HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1991/09/24
"I declare un~cr penalty of perjury that I am
em:}!o'.:e~] by th0 t...:::ty of ChuiJ Vi~j"ta in tr,{)
C;;'~f.'J~ ~~f Hi€:' ':.:::::,.' G!u:. c:r,J th2t 1 posted
t' .:' P<;(,~j'''~ IA'~~"':'~ ~I~..;::-:;~: :;\',\::'\~~2;. :~~~~,:~~t-:~: cn
Tuesday, September 24, 1991 ." ' .. - ;{;;;;j . ;'::, ',:,~, C ./~""; .. Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. 0-'" .~, '--'r'~~'-''t ~........,. - -c:;;r'~~---" . Public Setvices Building
Re\!Ular MeetinS[ of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAll. TO ORDER
Councilmembers Grasser Horton ~ Malcolm ~ Moore ~ Rindone ~ and
Mayor Nader _'
1.
ROLL CALL:
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINlITES: None submitted.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Presentation regarding the tall ship .Californian. and Harbor Days Festival - Bruce Gordon
of the Tall Ship Society of San Diego County will review the activities of the tall ship
"Californian" while operating out of its southern home port in Chula Vista. Mr. Gordon will
also highlight the festivities scheduled during Harbor Days on Saturday, September 28th
at Chula Vista Harbor including a tall ship parade and free tall ship tours, coastal awareness
booths, live entertainment, marine gear swap meet, classic car show, crafts fair, and
children's games.
b. Proclaiming the Week of September 22 - 28, 1991 as .Coastal Awareness Week. - The
proclamation will be presented by Mayor Nader to Dr. Stephen Neudecker, Executive
Director of the Chula Vista Nature Interpretive Center.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 10)
The staff recOlTl1fU!1lliLlJ regarding the following items listed under the Consent Ca1eruJor will be eruu:tRd by the
COUJU:iI by OIU! motion wi1hout discussion unless a Coundlmemher, a member of the publU: or CUy staff requests
that the item be puIkd for discussion. If you wish to speak 011 OIU! of these items, please fill out a .Request to
Speak Form. available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complere the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendaJion; complere the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after PublU: Hearings and Oral
Comnwnii:aIions. Items puIkd by the publU: will be the Jim items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Request for placement of "Welcome. signs at the entrance of the City - Judy Schulenberg,
Community Chair, American Association of University Women, 643 Windsor Circle, Chula
Vista, CA 91910.
Agenda
-2-
September 24, 1991
b. Request for additional evening patrol for the Commercial Building at 2244 Main Street -
Eugene A. Tucker, Jr., President, San Diego Scientific Corporation, 2244 Main Street, Suite
1, Chula Vista, CA 91911.
c. Request for a traffic light on "H" Street, east of Otay Lakes Road at the entrance to the
Bonita VISta High School parldng lot - Robert J. Thomas, 965 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita, CA
91902.
d. Request for assistance in relocating a donated house to the Hilltop High School campus by
either 1) moving the house to the new location, 2) providing monetary assistance toward
this portion of the project, or 3) any portion of the cost - William G. Demos, Principal,
Hilltop High School, 555 Claire Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
6.A. RESOLUTION 16349 SUPPORTING THE URBAN CORPS OF SAN DIEGO'S GRANT APPUCATION
FOR SAN DIEGO COUNlYS RECYCUNG TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM - The Urban Corps of San Diego is requesting Council support
for a grant application to continue and expand collection services for the
City's office recycling program, and to offer collection services to Chula
Vista businesses. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City
Manager)
B. RESOLUTION 16350 SUPPORTING TERESA ALAND'S GRANT APPUCATION FOR SAN DIEGO
COUNlYS RECYCUNG TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM - Teresa
Aland is requesting Council support for a grant application to provide
consulting services for the design of collection and processing of landscape
wastes, and to establish a composting facility. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (City Manager)
7. RESOLUTION 16351 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CAUFORNlA STATE UBRARY
FOR UBRARY CONSTRUCl10N GRANT AWARD NUMBER P-85-032
UNDER THE CAUFORNlA UBRARY CONSTRUCl10N AND RENOVATION
BOND ACT OF 1988 (pROPOSITION 85) - On 4/23/91, the California
Library Construction and Renovation Board approved the City of Chula
Vista's grant application in the amount of $6,747,528 for the South Chula
Vista Library project. The resolution approves the agreement with the
California State Library to accept the award. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Library Director)
8. RESOLUTION 16352 AGREEMENTWITH RALPH ANDERSEN AND ASSOCIATES AND BAlJ)WlN
VISTA ASSOCIATES - The City of Chula Vista is the agency designated to
approve consulting contracts for the Otay Ranch Project. Ralph Andersen
& Assoc. has been selected by the Otay Ranch Executive Committee to
complete the ServicelRevenue Micro-Analysis. That report will determine
fiscal impacts associated with the project when consideting capital
expenditures as well as operations and maintenance costs. Staff
recommends approval of the resolutions. (Deputy City Manager Krempl)
Agenda
-3-
September 24, 1991
9.A. RESOLUTION 16353 ADOPTING TIlE PROPOSED BOUNDARY FOR TIlE EASTI.AKE
MAINTENANCE DISTRJCf NUMBER 1 (SALT CREEK AREA) . Through the
adoption of the resolutions, the Council will accomplish the formation of
EastLake Maintenance District No.1, Zone 1 (Salt Creek I Area) which will
maintain open space lots and landscaped parkways adjacent to said lots
along East "H" Street, Mt. Miguel Road and Proctor Valley Road within the
Slat Creek I Subdivision. The existing "overall" EastLake Maintenance
District No. 1 which currently includes all the EastLake development, the
Greens, the Olympic Training Center, and the Salt Creek I areas will be in
charge of maintaining all street medians and the SR-125 corridor. Staff
recommends approval of the resolutions. (Director of Public Works and
Director of Parks and Recreation)
B. RESOLUTION 16354 APPROVING TIlE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS, DESCRIBING TIlE
IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING TIlE <J1Y ENGINEER TO PILE A
"REPORT"
C. RESOLUTION 16355 WAIVING TIlE PUBUC HEARING AND APPROVING TIlE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT"
D. RESOLUTION 16356 ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS, FORMING AN OPEN SPACE DISTRJCf AND
CONFIRMING TIlE DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR EASTI.AKE
MAINTENANCE DISTRJCf NUMBER 1, ZONE D (SALT CREEK 1 AREA)
10. RESOLUTION 16357 AUTI-JORlZING TIlE BALDWIN COMPANY TO CONSfRUCf APORTION OF
EAST "Ii" STREET FROM EASTI.AKE DRIVE TO SAN MIGUEL ROAD, TO
GRADE A PORTION OF SR-l25 AND RECEIVE A CREDIT AGAINST
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACfFEES . The Baldwin Company
has requested authorization to construct a portion of East "H" Street and
SR-125 and receive a credit against Transportation Development Impact
Fees, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2251 and as amended, for the
construction of said roads. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as publii: ""arinl}' as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, pIeose flU out the "Request to Spemc Farm" avaiJJJble in the lobby and suhmU it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green farm to speak in favor of the staffrecommendlllion complete the pink farm
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendaIion.) CommoIts are 1imiJed to five minutes per individual.
None submitted.
Agenda
-4-
September 24, 1991
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunily for the genuaI public to address the CiJ.y Council 011 any subject mailer within the Council's
jurisdiction that is not an item 011 this agenda. (State law, however, generally proIUbits the city Council from
toIdng aaion 011 any issues not induJled 011 the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council 011 9UCh a
subject, please complete the yeIIow "RLquest to SpeoJc Under Oral Communk:a1ions Form" availal>k in the Inbby
and submit it to the CiJ.y CIerlc prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speok, please give your nmne and address
for record purposes and follow up acJion. Your time is limited to tJuu minutes per speoku.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expeaed to elicit substanlial discussions and deliberations by the
Council, stoff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individuol/y by the Council and staff
recommouiJJtions may in certain cases be presented in the aJtenwtive. Those who wish to speok, please Jill out
a "Request to Speak!' form available in the lobby and submit it to the CiJ.y Clerk prior to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five mUwtes-
11.
REPORT
ADDITIONAL STOP SIGN AT TIm INIERSECTION OF COUNTRY VISTAS
LANE AND CRES1VIEW DRIVE IN BONITA LONG CANYON - Staff received
two letters and a petition requesting a stop sign for the southbound
approach at the intersection of Counny Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive in
Bonita Long Canyon. Staff recommends that the Council deny the request
for a southbound stop sign at the intersection of Counny Vistas Lane and
Crestview Drive. (Director of Public Works) Continued from "Written
Communications" at the 8/27/91 meeting.
12.
REPORT
GRANTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT PEE (DIP) CREDIT FOR RlGHf-OF-
WAY DEDICATION, KELTON PROJECT, SOUTIIEAST CORNER OF OTAY
LAKES ROAD AND EAST "H" STREET - At the 8/27/91 meeting, Council
directed staff to prepare a report relative to the applicants request for DIP
credit for right-of-way dedication which was a condition of their
development. Staff was instructed to consider what had been required on
past projects and was directed to include a discussion of impacts which
might result from granting DIP credit for right-of-way dedication. Staff
recommends Council accept the report and require full dedication with no
DIP credit given for said dedication. (Director of Public Works)
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items whidl have been forwarded to them for consideraJion by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
Agenda
-5-
September 24, 1991
ITEMS Puu.ED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the cay CoundI wiJI discuss items which Iu:we been removed from the Consent CaIendor. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the public wiD be considered prior to those pulled by CounciImemIJen. Public
ComnumlS an limited to five minutes per individuaL
OTIlliR BUSINESS
13. <JlY MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
14. MAYOR'S REPORTCS)
a. Campaign Finance Ordinance - disclosure of independent expenditures.
15. COUNaL COMMENfS
Councilman Moore: Council consideration to appoint nominees to the Mobilehome Rent Review
Commission by either a nominee from each individual Councilmember or by a Council interview
process. The rationale for this is that this is an unusual Review Board and the action of this
Commission would not be appealable. Continued from the 9/17/91 meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Carreras v. City of Chula Vista,
et a!.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on October
1, 1991 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Joint City Council/Redevelopment Agency Meeting wiJI be held immediately after the City Council
meeting.
t, COUNCIL AGBNDA STATBMENT
ITEM ~
MEETING DATE 9/24/91
ITEH TITLE: Proclamation - Proclaiming the Week of Sept 22-28, 1991 as
"COASTAL AWARENESS WEEK"
SUBMITTED BY:
Mayor Tim Nad~
(4/5THS VOTE: YES NO xx
The proclamation declaring the week of September 22 through
September 28, 1991 as "COASTAL AI'IARENESS \-vEEK" will be presented
by Mayor Nader to Dr. Stephen Neudecker, Executive Director of
the Chula vista Nature Interpretive Center.
<<-1 b. - \
September 20, 1991
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
,.~
George Krempl, Deputy City Manager ~
City Council Meeting of September 24, 1991
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Transmitted herewith are the agenda and related materials for the regular City
Council meeting scheduled for September 24, 1991. Comments regarding the
Written Communications are as follows:
Sa. This is a letter from Judy Schulenberg, representing the American
Association of University Women, calling the City's attention to the
lack of welcoming signs to the City of Chula Vista and offering the
group's assistance. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE ACKNOWLEDGED
AND THE SUGGESTIONS BE INCORPORATED INTO THE CITY COUNCIL'S OVERALL
REFERRAL ON CITY ENTRY SIGNS. THE TIMING AS TO ENTRY SIGN
IMPLEMENTATION IS IN PART AWAITING THE FINALIZATION OF THE I-5/SR 54 AND
I-5/E STREET RAMP COMPLETION SO THAT OPTIMUM SIGN VISIBILITY CAN BE
DETERMINED.
5b. This is a request from Eugene A. Tucker for additional evening patrol in
the vicinity of 2244 Main Street, Chula Vista. Mr. Tucker has indicated
that there is a problem regarding nighttime burglaries at this
location. Patrol officers working in this area have been notified of
this problem and have been advised to make a special effort to spend
more time in that vicinity. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT A LETTER BE SENT TO
MR. TUCKER ADVISING HIM OF THIS ACTION.
Sc. This is a request from Robert J. Thomas, 965 Buckaroo Lane, requesting
that the City install a traffic signal on East "H" Street, east of Otay
Lakes Road at the entrance to Bonita Vista High School's parking lot.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE FORWARDED TO STAFF AND THE SAFETY
COMMISSION FOR REVIEW AND REPORT BACK TO COUNCIL.
Sd. This is a request from Hilltop High School for assistance from the City
in connection with moving a 2,000 square foot house from Otay Valley
Road to the Hilltop High School campus to be used for housing foreign
exchange teachers. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS MATTER BE REFERRED TO
STAFF TO MEET WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE HIGH SCHOOL AND THAT A
RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE TYPE OF ASSISTANCE BE BROUGHT BACK TO THE
COUNCIL NEXT MONTH.
JDG:mab
trans
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION
aa
urn
OF UNIVERSIT , ,Ii" S n v, P ~1
, r l' I~, I.. ' " 's 0 I
I: l';. f"'-'--" --,o.'-'-"'l , ! i i I.
, fj \ , ......' " , ~ , I I j
,:! I SEP I 2 :~'='I ""j
I~""'; ; I..._e \
I L_, ,_.J I
CfT' ' -~, I
: ". .,. _.,_._~~
Seutem'':jer 9,-1991
Dear Mayor Narer ana Councilmemryers,
In our effort to ~e a positive force in t~e community,
our organization woulr li~e to call your attention to t~e
a~sence of any welcoming signs to t~e city of C~ula Vista.
~s citizens interestec in t~e image of our city, we feel
simple signs of welcome offer to ot~ers t~e perception that
C~ula Vista is a friencly ane' ~ospi t a')le place. I-Ie ',now t~is
to ~e true anr support any effort mace to sene' t~is message.
We appreciate your consireraton of t~is issue ana offer
our group energies to ma'(ing t~e installation of these signs
possi'ole.
T~an~ you for your representation ana service to t~e city.
sincerell'
Jtd..y AcJU.J!Lv_l,u-'<-j--
tJucy SCDulen~erg CI
Community C~air
~,1\UT,\T
6~? Winc'sor circle
C~ula Vista,Ca. 91910
.\
G'" 7' i C">C"> ~
((. , -,,4- a~,.:...,_ ~ =4~
c:~; ?7y,LJ I -<.-< :::tJ
k1 1"11
" -0 ~)
a.A y':1 ~.<: - iT1
....~-z..- ..,...P-- t" ......
~O, j " , "4~:
JJ?"_--rt--r.'.-t. ~...----: ,~,: 'j: r"I!"
....-/ "~;~_, }/I .....".. CJ
...-I~, =< t~. -' t~'-< r C".~-"i :.:.
\_/ 1/ j/ ,/ "1"'J'> <=>
.
SA. -I
WRITTEN COMMUt<r!I(~!.~~'t~ONS
r\"-.,.O;;:O;;;::'l rll ~
August 28, 1991
/-~-.. -~
{'c: t~7 ,;2~ ,
C,,$.:, ,");-4 ( J)
,v,' -r-
()"....ft~J: '.::').;;;','-/
I ,__'''~.~_._~_.
~ i</' -;.~-I~ n \',7 ~ I ,,\i '
'Ir-, L., ":'. '.:- ~-~~ !~~\
I : r--'~ ~>---- ,- I' .
Ili: !, ,I l
\~.~, SEP \ 2 :991 \L::/\'
\ L ..~
CI:, ," . ,_to
c_-
Honorable Mayor Tim Nader
Office of the Mayor
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Re: Citizens Request for Additional Evening Patrol
of Commercial Building at 2244 Main Street,
Chula Vista, California 91911
Dear Honorable Mayor Nader:
I am requesting additional evening patrol of my
commercial building/retail computer business at the above
reference address.
I am making this request because I have been notified
by at least three (3) other business owners in the same
complex of nighttime burglaries having been perpetrated upon
them.
I have taken all possible security measures, however, I
feel that the most effective measure would be additional
police patrol after close of normal business hours. I would
emphasize the need for increased effective patrol between
the hours of 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m.
I appreciate your immediate attention to this matter.
I would like to have the burglar(s) apprehended as soon as
possible.
Sincerely,
Jr.
('")('") ~
--
~-!
-(,. -..::'.
..'\ ti]
" , :
"I.., -
-J
;;0
rTI
("')
rq
IJ ,,' ~
'Eugene A. lI'ucker
iPresident'
----- ,
- --------
--- - '-
....<- . ......
'l~\~, "', \{"
~
-1-'
~;"'"
"":.:::
P1
c:J
-"
['"- ~ '. ~
-.1:;',
-~
o
ZENITH ,.,
data systems ~
Groupe-Bull
2244 Main Street, Suite 1/ Chula Vista / California 92011/ (619) 575-8818 / FAX 575-8819
5b.'
fDJ /] @ rn 0 W~ P 1
wi SEP 1 7 1991 IW:
CITY COUiiCIC Off!CESJ
CHUU VISTA, CA
ROBERT J. THOMAS
CAROL J. THOMAS
965 Buckaroo Ln.
Bonita, Ca. 91902
619-479-2606
The Honorable
Mr. Tim Nader
Mayor
City of Chula Vista
276 4th Ave
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Dear Mr. Mayor,
The purpose of this letter is to urge you to place a traffic light
on "H" St., east of Otay Lakes Rd. at the entrance to the Bonita
Vista High School parking lot.
On September 12 I turned into the parking lot at approximately 7:05
A.M. I found the traffic flow west bound on H St. opposing my left
turn to be extremely heavy and, at what I observed, traveling at
excessive speed for a school zone. Traffic was backed up from the
left turn lane to Otay Lakes Rd. waiting to turn. I must add,
the high school students I observed making the left turn did so in
a very safe and effective manner. I believe, however, the
potential for an accident at that location is extremely high and
the lack of proper traffic control devices places the students at
unnecessary risk.
Thank you for your consideration.
Robert J. Thomas
COpy to:
Bonita Vista High School
"
., :/~
(f. ~~/>Z/~NP2,
- ~ / ,
.~~', /-/~4(7)
, v,
/) ,
J. ?l:-.-r2..-7-Z-<- '" ':'-" '7
WRITT?N~OMMUNICA TIONS
'5c. - ,
QQ ..0
--i-.j .~
-<.". ::u
1:8 ."
.."') :~)
- 'T'j
..... '.1'::::-
,,, ," 2?-J 1";')
0-'., 0
.~,.. ...."..j .~
I"r!):.:., 0
HILL TOP HIGH SCHOOL
filF j' ,"' ,A/). y'J> ;J
j/'-//LCe-rt//M- ~tUl/''fdz/
September 18, 1991
Mr. John Goss, City Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fauth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Goss:
The City of Chula Vista and its leaders have a long history of positive support for
its schools. The Sweetwater Union High School District and Hilltop High School
are proud of their longstanding partnership with this city's leadership. Included in a
long list of cooperative ventures is the city's assistance in welcoming foreign
educators to our area. . Some of the results include a growing number of students
and teachers traveling abroad, as well as receiving an equally increasing number of
visitors for both short and long term study. Two schools, Hilltop Academy of
Foreign Language and Global Studies (F.L.A.G.S.) and Bonita Vista High School
are formal sister-schools to comparative institutions in Japan, The People's
Republic of China, Russia and Germany.
An outgrowth of such ventures is the need to provide adequate housing for an
increasing number of foreign exchange teachers staying a semester or year as
resource specialists and consultants in our district. Our teachers who may teach or
visit schools abroad often stay in on-campus guest houses or dormitories. Private
homes for long-term teaching assignments are too inconvenient. In late October,
1991, a 2,000 square foot four-bedroom, three-bath home was offered to the school
district by Mr. and Mrs. Jimmy Shinohara for use as an international residence.
Such a home would be ideal, providing both living quarters as well as library, and
room for workshops and seminars. All of these activities would be associated with
district efforts to comply with the California Department of Education mandate to
globalize education and enhance student education in foreign language and culture
across the curriculum. The home would be placed on the Hilltop High School
campus and would provide the focus of the F.L.A.G.S. Magnet program.
Ultimately, the program would become the central focus for international studies,
global education, foreign language, and internationally focused multimedia
production, communication, and broadcasting.
555 CLAtRE. A VENUE I CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 I PHONE (619) 691-5640
5& -,
The estimated cost of moving and setting up this building is $85-90,000. An
attachment provides some itemization of costs. At this time services and potential
donations have been offered in the following manner:
1. $20,000 cash from the sale of palms on the Shinohara property;
2. a pending offer of assistance with roofing needs;
3. gas and electric hookup, including ditching, from SDG&E (tentative);
4. expertise from the American Society of Interior Designers;
5. some furniture from the Dick Kau Land Company, Inc.;
6. Involvement of students at the Chula Vista Adult Del Rey Center with
construction work after the house is set up;
At this time we are in need of either services or donations to assist with the move of
the structure from Sweetwater River Valley to the Hilltop High School campus. We
are asking the City of Chula Vista for assistance by either I) moving the house to
the new location, 2) providing monetary assistance toward this portion of the
project, or 3) any portion of this cost.
~~~
William G. Demos, Principal
Hilltop High School
Enclosure
c: Members ofthe Chula Vista City Council
c;) d - .z.
COST ESTIMATES
FOR
HILLTOP HIGH SCHOOL FOREIGN EXCHANGE TEACHER RESIDENCE
F.L.A.G.S. MAGNET CENTER
Moving costs for Shinohara residence from Sweetwater River Valley
to Hilltop High School campus................................... .$21 ,500
Set foundation and associated work................................. 19,200
Ut i1 it i es and underground.......................................... 9,400
Fencing and security............................................... 4,000
Additional site improvement, including landscaping & asphalt
removal.......................................................... 15,000
Further repairs to bring house up to code.......................... unknown
Furniture & interior decorating.................................... unknown
Telephone installation & equipment................................. unknown
Kitchen appliances (as needed)..................................... unknown
Houseware goods, including dishes, linen, etc...................... unknown
C;a-3
Abstract
The Foreign Language and Global Studies program at Hilltop High School in the Sweetwater Union High
District is an innovative program for students entering the 21 st century. The program emphasizes the
importance and relevance of foreign language study and global education with purposeful and
meaningful activities. Students are not only exposed to an enhanced curriculum which emphasizes the
economical, political, geographical, culturai and interdependence in today's increasingly shrinking global
village, but the program would use the latest technology available in the classroom.
The Next Century Schools Grant would provide the on-line hook ups for the recently donated satellite
dish. Hilltop High School proposes to provide international news broadcasts into every classroom and to
develop a computerized language center. Students will participate in telecommunication conferences
with students abroad on such topics as the environment. The proposed computerized language center
and the international broadcasts will accelerate language acquisition by making communication
meaningful and purposeful. The proposed program would provide staff developmenUtraining and
curriculum development for the entire staff, thus exposing all 1500 students to the available technology.
Hilltop High School will be a model school in the area of international technological education in the
classroom.
School Descriotion
The Sweetwater Union High School District is bordered by Mexico on the south and San Diego on the
north. With approximately 28,000 students, it is the largest secondary school district in California and
encompasses an area of almost 155 square miles. The district's schoois are located in the cities of Chula
Vista, Imperial Beach, National City, San Ysidro, and in unincorporated areas of San Diego County,
California. The district schools have an average minority population of 72.9%, an increase of 23% in the
past ten years. The minority rate is currentiy increasing at more than 2% per year and projections indicate
this upward trend will continue at an even faster pace in the next ten years.
Hilltop High School, the proposed school, has over 1500 students enrolled in grades 10-12.
Approximately 58% of the student population are minorities and 35% are Anglo. Any student interested
c;d. - ~
in the specialized program, Foreign Language and Global Studies (FLA.G.S.), is eligible. The program
draws low achieving students, gifted, high risk-youth as well as the average student seeking an education
for the 21 st century. Hilltop High School's F.L.A.G.S. program attracts students from diverse
language/cultural backgrounds who are interested in an international education where multicultural
education is at the forefront.
Proa ram Elements
The FLAG.S. program emphasizes the importance of world language stUdy which includes: Spanish,
French, German, Russian, Japanese, and Chinese. The History/Social Science, and English Language
Arts integrates global education concepts into the existing curriculum. While teachers have developed
curriculum that emphasizes the cultural, political, economic and interdependence in those countries
where the languages offered are spoken, the program lacks the technology that students will need by the
21 st century.
The FLAG.S. program includes international student exchanges, pen pal programs and sister school
partnerships across the globe. The program proposes to enhance the existing educational technology to
provide students with a window to the world. Hilltop High School was given a satellite dish that is capable
of receiving international broadcasts. FLAG.S. proposes to make the broadcasts available to all
students by hooking up the dish to each of the classrooms. In doing so, students who are studying a
world language could view broadcasts from the country being studied. Students would gain a greater
understanding for the culture, politics, economics and interdependence of the countries being studied.
Using the satellite dish and the existing computer lab, hook-up cables would provide the FLAG.S.
program with a computerized language center. Foreign language and international studies will be
enhanced by the use of the telecommunications center in that students will exchange letters, writing
assignments and projects with students from different parts of the world. Hilltop High School proposes to
be a mOdel school in international telecommunications. The language center and international
broadcasts will make communication in the foreign language more meaningful thus accelerating language
learning through high interest, meaningful activities.
C;J..5
Educational Exchange
ACCORD
"TO CIve fXCELLE~CE'
BONITA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL
WE AGREE TO ESTABLISH A PARTNER-
SHIP IN EDUCATION WITH THE HIGH SCHOOL
ATTACHED TO TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY. BEIJING
PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF CHINA.
TH I S PARTNERSH I P WILL I NCLUDE THE
FREE EXCHANGE OF CURRICULUM INFORMATION.
TEACHERS SHARING TEACHING TECHNIOUES AND
MATERIALS. STUDENTS EXCHANGING LETTERS
AND CULTURAL GIFTS. TEACHERS VISITING
AND TEACHING IN PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS. AND
STUDENTS VISITING AND STUDYING IN
PARTNERSHIP SCHOOLS.
THIS EDUCATIONAL EXCHANGE WILL
ALLOW EACH I NST I TUT I ON TO EXPLORE AI~D
EXPERIMENT WITH ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR
IMPROVING CO~~UNICATION BETWEEN OUR
RESPECTIVE PEOPLES AND CULTURES AS A
MODEL FOR EFFECTIVE JOINT VENTURES WITH
OTHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS AROUND
THE WORLD.
TH I S PARTNERSH! PIS HEREBY FORI1ALL Y
tST ABLI SHED TH I S 17TH DAY OF APR I L Ii"J
THE YEAR 1991. WITH THE SIGNING OF TH!S
ACCORD. BONITA VISTA HIGH SCHOOL AND
THE HIGH SCHOOL ATTACHED TO TSINGHUA
UN IVERS ITY BECOlvlE SISTER SCHOOLS.
SIGNED:
DR. THOMAS SCHAAF. PRI CIPAL
THE HIGH SCHOOL ATTACHED TO
TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY
. thJ ,~,~.fT~,~J~7J~.tIJX1~Lttj:
71-) ~1t~101frvgvp'?~YE4I~-rrH1i
-:~wr~~r ,~U -Yf3JJ!)'Gj{1~;'f
~
V {5 @!1 ~J0 ~:t-~i:~~J>']
1~~J\~{h\lt11~17( ~~x-zn-t~ UJ
i<~ ~-f1- ,\~ ~IJ fIft i i1 i +,S jJtcJ
fL::f~ J 1t\Itf7~Ii'J;~ 16) ~S- {i:: ~3 fJfft'7'J
\~t;(f"Jij:-~L IM.}}l~"/tlq \~~ I~ 0
~'ft~ " '. \W7;-- ~';:u,? 1-61 U
---- "
(/ H 1- ~t ~ ~ fli,il~ ~ Ii i;--\f I ,
ii/i fr- fi K~,)rTft1-x 75 t,vli~
4. ~J1.lJ;l..~ ~\;-tr~kru ~ Ii;] Y1^- ijjJ
\17 n ;tPo pfjlji}~f~}~, fg, 7~~)tu
tt~~Jj 1~1'~~J 1r:~~*l:J i!:fr#'~
1Xfi truM1i ~X-\~jAtz~l~ 1-&\"1
~ /- 1:#1 ~
J7\ \ft.l 0
11 IT 0 t;;. tL lE ~ I~ f2:: 'J!?
\f9 i'v--h.;1L. - 3f \"!Y R tt. \::} () ~1
JAJ.. 1J,t i ~,l?} tIt It};~ 1.f-t-.
~ F11Ji \~':p,*L?~&t i/&i:fi-fJT
r,f \~ If bX!~ ~ f1J tl;: 0
SIGNED: '/f tf (~
WA BANGRU. PRINCIPAL
DATE: ~ L I. i [q '1 ( 5A'" DATE:
/991 f f n (7 (iJ
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item(PA..S
Meeting Date 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution ,,, ~I(~ Supporting the Urban Corps of San Diego's Grant
Application for County of San Diego's Recycling Technical Assistance
Program.
Resolution If. ~S'O Supporting Teresa Aland's Grant Application for
County of San Diego's Recycling Technical Assistance Program.
SUBMITTED BY: Athena Lee Bradley, Conservation Coordinator~;.
REVIEWED BY:
I:"/v
City Manager (VJ" (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ NoX)
,.for
BACKGROUND:
Between 1988 and 1992, San Diego County budgeted a total of $3.5 million from the Solid
Waste Enterprise Fund to implement the Recycling Technical Assistance Program (TAP). Eligible
programs are to divert recyclable materials from County landfills. All nongovernmental grant
applicants must obtain a letter of support from the jurisdiction in which the proposed project will
be located. The due date for grant applications under this fiscal year funding cycle has been
extended to October 4, 1991 by 3:00 pm. This report describes two commercial recycling projects
for which City Council support is requested by the respective applicants for applications being
submitted under the Recycling Technical Assistance Program (FY 1991-92).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Approve resolutions supporting two separate grant applications for recycling projects proposed
within City limits.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The County of San Diego, through its Recycling Technical Assistance Program (TAP), has made
available $525,000 for this fiscal year to promote commercial and industrial recycling programs,
facilities, and activities. Funded projects would have the potential of benefiting the City through
establishing recycling, source reduction, and related projects that would assist the City in meeting
the goals established by State law AB 939, the Integrated Waste Management Act, and the
County Mandatory Recycling Ordinance.
In general, City Council has supported in concept proposed projects that will assist the City in
meeting these recycling goals, provided that these projects do not interfere with existing or
planned programs. Council support is again requested for two separate TAP grant applications
which do not appear to be in conflict with existing or planned programs.
C:, - ,
Support is requested on the following projects: 1) Urban Corps of San Diego, Business Recycling
Collection Project; and, 2) Teresa Aland, Infrastructure Dealing with Waste Well Earth
Restoration (INDWELLER)
Project Descriptions
1. Urban Corps of San Diego, Business Recycling Collection Project
The Urban Corps of San Diego, with partial funding from fiscal year 1990-1991 TAP
grant funding, currently provides weekly collection services for the City's Model Office
Recycling Program. Under the application to be submitted for this year's TAP funding
cycle, the Urban Corps proposes to continue offering this collection service, and expand
services to include collection at the Public Works Corporation Yard, two community
centers, and Senior Information and Referral Center.
Additionall y, the Urban Corps proposes to offer recycling collection services to small
businesses in the City. Small commercial establishments can sometimes find the costs
associated with recycling an impediment to program development. This is particularly true
in the first year of operation prior to cost reductions in refuse disposal being realized
through recycling.
Grant funding for collection to be provided to such establishments would allow targeted
businesses to firmly establish recycling as part of their operations in the first year,
working toward program sustainability in future years through the sale of collected
materials and cost reductions in waste disposal.
2. Teresa Aland, Infrastructure Dealing with Waste Well Earth Restoration
(INDWELLER)
The INDWELLER proposal is to provide consulting services for the design of collection
and processing of landscape wastes. It is proposed to create a network through which
landscape and horticultural businesses in the City could divert their materials for the
purposes of mulching and composting.
It is proposed to establish a composting facility to accept materials from area landscapers;
the material would be com posted and marketed as soil amendment feedstock. Through
this proposal, solid waste "green" materials could be diverted and converted to viable
resources to support a more sustainable approach to agriculture.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of this action. Projects awarded funding
are required to generate their own matching funds and will stand alone without future funding
needs.
r.-l.
O:n..'" ~! ,,",!(r-:f)
.' " ~."
..,.,,,~,,,''''H'
, "j ~ ~~ ~"MIt~
, r,~,,~,""'
;":r~ ','~:'l,;/Jf-; ;O;.,E~ ~R
~~,"/ . '''~i':!
~ ,IfF S~'~,>.~
~ '~'.W' ~ :' - ~'.
. ~,.~, - .1" :..r ::""1;(0
".1'
~;:...z : Ri1 ':'EP
~,., '-Id' ,,, \ 'Mn &~.~
'." .~, i
'::'!;;~5T ,\, 8W-OM
.: .'~,: ,1 . ~~
:,;::' '-', - :.~.'
;.!.~' ~ .
,:.:,.:C,
~':~ ,'~ ., r-',:~'
B~ ~
'o{ ,...,\~I~ 'i;^.;..
'q',
.:;C"~'t
.~. "'.. ; ..-.~, I, -~~,
~','.' "1 ~~,.~',
'';!{i'I)~.ai 'h."~ii!r
-,: ~'j;:,,)~~ '~
'.',"~ L~r,:~~;!~"
3'~;':Jer' ~.," ~
~r'~~ir'\\ i;'iJi~~1
.:.~ I ; ; iM-:
~''''''~I~B~' a1~1 (,::;,~'I
:)<;1 8~!I'~,., ~~~i.:'l.;:~
~~,' ?:€'iO
Vlii!!j ~\,h~! r"m'~~
i..\N A Si'f<P,jo
A!!CI~t,
;'~'~"..] "!~~ce'f ,~,,_~,c 5 !;ir.'
-: ,'" 'Hi"~ '):r'"';(Qf
'SA"'! Du~.t)t
A.................r.___I_...I
--
,::,1:;: ~.
-
--
'::e-a~ "'~ G!:a'!.
~ :';;:'r: .' ~ 1. 3- .:'~--;: ~ .::~
Attachment A
;~p~~~tet 2~. :9!:
:c~~ COt., M.n.qe~
:~~1 M&~.qe~'. O!!i~~
2'~ ro~'~ Ave~~~
C~~i. Vl~t., CA ~,~1C
.~~ \.,;::'~.;,r, ::Otp. 0: $dr\. :He:~o \,~ -Sl..Wrn~~t~i'1" ,) q~.n.':. iitpt.=l.l.Ciit-:'OI\ to U,,:
~':;""'~-r j( S.:I:''I. Q\c.'-:;o r'~:;'i.C WQtxt. Ct..;pdt'~e;,~, il"\ t'e~pc"v:;.~ to t.'\c r'ccc:r.1:- jli:cq>J.!:~1;
~:~~:) f~! prQP~,~l~ Qf!cr1~q ~.'te ~~~cri~l$ di~~t.iQ~ f=~m CQ~n~y land!11:,
P~r R:~/cli~q Tech~ic.l A..i$t4n~e: Proqr~m ~idelin=.. UCoSO i. soliciti~~
~:~~~~u=d County t~di~9 Q! c~, exicti~~ multi-.at~ridl. ~ecoYet'Y project
p~oYidin9 col!cction services tQ cn~a Vi,~~ City .~i~i'tr.tiY~ o!ti~e. ~nde:
t.J\.. cr."",-. v.,. t;.;I Made1 Oft ic" Itecydin, Pro,>um
UCOSO'I pr".ent 11"11 County T~ ,..nt k., .lloved UCoSD the opport.ni~y
~( dlverti~q cy~r 15,500 po~^d. ot r~cycl.b1es fro~ your City's Civic Ce~te'
O':l~~. du~i~q au: fit.t q~~tcr (J~n.-Au~~$tl af 19'1 .e~vices Tkeae result$
of ~el~~ively l.hor~inten~iye eo11~ction$. strongly enceu~.q= ~~e UCoS~ to 14ek
YQ~~ C~ty Co~~il's .~ppoct tor our nc~prQ(it .q~ncy'& 1'92 tAP 9r.nt prapc$dl,
;.Ie ..t~ :",~!oI offe:ini tQ pt'o1ji~e I~-=h colll:'i:;"t1c1'\ .ervices iI"', additiol'\~l City
.a:,~~""'$t:.r.at.~""e cent.ers, il'\ order to put. l....;:,Q ct!ec:, t.."',t!' CCl\m.~"f"iIJ.an.d,.r:.e'd 170.11 of
lQ\ Wt~~~ rcdu~~io~ by ~id-l"1,
~CQ'~ outlined it~ Citr .dmi~istr.tlv<< ~!!~~~. r=cyci~ole~ collection
prQ~e~t'~ '.econ4-year ~.ve cp~="t plan' ~n out 1"1 TAr iTant 'e=tiQ~ on 5-y~&:
p~c1e~tio~s H~ antJeipated ..~1.i2in9 the e!!icien~1 Q! Q~r cen~ral"city 1931
~ollection ro~~a by includinq pCQximal City Cent=ra in th: 1"1 projectls s~cpe
UC~so identitle~ con,i~srable po~~ti.l tQ~ p.tti=ip.~ion i~ yo~r City's Mocel
Office It~cycli~q Prcq~... .nd ~.e!o.~ i. propc,inq 1"2 collection. .t the
nea:by City r~11c Wctks Oper4tioRc Cen~~, the Cityfl B~n Servic=~ Center.
~~d tWQ P~r~1 , ~cre.tlon Dep.r~nt Ce~tcr& do~n~nJ tn. No~~ '.~k C~~~~t
tQr S~rtior.. a~4 th: r.rkv~y Ca==uni~y C4~~r. O~~~n e~l~~en u~in~ the l~t~=r
Co~~~oity Ce~terl. %ec~.~tion.l facilitic. .Ire likdly to !Qentlfy V~~ tnd
pt.c~ic~. of cnviro~.ntally-CQn.ciou$ civic eth~c. ~~d~lled by UCQS~f~ 'tAft Qf
yo~tnt~l (,~ed 17-23) collecticn vQrker~; UCoSD's rol_ of enhancing e=mmur.~ty
'V.1't'e:U:I' of such jo= p-rC'Ipf!ct.& fot' yout.h is .a E"eli~on.$i=.i.lity it take" 'e'ti~!..uly
while provi~ln. eQll=ctio~.
ucosn .Ai~t.i~. i~. cQ~mi~.~t t~ ~yoqr 'i~v's recycl~~9 develQpm~~~
e!fcttl. by 5hdrin, 50~ gf the tevc~~. gen~:A~d tro_ s~lel 01 ~~e r=cyclah~=~
we collect from yeu: offices. CO~S1.t=nt v1th 1"1 County .pprov.l of L~il
revenue-aharinq concept, ~~e UCoSb iRlend~ thAt ~<< j01~t ralationahjp
est.bll~he~ via th. 1911 T~ 9~~nt, .h.ll contin~ in 19'2, and th~ ~ree
'~~c~edinq yeet~. We believe th.t r.vcn~. Qb~.ined by the UCcSD 1o~ yo~
officel' recyclAble., .:iord lhe po~~i~ility of demon~trat.~q thrc~;n
re-i~ve.~nt. our can=ern tor th~ ~e~iptQc~l '~turc 01 cur =nvironmcnt ~r.d the
C'ivic e;.hit='~ gf cur YO\ltJ'l.
U'~~D h~~ f~rther re$ponded tQ ~e C~ty of Ch~l. vi$t.l. pl.n !cr promotl~g
~rea b~~i~e~5e.1 need t~ ~ecycle. by for~lly IitAtin~ our .v~il.bility to
provtd~ recyc1ini collectio~ c.rvice,. Aa yc~~ are. ic iap.cted by County
Qtdi~ances 1.ple-~ntin9 AI '3'. ve .xpe~t ~t ~Iincc.e. vill ~o~.~t the City
~~9~~dinq ~~~o~n~ed altern~tivet to non-cQ.pli.n~e ti~e$ ucoSO will ~e a
vrlco~. tven unique, colleetion prav1der option, given Lhe hiqh volume r~~~r~-
acnt$ .~d ~o,t of .=~~ices by to:-pto~1~ eo~p.n1=~ '1nc~ '0\ Q! all busi~e5!
h.v~ IdS. th.n,2S ~ployeel. .any cau14 not athervi'= be ~..ur.d o! CQntr3et1~i
.ith a cclleetlQ~. pr~vid.t, the UCcSD proPQ.~$ to .e~= $cAl~ b~.~,sel.
l~ter='t i~ i~~ti.~in9 :e~ycli~~ prg~~dure., by oi!eti~9 1"1 ~olle~tJQn' at ~o
~Olt ~~yond the pu~~hac= pri~~ ot on~.ite c~~t~in=r&: ~1=a:1YI lee. tha^ a !l~~
--a~~ in cu:n, lea. ~.an ~e Clty'. cost& ct l~vyi~! finel,
UCcSD will work i~ ccnj~nction wi~ your C,ty'. ~e=y:lin~ ftoj=ctS Deve1o?~
~=r.t $tatt t~ target fot recyclables recovery ~O$C Im.ll cffic=.~ _=rvice a~d
hOI~.t&lity elt.bli,hment&. &1 vell .' liiht ind~&try o~er.t!on" in the vicini~
ot t.he i-bo....e-propos,ed t:1:1'\tral-city 1"1 expIP'\s1.on. ro~tc of uCo:;D C'o"lleC't.\.c1\c t'er
City C-entcr...
UCoSD looks fo~v.rd to yout City 'c~!l'l I~Ppg~t of cur prcpoled 1"2
CQllc:tiQ~~ !ro~ C1~y deplrtments .nd .s.ll bUlinesse. in ~.n~r.l Ch~l. Vista.
exemplityinq A 'caapreh:n$ive cor~1 &:rl~~ !o~ !.~ili~:inq ~ub11C re~y~lini,
which th. W'~$.n Di.qo il ko~ored to upheld.
~
E~~:~t~y~ Olt~~~y~
S....." O~':O u~&-\', C.Opp~ V::
"-3
t., J"e SN1 DIE:::0 ::'~!!t .')~~;'~~ ') )1:1 ';' ~S If.'.
,\ '1'__", ~'...:)r:! ' :'~G.- '- 'il'''~ i .,
I',,; ...:~( r') "I,";Io,~.~",r{ ,.."
-'---.
Attachment B
Commercial and Industrial
Recycling Grants
Recycling Technical Assistance Cover Sheet
o Offices
o Bars/Resl<Jurants
o Grocerics/Hclail
1$ Waste Exchange
~ Innov<JUve
o In House
'--
New
File No.
~
o
Existing
Project Title
( INDWELLER)
Amount Requested
(7000
,
INfrastructure Deal ing with Waste WELL Earth Restoration
Applicant:s Name, Mailing Address, Zip Code
'\~~/\ !\LftKI"J l~S"~ l\(l\--qul'-I Mi.. c...~u..-I-\".~C;II\- CA q\~(1
Applicant's Street Address, if Different from Mailing Address
Name & Title of Person with Daily Responsibility for Project Area Code & Phone No.
Teresa Aland, DBA Hother-A-Land (619) 422-1145
Street Address of Project Site Square Feet - . .
405 Al ta Road, San Die go CA l Q k<<...& <; ~ S\.(;' \: ~ N\S
TyPes of Materials Collected and/or Processed Collection, f ~)
Open Drag-on Recoverable Resources C::=\~l'<:'\' t 'A.T\<.::.......I
Commencement Date Estimated Tonnage Recycled Per Year
(1992) 120,000 tons a year)
Description of Proposed Project (Limited to this Page)
To develop by joint venture a regional facil ity for the rec)'cl ing of
"recoverable resources", The components of the sol id waste stream will be
more properly identified and processed, to provide feedstock to the
. Agricultural Industry and develop appropriate markets.
Pub 1 ic Awareness events and Curriculum development will also be pursued.
Certifica Hon
Under peJalty of perjury, I hereby certify that Applicant has met, or will meet, all federal, state, and local envi-
ronmenta!, affinnative action, and clearinghouse requirements and all other appropriate codes, laws and regula-
tions prior to the expenditure of the grant funds.
\ .
I further certify that Applicant fully understands that the County of San Diego will not assume any responsibility
to ensure compliance with any federal, state or local codes, laws or regulations, but that the County may conduct
an onsite audit and investigation to ensure compliance.
I
,
,
I
Name of Authorized Person
Title
Signature
Date
The following information will be completed by evaluation staff:
Date Application Received
Amount Granted
~"'
Date of Acknowledgement to Applicant
Contract No.
"1284 GranlCovShut
RESOLUTION NO. 11o~'f. L
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE URBAN CORPS OF SAN
DIEGO'S GRANT APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO'S RECYCLING TECHNICAL PROGRAM
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS,
budgeted a total of
Fund to implement
(TAP); and
between 1988 and 1992, San Di ego County
$3.5 million from the Solid Waste Enterprise
the REcycling Technical Assistance Program
WHEREAS, eligible programs are to divert recyclable
material from County landfills; and
WHEREAS, all nongovernmental
obtain a letter of support from the
proposed project will be located; and
grant applicants must
jurisdiction in which the
WHEREAS, the Urban Corps of San Diego, with partial
funding from FY 1990-91 TAP grant funding, currently provides
weekly collection services for the City's Model Office Recycling
Program; and
WHEREAS, under the application to be submitted for this
year's TAP funding cycle, the Urban Corps proposes to continue
offering this collection service, and expand services to include
collection at the Public Works Corporation Yard, two community
centers and one branch library.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the Ci ty of Chula Vista does hereby support the Urban Corps of
San Diego's Grant Application for County of San Diego's Recycling
Technical Assistance Program.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Athena Bradley, Conservation
Coordinator
93l2a
r,A -I
RESOLUTION No.J~!5D
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING TERESA
APPLICATION FOR COUNTY OF
RECYCLING TECHNICAL PROGRAM
OF THE CITY OF
ALAND'S GRANT
SAN DIEGO'S
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS,
budgeted a total of
Fund to implement
(TAP); and
between 1988 and 1992, San Diego County
$3.5 million from the Solid Waste Enterprise
the REcycling Technical Assistance Program
WHEREAS, eligible programs are to divert recyclable
material from County landfills; and
WHEREAS, all nongovernmental
obtain a letter of support from the
proposed project will be located; and
grant applicants must
jurisdiction in which the
WHEREAS, Teresa Aland, Infrastructure Dealing with Waste
Well Earth Restoration (INDEWELLER), is proposing to provide
consulting services for the design of collection and processing
of landscape wastes and create a network through which landscape
and horticultural businesses in the City could divert their
materials for the purposes of mulching and composting; and
WHEREAS, under the application to be submi t ted for this
year's TAP funding cycle, it is proposed to establish a
composting facility to accept materials from area landscapers;
the material would be composted and marketed as soil amendment
feedstock and solid waste "green" materials could be diverted and
converted to viable resources to support a more sustainable
approach to agriculture.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby support Teresa Aland's Grant
Application for County of San Diego's Recycling Technical
Assistance Program.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Athena Bradley, Conservation
Coordinator
~~rq(Q{
D. Richard Rudol sistant
City Attorney
9313a
~6-1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM..:l-
MEETING DATE 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution It.~'" Approving an agreement with the
California State Library for library construction,
grant award number P85-032 under the California
Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
(Proposition 85)
SUBMITTED BY: Library Director ~
(,'i:-'/0
REVIEWED BY: City Manager {.' \ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-1L)
On February 15, 1991 the City of Chu1a vista made final application
for funds available from the California Library Construction and
Renovation Bond Act for the construction of a new library at Orange
and Fourth Avenues. On April 23, 1991 the California Library
Construction and Renovation Bond Board approved State funds in the
amount of $6,747,528 for the South Chula vista Library project,
(grant award P85-032). In June, 1991 the California State Library
mailed the City of Chula vista a draft contract for the award of
funds provided by the California Library Construction and
Renovation Bond Act of 1988. A Council resolution which approves
this agreement is required by the California State Library.
RECOMMENDATION:
resolution.
It is recommended that Council adopt the
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At a joint meeting on September
4, 1991:
The Montgomery Planning Committee voted to approve the original
application (Alternative #1) and get the contract with the State
for the grant money signed and move the project forward with all
deliberate speed.
The Parks and Recreation Commission voted to approve the original
application (Alternative #1), but keep looking forward to
Alternative #2 as the ultimate development plan for the site.
The Library
application
contract.
Alternative
Board of Trustees voted to approve the
(Alternative #1) and move forward with the
Once the contract is signed, move forward
#2 plan at the detailed design stage.
original
original
with the
BACKGROUND
The State Library held an orientation meeting to review the draft
contract on June 17, 1991. David Price, Assistant State Librarian,
Michael Ferguson, State Bond Act Fiscal Officer, City Library staff
and City Finance Department staff were in attendance. The draft
contract was then submitted to Assistant ci ty Attorney, Rich
,. ,
PAGE -2....., ITEM
MEETING DATE 9/24/91
,
Rudolf. His comments returned to the state Library included more
appropriate language and clarification in some sections and a
change from Mayor Pro Tempore to Mayor for the contract
authorization. The state Library sent corrected copies of sections
on which they concurred. The contract, as agreed upon, is
attached. (ATTACHMENT I)
In the meanwhile, the possibility of withdrawing 1.25 acres from
the site to be developed as a recreation center/gymnasium was
explored. The state Library staff indicated this was possible, but
warned it would reduce the grant amount. They also stipulated the
City would have to re-apply, and the new grant would have to be
found competitive. The cost of re-application was estimated at
$15,000.
A joint meeting of the Library Board of Trustees, the Montgomery
Planning Committee and the Parks and Recreation Commission was held
September 4, 1991. (ATTACHMENT II) Although the loss of a site
for a gymnasium was regrettable, the Library Board, Parks and
Recreation commission and Montgomery Planning Committee all agreed
the Library should not reapply and reduce the grant by the removal
of the 1.25 acres. As discussed by staff at this meeting, at least
three other possible gymnasium sites are available, including Loma
Verde, otay and the future otay Valley Regional Park. The minutes
of this Joint meeting are attached (ATTACHMENT III).
The development of the 1.25 acres into a park-like setting with an
outdoor performing arts area and walkways connecting it to grassy
areas under the SDG&E power lines was supported by the Parks and
Recreation Commission and the Library Board. These ideas are
expressed in Alternative #2 (See ATTACHMENT III, section G), as
presented to the Boards and Commissions and to Council in an
information item. Alternative #2 will be pursued during the design
process since it is not inconsistent with the contract with the
State.
DISCUSSION
In order to proceed with the Library project, a resolution
approving the enclosed agreement with the California State Library
for proj ect Number P85-032, the South Chula vista Library, to
receive California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act
Funds is required.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City will receive $6,747,528, the 65% State match of the total
eligible costs ($10,380,812). The remaining 35% ($3,633,284), or
Chula vista's local match, can be partially met by the land
acquisition costs, architectural fees and the geotechnical report
amounting to $1,982,465 already expended. The remainder of the
local matching funds needed can be covered by a combination of the
City's Development Impact Fee share in the project plus DIF
credits.
l''2.
RESOLUTION NO. ''''~S,_
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY FOR LIBRARY
CONSTRUCTION, GRANT AWARD NUMBER P85-032 UNDER
THE CALIFORNIA LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND
RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 1988 (PROPOSITION 85)
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on April 23, 1991 the California Library
Construction and Renovation Bond Board approved State funds in
the amount of $6,747,528 for the South Chula Vista Library
project, grant award P85-032; and
WHEREAS, in June, 1991 the
mailed the City of Chula Vista a draft
funds provided by the California
Renovation Bond Act of 1988; and
California State Library
contract for the award of
Library Construction and
WHEREAS, said contract was reviewed and amended by the
City Attorney's office and resubmitted to the State Library; and
WHEREAS, a joint meeting of the
Trustees, the Montgomery Planning Committee
Recreation Commission was held September 4,
agreement; and
Library
and the
1991 to
Board
Parks
review
of
and
the
WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the Library project, a
resolution approving the contract is necessary to receive the
California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act Funds
required.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approved an Agreement with
the California State Library for library construction, grant
award number P85-032 under the California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988 (Proposition 85), a copy of which
is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the Ci ty of
Chula Vista is hereby directed and authorized to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Rosemary Lane, Library
Director
9306a
"'.3
ST 'Jr:ORNIA
STANDARD AGREEMENT - ~~~~~~~ :~~:AL
STD. 2 (REV. 4-90)
CONTRACT NUMBER
p85-0n
AM. NO.
CONTRACTOR'S FEDERAlI.D. NUMBER
. . 1st July 91
TInS AGREEMENT, made and entered mto rillS day of , 19_,
in the State of California, by and between State of California. through its duly elected or appointed. qualified and acting
TiTlE OF OFFICER ACTING FOR STATE
state Librarian
AGENCY
CA state Library
(
, hereafter called the State, and
CONTRACTOR'S NAME
CrTY OF CHULA VrSTA
,hereafter called the Contractor.
WITNESSETH: That the Contractor for and in consideration of the covenants, conditions, agreements, and stipulations of the State hereinafter expressed,
does hereby agree to furnish to the State services and materials as follows: (Set forth service to be rendered by Contractor, 'amount to be paid Contractor,
time for performance or completion, and anach plans and specifu;ations, if any.)
PER ATTACHED GRANT AWARD
CONTINUED ON
SHEETS, EACH BEARING NAME OF CONTRACTOR AND CONTRACT NUMBER,
The provisions on the reverse side hereof constitute a part of this agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed by the parties hereto. upon the date first above written.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONTRACTOR
AGENCY CONTRACTOR (ff other than an inc/ividuat Bra'" whether a corporation, partnership, etc.)
California state Library City of Chu1a vista
BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE) BY (AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE)
I> I>
PRINTED NAME OF PERSON SIGNING PRINTED NAME AND TiTlE OF PERSON SIGNING
Gary E. strong Tim Nader, Mayor
TiTlE ADDRE~ ,'" s: __~ ~..
state Librarian Chu1a Vista, CA 91910
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS PROGRAM/CATEGORY (CODE AND TiTlE) :~CUND TITLE Department of Genersl Services
DOCUMENT A Library Construction C CRBA Use Only
$6,747,528.00 (OPTIONAL USE)
PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED FOR nd Renovation Bond Act of 1988
THIS CONTRACT
~O- ITEM ~ 5CHAPTER ~rATUTE II FISCAl YEAR
120-621-794001 9/88 988 91/92
TOTAL AMOUNT ENCUMBERED TO
DATE OBJECT OF EXPENDITURE (CODE AND TITlE)
$S, 747 ,528.00 000-701-93999
I hereby certify upon my own personal knowledge that budgeted funds I T.B.A. NO. I B.R.NO.
ars available for the period and purpose of the expenditure stated above.
SIGNATURE OF ACCOUNTING OFFICER I DATE
I>
o CONTRACTOR
o STATE AGENCY
o DEPT. OF GEN. SER.
o CONTROLLER
o
"'5666'
~- ..~'I....._-_. ,..___._.._...__ __....
S~AT 0; CAUFO;;jr,';
STANDARD AGREEMENT
S':D.2'~;;::,V 490)
1. The Contractor agrees In indemnify, defend and save harmless the State, its officers, agents and emplo~ees
from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractor>,
materialmen, lahorers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work ~en:j('es.
material~ or supplies in connection with the performance of this contract, and from any and an claims and
losses accruing or resulting to an)' person, firm or corporation who ma)' be injured or damaged b~ the
Contractor in the performance of this contract.
2. The Contractor, and the agents and employees of Contractor, in the performance of the agreement, shall
act in an independent capacity and not as officers or employees or agents of State of California.
3. The State may termioate this agreementand be relieved ohhe payment of any consideration to Contractor
~hould Contractor fail to perform the covenants her~jn contained at the time and in the manner herein
prO\idcd. In the ",'ent ofsuell termination the State may proceed witb tbe work in an~ manner deemed
proper by tbe State. The cost to the State sball be deducted from any sum due tbe Contractor under this
agrernH:nt. and the balance. if an), shall bt' paid the Contractor upon demand.
4. \Vithout the wriUt'n consent of the State, this agreement is not assignable b~' Contractor either in \\ hole
or in part.
5. Time is of the essence in this agrCt'ment.
6. \:0 dHeration or \'~lriation of the term!ot of this contract shall he ,'alid unless made in writing and signt"d h".
the partit's hereto, and no oral understanding or agreement not incorporated herein, shall be bindin~ on
an:- of the parties herdt).
7. The cnnsidtnnion to oe paid Contractor~ as provided herein, shall be in compensation for all of
Contr:.lc-ror's t'xpensrs iIH:urr('d in the performance hereof, induding travel and per dit'm, uu]t'SS
othen\[se exprts~l! so pro\idcd.
CALIPORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
I
2
AGREEMENT POR LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION GRANT
3
4 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this Pirst day of
5 July, 1991, at Sacramento County, california, by and between the
6 CALIPORNIA STATE LIBRARY, hereafter called the STATE, and the CITY
7 OP CHULA VISTA, hereafter called the GRANT RECIPIENT.
8 DEPINITIONS
9 As used in this agreement, unless the context otherwise indicates
10 or unless specific exception is made:
11
"ACT" means the California Library Construction and
12 Renovation Bond Act of 1988, Education Code Section. 19950 et sea.,
13 and any regulations which implement the ACT.
14 "BOARD" means the California Library Construction and
15 Renovation Board as defined in the ACT.
16 "COMMITTEE" means the California Library Construction and
17 Renovation Finance Committee as defined in the ACT.
18
"ELIGIBLE PROJECT COSTS" are costs authorized in
19
Education Code sections 19957, 19962 (d) and 19963.
The terms
20 "eligible project costs" and "eligible project expenditures" are
21 used synonymously.
1
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD BO: P85-032
1
"FUND" means the California Library Construction and
2 Renovation Fund.
3 "GRANT RECIPIENT" means the legal recipient of California
4 Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act funds.
5 "OSA" means the Office of the state Architect, a Division
6 of the Department of General Services, State of California.
7 "PROJECT" means a new construction or remodeling project
8 for purposes authorized under Education Code Section 19957 and as
9 designated in the GRANT RECIPIENT'S application.
10 "INITIATOR" means a description of a proposed change
11 order together with a request for a cost estimate for the change
12 order, prepared for transmission to the contractor by the project
13 architect or similar official representing the GRANT RECIPIENT.
14 An INITIATOR is sometimes referred to as a "bulletin".
15 "STATE" means the California State Library.
16 "STATE LIBRARIAN" means the duly appointed Director of
17 the California State Library, or his designee, who administers the
18 California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988,
19 and adopts rules, regulations and policies for implementation of
20 the ACT.
21
2
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD .0: P85-032
1
WITnSSETH:
2
3
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually understood and agreed that
4 this agreement is entered into between STATE and the GRANT
5 RECIPIENT and the STATE agrees to make a grant under provisions of
6 the ACT to the GRANT RECIPIENT.
7 The final PROJECT budget as submitted with the GRANT
8 RECIPIENT'S application, and as approved by the BOARD and the GRANT
9 RECIPIENT'S governing body I s resolution, represents the STATE'S 65%
10 funding for six Million Seven Hundred Forty Seven Thousand Five
11 Hundred and Twenty Eight dollars ($6,747,528) and the GRANT
12 RECIPIENT'S 35% local match for Three Million Six Hundred Thirty
13 Three Thousand Two Hundred and Eighty Five dollars ($3,633,285) and
14 local supplemental funds for One Million Two Hundred Three Thousand
15
Two Hundred and Seventeen dollars ($1,203,217).
This grant is
16 being made under the following terms and conditions:
17
A.
That said grant shall be used solely by GRANT RECIPIENT
18 for the purposes of the PROJECT.
19
B.
The application for the PROJECT is attached (Exhibit A)
20 hereto and incorporated herein.
3
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1
C.
GRANT RECIPIENT agrees to start the PROJECT herein
2 described no later than one year from the date of construction as
3 stated in the PROJECT timetable of the application.
4
D.
That GRANT RECIPIENT shall ensure through architectural
5 and engineering supervision, plan checking and inspection of
6 construction work,. that the PROJECT is constructed in accordance
7 with all applicable current State and local statutes, codes and
8 ordinances.
9
E.
That all funds made available for this PROJECT shall be
10 in compliance with the ACT, and regulations under Title 5, Division
11 2, Chapter 1, sections 20410 et. sea. of the Education Code and
12 Title 24, Part 1, sections 16-101 et. sea. of the state Building
13 Code.
14
F.
That any new or existing library book stacks constructed,
15 installed or re-installed as part of this PROJECT, or within one
16 year in the same facility of which the PROJECT is a part, following
17 completion of this PROJECT, shall be done in accordance with plans
18 for which seismic calculations that meet the seismic force
19 requirements of section 11.7. of Table No. 2-23P, of the State
4
CALIFORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD .0: P85-032
1 Building Code (Part 2, Title 24, California Code of Regulations)
2 and certified by a structural engineer licensed by the state of
3 california.
4
G.
That all library services provided as a result of the
5 funds made available for this PROJECT shall be available free of
6 charge and without discrimination to all members of the community,
7 district or region served by GRANT RECIPIENT, and that said
8 building and any land acquired with bond act funds will be devoted
9 exclusively to public library purposes for 20 years, or the useful
10 life of the building, whichever is longer.
11
H.
That all construction contracts shall be awarded on the
12 basis of open competitive bidding, in conformance with the Local
13 Agency Public Contracts Act, Public Contract Code Sections 20100
14 et. sea..
15
I.
That prevailing wage rates are complied with pursuant to
16 Labor Code Section 1770 et. sea.. Copies of the prevailing rates
17 may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial
18 Relations. Copies of the prevailing rates are also on file with
19 the California State Library, Bond Act Fiscal Officer, and will be
20 made available to any interested party on request.
5
CALIPORNIA STATE LIBRARY
Ca1irornia Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD 50: P85-032
1
J.
That the PROJECT is to be designed to comply with
2 provisions of the Uniform Building Code (Part 2, Chapter 33,
3 section 3301 (3) and all relevant parts of the State Building Code
4 (Title 24, Part 2, California Code of Regulations) for facilities
5
accessible to, and usable by, the physically handicapped.
All
6 library facilities shall display in a prominent place the
7 international symbol of access to the handicapped.
8
It.
That during construction the PROJECT shall display a job
9 sign predominantly stating the words "Constructed with funds
10 provided by the California state Library under authority of the
11 California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of 1988".
12 The sign shall be placed in a prominent location viewed by the
13 public.
14
L.
That after completion of the PROJECT a permanent plaque
15 shall be displayed predominantly stating the words "Constructed
16 with funds provided by the California state Library under authority
17 of the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act of
18 1988". The plaque in the completed building will indicate the date
19 of completion of the PROJECT and shall be placed in a prominent
20 location viewed by the public.
21
6
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P8S-032
1
PROJECT CRABGES
Any change in the scope of the PROJECT made by the GRANT
2
A.
3 RECIPIENT subsequent to the approval of the PROJECT by the BOARD,
4 shall be submitted, with supporting documentation, to the STATE
5 LIBRARIAN to determine if it significantly changes the PROJECT
6
information provided during the application process.
The STATE
7 LIBRARIAN shall have the sole authority to determine if a change
8 is significant, thus requiring the STATE LIBRARIAN's approval. If
9 the change is not approved by the STATE LIBRARIAN, the GRANT
10 RECIPIENT may appeal the STATE LIBRARIAN'. decision to the BOARD.
11 The decision of the BOARD regarding a change in the PROJECT is
12 final and binding.
13
B.
Following local award of the construction contract for
14 the PROJECT, the GRANT RECIPIENT shall submit to the STATE
15 LIBRARIAN a copy of each INITIATOR, regardless of its nature, no
16 later than the same time it is forwarded to the contractor.
17 The STATE LIBRARIAN shall, within three working days of
18 receipt of the INITIATOR, review all INITIATORS that is issued as
19 change orders would:
20
1.
Affect library operations, including but not
21 limited to work that affects the location or number of any
7
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1 bookstacks, storage shelving, doorways or direction of swing of
2 doors, paths of travel and circulation, access to any library
3
equipment, materials and services, or use of spaces.
Any such
4 initiators shall be accompanied by a statement by the local library
5 director describing how the change will be accommodated in the
6 operational program following completion of the construction; or,
7
2.
Change the scope of the PROJECT, including the
8 PROJECT budget if the change would reduce the local contribution
9 to the PROJECT.
10
C.
Upon receipt of any INITIATOR requiring review in
11 accordance with the preceding subsection, the STATE LIBRARIAN
12 shall:
13
1.
Approve the change order; or,
14
2.
Return the INITIATOR for resubmission, for a
15 specified reason, in which case the resubmission will be reviewed
16 within three days of its receipt; or
17
3.
Notify the submitter than an additional period
18 not to exceed five days will be required to gather specified
19 additional information. No further additional time shall be taken
20 for this reason.
8
CALIFORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library Construotion
and Renovation Bond Aot of 1988
GRANT AWARD HO: P85-032
1
D.
If the STATB LIBRARIAN does not act in accordance with
2 the preceding subsection, the change order may be issued as
3 submitted.
4
B.
All other change orders may be issued without the STATB
5 LIBRARIAN's approval.
6
F.
Any changes to the project budget shall be approved by
7 the state Librarian, or designee, through a Budget Change Request
8 (Exhibit B).
9
1.
The amount of funding to be provided by the STATB
10 to the GRANT RECIPIENT shall not be increased. Any actual changes
11 which increase PROJECT costs shall be the full responsibility of
12 the GRANT RECIPIENT.
13
14
PAYMENTS
15
A.
Said Grant shall be payable on a reimbursement basis:
16
1.
Prior to payment for land and/or building credits,
17 The GRANT RECIPIENT provides evidence that the State's interest in
18 the building, and the land, if the land is owned by the GRANT
19 RECIPIENT, has been recorded in the title record; and if,
20
(a> The purchase price of the land is part of the
21 eligible cost of the PROJECT, the GRANT RECIPIENT shall provide
9
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1 documentation acceptable to the STATE LIBRARIAN demonstrating proof
;, vI Li". purchase price paid for the land. The GRANT RECIPIENT will
3 then provide a final title report subsequent to the title transfer
4 that demonstrates the GRANT RECIPIENT holds marketable record to
5 the land which is acceptable to the STATE LIBRARIAN; and,
6
(b) The title record for land shall specify the
7 STATE'S interest by recording that the land shall be used to
8 provide direct public library service for twenty years following
9 the completion date of the PROJECT or the useful life of the
10 library building in place upon it, whichever is longer, as
~~ speci~ied in Education Code section 19967; or
12
(c) Since STATE grant funds will be provided by
13 the BOARD for the construction of a library facility, the GRANT
14 RECIPIENT shall record in the title record the STATE'S interest in
15 the building upon completion of the PROJECT; and,
16
(d) The title record for the building shall specify
17 the STATE'S interest by recording that the library facility shall
18 be used to provide direct public library service for twenty years
19
10
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1 following the completion date of the project or the useful life of
2 the building, whichever is longer, as specified in Education Code
3 section 19967.
4
2.
Prior to payment for furnishings credit, the GRANT
5 RECIPIENT shall certify that all furniture purchases will have an
6 estimated useful life of not less than 10 years.
7
B.
Payments shall be made no more frequently than on a
8 monthly basis. Payment requests shall state that the reimbursement
9 request is being made only for eligible project costs. Payment
10 requests shall be submitted, in triplicate, with an original
11 signature of the GRANT RECIPIENT'S fiscal officer, or that
12 officer's designated agent, affixed to an original copy of the
13
payment request no later than the 15th of each month.
Payment
14 requests shall be submitted on a form (Exhibit C) as prescribed by
15 the STATE LIBRARIAN. Payment by STATE will be made within 60 days
16
of receipt of Invoice.
Failure by GRANT RECIPIENT to submit
17 invoice in the prescribed time may result in an additional payment
18 delay of up to 30 days.
19
1.
One-half of one percent (.5%) of the total PROJECT
20 cost (excluding land) is the State project administration fee per
21 Section 16-401 (b) of the State Building Code (Part 1, Title 24,
11
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1'88
GRANT AWARD BO: P85-032
1 California Code of Regulations). This administration fee will be
2 deducted in full from the GRANT RECIPIENT'S first payment request
3 and any subsequent payment requests until such fee is collected in
4 full.
5
2.
Payment requests, in triplicate, should be mailed
6 to
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1.4
MR. MICHAEL L. PERGUSON
BOND ACT FISCAL OFFICER
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
P.O. BOX 942837
SACRAMENTO, CA 94237-0001
(916) 445-8216
C.
In the event that the amount of funding which is provided
15 is greater than the cost of the project, the GRANT RECIPIENT shall
16 return that portion of the funding which exceeds the cost of the
17 PROJECT to the STATE LIBRARIAN.
18
D.
GRANT RECIPIENT agrees that any STATE bond funds provided
19 for this PROJECT which are not used: or are diverted from the
20 purpose set forth above: or are not satisfactorily accounted for,
21 shall be repaid to STATE within ninety (90) days after it is
22 determined that the funds are not used, diverted or not properly
23 accounted for.
24
B.
Without limiting any other contractual remedies available
25 to the STATE for breach of this agreement, the GRANT RECIPIENT
12
CALIPORNIA STATB LIBRARY
Calirornia Li~rary Construction
and aenovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P8S-032
1 agrees to make restitution to the STATB for any cost incurred by
2 the GRANT RECIPIBNT and paid with bond funds which are not
3 allowable under applicable state statutes, rules, regulations,
4 policies and procedures, or the terms of this agreement.
5
6
PAYMENT RETBNTION
7
A.
The STATB shall withhold 10% from each payment request
8 which will be paid when all of the following have been completed:
9
1.
All eligible project costs have been expended; and,
The GRANT RECIPIBNT certifies, by providing a
10
2.
11 compliance letter from the local building official, that the
12 building has been completed in accordance with the approved plans
13 and specifications, including the installation of bookstacks,
14 funded by state and local matching funds; and,
15
3.
The GRANT RECIPIBNT shows evidence of having
16 recorded a "Notice of Completion" for which the lien period has
17 expired and for which all outstanding liens have been settled; and,
18
4.
The GRANT RECIPIBNT shows evidence of the building
19 title having been accepted by the GRANT RECIPIBNT.
20
B.
The GRANT RECIPIBNT must notify and obtain approval from
21 the STATB LIBRARIAN before the GRANT RECIPIBNT transfers title of
13
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
Calirornia Li~rary Construction
and Renovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD MO: P85-032
1 the building or land to an agency other than the GRANT RECIPIENT
2 within 20 years or useful life, whichever is longer.
3
C.
The GRANT RECIPIENT s~mits a final fiscal and program
4 compliance audit of eligible PROJECT funds performed by an
5 independent certified Public Accountant (CPA) utilizing Generally
6 Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), to be s~mitted to the STATE
7 LIBRARIAN by the GRANT RECIPIENT.
8
9
AUDIT REOUIREMENTS
10
A.
This agreement is s~ject to the examination and audit
11 of the state of California Office of the Auditor General,
12 Department of Finance and Office of the state Controller for a
13 period of three years after final payment has been made.
14
B.
The GRANT RECIPIENT s~mits a final fiscal and program
15 compliance audit of eligible PROJECT funds performed by an
16 independent certified Public Accountant (CPA) utilizing Generally
17 Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP), to be submitted to the STATE
18 LIBRARIAN by the GRANT RECIPIENT. The cost of the audit will be
19 the responsibility of the GRANT RECIPIENT.
20
C.
For purposes of project monitoring and audit, GRANT
21 RECIPIENT will make the following available: records maintained
14
CALIPORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1'88
GRANT AWARD 50: P85-032
1 for the PROJBCT, including but not limited to, payrolls on file,
2
change
orders,
Budget Change Requests and payments
to
3 contractor(s). GRANT RECIPIBBT shall also make available whatever
4
the STATB LIBRARIAN
deems necessary in order to review the
5 performance, prosecution and progress of work by the contractor(s)
6 and to determine compliance with the terms of the contract by
7
contractor.
This shall include, but not be limited to on-site
8 inspection of the construction work, review of records maintained,
9 confirmation of payroll status of construction workers, review of
10 payments to contractors, and reporting of percentage of work paid
11 with percentage of work accomplished.
12
13 RECORDS RETBBTION
14 GRANT RECIPIBBT will retain on file all fiscal records supporting
15 expenditures under this Agreement for twenty (20) years after
16 completion of the PROJBCT, or until notified by the STATB LIBRARIAN
17 that audit requirements of the STATB have been met, whichever is
18 sooner.
19
20
15
CALIPORNIA STATE LIBRARY
Calirornia Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1
PROJECT MONITOR
2
STATE LIBRARIAN will monitor the PROJECT.
OSA will assist the
3 STATE LIBRARIAN in the inspection of construction and shall serve
4 as a designated representative thereof. All recommendations made
5 by OSA concerning the PROJECT shall be transmitted to the GRANT
6 RECIPIENT by only the STATE LIBRARIAN.
7
8
PROJECT REVIEW
9
A.
GRANT RECIPIENT shall submit to STATE LIBRARIAN for
10 approval, prior to bid, the following:
11
1. A current PROJECT budget.
12
2. Schematic designs and outline specifications.
13
3. Preliminary plans and specifications (also known as
14 100% design development documents).
15
4.
Working drawings and specifications and contract
16 language (also known as construction documents or contract
17
documents).
This submission shall be prior to the local plan
18 check.
19
16
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1
5.
Any revisions to the approved set of schematic
2 designs, preliminary plans, or any revisions to the approved set
3 of working drawings, specifications and contract clauses, including
4 any resulting from the local plan check if they affect library
5 operations or project scope.
6
6.
A PROJECT which, at the time of approval of the
7 application by the BOARD, has completed any of the design documents
8 outlined above, shall after approval of the application submit the
9 building program and the most current set of design documents to
10 the STATE LIBRARIAN for the required review. Earlier versions need
11 not be submitted.
12
B.
The STATE LIBRARIAN shall review and approve building
13 programs, schematic designs, outline specifications and the current
14 project budget to ensure that:
15
1.
The schematic designs and outline specifications
16 appropriately interpret the building program, provide functional
17 arrangements and a practical design.
18
2.
The current PROJECT budget is appropriate to the
19 approved program and to the schematic designs and outline
20 specifications.
17
CALXFORNXA STATE LXBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1
C.
The STATE LXBRARXAH shall review and approve preliminary
2 plans and specifications and the current PROJECT budget to ensure
3 that:
4
1.
The preliminary plans carry out the approved
5 schematic design concepts without significant change.
6
2.
The support systems are appropriate to meet program
7 requirements, accessible and reasonably laid out.
8
3.
There are no obvious code compliance problems.
9
4.
The current PROJECT budget is appropriate to the
10 approved program and to the preliminary designs.
11
D.
The STATE LIBRARXAH shall review and approve working
12 drawings and specifications, the current PROJECT budget, and
13 contract language to ensure that:
14
1.
The systems and design are compatible with the
15 programmatic needs of the library and the requirements of the state
16 Building Code.
17
2.
The design reflects prudent principles of public
18 works buildings design and good construction practice.
19
3.
The systems in the design documents are well
20 coordinated.
18
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
Calirornia Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
1
4.
The current PROJECT budget is appropriate to the
2 approved program and to the working drawing designs.
3
5.
The construction contract provides for all relevant
4 requirements of the ACT and of the regulations adopted under
5 authority of Education Code section 19960, and of the PROJECT
6 documents.
7
8
RESOLUTION OF DISPUTES
9
A.
If the GRANT RECIPIENT and the STATE LIBRARIAN cannot
10 agree on disposition of state Building Code (Part 1, Title 24,
11 C.C.R.) comments by the STATE LIBRARIAN at any of the reviews by
12 the STATE LIBRARIAN, the STATE LIBRARIAN shall provide to the GRANT
13 RECIPIENT a list of three experts qualified in the appropriate
14 discipline. The experts shall not have previously been involved
15 with the PROJECT. The GRANT RECIPIENT shall choose one of them to
16 decide the issue, and shall pay the expert's costs and customary
17 fees. The expert's decision shall be binding on both parties.
18
1.
If the issue relates to State Building Code
19 interpretation, its disposition shall use the jurisdiction's local
20 code appeals process.
21
19
CALIFORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1'88
GRANT AWARD BO: P85-032
2
A.
LIMITS OP LIABILITY
Neither party shall be liable to the other nor be deemed
1
3 to be in breach of this agreement for failure or delay in rendering
4 performance arising out of causes factually beyond its control and
5 without its fault or negligence. Such causes may include, but are
6
not limited to:
Acts of GOD or the public enemy, wars, fires,
7 floods, epidemics, quarantine restrictions, strikes, unforeseen
8 freight embargoes or unusually severe weather, provided that the
9 party whose performance is affected notifies the other within
10 five (5) days from the cause to inform of the existence and nature
11 of delay.
12
B.
It is understood and agreed by all parties that since the
13 performance dates of this agreement are of the essence and
14 importance to the implementation of the ACT, continued failure to
15 perform for periods aggregating ninety (90) or more calendar days,
16 shall afford the BOARD the right to terminate this agreement and
17 GRANT RECIPIBBT shall return that portion of funding which exceeds
18 the cost of the PROJBCT at the time of termination to the STATB
19 LIBRARIAN.
20
20
CALXPORNXA STATB LXBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD 50: P85-032
1
C.
GRANT RECXPXEKT indemnifies and holds harmless the BOARD,
2 the STATB and their officers, employees and agents from any and all
3 liability, claims, loss, damages, costs or expenses, from all
4 claims relating to:
5
1.
Labor performed or furnished and materials used or
6 employed for the work as set forth in Exhibit A of this agreement;
7 and,
8
2.
Injuries to any person, corporation, real or
9 tangible personal property, received or sustained by or from the
10 GRANT RECXPIEKT and its employees or sub-contractors and their
11 employees in doing the work, or in consequence of any improper
12 materials, im~lements or labor used or employed therein, as set
13 forth in Exhibit A of this agreement; and,
14
3.
Any act, omission or neglect of the GRANT RECXPXEKT
15 or its employees; and,
16
4.
Violations of any California Environmental Quality
17 Act (CEQA) codes or regulations.
18
19 POLXTXCAL ACTXVXTY
20 No funds received under the ACT shall be used for any partisan
21 political activity or to further the election or defeat of any
21
CALXFORNXA STATB LXBRARY
ca1irornia Li~rary Construction
and Renovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD 50: P85-032
1 candidate for public office: nor shall they be used to provide
2 services, or for the employment or assignment of personnel in a
3 manner inconsistent with state laws or regulations prohibiting
4 political patronage.
5
6 CONTRACTOR BVALUATXON
7 The GRANT RECXPXBNT's performance under this agreement shall be
8
evaluated
within
thirty
(30)
days
after
completion.
9 Contract/Contractor Evaluation Form (std. Form 4) will be completed
10 by the state Library and shall remain on file for a period of
11
thirty-six (36) months.
If the GRANT RECIPIBNT did not
12 satisfactorily perform the work or services specified in the
13 contract, the state Library shall place one copy of the evaluation
14 form in the contract file and send one copy of the form to the
15 Department of General Services within five (5) working days of the
16
completion of the evaluation.
Upon filing an unsatisfactory
17 evaluation with the Department of General Service, the state
18 Library shall notify and send a copy of the evaluation to the GRANT
19 RECIPIBNT within fifteen (15) days. The GRANT RECIPIBNT shall have
20 thirty (30) days to prepare and send statements to the state
21 Library and the Department of General Services defending the GRANT
22
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and aenovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD RO: P85-032
I RECIPIENT' s performance under the contract. The GRANT RECIPIENT' s
2 statement shall be filed with the evaluation in the state Library's
3 file and in the Department of General Services.
4
5 FORCE AND EFFECT OF CONTRACT
6 This agreement shall be of no force or effect until it shall have
7 been approved by the STATE LIBRARIAN, GRANT RECIPIENT and the
8 DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA.
23
CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
Calirornia Li~rary Construction
and aenovation Bond Act or 1988
GRANT AWARD NO: P85-032
ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN:
Exhibit A. Grant application approved by the BOARD on April
23, 1991, will serve as Exhibit A of this agreement for the purpose
of defining the scope of this PROJECT. The application includes
a PROJECT budget. GRANT RECIPIENT shall be reimbursed for 65% of
eligible costs incurred under this agreement in accordance with the
PROJECT budget.
Exhibit B. Budget Change Request form shall be submitted, in
duplicate, to the STATE LIBRARIAN for approval when a change to the
PROJECT budget is requested.
Exhibit C. Payment Request form as prescribed by the STATE
LIBRARIAN. All payment requests shall be submitted, in triplicate,
on this form.
Exhibit D. statement of Compliance certifying GRANT RECIPIENT
has complied with specific nondiscrimination program requirements.
Exhibit E. Nondiscrimination clause which the GRANT RECIPIENT
must comply with regarding issues of nondiscrimination.
Exhibi t F.
RECIPIENT,
workplace.
Drug-free Workplace Certification which the GRANT
by doing specific things, will provide a drug-free
24
,
I ~
3
I ~
6
I ~
9
10
I 11
12
13
1 14
15
16
17
l 18
19
20
21
I;;
24
2S
26
27
I~
30
I 31
32
33
34
I~
37
I~
40
I 41
42
43
44
I 45
46
47
I:
50
I 51
52
53
I 54
55
56
57
[58
..~
I
,
APPLICATION
FOR
CALIFORNIA LmRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT FIDo'DS
APPEi""DIX 2 cro SecIloD 20420 (c))
Administered by the California State Library: Gary E. Stron&. CaliComia Stale librarian
The application shall be received by the Bond Act Fiscal Officer, or that officer's designee, at the rpllow1ng
location by 3 p.m. on February 15, 1991 or July 19, 1991. .
CoJUonalo S.... Ub...,
Ub..., .. Co_ BIIikIIDc
FIocoI Some.. . Itoom 215
". CapUol Mall
SOC......DIo, CoJUonalo '5I1~7
Tbe applicant local jurisdiction punuant to the Education Code, DUe 1. DiviaioD I, Part 11, Oaapter 11, Sections 19950.19981 and
1iUe S, DrMion 2, Chapter I, Sections 20410-20426 or tbe California Code of RqulatioDl, hereby applies for a .tale matchini I"Inl
for the conltruction or rcmodclinc of the public library facility dc:aaibed berein;
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECf: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
TIPE OF APPliCANT: ~ City: IKI
County: 0
City/County: 0
District: 0
N/A
Joinl Powers Agreement (JPA): ~
(U applicable. lpecify Dimeo or portieo)
GRANT APPliCANT: ~ CITY OF CHULA V I STA
l.q:aJ name DC jurisdiction that will own buildin&
Elected Official: ~ LEONARD M. MOORE
Mayor, Chairpcnon of Board of Supervisors, Head or Special District, authorized to aie" tbe application
Title: ~
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
(619) 691-5044
Phone: ~
Address: ~
276 FOURTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910
For JPA Projects Only
U applicatioD io by a JP A applicaDt, provide tbe elected official or Ibe ac:cond pony.
Elected Official: ~ N/ A
Mayor, ChairpenoD or Board or Supervioo", Hcad or Special Diotria, autborized 10 lire Ibe applicalioD
Tide: ~
Address: ~
UMIT COMMEi"'TS mROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE . UMIT mE
SIZE TO NO SMALLER THA'1 It POI"'T5, AND U PITCH (ELITE) WITH NO MORE THA'1 , UN&!; PER INCH.
ATrACHMEi"'TS SHALL NOT BE ACCD'TED UNLESS REQUIRED BY REGULATION OR r.... 11"n FOR ON THE APPUCATlOS
FORM. CLEARLY UJlEL ALL SUPPORTING DOCUMEi"'TS SUBMI'ITED WITH mE APPUCATlON WITH THE NAME OF
mE APPUCAA'T AA"D PROJECT.
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11/1190)
I'
I 2
3
4
I ~
7
I :
10
I 11
12
13
114
15
16
l 17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
I 31
32
33
I~
36
I~
39
I~
42
I~
45
46
I 47
48
49
150
51
52
I 53
54
55
[56
L
ROSEMARY LANE
Project Coordinator: .
Title: .
Name or iDdMdual who will hive adminislntivc control OYer the project ror the local juril.diction.
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
(619) 691-5167
Phone: .
365 "F" STREET
Address: .
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
DAVID J. PALMER
Alternate Contact Person: .
(U the project coordinator is unavailable, the mnLlct penon &hall be authori2.c:d 10 act in tbe capacity or tbe project coordinator.)
Title: .
ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR
(619) 691-5170
Phone: .
365 "F" STREET
Address: .
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
Head oCPlanning Department:. ROBERT A. LEITER
(If JP A, !'""'ide Head of Planninl Depanmenl for jurisdiction providinllhe ",!Vice. U applicable. Special Distnc.. exempt)
Title: .
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
(619) 691-5101
Phone: .
276 FOURTH AVENUE
Address: .
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
Head of Public Works Department:. JOHN P. L I PP IT
(U applicable. U JPA, provide for jurildietion providinllhe sc:rvice.)
Title: .
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
(619) 691-5294
Phone: .
707 "F" STREET
Address: .
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT:. SOUTH CHULA V I STA LI BRARY
Page 2
CSLoBA FOR-\! Z (1I11J9O)
I
I i
4
I ~
7
I~
10
( 11
12
13
(14
15
16
17
(18
19
20
I 21
22
23
I~
26
I~
29
I 30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
( 43
.44
45
I~
48
\.49
50
51
I ;;
54
I 55
I
UBRARY JURISDlCI'ION: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Ubral)' Director Name: ~
ROSEMARY LANE
l.q:al name of library that will opcn(e the service ~n the buildin&
Title: ~
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
Address: ~ ,6s "F" STREET
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
Alternate Contact Penon: ~
DAVID PALMER
(619) 691-5170
Title: ~
ASSISTANT LIBRARY DIRECTOR
365 "F" STREET
Address: ~
Phone: ~
Pbone: ~
(619) 691-5167
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
(If applicable)
RAYMOND M. HOLT & ASSOCIATES
Ubral}' Building Consultant: ~
Title: ~
LIBRARY BUILDING CONSULTANT
Address: ~ P.O. BOX 74S
DEL MAR. CALIFORNIA 92014
Architect: ~
WHEELER, WIMER, BLACKMAN
(providiD& construction budeel estimate Iz. oonceptuat plans)
Title: ~
VICE PRESIDENT
Address: ~ 8989 RIO SAN DIEGO. SUITE 250
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
Phone: ~
Ucense if: ~
Phone: ~
(619) 755-7878
CA 13630
(619) 296-9922
Interior Designer: ~ MARSHALL BROWN - I NTER I OR DES I GNER, I NC.
(If applicable)
Title: ~
PRESIDENT
Address: ~ 3230 FIFTH AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92103
Phone: ~
(619) 291-2171
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 3
CSL-BA FORM 2 (111l19O)
I ~
3
I:
6
l:
10
[11
12
13
t 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2S
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
'36
37
38
, 39
I
1.40
41
I 42
;43
'44
,45
'46
, 47
48
I 49
.50
51
. 52
CHANGES IN PROJECf INFORMATION
Were there any changes in the proposed project information from that provided during the pre-application
or a previous application?
Yes [!] No 0
If so, were changes made in any of the following?
Project Square Footage ...................................... Yes 0 No 1[1
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes 0 No []
Distance to Nearest Existing Public Library. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes 0 No ED
Square Miles in Project Service Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes 0 No []
Library Project's Service Area 1990 Population ...................... Yes ill No 0
Library Project's Service Area 2010 Population ...................... Yes @ No 0
Age of existing public library building ............................ Yes 0 No ~
Date of most recent renovation or expansion of
existing public library building ............................ Yes 0 No []
Electronic Information Delivery Units ............................ Yes IIJ No 0
Meeting Room Space. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yes 0 No Ii]
Project Budget ............................................ Yes [!] No 0
Needs Assessment .......................................... Yes III No 0
Changing Concepts in Library Service ............................ Yes ill No 0
(This information will be utilized by the State Library to update the project database created from
information previously provided during the pre-application or an earlier application.)
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 4
CSL-BA FORM 2 (lI/lI9O)
I l'
2 1YPE OF PUBLIC UBRARY PROJECf & GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE
3
4 1YPE OF PROJECT:
I 5 GROSS PROJECT SOUARE FOOTAGE
6 35,000
7 A) New Building . SF
I 8 N/A
9 B) Addition . SF
10 8<
[11 Remodeling . N/A SF
12 Of Existing Library Bldg. for:
13
I 14 Energy Conservation YesD NoD
15 Disabled Access YesD NoD
I 16 Health & Safety YesD NoD
17
18 C) Conversion . N/A SF
I 19 (Acquisition of . Buildina: to conven
20 into. public libnry building)
21 8<
22 Remodeling
I 23 Of Building for:
24
2S Energy Conservation YesD NoD
I 26 Disabled Access YesD NoD
27 Health & Safety YesD NoD
I 28
29 D) Remodeling of ExIsting library Building for. . N/A SF
30
I 31 Energy Conservation YesD NoD
32 Disabled Access Yes D No D
33 Health & Safety YesD NoD
I 34 N/A
3S E) Remodeling for Shelving 8< Built.in Equipment: . SF
36 (For projecl> wilh Ihis activity only)
l~
39 MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS:
l~ Is the project also a multipurpose building? Yes D No ~
42 Specify other uses of multipurpose building: . N/A
I~
~
I 49 CURRENT GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE:
50
51 The eurrent gross square footage of the existing public library{s) being replaced is:
I 52
.53 . 2.~70 SF
C4 (t! Ihere is no _line racility, enler "0")
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
omcIAL NAME OF PROJECT: . Paae 5
t CSt.-BA FORM 2 (111t19O)
I ~
3
I ~
6
7
I ~
10
(11
12
13
( 14
15
16
17
I 18
19
20
I 21
22
23
I~
26
I~
29
30
I 31
32
33
I~
36
I~
39
40
I 41
42
43
I~
46
I~
49
SO
I;~
53
I~
56
I 57
PROJECI' PLANNING INFORMATION
UBRARY FAC1UTIES MASTER PLAN:
STANDARD METROPOUTAN STATISTlCAL AREA (SMSA):
Is the proposed site for the project located in a Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area (SMSA)?
Yesm NoD
DISTANCE TO NEAREST EXISTING PUBliC LIBRARY FACllJTY:
(For ~ ollbia cliatance dctamiJIalioa oaJy, . 'public libnry fac:ility" lDeaIII . bui1din, or 1,400 oquare reel or 1D0re
providin, direcl public lib~ oeM"".)
Number of miles to the nearest existing public library faciliry other than the library faciliry(s) being replaced
by the proposed project:
2.2
Miles
.
(ptoYide mileace 10 the bc:arcst l/lOtb of . mile by drMnltbe diltaac::e in In automobile from the prop>>cd aite to the
_real public libnllY facility, .....rdl... or "bat jwiadi<tiOD lb. public libnry iI Joc:a.od in.)
Name of Nearest Public Library Faciliry: . OTAY MESA BRANCH, SAN 0 I EGO PUBL I C LIBRARY
10,000
Square Footage of Nearest Public Library Faciliry:
SF
.
NUMBER OF SQUARE MILES IN THE PROJECT SERVICE AREA:
Number of square miles in the project service area:
8.5
SQ Miles
.
RELATIONSHIP OF PROJECT TO NEIGHBORING PUBliC LIBRARY FACIUTIES:
Deaaibe baw lb. propoaod facility rela'" to Dei,bOOrin, _,in, .nd propoaod public libnry fadliti... 1(. fac:ili'i.. master
plan e:OIL&, reference appropriate pais ill the repon to luppon ILltemen1s:
Section 10.8 of the Chula Vista Public Library Master Plan calls for the re-
placement of the two small branch libraries located in the southern portion
of the City. Originally operated by San Diego County Library, the City of
Chula Vista took over operations of these facilities in 1989. After con-
struction of the South Chula Vista Library, it is the intention to close the
Castle Park/Otay Library which is located in 1,720 SF of leased space. How-
ever, Library and City officials both agree that closing the 602 SF Woodlawn
Park Library would be politically insensitive. The Woodlawn Park Library,
located in the Community Center of a geographically isolated, lower inceme,
African-American neighborhood, will continue operations as a satellite of
the South Chula Vista Library.
The San Diego Public Library operates the 10,000 SF Otay Mesa branch 2.2
miles south of the site of the South Chula Vista Library. across a natural
barrier, a river valley, and City boundary. That facility is designed to
meet the needs of the immediate San Diego neighborhood and does not have the
capabilities to serve the 59,545 existing residents of south Chula Vista. In
fact, the Library's circulation figures show that 15.737 registered patrons
come from the south San Diego area.
If the applicant has completed or updated a jurisdiction-wide library facilities master plan within the last
5 years, the document shall be submitted witb the application.
OffiCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 6
CSL-BA FORM Z (11!1J9O)
I ~
3
I 1
6
I ~
10
(11
.12
13
I 14
15
16
l17
18
19
20
I;;
23
I~
26
I~
29
30
I 31
32
33
I~
36
I~
39
40
I 41
42
43
I~
46
I~
49
50
I ~~
53
I ~~
S6
157
(
NEeDS ASSESSMENT FOR THE UBRARY PROJECT:
UBRARY PROJECI"S SERVICE AREA 1990 POPULATION: ~
59.545
UBRARY PROJECI"S SERVICE AREA :clIO POPULATION: ~
85,723
AGE OF THE EXISTING PUBUC UBRARY:
When was tbe existing public library building. wbich will be replaced or improved by tbe proposed
project, initially built?
~
1921
YeJlr
(If proposed project MIl replace mon: than one buildin" liat the oldest or tbe buildinp.)
(If then: is no _line facility. eu'er 'V')
CONDmON OF mE EXISTING PUBUC UBRARY:
When was the most recent structural renovation or expansion of tbe existing public libral)' building?
NONE
Year
~
(If proPJSCd project will replace more than one buUdinc, lilt the mcxt recent" activity for Iny of tbe buildinp.)
(If then: iJ DO _line facility. euter 'V')
PHYSICAL FACIUTY UMITATIONS:
Provide statements of deficiencies of the existing public library facility(s) for the foHowing:
(If mon: than one facility, complete this section for each facility separately. i.e.,lubmit two copies of this: section of the form.)
Structural: LITERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND 1 S STREET
There are no major structural problems in this leased house
used by the Chula Vista Library team to tutor adults who are
functionally il literate. The house is seventy years old.
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECI': ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 7
CSL-BA FOR.\! 1 (tl/IJII())
1
I
4
I
7
I
10
r
13
C
17
L
20
I
Z3
I'
26
r
b.
JO
L
\3
I
\6
r
.9
(
~3
I
16
r
~9
I:
;3
I
.
:6
I
I
NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR THE UBRARY PROJECT:
UBRARY PROJECI"S SERVICE AREA 1m POPULATION:. 59.545
UBRARY PROJECI"S SERVICE AREA 2010 POPULATION:. 85.723
AGE OF THE EXISTING PUBUC UBRARY:
Wben was the existing public library building. which will be replaced or improved by the proposed
project, initially built?
.
1974
Year
.
(U propooed project wi1I replace more than on. buildin&. IiII th. oldesl or lb. buildinp,)
(U there II DO c:mliD& facility. enler "0")
CONDmON OF THE EXISTING PUBUC UBRARY:
Wben was the most recent structural renovation or expansion of the existing public library building?
.
NONE
Year
(U pmpoaed project will replace more OWl one buiJdin,. list the mo.l recent act.iviry for any of tbe buildinp.)
(U there II .0 c:mlin& facility. enler "0")
PHYSICAL FACILITY UMlTATIONS:
Provide statements of deficiencies of the existing public library faciliry(s) for the following:
(If more than ODe facility. aJmplete thia section for each facility aepanucly, i.e., submit I'NO copies of this section of the form.)
Structural: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY. 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
There are no major structural problems to this 1.720 sq. ft. leased facility.
There is a minor roof leak.
omclAL NAME OF PROJECI':. SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Paee 7
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11/1190)
I ~
3
I ~
6
I ~
10
111
12
13
(14
IS
16
17
l 18
19
20
I 21
22
23
I~
l6
27
I~
30
I ;1
~2
33
14
I~
37
I~
40
Iu
12
43
44
I~
47
I~
50
I ~1
i2
53
54
I. is
.';6
57
(i8
Electrical Power & Data Distribution: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
Wiring is inadequate for learning lab terminals.
Ughting (natural & electrical): LITERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND I S STREET
Adequate.
Mechanical (HVAC): LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
Adequate.
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 8
CSL-BA FORM Z (ItJ1J9O)
1
l
4
I
1
L
l
14
I,
17
r
.0
'1
L
!4
I
!7
1-
;()
I:
4
I.
,7
r
~
(
r
7
I
o
l
[
7
I
I
Electrical Power & Data Distribution: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY. 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
* The number of electrical outlets are inadequate. An added power pole
augments the number of electrical outlets near the circulation desk
but cannot accommodate all the needs. Extension cords are taken under
the circulation desk and present safety hazards.
* Future public online catalog terminals will need more outlets.
I.JghtJng (natural & electrical): CASTLE PARK LI BRARY. 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Adequate.
Mec:hanical(HVAC): CASTLE PARK LIBRARY. 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Adequate.
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 8
CSL-BA FOIIM % I1V1J11!1\
I ~
3 Energy Conservation: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANOIS STREET
I 45
Single pane glass is not energy conserving. Glassed in front porch
6 used as office has heat loss in winter and heat gain in summer.
I :
10
I 11
12
13
114
15
16
l17
18
19
20
1 21
22
23 Health & Sarety: LI TERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND I S STREET
1 2524
* No smoke alarm or sprinklers are provided.
26
27 * There is a trip hazard due to settling at edge of the parking lot in
128 the rear of the bui lding.
29
30
I 31
32
33
34
I 35
36
37
I 38
39
40
I 41
42
43 Disabled Access: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
44
145 * Stairs at front and rear entrances preclude handicapped access.
.46 No ramps are provided.
47
148 * Restrooms are no large enough for handicapped.
49
SO
\ 51
52
53
54
I 55
-56
57
\58
1
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page ,
CSLo-BA FORM 2 (1111190)
I ;
3
4
I ~
7
f :
10
I 11
12
13
14
I 15
16
17
I 18
19
20
I~
24
I~
27
I;:
30
31
I 32
33
34
I~
37
I~
40
41
I 42
43
44
I~
47
I~
50
51
I 52
53
54
I 55
. 56
57
I 58
I
Ene"iY Conservation: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY. 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Acceptable. There are no north, south or west facing windows. Store-
front windows to the east have an overhang.
Health & Safety: CASTLE PARK L' BRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
* There are no smoke alarm or sprinkler systems.
* The pub I ic restroom is too small for a wheelchair bound person to
use.
* The night lighting is inadequate in the parking lot especially since
the next door convenience store draws a lot of night customers.
Disabled Access: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Wheelchairs cannot enter building over high curb from parking lot.
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
PaKe !I
CSL-BA FOR.'\! 2 (1111190)
I ~
3
I ~
6
I ~
10
I 11
12
13
114
15
16
l17
18
19
20
I 21
22
23
I~
26
27
I~
30
I 31
32
33
34
I 35
36
37
I~
40
I 41
42
43
44
I 45
46
47
I:
50
I 51
52
53
154
55
56
57
( 58
L
Acoustics: LI TERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LANO I S STREET
Adequate.
Space Flexlbility/Expandability: LI TERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND I S STREET
The space is not flexible because it has fixed walls and installations
that define a residence, i.e. bedrooms, kitchen, bathrooms. Lot
restrictions do not make the house expandable.
Functional Spatial Relationships: LITERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND I S STREET
Poor. Some of the needed tutoring spaces are not separated enough from
the ringing telephones and conversations related to the office. The
literacy library is in a tutoring room so it -~ unavailable when the
room is in use.
Site: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
Settl ing problem in parking lot.
Other/General:
Engineering, Energy & Asbestos Studies:
If the existing library facility will be remodeled, or if an existing building will be converted into a library
building. provide a copy of an engineering study and an asbestos survey with supporting cost figures. If the
existing facility will be remodeled for energy conservation, pro\ide a copy of an energy audit with supporting
cost figures.
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
OmCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
Page 10
CSL-BA FORM 2 (1111190)
I
3
(
b
7
(
10
P
13
(J
C
20
,
i;
, .
Z3
..
i
~
"
I.
L,.
~
I
13
["
I
!6
,7
I"
~
L
~3
I
16
(
;0
I~
3
I
6
r
I
Acoustics: CASTLE PARK LI BRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Adequate because of carpeting.
Space FlexlbilitylExpandability: CASTLE PARK LI BRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
The 1,720 sq. ft. is flexible with no fixed wal Is except for restrooms.
The space is not expandable unless an adjacent rental space could be
acquired by lease agreement.
Functional Spatial Relationships: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
Adequate relationships for public use. The only staff work space is
not connected to the public service desk and is without a door so the
public can view staff on a break.
SI~: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 THIRD AVENUE
The parking lot, shared by three tenants, has inadequate lighting.
Other/General:
Engineering, Energy & Asbestos Studies:
IT the existing library facility will be remodeled, or if an existing building will be converted into a library
building, provide a copy of an engineering study and an asbestos survey with supporting cost figures. If the
existing facility will be remodeled for energy conservation, provide a copy of an energy audit with supporting
cost figures.
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 10
1
I 2
3
4
I S
6
7
I 8
9
10
11
I 12
13
14
I 15
]6
17
I 18
19
20
2]
I 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
3]
32
33
34
I 3S
36
37
38
I 39
40
4]
I 42
43
44
I 45
46
47
48
I 49
50
5]
I 52
53
54
I S5
56
57
58
SERVICE UMITATIONS:
Provide a statement of space deficiencies of the existing public library facility(s):
(ll more than ODe f.cility. complele tbis section for each facility aeparatcly, i.e., lubmit two copies of this leC1ion of the form.)
Collections: LI TERACY TEAM OFF I CE, 210 LAND I S STREET
The Chula Vista Literacy Team currently has 4,500 volumes of instructional
and resource materials. The Team has identified the need for an ultimate
collection of 6,000 items which the current rented bungalow of 850 square
feet cannot accomodate. The existing collection is divided between two
former bedrooms which are used as tutoring space. This results in there
being no logical shelving sequence for the materials and much of the
collection is inaccessible much of the time whenever tutoring is in ses-
5 ion.
Readers'Seating: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
The Literacy Team bungalow can only accomodate four tutor/learner pairs
at anyone time. Since this does not nearly begin to accomodate the
over 100 matched pairs which need tutoring space, the Team is forced to
sol icit donated tutoring space. Because this space is frequently not
forthcoming, an average of 5-8 tutor/learner pairs are on hold at any
given time waiting for tutoring space to become available. The need to
find more space also means that the Team Coordinator must spend as much
as 15% of her time each month attempting to locate free tutoring locations.
The new South Chula Vista Library will include 16 tutoring stations in
the Literacy Center.
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 11
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11/\190)
1
I
4
(
L
11
I i
14
(J
U
21
I:
24
r~
27
C
31
L
34
I
37
[
[
w
I
J7
r
)0
I:
i4
I.
i7
I
I
-SERVICE UMITATIONS:
Provide a statement of space deficiencies of the existing public library facility{s):
(If JDOI'O IIwI 000 faciliry, c:omplOlO Ibis lOOtioa tor ..ch faciJiry sepanotoly, i.e., submit two copies DC Ibis lOCtiOD of tho Corm.)
Collections: CASTLE PARK LI BRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
The Castle Park Library has 14,943 volumes, while the Woodlawn Park Library
has 7,201 volumes. The collection at these two branches totals only .37
books per capita for the residents of South Chula Vista. This is far below
the City/Library standard of 3 books per capita. Space at both libraries
is totally allocated and there is no room for future collection growth.
Castle Park's 735 linear feet of shelving is at the bursting point. In
some sections every new book means that an older title must be transferred
or discarded. The Castle Park collection is heavily used, even with the
limitations of size, number of readers' seats, and parking. It's annual
turn-over rate of 3.6 compares favorably to the turn-over rate of 4.5 at
the Library at 365 F Street. Greatest patron demand is placed on juveni Ie
and spanish language materials. However, lack of space prevents increasing
the size of these collections, which constitute over 85% of the branch
ci rculation. The adult noOn-fiction collection, numbering only 2,978 items
is not large enough to meet the needs of secondary students or adults
attempting to find solutions to daily problems. The small reference col-
lection and the lack of any periodical back files often means that patrons
must travel to the F Street Library to complete their work. The lack of
adequate floor space near the door means that a book theft detection
system cannot be instal led, making the collection vulnerable to theft.
Readers'Seating: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 THIRD AVENUE
The Castle Park Library has only four lounge chairs, three four-passenger
adult tables, and one four-passenger children's table for a total of 20
readers' seats. After school gets out of session at 2:00 PM there are
frequently as many as 6 to 8 students that must do their homework sitting
on the floor because there are no available seats.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 11
CSL-BA FORM % (I tJtJ!IO)
I 1
2
3
4
I 5
6
7
I 8
9
10
I 11
12
13
14
I 15
16
17
I 18
19
20
I 21
22
23
24
I 25
26
27
I 28
29
30
I 31
32
33
34
I 35
36
37
I 38
39
40
I 41
42
43
44
I 45
46
47
48
49
50
51
I 52
53
54
I 55
56
57
I 58
I
StalTOffices, Workstations & Supenision: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
The Literacy Team office is located in an 850 square foot rented bungalow
where space is inefficiently designed for use as an office. The Coordina-
tor's office is the former front porch. Not only is it poorly insulated,
it is also the site of the bungalow's front door. This means the Coordina-
tor has no privacy in which to interview perspective tutors, evaluate
learners, make appropriate matches of tutors to learners, or do neces-
sary paperwork. The Team's reception area is in the former I iving room and
there is room for only one desk which must be shared by 14 staff members
and volunteers.
Special Purpose Units: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
The Literacy Team currently has room for only 2 public access computers
at the bungalow. Both PCs are in the middle of the former living room
(reception area) which results in users having no privacy. Because of
the demand to use PCs in the course of literacy training, arrangements
have been made to util ize the Chula Vista Adult School's Computer Lab.
However, this lab is available only two nights a week and effective
utilization of the lab requires the Coordinator to be away from the
office on many evenings.
As there is no room for additional equipment at the Team's office, no plans
have been made for an OPAC at this facility, making access to the resource
collection and other appropriate library materials extremely difficult.
Also, there is no room for a new PC which was recently given to the Team
and it will have to be located off site, further compounding logistical
and coordination problems.
Meeting Room Seating: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
There is no meeting room space at the bungalow. The lack of meeting
room space has meant that the monthly tutor training sessions must be
held off site. Likewise, all inservice workshops for staff and volunteers
must be held away from the Team's office. Because of the logistical
problems only four inservices have been held during the past year.
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
OrnCIAL NAME OF PROJECf: .
Page 12
CSLoB... FORM 2 (11JlJ9O)
H
3
I ~
7
I ~
10
I 11
12
13
14
I 15
16
17
118
19
20
I 21
22
23
24
I~
27
I~
30
I 31
32
33
34
I~
37
138
~9
40
141
42
43
44
I~
47
I~
50
151
52
53
54
I 55
56
57
[ 58
L
Starr Omces, Workstations .& Supenision: CASTLE PARK LI BRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
The Castle Park Library has one public desk which is the Library's sole
book return, check-out/check-in, and reference desk service point for
the public. The desk must also serve as the only workstation for three
staff members. In order to be used for both functions the desk must
accomodate two PCs, one printer, a telephone and FAX machine, a calculator,
a pencil sharpener, as well as space for circulation and ILL forms, four
date due guns, necessary supplies, and some desk-top signage relating
to circulation rules. Since there are not enough electrical outlets for
all the equipment, power strips and power poles have been added. The
result is a tangle of cords which is cumbersome and occasionally dangerous.
The branch has created a non-public space of approximately 65 square feet
by arranging book stacks to create an alcove. Since the space is not an
enclosed room it does not provide much privacy. Nevertheless, it is used
as the staff lounge, storage for bulky and desireable equipment such as
the TV monitor and VCR, backroom storage for 503 videotapes, plus
storage for additional supp1 ies.
Special Purpose Units: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
The Castle Park Library has a public photocopier and in the Spring of
1991 wi 11 receive two OPAC terminals. There is no space for any additional
electronic information delivery units. The lack of microform reader-
printers and accompanying back runs of periodicals on microform is an
especially acute problem.. Anyone needing to do more than the most basic
research must travel to the Library at 365 F Street and compete with
sometimes over 500 patrons using that facil ity at any given moment.
Meeting Room Seating: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 TH I RD AVENUE
There is no designed meeting room space at the Castle Park Library.
Story hours are accomodated only by moving furniture from the center of
the library. Since story hours attract over 90 children per session,
use of the 1,]20 square foot facility for other purposes (such as studying,
reading the newspaper, even browsing) is severly limited, if not impos-
sible during the hour. Because of local demand, the Library has offered
VITA tax assistance, but since there is no meeting room all consultations
must occur at one of the tables in public view and earshot. Only one
adult program has been held at the branch in the last two years due to
lack of appropriate space.
omClAL NAME OF PROJEcr: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 12
CSL-BA FORM 2 (111l19O)
I ~
3
4
I ~
7
I :
10
(11
12
13
14
(15
16
17
I 18
19
20
I 21
22
23
24
I~
27
I~
30
I 31
32
33
34
35
36
37
[~
40
41
I 42
43
44
I 45
.46
47
I~
50
51
I S2
53
54
I SS
S6
57
I S8
L
Types of Services for which space is Jacking: LITERACY TEAM OFFICE, 210 LANDIS STREET
The Chula Vista Literacy Team must carefully control the size of its
program and monitor the number of tutors and learners because of the
lack of tutoring sites at its home office. Because of the lack of
meeting room space tutor training must be held off site, away from
the resource collection, electronic del ivery units, and support staff.
The fact that the bungalow is a rented space has contributed to some
of the perceptions that the service is a temporary one and its location
away from the public library has prevented its overall integration into
the Library's service plan.
Describe the degree to which citizens, community organizations and local agencies panicipated in the
detennination of the need for a new/improved facility: LITERACY TEAM OFF I CE,
210 LANDIS STREET
The Chula Vista Literacy Team is a joint project of the Altrusa Club of
Chula Vista, the Chula Vista Adult School, and the Chula Vista Public
Library. The Altrusa Club, a business and professional women's service
organization with 25 members, has made literacy and the Literacy Team its
primary commitment. As the original founders of the Team, they have
campaigned long and hard for permanent, larger quarters. Their efforts
have been supported by the Sweetwater Union School District, the Chula
Vista City School District, by Rohr Industries (the region's only Fortune
500 company) and by the Library Board of Trustees.
If helpful in demonstrating the facility limitations, provide photographs or a video tape of the existing
library building(s) as suppon documentation. Label all photographs or video tapes with name of applicant
and project. This submittal is optional.
If the applicant has completed or updated a jurisdiction-wide or project specific library needs assessment
within the last 5 years, the document shall be submitted with the application.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 13
CSLoB" FOR."! Z (1!/!190)
1
2-
3
4
S
I ~
8
9
I ]0
]1
]2
113
]4
]5
I ]6
]7
]E;
19
I 20
"21
22
23
24
25
26
27
:u
29
130
, 31
32
I 33
I~
35
1%
~7
3S
39
I ~D
II
42
I~
45
I~
4E:
<19
L~
S2
t ~
55
~6
I~~
!
i
'Jype5 of Ser.icc.s for which space is Jackinl!: CASTLE PARK LIBRARY, 1592 THI RD AVENUE
At 1,720 square feet, the Castle Park library can only provide the most
basic level of public services. lack of space results in a collection
that by design must be primarily popular and browsing in nature. lack of
space means that even this goal cannot be satisfactorily met since there
is no room for audiocassettes or compact discs. lack of space means that
reference needs go almost entirely unmet due to the small size of the non-
fiction collection and the inability to provide electronic delivery units.
lack of space means that additional staff cannot be provided to assist the
public, provide programs, or deliver outreach. lack of space results in
only one story hour for a community with 5,000 children under the aqe of
5. lack of space means few bilingual services to a population that is
that is almost 37% Hispanic. lack of space prevents any group from using
the library for meeting purposes. lack of space means no cultural or
educational displays. With only 1,720 square feet at the Castle Park
library, lack of space means that the present per capita ratio of library
space in the services area will remain at .04 square feet. lack of space
ultimately means that the Chula Vista Public library will never be able
to adequately meet the needs of 59,545 existing residents of South Chula
Vista, not to mention the thousands that will come in the future.
Describe the dep"~ to which citium, communi!)' orgznwtions and local agencies panicipated ir. the
determination of the n~ for a nev.'fimproved facili!)':CASTlE PARK liBRARY, 1952 TH I RD AVE
On December 31, 1985, the City of Chula Vista annexed the former Montgomery
Fire District and instantly acquired 23,3000 new residents in South
Chula Vista. The Montgomery Planning Committee, a citizens' advisory
board a~pointed by the City Council, has lobbied strongly for a library
as the focal point of their nel': com,,,unity identity. A total of five
community srou~s has been involved in over 100 meetings in arriving at
the concept of the South Chula Vista library. These are the library
Master Plan Committee, the Site Selection Committee, the Montgomery
Planning Co~mittee, the library Board of Trustees, and the Chula Vista
2000 Task Force, a citizens strategic planning group. The latter held
a publ ic meet ing outl ining 44 proposed civic improvements. Two hundred
citizens voted and new libraries took the top two spots. Three documents
support the need for new libraries: The Chula Vista Public library
Master Plan, (.L,pril 1987); Site Selection for T..'o Nel" Public Libr"ries,
(January 1988); and Summary Report of Chula Vista 2000 Community Task
Force (Apri I 1990).
If belpfuJ in demonstrating the faciJil)' limitations, prO\ide rhotol!Taphs or a ,ideo tape of the existinE
libral)" building(s} as suppon documentation, Label all photol!Taphs or video tapes ",itt, name of applicant
and proj&1. This submitta! is optional.
If the applicant has completed or updated a jurildiction-"'ide or proj~ specific libral)' nee<1s assC.lsment
"'ithin the last S )'e.ars, the document shall be submitted ",ith the application.
OmCL4.L t\AM[ OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHUlA VISTA liBRARY
Page 13
CSL,.BA FORM Z (l1Il!90)
I
4
I
7
t
r
14
I~
r
!1
I
!4
r
!7
[
!1
l
!4
r
17
[
11
L
14
t
17
[
[
i4
1
;7
I
[
IJ]IRARY BUILDING PROGRAM:
For new construction, conversion and addition/renovation projects, a final building program document shall
be submitted with the application. The library building program shall meet the requirements shown in
Appendix 3.
Demographics:
BrieOy desaibe how the propcRd library project will meet the Deeda of the JeI'Yic:e area population bued OD the cOstin&: and
projOCled delDoC1"'phie chancteriltico, inc1udinc. bul DOl limited 10 flcton IUcII .. "ce, Bee, etbnicity, educalion Ind
JOCio-ecoDOmiC conaidentions:
The South Chula Vista Library service area consists of the nine south-
ern census tracts in the City. SANDAG (San Diego Association of Government)
estimates that the 1990 population of the service area is 59.545 and will
grow by 44.0% to 85.723 by 2010.
Ethnic groups traditionally defined as minorities are on the verge
of constituting a majority within the service area. While whites make up
51.1% of the total population, Asians comprise 9.0%, and Hispanics a dramatic
36.7%. The percentage of Hispanic residents is higher than local, state, or
national patterns:
% of Hispanics
Serv i ce Area
36.7%
Chula Vista
25%
Cal if.
24.8%
USA
12.6%
S.D. Co
19.9%
Analysis of enrollment at schools within the service area provides an even
more tell ing picture of a bi-cultural mix. In the six elementary schools
and six secondary schools nearest the library site, Hispanic students are
in the majority. In addition, the elementary school district reports that
just over 25.3% of the children in the schools nearest the library site
speak either no English or very I imited English. In comparison, district
wide figures show that only 13.9% of total enrollment speaks I imited or
no Engl ish.
In terms of age, the service area is demographically similar to the
rest of the city. county, state, and nation. However, the elementary school
district reports that it considers the area immediately surrounding the
library site to be of a very low socio-economic level. They indicate that
based on the Cal ifornia Assessment Program, students at the six schools
have a rating of 1.66 on a scale of 1.0 to 3.0. This means that 80% of all
California schools have higher socio-economic levels. Further, the school
district reports that 42.5% of the students come from skil led or semi-
skilled households and 43.8% come from households classed as unskil led.
The demographics show that Chula Vista has a unique opportunity to
create a major library facility dedicated to a bi-national, bi-cultural
perspective. To meet these needs the Library will insure a relevant mix
of resources and services with a special emphasis on providing Spanish speak-
ing staff and having 30% of the collection in Spanish. The Library sees a
special obligation to help new immigrants residing in the community transi-
tion as needed, into American society/culture and possibly into American
citizenship. On the other hand the Library intends to provide Anglos with
the opportunity to better understand and appreciate Hispanic culture, history
and language. The Library will be a vital component in linking two cultures
and creating a vibrant community.
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 14
CSL-BA FOR-\! Z (11l1J9O)
I 1
2
3
I 4
5
6
I 7
8
9
10
I 1]
12
13
I 14
15
16
l 17
18
19
20
I 2]
22
23
24
2S
26
27
28
29
30
I 3]
32
33
I 34
35
36
I 37
38
39
40
I 4]
42
43
I 44
45
46
I 47
4S
49
50
I 51
52
53
I 54
55
56'
I
I.
Changing Con~pt5 In Public IJbraT)" Seni~:
De.cribc bow lb. propooed project will respcnd 10 chlnfinl oonoepu in public libraI)' servioe:
Located four miles from the Mexican border, the South Chula Vista Library will
be a facility conceived and dedicated to a bi-national, bi-cultural, concept of
library service. The prominent location of the library, adequate parking, and a
design that incorporates the best elements of contemporary Mexican architecture will
signal a new era in I ibrary service for the residents of the newly annexed area. A
bi-lingual staff will greet visitors, extending an invitation to uSe the resources
of the I ibrary. Patrons will have access to the latest media and electronic infor-
mation resources, as we I 1 as a materials collection ultimately numbering 178,000
items, 30% of which wil I be in Spanish.
A special commitment wil I be made by the library to help residents with practi-
cal solutions to daily problems. A trained staff of professionals will not only
utilize the bi-lingual materials collection, but will also use computer and CD-ROM
databases to help those wishing to improve job skills, develop career ladders, or
advance their education. As the home of the Chula Vista Literacy Team the library
will also provide one-on-one assistance to those wishing to improve their reading
and writing skills. A six station computer-interactive video lab will provide free
and convenient access to PCs and allow many in the community to become computer
literate. FAX machines and dial-up access to the Library's automated catalog, will
insure swift delivery of information, especially for businesses, industries, and the
border region maquiladoras (twin manufacturing plants). Much of the activity will
occur in the Technology User's Center, which can aptly be described as the nerve
center for public access to electronic information.
Children will benefit enormously by their ability to easily access the out-
standing collections and services which have long been a hallmark of the Library.
The children's area will be of a unique design, melding the best of children's lit-
erature with the most useful AV, computer, and CD-ROM technology. A story time area
will provide a special place for the bilingual staff to assist the mostly Spanish
speaking children with English language skills.
Similarly, young adults wil I enjoy an attractive browsing area of their own
with collections recognizing current youth interests and presented in a variety of
languages matching the area's ethnic diversity. Besides AV materials, the YA area
will have a video kiosk to present informational and entertainment videos.
Youth of all ages wi II benefit from the relationship between the South Chula
Vista Library and the Olympic Training Center to be built in the City. Programs
and field trips will highlight sports as a viable alternative to drugs and gangs,
Meeting room facilities will include a 100 seat multipurpose room with tele-
conferencing capabilities, a twenty five seat conference room, and three group
study rooms. An exhibition hall will provide space for the library to present
quality displays of contemporary Mexican and American arts, crafts, archeological
artifacts, plus educational and informational displays from such sources as the
Centro Cultural in Tijuana, the Smithsonian and local museums. In addition, a
Friends of the Library run books hop will include a 12 seat cafe off the exhibit hall
where patrons can enjoy the displays or read a book while sipping a cup of coffee.
The creation of the South Chula Vista Library will be a unique opportunity to
draw from the rich cultural heritage of the large Hispanic-American population re-
siding in the service area. This objective will drive the building of relevant
collections and services which will be networked on regional, state, and inter-
national levels and significantly benefit bi-cultural communities throughout the
state.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 15
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11Jl19O)
(
[
9
I:
13
I'
16
r
20
[
24
[
28
1
31
r
3S
[
39
[
$3
L
$7
I
50
[
54
[
58
[
52
r
):)
56
I
I
Buildina Components Allocation for the Proposed library Project:
Provide a summa!)' oC the propoocd project', holdinp at capacity II rclIcctcd in the lib",!)' buildinC prol"'m, by proYidin& the propoocd alloca.ions
Cor the CoIIawinC lib"'!)' build.nc componenu:
Coll<<titlns
Books
Adult .............................................. ~
Fiction ......................................... ~
Non-Fiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Reference ....................................... ~
Special .. (.L.I!~~.:-~~). . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Young Adult (if applicable) ................................ ~
Children. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
EasylPicture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Juvenile ........................................ ~
Fiction .................................... ~
Non-Fiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Reference .................................. ~
Total Books ........................................... ~
Audi~Visual
Video Tapes .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Compact Discs ......................................... ~
Audio Cassette Tapes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Phonodiscs ............................................ ~
Talking Books . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Computer Software ...................................... ~
Other (slides, photographs, realia etc.) . J!~"I~~A.C:r.IY~. YI.~E.o)....... ~
Total Audio- Visual Materials ............................... ~
Periodicals Titles
Adult .............................................. ~
Number of VolslUnits
106,317
32,666
61,180
6,471
6,000
4,000
54,844
19,790
'35.054
13,152
21.311
591
165.161
6.500
2,300
3,150
tVA
?OO
75
20
12,245
Number of titles
240
Young Adult (if applicable) ................................ ~ 30
Children. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~ 30 .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
Page 16
CSL-BA FORM Z (1 tI1I9O)
(
(
{
c
C
I:
C
22
I.
2S
I
28
I
31
I
34
I
~7
I
W
t
~3
t
16
I
19
I
;2
I
L
Readen' Sealin!!
Number or Seats
General Book Collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
54
62
28
Adult Reference Services. . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Browsing Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Young Adults (if applicable) ............................................ .
16
47
Children's Services ..............................................,.... .
Periodicals Services. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .PART OF BROWS I NG
. . (TECHNOLOGY USERS CENTER) 20
Spcctal CollectIons ................................................... .
Other (Miscellaneous) . J ~~~S). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 12
Staff Workstations:
Number or
Public Service
Workstations
Number or
OILWorkroom
Workstations
Circulation ............................ .
4
6
.
Adult Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
2
.
10
Children's ............................. .
2
6
.
Young Adult (if applicable) ................. .
N/A
.
N/A
Special Collections ....................... .
N/A
.
N/A
Administration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
.
Technical Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
N/A
.
N/A
Custodial . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
TECHNICAL USERS'
Other (Specify CENTER ). . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Other(Specify LI TE RA C Y ) ............... .
N/A
N/A
N/A
Extension ............................. .
.
.
.
N/A
.
4
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Palle 17
CSL-BA FORM % (1Il119O)
L
3
I
(
Sl1eCial Puf110se Unils
(providc for both ltaff ..d public usc.)
Computer Terminals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
6
CD-ROM Readers ................................................... .
9
I ~
12
I ;
15
l~
18
I ~
21
I:
24
I :
27
I:
30
I:
33
/.
36
I
39
r
42
1:
~
L
~9
I
52
I
I
Microcomputers ..................................................... .
Minicomputers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Computer Printers ................................................... .
Microform Readers and ReaderlPrinters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Microform Cabinets .................................................. .
LateraINertical Files. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Photocopy Machines .................................................. .
Facsimile Machines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
A V ListeninglViewing Stations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Map Files ......................................................... .
Atlas Cases ........................................................ .
Card Catalog Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
Workstations for the Disabled (TDD' etc.) .................................. .
Other(Specify: TYPEWR ITERS )..... . . .. .. . .. .. .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... .
I NTERACTI VE
Other (Specify: v 1 n~n ) ........................................ .
· Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD)
Electronic Information Delivery Units: (public use units only.)
Number of Units
]9
15
30
N/A
11
8
6
12
5
2
7
2
N/A
9
2
For the purposes of this section, 'electronic information delivery units" means computer terminals, CD-ROM readers,
microcomputers, computer printers, photocopy machines, facsimile machines, minicomputers, audio-visual listening or
viewing units, microform readers and reader/printers. TDD units. downlink satellite dishes, and CATV monitor/tuners
dedicated for the use of the public.
Number of electronic information delivery units dedicated to public use to be housed in the proposed project, and
specified in the project's building program and furnishings and equipment budget:
.
61
Units
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
Page 18
CSL-IIA FOR.\! 2 (111t19O)
I
3
I
5
I
10
l
13
I
16
(
'0
l
r
r
:.0
r
)1
r
r
,/
r
f
,~
(
,7
I
o
I
3
(
L
QJ!.k T.lnisWlI ProtJUCtioll CaDabililits I
Describe Ibe cable television production capabilitiCl of Ibe proposed projCCl (uplink diab, cable cbanne~ produClion Iludio e,,):
The South Chula Vista Library will provide limited production with camcorder/
editing capabilities.
MeerillP SlKlCt (prcMde for I\lff Ind public uac)
Number of Seats
Community Meeting Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
100
Conference Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . .. .
2~
Quiet Study Space ................................................... .
16
Literacy Training Space . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .
39
Staff Training Space .................................................. .
N/A
Administrative Conference Space ......................................... .
8
Children's Story Hour Space ............................................ .
80
Multipurpose Space .................................................. .
N/A
Theatres .......................................................... .
N/A
Other (Specify
EXH I B IT HALL
) ....................................
N/A
Other (Specify
) ....................................
Other (Specify
) ....................................
Meeting Spaa: (public _ IpaCC only.)
For purposes of this section, .meeting space. means community meeting space, conference space, quiet study space,
literacy training space, children's story hour space, theatres, and multipurpose space dedicated for the use of the public.
Number of square feet of meeting space dedicated to public use to be housed in the proposed project, and specified
in the project's building program:
.
4,880
SQ,FT,
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Paae l'
CSL-IIA FOR.\! 2 (t1/1I9O)
I
2
I
6
I
9
[
t:
16
I
19
h
[
26
I
19
r
32
r
!6
l
19
I
12
[
[
19
I.
i2
[
.5
r
L
Semce &< Space Conversion Standards and Guidelines:
, PrDYide information recarding any atandard& or guidelines utilized in the building program for the following, The use of atanclardl or
,uidelines ia DOl mandatory, but if used, provide the c:oavenion facton for the (oUowin&:
CoUections
Provide and cite tbe source for any ltandard or auidcline used, lucb AI units per capita, unita per aquan: fool, CIC.:
The Chula Vista Public library Master Plan and the City of Chula Vista
General Plan call for three books per capita. The library interprets
books to mean hardcover/paperback books, videotapes, audio cassettes,
records, compact discs, periodical, and newspaper titles.
Books
The library Master Plan provides the square footage conversion formulas.
Videotapes
Audio Cassettes
Compact Discs
Talking Books
Interactive
Videos
Newspapers 1.5 sf/title .5 title/If
Reader's Seals Pe r i od i ca I s 1. 5 sf/ tit I e 1 tit I e/ I f
Provide aDd cite tbe source for any standard or pidclinc UICd, such u reader's seats per capita or per 1,000 people. CIC.:
The library Master Plan calls for .0075 reader's seats per square foot.
The library's seating square foot conversion factors are derived from the
library Master Plan, and recommendations of library consultants and from
professional library design books.
lounge Chairs
Carrels
4-Person Tables (Adult)
2-Person Tables (Adult)
4-Person Table (Juvenile)
Electronic workstations (PCs, CD-ROM)
Audio-visual
Reference
Adult Fiction
J F i c t ion
Adult Non-Fiction
J Non-Fiction
Picture Books
large Print
Paperbacks
li te racy
Periodicals
Square Footage
10 vols/sf
15 vols/sf
20 vols/sf
15 vols/sf
20 vols/sf
30 vols/sf
10 vols/sf
20 vols/sf
50 vols/sf
linea r Footage
6 vols!1f
8 vols!1f
14 vols/lf
8 vols/lf
14 vols/lf
24 vols/lf
8 vols/if'
14 vols/lf
35 vols/lf
20
30
30
13
20
vols/sf
vols/sf
vols/sf
vols/sf
vols/sf
vols/lf
vols/lf
vols/lf
vols/lf
vols/lf
8
14
24
10
20
35 sf
35 sf
100 sf
50 sf
80 sf
45 sf
Sfaff Workstations
Provide and cite tbe IOUI'Ce for any standard 01" cuideline used, such U Dumber of staff or ltaff wotbtatiOnl per capita or per 1,000, clC.:
The Chula Vista Public library Master Plan outlines staffing guidelines:
1 Publ ic services librarian/5,000-7,500 residents
1 Clerical support person/5 librarians
1 Circulation staff member/60,000-75,OOO circulations
1 Shelver/70,OOo-80,OOO circulations.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 20
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11111!10)
I
I
5
I
~
r
12
[
16
t
19
I
!2
[
r
!9
I
\2
[
[
19
I
~2
[
~S
[
19
l
;2
I
,S
r
I.
SaUllf'r Foota'lt
If national (e.g. Wheeler & Goldhor or ALA 1962) or local quantitative space conversion standards were utilized to
p'lan this project, specify the level and cite the source:
. .5 to .7 SF I Capita Source:. CHULA V I STA PUBLI C LI BRARY MASTER PLAN
If the library faciliry is nOl being planned to provide at least .s square foot per capita, explain why this is not
necessary to meet the local service needs of the project's projected population:
The Chula Vista City Council on April 30, 1987 "approved the concept of .5 to .7
sq. ft. as an adequate planning standard for future library services in the City
of Chula Vista." The Montgomery/Otay Planning area, as outlined in the original
Master Plan, gave a current population of just over 50,000 persons with little
growth potential. In order to simplify, the Library arbitrarily multiplied .7
sq. ft. per capita, the higher end of the sq. ft. scale, by 50,000 population and
in the subsequent four years campaigned for a 35,000 sq. ft. building. Commit-
ments to this size building were made by the Site Selection Committee, in the
Negative Declaration, by the Montgomery Planning Committee and the Chula Vista
2000 Task Force in their many public meetings. When the South Chula Vista Library
service area was adjusted to include a portion of the "Eastern Territories", total
service area population also grew. The 35,000 sq. ft. South Chula Vista Library
will provide the 1990 estimated population of 59,545 with .59 sq. ft. of library
per capita. This falls to .41 by the year 2010 when the service area population is
estimated to grow to 85,723. However, the site can accommodate a 10,000 sq. ft.
addition which would raise the 2010 sq. ft. per capita to .52. In addition, the
.5 to .7 range was always intended to be a City-wide standard. Therefore, the
current 55.000 sq. ft. library at 365 F Street, coupled with the 35,000 sq. ft.
South Chula Vista Library, and two planned libraries in the far eastern portion
of the City will raise the total overall City per capita rate to well over .5
in 2010.
If the proposed project's square footage becomes inadequate to effectively serve the population of the
service area within twenty years, what is the current plan to meet the library facility needs of the service area?
The proposed project identifies an expansion of 10,000 GSF. This increase in
building square footages will displace a portion of the east parking lot. The
site plan graphically depicts how we would intend increasing our parking to
the east commensurate with the increase in square footage.
.
OffiCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 21
CSL-IIA FORM 2 (1I/l19O)
11
2
3
I ~
6
r~
9
[ 10
11
12
113
14
15
l 16
17
18
119
20
21
I;;
24
25
I~
28
1 29
30
31
I 32
33
34
I~
37
138
39
40
141
42
43
I:
46
1 47
-48
49
1 SO
. 51
52
Summary of the Ubrary Facility Space Requirements:
Provide a summary of the spaces, collections, readers seats and square foouge in the program:
(Attach additional pages if ncc:euary.)
Name of Soace/Area
Volumes In
Collections
LOBBY
~
N/A
Readers
Seats
12
SO. Fr.
805
BROWSING
17,251
28
1,841
~
REFERENCE
6,471
54
3,197
~
ADULT SERVICES
~
86,666
62
YOUNG ADULT
4,830
16
5,962
831
~
~ ADULT/REFERENCE WORKROOM
CHILDREN'S ROOM
N/A
N/A
~
56,424
47
760
4,352
590
CHILDREN'S WORKROOM
N/A
N/A
~
TECHNOLOGY USERS' CENTER
~
775
20
1,221
CIRCULATION DESK
N/A
N/A
740
~
~ C I RCULAT I ON WORKROOM
LITERACY TEAM OFFICE
~
N/A
N/A
1,290
6,000
N/A
1,650
400
STU DY ROOMS
N/A
N/A
~
~ MEETING ROOMS/EXHIBIT HALL
LIBRARY MANAGER'S OFFICE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2,850
370
~
N/A
DELI VERY AREA
N/A
100
~
Net Assignable Sub-toul:
178,417
~
239
26,959
CONTIIJUED
Non-Assignable Space": . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~
(Non-Assignable Square Foouge is ~
% of the Gross Square Foouge)
Toul Facility Gross Square Foouge: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .~
. "Non-Aslignablc" means utility areas of I buildin, required for the function of the building such U l!.airways. elevalon, dedicated camdon
and walkways, public lobbies, restroom, duct &balu, mechanical rooms, electrical ckIIeu, janitor', clOKts, rll'Cplaoes, interior Ind exterior waU Uuckncss,
melior amenities which are pan of the buildin& but Dot enclCJK:d, such U pati05, canopies, porcbes, t.:D\'cred walkways etc.
1
[
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 22
CSL-BA rOIL\! 2 (11./1190)
Summa,," of the Ubrar} FaciJiQ" Spacr Requl...m.nts:
J
( 4
5
6
I 7
8
9
[ ]0
]]
]2
I 13
14
]5
I ]6
]7
]8
]9
I 20
21
22
I 23
24
25
I 26
27
28
I 29
3D
31
[ 32
33
34
I 35
36
37
I 38
39
4U
I 41
42
43
I 44
"45
46
I 47
48
49
I 50
51
52
'-
I.
PrO\ide a summary of the spaces, ccIJections, readers seats and square footage in the program:
(Attach additionat palC5 if nccc:s.s.al)'.)
Volumes In Read....
Collections Seats SQ. FT.
N/A N/A 430
N/A N/A 205
N/A N/A 400
Namt of Spact/Area
.
STAFF LOUNGE/LOCKERS
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
.
.
STORAGE
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Ntt Assignablt Sub-Iota I:
.
178.417
239
27.994
Non-Assignable Space.: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
20.02
7.006
(Non-Assignable Square Footage is .
% of the Gross Square Footage)
Total Facility Gross Square Footage: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
35.000
. ~on-As.si&nablc. means utility areas of . buildini required for the function of the building such U ItaiT"Wl)'\, elevators. dedicated corridon
and "''iU..''''"I)'Io, public lobbies, n:strooms, duct IhJfl.i, mechanical rooms, decuical closel.l,janitor', cJoseu. r~pllc:a. intcrior and merior wall thicknea.
~=ric-:- &~~nities which .~ pan of the buildin& but nOI enclO5Cd, such as pati~, Clnopi~. porch~. covered ...Ikwa~ CIC.
omcIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Pagt 22
CSL-BA FOR.\! 2 (II/II!>O)
I
3
I
6
(
[
13
L
I:
1:
[
r
28
L
H
I
~
[
r
n
t
14
I~
r
iO
[
14
(
l
SITE DATA:
For new construction, conversion and addition/renovation projects, provide all of the following data for evaluation of
the proposed library site: .
Ownership and Availability
(proYide ror remode1in& proj.... u _ll.)
SUe
Is the library site currently owned by tbe applicant?
YesD No[]
Yes [I] No D
YesD NoUJ
Will tbe library site be owned by the applicant?
Is tbe library site currently leased by tbe applicant?
If the library site is leased, provide the name and address of the owner:
NAME: .
N/A
ADDRESS: .
N/A
If the library site is not already owned by the applicant:
(a) A legally executed option to purcbase agreement for tbe site sbail be submitted witb tbe application; or
(b) A legally executed lease or lease-purchase agreement for the site shall be submitted with the application.
(See Section 20414 (I))
Buildin~
(For Coavenion proj.... Only)
Is tbe building to be convened currently owned by tbe applicant?
N/A
YesD NoD
If the building to be convened is not already owned by the applicant, a legally executed option to purchase agreement
for the building shall be submitted with the application (even if tbe building will be donated to the applicant).
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: . SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Palle 23
CSI,BA FORM 2 (11/1190)
I
3
I
6
I
g
r
12
I:
(
r
.1
i'
.~
!S
(
!II
1:
[
r
r
Title Considentlons
(provide ror remodelins projeets u well.)
Sue
Provide a preliminary title repon for the proposed library site with the application (See Section 20424 (b)).
ROGER KAHELI N
Name of Title Company Officer: ~
Name of Title Company: ~
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
Address: ~
P.O. BOX 808
SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92112
Telephone: ~
231-4623
Are there any exceptions to marketable record title?
(See Section 20424 (b))
Yes 0 No [!)
lf so, the applicant shall provide legal counsel's written opinion regarding exceptions in the title repon.
Buildinl!
(For Conversion Projects Only.)
Provide a preliminary title repon for the building to be convened into a library with the application.
(See Section 20424 (b)).
Name of Title Company Officer: ~
N/A
Name of Title Company: ~
N/A
Address: ~
N/A
Telephone: ~
N/A
.1
l
r
.7
t
;0
~
r
I
Are there any exceptions to marketable record title?
(See Section 20424 (b))
Yes 0 No!TI
lf so, the applicant shall provide legal counsel's written opinion regarding exceptions in the title repon.
Boundary Survey
(provide for remodelins projeets u well.)
(For lDultipurpooe projects, provide for the library portion or projec:t only.)
Provide a boundary survey showing the metes and bounds of the proposed library site upon which the proposed library
facility and site improvements are to reside. The survey shall be stamped and signed by a licensed land surveyor.
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 24
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11JtJ9O)
11
2
I :
6
I~
9
r 10
11
12
I~
IS
[ 16
17
18
I~
21
22
[~
2S
I~
28
I~
31
132
33
34
I~
37
38
I ~9
40
41
I 12
13
44
1 :
47
I:
SO
151
Apprtlsal
(For lIIullipwpooc projecu. provide far !be tibrary portion or pn>ja:t 0IIIy.)
Silt
What istwas the purchase price of the library site?
1,865,000
.$
(P- !be (otIowiJI. oaJy II IppraiuI ilIajWred.)
What is the appraised value of the h"brary site? . $ 1,734,000
Name of appraiser who performed appraisal:. GREG LIMBACH AND THOMAS O. MARSHALL
Telephone: .
259-4900
232-2801
Credentials: .
BOTH HAVE MAl
(Shall have MAl or SREA)
En~Jose a copy of the appraisal for the property (See Section 20416 (d)).
Buildinll
What istwas the purchase price of the building to be convened?
.$
N/A
(pl'OYide lbe (oUowin. oaJy it Ipprailal is required.)
What is the appraised value of the building?
.$
N/A
Name of appraiser who performed appraisal: .
N/A
Telephone: .
N/A
Credentials: .
N/A
(Shall have MAl or SREA)
Enclose a copy of the appraisal for the property (See Section 20416 (d)).
Site Use Potential
A---nAilirt
Is the site strategically located in a geographically central pan of the library service area?
YesG] NoD
Yes D No III
Yes [[J No D
Is the site located in a retail commercial business district (either downtown or suburban)?
Is the site generally accessible to all pans of the service area?
I
L
OffiCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Pale 25
CSL-IIA FORM 2 (1111190)
t
3
l
6
r
9
G
13
U
16
I:
19
r~
22
r ~
2S
C
28
~
[
r
37
L
40
L
43
L
46
t
49
I
52
I
L
Describe any natural or anificial barriers which may impede access to the site:
There are no natural or artificial barriers which may impede access to the site.
List the major arterial routes in the proximity of the site with traffic count (number of vehicles per day) information:
Street Name
~ 4TH AVENUE
ORANGE AVENUE, EAST OF 4TH
~
ORANGE AVENUE, WEST OF 4TH
~
~
Number
of Blocks Traffic Count
from Site ~ Date
11 .080 MAY 1989
8,980 FEBRUARY 1990
10,870 FEBRUARY 1990
Is site located on a pedestrian circulation pattern?
Yes I!J No 0
Yes [!] No 0
Yes II] No 0
Can curb cuts be obtained to provide access to site?
Is site located on or near a mass transit line?
Number of mass transit lines stopping within 114 mile of site: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Librarv Parkin~
Number of spaces available off street, on site: ........................... ~
17C;
spaces
Number of spaces available off street, off site: ........................... ~
(within 500 feet of front door)
o
spaces
Number of spaces available on street: ................................. ~
(within 500 feet of front door))
o
spaces
TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES AVAll.ABLE FOR PARKING: . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ~
Number of parking spaces required by zoning: ........................... ~
175
150
spaces
spaces
Calculate the number of parking spaces required, il1.5 square foot of parking space is needed for every 1.0 square foot
of library building (assume an average parking space equals 350 SF/space):
Building Gross SF X 1.5 divided by 350 = ......................... ~
150
spaces
OffiCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Palle 26
CSL-BA FORM 2 (UJ1I'O)
t
3
I
6
r
9
G
13
U
16
I ;
19
C
L
26
L
29
[
r:
r
I:
r
I:
18
L
51
[
)4
l
I
If piOposed project provides less parking than 1.5 SF of parking space to 1 SF of building space, provide
justification of wby tbe library needs less parking:
Project does not provide less than the minimum parking required.
Site Description
~
The total square footage of the library site should equal the square footage shown in 1 through 7 below:
(U the project ia an addition 1.0 an c:tistinClibrary, Q)mplete thia leCtion ror the eatire aite, i.c., the c:xistinl site plus Iny newly acquired land.)
(U Ibe project is . mullipurpooe buildinl. complete tbis lOCIion only for Ibe library portion of Ibe project.)
1. PROPOSED LffiRARY BUILDING FOOTPRINT" . 3':i,000 SF
2. PROPOSED LffiRARY PARKING LOT . 75,730 SF
3. FUTURE LffiRARY EXPANSION OF BUILDING" . 10,000 SF
4. FUTURE LffiRARY EXPANSION OF PARKING" . 38.650 SF
S. REQUIRED LOCAL ZONING SET-BACKS . 30,035 SF
6. DESIRED AESTHETIC SET-BACKS &. AMENITIES . 30,600 SF
7. MISCELLANEOUS &. UNUSABLE SPACE . 59.328 SF
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF LffiRARY PROJECT SITE: . 27G.336 SF
.
"Footprint" means the square footage of surface area of the site that the building occupies.
.. If expansion for the building or parking will not take additional space on the site, please explain method to be
used:
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: . SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 1.7
CSL-BA FORM 2 (1111J9O)
l
(
(
(;
c
~
What is the current zoning classification of the site? ~
R-2
Will the site have to be rezoned to build the project?
YesD Nom
YesD Nom
Will a variance be needed to build the project?
If so, when can tbe variance be obtained? ~
N/A
Solar Orielllalion
(Date)
Will the orientation of the site and placement of the building on the site allow solar access from a westerly direction
into the library building through windows or doors?
C
18
l~
21
I
24
[:
28
L
31
I
34
I:
r
1:
w
L
r
19
[
;2
I
I
If yes, how will this problem be addressed:
Yes D No [!]
N/A
TOlJOr!rtlDhv
Describe the general topography of the site. Is the site generally level or will it require extensive rough grading?
Provide estimates on the amount and cost of cut and fill that may be necessarv:
Site is generally level with a slight slope from north to south of approximately 1 '-0"
per 200'-0" of length.
Has a topographical survey been completed?
Yesm NoD
Drainal!e
(provide tor remode1in1 projecu u -U.)
Is the site in the 1 00 Year Flood Plain?
YesD Nom
YesD Nom
Yes D No m
Do any water courses drain onto the site which require control?
Do any water courses drain off the site which require control?
Is the storm sewer system adequate to prevent localized flooding of the site during intense storms? Yes 0 No D
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 18
CSL-BA FORM 2 (111t19O)
.
California EnviTonrn~ntal Ouality Act (CEOA)
(
3
I
I
10
(
13
t
1:
20
I
23
r
26
I:
30
L
33
1
36
I:
r
.3
1
~
(
[
53
I
56
I
I
(See Public ReaourceI Code. Sectioftl 21000 . 21177 and California Code of Rqulations, Title 14, Sections 15000 . 15387)
(I'roYide for r=ocIeliD, projecu u well.)
The applicant, as the lead agency, shall provide evidence that the necessary environmental impact documentation (EID)
as required by the provisions of CEQA has ~n fully completed:
1) If the applicant has determined that there Is no possibility the project will result in an adverse environmental
impact, or that the project qualifies for a specific statutory or regulatory exemption, and therefore is not subject
to the provisions of the act, provide an explanation and appropriate citations:
Refer to CEQA document attached.
If an exemption is claimed for the project, provide a statement of the basis for the claim, and if completed, a
copy of the Notice of Exemption with the application.
2) If a negative declaration was adopted for the project, provide a final copy of the negative declaration, as well
as a conformed (stamped by the County Clerk) copy of the Notice of Determination which has been signed by
the lead agency and filed with the County Clerk with the application.
3) If the project was the subject of an Environmental Impact Repon (EIR), provide a final copy of the EIR and
a conformed (stamped by the County Clerk) copy of the Notice of Determination which has ~n signed by the
lead agency and filed with the County Clerk with the application.
Before adopting a Negative Declaration, or a final Environmental Impact Repon. the applicant shall submit the draft
environmental documents to the:
State Clearinghouse
Office of Planning and Research
1400 10th Street
Sacramento, California 95814
The applicant shall take into consideration timely comments made by state agencies on the project before adopting final
environmental documents and approving the project. The applicant shall provide either the compliance letter or the
comments from state agencies provided by the State Clearinghouse with the application. After project ~pproval, a
Notice of Determination shall be filed with the County Clerk before it Is submitted with the application.
OffiCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Palle 29
CSL-BA FORM 2 (tlJ1l9O)
I
3
(
7
I
10
I
13
[
[
20
I
!3
l
'7
L
30
I
\3
r
\6
[
10
l
13
I
.(j
(
r
3
I
I
I
Summarize the potential significant adverse effects to the environment of the proposed project and any
measures that have been adopted to mitigate or redu~ these effects:
None noted in negative declaration.
Axe there any unresolved legal actions pending against the project regarding CEQA compliance? If so,
provide the case name, coun number and a brief explanation:
N/A
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
PaKe 30
CSL-BA FORM Z (tl/1l9O)
1
3
I
6
r
9
r
12
L
IS
t
I:
n
l
'4
[
~7
I
10
[
r
17
I
10
r
13
{
.7
f
:0
l
[
I
Historit: distrit:ts
(Provide Cor remodelinc projeca u ...U.)
Was the existing library building, if it is being renovated or expanded as part of the project, or any buildings on
adjacent properties, built prior to 1941?
YesD N00
Is the existing library building, or any buildings on adjacent properties:
On the National Register of Historic Places?
YesD No0
YesD N00
Yes D No [i]
YesD N00
A National Historic Landmark?
A National Monument?
On O>unty or Municipal Historic Designation list?
Is there a local historic preservation ordinance that applies to the proposed project site or any adjacent properties?
YesD N00
If yes, briefly specify any applicable requirements or restrictions, such as height limits etc.:
N/A
If yes, is the proposed project conceptual design substantially in compliance with the local historic preservation
ordinance?
N/A
YesD NoD
omClAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 31
CSL-BA FOIt'll % (t 1JlIIIO)
t
3
I
6
(
Geotechnical Rel1Ol'1
Identify and summarize any special geologic conditions, including, but not limited to, compressible and
expansive soils, tunnels and mine shafts, unstable slopes, active seismic zones, excessive ground water
and areas prone to liquefaction. Indicate if these conditions will prevent the use, or significantly
increase the cost of developing the site for a public library building:
G
13
I ~
16
{~
C
23
I-
26
r
29
[
33
L
36
I
39
I:
I:
16
t
.9
I:
[
56
r
L
From a geotechnical engineering standpoint the site is suitable for construction of
the proposed building. The materials encountered in the borings consisted of firm
to stiff sandy clay and loose to medium dense clayey sand topsoils to a maximum
depth of 3-1/2 feet. Loose silty sand fill soils were encountered in boring 1 to a
depth of approximately 8 inches. Residual soils comprised of very stiff sandy clay
and medium dense clayey sand were encountered in boring 4 between depths of 1-1/2
to 5 feet. The surficial soils were underlain by Pleistocene age terrace deposits
comprised predominantly of hard sandy clay and clayey to sandy silt and medium dense
to dense clayey to silty sand. Near surface clayey soils possess a low expansion
potential. No tunnels or mineshafts are know to be present on-site or in the
vicinity. Free ground water was not encountered at the site and no surface seeps
observed. No faults are known to pass through the site. The faults generally
considered to have the most potentia] for earthquake damage in the vicinty of the
site are approximately 41 to 60 miles northeast of the site. Available information
indicates that the location of and geotechnical conditions are not conductive to
seismically induced waves, inundation due to dam or embankment fai lure, lands I iding,
lateral spreading, differential compaction, ground cracking and 1 iquefaction.
Provide a copy of tbe geotechnical repon performed by a licensed engineer witb tbe application.
DeTMlitio" costs
Describe any demolition costs involved with tbe site:
Preparation of the site wi 11 involve demolition of several one-story wood frame
structures consisting of several residences as well as a church and several small
outlying sheds. Located on the church grounds is an additional one-story wood
frame bui lding with basement and trellis. The demolition costs of these structures
is estimated at $59,700. The existing paving, hardscape, and landscape at each of
the residences will be demolished, as well as the parking lot and drive on the
church grounds. Cost for this work is estimated at $4,500. Genera] cleaning of
accumulated is estimated at $88,827 including general conditions, escalation, and
contingencies.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
Page 3:1
CSL-BA FOR.'II 2 (1111190)
1
2
3.
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
J7
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2S
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
REVIS~D fu~D APPROVED MARCH 6, 1991
--
P8S--03 ~
Describ< utilities availability and associated costs if any utilities are not cunently located within 100 fut of a propeny
line of tbe site:
Utilities
(AU o!r-lite COlli beyood 100 footutilicy tie.iIIa are local ...~&ible "'1""""". butlllall be identified IDd iIIcluded ill the bud,.. ..Ii...le uDder
iDeuliblc lite dl'\l'CJopmeral Cil>>u,.)
Utility Availability
Electricity Yes[D NoD
Telephone Yes[D NoD
Gas Yes [D No D
Cable TV Yes!lJ No D
Storm Sewer Yes!lJ No D
Sanitary Sewer Yes Ii] No D
Water Yes I:J No D
~S
Cost to BriM Service to Site
N!A
~S N!A
~ S N!A
~S N!A
~ S N!A
~ S N!A
~ S N!A
t.1)
(;;>
t!~
.....
. '
<G
o
E-<
"'u
~~
o-1H
'"
><
<G><
~<G
"'~
"'''''
OH
<G0-1
,-:
Silt Drvt1oD~llI Com
Utilities....................................... ~ S
Cut, Fill &< Rough Grading
Special Foundation Support
(plhnp rtc.)
......................... .
......................... .
~ S
~ S
Eli2ibl.
124,523.00
137,445.00
Paving. curbs, gutters &< sidewalks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retaining Walls ..................................
Landscaping. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Signage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Lighting .......................................
Remo\'al of underground tanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Removal of toxic materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rock removal ...................................
tower structures
Other (Specify)
~ISCELLANEOUS FEATURES - pedestrian gateways
.
.................. .
N!A
. S 253,624.00
. S N!A
. S 329.428.00
. S 11,345.00
~ S 82 , 186.00
~ S N!A
~ S N!A
. S N/A
~ S
201,189.00
. OFF S IrE WORK - Grading, pav~n.g... !'~~1:>~.~ .!'i'~t.t.e.r.s . S
TOTAL SITE DEVELOPMENT COSTS: ................ . S 1,139.740.00
omCLli NAME Of PROJECT:. SOUTH (HULl. VISTA LIBo~oY
LEONARD M. MOORE ~ ~'" .. .AI
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ~. 'VI ~
'\,
:>
.~
.-
IMh2ible
~ s
. s
. s
. s
. s
. s
~ s
. s
~ s
~
"\3
\
.~
~
~
~
"
. s
. s
. s
. s
c
:z
....
<G~
"''''
E-<"':
H"-
'"
0-11>-
C
.
<'"
C
E-<E-
<GL
"''''
""'"
0....
<GC:::
262,217.00
. s
262.217.00
Page 33
CSL-BA FOR.\! 2 (lI/1M)
t
4
I,
8
l:
12
(]
16
.~
L
20
~,
I
24
7~
L
29
L
33
I
~
37
L
n
L
4S
l
~9
L
n
[
56
,~
t
50
r
54
-,
1
58
I
L
MidJ:gfjDr CimurIsuuu:es:
1f there are problems with the proposed site, what mitigating circumstaDces lesseD the negative impact?
Describe the proposed dcsign solutions which moderate the site's drawbacks. Provide information on alternative
sitcs considered, and why tlie proposed site is the best location for a public library in the service area:
The site is very suitable for a library. There are no drawbacks to the site that
are known at this time. Adequate acreage for proposed library, landscaping, and
on site parking which exceeds the state formula standard.
YISUaI Record:
Provide photographs and/or a video tape of the site and surrounding area. Show several views of the site and a 360
degree perspective aroun~ the site of tlie surrounding buildings. Label all photographs and video tapes with the name
of the apphcant and project
MB21:
Provide a map showing the location of the proposed library site in the community. This map (or another with a larger
scale) ~hall snow the service area of the proposed project, and if possible, the nearcst existtng library (other than the
one bemg replaced).
PROJECf TIMETABLE
Provide the timetable for the proposed project. Show cstimated dates of completion, as well as actual dates of
completion:
TIMETABLE
DATE
February 5, 1991
~
~ Februarv 15. 1991
Novembe r 29, ]991
~
~ March 6, 1992
~ Auqust 30. ]992
~ Novembe r 15, 1993
Site PurchaselLease Agreement Executed
Schematic Plans & Cost Estimate
Design Development Plans & Cost Estimate
Working Drawings & Fmal Cost Estimate
Stan of Construction
Completion of Construction
Calculate the number of months from the month of application UDtil the cstimated stan of construction:
18.5
~
Months
Calculate the number of months for the construction of the project from stan to finish:
16
Months
~
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECI': ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Pale 34
CSl,BA FOR.!II 2 (11/1190)
l
3
(
7
L
11
r
15
r
19
r
Z3
i:
r
12
L
!6
[
10
[
~
r
~
r
;2
;,
l
l
{
5
l
9
I
I.
CONC.t:yruAL ARCHU.t:CI'URAL PlANS
New construction, conversions and addition/renovations:
For new construction, conversion and addition/renovation projects, a set of conceptual plans (no less than 22 X 34
inches for paper size} prepared by an architect licensed to practice in the State of California shall be submitted with
the application. MultIpurpose projects shall submit the required conceptual plans for both the total multipurpose
project, as well as the library ponion of the project.
The conceptual plans shall consist of the following:
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(I)
(g)
(h)
(a)
An area plan showing the library site in context with the surrounding "neighborhood buildings, parking and
streets.
A site plan showing the library building, parking lot and access roads, as well as any anticipated future expansion
of the "building ana parking lot. The site plan shall also indicate the direction of nonh.
A floor plan (single line) showing, and identifying by name on the plan, the major programmed areas for the
library. Each area shall show the square footage called for in the library building program and the actual square
footage allocated on the plan. "
Two sections through the building, one longitudinal and one latitudinal.
Two elevations, with one elevation being the front of the library building.
Outline specifications describing the type of construction by identifying the basic building components (structural,
mechanical etc.), and the type of occupancy. The archllect shall reference any applicable Sections of State
Statutes and State Building" Codes.
For the remodeling ponion of the project, a t100r plan which identifies the extent and limits of the remodeling.
For projects which involve rehabiJitation for health and safety purposes, the architect shall cite the specific
Sections of State Statutes, State Building Codes or local codes which demonstrate that the existing building is
in need of rehabilitation for health and safety purposes. U local codes are cited, provide a copy of any Clled
sections of the local code.
Remodellnll or existing libraries only:
For J>rojects which involve remodeling of existing libraries exclusively, only outline s~fications with a floor plan which
identifies the extent and limits of remodeling shall be submitted with the application. U the remodeling project involves
rehabilitation for health and safety purposes, the architect shall cite the specific Sections of State Statutes, State
Building Standards Codes or local codes which demonstrate that the existing library building is in need of rehabilitation
ror health and safety purposes. Provide a copy of any sections of the local code which have been cited.
omCIAL NAME OF PROJECT:. SOUTH CHULA V I STA LI BRARY
Pale 35
CSL-IIA FORM % (11/1190)
13
4
I,
8
I~l
12
n
.,)
16
P
.J
20
o
24
(J
28
r~
.,1
32
[}
36
~.,
lJ
40
C
44
(J
48
f~
~.
52
[
56
[
60
[
64
[
58
l
I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Normal Construction Costs In the Applicant's Area:
(See Section 20418 (c))
(For projocu with Dew CODStrucUOD ODJy.)
In order to justify the eligible projected construction cost estimate for new construction, the following information is
required:
The current (1990) cost of public library buildings figure of S115.20 per square foot multiplied by the following locality
adjustment factor:
1) County:.
San Diego
Multiplier Factor: .
1. 18
2) Locally Adjusted Cost Per ~uare Foot (SISF):
($115.20 X Multiplier Factor)
. S
135.94
I SF
This figure is increased by 113 ~rcent for every month from the State Librarian's deadline for application until the
anticipated bid date which proVIdes the eligible projected construction cost per square foot estimate.
3) Number of Months:
14
X .33 ..
.
.4.62
% Inflation Factor
4) Locally Adjusted SISF X Inflation Factor % ..
. S
6.28
I SF
The locally adjusted cost per ~uare foot figure added to the inflation factor cost per square foot figure (line 2 plus
line 4) equals the normal public construction cost in the applicant's area:
5) Eligible projected construction SISF:
"
. s
142.22
I SF
The eligible projected construction cost is calculated by multiplying the eligible projected construction cost per square
foot figure tunes the square footage of new constructIOn:
Eligible projected construction SISF:
(re-enter line 5)
142.22 X 35,000
. S
142.22
I SF
The Square Footage of New Construction:
.
35,000
SF
Equals:
6) The eligible projected construction cost:
. S 4,977,700.00
If the projected construction cost estimated !'Y the project architect is lower than the figure in line 6, the applicant
shall use the lower figure as the normal public construction cost in the applicant's area.
If the optional modification below is not utilized, the eligible projected construction cost may be increased by fifteen
percent to allow for a contingency at this point:
746,655.00
Eligible Contingency:
(15 % of line 6)
. S
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: . SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Page 36
CSL-BA FORM 1 (t t/1I9O)
13
4
t
8
(l
(:
15
(~
19
C
23
[J
27
r:
~J
31
r
35
r:
39
C
43
[
47
1:
51
I:
55
[
59
[
63
t
I
[
Optional mocllDcatlon:
The applicant may, at its option, employ a local cost comparison approach to increase the eligible projected
construction cost figure. List a minimum of three comparable public construction projects which have been lild within
two years of the State Librarian's deadline for application:
Contract
Proiect Date Bid CostlSF
A) . N/A $ I SF
N/A $ I SF
B) .
C). N/A $ I SF
D) . N/A $ I SF
E) . N/A $ I SF
F). N/A $ I SF
Comparable public construction projects are post offices, museums, counhouses, city halls, auditoriums, community
college and public libraries, senior atizens centers, public schools and recreation centers.
The costs per square foot of the above recently bid comparable projects are averaged to obtain the:
7)
. $
N/A
I SF
Locally Determined Comparable $ISF:
(average of A through F)
The average of this locally determined comparable cost per square foot figure (line 7) and the eligible projected
construction cost per square foot figure (line 3) equals the revisei:l eligible projected construction cost per square foot:
Locally Determined Comparable SISF:
(reenter line 7)
.$
N/A
I SF
Plus
Eligible Projected Construction SISF:
(reenter line 5)
.$
N/A
I SF
Divided by 2, Equals
8) Revised Eligible Projected Construction SISF:
.$
N/A
I SF
The revised eligible projected construction cost is calculated by multiplying the eligible projected construction COst per
square foot figure times the square footage of new constructIOn:
Revised eligible projected construction SISF:
(reenter line 8)
.$
N/A
I SF
x
The Square Footage of New Construction:
.
N/A
SF
Equals:
9) The revised eligible projected construction cost: . $
The revised eligible projected construction cost may be increased by fifteen percent to allow for a contingency:
N/A
Eligible Contingency:
(15% of line 9)
.$
N/A
omclAL NAME OF PROJECT: . SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Palle 37
CSL-BA FORM 2 (tlMlO)
I
3
(
3
t
l2
I
5
Detailed Projected Construction Cost Estimate
For new construction, tbe arcbitect sball provide the applicant, and tbe applicant sball submit witb tbe application, a
conceptual pbase estimate of tbe projected construction costs for tbe proposed project The estimate shall be organized
using eitber A or B. as follows, or a similar estimating format. TJie (ootnoted citations below are provided only as
a reference. Applicants are not required to use the external documents footnoted by asterisks in order to comply with
the cost estimate requirements.
A'
General Requirements
Site Work
Concrete
Masonry
Metals
Wood and Plastics
Thermal and Moisture Protection
Doors and Windows
rmisbes
Specialties
Equipment
Furnishings
Special Conditions
Conveying Systems
Mecbanical
Electrical
,
8
Q
.
2
B."
Foundations
Substructures
Superstructures
Exterior Closure
Roofing
Interior Construction
Conveying
Mechanical
Electrical
General Conditions
Special
Site Work
5
~
)
· Construction Specifications Institute (C.S.L) Masterformat Divisions
o. RS. Means Assemblies Cost Data Manual
For remodeling work, tbe arcbitect sball provide the applicant, and the applicant shall submit with tbe application, a
conceptual plans estimate of the projected construction costs for the proposed project. The estimate shall be organized
by the tbree types of eligible project expenditures for remodeling work:
A Energy Conservation
B. Access for the Disabled
C. Compliance with Current Health and Safety Requirements for Public Facilities
For remodeling work, the architect sball also provide a lump sum estimate for the remaining 'general' remodeling work
included in the project
Multipurpose Cost Comparison:
(For multipurpose projects only.)
The architect sball provide tbe applicant, and tbe applicant sball submit witb tbe application, a cost analysis comparing
the budget of the multipurpose. project as a wbole witb the budget of tbe library portion of tbe project, using tbe same
formats as above.
omclAL NAME OF PROJEeI': ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LIBRARY
Pqe 38
C$L.BA FORM 2 (1111J9O)
, REVISE~ fu~D APPROVED MARCH 6, 1991
ULI"1II")' Project Budge!
(prO\ide for all projects. Provide for library portion only of multipurpose projec15.)
liBRARY PROJECT COSTS EUGTBLE
1) Purchase Price or Appraised Value of Building . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ N I A
Construction Contract for:
2) Ne..' Construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,394,564
(Including additions)
Remodeling for:
3)
4)
S)
6)
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12)
13)
14)
IS)
16)
17)
18)
19)
20)
21)
22)
Energy Conser.'ation ......................... $
Disabled Access . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
He.olth &. Safery ............................ $
General (Other)
... ........ ................
Contingency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
659,185
Site Demolition CoS15 ............................. . $
Site Development Com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 1.139,741
Fastened Shelving & Built-in Equipment ................. $
Works DC An . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Furnishings ..................................... $
Movable Equipment ..............................
Geotechnical Reports ........................ _ . . . . . $
Architectural & Engin~ring Fees ................. _ . . . . $
Construction Cost Estimator Fees . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Asbestos ConsululDt Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $
Libra!) Consultant Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . $
Interior Designer Fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . S
Local Project Administration Com ......... - - . . . . . . . . .
Relocation Costs
) .... $
) ....$
Other (Specify
Other (Specify
Project Manager
OITICL...L I"...\IE or PROJEC"T: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
LEONARD M. MOORE . ~ Ut.
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE ~ . ~
88.827
748.380
43,946
628,490
N/A
2.965
527 . 348
10.000
o
20,000
100,000
N/A
N/A
llO,OOO
. $
. $
.$
. $
. $
. $
. $
.5
INEUGTBLE
N/A
o
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
o
262,217
N/A
N/A
o
o
521,000
N/A
o
N/A
N/A
N/A
. $
. $
. $
N/A
o
420.000
o
Pagr 39
CSL-BA FOIl\f 2 (11/1/90)
J
0<:
o
....
"'u
~~
"".....
c::.
>-
0<:>-
~'"
"';:;
"''''
0.....
0<:""
j
~
~
~~
.,
:z
...
:z
o<:z
"'<
....,..:
....1>-
'"
"""-
C
.
<'"
C
....>-
"''''
"'0.;
"''''
0>--
o<:c
.
REVIS~D AND APPROVED MARCH 6, 1991
EUGIBLE
.
23) Subtotal ..................................
(Add lines 1 through 22)
. $ 8.473.446
42,367
24) State Project Administration Fee
(112% of line 23 eligible costs)
.$
... ............0....
25)
26)
Purchase Price of Land ........................... . $ 1,865,000
~ppraiscd Value of Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
(NO lease or lease-purchase)
N/A
. $
N/A
27) Credit for Architectural & Engineering (A & E) Fees
(paid for prior to 2/15188 for 1st fundmg cycle,
and prior to 7/19188 for 2nd funding cycle)
28) TOTAL COSTS: ............................... . $ 10,380,813
SOURCES OF PROJECT INCOME:
29) State Matching Funds ............................ . $
(65% of line 28 eligible costs)
30) Local Matching Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
(35% of line 28 eligible costs)
6.747.528
3,633,285
31) City. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
32) County . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
33)
Special District ..................................... . $
34)
Private . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
35)
Other (Specify:
)....$
INEUGIBLE
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
. $ 1,203,217
3.633.285
o
o
o
o
36) Local Credits (Land, A&E Fees and Furnishings) ................... . $ 0
(Enter total of figures on lines 25 through 27 and only
furnishings from line 12 which have already been acquired
prior to the State Librarian's deadline for application)
(No credit for land which will be acquired)
(The addition of lines 31 through 36 must equal line 30)
37) Adjusted Local Match ...................................... . $ 3,633,285
(Line 30 minus line 36)
38) Supplemental Local Funds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . $
(The same as line 28 ineligible)
1,203,217
39) TOTAL PROJECT INCOME: ................................ . $ 11,584,030
(Add lines 29, 30 and 38)
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .
SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY
N/A
N/A
Page 40
0.::
o
E-<
"'U
~~
A
~
ffi~
"''''
0....
o.::H
,J
\!
~
~
'-'
z
....
~~
E-<H
....'"
'"
HI><
o
.
<0.::
o
E-<E-<
o.::u
"''''
"'0.::
0....
0.:: A
CSL-BA .-OR.\{ 2 tl V1J9O)
LEONARD M. MOORE ~J:lIJ.
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE {,(.(:
J1Mng
1
2
3
4
S
I ~
8
9
110
11
12
1 13
14
1S
[16
17
18
119
20
21
22
I~
25
[26
27
28
1 29
'30
131
32
33
34
13S
36
37
I~
40
In
42
43
44
I~
47
I:
so
I S1
S2
S3
I
I
Local J'Wldl", Commitment:
'Provide the necessary resolution by the governing body of the applicant required to suppon the application.
(See 5=ion 20416 (a))
SIGNATURES
The panies below attest to and cenify the accuracy and truthfulness of the application for California Library
Construction and Renovation Bond Act funds. U the application is sua:essful, the applicant agrees to execute the
project on the basis of the application data provide herein. .
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
I bereby affirm tbat the library jurisdiction, for wbicb I am the administrative agent, approves of tbe application and
will operate tbe faciliry as a library after its completion.
~VJ 1
..
1.~--J. \.
SIpaJ
ROSEMARY LANE
-~ -
~
February 7, 1991
Da..
~
LIBRARY DIRECTOR
Tille (1)po)
N..... ('I)pe)
BEAD OF PlANNING DEPARTMENT
(U applicable' Special Dislnell exempl)
I hereby cenify tbe accuracy of tbe 1990 and 2010 population figures contained in tbe application for tbe jurisdiction
which I represent.
t/Jt1 ~
~
~
February 7, 1991
Slpal....
Da..
..
ROBERT A. LEITER
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
~
N..... ('I)pe)
Tille (1)po)
ELECTED OFFICIAL
Signature of Mayor, Chairperson of Board of Supervisors, or Head of District, authorized to make application for the
local jurisdic1ion
.. ~" ",( k.(, tUoTl!:.
~
~ (.R<JA-t7 1: /p? /
Slpal....
Da..
LEONARD M. MOORE
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
~
..
N..... (1)po)
Tille (1)po)
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: .. SOUTH CHULA V I STA L1 BRARY
Page 41
CSL-IIA FOR-\! % (1I/1J9O)
.
r
J
L
7
I
10
r
13
r
16
C
L
I'
2S
r
28
C
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L
JP A projects only.
.
(H application is by a JPA applicant, provide the elected official and head of planning of the second party.)
ELECTED OFFICIAL
Signature of Mayor, Chairperson of Board of Supervisors, or Head of District, authorized to make application for the
local jurisdiction
~
N/A
~
SJpatan Dale
~
Name (T)'pe) Tille (T)'pe)
~
HEAD OF PLANNING DEPARTMENT
(U applicable - Special Di>trieta """"pI)
I hereby cenify the accuracy of the 1990 and 2010 population figures contained in the application for the jurisdiction
which I represent.
~ N/A
,~
SJpatllft Dale
~ ~
Name (T)'pe) \ Tille (T)'pe)
OFFICIAL NAME OF PROJECT: ~ SOUTH CHULA V I STA LI BRARY
Palle 42
CSL-BA FORM 2 (11/tI9O)
.
I
2
r
6
(0
11
L
15
[
19
[
23
r
27
r
31
r
35
r
w
L
14
[
18
[
;2
[
;6
r
iO
r
i4
L
;9
1
l.
OUTLINE
OF
REQUIREMENTS FOR A LIBRARY BUILDING PROGRAM:
APPENDIX 3
(To SoctIoa :I04tO (1<) " 5ocUoa :10420 (e) oIa opp1i<alloa rorm)
Table or Contents
Oveniew and Introduction
Provide a general introduction to the project with an overview of the need for the project along with a time
schedule for the project. Discuss the relationship of the library building program to the architectural design
process, as well as tIie roles of the library building te<1m members.
Community Analysis
Provide an in-depth understanding of the panicular a>mmunity by describing and analyzing all relevant factors
which will have an effect upon the librarys roles and plan of service.
Govemml!lIlal AllI1nc~
Identify all governmental agencies which will have an influence on the planning of the new facility and
describe the nature of the relationship. Identify key individuals and define thelT roles in the proJect.
LocaJion
Provide general information locating the project within the library service are<1 and local jurisdiction. An
are<1 map .showing t.he.locat!on of the proposed project site shall be included, if a site has been identified.
Funher site analysIS IS optIOnal.
Demof!rtlDhv
Provide information about the size, projected growth and demographic characteristics of the population
within the library service are<1. ThIS information shall include, but not be limited to, the composition
of the population by age, race, ethnicity, education and other socio-economic factors. This information
shall be analyzed and compared to the norm of larger populations such as the special district, city, county,
state and nation. This data shall be used in developmg the library's plan of service to its community.
IJbraT)' Institutional Analysis
Describe the mission of the public library and the library plan of service providing any information which will
be necessary to determine the allocation of space for the proposed library butlding in terms of collections, re<1der's
Se<1ts, staff workstations, special purpose UDlts and meeting room space.
His/on of rhe Librarv
Provide a brief history of the development of the library.
Libran Plan of Service
Define any applicable roles of the pro~sed public library and describe any specific goals and objectives
for library service to the community. Provide a detailed analysis of the types of services to be offered
as well as how the plan will be implemented in the proposed facility. Provide any applicable use statistics,
service standards or guidelines. Provide a citation and brief description if there IS a Jurisdiction-wide plan
of service that has 6een officially adopted. Provide a citation and summary analysis if there is a user
survey to suppon the library's plan of service.
Librarv ColJectwns
Describe the current status of the library a>llections and project the capacity of future holdings for the
proposed facility. Discuss collection development and provide justification for the size ana types of
a>llections based on demographics, previous as well as anticipated purchasing jlanerns, verifiable' library
use statistics, and any apphcable standards or guidelines. Provide a summary of all projected collections
to be housed in the library, as well as the conversion factors used to calculate the required shelving units
to store the holdings.
Page 1
,
,
l
3
l
7
L
11
(1
15
r
19
r
23
r:
28
L
32
L
36
[
40
[
44
r
*8
r
52
r
)6
57
L
il
L
I
!
I
Rea4en' Seals
Describe the number, ~ and allocation of the patron seating needed to meet the r~uirements of the
proposed facility. Identify any standards utilized in determinlDg the amount of seating as well as an)'
applicable conversion factors use to calculate the square footage needed to house the various types of
seating.
SDeCial PurDose UnilslSDaeeS
Identify and dcscn1>c the various kinds of special purpose units (CD-ROM readers, microform readers,
photocopy machines etc.) which will be required in order to suppon the operation of the proposed
facility. - Describe the significance of this equil'ment in meeting t1ie challenge of changing concepts in
public libraty service. Provide an allocation of the units as well as any applicaDle conversion factors used
10 calculate the square footage needed to house the special purpose \1D1ts.
Staff Workstations
Describe the projected staff orpnization and provide any applicable standards used in determining the
size of the projected staff. Provide the resulting number of staff workstations JpUbliC, office and
workroom) needed to provide the desired service level in the proposed facility, and in lcate the proposed
allocation of staff workstations. Provide conversion factors used to calculate the square footage needed
to house the various types of staff workstations.
Meetinp Room Ret1Uirements
Describe the number and capacity of meeting rooms for the proposed library. Indicate how this space
~~ns the library's plan of service and provide an allocation of the space. Provide conversion factors
to calculate the square footage needed for the various types of meeting room scats.
Facility Space Analysis
Summan of Fa&ilitv SlKIa Ret1Uirements
Provide a summary page(s) of the various spaces in the proposed library showing the name of the spaces
with the respective square footage, collections and reaaer's scats required.
SlKIIial RelDtionshiDS
Describe the relationships of the various spaces in the proposed library either through the use of
narrative, a spatial diagram or a matrix.
SlKIa DescriDtions
Provide a description of each individual space as well as a general narrative for the whole library which
addresses, as appropriate, the following items:
Square footage, occupancy by staff and patrons, type and size of collections, functional activity
description, spatial rela!lonships, flexibility, expandabiliry, staff efficiency, energy efficiency,
fenestration, space finishes, building materials, access for the disabled, acoustics, environmental
conditions (HV AC), electrical power supply, illumination, communications, computer applications,
security systems, signs, audio-visual aspectS, visual supervision and layout of furntture and
equipment.
Financial Analysis
Provide a preliminary capital outlay project budget for the proposed facility with cost justifications.
Pale:
EXHIBIT B
~ rgiO - - - - - - - - - fD !" :'" '" ~
!" :'" '" $" ~ ~ !'> ,.. P $" ~ ~
JJ !12 Q :; r- > ~ > C> "T1 ~ "T1 !a ~ ~ f' ?" !" z ." ."
~ CD 0' ~ ;; ~ c !4 CD ~ ~ c ~
a ::T ~ 0 co a ;; .!2
co ~ 01 2: " ~ :t ~ m
co i !!l ~ ~ ~ i S' ::T a
~ ~ 0" -< ~ ~ iii' m " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ::T 8- '5! co 8- i!
~ ~ C ::T !a. :: ~
Q 3 i. ~ !l c: :> S' ~ .g i! ::T 8: m. !!l z
II: ~ g' 0' ~ > tJ> 5' ."
5' ~ 0; ::. ::T ... "" ~ ~ ~
:; 14 g '" :> '" !!!. co g 3 g> g '" ii' \:D
!!! :> III ~ m l s: co ~ i c
~ co i>> c " i IS g' !I!
~ a ~ '" " i a c.
c i' a i>> '" m
!l "T1 S' g ~ ... ~ co
g' I "T1 a !il I Qo III 01 i.
"T1 I "T1 III CD g'
III i I 3' ~. c ! ~
!!! iii
I
Ie i :; ~
"T1 ,S1 8
I c
en "" c co 0
CD Q -;;' !a. ....
:> 3 i C5
Co 8- ~ III
(') S
0
3 g
'12.
CD II'
~ iii
Co
61
~ .....
3
-i
R \:Do:!>
co~
c.5.a
en." !I (') III co > <
11>' - II> 0 !B.~!.
"o~=:>
; co.
~g'03~
x =-
~co-'~"T1
o.l>o2en-. o:!
- N - B
(')0:> S C
>'" CD_ >::cc.
~..... 1::0 381
0-=
~ -.
N 11''' o C(')
'" .;: CD ~..~....'~
..... ~
b
0 CQ
0 CD
~
~......
o:!g'::c
c 5. ~
c. ~
co>
!B.n 1'>
."
a
en III ." (') (') i ::! "11 (S.
S 0 ~ 0 ~ - ~ n
:> 0 :> a; 'iO <-
CD Co co S c ~
r- ~ ~ n ~ ~ ~ ~,
C' ~
~ 3: ." ..
!I .. I
0;' g ~ ~ ; ~ cr.
~ ~ 0
" ~ I:: :>
:> 0- 0'
~ CD ~ i
~ ~
i:r > III
~ :I:I I c
~ a .. t
~ p
en (') ~
cC' = :0'
:> :I:I
S II r
c
c ~ c ~ !::! c ;
S ~ ", ~
CD ~ a; (')
-g. 8.
0 ~
:> ..
..
!1!lli~:~~
"COR
II~rtt!
: Iii
,Jar
..,.
w
.... ...,.............,.......,........
,..-:.:.:.:.:.:.:...:.:.:.,-....:.
"",:,:",:",:"""".,.:.;.,.:.
:.:.,.:., ::):f:::::::,{:::?:t
1m :::-::-'-:-:.:"'.,:.::-:':
....'.........-..,..............'..
..................
.,. ...................................,..
:~::: }:::'~':;~'::?:::'~,?:';:::;,
:?::t::rJ/(?I
....':.'...'..,..;.'".'.."....'.'..
'w'
...,....,........
.--,--....-,...,..
.....................
............ .
........,......,.,.
........,.......".
..-,.............
.... ........
................
.,...............,...;.'...,.
.....".....
..,..........-...-,....-.......-.
.................,
..-...............,......,.......,....
................
,.;...",.""
:;.:;::.',,:.:.;<....'.':.......
':::::':::'::::~::...'.
,:::,::,:::,:::",.,
.::~:::::::~:':.",.:.,
:::;:".:.,.;.:.:.,,,.
t:ttt::t::
"""""",;"",",.'.
..",.,.~,..,'.'.' ..
..........
..,. ',W.'
:,:~,:~~,:",;"
...
..
...,.
:~:::::k,;::,',.:':""',:'".,...
....,.........................,....
..................
::~:~.:;.,.,.:.
....
tft:
.,.,,:.,.;.:.,
.,...........,........'.
t::::/':
::i:}:::'
...:-,....
:':'.:;'::"::
::':':::'::::: ..
.,.,.,.,.,.,.,.
::t=::::::::
.,.........
',.
.,,;.,.:.,.:.,........,
.":-,,,.:.,.,-,.,.,.,
............-.,"...
::':;:;r;::::'::':'::
...,.......;.:::,;..'....
~':;:::~:':':',;.,.,.,.,.......
..:::::.:,.:.:,.:.:,::'....'..,.
...'.....',..'.'.-................
...............,.
,.,.:.:.: ..;...........
,:.,.,.",
::::~:""
...............,.
'.....'.....................,..
..............,..
:;~:;t; };:::::::::::':::':':,-'-.
.......,)..
tw..::,...:..,..:,::':'
~::~"., ))kG'<:"'~"""'"
~::~:~, .. '."., ',:,:,,,:,:::.
,~:;,.:.:;:......., ...
.....,.....
n ~f:(tt/::}:::::;.:::'
~il!I~I..
!::Qe;>
pi
II
~_II!i
Inlt!
li;~i
IBSTROCTIOBS
Any chanqes to the project ~udqet, as approved in the Grant Application,
must ~e reflected on a Budqet Chanqe Request (BCR). All amounts should ~e
rounded up to the nearest whole dollar. complete the form as follows:
Line 1: Official name of project (paqe 1 of Grant Application).
Line 2: Project' assiqned to Grant Award Contract.
BCR f1
Lines, 3 throuqh 18:
APPROVED BORD AC'r BUDGBT - Bnter each eliqi])le cost
in the proj ect ])udqet as approved in the Grant
Application (Paqes 311 . 40). The total should
equal Line 28, paqe 40 in the Grant Application.
BUDGBT CBUlGB REQUEST DOtJJIT - Enter the requested
chanqe amounts, ~y cateqory, in this column. The
total of this column aust equal zero.
JtBVJ:SBD BORD AC'r BUDGB'1' - Add/Su1:Itract the BCR
amount from the Approved Bond Act Budqet amount and
enter net chanqe. The revised ])udqet total aust
equal Line 28, paqe 40 in the Grant Application.
Su1:Isequent BCRs
Lines 3 throuqh 18:
APPROVED BOJID ACT BUDGBT - Bnter the "Revised Bond
Act Budqetll from previous BCR. i
BUDGBT CBUlGB REQUEST AKOtJJIT - Enter the requested
chanqe amounts, ])y cateqory, in this column. The
total of this column aust equal zero.
Justitication for BCR:
JtBVJ:SBD BORD ACT BUDGBT - Add/Su1:Itract the BCR
amount from the Approved Bond Act Budqet amount and
enter net chanqe. The revised ])udqet total must
equal Line 28, paqe 40 in the Grant Application.
Explain in detail reason for BCR in ])lock on riqht
side of form. Attach additional paqes as necessary.
>;
The BCR must ~e siqned ])y an individual with
Xndicate a contact person and telephone num])er.
address listed on reverse side.
project responsibility.
Send completed form to
The California State Li])rarian will approve the BCR or notify the Grant
Recipient as to any deficiencies of the BCR within 15 days after receipt.
41# ~ '...
Exhibit C
.~~....:......I.....t......~o.me.......CO.... r.-.........:.rI........~..~.......R........n.....:u.<b~....~...F.......~.O.r...............p...;~~~~~~;;i,!i~j!:~j'~;i;f;i~~r;;::~;1:~;
.,....,...;_:",.:..:,. :':"": '' ,,~~~ .'" ,., """"''-':::':'::::{':':::::::::':::\::{:(::::::':~ """:":"""""':"':':"':::::'/:::~::~ ;;::;::;::;::::;;:;~:::,::::;:::::)~~~:\lWH\Httn::~::
..............................CA. ..uro....... RNtA. ...S. ;r~.T.E...IJ..).BRA. .RY
,.....,...-.........' . - ' ',', '.
..'.'-....................,..." , " """ ".','.
~l;..ci~..r.~iii.l..l.~.i~.:~...............
. ,........, ......... ........ --',
....
1. Official Project Name:
2. Project II:
3. Payment Request #:
4. Report Period: .-1.-1_ to .-1.-1_
Category
5. Purchase Price/Appraised Value 01 Land
6. New Construction
7. Remodeling lor:
a. Energy Conservation
b. Disabled Access
C. Health & Safety
8. Contingency
9. Site Development Costs
10. Site Demolition Costs
11. Fastened Shelving & Built-In Equipment
12. Works of Art
(A)
Budget
Amount
(8)
Previous
Expenditures
13. Furnishings
14. Geotechnical Reports
15. Architectural/Engineerlng Fees & Credits
16. Construction Cost Estimator Fees
17. Asbestos Consultant Fees
18. Ubrary Consultant Fees
19. Interior Designer Fees
20. Other (Specify)
21 State Administrative Fee
22.
23.
24.
Totals
Less 10'lIl Retention (
TotalPa~entReQuest
Additional Information:
See Reverse Side lor Instructions
Page 1 01 2
IC)
Expenditures
this Period
State Share
(0)
ExPEInditures
this Period
Local Share
(E)
Cumulative
State
Expenditures
)
P85-INV (REV. 3191)
" .
DlSTRO~XO.S
To ensure timely payment of funds by the California state Library (CSL),
the Payment Request must be complete and accurate. All amounts should be
rounded up to the nearest whole dollar. Paae 2 of this PaYment Reauest
Bust be comDleted or the Reauest will not be Drocessed. Complete the form
as follows: (Request should be typed with a recommended 12 pitch elite.)
Official name of project (Page 1 of Grant Application).
Project f assigned to Grant Award Contract.
NUmber of this Payment Request. Begin with number 1.
Indicate the beginning and ending dates of the time period this
request for payment covers.
Line 1:
Line 2:
Line 3:
Line 4:
Lines 5 through 21:
BUDGBT AHOUBT - Enter amount of each eligible cost
included in the project budget as approved in the
Grant Application (pages 39 '40). The total of
this column should equal Line 28, Page 40 in the
Grant Application.
Purchase Price of Land/Building - Combine
Line 1, Line 2S and Line 26 of the Grant
Application on Line 1 of the payment Request.
Architectural :rees - Combine Line lS and
Line 27 of the Grant Application on Line lS
of the Payment Request.
PREVIOuS BXPENDITURES Enter year-to-date
expenditures. Totals of Columns (D) through (D)
from previous Payment Request.
BXPENDITURES ~IS PBRIOD STATE SHARE - Enter 6S%
of total eligible expenditures for this reporting
period.
BXPENDITURES ~IS PBRIOD LOCAL SHARE - Enter 3S%
of total eligible expenditures for this reporting
period.
ctlJWLATIVB STATB BXPENDITURES - Add columns (D) and
(C). Amount shall not exceed column (A).
Line 22: Add totals of columns (A) - (E) .
Line 23: Enter 10% of Line 22(C).
Line 2": Line 22 (C) minus Line 23.
Additional InforBation:
This area is available for any comments or explanations of this
form that you feel are necessary.
~...e@Yrri.~.~..R~~.. ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................{.........~R~novatiOfi...60nd.Aii(.bf...j988
. :,:;:,:::::,:::,,:::::::::,:::,:,:::::::::::::::::~:::,:::::::::::,::;:;:.;.;.:;..;-::,...;.:.....;.' .....
Project Status
1. Construction activities (summarize the construction activities that took place
during this reporting period, including percentage of work completed
and schedules that were or were not met):
2. Problem areas (summarize any problems that occurred during the reporting
period, including work stoppages, weather conditions, or any other occurrence
that delayed or caused a change in work):
U::it: AUulllUNA . IF .
I certify that this report is accurate and in accordance with California Ubrary Construction and Renovation Bond Act
laws and regulations. I further certify that these are actual expenditures or credits allowed under the Act and that
all funds were expended for the purpose of liquidating obligations legally incurred.
3. Person Preparing Report 4. Project FISCal Officer 5. Project Coordinator
I I I I I I
Signature Date Signature Date signature Date
Name Name Name
ITltle Title Title
II elephone Telephone
Ef:'MAiLpAYMENTTo:;;.Iftp...........
.,.,.x;.;.:.:::.,.;.;.:.;.,.;.;.:.:;.:.:.", :-:';":':';':':':::':':::';;::'::;':"::';:;'::'::':"':'~ .;:::::::::::::::~:::~.;,,:;;::,.:-:< ;';';:'-;':>:'>"";';""
Telephone
,*!a~~!t4~!Cfc!1!!~ij;.'l;i;.;E
California State Library
Library & Courts Building
Fiscal Services - Room 215
914 Capitol Mall
Sacramento, CA 95814-4877
See Reverse Side for Instructions
Page 2 of 2
P85-INV (REV. 3/91)
Line 1.
Line 2.
Line 3.
Line .c.
.-.... ... i"
DlSftUC'1'I:OBS
Self Explanatory (use additional pages if necessary).
Self Explanatory (use additional pages if necessary).
Name, title, telephone number and signature of individual who
prepared payment Request and the date it was prepared.
Name, title, telephone number and signature of individual who has
financial responsi~ility for the project and the date this payment
Request was approved such individual.
Line 5. Name, title, telephone number and signature of individual who has
project management responsi~ility and the date this Payment
Request was approved such individual.
Line 6. Name of local jurisdiction and address to which the State
Li~rarian shall mail payments.
Line 7. California State Li~rary address to which this Payment Request
shall ~e mailed to. S~mit one original copy (with original
signatures) and three duplicate copies of Pages 1 and 2.
CALIFORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library Construction
and Renovation Bond Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD MO: P85-032
BXHIBIT D
STATEMEMT OF COMPLIAMCB
The prospective contractor's signature affixed hereon and dated
shall constitute a certification under the penalty of perjury under
the laws of the state of California that the contractor has, unless
exempted, complied with the nondiscrimination program requirements
of Government Code Section 12990 and Title 2, California Code of
Regulations, Section 8103.
SIGMATURE AMD TITLE
DATE
1
CALIPORNIA STATB LIBRARY
California Library Construction
an4 aenovation Bon4 Act of 1988
GRANT AWARD 50: P8S-032
BXHIBIT B
50BDISCaIMIBATI05 CLAUSB
1. During the performance of this contract, the recipient,
contractor and its subcontractors shall not deny the
contract's benefits to any person on the basis of religion,
color, ethnic group identification, sex, age, physical or
mental disability, nor shall they discriminate unlawfully
against any employee or application for employment because of
race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, physical
handicap, mental disability, medical condition, marital
status, age (over 40) or sex. Contractor shall insure that
the evaluation and treatment of employees and applicants for
employment are free of such discrimination.
2. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of the Fair
Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code, section 12900 et seq.),
the regulations promulgated thereunder (California Code of
Regulations, Title 2, sections 7285.0 et seq.), the provisions
of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the
Government Code (Gov. Code, Sections 11135-11139.5), and the
regulations or standards adopted by the awarding state agency
to implement such article.
3. Contractor or recipient shall permit access by representatives
of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the
awarding state agency upon reasonable notice at any time
during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24
hours notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, other
sources of information and its facilities as said Department
or Agency shall require to ascertain compliance with this
clause.
4. Recipient, contractor and its subcontractors shall give
written notice of their obligations under this clause to labor
organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or
other agreement.
S.
The contractor shall include the
compliance provisions of this clause
perform work under the contract.
nondiscrimination and
in all subcontracts to
1
STATE ~ CA.l~':"RN1A
DRUG.FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION
STD. 21 (NE"W , 1-10)
Exhibit F
COMPA.NYIORGA,NIZATION NAME
The contractor or grant recipient named above hereby certifies compliance with Government Code
Section 8355 in matters relating to providing a drug-free workplace. The above named contractor or
grant recipient will:
1. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, di3tribution, dispensation,
possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against
employees for violations, as required by Government Code Section 8355(a).
2. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program as required by Government Code Section 8355(b), to
infonn employees about all of the following:
(a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace,
(b) The person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace,
(c) Any available counseling, rehabilitation and employee assistance programs, and
(d) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
3. Provide as required by Government Code Section 8355(c), that every employee who works on the
proposed contract or grant:
(a) Will receive a copy of the company's drug-free policy statement, and
(b) Will agree to abide by the tenns of the company's statement as a condition of employment on
the contract or grant.
CERTIFICATION
I, the official nan1ed below, hereby swear that I am duly authorized legally to bind the contractor or
gram recipient to the above described cenification. I am fully aware that this cenification, executed on
the date and in the county below, is made under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of
California.
OFFK;lAl'S NAME
DATE EXECUTED
CONTRACTOR Of GR~ RECIPIENT SIGNATURE
I EXECUTED IN TIiE COUNTY OF
TlTlE
FEDERAlI.D. NUMBER
_1_
ATTACHMENT II
NOTICE OF AN OFFICIAL MEETING
JOINT MEETING OF THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE,
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND PARKS AND
RECREATION COMMISSION
SEPTEMBER 4, 1991, 6:00 PM
CONFERENCE ROOMS 2 AND 3 IN THE PUBLIC SERVICES BUILDING
AGENDA
I. Roll Call
II. Report on the impact of the proposed State Library Grant
contract relevant to placement of a community center/gymnasium
on the Fourth and Orange Avenues site
III. Montgomery Planning Committee Recommendation
IV. Parks and Recreation Recommendation
V. Library Board Recommendation
VI. Adjournment
<
DATE: August 29, 1991
TO: Montgomery Planning Committee
Parks and Recreation Commission
Library Board of Trustees
FROM: Library Director and Parks and Recreation Director
SUBJECT: Report on the impact of the State Library Grant contract
relevant to placement of a community center/gymnasium on
the Fourth and Orange Avenues site.
BACKGROUND:
Previous to the city's submittal of an application for California
Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act (Proposition 85)
funds, many community meetings were held regarding the uses of the
proposed 6.1 acre park site at Fourth and Orange Avenues and the
SDG&E right-of-way to the south (approximately 3.5 acres). Park,
community center, library, gymnasium, swimming pool and playing
fields uses were discussed under the guidance of the consulting
firm, POD, Inc. On August 16, 1990, Council authorized the Library
staff to prepare an application for the Proposition 85 Bond Act
funds and approved the Orange and Fourth Avenue park site for the
proposed library. Council also moved to accept a site plan which
showed a community center/gymnasium, a library, an amphitheater,
parking and playing fields under the SDG&E right-of-way.
(ATTACHMENT A) In the ensuing months, the State Library indicated
that a site combining a library and a community center/gymnasium
would not be competitive since the bond act, as passed in November
1988, was for library purposes only.
Subsequently the architect placed the library building on the plot
with a potential future (building and parking expansion toward the
east. This potential expansion was expressed in order to show that
the Library could be enlarged, if necessary, to provide at least
.5 sq. ft. per capita to meet the local service needs of the
projects population in 2010, as required by the grant. No
community center/gymnasium was shown. The thought at the time was
Page 2
a community center/gymnasium could be built if the library
expansion did not take place. The interior of the proposed library
building was designed with the placement of public meeting space
and exhibit hall so they would be accessible from a future
community center.
On January 2, 1991 the Montgomery Planning Commission supported the
conceptual plans which did not show a community center/gymnasium.
The Committee did not support the idea of a future community center
or gymnasium on the eastern portion of the site, and requested the
eastern sector be a park. (ATTACHMENT B)
On January 9, 1991 at a special joint meeting of the Library Board
of Trustees and the Parks and Recreation Commission, both bodies
supported the conceptual plans with room on the site for a future
community center/gymnasium implied. (ATTACHMENT C) After the
formal vote, they planned to address the Council on the need for
a community center on this site in the future. The Parks and
Recreation commission addressed Council on the need for a community
center/gymnasium by letter on January 17, 1991 (ATTACHMENT D) and
continued their concern for park land at a City-wide Boards and
commissions meeting later in the spring. (ATTACHMENT E).
On February 15, 1991 the city filed the application as reviewed by
the various boards and commissions without the community
center/gymnasium being shown. The City of Chula vista was awarded
the $6,747,528 grant on April 23, 1991. The winning plan outlined
a 35,000 sq. ft. building and 175 parking spaces. There was also
(
a potential building expansion of 10,000 sq. ft. and 50 parking
spaces to meet future population growth in the service area. This
future addition was indicated on the eastern portion of the lot.
DISCUSSION:
In June 1991, the State Library sent a draft of the grant contract
Page J
for the Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act to the City.
This contract would preclude using any portion of the site for
anything other than library purposes for approximately fifty years,
the typical life of a library building. The draft contract
states:
"The title record for land shall specify the STATE'S interest by
recording that the land shall be used to provide direct public
library service for twenty years following the completion date of
the PROJECT or the useful life of the library building in place
upon it, whichever is longer, as specified in Education Code
Section 19667".
Immediately noting the long-term delay in putting a community
center/gymnasium on the eastern portion of the site, Library staff
asked the Assistant State Librarian, David Price at a contract
meeting on June 17, 1991, if the city could remove the 1.25 acres
(future parking) from the library plan. He cautioned against
removing any part of the proposed building expansion, but said it
might be possible to remove some of the grounds. In a subsequent
telephone conversation with Richard Hall, the Bond Act Officer, he
said the State Library I s position was "receptive to any changes
that would improve the project." He also said, the State Librarian
will not review the suitability of preliminary ideas. The City
would have to resubmit a new application formally excluding the
1.25 acres. This new application would then be judged as to its
competitiveness with other grants. Mr. Hall also cautioned that
the grant amount would be reduced 65% of the cost of the land
(
removed. If denied, the City could return to the original grant.
In July and August both the Library and the Parks and Recreation
Department staff proceeded to try to provide for a community
center/gymnasium by relocating parking under the SDG&E right-of-
way. After reviewing various alternatives, the Parks and
Page 4
Recreation Department narrowed the options to a gymnasium without
a community center.
ALTERNATIVES NOT REQUIRING REAPPLICATION
Alternative I.
Use the future parking area of 1.25 acres for passive library
grounds. In the grant application sod and an irrigation
system are outlined. No "park" development was shown for
reasons of economy and to be compatible with the future
parking purpose. (ATTACHMENT F)
Alternative II.
Expand the original grounds concept to develop a more active
park with walks, a plaza with palms, natural appearing mounds
and groves of trees on the perimeter. Under the SDG&E right-
of-way would be 30 parking spaces off Fourth Avenue, an open
turf area and picnic shelters. (ATTACHMENT G)
ALTERNATIVE REQUIRING RE-APPLICATION
Alternative III.
Design a combined community center and a gymnasium and
relocate the parking for future library expansion and
gymnasium under the SDG&E right-of-way. The Parks and
Recreation Department decided that a gymnasium would be more
useful to residents of the area and eliminated the community
center from the site on the premise that some community center
<
type programs could be held in the library's meeting room and
exhibit hall. (ATTACHMENT H)
A long term guarantee from SDG&E for future parking on their right-
of-way is necessary for approval of a new bond application. The
State Library might consider the City's re-location of parking if
Page 5
it were adj acent. Staff
indicated that multiple year
conversation with SDG&E in August
licenses have been offered, but SDG&E
has the option to give one years notice in order to terminate
agreements. In the light of this latest development, the Library
staff feels a new bond application locating required or future
parking in the SDG&E right-of-way would diminish the pr~ject and
would not be accepted by the State Library because the parking is
not a certainty.
City staff recommends accepting Alternative II.
Should Council approve the staff recommendation to eliminate the
community center/gym from the Fourth and Orange Avenue site, an
alternate site to locate the community center/gym in the Montgomery
area should be considered. There are two potential sites in or
near the Montgomery area that can accommodate a gymnasium facility
on existing City property. The proposed alternate sites are Loma
Verde Park and Otay Park. Each site has its advantages and
disadvantages.
The Loma Verde site was discussed as a potential area to build a
gymnasium north of the existing Center for several years. This
facility would essentially serve the southern portion of the city.
However, it would not be located in the Montgomery area.
The second possible location is on Otay Park, 5.6 acres. Although
the actual park is outside the annexed Montgomery area, this park
serves mainly the people of the Montgomery area. The major
disadvantage for this site would be the necessity to master-plan
the park to relocate existing park amenities. Also this site is
adjacent to the elementary school with the possibility of a joint
agreement with the school district to include their
field/playground areas into an overall plan for this site.
.
Page 6
Neither one of these sites will reduce the amount of deficient park
acreage in the Montgomery area.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Alternative I.
No changes
-0-
Alternative II.
Develop the future parking area into a park and connect
with the SDG&E right-of-way.
A. Eastern 1.25 acres park
B. SDG&E Right-of-way park
$397,396
713.929
Alternative III.
Total
$1,111,325
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
Build a gymnasium on 1.25 acres
SDG&E right-of-way, into a park and
parking
Impact on funding ratios due to loss
of 1.25 in grant as estimated by
Martin Chase, Assistant Director of
Management Services
Cost estimate by architect to
reapply for grant
Cost of five month delay on project
based on State Library's inflation
factor of 1/3% per month.
(ATTACHMENT I)
$1,752,255
781,847
329,000
15,000
111. 900
Total
$2,990,002
<
. .
. .
.,
ATTACHMENT A
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING/WORKSESSION OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
city Manager Goss; . City Attorney
Boogaard; and Library Director Lane
OTAY RANCH UPDATE
Thursday, August 16, 1990
4:50 D.tn.
1. ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
2.
REPORT:
'-.
Council Ccnference Room
Administration Buildina
Mayor Cox; Councilmembers Moore, Nader
and Malcolm
Councilmember McCandliss
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to continue this item. The city Manager is
to select the date.
3.A. REPORT:
B. RESOLUTION 15790
-
ON THE APPLICATION FOR A GRANT FROM THE
CALIFORNIA LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND
RENOVATION BOND ACT OF 1988 (PROPOSITION
85)
AUTHORIZING LIBRARY STAFF TO PREPARE AN
APPLICATION FOR LIBRARY BOND ACT FUNDS,
APPROVING THE ORANGE AND FOURTH AVENUE
PARK SITE FOR THE PROPOSED LIBRARY,
APPROPRIATING $114,500 FOR THE
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES NECESSARY TO
APPLY, AUTHORIZING STAFF TO NEGOTIATE A
CONTRACT WITH WHEELER-WIMER-BLACRMAN
ASSOCIATES FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
AND WAIVE THE BIDDING PROCESS
City Manager Goss stated the report recommended that the City
proceed with preparing a pre-application for the California
Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act funds in order to
obtain the funds necessary to build an area library in the
southern part of the City. The funds requested to complete this
application and acquire professional design services ($114,500
from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund) are
necessary in order to stay in the running for the application.
Mr. Goss suggested the Council make two decisions prior to
committing these funds. First, a decision needs to be made on
the selection of the site for the library. The three advisory
committees reviewing this matter recommend the library be located
at the Fourth and Orange site. Secondly, it is necessary to have
concept approval regard~ng the master plan for the library
located at Fourth and orange.
'. ,
,
~itv Council Minutes
-2-
Auaust 16. 1990
\
Mr. Goss added that if the City -15 successful in obtaining the
grant, issues that the Council should be aware of include:
-The city must come up with 35' of the grant in matching
funds. (This can be obtained from the land value of the
property being acquired for the site. It can also be
obtained from the street improvements that will' be made
around the site.)
-It will be necessary to put money into furnishings.
-Operational expenses.
-Electromagnetic radiation from the power lines.
Mr. Goss .further recommended that the requested $114,500 be
reimbursed to the General Fund from other non-General Fund fees
which could be accomplished over a period of time.
Councilmember Malcolm commented that before a decision is made on
the resolution, two determinations need to be made. (1) Where is
the next library going to be located: and (2) if the library is
going to cost +$1 million per year to operate, are funds
available to pay for the operation?
Mr. Goss stated that the city is considering two area libraries:
one in the eastern part and one in the southern part of the City.
The City is receiving money through Development Impact Fees to
build a library in the eastern part of the City. There is a
dilemma becaus~the need is in the southern part of the City and
the funds are in the eastern part of the City.
city Attorney Boogaard recommended that the Council bifurcate the
issue of financing a library versus the issue of siting this
particular library with this grant fund.
MOTION
MSC (Nader/Malcolm) bifurcate the issue of financing a library
and the issue of site location. (The vote was 3-0: Mayor Cox was
not present for the vote.)
The Council at this point discussed the financing issue. Mr.
Goss stated that the strategy he prefers to use in building a
. library is that it is done incrementally. The land is saved and
a foot-print is provided for the ultimate library but it is done
in increments as the ability to pay for construction and
operation come in to play.
Councilmember Malcolm noted concern that he has a potential
conflict of interest due to property he owns near the proposed
library site. The requested appropriation of funds requires
4/5ths vote and only four council members are present. City
Attorney Boogaard stated it would be necessary to determine that
. '.
Citv Council Minutes
-3-
Aucrust 16. 1990
there is a legally required "becessity for Mr. Malcolm's
participation.
Director of Library Lane stated the pre-application deadline for
the grant is November 21. It is followed quickly by a very
sophisticated application due February 15. That application
includes schematics and an elevation of the building. It is
necessary to begin immediately in order to meet the deadlines.
Mr. Boogaard stated' it is his opinion that legally required
participation for Councilmember Malcolm would be operable if Mr.
Malcolm would desire to participate.
Responding to questions, Ms. Lane stated staff decided that the
grant request should consider a site in the southern part of the
City because there is no other source of funding for the library
in the south. There are Development Impact Fees as a source of
funding available for the library in the east.
Ms. Lane further reported that the existing two branches in .the
southern part of the City cost approximately $100,000 per year to
operate. It is estimated that the cost for operating the new
proposed library would be approximately +$1,000,000 per year.
Mr. Goss stated the funding for the operation of the library
would have to come out of the General Fund. As revenues grow
(from sales .t~x and property tax), it is anticipated that
decisions will be made giving priorities to the General Fund to
support the library. As new development occurs, this will pay
for the services provided to the area.
Ms. Lane stated the people who. are administering the grant have
made it clear that the bigger library (in size) proposed in the
application, the better chances of obtaining a grant. They will
favor proposals with higher square footage per capita.
Councilmember Nader questioned if consideration had been given to
making the library part of a larger redevelopment project that
could include commercial ventures and, perhaps through a joint
venture with a private developer, it may be possible to gain some
of the revenues needed to operate the library. Ms. Lane
responded that the grant is contingent on a library being on the
site alone. Mr. Goss noted the existing library has a book stop
that is run by the Friends of the Library. Something that could
be contemplated is a coffee house, book store, video store; the
question being could parts of the library be rented for
commercial ventures in order to have more interaction and more of
a dynamic area as well as receive revenue. 'Councilmember Nader
stated this may be something to look at; suggesting that this
option be made available in directions given to the architect.
, .
~tv Council Minutes
-4-
Auaust 16. 1990
-,
Responding to further questions, Ms-... Lane stated no
will be given to the financial need of the
determining the cities that will receive the grant.
library services will be the criteria.
Mayor Cox stated he is not convinced that the Fourth and Orange
Avenue site is, the best site. From a phasing stand point it may
be more desirable to consider the Lauderbach site.
consideration
community in
The need for
Responding to questions, Mr. Goss stated he was advised by the
previous City Attorney that Development Impact Fees from the
eastern part of the City cannot be diverted to fund a library in
the southe.rn part.
Ms. Lane stated it is necessary to have a definite site with a
marketable title by February 15, 1991. The site must be
purchased or at least have an "option to buy" by February 15. If
the whole site is not designated for the library, then the City
is restricted to using only the portion that has been designated
for the library.
Councilmember Malcolm questioned how much is anticipated to be
spent out of the General Fund to build the library. Mr. Goss
responded in terms of the capital project itself, it is unsure at
this time what the amount will be, however, it is the goal that
no amount of the General Fund would be spent. He suggested that
Community DeveJ,opment Block Grant funds could be used for the
grounds, and Gas Tax funds or Sales Tax funds for street
improvements.
MOTION
Councilmember Moore moved that funds not be appropriated for the
consideration of a library at the Lauderbach site.
Motion died for lack of a second.
Mayor Cox noted that the dilemma is that if the Council
appropriates these funds to develop plans for a library, these
plans would not have any great degree of applicability to any
other site in the event the grant is not obtained. Ms. Lane
stated that is correct, the plans would be site-specific. Mayor
Cox asked what is the level of comfort that given the interest in
the grant and the comparatively modest amount of money that is
available on a state wide basis that the City of Chula Vista's
application will be successful. Mr. Goss stated he believes the
chances of being successful are 1 in 3.
I
~tv Council Minutes
-5-
Auaust 16. 1990
'..
Mayor Cox stated it is his person~l opinion that the Lauderbach
site would be the preferable site because it would be possible to
move forward with the implementation of the park at Fourth and
Orange, build a community center as a part of the park, and move
the Lauderbach operation over there. Lauderbach is a better site
for a library because it is closer to commercial uses, it is in a
good location, also noting there may be an effort to try and put
too much on the Fourth and Orange site.
Ms. Lane stated the problem with the Lauderbach site in terms of
the grant is that the City does not have a marketable title to
the land because it is all dedica~ed park land.
Councilmember Nader commented that in light of staff I s
recommendation and the recommendations of three commissions, he
is inclined to support Orange and Fourth Avenue as the site for
the library. His hesitation about this site' is the issue of
electromagnetic radiation. He also noted a concern that
potentially too many uses are being crowded onto this site. He
suggested that if the Orange and Fourth site is selected for the
library that some of the other uses being contemplated for this
site be moved to Lauderbach.
Mayor Cox asked that in preparing the architectural plans if
there is a way to build in flexibility to allow the plans to be
modified in order to use them on another site in the event the
city does not'.~eceive this grant, suggesting this be made a part
of the contract for the architectural services.
Ms. Lane stated the programming element of the library can be
transferred from one site to another, however, when it comes to
orienting the building to the site, it is very site specific.
Mr. Joe Berlanga of the Montgomery Planning Committee commented
regarding the electromagnetic radiation issue. He stated he is
an electrician and that there are some health risks associated
with the power lines. However, it is necessary for an individual
to be very close to the power lines with high induction in order
for it to be a health risk. He stated the proposed library would
not present a problem. By using the area under the power lines
for parking there should not be a problem. It would be necessary
to be under the lines all day long in order for it to be harmful.
Mr. Berlanga stated the Lauderbach site would not be a good site
because it already has a bad traffic problem. From the beginning
the Montgomery Planning Committee has felt that the Orange and
Fourth site is the best site for the proposed library.
Ms. Lee Wheeland,
Council to choose
proposed library.
Montgomery Planning Committee, urged the
the Orange and Fourth Avenue site for the
She noted the Montgomery Planning Committee
.
"-
~tv Council Minutes
-6-
Auaust 16. 1990
has discussed this issue at len~-and they have arrived at the
conclusion that the Orange and Fourth site is the best site.
Responding to questions of Councilmember Malcolm, Ms. Wheeland
stated that the Montgomery Planning COlllJllittee discussed closing
the Otay Library Branch and leaving the Woodlawn Library Branch
open.
Mr. Tony Castro, Montgomery Planning COlllJllittee, also stated the
Orange and Fourth Avenue site is preferable to the Lauderbach
site. The Lauderbach site would entail dealing with
approximately 3 dozen property owners, whereas the Orange and
Fourth property would entail dealing with only 3 property owners.
Mr. Castro further COlllJllented that the tax base is increasing in
this area of the city because of turn over of property that is
occurring. Also, the prospect of the formation of a
Redevelopment Project Area is this part of the city will aid in
funding.
MAYOR COX OFFERED THE APPROPRIATION PORTION OF THE RESOLUTION,
the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent.
Mayor Cox stated in the discussions regarding architectural
services he would like maximum flexibility to be provided in the
plans. There is a need to have the ability to have a set of
plans that in the event the grant is not received, the City can
realistically-look at trying to phase in some type of a branch
library. It is his expectation that the existing branch library
on Third Avenue south of Orange would be closed and consolidated
with this branch. The Woodlawn Branch. is not viewed as a
significant issued related to this library.
Councilmember Malcolm noted concern that the bidding process for
architectural services is being waived. It is unfortunate that
it is a large amount of money, unfortunate that the bid is being
waived, and unfortunate the bid is submitted without having to
compete and negotiate. Because of the timing, he will vote in
favor of appropriating the funds but he does not like this
situation.
Mr. Goss stated it is unfortunate that the City has been given a
short turn-around time by the State. He noted this is not
generally a job that every architectural firm would be able to
respond to because there is certain specialty requirements in
terms of designing libraries and also knowledge of the state
requirements. The recolllJllended firm has experience in both areas.
Responding to questions, Mr. Blackman of Wheeler, Wimer, Blackman
and Associates, stated he has negotiated with Ms. Lane on the
bid. He pointed out that of the requested funds, approximately
.-
,"
. .
}
.
"
"
Citv Counci~nutes
-7-
Auaust 16. 1990
$67,000 is allocated for design 'services, and the rest is for the
application process, the building program process, site and
utility data analysis, etc.
Councilmember Nader suggested negotiating a contract with the
architectural firm under which if for any reason the City decides
to abandon the application, that the city would be obligated to
pay only for work performed up to that stage.
AMENDMENT '1'0 RESOLU'l'ION CONCERNING APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS
HSUC (Nader/Malcolm) amend the resolution to make the
appropriation conditional on a, '1'ime and Materials Contract
whereby if for any reason the City determines to withdraw its
application to the State, the City would be obligated only
partially for the amount of the contract.
VOTE ON RESOLUTION CONCERNING APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS AS AMENDED
'1'he appropriation part of the resolution passed and was approved
unanimously.
Councilmember Malcolm left the room at 6:45 p.m.
'1'HE BALANCE OF '!'HE RESOLU'I'ION WAS OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the
reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent.
-
AMENDMENT '1'0 BALANCE OF '1'HE RESOLUTION
MSC (Nader/Malcolm) amend the resolution to direct staff to
negotiate with the architect to specify in the contract that the
design should (1) minimize potential exposure of library patrons
to electromagnetic radiation on the site, (2) leave open the
possibility of future business development or ventures around or
within the library site, and (3) include a phasing plan in the
event the grant is not received. (The vote was 3-0;
Councilmember Malcolm was not present for the vote.)
VOTE ON '!'HE BALANCE OF '!'HE RESOLUTION AS AMENDED
'1'he resolution as amended passed and was approved. (The vote was
3-0; Councilmember Malcolm was not present for the vote.)
'1'he Council recessed at 6:50 p.m. '1'he meeting reconvened at 7:00
p.m.
Mr. Goss stated staff would like direction from Council regarding
the master plan. It is .recommended that the Council select the
plan that includes a library and community center.
~
, .
. : I'"
~itv Council Minutes
-8-
Auaust 16. 1990
Responding to questions, Ms. Lane -stated there is more traffic on
Orange Avenue providing higher visibility for the library. She
also noted that for the grant the library should be separate from
the community center. Preference will be given to libraries that
stand out independently.
Responding to Councilmember Nader's questions, Mr. Goss stated
the architect needs to know the location and orientation of the
library, the other public facilities, such as the recreation
center, could be de.signated as "possible futu,re other public
facilities" thereby enabling the policy makers to make decisions
on that in the future.
Mayor Cox. suggested designating the 18,000 square feet for the
community facility as "future community use" with the parking for
that facility to be under the SDG&E easement.
MOTrON
MSC (Cox/Nader) accept Alternative 1 as the initial concept site
plan for the library building. (The vote was 3-0, Member Malcolm
was not present for the vote.)
MSC (Cox/Nader) refer the issue of the name of the facility to
the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Library Commission and
the Library Board of Trustees for their input and recommendation
back to Council. (The vote was 3-0, Member Malcolm was not
present for the-vote.)
4. ORAL COMMUNrcATrONS: None.
5. CrTY MANAGER'S REPORT: None.
6. MAYOR'S REPORT: None.
7. COUNcrL COMMENTS: None.
ADJOURNMENT at 7:17 p.m. to TUesday, August 21, 1990 at 6:00 p.m.
)A..~~ "~h_
Sandra Chase
Recording Secretary
(Minutes\CounciI2)
~.-----. .-
ljtJt- A v. & /JI!;
,
I
[JD 0\ \ , I
I! .
Ie - ,
I
J
~ ~~ f 0'
! I.! 0\ ,
t~~ h \ '
~~ ~ ~! ~i 0\ II
{S \2:. l
I.... { r:
.~
i~
')
)
)
; .~
)
,.. ,
I .~ :! .~. ~ . ..
d f-t ~ '"
1, t t.. )-~ ~
t t. !~ ,~' :1.
" ~H P ~ ~
. . . ~f ~t.
_ .t-:
~ -
4:
.' }~r.,
~
~...
" ,. '
wwD
"i
<(
III
i ~ 1
o
~.
. . .
. .
.)
)
"
'..' .'. ."... , ~~. ..""t.!...'1
- . .-"- - -"
,.
ATTACHMENT B
MINUTES OF THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
Chula Vista, California
7:01 p.m.
Wednesday, .January 2, 1991
Lauderbach Community Center
333 Oxford Street, Chula Vista
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Wheeland, Committee Members Berlanga,
Creveling, McFarlin, Castro
EXCUSED ABSENCE:
Committee Members Palmer and Roberts
UNEXCUSED ABSENCE: None.
STAFF PRESENT:
Frank J. Herrera-A, Associate Planner; Luis
Hernandez, Assistant Planner; David Harris,
Community Development Specialist; Rosemary Lane,
Library Director .
1.
Oral Communications
None
2.
Old Business
None
3.
As.
Review of Conceotual Plans for the Librarv to be Built at Fourth Avenue
and Orance Street under the Guidelines of State Grant
Rosemary Lane, Library Director noted that the packet the Committee members
received was Quite detailed in its presentation of how far along this was in the
process. That the state has $75 million in funds and that we are going to the
next phase, which is the application. Chula Vista is ranked 15 out of 104 other
cities in the state seeking funds, which is a very good ranking, and there is only
one building in Southern California (in Los Angeles) ranked higher than Chula
Vista's, so we are ranked second in Southern California. It is our belief that we
have a very good chance, at this point, based on the application that Is in your
packet-that is all that has been done to date. If the state funded the 14
applications ahead of Chula Vista, there would still be enough funds left to fund
Chura Vista's library building. We will be making another submittal in February
and a final rendering will be given in April 1991. Given this, we do not think
we will be able to go out with an Request for Proposal fot architectural
drawings until June or July 1991.
Richard Blackman, of the architectural firm of Wheeler-Wimer-Blackman, gave
a brief history of his firm's history. This project would be the 13 library project
for his firm. The firm was the architect for the Chula Vista Main Library. The
proposed library at Fourth Avenue and Orange Street is planned to be a 35,000
square foot building, containing a literacy center, adult and children's libraries,
-1-
.
"
( !
.~,
,
,
.
special space for young adults, study rooms, conference rooms, and a
technology resource center. The style we chose to create for this building is
a bi-national library--a massive building, broken up into smaller elements
through use of color. One of the special features is a permanent art gallery.
It was asked if the colors shown on the rendering were the colors. Mr.
Blackman stated no, that the colors on the rendering were used to better
illustrate the concept of breaking the massiveness of the building into smaller
components.
One committee member took issue with the young adult center as explained,
they had a problem with a laser, disco-type facility. Mr. Blackman responded
that they are trying to create a space that would attract young people to the
library facility, that this is not the final, selected idea, but just a suggestion.
The committee wished to know when would be the best and appropriate time
to bring in the community to get their input. Rosemary 'Lane interjected that
first, Chula Vista had to go through the next stage, the grant process, before
anything was certain. When assured of funding, then the drawings would be
prepared and community input would be sought. The community will be given .
many, many opportunities to give input.
Mr. Blackman stated that the state wants showcase type library buildings--
something they can be proud of, show off as to what can be done. The
building must be a showpiece. The' grant is.D21 based on need or economy.
It is based on having a library that will be an example for rest of state to build.
We believe the bi-nationallibrary concept as shown in the rendering is such a
building. '
Mr. Blackman reiterated that in order not to lose ground, the library building
must be a real showpiece. Mr. Blackman explained that his firm has taken
direction from the Library Board and library staff. There has not been time to
have a great deal of input from others, e.g., community input. The work that
has been completed to-date had to be completed in order to meet the grant
deadline. Also, February 15 Is the drop dead date for the application-that
means we have to have the whole thing basically designed and we have to get
the City Council to approve this to give their Intent to go for the grant.
A number of committee members had specific concerns that dealt with such
topics as: a flat roof, graffiti, community Input, youth 'music center,
community center, nearness of the SDG&E power lines, landscaping, drought
tolerant plants, musical amphitheater, parking. aesthetically pleasing building
colors, and the like. These items were discussed in a preliminary manner, with
the understanding that during the architectural drawing process these questions
would be looked at specifically and that the Committee would have input and
have their questions answered in greater detail.
-2-
.
-
_.__u____ ______ __.___ .___ ._. "_'___n
lJ
One of the committee members asked that once the grant was approved. was
Chula Vista locked into this design. Mr. Blackman noted that there are many
changes that are made throughout the process, that there is a lot of flexibility,
that they will work with every department in the City. seek community input
and will bring this back to this Commission throughout the process.
Mr. Jack Nakawatase. of Ona Associates. presented the landscape proposal for
the library. Pointing to the renderings. he explained the concept of the layout
of the various plantings. trees. paving which conforms to ~e outline of the
building. and the use of green space. He mentioned that th'iltr ,x,5illd be access
for the physically Impaired. He pointed out that the plants would be drought
tolerant. there would be xereiscaping. the use of evergreens to frame the site.
the use of green space was minimal. but was such that it tied the whole
concept to the library building.
MOTION
Accept negative declaration as presented.
[Castro/Creveling] 5-0-2. approved.
MOTION
Committee recommends accepting conceptual presentation.
[McFarlin/Castro] 5-0-2, approved.
3.
a..
Communitv Develooment-Block Grant Prooram
David Harris, Community Development Specialist, noted that when he made a
presentation before this Committee last March or April (1990). it was requested
that he return from time to time and given an update on status of the
programs. I am here to do that and will be bring to your attention that there
Is a consideration for a loan application to the federal government to fund a
project that Is not in Montgomery. but that will affect Montgomery projects.
The projects. briefly:
. Fourth Avenue and Orange Street--Community Development is
working on acquiring the properties and we have a purchase
agreement with the property owner on the Fourth. Avenue side
and escrow will be opening very shortly and close quickly. We
are negotiating with the church for purchase of their property.
The church is willing to move, but wants to be relocated to a
comparable facility. At present they have about two acres. If any
committee member has an idea of a suitable location. Community
Development would like your suggestions. There is a third parcel,
which is not too expensive. being negotiated at this time. We
need to have this completed by February 1 so the Library can go
forward with grant application.
-3-
.:
- - --~-- _.~._._. -
II
'-)
"
. Shy Lane--complete, except for punch list items. These Items are
being worked on. Project totaled about $300,000.
. Fifth Avenue-wL W Street to Naples Avenue-has been awarded to
Southland Paving. Relocation of utilities complete by mid-March.
Street Improvements will then start.
. Fifth Avenue (second part of projectl-Naples Avenue to Orange
Street--hopefully going out to bid in March 1991.
. Drainage projects-under design and are expected to be bid in the
Spring.
. C.I.P. project on Fourth Avenue and Moss for sidewalks.
. Normal Park Senior Center-some projects have been deferred
because the Norman Park Senior Center has close to $1,000,000
of CDBG funding. Bids came in at $2.3 million to $2.5 million.
Parks and Recreation only had about $1 million to fund the
project.
In this regard Community Development is considering a federal Section 108
loan--borrowing $750,000 @ 9% interest for 3 years, loan fees of $11,250.
Use CDBG allocation up-ffont for repayment of loan. City Council has indicated
that they would like to apply for this loan but wants Input from Montgomery
Planning Committee. It takes about three months to get approval and up to 12
months to fund. There Is an Interim loan available at 8%-9%. If federal
government decides to not fund the CDBG, then the loan Is forgiven. It was
explained that the percentage of the CDBG fund used to repay the loan would
reduce the amount of money available for other City projects.
The committee members thought that the percentage of total funds available
for all City projects would then be very low.
Mr. Harris explained that Community Development could go for a longer-term
loan and for a larger amount. However, the length of the loan is dependent
upon the size of the loan. He noted, also, that Community Development could
make one request for multiple projects. He Informed the Committee that
hearings for input will be held in March or April. Mr. Harris noted that
Community Development can apply for six times our annual entitlement with
the new legislation. CDBG funds could be looked at for the Woodlawn Park
improvements, but no CDBG funds are being used for individual dwelling units-
Redevelopment Agency has money to do this kind of thing--but there are a
combination of projects that can be put together. Mr. Harris also discussed the
MADD Project Family Shelter-a facility in the South Bay for transltionally
homeless families. Looking for site and they: will need funding from City. This
would be for acquisition of property and renovation of property. It will house
-4-
LI \ )
about 12 to 15 families for upwards to one year. It would need to be near
transportation.
One committee member thought it might be a good idea to put a loan package
together that could go for a 20 year payback.
MOTION
Montgomery Committee encourages seeking a 20-year payback for the federal
Section 108 loan and having Community Development try to package it with
other projects.
[Creveling/Wheeland] 5-0-2, approved.
4. Other Business. None
5. Chair's Report - None
6. Committee Comments - None
ADJOURNMENT AT 9:05 P.M. to the Workshop on Wednesday, January 16, 1991
at 6:30 p.m. in the Civic Center.
'-:&d;...,d. ~
Berlin D. Bosworth, Recording Secretary
IC\MONT-MTG.WP)
-5-
-
ATTACHMENT C
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
of the
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES AND PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
JANUARY 9, 1991
LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM
4:00 PM
LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Miller, Vice Chair
Williams, Trustee Donovan
Trustees Viesca (excused)
Trustee Alexander (ill)
LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Vice Chairman Hall,
Commissioners Lind and Willett
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez,
Commissioner Roland
CITY STAFF PRESENT:
Library Director Lane, Assistant Director
Palmer, Deputy City Manager Thomson, Jess
Valenzuela, Director of Parks and
Recreation, Shauna Stokes, Senior
Management Assistant
,
Library Board Chairman, Suzanne Miller, informed all present that'
this meeting was being held to consider the conceptual plans for
a 35,000 square foot Library at Orange and Fourth Avenues as
presented by architectural firm, Wheeler, Wimer, Blackinan and
Associates.
Library Director, Rosemary Lane, detailed the changes made in the
architect's drawings since the last time the Library Board and
Parks and Recreation Commission had viewed them. These changes
included recommendations from the Library Board, the Parks and
Recreation Commission and the Montgomery Planning Committee as we!'l
as input from city staff. The drawings were prepared to apply for
grant funds to build a library and do not show a proposed community
center, gymnasium, amphitheater and park land to be added at a
later date. The ~ontgomery Planning Committee unanimously voted
to support this project.
She also reported that since meeting in December, the State
Librarian wrote the letter enclosed in the packets, that shows
Chula Vista is "very competitive" ranking 15th out of 104 pre-
applications. The Library Director attended a Proposition 85
Workshop on January 7th in Sacramento where Chula Vista's "Changing
Concepts in Library Services" and its "Needs Assessment" sections
J
i
.
,
JOINT MEETING
- 2 -
JANUARY 9, 1991
of the Pre-application were used as good examples for other
libraries.
Commissioner Willet asked what other options were planned if grant
funds do not materialize. Director Lane responded that if Chula
Vista does not receive these grant funds, the Chula Vista 21
Committee may recommend a bond election to build a library plus
recreational facilities on this site.
Commissioner Willet asked if the City was still negotiating with
SDG&E to use the land beneath the power lines and how this land
was going to be used: i.e., passive park, parking or jogging and
horse trails.
Deputy city Manager Thomson responded that the City Manager's
office is negotiating with SDG&E to use this land. If the grant
application is funded and the agreement with SDG&E approved, the
parking lot would be reconfigured to make maximum use of the site.
Mr. Willet's concerns were twofold: 1) the cost of paving and
landscaping that would be demolished when a future community center
and 2) the possibility of leakage and leaf accumulation on the
library's flat roof. He cited problems with the Chamber of.
Commerce building. He believed that buildings should be designed'
with future maintenance costs in mind.
Deputy City Manager Thomson reported that this project was slated
to go before the Design Review Committee on January 10, 1991 at
which time the plans would be reviewed from an architectural point
of view.
In answer to Mr. Willet's concerns, Richard Blackman responded that
the building will be surrounded with heavy cobblestones and prickl;-
bushes to deter graffiti and to prevent people from climbing onto
the roof. Any trees near the building will be tall and slender ip
nature and will not drop leaves on the roof. There is a flat
roofing product the firm has used successfully at Sharp-Cabrillo
Hospital for the past ten years with no maintenance or leakage
problems. Also, since there will be no equipment on the roof that
demands servicing, ,there is no need for anyone to walk on the roof.
Walking causes most flat roof damage.
Commissioner Hall asked if
architecturally compatible
library.
it would be difficult to design an
Community Center adjacent to the
Richard Blackman replied that the proposed library building has
been designed for possible linkage with another building. An area
at one corner of the building would serve as a transition point
when joined to another building. A footprint of this community
center on the site was shown at the December Parks and Recreation
Commission meeting.
I
JOINT MEETING
- 3 -
JANUARY 9, 1991
Mr. Willet asked if the entrances into the parking area could be
indented to allow for a shallower turn into the parking lot or a
turning pocket added to allow busses and cars to enter and leave
the lot safely. Mr. Blackman replied that the drawing was prepared
with preliminary information from the city's Engineering Department
on ingress and egress to the lot. If the project is funded, the
Engineering Department will prepare a more in-depth study of
traffic in the area and alter the design to accommodate these
considerations.
(Vice Chairman Ron williams arrived at 4:53 pm.)
Commissioner Hall asked that the record show he is concerned that
the Parks and Recreation element at this site may be abandoned
because of restrictions that mayor may not be imposed based upon
the library grant. He is concerned because, no matter what the
library needs for this area are, there is also an equal need for
a Parks and Recreation element in this area.
Library Chair Miller agreed his point was well taken. She
reassured him that the Library Board members have never lost sight
of the fact that this is a joint proj ect. The Library has an
opportunity to obtain funding to build its portion first.
Commissioner Hall stated that it was unfortunate the librarY and
community center could not be built all at once. He suggested
that the respective Board and Commission suggest this to Council.
Commissioner Willett commented that the footprint of the building
has exceeded the square footage that his Commission had seen under
the POD study. He suggested reducing the footprint of the building
and going up two or three stories. This would allow ample space
for a future community center and gymnasium. Board members and the
Library Director replied that over a long term, multi-story
buildings are much more expensive to staff. Such a design on six
acres would probably not make our application competitive. ,
Deputy City Manager Thomson mentioned that there is only a limited
amount of General Fund money available and a major need for both
parks and libraries in the area. As money becomes available
through the State Grant to help with part of those needs, it makes
it easier to build the other needs.
Chairman Miller committed Library Board support to the Parks and
Recreation commissions plans for a community center in this area.
Commissioner Hall stated that it behooves this project to have this
Parks and Recreation Community Center built with the library. If
the State decides to fund this project, the Parks and Recreation
Commission will take this to Council to suggest that the recreation
component be built in conjunction with the library.
"
.
JOINT MEETING
- 4 -
JANUARY 9, 1991
Chair Miller suggested if notification of the grant approval is
received in April, both committees go to Council in support of the
Community Center.
Commissioner Willet was concerned that the state Library might
restrict the building of a community center on the same lot.
Richard Blackman agreed that it is possible for the State Library
to impose restrictions on the site. The award will be made on
mul tiple issues. Some of these are going to change as the
information process goes along because the plans are at a
preliminary stage now.
Sue Miller asked for separate votes from the Parks and Recreation
Commission and the Library Board.
Director Lane reported that Commissioner Roland had called her
office and asked that she convey that he is in favor of whatever
the city can do to put a library at Fourth and Orange.
Library Board Chair Miller polled her Board members:
MSUC (Donovan/Williams) to accept the negative declaration
issued by the city's Environmental Review Coordinator.
MSUC (Williams/Donovan) to recommend to Council the conceptual
plans for the 35,000 square foot library as presented by the'
architectural firm, Wheeler, Wimer, Blackman and Associates.
Parks and Recreation Vice Chair Hall polled his Commission members:
MSUC (Willet/Lind) to accept the report as presented by the
city's Environmental Review Coordinator.
MSUC (Willet/Lind) to support and accept the conceptual plans
as agreed to and voted on by the Library Board.
,
The Library Director will take the recommendations of the Library
Board and the Parks and Recreation Commission to the City Council
on January 22, 1991.
Both the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Library Board will
address asking Council for a Community Center on this site at their
next Board and Commission meeting.
The meeting was adjourned at 5:29 pm.
I
:
ATTACHMENT D
I
"
.'
,
January 17, 1991
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Fourth and Orange Avenue Park site
Dear Honorable Mayor and city Council:
The Parks and Recreation Commission members wish to express our
concerns regarding the development of the Fourth and Orange Avenue
site. As Council may recall, the Commission originally supported
a concept plan showing a passive park, small amphitheater,
community center/gymnasium, library and 50 meter pool (if it could
be accommodated) at this site. However, it is our understanding
that the Council did not adopt the master plan, but instead, chose
to defer action on the park pending the outcome of a state Library
Grant application for a library ~t this site.
OUr Commission wholly supports the submittal of the grant
application and approved the proposed library site plan at a
special joint meeting with the Library Board of Trustees on January
9, 1991. We understood that, for the purposes of the grant
application, no parkland could be shown, and only those parcels for
which the City had ownership or had plans to acquire ownership in
the near future could be included. Therefore, the library plan
that we approved did not show any park or recreation facilities,
nor did it include the parcel owned by San Diego Gas and Electric
(SDG&E), since the city and SDG&E have not reached an agreement
regarding development of this parcel.
The Commission would like to formally convey to the City Council
three concerns and recommendations regarding this site.
First, regardless of the outcome of the library grant application,
the Commission would like to make clear that the development of a
park remains critical. It appears that development of a park has
taken a back seat to the development of a library. our Commission
members are very concerned that construction of a park continue to
be pursued equally with the construction of a library. As you are
well aware, the Montgomery area is extremely lacking in park space.
We want to make sure that the Fourth and Orange Avenue site does
I
,
, ,
"
not become a library exclusively, as this would not address the
area's park needs.
Second, we consider development of a community center/gymnasium to
be of utmost importance at this site. The entire City has only one
gymnasium to serve a growing population of 130,000 residents. We
realize that plans are underway to build gymnasiums and community
centers in the growing area east of I-80S. We also know that a
community youth center will be under construction shortly at Chula
Vista High School. However, the facilities to the east will not
serve the Montgomery area. The youth center will provide limited
access, since it will be used considerably by the school district
and will Berve only the youth in the community and not adults. We
realize that ~unding of such a major recreation facility at Fourth
and Orange Avenue will be an issue and we would support pursuing a
bond issue to fund its construction.
Third, we ask that the City aggressively negotiate with SDG&E to
secure the use of their parcel. This parcel could provide space
~or parking for the library and future community center/gym and
passive park area. With the inclusion of this area, the library
site plan could be redesigned to take this parcel into account to
provide greater space for a community center/gym and park area in
the future. The library's architect has stated that a redesign
could easily be achieved ~or a compatible use. .
Thank you for your consideration of these issues. We are confident
we can continue to work with the Library Board of Trustees and
Montgomery Planning Committee to help plan for a noteworthy
community complex at Fourth and Orange Avenue, that will be the
pride of the Montgomery area and the entire city.
Sincerely,
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
carmen Sandoval-Fernandez, Chair
cc: John D. Goss, city Manager
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation
,/
~~r~
Z~-::
.................. .......
.............--.........
~ -
ATTACHMENT E
/
/
.I"
(I'IV Of
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
,
/....;;-
-
,
,;
.r
/
June 12, 1991
Frank Tarantino :
1006 paseo Del Paso
Chula vista, CA 91910
Dear Chairman:
The first annual gathering of the city of Chula Vista boards and
commissions was held in the newly refurbished Chamber of Commerce
Board Room on Wednesday, May 29. Twenty-three commissions were
represented and were' joined by the President of the Chamber of
Commerce and several members of the Executive Committee Vice
Presidents.
There was a lively exchange of concerns among the attendees. A
common consensus by all, which I believe is very noteworthy, is
the interest to continue these meetings on a semi-annual basis.
While we all know communication is important, the key to good
communication is the ultimate use of the information that was
voiced. Much of the information disseminated was of interest to
one or more commissions. It was emphasized by a number of those
present at the meeting, that joint meetings of boards and com-
missions or their chairs were to be considered.
The following is a list of the many thoughts presented which I
. consider of value to the policy makers of our city.
A. Graffiti
1. Consider a curfew until a strong retention, disciplinary
action and eradication program is in place.
2. Night bike patrol in conjunction with apprehension of
-taggers", etc.
B. Recreation Expansion of:
1. Ensure Fourth and orange Avenue Library site includes a
. park, sorely needed in southwest Chula Vista.
2. Bond issue potential to expedite parks on west side
(CV 21).
.,
C. Semi-Annual Status Report (state of the City as pertains to
committee purpos~s) to all Chairman by the Mayor (city major
issues).
271 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 81810/(818) 881-5044
.,
D. Airport
1. Council be Eore active and expand political forces in our
. behalf.
E. Free Trade Issue
1. Have concept reviewed in depth as to pro/con. (Chula
Vista Economic Deyelopment Commission).
F. Manufacturers
1. Closer liaison with them to enhance, retention and
expansion.
G. City Council
1. More referrals to the committees for review, comments and
recommendations.
H. DIF
1. Should eastern development assist funding the west's re-
creational facilities?
I. Need
1. If Council believes one or Eore specific facilities are
in Eajor demand and be a major asset to City, communicate
the need, package the funding method and bring it to a
vote. If really needed and thoroughly explained, voters
will probably support the cost.
J. Affordable Housing
1. Ensure not out of balance in anyone or Eore sections of
the city.
I sincerely appreciate the time, comments and attitudes you pre~
sented. I will pursue a number of your recommendations as I hope
you will Eine. The idea of having this type of gathering on a (,
semi-annual basis will be presented to our new Mayor and it is'
most likely we will set up a similar meeting in October or Novem-
ber, prior to the Annual Boards and Commissions Banquet.
On behalf of the City Council, please pass the word to your mem-
bers of the deep appreciation of your time and effort on behalf
of our wonderful city.
(
(
Yours in Co~~unity Service,
~rd M. Moore
Mayor pro Tempore
LLM:NW:dv
II
cc: Secretary - Elderly' Handicapped Transportation Adv.
CrTY O~ CHLJl" \.'1~1I.
.
I
I
. rn
I~ u .-.
e ! ~
z
i I
Ii I
- t I
fOIJRtll ,.~~~E - .----------
,
,
f
. i i1
. i
. .
,
!
i
J ,nr<rJM I
I
I
.
a J.N4HH::JVJ.J.V
I
;.
.. J
.
4
~
~
\
II
\.
(
11
(.
, .
!
'j ~
t ~
..
It d
ih ;~
W,Hj
l.JLJU l
~
a ~ ATTACHMENT G
~~.~ " "
~s i" ~ ~~
.t h 4 ..
, f;t : {~
J~ ~I 1 d
Q ~~~
Q .:~
; --~
.
. '
I. '
~
~
C ~
" C ~ ~
1=:<
,~
8c:
~~
" [~
L~(];~ ~
I rJ)
t8
-~
o
~
.~
f2
.-
-
....C
'q
. '
c-
~l
'1'(
.:;II\;
,
-.
"",..1'''
-
~I
I~
ht
.m.lt ORANGE SITE: ALTERNATIVE 12 - "EASEMENT" ATTACHMENT G
,
COST ESTIMATE
1.
f ITEM APPRO X. ITEMS WIm UNIT PRICE WRITTEN PRICE IN TOTAL
Qn'. IN WORDS FIGURES
1 LUMP SUM Consultant Services: Design/Drawings
1 20,000 $20,000
LUMP SUM L.S.
2 177,500S.F. Site Preparation/Selective Demolition
and Clearing and Grubbing
177,500 0.10 $17,750
AREA S.F.
3 177,500 S.F. Earthwork
177,500 0.20 $35,500
AREA S.F.
. 16,000 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Paving
16,000 2.50 $40,000
AREA S.F.
5 14,610 S.F. Walkways
14,610 3.00 $43,830
AREA S.F.
6 900 S.F. Integral Color Concrete Paving
900 4.00 $3,600
AREA S.F.
7 760 L.F. Concrete Curb and Gutter
760 6.50 $4,940
PER LINEAR FOOT L.F.
8 LUMP SUM Concrete Steps w / Handrails
40,000.00 1 $40,000
LUMP SUM l L.S.
9 175 L.F. 6" Concrete Mow Curb
175 6.50 $1,138
PER LINEAR FOOT L.F.
10 LUMP SUM Site Drainage System
1 7500.00 $7,500
LUMP SUM L.S.
~
J;TEM APPROX. ITEMS WIlli UNIT PRICE WRI1TEN PRICE IN
, QTY. IN WORDS FIGURES
11 157,385 S.F. Irrigation (includes meter, backflow
preventer and oontroUer)
157,385 0.85 $133,777
AREA S.F.
12 SEA. Trash Receplacles
500.00 S . $2,soo
PER EACH EA
13 lEA Hot Ash Receptacle
500.00 1 $500
PER EACH EA.
14 2 EA. Drinking Fountain
1500.00 2 $3,000
PER EACH EA.
15 4 EA. Concrete Picnic Table and Seats
2500.00 4 $10,000
PER EACH EA.
16 4 EA. Concrete Bench
750.00 4 $3,000
PER EACH EA
17 4 EA. Picnic Shelter
5000.00 4 $20,000
LUMP SUM LS.
18 15738S S.F. Fine Grading
157,385 0.05 $7,869
AREA S.F.
19 157,385 S.F. Soil Preparation
157,385 ( 0.10 $15,739
AREA S.F.
20 Landscaping
TURF . 71,880 0.25 $17,970
AREA S.F.
PLANTING 85,505 2.50 $213,763
AREA S.F.
, ;
. . ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRI1TEN PRICE IN
Q1Y. IN WORDS FIGURES
21 157 ,38S S.F. Maintenance Period - 90 Days
157 ,38S 0.05 $7,869
AREA S.F.
22 2 EA. Signage (includes handicap parking sign)
300.00 2 $600
EACH EA.
23 Contingencies
$63,084
10% OF BUDGET
TOTAL OF ALTERNATIVE 12:
"EASEMENT AREA"
$713,929
{
.
'.
4111 Ie ORANGE SITE: ALTERNATIVE 12 - "EAST SIDE"
COST ESTIMATE
ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WI11I UNIT PRICE WRITTEN
Qn'. IN WORDS
1 LUMP SUM Consultant Services: Design/Drawings
1
LUMP SUM
2 57,200 S.F. Site Preparation/Selective Demolition
and Clearing and Grubbing
57,200
AREA
3 57,200 S.F. Earthwork
57,200
AREA
4 LUMP SUM Thematic Site Walls
4
LUMP SUM
5 4,195 S.F. Walkways
4,195
AREA
6 4,900 S.F. Integral Color Concrete Paving
4,900
AREA -
., LUMP SUM Thematic Seating Platforms
5
LUMP SUM
8 LUMP SUM Site Lighting
1.00
LUMP SUM
{
9 710 L.F.
6" Concrete Mow Curb
710
PER LINEAR FOOT
10 LUMP SUM Site Drainage System
1
LUMP SUM
PRICE IN TOTAL
FIGURES
30,000 $30,000
L.s.
0.10
S.F.
$5,720
0.20
S.F.
$11,440
10000.00
L.S.
$40,000
3.00
S.F.
$12,585
4.00
S.F.
$19,600
15000.00
L.s.
$75,000
30000
L.s.
-$30,000
6.50
L.F.
$4,615
5000.00
L.s.
$5,000
,
,
ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRIlTEN PRICE IN
. QTY. IN WORDS FIGURES .
11 51,900 Irrigation (includes meter, backflow
preventer and oontroller)
51,900 0.85 $44,115
AREA S.F.
12 4 EA. Trash Receptacles
500.00 4 $2,000
PER EACH EA.
13 lEA. Hot Ash Receptacle
500.00 1 $500
PER EACH EA.
14 2 EA. Drinking Fountain
1500.00 2 $3,000
PER EACH EA.
15 3 EA. Concrete PiO\ic Table and Seats
2500.00 3 $7,500
PER EACH EA.
16 3 EA. Concrete Bench
150.00 3 $2,250
PER EACH EA.
17 Picnic Shelter
5000.00 $0
LUMP SUM L.S.
18 51900 S.F. Fme Grading
51,900 0.05 $2,595
AREA S.F.
19 51,900 S.F. Son Preparation
51,900 ( 0.10 $5,190
AREA S.F.
20 Landscaping
TURF 22,800 0.25 $5,700
AREA S.F.
PLANTING 29,100 5.00 $145,500
AREA S.F.
" '
fi'EM APPROX.
QIT.
ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRI1TEN
IN WORDS
PRICE IN
FIGURES
,.
,
21 51,900 S.F. Maintenance Period - 90 Days
51,900
AREA
0.05
S.F.
$2,595
22
Contingencies
10% OF BUDGET
$42,491
TOTAL OF ALTERNATIVE.2:
"EAST SIDE AREA"
$497,396
{
~
"
101
k~
~t
,(
....
WI \I(J
uuU1
.,
I~
'!
'U
il
l
\l
\ I
\.
\I
\
.
It
'II
~
..
(
o
-" ~I
J~
!if
',I
"'..\;
-
f.rJ,..f'rt
ATTACHMENT H
Q,t!
...Oi
!\
..
~t
.....
Itt
:~
"
\
el.#t
t .
.'~
It.....
et:)
=I*:
. . . .
:' ~. . .
~
C ~
C~~
,~...J
~:<
4:1
. 1;=
,
[:
~~
rJ)
~
l?
-~
o
~
~
o
~.
.H r:'
..!
a
"t
..t
l"
.........
'. 4TH &: ORANGE SITE: ALTERNATIVE'3 - "EAST SIDE"
COST ESTIMATE
ATTACHMENT H
ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRITTEN
on. IN WORDS
1 LUMP SUM Consultant Services: Design/Drawings
1
LUMP SUM
2 57,200 S.F. Site Preparation/Selective Demolition
and Clearing and Grubbing
57,200
AREA
3 57,200 S.F. Earthwork
57,200
AREA
4 LUMP SUM Gymnasium
1,800,000
LUMP SUM
5 8,250 S.F. Walkways
8,250
AREA
\
6 LUMP SUM Stairs w / Handrails
1
LUMP SUM
7 LUMP SUM Signage
1
LUMP SUM
8 LUMP SUM Site lighting
1
LUMP SUM
9 220 L.F.
~
6" Concrete Mow Curb
220_
PER LINEAR FOOT
10 LUMP SUM Site Drainage System
1
LUMP SUM
PRICE IN TOTAL
FIGURES
20,000 $20,000
L.S.
0.10
S.F.
0.20
S.F.
1.00
L.S.
3.00
S.F.
25000.00
L.S.
7500.00
L.S.
2??oo
L.S.
6.50
L.F.
5000.00
L.S.
$5,720
$11,440
);''foo~ -=
$24,750
$25,000
$7,500
$20,000
$1,430
$5,000
ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE W1U1TEN PRICE IN
Qn'. IN WORDS FIGURES
11 32,650 Irrigation (includes meter, backflow
preventer and controller)
32,650 0.85 $27,753
AREA S.F.
12 4EA. Trash Receptacles
500.00 4 $2,000
PER EACH EA.
13 1 EA. Hot Ash RecEptacle
500.00 1 $500
PER EACH EA.
14 2 EA. Drinking Fountain
1500.00 2 $3,000
PER EACH EA.
1S 2 EA. Concrete Picnic Table and Seats
2500.00 2 $5,000
PER EACH EA.
16 3 EA. Concrete Bench
750.00 3 $2,250
PER EACH EA.
17 Picnic Shelter
5000.00 $0
LUMP SUM L.5.
18 32650 S.F. Fine Grading
32,650 0.05 $1,633
AREA S.F.
19 32,650 S.F. Soil Preparation
32,650 { 0.10 $3,265
AREA S.F.
20 Landscaping
TURF 10,100 0.25 $2,525
AREA S.F.
PLANTING 22,550 3.50 $78,925
AREA S.F.
.
-.TEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRI1TEN
On'. IN WORDS
PRICE IN
FIGURES
21 32,650 S.F. Maintenance Period - 90 Days
32,650
AREA
0.05
S.F.
$1,633
22
Contingencies
10% OF BUDGET
$202,932
TOTAL OF ALTERNATIVE '3:
"EAST SIDE AREA"
$2,252,255
/r!?'Z %~
, I - '"
(
'/ 4TH.& ORANGE SITE: ALTERNATIVE'3 - "EASEMENT'
. COST ESTIMATE
'.
'. ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRI1TEN PRICE IN TOTAL
Qrr. IN WORDS FIGURES
1 LUMP SUM Consultant ServiteS: Design/Drawings
1 SO,OOO $50,000
LUMP SUM L.5.
2 177,500S.F. Site Preparation/Selective Demolition
and Clearing and Grubbing
177,500 0.10 $17,750
AREA S.F.
3 177,500S.F. Earthwork
177,500 0.20 $35,500
AREA S.F.
4 SO,100 S.F. Asphalt Concrete Paving
SO,100 2.50 $125,250
AREA S.F.
S 12,900 S.F. Walkways
12,900 3.00 $38,700
AREA S.F.
6 LUMP SUM Stairs w / Handrails
1 40000.00 $40,000
LUMP SUM L.5.
7 LUMP SUM Signage
1 7500.00 $7,500
LUMP SUM LS.
8 9,900 S.F. Integral Colored Concrete Paving
9,900 4.00 $39,600
AREA S.F.
(
9 300 LF. 6" Concrete Mow Curb
300 6.50 $1,950
PER LINEAR FOOT L.F.
10 LUMP SUM Site Drainage System
1 7500.00 $7,500
LUMP SUM L.5.
"
\ . ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WIlli UNIT PRICE WRIlTEN PRICE IN
OTY. IN WORDS FIGURES
11 113,550 S.F. Irrigation (includes meter, backflow
preventer and amtroller)
113,550 0.85 $96,518
AREA S.F.
12 4 EA. Trash Receptacles
500.00 4 $2,000
PER EACH EA
13 lEA. Hot Ash Receptacle
500.00 1 $500
PER EACH EA
14 2 EA. Drinking Fountain
1500.00 2 $3,000
PER EACH EA
15 4 EA. Concrete Picnic Table and Seats
2500.00 4 $10,000
PER EACH EA
16 4 EA. Concrete Bench '
750.00 4 $3,000
PER EACH EA.
17 lEA. Picmc Shelter
5000.00 1 $5,000
LUMP SUM LS.
18 113,550 S.F. Fine Grading
113,550 0.05 $5,678
AREA S.F.
19 113,550 S.F. Soil Preparation
113,550 ( 0.10 $11,355
AREA S.F.
20 Landscaping
TURF 33,350 0.25 $8,338
AREA S.F.
PLANTING 80,200 2.50 $200,500
AREA S.F.
.
\ . ITEM APPROX. ITEMS WITH UNIT PRICE WRIlTEN PRICE IN
On'. IN WORDS FIGURES
21 113,550 S.F. Maintenance Period - 90 Days
113,550 0.05 $5,678
AREA S.F.
22 Contingencies
$66,532
10% OF BUDGET
TOTAL OF ALTERNATIVE '3:
"EAST SIDE AREA"
$781,847
l
..
.<::
...
'" :>.
0 '"
.... .,
II) '"
.. ..0
;; .....
....:I
....:I .,
.. ...
~ '"
.....
Eo< >
"" .,
.....
.. :>
II) .<::
0
Po U
0 .<::
'" ...
'" :>
.. 0
.. '"
'"
ti
! 1 ~ .
~ !
. !
U i a
u .
&. ~ .
- .;..i:~
~-
:!
:...-. T 'J T':
ii
J
.- .
Ii Ii I
;;, ;;,
~
..
I
10
..
:::
u
.
. L
.. .
~ i Ii
. ...
u U:
. ! 1: ~.
~ H
.. ~ H
I I~
u .~
n
i~
"ii:
i_
~~ "II
IE
~
~
!~
h
Ii
~-
.
Ii 'U'
t- iE
<<
"-'>.
J-
.g
8-
1-
I~
....:....r
TI. 1
~ i
II I
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. "'Uj... .n.
e ~.
Ii t!
t B.
U- &.~
I __
....:....:p...
: :I
. <<
1
&
..
....I....t.
. Ij
: ::3
: 1-
: H
. ~
........... .
. .
.. .T:....:..
i: :
!": :
. .
. .
.. .
.: :
. . .
n-: :
~ j
i! e i
i; ;1=
il -
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
............... -.- . .
i~
~.
~!
N
..
.!.
..
:::
"
.
. .
,..
~ I Ii ~
.
u .
. ji
~ 1:
.. ~
]1
. .!
ATTACHMENT I
u
-
i~
-
"E
i.
-
!E IT
I.
:1
- .r.
,~
;;;
1!
I
- ...
~
~~
-
If
.
-
J~ IT
.ff.
~ 'n'
h
;:
8- 1!: n
~ 1: ~
Iii:
I-
I-- .:r
~
i~ !
.
.
.
~ ~ 1-
I
~ii:
;;;
~- 1!
1 -
~
I
N
..
:::
"
.
.
..
~ . Ii ~
.
u i
. .
~ ! ji
.. 1:
Ii H
... .!
u
i~
"f
i_
!f
.-
,~
~
~~
Ii
r
f~
<<
h
r
IE
.t-
i~
... .
~~
~!
""~""lr
: .~
..
H
"-'/.
. . . . . . . . . . , .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
...rr....~..
.~ :
H i
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........... .
. .
. .
. .
. .
. .
........ .
g
..
u
u
~
u
. .
u.
. 0
""
.
~
..
.
.. .
u.
~ ... =:
:I. ....
%:A.t.:I:
........ .
~
..
I
~
..
:::
"
.
. Ii
..
~ I Ii
. ...
u
. ..
~ n H
.. ~
u H
,
ATTACHMENT III
KINtJTES
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
Meeting of September 4, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. Chairman Wheeland and
Members Palmer, McFarlin, Platt, and Berlanga were present.
Member Castro and Member Roberts were absent (excused).
Item 3 was taken out of order.
ITEM 3:
Special Joint Meetinq of
Committee. Librarv Board of
Recreation commission reqardinq
Fourth St. and Oranqe Ave.
the Montqomerv Planninq
Trustees. and Parks &
the librarv/park site at
Rosemary Lane, Director of Libraries, gave the presentation. She
gave a brief history of the library site at Fourth St. and Orange
Ave. The site was selected for a library by the city Council in
August, 1990. At that time, a library and community
center/gymnasium were proposed for the site. In the process of
application for State Bond money, modifications were required which
removed the community center/gymnasium from the plans. Such uses
were not considered "library" uses, and thus would not qualify for
state funding and would make the project less competitive with
other applications for library grants from throughout California.
It was thought that the community center/gymnasium could be built
on the portion of the site designated for future expansion, but
terms of the state library grants required that the site must be
used for 1 ibrary purposes for fifty years. Al ternative # 1
represents the current application for state bond money, and
designates the entire site except for the area under the San Diego
Gas & Electric transmission lines for library or future library
purposes and parking.
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation, continued the
presentation. He presented Alternative #2, the staff
recommendation. This alternative includes the library, along with
an open air ampitheatre, passive park uses, and parking areas.
This alternative is recommended because it will still fall under
the definition of "library" uses which will a 110'" the City to
receive the state grant, and it will also provide some park uses
(in short supply within the Montgomery corr~unity) to area
residents.
<
Alternative #3, which includes a gymnasium/community center, is not
recorr~ended at this time because it would require re-application to
the state for the library grant, which could jeopardize the entire
proj ect. However, there is a big need for a gymnasium/community
center facility within the Montgomery community. If the facility
is not located at Fourth St. and Orange Ave., then other parks rrust
be cons idered, i ncl uding Lorna Verde, Otay, and the future Otay
Valley Regional Park.
'.
In response to a question, Director Lane affirmed that Alternative
# 2 requires no resubmittal to the state -- however, it does
require additional council expenditure authorization for the park
improvements. She noted. that the proposed ampi theatre will be
looked upon by the state as a big additional plus for the project.
Member McFarlin noted that she is very happy about the ampitheatre
proposal since it will provide a place for artists to perform.
Montgomery certainly needs more park facilities, but the library
and its facilities are a great opportunity for this particular site
which should not be passed up.
Chairman Wheeland expressed a strong desire for the project.to go
forward -- she is very worried about potential delays and the
resultant impact upon the state funding source.
Library Trustee Alexander supports Alternative # 2. While there is
still concern about the proximity of the San Diego Gas & Electric
transmission lines, Alternative # 2 does not place any of the majo~
facilities under them. .
General discussion about the impacts of Electro-Magnetic Fields
(EMF) occurred.
Member Hall of the Parks & Recreation Commission expressed regret
that a gymnasium could not be placed on this site, and although he
supports Alternative '2 as the best. possible plan under the
circumstances, he warned that no alternative gymnasium site within
the Montgomery community is on the horizon.
Member Palmer indicated that the Montgomery Planning Committee
since its inception has supported a library on this site -- a
gYIT,nasium can be placed at another location within the community.
MCTION: (Platt) Approve the original application (Alternative # 1)
and get the contract with the state for the grant money signed and
move the project forward with all deliberate speed.
MOTION PASSES: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Parks and Recreation Commission continued its discussion of the
issue.
MOTION: (Lind) Support with Alternative # 1 as shown in the grant
application, but move forward with Alternative # 2 and support it
at a later date during the project's desi9n phase.
Member Sandoval-Fernandez indicated that she thinks it is
imperative to strongly support Alternative # 2 in order to provide
for some park facilities on the site. She expressed concern about
the lukewarm support for Alternative # 2 implicit in the motion"
and believes that if Alternative # 2 is not strongly supported at
this time, it may not come to fruition.
,
,
In response to a question as to the actual staff recommendation,
Director Lane explained that the staff recommends that the existing
application for state grant money (Alternative #1) be retained at
this time. After the grant is awarded, during the detailed design
phase, staff will direct that the Alternative ~ 2 plan be planned,
and resubmitted to the state as a "minor refinement." Director
Lane believes that the state will enthusiastically accept the
design changes in Alternative #2, since they clearly make for a
superior project. Also, the City Council will need to authorize
additional local money be spent for the park improvements on the
site.
Member Lind restated his motion as follows:
concept plan (Alternative ~ 1), but keep
Alternative ~ 2 as the ultimate development
Accept the original
looking forward to
plan for the site.
Motion passed: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Library Board continued its discussion of the issue.
MOTION: (Donovan) Approve the original application (Alternative.
1) and move forward with the original contract. Once the contract
is signed, move forward with the Alternative ~ 2 plan at the
detailed design stage.
Motion passed: Four in favor, none opposed, one absent
The Montgomery Planning Committee now moved forward with the rest
of its agenda. There were no oral communications (Item # 1) and no
minutes to be approved (Item. 2).
ITEM 4:
Report from the Department of Enqineerinq on traffic
issues within the Montqomerv Community
There was no one present from the Engineering Department regarding
the report submitted to the Montgomery Planning Committee.
Chairman Wheeland stated that the written communication provided
did not answer the co~~ittee's concerns. She strongly requested
that Hal Rosenberg of the Engineering Dept. attend the next meeting
to personally interact with the Montgomery Planning Committee on
these issues.
Member McFarlin agreed with the Chairman I s assessment of the
Engineering Dept. response.
,
General discussion ensued on the issue of truck parking adjacent to
the car auction business on Main Street and the need for further
addressment of this issue.
Member Berlanga asked for addressment of the dangerous
intersections on Main Street, mainly the Main St.-Industrial Blvd.
intersection and the problem with the dangerous railroad bridge
adjacent.
,
MOTION: (Wheeland) Request attendance of Hal Rosenberg at the next
Montgomery Planning Committee meeting to personally discuss problem
traffic areas within the community in detail.
Motion passed: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Chair reported that no additional SR-125 meetings had occurred.
There were no committee reports.
Gordon Howard (staff) reported on a meeting with the Fenton Company
regarding a proposed residential development at the south end of
Rios Avenue within the San Diego City limits, and indicated that
the property owner offered to make a presentation on the proposed
project to the Montgomery Planning Committee once it is officially
submitted. Members expressed concern about the i~pacts of this
potential project on the otay River Valley Regional Park plan, and
requested that the project also be reviewed by the otay River Park
Citizen's Advisory Committee.
Staff was requested to add to the next agenda an item regarding the
need to ensure park uses at the site at the intersection of Fourth
Avenue (Hermosa Avenue) and Main Street and the sending of a letter
to the Parks & Recreation Commission to that effect.
The issue of the merger of the Montgomery Planning Committee with
the Southwest Redevelopment Project Advisory Committee is still
being reviewed by the City Attorney.
At 8:00, the meeting was adjourned.
Submitted by Gordon Howard
r
- .
,
ATTACHMENT III
MINUTES
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
Meeting of September 4, 1991
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. Chairman Wheeland and
Members Palmer, MCFarlin, Platt, and Berlanga were present.
Member Castro and Member Roberts were absent (excused).
Item 3 was taken out of order.
ITEM 3:
Special Joint Meetinq of
Committee. Librarv Board of
Recreation Commission reqardinq
Fourth St. and Oranqe Ave.
the Montqomerv Planninq
Trustees. and Parks &
the librarv/park site at
Rosemary Lane, Director of Libraries, gave the presentation. She
gave a brief history of the library site at Fourth St. and Orange
Ave. The site was selected for a library by the City Council in
August, 1990. At that time, a library and community
center/gymnasium were proposed for the site. In the process of
application for State Bond money, modifications were required which
removed the community center/gymnasium from the plans. Such uses
were not considered "library" uses, and thus would not qualify for
state funding and would make the project less competitive with
other applications for library grants from throughout California.
It was thought that the community center/gymnasium could be built
on the portion of the site designated for future expansion, but
terms of the state library grants required that the site must be
used for library purposes for fifty years. Al ternative # 1
represents the current application for state bond money, and
designates the entire site except for the area under the San Diego
Gas & Electric transmission lines for library or future library
purposes and parking.
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation, continued the
presentation. He presented Alternative #2, the staff
recommendation. This alternative includes the library, along with
an open air ampitheatre, passive park uses, and parking areas.
This alternative is recommended because it will still fall under
the de f ini tion of "1 ibrary" uses which will a 110'-- the City to
receive the state grant, and it will also provide some park uses
(in short supply within the Montgomery community) to area
residents.
<
Alternative #3, which includes a gymnasium/community center, is not
recoIT~ended at this time because it would require re-application to
the state for the library grant, which could jeopardize the entire
proj ect. However, there is a big need for a gymnasium/community
center facility within the Montgomery community. If the facility
is not located at Fourth St. and Orange Ave., then other parks must
be considered, including Lorna Verde, Otay, and the future Otay
Valley Regional Park.
'.
In response to a question, Director Lane affirmed that Alternative
II 2 requires no resubmittal to the state -- however, it does
require additional council expenditure authorization for the park
improvements. She noted that the proposed ampi theatre will be
looked upon by the state as a big additional plus for the project.
Member McFarlin noted that she is very happy about the ampitheatre
proposal since it will provide a place for artists to perform.
Montgomery certainly needs more park facilities, but the library
and its facilities are a great opportunity for this particular site
which should not be passed up.
Chairman Wheeland expressed a strong desire for the project "to go
forward -- she is very worried about potential delays and the
resultant impact upon the state funding source.
Library Trustee Alexander supports Alternative' 2. While there is
still concern about the proximity of the San Diego Gas & Electric
transmission lines, Alternative II 2 does not place any of the major
facilities under them. .
General discussion about the impacts of Electro-Magnetic Fields
(EMF) occurred.
Member Hall of the Parks & Recreation Commission expressed regret
that a gymnasium could not be placed on this site, and although he
supports Alternative '2 as the best _ possible plan under the
circumstances, he warned that no alternative gymnasium site within
the Montgomery community is on the horizon.
Member Palmer indicated that the Montgomery Planning Committee
since its inception has supported a library on this site -- a
gyrr.nasium can be placed at another location within the community.
MCTION: (Platt) Approve the original application (Alternative II 1)
and get the contract with the state for the grant money signed and
move the project forward with all deliberate speed.
MOTION PASSES: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Parks and Recreation Commission continued its discussion of the
issue.
MOTION: (Lind) Support with Alternative << 1 as shown in the grant
application, but move forward with Alternative II 2 and support it
at a later date during the project's desi9n phase.
Member Sandoval-Fernandez indicated that she thinks it is
imperative to strongly support Alternative II 2 in order to provide
for some park facilities on the site. She expressed concern about
the lukewarm support for Alternative II 2 implicit in the motion,
and believes that if Alternative 1/ 2 is not strongly supported at
this time, it may not come to fruition.
,
,
In response to a question as to the actual staff recommendation,
Director Lane explained that the staff recommends that the existing
application for state grant money (Alternative #1) be retained at
this time. After the grant is awarded, during the detailed design
phase, staff will direct that the Alternative. 2 plan be planned,
and resubmitted to the state as a "minor refinement." Director
Lane believes that the state will enthusiastically accept the
design changes in Alternative .2, since they clearly make for a
superior project. Also, the city Council will need to authorize
additional local money be spent for the park improvements on the
site.
Member Lind restated his motion as follows: Accept the original
concept plan (Alternative . 1), but keep looking forward to
Alternative. 2 as the ultimate development plan for the site.
Motion passed: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Library Board continued its discussion of the issue.
MOTION: (Donovan) Approve the original application (Alternative t
1) and move forward with the original contract. Once the contract
is signed, move forward with the Alternative . 2 plan at the
detailed design stage.
Motion passed: Four in favor, none opposed, one absent
The Montgomery Planning Committee now moved forward with the rest
of its agenda. There were no oral communications (Item. 1) and no
minutes to be approved (Item. 2).
ITEM 4:
Report from the Department of Enoineerino on traffic
issues within the Montoomerv Community
There was no one present from the Engineering Department regarding
the report submitted to the Montgomery Planning Committee.
Chairman Wheeland stated that the written communication provided
did not answer the committee's concerns. She strongly requested
that Hal Rosenberg of the Engineering Dept. attend the next meeting
to personally interact with the Montgomery Planning Committee on
these issues.
Member McFarlin agreed with the Chairman's assessment of the
Engineering Dept. response.
(
General discussion ensued on the issue of truck parking adjacent to
the car auction business on Main Street and the need for further
addressment of this issue.
Member Berlanga asked for addressment of the dangerous
intersections on Main Street, mainly the Main St.-Industrial Elvd.
intersection and the problem with the dangerous railroad bridge
adjacent.
,
MOTION: (Wheeland) Request attendance of Hal Rosenberg at the next
Montgomery Planning Committee meeting to personally discuss problem
traffic areas within the community in detail.
Motion passed: Five in favor, none opposed, two absent
The Chair reported that no additional SR-125 meetings had occurred.
There were no committee reports.
Gordon Howard (staff) reported on a meeting with the Fenton Company
regarding a proposed residential development at the south end of
Rios Avenue within the San Diego City limits, and indicated that
the property owner offered to make a presentation on the proposed
project to the Montgomery Planning Committee once it is officially
submitted. Members expressed concern about the i~pacts of this
potential project on the otay River Valley Regional Park plan, and
requested that the project also be reviewed by the otay River Park
Citizen's Advisory Committee.
Staff was requested to add to the next agenda an item regarding the
need to ensure park uses at the site at the intersection of Fourth
Avenue (Hermosa Avenue) and Main Street and the sending of a letter
to the Parks & Recreation commission to that effect.
The issue of the merger of the Montgomery Planning Committee with
the Southwest Redevelopment Project Advisory Committee is still
being reviewed by the City Attorney.
At 8:00, the meeting was adjourned.
Submitted by Gordon Howard
,*
COUNCll.. AGENDA STAlEMENT
Item 8'
Meeting Date ~
ITEM 1TI1...E:
Resolution ~~ZAgreement Between the City of Chula Vista, Ralph
Andersen & Associates and Baldwin Vista Associates, L.P.
VIA:
General Manager, Otay V Project
Deputy City Manager t
SUBMll"LED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
"/t-/(..
City Manager ~" )
(4/5th Vote: Yes_NoX)
The City of Chula Vista is the agency designated to approve consulting contracts for the
Otay Ranch Project. Ralph Andersen & Associates has been selected by the Otay Ranch
Executive Committee to complete the Service/Revenue Micro-Analysis. That report will
determine fiscal impacts associated with the project when considering capital expenditures
as well as operations and maintenance costs.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve the Agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates including the attached scope-of-
work and authorize the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement.
BOARDS\COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Contracts for consulting work on the Otay Ranch Project are processed through the City of
Chula Vista. Attached is the scope-of-work for Ralph Andersen & Associates. This has been
agreed to by the consultants, applicant, City of Chula Vista and San Diego County Chief
Administrator's Office. In July of 1990, the City of Chula Vista approved a contract with
Hughes, Heiss & Associates to prepare both the macro- and micro-analysis of the Service/
Revenue Plan. The macro-analysis defined and compared the estimated service cost and
revenue characteristics of three alternative development scenarios to provide input to policy
makers as decisions related to development density were made. The purpose of the micro-
analysis is to refine that data and direct it to one preferred alternative which would be
considered by the Interjurisdictional Task Force and then by both the City of Chula Vista
and the County of San Diego. The objective of the micro-analysis will be to clearly identify
capital and service costs associated with that development scenario and to evaluate
alternatives for financing all capital and operating costs now covered by normal revenue
streams.
~-\
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date ~
~
Because it was determined that a fully integrated computer model was required for the
micro-analysis, and Hughes, Heiss & Associates did not have that capability, it was necessary
to retain the services of a new consultant. The Otay Ranch Executive Staff Committee,
through the Service/Revenue Technical Committee, had completed a search for prospective
consultants, conducted interviews and recommended the retention of Ralph Andersen &
Associates. The City of Chula Vista procedures for selection of a consultant was followed
by the Otay Ranch Executive Staff Committee.
Attached is a detailed Scope-of-Work and Work Plan for the micro-analysis. Basically, this
Scope-of-Work and Work Plan defines all of the analysis and report writing necessary to
complete the micro-analysis and divides the effort into two parts: The preparation of the
fiscal analysis, which will involve coordination with all the Governmental agencies serving
the project to determine the capital requirements and the operation and maintenance costs
associated with the project. And, secondly, the preparation of the Finance Plan, which will
detail the alternative financing programs involved with the implementation of the project.
This work effort will focus on one alternative since the macro-analysis has looked at the
wide range of alternatives associated with the project.
FISCAL IMP ACf:
There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Chula Vista because the Baldwin Company will
be funding the above-stated scope-of-work. The total obligation of the terms of the contract
is $143,000.00.
Attachment #of'SCAIoJ1<JE()
LL \RA&AAl13
~..2.
RESOLUTION NO. 11.,35t..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, RALPH ANDERSEN &
ASSOCIATES AND BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES, L.P.,
FOR SERVICE/REVENUE PLAN ON THE OTAY RANCH AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the
designated to approve
project; and
Ci ty of
consulting
Chula Vista
contracts for
is
the
the agency
Otay Ranch
WHEREAS, Ralph Andersen & Associates has been selected
by the Otay Ranch Execu ti ve Commi t tee to complete the Service/
Revenue Micro-Analysis which will determine fiscal impacts
associated with the project when considering capital expenditures
as well as operations and maintenance costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Agreement between
the City of Chula vista, Ralph Andersen & Associates and Baldwin
Vista Associates, L.P., for Service/Revenue Plan on the Otay
Ranch, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the Ci ty of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
~ tl~l~
D. Richard Rudolf, Asslstant
City Attorney
93lBa
~-~ I g-4f
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES
AND BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES, L.P.
FOR
SERVICE/REVENUE PLAN ON THE OTAY RANCH
This Agreement is made this day of , 1991, for the purposes of
reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the parties, between the
City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal corporation of the State of California, and
Ralph Andersen & Associates, independent contractor ("Consultant") and Baldwin Vista
Associates, L.P. ("Applicant"), and is made with reference to the following facts:
RE~IIALS
Whereas, the City of Chula Vista is interested in a Service/Revenue Plan to
assist in the planning of the Otay Ranch; and,
Whereas, Ralph Andersen & Associates has extensive experience with fiscal
analyses such as this as well as understanding public agency needs; and,
Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and
staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of
Consultant to City in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties
a. General Duties/Scope-of-Work
Consultant shall provide service/revenue technical assistance and coordination
as described in attached Exhibit "A". Major headings of which are listed as follows (defined
services):
Documentation of Study Assumptions
Draft and Final Methodology Report Table
FIND Model
Documentation of Model Test Run
Documentation of Preferred Land Use Alternative
Draft and Final Report, Fiscal Impacts of Preferred Land Use Alternative
Financing Plan
- 1 -
~..S
b. Standard of Care
Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined
Services or Additional Services, shall be performed in a manner consistent with that level
of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing
under similar conditions and in similar locations.
c. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by
it are protected by worker's compensation insurance and the Consultant has the coverage
under public liability and property damage insurance policies which this Agreement requires
to be demonstrated in the form of a certificate of insurance.
Consultant will provide, prior to the commencement of the services required
under this agreement the following certificates of insurance to the City prior to beginning
work:
Statutory Worker's Compensation coverage plus $1,000,000 Employers liability
coverage.
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000 combined single
limit which names City as an additional insured, and which is primary to any policy which
the City may otherwise carry ("primary coverage"), and which treats the employees of the
City in the same manner as members of the general public ("cross-liability coverage").
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a Best's Rating of "A, Class
V", or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City's Risk Manager.
All policies shall provide that same may not be canceled without at least thirty
(30) days written notice to the City.
2. Duties of the City
a. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the
progress of the Service/Revenue Plan and to provide direction and guidance to accomplish
the analysis and shall make available for Consultant's use all material associated with the
Service/Revenue Macro-analysis.
- 2 -
~-b
b. Compensation
The compensation to be paid by City to Consultant for all of the work and
direct expenses required herein shall be a fee of $143,000.00 ("Fee") payable in progress
payments in an amount that the City Manager, or his designee, shall determine corresponds
to the value provided to the City to the date of billing. Consultant will bill the City monthly
with payment due within 30 days. It is agreed by all parties that Consultant will not proceed
with project if sufficient monies are not deposited on the first of each month according to
the deposit schedule contained herein. Included in this amount is the cost of Bartle Wells
portion of the work plan. Consultant shall be responsible for the payment of Bartle Wells.
Also, included in the above is reimbursement of expenses for such direct costs as travel,
printing and binding, postage and delivery, clerical and long distance telephone charges.
Consultant agrees to perform all of the services, provide the analysis and deliver the Work
Product herein required, and in the manner of the detailed Scope-of- Work set forth on the
attached Exhibit "A" including rates for professional services and schedule, except for
optional items listed in Exhibit "A" which are not included. Applicant agrees to deposit
monies based on that schedule as follows:
Month 1 $ 9,038
2 43,120
3 32,950
4 14,080
5 18,960
6 24.010
Total $142,158
Included in the above for month #1 is compensated for work program
preparation time in the amount of $9,038.02. This is not included in, but is in addition to,
Exhibit "A".
c. Reductions in Scope-of-Work
City may, from time to time, reduce the Scope-of-Work by the Consultant to
be performed under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and
confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the Fee associated with
said reduction.
d. Additional Scope-of-Work
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may
require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the General Duties
and Scope-of-Work ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, Consultant shall
perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth on Exhibit "A". All
- 3 -
<i'-1
compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed when an addendum
to this contract is approved.
3. Administration of Contract
The City hereby designates the General Manager of the Otay Ranch, or his written
designee, as its representative for the review and administration of the work performed by
Consultant herein required.
4. Term
Consultant shall perform all of the Defined Services herein required of it by not later
than June 30, 1992, and shall abide by and comply with any interim time frames and
milestone dates that are or may be set forth in Exhibit "A".
5. Financial Interests of Consultant
Consultant warrants and represents that neither he, nor his immediate family
members, nor his employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest,
directly or indirectly, whatsoever in the property which is the subject matter of the Project,
or in any property within 10 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of the property which
is the subject matter of the Project, or ("Prohibited Interest") except as listed on an
attachment.
Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment,
remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant
or Consultant Associates. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may
be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that neither Consultant nor his immediate family members, nor his
employees or agents, shall acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this
Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement.
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement,
or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this
Agreement.
6. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected and
appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and
expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the
Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the
execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from
.4-
~..i'
the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or employees.
Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and
liability incurred by the City, its officers agents, or employees in defending against such
claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not.
7. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
his/her obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the
effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In
that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become
the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials
up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts on deposit
from Applicant, and from no other asset or resource of the City, a special obligation which
is not a burden upon, or appropriation from, the General Fund of the City.
8. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the General Manager determines that the Consultants' negligence,
errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in
expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors,
omissions in the plans or contract specifications, Consultant shall reimburse City for the
additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights
under other provisions of this agreement. This determination may be appealed to the Otay
Ranch Executive Staff Committee.
9. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason for giving specific
written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof,
at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the
option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property except the FIND Model which
is copyright-protected by Ralph Andersen & Associates. If the Agreement is terminated by
City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials
to the effective date of such termination not to exceed the amounts on deposit from
Applicant, and from no other asset or resource of the City, a special obligation which is not
a burden upon, or appropriation from, the General Fund of the City.
- 5.
~ -'t
10. Assignability
The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign
any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by
assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City which City may not
unreasonable deny.
11. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the
sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or
in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by
Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent
of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose as may be limited by the
provisions of the Public Records Act, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in
whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or
properties produced under this Agreement. It is understood that the FIND model is
copyright-protected by Ralph Andersen & Associates, and that it is excluded from the above
statement.
12. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an
independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the
services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept
Consultant's work products). Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or
representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and
shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any
benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime,
retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits.
13. Responsible Charge
Consultant hereby designates that Clayton E. Brown shall be Consultant's
representative ("Project Manager") to the project for the duration of the project. No
substitution for this position shall be allowed without written approval from the City.
14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City
unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and
acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be
- 6 -
~ ..to
amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth
herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for
the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
15. Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs
and attorney's fees.
- 7 -
8 -/1
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AGREEMENT WITH
RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES
SERVICE/REVENUE PLAN ON THE OTAY RANCH
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement
this _ day of , 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES
BY:
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
BY:
Clayton E. Brown
President/CEO
ATTEST:
BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES, L.P.
BY:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
BY:
Gregory T. Smith
President
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY: II
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Attachment
LL:\RA&ACON
- 8 -
"8 - 1'2..
(~
EXHIBIT "A"
alp" Ar'c~-se"
& ASSOCI2:eS
August 6, 1991
TO: Tony Lettieri, AlCP, Otay Ranch Planning Group
FROM: Clay Brown
Ralph Andersen & Associates
SUBJECf: Otay Ranch Fiscal Impact Micro-Analysis
The purpose of this memo is to respond to your request for the following
information.
. A revised Project timeline,
· Hourly rate information for Ralph Andersen & Associates' and Bartle Wells'
staffs, and '
. A statement of assumptions relied upon by Ralph Andersen & Associates in
the development of the workplan and supporting cost data dated July 26,
1991.
The revised timeline and the requested hourly rate information are enclosed. The
assumptions upon which Ralph Andersen & Associates has prepared the workplan
and the supporting cost data follows.
ASSUMPTIONS
. The Service Revenue Committee will be Ralph Andersen & Associates , client
and as such, the Committee will acknowledge agreement at major milestones
throughout the assignment
~-13
Sacramento
o a 1 I a s
Newport
B e a c r
1446 Ethan Way, SUite 101, Sacramento, CA 95825 '" (916) 929 5575 ,.. (916) 9292075
Tony Lettieri
Otay R/lnch Planning Group
Page 2
· Ralph Andersen & Associates are the project consultants and as such will be
responsible for coordinating the work of Bartle Wells
. The Service Revenue Committee has greatly reduced the level of artalysis from
the July 15, 1991, edition of the scope of work to the July 26, 1991, edition
of the scope of work This has resulted in a commensurate reduction in the
project cost. Analysis beyond that detailed in the scope of work will be
accomplished only in accordance with the contract language.
. The data upon which Ralph Andersen & Associates will develop the F1ND
model is City and County 1991-92 fiscal year data. The City and the County
will facilitate the scheduling for the data collection interviews. They will
discuss a list of interviewees with the consultants, notify the appropriate City
and County staff of the consultant's need for interviews, and, if necessary,
directly schedule the interviews. City and County staff identified by the
Committee will provide the consultants with estimates of maintenance and
operating costs for all new facilities and equipment included in the Project.
This infonnation will be provided to the consultants on a timely basis.
. The timeline for the project indicates it will take approximately five months
(September 1991, through January 1992) to conduct the project. If
completion of the project is delayed beyond June 1992, the consultant shall
be entitled to an increase in hourly rates commensurate with its then current
hourly rates for the remainder of the project
WORK PRODUcrS
· The Otay Ranch Project Micro-Analysis work products to be developed by
Ralph Andersen &Associates with the support of Bartle WelLr are listed below.
Work products prepared by the consultant will be in the fonn of memoranda
and reports. As used in the workplan, the tenn memorandum means a written
summary in modified outline fonnat. As used in the workplan, the tenn report
means a bound written document in standard prose fonnat.
<<..,~
Tony Lettieri
Otay &znch Planning Group
Page 3
- Documentation of Study Assumptions (Item B.1.a)
A memorandum report summarizing all major study assumptions
established through initial meetings with the Service Revenue
Technical Committee Will be written. Refer to study outline, items
B.1.a.l through B.1.a.13, for specific assumptions that will be docu-
mented.
Draft and Froal Methodology Report Table (Item B.1.c)
Prior to developing the FIND Model, this document will summarize
all key assumptions used in developing the Model including by
cost/revenue line item, the following:
.. Fixed versus variable costs/revenues
.. Proposed distribution method
.. Workload and related statistics needed to distribute costs/
revenues.
This document will first be prepared as a draft for review with the
Service Revenue Technical Committee prior to follow-up interviews
with operating department staff. As a result of these reviews, a
Final Methodology Report Table will be developed. This document
will also identify variations between the proposed methodology and
the methodology applied in the macro-analysis.
FIND Model (Item B.1.d)
Consistent with the format for the FIND Model and the
Methodology Report Table, the FIND Model will be developed for
the Otay Ranch Project. Supporting the computer Model, a FIND
Users Guide will be prepared to support the ongoing use and
maintenance of FIND.
- Documentation of Model Test Run (Optional, Item B.1.e)
A memorandum report will be prepared that presents the inputs and
outputs from a sample scenario (assuming that the preferred land
use plan is not finalized). In preparing the math check/logic check,
this report will:
.. Summarize land use assumptions for the sample scenario
~.IS
Tony Lettieri
Otay Ranch Planning Group
Page 4
.. Document the specific cost/revenue allocation factors by
program/revenue source and by land use type
.. Present the resulting computations of costs/revenues
.. Include copies of the resulting reports and graphs generated
through the test. .
Documentation of Preferred Land Use Alternative (Item B.2.a)
Prior to analyzing the fiscal impacts associated with the preferred
land use alternative, a memorandum report will be prepared to
outline all applicable assumptions pertaining to the preferred
alternative. This summary will be reviewed and confirmed with the
Service Revenue Technical Committee prior to running any analysis
of the alternative.
Draft and Final Report, Fiscal Impacts of Preferred Land Use
Alternative (Items B.3, B.4 and B.5)
The Draft Final Report and Final Report will summarize the
resulting impacts of the preferred land use alternative as generated
using the FIND Model. Among other things, the report will include
the following:
.. Study goals and objectives
.. Approach and methodology
.. Assumptions
.. Cost analysis (city, county, special districts)
.. Revenue analysis (city, county, special districts)
.. Net fiscal impact
The draft final and, as appropriate, the final report will incorporate
a limited number of alternative scenarios for review and analysis.
Financing Plan (Item D.3)
This component of the analysis will be prepared and submitted as
a technical report and will include Items D.3.a through D.3.f in the .
noted scope of work. .
A total of 1 0 copies of each memorandum and report will be provided to the
Services Revenue Technical Committee. In addition. the consultant will
~ -/l"
Tony Lettieri
Dtay Rmzch Planning Group
Page 5
provide the Committee with one unbound copy of each report, suitable for
copying.
. A total of nine meetings with the Service Revenue Technical Committee, one
with the Executive Committee and one optional meeting related to task B.l-e.
are included in the workplan. Each of these meetings will be scheduled in
advance and planned so that the consulJant's reviews/presentations and can
be accomplished during a single meeting. Additional meetings will be attended
by the consultants on a time and materials basis.
. At the conclusion of the project, the consultants will provide the Service
Revenue Technical Committee with a FIND model that is computer assisted.
The software upon which the model will be developed is Paradox.
Please feel free to call Jim or me if you have any questions or if you need any
additional information.
~-'l
Tony Lettieri
Dtay Raoch Planning Group
Page 6
RALPH ANDERSEN & ASSOCIATES
Professional service costs for projects accepted by the firm are most often quoted
as a fixed amount. The professional-time rates upon which these project costs are
developed are listed below.
. President/CEO
. Senior Vice President
. Principal Consultant
. Senior Consultant
. Consultant
$150
125
100
85
75
The only other cost for which the client is responsible would be for the
reimbursement of actual out-of-pocket expenses for such items as travel, printing,
postage and delivery, support staff and long distance telephone charges. The hourly-
time rates for support staff is listed below.
. Vice President-Administration
. All Other Support Staff
$75
30
~../i'
BARTLE WELLS
BILLING RATE SCHEDULE 90-9
ProfessioDal SeIvices
Fees for ~fessional services are based on hourly rates for professional level per.
sonnel as follows:
Staff' ConsultaIlt . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . S 7S/hr.
Cons11ltant . , . I . . . . . . . . . . . . . I . . . . . . . . I . , . . . . . . . . . . . I 95/hr.
Senior Consultant. . . . . . . . . . . . '.' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1101br.
Princlp~ConnUumt .0... '...0 ..,......... '0' ,.,. ...... 12SIbr.
Limited or Spec:ja} ^ceil5".....,,~ A minimwn fee of $1,200 plus direct expenses
will be billed for any consulting assignment.
The professional-time rates include:
1. AIl consultant, administrative, and secretarial salaries
2. Microcomputer systems and standard software
3. All overhead and indirect costs including:
- pro.!=' Lt, payroll, and income taxes _ rent
- routine postage _ local telephone
- accounting ana legal services _ social security
· com])Tehensive general liability insurance _ workers' compensation
· memberships ani:! subscriptions _ lU1employmem insurance
- health and disability insurance _ sick leave and vacation
Direct ~
Teclu1ica1 typing, word ~ and ~ter-asslsted seJ'Vices related to l~L
and official .statement j)roduction, including all costs associated with owned or
leased equi~ment, is charged as a direct ~e at $4S/hr. Other expenses di.
rectly identifiable to the project including- (Out not 1imited to) those listed below
are Charged at cost plus 10 percent.
- n-ave1, ttansportation, subsistence _ photo~J'hr
· communications (telcp.hone and fax) _ graphic destgn
- delivery and ~ charges _ borid ratings
· photocoJ)ying and Dinding _ advertisements
- statisrlc81 services _ outside computer services
- typography and printing _ legal services
Insurance
We maintain, at our own cost and ~ense, the following policies of insurance
with carners doing business In California:
- comprehensive general liability insurance
· workers' com])eJ1Sation cawrage on non-officers as required by California law
- professional liability insurance
All costs mC'\UTed in complying with special insurance, Jicensin2, or permit reo
quirements, Includ,ing but not 1imited to nA1ftin( client as an aaditioilal insured
and a waiver of subrogation, become the responsibility of the client and are not
included in the fees tor services or direct expenses, but are billed in addition
to the contract at cost plus 20 percent. .
P~yment
B4lings for professional services and direct ~enses are submitted monthly.
A late charge of 1 percent per month is applied to balances unpald after 30 days.
t-l~
:1
.. "
.e .g
.!~ - T
~
:~ &, -
:> ~
" <( ~
u
<(
I
:s f ~
~ .! ~
'0 ~
Q
~"
C
oS
i ~
=
~
~
~
I>::
~
~t;
<101 '"
ot;-
Q~I>::<~'"
1010"""":;18:
ii!J:t:=~Z-
> u-<"
[;J1;~:;1o~
i::~~~~
0:;;:"'-
u... ~
"'0
.J:
!:
:: l
-
><
(oj
"
" ..
C.!i
~..!
~ ~
~<
~~
C
oS
'0
Q
~
~
j
..
,.,3
-
~
i;!
."
Ii
-
-
~
-
Z
~
Q
o
~
-
,!!3
~
i
tJ
..
a
~ '
" ~
'~ -
" Ii
~ a
...;
..:
~
~
'"
11
=
8
~"
'~
;;; ~
~'6'0
'" ,0
_ 0-
~ ~.g
~:;! ~-:5
~ "
,,~
'~ "
"'~ ~ ~
... "
&: ,,~
fd ~ td
I = -= ~
""u
.
~
~
V')
M
"
"
t.::
"
~
."
:a
B
..
;;
Q
"
~
'8
~
G
'a
..c
...
~E
u Vi
:> "
B'~
> c.
~ ~
8 ~
,~: ~
u.~ u
~ a ~
,;; ..c "
:s ,'" >
_~ 0
H co: 0
~ ~ ....;
~,~
~
't;
:>
.::
~
=3,-
'''' <.> ,-
:s " "
.... ~.=-
.. ..c
-= ~ ~
....'_ 0
c:I C,J.-
U ~ <<S
a--
co 3 ~
~ o.~
~ c.r u
bQ~:
...."."
o :; c
.!3 ..
'a't; -
" "
='~..c
0-
" _ 0
-:5 c. -
.,g 0
~- -"
-= U'~
u E:"= .
~ u.~ ~
~." ..
.
."
;
~
-
..
."
~
~
J
~
;;;
3
-
:f .!1
" -
." ..
'~ ."
o "
- :>
c.,B
,~ 8
t; '~
~ ~
M
I
-
.::?
~
0;
::
,c
~
1i
",,,,,
~ ..,
.::~
-
cO;
:: '"
t1 .S
c -
~8'
5:&21
-
-
"
..c .",
- ,,--
.... '" co
0= CQ' C':J
VoI"i ..c .e
.~ B..e..
C'Q:-"'-
"'O~ca~
CI -.... ::I
=_v...
2 ....4.~--
... coO e"!s
o """! Co. ~
.....CQuu
!!!~-:5-
0.!3 8
:= 'a B'~
a = '" u
t.::...,8~
,,':::'0;: ."
"'0 C t;, Go)
~ s ~.~
..QE.g"'Q
.s ~'~ co
Uj ..0 _ 8-
c.:>
.
1:~
c .~
~';:!
..~
0:;...
=='
;::;--N'-
'-- '--
...
~ c
0
:!:: ~.!j
- ..
E'Q
0
u
:5 I:
.!
~ -;
Q
~
~
o
~b
Zr.1 ~
<'"'be;;
Q~~;:~~
r.10"":!:<_
~~=-~'oC"
>r..~u..:i ,....
r.1 0 < 0...
c.: uc.::;
r.1 ~u'"'
~~G::i
u..
'10
<
..
==
-
-
><
r.1
"
'" ..
I:~
'" ..
...-
~ ~
-=~
...
-oCj
~
i
=
C
.!
-;
Q
~
~
C
.!
-;
Q
~
..
Q
"
o
.'"
~
'"
...
...
..
...
o
......
'"
Ii
"
o
.'"
..
]
~ .5
.....
,,~
o ...
"13 &
" "
";:r ~
~o
- "
8 .~
'"U-~
" "
.. .~
t~ v1
...... :;
:-:0"=
" -;;; 0
,,"'"
.- :.o'c
e .. ..
... ,,-
~.c V)
" "
QS8
-
..
8
......
"
"
"
"
>
"
c.:
.
M
""
.5
:g
o
-=
'"
Ii
"
.~ ~
~:E
6..~
52 to
-0
~e
.- "
......
~-;;
" ...
cr g
"
" ""
:g ..'
... ...0
" -
:J~
...
...
" .
..'"
"
...::
- "
.. 0"
... "
... ...
"
'"
"
"
"
~
11
o
e''''
~~
8 ~
... "
Ii 0
c.,
~"
"= a..>
" "
" to
::! ..
.
~~ 2.1
i:
"
o
u
~
..
Be
ez
.~ f::
" ...
g"~
...~
.. -a
C;"C
... -
" .~
:g:::
..
... 'u
:; !So
- ..
""">:
.. -
:~u
w~
vi
...
"
.. "
- -=
....-
.":::: 0
u-
"']
...-
~.-=
~b
5 ~
8-:5
-" ...
c
~ ..
...
B.~ ~
- ..."
c; o.~
....~o
Q-o.
.~ ij ~
~~.9
_,,0
.
...
, 0
...
" ...
- "
"..c
"'. ~ !a
~,,'::
P""O,s .....
..... = ... tj
" .. "::.-
cr - .~ :::
.. .....~
I) 4) L,,-Q
:g 8 0_
" """
'" !3 ~'u
j ~ ~ !So
_u,.::::c;r.I
~ e " ...
".=..... ~ 0
.- 0 ~
b ...5 .u-
"::::'~..c
" g'~ ~
1'3 0 "" c
5.9'a is
~ e "u
.
j;j
"
e
"
"
to
..
~
..
c '
03_
,g c.. c C'Q:
"u-=
~cu:;
] .g ':5 .~
~B='=
~ c.~~
.- " ~
ta"";l..... "";
:g .8 .8 'u
,,=.. !So
-:9'~.8 ;:,
. - E c
~ = u cr$
c.," ..
8 e... 1: ..
= I) C = u
8t1,g~:;
c.,";;;u"g
~ ~.~ ,,-
!' ..... "C.c u
U U 0 - t:
Q-S-::~~
.
..0
~
.::
-
"
"
."
~
~
"=",,,
" <:J
.5 Eo::
'Qra
t: 5
~ ',::
~8'
~
00
1: .1::
l~
'""'""
~~
g
='
~
Q b \
~[oj!-o~
OUtn
e~i:::;:a:
"'~=~~-.
~~~~6;
[ojj;j!",=''''
c.>_u~
o-<r.~
u!-o
'10
-<
!::
e:
-
><
[oj
'21
..
~
"
..
""
.. ..
}~
~
j
~
=
~
.! -
~
!
=
~
~
-
3
~
"
.. '"
~~
.. ..
...-
..:! ~
'"
-g,.<
~~
-
~
.!
"2i
Q
5-
Q
~
:.
u
;;
..
=
'"'
..~
0-
!!.1i
4 :(j
~ ~
.. ..
.....
u u
-<:t
.. ..
.. co.
~.!j
'ia 'C .
.E U'~
,,"'~
....-
~ t3 =
u i; &'IS
.s... .s
~~...
~-&,I:!
u .- .-
Q~~
.
,..:
'"
:.
!;!.
o
....
+
~
o
...
o .
.- .~
t !:;
co.-
..
... ~
~ u
",..c:
.51 ;
~.-
..c:'"
co.U
<:tog
u-
.~ "
8.5
;~
.~ 0
:0:
.. ..
- ..
~!;!.
--
::I
o
...
'3
..c:
ti
::s
..
~
.~
~
"
u
e
go
]
Q
.
00
~-)2.
'"
.5 " =
..... ~
~:-::::o~
:::1:=-
::I U"
..c:8 co.
"""~ 5 E
"C - U Q.,
" 0 ..
..::::- ..co.s >.
- .. ~
.... 'C c..lJ t)
~~~g~
_.51 "Q t"'I '-
u.......... .0;; 0
:(j a -g '" U
..c: 0 ..Jj ~
=..c: ;g'"
_...s].!!
~tE! go - B
&""0 ;......2.5
o = -.. >o-
w C'I:I '= bQ 0
Q.,tI.I50-
..~ ... "0 -=
.~ .. 'T"'8 r!
~ "'0 ~....c ...
~ -;;; ~ ..
_ c.; e ;
'"
J;1
~
0;;
t;
.~
~
~
.:;:.:c
'" ~
.5 r;;:;
"5-
t: ~
~ .Q
Q8-
~~rt:
:;;:;;:~:
'"
~
"
'"
.5
;;
..
g,
o
.~
.u
-'!
::: "
00=
u..;;::.1i
~ ~ 8 '"
~ ;:;; 15 ~
.. ~.." "
.5 .a.~ ~
........ = u
g.!! <( ~
'\i;:3 . ~
_ Cj ~ w
o~a~~
"'8.~ 8 8 j
-:: ~ O!", .!:! ($
u c ...-
So"'O~~
U 'Ci ~ 0"'8
.s _ ~ 0...
E 8 OJ.;.s:
~..........:; u e
u g u";j c:..
Q".~-e~
..:
......
"
..
:!
-;;;
..
3
......
:!!
"
"
e
"
..
"
"
-
.
g
1:: ~
Q .-
~ ~
..."
'>:~
:::-N"
~~
....
fo CI
" ~
.E i.!! e:,
- co
8'Q "
" <
U
'3 ~ ~
.!
~ '0 .,.,-
...
Q
~
:.d
'"
~
ct;
ZIoJ "-'
<<......-
OU"-'
c~"'<~;:
1oJ0=-=-<<""
~~5~~;
~~;~~~
~iii:,,-,u...
~~~~
us
~
...
-
!'!!
-
~
IoJ
CI
" ..
~.!j
" co
"CI]
~ .,
.g,~
-~
~
C
.!
'0
Q
l
==
~
~
~
.!
'0
Q
~
co
Q
:r
'"
"
-
.,
"
"
,~
:f
"
"
8
"
,!O oJ
,,-
"'"
" -
- .,
.. ~
~.~
"CI "
]:a
" -
''': OJ
,~ -=
"CI_
"CI :I
<.....
...;
....
.,
.~
~
"
.!O
"CI
"CI
"
..
..
~
"CI
-;a
CI
.g
'6
-0
'" ,
-0
~~
C'=
" '"
-0 "
- -
.
-
"
"
.9
~
"
'"
8
-
~
.,
"
.~
o
-g.
-:3 g
OJ ''':::
e ~
~'e
- -
" "
~o
_ -0
.
-
"
"
,9
"0
..!!
'8
"
.:;
-
~
1:-i-
:= 'S:
..:>':a
'~ '"
8.=
., "
" e
- ""
" "
,2Pu
~~
.
~..,t3
~
"
v
'E
"
.,
....
"
.,
]
..!!
-0
"
,!O
ri
-0
~.!8
'E :.
"'-0
] ~
.!!~
"'-0
..,-
,5~
]~
N
....
.::; 4)
" .:;
::: ell
0..> ':: c:
..:>!;! '6
.s~ .fi
o ~ .S"'ri
- " >
~~ t1"'~
,:..s! '-> '.,5 8
_ .....= ell
:'! 0;:' 'iO 'E
.c::s ti~ "'; ~
E..c -O'r!
u .:P..g u.s
V)..: os: ~ OJ
~"'''l;:~
.i1iS,.c':
-""';S>.=u
.;.0.. ~ ':: 0 u
:= :J Q' U ~
1: > ~ ~'y
0:':: "" .::7 u
~..a BiJ ~
.
-...!.
'" -
-= .5
..!i3 0
" -
>
~Q~
B g ~
'" '" '"
~j.!
= S! e
';;; :I ""
~~~
~ " ';
-=--
v 8
~1'E
" "
~ eo"
- " ..,
B o..>.!
:2;.=
.
~E
0::-
""-
~ oj
"
~ ~
".~
'S: 8
" 8
- "
-oU
~]
!!.~
,,g -5
"""
~...
~ g
- ~
.~4J
"'e::
8 8
S'E
~~
~~
..;
....
~
.,.,-
...
.,.,
:Q ;;
~~
" 8
0-0
-0 "
" '"
.:; .,
" "
8 is
.~ ~
~::
-;a....
~ 0
, 8
" "
1:1 ....
'" "
8 .8
,,-
,lj-5
~ ~
-0 -
~~
.!! ~
.E g
~ g
oJ
-a
~
-
<:I
::
.9
~
~
-='"
" ~
.S 0:;
'01;
:: ::
~ .0
~8-
5: r~~~!!:.
00
'C: .::
" ~
e-"
<:o;::!
::;-~
~~
j
~
Ct:
~
QG
~f:!i-!!i
:.::OU'"
i3~f~;~
~==o!~:-
~~~~o~
[oJi>!uCt::;
=->~U..,
o:<r:r.;:
Ui- oC
'10
<
i-
S; I
-
-
><
[oJ
"'I
"
CI)
=':
"
o
""
..!!,IJ
~~
8
s
~
~
.!!
=
Q
~
N
...
~
.!!
=
Q
l
=
~
~
~
N"
...
~ 8 ~
.!! ....
" = zi
" ., zi
r;,IJ Q
~.s
~ ~
.,
-a. <
~~ N
~
~
,-
-:3~ 7':!J
u-'~
a a Sa '"
"E" "
"'O.~ ~ ~
= u u 0
"ij.... b
a - '"
a ~ ~ a
S5J!a
u > =r- 0
..:: ~ .;>-...t::
0-=== ~
u c c u
- '" ",=
jt;~:.a
~ S] ~
.9~"'CO "0
,a " ~ "g
"'- ....
~ ~.~ u
'" II ~ a
~ '~.8 "E
c.- 0 "'0
~.g - "
Q" 0.1:1 e
...;
.9
"....
~.i
's a
a ~
0'-
u"
"ij
"
e "
!;! "
" ~
Ct: "
8 -
'I: "'CO
" ;j
",-
'"
.8 S
,; "5 q.
oi ~ s
_~tt
" " "
,,'!: '"
::E ~ II
-
N
~
... ,
as
o"g
oil e
,~ 0
"'CO_
'c "'0
" "
~~
-
-
~ ~
.s2.:i
!;! '" !;!
..!!::j..!!
8 .; 8
'I: ~ 'I:
,,= "
'" " '"
-"~
"", 0
u : c
-~o
~ ~''::
u';; 13
....
N
~-~~
I
"
"
~
.,
-
~
OD-
e '"
8 ~.=-=
0"= 0 a
... '" e
,,- a 0
... 8 u ~
]-;..::~
'" ... ., '''' .
... = QO.~
.",~",..9 !:!,
" 0-
"g 64~"'O =
U 0 "" j C'II
coU'fJo
~"g6ab
_..-:9 ~ CI a'"
1:1 u U'-
e) e ... ~ u
~ C'II"'g ~-::
c.."'g :: ~.s
g.u~~"'O
'" a S ~ ~
-
'"
S
~
o
"
,S
O!
:;
...
]
-
~
~
~
....
~
.
N
N
~
~
-
-
"
!i
'-
~
{j
.:I""
,5 ~
-
c-
" "
~ ,g
~~
~i.J;!!i..
-
.i:-
S
~
:;
i;
..
~
"1
N
II
" '"
""'CO -
!;! " 0 .;
u nI _ U
... U C =
... - 0 =
o ~.- !:
:0--:: y U
" !!.:-1::.
C'iC'llO~
:3'O"S'"
8 ~ ~ .,
8'~ 8 O!
'I: ~ ..,~
!i "'CO"g II
b i3 " -
,=:.a a 0
5 ~ Sa,~
"'CO - -
-~~.g
.
ClJ
~ "a
&~
<>::~
I
=
~~
"" ...... .. .. ..
.. .. - u ~ ~
.. .. ~-s
Q'; ~8 e S
.. " " "
- .. <:"Q, "Q, "Q,
~Q " u "
" en en en
U
:5 I: ~ ?:! ~ ~
-'! M
-- -- N ;i
~ Q ... N ...
Q ...
I:
-'!
Q
Q
{
==
~
:.:
'"
o
~b
~::;...~
:.:OU'"
Q '" g: :; :H:
"-JO ::;;<_
~~5-~\C
~~~~~~
"-JiOi",u...
.Cr..>--
0<'"'::;;
u...
'10
.(
...
CiS
-
-
><
"-J
~
..
Q
I:
-'!
Q
Q
"
.. '"
1:8
~.!!
.:! ~
'i.c!
-oi!I
~
~
..
Q
~
""
"
'3
0"
"
..
~
'E
"
.S
t;a ~
- "
~;
l~
o "
.. "
[!!
"';
" Co
:.:.g
.
N
."
" "
""-=
.$u-
.. " ""
.. .. ..
:;:.9 :5
.. .. ..
:;;:c g'
.5 " ..
" 0 ..
is-oS
.:s"g,.,g
_ 1:1 .0
" .. ..
8='0
i1 8.~
>.u-;
.0.0
--""
."':;:; ..-
::-= ;:s.: .-
= _ .-cU
0.-_
"'O,.c CQ: cu
__"'0"'0
.
~.. ~ S
!;h
.5
~
"
5
~
~
..
"
Co
..
""
"
~
=
M
~
--
...
"1
-
"
:E
~
t:
8-
"
..
~
"0
'8
....
~
S
<t::
..
..
""
~
..
.S!
1:!
..!/
"8
..
10
~
.~
"
=:
~
"
'E
"
.s
I:::
~
.. ~
i~
" "
u "
N
M
-
M
?:!
M
--
~
~
N
....
;.:)
~
..
"
10
1;
..-
"-
.":: U
"
.. -
= .'"::
.. 5
g 5
.~ 8
~cr
~]
S '"
" "
"'-
"....
..-
"" 'i
..
.. -
rJ
~'Sb
.5 Q
~o
'-=5
:t=
" "
'S: 8
" 0
"'-
...
.d
OJ
5
..
,S!
~
:S
..
,g
!
"
..
..
!;!
" ,
.. t1
~ 'Sb
:.e 0
..-
.. "
~"8
.
~
;i
.
"
]~
.~ t>
.8 ~
0-
~~
;.-
",,'"
:;"0
- ..
.. -
-:; ~
.~ ~:a
0_ 9
"'Sct:
'8 at!
.... .. "
~~"O
5",,'8
~""....
.. -
. .."
. 5
,13 ~ ..
..... U...-lI
vi
-5~
u-
S u
""
.. 0
.S! 5
~~
.~ &:
"" "
~=
8....
"U-:a
is :t
u c=
> 0-'
" Co""
~ :2 &
.. .. "
" ,,-
s 'Sb !;!
.. 0 "
VCS"l:l
0"" "
00.0
.
~
~
<;
,6
~
~
~"'"
.5 ~
- -
c "
" "
Co, .S:
~ -
,"$'
6:illfti;
~
1:: "
~ 'i:i
e."
Q:;~
::::-~
'-'-
~
=:
o
~~
~~..!!3
oucn
Q~f~~~
~~-::;:z"'-
~~--<\CI
~ u..1 0 N
~~?;r:s~-E
'-Jii:/cnU'"
=->--
0-<""::;:
~5
.J:
!::
==
=
:<
'-J
....
"
..
"
...
"
" '"
c~
" "
...~
.:! '"
....~
...
-~
~
"
..
~~
- "
;-Q
..
U
:5
~
{
=
c ~
oS N
c; ....
Q
c
oS
c;
Q
~
"
Q
c
oS
c;
Q
~
"
Q
..
.8
8
"
is.
"
en
~
N
....
"
....
-
H
:::
'13
8
o
U
.~
'$
~
--
..N
0-"
...-
c...~
" ..
'" ""
o 0
- !;.
00""
C "
''3 =
"
=B
"a.,"=
S a
::: a
" 0
"'u
~"5
:; oa
ir!"5
8~
.9
...
c
"
en
.
'"
"t
"8
::;:
Q
Z
Ii:
..
"
'$
""
8
o
U
go
~
"
Q
.,,;
.........
".8
~ ..
e ocr
.!:!O
...
"
en
~
:q-
....
~
~
-
...
N
If.! en =
~ &>0.2
o";.o~1!
= -= -a .9"5 e
O..c oo~ u"';
"8 'i .5 .g,:g "
a..."8 _... a .
"'uu!3=~jg
u _ ~ c C'd.- 0
'$ cu... u -..='_
....0.... a = ... is.
a 5/'g -;; = :1 a
8 ~ ":6- !;!.!! !1J
... rJeI: " ";;0 01
B " i;'.... =.~ ..
elf = -' fa IS 0
1;0 ~ 0... ~ ,?;-....
" " " c ; s a
-....c="'C:o
.5... _ 0 c'" ~
~;'O..ca.su:'::'
_= v:I c:: 0
--V;coouS
cu8utoo!::>-.......
o._[~~~~
..9 = 0'- " ......
u fooI- - Q ... Q.,
i) ~ ~ ~ of 8 =
Q~"Q~~.s.s
....
i-~
..
.8
c
u
o
.1
I~ .~
,~. '~I~I'
. '. . .:'.
. .
~~ '. .:'0
!~; '. .f~'..~
...
": .
'-+-
..,
"
-:S
't! U
~u
o~
- a
.. ..
"r; ..s
" -
!j ::;
" ""
. "
""..
" .;
... c
:5 .,g
80S
. "
....!:i
~ cr
!.-u
~"8
":' a
~ -
<: ~
z.=
0""
~ ~
o :g
u
N
N
-"
~
'13
':>c a
~ 0
"5 u
... "5
1 ~
~ ~
~ -:3
~ .~
~ :!
a :;
'"
" "
..
a
..
..9
..
"
...
~
.~
"
eI:
....4 N
...
;g
"
i>::
r 1
" en
c ....
= 0
"
.r:- 0
'8 .~
::;: ~
,.; I
N
"
=
....
...
..
...
..::>
e
~
o
z
~
v;
....
'"
>.
....
-
"
'"
=
~
.~
-s.
is
1:_
~~
~ 0
...-
:...-i
j rJ
.....
"'-:3
j'~
iSrf
1!'~
- "
I;!.s
~
.!! /;'
..:.=
~ 8. ....
.;
~
v;
....
"
-:S
, "
:; 0
a S-
a... .
o ,,11"\
y It'; ~
~CCI_
~.... .
.." .8 ==
~ .S
...s...
00';1: "
.a ~ ~
,,"-
oos: ~
...."-
:f~ li
'C.!!s .~
~ 5 S
~c;fP
a'i: -
,,~ cr
"'... "
=.s :g
.............
j~j
.t1
~
-
"
~
'<:
~
{j
..::~
.5 ~
- -
c "
" "
~ .~
Q~
5: [J~;:i:
~
l"~
~~
~~
_ N
'-'-
.. -
fo " .,g
Q S
" '::I "
.. " - 8
- ..
~Q "
0
Q
c.J
S !: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.!! ~ '" ...; t:i ~
~ ;; ... ...
Q
j
..
:.:
1:1:
o
~ti
~!:;...:!I
:.:oc.J'"
QI:I:I:I:==~g:
[oJO..,,<-
~~a-~....-
~ r-. .J. N
[oJO~ < 0,",
1:1: c.JI:I:=
[oJ "'c.J'"
=-;.---
O-<~"
~5
.J:
...
==
-
-
><
[oJ
C
oS
;;
Q
l
IQ
~
..
Q
"
" '"
C..!I
" ..
"'-
~ ~
...~
..
-~
~
C
oS
;;
Q
~
..
Q
'"
"
...
:.!!
.f:)
"
-
'"
"
"
8.
=
'"
"
.~
.f:)
.,g
~ .,;
"
~.t:
" 0
'S: 00
".!j
~ ~
~ ~
00=
~'"
.- :;
>-
N
c .5
0-=
g.'i
'" "
" 0
~.",
.f:)~
.,g-
Fj1
~ :!
".-
os: :s
" 00
1:1: "
,-
, ~
~
,,~>.
:a =.'"
/:,,,,U
" " -
;>..5 Q
~"'O~
'" " "
... =
8.!a 0
'E~ u
,,- "
rnll-::
...;
~
~
'"
!i
.5
'"
"
I.:
~
"
'"
'<i
o
-
"
~;:;-
.":= ....u
a... ~
8.2 =
8 go :!
-:5. cc:
.~ ~ '"
.fi ~ :;
u ~ U
... 1! "8
~.~ "
_ > 0
,,- Z
"S; &:
,,~ I
'"
.; ~
...
..
~':J.1
~
'"
...
N
"'...
~'i
..!J '"
~~
""i;J
" ,,"
" ...-
"'S.. ... ~
- "
'" o.~
U "";j
'tj -0....
" "
] !31
" "-
o 0 u_
:s "8 g:
a 8-"
.2 u ~
"'..c .-
"" - 8
~ !i ~
Cd .....u
.8'~ B
: ~ 'a
= -...
"" " "
.s~~
0;
'"
o
8
B
<!
~
&:
"
-:3
!i
1:1:
..
,j
~
-
...
~
".;
...
-
""
"'"
~
"
::i
8
"
"
.~
0;
"8
E
"
"
'S:
"
c::
"2 ~
.. "-
-:3 "
.~ u ""
~= 000
...., "~.-
~ U' ...
. :; ~: =
'" - "
.!! ~"'O ~ ~
,,'S: "
U '.0 ea . c:I
~'i9 3] E:
=~~.~s
U'J _.:l C u
.. e c; fP:5
~!! " " "
" ~.~ ~.,g
..... CG=
l;>"1 J!J''''
.~ 'S: oS. t:I ~
~ .'" >- " I:::
'ii .- - '- 8 co:
c; ~~~th-;J
<I; '" /:' :; -"
.::;- o;.!a j --8
:~ "8::: :a ~
" 8 ~ If
'j! !i 5 ~ ....:a ~
'(' 1:1: Z.f:) "...
""
~ ..,;
...
..
N
~
~
....
'"
:;
!i
-
-
"
..::
....
o
J!J
]
-
.~
"
"
~~ ~
"'0':::' a.
_.~ =
8.~ .=
~:; B
.. l;> <!
"'S:
:a.",
"".-
" a
!t ~
'(j
"
'8'
""
"
-:3
~
..
-d
i
0;;
-
'"
.~
~
{l
.:;"'"
.~ ~
- -
<:> '"
., -
c
~ '",
,,6-
~fiJi:!
~
"S; '-
~ ~
e-"
<>::~
~~
-'"
'-'-
~ - -
" "
~ " ~ ~
" s s
l: 'i!.!j ><2
60 !i !i
- '" '" 0 0
S'Q <( Z Z
..
u
3 I: 'i 'i ~
.!! .... -
N N o.
e= c; .... ... ....
Q ...
I: 'i ~ ~.
.... ....
.!! N N 0
c; .... ... -
Q ...
!
= '" 0
'"
j ....
~
..
~ Q
0
~t;
~!:;t;f!! I:
o '" .!!
Q~cr:~~~ " -;
" '" Q
[;Wo"":;: .... I:.!j
~~5-~-c " ..
""....
~~~~~~ ~ ~
"''<
r;.;':I 1'.r.It.)~ Co
=->-- -0<:1
000("":;: ~ ~
u... ..
"'0 Q
I
<
...
-
= '"
- -
- ~ , ..s ] ""
>< ""
'" 1:: ~ .. iii
[;W 0 c o , '" 'ij 's.
U .12 bD..c .~ " ~ e c:J .~ ~-
c. .e :, 6 "1j rJ ~iE ~
" ;.c; - "
'" e c 9 e -5 ..s ~ ""
- '" ... 0 !i ~ u ~ c.-
'" ~
.8 ~ c-;JU .. c .:!I -="'0..9
1.:= - 8 .. 0 ~ >-
:J !i &"B c - u :E! "" C !i
.... .. " iii .. "
.. .. .- "'a J! u "1j .:! 013 -"'''''
Co - 'ij""-5 S ... ~~-:9
.8 8 ..
E iii " " .. ~ tJ -"'8 " ..
"B "..... ~ :a .. " ~ co ~ S ""Sj
"" ':;.!:! u Co- " " ... ~ .'"
~~ ~ C ""':3-:1 .;:: "",~ ::-> e ~~ >-t!-5
..!a co ... C _ " " .... =fi
0; " 0.(,,1 ..cI "" '0 - o - "B .:!Ei: '"
0'- ]~.~ iii iii ~ iii..!! oS " ::
" .= ~ "
"".:!I '13 .. "'S..-= .><2 .c 0 .8 .:1"~ -iii
1iI~ .!! .!! ~..,. " .. .J!~ 8 g "" "'':9 a:
... - " ~
~ "0 ..." .... ...... '" 0
co .9 ::!'~ '0 = .- "
~.ti U 'a .. .... C " ~ 0 = S'~ 8
= - co ~u :J ..cI U 1:1 .
8 & ~ co Jj-~ '" " ... ;; .c:J 'j's 8 ~ iii
.. ~ 'ij o..s S ~ ::! 1.:=- .. .~"O ~
0'"" Q ...."'...-:... ~ ..;:."" " a 0 " t! " 8".9'~
a iii "'6>- ~
"'~ iii .- .9 - .- .. - -
.. .. C -"'~..c "
!i >- "" i5 -"" .....:: ,,'- .5 "B co ... [
- ~ !3-~ " " ~ ~ 0$ ~.~] ~
u.~ aJ 0 " ~j
~u " "" ""E- .~ co ~t2
u " ...-5 ..!a c. - ~~ -iE t!iE "
o " -
~ l' u U"'; GJ 8-5 8~~~ ""
N ~a-..!! ,...; N ,.; I .. I
.... N .~ ..,
Ei: " .. u .': .. ~ ~
.. ~'a
co
ci .c fa: :!:
""
~'2.k
.t!
~
-
"
~
.~
o
{j
.;:"'"
.~ ~
- -
" "
10 10
~ .~
QO'
5: :f~~:.
~
"€ '-
;>..7Z
~~
~~
.... ~,
~~
c:>
- "
" Q
.. i::!
..
... - ..
B'Q
Q
U
S !:
.!
e: c;
Q
j
:a
II:
~
Qt
~!:;...:!3
outIJ
Q~::;~g:
~~=~~;
~~~~~~
[ojQi1t1Ju'"
=->--
0<'"'::;:
u...
"(0
<
...
-
!
-
><
[oj
"
" ..
!:..!!
" ..
"'"i
~ ..
....<
...
-.os
I:::!
!:
.!
c;
Q
l
=
~
Q
!:
.!
c;
Q
5-
Q
00''''
" 0 "
'C eo CO;
:; 8 '"
" 5 8
"". ~
'0 :f 5].
.:!i.g 00
i5"~
.s &!3
"o.c
a... ....
!;! 0 iJ
0= ... u
.. 8 a
e "
..!! "8 'S
"iii-",
".! "
- " ..
.. .. "
"'" 0
~ iij'ij
" " "
"'o....=:
" " I!!
.. g 0
......." .
::3~t:IOl:IO
" .. 5.5
u ......... e
","::i ..._
_.~ ........
.;
"'00
iij.5 "iii
",'" -
o " "
_yO
" Sa.;
>. u v
U Go) ... u
... ~ ".~
0...5 E
-vue..
V'} =..CI u
~l:I-..c
'.:1 ::1"'-
e.!:; :; oS
s.S :l B
-;; 1 g..~
:f-'a g-
'13 "'0"5 ...
:;:;..!! ~
J!! "iii ?f '"
o g.u a
::E 'Q :; .~
.. " 5 :;
:;..""....
>'" "
CIJ 'r; If... U
" '" ~ a
'iiEo~
= C'# 1:1._
c; .... "'0
... 0 &) =
aJ g..s..E
.Q
"
00
o ..
:::'$!
"
"....
'0':; I) ~
~ u a CI
.8.s~ 8
..... en .= ~
J 5 :a E
.~ ~j J
Z3 's; ~ ~ "8
.~ ff'i '0 "'0
..... ... CtI E
:6g>1i "'.c
bl)'-'O' B
c v... t:IO
'0:; '" ~
~ t.6 ~ g
"".,g::l .I:>
....- .....
~....= '"
'B] ~ B
::2 ~::I ::2
...; N M
i..~~
..
"
'"
o
]
...
~
i:i
"
...
-
i:i
..
..
00
.;
8
..
"
o .
'" "
OIl;:;
"
:;;:f
" 0
-a 0=
"iii ::J
!d
... "
" '"
~"
.=1;
.:!"t;
.. .
~a
.- ..
i:i~
" 0
==~
...,:
'"
a
.~
~
a
00
~
~
'"
'0
B 'C
~ ~
o "iii
s.. '0
Jj ~
~~
- -
" "
" "
... ...
- -
vi ..0
:3 >.~
" .. 0
CJ 0 0 >.
a _.I:>
U "'='''''0 "'0
u C u u
~ ~<;;.5
.. ,,- "
~~~c
u u ce .B
a t: - "
~~~...
j~~~
'5 ~ :I ~
.. :!'C .!3
....:1 OJ ~
O;a'" 0
.. "
" "...
:...:g..8 :;
.....
'" 00 'd :!
'1;.e.g, "
... " 0 "
. U'" ~
....." "'"
'E .S 13 .. t!
B.~~iu
... .. ~._.s
- Q.... en 0
r-:
'0
~
" .;
.!i a
1,=
~~
... a
:; g>
:;;
~"
E.s
.I:>
.- ..
::I &
~ 0
u]
.s "
,,'"
.5 "8
~!:
B"S
" "
Q::;
u
i
r-:;
;:
5
8-
{j
.s...
.5 ~
'51;
::: 5
~ .~
Q~
~m:t
~till
~
5 '-
~
&...
~~
::;-.~
~~
- ..
- " 0
.&J
r. ., 8
='= "ii:! 8
- ..
~Q 0
0
.,
u
E
S I: ~.~m ~~~
.!!
~ Q - -..,
Q - -
...
I:
oS
Q
Q
i '" '"
~ ~
= t.. ~t
~ r; ""'0 ...."'"
~ B.... - 0
.. -
!:: .. " ..
-8"'" .,g .9 ..
".- ~
~ '0 -' .... <0.- -
~ ....u:J" o~~
Qt;
~f:;t;!!J I:
o "" oS
Q~~~i~ " Q
.. .. Q
(oJo~::E - ~:!
CI'J~ = _ .. .. ..
~",,~::;j"'!=~ ""'-
~ ~
gjo U~-E ...~
(oj ""u'" Co
=-~-- -cOd
0<""::E ~ r;
~6 ~
I
<
F-
-
=
- '"
- ..
>< .~ 0
8 OJ
~ ~ ~ 8
". ....."6
...E! .. 'i E.'a
0 Q. ~~ ~
... 8
-
.... ~::=- Q. ~....
0
:J " 0 8 9 .s
to: .>
'" 0 ~ "" -
8 ""'- 00"
0< ...E!.! ~
00 U...
.9 .= en 1!~~
I!! .. 0
0 ...:; -gij..... -
... .a_ o .. "
" ... .. e..e .g
0 15 ~ e ~'3
'"
<J ~- 8.-
o Co 4.):::..c
" e !;? ....&J _
Co '6 "
.9 ".- = 0
..t:.":: ~ C e
"
0 I)"" I) to) c. .
.:; ... 0 > _ 0 u
-"'" o C'I:!- tJ
._ U -
~ I) 0 us.;> ."::
"'" ... :; o.g e
.. . '!: 0 go So.-o a
<.[ e e .. c.. = 0
~ .. Q.. fa CG U
..,,; oj ...
~
~
f';
-
'"
::
.S:
8-
{j
..::~
.5 ~
- -
<:> '"
:: -
\r .~
~<S
6:~lliL(
""
t: ,:::
o ~
!}o
~:::;j
::::-N'-
~~
~-!O
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item qA -D
Meeting Date 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution 'I.~S3 Adopting the proposed boundary for the
Eastlake Maintenance District No.1 Zone D (Salt Creek I Area)
b) Resolution /1. ~S, Approving the initiation of
proceedings, describing the improvements and directing the
City Engineer to file a "Report"
c) Resolution II.:. 3 SS Waiving the Publ ic Hearing and
approving the Engineer's "Report"
d) Resolution 1c.,~S~ Ordering improvements, establishing
Zone D, confirming the Diagram and Assessment for Eastlake
Maintenance District No.1, Zone D (Salt Creek 1 Area)
SUBMITIED BY: Director of Public Works ~Qv
Director of Parks and Recreation
oil-
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ;.-i jG. (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_)
Through the adoption of the above resolutions, the Council will accomplish the
formation of Zone D within Eastlake Maintenance District No.1, (Salt Creek 1
Area) which will maintain open space lots and landscaped parkways adjacent to
said lots along East H Street, Mt. Miguel Road and Proctor Valley Road within
the Salt Creek 1 Subdi vi s i on. The exi st i ng "overall" Eastlake Maintenance
Di stri ct No. 1 whi ch currently i ncl udes all the Eastlake development, the
Greens, the Olympi c Tra i ni ng Center and the Salt Creek 1 Areas wi 11 be in
charge of maintaining all street medians and the SR-I25 corridor within the
project. Salt Creek I property owners wi 11 pay thei r pro port i onate share of
the overall maintenance cost.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On September 12, 1989, by Resolution No. 15299, the City Council approved the
tentative map for Chula Vista Tract No. 89-9, Salt Creek I Subdivision and on
May 14, 1991, by Resolution No. 16166 approved the final maps for Units 1, 2
and 3 of the development. The conditions of approval of the tentative map
required that all open space lots and SR-I25 right-of-way be included in an
open space ma i ntenance di stri ct. The subdi vi der requested the format i on of
such district on a letter dated January 18, 1990.
The Salt Creek I Subdi vi si on is presently i ncl uded in the exi st i ng Eastlake
Maintenance District No. 1 (zones A, B and C). Currently, the District
maintenance responsibilities are distributed as follows:
1. The "overall" District is in charge of the maintenance of the
landscaping and irrigation improvements in the landscaped medians
along designated public streets and the SR-I25 right-of-way.
'\~ I
Page 2, Item q~ -D
Meeting Date 9/24/91
2. In Zone "A", the EastLake Homeowners Association is responsible for
the maintenance of the open space lots and landscaped parkways.
Zone "S" (EastLake Greens) woul d a 1 so have a homeowners's
association performing the same duties. In Zone "CO (Olympic
Tra i ni ng Center), it is pl anned that the San Di ego Nat i ona 1 Sports
Training Foundation will maintain their open space areas. The
proposed hiking/biking trail within the Center would also be
maintained by the Foundation until such time as additional offsite
portions of the trail are completed and the City assumes its
maintenance.
The zones are set up as "ghost" di stri cts to provi de for future
assessments and maintenance by the City in case the private
maintenance does not meet City standards.
The designated streets within EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 include
among others, the port i on of East H Street from EastLake Dri ve to Mt. Mi gue 1
Road and the SR-125 corridor along the westerly Salt Creek 1 subdivision
boundary. These facilities are being constructed in conjunction with the
development of the Salt Creek I Subdivision.
Considering that Salt Creek I is already in the EastLake Maintenance District
No.1, staff feels that the same organizational scheme should be adopted for
the Salt Creek I Subdivision. Therefore, staff is recommending the creation
of an additional ZONE "0" (to be administered by the City) within the existing
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 (see Exhibit A & B), which will provide
for the maintenance of the open space lots and landscaped parkways created by
said subdivision. All street medians and the SR-125 corridor within the Salt
Creek I Project will be maintained by the "overall" EastLake Maintenance
District No.1 and Salt Creek I property will pay their proportionate share of
the overall cost. The distribution of maintenance responsibilities and annual
cost estimates for fiscal year 1992-93 would be as follows:
Zone 0
Maintenance
Responsibilities
Open space lots and
landscaped parkways
adjacent to said lots
Street medians and
SR-125 corridor
Total Annual
Assessment
1992-93
Annual Assessment
per residence
unit
$70,6BO
$
425.78
"Overall"
District
$84,590
1
$
14. 80~
lMa;ntenance cost for East H Street medians and SR-125 right-af-way
within the Salt Creek I Subdivision
~eflects only the effect of adding the new improvements (SR-125 and
street medians) to the existing 1991-92 EestLake Maintenance District No.1
As illustrated in Exhibit "I" of Engineer's Report (attached), in two years
the Zone "0" assessment for single family detached houses will drop to $325
from $425. These maintenance district assessments are above the two percent
1 imits for property taxes and assessments being proposed for this district.
Maintenance Districts are not debt on properties like the Mello Roos
q .. 2..
Page 3, Item qA -l)
Meeting Date 9/24/91
Di stricts, and City Infrastructure di stri cts, but are annual encumbrances on
each lot.
The total 1992-93 maintenance cost for Zone "D" is distributed among the 166
single family units currently under construction. As new phases of the
project are developed and dedicated to the City, the diagram, assessment cost
and spread would be adjusted accordingly.
The maintenance cost per unit for the "overall" EastLake District is presented
for information only. It was estimated considering the effect of the addition
of the new improvements (East H Street medi ans and SR-125) and res ident i a 1
lots on the existing district (1991-92). The information about new EastLake
Greens improvements and lots projected to be included in the District is not
yet available and was not included in this calculation. The addition of the
new Salt Creek I improvements would raise the 1991-92 annual assessment for a
single family dwelling from $7.51 to approximately $14.80. The final 1992-93
assessment shall include all new EastLake and Salt Creek I additions. Council
wi 11 be requested to approve the new assessment duri ng the 1992-93 renewal
process.
Through the adoption of the above resolutions, the Council will have
accomplished the following:
1. Approve the boundary of the EastLake Ma i ntenance Di stri ct No.1, Zone "D"
(Salt Creek I area).
2. Initiate proceedings and order the preparation of the Engineer's report.
3. Waive the public hearing and approve the Engineer's report.
4. Order the improvements, establish Zone D, and confirm the assessment and
diagram for the EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 Zone "D" (Salt Creek
I area).
It is anticipated that maintenance activities will begin during January 1993.
Therefore, assessments are not being levied at this moment. Council will be
requested to levy the 1992-93 annual assessment when it is appropriate to do
so.
The wai ver of the publ i c heari ng is proposed pursuant to Section 22608.1 of
Article 2 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 stating that if all the
owners of property within the territory to be incorporated into the District
have gi ven wri tten consent to the proposed format i on, the Di stri ct may be
formed wi thout not ice and heari ng or fi 1 i ng of an Engi neer' s Report or both.
The Baldwin Company (the sole proprietor of the entire property to be included
in subject district) submitted a letter for waiver of public hearing on
January 18, 1990.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. Cost of di stri ct format i on are paid by the developer
through a deposit. Annual staff and administration costs are included in the
assessment.
WPC 5745E
LdeT/OS-023
q-3
SEP-19-'91 THU 11:49 lD:qTY..Rf- C.HU_l.ELYISTH TEL NO:FHX 619 691 :'171
~~<.J2
i:
.,',!
~' ..,
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
. ,
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contn'butions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: ',~.
. .
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, .:i.e., contrllctor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
The Baldwin Company
FN Projects, Inc.
2, If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list~he names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership. " :;
"
..
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above Is non-profit organization or a tru$!;1ist the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or' beneficiary or
tr ustor of tho trust, . ; ~ .
,'J"
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Board~ Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? . Yes _
No.!- If yes, please indicate person(s): .
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultant.s or independent
COntriJ,cT.ors who. vcu have asJ~ed to represent you b"fore.the l"itv in this ma..tt~. & A
Munlclpal Fl'hance...-..":. .~'" Meade . '"Davl~ Ke!"l"tn1;!l" -K!Ht;ner ssoc.
nll';;>\Ju EII~lln::'CL';'.~-I.~.":".Lllcun; .:!lla.u~l.nessey f1Q.~ Bt:~...1. B~81:R. .:~:a1f'hilJi'. Il'~r""s
I1~Il.tir ~ 8k"at1~ FatS! Gaff f u.........~o....h1ro
TR~ D~'Au';... """-J?"""'Y Clay"";"" "'-oisi, El;,.,~ho~h Tl"\ng C:~OtJ'O T\ny'o
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contn'buted more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No!!.. If yes, state which
Councilmember(s);
Person Is defined as: "Any individual.fIrn~ co-partJlership,joinr venture. associnlion, socwl club,fraternal organization, corporation,
es/ntl!. trus~ receiver, syndicate, this and any other cnunl)'. city and counl'l)l, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision,
or any other group or combinntion octing lIS a unit.'
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
9/20/91
Date:
rP.L~-
Signature of contractor/applicant
Claudia Troisi / The Baldwin Company
~'(!\...o.rLE.1XT)
q-L(
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
ptoYbcd: 111301901
RESOLUTION NO. '''~~.3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BOUNDARY FOR
THE EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ZONE D
(SALT CREEK AREA)
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has granted approvals
for the development of a community known as Salt Creek I; and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map
for Chula Vista Tract 89-9, Salt Creek I Subdivision, required
that all open space lots and future SR 125 right-of-way be
included in an open space maintenance district; and
WHEREAS, the owner submitted a letter requesting the
formation on January 18, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista,
has been presented and has received a map showing and describing
the boundaries of the area proposed to be assessed in a
maintenance district under the provisions and authority of Chula
Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 and the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California as incorporated by
said Chapter 17.07;. said maintenance district known and
des ignated as EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE D (SALT
CREEK I AREA), (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District Zone").
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
SECTION 1.
That the above recitals are all true and
correct.
SECTION 2. That a map of the Maintenance District
showing the boundaries of the proposed and existing Maintenance
Distr ict Zones and lands and property to be assessed to pay the
costs and expenses of the proposed maintenance designated as
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ZONE "D" (SALT CREEK 1) is
hereby submitted, and the same is hereby approved and adopted.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
9314a
;
D. Richard Rud
City Attorney
Assistant
qA -I
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA INITIATING PROCEEDINGS, DESCRIBING
THE IMPROVEMENTS AND DIRECTING THE CITY
ENGINEER TO FILE A "REPORT" FOR EASTLAKE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ZONE "D" (SALT
CREEK I AREA)
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Ci ty of Chula Vista has granted approvals
for the development of a community known as Salt Creek I; and
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map
for Chula Vista Tract 89-9, Salt Creek I Subdivision, required
that all open space lots and future SR 125 right-of-way be
included in an open space maintenance district; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista at
this time proposes to initiate proceedings for the formation of a
special maintenance district zone pursuant to the terms and
provisions of Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 and the
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California as
incorporated by said Chapter 17.07, in what is known and
designated as EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1 ZONE "D" (SALT
CREEK I AREA) (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District Zone"); and
WHEREAS, there has been submitted for approval a map
designated by the name of this Maintenance District Zone,
generally showing the area and property to be assessed in said
Maintenance District; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body is desirous to
preparation of a "Report", as authorized by Chula vista
Code Chapter 17.07 and Section 22585 of the Streets and
Code of the State of California.
order the
Municipal
Highways
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
RECITALS
SECTION 1.
That the above reci tals are all true and
correct.
SECTION 2. That the public interest and convenience
requires, and this legislative body does propose at this time to
initiate proceedings for the formation of a special Maintenance
District Zone for the following works of maintenance:
C\6 _I -1-
A.
Maintain open space lots owned in fee by
Chula Vista, including slopes adjacent
right-of-way. Maintenance will conform
landscape plans for the subject area.
the Ci ty of
to SR 125
to approved
B. Maintain landscaping and irrigation systems
improvements in the street parkways adjacent to the
open space lots located along East "H" street, Mt.
Miguel Road and Proctor Valley Road. Maintenance
will conform to the approved landscape plans for
subject area.
For particulars as to the extent of the works of
improvement and maintenance, reference shall be made to the
Engineer's "Report", which upon approval shall be on file in the
office of the City Clerk and open for public inspection.
DESCRIPTION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
SECTION 3. That said works of maintenance will provide
a special and direct benefit to the property and parcels of land
within the boundaries of the Maintenance District Zone, and for a
general description of the area and boundaries of said proposed
District Zone, reference is made to a map previously approved by
this legislative body and identified by the same of this
Maintenance District, which map in on file with the transcript of
these proceedings and open for public inspection.
REPORT OF THE ENGINEER
SECTION 4. This this improvement is hereby referred to
the Ci ty Eng ineer, who is hereby di rected to make and fi Ie the
"Report" generally containing the following:
A. Plans and specifications for the improvements;
B. An estimate of the costs of the works of maintenance
for the project and referenced fiscal year;
C. A diagram for the Maintenance District, showing the
area and properties proposed to be assessed by zones;
D. An assessment of the estimated costs of the works of
maintenance, assessing the net amount upon all
assessable lots and/or parcels within the
Maintenance District and its constituent zones, in
proportion to the benefits received.
That upon completion of the preparation of
"Report", the original shall be filed with the City Clerk,
shall then submit the same to this legislative body for
immediate review and consideration.
said
who
its
-2-
q,e..~
FISCAL YEAR
SECTION 5. That the
costs and expenses relating to
1992 and ending June 30, 1993.
above "Repor t" shall include all
the fiscal year commencing July 1,
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
~. (l:L~'~
D. Richard Rudolf, Assistant
City At torney
93l5a
qf> ..53-
RESOLUTION NO.\\o!.'5~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND
APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S "REPORT" REGARDING
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE "D"
(SALT CREEK I AREA)
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Ci ty of Chula Vista has granted approvals
for the development of a community known as Salt Creek I; and
WHEREAS, the owner of the land within the boundaries of
the proposed assessment district zone has filed his consent to
the formation of the proposed zone without notice or hearing and
the adoption of the first annual assessment; and
WHEREAS, section 22608.1 of Chapter 2, Article 2 of the
Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 states that if all the
owners of property within the territory proposed to be formed
into an assessment district or zone have given written consent to
the proposed formation, the District may be formed without notice
of public hearing of filing of an Engineer's "Report"; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista,
pursuant to the provisions of Chula vista Municipal Code Chapter
17.07 and Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California (the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972") as incorporated by said Chapter 17.07, did, by previous
Resolution, propose to initiate proceedings and ordered the
preparation of an Engineer's "Report" for the formation of a
special maintenance district zone, said assessment district zone
known and designated as EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE
D (SALT CREEK I AREA), (hereinafter referred to as the
"Maintenance District zone"); and
WHEREAS, there has now been presented to this
legislative body the "Report" as required by said Chula Vista
Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 and Division 15 of the Streets and
Highways Code and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this legislative body has now carefully
examined and reviewed the "Report" as presented, and is satisfied
with each and all of the items and documents as set forth
therein, and is satisfied that the assessments have been spread
in accordance with the benefits received from the maintenance to
be performed, as set forth in said "Report".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
<\c. -I
-1-
SECTION 1.
That the above recitals are all true and
correct.
SECTION 2. The request of the landowner waiving the
public hearing is hereby approved.
SECTION 3.
of the following:
That the "Report" as presented, consisting
A. Plans and specifications
B. Estimate of cost
C. Diagram of the District
D. Assessment of the estimated cost
is hereby approved
the City Clerk as a
inspection.
and is ordered to be filed in the Office of
permanent record and to remain open to pUblic
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Wor ks
93l6a
t<-LJ f\-~~
D. ichard Rudolf, A lstant
City Attorney
-2-
qe. ..2
RESOLUTION NO. It- ~5t.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS,
ESTABLISHING ZONE D, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM
AND ASSESSMENT FOR EAST LAKE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE D (SALT CREEK 1 AREA)
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista has
initiated proceedings for the formation of a special maintenance
district pursuant to the terms and provisions of Chula Vista
Municipal Code Chapter 17.07 and the "Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California as incorporated by said
Chapter 17.07, said special maintenance district zone known and
designated as EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE D (SALT
CREEK I AREA), (hereinafter referred to as the "Maintenance
District Zone").
entire
letter
WHEREAS,
property
for waiver
The Baldwin Company (the sole proprietor of the
to be included in subject zone) submitted a
of public hearing on January 18, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the pUblic hearing was waived pursuant to
Chapter 17.07 and Streets and Highways Code section 22608.1 (part
of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972) stating that if all
the owners of property within the territory to be incorporated
into the District or Zone have given written consent to the
proposed formation, the District may be formed without notice and
hearing or filing of an Engineer's Report or both; and
WHEREAS, the Engineer's
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1, ZONE D
approved by previous Resolution.
"Report"
(SALT CREEK
for EAST LAKE
I AREA), was
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby resolve as follows:
RECITALS
SECTION 1.
That the above recitals are all true and
correct.
SECTION 2. That EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1,
ZONE D (SALT CREEK I AREA) is hereby formed pursuant to Chapter
17.07 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and the "Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California.
-1-
'\1> . \
SECTION 3. That the boundaries of said maintenance
district zone are fixed and established as those set forth in the
approved Engineer's "Report".
SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience
requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the work of
maintenance as set forth in the Engineer's "Report" and as
previously declared and set forth in the Resolution of Intention.
SECTION 5. That the assessments contained in said
"Report" are hereby confirmed upon the respective subdivision of
land in the Maintenance District Zone D, in the amounts as set
forth in said final "Report".
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
93l7a
ssistant
-2-
'tt> ..2.
MEMORANDUM
September 24, 1991
File No. 05-023
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City Manager t ~ I-
Director of Public Works '!f/
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Salt Creek Open Space District
ITEM \I
Vice Mayor Moore asked a question concerning the City's policy and practice of including street
median island landscape maintenance in regards to the Salt Creek item on tonight's agenda.
This item is to set up an Open Space Maintenance District to maintain the common open areas,
H Street median islands, landscaping for SR 125 grading, and project slopes. This project is
part of the overall Eastlake Maintenance District.
When Eastlake I was approved in the mid 1980's, it was decided that a homeowners association
would be created to maintain all the on-site facilities including: private park areas, lake,
swimming pools, and private recreation buildings and facilities. However, the median islands
in public streets were in a City Maintenance District with a very low assessment, about $7 per
year. The reasons for that decision to keep the medians as a city maintenance responsibility
were to be consistent with other developments and policies since 1978 and liability. We felt that
a contractor doing continuous work in the middle of a street, should have a contract with the
City as opposed to having a contract with a homeowners association.
Other projects that have Open Space Districts to maintain the Median Islands include: Terra
Nova for East H Street; Rancho Del Rey for East H Street and Otay Lakes Road; Eastlake
Business Center and Eastlake Greens for Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road; and
Eastlake Parkway.
JPL:WP51DOC/SALOPEN2
092491
_ ~ __~ ~.EF' .;'....;-.'~l TUE [1'3:.:...1.'3 III:(:ITI' [IF I::HULR IIP:;TH TEL t-.lI]:FR:: 619 t=,.31 5171
d~d~ddql
j:f.4113 PD2
MEMORANDUM
September 23, 1991
Pile No. HX.()lS
To:
Councilman Jerry RindQn~
Subjoc\,
'I'"
John Goss, City Manager,~ 1(,
,f.'
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works ryv
( '~stions Raised Regarding September 24 Council Agenda
Via:
From:
Item 9: 'F r. ';\lake 1\1aintenance District. Salt Creek Area
Sirn:e In.:'.: mai!1!enance district M$eSS/TJe'1lS are above the 2 % limit jar properry [ax and
(f! ',t,'5I' "~1.: r'e!'~g ,t' ',:sed for the district. wlw! step" e/l$u"e that the 166 fwme buyer" are
a."are l:trhe annuc.! ..:"eume'1l,,?
,'\~, .n ail of O'.1r :;ubdivisions, we require the developer to disclose all applicable costs of
purchasing the home, This disclosure includes the annual charges for the a~sessment districts,
aJl Mrl1o.Roos dist:im a.nd a.U open space maintenance district costs. Through thls disclosure
S\,1.i<.:, :It the buyer i,s ~iwan .t' all costs they will be incurring in the purchase of their homes.
l.;, '.~d is a C{Jj.')' l.f tj;~ di.dosllre statement for Salt Creek I from the Baldwin Company,
Item 10; Gradini If SR.12S
Be'
'j' 'ecei>1't;g cr/'dit up "
if the appruved cost estimates. Why not ]OO%?
;)evelopment Impact Fee ordinance the developer originally did not receive any credit
0:[,0 project was c" :nplete and st<\ff was able to certify the expenditures. That was later
amended to allo,", the developers to receive partial credit at 7~ % of the estimated cost once the
developer has posted all the noc~ssary wmpletion and material/labor bonds with the City and
awarded the contract. This was done be.cause the developers were laying out large amounts of
cash for the construction, bl't sli!\ havlng to pay fe{;s pending completion of the project. This
" ,., effect, requiring double fi.ncJlcing of the improverl'enrs The ;':",~ndment to allow partial
cre:.(\,. ",1J~v;ated this problem, HQwever, since credit'" ;;.:; being giver ,\.Cd solely on estimates,
the amendment to lhe DTF o,djr,ance included immt:;:Jiate credit based on only 75% of the
estimated cost. Full credit 0,[\ aij of the eligible expenditures wlll be given to the develope! in
arx:ordane;: with the DIF ordina.nce one;:, staff has been able to certi fy the expenditures,
CLS: (A:\SEPT24.MMO)
cc: Assistant City Manager
Deputy City Managers
Mayor/City Council
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 11#~'tt1 Authorizing the Baldwin Company to
construct a port i on of East H Street from EastLake Dri ve to
San Miguel Road, to grade a portion of SR 125 and receive a
credit reimbursement against the Transportation Development
Impact Fees
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~
, Ii-
REVIEWED BY: City Manager c; +,.1::)(;1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No...!.J
The Baldwin Company has requested authorization to construct a portion of East
H Street and SR 125 and receive credit reimbursement against Transportation
Development Impact Fees, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2251 as amended, for the
construction of said roads.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION:
In January 1988, the City establ ished a Development Impact Fee to pay for
transportation facil ities in the eastern territories of the City. Ordinance
No. 2289 provides that a developer may request authori zat i on from the City
Council to recei ve a credit reimbursement against Transportation Development
Impact Fees for construction of facil ities 1 isted in the ordinance. The
segment of East H Street for which authorization is being requested is between
EastLake Drive and San Miguel Road, approximately 3,900 feet. The portion of
SR 125, grading only, for which authorization is being requested is along the
westerly boundary of the Salt Creek I subdivision (see Exhibit A).
The Baldwin Company is currently constructing East H Street as a 4-lane
facility west of SR 125 and as a 6-lane east of SR 125 and is grading a
portion of SR 125 in conjunction with their development of Salt Creek I
subdivision. Attached is a copy of the request for authorization to receive
credit for the construction of these facilities.
The construction cost estimates for the facilities are as follows:
East H Street
(DIF projects 8 and 14)
SR-125 (Grading only)
(DIF Project No.1)
Total Estimated Cost
$1,994,200.00 1
$1. 295, 580 .00 f.
$3,289,780.00
lActual cost of East H Street within Salt Creek
~Total est;mated grading costs within Salt Creek
10 -,
Page 2, Item tlJ
Meeting Date 9/24/91
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2289, prior to completion of the improvements,
Ba 1 dwi n can recei ve credit up to 75 percent of the approved cost est imate.
Using the current estimate for East H Street and the estimated grading cost
for SR 125, Baldwin will be entitled to an immediate credit of 0.75
(3,289,780) = $2,467,335. The final amount of credit reimbursement will be
determined by the Director of Publ ic Works after completion of improvements
and will be based on actual final eligible cost.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. Baldwin will receive immediate credits of
$2,467,335 actual credits will be determined after the final determination of
DIF eligible costs.
lDT/Fil e: HX015
WPC 5718E
WPC 5718E
/D,Z
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE BALDWIN COMPANY TO
CONSTRUCT A PORTION OF EAST H STREET FROM
EASTLAKE DRIVE TO SAN MIGUEL ROAD, TO GRADE A
PORTION OF SR 125 AND RECEIVE A CREDIT AGAINST
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Baldwin Company has requested authorization
to construct a portion of East H Street and SR 125 and receive
credit against Transportation Development Impact Fees, pursuant
to Ordinance No. 2251 as amended, for the construction of said
roads; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2251 established a Development
Impact Fee to pay for transportation facilities in the eastern
territories of the City and said ordinance, as amended, provides
that a developer may request authorization from the City Council
to construct and receive a credit against Transportation
Development Impact Fees for construction of facilities listed in
the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the
authorization is being
San Miguel Road, and is
segment of
requested is
approximately
East H Street
between EastLake
3,900 feet; and
for which
Drive and
prior
credit
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2251 as
to completion of the improvements, Baldwin can
up to 75 percent of the approved cost estimate; and
amended,
receive
and the
entitled
and
WHEREAS, using the current estimate for East H Street
estimated grading cost for SR 125, Baldwin will be
to an immediate credit of 0.75 (3,289,780) = $2,467,335;
WHEREAS, the final amount of credit will be determined
by the Director of Public Works after completion of improvements
and will be based on actual final eligible cost.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the Baldwin Company
to construct a portion of East H Street from EastLake Drive to
San Miguel Road, to grade a portion of SR 125 and receive an
immediate credit of $2,467,335 against Transportation Development
Impact Fees.
Approved as to form by
~i4a~L~sistant
City Attorney
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
9308a
II) ,,3
.
.
fiX 00/
G
~._. RECE:V~jj
., J' Y OF' (" .......
'-, ~HUL' '''_
... '~""/"r-_ 1-0.. 'r'J.... 1,.
. 1'I't.t r'r.J._... ........
. iT I '":' 't::!j-_
/990 DEC 13 AM"'"'
9: S2
The Baldwin Company
Croftsmanship ill buildillg sillce 1956
December 11, 1990
Hr. Cliff SWanson
CITY 011' CHULA VISTA
276 1I'0urth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
RBI Construction of DIll' Projects with the Salt Creek I Grading
and Improvement Plans
D.ar Hr. Swan.on I
Th. Baldwin Company, a. developer of Salt Cr..k I, wish.s to con.truct
c.rtain Transportation DIll' projects as provided by Ordinanc. Number.
2251, 2289, and 2349 for credit and/or reimbursement. Resolution
Number 15299, which approved the Salt Cr..k I t.ntative map (Chula
Vista Tract 89-9), condition.d the approval on the con.truction of
thr.. Transportation DIll' projects I (1) a portion of Project No.1,
Stat. Route 125 North; (2) Project No.8, East "B" 8treet, Eastlake
Drive to State Route 125, and; (3) Project No. 14, East "B" Str..t,
Stat. Rout. 125 to future San Miguel Road.
Th. work to be done on Project No.1 includes design, .taking, grading,
storm drainage facilities and retaining walls as approved by Caltrans
and your department. The work for Project No. 8 includ.s grading,
pavement, curb and gutt.r, .idewalks, _dians, str..t lighting and
landscaping with the associated design and .ngin..ring f.... The work
on proj.ct No. 14 includes grading, pavement, curb and gutt.r,
sidewalks, ~ians, str..t lighting and landscaping with the associated
d.sign and .ngin..ring f.... Enclo.ed are the prel1m1n.ry ..timat.s
for .ach project.
Pl.a.e contact _ at your .arli.st convenience if you need additional
information.
Sincerely,
TBB rWIN COMPANY
~~::: IJ~
Vic. pr.sident
SPDlcsb
Enclo.ures
CCI Claudia Troisi
Roy Peace
10..S
11975 EI Camino Real . Suite 200 . San Diego, CA 92130 . (619) 259-2900
Exhlblt'A"
..
!","
UL T CREEK I
VICINITY MAP
_ac......
, \
" " CITY OF CHULA VISTA
" "....... COUNTY OF IAN DIEGO. 'TATE OF CAlFOIINIA
" "-
, --------------
-...".............
I
I
I
~
"
.
@
GRAPHIC ICAlE
~oo J 290
~
."
I
',.
~"'~
"
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
. ,
\ \ \
, . ,
, \ '
, ,
, .'
, .,
\ 1\
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~I
o
"'I
-'
!!S
CO
:i
,.;
:I .
i
,,,."'1
.-.,....
.
,
,
,
.
/
/
/
/
-ciiiow.;-? l 1/
, '
~ , /
\ ~/ /
\\ 1 1
1 1
1 /
/ 1
1':;- 1
I~ 1
1';:1
I,' 1
I,'~ 1
It;-I
I.:J'I
1 1
/ 1
1 /
" / 1
~"'- '-' 1
".!'~
) ("'-of: (
, ~"
-'""'.49. ....
/ ,'/Vi'
.....
8
ow
,"
~oI
.iI
.........
)
...n
r~~~.-tW''::u
u..... ,uea __ ....-.,
LEGEND
I_~ _....'""" "" _ __ _ono .--...
..,",_, .,-.ct oM! ....1....' C_ I I....... "'..-.. ,..
EJn ~_(.I. .. T" .;to, ., -." ntH .., ,. .."'". wn.. ...
,... ........ W-.-
...,ItI,II1'_..
----
.",IO;I~'
'MGP."'-"
"" u_.
pn,,~"""
@
.....,~_.
""n._ ~.. Mpn.... ....".......... "'A
--...... --
crn_
crn_-""'"''
.
.
<.
~
.
ua17 ~I.II.,.
1"l1t A2~
1.",,,vI. . C.IHIM"'- 12"0
(Jul....n.o
n.D,...._"'... ---
.._ u"'.._.."......u.......,
,,'I c.,. M""'" _ ,.. c_'" MC_'" M~'"
".. ...... .un 01 u.._
~.
MFS
~IJ"."
~"..c_.
c_n"''''_Goe
..
. \
-
. .
l
,
(
(
Revised 1/6/89
7'-":"Le (~y:.;.
v
ORDINANCE NO. 2289
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING ORDINANCE 2251 BY PROVIDING FOR DEFERRALS AND
ADDING TRAFFIC SIGNALS TO THE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1988, the City Council enacted
Ordinance No. 2251 adopting a fee to be paid by developers of
land within the Eastern Territories to finance construction of
transportation facilities, and
WHEREAS, developers of land are constructing major
transportation facilities and are also required to pay
Development Impact Fees on new' building construction prior to
completion of the transportation facility creating a double cost
to the developer, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2251 currently provides for a
credit after completion of a transportation facility improvement
and therefore it is necessary to amend Ordinance No. 2251 to
permit a procedure for requesting an early credit for Development
Impact Fees resulting from construction of facilities by
developers, and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to make other minor changes to
Ordinance 2251 in order to assure effective financing of the
transportation facilities, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received evidence
justifying the addition of traffic signals at the intersection of
East "H" Street and the entrance to Southwestern College to the
list of improvements to be financed by the fee in order to
implement and maintain compliance with the Circulation Element of
the City General Plan, and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2251 authorizes the City Council
to amend or modify the list of projects to be financed by the
fee, and
WHEREAS, the Ci ty Council finds that the findings and
determinations made in Ordinance No. 2251 ~ontinue to be true and
correct, and further that the amendment made by this ordinance
will further the purpose~ of Ordinance No. 2251.
NOW, THEREFORE, the. City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does ordain as:follows:
SECTION I: Section 3 of Ordinance No. 2251 is amended
to read:
~
"1.
( :."
-1-
II> .1
,
. .
( "
. f
SECTION 3: Transportation Facilities to be Financed by
the Fee.
'(
( a) The
fee
1.
2.
transportation facilities to be financed by the
established by this ordinance are: .
State Route 125 from Otay Lakes Road to State
Route 54.
State Route 125 from Southern
boundary to Otay Lakes Road.
EastLake
3. Telegraph Canyon Road from Interstate 805 to
Paseo Ladera.
4.
Telegraph Canyon Road from Paseo
Otay Lakes Road. (Including
Improvements at I-80S).
Ladera to
Interchange
5. Otay Lakes Road from Telegraph Canyon Road to
Eastern EastLake I boundaries.
6. Otay Lakes Road from East -H- Street to Bonita
Road.
7.
(
8.
9.
10.
11.
Otay Lakes Road from Telegraph Canyon Road to
the southern fee area boundary.
Interchange improvements at Interstate 805 and
East -H- Street.
{
East -H- Street through Rancho del Rey.
East -H- Street from Eastlake Drive to SR-125.
San Higue'l Road from Bonita Road to SR-125.
12. Central Avenue from Bonita Road to Corral
Canyon Road.
13. Bonita Road from Otay Lakes Road to Sweetwater
Road.
14. Sweetwater Road from Bonita Road to State
Route 54.
15. Certain reconstruction and traffic management
systems within fee boundaries necessary to
ensure safe and efficient operations of the
traffic system.
Traffic signals on East -H- Street at the
entrance of Southwestern ColleQe.
(
.li.
"-
'-
-2-
IO-V
.. .
0'
Lt
( .~
(.
. ~
to read:
'-
0'
(b) The City Council may modify or amend the list of
projects in order to maintain compliance with the
Circulation Element of the City's General Plan.
SECTION II: Section 4 of Ordinance No. 2251 is amended
SECTION 4: Developer Construction of Transportation
Facilities. '
(a) Whenever a developer of a development project would
be required by application of City law or policy,
as a condition of approval of a development permit
to construct or finance the construction of a
portion of a transportation facility identified in
Section 3 of this ordinance, the City Council may
impose an additional requirement that the developer
install the improvements with supplemental size,
length or capacity in order to ensure efficient and
timely construction of the transportation
facilities network. If such a requirement is
imposed, the City Council shall, in its discretion,
enter into a reimbursement agreement with the
developer, or give a credit against the fee
otherwise levied by this ordinance on the
development project, or some combination thereof.
(b)
A developer may request authorization from the City
Council td construct one or more of the facilities
listed in Section 3. 't1Ik//fer4.'J.eit//$'rfttVV/MI/tI~de
fri/~/t~/~/tftr/~/trid/~/t~rit~lri
tXe/t~ll~wfiS/lit~t~~tl~itl/t~riiltl~rii'
)
~:. Whenever a developer requests reimbu'rsement, or a
,'credit against fees, for work done or paid by the
developer under Subsections (a) or (b) of thiR
section, the request shall be submitted in writinq
,to the City Council before commencement of the~
work. The request shall contain the following
information and, if granted, shall be subject to
the following conditions:
1. Detailed description af the project with a
preliminary cost estimate. That portion of
the proiect which involves the specified
improvements authorized by Section 3 of
Ordinance No. 2251 is referred to herein as
the Transportation Facility Project.
2. Requirements of developer:
-3-
II) -1
. ,
li
(
.h
!.:.
(
preparation of plans and specifications for
approval by the City; ;
secure and dedicate any right-of-way
required for the project;
secure all required permits, environmen~al
clearances necessary for construction of
the project;
provision of performance bonds (where the
developer intends to utilize provisions for
immediate credi t, the performance bond
shall be for 100 percent of the value of
the project);
payment of all City fees and costs.
3. The City will not be responsible for any of
the costs of constructing the project. The
developer shall advance all necessary funds to
construct ~he project.
4.
The developer shall secure at least three (3)
qualified bids for work to be done." The
construction contract shall be granted to the
lowest qualified bidder. If qualified, the
developer may aqree to Derform the work at a
price equal to or less than the low bid. Any
claims for additional payment for extra work
or charges during construction shall be
justified and shall be documented to the
satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
The develo er shall rovide a de'tailed cost
estimate whIch itemIzes those costs 0 the
construction attributable to the
Transportation Facility Pro;ect and excludes
any work attributable to a sDecific
subdivision pro;ect." The estimate "is
preliminary and sub;ect to final determination
by the Director of PUblic Works upon
completion of the Transportation Facility
Project.
Upon approval of the estimated cost by the
Director of PUblic Works, the developer shall
be entitled to immediate credit for 75 percent
of the estimated cost of the construction
attributable to the Transportation Facilitv
Project. The immediate credits shall be
applied to the developers" obligation to pay
fees for bUildinq permits issued after the
establishment of the credit. The developer
. .
-4-
/0-10
1(
t
J..:..
C
r
- .
C,'"
'PI
(
,
(
L.
.h
h
shall specify these bUildinq permits
the credit is to be applied at the
developer submi ts the bui ldinq
applications.
to which
time the
permit
If the develo er uses all of the 75 ercent
immediate cred1t before f1nal complet1on 0
the Transportation Facili ty Proiect, then the
developer may defer payment of Development
Impact Fees for other buildinq permits by
providinq to the City liquid security such as
cash or an irrevocable letter of credit, but
not bonds or set-aside letters, in an amount
equal to the remaininq 25 percent of the
estimllted cost of the Transportation Facility
Project.
When all work has been completed to the
satisfaction of the City, the developer shall
submit verification of payments made for the
construction of the project' to the City.. The
Director of Public Works shall make the final
determination on expenditures which are
eligible for credit or cash reimbursement.
After final determination of eliqible
expenditures has been made by the Puhlic Works
Director, the final amount of Development
Impact Fee credi ts shall be determined. The
developer shall receive credit aqainst the
deferred fee obliqation in an amount equal to
the difference between the final expenditure
determination and the amount of the 75 percent
immediate credit used if any. The amount of
the deferred fee oblioations shall be based
upon the fee fee schedule in effect at the
time of the final credit determination. The
Director of Public Works shall convert the
credit to an EDU basis. for residential
development and/or a Gross Acre basis for
commercial or industrial development. The
City shall notify the developer of the final
deferred fee obliqation, and of the amount of
the applicable credit. If the amount of the
applicable credit is less than the deferrec'l
fee obliqation, then the developer shall have
thirty (30) days to pay the deferred fee. If
the deferred fees are not paid within the
thirtY-day period, the City may mllke a demanc'l
aqainst the liquid security and apply the
proceeds to the fee obliqation.
-s-
It; -II
. .
.,.
c
f,' 10. The developer will receive if ill credit
against required Development Impact Fees
incrementally at the time'building permits are
issued for the developers' project.
t
If the total construction cost amounts to more
than the total Development Impact Fees which
will be required for the developer's
~f~peft'l project, then the amount in excess
of Development Impact Fees will be paid in
cash when funds are available as determined by
the City Manager, ~f a reimbursement
agreement will be executed: or the developer
may waive reimbursement and use the excess as
credi t aqainst future Development Impact Fee
obligations.
SECTION II I:
amended to read:
Section 7 of Ordinance No.
2251 is
SECTION 7: Assessment Districts.
(
If any assessment or special taxing district is
established for any or all of the facilities listed in
Section 3, the owner or developer of a project may apply
to the City Council for a ~redit against the fee in an
amount equal to the developments attributable portion of
the 4$$~$$~~d~/~/fA~/PAI. cost of the authori?ed
ImProvements as determined by the Director of Public
Works, plus incidental costs normally occurrinq with a
construction project, but excludinq costs associated
with assessment district proceedinqs or financing.
SECTION IV: Time Limit for Judicial Action.
r
'-
Any judicial action or proceeding to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul this ordinance shall be brought
within the time period as established by Government Code
Section 54995 after the effective date of this ordinance.
SECTION V: Effective Date.
This ordinance shall become effective thirty (30) days
after its second reading and adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/Ai) \ '/,/
'<it /Z17/Uv.J;.fh././:r.'.-!
T~9mas J.~~ron, City Attorney
- (/
../
-
C
(
3688a
-6-
/0"/2,
.d ~_~~ ___~~
,.l
. ,
"
l
..
FIRST READ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA~ CAlIFORNIA~ HELD January 10 , 19 ~, AND
FINAllY PASSED AND ADOPTED AT-A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD January 17
19 89 . BY THE FOllOWING VOTE, TO-WIT:
AYES: Councilmen: Moore, McCand11ss, Nader, Cox, Malcolm
NAYES: Councilmen: None
ABSTAIN: CoLn:ilmen : None
ABSENT: Councilmen: None
ATTEST.
~ I..~
Me the City of Chula Vista
~~,~4"'#~
tf" City Clerk
( .'
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
)
) 55.,: '
)
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing Is a full, true and correct copy of
2289
ORDINANCE NO,
,and that the some has not been amended or repealed.
DATED
(:
City Clerk
!b-13
(
.' ~
""
"
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ,'.
.
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments; or campaign contn'butions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commlssi.~n, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: ',.,'
+
, '
1. L13t the names of all persons having a financial interest In the contract, ;i.c., contractor,
subcontructor, material suppUer.
The Baldwin Companv
FN Projects, Inc.
2. I( any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, lisqbe names of all
Individuals owning more than 10% of the shares In the corporation or owning atly partnership
interest in the partnership. . :: .
"
...
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above Is non-profit organization or a tru~~;Ust the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or' beneficiary or
tf \Jstor of tho trust. . : ~
.,'
..
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member or the City staff,
Board~ Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? .Yes_
No 2... If yes, please indicate person(s): . .
. .
. .
~
~.
Please ide.ntify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultant~ or independent
contr~c~ors who, vou have asJ~ed to represent you before , the ("Itv in this ma.!!!'.!'; & As oc
Munlclpal Fl'hance..,.."7. .>>'''' Meade f Davl~ Kel"tIiM.'. -K!!"l1:;l\er s.
tollo:>vu !1I~11lC''C'.L.;'.~..~ - .vlc:un:: .:!Uau~hnessey tIe...: Brenn Bre-.:R, ~~aF1i;:'9~. i1.arRS
"cI~ti~~ Gr6~p Pa~l Gaff f uO"to~h~o
TR":" D!:Io1.4n.f... C'Qmr=:ll....~. C'li11ug~, "'''''oisi, El';'7=:11hot-h '.....n'J C:::"o..,o. n""'l,lo
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, In the aggregate, contn'buted more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember In the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ~ ICyes, state which
Councilmember(s);
Person Is defined as: 'Any individual, fIrn~ co.partnership,joint venture, association, social club,fraternal organization, corporalion,
tstnle, rrus~ receiver, syndicate, this and /lny other county. city and caunrry, ctty, municipality, d/strli;t or ather palitlcal subdivisian,
or /lny other group or cambinatian acting lIS " unit.'
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as n=my)
9/20/91
Date:
(J/-L n~,
Signature of contractor/applicant
Claudia Troisi / The Baldwi~ Company
-. ., -~.. ~.~---
Jl?-/'L_
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Rcviaed: 111301901
f....-II~WDISCl..OSE. TXT1
___)>.~l~:~_~1f---- .
--:~--".-"'''''''-'''''''~-'''''''-~'~-~.-- ,~-.,
, -
_____ SEP-24-'91 TUE 139:49 ID:CJTY OF CHULFI UISTFI TEL NO:FFlX 619 691 5171
1:1418 PeJ2
MEMORANDUM
September 23, 1991
Pile No. HX'()15
To: Counc1'1maniJerry.RindQnio .....
Subject:
10hn Goss, City Manqer '1"'1(,
~."
10hn Lippitt, Director of Public Worb ~
Questions Raised Resarding September 24 Council Agenda
Via:
Prom:
Item 'I Eutlake MalDtenan('e District - Salt Creek Area
Since thue mal1W71Q1ICe distria Q8SeJS1M1'ItS GTe Q/)oVf tM 21 limit for property tax and
O.!StSSlMfIU bttng propostd for tM district, whlll stqJS I!/lSUI't thlll tM 1M ~ buytrs art
QWQN of 1M QMUQ] QSSUSlfUfIU?
As in all of our subdivisions, we require the developer to disclose all applicable costs of
purchasing the home. This disclosure includes the annual charges for the Uleument districts,
all Mello-Roos districts and all open space maintenance district costs. Throup this disclosure
statement the buyer is aware of all costs they will be incurring in the purchase of their homes.
Attached is a copy of the disclosure statement for Salt Crec:k I from the Baldwin Company,
Item 101 GradIDi of D-125
Baldwin Is Ttcetving crtdtt up to 7"% oftM approved cost utimatel. Why not 100%1
Under the Development Impact Pee ordinance the developer originally did not rece1ve any credit
until the project was complete and staff was able to certify the expenditurea. That wu later
amended to allow the developers to receive partial credit at ",. of the estimated colt once the
dcvc10per has posted all the necessary completion and materlal/1abor bonds with the City and
awarded the contract. This was done becaU18 the developers were laying out large amounts of
cash for the construction, but still having to pay fees pending completion of the project. This
waa, in effect, requiring double financing of the improvements. The amendment to allow partial
credit alleviated this problem. However, since credit was being given based IOlely on estimates,
the amendment to the DIP ordinance included immediate credit based on only 75,. of the
estimated cost. Full credit on all of the eli&ible expenditures will be given to the developer in
ac<:ordance with the DIP ordinance once staff has been able to certify the expenditures.
CU, (A:\SBPT24.MMO)
eel Assistant City Manager
Deputy City Managers
Mayor/City Council
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item--1.L
Meeting Date 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE:
Report on additional stop sign at the intersection of Country
Vistas Lane and Crestview Dri~e/in Bonita Long Canyon
Director of Public Works~~
City Manager ~~G (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No...x.J
-r ,f Council Referral #2356. 2420
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
Staff received two letters and petition from Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker
request i ng that a stop sign be i nsta 11 ed for the southbound approach at the
intersection of Country Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council deny the request for a southbound
stop sign at the intersection of Country Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission, at their meeting
of August 8, 1991, voted 4-1 to deny the request for an all-way stop at the
intersection of Country Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive.
DISCUSSION:
Staff has recei ved 1 etters from Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker request i ng that a
stop sign be installed for the southbound approach only at the intersection of
Country Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive. They expressed a need for this stop
sign to facilitate the crossing at the intersection. They stated it is
difficult to see southbound oncoming vehicles on Country Vistas Lane due to a
crest in the road.
Country Vi stas Lane is a north/south curvil i near res i dent i a 1 collector
street. The curb to curb di stance is 40 feet for the south 1 eg and 36 feet
for the north leg of the intersection. The centerline grade is 11.5 percent
downhill south of this intersection. There is also a horizontal curve in this
area with a design speed of 30 miles per hour. The speed 1 imit is a prima
facie 25 miles per hour. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is 1,046 vehicles
per day.
Crestview Drive is an east/west residential street with a curb to curb width
of 36 feet. The west leg of the intersection is a cul-de-sac which leads to
Rimcrest Drive. It is this approach in the eastbound direction which has the
reduced visibil ity at Country Vistas Lane. The embankment located at the
northwest corner of the intersection at 1532 Country Vi stas Lane reduces the
visibility of southbound vehicles.
Staff has completed a sight distance visibility check at this intersection and
has determined that while the west leg has less visibil ity than the others,
the sight distance is adequate. The driveway at 1532 Country Vistas Lane is
\ \ ..I
Page 2, Item~
Meeting Date 9/24/91
located approximately 125 feet north of the centerl ine of Crestview Drive.
The attached area plat shows area driveways and the embankment. The base of
the embankment is approximately 10 feet to 12 feet behind the face of curb.
In the letters addressed to the City Council, the request as made by Dr. and
Mrs. Baker is for the addition of one stop sign for southbound Country Vistas
Lane. Presently, only both approaches of Crestview Drive are controlled by
stop signs. The installation of stop signs on three of four approaches to an
intersection is not a recommended practice. Therefore, staff could only
evaluate the subject location as an all-way stop candidate for the possible
addition of two stop signs.
Staff does not recommend havi ng three of four approaches at an intersection
controlled by stop signs because this may lead to false expectations for
motori sts stopped and pedestri ans attempt i ng to cross the street in thi nki ng
that all approaches are controlled by a stop sign. Results of the all-way
stop study show that the intersection did not meet any warrants to justify the
installation of an all-way stop. Although this area is relatively new, staff
has no record of any reported accidents at this intersection.
Speed survey results 1 i sted below show that the average speed for southbound
traffic is approximately 29 miles per hour. Most vehicles (95%) are traveling
between 23 and 33 miles per hour.
Countrv Vistas Lane
Southbound Vehicles Northbound Vehicles
Date 7/17/91 7 /18/91 7/17/91 7/18/91
Avg. Speed 27.41 27.79 29.22 28.04
Median Speed 26.18 27.24 27.06 26.34
85th % Speed 31. 40 31.44 35.62 32.84
Mode Speed 23 23 23 23
10 MPH Pace 23-33 23-33 23.33 23.33
10 MPH Pace % 94.50 95.32 83.20 90.52
ADT 262 422 765 642
Staff will relocate the stop limit line 10 feet closer to the intersection so
that visibility of southbound vehicles can be maximized. The area plat shows
the new location of the stop limit line. Slides are available for viewing.
FISCAL IMPACT: $100 for marking change.
WPC 5717E
FR/mad: KY -119
Attachments: All-way stop study
Area plats
Letter and petition
Safety Commission minutes 8/8/91
\\..2
(
(
(
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
c.ov"f/j \/'5+"'5 L~ /
INTERSECTION Cr<!"s+v,'e.w Dr,' tilL-
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: M. 7/;;1.1/9 I
.
Total Points /0
(/6'1 -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicl e del ay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
a ll-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersect i on of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
S. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
o
(2f
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop:
Maximum 14 points No r~l'o~cl ","cc..iJ......+.s SCORE:
Points
2.
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
.
\\"'3
-
(
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the City Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 3D-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 3D-point minimum requirement mil be waived and an all-way stop mil be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops mil be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
if
Points
SCORE:
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
( 4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four hi~hest hour volumes): . . ft- ;;.-t:;",,~
Hour Ending At: 7;..# v~ ill~ ~
0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100~1300 1400~1800 1900 2000
0\ ::: \ 'If' '~ '-IS 1./ I 7' ~;. /;.. '/S 31./ "1ft 33 53 :~
o t ~ R ;;,!, 3l- J5 ~ .2:J. ..1l ~ .;L 7 ~...!:LL ~-
-;- ?S- SCf 35' '-13 '-13 53 '13 5(), 7~ b' 1./1 37 '18 ~
o Y 7 5 /4 il8 5~ .;1'- 31 35" 1'1 1/ 4 3
~ b ..n 3;;>. ~.:B2 .:lli. ~ ~ ..n..!:ll ~.@... .12.. ~
;l. -;- 1"1 -:;::0 18 .;2;;1. '11 4;;".;!(, 3'-/ 38 ,;;.1 IS <:f 8
e I I}" 13 I ~ 1(;, 4 B " b " a.4 10 Cf 6
I 0 ~ (0 ~ IS- ILl IS- cr ICJ /0 ~~.!E- J80
- - - -- --;;- -/.. J;; 13 B Olb <=t /0
I I 9 /0 9 Ih I ....
(0 ~3 1'3 1S'.;2.3;;1.3' 7 13 1'1 #-d.. 8 lor,?, 3 OJ.' I J1
:3 ;;S 13 ~'3 /b ,;2S".2&'/ ~;;1. .;10 .J"L I'" ~ J2 .rL ~
'5 ~L.j 13 19;;;0 ~ ;) iB;; 1"1 /L.I 0l-3 /8 ;;'0 IS-
Cj 53 /00 8'-/ 90 /05' IJ,Lj /15 /08 /l..1(}. I&.-I II'} 7q 87 5Cf
\\..,,\ ~- CD G:> Ii)
Dir
N8
AV&.
SB
A1/6.
EB
AI/G.
WB
(
T
,
Volumes: I-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: ~ 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points SCORE:
I
Points
~
E HOt/a): /;1-00
EIVTJ/N ...
A--r I;;>' 'I
Traffic Volumes Warrant .
IrOQ IbOD /)00
l'fa- lal ""1
=- ~o '" a.i..R ~J..Li> I
(
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of COVAlTfl.Y V/>T.AS L~ Total of C fZ~sTVI6/N 1;:>e!VE::
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000- '373 cp o - 400 - 133 cD
1001 - 1300 401 - 600 1
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 4 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: o Points SCORE: o Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
( accordance wi th the fo 11 owi ng table:
/'6"1- 3iO = .,9024-Hour Minor St. ADDroach Volumes '1"/0 )(100"> -=- LIb-B./:.
~JJt./"'lO'fb24-Hour Maior St. ADDroach Volumes X 100%./0'160 /... Points
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 'Ib_8% cb
45 - 54
35 - 44 4
25 - 34 3
15 - 24 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: S Points
Maximum 10 Points
/;;>.0'-" ,.QC:> 160 C> /700
AJf.?, 5"3 7(, €:( /.fer
JJv~y ..::il.. ~ 3d- ~f
vls.,A!; :>8
LANe:: 11{ I I 0 ,"I 70
(
Et3 Cf
c..: .- fVl6t.; /3 'i) .;1.(,
~11f~ W,3 ,;2../ 1'1 ..!:L ,;1.3
-
3<.> 3 a.. ..;j..;l. "If
-
-
\\..S -3-
- 373
- (33
(
(
(
CALTRANS CRITERIA (Chanter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a
hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
When the as-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
(b)
(c)
c~/ V~.4 L~
~~ ~~;F :
~ ~C~~--'L
D M"rE oN -/)17 -T' 1/ iI! - " /"
AV6. S'pEcb d;l7./f I c}"7.7'1
l1.,r:J/AN SP~E;() .;1.",.18 en. ~Y
estJ 7.. sPa/) 3 f.L1 0 3/. 1./1.{
M"P[ snEb.;2.3 .;<3
!OMPi-/P",,<..f. .;l3-33 .;13-33
/OMfl-l PAa % '1./. $"0 'is. 3~
C-.._.-I.V~L~ ~7~])~ I F7/1't
~~~~ 1./.. D/fr~ vJ ,117- Tt, 118-
<JC'~'~ Vr' Av6. .sPl:ED .:z9.dd ~8.o4
ME!>IAA/sfEEl> ;;J.7.o6 ~(;,.31f
8St~ 7.. SPEE!I 35.G(}.. 3~. ~If
MO~ .sPf;E.\) 01'3 ~3
/OMPH PAcE" ~3-33 .;1.3-33
/0 MPH PI\CE % 83.Qlo '1().~'?"
.
-4-
\\-~
-
,
(
(
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Intersection ~t~'5tqS l_R~..rL/Ge.5+V;€w Dr"v'~
(Major) I (Mi nor)
File /bi/-GO
Date-L!:} "7 I 'Z-'7 Ie; I
Invest igator Fx R...
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No x:: Poi nts
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
No X
Yes
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached~- f7..fl- -~
I. Accident History Points Possible
From I / , /8'if to b /.;2Q i 1 (
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident ;tI~~
14
2.
....", C"J~ ~~-d
~ 153 C"'~ -....d L~
tj
10
3.
Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians 1€.5s -J-hel-yo 50
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
I
5
4.
Traffic Volu.es (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches "3 7 3
Minor approaches 1.3 3
Traffic Volume Difference ~,.~~
fb
P'
S-
5
10
10
5.
TOTAL
Mini.u. Points Required
10
54
30
WPC: 5546E
\\-1 -6-
-
.
.
.
,
1 1 '7 ' ~~
- ~ ~
~I ~ >-~
~ 'I~ .- ~
~ j !l?3- y ~ ~ ""/~
_ ~ ..... ~. t~ r ~r;7'-
r ~, ~ ~ '\ ,~ ~~~
- t/}---, ". j , ... ....., ~.J""" -
~ ~ -" -, \ ,....."- r7\
,/ ~ -.... e]:. ....... - ~ _,/{,,- ~
'\ / '-1,.....-, \... ~1 _'s~-BJ~C/7T~R~Etj; _
r-. ~ ~ ~1l1' ~ ~il
( ~~~- ~V~ -~
-.... .,., '\71 ~ ~ ~
I~ ~>.... 7 ""
"~~' ~~ -"~ .J"k/
........1 .............. T1"
. ~ -..... ~ "J .
~ ~ - ~~ '\ '
........- q; ~ ~
~ . ).,.,~.., ~I
"L~' ~~I.'
-"~~'~'.'_~','A.RE.,.A.. .p_ ~_AT . ..
-." ----~~..M,_____ __
.
',\\..g .
'I ~TY ~ A I GO
CIT):. ,_'\ ~ HULA
l ~
~~ ~
1:
VISTA
r" -"/ ~~ i
1~
..
(
.
.
...
.~
I...J
{
I)
---
~
./
1I
~I
...
.-'-'
~
DIIAWN IT
'(
.
. DUE 7110/81 .
-
---
--
.
-
- -... ..-
-
- '
~
7.,.,
MARKINGS
Traffic Manual
Figure 8-20
TYPICAL INTERSECTION MARKINGS
(
2-LANE
LEGEND
... DlrKtlon of Trllval
(
,
\\ ...'\
4" 1r .
.
R1
1toSe<<le
MUL nLANE
NOTES:
1. Tha limit line on wide eIcIe I08Il. or long rIIdlu.
coma,. may be bent .. a 450 :t angle for traffic
_king a right turn.
2. 8aa Flgurll H for lmerwc:tlon trutmant on the
through highway.
3. The limit Ilna ahoulcl be located to Indicate tha
point at which traffic Ie Mqulracl to atop (eVe 3771.
4. A limit line ahall be placad on paved approacha. to
State Hlghway& and a STOP _rldng ahould be
placad on all but minor approacha..
5. If STOP AHEAD (W17A) algn Ie uaacl, pavement
lagand. may be placad adjacent to the algn accord-
Ing to aac:tIon &02.14.
~
(
-~-- "
;ir~~~
lUll I A
l (;lit COjl,:ll eft ICES
CH",: \~,~. CA
Dr. end Mrs. Robert Baker
1481 IIMeREST tlURT
IONITR, CRLlFI.NII 9"82
June 10, 1991
City Council
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Dear Council Members:
-
'.'
We, the undersigned, along with members of our neighborhood, submit to
you this petition to have a stop sign installed on Country Vistas Drive
at the intersection of Country Vistas Drive and Crestview Drive, in
Bonitll Long Cllnyon. (Nt>RThU'" U>1',"~R.)
(
.'
Trying to cross Country Vistas Drive, whether on foot or In'a'car, Is
difficult. One cllnnot see vehicles coming from Country Vistas Drive as
there is a crest in the road which impairs a clear view.
Thank you for your consideration and attention to this matter.
-\--:,
\ ':..
A~D~
/4rS'/ y;Z.'i ;;./.:i- 6?;,.z~ 4-.v_-6., c; .
:2' -- '7Jf{i
1'177 ....".:-.-(,;.._, i {.~.:Z.,/~-,.- c;.
1::! {p 0 ~ I ~ 1..1 ' 't;. .',.
(1'v\.(1 Ji i' /i"" \..) "'"... '-)' ~t~ ,
~~~~'
;~ 2- <l0...~~ Ci '
I;
~
.
32/,. C'hI%fl.()lhJtJ
,~? ~d"":" -.u:~, dz.
7ft)
(r~~//1~c../
g..
. UIJ
-'
3)..1' cLc>rcIlC-v PIl, /?~
.1' __
,.,
;1
.
..
. \\...\1..
. .
.
--- -- -- ---- ~. ..__._--....----~.._----
~
l
Dr-. and Mr-s. Rober-t Baker-
1481 IIMCREST C.IRT
BONITA, CRLlF..NII 91 '12
r~- --7; ~ -
I r' J t9 I~ I' \
,I.) r l, ,
n f J
J' i AUG I 6 /991 ~~.' ,
CITY (.vLJi":CIt O!:Ti'~"ES ~
CHUlA ViSTA: cl
August 10, 1991
The Honorable Tim Nader, Mayor of Chula Vista
The City Council of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chulll Vistll CA 91902
Dear Sirs,
(
We are writing to you conceming our request for a stop sign at the north
comer of Crestview and Country Vistas, in Bonita Long Canyon. We had
previously appeared at a Public Safety meeting on 6/6/91 to present our
request. We feel that the committee misunderstood our request and the
rellsons behind it IInd therefore denied our request. We are IIppellling to
you.
To briefly summarize, this comer has an obstructed view due to a hi11
that crests just to the north of the intersection. When a car is
attempting to tum down the hi11 or cross directly through Country Vistas
it is nearly impossible to tell if there is oncoming traffic. The city
engineer referred to Country Vistas as a cul-de-sac. While it is true
that there is no outlet, Country Vistas is a very long street ( longer than
a mile), Crestview Is a feeder from Corral Canyon, and there Is a high
volume of constructIon traffic with both large and small trucks passing
through to the McMi11an homes sti11 being built. These homes are selling
well and more and more people are moving in.
As we hope that you can see from the enclosed diagram, Crestview
intersects a steep hill. The crest is just to our left when we tum into
Country Vistlls from our street. The traffic builds up grellt momentum
as It starts down the hl11 and frankly, the sItuation Is dangerous.
(
We feel that the committee gave consideration only to the city
engineer's report and not enough to evolving conditions in Long Canyon.
We also asked only for a single stop sign (not a 4-way) on the north
\ \... \:3
I
,
.:";.
iQ .....,::1
Ie z..(
c;>
-0
~. Z"'f\:J.
G"') pt f'1
_, 1"100
.- ":IJ::t t"
-- .-c-;
Zr~
~ C'r>o
- ~~
..... -0(1)
o -I~
U> ):>
<--
(
(
.
-
comer sInce that Is the only one where vIsibility Is an Issue (although
we are told that for obscure reasons a 4 way Is easier to obtain than a
single or a three-way). We invite you to come out and see for yourself
if our concerns are valid. We certainly realize that there are already
many stop signs on the local streets and no one wants more than we do
to drive unimpeded. Nonetheless we feel that this situation is
dangerous. We are concerned about the many small children in our area
who may not be nimble enough to dodge the oncoming vehicles when they
try to cross what appears to be an empty street. Surely we do not need
to walt for a trage(]y to unfold.
Sincerely yours 21
~k~~~l;f--P0~v
S~ia and Ro~~r.)
rJ
-.
('0
c"
Countrw Vistas
r+
<:
('0
=E
pl~~ p-t+"'-
s ~f ~'G" ~\
......./
- I
---.,~'
obstructed view'
Country Vi st:JS
Rin1Cre~:t
\\, ,~\
?
:
.
j
SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES
Thursday, August 8,1991
7:05 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
1. ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Co-Chair Thomas, Commissioners Chidester, Koester, Matacia,
Padilla
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Braden, Commissioner Pitts
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Motion by Koester to approve Safety Commission Minutes of July 11, 1991. Second by
Matacia. MSUC 5-0. .
3. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None.
4. WRITI'EN CORRESPONDENCE: Moved to Commission Comments by Co-Chair
Thomas.
5. REQUEST FOR AN ALL-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY
VISTAS LANE AND CRESTVIEW DRIVE
Staff received a letter and petition from Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker requesting that an all-
way stop be installed at the intersection of County Vistas Lane and Crestview Drive in
Bonita Long Canyon. Staff evaluated the intersection using the all-way stop policy recently
approved by City Council. When this intersection was measured against this criteria, it did
not meet any of the justification warrants for an all-way stop. The intersection received 10
points out of a possible 54 with the minimum to justify an all-way stop being 30 points nor
did it meet one of the warrants, i.e. accidents, unusual conditions, pedestrian volumes,
traffic volume, or the traffic volume difference. Staff indicated that there have been no
reported accidents at this location. When vehicles are on Crestview Drive looking left for
oncoming vehicles southbound on County Vistas Lane, the embankment reduces the sight
visibility. An evaluation of the sight distance shows that the sight distance is adequate for
the design speed (25mph). Staff is recommending that the limit line be relocated closer to
the intersection so that the motorist can gain addition visibility for oncoming vehicles. Staff
recommended that the request for an all-way stop be denied.
Mr. Roben Baker, 1481 Rimcrest Coun, Bonita, CA 91902
Mr. Baker felt his request was misinterpreted by the Traffic division.. He was not asking
all-way stop, but for one stop sign placed at the north corner of Country Vistas Lane. To
the north there is a steep hill rise. Construction trucks are moving quickly up and down the
hills and there have been numerous near-accidents. The trucks crest the hill at a high rate
of speed and numerous citations have been given out to speeders.
.
\\...\s
I
,
,I
August 8, 1991 Minutes
Page 2
Mr. Matacia asked if the development in the area about finished. Mr. Baker stated that
Crestview is almost complete. However, the development north of Crestview is actively
under construction. Mr. Baker stated that the problem is more difficult in the day because
a driver cannot see if a vehicle is preparing the crest the hill whereas at night, headlights
of oncoming cars are visible.
Mr. Thomas asked if placing a stop sign only on the north comer would change staff's
recommendation. Mr. Rivera replied that the City does not have any intersection where stop
signs are at three of the four comers. It would not be recommended.
Commissioner Chidester asked if there would be any practicality in reducing the speed limit
for the area. Mr. Rivera stated that an intersection warning sign with an advisory speed
could be installed at the approach to Crestview Drive on County Vistas Lane. This would
not be an enforceable speed limit, but advisory only.
Mr. Koester moved that the Safety Commissions recommend to the City Council to deny
the request for an all-way stop at the intersection of Country Vistas Lane and Crestview
Drive. Second Thomas. MSC 4-1 (Chidester opposed).
Co-Chair Thomas informed Mr. Baker that he could appeal this decision to the City
Council. Frank Rivera stated that this item will be going back to Council and that residents
would be notified of the date and time. Since the Safety Commission is an advisory group
only, their recommendation will be on the City Council report. No action will be taken by
staff until after the City Council meeting.
6. REQUEST FOR AN ALL-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF BUENA VISTA
WAY AND CALLE SANTIAGO.
Staff received a request from Mrs. Cueva requesting that an all-way stop be installed at the
intersection of Buena Vista Way and Calle Santiago. The majority of traffic approaching
the intersection on Calle Santiago makes left turns to East "H" Street. On westbound Buena
Vista Way, most of the traffic turns right to East "H" Street. This intersection has no
reported accidents; The all-way stop study indicated that this intersection did not meet any
of the justification warrants. Staff is recommending against this request for an all-way stop
due to the good safety record of the intersection.
.
Mr. Padilla asked if the park south of the Calle Santiago/Buena Vista intersection had access
from the roadway. Mr. Rivera there is an asphalt pathway used probably for maintenance
but could be used for pedestrian traffic.
.
Mrs. Yolanda Cueva, 867 Cry6lal Coun, Chula VISta, CA 91910
Mrs. Cueva said her request is derived from personal experience with this intersection.
During the past school year, she escorted her daughter to school and crossed Buena Vista
Way and used the park to access the school. She feels an all-way stop and crosswalks are
\\,l(,
r-
~~->< 1;0
E~,- ;
~ EL Tcr...~. p,j(. TEL t\jl] .1~1 ~,3'~j'~1I=11=11=,~
'~,ep ~4.91 16:~3 t~C.- 1
o
i
EXECUTiVE OFFiCE
~;..€li~€..~.~....I4r, (..\'0 ...~, '{;.. _
SANTA. MO~"ICA. C:ALlFORNIA 9(.14 < ..-0":'
I".;O~H. (2~', ~'~6-4~14
F.Io.X 1(1:\, 399.Q()f.?
September 24, 1991
Yl.f\.r~~.l.t.)!!
City Clerk
City 0: "hula Vista
276 FO\JJ lh Avenue
C~'lld ~sta. CA 92010
L'r. .
"L.
CourH.:il 1~<;wLAddressJ.n(r PH' Fee_<;redit tor
Right of~ Dedication SE.Q...QtgY~f> Roa>!
and East "HIO Street
Dea~ \'Ic'l<y:
In aCI;crdanc8 w'lt:h this afternoon's te1ephone conversati()r.
we res.,f,,'U; Illy lequest that the abo','e-referenced item !>t'
continued until October 8. 1991. In that ~onver~atinn, J
j ndici:\ted t.O us that Publ,ic Io.UI i,$ .:as agrel'ilble tJ) such ;,
continuance. We were unable tu confirr.', wit.h the l'11blic
Works De~~rtment ~hat they wuul~ be reaiy to present thtH
l'er,l ?I,d as sUI-h. our first not:ce \ons (>ur' reC':eipt of
::',--,1!'" Keport. in thlS morr.lng's ffidl!. {O'Jl' conside,,,ti')'.
'.': t'115 request ....ould be great ly dppr.'cia+ed.
StnCerely,
KELTON TITLE C~PORATl(3.
/-/
. JL.-:- / /
B /'~ / / /;1,
Y : L..f--, C' ~.~. ,::~:<..:.::..-
Mctrk KE;J t.on
MKI f'u
cc: Je,hn Lipl'et
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /2-
Meeting Date 9/24/91
ITEM TITLE:
Report on granting Development Impact Project Fee (DIF) credit
for right-of-way dedication, Kelton Project, Southeast corner
of Otay Lakes Road and East H Street
Director of pu~c Work~ ~
City Manager~ f(" (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..xJ
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At the August 27, 1991 meeting, Council directed staff to prepare a report
relative to the applicant's request for DIF credit for right-of-way dedication
which was a condition of their development. Staff was instructed to consider
what had been required on past projects and was directed to include a
discussion of impacts which might result from granting DIF credit for
right-of-way dedication.
RECOMMENDATION: Require full dedication with no DIF credit given for said
dedication.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
At the Council meeting of August 27,1991, Council considered a General Plan
Amendment and Rezone of the parcel located at the corner of Otay Lakes Road
and East H Street. The applicant, Kelton Title Corporation, requested credit
towards DIF fees for street dedication. This project is on the corner of two
streets designated as Prime Arterials. The Negative Declaration IS-90-13
listed as mitigation for increased traffic generated by this project the
dedication requirements on Otay Lakes Road and East H Street.
Initial requirements by the staff were to not only dedicate the right-of-way,
but to also widen the street. Since it may be several years until the
widening was actually needed, and there is no current DIF project to widen
this area, staff did not recommend requiring improvements at this time but did
require the right-of-way to accommodate future widening.
Currently, neither section of roadway adjacent to this project is included in
the DIF program as an eligible project. As indicated in the Negative
Declaration, the City will be including the construction of these projects in
the next DIF update. Any other changes which might result from consideration
of this report will also be included.
The transportat i on DI F program was started with the EastLake development and
expanded to include most of the land east of 1-805. The-program has included
major streets and interim SR-125 as projects that would be funded through
payment of fees or construction of the facilities in-lieu thereof. To date,
most of the projects have been constructed by the major developers with
credits being granted towards future building permits for work constructed
with a value in excess of the DIF required for the project necessitating the
improvements.
J'--I
Page 2, Item I~
Meeting Date 9/24/91
All development projects in the eastern area are required to pay the DIF which
is based upon traffic generation. Those developers who build DIF streets, are
given dollar for dollar credit for their improvement costs with the exception
of: 1) right-of-way dedication; and 2) financing costs.
The DIF program has only included the cost of right-of-way for locations where
the right-of-way was offsite of the development and the City had no other
means to obtain the right-of-way from the other property owner, or, in the
case of SR-125, where right-of-way exceeds 121 feet in width. Dedication of
right-of-way adjacent to a development project was considered as a requirement
of the development.
Council directed staff to prepare this
done in the past and indicate what the
giving DIF credit for the dedications.
this report along with alternatives.
report and di scuss what the Ci ty has
consequences might be as a result of
Each will be discussed in the body of
KELTON PARCEL HISTORY
Thi s 3.65 acre parcel is the 1 ast parcel to be developed out of a 435 acre
project originally known as Otay Greens developed by this appl icant. This
development i ncl uded all eight units of Southwestern Coll ege Estates.
Consequently, street dedications for each of the projects was required to
provide adequate access to the developments.
The development of Bonita Long Canyon and EastLake requi red the construct i on
of the south half of East H Street from Otay Lakes Road approximately 600 feet
east. This street frontage along East H Street was improved by EastLake
Development Company/McMill in Communit i es as a joi nt project associ ated wi th
Bonita Long Canyon Unit 1 and EastLake Unit 1. The right-of-way was dedicated
to the City as an offsite requirement of those projects. The right-of-way was
granted by this developer in exchange for installation of the street
improvements associated with that dedication. In addition, EastLake/McMillin
deposited $5,000 with the City which was paid to this developer for part of
this right-of-way. That dedication amounted to 1.58 acres of land off of this
parcel.
Current dedication requirements for the proposed project amounts to 0.485
acres (21,126 SF) out of a total parcel acreage of 3.65. No street
improvements were required to be installed with development of this parcel.
Payment of DIF fees was required in-lieu of street improvements.
Total street frontage along East H Street is approximately 570 1 ineal feet.
Total street frontage along Otay Lakes Road is approximately 550 lineal feet.
1')..-2.
Page 3, Item 12.
Meeting Date 9/24/91
OTHER PROJECT REOUIREMENTS
Northeast corner of Otav Vallev Road and Nirvana (Girard Financial CorD.)
This project is very similar to the parcel owned by Kelton Title Corporation.
This project consisted of two parcels having frontage on two streets with both
required to dedicate right-of-way as conditions of development. Total
dedi cat i on requi red of the westerly parcel was 0.465 acres out of a tot a 1
parcel acreage of 3.728. This parcel has a total of 1266 1 ineal feet of
frontage along Otay Valley Road and approximately 980 1 ineal feet of frontage
along Maxwell Road. In addition, the developer was required to provide all
street improvements on both Otay Valley Road and Maxwell Road adjacent to the
project. Since these requirements were conditions of a Parcel Map, the street
improvements were not required until a permit for development was requested.
The easterly parcel was required to dedicate 0.327 acre out of a total parcel
acreage of 5.097. Street improvements were also required for all frontage.
This parcel has approximately 475 lineal feet of frontage on Otay Valley Road
and approximately 292 lineal feet of frontage on Maxwell Road.
The developer was also required to contribute $29,000 to the City for
right-of-way acquisition on the south side of the road since the roadway was
being widened disproportionately to the south.
This project is not within the Eastern Territories DIF boundary, but is within
a proposed assessment district which is currently in the process of being
formed. The assessment di stri ct wi 11 i ncl ude credit for all improvements
which are in place at the time of formation. Right-of-way being dedicated
will not receive credit because that dedication is viewed as an obligation of
the adjacent parcel since there is direct access to the roadway.
Bonita Point Plaza (northwest corner Otav lakes Road and East H Street)
Street dedications and improvements were requirements of a Parcel Map which
was filed for this project. The street dedications were required prior to
approval of the Final Parcel Map. Street improvements were required as part
of the development of the current commercial center. This project dedicated a
total of 1.128 acres for street right-of-way out of a total acreage of 11.008
acres. Their DIF was calculated on the gross acreage of the parcel after
dedications. Total DIF assessed against the site was $830,315.20 of which the
developer was to be given credit towards the fee for eligible DIF improvements
which they installed. Those improvements credits toward the DIF came to
$495,590.12, but no credit was given for right-of-way dedication.
Unocal Project (northwest corner Otav lakes Road and East H Street)
The development of this parcel with the Unocal service station required
additional street dedication beyond that required by the Bonita Point Plaza
project. The additional dedication amounted to 0.036 acres. In addition, the
project was required to remove some existing improvements and widen on East H
Street. This project received $10,000 in DIF credits for their eligible
improvements but none for the right-of-way.
I/. ,3
Page 4, Item I~
Meeting Oate 9/24/91
Bonita Professional Plaza (180 Otav Lakes Road)
This project was required to dedicate right-of-way along the frontage of the
property. Total dedication required from this parcel was 0.018 acres out of a
parcel total acreage of 2.056. This parcel has a total frontage along Otay
Lakes Road of approximately 517 lineal feet.
No OIF credit for the improvement of the frontage was given since this parcel
did not have existing improvements adjacent to the site nor was credit given
for right-of-way dedication. In addition, the OIF fees paid with issuance of
building permits was $137,004.
Genesis South (northeast corner of Broadwav and Palomar St.)
Street dedications and improvements were required of this project as
conditions associated with building permits in accordance with the Municipal
Code. This project dedicated a total of 0.12 acres for street right-of-way
out of a total of 2.14 acres. The right-of-way dedicated included an area to
install a right turn lane on Palomar Street which is beyond the normal general
plan requirements. This project is in the western area of the City and not
subject to the transportation OIF. Cost of required street improvements are
estimated at $62,188.
SUMMARY OF PROJECTS
Exhibit A summarizes the various projects, the improvements and right-of-way
required for each project. As indicated in the chart, the Kelton project is
not the only project which was required to dedicate more than 10 percent of
the parcel. In the case of the Bonita Point Plaza project, the OIF paid was
well in excess of the credits given. No credit was given for right-of-way
dedicated.
The Unocal parcel on the opposite corner was required to further dedicate a
small additional portion of land construct improvements and pay the OIF. They
did get some OIF credit for improvements only.
Bonita Profess i ona 1 Pl aza was requi red to dedi cate a small portion of land,
construct improvements and pay the OIF. They received no OIF credits.
The other projects, although not in the area required to pay the OIF, were
required to dedicate significant amounts of area for street purposes. In
addition, each parcel was required to construct improvements adjacent to their
property.
I~-l/
Page 5, Item I~
Meeting Date 9/24/91
Alternatives
Should Council decide that credit should be given for some of the right-of-way
required for dedication, staff suggests the following alternatives:
Allow credit for right-of-way dedication
right-of-way for turn lanes at intersections
for the straight segments of a prime
right-of-way); or
2. Allow credit for any portion of dedication in excess of 10 percent of the
parcel.
1.
that provides additional
width greater than required
arterial (128 foot total
The value of the right-of-way required to be dedicated is estimated to range
from $2 to $6 per square foot for the pre-amendment zoni ng desi gnat i on of
low-medium residential. If the current retail commercial designation is used
to determine the value, it is estimated to range from $20 to $35 per square
foot. Should Council elect either of these alternatives, staff suggests that
the value be based on the pre-amendment land use designation since the
applicant benefited from the redesignation with the overall value of his
property significantly increasing.
In alternate I, the amount of ri ght-of-way requ i red over and above normal
prime arteri a 1 standards is 2,100 square feet. Us i ng mi d-range val ues the
amount of credit would be as follows:
Desionation
Value
Area Total
Low-Medium Density Residential
Retail Commercial
$ 4.00jSF
$27.50jSF
2,100 SF $ 8,400
2,100 SF $57,750
In alternate 2, the tot a 1 area to be dedi cated is 21,126 square feet. The
total area of the parcel is currently 3.65 acres, or 158,994 square feet. Ten
percent of the total area is 15,900 square feet and the amount of dedication
required over 10% of parcel size is 5,226 square feet. The amount of credit
would be as follows:
Desionation
Value
Area
Total
Low-Medium Density Residential
Retail Commercial
$ 4.00jSF
$27.50jSF
5,226 SF
5,226 SF
$ 20,904
$143,715
It-5
Page 6, Item 1'2..
Meeting Date 9/24/91
Recommendation
Staff does not recommend glvlng credit for additional right-of-way dedication
for this project for the following reasons:
1. The DIF program was not setup to pay for right-of-way dedications except
for SR-125 and for areas where no development was anticipated. For
SR-125 the DIF would only pay for right-of-way beyond that required for
the City's prime arteri a 1 standard. The EastLake dedi cat i on for
right-of-way included no DIF credits as provided in the development
agreement.
2. Right-of-way dedication has historically been the requirement of the
adjacent parcel since the property receives direct benefit from having
that access. Right-of-way has also been required in conjunction with the
general plan requirements and increased traffic generation.
3. Specifically related to this parcel, a commercial site on a corner of two
major streets causes more congest i on due to hi gher traffi c gene rat i on
rates and significantly more turning movements at the driveways. The
change in land use from residential to commercial for the ultimate
benefit of the developer, therefore, resulted in an even greater need for
the right-of-way. Staff bel ieves it is appropriate to at least provide
right- of-way for a later DIF project which will construct the necessary
trave 1 1 anes, i ncl udi ng turn 1 anes to handl e thi s development's
additional traffic generation and traffic flow patterns.
4. Through the very act of redes ignat i on the 1 and use on thi s property the
developer received the benefit of a very substantial increase in value of
his entire parcel. This increase in value to the parcel is several times
the value of the right-of-way to be dedicated. Therefore, there appears
to be no hardship impact.
5. Further, in terms of hardship, this parcel should be viewed not as an
isolated 3.6 acre parcel, but as the final part of an overall development
plan of 435 acres.
6. Right-of-way values vary significantly depending on the type of use
allowed and the location of the project among other variables. Paying
for right-of-way would require appraisal services and would be very
difficult to estimate for inclusion in the DIF program.
7. Right-of-way has not been considered for DIF credit in the past and to do
so at this time would be inequitable for all those developers who had to
fo 11 ow the program to date. It woul d also set a precedent for future
dedications.
8. Changing the program at this time would require a refund of monies for
all those parcels which dedicated land that fit the criteria established
as a result of the change in order to be equitable.
I~.~
Page 7, Item ,,~
Meeting Date 9/24/91
FISCAL IMPACT: 1 f staff's recommendation is approved, there woul d be no
fiscal impact to the City. If either of the alternatives are approved, the
cost to the DIF fund would be between $8,400 and $143,715. In addition, the
DIF would have to be revised to make up for this amount as well as to pay for
any future dedications that would receive credit.
WPC 5749E
11--7
EXHIBIT A
SUMMARY OF PROJECT REQUIREMENTS
RATIO
ROil OED TO
GROSS ROIl GROSS ACRES DIF REQUIRED DJF IMP
PROJECT LOCATIONINAME ~ ACRES OED PERCENT FEE IMP. COST CREDIT
GIRARD IIESTERLY PARCEL IHD 3.728 0.465*** 12.5 HIA $111,200.00** HIA
GIRARD EASTERLY PARCEL IND 5.097 0.327 6.4 NIA 41,745.00** NIA
BON IT A POINT PLAZA RETAIL COM 11.008 1.128 10.2 $808,211.42 $506,343.00 $495,590.12
BON IT A PROF. PLAZA OFFICE COM 2.056 0.018 0.9 $119,700.00 $ 81,083.00** NONE
UNOCAL PARCEL COMMERCIAL 0.677 0.006 0.9 $ 77,178.00 $ 21,700.00** $ 10,000.00
KELTON PARCEL RETAIL COM 3.65 0.485 13.3 $387,396.00** NONE NONE
GENESIS SOUTH RETAIL COM 2.14 0.12 5.6 NIA $ 62,188.00 NIA
*ACTUAL AMOUNT PAID AT RATE IN EFFECT ON DATE BUILDING PERMIT liAS ISSUED
**ESTIMATED AMOUNT BASED UPON CURRENT FEE/ESTIMATE
***IN ADDITION TO THE DEDICATION FROM THE PARCEL MAP, THE DEVELOPER
PAID $29,000.00 TOIIARDS PURCHASE OF ROil ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF OTAY VALLEY ROAD
/1-- q
f'"
-..-
~'-" .
!".
--
~
J
" rtl'. ~,1.
.. ~1C~(I:.'r.ll,.o.
~ ~r"io.Q~1I ILt''''''''
~ fI(l.1.1 "'tC7o'\~"':J ~1
i ~U-'iK3 '~f.1ID. s~~'f,..
11 St:~~li AIoD Soe.'i.
> '
!
~;~;; .
~
t
~~::: ~
:;=~::
.
.
..~--- .
~~~~~ I
"j-:
.
i:;::::;:; ~
ii \;
i
"
-
.
.
~
~
=.
~~ :
;;: ~I:;:
~=
~:;;
,-
=
~
"
S~
..
-, /'
~\-o:~/ ,
"',-
,~
,-
.
.
~
~
"" -->...
->
~o"'\)
~ o~
...
ti>
<>-,c..
'" '7-
o
~
~ <>
~
~,c..
<>-
.<l
.
.J-
-~
j:!t
w
c
.J
W
U
a:
It
~
I,
--
~I
.
. .
/'"
,.:;.
J
.....-::; .~
/ ~.
::.,,:1-
~~t
!!~;
..,
~~~
-~.
~~~
It. -//;
-
-~,~-,".."
~-
"""'--_...
.
i !:~;:!dlf::iI
~ u;~;;:::a
I U'.iUii
u;;:U:!
. IEE5~~:i~
. iiH~i"
t ::::::::
i .ii.
= !~I;
):
~
:; J ~t~;
2 ~ ;.~.
!, :~:::
0:; "......~
~1mS
!!!
u -
ltJ 2:
CJ) rei
~ II) IT)'"
....... O)~...
- . tDi~
. 5: r---,..;
w - .
i c: uj~
'"
~~~ ~
c:~~ ~
"
r: ~.
iI
-
~7ff;15 ON
J Z
~
--,. Z
~
~
r--
-''''
~tO
c:
I- -
,~ 0
:JZ
~ "-
-<1;
:;;:
~
b
iii
I-
<C
~
o
w
o
<C
w
a:
<C
~ '0
N 133H5 335
1'-- II
.-
.
.
.
,
;
~I ~;;;~:~;~~;~~~~~~~q~i;
U;~1;;S:JI::I
'I iiliiiilj'.... ...
~ ~~lliiS~~::;!~~~~~~~.~
ilHimmi!i;;;;;;;;;;
, :_ ft_ ~~~~.~~-
w1 ::;b::~c~:uu;aEa~~E';~~~5~:
--../'
,-
:.,. '-~- /"
" '
,";\
',;~
"
..
Ii
I
'1
N-
-J~
W_
U
~~
"''''
.'....1
~ i.
.
"
'.
'.
..
" Ii
itl II
~,
" 1
'L
...
~_ ,'''-'":i.-:i{:ii"
::i ~~ I~
(I---I:J ~
," I If I" ·
~: I 1 i",ii i!
~f. ~ :3)""
~' . T-"
~ I 1;,- ___1./......"""..
'" r.,i~
~ ",!,J.",--:',\ ,
;;; for---.J\:'
~ ,," I dlljl
~! ~~.!p~
E: ,<"I"'. ~ ~ ~
~.: II !'t.i1i" , :1-:1
. .
~: ~.i~ 1 " ~
, I.
.
'.
:Ia
.101- f;
tt~
, ~
I ) t
"J ::
;!
I;
,
l'
,
"
,: ~ ,I:
; . '~
,Ii
I
,~'
'0'
"
""
~,
"
I~)
J!
rl,-f
"
2 .
~ ~ ~
~ .... ...
i: ~ ~~ ~ ~
\I ~ ~ :~ ~ t
:. S h o:!
~ ~ ~i ~ ~
~ '" ~ 1::): '"
~ ~ i!: ~~ ~ J
~ .., :~ ii 2
5 .. ~ ~;11 ~ ~
i!i is C5 ~~ ~ ~
;/00 : ~j D~
~/
~.p-"'''''
*i~
"-
'"
~Q
~
"-
"-
"
"
~!t
e;:;;
t~
.
A,'?
"JI;<-
~"
,~.
"
(tj)/
~,
Q.'r\
~ ~~
,
~
f;661
~ .
~~~=
~i~::
~~
"
.
i,
.-~
.~
~~o.;
o
. ~
~ ::::
,~~
I~~
.~.
..-
~~!
'!!:~.::::
!r~
<I) ~,~
~ ~..\!!
_ ..;:5
" Ii"
<q:oc i'!
~ ~..~
:!s'u...
..~~
~ i.:!
~ ...~-
IQ ~)i:S
~~j
~~I~
~~~~
~5~~=:
I'd~~~~~
~i~~i!E~~
~ ::a!~ta
~ i:i~~~ '"
~ ~~...~~~~
ti:MiE~~:~ =
>
:~' . " ,....
.,1
~
.
~
I
~
.
.
~
"'I"
~ ;'!
o ·
~ 0
i
" I
. ,'!,: ~ ~.
. -; I
!
.
J 1-
,
,
!
~
.
~
.
~
~JI
jIi ~
;11\ .
!I! .
pi;
~!! "I,!
ii L'
-
,
i ;
! : j
i J
0'"
,..
l
~ I
;; --
J .
.
o
.
.~
~
....31::
.....
~ ....
. ....."
'It--
\0 N~
~ "
in ....
~ \~ J
t::: II
~ 1/ I
It .0~L 5TA. 2~!!'50.Z~
, 1I.!!lI' '"'- ......"""'- Its. 55~
'N7Z"S"57"E 249.18 - ~" 4:s;
"~I,;;~ I.r-tk. CAMINO DEL CERtrO GRANDE
~~ r
5A5/S Of /JEARING~ TIE------ 'it:: i
~o~'TA...PeoFESSIO~
~
a
STREET DEDICATION
/N A PORTION OF 1/4 ~ECntm 58 AND 59 OF
RANCHO DE LA NACION MAP NO.II#ID
OAt> .
~~~~
~~
,;;
~
.
~.
RHO. ( DE LA
I NACJON
~
~
~ JyJAP NO. J 66
I.C'I
T.P.O.B.
114 SEC. 58
1/4 SEC. 59
(
. \
~ \
:;
~
""
."
Or>
i-
on
-
:2:
1\----
~
1\
I.
~
.s
....
<::I
-
\
\
.I
....
...
,..:
;r;
.Q
~
Q(
<::I
<::I
.,;
....
CI)",
~
~
-..
_5JJ.:_
1\
I>..
I~
o
SO'
31::
i\..
~
-
"
....
2
IJ,.{3
~
BASIS OF BEARINGS
TUE BA5/5 Of 6EARINI>S FOR TUIS DRAWING
,~ A PORTION OF nlE CENTERLINE OF
DTAY LAII"f5 nOAD PER RECORD OF SURVEY
MAP NO. IZ584 , I.E.. N W4ff""W
LEGEND
~
INDIt:ATE~ 5TRffT DEDICATION
5HOWN THUS
fi)
to
o
"1.1)
A.P.N.
5'i~ -0'.1./1.
~
o
z:
Q.,
<C
-;:
..-.:::,
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
N 88049'2fD"W 7/1#. 8~'
BASIS OF BEARING5--" -
~ OTAY LAKE'!> ROAD PER
I
t-
.
RICK .NClIN..RINCI COMPANY
CIVIL ._.."'. '.U"'V.VDA8' ,",-AN__
S1520 FRIARS ROAD SAN DIEGO, CAllfORMA t2 t 10 (II') 2110717
:JO" ~ ~o D'tIYE CARlS.AD. CALIF(NIIMA 'HOe (III) In ...,
3IS S "ANCHO SANTA FE lItO SAN ""ACOS. CA 12011 (11'1 ,.....
PRJ...ECT "'-'VIBER 1/"9
SCALE 1""00' DATE 7./I."n
,'iiIIl11""
jIr
---
lEGEND
= AREA OF DEDICATIm;
= POINT OF BEGINNING
^'~
ct>'
~
;~
/;'
,
,'"
,
,
!\..
It)
/ ~
/
-1'
~?
.35,
<-~~
Iv ><-
-''SZ..>
c'
.\.......
\ ~
,,,,\.-~y
'.>.::::----
N
N IB'Z3'1"'W '.SO'
.
-.
,"- ~".,..
0\ ""jt,
...., \' ~
",,1.-\ ..,101\10.
<e....... g
'I-~
or
"b
EXWE:T !
S~eet :: of ~
N
VICINITY MAP
NO SCALf
ONOC,PtL P~RC.E'-
~
~Oh
........ ~ >-
<...g.f:;i
S-s
........~Q
_.~
01-
~>.
3$.
<3.,
,-,,-
<'~
<-'3
,
APN 594-1'3J-J2.
:;J~ :~ ,... :=- I
I . ~. .t_...._ t__
:;:
~.-
, ,~-
" .
~-,"':"/: .~. ~ I ,
... h :~.,:;:;
IV 3Z'Z4'37"E Z.S.OC'
f'i 17'54 '10"'" ~SC"
D=00'3;3'Z":' ,,10
- i'?'Z' "E~ ~
"" ~ R= 205,}.0':: .Q?'c;,D ~ j. 1/
r-';,; ~" /L: 20 0.. /~ "1'1.~'" ..s /0\. ,013.
~.... t( ." , rq,,.. . '"". 50 , \
. "... \; \;!,),~ 12-'v-,
i.\ ~:s / j 1'-' " OC!" E ,.; "1"1 '2-\ Y t: c;
-' II> .' ~ 1Z"0 ./ Zt :.>
-~ @ tc;,~ , \0' 0'1" ( 517'54'1O"E "50' \--
So ~3 t.l,'2-1? \')'
\.V 51 S
4 p=OO'33'Z5" --
(j) R= Z057. 50' ________
L~ 20.00' ~@ -
\ \--\' ~
\ fp..S'-
4-~
13. ..1'1
PREPARED BY:
HALE SURVEYORS, INC.
7863 LA MESA BLVD '201
LA MESA, CA 92041
(613) 465-3555
HIGH
SCHOOL
EAST
-H-
STREET
;
o
-0 -0)
'" '"
'::"~....L'-:'-_:_'
-
APPROXIMATE ROW LOCATION, AREA
OF PROPOSED DEDICA TION
'"
en
N
college
).
./
'\.
. /"
/\,
/'1\
,
,
).
\
,. ,
:' ,
.,
, "
, /'
/\
0.485 ACRES
southwestern
~o
'9()
-
KELTON PARCEL
I~ ,/5
-
88 '
2 ~f~
~
yj~t
~~~
~ t; :i: ItjOO~ C;Y;3tv39
o ..
I"r-I
zWI
,,\ \
\ ,~ __- ,'ZIr.'g;;Z
\
\
IQ I ....- - 1 28'9gZ
~\ I g
~ w-::-
.. ".".' ...."I';,~.!i...."".
I-
~ ~5 ~ !
.... a: - ....J IN
I- Q;..
~ ~~ a. ~
....~~
f- <;:fij --
w9w -
w(1oc.
IO::!n,
(j) Cfl UlI
,
.
.
8
~
.
.
- /0;;;
. ~~l:~~
.' ~
.a:)'~ 'Mu9'Z 112 091 'N "
'3119Z,120!CI'S --- "
.. -
............. (J/) i\1 'M taG eG lL'S .'
.............. "T>a II I Oll'~<
..... ....... ,/t> "f-.. I v.:::I', .
............ .'US
,. .......................... ,9
-----------,----
0:1) 'M.ZOtc:?-/Jl N
"A
1,/'
*-....---- -1-,;---
(~) 'MIIW,~091'N-
( p" I
- I
IRSt _
~ ~~ ~
r=.J" ~
S -1 N
lS ~2
~ '" ,-,
oc. 0:: I r.I
= :0 _I ?:
O ~83!5I:O
- - ~ IS)
.,'~W \Ba= 110
. .. ~ I ~
R)g)-~I !.....
'" I r-
<] '<1 ,1'\
\ !... I UI
l "I"":,
. ~ \ ',(f) I \
(~) 'MIIZOI~ogl N ...... l' \
----- -- -\-r .
'Mlllf3Z,LZo91 N--..... I
v . 311<a3,L2~o9I'g - -- i. I ,
10 'M/~ '.l..GI)Q "I
~I
'MtltdZ,LZo9\'N ~ :
A 'IMa'lOI::l8 ~I~
IIJ.......
.SZ'99Z
..
\
- t"'(\
q--~
I f I
w~~~
f-- I I I
-11:)\S)G)
(j) (g \9 <S)
z
~
';;t
.
-@
1b3'OE.~
I ).~/v
~
ole...". c.'I' cz.n W'OOIttONYtIIOII.une""Wa1PfVlWY1l1lt01... C
I
~
2
~
DNINNVld
E>NIA3^\:JOS
ONI'='93NIDNiI
,I:
\1917
pt?
~ 'f--
~ W
.w
-1 a:
I~ f--
I (j),
,d7~
II a:
uj 0:: <C
=~.. ~
~ i?~ 0
~ ,jB -I
!... In 0') <C
r--co
f ~t i a.
I /LJ_(~l
"MaW. 0~1'f'l
" -.
- 101-
.z
0-
~~
---
HIGH
SCHOOL
EAST
-H-
STREET
o
-0 -0)
'" "'
'-~~-----
PROPOSED DEDICA T'ION
'"
en
'"
0.485 ACRES
"-
, "-
'\
1'"
\
\
).
\
southwestern
college
; "-
"-
"-
; ,
. j'
/\
-
KELTON PARCEL
12../7
DATE:
September 20, 1991
SUBJECT:
Mayor Tim Nader
,\",\.".,
~~. Richard Rudolf, Asst. City Attorney
Appointments to Boards and Commissions
TO:
FROM:
You inquired whether it would require a change to the Charter to
have the Council nominate and appoint members to the Rent Review
Commission, as opposed to the Mayor nominating, and the Council
approving such members. The answer is no.
Charter Section 602 relates to the appointment of members of all
boards and commissions, whether created by Charter or by the
Council by ordinance. It provides that members are appointed by
the City Council by at least three affirmative votes. The
Charter is silent with regard to the manner of nomination of
persons for such appointments.
However, City Council Policies 110-01 and 110-02 relate to the
Council's pOlicy with regard to such appointments. The most
pertinent one is Council policy 110-02, effective August 27, 1983
wherein the Council by minute order adopted the policy of the
Council conducting interviews for the potential members of the
Planning Commission, Civil Service Commission, Board o"f Appeals
and the Library Board of Trustees. As to all other boards or
commissions, the Council's policy is for the Mayor to conduct
interviews, with the appointments "ratified", pursuant to the
Charter provision, by the Council.
DRR:lgk
cc: All Councilmembers
9322a
IS
/1/1