The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPlanning Comm Reports/1994/12/21 (3) City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of December 21, 1994 Page 1 2. Public Hearing: PCS-95-02: Tentative Subdivision MaD for Parcel R-15, Chula Vista Tract 95-02. within the EastLake Greens Planned Communitv - Western Salt Companv A. BACKGROUND 1. Western Salt Company has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Unit 15 at EastLake South Greens, Chula Vista Tract 95-02, in order to subdivide 11.9 acres of land into sixty eight (68) lots; sixty four (64) single-family residential lots, three (3) open space lots (Lot A, B and C) and one (1) golf course view corridor lot (Lot D). The property is designated as Parcel R-15 within the EastLake Greens Planned Community. (see locator/Attachment #1). 2. An Initial Study, IS-94-19, was previously prepared in conjunction with the recent amendment to the EastLake II General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan, EastLake II Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastLake Greens Master Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3). The Enviromnental Review Coordinator has determined that the project implements and falls under the purview of Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and that no further enviromnental review is necessary. B. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution PCS-95-02 recommending that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached draft City Council Resolution. C. DISCUSSION 1. Existing Site Characteristics The project site is located on the east side of South Greensview Drive approximately 300 ft. south of Clubhouse Drive, within the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community. The 11. 9 acre parcel has been graded and is elevated on average approximately 10-12 ft. above South Greensview Drive. The property slopes downward from a southerly to northerly direction and is surrounded by variable slopes to the east and north and a City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of December 21, 1994 Page 2 combination of 2: 1 and 5: 1 open space slopes along the western property line. 2. Zoning and Land Use Site PC (Planned Community) - Residential Vacant (target density - 65 du) North South East West PC (Planned Community) - PC (Planned Community) - PC (Planned Community) - PC (Planned Community) - Open Space Residential Open Space Residential! Elementary School EastLake Golf Course Vacant EastLake Golf Course Vacant 3. Proposed Development The proposed development involves minor regrading of the site, construction of 64 single-family detached homes on lots averaging approximately 5,600 sq. ft. construction of on-site and off-site improvements necessary to serve the subject subdivision and improvement of an open space landscape buffer along the west side of the property (Lot A, B and C). The proposal also includes development of a golf course trail/view corridor parcel (Lot D) as required by the EastLake Greens SPA Trails Plan (Attachment #2). Said golf course view corridor parcel is required to be improved prior to or concurrently with the development of the subject site (Resolution 17618, special condition of approval #2). Staff recommends that the golf course trail improvements associated with the subject development be constructed in accordance with the submitted plans (Attachment #7) and concurrently with the improvement of Street "A" and "B". 4. Tentative Subdivision Map. The Tentative Subdivision Map will create 68 lots. The lots are proposed to be arranged in a linear fashion along the central "spine" road (Street "A" and "B"). Access to the project will be provided at two points via South Greensview Drive. a. Compliance with EastLake Greens SPA Plan. Residential units will be constructed on Lots 1 to 64. The project at buildout will have a density of 5.4 du/ac and will be in compliance with the recently approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan density range (5-15 du/ac), the target density (5.6 du/ac) and target dwelling unit number (65 du) for the project site. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of December 21, 1994 Page 3 b. Compliance with Planned Community Regulations and Residential Design Guidelines. Development of the site is subject to compliance with the RP-8 residential district property development standards. The majority of those standards are established by approval of individual site plans in order to ensure proper site plan and architectural design relationship and provide adequate flexibility for the development of various product types. Compliance with the applicable property development standards and residential design guidelines will be ensured via the design review process. Attachments 1. Locator 2. EastLake Greens SPA Trails Plan 3. Planning Commission Resolution 4. Draft City Council Resolution 5. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program for 15-94-19 6. Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-95-02) 7. Golf Course Trail Conceptual development plan 8. Disclosure Statement (m:\home\planning\amyw\pcs95-02. rpt) LOCATOR ATTACHMENT #1 ~~j1~ '\U.Y I SONNE"Hlll .,[ ~ I. COIl "ADOW ..... Z .. .ILAND 'L. EASTLAKE ( RESIDENTIAL 10.5 DU lAC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ~ PRO.JECT LOCATION --./ ~ CITY COUNTY CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPLICANT: WESTERN SALT CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SUBDIVISION e) ADDRESS: South of Cluhhouse Dr. and Request: 68 lot subdivision. So. Greensview Dr. intenection SCALE: FilE NUMBER: NORTH NONE PCS - 95 - 02 EASTLAKE GREENS SPA TRAILS PLAN ATTACHMENT 11'2 -- ----. ~ t -;..-~_ ~ '-~. - 'j'-- ------ - "-;;-'-'-' - - -"='~1 ( ---;:::. 'I' /",' -i<~:--'~~~~",,,,,i,"\ !)} - - , . .""'",- , , I!ba' - J\ -r.:-~ - : it' ;.""-- \~ "" ''-' ~I f f '\ II'I_~ r. '-'t1t:1 ' , I , Ij"1 ~c n c i............~O'.()d ,..~~~Q.(1 "'~O!r. If ~.:::.;:~f!!!9JjOO_~....--...................~~, '1 ____ \~ ... -..... .".". ... ~ .r r(~..'..., ,01:1' /~k ~~_.~. \' [-~' / C:J ~iI:IM/ "~~~,"",,",~_\ ~ -1' / O:(!J~~!.......!....!~~ ,I "6.M .dI~"" ~~...::, \-()' .:.~~<_ '-/~ '\ " ~~:;,.. ~'-'~-v., ..,'j<""~~~ _ _ \ / .:" , -,:.~!,- 2'.. /. .;-j';' "')" .\\~-.:-"""... ( . ' '.A " ..A 'h! ~'(. A <', '~v \ 0\ " ~;.-"'...y-'. /Cr-!.. '........ ~~ -I)} ~'-"',,'Cf\ -'~,"~'\..S. t~-::.. ' A> ..- ':5\fo, ~?-O"'_- ;~ -"":J."V; 'III~ ~ (~\, II _ ,,"V, _ '-~ ~""_ ~. , '. L' I Ill' :/,f <- (,) \\ 1,- V'-' '\''''--:'. --- >, r,.~'-; -'~: \'J\ ,iJ'- ~~ile-1_ r L--',.f\ ~\.'~..i)(::.,~~~\\ r' \~ "#',, \, ~I CI.- ~ r \ ;\~ ~ I~ ( ~l~~___ ,'__~ ~\ \ (.5 i"<<! r'\\' ~\\ \ ,f . \~_07q.._ ;,- '.:, \\J I, :n:::; .E- _.0_ i ~ Qir...r',/~-"~_ . ~I\ I Q~ ' ,. ~.' J\ L- I ~ \ . ", ' ~ r--', ( " '" ~ ~ \ ~ ~- ""- -~: ',--) :,'~ i \ '~, . M:, 7:-? ,':J ~'--- ___., -u 1,"1 ~ ) ). II'iIl~r 't1 :';_~_J./ .,/ , "' /2)( ~:\ i ~ )\"'''::2-''~:::: ~~-~:::~-r;::.? ,.. l L r-~\\\ '_ ~ 'HI ~., 't( '--/ "=J y- (./ ~'71-' \~\ I /'\v~--" '~ "'-", 1, 11'" Ui \ ~.f'<? _.l~",,;;c- ,-- ~, ~"".~ ~ / ;' \~- ---..." _..:- ~ -.. o~ ~: I r--ij/t:J/1 ' i; ---. )-.;r<==-- ~ ''''\) ~: .~/ II. ... \ ~'~~ ),1\ b...S' .;".f\~ .- '~'~~~r'!J-' L : / . I \ Y-". ~' ~ '/(, ,,' t::1! / ' ~"'.' "~ ~ ''-''.., /~, - '.N " . , I ~-_. r-~ "v- ~c:-/ \",...~ '~~ \~, /I' V \ \~: _,J-~'--.r-7==__-r -/// <,f~....'~"", . =""""'-~"""-C~~A.'~ ,.I". ~~. _' "'---Pj' 'j &"",~- _r-\ , \ 1\ .<', ..:,\i!1'~ ......-~......~=" --'-":~."V.~/. ,~~~ -?fj'/ I I"'" - , -- / ./ "" P':;-:;..~"'-. _ ..",.......^. ,_ ' - QV!"~\'f. '-'-)" )C~--v') 1"; _" . ?;., _ ~"'" _ ____ '/ " .. ~~ ,);, '-.." ',I ,~" _, .,' '0 'I , \\ .- ~~../ ,-,~- <::>. " -~~p . .~.~, '// '. "~''o;, ''cii-).~ ,,~ A~:~'?" _~~ ,,// \'\. .~~~-... \')---",' ~/;;< .' "'->:: :/ \.'\ ' ,~~.. '''-t', '~~//-:, . , ~'~"rv~ ":-'''C ' '..~..;........;J'A~/:? , :'>"/ '\ '\ ,''''.,.~~l.i~...~'''/;/'; .'- , ~- ..... ~ ,'r , . '~ - A.'OQ,;:/,/ " , _ \~y~":~ ',. , \ ,..., Ia.~ .(i)~ > A:J!!1 ums;; ~fz^ i:r Vim l CA CAC -CD -f'" rnrn n .,., [3 IT] i ( '( tt ., g ! s. T T I J I[ if I r I I'q, I I r . J ( . I ! I = I I If - i f '---- --.-- -, ~ --- ... ~ m= ~ ~.. . . Golf ( urse Viewpoint/Rest S Jp AL1BINATI WImo4 'nIIELL8' ~ _......OTOI' -- r.=~ ~I~~~~'~ , ~.a.:.:.1."CI 10.... &J::'~..7i' WAU. .. Typical Golf Course Viewpoint/Rest Stop 'tal Enlet i Ig Golf Course ( -- i "i I. II Ir .il _..=: ~-.:'..,:. -- , '-~ ~IC WAU( . .. .:., ',:' em Cross Section A-A .... at PubIc Street '. . - '""' ( .....-.. --- - .. ...- Closs Section B-B PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT +3 RESOLUTION NO. PCS-95-02 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR UNIT 15 AT EASTLAKE SOUTH GREENS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-02 WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on August 18, 1994 by EastLake Development Company ("Developer") and Western Salt Company ("Owner"), and WHEREAS, the Owner and Developer requested in said application approval to subdivide Unit 15 of Eastlake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3, located on the east side of South Greensview Drive south of Clubhouse Drive, into 68 lots containing a total of 64 dwelling units ("Project"); and WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-94-19, of possible adverse enviromnental impacts of the project was previously conducted in conjunction with the amendment to the EastLake II (EastLake I expansion) General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastLake Greens Master Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3) and Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program on IS-94-19 was adopted by the City Council on August 16, 1994; and WHEREAS, the Enviromnental Review Coordinator (ERC) has concluded that the proposed project implements and falls under the purview of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and that no new affects could occur and no new mitigation measures are required for PCS-95-02 and recommends readoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners and residents within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., December 21, 1994, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby readopts Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the project in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 21st day of December, 1994 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman ATTEST: Nancy Ripley, Secretary (f: \horne\planning\amyw\pcs95-02. per) DRAFT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION ATTACHMENT "4 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR UNIT 15 AT EASTLAKE SOUTH GREENS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-02, MAKING THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR IS-94-19 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, is commonly known as Unit 15 of EastLake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3; and for the purpose of general description herein consists of 11. 9 acres located on the east side of South Greensview Drive approximately 300 ft. south of Clubhouse Drive within the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community ("Project Site"); and, B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on August 18, 1994 EastLake Development Company ("Developer") and Western Salt Company ("Owner") filed a tentative subdivision map application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Unit 15 at EastLake South Greens, Chula Vista Tract 95-02 (known as Document No. on file with the office of the City Clerk) in order to subdivide the Project Site into 68 lots ("Project"); and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of 1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198 ("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199 ("SPA"); and 3) a Tentative Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15200 ("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan (AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16898 on November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, SPA, TSM, AQIP and WCP amendment previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994; and D. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said project on December 21, 1994, and voted to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed below. E. City Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on __mm_____, 1995, on the Project and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this project held on December 21, 1994, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. III. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FINDINGS; APPROVALS A. Mitigated Negative Declaration The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 (known as Document No. C094-180 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and comments thereon, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as Document No. C094-181 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior to approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a -2- significant effect on the environment and thereby readopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration. B. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that the significant environmental effect(s) identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be reduced to below a level of significance if the mitigation measures in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are implemented. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby readopted to ensure that its provisions are complied with. IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance with requirements ofthe California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 reflects the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council. VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for Unit 15 at Eastlake South Greens, Chula Vista Tract No. 95-02 is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: a. Land Use The proposed density of 5.4 du/ac is in compliance with the previously approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan density range (5-15 du/ac) for the subject parcel. b. Circulation All of the on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer in accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Financing Plan and Development Agreement. -3- The public streets within the subdivision will be designed in accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements. The adjoining street system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of traffic from this and other area projects. c. Housing The EastLake Greens SPA Plan area has been conditioned to provide a minimum of 10% affordable housing including a mix of housing types and lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various apartment densities that will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for persons of various incomes. The proposed single-family detached residential housing type is consistent with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan. d. Conservation The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for IS-94-19 addressed the goals and policies of the Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of this site to be consistent with these goals and policies. e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space The project site is located within the EastLake Greens SPA Plan area. The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open space consistent with City policies. The project will implement in part conditions of approval for the EastLake Greens SPA Plan requiring the provision/construction of a golf course trail. f. Seismic Safety The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site. g. Safety The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have. reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for emergency services. -4- h. Noise Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report SEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 adequately address the noise policy of the General Plan. All dwelling units within the project will be required to be designed so as to not exceed the interior noise level of 45 dBA. Additionally, all exterior private open space will be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to achieve a 65 dBA noise level for outside private areas. 1. Scenic Highway The project site is not located adjacent to any designated scenic highway but a landscaped open space buffer and a decorative wall will be provided along the South Greensview Drive frontage in order to enhance the appearance of the project from the street. J. Bicycle Routes Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned Community area design and are presently in use. The public streets within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel within the interior of the subdivision. k. Public Buildings No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits. B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources. C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the optimum siting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by Government Code Section 66473.1. D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects. -5- E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the foregoing Tentative Subdivision Map which is stated to be conditioned on "General Conditions" is hereby conditioned as follows: A. Project Site is Improved with Project Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 except as modified by this Resolution. B. Implement Mitigation Measures Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental Impact Report for Eastlake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19. C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, all portions of IS-94- 19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project. D. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project. Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval of the EastLake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3 established by Resolution No. 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989 and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and provisions of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned Community District Regulations, the Eastlake Greens Development Agreement, the Water Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the Public Facilities Financing Plan. E. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan -6- Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the EastIake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Ergineer to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision. F. Project Phasing Developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map, if phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps. The phasing plan shall include: a. A site plan showing the lot lines and lot numbers, the phase lines and phase numbers and number of dwelling units in each phase. b. A table showing the phase number, the lots included in the phase and the number of units included in each phase. Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit of development shall be as detennined by the City Engineer and Director of Planning. The City reserves the right to conditional approval of each final map with requirement to provide said improvements, facilities and/or dedications as necessary to provide adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments. The City Engineer and Planning Director may at their discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revisions. IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall: STREETS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND IMPROVEMENTS 1. Submit for approval by the City Engineer detailed improvement plans in accordance with Chula Vista Design Standards, Chula Vista Street Standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision Manual. Street sections shall comply with current City street design standards unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 2. Grant a 5.5' tree planting and maintenance easement to the City along Street "A" and "B". -7- 3. Grant a 10' general utility easement along the frontage with South Greensview Drive of Lots A, B, and C. 4. Submit hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry-lane calculations for Street "A" and "B". 5. Submit and obtain approval from the Director of Planning and City Engineer for street names. 6. Develop the golf course view corridor parcel (Lot D) in accordance with the Golf Course Trail conceptual development plan attached thereto and made a part thereon and construct all improvements indicated thereon concurrently with the improvement of Street "A" and "B". 7 . Provide temporary turnarounds for emergency vehicle access at all unit boundaries to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshal. 8. Provide minimum horizontal curve radii for all sanitary sewers of 200'. 9. Locate street lights to the satisfaction of the City traffic engineer. 10. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage facilities. GRADING/DRAINAGE 11. Submit for approval by the City Engineer a detailed grading plan in accordance with the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance 1741. 12. Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to the original document prepared by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer. 13. Obtain a letter of permission to grade for all off-site grading. 14. Show the cut/fill line on the grading plans and provide a list of lots indicating those lots located on cut, fill or transition. OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS 15. Golf course view corridor Lot D shall be privately maintained and shown on the final map to be granted to the development's homeowners' association pursuant to CVMC 18.20.150. -8- 16. Grant to the City a public access easement over Lot D. 17. Offer to grant in fee to the City Open Space lots A-C as shown on the approved tentative map. The City Clerk's statement on the final map shall indicate rejection of said lots subject to future acceptance in accordance with the State Map Act. 18. Submit a list of all facilities located in Open Space lots A -C proposed to be maintained by the existing Eastlake Maintenance District No. I. This list shall include a description, quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls, fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage structures and landscaping. Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for open space maintenance. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the number of acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the estimation of a maintenance budget thereof. 19. Pay additional fees on a fair-share basis into Assessment District Numbers 90-3, 91-1 or other applicable assessments districts due to a change in units approved subsequent to District formation as determined by the City Engineer. 20. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the project boundary. Request apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $40/unitl district to cover costs prior to approval of each final map. 21. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation DIF Fund, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the assessment district's Engineer's Report. 22. Submit all disclosure forms for the approval of the City Engineer. AGREEMENTS 23. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly -9- notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. 24. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from this project. 25. Agree to insure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista. MISCELLANEOUS 26. Submit a comprehensive landscape plan for Lot A, B, C and D to the City Landscape Architect for review and approval prior to approval of the grading plan. Submit detailed irrigation plans and water management guidelines for all landscaping in accordance with the Chula Vista Design Manual. The landscaping format for the project shall be in substantial conformance with Section 6.4 (General Landscape Concept) of the EastLake Greens SPA. 27. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD 1983). 28. Submit copies of each final map in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior to approval of each final map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of the final maps based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in duplicate on 5-114" or 3-112" HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each final map. 29. Update the Eastlake Greens Public Facilities financing Plan as required by Chapter V of said approved document. 30. Satisfy the requirement to pay the Transportation Development Impact Fees (TDIF) prior to final map approval if the fee is financed through an assessment district or pay the TDIF prior to issuance of building permits. X. CODE REQUIREMENT REMINDERS -10- 31. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the final map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista current standards, Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual. 32. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal Code requirements. 33. Pay the following fees prior to issuance of building permits in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy: a. Public Facilities Development Impact Fees. b. Signal Participation Fees. c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees. d. Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January I, 1995). e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows DIF. Pay the amount of fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. The developer is advised that fees periodically change, and that it is the developer's responsibility to contact the appropriate City department or government agency to ascertain the amount of a given fee due to the time of collection. 34. Install required fire hydrants prior to delivery of any combustible construction materials. 35. Provide a brush management plan and fire resistive landscaping within open space areas, as required by the Fire Marshal. XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No -11- vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of Determination and file the same with the County Clerk. XIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney (f:\home\planning\amyw\pcs95-02.ccr) -12- ~I~' "10 n ~ 1 :D '" .. ~ 001 " .. .. " D . n ~ C1R. ~ I. COM _ADOW I'L. I .. IILAIe ..... EASTLAKE RESIDENTIAL 10.5 DU / AC ELEMENTARY SCHOOl SITE ~ PROJECT LOCATION _/ ~ CITY COUNTY CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR APPlICANT: WESTERN SALT CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SUBDMSION C) ADDRESS: South of ClubhDuse Dr. and Request: 68 lot subdivision. So. Greensview Dr. Intenec:tion SCALE: FILE NUMBER: NORTH NONE PCS-95-02 - Exhibit A 18-94-19 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGA TION MONOTORING PROGRAM ATTACHMENT +5 ""- . - - Mitigated Negat.ve Declaratio r:>/1p-( PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA and the fonnation of an Assessment District for various public improvements PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastlake Development Company CASE NO: IS-94-19 DATE: February 28, 1994 A. Proiect Settinl! The project site located south of Dtay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte Parkway and this general vicinity (EastIake and Otay Ranch) do not involve any substantial soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is an air quality lion-attainment basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling unit increase because of the expansion in land area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality. However, because the increase in the projected units is more than SO, compliance with the City requirement for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, this less-than- significant impact will be further reduced. The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek and Salt Creek drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may nee4 additional cumulative capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boundary but the impacts of this project would not be significant These drainage courses do not enter any potable water sources nor are they a significant source of any ground water. . This property has been used for agricultural purposes for many w.tI~s and is void of any significant vegetation or animal life. The project could affect raptor habitats but given the limited acreage this is not significant There are various streets in the project _ which have 1raftic volumes that may result n adverse noise levels. Once precise pad elevations ~Iativc to street elevations are known, specific mitigation wiIl be identified and implemented. This residential project will Dot result in any significant sources of light or glare. The project as proposed is consistent with the other low-medium densities adjacent to and in the vicinity of the project site and the population levels are consistent with the project area. Public facilities and services including transportation are available and adequate to ~~~ the project site and vicinity. :::'-J_-= ~=t~~ city of chura vl,ta planning department 01Y OF envlronmenta. review aectlon. OfULA VISTA The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant paleontological resourceS. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non- graded areas. Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously implemented. . B. Proiect DescriDtion General DescriDtion The project is an amendment to the adopted Eastlake I General Development Plan (GDP), which includes EastLake Greens; an amendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan (SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City of Chula Vista. The amendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the following two categories: 1. Amending the GDP/SPA to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General Plan Amendment east of the SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels R-IO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units). 2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refmements with no net increase of density. 3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake II) for the installation of public facilities to serve the project. Included is Table I, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which summarizes the proposed residential changes. DescriDtion of Land SwaD Area Amendment Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this amendment. The balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and Eastlake), which was recently the subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be covered by a separate amendment. The purpose of including the areas in this proposed amendment separately is because they are logical expansions of existing parcels within the Eastlake Greens SPA plan. The parcels that are expanded by the recent GPA include Parcels R-I0, R-20 and R- 23. Upon favorable action, these areas are proposed to be annexed to the City of Chula Vista. Following is a description of each of these parcels: R-10: The rea1ignment of Orange Avenue to the south expanded this parcel's boundary. These expanded areas were designated Low- Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of the density range (4.5 dulac) is being proposed. The total increase for this parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and 12 du in areas previously indicated as Orange AvenucIFuture Urban). Pile 2 Yil'CF:~\136.M . ., "DoBLE 1 BastLake Greens site utilization Plan Existing Residential Land V.e statietica Parcel Density Acres '1'arget '1'arget Number Ranae Densitv Units R-1 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83 R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88 R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65 R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 R-10 '5-15 27.9 6.0 167 R-11 5-15 14.6 6.3 92 R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 U R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84 R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88 R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214 R-18 5-15 51.9 8.8 87 R-19 5-15 14.51 10.6 158 R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164 R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146 R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205 R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50 R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74 R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 60 R-27* 25+ 8.51 4.5 40 R-28* 25+ ft.1 ...!5 27 '1'O'1'AL 412.4 8C 2774 du -Interim De.ignation ,. - -... - . -"- .. '!'ABLE 2 Bast:Lake Greens site utilization Plan ~oposed lt8Sidential Land V.a statiniCl! Parcel Density Acres '1'arqet '1'arqet %ncraase(+) Humber R8nae Densitv units Decrea8e(-\ Jt-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0 Jt-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0 R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19 R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0 R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0 R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0 R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5 R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 516 0 R-9. 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0 R-I0 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +79 R-11 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5 R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 513 0 R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0 R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2 R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23 R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0 R-17 5-15 "29.7 7.2 214 0 R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0 R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0 Jt-20 5-15 15.7 51.2 153 +11 R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0 R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5 R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +9 R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 46 -4 R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4 Jt-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60. 0 Jt-27 0-5 8.9 4.9 44 +4 R-28 5-1!5 6.1 g.R' 60 +~~ '1'ODL 434.1 ac 6.6 2871 du +517 .XnteriJR Desiqnation: parcel .ubject 'to ~uture SPA Amendment to be consistent with the General Plan. ," 1-11-94 ~ ~"..- . " R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the SDG&E easement. The new area is computed at the mid-point of the Low-Medium density range (4.5 dulac). A reduction is proposed for the parcel as a whole to reflect cunent planning/marketing. R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20, except that no decrease in the density is proposed. A net increase of 9 units are proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA. A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels. Description of Density Transfers This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA boundary to reflect current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of units (2774 du) previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density transfers. Refer also to Table 2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land Swap Areas. Parcel Number R-3 R-7 R-ll R-14 R-15 R-20 R-22 R-24 R-25 R-27 R-28 TOTAL DU Increase DU Decrease +19 -5 -s +2 -23 -20 -5 -4 +4 +4 +33 +62 -62 Description of Assessment District Work The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following: 1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewa1k, street lighting and landscaping within the following rights-of-way: L South Greensview Drive fiom Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 Clltrance (2,400 L.F., Phase 1). b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2). 'c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to SiIverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). WPCF:~1736.94 Poae3 2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, stann drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities, telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way: a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.F., Phase I). b. South QreensView Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2). c. South Greensvicw Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). 3. DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading, stann drain, base, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting, landscaping and street monumentation within the following rights-of-way: a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensvicw Drive (2,300 L.P., Phase 2). 4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and stann drain improvements within the following rights-of-way: a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F., Bhase 2). b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F., Phase 2). Discretionarv Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area 1. General Development Plan Amendment 2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment 3. Modification to the Eastlake Greens Site Utilization Plan 4. Establishment of District 94-1 5. Annexation 6. Tentative Subdivision Map 7. Design Review C. ComDatibilitv with Zoninl! and Plans The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an ernendment to the more specific land use regulations of the EastJake Greens General Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA). D. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached Environmental Checklist Fonn) determined that the proposed project could have one or WPC F,1IIOME\I'I.ANNI1736.M hac 4 > - " more significant environmental effects, Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached as Attachment "A". The following impacts are those that were determined to be potentially significant and are required to be mitigated to a level below significant. A discussion of each of these potentially significant but mitigatable impacts ftom the proposed project follows. Acoustics The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level. E. Mitil!ation necessarv to avoid sil!Ilificant effects Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below significant.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Attachment "A"). At the time of consideration 'of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this infonnation, it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. F. Consultation I. Individuals and Or2anizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken LIrsen, Director of Building &. Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Crime Prevention, Marylane Diosdada Marty Schmidt, Parks &. Recreation Dept. Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney ,. Pile 5 WPC F:IIIOME\I'I.ANIICM736.94 .. - " Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti Cinti Land Planning 3625 Midway Dr., #292 San Diego, CA 92110 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989) Chula Vista Municipal Code Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, EastLakeDevelopment Co. regarding sewage generation in sewage basins, improvements and rmancing Letter dated February 7, 1994, Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the adequacy of drainage systems Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlaefli, Vice President Urban Systems Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Deparbnent, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. {/).~I ENVIRO AL REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 5/93) WPCF:~1736.94 hie 6 , Attachment A MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM MITIGATION MEASURE At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time. the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. MONITORING REOUIREMENT Prior to g~anting a tentative subdivision map or design review approval. a noise study forecasting noise levels and the appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required. ..... ...... ~11 ..... ...""\A... ..... ...... ~ ...... I ..... I - ...... ..... IE 5-1 ..... ou ..... ..... "f\...2~.1Ii ..... os., ...... ..... 5-2 PO-I I" j'\ LE.G.Em! MfA OF DENSITY TRANSFER . ADDED TO SPA BOUNDARY CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT iC) APPLICANT: Eastlake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: .. EASTLAKE GREENS ADDRESS: 900 LaDe AnDue General Development Plan Amendment SCALE: FILE NUMSER: and SPA Amendment l ~()Rm NO SCALE 18-94-19 Case No. 15-94-19 APPENDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKUST FORM (To Bt Compkted By Lead Agency) Background 1. Name of Proponent: Eastlakt Develot1ment Co. 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 900 Lent Avt.. Suite 100. ChuIa Vista. CA 91913 3. Datt of Checklist: Februarv 24. 1994 4. Name of Proposal: .Eastlakt Greens ODPISPA Amendment S. Jnitial Study Number: 15-94-19 Environmental Impacts 1. Earth. Will tht proposal result in: m. )lAYBE JjQ a. Unstabk urth conditions or changts in geologic substructures? C C . b. Disruptions, displacemenu, compaction or overcovmng of tht soil? C . C c. Changt in topography or ground surface relief featureS? C . C d. The desuuction, covmng or modification of any unique geologic or physical featureS? C C . e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of .oils, eithm' on or off the site? C . C f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands. or changes in siltation. deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of . rivm' or stream or die bed of the ocean or any bay. inlet or lake? C C . I. Exposure of people or }'loperty to FOlogic hazards such as earthquakes. landslides. mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? C C . . wpc~(N73UO ..... 7 g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? o . o Comments: The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no fmding of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized and more specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City of Chula Vista General Plan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR (1985), EastIake Greens SPA & EastLake Trails Prezone & Annexation FSEIR (1989), and Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division. There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features. 2. Air. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE !ill a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? o o . b. The creation of objectionable odors? o o . c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? o o . Comments: The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would result in an increase of 97 units within the EastIake Greens SPA. The emissions from the traffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant when considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the emissions from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant. 3. Water. Will the Proposal result in: ~ MAYBE l!!Q a. Changes in currents, or the course or d~onofwatermovements,in~thu marine or fresh waters? o o . b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? o . o c. Alterations to the course or flow or flood waters? o o . Po&e 8 WI'C P,IHoIdElP1AllNINGI1736.M \ e. Discharge into surface waters, or any alteration of surface water quality, including but not limited to temperature. dissolved oxygen or turbidity? [] [] . f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? [] [] . g. O1ange in the quantity of ground waters. either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? [] [] . h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? [] [] . L Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves'? [] [] . Comments: The project site" and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh water areas, flood waters, water bodies, or known ground water. There will be a minor change in absorption late which will result in minor-Iess-than-significant change in runoff (see Jetter from Dennis C. Bowling dated 2(194). .. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: m MAYEE NO a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including tteeS, shrubs, grass. crops, and aquatic plants)? D D . b. Reduction of the numbezs of any unique. lire or endangered species of plants? [] [] . c. Introduction of new species of plants into into an area. or in a baDier to the normal sq>lenishment of existing species? D D . d. Reduction in acreage of any agricuhura1 crop? D D . Comments: The project site has been used for agricu1tura1 pmposes for decades and portions are now graded ind some areas have been developed (uansfer area). This general area is used as Raptor territory, however, with only I 22.7 acre increase in SPA ~. this is not significant wpc~INm.M ",9 \ S. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: m MAYBE .l!Q. L Otange in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animals (birds, land animals including reptiles. fish and shellfish. benthic organisms or insects)? [] [] . b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals? [] [] . c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the migration or movement of animals? .[] [] . d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife habitat? [] [] . Comments: The project site has been used for agricultura1 pUIpOses for decades and portions are now graded and some areas have been developed (tranSfer area). 1bis general area is used as Raptor tenitory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size. this is not significanL 6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: m J:1:AYBE lK! L In~ases in existing noise leve1s? [] [] . b. Exposure of people to severe noise leve1s? [] . [] Comments: Tnffic volumes on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could ina9se ambient noise to an unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Otula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With this infonnation it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise Icvc.ls IIId the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to !educe Doise levels IIId the appropriate mitigation measures ncceswry to reduce noise kveh to an acceptable 6S exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based 01\ the latest buiJdoat traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 6S exterior dBA (CNEL) . IIIIDdard. ,. Paac 10 WI'C~CN736.!N 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce DeW light or glare? m MAYBE NO [J [J . Comments: This is primarily . residential project that will not produce my significant new light or glare. If there are my unique sources proposed or established. they will be regulated through the performance standards in the Municipal Code. 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in . substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of m area? m. ~YBE m [J [J . Comments: The proposed project is in . planned community which is internally consistent that assures land use compatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical boundaries (the SDG&E transmission lines md East Orange Avenue). The overall external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay Ranch, Otay Water District facilities md SR 125 alignmenL 9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in: m MAYBE m a. Increase in the rate of use of my natural resources? [J [J . Comments: There are no other natural resources such IS sand md gravel on site which would be impacted by the proposed project. 10. Risk or Upset. Will the proposal involve: m ~YBE m a. A risk of 811 explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides. chemicals or radiation) in the event of m accicJent or upset conditions? [J [J . b. Possible intco.t...Cllce with 811 ern..rgcncy response plan or 811 err~5ency evacualion plan? [J .[J . Comments: Given 1he residential character of the project there wID be DO involvement of bazardous materials above that typical of . residential land use. The project will provide adequate. circulation in the case of the need for D evaco,.ti"" or response plan. " J'a&ell wpc~CN736.M . < ... .. ~ . . ~ .. \ 11. Population. Will me proposal alter me location distribution, density. or growth rate of me human population or an area'? .m MAYBE 1ill c c . Comments: The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent with planning for this area. 12. Housin&. Will me proposal affect existing housing. or create a demand for additional housing'? .m 1-1'" YBE 1ill c c . Comments: The distribution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than create housing demands in this area. 13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: .m MAYBE 1ill a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement'? C C . b. Effects on existing parking facilities. or demand for new parking'? C C . c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems'? C C . d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or movement of people and/or goods'? C C . e. Alterations to waterborne. rail or air traffic'? C C . f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor vdUcles. bicyclists or pedestrians'? C C . I. A "large project" under me Congestion Management Program'? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vdUcle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips). C C . Comments: The project will not result in any significant impact to tranSportation/circulation/tra (see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer. dated 2121194. and letter from Andy Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates. dated 2/18194). wpc~CN7H.M p. 12 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: .m MAYBE !ill L Fire protection'? See page 6 of Appendix m of the C C . Initial Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept) and 16 Thresholds L Fire/EMS below. b. Police protection'? See comments in O1ula Vista Police DepL Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recommendation dated 214194 and 16 Thresholds b. C C . c. Schools'? EastLake Development Co. has made the Eastlake projects participate in Community Facilities Districts in me Sweetwater Union High School District, and the Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate school services in the area. C C . d. Parks or other recreational facilities'? The project will be ~uired to provide adequate community and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project. See Initial Study. Appendix m, Parks & Recreation Dept., page 7. Also see 19 Recreation below. C C . e. Libraries'? The City of O1ula Vista currently operates a library at the campus of the Eastlake High School during the hours the school library is not in operation. On a longer term basis. mere is a ~uirement for a library site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to finance the facility. C C . f. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads'? There will be no substantial or unique impact 011 the maintenance of m public facility as a result of the minimal increase in usage due to this project. C C . g. Other governmental services'? Other governmental agencies were notified and contaeted during the Initial Study; DO other potential impacts were identified. C C . IS. EDerv. Will the proposal resuh in: m. JdAYBE !ill L Use of substantial amount of fuel or energy'? C C . ," wpc__CN7H.M ....13 . ~ " b. Substantial increase in demand upon existing sources or energy, or ~uire the development of new sources of energy'? c c . Comments: The project would result in a minor increase in energy ~uirements typical of a primarily residential project. This will not result in a substantial use of fuel or energy Dor new sources of energy. 16. Thresbolds. Will the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards'? m MAYBE 1ill C c . Comments: As described below, die proposed project does not adversely impact any of die seven Threshold Standards. A. FirelEMS The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within S minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of O1u1a Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is one mile away and would be associated with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See Appendix m to the Initial Study, page 16. B. Police The Threshold Standards ~uire that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or Jess and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 45 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or Jess. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See comments in O1ula Vista Police Dep..tu.eot Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review Recommendation dated 214194. c. Traffic The Threshold Standards teCJUire that all interseCtions must opeDte . a Level of Service (LOS) .C" or better, wish 1he exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during die peak two hours of the day . signalized interseCtions. Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate. a LOS below 1heir 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "Y' during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. WI'C~CN7H.M .... 14 The project will not result in any significant impact to transportation/circu1ation/traffic (see memo from Harold Rosenberg. Traffic Engineer, dated 2121194, and letter from Andy Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associ~s, dated 2118194). D. parksIRecreation The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acresIl,(XX> population. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. The project will be ~uired to provide adequate community and neighborhood parks to aerve the population of the project E. Drainage The Threshold Standards ~uire that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements cOI1sistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See letter from Dennis C. Bowling. Director Water Resources Division,m Rick Engineering, dated 2{1/94.; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2123/94. F. Sewer The Threshold Standards require Ihat sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements cOI1sistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. See letter from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, Eastlake Development Co., dated 219/94; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2123194. G. Water The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment. and transmission facilities are constructed c:onc:urrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construetiOl1. The plc.posed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water c:oriservation or fee off-set program the City of 01u1a Vista has in effect 11 the time of building permit issuance. 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: 1m. ~YBE IiQ. L Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding mental health'? c c . ....15 wpc~CN7H.M \ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards'? c c . Comments: The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard or an exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in 'I above. 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: .m MAYBE 1ill L The obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view'? C C . b. The destruction, or modification of a scenic route'? C C . Comments: The project will not obstruct any public view or vistas, create any demonstrable negative aesthetic effect or, at this level of review, impact a scenic route. 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities'? m. MAYBE 1ill c c . Comments: The project will be ~uired to meet the recreational needs of its residents in accordance with City park standards which include recreational facility standards. 20. Cultural Resources. m MAYBE 1ill L Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destrUction or a prehistoric or historic an:haeologica1 site? C C . b. Will the proposal resuh in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, 1t1'\ICtUJ'e, or object'? C 'C . c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cuItural values'? C C . d, Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area'? C C . WPC I':'aONE'fI,A!ICN7H.M p. 16 e. Is the area identified on the City's " General Plan EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources'? ( c c . Comments: See Section S.2.3 (pg. S-3) of EIR.,86-4 (Sch: 860S2803). 21. Paleontoloaica1 Resources. Will the proposal resuh in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources'? . m fo{A YBE 1ill c c . Comments: See Section 4.7 (pg. 407S) of EIR-86-4 (Sch: 860522803). 22. Mandatory Fmdin&S or Sipificance. XES. MAYBE ~ L Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant animal or eliminate important examples or the major periods of California histO!)' or prehistO!)''? c c . Comments: As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any biological resources and therefore, would have no significant impact on any of these resources. Cultural resources (prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitigated and no further action is necessary. b. Does me project have the potential to achieve short-term goals to the disadvantage of long- term, environmental- goals'? (A short-term impact on me environment is one which occurs in a relatively trief, definitive period of time, while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) D D . Comments: The l"oposed project conform to the 01ula Vista Genenl Plan IIId therefore, ~ project complies with the long term goals of the City of 01u1a Vista for the site. ....17 WPC I':'iIDNE'l'INOCN7H.M .' ,~ " c, Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively cmsiderable'? (A project may impact two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small. but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant.) c c . Comments: The project impacts lire so limited to preclude any significant cumulative impact In the case of air quality impacts, the increase of 97 units, or a maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the existing, and approved units and ADT, the impact is minimal and less than significant Also, the site is void of any significant biological or cultural resources and paleontological resources will be fully mitigated. d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly'? c c . Comments: At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review, supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to O1ula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time me precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 6S exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of me 6S exterior dBA (CNEL) standard. ,. P.,e18 wpc~CN7H.M . . " Mitiption Measures (To be completed by the Applicant) I, as owner/owner in escrow. &uc! N. S<.o~tV S.R. "P!<f)':l ~It EI!<;rt Ad 7)Ev {D, Print name or I, coosuJtant or agent. ~m......."""""""" ..... ___. z Iz~ 1T'f Signature Date Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: C I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. . I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to die project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. C I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the enviromnent. and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACI' REPORT is required. ~~rr1'1 . ~ ;if.,:,,:I-I~~) Envtt'01UllCl1tal ReVlew or Date "'If acting foe a c:arporation. include capacity lOCI company name. ,. wpc~CNm.M .... 19 Case No. ':T,~' q 4 - 1"1 APPENDIX n DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION (01apter 1706, StatUtes of 1990 . AB 31S8) . 11 is hereby found 1hat this project involves no potential for 8IIY adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife mources and 1hat a "Certificate of Fee Exemption" shall be prepared for this project. 11 is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife, individually or cumulatively and merefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. ~....,.~ ->-e ~d 'Q^.e.:>'c..:>s."-' ..;:i~~~.. ~, R ~C'\ ~Lo.~ G\~ ~.~~~~~~~~~ 9\~~. ~ rt,;./(-fCd)~) Environmental Revi w Coordinator CJ);J~/'7 V Date ,. ....20 WPC Jl:'RQIoIE'ILANIIINCN7H.M . ". . \ - . Case No. I~-q"-I't APPENDIX III CITY DATA SHEET PLANNING DEPARTMENT n. ,pment Zoninl! on site:--5'c.. (~I!ht.- ..~.~ Norah . ., S~th h I. East I, II West ~ " Does the project conform to die c:unent zoning' J: -- ~ ~. 4~ . -1.0' "'f'~~ .~ L....,~4c.) general Plan land use ~::ati~~ ~it~ ::~~ - j~~':...~:~~;;:; ~~~<J~,E~ South East ..;u....., _ ~.(l~ I!I.._~~ A.... A....7..A a-e "Dv~~ West _.. ;"'7: II " ~ fIaJ,4; IJ.~~--- I ~ ~ Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram' ~'~ ~ Is die project area designated for conservation or open space or adiacent to III CU 10 designated'? - ~ L ~.--~.- Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes'? ,...1.. -,... (1f "'~ """ '" p . ." ....." "" """, .,..,., or .. -;'. ;:~~~'~'::'_.I'~L. ifhools . m. If Ibe proposed project is residential, please complete the following: UDlts 0aIeJaIiDI FIClIn SbldeDts Qeuerated I=mm Proiect IV. School S.........my s.A-l * ., ~ f Jaior Hip ~V'..;~ SeDlar HiJh ~u. L- '17 Iemarb: '~:= ~s . ~ ~ ~ ~ ./1 ~IU~ ...::J - ~ . 1"; :- Clftldtv mnml1ment ......1Sed - - 117 If' .JO .:l9 . .10 2." ~~ .0 >>:/[1. ~/1.!/ ~ __~_ U~___ ..__.___.___J IMIM,1aJ Ifdfll'1~ 1'1&&1 ~ - ~ ,., ,- '\ INITIAL STUDY ;Fac>rtijU~~' '.CaSeNo: s- ....~.. !l?Pst;~t7<4~ ReCeipt NO'fi... )>ateRCc:~d. ... . ;;~%7P~ ~y '1)~\ ~Je;t1'lo.FA. .; tppst:Ji~;;t?Q'...~ 0, 'PPNo:-""" ,..\... .......; :.._Il.~~.iiiiA::'.~ ~'?~.:':' __ .-_' '-, '":;.:.,. . .::' ,:";.. .' :<", '.~ :-t, .~::~::,. ..:::'", ., ,. ,. .. .. .. ~: . . APPUCATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN IS FOLDED TO AT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER i \. City of O1ula Vista Application Form A. BACKGROUND 1. Project Title Eastlake Greens GDP /SPA Amendment 2. . Project Location (Street address or description)East of SR-125, North of. orange Ave, South of otay Lakes Rd./ Telegraph Canyon Rd., . and West of Hunte Parkway. Assessors Book, Page" Parcel No. NA 3. Brief Project Description The proj ect is a transfer of D. U. wi thin the existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) and an expans~on of the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 du).Refer to attached Project Descril 4. Name of Applicant Eastlake Development Company Addless 9.00 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax#421..,1B30 Phone 421-0127 City Chula vista State CA Zip 91913 S. Name of Preparer/Agent Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning Addless 3625 Midway Dr., '292 Fax# 223-510B Phone 223-7408 . City San Diego State CA Zip 92110 Relation to Applicant Land Planning Consultant 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by die Environmental Review Coordinator. L Permits or approvals required. _ CIeDeraI Plan Amendment ~~. _ Grading Pamit -'- ICIIIali~e Pan:cI Map _ Site Plan It Arch. Review . ____ SpecIal Use Pamit ~ Design Review Application X Tentative SubcL Map . _ Redevetopn-~ ArPti OPA _Rcdcv~ Aat:lll:y DDA ~ Public Project +- A1--'{OIinr\ _ SpecifIC Plan ~ Cooditiaoal Use Pamit _ Variance _ Coastal DcvetOpncnt ~ OIlIer Pamit ~'tfI . ~ If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or 1WIIIe, please indicate die chanse in desipltion from to b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). ( _ Grading Plan _ Parcel Map , Precise Plan = Specific Plan _ Trafrlc ImpICl Report _ Hazardous Was\e A.sscssmcnt Arch. Elevations . - Landscapl' Plans = Tentative SubcLMap _ Improvement Plans _ Soils Report _ Ocolcclrical Report _ Hydrologicsl Study _ Biologicsl Study _ An:baeologicsl Study _ Noise Arsu,ment _ OIlIer Alt:III:y Permit ~OdIcr Project Des~ript1 . -. \ . ..- . B. PROPOSED PROJECT J. a. 161.4 (amend. area) Land Area: square footage or8creage8r;~.2 (SPA area) If land area to be dedicated. state acreage ~d purpose. . b. Does the project involve the c:onstruction of neW bJildings, or wiD existing structure be vUUud? Yes, see Project Description. 2. Complete this section if project is residential or mixed use. L Type of deve1op~ Single Family _ Two Farnily --.:. Multi Family _ Townhouse _ Condominium . . b. Total number of structures 2871 residential du permittted c. Maximum height ofstruc:tures varies per P.C. District Regulations d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom ...BL 2 bedroom JiL 3 bedroom ....BL .. bedroom .liA- Total Units iUl e. Gross density (DU/tOtallCreS) 3.4 f. Net density (DU/total acres miniJs any dedication) 6.6 g. EsIimated project population to be determined h. Eslimated sale or rental price range to be determined i. Square footage of structure to be determined . . j. Pcn::ent of lot coverage by buildings or structures per P.C: Regulations Ie. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided per P.C. Requ1ations L Pcn::ent of site in road and paved surface to be determined X' Complete this section if project is commercial or indu5trial or mixed use. L Type(s) of land use b. floor I,I'ea Heiiht oflQ1JCCUteS(s) Co Type" of construction used jn the IIrUCtUre d. De:saibe ~ access points to the ItnICCunIS and the orieobtion to 8djoiniaa properties aDd ~ Co Number of on-site paddng spaces provided f. Estimated IJumber of emplo~ per shift Number of shifts Total .. . Estimared number of ~Omell (per day) and basis of estimate . . .. - Hours of operation Type of exterior lighting 2<- , . If project is other than residential, c:ommen:ial or industrial complete this section. , a. Type of project . h. i j~ .k. L , ' Estimated number of deliveries per day Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate Typelextent.of operations not in enclosed buildings b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - Dwdmum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces b. Additional PT?ject c:haracteristics C. PROJEcr CHARACTERISTICS 1. Will the project be required to obtain a permit through me Air Pollution Control District (~)? No. 2. Is ~y type of grading or ~vatiOl1 of the property anticipated? Yes, based on future If " th Ii II . . . aubmittaJ.s. yes, comp.ete . e 0 owmg: a. Excluding traIChes to be backfilled. bow many.cubic yards of eII'th wID be excavated? NA b. How many cubic yards of fill will'be placed? NA co. How much area (sq. It. or aaes) wiD be IJ'Ided? NA d. What will be the: ~ deplh of cut NA . Average depth.of cut RA Maxirnum.depth of fill NA . Average depth of fill RA "'3 .~D2I-A.tJca.t loafJlcw.IClZ2.tJI f 3. Describe. all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (air conditioning. electrical appliance. heating equipment, etc.) Nnrm~' TP~idential enerav use. 4. Indicate Ihe amount of awural open space that is pan of ~ project (sq. ft. or acres) None. 5.. If the project will result in any employment opportunities desaibe the IWUre and type of these . jo~. Construction related jobs. '. 6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances -be used or stored within , . the project site'? NA 7. How DWlY estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? None in exc~ss of those addressed in previous.EIR. $. Describe Cd any) off-siteimprovements 1H'"",,,ary to imp~t the project, and their points of . access or COMeCtion to the project site. Improvements include but DOt limited to the follo~ing: .DeW streets; street ~idening; extension of gas, eleCtric, and sewer Jines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of those J)reviouslv . identified for EastLake Greens. (refer ~o E8R~LAke Grppn~PFFP). D. pESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SE'ITING 1. . GeololZV Has a geology study been conducted On the propeny? Yes, see Ea.Uake Greens EIR. . (If yes, please attach) Has a soils report on Ihe project site been made? Yes. see EasUake Greens EIR. (If yes, please attach) 2. HvdrololZV . Are any of dle following features present on CII' adjacent to Ihe site? (If yes. explain in cIetail.) L. Is there any surface evidence of a sbalIow powKf water table? No.. .~ wPOI'.J~. PND2I.r..ncw.~I"(IIotltIZ2.fJ) ?!F. " b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site'? In previously approved facilities. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? No. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas'? Potential exists but would be mitigated by conditions to future T.T. map , . bescribe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. To be determined bv future submittals and previously approved tract map. c. d. e. 3. ~oise a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may impact the project site'? No. Future arterials may impact some areas. b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single- family residences)'? No. 4. Biolol!:V L Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No. b. Is the project site in a natUral or partially natUral ~e'? No . c. If yes, has a biologica1 survey been coDducted 011 die property'? Yes x No (please attach a COpY.)Refer to previous EIR. d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the project Site is semi- developed with remnants of previous dry farming/cattle grazing on. the remainders S. Past Use of the Land L Are there any known historical or ucheological resources IocIted 011 or near the project site? No. b. . Are there any known paleontological reSources? No. Co Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored 011 ~ near the project site'? No. d~ What was the land previously used fotl Dry farming ICattle grazing ,. I , _ . ~. 6. Current Land Use L Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. **See answer below** 7. b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent propeny. North Eastlake Business Center 0 South Vacant Otay Ranch - Future development East Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoods 1West Eastlake High School/community Park and Future deve~opmer Sooal . Are tho id ~o..ne on parcels proposed fQr an increase L ere My RS ents 01\ sne1.. If 10, bow many'l....1n units. b. Are there any current empl0ymc0t opportunities 01\ site? No. If 10, how many Md what type? 8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the proposCdproject. Sites have been fully evaluated in Eastlake Greens SPA ErR and recent General Plan Amendment ErR for Land Swap areas. See also attached Project Description for .ddit1ona~ aa~a. **Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half of EastLake Greens. Parcels proposed for amend- ment with existing structures are only being amended to reflect existing conditions with no increase in units. . ,. WI'QI...~OlI~._I_93iI8o:Um.w .I'.a&.6 . . .. , --- .- . - . " E. CERTIFICATION 1, as ownerIowner in esaow. RA~~]AKe "Development Company Eru.ce Sloan. Proi ect Manager Print name or 1, consuhant or agent. Print name HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all Iespec:ts true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its letting has been included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for auachments thereto. . ~ Owner/Owner in Escrow Signature or ~ or Alent Signature . / It) /'1t! I r Date -If acting for a corPOration. include capacity and company name. \ INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENT Name or Applicant Eastlake Development Company Address: 900 'Lane Ave., 5te. 100 SIaIe CA Sloan Pbone 421 -01 27 Zip 91913 Cil)': Chula Vista Name 01 AathorizecI RqIrc:Ic:nIative ('ar IiJllAlOrY): "!"lIce Address: Qnn T.JlJlnp Av~. _ st~ 100 City . I"''h,,':r. "01 et-s Aar=nent Date: Deposit Amount S 7 5 0 .00 This Apement ("A&!ee..leolt; beI_eeII Ihe Cit)' 0I0uIa Vista, a d\ar1a'ed municipal corpanIIion ("at)'") end Ihe forawned applicant for.. Initial Stud)' (" Applicantj, dfective as of die A&reaDa Dale .. bill aiIove, Ii IIIIIde with reference to Ihe foUowinl fac1s: SIaIe CA Phone 4" _0127 Zip 91913 Whereas, the Applicant lias applied to Ihe City for an Initial Stud)' of the type afonrefm:nced ("Initial Stud)'; which the Cit)' lias Rquired 10 be obtained as a condWon 10 pennillinllhe App1icant to devdop a parcel or poopeit)'; and. Whereas, Ihe City will incur ~ In order 10 process said Initia1 Stud)' throulh Ihe wrious departmenIs mid before the vlrious boards mid commissions or Ihe City ("}\.....-b'1 Services;: and. Whereas, the purpose of Chis .,.eement is 10 reimburse Ihe Cil)' for all expenses It will incur In connectia1 with providinl the Proc:essinl Services; Now, lhercrore. the parties do bereb)' agree. In cxdIanae for Ihe mutual promises IIerein contained. as follows: L Applicant's Dul)' 10 Pa)'. The Applicsnt IhalI pa)' all or the City's expenses incurred in provid!nl Processinl Service IdaIed 10 applicant's Initial Stud)', includinl all of 1he Cil)"s direct mid ovatIead COSIJ rcIaIed 1bereIO. This duty of Ihe Applicsnt sh:IlI be referred 10 bereIn as Ihe "App1icant's Dul)' 10 Pa)'." A. Applicant's Deposit Dut)' As p:II1iaI performance of Ihe Applicant's Duty 10 Pay, the AppUC:IlIIUlaall depoIit Ihe .-sit aforerefemlCCd ("DeposIt;' 1. The City sh:IlI dl:qe lis lawrul Gpenses inc:urred in provid!n, ".xessinJ Sc:rvicts 'apilllt Ihe Applicant'. Deposit If, aflef Ihe conc:lusion of...A6SiaI,1he Applicllnt's Initial Study, Sly portion ollhe Deposit remains, Ihe City aI1aIIlelllnllBid baiance 10 1he App1icant witbout InIeresI &bInon. 11. 6Irina the Phx:eainl 0I1he Applicant'. Initial Stud)', the amount of Ihe DeposIt bec:omes exhIIusIcd. or is amineall)' 1ikeI)' 10 become ahllllSled in Ihe opinion ol1he Cit)', upon IIOIice 01_ by Ihe City,lhe ~.1hII\I friwith ..a.ide IUCh additionlll deposit as 1he Cit)' aI1aII eVo.I..~ as 1'C8IOIIabI)' ,,~ ry 10 aJIItinue 10 proWSe "~Ia Sc:rvIc:a. TIle duly ollhe Applic:llnl1o iniIi:I1I)' deposit mid 10 IUppIement aaid depoIiIas bereIn required IhaII be bowD aslhe "Applicant's DeposIt Duty". D. Cil)". Duty ,. '!be City ahaII. upon Ihe condition dill! the Applic:ant is not In bRac:h air 1he Applic:anl'. Duty 10 Pay or Ihe App1ic:ant's Deposit Dut)', use JOOd faith 10 povide p~ r '" aervic:a In relation to Ihe ~i~'II'S Initial Stud)' applic:lllion. . . . ..._........~. ~ - -- ,-- ~-. ,--- -.- _... ~.............~- _.~, -~-,..-....... -. A. The City shall have no liability hereunder to the Applicant for &he failure 10 process &he Applicant's lnilial SlUdy applicalion, or for fail= 10 process &he Applicant's Initial Study willlin lIIe time frame requeslCd by die Applicant or cstinwed by the City. B. By exC(:ution or Ibis qreement.&he Applicant shall have DO nlht 10 direct or otherwise influence die conduct of the lnilial Study for wbich die applicant bas applied. The City shall use its disaeliOll ill evaluatinlthe Applicant's Initial Study applicalion without IepJ'd 10 the Applicant's pomise 10 pay Cor die P.o.,essinl Services, or IhC ew~)Vfion or &he ApemenL m. Remedies A. Suspensiorl of Processinl III .....1.iorI eo all OCher ri&hlS and ranedia wbich the City shall ocherwiIe have at law or equity, Ihe City bas the riaht 10 suspend aMlor withhold the pi [[ ''11 01 the Initial-Study wIUch i: &he subject matter of Ibis Apa!ment. as well as die Initial Study which may be die subject matter of any other I'trmil which Applicant bas before die City. B. CivU CoUection In addilion 10 all other rilhlS and remedies which die City IhalI ocherwiIe have all law or equity, the City h:Is &he right 10 IXIUect all sums wIUch are or may become due hereunder by civil .aion, and upon instituUnllitiJlllion 10 coUect same. the prevailing party IhalI be .....I.1ed 10 rasonable attorney's fees bad costs. IV. NisceUaneous A. Notices All notices. demands or requests prQVided for or permilled 10 be liw:n pUlSUllllllO Ibis Apeement . mUSl be in writing. All notices. demands IIId requesls 10 be IC:IIt 10 any party IhalI be deemed 10 have been poperIy liven or IetVed if penonaIly IetVed or deposiled in &he Uniled Slates mail, addressed 10 such party, posIale prqIaid, reJistaed or certified, with RtID1l receipt requesled, at &he addresses identified adjacent 10 the IianaJureS oldie panics represented. B. Goveminl Law/Venue This AgreemenI sha1l be lovemed by and c::onsauecI in aa:ordancc willi &he Laws or the State 01 California. Any action arisinl ander or reIaIin& 10 this Aareement shall be tIroulht only in the CedenI or IWe courts located in San Dielo CowIty, SIBle or California, and if applic:8b1e, the City Or Chula visIA, or as close IhereIo as possible. Venue lor Ibis. apemcaI. and pcrfOl'tNlllCt 1Iereunder, shall be &he City or OIuIa Vista. . C. Multiple SiplalOries U there are mulliple IliJll8lllries 10 this apement an behalf 01 Applicant. each rl such Ii&naIOries -"a1l be jointly and lewn11y liable Cor die pedormance or ~'. duties IIereiII let forth. D. SiJlllilOlY Authority The aianatory 10 Ibis 8&lecment hereby ~II and .... m nil that It is die duly desisnaled BBent Cor die Applicant and bas been duly authorized by die Applicant 10 execute this AJl'ectllent an behalf of die Applicant. Sipa10ry IhalI be penona1ly liable Cor Applicant's Duty 10 Pay and Applicant's Duty 10 Deposit in die event It bas not been authorized 10 execute Ibis Ajoecment by &he Applicant. ~D1I"""Jcwl~nl~l~nl . ""9 , ._d .' '..' ,. E. Hold Harmless Applkant shall defend. indemnify and bold b:lnnJess the City, lis eJected and appointed officers and employees. from and against all claims for dama&es. liability, cost and expense (InCluding withoutlimilDtion anomeys' tea) arising out of procasing Applicant's Jnitial Study, cacept only for those claims arising from the IDle negligence or IOIe willful conduct of the City, incumd by the City. ill oCrlCCB. agents, or emp10yccs ill defendin& against IIICh dIIims. wheIhcr the aame proceed 10 judgement or DOt. Funher, the AppIicanI. at lis own upense, 1ha11. apon wriucn request by the City, defend any IlEh suit or action brought against the City, lis officas, agents, or employees. Applic:ant's indemIIifc:aIio of the City Iha11 be limilcd by any pior or lUbsequent declaration by the Applicant. : F. Administrative Claims RequiraneaIs and J'roc:edures. No suit or arbIlralion shall be brought arising out of chis ....e...cN. epInst die City tiiJess a claim bas first been presented ill writing and flied with the City or 0wIa Vista and acted upon by the City of Chub Vista ill accordance with the procedures let forth ill Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municip:1l Code. as aame may from lime 10 lime be amended. the provisions or which are incorpom\ed by the reference as if fully.. forlh herein. and such poIic:ie:s and procedures used by the City ill the implementllion 9f same. Upon request by the City, the Applicanllha11 meet and confer in 1000 faith with the (.'(ty for the pdI'POSe of resoIvina any dispute over the IermS or this ApeemenL Now, therefore. the p:II1ies !lemo.l18vina ftad and understood the IermS and conditions or this agreement, do IIereby upre.s5 their consent 10 the IemIS hereof by leltinl their hand hereto 011 the dale let fonII adjacent thereIo. City City orChula VIStI 216 Founh Avenue :-~;p7t- Dated: 1/'/ /~'f . I I AppI~t (or authorized representative) Bruce Sloan, Project Mqr. Eastlake Development Company By: By: Dated: Pa.e 10 .: "- -. , , THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT !:I"~"""'t of cIisclosure of cenaiD OWDeI'Sbip interestS. payments. or CllDpaign contributions. 011 all mmen which will RqUire discreliouary actiOIl 011 !be pan of lIIe City Council. PIannin& CommissiOll, aDd all oilier official bodies. The following infOrmatiOIl must be cIisclosed: I. 2. 3. ... Us! !be -Des of all persons have a fi""",.;1I interest in Ihe coatract. i.e., CODIrICIOr. ~lnICIor. 'material supplier. . ~a~tlak~ DeveloDment Company U 811)' person idcIItified purllllllllO (1) above is a .....l"'lIIioD or pII1DeRhip, list !be I181III$ of all iDdividuaia ownin& more 1IwI10S of !be sbare: 1D!be eorpondoD or ownin& 811)' panaenhip interest in !be partnership. :T r.: ~n~Wp. 1 1 U any persoll identified pursuant 10 (1) above II DOII-profil OIJ",i7JI.ion or a trUSt, iist die I181III$ of 811)' person serving IS director of !be DOII-profit Ollanintion or IS trIIStCC or benefJC:ialy or trIIStCC of lIIe UUSt. N'n Have you had more IIwI $2SO worth of business U'IDSICIed willi 811)' -'- of &be City Itaff. Boards, Commissions, Commiuccs aDd Council within &be past cwdve months? No , 5. Please identify eICh and every persoll. iDcIudin& any 'lents, employees, coasul'on.. or iDdependenl COIItrICtOl'S who you have assigned to represent you before lIIe City In this mmer. ~nb Santos. Kent Aden. Bruce Sloan, Katy Wright 6. Have you BDdIor your officers or 'IeDtI, ID &be aare&1Ie. COIIIributed more IIwI 51,000 10 a Council _'- ID !be c:umnt or pr--'i~ rlec:tion period? Ya ( ] No DC) U yes, BIBle whidI Council _'-(s): . ...... ~ as: -_1DItiYidual. film. lID r-~Aip.jDIIII..-n. _ "~.a.J cIab.,........ . . '*1. I 1. -.' -........., ..~...tW&udOlQ'OIbot_.cIr1ud_.cIr1. . .I'Ity........OIbotpolili:al ...... ,...,OIbotpoap . L' "-..... u . 8aIt. . (NO'I1:: ~...... '_--.y) rfb1k Bruce sloan, proJect Manager Date: , ~BstlBke Development Cdmpany Prinl or type DIme of COIItrICIOr/lpplicanl - . " YS-S1/ Case No. 'pt:. -qio/-f, INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS ENGINEERING DIVISION L prainasze A. II: the project site within a flood plain'? fJ~. If so, state which FEMA Floodway F~uency Boundary. ~A . B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities'? $V~ -.e F'LoW 7tJ ~HM~..AJ.JtJ CrrY ~a..~~ ~"""V~V~~ c:Y~&A C. Are they adequate to serve the project'? /J{). If not, please explain briefly. 'R?DT'''''/,,- ~,F'I~ 'f">DA...JaJ~€. IMPIZt:AlE:uIlE:..r:fS Wlu.. ~ 1?P'.quIIlt:o WlJIU..J T.>~I AiA...Ae'...,.,- "''/1 JJ)C _ D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities'? 'TIr1 ~,."'... PI.{ ~-ArAJ"';v...l r.De'~ ~&.t:. ~A.lvL':JJ ~~K AND ~L.T"'" ~~6'" I . ' E. Are they adequate to serve the project'? NO. If not, please explain briefly. 1lF.r.IJ?I..JAt.. IMPi/IlZ>o/--.~e.f'n!:. ~y -- ~/-~Ai - IN -r'JfE. ~~ t!M...rvt:>>-J AIJD 'A,r I".~I!. ~^'.. AS "-':"'I!.I..I"JJI~ /"'Y /-f~' . n. ~1~1~A: ,I , Transponation AIJ NA~ -rP"ntJ! ~FIC. SI'U:>>' ~ ~ J;I.~ &~I!V~ SPA ~1R..wlu...6e ~/#D(&f0/. ,,,,~/1.Ii'l,~ /101 T'TJ;.FF(~ &M "4."''fb~ Rl&M A. What roads provide primary access to the project'? ~ ~ B. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)'? SfJII.:). c. What are the A verlge Daily TraffIc (A.D.T.) volumes on the.primary eccess roads before and after project completion'? Street Name Before Aftt:r Do any of these volumes rxcetd the City's Leve1-of.Sc:rvice (L.O.s.) -C" desipl ADT volume'? If yes, please specify. ,. ~=""".ICI2I'))CJof.ICI2UJ) p. 2 \ Ys -5'tf I . Case No. P;-CfL(-ftt If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly. . D. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project'? If not, please explain briefly. E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) lit intenections adjacent to or in the vicinity of the project site'? If so, identify: Lociltion Cumulative LO.S. F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under me Congestion Management Program'? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips). If yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TlA) will be ~uired. In this case the TlA will have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-signifICance. Yes No The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not ~uired. G. Is traffic mitigation ~uired to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of the proposed project'? Yes No If yes, please describe. H. Is the project co!'~istent with the aiteria established in die City's Transponation Phasing Plan, General Plan Traffic Element, and all odIer pertinent traffic ..."Ii..s'1 Please refaenc:e any other traffic impact studies far roadway aegments that may be impacted by the poposed project. L J. Is a traffIC study ~uired'? Is there any dedication required'? If so,please specify. Yes No wpc~m,,~.lmU)).,.IO>>.93) p. S . . , YS-9ll . Case No. :I'$ ..tfaf-{"f K. Is there any street widening ~uired'? If so, please specify. L. Are there any other street improvements required'? If so, please specify the aeneral nature of the DeCeSSary impovements. M. Will the project and related public improvements provide aatisfactory 1I'Iffic service for existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions'? (please provide a ~f explanation). m. ~ IV. A. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site'? vloJ. KJ.JoLJ.J . B. If yes, specify these conditions. ~A . C. Is a Soils Repon necessary'? YJf~ F-)(fS-riAlt:. SDI'~ 2~~ M()S-r-~ IJ&DI."T'!:D MJf)/t;;IZ. hAet~ ~ I/'J'-UJ~ i1+'E Hl5AS Land Form N../A . 'A2oR>~ "ft> ~ /WT"r'p TO THE EXlsrlN&. I ~~1? SPA . A. What is the average natural slope of the site'? B. What is the maximum natural slope of the site'? v. ~ Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be ~uired of the applicant'? 1.J#J~w...1 . AfJ A.tA &:'dl'>&A~ IT" ."., TuF ~.-\ J;1t!. .Nolse ~ VSIS WI'L B~ ~(~r> . VL Waste Generation How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be pncnted by the I'IOposcd project per day'? Solid 2 ~ ~a1J~ """# n4Y IWE.IL 'fU1! tEJt(~#J'-s ,A.PN-~ C:;PA Liquid~~~n~'(~6 t:lf:A. 7A4Y&~~~ I!bLJ.)tJv~ -ru~ ~IMt~,A~I!;b~. What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the aiIe'1 .~. AI~ ~~ u.J~ 11o.1~' 6!!~~AI.!I.r. tF.A.tJVn1J 111T&'i 1~1h#~ ~ AAl~ A /2'( ~ ~ ~oJ~ '#oJ e~1Le PAP..-oI (J-r ~ ~/u~ ~T'; lI.LfT"'tll.u.."'JAt.L. ~~ 1AIt..f JIj5. Y. e(!l~bffno. please explain) JJo. ~~ S~~~~ AM~~~H..rr:. 'T2'> ~ 7""".o:~1U1PIl &.",,,,Mo1 ~1Il WI" ~ I2€fU'~~. .... <4 ~-er ( CaseNo.~ vn. ~ationa] Pol1utant DischarlZe Elimination SYstem rNPDES) Stormwater Reauirements Will the applicant be required to file a Notice of Intent with the SWe Water Resources Control Board for coverage under an NPDES Stormwater Pcnnit'? YES. . If yes, specify which NPDES permit(s) II!1d explain why an NPDES pennit is Jequired. AIJ IJ.~ .1:'PfIAIT -r:n, ~u\AJ~1! ~(~.u."'~J:;'.; ~r..IA~ IAJrrH "_.LI~~~ ~t;.""'lIrr/~~. A ~~,..,- .< ~~'JI~~ R,;:r~r,~e I"'JV~ t:=JfI~ AJ~~ WiLl ~ T::It.r9n...tRICr:;?'7 A+lb 7Z.I:=/"...Mx.t::: -n.IF.. ~~ ~Attr:, I':1tI>UE...W- It;. 'l}JrItr DF A LAP,~n t!nAAAAnAJ a..& JJ 01= Dl;EV':1.1Du~ ~ ~'J: . Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project'? ~ Yes No Additional comments "'-oJJ/!: . vn. . Remarks Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impactS, mitigation measures, or other issues. J:14-e. A-I>P1_1t:...A..,r ~ Qo~1!C' ASSE'~..~~ '7)~,t:."-1=L/A#"--"l&. ~4. VI.uaI ,~ IAAe>UV~~IfJ'.a.J'T'C.. eih f q-fL . . I Date wpc:r.~022J3IJ<f.IIIIU,)(ao!.IIIIU3) p. 5 , . Case No. 15-'14.1'1 FIRE DEPARTMENT A. What is the distance to the nearest fire station'? .AD4 wha% is the Fire Department's estimated rc.action time' ~D st. t., c:~ fh\n. t"'t'-n~i Ot"'\ +i VV"\~ - : B. Will the F'ue Dep~ment be able to provide an ~uare kve1 of fire ...~..ctIO'I for the proposed facility without an inaease In equipment or peDOI1IIe1? --J./ e.5 C. Remarks AJ cD l' ~' l!o-iI1f\i/.{>f10 F' Marsha1 o(l{)olq~ DI1e - - - - - ,. __..~-- ~.__.- ....l!"I'II.lft.,.,.ft_~ 1II2..l..l:l.l...dl..tJJ:l:lll1} .... - . . - .. - Case No.~5-cH',q PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT A. Is project subject to Parks and Recreation Threshold ~Wrements7 '(j'CS'. If Dot, please explain. :B. c. D. How many acres of parkland are aecesSJ"Y to serve the proposed project? ~ ~ ~~;::;? oJ ~~ k~"oc. c:..."Z\~~,IIo.. Axe existin& Deighbarhood IIId community parks Dear die project 8deqUIU\ 10 lel'Ve the population incrtase resuhin& from this project7 Nei&hborhood ~ Community Parks tJ O. If not, are parkland dedications or other miti&ation proposed as pan of the project adequate to serve the population increase'? Neighbomood ,\,\~$' Community Parks \' ~ . To meet City requirements, v.:ill applicant be ~uired to: Provide land'? 'riZ'S ....'t Pay a fee'? ,I" . Remarks: E. F. . . - - ~.~,~ Parks and ReaelZiOl1 Director ar Reprerr-"ye ~.-=r."'t't- Date ,. .P.&a 1 , ' . Clse No. 15-'14,/'1 LANDSCAPE PLANNING A. Does the project affect native plant communities'? ~ If 10, please identify which communities. Winlhe project require native plantinl? (please dacribe)...\tl.Rt r:t.. ~ -hMe.. . .B. Please identify any imponant or hiJhly visible hiDsides CIII &II' adjacent 10 the project. ~ What landscapin~ conditions (if any) will be required for these hillsides? . C. Of the total area to be developed, how much, and which areas are e~ to be rq>lanted and ~uire supplemental waterin,,? (please describe). E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitiption for Ihe project' M - .' . ~ ~s~;.;rve DIIe Pall . \. ..< . - " ROUTING FORM DATE: Janua ry 18. 1994 I , ! I I ! ~ I '. rl-~'~ ~~. SUBJECT: .. ~.n urson, JluIlcUng~ Boudng! ~obn Lippitt, EngIneering (EIR only) Clitt SWanson, Engineering (EIR only) Bal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Bngineering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolt, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Beg Dec ~ EIR) carol Gove, Fire Department. . Harty schmidt, Parks , RecreatIon Crime Prevention, police Department (H.J. Diosdado) current Planning Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, ~ate Shurson sweetwater Union H.S. District, ~om Silva (IS' EIR) Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) LAFCO .(IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved) other Doug Reid Environmental sectIon 060 ) I I ) ) Application tor Initial Study (IS- 94-1~FA-~/DO Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days} (EIR-____/FB-----/DO Review ot a Dratt EIR (EIR- /FB- /DP Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC- ERR- Review ot Dratt Neg Dec (IS- /FA- IDO- rh. Proj.ct consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in: 1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the existing proposal density and 2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with an additional 97 dwelling units. d to .e any co...nts you bave Plea.e review the document and by 02-01-94 . ( CO/lllllents: ,. ;j c..~i:-f C2- .,.j,{~ - -4..~~ ./~ , ROUTING FORM DATE: January IB, 1994 fO: Ken Larson, Building , Housing John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only) Clitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Neg Dec , EIR) Carol Gove, Fire Department . Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado) ~rrent Planning' - -Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson ~ Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS , EIR) Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - It annexation is involved) Othez: FROM: Doug Reid Environmental Section SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (15- 94-1~FA-~/DO 060 ) Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO ) Review of . Dratt EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP) Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-_) Review of Draft Neg Dec (15- /FA- /DO- ) !l'he Project consists ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in: 1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the existing proposal density and 2, The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake GreenS development with an additional 97 dwelling units. Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 02-01-94 . it""f~ I.A~<' ~ ~ Do\M~&~' , O\~ ~ (.\;..~"'-~ ~ ~CL.( fp.../'~ -0 (12.0~ 4. "l1 cL.::J t>.~...o \ ~ov... eouants: - - - . " ROUTING FORM DATE: January 18, 1994 !O: ~en Larson, Building , Housing John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only) clitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolt, Asst city Attorney (Dratt Heg Dec , EIR) Carol Gove, Fire Department . Marty schmidt, Parks , Recreation Crime Prevention, police Department (M.J. Diosdado) current Planning Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning 1IotI ~'U1nit:t, cny""'uJ"__,,.n,l.it.~tJ )ob Leiter, Planning 1)ir.ctor~.-'---- Chula vista Elementary School District, ~ate Shurson ~ sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS' EIR) Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved) other FROM: Doug Reid Environmental Section SUBJECT: Application tor Initial study (IS- 94-1~FA-~/DO 060 ) Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (E1R-____/FB-----/DO ) Review ot a Dratt EIR (E1R-____/FB-----/DP) Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC-____ERR-----) Review ot Draft Neg Dee (15- /FA- /DO- ) !'he Project consists ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in: 1. The transfer of units within the existin9 boundaries of East Lake GreenS to refine densities with no net increase in the existing proposal density and 2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake GreenS development with an additional 97 dwelling units. Plea.e review the document and torward to me any comments you have by 02-01-94 . COlllll8nts: '~ ;d.y~~ , , '"' .' . ~ CHULA VISTA POUCE DEPARTMENT CRIME PREVENTION UNIT PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS .. - ,~ -. . -.,'", ~. ..' . ''':';-, DATE: i-...~ ~.l /QC,4 TO: ~.JC^' R..e.l.J Wuz,e.-. PJh,n n V-......... VIA: ~~.7~'-',.~v. y,v. FROM: 'YI1~~ ~ f SC!..f'..s PROJECT: :J.':;), '14-1'1 O~A. <[,o..JLJ~6J~~~ ?b~ _ The Critne Prevention lInit does not have any comments regarding this project at this time. _ Information on the project, or within the plans. does not provide enough detail to pennit crime prevention analysis. .25i- Please forward the following information to the Crime PreventiOl1 Unit when available. ~ Elevations Floor Plans L Landscape and Ughting Plans ....1:2.. Site Development Plans Comments: aJ \..fA_L urr .N1.ui;t 7r~L J A tuJr; /UJ f!.n77m,)~i;f V . rff..p-:1Ld WJ '/I...L G~ .p~-" tJ,,., oP-IHI-It,,/71Nr!:)la V-. ~ ()/i~ 6.. /n-i.J .".1.. '-6~- u<J~ Yzf.4-- dtl7~ ~_ ':br-fAk" ' " c:c: Brookover. SCA --~- MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: Fcbnuuy I, 1994 FROM: Doug Reid Environmental Review Coordinator Duane E. Ba2:zc~ Principal Planner SUBJECT: Initial Study for EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment (IS-94-19) The Advance Planning Division appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed project identified above. From an environmental analysis standpoint it appears that the EastLake Greens ElR and Addendum sufficiently addressed the proposed density transfers within EastLake Greens. The proposed transfer of units are occurring under the umbrella of the originally-approved EastLake Greens SPA and Tentative Map (2,774 units), therefore, unless there are significant shifts in unit locations it would appear that the original ElR adequately addresses the transfers. It should not be forgotten, however, that as a condition of approval of a recent GP amendment to Parcel 26 of the Greens (GPA-93-04), the Qty Council re-enacted the affordable housing requirement for the Greens (deferred with the Tentative Map approval) and directed staff to work with a task force to develop recommendations by July of this year on how to handle the low and moderate income housing within this project. This direction from Council included the consideration of any density transfers necessary to achieve the housing requirement. It docs not appear that the proposed density transfers are significant enough to impact the task force efforts, but nevertheless, these efforts should be considered prior to approving any SPA amendment. The 97 units to be annexed and added to the Greens have only been analyzed at a General Plan level (within the Otay Ranch Program EIR) and not at the detail necessary with a GDP and/or SPA. This needs to be taken into consideration when aDalyzins potential environmental impacts. Additionally, project-level analysis needs to be coordiDated with the Community planning Division of the planning Department (Otay Ranch SPA Team) on the issue of land use and design interface with East Orange Avenue and efforts on the adjacent Otay Ranch. cc: K.en Lee Steve Griffin Amy Wolfe ~) . . ., MEMORANDUM Pebruary 1, 1994 Pile # YS-591 SUBJECT : Doug Reid. Environmental Coordinator Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director~~ City Engineer . ~ Harold Rosenberg. City Traffic Enginee~ Eastlake Greens General Development and Sectional Area Plans Amendment TO: VIA: FROM: In response to your concern regarding our transportation comment in the subject initial study application, the following paragraph should be added to Section VII of the application. Previous traffic studies have shown that ~e circulation system plan prior to the construction of SR125 does not have sufficient capacity to absorb additional trips beyond those trips accounted for in the approved maps including the approved Eastlake Greens. Thus the Eastlake Greens proposed expanded development project will have to be limited to the number of trips identified in the approved project EIR traffic study. However, the applicant may wish to perform a supplemental traffic study to examine possibilities of expanding the City's circulation system (e.i. extension of E. Orange Avenue between I-80S and Eastlake Greens) to provide the needed capacity. A reference to the city's interim SR-125 financial study (HNTB study) and improvement scheduling are a critical element of the study. ZAO: rb cc: Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer 11'. ~\__\'rUP1'1C\....-....,) ,. MEMORANDUM Febroary 21, 1994 File # YS-551 FROM: SUBJECT: Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator . Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Directorl. V City Engineer ~ Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engined / . . "~. '''~.:l Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment Traffic Study (IS-93~ ~ TO: VIA: I have reviewed the attached traffic impact report by Urban SystemS dated February 18, 1994 and fwd it to be acceptable. The new trips from the added 97 units to the Eastlake Greens approved units of 2774 have no significant impact on the City's circulation system. ZAO:dv Attachment .~\~.ZAO ,. ~ '- - ,- , , URBAN SYSTEMS .lWSOCIATES, INC. "--.~~'''' :ETWG.flRt:lJl!Cra- -,c':f::,:::: CoM$LC. TAN'TS 70 INDUST'AY AND ~ . . ,i y ~::.- G ~ '_; L:'" '<t' ~;; ~ :. :"'~r:.t~~~:~ ".:; :.f:;~ 634 fEB 22 W. 9: 4S February 18, 1994 Mr. Hal Rosenberg City TraffIC Engineer CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vasta. CA 92010 Dear Hal: Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Eastlake Development to evaluate possible Impacts from the development of additional dwelling units In the Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment. 1he Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment proposes an Increase of 97 dwelling units from 2,774 DU to 2.871 DU. eneration The development of 97 additional dwelling units will result In the following peak hour and dally vip generation. NA PEAK I'M PEAK USE IN'IENSITY GENERATION N:1T MTE ~ NA 1N:0I11' 1N:0I11' fIN.. fIN 1N:0I11' IN:OI11' 8PUT 8PUT SFDU I7DU 1O/DU 170 '" 78 2:8 18:82 1~ 111 7:3 18:28 fv, can be observed, the 97 additional units will result In 97 PM peak hour trips. Of the 97 PM peak hour trips, 68 are Inbound and 29 outbound to the project. The NIl peak would have 78 additional peak hour trips with 16 Inbound and 62 outbound during 1118 peak. previous TraffIC Studv AssumDtions A traffic ftIdy for KaIser Hospital (Eastlake I SPA Amendment by JHK Assocla1es) D! comDlet,c! on ADrll 20, JS. 1he KaIser Hospital traffic study represents the most recent anaJysls of interim conditions for eastem Chula VIsta (east of 1-805). The analysis for interim conditions assumed the 'approved proJects' level of development for It's interim analysis. The 'approved proJect' level of development was based on the Final Eastern Chula VIsta . Transportation Phasing Plan Update prepared by Wildan Associates (1191). ,. ~7 .,- .. . ~- - . ... .' ~- - - ~ - Mr. Hal Rosenberg February 18, 1994 Urban Systems AssocIates, Inc. In the final report for KaIser Hospital dated AprD 20, 1992, (page 41), the approved project development scenario will result In approximately 193,230 additional dally trips In Eastem Chula Vista. The analysis included trips generated by 2,774 units In the Eastlake Greens project. Using the .approved projects" condition as the bpe, Impacts from the KaIser Hospital were evaluated. Attachment 1 shows the NIoIPM peak hour i'ltersectlon level of service from the KaIser HospItal traffic analysis. ~ shown i'I Attachment 1, all intersections are forecasted to operate at a level of service .D" or better. KaIser Hospital Impacts to the i'ltersection of OIay Lakes at Eastlake Parkway (the cr\tiCaIlntersection for the KaIser Project) for the NIoIPM peak results i'I a level of service "C" to .D". Intersection delay was 5.2 seconds for the NIo peak and 5.4 seconds In the PM peak at this location. The Increased delay at this location was due to more than 14,000 dally trips from the KaIser project being added to the base conditions. The KaIser analysis concludes that the Intersection delay at OIay LakesRoacl and Eastlake Parkway Is 25.8 seconds In the NIo peak and 29.8 In the PM peak which translates to a level of service D. It should be noted that the intersection delay at OIay Lakes Road and Eastlake Parkway could be increased as much as 10 seconds and stili remain at a level of service "D". I)PA Amendment ImDacts In order to determine possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment, project traffic was added to the intersection analysis discussed above. "'I other assumDtions for the computer intersection analysis remained the same. As shown on Attachment 2, the resulting level of service Including project traffic remained "D" for both the NIo and PM peak. A comparison of Attachment 1 and 2 shows that with project traffic the i'ltersection delay Increased only 1.5 seconds In the NIo peak and 2.1 seconds In the PM peak. This cIearty indicates that the Spa Amendment for interim (worst case) conditions Is not Ukely to create Impacts which would require mitigation or change the level of service at Eastlake Parkway and OIay Lakes Road. In addition, possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment were analyzed for the i'ltersection of Eastlake Parkway and Fenton Street. .Base conditions for the i'ltersection analysis were obtained from the ScrIpps Clinic TraffIC analysis dated March 30,1993. For the base conditions, signal timing was optimized which resulting In a level of service .D" for the P,M. peak or an intersection delay of 36.7 seconds (see Attachment 3). Project trafllc was then added to the base conditions. All other assumptions for the computer i'ltersection analysis remained the same. M shown on Attachment 3, the resulting level of . service Including project traffic remained .Do, Intersection delay changed only 0,4 seconds to 37.1. This clearly shows that the SPA amendment for interim conditions Is not Ukely to create Impacts which would require mitigation. M. build out or with an interim 125 or with an Orange Avenue connection, Spa Amendment \mpacts would be even smaller because there would be multiple access routes. waamtl7 101_ . . - - Mr. Hal Rosenberg February 18, 1994 Urban Systems AssocIates, Inc~ BaSed on the Information discUssed above, Impacts from the development of 97 additional units appear to have minimal Impacts on the circulation system. We therefor suggest that no further traffic analysis Is necessary. Please call us If you have any questions regarding the analysis discUssed above. , APSrms:vks Attachments cc: Bruce Sloan Cliff Swanson Doug Reid I ,. wacNTM7 .,. r C/) Ci5 >- -I < Z < a: ::> o :I: ~..J <<: WI- ~- z3; -Qo ~I-:I: ~oo: ~ww GCf)Cf) <0:_ ~w<: ~....U' <z" -0: -0 ~LL. ..... I 0: C/) W a: ~ - .~. , . . - - . - '- ~ '- h\ . l i~ AAUAUUAAAUU UUUAaADuaa oA A ACaAAA !'Z .! . ~ ~~~. .....,..:."......."1 .,..:1"...,,,..... m., !!........::\ II II:~\ S;;o;;:R_RIU.I:RR ~R,,=~";:;R~~ Will III~=R;:;.. i! !)! AAUAUUAAAUU UUUAaAUUaa oU . oCaAAU 0" to") -:; i=!: "''''I...,...,~..,~.,... ~...-'!.~.,"':....,-.: ~ Wj~~~ ~& =i1 S;;o;;o;RSRIII;o;.R= _:AR=IIIR=== oa 0 O~=R;:;a II!~ S..- .2'" i t o!j ~ f~ a~ !i ~~ !t IE t Ii i! _ O. fC ... ~I ~ · i!~ e If~ ~ fi~ ~ II II . I J I I !!!~!!!IIJ!I'I!! I~t!,j I 1- rIft I !!!i!~~ii!!~ii~~lli]!jC! 1~IJ!~!l~~] .!1~!.!!!!!6.!.! A!I! II!! l!jl.!1 I !n!!!! t 11111 sA!!!!!!! !I I !!'II iilii!!!!!!! !}}I}}}}ll It I Iliii ~"~.~.~_.R=~ ~:~~c_~g~~ ~~ ~ .~~.M . , .,. I .. .. .. ~ ~ % 1'1 tU ..B _1- ii !it I' d t1 1~~~ 11 laU I il t!U t 4.- lit! ! It n.r! ;: II l~tl t d lul.i 1 u4.1i i IU U~.I I I {,;'15 j'l' ~ ~ !8] ~ i I ~ I J I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~I I] tit t- "J -1- ! 13 .uuuu...uaA uuu...uuau. oA A AC.UUU it lit '.!il m"mm ""'i.m lID, !',m tl i}t I I~I"OOOO"""O"" 000""00"0" .0 . ""000 ! (t liP 'b) nmmm ml'I'm .1 . ",iI! · tI II ,1 ~ I I ) It. I II .. ~ I WIIIII'II! fllIl.1111 ( II (III i liJ' I ~ .. I nhlnliJIluUhldilJlhlJJI!!1 ! U.lh t I ~ , I 1111111 j td JI~1 t I, ~ t u!n!UUU !}!UnUn III II IIU] ~ 16] hIl ; ! ~ ~~!~!~~~~~~~ ~;:;~;;;~~;~ R ~~!!! j". Jill i . . ., .. ,:. 0: o u. en Ci5 >- ...J < z.... <0 zw Q3 .....0: N@Q. ....ene za:w ~wen :r;....o ~~Q. 1:....0 <"'0: C\lQ. ...... 'w a:::I: en..... w a:: Q. - ~ - [t w ..... z - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Ii ; :.. 0 :! M I : t .. ti HI Ci . - .. . . .. WJ : i" a I m.. ::! ~ . . ~ ... .. . 1rI..!!SWI ~. I QoC := :...6J::." toe . 1ICr:1I:i I ,.. ~ : !;5g::;U: III:: : : : : : : ..~. & . . . . . 10 . 0 . . . . . .104 . . . . . ..... tW . . . . ~...:w::t: :&1 .,;:a:~~~~! =~:~~~~~ : ...UI....~CCl... I .. .. .. I I i~ I 000000 I : '~T 00 \1:::::::= i I: 1::1: DO !.. t ............ ~~~.. i B li~"""":~ s \ I ."":":":": III: N , .~~~~~~, ~~~~~~II~ft 00 ~ 1......................1 ~. 2i:tc1lCM .... ir: .. .. ": I,' ~~..I!i I, !~........It.. .. ~~II s= ~ ~ ~ ~ f" c:~~~~c: I I i"~" · '~~~~~~I!il ::::\ ~1!i1:2~1!i1:2 ~1~s..u......u....U..\I~ ~..~... ft: :::: I ~a It. - I It ....1 II I ii.. II 4! 000000 I 00001 ....~~c:~":~~~~~~ ! . . . . . . I .."'........................... ! INNNNNN' oliN.................... .................. 11ft." 00 G I 1 EeDoClo II:JE 00 ; - , ID It -: ~~~~..I. ." ... . 'foC o........ft..........I~ ..____~__t !Ioooo'.~ 00 uo..".,....~O..~~1 I I I Ie" MM .....P'Oft........ft".........'" I I=~~O I t E =.. "00000000000. ......: I a~.... I I=- Ie... '" 00 .~~~~.~~.~~I~ I~..O tMM" ... u.~.~~~.~".~IC ~ "". 0000 I =-1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~I ~ _"" ~_cccc oooOOOCOOO~1 1:- . . . . I 1 -........ o.....~~o M 00 I . ~."." M 0000 EM M :~II & I,! 0_0000 .: ;: 1::;:0 ;:"0000 1 !.a....a....a...a... i ~ ~... ~~tf~~l:fe~i IB ~~u u:: Ii I II..: I I II I I.. . OOOOOCI 111 00 I : =~~=:~:! e 00 !u I ~ ~~~u I B It........:~ S .. .... I: ~~ . 1 ...... . 0000001 i'.~~D'O' . . . . . . . I ......... ... : 1::==::= 1 ";"''''.. ~iMM. :: e~ : .: I ~ .1 ~~..I!i Ii !~........ t'i'.. .. :~ s~ .. ~.. ~ : I'... 000000 I .. I · :.!~ Eli '~~~~~;;!; ::::11 :',':...;;I!!........... · ~ I e.o. ~ I~..~N...~... 1 I Ii ~! .~~~~~~I I'.... jl . :: i~;;;;;;;;;;. I . _ Ii I ... ."............~..... " i .:i' a ________ BI.... -'" __ _.0. u..o"'~....... IE J. -... M" _.."''''...........0.. I I.. a............ : I · ;!5. tI~.... ~ . ... a~ .. ... ... I: fB:! ...... .......... u.~.=~:::~=: I ~ i~li~;~ I ~~~ ~~~~~~II I :. ~~~~~~~~~~~~ I~: : : : : :: 1.;::::0 iN !II i~ \ ~ . =1:1:;::: ........ 1_1111. ~ ~ & 0 -.. ~..'. . . . i- . . . .\ I~...~...~I!~..., ti ~I"~ 1:~JJi IEE:o -.... , !lnnnfl! I :5 I! = : ..U2\i:B ~nl IUI: I I .. I I I I I :: '0. , ., I:;:" ......1... , '. ~ ~ ~ o:s I G ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ct;) ~ ~ i .''':'. ~ ~ ~ \:) r I- o W ""') o ex: 0.. o w en o 0..1- Ow c:w 0.. a: wI- :Len I-z c:0 01- u.ffi rJ)u. (') Ci5 I- ~>- < ffi...J> ~< < 5Z> <<> ~Z~ <0 a: -< 1-0.. OW W~ ~< W-l 1-1- zen -< -w 10 N .... I W a: D.. - ( :i - a: w !Z - .0' II I I... .. .1 ~D . . 0 I II ' . O~ I. .O..O~, 0 1_0 . ' '';';';" I ~ --.. '1- ~~ I :I \~ : Iii::::--"" I. ."........ .. i II ..~~~I! i ~~~~:::: II~ ......;~ 'I j.~ ~ ~ ~ 15.. : .O~~~~, ~~~~"":~~ _ . ! 1=';';"::::::1 50 lit oS . : i .1 ...... ~ 'I !~~~..~ II!M .. ~..; I ."0 ~ : ! ..~~~ ~ IE lIuu.ou.. ., .., ..:s _ . I ... II .::...., I<t !, u . 4! I I'I.I;~~::: III!. I !1~=e~~ II~! i """~':~":, ~ : ~ .,.. I "1.5~~.~~.~::~.; !;, ''! m"l . '.""'" I_ ! :\ .......... 0011 ..U!~. ~~11i5 1~ . !' ..0.,., I., I ""......, =:.i. .1 I,;~~~::::! C~...ol~f , u:===~;~~~~I. ii." , i I II .0: _""~, '';0000:.. iii: I.. .::" ...... ':..: "';';0.. 1'= i:.. ~! ..~... __I eooooo: ,;, _ I ...WI":I& ti ::.~ ::.,_............ I IE" I,. .....:....Z.., .. 001 u"==:"~~':'o'l ... .",,::0 I .,.....: .... ", _~,. '';000. .. I ",. .... . g... 1.. "Ie ""I ..... I !. .. i . I 0' 'i , " .': ".., 0: 000' 00' . II! . .. "',".... I ...."1 ... . . '" II i h!;~;! &I """ ! .:'""""! t...... ~. '\ :~~.~~.~..~ III!I 5 : tih::~~: 5=:::::" I.. og:g: :s .. : ": , , , . , . e . - "_0. , . .." ", I li''':::::1 i !5:'oooo: "J;l<t!;J;."f.3:, . I I ... ... :0..:... 1-000 . Ii 1 - ;;~ I 0 . .....:..:1 .. " I . a~. ii:a~:i : :~! 0::;" I II::: I 0 Ii: B :;";";11 f'!s""l I : : ~S5i~B I ~..& ~.... I ~ CI) ~ .. . .0' . 001 ~o ..I , , ., .. ~ ! ! D . , O. .. I.' oOO~~~i . ,~J: : i =';';~::::::I ~ "ft. "I: .... j i ::.., i i.....!li .... , : I 0001 ':'':~::::IB':' ......... ~ : ~~~,;,;';I 5." f . ' ""..., . .. : : i !~....~.. !.. .. :. ;- i ..~~~I! IE ! .!uu...V~..". . . I ..::: ~G u t : ~~~~::~ U"lIu, I t = i: I=:::~-- \'0 I SII "I .. II".-:~':~~~~~i I 8 I:;; I '~~====_ft." _ . ....~. i -,;.. 0 I .. . ..~~~~ I '1 ~,; It M....= i ~: . I .. ...." D....oo:lf !i ".::::":::::.. . ' ""...,'. .. '''''''''''. .~ 5 ~ ......~.. "';';0.0 _ Ii: I I -_._~-~-~-- II.... at - ..~".::;I I ~ ul:::::~-:~-: : I I I:i::. i~.............. ~~ ;-_~,;,;,;,;o.o. ,- ., I . . ~ .... 0 IIII .. 0 i ~ii tlEi: CE.;.;.;~ i:'J.. .... .o..II~1I tit I i ~~~~'1 II =:=;:0 IE~~~~ I snullul!! r~ I II Ii: Bti~ ~: : : n:::o I I .., I ... ...:1:' ... h: ~t: 'a. UIII ili hii!11 Uti .. .. " ~ j,: ~ .. ~ ,; " . . " " . ." S ~ ~ ~ CI) ~ ~ 1 ~! ~ -. . MEMORANDUM February 23, 1994 File Number YS 591 FROM: Doug Reid, Environmental Review coor~~~;.tor Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer ~I TO: SUBJECT : Initial Study 94-019, EastLake Greens GDP & SPA Amendment This is to clarify our comments (on sewers and drainage) dated February 1, 1994 concerning the information provided in the application for the subject Initial Study. OUr comments on drainage (Section I, A through E) noted that project specific improvements would be required as development occurs and further, that regional improvements in Salt Creek and Poggi Canyon may be required as development occurs. This comment was meant to convey that development of the overall General Development Plan area would probably require construction of regional level drainage improvements. Any additional development which may occur as a result of this amendment may require greater capacity in those facilities, but we believe that the added capacity would be insignificant. OUr comments on Section VI, Waste Generation, noted that some segments of the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer will be over capacity at, or prior to, General Plan buildout conditions. This comment addressed the fact that the EXISTING Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer lacks capacity to serve the buildout development. A Development Impact Fee (DIF) is presently in place for gravity basin development, and a Telegraph Canyon Pumped Basin DIF will be in place very shortly, as will a Salt Creek Basin DIF. The parallel and upgraded facilities provided for through the collection of these fees will be adequate for the provision of sewer service to all of the affected development areas for ,as long as necessary. The additional development which may result from t~e proposed amendment may have a non-significant impact on one segment of the sewer line. That impact would be that an upgrade required by the overall development would increase by a minor degree with the added development. No increase in the DIF would occur. ,. m.t): Y..ltl .:\H0K8\8MOIHaaR\la,t-Ol' EXHIBIT A Description of Work Assessment District 94-1 The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following: 1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and 1,,,,t!V"'ping within the following rights-of-way: a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entranee (2,400 L.F., phase 1). b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., phase 2). c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entranee to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). 2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities, telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable state and federal statutes within the following rights- of-way: a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entranee (2,400 L.F., Phase 1). b. South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F., Phase 2). c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6.entranee to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3). 3. DlF funded street improvements consisting of grading, storm drain, base, paving, curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, streetlighting, landscaping and street monumentation within the following rights- of-way: .. Hunte Parkway _ from Clubhouse Drive to South Gt'eensview Drive (2,300 L.F., Phase 2). 4. DIP funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and atorm drain improvements within the following rights-of-way: ' L Hunte Parkway _ from South QreeDSview to Orange Avenue (1,270 LF., Phase 2). b. Orange Avenue _ from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E eavment <3,500 L.F., Phase 2). ,. , WPC .:1t \l615.M .., .- '-> -'" ~. .~ ~t' ~o r I i:II'!< Ru.uJ ruCK ENGli'\'EERlNG COMPANY S.111 Di~.~o c.dlrurni;l 9~IIO.~~9t1 \\'I;h" !?C"IJ:'1(\,. V;~'.'~I"1 ttol~1291.0iOi F.-\X. u'191291~1('I~ ..J r-~a~. " .. . -- _. .. 13'3,; February 7, 1994 Mr. Clifford Swanson City of ChuJa Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. California 91912 RE: EASTLAKE GREENS. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPA AMENDMENT (J-12347) Dear Mr. Swanson: This is to confirm that the stonn drainage s)'stem designed for EastLake Greens has adequate capacity to accommodate the run.off generated by additional areas being incorporated into EastLake Greens SPA boundal)'. as shown on the attached exhibit. In addition. areas being added do not adverse I)' impact the drainage s)'stem previously planned and approved as pan of Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 88-03. Should you have any questions. please caJl me. Sincerely, _ RICK ENGIN~';'.q>MPANY p-C~ Dennis C. Bowlin~i R.C.E. Director, Water Resources Division DCB:k\.OOI Enclosure cc: Mr. Doug Reed. City of Chula Vista . Mr. Bruce Sloan. EastLake Development Company Mr. Houshmand Aftahi, Rick Engineering Company . . r.-. +~..:.;\ . ~ February 9,1994 Mr. Cliff Swanson City Engineer em' OF CHUl.A VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: EastLake Greens Development Plan and Spa Amendment 15.94-19 Dear Cliff: As a part of the review of the referenced initial study the engineering department noted possible adverse impacts to the sewer system serving the Eastwe Greens Project. As a response to this concern, I have quantified the impact of the Plan Amendment in each of the sewer basins within the Eastwe Greens Project. This review (an ached) has concluded that the impacts of the additional development within each of the basins is minimal when compared to previous land use and system analysis performed by the city. If you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to call me. , Sincerely, EAS'1'UJ<E DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Bruce Sloan Senior Project Manager c:c: Doug Reid . Environmental Review Coordinator ,. ,- J1A ~ ~ EASTlAKE ~LO!'MEN1 COMPANY 900 LOn8"'- Sui'. 100 ChuIO \MIO, CA 9191. (619) .21.Q127 FAA (619) 421-1&30 .. - . ~ -~ SALT CREEK BASIN GRAVITY SEWER ANALYSIS Sewer service to the Salt Creek Basin within the EastLake Greens Project in currently provided by the Ctay Lakes Road Lift Station (located at Ctay Lakes Road and Salt Creek) and the Telegraph Canyon Tnmk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment affects the following parcels within the Salt Creek Basin: Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/ Decrease- R-3(south) 42 51 9 R-10 167 246 79 R-11 92 87 <5> R-22 146 141 <5> R-23 205 214 9 R-27 40 44 4 Net Change In Units 91 The flow generated by the additional 91 dwelling units (based on 250 GPD per DU) is 15.8 GPM. This amount represents an increase of 1.4% over the 1100 GPM flow rate assumed to be generated by the EastLake Project within the Salt Creek Basin (see Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment Incorporating Pumped Flows, Figure 8, Page 11). The operation of the Ctay Lakes Road Lift Station and Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should not be significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in the flow rate. ,. . . , .' TELC:GRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN IMPROVEMENT AND FINACIAL PLAN The proposed Genera] Development Plan and Spa Plan Amendment will affect 4 par<:e1s (R-7. R-ll, R-14. and R.24) that are located within the boundary of the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer Basin. At the time the Basin Improvement and Financing Plan was developed EastLake Development Company and the City assumed the unit counts proposed in the Amendment. Therefore, no modification to the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan is required. POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN Sewer service to the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin within the EastLake Greens Project is currently provided by the EastLake Parkway Pump Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment affects the following parcels within the Poggi Canyon Basin: Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/ Decrease- R-3(nonh) 42 S1 9 R-14 84 86 2 R-15 88 65 <13> R-20 164 143 <21> R.25 74 78 4 R.28 27 60 33 Net Change In Units 14 The Average flow to the EastLake Parkway Pump Station (as outlined in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment Incorporating pumped Flows) is 254 GPM. At a rate of 250 gallons per day per unit the net increase in units generates an additional 2.4 GPM. The operation of the EastLake Parkway Lift Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should not be significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in flow rate. . , ,. - - .. ...' ~AR- ~-94 WED 16-17 CHU . _, ' LA VISTA SC~.OOL. DI$T. P."':;: )ARD Of EDUCATION SEPH D.~INCS.Ph.D. \.ARRV CUNNINGHAM SHARON GILES PATRCK A..lUCO GREG I\. SANDOVAl. SUPEIUKfENDENT LilIA S. GJl. Ph.D. CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J'. STREET. CHCL>\ \"ISTA. CALIFOR.."\IA \llH10 . 619425.9GOO . ----.--- .- --.-.--. ~-- EACH CHlI.D IS A." ISD1\'IIJt:AJ. OF GREAT WOHTlI March 9.1994 Mr. Doug Reid Environmental Review Dept. City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. CA 91910 RE: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment Dear Mr Reid The proposed GDP/SPA Arne~.dmen!. WI\! increase the total dwelling unit count within EastLake Greens by 9~' lln!!S from L774 to 2871 At the Dlstnct-wide average student generation rate of 03 students/unit. t'lis equates to 861 students. It is anticipated that all ct\ildre.... fiorn EastLake Greens. including those from the additional 97 units wili aHe:'):! SchoQ; No S5 which will be constructed In the EastLake Greens Community and has a proposed opening date of July. 1995. This school is planned to cpen on a single-track year-round schedule and eventually convert to a multi-track year-round schedule when required to accommodate enrollment. All elementary school facilities within the EastLake Community will be financed by participation in Community Fa:.lhties Dlstnct No 1. which fully mitigates all project impacts on schools. If you have any questions. pleEse contact me Sincerely, ~~ ~\.V-'~~l"" Kate Shurson Director, Planning & Facilities ,. KSdp co: Katy Wright - ._...~ ~....-..~. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (PCS-95-02) ATTACHMENT #6 . " I 'I ~. l ~ . ! ;"! I! . !:1 I ! sll ~ n ~ i II IOLY ! 'II i. Ii I' i n I ~" =1 E!isl: I II 'II ~ I: I ill I' ;iUhU nl.l.iil .... II .. .. of .. .. .. It :I! .. 'II' II It I! If .. II.... II .. CD ('II z 0 1&1 I 1&1 It) a: ~ CI . % 0 A. to- Z C ::I :s~.... (,) 1&1 1&1 C > :.i: a:: _ c .... ~ .... CCDC .... c .... Z 1&1 t1) 1&1 to- _ .... c > ~ C ~ !: ;:) z % ::I (,) - ~- .'" ~. - .;'r. i "... _ iiIII . 1j 11 i ~ ' ~Ii ........ I nn; ~!.~lt~~mh~I'I:1 "Ii' I III II I I1II i ;1 "III! . I II I I I; . !IIII] II Iii I I'u, ~lllii II I,II!~IIIIIIIIIIIII ir Ii , . II . i · a ( Wf . 91; i ~i ~ i= I I iJ --.-1: I I . I~! j I I ! Ij!. i ~ <<>0 , , "'- "''''", ill "(fl.- ~o..!.~ ?;t.:t.~, o ()...~..... Uy _ ~~~ ''0 6~~~.-l ",y", ""'''',,- ~'d1tJ1 --0<- ~7") ~A..... v.\~<:l "'''' U I . Z . t I / , '-' , V'&> //~ '<y -/ 'C,> &>/, ^ VC)., O/, VV";-J..r f/ ~ C' 'Yf.~ /~ '''v './ -// '/) O&> ~ ...(0, / ,. J .. , V":..!/ 'f.~/j , &>f~ f' , -yv .. ';'''' "'(/) ~~1f) 0",_ Z",_ <P) ...-,- ~" "'II. ' "'-0 :J:;Z <", "'ZIL "'0< -->; >11. <>; -,'< ,,'" "," " n. . . : I ! i II i i :zii~ I i! .,:;: ~ c , c -I! . ~c c z s: ~ c. .= / -/ '0, / ~ GOLF COURSE TRAIL CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ATTACHMENT #7 ." '" ,.... 2 ~ ,.... : ~"", 0 ,. ~ 8 ~ I _ J: '7. ":' "tt ~5g~~cn i~~~1 tHH i ,=,,:; j ~ w I- w 0: UZ Z;': 0<( U-I ::I:Z 1-- -(I) ;':-1 -I W<( U;,: <( 0:1- 0:<( ww 1-(1) Z > ;,: 0: <( I- -I Z W I- <( c:J Z > <( a. ::I: I- - ;,: ::E 0: w m ~ C It) <( W U ::I: (I) U C 0: Z Z <( w -I l ~ -I <( ;,: W C en U -I m ::J a. .. '" - CD ~ - ~ ~ I- w w 0: I- (I) U - -I m ::J a. ~ I- Z - o a.. 3: w - > w en a: :::> o o LL ..J o " ,. ~: , - , , i I (/) Z WZ Wo 0:- "l- t) wW ~en <( ,^ 9 ..J \1# ;.. f- (/) ." en 0 ~ <(a:~ WU~ w ~ -........ :J . o ; ~~;,." -I ' ' o c:J o I- ;,: w - > I .; ~ -; ~ j ~ w t) z w u. 3: w > ) ( '-., U. ...I o eJ ..... r~v w t) r w. t) z w o en w a: !!!\ , ~l--c:- eJ W ::J > o 0 a: t) 3: 0 ..... z 3: ::J <( 0 ...I W a: ...I a: eJ <( <( ..... 3: z g:<( 3:3:a:w o <( J:a: ...I ...I en <( c.. a: I- /reJ ~ z <( :> 3: >- <I: W a: c.. I- z W 00...1 0 a: :ien...l W t) 0<(<( J: z en::;:3: ~ 8 z _ W '<t W t) z W o en W a: \ ~ ~ '\ W ;;;: U. c.. , ~ ~ '\ a: c: ----] c.. z : I w I I I ----------------------------- \ , \ \ \ \ I ~. , ~ '~ ... o w '" '" '" o a: o ~s Oc -~ ~~ I- ,Z - o Do 3: w - > w en CC :::::> o u LL ..J o (!) en z> we w:::::> ccl- "en wI- ~a.. <( w~ ..Ju~ I- z.' CI) o~ <( U<! W ~ DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ATTACHMENT #8 TIm c:nY OF CH1.JU,. VISTA DL.c:a.os:URB STA'JEMENT 1'0\1 are req\llr~ 10 l1Je a Su ItlDeDI of D~IOiun: of cr:ru!n """"tDhJp or flnaDcal U>"'=", parme..,.. Dr campllpl X>Mrlbu!iOn1, OD aU "'J!ltr\ ,.,hieb ...111 re<j\llre du.crellonar)' aC!IOD OD lbe pan of tbe (1)' Co\lDdJ. Plaru>l1\& CommlulDll, IDd ,11 otllo.r cmdal bodies. "Tht roUO'Ning WOnDllJOD D"al be d..c10.0d: ,. Un th. DarnOJ; of aU PG"on. bi\iof . uuci.1 iDlerCltlD tbe proper.)' wbieb utbe .ub).... or lbe appUa!lon or tbe COlltI'BCl. e.g., OWDer. IppUCODl, WMr=cr, 'Uba:>DtTJc.lDr, material .uppller. EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMP~~ C Ihll)' ~I'5CIl. itlelltifie:d pUrI\lie! to (I) above ill corporatJon or I'lnnenltJp, \1sttbe Il&II'ICS of aU LDdMdlllls OWZIm. mor.lhaD 1090 of lb. d,.res iD lbe corpor'ltIOD or ~i III)' p&nDcnlUp u:tt:cstu> tbe pan:>e'~lUp. BOSWELL PROPERTIES, INCORPORATED TULAGO COMPANY '. If ar:y ptMn" ie!er.!ified pUrsuit! to (J) above a nOD-profit orpnJz.atlo%l Dr a truSt, \1sllbe :t&IDei of any peliOn nMnJ as 4ir~\or of tbe IlOD.pro!5\ orgJDizatioD or as InI'lee or benetidlry Dr trunor of Ibe trust. N/A Have you had more than S2SO werth of !!usllleu transacted with 117)' mRII~r 01 \be 01)' aWf, Boardl, Colrtlnlaale>>>, Commltt=s, ane! Counci] withmlbe put twelve IDouths? Ycs_ No_ If yes, please iIIIIlcal. peI$OD(s}: )'1_ Identify "ell and CYC:)' penon, ineh.4in. III)' IplllI, I:ZIIpl~ CIONulta1ltl, or m4epe1l4e111 CIOntraetol'5 who you ba-YC _iJDed 10 r.p=1 )'0\1 before the (1)' ID tkIJ manu. . GARY CINTI - CINTI LAND PLANNING BILL OSTREM - EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT ROGER BHATIA - RICK ENGINEERING CO. BRUCE SLOAN - EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT KENT ADEN - EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT CO. Have you aDIIIor )'Out otrl=n or Iptl, In 111. lureplC, CODutbulat more IlIuI $1,000 to a CbuDc:illDember In llIe c:urrent or pn:cedln, elec:tlOD period? YeI_ No..!... U yea. ltate wttIdI CoVDc:UIDRllber(I): lale: · · · (NOTE: A1IIC alldldouI.... / / //"~ ~/~I~~uac:tOr/lppHC&II! WILLIAM T. OSTREM, PROJECT DIRECTOR Prill! or !)'pC nalDe of CIOlluaAOrllppllClllt lEa!3.b4l;/Jlvlla .""""W'tJ~.._~~...~jIiJIJ"""".t.1 ~-' ~"'''.~-r- "-~"'-r- . _--.~........,.".,~~ .8 ... -v 0IIw..... ...w ~ ao- P'WI ~ ~.O'. ~ ., __ #fO/JIIJuJ....~ .,.",.... ,.,.. ., -... -' "I .... -. .....