HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/11/18 SD County Supervisors
AGENDA
JOINT SAN DIEGO COUNTY / CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS / CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
9:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1992
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION CENTER
BOARD CHAMBERS
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY
SAN DIEGO, CA 92101
I. ROLL CALL
.
George Bailey, 2nd District
County Board of Supervisors
. Mayor Tim Nader
City of Chula Vista
II. PUBLIC COMMENT
Members of the public may address the Joint Board of Supervisors/City Council
on any subject matter under the jurisdiction of the Joint Board of Supervisors/
City Council. However, pursuant to the Brown Act, no action can be taken by the
Joint Board of Supervisors/City Council unless listed on the agenda.
III. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ON THE OTAY RANCH
IV. WATER AVAILABILITY
. Metropolitan Water District
. San Diego County Water Authority
. Otay Water District
V. ADJOURNMENT
To the next Joint San Diego County Board of Supervisors/Chula Vista City
Council meeting from 1:00-4:00 p.m., Tuesday, November 24, 1992, at the City of
Chula Vista Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910
tables:\bofsagnd.ajl
AGENDA ITEM III
OT A Y RANCH TRANSPORT A TION PLANNING PRESENTATION
JOINT SAN DIEGO COUNTY/CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP
November 18, 1992
O. OVERVIEW
I. SETTING
A. REGIONAL CONTEXT
1. Interjurisdictional Task Force - Transportation Subcommittee
a. Subcommittee Membership
b. Subcommittee Pwpose
i. Study Area Definition
Boundary Limits: Discuss How Established
Application of Standards in this Area (Excluding
Bonita)
ii. Development of Analysis Methodologies
iii. Reviewed Baldwin New Town Plan
iv. Input to Developing Otay Ranch Alternative Circulation Networks
v. Evaluated Impacts for Baldwin New Town Plan and Alternatives
VI. Resource for Resolution of Technical Issues
2. Combined South bay Transportation Model Buildout
a. Land Use Components/Project Location
i. Fringe Area: SANDAG Series 7 Regional Forecast (Year 2010)
ii. Southbay Area (Offsite): Detailed Forecast (Buildout)
Chula Vista General Plan
County of San Diego General Plan (East Otay Mesa)
City of San Diego General Plan (Otay Mesa)
iii. Onsite: Otay Ranch Alternatives Analyzed in Detail (Buildout):
Baldwin New Town Plan
No Project Alternative
Composite General Plans (See i, ii above)
Phase I-Progress Plan
Environmental Alternative
Phase II - Progress Plan
b. General Input Assumptions .
i. 10 Lane Freeway Capacity (1-5, 1-805), Regional Transportation Plan
calls for 8 Lane, Pressure Indicates Need for 10 Lanes
ii. Arterial Connections TolFrom Otay Mesa Developments (Alta Road, La
Media Road) Evaluated
iii. Future Otay Mesa Industrial Trip Rate (100 trips/Acre)
iv. FreewayfToll Road Evaluation
v. Village!TDM Evaluation
Vl. International Airpon Not Considered
vii. Border Crossing Projection of 20 Year Growth Based on 10 Year
Historical Trend Data
II. ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
A. STREET DESIGN STANDARDS AND THRESHOLDS
1. Adopted Chula Vista Standards As Enhanced by Transportation
Subcommittee
2, LOS E for Freeways, LOS C for Arterials
B. IMPACT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY
1. Segment Capacity Analysis
a. Comparison of Modelled Volume with Circulation Element Classification and
Capacity
b. Impacts Identified in Terms of Roadway Miles by Level of Service and Facility
Class
c. Impacts Compared to Composite General Plans Alternative
2. Intersection Capacity Analysis
a. ADT Values More Reliable Than Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes
Under Buildout Conditions
b. Method For Determining Entering Volume
c. Ranges of Impact U sed For Screening All Network Intersections:
Under 65,000 Entering ADT: Standard At-Grade Design
65-75,000 Entering ADT: Enhanced At-Grade Design
75-85,000 Entering ADT: Enhanced At-Grade or Grade Separated
Design
Over 85,000 Entering ADT: Grade Separation
d. For All Intersections With Over 65,000 Entering ADT, Detailed Peak Hour
Analysis Required Prior to Approval of Selected Alternative
3. Mitigation
a. Based on Modelled Volumes, Classification, and Adopted Capacity: Segment
Capacity Upgrades Required
b. Recommendations for At-Grade Intersection Improvements and Grade
Separations
c. Analysis of Significance
i. Not Significant, Not Reported As An Impact:
Arterial Segments: LOS A-C
Freeway Segments: LOS A-E
Arterial Intersections: Under 65,000 Entering ADT
ii. Level of Significance 1: Significant and Mitigable
lll. Level of Significance 2: Significant and Not Mitigable at the GDP Level
Due to Lack of Design Infonnation
iv. Level of Significance 3: Significant and Not Mitigable
d. Mitigation Implementation Review
i. For Impacts with Level of Significance 2 or 3 Additional Information
Gathered by the Jurisdictions
ii. Level of Difficulty of Implementation
Achievable
Moderate Degree of Difficulty
High Degree of Difficulty
e. Analysis of Significant Impacts After Mitigation
Summary of Impacts with Level of Significance 2 and 3 by Roadway
Mile and Number of Intersections
III. EXAMPLE OF ANALYSIS PROCESS
A. REGIONAL IMPACT EVALUATION
1. Trip Generation
a. Onsite Trip Generation
b. Offsite Trip Generation
2. Segment Capacity Analysis
3. Intersection Capacity Analysis
4. Comparison with Composite General Plans
5. Mitigation Measures
6. Mitigation Implementation Review
7. Analysis of Significant Impacts After Mitigation
B. FOCUSED VILLAGE DESIGN ANALYSIS
IV. REGIONAL ISSUES/CONCERNS WHEN DELIBERATING ON THE
PROJECT
A. 10 LANE FREEWAY CAPACITY (1-5, I-80S), REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION PLAN CALLS FOR 8 LANE, PRESSURE
INDICATES NEED FOR 10 LANES
B. ARTERIAL CONNECTIONS TO/FROM OTAY MESA DEVELOPMENTS
ACROSS OTAY RIVER VALLEY (ALTA ROAD, LA MEDIA ROAD)
C. FUTURE OTAY MESA INDUSTRIAL TRIP RATE (100 TRIPS/ACRE)
1. Calibrated to 100 trips per Acre
2. Creation of Development Thresholds
D. FREEWAY/TOLL ROAD EVALUATION
1. Diversion/Out of Direction Travel
2. Preservation of Right of Way
3. Tested Under Phase I-Progress Plan Assumptions
E. INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT
1. Brown Field/Twin Ports
2. No Effort to Analyze Impacts
F. BORDER CROSSING
1. Free Trade Bill
2. Expansion of Otay Mesa Crossing
3. New Third Border Crossing
4. Increased Traffic From Mexico (Primarily on Regional Facilities,
Potential Impact on Arterials)
G. TRIP REDUCTION STRATEGIES (REGIONAL)
H. VILLAGE DESIGN
1. Tested Under Phase I-Progress Plan
2. Incremental Benefit (Slight Improvement)
I. CMP LEVEL REVIEW
V. SUMMARY
A. PROJECT STATUS
B. RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
C. PLAN SELECTION
D. FUTURE ANALYSIS
1. Evaluation of Selected Plan Standard Methods and CMP
2. Transportation Phasing Plan Update
3. SPA Level Review
WATER SUPPLY
OUTLINE OF TALK
1. Introductions
2. Comparative Water Use (see attached chart)
3. Metropolitan Water District
a. Purpose, goals and responsibilities of MET
b. Service area for Metropolitan
1. Projected demand
2. Projected supply
c. Supply facilities and history
1. Colorado River Aqueduct
2. State Water Project
3. Los Angeles Aqueduct
4. Local supply
d. Supply augmentation
1. Colorado River Aqueduct
2. State Water Project
3. Water Conservation
4. Storage
5. Water Reclamation
6. Desalinization
4. San Diego County Water Authority
a. Purpose, goals, and responsibilities of Authority
b. 2010 Capital Improvements Program
c. Allocation of water from Metropolitan
d. Local supply development'.
1. Reclamation
2. Desalinization
S. Otay Water District
a. Boundaries of District as it relates to Otay Ranch
b. Master Plan of Water for District
c. Water conservation and reclamation programs
WATER USE
FISCAL YEAR 1989-90
FOR SAN DIEGO COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY
..----.----.,'" ------_._-,- ,- , ,.
.... Water Use.
........Acre-Feet.... \
Del Mar, City of
De Luz Heights MWD
Yuima MWD
National City, City of
Otay Ranch (Environmental Alternative)
San Dieguito WD
Rincon del Diablo MWD
Santa Fe ID
Ramona MWD
Vallecitos WD
Olivenhain MWD
Poway, City of
Fallbrook PUD
Otay Ranch (Composite General Plan)
Carlsbad MWD
Otay Ranch (Phase II Progress Plan)
South Bay ID
Padre Dam MWD
Bueno Colorado MWD
Otay WD
Oceanside, City of
Escondido, City of
Otay Ranch (New Town Plan)
Rainbow MWD
Helix WD
Valley Center MWD
San Diego, City of
1,449.9
3,454.0
4,256.4
7,027.4
7.471.9
8,559.2
8,740.6
12,451.7
12,915.9
13,436.3
13,480.8
13,610.4
13,767.0
16.579.3
17,844.2
18.371.6
18,844.3
21,068.2
22,419.8
22,809.5
28,763.1
29,194.1
31,030.1
33,629.4
43,616.5
52,628.6
242,521.1
SELECTED STATE WIDE
WATER USE DATA
San Diego County Water Authority'
Metropolitan Water Districtl
Metropolitan Service Area 1
Imperial Irrigation District.
Total Municipal and Industrial Use in State2
Central Valley Project2
Total Agricultural Water in State2
Total Water Use in State2,3
.-'-,.;,..-.-.-.-......................_,---_.'.-................
;i!';;~jfijZiij~t;iil;
i[!>>~~II~.I!i
626,394
2,108,890
3,795,338
2,750,000
6,590,000
7,000,000
32,910,000
40,460,000
· Regional Urban Management Plan for the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California. 1988-89 AFY use.
2 California Water: Looking to the Future, 1990, Department of
Water Resources, 1987. 1985 use.
3 1980 _ 42,840,000 acre-feet; 1985 - 40,460,000 acre-feet;
2010 - 43,220,000 acre-feet.
· 1988-89 AFY use from Water Authority.
,,~
E~"""" ~....
D.A..... RAnCH
JOINT
PLANNING
F'I'IOJfCT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. CITY OF CHUl.A VISTA
COMBINED PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD/COUNCIL HEARING DATES
giYi
ii!>>:lg!;!1;1!n!!.~Yi:!I!ii!ln!ii!i
;:::':::::=::':
.. '''w''
'iiIPl!f!&!i!j!i!1!!!!ti!iiii!ii!!!JllMfiI9iJ!!i!l!!i
......:....<.......:.:.~:;:
.............
Thursday
11/12/92
Commissions
5-7
Tuesdsj 11/17/w' HBBf'd/CSHBtil (i 19
Wednesday 11/18/92 Board/Council 9-1
'f.,Vean.esa.ay 11/18/92 Cemmioois85 3:00
Friday 11/7JJ/92 Commissions 3:00
Tuesday 11/24/92 Board/Council 1-4
Wednesday 12/2/92 Commissions 5-7
ffla~' 12/1/92 CSIM :8BS 1:00
~(edttf~uI8Y 12/9/f}:J Raarlf./CsHBeil J Ii
Wednesday 12/9/92 Commissions 5:00
FFiday 12,'11/9-2 CSIBJ:BiooisR5 3:00
\"f.' BS:a8saay 12,'16,'92 CSlBlBiooisBB 57
Thursday 12/17/92 Board/Council 4-8
Friday 12/18/92 Commissions 3:00
Friday 1/15/93 Commissions 3:00
Thursday 1/21/93 Board/Council 2.5
Wednesday 1/27/93 Commissions 5-7
Friday 1/29/93 Commissions 3:00
ChoIa Vista
Plan Alternatives,
City/Cnty Recomm.,
Baldwin Recommendation
Chala ,qst:B
TPBRSpSftati 8R I'Nater
CAC
TransportationjWater
C1UH8 Yffita
County DPLU
Chula Vista
Service/Revenue
ChoIa Vista
Conference Rooms
2&3
Ca1iB~Y DPLU
CM:
ChoIa Vista
Conference Rooms
2&3
CS1:tB1:y DPW
CIUHe YffitB
Chula Vista
Plan Alternatives,
City/Cnty Recomm~
Baldwin RecommendatIon
County DPLU Final EIR Distribution
and Staff Briefing
County DPLU Project Deliberation
County CAC
ChoIa Vista Project Deliberation
County DPLU Project Deliberation
Revi5ed NOYember S. 1992
215\combined.dts
315 Fourth Avenue, Suite A, Chula Vista. CA 91910 . (619) 422-7157' FAX: (619) 422-7690
NOTICE OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AND THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista will meet on November 18, 1992 at the County Board
Chambers, 1600 Pacific Highway, San Diego, CA, from 9:00 a.m. -
1:00 p.m..
SAID PURPOSE OF THE MEETING is for a workshop on
transportation and water issues for the otay Ranch project.
DATED: November 6, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
"I declare under penalty of perjury that I am
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that I posted
this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at
the Public er ices Building and at City Hall on
DATED. II ~ SIGNED 6/~~'