Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1984/10/23 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, 7:00 p.m. October 23, 1984 ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Malcolm, McCandliss, Scott, Moore Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron Assistant City Manager Asmus PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR MEETINGS OF OCTOBER 15, 17 AND 18, 1984 Councilman Moore noted that the Director of Planning wished to change his comments on page 5 of the minutes of October 15 as it pertained to the ordinance on one-lot condominiums. The statement should read "In answer to Council's question, Director of Planning Krempl affirmed that this amendment would apply to new condominiums being built and conversions that comply with the condominium standards." The words "only" and "not" should be deleted. Councilman Scott stated the language in the minutes was correct; however, he would support the change. MSUC (Moore/McCandliss) to amend the minutes to delete the words "only" and "not". Councilman Moore referred to his motion on page 13 of the minutes: "for the Manager to review the Risk Management Program and come back with a report" this should be for a report on the expanded program. MSUC (Moore/Cox) to approve the minutes as amended. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY Introduction of Foreign Students (American Field Service) Doris Cox introduced the foreign students as a part of the American Field International Program. Certificates from the Mayor and pins were presented to each student. City Council Meeting 2 October 23, 1984 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (None) Mayor Cox announced he received a request from the applicant on item No, 5 to consider this prior to the public hearing on Number 4. It was the concurrence of the Council to move item No. 5 up on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 5. PUBLIC HEARING PCS - 84-12 - SEAVAJ_E VILLAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-12 WESTWIND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (Planning Director) a. RESOLUTION 11784 APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR SEAVALE VILLAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-12 This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Di rector of P1 arming Krempl explained that the applicant submitted the tentative subdivision map in order to develop a one-lot condominium project consisting of 33 units on 1.1 acres located at 24 Woodlawn Avenue in the R-3 zone. The proposed development consists of 33 units (7 one-bedroom units and 26 two-bedroom) i n a single three-story triangular structure on the westerly portion of the property. On March 15, 1984 the Design Review Committee approved the architecture and site plan subject to eight conditions. The Planning Commission recommended approval i n accordance with their Resolution PCS-84-12. Councilman Scott noted that the back of the complex faces the trolley line and questioned whether any consideration was given to beautifying the backside of the apartments to present a better view to people riding the trolley. Director of Planning Krempl stated they are looking into the entire right-of-way of the trolley station. There being no comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 4. A. CONSIDERATION FINAL EIR-84-6 - CHULA VISTA WOODS - GARDNER INVESTMENT PROPERTIES (Director of Planning RESOLUTION 11785 CERTIFYING FINAL EIR 84-6 - CHULA VISTA WOODS Mayor Cox stated that he will open the public hearings on Items 4 A,B,C and D since they are all related. City Council Meeting - 3 - October 23, 1984 Director of Planning Krempl reported a public hearing on the draft of this EIR was held on July 25, 1984 by the Plannin9 Commission. All of the comments received have been incorporated into the final EIR, alon9 with responses regarding each of the comments. It is the finding of this final Environmental Impact Report that all significant environmental impacts can be reduced to a level of insignificance, although mitigation to reduce biological impacts would require a redesign of the project. The staff report includes project description; impact analysi s: land use, geology/soils, draina9e, land form, biological resources, traffic circulation, noise; public services; sewers, fire protection, law enforcement, water supply and schools; alternative options and subsequent CEQA actions. The Director of Planning recommended certifying that the EIR 84-6 has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and that the City Council will consider the information in this document as it reaches a decision on the project. Director Krempl referred to his written report to the City Council in which he explained that the hearin9s would involve the financing processing, environmental impact report, the issue of the stub street, the issue of the private vs. the public street system and the grading and retention basis. Doug Reid, Environmental Coordinator reported the site was approved in 1978 for 54 dwelling units including 7 acres of open space which protected the steep slopes and canyon area. The current proposal has been reviewed for adequacy and found to have significant biological impacts. This restricts significantly the alternatives the Council can approve. Mr. Reid submitted a report which depicted alternative actions on Chula Vista Woods. The first option of the Council would be to certify the EIR and the other option would be to chan9e the significant biological impact finding in the EIR to insignficant and to certify the EIR. Mr, Bruce MacIntyre stated his firm prepared the Environmental Impact Report project. He stated there are two rare and endangered species: the San Diego Ambrosia and the Orcutt's Birds Beak. The applicant proposes to transplant these species; however, there is no guarantee they will survive. Councilman Malcolm declared these plants grow in abundance in Mexico and this is the northern end for these plants. He questioned why they were not listed on the Fish and Game list of endangered species. Mr. Harold Wier, Wier Biological Firm, 4855-B Ruffher, San Diego, 92105, stated the Fish and Game are quite slow in getting out their list of plants. He showed pictures of the two plants stating his recommendation would be to preserve the area where the plants occur without moving them, to secure it somewhat from construction activities and from the residents - perhaps even to fence the area. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Scott and Councilwoman McCandliss voting "no". City Council Meeting - 4 - October 23, 1984 B. PUBLIC HEAJ~ING GPA-84-4 - CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN TO REDESIGNATE AP~OXIMATELY 10 ACRES OF LAND, A~)UTTING UPON THE E~TERLY LINE OF GREG ROGERS PARK, FROM PARKS AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ON THE PLAN DIAGRAM OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN RESOLUTION 11786 APPROVING AN AMENIX4ENT TO THE PLAN DIAGRAM OF THE LAND USE ELE~NT OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN FOR THE REDESIGNATION OF APPROXIMATELY lO ACRES OF LAND ABUTTING UPON THE EA~STERLY LINE OF GREG ROGERS PARK Principal Planner Lee explained that the applicant proposes to develop a llO-dwelling unit, modular-home project on twenty acres of land. The proposed project called Chula Vista Woods would be partially accommodated on a certain 1D-acre parcel of land which adjoins Greg Rogers Park and which was formerly considered as a potential site for the expansion of the said park. The amendment would redesignate the site from Parks and Public Open Space to Medium Density Residential (4-12 dwelling units per gross acre}. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILht~N MOORE. Councilman Scott spoke against the motion stating the City is losing the opportunity of having open space and park land. The "H" modifying district was placed on this property some years ago and to do away with it now would not be appropriate. Councilman Malcolm indicated the Council is obligated to the owners to allow them to develop their land to the highest and best use adding that in the last 2-1/2 years he has been on the Council, there has never been a proposal by the City to purchase this land for park purposes. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Scott voting "no". C, PUBLIC HEARING PCZ-84-1 - CONSIDERATION TO REZONE 20 ACRES EAST OF GREG ROGERS PARK FROM R-1-H TO R-l-P-6 ORDIhU~NCE 2090 AMENDING ZONING ~U~P OR ~U~PS ESTABLISHED BY TITLE 19 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO CHA~IGE THE ZONING OF 20 ACRES LOCATED EAST OF GREG ROGERS PARK FROM R-1-H TO R-I-P-5.5 - FIRST READING Principal Planner Lee reported the applicant is requesting that 20 acres located immediately east of Greg Rogers park, 1300 feet south of East Naples Street and 400 feet west of Brandywine Avenue be rezoned from R-1-H (single family residential, 7000 sq. ft. minimum lot size with the Hillside Modifying District attached) to R~I-P-6 (single family residential at a density of 6 dwelling units per acre and subject to a precise plan). The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning in accordance with their Resolution PCZ-84-I IR.-l~P-5.5}. City Council Meeting - 5 - October 23, 1984 Council discussion centered on the developer's agreement whereby he would allow one sale per unit per buyer. Mr. Gardner stated that would be no problem, he would be happy to enter into this agreement. Councilwoman McCandliss noted the price breaks being given to the developer for this project and questioned whether there could be a firm commitment that the selling price would not exceed $90,000. Mr. Gardner answered that they cannot set the definite price until the final map is approved by the Council. MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to place the ordinance on first reading, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. D. PUBLIC HEARING PCS-84-13 CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION ~P FOR CHULA VISTA WOODS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 84-13 - STAFFORD-GARDNER DEVELOPMENT Director of Planning Krempl explained that the applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map i n order to subdivide approximately 20 acres located directly east of Greg Rogers Park and 1300 feet south of East Naples Street into ll3 lots (llO single family residential lots, and 3 common area lots). The Planning Commission recommended approval of the tentative map in accordance with their Resolution PCS-84-13. The Director of Planning recommended Council refer the map back to the applicant to make revisions in compliance with the mitigation measures identified in EIR-84-6; also revision of condition no. ll as listed in the Planning Commission Resolution PCS-84-13 to read as follows: ll. The project shall be provided sewer service through a permanent sewer pump station discharging into the Naples Street sewer basin. The developer shall enter into an agreement providing for the ongoin9 operation and maintenance of said station with the City of Chula Vista. Principal Planner Lee submitted diagrams of the proposed development noting the ingress and egress, the 40 foot wide road parallel in Gre9 Rogers Park and school, the recreational area of the park, the private streets as a loop system. Mr. Lee noted the subdivision manual recommends private streets be limited to 80 units or less and this subdivision will have over 100 units. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt said one of the issues involves the grading, drainage and the pump station. He added he met with the engineers of the project and have worked out a solution to the grading and the drainage. As to the pump station, it is the City's policy not to encourage sewer pump stations - gravity system is preferred; however, in this particular case, staff is proposing the pump station be built and maintained by the City. A monthly p~ment will be made to the City by the developers with the people in the Subdivision paying for this maintenance cost, As to the private streets, the trips per day will exceed 1,000. If the streets are private, the City will not be serving them with maintenance, street sweeping, etc. Mr. Lippitt recommended the streets be concrete rather than asphal t. The Planning Commission considered this but noted the cost would be over ~lO0,O00 and recommended the asphalt. City Council Meeting - 6 - October 23, 1984 Councilman Scott commented if this is an "affordable project", the concept is wrong by having private streets maintained by the homeowners which will only increase their maintenance costs. Mr. Lee submitted the sketch noting where the stub street is being proposed by the staff. Council discussion ensued on this requirement. E. PUBLIC HEARING P-84-14 - CONSIDERATION OF PRECISE PLAN FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF CHULA VISTA WOODS SUBDIVISION - STAFFORD-GARDNER DEVELOPMENT Principal Planner Lee stated this item involves consideration of the precise plan for the Chula Vista Woods Subdivision (preceding agenda item). The Environmental Impact Report is also an earlier item. The developer proposes to develop the subdivison with manufactured houses consisting of three basic floor pl arts. The staff's analysis is that the plan as submitted lacks the specificity normally required of most precise plans. This is due in part because the development is a conventional single family development rather than a planned unit development. The main reason for the precise plan submittal at this point is to determine the adequacy of the subdivision map to accommodate the manufactured units on the smaller lots and the effect of the reduced setbacks on the private streets and livability of each lot. After reviewing the precise plan and tentative map, it is the staff's opinion that the project should be allowed to continue to the next step in development after revisions are made to bring the map into compliance with the mitigation required in EIR 84-6. On September 12, 1984 the matter was reconsidered by the Planning Commission who failed to forward a recommendation by the following vote: three ayes, one no, two abstentions and one absent. The Director of Planning recommended Council refer the plan back to the applicant to make revisions in compliance with mitigation measures identified in EIR 84-6. Mr. Lee noted the garage requirements, setbacks, parking, RV storage lot which would be fenced and the elevation of the houses. No room additions will be allowed and the general scope will conform to the the Master Landscaping Plan. Mr. Lee noted the Planning Commission did not submit an approval to the City Council since it takes four votes for approval and only three were granted. A general Council discussion followed with staff regarding: 1. the stub street; 2. access to Medical Center Drive; 3. future proposals by United Enterprises for the adjacent areas; City Counci 1 Meeting 7 October 23, 1984 4. how the stub street would fit in with United Enterprises plans; 5. l~he two endangered species which are termed "threatened" species; 6. Comparative subdivisions in the City having one access; 7. analogy of this project with that of a mobile home park project; 8. the income level of the residents who would qualify to purchase these units; 9. It is designed for first time buyers primarily or second time buyers under certain conditions. Council raised the question of whether someone could come in and purchase several units. Mr. Desrochers, Director of Conmnunity Development stated the requirement is for the purchaser to live in the home. In answer to Council's questions, City Attorney Harron stated a condition could be made whereby it would be voluntary on the part of the developer to enter into an agreement stating that he would sell to one buyer per home, Councilwoman McCandliss noted the buyers do not have to go with the developers financing plan, they could get conventional financing. Mr. Desrochers stated the loans are assumabale if a second time buyer qualifies. During the first three years, there is a pre-payment penalty imposed. A recess was called at 8:50 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:00 p.m. Speaking in support of the proposal was Tom Davies, Attorney for the applicant, stating it is a planned unit development - there will be a home owners association charged with maintaining the streets. In the past, Chula Vista has become a party to the CC&R's. As to the stub street, the developer opposes it because it will open up the possibility of through traffic. Mr. Don Gardner, 4351 Grace Road, Bonita stated the endangered species are the home owners who cannot afford to buy a home. They are offering these low cost homes for these people and can do so if they are allowed to build llO homes. If the Council opts to protect the endangered species, they will lose ten homes (ten lots). Mr. Gardner noted the price of the homes will range around $86,000 or a monthly payment of approximately $754. He compared this with the Terra Nova Subdivision which has a monthly payment of approximately $1,240. Mr. Jack Gardner, 4363 Grace Road, Bonita noted the construction of duplexes he built in the area south of Castle Park. He stated that project is not something he is now proud of since it was designed for one family and as many as three families are living now in one unit with converted garages. The reason for this is there was no control on that project. This particular project will have control: there will be no garage conversions, cars will be required to park in the garages, RV's would have to park in the storage area, trash cannot be kept in front of homes, etc. City Council Meeting - 8 - October 23, 1984 In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' question, Mr. Don Gardner explained the construction of manufactured housing. Mr. Mike Bingham, 4877 Viewridge Avenue, San Diego, stated their reasons for objecting to the stub street as proposed by staff - if the street is extended to Medical Center Drive, it will conflict with Naples Street alignment. If the stub street is proposed at any other location, the developer stands to lose one or two lots. Mr. Mitchel Beauchamp, 1843 East 16th Street, National City representing Pacific Southwest Biological Service stated his firm did the original biological study on this project and were the ones who located the two "sensitive plants". To call them threatened or endangered i s not correct. He is also a member of the Fish and Game Committee. Mr. Beauchamp remarked these plants can produce in a large mass because they are a hybrid plant - it is a ragweed and can be preserved elsewhere on the site. The plant will be here beyond the 15 years or forever. Mr. Michael Spata, Attorney representing United Enterprises, stated they have a strong opposition to the condition of the stub street. Environmental Impact on this project does not declare the necessity for the stub street. If it is locked in, it may have some inverse condemnation impact and United Enterprises stands to lose several thousand dollars on it. City Attorney Harron stated he has no concern about the inverse condemnation. Mr. Mark Longley-Cook, Suite llO, 1007 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, representing United Enterprises, reiterated the stub street is of major concern to them. A secondary access is not needed and although the project has been on the books for seven years, there has never once been a proposal for a secondary street. Dr. Wendy Longley Cook, Suite lllO, 1007 Fifth Avenue, San Di ego, remarked the question was whether or not the homeowners would be paying for the secondary street. To add a secondary street at this time would be discretionary and it must comply with CEQA. The environmental impact report does not address what the impacts would be for the secondary access. This Council cannot add another secondary condition that would provide substantial significant impact unless the EIR is revised. Dr. Longley-Cook asked Council to reject their staff recommendation on the stub street noting "it i s nice to have but not necessary". Director Krempl stated that the addition of the stub street will not be an expense to the homeowners. Mr. Harold Wier, 4855 B Ruffner Road, San Diego, Wier Biological Firm, referred to the EIR which indicated the plants were extremely significant. If the population of the plants were to be eliminated, there is the question of whether they can be transplanted. This has been done in other areas with some negative results because there was no follow-up on the planting. There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearings were declared closed. Council discussion with staff followed regarding the Homeowners Association; the private streets vs. the public streets; the stub street and its impact; the stub street can be put in without the developer losing any lots; the financing of the project; an agreement with the developer to sell to single buyers; and general overview aspects of the entire project. City Council Meeting - 9 - October 23, 1984 MSC (Malcolm/Moore) to change the significant biological impact in the EIR to insignificant and to certify the EIR. Councilman Scott spoke against the motion as did Councilwoman McCandliss noting problems with CEQA. The motion carried with Councilwoman McCandliss and Councilman Scott voting Mayor Cox suggested both items "D" and "E" resolutions should be brought back to Council and specific directions should be given to the staff regarding the stub street and the concrete vs. the asphalt roadways. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to ask staff to prepare resolutions on "D" and "E" - tentative map and precise plan. MSC(Cox/Moore) that the staff be asked to include a provision for a stub street. Discussion of the motion centered on other choices which could be made for a stub street, the implications of reverting it back, hew much is it going to cost and have a staff report on this. The motion carried with Councilman Malcolm and Councilwoman McCandliss voting "no". Councilman Moore stated he would like to have more information on the asphalt vs. concrete roadways and the stub street. Mayor Cox stated he would like to have information concerning tightening down the price range of the homes and suggested staff meet with the developers to enter into a development agreement with the City the City may be able to contribute some of the low and moderate income housing funds to promote this agreement. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to refer these items to staff to consider when they come back with the tentative map. Councilwoman McCandliss agreed that some tightening down of the price range should be considered since there are many allowances given to this project which will make up for it. 6. PUBLIC NEARING PCA-84-6 - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO TITLE 18 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAPS FOR ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUMS (Continued from the meeting of October 15, 1984) (Director of Planning) a. ORDINANCE 2091 AMENDING SECTIONS 18.12.150 AND 18.12.090 AND ADDING A NEW SECTION 18.12.150 TO ALLOW PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAPS FOR ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUMS - FIRST READING This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. City Council Meeting - lO - October 23, 1984 Director of Planning Krempl explained that on July 16, 1984, the City Council accepted the report on the land development process in the City of Chula Vista. The report recommended several changes to help improve or expedite the development process. One such change was to allow the Planning Commission to approve tentative maps for one-lot condominiums which is the subject of the report. On October 15, 1984, the Council continued this item for one week to assess its impact. The following additional comments were offered for clarification: 1. This amendment would apply to al 1 requests for condomi ni ums involving a single lot, either undeveloped property or conversions. 2. As a prerequisite, all of the ordinance condominium standards would have to be complied with. 3. Any tentative map action by the Commission can be appealed to the Council if desired. 4. These actions are felt to be ministerial, routine and apart from zoning or site plan and design issues. This is confirmed by the fact that often the zoning is in place, plans have been received and approved by the Building and Housing Department, permits issued and construction initiated at the time a tentative one-lot subdivision map is processing. Director of Planning Krempl stated he stands by his original position and recommendation since this can be appealed to the City Council. Councilman Scott recommended a one year review. There being no further comments either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to amend the ordinance to state that it is to come back in one year with a report on any problems. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to place the ordinance on first reading, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. (Councilman Malcolm was not present at this time) Mayor Cox noted the revised ordinance before the Council which is being voted on. 7. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS(None) CONSENT CALENDAR ( 8-15 MSUC (Moore/mcCandliss) for approval of the Consent Calendar. City Council Meeting - ll - October 23, 1984 8. RESOLUTION 11787 ACCEPTING, DEDICATING AND NAMING CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY IN SAID CITY FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY PURPOSES LOCATED AT 1295 THIRD AVENUE (Director of Public Work s/Ci ty Engineer) Texaco, Inc. submitted plans to redevelop its property on the northeast corner of Third Avenue and Palomar Street. The valuation of the work being done under the building permit exceeds $10,000. In accordance with Section 12.24.010 of the Municipal Code, the City may require dedication of street right-of-way as needed. In order to gain a total of lO-feet between the curb face and the property line along Third Avenue, Texaco, Inc. is being required to dedicate a 2-foot strip parallel to the existing property line. The extra 2-feet will provide adequate room for the existing overhead utilities should they be undergrounded in the future. The total area of the dedication is 308 square-feet. 9. RESOLUTION 11788 ACCEPTING GRANTS OF EASEMENT FROM RATNER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES WITHIN PARCELS 5, 6 AND 7 AND FOR STREET PURPOSES ALONG BAY BOULEVARD WITHIN PARCEL MAP 84-9 (A PORTION OF RANCHO DE LA NACION MAP 166) IDirector of Public Works/City Engineer) On August 31, 1984, the Engineering and Planning Departments conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map 84-9. One of the conditions of approval was the dedication of a portion of Bay Boulevard in accordance with Chula Vista Drawing T-690 {a plan prepared and approved by the City of Chula Vista Engineering Department staff). The developer i s al so proposing the construction of a public storm drain system through parcels 5, 6 and 7. The City therefor needs an easement for said storm drain system. lO. RESOLUTION 11789 ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE GENEPJ~L CONSOLIDATED ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1984 TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK (City Clerk) With the consolidation of elections by most of the cities in the County, the Registrar of Voters' staff will not be able to issue official results until at least 28 days after the election. However, because~ requirements of Section 22932, Elections Code, semi-official results will be submitted to the Council at the meeting of November 13. As soon as the offical results are received, they will be written into the permanent record. lla. RESOLUTION 11790 APPROVING WAGES FOR UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY EMPLOYEES FOR FY 1984-85 Hourly employees receive no benefits; however, the wages paid to these individuals are adjusted annually in keeping with adjustments awarded to other City employees. This maintains the internal alignment of the salary plan, as well as keeping the hourly employee wages at a level competitive with other agencies. The unclassified hourly employees will be granted a 5% salary increase retroactive to the first pay period in July (July 6, 1984). The total addi ti onal cost for this compensati on package i s approximately $22,900. City Council Meeting - 12 - October 23, 1984 b. RESOLUTION 11791 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION PLAN FOR MIDDLE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES FOR FY 1984-85 This resolution provides for the establishment of a compensation plan for middle managers for FY-1984-85. The middle management employees will receive a 5% salary increase and the payment of 2% of the employee contribution to the Public Employees Retirement System. In addition, it is recommended that certain classifications receive special adjustments above the 5% increase. It i s al so recommended that the market basket allowance for middle management employees be increased to $2,300. All benefit increases will be retroactive to the first pay period in July (July 6, 1984). c. RESOLUTION 11792 ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION AND FRINGE BENEFIT PLAN FOR UNREPRESENTED/UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES FOR FY 1984-85 This resolution establishes the compensation and fringe benefit plan for unclassified/unrepresented positions for FY 1984-85. Unclassified clerical employees are recommended to receive the following salary increase: Secretary to the City Manager 15% Secretary to the City Attorney 15% Secretary to the Mayor and Council 5% It is also recommended that the market basket for these employees be increased to ~2,300. ~1 benefit increases will be retroactive to the first pay period in July 1984 (July 6). The total additional cost for this compensation package is approximately $11,400. d. RESOLUTION 11793 ESTABLISHING EXECUTIVE AND MIDDLE MANAGEMENT FRINGE BENEFITS FOR FY 1984-85 The following changes are proposed to the fringe benefit plan for executive and middle managers: 1. It is recommended that the market basket for executive managers be increased to ~2,700 and for middle managers to $2,300. 2. A new position has been added to the Middle Management membership, i.e., Deputy Director of Public Works-Operations. 3. The positions of City Engineer and Director of Public Works Operations have been consolidated under the title "Director of Public Works/City Engineer'. 4. Beginning the first pay period in July 1984 (July 6, 1984), the City will pay 2% of the employee contribution to the Public Employees Retirement System for middle managers. 5. Police Captains will no longer be eligible for education incentive. City Council Meeting - 13 - October 23, 1984 e. RESOLUTION 11794 APPROVING COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CERTAIN UNCLASSIFIED/EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES FOR FY 1984/85 (City Manager, City Clerk, City Attorney) A City Council Committee (Scott/Malcolm) made the following recommendations for Fiscal Year 1984-85: City Manager $63,720 City Attorney $54,000 City Clerk $36,000 The cost of the compensation increase including fringe benefits for the above employees i s estimated to be approximately $19,700. 12. RESOLUTION 11795 APPROV ING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND ANTHONY CIOTTI FOR SERVICES RELATIVE TO THE CITY'S COMMUNITY HOUSING IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CHIP) FOR 1984-85 (Community Development Di rector) The current agreement with Anthony Ciotti for services in connection with the City Community Housing Improvement Program (CHIP) expired June 30, 1984. Mr. Ciotti is currently compensated at a monthly rate of $1,766 on the basis of 1,600 hours per fiscal year. It is proposed that a 5% increase be granted retroactive to July 6, 1984. The increase would amount to an $88 per month addition, or $1,854 per month. 13. RESOLUTION 11796 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH GARRY WILLIAMS FOR FY 1984-85 (Director of Parks & Recreation) On July 20, 1982 Council approved an agreement between Garry Williams and the City for an Open Space Coordinator to oversee the ten open space districts during FY 1982-83 and renewed for FY 1983-84. Mr. Williams is currently compensated at a monthly rate of $1,494. He works a minimum of 130 hours per month. It is proposed that a 5% increase be granted Mr. Williams retroactive to July 6, 1984. The increase would amount to $900. per year addition, or $1,569 per month. 14. ORDINANCE 2088 AMENDING ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING 4.07 ACRES OF SDG&E PROPERTY ON THE EAST SIDE OF I-5 AND NORTH OF WALNUT AVENUE FROM R-3 TO I-L-P - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (Director of Planning) The first reading on this item was conducted on September ll, 1984. During the second reading on September 18, 1984, the Council was informed by the adjacent residents that the applicant had been working on the property clearing the vegetation and trees from the site and causing noise and dust. The Council directed that the second reading not take place and reschedule the rezoning matter for a public hearing. This item was placed on first reading City Council Meeting - 14 - October 23, 1984 on October 15, 1984 with the amendment stating the conditions agreed to between the neighbors and the developers be part of the ordinance. ~ so, staff requested a criteria for "clearing" the land be reported back to Council. The Mayor noted the ordinance was revised to include the additional conditions. 15. ORDINANCE 2089 AMENDING SECTION 2.02.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO CONFLICT OF INTEREST DESIGNATED OFFICIALS SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (City Attorney) This amendment deleted the requirement for advisory boards and comamissi ons to prepare disclosure statements and clarifies existing City policy. This item was placed on first reading at the meeting of Octuber 15, 1984. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING 16. RESOLUTION 11797 APPROVING APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS UNDER THE CALIFORNIA PARK & RECREATION FACILITIES ACT OF 1984 (Parks and Recreation Director) When Proposition 18 was approved by the voters of California, it provided for regional competitive grants to help renovate, construct or develop a park or playfield area. The proposed renovation project to improve the playfield area behind Bonita Vista Jr. High School fits the criteria under the competitive regional grant section of Proposition 18. Council approval is necessary to file the application with the State of California. In answer to Councilman Malcolms' question, Mr. Foncerrada, Acting Director, Park and Recreation Department, stated the money can be used to develop ball/soccer fields. Mayor Cox noted Proposition 19 on that same June 1984 ballot which provided money for wetlands and related facilities. MSUC (Cox/Scott) for staff to investigate whether bond proceeds out of Proposition 19 could be applied for by the City for the Interpretive Center on the Bayfront - a report to come back on this. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. City Council Meeting - 15 - October 23, 1984 17. RESOLUTION 11798 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR FINANCING ASSISTANCE THROUGH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION FOR THE WIDENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF OTAY VALLEY ROAD (Cormunity Development Director) The Economic Development Administration {EDA) has grant funds available for up to a maximum of ~500,000 for projects meeting their criteria for economic and job development. An application for these funds has been prepared by staff for the widening and improvements of Otay Valley Road. EDA funds will be used to supplement anticipated tax increment and assessment district financing for this project. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 18. RESOLUTION 11799 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TREE TRIMMING SERVICE IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA { Di rector of Public Works/City Engineer) On July 26, 1984, City Council considered a report on street tree maintenance and monolithic curb/sidewalk policy. As a short term solution to existing probl eros i n street tree maintenance, staff proposed that a Request for Proposal be prepared for contractural trimming of approximately 1,O00 trees in the City. On October 16, 1984 the City Engineer received sealed bids for the tree trimming service. The low bid by Western Tree Service was below the engineer's estimate of S35,788 by $6,812.50 or 19% and it is recommended the contract be awarded to Western Tree Service. Councilwoman McCandliss noted the condition regarding construction of monolithic curb/sidewalk to be maintained adding the developer should be aware that the policy could be waived and encouraged to do that if it fits into his master pl an. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 18A. UNANIMOUS CONSENT ITE)4 RESOLUTION 11800 CONSENTING TO AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE CONSENT FORM TPJ~NSFERRING ALL STOCK OF CHULA VISTA SANITARY SERVICE INC. TO GSX CORPORATION (City Attorney) The Chula Vista Sanita~ Service has informed the City that all of their issued and outstanding stock would be transferred to GSX Corporation, a Delaware Corporation. Their operation in servicing contracts will be unaffected by this transaction. Councilman Scott stated he may have a potential conflict of interest on this item and left the dais at this time. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Scott abstaining. City Council Meeting - 16 - October 23, 1984 19. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT a. City Manager Goss reported that at the last Redevelopment Agency meeting, discussion was held regarding transferring the loans servicing from Crocker Bank to another bank. Crocker has agreed to pay $2,500 and staff will proceed with this transfer. 20. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox asked for support of Proposition "A" on the ballot which is an amendment to the Charter of the County of San Diego limiting the authority of the Board of Supervisors; prohibits the Board of Supervisors from interfering with subordinates of the Chief Administrative Officer; authorizes removal of the Chief Administrative Officer by a majority vote of the Board; places specified managers in the unclassified service and makes other changes relating to the County's personnel system. City Attorney Harron stated he is cautious about the requirement that no public funds are spent on the support of any propositions - such as staff time in researching and preparation of resolutions. The Council concurred it would be done by minute action. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to support Proposition "A". 21. COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilman Moore said he received a few calls from residents of the Industrial Park area of the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee stating their concerns about not being represented on the Committee. Since there are five members on the Committee now, Councilman Moore proposed that seven members be authorized with at least one to come from the Industrial area. MS (Moore/McCandliss) to authorize the Mayor to expand the committee to seven and to include a member of the Industrial Park Area. Community Development Director Desrochers indicated that the Project Area Committee is not in favor of this expansion. They felt they would lose about two months time of their past efforts waiting for appointees. Mayor Cox noted the meeting planned at which all the residents of the area will be invited. City Attorney Harron declared the expansion of the Committee would necessitate the posting of notices according to the Maddy Act. Mayor Cox declared the motion out of order since it is a Redevelopment Agency item. b. Councilman Scott discussed Medical Center Drive which is now a major collector street. He added when any change of this type occurs, it should be done with a modification to the General Plan and asked when this will be coming back. Director of Planning Krempl stated he is not aware of any requirement to amend the General Plan because of the name change, but if there is a change in the street realignment, then there would be need for the general plan amendment. Councilman Scott indicated this was the Councils' intent. Attorney Harron said this should be done prior to proceedinq with the final plans for the Dro.iect. City Council Meeting - 17 - October 23, 1984 c. Councilwoman McCandliss referred to the Council informatian on Proposition 41 included in the packet. If this Proposition passes, it would have a negative impact on the residents as far as their health, safety and welfare are concerned. Since the Council represent the citizens, she felt more consideration should be given to this Proposition. It was moved by Councilwoman McCandliss that Proposition 41 be docketed and considered by the City Council. The motion died for lack of a second. ADJOUR~ENT AT 11:30 p.m. to the Council Conference of Thursday, October 25, 1984 at 4 p.m. to the special scheduled meeting of Tuesday, October 30, 1984 at 7 p.m. and the the special Gouncil meetin9 scheduled for November l, 1984 at 7 p.m. . "~,~f,'2~-~-(-' ~'~~ JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC u'City Clerk WPG:0497C PAG