HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1984/07/24 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, july 24, 1984 Council Chambers
7:05 p.m. Public Services Building
DUE TO THE TORCH RUN THROUGH CHULA VISTA,
THE COUNCIL MEETING STARTED AT 7:05 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Scott, Moore
McCandliss
Councilmembers absent: Councilmember Malcolm
Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron,
Assistant City Manager Asmus
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent
prayer. ~iayor Cox stated timat time people have a lot to be thankful fo~ noting
the torch relay whicl~ has just run through Chula Vista. He asked that in
their prayers, they remember the people who died in the San Ysidro tragedy.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUlES FOR THE FLEETING OF JULY 17, 1984
Council~oman PIcCandliss clarified a statement in tile minutes whereby it stated
Councilman Malcolm is a member of tile MlDB-this should read Councilman Malcolm
is a member of SANDAG's Task Force on Transit.
MSUC (Noore/hlcCandliss) to approve the minutes as clarified.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
PROCLN4ATION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF AUGUST 1 THROUGH AUGUST 7, 1984 AS
"NATIONAL CLOWN WEEK"
Tile Proclamation was presented to "I. G. Rountuit" (aka Dottie Sterberg)
representing the San Diego State University Clowns.
3. WRITTEN CO~4UNICATIONS
Request for change in tile ordinance regarding quantity of livestock
Mrs. Gale ~)oriarity, 1672 Ocala Avenue, Chula Vista CA 92011
Nrs. h~riarity asked that tile animal ordinance be changed to state "one horse
or two ponies."
MSUC (~lcCandliss/Moore) to refer this request to staff.
City Council Meeting - 2 - July 24, 1984
PUBLIC HEARING & RELATED RESOLUTION
4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
GEORGIAN CONDOMINIUMS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-2
Georgian Investors, Ltd. (Director of Planning)
a. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
GEORGIAN CONDOMINIUMS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-2
This being time time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public
bearing,
Director of Planning Krempl explained the applicant had submitted a tentative
subdivision map known as Georgian Condominiums in order to convert an existing
35-unit apartment complex on 1.08 acres located at 433 "D" Street in the R-3
zone into a one-lot condominium project. The project is exempt from
environmental review as a Class l lk) exemption.
The development as proposed meets the requirements of the Code for
condominiums wii~ the exception of the percentage of compact spaces (15%
versus 10%) and interior driveway widths (14 and 15 feet versus 18 feet).
Each of those will require a waiver on the part of the City Council.
Director Krempl showed slides noting the driveway widths, the site plan, the
carports to be constructed and the elevations of the project. He stated the
staff is recommending approval subject to the following conditions:
1. The owner shall install a street light lO feet west of the east
entrance drive (revise tentative map).
2. The entrance driveway approaches shall be widened to a minimum of 18
feet (revise tentative map).
3. The developer shall enter into a subdivision improvement agreement
with the City wherein all public improvements shall be completed
within one year.
4. All vehicular access and parking areas shall be constructed in
accordance with the City's subdivision manual. Paved areas shall be
designed based on the "R" value method with a minimum traffic index
of 4. The Engineering Department will inspect all paved areas for
conformance with structural section requirements. Said structural
street sections shall be approved by the City Engineer. An
inspection deposit will be required with full inspection costs to be
paid by the developer in accordance with City Policy.
5. All exterior building alterations and site plan revisions indicated
on the plans approved by Design Review Committee shall be completed
prior to or concurrent with the recordation of the subdivision map.
City Council Meeting - 3 - duly 24, 1984
Mr. Krempl added that prior to occupancy a compliance survey would have to be
done by the Building and Housing inspectors to see if all the conditions meet
the condominium standards.
Mr. Syd Xi'nos, 9619 Chesapeake Street, San Diego, 92123, consultant
representing the applicant, noted they are in compliance with the stipulated
conditions except for those in which they request a waiver: the percentage of
compact spaces {15% vs. 10%) and the interior driveway widths (14 and 15 feet
vs. 18 feet). He stated: 1) the compact cars are consistent with the compact
car mix throughout the State and 2) as to the entrances to the 35 units, they
are substandard for ~o cars but not a serious concern. ~. Xenos added the
only disadvantage with converting the apartments into condominiums would be
the displacement of the tenants. The applicant, |lowever, received approval
for the conversion three years ago. Mr. Xenos referred to condition No. 5
asking the wording be changed to state "Design Review Committee standards
~vould be met prior to Certificate of Occupancy or sale of the individual
units."
Mr. Gerry Ranglas, 944 Vista Del Monte Way, E1 Cajon, stated he is one of the
owners of the property. They initiated the condo conversion a few years ago
and notifieO the tenants this would be done but it would be a long time in
coming. As a property owner, ime is interested in maximizing his property and
asked for approval of the request.
In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' query, Mr. Ranglas stated approximately
10% of the units are vacant at this time and this is an average.
Speaking in opposition were: Mr. Terry Kei~l, P.O. Box 2824, Chula Vista
92010, (speaking for a friend wimo lives in the complex); Mrs. Kaide Hodges,
433 D Street, Chula Vista; and Robert Merry wllo lives in the Georgian
Apartments. Their opposition in summary was:
1. Most of the people living in time apartments are Senior Citizens and
would be displaced.
2. The resident Manager quit his job.
3. The people cannot invest in condominiums since most of them are on
Social Security.
4. The owners cannot bring the apartments up to condominium standards
unless they demolish the entire buildings.
5. Tt~ere are no firewalls as required in the project.
6. Tilere is not sufficient parking to meet tile City's requirement.
7. There is no way a fire engine could get into the back of tile
project.
8. The plumbing in tile apartments needs to be looked at.
City Council Meeting - 4 - july 24, 1984
9. There is only one apartment that is vacant at this time.
ll. In the last ll years, they have gone through three owners and
numerous rent increases.
12. The tenants have felt insecure for the last few years due to being
notified the apartments would be converted to condominiums.
In rebuttal, Mr. Terry Kei~ stated the people who are on Social Security
could not afford to live in the apartments because the rents are too hi gh; the
resident Manager did not quit because of the condo conversion - he was over 70
years old and retired. In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' query, Mr. Keith
stated the apartment rents range from $450 to $600 per month.
There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearing was
declared closed.
Council discussion followed regarding relocation assistance; the 120 days
notice given to the tenants of the intent to convert; the 60 day Right of
Refusal to purchase a condominium; fire protection being the same for condos
as multi-family development; the interior and exterior walls which have to
meet building requirements; the legality of the City Council and Planning
Commission allowing a conversion; standards being adopted some time ago for
condo conversion and the opinion not to approve any waiver of the minimum
standards.
City Attorney Harron explained the concern of the Planning Commission th
proposing to deny the conversion was based on standards not in the present
ordinance. He stated if the Council wished to add other standards they should
declare a moratorium immediately on the project until those standards are
adopted.
Council discussion continued regarding the number of condominiums being
rented; the staff study on rental units in the City; the change in the market
cycle whereby rental units are increasing and sale of condo units are down; no
additional traffic generated by converting the apartments into condos.
In ans~er to Council's questions, Director Krempl stated the storage
requirements would be 256 feet covered on-site storage. The applicant will
make modifications to the patios and balconies in order to comply with this
requirement.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN ~OORE, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent. The wording of Condition No. 5 to be changed to state that
all exterior building alterations and site plan revisions to be completed
prior to Certificate of Occupancy and this requirement to be also placed in
the CC&R's.
The offer of the resolution failed by the following vote:
City Council Meeting - 5 - July 24, 1984
AYES Councilman Moore
NOES Councilman Scott, Mayor Cox, Councilwoman McCandliss
ABSENT: Councilman Malcolm
Mayor Cox stated the applicant can come back to the Council with a modification
of his plans which meets the condominium standards. City Attorney Harron
noted the findings by tile Council in denying the map is based on
non-compliance of the condominium conversion standards.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
a. Mr. Cliff Roland, llO0 Industrial Boulevard, Chula Vista representing
Brentwood Mobil ehome Park residents requested Council consider curbing
the east side of Industrial Boulevard from "L" Street to Palomar Street.
MSUC (~loore/Cox) to refer this to staff for review and report.
Councilman Moore discussed the funds allocated for landscaping the San Diego
Trolley right-of-way, asking staff to review the priorities - some of these
funds should be used in the internal part of tile City ratller than tile external.
CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 6-8)
Councilman Moore stated he has questions on a few of the resolutions on the
Consent Calendar. Mayor Cox declared there would be no Consent Calendar and
tile resolutions would be taken separately.
6. RESOLUTION 11707 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, TELEGRAPH CANYON
TERPJ~CE (Director of Public Works/City Engineer)
The public improvements required for Telegraph Canyon Road by the development
of ~elegraph Canyon Terrace subdivision ~ere completed in July 1981. A final
inspection was made on August 7, 1981. A letter of deficiencies was prepared
and mailed on September 10, 1981. ~he public improvement agreement was
approved by Council Resolution 9424 on December 19, 1978.
The original developer for Telegraph Canyon Terrace subdivision was
Joseph Lathers doing business as J-Len Incorporated. Mr. Lathers abandoned
his project and the subdivision was foreclosed by tile bank. The uncompleted
portion of the subdivision was taken over by Jensen Mortgage Company doing
business as Canyon Terrace Limited. Canyon Terrace limited bonded to complete
the grading work, construct retaining walls and do the required landscaping.
They did not bond for the public improvements tbrougl~ a Subdivision Agreement
supplement.
The subdivision ordinance requires that upon acceptance of tile public
improvements, the developer will post a 15% surety bond to guarantee the
public improvements against defects of material and workmanship for a period
City Council Meeting - 6 - July 24, 1984
of one year after the date of acceptance of the public improvements. Due to
the fact that these improvements were completed in July 1981 and no
deficiencies have appeared and the City does not have a valid improvement
agreement, the City Engineer recommended the Council declare that the intent
of the 15% surety bond has been satisfied and accept such public improvements
without the bond being posted.
Councilman Moore referred to the wording in the resolution whereby it stated
that the work has to be completed "to the satisfaction of the City Engineer"
and questioned whether this included the landscaping. If the steep banks are
not properly landscaped, erosion could occur. He wondered if the wording
should be changed to state "with the exception of the landscaping."
Mr. Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer stated the item before the Council was
the public improvements along Telegraph Canyon Road and not the improvements
to the interior of the project. The landscaping is part of the grading
operation which is a separate matter. Mr. Daoust stated he would look into
this landscaping factor.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
7. RESOLUTION 11708 ACCEPTING GRANT DEED TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
FROM MCMILLIN/TERRA NOVA FOR PARCEL 1 OF PARCEL
MAP 13297 (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
Mayor Cox stated he will abstain from discussion and vote due to a potential
conflict of interest. Mayor Cox left the podium at this time and Mayor pro
Tempore Noore presided over this item.
The developer, McMi~lin Development, has executed a deed granting fee title to
Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 13297 to the City. The lot will contain a pedestrian
walk and stairway from Bay Lear Drive to Vista Coronado in the Lynnwood Hills
area.
McMil~in created Parcel 1 of Parcel Map 13297 to disassociate the stairway
from Lot 15 of Map 10051. The City has an easement which corresponds exactly
with the boundary of Parcel 1. Maintenance of the stairway will be
accomplished by the City.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR PRO TEMPORE, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
Mayor pro Tempore asked that the offer of the resolution be rescinded since he
has some questions on this particular item.
MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to reconsider Item No. 7.
Mayor Pro Tempore questioned the rationale of having the stairway leading to
k~nwood Hills and not Vista Coronado.
City Council Meeting 7 July 24, 1984
Senior Civil Engineer Daoust stated that at one time, both stairways were in;
however, the one to Vista Coronado was taken out. Tile reason for the stairway
is for the students going to and from school.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR PRO TEMPORE MOORE, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
Mayor Cox came back to the dais at this time.
8a. RESOLUTION 11709 APPROVING AGREE)lENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND METROPOLITAN YMCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
(Community Development Director)
b. RESOLUTION 11710 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND SOUTH BAY MEALS ON WHEELS
c. RESOLUTION 11711 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AND SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL RESTAURANT
TRAINING PROGRAM
On June 26, 1984, the City Council approved tile Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) budget for Fiscal Year 1984-85. Included in that approved budget
were funds for the continued operation of the Sweetwater Union High School
Restaurant Training Program (Del Rey Nutrition), South Bay Meals on Wheels,
and for tile services of one half-time counselor for time YMCA Family Stress
Center. Agreements for supporting these programs must be approved before
funds can be released.
RESOLUTIONS OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOT1, the reading of the texts were waived
by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
9. RESOLUTION 11712 WAIVING BID REQUIREMENTS, APPROVING AGREEMENTS WITH
BURROUGHS CORPORATION FOR PURCHASE AND LEASE OF DATA
PROCESSING EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF
FUNDS (City Manager)
At tile june 18, 1984 budget hearing, the City Council approved an increase in
the FY 1984-85 Data Processing budget for the first year of a five-year
lease-purchase of a new central processor, related hardware and systems
software for the mainframe computer. Staff recommended purchase of a B-2925,
which will be Burroughs' front line processor.
In addition, staff Has determined that by changing internal procedures and by
adding an additio~al $1,900 terminal, the purchase of the $11,500 card reader
can be avoided. However, the card reader and its supporting interfaces must
be leased for three mortals to enable the changeover to a cardless system.
Consequently, staff has negotiated and submitted for Council approval a
contract with Burroughs for the acquisition of the central processor and
operating lease for the cardreader and NRZ compatibility equipment, plus tile
City Council Meeting - 8 - July 24, 1984
approval of the transfer of funds for the terminal (wtHch will be purchased
separately, probably from a vendor other than Burroughs).
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by
unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
lOa. REPORT HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGR/V4 CHANGES, PROGRAM
STATUS AND LENDER SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR
REI~BILITATION PROGRAMS (Community Development
Director)
b. RESOLUTION 11713 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH BANK OF AMERICA FOR HOUSING
REHABILITATION AND COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION LENDING
SERVICES
Recent changes in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) regulations
necessitate changes in the City's Block Grant funded housing rehabilitation
program. Additionally, the City's agreement with Bank of America for lender
services for the housing rehabilitation and commercial rehabilitation programs
has expired. Proposals for such services have been solicited and received.
The recommendation is that Council accept tile report and approve an agreement
with Bank of America for lender services relating to the housing
rehabilitation and commercial rehabilitation programs.
The Bank of America is recommended for the loll owing reasons:
{1) Leveraging is greater.
(2) Greater risk level seems of slight importance given program loss
history.
(3) Service history is excellent.
FISCAL IMPACT: ~223,000 in Community Development B1 ock Grant will be drawn
down from HUD and deposited with Bank of America as a result of approval of
the resolution.
Housing Coordinator Gustarson aOded that the CHIP loan committee recommended
adoption of this resolution. He noted Miss Lois Sears from Bank of America
~as in the audience to answer any questions.
Mr. Gustarson explained that out of the $2+ million, $230,000 is from grants:
out of that $32,000 will go to single family homes and $192,000 to mobile
homes. The maximum to one applicant will be $1,000.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to accept the report.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
City Council Meeting - 9 - July 24, 1984
Miss Lois Sears, Bank of America thanked the Council fo~ continued
participation with the Bank of America adding the bank has enhanced the
program in the commercial rehabilitation by committing a $2 million SDA loan
component which does not require any offsetting funding.
ll. RESOLUTION 11714 ADOPTING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY UNIFIED HAZARDOUS
INCIDENT CONTINGENCY PLAN IDirector of Public Safety)
At the March 15, 1984 meeting of the San Diego County Unified Disaster
Council, the Unified Hazardous Material Incident Contingency Plan for San
Diego County was adopted. The Disaster Council has asked each city to pass a
resolution adopting this plan.
The purpose of this unified plan is to establish the organization and
delineate the responsibilities of county and city agencies in the event of a
hazardous material incident within San Diego County. It applies to the
individual cities, unincorporated areas and events that require a
multi-jurisdictional response. The plan is designated as a policy statement
and response reference.
Director of Public Safety Winters stated the City's plan in effect at this
time would not be modified or changed by the adoption of the San Diego
Contingency Plan. In answer to Councilwoman ~Candliss' query, Director
Winters stated the department proposes to have further drills but there is not
one planned for the immediate future.
12. REPORT OF ThE CITY MANAGER
a. NSUC IScott/Moore) for a Closed Session for purposes of personnel and
litigation.
b. City Manager Goss reported the consultant hired to select the color of
the buses is ready to give her report. Mr. Goss suggested August 2 at
4 p.m. for a joint City Council/Redevel opment Agency meeting rather than
the 7 p.m. Redevelopment Agency meeting that evening.
MSUC (Scott/Moore) to accept the CityNanager's recommendation.
c. City Manager Goss referred to the memo submitted to the Council last week
noting the County's proposed modification of the Heal th Center rest
room. Councilman Scott indicated he needed more information on this.
NSUC (Scott/Moore) to set this as an agenda item in two weeks (August 7).
d. City Manager Goss referred to the staff's draft of the presentation to be
made to the Board of Supervisors on the Otay Mesa Subregional Plan. In
answer to who will be making the presentation to the Board of
Supervisors, the Mayor stated he could not because of a potential
conflict of interest. City Manager Goss said the Director of Planning
will represent the City.
City Council Meeting - lO - july 24, 1984
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
13. REPORT DISPOSITION OF GREG ROGERS HOUSE (Community Development
Director)
At a March 13 Council meeting, staff was directed to examine the question of
location and use for the Greg Rogers House. Based upon the research
accomplished, staff recommended the City Council as a policy decision, direct
that:
(1) the Greg Rogers House be relocated to the privately owned lot
located at 614 Second Avenue and placed in the ownership of Mr. and
Mrs. Lee Burch;
(2) an agreement be prepared wi~ tile Burches that maintains the house's
historic value and provides for the use of Block Grant funds on a
low-interest loan basis;
(3) staff continue to explore the need and feasibility of a downtown
historic row.
Mr. & Mrs. Burch will agree to a certain amount of public tours and are
willing to set aside a room, or a portion of one of their historic homes
within the block for use by the Chula Vista Historical Society, It is clear,
however, that because of tile neighborhood and use of the house as a residenc~
the level of public use under this option would be limited. For this, they
askedfor a subsidized loan similar to our CHIP program. Such a loan is
permissiable under Block Grant regulations.
Mayor Cox asked for a continuance of this item for two weeks. He was out of
town last weekend and was not able to read tile lengthy report.
City Manager Goss commented that this reflects a different approach to
Heritage Road. It is another option which the Council may wish to consider as
a policy for the Greg Rogers house.
Harry Griffin, former Chairman of the Resource Conservation Commission
extended support of the Burches taking over this home and renovating it.
MS (Cox/Scott) to continue this item for two weeks.
Noting another person in tile audience who wished to speak, the motion was
withdrawn by ~ayor Cox and Councilman Scott withdrew the second,
Mr. Marc Tarasuck, architect for Mr. and Mrs. Lee Burch stated he has been
involved in preserving buildings for over 15 years. He worked on tile Heritage
Park project, Brick Row in National City and a project in La Jolla. Mr.
Tarasuck stated that renovating old homes and having small gift shops in them
is not economically feasible. TIle Heritage Row homes are being converted to
office buildings at this time. The most viable way is for single family
ownerships to convert the homes.
City Council Meeting - ll - July 24, 1984
Redevel opment Coordinator Zegl er showed slides of the home and the area in
which it would be relocated.
Sub sti tu te Mo ti on
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to continue this item for three weeks to the meeting of
August 14.
In answer to Council's question, Director of Community Development stated the
Burches will pay for the entire amount o~ moving the building plus the $13,000
already spent by the City in moving the house. The department will attempt to
get the Burches a loan similar to the CHIP program for the rehabili~tation of
the building.
14. REPORT COST OF WORK FOR IHE 1911 BLOCK ACT PHASE XVI PROJECT
(Director of Public Works/City Engineer)
On june 21, 1983, the City Council held a public hearing for a 1911 Block Act
Phase XVI Project and at that time found that the public convenience, safety
and necessity required installation of said public improvements and ordered
their installation. Improvements were installed adjacent to six properties in
the Cityas follows:
Property Location Improvements Required
904 Fourth Avenue Sidewalk only
458-470 "L" Street Sidewalk only
1395 First Avenue Curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway,
sidewalk ramp
914-916 Fourth Avenue Curb, Gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway
1382 Hilltop Drive Curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway
745 Third Avenue Curb, gutter, sidewalk, pavement, driveway
Since the construction is completed and the improvements have been accepted by
the City Council, it is now appropriate to hold a public hearing on the
assessments to the various parcels. The City Clerk will be setting August 21,
1984, as the date for the public hearing.
MSUC (Moore/McCandliss) to accept the staff report.
15. REPORT REQUIREMENTS FOR CONSIRUCTION OF TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD FOR THE
CHARTER POINT AND TELEGRAPH POINT SUBDIVISIONS (Director of
Public Works/City Engineer)
The original Condition ~17 for Charter Point and Telegraph Point Subdivisions
~or improvements on Telegraph Canyon Road required extensive offsite work
prior to occupancy of the 105th ~,~elling unit. On April lO, 1984, by
Resolution 11591, Council amended Condition 17 of Resolution 11428 to allow
more dwelling units to be completed prior to tile construction of Telegraph
Canyon Road. The justification for that amendment was that the City staff was
City Council Meeting - 12- July 24, 1984
working on an overall plan between Charter Point, EastLake, and Gersten
Companies for the ultimate improvements on Telegraph Canyon Road.
The purpose of this report was to request Council concurrence of the tentative
overall plan. Staff will then work on an agreement between the subject
developers for the utlimate construction of Telegraph Canyon Road and for the
revision in the subdivision condition. The recommendation was to direct
staff to return with a resolution and agreement modifying Condition 17 of
Resolution 11428.
MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to accept the staff report and to come back with a
resolution anO agreement modifying Condition 17 of Resolution 11428.
16. MAYOR'S REPORT
a. Mayor Cox thanked the Council, Parks and Recreation Department,
Police and Police Reserves for their coordination in putting on the
July 4th fireworks display. Councilman Scott noted the heavy
traffic involved and the excellent way the police directed traffic.
MSUC (Scott/Moore) for a letter to be sent to the Police Department k~ith a
copy to the Reserve Commander expressing the Council's appreciation for their
work on the July 4 program.
b. Mayor Cox thanked the Parks and Recreation Department, especially
Jerry Foncerrada in playing a key role in getting the torch runner
to come +J}rough Chula Vista. The Mayor also thanked the Public
Information Coordinator, Mark Cox, for his part in putting on this
pro gram.
17. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. Councilsroman h,cCandl iss referreo to a phone cal 1 she received
regarding of the tree trimming along Third Avenue. Director of
Community Development Desrochers explained the tree trimming is done
through an assessment district maintenance contract. Councilman
Scott asked wily the small trees are not growing since they have been
planted some time ago. He also noted the "ugly asphalt" along this
area and asked ~hen this report, which was long due, would be coming
back to Council. City Manager Goss stated the staff is working on
the report with a plan to replace the asphalt.
MSUC (McCandliss/Cox) for a report back at the next Redevelopmerit Agency
meeting on the maintenance of tree trimming along Third Avenue.
The Council recessed to Closed Session at 8:55 p.m. The City Clerk was
excused and the City Manager reported the meeting ended at 9:32 p.m.
City Council Meeting - 13 - July 24, 1984
ADjOUR~ENT at 9:32 p.m. to the Council Conference scheduled for July 26, 1984
at 4:00 p.m., to the meeting scheduled for July 28 at 8:00 a.m. to intervie~v
candidates for boards an<) commissions and to the regular meeting of August 7,
1984 at 7:00 p.m.
WPC 0455C
MAR
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say:
That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista;
That the regular meeting of the CounciS1 of the City of Chula Vista was
held Tuesday, July 24, 1984 and said meeting was
adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED
HERETO:
That on July 25, 1984 at the hour of 10:00 a.m.
I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place
at which said meeting of July 24, 1984 was held.
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR ~ETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held July 24, 1984
The City Council met in the Council Chambers at the City Hall,
276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7:00 p.m. with the
following:
Councilmen present: Mayor Cox, Scott, Moore, McCandliss
Councilmen absent: Malcolm
, , , , , , , , ,
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting until July 26, 1984
at 4:00 p.m. in the C~ll El ..... ~/Conference Room, City Hall,
276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
I, JENNIE M~ FULASZ, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY
CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the
City Council at the meeting of _ July 24, 1984.
~IE M. FULASZ, CMC, City~erk
(City of Chula Vista, California