Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1993/11/17 (2) City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of November 17, 1993 Page 1 1. PUBLIC HEARING: PCM 94-06: Consideration of an amendment to the Olvmpic Training Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) to allow construction of prioritv (Core) athletic facilities - San Diego National Sports Training Foundation A. BACKGROUND On May 1, 1990, the City Council approved the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) for the Olympic Training Center (OTC) to be located adjacent to Lower Otay Lake, within the Community of Eastlake. The Sectional Planning Area Plan for OTC calls for the development of a 150 acre campus- like sports training facility for elite athletes. The long-range master plan for the OTC upon which the SPA was based is shown on Exhibit 1. The PFFP sets forth the phasing and timing of public facilities construction based on a two-phase project development scenarIO . Development of the OTC was anticipated to occur in two phases, each requiring approval of a precise plan prior to construction. The Design Review Committee approved the Olympic Training Center Phase 1 Precise Plan (Exhibit II) on March 18, 1991. Although the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation has recently been quite successful in raising funds to construct on-site infrastructure improvements, the persisting economic recession has created circumstances that require construction staging of the Phase I Precise Plan. On August 10, 1993, the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation filed an application requesting consideration of amendments to the SPA Plan and PFFP texts as well as their original conditions of approval, to allow the construction of Phase I priority buildings and sports venues prior to completion of permanent off-site road and utility service infrastructure to serve the project site. An Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR -89-11) for the Olympic Training Center has been prepared to address environmental impacts associated with this proposal (Attachment A). The addendum found that the proposal will not have any potentially significant environmental impacts. B. RECOMMENDATION 1. Re-certify SEIR-89-11 and re-adopt its CEQA Findings, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, Statement of Overriding Considerations and review and consider the Addendum to SEIR-89-11 prior to taking action on the SPA Plan and PFFP amendments (all of which are attached behind the draft City Council Resolution). City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of November 17, 1993 Page 2 2. Adopt the attached resolution, PCM 94-06, recommending that the City Council: a. Re-certify SEIR-89-ll and consider the addendum thereto. b. Approve the amendments to the Olympic Training Center Sectional Planning Area Plan text as shown on Attachment B and the Public Facilities Financing Plan text as shown in Attachment C, subject to the conditions contained therein. c. Re-adopt the CEQA Findings, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for EIR-89-11. C. DISCUSSION Construction Phasing The applicant proposes incremental construction of the Phase I Precise Plan athletic facilities. The proposed phasing has been necessitated in part by funding shortages and by delays in the construction of off-site street and utility service improvements. Implementation of the proposed construction phasing plans will enable USOC to commence operations of OTC in the Spring of 1994. A "Core facilities" development proposal (see Exhibit III), consisting of priority building and sports venues, has been developed as the initial construction stage of the Phase I Precise Plan, The proposal has been tailored to best utilize presently available funds for on-site improvements and address the most immediate athletic facility needs. The following are included in the Core facilities development proposal. Sports Venues Tennis (four courts) Swimming (50-meter pool and adjacent poolhouse. Poolhouse will incorporate lockers, restroom, pool utilities room and temporary athlete's weight room) Soccer ( four fields) Field Hockey (one field) Archery (entire outdoor venue) Athletics (entire outdoor venue) Softball (two fields) Criterion Course Maintenance and Storage Facilities Outbuildings (used for equipment storage, one building per sport) Maintenance and Grounds building City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of November 17, 1993 Page 3 Athlete Housing and Administrative Facilities Thirty-five (35) housing units Dining Hall National Governing Bodies (NGB) Office building (to be used as a sports science/sports medicine training center) The balance of the previously approved Phase I sports venues and athlete housing and administrative facilities are intended to be constructed as needed, and as financing becomes available and off-site infrastructure facilities necessary for subsequent project phasing are completed. These are as follows: Sports Venues Tennis (remaining eight courts) Diving Pool Field Hockey (second field) Gymnasium Athlete Housing and Administrative Facilities One hundred fifteen (lIS) additional housing units Completion of the administrative center (athlete's reception, recreation, NGB offices and meeting room facilities) Sports Science/sports medicine complex (including permanent weight room) Visitor's Center Interim Infrastructure Major off-site capital facilities, including primary access road extensions (Hunte Parkway from Telegraph Canyon Road to Orange Avenue, and Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the westerly boundary of the project site) and utility service extensions to the site were to be constructed by Eastlake Development Company as part of the development of Eastlake II and Eastlake III prior to the originally planned 1993 opening date for the Center. However, the development of these EastLake Communities has not progressed as originally planned, and therefore, the street and utility extensions required by the OTC have yet to be constructed. Wueste Road, which was intended to provide secondary access, is now proposed to function as the sole interim access into the site. Interim infrastructure for water and sewer services is proposed as follows: . A temporary offsite water line which will connect the OTC site with a water main in Hunte Parkway has been approved by the Otay Water District and installation has been completed. The line will serve the Center until the Hunte City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of November 17, 1993 Page 4 Parkway - Orange Avenue connection to Wueste Road has been completed by Eastlake. . A temporary off-site sewer line is proposed to be constructed to provide for sewer service to the site. This line will extend from Telegraph Canyon Road directly south to the OTC site. Like the interim waterline, the temporary sewer line will serve the OTC until the Orange A venue extension is constructed. SPA Plan and PFFP amendment proposal The amendments to the OTC SPA Plan and PFFP do not propose any additions or changes to the buildings, venues or facilities shown on the OTC Masterplan, or those approved as part of the Phase I Precise Plan. The plan amendments only involve: a) modification of the conditions of the SPA and PFFP approval that require the construction of Hunte Parkway and Orange A venue prior to the opening of the Center, b) addition of a condition to require traffic studies to verify actual Core facility trip generation prior to subsequent construction of Phase I facilities, c) addition of conditions to require street light and road improvements along Wueste Road, d) modification of the condition requiring specialized on-site fire services and equipment, e) addition of conditions requiring appropriate environmental review and issuance of permits by the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service and the City of Chula Vista, f) a number of SPA and PFFP Plan "housekeeping" text revisions which define the scope of the Phase I construction stages, and interim infrastructure construction and update fire and emergency service requirements based on currently available services to the OTC site. D. ANAL YSIS Staff has reviewed the "Core facility" development proposal and has concluded that the proposed phasing will adequately address all on-site needs, including parking as well as on-site pedestrian and vehicular circulation. It has also been determined that Wueste Road and the interim improvements. for water and sewer are sufficient to serve the OTC Core facilities. Wueste Road, as currently designed, can support a total of 1800 ADT's, The current traffic volume on Wueste Road is 850 ADT's. The anticipated ADT's generated by Core facility operations is 945 ADT's. Conditions #2 and #3 to the approval of the SPA Plan and PFFP are proposed to be amended to delay but require construction of the Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue extensions upon generation of 950 or more ADT's from Phase I Precise Plan facility operations, In order to properly implement revised conditions #2 and #3, it has been recommended that an analysis of actual trip generation from the Core facilities be conducted prior to any subsequent Phase I facility construction in accordance with condition "D" of the draft resolution. Furthermore, the Engineering Department has recommended that the developer install a street light at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Wueste Road, and overlay Wueste Road from Otay Lakes Road to the OTC Boathouse entrance in order to improve safety and traffic City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of November 17,1993 Page 5 flow along Wueste Road. These street light and road improvements, have been included as conditions "E" and "F" in the attached draft resolution. The construction and operation of Fire Station No. 6 at Otay Lakes Road and Lane A venue has eliminated the need for specialized on-site fire services and equipment. Condition of approval #20 has been amended to reflect current emergency service needs by requiring only on-site private or volunteer police personnel and eliminating the requirements for on-site fire and emergency medical services by private or volunteer personnel, an on-site fire brigade and an emergency fire pumper. The Environmental Review Coordinator has recommended, in light of the recent listing of the gnatcatcher as a threatened species and potential impacts of the project to Coastal Sage Scrub, that proof of an "incidental take permit" under Section 7 or Section lOA of the Endangered Species Act, or any other form of approval by the u.S. Fish and Wildlife Service relative to California Gnatcatcher and Coastal Sage Scrub should be provided to the Environmental Review Coordinator prior to consideration of any final subdivision or parcel map, issuance of grading permits or issuance of building permits for any portion of the project. If such permit is not required at the time of project development, written verification to that effect from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service should be provided to the Environmental Review Coordinator. Any project redesign requiring the issuance of a Section 7 or lOA permit may require reconsideration by the appropriate City decision making body. In addition, the Environmental Review Coordinator has recommended that the San Diego Sports Training Foundation provide the City of Chula Vista with a detailed revegetation plan, approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, prior to the construction of the left-turn pockets along Wueste Road adjacent to the OTC athletes' entrance and boathouse access road entrance. The above recommendations have been included as conditions "G" and "H" in the attached draft resolution. WPC F:\home\planning\1402.93 EXHIBIT I ..........n.. ,... f;:;::-.~~ ~ _----,;1'" ,-",'q..,~ -, "," err ~",.,.Q , " '~.J\ '" ~ .i '.'~ . Jti. ,,\..... ~ I' g I,,> ". ~J..o",,, \"" ''';',~ . 0 Ifi" .'; .... I ,. .... ":./1 .;, S> ~...., 4! r'~ ..." .',,1 ", ,."......"".... \Q I'- 1'1 I " ~'--....., ur", ......... .~. ) OLYMPIC CENTER MASTER PLAN n.be..." UNITED STATES OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SAN DIEGO THE SAN l)IEGO NATrONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE . 'Of Z~ M EB SKIDMORE. OWINGS & MERRILL TUCKER SADLER & ASSOCIATES AR:CHITEcr WYA ASSOCIATES !-ANDSCAPf; 4.RClffn:cr RICK ENGINEERING CIVIL F:NGlNF.F.R PATRICK MADDUX GRAPHIC DF~'iIGN FRANCIS KRAHE LIGHTING DF-~GN URBAN SYSTEM ASSOCIATES TRAmc CONSULTANT THE M'KINLEY GROUP PLANNING CONSULTAI'rr 100\1.... r-- EXHIBIT II ";,I,'!I, " )1 ./ /1/ /I/!! dill!! 11(/) I I' / l, 1'/ ;' , I , ',', i' , ,I :'///1 FIRST PHASE PRECISE PLAN UNITED STATES OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SAN DIEGO THE SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMI'ITEE ,...... EB SKIDMORE, OWINGS & MERRILL TUCKER SADLER lit ASSOCIATES ARCHITECT WYA ASSOCIATES LANDSCAPE ARCHITEcr RICK ENGINEERING CIVILENGINU:R PATRICK MADDUX GRAPHIC DL'if(;N "'RANCJS KRAHE lIlOHTING DtslGN UR8AN SYSTEM ASSOCIATES TRAnlc CONSULTANT THE M'KINLEY GROUP I'LANNING CONSUL-':ANT ~O",_ . ,.. ... EXHIBIT III '--.;c 1(1 I' I 0 'II I ,I -).'.Z,ly ':' _ /J' I ',i', ' ! 'i ,,',Ii '.",::i~l: '~ '\ " ,,' , , ,\ ::~, ~:_-~ I ) , 'II " 'I II( ! () <) m_<~r ----=-=.. i ,I , ! , ' . , '(>, , ' I'" /' i,l ! i i , :' .,1 i ,i '.,' I;' :'::::.::',::,"'''''''''' CORE F __ ACILlTIES ,;;,,111. -",:,:,'::.,;,;,:,:::,:,;:",:,~~,,:.',:~;,,;,,-;,;- E9 NORTH RESOLUTION PCS 94-06 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECERTIFYING THE SUPPLEMENTAL EIR FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SEIR 89-11), CONSIDERING AN ADDENDUM THERETO, RE- ADOPTING THE CEQA FINDINGS, MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS ON SEIR-89.11 AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCE PLAN (PFFP) WHEREAS, on August 10,1993, an application for amendments to the Olympic Training Center (OTC) Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and a Public Facilities Finance Plan (pFFP) amendment was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on August 10, 1993 by the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation ("Developer"), and WHEREAS, said application requested approval of modifications to the previously approved by City Council on May 1, 1990 Olympic Training Center SPA Plan and PFFP to allow the applicant to proceed with construction of Phase I priority building and sports venues prior to construction of pennanent off-site road and utility service infrastructure to serve the project site ("Project"), and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 ft. of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and WHEREAS, a second Addendum to the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR-89-11) for the Olympic Training Center SPA Plan has been prepared to address environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the Project. NOW, TIlEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TIlAT TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION has re-certified SEIR-89-11 and re-adopted its CEQA Findings, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Statement of Overriding Considerations, BE IT FURTIlER RESOLVED THAT TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION has considered the second addendum to SEIR-89-11 for the OTC and finds that the Project, as a later activity to that evaluated in SEIR 89-11, and as conditioned, would have no significant effects that were not examined in the preceding documents (Guideline 15168 (c)(1)). RESOLUTION PCS 94-06 Page 2 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution, thereby approving the amendments to the Olympic Training Center SPA and PFFP texts based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this November 17, 1993 by the following vote. to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: A TrEST: Thomas A, Martin, Chainnan Nancy Ripley, Secretary WPC F:\Jwme'Planning\l413.93 DRAFT RESOLUTION NO, A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RECERTIFYING THE SUPPLEMENTAL EIR FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, (SEIR 89-11), CONSIDERING AN ADDENDUM THERETO, AMENDING THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AND PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN AND RE-ADOPTING THE CEQA FINDINGS, MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS ON SEIR-89-11 1. RECITALS A. Project Site WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically represented on Attachment A-I attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, identified as the Olympic Training Center site, and located adjacent to the Lower Otay Lake within the Community of Eastlake of the City of Chula Vista ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, on August 10, 1993, the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation ("Developer") filed an application requesting consideration of amendments to the SPA Plan (known as Document No. I on file with the Office of the City Clerk) and PFFP (known as Document No.2 on file with the Office of the City Clerk) text and conditions of project approval ("Application for Discretionary Approval"), to allow the developer to proceed with the construction of priority buildings and sports venues prior to construction of permanent off-site road and utility service infrastructure to serve the Project Site ("Project"), and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of a General Development Plan (EastLake III General Development Plan) previously approved by the City Council on December 5, 1989 by Resolution No, 15413 ("GDP Resolution"); wherein the City Council, in the environmental evaluation of said GDP relied in part on the EastLake III/Olympic Training Center Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 89-9, SCH No. 89080929 ("SEIR 89-9"), and WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of a Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and a Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP), previously approved by the City Council on May I, 1990 by Resolution No. 15599 ("Olympic Training Center SPA Plan and PFFP Resolution") wherein the City Council, in the environmental evaluation of said SPA Plan and PFFP relied in part on the u.S. Olympic Training Center Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 89-11, SCH 89010284 ("SEIR 89-11 "), and DRAFT Resolution No. Page 2 D. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said project on November 17, 1993, voted to recommend that the City Council approve the SPA Plan and PFFP amendments in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below and recommended that the City Council re-approve each and everyone of the CEQA Findings as found in SEIR-89-11. E. City Council Record on Application WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council of the City ofChula Vista on December 7, 1993, on the Discretionary Approval Application, and to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine, and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this Project held on November 17, 1993, and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. III. SEIR AND ADDENDUM REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED The City Council of the City of Chula Vista has reviewed, analyzed and considered SEIR 89-11 (known as Document No.3 on file in the Office of the City Clerk), the environmental impacts therein identified for this project; the Candidate Finding of Fact ("Findings" or "CEQA Findings") and the Statements of Overriding Consideration (known as Document No.4 on file in the Office of the City Clerk), the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as Document No. 5 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and Second Addendum (known as Document No.6 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior to approving the Project. IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The City Council does hereby find that SEIR-89-11, the Candidate Findings of Fact, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the Statement of Overriding Considerations and Second Addendum have been prepared in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista. V. INDEPENDENT mDGEMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council finds that SEIR-89-11 and Second Addendum reflect the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council. DRAFT Resolution No. Page 3 VI. SPA AND PFFP FINDINGS A. THE OTC SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE III GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The amended Olympic Training Center Sectional Planning Area Plan reflects land use, circulation system, and public facilities that are consistent with the Eastlake III General Development Plan and the Chula Vista General Plan. The Olympic Training Center proposes athletic training facilities that are consistent with the public and quasi-public designations depicted on the General Development Plan and General Plan. B. THE OTC SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN, AS AMENDED WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA. The SPA Plan and Public Facilities Plan, as amended, sets forth and further clarifies the phasing of the project and the timing of public facilities construction to ensure the orderly, sequentialized development of the project. The Public Facilities Financing Plan identifies the public facilities, public services needed to serve the project. The amendments reflect necessary changes to the timing of construction. C. THE OTC SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLAN AS AMENDED WILL NOT ADVERSEL Y AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION, OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The land uses within the Olympic Training Center represent the same uses approved by the Eastlake III General Development Plan. The majority of the 150:t acre site (82%) will consist of open practice facilities for soccer, field hockey, archery, tennis, cycling, athletics, and swimming. The project has been planned to provide the necessary support for U.S. athletes seeking to compete in international competition. The site plan is compatible with adjacent land uses and will avoid off-site impacts through the provision of mitigation measures specified in the OTC Supplemental Environmental Impact Report. D. THE OTC PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN AS AMENDED IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CVMC CHAPTER 19.09 PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS PERTAINING TO PUBLIC FACILITY FINANCE PLANS. The PFFP amendment has been prepared and has been reviewed in accordance with CVMC Sections 19,09.070 and 19.09.080. DRAFT Resolution No. Page 4 VII. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Olympic Training Center Sectional Planning Area and Public Facilities Finance Plan amendments subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The approval of the foregoing Discretionary Approvals Applications which are stated to be conditioned on "General Conditions" are hereby conditioned as follows: A. Project Site is Improved with Project. Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the SEIR, except as modified by this Resolution. B. Implement Mitigation Measures. Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the SEIR that are found by this resolution to be feasible. C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, all portions of the Olympic Training Center Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project. IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Conditions 2, 3 and 20 of Resolution No. 15599 approving the Olympic Training Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan and Public Facilities financing plan shall be amended to read as follows: A. Condition #2 Upon generation of 950 or more ADT from Phase I Precise Plan facility operations, the applicant shall construct Hunte Parkway to a four-lane Major Street Standard from Telegraph Canyon Road to Orange Avenue. Said construction shall include improvements of 20 feet of pavement on each side of a fully improved landscaped median including street lights. Improvement of the intersection of Hunte Parkway and Orange A venue shall include transitions as directed by the City Engineer. B. Condition #3 Upon generation of 950 or more ADT from Phase I Precise Plan facility operations, the applicant shall construct Orange Avenue to a four-lane Major roadway as follows: DRAFT Resolution No. Page 5 1. From Hunte Parkway to the westerly boundary of the project: 20 feet of pavement on each side of a fully improved landscaped median including street lights, Improvements at the intersection of Hunte Parkway and Orange A venue shall include transitions as directed by the City Engineer. II. From the westerly boundary to the easterly boundary of the project: Full improvements to include, but not be limited to, A.C. pavement and base, curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lights and drainage facilities. C. Condition #20 Police shall be provided by properly trained, on-site private or volunteer personnel, subject to entering into an agreement with the City prior to issuance of use and occupancy certificates. In addition, the applicant shall provide fire suppression equipment and facilities, together with sprinklering and other mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the City's Fire Prevention Bureau. Transition to City fire protection and emergency medical services shall occur on a schedule established by the City. Said schedule shall be based on the construction of planned fire stations in the Salt Creek Project and in the Otay Ranch project area west of Lower Otay Reservoir, as outlined in the City's Fire Station Master Plan. D. The applicant shall perform traffic studies to verify trip generation rates from Core Facilities prior to construction of any subsequent Phase I building or sports venue facility, The applicant may construct additional Phase I facilities at the discretion of the Planning Director, only if existing and projected traffic generated by subsequent project construction equals or is less than 950 ADT. E. The developer shall install a street light at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Wueste Road. F. The developer shall overlay Wueste Road from Otay Lakes Road to the OTC Boathouse entrance, as required by the City Engineer. The developer shall be reimbursed for fifty percent (50%) of the Wueste Road overlay cost by the City of Chula Vista. G. The developer shall provide proof of an "incidental take permit" under Section 7 or Section lOA of the Endangered Species Act or any other form of approval by the U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service relative to California Gnatcatcher or Coastal Sage Scrub to the Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department prior to the consideration of any final subdivision or parcel map, issuance of a grading permit, or issuance of a building permit for any portion of the project site. If such a permit is not required, written verification to that effect from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be provided to the Environmental Section of the Planning Department. Any project redesign which would require the issuance of a Section 7 or lOA permit may require reconsideration by the appropriate City decision making body. DRAFT Resolution No. Page 6 H. The developer shall provide the City of Chula Vista with a detailed revegetation plan, approved by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, prior to construction of the left-turn pockets along Wueste Road, adjacent to the OTC athletes' entrance and boathouse access road. X. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS. If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their tenns, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval of this Resolution. XI. CEQA FINDINGS, MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM, AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. A. Readoption of Findings. The City Council does hereby reapprove, accept as its own, incorporate as if set forth in full herein, and make each and every one of the findings contained in the "Candidate Findings of Fact". B. Certain Mitigation Measures Feasible and Adopted. As more fully identified and set forth in SEIR-89-11 and in the Candidate Findings of Fact, the Council hereby finds pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 that the mitigation measures described as feasible in the above referenced documents, are feasible, and will become binding upon the entity (such as the project proponent, the City, or the school district) assigned thereby to implement same. C. Infeasibility of Alternatives. As is also noted in the above referenced environmental documents described in the above subparagraph B, each of the alternatives to the project which were identified as potentially feasible in SEIR-89-11 are found not to be feasible since they could not meet both the objectives of the Project and avoid the identified significant environmental effects through implementation of feasible mitigation measures for the reasons set forth in said Candidate Findings of Fact. DRAFT Resolution No. Page 7 D. Readoption of Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. As required by the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, the City Council hereby readopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program"). The Council hereby finds that the Program is designed to ensure that during project implementation the permittee/project applicant and any other responsible parties implement the project components and comply with the feasible mitigation measures identified in the Candidate Findings of Fact and the Program. E. Statement of Overriding Considerations. Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures and any feasible alternatives, certain significant or potentially significant environmental effects caused by the project, or cumulatively, will remain. Therefore, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista hereby reissues, pursuant to CEQA Guideline Section 15093, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, identifying the specific economic, social, and other considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse environmental effects acceptable. XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION, The Environmental Review Coordinator of the City of Chula Vista is directed after City Council approval of this Project to ensure that a Notice of Determination is filed with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego. XIlI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION. It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more tenns, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. Presented by Approved as to from by Director of Planning Bruce M, Boogaard City Attorney WPC F:\home\planning\1415.93 " ~''l- .......~f_ \ I: IL- ~r/ .~-_~ c:--~ Ir-< , ' 'F~', .... )1,--" ~-. (p~~~~V. J\= ", j)lir " ..' ');)t~{.-,\, .---- )L~<~\ '; ~-~' \~\ '- Lf\~S~ ~..,~:Q _..J. / \\/~~c-.'-,:..q~+O-t ,., ~ \~.~~-~-_.,~ !J;.. <> . ~O'(T" A':'I'"-/.7 --~\- /- h/..-J, " / /.,.// /'~:..-:~.'-J~.':-':'/'._.'" =,/.' ~ L.;- (.... -:~, -,- , . . ~ \\ ,~i~ ~-~~~ ......I~ I )L' 1['. \~;\.' -----.,- ' ~ .../ \ '\ '\, i, . \j fo< / L------~ .. .~/ . PROJECT LOCATION ~ ,.. ",. . .. . .. . v------------- ---:;;;- ~ ~~- .. " , ... . --:-~--===-.:--'~ ~-~ ~. ~ CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Q) APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Planning Department Olympic Training Center SPA plan ADDRESS: WUESTE ROAD and PFFP plan amendment. SCALE: FILE NUMBER: ATTACHMENT A-I NORTH NO SCALE PCM - 94 - 06 ATTACHMENT A SECOND ADDENDUM TO SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SEIR) FOR THE OTC SPA PLAN (SEIR 89-11) Olympic Training Center PROJECT NAME: Olympic Training Center - Core Facilities Proposal PROJECT LOCATION: Bounded on the east by Wueste Road adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir PROJECT APPLICANT: San Diego National Sports Training Foundation PROJECT AGENT: Laurie McKinley - McKinley Nielsen CASE NO.: SEIR-89-11 Second Addendum I. INTRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERe) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present: I, The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; 2. Changes in circumstances, additional or refined infonnation available since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration, After additional study, this addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional infonnation and analysis concerning biology, traffic, sewage, and public safety. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions of the previous Supplemental Environmental Impact Report have not changed, Traffic, sewage, biological, and public safety impacts are found to be less than significant. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following Second Addendum to the OTC SPA Plan SEIR-89-11. /- c;( i) II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project originally consisted of the buildout of the complete 150 acre Olympic Training Center. It was environmentally analyzed in Supplemental EIR-89-11 for the Sectional Planning Area Plan approvals for the OTC, On August 10, 1993, the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation (SDNSTF) submitted an application to amend the SPA plan and Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) to reflect new or different phasing of development plans. Specifically, the SDNSTF intends to pull grading and building permits and construct an initial "core facility" ("Core Facility Proposal") which will include the following: 1. Construction of the following sports venues: tennis (four courts), swimming (50-meter pool and adjacent poolhouse incorporating lockers, restroom, pool utilities room and temporary athletes' weight room, soccer (four fields), field hockey (one field), archery, athletics, softball two fields and a criterion course. The Olympic Training Center Boathouse, although previously separately environmentally reviewed (EIR-90-l2), followed the environmental review of the Olympic Training Center and was proposed with the project description assumption that Orange A venue extension would be built and that other infrastructure improvements would be completed prior to its construction. Because of the fact that the proposed infrastructure has not been built yet, this Addendum also includes analysis of the impact of the construction of the Boathouse on biology, sewage, traffic, parking and public safety. 2. The construction of the first 35 housing units of the Training Center, providing beds for approximately 70-100 athletes. An additional 60 athletes are expected to train at the site while living offsite in the local community, and approximately 15 coaches are expected to be working onsite each day, along with 3 sports medicine/sports science professionals. 3. In addition to sports venues and housing, the Core Facilities Proposal includes an administrative center, which will incorporate athlete's check-in, a security building, maintenance facility, and a sports science/sports medicine training center. The athlete's dining hall and outbuildings (used for equipment storage, one building per sport) and maintenance and grounds buildings will also be constructed, All the buildings and venues in the Core Facilities Plan are part of the approved Phase I Precise Plan and have completed discretionary permit review, including design review, -2- /- .;? I The balance of the previously approved Phase I sports venue and athlete housing and administrative facilities are intended to be constructed as needed, and as financing becomes available and off-site infrastructure necessary for subsequent project phasing are completed. These are as follows: SDorts Venues Tennis (remaining eight courts) Diving Pool Field Hockey (second field) Gymnasium Athlete Housin!! and Administrative Facilities One hundred fifteen (1 15) additional housing units Completion of the administrative center (athlete's reception, recreation, NGB offices and meeting room facilities) Sports Science/sports medicine complex (including permanent weight room) Visitor's Center III. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS A. Traffic Permanent primary access to the project area will be Telegraph Canyon Road, Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue. Regional access is provided by I-80S, located west of the site. The future construction of State Route 125 would provide additional north- south access for future traffic volumes. The SPA Plan and PFFP Plan amendments propose, on an interim basis until Orange Avenue is complete, that Wueste Road serve as the primary access to the project. Athletes, employees and visitors travel from Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road to Wueste Road driving adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir to the project's eastern entrance. Wueste Road has been designated as a special "Rural Recreation Access Facility," preserving the existing features of the two-lane road, without the normally required curbs and sidewalks. The difference between this proposed amendment and the requirements set out regarding circulation/access in EIR-89-11 is postponement of the construction of Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road, -3- /-;;?;Q Currently, there are 850 average daily trips on Wueste Road. The anticipated ADTs generated by the Core Facility operations is 945, The expected additional trips are still less than the ],] 00 trips expected for Wueste Road at project buildout, when visitor traffic will use Orange A venue as a primary access to the athletes' entrance, Almost all traffic will be generated during off-peak hours, The bulk of the projected traffic is anticipated visitor traffic (593 ADT), which will occur primarily between the non-peak periods of 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. Improvements are required to Wueste Road from Orange A venue to the southerly boundary to bring Wueste Road in conformance with the following standard: 24 feet of A.C, pavement overlay, 8 feet graded shoulder on each side of the pavement. The pavement will be widened to provide left turn lanes into the boathouse entrance and the athletes entrance. The latter is proposed for the remainder of Phase ]. (There are biological considerations regarding the widening which are analyzed in the Biology section of this Addendum.) The City Engineer stated in a memo dated June 3, ] 993 that this projected phasing is acceptable provided that a street light is installed at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Wueste Road and that Wueste Road is overlaid from Otay Lakes Road to the boathouse entrance. The overlay is necessary to handle the additional traffic generated by the temporary use of Wueste Road as the primary access to the aTe. The originally proposed ]50 acre OTC included the requirement that Orange Avenue be built to Wueste Road. This is still the required mitigation for ultimate buildout. However, it is not required for the newly planned, first phase of the project. If the total average daily trips on Wueste Road exceed ] ,800, 8-foot shoulders on both sides of Wueste Road will be required. Parking Four hundred ninety-three parking spaces have already been constructed on the site. A total of 280 automobile parking spaces are required to serve the Core Facilities. This anticipates up to 600 visitors a day at the site; a number not expected to be reached until the Center has been opened and operating for some time, Buses Some OTC visitors will arrive by bus. It is expected that, on average, ]04 buses daily will travel to the site and need parking, The trip generation rates for the buses were included in the analysis of proposed trip generation in the preceding section. On -4- 1~;?..3 occasion, a school or other special event may occur onsite, requiring parking for additional uses, B. Sewer Impacts The Core Facilities Proposal also includes a temporary sewer system that will service the athletes using the Core Facilities and residing on the site as well as visitors, The system is to be operative for an estimated four-year period until 1997 when EastLake will build a permanent system, A proposed gravity sewer carries the flow west across a cultivated area to a proposed pump station located east of Salt Creek, The 4" force main runs north from the pump station and connects with an existing gravity sewer at Otay Lakes Road. This temporary system is designed to carry the current discharge as well as the anticipated flows in the next 4-5 years. The area proposed for the temporary sewer has previously been tilled and, therefore, there are not any sensitive resources on site. C. Public Safety As a condition of project approval for the OTC SPA, which EIR-89-11 environmentally reviewed, fire and emergency service were to be provided by private security and fire protection services. The construction and operation of Fire Station No. 6 subsequent to imposition of those conditions removes the need for those previously required services. Initially, the temporary EastLake Fire Station, Fire Station No.6 located at 975 Lane A venue, will serve as the first-in responder to fire and emergency medical calls from the Olympic Training Center. Second-response units will be available from the City Fire Station No. 4 located at Otay Lakes Road and East "H" Street. As previously concluded in SEIR-89-11, City growth management standards for fire service, which target as first-in travel time to sprinklered, special risk sites of 5,7 minutes and a second-in travel time of 8.7 minutes, will be met by the existing stations. D. Biology EIRs 8]-03 (EastLake Planned Community Master EIR), 89-9 (EastLake Ill/Olympic Center General Development Plan/General Plan Amendment EIR), and SEIR 90-12 (Olympic Training Center Boathouse) all previously analyzed biological impacts, in addition to other impacts in accordance with the tiering of environmental analysis encouraged by the CEQA Guidelines. -5- /~,;; c/ EIR-89-11, (OTC SPA Plan) completed in 1990, found that the dominant vegetation on the site was coastal sage scrub (CSS). At the time of the previous environmental assessment, much of the sage scrub vegetation had been disked or otherwise disturbed. The area that would be needed for the shoulders that are required for Wueste Road contains some Coastal Sage. The U. S, Department of Fish and Wildlife has required that the area not be developed (graded) until after the 4D rule is finalized, The finalization of the rule, which is expected on December I, 1993, will allow cities to determine areo:.s of "take", Therefore, as a conditional of this project approval, prior to consideration of any final subdivision or parcel map, issuance of a grading permit, or issuance of a building permit for any portion of the project site, the 4D rule must have been finalized and permission for take obtained (or determined not to be required), or proof of an incidental take permit under Section 7 or Section lOa of the Endangered Species Act, or any other form of approval by the USF&WS relative to the California Gnatcatcher or CSS shall be provided to the Environmental Review Coordinator of the Chula Vista Planning Department. If such permit is not required, written verification to that effect from the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service shall be provided, Any project redesign required in obtaining a Section 7 or lOa permit may require reconsideration by the appropriate City decisionmaking body. Inclusion of this requirement as a condition of project approval will remove the possibility of significant impact. The areas proposed for left turn lanes to the turn-off of Wueste Road into the boathouse entrance and the athletes' entrance that are proposed to be installed later during Phase I are also currently covered with Coastal sage scrub vegetation. This proposed action has been discussed with U.S. Fish and Wildlife as well as the eventual grading of the shoulders. The Service has required the Developer's agreement to revegetate offsite in the area east of Wueste Road shown on the attached exhibit in order to avoid a "take." Specifically, prior to construction of the turn lanes, a detailed revegetation plan must be prepared by Developer and approved by the Service. This is being required as a condition of project approval, Inclusion of this condition of approval will prevent the potential impact becoming significant. -6- / ~~...5 ...J V. CONCLUSION Traffic, sewage, biological and public safety impacts are found to be less than significant and within the acceptable range of LOS C or better in accordance with the City of Chula Vista's General Plan and Growth Management Ordinance, pursuant to Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion. . (' $A) '-..,6'> (Ad CI// I<:; ENVIRONME~AL RE~\v COORD~ATOR REFERENCES General Plan, City of Chula Vista Title 19. Chula Vista Municipal Code City of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures Memorandum to Bill Ullrich from Harold Rosenberg, June 3, 1993, re: Capacity of Wueste Road to Serve the Project EIR-89-11 November 3, 1993. Brief description of temporary sewer system from Roger Bhatia, Rick Engineering October 29, 1993, Letter to Ellen Berryman, U,S. Fish and Wildlife from Laurie McKinley re: OTC SPA Amendment F :\home\planning\otc. add -7- (- J:?b NOV- 9-93 rUE 9:44 US FWS FAX NO, 6194319624 p, 03 ,~ . I ~.., ; J FEET LEGEND CALIFORNIA GNA TCA TCHER TERRITORY BOUNDARY t\\:'\'~ AP-EA TO 8E DISTURBED ~ NOT PAFlT OF CALIFORNIA ~ GNATCATCHEA TERRiTORY (EXISTING eUCALYP;US) NOTE.SCA~E is...,.pqoXIMATE ies at Lower Clay Reservoir :"'~ "I l_ 8 / -r? 7 - OL YMPIC TRAINING CENTER EIR-89-11 CANDIDATE CEQA FINDINGS IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 21081 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT AND SECTION 15091 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATION CODE APRIL 1990 \ 1. INTRODUCTION Section 21081 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that no project shall be approved by a public agency when significant environmental effects have been identified, unless one of the following findings is made and supported by substantial evidence in the record: I) Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR). 2) Changes or alterations are the responsibility of another public agency and not the agency making the fmding. 3) Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. The following findings are made relative to the conclusions of of Final Supplemental EIR 89-11, including the Addendum thereto, for the proposed Olympic Training Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (SCH #89010284) and all documents, maps, and illustrations listed in Section VI of these findings. The project's discretionary action consists of approval of the SPA Plan and its components. Proiect Description The proposed project site encompasses 150 acres of land located west of Lower Otay Reservoir and Wueste Road within the EastLake III Planned Community of Chula Vista, The Olympic Training Center (OTC) SPA Plan proposes the following uses by acreage: FacilitylU ses Acres . OTC Buildings (2 gyms, housing, sports medicine facilities, dining and athletes' support facilities, visitor's center) . Roads 10.57 45.29 77.59 3.52 13.03 150.0 . Athletic Venues . General Open Space . Parking Athletic facilities/venues include gymnasiums for volleyball, basketball, handball; soccer, field hockey, archery, baseball and softball fields; track and field; tennis courts; cycling criterium course; bobsled and luge practice facility; swimming complex; and rowing and canoe/kayaking venue, AtWetes' housing is proposed along the east site area, clustered 1 to house a maximum of 1,000 athletes at buildout. The Sports Medicine/Science facilities and support dining and recreation facilities are proposed adjacent to the athletes' residential area. The Visitor Center is proposed as the main entrance area along Orange Avenue at the site's northern boundary. The OTC will be accessed at two locations: the main entrance at Orange A venue and the secondary/athletes' entrance at Wueste Road. Vehicular use onsite will be limited to those two entrance/parking areas where parking will be provided, Onsite circulation beyond those parking areas will consist of the "Olympic Pathway" extending north-south through the center of the site, upon which pedestrians, bicycles, emergency vehicles and small tour buses will be permitted, No other vehicular use will be allowed, Offsite infrastructure, such as sewer lines, roadway improvements, sewer lift stations and stonn water detentions. will be required for the OTC and other EastLake development These facilities have not yet been designed or precisely located, and will thus require subsequent CEQA review. The OTC Public Facilities Financing Plan, subject to approval subsequent to SPA Plan approval, will ensure that facilities are provided concurrent with need. The OTC will be implemented in two phases. II, CITY OF CHULA VISTA FINDINGS The following findings are applicable to the project as analyzed in the SEIR and to the refinement as presented and analyzed in the Addendum bound with the Final SEIR,. The findings have been prepared pursuant to Sections 15091 of Title 14 of the California Administration Code and Section 21081 of the California Resources Code, 1) The City of Chula Vista, having reviewed and considered the infonnation contained in the Final EIR for the Olympic Training Center SPA Plan and the record, finds that changes have been incorporated into the project which mitigate, avoid, or reduce the level of identified impacts to insignificance or to levels acceptable to the City, by measures identified in the Final Supplemental EIR. 2) The City of Chula Vista having reviewed and considered the infonnation contained in the Final Supplemental EIR and the record, finds that none of the significant environmental effects anticipated as a result of the proposed project are within the responsibility of another public agency except for air quality and water supply and water quality, 3) The City of Chula Vista, having reviewed and considered the infonnation contained in the Final Supplemental EIR and the record. finds that no specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures identified in the EIR. 4) The Planning Conunission acknowledges that these Recommended CEQA Findings are advisory and do not bind the City Council from adopting fmdings to the contrary if they are supported by substantial evidence in the record. The City of Chula Vista's Threshold/Standards, adopted November 17. 1987. were developed to assure that the "quality of life" enjoyed by the City's residents is maintained while growth occurs, That quality of life is also important to those who wish to develop within the City. Implementation of the Threshold/Standards program will assure that significant, adverse impacts are avoided or redl1ced through sound planning and that public services and the quality of the environment will be preserved and enhanced. Based 2 on these threshold/standards, changes have been incorporated into the project to mitigate or avoid environmental effects. The 11 issues addressed in the Threshold/Standards are discussed in Sections m, IV, and V below. III. SIGNIFICANT, UNMITIGABLE IMPACTSIIMPACTS FOUND INFEASffiLE TO MITIGATE TO BELOW A LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE 1) Aesthetics and Visual Resources Impact Development of the Olympic Training Center project will connibute to the incremental impact of ongoing development in the area on the natural aesthetics and visual resources in the Eastern Territories of Chula Vista. Miti!!ation Regarding the OTC, special consideration during subsequent site. design (precise plan) shall be given to areas adjacent to the Lower Otay Lake, Salt Creeh:orridor and other natural open space or sensitive areas (Le" park/open space to the south of OTC, Wueste Road Scenic Corridor), to minimize aesthetic and visual impacts to those areas. to the extent feasible and acceptable to the City Planning Director. Guidelines, concepts and criteria stated in the SPA Plan (approved by the City) shall be adhered to and implemented in accordance with City procedure and review. The OTC proponent shall consider utilization of low-pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lamps in large outdoor areas of the OTC (Le., ball fields). Although not a standard practice throughout the City, LPSV lighting should be utilized as determined desirable and feasible by the City, Special consideration should be given to night-time lighting of sports activities to comply with this request. Consultation with Mt. Palomar and Mt. Laguna observatories may be warranted during future (Le.. site plan) CEQA implementation/documentation to identify and mitigate lighting impacts. Findin!! It is infeasible to mitigate the projects' contributions to the cumulative impact to regional visual resources to below a level of significance. 2) Water Supply ImDact Adequate water supply is a regional and state-wide problem, especially during peak demand periods. All developments, including the Olympic Training Center project, add an incremental increase in the area-wide demand for more imported water. Upon full buildout, the Olympic Training Center is expected to require approximately 0,65 million gallons of water per day of the Otay Water Disnict's ultimate demand, This represents an incremental contribution to the cumulative regional impacts to the area's water supply, Miti!!ation Water conservation measures shall be included into all site design plans for the Olympic Training Center, 3 Prior to issuance of grading pennits, the proponent shall verify that onsite and offsite water facilities proposed shall adequately service the project. via approval (will- serve letter) by the OWD of all plans and specifications, and approval of plans by the City Engineer and, if necessary, the City Fire Marshall. This shall incorporate specifications (based on the Public Facilities Financing Plan) delineating water facility improvements' phasing, costs and construction scheduling in relation to development phasing, Fire hydrants shall be included in plans and be installed, tested and fully operational prior to any placement of combustible materials onsite, Maximum fire hydrant pressure shall not exceed 150 psi. Also. fire sprinkler systems shall be placed in all buildings. Findinl! Significant impacts to the storage and conveyance of water supply will be eliminated or avoided by implementation of mitigation measures provided in these findings and in the Final EIR. The only impact associated with water that cannot be mitigated to below a level of significance is the cumulative impact to regional water supply, (See also Section IV.IO.) 3) Ener~y Supuly Im~act As with any development, the project will contribute to a cumulative increase in demand for non-renewable energy resources. Miti~ation The Olympic Training Cen\er project shall, to the extent feasible and to the satisfaction of the City, provide the following: . Install landscaping that provides afternoon shade, reduces glare, encourages summer breezes, discourages winter breezes; . Construct sufficient overhangs or provide for shading devices on all residential units which would block the summer sun from window areas but allow winter sun; . Limit outdoor lighting after 10 p,m; . Locate deciduous trees in yard spaces adjacent to large windows to block summer sun, but allow winter sun; . Reserve solar access and allow passive energy systems. incorporate bicycle and pedestrian trails to facilitate non-vehicular travel onsite. . Encourage the use of public transit by providing bus-loading zones at key locations throughout the community; . Implement efficient circulation systems with phased traffic control devices; . Minimize reflective and heat absorbing landscapes; . Install energy efficient appliances and lights in residential and non- residential developments; . Use appropriate building design and materials to construct energy-efficient structures, 4 Findin~ Project-specific impacts can be mitigated by the above measures to below a level of significance. It is infeasible to mitigate the cumulative projects' impact on non- renewable energy resources to below a level of significance. IV, SIGNIFICANT. MmGABLE IMPACfS 1) Land Use Impact Potential incompatibility impacts could result between OTC development areas and adjacent open space, Miti!1ation Setbacks, landscaping, building orientation and other buffering measures are required of OTC development, as set forth in the SPA Plan and EIR Section 4,2, . Findin~ All potentially significant land use compatibility impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a level acceptable to the City of Chula Vista by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above, 2) Visual Resources IrT"Ipact Project-specific visual impacts may result due to project grading, especially in areas adjacent to permanent open space (i.e" Salt Creek corridor). Grading and development should be adequately designed or buffered from adjacent open space land uses, Development of the OTC may result in urban intrusion on the viewshed of users of Lower Otay Reservoir, Wueste Road, and that of the nearby regional park. Miti~ation Special consideration during subsequent site design (precise plan) shall be given. to areas adjacent to the Lower Otay Lake. Salt Creek corridor and other natural open space or sensitive areas (i.e" park/open space to the south of OTC, Wueste Road Scenic Corridor), to minimize aesthetic and visual impacts to those areas, to the extent feasible and acceptable to the City Planning Director, Guidelines, concepts and criteria stated in the SPA Plan (approved by the City) shall be adhered to and implemented in accordance with City procedure and review, The OTC proponent shall consider utilization of low-pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lamps in large outdoor areas of the OTC (i,e" ball fields), Although not a standard practice throughout the City. LPSV lighting should be utilized as determined desirable and feasible by the City, Special consideration should be given to night-time lighting of sports activities to comply with this request. Consultation with Mt, Palomar and Mt, Laguna observatories may be warranted during future (i.e,. site plan) CEQA implementation/documentation to identify and mitigate lighting impacts, 5 Findinl! All project-specific significant impacts will be eliminated by vinue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fonh above, 3) Geolo~/Soils Inwact No major geologic constraints to development are known; the potential on site geotechnical constraints include expansive soils, erosion, landslides. seismic activity and liquefiable soils, Miti~ation A detailed subsurface investigation shall be conducted prior to precise plan approval to ensure mitigation of potential impacts, Implementation of sound construction practices, in conformance with existing Building Code standards will mitigate any potential geotechnical and soils effects, Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated by vinue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fonh above. 4) Hydrolo!!V/Water Ouality Impact The OTC development would increase the site's impervious cover over natural conditions, thereby increasing the amount of surface runoff by 15 to 30 percent during large storms, a potentially significant impact. Potential erosion and water quality impacts could be experienced at downstream and adjacent sensitive areas such as Lower Otay Reservoir and Salt Creek. Mitil!ation Plans illustrating drainage flows shall be prepared as detennined by the City and shall be reviewed by the City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, County Flood Control District and owner of the facility, The project applicant may be required. as detennined necessary by the City, to install drainage facilities or to pay for a share of the necessary drainage improvements costs in Telegraph Canyon and Otay River downstream from the project site, Drainage control measures. fees and installation of facilities such as retention basins are required in subsequent. detailed drainage plans for the OTC, which will be reviewed by the City and County Flood Control District. Water quality will be maintained by implementation of measures cited herein, including: review of plans by the RWQCB and County Health Dept.; diversion of runoff; restricted use ofreclaimed'water; installation of subdrains and pad drains; erosion control via landscaping and limited irrigation; and maintenance of drainage devices. 6 Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above, 5) Paleontolo~cal Resources ImDact The site possesses a high potential for paleontological resources, therefore, there is potential for adverse impacts to significant paleontological resources during construction of the Olympic Training Center project. Miti~ation A qualified paleontologist shall monitor grading activities during construction of the project. Salvage of resources or diversion would be required if resources are encountered during grading. Findinl! All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above, 6) Biolol!ical Resources Im~act No direct impacts to biological resources will result from OTC development due to a lack of resources onsite. Offsite adjacent resources of Salt Creek, Otay Reservoir and/or natural open space to the south of the OTC could be secondarily affected by development, and by public facilities and utilities required for development. Mitil!ation Detailed subsequent plans are required to delineate setbacks and buffering along project boundaries, to ensure protection of adjacent and nearby biological resources. Also, mitigation cited in the Hydrology section of the Final EIR will protect resources of the Otay Reservoir, Further subsequent site-specific biological assessment and mitigation are required regarding offsite utility improvements necessary for project implementation. Findinl! All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above, 7) Transportation/Circulation Impact The OTC will generate 4,937 daily trips (ADT) at buildout. Interim impacts in 199 I and 1992 due to the project and other cumulative development have been identified; long-tenn cumulative impacts and TPP improvements were assessed in the EastLake III GDP EIR and results are incorporated herein. 7 Miti~ation Mitigation from the EastLake III General Development Plan (GDP) has been incorporated into this EIR as a portion of the total recommended mitigation, Additional mitigation in this EIR 89-11, to offset cumulative impacts, includes interim 1991 improvements, mitigation required of the Sunbow Project which will effect the OTC area, and further 1995 mitigation and monitoring. These measures are listed below in detail. EastLake III Requirements The following measures are derived from the EastLake III EIR 89-9. as refined in December 1989: . The OTC SPA Plan development shall comply with mitigation improvements of the Transportation Phasing Plan prepared in October 1989 included in the EastLake III EIR 89-9 Section 4,2,3. incorporated by reference herein, Specific project improvements shall be implemented as dictated in the TPP at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer, in coordination with development phasing, In particular, Hunte Parkway between Telegraph Canyon and Orange Avenue should be in place before OTC opening, and Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the OTC Entrance should be in place for OTC opening, Access can also be provided via Wueste Road. Partial improvements are indicated in the OTC SPA Plan, Construction schedules and the OTC fair-share responsibility for improvements' financing shall be detennined by the City Traffic Engineer. . Access roadways and parking areas of the OTC shall be constructed to full recommended standards prior to or concurrent with development . The following traffic control measures and operational improvements are available to further enhance intersection operation and levels of service beyond the levels provided for in the TPP, These mechanisms are recommended by the project traffic engineer to be utilized as necessary, and shall be required as warranted, based upon the discretion of the City traffic engineer and on future monitoring and traffic assessments, 1, Signal timing plans could be adjusted as the traffic volumes change (during peak and off-peak periods) to keep the study area intersections operating at peak efficiency, 2. Signal phasing could be modified to further optimize intersection operations, 3. Double right turn lanes or free right turn lanes could be added to improve intersection Levels of Service. 4. Pedesuian movements could be resuicted or rerouted so that free flow right turns or other critical movements could be made unimpeded (as described in the above measure). 8 Additional Mitigation A, Sunbow Proiect Mitil'ation. Various improvements required of the Sunbow project will alleviate interim (1991) cumulative traffic on roadways utilized by the OTC, The below cumulative traffic improvements will guarantee adequate levels of seIVice are maintained during OTC implementation, . . The following Sunbow 2 Phase I improvements (Increments 2, 3 and pan of 4 of TPP) shall be complete prior to issuance of building permits for any OTC development, at th~ discretion of the City Traffic Engineer, These improvements must be made to allow the 1-8GSrrelegraph Canyon Road Interchange to operate at acceptable levels of seIVice. and the Olympic Training Center shall contribute to these improvements on a fair share basis to the satisfaction of the City. If the Sunbow project does not proceed, required improvements to allow OTC development will be determined by the City Traffic Engineer, I. Widen the north side of Telegraph Canyon Road to provide four (4) westbound travel lanes from the 1-805 northbound on-ram to' a point easterly of Halecrest, with two through lanes and two exclusive right turn lanes. 2, Conduct a feasibility study of the alternatives to improve capacity of the Telegraph Canyon Road at 1-805 northbound ramplHalecrest intersection by removing the signalization at Halecrest and extending the median across the intersection to prohibit left turns. The alternative will include consideration of a new signal at the shopping center's existing driveway east of Halecrest. 3, Improve Telegraph Canyon Road from Paseo del Rey to EastLake Phase 2 (just east of Paseo Ladera) to a six-lane prime anerial roadway. 4, Restripe and widen the 1-805 northbound off ramp to provide two (2) northbound to eastbound right turn lanes, (This improvement had been scheduled for constt1lction by the completion of Phase 3 of Sun bow II but will need to be rescheduled for completion by 1991). . The following Sunbow 2 Phase 2/3 improvements (Increments 5 and 6 of TPP, scheduled for 1993/1994) shall be complete prior to issuance of building permits for the OTC second phase, at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer, If the Sunbow project does not proceed, required improvements to allow OTC development will be determined by the City Traffic Engineer, 1. Install a traffic signal for Telegraph Canyon Road at 1-805 southbound ramp. Improvements shall include the necessary widening of Telegraph Canyon Road and the southbound on/off ramp to accorrunodate the dual left turn lanes on Telegraph Canyon Road to southbound 1-805. 2, Constt1lct an exclusive right turn lane for eastbound traffic at the intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Medical Center Drive and provide overlap signal phasing for this movement (to operate with the northbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement). 9 B, OTC MitiVation/199l Improvements, Beyond the above measures. the following improvements (identified in the December 1989 JHK study) shall be implemented. if and when detennined necessary by the City, and in a time and manner detennined by the City Traffic Engineer (in coordination with TPP improvements and OTC construction), The OTC obligation towards financing and construction of said improvements, and implementation scheduling shall be determined prior to OTC precise plan approval. . Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road Provide overlap signal phasing for southbo~nd right turning vehicles (to operate with the eastbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement). Provide overlap signal phasing for westbound right turn vehicles (to operate with the southbound left turn phase as a simultaneous movement), . Telegraph Canyon Road/EastLake Parkway Provide overlap signal phasing for eastbound right turning vehi~les (to operate with the northbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement), C, Further Miti!!ation, Monitorin!! and 1995 Conditions. . All study area intersections shall be monitored at least annually or more frequently if necessary, to determine if there are any future changes over the currently anticipated volumes and Levels of Service (Monitoring could be in conjunction with the annual TPP update), The data can then be analyzed so that any needed changes to geomettics can be programmed for construction, . The OTC entrance and parking area will have several forms of transit accessing the site. Proper ingress and egress geometric characteristics shall be applied to the local traffic circulation system and site design, to be identified and specified at precise plan review. This includes geometries both on-site and off-site, and provision of adequate drop-off areas for transit vehicles, The precise site plans shall also provide for the safe movement of all pedestrians accessing the site, . If build out of the OTC occurs prior to construction of SR-125, and/or if TPP development/improvements at Increment 6 do not occur as assumed. the following actions shall be conducted prior to the issuance of fmal phase OTC building pennits, at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer, Note that these work efforts may be encompassed in the City's Traffic Monitoring/Transportation Phasing Plan. The OTC, although conttibuting only a small portion of cumulative trips. shall contribute to the following efforts on a fair share basis, if detennined necessary by the City, Reassess traffic conditions at the I-80S/felegraph Canyon Road interchange based on Year 1994 volume conditions, and determine the amount of reserve capacity that is available as a result of the required improvements associated with the Sunbow II development project (Phases 2 and 3) at this interchange, Reassess the capacitylLOS condition of the main access route to the OTC along Telegraph Canyon Road, Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue to 10 determine if additional mitigation beyond that provided by planned improvements is required. A source for this data may be the most recent version of the Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program which analyzes intersection capacity on a city-wide basis at periodic intervals. Actual data collection and analysis to supplement City provided data may be required, . Findin~ rlll significant transpQnation/circulation impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a level acceptable to the City of Chula Vista by vinue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fonh above. 8) Air Oualitv Impacts Traffic generated by the OTC will increase air pollution emissions in \he area, The OTC land uses are not incorporated into regional air quality attainment plans for the San Diego region; the OTC contribution to regional air quality degradation is considered insignificant due to its inclusion in the City's GP Update and few trips generated, Local air quality impacts would exist at "hotspot" intersections (where the intersection level of service is not maintained at an acceptable level, LOS C as defined by the City), Interim and long-term traffic would create such hotspots if not mitigated, Local short-term air quality impacts will result from OTC grading and construction activities, Several criteria air pollutants will occur during construction phases. Miti~ation To minimize regional air quality impacts, the OTC incorporates traffic flow improvements, bicycling and pedestrian circulation, and transit service. No other mitigation to regional air quality impacts has been identified other than the No Project Alternative, Transponation improvements associated with the TPP and additional mitigation required in the EIR will ensure that interim and long-term adequate levels of service are maintained at intersections in the study area. Shon-term emissions and dust can be controlled by standard grading and construction procedures required as mitigation in the Final EIR, Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a level acceptable to the City of Chula Vista by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fonh above. 9) ~ Imuact Potentially significant noise impacts associated with the Olympic Training Center project were calculated using the Federal Highway Administration Stamina 2,0 11 Noise Prediction model. Vehicular-generated noise levels would exceed 65dB(A) in areas adjacent to Orange Avenue, potentially affecting the OTC Visitors Center, Exterior noise levels above 65 dB(A) CNEL are considered incompatible with residential and similar uses, but compatible with commercial uses. The potential need for noise attenuation in buildings in this area would need to be assessed at design stages. . Miti~ation If exterior living areas, residential structures and/or commercial establishments are built within the noise impact area, noise mitigation would be required for exterior ar..i/or interior noise attenuation, as delineated in the Final EIR, Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated by vinue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fom above. 10) Water Service and Distribution Impact Approximately 0,65 million gallons of water per day will be required for the Olympic Training Center, Construction of new facilities will be required to service the project. Miti~ation An agreement between EastLake Development Company and two other major developers has been approved by the OWD Board of Directors, This agreement will provide financing for the construction of a below-ground 50 million gallon reservoir that will provide terminal storage for a minimum of 5 average days water supply, EastLake Development has offered a site for this facility, Water conservation measures shall be incorporated as feasible into all site design in consultation with the Otay Water District. Prior to issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall verify that water facilities proposed shall adequately serve the area via will-serve letter from the Otay Water District. Fire hydrants shall be included in plans and be installed, tested and fully operational prior to any placement of combustible materials onsite. Maximum fire hydrant pressure shall not exceed 150 psi. Also, fire sprinkler systems shall be placed in all buildings, Findin!! All significant impacts to water service facilities will be eliminated by vinue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set fonh above. (See also Section III.2 for Water Suppy Findings) 12 11) Sewer IIT1Pact The OTC would generate about 0.14 million gallons per day of wastewater. Provision of sewer services to the Olympic Training Center would result in potential adverse impacts on the Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer, Facility improvements would be required prior to OTC opening, in conjunction with the EastLake ill Public Facilities Financing Program improvements. Miti~ation An agreement between the developer or project proponent and City for funding and/or construction of on site and offsite (Le., sewer lines and lift stations along Salt Creek) wastewater facilities shall be approved and implemented in accordance with City requirements and scheduling, Said agreement could be incorporated into the Public Facilities Financing Plan and shall be subject to CEQA review prior to issuance of grading permits, The plan or agreement shall identify facilities' location. sizes and configurations, and shall delineate the phasing and fmancing of improvements in relation to development phasing, Development of the OTC may require extension of a sewer trunk line to the site and future upgrading of the existing Telegraph Canyon Sewer Trunk Line to provide additional capacity for users, This facility and the OTC obligation towards improvements shall be implemented in accordance with direction by the City Public Works Depanment. As pan of the EastLake III project approval, cumulative impacts to the City's sewer system will be mitigated by the development of additional facilities to be funded by the EastLake Development Company and other developers. As pan of the EastLake Greens project, EastLake Development Company has negotiated an agreement with the City of Chula Vista. Through this agreement, monitoring will be conducted at EastLake Development's expense to ensure that the capacity of the existing IS-inch sewer trunk line in Telegraph Canyon Road is not exceeded prior to the construction of alternative means to transport such sewage. Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above. 12) Police Protection Impact The Olympic Training Center will be operational prior to full buildout of the sUITOunding area. Private police protection will be required on an interim basis to serve the OTe. Mitigation The following mitigation measures shall be implemented for the Olympic Training Center: 13 a) On an interimlshort-tenn basis, a private security force shall be contracted and utilized to ensure that police protection is available to the Olympic Training Center within the threshold standard. b) The security force shall coordinate with the City to ensure adequate police security, c) Transition from the private secwity force to Police Department service shall occur at the time the City Police Department is able to provide service, Findin~ All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above. 13) Fire Protection/Emer!!ency Medical Services Impact The Olympic Training Center will be operational before the surrounding area is developed. In the near-term, the City will be unable to adequately respond to needs for fire and emergency medical services. The City of Chula Vista has identified a need for improved fire and police communications to serve the Olympic Training Center, Miti~ation Interim fire protection services for the Olympic Training Center shall be provided by properly trained, onsite private or volunteer personnel, subject to approval of the City of Chula Vista Fire Department, prior to occupancy, The Olympic Training Center shall provide medical staff to handle on site medical emergencies, Transition to City emergency medical services shall occur when and if the City Fire Department is able to provide services. Transition to City fire protection and emergency medical services shall occur on a schedule established by the City, Said schedule shall be based on the operation of planned fire stations in the Salt Creek development and in the Otay Ranch area west of the reservoir, as outlined in the City's Fire Station Master Plan, The communications facilities (tower and/or antenna) shall be in place prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy of the Olympic Training Center. Facility requirements shall be detennined by the City. Long-term impacts to fire and emergency medical services shall be mitigated at buildout by fire stations planned for the Salt Creek development and other potential Otay Ranch development west of the Reservoir (City Fire Station Master Plan, 1989). Impact fees (paid per requirements of the City, prior to issuance of building pennits) levied against EastLake III shall provide a portion of the funding for new equipment, personnel and facilities identified in the Master Plan, 14 Prior to precise plan approvals, adequate fire and emergency response times (per City threshold criteria) shall be confirmed via approval by the Chula Vista Fire Department Findinl! All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above. 14) Librarv Services Impact Adequate service cannot be provided by existing facilities.. Miti~ation Prior to issuance of building permits within the GTC SPA Plan .site, a construction schedule for the 1,0 acre site facility (in EastLake I or II) shall be approved by the City and scheduled to serve OTC users on an appropriate implementation schedule. Findinl! All significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above. 15) Public Transit Impact The GTC project will create additional demands for public transit. Mitil!ation SPA Plan development and implementation (both interim and long-term) shall be coordinated with the City and Chula Vista Transit to ensure compatibility will transit plans, routes and schedules, Interim solutions shall be created to serve public transit demands of the OTC until routes exist on or adjacent to the site along Orange Avenue, At site buildout. onsite routes shall be provided, subject to approval of the City and Chula Vista Transit. Future onsite plans (including precise plans) shall delineate bicycle and pedestrian trails onsite, and connection to off-site routes and bus stops, Bikeways shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Caltrans standards; all bikeways, pedestrian routes and other transit routes shall conform to standards set forth in the applicable approved SPA Plan, subject to review and approval by the City, Findinl! All potentially significant impacts will be eliminated by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR and changes incorporated into the project as set forth above. IS V. INSIGNIFICANT IMPACfS In accordance with the evaluation provided in EIR-89- I I and previous documentation, the project would not result in any significant impacts in the issue areas below; these issues have therefore not been discussed above: 1) Archaeological and Historical Resources (Section 4.5 of the EIR) 2) Schools (Section 4.1 0.3 of the EIR) 3) Parks and Recreational Facilities (Section 4.10.6 of the EIR) 4) Solid Waste Disposal (Section 4.10.9 of the EIR) 5) Fiscal Effects (Section 4.12 of the EIR) VI. TIm RECORD For the purposes of CEQA and these findings, the record of the Planning Commission and City Council relating to these actions include the following: 1) Burchell, Robert W. and David Listokin, 1978. The Fiscal Impact Handbook; The Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick. 2) California Air Resources Board (ARB), 1982, 1983, 1984, 1985, Air Quality Data. 3) California Department of Water Resources, 1976, Ground Water Occurrence and Quality, San Diego Region, Bulletin No. 106-2. 4) CIC Research, 1989, The Economic Impact of the New U.S. Olympic Training Center on the San Diego Economy, March 27. 5) Cinti & Associates, 1989, EastLake III Planned Community Zone General Development Plan, January. 6) City of Chula Vista 1989. City of Chula Vista General Plan Update. March. 7) City of Chula Vista, 1982, ChuIa Vista General Plan, EastLake Policy Plan, City Council Resolution No. 10996, September 7. 8) City of Chula Vista, 1987, Revisions to the Master Fee Schedule, June. 9) City ofChula Vista, 1987. Policy: Threshold/Standards and Growth Management Oversight Committee, November. 10) City of Chula Vista, 1989. Chula Vista General Plan. 12) City of Chula Vista, 1989. Municipal Code. 13) County of San Diego, 1984, San Diego County General Plan - 1995, Part II, Regional Land Use Element and Map, August 22. 14) County of San Diego, 1984, San Diego County General Plan - 1995, Part XXIII, Otay Subregional Plan, August 22. 16 15) County of San Diego, 1985, The Zoning Ordinance, San Diego County, November. 16) EastLake Development Company, 1988, Community Development Phasing, May. 17) ERC Environmental, 1989. EastLake Greens SPA Plan and EastLake Trails Pre- zone and Annexation Draft Supplemental EIR, April. 18) Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), 1982. Noise Barrier Cost Reductj,)tt Procedures, Stamina 2.0/0ptima: Users Manual. 19). Greensfelder, R. W., 1974, Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration From Earthquakes In California. 20) JHK & Associates, 1989. Traffic Analysis EastLake III General Development Plan, August. 21) Kennedy, M. P. and Tan, S. S., 1977, Geology of National City, Imperial'Beach, and Otay Mesa Quadrangles, Southern San Diego Metropolitan Area, California. 22) P&D Technologies, Inc., 1989. Draft EIR. City of Chula Vista General Plan Update, March. 23) Powell, BJ. 1989. Planning Engineer, NBS Lowry Engineers. Personal Communication May 18, 1989. 24) Real, C. R., Toppozada, T. R., and Parke, D. L., 1978, Earthquake Epicenter Map of California. 25) San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), 1984, A Housing Study for the City of Chula Vista. 26) San Diego Association of Governments, SANDAG, 1985, Watch in the San Diego Regional, 1985. 27) San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), 1988. Series 7 Forecast. 28) San Diego County Assessor, 1988-89 Secured Property Assessed Valuations. 29) San Diego County Auditor and Controller, 1988-89, Proportionate Increase by Fund. 30) San Diego Geotechnical Consultants, Inc" 1986, Preliminary Soils Investigation, EastLake Greens. 31) San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, RWQCB, 1979, Comprehensive Water Quality Control Plan Report, 1978 Amendments. 32) WESTEC Services, 1982. EastLake Final EIR (#81-03), February, 33) WESTEC Services, 1982. EastLake Final EIR. 17 34) WESTEC Services, Inc. 1979. Environmental Assessment: Miguel to Tijuana Interconnection Project 230 KV Transmission Line. Prepared for San Diego Gas and Electric Co. September. 35) WESTEC Services, Inc. 1980. Jamacha Basin Waste Water Reclairnation Project: Phase II Expansion. Prepared for Otay Municipal Water District. May.' 36) USDA Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California. Alsu included in the record are the following studies prepared for the EastLake Planning Program and Olympic Training Center: 1) Draft EastLake I Planned Community District Regulations, Second Amendment (March 1989). 2) Draft East ChuIa Vista Transportation Phasing Plan (June 1989) 3) EastLake III Planned Community Zone General Development Plan (September 1989) 4) Olympic Training Center SPA Plan (Jan. 1990) Also included as part of the Planning Commission and City Council record are the following: 1) Final Supplernental EIR-89-9 EastLake ill GDP (1989) 2) Documentary and oral evidence presented to the Planning Commission and/or City Council during public hearings on EIR-89-9 and the EastLake ill GDP project. 3) Matters of common knowledge to the Planning Commission and/or City Council, such as and including these and all other formally adopted policies and ordinances: a. The City of Chula Vista General Plan (1970) b. The City of Chu1a Vista Draft General Plan (1989) c. The Zoning Ordinance of the City of ChuIa Vista as most recently amended d. The Municipal Code of the City of ChuIa Vista 18 '- STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS WHEREAS, the California Environmental Quality Act requires that the decision maker in any project balance the benefits of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks in determining whether to approve the project; WHEREAS, the City Council has previ ously found that unavoi dabl e si gnificant cumul ati ve impacts \~oul d be experi enced shoul d the project be approved, namely cumul ative aesthetic and vi sual impacts, cumul ative impacts to water supply and to non-renewable energy resources; NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council resolves that the following project features provide benefits to the City and its citizens justifying the approval of the project notwithstanding the significant cumulative impacts to the water supply, energy resources and the visual and aesthetic impacts described in the Environmental Impact Report. 1. Project approval ensures that processing can proceed on a world class Olympic Training Center to be placed on one hundred fifty (150) acres of land with a market value in excess of thirteen million dollars ($13,000,000.00), and three million dollars ($3,000,000.00) in capital contributions and approximately eight million dollars ($8,000,000.00) in public infrastructure. The provision of a U.S. Olympic Training Center located adjacent to the west of lower Otay Lakes, and the extension of municipal services necessary for the site's operation will bring significant national and international recognition and prestige to the City. 2. As an Olympic Training Center the Property will serve as a magnet for sports organizations, lending a special stature and prestige to the City. 3. As an Olympic Training Center, the property could act as an incubator for various sports-related businesses drawn to locate in the City in order to work with the elite athletes training. 4. The Olympic Training Center will provide the City with a positive fiscal impact by creating permanent jobs at the Olympic Training Center and by inducing other businesses to come to the City to be associated or related to the training of Olympic athletes ~Ihich will create additional jobs in the City. 5. The Olympic Training Center will provide increased sales revenue to the City from the anticipated visitors coming to the Olympic Training Center each year. 6. As an Olympic Training Center, the property will provide significant benefit to local youth of the city by providing positive role models by interfacing with City schools and recreational programs. WPC 7452P OL YMPIC TRAINING CENTER MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Program) is prepared for the City of Chula Vista for the Olympic Training Center (OTC) SPA Plan to comply with AB 3180, which requires public agencies to adopt such programs to ensure effective irnplementation of mitigation measures. This monitoring program is dynamic in that it will undergo changes as additional mitigation measures are identified and additional conditions of approval are placed on the project throughout the project approval process. This Program will serve a dual purpose of verifying completion of the mitigation measures for the proposed project and generating information on the effectiveness of the mitigation measures to guide future decisions. The Program includes the following: . Monitoring team qualifications . Specific monitoring activities . Reporting system . Criteria for evaluating the success of the mitigation rneasures The Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the OTC SPA Plan (EIR 89- 11) addresses potential environmental effects associated with the project. The discretionary action analyzed in the SEIR includes adoption of the OTC SPA Plan by the City of Chula Vista. Approval of the SPA Plan will establish the official development policy of the City of Chula Vista for the OTC. All future discretionary permits related to the OTC SPA Plan implementation will need to be consistent with the OTC SPA Plan and comply with mitigation cited in the SEIR. Future subsequent applications will include precise plans, subdivision (tentative and final) maps, the site plan review process, and grading, drainage, and landscape plan reviews. Many of the mitigation measures in the SEIR will be revised following environmental analysis of these more precise plans; this Program will also be revised at that time. ,/ The SEIR environmental analysis focused on 11 issues which were determined to be potentially significant by the City of Chula Vista. The environmental analysis concluded that the issue areas discussed would avoid significant and potentially significant impacts through implementation of recommended mitigation measures should the proposed project be implemented. The issue areas are land use; aesthetics and visual resources; geology and 1 soils; hydrology/water quality; cultural resources; biological resources; transportation and circuIation; air quality; noise; services and utilities; and fiscal analysis. AB 3180 requires monitoring of only those impacts identified as significant or potentially significant; this Program therefore addresses the recommended mitigation measures for the following impacts: land use; aesthetics and visual resources; geology and soils: hydrology/water quality; cultural resources; biological resources; transportation and circulation; air quality; noise; services and utilities. Per CEQA, fiscal analysis does not require mitigation measures. Because the SEIR does not involve specific development plans and associated onsite development activities, monitoring and reporting will consist of ensuring the identified mitigation measures in the SEIR are implemented throughout the later stages of the project review process. It is anticipated that most monitoring activities will be conducted primarily by City staff under the direction of the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC). This monitoring program discusses the qualifications of aU monitors that may be involved during the development and implementation of the OTC facility. A monitoring team should be identified once the mitigation measures have been adopted by the Chula Vista City Council. Managing the team would be the responsibility of the ERC, who may delegate some if not all of that responsibility to a Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC). The monitoring activities will be accomplished by Environmental Monitors (EMs), Environmental Specialists (ESs), and the MCC. While specific qualifications should be determined by the City of Chula Vista, the monitoring team should possess the foUowing capabilities: . Interpersonal, decision-making, and management skills with demonstrated experience in working under trying field circumstances: . Knowledge of and appreciation for the general environmental attributes and special features found in the project area; . Knowledge of the types of environmental impacts associated with construction of cost-effective mitigation options; and . Excellent communication skills. 2 The responsibilities of the MCC throughout the monitoring effort include the following: . Overall implementation and management of the monitoring program . Quality control of the site-development monitoring team. . Administration and preparation of daily logs, status reports, compliance reports and the final construction monitoring report. . Liaison between the City of Chula Vista, the Olympic Training Center developer and the applicant's contractors. . Monitoring of on site, day-to-day construction activities, including the direction of EMs and ESs in the understanding of all permit conditions, site-specific project requirements, construction schedules and environmental quality control effort. . Ensure contractor knowledge of and compliance with all appropriate permit conditions. . Review of all construction impact mitigations and, if need be, propose additional mitigation. . Have the authority to require correction of activities observed that violate project environmental conditions or that represent unsafe or dangerous conditions. . Maintain prompt and regular communication with the onsite EMs, ESs, and construction personnel responsible for contractor performance and permit compliance. The primary role of the Environmental Monitors is to serve as an extension of the ERC/MCC in performing the quality control functions at the development sites. Their responsibilities and functions are to: a) Maintain a working knowledge of the project permit conditions, contract documents, construction schedules and progress, and any special mitigation requirements for his or her assigned construction area; b) Assist the MCC and construction contractors in coordinating with City ofChula Vista compliance activities; c) Observe construction activities for compliance with the City of Chula Vista penrrritconditions; and 3 d) Provide frequent verbal briefings to the MCC and construction personnel and assist the MCC as necessary in preparing status reports. The primary role of the Environmental Specialists is to provide expertise when environmentally sensitive issues occur throughout the development phases of project implementation, and to provide direction for mitigation. Prior to any project implementation activities, a pre-construction meeting should take place between all the agencies and individuals involved to initiate the Program and establish the responsibility and authority of the participants. Mitigation measures which need to be defined in greater detail will be addressed prior to any project plan approvals in follow-up meetings designed to discuss specific monitoring efforts. Construction activities within the project area should be scheduled each week by the OTC contractor for the following week. At the weekly scheduling meeting, the OTC contractor would distribute a "Three-week Schedule" handout which will identify construction activities, equipment and areas to be worked in for up to three weeks in advance; the primary focus would, however, be on scheduling the following week's activities. Attendees at the meeting would generally include the EMs and/or ESs, various City personnel and the ERC or MCC. By attendance at the meeting and the reference to the work schedule, the ERC or MCC will identify where work is to occur and the commitment of monitoring necessary. An effective reporting system must be established prior to any monitoring efforts. All parties involved must have a clear understanding of the mitigation measures as adopted and these mitigations must be distributed to the participants of the monitoring effort. Those that would have a complete list of all the mitigation measures adopted by the City would include the City of Chula Vista, OTC developer, the MCC and the construction crew supervisor. The MCC would distribute to each Environmental Specialist and Environmental Monitor a specific list of mitigation measures that pertain to his or her monitoring tasks and the appropriate time frame that these mitigations are anticipated to be implemented. In addition to the list of mitigations, the monitors will have Mitigation Monitoring Report (MMR) forms with each mitigation written out on the top of the form. Below the stated mitigation measure, the form will have a series of questions addressing the effectiveness of the mitigation measure. The monitors shall complete the MMR and file it with the MCC following the monitoring activity. The MCC will then include the conclusions of these 4 MMR into an interim and final comprehensive construction report to be submitted to the City of Chu1a Vista. This report will describe the major accomplishments of the Program, summarize problems encountered in achieving the goals of the program, evaluate solutions developed to overcome problems and provide a list of recommendations. for future monitoring programs. In addition and if appropriate, each EM and/or ES will be required to fill out and submit a daily log report to the MCC. The daily log report will be used to record and account for the monitoring activities. Weekly/monthly status reports, as determined appropriate, will be generated from the daily logs and compliance reports and will include supplemental material (i.e., memoranda, telephone logs, letters). This type of feedback is essential for the City of Chula Vista to confirm the implementation and effectiveness of the mitigation measures imposed on the project. There are generally three separate categories of non-compliance associated with the adopted conditions of approval: . Non-compliance requiring an immediate halt to a specific task or piece of equipment. . Infraction that initiates an irnmediate corrective action, No work or task delay. . Infraction that does not warrant immediate corrective action and results in no work or task delay. In all three cases, the MCC would notify the OTC contractor and the City of Chula Vista, and an MMR would be filed with the MCC on a daily basis. There are a number of options the City of Chula Vista may use to enforce this Program should non-compliance continue. Some methods commonly used by other lead agencies include "stop work" orders; fines and penalties (civil); restitution; permit revocations; citations; and injunctions. It is essential that all parties involved in the Program understand the authority and responsibility of the onsite monitors. The following text includes a summary of the project impacts, and a list of all the associated mitigation measures with the monitoring efforts necessary to ensure that the measures are properly implemented incorporated into the measures. All the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR are anticipated to be translated into conditions of project approval. In addition, once the project has been approved and prior to its implementation, the mitigation measures shall be further detailed, 5 LAND USE Summary of Impacts No land use consistency or policy impacts have been identified, i.e., the OTC SPA Plan is consistent with the General Plan and EastLake III GDP. Potential project and cumulative land use compatibility and interface impacts are either insignificant, or can be mitigated to a level of insignificance by adherence to standards identified in the SPA Plan and the measures below, under Aesthetics and Visual Resources. Mitigation Measures Measures to ensure land use compatibility and reduce potential interface impacts are provided below under Aesthetics and Visual Resources. The project's future applications and plans (i.e., precise plan) are subject to SPA Plan consistency review and approval, which will confirm adherence to regulating documents' guidelines, criteria and requirements. No further mitigation is necessary. AESTHETICS AND VISUAL RESOURCES Summary of Impacts The OTC SPA Plan could result in significant aesthetic and visual impacts regarding views from surrounding areas and especially from areas adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir and the Salt Creek corridor. The extensive amount of visual open space, SPA Plan design criteria and the measures below will adequately mitigate OTC project-specific impacts, and will mitigate OTC cumulative impacts to the extent feasible, but not below a level of significance. The OTC SPA Plan, as with any development, would unavoidably contribute to a significant cumulative impact on the existing natural aesthetic and visual character of the area. Mitigation Measures . Regarding the OTC, special consideration during subsequent site design (precise plan) shall be given to areas adjacent to the Lower Otay Lake, Salt 6 Creek corridor and other natural open space or sensitive areas (Le., park/open space to the south of OTC, Wueste Road Scenic Corridor), to minimize aesthetic and visual impacts to those areas to the extent feasible and acceptable to the City Planning Director. Guidelines, concepts and criteria stated in the SPA Plan (as approved by the City) shall be adhered to and implemented in accordance with City procedure and review. . The OTC proponent shall consider utilization of low-pressure sodium vapor (LPSV) lamps in large outdoor areas of the OTC (Le., ball fields). Although not a standard practice throughout the City, LPSV lighting should be utilized as determined desirable and feasible by the City. Special consideration should be given to night-time lighting of sports activities to comply with this request. Consultation with Mt. Palomar and Mt. Laguna observatories may be warranted during furure (i.e., site plan) CEQA implementation/documentation to identify and mitigate lighting impacts. GEOLOGY AND SOILS Summary of Impacts Available geological data suggest that there are no major geologic and soils constraints on the subject site that would preclude development and no unmitigable significant impacts are anticipated. Because geologic constraints often cannot be disclosed by a surface reconnaissance, detailed subsurface investigations are necessary (and required as mitigation) to determine definitively whether constraints are present. The recommendations of the geotechnical report address methods for avoiding significant impacts and/or reducing impacts of the OTC development to an insignificant level. Mitigation Measures . A detailed subsurface soil and engineering geology investigation specifically for the Olympic Training Center SPA Plan shall be conducted to provide grading, foundation, and construction recommendations prior to final project design or precise plan approval. Said investigation will include at a minimum the following: 7 Drilling, logging, and sampling of drill holes to evaluate the bedrock composition and structure; Excavation, logging, and sampling of test pits and trenches in areas of suspected landslides or fauIt traces; I!ullil and laboratory testing of soils to establish engineering characteristics; Preparation of grading specifications and foundation design criteria; Definition of areas where slope buttressing may be required and provide buttress designs; Determination of the relevancy of ground-water conditions in relation to grading and slope stability and provide subdrain requirements; Definition of areas requiring soil removal and recompaction; and Recommendations for seismic design parameters. . The design and construction of buildings shall be in conformance with the 1988 Uniform Building Code, effectively minimizing the hazards of groundshaking on the site. The potential for liquefaction or differential compaction during seismic events which may be found in some of the valley areas of the site can be mitigated or eliminated by following recommendations provided by the required geotechnical investigation. . Areas found to contain ancient landslides during future geotechnical investigations shall be stabilized by buttressing and subdrain installation or be removed and recompacted during grading operations. If landslide masses that are too large to be stabilized are found in future investigations, they should be designated for open space use. . The upper layers of the surficial soils shall be removed to a depth of 2-3 feet during initial construction periods, utilizing conventional grading procedures and replacing with competent compacted fill, in accordance with City grading procedures. . Construction site erosion shall be lessened through erosion control measures, maintaining vegetative buffers, and timely planning of denudation to avoid peak rainy seasons. 8 HYDROLOGy/WATER QUALITY Surface Drainal!e Summary of Impacts Development of the proposed project would increase peak runoff compared to agricultural use of the site. This increase could significantly affect downstream drainage facilities which are currently experiencing flooding problems. The use of retention basins to control peak runoff discharge and implementation of the mitigation measures described below can reduce potentially significant project and cumulative hydrological impacts from OTC implementation to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measures Without detailed site development plans, site-specific measures cannot be identified at this time. The following measures generally require approval of future plans, to ensure flooding protection and other similar mitigation (see also measures for water quality mitigation on the following pages): . Specific project plans (i.e., precise plans, site plans) shall be subject to review and approval of the City of Chula Vista Engineering Department and the County of San Diego Flood Control District. At that time, construction of retention basins may be required offsite and/or on site to ensure that post-development peak runoff discharges from the site do not exceed predevelopment levels. . The project applicant may be required, as determined necessary by the City, to install drainage facilities or pay for a share of the necessary drainage improvement costs in Otay River and/or other applicable areas downstream from the project site. . At the time of preparation of detailed design and engineering plans for the OTC and prior to approval of the project precise plan, a detailed hydrological analysis shall be conducted to determine the size, capacity, alignment, and design of any flood control facilities necessary to protect the OTC site from a 50-year storm 9 flow and to mitigate the downstream impacts of any increased rate of runoff from the site. Water Onalitv Summary of Impacts Development of the project site as proposed could have a significant impact on the water quality of sensitive areas in and surrounding the Otay Reservoir and Salt Creek. Implementation of the mitigation measures below will mitigate impacts to below a level of significance. If a wastewater reclamation program is developed, it would be subject to approval and monitoring by the RWQCB. Disposal of the treated effluent may be restricted along the eastern margin of the property which drains into Otay Lakes. Mitigation Measures Surface and Subsurface Drainage . Specific project drainage plans (prepared concurrently with precise plans or as determined appropriate by the City Engineer), for surface drainage into Otay Lakes and the wastewater reclamation program shall be subject to review and approval by the RWQCB and the County Health Department At that time, the project applicant may be required to divert all surface runoff from developed areas away from the Otay Reservoir and to restrict the use of wastewater for irrigation on the slopes draining into the reservoir. Verification of adherence to this measure shall be obtained prior to precise plan approvals. . Surface runoff into downslope natural areas and graded areas shall be minimized to the extent feasible, as determined satisfactory by the City Public Works Department. Where possible, drainage should be directed to suitable disposal areas via nonerosive devices (i.e., paved swales and storm drains). . Pad drainage shall be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For earth areas, a minimum gradient of two percent shall be maintained and drainage shall be directed toward approved swales or drainage facilities. Drainage patterns approved at 10 the time of fine grading should be maintained throughout the life of proposed structures. . Subdrains shall be placed under all fill locations in existing drainage courses at identified or potential seepage areas. Specific locations will be evaluated in the field during grading with general subdrain locations indicated on the approved grading plan. The subdrain installation shall be inspected and approved by the engineering geologist prior to fill placemen t. Drainage devices are recommended behind stabilization fills to minimize the build-up of hydrostatic and/or seepage forces. Erosion Control . Slopes shall be planted immediately following grading with appropriate drought-resistant vegetation as recommended by a landscape architect. Slopes should not be over-irrigated; heavy groundcover combined with over-watering is a primary source of surficial slope failures. Timer-controlled irrigation should be altered during the rainy season. Erosion control and drainage devices shall be installed in compliance with the requirements of the City of Chula Vista. Maintenance of Drainage Devices . Graded berms, swales, area drains, and slopes are designed to carry surface water from pad areas and shall not be blocked or destroyed, Water shall not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or over top and flow down graded or natural slopes. . Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes, drains, or swimming pools, shall be immediately repaired upon identification. . Devices constructed to drain and protect slopes, including brow ditches, berms, retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and down drains shall be maintained regularly, and, in particular, shall not be allowed to clog so that water can flow unchecked over slope faces. Subdrain outlets will be maintained to prevent burial or other blockage. 11 Groundwater Summary of Impacts Potential impacts will be mitigated by measures cited above under Water Quality (Surface and Subsurface Drainage). Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures beyond those cited above under Water Quality (Surface and Subsurface Drainage) are necessary. CULTURAL RESOURCES Summary of Impacts No impacts to historical/archaeological resources have been identified. Implementation of the following mitigation measures will mitigate potential paleontological impacts to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measures . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the developer or project proponent shall present a letter to the City of Chula Vista indicating that a qualified paleontologist has been retained to carry out the resource mitigation. (A qualified paleontologist is defined as an individual with an M.S. or Ph.D. in paleontology or geology who is familiar with paleontological procedures and techniques.) . A qualified paleontologist shall be at the pregrade meeting to consult with the grading and excavation contractors. . A paleontological monitor shall be onsite at all times during the original cutting of previously undisturbed sediments of the Otay Formation to inspect cuts for contained fossils. The Sweetwater Formation should be monitored on a half- 12 time basis. (The areal distribution of these formations is summarized on the geological map of Kuper 1977.) (A paleontological rnonitor is defined as an individual who has experience in the collection and salvage of fossil materials. The paleontological monitor should work under the direction of a qualified paleontologist.) . When fossils are discovered, the paleontologist (or paleontological monitor) shall be allowed to temporarily direct, divert, or halt grading to allow recovery of fossil remains in a timely manner. Because of the potential for the recovering of small fossil remains such as isolated mammal teeth, it may be necessary to set up a screen-washing operation on the site. . Fossil remains collected during the paleontological salvage program shall be cleaned, sorted, and cataloged and then with the owner's permission, deposited in a scientific institution with paleontological collections such as the San Diego Natural History Museum. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Summary of Impacts Potential secondary project and cumulative impacts to biological resource areas adjacent to the project and/or resulting from offsite infrastructure improvements required of the project, can be mitigated by the measures below. No significant onsite impacts will result from project implementation. Mitigation Measures . For any subsequent precise plan applications within OTC boundaries adjacent to offsite open space parcels, a plan delineating setbacks, screening with native plants and other techniques shall be prepared to ensure adequate buffer along project edges adjacent to sensitive or important biological resource areas (i.e., parkland or open space to south of OTC; Salt Creek corridor to the west; Otay Reservoir to east). Said plan shall be devised during site design/precise plan stages, and shall specify setbacks in minimum feet, plant species, revegetation 13 techniques, and other measures. The plan shall be approved by the City prior to or concurrent with precise plan approval. . Detailed site-specific plans for offsite infrastructure/utility improvements (as generally located in Figure I) shall be subject to CEQA review, and specifically to subsequent biological assessment. Said biological assessment shall be a follow-up to the original survey conducted for the EastLake Master EIR, and shall evaluate specific precise plan/infrastructure plan impacts, prior to precise plan approval for the OTC. Mitigation shall incorporate monitoring and adherence to other agency permining procedures, if applicable (i.e., U.S. Army Corps 404 process, CDFG 1601/3 process). TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION Summary of Impacts Significant impacts have been identified for 1991 cumulative traffic (with or without the OTC) without mitigation. These cumulative impacts from existing traffic, project traffic and cumulative development traffic can be mitigated by circulation improvements of the City Eastern Territories TPP and other mitigation identified in the OTC SPA Plan EIR and in E1R 89-9. Similarly, 1995 and long-term cumulative impacts can be mitigated to acceptable levels, within City Threshold Standards. So long as the recommended roadway improvements are formulated, accepted, constructed and monitored by the City at future planning stages, all project and cumulative impacts will be mitigated to an acceptable level. Mitigation Measures EastLake III Reauirements The following measures are derived from the EastLake III EIR 89-9, as refined in December 1989: . The OTC SPA Plan development shall comply with mitigation improvements of the Transportation Phasing Plan prepared in October 1989 included in the EastLake III EIR 89-9 Section 4.2.3. Specific project improvements shall be implemented as dictated in the TPP at the discretion of the City Traffic 14 ____u____________ h ! j~ ! ,- I :0:.......- I ,.-" .-- .-- Q 0 2000 FEET LEGEND . . - SEWER FORCE MAIN UN E rIlJJIJ STORMWATER DETENTION SITES ORANGE AVENUE SOURCE. Clnll & AssooaJes 1989 - ERC ...:J En....ironmental and Enel'1:J Service<; Cu. SPECIAL STUDY AREAS @ CD MAXIMUM 6 ACRES MH RESIDENTIAL; 10 ACRES COMMERCIAL RETAIL MAXIMUM 15 ACRES COMMERCIAL - , ' : \ '-;, ~/ If L /...../ ~ J (L_j) /' ,- j- \ , "'"' '" ".-_/-- ""-- \.. J1r--" ~ ----. , ~..... _/~/ --/:/" / /' :/ , STORMWATER DENTENTION SITES / EAST LAKE --/ VISTAS I' . - .-- 01'5 Spa Plan location F....ounEs ~\ ~. (/1\ ",' ,,\ c. . 0' -\\ ..' <:) \ -.' ~\ (/1. \ \ ,,~-~,.. .,,' / '-. , ~ '- \ _---0' c-.. IES! ~.. s.:- I..HSI,__ (OTI ~T'_Fao:_ PARK! OPEN SPACE Offslte Infrastructure Improvements FIG l' R E ~] Engineer, in coordination with development phasing. In particular, it is important to OTC implementation that Hunte Parkway between Telegraph Canyon and Orange Avenue be in place before OTC opening, and that Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to the OTC entrance be in place for OTC opening. Access can also be provided via Wueste Road. Construction schedules and financing shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. . Access roadways and parking areas of the OTC shall be constructed to full recommended standards prior to or concurrent with development of each parcel. . The following traffic control measures and operational improvements are available to further enhance intersection operation and levels of service beyond the levels provided for in the TPP. These mechanisms are recommended by the project traffic engineer to be utilized as necessary, and shall be required as warranted, based upon the discretion of the City traffic engineer and on future monitoring and traffic assessments. 1. Signal timing plans could be adjusted as the traffic volumes change (during peak and off-peak periods) to keep the study area intersections operating at peak efficiency. 2. Signal phasing could be modified to further optimize intersection operations. 3. Double right turn lanes or free right turn lanes could be added to improve intersection Levels of Service. 4. Pedestrian movements could be restricted or rerouted so that free flow right turns or other critical movements could be made unimpeded (as described in the above measure). Other Miti!;ation A. Sunbow Proiect Miti!!ation. Various improvements required of the Sunbow project will alleviate interim (1991) cumulative traffic on roadways utilized by the OTC. The 15 following cumulative traffic improvements will guarantee adequate levels of service are maintained during OTC implementation. . The following Sunbow 2 Phase 1 improvements (Increments 2, 3 and part of 4 of the TPP) shall be complete prior to issuance of building permits for any OTC development, at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer. These improvements must be made to allow the I-805/Telegraph Canyon Road Interchange to operate at acceptable levels of service, and the Olympic Training Center shall contribute to these improvements on a fair share basis to the satisifaction of the City. If the Sunbow project does not proceed, required improvements to allow OTC development will be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. I) Widen the north side of Telegraph Canyon Road to provide four westbound travel lanes from the 1-805 northbound on-ramp to a point east of Halecrest, with two through lanes and two exclusive right turn lanes. 2) Conduct a feasibility study of the alternatives to improve capacity of the Telegraph Canyon Road at 1-805 northbound ramplHalecrest intersection by removing the signalization at Halecrest and extending the median across the intersection to prohibit left tums. The alternative will include consideration of a new signal at the shopping center's existing driveway east of Halecrest. 3) Improve Telegraph Canyon Road from Paseo del Rey to EastLake Phase 2 (just east of Paseo Ladera) to a six-lane prime arterial roadway. 4) Restripe and widen the 1-805 northbound off ramp to provide two northbound to eastbound right turn lanes. (This improvement had been scheduled for construction by the completion of Phase 3 of Sunbow II but wilJ need to be rescheduled for completion by 1991.) . The following Sunbow 2 Phase 2/3 improvements (Increments 5 and 6 of TPP, scheduled for 199311994) shall be complete prior to issuance of building permits for the OTC second phase, at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer. If the Sunbow project does not proceed, required improvements to allow OTC development will be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. 16 1) Install a traffic signal for Telegraph Canyon Road at 1-805 southbound ramp. Improvements shall include the necessary widening of Telegraph Canyon Road and the southbound on/off ramp to accommodate the dual left turn lanes on Telegraph Canyon Road to southbound 1-805. 2) Construct an exclusive right turn lane for eastbound traffic at the intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Medical Center Drive and provide overlap signal phasing for this movement (to operate with the northbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement). B. OTC Miti\!ation/1991 Improvements. Beyond the above measures, the following improvements (identified in the December 1989 JHK study) shall be implemented, if and when determined necessary by the City, and in a time and manner determined by the City Traffic Engineer and in coordination with TPP improvements and OTC construction. The OTC obligation towards financing and construction of said improvements, and implementation scheduling shall be determined prior to OTC precise plan approval. . Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road 1) Provide overlap signal phasing for southbound right turning vehicles (to operate with the eastbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement). 2) Provide overlap signal phasing for westbound right turn vehicles (to operate with the southbound left turn phase as a simultaneous movement). . Telegraph Canyon Road/EastLake Parkway 1) Provide overlap signal phasing for eastbound right turning vehicles (to operate with the northbound left turn green phase as a simultaneous movement). C. Additional Miti\!ation. Monitorin~ and 1995 Conditions. . All study area intersections shall be monitored at least annually, or more frequently if necessary, to determine if there are any future changes over the 17 currently anticipated volumes and Levels of Service (Monitoring could be in conjunction with the annual TPP update). Analysis of the data will result in identification of any needed changes to geometrics that can be programmed for construction. . The OTC entrance and parking area will have several forms of transit accessing the site, Proper ingress and egress geometric characteristics shall be applied to the local traffic circulation system and site design, to be identified and specified at precise plan review. This includes geometrics both on- and offsite, and provision of adequate drop-off areas for transit vehicles. The precise site plans shall also provide for the safe movement of all pedestrians accessing the site. . If buildout of the OTC occurs prior to construction of SR-125 and/or if TPP development/improvements at Increment 6 do not occur as assumed, the following actions shall be conducted prior to the issuance of final phase OTC building permits, at the discretion of the City Traffic Engineer. Note that these work efforts may be encompassed in the City"s Traffic Monitoring/Transportation Phasing Plan. The OTC, although contributing only a small portion of cumulative trips, shall contribute to the following efforts on a fair share basis, if determined necessary by the City. I) Reassess traffic conditions at the I-805/Telegraph Canyon Road interchange based on Year 1994 volume conditions, and determine the amount of reserve capacity that is available as a result of the required improvements associated with the Sunbow II development project (Phases 2 and 3) at this interchange, 2) Reassess the capacitylLOS condition of the main access route to the OTC along Telegraph Canyon Road, Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue to determine if additional mitigation beyond that provided by planned improvements is required. A source for this data may be the most recent version of the Growth Management Plan Traffic Monitoring Program which analyzes intersection capacity on a city-wide basis at periodic intervals. Actual data collection and analysis to supplement City provided data may be required. 18 AIR QUALITY Summary of Impacts The proposed OTC would represent growth that was not considered when formulating the air quality attainment plans for the San Diego region. The OTC was approved in the GP Update in July 1989 and, further, would not generate a significant amount of vehicular trips as compared to the previous residential and open spaces designated on the previous General Plan. Also, the project incorporates traffic flow improvements, transit service and bicycling and pedestrian routes, which will serve to minimize vehicular emissions. The OTC therefore does not represent a significant impact to regional air quality. Local long-term air quality impacts can be mitigated to a level below significance by implementation of mitigation measures that ensure a Level of Service C or better at intersections in the area, Short-term local construction-related air quality impacts can also be mitigated by proper construction procedures cited above. Mitigation Measures Although not considered a significant impact, the project will contribute air pollution emissions to the region's air quality. There are four basic tactics for the mitigation of regional air quality presented as part of San Diego's attainment plans (APCD 1986). These are traffic flow improvements, ridesharing, bicycling, and transit. The OTC incorporates traffic flow improvements (e.g., road construction, road widening and signalization), bicycling routes, pedestrian circulation, and transit service. Further, intersections affected by the project would be maintained at Levels of Service C or better, mitigating potential local air quality impacts. No further mitigation is considered necessary to mitigate long- term impacts. The following measures shall be adhered to, subject to approval by the City, to reduce short-term pollutant emissions: . Watering or other dust palliatives to reduce fugitive dust shall be used; emissions reductions of about 50 percent can be realized by implementation of these measures. 19 . Disturbed areas shall be hydroseeded, landscaped, or developed as soon as possible to reduce dust generation. . Trucks hauling fIll material shall be properly covered. . A 20 mile-per-hour speed limit shall be enforced on unpaved surfaces. . Heavy-duty construction equipment that is equipped with modified combustion/fuel injection systems for emissions control shall be utilized. NOISE Summary of Impacts Implementation of the measures below will mitigate protential project and cumulative noise impacts on the OTC site to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measures If exterior living areas, residential facilities along Orange Avenue, and/or commercial establishments are built within the noise impact area, noise mitigation will be required. Methods for mitigating impacts to below a level of significance are descibed below. . Exterior: The rnost effective method of exterior noise mitigation due to vehicular traffic is setbacks. When setbacks are not feasible, mitigation can be acheived by constructing a wall or berm, or a combination of both between the roadway and the impacted land use. Once detailed precise plans are presented for the ore (including grading plans and location of buildings), an additional acoustical analysis shall specifically quantify noise impacts, if development is within the noise impact area. The noise modeling of future noise conditions shall be used to determine the required height and effectivness of walls and/or berms in reducing noise exposure to acceptable levels. . Interior: If determined necessary as described above, potentially significant interior noise impacts for facilities along Orange A venue can be mitigated by reducing the exterior noise levels to below 60 dB CNEL as described above. If 20 not feasible (e.g., second floors) or desirable, a detailed site-specific structural acoustical analysis shall be performed and approved by the City prior to building plan approval to determine interior noise levels and to identify mitigation to ensure that the interior noise levels are below 45 dB CNEL. In general, a closed window condition and mechanical ventiltion will provide the necessary mitigation, SERVICES/UTILITIES Water Availabilitv Summary of Impacts The proposed project would increase water demand at the project site and place an additional burden on water service infrastructure within the Otay Water District (OWD). These changes would not represent a significant impact to the local water distribution system if construction of proposed new facilities, as required, coincides with the anticipated development. The proposed project would incrementally increase regional water consumption. Implementation of water conservation measures and use of reclaimed water will reduce this impact. Nevertheless, the project must be considered cumulatively significant until a solution is found to the regional problem of lirnited water supply during dry weather periods. Final determination of the significance of the proposed project on water availability must be made by the provision of a service availability letter from the Otay Water District at later stages of planning and project implementation. Mitigation Measures . Water conservation measures shall be incorporated as feasible into all site design during precise plan stages and in consultation with the OWD. Measures shall include use and specification of amount, type and distribution of reclaimed water, maintenance of minimum water pressure levels within residential units; incorporation of drought-tolerant vegetation and naturalized landscaping; and use of low flow and water-efficient plumbing. 21 . Prior to issuance of grading permits, the proponent shall verify that onsite and offsite water facilities proposed shall adequately service the project, via approval (will-serve letter) by the OWD of all plans and specifications, and approval of plans by the City Engineer and, if necessary, the City Fire Marshall. This shall incorporate specifications (based on the Public Facilities Financing Plan) delineating water facility improvements' phasing, costs and construction scheduling in relation to development phasing. Additional Measures: . Fire hydrants shall be included in plans and be installed, tested and fully operational prior to any placement of combustible materials onsite. Maximum fire hydrant pressure shall not exceed 150 psi. Fire sprinkler systems shall be placed in all buildings. Sewer Service Summary of Impacts Development of the OTC SPA Plan, without improvements, would present significant sewage impacts due to lack of existing capacity. Construction of additional sewage facilities and provision of treatment capacity as required below would mitigate project specific and cumulative impacts to a level of insignificance. Mitigation Measures . An agreement between the developer or project proponent and City for funding and/or construction of onsite and offsite (i.e., sewer lines and lift stations in Salt Creek) wastewater facilities shall be approved and implemented in accordance with City requirements and scheduling. Said agreement could be incorporated into the Public Facilities Financing Plan and shall be subject to CEQA review prior to issuance of grading permits. The plan or agreement shall identify facilities' location, sizes and configurations, and shall delineate the phasing and financing of improvements in relation to development phasing. 22 . Development of the OTC will require extension of a sewer trunk line to the site and future upgrading of the existing Telegraph Canyon Sewer Trunk Line to provide additional capacity for users. This facility shall be implemented in accordance with direction by the City Public Works Department. Educational Facilities Summary of Impacts Implementation of the EastLake Mello-Roos CFD financing program will mitigate project and cumulative impacts to school facilities and services to below a level of significance. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is necessary. Police Protection Summary of Impacts Impacts to the increased demand for provision of police services will be mitigated to a level of insignificance by the mitigation measures below. No further or cumulative impacts are anticipated. Mitigation Measures . On an interim/short-term basis, a private security force shall be contracted and utilized to ensure that police protection is available to the OTC within the threshold standard. . The security force shall coordinate with the City to ensure adequate police security. . Transition from the private security force to Police Department service shall occur at the time the City Police Department is able to provide service. 23 Fire Protection and Emer!!encv Medical Service Summary of Impacts Impacts to the provision of fIre protection and emergency medical services will be mitigated to a level of insignificance by implementation of the measures below and with funding provided by impact fees. No further project or cumulative impacts have been identified. Mitigation Measures . Interim fire protection services for the OTC shall be provided by properly trained, on site private or volunteer personnel, subject to approval by the City prior to certificates of use and occupancy. In addition to an on site fire brigade, the City's Fire Prevention Bureau shall assess the need for other mitigation, such as sprinklers. All requirements will be outlined in the Interim Fire and Emergency Medical Service Agreement, which will be approved by the City prior to occupancy. . The OTC shall provide medical staff as outlined in the final Fire and Emegency Medical Service Agreement to handle onsite medical emergencies, subject to training and/or approval by the City Fire Department, prior to certificates of use and occupancy. . Transition to City fIre protection and emergency medical services shall occur on a schedule established by the City. Said schedule shall be based on the operation of planned IlI'e stations in the Salt Creek development and in the Gray Ranch area west of the reservoir, as outlined in the City's Fire Station Master Plan. . Communication facilities (tower and/or antenna) shall be in place prior to the issuance of certificates of use and occupancy for the Olympic Training Center, at the discretion of the City. The facilities could be located at the Olympic Training Center or in the EastLake I or EastLake Greens development. Facility requirements shall be determined by the City, generally proposed at this time as a site at an elevation of 600-800 feet, with access to power and appropriate security. 24 . Long-term impacts to fIre and emergency medical services shall be mitigated at buildout by fIre stations planned for the Salt Creek development and other potential Otay Ranch development west of the Reservoir (City Fire Station Master Plan 1989). Impact fees (paid per requirements of the City, prior to issuance of building permits) levied against EastLake III shall provide a portion of the funding for new equipment, personnel and facilities identified in the Master Plan. . Prior to precise plan approvals, adequate fire and emergency response times (per City threshold criteria) shall be confirmed via approval by the Chula Vista Fire Department. Parks and Recreation Facilities Summary of Impacts Implementation of the OTC SPA Plan will create no project or cumulative impacts to parks and recreational facilities or services in the area. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are necessary. Librarv Services Summary of Impacts The potential impact on library facilities will be eliminated by implementation of the measure below. Mitigation Measures Mitigation of library impacts is ensured by the EastLake I and II Public Facility Financing Plan. To guarantee appropriate implementation of the library in relation to OTC occupancy, the following is incorporated from E1R 89-9: 2S . Prior to issuance of building permits within the OTC SPA Plan site, a construction schedule for the 1.0 acre site facility (in EastLake lor II) shall be approved by the City and scheduled to serve OTC users on an appropriate implementation schedule. Ener!!V SUDDlv and Conservation Summary of Impacts Estimated project specific energy demand would not create significant impacts. The incorporation of energy-conserving measures into the project design could result in lower energy consumption demands. The project, as with any development, will unavoidably contribute to a cumulative impact on non-renewable energy resources in the region. Mitigation Measures Although no project~specific adverse impacts to energy supply are anticipated as a result of OTC project implementation, the following energy conservation mitigation measures (incorporated from ErR 89-9) shall be implemented as part of the project to reduce the project's contribution to the cumulative impact from future energy consumption: . Install landscaping that provides afternoon shade, reduces glare, encourages summer breezes, discourages winter breezes; . Construct sufficient overhangs or provide for shading devices on all residential units which would block the sumrner sun from window areas but allow winter sun; . Limit outdoor lighting after 10 p,m; . Locate deciduous trees in yard spaces adjacent to large windows to block summer sun, but allow winter sun; . Reserve solar access and allow passive energy systems, incorporate bicycle and pedestrian trails to facilitate non-vehicular travel on site. . Encouraging the use of public transit by providing bus-loading zones at key locations throughout the community; . Implementing efficient circulation systems with phased traffic control devices; . Minimizing reflective and heat absorbing landscapes; 26 . Installing energy efficient appliances and lights in residential and non-residential developments; . Using appropriate building design and materials to construct energy-efficient structures, Solid Waste DisDosal Summary of Impacts No solid waste impacts are anticipated. The project's contribution to cumulative solid waste impacts in the region is less than significant and can be offset by the County's plans for increased future landfill capacity. Mitigation Measures No measures are necessary. Public Transit Summary of Impacts The above measures will mitigate potential project and cumulative public transit impacts to a level below significance. Mitigation Measures . SPA Plan development and implementation (both interim and long-term) shall be coordinated with the City and Chula Vista Transit to ensure compatibility with transit plans, routes and schedules. Interim solutions shall be created to serve public transit demands of the OTC until routes exist on or adjacent to the site along Orange A venue. At site buildout, on site routes shall be provided, subject to approval of the City and Chula Vista Transit. . Future onsite plans (including precise plans) shall delineate bicycle and pedestrian trails onsite, and connection to offsite routes and bus stops. Bikeways shall be designed and constructed in accordance with Caltrans 27 standards; all bikeways, pedestrian routes and other transit routes shall conform to standards set forth in the applicable approved SPA Plan, subject to review and approval by the City. FISCAL ANALYSIS Summary of Impacts The OTC is expected to have a positive fiscal impact on the City. This is not an adverse environmental impact and therefore neither mitigation nor findings pursuant to CEQA are required. Mitigation Measures No mitigation is necessary. 28 , ." ruE C . OP CH\1u" VISTA DISCLOSURE ST '1lMENT " . YOIi are required to Ole . Slat~mcn\ or Di'clo~urc of cenain ownership or (lnanclal Intcr65ts, paymenu. or campalln ,f conlrlhulloa5. on alt matlef'6 which will require discretionary IClI01I on ttle pari of tbe City Council. J'lannb'l& ~IOII, and all olher oUIelal bodlca. The .Jollow.IDg lnformallDl! mlUl be dif,closcd: 1. .. 1. . Ustlhe nam65 of all pC1'S01ll1lavi1\g a ftnalldalln1'c:rest IDthe propeny -..bleh is Ihnabjor::l OU"'''ppUCllUoe M1be contract. e.g.. owner, applicant, amtraclor, subcontractor. material supplier. San Diego National Sports Training Foundation United States Olympic Committee Koll Construction ,.rt, #".',,. .. ~ ,. ._.--~ .~ ..' :3. ..' 2. Ira1lJ~~ ldaWiied pur,usnl to (t) above is I oorpot&Hon or p*nDerr.l!lp, us, the names or all llIC1MdtIIk ownlna 1IIOIe tJaa,t~ .tlac-shairc.\ in Ihe :orporation or (llj,mg U7l'attDmIIIp:tDJaal ill IIIe fII"A~.- ~ ' ':. ". ,. "....~.'...- .' .' ,. 3. If any penon> Identified pursuant to (1) above I~ no~'pronl organization Dr a trla!I, list the namea or any person serving as dir~tor of Ihe non-profit organization or as trustee or benenciary or truslor or the trust. San Diego National Spor~s Training Foundation Membership Board (attached) ; ..-- .-. ..... . .-..' --, ~ Un~tedStates Olympic Committee Board Membership (attached) ., ._,-. . .......... - ". . ... .' " .. --- - '. 4. . Have you had more lhan S2SQ'Wonhot husmcSHranSotClOO wilh any member of the City ~1Iff. BOII'd5.07mmllatona, _ "'" . ..' .~. o.unJllc:ca, and CouQQI ...,lIlin the pat( twelve moIIl hs?yelO_ No-,- If yes, pluse IDdJgIe fOCIII.aCs); s. Please Idcnlil')' each and every person, Including any agenls, employaea, consultants, or Independent conlractOn wIIo you havc assianed 10 rcpreocnt you berore the City in this mailer. David Armstrong, Exec. Vice President - Sports Training Foundation '. ..,-_... -,. .. -.--- Bill Mi~ler, Project Manager ....-.. -. Laurie McKinley 6. ' .' H1'\Ie you a'ld/or )'OlIr OmttTS or agcnu, In the aweglte, contr1battd more 11\an 'S1 ,I!OO 10' a t:ounctiinem~ '" the current or preceding election period? Ycs_ No_ IC yes, state which Couneilmember(s): Laurie J. McKinley Print or Iype name or contractor/applicant Date: 8-10-93 . O:r.mu U tkfi"nllU: "All)' itld/vidual, Ii"" td,pD11ttn'mip, low ~llUrt. lUJocitltiOfl. IDClaJ club,ft'd't.TflJlf orplUz4tion., ctNf'O"t'dtllt., UUllt, '"'" N<<Iwt, '>fUUt'd1t, rIIU "'''' "'ry oN .mu~. dry a,'" 'OUII/I)I, 'fry ..w.leipaW)', di.m1,. D' 0<11", p.lideallUbdJ......' '" "',)' oW< ""up DI CDl,u,iJl4/IO/I Dtw., '" . 1111/1." SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION Officers and Executive Committee Gloria D. McColl, President C. Terry Brown, Vice President Malin Burnham, Vice President Robert J. Watkins, Secretary Ron L. Fowler, Treasurer Neil E. Derrough D. Jay Flood Peter J. Hall Charlie Jackson Hebert G. Klein David B. Kuhn, Jf. Trustees John C. Argue William Campbell Jack W. Davis Stephen J. Giovanisci Harvey W. Schiller National Board Eugene J. Barone Nicholas B. Binkley Lodwick M. Cook Daniel J. Epstein Anne L. Evans Dennis F. Holt Thomas C. Kravis Daniel D. "Ron" Lane Sol Lizerbram Edwin Moses Carl E. Reichardt Harold B. Sadler Donald F. Sammis J. Stacey Sullivan James H. West Henry S. Williams Walter J. Zable UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE U.S. OLYMPIC COM MimE EXECUTlVE COMMITTEE SANDY BALDWIN Treasurer. usec U.S. Swimming 5048 N. 25th Plaoe Phoenix, p.;z asOi 6 W: (602) 954-6888 F: (602) 381-8798 GEN. HOWARD BUXTON Immed. Past President U,S, Biathlon Assoclotlon p.e. Box 113 Richmond, VT 05477 W: (802) 434-2059 F: (802) 655.4592 CHARLES U. FOSTER S&cretary/uSOe p.e. Box 333 Snug Harbor Duxbury, MA 02331 W: (617) 934.fJ502 F: (617) 934-6504 PAUL E. GEORGE U.S. Figure Skating Assn. 20 First Street Colorado Springs, eo 80906<3697 GEORGE W. GOWEN, ESQ. usoe Counselor Fryer, Ross & Gowen 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1922 New York, NY 10176 W: (212) 286-0099 F: (212) 286-0495 bR. RALPH W. HALE Vice President - USOC 1319 Punahou Street, 8th Floor Honolulu, HI 96826 W: (B08) 956-7457 H: (BOO) 950-2174 ANDREW T. KOSTANECKI usee Board of Directors Chair, sere u.s. Sailing Asaoclatlon 47 Elm Street New Canaan, CT 06840 W: (203) 966-1681 H: (203) 656-3377 MICHAEL LENARD Vice Preaident Latham & Watkins First Interstate World Center 633 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 W: (213) 891-8742 F: (213) 891-8783 ANITA L. DE FRANTZ President Ama. Athletic Foundation of LA 2141 Weat Adams Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90018 W; (213) 730-9614 F: (213) 730-9637 CHRIS DORST usec Board/MC USOC Exec. emte. 2043 Valparaiso Avenue Menlo Park, CA 9402~ MARTY MANKAMYER U.S. S",ccer Federation U.S. SOC09r House 1 80H 811 S. Prairie Avenue Chicago, IL 80618 TERRY MCCANN USA Wrestling P.O. Box 9052 Mission VIeJo, CA 92690 W: (714) 858-8255 F: (714) 656-1207 KATHY REX USOC Board/MC 3915 Dewpolnt Coloredo Springs, CO 80920 W: (719) 594-4787 BONNIE WARNER 5839 N. Irish Pat Murphy Parker, CO 80134 JOHN RUGER USOC Board of Directors/MC 3344 1 6th Street Boulder, CO 80304-2250 W: (303) 444-3353 F: (303) 444-3284 OEOROE C. SCHAEFER Asat. Director, Personnel Support Policy and Services Department of Defense OASD (FM&P) (PS,F&E) The Pentagon, Room 3C975 Washington, D.C. 20301-4000 W; (703) 697-4054 F: (703) 697-2519 DR. HARVEY W. SCHILLER Executive Director U.S. Olympic Committee Secretary General One Olympic Plaza Colorado Springs, CO 80909 W: (719) 578-4542 F: (719) 832-4180 RICHARD D. SCHULTZ National Collegiate Athletic Assn. 6201 College Blvd. Overland Park, KS 6621 1.2422 OEORGE M. STEINBRENNER, III VIce Presldent/USOe Lincoln Point Building 2502 Rocky Point Drive, Suite 890 Tampa, FL 33807 W: (813) 281-9001 F: (813) 281-0942 DR. LEROY T. WALKER Presldent/USOC 2525 Meridian Parkway, Suite 230 Durham, NC 27713 W; (919) 361.2355 F: (919) 361-2788 ~ON.VOTING MEMBEFIS OF USOC BO' ., CAROL BROWN Chair, Athlete Sl.Jpport 1321 35th Avenue South Seattle, WA 98144 W: (206) 587-8018 F: (206) 567-6205 JOHN A. BUTTERFIELD Execl.Jlive Director Pres. Council on Physical Fitness and Sports 701 Pennsylvania Avenue, #250 Washington, D.C. 20004 W: (202) 272-3421 F: (202) 504-2064 QEORGE W. OOWEN, ESQ. USOC Counselor Fryer, Ross & Gowen 551 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1922 New York, NY 10176 W: (212) 286-0099 F: (212) 286-0495 EVlE DENNIS, PH.D. Special Asst. to the President 1313 Steele Street, #601 Denver, CO 60206-2549 W: (303) 764-3300 F: (303) 764-331 a CHAIRES Q. CALE, ESQ. P.O. Box 688 Pacific Palisades, CA 92072 W: (310) 471-8798 F: (310) 476-6099 ROD HERNLEY Chairman Comm. of Sports for the Disabled 333 E. Florida Avenl.Je Unit 23 Denver, CO 80210 W: (303) 733-9349 EDGAR JAY HOUSE President House & Company, Inc. 9 East 53rd Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10022 W: (212) 355-1020 F: (212) 753-7856 ROBERT E, LEACH, M.D. Editor Amer. Journal of Sports Medicine 230 Calvary Street Waltham, MA 02154 W: (617) 738-0707 F: (617) 735.0607 DR. HARVEY W. SCHILLER Execl.Jtive Director U.S. Olympic Committee Secretary General One Olympic Pla2:8 Colorado Springs, CO 80909 W: (719) 678-4642 F: (719)632-4160 RAY B. ESSICK Executive Director U.S. Swimming, Inc. One Olympic Plaza Colorado Springs, CO 80909 W: (719) 578-4678 F: (719) 578-4669 HERMAN R. FRAZIER Chair, Athlete ID/Development Associate Athletic Director Arizona State University Tempe, AZ 85287-2506 W: (602) 965.3856 F: (602) 985-8219 DAVID SIMON Co-Chair, Int. Rei. Committee President Los Angeles Sports COl.Jncil 404 South Bixel Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 W: (213) 829-0613 F: (213) 629-0708 1 STEPHEN B. SOBEL President, USFA Chair, Membership 0. Credentials Comm. 1 B Beverly Road Cedar Grove, NJ 07009 W: (201) 239-7606 F; (201) 239-4107 JOHN L STEFFENS ATTN: Claudia J. Kahn Exec. Vice President Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc. World Financial Ctr./No. Tower 260 Vesey Street New York, NY 1 0281-1332 W: (212) 236-4318 F: (212) 449-9418 EDWARD a. WILLIAMS, ESQ. President. Biathlon Chair, Legislation Committee Wlndels, Marx, Davies & Ivas 156 West 56th Street New York, NY 10019 W: (212) 237-1080 F: (212) 262-1215 2 VOTING MEMBEI'!S OF usoe BOAI'!' KYONGWON AHN President U.S, Taekwondo Union 7701 Reading Road Cincinnati, OH 45237 W: (513) 948-8889 F: (513) 948-1348 OR. ALPHA ALEXANDER usoe Board of Directors, VINCA Dlr., Health Promotion & Sport 726 Broadway, 5th Floor New York, NY 10003 W: (212) 614-2827 F: (212) 677-9716 GARY L. ANDERSON Executive Director U.S. Shooting Team One Olympic Plaza Colorado Springs, CO 80909 W: (719) 578-4880 F: (719) 578-4884 DWIGHT BELL President U.S. Luge Association 9 Parks Ide Court Atlanta, GA 30342 W: (404) 392-7251 F; (404) 392-7253 AFlTHUR ASHE 370 E. 761h Street, #A-1402 New York, NY 10021 H: (212) 288-1075 F: (212) 744-4205 DOROTHY Fl. BAkER State Olympic Organizations 31 6 Waycross Road Woodbrook Wilmington, DE 19803 W: (302) 652.6693 F; (302) 655-9253 WARREN 6. BROWN executive Director USA Basketball One Olympic Plaza Colorado Springs, eo 80909 W: (719) 632-7667 F: (719) 632-3227 DR. PETER G. BUEHNING President U.S, Team Handball Federation 400 Hillside Avenue P.O. Box 868 Hillside, NJ 07205 W: (201) 926-6000 F: (201) 928-3580 EDWARD A. BURKE, JR. Chair, Junior Olympic Comm. Los Gatos Athletic Club 265 East Main Street Los Gatos, CA 95032 W: (408) 354-5808 F: (408) 395-6563 SANDY BALDWIN Treasurer - usoe U.S. Swimming 5048 N. 26th Place Phoenix, AZ 65016 W: (602) 954-6888 F: (602) 381-8798 WALTEFI L. BUSH, JR. President USA Hockey DENWAL-Olymplc Place, Suite 500 7825 Washington Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55439 W: (612) 942-7011 F: (612) 942-7019 GEN. HOWARD BUXTON Immed. Past President U.S. Biathlon Association P.O. Box 113 Richmond, VT 05477 W; (e02) 434-2059 F: (802) 655-4592 1 JOHN M. BYnNE usoe Board of Dir, .ors U.S. Int'l Speedskatlng ASSn. 1903 N. Pebble Beach Sun City Center, FL 33573-5176 W: (B13) 634-7234 F: (B13) 634-4024 I<EITH CALKINS President USCC Board of Directors Amer. Amat. Racquetball Assoc. 815 N. Weber Colorado Springs, CO 80903 W: (719) 635-5398 F: (719) 635-068S LYNN CANNON VIce Chalr/AAC USCC Board 01 Directors 3811 Runaway Road Crovllle, CA 95965 H: (916) 342-8460 F: (916) 343-5916 JIMMY CARNES USOC Board of Directors The Athletics Congress (TAC) 1330 NW Sixth Street, Suite A Gainesville, FL 32601-4245 W: (904) 336-2120 F: (904) 373.BB79 RICHARD W. CASE Executive Director & CEO USOC Board of Directors U.S. Baseball Federation 2160 Greenwood Avenue Trenton, NJ 08609 W: (609) 586-2381 F: (809) 587-1818 GARY CASTRO Chairman of the Board U.S. ROller Skating 12609 DeelWood Court Oklahoma City, OK 73142 W: (405) 751-0310 F: (405) 755-1369 - - . -'. DR. JAMES r :HASTEEN President & (.;EO National Association Intercollegiate Athletics 1221 Baltimore Kansas City, MO 64105 W: (816) B42-5050 F: (816) 421-4471 JANE F. CLARK President American Horse Shows Msn. 220 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10017-5876 W: (212) 972-2472 F: (212) 887-5561 DOUQLAS G. CORDERMAN President U.S. Nat'l Senior Sport Org, 14323 South Outer Forty Road Suite N300 Chesterfield, MO 630t7 W: (314) 878-4900 F: (314) 67B-9957 PHILIP V. COTA Executive Director Armed Forces Sports Secretariat USACFSC (CFSC-AFS) 2461 Eisenhower Avenue Hoffman Bldg, #1, Room 1456 Alexandria, VA 22331-0522 W: (703) 325-9710 F: (703) 325-2519 JIM CURRY AAClWeightliftlng 1747 Lincoln Avenue, Apt. 17A San Rafael, CA 94901 W: (415) 453-8851 F: (415) 467-3919 ANITA L. DEFRANTZ President Ame. Athletic Foundation of LA 2141 West Adams Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 9001 e W: (213) 730-9614 F: (213) 730-9637 2 . . - - - . ~ . BRIAN DERWIN usee Board of D. ,tors U.S. Welghtllfting 1313 Steele Street, #801 Denver, CC 80206-2649 W: (303) 764-3300 F: (303) 764-3318 BOBBY DODD President Amateur Athletic Union e840 Garden Oaks Drive Memphis, TN 38120 W: (901) 755-2173 F: (901) 756-2173 CHRIS DORST USCC Board of Directors/AAC 2043 Valparaiso Avenue Menlo Perk, CA 94025 H: (415) 854-7360 F: (408) 263-9682 BRICE B. DURBIN 11724 NW Plaza Circle P.O. Box 20626 Kanses City, MO 64195 W: (816) 464-5400 F: (816) 464-5571 JERRY DUSENBERRY President USA Boxing, Inc. 5025 S.E. 51st Portland, OR 97201:; H: ,(503) 771-3652 F: (503) 777-7946 eOL. LARRY FLOWERS 607 NW. Street Falls Church, VA 22046 W: (703) 748-3935 CHARLES U. FOSTER Secretary/USCC P.O. Box 333 Snug Harbor Duxbury, Ma 0233i W: (617) 934-6502 F; (617) 934-6504 RICHARD J 1STER President, I.J.~. Water Polo Case, Knowlson, MObley, Burnett & Luber 5 Park Plaza, Suite 600 Irvine, CA 92714 W: (714) 955-1050 F: (714) 851-9112 MARTIN R. FRENCH USCC Board of Directors U.S. Badminton Association 2645 I=!ichmond Court San Bernardino, CA 92408 W; (714) 261-5320 F: (714) 825-1734 FRANK P. FULLERTON President U.S. Judo, Inc. P.O. Box 10013 EI Paso, TX 79991 W; (915) 565-8754 F: (915) 566-16e8 PAUL E. GEORGE USCC ad, of Dlr,fFlgure Skating Kellogg, Gardner & George 20 William Street, Suite 150 Wellesley, MA 02161 W: (617) 237-5400 F: (617) 235-3421 THOMAS E. aOMPF U.S. Diving, Inc. 16946 Royak Polnc;ena Drive Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33326 W; (305) 369-4789 F: (306) 389-4788 TOM GORMAN Tennis Director Ritz Carlton Hotel 68-900 Frank Sinatra Drive Rancho Mirage, CA ,92270 W: (619) 321-8282 F: (619) 321-6928 3 ""'I..I~I LJI'^t:'V^ 11..:1t,;I,;Vf.lJ.\,;~' IVt.1 'V oJ oJoJ.... FRANK E. GREENBEP'" President, TAO Jenkins Court, Suite 200 61 0 Old York Road Jenklnstown, PA 19046-2811 W: (215) 687-0200 F; (215) 884-3500 DR. RALPH W, HALE Vice President - USOC 1319 punahou Street, 8th Floor Honolulu, HI 96628 W: (808) 956-7457 F: (80S) 955-2174 STEPHEN P. HALEY 444 East 64th Street New York, NY 10026 W: (212) 449-3064 F; (212) 449-2892 ERIC HAUGHT U.S. Canoe/Kayak Team Pan American Plaza, Suite 470 201 South Capitol Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46225 W: (317) 237-5690 F: (317) 237-5694 ROBERT H. HELMICK Immediate Past President U.S. Olympic Committee Dorsey & Whitney 801 Grand, Suite 3900 Des Moines, IA 50309 W: (515) 263-1000 F: (515) 283-1060 PETER HOAG usoe Board of Directors/AAC Unlv. of Colorado Ski Team Stadium 100 Boulder, CO 80303 W: (303) 4Q2-7971 F: (S03) 444-21 SS . .- . - -- WILLIAM HYBl ';a. Immediate Pas\ "'resident - USOC EI Pomar Executive Bldg. Ten Lake Clrcla Colorado Springs, CO 80906 W: (719) 577-5712 F: (719) 577-5702 MIKE JACK I President usoe Board of Directors U.S. Gymnastics Federation 201 S. Capitol Avenue, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46225 W: (317) 237-5050 F; (317) 237-5069 TOM JERNSTEDT USOC Board 01 Directors Nat'l Collegiate Athletic Assn. 8201 College Boulevard Overland Park, KS 66211-2422 W: (913) 339.1906 F: (913) 339-0026 JOSEPH F. JOHNSON Executive Director/CEO Nat'l Assn. - Pollee Athletic Leagues 200 Oastlewood Drive N. Palm Beaoh, FL 33406 W: (407) 644-1823 F: (407) 863-6120 PEGGY JOHNSTON USOC Board 01 Dlrectors/AAC 3415 Guido Street Oakland, CA 94602 W: (51 0) 540-4371 F: (510) 546-3821 RICHARD N. JONES Assoc. Dir., Program Services YMCA of the USA 40 W. Long Street Columbus, OH 43216 W: (614) 224-2225 F: (614) 224-5611 4 JIM R. JOY Director, Morale Sl ~rt Div. Support Aotivltles (MW) 3044 Catlin Avenue Quantico, VA 22134-5099 W: (703) 640-3806 F: (703) 640-7291 JOE KEARNEY USOC Board of Directors Commissioner Western Athletic Conference 14 W. Dry Creek Circle Littleton, CO 80120-4478 W: (303) 796-1962 F: (303) 795-1960 TERRY KENT USCC Board of Dlrectors/MC c/o Frank Russell Company P.O. Box 1616 Tacoma, WA 96401 W: (206) 591-3495 F: (206) 596-2465 GEORGE E. KIL.UAN Executive Director Chair, USOC-USCSC Committee NJCM P.O. Box 7305 Colorado Springs, CO 60933-7305 W: (719) 590-97B8 F: (719) 590-7324 SANDY KNAPP Chair U.S. Gymnastics Federation 3683 Lost Creek Blvd. Austin, TX 76735 W: (512) 326-2615 F: (512) 328-0204 GERALD L KOENING Executive Director U.S. Tenpin Bowling Federation 5301 South 76th Street Greendale, WI 53129-0500 W: (414) 421-9008 F: (414) 421-1194 ANDREW T. "~STANECKI USOC Soan. (Directors Chair, SETC U.S. Sailing Association 47 Elm Street New Canaan, CT 06840 W: (203) 966-1681 F: (203) 656-3377 MICHAEL. B. LENARD Vice President L.atham & Watkins First Interstate World Center 633 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, CA 90071-2007 W: (213) 891-8742 F; (213) 691-8763 MS. MARlY MANKAMYER usce Board of Directors U.S. Soccer Federation 8470 Red Spring Valley Road Colorado Springs, eo 80919 W: (719) 590.9977 F: (719) 590-1706 CONNIE MARA President Amer. Trampoline and Tumbling 3331 Partridge Lane Belvidere, IL 61008 W: (615) 968-0051 (2280) F: (615) 968-0526 ROBERT MARBUT President San Antonio Local Organizing Comm. P.O. Box 630386 San Antonio, TX 78283-0386 W: (512) 246-1993 FRANK MARSHALL. 100 Universal Plaza Bungalow 73 Universal City, CA 91606 W: (818) 777-2473 F: (616) 622-0112 6 ---r..' , OJ ..,....W I ,. 1~t"'J;1 If"Ifll,,'\J III"."...... ._.. _ BILL MAXSON President U.S. Swimming, Inc. 676 Sugar Hill Drive Ballwln, MO 63021 W: (314) 991 "3387 F: (314) 394-4094 RON NEUGE usoe Board of Dlrectors/AAC 2706 5. Minnesota Wichita, KS 67216 W: (316) 683-6518 F: (316) 683-0918 SHEILA O'DOUGHERTY USOC Board of Directors 617 Gibson Road Baltimore, MD 21229 W: (410) 966-6568 F: (410) 644-6BI1 TERRY MCCANN USA Wrestling P.O, Box 9052 Mission VieJo, CA 92690 W: (714) 858-8255 F: (714) 858-1207 JIMMY MCCLURE 7127 Williams Creek Drive Indianapolis, IN 46240 W: (317) 255-2578 F: (317) 257-5379 TOM OSBORNE President Nat'l Congress of State Games P.O. Box 2318 Billings, MT 59103 W: (406) 265-7426 F: (406) 265-7439 BARBARA MCNAMEE U.S. Synchronized Swimming 670 Foster Drive Des Moines, IA 50312 F: (515) 25$-4338 DR. WAYNE H. OS NESS Chair, Education Committee University Of Kansas 1664 University Drive L.awrence, KS 86044 W: (913) 864-3371 F: (913) 884-5076 JOSEPH PANEPINTO USOC Board of Directors Catholic Youth Organization 1011 First Avenue, Room 620 New York, NY 10022 W: (212) 371-1000 (2053) F: (212) 371-1000 (3465) WILBUR H. PECK President Board of DirectorsNolleyball YMCA of Greater Indianapolis 015 N. Alabama Street, Suite 406 Indianapolis, IN 46204 W: (317) 266-9622 F: (317) 266-2845 CHARLES H. MOORE Public Sector. USOC 13515 Brentwood Lane Carmel, IN 46033 W; (317) 298-5100 F: (317) 843-1744 HM Fax JAMES S. MORRIS, ESQ. Associate Counselor/USOe O'Connor, Morris & Jones 35 Mason Street GreenwIch, CT 06830 W: (203) 629-3335 F: (203) 629-3362 EDWIN MOSES Chair, Subs. Abuse Committee 24662 Dana Point Drive Dana Point, CA 92629 H: (714) 493-0473 F: (213) 550-1350 e MICHAEL P. PLANT Chair, MC President Medalist Sports Inc. 3228 W. Cary Street, Suite D Richmond, VA 23221 W: (804) 354-9934 F; (804) 354-9968 DON E. PORTER Executive Director Ama, Softball Assn, of America 2801 NE 50th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73111-7203 W: (405) 424.5266 F; (405) 424-3855 KATHY REX USOC Board of Dlrectors/AAC 3915 Dewpolnt Colorado Springs, CO 80920 W: (719) 531-3906 H; (719) 694-4787 BRIAN RICHARDSON USOC Board of Diroctors/AAC 930 Remillard Court San Jose, CA 95122 W; (408) 297-7262 F: (408) 287-8178 TIMOTHY L. RICHARDSON Asst. Dlr. of Program Services Boya & Girls Clubs of America 771 First Avenue New York, NY 10017 W: (212) 351-5904 F: (212) 351-5972 MAFlY V. RODNEY USOC Board of Dlrectors/AAC 1327 Mcintyre Ann Arbor, MI 48105-2408 W: (313) 262-5756 JOHN RUGER USOC Board of Directors/AAC 3344 1 6th Street Boulder, CO 80304-2250 W: (303) 444-3353 F: (303) 444-3284 GEORQE C. E AEFER Asst. Director, Personnel Support Policy & Services Department of Defense OASD (FM&P) (PS,F&E) The Pentagon, Room 3C975 Washington, D.C. 20301-4000 W: (703) 697-4054 F: (703) 697-2519 JIM SCHERR Executive Director USA Wrestling 225 South Academy Colorado Springs, CO Bc910 W: (719) 597-8333 F: (719) 597-3195 ALVA SERRETTE USOC Board of Directors/AAC 22303 101 st Avenue Queens Village, NY 11429 ERNEST M. SEUBERT USOC Board of Directors/Cycling Campbell Brokerage Corporation 111 Fulton Street New York, NY 10038 W: (212) 227-3320 F: (212) 693-2064 LEWIS W. SIEGEL Collier, Cohen, Shields & Bach 440 Park Avenue South 4th Floor New York, NY 10015 W; (212) 481-1300 F; (212) 696-4064 WILLIAM E. SIMON Chairman William E. Simon & Sons, Inc. 10890 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 17S0 Los Angeles, CA 90024 W: (310) 914-2410 J.j: (310) 575-3258 7 ROBERT C.W. SMIT" Vice President National Archery Association 555A Vera Circle Bethlehem, PA 18017 W: (215) 694-9839 F: (215) 694-9839 ROBERT L. SMITH usoe Board of Directors US. Tennis Association 422 Inveraray Villanova, PA 19086 W: (215) 687-3946 F; (215) 768-0780 GEORGE M. STEINBRENNER, III Vice Presldent/USOe Uncoln Point Building 2502 Rocky Point Drive, Suite 890 Tampa, FL 33607 W: (813) 281-9001 F: (813) 281-0942 SHARON E. TAYLOR Executive Board/Field Hockey HCR ao, Box 117-A Lock Haven, PA 17745 W; (717) 893-2093 F: (717) 893-2432 PERRY TOLES usec Board of Directors/AAC P.O. Box Drawer 1300 Roswell, NM 68202 W: (505) 622-5863 F: (506) 622-3196 ERNIE VANDE ZANCE USOC Board of Dlrectors/MC 9217 t#V 17th Avenue Vancouver, WA 98665-6517 W: (206) 696.8171 F: (206) 574.7246 DR. LEROY T. WALKER Presldent/USOe Atlanta Comm. for Olym, Games 250 Williams Street, Suite 6000 Atlanta, GA 30303 W: (404) 224-1927 F: (404) 224-1997 it', ". "','. ..;' THOMAS ' \~CH President It, Salt Lake City Olympic Bid Comm. 215 South State, Suite 2002 Salt ~ke City, UT 84111 W:' , (1301) 322.2002 F: (801) 364-7644 WHITING WILLAUER . USOC' Board of Directors/Skiing 4201 Cathedral Ave, NW, Apt. 701-W Washingt~n. D.C. 20016 W:' (703) 803-5348 ,F; ,,(7o'J; 803-5340 "\ " " . CHRIE!1'9AiEF! WOOD 2372a"~h"Place West Edmond'~~WA 98020 W: (20G) 386-5520 F: (206) 386-7989 DUNCAN WYETH USCPAA 3147 Boston Blvd. Lansing, MI 48910-2534 W: (517) 373-8193 F: (517) 373-0665 HON. ANDREW YOUNG Co-Chairman Atlanta Comm. for Olym, Games 250 Williams Street, Suite 6000 Atlanta, GA 30303 W: (404) 224-1926 F: (404) 224-1966 HAROLD O. ZlMMAN usee Board of Dlrectors/JCe c/o H.C. Zlmman/Seaport Landing 152 The Lynnway L)'nn. MA 01902-9230 W: (817) 598-9230 F: (617) 599-4018 e