissions from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant.
3.
Water. Will the Proposal result in:
ns MAYBE W
a.
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of Wa1cr movements, in either
marine or fresh waters']
o
.
o
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
IUnace runoffl
.
o
o
c.
Alterations to the course or flow or
flood waters'!
o
.
o
.... .
WPC F:\IIONEIPIAIINDIOII7J6....
"
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
aMration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature,
dissolved oxygen or tU1bidity?
Alteration of the dircc:Qon or rate of
flow of JrOIIIId waters?
OIange in the quantity of pound wl%crs.
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
c
c
.
c
.
c
f.
c
c
.
I.
h.
Substantial reduction in the lJt10unt of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
c
c
.
i
Exposure of people or propeny to water
related hazards such IS flooding or
tidaI waves?
c
c
.
Comments:
The project site" and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh wl%cr areas. flood
waters, water bodies. or known ground water. There will be a minor change in absorption
rate which will result in minor-Iess-than-significant change in runoff (see letter from Dennis
C. Bowling dated 2{7!94).
... Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: m NAYBE m
L Change in the diversity of ~es, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, Jl"lSs, crops. IIId Iquat:ic
plants)'? C C .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endanaered ipe'ies of plants? C C .
Co Introduction of DeW species of plants into
mto an area. or in a bmiez to die DOI'IIIIl
apJenisbment of aistinJ It*ies? C C .
cL RedIJCtioa in ICIUF of any IpicuJIma1
crop? C C .
Comments: '
The project me has been used for qricuhural ~ for de~s IIId portions Ire now
paded ind some areas have been developed (tnnSfer IIU). 'Ibis Fllerall1U is used IS
Raptor laritmy. however. with only a 22.7 acre inaease in SPA ~ this. not IiplficanL
.... ,
wpc~CN-
--
S. ADimal Life. Will die proposal result in: m )fA YBE .liQ
.. OIange in die divenity of species. or
Dumben of lilY species of lllimals (birds.
land animals including reptiles. fish IIId
lbellfish. benthic organisms or insects)? D D .
b. Reduction of die Dumbers of lilY unique.
nre or endang~ species of lllimals? C D .
e. Introduction of new species of animals
into III area. or result in . banier to
the migration or movement of animals? C C .
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? C C .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricu1turaJ purposes for decades IIId portions are now
Faded IIId some I1"CIS have been developed (tranSfer area). This aeneral area is used as
Raptor territoI)'. however. with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size, this is DOIIignificIllL
.. Increases in existing noise levels?
m. )lAYBE ~
DC.
6.
Noise. Will the proposal result in:
b.
Exposure of people to severe noise
levels?
D
.
C
Comments:
Traffic volumes on roadways in IIId adjacent to die project lite could inaeaIe ambient
Doise to III unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of . Trntative
Subdivision Map or Design Review,lUpplementa11COUStica1 reports wiD be prepared
for projects adjacent to Clula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At
Ibat time die precise elevation of roadways and raideZltill development pads. Wid1
this information it will be feasible to maD III accmate forecast of noise JeveJs and
die -t')"..priate mitiption IIIW\D'CS necessary to nduce DOise JeveJs IDd the
-w,v)l'~ mitigation measures lIeCe$"ry to mduce noise leu to III __~ 65
exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustica1 reports must be bued 011 the IateIt baiJdoat
traffic forecast IIICI must nJi"- the ad1ievemem of the 65 alaiCl' dBA (om.>
. ItIIIdard.
.'
~~CN_
.... 10
7.
LI&h1 and Glare. Will the proposal produce
DeW light or glare?
m. MAYBE 1:iQ
DC.
Comments:
This is primarily . residential project that will not produce any signjficant new light or glare.
If there are any unique lources proposed or estab1ishcd. they will be reJUlated through the
performance IWIdards in the Municipal Code.
8.
Land Ule. Will the I'IU.......&! result in .
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
m )SA YBE 1:iQ
D D .
Comments:
The proposed project is in . planned c:ommunity which is intemally consistent that
assures land use CXlmpatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical
boundaries (the SDG&E tranSmission lines and East Orange Avenue). The overall
external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay
Ranch. Olay Water District facilities and SR 125 alignmenL
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
m MAYBE 1:iQ
L
Increase in the rate of use of any naturaI
resources?
D
C
.
Comments:
There are no other natura! resources IUch IS land and gravel on lite which would be
impacted by the proposed project.
10. Risk or UpseL Will the proposal involve:
m )riA YBE 1:iQ
..
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil. pesticides. c:hemica1s or
ndiarlon) in the event of an accW-'1I or
upset conditions?
D
D
.
b.
Possible int...f......ce with an err......1Cy
response plan or an em...cney ev8C"IOti"'l
plan?
o
,0
.
Comments:
Given the nsidential cbarIcter or the project there wm be DO iDvoJo.ement or laazlrdous
materials above thIt typical of . ~.1 land 1ISe. Tbe project wiJl pluride Idequate.
circulation in the case of the Deed far an evacnMi()fl or NIpCIIIK pJan.
.'
....11
w.c~CN-
(
11. Population. Will the proposal &her the location
distribution, density, or growth raIe of the human
population or In area?
.m. MAYBE !ill
c
c
.
Comments:
The disttibution. density md growth of housing md population in Ibis project are COIIsisto:nt
with planning for Ibis aru.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
bousing. or crute . demand for additional
bousing?
.m. }.fA YBE 1m
c
c
.
Comments:
The disttibution. density Ind growth of housing md population in Ibis project are consistent
with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than crute housing demands in
this aru.
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
.m.l6AYBE m
L Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? C C .
b. Effects on existing parking facilities.
or demand for new parking? C C .
c. Substantial impact upon existing
1rInSp0nation systems? C C .
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? C C .
e. AlterItions to wl1erbome. nil or air
traffic? C C .
f. Jnc:rease in traffic: bazIrds to motor
whicles. bic:yclists or pedeltrians1 C C .
,. A "1IrJe project" ander the Conpstion
Manaaement Propm? (An equivalent of
2400 or more awnae daily whicJe trips
or 200 or more peIk-boar wbk:le trips). C C .
Comments:
The project will Dot result in my IisnifiClDt impact to .,. <-
memo from Harold Rosenbe:rg. Traffic EnJineer. dated 2121194. - IeIter from Andy
Sch1ad1i. Vice President, Urban S)'ItCIIIS Assocl-. dated 2118194).
1WI:...--CNm.J4 ....12
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a Deed for new or altered
~ 10VemmentaJseMces in any of the following areas:
m MAYBE :iQ
L Fire protection? See page 6 of Appendix m of the C C .
Jni1ia1 Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept.) and
16 Thresholds L Fire/EMS below.
b. Police protection? See comments in OIuIa Vista Police
Dept. Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recornmendacion
dated 2/4/94 and 16 'Ibresholds b. C C .
c. Schools? EastLake Development Co. bas made the East1ake
projects panicipate in Community Facilities Districts
in the SweetWater Union High School District. and the
Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate
school services in the area. C C .
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
The project will be ~uirtd to provide adequate
community and neighborhood parks to serve the
population of the project. See Initial Study,
Appendix m, Parks &. Recreation Dept.. page 7.
Also see 19 Recreation below. C C .
e. Libraries'? The City of Chula Vista cmrently operates
a library at the campus of the Eastlake High School
during the hours the school library is not in operation.
On a longer term basis, there is a requirement for a library
site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to
finance the facility. C C .
f. Maintenance of public facilities. including
roads? Thm will be no substantial or unique impact on
the maintenance of.I!U: public fIcility as a resuh of the
minimal increase in usage due to this project. C C .
I. Other JOvemmentIl Ien'ices? Other JOVG1IIIIeIUI1Ip11Cies
were notified and contICteCI cimini the Jnmal Study;
DO other potential impacts were identified. C ,C .
15. EDeru. Will the J'lUJIOI&! resuh in: m &m :iQ
L Use of substantiIJ lII......d of fuel or
energy'? C C .
.
WI'C~CN""'"
..,.13
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing so\1J'ce5 or energy, or require
the development of new SO\1J'ce5 of
energy?
c
D
.
Comments:
The project would result in a minor incrwe in energy requirements typical of a
primarily residential project. This win noc result in a subltantial use of fuel or IIICrJY
DOl' new JOUICe5 of energy.
16. Tbresbolds. Will the J'luyOSAl adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards'?
m liAYBE :iQ
C c .
Comments:
As described below, the proposed project does Dot edvasely impact lilY of the seven
Threshold Standards.
A. FirelEMS
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond
to ca1ls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in
75% of the cases. The City of OIuIa Vista has indir..~ that this threshold standard
win be met, since the nearest fire station is one mile away and would be associated
with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project win comply with this Threshold
Standard.
See Appendix m to the Initial Study. page 16.
B. Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1
ca1ls within 7 minutes or less IIId maintain an average response time to aU Priority
1 ca1ls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain 111 average response time to aD Priority 2 calls
of 7 minUtes or less. The ploposed project win comply with this Threshold Standard.
See c:omments in QuIa Vista Police DepaItrnent ~ I'IeWlltion UDh. Plan Review
Recommendation dated 2/4/94. '
c. Traffic
1bc 'lbRsboJd Stlndll'ds ""tuh~ that aU jptw.uons IIIISt ......,- . . Level of
Service (LOS) "C" or better, whh the nception that Level of Service (LOS) "I)" may
0CC1IJ' during the peak two hours of the day .1ipaUzed inteIsec:doas. Jnlenections
west of I-8OS are Dot to operate . . LOS below Ibeir 1987 LOS. No iDIerIection
may reach LOS "E" or "F' durinl the avenp Wef\o"'y peak hour. Jnte:necIions of
aneria1s with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The J'lu,.oted project
win comply with this Threshold Standard.
WI'C~CN""'"
..,. 14
"
The project win not result in lilY significll1t impact to trarISpOIWion/circulation/tnffic
(see !Demo from Harold Rosenberg. Tnffic Engineer, dated 2121194, and letter from
Andy Sch1aefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Ascnri....s, dated 2/18194).
D. parks/ReCreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks IIICI Recreation is 3 w:resIl Jm population. The
proposed project win comply with this Threshold Standard.
The project will be required to provide adequate community
mid ncighborhood parks to ltI'Ve the population of the project.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects win provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) II1d City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project win comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water ResO\lJ'ce5 Division,m Rick
Engineering. dated 2/7/94.; !Demo from Roger Daoust, Sr..Civil Engineer, dated
2123/94.
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes Dot exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Mastet Plan(s) and City Engineerina Standards. The proposed
project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from BNce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, Eastlake Development Co., dated
'2J9194; !Demo from Roger Daoust, Sr. CivU En&inecr, dated 'JI23/94.
G. Water
The Threshold Standards .~ that adequate sunae. uuanent, aDd tnnnnission
facilities ~ c:onsuucted conc:arrently with p1anDed powth IIICI that ... quality
atandards ~ not jeopardized durin, powth _ COIIIIIUCtion. The..uf *" project
will comply wish this Thrahotd StIDdard.
Applicants may also be required to participlte in wbIteve:r WIIrl ~on or ~
off.. 1"+1111 the City of Qwla Vista bas in eft'ec:t . die dine of IIaUdinI permit
issuance.
17. ButIWI Health. WJ11 the J'luposal resuh in:
m MAYBE m
L
Creation of any bea1th hazard or potential
IIea1th hazard (r,.1"Ai"l mental bea1th1
c
c
.
WI'C~CN""'"
,.1'
b.
Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
c
c
.
Comments:
The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard
or 111 exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in .1 above.
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: m MAYBE tiQ
L The obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or win the proposal
result in the c:reation of 111 aestheticaUy
offensive site open to public view? C C .
b. The destruction. or modification of a scenic route? C C .
Comments:
The project will not obstruct lilY public view or vistas, crute any demonstrable negative
aesthetic effect or, at this level of review, impact a scenic route.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in 111
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities?
m 1:fA YBE :iQ
c
c
.
Comments:
The project will be requirtd to meet the recreational needs of Us residents in accordance with
City park standards which include recreational facility standards.
20. Cultural Resources. m >>AYBE :iQ
L Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction or a prehistoric or
historic ~logicalsite? C C .
b. Will the proposal resuh in -'verse
physical or leSthetic effects to a
prdUstoric or historic buildina, atrueture, C 'C .
or object?
c. Does the J'loposal have the pOteOtW to
CIUSe a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic c:ulturIl values? C C .
d. Will the I" oposa1 restrict existing
zeligious or sacred uses within the
potential impact ma7 C C .
WI'C~CN""'" ... 16
e.
Is the area identified on the City's
General Plan EIR as 111 area of high
potential for archeological resO\lJ'ce5?
c
.
c
Comments :
See Section 5.2.3 (pg. S-3) of EIR.J6-4 (Scb: 86052803).
m ~YBE :iQ
21. Paleootoloeical Resources. Will the proposa1 resuh in the
alteration of or the destruction of paleontological
Jaources? .
.
c
c
Comments:
See Section 4.7 (pg. 4-75) of EIR-86-4 (Scb: 860522803).
22. Mandatory Fmdinp or Sipificance.
m MAYIIE M!
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the envirorunent, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels. threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community. reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
animal or eliminate important examples or the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
c
c
.
Comments:
As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any bioloJical resources II1d
therefore. would have no significant impact on any of these resources. Cultural resources
(prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitipted and no fuJther action is necessary.
b.
Does the project have the potential to achieve
shon-term 10als to the disadvantage of long-
term, environmentaJloals? (A Ibon-tam
impact on the environment is one which oc:c:un in
a relatively trid, definitive period of time,
while long-term impacts will endure well into the
future.)
c
c
.
Ct-""I'Its:
The p'ujlOSOd project c:cmform to the Qau1a Vista Genenl Plan IDd therefore, the poject
complies with the JonJ term loah of die City of Qau1a Vista for the site.
."
... 17
WI'C~CN""'"
c.
Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact two or
more separate resO\lJ'ce5 where the impact on
each resource is relatively small. but where the
effecl of the total of those impacts on the
environment is lignificant.)
c
c
.
Comments:
The project impacts are 10 limi!ed to preclude lilY lignificant cumulative impact. In the case
of air quality impacts. the increase of 97 units, or a maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the
existing, and approved units II1d ADT, the impact is minimal and less than lignificant. Also.
the site is void of lilY significant biological or c::uJtural resoarteS and paleontological resources
win be fully mitigated. "
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings. either directly or indi1ectly?
c
c
.
Comments:
At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Desiin Review, supplemental
acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to QuIa Vista General Plan
Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential
development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make anlCCUl'lte forecast of
noise levels II1d the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to 111 acceptable 6S exterior
dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast
and must validate the achievement of the 6S exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
,"
WI'C~CN""'"
"'11
"
Mitiption Measures
(To be completed by the Applicant)
I. as owner/owner in escrow'
&uc~ N. S<DI1I\J
SR. ?~n':1 ~. EJm7 Ad 7>Et/ GJ,
Print name
or
I. c:onsul1ant or agent'
~":""-...... .............. -_.
z /z.~ 11'f
Signature Date
Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Qeck one box only.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
C I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effecl in this case becl'n.e the mitigation
measures described on 111 attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION wID be prepared.
C I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effecl 011 the IItviroDment. and 111
ENVIRONMENT AI. IMPACT REPORT is required.
~~cICj<1
~ ~~.:..J(-{o. V)1I21J~ L
Environmrntal Review COordUWor . Dare
"'If ICtinI for a corporation. w-,"w ClplCity IIId company DIllIe.
,-
... 19
WI'C~CN'IJU'
Case No. -::r~- C14' I~
APPENDIX n
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(OIapter 1706, Statutes of 1990. AB 3158)
. 11 is hereby found thai this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, eilher
individually or c:umulatively on wildlife resources and thai a "Cenificate of Fee
Exemption" sha1l be prepared for this project.
11 is hereby found that this project could potentiaDy impact wiJdlife, individually or
cumulatively II1d thmfore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and
Game Code sha1l be paid to the County Clerk. ~_. ~e ~d
'l?'-e..;,'e";,s."",, ~~"'~. ~'R I\Cf'o ~I.D.~ G'\~
~,., ~~~~~~~~ 9\0.r-.
'-6? fi.;./(-fe'EJ~)
Environment.al Revi w Coordinator
~~'i"/'7 "
Date
.'
",20
Wtc~CN""'"
-
-
Case No. ,~-Cj<j-I'\
APPENDIX III
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CITY DATA SHEET
1
n.
m.
prrent Zoninlil on site: 't'c..
Nonh .
South I,
East "
West i
(~tr-..'":.~
.,
..
II
"
Does die project confcmn to the ~.~a aoninl'1-f:;;.::.~...t.ie~~
pmo,., PI" 100' '" ::'~~~ :"':"~~ - ~~\=~~~~~ ~f~~~
South .
East .;u,.." _ ~ ~(r"..'L -1.T-~-'1 .... A .. ~7:.J a -, Dc) /~
West ~ ';'''r: II " ~
jIJ--- " I ~~
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use D~'1-t1 d ~
Is the project area desiiTIated for conservation or open space or adiacent to an 8IU 10 desiJnl1ed?
---
~'---a' -.
Is the projeCllocated adjacent to lilY scenic routes? - ",,"')-
(If ,..~....... 0"..............,' .""" of...
;~Z~~'~I~.IdJ-.
~hools '
If the proposed project is residential, please complete die followina:
.,.~",c
IV.
UDlts 0IDeraIiDI GeoeraLed
~ ~ IiImUm1 ~ .1Jt:ttn ~
,a.-t~ ~J..J*"~' - - 117 .30 2,"
JIIIIIor HiJh ~aI..;~ .,. :It ~ V
IIaIar HiP e... tt L- "7 . .10 I 0
yJL'~7! ;~~!J ~~ 1,.~~~11
..1J- I._~
Dn=r oflianrun, or Rmiruen~ve
;:/!}.~/'t1
-
__.___ ..__~~I~....", IID..ltIl.ca..r,IIZ""
",1
.
APPUCATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN 15 FOLDED TO FIT wro AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
~~~~~
)X>pSL~t..'7<I_ .
-.~.Ilei:ei. ..' 'plNo.'~
Patek'd.~
,ACcepted by ..t)~
;project No. .FA- ,~)
City of ~ula Vista ~.. "t!9..~.~. .' .0 '.
Application Form'tJP No ...... .". "
BACKGROUND D_I...... .~ No; '. ;
.':';:'.:; ,.::'\:.-::~""._'-.::..::_~:::~:"
1. ProjectT1tle Eastlake Greens GDP!SPA Amendment ......"....""
2. . Project Location (Street address a-descripdon)East of SR-125, North of.
Orange Ave, South of Otay Lakes Rd.! ~el.graph canyon RO.,
. and West of Hunte Parkway.
INITIAL STUDY
A.
Assessors Book. Page" Parcel No. NA
3. Brief Project Description ~he project i8 a transfer of D.V. within the .
existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) anO an expans~on of
the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 dU).Refer to attached Project Descril
4. Name of Applicant Eastlake Development Company
Address 900 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax' 421 ~1 ~30 Phone 421 -01 27
City Chula Vista. State CA Zip 91913
5. Name of Preparer/Agent Gary CinU - CinU Land Planning
Address 3625 Midway Dr., '292 Fax' 223-5108 Pbone 223-7408.
City San Diego State CA Zip 9211'0
Relation to Applicant Land planning Consultant
6. Indicate aU pennits or approvals and enclosures or doc..1.tCAts reqaired by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
L Permits or approvals requirtd.
_ 0eDeraI Plan AmeDdmcnt
~ 1tIzcDeIPrezone .
_ 0ndiD& Pamit
_ Taa&a1ivc hrccI Map
_ SiIc Plan I: Arch. Review
.___SpeciaI Ute Pamit
1 Deslp RevIew Applicalioo
:K TelltaUYC Bubel. Map .
_1.ecIeveJopDeDt IopDt:y OPA
_1tocIevekv'-' Aptt;y DDA
_Public Project
.:f.- ~..fq.
_ Spccirlc Plan
. Caldilicllal Use Pamit
-
_ VariaDce
.........1 DcvcIOpncnt
X Qbcr l'amit CliP
~
If project is a General Plan Amendment mdlor 1UCIOe, pleae indic:IIe the c::bInp ill deIIpIdon from
to
..
b.
_ 0racIiD1 Plan
_ Parcel Map "
Precise Plan
= SpecU"1C Plan
_ TraffIC Impact Rcpon
_ Haiardous Waste All
Enclosures or documerus (as required by the Environmental RevIew Coordinator).
_Arcb. Elevations _H)401o&ical Study
_ LancIsaIpt' Plans BioIoJIcal Study .
_ Tcata1iYC Bubel..Map = Arc:bIeoIoJIcaI Study
I___""omcat PIIIIs Nolle All "1eOI
_-.'t" _
_ Soils Report _ OIlIer IopDt:y Parmlt
'IICIII _GcoI-.....cal Report ~0Iber project De81?r1pU
.
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1.
a.
. 161.4 (amend. area)
Land Area: square footage or ~e .e5~ 2 'SPA area)
If land area to be dedicated, sWc acruge II:Id purpose.
b. Does the project involve the construction of neW buiJdinp, or will eJdstin& Itruc:ture be
vtm,..A? Yes, see proj ect Description.
.
2. Comple&e this leclion. if project is residential or mixed use.
L
Type of development;...... SinlJe Family _ Two Family --.: Muki Family
_ Townhouse _ Coodominiwn . .
Total nwnber of ItnIc:tures 2871 residential du permi ttted
~umbclghlof~ varies per P.C. District Regulations
Number of Units: 1 bedroom ..liA-.
2 bedroom .J:iA..
3 bedroom '.J:iA..
~ bedroom ..Ii.L
Total Units Wl.
Gross density (DU/totaJ aaes) ~..
Net density (DU/total acres minillany dedication) 6.6
Esdma1cd project population to be determined
Estimated sale or rentaJ price nnje to be determined
Square footage of IINcture to be determined ' .
Percent of lot coverage by bui1dinp or stnII:IUres per P .C: Regulations
Number of on-cite JWkini sp.ces to be provided oer P.C. Requlations
Percent of site in road and paved surface t.o be determined
Complete this section if project is commercial or .indlmrilJ or mixed _ .
L Type(s) of land use .
b, fJoor ~ Hci&fu of ICnICIWa(s)
Co Type" of CiIJQIIrUCdoa used In Ibc IUUCCurc
e.
f.
,.
h-
L
j.
k.
L
x
d.
Co
f.
I.
b.
c.
d.
. ,
Dac:ribe ~ 8CCeU points ID die ItI'UeIures IIId die orJ.-.I.d:otl IO~, pmpenies
Ud IInets .
Number of 0Hite partin''P''-'' provided
EstimIIecf DUmber of emplo,,-s per Ihift
Number of Ihifts Total
Estimated Dumber of CUltomell (per day) IIId basis of lltimate
. o. '. .
.,. =-'~-_.~...............,_. .--....- -..
- .. - .
. , ..
HOW'I of operation
Type of exterior lighting
'x.. . . Jl project is other th~ ftlFltt,..ft';.'. commerciaJ or 1Dd~ ~lete this -=00.
, L Type of project ,
.
h.
i
j:
.k.
L
Estimated number of deliveries per day
Estimated range of service area II1d basis of estimate
Typele.xtcnt.of opemions Dot in enclosed buildings
b. Type of r-iliries provided
c. Square feet of enclosed IIrUC:tUres
d. Height of ItNCtUre(s) . Dwwnum
e. Ultimate OCCUpll1cy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces 10 be provided
B. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional PT?ject dlaraaeristic:s
.
..
C. PR01EC:T CHARACTERISTICS
1.
Will the project be required to obtain a pc:nnit through the Air PoDution Coacrol District (~)?
No.
Is ~)' type of pading or. ~VItion of die propctt)' _ti.r;.rerr1 y~ ba..~ on future
Jl ., "'-fill . '. . tta.l...
,es, comPlete ~ 0 0WUIg:
L ExcIudinJ hnChcs to be bIcI:fU1od. bow I11III)' .cubic: ,.rds or eIItb ~ lie acavated7
NA
How IIIIIIY cubic yards of fill wiD'be placed? IQ
. .
How much .. (sq. It. or 1CIeI) will be JI'Ided?
~ wDllIe the: ~ depcb of au au.
. Avaap depcb.of cut itA
MWmam,depchOffill itA
Avaap depth offiU MA
2.
b.
Co.
d.
itA
.
,.
. ~l.J~ ~D~02''''''' CIW 1OaIJ)cw. llZUJ)
...'
I
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are pan of the proposed project and the type of
energy used (air conditioning. electrical appliance, beating equipment, etc.)
Nn~~1 r_~id~ntial enerav use.
<t. I"'''o:''~ Ihe amount of aaturaJ open space that is pan of Jbe project (sq. fL or ecres)
None.
5.. If the project will raWr in any employment opponunities cIcscn"be Ihe IIIture and C)'pe of these
. jobs. Construction related 'jobs.
".
6. Will hi&hJy flammable or potentially uplosive materials or IU~ -be used or ItOred within
the project site? NA
7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, win be pncrmcd by the project? None in
exc~ss of those addressed in previousEIR.
II. Describe Of an)') off-liteimprovemeats no<icm')' 10 imp~ die project, and Ibeir points of
. a:c:ess or c:onncction to Ihe pfoject she. Improvements include but DOt limited 10 die follo~ing:
DeW streets; ItIeet ~g; exta\sion of ps, eleCtric. IDd ICWeI' Jines; cut IIId fill &lopes; IIId
pedtsaian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of ~hoae previouslY .
identifiec:! for EastLake Greens. Iref@T ot.t) ~A.+r.Ak~ l:or__nal"""p).
D. mgumON 9UNVIRONMENTAL SE'ITING
1. . Geolorv
Has a aeolOi)' lCUdy been conduc:aed Go the fliupe1t)'7 Ye., 8.. ...tlake Greens EIR.
. (If yes, please attach)
Has a lOils nport on the project lite ... 1IIIde? Yes. .ee Z..tlake Gre.n. EIR.
(If yes, please attach)
2. .Ihdmlm
. Ale any of Ihe followina fearwes ."MerIt on or adjaceat 10 the lite?
(If )'C$, uplain in detail)
L. II Ihere any surface evideace of aliha110w JrDUnd Watet aab1e? .0.'
,~
1WKf' J~ .~~t_._mILlJnD.al\.......U'rI!"'!
---...-
b.
Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
In creviously approved facilities.
Does runoff from the project site drain direaJy in to or toward a domestic Wltelsupply,
lake, reservoir or bay? No.
Could drainaae from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? Potential
exists, but would be mitigated by conditions to tuture T.T. map
besaibe all drainaae facilities to be provided and their location. '1'0 b& determined
future submittals and reviously approved tract map.
c.
d.
e,
3. ~
'L Are there lilY DOise ICIUI'CCI in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
No. Future arterials may impact 80me areas.
b. Will noise from the project impact lilY switive receptors (hospitals, lChools, single-
family residences)? No.
4. .IIiolo2Y
L Does the site involve"any Coasta1 Slie Saub veselltion? No.
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural ~e? No.
C. If yes, bas a biologicaJsurvcy been coNflicted 011 ihc property?
Yes x. No (Please .ttadl. c:opy,)Refer to previous EIR.
d. Describe aU trees and ve,ewion on the site. Indicate Jocarion, beiihl, diameter, II1d
species of trees, II1d which (if lilY) will be removed by the project. ..s~ te is .emi-
developed with remnants of previous dry farming cattle
grazing on ,the remainder,
5. fast Use of the Land
L Are there Illy known historical or IIChcologicall'ClOUl'Cellc ,'od 011 or near the project
site? No.
b, . Are tbcrc 1/'1)' known paleontological niources? No .
Co Have there been any hazardous IIIIIeriaIs disposed 01 or Ibnd 011 III: near the project site?
No.
d~ What was the Janel IRviously used fofI Dry farming/cattle vrazing
"
WPc-~~02I"".,'~_.J)~ 1m..JI
D._ C
6. CUTTen! Land Use
L Describe all structures II1d land uses currently existing on the projeclsite.
-.See answer below..
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existin, on adjacent propeny.
North Eastlake Business Center'
S~ Vacant Otay Ranch - Future development
Ean Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoo~s
1V~ Eastlake High School/Community Park an~ Future aeve!opmer
~ S~~ ,
L Are there lilY reskIcnts on ~fe on parcll:o, ia~m:;~ -'~ :~i f~:rease
b. Are thue Illy CUrrent employmcot opportllnitie$ on site? No.
If 10. how many and what type?
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the PI~project.
Sites have been fully .valuate~ in Eastlake Greens SPA EIR an~
recent General Plan Amendment EIR for Lan~ Swap areas.
See also attache~ Project Description for add1t10na! aa~a.
.
-.Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half
of EastLake Green~. Parcels propo.e~ for amen~-
ment with existing structures are only being
amen~ed to reflect existing con~itions with no
increase in units.
I
,.
1ifOF.l-~UI""'''CW_''icw.11lZUJ1
...'
E. CERTIFlCATlON
L as OWfII:t/ow=z in escrow.
.AK~1A~@ '~velonment Company
~ruce Sloan. Proiect Manager
Print _
or
L c:onsuhant or agent.
Print name
HEREBY AfFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and inronnation herein c:cntained are in aD
ftSpedS true aDd correct and that all known information concemin. the project and its IeItina bas been
included in this application for an Initlal Study of possible environmental impact and lilY enclosures for
attachments thereto.
.
.
~
0wnerJ0wner in Escrow Signature
or
~ or Apnt SipaNre
i / I) / 'It!
, .
Date
-If acting for a coq)oration, include capacity IIId company DIllIe.
-......--- .....----.-. ..--.... .--.-.... ..--.
"_'7 .
INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENT
Name or Applicant Eastlake Development Company
~ gOO' Lane Ave" Ste. lUU
Cil)': Chub Vista SWe CA
Name ol AIIhorized ReprcIa\&IIIive fahipullOry): Jlru~e Sloan
Addn::ss: 000 '..n~ Av~ . ~~@ 1 no
City . ,.......,.. ".. e+-. Slate CA
Apt:cmaIt Date:
Deposit Amount $ 7 5 0 . 00
.
Pbone 421-0127
Zip 91913
Pbonc .."_n127
ZIp 91913
'Ibis Ap'cement rA,.6w,-"' bee_MIl the Cit)' olCllula Villa. a c:IIar1cted aaanlcipll c:orpcntion rat"
_ the fCII'CIIIIIIOd applicant lor ClInl1ia! Stud)' rAw'~ e&ctive . ollhe A&nenat Dille.. bUI aiIcM,
Ii IIIIde with ref~ 10 Ihe folJowinl facts:
Whereas, die AppIiC:lJlt has applied 10 the City fCl' an initial Stud)' ollhe type afcnrel~&O.....s rlnitial
Study' which die Cit)' has required 10 be obtained as a concIition 10 pamiUinl the Appl~ 10 de\ICIop a p&\I'Cel
or p,,:~~ It: and,
Whereas, the City wiD Incur upenses In order 10 pi ocus aid Inl1ia! Stud)' tbrou&b !be ftrious depanments
and belen the various boIIrds and commissions or the City ("PI.....'I Seniccs"): II\c1,
Whereas, the purpose or &his apement is 10 Idmbune the City ICI' aD GpenIeI II wDI incur ill connection
with pnMdinl the Proc:essinl Services;
Now. thcn:fDR, the p:IItics do bcreb)' ape. In acIuInle ICI' the muIIW pramilelllnin CIIIIIIIIincc1, as
follows:
L Applicant', Dul)' to PI)'.
1be Applicanl Iha1I pi)' all or the City', apeIIIC$ iIIc.../ed In povidina h: , I oJ Service aeIaIed 10
appIicaru'.lnitial SlIId)',lncIudinl all of die City's direct and CMItIcad ClDlllIIIaIed thereao. 11Iis duty or
!be Applicant shall be referred 10 berein as the .Applicant'. Duty 10 PI)'..
A. Applicant's Deposit Dul)'
As p:II'tiaI perf_ or the AppI;""", Duty 10 Pay, 6e ~-.t'1IIaD deposit !be _t
.rcnrelClalCed rDeposi!1.
1. ne City atmII clllqe III lawful IIipenaes '" ,ed II pmidin. ........., Sa.icU
. apinst die Aw'~'. DeposIL U,ICIer Ibe ClDlldusioa 01 prD : ' _,Ibe App1icant's
1aItiaI Stud)', CI)' portion or !be DeposIt NIIIDI!Is. lite City IIIalJ .... aaId bIIance 10 the
Applicant wiIIIouI ..... ~ U. tbiaa lite ,. , _I ol... ~._', 1aItial
Stud)'. lite IIIIOUIII or Ibc DeposIt \000.. ~ CI' II 1M..' I ,Uy 1IkeI)' 10 ~
..IIPUII~ In die opinion or die City,lpOIIlllldceor_ bylbe Cty,Ibe W-'IIIhaII
forthwith .......ide IIICh 8ddi1ionll dIpoIit . lie 01)' IlIaD ~I"" . J .Iab!)'
r J 10 awItimIe 10 .......ide "" ' 1 Sa,' [ I J ". duty or ... AppI~ 10
1nItiaII)' depaIit and 10 JUppIemeaI laid depoIIt . IIenift IIqUIred IlIaD be bowD . the
.Applicfqt', DeposIt Duty..
D. City', Duty
"
ne CiIy IhaII. IIpOIIdIe eanditioll _die AwJicant II IIOC In InIdI fIl die AppIicanI', Duty 10 Pay CI' the
Applicant'. Deposit Dut)', _ aood IaIIh 10 .......iIk II<< : ''II aervIces ill relation 10 the ~iePII" JnltiaI
SlIIcIy application. .
A. The City sh:Ill h:>ve no ~bility hereunder 10 \he Applicant for \he failure 10 process \he Applicant's
lnilial Study application, or for failure 10 process the AppIic:anI's IAiLial SlUdy wilhin \he time
fnIme requesled by \he AppIicaN or aUmaled by \he CU)'.
B. B)' cxer:ulion or Ibis qreemc:n1. the Applicantlhal1 ~ 110 ri,hllO direct or CIIherwi& influence
Ibe condUCI of the IniIiaI Sludy for which Ibe IIIPlicant Ills IppIie4. The City IhaI1 '* Its
~on ill cvallIIIin, \he Aw'~'.1niIiaI Scud)' lW'w.,tiQoo ~ nprd 10 !be AIJpIicanI's
pomise 10 JIll)' for the !\--sL., Savk:cc. or iii ~~1ooI 01 !be ~
m. Jtemedies
A.
$usp-,1ooI of ~
.. .,"1;, IooIII:i all other riahu and nmecIia wIIiI;b !be CIIy IhaI1 CIIbcrwiIt ~ . law or equll)',
Cbe City Ills the riahllO ,...~ M4Ior wiIbboId the .. '", 01 the IaiIIaI.SIUdy which b the
aubject ~cr or Ibis A&reemenL . well . the Initial SIudy wbidllU)' be the aubject IIW\er of
111)' other Ptnnk which Applicant Ills Wen the City.
Civil CoUec:tion
In addition 10 all oCher ri,hls and remedies ",bich the 01)' aIWJ 0CherwiIe ~ all law or eqult)',
the Cit)' has \he ri,hllO coUec:t alllUIIIS which are or II1II)' ~.'" due IIeraIndct by eiviI action,
and upon institulin& litiplion 10 collect lime, the prevaiIina part)' IbalI be IIIIitJed to IIIIOIUIble
&IIOme)". fces bad costs.
"
B.
IV. MiIcd1aneous
A. Notices
AllIlOlices. dI:mancIs or requau p'OVide4 for or penniaed 10 be ,Iwn pnanllO IhiI Apemenl
IIIIISt be in writin,. AllIlOlices. clan:lnds and requesls 10 be IellIIO ..)' party aIWJ be deemed 10
III~ been poperI)' ,i~ or ~ II penonaIl)' ~ or dcposilOd in the UIIiIed SIIIcI mail,
~ m j 10 auch paI1)'. JX)SIaF pqJai4. re&is\eRd or c.tICied. willi num ..eIpt nquesIe4. at
Ibe acIdreaes identified adjac:catlO the ai&NIIIInII of die parties...... r "I'Ie!
B. ~'UwN~~
Tbis Aifotmall nu be IOwancd by 8l1li CXIIIIIIIIed ill acw.dwa willi die Laws oflbe Swe or
CaliConUa. Ally action ariain,lIIIdu or nIaIin& 10 IhIs Apc.I,"'-oIlhaI1 be IIrouaht only ill the
federal or II:IIC couns IocaIed ill San DIe,o CoImI)', Stale of CaliComia, and If tIPP''''-hle, the City
01 CluIa villi.. or . dole Ihcreso . pDIIIDC. V_ for .. III~ - '. and pIIf~
1IaeuncIcr,IhaI1 be the City d QauIa VialL . .
Co Mulliple SipIIIaries
, .
It Ihcn are lIIuldple IiplllDlica 10 IhIs ...__ CII tdIaIf 01 AppNc:an1... of.alipataria
tIaaII be joiIIIIy 8l1li awnUy liable ~ Ibe ,n..- d Aw"--t'. duIiea .... III ~
D. IipllOl)' AaIhonI)'
The aipalory 10 Ibis ... ......eN hereby WMIIIII and ...... fIIIlhat .. II die duly cleliJllllDd qent
for the Applicant and Ills been duly authGrizad by die AppIicanllO UecuIC IhIs ~ 011
behalf or die ApplicanL SianaIory aIWJ be pcnonaIty liable far Awlicant'. Duty 10 Pay IIId
AppIw-at". Duty 10 Dcpoait iIIlbe ~ ..l1li II1II ....1IIIhorized 10 .~ Ibis Aw-ADI by
Ibe Appticllu.
1QQ:I.J-"'-'" .~tnl..&...~ a.c tallest"" IIIIIM....'
. PueO
E. Hold Hannlcss
Applic:anllhall defend, 1ndc:mn1!)' and bold barmlea!he City, ill cIecIed and appointed ofIiccn
II1d employees, from and apinsI all claims for damales. lability, COlI and apeIIIe (inc1u4ing
wiIhout limiwion attorne)'S' fees) arisinl OUI of jn '~I AppIlcant'.1IIiIiII Stud)',8Icept onI)'
lor Ibose cl:Wns Irisin, from !he IDle IIC&Ii.ence or IDle wWluJ CO"C,IIOC' of !be City,IIIcurred by
the City, ill oIT'an, qcnlS, or emp10yccs In defeadin& apinsllIICh claims. QcIher !he ame
prococd 10 judpmenl or DOL Funher,!be AppI;-'II, at ill OWl! _pena. IIIalI. IpOII wrillen
nquest by !he City, defend 111)' auch lUll or action lIIOa.hl aplnst the Ck1,1Is omc:m. aaenlS,
or employees. Applicant'. iDdemDIlcaIian of the Cty IbaI1I1e limlled by III)' prior or .aequenl
*daration by the Applicant. '
F. AdminiIIraIive 0aimI ~ and J'nx:eduru.
No IUIt or IIbIntionlhaIllIe lIIOaaht ariIInl oai of 1hiI_~_4. apInsI die Ciry IiiIea a claim
lias fim been pru::nted In writinl and rale.d with !he City of 0wII Villa and 8CICd upon by !he
City of Ollila Villain cc:ordance with !he poocecIura let fonh ill ChapCcr 1.34 of !he OI1lIa Villa
Mllllicip:ll Code, as ame ma)' from lime 10 lime lie amendccl.. !he p.".isions of which are
iloCOIpOGIted b)' !he reference as If (1111)' ICI fonh hcnin, and IUCh p('1;,.iellIId proceduru ued by
!he City In !he Implementation ~ same. Upon requeII by !he City, die Applicant IhaII meet and
confer In locxI fallh with !he Oty for !he .-...- of ..vInllll)' diIput.e O\'IT !be ImnS of Ihis
Ap'eeme/IL
Now, there!CR. !he panics herao,l\avlnl read and andenIood !he Ia'IIII and conditionI of ibis qreement,
do IIc:reby upress thdr COIIIaIIIo !he IennS hereof by ICUinI thdr IIand IIereIo l1li the dale .. fonh .sjacenI1hereIo.
City
City 0( Chub V"II\:I
276 Founh Avenue
=~;w-
DIIed: 1/ 11/"'1 .
, I
Awl;"",,! (or authorized representative)
Bruce Sloan, Project Mqr.
Eastlake Development Company
8y:
8y:
IUd:
.
,-
.
.)
...
5.
6.
"
THE CfIY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
5'.'-1 of disclOSlll'e of c:cnain OWDe:Sbip iIIIeresu, pI)'DIeIIts, or c:ampaian COIItn"butioDs, OIl alIlIIIIIen which
wW require cIiscreIioDaIy 1CIi01l 011 !be pan or !be Ciry CouDcil,l'IazmiD& C'''......;..iOl1, &lid III 0Iher official bodiC$.
1bc roUowiD& iDrOrmaU01I must be disclosed:
I.
Ust tile ...Des or III perIODS !live a _"";.1 iDIcrat ill tile ~, Le.. _r, ~lrICIor,
UeriallUppliu.
R~~t1Ake D@vel~Dment Company
2.
If 811)' penaIIldem1fiecI pum&lDllO (I) Ibcm Is a -a-04ioa or .._IhIp, lilt Ibc _ or III
iDdivi4111Ia owID& more 1IwI105 or Ibc IbIrea ill Ibc -a-.A... or 0WIIiD& 811)' ...c....AIp iDterest ill
Ibc parmenhip.
.'"r t: ~n~wP 1 1
3.
If lilY penoII idc:Dtified pumllllllO (I) above II DOJI1II'Ofjr CIIJ~I_iOD or a trust, iIsIlbc _ of lilY
penoII Kn'iD& as direaor or !be _-profil orpIIizatioa or II InIIIce or bcDcf'1CiIIy or InIIIce or !be U\ISt.
'-1!t.
Have YOII hid more IIwI S250 wonh or bull-. .,...--'Id willi 811)' -'- of Ibc CiIy mtr, Boards,
Commissions, CommIuees &lid CouDciI wiIhiD !be past twelve 1DOTI1hs?
No
,
Please ideDtify IIch &lid every penoII.. iDcIudiD& lilY ..mts, employees, 0IIIIIIIhaIIIs or ..... F codenl
CIODIJ'ICtOIl who YOII!IIve auiJDed to repraeDI )'0\1 before Ibc City ill ibis lIIIItu.
~nh SAntos. Kent Aden. Bruce Sloan, Katy Wright
Have youlDdlor )'OIIf otficm or ..ems, ill Ibc I&IJ'IIIIC, aIIribuIed _ dIaD 11,000 10 a CouDcI!
~!""f ill tile cumIII or ........;'!I ..-'- period? Y. I ) No Ie) If,., De wIIIdI ~1
-'-(I): .
............., -.Wi," · ....~~.....joIoI_ .......,.......,"J . . _. . _.'
.......,.~ ...........__.....-".,....-".. . t ~,............... . .'... .""'poap
. .. . ........
fIIOIE: ~..... ......
DIre:
I))
~
Bruce &loan, 'roJect Manager
.
...tlake Develooment campany
PriDI or type ... of DIInCIOr/appliCIIIl
,
,
YS-S'7/
Case No.;p;-'l'-l-f"t
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
1 prainS2e
.
D.
~~I~lt
A. ... the J'TOjeclsite within a flood plain? jJt>.
If SO,lt&Ie which F'EMA fJoodway Frequency Boundary. ~A .
It What is the location and description of existing on-site drainqe faci1;~s'l~"''''''' #~ ~
7P ~HM.~..AJ,Jl) CITY 1IItbatA...."..I '-.a. tul!!"........ ,,.. cyc...r~
C. Are they adequate to serve the project? IJ~.
If not, please explain briefly. ~'1'"~/.... ~,t:I~ ~..,d~1Il. IMP.hAn.....~ W,LL.
~ I?".~/#~D WIIIMJ ~I AA...AJ!f'...,.,- ,."./~ 1I>C 6
D. What is the location II1d description of existing off-site drainqe-facilities? ..,.., ~"'_.. PIo/
"-.J;.AJ'r',-w r---6"~ ~&%:. 'A..IV~ ~~~ .4.NJ:J c..Lr ,....I6&U'
I r
E. Are they adequate to serve the project'? /oJO.
If not, please explain briefly. .1'':/'''''''''''(., IMP1/U;t/"...~. f'r"ft:. MAY -- AIE"--~ Itt
-
IN -niE. ~_,-: ~-.J AaJD "'''_'r ,..#~~ ~^,c. AS ....."I!l -..-..,.,-
~L..UA' .
1ranmO!'!3tion AIJ NA~ on> """~ jfJ,t.FI",t:. s:rz.r:,y Rp. 'RI! ~ &~W- ~
SPA E.tR..WIU.-6 IU(?JIUl>(Y'Y- IH~~~ *' TlW'f='/c:o. SF"" ~"'T'bu fIllM
A, What roads provide primary access to the project? ~
.tnl ~
B. What is the estimated number of one-way auto uips to be pnerated by the project (per day)? SfPI.) .
Co What are the AVer&Je Daily TraffIC (A.D.T,) vtWnw: 011 _.pimIry ICCCII JDIdI before II1d
after project completion'
Sueet Name Before Af.wz
Do any of these volumes r-If the City'. Leve1-of-Savk:e (L0.5.) "C" desiIn ADT
volume'? If yes, please apecify.
,.
__~_ .___ __ ..__.____.__ _~ ._..".AJ .8'WI.....\
..,.2
Y$-5'f1 .
Case No.JY;-qt./-ft:I
If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "COO design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly.
. D. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project?
If not, please explain briefly.
E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at inIaIectiona adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site?
If so, identify: Location
Cumulative L.O.S.
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Conlestion Manqement Propm? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). If yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TlA) will be required. In this case the TlA will
have to demonstrate that the project will not create 111 unmitigatable adverse impact, or that
aU related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-silnif'lClI1ce.
Yes No
The following questions apply if a TraffIC Impact AnaJysis is not required.
G. Is traffic mitigation ~uirtd to ftoduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of
the proposed project? Yes No
If yes, please describe.
H. Is the project ~t with the aUeria established in the City's ~ Pbasinl Plan,
Genera] Plan Traff'1C Element, and aU other pertinent tnmc ......" Please ......IC&. any
other traff"1C impact "....;.., for roadway -amenu that -y be ~ed by the "oposed
project.
L
J.
Is a traffIC stUdy required?
Is thm lilY dedication required?
If so;please specify.
Yes
No
~mfl~.lal.n)...,,-.n)
..,.,
. .
YS-9t1
Case No. I$ .qlof-{'f
K. Is thm lilY street widening required?
If 10, please ~cify.
L. Are there lilY other IIreet improvements requirtd?
If so, please specify the pnerallI&IUre of die Decen'l7)' "I"u~,
M. Will the project and related public improvements provide IIDs!lCIory traffic leJ'Vice for
existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions'1 (please provide a ~f
explanation).
m.
hil1
IV.
A. Are there lilY II1ticipated advene leotechnica1 conditions on the-project lite? I.JlJKJJDw..! ,
B. If yes, specify these conditions.l::1/~... .
C. Is a Soils Repon necessary? y,: ~ IE.)( f S-riAl r. SDI' A i'~T!O MlJ s-r- -- I Jt:DI.~
JrfJ~/t1Il- AMfi.(~ 7TJ ItJc.uJt:Ie "nfe N'ts..s
~fJ..A. ~~~~ e.^~r:>n>~ E;<IST"INM,
~e"P &PA. ,
A. What is the average natural slope of the site?
B. What is the muimum natural slope of the site?
v.
&iR
Are there lilY uaffic-related noise levels impactinl the site that arc siJnificant enouJb to justify that
. noise analysis be requirtd of the applicant?/MJ/U.JI'J.....,. NJ. Au.....II">Lo.,.'r "17!> T6# ~.It
~/~ .lJoI$e ~V$IS WI'L liE.. ~fRef>.
VL Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (ICWG) waste wiD be ...._..aed by die ...~ ....jec:t per da'/l
SoJid 2.3-z'.> ~InJ~ .....~ nAY AIM" ~~ IEltf*"'....." ~~u_b.~ CPA.
lJquid.7~n -'1'''.110.(6 _..4 7:l4~~'~'S 1!!hlJ~) 6w:. 'f1fE mtl.nl". A-..'-.llFA.
What is die kalion IIId Iia of aistina aewer lilies 011 or _~88111 tram ... .'1
ta:.J:'vu ~r;:, uL1~ .......er .M!!,,_...... """'fVnaJ ImI.", I.~ tb..n ~ .A 12" DIN"-. (V.A
~ ' .
. f-I&J~ IAJ t::~~ ....-WA.'-/ ,.,. /tC ~IU~ -r"MIrT'; 'Al.'tp"'y,u..""J~L.l- ~~ uh,.I as.
\f!!~~E2~~~~~fW
c1J ,,\-;\ p......' Sv(IJ"r.>IH"r-Jr:>f'f"t_IC. .AAA1bl...u....-. '71> "tJ.E 'P'.I ~;!!1UrPII &.,.,aJ -"'Ill
ty 'PL.'tJ ~ -ntt: ~~t#',e... SE~ ~fJ ~ WT"~ "~fu'''~L~
~-:9r I
CaseNo.~
VD. }lational Pollutant Dischar2e Elimination SVSlem fNPDES) Stormwater Reauirements
Will the applicant be ~uirtd to file a Notice of Intent with the Slate Water Resources Control Board
for coveraae under an NPDES Stonnwater Permit? YE!::..
. .If~. specify which NPDES pennit(s) ~ explain why an NPDES permit is required. AtJ ""'Pr:ES.
.-e;rpoArT" f'n~ ~~u\J.~' 'D(~,,-,,,,~~ J6156r~ATY;:'b &.I/T1oI ti",J&.IrRJ.,....,OIJ,
A~-r1I1"../~~. ~ ~~,.,... Ie P1:="c<('~/~~ .&,.........t,~.e I"tVfI/#eI r::Jt/~ AJ-.4~
WiLl .... ~/Q-u' ,.., Ml't:> ZI==../'.-1k~~ 'Pl1tI!I~ ~lrJ::tiIUE&.""- JtJ:.
p..b- l>~ A. l.a Ll, ~i:I "lJuAAI"JAl e:... JJ b1= DEv~J.lJDua:::=t,.,- .. ~ # e:: .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project'?
~ Yes No
Additional comments 1oJl>~ .
VD.,Remarks
Please identify and discuss lilY remaining potentiaJldverse impacts, mitigation measures, or other
issues. ~ A-PPL.It:..6.../r ~ ~-~Et::> ASS----"!I'i fr' :2)~It:.r 11=" "" .'''....l~
Fa" VUAJ ,e::: IAA~",~~'~
,ill Iqof
.. Y f
~
WI'C~mlllU,ICI.")IU, ~)
..,.,
\
.
Case No. 15.'141<1
FIRE DEPARTMENT
A. What is the distance to the nearest fire ltation? .AD4 what is the Fire Department'. estimated
DACtion lime' ~D sL (" ~ n"\\n. h"'G~i 0,,", +i vv\o
-
:
B. WUl the Fire Dep~ be able to provide 811 ~ left} or &e .. .......~ for the
proposed facility without an incnase ill equipment or peDGIIIId? ~~.$
c. Remarks 0 r,A-' of
~. VO-I)1t\ilJ.,o<u
F' Marshal
o,/tlO/f{'/
Date
.
. .
. .
,-
...-..
.
.
Case No.-'5-~""1'I
'ARKS AA'D RECREATION DEPARTME"'T
:B.
A.
Is projeci subject to Parks and Recreation Threshold requirements7 _'(ji:$'.
If Dot, pJuse aplain.
c.
How many ICres of parkland Ire DeCCS,.~ to ICI'VC the I"~ poject7
~ ~ ~~~ ~J ~~ k~CIC. C,(CoI~\""
Are aistinl nei&hbarhood IIId COIMIUIIity pcb MIl tile pvjecl Dquate III 11M die
population iDcrease resuhina from this project7
Neiahbarhood ~
Community Parks tJ O.
If not, are parkland dedications or other mitilation I" ujAMd as pan of the project adequate
to scrve the population increase?
Neighborhood ,,\~S'
Community Parks ,~ .
To meet City requirements, v.:ill applicant be requirtd to:
Provide land? 'rit-'S
Pay a fee? ,\,,;.t.
Remarks:
D.
E.
F.
. .
. -
t-F: ~~\I~
JIcb and RecnaDon Dimtor... Ljlfllf-'';ve
':2.4If . ~'t-
Date
.'
hit'
.
Case No. 15.q.1-t9
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A. Does the project affect Dative plant communities'? ~
If 10, please identify which c:omrnunitics.
Will the project require Dative plantinl'? (pJc.ase describe).J{\Et ~ ~ '
B. Please identify lilY important Dr biihl)' visibJe JWJsides an Dr IdjaiznllD tile project.
~ .
What 1ll1dscapin, conditions (if lilY) will be required for Ihese JWJsides'?
.
C. Of die total area to be developed, how much. and which areas are ~ to be replanted
and require supplemental waterina'? (please describe).
E.
Are thm any ocher landscape reqWmncnts Dr mitiption for the project' _'(\..,0
.
.- -
've
.
{
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18. 1994
I
,
I
I
!
~,
, .
I ,
I'.l-~'~
~~
StJB3EC'I' :
..
~.n r.ar.on, "ullcUng ~ ,ioudng!
~ohn Lippitt, zngln.ering (EIR only)
Clitt sw.nson, Engin..ring (EIR only)
B.l Ro..nberg, Engin.ering (EIR only)
Roger D.oust, Engin..ring (IS/', EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Ant City Attorn.y (Dratt ..g Dec ~ EIR)
C.rol Gov., Tir. Dep.rtm.nt, "
<<arty Schmidt, P.rks , R.cr.ation
Crime pr.v.ntion, Police Department (M.3. Dio.dado)
CUrr.nt Planning
Duan. Bazzel, Adv.nc. Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leit.r, Planning Dir.ctor
Chula vista El.mentary School District, K.t. Shurson
SW.etwater Union H.S, District, ~om Silva (IS ~ EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Libr.ry (Final EIR) -
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - It annexation is involv.d)
Oth.r
Doug Reid
Environmental Section
Applic.tion tor Initial Study (IS- 94-1~TA-~/DO 060 I
Ch.ckprlnt Dr.tt EIR (20 days) (E1R-_/TB-_/DO I
Revi.w ot a Dr.tt EIR (E1R- ITB- IDP. I
Revi.w of Environment.l R.vi.w R.cord (FC- ERR- I
R.vi.w ot Draft lieg Dec (1S- IFA- IDO- I
I'h. Proj.ct con.i.ts of: An amendment to the EastLake 6reens &eneral
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units ~thin the existing boundaries of East
Lake 6reens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
d to .. any oo...nt. you b.v.
Pl.... r.vl.1t' the docum.nt an
by 02-01-94 .
co_ent.:
.'
;;t c-~~ Ii- <2- -d.~ - ,,;;,. -
-4,4-t~ 'I.~
\
ROUTING FORM
D~E: January 18, 1994
to: Xen Larson, .uilding , Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
clitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Heg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department .
Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, police Department (H,J. Diosdado)
~rnnt Planning' -
'Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chul. Vista Elementary School District, Xate Shurson
~ sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Other:
FROM:
DOUQ Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (IS- 94-1~FA-~/DO 060 )
Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (EIR-_IFB-_/DO )
Review ot . Dratt EIR (EIR- ,FB-_,DP )
Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR-____)
Review ot Draft Heg Dee (IS- IFA- IDQ- )
!'he Project consi.ts ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens Genera'
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1, The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2, The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units,
Ple.se review the document and torward to .. any co...nt. you have
by D2-01-94
co_ent.: ,,'f'fTf ,",,~c. ~ ~ Do....lC.McQ.~.
, ~&~ t ~o.....~ ~ ~~( ~~ ...0 CI2<)~
rf) _ "\1,J...~ ~~_-9 \ ~ 0"",-
.
ROUTING FORM
(
DATE: January 18, 1994
to: ~en Larson, BuIldIng , HousIng
John LIppitt, EngIneering (EIR only)
Clift Swanson, Engineer1ng (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Eng1neering (15/', EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, A$st C1ty Attorney (Draft Heg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, T1re Department .
Harty schmidt, Parks , Reereat10n
Crime Prevent1on, Police Department (H,J. Diosd.do)
CUrrent Plann1ng
Duane Bazzel, Advance Plann1ng
.otI iII.~n.t"t, ~1~Y-oz.a...I___ ""~1..H..~t,
)ob Le1ter, PlannIng 1)ir.ctor--'.---"
Chula vista Element.ry School District, ~ate Shurson
~ Sweetwater Union H,S, D1str1ct, Tom SIlva (IS' EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Dr.ft EIR - It annexation 1s dnvolved)
other
TROM:
Doug Reid
Environment.l section
SUBJECT: Applic:at1on for Init1.l Study (IS- 94-1g,tFA-..6!,a..lDO 060 J
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO )
Review ot a Dratt EIR (EIR-_IFB-_IDP)
R.vi.w ot Env1ronment.1 Rev1ew R.cord (FC- ERR-_)
R.vi.w ot Dratt H.g D.e (IS- IFA- IDO- )
!'h. proj.ct cons1st. ot: An lmendment to the ElStllke Greens General
Development Plan Ind Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
like Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density Ind
2, The Iddition of 22,7 Icres to Elstllke Greens development with
In Idditional 97 dwelling units,
Pl.... r.vI.w the docum.nt and torw.rd to .. any comm.nts you h.v.
by D2-01-94 .
co...nt.:
'~ ;d.y~~
CHULA VISTA POLlCE DEPARTMENT
CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
.. ~
. --'...
........
.. -'.
~ .
DAn:: t-....~ ~ /qq4.
TO; 7\,..,J &A, k.tl. d CW4..to I!,... P..I2.t n n V-....
VIA: ~~,7~'-',:f+.v. ~v,
ROM: 'Y114r ~ I 5Q..t'S
PROJECT: :J.';). q ~ -/ q O'l'Y..u1&. f,o..JL...I..A- eJ~ ~~ ?L~
_ The Crime Prevention lInit does not have any comments rcSardinS this project at this time.
_ Information on the project, or within the plans, does not provide enouih detail to permit
crime prevention analysis.
15L- Please forward the followinS information to the Crime Prevention Unit when available.
~ Elevations
Floor Plans
L Landscape and LiJhtinS Plans
~ Site Development Plans
Comments: !?.J VIt-t_ (/""-'1/-'"* 7r~L \../ );aJ,": /UJ f!n?7d1iM:f.u
ye.i.i:l.J.d ~ YI..l. G~ p(p.~-" t?~ oP~H~I'#W<1: >4)
I/-, ~ 1M 6. l :n....J 'l.. '4--'- ~.J1I4-d Vt(.- d" L
M_
.
cc:: Brookover, SCA
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February I, 1994
Doug Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
Duane E. Bazze~
Principal Planner
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECI':
Initial Study for EastlAke Greens GDP/SPA Amendment (IS-94-19)
The Advance Planning Division appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed
project identified above. From an environmental analysis standpoint it appears that the
EastLalte Greens ElR and Addendum sufficiently addressed the proposed density transfers
within EastLake Greens. The proposed transfer of units are occurring under the umbrella
of the originally-approved EastlAke Greens SPA and Tentative Map (2,774 units). therefore,
unless there are significant shifts in unit locations it would appear that the ongina] ElR
adequately addresses the transfers.
It should not be forgotten, however. that as a condition of approval of a recent GP
amendment to Parcel 26 of the Greens (GPA.93-04). the City CouncD re-enacted the
affordable housing requirement for the Greens (deferred with the Tentative Map approval)
and directed staff to work with a task force to develop recommendations by July of this year
on how to handle the low and moderate income housing within this project. 1bis direction
from Council included the consideration of any density transfen De~faJ)' to achieve the
housing requirement. It does not appear that the proposed density transfen are significant
enough to impact the task force efforts, but nevenheless, these efforts should be considered
prior to approving any SPA amendment.
The 97 units to be annexed and added to the Greens bPe only been analyzed aia General
Plan level (within the Otay Ranch Program EIR) and DOt at the detail DC'~'.J)'with a GDP
and/or SPA. This Deeds to be taken into consideration when aiWyzIng potential
eDViroDmentaJ impacts. Additionally. project.level anaJysis Deeds to be COOJdiilated with the
Community plannil'lg Divis.ion of the planning Depanment (Otay Ranch SPA Team) on the
ilsue of land use and design interface with East Oranae AYCDue and efforts on the adjacent
Otay Ranch.
cc: Ken Lee
Steve Griffin
Amy Wolfe
.tJ.r.~}
MEMORANDUM
Pebruary 1, 1994
Pile I YS-S9l
SUBJECT :
Doug Reid, Bnvironmental Coordinator
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy PUblic Works Director~~
City Engineer ~
Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Bnginee~
Eastlake Greens General Development and Sectional Area
Plans Amendment
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
In response to your concern regarding our transportation comment in
the subject initial study application, the following paragraph
should be added to Section VII of the application.
Previous traffic studies have shown that the circulation
system plan prior to the construction of SR12S does not
have sufficient capacity to absorb additional trips
beyond those trips accounted for in the approved maps
including the approved Bastlake Greens. Thus the
Bastlake Greens proposed expanded development project
will have to be limited to the number of trips identified
in the approved project EIR traffic study. Bowever, the
applicant may wish to perfo:nn a supplemental traffic
study to examine possibilities of expanding the City's
circulation system (e.i. extension of B. Orange Avenue
between 1-805 and Eastlake Greens) to provide the needed
capacity. A reference to the City' II interim SR-12S
financial study (HNTB study) and improvement scheduling
are a critical element of the study.
ZAO:rb
cc: ,Roger Daoust, Senior Civil angineer
Cl'1 ~\-:-..-.- \ft.APPJe\"~.DD)
,.
MEMORANDUM
February 21, 1994,
File II YS-55 1
TO:
Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Directorl. Y
City Engineer r
Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engin-Q ./
,'-"<, '~..J1.:J.
Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment Traffic Study (IS-93~ ~
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
I have reviewed the attached traffic impact report by Urban Systems elated February 18, 1994
and fmd it to be acceptable, The new trips from the added 97 units to the Eastlake Greens
approved units of 2774 have no significant impact on the City's circulation system,
ZAO:dv
Attachment
._\~.ZAO
.'
"
URBAN SYSTEMS .lWSOCIATES, INC.
fit J.1J.~6G....~,,,, .J..!'..G'~~ ~:~.....~./E:~
Q::>>.51.t TNITI TO lNDlJnJty AND ~NT . . ': '( :::,- t.; ~ '..: L ~ .~. ~;; ; :..
:-~~ ;".-:==:~..':-: :.f~i
1SS4 Frs 22 AM 9-..5
February 18, 1994
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
City Traffic Engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Hal:
Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Eastlake Development to
evaluate possible Impacts from the development of additional dwelling units In the Eastlake
Greens GDP/SPA Amendment. The Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment proposes an
Increase of 97 dwelling units from 2,714 DU to 2,871 DU.
'proiect.Id1;! Generation
."
The development of 97 additional dwelling units will result In the following peak hour and dally
trip generation.
1M PEN< Plot PEN<
USE INT!NSITY CIENERo'TlON N1f
MTE Nft 1M litOVI' IN:OUI' "'"" Plot IN:OUI' IN.-out'
IPUT IPUT
SFDU I7DU 11)'00 170 ~ 71 &1 11:12 1~ 17 7:3 11:28
As can be observed, the 97 additional units will result In 97 PM peak hour 1rIps. Of the 97 PM
peak hour trips, 68 are Inbound and 29 outbound to the project, The NIl peak would have 78
additional peak hour trips with 16 k1bound and 62 outbound dumg 1111 peak, .
" .
A trIftic 8IUdy for Kalser HospItal (Eutlake I SPA Amendment by JHK ~) rill
, The KaIser HoapIIaI tratIIc 8Iudy repr..enta the moat recent
analysis of interim conditions for eastern Chula VIsta (east of I 805), The anaIyIII for Interim
conditions assumed the -approved projects- level of development for". interim analysis. The
-approved project" level of development was bP-ed on the Final Eastern Chuta VIsta "
Transportation Phasing Plan Update prepared by WUdan AllOCIates (1191),
..
.~7
1D1_
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
February 18, 1994
IJtban &y.tems Associates, Inc.
l
In the final report for KaIser Hospital dated AprD 20, 1992, (page 41), the approved project
development scenario will result In approximately 193.230 additional dally trips In Eastem Chula
Vista. 'The analysis Included trips generated by 2,774 units In the Eastlake Greens project,
Using the -approved projects" condition as the bpe, Impacts from the KaIser Hospital were
evaluated. Attachment 1 ahows the NlJPM peak hour Intersection level of MrvIce from the
KaIser HospItal traffic analysis. .
As shown In Attachment 1. aJllntersections are forecasted to operate at . level of MrvIce -D"
or better. KaIser Hospital Impacts to the Intersection of Otay Lakes at Eastlake Parkway (the
crIticaIlnteraectlon for the KaIser Project) for the NlJPM peak results In a level of Mrv\ce -C"
10 -D", Intersection delay was 5.2 aeconds for the Nt. peak ancI5.4 aeconds In the PM peak
at this location. The Increased delay at this location was due to more than 14,000 dally trips
from the KaIser project being added to the base conditions.
The KaIser analysis concludes that the intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway Is 25,8 seconds In the Nt. peak and 29.8 In the PM peak which translates to a level
of service D. It should be noted that the Intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway could be Increased as much as 10 aeconcls and stili remain at a level of service -D",
SPA Amendment ImDacts
In order to determine possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment, project traffic was
added to the Intersection analysis discussed above, All other ncumDUQrJI for the computer
Intersection analysis remained the aame, As ahown on Attachment 2, the resulting level of
service Including project traffic remained -D" for both the Nt. and PM peak, A comparison of
Attachment 1 and 2 ahows that with project traffic the intersection delay Increased only 1.5
aeconcls In the NIl peak and 2,1 aeconds In the PM peak. this cIearty indicates that the Spa
Amendment for Interim (worst case) conditions Is not Ukely to create mpacta which would require
mitigation or change the level of service at Eastlake Parkway and Otay Lakes Road.
In addition, possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment ... Ma\yzed tor the
Int....ectIon of Eastlake Parkway and Fenton Sbeet. .Base conditions tor 1M Intersection
anaIysIa were obtained from the ScrIpps Clinic TraffIC anaIysIa dated March 30,1893, For the
base conditions, ligna! timing was optimized which resulting In a level of ....101 eo" tor the P ,M,
peak or an intersectiOn delay of 36.7 MCOnds (Me Attachment 3),
Project IraftIc was then added to the bue conditionS, All other auumptionI for the computer
Interaectlon analysis remained the aame, As ahown on Attachment a. the .-u\tIng level of
. service including project traffic remained "D". Interaec:tlon delay changed only 0.4 IICOnda to
37,1. this cIearty ahows that the SPA amendment for Interim conditions Is not Ikely to create
Impacts which would require mitigation, N. buDd out or with an Interim 125 or with an Orange
Avenue connection, Spa Amendment mpacta would be wen ImaIler beca'''' there would be
multiple .~ss routes. .
.,-
wacNn117
Mr, ~ Rosenberg
February 18, 1994
Urban Systems Associates, Inc,
~
BaSed on the Information discussed above, Impacts from the development of 97 additional units
appear to have minima/impacts on the circulation system, We therefor auggest that no further
traffic analysis Is nec8nary,
Please can us If you have any questions regarding the analysis dlscurtecl above.
,
APSfTRS:vks
Attachments
c:c: Bruce Sloan
Cliff Swanson
Doug Reid
,.
101_
~1
r
(
C/)
Ci5
>-
-l
<
Z
<
a:
=>
o
:I:
~..J
<<
w~
c.._
zfu
-Qo
~~:I:
~()c:
~UJw
~Cf.)Cf.)
<c:_
~UJ<
~~~
<z~
-a:
-0
~u.
..-
I
a:
C/)
w
tt
Q.
-
~
-
tt
W
....
Z
-
.~;
I~I .
J I~ AAUAUUAAAUU UuUA.AAU.. _A A AC.AAA
,: I !i1 m.mma .mmm [i].I',m
;( l!j.'...A......AAAUU ......U..AU..... _... - . C..A...
i!=<c
! il ~II1 il..a;a;;;.; .ta~a.E~:Ja -. - .:I;;;a
. ct:!
~ f~
!~
d
(z
!E
U
~
~
~
'"
%
1'1 tn
~J -1-;;
it Iii
J! .. J
Ii li~~
I nJsU
.. It dU
II~ Iftl
f I nil :
i If Jill
1 UJ .Ii
i _I~~ ~llct.'1 J
J Innn 1 t o~ i !
t ]1111 l!!!!!!11 II I II}II ; I!] .i.I! i ~
Jjjii!!!!!!! IJJJIIIIII II j Ilfii ~": ~
___.____._== =:=~=.~~== :: ~ a:a.. I J ~
II .000....... .......... .. · "'0.. n ili ~
II
~! III........... .......... .. · ..... I ff JwU
!= - · II ,JJI ~
IE 1 III IUI, I III ,i) III III i II j~ I Ct)
Ii
I~ I
11,1 J)])])] ! {d Ir :
. tun)!!!!!!! IJIJIJIJIJIJIJlIJ II' j'IIU! , i6] ..II i ~ Ii
~~!~~~~~~~~~ ~a~.=.c.~~ ~. ~ ~~!!! j". J I! I
. i !
I . J '11111 I
I !!II!!!)'j!!'l!! ,~III 'JIIllf!!!
!~lil!ijjJI!lj!;J!JIIIIIIJJjJ!J!;1
II:
o
~
en
Ci5
>-
-!
<
zt-
<0
zw
0"")
-0
1-0:
N~a..
~eno
WII:W
~WCI)
:I:t-O
(.)Za..
<-
~_O
<"'II:
C\la..
.-
'w
II:::I:
ent-
W
D:
a..
-
~
-
II:
W
~
-
10..
..
.~E
........
....
DO'
0';1
DO'
....
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. .
II !
:. .;
:! ..
til a .
:;:\ II
., ..
; :~ I S
~ ::! t .
- . 3 .... ..
. ..~rJ
I. I ~c
.. :~!!J=~&
... . lit E ~ I .
~ : t5~~U:
lit. . . . . . .
..~: .; : : : : :
. .0.....
....... .
F.&: t ~ : : : :
I~. ~..t; . oS
W\;:e:~~~
.!.~&o;c"'EI
:M:...~~a;:e
~
i j'';' ....
."":":":": ,II:
li==~~lgi""" ~~ i~ : ~ ~
I i ~~..~ !~~~""I 1" .. ~~ 5= .. .... ~
o ~~~~~~I It ...011 =. ·
1""""""1 ~ _~~W\ . t
............ i. ~~~2~~~2 ~!e!ou...u..ou. ..
~....... fi ~~;; 1;1 I Ie Ii t i
I .... 1..............~.fIt. J
0..... 2.. . ..... ... .....
. . . . . . I t .................. t I
INNNNNN' N......N......NNN'
_____001 I 1'1 .. .. D I
t ~C.... t e. I ~ ;
~~~~..Ici I~ ~ -
_____~__I B.o...I;~ .. ~1:~~=:=C:==lfIt
I Ea I I...... IeM ....."'............."".....11"1 I
IE~~. 2& i E =- ..........001.
... :r;:-.... I=-
ft ..1 ...................... i:
.....111 ... "."'..................fltlo
E =-, ~~~~~~~~~~~~
i- till ~~II i..~..o..oo..li
, l.a.....a....al!..u.... ti
~~~f~~~2p.~i I;
II I iE: II I I I ~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
i i ~~..~
: II~~~~~~
. ~.~...
.
.
.
. .
n I
:. - ~~~~~~
I II i I::::::
I: I ! -i!!$:--
,. is i-II I:::~.
;; ...II;..f 'I......
;li~~~.~~~I! I..Nft.
. . . . . . . .. filii_in
I: : B : : : : : ....~
.. . .. . .. .1
.-: ~f--::::
II": 1~5 = =1 i
i : ~uu '
.. :..1111;: I
OOODOO'
..... .1
.............1
................1
,
I
.a...... i
~~~~~C!I
1.............,.1
........
;1:::=:-
! ........
er:;:::D
....N
.",..0
~..o..
"N"
~~u
0000001
..... .1
.......N..NI
...................1
.a......
~~C!~~c:
.NNN......
.............
.........
.........
....
..N.
..
un
~-~~~~
_,....N"
I_IZZ:
is..... .
;-0000
I.....
.....
~
!
....
......
E'c~~oo
_~f'I..
..
i~........
..
! uu
I; ~~~~
I ....
i.....
II....
IS-....
I-~~~~
-........
I-~~~~
-....
Inl,
0..
. ,
:1:
..
,
I~ ....
N
2*.......
t
....
i"
..
~I!UUUI!
I: · .:
IE eo
=... ..
*.. .....
..
i....
..
t"
..
sunu211
. I ..
!o
S
co
co 0
o
,
!
.0'
. .,
..,
,
!u
5
.
. u
o
,
~c:
...
!
..,
...
~~I
....
..
i~
.
f
.
..
..
. ..
.. ,,:.
N ..
.
..
.
.:
.
u
"Iauuu.u..... ..
I......"..........~ 1...-
5.......... .
.I=:~:=:==.=. I
I .:
&l1..~."...."...... =
,.=;.;=I==:=I~
............ .
I
..
..
..
..J.:....f'....f'
~ :;.=:;=:;=~=
............ .
...........
..
i.
:........... I
. I I I C
~
~
~
~
I
~
~
I{j
I
~
~
~
~
I
r
(
t-
o
W
"")
o
a:
~
c
w
U)
o
D.t-
Ow
a:w
D.a:
wt-
~U)
t-z
a:0
ot-
u-Z
w
mU-
M Ci5 t-
...><
Z-J
!M< >
:tz <
~<~
"'z~
<0 a:
-<
t-Q.
o
ww
U)~
a:<
W-l
t-t-
zU)
-<
iC)W
N
--
I
W
a:
Q.
-
(
\
~
a:
w
~
.'....:.
..
-:-:-:-:~~I : 1-:1 ~~I
I""""""' ~ iOE .. I.
::::;-,' i ""..I;~.. .. ~~ S . .. ~
...... ...~~~~ i IE - !
lil_I~~~~::,! :~::::jl:ii~. :.. ~~ :~ ~ ~ ~ 5
i...... :-1 .
: 1::::::1,' ::::\1 s~=t~~~tl~I~!uu._u...u. ~
....... ~.. :... i a'l -
. E .':':':1 1 I -\ !
i. , ......11 ....,. ~~~~~-:-:~-:-:~ !
E ......, Ii -i......."'.......
. IN........... 0 ..""'............
I ~ ------! 1=....1 ~i .. ; -
I ~ ! 1 ....... i c ! .., ..-.......... ~
_~ I a,I-.-_.-..-..-:--I' II.... -i MM" ~~i ;~~~~~~~~~~I.
. . _I" 2& . .. .......... I
t ~:. .., a;-.... I!
O-!!j'" I , .. -:~ ,...........-....... &
I .1..~D~lir:::. I, ~ _Ie .... (=::::::::1
; i !ii~;E i ..~- I c~~~:~ ~ ~..........I'
I;: : : : : : : I 1::::- i'M." ~~ I . - a
=E:I:::::I ... l:g I" D
~.:~~::::! I:::. I;;~~'~ 1.............I!..l!lli
11-: .~~ : :51 -. , -...., s"=nI!l:21~ 'I' 5
.. :E<<~~~~I I ~
. .. IoICI-Z , I
: : ..21a;:: 1 !i~=1 I III: I I I ...1 I I .. ..
.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
.
.
-
.
-
.
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
:
.
.
-
-
.
-
.
-
.
-
-
-
.
.
-
.
-
.
-
.
.
.
.
-
.
.
:
h Ii _II I:i:.
I IIII~!~!II!=:.
r ::::: :\ u::.
i1i I! ~J'HI1 I;::.
I i ""~I! ..
.. . .i... I .J~I
~~I .
.. :I.
S
.
.
......, : 1..
I~~~~~~: ~ ef
::::;-1 i ~"..il;i.. .. ~~
I .......
II~~~~~~! ~~~~==!ii ... ~~
..~~e I~~~~~ _ ..
.. i.. If ..;
~~~~~~ ... ..
I:::::: I I...
::;;" I, ---- I :"':"'11
1====== I;t:::: 1* ~~
II.... .i~ ... ..
:i~
IS-....
I.. .. Qt
I.~~~~
-...... ..r.
i...
I.~~~~
-....
.
. .
!
I~
~
r
.
.;
.
.. ~
i ::
!
.;
.
"Iu.......u. ;.
i............... I
il==i:=ii:::: !
tl=:::::III= i
.............
.......... .
t
-
I
.1.."::=I.~!
... .:1.- II
.......... .
..........
..
i~
i
':..:...... I
UUUUII,
. I ..I
I I
lUll
~
~
~
I
~
~
~
~
Ct)
~
~
!
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1994
File Number YS 591
SUBJECT :
Doug Reid, Bnvironmental Review Coor~i~f.tor
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Bngineer ~J
Initial Study 94-019, BastLake Greens GDP " SPA Amendment
TO:
FROM:
This is to clarify our comments (on sewers and drainage) dated
February 1, 1994 concerning the information provided in the
application for the subject Initial Study.
Our comments on drainage (Section I, A through E) noted that
project specific improvements would be required as development
occurs and further, that regional improvements in Salt Creek and
Poggi Canyon may be required as development occurs. This comment
was meant to convey that development of the overall General
Development Plan area would probably require construction of
regional level drainage improvements. Any additional development
which may occur as a result of this amendment may require greater
capacity in those facilities, but we believe that the added
capacity would be insignificant.
Our comments on Section VI, Waste Generation, noted that some
segments of the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer will be over capacity
at, or prior to, General Plan buildout conditions.
This comment addressed the fact that the EXISTING Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer lacks capacity to serve the buildout development. A
Development Impact Fee (DIF) is presently in place for gravity
basin development, and a Telegraph Canyon Pumped Basin DIF will be
in place very shortly, as will a Salt Creek Basin DIF.
The parallel and upgraded facilities provided for through the
collection of these fees will be adequate for the provision of
sewer service to all of the affected development areas for 'as long
as necessary.
The additional development which may result from th,e proposed
amendment may have a non-significant impact on one .egment of the
sewer line. That impact would be that an upgrade required by tbe
overall development would increase by a minor degree with the added
development. No increase in the DIF would occur.
"
aID: 1'....111
'1\JOKI\IMG~\Z".-01'
EXHIBIT A
l
pescriPtion of Work
Assessment District 94-1
The general clesaiption of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following:
1. Street improvements consisting of JrIding, base, pavin&, pttu, aidewa1k, street 1i&hting and
1a"AY"ping within the following ri&Jlts-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubbouse Drive to Unit 6 emrance (2,400 L.F., Phase I).
b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3).
2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facUities, storm drain facilities,
aewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facUities, telepbo~ facUities, lIS facilities,
television facilities IS appropriate by applicable state and federa1ltatutes within the following rights-
of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubbouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.F., Phase I).
b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6.entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3).
3. DIF fuDded street improvements consisting of JrIding, storm drain, base, paving, curb, JUtter,
sidewalk, medians, streetligbting, J,ntluo.aping and Itreet monll",pl'f'ltion witbiD the following ri&Jlts-
of-way:
.. Hunte Parkway _ from Clubhouse Drive to South GreeDIView Drive (2,300 L.F., Phase 2).
4. DIF funded street and WldergrOUDd improvt~ CODSistiD& or 1J'I4iDi. aDd ItDI1I1 drain
iu.1proveJDents witbiD the followiJl& ri&hll~-way: '
L Hunte Parkway. from South QreeDIview to Oranae A\'CDUC (1,270 LF., Phaae 2).
b. Oruae Avenue. from Hunte Parkway II) the SDa&! cuezDeIII (3,500 LF., PbUe 2).
~
W7C .;. \IllS.'"
V!A'J.'"
'&2]
~t".:'O FJ 1;11",. Ru;"J
RJCK ENGlj\'EERlNG COMPANY
S.,,, Dit'~o
Cdlrvmi:l. 9~II0.~~9t-
\I'hl&" I?I "1:'/1\' /);', ....''1
,t-I~J .NI.('IiOi
F,4" 1t-191~91"'lfI~
,....;
r;.-;." ..
. -- - -.
19~"
. wI~:
February 7, 1994
Mr. Clifford Swanson
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. California 9J 912
RE: EASTLAKE GREENS. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND
SPA AMENDMENT (J-12347)
Dear Mr. Swanson:
This is to confirm thaI the StOnTI drainage s):stem designed for EastLake Greens has adequate
capacity to accommodate the run-off Benerated by additional areas beinl! incorporated into
EastLake Greens SPA boundary, as shown on the altached exhibit. In addition. areas being
added do not adversel)' impact the drainage s)'slem previously planned and approved as pan of
Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 88-03,
Should you have any questions, please call me,
Sincerely,
_ RICK ENGIN~~..c~MPANY
Dc...~
Dennis C. Bowlin~.?, R.C.E.
Director. Water Resources Division
OCB:kt.OOl
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Reed, City of Chula Vista .
Mr. Bruce Sloan, Eastl.ake Development Company
Mr. Houshmllnd Aftahi, Rick EnBineerin, Company
,
.
F,-.
. ,
...::. .
February 9,1994
Mr, Cliff Swanson
City Engineer
CITi OF CHUl.A VlST ^
276 Fourth Avenue
ChuJa Vista. CA 91910
Re: EastLake Greens Development Plan and
Spa Amendment 15.94.19
[)ear Cliff:
As a part of the review of the referenced initial study the engineering
department noted possible adverse impacts to the sewer system serving the
EastLake Greens Project. As a response to this concern, 1 have quantified
the impact of the Plan Amendment in each of the sewer basins within the
EastLake Greens Project. This review (anached) has concluded that the
impacts of the additional development within each of the basins is minimal
when compared to previous land use and system analysis perfonned by the
city.
If you have any questions regarding this infonnation, please do not
hesitate to call me.
,
Sincerely,
fASTl,.AKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Bruce Sloan
Senior Project Manager
cc: Doug Reid . Environmental Review Coordinator
"
4&
..
.
EASTlAKE
orvtLOI'MENT
COMPANY
toO ~---
Sulle 100
CtUO \1110, CA 91914
(019) .21.0127
FAx (019) ..,1.1130
,
~
-....
SALT CREEK BASIN GRAVTIY SEWER ANALYSIS
Sewer service to the Salt Creek Basin within the EastLake Greens
Project in cWTently provided by the Otay Lakes Road Lift Station
Oocated at Otay Lakes Road and Salt Creek) and the Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development
Plan and Spa Amendment affects the following parcels within the Salt
Creek Basin:
Parcel Existing Uni ts Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(south) 42 51 9
R-I0 167 246 79
R-ll 92 87 <5>
R-22 146 141 <5>
R-23 205 214 9
R-27 40 44 ..
Net Change [n Units 91
The flow generated by the additional 91 dwelling units (based on 250
GPD per DU) is 15.8 GPM. This amount represents an increase of
1.4% over the 1100 GPM flow rate assumed to be generated by the
EastLake Project within the Salt Creek Basin (see Telegraph Canyon
Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment
Incorporating Pumped Flows, Figure 8, Page 11). The operation or the
Dtay Lakes Road Lift Station and Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer
should not be significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in
the flow rate.
.-
r .
.
.(.
TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN IMPROVEMENT AND FINACIAL PLAN
The proposed General Development Plan and Spa Plan Amendment
will affect 4 paTl.:els CR-', R-ll, R-14. and R-24) that are located
within the boundary of the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer Basin. At
the time the Basin Improvement and Financing Plan was developed
EastLake Development Company and the City assumed the unit counts
proposed in the Amendment. Therefore, no modification to the
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan is
required.
POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN
Sewer service to the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin within the EastLake
Greens Project is currently provided by the EastLake Parkway Pump
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. The proposed
EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment
affects the following parcels within the Poggi Canyon Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(north) 42 51 9
R.14 84 86 2
R-15 88 65 <13>
R.20 164 143 <21>
R.25 74 78 4
R-28 27 60 33
Net Change In Units 14
The Average flow to the EastLake Parkway Pump Station (as outlined
in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan
Amendment Incorporating Pumped Flows) is 254 GPM. At a rate of
250 gallons per day per unit the net increase in. units lenerates an
additional 2.4 GPM. The operation of the EastLake Parkway Lift
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should not be
significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in flow rate.
....
MAR- ~-~4 WED 1~:1. CHL'L
' A'.... t S';TA S.:.HOCIL -. I ~..r..
IOARD Of EDUCATIOW
05E~ D.~IHGS Ph.D.
LARRY CUNNINQ!W.A
lHAIION GUS
'ATRCU .AJDO
GIlfG R. SANDOVAl
IU'EIIINTEHDENT
L"lAs~Ph.D
1='.04:
CHULA VISTA ELEME'NTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET. CHt:LI\ \"lSTA. CA1JFOR."\IA !11910 . 6194Z:i,9(i()0
EACH Cmi,D IS AJ~l'SD1\'IUt:A.I- OF GREArWt:>HTii-'-'.--'--
March 9,1994
Mr, Doug Reid
Environmental Review Dept.
City of Chula Visla
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
Dear Mr Reid
The proposed GDP/SPA Ame~dr.lent will Increase the lolal dwelling unit count
within EastLake Greens by 9- ~Ini!s from ~774 10 2871 AI the District-wide
average student generatIon ra:e 01 0.3 students/unit, t"llS equates to 861 Sludents,
It is an\!cipated that all ctllldrer-, from EastLaLe Greens. including those from the
additional 97 un lIs will alte,,! SChc,,; No S5 which will bp. constructed In the
EastLake Greens Community and has a pwposed opening date of July, 1995
This school is planned to cpen on a slngle-Irack year-round schedule and
eventually convert to a multi-track year.round schedule when required to
accommodate enrollment.
All elemenlary school facilities within the EastLake Community will be financed by
participation in Community Fa:,hties Dlslncl No 1, which fully miligates all project
impacts on schools,
If you have any queslions. pleEose contact me.
Sincerely,
~\ct.. S\.~.~",.'-
Kate Shurson
Director, Planning & Facilities
..
KS:dp
cc' Kety Wright
I~'"
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
APPENDIX B
11m CITY OF CH\JU, VISTA DISa.OSURE STATEMENT
You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of cenain ownership or financial intereslS, paymenlS, or campaign
contributions, on aU mailers which wiU require discretionary action on tbe pan of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
aU other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. Ust the names of aU persons having a financial inlerest in the property which is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.s., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontraclor, material supplier.
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (EDC)
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES (CPH)
I
"
2, If any person' idenlified pursuant to (t) above is a corporation or pannership, list the names of aU individuals owning
more Ihan 10% of the shares in Ihe corporation or owning any pannership inlerest in the pannership,
CPH - DONALD L. BREN TRUST
EDC - BOSWELL PROPERTIES, INC.
3. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit orpnization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as dir~tor of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or tr:ustor of the trust.
DONALD L. BREN - TRUSTEE
4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No...!.. If yes, please Indicate person(s): _
5. Please identify each and every person, Including any agenlS, employees, consultants, or Independent contractors who
you have assigned 10 represent you before the City in Ihis matter.
EDC - BOB SNYDER, BILL OSTREM, CURT
CPH - SHERM HARMER, MICHAEL DUNHAM,
STEPHENSON, PAUL NIETO
JEFF FOSBURG
6. Have you and/Or your officers or agenlS, In the aggregale, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councllmember In the
current or preceding election period? Ycs_ No.lL If yes, state which Councilmember(s):
· · · (NO'IE:
AUaQ addllioaal pa~. ~'Y) · · ·
~2~O
Signalure of contractorlapplicanl
MICHAEL DUNHAM, VICE PRESIDENT - CPH
Print or type name of contractor/applicanl
Date:
2/8/95
, fu:!!!!! is d<fiIlWIIS.' "AIry iNII....at, fin... c".~, joiN......"" lWOCi/Ui",. _ill! ,1Mb. Jr-niI/ .".,.wu;",. c<XpOftIIiotI. ............. r<cti"", "..t;c0l<,
rhiJ and mty 0IMr cowII)'. city tlIId t'0IUID)'. cily mun;eiptJlity, dunel, 01 odtet poliu.ct:ll adNIi..uiot~ CKIIIfy 0Ihtr 6DUP Of' combUvlliOft <<ling as " ww."