Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRCC AGENDA PK 1991/11/04negative declaration PROJECT NAME: Nosotros Culturally Specific Men's Recovery Home PROJECT LOCATION: 3 North Second Avenue, Chula Vista ASSESSOR'S PARCEL N0. 563-310-26 PROJECT APPLICANT: MAAC Project CASE N0: IS-92-05 DATE: August 26, 1991 A. Pro.iect Setting The project site is a 33,600 square foot lot on which there is an existing structure previously used as a group home. The site is on a bluff overlooking open space to the east. Other adjacent land uses include single-family homes to the west and south, and open space and the KOA Campground to the north. The site has been landscaped and there are no sensitive plant or animal resources on the site. B. Pro.iect Descriotion The proposed project would provide a group home for Latino men with alcohol problems, utilizing the existing structure on the site. The 1,500 square foot lot facility will be used as a residential recovery home, and two mobile homes will be used as classrooms. Since no remodeling over 500 square feet is proposed, school fees will not be required. All handicap requirements must be met. C. Compatibility with Zonino and Plans The project site is designated as Open Space in the General Plan and R-3 "Apartment Residential." The Chula" Vista Municipal Code requires a Conditional Use Permit for approval of a group home in an R-3 zone. With conformance to the conditions of project approval for a Conditional Use Permit, the proposed project would be compatible with the zoning. The group home is an existing use and the proposed project would not have a significant impact on adjacent open space areas since residents will use the grounds on site for daily recreation. D. Compliance with the Threshold/Standards Policy 1. E=ire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units must be -able to respond to calls. within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is 1 1/2 miles away and would be associated with a 5 minute response time. The proposed project wi7~~~// comply with this Threshold Policy. ~~ ~ss~ city o} Chula vista planning department atv of environmental review section CHULA VISTA -z- The Fire Department requires that all fire systems, including these in the mobile homes, be certified by a properly licensed agency as meeting all code requirements. Other requirements include: 1. All drapes, curtains, window and wall coverings shall be flame treated. 2. All exit doors shall meet code as to signs and latches. 3. 2AlOBC fire extinguishers shall be provided throughout the building, i.e., one for each 300 square feet. 4. Smoke detectors are required. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10°e of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The Police Department has indicated that an acceptable level of service can be maintained for this project. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The existing Level of Service (LOS) for North Second Avenue is "C", and the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 4,830. After completion of the project, the LOS would remain "C", and the ADT would be 5,070. The traffic generated would not exceed existing pre-approved uses. Dedication to meet the standards of a Class II Collector street may be required on North Second Avenue, and a street light must be installed. 4. Parks/Recreation The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/1,000 population. This policy only applies to residential projects, therefore, this project is exempt from the threshold. -3- Drainage The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Onsite drainage is surface flow to Second Avenue. Offsite, surface water flows north to a downstream curb inlet which outfalls to the Sweetwater River. The City Engineering Department has determined that these facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. Sewer The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The proposed project will not cause sewage waste to exceed existing use. Water The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards- are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Potentially significant water impacts will be discussed further in Section E of this document. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. A Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. The following impacts have been determined to be less than significant. A discussion of each of these less than significant impacts from the proposed project follows. Water Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. -4- F. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects The proposed project is not associated with any significant or potentially significant environmental impacts, therefore, no project specific mitigation will be required. G. Findings of Insignificant Impact Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. I. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the natural environment. The site is currently developed and there are no endangered plant or animal species present. There are no cultural or historic resources on the site. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. The project will not achieve short-term environmental goals at the expense of long-term environmental goals because these long-term goals will be achieved through the conditional use permit process, and the conditions of project approval. With compliance to the conditions of a CUP, the project will be consistent with uses designated by the zone and General Plan. 3. The project has. possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, 'cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. The proposed project will not result in any significant adverse environmental effect which are cumulative in nature, provided all conditions pursuant to the issuance of a CUP are fulfilled. The group home is not expected to result in secondary projects or have a growth inducing influence. -5- 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. There are not environmental effects from the project which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly. No public health impacts were identified in the Initial Study. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John Lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department Diana Lilly, Planning Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: "Maritza M. Garcia 45 Third Avenue, Suite 101 Chula Vista, CA 91910 2. Documents Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code General Plan, City of Chula Vista This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for the Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. ~~ ~ ~_ ~- VZLC~I.(-~ NVIRON ENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 12/90) WPC 9681P THE CITY OF CSULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. MAAC Proiect 2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. SEE ATTACflID 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No x If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, emplpyees, consultants or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Maritza Garcia Roger Caldwell Victor Lopez Warren Garcia-Stewart 6. Have you and/or your ofScers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _, No x If yes, state which Councihnember(s): Person is defined as: Myindividua~ frrm, eo parmership,jainrvcnture, association, soeialelub, fratanalorganization, corpo.nr~on, estate, host, receiver, syndteatq this and arty other eounry, city and country, city, n:unieipaliry, district or other politico! subCr ~ min, or any othn group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) Date: July 31, 1991 (A-113'v>:DISCLOSE.'I7t7] Signature of ntractor/app 'cant ROGER CAZARES, Executive Director Print or type name of contractor/applicant (RNISGQ II t!~yol MAAC PROJECT ROGER CAZARES, EXECUTNE DIRECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERNESTO AZHOCAR -CHAIRPERSON MANUEL R. CAMACHO -VICE CHAIRPERSON DOLORES ADAME -SECRETARY EDWARD NICHOLAS -TREASURER l) Anthony Venegas 6) Edward Nicholas Stadium Technician Xigh School Coach 90 E. Naples 1312 •F• Ava. Chula vista, CA 91010 NationnZ City, 92050 183-5503 (work) 477-5726 (home) 691-1219 (home) I/81 6/77 2) E 7) Victor Reaendez rnesto Azhocer Principal, Penn Elem. IMPACT Director 3932 Pe1m Drive 1615 Lenoitan Ave. Bonita, CA 91002 National City, CA 91950 575-5962 (work) 267-4741 (home) l72-1005 (home) !/74 6/78 3) Dolores Adame B) Juan Rodriquez Community Activist Nursery Worksr 250 E. Park Avenue 2211 Prsmoei, Apt. 5 San Yaidro, CA 91073 Vista, CA 92083 428-1618 (home) 598-9863 (home) 7/82 717-1492 (work) 7/87 !) Delfin Labao Retired 9) Annie Arroyo I901 Gamma Street Tex Complimcs Officer National City, CA 92050 Employment Develop. Dept. 262-2197 (home) 317 W. Bobier Drivs 8/74 vista, CA 91083 465-3958 (home) S) Nanvel R. Cemacho 747-2203 (work) 1/89 Teatro Xuaical Director 3717 Xeade Avsnve San Diego, CA 92116 ?81-8162 (home) l74-6784 (work) 6/76 APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN FOR OFFICE USE IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER Case No. r<_ 9e,or Deposit ~~_ INITIAL STUDY Receipt No. Date Recd City of Chula Vista Accepted by l A. BACKGROUND Application Form Protect No. ~- Sya,. 1. PROJECT TITLE "Nosotros" Culturally specific Men's Recovery Home 2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description) 3 North Second Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Assessors Book, Page '3 Parcel No. 563-31-26 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION To Provide a much needed service for Latino men with alcohol problems and to the oamiunity in general through outreach and educational efforts. 4. Name of Applicant MAAC Protect Address 140 west 16th street Phone (619) 474-2232 City niatinnwl rite. SLdLe CA jip 92150 5. Name of Preparer/Agent Maritza M. Garcia Address 45 Third Ave Suite 101 Phone (619)425-9171 City Chula vista State ~ jip 91910 Relation to Applicant Division Director 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals required: _ General Plan Amendment _ Design Review Application _ Public .Project _ Rezone/Prezone _ Tentative Subd. Map _ Annexation _ Precise Plan _ Grading Permit _ Redevelopment Agency _ Specific Plan _ Tentative Parcel Map p,p.A, Y_ Cond. Use Penait _ Site Plan b Arch.Review _ Redevelopment Agency _ Variance _ Protect Area Committee D.D.A. _ Coastal Development Use Permit _, Other Permit b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). _ Grading Plan _ Arch. Elevations _ Parcel Map _ landscape Plans _ Precise Plan _ Tentative Subd. Map _ Specific Plan _ Improvement Plans Other Agency Permit Soils Report or Approvals Required _ Hazardous Waste Assessment _, Hydrological Study _ Biological Study _ Archaeological Survey _ Noise Assessment _ Traffic Impact Report _ Other MPC 9459P -6- 8. PROPOSED PROJECT I. Land Area: sq. footage 33,600 sa Ft or acreage If land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose. 2. Complete this section if protect is resldentlal. a. Type development: Single family Two family Multi family Townhouse Condominium b. Total number of structures c. Maximum height of structures d. Number of Units: I bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms, 4 bedrooms Total units e. Gross density (DU/total acres) f. Net density (OU/total acres minus any dedication), g. Estimated protect population h. Estimated sale or rental price range 1. Square footage of structure t. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 1. Percent of site in road and paved surface 3. Complete this section if protect is commercial or industrial or mixed YSg• . a. Type(s) of land use b. Floor area Height of structure(s) c. Type of construction used in the structure d. Describe aaior ucess points to the structures and the orientation to adtoining properties and streets e. Number of on-site parking spaces proplded f. Estimated number of employees per shift Number of shifts Total g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate h. Estimated number of deliveries per day IiPS 44S4P _7_ 1. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate ~. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings k. Hours of operation 1. Type of exterior lighting 4. If pro,)ect is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project group Home b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures ~nA~ G ~ d. Height of structure(s) - maximum 20'9" e. Ultimate occupancy load of project 12 clients f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 25 g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces 4000 sg Ft h. Additional protect characteristics 7ko Mobile Homes to be used as class roans 1500 Sq FT. Facility to used as residential recovery home. Maxinnun occupancy would be 12 clients and 3 staff members. C. PR0IFGT CHA CT RISTICS 1. If the pro,)ect could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. N/A 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? b. How many cubit yards of fill will be placed? c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? d. Hhat will be the - Maximum depth of cut Average depth of cut Maximum depth of fill Average depth of fill WPC 9459P _g_ 3. dill there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or ad~~cent land uses? No 4. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed protect and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) Air Conditioning. Central Heatinc 5. Indicate the amount of natural (sq. ft. or acres) a,ooc eFtspace that is part of the project 6. If the protect will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these fobs. _ Three Positions, (Proiect Mans er, Resident Manager and Night Manager) 7. Ni11 highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within the project site? No 8. How many estimated automobile trips, the project? 5 fc fay, will .be generated by 9. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the . project, and their points of access or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the. following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric. and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. None D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. 2. Has a geology study been conducted on the propertyt _ays (If yes, please attach) N/A Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? (If yes, please attach) Hvdroloav Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? x'10 (If yes, please explain in detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? b. Are there any watercourses or drainage Improvements on or adjacent to the site? c. Ooes runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake. reservoir or bay? d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to ad,~acent areas? e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. 3. Noise a. Are there any noise sorces in the project vicinity which may impact the-project siteT _ w, 4. Bioloov a. Is the protect site in a natural or partially natural state? No b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property? Yes No (Please attach a copy). c. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location, height, diameter, and spec~e~ of trees, and which. (if any) will be removed by the pro,~ect. 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the pro,~ect site? NO b. Are there any known paleontological resources? NO c. Have Lhere been any hazardous aaterials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? No d. Mhat was the land previously used for? Fscistina Building on site PrPVinucly ncatl fnr Grnuo Haifa 'WPC 9459P -IO- 6. ~. 8. Current Land Use a. Mscribe all structures and land uses currently existing on the pr0~ect site. Residential Structure and tiv trailers b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. North Vacant Land SOUth Besid~r~al Area East .vaunt Land - Mest RP..i dential Area Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) No b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so, how many and what type?) Thr~, Program Mana /Resident Manager/Night Manager Please provide any other information which may assist 1n the evaluation of the proposed pro,~ect. The MAAC Proiect will be establishing a 12 bed Culturally Specific WPC 9459P Men's Recovery Hone, The program will provide a social model recovery program for mPn with alcohol related problems. All residents are vol~±ntar;ty Pnrolto~t -nd are_emploved or will be_ trained for employement in the canm~nity. -11- E. CERTIFICATION I, or Owner/owner in escrow* I, _ ROGQt C~?nuFc - x'"e`'" i trey or Or Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my herein contained are in all respects Information concerning the project and application for an Initial Study of enclosures for attachments thereto. belief, the statements and information true and correct and that all known its setting has been included in this possible environmental impact and any DATE: July 31, 1991 `If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. MPC 9459P ~ _~~_ TBE C17Y OF CHULd T?STA P'lRTYDISCI.OSURE ST.lTEMEiVT Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign tontnbutions, oa all matters which wr71 require discretionary action on the part of the City Cotmca7, Plarming Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a subcontractor, material supplier. MAAC Project 2. If atry person identified pursuant to individuals owning more than 10%'0 interest in the partnership. 3. 4. 5. 6. financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organiratioa or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organiration or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. Have you had more than 5250 worth of business transacted with any member of the Ciry staff; Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No ~ If yes, please indicate person(s): Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Maritsa aeries Roger Caldwell Victor Lopez Warren Garcia-Stewart Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than 51,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No x If yes, state which Councilmember(s): cno is defined as: •Atryindividual, fitnr, co-pnnncrship, joinr vcnuve, nrtocimion, totltNdup,rjnlpna(p~aNmlion, corporation, crane, tnrtt, rceeirer, ryndicatq thin and arty otho couu?V, cip~ mrd count,); tip; nuuricipn/ip; distriu or ahcp0/iticn/ subdirisiun, or nap pekes group or conrbinnrion naing nt n unit.' (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) Date: July 31 1991 Signature contractor/applicant ROGER CAZARES, Executive Director Print or tape name of contractor/applicant l•t• r r ~.~D1sCLOSL•.T"t) 1RwsN: 1 l::tU.'lpl MAAC PROJECT ROGER CAZARES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERNESTO AZHOCAR -CHAIRPERSON MANUEL R. CAMACHO -VICE CHAIRPERSON DOLORES ADAME -SECRETARY 'EDWARD NICHOLAS -TREASURER 1) Anthony Yenegea 6) Eduard Nicholas Stadium Technician Nigh School Coach 90 E. Neplea 2312 •p" Ave. Chula Viata, CA 9?010 National city, 9?O50 283-5503 (work) 177-5726 (home) 691-1219 (home) 1/81 6/77 2) Ernesto Ashocar 7) Victor Reasndsr zNPACT Director Principal, Penn Elem. 1615 Lanoitm Ave 393? Palm Drive . National City, CA 91950 Bonita, CA 9200? 267-1711 (home) 575-596? (work) !/7! 172-1005 (home) 6/78 3) Dolores Adame 8) Juan Rodriquer Community Activist Nursery Worker 250 E. Park Avenue 2112 Pzimoei, Apt. S San Ysidro, CA 9?073 Viata, CA 92083 128-1618 (home) 598-9863 (home) 7/8? 727-219? (work) !) Delfin Labao 7/87 . . Retired 9) Annie Arroyo 1901 Gamma Street TaY Compliance Offl Clr National City, CA 9?050 . Employment Develop. Dept. ?6?-?197 (Rome) 3?7 N. 9obier Drive B/7! Viata, CA 92083 165-3958 (hams) S) Ranusl R. Camacho 717-2?03 (work) 2/89 Tsetro Musical Dizsctor 3717 Msade Avsnus San Disgo, CA 92I16 281-826? (home) !7l-678! (rork) 6/76 CITY DATA f. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Case No. /S- 9~- oS I. Current Zoning on site: ~ 3 North ~p2o South T -~ East ~ West K 1 Does the project conform to the current zoning? y!~-~~~~ -~ ~ C!~== 2. General Plan land use designation on site: O-v,. ?_ ^r.~s.. North L;. { tr South ;; East •~_ West +. Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? YP=. Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ~~- (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route.) 3. Schools If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Permanent Temporary School Attendance Capacity Elementary Jr. High Sr. High 4. Remarks: rJlp: Students Current Generated Caoac;ty From Pro.iect l ti(A l t/ /I,u,IA C • ~2t1 LLEk Directo of Planning or Representative WPC 9459P -13- '~. 2S -~~l Date 6. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Drainage Ys-4~r4 lase No. r5-ga-v5 a. Is the project site within a flood plain? f~b- If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary b. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? S~,a.~eis F4ow re SE up ay~ ~F c. Are they adequate to serve the pro ect? ~A If not, explain briefly. o~.tc.r •.~ ~~, ,,,~ d. What 1s the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities?~RFac-c ~,~,vcw , Ec gv ~~,,,~ koa,-„k TL//ER . e. Are they adequate to serve the project? ~'~. If not, explain briefly. 2. Transoortation a. What roads provide primary access to the protect? /~to2rH ..gun skVFaL I6 b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day ? l2 Bsns x~/rte= 240 -re,c~, ~S 'Apt rJoT EkC.~E9 x~ST~1J O Er G1~ ySJ` c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after project completion? Before After A.D.T. 4R3A 'Solo L.O.S. C. __ If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly. d. Are there any intersections at or near the point that will result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)? No. If so, identify: Location Cumulative L.0.5. WPC 9459P -14- Ys-~4~q. e. Is there any dedication required? If so, please specify.~~ sa~N Case No. r5_R2-C~ uarBr~O~E.e o~ ~EntG4nad zr -Tor-~ (~ ~GPr 8E ~u~¢CD TD ME~'r 7iFE ~A~R-v5 of Sa~D LE !G f. Is there any street widening required? 1Jo. If so, please specify. g. Are there any other street lnprovements required? YES If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary tnprovements. ~~~r L,rE+r ~t 2 ~ui~o 3. ;!oils a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? U-JK~rowaf b. If yes, specify these conditions. ~a c. Is a soils report necessary? Ffo• 4. land Form a. What is the average natural slope of the site? Srrg is C ~-~-,-~ b. Mhat is the naximum natural slope of the site? ~~ ~s -~ 5. Noise Are there any traffic-related noise levels fepacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? ~lv. 6. Taste Generation Dt~ NoT Ex~~ F~cts~r,.SG USE How Bauch solid and liquid (sewage) waste will •be generated by the proposed protect per day? . Solid N~A liauid h!/A Mhat is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site? N/iL Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? nl~a ' 0459P -15- Y~-~4~{ r Case No. S- 2-OS 7. Remarks Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts. mitigation measures or other Issues. .E'.~ Cit Engineer or Represents ve Da MPC 9459P -16- Case No. is - 9~-oS H. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? ~ what is the Fire Department's estimated reaction time? S m,,.,-~ / //h ,,,,, 'o 2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? y crs ~3. Remarks ~~~ ~ Fire Mar hal ~/ ~-/ ~ , Date WPC 9459P -17- CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Address_.3 Pc9n. 5~~~,n Plan Fi1~Nog'2'-V~hecker(:~T1g-Date ~2 q Type Constr. Occupancy No. Stories Bldg. Area The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions. PROVIDE AND SHOW ON PLAN: - - - - ~ ~ /'~ i.5~ ~ ,S ~-~.~ c ~ , ~u C Lk~ a ~ e~ J'n~ BeL '7 .4IC.t~2?,S. ~~s ~- C~ V c~2_c w ~ ,S ~ /-l- L L. ,~{ [S T LA Xi/ Lj y ~v° .~ FPB-29 ~t~U S~ !ri .US A~ iD n .~ ~4 TL' bl cfS Case No. is- 9~- os H-1. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I. How many acres of parkland are necessary to serve the proposed project? 2. How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan? (If applicable) 3. What are the current park acreage requirements in the Park Service District? (If applicable) 4. Is project subject to Parks 3 Recreation Threshold requirements? If not, please explain. 5. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? Neighborhood Community Parks 6. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase? Neighborhood Community Parks 7. Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds established by City Council policies? 8. To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to: Provide land? Pay a fee? 9. Remarks: (.l0 1?iLQtlf~~t~-r.s'S opt C~,~ht~w~"S ,~ Ste' Parks and Recreation Director or Representative Date WPC 9459P -Ig- ~~ `-i ~ i ~i ~i ~t ~i ~i ~ i I~ I I I I I I i I .. ~ E Y ~~3 ~ cE 8~N:~~~ E N~ • E ~: E«8s t"•3E EY ~• ~ Y Y FE ~i: OM1 •ONL ~ ~ ~: _ _~~ ~: S: ~ • N r • 1L If~ E !~ p_~~ s ~ ~~ ~ .~ y O O pOMY O~ L cti ~~ ~~Y•~ Ya i w/ YY OL• ~ ~E± rM~ OY _ MN=~ r If_ ~ N CO }•}~ YYY M_i .g II'u .. ~rE N~^ Z ML G ter" ~ YL NE• ~~ s ;, Y e: ~e» ~c t ~ i i ~ t i a u ~ i e Y N A ~~ .. ~Y ~ ~O YS ~~ ~~ Y M C~ e !aO M Z a ~ E I~ I I I I y /~ • N M~ O.Y. ~ V' ~ ~~ p ° S C$ V~ '~ ~ M MM ~~ C O = O Y iiii ~ti Y wQ 0~ L Mr ~• ^ 1! 4 ~ S Y ~ + e N ` ~ ~ ~~ .g S ~C°C r ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~^ Y O~ N O i • M~C s~~ _~ S Sit C ~~' 03YM YM ~~O O~ o•i ~ ~ w ~ ~ 0 Y O y~er A ~ b ~ `~ .~ :; N P N a a I I i I I I I I I »^ g" ~ ^ Y • r ~~~~ . 3 ° ~'~ L =N ~' ~ '==^ N ~~?~M $vg ~jY ems- L '~ e E « ~ ,; ~~ .t Y«. ~~eE~ v ~ ri ~i I ~ 3~se s t ~ r 6Y g r ~ ~.: ~ ~«~~ ~`&~ ~~ ~~ a ~4 ~: ~°~ 3 '~ ~ggg£_e ~E ~"~!~ ~~ O .~Y M i O d ~ ~ i~ e•« N ~ e^•, ~" ~ ~es '~ Y `B O ~~ i~ M y`J N L ^ Y~di i1t, §S ~.30 a u ~~ I Y O ~~ e ~a ~~~~ .: «~ a R~•~ • O O M a €s~ :~:: L~~: O ~ ~ •~ g N C ~ ~ " S $! ~ i 3 ~ =s Y N ~ Y N~N Sj ~ s ~ ~~ ~~`e ~w~ ~ .~ ~~ ^ia • ~ M ~ ~^ ~ t ~^ a. ?~ = ~ s ~ »~ v ~ o ~s ~~o '^ ~ e I I I I I I ~O s~ :Cw ~v _•~ g• ~~S N «. «1 r» Y N1V • ~ • s • ~ •~ ° ~~ r t ~~^ ~YN ~ ~N E ~/~ ~ N i^ a x~~~ • M gg .,«. ~s3 E~3 ~ ~g~: ~ S#a ~ Y 5 ~ rgg L g _ ~ s_: t r = O O Y fS P M a N M n ~. a J 1 I' I I I I I I I I I \I g ~» ~~r € ~ g ~gIE ~ t~ gs r $~ ~y ~ sO ~~~ L ~ ~ + ~ 'g~ pOy. ~wy ~^ ~ e y w Y 1 81'Y S «K ~`ye .. $ y OS Y ~ C iC~~ ~~ Sw R: ~~~'S E ~' ~ ~ :g ~ ~ .~ SgEr sg «Y .u «~ ~~ L ~ e'ES «N~Y ~L ~ ~Y~`i g E { ~~~~. ~ ~» i ~r ~$g~ i a u v i ~r i a ~ Y .~. .r.•. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S .S:F SS E° Y: ~ ~ ~g g «a i = ; =3~~6 ~g s~= 'g _ t ~ E _ $ a. s ~ ~~a"_ ~ www a Se g ~~teg~ ~ PO « f . w ~ ~~~ 3i ~ wp' ~ Y r M M~ « ~~ ~« ~ ~«~e~ ~f '~~ "gg g' ~g ~a sg~ » : L s iiE ~~^w >,t~ 'L~ ~~M V ~L : AY CMeBw +e Syy~ ypp 000 tO ~ riCV~ ~L~ 0 '~i ~N :~ «~ ~ AFL s c E `~ Y- ~i gti°3 ~„ ~~ ~ <5~~. PIt ~S~ x,88 ~ ~~ W~ <Y5 ~w +~ w• ww~ ggg • n ~ w . w^i a N A Y~ i i ~3• 5 t .: ~s ..a~ ~~_°: ~~^~~3~° 'g~~ +i w ~e%~^ ~g~'~g ~« S _ 3s.•t~E•~~~YQQ..- • ~ r ~, £~~ ~y 8C C+iY i~e~^£~Yp'c «~i»~«i3tii~$ i N ~I I I f; ~« €g'~ i~ ""t« r~ ``~';~ • p N Y ~~'aP~ . X~Yu~' «a ~ pf3 €` ~1 I I 'E~~~u.: e~ iww ~^~~ •~ wr~~~~ ~w~g Y~~eY•:S ~=.Y !~; •tCPS ~f` 'e Y O I I I I I I I I 3Y « •~S~ C• '~~ «" uTi ~ psi ~i a~"-; t% -s'= - ~~ ."°s ~ °f ~~ i s i~SLe ~5i a i~ a ai v .°. w .~ s M a x N III. Determination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.......[ ] I find that although the proposed protect could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the protect. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WIII BE PREPARED ...................................................[ ] I find the proposed protect MAY have a significant- effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required........[ ] ~ ~ 991 Da IV. SUMMARY OF ISSUES V ual,u /,wa C' • Vk,t tl~~ Signaturle For G; List all significant or potentially significant impacts identified in the Initial Study checklist form. YES MAYBE W a,~E ~_ NPC 9459P -28- M. DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION (Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AB 3158) ~. It is hereby found that this protect involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources and that a 'Certificate of Fee Exemption" shall be prepared for this project. It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife, individually or cumulatively and therefore fees in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. IY`^~LfA ~I AA,(A ~y~AAJ./D /i ~ , /. Z- ~ I Environm ntal Review Coordinator Date WPC 9459P _pg_ COMMENT LETTERS Kampgrounds Enterprises, Inc. Fr4nchiueofX4mppounds ofAmerica, /nc. 111 NORTH SECOND AVENUE CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 9201 O TEIE PHONE 1619) 427-3601 ~ ~ c~ c ~ ~~~~I J~ AUG 2 6 1991 I 3, is,~J Mr. Douglas D. Reid August 26, 1991 Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista PO Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Ceae # IS-92-OS Deer Mr. Reid: Thia letter addresses some concerns that we have here at San Diego KOA and also concerns expressed by Harriet Acton of 265 Nixon PL, Chula Vista, who requested that we write on her behalf since she is out of town et this time. Our primary concern is centered around the fact that MAAC is proposing to lease only a small portion of the total facility. Thia raises a number of issues. What, if any, compatible uses will be found for the rest of the facility? While the MAAC proposal ea presented doesn't sound too bad, who will be willing to take over the rest of the facility? Currently, it seems to be used for transient housing. We ere very concerned that without a single tenant for the facility or without a proposal that presents the multiple tenants at one time, there will be a great deal of pressure on the city to accept far less desirable uses for the rest of the facility. Who will be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of the grounds and exterior of the buildings, shared facilities such as irrigation systems and fire alarms? Mra. Acton reports that there have been numerous false alarms for fire and each time several units respond creating a disturbance for the neighborhood and a cost for the city. We have experienced flooding problems brought on by faulty irrigation systems. With multiple tenants we are concerned about accountability for correcting these defects. Another concern we have is that we already hove an alcohol rehab facility in our neighborhood (South Bay Pioneers>. Do we need another? We fear that we will soon be viewed as a convenient repository for locating social rehabilitation services. This could have a very negative impact on the stability of our neighborhood. The proposal by MAAC is for a group home for "Latino Men". Our neighborhood is culturally and ethnically diverse. Will the installation of an ethnic specific operation create en imbalance? A facility of only twelve persona plus staff probably would not. However, once there, the moat likely tenant for the rest of the facility will also be a MAAC sponsored program. Will it too be allowed to be cultural or ethnic specific? If ao, we think this will have an impact on the neighborhood. We are aware of other proposed uses for the project site which would both lease the entire facility and invite residents regardless of their ethnic backgrounds. We think that the proposal merits more study and that en EIR should be prepared et least on a limited basis to assess the potential impacts to the neighborhood. Sin er y, Pres. San Diego KOA Harriet Acton, 265 Nixon PL, C.V. RECEIVED ACT 1 ~ 19~~. P~ANNIN~~ TO: CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL RE: NOSOTROS ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOME I am writing to endorse MAAC Project's application to provide alcohol recovery services at Nosotros. MAAC Project has been involved in alcohol and drug related services for almost two decades.. In addition to providing Drinking Driving Services in San Diego County since the law was implemented in 1978, MAAC has administered a highly successful recovery program for women since 1986 (Casa de Milagros). This agency has consistently demonstrated its ability to be sensitive to the needs of its clients as well as the community. MAAC Project has a proven track record of effectively integrating services such as job placement, housing, and training services which would also be available to residents of Nosotros. I would strongly urge you to approve the application of the MAAC Project as it has clearly demonstrated a unique ability to provide meaningful services to a population that all too often does not receive the kind of attention that is required. Sincerely,cSE~L(42~ Q~ Nancy H~hcock, Chairman South Bay Directors Council 1 j ~,.J- ~.I -..ri C ~7 T~ Cv~G~ ,~ v i~ /~ .~ T Cv .~ C,E/'~vs ~~ ,van-~ i /~%_ ~= iJ jr/i s i hJ ~ ~ /?~~ ~ ~3c~~iyvu,~j _ F~ Ti~`l=/~? n-cnn~ f T S~r~~c ~- /~S /i` fi ci ~- C . S' 'c.l~ C~ ~T/~` ,C ~ ,~ Tivi c G~/c~o~~~%'i~t~,~ Sim ~c.,~rZ ~~~/3~~ ,~--r _ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ irv ~ T ~~i~ C~c~/~ ~/ is T~ ~~.2Ci ~ ~ 3 s_ RECEIVED AUG ~ 6 199! PLANNIfJG RECEIVED ;,, AUG 2 6 191 PLANNING a,~~ ~ _ Y~ _~~ . ~ ~-~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~-~,©~-~~~~ are ~% ~~~ ~.~~ ~ . ~~ ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~~ --o~~ ~ a G~ize.~~ ~, ~a~ . / ~ (/) C,~~'C~tfk~%, /F/ (.PLC ~~ .~-d~ GI.C~G<~L4G-/ ~~~,i~" Q ~ e~~ ~~ ~' ~ ~~~~rnL~~~ - ~~~ ~ti~~ ~r~~ ~zt~.c-e> , ~~ o~~ /~s--c~-ems ~~G~ ~ a i ~~~~ J ~~~~ ., i2~~-~e~ iC~~~~~ ,ate ~~~ d~ ~~ ~~ ~, ~ ~.~;C ~K V k•t~(.'1-Cfwh~l •'Jh_.~,L ~,t~Lf.tt~ C..t1C~~j7Ct~6t! Q6' a .~aLe~z.i- ~ ~1 o:~auxe '~,!~Qrc.~c-tr,, ~ ~lY.v~ C/)Cl~v!!c /rlFrh cv<:[~ i. V ~~; L~,U-CtS _. ~ ti ~ <.C-~ . c`r L./ CGCI~C 3Cf ~ UC.) ~ J ~~ ~.. i ``Y']Ect-C ~ fie, nb-t.~c~,C-~~7€,' ~~u:<.(c:E' `,~.. ci,~" (~'fzt~ ;'j~cE~c~ ~ G~,G ~~jQV2<"encc[~=' 2 ~QQ ~'ZGYY. ~j~Z Q~ ..~32~AwC' ' ,RiX/> , cc~ t~,to , ,~~,~~,~,~,~,~ , ,~,~, o J~~lto ~"nCr,~~~~C,_ fzvQ~' -~c,~E~..cc~ rf,~-. JJ3t,C:LCCt.QL"/ CL( C.. (U.l/zy~y" ~ L~•'=~6~Yiu~ . „~ f~ ~'~w_,cd~ ~.i-, ~ ~.(woa!' Q/riyw~, l~l• O,,~J . RECEIVED AUG z ~ ~y~,~, August 23, 1991 PLANNING .' Environmental Review Coordinator P. 0. Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 92012 Dear Sir: In response to IS being conducted on location at 3 North Second Avenue, I am objecting to the idea of moving in two mobile homes for classes for facilities for Latino men. In my estimation, this will be more clutter on the property, more people, more cars and traffic coming and going, and this facility will be in addition to whatever is going to be placedd in thethe 62-bed facility. I feel this is absolutely too much activity. Z own and have lived at 44 North Second Avenue for the past thirty years. My place is the old Victorian Orchard home across the street and in direct view of 3 N. 2nd. Please consider the quiet ambience of our neighborhood and our desire to maintain as much as possible the peacefulness that now exists. Very truly ~~ ~~~ ~~ f"~rs'. Joan 42.2-8894 yours, ,'1:N~ M.' Jones i Jr`~N Mich Sci Sweetwater Union High School District r o ADMINISTRATION CENTER ~ 1130 Fifth Avenue y Chula Vista, Celifornla 91911-2896 ~"M5 ~ 1,`~Y (619) 691-5500 Division of Planning and Facilities RECEIVE ~~ August 29, 1991 Mr. Douglas Reid City of Chula ~fista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula ~lista, CA 9191 1 Dear 1hr. Reid: Re. IS-92-05 - 3 North Second Avenue SEP - 5 1~4. , PLANNING The shove project will have an impact on the Sweetwater Union High School District. Payment of school fees will Ile required pursuant to Government Cade No. 65995 (Developer Fees) prior to issuance of building permit. Cordially, ~- T auras Silva Director of Planning TS/ml a BOARD OF EDUCATION JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D. LARRY CUNNINGHAM SHARON GILES PATRICK A. JUDD GREG R. SANDOVAL SUPERINTENDENT JDHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D. CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 619 425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH August 15, 1991 Ms. Maryann Miller Environmental Review Section City of Chula vista ' 9 1991 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: IS-92-05 / FA-542 / DP-N/A Location: 3 North Second Avenue Applicant: MAAC Project Project: "Nosotros° Culturally Specific Men's Recovery Home Dear Ms. Miller: This is to advise you that the project, located at 3 North Second Avenue, is within the Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from Kindergarten through Grade 6. District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 4 - 5 percent over the past several years, and this is projected to continue. Permanent capacity has been exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District also buses students outside their attendance areas, both to accommodate growth and assist in achieving ethnic balance. Currently a developer fee of $1.58 per square foot of assessable area ($ .70 for Chula Vista Elementary School District, $ .88 for Sweetwater Union High School District) is assessed for new residential construction and additions/remodels of over 500 square feet. Since developer fees currently allowed under State law provide approximately twenty-five percent of the facilities costs to house new students, the District encourages developer participation in alternative financing mechanisms to help assure that facilities will be available to serve children generated by new construction. We are currently utilizing Community Facilities Districts (CFD's) as one method to help fund this shortfall. Participation in a CFD is in lieu of developer fees, with school mitigation paid by the homeowner in the form of a special tax. Residential projects of 20 units or more west of the I-805, and all new development east of the I-805, are recommended for participation/annexation in a CFD. Other smaller projects are also given the opportunity to mitigate school impacts through annexation in lieu of fees. August 15, 1991 Ms. Maryann Miller Page 2 RE: IS-92-O5/"Nosotros" Culturally Specific Men's Recovery Home The subject project, "Nosotros" Culturally Specific Men's Recovery Home, is located in the Rosebank School attendance area. This school is presently operating over capacity, and a developer fee as described above is required to help mitigate school impacts. To fully mitigate impacts this project will have on elementary facilities, the project proponent is encouraged and has the option to request annexation to CFD No. 5 in lieu of fees. If you are interested in annexing to CFD No. 5, please let us know as soon as possible, and we will forward our annexation criteria to you. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, Kate Shurson Director of Planning KS:dp cc: Roger Cazares Maritza M. Garcia