Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1994/4/27 (2) City Planning Commission Agenda Hem for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page I 1. PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-94-40: request to establish a substance abuse counseling and monitorine: Drogram for probationers at 249-257 Broadway - Mental Health Systems. Inc. A. BACKGROUND 1. The applicant, Mental Health Systems, Inc., is requesting permission to establish a substance abuse counseling and monitoring program for probationers at 249-257 Broadway. The program, Probationers in Recovery (PIR), is ajoint venture with the County of San Diego Probation Department and funded by the County Department of Alcohol and Drug Services. 2. The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that this proposal is exempt from environmental review under CEQA as Class lea) and Class 5 exemptions. B. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Planning Commission Resolution recommending that the City Council approve PCC-94-40 based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached draft City Council Resolution. C. DISCUSSION 1. Zonine: and Land Use Site North South East West C-T C-T C-T R-3 C-T Campaign Offices/Partially Vacant Retail (Bar/Retail Uses) Retail (Vacant Spaces/ Auto Repair) Single & Multi-Family Residential Automotive Sales/Mobilehome Park 2. Site Characteristics The site contains a 5,700 sq.ft. commercial building, of which Mental Health Systems proposes to lease the southerly 3,400 sq.ft. for their operations. The balance of the building is currently occupied by campaign headquarters and would remain under separate lease. There are a total of fourteen parking spaces on site. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page 2 3. Proiect Description The Probationers in Recovery program includes substance abuse counseling and education for, as well as monitoring of, probationers. The program is a joint venture between Mental Health Systems, Inc., a not-for-profit organization, and the County of San Diego Probation Department. The program includes interior improvements to the building to create office spaces to suit their program needs. As a public/quasi-public use it requires a recommendation by the Planning Commission and approval by the City Council as an Unclassified Use per Section 19.54.020(M). The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the proposal is exempt from environmental review under CEQA as a Class lea) exemption (minor alterations to existing structures) and a Class 5 exemption (minor change in land use). 3. Program Clients The clients served by the PIR program include both male and female probationers. They are referred to this program primarily by probation officers, and are court-ordered to attend; the alternative is incarceration. Clients are directed to this program based upon their drug history and the fact that the crimes they have committed are related to their addiction(s). The typical client is an unmarried man around the age of 30 years. Neither 'career criminals' nor those who have committed violent offenses are permitted into the program, nor are persons with other special needs (such as the mentally i1l). The typical types of crimes which have been committed by the client prior to probation are as follows: 70% - 80% convicted of drug related crimes (under the influence, possession, sales) convicted of property crimes (burglary) convicted of personal crimes (mugging) 15% - 20% 5% - 10% Please see Exhibit" A" Clients are required to pay for their participation in the PIR program based on a sliding scale. Those who are unable to pay must perform community service activities. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page 3 4. Program Description The PIR program was originally established in the City of Vista in November of 1989. Mental Health Systems also runs this program at facilities in Los Angeles and San Bernardino. The program consists of two phases of individual and group substance abuse counseling and education by clinical staff, and monitoring of clients by probation officers. Phase I of the program lasts for a minimum of six months. During this time, clients must check in with probation officers daily by phone and report for random urine testing as required, attend counseling and education classes three times a week, and attend Narcotics Anonymous/Alcohol Anonymous meetings each week. If a review board consisting of probation officers, clinical staff, and a previous graduate determines that the client is ready, he/she enters phase 11. This three month program focuses on relapse prevention, and includes one group counseling session per week with continued attendance at Narcotics/ Alcohol Anonymous meetings. Probation officers work at the same location as the counselors, enabling them to monitor clients' activities and behaviors including their compliance with program requirements. Probation officers have the authority to search clients, test for drugs, impose sanctions for transgressions, and take clients into custody if they deem necessary. Therefore, if clients fail to attend scheduled counseling sessions or engage in other unacceptable behaviors, the probation officers can address the problem immediately. Failure on the part of the client to follow the program as required could result in curfew, additional counseling, public service projects, or other penalties. Should a client be found or suspected of being under the influence of drugs or alcohol at the site, the client will be immediately transported from the site to his/her home, a detoxification facility, or jail. Program counselors primarily consist of recovered addicts (a minimum of four years clean) with clinical training. The minimum educational requirements for counselors is a bachelor's degree with state counseling certification. Please see attached Exhibit "B". City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page 4 Program Schedule The applicant has provided a tentative counseling schedule which shows individual counseling from 8:00 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. Group counseling sessions, ranging in size from 12 to 30 persons, will take place from 10:00 a.m. to noon, 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. during the week. Limited activity will take place on the weekends, consisting primarily of random drug testing by probation officers between the hours of II :00 a. m. and 1:00 p. m. Please see attached Exhibit "C", 5. Public Forum A public forum was held on March 30, 1994, involving staff, representatives from Mental Health Systems and the County Probation Department, and three members of the public (the forum was noticed beyond the normal 500' radius and inc1uded all property owners, residents, and commercial tenants). After the presentation and a question and answer period, those in attendance voiced general support for the program. Several phone calls received by staff in response to the notice focused primarily on whether or not this would be a residential facility. When it was explained that it was not a residential program, there appeared to be no objection to the proposal from the callers. D. ANALYSIS The PIR South Bay program was initial1y established in National City. After operating there for approximately one year, PIR staff were notified by City officials that their approval did not include group counseling of the nature that was being conducted (no formal complaints were lodged with National City by the public). PIR staff opted not to pursue the conditional use permit process in National City, and began seeking locations elsewhere in the South Bay (they are currently operating in National City subject to a written agreement limiting the size of counseling group sessions). This program is considered unique as a drug rehabilitation program, due to the involvement of the Department of Probation. Probation officers are on site throughout the day, which provides an added element of security to the operation. Although officers are not armed, they are authorized to conduct search and seizure on probationers, and can arrest them if the need arises. Officials of PIR program report that they have had no altercations involving clients in past years; however, probation officers could call for police back-up if they felt it was warranted. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page 5 A break room will be provided within the facility, and program staff state that they will not permit loitering in the area around the site. This would address any concerns that clients would congregate outside, or that they may present a security problem to nearby businesses and residents. Staff has spoken with City of Vista staff, where an identical program is currently operating. The program at that location is situated in a commercial center some distance from any residential areas. They have received no complaints regarding that operation. Additionally, Chula Vista staff made an unannounced visit to the PIR facility in Vista. A number of clients were present for a group counseling session which appeared very orderly and well controlled. There were no people (clients or otherwise) standing about outside of the offices or counseling rooms, and the operation seemed to run quite smoothly. PIR staff has provided the results of their interviews with people adjacent to the Vista facility stating that they have had no problems with the program or its clients (please see attached Exhibit "D"). Staff finds that the program provides adequate controls from impacts that may impact surrounding businesses and residents. Additionally, the presence of probation officers on site discourages the possibility of problems related to clients that might be under the influence or exhibiting aggressive behaviors. Staff believes that the program is a beneficial one in that it provides rehabilitative services, and that sufficient safeguards are in place to protect the surrounding neighborhood. Also, staff is recommending a condition to require staff review after one year in order to ensure that there have been no adverse impacts. Parking The site has fourteen parking spaces, of which eight would be available for PIR based upon their occupancy of 60 % of the building. Although the applicant states that only 30% of the clients drive themselves, the fact that there could be as many as six staff and 30 clients on site at one time could result in a parking deficit. It should be noted, however, that a retail tenant with a theoretical parking demand of 17 parking spaces could occupy the same floor area as a matter of right. Based upon PIR's estimate that only 30 % of clients drive to the site, the PIR program at peak would create a demand for 16 spaces, or one less than a retail tenant. City Planning Commission Agenda Item for Meeting of April 27, 1994 Page 6 In addition, the site will generally be operating well below peak, with 2-3 staff and at most no more than 10-15 clients, resulting in a parking demand which closely approximates the number of available spaces. PIR has agreed to limit groups to not more than 15 clients in order to balance the demand with available parking. Based on the foregoing, staff recommends approval of the proposal subject to the conditions itemized in the draft City Council resolution Department Comments The following comments have been received from other City departments and are listed here for information only. The Fire Department has provided the following comments: a. Fire extinguishers will be required. b. A fire inspection will be required. c. State licensing requirements shall be met. The Building & Housing Department has advised that any remodeling will require a building permit. The Engineering Department has provided the following comments: a. Procurement of a Construction Permit will be required for any work performed in the public right-of-way; this may include, but is not necessarily limited to, the installation of a 150 watt HPSV street light. b. Payment of sewer, administrative fee, and sewer capacity fees shall be calculated upon submitta1 of building plans. (f: \home\planning \palty\pcc9440. rcp) ---.J II , E:;-' ~-r~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I L ---; I I I. I _ _ _ _ ...1_..1_ _ _ ....1__ , I I :~IV @ HOM.-- ---- -------,-- I I tbfv11 L.- L..-.!r - IL..- PROJECf LOCATION ~1 ~f' 11 ~ 0. & ~ I CoM v }! ::II ;lilt DAVD E~ ~--i1- r- . M~P . ~ z r-- L___ 1"'1 h1f I r- -- I r-- I M~P I I I I '--- I I, t I c- <>1-1\1. , l~tJt-I~ I r-- I I Cbt.i I I 'F' ~~~T CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT C) APPLICANT: MENTAL HEALTH PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SYSTEMS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ADDRESS: 249-57 BROADWAY Court ordered counseling for and monitoring SCALE: FILE NUMBER: of probationers. NORTH 1" = 200' PCC - 94 - 40 , T" -- . EAST PARK LANE (AI f) ..3 LX/.5n/Yt; ./H~~u.(.. .s/HG~ -- ~ ;;h eXlcT~ A/~;D~.I~9T f} \ eX/. "t; y~ .GN'.97h" &I~~ A<7 ~<;$<:),e 5//0) , , . . ~/Q " k~ .\) I~ ( LJ<ASr/lr .d~ ,J"'7, ~ -a.z. ~;', , ----.., AX/.' '/.4. . ~ .dY U+l"'1~'-/L2 I ~MI~ ~T,;:2 I I ~'-o" ~ ~ ~'$'o ~ ~ 5~ '~ Stl6..leCT .~ 7?J ~.u,r: ) ~ ~'O'l .~ . ~ . . /dO.a;J' . ... ~ ,/ f-' ~ 4J>". _ Robin J. Frw/in __ ~ .. _ _ fI ...... .... ____ ... .. .........." ...... 00 "reI E)(,(Sr~ S/..o&#/1~ 1 ~ LJb<tt D GaQ, 101.5. /morn:f ....... 30120 Camro oeI ~ SuIIe 215 San Diego. ec. 92101 (609) 2a3-02$o1 FAIl. (609) 2>>~ PLOT PLAN ML -.JD A,P.N. 567-053-01 LOTS 1 AND 2 ROBERTA PARK N02 MAP 2328 ~ ilill ~ n ~ ~ II ~ j ~ ~~; III 0 !....., ... ",i~- ~ :!;;!~:2.~ 1/1 :z: !:i ~ ...; ~ ; i . .. :!3 ... c'" ~ c1 i !i t .~'~t ~ p ~ ~~ ! .; ::i , I U 1 ~ i e ~ I I { ! I I ~ i i i ; ,~ ! .. \ ,. g . ~ i , ~ ~I .. J ~ ~\ Ii ~~ ~ . 'Ii .. ~ ,~~ RESOLUTION NO. PCC-94-40 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., TO OPERATE A GROUP COUNSELING AND MONITORING FACILITY FOR PROBATIONERS AT 249-57 BROADWAY IN THE C-T ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on February 9, 1994 by Mental Health Systems, Inc. ("Applicant"); and WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC-94-40) to establish a substance abuse counseling and monitoring program for probationers to be located at 249-57 Broadway in the C-T zoning district ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within an area greater than 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely April 27, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends to the City Council that the conditional use permit be granted based on the findings and subject to the conditions found in the attached draft City Council Resolution PCC-94-40. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day 27th day of April, 1994 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: Thomas A. Martin, Chairman Nancy Ripley, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-94-40, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A SUBSTANCE ABUSE INDIVIDUAL AND GROUP COUNSELING AND MONITORING FACILITY FOR PROBATIONERS AT 249-57 BROADWAY IN THE C-T ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on February 9, 1994 by Mental Health Systems; and WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC-94-40) to allow a substance abuse counseling and monitoring program for probationers to be located at 249-57 Broadway in the C-T zoning district; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 27, 1994 and voted _ recommending that the City Council approve subject project; and, WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within an area greater than 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., May _, 1994 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby find: I. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. The conditional approval of PCC-94-40 is necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which will contribute to the general well being of the community by providing counseling and monitoring designed to reduce substance abuse and related crime. 2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of pel'sons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The conditional approval of PCC-94-40 should not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity because the program and clients are well controlled and conditions have been included to address potential off-site impacts. 3. That the PI'oposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the Municipal Code for such use. The project will be required to comply with all applicable codes, conditions, and regulations on a continuing basis. 4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely af'f'ect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency. The granting of PCC-94-40 will not adversely affect the General Plan in that counseling facilities such as that proposed are permitted as an Unclassified Use upon approval ofthis conditional use permit by the City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants conditional use permit PCC-94-40 subject to the following conditions whereby: a. The program shall comply with descriptions and schedules submitted by the applicant unless otherwise modified by these conditions. b. The program shall comply with all applicable state and county licensing requirements and regulations for such programs. c. Eight of the fourteen on-site parking spaces shall be labeled and designated for tlie Probationers in Recovery program. d. Group counseling sessions shall be limited to groups of 15 clients or less. e. A probation officer shall be on site during all times at which clients are present. f. No group activities shall take place on-site on weekends. g. Any client found or suspected to be under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs shall be removed from the site and transported by a probation officer to the client's residence or to a County facility, per the policy statement which has been incorporated into the program description. h. Clients of the program shall not be allowed to loiter or congregate in the vicinity of the subject site. Clients shall remain on site for the duration of their visits, and breaks shall be conducted within the enclosed building. I. Where feasible, residents of Chula Vista shall be given preference for entry into the program. J. Program coordinators shall encourage clients who are required to participate in community service activities to investigate involvement in organizations based in Chula Vista. k. The permit shall be reviewed in one year by Planning staff in consultation with the Police Department to ensure no adverse impacts as well as compliance with all conditions of approval. Upon a positive finding, no further review shall be necessary; a negative finding shall result in the forwarding of a recommendation for revocation to the Planning Commission for consideration. At any time prior to that date, however, substantiated conflicts with, or complaints from the surrounding neighborhood will be cause for immediate review and possible revocation of the permit. 1. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to health, safety, or welfare which the City shall impose after advance written notice to the permittee and after the City has given to the permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected to economically recover. m. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any conditions of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for additional conditions or revocation. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant. Presented by Approved as to form by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista, California, this _ day of May, 1994, by the following vote: YES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Beverly Authelet City Clerk TYPES OF CRIMES COMITTED PRIOR TO PROBATION 70%-80% CONVICTED OF DRUG-RELATED CRIMES -- UNDER THE INFLUENCE -- POSSESSION -- SALES 15%-20% CONVICTED OF PROPERTY CRIMES -- BURGULARY 5%-10% CONVICTED OF PERSONAL CRIMES -- MUGGING EXHIBIT "A" EXHIBIT "B" PROBATIONERS IN RECOVERY Probationers in Recovery is a joint venture of Mental Health Systems, Inc. (a not for profit organization) and the San Diego County Adult Probation Department and is funded through the San Diego County Alcohol and Drug Services. Three probation officers and three clinical staff are located by themselves in a free standing unit. Probationers in Recovery, affectionately referred to by both staff and clients as PIR, has been in operation in the South Bay for nearly three years. PIR South is a replication of a program originally begun in Vista in November of 1989. Since opening the doors in South Bay on April 1, 1991, PIR has served approximately 270 clients and is experiencing a 37% success rate. Screening by both probation and clinical staff identify the preferred client; one who is a drug addict whose addiction led him/her to drug related criminal activity. Clients attend this intense, two phase, outpatient drug rehabilitation program for a minimum of nine months attending Phase I classes three times a week for two hours each to receive drug education, aggression replacement training and experience group process. Clients are expected to finish Phase I in a timely progression with goals outlined for each of the first six months. In addition to the groups, clients must attend two NA meetings per week, attend two individual counseling sessions monthly and report for random urine testing. (Probation Officers test even on the weekends). After completing Phase I, clients come before a five member Review Panel consisting of probation officers and clinical staff and one previous graduate. If four of the five panel members agree that the client has the tools necessary to live a productive, crime free, drug free life then the client is assigned to Phase n. This three month, After Care program focuses on Relapse Prevention., Clients attend only one group per week while continuing to attend NNAA two times per week. During the time clients are in the drug rehabilitation program, probation officers monitor these Level I probationers (clients) under the most intense probation supervision in the County. If clients fail to comply with program requirements or test positive for drugs, probation officers apply graduated sanctions (consequences) which could include curfew, extra NA meetings, public work projects, transfer to residential treatment or, if needed, probation revocation and custody. Staff and clients refer to this process as being in one large intervention. Probationers In Recovery is an odd couple, mixed marriage trying to focus on a new defmition of dual diagnosed clients! Three Probation Officers who are charged with supervising CRIMINALS and three drug rehabilitation counselors who are offering experience, strength and hope to ADDICTS form the treatment team. The client focus is always recovery; however, those who fail to meet the conditions of their probation are returned to court immediately. Probationers In Recovery (pIR) opened its doors on April 1, 1991 and has served approximately 370 clients to date and experienced a 37% success rate. 1. The racial breakdown of PIR closely matches the racial breakdown of South Bay. 2, PIR serves 2/3 males and 1/3 females. 3. Nearly 113 of the clients admitted they have been IV drug users. 4. Approximately 30% of clients are referred to detox or residential treatment before being able to successfully complete the program. 5. Typical drug of choice are: 56% methamphetamine 15% heroin 13 % cocaine 10% marijuana 7% alcohol Probationers In Recovery serves 75 clients with a peak capacity of 45 scheduled to attend the morning groups: 45 on Monday morning, 15 on Tuesday, 30 on Wednesday, 15 on Thursday, and 30 on Friday. There is a peak capacity of 30 clients scheduled to attend the evening groups: 30 on Monday, 15 on Tuesday, 15 on Wednesday, 15 on Thursday, and 15 on Friday. A typical client is an unmarried man, average age about 30. Half of our clients have dependent children, are employed and have been convicted of a drug offense prior to their current probation term. Due to their problems with the law and/or their drug addiction, less than 30% of the overall clients drive cars with a disproportionate number of those clients attending the evening groups. Most clients ride public transportation or are driven by friends or relatives. One half of the clients reside in the South Bay cities of Chula Vista, National City, Imperial Beach and Bonita. Chart attached shows the weekly schedule of client flow. ~: ~ EXHIBIT .C" PROBATIONio-.<S IN RECOVERY - SOUTH BA\ 6CHEDULE The office hours are from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm five days per week. Individual appointments are scheduled every half hour from 8:00 am to 9:30 am five mornings a week and every half hour from 3:30 pm to 5:00 pm every afternoon, and every half hour from 4:00 pm to 5:30 pm five evenings a week. Groups are scheduled from 10:00 am to 12 noon five days per week, from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm every afternoon three days a week and from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm five evenings per week. MORNING SCHEDULE MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY INDIVIDUAL 8:oo-8:30am 8:00-8:30am 8:oo-8:30am 8:00-8:30am 8:oo-8:30am 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 8:30-9:ooam 8:30-9:00am 8:30-9:ooam 8:30-9:00am 8:30-9:00am 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 9:00-9:30am 9:00-9:30am 9:oo-9:30am 9:oo-9:30am 9:00-9:30am 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client GROUPS IO:OO-noon IO:OO-noon 10:00-noon IO:OO-noon 10:00-noon 19-22 clients 9-11 clients 19-22 clients 9-11 clients 19-22 clients 6-8 cars 4 cars 6-8 cars 4 cars 6-8 cars AFTERNOON SCHEDULE MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY INDIVIDUAL 3:30pm -0- 3:30pm -0- 3:30pm 1 client 1 client 1 client 4:00pm -0- 4:00pm -0- 4:00pm 1 client 1 client 1 client 4:30pm -0- 4:30pm -0- 4:30pm 1 client 1 client 1 client GROUPS l:oo-3:00pm -0- l:oo-3:00pm -0- 1:00-3:00pm 12-15 clients 12-15 clients 12-15 clients 6-8 cars 6-8 cars 6-8 cars -r~ - ..-. EVENING SCHEDULE MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY INDIVIDUAL 4:00-4:3Opm 4:00-4:3Opm 4:oo-4:3Opm 4:00-4:3Opm 4:00-4:3Opm 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 4:30-5:00pm 4:30-5:00pm 4:30-5:00pm 4:30-5:00pm 4:30-5:00pm 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 5:00-5:3Opm 5:00-5:3Opm 5:00-5:3Opm 5:oo-5:3Opm 5:00-5:3Opm 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client 1 client GROUPS 6:00-8:00pm 6:00-8:00pm 6:oo-8:00pm 6:oo-8:00pm 6:oo-8:00pm 25-30 clients 10-15 clients 10-15 clients 10-15 clients 10-15 clients 6-8 cars 6-8 cars 6-8 cars 6-8 cars 6-8 cars ----- EXHIBIT MD" On 3/17/94 Al Maltos, Senior Probation Officer and Donna Dau., Progra. Coordinator canvassed the neighborhood near the PIR location. A total of 10 residents were scheduled to be interviewed. Two were not at h~e so eight participated in the interviews. All eight responded no to the question asked if they had ever even heard of PIR. All eight responded that they had not noticed a lot of cars or people in the neighborhood at odd times. All eight said they haClonot been inconvenienced by cars parked in front of their home. All eight said they had not noticed anyone loitering in a way that concerned them. All eight said they had not noticed any drug equip_ent, drug users or drug sales in the neighborhood. In addition two commented that it was a neighborhood where people lived with their doors opened and re.ained that way. One interviewee thanked us for helping folks. The two businesses also had not heard of us, did not notice. anything about the cars, the people or drug sales or drug use in the neighborhood. A very rough street map of where the businesses and hOlies are located is included. ! / -i NEIGHBORHOOD INTERVIEWS Conducted by: Date: 1) I am from PIR located over in the bro~n office building, have you heard of us? 2) We have been here for almost three years. Didn't you notice the cars and the people coming and going? 3) Did their cars ever inconvenience you and your need to park? ~) We are a specialized probation department. Have you ever noticed any of our folks loitering around in a ~ay that might concern you? 5) We offer rehabilitation services for drug offenders. Have you noticed any increase in drug equipment, drug users or drug sales that you could attribute to our folks? THE cr OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE ST ?MENT You arc required to me a Slalemenl of D"closure or certain ownership or financial inlercsts, payments, or campaign contrihutions, on all malters which will require diserelionary aClion on Ihe part of Ihe CilY Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following Information muSI he disclosed: \. List the namcs of all persons having a financial inlerest in Ihe properly which is thc suhject of the applicalion or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant. contractor, subconlractor, material supplier. Mental Health Systems, Inc. (non-profit corp) - applicant 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list Ihe names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporal ion or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Mental Health Systems, Inc. (non-profit corp.) - applicant 3. If any person' identified pursuanl to (1) above is non'p",fit organil.alion or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non.profil organizalion or as trUSI"" or t>cnel\ciary or truslor of the trust. William R. Mead. Ph.D., Clinical Director Rosalia HarDer - Board of Directors Bill Eastwood, M.A., Executive Director Nancy Whitcomb - Board of Directors Richard Woodaman, Board of Directors Richard Carillo - Board of Directors Rita Monteiro, Ph.D. - Board of Directo 4. Have you had more than S250 worth of bu.~iness transacled with any memher of the City staff, Boards, Commis.~ions, Commiuees, and Council within the past twelve months? Ycs_ No2!. 11 yes, please indicate person(s): _ 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this malter. William R. Mead, Ph.D. Bill Eastwood, M.A. Robert D. Gaudi 6. Have you and/or your officers nr agents, in the aggregate, contribuled more than SI,OOO to a Councilmember In the current or preceding election perio"? Ycs_ No':':" If yes, state which Councilmember(s): , , '(NOTE: Attacb additional pa~ as Dccco.sary) , , . Date: February 8, 1994 Signature of contractor/applicant Health Systems, Inc. rint or type name of contractor/applicant . P~)fl is tkfim:d as: ~A"y uldivldual, {inn. CO.plJfTllm/llp, JuiIU VOtNfC, QJJnclafin(L. social dlJh. fralmlal n'8CJIIIUJt/(lt1., corporatifHl. ureJle, tnuC, rece;vt:r, J)'uikalt, UUs 11111/ allY other COUIIIY, city and '''141111)', ell)' mUII/(I('o/'I)', rlutricl, Of ",her poll"cal subdwu,oll. Of all)' OIhn group or combuuuiOlI attill& GJ II ",ut.