HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1994/11/09 (3)
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 9, 1994
Page 1
2.
PUBLIC HEARING:
PCS-95-0l: Consideration of tentative subdivision map for
Fieldstone Crest. Chula Vista Tract 95-01 - Western Salt Companv
A. BACKGROUND
1. The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Fieldstone Crest,
Chula Vista Tract 95-01, in order to subdivide 9.21 acres of land into forty three (43)
lots consisting of forty (40) single-family residential lots, two (2) open space lots totaling
.67 acres (Lot A and C), and one (1) .05 acre access corridor lot (Lot B). The project
site is located at the southwest corner of Clubhouse Drive and Hunte Parkway within the
EastLake Greens Planned Community (see locator/attachment #1).
2. An Initial Study, IS-94-19 was previously prepared in conjunction with the recent
amendment to the EastLake II General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan,
EastLake II Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality
Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastLake Greens
Master Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3).
The Environmental Review Coordinator has found that the project implements and fal1s
under the purview of IS-94-19 and that no new affects could occur and no new mitigation
measures are required for PCS-95-01.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution PCS-95-01 recommending that the
City Council approve the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map in accordance with the
attached draft City Council Resolution, based on the findings and subject to the
conditions contained therein.
C. DISCUSSION
L Zoning and land use.
Site
PC (Planned Community) - Residential
Vacant (target density - 44 du)
North
South
East
West
PC (Planned Community) - Open Space
PC (Planned Community) - Residential
PC (Planned Community) - Residential
PC (Planned Community) - Open Space
EastLake Country Club Park
Vacant
Vacant
EastLake Golf Course
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 9, 1994
Page 2
2. Existing site characteristics.
The subject site is located at the southwest corner of Hunte Parkway and Clubhouse
Drive within the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned
Community.
The site is bounded to the north by Clubhouse Drive, to the east by Hunte Parkway, to
the south by unimproved land designated for residential development, and to the west by
the EastLake Golf Course (see locator, Attaclunent 1).
The 9.21 acre parcel has been graded as part of the EastLake mass grading program and
is elevated approximately 10-12 feet above street level along Hunte Parkway. The
relative elevation of the site to the street decreases from 10 feet above street level at the
Hunte Parkway/Clubhouse Drive intersection to approximately 7 feet below street level
at the northwesterly portion of the parcel along Clubhouse Drive. The property slopes
downward from a northerly to southerly direction and is surrounded by 2:1 open space
slopes except for a small segment along the north property line which is relatively level
with Clubhouse Drive.
3. Proposed development.
The proposed development involves minor regrading of the site, construction of 40
single-family detached homes on lots averaging approximately 6,500 sq. ft. construction
of on-site and off-site improvements necessary to serve the subject subdivision inclusive
of the Orange Avenue sewer pump station which will be located approximately 1/4 mile
east of the Orange A venue and Hunte Parkway intersection and access road thereto and
improvement of an open space landscape buffer adjacent to the north and east side of the
property (Lot A and C). The proposal also includes development of a golf course trail
access corridor parcel (Lot B) in conjunction with the golf course vista point required by
the EastLake Greens SPA Trails Plan (Attaclunent #2). Said golf course trail access
corridor parcel (Lot B) and golf course vista point are required to be improved prior to
or concurrently with the development of the subject parcel (Resolution 17618, special
condition of approval #2). Staff recommends that the golf course trail improvements
associated with the Fieldstone Crest development be constructed in accordance with the
submitted plans (attaclunent #7) and concurrently with the improvement of Street A.
4. Tentative Subdivision Map.
The tentative Subdivision Map will create 43 lots. Access to the project will be provided
via Clubhouse Drive. A linear centrally located spine road (Street A) and three cul-de-
sacs/knuckles will provide access to the individual lots .
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of November 9, 1994
Page 3
a. Compliance with Eastlake Greens SPA Plan
Residential units will be constructed on Lots 1 to 40. The project at buildout will have
a density of 4.3 du/ac and will be in compliance with the recently approved EastLake
Greens SPA Plan amendment density range (0-5 du/ac) for the project site and below the
target density (4.9 du/ac) and target dwelling unit number (44 du).
b. Compliance with Planned Community Regulations
The Land Use Group and District designations for the subject site have been recently
amended from RM-44 (Residential Multi-Family/ 44 District) to RS-7 (Residential
Single-Family/7 District). As a result of that amendment, development of the site is
subject to compliance with the RS-7 residential property development standards, inclusive
of the minimum 100ft. lot depth requirement described in the Eastlake II (Eastlake I
Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations. Lot 18, 19,27,31,32,38, and 39
are slightly deficient in terms of compliance with said lot depth requirement. Staff
recommends that prior to the approval of the final subdivision map for Fieldstone Crest
appropriate lot line adjustments be made in order for the project to meet the applicable
100 ft. lot depth requirement.
c. Compliance with Residential Design Guidelines
The site plan and architectural approval process is not applicable to projects within the
RS district. Compliance with the site plan review requirements and residential design
guidelines will be ensured during the building permit review stage.
Attachments
1. Locator
2. EastLake Greens SPA Trails Plan
3. Planning Commission Resolution
4. Draft City Council Resolution
5. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring Program for IS-94-19
6. Tentative Subdivision Map (peS 95-01)
7. Golf Course Trail conceptual development plan
8. Disclosure Statement
(f: \home\planning\amy\pcs950 1 . pc)
LOCATOR
..
,
~
!
:r:
~~
PROJECT SITE
&
~
.
o
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR APPLICANT: WESTERN SALT CO. PROJECT OESCRIPTION:
SUBDMSION: FIELDSTONE CREST
C) ADDRESS: INTERSEC110N OF CLUBHOUSE DR. Request: Construction of 40 single
A BUNTE PARKWAY family dweUings at EasUake Greens
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: Unit 27.
NORTH 1" = 400' PCS - 95 - 01
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA TRAILS PLAN
"'----
l~ ~- .n :~~,;;: ,;;~-~ ~~;~~~~-,-~-~ - r ~ ~/
Iii < ":'~.:::: ~ \--
,if ~ :, ~~~-/- '\
!~boot1 ,!~ i, I;:.~" ~:;:;,-=-- \~
-r..........'f!.f:!r1~o. I [ ~ "~. ,I" ___ \.
r ~~:,~......Zjt:t,.. ~~~~ c t-;f;~-1 n<
, ~ t;~& .....p~tzQQ.Q2..;..................f~H~~\C~i~ ;\~i
I gi~"".' CI:II d.'o;-c.,,".' -~ ____
; 2.~ ~ // "":f .N/- ....::-:"'"""--_~_. -Ar--
) -< / v:~ .... atJlifl,!i;;!:/ "'~~~.......~.~ -i\
-~~1015~I1;J~C :lli'J~1Qt!'!~""";r.'l:A I~""g,~- """. \
/ e~~..".."......" ~....-...... ~ - ~~W~ I l V ~\
,/ A~~".._.:. J \ .'r,p..ll~ '-'\ '0; '-:;~~~--'n/~ '\
' ~~io. \ - - /\ j..~wJl ' ') .~:--.; 0
-----------------' /.~~'" ~~ ,,"'-...Q % :J t. -/ '\' '\:,a--~'-_ -~.
~...,. -~p C----~(~ ~..A-!)] I ~,'" (! -\ ~~ -''''~ \ \,,!;
.JII!1.'i.... \ ::--=- "\ ,"J!~ / _~~ - ~~ \....,( \ \...~ ,''v.!'.~ \ t\
~~ -,v \\1\ l \..I~.O f/;j ~ '\(~ \\ ~~\-f ~"" ," (' ""....._
'",,'I';-. \', ,,' J ";:1.... . .,/1 C, \ ,) \\\, IrJ~ S.. ~~ ".J \ -
1'eI\.." \ \ ~\ _J I.u il/ _....:J \\\ \\ ~/\ ..~'\\ tr
(f ~.. 'I r'1 J\ C I '11:b~,[ C\~\ ~\...J '\,/~, .~~~ )\~ r \
) ~~.. r\ \\._J '\ I I ,.J ~': I 11--=--_- r-~J\ - \)\ ~)~V' ~~.~~~~\\_ \ \\\
~~.. ~\ ,~ Ii I" '\ ., ~G:)" I IJ \~f;;;;:Il ~\\ ~\""\
A /. " I I \ I \ -- I 'I \. \\ r-III\\ \
\' ""'..~. ,~~~~/ -, ',"-, ", (~\ \ "I~ r- Q}nf'\~ ,.r~ '1'1' - II
~.,'" '-->7 = d-"-" tJ ""~I ) I.,e.\ ~"\ '--~ ;--Y-=="/, I \\ \"'
11:' \( C --~-~ ;' , '/ ..'. ~ 1, : ie) c, ", '- " ..:I,~
\ It ~~: \~--==-~::=--/-" ('-~~ (r ~f1')/~-(}'\\ ) ~~/~~:::.~~~-<--- ~-- (~, ~Ii. i ,-I ~'III, aij'\
~I -..... I r-- { IA '{ I,' 1\ " - ~ ~""""~ 'l'11 \ L
\ ~a11, 1'"~;'d er- " ,('_J /iF,?' .u' / )~ "-rr . O"().~., :::il lil
\ ~EI~lt--, _~CJ V-\~#YA I / ._,- " ~ 11"1' r-tJll
\ [~I~-<'- \:.rc7~'.o~"'T.i/'-~'_..i:rr; - ( \~" '-B~-- 'I /;!"'~~~~ ~1~:(, i till
'~ ~\mI~" ~- ,,-V,'( I ," ~/' - ...~~ /",;.;;:;=-O?=-~~~~_~.y: ", 'i,) (1;'1,'
'" ,.)c' "~)~~--v)'" ~ ~_~z- -~~~-~ .....-::::;:~"~y" \1',,' Q ',L,,..."/
",,'~ -' ( , v_:%/ . "'-.;:-.: ~ I ,,-~- ':-11:' /
, - ~~..' ,~, / I :;,::";"- ":<~ ,~S:_));//
'~ ...~~,.~.~ .~S~:,~~,,' ~'/ ~~~~\ ;;. ~ ~
" "~~..'" ':{:', /A~~~ '\,~<~-~/ /
:'o.~ "~A""'" 'f'( ~"f;?,. /' . .,,~ 0,//
\, '\ ; ~~~;;,'ttA~ :.fY . '\". //
, .....,<w~~,~. . '\V;/
~ ()(j~// , /
\\ C . c..:~;;~ \/ :'
\\9~~~
\ ,-:
Ia~..
(j)~
^,In
~[m~
~gmh
~~Z~
~; lI'm
(
:[3
IT]
;
.
\
\
\
j
\
(
f
I
f
.
I
.
I
z
.
;;
~.
C
~
C
s;
~
J
~
f
~
I;
f
~
~
~
IEJ
1
J U f~
!< ;>j!
g ~.. ~i
!II -~il
! ~
[
LJ'.
.
LJ !
J'] !
..
i
~
[
:e
II-
~
2'
~
<
..
"
l
f
i
~
~.
fij
JJ
~
Golf r'ourse Viewpoint/Rest ,......op
(
r-- ALTERNATE WITH 1'REL..uS I BENCH
VEWPONTIAEST STOP
11IAI._
Lot/Fence lin. .ubject 10 ,.y~
YEW fUCE/WAU.
I
.'1
IGYMD_
Typical Golf Course Viewpoint/Rest Stop
TraM Entering Golf Course
(
~
~
'......
~
>
I
~-
~
.~
~g
~i
~~
I
I ~ f
~..:
~~.:,
~'
B'WDE~
r.EAI<JERNG TRAL
8'" HIGH CCM.tNTy WAlL
(Sl)EYARD WAlL)
~
"'!';
TRAL..........
CONCRETE WAU<
.
w
aD
Cross Section A-A
Trail at Public Street
YEW
YEW FeNCElWAU.
~ ~ EXlSTN3 L.AKJSCAPNG
,., /'~.. WDE CONCAETC ~TRAL
) ~F /
;~, /'
r~
"'":. .--.4.- "---"'.r-_
~..,.;I:'-
(
...,"" OR
JlEAAY~SE'QAQI;
.-.
.
"'''''''
Cross Section B-B
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-95-01
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR FIELDSTONE
CREST, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-01
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on August 11, 1994 by Fieldstone
Communities Inc. ("Developer") and Western Salt Company ("Owner"), and
WHEREAS, the Owner and Developer requested in said application approval to subdivide
Unit 27 of Eastlake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3 located at the
southwest corner of Hunte Parkway and Clubhouse Drive into 43 lots containing a total of 40
dwelling units ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-94-19, of possible adverse environmental impacts of the
project was previously conducted in conjunction with the amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I expansion) General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan, EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality
Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastI-ake Greens Master
Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3) and Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program on IS-94-19 was adopted by the City Council on August 16,
1994; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) has concluded that the
proposed project implements and falls under the purview of Mitigated Negative Declaration
IS-94-19 and that no new affects could occur and no new mitigation measures are required for
PCS-95-01 and recommends readoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said tentative
subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners and residents within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10)
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.,
November 9, 1994, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby readopts Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the project in
accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
CounciL
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 9th day of November, 1994 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
(f:\home\planning\amyw\pcs95-01.pcr)
DRAFT
CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION
DRAFT RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS
ON THE TENT A TIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR FIELDSTONE
CREST, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-01, MAKING THE
NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR IS-94-19
1. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, is commonly known as Unit 27 of EastLake Greens Tentative
Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3; and for the purpose of general
description herein consists of 9.21 acres located at the southwest comer of Hunte
Parkway and Clubhouse Drive within the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning
Area of the EastLake Planned Community ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on August II, 1994 Fieldstone Communities, Inc. ("Developer")
and Western Salt Company ("Owner") filed a tentative subdivision map
application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and
requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Fieldstone Crest, Chula
Vista Tract 95-01 (known as Document No. on file with the office of
the City Clerk) in order to subdivide the Project Site into 43 lots ("Project"); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously
adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199 ("SPA"); and 3) a Tentative
Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15200
("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan
(AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation
Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16898 on
November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, SPA, TSM, AQIP and WCP amendment
previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994;
and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on November 9, 1994, and voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed
below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on December 6, 1994, on the Project and to
receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
determine and resolve as follows:
II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing on this project held on November 9, 1994, and the minutes and resolutions
resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
III. MITIGA TED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED;
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FINDINGS;
APPROVALS
A. Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and
considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
(known as Document No. on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and
comments thereon, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project
and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as
Document No. on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior to
approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
-2-
significant effect on the environment and thereby readopts the Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
B. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that the significant
environmental effect(s) identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be
reduced to below a level of significance if the mitigation measures in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are implemented. The Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby readopted to ensure that its
provisions are complied with.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance
with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines,
and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council.
VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for
EastLake Greens, Chula Vista Tract No. 88-3 is in conformance with the
elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use
The proposed density of 4.3 du/ac is in compliance with the previously
approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan density range (0-5 du/ac) for the
subject parcel.
b. Circulation
All of the on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the
subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer in
-3-
accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Financing Plan and
Development Agreement.
The public streets within the subdivision will be designed in accordance
with the City design standards and/or requirements. The adjoining street
system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of traffic from this and
other area projects.
c. Housing
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan area has been conditioned to provide a
minimum of 10% affordable housing including a mix of housing types and
lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various
apartment densities that will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for
persons of various incomes. The proposed single-family detached
residential housing type is consistent with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
d. Conservation
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for IS-94-19 addressed the goals and policies of the
Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of
this site to be consistent with these goals and policies.
e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space
The project site is located within the EastLake Greens SPA Plan area.
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open
space consistent with City policies. The project will implement in part
conditions of approval for the EastLake Greens SPA Plan requiring the
provision/construction of a golf course trail.
f. Seismic Safety
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of
the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site.
g. Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed
the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and
-4-
have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for
emergency services.
h. Noise
Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report
SEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 adequately
address the noise policy of the General Plan. All dwelling units within the
project will be required to be designed so as to not exceed the interior
noise level of 45 dBA. Additionally, all exterior private open space will
be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to
achieve a 65 dBA noise level for outside private areas.
i. Scenic Highway
The project site is located along the west side of Hunte Parkway, a
designated scenic highway.
The project, as conditioned, will be required to provide a landscape buffer
in conformance with landform grading and scenic highway principles of
the General Plan.
J. Bicycle Routes
Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned
Community area design and are presently in use. The public streets
within the project are of adequate width to accommodate bicycle travel
within the interior of the subdivision.
k. Public Buildings
No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is
subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies
that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the
optimum siting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as
required by Government Code Section 66473.1.
-5-
D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal
conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact
created by the proposed development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project
subject to the general and special conditions set forth below.
VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval of the foregoing Tentative Subdivision Map which is stated to be
conditioned on "General Conditions" is hereby conditioned as follows:
A. Project Site is Improved with Project
Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the
Project as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 except as
modified by this Resolution.
B. Implement Mitigation Measures
Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all
mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental
Impact Report for Eastlake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-94-l9.
C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, all portions of IS-94-
19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project.
D. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project.
Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled
conditions of approval of the EastLake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract
88-3 established by Resolution No. 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989
and shall remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and
provisions of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned
Community District Regulations, the Eastlake Greens Development Agreement,
-6-
the Water Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the
Public Facilities Financing Plan.
E. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan
Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Greens
Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer
to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City
Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision.
F. Project Phasing
Developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by
the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map,
if phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps.
The phasing plan shall include:
a. A site plan showing the lot lines and lot numbers, the phase lines and
phase numbers and number of dwelling units in each phase.
b. A table showing the phase number, the lots included in the phase and the
number of units included in each phase.
Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit
of development shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of
Planning. The City reserves the right to conditional approval of each final map
with requirement to provide said improvements, facilities and/or dedications as
necessary to provide adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police
and fire departments. The City Engineer and Planning Director may at their
discretion, modify the sequence of improvement construction should conditions
change to warrant such a revisions.
IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall:
-7-
STREETS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND IMPROVEMENTS
I. Design and construct all streets to meet the City standards for residential streets,
or as approved by the City Engineer. Submit improvement plans for approval by
the City Engineer detailing the horizontal and vertical alignment of said streets.
2. Guarantee the construction of all improvements (streets, sewers, Orange Avenue
sewer pump station, drainage, utilities, etc) deemed necessary to provide service
to the subject subdivision in accordance with City standards.
3. Submit and obtain approval from the Director of Planning and City Engineer for
street names.
4. Construct an 8 ft. wide sidewalk for the Golf Course Neighborhood Trail as
shown on the Eastlake Greens Trails Plan along Hunte Parkway from So.
Greensview Drive to the southerly boundary of Unit 27.
5. Develop the golf course trail access corridor parcel (Lot B) and the golf course
vista point in accordance with the Golf Course Trail conceptual development plan
attached thereto and made a part thereon and construct all improvements indicated
thereon concurrently with the improvement of Street A.
6. Provide for the maintenance of the proposed sewer pump station on East Orange
Avenue in accordance with Council Policy #570-03 adopted by Resolution 17491
and the Agreement to Provide Sewer Pump Station Maintenance for the Eastlake
Greens and amendments thereto.
7. Provide a paved access road, 14' minimum width, to the sewer pump station and
grant to the City general utility and access easements over the sewer pump station
site and access road.
8. Provide to the City a letter from Otay Municipal Water District indicating that the
assessments/bonded indebtedness for all parcels dedicated to the City have been
paid or that no assessments exist on the parcel(s).
9. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Otay Water District that the
subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage
facilities.
-8-
GRADING
10. Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to the original document prepared
by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer.
11. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation
control plan together with grading plans.
12. Submit a list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on
fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations.
13. Post bonds or other security acceptable to the City to guarantee completion of the
grading of Orange A venue from Hunte Parkway to the westerly boundary of the
San Diego Gas and Electric easement.
The bonds or security required above shall be in an amount equal to 150% of the
grading costs of the alignment of the particular streets for which the bond or
security is being posted, or as approved by the City Engineer, as well as the
adjacent slopes at a 2: 1 slope and any appurtenant drainage structures required
for proper drainage of the graded area. The bonds or security may provide for
a reduction in the amount thereof to 110% of the original amount thereof upon
approval by the City of the plans for such grading work and to 25 % of the
original amount thereof upon substantial completion of such grading work as
determined by the City Engineer.
AGREEMENTS
14. Enter into an agreement with the City whereby:
a. The developer agrees the City may withhold building permits for any units
in the subject subdivision if anyone of the following occur:
(1) Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
(2) Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services
exceed the adopted City threshold standards.
b. The developer agrees that the City may withhold building permits for any
of the proposed development if the required public facilities, as identified
in the PFFP or as amended or otherwise conditioned have not been
completed or constructed to satisfaction of the City. The developer may
-9-
propose changes in the timing and sequencing of development and the
construction of improvements affected. In such case, the PFFP may be
amended as approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer.
15. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by
the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any
approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision
pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the Map Act provided the City promptly notifies
the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that
the City fully cooperates in the defense.
16. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or
increase flow of drainage resulting from this project.
17. Agree to insure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company")
are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television
service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only
those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance
with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further
compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating
and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been,
or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS
18. Offer to grant in fee to the City on the Final Map open space Lot "A" and "C".
The minimum width of Lot "A" and Lot "C" shall be 10 feet.
19. Offer to grant in fee to the Homeowners' Association corridor lot "B".
20. Submit a list of all facilities located on open space lots to be maintained by the
existing Eastlake Open Space District No.1. This list shall include a description,
quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all facilities
located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls, fences, water
fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage structures and
landscaping. Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for open space
maintenance. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the number of
acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the estimation of a
maintenance budget thereof.
-10-
21. Include open space lot "A" and "C" in the EastLake Open Space District No. 1.
Corridor lot "B" shall be privately maintained.
22. Agree to grant in fee to the City public access easements over paved walkways
to Golf Course Trail vista points as approved by the City Engineer and the
Director of Parks & Recreation Department.
23. Comply with the terms and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement
for Assessment District 94-1, CO 94-064, approved by Council Resolution
R17483 as said terms and conditions may be applicable to this development at
such time as said assessment district is formed.
24. Make payment to reduce the debt on the subject property as the result of lower
density than assumed for the assessment districts at the time of District formation.
The amount of payment is determined by multiplying the difference between the
actual and assumed number of units multiplied by the estimated assessment per
unit.
25. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment
districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary. Request
apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $40/unit/district to
cover costs.
26. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that
additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation
DIF Fund, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the
home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the
assessment district's Engineer's Report. Submit disclosure form for the approval
of the City Engineer.
MISCELLANEOUS
27. Make the necessary lot line adjustments to bring lot #18, 19,27,31,32,38 and
39 in compliance with the RS- 7 district lot depth residential property development
standard.
28. Conduct an acoustical analysis to determine site specific noise impacts and
mitigation measures prior to issuance of grading permits or construct a noise
attenuation wall along the length of the projects' frontage with Hunte Parkway.
The design and location of said noise attenuation wall is subject to review and
approval by the Director of Planning.
-11-
29. Submit a comprehensive wall and fence program(s) for review and approval by
the Director of Planning prior to approval of the grading plan and/or Final Map.
30. Submit a comprehensive landscape plan for Lot A, Band C to the City Landscape
Architect for review and approval prior to approval of the grading plan. Submit
detailed irrigation plans and water management guidelines for all landscaping in
accordance with the Chula Vista Design Manual. The landscaping format for the
project shall be in substantial conformance with Section 6.4 (General Landscape
Concept) of the Eastlake Greens SPA.
31. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (1983).
32. Submit copies of Final Maps in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior
to approval of each Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of
the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the
information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in
duplicate on 5-1/2 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map.
X. CODE REQUIREMENT REMINDERS
1. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision
Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
2. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal
Code requirements.
3. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy:
a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees.
b. Signal Participation Fees.
c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection
fees.
d. Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January 1, 1995).
e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows Development Impact Fees
f. Salt Creek Sewer Basin Development Impact Fee
-12-
Pay the amount of said fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits.
4. Install required fire hydrants prior to delivery of any combustible construction
materials.
5. Install residential fire sprinkler systems, as deemed necessary by the Fire
Marshal.
XL CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation
to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval
of this Resolution.
XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
XIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined
by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this
resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(f:\home\planning\amyw\fie1dstn.ccr)
-13-
~
...
-,
-.
~?Y
~
~
PROJECT SITE
CHULA VI S T A PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR APPLICANT:WESTERN SALT CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
~UBDMSION: FIELDSTONE CREST
C9 ADDRESS: INTERSECTJON OF CLUBHOUSE DR. Request: Construction of 40 .ingle
A BUNTE PARKWAY family dwellings at Easdake Greens
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: Unit 17. EXHIBIT A
NORTH 1" = 400' PCS - 9S - 01
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-19
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Mitigated Negal~"e Declaration
r>/1p- ('
PROJECT NAME: Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA and the formation
of an Assessment District for various public improvements
PROJECT LOCATION: South of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte
Parkway
PROJECT APPLICANT: Eastlake Development Company
CASE NO: IS-94-19
DATE: February 28, 1994
A. Proiect Setting
The project site located south of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and Hunte
Parkway and this general vicinity (Eastlake and Otay Ranch) do not involve any substantial
soil or any geotechnical hazards that would impact the proposed project.
The project is located within the San Diego air basin which is an air quality non-attainment
basin. The project includes a 97 dwelling unit increase because of the expansion in land
area of the Greens SPA. This will not result in a substantial increase in emission into the
air basin or any substantial degradation in air quality.
However, because the increase in the projected units is more than 50, compliance with the
City requirement for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. Thus, this less-than-
significant impact will be further reduced.
The project site involves the Telegraph Canyon Creek, Poggi Canyon Creek and Salt Creek
drainage basins. Future regional facilities in these basins may neeq additional cumulative
capacities to serve the 22.7 additional acres being added to the SPA boundary but the
impacts of this project would not be significant. These drainage courses do not enter any
potable water sources nor are they a significant source of any ground water.
This property has been used for agricultural purposes for many decades and is void of any
significant vegetation or animal life. The project could affect raptor habitats but given the
limited acreage this is not significant.
There are various streets in the project area which have traffic volumes that may result n
adverse noise levels. Once precise pad elevations rc:lative to street elevations are known,
specific mitigation will be identified and implemented. This residential project wilI not
result in any significant sources of light or glare.
The project as proposed is consistent with the other low-medium densities adjacent to and
in the vicinity of the project site and the population levels are consistent with the project
area.
Public facilities and services including transportation are available and adequate to s~ {ft..
the project site and vicinity. ::;.1_-::
- -
city of chula vista planning department CI1Y OF
environmental review .ection, CHULA VISTA
The underlying geological strata on the project site possess a high potential for significant
paleontological resources. Those areas which have been graded have been monitored and
any significant resources recovered. This monitoring will continue in the currently non-
graded areas.
Mitigation of any potential cultural resources on the project site was previously
implemented.
.
B. Proiect Descrintion
General Descrintion
The project is an amendment to the adopted Eastlake I General Development Plan (GDP),
which includes EastLake Greens; an amendment to the adopted Eastlake Greens SPA Plan
(SPA) and Tentative Tract Map; and the annexation of approximately 23 acres to the City
of Chula Vista. The amendments to the GDP and Tentative Tract Map are intended to
reflect those changes proposed in the SPA Plan. The changes in the SPA Plan are of the
following two categories:
1. Amending the GDP/SPA to include those parcels of the recent Land Swap General
Plan Amendment east of the SDG&E transmission easement (expansion of Parcels
R-IO, R-20, and R-23 for 97 additional units).
2. Transfers of units within the existing SPA boundary to reflect refmements with no
net increase of density.
3. The formation of an Assessment District to (94-1 Eastlake II) for the installation
of public facilities to serve the project.
Included is Table 1, the Adopted Site Utilization Plan and Table 2 which summarizes the
proposed residential changes.
Descrintion of Land Swan Area Amendment
Only those areas east of the transmission easement area included in this amendment. The
balance of the Land Swap Area (between the Otay Ranch and Eastlake), which was
recently the subject of a General Plan Amendment, will be covered by a separate
amendment. The purpose of including the areas in this proposed amendment separately is
because they are logical expansions of existing parcels within the Eastlake Greens SPA
plan. The parcels that are expanded by the recent GPA include Parcels R-tO, R-20 and R-
23. Upon favorable action, these areas are proposed to be annexed to the City of Chula
Vista. Following is a description of each of these parcels:
R-10: The realignment of Orange Avenue to the south expanded
this parcel's boundary. These expanded areas were designated Low-
Medium Density on the General Plan. The mid-point of the density
range (4.5 du/ac) is being proposed. The total increase for this
parcel is 79 du (67 du in the Land Swap Area and 12 du in areas
previously indicated as Orange Avenue/Future Urban).
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNlNGl1736.94
Page 2
TABLE 1
EastLake Greens site utilization Plan
Existing Residential Land Use statistics
Parcel Density Acres Target Target
Number Ranae Densitv units
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40
R-3 0-5 21.8 3.8 83
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105
R-6 0-5 17.4 5.0 88
R-7 5-15 10.7 6.0 65
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96
R-9 5-15 8.5 5.3 45
R-10 '5-15 27.9 6.0 167
R-11 5-15 14.6 6.3 92
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 84
R-15 5-15 11.6 7.6 88
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83
R-17 5-15 29.7 7.2 214
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158
R-20 5-15 13.6 12.0 164
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.5 146
R-23 5-15 13.7 15.0 205
R-24 15-25 5.0 10.0 50
R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 74
R-26* 15-25 13.3 4.5 60
R-27* 25+ 8.9 4.5 40
R-28* 25+ 6.1 4.5 27
'l'OTAL 412 . 4 ac 2774 du
*Interim Designation
~.
TABLE 2
EastLake Greens Site utilization Plan
Proposed Residential Land Use statistics
Parcel Density Acres Target Target Xncrease(+)
Number Ranae Densitv units Decreasel-\
R-l 0-5 19.7 2.7 54 0
R-2 0-5 14.7 2.7 40 0
R-3 0-5 21.8 4.7 102 +19
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0
R-6 5-15 17.4 5.1 88 0
R-7 5-15 10.7 5.6 60 -5
R-8 5-15 16.4 5.9 96 0
R-9* 5-15 8.5 5.3 45 0
R-10 5-15 45.4 5.4 246 +79
R-11 5-15 14.6 6.0 87 -5
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 93 0
R-13 5-15 22.6 6.3 142 0
R-14 5-15 11.4 7.4 86 +2
R-15 5-15 11.6 6.5 65 -23
R-16 5-15 10.5 7.9 83 0
R-17 5-15 '29.7 7.2 214 0
R-18 5-15 9.9 8.8 87 0
R-19 5-15 14.9 10.6 158 0
R-20 5-15 15.7 9.2 153 +11
R-21 5-15 10.0 12.0 120 0
R-22 5-15 10.8 13.1 141 -5
R-23 5-15 15.8 13.5 214 +9
R-24 5-15 5.0 10.0 <46 -4
R-25 5-15 7.4 10.0 78 +4
R-26* 5-15 13.3 4.5 60. 0
R-27 0-5 8.9 4.9 44 +4
R-28 5-15 6.1 9.8. 60 +33
TOTAL 434.1 ac 6.6 2871 du +97
*Interim Designation: Parcel subject to ruture SPA AIIIenClment
to be consistent with the General Plan.
1-11-94
R-20: This parcel is expanded by a 2.1 acre triangle adjacent to the
SDG&E easement. The new area is computed at the mid-point of
the Low-Medium density range (4.5 du/ac). A reduction is proposed
for the parcel as a whole to reflect cUlTent planning/marketing.
R-23: This parcel is identical to the changes for R-20, except that
no decrease in the density is proposed. A net increase of 9 units are
proposed for this 2.1 acre addition to the SPA.
A total increase of 22.7 acres and 97 du are included in these three parcels.
Description of Density Transfers
This amendment includes density transfers within the existing SPA boundary to reflect
current planning/marketing. These changes do not increase the number of units (2774 du)
previously adopted. Following is a summary of the density transfers. Refer also to Table
2 for a composite of both density transfers and additions resulting from the additional Land
Swap Areas.
Parcel Number
R-3
R-7
R-ll
R-14
R-15
R-20
R-22
R-24
R-25
R-27
R-28
TOTAL
DU Increase DU Decrease
+19
-5
-5
+2
-23
-20
-5
-4
+4
+4
+33
+62 -62
Description of Assessment District Work
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the
following:
1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street
lighting and landscaping within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
WPC F,IHOME\PLANNlNGl1736.94
Page 3
2. Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm
drain facilities, sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities,
telephone facilities, gas facilities, television facilities as appropriate by applicable
state and federal statutes within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400
L.F., Phase 1).
b. South Greensview Drive from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400
L.F., Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920
L.F., Phase 3).
3.
DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading,
curb, gutter, sidewalk, medians, street lighting,
monumentation within the following rights-of-way:
storm drain, base, paving,
landscaping and street
a. Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300
L.F., Phase 2).
4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and storm
drain improvements within the following rights-of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F.,
Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F.,
Phase 2).
Discretionary Actions Associated (but not limited to) the Proiect Area
1. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment
3. Modification to the Eastlake Greens Site Utilization Plan
4. Establishment of District 94-1
5. Annexation
6. Tentative Subdivision Map
7. Design Review
C. Comoatibilitv with Zoning and Plans
The project is consistent with the overall General Plan. The project involves an
amendment to the more specific land use regulations of the Eastlake Greens General
Development Plan (GDP) and Sectional Planning Area Plan (SPA).
D. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached
Environmental Checklist Form) determined that the proposed project could have one or
Page 4
WPC F:IJlQME\PLANNING\J736.94
more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design and/or
specific mitigation measures will be implemented to reduce these effects to a level below
significant. With project revisions and/or mitigation, no significant environmental effects
will occur, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required.
This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070
of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures are set forth in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program which is attached as Attachment "A",
The following impacts are those that were detennined to be potentially significant and are
required to be mitigated to a level below significant. A discussion of each of these
potentially significant but mitigatable impacts from the proposed project follows.
Acoustics
The Initial Study has noted that traffic volume on roadways in and adjacent to the project
site could increase ambient noise to an unacceptable level.
E. Mitil!ation necessarv to avoid sil!llificant effects
Specific project mitigation measures are required to reduce potentially significant
environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level below
significant.Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have
been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached
Mitigation Monitoring Program <Attachment "A").
At the time of consideration . of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review
Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista
General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available. With this infonnation, it will
be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65 exterior dBA (CNEL).
These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast and must
validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Orl!anizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Crime Prevention, MaryJane Diosdada
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNINGlI736.94 Page 5
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Gary Cinti
Cinti Land Planning
3625 Midway Dr., #292
San Diego, CA 92110
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Chula Vista Municipal Code
Letter dated February 9, 1994 from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager,
EastLakeDevelopment Co. regarding sewage generation in sewage basins,
improvements and financing
Letter dated February 7, 1994, Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources
Division, Rick Engineering Co., regarding the adequacy of drainage systems
Letter dated February 18, 1994, Andy Schlaefli, Vice President Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. regarding the adequacy of the Transportation Circulation System
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as
any comments on the Initial Study and this Mitigated Negative Declaration, and
reflects the independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
EN 6 (Rev. 5/93)
WPC F,IIIOMElPLANNlNGI! 136.94
Page 6
Attachment A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
MITIGATION MEASURE
At the time of Consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or
Design Review Supplemental Acoustical Reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General plan Circulation
Element Roadways. At that time, the precise elevation of
roadways and residential development pads will be available.
With this information, it will be feasible to make an accurate
forecast of noise levels and the appropriate mitigation
measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 65
exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
MONITORING REOUIREMENT
Prior to g,ranting a tentative subdivision map or design review
approval, a no~se study forecasting noise levels and the
appropriate measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an
acceptable exterior 65 dBA CNEL is required,
OS.2
'"
'"
~
~
5-1
1/1
/l
,
,
II
I
OS031
.
I
PO-1
AREA OF DENSIlY TRANSFER
. ADDED TO SPA BOUNDARY
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
jC) APPLICANT: Eastlake Development CO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
EASTLAKE GREENS
ADDRESS: 900 LaDe Avenue General Development Plan Amendment
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: and SPA Amendment
l ~RTH NO SCALE 18-94-19 .
Case No. IS-94-19
\
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1. Name of Proponent: EastIake Deve100ment Co.
2, Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 900 Lane Ave.. Suite 100,
Chu1a Vista. CA 91913
3. Date of Checklist: Februarv 24, 1994
4. Name of Proposal: EastIake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
5, Initial Study Number: IS-94-19
Environmental Impacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: ~ MAYBE m
a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in
geologic substructUres? [J [J .
b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or
overcovering of the soil? [J . [J
c. Change in topography or ground surface
relief featureS? [J . [J
d. The destruction, covering or modification
of any unique geologic or physical featureS? [J [J .
e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of
soils, either on or off the site? [J . [J
f, Changes in deposition or erosion of beach
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition
or erosion which may modify the channel of
a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or
any bay, inlet or lake? [J [J .
g. Exposure of people or propertY to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? [J [J .
Page'
WI'C F:IJI()MIN'V.!OONGI1736.94
g.
Exposure of people or property to geologic
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
o
o
.
Comments:
The project is proposed for an urbanizing area of eastern Chula Vista. There have no finding
of significant problems in the areas of geology soils or erosion. Generalized and more
specific substantiation of the geotechnical and soil suitability of the project site is in the City
of Chula Vista General Plan FEIR (1989), EastLake FEIR (1982), EastLake SPA I FEIR
(1985), Eastlake Greens SPA & EastLake Trails Prewne & Annexation FSEIR (1989), and
Otay Ranch FPEIR (1993), and other more specific geological and soils reports on file with
the City of Chula Vista Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
There will be some modification of existing topography, however, this is considered very
minor and not significant given the lack of any significant topographic features.
a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
YES MAYBE NO
0 0 .
0 0 .
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
b. The creation of objectionable odors?
c.
Alteration of air movement, moisture, or
temperature, or any change in climate,
either locally or regionally?
o
o
.
Comments:
The San Diego air basin is a non-attainment air basin. The proposed project would
result in an increase of 97 units within the Eastlake Greens SPA. The emissions
from the traffic and energy generation associated with this project is not significant
when considering the overall generation of emissions. On a cumulative basis, the
emissions from this project are so minimal they are not cumulatively significant.
3.
Water. Will the Proposal result in:
YES MAYBE 00
a.
Changes in currents, or the course or
direction of water movements, in either
marine or fresh waters?
o
.
o
b.
Changes in absorption rates, drainage
patterns, or the rate and amount of
surface runoff?
o
o
.
c.
Alterations to the course or flow or
flood waters?
o
o
.
Page 8
WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\t736.94
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or any
alteration of surface water quality,
including but not limited to temperature.
dissolved oxygen or tmbidity?
D
D
.
f,
Aheration of the direction or rate of
flow of ground waters?
D
D
.
g,
Change in the quantity of ground waters,
either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of
an aquifer by cuts or excavations?
D
D
.
h.
Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public
water supplies?
D
D
.
L
Exposure of people or property to water
related hazards such as flooding or
tidal waves?
D
D
.
Comments:
The project site and vicinity do not involve any affected marine or fresh water areas, flood
waters, water bodies, or known ground water. There will be a minor change in absorption
rate which will result in minor-less-than-significant change in runoff (see letter from Dennis
C. Bowling dated 2(7/94).
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees. shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants )? D D .
b, Reduction of the numbers of any unique.
rare or endangered species of plants? D D .
c. Introduction of new species of plants into
into an area, or in a baIrier to the nonnal
replenishment of existing species? D [] .
d, Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? D D .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now
graded imd some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as
Raptor tenitory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size. this is not significant.
Page 9
WPC F:\IIOl\IE'l'I.AIINIG\l736.94
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
- -
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? D D .
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? D D .
c. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? D D .
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? D D .
Comments:
The project site has been used for agricultural purposes for decades and portions are now
graded and some areas have been developed (transfer area). This general area is used as
Raptor territory, however, with only a 22.7 acre increase in SPA size. this is not significant.
6, Noise. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Increases in existing noise levels? D D .
b. Exposure of people to severe noise
levels? D . D
Comments:
Traffic volumes on roadways in and adjacent to the project site could increase ambient
noise to an unacceptable level. At the time of consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map or Design Review. supplemental acoustical reports will be prepared
for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At
that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential development pads. With
this infonnation it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of noise levels and
the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
Ippropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an ICCCptable 6S
exterior dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout
traffic forecast and must validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL)
. standard.
PIF 10
wpc~G\1736.94
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce
new light or glare?
YES MAYBE NO
[J [J .
Comments:
This is primarily a residential project that will not produce any significant new light or glare.
If there are any unique sources proposed or established. they will be regulated through the
performance standards in the Municipal Code.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or
planned land use of an area?
~ MAYBE NO
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The proposed project is in a planned community which is internally consistent that
assures land use compatibility. The project expansion areas are within logical
boundaries (the SDG&E transmission lines and East Orange Avenue). The overall
external compatibility has been assured through coordination with the adjacent Otay
Ranch, Otay Water District facilities and SR 125 alignment
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
There are no other natural resources such as sand and gravel on site which would be
impacted by the proposed project.
10,
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an accident or
upset conditions'?
c
c
.
b.
Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
Given the residential character of the project there will be no involvement of hazardous
materials above that typical of a residential land use. The project will provide adequate'
circulation in the case of the need for an evacuation or response plan.
Page 11
Wl'CF,~(N736.M
11,
Population. Will the proposal alter the location
disttibution, density, or growth rate of the human
population or an area?
YES MAYBE 1ill
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The disnibution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area.
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or czeate a demand for additional
housing?
YES MAYBE NO
[]
[J
.
Comments:
The disnibution, density and growth of housing and population in this project are consistent
with planning for this area. The project will satisfy rather than czeate housing demands in
this area.
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? [J [] .
b. Effects on existing parking facilities,
or demand for new parking? [J [J .
c. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? [] [J .
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? [] [J .
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
ttaffic? [J [J .
f. Increase in ttaffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? [J [] .
g. A "large project" under the Congestion
Management Program? (An equivalent of
2400 or more average daily vehicle nips
or 200 or more peak -hour vehicle nips). [J [J .
Comments:
The project will not result in any significant impact to tran5portation/circu1ation/traffic (see
memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2121/94, and letter from Andy
Schlaefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94).
WPC r.'HOMEll'l.A!lNlNGII736.!14
Pile 12
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon or result in a need for new or altered
( governmental services in any of the following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? See page 6 of Appendix m of the D D .
Initial Study (City Data Sheet-Fire Dept.) and
16 Thresholds a. FirelEMS below,
b. Police protection? See comments in Chula Vista Police
Dept. Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review recommendation
dated 2/4/94 and 16 Thresholds b, D D .
c. Schools? EastLake Development Co. has made the Eastlake
projects participate in Cornmunity Facilities Districts
in the Sweetwater Union High School District, and the
Chula Vista Elementary School District to provide adequate
school services in the area. D D .
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
The project will be required to provide adequate
community and neighborhood parks to serve the
population of the project. See Initial Study,
Appendix m, Parks & Recreation Dept., page 7.
Also see 19 Recreation below. D D .
e. Libraries? The City of Chula Vista cunendy operates
a library at the campus of the Eastlake High School
during the hours the school library is not in operation.
On a longer term basis, there is a requirement for a library
site at Eastlake Village and a development impact fee to
finance the facility. D D .
f. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? There will be no substantial or unique impact on
the maintenance of anv public facility as a result of the
minimal increase in usage due to this project. D D .
g, Other governmental services? Other governmental agencies
were notified and contacted during the Initial Study;
no other potential impacts were identified. D D .
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Use of substantial amount of fuel or
energy? D D .
Page 13
wpc p,'8DMEII'L'IOONCN736.94
b,
Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources or energy, or require
the development of new sources of
energy?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The project would result in a minor increase in energy requirements typical of a
primarily residential project. This will not resuh in a substantial use of fuel or energy
nor new sources of energy.
16, Tbresbolds. Will the proposal adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards?
YES MAYBE NO
[J [J .
Comments:
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seven
Threshold Standards.
A. FirelEMS
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond
to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in
75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard
will be met, since the nearest fire station is one mile away and would be associated
with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
See Appendix m to the Initial Study. page #6.
B. Police
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority
I calls of 4,5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 ca11s
of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See comments in Chula Vista Police Department Crime Prevention Unit, Plan Review
Recommendation dated 2/4/94.
C, Traffic
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of
Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may
occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized interseetions. Intersections
west of I-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS, No intersection
may reach LOS "E" or "F' during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of
lUterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
WI'C p:'oHOMIN'LAIININCN736.94
p..o 14
The project will not result in any significant impact to tranSportation/circula1ion/traffic
(see memo from Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer, dated 2121/94, and letter from
Andy Sch1aefli, Vice President, Urban Systems Associates, dated 2/18/94).
D. parkslRecreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/1,OOO population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
The project will be required to provide adequate community
and neighborhood parks to serve the population of the project.
E, Drainage
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Dennis C. Bowling, Director Water Resources Division,m Rick
Engineering, dated 2nt94.; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer. dated
2123/94.
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed
project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
See letter from Bruce Sloan, Sr. Project Manager, Eastlake Development Co., dated
2/9/94; memo from Roger Daoust, Sr. Civil Engineer, dated 2123/94.
G. Water
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment. and ttansrnission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard,
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee
off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building pennit
issuance.
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health?
m MAYBE ~
a.
[J
[J
.
'M'C 1':'BOMEIfLANNIG\l736.94
Pili' 15
b,
Exposure of people to potential health
hazards?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The project site nor the operation of the project would result in any significant health hazard
or an exposure to such a hazard. Please refer to references in 4H above.
18, Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. The obstruction of any scenic vista or view
open to the public, or will the proposal
result in the creation of an aesthetically
offensive site open to public view? [J [J .
b. The destruction. or modification of a scenic route? [J [J .
Comments:
The project will not obstruct any public view or vistas. create any demonstrable negative
aesthetic effect or, at this level of review, impact a scenic route.
YES MAYBE !:iQ
Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opponunities?
19.
[J
.
[J
Comments:
The project will be required to meet the recreational needs of its residents in accordance with
City park standards which include recreational facility standards.
20.
Cultural Resources.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Will the proposal result in the alteration
of or the destruction or a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site?
[J
[J
.
b.
Will the proposal result in adverse
physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric or historic building, structure.
or object?
[J
[J
.
c.
Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic cultural values?
[J
[J
.
d.
Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area?
[J
[J
.
Pile 16
WI'C P.'H0ME"l'LANNING\1736.94
e,
Is the area identified on the City's
General Plan EIR as an area of high
potential for archeological resources?
D
D
.
Comments:
See Section 5,2.3 (pg. 5-3) of EIR,86-4 (Sch: 86052803).
Paleontological Resources. Will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction of paleontological
resources? .
21.
m. MAYBE ~
D
D
.
Comments:
See Section 4.7 (pg. 4-75) of EIR-86-4 (Sch: 860522803).
22,
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant
animal or eliminate important examples or the
major periods of California history or prehistory?
D
D
.
Comments:
As has been noted above in this checklist, the site is void of any biological resources and
therefore, would have no significant impact on any of these resources. Cultural resources
(prehistoric and historic) have been previously mitigated and no further action is necessary.
b,
Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term goals to the disadvantage of long-
tenn, environmental goals? (A short-term
impact on the environment is one which occurs in
a relatively brief, definitive period of time,
while long-tenn impacts will endure well into the
future.)
D
D
.
Comments:
The proposed project conform to the Chula Vista General Plan and therefOJe. the project
complies with the long term goals of the City of Chula Vista for the site.
Page 17
Wl'CF,~G\l736.9<I
c.
Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact two or
more separate resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those impacts on the
environment is significant.)
[]
[]
.
Comments:
The project impacts are so limited to preclude any significant cumulative impact. In the case
of air quality impacts, the increase of 97 units, or I maximum of 970 ADT, compared to the
existing, and approved units and ADT, the impact is minimal and less than significant. Also,
the site is void of any significant biological or cultural resources and paleontological resources
will be fully mitigated.
d.
Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
[]
[]
.
Comments:
At the time of consideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map or Design Review. supplemental
acoustical reports will be prepared for projects adjacent to Chula Vista General Plan
Circulation Element Roadways. At that time the precise elevation of roadways and residential
development pads. With this information it will be feasible to make an accurate forecast of
noise levels and the appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels and the
appropriate mitigation measures necessary to reduce noise levels to an acceptable 6S exterior
dBA (CNEL). These acoustical reports must be based on the latest buildout traffic forecast
and must validate the achievement of the 6S exterior dBA (CNEL) standard.
WI'C~(N7.l6.94
PIB. 18
Mitigation Measures
(To be completed by the Applicant)
I, as owner/owner in escrow.
&uct. Ill. S<..o~1\!
Sf(. ?Rn'.1 IIt:lt EIIsr("(id.. J)Et/ CO,
Print name
or
I, consuhant or agent"
~_ "'"""'" """'" 'P"ffioI........ _Im_.
- Z /Z~ 11'1'
Signature Date
Determination
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
o I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment. there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
~,;u;/c; </
~ ~D~/-f"'~b":"/)
Environmental Review Coo . ator' ,
Date
"If acting for a corporation. include capacity and company name.
WPC F:'ftOMEII'lAIINICJ\I736.94
Page 19
Case No. ~,c;- q'-l - \q
APPENDIX D
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706, StatUtes of 1990 - AB 3158)
II h is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either
individually or cumulatively on wildlife resowces and that a "Certificate of Fee
Exemption". shall be prepared for this project.
It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife, individually or
cumulatively and therefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the FISh and
Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk, ~.,..,. ~ ~ '" ~,d
~e-::>'c..:::.s.,"-, .;;""'<>. ~.. ~ \ R "\<:^ ~L.o.""" G-.<wN'>
G""",,-',' -I5~;::,..s..<:~~'\ Q\o.".
'-A ~.;./(-fC1,f)~)
Environmental Revi w Coordinator
OJ).;J~/'7 V
Date
WPC F~0MIN'IANNING\1736.9<I
Paae 20
-
.
Case No. IS -q<j-I'1
APPENDIX III
CITY DATA SHEET
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
D.
Current ZoninlZ on site: --:pc.. (~ .... .....:~
Nonh . .1
Sooili I. h
East I, '1
West ~ .,
Does the project confonn to the CUJm11 ZOnin~~ ~~""-...~~~')
general Plan land use ~::ati~.o~ ~it~::,::- ..i'?::~'::.~':~~ 6...-L:.' ~~~J<;S-(,~
South
East .:u.w- --...t--..~"'1 ^u.~7-I. ~3-" DcJ~~
West _", '~ I, 'I ~
~,~" I~~
Is the project compatible with the Genera] Plan Land Use Diagram' --M u..,...
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated'?
-.--
L
e.lJIt-(J'- -.
Is the project located adjacent 10 any scenic routes'? - I.. -;-
(If ,..~ _~~ "''''. """ .. p ~ '" ....... "" ""'" ,will', of ""
;~ . :~~~.:-~~.t~-J4'--
Schools
m,
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
IV.
Students
U.uts OeaeratinJ Qeuerated
School Can.citv EnrOlIment Prnnnsed J:'adors From Proiect
Ele"""'tlry ~.w *'l~' - - 47 .30 ~,
JtmiCl'HiJh ~v''';~ ~',:l9 ~~
Seaior Hip ~r.tL- If 7 .10 I 0
~~ ;:: ~!~~ ~GJ:L; ~t1t? JM~~.II
.Ib~~
:f!J.'L/'l1
D t
-~
~022.""". ICI,f))(III.ID2U))
'.1
. ~
APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN IS FOLDED TO m INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
.,.. F,', or,.,..... Offi,...,.,....'.,...,.I,..,C..,..<;,_u~~~, U"se.Onl '."
,Case.No..~.,
i'PPst:.!j.iriqt,"'Z<,.I ~
..,..,R...ec,.". dp, t,N...,.O.~. .,..
Date Rcc'd. ~
ASCCl'tlXiby .t)~)
.rt9jcct~o.FA. 'i
~tl9;~?".~.,...,
CIPNo,.. .,.. , .,',
Re1aIcid Case No.
INITIAL STUDY
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
A.
BACKGROUND
'.-._,. ..
1. Project Title Eastlake Greens GDP !SPA Amendment ',u/.,.. ,',
2. . Project Location (Street address or description)East of SR-125, North of,
Orange Ave, South of otay Lakes Rd.! Telegraph Canyon Rd.,
. and West of Hunte Parkway.
Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. NA
3, Brief Project Description The project is a transfer of D.U. within the
existing Eastlake Greens SPA (no net increase) and an expans~on of
the SPA boundary (22.7 ac and 97 dU).Refer to attached Project Descri]
4, Name of Applicant Eastlake Development company
Address 900 Lane Ave., Ste. 100 Fax# 421.,.1830 Phone 421-0127
City Chula Vista. State CA Zip 91913
S. Name of Preparer!Agent Gary Cinti - Cinti Land planning
Address 3625 Midway Dr., *292 Fax# 223-5108 Phone 223-7408
City San Diego State CA Zip 9211'0
Relation to Applicant Land Planning Consultant
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
a, Permits or approvals required.
_ General Plan Amendment
-X- RczoneJPrezone '
_ Grading Permit
_ TCD!a1i~e Parcel Map
_ Site Plan &: Arch. Review
. __ Special Use Permit
)( Design Review Application
X Tentative Subd. Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
__ Public Project
+- Annexation
___ Specific Plan
_ Conditional Use Permit
V.
_ anance
_ Coastal DevelOJllllCllt
A OIlIer Permit &"bP
~
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indicate the change in designation from
to
b, Enclosures or documents (IS required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
_ Gnding Plan
_ Parcel Map
. Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic hnpact Report
_ Haiardous Waste Assessment
Arch. Elevations
, = Landscape Plans
_Tentative Subd.Map
_ Improvement Plans
_ Soils Report
_ Geotechnical Report
_ Hydrological Study
_ Biological Study
_ Archaeological Study
Noise Assessment
= ~r Agency Permit
....x.....Other Project Descripti.
.
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1.
a.
161.4 (amend. area)
Land Area: square footage or acreage 8 C; J _ 2 (SPA area)
H land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose,
b. Docs the project involve the construction of new buildings. or will existing structure be
u~? Yes, see Project Description.
2. Complete this section. if project is residential or mixed use.
a. Type of development:_ Single Family _ Two Family ~ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium
b. Totalnumberof=ctures 2871 residential du permittted
c. Maximum height of structures varies per P.C. District Regulations
d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom .l2....
2 bedroom -1iA-
3 bedroom '..&.-
4 bedroom -liA-
Total Units 2871
e. Gross density (DU/lOtal aaes) 3 _ 4
f. Net density (DU/total aaes minils any dedication) 6. 6
g. Estimated project population to be determined
h. Estimated sale or rental price range to be determined
i Square footage of structure to be determined
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures per P.C" Regulations
k. Number of on-site parking spaces 10 be provided per P.C. Regulations
L Percent of site in road and paved surface to be determined
X Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use.
a. Type(s) of land use
b. Floor ~ Height of ~(s)
Co Type' of conslJUction used in the structUIe
d.
Desaibe ~r access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties
and stteets
Co
f.
Number of on-site parking spaces provided
Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
Bstimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
. ." .
g.
WPCoF.i~02I_(lW.I_"I(W.lcmnl
PI&" ~
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
j~ Type/extent.of operations not in enclosed buildings
. k. Hours of operation
L Type of exterior lighting
2<. , ,If project is other than residential. commercial or industrial complete this section.
, a. Type of project
b, Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g, Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional p~ject characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACfERISTICS
I. Will the project be required to obtain a permit through the Air Pollution Control District (APCD)?
No.
.'
2. Is any type of grading oreXCIvation of the property anticipated, ? Yes, based on future
subm1ttaiS.
If yes. complete ~e following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled. how many.cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
NA
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? NA
c.. How much area (sq. ft. or ~) will be graded? NA
d. What will be the: ~um depth of cut NA
. Average depth ,of cut NA
Maximum,depth of fill NA
Average depth offill NA
'~02I-A.') tRd-1020.931(W.11IZ2.931
PII:C 3
I
3, Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of
energy used <air conditioning, electrical appliance. heating equipment, etc.)
Nnrm-=-l TP~ i dential enerqy u.se.
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq, ft. or 1CreS)
None.
S.. If the project will result in any employment opportunities desaibe the IUItUre and type of these
, jobs. Construction related jobs.
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or IUbstances -be used or stored within
, '
the project site? NA
7. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? None in
exc~ss of those addressed in previousEIR.
8. Desaibe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project. and their points of
,access or comection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the follo~ing:
, new streets; street .widening; extension of gas, eleCtric. and sewer lines; cut and f1l1 slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None in excess of those previously'
identified for EastLake Greens. (refer ~o Eas~Lak@ Grp@n~PFFP).
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SE1TING
1. . Gcolol!V
Has a geology study been conducted On the propeny? Yes, see Eastlake Greens ErR.
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils report on the project site been made? Yes. see Eastlake Greens EIR.
(H yes. please attach)
2. Hvdrolol!V
, AIe any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site?
(H yes, explain in detail,)
L . Is there any surface evidence of a Sh~ow ground \vater table?
No. '
~01I-AJQ(II":I02O.9JI(IIct 1022.f.I)
Page <4
b. Axe there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
In previously approved facilities.
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply,
lake, reservoir or bay? No.
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? Potential
exists but would be mitigated by conditions to future T.T. map
, ,
e, bcsc:ribe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. To be determined
bv future submittals and previously approved tract map.
3, Noise
a. Axe there any noise sourr;:es in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
No. Future arterials may impact some areas.
b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? No.
4, Biology
a. Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? No.
b. Is the project site in a natUral or partially natural ~e? No .
c. If yes, has I biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes X No (Please attach a COPY.)Refer to previous EIR.
d. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and
species of trees, and which (if any) will be removed by the projec:L 5i te is semi-
developed with remnants of previous dry farming/cattle
grazing on the remainder~
5, Past Use of the Land
a. Axe there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? No.
b, Axe there any known paleontological reSources? No.
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
No.
d~ What was the land previously used for'! Dry farming/Cattle grazing
WI'C-.F:\H()MI,'ll'LANN1NOISTOREI>.I021.A...' (Rd. 1020.'JI (Ref. 10n.'J'
PageS
6. Curren! Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site,
**See answer below**
b. Describe all structures and land uses CUITently existing on adjacent propcny.
North Eastlake Business Center
South Vacant otay Ranch - Future development
~ Vacant - Future Eastlake Neighborhoods
vr~ Eastlake High School/Community Park and Future deve!opmer
7.
Social
L
b.
. . tlo-.ne on parcels proposeq
Are there any residents on Site'! If so, bow many/
Are there any current employment opportunities on site? No.
If so, how many and what type?
fCjlr an increase
1n units.
8. PIca.se provide any other infonnation which may assist in the evaluation of the proposCdprojec:t.
Sites have been fully evaluated in Eastlake Greens SPA EIR and
recent General Plan Amendment EIR for Land Swap areas.
See also attached Project Description for addit10na! aa~a.
**Answer to 6(a): Construction/structures exists on approx. one-half
of EastLake Greens. Parcels proposed for amend-
ment with existing structures are only being
amended to reflect existing conditions with no
increase in units.
WPC:f.\I~EDII02I""''IJ (Rot 10211.'13\ (Rot 1D22.9JI
Pqe6
E. CERTIFICATION
I. as awner/owner in escrow.
~~~~1ak~ -Development Company
Bruce Sloan. Proiect Manager
Print n&mC
or
I. consuhant or agent.
Print name
HEREBY AFFIRM. that to the best of my belief, the statements and infonnation herein contained are in all
respects true and comet and that all known infonnation concerning the project and its setting has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for
attachments thereto.
.
~
Owner/Owncr in Escrow Signature
or
Consukant or Agent Signature
/111/11
I f
Date
.If acting for a corPoration. include capacity and company name.
~021""'93 (Rd.I02O.93)(IW.ID22S3)
Paae 1
INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENT
(
Name of Applicant: Eastlake Development Company
Address: 900'Lane Ave., ste. lUU
City: Chula Vista SIaIc CA
Name 01 Authorized Reprcsenlalive Cn signatory): Bruce Sloan
Address: Qnn T.;:iIn~ Av~. _ ste 100
City . ~"n 1 J:a ,,~~ to::. State CA
Agreement Date:
Deposit Amount $ 7 5 0 . 00
This Agreement ("Agreement") between 1M City of 0IuIa VisIa, I c:harIcrcd municipal c:oIJIDnIIion ("City")
and the forenamed applicant fcran Initial Study (" Applicantj, eft'ecti\'C as 01 die Aar=ncnt Dale act forth aDovc,
Ii made with reference to the following CacIs:
Phone 421-0127
Zip 91913
Phone 471_0127
Zip 91913
Whereas, the Applicant has applied to 1M City for an Initial Study of the type afceref=nced ("Initial
Study") which the City has required to be obtained as I condition to permitting 1M Applicant to develop I parcel
of property; and,
Whereas. the City will incur expenses in order to process said Initial Study through 1M various departments
and before die various boards and commissions of 1M City ("Processing Services"); and,
Whereas, the purpose of Ibis ag=ment is to reimburse 1M City for aD expenses it will incur in connec:tion
with providing the Processing Services;
Now. therefore. the p:u1ics do hereby agree. in exchange for 1M mutu:ll promises beRin contained, as
follows:
L Applicant's Duty to Pay,
The Applicant shall pay all of die City's expenses incurred in providing Processing Service Ida1cd to
applicant's Initial Study, including all of 1M City's direct and overbead costs Ida1cd thereto. This duty of
die Applicant shall be referred to herein as the "Applicant's Duty to Pay."
A. Applicant's Deposit Duty
As p:u1iaJ perform:IIICC of 1M Applicant's Duty to Pay, the Applicantsha11 deposit 1M amount
aforereferenced ("Deposit"),
1. The Cily shall cbarJe its lawful eipcnses inamd in povidina Proccssina Services
. against the Appticant's DeposiL U. after the conclusion 01 proc:cssing 1M Applicant's
Initial Study ,lilY portion of Ihc Deposit remains, Ihc Cily shalllelUm said balance to the
Applicant without interest thereon. If. during 1M processing 01 1M Applicant's Initial
Study. Ibe amount 01 the Deposit bcc:omes exhausted. or is imminenUy likely to become
exhausted in 1M opinion of 1M City. upon notice ofsame by 1M City, 1M Applicant shall
forthwith provide such additional deposit as 1M City shall c:a1c:u1ate as IeIISOIIably
necessary to continue to provide Processing SeMc:es. The duty of 1M Applicant to
initiaUy deposit and 10 supplement said deposit IS herein required sha11 be known IS 1M
"Applicant's Deposit Duty",
n. City's Duty
The City shall. upon 1M c:ondition that the Applicant is not in breach of the Applicant', Duty to Pay or die
Applicant's Deposit Duty. use good faith to provide processing services in relation 10 1M ~cant's Initial
Study application. .
Page 8
~021""'93tltd.I02iD.93)cw.lon.93)
A. The City shall have no Ii:lbility hereunder to the Applic:mt for the fmlure 10 process the Applicant's
Initial Study applic:ltion, or for fmlure 10 process the Applicant's Initial Study within the lime
frame requested by the Applicant or estim:lled by the City.
B, By execution of this agreement. the Applicant sha1I have no right 10 direct or otherwise influcncc
the conduct of the Initial Study for which the applicant has applied. The City sha1I use its
disa'clion in evaluating the Applicant's Initial Study application wilbout regard to the Applicant's
promise to pay for the Processing ScMccs, or tIi executiOll of the AgrcemcnL
m. Remedies
A. Suspension of Processing
In addition 10 all 0Ihcc rights and remedies which the City shall otherwise have at law or equity,
the City has the right to suspend and/or withhold the JIooccs..dlg of the JniIjaJ-Study which i= the
subject m:lUer of this Agreement, IS well IS the lnili:ll Study which m:lY be the subject m:l1Icr of
any other Pcnnit which Applicant has before the City.
B. Civil CoUection
In additiOllto all other rights and ranedics which the City shall oChcrwisc have all law or equity,
the City has the right to coUect all sums which arc or m:lY become due hereunder by civil action,
and upon instituting litiption to collect same, the prevailing party shall be entitled to reason:Ible
attorney's fees h:Id costs.
IV. Miscc1Iancous
A. Notices
All notices, dcm:Inds or requests prQvided for or penniued to be given pursuant 10 this Agreement '
must be in writing. AU notices. demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed 10
h:lvc been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States nuill.
addressed to such party, postage prepaid, rcgistttcd or certified, with return receipt requested, at
the addresses identified adj:lcent to the sigNltuI'CS of the parties rcprcscntcd.
B. Governing LawNenue
This Agrccmcnt shall be govcmcd by and COI\SIIIICd in acc:ord:mcc with the Laws of the Slate of
California. Any action arising under or rebting to this Agreement shall be brought only in the
federal or Slate COW1S located in San Diego County. State of California. and if applicable, the City
of Chub vistiI, or IS dose thereto IS possible, Venue for this agreement, and performance
hereunder. shall be the City orOluta Vista.,
C. Multiple Signalories
H there are multiple signatories to this qreement 011 bcha1f of App1ic:ant, each or such sigNllories
shaJI be jointly and sevaally liable for the performance or Applicant's duties herein set forth.
D. Signatory Authority
The sign:llory 10 this agreement hereby wananlS and rcprcscnlS that it is the duly designated agent
for the Applicant and bas been duly authorized by the Applicant to execute this Agreement 011
behalf of the Applicant. Sign:llory shall be personally liable for Applicant's Duty 10 Pay and
Applicant's Duty to Deposit in the event it has not been authorized 10 execute this Agreement by
the Applic:mt,
WfCo.F:lllOMM.ANN1N021.....') (Ret 1020.9)) (Itd'. 1022.93)
Poge 9
E. Hold Hannless
Applicant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City. its e\cc:ted and appointed orrlCU'S
and employees, from and 19:Unst all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including
without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of processing Applicant's Initia1 Study. except only
for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City. incuned by
the City. its ofrlCCf'S, agents. or employees in defending against such claims. wheIhcr the s:une
proceed 10 judgement or not. Funhcr. the Applicant, at its own expense, shall, upon wrillen
~ by the City. defend any .uch suit or action brought against the City, its orrlCelS, agents.
or employees. Applicant's indemnifcation oC the City shall be limited by any prior or subsequent
declaration by the ApplicanL
'F, Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures,
No suit or atbitration shall be brought arising out oC this agreement. against die City Unless a claim
has rust been presented in writing and rtled with the City of Chula Vista and KIed upon by the
City of Chub Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 oC the ChuIa Vista
Municip31 Code. as s:une may from time 10 time be amended. the provisions of which are
incorporated by the reference as if fully set forth herein. and such policies and procedures used by
the City in the implementation of same, Upon request by the City, the Applicant shall meet and
confer in good faith with the c.1ty for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this
AgreemenL
Now. therefore. the parties hereto, I!8ving read and understood the terms and c:onditions of this agreement,
do hereby express their consent 10 the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto,
City
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
~:~~
Dated: / / 11/1'1 .
I I
Bruce Sloan, Project Mgr.
Eastlake Development Company
App1icant (or authorized representative)
By;
By;
Dated:
~021"""93(1td.I020.93)(Rcf.I022.93)
PIB" 10
'.
TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Slatcmcnt of disclosure of cenain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which
will require cliscretiOna1)' action on the pan of the City Council, Planning Commission. and all other official bodies.
The following information must be disclosed:
J, Ust the aames of all persons have a financial interest in the contract. i.e.. contractor. IUbcontractor.
DWerial supplier. '
F.a~tlake Development Company
2. If any penon identified pumwI! 10 (1) above is a corporation or partnership. list the IWIIeS of all
individuais ownin& more than JO" of the share: in the corporaIion or ownin& any partnership interest in
the partnership.
.,. r.: 'Rn~wp 11
3. Jf any person identified pursuant to (I) above is DOn-profit organization or a ttust, list the IWIIeS of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or UUSIee of the UUSt.
Nn
4. Have you had more than $250 wonh of business transacted with any member of the City staff. Boards,
Commissions. Committees and Council within the past twelve months?
No
S. Please identify each and eveI)' person, including any agents. employees. consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Boh Santos. Kent Aden. Bruce Sloan, Katy Wright
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate. contributed more than $1,000 10 a Council
member in the current or preceding election period? Yes [ ] No pc ] If yes, IIate wbicl1 Council
member(s): .
........ tleflllld a: "Ally iadjvidua1. firm. ~.joinl_",. aID ' . a.1IOCiII club. fnIomoJ 011'.' ~ D.~. .......
...... ....ivcr.lyIIdicaIo. dais IIId III)' odic, _. dIy IIId _. dIy. _....'P"';,y. dIsIricI orodlCr poIiIicIllDbdiYioloD, or 18)' odIc'_
.. ~:-Ma acIia& u. anit..
(N01E: _ ....""-o'_a _ry)
Date:
~.1f::t
Bruce Sloan, proJec Manager
Eastlake Development COmpany
Print or type !WIle of contractor/applicant
WPr".J:.\N~J:'\"I"'''''''''''r.\~Deft'Ift'lI'' II~"_' ........_...._. ............
'I,
YS-S"fl
Case No. :Z:~ -q'-l-I"t
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMENT SHEETS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
I. Draina!!e
D.
~~!q4-
A. 1. the project site within a flood plain? foJo.
If so, state which FEMA FIoodway Frequency Boundary. ~A.
B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? 6(..0~~.&' I="I.d1/
~ ~HM~.AJ.JD CITY !1t1:JeM..~_P ~ve'!~t;, ~SrI!!M
C. Are they adequate to serve the project? IJD.
If not, please explain briefly. .P2elr,::'/..- ~ IF"lG 7'>DA..,&J Ar.c: IMP~E:.rrs W,U-
J?l! I2Eqv"r:r.::t WIlliN. b~/~~...rr- JI"Y./J JJX:_
D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities? iFI ~/''''A 'PU
~AA1'//VoJ. r..De"~ ~&.:%:. ~/Yr:JJ L'1!!H!I'r'!:'~ AND ~L.r r,J?~.&'"
I '
E, Are they adequate to serve the project? NO.
If not, please explain briefly. 'IlF/.Ii'!:Jl.JAt.. IM~o/...~e.1"T'1t:. ~y -- AI€"'-~/Il."
-
IN -rHt. ~-r: CAtvVOI-J AIJl:> CAI_I ~~It:.. B451/\/"- AS ~"I!l".,p~
rYL..f..lO' .
1ransportation AIJ NA~'1'" -ro "n1~ 7f2,I.Ff#IG srtJD'I Fip.. ~ 5f.fr1A~ (;~
SPA f;.1R,WfU-fJli ~(JfPf#D(Y<y. INc4g'l-sE. II-l rr;;.wlt:. C6i r;AAT'b1.t R1lM
A. What roads provide primary access to the project? f5X$1~
~
B. What is the estimated number of one-way auto nips to be generated by the project (per day)?~)'
C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T,) volumes on the.primary access roads before and
after project completion?
Street Name Before Afrtr
Do any of these volumes exceed the City's Level-of-Service (L.O.s.) "C. design ADT
volume? If yes, please specify,
Plie2
wpc:r.~C\n0REDl10n93 (aoI. 1021.93) (lei. IOJ).93)
Ys-~,
Case No. TC;-Q4-{q
H the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly.
. D. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project'?
H not, please explain briefly,
E. Would the project create unacceptable Levels of Service (LOS) at intersections adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site'?
H so. identify: Location
Cumulative L.O.S.
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program'? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle nips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
nips). H yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be required. In this case the TIA will
have to demonsttate that the project will not create an unmitigatable adverse impact, or that
all related ttaffic impacts are not mitigated to I level of non-significance.
Yes No
The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not required.
G. Is ttaffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from implementation of
the proposed project'? Yes No
H yes. please describe.
H, Is the project co~~istent with the criteria established in the City's Transponation Phasing Plan,
General Plan Traffic Element, and all other pertinent traffic studies' Please merence any
other traffic impact studies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the proposed
project.
I.
J.
Is a ttaffic study required'?
Is there any dedication required'?
H so, please specify.
Yes
No
wpc:J'~on93 (Rof.I02U3)(Rof. 10:10.93)
Pap 3
YS-9rl
Case No. I$ ..q&'/--<'t
K. Is there any street widening Jequired?
If so. please 5J'ecify.
L. Are there any other street improvements required?
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary improvements.
M. Will the project and related public improvements provide satisfactory traffic service for
existing conditions and future buildout General Plan conditions? (please provide I ~rief
explanation).
m,
Soils
IV,
A. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? IJ N K/.Jow,J .
B. If yes, specify these conditions. 1:/.,/4. .
C. Is a Soils Report necessary? y~~ E)((s-nlolr... 5Dllb tZ.~T'S MlJS"-~ 1J~"71!:D
~t>/OR.. AMEfN~ ~ (1)J4Vr:>e "'T'1rE ~
Land Fonn N../A . 'PI2oR>$'P 'TZ> ~ A~ 7?>"1"HE E.Klsr/~,
~EP ~PA .
A. What is the average natural slope of the site?
B, What is the maximum natural slope of the site?
v.
Noise
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that
a noise analysis be Jequired of the applicant? (JIJ/U.I/)IAh..I. Af.J. AI:..U::'Llhl.A~'r -r7> TUEE. SpA;-
~/~ .Nolse ~YSIS Wle.{,. Bt:.- ~(RZ!P .
VL Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day?
Solid 2.3w-.::o PIJOJJ~ Ao'J? DAY I"JIIE/L 'f'U.€. ~(<finAl~A^^,,--~c;;'PA
Uquid~~.2H04l/1~6 ~An1rY(!1~.;J.!5 eDV~){W~"fUr; 5i(1~~A~ta'.>~.
..
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from die liIe?
I~" All:, S~~ L.ul-s;;:. IJoJ -n;,~~".#!IIE. ~IYn,.j ImA'I J.-Avc::4!; t:b4n AAI~ .A 12t( W~ ~
:"AJ.J'f. IAl t:~lLe F'AP""""A'I (IY-/~ ~:"'1fiM ~r-; (U/TV.U-IIj'Au.. ~~ JA/JI ( ~
'Ii
~ ~ equate to s~ f.l~~ no, please explain) ,",0. ~~ se~~
~ \\~ ot: -nf€. "'ft;J ~...~. RI ~I'.>kl. WIL.L. 9.e O~ ,,~u-rv A-~ HZ- Relr.a2. -rn tj&:..Je-'{/V._
II. ;;;:::: 1\ ..
dJ 7\"J 15v11J""r>i IT" 1".llllVr:>rrr~f/;.. AMI!W~= JorC. TZ> "1SIE 1"" r: /!.tUrP#I t!J.,t./vlOAl &l6ftJ
~ pLtAfJ ~p ~ ~ (Jp~iI&V SE.~ ~N Pu"J Wru- SI!!: ~UIP&b.
wpc",~022.93 ....IO%U3) (Rot 1020.93) Paae"
Ys..gr I
CaseNo.~
VD. National Pol1utant Discharl!e Elimination System CNPDES) Stormwater Reauirements
Will the applicant be required to fue a Notice of Intent with the Stale Water Resources Control Board
for coverage WIder an NPDES Stormwater Permit? YES.
. If yes, specify which NPDES permit(s) ~d explain why an NPDES pennit is Rquired. AM IJ.~
,'WpM/or p->, ~u""~2 "D(~J.AD~~~ J66r>r..lA'f'7?!:'D WtT'tl C>>&..I~V:""D~
!-~"""II""'IIE."'_ A ~.I""- f~ P~IJtl1t::h s~r~u~~ ~~ r:=/~1!!!- AJI'~
W,LI ~ 7;J1~J2lb::::n ~ 7ls:/'-M~~ nP~~ ~/rPAAEA..""-/~
'JAItr OF.4 LAP..f..~(;J t!DAAAAnAl 'CI' A I..l ~ ~Ve:J.N:t...Aa..n- dl. ~, ~ .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be Rquired for the proposed project?
'J( Yes No
Additional comments J.J.oJJ.~ .
VD. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential advene impacts, mitigation measures. or other
issues. ~e. APPI...'t:.6..../r ~ ~~E!!::> ItSSIF<5f:..'':' n- D~IGr F,.lA#"+.lt:
Foi2- ;>,.JA/ /e IAA&>R.t>"'~M'..J7T,
ci/J f 9.f
. . I
Date
Pqe5
WI'C:F:~on93 (1.01.11121.93) (W. 1020.93)
.
Case No. 1 S .(14 1'1
FIRE DEPARTMENT
A, What is the distance to the nearest fire station'? .6!!!! wbat is the Fire Department'. estimated
rcactiontimc?~O st. ~ (:~0'\'\1"'\. f1-o~ion +iVV"\tJ
-
:
B. Will the Fue Department be able to provide an ..sequate level of fR procection for the
proposed facility without an increase in equipment or pmonnel'? 'I of'..s.
c. Remarks ~) CA.) t'
~' ~~fj/U>PLY
F' Marshal
O//QO/(1'f
Date
- .
~02:l."..,.III:lln)(IoI.10>>.")
..... 15
.
.
Case No. --l5-,!'-I-1G]
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
A. Is project subject to Parks and Recreation Threshold n:quiremenlS'1 lji:S.
If not, please explain,
How many acres of parkland are oecessary to serve the proposed project'1
'\0 ~ ~);!1? .,..) .::;~ ~pi\'4OC c.."ZIi12\"\,!I..
Ale existing neighbOIbood and community parks near the project adequate to aerve the
population increase resuhing from this project?
Neighborhood ~
Community Parks tJ O.
If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed IS pan of the project adequate
to serve the population increase?
Neighborhood ,,\"!.~
Community Parks \' ~ .
To meet City n:quirements, w,i11lpplicant be n:quired to:
Provide land? 'r\~'S
v..
Pay a fee? ,'" .
Remarks:
'B.
c.
D.
E,
F.
t-F'. ~\~
Parks and Recreation Director or RepresentaDve
"2. ~ . 't'l--
Dare
WI'C:f,~D22." ~.lmU))~.ID2U))
'.7
.
Case No. !S-Q'HCj
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A,
Does the project affect native plant communities?
If so, please identify which communities.
{tV
Will the project require native planting? (please describe) _\I\ht ~ ~ .
B. Please identify any important or highly visib1e hil1sides on or adjacent to Ihe project.
~
Who< """'Pml """..... (if ",y) wID '" ""'"'" .. """ ......., ~
~~~~~JIt~ ~~14~AT
C. Of the total area to be developed, how much, and which ueas are ex~ to be replanted
and require supplemental watering? (Please describe).
E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project? ~
.
~
WI'C~D2:U)U.III2"'))U.laI.lI3)
...,
t
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18, 1994
I
I
;
!
,
!
~
, "
l--~'~
~~'
SUBJECT:
..
, ' .
~.n Larson, Building 6 Housing:
~ohn Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard RUdolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dec , EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department .
Harty Schmidt, Parks , Recreation
Crime Prevention, police Department (H.J. Diosdado)
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary school District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom silva (IS' EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Other
Doug Reid
Environmental section
Application for Initial Study (IS- 94-1WFA-~/DO 060 J
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DO )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP J
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----1
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DO- )
!l'he Project consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake GreenS to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and
by 02-01-94 .
;j C-~~/;- c2 -rj,~~-
~. 4<<~ I. ZAJ.
CODIIDents:
d to me any cODIIDents you have
ROUTING FORM
DATE: January 18, 1994
TO: Xen Larson, Building << Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Clitt Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Asst City Attorney (Dratt Neg Dec << EIR)
Carol GOVe, Fire Department '
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
~rr.nt Plann1.ngf -
-Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, city Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
other:
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (15- 94-lWFA-~/DQ 060 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-____/FB-____/DQ )
Review of a Dratt EIR (EIR-_/FB-____/DP)
Review ot Environmental Review Record (FC-____ERR-_)
Review ot Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
!l'he Project consists ot: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existing boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22,7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and torward to me any comments you have
by 02-01-94
COJIIJDents: rf-t=t'f u~<,. ~ t.bL. Dou....Q.M&.a...P..
, ~J1 & t ~'C.....~ ~ ~CL.-( fp..,('~ -0 ~~
~ "l1 clu "'~ ~~'"
.
ROUTING FORM
\
DATE: January 18, 1994
'1'0: Xen Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Asst City Attorney (Draft Neg Dee & EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
crime Prevention, police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
Current Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
~1Iff8ff~-'eny-ultd6u6_ An.1Iit.ofCt 1
~ob Lei ter, Planning 2>iritctor-"'"
Chula vista Elementary school District, Xate Shurson
~ Sweetwater Union H,S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Dratt EIR - It annexation is involved)
other
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental Section
SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (15- 94-lWFA-~/DQ 050 )
Checkprint Draft E1R (20 days) (E1R-____/FB-____/DQ )
Review of a Draft E1R (E1R-_/FB-____/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-____ERR-____J
Review of Dratt Neg Dec (15- /FA- /DQ- J
The Project consists of: An amendment to the EastLake Greens General
Development Plan and Sectional Area Plan which would result in:
1. The transfer of units within the existin9 boundaries of East
Lake Greens to refine densities with no net increase in the
existing proposal density and
2. The addition of 22.7 acres to EastLake Greens development with
an additional 97 dwelling units.
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 02-01-94
COlDIDents:
~ ;of ~~~
CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
~ ~ ~
- --
DATE: t--'-~ ~ /qq4
TO: ~R..~d, ~I!--< P~nnv-........
VIA: ~~.7~,-,,4nv, Utl/.
FROM: 'y11~~ ~ r SC-f5
PROJECT: J;':::>. '14-/9 Q~A, 'f,OoAfW.-L-gJ~~~
?JpA-\-
_ The Crime Prevention lJnit does not have any comments regarding this project at this time.
_ Information on the project, or within the plans, does not provide enough detail to permit
crime prevention analysis.
.25L.- Please forward the following information to the Crime Prevention Unit when available.
~ Elevations
Floor Plans
L Landscape and Lighting Plans
...XL. Site Development Plans
Comments: f?-1 Yf.,_L (fY,f..:.Ui:t /r~L V AP./,H; /W Cnnmp!~'
re_i-P7Ld Y-/J y'.f~ G~~ .p~-" t2./ cJUN'f:?i""PW<1: >4)
~ :c 6., 'l:nA.J WZtd-v'J Yzf.4/ t1--'n~_
'0".:t~
V' ' '
;/11
(10.. {i t -I-- /hp, ,
..
~]r.( fir ;11 ~ " (If I.A.:;/l.
cc: Brookover, SCA
CP'IED a-;., Fcnn
~~3
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
FebruaJ}' 1, 1994
FROM:
Doug Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
Duane E. Bazze~
Principal Planner
TO:
SUBJECT:
Initial Study for EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment (IS-94-19)
The Advance Planning Division appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposed
project identified above, From an environmental analysis standpoint it appears that the
EastLake Greens EIR and Addendum sufficiently addressed the proposed density transfers
within EastLake Greens. The proposed transfer of units are occurring under the umbrella
of the originally-approved EastLake Greens SPA and Tentative Map (2,774 units), therefore,
unless there are significant shifts in unit locations it would appear that the original EIR
adequately addresses the transfers.
It should not be forgotten, however, that as a condition of approval of a recent GP
amendment to Parcel 26 of the Greens (GPA-93-04), the City Council re-enacted the
affordable, housing requirement for the Greens (deferred with the Tentative Map approval)
and directed staff to work with a task force to develop recommendations by July of this year
on how to handle the low and moderate income housing within this project. This direction
from Council included the consideration of any density transfers necessary to achieve the
housing requirement. It does not appear that the proposed density transfers are significant
enough to impact the task force efforts, but nevertheless, these efforts should be considered
prior to approving any SPA amendment.
The 97 units to be annexed and added to the Greens have only been analyzed at a General
Plan level (within the Otay Ranch Program EIR) and not at the detail necessary with a GDP
and/or SPA This needs to be taken into consideration when analyzing potential
environmental impacts. Additionally, project-level analysis needs to be coordiDated with the
Community Planning Division of the plRnning Department (Otay Ranch SPA Team) on the
issue of land use and design interface with East Orange Avenue and efforts on the adjacent
Otay Ranch.
cc: Ken Lee
Steve Griffin
Amy Wolfe
c""'\t.NI!M)
MEMORANDUM
(
February 1, 1994
File # YS-s91
SUBJECT :
Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director~~
ci ty Engineer ~
Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Enginee~
Eastlake Greens General Development and Sectional Area
Plans Amendment
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
In response to your concern regarding our transportation comment in
the subject initial study application, the following paragraph
should be added to Section VII of the application,
Previous traffic studies have shown that the circulation
system plan prior to the construction of SR12s does not
have sufficient capacity to absorb additional trips
beyond those trips accounted for in the approved maps
including the approved Eastlake Greens, Thus the
Eastlake Greens proposed expanded development project
will have to be limited to the number of trips identified
in the approved project EIR traffic study, However, the
applicant may wish to perform a supplemental traffic
study to examine possibilities of expanding the City's
circulation system (e.i. extension of E, Orange Avenue
between I-80S and Eastlake Greens) to provide the needed
capacity, A reference to the City's interim SR-12s
financial study (HNTB study) and improvement scheduling
are a critical element of the study.
ZAO:rb
cc: Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
(' I \HOMI\INQINSIR\TRAPPIC\PLKMBND. DO)
MEMORANDUM
February 21, 1994
File # YS-551
SUBJECT:
Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator ,
Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/" Y
City Engineer r
Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engme<:'.:X / '
,.;,~ I't..., .:,1
Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment Traffic Study (IS-93~ ~
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
I have reviewed the attached traffic impact report by Urban Systems dated February 18, 1994
and fmd it to be acceptable. The new trips from the added 97 units to the Eastlake Greens
approved units of 2774 have no significant impact on the City's circulation system.
ZAO:dv
Attachment
(F:\HOME'J!NGINEER\1RAI'FIC\11U'STIJDY ZAO
URBAN SYSTEMS A...JSOCIATES, INC.
~. TAAfflC_. _. PrtO.S:r~
CONstA. rANTS TO INDUSTRY ANO GoVEllMlEWT
.- ~, --
.... ::"-..:,, ;::-"
". -y :::.- :~;";'_:.....:". -....;:':-
;-).~ :'t.: -=_::. "':-; ::[;';'7'
1594 fES 22 All. 9: 4S
February 18, 1994
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
City TraffIC Engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Hal:
Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Eastlake Development to
evaluate possible impacts from the development of additional dwelling units in the Eastlake
Greens GDP/SPA Amendment. The Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment proposes an
increase of 97 dwelling units from 2,774 DU to 2,871 DU.
Proiect Trip Generation
The development of 97 additional dwelling units will result in the following peak hour and daily
trip generation,
NIo PEAK PM PEAK
USE INTENSITY GENERATION N:JT
AATE NIo" NIo IN:OUT IN:OUT PM" PM IN:OUT IN:OUT
SPUT SPUT
SFDU 1700 1~ 170 '" 7S 2:S 18:82 10'11> 17 7:3 es:28
As can be observed, the 97 additional units will result In 97 PM peak hour trips. Of the 97 PM
peak hour trips, 68 are inbound and 29 outbound to the project, The AM peak would have 78
additional peak hour trips with 16 Inbound and 62 outbound during the peak.
Previous TraffIC Study Assumptions
A traffic study for KaIser Hospital (Eastlake I SPA Amendment by JHK AssocIates) was
completed on ADril 20. 1992. The KaIser Hospital traffic study represents the most recent
analysis of interim conditions for eastern Chula Vista (east of 1-805). The analysis for Interim
conditions assumed the "approved projects" level of development for It's interim analysis. The
"approved project" level of development was based on the Final Eastern Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan Update prepared by Wildan Associates (1/91).
001118 VLGCNTII17
~."o ,..,...... l1'li.. liMn ,~""' lflli . ,'to{ DIEGO. Cf 92123-1573 . (619) 560-<1911 . FAZ (6:9) 560-9734
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
February 18, 1994
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
(
In the final report for Kaiser Hospital dated April 20, 1992, (page 41), the approved project
development scenario will result in approximately 193,230 additional dally trips in Eastem Chula
Vista. The analysis Included trips generated by 2,774 units In the Eastlake Greens project.
Using the "approved projects" condition as the b9Se, Impacts from the KaIser Hospital were
evaluated. Attachment 1 shows the NIIIPM peak hour Intersection tevel of service from the
Kaiser Hospital traffic analysis.
h shown In Attachment 1, all Intersections are forecasted to operate at a level of service "D"
or better. Kaiser Hospital Impacts to the Intersection of Otay Lakes at Eastlake Parkway (the
critical Intersection for the Kaiser Project) for the NIIIPM peak results In a level of service "C"
to "D". Intersection delay was 5.2 seconds for the NIl peak and 5,4 seconds In the PM peak
at this location. The Increased delay at this location was due to more than 14,000 daily trips
from the Kaiser project being added to the base conditions.
The Kaiser analysis concludes that the Intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway is 25.8 seconds In the NIl peak and 29.8 in the PM peak which translates to a level
of service D. It should be noted that the Intersection delay at Otay Lakes Road and Eastlake
Parkway could be increased as much as 10 seconds and still remain at a level of service "D".
~PA Amendment lmoacts
In order to determine possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment, project traffic was
added to the Intersection analysis discussed above. All other assumotions for the computer
Intersection analysis remained the same. h shown on Attachment 2, the resulting level of
service Including project traffic remained "D" for both the NIl and PM peak. A comparison of
Attachment 1 and 2 shows that with project traffic the Intersection delay Increased only 1.5
seconds in the NIl peak and 2.1 seconds In the PM peak. This clearly Indicates that the Spa
Amendment for interim (worst case) conditions is not likely to create Impacts which would require
mitigation or change the level of service at Eastlake Parkway and Otay Lakes Road.
In addition, possible Impacts from the proposed SPA amendment were analyzed for the
Intersection of Eastlake Parkway and Fenton Street. ,Base conditions for the Intersection
analysis were obtained from the Scripps Clinic TraffIC analysis dated March 30. 1993. For the
base conditions, signal timing was optimized which resulting In a level of service "D" for the P.M,
peak or an Intersection delay of 36.7 seconds (see Attachment 3).
Project traffic was then added to the base conditions. All other assumptions for the computer
Intersection analysis remained the same. As shown on Attachment 3, the resulting level of
service Including project traffic remained "D". Intersection delay changed only 0,4 seconds to
37.1. This clearly shows that the SPA amendment for Interim conditions Is not likely to create
Impacts which would require mitigation. Id build out or with an Interim 125 or with an Orange
Avenue connection, Spa Amendment Impacts would be even smaller because there would be
multiple access routes.
1101..
1II.BCN'BII7
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
February 18, 1994
Urban Systems Associates, Inc.
I.
Based on the information discussed above, Impacts from the development of 97 additional units
appear to have minimal impacts on the circulation system. We therefor suggest that no further
traffic analysis is necessary.
Please call us if you have any questions regarding the analysis discussed above.
.
APSfTRS:vks
Attachments
cc: Bruce Sloan
Cliff Swanson
Doug Reid
1101l1li VLGCNTII17
r
en
Ci5
>-
...J
<
Z
<C
a:::
~
o
::s:
~-'
<C<c
WI-
c.._
zg;
_00
I-I-:I:
~()a:::
~ww
iSenen
<a:::_
I-W<C
I-I-~
<z~
-a:::
-0
~LL.
....
I
a:::
en
w
a:::
D..
--
~
[t
W
I-
Z
-
z!
00
e=
i~
o~
ul
t-
~...
0..
..<
"'::e
.. f5::E
~ VJ~
:II ~!j
. ..z
.. ...<
g~
.....
::i~
~~
!E
U
~
z!
00
e=
~~
8~
~!
0"
..<
"':1
,!I ~::e
w ~a
:I ot!
. ..z
.. ..<
g~
,l'
j;\~
~~
!5
i!
;; '1111'111
1: ii!.cr:a:.~".
t 11111 !!!!111!! !I I !!III
iiiii!!!!!!! !}}}}}}}fl II I Iliii ~ N
J
. \
11 ~-
l i~ QaVQuuQCQUU UUUC.CQU.. .0 0 oc_ooo
Ii ~.J
-1 :~
.. " -
~ !~= ~~~~~~~~~~a ~~~~~~~~~~ ill. ~ q~~~~~
.."~. ~..~~~o.~o ~o~..~-o.. ~. -~-~-~
e--. "~"~_N~~NN _NNN_"~N__ N ~ ~ _~.~N
; tQ 1)
p'! =
ti\ QQucuuQQQUU uuuo_oVU.. .u . _<_cov
i ;..J
- -
.. "1
~! = ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~.
t;~ A~~~SR~~~R~ S~R~~~R~~~ .~ . .~=~~R
.. .
..o~
.! :
J J
! : J I~ JI ~
; !!i!I!!J~JI~!I!! ~!I!1 fiI'I!Vr!!!
~ij=i~ij~ji!3~Ei~ijl i~~Ej i~ ~ !!iij~
=il~g~~~~~g~!~=i!~!lgI~!!JJiJ!jai!
_"~.~~~_.~=cl ~=~=~d~~~R ~~ ~ ~~~~~
.
.
11 !;;
t ~~ _uuuU...U-O uuuo-vu-u. -Q C c<_uuu
II j.J
~~~~:~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ 1]]. ~ ~~~~~~
~.. .~~_~~_.~~~ ~~~~~.~.._ ~ ~ ~~_O~~
~e~: ___N______~ _N_N ----- N N " _N__
i~" t
: -
t~\ .uuuU...U-C UUf.,u:..uu.u. . u . <_uuu
I ~.J
- :
~~~:1 ~-~~~qq~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ .~ . .~~~~~
t~~ %~="===%~~~ c~=~~e=~== ~ ~=R=~
e" .
~A 1:
: .
i I J
I J 1<1111 I
; uldnJ~JI~ IUI ~dH IU'IIIIU!
!~ai~ijij~i!~~II~ijl' il~i~ 1 &e< ~!I
1~ljg~ii!!g!<!~i!!!lgr!I!JJj!!jl~!
" I ]!]!]!]
, ~ !!!!!lllllll 1111111!11 I' I II!!!
JI!I!!!!!!!! il}}}}}}gg !t I !!ftl
_"~.~.~_.2=~ =~=~~=:2~R ~~ ~ ~~~~g
.
"''0 -6 U!!
.. .-="
Ii: 8 _ '=-
:! ~e~
c !o,s
g1 ! i ~
h 1'11-
it ~~~
J HU
t11 J54
'" il 'H'i
t j__ hi~
. g ......."
i ~ 1Ili ~
~ Ii t~ll
-8 l~ ~2gi
e....5 .. ill';
~ ';I R U ~
1 d1 ~.~t
II 11;0 ~f.Gi Ii
i t~] ~~!. 1
i {~'5 Ute :
~ ~a] ~EH ~
:t
"
J
,.. tH
U in
~1 ! f ~
J M 11-
.8t ..'
I} !!~
tl1 hU
'" 11 uu
i... ~ll
{Jt Hi.
!:! {1 I'H'I
i,,! Ji~1
t U .~!t
a "0 ~tU
t ~d fl~.1
i hi !~h
..:.... .
I
~
~~~
~ii ~
il Ct)
I~ ~
i II i
J ~::s
.-I <~
.. t..
.. _01
I ill
~
~
~
G
m
~
~
~
I::!
\I)
~
~
..
r
a:
o
u.
00
00
>-
-I
ct
ZI-
cto
zw
03
I-a:
oQ..
NW
t-Cf.)C
za:w
~wCf.)
:1:1-0
~ZQ..
1:-.0
<lOa:
C\lQ..
.....
'w
a::L
001-
w
a:
Q..
-
~
c:
W
t-
~
....
~~~c::c::c::
III",,""I'\I"N
IQ~"'''''''''''''
~"''''D:a::
000000
III":";":";":":
...................
I
I
"
E
~
u
......,;
..
..
!:
!
.........
.....WlIt'III'I
':cO:':";.n
0...-11'\1"""
...
~'"
...-,..,.......
"
,
,
,
,
0000001
.....1 V)
C====::::::lrna
,,,..
I~
..:I.......: IC'"
"&
~
tl3J:1oooo
a~:r.
..:1..:1..... 0: lit. .e'"
..
..
..
~c::c::c:c:c::
III"''''"''''''"
toI...............oo4
IO"'C"O
caco.......
~"N
~
000000
ID";":":":";":
(I)..................
w.. ..,1: III:
000000
III":";":":";":
lIE............""
..
E
E 2
I!i U
I
......,;
..
:;
.;
.1
II
111,""","0
M....o-
~N.
~
!;i!OU
I
,
,
,
00001
1t'I1t'I1I'I1tI1
I
,
,
,
,
OOOOI~
..CJI.....
... .1
00001....
i~
i...
,
:i!E
II
..
0.0000 "',.,
1.:'" f
B~&&.z
....
0000
>....0000
=.... . . . .
_N"'f\lN
~ 0000
0_0000
... . . . .
a:_oooo
U
&elIDIIHEI
~:a:ZCfJ
..
..
!:
!
..........
"1D.e&
..:1:......00
0..-1""'......
...
Ii",
0._......,..""
..
i~....
0000
~_oooo
=_. .. .
_"'1'\1""
I
,
,
IU 00001
Q_OOOOI
~. .. . 0'
_00001
,
,
,
,
,
uu:
C.
.,
~&
~
t~ .eM
i5
..
N
(lQIMMt(
....
U..
t
....
~
,..
&
..
!;Uf!;r:"fi5~
.. .. !:!..
z IIf.I "...
....
....
N
1)CIoCH
&
~
,..
&
..
~~L1f~iSt:fe~
:I Ii tJ~
o.
. ,
C"
~..
~
I
E'i' MM
ij&
~
N
~:::"OCM
U..
t
....
~
,..
f
..
....
....
N
IMMK
f
,
,
OCI
. .,
...,
N ,
,
,
I
1
!;r:U!;r:"fi5~i
..:J,
= = :=1
~
'"
f
..
CC
CC
CC
...
N
00
..
00
...
~
00
00
00
N.
~
C:C:
N.
~
00
...
~
..
S
"
t
..
"
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
iE
. ..
:111 U
In : ~ ~
~ : t; +
to4 : L1 C
g . - ~
~ I~ ~ ~ --------
.. . ~ ... ..
.. Cflt,7Il!itl)
B. li:JoC ::1tI..o
N :...f3~=A.a:I 11 ~::::=:
M .. oCr: II) I 0. I:
:i! :t8g:;;!:~ :J
~t::::.: ':~!f:~~o
;;~:~: . I M..N
~...... . . . . . I
i:Q::;:ti~::::: =OON..O
U>o. &o<>of-< . .~ I Ilol.. O>D
Zi. tl)E-ttn .. I ....N.,.
.. p: ><.. I
.., ..I.:I,,:,J~I.:IE'
=. :~IoJ~!C~ol ~= a::
Men.. ....~OCQrotJ I o.:It-ota::
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
iE
...
.
.. i ~
! : ~ +
ti : - !
i ~i B a
Ii H\ t; .
.. . ~ ... II
. ....a..
c... ..c . 1tI...... 0
II . 0:"" .. ~"~CN
".",,11:1,(0010. ,..Ift...
~ :~~gS~~t
ftt: : : : : :: ir::::::o
..~... . . . . . M""....
"" .. o. ...
.. 1-1 . . . . .
- 0:' ".. '. . . .
li .. liS 0. . . . .
Zi": ~I:t : :t
.. .....15
In .. ~..:i~1011
:: : 5: <C~!
""'....~~c..
,
000000 t
. . . . .. D') 0000 I
I::::::::::::::::: ItJB ItIInItlVlI
t"Do I
12 I
,IJ ,
...:.......... toC" 0000'.
'''":; ~o:cr:cr:li
'I ooOOtl-l
0000001 t~
......1 I
ID"NNftf'lNI t
~""'""'""'""'""'""': =~ooool.1
: IS!:'" i ~f
~_....*<<I~ID 1ft
I ..
----""--1 aloooo ""7
=~:~o I" f
....... t
,
i
,
,
I
,
..
t S.oUUUClU...c::aCOtICI
!;i!Ou!;nIi:B~i!j
.. .. "a,t:
.. 10 u...,D
11D....ooI.................t.
, a...........
... ....00.............
10 f'lft...N........"'......
~~i~"
00'
,
.N".In",""ItIf"o",1tI
u..o...ItI...."'....
_..001......0......"...0...
U . . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000
"
t
" .
e
'N
..
~
N
.
":
N
N
N
N
N
N
..
WSCIIUCIICIIOUWCClUO
U
~
V)>o.,...o",,,,.."""fOt'"
..a-';.n..;a:';-';.n..;a:..;ro:
i"N~NNN~.~NNN
0..""'11'1.."''''.....''''''
uo..:>""tn...r.~o..:>O"\O"\
_~.............r........0"\.......V'I
o . . . . . . . . . . .
00000000000
.....V'lI"'I""....fOt"''''''t'o
u..V'I.""'...,......,N...1"'I
,"'......t'o...,.....""'t'oo
~ . . . . . . . . . . .
0000000000'"
~
w~..a:~..."'~I!':..1"'"
~
:I
~
!:
oc
cc
..
s
u
..
..
..
"
"
cc
e.
CC
..
~
..
a..
" .
.
oN
..
~
":
..
N
..
..
N
co
N.
~
.0
...
co
..
~
"1JI..lJIfOt~."'.PI
Uo,.....",.....tn......1"1'"
_"."'",."'IJI..tn"'PlI
;............ .1
000000000001
,
,
,
~ i!i
101~''.~''.W=..1..,,,lg
3 i..
: 15
, ...
: ~
, ..
:I
~
~
1
,
,
,
,
1
'"
,
"
,
,..
I S
~
..
..
C
.
U
.-
..
:c-
o
.
i
~
..
~
N
I
..
.
~
!
..
..
~
~
..
15
~
..
u
"
I
..
S
N
..
~
.
..
..
c
.
u
-
..
i
i
~
":
..
N
.
..
.
..
I!.
..
..
"'"
~
~
S5
G
~
~
~
~
~
~
CI)
~
~
~
~
Ct;)
~
m
::5
.
.
..
"~:"~
t
(
t-
o
W
..,
o
0::
D..
o
W
C/)
o
D..t-
OUJ
O::UJ
D..o::
wt-
:Len
t-z
0::0
ot-
u.Z
W
C/)U-
'" Ci5 t-
I- >- <
Z.J
~<( >-
:I:z <(
~<( ~
I- Z ::c:
<00::
-<(
bD..
ww
c/)::c:
0::<
w.J
t-t-
zen
-<(
ij)w
C\I
~
I
W
0::
D..
.....
~
Ct
W
t-
Z
-
~~~'=:~~
..,..,..,..,..........
.,..................
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. 000000
... ~ ' , , , . ,
Ei :::::::::::::::
: ~ ...
i 1:1 ~~~~~
. """ 000000
. .,. , , , , .
: e: I::::::::::::
: 01
. . ,
. ..0
. 0
. .,
. .
. ..,
: E ~ I
. : 0. fj I
.. ."' ., I
ti i~ ~i~-~~~~--
o :~ I ~I ..,..~,..O
15 . _., '110........
.. . . t;: + 1 ..
~ : Ii; ...'" loll
. ..~a..'
Ci . lie ,"" ......,..0
.. . ~a:Z'" 1I11II:z.CJ'I~.
.. . IaJC.-Io. I ~ ,..rI.-I
104 . :10 I .. I E
~ :..S~Sf~l::s
~t: :'.:. ::~I:;::::o
;2:! :: I ......
w.... ' , . . "
_". ~1Il ' . . , I
'.I: . 0.,.., I ........ 0 0
u.... .....' 'S' 101.........
"i. .,fooll') ,,' .-I.
.I!I: ...,. ,
... . ,.hC,.)WWX: I
: : ~~~!C~:I::
..... "'~CCifoo8, !a;t~
~,,,u....~
..:a~...
000000
..,.' ,
.,..,..,..,..,..,..
101..................
000000
, , . , , ,
.,..,..,..,..,..,..
11/1..................
,
,
,
,
.. " ,
,
'"
,
, .
,
,..
is
o
o
,
-: I
.. '"
.. ,..
,..
, .
. 0
o
o.
,
I ' U
~c...o...c..o ~1.SUUD..U.D.ucl~
.o.afoo.""..3foo.""e 0 U '
,~
..3' =- .-
= = IB~:ei i
I....orl,..,.o..-I...... .
...."!i..;r:.:.:..;o";";";'; "U'
'OW,.....~ID,.....~......f'I .
~~I~c ~
oo,~
't
i~
,
DO'
tcKK ..,
".,
~ ,
,
,
,
DO'
tete ,I
...,
,
,
,
,
DO'
.,
~.i
,
,
!3r:;t2!a~tfli~ !
..~,
15::
..
~
~
~
O.
.,
0=
~~
~
00
00
roro......
I~
~
..
..,
~E
t
....
....
......
':Cr:.:..;..;
~......ro"'rI
...
......
e=
.................
..
~
0..
II:
..
a oooe
............
..
E"" 1
oe'" 00001t!)
"'1 -:-:-:-:Ii
& ooool~
tl2.Qoooole'1'
2VJZ I~=
g= loe""
oCII I~
'"
1:100001l1l'i';'
"" : f
2~&....:z.1
". ,
,
,
,
00001
t;;C:':':':1
_...,..",,..1
o
,
,
II:! 00001
a_oOOOI
:!~oooo I
.. ,
,
,
,
,
=11::
..
,
=
~
....
~
IICICIOC
II:
::
..
"
..
S"
..
00
.;.;
~
~
~~
...
5..
".
~::
.
:
..
.;
.
DO
~.;
~
"'..-1...."'........
u.P'O.......,.....rt...P'O
....,..P'O......,...........,..,..
C' . , , , . . , . ,
0000000000
"
..
....,.ro.......,..,..
u~.ItI....,........
....0,...."',......."'0"'-
. ' , . , . , . , , .
0000000000
.
..
.
!
e !
1Q03...~.....:aI5,.:je::~
! IVI
. iE
I: 110 I'"
::
=
.
.
.
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
=, I ~ a.
~ .:a..:a....r: ..-~..~...
:!~ ...
. I" 000000 i
! I, I~:~::::=I ::::\'
: I ti
: to3O:'.... Ie.. 0000 I.
. ''''1: ...... II
: .', I' 00001..
::1 :: ~~~~~~I !t'
loti .""",,""1 Ii
.. I ........-1..1"4.-11 :I ,...
. ~I I If DODO 11:=1:
J ! I ~~... I !
;i ~!--------II IloOOOI'.~
I 51 1:::0 ..
: "": : .1 .. I a"
.Iii ..... . ",;:0....'
"I .~,!!" I I ..,
a g" !I:::O
. : ~!:"". ,,~.-I I 00001 E
~ :",tl=E~ i ~E~~~~I
It- . . . . .. ~c:;::=o I,' 1
=9:! : : : : : ...... I III 0000 I
Iii. ... . , . . . I g;;~ ~ ~ ~ I
~-&:t~:"::: ....~~O I 2_00001
.... III..... ..~ ","...PI C I
.. Vltotr:l . 'Q .... I I
~i:C~~M~~ I I
. . ...IIoJ.c...z I 1
:.:~=Ja~ ~~~I I 11:=:
~~: '" I
00 I S I
: a . . CI I
, . ,
, ~ ,"
00 I I
MI< ,. I I.
......1 t
... I I'"
I : S
, .. '
DO' a I
teteN .' I
..... 1 ... ~ .....
I ICI' . .; ro I.
~~I ~~ . ... 11
I s.UUO"U.D.ual~
~"tt~"t2!~!~ 1_
m =: II! i & ,..
1."'oPl....o........I~
1..4':":0":":';';':";'; 1....\1
o~.....ro......ro.....rol
00 0 I.
00 I ~ i:"
19 I'
I ......................1=
00 u.".....,.."'"ItIPlI
MIOCM ~~I v~~~~~~~~~~I.
M I 00000000001
It
6t'! .......ro".",.ol~
teN ., v........,...... la
_0"...."......0..'
.. I .0000000000 I
I I
00 I . I
..\ !> ' -
~.. I ;: I B
I =0.3...~.....a~..aI:!~
~Ut~~t2e~! ~ ! a
.. .. a' I .. ... 'I<
101 11 I... ~ ... . I...
~.:a..fool5
~~~~c:c:
an,,"''''''''''
.........-1...1"4...
i
I
..
..
~
.
~
'0.
, .,
'0=
,~~
~
P'Oro......
~
......
":c":":':':
~"''''P'OroP'O
..
I~
..
..,
tiE
t
M"
~
,..
II:
..
....
~I I
IIIUCK
II:
~
~
~
'>:)
~
m
~
~
~
~
II)
~
~
~
~
Ct)
~
~
~
I
e
..
MEMORANDUM
February 23, 1994
File Number YS 591
FROM:
Doug Reid, Environmental Review coor~i~~tor
Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer VVVVJ
TO:
SUBJECT:
Initial Study 94-019, EastLake Greens GDP & SPA Amendment
This is to clarify our comments (on sewers and drainage)
February 1, 1994 concerning the information provided
application for the subject Initial Study.
dated
in the
Our comments on drainage (Section I, A through E) noted that
project specific improvements would be required as development
occurs and further, that regional improvements in Salt Creek and
Poggi Canyon may be required as development occurs. This comment
was meant to convey that development of the overall General
Development Plan area would probably require construction of
regional level drainage improvements. Any additional development
which may occur as a result of this amendment may require greater
capacity in those facilities, but we believe that the added
capacity would be insignificant.
Our comments on Section VI, Waste Generation, noted that some
segments of the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer will be over capacity
at, or prior to, General Plan buildout conditions.
This comment addressed the fact that the EXISTING Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer lacks capacity to serve the buildout development. A
Development Impact Fee (DIF) is presently in place for gravity
basin development, and a Telegraph Canyon Pumped Basin DIF will be
in place very shortly, as will a Salt Creek Basin DIF.
The parallel and upgraded facilities provided for through the
collection of these fees will be adequate for the provision of
sewer service to all of the affected development areas for as long
as necessary.
The additional development which may result from the proposed
amendment may have a non-significant impact on one segment of the
sewer line. That impact would be that an upgrade required by the
overall development would increase by a minor degree with the added
development, No increase in the DIF would occur.
RLD: YS-S91
P:\HOMB\BNGINBBR\IS94-019
EXHIBIT A
t
DescriPtion of Work
Assessment District 94-1
The general description of work to be funded by Assessment District 94-1 consists of the following:
1. Street improvements consisting of grading, base, paving, gutter, sidewalk, street lighting and
landscaping within the following rights-of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L.F., Phase 1),
b, South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L.F" Phase 2).
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3).
2, Utilities and underground improvements consisting of potable water facilities, storm drain facilities,
sewer facilities, reclaimed water facilities, electric facilities, telephone facilities, gas facilities,
television facilities as appropriate by applicable state and federal statutes within the following rights-
of-way:
a, South Greensview Drive - from Clubhouse Drive to Unit 6 entrance (2,400 L,F., Phase 1).
b, South Greensview Drive - from Silverado Drive to Hunte Parkway (3,400 L,F., Phase 2),
c. South Greensview Drive - from Unit 6 entrance to Silverado Drive (1,920 L.F., Phase 3),
3, DIF funded street improvements consisting of grading, storm drain, base, paving, curb, gutter,
sidewalk, medians, streetlighting, landscaping and street monumentation within the following rights-
of-way:
a. Hunte Parkway _ from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive (2,300 L,F., Phase 2).
4. DIF funded street and underground improvements consisting of grading, and storm drain
improvements within the following rights-of-way: '
a, Hunte Parkway _ from South Greensview to Orange Avenue (1,270 L.F., Phase 2).
b. Orange Avenue _ from Hunte Parkway to the SDG&E easement (3,500 L.F., Phase 2).
,
Wl'C p:_~I.".94
ffi'-J.
~
~(":'O F! 1;lr~ Ru;nl
RICK ENGINEERlNG COMPANY
5;'11 Dkpo
I,
(;djr~H'ni;\ 9~110.~:.9~
\\'(;i..' NC"I,'iicl.- '-':: "("1
tt'l!~) ~91.0iOi
F.-\:'\. !t-J9J 191-41~5
, ,-.J
r- ,...., .,
1')'"),'
.:J .J~:
. -- -
February 7, 1994
Mr. Clifford Swanson
City of Chula Vista
276 Founh Avenue
Chula Vista. California 9J 912
RE: EASTLAKE GREENS - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND
SPA AMENDMENT (J-12347)
Dear Mr. Swanson:
This is to confirm that the stolm drainage system designed for EastLake Greens has adequate
capacity to accommodate the run-off generated b)' additional areas being inco11>orated into
EastLake Greens SPA boundary. as shown on the attached exhibit. In addition. areas being
added do not adversely impact the drainage s)'stem previously planned and approved as pal1 of
Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 88-03.
Should you have any questions. please call me.
Sincerely,
, RICK ENGIN~~_C?MPANY
~C~
Dennis C. Bowlin~.~.. R.C.E.
Director, Water Resources Division
DCB:kt.001
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Doug Reed, City of Chula Vista
Mr. Bruce Sloan. EastLake Developmem Company
Mr. Houshmand Aftahi, Rick Engineering Company
r~3 .
February 9. 1994
Mr. Cliff Swanson
City Engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: EastLake Greens Development Plan and
Spa Amendment IS,94-19
Dear Cliff:
As a part of the review of the referenced initial study the engineering
department noted possible adverse impacts to the sewer system serving the
EastLake Greens Project. As a response to this concern, I have quantified
the impact of the Plan Amendment in each of the sewer basins within the
EastLake Greens Project. This review (attached) has concluded that the
impacts of the additional development within each of the basins is minimal
when compared to previous land use and system analysis performed by the
city,
If you have any questions regarding this information, please do not
hesitate to call me.
,
Sincerely,
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Bruce Sloan
Senior Project Manager
cc: Doug Reid - Environmental Review Coordinator
L&
~
....
EA5TlAKE
DMlOPMENT
COMPANY
QOO lane Avenue
Suite 100
Chula Vls1a. CA 91914
(619) 421-0127
FAX (619) 421-1830
~
...-
SALT CREEK BASIN GRAVITY SEWER ANALYSIS
Sewer service to the Salt Creek Basin within the EastLake Greens
Project in currently provided by the Otay Lakes Road 11ft Station
(located at Otay Lakes Road and Salt Creek) and the Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development
Plan and Spa Amendment affects the following parcels within the Salt
Creek Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(south) 42 51 9
R-10 167 246 79
R.ll 92 87 <5>
R-22 146 141 <5>
R-23 205 214 9
R.27 40 44 4
Net Change In Units 91
The flow generated by the additional 91 dwelling units (based on 250
GPD per DU) is 15.8 GPM. This amount represents an increase of
1.4% over the 1100 GPM flow rate assumed to be generated by the
EastLake Project within the Salt Creek Basin (see Telegraph Canyon
Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment
Incorporating Pumped Flows, Figure 8, Page 11). The operation of the
Otay Lakes Road 11ft Station and Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer
should not be significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in
the flow rate.
.
TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN IMPROVEMENT AND FINACIAL PLAN
The proposed General Development Plan and Spa Plan Amendment
will affect 4 par~els (R-7, R-ll, R-14, and R-24) that are located
within the boundary of the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer Basin. At
the time the Basin Improvement and Financing Plan was developed
EastLake Development Company and the City assumed the unit counts
proposed in the Amendment. Therefore, no modification to the
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan is
required.
POGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN
Sewer service to the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin within the EastLake
Greens Project is cUITently provided by the EastLake Parkway Pump
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. The proposed
EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment
affects the following parcels within the Poggi Canyon Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increase+/
Decrease-
R-3(north) 42 51 9
R-14 84 86 2
R-15 88 65 <13>
R.20 164 143 <21>
R-25 74 78 4
R-28 27 60 33
Net Change In Units 14
The Average flow to the EastLake Parkway Pump Station (as outlined
in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan
Amendment Incorporating Pumped Flows) is 254 GPM. At a rate of
250 gallons per day per unit the net increase in units generates an
additional 2.4 GPM. The operation of the EastLake Parkway Lift
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should not be
significantly impacted by the relatively minor increase in flow rate.
NAR- ~-94 "..lED 1':.:1' t HilL' . I
=~ _ H ".' ~;T.'~ ::::;C-HO.:IL '11 '=.:T ~
P~02
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMt,lINCS Ph,O,
l.,I,RRY CUNNINGHAM
SHARON GilES
PAIRICK A. JUDO
GREG R. SANDOVAl
SUPERINTENDENT
llBIA S. Gll, Ph.D.
CHUl.A VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DIS'I1UCT
84 EAST "J" STREET. CHCL\ \'ISTA, CALIFOH...r-.:IA \11910 . 6194'25.9GOO
-~-_.-. .-...---.-----. -- ._-, ..--.-.----. ....-
EACH CHILD IS A.." J:-;D!\'IDCAL OF GREi\T WOHTll
March 9, 1994
Mr. Doug Reid
Environmental Review Dept
City of Chuta Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: EastLake Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
Dear Mr Reid
The proposed GDP/SPA Ame~,dr,len' wlil Increase the total dwelling unit count
within EastLake Greens by 9- units from ;t774 to 2871 At the District-wide
average student generation rate of 0 3 students/unit. this equates to 861 students.
It is anticipated that all crllldrer, fiom EastLf3I',e Greens Including those flOm the
additional 97 units wil; atte1:! SchOQ! No S5 which will be constructed In the
EastLake Greens Community and hHS a proposed opening date of July, 1995
This school is planned to cpen on a single-track year-round schedule and
eventually convert to a multi-track year-round schedule when required to
accommodate enrollment
All elementary school facilities within the EastLake Community will be financed by
participation in Community Facilities District No 1, which fully mitigates all project
impacts on schools.
If you have any questions, plec.se contact me
Sincerely,
,~~ ~\.~"-''-~('''-
Kate Shurson
Director, Planning & Facilities
"
KSdp
cc: Katy Wright
a..'ak..A,nond
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP (PCS 95-01)
r~---!~M_- ,
i I;
f-
ill
,;~
..'
il!
!i~
."!!
:i~
l'i
ii,
r.
To'
"',
!..!
. ;.I!
I I~ e!il~'
, .1-- ~
'If. j.m ~
II! ~I i~~!;
,llti' f.j'",
",' '''!'I'
1 . ~:n .
I"'.i b'.' t:
H~. ;;:1=:;"
: .... i: -~~i~"
... I .... 'i I'I-~I ""
~ . I ~.~ it I" ei
": ,,"1;1 ~';j II
: i I, ,,, "I'"
III . I I~i' '" 'i ~~
:: I i Ii .!! f._!~ i~
. ' .
I', , "
M'I" .
:,1 Ii,!!;
!~. 4~
.:!:: j~ 1, !
. !.- '" -.1:::
~ " : .~I: "! ii:!
i I~ I. I ' !; ,,!'
! ." il ""1
:~ .i ,.: '1 ~'i;
~.. -I. ~j ~I"
'-I :" I I,; ~- ,. .;~
," ~ " ."
I. -!. p'i .n;J
-, I, " h'!' "",
'1'- --: liI,oi
,!I';!!PI..i!,1
! i,I~; i,' '1,-" " ..:
. _ .13 >. _.81'
,
.'
.1
~~ g~
i: ~;
iE ;!
~, e"
~B ~.
" ,'-,'
0- ~I "
~~ ~~ .1
I"! .~
~jl ';
,I\! Ii
il ~~ !~
f !i. !~~
i
II
!~
~i
"
!~
;.
~:
~~
i'
~I
,.
1;
U I II UIIII
~ii@du 11 ~.~kll
..
,i
!.
i,',
. ,
, .
~. -!
' "Z
~ '-/, i~
"0
"
....
o
I
10
~<>>
~6:.
a..c:Z~
<OL-M
~ 0 ~
W<....
W Z~ g
>0 !J1
.....~<I:I
~ CI)..... ffi
ZQ~~
W...J>~
..... W ~
-<!!!
L1....J
::>
:I:
o
1\ \
\~
\\,.\. \ \,
I '
, \\\
C'
'..
~ i[
~ do
\
L_--
1:'
c
<
""\
'~ "'
\~ 3~
( /
,
I .
'II. I, "1
~. \l
_'0; ,\
\ I
3.'
~
Z
.
i
3 I I ji <--
~ I: OCh,J/
2" Ici._'VC]
I ~j
.
----------
j
~.~
I<i!~
,,,,Ij" II
;'b I 1'0, .~
'3,~iR :1 :i': ..;i ~I
~,'- !i!
r: I': II,
t I
. 1J i
- i
ill" ,wi
!', .1
9iJ
II
;1
'\;-
8.'1
",
iihi
~ i ~ 1!
,I j
-.5 ~
~ lii!1
" \1'
~~!!~
J
~.9
::~'lj,
'I i
" J"
- ~~~
.. "
..
i ~
y
.
.
.;
.
.
o
.
.
.
Ii;
5
~
I
;
.
~
.
.
o
.!
"
,I
'.
it
;; I
H ,
'I !
,. .
..
.
,
!
i
,
"
1
,
I
I
~ ~
I ~
'i
"
~ J t
"'1'
I a;;!I
" ,
I ~
,II
GOLF COURSE TRAIL
CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
\
W
en
a::
::>
o
U
IJ..
...J
o
"
~
\
\
()
I,
,
...J
<(
a::
I-
W-
I-
W
a::
U
z
o
U
"
z
a::
W
o
z
L1i
~
"
z
a:
<(
U
en
c
z
<(
...J
"
Z
;::
en
X
W
-
a::.
w~
~
a::
<(
~
...J
<(
a::
I-
o
,
J
~
a::
o
~I
~I
~I
:JI
'1
:5
<(
~
~
~
ir
...J
...J
<(.-
~ ~
" <(
Z ...J
Z 0
<( Z
1-....
W 0
a:: W
..... m
z a::
W W
W >
Cl. 5 0
o ...JenU
I- ;;i, Z a:
~ ~ 0 ~
en ..... I- m
wW<(::>
a: U z a::
.....z-::t
I- W IX) C/)
ii:; IJ.. ~
o ;: 0
Cl. W U
~ :;
W
:;
~-i~
, ~ ,
'" - ""
'\~~
Q.
o
l-
f/)
~
w
a:
.........
I-
Z
6
Q.
~
W
-
>
c
Z
<I:
..J
Ci
a:
I-
w
en
a:
~
o
o
LL
..J
g
-J
-
<
a:
I-
C)
Z
a:
w
c
Z_
<w
WI-
~w
wet
CO
-Z
~O
- 0
CO _
'0
'"
>-..JI-~
I-<tw<
-;:)(/)>
ZI-w_
;:)Uma:
~< a.
~et-J..J_
ow..J<:j
UI-~~<
C(/)(/)Z
:J~(/)~c
Oa.Z-et
(/);;:o(/)_
;> -- W .....
:I:I-et>-
C):jC3et~
:I:<oo(j)
Ln~..JLL_
,CE
. .
. .
-&1:
. .
....
W
w
a:
....
CJ)
o
-
....I
CQ
::>
Q.
....
<t
....I
<C
a:
'-
- ~ ~
- . <$"
~'~~
J:-$..~
" " Q
\\. '" -
~
c,
'"
0,
~
1HB CITY OF anJlA VISTA DISCI OSURB STA'IEMENT
You are required to file a Slatement of Disclosure or cenaln OWIIenhlp or ft.naDaal Intcrcala, paymOll1l, or campllp
conu1bulioDi, 011 aU maneB which wtll require d!icretlonary aclloll on the pan of the City CoUllcU, Plalllllng Commiaalon. alld
all other omelal bocIiea. lbe rollowing informatloD mUll be dilt:lO&ec1:
1. Ust the: Damc:i of all persons bavlDg a finaDciallntol'c:lt III the property wblch Ii the subject of the application or Ihe
contract, e:.g.. owner, applicant, WDIlac:lOr, su1>colltrac:tor, malerial supplier.
EastLake Development Company
2. If allY peBon" Idelltllied pursuallt to (1) above Ii a mrporatloll or pannershlp,list the nama of aU IIIdlvlduall ownlll,
more than 1~ of the sb.area in the corporation or 0WIIiD1 III)' partDC/'IhJp IIItereatlll the putIIenhJp.
Boswell Properties Incorporated
Tulago Company
3. It any person' identified pursuant to (1) above Ii non-profit organlzat1ol1 or a trust, list tbe Dimes of any penon
servinl as director of Ihe nOIl-prollt organl;r.alion or as trustee or bellelldary or trustor of tbe trusL
N/A
4. Have )'Ou had more than SZSO wonh of buslnCII transacted wltb aay mmtber of the City slllr. Boards, CommiaaloDl.
Committees. and Council within the past rwclve months? Yca_ No_ Ir yes, pJeue Inc\Ic:ate person(s):
5. Please identify each snd every person. including any aaenta. empl~, mllluJllnta, or IIIdependent contractors who
)'Ou have assigned to tepre&ellt you before the ClI)' in thIIltlltter.
Gary Cinti - Cinti Land Planning
Bill Ostrem - EastLake Development Co.
Roger Bhatia - Rick Engineering Co.
Bruce Sloan - EastLake Development Co.
Kent Aden - EastLake Development Co.
6. Have you ancl/or )'Out oftlccn or agcllla, in Ibe surept.. contributed more than $1,000 10 a COuDc:ilDlember III the
current or prccedln, eJection period? Ves_ NoL If yea, SlIte which COunc:Umember(s):
. . "(NO'IE: AttadI addJdou1 pap u
Date: 7 ~ II ~ '1 i
.
Gail Crocenzi, Assistant Project Manager PrlDt or type name of mntractorllppUcant
· l!!!!!1bM/lMtl-.. -Any~""'" ...,......,jDIIJ~ &In'" . .1fIJ1&iM club,"""" ~~ ,...-'-\ '*r-a.... __.......... ~
__80\110lIl",_. <10>-_. <IO>~ ~ ..._poI/IIuJ_..u;o", ....".__..._n ....--.