HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning Comm Reports/1992/08/12 (6)
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 1
5.
PUBLIC HEARING:
Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-37: reauest to
construct a full-service car wash with automotive
detail services at the northeast corner of Fourth
Avenue and E Street- Donald Macek/Billv Shields
A. BACKGROUND
The proposal is to construct a full service car wash and automotive
detail facility on a .45 acre lot located at the northeast corner of
"E" Street and Fourth Avenue, within the C-T zone.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-92-
40, of potential environmental impacts associated with the
implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and
comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that, although there is
the potential for significant environmental impacts, there will be no
significant environmental impacts due to required mitigation measures,
and recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on
IS-92-40.
The applicant has submitted architectural and landscape plans for design
review consideration (DRC-92-50). This project will be considered by
the Design Review Committee at its August 24, 1992 meeting.
B. RECOMMENDATION
1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and
Mitigated Negative Declaration, find that this project will have no
significant environmental impacts and adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-40.
2. Based on findings contained in Section "E" of this report, adopt a
motion to approve PCC-92-37, subject to the following conditions:
a. The proposed business shall not be in operation between the
hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. weekdays and 10:00 p.m. and
8:00 a.m. on weekends.
b. The project shall reclaim and recycle water used for the car
wash.
c. A 7.5 foot noise attenuation wall shall be erected along
portions of the northern and eastern property lines to the
standards outlined in the noise study (Addendum "c" of IS-92-
40). The design of said wall shall be subject to review and
approval of the Design Review Committee, and adequate sight-
distance shall be maintained for adjacent properties, per City
standards.
5, I
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 2
d. All proposed freestanding walls shall be treated with a
graffiti-retardant application.
e. A lighting plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department
for review and approval to ensure that project lighting does
not adversely affect adjacent properties.
f. The existing fire hydrant shall be relocated to the
satisfaction of the Chula vista Fire Department.
g. The project will be subject to all requirements of approval of
the Design Review Committee (DRC-92-S0).
h. The applicant and successors in interest shall be responsible
for repairing any water damage to public improvements
resulting from the operation of the car wash. Failure to
accept said responsibility shall be cause for this permit to
be reviewed by the City for additional conditions or
revocation,
i. All operations shall be conducted in a professional manner.
Employees shall not be permitted to create any disturbance to
neighboring residents by way of playing music loudly,
congregating on site, or otherwise conducting themselves in
any manner which may intrude upon the general well being of
nearby residents.
j. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution
to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to
health, safety or welfare which city shall impose after
advance written notice to the permittee and after the city has
given to the permittee the right to be heard with regard
thereto. However, the city, in exercising this reserved
right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or
deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the
Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use
permitted, be expected to economically recover.
k. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective
if not utilized within one year from the effective date
thereof, in accordance with section 19.14.260 of the Municipal
Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall
cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for additional
conditions or revocation.
DISCUSSION
Adiacent zoninq and land use
Sr.2.,
city Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 3
North
South
East
West
R-3
C-T
C-T
C-T
MUlti-Family Residential
Commercial (Vacant Bank)
Retail Commercial (Camera Shop)
Retail Commercial (Gas station/Mini-Mart)
Existinq site characteristics
The 19,648 sq. ft. site is located at the northeast corner of E Street
and Fourth Avenue. The site is currently vacant, and formerly contained
a gas station; all buildings, structures, and underground tanks
associated with the gas station were previously removed from the site.
Proposed use
The proposal involves the construction of a 3,159 sq. ft. car wash and
detail service facility to include a car wash tunnel, covered detail
area, cashier area, office, equipment and employee rooms, and restrooms.
The plans depict trellis-covered car vacuum and customer waiting areas,
10 off-street parking spaces, and 4,500 sq. ft. of landscaping.
The site has been designed to limit access to the Fourth Avenue frontage
only, thus avoiding potential traffic conflicts. Cars will enter at
Fourth Avenue, pull up to the vacuum area near "E" Street where
customers will disembark and attendants will take over and proceed
through the car wash tunnel along the easterly property line. The
applicant calculates that this vaccuum and wash process will take about
4-5 minutes. Upon exiting the tunnel, cars turn southwest to the open
area where they will spend 2-3 minutes being wiped down by employees and
claimed by customers. The applicant estimates that the overall process
will take approximately 6-8 minutes; based on this, staff finds that
adequate area has been provided for the proposed operations. Vehicles
will then egress the site at Fourth Avenue, which will allow right turns
only.
The building design is of a traditional Spanish style, with a red tile
roof and beige stucco building finish with brown fascia trim. Trellises
have been provided for the customer waiting area as well as the auto
vacuum area, and perimeter walls and landscaping, including berming
along the "E" Street frontage, will be installed.
D. ANALYSIS
section 19.58.060 of the Municipal Code provides that car wash
facilities shall be soundproofed such that any noise emanating therefrom
shall be no more audible than the noise emanating from the normal street
traffic at a comparable distance; that hours of operation shall be from
7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. unless approved by the planning commission; that
vacuuming facilities shall be located to discourage vehicle stacking and
traffic congestion problems; and that buildings shall be set back from
5,3
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 4
the front property line as determined by the zoning administrator.
The City's noise standards limit exterior daytime noise levels (7:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m. weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. weekends) to 60
dBA and 65 dBA for multi-family and commercial receptors, respectively.
Additionally, interior noise levels for mUlti-family may not exceed 55
dBA between 7 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., or 45 dBA between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00
a.m.
A noise study conducted by Regional Environmental Consultants (June 26,
1992) indicates that with the use of noise reduction devices proposed by
the applicants to be installed on the project's blowers, which dry the
cars as they exit the wash tunnel (in this case at the north of the
site), noise levels generated would be 74.3 dBA average hourly sound
level at 20 feet directly in front of the wash tunnel. However, with
the installation of a 7.5 foot stucco wall in place of the proposed 6
foot wall at portions of the north and east property lines, the City's
exterior noise level limit of 60 dBA at the closest residential receptor
(directly north) would be met, as would the interior noise level limit
of 45 dBA for mUlti-family residences. The 60 dBA noise level standard
applied meets city requirements between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00
p.m. on weekdays, and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekends; therefore,
operations will be limited to these hours. The applicant's proposed
hours of operation of the car wash are actually 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
daily.
Access to the site is as far removed from the intersection as possible
in order to minimize traffic conflicts, and ingress and egress have been
limited to the Fourth Avenue frontage to provide on-site stacking areas
for the car vacuums and to preclude traffic congestion problems on both
"E" street and Fourth Avenue. The estimated 900 average daily trips
(ADT) expected to be generated by the car wash will not reduce the
present peak hour level of service "A" on Fourth Avenue, nor "B" on "E"
street.
The following comments have been submitted by the Engineering and Fire
Departments:
1. Sewer, traffic signal, and development impact fees will be assessed
when the building permit is issued.
2. Street right-of-way dedication for widening on Fourth Avenue and
"E" street..
3. Public improvement plan
4. A separate construction permit for work performed in the right-of-
way.
5. Public improvements include, but are not limited to, the following:
s,1
city Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 5
a. Curb, gutter, and sidewalk
b. Pedestrian ramps and driveways
c. Asphalt concrete paving for street widening, PCC paving of
alley
d. street light, 250 watt, HPSV, at east property line on "E"
street
e. Relocation of traffic signal standard
f. Extend median by 65' on Fourth Avenue and construct median on
"E" street
g. Paint crosswalk per CVDS 33
h. Replace transition on Fourth Avenue with alley type approach
and transition through width of approach
6. Relocate signs, poles, bus stop, etc.
7. utilities shall be underground.
8. Relocate existing hydrant on the corner of Fourth Avenue and "E"
street so as not to block handicap ramp, and locate as shown on
plans.
9. Provide (2) 2A 10BC extinguishers, (1) to be located in detail
area, (1) to be located in customer area.
E. FINDINGS
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to
provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being
of the neighborhood or the community.
The proposed full-service car wash will provide a convenient
service to residents in the area as well as motorists by providing
an accessible facility along a major thoroughfare.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular
case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements
in the vicinity.
The site plan has been designed to avoid the creation of traffic
hazards and congestion; the proposed use, as conditioned, will
upgrade the appearance of the site and will not be detrimental to
the health, safety, or general welfare of persons in the vicinity.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the code for such use.
The project will be required to comply with all applicable codes,
conditions, and regulations prior to the issuance of development
permits, and on a continuing basis thereafter.
5,.5
City Planning Commission
Agenda Item for Meeting of August 12, 1992
Page 6
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely
affect the general plan of the city or the adopted plan of any government
agency.
The approval of this permit as conditioned is consistent with City
policies and the General Plan.
?'~
. --- -~ ~ - .
I
I ~----- I .
~-~------, I r-~-- I
. I ,
~------ ! I i
__ _.&. -'--
- , j..- ----
!
.
- 8
I . ----
. ---. ~"
.s MP
0-f ---.
'p ---.
i -/ ,
. c:r. ---.
i'--1r . ,
- L~~~~fJN
. ~:.
,
fvjf I.
i! Hf ..
I
"1r -
@ J,-../r/ /A5 -1 AUTo ~ 1
:e:;rAT14J 'I ~ t l!f~"
"1F- I I
"11f..J1 //~ ~ @ CCHM I I
MF "tt-F--i ~ ! I
. ;
I~~r~~,a.. U\ .. C-T l-
I-;:- z.. Au-rv I
/f If ~ :1_ :::> lL ~ ' ~->"1C;
::\ 2 ~K. JJ - ~_~
r,. c: \. '
~ - 1. .;..---.
. ';jf'__.
ill , :J
~ :3 1 ~ . . ~--.._.
-:1 ----- '.
M . >- > ----
I ~ .., t - ,
.---- .. r ,_ ----
-- I ~~-o-~ .]R-3 -_-__ ~ -----
~ /
~ -,.. ~. ~ ---~~ ?--- i -----
<- .. --- - - - - - ---
~ . - --- -----
~ ..--- - --. -----
~ l.1:. -- _ ____. -~--IIIIIIII ----- ____
-DAVII/~~r-.I-~T~
I , 1 (:':q!
I
I
. - J
J ((:eNAVD~/~J,..\.,(~I~' l LOCATOR
~11 '~' t?t~~ f'F2l'P~EiP f1J[..L. ~~VI~
~ L -' ~'( P tb - 4 ~.- ~ 1 )
c.Aje. . W~H
... 5~7 "
.
.
..
-
NORTH
,,,........... ...,,.,.-'.....-.................-....
ONINNY'd - J1IlU)UUDIY II"""'" .......
S~UNIM :lJN:I~mn ~I
~~
~
~
~
~
~
.0;01
If'
.
..
..) ~ .~
'.
"
.
~
~
~
,. ."'IL'
.!! II
i
';
-.
" ,
..- '.
,-
:~
-"
Ii C?~I
~.._I'
Q ..o;:a!
. -.. -: ~.;:!~
ill
w
1..3
~!~
~ec
~=-'5
! ~'2
h ~h
>1 j,s
a..", ....
'I' AH.
!,! .. ii!l
ill ~d!~
l
. 3
.
.....L..'A '-"I"'t'f?
:, I
'.
.,
~ ~ ;JtJ-Ut
..... u.....
~ ~~ E i?
! J"': .. . ~ ~
-=.. ...,;! t: ~ t
..~:; ~ s- ~ .
~ 5 ~ tt~\: ':'0 r
~,!:d\... jut H 1..! !
.. ...0 ",:J ~ .. r ;t... \) \I '
"ill':' ~~.... 1!~~ fl..
~ ~~9S ,:"~:; E....!!...} ~ ~ ii
~ 11m Ii. :: ~ ~~: 'I: ~!.. ~ ~I. I I~ ~I- ;~!
D 0 <!I iI ~ ~I ~ . 2 t!!
o ~ ~ ~ 2:r " ~~!
....-.~ "~AJI~ ~q.........
,0,"' '?'/,//,/$//////~~~/j
,OiL"
.Q-i" fO,' .".
~
I;i
'"
-0
.~
."'>j"
~'.lIII'C'1OoI'O.""'''''''''
}
. /
/j
\.. /
I.J.-----
'JI
hi
!
A..........ra::I,_
...... ..~
i -
.
r :;
I i ~
-r:
3
""
z
"
~
,"
,,"
ONINNVld
S~llNIM
JII(U:)UltQIV
.~.Iol
..~
, .
-vjSl/". -.;t"1(1H?
j-i....'VM ~ ""3 t t"Ur
..." .,.....
I
dI
M!J
i
o
M!J
.
=2
<
~. .:q!~ Q
, n .. ~~~
.,. ~~ ~ ~~ u:I
""" II,
I ,
. .
.,
, .
,
,
.
!' i-{
1-9
.0',0
, inln .
! ~~ i
~
ONINNY1d
S1I3J.NIM
JJ:ln.1,:)UIHJJ:lY
,{;, 1'''.
'" ~.,~',~"1f/~\'
,~I~) 'f /.' ":,'1"/11
":.I'!Y,I~'~\,,1!':"'~'.
"~tlf~'~1~~b!t'~1 .. ,;:'
" .f.. ~ '.\ " 'X
".j,~,,~~.ti .!.: ,\,'"
I~",,,','''f, .
\ .
'-T' 1 'SI^ v-.,nt1?
~"9"M ""2fv'? "3 $I HlV
..... ....004
~
C
2
.
o
-,
.~
o
-,~..
,"," :~ ~
in..':.:':" ;
. ,,0',0) ~
. . , ,
. . Ot
. .
^
/<j__h_
I; .
Ch,!j. .
I I,.
I I
'1,
: f
r'
I
I
J
I
I
I
J
I
. R------
Ii I
J i
I; i
I; i
.1 i ~
I t
~/
.. I
c-~
, .1
. \
,.
'4
r, r--------
. v
I
I
I
I
: i'
I
~~
B
!~~
.s. /0
DNINNVld
S1I31NIM
:~
.'
:'
~
(Q]
I
~
i
~
@j)
. ,
In]
:~
.
~
~ 0
!
~ ~
I
S~ II
nnl;)HIH).V :.A I
3JN311nVl ~ ,-
:"'.l.'>~ "1'lTlH::>
~J
:L Z
~ ~
z z
a~'~j ~:
. ~ .
.
~
o
,~
~
-....
t-t'?"9t1 <tV? "3''' t-U-v
u... uo,...
~
,
:w
~
,
./
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
.J
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign
contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the
City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following
information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application, bid,
contract, or proposal.
DOt-.! MAGEl<
If real property is involved, list the names of all persons having any ownership
interest.
DO~ MACk!'\'
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list
the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation.
or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
N.CJt-.J e:
3. If any person identified pursuant to (l) above is a non-profit organization or a
trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit
organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
NONE:"
4. Have you or any person named in (l) above had more than $250 worth of business
transacted with any member of City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and
Council within the past twelve months? Yes No-L If yes, please indicate
person(s)
5. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than
$1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period?
Yes No )(
.
If yes, state which Councilmember(s):
Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association,
social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate,
thi s and any other county, city and county, city, muni ci pali ty, di stri ct or other
political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as
Date: AD.<\!_ B \'1'1<..
neceV~m~
Signature of contractor/applicant
-1JOh~ Id 'M~,-~k
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
5~/~
WPC 0701 P
A-110
Ju:TZGATBD IIBGAT:IVB DBCLARATZOB
CZTY 0., CIIULa V:ISTA
PROJECT NAME: 4th & "E" Car Wash
PROJECT LOCATION: Northeast Corner of 4th Avenue and "E" street
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 566-190-16
PROJECT APPLICANT: Donald Macek and William Shields
CASE NO: IS-92-40
DATE: July 7, 1992
RELATED CASE: PCC-92-37
A. Proiect Settinq: The project site at 397 "E" Street consists
of 0.51 gross acres of flat land that is rectangular in shape.
The site was previously used as a gas station, which was
removed from the lot, and is therefore completely vacant of
any structures or landscaping. Surrounding land uses include
multi-family to the north and commercial to the east (camera
shop), south (bank) and west (gas station). The site
previously contained a gas station which has been removed.
The site is currently in a disturbed state as prior grading
took place to remove the underground tanks, structures and
buildings associated with the gas station.
B, Proiect Descriction: The applicants propose to construct a
3,159 square foot, full service car wash and detail service
facility on a 0.51 acre of land. The project will contain 10
parking spaces and generate from 200 to 900 daily trips.
Access will be from 4th Avenue.
C. Comcatibilitv with Zoninq and Plans: The Zoning Map shows
this land in the Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T) Zone. The
purpose of this district, as stated in section 19.50.010 of
the Zoning Ordinance, is to "provide areas in appropriate
locations adjacent to thoroughfares where activities dependent
upon or catering to thoroughfare traffic may be established,
maintained and protected." The proposed use requires a
conditional use permit per section 19.40.030 and is governed
by the provisions of Section 19.58.060,
D. Comcliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv:
1. Fire/EMS:
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and
medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7
,5./3
IS-92-40
Julv 7, 1992
Page 2
minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes
or less in 75% of the cases. The city of Chula Vista has
indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since
the nearest fire station is one-half mile away and would
be associated with a three minute response time. The
proposed project complies with this Threshold Policy.
Fire Department conditions of approval are listed in a
later section of the is report.
2. Police:
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units
must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes
or less and maintain an average response time to all
Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units
must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7
minutes or less and maintain an average response time to
all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed
project complies with this Threshold Policy.
3. Traffic:
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all
intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS)
"c" or better, with the exception that Level of service
(LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day
at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805
are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No
intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average
weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with
freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The
proposed project complies with this Threshold Policy.
4. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold Policy for parks and recreation facilities
does not apply to this project.
5 . Drainage
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that storm water
flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards.
Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City
Engineering Standards. The proposed project complies
with this Threshold Policy.
5'1J(
IS-92-40
Julv 7. 1992
Page 3
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows
and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards.
Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project complies with this
Threshold Policy.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate
storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are
constructed concurrently with planned growth and that
water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth
and construction. The proposed project is required, as
a mitigation measure to conserve water by reclaiming and
recycling it. with implementation of this mitigation
measure, the project will comply with this Threshold
Policy.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula vista
determined that the proposed project could have one or more
significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in
the project design have implemented specific mitigation
measures to reduce these effects to a level of less than
significant.
The project, as revised, now avoids or mitigates the
potentially significant environmental effects previously
identified, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact
Report will not be required. A Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared in accordance with section 15070 of the
State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures have also
been set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is
attached as Addendum "A".
The following impacts have been determined to be potentially
significant and are required to be mitigated to a level of
less than significant. A discussion of each of these
potentially significant impacts from the proposed projects
follows.
Potential Iv Siqnificant Impacts
1. Water Use Impacts:
Due to recent drought conditions, the applicant must
agree to no net increase in water consumption or
s.../~
15-92-40
Julv 7. 1992
Page 4
participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set
program the city of Chula vista has in effect at the time
of building permit issuance.
2. Noise Impacts:
The project will generate noise in excess of the minimum
requirements of the Municipal Code. A noise study, dated
June 26, 1992, was conducted by RECON and identified a
specific mitigation measure to reduce the noise impact to
below a level of significance.
3. Light and Glare Impacts:
The project will need outdoor lighting in the evening
hours, especially during winter months. Any outdoor
lighting must be designed and of a type so as not to
impact the neighboring uses, especially the residential
use immediately to the north.
Less Than siqnificant Impacts
4. Human Health Impacts:
The gas station that previously occupied the site has
been removed, including all underground tanks. Per
Addendum "B", the Hazardous Materials Management
Division's Underground Tank Removal/closure in Place
Report, no further action is required so far as cleaning
the site of toxic or hazardous materials is concerned.
Therefore, no mitigation measures are required in
relation to this issue.
5. Public Services Impacts:
The project is subject to school impact fees as this the
redevelopment of a parcel that has not been in use for
more than one year.
6. Visual Impacts:
Because the site is located in the C-T Zone on a scenic
highway (4th Avenue), the project must received Design
Review Committee approval and must reflect the Fourth
Avenue Residential Parkway standards described in Section
7.3 of the General Plan, and the Central Chula vista Area
Plan.
s,/(p
1S-92-40
Julv 7, 1992
Page 5
F. Mitiqation necessarv to avoid siqnificant effects:
Specific project mitigation measures have been required to
reduce potentially significant environmental impacts
identified in the initial study for this project to a level of
less than significant.
Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project
design and have been made conditions of project approval, as
well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring
Program (Addendum "A").
1. Water Mitiqation: The project shall reclaim and recycle
water that is used to wash cars.
2. Noise Mi tiqation: A noise attenuation wall shall be
erected along the northern property line to the standards
outlined in the noise study (Addendum "C").
3. Liqht and Glare Mitiqation: Lighting shall be designed
and of a type that does not affect adjacent parcels, to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
4. Public Services Mitiqation:
a. The applicant shall pay school fees as required by
the Chula Vista Elementary School District and
Sweetwater Union High School District prior to
issuance of any building permit.
b. The applicant shall submit a letter to the
Sweetwater Authority from the Chula Vista Fire
Department stating fire flow requirements.
5. Visual Mitiqation:
The project is subject to Design Review Committee
approval and Landscape Architect review. Compl iance with
all requirements of the Design Review Committee and the
city Landscape Architect will bring this project into
conformity with the Scenic Highways section of the
General Plan as it pertains to the Fourth Avenue
Residential Parkway. with compliance to these
requirements, potentially significant visual impacts will
be reduced to a level below significance.
G. Conditions of Proiect ADDroval:
Specific conditions of project approval are applicable to the
project. These are not mitigation measures to reduce any
environmental impacts, however, they are necessary to ensure
5'17
18-92-40
Julv 7, 1992
public health, safety and welfare and were identified as part
of the environmental review for this project. They are listed
here to ensure inclusion in the project's conditional
approval:
Page 6
1. The existing fire hydrant shall be relocated to the
satisfaction of the Chula vista Fire Department.
H. Findinas of 1nsianificant 1mcact
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the
project described above will not have a significant
environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs
to be prepared. .
1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of California history or prehistory.
The project does not have the potential to substantially
degrade the quality of the environment or reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species since the project
will not adversely impact rare or endangered plant or
animal species. This is an in-fill project on a
previously disturbed site. Development has taken place
on the site. No biological resources would be affected
by the proposal, and the potential for cultural resources
does not exist.
2 . The proj ect has the potential to achieve short-term
environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term
environmental goals.
Compliance with the conditions of proj ect approval listed
above will ensure that the proposed project is consistent
with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The
project would actually achieve long term goals by
developing a parcel of land in conformance with the
General Plan and other City standards. The site has no
significant agricultural or mineral potential.
3. The project has possible effects which are individually
limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the
subsection, "cumulatively considerable" lIeans that the
incremental effects of an individual project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
5 ~/ B
IS-92-40
Julv 7. 1992
ot past projects, the ettects ot other current projects,
and the ettects ot probable tuture projects.
Page 7
Incremental demand on natural resources, including water,
would contribute to the regional demand on these
resources. Adherence to standard building and
engineering requirements and recycling of used water will
mitigate these incremental effects to a level below
significance.
c.
The environmental ettects
substantial adverse ettects
directly or indirectly.
ot a project will
on human beings,
cause
either
The proposed project has not been found to cause
substantial direct or indirect effects on human beings,
since no human health impacts were identified in the
initial study.
H. Consultation:
1. Individuals and Oraanizations:
city of
Chula Vista:
Martin Miller, Associate Planner
Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and
Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Martin Schmidt, Parks and Recreation
Department
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Self
2 . Documents
Chula Vista General Plan
Title 19, Zoning Ordinance
5 -/9
IS-92-40
Julv 7, 1992
PcK;Je 8
3. Initial Studv: This environmental determination is based
on the attached Initial study as well as any comments on
the Initial study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
Further information regarding the environmental review of
the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
")7(<< l L ( d. iLl l C ) I" L U 'c
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
July 7, 1992
DATE
5',0
CITY DATA
F, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
1.
Current Zonina on Site:
North
South
East
West
Case No. .Ts -9'1- 0../-0
c:/
'1<, ")
(JT
f":i
/''/
Does the project conform to the current zoning? ~s
[oJ CI/,P
2.
General Plan land use
designation on site:
North
South
East
West
~F TJ4IL ('/7I11J1o~(AI
'cTJ-III/..fI 1<e'5! ",,..,AL (j1-llrd.J;/)
PI: rA II (' ot'l"J /I1rl(It<!'-
1<"77"" /cJJ'71frrr1(I/"i
A' f. f}1// (",,-)r11 I;' -/( /,cL
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use
Diagram? y'o, (' v P
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space
or adjacent to an area so designated? ^/()
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ~L)
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect
or enhance the scenic quality of the route.)
3. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the
following:
School
Permanent
Capacity
Temporary
Capacity
CUrrent
Enrollment
Students
Generated
Fran Pro;ect
Elem.
Jr. High
Sr. High
N/i1
~
4 . Remarks:
Director of Planning or Representative
Date
5, :z ,
City Data Sheet
Page 2
Case No.
IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
1.
Indicate which of the following issues have been
having potentially significant environmental
should be addressed in the Negative Declaration.
not intended to be all-inclusive.
identified as
effects and
This list is
7'
Aesthetic/Visual
Agricultural Land
Air Quality
Archaeological/Historical
Zoning/General Plan
Drainage/Absorption
Economic/Jobs
Fiscal
Flood Plain/Flooding
Forest Land/Fire Hazard
Geologic/Seismic
Minerals
Noise
Population/Housing Balance
Public Services/Facilities
Recreation/Parks
::z
Schools/Universities
Septic Systems
Sewer capacity
SOil/Erosion/Compaction/Grading
Solid Waste
Toxic/Hazardous
Traffic/Circulation
Vegetation
Water Quality
Water Supply/Groundwater
Wetland/Riparian
Wildlife
Growth Inducing
Land Use
Cumulative Effects
Other
II. A summary of each issue checked yes or maybe should be
provided below.
s' ~ ~
City Data Sheet
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PORK
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Page 3
Background
1. Name of Proponent -:-D~Nt4L7) m.4C' ~K.
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent 3~/'2, ;+"'fII..", A~"
..;: A.J ~)"~O,' Cfr 41;./t:) ~ ;L~'3- 715'00
3. Date of Checklist ~h,/t:f2.
4. Name of Proposal 4-e. .J.. s C fA r L.J"" ",J
5. Initial Study Number :I:' 'S -'1;;7 .10
Environmental Impacts
(Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on
attached sheets.)
1. Earth. Will the proposal result in:
YES MAYBE HQ
d.
e.
f.
g.
a.
Unstable earth conditions or changes
in geologic substructures? 0
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil? 0
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features? 0
c.
The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features? 0
Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site? 0
Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siltation,
deposition or erosion which may modify
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake? 0
Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mud slides, ground failure,
or similar hazards? 0
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
if
~
~
rr(
~
~
rif
5. 2. 3
,
,
city Data Sheet
2. Air. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
quality? 0
The creation of objectionable
odors? 0
b.
c.
Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? 0
3. Water. will the Proposal result in:
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters? 0
b.
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff? 0
c,
Alterations to the course or flow
of flood waters? 0
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body? 0
Discharge into surface waters, or
any alteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity? 0
Alteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters? 0
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer
by cuts or excavations? 0
Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available for pUblic water
supplies?
7<<,yr!e (;..)o.f~r
o
o
'0
o
g"
Page 4
o
0'
o
!0'
o
~
o
~
o
~
g
o
o
Gr'
~
~
~
o
s' ~ i.f
city Data Sheet
i.
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves? 0
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Change in the diversity of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)? 0
b.
Reduction of
unique, rare
of plants?
the numbers of any
or endangered species
o
c.
Introduction of new specfes of
plants into an area, or 1n a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
o
d.
Reduction in acreage of any
agricultural crop?
o
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
b.
c.
d.
a.
Change in the diversity of species,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or
insects)? 0
Reduction of
unique, rare
of animals?
the numbers of any
or endangered species
o
Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals? 0
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlife habitat? 0
6, Noi8e. will the proposal result in:
a.
Increases in existing noise
levels?
'5t:P ",Jot'co 5~j,,"
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
Page 5
~
~
tI
rif
if
r/
~
~
~
o
SO" .2. 5
;
City Data Sheet
b.
Exposure of people to severe
noise levels?
o
7.
Light and Glare. will the proposal
produce l)ew. light or alare? . 0
J ,',.,:./,,-d ~'S"T ~.:....,":>, d,~c"f !:':/ /',J.{I'j Vv""Y
4 <,f'J ,. ~ ; c t'r J., . "'r s.
Land Use. will the proposal result in
a substantial alteration of the present
or planned land use of an area? 0
8.
r/
o
9. Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources? 0
10. Risk of Upset. will the proposal involve:
a.
A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions? 0
Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
11. Population. will the proposal alter
the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population
of an area? 0
b.
o
12. Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing? 0
o
o
o
o
o
Page 6
o
[!(
o
rif
~
8'
g
~
~
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movement?
o
b.
Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking?
Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems?
o
o
c.
o
o
o
~
~
rif
oS. :2."
City Data Sheet
d.
Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? 0
o
o
Page 7
o
rI
cI
e.
Alterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? 0
~
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon,
or result in a need for new or altered governmental
services in any of the following areas:
f.
Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? 0
a.
Fire protection? 0
Police protection? 0
b.
c.
Schools? 0
J. :;;...1.......
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities? 0
e.
Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? 0
.. Ii/c...."',.. - ,.
f.
other governmental services? 0
15. Energy. will the proposal result in:
a.
Use of substantial amount of fuel
or energy? 0
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? 0
b.
16. Thresholds. Will the proposal
adversely impact the city's Threshold/
Standards policies? 0
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a.
Creation of any health hazard or
potential health hazard (excluding
mental health)? 0
o
o
u(
o
[il'
o
o
o
o
o
~
ri'
o
~
o
/
Gr
cg/
GY
m/
~
5,2. ?
City Data Sheet
b.
Exposure of people to potential
health hazards?
o
18. Aesthetics. will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal result in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view? 0
19. aecreation. will the proposal result
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational
opportunities? 0
20. Cultural Resources.
a.
will the proposal result in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
o
b.
will the proposal result in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or
object?
o
c.
Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values? 0
d.
will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred. uses
within the potential impact area? 0
21. Mandatory Findinqs of Siqnificance.
a. Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
Page 8
o
lit"
o
ri
o
~
o
~
o
~
o
~
o
~
5- '2"B
city Data Sheet
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
o
b.
Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage or long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) 0
c.
Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
butcumulatively considerable? (A
project may impact two or more
separate resources where the
impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.) 0
d.
Does the proj ect have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either directly
or indirectly? 0
Page 9
o
Gi
o
,
o
lif'
o
lif'
5-21
City Data Sheet
~ID
III. Determination
o
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
g'
o
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a
significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a
significant effect on the environment, there will not be
a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added
to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE
PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect
on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required.
Date
Signature
For
IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES
!fQ..
~
,
~
:1fL
List all significant or potentially significant impacts
identified in the Initial Study checklist form:
YES
~
~ ---=-.
3~
lie
I
-, Q
MAYBE
./'
COMMENT
,1',~
-,~ -, -~ /. - /
.'1 /, f'{I. .._
u.... .,....... I,~; "',
'1: -',.,"-,. ~ ~
r. _.-1
"..-<. ,
...:,;.
-
.......'
~':t' ,
".
" ,'-. ~
_.I_t!A._"
" ""..1,,',
,/
-':
.,
.,
"I
v
l'
/
v
-- St.' ,'" '. ~ ~., IJ <I
.;
,;
D .. ,} ./
/,;,.1>"....-.._ '1
, ,
I; (in."'{,
I
",';;:'::"'::-'.;
/ - ..;;.:.....U... ( C' ~
0...:' ,'cr--
v
fd ;A'~c'
/_/';;'i:-{..~ ~''''C(t
5-3d
.
..
"ECE::lEJ
ROUTING FORM .,l1f OF CHULA ViS 1 A
,,"NC,!NE:::R!NG DEPT
1992 APi 14 AM II: 32
DATE: April 13, 1992
/
~
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf,Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
80b Leiter, Planning Dir~ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
F/-<J,.., :
rROH~ 7U
SUBJECT:
Maryann Mi 11 er
Environmental Section
rn Application for Initial Study (IS- 92-40 /FA- 578 IDP - 927 )
D Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR- /FB- IDP )
0 Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- IFB- /DP )
0 Review of Environmental Review Record FC- IERR- )
.
.
The project cons.ists of:
Full Service Car Wash
Location:
397 "E" Str~et (Northeast corner of 4th & ESt)
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 4/21/92 .
Comments:
--
5,3/
~
)"$- S ~~
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Case No. rS. C)~- S-O
1. Drainaoe
a.
Is the project site within a flood plain? ~l)
If so, state which FEHA Floodway Frequency 80undary ~.IJ4
b.
What is tne location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? ..IVOJUL
c.
Are they adequate to serve the project? .IV / A
If not, explain briefly. .
d.
What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilities? TWD CbJ/tLJ uvLr"73' AT ~ ~.IE
Cbtt.JV~~ ~ rDU.-m AV~.JUb' A.lUD fl.,. S7>>~~-r- '7';N,JII-?-CONNrC.7
on. A ':J.s'M)( ~~.. CS',A "",,If.,... ,...~q.,$ 'N~ A 'D.Aep ~c" ,...~"t.d' 'N 71k..
Are they adequate to serve the project? ~.s'. ' ~61J7'1I~1t1."" Ollhcn-.,
If not, explain briefly.
e.
2. TransDortation
a. What roads provide prima.!'y access to the project? rDull-rJ!
AtI<lVu<. ANI) "/!',, S~u-r:
WPC 9459P
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)? 9~
c.
What is the ADT and estimated
project completion?
8efore
A,D. T, F'ouI.7U A~c. 17 ., 'to .
"E'O $7Z~rr . //iJ ~/O
L.O.S. F"~TH A'
.~#I r?: ~
level of service before and after
After
/8 '-I'lL)
} 9,) ,~ 0
A
I!.
If the A,D.T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain
briefly. . ~/A
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. ~s
-14-
5, a. ~
Case No. 'XS- ;~- S>'t>
f.
e. Are there any intersections at or near the pOint that will
result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)? ~o
If so, identify: Location HIA
Cumulative L.O.S.
Is there any dedication required? ~~~
If so, please specify. E"v.,s7i",G It..O.IN, ON Fcof,'1f/ A,,(, IS (JO'.
~ <:.v. 1'J~6'~1.J S-Ti4wIJAW Foil A f;"-~Aw<.. hJt1&"~ IS" ~DU'.
7"}k. r....,m.,'- /I. .0,"". Dill "r" $T1tu-r"S t}o'. '77oIc. C."', ~"'N ~OAIl.D 'S'lJ.
Is there any street widening required? ~F~
If so, please specify. 7'Nt.. ~'S'7iIflE- ~AK'I(""'LuoA"" Q,/V "E" S''f'll...-r"
'~Y.- 7'1I-t c.". S"""'n.4~LJ D't!.I'If'~J 1.r ~8.
,
g.
h.
Are there any other street improvements required?
If so, please specify the general nature of
improvements.
.11/0
the necessary
3.. Soils
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
project site? tJ.A/k.I/JOW~
b. If yes, specify these conditions. ~/A
4.
c. Is a soils report necesspry? YeS'
land Form
a. What is the average natural slope of the site? I ~.
b. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? ~ /.
Noise
5.
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting' the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant? .Ai 0
6. Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the
proposed project per day?
Solid tJo Il!s / DAy L10uid ':1 7/0 t: / DAY
.
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or
downstream from the site? R" vc,o Nv F"oLIII!7?I Ave.. F~J"nNt:
IJIU 77h... SOV7lH Ill/I'" DJAv-,- ?':D~.
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? )-~~,
WPC 9459P
-15-
s'~
,
Case No. :r:S- ,~- S-o
7. Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts,
mitigation measures, or other issues.
r ntative
i~jqv
Date
WPC 9459P -16-
s~ :. L(
ROUTI NG FORM
DATE: April 13, 1992
~.
TO:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering {EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf. Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department "
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation .::..
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Dir~ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Maryann Mi ller
Environmental Section
m
D
o
D
Application for Initial Study (IS- 92-40
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
Review of Environmental Review Record
IFA- 578
IFB-
/F8-
FC-
927 )
)
)
)
IDP -
IDP
/DP
/ERR-
".
.
The project cons.ists of:
Full Service Car Wash
Location:
397 "E" Street (Northeast (;orner of 4th & ESt)
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 4/21/92
Comments:
"
\~c... ~~ ~O
~ ~~~.
~ -,.
~~~
~~.
5' :J S
Case No. /S.P2-Po
H-l. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. How many
project?
2. How "any acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service
District of this project IS shown in the_r,!ks and Recreation Element
of the General Plan? (If applicable) ~.
3. What are the current park acreage rlRuirements in the Park Service
District? (If applicable) tI,""-.
4. Is project subject to Parks & Recreation Threshold requirements? ~
If not, please explain.
of parkland are necessary to serve the proposed
5. Are existin9 neighborhood and community parks near the project
adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project?
Neighborhood
Community Parks
-
-
6. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part
of the project adequate to serve the population increase?
Neighborhood
Community Parks
-
-
7. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds
established by City Council policies?
~
8. To meet City requirements, will
~
10)0
applicant be required to:
Provide land?
Pay a fee?
9. Remarks:
~ f. ~~~
Parks and Recreation Director or Representative
-3 ."Z{ .f:{?
Date
-S;,3~
WPC 9459P
-18-
DATE: April 13, 1992
1t:
~rt.'
f!BI: 70;
SUBJECT: [JQg
D
o
D
ROUTING FORM
....
RECEIVED
.4~)~ -I ',C
Ken Larson, Building & Housing PLANNING
John Lippitt, Engineering {EIR only) - . .
Cliff Swanson. Engineering EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg. Engineering EIR only)
Roger Daoust. Engineering (IS/3. EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf.Assi~tant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove. Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
80b Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Lei ter, Pl anni ng Di rl1ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, library (Final EIR)
Other
Ma ryan" Mill er
.
Environmental Section
Application for Initial Study (IS- 92-40
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
Review of Environmental Review Record
.
The project cons,ists of:
Location:
Full Service Car Wash
/FA- 578
/FB-
/FB-
FC-
/DP - 927 )
/DP )
/DP )
/ERR- )
-
397 "E" Str~et (Northeast corner of 4th & ESt)
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 4/21/92 .
Comments:
-'"
-5".37
CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
PLAN CORRECTION SHEET
Address 4!i- i 'E' sr, Plan Filfo,c:Q. 4oChecker~ Date 4//4 /C;).
Type Constr7- Iv' Occupancy 13-d-. No. Stories Bldg, Area ;)/ IS-I 1/1
The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions.
PROVIDE AND SHOW ON PLAN:
.
[. G.e.-9-1-f. z:)0 S-7/~
4-rh -1 "f'Sr Sa
CA /J /ZA- rl fl.
, v
J /UtA> f- (J AJ ;14< Co /C.d /liE/l.
ns ~Ol ~ h Leek. ~-
d - fA,u/dr (;2..).;2.4 jo15C z-)(,-hA/,;u~'jj,Uj.'
(;) ~ h'l LoCA-hiJ /:-v df:k'( /7-A-~?'f (/) u'C-A-f;{)
/'J CuS-loH2t<. Me,//-. S-h' U'~s.t:<;l./ h'i I-&v,(.J/cf)_
AJ6 T HM< 1M/\.> j r<.. - ~ ~
~ f- It( -.h;"'SV;SbA .
/
FPB-29
5,38
Case No. /s 92 -Y'6>
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire statio.n1 And what is the
Fire Department's estimated reaction time? -.:. ~/U-
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? }/~5
'3. Remarks
t2 ~. J~
FJte Marshal
4//4/7d-
Date
WPC 9459P
-17-
s- Br
ROUTING FORM
DATE: April 13, 1992
~1
~
SUBJECT:
/
11 G'J""";Jnll. ~ n
n I r- ". , r' " .
U I ... : "; ,
~ APR~~~~~2 ~
L::J \:::7L_-,U u
-.-.................--..----.......
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf. Assi!tant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Dir~ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
Maryann Mi 11 er
.
Environmental Section
rn Application for Initial Study (Is- 92-40
c==J Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
o Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
c==J Review of Environmental Review Record
.
.
The project cons.ists of:
Location:
Full Service Car Wash
/FA- 578
IFB-
/FB-
FC-
lOP - 927 )
/DP )
/DP )
/ERR- )
397 "E" Str~et (Northeast corner of 4th & ESt)
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 4/21/92
COlTVllents:
;/!ltd !<All' I
/10 ~ ~,
cur tiP 7/7Z--
.
S-'fC)
ROUTING FORM
DATE: April 13, 1992
/
TO:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering ~EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf.. Assi!tant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Dir~ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final ErR)
Othe r
.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ma ryann Mill er
Environmental Section
rn Application for Initial Study (IS- 92-40
c==J Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
o Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
c==J Review of Environmental Review Record
/FA- 578
/FB-
/FB-
FC-
/DP - 927 )
/DP )
/DP )
/ERR- )
.
The project cons.ists of:
Full Service Car Wash
Location:
-
397 "E" Str~et (Northeast corner of 4th & ESt)
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 4/21/92
.
COlTVllents: d - 7/.,..."L.
C~ ch --.f-w'~~ P/I-e
f . %
1/~f7- r
c hJf C/ti-tt ~~
5--Y/
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS. Ph.D.
LARRY CUNN INGHAM
SHARON GILES
PATRICK A JUDD
GREG R. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN. Ph.D.
CHULA VIb....'A ELEMENTARY SCHOVL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425"9600
EACH CHILD IS AN INDNIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
April 15, 1992
R12C12I\/12Q
Ms. Maryann Miller
Environmental Review Dept.
city of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
PLANNING
RE: 1S-92-40 / FA-578/ DP-927
Location: 397 "E" street
Project: Full Service Car Wash
Applicant: Donald Macek
Dear Ms. Miller:
This is to advise you that the project, located at 397 "E"
Street, is within the Chula vista Elementary School District
which serves children from Kindergarten through Grade 6.
District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 4-5
percent over the past several years, and this is projected
to continue. Permanent capacity has been exceeded at many
schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being
utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District
also buses students outside their attendance areas, both to
accommodate growth and assist in achieving ethnic balance.
state law currently provides for a developer fee of $.26 for
non-residential area to be charged (Chula Vista Elementary
School District $.12/square foot; Sweetwater Union High
School District $.14/square foot. Fees increase to $.27
on May 18, 1992) to assist in financing facilities needed to
serve growth.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
~~
Kate Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KS:dp
cc: Donald Macek
Laurence Winters
5> - J{ &i<."
JWEETWATER AUTHORln
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91912-2328
(619) 420-1413
FAX (619) 425-7469
R.ECE/VED
GOVERNING BOARD
SUE JARRETT, CHAIRMAN
BUD POCKlINGTON. VICE CHAIRMAN
WAYNE W. SMITH
EDWIN J. STEELE
GEORGE H. WATERS
MARGARET A. WELSH
CARY F. WRIGHT
PLANNING
WANDA AVERY
TREASUREA
DIAN J. REEVES
SECRETARY-ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE
City of Chula Vista Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Subject:
WATER AVAILABILITY
397 "E" STREET, CHULA VISTA
A.P.N. 566-190-16, INITIAL STUDY NO. IS-92-40
NORTHEAST CORNER OF "E" STREET AND FOURTH AVENUE
Gentlemen:
This letter is in response to the subject initial study for the referenced project within the Sweetwater
Authority service area. There is a 16-inch A,C, water main in Fourth Avenue adjacent to the proposed
development. Our records indicate one existing service to the proposed development. Enclosed is a
copy of 1/4 SEC. 136 map which shows these facilities.
At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide domestic service
and/or fire protection. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority
from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, this Droiect
may result in a need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system.
If the Owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement for water facility
improvements with the Authority, water service can be obtained at a pressure range from a maximum
of 85 p.s.i. to a minimum of 60 p.s.i.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Tom Justo at (619) 420-1413, ext. 239.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
Richard A. Reynolds
Chief Engineer
RAR:T J:ln
k: \Iorelei\ wp51 \397EST.ltr
enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 136 map
A Public Agency.
Serving National City. Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
5-#3
-~ I r~
~- :--;;; ....T ~J J '.~
r ~!;JS _I' 1. . i -.- ~~=.: ..
~ :1, "'~ ~ 1M
( :::. "'~ 0 ~. J: r
~ .-2" ~
.. .IM. j. . !:j I.' :
: 2~ u.' (J) . Js. J rv I~ III __ r----. ~..a 0 ,.... ~ ~ l
~ ~I / ~. I 7....... If'
~ ~ - :..1 .;2\'" .~~ I' v""S C\Ji rY'\"
+- I"O~~ ;; ~'''1..: --...... Ii :1 \. J ~:1';.., r-
~ 'F""'.' r ~. V .',.!_ ;.m}fflle/\e:J~ :
! r" \, . ._V~ ~ il-'.!h..",,<.. O! JO!Jd S"~ :, I
.~ Ll - . '~~'v - ~ i '$~ <-<-v 'JJc'.r'vr;;~-:R~/~"M O,.,J
~. .. -- ~'jt ~~:r~" P/!j "q lSn" n 1/2J . I: _ '
~ · L. ',. /'r/-N.,OI1)-.S J..!!~.<..41tJO/":J S'C"'~. I "I"
~: .. . ' Prl ~o~.. .,..... 'tJ . 0/ "le' ~ ,- ~ I I'
- ~ ..,"", ~ ; .'~Q ~'!~:: O!l JJo 0, I. -.;~ I I
.~.. '. L-J i: ~ 'N ! ~h~ t!.~.!/,~ .,{, _ ~tJ! p. 'l:J. ,. ,... I ,;;'y,
.... r'r.:" ..,- .:../.." '/~ ',"/1, ,... L.t; l ,__ I .".101 .
~""''': v ',. u....K~.."..>....1 ..........,."'.... MI.. ~ .~-r-
~:;'.~;1' '.J. I I "-.....,,./ I I' ..<,..~....'I ""1_'('0' ,. ~s,.~'~r 1:1
I .e . 21 i
.~~'.~ i .~! ~~~J~~J J ~~ ~I ~ ~ (f ~! ~~~~ fl
fill -= o. :.. ~
.~:~.. .11~ -. .-= I~;~-:~ ~-- ~~>~-.~: uj ~; h ~ r
:c ~. - N. -.' J ~ "'~:J f: ~C\J&l')~; ;. .....0 1~ 0 ~~ "I
::> .... . ~ ~.. :: ..... .... . ". Ii ... l
:-:: , f.~I" S ;~ =. !. 1- ~ i ,~ I ~ of ..z= , i .~ . ~;:Io .
~L~ ..Ie fdlh'" , ~ f I~
.. t~___ -f.--"""-t=r. -~.,..- ~f.--~r-""-~ -- ""0..
';;; f::~ ',_n...., I""'''' I .I"..~.I.'I """'r- o'r-nul I '~I "i"" _. f';,:~ I ", .,......."" "'r~.
,:~~:~: .~,,-~ ~IP.~~l: ~. ~ ~~ ..~I\ f'!OljIY .~:f: 1 .:i~~~::r
. . J. >- = - - 9.;'"- .. II C .. 0" 0 I
., ... .. ,... -0 "eft l1li IC.,.... ~ f'\IoI -_~.qI' -,.T------- 1 ..
". : 2:.:n . ~j."" \:J;; ~f" <t~ Z I'<J 1- <(~;,,- ~: :- -: -: -! -= "j"" : ~ ,,'! l
i~O~ '01- .. [r J i. ..: : l
.... .~ ~ z z : : :. L_ nt5':''i.._ - .
r~ or. --- --- ---- ____ ____ ___ .__ ___ ___ ___ __"'___L..__./ I "!
~ _n w- _u n_ Un _n .u_ '""__n ___ __ :...,. + ,"
-mui 1...- - i~~Ii- I :
- .. " a.... .. - ...... ~ No. ..... --::.: =:,., "'; ,..,;:c ,.; ~Q =:: .-: i::~ I o.
I: . :~ : : '::' ~ ~ . fa...:. ":'c:iCl I..
I ;.; .;: . . . . " ... :i ... ".~~,
I' : I I; · ; . ;; .. . ~. .,' if,... "
')..loN 0 ~ 06".. OM ""Jo
- . fiT . 'ron I' r . "
:>t:"=: i !~.! H '3^T t i.L.L3~.~_
~...~ _.J___.1c ',.. . _;1 II:
r~ ~JON.... I 1,1
----------... I I I
--- I ,. I :
I"~'.' ,>, :." J f-L.------- " L--{
, - ~;"'i:_;.;-- - 1 I
L.li--unui ' ~!
, ~ I
· "i-- I
~ ~ar- J.'-:~-u I (.------ ---:-r-t}J
e t 1 I 1
.... I - ~brr:;-.;j-- -., I .
, II :
_CLI i- :1 , I
i-.oc ~ ,---11 :
"0'. ~ ".;1 " I
......;,- ': ,,, , .t.
". I ,~
1'-1..... . 1 r.... I I~
'],0 1_' -j..ts... :: q I: :!
rOM ,I. ,~..; ~::: I~ I
'-,'....: ., ~ d - I I 1
~.. U I..C....O..
~ d .c
"... .
...., .
'Ie)
"c;1.'t1
'9'1'11
_n
-
--
~.'
.
~
"
...,
i
.
!
&~
j! ~ '., "
i i '0 j
.~
~
II
" .: .0 ~
a oN a= .s:
. .. ~;
".
.
,0
'.0
I .',
I H.E~rio.:l ~
~(J1tIz ,) ~
=: I ...,
.
'-
,.
"
, '.. I;
:. ,f' . . .~
;,. - .
N_
~ ,: n .
.1
,
r
I
I
I
I
L
"I"'.OM "'"'
.K.
r'. "1"-00 ..._~! ~ r
" I
.1 ~ !
w ~ 0 L
ij. 'J.'
.:-:zi 1 ~ ,.
r.' I. ~ 2'.. . I
1'!1;= r..... I ~ I
) . "'8 dJ, II
I ... W'iJ!. i
~ i ~.. ~~T"~'-7:
. I ~31\~ ~I '.
a ! l,;r" "FI-.I" r
: ! Z.., " '
::i..~ ~ I" I
~ ~ ~. I
:' 0):B,;!~:
~ ~ l~~""21.!
, : i I ",<><,,,o:~ I . ~ I
I " f\.-'H30 9 ~".. L_
, .
.oc.. ~~,;:Io I -~ ~
'-'~ .. .
:~ "i~ I :~a
]"' .r r-
.' ~ - I
:: ,,--1
~ ~
en
.,.
~ l
Ii Wi'-
:
;; "
~.,
"
~
.
z
,
9 ~ d1I~ 'lJ S3" ~
;... ..--=-
- :1.;: .-_
!:~i;:'~
· . t lOt ;j .. 11
......1 .~
!
r,li
.
.
N
.
-~
h/Y
, I~V)
aM-
I ~ ex.- a '-
~::\o.. ".
",.,t""", 1\." Ii
j
.,..,
."
I
;
~
i
~
~
.
.
:
~
.s,J,fo/
Sweetwater Union High School District
AOMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91911-2896
(619) 691.5500
Division of Planning and Facilities
April 16, 1992
R12C€JV12D
. ~
PLANNING
Mr. Douglas Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Reid:
Be: IS-92-4O - Full Service Car Wash
The above subject project will have an impact on the Sweetwater Union High
School District. Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to
Government Code No. 65995 (Developer Fees) prior to issuance of building
permit.
C,/y,
;l#J/tdP#---
Thomas Silva
Assistant Director of Planning
TS/ml
s-J{.5
RECEIVED
NOTICE OF INITIAL STUDY
'-' ,. ,~
PLANNING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Environmental Review Coordinator of
the City of Chula Vista is conducting an Initial Study (IS) to determine
if the project identified and described below will have a significant
impact on the environment. If the project may have a significant
effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report will be
prepared to evaluate the environmental consequences of the project.
If the project will not have a significant environmental impact or
if mitigation measures have been included in the project which will
' avoid any significant impacts, a Negative Declaration will be prepared.
This determination does,not constitute approval or rejection of the
proj ect.
The IS application, project description and other material are on
file and available for public review at the Chula Vista Planning Department,
Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
Any comments on this Initial Study must be presented in writing to
the Environmental Review Coordinator, P.O. Box 1087, Chula Vista,
CA 92012, prior to 5:00 p.m. on April 24, 1992. '
If you have any questions or comments on this IS, please call the
Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department at
. (619) 691-5101.
Project Description:. Full Service Car Wash
.
Project Location: 397 "E" Street (Northeast corner of 4th & E Street)
Project Applicant:
DO",ld~ ~. ~ ~' /Jri
~D~~d 0~((;C\ J ~4 z:
Environmental Review Coordinator W ~ ~ -rt1,; ~
€ p- !I~/
2*~
S..L/(p
Date: April 14, 1992
Case No:
IS-92-40
EN 5 (Rev. 12/82)
Ms Roxanne Stoner
Chula Vista Inn
171 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
(619) 420-871111
Jy~
C'€:"/V
, , I2:b
.b(-4I\1J\,1
'/I\IC
Mr. Douf,las D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
P.O. Box 1087
Chul,1 Visto, Californi8 92012
RE: IS-92-40
DCur Mr. Reid,
;hocnk you for thc Notice of Initi3J. Stury for a full service C3r
>l2sh locc:ted at ~97 "E" Street (Northllest corner of 4th ,md E
street) . (<,Iso, thonk you the opportunity to oomment beo3use this
project \lould h2ve a negative m~jor impoct upon our opcr;Jtions,
nnd on the h021th of our residents.
Our ini ti;:31 concerns on this project are listed bclm;:
1) Ir;creoseci traffic and the type of emploYE'es and
customers t.ris t.ype of facilit.y \,:ould at.traet.. ~12ny of
Ollr resid~tlts walk to the librnry an~ tte central
business district. of ChuliJ Vista. They typically \-l21k
p8st this corner. The t.raffic 8lone \"ill prevent t.hem
fron! usin[; your library unci dict:;tc Ii vine; a more
rec] usi ve lifr>styl('. II conver;icnce st.ore is dircct.] y
c-cross the street.. The nort!1C'rn interspct.ion would be
" t.raffic sniJrl from car t.urnin[ into these tHO
facilities.
2) The nCC8ti v<, imp8ct. on the iJir qUCJlity this proposod
facility would create. At the very lCi1st, an incre<Jse
in hUl1'idi ty, which would carry l1'.<Jny harmful items to
our older Chula Vist,"] citizens, many of \Ihom hove
respatory problems. Along Hith the humidity would be
the deter8cnts, waxes and petroleum products, carried
by the moisture and breathed by our residents.
FolloHing our first concerns of increased <Juto traffic
is the increased emission fron the increased tr2ffic,
typicaJ ly at 10\1 engine RPM, which creote even more
airborne pollutants, directly impocting the health of
our residents. I am appalled this type of facility
would be pllowed in a residential area, considering
your Haster Plan one zoninc; philosophy.
3) Gn street p8rking is already 3 problem. He are
continu21Jy cf:esine 2H2Y unauthorized Cnrs, piJrkinrr in
Out" lot. The car wush will only increose this prohlem.
5~+t'?
Also of paramount. concern is the economic imp8ct this project
,!ould creatc. Car ,mshcs are typically "tax payer" type of uses,
highly speculativE' in nature. This use appears to be a jerk knee
reaction to the recession and not a Hell conceivec utility cf the
site to enhancc thc ncighborhood or the city. The "Chula Vista
Inn", a long term citizen (one O\mer for over ten years), would
see it's v21ue diminished by the degrading of the neighborhood by
the addition of this industrial, freewGY interchange type of land
US0. Our 8bil i ty to attract tenants \-Iould be diminished, and our
2bility to keep rents at competitive rates llould be reduce by
this, less than residentiwl type of land use.
I ,:ould like to repeat our opposition to t.he full servic~ cew
Ilash phoned fer the corner of IIt.h [, E street. The incre8sed
tr~1ffic, noisp, porkinp" cmd 8irborne pollution is re,'son enour;!;
for us, locC!~cd] ess th2n 100 feet frorr: the site. Also the type
of c'Jst.om'21's the preposed facili t.y HOU Id nttract. along \lith the
cotJ\fenic:nt store; across the stre(:;t, h'oulrl imp(<ct the fn:~('don: our
rc:sid'2ni:s enjoy to lJ21k to th'2 libr<:lry and othCi ret2iJ stores
servicinc tllis est8blishcd rrsicienti81 2rC3.
l,\fC feel (:; cnr \-Josh 1tiould cEstrnct from the qU0int rc;sirlenti~:l
neie~iborhood \-:c at "Chulo Vistf.~ Inn" h2ve tried to m2int2in 8S
cst(::blishe(~ tz:x p2ying cj,tizens of Cr.u18 Vis~L_'.
Thcnk you for your tir,:c
"~~~ ~
!\dr.:inistrator
S-<V3
RECEIVED
Api11J/5) 149l
L:. '. "Cj; ~~'E>'\1181~20o?l~\',>
t.? A 't
PLANNING ~ PH 1992 ~
1=" 4- - ~ R. C I..-L ~ c...!!.eceiv8a &
F:.V\V \ Rc>V'\V'{\~\ ~ .Q.. '1\.lN0 c>D'rcj r Y\ Dv\O ~ ':~nl ~
C tt v.. 0 (' C. hD \ 0..... V \ S \ CA. "'~.9$ Q"{}~
<:2J ~ l>e,n_"'"
1~1J( P'f"D pbs..Qd c Ou~ Wcv;L~ /~q7 E. ~i\..Q.Q.,+
C VI, \J lC\. V IIS+~ I S d~ LQ,+.QJ1.i D V S ~ 0 h 0 VvI,Q D L0 vtV s
\1.Q c&-tC\ i l-) ~ 0I.f--2- ~ .
, W.S2. ()J'lQ Q,\ \' ~Qcl';1., S LJ ~ ~lUl..-,'V\ 9," \ \ .~-<;~ct
+0 our hJ2ccQ-th CJ~ o~-.QJ b~ ~ 't(~~oo..s
OJvv\.O u V\ t o~ ~h-CA.-\-\ \ (, 0 V\'~ 0 V ~ A \Jjvv\.. u~, .
Th~ Qxh~si ~ \J,^^,~ P ourl '" q ~ ID\>V'..1Y'ucb-
bvs.QS - c('~s)..Q tc. ~ Is Gtl f..QoJi >A. ~n\M-~t~
tD ttJ. h.Q~ o~. ~ ourl h I~ VJ r-f2~1, ~ts, I.t
~.~ \\oi ~C\'1o -t 0 fh-l f&-opl.Q W~\D ~lC\V.x iVtV-.Q51~d
\V\ hO\M...Q...S o~ 1-t\ti +0 ksu1jJ2..<:l..Qd. +0
\ V\ c c.Q.c~ \v\1-.Q/vv\02 c.O}'v^"b US1,'DY\ .~q \ vL-t
:S \N\ 0 ~ "Cf.Q GL t.Q. d b d 0-. J d "\1" l D LiI. cJ) ~ 0 Y\I\ Co> bIb
\ V\. M CVU2-A.. , ,
\Ivu? c..CVLuJ~~-w'-fr\~ WDu\d ~ld +0
fu cvii\c.C\..~ {O["<^--\~1C P\D~t~?> L0h,c h
Q \ 'CQ_D--d '1 QX is i O\..t -:4 -tl1 auv..~ [ . .
C\k wo\:)\c1 CZRG"'-Q.C\^(A1-.Q fu V\OVDSo..Q ~.
d~\~~ ~D' tM.. S.~\~ ojy- iC<<-~~5
~..Q a.2th - . ~~ ~D( \I) () C) ~ v..Q.--OJLcJVI
~d-\vJ\ \
I~/ ~ I~A
C h u / C{ VI s q- q (9 ( 0
.s-'I1
RECEIVED
APRIL 22, 1992
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL SECTION
276 FOURTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
RE: FULL SERVICE CAR WASH (IS-92-40)
PLANNING
After reviewing the printed material on this initial study at the City Planning
Department, a major discrepancy was noted between the project description and the
plans drawn for the Car Wash. On the project description it states there willbe
an auto and pedestrian entrance on E Street and an exit on the north to Fourth
Ave. There is no such entrance on the drawing.
Several othe items have caused me some concern. The plans call for ten (10)
parking spaces. Are these parking spaces for customers or employees(7)? If in
fact they are for customers, where are the employees to park? We already haveca
parking space problem in this area, i.e. Police Officers parking their private
vehicles while they are at work, Windy's Flowers employees, especially prior to
holidays when they bring in more employees to handle the larger volume in flower
sales.
Another area for concern is the noise factor. According to the drawings the
blowers to blow the water off the vehicles will be located at the Northeast corner
of the lot. Directly across the alley from the blowers (approximately 30 feet)
are residential units, and approximately 50-75 feet further North is the Chula
Vista Inn, a retirement home. A car wash with all the noise associated with it,
blowers, vacumns and automobiles, seems quite inappropriate in such an area.
A 24 foot tall lighted sign is also an inappropriate visual eyesore. If someone
wants to find a car wash, they don't drive around the City looking for a tall
sign to tell them where it's at. People usually get directions, such as, "it's
at the corner of Fourth and E Streets", or they look in the Yellow Pages to get
the address, and once there I don't believe they need a 24 foot sign to disting-
uish a car wash from an A.M. P.M., a Bank or a florist.
Another concern is the amount of automobile traffic generated by this car wash as
stated in the project discription. It states it should generate 200 automobiles
per day. This figure seems unbe1ieveably low. I'm no rocket scientist but
kicking a few figures around in my head, it seems to me the figure would have to
b alot higher to make this a profitable venture. Additional traffic congestion
is simply not needed at Fourth and E Streets. We already have high volume traffic
at the A.M. P.M. on one corner, a drive-in florist on another corner and a Bank. I
firmly believe that high volume, in and out type businesses, such as the A.M. P.M.
and the proposed Full Service Car Wash should not be located on any major inter-
section. With the heavy traffic volume that already flows through these inter-
sections why add to this congestion by adding these types of businesses.
Looking down the road w.th the development of the Bay Front Project, traffic will
only increase on E Street in the years ahead. The traffic on Fourth Avenue has
already increased quite a bit with the closure of Fifth Avenue at the Broadway
Shopping Center and the completion of Highway 54.
A Full Service Car Wash at this location, in my view, is inappropriate!
~M~O t~_
50
Lf,;J() , ;2
,5) CD A ~ UP4 - GO 1\.VJ LA.) ~ ac c..w-:J \?v l~ k -:> ~ p, "1-
C9 0 r~ - ~ U-A- rt-dLLq 'LA ~ (~) el~L~
I
4 CJ--L<!...k0'Y\.....Q..Jc. ') ,
(j) l0o~ /L~lLkj) ~ wW w~ (~~1lv- !
(3 \J\S~~ \\~ [.j/ ).'f' ~lt \1\.~~
~~ f-x.vL
'-{-2-D'IIQ3
" LA ~ kh W IlULtcrG(
e)~~
q "Lt..>4.Xu.~
5-JS;/
ADDENDUM "A"
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
4th & "E" Car Wash
IS-92-40
In compliance with AB 3180, this Mitigation Monitoring Program
(MMP) has been prepared to address the monitoring of implementation
of those mitigation measures set forth in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration pertaining to IS-92-40, the 4th and "E" Car Wash
project.
AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or
significant environmental impacts. The MMP for the 4th and "E" Car
Wash project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the
following potentially significant impacts:
. Water Use Impacts
Noise Impacts
. Light and Glare Impacts
. Public Services Impacts
. Visual Impacts
The Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC) shall be the City of
Chula Vista Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC). The applicant
shall be responsible for ensuring to the satisfaction of the ERC
that all conditions of the MMP have been met.
Water Use Mitiqation
The proposed project is associated with potentially significant
water use impacts. Mitigation of potentially significant water
impacts shall be ensured through implementation of the following
measures:
1. The applicant must participate in whatever water conservation
or fee offset program the City of Chula vista has in effect at
the time of building permit issuance. This includes
installing a water reclamation and recycling system to the
satisfaction of the Building Department.
2. The applicant shall comply with any requirements to pay fees
or make improvements to water supply facilities as required by
the Sweetwater Authority.
Noise Impact Mitiqation
The proposed project is associated with potentially significant
noise impacts. Mitigation of potentially significant noise impacts
shall be ensured by the construction of a 7.5 foot noise
attenuation wall along the eastern property line immediately north
of the car wash's exit tunnel and along the northern property line
from the northeast corner to the west side of the trash bin area.
5-S=<.
ADDENDUM A
IS-92-40 - 4th & "E" Car Wash
Page 2
Liaht and Glare Impacts
The proposed project is associated with potentially significant
light and glare impacts. Mitigation of potentially significant
light and glare impacts shall be ensured through the design and
type of outdoor lighting. outdoor lighting shall be of a design
and type which will not significantly impact neighboring uses to
the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator.
Public Services Impacts
The proposed project is associated with potentially significant
impacts to public services. Mitigation of potentially significant
impacts to public services shall be ensured through implementation
of the following measures:
1. The applicant shall show proof of payment of school fees to
the Environmental Review Coordinator prior to the issuance of
Building Permits.
2. A letter shall be submitted by the applicant to the Sweetwater
Authority from the Chula vista Fire Department stating fire
flow requirements prior to the approval of the conditional use
permit.
visual Impacts
The proposed project is associated with potentially significant
visual impacts. Mi tigation of potentially significant visual
impacts shall be ensured through implementation of the following
measures:
1. The project shall comply with all requirements of the Design
Review Committee pertaining to issues related to setbacks,
landscaping, building type, lot coverage and any other issues
addressed in the Design Review process.
2. Such measures shall be consistent with the City of Chula Vista
General Plan and the Central Chula vista Area Plan.
~ . 53
~
NOISE TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR THE
4TH A VENUE AND E STREET CAR WASH
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 FOURTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
Prepared by
RECCJfJN
Regional Environmental Consu~ants
7460 ~ Vale)' Ao.!, $lin Diego, CA 82108 (lUI) 542-1611
RECON NUMBER 2442N
JUNE 26,1992
5.510{
ADDENDUM "B"
~
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
I. INTRODUCTION
ll. ANALYSIS METIIODOLOGY
I
1
4
A. APPLICABLE STANDARDS AND DEFINITIONS OF TERMS 4
B. NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 7
C. OPERATION NOISE ANALYSIS 8
m. EXISTING CONDmONS
A. ON-SITE
B. AT AN EXISTING CAR WASH
IV. IMPACTS AND MITIGATION
V. PERSONS AND AGENCIES CONSULTED
VI. REFERENCES CITED
9
9
9
10
13
I3
FIGURES
I: Regionallocation
2: Project location within the city of Chula Vista
3: Project site plan
4: Cross-sections
2
3
5
11
TABLE
1: Property Line Noise Limits
6
~ --5.5
~
,
i
Summary of Findings
The proposed project is the construction of a car wash on the northeast comer of 4th
A venue and E Street in the city of Chula Vista. The site is cUlTently used as a parking
lot. One building is proposed to be constructed along the eastern boundary of the project
site, which would house a customer area, office space, and the car wash tunnel. The
wash tunnel would be oriented south to north and the two ends would be open. Access to
the site would be from 4th Avenue.
The site is anticipated to operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. seven days per week
(Shields, ShieldslMacek Incorporated, 6/19/92). Two hundred customers per day are
expected.
The main concern at the project site is the impact to nearby multi-family residences due
to noise from the blowers which dry the cars as they exit the wash tunnel. The proposed
blowers are trade-named The Stripper, and are manufactured by Proto-Vest, Inc., of
Michigan. Based on noise measurements taken at a similar car wash and the
effectiveness of the noise reduction devices proposed to be installed on the project's
blowers, noise levels generated by The Stripper would be 74.3 a-weighted decibels
(dBA) average hourly sound level (Leq) at 20 feet directly in front of the wash tunnel.
The City's Noise Abatement and Control Ordinance (1989a) specifies limits for
stationary source noise which depend on the sUlTounding land uses. Based on the
existing sUlTounding land uses, limits at the receiving land use boundaries would be
60 dBA Leq during the day (7:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. on weekends). The ordinance also specifies an interior noise level limit of
45 dBA Leq for multi-family residences (City of Chula Vista 1989a).
A six-foot wall is currently proposed around the east and north boundaries of the site
from the car wash tunnel to the trash bin. However, to meet the City's exterior noise
level limit of 60 dBA Leq at the closest residential receptors, a 7.5-foot wall is needed in
place of the proposed 6-foot wall. Based on a typical wood frame with stucco wall
construction, with aluminum-framed windows, the City's interior noise level limits would
not be exceeded on any of the floors of the multi-family buildings.
I. Introduction
The proposed project is the construction of a car wash on the northeast comer of 4th
Avenue and E Street in the city of Chula Vista. Figure I shows the location of the
project site within the county of San Diego, and Figure 2 shows the project site within the
city of Chula Vista.
1
s' oS '"
- = ~
~ 0 fa
.-
.... It
~
!:! ~ (,J
0
~ c:J ~
~ -
'Yn:Hld~1 ~ ~
=
_u 0
r::>
... .-
en
. QJ
"
E ~
,
u
.
~
0 ?:I
2'
.~
III
>-
...
~
o
u
w
o
OJ
a:
w
>-
ii
t
I;.
<II
0
'"
-
Z
0
1=
<:
u
. 0
c
:e ..J
c
E-
U
t.I.1
a
c:.::
Q.
.
)
.
,
.
.8
J5
i
~
.
~
;;
u
c
w
.
. w g
:g.; =
""'-u-r::
..- .0
.. ": Q.
II
"
" "
"
o c
"
::::
i:
ij
i:\
*~~
::::::
,.:,
'"
11j1
Ii ~
11, '.~
,'. ::J:
::c;::':':::':~':::::::lli::::~~;;:;~~~;m;!;~~;!;~;!;!~;!;!;!:!:!:!:!:!:!:!;!:t~ \ .. :> ~
5-.5 7
~\
B l.
u
..
"
z
c
a:
o
c
,
~
V
t-
~
~,\,,,,v;y...~~? .... ,~~~. .:,' .::.~.
.
.<.:.
----,
.,..,- /'-.
...;~;':"
,;1,'%.'<.::
..~\.;~:)~ ....
~~ !... '-'::>---
\l"-' ,
\
''';
\-
\':""
\(j
\0
"
~
.0
.~
-z.
'~
\
-,'(
-. .; . 1
-;:: ,?--::....::;;:;':_ - ><t
..r;~;""", - :--
T€C0-~-~--
~ - -f "..::b'_~___ .
-""-- -- ~----
( --_/
... ;..
'-..-...;'13 \
~ ..:~..-..:-."---- \
.:\ '
,
..
,-
\ ,
\ \,
\ \~
~ ,\:\
c:, " \ \0(.
i ~1
~ ~,.,., 1'"
I:: Map Source: San Diego County ~s~'Regio~~
;::::: Base Map, South Metro Quadrangle
1(':1
~~~j~~
.......:
:.;.:.:
'C:
"
" :--....
~ <$'"
-.~
4000
2000 FEET
FIGURE 2
:::~:~:;:~:~:~:;;~:;:~:;~:mE:~m;:m:t:
Project Location within the City of Chula Vista
RECaJN
.
.s-Sg
R-2442N 7/92
~
Figure 3 shows the proposed site plan. The site is currently used as a parking lot. The
proposed building would be constructed along the eastern boundary of the project site
and would house a customer area, office space, and the car wash tunnel. The wash tunnel
would be oriented south to north and the two ends would be open. Access to the site
would be from 4th Avenue.
A six-foot wall is proposed in the northeast comer of the site and a three- to six-foot wall
is proposed along most of the southern boundary (see Figure 3). Three- and four-foot-
high landscaped mounds are proposed along the western boundary.
The site is anticipated to operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. seven days per week
(Shields, Shields/MacekIncorporated, 6/19/92). Two hundred customers per day are
expected.
This acoustical study addresses the potential noise impacts to surrounding sensitive
receptors which could occur due to operation of the blowers located within the wash
tunnel. hnpacts are assessed in accordance with City of Chula Vista standards
established for stationary sources in the Noise Abatement and Control Ordinance
(Municipal Code, Title 19, Section 68).
II. Analysis Methodology
A. Applicable Standards and Definitions of Terms
The City's Noise Abatement and Control Ordinance (Municipal Code, Title 19, Section
19.68) specifies limits for stationary source noise which depend on the surrounding land
uses and zoning. These limits do not apply to vehicles traveling on public rights-of-way
(Section 19.68.060.c.5).
The ordinance states that any noise, except construction noise, produced at the boundary
of a property receiving noise shall not exceed the limits shown in Table 1. Limits are
established as hourly average noise levels in A-weighted decibels. The Leq is the
constant noise level equivalent to an actual time-varying sound occurring over a specified
time period.
As shown in Table I, the stationary source noise limits vary by land use and by time of
day. Daytime hourly noise level limits during the week (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and the
weekend (8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) are 60 dBA Leq for a multi-family residential zone
and 65 dBA Leq for a commercial zone. If the land use of an area producing a noise is
different than the land use of an adjacent area receiving the noise, the limit at the
4
5-51
.
A' B'
Mulli-fm1ily ResideDccs
,I ...........
, .
.. .,
, V ''''.0
.- :~ . ,~..' .-
, -
, !
!' .
I oS
-t I ~' ..
\i J. "
;~, I ~
, ,/
,
i ".
~ " ,'..'
. . ".
.. ~ ~
,
h .
.
.~ ,~
.
! ,\
, ;..
. d
, ".51
J
t ~,~ i
.
f , IQ
~ r !, .01
~ , ~'I
~ , J "'~IW-......_.,..-......... -~
~ nl~~"
l II&~-",.- " ,~u
~ \I'll' ""1\111' "iI
~---;-,
"-
( ~"- -. ,~~
.
- '.
,
'.
"
,.
,.;::::
u.
[;1
~~'.'.
~:::::
........
..",,'w.'ww:
.............. ............."."."...*,.M
.;.:.:.:.~:.:.:-:-:..-:-:.}.
R-2442N 7/92
----~...-c;;:;-_.Uj".....--- -
_n:.~ ,"-I""'"
.. .
~ ""
64
32 FEET
)
"
..
FIGURE 3
Proposed Site Plan
RECf1JN
5-(,.0
..
TABLE 1
PROPERTY LINE NOISE LIMITS
Receiving Land Use
Noise Level Limit
dB~ Leq (! hour)
Daytime Nighttime2
Single-family residential
Multi-family residential
55
60
65
70
80
45
50
60
70
80
Commercial
Light industry
Heavy industry
SOURCE: Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 19.68 - Perfonnance Standards
and Noise Control. Section 19.68.030:Table m.
IDaytime = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on weekdays and 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on
weekends.
2Nighttime = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. on weekdays and 10:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. on
weekends.
5-41
.
boundary of the receiving land use is the more restrictive limit of the two land uses (City
of Chula Vista 1989a:Table ill). Also, if the ambient noise level in an area is higher than
the limit stated in the ordinance, the ambient noise level becomes the limit (Section
19.68.030.bA).
The project would be a commercial use. Adjacent to the property on the north are multi-
family residential uses. To the east and south are commercial uses. On the northwest
corner of 4th Avenue and E Street is a gas station, and north of the gas station is a multi-
family residential building. Therefore, the project's daytime noise level limit at the multi-
family areas to the north and northwest would be 60 dBA Leq. At the other boundaries,
the daytime noise level limit would be 65 dBA Leq. Since the proposed car wash would
operate from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., only the daytime noise level limits apply to the
project. The City's noise ordinance also establishes an interior noise level limit for multi-
family residences of 45 Community Noise Equivalent Levels (CNEL) during the daytime
hours (Section 19.68.040).
The City of Chula Vista Noise Element (l989b) does not establish quantitative criteria
for traffic noise. However, Section 19.68.010 of the Municipal Code (l989:Table ll)
does cite the list of National Goals for Noise Reduction (Environmental Protection
Agency [EP A] 1977). This list states that noise exposure levels should be reduced to at
least 65 day/night average noise level (Ldn). The City has indicated that CNEL should be
used (Reid, City of Chula Vista, 6/17/92). Therefore, a transportation noise level limit of
65 CNEL was used as the standard for residential areas.
The CNEL is a 24-hour cumulative measure of community noise exposure based on the
A-weighted decibel. A-weighting is a frequency correction that correlates noise levels
with the frequency response of the human hearing system. The CNEL adds 5 dBA to the
average evening noise levels (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 10 dBA to the average
nighttime noise levels (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m) to account for the added sensitivity to
noise during these time periods. The Ldn is very similar to the CNEL, except that only
the nighttime hours are weighted.
B. Noise Level Measurements
Measurements were taken using a Metrosonics dB-308 Sound Level Dosimeter/Analyzer,
serial number 1359, which was calibrated prior to the survey. The following parameters
were used:
Filter:
Response:
Measurement Interval:
A-weighted
Slow (1/8 second)
30 seconds
7
s-<;,~
.
Ambient noise Ievels in the project area are dominated by traffic on 4th Avenue and E
Street. The existing nonpeak ambient noise levels were detennined through on-site
measurements.
Measurements were also taken at a similar car wash in the city of Chula Vista. However,
the measured car wash blowers, trade-named The Stripper, did not incorporate the noise
reduction devices proposed for the project.
c. Operation Noise Analysis
RECON conducted noise measurements at a similar car wash, the All-American Car
Wash, on Broadway in the city of Chula Vista. This car wash uses the same machinery
as the proposed project. However, the measured blowers did not have noise reduction
devices installed.
Noise levels generated by the proposed car wash blowers (The Stripper) were calculated
based on the noise measurements taken at the similar car wash and infonnation regarding
noise reduction devices supplied by the manufacturer of The Stripper, Proto-Vest, Inc.
Noise levels at the nearby multi-family residences due to the car wash blowers were
calculated using the above infonnation while taking into account noise attenuation
provided by distance and by barriers proposed to be constructed along the northern
property boundary. Distance attenuation for a point source is equal to 6 dBA for every
doubling of distance from the reference distance.
The insertion loss of a barrier when the noise source is a point source is calculated from a
set of equations based on the Fresnel number (FHWA 1979:Appendix B). The insertion
loss of a barrier is dependent upon the barrier's relative height compared to the source
and the receptor. Generally, an effective barrier breaks the line of sight between a source
and a receptor. IT the barrier does not break the line of sight there could still be some
insertion loss but it would be 5 dBA or less.
The tunnel exit would be 16 feet wide and 10 feet tall. The noise source (The Stripper)
was assumed to be located six feet above the ground. Based on observations, most of the
noise from the blowers is located near a car's height.
Typically, sensitive receptors are place five feet above the ground, an average ear height
(FHW A 1979). However, the multi-family residence to the north is slightly elevated,
about 1.5 feet, above the alley. Therefore, fust-floor receptors at this building were
assumed to be at a height of 6.5 feet and second-floor receptors were assumed to be at
16.5feet.
8
s-~3
It
lIT. Existing Conditions
A. On-Site
Measurements were taken on the nonheast comer of the project site on June 22, 1992. at
25 feet from the multi-family residences to the nonh. There was a clear line of sight to
4th Avenue 103 feet away, and also to E Street 110 feet away. Between 9:15 a.m. and
9:45 a.m., the average noise level at this location was measured to be 60 dBA Leq. The
noise sources in the area were traffic on 4th Avenue and E Street. This average noise
level represents a typical nonpeak daytime ambient level in the project area. During the
half-hour measurement period, traffic volumes on E Street were 472 cars, 2 buses, 6
medium trucks, and 4 heavy trucks. Traffic volumes on 4th Avenue were 384 cars, 4
buses, 6 medium trucks, and 2 heavy trucks.
Recent 24-hour traffic counts taken by the City Traffic Engineering Department show
that 4th Avenue carries an average daily traffic volume (ADT) of about 16,800 ADT
(count taken February 1992) and E Street carries about 18,150 ADT (count taken
ApriVMay 1991) (Traffic Engineering, City ofChula Vista, 6/22/92).
B. At An Existing Car Wash
Measurements were taken on June 22, 1992, between 8:30 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. at the All
American Car Wash located on Broadway near Oxford Street in the city of Chula Vista.
This car wash has the same components as the proposed car wash, except that noise
reduction devices are not installed. There was very little traffic on Broadway. Noise
from this traffic and from the sUITounding auto-related businesses was not high enough to
influence the noise level measurements taken of the car wash operations.
The area of concern for the proposed project is the noise generated by The Stripper which
would escape from the end of the tunnel. The Stripper dries the cars as they exit the
tunnel. At 48 feet directly in front of the exit to the All American Car Wash tunnel, the
noise levels were measured to be 73.8 dBA Leq while The Stripper was operating. At 17
feet directly in front of the tunnel, the noise levels were measured to be 80.7 dBA Leq
while The Stripper was operating and 70.2 dBA Leq when it was turned off and noise was
only being generated by the washing mechanisms inside the tunnel. During the 10-
minute measurement period at 17 feet from the tunnel, two cars went through the tunnel
and the average noise level for the on/off cycles was 78.7 dBA Leq.
9
$,6,/
..
Noise levels were also measured diagonally away from the tunnel at 11 feet from the
front of the tunnel and 17 feet from the side. At this location, noise levels were
72.3 dBA Leq during operation of The Stripper, which is about 8 dBA less than
measurements taken directly in front of the tunnel at 17 feet.
IV. Impacts and Mitigation
As part of the proposed project, a noise reduction kit would be installed on the car wash
blowers. This kit would be supplied by The Stripper's manufacturer, Proto-Vest, Inc.,
and would reduce noise levels generated by The Stripper by 5 dBA. This reduction value
is based on results of tests conducted by Proto-Vest, Inc., which was sent to the applicant.
This reduction value was also confInned through consultation with the manufacturer
(Proto-Vest, Inc., Customer Service Department, 6/23/92). Therefore, at 17 feet directly
in front of the tunnel, The Stripper's noise levels would be reduced from 80.7 dBA Leq to
75.7 dBA Leq. If the car wash operated 10 hours per day as proposed, the CNEL
produced by the blowers would be 71.7 CNEL. At an equivalent distance to the side of
the tunnel, the noise levels would be reduced from 72.3 dBA Leq to 67.2 dBA Leq.
Sensitive receptors within the vicinity of the project include the multi-family residential
building directly across the alley from the northern boundary of the project site, the
Chula Vista Inn, and a retirement facility which is the next building north about 140 feet
from the northern boundary of the project. The multi-family building is mostly one-story
tall. There is one unit facing the tunnel with a second story. This unit is in the back,
above the garages.
The back half of the Chula Vista Inn has a clear line of site to the project through the
parking lot of the multi-family residence located between the project and the inn. The
front half of the inn would be shielded from car wash noise by the multi-family building.
The Chula Vista Terraces, a multi-family residential building across 4th Avenue and just
north of the project site, would also be a sensitive receptor. However, since it is farther
away than the other multi-family buildings and off to the side of the car wash tunnel, it
would experience much lower noise levels from the car wash tunnel than would the other
two buildings. Therefore, if the noise level standards are met at the multi-family building
directly to the north, they would also be met at Chula Vista Terraces.
Through cross-sections, Figure 4 shows the relationship between the proposed car wash
tunnel and both the multi-family residential building and the Chula Vista Inn. The
locations of sensitive receptors used to detennine impacts are also shown.
,5- ~ oS
10
,.
x
Project Site
/Recommended
-r- .... Addition
IT"
7 s,T Proposed
r l' Barrier
I
20'
Alley
Multi-family
Building
16.S'
;~.
~S'-I
A'
Wkh
I
10'
TUre!
; Source
eT
6'
1
A
I 29'
Cross Section A - Nearest Residential Receptors
/RealmmCndCd
;Source Addition
Wasb TIO'.~ . .-in_Proposed Barrier
TUDDcl '.V 6' 7.S 0'11'
, B I-- 2::P' 20'-1 117'
AIlcy Parking LoI Behind Multi-family Building
, -ProjcClSile
x
CbuJ Vista
X~Inn
~5'T2S'
X"5'T
I B'
.::
~;
IN}
.::
f;
?'i
I~
$ * See Figure 3 for Location of Cross Sections
~.:.:
Cross Section B - Receptors at Chula Vista Inn
~'.'.'
~.:.:.
X Receplor Locations
FIGURE 4
Cross Sections
[fJ", ...'..'.wr._!j!~'
(.... .........,...,.".,."....".... ,
::::::;:;:::;::::::::~::::::::::~:::::::::'-:::::::::;:: :-:
R-2442N 7/92
RECrDN
s.,,~
.
According to the City's noise ordinance, the daytime noise level limit at the boundary
between the site and the multi-family residential areas would be 60 dBA Leq (see
Table 1). The off-peak ambient noise levels were not higher than 60 dBA Leq' therefore
the values in Table I apply.
The tunnel exit as shown in Figure 3 is proposed to be 29 feet from the northern
boundary of the site. A six-foot wall is proposed along the eastern and northern
boundaries from the tunnel to the trash bin (see Figure 3). Without the proposed barrier,
noise levels at the project boundary directly in front of the tunnel would be
71.0 dBA Leq' or 67.0 CNEL. At the first floor of the nearest multi-family residence, 54
feet away and 1.5 feet above the project elevation, the noise levels would be 65.7 dBA
Leq.
With the proposed six-foot barrier, noise levels in the alley within six feet of the wall
would be 63 dBA Leq and noise levels at the first floor of the multi-family building
would be 61 dBA Leq. These noise levels would not meet the City's 60 dBA Leq criteria
for stationary source noise. A higher barrier would be needed.
A 7.5-foot barrier constructed in the same location as the 6-foot barrier would attenuate
noise levels at the nearest sensitive receptors to below City standards. In the alley at six
feet from the barrier noise levels from The Stripper would be 59 dBA Leq. At the first
floor of the nearest multi-family residence, exterior noise levels would be 60 dBA Leq-
At the first floor of the Chula Vista Inn, exterior noise levels would be 50 dBA Leq.
These levels are from The Stripper only. Noise in the area would still be generated by
traffic on 4th Avenue and E Street, although the car wash would provide some shielding
of traffic noise from these roadways.
In general, noise barriers are not as effective for upper floors of buildings because the
break in the line of sight is not as great as for first-floor receptors. The multi-family
building directly to the north of the project has a second floor level in the back where the
garages are located, 25 feet from the project boundary and directly across from the wash
tunnel. The Chula Vista Inn also has a second and third floor. These buildings have
aluminum-framed windows facing the project site. At the one unit with a second floor in
the multi-family building, noise levels would be 65 dBA Leq. The upper levels of the
Chula Vista Inn would be exposed to exterior noise levels of 51 dBA Leq on the second
floor and 52 dBA Leq on the third floor. There are no outdoor areas such as balconies on
these upper levels, however, there is still an interior noise level limit of 45 dBA Leq
which must be met (City of Chula Vista 1989a:Section 19.68.040). '
Typically, wood-framed stucco walls with aluminum-framed windows can attenuate at
least 22 dBA (State of California 1975) when the windows are closed. Therefore, the
exterior noise level of 65 dBA Leq at the second-story unit in the multi-family building
directly to the north would be attenuated to an interior level of about 43 dBA Leq' which
12
5-'-'1
..
is below the City standard. It should be noted that although noise levels would not
exceed City standards inside the second-floor unit, this unit would be exposed to noise
levels about 5 dBA higher than the measured existing off-peak ambient level of 60 dBA
Leq.
Interior noise levels at the second and third floor of the Chula Vista Inn would be about
29-30 dBA Leq with the windows closed, well below the 45 dBA Leq limil
In summary, a 7.5-foot wall constructed around the east and north boundaries of the site
from the car wash tunnel to the trash bin would provide enough noise reduction to meet
the City's exterior noise level limit of 60 dBA Leq at the property boundary and at the
closest residential receptors. Based on a typical stucco wall with aluminum-framed
windows, interior noise level limits would not be exceeded on any of the floors of the
multi-family buildings.
V. Persons and Agencies Consulted
ShieldslMac~k Incorporated
William Shields, Principal
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
Doug Reid, Environmental Review Coordinator
Traffic Engineering
Proto-Vest, Inc.
Customer Service Department
VI. References Cited
Chula Vista, City of
1989a Municipal Code. Title 19. Chapter 19.68 - Perfonnance Standards and Noise
Control. November.
1989b General Plan. Chapter 9 - Noise. July 11.
California, State of
1975 Evaluation of Outdoor to Indoor Noise Reduction of Building Facades and
Outdoor Noise Barriers. Prepared by R. DuPree, State Office of Noise Control.
July.
13
s ~'" b'
.
Environmental Protection Agency
1977 Toward a National Strategy for Noise Control. April.
Federal Highway Administration
1979 FHW A Highway Administration Noise Prediction Model, Report No. FHW A-
RD-77-108. Federal Highway Administration, Washington. D.C.
14
5 web r
,
---
,(
(
,
~AAOOUS ~TlRIALS MANAG04E~r O'''SIOH
IH)EAGROufI) TAl<< REMOY ALlCl.OSUIE III PLACE !lEPCRT
EST. , H...1.2.1ro.-
P.C.,~
SITE NNIE eJ{~I/RDtJ l>7A ' lNC-..
.
AOa!ESS 1q1 ~ 41"'t'..Jtl1LA VL~-rA I lA
CON1RACT~ Cfl..P'>f;rl -+- OV~O,.J
, of Tanks (ov/l. ('+)
A..oval ~ Clos..,.a In Plac. 0
~, Tank I
I. Tank ~f',
PHONE ('l.i-;)~"I~ .:J:w
ZIP 'q'Z..c> to
PHONE
Tank 4
Tank ,
2. UIL I
,. Capacity (Gallons)
4. Material Stored
5. OIcontaalnatlon:
Manifest Avallabl.?
6. Tank 'n....,.lng: (CGIRDS)
Or'y 'cel"'- . (Qfy)
7. Tank Condition (HoI.s'
8. CondItIon Of Back 'III/Typ.
9. Condition of Natlv. Soli/Type
10. OIors F~... Excavation?
II. Ponded Product1
12. Ground Watar Contell nat I on
13. Plpelln. Leak [wld...t?
14. Relnspectlon RequIred? t-.JC
15 R.lnl action R...I t Avallabl.? N
ND
t.JO
~ YES FIRE AGENCY 0 I()
FIRE AGEICY PERMIT I
JlJHSOICTIOH e.v
PHONE ~q I - "'5"D5...,
1 . S,6,-M ~tt Rc;;c,K.
REMARKS:
\AI~ ~SWrJ QF-
~~ ~~ SIE.4.H~
~"-IO~ W~
r-JANiS ~..
~DO~ -rA&? oN -r;w KS
c...(~ 1'l,D"
~~~
, W.. DIL. 'T1\-J...J \L. \It 4
~(~ c...ur-
tE- ~ ~ 't?U"K
t-]o ~ ~NI"'(:"..
\M~~c.lJ IN" 0 I L
:;}A-N}L. ~ATIDJ
c;.o I u1::...
NOTICE: You are hereby notified that on ~. F=~ ~ . HAznrdoua
Kateriala Speciall.t conducted an inspection for the removal of ~ hazardou. .ub.tance
~n~e:,:cun~ =:or:;e t~.. A .u=:ary cf the conditicns found i. noted as follovs:
~ The .1te determination la pendina recelpt of Laboratory Analyl~' Reault. for lampl..
W taken thb d.te. Rave the Labor.tory aend the ruulta dlr.ctly to ~O""-I M:E'; Aif\
of the HHKD C.ea addra.. balow).
O Contamination of tha excavation area baa been confirmed by ob..rvatlon. mada durlna
the tank removal thia d.t.. leain Site Aa......nt pha.. C.ee rever~e).
Laboratw ~lta receiv.d and reviewed by of the J!MKI)
Cln q I~ /1f'71 ' u do 5"~
~o furth.r action 18 requlred. '!.;.!:!3 .. Me;. eu
o Beain Sit. As...nent pha.. C.ee attached) I.; ~
Haz r-dous
Co ty of San
D. ar-tment of ..lth S.r-vic..
H~~D - P.O. Box 8~261
San Diego. CA 92138-5261
(619)236-2222
Received
Pr-int Name -(0'-''''- ~"-Y
Phone Number- ~7";'-.;l'3bj
(Sign)
CHI'II1D Copy)
5 - 7l)
ADDENDUM "C"
Chevron
~
~
:;.,,,,,,
Chevron U.S,A. Inc.
1300 South Beach Boulevard, Building 4516. La Habra. California. PhDne 12131 694.7300
Mall Address: PO Sax 2833. La HaDfa. CA 90631-2833
~t;Jrke!l!1g Departmem
October 4, 19&9
Serv ice S ta tion No. 9-0 I 04
4th and E
Chula Vista, California
Mr. Burton Crosby Leach
P. O. Box 3385
San Diego, CA 92103
Dear Mr. Leach:
In response to your September 26, 1989 letter, I am enclosing a soil sampling report
and a soil compaction report. These reports certify that there was no gasoline in the
soil at this site when the tanks were removed. I hope this clears up any further
questions that you may have.
Also,1 have enclosed another letter from Mr. Segawa, concerning your property.
Very truly yours,
JAH/lgg/I-IIJ
Enclosures
~r
/
5-?1
GEOBASE
SOIUROCK MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
Mr. Glenn F. Barton
March 28, 1989
400 Galleon Way
SeaL Beach, Californla 90740
Project No: C.131.29.00
Dear Mr. Barton
SUBJECT: COMPACTION REPORT ON BACKFILL OF TANK EXCAVATIONS
Located at the NEC of E. Street and 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, California
This report summarizes observations and compaction testing performed
during the backfilling of a tank excavation. The Site Plan is given as
Figure 1, attached.
FIELD TESTING
Field density tests were compared to laboratory tests of the same soil
type. f1aximum dry densitv/optimum moisture content relationships for
the backfill soils used are presented on Table I, attached, Laboratory
Test Results. The laboratory standard of compaction used was ASTH
01557-78.
Fill soils were probed between tests. Approximate locations of in-place
density tests are shown on the Site plan, Figure 1, attached. These
in-place density tests were performed in accordance with ASTM 01556-82
(Sand Cone Method). Fill soils were a minimum of 90 percent of the
laboratory standard at the locations tested. The test results are given
on Table II, Results of compaction Tests, attached.
OBJECTIVES
The purpose of the geotechnLcaL ser~ice~ was to monitor backfill
placement and compaction.
I\PR 131959 LAM.
GEOBASE. INC, . (714) 770-1643 . 25422 Trabuco Rd.. No. 105-468 . EI Taro. CA 92630-2740
s-?::&>..
r
i'
i
C.l3!. 29 .00
Page 2 of 3
EXCAVATIONS
Removal of the storage tank resulted in an excavation approximately
thirty-three (33) feet wide, forty-two (42) feet long, and ten (10) feet
deep.
SOIL TYPES
The backfill soils consisted of black imported silty sands to an
approximate depth of four and one-half (4t) feet below finished grade.
From approximately four and one-half (4t) to ten (10) feet below
finished grade, the backfill soils consisted of well graded gray silty
sand.
FILL PLACEMENT
Fill soils were placed in an average of 8-inch lifts, brought to near
optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the
maximum density as determined by ASTM 01557-78, Five-Layer Method. The
soils were placed and compacted by track-rolling with a John Deere
dozer.
Grading operations were started and completed on March 16, 1989.
SUMMARY
The tank backfill operations, as well as observations and testing
services described hereinr have been limited to those grading operations
performed on March 16, 1989.
The conclusions and recommendations
contained herein have been based upon our observations and testing as
noted.
Based on our observations and testing, it is our opinion that the
grading operations were performed in general accordance with our
recommendations as well as the requirements of the regulating agencies.
GEOBASE
5 r ?..3
C.131.29.00
Page 3 of 3
Services performed by GEOBASE, INC. for this report were conducted in a
manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised
by members of the profession currently practicing under similar
conditions. No other warranty expressed or implied is made.
This letter report is subject to review by the appropriate regulating
agencies.
Respectfully submitted
GEOBASE, INC.
J-M (John) Chevallier, P.E., G.E.
R.C.E. 3919B; G.E. 2056
Principal
pb
Distribution: (4) addressee
Attachments: Table I, Table II and Site Plan (Figure 1)
GEOBASE
,$- ?~
R.156.01.00
TABLE I
MAXIHIDI DRY DENSITY/OPTIHIDI MOISTURE CONTENT
ASTH 01557-78
SOIL
TYPE
NUMBER
SOIL
TYPE
SOIL
DESCRIPTION
DRY
DENSITY (PCF)
OPTIMUM
MOISTURE
CONTENT (%)
1
2
SM
SM
SAND, gray
SAND, black, silty (Import)
121
121. 5
10
12
GEOBASE
S-?..5
C.131.01.00
TABLE II
RESULTS OF FIELD DENSITY TESTING
ASTM 01556-82
APPROX." DRY RELATIVE SOIL
TEST DEPTH MOISTURE DENSITY COMPACTION SOIL TYPE
NO. DATE (FT. ) CONTENT (%) (PCF) (%) TYPE NUMBER
1 03/16 '3 12 125 '37 SM 1
2 03/16 7.5 11 126 '37 SM 1
3 03/16 6 11 121 93 SM 1
4 03/16 4.5 11 119 92 SM 1
5 03/16 4 11 112 92 SM 2
6 03/16 3.5 12 113 92 SM 2
7 03/16 3 10 110 '31 SM 2
8 03/16 2.5 10 116 '36 SM 2
'3 03/16 1.5 11 114 94 SM 2
10 03/16 0.5" 11 106 87 SM 2
lOA 03/16 0.5 11 118 97 SM 2
" Below Adjacent Pavement surface.
GEOBASE
:. r ?G:.
1
I
N
SCALE: 1 inch = 30 feet
CI)Approxtmate Density Test Locations.
X-X-X-X-x-x-x-><-;.c;-X-X-x-x
I . I
l' I
X X
I I
X X
I I
XXI Approximat.e Limits of XI
Tank Excavation
I X
X
I
X
I
X
I
X
I
X
\
?-
"'...
~x-X-X-X-X-X-X-~-x_x_
Existing
Building
'.JaIl
~
:>
<
-=
~
E STREET
GEOBASE
SITE PLAN
NEe of E STREET and 10TH AVENUE
CHUl.A VISTA, CALIFORN1A
e.131.29.QO
Figure 1
5-?1
rl'l~ GROUNDWATER
, '1'-'-'1
u __J J: TECHNOLOGY, INC.
April 21, 1989
III!)(J 1~(I~dl..: Str~...:I. SUlI!,; C. S~\l1 J)it:~II. C.\ ~1~I:!1
((;1!\J.t5:!-~4Ll
Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
P.o. Box 2833
La Habra, CA 90632
ATTN:
HR. JODY HADLEY
SITE:
CHEVRON SERVICE STATION #104
391 "E" STREET
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
RE:
TANK REMOVAL AlID SOIL SAl1PLING REPORT
Dear Mr. ::adley:
As reques~ed by Chevron U.S.A., Inc., on March 14, 1989,
Ground~a~er Technology, Inc. (GTI), observed the re~oval of three
underground gasoline fuel tanks and one underground waste oil tank,
cb~ained soil samples from the fuel tank and waste oil tank
excavations, and obtained a soil sample in the vicinity of gasoline
product lines at the former Chev"ron service station located in
Chula Vis~a, California (see Fig. 1).
On March 14, 1989, GTI observed the removal of one 5,OOO-gallon
Supreme gasoline fuel tank (#3), one 10,000-gallon Unleaded
gasoline fuel tank (#1), one 10,000-gallon Regular gasoline fuel
tank (#2), and one l,OOO-gallon waste oil tank (#4, see Fig. 2 for
t.ank locations).
People attending the tank removal event included 11r. Sam Schreck,
fire inspec~or for the City of Chula Vis~a, Mr. Frederick Allee a~d
Mr. John Menatti, San Diego County H!1MD, Mrs. Laura Box of
Pet~oleu~ Contractors, Inc., a~d Mr. Anthony Konzen of GTI.
Cpon Mr. Schreck's approval, the three underground fuel tanks were
re~aved T.v:.":h a crane. The waste oil tank was rernovoed with a
backhoe.
The tank designation and condition were as follows:
/ '11'1 ,', 1I1I"/{'II1"lIlllI,-/ ',. I ,III,/,{d .ill,{llr,-,.,,"b
5-?1$
'"
z
o
Vi
;;
w
a:
t
-
....
IT -7'
if
w UJ
~ ....
-< -<
0 0
r'
__ I
~ $
-, :t;
, .
~
w >-
~ '"
-< ,.. 8
0
~ 0
>
(3 ~ 0
Cl. -< ~
w 5
c:
\~'
1
~
~
,,,,\
~
~ 0
'!! ;::
~ g
.... ~ --
~ 0 ~
d q in
{\ .,. ,\ <II ""t'Q" ''-''V''~ ( I'.i~':-" \\ ~'""h' ~.~~\" ,'..., ~~'0
,:/{1 '- "W)I"\a'L4'~~- 'f't)~1 ? ~(",-j,ri" :\ '), '~('~""'r' ~I -~'Y .~'{'
"ml\rTr ' 1 :\_ ~ _),-. . J ~c.-\' " '" - I, '.' '", ,. ,.^ .r ~ ..,,'.
..... \..., \1 '.....~ ..\ - tjo I '1'1t~}', 1o.~..:,n, ....'-O~. . j
, " ,_.-'" '\ \: - .,..::, " ')' './.-"-<i' ~.., ~\-
.. 120 ( ,_.::=" 1\ _ t;.J. ,.7 a ~ ,"\ . ./' /O"'J L.~ Ca ... .~ J.'y\" ~ o().
"~ <' \"jJ..:.:\,,;, \ i-.\:""')!{,;\I'i;4, ?'v;rr;i, :.~j-,::
if W' '~\'_"'.Y"~ ,J'\ ,>" '\~ -" - \\ .,."',.,, (\~'\"I '.... ~~. '.-<
I.. I' <.t. '" '\. ,--" 1--~ do" , &;_ ,
,------,. ,'/ " ~' ---" X'~ ' .-:.-,......- t . '1 .. - .,k'~"" " .'
~,,1!. )"" ,( ft, 1 ' ~ " __, C':....
" It-" ~ " II.... I \ J \ \ . ,...----- J - r
\ -.". ~, \..... _ c",,,>'
\' ~' ? .<;:w~..t..",... ....., \ (\5...... ("l. .... \ ~._ _~ ~ "",,:-,
1" \;-' ,),...-:{-,"'''"n'''~\\\'\,k\!~''-\r,1~~~' "'~ ',.....~. \;'\"'-.4""-,.;;;,,'
....1' v, l.\ ,/<; ..J\,..J,.... ".,,0" 'Q ~ ~ ,'J '~ '
'~ 1"\ " I", \ -'.\ .:;..---," ..r<' \"" \ 'I . " ~. )0 '-~.
II,) -" ...-, ". "', 'r I I ~~ .' ,
.....1' \ ~ I. <,' 1(""'"'1r", ; ~ . . . .. - I "..' - ,
'\ \"-f ~_'\ "l~i .....\'","~. ._"," ,. I .::.__>r' .<9" "
\- ,.. ""L \ '\......... \ ".. ,-- VlIe \ 1,.
} ;'.~ ..\ ~ -~ \'~l . ... "" ,.-:-- ... -~. - ... ~.' (!'~. Bonita :
~ .-'''.'." C-.-' ,..' ~ ./' '.' ,:. 'r' " '\ ,
,.'Oc:,'. ,~,,' ,.:::.., ~;-"" i ,,- \\ ,..\ ~)': . - ", Gnlt'Cou", :"
~' O~_.~" , ". .\," " ~ ....;~,. U~! ' \
Qt'_ ~.. '.. 1\,. .\ '1'_ r. ?::='- 1 f II ",
\'- ... \\ ---., ./~'l\"._'~)" ____~." l.,1.....1,~,....__- ~ ~ ~, . (oy1.... .' : ' "
p"" ,,\... ; .-':......., ~\; '\ " .\,~- " '\J' .,.- ~,.., ..,
\ ..." s'" ..... ," -- " ,
......... . ,,~..,. 'I,~\\ \ '}..' ...~- .", '(;
, \ 'to , \........ . \ , ~.. . -').... _ ,.1' ,
. \'XI ..' .-t ..\ - \~td\ ""',.", . It" , __~~,..?
~"No ('I \". -". \:':.; \, ~....~\I\$,.. -: ~ '\ ...-- .....'i'g
"\0' , , _.-d \\" t\:A.,...e,'O\' . I ~ 1 . .$" ,
-<. \"'Z. ~. \:\':\ ,- \)......-:!'>1 .' ," .' ....,\\ \ lr'v '-:-
'\'" .". \ .~ .....-'t I. t , \ (:) -f<~- E
n.' \1 \.. - b \ \ _-:"'~:-::"" _ . 0._ \,8"
, '. \1"1 (,\.....;.- ~ ~ \ .~ ,_.,............ '. - . !~' ~-~ 8 :.1\-
11\ \ '!' S1~~'-\, . . ,.. " ;;:::::".
\~~\: '.. I>,,.,.. , ~\,,",),' nOO. ' r- ." ,II ~I..'k" J j,.no..,,, ,.-' ~ ,
\'.\ ,~ ,;"-' . P". .., - H 0.......' '\ s.. tQ,-' -....,;! ,i-" -
. 1"\ .. "\' _-.. \ ,,os _:~ ...\' \ __~_..
~\"\ '>> .I)....J":~..".C'> ,- <:>jl' \- .... \ \-- .', .......-:- 1_lj
O\I\,!- ~",-,-", ,. . 'r:::" ~, ~' f ''!.- ,
C'I _. \-, ' , :;-- ~ \
- O. --I'\\~ ;'~''''''' ___-..' \ Sf --~..::--
~V,~, -1\~\ \..- ~_ \ .\)\\.\ \ \ }~ -;.-~ ~h '\ .I~~;jel:1
'''. ,. ,,\ .'-,--\ __<I' 1 "\" \ '''-....\ Q , \ \, "'''--- - :,-:;;1';~'
, " -- -" \ 1 .--......".~ . ~ l-/ '
\ " '. '; ,'. . \" ---" 0 \ ___ '~ / , -
I ';, ,< \~\ nk \-' \ ,.\ \/\ ,,' t. '.;;\ \' \ \ ' ~ i \>~ I.._:'~,\
\.., '\,1';' I '\ ""' - ""t", ~ .. \ \...- . "'\."-\- .J-~~-~... I
, ,~ - \ ~ ' ...... ~"- '"" \~ O' ~". .... ..' ..".., ,
---'--: Co, ...,r\",--, -----}...__.'-__ -I-\_"A_\,\L\ \;,o:,<':L'..-">-'-'-' -,:~~ \\ II
- '~.. -\ 'o\ ~ . ____-I ~ _\'\"\ i>---'i ~, 1 ---*-~-,...-:-_
~_::-" \';:) '!' \ '< '.,,~ ,_I \ . 5~' \- \ \ 0\_\.... \ \ .."-"'" \ ...~ , ' ~
".., \:0, 'i~-;;;;,:,l' ";_.:..!. .~\~\. '\ \ ';J~\~;\.\ - '(;'\-'.~~.'i~BJ2<)rJ 'bJ--\~~~\ . ~~.>
. , \' ,<,'. ',-.. "\c,.,,.l""\, --fJ '-Sj':::::J, s' .."
_, \ '\' / ,~" -",,' . - "r
'..-::' \ (, P-:j",,:, 't...... ,..";:,,\ \' "'""'1..1:0' 'I) ~....... '",- ~ I \ "'"
.... ',. ~ \. \ ' _ '\II ~ '\ ~ 0; T ___ t' ,........ \ _ J'.. '\, ' ;.:;--
...-: \~j \.0" ." 0.:'.... ~-. \. . ..' ....t',.. I 1\
..' "{;." ,.,~\~,. ~I(\\ '~.:::t~ ~j('~~;~r-:\~' :\~.'\; "~~~:".\\" - ~.. ~~-~~G\ f..});"({,
~ ~ \ \ .. \_\ ~. - ;-- ~ \..j" 't,sr"l'\l \ ~,,,--",Ie-....... ~'-' ____;;::-- \ Ii
'" ~ ,. J ,- -. -" : ", ~ (I, -- " _\ S__"'" " .
~';\ \: ''''S<:'' '.... "". .\ 'CUULi\'\~' ISTA:,. ~I;\ ,t"",) ......-"";:--
~ I>' ~,\ \\' -I'''",'; "'""""'''..\:. __ "i.;.~s<n-;,.rL"""1.rf""" \...---. ". \-
____________ -1\ -,):j ,'-,'" '...,~ ...s,",' . ~', '" <".\5,..."" \ '\ , ~ \~ .'"",
\ ,,~\ ~\ ,,"~ ---- P""" \';..' \"" I"\\"'~ ,. t........ .'" \"'-
~ I ,.\rll1l"',~\." ,.I ,......~ <. "\' 0~- ----;:;_'S.':") L.,'
. . \ .... ,)II,. " -, '.~..J' - '" ... '..... .
- . ,'!' ~ , ,~ ,- ~r~ \' _ '" --<I \. ... '"" , !,"" '\ .,
- c. ' ....11 ~. " . I - \' \,. -- 'I .. " ' .-;. ~ ~ ,,' t...... ..
... ,~. I" II" -\ ""'D""~; '0 i'" II- ~ .f:...... "'--\:.,(:5 \
'~~\. ~ ~ -.---- \ !.....'.- (-_/ ~ .~~ '\ ....,.--("~.. -~)--
../ 8:,1!.\-, \ \ \~\ \ ~, ...........-\ ""-:-' )~\:.. -r\ \ ..'(\?.~t"" 1 u."1,, "",,.~ '
" t r"'\\." . ,\" ... :\ ..- '\ ~.. ,1, .~,(. ___ Sr!\.'?
-<. '.. 1 \ ,. "."" .. \ ~ \' ) ',> I
_;--r .\\\\.,~ . \ \ \ \ \'.s" ;',;;,:... r _"=,,,..:, X 1. '\ __-~\ .. . ......~" L.'
.- \ \ \' '\ " ".. ." ........~ ",,,.. "\.. ,.- \. '\ ~'"/--''' ,
\ II I .. - ' \ \. , .. ',' ~ \>..1 , ....- L - 1.'Jl ~
, ' "....., \\ \. '~ \ \ I\Jd '\.
" " \\(., \,':"\ \--, \..... \, \ \: ,- \........' ,~
'"~. \- '.. \\ ,_ 1, ',,-~. ~..-.- Roy club \ ... ~ ,
'\.'.:0,<:",\\ ,,~.,,\... ," \.'_' ';\'J ,)- \ II "'D '~_'\S<J~''"
,- \~~t.\ \. ',' \ ~~(~. \ ~ '\ ___..\\ 5'_:\ \ :,~ _,c \.'S,;"
,\,' ":;", '-? ;,\", " \ ' -, ~,.-".., \ \":;, . ....C. ~I\ ;:,V r ___.-"<<:~-"....
, ~ \ ~ " r-: '( ~ '\ ,')" '(" .... \ I ...t~_ ~ ~-- ,. ,
0\\, \ nll'UN '- \ "~\\'\\._,,.....~\;, -',1\ ,\' ..~-::-'
U,$,G,$, OU^O, ~I^TIQ~ML CITY. C^, PliO TO REV, 1975
~
SITE
o
2000
4000
I
SCALE IN FEET
8m' GI SAN DIEGO
CROUMOWA TER
TEOiNOLOC"(
SITE LOCATION MAP
S"?r FiGURE 1
. .
uo, UO_' kI... ..l"". .:;.kI
U.O.1~ ",)J ';':tH~o
!,,:jkUlii"';UWAlbk l.t.CH
Ill.] UU2
Mr. Jody Hadley
April 21, 1989
page Two
Tank 111
HMMD# SD AT14U
This was the 10,OOO-gallon Unleaded gasoline fuel tank. The tank
was positioned at the eastern end of the tank pit and was oriented
north-south. The southern portion was the "turbine end" and the
northern portion Wiil.S the ":1'111 end" (Fig. 2). Minor pitting and
corrosion were noted on the tank bottom. There were no apparent
holes in the tank exterior. The soil in the tank depression showed
no visual indications of gasoline bearing soil or gasoline odors.
Tank 112
HMKD:f BD AT1484
This was the lO,OOO-gallon Regular gasoline fuel tank. The tank
was positioned at the center of the tank excavation and was
oriented north-south. The southern portion was the "turbine end"
and the northern portion was the "fill end" (Fig. 2). No holes
Were evident in the tank exterior. Minor corrosion was noted on
the tank bottom. The soil in the tank depression showed no visual
indications of gasoline bearing soil or gasoline odors.
Ta:bk 113
HMMD:f SD AT1484
This was the 5, OOO-gallon Supreme gasoline fuel tank. The tank was
positioned at the western end of the tank excavation and waii
oriented north-south. The southern portion was the "turbine end"
iil.nd the northern portion was the "fill end" (Fig. 2). No holes
were observed in the tank exterior. Minor corrosion was noted on
the tank bottom. The soil in the tank depression showed no visual
indications of qaiioline bearing sailor gasoline odors.
Tank ''I
HHMD# SD AT1484
This was the 1,OOO-gallon waste-oil tank. The tank was located in
an excavation at the north end of the site. The tank was oriented
east-west. The "fill end" was located at the western portion of
the tank. No holes were observed on the tank exterior. Minor
corrosion was noted on the bottom. The soil in the tank depression
showed no visual indications of waste-oil bearing soil. A
rectangular slot was cut on the tank top by the contractor, to aid
in tank cleaning.
s- gd
<f)
z
o
in
:;
UJ
<I:
~ ~
~
,
~ .\
" '-
""
\.)"- ~
'Jj
\..":--'
......
~ ~
-< -<
o 0
(-'.
,
.J
1.
,
.:l ,,~
~. ,~--'
'"
,) "I..
~;'I 1;;1
-<
CJ
~
<I:
2
UJ
<I:
)-
rD
Z
s:
g
@
>
~
...
V
>." "
" '"
~
" ,^ ~
0 ")
" ~1
~fJ' , ,
'0
\"
;j
\l") 'II
~ "
"
\, ~
"'j '.
~'
" ~
!!J '\ >=
~ 8
~ .. -'
dj ~ ~
a in
w
:::>
z
w
>
<(
I x
f-
a:
:::>
o
LLI
i '"
lJ
Ir 111
II
o
,
ALLEY
FENCE
~STOCKPILE FROM
TOP OF TANKS
~ TANKS
'Y $ ".:.>'~
/If. /' '". .:-:~' " --',
,," " ;' ~ /' ,". ....~.........
.' :' /" ..:' ,. .'^~ ;
). \ ") '.. () '. ,
'~J/.." '.~' ;t"
/ " , +- /"
\ // :.'l..,:~/ ,c // /
\. .....~" u //
" -'''; /.. ".'//
\ '0i:" I :y
~~)/
I - .'-
I
'-0-- PRODUCT LINES
I
0--EXCAVATED AREA
E STREET
SITE BOUNDARY ~
112D1
. fILL END
o TURBU,E END
20
40
APPROXIMA TE SCALE I~I r-EET
~
IE'R:~I SAN DIEGO
, I GROUt'll1'W^1'ER
I .,j rEOfl'lOLOGY
x
SITE PLAN
5 p 8 I FIGURE 2
Mr. Jody Hadley
April 21, 1989
Page Three
Soil Samole Collection and Analvses
A total of nine soil samples were collected from the fuel tank and
waste oil tank excavation floors, and product line trench (see Fig.
J and Table 1). The soil samples were obtained with a backhoe
bucket. Sample locations were chosen by the San Diego County HMMD
representatives.
The soil samples were collected and handled in general accordance
to the attached QA/QC form. Samples were shipped to GTEL
Environmental Laboratories in Torrance, California with a chain-
of-custody. An additional chain-of-custody form was completed by
the San Diego County HMMD representative and submitted with the
samples. The HMMD also placed a tamper-proof seal on each sample
container.
Soil samples from the fuel tank excavation and product line trench
were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH as gasoline)
and BTEX by modified EPA pe~hod 8015/8020. Samples from the waste
oil tank excavation were analyzed for heavier-chained hydrocarbons
by EPA method 4lS.l.
Laboratory analytic,,-l :-esults, soil sapple locations, and
addi tional information is listed 1:1 Table 1. Laboratory reports
are attached to this report.
Site Hvdrooeoloqv
As mapped by Kennedy and Tan (1977) the site is underlain by the
Pleistocene Bay Poi:1t Fo:::-macion and an unnamed nearshore marine
sandstone consisting of a ligh': brO'..Jn or a pale brown, fine to
medium grained, fossiliferrous sandstone.
As observed during soil sampling, the site is underlain by:
o Backfill in the fuel tank excavation consisting of grey
brown, clayey fine to medium sand to approximately 10
feet below grade.
o Fill obser:ed in the '.:aste oil tank excavation consisting
of a red brown. clayey fine sand.
o ;'.lluvium or scream terrace deposits consisting of red
brown, we~l-g~aded, TIedium to coarse sand. This deposit
'..Ias observed f:701.'1 app:::-oxir.-.ately 10 feet b~lo!'/ grade t~
the botton of the tan,; excavation (approximately 14
feet) .
~ GROU:'>DWATER
TECH:'\OLOGY. I:'\c.
-G-K2.
ALLEY
SITE BO'UNOARY
on
Z
o
Vi
'>
w
a:
FENCE
I H'e- -.lal
L__...I
"-
~ 0-'
I ""
"
C\ "- W
- =>
'"
\]- ":> Z
\j-, W
W ~ >
')-' ....
-< -< <(
0 0
:r:
P, I-
a:
i =>
c 0
1 (II
, ll..
" ~ 0
-<..1: , '< :::i~
-
,"" ''C
"
"-
~ ,..
IX>
-< ,.. 8
0 .:J
.... ~ >
a: ~ 0
0 .,
fu ~ ~
c: ~
,
I
'-.- PROQUCT LINES
I
~
.
\.J
\{ >..:
, ~
" '.
".'" "'-
0, ~
, , ~
" '"
~'J, ~
~': :)
,
" .'
~ ij ,,("\j
~ 1
"-
., ~
---.: " '"
"
:c ~
\II ,
" ....
~ g
.... . ~
~ ~ I:
d ;;
E STREET
A. SOIL SAMPLE LOCATION
o
20
40
APPROXIMA TE SCALE IN FEET
EE~ SAN Q,EGO
i "I . GROUNQWA 1"'ER
, T'EOINOLOGY
SITE PLAN
S .gjURE 3
Mr. Jody Hadley
April 21, 1989
Page Four
According to Mr. Jim Munch of the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB), the site is in the Sweetwater Hydrographic Subarea
(HSA 9.12) of the Sweetwater Hydrographic Unit (HU 9.00) as
designated by the RWQCB (SWRCBjSDRWQCB, 1975). The Sweetwater
Subarea has existing Municipal (MUN) , Agricultural (AGR) , and
Industrial (IND) beneficial use designations for groundwater.
During the tank removal event and subsequent soil sampling,
groundwater was not encountered in the tank excavations.
Conclusion
o On March i4, 1989, GTI observed the removal of three
underground fuel tanks and one underground waste oil
tank.
o Visual observations and field evidence did not indicate
the presence of gasoline or waste-oil bearing soil.
o Soil samples were obtained from the fuel tank excavation
floor at each end of all three ~ank depressions.
Laboratory analytical results indicated that the fuel
tank €xcava~ion floor contained no detectable TPH and
BTEX concentrations.
o Two Soil samples obtained from the waste oil tank
excavation had T?H concentrations of S ppm and 11 ppm.
o A sample obtained from a former product line trench at
the southern end of the fuel tank excavation contained
no detectable TPH and BTEX concentrations.
If you have any questions or comments, please call.
Respectfully submitted,
GROU W it< TE~OLO~~ C.
/, / j V
",,'1 0.C/ 00 c.-,
Anthony D. ~Qnzen / ~
HYdrogeolc~;ct .
i/
05~ 3k!/
Barry S. Pulver
Professional Hydrogeologist
RG 4236 CEG 1364
ADK/nb
cc: Dan Lynch
~"
./ .'::':' ',".< .~-.... ',. ,"/", '.
/ <.1,-: . '_~. ..... . _; ..0. ,
f ;::::'
; ....:
,,'
..
,.
.
',":
,
;".'
. -~N;WATER
TECHNOLOGY, I:-<c.
S'SLf
REFERENCES
California Water Resources Control Board and California Regional
Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region (9), 1975,
Comprehensive water quality control plan for the San Diego
Basin (Basin Plan).
Kennedy, M.P. and Tan, S.S. (1977) Geology of National City,
Imperial Beach, and Otay Mesa Quadrangles, Southern San Diego,
California: C.D.M.G. Map Sheet MS29.
Munch, Jim, 1989: Personal Communication
Ir~
~ GROLJ:>OWATER
TECHNOLOGY, INC.
S,B..5
TABLE 1
SOIL SAMPLE TEST RESULTS
Sample Sample
Samp Oes;gna. Depth r P H
L 0 C a: on t j 0 n ( Fee t ) . e X (ppm) Comments Tanle
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
. e C. 1 17 -loID 'Ne 'ND 'ND 'Ne Taken in 10,OOQ-gallon
native coarse Regular
sand.
a e e. 2 17 He Ne Ne He HD Talcen in S,aeO-gallon
n at i ve coarse Supreme
sand.
e eC-3 17 He He Ne Ne He Talc.en in 5. OOO-gaL ton
n at; ve coarse Supreme
sand.
D C C - to '7 HD ND He He ND Talcen in 10,000-9atLon
native coarse UnLeaded
sand.
E C C . 5 17 ND Ne ND He HD Talcen in 'O,OOO-gatton
na t i ve coarse Reg u l a r
sanc.
C C - 6 17 HD Ne ND HD He Taken in 10,OOQ-gallon
n at i 'I e c:Jal"'se Unleaded
sand.
y c: . 7 12 3 Talc.en in 1,OOC-gallon
:"Ia::ive clayey '.JaSte Oil
sana.
, e:.8 10. 1 :: 11 T a i( en j, '.000-9allon
n at! ve eta y e y .... as:: e Oil
sand.
e c - 9 2,5 He He HD He He Talcen ,n
clay~y sand
( f il t ) :Jnder
former product
l ; ne t r e n c h .
[,I. GROUND\\'ATER
TECHNOLOGY, hc,
S. 81e.
~:
1 )
2 )
J)
4 )
J)
Samptes CC-7 and CC'6 w~r~ tcst~d tor heayi~r'chained hYdrocarbons by EPA
Method 1.18.1.
T~e remaining samples were tested for total petroleum hydrocarbons CTPH as
gasol ine) by modi fied EPA Method 801S/8020.
For sample location refer to Figure 3.
SampL~ d~pth below lot grade.
.~D Hot detected
Benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, and xylenes C9TEX) concentrations in ppm.
~ GROUNDWATER
TECHNOLOGY,INC,
5- 8?
SOIL SAMPLING
TECHNIQUES AND QU~LITY ~SSURANCE
GR1\.B SAMPLING
To prevent cross contamination and maintain the integrity of each
soil sample, the following procedures are performed. Each soil
sample was:
1.) Immediately placed in a pre-washed Mason jar.
2.) Tightly packed to reduce air space.
3.) Capped with aluminum foil.
4.) Sealed with plastic lids.
5.) Waterproofed with duct tape.
6.) Properly labeled with complete custody forms
7.) Placed in a cooler and chilled on ice.
8.) Delivered to a state certified laboratory.
All soil samples were frozen and stored at the laboratory for 30
days in anticipation of the need for subsequent analysis.
11_I~J GI!OlJNI>I\',m:H
il . II I TECIINOI.OGY, INC.
S-SB
IGTEL
ENl/llIOUPlAfNfAl
~ LABORATORIES. INC.
Western Region
4080-C Pike Lane, Concord, CA 94520
(415) 685-7852
(800) 544-3422 Irom inside Calilomia
(800) 423-7143 Irom outside Calilomia
Pagl? 1 of Z
3/21/89 .it
mo,! ECT ~IGlt:
TEST RESU L TS
SMII'LEO:
RECEfVEIJ:
"!tEI'MIEn:
,INAI.\'ZEn:
~I,ITIHX :
UNI'I'S:
Tony I\OHZen
Grollll(h'ater Techllolog)',
IIIOO-C Roselle Street.
SI\II Diego, CA 92121
212-175-3B37-1
[] Street & 4th
Chulrl Vista, CA
3/H/89
:1/J6/89
:i/ lG/89
:!/17/8!J
Soi 1
nlg/kg (l'Pnl)
Inc.
"!tOJ ":CT #:
LOCATfON:
IJY: T.
BY: C.
BY: L.
BY: R.
KOllzell
~Ieba"e
CUI"lin
I!su-Chou
Cmll'OIlNOS
~1lJ1. : L,\I\ #
: 1 . U. #
: Tfi3~ 1
:CC]
:TG:I52
:CC2
: TG:\53
:CC3
: T635,1
:Ce'l
:'1'6355
:CC5
----_.._.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ikll7.f~[H? 0.0" < 0,0" , 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.0:,
TQ!1Jellf? O.O~ < O.O!i < 0.05 < 0.05 , 0.05 < 0.05
E LI,y liJ('nzene 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
:<'ylenes 0.0" < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Total I1TEX 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05 < 0,05
Mi~c. Ilydrocarlwl1g 1.0 < 1 < 1 < 1 < I < 1
(CI-C12)
T"l,~l Petroleum 1.0 < I < 1 ( I < t < I
Ily(I"0('11 rlJoJls ns
Gasolin~
:
5~ g 'f
I~.I~N~
... 1 AlSO 1I'",10AI(S, INC.
I'llg~ 2 of 2
Western Region
4080.C Pike Lane, Concord, CA 94520
(415) 685-7852
(800) 544-3422 from ills ide California
(800) 423.7143 from outside California
PROJECT MGR: Tuny Konzen
rHO,II,CT #: 212-175-3837-1
LOCATION: Chula Vista, CA
TEST RESULTS
-
~IUL : LAB #
: I . D, #
Cml['OUNDS
: TG:!;J6
:CC{;
:'1'6357
:CC~
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dell7.E"lle 0.05 < 0.05 0.05
Toluelle 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
Et.hylhcl\7.P-lle 0.05 < 0,0:' < O.OG
Xy it'nes 0.05 < 0.05 < 0.05
To !.'" 1 I3TEX 0.05 < 0.0:; < 0.05
Hisc, Hydrocarbons 1 < 1 < 1
{(>I-CI2 )
Total Petroleum I ( I ( 1
Ilydrocarbolls as
G11so1ille
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~JI)\' : ~t~l.hod Detr~cti()1l Limit; compound I)plol, thi!=; l/?\;el wonJd not be detected.
IksldLs l'ol\!1ded Ln \.\~0 signiric;,\I1L riq:lln~s.
::ETIIULJ:
'Inrlifi"d EI''\ ,'leLhnrl "O~O/HOZO/H015
~{JCI/;J@.~tJ6lV1
REOECCA IISU-CHOU, DirecLur
5- ?lJ
~I~ ~
-I ~ 8 0 ~ g i< '"
~ o:~~~~ ~~
co x 0 CJ .~ - w
-< w c ;;; '" oD .~ r:
d-'V1~r:c:ri-5
::sw_tnUa)ou
(QOaEx~
>--cuo...
!--.. '- O'cD;:::;
-j- ~ 1..'1 15 ~ ~ . ~
_- O::J 0 .. .. <:> .~
(0 ::; I: v :0: I: a. y,
~ S<J~V1NO:Jn'ON _
~
~
a.
t
llJ SO&-m
8VW
~
a:
r:
'"
U1
a ncn
Qnos
-
'"
E
~~
_c'"
\&~ ~
0'" ....
-~~
a.<
..... .'..~~..~~-:~
~ i -'~I ..~ ~ ., ~
,,;j\ ~? ~'3' 1 h
;: ~ ~ 1 i ~ ~ ~'U
ti \I:~ ~'-'~i!~
------
><:><t:Y'><- xl><X::X
x >< ,/<:>< .>< >< xt><
1:::' '&,
~ -r
~~
"0
t..
o
U '"
c:; 1:::'
c::: '"
>- 3 ~=~~ l: I~ f'-\ ~ I", ~ ~ ~ {'- ,
~ ~ " ~~ \";) -0 M \ ~ TV] XV~1 ~ 12- ~
U'I '"
~ ~ I'Bl.~ T- ~ ~ \.::. ~ ~I><>< ~
? -< ~~X><'><X7->< X
~ ~ l~ 'L --: r:'~~ 11~ Ur;:- ~--=- '>L-':} "-::1 ::c
u ~ ~I z ~f~3r~ ~~ ~\~~ ~~ ~~ f~ ~
~ \:''0.- 0 I \ 1 \ \ I J -"
':'.'" ;::c~O~Q~D)lD~6y"D.\!:>\
-< ,~:::y g ~9&\(\~10~~ ~~0sili~&)i J)
)j; I~" ~ -' CV -: '-...J j!. '- i" '--' ... '- ~........ ;h '- -...J ~
1-". (;!Ni1~5\<'S-r-t-1I--Q'~~lt(l.
'> <(I ~ ' 0 8 0 " 8 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 8 Q a 8 D...
1-:51 11!!.;'>< 1.:2 '" 1/10 \1'0:1 -<.<:1 ""
') i J I::r, ,W 0 0 \C\ \r- 0 0 \r C D
-, '::1'-- ~I- !;; \(\ 0 C - N ~ .r- -j" \'
',' If" ~~ "" ~ =- =- = - := :::.. ::::: \-'
7 { u,:
t: ~ '- ijj
'> ~ cc
, ~ 5\ ~ ~~
'~ ~~ 0
~ ",::> z
L. '" ~
~co cr _ c-J
0.0 r: J .\
e..... -c 'V
.,~ U1 V U
"'~
~
c<" -:r '^ -3
J u u cJ
I:J v 0 tJ
r 0::> IJ
U cJ <..)
v cJ <:::J
>-
""
o
>oJ
'"
:=
o
z
-'
>oJ
0:
~
~:~ I E~
o~'1 I 0:: ~
\ <>)
~__r;. <....Q
c--.... "1' \--.~ -11, 9-
<. ~:.::~ :::;J -1-1 lj
'~-........:::::;;.cs ~
~~-~ >-~ :{
. .~__ ',~ '~r~ ~ I :.: ~
:C--~ :'o~ .z'- >oJ1J..\J';; >-
.=-- L. ,.. > i~::;
~ .3 _~ ~, 5 ~ 3 ~ ~
,,~ ~ ~~ E E ~ g. ~ E
~' In ci: 30: ~ ;\: ~
o 0
z z c3
~OO g'
o =
~ ~;,;
:.c fI:II-'
c ::x: 5
3 :::JE
&J -' C &J
4) U U 4) L..
"Q-fOE:5
ECCo.Cf
., 0- ::c u
U') "C <<i U1 ex:
u <U _ ..,
.2: U1 .!! ~
U GUt..
Uo.UO
u., a._
c:r:...... V) Ul
~
..
o
"
.5
I-
4~
>- Ix: ~
~~ g
~ '-{J ft ..
~~~~~
Ld ~ ~
c:: c c
rMl ~ ~
..
-
..
'"
..
E'
;::
"
E
" ~
.3 ~
~ ~
'"
U1 ci:
..'
..rl~
c: cd>
,g C ~
.. ::::-
.3 ~ ~j
7.~ '% ?
]c>;~~
~2 '" <:> ~
,_ V1
~ ~ 0
I:
. r:
:0: '"
",.
.,.....y. O..-::::::J>
-' ~ E r~
~~;::~
\
~ <::
~{-... i
~\~
b::.." "
~~_ ~--....E
>-~--":':> ~Q Z ;-;-- >-
5i -;~ 3;.-"':t ~ u.. ~
0. -!" ,;;;0<.. ..~ _ I- 0.
E~'g...s E
.3 0:'-:, \;; ci: ,-J) 3
..
-
..
'"
..'
E
;::
>-
""
o
>oJ
~>
.. >oJ
0. U
E >oJ
~ 0:
..
E
.. ~
5 ; ~
~ ~ ~
C = E
'" '- 0
V> -'
"f<. .. ~
~ ~ E -.
b~ ;:~
I
.5- '11
-...
..I'Ilt,', ,f' '.b; ..~:A"'~'~'~.'j ..
.....
U1
UJ
:J ,
a
UJ
a:
U1
U1
>-
...J
<t
Z
<t
D
Z
<t
D
a:
0
u
w
a:
>-
D
0
.....
U1
:J
U
,
u..
0
,
Z
<t
:I:
U
,
:(
u
0
~'(J
-<,,;;
u"
,!;Q
~~
~Q
~;:::
- ~~
88
co .1.'
0
N
~'1]
u~
-'<'{(',
Q)U:;:
~D"'"
- "
un..:
o u~.
~ s",
II u::
. --
-q
LU ;~
1-'0
~~ ~~
u"
~n
SlN3V'j3\Jln03U ~NIHjOcl3U 1VI:J3dS
(A,,:J3dS) SllV'j11 NOI1:J3130 lVI:J3dS
,XV,/Sl'1'SI03^" " '..
(,^UP ..z) 3~'^103S U31103dX:J.
(J4 ~Z) 3~'^103S 3NO Al\IOOllOd ~
~ t--.
-".;"..IQ:;
7"'- ) <;)
,,--
~."- ~D
-v
~
:J8G nlS \ Q) - Q.) I1J I
UI'f ------ -;-'<: ,E_ -:::.'-..\1 E E'~l
- l~S X -= --- - - - - -\' - -I): ;;=: : - : ':
1031'1'M ~ /'- ro -f; ro' ;;--<
IlJf1QWV/:"J\uflIO^ ~-_ 0 ~ 0 o~
:;UJ"'VHJO:J' - , \ \:'1 0v)
\is tl ~ J- lt1 ~ t; ~ \;; \"'M~ .~ ~
~~~~~~~~i~: ~>-.~~
- M ~ tJ1' r't ~ \ "~r; ht; ~;;:
,~\11 :\',y y ~(I'\Y~ ~' ~17 I ~ ~ ~
, i ',. . \1 '- I '\, 'i!F - C" C" l"""
\' ,~, ~~ .'- .~ l"- I \. j ,? C ~ . ~,
'. <, \. \J \., ~ ,. 2 ~.C~.::t/
..J<.:J
q:Z
(J..J
we
a.z
(f)q:
:I:
a:
UJ
:I:
.....
o
\'-
'\-
I,.,--
0'1'31 :)'N'I'~\JO
IZ' 6C2/lZHIOZ~ LIOV31
'S[91O\^j !U9jnUOd I.lpoPd - Vd3
'\C'cV'j 9 . X01d3
'I"'oon H . 1'/'1':)
Oa9/~Z9 Vd3
.....
CfJ
w
:J
o
w
a:
CfJ
CfJ
>-
..J
q:
Z
q:
0~Z9/~Z9 Vd3
"'uO 'S~d'0909/909 Vd3
0909/809 V d3
OZ08/Z09 Vd3
0108/109 'l'd3
(1'SU') 'SuoqJe~Jp^H wnolO.l1Od [UIOl
(Z'&~v) an9J!) 'i I!O !CtOl
(~'&~p) 9SU9JD 'i I!O 1'~10J.
(Oa9 JO ~(09) ,cnnor ,. Hd1
(oae JO 510a) 19s0'0 $9 Hdl
(~109l0ZOBIG091 .UII"".V ,. Hd1lX31S
\ '^ ~ ,{Ooo9/oo91 X31S
Vj 0; .0~"~'"
&~ \.D ~ '\ ':!: 31~\1
CD I'..... ,,0-
le 1N~
t\1 "" ~;,;./ '0
'-1 ~ ~i ~1Ja ~
':::~J E j" j.'~ ~
..~-:::::; ~ -'3,T-.::E~
.. ..... QJ a..
~,-,.... v
o \3 ~ ct;'~ Q.. {
~ JU: -... a. <0.5 v"--'
. ~ ,,"-.J ';o:~'-5
:!; "<D ~ i~: ~
'-.:) <.'P 1>--l: '
.~ "J\ .J VJ
~ C \.t}J-
(\. VJ ~) ( (-I- .2
ci Q' V '"
..s~Q {~~,
.:;z'f j '0;~
~ ~ ~ A \C.d '-.)
~ - r1-, c:
.... - ~ ~ I.) .Q
n:I .0 ~
c: E 0
.. ::I 0
~ '" z ~
1:1 "', 1:1 ti
a. "" - QJ !])
'0' ~ 5' 0'
31'1'0
1:13H10
3NON
3:)1 X
tONH
,:)H
i:J3HlO
:t!: ----
:X"
.c ::1-
m .cC:
...J ~ 0
---
(])
a.o
E_
m
rn
( ,
t---..
gJ
,-
;.,
.,~.....
. .,-
,
"
il~J'~'
~, "
...-' ;
t''i. ::.
.' '
, ,
, ,
., ,~,-m;:'\ f ",:
..... '."
, ~,:f;'
~ ...1. .,
.\.
.;,
"
~ \ .
;:::L\
\
':\
"
-.;.
-, )
--:.. ~ )
':!...'-.
i::::::,.;
~
/
\'
,
\
(>'<
~~
\
en
-c:
ro
E
w
\ a:
"
x'X
.
. X __: ' 10\,[ ..,c. 'y....
~ ~~ ~l t~;n !',
5- ~ ('1 . I
~ .,...,........
\ ""'1r;" :,i~.}::-i';:;':/\:'
"r1-~ " : :. ~
o
\ ~ '@ t
~ !
~cJ ~ ~
...-. -g L ~ ;1: ~ij~"'_-.. t-
,~ \, .(;;
u .- u
'" '"
" ex: ex:
2;
'\VI
'\
/
I-
U)
w
::>
a
w
a:
U)
(J)
>--
...J
<I:
Z
<I:
o
Z
<I:
o
a:
o
u
w
a:
>--
o
o
I-
U)
::>
u
.
I.L
o
,
Z
<I:
:r:
u
t
: "
I ~';/
~~ ,~
~ u. ',~~
0::'0 :-
Uo~
~ ~!
~ "
Uq
. 0"
-"
W;;
L- ~~
r-C,D ~:
>~
'.
~~
\
J~ ]~~
{e 'l;q ~
tn V-> ~ ;,;./ 'tJ
"':::--.. ~ ....~~
~ ~ ;,; ,~~ ~~
---011 E ~.2' ",'-<i>
;,; ~c...::::; ~ o-'17:.::e
CI'-J!'; u~~"'"'-.- a..
~E ~t~L
-(.:.. ~ \. 11-' <0' ~
Vi ~ ~1 -)_ .
~ co ~o~
-- \....... v- _ . lunOW'1fOlUIl\O^
d ~ ,~J G t -:: S~3NI'/INO:J'
..\~ Q I~-+d'" ~ 1:
~'( J 1)1= ~:3:5
~g d A~ -----
L.: - V. -
~ - ;;;"'~
01 - .c \ I.) :&
j " ~ ~
y : ~ ~
'0' -0 ......0 .~
n: ~ Q: a..
..JCJ
<(:<:
-..I
Ua
Wz
0.<(
U)I
?
U
'"
~'J
-< -
U'"
~
co
"'-
f:j'J
;'\~
~~
~'
"'~
S.1N3~3~ln03H ~NI.1~Od3U '1V1:J3dS
(^~1:J3dS) S.1I~1l NOI.1:J3.130 WI:J3dS
XV,ISW8H3^
(,~.p r-Z) 3:JI^H3S 03.1103dX,
(/4 ~Z) 3:JI^tl3S 3NO A.11t10IUd
a:
W
I
f-
o
Ii;
w
::>
a
w
a:
U)
1i1
>-
..I
<(
Z
<(
OV31 :JINV~HO
(Z'6~ZI1 Z WoZ~ LIOV31
'1BIOW IU91nUod ,.(IIJOPd . '1d3
'I.'.~ 8 . XOld3
'["'0\"1 LI -~V:J
oa8/~Z9 v d3
O~l:OI"'Cg VcHJ
,(jllQ 'S::)d-()908/009 Vd3
0808/809 Vd3
Ol09/Z09 Vd3
01001109 Vd3
(l"S l v) 9UoqJO:>OJP^!'! wnoj0110d IU\Ol
(Z"cu-) O~OOJD 'i' I!O Imol
(L'CLt') e~U9J~ V 110 II!IO.l
(oa8 '0 ~ I 001 10"lIor ,a Hd1
(OLZS JO S lOO) IOSO!O so Hdl
1~108IOZ081l091 OUIIO.OQ ,. HdlIX31e
_ ,.(020912091 X3.10
3~1.1
31VO
)(
:s
'"
::
H3H10
3NON
3:J1
I:QNH
I:JH
H3HlO
3DOmS
tl31VM
Q)
0.0
E_
rn
(f)
tllIf
110S
(
""
"&.
',-'.' -
i;j,,~.:
(-('I~~; .
'-/J!.~ -
",;:;.;:] .
x
--.......
i\ ;,
\
'J;t -- \
rzp, ~~ \
;"~ ;\
'?j:o ,
.' --cJ'!
V,.:,
~
~'
~, ~~
,', '-0
/
\
.
\
\ --
.. ,,-
.'J.
,
.
, '
\
(/)
-C
<t1
E
Q)
\ a:
,
, .
"
, ,
X. 'X
\ '..
x: y '-j. Y... --I... y.
~ ~"
~ g "H'J ".,
.:::t- :~. .;. .l
,'1;~' ,:;'
(
~
/
Xl
"'"
2:
-
CV\
\
\
~
o
~
.8
-l
\.
"
.---
1;-<.]
'0
OJ
.~ \
:rl 0
ex:
;.:.
.c ~ :j
"0 "C "
.~,~,<:~gi .
u' :1
OJ '
ex: , a: '
'x
\.
\' ~
\ Q) - a Q) I 111(1.
E ~ E, ~
x: - ~=+-~ 1= ~ 1='..:... I=~
1::-------1- -\ r="- ~ -N ~O'~ ~..Q
\. \ (Vi I.t' ~
\. . ~~
\i)7; ~ ~ 1r \~ ~ t; ?; ~ '\. ~~~ ~':'; ~ 1'1 ~
.u; ({) <'" (y) ("J m ~' ,I) .
~ \~ i::: ~ ~ ~ t,' ~ .. >0;" >0 fi
.c ~ .D _,,:. .CI .::;:,...
'To rC ~ ;j- l) '-.( ~v cr- \~<::-1J7;1N p'.: j ~
,I \ \ I I I I , C]'" g lr-
" \. ~ \. ,\.,1 ,'.. \. \1 \J 'C ,5 . .-
\. (- Cc \.. \J \ " ~ ( ~ C' _ ~ ' ~ 1\'
...
Western Region
4080-C Pike Lane, Concord, CA 94520
(415) 685-7852
(800) 544-3422 from inside Califomia
(800) 423-7143 /,om outside Cali/omia
1'/ j,
III' " lJAn
i!\\! lOlli/I 2 <1/989
I~.~I---
)1 (I
1.1 I
1":1'
.' I
- jl:"/
.' '
I ~.I~,~
__ lAIORATOAI(S, INC.
---...-
Page
1 of I
C:I/20 8H j t
S,\fIPLEO:
RECEIVED:
ANALYZED:
~II\TRI X:
UNITS:
PRO.lECT w;a: Anthony Kozen
Ground..ater Technology,lnc.
11100-C Roselle Street
San Diego, CA 92121
I'HO.lECT #:212-{75-3837-2
LOCATION: n Street & 4th
Chula Vista, CA
03/11/8~
03/16/89
03/17/89
Soil
mg/kg (ppm)
13Y:
13Y:
13Y:
A. Konzen
C. flel,ane
A. Tadros
TEST RESULTS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PARAfIETER: flDL
LA13 # : 1'6358
r .0. # :CC-7
:'1'6359
:rr.-8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total
Pet.ro [,,"m 5
Hydrocarbons
n
1[
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MDL = Method Detection Limit; compound helo.. tllis level would not be detected.
~~~;:~~~:rounded to tliO significant figllreD I II a
TPII = EPA 3550/11 A. 1 fi1./.L1-_~C:.CfJ~t?#!:..~-___~~q!~(__
IIEBECCA IISU-CIIOlJ, Di rector
5"err