Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1984/09/11 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Tuesday, September ll, 1984 Council Chamber 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Malcolm, McCandliss, Scott, Moore Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron, Assistant City Manager Asmus PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PPJ~YER The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES (None) 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY OATHS OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED TO NEWLY APPOINTED COMMISSIONERS The City Clerk administered the Oath of Office to Ollie Braden - Human Relations Commission and Suzanne Harris - Safety Commission. 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (None) PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF GPA-84-1 ~ APPROVING PROPOSAL BY THE SAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUB TO REDESIGNATE ABOUT 6.00 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED IN THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF NAPLES STREET, WESTERLY OF CORTE MARIA AVENUE, FROM PARKS AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON THE GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM (Director of Planning) a. RESOLUTION 11757 APPROVING THE PROPOSAL BY THE SAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUB TO REDESIGNATE ABOUT 6.00 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE NORTHERLY SIDE OF NAPLES STREET, WESTERLY OF CORTE MARIA AVENUE, FROM "PARKS AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE" TO "MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL" ON THE GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM Council Meeting - 2 - September ll, 1984 This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearings on Items 4 and 5 since then are related. Councilman Malcolm stated he is abstaining from both public hearings due to a potential conflict of interest (member of the San Diego Country Club) and left the dais at this time. Director of Planning Krempl submitted plats explaining that the San Diego Country Club proposes the allocation of six acres of its 150-acre site to medium density residential use. Two of the involved six acres of land are within the City of Chula Vista although most of the site lies within the unincorporated territory of San Diego County. The subject site is designated "Parks and Public Open Space" by the Chula Vista General Plan. The subarea within the City of Chula Vista is zoned "R-I", and the subarea within the County is zoned S-90-20 (Urban Holding Zone). The site is presently a part of the Country Club's landscaped open space, but is not a part of its golf course. The EIR-84-7 concludes this project will not result in any significant environmental impacts. Staff recommends concurrence with the recommendation of the City Planning Commission and adoption of the Resolution which certifies that the EIR-84-7 has been prepared in compliance with California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Procedures of the City and that the Council is considering this information in this document as it reaches a decision on the project. Mr. Tim Cox, project manager for RVR and Associates, stated his firm has prepared the environmental impact report. Mr. Cox added that public and staff comments have been included in the report and summarized the impacts on soils, drainage, air quality, noise, land use and space and the aesthetics noting also the mitigation measures taken on each of these items. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned the semantics of the language in the EIR whereby it referred to the golf course as "permanent open space". Director of Planning Krempl stated the designation as open space was not correct. The site is privately owned and can be used for development. The term "permanent open space" is inappropriate. Director of Planning Krempl then submitted additional plats noting the proposed site, the adjacent land uses and zoning. He explained the developer is proposing to put in 80 condominium units. Staff feels the density is harmonious with certain conditions and concludes that the median density from 4-12 units per acre is consistent with the area and appropriate as filed. 5. PUBLIC HEARING PCZ-84-C CONSIDERATION TO REZONE AND PREZONE 6.0 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NAPLES STREET AND OPPOSITE DIXON DRIVE FROM R-1 AND S-90 (COUNTY) TO Ro3 P-14 SAN DIEGO COUNTRY CLUB (Director of Planning) Council Meeting - 3 - September ll, 1984 a. ORDINANCE 2082 AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING AND PREZONING 6.0 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NAPLES STREET AND OPPOSITE DIXON DRIVE FROM R-1 AND S-90 (COUNTY) TO R-3 P-14 - FIRST READING Director of Planning Krempl explained that the applicant is requesting that a total of 6.0 acres of property located on the north side of Naples Street opposite Dixon Drive (southeast corner of the San Diego Country Club) be rezoned (approximately 2 acres) from R-1 (Single Family Residential) prezoned (approximately 4 acres) from S-90 (County Holding Zone) to R-3-P-14 (Multiple Family Residential subject to a precise plan at a density of 14 units per net acre). Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission recommendation to approve the rezoning and prezoning in accordance with their Resolution PCZ-84-C. Mr. Krempl added the attachment of the "P" modifying district will permit the establishment of development standards which would restrict height and location of residential structures to minimize the impact of development on adjacent R-1 properties to the east. Plats were then shown noting the topography of the area, the proposed structures and height elevations, the trees and preservation of such on the northeastern border of the property, the eight homes that would be affected by the site distance and the ingress and egress into the property. Council discussion followed with the Planning Director noting the setback areas: the zoning wall that would be a condition; the proposed 200 parking spaces; the recreational area and putting greens in the proposed development. In summary Mr. Krempl stated that based on the condition and the precise plan review the density range as medium density on the general plan amendment have led the Planning Commission to recommend approval. Speaking for the proposal was Anthony Ambrose, 4877 Viewridge, San Diego, whose firm prepared the plans for the project. He agreed with the Planning Commission approval and recon~nendation stating the 6.0 acre site has been used for refuse for the last 30 years; it will provide additional security for the premises; it will be housing for retirees; it will be a positive impact on the existing shopping center; it will improve the Naples Street frontage; the only access will be from Naples which will have very little impact on the adjacent areas; there will be view corridors; the units will be a minimum of 1,000 sq. ft. to 1,400 sq. ft and all 2 bedrooms with clay tile roofs. Speaking against the proposal was Richard Nielsen, 1032 Corte Maria, Betty Nielsen, 1032 Corte Maria, Maldra Sandroff, 1020 Corte Maria and Donald Thompson, 1052 Corte Maria, Chula Vista. Council Meeting - 4 - September ll, 1984 In summary their comments were: (1) The residents feel they have been short changed on public hearings on this project. (2) Initially 120 units were proposed as low and moderate income housing for those people earning 524,000 annually or less. (3) 30-40% of the condo owners will be retirees from Club members. (4) The proposal is for the Club to get the rezoning and then sell it to a developer. (5) If this goes through, the shopping center property will obtain a higher value and they may want to sell and redevelop. (6) The Council should consider the economic and social values asking that no decision be made until the people have had an adequate chance to express their concerns. (7) Moved to this area from Santa Monica and lived in several places, h moving out because of multi-family developments in t e neighborhood. (8) Consider the traffic impact, there will be at least 160 cars going in and out of this project. Consider the noise factor and the smell of the automobiles, starting and stopping which will have a devastating effect on the health of the residents. (9) The San Diego Country Club has allocated $100,000 to "shove this plan through the Planning Commission and City Council". (10) It's incompatible to the rest of the neighborhood. (11) The San Diego Country Club wants the money from this project in order to build a new clubhouse. 12) The Country Club does not have Chula Vista's interest at heart because they have never annexed to the City. (13) The condos will have special areas for golf course carts; therefore it is not "low and moderate income housing". (14) These will be the first apartments built in this area. (15) The trees on the northeastern border are intended to be a corridor. (16) The area has not been used for dumping, only that particular section next to the shopping center. Council Meeting - 5 - September ll, 1984 Speaking for the proposal was Bob Campbell, 43 Corte Maria, Chula Vista representing the San Diego Country Club. He stated that out of 96% of the members of the Country Club, 65% were in favor of building a new club house. This can only be built by money obtained by selling this property and assessing each member accordingly. Mr. Campbell stated the Manager of the club house is in receipt of a number of requests from members of the Club who are interested in buying a condominium at this location and asked the Council not to defer a decision on this and approve the project. In answer to Councilman Moore's question, Mr. Campbell responded that in order to obtain a high quality project, it is the intention of the Country Club to take the plans through the tentative process whereby they can exert control over much of the project as opposed to just marketing the property outright. Mr. Campbell added the term "low and moderate income" is really based on how one looks at the project. The condominiums will be selling somewhere from I98,000 and $140,000 per unit and whether or not the Country Club offers membership to those people buying the condominiums is something being discussed; however, no decision has been made. There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. Council continued its discussion with staff regarding retaining the grove of trees on the northeastern border of the property; the issue of the San Diego Country Club wanting a new Club House is of no consideration in the public hearings this evening; the project should be monitored carefully in mitigating any impacts on the single family homes; the front side of the condominiums will be facing the homes on Corte Maria Avenue; therefore, the residents will have a better view than the back of the condos; it will be a high quality development with the Country Club retaining control until a certain level in the process; the Council does have the Precise Plan control; the actual design of the project should be brought to the Council for review and approval; the term "low-and-moderate income" is meaningless - it will not meet that criteria; feel the plan can be attractively designed based on the conditions being imposed and concern for retaining as many trees on the premises as possible. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Malcolm abstaining. It was moved by Councilwoman McCandliss to incorporate in the ordinance the condition that the stand of the mature trees on the northeast corner of the acreage be preserved in its entirety. The motion died for lack of second. Council discussion ensued regarding the merits of saving all of the mature trees noting the older trees tend to become brittle and may be dangerous and suggested they be replaced with either younger eucalyptus trees or another species of trees. Council Meeting - 6 - September ll, 1984 Council discussed Condition No. 5 which states: "Removal of existing trees from site shall be evaluated by the City's Landscape Architect for replacement with specimen sized material in accordance with the approved landscape plan. Said analysis shall include any trees removed after January l, 1983." MSUC (Cox/Scott) to change Condition No. 5 to read: "Removal of existing trees from the site shall be approved by the City's Landscape Architect for replacement with specimen sized material in accordance with the approved landscape plan. All efforts shall be made to retain existing trees. Any trees removed after January l, 1983 shall be replaced with specimen sized material in accordance with the approved landscape plans." MSUC (Scott/Moore) to place the ordinance as amended on its first reading, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent with Councilman Malcolm abstaining. MSUC (Scott/Moore) that this item be automatically appealed to the City Council (the landscape and site plans). MSUC (Moore/McCandliss) that the detailed landscape plans of that area between the residents to the east and the proposed structures to the west, be coordinated with the property owners both east and west and the staff. Councilman Malcolm returned to the dais at this time. 6. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF GPA-84-5 - PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE LAND-USE ELEMENT OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF OTAY VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (Director of Planning) a. RESOLUTION 11758 AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN PERTAINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Director of Planning Krempl referred to his written report explaining that while the text of the Land Use Element of the Chula Vista General Plan clearly calls for the light industrial development of the Otay Valley Road area, it is brief and silent with respect to the City's complex process for the promotion and guidance of such development as well as the protection of the environmental quality of adjacent residential areas. The proposed amendment would strengthen the General Plan's statement on the Otay Valley Road area and would provide pertinent developmental, conservation and plan processing guidance. Council Meeting - 7 - September ll, 1984 Staff recommends concurrence with the recommendation of the City Planning Commission for adoption of the resolution and the Negative Declaration IS-85-2. Speaking in opposition was Henry Kohler, 1547-222 Sonora Drive, Chula Vista. Mr. Kohler stated he was representing the California Homeowner's Council which has over 1,O00 homeowners within a one mile radius of the area under consideration. Mr. Kohler stated their concern is to see the Otay Valley Road area upgraded with good architectural design with uses that will not create any water, ground or air pollution. There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 7. PUBLIC HEARING PCZ-85-A - CONSIDERATION TO REZONE 4.07 ACRES OF SDG&E PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF I-5 FREEWAY AND NORTH OF WALNUT AVENUE FROM R-3 TO I-L GARDNER/GRETLER (Director of Planning) a. ORDINANCE 2083 AMENDING ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING 4.07 ACRES OF SDG&E PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF I-5 AND NORTH OF WALNUT AVENUE FROM R-3 TO I-L-P - FIRST READING This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Director of Planning Krempl submitted plats noting the area in question, and the adjacent land uses and zoning. He explained this item involves a request to rezone the westerly 4.07 acres of the SDG&E property located on the east side of Interstate 5 freeway and the northerly terminus of the llO0 block of Walnut Avenue from R-3 (Multiple Family Residential) to I-L (Limited Industrial). The fact that the property is owned by SDG&E would limit the types of industrial uses to those not involving permanent above ground structures. In this instance, the applicants intend to use the property as a recreational vehicle storage facility. Staff recommends concurrence with the Planning Commission recommendation for approval in accordance with their Resolution PCZ-85-A and the adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-85-3. Director Krempl noted the Planning Commission's approval was based on ll conditions - one involves the drainage plan which shall be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to or concurrent with the approval of the precise plan. Councilman Moore questioned this proposal's impact on the area to the north noting it is a rezoning from multiple family to an Council Meeting - 8 - September ll, 1984 Mr. John Gardner, 753 Rogan Road, said the area is going to be used for vehicle storage. The area to the north is buffered by a screen and there will be a chain-link fence installed. In answer to Councilman Moore's question, Mr. Gardner indicated it will be virtually impossible to monitor placing "long-term" recreational vehicles on the northern property as opposed to vehicles with short term usage. There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. Councilman Moore questioned whether a one year review condition can be put into the ordinance. Director of Planning Krempl explained that with the "P" modifier it must go through design review and staff can take into account the land uses on the other side of the wall. Staff can also contact the Mobilehome Association to make sure it is properly buffered and make this a condition of the precise plan approval. MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to place the ordinance on first reading. The reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent passed and approved unanimously. 8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (None) CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 9-12) Councilman Moore asked for No. 12 to be pulled from the Consent Calendar. 9. RESOLUTION 11759 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND PONDEROSA HOMES FOR PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF A SEWAGE LIFT STATION IN RANCHO ROBINHOOD III SUBDIVISION (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) Ponderosa Homes Inc., successors in interest to Robinhood Homes, Inc., the original developers of the Rancho Robinhood III Subdivision, requested the City agree to maintain and operate the subdivision's sewage lift station in perpetuity. The City has estimated an amount required to assure that sufficient funds will be available to cover the anticipated annual maintenance/operation expenses and has prepared an enabling agreement. In answer to Councilman Malcolm's question, City Engineer Lippitt stated 4-5 homes will be served; however, after development, it could be as much as 10-12 homes. The cost of the sewer lift station will be between $10,O00-il2,000. lO. RESOLUTION 11760 ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF THE PORTION OF "K" STREET WEST OF BAY BOULEVARD TO THE SAN DIEGO & ARIZONA EASTERN RAILWAY (CORONADO BRANCH) RIGHT OF WAY (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) Council Meeting - 9 - September ll, 1984 As part of the development of its property along the west side of Bay Boulevard south of "J" Street, Ratnet Development Company has submitted an application to the City to vacate the portion of "K" Street right-of-way lying between Bay Boulevard and the Coronado Branch, S.D.& A.E. Railway right-of-way. The vacation is necessary to accomplish the overall development of the property according to the developer. Community Development Director Desrocher submitted a plat of the "K" Street vacation for Council viewing. ll. RESOLUTION 11761 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND ROBINHOOD POINT HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION FOR THE DEDICATION OF PRIVATE STREETS TO PUBLIC STREETS (Continued from the meeting of September 4, 1984) (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) Councilman Scott stated he is abstaining due to a potential conflict of interest. At the meeting of September 4, Council directed staff to return with a revised agreement which would reflect Council's desires for specific conditions to be placed upon the Homeowners' Association prior to acceptance of the private cul-de-sacs as public streets. The fiscal impact would add costs to the City for the maintenance of the private streets. End of Consent Calendar. 12. REPORT REQUEST FOR CHANGE IN ORDINANCE REGARDING QUANITY OF LIVESTOCK (Director of Planning) At the City Council meeting of July 24, 1984, a written request was received 6 Avenue asking that the City amend Section by Mrs. Gale Moriarity of 1 72 Ocala 6.04.010B of the Municipal Code to allow "two ponies" to be substituted for a single horse, thus giving an individual the right to keep either one horse or two ponies on a 20,000 sq. ft. lot. Based upon the definition in the dictionary ( a pony is a small horse) and the ordinances in place in the other local jurisdictions, staff recommends no change in the Chula Vista zoning ordinance nor the animal regulations contained in the Municipal Code. Councilman Moore discussed keeping of one horse on a 20,000 sq. ft. lot and if Mrs. Moriarity's lot exceeds this square footage, she can conceivable have another animal on her lot. Councilman Moore asked that a letter be written to the applicant from the Director of Planning explaining she can apply to the City Council for a waiver of the ordinance if her lot is less than 20,000 sq. ft. City Attorney Harron noted the Code does not allow a waiver of the ordinance; however, a variance can be applied for. The Council concurred that the information in the staff report sent to Mrs. Moriarity explains "her rights". MSUC (Scott/Malcolm) to accept the report. Council Meeting lO - September ll, 1984 13. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. MSUC (Cox/Scott) for a Closed Session for a matter of personnel. b. City Manager Goss stated that the City Engineer has notified him that Bay Boulevard (between Palomar and "L") will be closed for two weeks because of street construction. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 14. REPORT REQUEST FROM ST. JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH FOR VARIANCE FROM CITY'S POLICY ON PUBLIC SERVICE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) Staff received a request from St. John's Episcopal Church for two directional signs at the corners of "H" Street and First Avenue and "L" Street and First Avenue. Staff has denied the request because it does not comply with the Council Policy regarding public service directional signs on public streets. Therefore, St. John's Episcopal Church is appealing this to the City Council. Staff recommended that Council: (1) Deny the request for a variance from City Policy No. 465-01, "Public Service Directional Signs on Public Streets". (2) Direct staff to increase the installation of maintenance charge on public service directional signs to reflect full cost recovery at today's charges. MS (Moore/Cox) to accept the report. Father Michael Carr, St. John's Episcopal Church, noted the size of the proposed sign and the coloring and that it would not be a traffic hazard. The signs are inexpensive because they are mass produced for the Church. The signs can be mounted on a pole and are oversized by 6" in height and width. Council discussion followed with the City Engineer regarding ille al signs in the right-of-way such as those proposed by McDonalds and Fuller tFord) which state "Drive Carefully' and other signs from other organizations in the City. The City Engineer explained the process of attempting to get these signs removed. The motion to accept the staff recommendation carried unanimously. MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) for the staff to report back on the illegal signs in the City, to notify the property owners on which the signs are located and to report back to the City Council if there is a problem and what is being done to rectify it. Councilman Malcolm noted a number of increased construction going on in the City which might mean hiring new personnel to keep up with these workloads. City Manager Goss stated he is sensitive to these projects and is monitoring the staff in all departments noting especially Traffic Engineering. Council Meeting - ll - September ~l, 1984 UNANIMOUS CONSENT ITEM 14-A.RESOLUTION 11762 SUPPORTING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAW TO ALLOW PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS WHICH HAVE BEEN FILED BUT NOT COMPLETED TO BE GRANDFATHERED SO THAT THEY MAY BE PROCESSED PRIOR TO SPHERE OF INFLUENCE STUDIES BEING COMPLETED (City Attorney) There are a number of proposed annexations in the City which have been filed or will be filed prior to December l, 1984;however, due to the heavy workload LAFCO has been unable to process the annexations expeditiously. Under this proposal the annexations that are filed before December l, 1984 would be processed under this existing law and the proposal is to have them grandfathered in if they have been filed but not completed prior to that date. RES~UTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) for the staff to communicate this Resolution to the League of California Cities and send a copy of the resolution to all of the cities in the County. 15. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox asked for a ratification of the appointments of Alex Pressutti for the Commission on Aging and Dana Sue Toogood for the Parking Place Commission. MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to ratify the appointments. b. Mayor Cox submitted a rendering of the Sister City plaque which has just been approved by the International Friendship Commission. He asked that the Council concur with this recommendation so staff can go ahead and order the four plates. MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to accept the report and the drawing. c. Mayor Cox submitted a brochure from the City of Denver, Colorado on Sister Cities. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to ask the International Friendship Commission to consider putting together some type of brochure on Sister Cities Chula Vista has with factual data which will be of interest to the citizens of Chula Vista and people who inquire about (the City's) Sister Cities. d. Mayor Cox announced the City Manager/City Council leadership team workshop will be held on October 24-26, 1984. Anyone desiring to attend should notify either the City Clerk or the Secretary to the Council. Council Meeting - 12 - September ll, 1984 16. COUNCIL COM~NTS a. Councilwoman McCandliss noted the Chula Vista Transit memo in the Council packet. MSUC (McCandliss/Malcolm) to set this as a Council agenda item for September 25. b. Councilwoman McCandliss discussed "creative funding" noting that the University of California Berkely received a grant of $180,000 as a line item for a "submersion tank with an abrupt entry device" - which turned out to be a swimming pool with a diving board. c. Councilman Moore noted the amounts of grass growing in the City, especially in the Twin Oaks area between "E" and "F" Streets. He asked that the City Manager look into these areas. d. Councilman Moore questioned the replacement of the Zoning Enforcement Officer. City Manager Goss stated a person has been appointed and is now training on the job. e. Councilman Moore asked whether the City ever joined the National League of Cities Login Services. City Manager Goss stated the City joined the Public Technology Services. Director of Management Services remarked that the services started in August and will be evaluated at the next budget session. f. Councilman Moore asked for an update on the Caltrans Statewide needs especially as it is being proposed for Route 125. City Engineer Lippitt stated he hasn't received a report as yet. Councilman Moore stated he will give him his copy. Council recessed at 9:53 p.m. to the Redevelopment Agency meeting. ADJOURN~NT at ll:15 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for September 18, 1984 at 3:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber. WPG:0479C PAG