The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 1991/08/27 Tuesday, August 27, 1991 6:00 p.m. "l decla;e under pent!lty of -::erjury that I am employed by t:le .Gi'~y oi ,.:;'<~1;3 Vista in the Office or the City e!e>:.; :~n:: that I posted this Agenda/Notj.::e en the .~~:li::l'::n Board at the Public Scrv~ccs 8:; !. ),,', ..nd at C!ty Hail on r'A""-r) <-J fr,. c.-~..,..,,~ -, " ..; I 1:.... l'>2.~ --..~ ;:,l,\;,',~,::.~ '. -'.Jl..I{'''''- t - Council Chambers Public Services Building Resmlar MeetinS?: CAll. TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Grasser Horton _, Malcolm _, Moore -' Rindone _, and Mayor Nader _' 2, PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO 1HE FLAG. SILENf PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINlITES: August 13, 1991 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF 1HE DAY: CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 10) The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by 01U! nwtion withou.t discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a -Request to Speak Form- available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Public Hearings and Oral Communications. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITI'EN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Request for a stop sign at the north comer of Crestview and Country Vistas in Bonita Long Canyon - Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker, 1481 Rimcrest Court, Bonita, California. b. Request to eliminate the dangerous conditions on Main Street created by the Car Auction and Abre Towing - Antonio Castro, Sr., 158 Tenth Street, Chula Vista, 91910 6. RESOLlfIlON 16330 ACCEPTING FEDERAL liBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACf GRANT FOR 1HE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, APPROPRIATING FUNDS, AND AMENDING 1HE FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 BUDGET - The State of California has approved the Chula Vista Public Library's application for grant funds in the amount of $15,000 ($5,000 per library facility) for the development of a Grandparents and Book Program. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Library) (Requires 4/Sths vote) Agenda -2- August 27, 1991 7. RESOLUTION 16331 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONfRACf TO BONITA ELECTRIC FOR STREET UGHf REWIRING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS - On July 25, 1991, staff was informed that the street lights were not operating along Otay Lakes Road northwest of Avenida del Rey and Ridgeview Way. Staff discovered that the conductors feeding these street lights, as well as at two other locations, had been stolen. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 8. RESOLUTION 16332 Alm-IORIZING TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY ON SEPTEMBER 21 AND 22, 1991 FORAN ORANGE CRATE DERBY UPON CONDITIONS - The Bonita Orange Crate Derby Committee is requesting permission to conduct an Orange Crate Derby on Rancho del Rey Parkway on Saturday and Sunday, September 21 and 22, 1991. Staff recommends approval of the resolution subject to staff conditions. (Director of Parks and Recreation) 9. REPORT ON CHULA VISTA TRANSIT CCVO RADIO COMMUNICATION STUDY - Phase I of the Study has been completed. This report discusses recommendations which include cvr obtaining its own operating frequency and upgraded radio communications equipment. Staff recommends that Council recommend to SCOOT Board: (1) accept Phase I Study recommendations and direct the Richter Group to conduct Phase II and (2) submit an amended Fiscal Year 1991-92 Transportation Development Act (TDA) 4.0 Claim in the amount of $71,800 ($7,800 for Richter Group Phase II consultant services and $64,000 for communications equipment procurement). (Director of Public Works) 10. REPORT REQUEST TO CONDUCf PARADE FROM MONTGOMERY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL - Montgomery Elementary School is requesting permission to conduct a school parade on October 11,1991. Staff recommends approval of the request subject to staff conditions. (Director of Parks and Recreation) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out the -Request to Speak Form- available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommerukltion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five miJru.tes per individual 11. PUBUC HEARING REGARDING RATE INCREASE REQUESTED FOR REFUSE COUEGnON SERVICES BY LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. - Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first reading and approve the resolutions. (Director of Finance and City Attorney) Continued from the meetings of 7/16/91 and 8/13/91. Agenda -3- August 27, 1991 ORDINANCE 2475 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1993 CLARIFYING METI-lOOOLOGY FOR CALCUlATING FUI1JRE RATE INCREASES TO COll.ECT AND DISPOSE OF REFUSE - (first readinR:) RESOLt.mON 16301 APPROVING, AFTER PUBliC HEARING, RATES FOR COll.ECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOliD WASTE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1991 AND ESTABliSHING A WASTE MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TI-IE CI1Y GENERAL PLAN - Based on what the Council decides during the Public Hearing, the City Attorney should be directed to bring back the appropriate General Plan Amendment Resolution and Zoning Ordinances. (Director of Planning) 12. PUBliC HEARING A. GPA-91-03, PCZ-91-E: OTY-INITIATED PROPOSAL TO AMEND TI-IE OTY GENERAL PLAN FROM RESEARCH AND liMITED MANUFACTURING TO RETAIL COMMERCIAL, TI-IE MONTGOMERY SPEOFIC PLAN FROM RESEARCH AND liMITED INDUSTRIAL TO MERCANTILE AND OFFICE COMMERaAL, AND A REZONE FROM OTY-ADOPTED COUNTY ZONE a.ASSIFICATION C-37 TO OTY C-T-P ZONE FOR CERTAIN TERRITORY AT TI-IE SOUTI-IWEST CORNER OF MAIN STREET AND BROADWAY- Pursuant to Council referral, the above actions address a portion of a Special Study Area of the Montgomery Specific Plan and provide for the intended rebuild and expansion of the existing Gtay Market at the southwest comer of Main Street and Broadway. Staff recommends approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment and Rezoning. B. GPA-90-01, PCZ-90-B: PROPOSAL TO AMEND TI-IE LAND USE DIAGRAM OF TI-IE OTY GENERAL PLAN BYREDESIGNATION FROM "LOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL- (3-6 DUlAC) AND -SPECIAL STUDY- TO ~TAIL COMMERCIAL- AND TO CHANGE TI-IE ZONING a.ASSIFICATION FROM R-l TO C-C-P FOR APPROXIMATELY 3.65 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT TI-IE SOurnEAST CORNER OF EAST H STREET AND OTAY LAKES ROAD - Kelton Title Corporation has requested a General Plan amendment and rezoning to allow development of a retail convenience center on this site. Based on analysis of alternative land uses for this site, staff recommends that the applicant's request be denied, and the site be redesignated as ~Professional and Administrative Commercial~ with rezoning to C-O-P (Administrative and Professional Office-Precise Plan). ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agend4 (State law, Iwwever, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow -Request to Speak Under Oral Comrnunkations Form- available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those wlw wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. Agenda -4- August 27, 1991 ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit subslLlntial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the CouIu:il and staff recommen.dations may in certIlin cases be presented in the altemative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a -Request to SpeaP form avaiJJlble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 13. REPORT REPORT ON TRAFFIC CONCERNS ON POINT BARROW DRIVE - The City Council received a letter with a petition from Mrs. Jean Adams, a resident of the Robinhood Point area, requesting that something be done to reduce the speed of vehicles on Point Barrow Drive. Staff recommends denial of Mrs. Adam's request for speed bumps and acceptance of staff and Safety Commission's recommendation. (Director of Public Works) Continued from meeting of 8/20/91) 14. RESOLUTION 16286 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE 01YWIDE STREET SWEEPING AGREEMENT EXTENDING SAME FORONEADDmONAL YEAR - On 9/15/87, Council approved a contract with Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. to provide street sweeping. The agreement provided for three years of street sweeping with the contract price to be adjusted each year by the San Diego Area CPI. In addition, the agreement permitted two additional one- year extensions upon satisfactory negotiation of a contract price. On 9/11/91, Council approved the first amendment to the agreement which extended the contract through 8/31191. Staff and Laidlaw have negotiated a price to provide citywide street sweeping services through 8/31192 for the second and final year extension as included in the contract. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) Continued from the meetings of 8/6/91 and 8/20/91. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items puHed at the request of the public will be considered prior to those puHed by CounciImembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual Agenda -5- August 27, 1991 OTI-IER BUSINESS 15. CI'IY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) a. Scheduling of meetings. 16. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) a. Designation of Voting Delegate for League of California Cities Annual Conference, October 13-16 in San Francisco. b. Appointment of Gloria Hicks to the Human Relations Commission. 17. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Moore: Approval of distribution of letter regarding regional airport. Councilman Rindone: Request to expand after school recreational program at three additional sites with a second recreational aide at a cost of $7,260 from September 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992. ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to a joint meeting with the Economic Development Commission on Wednesday, August 28, 1991 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room; then to the Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, September 3, 1991 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. August 23, 1991 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager .,'\\ ~ City Council Meeting of August 27, 1991 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting scheduled for Tuesday, August 27, 1991. Comments regarding Written Communications are as follows: Sa. This is a request from Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker for a stop sign at the north corner of Crestview and Country Vistas in Bonita Long Canyon. IT IS RECOMMENDED THIS REQUEST BE REFERRED TO STAFF AND THE SAFETY COMMISSION FOR A REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 5b. This is a request from Antonio Castro, Sr. to eliminate alleged dangerous conditions on Main Street created by the Car Auction and Abre Towing. City staff is aware of the problem raised by Mr. Castro. The Department of Building and Housing's Code Enforcement Division and the Planning Department have been working closely with the owner of Abre Towing in an effort to expedite the relocation of this operation. The owner's plan is to relocate the au~tion related portion of the operation to the Otay Mesa area in October 1991. Relocation will be contingent upon receiving a CEQA Negative Declaration from the City of San Diego, which is scheduled on or about October 1, 1991. Mr. Castro will be notified of our findings. As an immediate response to the current complaint, Code Enforcement will solicit the assistance of the Police Department to help ensure that traffic and parking regulations are adhered to during the last two scheduled activities (August 28 and September 19). Staff will continue to monitor the progress of the relocation efforts and will advise Council if the process is delayed. Council should be advised that this is not the same complaint previously referred to staff, which involved similar activities at 3650 Main Street. In response to staff's enforcement efforts, that operation has been dis- continued. In view of the above, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS COMPLAINT BE RECEIVED AND FI LED. SWM:mab/51 ". ......-.....*--~~'".~^..~_.~"~'-',._......"'''_....~._.........,.,.".,,-~,_.~..-- o~ " \ I \Vj(!. . ,i,j , (. \,). ("i.'. 1\' \,jXI, , \ Dr. and Mrs. Robert Baker 1481 IIMeREST [IIRT BONITA, tALIFllNl1 91'12 ,.....,. i' \ ! i ~- i , I' ! i AUG I 6 1991 I. ~ ..., CITY'''' ,. --,,"~,--.J L';)U~\C!L n~ii-E':: CHlLA ViST~,' l'( " J j ~-~ ~~ August to, t 99 t The Honorable Tim Nader, Mayor of Chula Vista The City Council of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Ayenue Chula Vista CA 9 t 902 Dear 5i rs, We are writing to you concerning our request for a stop sign at the north comer of Crestview and Country Vistas, in Bonita Long Canyon. We had previously appeared at a Public 5afety meeting on 8/8/9 t to present our request. We feel that the committee misunderstood our request tlnd the reasons behind it and therefore denied our request. We are appealing to you. To briefly summarize, this corner has an obstructed view due to a hill that crests just to the north of the intersection. When a car is attempting to turn down the hill or cross directly through Country Vistas it is nearly impossible to tell if there is oncoming traffic. The city engineer referred to Country Vistas as a cul-de-sac. While it is true that there is no outlet, Country Vistas is a very long street ( longer than a mile), Crestview is a feeder from Corral Canyon, and there is a high volume of construction traffic wah both large and small trucks passing through to the McMillan homes still being built. These homes are selling well and more and more people are moving in. As we hope that you can see from the enclosed diagram, Crestview intersects a steep hill. The crest is just to our left when we turn ',nto Country Vistas from our street. The traffic builds up great momentum as 1t starts down the hill and frankly, the s1tuation is dangerous. We feel that the committee gave consideration only to the city engineer's report and not enough to evolving conditions in Long Canyon. We also asked only for a single stop sign (not a 4-way) on the north WRlnEN COM~UNICATIONS 6Q- J _.__"~",..~~>;_.___"'" "~ _ _m...'_'_'-__'" ._m_~"_~_"""""--"""""'--'~'".". comer s1nce that 1s the only one where y1S1blltty 1s an 1ssue (although we are told that for obscure reasons a 4 way ls easler to obta1n than a single or a three-way). We invite you to come out and see for yourself if our concerns are valid. We certainly realize that there are already many stop signs on the local streets and no one wants more than we do to dnye unimpeded. Nonetheless we feel that this situation is dangerous. We are concerned about the many small children in our area who may not be nimble enough to dodge the oncoming yehic1es when they try to cross what appears to be an empty street. Surely we do not need to watt for a tragedy to unfold. Sincerely yo~~ J -- cJ&~ ~~~;I:1a~v 5~ia and Robert Baker. [.0 u n t t-1d \i i ::; t ij::; ,. pte~~ p~+ "- s ~f ~,~" ~~ --- }' _~-~-.,.-- li Db::; tru c:teij v j e \"'i-" P'rncre.::::t r.! I ':Lt 'i.:~:1 ,-+ ...:.= ~. ,1) -- -:: 2 [: oun t t-!d \li s t iJ ::; 5f/.-~ ,._.~~._._~----_._~."~ J i (', , i '-....d \~,,-i .-.- l3l, r \ \ oJ IT,' _?' (~~,_ ~ r? ~ :v c.. rl y:r-I r f\.-1, ~ \.. \J'# ~ ~. .- ,r-- c: ( ~ !....0 :1 1'1) I ('.-I t (5\ \;:l (l -'" ,,- " ~ ('> 'f y -, ~ Is- - · l ~ ( . ( \r : ~ r?- ~"C. ') .-4. Cl' t ~ f \J l - r- \f'. tor ? ' 1f) "< ~ "t I /"( f~, 10.....::.. --,.--:1 <1 -- ? (o~ ~ ~ toP r ~~ ^' ~ ( ,.. ~ U "\J \Y ~ C. T . t rt) _ -.., "';;l '" \J' - . 0,.. 1" 3- ~~\J' ~ Di~ ~~. - p T}~ ~ t ~..... ;; ( I' ~, · ;:.. 1;: t --r . :r. '" ~ 1 r)'" -:J >>-' 0 '"' v rt:+ o:l' 10 (I!' 1 r L --+ ..., -..-r\ a \., 0- ~ 3 ;r. l;) \; ~}> ~ ~ ~[ Jlv>. ~~p~:~~~t~z (;' ~ 1 . 1> j "-\- l ~?-- C ' "~ c; VJ ~ ()" ~. ~ () ~ ~ r -:0 ~ ) r ~ 1 ~" 1: [ ~ ~,t ~ ~ -+;j 'f I ~ ~- , r- ~ 1 ,- ~ ~ ~ ~ :f ~ ~.."~ ~~ - P c."')\!' r t. l ~ \f'~ ~ ~ ~ t -, f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ 11 ;::-~Cf ~ t t ~ ~ ~~v?~~ ~p \. c E) \)V t ~ \11- rt f C::t ~ ~ 7 \AG~<>~-?g? c t 0 ~ t ~ J; ~ ~ c.~ f~YT~ 11 ~ j"t ~ '^ (t) ? ~. ..Jl?.J i-:\ '!.' ~ r f ---i >' 1 ~ 1,1:> t (, -: 7 r L> ( ~ ~u cJ + ~ ~ \ t ~ ~ r~ L \jJ V <r j , ~ ~~IT~f "~ f(') r 'f", ~; r-t ~ 't ') t t t- t" ~~~ f p--- Q 6l.~+~(-'0(,)J r~ ; r ; ~ ~~ t ?, ] r ~ ~ ~" X ~ ~ ;...\ /::."., ,A {.>r ~ b:-1 . \t) ..t: ~ f'l ~ \N 'r; ., .', ... (<r4' '. ,[:' j ...f' J." ~\-) ~ l) \f\ ~ $ '> n' C1 - fJ" ~- .... .... -=-- - () -;:: \-) 'i' 1tJ _ 4tJl, t ~ C'""'\II r~ ~ ~~ Fr- ' -..So }j"", ("':I " <. · r - .-,,] - \;>~, \.. rf-p -0 t r \) _-...[ ~~ ~ c-9 ?-s --s l(.0 -f, , ,-l iQ -l \f\ ~ ~ ~ ~'b '~ ":'I n 'e oS" Q.u '-L ~ /_ ,J -+ f'>.' ~ l:lo r- A:\ }> f'., -1--~ I" '-. J-1 I: \I' _ ~ 1 ~ / \:" () 1'0, C) ~ 'Cf f:l.' C\ 1 c""-L ('\ .-. 17..J' it' C (bt~\ ~ ,.-- ~_. I ~ ~ LJ... c/, (3) ~ l ~0 ~ 1 ~ ' l S-t- 'C ~ ~ -' '" (..'0 +-f I;.- ~ -i ~ ;l. ~ II ~~ ~~ ~ \J\ r- 3i f rj ~.t .~~-.J ~ -J rl...J V U ~ )-- - .j\ '""'; c- ~'~3.J~8 ("J -. '., \J . \J '- ~ !'"- .-J ....J i \.. ~ ~c{ 'C' -,.J 1 (~ ~~ tE_a_~ I-" ... .__ _ r J~_ .. , ... ..- ~ 4C. ~ ~ V\ LL (!) )' VI. ~~ . 1 ..'" ~ t , I. :') t).- - r '" --- a-- ~ -...: COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM-'- MEETING DATE 8-27-91 Resolution I'~ccepting Federal Library Services and Construction Act grant funds for the purchase of materials, appropriating funds and amending the FY 1991-92 budget. SUBMITTED BY: Library Director ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ ~O~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes~No__) The State of California has approved the Chula vista Public Library's application for grant funds in the amount of $15,000, $5,000 per library facility, for the development of a Grandparents and Books Programmes. ITEM TITLE: RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: On August 7, 1991 the Library Board of Trustees voted to support the Library's application for the Grandparents and Books Programme Development Grant DISCUSSION The State Librarian has recognized that there is a growing interest in inter-generational programs, an increase in the use of libraries by children, and the need to share successful library programs on a statewide basis. Therefore, he has made available a fund of up to $380,000 in federal Library Services and Construction Act (LSCA) funds for the development of Grandparents and Books Programmes in public libraries. Grant funds are to be used to reimburse libraries for the purchase of children's books and to develop incentives to use those books on an inter-generational basis. Funds are awarded to libraries where at least 30% of the service population is culturally diverse, limited English speaking and belong to anyone of the four target groups: American Indian, Asian, Black or Hispanic. If accepted, $4,000 of the grant funds for each facility will be used for the purchase of children's picture books in Spanish, $400 for printing a Spanish language bibliography, and $600 for the design and distribution of incentive buttons to children reading "Mi Abuelo me Ie a mi" (My Grandfather reads to me) and "Mi Abuela me lee a mi" (My grandmother reads to me). This project officially closes on September 30, 1991 and no new expenditures may be generated. All unexpended and unencumbered funds must be returned by November 13, 1991. ,-I FISCAL IMPACT: Accepting these grants will provide $15,000 to the City's General fund and this amount will be appropriated to the Library budget as reimbursement for the purchase of children's materials. ,- :l RESOLUTION NO. /" ~d RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FEDERAL LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION ACT GRANT FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF MATERIALS, APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND AMENDING THE FY 1991-92 BUDGET The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the State of California has approved the Chula Vista Public Library's application for grant funds in the amount of $15,000, $5,000 per library facility, for the development of a Grandparents and Books Program; and Trustees Grant. WHEREAS, on August 7, voted to support the 1991, the Library Library's application Board of for said NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept Federal Library Services and Construction Act grant funds for the purchase of material for the development of a Grandparents and Books Program. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $15,000 is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to amend the FY 1991-92 budget. Presented by ~ Rosemary Lane, Library Director 92l7a ~-3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 7 Meeting Date~ Resolution '''33/ Accepting bids and awarding contract to Bonita Electric for street light rewiring at various locations in the City of Chula Vista. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public ~ork~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager.J~ bO~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-1L) ITEM TITLE: On July 26, 1991, Staff was informed that the street lights were not operating along Otay Lakes Road northwest of Avenida del Rey and Ridgeview Way. Staff discovered that the conductors feeding these street lights, as well as at two other locations, had been stolen. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the subject resolution BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On July 26, 1991 staff discovered that the street lights at three locations; Otay Lakes Road, East H Street and Bay Boulevard were inoperative because of the theft of the copper wires necessary for operation. Each electrical connection box had been opened and the wires removed. The total loss of copper wires prior to July 27,1991 are as follows: otay Lakes Road East H Street Bay Boulevard 10,230 feet 1,650 feet 6,675 feet A report was made to the Chula Vista Police Department and a plan to make the electrical boxes more tamper proof was devised. As allowed by the Charter, the City Manager may conduct an informal bid for a project less than $25,000 thereby eliminating the time for a formal bid process. To expedite the replacement of the stolen street light wires, staff, on August 5, 1991 requested informal bids from three electrical contractors to replace the missing wires and install steel connection box covers. Subsequent to the informal bid request, additional locations where street light wires had been stolen, was discovered (see attached sketch). The replacement of wires at these locations will be handled seperately. 7- , Page 2, Item No. Meeting Date 8/27/91 Bids received from the three (3) qualified electrical contractors are as follows: 1. Bonita Electric 2. Patterson Brothers Lighting 3. TRASIG Corporation $ 20,186 $ 22,225 $ 23,851 staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the low bid of Bonita Electric. Bonita Electric has previously performed satisfactory work for the City. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Traffic Signal Maintenace Operating account for " Damage to City Property" to cover the cost of the contract. MWS:rdj (C:\BETT\BJA113D.DOC) 7-" ...... z ~ :s:: i"4 g tIl ,~ ~ ClO3:..... P:IO .... M...O' tIlM(Z1 \!il HM ~~~~ .,3 ~eo '>4 ..... '>4;( ;(3:~ b3! ~ ~ 8 ~ T..... o i"4 ~ 3: , ~~ 'H C\~tIl..... P:Cl~a. tIlC\;(1 ~~.,3~ ~fs<~~ OE-<..... ~:s::o i-'i"41O ~ 0 g~ ~ ~ 'p. ~ ..... ~.... tIl~(1\ ;(\ ~.,3~ ~~i"4_ till ..ceo '>4~"'" ..c"", bO i , ,~ ~tIl~ tIl~o;' tli"4r'l ~P.... p:, CO ~~..... bi"4 a \, \ \ \ -: ... -\ ~. " ') ~...... . ~.~ f , ! i "; ~ , 0.,3 Op. o ti-.,3..... ~~i~ _tIl .;.4.... J -.,3 I -p.fs<eo ~ 0..... tIl~ ;( tsl~ i"4 ~ ~ iI'~ ~ :z; ~~ , Cl 3: Q ..... P: 0 3:.... ~~O' tIl~HI ~u~~ - ell ~dClr-- ....H..... ~o~ b~O H~ ~ /' ~' ~~ ~ , tn..... . .... O~(1\ .. ~ 0 J> ctli"4~ ~~~ ctlt1l .., ~ -- ~~ t8 tI1 ~~ ~~ \e RESOLUTION NO.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR STREET LIGHT REWIRING AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the following three informal bids were received for street light rewiring at various locations in the City of Chula Vista: Bonita Electric Patterson Brothers Lighting TRASIG Corporation 120,186 22,225 23,851 and WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be awarded to the lowest responsible bidder, Bonita Electric who has assured the City that he is a licensed contractor in the State of California and can produce an acceptable performance bond. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept said three bids, and does hereby award the contract for said street light rewiring to Bonita Electric in the amount of $20,186 to be completed in accordance with the specifications as approved by the Director of Public Works of the City of Chula Vista. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the Ci ty of Chula Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the Ci ty of Chula Vista. Presented by ed as j or:n John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works 9216a City Attorney 7-r COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date B 8/27/91 Resolution 1'33J authorizing temporary closure of Rancho del Rey Parkway on September 21 and 22, 1991 for an Orange Crate Derby, upon conditions SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks and Recreatio~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~~ b(j~J (4/5thS\..Jote: Yes_No--.1L) ITEM TITLE: The Bonita Orange Crate Derby Committee is requesting Council to authorize a temporary street closure and grant permission to conduct an Orange Crate Derby on Rancho del Rey Parkway on Saturday and Sunday, September 21 and 22, 1991. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the resolution, subject to staff conditions. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Bonita Orange Crate Derby Committee (sponsor) is requesting permission to conduct the Twelfth Annual Orange Crate Derby on Saturday and Sunday, September 21 and 22, 1991. The event would be conducted on Rancho del Rey Parkway, between the west security gate of the Rancho del Rey development and Avenida del Rey (see Attachment "A" for a map). The street would be closed to traffic between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. on both days. In addition, night-time traffic would be slightly impacted, since the sponsor would like to leave some event equipment on one or both sides of the street overnight. The sponsor expects that approximately 150 youngsters, ages 6 to 13 years old, and 100 separate derby cars, would be involved in the double elimination competition during the two-day event. The derby cars are built by families, according to specifications provided by the sponsor. Each car is equipped with a steering wheel (steering capacity is limited to avoid "over-steering" by young drivers) and a friction-drag braking device. Each car is inspected to verify that safety equipment is in working order and drivers are required to wear helmets, long pants, and sturdy shoes. The race course is approximately 1,500 feet in length, with no curves. The cars are started from a declined ramp constructed of wood. The entire race course is lined with hay bales on both sides, and the lanes are separated with traffic safety cones (which act as "brakes" if a car crosses the center line). The run-out area below the finish line is lined with traffic cones and hay [derby] 1 8--1 Item Meeting Date 8/21/91 bales. Only two cars are on the race course at anyone time. Spectator areas are designated and separated from the race course by hay bales and flag lines. The sponsor has agreed to provide insurance, portable toilets, appropriate trash containers and trash control; necessary traffic barricades, cones, and directional signs; and overnight security (most cars will remain at the event site overnight) at their own expense. The sponsor has contacted the Police Department and has been advised by the police as to the appropriate barriers and traffic regulators which are required for crowd and traffic control. The sponsor is paying for all police services. The Environmemntal Review Coordinator has reviewed the event request and has found that it is a Class 4 (e) exemption from CEQA requirements. This event has been conducted on Briarwood Road (off of Sweetwater) in the County for the past eleven years. The sponsor would prefer the city site, since traffic and parking problems would be greatly reduced. McMillin Communities is one of the event backers and is fully supportive of the event at the proposed location. The impact to residents in the area is relatively minimal. Development west of Avenida Del Rey is limited at the current time, however, further development in this area may make this site less desirable in future years. All homes south of Rancho del Rey Parkway will have unlimited and unobstructed access during the two-day event. However, there are several homes in Belmonte Estates that are inhabited, and several more under construction. There will be no direct access to these homes during the two days of the event, which may pose a problem to the feasibility of this site for the event. The homeowners have been notified in writing by McMillin, and the sponsor has agreed to make arrangements for limited access to and from the homes during the event. If approval is granted for this event, it is recommended the sponsor be subject to the following conditions: 1. The sponsor shall submit proof of insurance in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy endorsement for $1 million, naming the city as additional insured. The Risk Manager's Office has reviewed this condition and concurs. 2. The sponsor shall execute the standard hold harmless agreement. [derby] 2 8-~ Item Meeting Date 8/2'/91 3. The sponsor shall provide all necessary supplies and services, including portable toilets, trash receptacles, trash control, traffic control equipment, support police services and other items as required, at their own expense. 4. Sponsor shall notify, in writing (this is being accomplished by McMillin Communities), all residents and businesses that will be affected by the event, no later than Tuesday, September 3, 1991. This shall include all homeowners and tenants on Calle Florecita, Bayonna Loop, and in Belmonte Estates (off Las Estancias Drive). * 5. Sponsor shall provide a $250 cash deposit for clean-up. 6. Sponsor shall post street closure signs in the immediate vicinity 48 hours in advance. FISCAL IMPACT: None - the event sponsor shall pay all ci ty service costs associated with this event. *Residents of the area were sent notices on August 22, informing them that Council would be considering this request at the August 27, 1991 meeting. Attached is a copy of that notification letter. [derby] 3 8---3 z~ ~~~ L~: ---.;~-- ---- --- CllY Of CHUlA VISTA PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT August 22,1991 Dear Neighbor: The Chula Vista City Council will be considering a request from the Bonita Orange Crate Derby Committee to conduct a two-day event along Rancho del Rey Parkway, between Calle Florecita and the west end of Bayonna Loop on September 21 and 22, 1991. (See .map on Reverse). . The event will require the closure of Rancho del Rey Parkway from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on both days. There will be additional traffic on Calle Florecita and Bayonna Loop during the event as spectators and participants come and go from designated parking areas. Council will be considering this request at their regularly scheduled meeting on Tuesday, August 27, 1991, at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers at 276 Fourth Avenue. You are welcome to attend this meeting and comment on this request if you wish. Please me at 691-5071 if you have questions regarding this notice. Sincerely, ~~ \ John H. Gates Special Events Coordinator ODERBY 8-5 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5071 -,"-~_..-,,_.~-_..,.,. "~-,,---~-,......_..,"._.- / . .. C;-I ...f.'itw, i\ / \~t .. It \... it . .. .... as .. -- . ,.s:~l . (... \ t\! , , , ,.i , \\ , r" r \ T .. I , .. i .c . . " .. , I fit ~ .. . , .... .. . , , , . .0 . .1. 0 , '" - ~, ;t .... . iJ .. . tf'~ i -n J . 1 -~ .,. .. I -- ~ . .. .[ = r: I ~ .. I. ..-~ .. . r \t ~ ~ \ r s- o .-' . . - - . . - - - - ." - 0J May 2 1, 1 9 91 Mr. John Gates Sr. Recreation Supervisor, City of Chula Vista Dear Mr. Gates, As per our conversation of May 14, please accept this letter as the formal request to hold the XII Annual Orange Crate Derby, within the boundries of the City of Chula Vista. Enclosed, you will find a plot map, detailing the specific roadways and adjacent properties to be used. As you are aware, the Orange Crate Derby has been held on Briarwood Rd., in the Bonita area for the past eleven years. Due to increased traffic flow and a number of other constraints, the Derby Committee believes that a change in location is imperative. At this point in time, we are sponsored by McMillin Communities, with additional support from the Phair Corporation and the Bonita Valley Lions. We are currently negotiating insurance coverage with Great American Bank and/or Wells Fargo Bank. As with the Sunnyside Saddle Club, we would like to hold formal discussions with the City, regarding the amount of insurance coverage necessary for our event. Please review the enclosed plot map. I look forward to an opportunity to present this proposal to the City Council, with a positive recommendation from your department. Sincerely, Jim Williams Chairman, Orange Crate Derby &-, NOTES: 1. The proposed sites covers approximately 2/10 of a mile on Rancho Del Rey Parkway, between the locked construction gate at the west end and Avenida Del Rey. 2. The south side of the roadway has a set-back fence (appx. 301), with a meandering sidewalk and is fully landscaped. This area will be used for spectators. 3. Races will be run down the center of the road, using the existing yellow lines to define the race lanes. Hay bales will be appropriately placed for the protection of participants and spectators. 4. All event parking will be on the road surfaces and graded lots along Bayonna Loop. Entry and exit traffic will be via Calle Floricita, to Bayonna Loop. 5. Event and overnight security will be provided by McMillin Communities. 6. Entry and exit for residents (currently one family) in Belmonte Estates will be accomodated as necessary and without delay. 7. Bonita Valley Lions will provide a food booth, serving hot dogs, drinks, and snacks. Location of the booth is currently at Bayonna Loop and Rancho Del Rey Parkway, midway between start and finish lines. 9-7 / i-i DATE: ~ - ':\ - ~ \ TO: Keith Hawkins, Police Department Diana Levin, Risk Management Hal Rosenberg, Traffic Engineering Greg Alabado, Transit Harlan Wilson, Public Works Jerry Foncerrada, Parks Division FROM: John Gates, Recreation Division ~ SUBJECT: Special Event Request Please review the attached request to conduct a special event. Notify me in writing or at extension 3189 if you need clarification or if you identify specific problems or areas of concern regarding the event activities. Your input will be included in a council report. If you do not note concerns or problems, you do not need to respond. Thank you JHG/tb 8-a RESOLUTION NO.~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY CLOSURE OF RANCHO DEL REY PARKWAY ON SEPTEMBER 21 AND 22, 1991 FOR AN ORANGE CRATE DERBY, UPON CONDITIONS The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the Bonita Orange Crate Derby Committee is requesting Council to authorize a temporary street closure and grant permission to conduct an Orange Crate Derby on Rancho del Rey Parkway on Saturday and Sunday, September 21 and 22, 1991; and WHEREAS, staff recommends approval subject following conditions: to the 1. The sponsor shall submi t proof of insurance in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy endorsement for $1 million, naming the City as additional insured. 2. The sponsor shall execute the standard hold harmless agreement. 3. The sponsor shall provide all necessary supplies and services, including portable toi lets, trash receptacles, trash control, traffic control equipment, support police services and other items as required, at their own expense. 4. Sponsor shall notify, in writing (this is being accomplished by McMillin Communities), all residents and businesses that will be affected by the event, no later than Tuesday, September 3, 1991. This shall include all homeowners and tenants on Calle Florecita, Bayonna Loop, and in Belmonte Estates (off Las Estancias Drive). 5. Sponsor shall provide a $250 cash deposit for clean-up. 6. Sponsor shall post street closure signs in the immediate vicinity 48 hours in advance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds the temporary closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons using the street during 8..;..1C( the temporary closure, and does hereby authorize temporary closure of Rancho del, Rey Parkway on September 21 and 22, 1991 for an Orange Crate Derby subject to the conditions listed herein. Presented by ~ form by ~ Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation 9220a Attorney -2- 8"" It) COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Item--i- Meeting Date 8/27/91 Report on Chula Vista Transit (CVT) Radio Communication Study Director of Public ~ork~ City Manager JC1 bl,6~r (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~) On November 7, 1990, SCOOT Board approved an agreement between the Ri chter Group and SCOOT for a radio communication study on CVT. Phase I of the study was to assess and evaluate the current radio communications procedures used by CVT and to develop recommendations whether to continue the present procedures or to change the current system. Phase II of the study, which would be conducted only if a change were recommended under Phase I, would require the consultant to assist Transit staff to prepare specifications for new radio equipment, to obtain an operating frequency, and to oversee the procurement and installation process for new equipment. Phase I of the study, which is attached for Council's information, is completed. Phase I recommends that SCOOT obtai n its own ope rat i ng frequency and upgrade its radio communications equipment. The maximum estimated capital cost for the equi pment upgrade and Federal Communi cat ions Commi ss i on (FCC) frequency licensing is $64,000; however, the recommendation would result in an estimated annual operating cost savings to SCOOT of about $3,000. The City's Senior Electronic Technician has reviewed and concurs with the study recommendations. Dr. Henry Richter is present to answer any questions Council may have. RECOMMENDATION: That Council recommend the following to the SCOOT Board: 1. That SCOOT Board accept the recommendations of Phase I of the Radio Communications Study and direct the Richter Group to conduct Phase II; 2. That SCOOT Board submit an amended FY 1991-92 Transportation Development Act (TDA) 4.0 Claim to SANDAG and MTDB in the amount of $71,800, ($7,800 as consultant cost for the Richter Group to conduct Phase II and $64,000 in capital cost for radio equipment procurement related costs). BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSS ION : Under current CVT radio communications procedures, radio equipment on the buses is owned by SCOOT and the SCOOT Contractor (ATC Management Corp.) leases space on a community repeater frequency at a cost of approximately $3,600 per year, or about $11 per bus per month. ATC also has a maintenance contract with a local communications company at a cost of about $2,200 annually. Therefore, the total annual operating cost for the present system is approximately $5,800. This cost is included in the Scoot/ATC contract. f-I Page 2, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 The major disadvantages to the present system are: Sharing a frequency with other users results in periodic communications delay between drivers and dispatcher. This lack of immediate access could be critical in an emergency situation. By operating on a shared frequency, CVT has no control over the number of other users; therefore, the frequency coul d become more crowded in the future and present increased communications difficulties. The cost to lease space on a community repeater frequency is about $3,600 annually, or approximately $130 per bus annually, compared with an estimated annual cost of $1,500 for CVT site rental of its own repeater. The advantages of CVT obtaining its own operating frequency and upgraded radio equipment are: Any communication delays between driver and the dispatcher or road supervisors would be eliminated. Future system growth woul d be accommodated wi thout the uncertainty of operating on a community repeater. On a capital cost bas is, 13 of the present rad i os (or about half of the radios) are almost 8 years old and are nearing the end of their useful 1 He. Therefore, replacement of the rad i os, wh i ch is about $32,000 or half the total capital cost of Phase I, would need to be done over the next few years. Also, in conjunction with the new radios, it is proposed to include a "transit package" which provides silent communication between driver and dispatcher, and other features i~cluding automatic transmitter identification, coupled with a silent alarm system for security purposes in the event of an emergency (discussed on page 11 of the study). The operating cost of a new system should result in a cost savings of at least $2,800 annually. Repeater site rental is estimated at $1,500, and maintenance should be a maximum of $1,500 annually but will probably be less during the first few years when the equipment is new. In addition, if maintenance work is done on a time and materials basis, the City's Senior Electronics Technician has indicated that much of the maintenance work could probably be undertaken by City technicians, with SCOOT reimbursing the City for these services. If Council and SCOOT Board concur with thi s recommendation, the new system could be in place and operational by Spring 1992. FISCAL IMPACT: The total estimated cost to implement a new communication system for CVT is $71,800, which includes $7,800 for consultant assistance and $64,000 for equipment procurement. The estimated annual operating cost of this new system is $3,000, or approximately $2,800 less than the current system. WMG:DS-028 WPC 1473T f-A COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 10 Meeting Date 8/27/91 SUBMITTED BY: Report: Request to conduct parade from Montgomery El ementary School Director of Parks and Recreati~ City Manager JGt ~~\ (4j5ths Vote: Yes_No-lLJ Montgomery Elementary School is requesting permission to conduct a school parade on October 11, 1991. ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: RECOMMENDATION: conditions. That Council approve the request subject to staff BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DI SCUSS ION: The principal of Montgomery Elementary School has requested permission to conduct a school parade on October 11, 1991, from 12:45-1:45 p.m. (Attachment A). The parade commemorates El Dia De La Raza (Columbus Day). The proposed parade route is i ndi cated on the attached di agram (Attachment B). Students from the school will participate, along with clowns, a marching band, and possibly a unit from the Fire Department and the Police Department. Approval should be subject to the sponsor meeting the following conditions: 1. Provi s i on of a cert ifi cate of insurance and pol icy enforcement in the amount of $1 million, naming the City of Chula Vista as additional insured. 2. Execution of a hold harmless agreement. 3. Provision of adequate traffic control as determined by the Police Department. FISCAL IMPACT: None. WPC 1690R 10-1 @ Chula Vista Elementary School District John J. Montgomery Elementary School 1601 Fourth Avenue. ChuJa Vista, California 92011 . 619422-6131 Ruben Castaneda. Principal ~Jllrle 26, 1991 Manuel Mollinedo Director, Parks & Recreation City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue (;11uL:.1 Vist.a, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Mol1inedo I '."ould like to x'equest. a Parade Permit for M'ont.gorne-ry Element.ary 3chool! S 16th annual Dia de 1a Raza/Columbus Day Parade. I have asked our ;:;c~hool dL3trict.' ~3 business office t.o send you a letter showing our liability insurance CO"lerage as required for this perroi t.. The parade will take place Friday, October 11, 1991. Step-off time will be 1:2:45 p.m. The pa=ade route and information regarding the significance of this day a~~ attached tD this letter. Each classroom in the school will represent a Latin American CountTY and \",111 march as a unit. in t.he parade. We hope to have police units and a fire engine from the Chula Vista Fire Department. The parade should last about 45 minutes. If you have aDY fu:rt.her quest.ic)t1s, pleas8 cont:ac.t. me at Montgomery Elementary School, 422-6131. Sincerely, :Ruben Cast.a11eda Principal ene.: Parade Route Holiday Hist.ory ee: John D. Goss, City Manager Tim Nader, Chula Vist.a Mayol~ Carol Gove T Chu1a Vist.a Fire Department. Lt. Ross Withers, Reserve Advisor, CVPD John Linn, Assistant Superintendent, Business, CVESD Dr. John Vugrin, Superintendent, CVESD Mary Helvie, Conmmnicat.ions, CVESD pc: jv 10 - ~ EL DIA DE LA RAZA/COLUMBUS DAY {Jrl (;c -'c()l)f;"}~" 12, l)t.~'-.:! r:.l.i. (~~ () 1. c-l--~:,:~. ~~ ri211 i::) 1-1 -_.;:.~ ,pe a}'::ing corruflemorate El Di.B de 1_2 RaZ2, or th0 da~! of the race. 13 J-zrluvlTl 2S C()1"lllnl)u5 f).3Y irl ()1..LC c~.()'ur~-t]~"'~l. world Thi::=:, da'/ Cristobal Colon (Christopher Columbus), sailing under the flag of Spain, landed in the New World on October 12, 1~92. Colon, an Ita.1J.a:t1 by birth "-Tho lived for a time in Portugal, opened t.he navigational r01.J:tes bet.Visen Europe and t.ne Americas and aided future European settlements in the Western Hemisphere. In almost. all of South America and a good portion of North America, the Spanish language and civilization took hold and intermingled wit,h the native cultures. New ideas, natural products, and sciences were introduced to both worlds. The communication bet.'\>leen people resul t.ed in wider knowledge and the blossoming of new ,,,ays of thinking and acting. El Dia de 1a Raza is celebrated as a holiday in most parts of the Spc?nish - speaking \..Jorl d as a bcnd of brctherhood and ccmlIT',on heri.tage. In t~hese areas, t:he day is celebr;:;.t.ed '\>;i th speeches, fes.t:ive parades and prog.L'ams. Throughout the :3pan.ish-speaking vlOrld "el ala de 1a raza", October 12, is like a huge birthday par.ty. It lS a time .to recall the unity and herit:.age as \l7ell as focus on the future. October 12 - Columbus Day here in the United States and Dia de 1a Raza in Latin Anlerican countries - is celebrated with parades and programs commemorating t.his day. October 12, 1492, '(.;as the day when the European cuI t:ure, brought by Columbus, merged \.<Tith the be2.utiful culture of the native Americans or Indians. The merging of these two cultures marIes the birth of the :r-mSTI ZO race. JO-3 ~ .' . -- v1ontgOmeryl' School i i L GTAY SCHOOL r>----- 1 Albany Ave. I I ~ I I 1 t ~ I L- Third A ~ ~ t _~__~nue ------~- b I +' (f} I ~ r I .J ~ ! I cn E o I~ I +) I . r-l ~ ill L'1 w , r- --.... __J n ~ cr W CJ ri- ......i '-'- (""y I ' ~L- ([ U_ t ~ )IJ -1 @ DATE: '~6- '\\ FROM: SUBJECT: Keith Hawkins, Police Department Diana Levin, Risk Management Hal Rosenberg, Traffic Engineering Greg Alabado, Transit Harlan Wilson, Public Works Jerry Foncerrada, Parks Division John Gates, Recreation Division ~ Special Event Request TO: Please review the attached request to conduct a special event. Notify me in writing or at extension 3189 if you need clarification or if you identify specific problems or areas of concern regarding the event activities. Your input will be included in a council report. If you do not note concerns or problems, you do not need to respond. Thank you JHG/tb /0 -5 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1L- Meeting Date 08/27/91 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Regarding rate increase request for refuse collection services Resolution "~I Approving rates for collection and disposa\ of refuse effective July I, 1991, and establishing a Waste Management Trust Fund Ordinance RCf7~ Amending Ordinance No. 1993 clarifying methodology for calculating future rate increases to collect and dispose of refuse SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finapce~ City Attorney \0\'<""\:.':> ' REVIEWED BY: Ci ty Manage"'-.l\ ~~ (4/5THS Vote: Yes___No-X-) This is continuance of a public hearing from the City Council meeting of August 13, 1991, at which time the Council discussed the current rate increase request from Laidlaw Waste Systems, a proposed redistribution in the amount of $305,000 and the establishment of a Waste Management Trust Fund. Attachment Five is a copy of the August 13 staff report. Council deferred action at that meeting and requested staff to return to tonight's meeting with additional information. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Adopt the resolution approving the appropriate rate schedule to be effective July I, 1991 and approving the establishment of a Waste Management Trust Fund. 2. Place ordinance which will clarify future rate calculations on first reading. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Following discussion at the public hearing on August 13, Council directed staff to return with additional information on the following specific issues: 1. Cost of Staff Time to Complete Negotiations To calculate this cost we have reviewed the meeting calendars of the staff involved in the negotiations, determined the )(- r Page 2, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 number of hours involved in meetings and preparation work for meetings, applied the appropriate hourly rate, and included a full cost recovery factor. This results in an estimated staff time cost of $7,028. In addition, Deloitte & Touche has been paid $5,000 for the services they have provided in calculation of rates and reviewing financial information provided by Laidlaw. In terms of recovering these costs, in the past it has been assumed that the costs associated with City administration of the franchise have been covered by the franchise fee revenue which is approximately $500,000 annually. 2. Disposal Rates if Redistribution Occurs Over 2 Years Instead of 3 Years Attachment One is a summary of the various scenarios that indicates the impact on rates of having or not having a Trust Fund, redistributing over 2 years or 3 years, and keeping the franchise fee at 7.0% instead of increasing to 7.5%. Scenarios 3A & 3B, and 4A & 4B, indicate the impact on rates of spreading the redistribution over 2 years instead of 3 years. For example, if you compare scenario 1A to 3A, the only variable being the number of years of payout (3 years vs. 2 years), then the resulting monthly residential rate is $11.20 vs. $11.14, a $0.06 difference. 3. Disposal Rates with and without Proposed Waste Manaqement Trust Fund Referring to Attachment One, if you compare scenario 1A to 2A, the only variable being whether or not there is a Trust Fund, the resulting residential rate is $11.20 without a Trust Fund versus $11.25 with a Trust Fund. 4. Disposal Rates If Franchise Fee Remains at 7.0% and is not Increased to 7.5%. On Attachment One, Scenarios 1B, 2B, 3B, and 4B indicate the resulting disposal rates if the franchise fee remains at 7%. The difference in monthly residential rates that would result from keeping the franchise fee at 7% ranges from $0.05 to $0.06. 5. Assurance That Interest Component is Included An interest rate equal to the City's annual investment earnings rate was included in the calculation to arrive at the amount of $305,000 to be redistributed. )( -.:l Page 3, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 Interest will also be computed on the balance to be redistributed in the second or third year. 6. Percentaqe Increase in Laidlaw's Operating Costs Compared to CPI Increase Attachment Three is a letter from Laidlaw indicating that their operating costs for the previous year have increased by 8.79 percent. However, in accordance with the Franchise Ordinance, their request is for a 6.0 percent rate increase for the operating cost component based on the change in the consumer price index. Coincidentally, the Franchise Agreement also limits the annual CPI increase to a maximum of 6.0 percent. The Franchise Ordinance, as approved by Council in 1985, does not require that Laidlaw document increases in operating costs in order to receive the annual CPI increase. Council felt that it was not necessary to audit and analyze Laidlaw's financial records and reports each year as long as a reasonable control for rate increases was provided. Council felt comfortable that linking rate increases to CPI with a not to exceed maximum of 6 percent per year provided reasonable parameters. As additional protection, the Council establ ished procedures whereby it has the option of calling for a public hearing at its sole discretion to discuss rate increases. What was not totally predictable in 1985 was the crisis in landfill area, the related large increases in landfill fees, and the additional fees necessitated by mandatory recycling. These have added significantly to disposal rates. 7. City's Authoritv to Defer Franchise Fee Attachment Four, Laidlaw Franchise Ordinance (as amended), Section 4, stipulates that the City franchise fee shall increase by one-half percent each year until it reaches a maximum of 10%. The fee is scheduled to increase to 7.5% as of July 1, 1991, as part of the pass through rate increase requested by Laidlaw. The City Council has the authority to amend this section by Ordinance since it does not materially impact the obligations or the ability to perform by Laidlaw. For example, Council could direct staff to return with an Ordinance amending section 4 to stipulate that the one-half percent increase scheduled for 1991 not take place, and that the franchise fee increase by one-hal f percent each year beginning in 1992 until it reaches a maximum of 10%. The effect would be no franchise fee increase in 1991 and the u--:s Page 4, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 maximum 10% would be reached one year later than previously scheduled. Recommended Redistribution Attachment One summarizes the different rate analysis scenarios as requested by the City Council. staff recommends Scenario 2A which (a) establishes a Waste Management Trust Fund, in the amount of $50,000, (b) redistributes the balance of $255,000 back to the rate pavers over a three year period, and (c) increases the franchise fee from 7.0% to 7.5%. (a) Waste Management Trust Fund - Staff believe that establishing a Waste Management Trust Fund using seed money of $50,000 merits consideration by the City Council. The funds will be used, at Council discretiori, solely for activities relating to an integrated waste management program. Public education, whether addressed to residents, businesses, or local industry, is essential for the success of any integrated waste management program. Because the issues of source reduction, recycling and composting are new to everyone, education is the first step toward implementation of these programs. Sample educational materials that could be developed with monies from the Trust Fund include: A Guide to Source Reduction for Residents and Businesses; A Guide to Composting; a recycling program update, informing residents of the success of our recycling program (tonnages, energy and resource savings, etc.), the upcoming mandatory recycling ordinance; Guide to Procurement of Recycled Products; and additional recycling "how to" information. In addition, almost all grants require matching funds (e.g., County of San Diego, Technical Assistance Program; Department of Conservation Recycling Grant Program), in the form of "hard match", either capital or cash. Because the City does not have "recycling capital" (equipment, containers, etc.), our matching funds must be in the form of cash. By using the Trust Fund, the City will benefi t from programs that would otherwise be totally paid for through the General Fund or by the rate payer directly. The use of funds to hire part-time interns (relatively inexpensive, $5.50 to $8.00 per hour) I on a limited basis, would add additional staff to assist in program development, public education, special projects, etc., while not burdening the General Fund or rate payer. (b) Redistribution - under Scenario 2A, the balance of $255,000 will be used to mitigate rate increases for three years. sixty percent will be used in the first year to reduce rate increases and 20 percent will be applied in each of the second and third year. I( - ~ Page 5, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 since the redistribution will occur over future years (second and third year), interest to cover the future value of the money will be included in the calculation. This will help moderate future rate increases. (c) Franchise Fee increase to 7.5% Ordinance. - The franchise fee under scenario 2A will in accordance with the existing Franchise Alternative Scenarios Although staff recommendation is for Scenario 2A, there are also other scenarios, as summarized on Attachment One, that deserve discussion and consideration by the City Council. These scenarios include making the redistribution over two years instead of three years, redistributing the entire $305,000 with no Trust Fund, and maintaining the City franchise fee at 7.0 percent. The impact on disposal rates of the combination of these different variables is displayed on Attachment One. Council is provided with several combinations of choices to assist in your decision making process. Request for Rate Increase As indicated in Laidlaw's letter dated July 30, 1991 (Exhibit A to Attachment Five) they are requesting a rate increase for the following components: 1. A pass through of a 27.8 percent landfill cost increase imposed by San Diego County as of July 1, 1991. 2. A pass through of the increase in the Franchise Fee from seven percent (7%) to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) that is paid to the city of Chula vista. 3; An increase of six percent based on the most recent change in the Consumer Price Index. As indicated on Attachment One, the current family residential rate is $10.56 (including recycling). If the above requested rate increase was granted in full, it would result in a rate of $11.51 or a 9.0 percent increase. However, if the Council approves the redistribution method, scenario 2A as described above, the rate will increase to $11.25 for family residential or an increase of 6.5 percent. Commercial rates will increase 7.5 percent if the redistribution scenario 2A is approved. Countywide Rate Survey Included as Attachment Two is a refuse rate survey of 16 other )(- 5 Page 6, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 cities within the County. This survey has been slightly revised from the previous staff report. Staff have learned that Carlsbad increased its residential rate August 1 from $9.60 to $10.27 and commercial rate from $58.20 to $62.90. Also, EI Cajon's residential rate is $10.88 and not $10.28 as previously indicated. The data collected compares the residential rate (including recycling) and commercial rates for one 3 cubic yard bin picked up once a week. The average residential rate for the surveyed cities (excluding Oceanside because its rate includes street sweeping and administration costs) is $10.93 and the average commercial rate is $57.44. Approval of recommended scenario 2A with a resulting residential rate of $11.25 and commercial rate of $59.08 would place the City's rates at 2.9 percent above the County's average rates for both residential and commercial. However, as pointed out at the previous Council meeting, if other existing factors in Chula vista are taken into account, such as the senior citizen discount rate, the separate rate for trailer parks, the reduced rate for multiplexes, and the city's franchise fee, then Laidlaw's proposed rates are probably at or below the average of other cities. Conclusion It is being recommended that the recent rate increase request be approved effective July 1, 1991 as modified by the redistribution as described in scenario 2A. Future rate increase requests would also be modified by the appropriate offset until the redistribution is completed. Approval of the proposed rate schedule would place Laidlaw close to the average of other jurisdictions. Finally, approval of the staff recommendation will also provide limited funds for recycling and solid waste program needs aimed at the long-range plan of reducing waste and stabilizing disposal rates. Rate increases for any services provided are not popular. Staff would like to be able to indicate that another rate increase will not be needed for a long period of time. Obviously, that isn't the case. with the current landfill capacity crisis in the county, state, and nation, the cost of disposal in San Diego County could conceivably increase 20 to 30 percent per year for several years in the future. It is anticipated that these landfill disposal costs will continue to be passed through to the residential, commercial, and industrial generators of the waste. One major influence on rates is the current system of unlimited refuse collection. The City is interested in exploring a variable rate structure which would allow residents to control some costs by disposing of less trash and paying rates commensurate with the amount of trash put out for collection. Although this is not a change that can be made in a short period of time, staff intends to " - " Page 7, Item Meeting Date 08/27/91 seriously evaluate the opportunities and ramifications of a variable rate structure. The ordinance presented for council action also includes an agreement with Laidlaw to meet and confer with the City on the possibility of a rate structure change. Such a positive economic incentive to the individual waste generator is a favorable link to the benefits of recycling and source reduction. All of these activities would hopefully work toward stabilizing future disposal costs. FISCAL IMPACT: If Council approves the recommendation as outlined, the city will receive $50,000 to provide funding for future recycling and waste management program needs. The increase in the city's franchise fee from seven percent (7%) to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) generates approximately $30,000 additional revenue to the General Fund. If the redistribution method is approved, funds will be used to lessen the impact to citizens of future rate increases for three years. II II Four - Five - Rate Scenario Summary Rate Survey of other cities certification from Laidlaw Indicating Percentage Increase in Operating Costs Existing Laidlaw Franchise Ordinance Previous staff Report of August 13 Attachment One - II Two - II Three - " - 7 ATTACHMENT ONE -' c ... N 0 co -0 -0 ... '" N '" 0 - . ~ 0- -0 0 ..... ..... ... 0- -0 0- 0- ~ IU -' . . I- ::I: co co 0- co co co co co ... 0- IU C I- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" I . ! M M M M M M M M M M It ~ .... .... C ... 0 ... '" 0- ... 0- 0 '" -0 ..... - ~ N .- N .- ..... 0 N .- "': '" I- IU .... . . I- ::I: .- ..... ..... .- ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 ..... IU C I- .- ..... ..... .- .- ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Cl . ; M M tit M M tit M M M tit - en IU .... . IU Ie Ie Ie Ie en Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie - Ie '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" 0 0 '" II: . . . . . . ...: ~ IU ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... . IU C ... . ... en - en ~ ... .... '" Ie Ie Ie Ie C . 0 0 0 0 M Ie Ie Ie . tot ~ N N N N 0 0 0 0 C - .; - - - - - - l- N Ie Ie M Ie Ie Ie Ie IU a . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... ~ N N N N ,., ,., ,., ,., . ~ - - - - - c c ..... Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie Ie C I- Q, . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ -0 -0 -0 -0 ..... ..... ..... ..... I- IU ~ .... en l- . - c i > . c .... .... c en I- = - . a ::I: ~ 0 c ~ . - IU ~ ... IU . ~ c ,., ,., ,., ,., N N N N 0 I c Q, . .. ~ IU ~ I- en - ~ ICII . c ! .... - C I- - = I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l- . . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . - a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IU . - - - - - - - :z ICII I- It '" 11'\ '" 11'\ 11'\ '" 11'\ '" 0 - en c 0 0 '" 11'\ 0 0 11'\ '" - . en - ,., ,., N N ,., ,., N N I- 0. IU 0 M M M M M M M M ::I ::J . IU CD ~ . - U Illl: - I- 0. III - >- 0 - ICII w ~ . Illl: II = l- II ... . 0 :a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :z ?- M M 0 0 M M 0 0 II en It 0 0 0 0 ..... ... e: = c - - - g: 0 Illl: 0 0 0 0 I- '" 11'\ '" 11'\ ..... M M M M 0- e: 0- - 0 ..... -'I ,., - II w ..... e: :It 0 ::I ~ ., .... .. ::I 0 I- ., ... u w W II C CD C CD C CD C CD ... I- ... ..... ; N N ,., ,., ... ... ... C tlI 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: 'II: w Illl: Illl: ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :It 0 E ..... - - - - - - - w ::J co Illl: Illl: Illl: Illl: Illl: Illl: Illl: Illl: III Ii 0 C C C C C C C C III 0 0 :It :z :It :z :It :z :It :z w Q, e: w w w w w w w W I- 0 .- u u u u u u u u u C Illl: :IE 0.. III III III III III III III III Illl: 0.. . :a )1- <? en w - ~ - U Q W ~ C lIlC C A- I! u ~~ ",0. ceO en... ~O CIIl lIlC<- ...J = ~ :II C K III ~ ... <<I E QI lIlC QI QI ... QI III s::. U C < ... QI 0 III .... N N o CIO N 0 .0 tit p.... N o o 0 - tit .. III 0 <<I U o "tI U w "tI <<I .0 III .... ... < < A-O ...... lIlCQ. "tI. QI.... 11I01 o C VIII N o OQl EIIl ......- .os::. II'IU o C t"I< II'IC tit ~ 11'I 11'I ,., p... p... 11'I ~ tit tit CIO .0 II'I~ 00 -- tit tit ..... t"IH t"I olJJ 0> -C tit .0 0. ~ ~ o o _ - - tit tit C ... ::J .0 s::. III <<I z: ..... .. III <<I o U <<I III o a- lii Q o "tI .- 31 "tI <<I C .... o "tI U III .. W ...J III <<I .. o "tI "tI C o U III W .- C U C w QI 41 H'" s::. U <<I QI lD .... <<I ... QI Q. E N ~ o ~ CIO 11'I tit 11'I 0. o - tit o U "tI w <<I III QI :E <<I ...J .."tI QI C 41 <<I ... .. 11I01 C 0'- (jU C~ QI 41"': .. III III _ 0 ... 01 U C ..- . "tI Q. C QI'- IIlQlE Ql3I"tI lIlCCIl<<l N .0 N M N 0 ,... .0 o ~ .0 tit 11'I' N .0 . 0 o. N ,... .0 11'I tit tit .0 - o 0. - - - - tit o ,., - - tit tit o U "tI w .... < o ... c.:l C o E QI ..... >- .. u .... < ~C tit 00 11'I0 11'I ,., -- tit tit . 011 11'I o 01 0> -C tit C ... ::J .0 s::. III III :E ..... 31 <- < C CIlQl<<l ......... o ... .. ... UOQl III > L.. tn._ ....,.., CQI::J OU.... UOU ...)( .oa-. N 11'I o o 0. o 11'I o ~ - tit 11'I tit II . o lJJ 1"'1> tltC 11'I 11'I tit .0 0. 0. tit 0"" CIOCIO 1"'1- -- tit tit . 11'I II 0. olJJ 0.> tltC C ... ::J .0 s::. III < .- C ::) III o U ... <- U ...QI ...... III .. U U <<I ... + 0 O'lt: o 0)( N 11'I _N tit tit .0 - 11'I 0. o .0 tit CIO 11'I tit CIO 0. o - tit ~ - o - tit C ... ::J .0 s::. III < ATTACHMENT TWO ~ 11'I 0. . .. 11'I tit .0 11'I . o - tit :a III - "CI ... III ...J :a III - "CI ... III ...J ,.. - 0. ...... ...0 III,., ... ..... >-0 . 1Il -... :lI III .r.lIlC U.... ... N .... - I ,... ... N .... - I ,... ^ . .., o III 0.. . ... ~~ tit ... r: .... ^ . III -Ill 11'I41 . ... ::~ tit ... r: .... ^ 41 III III 41 ... U C N 0. . CIO 11'I tit ... N ,..: .... ^ 41 III III 41 ... ~ o N . - - tilt ... - . -0 .... :a III - "CI ... . ...J ^ - 0. .... - ~ 41 ... . IlIlIlC ... .~l >11I Ill&. -0 :lI ... .r.A- u.... o:S .... ... -... ~j Q1'~ ... ... ,.. IlIIIIC .GII:'-'- .~1!.2 > III <- llI&.t! - 0... 41 :lI"'~ U .r.A-llIen u.... c: 0. .- ,... 1"'1 U A- 3 8884'886 ATTACHMENT THREE LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS August 22, 1991 Lyman Christopher Director of Finance c;q of Ouda y,.. 276 Fourth Avenue Chula VISta, CA 91910 Dear Lyman: Per your request at our meeting on August 16, 1991 a review of operating cost increases incurred by Laidlaw for the twelve month perWd ended June 30, 1991 for Commercial and Residential operations at our Chula VlSta Division has been completed. Touzl costs (excluding Disposal Costs and Franchise Fees) incrf!ased 8.79% net of growth for the period. This increase was computed by comparing the total costs (excluding Disposal Costs and Franchise Fees) for the twelve montlu ended June 30,1990 and June 30,1991 for the Commercial Front Load and Residential lines of business. '1'hese costs incrf!ased by 10.68% for thai period. Growth for the period was computed by comparing the increased service provided for the twelve montlu ended June 30, 1990 and June 30, 1991 for the Commercial Front Load and Residential lines of business. The Commercial growth was caIcuIoJed by comparing the total monthly front load yards picked up for the periods and the Residential growth was calculated by comparing the number of residential units billed during the periods. Growth of 1.89% was achieved for the period. . The increase in costs due to growth of 1.89% was then deductedfrom the gross incrf!ase in costs of 10.68% to arrive at the total costs increase of 8. 79% net of growth for Laidlaw~ Commercial Front Load and Residential operations at our Chula VISta Division. cJ9~~ . Daniel P. Higgins Regional ControUer Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. cc: D. Cathcart D.Blind A.Purves C.Hoge 678 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 307, CHUlA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92010 (619) 427-n09 Recycled Paper II - Jt) ATTACHMENT FOUR LAIDLAW TRASH FRANCHISE ORDINANCE TO COLLECT AND DISPOSE OF REFUSE AND TO USE THE PUBLIC STREETS AND PLACES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR SAID PURPOSE Section 1. Definitions. Whenever in this ordinance the words or phrases hereinafter in this section defined are used, they shall have the respective meaning assigned to them in the following definitions (unless in the given instance, the context wherein they are used shall clear ly import a different meaning): (a) "Grantee" shall mean Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. and its lawful successors or assigns. (b) "City" shall mean the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation of the State of California in its present incorporated form or in any later reorganize.:: 1 consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form. (c) "Streets" shall mean the public streets, ways, alleys and places as the same now or may hereafter exist within said city, including state highways now or hereafter establishing within,said City. (d) "Gross Receipts" revenues received by disposal of refuse or materials. shall mean all gross operating Grantee from the collection and collection and sale of recyclable (e) "Recyclable Materials" or "Recyclables" shall mean newspr int, glass, aluminum and rr.atal cans, mixed plastics (to include PET and HDPE), and other such materials as mutually agreed upon in writing by the Grantee and the City, which are collected by the Grantee pursuant to Section 21. (o~.{J. IQ'13; cl'-lJO; dI,-+~1) Section 2. Purpose. -1- )I - \ I Section 3. Term. ATTACHMENT FOUR The franchise term shall be extended for the term of five (5) years from and after the current termination date of September 4, 1987 or until the state or some municipal or public corporation duly authorized by law shall purchase by voluntary agreement all property actually used and useful in the exercise of said franchise, or until said franchise shall be forfei ted for noncompliance wi th its terms as provided herein. In addition, the grantee shall have two five-year renewal options if the grantee is not in breach of this ordinance and has performed in the manner found satisfactory by the City. The five-year extension and the two five-year options are conditioned upon the grantee constructing a new operating service facili ty within the City of Chula Vista within fifteen (15) months of the adoption of this ordinance. Said facility including land and improvements to cost approximately $1.5 million. During such term, grantee shall have the exclusive right to collect and dispose of all refuse created, accumulated or produced within the City of Chula Vista. (ORD. jClQ..3; ~IO'-l) Section 4. Consideration. The grantee of said franchise shall during the term thereof pay to the City four and one-half percent (4-1/2%) of the gross annual receipts of said grantee. Cit~ is authorized to increase said fee up to a maximum amount of ten percent '<10%). Beginning April 1, 1986, the franchise fee shall be increased by one-half percent (1/2%) and one-half percent (1/2%) each year thereafter until it reaches a maximum of ten percent. It is understood that any increase in the franchise fee by the City shall be cause for the grantee to increase charges in order to "pass through" the cost of the franchise fee. (oR(). '<fq,J', <S) 104) SECTION 5. Reports, Dates of Payment and City Audit. The Grantee shall file with the Director of Finance of said City on a monthly basis commencing on August 1, 1982, and monthly thereafter, a duly verified statement showing in detail the total gross receipts of such Grantee during the preceding month or fractional month from the collection and disposal of refuse within said City. Grantee shall pay to said City within fifteen (15) days after the time of filing of such statement, in lawful money of the United States, the aforesaid percentage of its gross receipts for such month, or such fractional month, covered by such statement. Any neglect, omission or refusal by Grantee to file such verified statement or to pay such percentage at the time and in the manner specified shall be grounds for the declaration of a forfeiture of this franchise and all rights of Grantee hereunder. (oRD, /'iCG) -t1-1-1. _~:!'t""''\''5Z')''l'C~Jt'''';3'~j';'::~~;'''!''':d'''l:~~F,)~ ,.... . %. . 'i/':;'~1:>JXt/f5:\;:,:;,.:t';:,\:;::'>:<',--,:~,_,'",':,x;~:~,,:.::j~-:;'f:'(::>-;."\ ~,,' ';,-\;' ,'. ::,:;,,::{:t',~_,N~1W;-'" - '- - < ,., " ATTACHMENT Grantee shall comply with all laws and regulations of the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. Further Chapter 8.24 of the Chula vista Municipal Code is expressly made a part of this franchise and incorporated it herein by reference as if set forth in full. Grantee and C~ty agree to be bound by all SECTION 6. Compliance with Laws. FOUR provisions of such ordinance, or,any amendments thereto, or other ordinances that might affect the collection or disposal of refuse in the City. It is understood that said ordinances are intended to be minimum standards and that higher standards and regulations may be required under the franchise. (oRD- 1'l'i3) SECTION 7. Obligations of Grantee. Grantee undertakes and agrees, for the consideration hereinafter mentioned, to furnish: all labor, equipment, and vehicles (including adequate equipment and vehicles in a standby capacity to provide the service herein required in the event of a breakdown of equipment); insurance and bonds necessary to insure the efficient and timely picking up, collecting, removing and disposing of City refuse; and to collect, pick up, remove and dispose of, all refuse which is generated or accumulated by or upon all property within the City during the time that this franchise is in effect, except as herein otherwise provided and subject to and in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof. ." The collection and removal of said refuse by Grantee shall be, at all times during the term of this franchise performed to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his delegate who shall have the right to issue orders, directions and instructions to Grantee from time to time with respect to the collection, transpor- tation, and removal of refuse, the performance of Grantee's serVices hereunder, and the Grantee's compliance with the provisions of the ordinances of the City of Chula Vista as they now exist or may from time to time be amended, 'and Grantee agrees to comply therewith. Such collection and removal of refuse shall be done in a prompt, thorough, lawful and workmanlike manner. ...., Grantee shall submit a detailed plan of operation prior to beginning of his work pursuant to this franchise. It shall describe the routes to be established and shall contain details regarding servicing schedules, the equipment to be used, and alternate procedures to be followed in the event of severe weather or equipment failures. Grantee shall provide and maintain at his own expense, a solid waste collection system capable of providing service to all entities in'the City requiring, or required to avail itself of said service. Not less than one regular weekly collection shall be provided to each residential unit. Grantee shall provide bins as required for commercial custo~ers or whenever other customers -3- 11- 13 "-"'"~'"--"-"..~-----"""""-~_._--'-" "- I- ATTACHMENT FOUR of Grantee request~their use. Each bin shall be placed in an accessible, outside location on a hard surface according to individual agreement. Grantee shall provide collection vehicles and equipment in amounts adequate to perform in accordance with its operational plan. Initially, and throughout the franchise term, the average age of all regularly assigned collection vehicles must be not more than four (4) years, and all must be radio controlled. Collection vehicles, containers, and other contractor furnished equipment must comply with the standards set forth in the Chula vista l-lunicipal Code. All refuse collected by Grantee shall become the property of Grantee immediately upon the collection thereof, and shall be forthwith removed and transported by Grantee to an approved place of disposal, which shall be provided, arranged for or furnished by Grantee. In the event Grantee fails, refuses, or neglects to collect and dispose of refuse set out or placed for collection at the time and in the manner herein required, City may collect and dispose of the same or cause the same to be collected and disposed of and Grantee shall be liable for all expenses incurrred in con- nection therewith. Such remedy of City shall be cumulative and in addition to any and all other remedies it may have in the event of such failure, refusal or neglect of Grantee. The collection and disposal of refuse by City or by others as aforesaid shall not be deemed an election of remedies which shall preclude City from availing itself of additional remedies for Grantee's breach of contract. The following shall be considered legal holidays -for purposes of this agreement: New Year's Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. Any other days must have prior.written approval from the City. When a regularly scheduled residential collection falls on a legal holiday, the collection for that day and succeeding days of that week shall be rescheduled one day later. Holiday disruptions of commercial collections shall be handled in a manner mutually agreeable to the Grantee and individual customers. Grantee agrees to provide and maintain litter containers for the use of the general public for public areas such as plazas and rights-of-way other than parks and those publicly owned facilities maintained by the city as specifically designated by resolution of the city and to empty and dispose of the contents as necessary. ......... -4- J 1- Jlf ~..___~'"__._~_"'_;""".~'~"~.e_....--------'-' / . . ATTACHMENT FOUR Grantee shall prepare and furnish to all customers not less than four (4) days prior to the beginning of or change in service, schedules setting forth the days on which the collections shall be made. Notice shall be in such form as is first approved by the City Manager or his delegate. (ORt). /QCl3) SECTION 8. Disposal Requirements. Grantee shall be obligated as set forth hereinabove to provide for the collection and the disposal of all refuse within the City of Chula Vista~ provided, however, Grantee shall under- take the disposal of said refuse in accordance with specific direction of City if at any time during the period of this franchise, City shall determine that the public interest requires a disposal program differing from that which the Grantee has established. (Ol<.i). I'IQ..3 \ < . Section 9. . Rates for Collection. Ci ty and grantee mutually agree that the initial rate to be paid by the residents, industrial and commercial enterprises in the City of Chula Vista, shall be those as presently established by Resolution No. 11911, adopted on January 22, 1985. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista may at any time, by amending Chapter 8.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, establish a program for preferential rates for senior citizens or other classifications which are deemed to be in the public interest. Beginning on April 1, 1986, grantee may, upon filing a notice of intention forty-five (45) days in advance wi th the City Manager, increase rates subject to the following conditions and limitations: (1) The amount of the increase shall be limited by the percentage increase since grantee's last rate increase in the San Diego area Consumer Price .Index for all urban consumers as compiled by the United States Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics for the latest twelve-month period for which statistics are available. In no event shall the amount of the increase exceed six percent (6%) of the service rates. (2) In the event that the Consumer Price Index referred to in Paragraph (1) above shall no longer be published, then another similar generally recognized index may be substituted upon approval of the City. -5- , I I _- is ATTACHMENT FOUR (3) Annual increases shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Manager. The City Manager shall notify grantee in writing of approval of the increase within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of accurate and complete information satisfactorily supporting any increase requested in accordance with Paragraph (1) above. The City Councii shall have the unilateral right to require a hearing for any rate increase at its discretion. If the City intends to require a public hearing, it shall notify grantee within said twenty (20) day period. In the absence of any written communication from the City Manager or Council within said twenty (20) days to the contrary, the increase is deemed approved. (4) No more than one such increase may be implemented in anyone calendar year although grantee shall have at any time the right to submit a request to the City Council for additional rate relief at any time extraordinary expenses are incurred. (5) Where landfill charges are increased, grantee shall notify City of its intention to "pass through" said costs thirty (30) days prior to increasing its rates. The City Council shall have the option to require a public hearing on this increase at its discretion. If the City does not notify grantee of its intention to require a public hearing within the thirty (30) day notice period, grantee is authorized to increase rates. (OR() /qq,3-j ~/O-+) SECTION 10. Insurance and Performance Bond. Grantee agrees, at Grantee's own expense, to carry comprehensive public liability and automobile liability insurance coverage during the full term of this franchise, with City also named as an additional insured thereunder, covering liability for bodily injuries, death and property damage, arising out of or in connection with the operations of Grantee, under this franchise in an amount not less than $1,000,000 for injuries including death to anyone person and in an amount not less than $5,000,000 for any one accident or occurrence, and property damage in an amount not less than $200,000. Grantee further agrees to carry, at Grantee's own expense, workers' compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California. All of said insurance policies, or certificates thereof, shall be deposited by Grantee with the City Manager together with endorsements or statements from the insuring companies providing that such policies will not be subject to cancellation, modification or reduction of. the limits of the policy until ninety (90) days after written notice to the City by registered or certified mail. Such policies shall guarantee payment of any final judgment rendered against Grantee or the City within the coverage provided, irrespective of the financial condition of, or any acts or omissions of, said Grantee. All of said policies shall be subject to the approval of the City Attorney. -6- 11- Jf, . ATTACHMENt FOUR Grantee shall secure and dellver to City MC1Ildger a twelve (12) month performance bond in the amount of $1,000,000 to secure the full, true and faithful performnce of all their terms, obligations and conditions of this franchise on the part of Grantee. Grantee shall present said bond together with a certificate from the surety showing payment in full for such bond, to the City Manager prior to the commencement of operations pursuant hereto, and provide a one-year renewal and certificate of payment prior to the start of each year of this agreement. In the event of the termination or cancellation of the insurance or bond required hereunder or the failure of Grantee to provide such other insurance and/or bond as hereinabove provided, prior to the effective date of such cancellation or termination, this franchise may be suspended or terminated forthwith by City, by written notice thereof to Grantee. Any such suspension shall be for such period or periods as the City Manager from time to time may determine. No liability or obligation shall be incurred by City in favor of Grantee by virtue of any such notice or notices or from any such suspension or termination. In the event of such suspension or termination by City upon the failure of Grantee to secure and maintain on file said insurance and/or bond during the full term of this franchise, Grantee shall be liable for any and all damages suffered by City arising out of such suspension or termination. (OR{:). jqq-3) SECTION 11. Hold Harmless. Grantee of the franchise granted hereby shall indemnify, save and hold harmless, City and any officers and employees thereof against and from all damages, judgments, decrees, costs and expenditures which City, or such officer or employee, may suffer, or which may be recovered from, or obtainable against Ci ty, or such officers or employee, for, or by reason of, or growing out of or resulting from the exercising by Grantee of any or all of the rights or privileges granted hereby, or by reason of any act or acts of Grantee or its servants or agents in exercising the franchise granted hereby, and Grantee shall defend any suit that may be instituted against City, or any officer or employee thereof, by reason of or growing out of or resulting from the exercise by Grantee of any or all of the rights or privileges granted hereby, or by reason of any act or acts of Grantee, or its servants or agents, in exercising the franchise granted hereby. This hold harmless clause shall apply to any extension of the franchise. (ORO. JQq..3') ~IO'f) -7- J I ~47 <'__"_"~''''''_'~'_~'M_"~~'_'''''_'''''':'~_''^~''"='~'_~--''''-_~_ ._-'---,,"-~ SECTION 12. Obligations of City. ATTACHMENT FOUR Except as hereinafter otherwise provided, Grantee shall have the sole right to pick up, gather, and remove refuse generated by residential, ~n~ commercial, or industrial property within the City except as otherwise provided in Section 8.24.080 of the Municipal Code and any other amendments thereto by the City until such time as this franchise is terminated as herein provided. City will not let any contract to, or enter into any contract with, any other person, firm, or corporation for the performance of the services herein required to be performed by Grantee, except as expressly otherwise herein .provided, as long as this franchise is in effect. City shall protect Grantee's rights to such exclusive contract by proper ordinances, and by reasonable enforcement thereof. Grantee and Grantor hereby expressly except herefrom the picking up, gathering, and removal of refuse pursuant to a competitively bid contract between the Sweetwater Union High School District and an authorized City trash franchisee. (oRD. /qq..3') ~~~) SECTION 13. Miscellaneous. The failure of either party at any time to require performance by the other of a provision hereof, shall in no way affect the right of such party entitled to performance to enforce the same thereafter. Nor shall the waiver of either party ot any breach of any provisions hereof be construed to be a waiver of such provisions or of any succeeding breach thereof. . Any notice that may be given to Grantee under or with respect of this franchise shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to Grantee or to an officer of Grantee, personally or when sent to Grantee by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to Grantee at: . Chula Vista Sanitary Service 311 F Street P. O. Box 967 Chula Vista, Ca. 92012 City reserves the right to determine, in the exercise of its powers to provide for the public health and welfare, whether technological or other changes materially affect the necessity of or level of the service provided for hereunder, and, in such case, the level of service hereunder shall be adjusted by City, and this franchise shall be reviewed and revised according ly. lo~C, ,QQ3) SECTION 14. Forfeiture. This franchise is granted upon each and every condition herein contained, and shall ever be strictly construed against Grantee. Nothing shall pass by the franchise granted hereby to Grantee unless it be granted in plain and unambiguous terms. Each of said conditions is a material and essential condition to the granting of the franchise. If Grantee shall fail, neglect or refuse to comply with any of the conditions of the franchise -8- .."",,""r'~"'~'-""^"","'--~"'''' ''''"CI,''''''''.'l''''''~'" ~~.-. ?~.'""" "'''''lW!~f:~'ffi;'''''';-'' '~ granted hereby, and if such failure, neglect or refusal shall ATTACHMENT FOUR continue for more than thirty (30) days after written demand ~y the City Manager for compliance therewith, then City, by the City...., Council, in addition to all rights and remedies allowed by law, thereupon may terminate the right, privilege and franchise granted in and by this ordinance, and ~ll the rights, privileges and the franchise of Grantee granted hereby shall thereupon be at an end. Thereupon and immediately, Grantee shall surrender all rights and privileges in and to the the franchise granted hereby. No provision herein made for the purpose of securing the enforcement of the terms and conditions of the franchise granted hereby shall be deemed an exclusive remedy or to afford the exclusive procedure for the enforcement of said terms and conditions, but the remedies and procedure outlined herein or provided, including forfeiture, shall be deemed to be cumulative. (CRt). /qG-3) SECTION 15. Authority for Grant. Notwithstanding any other provision herein contained, this franchise is granted solely and exclusively under Sections 1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205 and 1206 of Article XII of the Charter of the City of Chula Vista and no other authority. (ORD. /qq3) SECTION 16. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective thirty days after its final passage unless suspended by a referendum petition filed as provided by law. (ot<(). /qq.,:3) SECTION 17. Publication Costs. The Grantee of said franchise shall pay to the City a sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for all publication expenses incurred by it in connection with the granting thereof~ such payment to be made within thirty (30) days after the City shall have furnished such Grantee with a written statement of such expense. (ORi). /qCU) ." Written Acceptance. SECTION 18. The franchise granted hereby shall not become effective until written acceptance thereof shall have been filed by the Gra~tee with the City Clerk. (ORO IQ'l.3) SECTION 19. Publication. The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to .be pub- lished once within fift"een (15) days a,fter its passage in the ..... Chula Vista Star News, a ne\'lspaper of general circulation published and circulated in said City. (01<0. JCjQ3) ___ .. ',I . -9- ,,- I~ ~ <_"","~~.~~_,~_,.__~_~",_.~"_",_,~",,__,,,,_~_,~~_"""""M...... ... ATTACHMENT FOUR Section 20. , Special Events. Grantee agrees to carrying out special appearance. (of<(). ~'o't) cooperate with the events to improve City in community Section 21. Residential Curbside Recycling Services Grantee agrees to implement residential curbside recycling services to all single familr homes as follows: A. Exclusivity The City grants to Grantee the exclusive right to collect Recyclable Materials deposited at the curbside of single-family dwellings in such containers (IIDesignated Recycling Container ": or al terna ti vely ( .Container II) as are herein required to be provided within the City limits, to include all residences receiving refuse collection and disposal services descr ibed in the following paragraph B. (1). This does not exclude duly licensed non-profit organizations and community groups from conducting recycling programs for the purpose of raising funds, nor does it exclude private individuals from selling or otherwise disposing of their own recyclable material. However, once materials have been placed at the curb ~n a Designated Recycling Container provided by the Grantee, the material (IIFranchised Recyclables.) becomes one of the subject matters of this grant of franchise. t~t~/~/t~~~t~~~/~/tl~~t/Alq/~~~~tt/~/t~~ t~titXln~/~~/~~~ttt~~~//Yd/~~//iiit~~~/~/~t l~//n~t//p~tt//~t//t~~//~tl~lri~X//t~t~~~//t~XX~ttl~n tt~f1t~l~~t B. Obligations of Grantee (1) Collection - Grantee shall collect and remove all Franchised Recyclables which are placed in a Designated Recycling Container at the curbside on public streets, from all single-family residences. Grantee shall collect the Franchised Recyclables once each week, regardless of weather conditions. t~ t~~//itti~t/~q~~~Y~1 Collection will be on the same day of the week as the regularly scheduled trash collection day. Grantee and " -10- II-JO ATTACHMENT FOUR Ci ty will mutually agree to any changes in _ collection day. Grantee will notify residents of any changes in the collection day by distributing a flyer no later than two weeks prior to the affected day. (2) Containers Grantee shall purchase and distribute recycling containers to be used by each eligible residential customer included in the program. The type and cost of container to be used, or changes of container type shall be approved by the City prior to purchase and distribution. Grantee shall retain ownership of the containers. Each residence eligible to participate in the program will receive one container. If Grantee determines that the volume of recyclable material exceeds the capacity of the one container, additional containers shall be provided at no cost to the resident. Replacement of containers that are stolen and/or damaged shall be made at no cost to the resident at Grantee' s discretion. Grantee will be responsible for keeping records and making them available to the City regarding additional containers requested, and the reason for the request, e.g. damaged, stolen, needed to handle residence recyclables beyond capacity of one container. (3) Transportation of Materials Grantee shall transport collected recyclable materials to a central collection point and shall retain responsibility for the sale of such materials in a timely and efficient manner, so as to yield the highest possible market value for the material. . (4) Missed pick-Ups - In case of a missed pick-up called in by a resident, Grantee shall, where possible, provide collection wi thin 24 hours. If unable to accommodate due to inadequate notice, the mater ials shall be picked up on the next scheduled collection day and resident is to be so notified. Information on missed pick-ups shall be logged by Grantee and shall be available to the City. -11- ll-,tt (S) Public Awareness Program - The Ci ty and the G~IT!lC~~ENT FOUR agree that a primary element in encouraging the Eublic to adopt source reduction and recycling habits is to demonstrate the cost of recycling versus the ultimate cost of not recycling. To that end, the Grantee will highlight in the Public Awareness Program, estimated savings expected in landfill costs as a result of recycling. The Grantee will prepare an Introductory Packet of information regarding the Citywide Single-Family Curbside Recycling Program, approved in advance by the City, and will distribute such packet with the recycling containers to each eligible residence. The packet shall include, but not be limi ted to: a) An informational brochure that details the program elements and descr ibes how they can participate; and --b) doorknob hangers or other methods encouraging use- of the recycling container and explaining the program. The Grantee will assist with media events, make presentations to community groups and businesses on an as needed basis, and attend County wide meetings related to recycling, speaking on the City's Curbside Recycling Program if needed. The Grantee also agrees to assist in developing incentives to increase participation and tonnage collected, and to encourage involvement of community and youth groups. The Grantee and the City agree that the main purpose of an aggressive public education program is to increase participation and diversion. Beginning in the second year, if, in the City's jUdgment, it is reasonably determined that the pUblic education effort has not resulted in high enough program interest, the Grantee will perform reasonable pUblic education activities at the City's direction at a cost not to exceed $.10 of the monthly billing. (6) Local Manager - The Grantee shall at all times during the term of this agreement have a local manager charged with the responsibility for supervision of the recycling operations and obligations of the Grantee. C. Obligations of City - The City shall have lead responsibility for directing the development and expenditures of the Public Awareness Program as provided in paragraph B.(S). The City also agrees to take such steps as may be reasonably necessary to protect recyclable materials placed at the curbside for collection by Grantee under the terms of this Agreement and shall deliberate upon the merits of enacting and reasonably enforcing an anti-scavenging ordinance. -12- II--J~ D. .. ot ~. . ... ATTACHMENT FOUR Funding and Rates for Collection (1) Funding Sources The residential curbside collection program will be funded by four sources: a monthly recycling fee to all eligible residents: revenue from the sale of collected recyclable mater ial: savings in disposal cost of material diverted from the landfill: and grant funds when available and awarded. (a) A monthly recycling fee charged to eligible residents is the primary source of funding for this program. -- In general, it will be allocated equally among the customer base receiving said recycling service and will be determined by the Grantee's operating expenses directly attributable to the recycling program, less: revenue received from the sale of collected recyclable mater ial, the savings realized in disposal costs of material diverted from the landfill, and application of grant funds. The Grante~ will use the billing system to demonstrate that material sales, landfill di version credi ts and grants reduce the program's operational costs. The purpose of providing this information is for the public to continue to see how diverting waste from the landfill as result of recycling produces savings. Specific fee information is outlined in paragraph D.(2) below. (b) All collected recyclable,m?terial will be sold at fair market value and revenues obtained from such sales shall be retained by Grantee as an offset against operating expenses. (c) Recyclable materials collected in the program will be diverted from disposal in the landfill, thereby resulting in a cost savings to Grantee (-Landfill Diversion Credit.). On a monthly basis, Grantee will determine the recycled material tonnage collected and the resulting Landfill Diversion Credit and will credit this savings during the first year of operation as an offset against operating expenses. - When reevaluating program costs in subsequent years, the Ci ty agrees to consider Landfill Diversion Credits of less than 100%. The amount will be subject to negotiation and the intent is to provide an economic incentive for the Grantee towards increased participation and program success. )1- b3 -13- ATTACHMENT FOUR (d) Any grant funds received will be appl ied to the costs of the program when award is noticed or during the next rate review procedure if the award takes place once a specific rate has been determined, with the intent of directly reducing the monthly fee to the homeowner. (2) Rates for Collection - It is the City's intent to ensure that the rates charged to the citizens for the recycling program are appropriate and equitable. Based on experience gained in the City's pilot curbside and other recycling programs, the recycling fee for the first period of operations will be $1.10 per month, billed quarterly in the same manner as the trash collection fee. The monthly fee of $1.10 per residence will be the established fee for the period beginning February 1, 1991 ~hrough March 31, 1992. ... Specific rate review procedures will be prepared by the City and will be used with the concurrence of the Grantee in consideration of all requests for rate adjustments by the Grantee. Rate review will include adjustments for actual sale of materials and landfill diversion credits in previous period compared to original estimated amounts. Shortfalls or overages will be used in determining rates for upcoming periods. Rate review will be conducted annually beginning in January 1992, and will be concluded prior to the notification deadline for the 45 day notice of the annual CPI increase for refuse collection as referenced in Section 9 of the franchise as amended -by Ordinance No. 2104, Rates for Collection. An increase in rates for recycling services will be subject to the same limitations and conditions for refuse collection rates listed in Section 9. -. , By amending Chapter 8.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City may establish a program for preferential rates for senior citizens or other classifications which are deemed to be in the public interest. The program parameters and rate structure will be determined by the City with the concurrence of the Grantee which concurrence shall not be unreasonably withheld. ) 1- 3.tf -14- 0~''9'~'''<~ ?';"l't'C'~~;'" ., --. ';'PN"~;r:i~~~,: ,_~ 'i;:~; _"-~---rt":)1:~_1;'~{~0.;~:~j'~:'\~<:':y,"":';:>~'<'}IF"';_,'~k~f:-h',r:'~\kI;I::~lF~~:'i~~';~!~i::',~~:,~~!~ ~ ATTACHMENT FOUR All changes to a preferential rate will be subject to the rate review and notification procedures referenced in this paragraph as well as the limitations and conditions for refuse collection rates listed in Section of Ordinance No. 2104. E. Reports - Grantee shall file with the City written quarterly and annual reports of Grantee's performance under this agreement as follows: (1) Quarterly Project (15) wor king days quarter, Grantee project report to to the following: Reports Within fifteen after the last day of each shall submit a quarterly include but not be 1 imi ted (a) Summaries of tonnage of all recyclable materials recovered, by material. (b) Summar ies of tonnages of all recyclable materials sold, by material. (c) Market price for all recyclable materials collected from the curbside and sold by Grantee. The weight receipts shall be available for inspection by the City. (d) Resident participation rates in terms of weekly set-out counts. ;' (e) Overall assessment of performance dur ing the quarter. (f) Discussion of problems and noteworthy experiences in program operation. (g) Recornmenda tions to increase tonnage.-of recyclable materials recovered. (2) Annual Report - On or before July 31 of each year of the term of this agreement, Grantee shall submit a fiscal year-end annual report to include but not be limited to the following: (a) A collated summary of the information contained in the quarterly reports, and a summary of the participation rates and tonnages of recovered material. "-~ -15- ~-----:.-~~..........:~.~......;,.;..,..;,.,.~>.--, - ATTACHMENT FOUR (b) A report of public awareness acti vi ties and their impact on participation and recovered volumes. (c) A report of highlights and other noteworthy experiences, measures taken to resolve problems, increase efficiency and household participation. (d) Additional information as necessary to meet state and/or Federal mandated reporting requirements. F. Performance Standards - This Agreement for curbside recycling services is subject to the performance standards and franchise conditions detailed in Section 14 Forfeiture of the franchise, (Ordinance No. 1993). While it is the intent of Section 21 to describe specific recycling collection services to be provided by the Grantee in addition to existing refuse collection and disposal services, Grantee agrees that acceptable performance of recycling services will be considered severable from this agreement. ... G. Additional Franchise Fee - The Grantee, as part of the consideration of this agreement, agrees to pay to the Ci ty an addi tional franchise fee at a rate consistent with that paid for refuse collection and detailed in Section 4 Consideration of the franchise, as amended by Ordinance 2104. This rate will begin at seven percent (7%) of the annual receipts collected by said Grantee within the City of Chula Vista from residents for the recycling program within the City. Beginning April 1, 1991, the franchise fee shall be increased by one-half percent (1/2%) and one~half percent (1/2%) each April thereafter until it reaches a maximum of ten percent. It is understood that any increase in the franchise fee by the Ci ty shall be cause for the Grantee to increase charges in order to .pass through" the cost of the franchise fee. H. Term - It is the intent of the City that the term ~the provision of Residential Curbside Recycling Services shall be to the year 2002, subject to a two year notice of cancellation by the City without cause which cannot be tendered sooner than the end of the third year. The services remain cancellable for cause at any time. 'c. . If - J.?, -16- ATTACHMENT FOUR I. Recycling Program Expansion It is the City's intention to develop a comprehensive recycling program to reduce the amount of material being disposed of in County landfills and to comply with the mandates of the California Integrated waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Both parties hereby agree that the City may not go out to bid for the expansion of this recycling program to other land uses (e.g., multiple family, commercial, industrial) or other recyclable materials (e.g., yard waste, etc.) until after the City has met and conferre~ with Grantee with regard to its intent to do so. ~ separate amendments to the agreement for refuse ~co1lection and disposal are not negotiated between the 'City and the Grantee, the City may go out to separate bid. (ORt). ~t..J.IO j ~L.lol1 i ~<-f clq) " Ordinance No. 1993 adopted August 3, 1982 Ordinance No. 2104 adopted March 5, 1985 Ordinance No. 2332 adopted September 12, 1989 Ordinance No. 2410 adopted October 16, 1990 Ordinance No. 2427 adopted November 27, 1990 Ordinance No. 2429 adopted December 4, 1990 II ' Jt RESOLUTION NO. 16301 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING, AFTER PUBLIC HEARING, RATES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1991 AND ESTABLISHING A WASTE MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND WHEREAS, in February, 1991, in accordance with the Franchise Ordinance, Laidlaw Waste Systems gave the City Notice of Intention to apply for a rate increase; and WHEREAS, the City and Laidlaw have agreed that there has been a rate overcharge, the present value of which is $305,000, and that all but $50,000 thereof should be returned to the ratepayers, and that $50,000 should be used for public purposes related to recycling and solid waste programs; and WHEREAS, the City Council called for a public hearing of the proposed rate increase; and WHEREAS, negotiating a revenues. ci ty staff and Laidlaw have spent several months rate increase and proposed redistribution of NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: section 1. The rates as indicated on Attachment One for collection and disposal of refuse are hereby approved, said rates to be effective July 1, 1991. section 2. establish, with Trust Fund to be waste programs. The Director of Finance is authorized to the aforementioned $50,000, a Waste Management used for activities related to recycling and solid section 3. This resolution shall take and be in full force and effect immediately upon the passage and adoption hereof. section 4. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original Resolutions of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption hereof in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. Lyman Christopher Director of Finance ;1;;;.ed as O;VY: Bruce M. Boo a rd City Attorne //- ~ //1-50 Presented by: ATTACHMENT FIVE COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item Meeting Date 8/13/91 Publ ic Hearing: Regarding rate increase request for refuse collection services Resolution Approving rates for collection and disposal of refuse effective July 1, 1991, and establishing a Waste Management Trust Fund Ordinance Amending Ordinance No. 1993 clarifying methodology for calculating future rate increases to collect and dispose of refuse SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance I' City Attorney REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-) Since 1986, Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc., in accordance with the Franchise Ordinance, has been entitled to request an annual rate increase for operating expenses to be effective with the April billing each year by giving the City a "Notice of Intention" no later than 45 days prior to the effective date. The "Notice of Intention" to apply for a rate increase that was received from Laidl aw in February 1991 triggered the City Council's interest for a more in-depth look at Chula Vista rates in comparison to the rest of the County. At that time, Council directed staff to set the matter for public hearing once the requested information was available. Due to the time necessary for the staff analysis and an independent review of past and current rates, Laidlaw voluntarily agreed to defer the effective date of the increase until July 1991. Subsequently, the County announced 1 andfi 11 di sposa 1 fee increases of 27.8% effective July 1, 1991 and Laidlaw amended the "Notice of Intention" to include a request for the pass through of tho~e disposal costs. (See Exhibit A.) This report addresses the current rate increase request from Laidlaw composed of a pass through for disposal costs, a pass through for the franchise fee increase, and an increase based on the Consumer Price Index. It discusses a recommendation for a current rate schedule to be effective July 1, 1991, an~ reviews the extensive analysis that has been performed and the rationale for the recommendation. It also addresses the methodology for calculating rate increases, suggests a redistribution in the amount of S305.000, and recommends establishment of a Waste Management Trust Fund. REC(lltENDATION: 1. Adopt the resolution approving the rate schedule to be effective July 1, 1991 shown in Exhibit B, and approving the establ ishment of a Waste Management Trust Fund. 2. Place ordinance which will clarify future rate calculations on first reading. BOARDS/C(lltISSIONS REC(lltENDATION: Not app 1 i cab 1 e. "- J6 ATTACHMENT FIVE .' Page 2, Item Meeting Date 8/13/91 DISCUSSION: The current procedure for rate review was established originally in 1986 and simplified what had previously been a more cumbersome process for annual review and public hearing. The current procedure allows for, among other things, a direct pass through of landfill cost increases imposed by the County of San Diego, as well as pass through of the City franchise fee increases of one-half percent (.5%) annually until 1996. The franchisee is also entitled to a rate increase up to the change in Consumer Price Index (but not to exceed 6%) to cover operational cost increases. The ordinance allows for the rate requests to be administratively reviewed by the City Manager's Office with notification to the City Council. The City Council may, at its discretion, require a public hearing for any proposed rate increase. The current ordinance language states that "the amount of the [rate] increase shall be limited by the percentage increase since grantee's last rate increase in the San Diego area CPI." Over the past year, staff has determined that Laidlaw was using a different methodology to implement rate increases than was intended by the City when the ordinance was adopted. Since 1986, the annual CPI increases effective in April each year has been applied against the exi st i ng rate wh i ch i nc 1 udes components for ope rat i ng costs, 1 andfi11 fees, and franchise fees. The proper calculation for annual CPI rate increases should only be applied on the component of the rate covering operating costs, and should not include landfill costs and franchise fees which are handled separately as complete pass through costs. The company has cooperated with the City in recalculating and comparing rate increases received since 1986. Laidlaw and City staff agree on an amount of $305.000 to be redistributed. This amount includes interest and is the result of several months of extensive discussions and negotiations with Laidlaw. The City's auditor, Deloitte and Touche, has provided primary assistance by independently reviewing the financial information from Laidlaw and assisting in the complex calculation to arrive at the $305,000. This amount represents the di fference between the amount of revenue (p1 us interest) received by Laidlaw since 1986 versus the amount of revenue they would have received if the annual CPI rate increases had been calculated as intended by the Franchise Ordinance. Staff does not believe there was an intentional miscalculation by Laidlaw. In fact, the annual increases have been approved at staff level and it was not until the most recent request for a rate increase that the City Attorney picked up on the fact that the annual rate increases were not calculated entirely in accordance with the intention of the Franchise Ordinance. Recommended Redistribution There are two alternatives suggested by staff and agreed to by the contractor for a possible redistribution of the $305,000. Both alternatives are based on 11- F( ATTACHMENT FIVE Page 3t Item Meeting Date 8/13/91 the assumption that the ratepayers should benefit from the redistribution amount. Both a 1 ternat ives propose to d i st ri bute the amount as a means of mitigating rate increases for three years. Sixty percent would be used in the first year to reduce rate increases and 20 percent would be applied in each of the second and third year. -This would lessen the impact of the rate increase in the fourth year once the entire redistribution has been completed. Both alternatives split the rate reductions between residential and commercial ratepayers in the approximate proportion of the original overpayments. Since the proposed alternatives extend the redistribution amount over future years, interest to cover the future val ue of the money will be i nc 1 uded in the calculation. Alternative '1 $305.000 (olus value of future interest) to be used to offset future rate increases over the next three Years. Alternative '2 $50.000 to be oaid immediately into a Waste Management Trust Fund and the remainina $255.000 (olus value of future interest) to be used to offset future rate increases over the next three Years. The staff recommendation is to approve the redistribution method proposed in Alternative 112. The additional aspect of this alternative is the establishment of a $50,000 Waste Manaaement Trust Fund. It is staff's reconvnendat i on that these funds be avail ab 1 e to be appropriated at Counc il ' s discretion for future recycl ing and sol id waste program needs which might otherwise be covered only by a General Fund appropriation or a direct rate increase. As Council is aware, the requirement for cities to establish active recycling programs will place most of the cost burden for operations directly upon the public. This relatively small trust fund could provide funds for waste -reduction activities such as: increasingly important public education campaigns; matching funds for recycling grants; work on positive economic incentives, such as variable rate structures; etc. Reauest for Rate Increase As indicated in Laidl aw' s letter dated July 30, 1991 (Exhibit A), they are requesting a rate increase for the following components: 1. A pass through of a 27.8 percent landfill cost increase imposed by San Diego County as of July 1, 1991. 2. A pass through of the increase in the Franchise Fee from seven percent (7%) to seven and one-hal f percent (7.5%) that is paid to the City of Chula Vista. 3. An increase of six percent based on the most recent change in the Consumer Price Index. II-~ ATTACHMENT FIVE Page 4, Item Meeting Date 8/13/91 As indicated in Exhibit C, the current family residential rate is S10.56 (incl uding recycling). If the above requested rate increase is granted, it will result in a rate of SI1.51 or a 9.0 percent increase. If the Council approves the redistribution method, Alternative '2 as described above, the rate will instead increase to S11.29 for family residential or 6.9 percent., Commercial rates will increase 7.2 percent if the redistribution method Alternative '2 1s approved. CountYWide Rate Survev The staff analysis also included a refuse rate survey with the most up-to-date rates for 16 other cities within the County (see Exhibit C). The data collected compares the residential rate (including recycling) and commercial rates for one 3 cubic yard bin picked up once a week. To summarize, the current Chula Vista rates for single family residential and commercial accounts are, respectively, 1.5 percent and 5.8 percent below the average rates throughout the County. Thi s is primarily because most contracts have recently been adjusted for operational, recycling programs, and landfill increases while the City's increase request from Laidlaw has been held pending this public hearing. The rate increase requested by Laidlaw (for operations, franchise fee and landfill fees) would place Chula Vista's rates above the County averages by 6.8 percent for residential and 2.8 percent for commercial. Approval of the recommended increase adjusted by the proposed redistribution would place the City's residential and commercial rates at 4.8 percent and .9 percent above the County's average rates. Conclusion It is being recommended that the recent rate increase request be approved effective July 1, 1991 as modified by the offset as described in Alternative lZ above. Future rate increase requests would also be modified by the appropriate offset until the redistribution is completed. Approval of the proposed rate schedule would place Laidlaw close to the average of other jurisdictions. Finally, approval of the staff recommendation will also provide limited funds for recycling and solid waste program needs aimed at the long-range plan of reducing waste and stabilizing disposal rates. FISCAL IMPACT: If Council approves the proposal as outlined, the City will receive S50,000 to provide funding for future recycling and solid waste program needs. The increase in the City's franchise fee from seven percent (7%) to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) generates approximately S30,000 additional revenue to the General Fund. If the redistribution method is approved; funds will be 'used to lessen the impact to citizens of future rate increases for three years. WPC 0631G JI- 3( - 84'8884'1 ATTACHMENT FIVE EXHIBIT 'A' REQUEST FOR RATE INCREASE LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC. July 30, 1991 Mr. Jolin Goss, City Manager City of ChulD VISta 276 Founh Avenue Chula VISta, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Goss: Further to our letter of Apri12, 1991 regarding Nodce of Intention to apply for a rate increase we are enclosing proposed new rate schedules effective July I, 1991. I nze new schedules have been arrived at following discussions with representatives of your Depanment as well as Mr. Bruce Boogaard, the City Attorney and Mr. Lyman Christopher, the Fuuznce Db-ector. The new rates have been calculated include the following adjustments: . 1. A pass-thru of a 27.8% landfill cost increase imposed by San Diego County effecdve July I, 1991. 2. A pass-thru of an increase in Franchise Fee Cost from 7% to 7.5%, paid to the City of Chula VISta. 3. An increase to cover the increase in other costs based on the change in the Consumer Price Index applied to the non-landfill, non-franchise fee component of the rate since April 1985. The most recent CPI change was 6%. The proposed rate schedules do not include any adjustments which may be agreed upon penaining to previously approved rates for the period since April 1985. qyou require any further information in order to approve new rates effecdve July I, 1991, please let me know. Sincerely, ~muuJ;fl{j Division Manager cc: · Mr. Lyman Christopher Mr. Bruce Boogaard Mrs. Stephanie Popek 11- so< P.O. BOX 967. CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92012 (819) 421.9400 FOLLOWING ARE DISPOSAL RATES THAT RESULT FROM EACH SCENARIO THE RATE SCHEDULE FOR THE SCENARIO APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL WILL BE ATTACHED TO THE RESOLUTION )1--3cf S c/ZN/f/-?{D lit LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS ccMli1ellclJCtL- CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JULY 1, 1991 SCENARIO . 1A :------MINIMUM------: :-------MAXIMUM-------: NO. NO. WEEKLY RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT BINS PICK UPS 6-30-91 7-1-91 6-30-91 7-1-91 ----------------------- --------------------- ----------------------- 1 1 $54.95 $58.92 $64.80 $69.05 1 2 $91.50 $98.94 $108.90 $116.82 1 3 $126.60 $137.46 $152.65 $164.24 1 4 $166.40 $180.82 $198.45 $213.76 1 5 $204.20 $222.12 $244.40 $263.43 1 6 $244.10 $265.58 $295.80 $318.71 1 7 $289.70 $314.89 $343.80 $370.49 2 1 $97.75 $105.36 $118.90 $127.10 2 2 $177.85 $192.59 $201. 70 $217.10 2 3 $235.55 $256.79 $273.65 $295.94 2 4 $304.95 $333.02 $352.30 $381.68 2 5 $381. 30 $416.39 $426.90 $463.25 2 6 $465.20 $507.52 $520.85 $564.71 2 7 $549.10 $598.65 $608.70 $659.90 3 1 $140.90 $152.16 $173.50 $185.66 3 2 $243.25 $264.70 $285.40 $308.02 3 3 $332.45 $363.73 $426.35 $460.23 3 4 $442.40 $484.09 $497.10 $540.30 3 5 $552.10 $604.18 $609.90 $663.58 3 6 $686.35 $749.51 $711.15 $774.99 3 7 $832.75 $907.32 $863.35 $938.77 4 1 $184.60 $199.52 $226.10 $242.17 4 2 $306.50 $334.61 $360.00 $389.59 4 3 $436.25 $477.77 $502.30 $545.64 4 4 $596.35 $652.11 $633.85 $690.65 4 5 $760.85 $830.98 $776.30 $846.85 4 6 $925.75 $1,010.25 $981. 25 $1,067.29 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,189.33 $1,145.85 $1,246.26 5 1 $225.80 $244.32 $276.25 $296.16 5 2 $392.00 $427.38 $441. 60 $478.36 5 3 $562.75 $615.13 $571.55 $624. 17 5 4 $741.35 $R10.94 $772.35 $842.79 5 5 $913.60 $1,000.22 $1,021.10 $1,110.70 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,194.23 $1,236.05 $1,343.86 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,433.92 $1,343.06 $1,466.10 6 1 $266.95 $289.06 $326.95 $350.72 . 6 2 $468.25 $510.65 $514.50 $558.18 6 3 $664.95 $727.52 $711.00 $ 77 4. 84 6 4 $857.15 $939.76 $929.20 $1,013.80 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,155.18 $1 , 184. 45 $1,290.83 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,384.63 $1,468.35 $1,597.31 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,632.79 $1,703.35 $1,853.54 11- 35 ..---....- <;; C E AI A7l./ 0 I IT: If. E51 oe:'1/TlA-~ mE: CYRESlA em OF CHUL~ VISTA aATE TABLE EFFECTIVE i-HI RESIDm IAl. FJTES e-20-91 SCEKARIC 1A YEAP. 1 DISPOSAL COST PEP. um CA~cu.mOk: TOTAL DISPOSAL com ACTUAL m (9-HC THRl HC-Il) TOTAL lump. OF ums AVG 1I0aTHlY DISPOSAL COST PEP. um LAIDFIU IKCP.EAS: I ~7.1X T+9~ lIomLY DISPOSAL COST PEP. um I 7+51 $1,012,512 41,317 sum $0.6813 $a.I31i } um -mU:T- MASH RATE ADJ um :--- DEDUCT ____: ;---- ADD --: lEV um :-- ADD ---or um RArt AIlJ um aATE AT RE:Ycm~ Rm AT mALe am ~T cmoSAL fRAlCHISE lET PER m I.CREASE nEW OISPSL RATE In FRRCHSE FEE RECYClIIli RAE AT ROCTl RATE AT 6-30-91 FEE f-3~-SI 2.5: ADJ Ho-tl COSTS FEES (1S) URIT RATE us) OF lET COSTS FF & RF 7.51 m 7+11 3.3~: 7-1-91 . ---..-------...-------------------------..---------------------------- SIIGLE fARIlY SlUE S1.1C SS.,S ($C.W .U2 $2.45 . .us 16.13 SC.37 $3.13 $9.63 $OJ8 $1.10 $11.51 (SC.31) $11.20 IIUm/FARIlY ums AFTER DIE EACH ADDITIOIAL um s; .91 sue SU! (SC.17) SU4 '~.45 '0.46 $3.72 ,D.22 $3.13 $7.08 $0.57 SI.10 $E.n ($C.22) $2.53 TRAIlEP. PARKS & IIams (mTRAL lCCmOK) IIIIIIlDN PER IIOITH Sl7 .73 (SU4) S11.2S S2.45 S1.21 SI3.63 SO.82 '3.13 $17.58 S1.43 suo S19.00 ($0.59) S1!,42 no TIllES WEEKlY St,24 ($0.16) SLOE .2.45 SO.43 $3.21 SC.19 S3.13 SU3 SC.53 SC.DO s7.0& lI0.21) SUE THREE TIllES WEEKlY S7 .90 ($C.20) '7.7C ".45 $t.54 SUI S0,22 13.13 $2.13 IC.n suo sUS (SO. 26 ) IUS FOUR TIllES WEEKlY SLH lSO.H) SU2 $2.45 SU5 U.13 sa.37 lSoU SUE SUB .ua SlU~ (SO.31) SIt.1C DAILY PICK UP (6 TIllES) fIC.BE (SCom SIUS 12.45 SO.74 SUt SU4 13.13 $IC.S7 SUS IC.DO $11.86 (IU6) $1: .5C mIlER PARKS (IlDIVrMl m SER'lICEl m um ORE commON mm !f.Bl ($t.m S!.6~ S2.45 .UE s3.12 SO.22 1~.13 ILDE se.57 sc.co $7.E5 (10.22) 17.43 TWC COllEtTIO~S WEEn y I:' to (Sc.23) $Eo!; $2.(5 sU2 $5.80 rr 12.13 sue $c.n $0.00 n.C3 (SUO) S9.73 :... ~ COt!IlERm~ AID mumm D!SPOS~l COSi PEF. 1 Of' mmE mCDWIO!.: 1 OF m -..------. TOTAl REnkU: (E-He THRU HHi) '4.m,est TOTAL DISPOSAL com (H-S: mL HHii $1,012.512 ~2. sex LANuFIll amm I 2; .8~ l2!~,~7e Lm PROPOser ADJUS7H ;.-.-- DEDUCT m__; : -----.-- 1Jl: --------; IE' UtiI"i : -..---- AtO -_._--: RATE ADJ UN:T r.~': ~7 WE m: RATE ~7 DISFOSI. FmCHlSE CFI !~CRHSE Nfl CISF~L Rm ~!C =RICHSE FE: REC\'CLUG Rm ~T Rem p.m AT E- 3:-S ~ ~.5~ At~ HH1 C~SlS m~ (71: NE7 Rm m) OF lET :OSTS FF & Rf' .. ,. HE 7-H: S.3C: )-Hl j ."'. ..-..-------------....--.....-........--......-.....-.........-----.....---..-..-----------------..---......-..-..--..-----------.-----------..-......-.......----.-....--......-.. UP TO [21 40 G~L cmums O~; TIME mm tif' ~l'" (S t.2 ~ ,lU4 S:.3: SU2 li.n su~ $3.01 11o.t ~ IC.BE $UO Slut (Sun 11 .12 . I........ m TIllES nm y flU' l$C.C SlUO S~.~3 SUP Ii; .82 $:. 'i .ue I1E.0~ 11.55 SG.De m.t: {Sun Si H THREE TIllES WEEm S:: .!2 (sue f27.12 S!.Z3 '1.90 'iUS S:.14 Ii .S7 m.~n $2.2t SO.OO m.3E,'O.92; S2 .4~ 11- 31- .,---- LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS 5CEtflMtO I 6 COl1trne/f(.c 114L- CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JULY 1, 1991 SCENARIO . 1B :------MINIMUM------: :-------MAXIMUM-------: NO. NO. WEEKLY RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT BINS PICK UPS 6-30-91 7-1-91 6-30-91 7-1-91 ----------------------- --------------------- ----------------------- 1 1 $54.95 $58.60 $64.80 $68.67 1 2 $91.50 $98.40 $108.90 $116.18 1 3 $126.60 $136.71 $152.65 $163.34 1 4 $166.40 $179.83 $198.45 $212.59 1 5 $204.20 $220.91 $244.40 $261. 99 1 6 $244.10 $264.13 $295.80 $316.97 1 7 $289.70 $313.17 $343.80 $368.46 2 1 $97.75 $104.79 $118.90 $126.40 2 2 $177.85 $191. 53 $201.70 $215.91 2 3 $235.55. $255.39 $273.65 $294.33 2 4 $304.95 $331.20 $352.30 $379.59 2 5 $381. 30 $414.11 $426.90 $460.72 2 6 $465.20 $504.74 $520.85 $561. 62 2 7 $549.10 $595.37 $608.70 $656.29 3 1 $140.90 $151.33 $173.50 $184.65 3 2 $243.25 $263.26 $285.40 $306.34 3 3 $332.45 $361. 74 $426.35 $457.72 3 4 $442.40 $481.44 $497.10 $537.35 3 5 $552.10 $600.88 $609.90 $659.96 3 6 $686.35 $745.41 $711.15 $770.76 3 7 $832.75 $902.36 $863.35 $933.64 4 1 $184.60 $198.43 $226.10 $240.85 4 2 $306.50 $332.78 $360.00 $387.46 4 3 $436.25 $475.15 $502.30 $542.66 4 4 $596.35 $648.55 $633.85 $686.87 4 5 $760.85 $826.44 $776.30 $842.23 4 6 $925.75 $1,004.73 $981. 25 $1,061.46 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,182.83 $1,145.85 $1,239.45 5 1 $225.80 $242.98 $276.25 $294.54 5 2 $392.00 $425.05 $441. 60 $475.74 5 3 $562.75 $611. 77 $571. 55 $620.76 5 4 $741.35 $806.51 $772.35 $838.19 5 5 $913.60 $394.76 $1,021.10 $1,104.63 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,187.71 $1,236.05 $1,336.52 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,426.09 $1,343.06 $1,458.09 6 1 $266.95 $287.48 $326.95 $348.80 6 2 $468.25 $507.86 $514.50 $555.13 6 3 $664.95 $723.54 $711.00 $770.61 6 4 $857.15 $934.62 $929.20 $1,008.26 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,148.87 $1,184.45 $1,283.78 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,377.07 $1,468.35 $1,588.58 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,623.87 $1,703.35 $1,843.41 11-:57 ",~...,~--<;-,,,,,,~.',;;,,;,,,,,"~-~......,,,,,,-'-~.....--,,,_.,... ... "--~_..-...--- mE: CVRESlc (TIT OF CHUl~ VIm RATE 14BLE mmm 1-H1 RESIDEITIAL RATES '-20-11 SCElARIO 18 YEAP. I GceN/f1{(O {B It e: 5 I P GNTJ1)L- DISPOSAL COST PER um CAlCUlATIIlI: TOiAL DISPOSAL COSTS ACTUAL m (H-gC 1HP.U HH1) TOTAL IUKBEF. OF ums m 1I0RTHt Y DISPOSAL COST PEP. um UlDFILL IICRUSE . 2:.n i+91 IIONTHLV DISPOSAL COS1 PEP. um I1-Hl $1,012,512 '1,317 $U506 $D.6 B13 $3.1m t/; um -DEDUC1- WASH am ADJ um :-- DEDUCT ----: :----- ADD ----: lEI um :---- ADD -----: UIIT RATE IJlJ um RAT! A1 RECYCLIlL Rm AT RECAlt RATE AT DISPOSAL FmCHISE lET PEP. cpr II:REASE Uk OISPSl RATE WID mcHSE FEE RECYCLIlS Rm AT Rom Rm ~1 6-3Hl FEE 6-3Hl 2.5: ADJ HHl COSTS FEES (11) UIIT RATE (U) OF m COSTS Ff I RF 1.0: FEE 1+91 3.m j-Hl ----------.------.----..-....-----------------------.------------------.----------------------- )1-38 "h'0,~~":..:.,'_'~ }~"_~~' '.';''i>'~~_::-'";>i::~;',~;;:,';;:r;!~'''', 7';'~~ LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS seEI/J AAtO ;If/- CITY OF CHULA VISTA coll1t11e)'flc I J4L- COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JUL Y 1, 1991 SCENARIO tt 2A :------MINIMUM------: :-------MAXIMUM-------: NO. NO. WEEKLY RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT BINS PICK UPS 6-30-91 7-1-91 6-30-91 7-1-91 ----------------------- --------------------- ----------------------- 1 1 $54.95 $59.08 $64.80 $69.23 1 2 $91.50 $99.20 $108.90 $117.14 1 3 $126.60 $137.83 $152.65 $164.68 1 4 $166.40 $181.30 $198.45 $214.33 1 5 $204.20 $222.71 $244.40 $264.14 1 6 $244.10 $266.28 $295.80 $319.57 1 7 $289.70 $315.73 $343.80 $371. 49 2 1 $97.75 $105.65 $118.90 $127.44 2 2 $177.85 $193.10 $201.70 $217.68 2 3 $235.55 $257.47 $273.65 $296.74 2 4 $304.95 $333.90 $352.30 $382.70 2 5 $381. 30 $417 .49 $426.90 $464.49 2 6 $465.20 $508.87 $520.85 $566.22 2 7 $549.10 $600.24 $608.70 $661.66 3 1 $140.90 $152.57 $173.50 $186.17 3 2 $243.25 $265.41 $285.40 $308.85 3 3 $332.45 $364.70 $426.35 $461. 47 3 4 $442.40 $485.37 $497.10 $541. 74 3 5 $552.10 $605.78 $609.90 $665.35 3 6 $686.35 $751.50 $711.15 $777 . 06 3 7 $832.75 $909.73 $863.35 $941. 27 4 1 $184.60 $200.06 $226.10 $242.83 4 2 $306.50 $335.50 $360.00 $390.64 4 3 $436.25 $479.03 $502.30 $547.10 4 4 $596.35 $653.84 $633.85 $692.49 4 5 $760.85 $833.18 $776.30 $849.11 4 6 $925.75 $1,012.94 $981. 25 $1,070.14 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,192.49 $1,145.85 $1,249.58 5 1 $225.80 $244.97 $276.25 $296.96 5 2 $392.00 $428.52 $441. 60 $479.64 5 3 $562.75 $616.76 $571.55 $625.83 5 4 $741.35 $813.09 $772.35 $845.03 5 5 $913.60 $1,002.87 $1,021.10 $1,113.66 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,197.40 $1,236.05 $1,347.45 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,437.73 $1,343.06 $1,470.00 6 1 $266.95 $289.83 $326.95 $351. 67 6 2 $468.25 $512.01 $514.50 $559.67 6 3 $664.95 $729.44 $711.00 $776.90 6 4 $857.15 $942.24 $929.20 $1,016.49 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,158.23 $1,184.45 $1,294.27 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,388.29 $1,468.35 $1 ,601. 57 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,637.11 $1,703.35 $1,858.48 "-07 -".~-~--_. .~,--_. ..._~.,-""._-- FlU: C'iREm cm OF CHULA VIm rm TAm EFFECTm 7-H1 RESIDEIlIAl RATES 1-20-91 seElARIO 2A YEAP. 1 >c eA/i''f~ I 0 ;;;. .4- IfG51 PE/f/TII"l-L DrsPOSAL COST PER um CALCULATION: TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS ACTUAL m If-He TYRU E-3~Si) TOT A~ lUUfP. O~ ums AYS ROITHL V DISPOSAL COST PEP. UIrT UNDrILl IRCREI.SE I 21.U H-91 KOliTHlY DISPOSAL caST PEE um f 7+11 '1,012,512 (l,m ,U5DE $G.l813 $3.1319 ~ UNIT -OEnUCi- .I.STE RATE An.: um :--- DEnUCT ---: :- ADD -: m um :-- ADD ---: um RATE AllJ am rATE AT RECYClIIG RATE AT RE:ALC RATE AT DISPCSAl fRAlCHISE lET PER cpr ItCREASE IEW DISPSl mE WID FRReHSE FEE REmma RATE AT RJCTN RATE AT HD-91 FEE HHl 2.5: ADJ H0-91 COSTS FEES PS) um RATE (61) OF IH. COSTS FF I RF 1.5: FEE 7-1-91 2.m 1+$1 ---.--------.-----------...-----..----------------..-----.. SlIm FAIlIlY t1C.56 tUO $UI (St.Hl .U2 $U5 ,U5 $t.13 '0.31 $3.13 SUS $UB $1.10 $11.51 ($0.26) $H.25 KtlLTI/FAKItY ums AFTEP. DIE UtH ADCnIOIAL ullT '7.91 $1.10 $U1 I$C.17) $t.54 ,US ,UI $3.12 '0.22 $3.13 H.C! $C.5T $1.1C $U5 ($C. H) $8.57 TRAILER PARIS I Roms (CEnRAllDCmOI) m!M PER KONTH t11.13 (tC.44) $1T .21 '2.4S S1.21 '13.63 'C.12 $3.13 $17 . 58 SU3 ,c.oe t1S.ce (sa.49l $18.51 m TIm mUl' $t.H (Sa.16) $ue SU5 SUS SUI sc.a s3.13 .U3 sua tUO ,7.0t m.m ,&.8S HiRH TIKES .:Em S; .90 f1C.20) '7.70 $2.45 .0.54 '4.11 tU8 '3.13 se.13 '0.66 'UO 'us ($0.22) $2.57 FOUP. TIMES WEE KlY aUf ISC.24) $UZ $2.(5 $0.65 $t.13 ,U7 $3.13 SSo 63 to.78 SC.oe tl0.41 (S0.26) tl0.15 DAIlY PICl UP (6 TIMES l $1:.8& ($0.21) '10.59 $2.45 $0.14 $1.40 .C.<< '3.13 S10.97 .U9 so.oe Sl'.I€ ($t.3C) Sll.U mIm PARKS (IIOrVIDUAl m SERVICE) PEP. VIIi ONE COLLEtTION mm St.8t ['C.17) $6.U $2.45 tU5 $3.72 SU2 S~.13 57.e6 $0.57 '~.oe $7.E5 lSt.19) $7.41 no COLlECTIOKS mm $a.lo (SO.23) $!.B7 '2.4: $C.62 sUO SU5 $S.tS sue .~. 75 SC.OO tlU3 ($C025) $9.78 :OKMERCrAl AID mUSTRm DISPOSAL COST PEP. : OF REHm CALCUWIOll: 1 OF REV -...----..- TOTAL REVEKUE (9-HO THRU HO-91) S(,m,855 TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS I H-9t THRU HHll $1,012,512 2U8: UROHU mmSE I 21.n sW,m t.m p?OF~m AJJUSm :----- DEDUCT -----: :------- ADD --------; m UKIT :------ ADJ -------; mE ADJ IIIlIT Rm AT Rm CALC RATE AT DISPOSAL FRANCH!SE cpr IkCREm m DISFSl R.\TE W/C FRKCHst FE RECVCmG mr AT Rom Rm AT HH~ U~ AC~ HHI eesTS FEES (al IE7 RA7E (6:) CF lET COSTS FF Z Rr 7.51 FEE 1-1091 2. m 7-Hl ..........---.......--.....-......--......---....--..-......-......---.....-- ........----.-------....-........----..............------....-.....-----......---.... ---..-..-..---..--------..---- U~ Te (2; 4C GA: cmmm OK: mE nEKL Y !1C.~C aUt) rO.2~ $2.35 ; $C.72 S7.l7 $:.~: SJotl rUi $0.66 suo S1 ~ .4t (5US) tl: .IS m TIm mm m.B; (SO.~7 ) Slue IU3 sUS S12. as ,c. i7 S:.'C t.... fl~ !: .55 sur S2UC (Sc.52) m.oe . j : .1>> ~ THF.H TIm mm 127 . 82 (fe. ?D) $27.12 SUj S !.SO l1! oS g ';.14 ,1.r S2:. 1: SZ.22 'C.OC $~ue (sc.m S2Ul ll-~ , (- '1-( ,'^, " ~ ,~, '~'''~'::~:f"",,''Il::''~''''~ "',""":: .:,~,:,,'~~'~'~"':~"-">'~ "'''''''-''"''~~~,'''''_''_'~_'':'~~'~'~~~_2:.~-~,~..:_~~L!lc/'~''''''.;<-'~"""~ 5CIif/l/AAIO :1- 13> ;( e-S/ f) el(J n}qL- DISPOSAl COST PER UlIT CALCC~mOi: cm OF CHUU VIm eATE TABLE EFFECTIVE 7-H1 RESIDEITIAL RATES 8-20-91 SCEiARIO 28 YEAR 1 FILE: CYRES2B TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS A:TUAL m (9-HO THP.~ HH1) TOT At iOOER OF llRITS AVE KOlTHLY DISPOSAL COST PH um LAKliFILL INCREASE I 2;.8: 7 -)oS 1 IOITHLY DISPOSAL COST PE? um I 7+91 $1,012,512 (1,311 $2.m6 $0.6813 $~.1319 llRIT -DEDUCT- WASH RATE ADJ 11m :--- DEDUCT --: :-- ADD _eo: IEW um :- Ann -: 8m aATE ADJ um RATE AT RECYCLm RATE Ai REm: RATE AT DISPOSAL FemHISE lET PER cpr ImEASE In DISPSL Rm WID FRICHSE FEE F.ECYCLIIG RATE AT Rom RATE Ai 6-30-91 FEE HHl 2.5: ADJ HHI COSTS FEES (is) um RATE (G:l OF lET COSTS FF 1 RF 7.as FEE 7+91 U6S 701-91 --------------------- SlaGLE FAIIIL Y KULTI/rum ums AFTER OlE EACH ADDITIOIAL um $lU6 '1.10 SS.e~ (SC.W $9.22 $U5 ,U5 $6.13 sa .3T $3.13 $U3 $0.72 $1.10 S11.45 ($C.26) $11.15 $7.11 $1.10 SUI ($C.17) SU4 S2.45 SC.4' $3.12 $0.22 $3.13 $7.08 SU3 SI.1C SUI ($0.19) S8.52 TRAILER PARIS 1 Koms (CEITRAL LOCmO~) KIlIIUH PEP. KORTH $1' .73 (Su,) S17.Z9 $2.45 S1.21 $13.63 SO.82 '3.13 $H.5B '1.32 SC.OO SlUO($US) $12.41 m TIRES WEEKlY $U' ($:.16 ) St. oe $2.45 $C.43 $3.21 SO.19 $3.13 $U3 $ue SC.OO '7.02 ($0.17) $t.85 THREE TIm WEEnY S7.9C ($0.20) $UO '2.(5 ,ue $t71 $0.28 SU3 $2.13 $0.61 $0.00 $8.U ($U2) 12.52 FOUP. TIMES mm ,; .(t ($:.24) $S.22 $2.45 SU5 $E. 13 $O.3T $3.13 $9.13 $O.T2 so.oo $10.35 ($0.26) '1US Dmy PICK UP (6 TIMES) $IC.Bt ($C.2T) $IU9 $2.(5 $0.14 $UO $0.<< $3.13 $1C.n st.8a sa.oo $li.80 ($0.30) $11.50 TRAILER pms (IlnmDuA~ elK SERVICE) PH um ORE COLLECTIO~ WEEny $Ul 1$0. Ii j SE.U 'U5 SUi $3.72 $0.22 S~.I~ ,7. 08 se.53 $0.00 S7.61 ($0.19) $7 .4~ m COLLECTIONS WEEm ,So lC (SC.23) $UT $2.45 SU2 $5.80 $U5 $~. 13 SU8 $UO suo sue ($0.25) SUS CQRf(ERCIAL AI!I IIDUSTRm DISPOSAL COST PER: OF REVEkUE CALCULnIOR: : 0: REV -------. TOTAl REVEIUE (S-HO THRU t-3H1) $~,m,m TOT AL DISPOSAL COSTS (H-90 THRU HH 1) SI,012,512 22.981 lARDFILL ImEAS: f 27.21 $281,472 t.m PRCmED ADJUSm :----- DEDUCT ---: :____u ADD -----: mum :---- m ___eo: Rm ~i RAE cm Rn: AT DISPOSU FP.AKCH~SE CP: mmSE m mm R~.iE I/O FRNCHSE FEE F.E:mm RATE AT HH~ U~ AD~ HHl com FEES (7:) lET RATE (6:) OF lET com FF 1 RF 7.0: FEE 1+91 RJ.iE ADJ UKF ROCTk RATE AT 2.16: 7-1-91 -..----..-..-...------------..----------..---..--..-----..--------..----------------..-----..-------..--------------------..--- UqO (2; 4C GAL CO~T mEp.s O~: mE mm 11 :' S J5 S 1 .24 !2.~~ SO.72 17.17 SU3 $~.Ol SIUi SUt sO.eo $ 1 ~. 4C ($U9 $11.11 ,0/;"; 1_: iIME5 WEEKLY I ~ .r I .C Ii ,. St2~ $:.2S 11~.8e $U7 SUO $ 1 i.Ot 1 i.(~ So. DC $2US (S:.52 S15.r ."tllO THREE TIm IEtm !2 .82 I .70 12 .12 st.23 sue SlUg 11.1' $7.S7 $~t.1C $2.1 i $UO S30.21 (1:.77 m.(5 , ,- "''' T.."_.'~."'~~.~."..:.,---'; SCENARIO 0 3A NO. NO. WEEKLY BINS PICK UPS 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JULY 1, 1991 - - - - -- MINIMUM- -- - - -; RATE AT RATE AT 6 -30 -91 7 -1 -91 $54.95 $58.76 $91.50 $98.66 $126.60 $137.08 $166.40 $180.32 $204.20 $221.51 $244.10 $264.84 $289.70 $314.02 SC &A/ft,K' L) 34 C o /ol m 0 <G ! pqL- - - - - - -- MAXIMUM-- - - - - -; RATE AT RATE AT 6 -30 -91 7 -1 -91 $64.80 $68.85 $108.90 $116.49 $152.65 $163.78 $198.45 $213.16 $244.40 $262.70 $295.80 $317.82 $343.80 $369.46 2 1 $97.75 $105.07 $118.90 $126.74 2 2 $177.85 $192.05 $201.70 $216.49 2 3 $235.55 $256.08 $273.65 $295.12 2 4 $304.95 $332.10 $352.30 $380.62 2 5 $381.30 $415.24 $426.90 $461.97 2 6 $465.20 $506.12 $520.85 $563.14 2 7 $549.10 $597.00 $608.70 $658.07 3 1 $140.90 $151.74 $173.50 $185.14 3 2 $243.25 $263.97 $285.40 $307.16 3 3 $332.45 $362.73 $426.35 $458.95 3 4 $442.40 $482.76 $497.10 $538.81 3 5 $552.10 $602.53 $609.90 $661.75 3 6 $686.35 $747.45 $711.15 $772.86 3 7 $832.75 $904.82 $863.35 $936.18 4 1 $184.60 $198.97 $226.10 $241.49 4 2 $306.50 $333.69 $360.00 $388.51 4 3 $436.25 $476.46 $502.30 $544.14 4 4 $596.35 $650.32 $633.85 $688.75 4 5 $760.85 $828.69 $776.30 $844.53 4 6 $925.75 $1,007.48 $981.25 $1,064.35 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,186.05 $1,145.85 $1,242.82 5 1 $225.80 $243.64 $276.25 $295.33 5 2 $392.00 $426.21 $441.60 $477.03 5 3 $562.75 $613.44 $571.55 $622.46 5 4 $741.35 $808.71 $772.35 $840.48 5 5 $913.60 . 1997.48 $1,021.10 $1,107.63 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,190.96 $1,236.05 $1,340.16 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,429.99 $1,343.06 $1,462.07 6 1 $266.95 $288.26 $326.95 $349.74 6 2 $468.25 $509.25 $514.50 $556.64 6 3 $664.95 $725.52 $711.00 $772.71 6 4 $857.15 $937.18 $929.20 $1,011.01 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,152.02 $1,184.45 $1,287.28 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,380.85 $1,468.35 $1,592.91 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,628.33 $1,703.35 $1,848.43 FILE: CVRES3~ crn OF CHUl~ VISTA Rm TAEi.E EFFmIVE 1-1-" USIDEITIAL RATES 1-2&-11 SCEURIO 3A YEAR I <;CEIf/ !fA-fO 3A ~ ~S" I 0 eM-r7 tcJt- DISPOSAl COST PER UIll CAlCUUTIOI: TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS ACTUAl \'TO (I+IC THRU 6-3&-11) TOTAl IUIISER OF ums AYG KOITHL Y DISPOSAL COST PER UIlT LA.OFILL IICREASE I 2T.81 1-1-" IIOUHLY DISPOSAL COSi PEF. um 11-Hl $1,012,512 el,317 $um $U B13 $3.131' .f um RATE AtJ DIll RATE AT RUm RATE AT T+" 3.15: 1-Hl um -DEDUCT- WASTE RATE ADJ um :- DEDUCT --: :- ADD --: lEV um :-- ADD ---: RATE AT RECYCLIIG RATE AT mALe RATE AT DISPOSAL FRAlCHISE lET PER CPI n:REASE m DISFSL RATE W/O FRlCHSE FEE RECYCLIIS 6-3D-" FEE HO-" 2.5S ADJ H&-I1 COSTS FEES (71) um RATE US) OF lET COSTS FF I IF 1.51 FEE ------------------ SIlGlE FARm KUL TI/FARIl Y UlITS AFTER ONE EACH ADOITIOiAL UIlT $1&.56 $1.10 $9.46 ($ue) U.22 $U5 $C.65 $6.13 $0.37 $3.13 U.63 $0.71 $1.10 $11.51 ($US) $11.14 $1.11 $1.10 $&.11 ($0.17) $6.64 $2.45 $U6 $3.12 $0.22 $3. a $7.0! $0.57 $1.10 $B.n ($0.26) $U' TRAIlER PARlS I Koms (CEKTRAL lOCATION) KIIIKIIK PER KOITH $17 . 73 ($C.U) S17 . 29 $2045 $1.21 $13.&3 $U2 $3.13 $H.S8 $1.43 $0.00 $IUO ($0.6!) $12.32 TWO TIKES WEEKLY U.24 Ut.16) $6.88 $2.45 $C.43 $3021 $0.1' $3.13 $6.53 $US $0.00 $7.06 UO.24) $&.82 THREE TIRES WEnL Y $7.10 ($0.20) $1.10 $2.45 $0.54 $4.11 $0.28 $3.13 $e.13 $U6 $0.00 U.79 ($0.30) aUf FOUR lIKES WEEm $9.46 ($0.24) U.22 $2.45 $0.65 $t. 13 $0.37 $3.13 $S.63 $0.78 $0.00 $10.41 (SC.36) $10.04 Dmy PICl UP (& TIKES) $10.86 ($0.21 ) $10.59 $2.45 $0.74 $7.40 $0,44 $3. t3 $IC.97 $U9 $UO $11.86 ($c.m $11.44 TRAlLEP. PARlS (IIDInDUAL CAK SERVICE) PER um OlE COLLECTION WEEnv $6.81 (SO. 17) $6.64 $2.45 $0.46 S3.12 $t.22 $3.13 $7.08 $D.57 $0.00 $7.65 UU6) $1.39 m COLLECTIONS WEEKLY $9.10 ($0.23) $2.87 $US $0.62 SUO $0.3S $3.13 $9.21 $0.15 $UO $10.03 ($U5) $U8 C~ERCIAL AID IIDUSTRIAL DISPOSAL COST PEE S OF REVENUE CALCULATION: S OF REi ......-..--... Tom REVENUE (9+90 THRU HO-9l) $',405,156 TOiAL DISPOSAL COSTS (9-HO THRU HO-9l) $1,012.512 22.m LARDFILL IICREASE I n.8~ m:,m un PROFOSEC ADJUSTED :-.- DEDUCT ---: :------ ADD ------: NEW um :---- ADu ----_.: Rm AD~ um RATE AT RATE mc RATE AT DISPOSAL FRANCHISE CPr INCREASE lEI DISPSL RATE WID FRICHSE FEE RECYCLnG RATE Ai Rem Rm AT HHl U: ADJ 6030-91 COSTS FEES (11) Ir RATE (6:1 OF lET COSTS FF & RF io5S FEE 7+91 30m I-HI ..-----------------------.-..----------------..------------------------------------------------------- U~ TO (2i '0 GA~ commRS ONE TIME mn \' SlUO (SUt) $IU4 JUS SU2 Si.11 $U3 S3.01 $10.61 Jt. 26 Jue Sl1.4E ($UO $11.05 mnmmm $If.8i (SUT) $lB.'O $4.23 .. S1.23 m.Sf $0.71 suo $19.0& $1.55 so.oo $20.60 aU3 SlUE iHREE TIm WEHL Y $21.82 {St. TO) $2i.12 SE.2j S: .90 SlUt $1.1: $1.91 m.lt S2.26 sUO s30.32 tS 1.0" $2S.3' 11-- tI'f ".".'""4~'f<'Ot>'i:,;:!"""''"'.,."\\'''~<:'f~.C~.,,,''r'''It','t!~~<j>.\t:~'':''"-~~~-;-. - SCENARIO # 3B NO. NO. WEEKLY BINS PICK UPS 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JULY 1, 1991 '- ----- MINIMUM- --- - -; RATE AT RATE AT 6 -30 -91 7 -1 -91 $54.95 $58.44 $91.50 $98.12 $126.60 $136.33 $166.40 $179.33 $204.20 $220.29 $244.10 $263.39 $289.70 $312.30 SC C/Ut l U 3 - ---- -- MAXIMUM-- - - - - -; RATE AT RATE AT 6 -30 -91 --------------- 7 -1 -91 $64.80 - $68.48 $108.90 $115.86 $152.65 $162.88 $198.45 $211.99 $244.40 $261.26 $295.80 $316.08 $343.80 $367.43 2 1 $97.75 $104.49 $118.90 $126.05 2 2 $177.85 $191.00 $201.70 $215.30 2 3 $235.55 $254.68 $273.65 $293.51 2 4 $304.95 $330.28 $352.30 $378.54 2 5 $381.30 $412.97 $426.90 $459.44 2 6 $465.20 $503.35 $520.85 $560.06 2 7 $549.10 $593.73 $608.70 $654.46 3 1 $140.90 $150.91 $173.50 $184.13 3 2 $243.25 $262.53 $285.40 $305.48 3 3 $332.45 $360.75 $426.35 $456.44 3 4 $442.40 $480.11 $497.10 $535.86 3 5 $552.10 $599.22 $609.90 $658.13 3 6 $686.35 $743.35 $711.15 $768.63 3 7 $832.75 $899.86 $863.35 $931.05 4 1 $184.60 $197.88 $226.10 $240.17 4 2 $306.50 $331.86 $360.00 $386.38 4 3 $436.25 $473.85 $502.30 $541.15 4 4 $596.35 $646.76 $633.85 $684.97 4 5 $760.85 $824.15 $776.30 $839.90 4 6 $925.75 $1,001.96 $981.25 $1,058.51 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,179.56 $1,145.85 $1,236.01 5 1 $225.80 $242.30 $276.25 $293.72 5 2 $392.00 $423.87 $441.60 $474.42 5 3 $562.75 $610.08 $571.55 $619.05 5 4 $741.35 $804.28 $772.35 $835.87 5 5 $913.60 $992.02 $1,021.10 $1,101.56 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,184.44 $1,236.05 $1,332.81 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,422.15 $1,343.06 $1,454.06 6 1 $266.95 $286.68 $326.95 $347.82 6 2 $468.25 $506.46 $514.50 $553.59 6 3 $664.95 $721.55 $711.00 $768.47 6 4 $857.15 $932.05 $929.20 $1,005.47 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,145.71 $1,184.45 $1,280.23 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,373.29 $1,468.35 $1,584.18 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,619.41 $1,703.35 $1,838.30 (66 5CE/i/AfilIO '3 f5 I{fjC;' P6V-nJA-L- FIlE: eYRES38 CITY OF CHULA VISTA lATE TABLE EFFE:TIVt 1-1-11 IESIDEITIAI. RATES 1-20-11 SCEWIO 31 YW 1 DISPOSAL COST PER om CAl.CULATIOlI: TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS ACTUAl m (1-\-.0 THU 6-30-") TOTAl IUDER OF UlITS AVG IIOml Y DISPOSAL COST PER um LAIDFIll IICREASE I 27.ft T-H1 KOllHlY DISPOSAL COST PER om I 7-1-11 11.012,512 .',317 Ium 10.6813 13.1319 um -DEDUCT- WTE RATE ADJ DlIT :- DEDUCT -: :- ADD-: lEV um :- ADD -: om RATE ADJ um RATE AT RECYCLII~ RATE AT RECAtC RATE AT DISPOSAl FRAlCHISE let PER CPI IICREASE lEV DISPSl RATE v/O FRICHSE fEE RECYClIG RATE AT ROm RATE AT 6- 30-91 FEE 6-30-91 2.5% ADJ 6-30-91 COSTS fEES (7:) DllT RATE (il) OF lET COSTS FF1RF 1.ft FEE 7-1-91 3.m 7-Hl -- ..----- SlaGLE FARIlY 110.56 1\.\0 1...6 {lO.W $9.22 12..5 10.65 16.13 IC.31 13.13 19.&3 IU.72 11.10 111..5 (10.36) 11'.0S IIUlTI/FARIl Y oms AFTER DIE EACH ADDIllO.AL URIT 17.11 11.10 16. 81 (10.17) $6.U 12. .S IU6 13.72 10.22 13.13 IU8 10.53 11.10 18.71 {lo.m IUS TWlER PARIS llloms (CEIlRALLDCmOR) III1lIlUII PER 1I0lTH 111.13 (l0.<<) 117.29 IUS 11.21 113.63 IU2 13013 111.51 11.32 IUD 118.10 (10.62) 112.22 TWO TIllES WEEnv I&.U (10.16) 1$.08 IU5 IU3 13.21 10.19 IS.13 16053 1D.C9 IUD 11.02 (10.24) 16.11 THREE TIllES WEEny II.'O (l0.20) 17.70 12..5 10.54 aU1 IC.28 13.13 $8.13 10.61 10.00 $8.74 (SO.30) 18.(3 FOUR TIllES IEEll Y 1...6 (SO.W 1'-22 12..5 10.65 11.13 10.37 13.13 19.63 10.72 IC.OO S10.35 (IC.36) IUI DAIlY PICl UP (6 TIllES) I1C.86 ( IG.27) 110.59 12.U 10.74 17..0 10.<< $3.13 I1C.17 IU3 IC.OO 111.80 (10..2) 111. 38 TRAILER PARlS (IIDInDUAL CAK SERVICE) PER um DIE COllECTIO~ WEEnv 16.81 ($0.17) 16.64 IUS IU6 13.12 10.22 $3.13 17.08 10.53 10.00 17.61 ($0.26) 17.35 TMC CCLLECTIOIS WEEnv 19.10 (10.23) 18.87 IUS 10.62 15.80 10.35 13.13 IU8 IUD 10.00 IS.9! (10.35) IS.63 COIlKtRCIAl AID IIDUSTRIAl DISPOSAl COST PER S OF REVEIUE CALCULATION: S OF REV --..- TOTAl REVEIUE (9+90 THRU 6-30-91) 14,m,m TOut DISPOSAL COSTS (H-90 THRU 6-30-91) 11,012,S12 22 . 98S lAIDFIlL IICREAS: I 2T.as 1281,478 1.39% PROPOSED ADJUSTED :--- DEDUCT -: :-- ADD ----: mum :----- ADD -------: RATE ACJ URI7 RATE AT RATE cm RATE Ai DISPOSAL FRAICHISE CPI IICRUSE m DISPSl RATE WID FRICHSE FEE RECYCL!GG mE AT ROm Rm AT 6-30-91 2.5: ADJ 6-30-91 COSTS FEES f7S) lET Rm In) OF NET COSTS FF I RF 7.0: FEE 1-1- 91 USS 7+91 .-_._--------~--------_._-----------------------------------..-------------------..-..-------------- U~ TO (2) .0 GAL CONTAINERS OKE mE WEEll Y 11Ut tie.2$! 11e.24 12.35 ~ se.!, l1.1i IU~ $3.01 11t.61 IUO suo 111.CO ($O.CO) " 1. 00 TWO TIllES Iml Y 118.8; lSQ..7 ) flue SU3 11.29 112.8B SC.71 lUG I1Ut '1.C3 IC.OO m.C! ($0.13) 119.17 THREE TIm mm $21.82 (IUD) 121.12 IU3 1'.10 11U9 f1. U $1.97 122.10 12.11 lCo Ot m.21 ($1.01) S25.1~ It- ~ .', ,.,,~,:;';:;;',~: '" ',":r-, '~-~;":"~"':Y:~-: ,. ,~,,;""'-,,":;;: II ~ ~7 "P<'('I'l'~~~",:,,:,,:_-:-::",A..- ~",:". ..~~~~": ""-"~"C17t,~..,~~~~."i~':""'G fIlE: CYlES4A cm OF CHULA YlSlA RATE TABLE EFFECTIVE I-HI IUIDEITIAL RATES 1-2&-11 SCWRlC 4A YEAF. 1 SCGIt/I1I'({O lll4 ;:{ (; S- i !?t?/VT 114'-- DISPOSAL COST PER um CALCULATION: TOTAL DISPOSAL COSTS ACTUAL YTD U-1-IO THRU 6-30-11) TOTAL I\IIIBER OF lIms AYG ROITHL y DISPOSA~ COST FER um WOFILL I1CREASE I 21.11 1-1-91 IIOITHLY DISPOSAL COST PEP. UIIT I H-Il $1.012,512 41,311 12.4506 lum 13.1319 JI UlIT -OEDUct- WASH RATE ADJ UIIT :-- DEDUCT -: :--- ADD __a: IEW um :-- ADD -: um Lm At~ um RATE AT IECyelIIG RATE AT IEem RATE AT DISPOSAL mlCHISE lET PER CPI tlCREASE IEW DISPSL RATE W/O FlICHSE FEE RECYCLIlG RAT: AT 10m lATE AT HG-Sl FEE 6-30-11 2.51 ADJ 6-30-91 COSTS FEES (11) UlIT RATE (61) OF lET COSTS FF I IF 1.SS FEE 1+91 3.m 1-1-9: SIISLE FAIlIL Y 110.56 11.10 $9.46 (SO.W $9.22 $2.45 IUS $6.13 $0.31 $3.13 15.13 Itll $~.10 $11.51 (IC.3o) '1 :.20 IULTI/FAIIILY ums AFTER OlE EACH ADDITIOIAL um 11.11 IUD 16.11 UO.11) 1"'4 12.45 IC.4i $3.12 $0.22 1:.13 11.08 $0.51 11.1C $8.15 (IC.22) IU3 TRAILER PAm IIllTHS (CEITRAL LOCmON) 'J IIIIIUI PER 10m 111.13 UO.<<) $11.29 12.45 '1.21 $lU3 $0.12 $3.13 111.51 11.43 IC.DO 115.DC (lUll $12.43 TWO TIlES WEEm IU4 (IC.16 ) $6.08 IU5 IU3 1:.21 10.19 13.13 $6.53 $0.53 ID.OO 11.06 (IUD) It.16 THREE TIlES WEEm S1. 90 (SC.2C) S1.10 12.45 SO.54 14.11 SUI $3.13 IE. 13 IU6 SUO SUS (se. m IU3 FOUR TINES WEElL Y S9.46 (SC. 24) 12.22 $2.45 10.H 16.13 SO.31 13.13 SU3 IU8 SUO 110.41 (SCo30) 11e.l0 DAIL Y PICk UP (6 TIlES) S 1 C.l6 ($0.21) $10.55 12.45 10.74 $1.40 IC.<< 13.13 11t.11 lo.s9 Ie. DC 111.86 ($U5) II :.51 TRAILER PARlS (IIDIYIDUAl CAl SERYICE) PEP. UNIT '\ OlE COlLECTIOK mm $6.81 (10.11) $6.U IUS 10.46 $3.12 $C.22 13.13 II. 08 IU1 IUO $1.65 lIC.~2) S1.43 TWO COLLEcnORS mm 19.10 (10.23) IUl IU5 IQ,62 $5.10 IUS $3.13 IUI $0.15 IUD SID. C3 (SU9) li.14 COlIIERCIAl AID IIDUSTP.IAl DISPOSAL COST PER 1 OF REVUUE CALCULATION: 1 OF REV ----- TOTAl REYEIUE (H. 90 THRU HQ-91) 14,m,856 TOT Al DISPOSAL C05TS (9- HO TRRU 6030-91) $1,012,512 22. S!I LANDFIlL INCREASE I 21. 8~ $211,4H un PROP05ED ADJUSTED :----- DEDUCT ----: : ------- ADO -----_..: mum : __n Ate ____n_: Rm ~, um 1m Ai 1m CALC mE Ai DISPOSAL FRAXCHISE CPI UCREASt lEI D!SPSl RATE W/O FINCHSE FEE RE:mm RATE Ai Rom R:.TE ~.i 6030-91 2.5: ADJ Ht-91 COSTS FEES (11) lET RATE (5:) OF lEi com FF I RF 1.51 FEE I-Hl 3.m 7"1..9 ~ ..-..--..............--..-...-...--..---........----.....-------..------.---------------------.----.---...--...--......-....----....--..---------.-.-..-..-..----- UP TO (2) 40 GAL comINER5 Oli: TIME mm SlC.SO ( SUt) $:C.24 $2 .3~ se. T2 $7.11 SU3 IJ.O: I1C.61 Sc.e5 $UC !11.46 iSO.34 s; ~. ~~ n: TIMES WEEm $18.81 (SUl) 11 tlO SU: . '1.21 11tU '0.77 SUO '19.06 r.5S ,c.oo m.6C (SU, s2C. DC THREE TIMES WEE f.LY W.82 I$C.I0, W.H SLl:! S1.ge , IUS SI.14 $7 .91 m.1C $2.n I~.OO sac.3! llue $2:.4: ) I - 'fa 5CEAJIf~IO 1.f8 LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS Comm~C\jCtL- CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMERCIAL BIN RATES JULY 1, 1991 SCENARIO . 4B I__~ -MINIMUM---: .MAXIMUM-----: I NO. NO. WEEKLY RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT RATE AT BINS PICK UPS 6-30-91 7-1-91 6-30-91 7-1-91 --------- ----- ---- ----------------------- 1 1 $54.95 $58.62 . $64.80 $68.70 1 2 $91.50 $98.44 $108.90 $116.23 1 3 $126.60 $136.76 $152.65 $163.40 1 4 $166.40 $179.90 $198.45 $212.67 1 5 $204.20 $220.99 $244.40 $262.09 1 6 $244.10 $264.22 $295.80 $317.08 1 7 $289.70 $313.29 $343.80 $368.60 2 1 $97.75 $104.83 $118.90 $126.45 2 2 $177.85 $191. 60 $201.70 $215.99 2 3 $235.55 $255.48 $273.65 $294.44 2 4 $304.95 $331. 32 $352.30 $379.73 2 5 $381.30 $414.26 $426.90 $460.89 2 6 $465.20 $504.93 $520.85 $561.83 2 7 $549.10 $595.59 $608.70 $656.53 . 3 1 $140.90 $151.38 $173.50 $184.72 3 2 $243.25 $263.35 $285.40. $306.45 3 3 $332.45 $361.88 $426.35 $457.89 3 4 $442.40 $481.62 $497.10 $537.55 3 5 $552.10 $601.10 $609.90 $660.20 3 6 $686.35 $745.69 $711.15 $771.04 3 7 $832.75 $902.70 $863.35 $933.98 4 1 $184.60 $198.51 $226.10 $240.94 4 2 $306.50 $332.90 $360.00 $387.61 4 3 $436.25 $475.33 $502.30 $542.86 4 4 $596.35 $648.79 $633.85 $687.13 4 5 $760.85 $826.74 $776.30 $842.54 4 6 $925.75 $1,005.10 $981.25 $1,061.85 4 7 $1,090.45 $1,183.26 $1,145.85 $1,23~.91 5 1 $225.80 $243.07 $276.25 $294.65 5 2 $392.00 $425.21 $441. 60 $475.92 5 3 $562.75 $611.99 $571.55 $620.99 5 4 $741.35 $806.80 $772.35 $838.50 5 5 $913.60 . $,995.12 $1,021.10 $1,105.04 5 6 $1,090.45 $1,188.14 $1,236.05 $1,337.01 5 7 $1,311.75 $1,426.61 $1,343.06 $1,458.63 6 1 $266.95 $287.59 $326.95 $348.93 "6 2 $468.25 $508.05 $514.50 $555.34 6 3 $664.95 $723.81 $711. 00 $770.89 6 4 $857.15 $934.96 $929.20 $1,008.63 6 5 $1,052.45 $1,149.29 $1,184.45 $1,284.26 6 6 $1,261.40 $1,377.57 $1,468.35 $1,589.17 6 7 $1,488.55 $1,624.47 $1,703.35 $1,844.09 " -:_~9 ,. ",.,.-""",,-~ . "..'"~N~~_ DISPOSAl COST PER 'lIT CALCULATIOI: TOTAL DISPOSAl COSTS ACTUAL m (1+10 THRU 6-30-911 TOTAL IUDER OF oms &YG IOITHL Y DISPOSAL COST PER um LAIOFILL IItlEASE . 27.IS 1+11 IOITHLY DISPOSAL COST PER um I 1-1-81 cm OF CHULA VIm lATE TABLE EFFECTIVE 7+11 IESIDEITIAL RATES '-20-11 SCElAP.IO 4E YEAP. 1 r;ceNl'fxlO 413 I~ eS I [) EN flAL- mE: CVRES4I 11,012,512 41,311 12.4506 lum $3.1319 DlIT -DEDUCT-WASTE RATE AD.! om :- DEDUCT --: :-- AIlD -: mum :- ADD ---: OKIT RATE AIlJUIIi RATE AT RECYCLIIG RATE AT REcm RATE AT DISPOSAl FRAI:HISE IEl PER CPr IICREASE lEV DISPSL RATE W/O FRlmE FEE RECY:LIIG RA IE AT RO:1I RATE AT 5-30-11 FEE 6-30-.1 US AIlJ Ho-.l COSTS FEES (TS) IlIIT RATE (6S) OF IE1 COSTS Ff IRF T.DS FEE H-Il 3.m 7-Hl ----- --------- SIGLE FARtLY $10.56 $1.10 U.U (It.24) $5.22 $2. 45 $U5 16. 13 10.37 $3.13 $9.63 $0.12 $1.10 $11.45 lIO.3D) It~ .1! IULTI/FARtLY ums AFTER ORE EACH AIlOITIOIAL um 17.11 $1.10 $6.11 (IU1) If.54 $2.45 IC.46 $3.12 $0.22 $3.13 $7.08 10.53 $1.10 $8.71 lIC.22l SUI TRAILER PARIS I ROms (CEITRAL LOCAHOR) IIIIIUI PER 10NTH $11.13 liD .44) $t1.n 12.45 11.21 113.63 $0.12 $3.13 s17 .58 $1.32 $UC I1UC ($0.51) m.33 no TIm WEEnY $6.24 ($U6 ) It.Df $2.45 SO.43 $3.21 $C.19 $3.13 $U3 $0,49 IUD si .02 (10.20) $U2 7HREE TIlES WEEnY $7.IC (IUD) I1.7C $2.45 10.54 $Ul $0.21 13.13 $8.13 $C.61 $C.CC sa.14 (10.25) $I.U FOUR TIlES WEEKlY $9.46 lIC.24) IS.22 $2.45 IUS 16.13 $C.37 $3.13 $i.63 10.72 IUC 110.35 (10.30) m.D5 OAIL Y PICI UP (6 TIlES) $IC.16 1$0.21) 110.59 $2.45 $0.14 17.40 $0.44 $3.13 $lC.17 SO.13 $'.00 111.10 (SD.35) 111.45 TRAIlER PARIS (IRDIVIDUAL m SERVICE) PER UIlT ONE COLLECTION WEm Y SUI ('0.17 ) IU4 '2.45 Ie .4$ $3.12 SO.22 S3.13 ,7.08 IU3 SO.DD S7.61 (SO.22) SUS TWO COLLECTIOIS WEEnY $9.10 (le.23) SU7 12.45 SO.62 15.10 SO.3S $3.13 SS.28 10.10 sC.oe SS.IB (SUI) SU9 COIKERCIAL AID IIDUS7RIAl DISPOSAl COST PER: OF REVEIUE CALCULATION: S OF REV -------- Tom REVEIUE (9-1-S0 THRU HD-SI) S4.m,15t Tom DISPOSAL COSTS (I-HO THRD 6-30-91) 11.012,512 22.m lANDFILL IICRUSE I 27. as m:,412 t.m PRopcm ACJUSm :---- DEDUCT ----: : ----- ADD -----: IEk um : ----- ADD -----: Rm tJlJ um mE Ai Rm CAL: am Ai D:SP05AL FRAGC~ISE CPr IKCREASE m DISPSl RATE kID FRICHSE FEE RECYCJIG Rm AT RDCTK mE AT HHl 2.5~ AD. HH1 teSTS msmJ m RATE (6~) OF m COSTS FF& RF 7.DS FEE T+91 3.22: 7+S1 -----....-......................................................----......---..........----....-..----........-..----------------..-....--....----------..-....-----......-..-....-------...... UP TO (2) 40 GAl comlNERS OGE TIME mKlY S~: .50 (sc.n SlC.2~ S:.3~ SC.72 Ii.n SU3 S3.01 SlUl sue so.oO $11.4C (SO.34) SlUT TWO TIm WEEKlY SlUT (SUi SlUO IU.:'" s 1.2~ S 12.Bf $Con SL4C SIS .0& $". SC.OO m.4S (SUI) SlUS I.it.l THREE TIMES mm S21.82 (Sue m.12 SE.~: suo S18.HS $l.U Si.17 m.l0 $2.11 sue 13C.21 1$:.9C) s2;.32 JJ-- 6c) ("Franchise Fee Rate Component"). and that portion of said rate charqed for all other purposes ("Other Rate Component") : the amount of modification in each Component of the rate that is being souqht: the amount of the modification in the entire rate beinq souqht: the amount of the new Rate Component: the amount of the new rate after the proposed modification: and the ;ustification for said proposed modification. ill "Other Rate Component" Chanqes. The amount of the increaae ah~ll be limited by the percentage incre~oe The proportion of modification to the "Other Rate Component" shall be limited bY the proportion of chanqe since grantee's last rate increase in the San Diego area Consumer Price Index for all urban consumers as compiled by the united States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for the latest twelve-month period for which statistics are available. In no event shall the amount of the increase exceed six percent (6%) of the service Rates. (~ A) In the event that the Consumer Price Index referred to in Paragraph (~) above shall no longer be published, then another similar generally recognized index may be substituted upon approval ~ ~ the City Manager.5 (J.5) "Landfill Rate Component" Chanqes. The proportion of modification to the Landfill Rate Component shall not exceed the proportion of chanqe since qrantee's last rate increase in the rate charged by the County of San Dieqo to Grantee for "tipping fees" at the Otay Landfill. or if the Otay Landfill has been closed. at the next closest operatinq landfill. for the latest twelve-month period. Where l~ndfill chargeo are increaaed grantee ahall notify City of i to intention to "p~Oo through II aaid coota thirty (30) d~ya prior to incre~aing ita ratea. The City council ahall hay:e the option to require a public hearing on thia increaae ~t ita diacretion. If the city doeo not notify gr~ntee of ito intention to require a public he~ring within the thirty (30) day notice period, grantee io authorized to increaae ratea. trash34.wp August 9, 1991 section 9, Marked for Changes Page 2 II - !~ (4) Franchise Fee Rate Component changes. The proportion of modification to the Franchise Fee Rate Component shall not exceed the proportion of chanqe in the Franchise Fee that is or may be required by law to be paid to the City of Chula vista. ~ Increase Approval Hierarchy. Annual modifications which constitute rate increases shall be subject to the review and written6 approval of the city Manager. unless the city council shall. within 20 days ("Public Hearinq option Period") after the commencement of the Notice Period set the rate modi- fication request for public hearinq. in which case said rate increases shall be subiect to. and not instituted until. the review and written approval of the City Council after said public hearinq. (6) No Public Hearinq Approval Procedure. If the city council has not set a public hearinq during the Public Hearinq option Period, the city Manager shall notify grantee in writing of his approval or denial of the increase within five (5) days of the end of the Public Hearing option Period. within twenty (20) oalendar dayo of reoeipt of aoourate and oomplete information oatiofaotorily oupporting any inoreaoe requeoted in aooordanoe with Paragraph (1) above. ill Notice to Grantee of Public Hearinq Approval Procedure. The City Council shall have the unilateral right to require a hearing for any rate increase at its discretion. If the City intends to require a public hearing, it shall notify grantee within oaid t\lenty (20) five (5) days after the end of the Public Hearinq option Eeriod. ~ Automatic Approval. . In the absence of any written communication from the City Manager or Council within oaid twenty (20) days five (5) days after the end of the Public Hearinq option Period to the contrary, a modification representinq a rate increase is deemed approved. l2l Frequency of Rate Increase Requests. No more than one such increase may be implemented in any trash34.wp August 9, 1991 Section 9, Marked for Changes Page 3 11-2 one calendar year although grantee shall have at any time the right to submit a request to the City Council for addi tional rate relief at any time extraordinary expenses are incurred. 9.3 Senior Rate Schedules. The City Council of the City of Chula vista may at any time, by amending Chapter 8.24 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, establish a program for preferential rates for senior citizens or other classifications which are deemed to be in the public interest. 9.4 Variable Rate structure. Grantee aarees to discuss with the City the concept. desian and implementaiton of a change in rate structure from a fixed rate to a rate structure which would vary based on the number and size of containers. or or such other basis which the city believes would provide an incentive for waste reduction." section 2. effect thirty hereof. This ordinance shall take and be in full force and (30) days after the final passage and adoption section 3. The city Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance; shall enter the same in the book of original Ordinances of said City; and shall make a minute of the passage and adoption hereof in the minutes of the meeting at which the same is passed and adopted. Presented by: LYman Christopher Finance Director Bruce M. Boogaar City Attorney trash34.wp August 9, 1991 section 9, Marked for Changes Page 4 _____~~_~f_ ~*ll TERESA ALAND MOTHER ALAND & INDWELLER 1433 NACI~ AVE CHULA VISTA, CA 91911 MAYOR AND COl.J.lCI L, THE ASSOCIATED BUSINESSES OF INDWELLER SUBMIT TO THE MAYOR AND THE CHULA VISTA CITY COl.J.lCIL A THIRD ALTERNATIVE TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR RESOLUTI~ OF 16301 AND ORDINANCE 2475. IN OPPOSITI~ TO ALTERNATIVE ONE AND TWO, INDWELLER RECOMMENDS THAT ALL OF THE $305,000, AND IN ADDITION THE .5% FRANCHISE TAX FEE FROM LAIDLAW; BE RETURNED TO THE PEOPLE OF CHULA VISTA IN THE DIRECT FORM OF A PUBLIC LAND TRUST C~ITRIBUTION. THIS PUBLIC ~D TRUST WILL IDENTIFY ~~D ESTABLISH THE APPROPRIATE LAND USES NECESSARY TO SUSTAIN A VIABLE ECONOMIC AND ECOLOGIC CYCLE. THE STRATEGIC LANDS PRESERVATION WILL PROVIDE THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WITH A UNIQUE INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES. AN ENTERPRISE ZONE WILL BE A RELATED BUSINESSES MECHANISM TO PRESERVE NATURAL RESOURCES AND MAINTAIN AGRICULTURE AND OPENSPACE. ALLOW THE PUBLI C TO PARTI CI PATE ON THEl R ()I...t.l BEHALF AND ALLOW BUSINESS TO COMPETE IN THE NEW INDUSTRY OF RECOVERABLE RESOURCES FOR ECONOMIC GROWTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SELF-RELIANCE. EACH RESOURCE RECOVERY BUSINESS IN THIS CITY REQUEST "YOUR SUPPORT FOR SPECIFIC Fl.J.lDING RELATED TO RECYCLING. A LIST OF AFFILIATED MEMBERS AND THEIR PART TO DIVERT WASTE AND REDUCE COSTS TO THE CITY AND ITS CITIZENS WILL BE PRESENTED TO COUNCIL BEFORE THE SEPTEMBER 27TH DEADLINE FOR COUNTY TAP FUNDING. II - NEWS RELEASE CONTACT: . Teresa Al and Director of INDWELLER (619) 422-1145 AUGUST 19, 1991 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE GET WHAT YOU PAY FOR iAND- PAY FOR WHAT YOU GET IT'S TIME THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA BETTER UNDERSTAND RECYCLING AS IT RELATES TO TRASH AND NATURAL RESOURCES. 1 . IT MEANS A NEW PERCEPT I ON OF WASTE. 2. IT MEANS ELIMINATE NEGATIVE AFFECTS TO THE ENVIRONMafT. 3. IT MEANS EVERYONES RESPONSIBILITY. 4. IT MEANS COMMITMENT TO MANDATORY RECYCLING WITH AN EQUITABLE BASE RATE AND VARIABLE CAN RATE. 5. IT MEANS .ELlMINATE THE MANDATORY TRASH ORDINANCE AND LAIDLAW'S CONTROL. 6. IT MEANS PRESERVE THE RI GHT OF CITI ZENS TO CHOOSE. THESE ARE THE OPTIONS: CITY COUNCIL'S ALTERNATIVE ONE AND TWO ALTERNATIVE tU $305,000 TO BE USED TO OFFSET FUTURE RATE INCREASES OVER THE NEXT THREE YEARS. (dwell ings overcharged) ALTERNATIVE 12 50,000 TO BE PAID IMMEDIATELY INTO A WASTE MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND AND THE REMAINING 255,000 TO BE USED TO OFFSET FUTURE RATE INCREASES OVER THE NEXT THREE YEARS. . INDWELLER PROPOSAL TO CITY COUNCIL INfrastructure Deal ing with Waste WELL, Earth Restoration ALTERNATIVE 13 ALL $305,000 (plus value of interest) AND .~1. OF LAIDLAWS FRANCHISE FEES PAID (as of April 1991) TO GO DIRECTLY INTO THE INDWELLER LAND TRUST, WHICH WILL ESTABLISH PUBLIC FACILITIES FOR THE PEOPLE TO RECYCLE AND PROTECT APPROPRIATE LAND USES, WHICH IN TURN WILL KEEP THE COST OF HANDLING WASTE CONTROLLED BEYOND THREE YEARS. THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA STILL HAS AN OPPORTl:lNITY TO PROVInE A UNIQUE PUBLIC FACILITY AND LAND PRESERVATION MANAGEMENT INFRASTRUCTURE FOR THE SOUTH COLNTY. LET'S NOT THRW IT (jUAY. I ) - ~)'~ 84'8884'6 Ri:' roo r. ''-IF" n ~ b '..# .:-'~ " ~ f'_d"_ LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS "91 i1IJG 26 P4 :19 August 26, 1991 g~~ tLE~J:::t/};:J! The Mayor and Members of the Oty Council Oty of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mayor and Council Members, On behalf of Laidlaw Waste Systems, I encourage your approval of the staff recommendation regarding the rate increase for refuse collection services. Since acquiring the franchise as part of the GSX acquisition in 1986, Laidlaw has provided to the citizens of Chula Vista the highest quality waste collection services, while being compensated in accordance with the agreement stipulated in City Ordinance No. 1993 of July, 1982 as amended by Ordinance No. 2104 of February, 1985. Contrary to press reports, Laidlaw has not "overcharged" customers, but, rather, has applied for rate increases in accordance with the language of these Ordinances in the same manner as our predecessor companies. All such rate increases were reviewed and recommended for approval by City staff and ratified by the City Council. I would emphasize to you that our agreement to repay $305,000 is based on a re-interpretation of the language of the Ordinances by the present City Attorney which we have agreed to apply retroactively. This agreement was negotiated in good faith by Laidlaw and City staff as a means of resolving an impasse and "getting on with business.. While $305,000 is a significant amount of money, it represents less than 1% of Laidlaw's billings in Chula Vista over the period concerned. I have some comments on specific aspects of the Staff Report: The rate comparison with other cities in the County suggests that, with the July 1 increase, Chula Vista rates will be somewhat higher than the County average. In fact, we contend that when allowance is made for the difference in franchise rates as well as the reduced rates in Chula Vista for senior citizens, multi-family units and trailer parks, then the average rate in Chula Vista is in fact lower than the County average. In addition, the Chula Vista rates include the cost of Laidlaw's monthly and quarterly billings and the bad debts resulting from customers' non-payment. In many other cities, billings are combined with other utility bills at no cost to the waste hauler who simply receives one check each month from the City. I would also point out that, at the request of the City, Laidlaw is using the City of Chula Vista computer system for residential billing at an estimated additional cost of SI,250 per month, equivalent to SO.05 per residential customer. At the City Council meeting on August 13, staff were asked if Laidlaw could show that the CPI rate increase of 6% was justified by actual increases in operating costs. In fact, our divisional operating costs increased by 8.8% for the twelve month period ending June 30, 1991, excluding landfill and franchise fee increases, and adjusted for growth. While we voluntarily provided this information to the City for this year, I think it is important to remember that an important aspect of City Ordinance No. 2104, adopted in 1985, was the change from rate increases based on actual costs to the CPI basis. This was done at the City's request to avoid the problems and audit costs involved in verifying actual cost increases. 678 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 307, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 (619) 427-n09 Recycled Paper I ~ 5'7 Staff were also asked to report on the city's cost to verify and negotiate the proposed agreement with Laidlaw. This amounted to $12.000, including outside audit costs. We strongly support staff's recommendation that it i$ not appropriate for Laidlaw to bear these costs for the following reasons: . As pointed out in the staff report, franchise fees of approximately $500,000 per year are intended to cover the administration costs of the franchise. . This agreement was reached on the basis of a re-interpretation of the Ordinance language. Laidlaw's staff costs in calculating the retroactive effect and the various options requested by Oty Council far exceed those of the City staff. . As part of the agreement with staff, Laidlaw has also agreed to defer the effective date of the CPI increase for this year from April 1 to July 1. This will cost Laidlaw $69,000 in lost revenues. . County landfill rates did increase by almost 28% to $23.00 per ton on July 1. Laidlaw is paying the increased rate without the revenue to pay for disposal costs. In conclusion, I would restate our support for the staff recommendations and underscore the importance of reaching a decision tonight on the cost of refuse collection services in the City. This is important for: . Laidlaw who has been forced to delay quarterly residential billings by over two months, and has not yet been able to bill monthly commercial services for July. As we have consolidated billing systems, this includes customers in Imperial Beach and the unincorporated areas of the County as well as Chula Vista. . The City as they are not receiving franchise fees, which are based on cash receipts. . Most significantly, it is important to the residents of Chula Vista who are receiving collection service and deserve to know the cost of that service. For those residential customers on limited monthly budgets, any further delay in approval could result in them receiving two quarterly billings in the same month. Thank you for your consideration and action on this agenda item. Z1l Alan J. P Market 2 ; I - ."""...._~._~.~_._""~.~~.._-,~.,._._- 84'8884'1 LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS CITY OF CHULA VISTA FREE SERVICES 1. Chula Vista clean up days 2. Sweep for Yule Parade 3. Sweep for Country Days & Bins 4. Rolloffs (4) for 3rd Avenue Business Festival 5. Bins for Bonita Festival 6. Sweep for Jaycees Parade this year 7. Bins for Optimist Club 8. Trash service for South Bay Community Services 9. Bins for Harbor Days at Marina 10. Rolloffs for Nature Interpative Center 11. Bins for Arturios Barrios Race 12. Barrels for Orange Crate Derby/Bonita Valley Belles 13. Rolloffs for code enforcement clean ups all through the year. 14. Bins for Marina 4th of July 15. Arturios Barrios Race 16. Chula Vista Police Department 17. YMCA 12 MONTH TOTAL 678 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 307, CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92010 (619) 427-n09 Recycled Paper ) j \, $20,000 $200 $800 "$1,152 $500 $200 $500 $125 $500 $1,000 $500 $500 $15,000 $500 $10,000 $150 $3,500 ~51.627 8888/186 R J:' r- C" I' , F '" .b \.# .,__..".. _.._i_J LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS )il mJG 26 P4 :19 August 26, 1991 C'TV r,....~'c;;' j ; ,". I ',' , ,",., '. '.,. . ; _~, t.J_. ',. .._ r.., ,.: ; ~:, CITY CLE?:\',~ ~">::~ "',' The Mayor and Members of the City Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mayor and Council Members, On behalf of Laidlaw Waste Systems, I encourage your approval of the staff recommendation regarding the rate increase for refuse collection services. Since acquiring the franchise as part of the GSX acquisition in 1986, Laidlaw has provided to the citizens of Chula Vista the highest quality waste collection services, while being compensated in accordance with the agreement stipulated in City Ordinance No. 1993 of July, 1982 as amended by Ordinance No. 2104 of February, 1985. Contrary to press reports, Laidlaw has not "overcharged" customers, but, rather, has applied for rate increases in accordance with the language of these Ordinances in the same manner as our predecessor companies. All such rate increases were reviewed and recommended for approval by City staff and ratified by the City Council. I would emphasize to you that our agreement to repay $305,000 is based on a re-interpretation of the language of the Ordinances by the present City Attorney which we have agreed to apply retroactively. This agreement was negotiated in good faith by Laidlaw and City staff as a means of resolving an impasse and "getting on with business". While $305,000 is a significant amount of money, it represents less than 1% of Laidlaw's billings in Chula Vista over the period concerned. I have some comments on specific aspects of the Staff Report: The rate comparison with other cities in the County suggests that, with the July 1 increase, Chula Vista rates will be somewhat higher than the County average. In fact, we contend that when allowance is made for the difference in franchise rates as well as the reduced rates in Chula Vista for senior citizens, multi-family units and trailer parks, then the average rate in Chula Vista is in fact lower than the County average. In addition, the Chula Vista rates include the cost of Laidlaw's monthly and quarterly billings and the bad debts resulting from customers' non-payment. In many other cities, billings are combined with other utility bills at no cost to the waste hauler who simply receives one check each month from the City. I would also point out that, at the request of the City, Laidlaw is using the City of Chula Vista computer system for residential billing at an estimated additional cost of $1,250 per month, equivalent to SO.05 per residential customer. At the City Council meeting on August 13, staff were asked if Laidlaw could show that the CPI rate increase of 6% was justified by actual increases in operating costs. In fact, our divisional operating costs increased by 8.8% for the twelve month period ending June 30, 1991, excluding landfill and franchise fee increases, and adjusted for growth. While we voluntarily provided this information to the City for this year, I think it is important to remember that an important aspect of City Ordinance No. 2104, adopted in 1985, was the change from rate increases based on actual costs to the CPI basis. This was done at the City's request to avoid the problems and audit costs involved in verifying actual cost increases. 678 THIRD AVENUE, SUITE 307, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 (619) 427-n09 Recycled Paper \ ' Staff were also asked to report on the city's cost to verify and negotiate the proposed agreement with Laidlaw. This amounted to $12,000, including outside audit costs. We strongly support staffs recommendation that it i$ not appropriate for Laidlaw to bear these costs for the following reasons: . As pointed out in the staff report, franchise fees of approximately $500,000 per year are intended to cover the administration costs of the franchise. . This agreement was reached on the basis of a re-interpretation of the Ordinance language. Laidlaw's staff costs in calculating the retroactive effect and the various options requested by City Council far exceed those of the City staff. . As part of the agreement with staff, Laidlaw has also agreed to defer the effective date of the CPI increase for this year from April 1 to July 1. This will cost Laidlaw $69,000 in lost revenues. . County landfill rates did increase by almost 28% to $23.00 per ton on July 1. Laidlaw is paying the increased rate without the revenue to pay for disposal costs. In conclusion, I would restate our support for the staff recommendations and underscore the importance of reaching a decision tonight on the cost of refuse collection services in the City. This is important for: . Laidlaw who has been forced to delay quarterly residential billings by over two months, and has not yet been able to bill monthly commercial services for July. As we have consolidated billing systems, this includes customers in Imperial Beach and the unincorporated areas of the County as well as Chula Vista. . The City as they are not receiving franchise fees, which are based on cash receipts. . Most significantly, it is important to the residents of Chula Vista who are receiving collection service and deserve to know the cost of that service. For those residential customers on limited monthly budgets, any further delay in approval could result in them receiving two quarterly billings in the same month. Thank you for your consideration and action on this agenda item. Z21~ Alan J. P Market 2 ) I, ! < / ! i Lf COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item) !l ITEM TITLE: Meeting Date 8/27/91 Public Hearing: Proposed Amendments to City of Chula Vista General Plan Director of Planning ~~ City Manager ..JC1 ~~~') (4j5ths Vote: Yes_No--L) SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: Under State law, cities and counties are limited to consideration of no more than four amendments to the General Pl an per calendar year. Each of these four amendments may include more than one change to the General Plan. Council has already acted on one General Plan Amendment this year involving the Central Chul a Vi sta Zoni ng Consi stency Study. In order to preserve future options for considering other pending or proposed general plan amendments during 1991, staff has scheduled GPA 91-03 (Otay Market) and GPA 90-01 (Kelton Title Corporation) for consideration as a single General Plan Amendment. Following this memorandum are separate agenda statements on each of the two requests. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council open the publ ic hearing and take public testimony on each of the two proposals separately. However, at the close of the public hearing on the second request, it is recommended that Council consider both requests as a single action, and direct the City Attorney to prepare an appropriate resolution reflecting their intended action. Similarly, Council should provide direction as to the preparation of ordinances which would implement appropriate rezoning for each of the two sites. The attached chart summari zes the necessary actions for each of the two cases. WPC 9687P I'-~I = r- <'0 0 "r- r- .jJ U <'0 S- "r-- QJ +> <'0 E C QJ E QJ S- O -0 c::( -0 U 'r- C = QJ tIl >,<'0 QJ 0.. +> QJ-o > I <'0 0::: ::5 r-- . r- 0 C .jJ <'O+> I S- E(/) C <'0 U QJ c::( :J 0 S- = +> .,.... r-- -,.... +.J r- M -0 <'0 tIl tIl 0 c::( ....... QJ'r- tIl . r- +> I ::E U QJ C 4- 0 I QJ 4- 'r- = 4- C"I ::: 0.0 E ....... <'0 I O(/) S--O I .jJ (/) -J ........... 0.. c::( 0::: (/) ....... = = = QJ r-- +> ....... 'r- 0 l- I 0 CC"I 0 I +>c::( r- 0.. QJc.!:l :><::........... 0 r- +> <'0 CO 'r-- +> <'0 +> C QJ= tIl QJ s- r- QJ -0 c::( <'0 :J "r- 'r- tIl >, U 0.. QJ QJ -0 s- I 0::: 0::: :J QJ U +> E I tIl E(/) E U tIl :J 0 = +> +> .,.... r-- U C C M -0 <'0 0 QJ <'0 ....... QJ ....... r-- .jJ E U I ::E U'r- -0 'r- 0 I QJ <'0 = C r- C"I ::: 0. .jJ ....... QJ I O(/) QJ I E (/) -J ........ 0::: 0::: c::( c::( ....... = = = C <'0 r- 0.. r- <'0 s- QJ C QJ c.!:l -0 QJ .jJ = 'r- Or- E.jJ <'0 'r- 'r- 0.. -J= U I c;nS- I- -0 C QJ I C'r- E U +>- <'0 S- E = QJM :J 0 ~o ~+>U 0 S- I M U U .jJ <'0....... M S- <'0 r- ::E C"I I <'0 4- 'r- = I ....... QJ :J <'0 r--.. >,C::( C"I tIl C+> M <'00.. I QJ <'0 QJ I .jJ c.!:l (/) O:::::EO::: U 0........... ....... = c::( C C <'0 0 r- 'r- 0.. .jJ ~~ C > <'0 r- QJ 'r- S- <'0 E QJ +><'0 s- -0 C <'0 r- QJ C 0 U C QJ N QJ QJ QJ E QJ z: Cl c.!:l c::( 0::: I~ -" ,- ---~.~-~.~...~...,_._~--,--~.-.- -,;~"-;".,~.~.._.....~. c: o .... ~-+o.) >10 .... ~ ~IO 10.... U C1.lC1.l :z: c c: 10 .... 0.. -+0.) c: .... C1.l IOE ~"C C1.lC: C:C1.l C1.lE ~ c:( C1.l c: o N C1.l 0::: )2-:3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item-Jl2lt Meeting Date 8/27/91 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: GPA-91-03, PCZ-91-E; City-initiated proposal to amend the City General Plan, from Research and Limited Manufacturing to Retail Commercial, for certain territory, generally bounded by Main Street to the north, Broadway (Beyer Boul evard) to the east, Fai vre Street to the south, and 27th Street to the west (Assessors Parcel Nos. 629-040-01 and 629-010-01). Also requested is an amendment to the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research and Limited Industrial to Mercantile and Office Commercial, and a rezone from City-adopted County zone classification C-37 to City classification C-T-P. The precise boundary and proposed amendments and rezoning are depicted on attached Exhibits "A" and "B" SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning /~~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager.j, Gt ~ ~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..1LJ BACKGROUND This proposal involves an amendment to the City General Plan and the Montgomery Specific Plan, as well as a rezoning for the property located at the southwest corner of Main Street and Broadway in the Otay area of Montgomery (Otay Market). Zoning of the subject properties was deferred at the. Public Hearing of November 13, 1990, Harborside "B" Part II, zoning recl assifi cat i on of the Montgomery area, because of a zoni ng and 1 and use concern raised by the property owner. The request under cons i derat ion woul d amend the City General Plan from Research and Limited Manufacturing to Retail Commercial, the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research and Limited Industrial to Mercant il e and Offi ce Commercial, and wi 11 rezone the property from the City-adopted County zone C-37 (Heavy Commercial) to the City classification C-T-P (Thoroughfare Commercial, Precise Plan Overlay). The Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) conducted an Initial Study, IS-91-33, of potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed amendments and rezoning. Based on that attached Initial Study and comments thereon, if any, the (ERC) has concluded that this reclassification would cause no significant environmental impacts and has issued a Negative Declaration on IS-91-33. RECOMMENDATION: 1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, find that this reclassification and rezoning will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-33 for the Otay Market rezone. 12B -, Page 2, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 2. Approve a change to the General Plan designation to Retail Commercial, and the Montgomery Spec ifi c Pl an des i gnat i on to Mercant il e and Offi ce Commercial, for the property as described on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Adopt an ordinance changing the zone classification from the City-adopted County zone "C37" to the City classification C-T-P for the subject property. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Both the Montgomery Planning Committee and the City Pl anni ng Commi ss ion, at thei r publ i c heari ngs on these matters held July 3, 1991, and July 10, 1991 respectively, unanimously recommended that the following actions be taken: 1. Based on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, and comments thereon, find that these actions will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-33. 2. Adopt i on of reso 1 ut i on chang i ng the General Pl an des i gnat i on to Retail Commercial and the Montgomery Specific Plan designation to Mercantile and Office Commercial. 3. Adoption of an ordinance changing the zoning classification to the City's "C-T-P". DISCUSSION: 1. Previous Actions At the November 13, 1990 public hearing on the Harborside B Part II area of the Montgomery Rezoning Program (PCZ-90-Q-M), Council directed staff to prepare a background report on the resolution of a zoning and land use concern raised by Mr. Paul Tamayo regarding his Otay Farms Market. Mr. Tamayo expressed concern over the original City rezoning proposal for the site of I-L-P (Limited Industrial with Precise Plan) which would have implemented the Research and Limited Industrial designation on the Montgomery Specific Plan. Under the I-L-P zone, Mr. Tamayo would not be able to remodel and expand the market which has occupied the site under the County's C-37 (Heavy Commercial) zone for approximately 20 years. Mr. Tamayo reiterated the family's intent to demolish the existing market and rebuild a larger one on the 1.35 ac parcel immediately south of the 0.51 acre site, and to use the smaller site for increased parking needs. He requested the City zone the site commercial to allow for expansion and continuation of the existing market. Since the City General Plan as well as the Montgomery Specific Plan designate the property industrial, and the parcels are within a Special Study Area of the Montgomery Specific Plan, staff was directed to expedite addressment of that portion of the Study Area necessary to accommodate Mr. Tamayo's request. The project has been 1 imited at thi s time to include only Mr. Tamayo's property since the majority of the Special Study Area surrounding the market was rezoned to the City I-L-P zone at the November 13, 1990 hearing. I~R-~ Page 3, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 2. Preliminary ConceDt Plans Mr. Tamayo, in conjunction with the processing of this application, provided the City with prel iminary concept pl ans for the expansion and reconstruct i on of the market. Mr. Tamayo has been informed that the property will most likely not support the amount of square footage indicated on those plans and that when plans are submitted for the ultimate project, traffic and circulation impacts will be assessed. Ultimately, mitigation measures for traffic may be included with a final project. Initially, staff and the City Council discussed a designation of C-C-P (Central Commercial with Precise Plan). Based on the uses identified on the concept plans and a review of the zoning code, staff is recommending a zone classification of C-T-P (Thoroughfare Commercial with Precise Plan) for the property. This designation would accommodate the expanded market and associated uses such as a tortilla factory as presented by Mr. Tamayo. 3. Adjacent Zonina and Land Use North C-T-P I-L-P Commercial strip centers on the west side of Broadway Car sales lot and mobile home park on east side of Broadway South East I-L-P I-L-P I-L-P Vacant, open storage Gas station, thrift store, commercial automotive West Auto repair, offices, metal works, tires 4. Existina Site Characteristics The subject parcels occupy level ground at the corner of Main Street and Broadway (Beyer Boulevard). The extreme northern corner of the parcel is ut il i zed as a car lot. Otay Market is a s i ngl e story, approxi mate 1 y 8,500 square foot building located on the remainder of the 0.51 acre parcel. Approximately 56 parki ng spaces are marked ons ite. Access is taken from both Broadway (Beyer) and 27th Street. A flower stand is located on the lot as well. The 1.35 acre parcel to the south is vacant, with a portion used for storage. The intersection of Main Street and Broadway is signal ized. There are signalized left turn lanes for east and west bound traffic onto Broadway and for north and south bound traffic onto Main Street. The intersection of 27th Street and Main Street does not appear to be located an adequate distance from the Main and Broadway intersection. However, the former is not fully improved and left turns onto west bound Main Street will need to be considered with the ultimate project. '~A--3 Page 4, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 5. Soecific Plan The subject parcels were contained in the Harborside B Part II subcommunity of the Montgomery Specific Plan. The Specific Plan designates the property Research and Limited Industrial and identifies it as a port i on of the Spec ia 1 Study Area 1 oca ted south of Ma in Street between Industrial Boulevard and Broadway. As previously stated, the majority of the Special Study Area has been rezoned to I-L-P. The subject parcel was deferred for the opportunity to consider commercial zoning consistent with the established market onsite. ANALYSIS Severa 1 factors support the General Pl an amendment, Spec i fi c Pl an amendment and rezoning described above: 1. The Chul a Vi sta General Pl an encourages the redevelopment, upgrade and replacement of older and/or marginal retail uses along Broadway and Main Street. The exi st i ng Otay Market has served the area for the past 20 years. Allowing its expansion and remodel will be consistent with the General Plan goals. 2. Surrounding General Plan designations include Retail Commercial to the immediate north and Thoroughfare Commercial to the northwest. The proposed amendment will carry the commercial designation in an orderly manner along Broadway to the limits of the flood plain adjacent to the southern City boundary. 3. The Montgomery Specific Plan calls for the rehabilitation and revitalization of the various neighborhoods in Montgomery. The Otay Market provides a neighborhood grocery outlet for the residential areas to the north and east. The proposed spec i fi c plan amendment will allow for its expansion and continued use. 4. Surrounding Specific plan designations include Mercantile and Office Commercial to the immediate north and Heavy Commercial to the northwest. The proposed amendment will relate to these commercial designations and create a commercial node at the corner of Broadway and Main Street. 5. The proposed zone reclassification converts the City-adopted County zoning of C-37 (Heavy Commercial) to the similar City classification C-T-P, and allows the expansion and redevelopment of the existing market. 6. The precise plan requirement will ensure that development of the parcels provides adequate buffer to the adjacent industri al uses and that the onsite uses are adequately planned. Supplemental Findings for application of the lip" Modifier are contained in Attachment 1 to this report. FISCAL IMPACT: None. WPC 9618P , ~ A-1 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Itema Meeting Date 8/27/91 ITEM TITLE: Publ ic Hearing: GPA-90-01, PCZ-90-B; Proposal to amend the Land Use Di agram of the City General Pl an by redes i gnat ion from "Low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 du/ac)" and "Special Study" to "Retail Commerc i a 1" , and to change the zon i ng classification from "R-l" to "C-C-P", for approximately 3.65 acres of 1 and, located at the southeast corner of East H Street and Otay lakes Road - Kelton Title Corporation SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ;I~~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ,~) (4/5ths Vote: Yes_Noll BACKGROUND Current Requests The subject General Plan Amendment request for "Retail Commercial" is part of a joint application involving a companion request for rezoning of the subject site from "R-l" (Single-Family Residential) to "C-C-P" (Central Commercial subject to Precise Plan). The intent of these requests is to allow the applicant to submit plans for development of a retail convenience center on the site. An Initial Study (IS-90-13) of possible significant environmental impacts from the appl i cant' s proposal has been conducted. The Envi ronmenta 1 Revi ew Coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental effects if specific with mitigation measures are included, and has therefore issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum. Pursuant to assessment of alternative land uses, and staff's recommendation for denial of the applicant's request and approval of a General Plan Amendment to "Professional and Administrative Commercial", an alternate Negative Declaration, titled IS-90-13 Negat i ve Decl arat i on Alternate, was prepared. Shoul d staff's recommendation be followed, the Environmental Review Coordinator has recommended that the Negative Declaration Alternate for IS-90-13 be adopted. History Original applications to amend the General Plan from "Low-Medium Density Residential" to "Retail Commercial", and rezone the subject site from "R-l to "C-C-P", were filed in June 1986 by the same project appl icant, Kelton Title Corporation. In December 1986, the Planning Commission voted to deny the request. In February 1987, the City Council considered an appeal of the Planning Commission action, and referred matters back to the Planning Commission for reconsideration. The amendment appl ication was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant in May of 1987. At the July 11, 1989, City Council public hearing on the General Plan Update, the matter of determining an appropriate land use for the subject site arose, and the Council unanimously moved to have the site placed in a "Special Study Area" in order that a more comprehensive evaluation of appropriate alternative "G -- I Page 2, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 land uses to the existing residential designation occur. Subsequently, Kelton Title Corporation submitted their current general pl an amendment and rezone applications for consideration. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Based on the fi nd i ngs and recommendat ions of the Env i ronmenta 1 Rev i ew Coordinator, adopt IS-90-13 Negative Declaration Alternate.1 2. Deny the applicant's request for a General Plan Amendment to "Retail Commercial", and rezoning to "C-C-P". 3. Approve an amendment to "Professional and Administrative Commercial", and rezone to "C-Q-P" including the Precise Plan Guidelines attached as Appendix 3. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At their July 24, 1991 hearing the Planning Commission unanimously passed the following motions recommending that the City Council: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Monitoring Program prepared in conjunction with IS-90-13. 2. Adopt a resolution amending the General Plan from "low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 du/ac)" and "Special Study Area" to "Retail Commercial". 3. Adopt an ordinance changing the zoning from "R-1" to "C-C-P" including adoption of the Precise Plan Guidelines. BASIC INFORMATION 1. Subject Property The property is a vacant 3.65 acre parcel comprised of two relatively level pads separated by a steep slope, and stepping up from west to east. 2. Adjacent General Plan Desiqnations (please see Exhibit A) North: South: East: West: Public-Quasi Public low-Medium Density Residential low-Medium Density Residential Public-Quasi Public 3. Adjacent Zoninq and land Use (please see Exhibit B) North: South: East: West: R-1 Bonita Vista High School R-1 Church R-1 Church R-1 Southwestern College 1 It should be noted that approval of the applicant's request would require adopt i on of the Mitigated Negative Decl arat ion, Monitori ng Program and Addendum prepared under IS-90-13. I ~ B..- J Page 3, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 DI SCUSS ION: The current proposals are essentially the same as those filed in July 1986 under GPA-86-6 and PCZ-86-E. At that time, the applicant's existing College Plaza center (located 1400 ft. south of the subject site) was not fully developed and in a state of decline, and the Bonita Pointe Plaza at the northwest corner of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road was yet to be buil t. Additionally, with the General Plan Update underway, and several adjacent large development projects in their initial phases, concern was that determination of need for a third neighborhood retail center might be premature. Staff and the Planning Commission concurred that revitalization and development of the two centers, respectively, should be prerequisite to further consideration of establishing additional retail uses in the Southwestern College area. Since that time, several sign ifi cant changes have occurred wh i ch i nfl uence evaluation of the current proposals. These changes include revitalization of the 5.29 acre College Plaza, development of the 10.56 acre Bonita Pointe Plaza, residential growth in the surrounding area, and significant policy and land use changes through adoption of the General Plan Update in 1989. With regard to the General Plan Update, in addition to the designation of substantial additional urban development area in the Eastern Territories, Section 7.2 of the Land Use Element establ ished several "Community Activity Centers" intended to provide a variety of community support facil ities and services (see Exhibit C). The subject site lies within the "Southwestern College Activity Center, which includes the area in the vicinity of the intersect i on of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road. The General Pl an states, "Community Activity Centers are sub-centers of the general plan area that provide a variety of community support facilities and services. They are not exc 1 us i ve 1 y commun ity reta il centers and may i nc 1 ude higher dens ity residential, employment, education, health care, recreation and other public and private services." Special consideration should be given to land use decisions within these centers to ensure that an appropriate land use balance, diversity anD compatibility exists. This is especially true of the subject site, given its central location, and adjacency to the college, high school, and other retail commercial centers. As part of the applicant's request, the applicant's planning consultant, P & D Technologies (Appendix 1), compiled a General Plan goal and objective consistency analysis. According to this analysis, the principal rationale for the subject request is that the site is inherently best suited for retail commercial use because it fronts on two major streets, and is located within an estab 1 i shed "Act i vi ty Center" of the General Pl an. The Pl an Amendment is justified by: Increased retail needs presented by adjacent residential growth. Air quality improvement resulting from reduced vehicular travel given the site's location in proximity to residential neighborhoods, and on the "homeward bound" travel route of many area residents. Also the site's location at the hub of bus, bike, and pedestrian routes all ows for use of alternate transportation promoted by the General Plan. )~.8'3 Page 4, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 Traffic and resultant noise make the site poorly suited for residential development, and that potential use of walls for noise mitigation would render the prominent site visually inferior, and conflict with goals for the H Street and Otay lakes Road scenic corridors. ANALYSIS General Plan Amendment In the report to the Planning Commission, based on the Special Study exami nat i on (see Appendix 2), staff recommended that the appl i cant's request for a Retail Commercial Plan Designation be denied and recommended alternatively that the Professional and Administrative Commercial Plan Designation be applied. However, the Planning Commission did not agree with staff recommendation, and recommended the Retail Commercial General Plan Designation. In taking this action, the Commission cited the following conclusions: 1) the Eastern Territories is currently underserved by local retail commercial development compared to other parts of Chula Vista, 2) the Southwestern College Area needs add it i on a 1 reta il commerc i a 1 development to serve ne i gh borhood needs, and 3) the market for office commercial development is uncertain, and is believed to be poor in this area. In order to cl arify staff's concerns on these issues, and respond to the points made by the Planning Commission, the following analysis is provided: 1. AMOUNT OF EASTERN TERRITORIES COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT The Chula Vista General Plan land Use Element contains the following information on projected buildout population and amount of retail commercial acreage for different portions of the City: Reta i 1 Retail Commercial Buildout Commerc i a 1 Acres per Pooulations Acreaqe 1.000 Pooulation Total 209,600 934 4.4 Central Chula Vista & Bayfront 53,500 246 4.6 Montgomery 49,800 317 6.4 Sweetwater 48,700 117 2.4 Eastern Territories 57,700 254 4.4 The figures above include regional, community, and neighborhood-serving retail commercial acreage. As this table shows, the existing General Plan allocates retail commercial acreage in the Eastern Territories in I ~B- If Page 5, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 direct proportion to the City-wide average. Cumulatively, acreage to population ratios are adequate and well balanced, and would not be significantly affected by the 3.65 acres associated with the subject proposal. 2. NEIGHBORHOOD NEEDS As mentioned, the above acreage to population ratios include regional, community, and neighborhood serving allocation rates. In accordance with 1 and use pl anni ng criteri a documented by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and other accepted planning standards, 1 acre/l000 population ratio has been used to evaluate the adequate allocation of neighborhood servinq commerc i a 1 use with in a servi ce area defi ned by conven i ence and access (generally a 1 to 1-1/2 mile radius). Based upon distances to other commercial centers and accessibility presented by circulation patterns, staff performed a neighborhood retail needs analysis. The Southwestern College Area that would logically be served by an additional neighborhood convenience center 1 ies within a 1 to 1.5 mile radius of the East H Street/Otay Lakes Road intersection, and includes a majority of Rancho Del Rey SPA I, all of SPA III, Bonita Long Canyon, Bonita Ridge Estates, Encore Bonita, and the larger College Estates area. The EastLake and Otay Ranch projects were not included as they are beyond a reasonable neighborhood service area, and designate a variety of commercial areas within their master plans. Approximately 5,500 existing and proposed dwelling units were encompassed within the service area, which, based on the 1990 Census average household size of 2.8, represents about 15,400 residents. The existing 16 acres of neighborhood commercial use contained in Bonita Pointe Plaza and College Plaza compares favorably with the 15.4 acres resulting from application of ULI criteria and indicates that needs are and will be adequately met. Additionally, both of these centers are conveniently located in direct proximity to the subject site, and contain in excess of 30 retail establishments providing a well balanced mix of goods and services sufficient to meet local commercial needs including restaurants, beauty shops, bank, 1 aundromat, drug store, and major grocery markets. Given ULI allocation standards, and use mixes within the existing centers, the need for additional convenience retail is questionable. A center of 3.65 acres woul d not attract a major anchor tenant complementary to those in the area, but rather would probably be comprised of miscellaneous smaller uses similar to those in the existing centers. Such redundancy could lead to future vacancy and/or decline in the existing centers. 3. SITE PLANNING ISSUES/SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE ACTIVITY CENTER In addition to the question of long-term need for a third neighborhood reta il center in th is 1 ocat ion, there is also concern over the creat i on of an appropriate land use balance within the Southwestern College 1~8-.5 Page 6, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 Activity Center. The site's location at the intersection of East H Street and Otay lakes Road, in proximity to Southwestern College and Bonita Vista High School, means that the development of this property will have a strong influence on the overall character of this activity center. Given projected traffic volumes and accessibility by bus, bike, and pedestrian systems, this intersection is envisioned to become a busy public node. As proposed, development of a retail center will result in juxtapos it i on of retail and educat i ona 1 uses on the four corners of the intersect ion, and create a seri es of centers in close proxi mi ty along Otay lakes Road. Wh il e not expressly proh i bited by the General P1 an, thi s 1 and use arrangement may not be the most des i rab1 e for an area specifically designated to be an important community focal point, with a diversity of civic, business and/or cultural uses. 4. OFFICE COMMERCIAL MARKET local sources indicate that a recent downturn in the office market is primarily attributable to unfavorable lending conditions which require greater developer equity and significant pre-leasing guarantees to obtain financing. This comes as an result of overbuilding and devaluation of offi ce commerc i a 1 propert i es caused by the more 1 en i ent 1 end i ng environment and favorable tax laws of the mid-80's, and impacts both new ventures and lease-up rates in completed projects. Currently, a fair amount of office space is available within Eastern Chu1a Vista, including approximately 24,000 square feet in the Bonita Pointe Professional Building located on the northern edge of the Activity Center adjacent to Bonita Vista Junior High School. The current tenant, North Island Federal Credit Union, will be relocating to EastLake at the end of the year. Wh il e th is space, coupled with potent i a 1 add it i ona 1 offi ce uses allowed within a retail commercial zone, would be adequate to meet short tern demands in the area, longer term needs are still in question. As previously indicated, the level of traffic projected for the intersection p1 ace the site at a strategi c community access poi nt. Whil e the Bonita Pointe Professional Building is within the Activity Center, it does not serve th is predomi nant focal role. Prov is i on for development of offi ce or other ci vi c and education uses all owed under the Profess i ona 1 and Administrative Commercial designation could be supported by the additional population, and would be well located to provide a balance of uses at the Activity Center's core. CONCLUSIONS General Plan Amendment Staff recommends denial of the applicant's request for Retail Commercial Land Use designation on this property for the following reasons: 1. Appropriately sized and well sited retail centers either exist or are planned which adequately meet the needs in the Eastern Territories, and within the service area of the Southwestern College Activity Center. J:l8-" .^_...._..~--...--.-."...._,~."...,.~.""^'"."U,~~___...,_........-~_,_..._.<~._._-.-.._~._,-- Page 7, Item Meeting Date 8/27/91 2. Development of this site with a retail commercial center would not promote the overall character which is envisioned in the General Plan for the Southwestern College Activity Center. Therefore, it is staff's recommendation that this site be redesignated in the General Plan to "Professional and Administrative Commercial", with companion rezoning to "C_Q_P". Zonino For reasons discussed above relative to the proposed General Plan amendment, staff is also recommending denial of the applicant's request to rezone to C-C-P, and proposes the C-Q-P zone in conjunction with the Professional and Administrative Commercial land use designation. The C-Q-P zone provides for 1 and uses wh i ch are cons i stent wi th those prescri bed by the General Pl an for Community Activity Centers. The precise plan requirements will ensure that development on the site will achieve an efficient and proper relationship with adjacent uses, and is required to be applied to those properties along scenic corridors such as E. H Street and Qtay Lakes Road. Supplemental findings for appl ication of the "P" modifier and specific guidelines, contained in Appendix 3 to this report, are recommended for adoption in conjunction with the C-Q-P zoning for this site. If the City Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning Commi ss ion, and redes i gnates the site to II Reta il Commerc i a 1 , II with compan ion zoning of "C-C-P", staff would recommend that direction be given to any specific site planning or design issues which it would like to have addressed in the lip" modifier guidelines for the site. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. WPC 9688P '26-7 ,GENERAL PLAN DESIGNA nONS ))'r,::,::::1 - ._ ~ED ~~REa..11 .wac) L ...1 IlEDiHlBH DENSITY REa. (11-18.wac) GPA::90~ 1.-=PCZ-90-B_ LOW DENSITY REa. co-a dulac) J,pW/MED DENSITY REa. (8-e ~~ CHANGE.F-BOM -a.OW /MED RES. DENSITY~ ~- . - - ~ - ~.AND-R~~LZONING. _TO -BET AIL ~.OMMER-CJAL~ RETAL -EXHIBIT A --- - --- _. -- .~. -- . I th .. a "leer t:nY OF.~. .. WlRTA Pl..AltHING DEPT.-ADVANCE OW. 818181 C.COVARRUBIAS 200' am ItJf~ta ',,' 'f: JlllBLIC & QUASI PUBLIC OPEN SPACE .00' B ~ 7 ~...... dreV2 .r; 2 SF. ~.\ ~ D~ . \ NQ ~y~~ l( \fP J7 =~ ~ ~~A~ ~ . ~ ~ . :-1\\~ 05- . \/ ~\:-~S~~ / \- _ ~ ~ i.~......- ~ . t~~~ BA.N ~J "" \J\S1" ~::') ~ .0'" ~ ) O.:C~~~ ~ MF J.:( I~ VAC ,":[.-. RETAIL ..' "~:'~,~~':'~~~~~:;~",. \. ~ "\ ~~~, ...'r~...,.....,;~ ~. ("(r~I!' ~ ...,';~~~:~-~..~-. j:r~:!/t;';r\:'~,~":~' - '-~.!,~ '::~ ;-[;.-~. CCP '" ~'J,rit "", ...'.... ; PC """\.~.~.... ~..;t,~.~,r!#.. "'~.' L ':'~""'~'"'~"". .- t" p~RK(, ~.':'.:~~-':";';"">.:' ',:"...~.:.:'::;:: ~7 . 'I . , ( ...... .~_..............l~.. ~::,. ~f';'fi -\ ,S'_f ~. ~J.....:.-.~...-..;;,,,...... ""."..... .....-=--...... -', (-A", rN . I r .~. .... . ....' ~ " ' /' ... >(("..(rt!"~(\ ,,'" . ~~~~if~;:' . L SUBJECT SITE ~:J CONDOS (, \r:J v. ;" \\ . ~"\.r '8 _ ,';:~ \) ttJ#\"~ t :t? ~ ~ ~ ';';';." ,....." ~ ~ ~..~ ~ V"......... ~+~ ~ }o . ~1 ~ ~, ~- ~~ ~~ on"". SFTh~j l~~" \..~!r..J rox':. ~ ~t:\ ~~~~~\:\ PC, ~ ... ~ ~@ ~ 1,: ~ 0)' -., ff}l~ ,I "\........ ~ ~ ~~~~~\ \...... _F'~ ~~ ~ ... u-r1", \ Q -, ~1 ~ ~~q:: - -;-- -.j := EO" ~~ I VAC "\ J, IV \ SF"' I- I ~O~a "'of "0 ,....... 'f() .~ "- ~ 1 1 - \ ~ 11 '.~ I I ~ -~~ ~l~~ Q~ .~ ~,fO l:::;)~() ~() · .~< ~ 'O~ ~"t. ..,: <:0 . oOcy(:::;O l\f~~ / () (::) 0 t::::> L ~.-::U \ Co.i 0 <::J ~ - -v,- - 8 f ZONING & LAND US.E 1 . ~,,~ ~~~:!:W~ED RES. DENSITY" .. GPA AND ~1 ZONING- TO ~ETAL COMMERCIAL- -90-01 I '2~'" PCZ-90-B ....SEC OTAY LAKES RD. &. E. H ST. ...,j \ '8 .~ b c )0- ~ -i ~ o i ";I( ~ 8 ~ ~ :> CJ '= a ~ )( u.l ....;,... ~ ,. " . ~tI ... ~ g E u.. co '- C) o '- D- C CD E g- -- CD ~ o ~ CD (/) .::> '"0 c: ;3 '"0 CD (/) o 0. o '- 0- .. ,~~ Q) '(l) ~ (f) :c . "V> ~ ~ ::>> i 5 \ 8 ~~ o .,.. Q.~ i~ \u; (/) ~i i! t \t~.. " .~ ITEM NUMBER: I~ RESOLUTION NUMBER: I' ~ a(" ORDINANCE NUMBER: OTHER: ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE WAS CONTINUED FROM DATE: g /-20/ t:t J (AGENDA PACKET SCANNED AT ABOVE DATE) ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO DATE: MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION: /~ August 15, 1991 To: From: Via: What: Where: How: Why: Facts: Advantages: Chula Vista City Council Will W. Gildner Leonard Moore, Chula Vista City Councilmember Create a new location for San Diego's Regional International Airport. At present site of NAS Miramar, San Diego, California. Move all base activities and tenant squadrons now present at NAS Miramar to George Air Force Base site (Victorville, California). To solve a perplexing problem for the Metropolitan San Diego area and to maintain an economic platform for the Victorville area. 1. George AFB, Victorville, California is scheduled to close as an active duty operating base in early 1992. 2. George has all the equipment and physical structures required to operate a jet fighter aircraft base. 3. San Diego representatives have been for many years, and cur- rently are, searching for a new location for a regional airport as a replacement for Lindbergh Field. 4. NAS Miramar has many of the required facilities already in place to operate a commercial airport. A. Cost Savings George APE switched to a Naval Air Station. 1. Save several hundred millions of "shut down" dollars. 2. Save all security, depreciation and maintenance dollars that would otherwise be required in the future. Miramar converted to a commercial airport. 1. Save more hundreds of millions of dollars needed to con- struct a new airport. 2. Necessary time to put into operational use is kept to a minimum, thus many additional dollar savings. 3. Eliminate the dollars and time wasted in additional fea- sibility studies. 4. Possible lease of land from Department of Defense, thus saving taxpayer dollars required to purchase land and Page 2. surrounding air space from private ownership adequate for a regional airport . B. Location George AFB 1. The base is about the same distance from San Nicolas Island as is Miramar (aircraft carriers conduct air operations in the vicinity of the island). It is considerably closer to operations of carriers home ported in San Francisco Bay area. The flight distance and direction to MCAS Yuma and NAF EI Centro, including the desert bombing ranges, are compatible from base.. 2. Base operating areas remain intact, thus retaining local training air space. 3. High desert location lends itself to great flying weather and environment. 4. Personnel living conditions on base are equal to or better than Miramar. 5. Maintains an established and qualified working force and cash flow for area residents. NAS Miramar. 1. Considered by many as the best location for an regional international airport. Certainly, the only one where a new airport, with all of the problems involved, does not have to be constructed. 2. Centrally situated for all of San Diego County residents. 3. In the middle of expanding San Diego light and "clean" industrial area and business centers. 4. More vacant land than any other possible site for future industrial and commercial development and for buffer zones from residential developments. C. Physical Aspects. George AFB 1. All necessary operational buildings, hangers, engine overhaul, fuel supply and storage, sewage, electrical and water systems are installed. 2. All administrative buildings and facilities available. 3. As much, if not more, on-base personnel housing. 4. An IS-hole golf course and all other recreational facilities on base. Page 3. 5. Would not have to "secure" and close the base and, thus, have to meet government environmental requirements. 6. Excellent runway orientation. 7. Taxiways, aprons, parking ramps all more than adequate to handle any U. S. Navy aircraft. NAS Miramar 1. Water, sewer, electrical, fuel supply systems are all installed and operating. 2. Runways, taxiways, aprons, parking ramps in and ade- quate to operate all commercial aircraft in use today. 3. Satisfactory aircraft control tower. 4. All approach control and instrument landing devices and communications systems for commercial aircraft in and operating. 5. Expansive area to the east for aircraft approaches. 6. Many existing buildings to be leased or sold for private commercial activities. 7. An 18-hole golf course for the public. 8. Railroad available (close-by, if "spurs" not already in place). 9. Perfect extension of S.D. trolley from University Towne Center station (yet to be built) to airline terminal. Disadvantages: George AFB 1. None NAS Miramar 1. Have to move a long established Naval Air Station. But it has been done before. 2. None for the City and County of San Diego residents; only benefits for them and all taxpayers. While this a new concept and proposal to a complicated situation, I feel it has exceptional merit and, if developed, would create the best regional international airport San Diego County could ever expect to have related to cost and location. ... ... ... ... ... ...... League of California Cities 1400 K STREET . SACRAMENTO, CA 95814 . (916) 444-5790 California Cities Work Together Sacramento, CA July 11, 1991 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Don Benninghoven, Executive Director Re: Designation of Voting Delegate for League Annual Conference Dear City Official: This year's League Annual Conference is scheduled for October 13-16 in San Francisco. One very important aspect of the Annual Conference is the General Business Session at which time the membership takes action on conference resolutions. Annual Conference resolutions guide cities and the League in our efforts to improve the quality, responsiveness and vitality of local government in California. All cities should be represented at the Business Session on Tuesday, October 15, at 1:30 p.m. at the Hilton Hotel. To expedite the conduct of business at this important policy-making meeting. each City Council should designate a voting representative and an alternate who will be present at the Business Session. The League Constitution provides that each city is entitled to one vote in matters affecting municipal or League policy. A voting card will be given to the city official designated by the City Council on the enclosed "voting delegate form." If the Mayor or a member of the City Council is in attendance at the Conference, it is expected that one of these officials will be designated as the voting delegate. However, if the City Council will not have a registered delegate at the Conference but will be represented by other city officials, one of these officials should be designated the voting delegate or alternate. Please forward the enclosed ''voting delegate form" to the Sacramento office of the Leag...c at the earliest possible time (not later than Friday. September 20. 1991), so that proper records may be established for the. Conference. The voting delegate may pick up the city's voting card at the League Registration Area in the Hilton Hotel. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Com..rnittee to make the exchange. An outline of the voting procedures that will be followed at this conference is printed on the reverse side of this memo. It is suggested that the Mayor and an Council Members from a given city try to sit together at the Business Session so that, if amendments are considered, there may tie an opportunity to exchange points of view and arrive at a consensus before the city's vote is <::ast. Your cooperation in returning the attached "voting delegate ferm" as soon as PO~;;! appreciated. lloq- / (~\ r ~ '~ut9-~~;f ~ .~~ League of California Cities Annual Conference Voting Procedures 1. Each member city has a right to cast one vote on matters pertaining to League policy. 2. To cast the city's vote a city official must have in his or her possession the city's voting card and be registered with the Credentials Committee. 3. Prior to the Annual Conference, each city should designate a voting delegate and an alternate and return the Voting Delegate Form to the League for use by the Credentials Committee. 4. The voting delegate or alternate may pick up the city's voting card at the voting delegates' desk in the conference registration area. 5. Free exchange of the voting card between the voting delegate and the alternate is permitted. 6. If neither the voting delegate nor alternate is able to attend the Business Session, the voting delegate or alternate may pass the voting card to another official from the same city by appearing in person before a representative of the Credentials Committee to make the exchange. 7. Qualification of an initiative resolution is judged in part by the validity of signatures. Only the signatures of city officials, who, according to the records of the Credentials Committee, are authorized to use the city's voting card and who have left a sample of their signature on the Credentials Committee register will be approved. 8. In case of dispute, the Credentials Committee will determine the right of a city official to vote at the Business Session. )'Q -;( ( File No. PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE ~ iJ-~J L) \ Iqc1 I SUBJECT r ~ '" J ..\.:;, ~C-.~~ C~\ tJ q'h~"-~Y ()-~-v-' \ \ LOCATION SENT TO STAR. NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX ~; BY HAND ; BY MAIL ')/1'-1 {C;r - - PUBLICATION DATE MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS '{~~ NO. MAILED f~ c:!tt:-?--L--~J- PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122 'tJ I ~ /q I LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK COPIES TO: Administration (4) v/ Planning ,/" Originating Department Engineering v/ Others City Clerk's Office (2) ,,/ POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS ./ 5!;/ <t, lei \ SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: ( -58- NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHUIA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Consideration of G P A-91-03, PCZ-91- E: City-Initiated proposal to amend the City General Plan, from Research and Limited Manufacturing to Retail Commercial, for certain territory, generally bounded by Main Street to the north, Broadway (Beyer Boulevard) to the east, Faivre Street to the south, and 27th Street to the west. Also requested is an amendmet to the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research and Limited Industrial to Mercantile and Office Commercial, and a rezone from City-adopted County Zone classification C-37 to City classification C-T-P. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, August 27, 1991, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: AUGUST 8, 1991 FILE NO.: PB-027 Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk . _~~___.~.~~.......~_,~___~_____"___._.~_.o..'"______ DATE: 8-7-91 TO: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk FROM: Nancy Ripley, Planning Department SUBJECT: Referral from Planning Commission meeting of July 10, 1991 Please schedule the following for Council consideration at the meeting of August 27. 1991 Forwarded herewith: Public Hearing Notice(s) and Mailing List(s). Forthcoming: Resolution(s) PH GPA-91-03, PCZ-91-E: City-Initiated proposal to amend the City General Plan, from Research and Limited Manufacturing to Retail Commercial, for certain territory, generally bounded by Main Street to the north, Broadway (Beyer Boulevard) to the east, Faivre Street to the south, and 27th Street to the west. Also requested is an amendment to the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research and Limited Industrial to Mercantile and Office Comemrcial, and a rezone from City-adopted County Zone classification C-37 to City classification C-T-P NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, for consideration of adoption of a Negative Declaration under IS-91-33, an amendment to the Chula Vista General and Montgomery Specific Plan, and a companion rezoning for a 1.86 acre area located at the southwest corner of Main Street and Broadway, and further bounded by 27th Street to the west and Faivre Street to the south. The above act ions i nvo 1 ve amendment of the 1 and use diagram of the City General Pl an from "Research and Limited Manufacturing" to "Retail Commercial", and amendment of the 1 and use des i gnat i on of the Montgomery Spec i fi c Pl an from "Research and Limited Industrial" and "Special Study" to "Mercantile and Office Commercial". Rezoning is from the City-adopted County "C37" - Heavy Commercial zone to the City's "CTP" - Commercial Thoroughfare zone with Precise Plan. An Initial Study, IS-91-33, of possible significant environmental impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator. A finding of no significant environmental impact has been recommended, and is on file along with the Initial Study in the office of the Planning Department. A copy of the staff report and recommendation regarding the Plan amendments and rezoning is also on file for review. If you wish to challenge the City's action on these matters in court, you may be 1 imited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD on Tuesday, August 27, 1991, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue. Any person desiring to be heard may appear at this meeting. DATED: August 6, 1991 CASE NOS: GPA-91-03, PCZ-91-E Beverly Authelet, City Clerk WPC 9619P ~~~ ~~~ ~-...,;;~- ---- ---- OlY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY CLERK TELECOPIER COVER LETTER TELECOPIER # (619) 691-5171 TO: STAR NEWS - LEGALS FIRM: STAR NEWS TELECOPIER NO: dQ L C\) 426-6346 PHONE NO.: c1p r:l ) 427-3000 FROM: CHULA VISTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE DATE: ~~ C'''\ lc1Q \ \ TIME: DOCUMENT(S) BEING SENT: r $<- (~ ~ TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE: 2- WE ARE TRANSMITTING AT FOLLOWING SPEED: 4 MINUTES 6 MINUTES FAST STANDARD IF ALL PAGES ARE NOT RECEIVED, PLEASE CALL (619) 691-5041 AND ASK FOR: LaRk) A a J I~., IqCJt CvJ~c4~ o ' PUBLISH ON: 276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010/(619) 691-5041 -, -. "_'~",. ---., I'E:/=:;AGE CCiljF 1 F'r'lAT I C)tj AUG-Og-'91 FRI 10:19 TEF'r'l I [i: C I T'I IIF CHULA I!I=:.TH F'.--'~'31313 TEL tH::: : FeA>: 61 '3 (,'31 S ~ ',' 1 L+~I:E--l"' :=-l:.-Tli'lE--[TCJTf-iT-j rUe: """f ------ ---ii;-'- L1::::~~~"i:';-" t"_:J1El:3 ~~~[~(::~~~1~5~'~c4_ :_- "~~~l':, 4~t-=-" G:3".iE"'"- DEF'T '_[I[i[ eLl ~jf_~~E~~~ l I .J I I \0 I III L. _____ ~ I I I , I . I . 1 I '- - - -l- - - -- -:- - - - - Ti- I' I I: I : I I : : 1 , I , I I 1 r..J I 1 I I j-- -.., 1 I 1 I L____J t, I I 1 I I , I r- --I I I . I I I , I , . (I) <( :> o <.> <( .., FAIVRE I I ~ I I I I 1 I I I/) a: _ -l I I I !.._--~ I I J J I I I ", . ___L. ---r-- - T---I I I I I I I I ,SUBJ II) <t ::J ii5 CT AREA I I I . I' I I I I 1" - - -~ - - ,- - r - - T - , : I I I I , I : ~ I f , I I I , I o MAIN STREET I I \ I I I , I I I I 1- -1____ I I I I I I I I" - .1. _ _ L- _ _ _ _ -- -- CITY CITY Of OF CHULA SAN OTAY FARMS-SPECIAL STUDY AREA PROPOSED GENERAL/SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT a REZON~G GPA-91-03 : PCZ-91-E : IS-91-33 SITE OF EXISTHG MARKET LOCATOR 'l/fi/ ~/// AREA OF PROPOSED RELOCATION & EXPANSION, _ EXISTING SPECIAL STUDY AREA t j o FEET I 400' CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPT.- ADVANCE OIV.-8J5J91 C. COVARRUBIAS } 1J: I I I I I I . . . I I oJ I I L I I I I I I ...... ........ . :i:~";;~;;~';::::;::I~::"..;,;;;1;;'.;>,. .'.::t:rrv.. ,.,.,.,...... aTY .J L___ I . . I I I . . , ~*~l~~\ij\j\j\j\~~m~~\~~~\\\\\\ :.:.:.:.:.:.:....:::::::: ::::::.:. ~)-:.: .:: i~m~~~~~~~~i~t~f:i~~~ij~~i: : :~~~\\\l\~~$\ljjj~~\~~j\!jj\\\n~~;: '.:,.:.:.:.:.:,:.:.:.:.:.:.:. e._. .:.:.. 'I : : : : : : . · · · · . . .~. .a. ... _ __ L .T~J [, 'M". \:::~; w.. :iit~l ..,.,..: :. .'j:'.:::'! :..:.';;Gt.+, ...,., ':~:,:, .. .:::. .::-: .:;.:: :::f.:fr::... :.;':~:.~.;.;., .... .:.;. . . .~. ~~;\:: :'::\~" .::::><j:':' .~~;:~::~:::::::::{;::::: ':~":.: .c. OF ,::,'*;~....... __TY ..~ t...;.111UD.ICIFME oc -",aAL IIllIJ RI1'AL ~.I!RClAl c:::J IIIIIIoACH AND LMTID IOJITIIAL 1.:"l>':,:'.'1 MfICS AliI) 0PBiI tIPACE OlAY MARKET GFA-91-3 CHANGE nOM RESEARCH AND LIMITED MANUFACTURING TO RETAIL' .COMMERCIAL N .. EXHIBIT A ICAU!: 1-. GJ' LklTlERI.MdNIYRE AND ASSOCIATES .., ~ . . . I 1- ) " 'J I , . I po--- I I ____ .I I -~ , . I I-L-P 1..__ . . . - I I I I . I I I I , I R-2-P ___L. ___ . I I I I · . . I · ., . . . .' , L.J I . I I-l-P 04 , II I I . I j...... . I I I CiT~ . .J . L..~... . I . . -, mr-V-Al . . I . I Q!NTER , MAlt -of 1R 'AI\fM , ' I I of I I , , , , I I ~ NUTIIAL I . I I-.P 1: - _I.. _I. _ __ ___ ---- I I , I I I , - -;.1---- CITY CITY OF 'OF - ---------- -.-- ~ I-l- - -- -., I ---- VISTA -- DEGO . , . . ~TAY MARKET pez 91-E EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE CHANGE FROM C-37 TO C-T-P N' . EXHIBIT B.: . SCAIJ!: 1-. 400' LErl1ERI.MdNTYRE AND AsSOCIATES I { ." , ATTACHMENT 1 SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS FOR APPLICATION OF .p. MODIFIER Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 1956.041, the .p. modifying district is applied based on the following: 1. The subject property, or neighborhood or area in which the property is located, is unique by virtue of topography, geological characteriStics, access, configuration, traffic circulation or some social or historic situation requiring special handling of the development on a precise plan basis. The subject property, being basically three-sided and located at the southwest corner of Broadway and Main Street, is impacted by the traffic circulation associated with this intersection. It is further impacted by . the location of 27th Street .on its western boundary. Precise Plan approval will ensure that development of the parcel considers the various traffic engineering required for these streets and that safe and adequate ingress and egress is provided. 2. The property or area to which the .p. modifying district is applied is an area adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the development of a precise plan will allow the area so designated to coexist between land uses which might otherwise prove incompatible. Zoning to the west and east of the subject parcels is Light Industrial. The precise plan requirement will help create a development that is compatible with the existing and future industrial uses by providing adequate buffers and landscaped areas. 3. The basic or underlying zone regulations do not allow the property owner and/or the City the appropriate control or flexibility needed to achieve an efficient and proper relationship among the uses allowed in the adjacent zones. The underlying zone of C- T (Thoroughfare Commercial) provides for the establishment of commercial activities catering to thoroughfare traffic. Typical uses include retail commercial, entertainment, automotive and other appropriate "highway related" activities. Given the subject parcel's location illlllediately adjacent to an industrial zone, not all uses associated with the C-T zone may be appropriate. The .P" modifier will allow the owner.and the City to consider uses under the Precise Plan .and further detail the types and development of uses consistent with the surrounding land uses. WPC 9484P . U~"~"'::""!I~l'~~ 1\ !'1 ,.." "''"''''''' ,,~~~ U\J~ii'..~U--.;;;LL..-.:..~ j,;'oI....~.J\w.....:;.. Liu MINUTES OF A MEETING OF ~E MQRTGOMERY PLARBING COMMITTEE CHOU VISTA, CA 7:00 p.m. Wednesday. July 3. 1991 Lauderbach Community Center 333 Oxford st.. Chula Vista The meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Chairman Wheeland, Commdttee members Castro, Berlanga, Roberts, Platt, Palmer (arrived late) McFarlin with notification Associate Planner Frank J. Herrera-A, Assistant Planner Ed Batchelder, Principal Planner Gordon Howard, Environmental Planner Doug Reid, Planning Consultant Mary May, Planning Technician Patty Smith APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion (Castro/Roberts) (6-0) to approve the minutes of the May 15, 1991 meeting, corrected to note that representatives of California Transportation Ventures were unable to name any local groups that were in favor of the SR 125 plan when asked to do so. Motion (Castro/Berlanga) (6-0) to approve the minutes of the June 5, 1991 meeting, corrected to read that on page 3, it was Associate Planner Herrera-A who stated, in response to an inquiry by member Castro, that Mission Auction will move to Otay Mesa. OLD BOSINESS: Chairperson Wheeland asked when a report would be forthcoming from the City's Engineering department? Mr. Herrera-A stated that Mr. Ouadah had originally planned to report back at the second meeting of this month, but as there would be no regular second meeting he would instead present his report at the August 7th meeting. Member Castro asked when the auto auction was supposed to be leaving? Mr. Herrera-A responded that the auction was scheduled to move by the beginning of this "month, and that he would check with Carol Stinnet who was working on this to ascertain the status. Member Platt noted that the Marshall's Border Patrol was operating in this area, and that cars were being picked up but not actually auctioned here. Mr. Herrera stated that. this issue was be~ng looked into by the City Attorney as well as planning staff. It was noted that the currently permitted use of storage only is legal, but that a nuisance was being created. ~ Montgomery Planning Committee -2- July 3. 1991 PUBLIC BEARING: GPA-91-03. PCZ-91-3. City-initiated ~roposal to amend the City General Plan. amend the Montaomery Specific Plan. and rezone from County zone classification to City classification. Staff Presentation Assistant Planner Ed Batchelder informed the Committee that this item was the result of a referral from the City Council to expedite the processing of this portion of the-Special Study Area of the Montgomery Specific Plan. He reviewed the history of the site, noting that property owner Mr. Tamayo had owned the subject property for some 20 years, and had planned under County zoning to expand the current facilities. Mr. Tamayo expressed concern to the Council that if the area was rezoned to ILP, he would be unable to do so. In response to the Council's direction, planning staff hired the planning firm Lettieri-McIntyre to help expedite the planning report. Mary May, of LaTiere-McIntyre, reviewed the report for the Committee. She informed members that the subject site is located on the south- west corner of Main and Broadway, with access to the property taken from both Broadway and 27th Street. Property to the north was al ready zoned CTP; Ms. May stated that a rezone of this site.to CTP was thus consistent with existing adjacent zoning. Ms. May also noted that a rezoning of this site to ILP, while consistent with the Montgomery Specific Plan, may not have allowed expansion of the property's current grocery store facilities. She further indicated that the Montgomery Specific Plan calls for rehabilitation and revitalization for various neighborhood retail and grocery stores, and that the proposed CT zone is the City of Chula Vista zoning designation that most closely resembles the County zone that has existed on this site for a number of years. Additionally, the proposed Precise Plan requirement recommended would ensure that the development of both parcels would provide an adequate buffer between the commercial and adjacent industrial uses, and would address traffic concerns and proper ingress and egress. COMMITTEE RESPONSE/DISCUSSION ,- Chairperson Wheeland asked if Mr. Tamayo had submitted development plans? Ms. May responded that Mr. Tamayo's plans were still conceptual. Mr. Herrera-A added that these plans were approximately five years old, and that they had never been formally submitted to the County for review. Member Castro asked if the abandonment of 27th Street had been considered? Mr. Batchelder indicated that this option had been noted in the staff report, and that the Engineering Department's Traffic Division would be analyzing this possibility. Member Castro pointed out that this area could be used for parking. Member Berlanga added tha~ 27th Street presented a safety hazard, and that closing it might mitigate this. Mr. Herrera-A reminded members that this proposal was only for the General Plan and Specific Plan amendments, and that site development considerations would be anal fzed under implementation of the Precise Plan. Montaomery Plannina Committee -3- July 3. 1991 Wheeland 'asked why specific project information was not provided in the Initial study? Mr. Reid responded that this information was for specific development proposals only. Member Platt asked if buffer zones would still be sought, given the surrounding ILP zones? Mr. Herrera-A informed members that at the time the area was initially studied for the Specific Plan, the ILP zoning was seen as most appropriate for this area, and no buffering is being considered at this time. Chair Wheeland asked .if .there was anything to prevent this from becoming another vacant strip commercial pocket, to which Mr. Herrera-A responded that the existing market had been viable for the past 20 years; thus, this was not seen as a problem. Wheeland questioned the information received from the schools; Mr. Reid informed members that the pertinent sheets had the case number identified at the top of the page, and that other documents referred to a wider issue of school district-City interaction on rezonings. Member Palmer noted that the Planning Department has not kept up with current school situ~tions, and that as a result of the "schools of choi6e" policies, districts are no longer able to deny new students. Mr. Reid and Mr. Herrera-A both mentioned meetings between school district staff and City staff currently taking place in an effort to discuss relevant issues. Member Castro asked if the Negative Declaration was for the proposed plan and zoning changes only? Mr. Herrera-A responded affirmatively. Member Platt asked if the used auto sales would still be, allowed under the new zoning designation; Mr. Herrera-A responded that they would be, with a Conditional Use Permit. Chair Wheeland asked if specific projects would be presented to the Committee with Initial Studies? Mr. Herrera stated that they would. Motion (Castro/Roberts) (6-0) to accept the Negative Declaration as presented. Motion (Castro/Roberts) (6-0) to recommend approval of amendment of the General Plan from Light Industrial to Retail Commercial, and amendment of the Montgomery Specific Plan from Light Industrial to Mercantile and Office Commercial. Motion (Roberts/Platt) (6-0) to approve the rezone from C-37 to CTP. CHAIR REPORT: Chairperson Wheeland informed the Committee that she had attended the introductory meeting of the Citizens Advisory Committee to California ~ransportation Ventures, on SR 125, and that she had found it to be very unorganized and unimpressive. She stated that her impression was that CTV was not concerned with 'potential issues and problems that Chula Vista residents might raise, and that CTV, appeared to prefer that some discussions not be repeated outside of these committee meetings. She noted that most local elected officials had representatives in attendance, and that another meeting was scheduled for August. Chair Wheeland felt that it was made clear that this committee would have no impact upon CTV's decision making process. . - ., Montaomerv PlanninaCommittee -4- Julv 3. 1991 Palmer asked if this committee was bound by the provisions of the Brown Act? Mr. Herrera-A responded that if this was a public committee, they would be so bound; he suggested contacting CalTrans for further info~ation on this issue, as CalTrans had issued the contract with this company. Mr. Herrera stated that as member Castro had pointed out, continued discussion of this subject might itself represent violation of the Brown Act. He suggested that this topic could be placed as a standing agenda item to allow for discussion at any meeting. . COMMITTEE COMMENTS: Member Castro mentioned he had attended the Otay Valley Regional Park Ci tizen' s Advisory Commi ttee meeting. He and Mr. Herrera-A described presentations given on other regional parks and projects, such as those in Whittier, Long Beach, and Tempe, Arizona. Member Platt asked if rezones would be discussed in the future, to which Mr. Herrera-A responded that an Open Space ordinance for this area was currently being worked on. He noted however that funding constraints made it difficult to assess any time frames. Chair Wheeland asked about discussion of the committees merger; Mr. Herrera-A stated that this item had been postponed to the August 7 regular meeting so that Community Development Specialist Lance Abbott would be able to make a presentation. ADJOORNMENT: at 8:15 p.m. to the Special Meeting of Wednesday, July 10, 1991 at 6:00 p.m. in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 of the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Ave., Chula Vista, CA ~~ Patt Smith, Recorder . ,- ~ I ~ , I \'.. ~ ~ . Planning Commission -3- July 10, 1991 ITEM 1: PUBLIC HEARING: GPA-91-03, PCZ-91-E: CITY-INITIATED PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE CITY GENERAL PLAN, FROM RESEARCH AND LIMITED MANUFACI'URlNG TO RErAn.. COMMERCIAL, FOR CERTAIN TERRITORY, GENERALLY BOUNDED BY MAIN STREET TO TIlE NORTH, BROADWAY (BEYER BOULEVARD) TO THE EAST, FAIVRE STREET TO THE SOUTH, AND 27I'H STREET TO THE WEST. ALSO REQUESTED IS AN AMENDMENT TO THE MONTGOMERY SPECIFIC PLAN FROM RESEARCH AND LIMITED INDUSTRIAL TO MERCANTILE AND OFFICE COMMERCIAL, AND A REZONE FROM CITY-ADOPTED COUNTY ZONE CLASSIFICATION C-37 TO CITY CLASSIFICATIONC-T-P Associate Planner Batchelder noted that this item was a Council referral. At the November 13, 1990, public hearing on the Harborside B, Part 2 Rezoning for Montgomery, the property owner of the subject property had requested that Council defer from zoning the subject properties, since the proposed zoning to I-L-P would have precluded his intent to remodel and expand the Otay Farms Market. Council referred the item to staff for preparation of a wbrk program to expedite resolution of that portion of the special study area of the Montgomery Specific Plan. The work program had been approved at the Council meeting of December 4, 1990. ~. Batchelder stated that the Montgomery Planning Committee unanimously recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration; amendment of the City General Plan from Research and Limited Industrial to Retail Commercial, and amendment of the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research and Limited Manufacturing to Mercantile and Office Commercial; and to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance rezoning the site to the City's C-T-P zone. He then introduced Contract Planner May who summarized the report which had been prepared by the frrm of Lettieri-McIntyre. This included the location of the property, current uses, zoning, and staffs recommendations and reasonings for those recommendations. Commissioner Casillas asked if it was the applicant's intention to build a new market in the southern parcel. Ms. May answered affirmatively, and explained some of the plans of the applicant. Upon Commissioner Casillas' query, Associate Planner Batchelder said the applicant had given no time commitment and was not ready to come forth with a site plan. He had expressed his intent to propose a plan there. Commissioner Martin asked ,about the designation of the area underneath the vacant lot. Mr. Batchelder answered that at the time the Harborside B, Part 2 Rezonings were done in November, the area was designated at I-L-P, although there was a special study overlay extending south of Faivre Street. Chair Tugenberg asked if the applicant's plans, when submitted, would include the entire area. Mr. Batchelder answered affrrmatively. . .' Planning Commission -4- July 10, 1991 This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. MSUC (Ca!i:i11a~Catson) 4-0 (Commissioners Decker and Fuller absent) that based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration, find that this reclassification will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS- 91-33 for the Otay Market rezone. MSUC (Casi11n/Carson) 4-0 (Commissioners Decker and Fuller absent) to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution to change the General Plan designation to Retail Commercial, the Montgomery Specific Plan designation to Mercantile and Office Commercial, and adopt an ordinance changing the zone classification to C- T - P for the property as described on the attached Exhibit "A". MSUC (Carson/Martin) 4-0 (Commissioners Decker and Fuller absent) to recommend that the City Council adopt an ordinance changing the zone classification of the City-adopted County zoning C37 to the City's C-T-P, including the adoption of the supplemental findings supporting the P modifier as shown in Attachment 1. THE CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA PAR1Y DISCWSURE STATEMENT Statement of disclosure of certain d~ership interests, payments, or campaign contnbutions, o~ all matters -"- which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other .Jfficial bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. Ust the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. ~ : - 2. H any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership inter~)4 the partnership. I 3. H any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor o~ the trust. ,v/A I t Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes No -1- If yes, please indicate person(s): - - . 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, empl~yees, consultants or independent contractT ~hO you have assigned to represent )'OU before the City in this matter. I 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ N~ If yes, state which Councilmember( s): ~ Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and country, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit." Date: f-z 3-tf I (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) "' [A-l13\A:DISCLOSE.TXT] Hector J. Tamayo Print or type name of contractor/applicant [Revised: 11130190] : . ~ ~ ~ J ,f !i "","" ~- negative declaration ) PROJECT NAME: Otay Market SPA, SPA . Rezone PROJECT LOCATION: 1716 Broadway ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 629-040-01 and 629-010-01 PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Yista CASE NO: IS-91-33 DATE: June 3, 1991 A. Project Setting The project site is a 1.86 acre triangular-shaped parcel bounded by Main Street to. the north, Faivre Street to the south, ~7th Street to the west, and Broadway to the east. Current land uses on the parcel include a car lot, a s1ngle story aarket, and a flower stand.. . The surrounding area is aostly urb:\nlzed with a mixture of c01llnerc1al, office, and industrial land uses which wo'uld not be incompatible with Conmercial and Thoroughfare zoning. Adjacent land uses are a service station Ind thrift store to the east, In office building, motel, and auto parts store to the west, vacant land to the south, and Main Street and a variety of strip commercial uses to the north. B. proiect Description The proposed project 1s a request for an amendment to the General Plan designation from the existing Research and Limited Manufacturing to Thoroughfare COlllllercial, an amendment to the Land Use Element of the Montgomery Specific Plan from Research Ind Limited Industrial to Mercantile and Office Conrnerc1al, and a rezoning from the County's C37 zone to the City's Thoroughfare COIIIIlerc 1 a 1 zone with a Prec ise P1 an modifier. " . The amendments and the rezoning are to allow for the pOSSible future development of I commercial project consisting of such uses IS an .xpanded market incidental, offices, Ind hot food sales. Such I land use could have potentially significant impacts such IS traffic, noise, air quality, etc. Therefore, further environmental review would be necessary for Iny future development on this site It such time when site plans become Ivanlble.' Development of the parcels wnl .lso be subject to precise plan review. t. ~omDatibilftv wfthlonina and plans This project involves In amendment to the Senera' Plan Ind the Land Use Element of the Montgomery Specific Plan tOIHow a retan and office cOIIIJIercial use. The project would .1so require rezoning of the sfte ~'lt- . ---r- . ~~~-= ~~~~ chula Ylata RIInning department. O'f\' OF envlrOllftllenta' ....... ..etlftn OfUlA VlaA City of - - . .. : ( I \. -) -2- from the County's C37 zone to the City's Thoroughfare Comercia' zone with I Precise Plan ~difier.. These change$ in land use designation Ind zonfng would not be inconsfstent with the surrounding coanercial and limited industrill uses. . D. 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy require~ that fl." and ..dica' units must be Ible to respond to calls within 7 .inutes .or less .than 85% of the cases Ind within 5 .inutes or less in 751 of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,since the nearest fire station is 2 miles Iway and would be Issociated with a 5 minute respo~se t1... The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Fire Department requirements will be determined when site maps or building plans are submitted. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 .inutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.101 of Priority 2 calls within 7 .inutes or less Ind .a1nta1n In Iverage response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 .inutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold PoliCY. .The Police Department has indicated that it can maintafn In acceptable level of service. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards 'olicy requires that 111 intersections must operate at I Level of Service (LOS) .C. or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) -0- .ay occur durfng the peak . two hours of the day .at signal tzed intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate It I LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS -F. during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this poliCY. The proposed project will comply with this Thresbold Polley. The proposed plan amendments and rezoning actions will not.o1n and of themselves affect the Level of Service or Average Da11y Traffic. Future specific development proposals must ..et threshold standards. . ~ . .. -0 ".....-.... t , . ) -3.. Parks/Recreation The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l,OOO population. The proposed project win comply with this Threshold Policy. The Threshold/Standards policy only applies residential projects, thus, t~e project is exempt from this standard. Drainage The Threshold/Standards Pol icy "quires that stOI'll water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary illprovements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project w111 comply with this Threshold Policy. . . The proposed project would not cause threshold standards to be exceeded. A small strip of land along tne southern property line falls within the SOO-year flood plain. Future site development lIust ..et established engineering standards for surface drainage flow and drainage design. 6. Sewer 4. 5. . ~. , \- ) -4- E. Jdentification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the tity of thula Vista determined that the proposed project will not have a stgniftcan~ environmental effect, and the preparation of an Jnvirorunental Impact Report w111 not be required. A Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Sectton 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. . The following 1~acts have been determined to be less than s1gnif~cant. A discussion of each of these less thin significant impacts from the . proposed project follows. ~ineral s The tity's Initial Study indicates that there is a,potentl,l for access to sand and gravel resources, as the site is adjacent .to Otay River deposits. However, the site is presently developed and the potential for .'n'ng operations is considered .inimal. I~hools The Chula Yista City School district has expressed concerns regarding the need to .itigate impacts to school s caused by cOlllllerc1al development. Students generated from the future development of the proposed s1te could impact Mueller, Montgomery, Lauderbach, and Palomar school s. (Specific schools impacted varies with the ava11abi11ty of space). The tity currently requires .itigat10n of the effects of non-residential development through the payment of a developer fee or participation in a Coanunity Facil ily District. Specific .it1gation aust be quantified and .. assessed at the time when a particular development project is proposed. Payment of school fees will be required prior to issuance of a building penn1t. .Hill!: ",.~- Due to recent drought condit10ns, as a cond1t10n of project approval, the applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservat10n or fee off-s1te .program the ~ity of Chula Yista has in effect at the ti.. of bUild1ng perm1t issuance. F. lUJjaation necessary to avoid sianificant effects The proposed project is not associated with any significant or potentially significant environmental impacts, therefore, no project specific .itigation will be required. I. findinas of Insianificant ImDact Based on. the following findings, it is determined that the project. described above win not have a significant environmental impact and no .nvi ronmenta 1 impact report needs to be' prepared. ; . " ( . . ) -5- The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environllent, substantially reduce the habitat of. a fish or' wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliainate a plant or btllal co.unity, reduce the au.ber or nstrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or aninl, or .liainate taportant Ruples of the -.Jor periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project does not have the potential to impact any rare or endangered species or the habitat any sensitive plant or animal . species since the site 1s currently developed and in a disturbed state. The project has the potential to achieve short-te1"ll environaental goals to the disadvantage of long-te1"ll envtron.ental goals. The lroposed General and Spec t fi c Plan amendments and, zone change woul not result In any environment effects which would advrrsely fmpact short- or long-term environmental goals. Future develo;>ment on the site will be subject to further review to ensure compliance with long-term goals. 3. The project has possible effects which are Individually 11.Ued but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, .cumulatively considerable. .ans that the fncremental effects of an fndividual project are considerable when viewed. In connection. with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. The proposed amendment and zone changes will not result In any significant adverse environmental effects which are cumulative or growth-inducing In nature. 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either dtrec~ly or fndtrectly~ There is no substantial ,evidence that the project will have adverse effects on human betngs either directly or Indirectly. No public health fmpacts were fdentified In the J~itial Study. H. Consultatipp 1. 2. 1. Individuals and Oraanizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken larsen, Director of Building and Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Captain Kefth Hawkins, Police Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Departlltent Dtana lil~y, Planning . . . .' ( ; '. ) -6- Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: City Planning DepartMent/Lettieri-McIntyre 533 F Street, Suite 209 ' San Di.ego, CA 92101 . 2. .Documents : Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Seneral Plan, City of Chula Vista 3. Jn1t1_J Studv . . This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any tOllll1ents received on the Initial Study and any tonrnents received during the publtc review period for the Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning . Department,~ Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA '2010. ENR;L~ ~ 'OORDINATOR EN 6 (~~';:/'O) VPC 9365P . . .' I I t J I , . I ____.1 , , I I I I I . , L I . I I I I . ~~~~~~:~~:~:~~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:~:: ~~:~:~~ ~t~*~~:,~:,~:,~;~~~m~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~.....-. . ...... . . . . . . . 'II. . . :::3:::::::::::::::::::::::~:1 ".:~::: ~: ::::: :::~:::::~~~:::::::::::::: :::::::::::: . ......................:....... ..... . . .:.............t.......~..... ".:.:.:.' ,I ...J'..................(...:.,.:..... .... .:':":':':':':':':':':'.':'.' ",. .:.:.: : I : : : : : : . . . · · · · · . .'. ... . . . . .."...,\....'x.::.". '.':""::;<.1. .,,'.:{':.: . 1 . II ( I , I . ..1 L___ I . . . I I ___ L . I I . , I I . I 1 j ) I . . . I I . I I . . . . . . ~ . . .I~I [ .,,: ~mYJ,~ ..... DINIIT'I M~ t;;;;;1 TIUIOUGff'ARE C011J1IRaAL. mID MTAL CCf 11 ERaAl c:::J ......RCH AND LMTED NIUIlJIAL 1;")'-1 MRICI AND OPEN INClE . IAN dTAY MARKET GPA-91-3 CHANGE FROM "RESEARCH & LIMITED INDUSTRIAL" TO -MERCANTILE. & OFFICE COMMERCIAL II .. ....-........... ... ~... N EXHIBIT A , " . . .- .., . . . ) . INITIAL STUDY 'City of Chula Yilta' Application Fonm FOR OFFICE USE ~::e No / ~~-E. ~:r Receipt ~o. #~ Olte Rec'd /_ ~r-,...... Accepted by ~ J1V. Project No. ~A- ~/.? . A. BACKGROUND 1. PROOECT TITLE Otay Market 'CPA. SPA , RelEone 2. PROOECT LOCATION (Street address or description) 1716 Broadway, bounded by Main Street, Faivre Street, 27th Street & Broadway Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. 629-040-01 and 629-010-01 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION Amendment of the land uae diagram of the City General Plan from ''Research and Limited Manufacturing" to "lletail . Commercial", amendment of tbe land use designation of the (See Attached Sheet) 4. Name of Applicant City of Chula Vista Address 276 Fourth Avenue Phone 691-S101 City Chnh Villif-. State CA Zip 92010 5. Name of Preparer/Agent City Plannina DepartmentlLettier1-McIntvre , Assoeiatel Address S33 F Street, Suite 209 Phone 238-4241 City San Diein State CA .Zip 92101 Rel~tio~ to Applicant Consultant 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or ~ocuments . required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Penmfts or approvals required: ,! .Jl- General Plan Revision ..L Re zon f ng/f.P'e!eftWtt Precise Plan ---- Specific Plan - Cond. Use PeMmit - Variance ---- Design Review Committee Public Project - Tentathe Subd. Map ---- Annexation - Grading Permit ---- Design Review Board- - Tentative Parcel Map ---- Redevelopment Agency - Site Plan & Arch. Review---- T Oth,r Specific Plan Amendment - Enclosures or documents (as required by the Envfroraental Review Coordinator). b. ..L. Location Map Arch. Elevations Gradi ng Pl an - Landscape Plans . ---- Site Pl an - Photos of Site & ---- Parcel Map - Setti ng ---- Preti se Pl an Tentative Subd. Map ---- Specific Plan - IlIprovement Plans ---- Other Agency Penni t or - Soi 1 s Report ---- Approvals Required - . . . Eng. Geology Report - tfydrological Study ---- Biological Study . ---- Archaeological Survey ---- Noise Assessment ---- Traffic I.pact Report ---- Other ---- ~ .- .. ., .. . . ",,;"--. , . , , oj ) A. 3~ of Initial Study continued: Montlomery Specific Plan from "ae.earch and L1IIlited Industrial" to "Mercantile and Office Commercial". and rezoning from the County'. "C37': aone to the City'. "CCP" aone. . ; . . -- t' . ) .. - 2 - 8. PROPOSED PRC1lECT 1. Land Area: sq. footage - or acreage 1.86 If llnd lrea to be dedicated, state Icreage Ind purpOse. . N/A ,2. ~mplete this section if project is residential. I. Type cltvelopment: Single family Two family". Mul tt family Townhouse Condom n1 um b. Number of structures Ind heights " ." . .' 2 bedrooms Total units 3. c. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms d. Gross dens.ity (DU/tota1.. acres) e. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) f. Es~1mated project populati~n , g. Estimated sale or rental prfce range h. Square foof~ge of floor area(s) .,/ i. Percent'of lot cov~rage by buildings or struc~res j. Number of on-sfte parking spaces to be provtd:d k. ~Percent of sfte in road and paved surface'~ " / Complete this section if project 1s commercial or industrial. I. Type(s) of land use b. Floor area ..He'fght of structure(s) c. . Type of construction used '~fn the structure / ' " ,," /' d. , Describe ..jar Ic~e$s points to the struct:ure~ and the orientation to adjoinfng properties and streets .' " ." e. Number of on:'sfte parking spaces provided ".' f. Estimated number of employees per shtft . llIDber of shifts Total g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estilllte _ ;. i, \... ) . ~ 3 - h. Estiaated range of service area and basis of estimate 1. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings Ic. ,Hours ,of o~ration Type of e.(terfor lighting j. ,_. 4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project' General Plan , Specific Plan Amendment; ltezone b. Type of facilities provided existing :1~I~eiales ; future c. Square feet of enclosed structures development proposals d. Hei ght of structure ( s) - IDIxinnn 8ubject to precise plan approval e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfac.s t. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) fdentify them. N/A 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the proPerty anticipated no (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how ~ny cubic yard,S of earth will be excavated? -0- . b. How IIIIny cuMc yards of f111 will be placed? -0- " c. Mow IlUch area (sq. ft. or acres) win be graded? -0-. d. What w11l be the - Maximum depth of cut N/A Average depth of cut ll/A Naxilllll depth of fnl 'N/A Average depth of fill 'N/A , .. 4. ( , '-- ) '. :"4- , 3. Describe III energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (Iir conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) NJA 5. Indicate the amount of na+.ura' open space that fs part of the project (sq. ft. or. acrel) - . RIA' If the project ",nl result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these .fobs. Potential opportunity when ~aTcels develon with eXDanded commercial uses. . 6. , Will high'y flammatle or potentially explosive'~ter1als or substances be used or stored ~thfn the project site? RIA How many fstimated automobile trips, per day, will be aenerated by the project? Commercial land usesauch as. grocery sfore generate 150 estimated daily veh1cle tr1ps per 1,000 sq. It. Describe (1f any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of Iccess or connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. RIA. Develop~ent of the parcels will be subject to precise plan review. 7. 8. O. 'OESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAl SETTING 1. Geology Previous environmental docu- ments include IS-88-4M and Has a geology study been conducted on the property? IS-88-56M (If yes, please attach) . Has a So11 s Report on the project site been ..de? (If yes, please attach). . . 2. Hydrology Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the . site? (If yes, please explain in detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? No. b. Are there any watercourses or drainage fapr'Ovements on or adjacent to the site? No. . - .0, , . . ( . ~ - ) - 5 - t. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? No. d. Could drainage from the site ,ause erosion Dr siltation to adjacent areas? No. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided Ind their location. Won~ ~roposed for \his ~r01ect. . e. 3. Noise I. Will there be Iny nofse generated from the proposed project sfte or from points of access which may fmpact the surrounding or adjacent land ~ses? Fo. I 4. Biology a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? No. b. Indicate type, size and quantity of trees on the sfte Ind which (1f any) will be removed by the project. N/A 5. Past Use of the Land a. Are there any known historical resources located on or ftelr the project sfte? None identified. b. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project sfte? Non>> identified. I. Current Land Use a. Describe 111 .structures Ind land uses currently existing on the project site. The extreme eorner of the parcel i. utilized a. a e~r lot. Otav ~rket i. . .Ingle story, approx1mate~y ti.~uu sq. ft. buIldIn2 located on the remainder of th~ .51 .~. ~Ar~~l. Annroximately 56 ~arking space. are aarked on site and a flower .tapd 18 located on the lot a. well. the 1.35 acre to tbe .outh i. vacant,' with a portion used for storage. .. . . ~- . ) . . , - 6 - b. Describe 111 structures Ind land uses currently existing on adj Icent J)roper~y. . . North ''Main Center" - a cOIIIIDerical strip center witb abed commercial and office uses South Vacant I)arcel East : Thrift store. brakes' a:'.ignment basiness. aervice/gas atation West Office buildinR. lIlotel. auto 'Darts. lIletal works 7. Sochl , I. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how IIIn1?) No. . b. Are there any current em~loyment cpportunftfes on sfte? (If SO, ho,., many and what type?) existing market . Please rovfde an other information which could ex edite the evaluation of e propose proJec. The subject parcels were part of the Barborside B Park Ii area of tbe Montgomery Rezoning Program (PCZ-90-Q-M). At the November 13, 1990 public bearing, Council directed staff to prepare reports on tbe resolution of zoning and land use concerns raised by tbe property owner, Mr. Paul Tamayo. Mr. Tomayo stated tbe Otay Market, located on tbe nortbern parcel, bas been in operation for approximately 20 years. The owner'. intent i8 to demolisb the existing market and rebuild a larger one on tbe adjacent .outhern parcel, using tbe northern parcel for parking. Since the parcels are witbin a Special Study Area of tbe MOntgomery Specific Plan, commercial zoning will require a General Plan and Specific Plan Amend- 1Dent. The surrounding land uses include a s1xture of commercial, office and industrial development. Commercial zoning witb a precise plan requirement could.accomodate a market expansion in proper relation to tbe existing .aried land uses. - - . ( . ) J . '-- . t - 7 - e. E. CERTIFICATION It or OWner/owner 1n escrow* I. /V}(i),tt,(Vzatj: . )%ary E. Hay ettieri- ntyre' Asscm1ates Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my bel ief, the statements and infonnation herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known infonmation concerning the project and its setting have been included in 'arts 8, C and D of this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. . DATE: January 22. 1991 *If acting for I corporation, fncl~de capacity and compa~ name. - . ICWID OF 1DUCA1IDH .I:lSEPH D. ClMIINGS. PILD. LARRY CUNNINGHAM atARON GLES PATRICK A. JUDD GREG R. SANDOVAL ~trrEJaNT ~ F. WGRlN. Pb.D. l'~ r~ ) CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRIcT 84 EAST "'J" STREET · CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92010 . 6 9425.9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH February 2~, 1991 Ms. Maryann Miller Environmental Review Dept. City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: otay Market General Plan Aaenaent Applicant: City of Chula Vista Location: 1716 Broadway Case No: %S-91-33 Dear Ms. Miller: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the Initial Study for the otay Market General Plan Amendment and rezoning. In the past, in response to notifications of various proposed legislative actions by the City, the District expressed concern that, absent specific development proposals, such City-initiated actions effectively preclude our ability to adequately mitigate impacts on schools. Given the extreme overcrowding that exists' in schools serving the subject area, and the fact that developer fees allowed under state law supply approximately one-fourth of new facility costs, the District Dust look to all available alternative financing mechanisms.' In this case the City is converting County land use designations and zoning to City classifications, from Research and Limited Manufacturing/Industrial to Retail/Mercantile/Office Commercial. Based on District data, commercial development produces Dore employees than industrial, and thus, more children. As stated pr_viously, since no specific development proposal is associated with these legislative actions, 'the District is not able to quantify and a~sess aitigation at this tiDe. When development is proposed for these properties, and we will be able to quantify impacts,.. will be limited to collection of developer fees since, wi th the amendm.ent/rezoning in place, no legislative action will be required of the City. ~he issue bere is 'the District's ability to adequately . mitigate impacts on elementary facilities, not whether or not the proposed action, represents an intensification of current use, or even a change in permitted use under county . ( ... ) Ms. Maryann Miller February 25, 1991 Page 2 0: 7S-91-33/Dtay Market General Plan AaendJIent . or City designations. ~he City is not similarly limited to collecting mitigation fees for only those projects involving legislative actions. ~e City can assess/require wdtigation at any tiDe during the discretionary review process through imposition of fees such as the DIF. ~e District does not have this ability, being restricted by State law to developer fees except in cases involving legislative actions. Our only opportunit~ to, adequately mitigate impacts 1s at the time a legislative action 1s taken. We have communicated these concerns to the City on numerous occasions. At the City'S request, on November 1, 1990, I provided a suggestion as to how mitigation of impacts on schools from future projects located in areas currently proposed for rezoning/amendment by the City could be 'addressed. A copy of that letter, and a follow-up dated December 7, 1990, are attached. I appreciate the opportunity to comment. I am hopeful that the City and District can work together to assure consistency with the Growth Management ~eshold for Schools. Sincerely, ~~~~ . Kate Shurson Director of Planning J(S : dp . cc: John Linn '1'om Silva George Itrempl . - . I CHuLA VISTA CITY SCHOJL DISTRIC'l' ... EAST -J- ~ET · CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA .2010 · 819..25-9600 EACH CIIILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL or GREAT WORn. IOAIIJ DPIDUC:A 110M aEllH D. c:u.t.RS. fIIl.D. Novembe r 1. 1990 -.wlON GUS PATRICK A..lICO #JV.CHlUNlEfIO fMHKA.1AlWfTtfO __I&aNT a. F....... "-D. .. Mr. Frank Herrera Assistant ~lanner City of.Chula Ylsta 276 Fourth Avenue Chula YIsta. CA 92010 IE: City-Inltfated Rezoning Actions - "Itlgatlon for I.pacts on Schools Dear Mr. Herrera: In response to your request at our recent .neettng, thfs letter (1) presents a suggestton as to how ..ittgation of tmpacts on schools assoctated wt th future projects located in areas currently proposed for rezoning by the CI ty could be addressed; Ind (2) provides I constructive, nonadverslal process to assure provlston of school facilities. . As stated in previous correspondence, the District has grave concerns over the Clty's rezoning Icttvltles Ind fmpacts on our Ibl1lty to provtde Idequate school facnlttes. In rezonfng any property Ibsent I specfflc development proposal, the City effecthely precludes the Distrtct' s Ibt 1fty to fully ..ltlgate fmpacts of future development, sfnce once a property fs rezoned, approval of any future project would not requtre I legislattve Ict by the City. I suggested that the City .dopt I poltcy reqUiring future development wtthln these rezoned ~reas to fully comply with recommended school Mftlgatton whtch. could fnclude. but fsnot limited to. partictpatton in or annexatton to I Mello-Roos CFO. payment of. fu11costs to ..fttgate f~acts. or other .ltematt,e financing ~chanfsm. One llethod to acMeve this would be to utflfze the City's existfng Modifying Districts (Chapter 19.56) 'and add. new category for those arels whtch are currently being considered for rezontng by the ctty. This category could requIre that whene,er the ~dlfytng district fs shown on the zoning lnap. .ny proposed project whIch would permit greater development intensity than that WhIch currently exists (phYSically) ..ust comply wIth recOmmended school Dtstrlct .tttgatton. TMs would be" consfstent with the .thod currently utt1tzed when . rezoning"request fs received for. specifiC project. The Ippltcant is required by the City to fully comply with Dtstrlct recommendations. - ~ . . . : . ... ""-',,, ( i '- "- ) Wovember I. 1990 Mr. Frank Herrera RE: City-Initiated Rezoning Actions - Mltlgatlon.for Impacts on Schools . . 'Ige 2 The requirements ,laced on projects located wUhln areas where the Cfty has fnlUated the rezoning should be 110 different. than the requirements placed on projects where I rezoning ts requested by the developer. The fmpacts to the District are the same. This action ~uld Ilso assure that elementary facllftles will be provided concurrent with need, consistent with the Cfty's Threshold for Schools. ." I ~uld be happy to discuss this further. Please let lie know If you have Iny questions. Slncere-ly, ~-t- 9h~ tate Shurson Director of Planning kS : dp .. cc: George krempl John linn Dan ffentschke . . - . .t ' eDMDClFlllUCAlIDII .aEPH D. CUU<<JS. fILl). IHMON GLES PA1Ra A..lIDO . lS>y 8CtU.ENBEAO fMHKA.1ARAH1JfO ~ DIf F. WIWf. PILD. CHULA ('MA ELEMENTARY Sc"nboL DlS'lRICT 84 EAST -T STREET · CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 12010 · 819..1600 BACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL or GREAT WORTH December 7. 1990 Mr. ken lee Principal Planner City of Chula Vista 276 fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 IE: tity-Intttated Rezontng Acttons - Mittgatton for I.,acts on Schools Dear ken: Pursuant to your request at our .eeting in lat~ October, on November I, 1990. I submitted I proposal IS to how the City could address the issue of assuring mitigation for school impacts from projects located in City-initiated rezoned Ireas. A copy of that letter is enclosed. J have not received I response to .y correspondence. Sinct the City continues to process rezonings for various central Ind southern Ireas of the City, Ind since District facilities in these areas are overtaxed. we Ire extremely interested in working with the City ~o . implement I process whereby f.pacts from future projects located within these rezoned Ireas can be Idequatelymitigated. The affects on the District from projects located within areas rezoned by the City Ibsent I development proposal can be clearly demonstrated by the proposed Rohr Office expansion fn the Midbayfront Redevelopment area. The addition of 211.500 square feet of office space will significantly impact student enrollment. The District has consistently responded-to 111 City notices Ind documents on this project by stating that fees Ire inadequate Ind reconnending an Ilternative .echanhm. The developer has expressed unwillingness to provide the necessary .itfgatfon.. Had Rohr been required to apply for a rezone. fnstead of the City approving the rezoning prior to project submittal, the Mirl Decision would have allowed the Cfty to require full mitigatfon of impacts on schools. . I *Duld apprecilte discussing this fssue further at your convenience. Sincerely, ~~ . - Kate Shurson Dfrector of Planning KS:dp cc: dohn linn Dan Hentschke ~ . . ( - . --) . . Sweetwater Union High School ADMINSrRATION CENTlER 11ao P1n'H AVENUE CHUU. VISTA. -CALFORNIA .&01' "1') ..1.1111 ~s OCPAJnlotD.,. February 11, 1991 .s. Maryann C. Miller City of Chula Vista, Plannin9 Department 276 4th Avenue BEa Otay Market G.P.A. 15-91-33 Dear Ms. Millera I am in receipt of the above subject initial study and find that there is insufficient information provided in the notice.~o make a reasonable assessment of the proposed project's impact to secondary schools, I will need to know the scope of improvement. as soon as the applicant provides you with these details, please forward them to this office. ~hank you.for includin9 the district in the review process. Sincerely, 'l'bomas Silva Director of Plannin9 eCI Xate Shurson '1'8 I AM ~ . .. . , l) '.~) Sweetwater Union High School District flL.ANNIHG DEPARTMENT Apr11 23, 1991 ADMtN.,...ATION CENTEtt "SO "'"H AVENUE CHULA v.TA. CALPOItNtA Non .11) .11.111S Ms. Maryanne Miller City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue . Chula Vista. CA 91911 Dear Ms. Miller: Re: IS-91-33 - 1716 Broadway - - RECEIVED ::,;1 2 6 1991 PLANNING . I . f The above project will have an impact.on the Sweetwater Union High School District. Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to Government Code No. 65995 (Developer Fees) prior to issuance of building permit. c~ Thomas Silva Director of Planning TS/sf cc: .Kate Shurson , ~ -- EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF JULY 24, 1991 U' r.....!"\. T".'-" - ~- -. - .'-' ~ "'. ~ ~ -, " , , . . . . . ... ~ '.-.' --' ...... ....... .----~ --- r. ,r"'~ l""~, r'I n r:--~~ " : ::1,')., ,_ __ _ ~ .... '....,.j ;..,. L.:JJ;,;;.,.I "....-.. ITEM 4a: PUBLIC HEARING: GPA-90-01: PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE CITY GENERAL PLAN BY THE REDESIG- NATION OF APPROXIMATELY 3.65 ACRES OF. LAND, LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF EAST · H' STREET AND OTAY LAKES ROAD, FROM -LCM-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (3-6 DUlAC). AND -SPECIAL STUDY. TO -RETAIL COMMERCIAL - - KELTON TITLE CORPORATION (continued f ran July 10, 1991) ITEM 4b: PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-90-B: CONSIDERATION TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 3.65 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOOTHEAST CORNER OF EAST -H- STREET AND OTAY LAKES ROAD FROM .R- 1- TO .C-C-P. - KELTON TITLE CORPORATION - Associate Planner Batchelder noted that the purpose of the appl ica tion was to establ ish a General Plan and land use designation for this site which would allow the construction of a retail convenience center. The proposal was before the Commission and the City Council initialiy in the later part of 1986 and 1987. The Council returned tbe proposal to the Commission with a request for recommendations. The appl icant withdrew the item before the Commission bearing. This proposal is basically the same as tbat considered previously. Mr. Batchelder indicated tbat tbe site 1s contained with1n one of the seven Community Activity Centers listed in the General Plan. The Council also placed a -SpeCial study. overlay designation on this site that requires Planning staf~ to evaluate a variety of alternate land uses for this location as part of any request to amend the General Plan. The staft report evaluates not only the applicant's proposal but tbat of the existing land use and two alternative uses. He then reviewed tbe staft report and the pros and cons for the existing .Low Medimn Density Residential (3-6 du/ac. and -R-l- zoning, the proposed -Retail Commercial- and Plannina Commission 3 July 24. 19~1 .C-C-p., .Professional and Administrative Commercial. and .C-o-p. and, lastly, -Medium-High Density Residential (11-18 du/ac).. Staff's finding is to de~ the applicant's request for .Retail Commercial-/-C-C-p. in favor of .Professional and Administrative Commercial-/.C-o-p. as offering the best varlety of potential uses consistent with the General Plan's intent for the Community Activity Centers. The zoning recommendation also requires the application Of Precise Plan Modifiers. There is no need for further retail commercial development in the southeastern area or in the entire Eastern Territory. The addition of 4+ acres of retail commercial to the existing 16+ acres of commercial centers nearby would lead toward land use imbalance and create somethlng of a .strip commercial setting- adjacent to two busy intersections. Planner Batchelder displayed a diagram indicating the Ipcation of retail commercial centers along Telegraph Ca~on Road, East -H. Street, Otay Lakes Road and in the EastLake developments showing the total number to be well in excess of the standards of the Urban Land Institute. Staff is ot the opinion that the site is well suited for affordable housing in the Eastern Territory because of its proximity to public transportation and availability of supplemental services, such as medical or other shops. A Medium- High density housing project would meet a varlety of needs in the area. The Professional and Administrative Commercial designation would recognize the setting in terms of traftic and permlt the greatest flexibility and balanced land use aspect for the wouthwestern College Activity Center. The location would be ideal for a quasi-public type use because of its geographical location. For these and other reasons, staft recommends that the appli- cant's request be denied and the Commission approve the designation ot Professional and Administrative Commercial with the zoning of C-o-P. In reply to Commissioner Tugenberg, City Traffic Engineer Rosenberg said that the consultant had recommended that the intersection be modified to provide dual left-turn lanes. More information is needed by staff regarding necessary improvements required by build-out of the Eastern Territories. Widening of Otay Lakes Road and East .H. Street sufficient for a six-lane road will be required, however, the dual turn lanes are considered to be a City or communi ty need not generated by the project but by cumulative growth. In reply to Commissioner Casillas, he stated that the formula, 1 acre/l,aaa, took into consideration both regional and local traffic. Plannin9 Commission 4 Jul Y 24. 1991 Mark Kelton, Kelton Title Corp., 5109 .Waring Road, San Diego, asked for clarification of tbe mitigation measures required. Associate Planner Reid outlined tbem and pointed out that it the Commission approved a commercial designation, mitigation would not be required until sucb time as a specific project was proposed. Mr. Kelton asked permission to return to tbe podium after Mr. Bedenkamp and Mr. Vance bad spoken. Bill Bedenkamp, Bedenkamp and Associates, 1331 India wtreet, San Diego 92101, said tbe site plan allows for 35,000 square feet of what could be retail and office uses. TO go to a purely oft ice- type project, there would be approximately 70,000 square feet of office space which far surpasses tbe need of tbe area. Tbis would generate considerably more traffic at peak times. Beneficial uses such as mail service, sboe repair and beauty shops are permitted uses in tbe C-C zone but are conditional uses in the c-o. ,I Lee Vance, P&D Technologies, 401 West A., San Diego, addressed staff's six objections to tbe project and pointed out that the proposed project was very small and would increase the overall retail commercial in Chula Vista by .3% and in the Eastern Territories by only 1.5%. Mr. Kelton returned to the podium and spoke to tbe size of the parcel as compared with Bonita Point Center. Be noted tbat traffic fees of $438,000 were required regardless of zoning and that the C-C-P would permit a more viable project. Inquiries have already been received from businesses such as the Red LObster, San Diego Trust, and a children's store. No one else wishing to speak, the public bearing was closed. MSUC (Tugenberg!Decker) 6-0, to adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-90-l3 and Monitoring Program prepared thereunder. MSUC (Tugenberg!Decker) 6-0, to approve the applicant's request for a General Plan Amendment to -Retail Commercial- and rezoning to -C-C-P- . I , APPENDIX 1 \ ',) OT A Y LAKES AND "H" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN INTRODUCTION . A General Plan Amendment should embody the intent of the General Plan and should be consistent with the established goals and objectives outlined. For the purpose of ensuring that the proposed land use of the Otay Lakes and "H" Street property is In confonnance with the Otuera1 Plan. each goal or statement enumerated in the General Plan was assessed for its relationship and relevance to the proposed project. Each loal and associated discussion is listed in the .following section. GENERAL PLAN OOALSIST ATEMENTS 1.1 LAND USE ELEMENT, Page 1-37 Commun!tv Activitv Centers Community Activity Centers are subcenters. of the general plan area that provide a variety of community support facilities and services. They are not exclusively community retail centers and may include employment, education, health care, recreation and other public and private services. One 0/ the six Community Activity Centers: · Southwestern College. The area in the vicinity of the intersection of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road. 1.2 . LAND USE ELEMENT, Page 1-48 Rice Canvon ( Rice Canyon is the parle, open space and pedes- trianlbicyc1e utilization of both the north and lOuth branches of Rice Canyon COMecting the Terra Nova Onnmunity Activity Center near I- t 805 and East H Street through residential neigh- boJboods to the Southwestern College Communi- ty Activity Center in and around the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and East H Street This includes Southwestern Conege. neighboJbood retail center, medium density housing and high school. ~ DISCUSSION The proposed land use of the site as commercial is consistent with the Community Activity Center - Southwestern College. This activity center currently includes a range of land uses including retail employment. health care. and recreation. A residential land use is not listed as one of the typical land uses in a Q)mmunity Activity Center. The site forms the destination neighboJbood retail center for the Rice Canyon pedestrian/- bicycle trail. thereby allowing safe alternative transportation from residential to commercial centers. -1- ~ uJ ~ ~ ~ 5 < ",> ,..- -z ;::J tlJ~ ii:~ 8 c z < s:J 8 z < ~ ::J (- Land Use Element .\\ \ \ '\ -' 1...36 . \- - ) OTAY LAKES AND "H" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN (Continued) GENERAL PLAN GOALS/STA TEMENTS DISCUSSION 1.3 LAND USE ELEMENT, Pale 1-61,62 East H Street from I-80S to Hunte Parkwav 'The adjacent land uses encompass a broad range of commercial. varying density residential. employment and educational facUities. The views from the scenic roadway to these varied 1a.nd uses is an important asset to the scenic route. It is also an important consideration to maintain, consistent quality of development and landscaping along the entire route. Otav Lakes Road The views of these facilities and the treatment of the roadway itself should be consistent with maintaining the current scenic quality and maxi- _ mizing the future scenic highway potential of this route. 1.4 LAND USE, Page 1-64, All developments proposed adjacent to scenic routes should be subject to. design review to Insure that the design of the development propos- al wiD enhance the scenic quality of the high- way. 1bis review should include: 1. Architectural design of stJUctures 2. Siting of stJUctures 3. Height of structures 4. Landscaping 5. Signs 6. Utilities ( The site is on a prominent comer and as a well designed commercial center will form a land- mark consistent with the vision 01 the C>>mmuni- ty Center. Landscaping wiD be consistent with the Oty requirements for scenic highwa>,s. The project will continue to be subject to this review process at the subsequent site plan sub- mittal. -2- (- I, OTAY LAKES AND "H" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN (Continued) OENERAL PLAN GOALS/STA TEMENTS DISCUSSION 1.5 CIRCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-3 The purpose of this circulation element is to create a safe and efficient circulation system which wiD maintain the movement of people and loods, both locally and regionally: 1.6 C1RCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-' Obiective 4. Minimize the adverse effects of traffic volumes. speed. noise and safety impacts , by designing a circulation system that prevents non-local through traffic from penetrating resi- dential neighborhoods. 1.7 CIRCULATION ELEMENT, Page 2-13 Obiective 27. Promote the development of well plarmed communities which will tend to be self supportive and thus reduce the length of the vehicular trip, reduce the dependency on the automobile and encourage the use of other modes of travel. Obiective 28. Develop patterns of land use which will allow the elimination of certain trips and the reduction of overall trip lengths. particu- larly the home to work trip. 1.8 CIRCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-14 Bicvcle Plan Obiective 1. Link major residential areas with principal trip destinations such as schools. parks. community centers and shopping centers. ( The proposed land use is an efficient use of the existing circulation systeril due to its proximity to residential neighborhoods. ' The change in the land use designation from residential to commercial will meet this objec- tive. The current zoning places a residential land use adjacent to two major arterial roads. The proposed commercial land use will provide a complementary use to the existing retail. and residential neighborhoods thus reducing total vehicle miles travelled (VMT). The site Is on two existing bike routes and pro- vides the proposed linkage. -3- '. I \- ( .J OTAY LAKES AND "8" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN (Continued) . GENERAL PLAN GOALSISTA TEMENTS DISCUSSION . . 1.9 CIRCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-25, . 2-18 1be pneral plan Includes the following routes classified as six-Jane prime anerials: · East H Street from Interstate 80s to Otay Lakes Road. · Otay Lakes Road from Bonita Road south to Orange A venue in Eastern Tenitories. Roadwav Caoacitv Standards ( Approx. LOS C ADT Facility Tvoe f of Lanes Six-Lane Prime 6 Anerial 50,000 1.10 CIRCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-41 The proposed public transit system includes a network of local bus routes oriented to each of the community activity centers...Community activity centers serviced by the local bus network . Include Southwestern College. -. 1.11 C1RCULA nON ELEMENT, Page 2-41 The Open Space and Trall Network will be designed to provide direct access to the major stops of the local bus network....1hus integrating the non-vehicular mode of tranSpOrtation system , such as pedestrians and bicyclists, with the mass transit and vehicular modes of transpOrtation. ( The site is fronted by two six-lane pime anerials which by defmidon have a projected ADT of 50,000. The proposed commercial land use is compatible with these very busy streets. A residendalland use is. not compatible. The site is served by two existing local bus routes and users are provided with alternative modes of transportation from theirbomes to this proposed commercial site. A pedestrian connection between the existing JeSidential -neighborhood and the proposed commercial site will provide a non-vehicular connection (along with the existing bike routes). -4- t_ ( ~) OTAY LAKES AND "8" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN (Continued) GENERAL PLAN GOALSISTA TEMENTS DISCUSSION U2 HOUSING ELEMENT, Page 4-3 Housinr Policv The mixture of residential neighborhoods with Incompatible industrial or commercial uses shall be prevented. 1bis miXbJre tends to result in residential decline and blight and the consequen- ti~ reduction of the quality of life. and the value of real property (pg. 4-3). 1.13 SAFETY ELEMENT, Page 8-0 Hazard Mana2ement The man-created hazards are fire hazards. noise hazards and air quality degradation. 1.14 INTRODUCTION, Page v State Reauirements and Policies To m~tain. improve. and enhance the quality or air. water. and land according to state and na- tional standards and local needs. "(Adapted from Public Resources Code Section 21000 et sea,). ( 'The site Is not contiguous to any existing or proposed residential neighborhoods and is sepa- rated from these neighboJboods by both a church site and a streeL The Oty of Chula Vista requires an A.Q.J.P. (Air Quality Improvement Plan) for most pro- jects. This proposed land use will reduce vehicle trips by locating a retail land use within a rea- sonable proximity to residential neighborhoods as well as along existing bus routes. bike trails and pedestrian trails. This project will introduce more retall in proxim- ity to existing and future' residential neighbor- hoods. thereby reducing the distance and fre- quency of trips. A reduction in V.M.T. (Vehicle Miles 1!aveUed) improves air quality. -5- .. ( . ) OTAY LAKES AND "H" STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER RELATIONSHIP TO GENERAL PLAN (Continued) . GENERAL PLAN GOALSISTATEMENTS DISCUSSION LIS INTRODUCTION, Pale 0-3 The Vision ( 1be new residential communities In the eastern . area will set back from new major "arterial roads. thus reducing the noise and safety impact. 1.16 NOISE ELEMENT, Page '.7 Noise Policv To develop a City noise program which recog- nizes the right of every citizen to live in an environment in which noise is not detrimental to his or her life. health. and enjoyment of property. 1.17 NOISE ELEMENT, Page '-8 ImoJementation Plan Consider the effects of noise. especially transpor- tation in its land use decisions to ensure noise compatibility. ( Based on current standards Ibe setback expected to be required for residential land use It this location would reduce the usable site area to only approximately 1.8 acres. 1bis small a site is not feasible to develop with medium to medi- um high density residential. The proposed commercial development would not be subject to the noise setbacks in this goal. The proposed commercial land use is compatible with the noise levels on the site. Neither the existing residential zoning nor a higher density residentlalland use is compatible with the trans. ponatlon noise It this intersection of two major roads. -6- . ~ . c.! . ) ( OTAY LAKES AND EAST "H"STREET COMMERCIAL CENTER MAJOR ISSUES SUMMARY . )And Use - The site is J!2! contiguous to any residential land use nor is it across from any JeSidentialland use. It is adjacent to an institutional use and across the street from retail use and public institutions. . · ~erional Needs - The site is designated as a Community Activity Center in the General Plan which is intended to inclu~e a mixture of ~tai1. employment and communitY serving uses. · Visibility - The site is a very prominent intersection. A commercial development can be designed to produce a high quality appearance using both architecture and landscaping. By comparison, a residential development would likely requi~ a major soundwall which would . put a blank face to the street. · Noise - The site is severely impacted by the noise generated by the intersection of two prime anerial roads - Otay Lakes Road and East IOH" Street. According to a preliminary noise study by P&D, to meet the Chula Vista requirements for noise levels in a residential zone, aU residential development would have to be setback 150 feet from the centerline of the adjacent roads. This would reduce the usable land area to below that reasonable for residential development. . Air Oualitv - Introducing complementary retail uses to this designated Community Activity Center will allow neighboring residents to shop closer to home. This reduction in V.M.T. (Vehicle Miles Travelled) will improve the air quaJity. Also. the location of the site at the hub of bus routes, bike routes, and pedestrian trails will allow for use of alternative modes . of transportation. ( -7- APPENDIX 1 2 SPECIAL STUDY ANALYSIS In response to the Ci ty Council's establ i shment of a "Special Study Area" overlay on the subject property, the following analysis provides a comparative assessment of pertinent issues with regard to the existing land use designation, the applicant's proposal, and several alternative land uses which are appropriate for consideration on this property. EXISTING .lOW-MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (3-6 du'ac).'.R-l. PROS: 1. Deve 1 opment woul d be homogeneous wi th the exi st i ng s i ng1 e family nature of the College Estates area. 2. Would provide for housing development adjacent to schools, services, and transportation. CONS: 1. The site's location on the corner of a busy intersection and its shape, topography, and size would negatively impact and detract from a single family dwelling environment. 2. Single family development would not be consistent with objectives of the General Plan to place higher density housing within Community Activity Centers. PROPOSED .RETAIl COMMERCIAl.'"C-C-P" PROS: 1. Retail commercial development is consistent with General Plan prescribed uses for Community Activity Centers. 2. The site's location at the corner of East H Street and Otay lakes Road makes it amenable for a retail use as it is convenient to vehicular traffic. 3. The site is served by existing bus routes and designated bicycle and pedestrian systems, thereby meeting General Plan objectives to encourage use of alternate transportation. 4. Physical and topographical separation of the site from the adjacent church and residential uses, and its orientation away from those uses to the intersection minimize potential negative impacts and land use incompatibility. 5. Deve 1 opment woul d be cons i stent wi th General Pl an goals to improve and increase the retail base of the City. WPC 9653P -1- ".;.-..., <...~.> CONS: 1. The eastern territories will be adequately served by retail commercial areas already designated in the. General Plan. In recognition of the substantial land use changes in the area, staff conducted an analysis of exi st i ng and planned retails i tes and res i dent ia 1 popul at ions ut il i zi ng commercial land allocation and siting criteria established by the Urban Land Institute and other noted planning authorities. Applying their minimum 1 ac/l000 population ratio and 1 to 1.5 mile service radii for neighborhood retail uses, residents are adequately served by well planned and located retail centers (please see Exhibit D). 2. The City's General Plan ensures that Eastern Territories master planned developments will provide well sited and convenient retail commercial services commensurate to future residential growth. This includes the 35 acre retail component of the EastLake I Vi 11 age Center, 19 acres in EastLake Greens, 15 acres in EastLake Trails, 10 acres in EastLake III, 11 acres in Sun bow , and 16 acres proposed in Rancho San Hi gue 1 (p 1 ease see Exhibit D). While it may serve a short-term need prior to development of those retail commercial facilities, this proposal is not necessary to serve the ultimate needs of future residents. 3. As illustrated by Exhibit 0, several existing and proposed retail centers are already strategically located on principal travel routes, and will offer a more comprehensive range of goods and services. 4. While commercial uses are a prescribed component of Community Activity Centers, approximately 16 acres of retail use (Bonita Point Plaza and College Plaza) already exist within the Southwestern College Activity Center. Both of these centers are equally well located to alternate transportation facilities and pedestrian/open space linkages. 5. Given the location of the two existing retail centers, establishment of a third would lend to formation of a "strip" setting on Otay Lakes Road. Traffic patterns associated to such a setting, most notably well used entrances and exi ts to the center located in close proximi ty to the intersection of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road, would only tend to further worsen traffic flow at a notably taxed intersection. 6. While it is true the site is highly visible and at a busy intersection of two designated scenic roadways, the General Plan dictates that any use at that site will be visually sensitive. Achievement of appropriate scenic quality is not unique to the applicant's proposal. Site design is not under consideration, and is essentially irrelevant to the fundamental land use issue at-hand. WPC 9653P -2- -PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMERCIAl-'-C-O-P- PROS: 1. Office commercial development is consistent with General Plan intents for Community Activity Centers. 2. Both permitted and conditional uses under the "C-O-P" zone offer the broadest flexibility for implementing the multi-serving capacity of the "Activity Centers" as established by the General Plan. Allowable uses would provide for health care, professional offices, and financial services (including the applicant's proposed bank). Uses which could be permitted upon approval of a conditional use permit include higher density housing, educational, or public service and institutional uses including a church, post office, day care center, or cultural facil i ty. 3. In conjunction with #2 above, the "Professional and Administrative Commercial" designation would promote land use balance and diversity within the Southwestern College Activity Center, and avoid imbalance resulting from the addition of nearly 4 acres of retail development to the 16! acres already existing. Diversity is highly desirable in the Southwestern College Center given its central geographic location with the Eastern Territories area. 4. The site's visibility, and major intersection location accessible by bus, bi ke, and pedestri an routes makes it ideal for the broader range of community serving and employment uses mentioned above, and would thereby contribute more significantly to vehicular trip reduction than if designated for solely retail type uses. CONS: 1. The Pl anni ng Department does not have i nformat i on on spec Hi c needs for office use within the area. Recent regional reports suggest a slow down in absorption rates within the office market. 2. Certain types of office uses could present a regional or sub-regional character (such as a large corporate office complex) inappropriate to the local "community" serving capacity of the Activity Centers intended by the General Plan. WPC 9653P -3- -MEDIUM-HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (11-18 du/acl PROS: 1. Higher density residential land uses are listed in the General Plan as a typical land use within Community Activity Centers. Such a use would logically fit into the largely residential fabric of surrounding areas. The site's physical, circulatory, and topographic separation from the adjacent church and single family neighborhood effectively eliminate major land use incompatibility concerns with nearby single family neighborhoods. 2. It appears that a medium-high density residential project could be designed in a manner that would mitigate traffic and noise impacts on this site. The Planning Department conducted a field survey of existing higher density residential uses successfully and sensitively located directly adjacent to major arterials with traffic volumes in excess of 33,000 ADT. Additionally, successful noise mitigation can be accomplished in variety of ways other than setbacks, including the use of double pane glass and other building design characteristics. 3. I n accordance wi th the current Hous i ng El ement, and soon to be adopted update, a medium-high density project could provide the opportunity for needed affordable hous i ng un i ts in the Eastern Terri tori es, and promote objectives for achievement of "balanced community". Furthermore, the site is exceptionally well located near to schools, services, and major public transportation routes. 4. Allowable yields up to 18 dulac, as well as potential density bonus for affordable housing, would appear to be economically viable. CONS: 1. Given the site's predominantly C1V1C oriented use context of schools and church, and predominantly single family nature of adjacent neighborhoods, multi-family development could be perceived as being out of character. 2. Site planning and design considerations is response to noise and aesthetic concerns along designated scenic corridors would increase development costs and could represent a barrier to achievement of affordable housing. WPC 9653P -4- APPENDIX ? 3 SUPPLEMENTAL FINDINGS FOR APPLICATION OF .p. MODIFIER Pursuant to General Pl an requi rements for properties on sceni c roadways, and Zoning Ordinance Section 1956.041, the "P" modifying district is applied based on the following: A. The subject property, or the neighborhood or area in which the property is located, is unique by virtue of topography, geological characteristics, access, configuration, traffic circulation or some social or historic situation requiring special handling of the development on a precise plan basis. B. The property or area to which the P modifying district is applied is an area adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the development of a precise plan will allow the area so designated to coexist between land usages which might otherwise prove incompatible. C. The basic or underlying zone regulations do not allow the property owner and/or the city appropriate control or flexibility needed to achieve an efficient and proper relationship among the uses allowed in the adjacent zones. D. The area to which the P modifying district is applied consists of two or more properties under separate ownershi p wherei n coord i nat ion regardi ng access, on-site circulation, site planning, building design and identification is necessary to enhance the public convenience, health, safety and general welfare. In this instance under item 'C', the proposed underlining zone regulations would not allow the City appropriate control to achieve the efficient and proper relationship among the uses allowed in the adjacent zones. The Precise Plan guidelines to be attached to the property shall include: 1. The architectural theme of any proposed development need not be identical to the des i gn theme of the Latter Day Saints Church build i ng located immediately to the east, but shall be designed to be in harmony with and compatible with said structure. 2. The setback established along both Otay Lakes Road and "H" Street shall be not less than 25 feet for any building or parking area. Setbacks for any buildings over 25 feet in height shall be equal to the setback from the front property line. The minimum setback from the radius of the corner shall be 60 feet with the distance measured perpendicular from the corner radius. 3. Eighty percent of the off-street parking area shall be located behind or between buildings so as to not be the predominant feature facing either Otay lakes Road or "H" Street. 4. Pedestrian-oriented areas shall be enhanced through the use of a combination of textured paving, benches, sculptures, and landscaping. WPC 9672P -. mitigated negative declaration PROJECT NAME: Otay Lakes Plaza PRCJiCT LOCATION: Southeast corner of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road ASS~SSOR'S PARCEL NO. 642-020-17 PROJECT APPLICANT: Kelton Title Corporation CAS': NO: IS-90-13 DATf: May 24, 1991 ~V~ -.- ........,;;;:-~..,;;;' _-.:.......,....,.,. - -~- city of chula vlata planning department 01Y Of environmental review _ction. OiUlA VISTA , -2- C. Comoatibilitv with Zonina and Plans The currEnt zoning on-site is R-l (single family residential). The project a~ proposed does not conform with existing zoning. The proposed rezone wou~d change the zoning from R-l to C-C-P (Central Convnercial subject to a Precise Plan), which would permit the proposed use. The existing General Plan Designation for the site is Low-Medium Density Residential (3-6 dwelHng units per acre (du/ac)) with a Special Study overlay. The proposed project is not consistent with this designation. The propo~ed General Plan Amendment would change the land use designation to Retail :onvnercial, which would permit the proposed use. The Special Study overlay established by the Chula Vista City Council in . July 1989, requires the evaluation of alternative land uses for the site. Alternative uses have been evaluated by the Traffic Study prepared in conj'Jnction with this Negative Declaration, and will be addressed by the Planning Department analysis and staff report to be prepared in coPjJnction with the above mentioned General Plan Amendment and Rezoning prOOl.'sa 1 s. D. Comoliance with the Threshold/Standards Po1icv 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls throughout the City within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases (measured annually) and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chu1a Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is approximately 1/4 mile away and would be associated with a less than 2 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The estimated .distance to the nearest Fire Station location is 1/4 mile, with a torresponding response time of less than two minutes. The City of Chu1a Vista currently contracts ambulance service with Hartson Medical Services, which could provide a response time of less than 10 minutes. However, all City Fireman are registered Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT/s) who would provide any necessary medical assistance at the project site within their two minute response time. Therefore, the proposed project compl ies with this Threshold Standard PoHcy. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 call s within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 -3- calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department has not indica":.Ed that they would be unab1 e to serve this project. Therefore, the proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at ~ Lev~l of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of ~e~vice (LOS) "0" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signal ized intersections. No intersection may reach LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the traffic study prepared by an outside consultant and has indicated that with the mitigation measures set forth in the study and this document the proposed project will comply with the Thresholds/Standards Pol icy for Traffic/Circulation. Parks/Recreation 4. ,..-." The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation provides a population ratio of 3 acres of neighborhood and community parkland with appropriate facilities per 1,000 residents east of 1-805. This threshold appl ies only to residential projects. Since the proposed project is a retail commercial use, the Thresholds/Standards Pol icy for Parks/Recreation is not applicable. Drainage The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has indicated that existing off-site drainage facilities would adequately serve the project. There are no existing on-site drainage facilities. The project site is not situated within a flood plain and would not be subject to any existing flooding hazards. The project would therefore comply with this Threshold/Standards PoliCY. 6. Sewer 5. The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. -4- The City Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal with respect to sewage capac~t.y and has indicated that there is an existing sewer line with~I' the immediate vicinity of the project. C;ty Engineering has indicated that the location and size of the existing sewer line is aJequate to serve the project. Drainage improvements to connect to the existing' sewer line would be required. With compliance to the requirements and conditions of the Engineering Department, the proposed project will comply with this Threshold/Standards Policy. 7. Water The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Due to recent drou~ht conditions, as a condition of project approval, the applicant must~agree to a zero net increase in water consumption or participate in ~hatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. E. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project could have one or more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design have implemented specific mitigation measures to reduce these effects to a level of less than significant. The project, as revised, now avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects previously identified, and the preparation of an invironmental Impact Report will not be required. A Mitigated Negative 6 Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitigation measures . have also been set forth in the Mi t i gat ion Mon i tori ng Program wh i ch is attached as Attachment "A". F. Mitigation necessary to avoid sionificant effects Specific project mitigation measures and project redesign have been required to reduce potentially significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study for this project to a level of less than significant. Mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have been made conditions of project approval, as well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Addendum "AW). -5- Traffic circulation and water consumption impacts have been determined to be potentially significant and are required to be reduced to a level of less than significant. A discussion or each of these issues follows. Also included is a discussion of those impacts deemed not significantt which are visual quality schools and land use/community character. Traffic Circulation A traffic study was prepared by P & D Technologies in April of 1991 to address the traffic circulation impact~ associated with the proposed project. The objective of the analysis ~as to verify the adequacy of the existing circulation system and recommtnd necessary improvements where appropriate. . The traffic study addresses a site plan with two entrances/exits to the proposed project instead of the proposed four. The City Traffic Engineer and traffic consultant have conf'~"med that the difference in number of driveways would not affect the traffic analysist as the following summary of the traffic analysis is current and appl icable to the proposed site plan. ..- -6- Level of Service for the segment of Otay Lakes Road south of East H Street now operates at LOS B and will operate, without project and improvements, at LOS E during the projected 1995 near term. With the project and improvements projected near term, the segment will operate at LOS A. The project is anticipated to add approximately 200 ALiT duri ng the peak hour to this segment. This volume (less than 1% of the hourly volume) would not have a significant impact of the segment's level of service. All other roadway segments linked to the intersection now operate at LOS A and are project to continue at this level in the near term. Intersections: As shown on Table 1, the Otay Lakes Road/East H Street intersection currently operates at LOS A during the afternoon (PM) peak hour. The level of service at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and East H Street will worsen due to the projected volume increase associated with development that is already approved. THe P&O study indicated that the intersection of East Hand Otay Lakes Road would operate at a F level of service under the approved maps plus Rancho del Rey SPA III scenario. According to P & 0, this conclusion was based on data from the TPP. However, the TPP did not identify this iO'l:ersection as being critical. Based on follow-up discussion with the TPP consultant (Joe Oliva) and the project traffic consul tant (Ed Pl ank), it appears that there is insufficient information to determine the short term (approved map plus SPA III) impact. Because of Southwestern College, which is a major traffic generator with entrances on both East H Street and Otay Lakes Road prior to this intersection, more data' is needed to determine actual intersection traffic volumes and characteristics. It is, however, recognized that widening of Otay Lakes Road south of East H Street will be necessary to serve build out traffic and that such an improvement will also provide short term relief. Therefore, widening adjacent to the project is considered necessary. Monitoring of traffic through the Growth Management Program will provide adequate time and opportunities to program necessary additional capacity improvements if needed. In summary, there. is insufficient data to determine the extent of intersection improvements needed prior to SR 125. More detailed analysis, including new information about the proposed development of the Otay Ranch coupled with more specific traffic access information relative to the distribution of traffic, will provide a more precise assessment of overall needed intersect i on improvements beyond add i t i ona 1 northbound lane required at this parcel. -7- TABLE 1 Intersection level of Service at Otay lakes Road/East H Street Scenario Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Volume CaDacitv Ratio .53 ~ A Projected 1995 Background Traffic Volumes with Improvements and with Proposed Project .80 C/O Traffic Safetv The proposed project is located directly across East ~: Street from Bonita Vista High School. The high school is attended by approximately 2,000 students. Many of these students walk to school and w~uld be potentially attracted to the services offered by the proposed shopping pl aza. As such, the Sweetwater Union High School District has raised the issue of the safety of students who may cross East H Street from the high school to the shopping plaza. The Sweetwater Union High School District has suggested installation of solid barrier or a "Jersey wall" along the median of East H Street to discourage illegal pedestrian crossings. However, the City Engineering Department does not believe this will be an adequate deterrent and may create potential traffic hazards to motorists. Ci ty Engi neering has, therefore, suggested that a decorative wall wi th more intense landscaping be installed along the high school property line to require students to use the newly constructed steps at the corner. Installation of the wall and landscaping as mitigation measures are included to reduce the potential safety impact to below a level of significance. The proposed project would result in potentially significant traffic/circulation impacts which require project specific mitigation. With compl iance to the mitigation measures as set forth in Section F of this document and in the Mitigation Monitoring Program {Attachment A}, potentially significant traffic/circulation impacts will be reduced below a level of significance. -8- Water Consumotion Because of the severe drought conditions in Southern California, efforts have been made by the City of Chula Vista to reduce cumulative impacts on water consumption. The proposed project could potentially create a cumulative impact on water quality given the existing shortage of adequ~te water supplies. With compliance to mitigation measures set forth in Sect ion F of th is document, potent ia 1 water consumpt ion impacts will be reduced below a level of significance. Mitiaation of Traffic Circulation and Safety Imoacts 1. Dedicate necessary right-of-way and construct an additiol al northbound lane along Otay Lakes Road fronting the project consistent an ultimate six-lane prime arterial. 2. Dedicate necessary right-of-way and construct a transition lane needed for eastbound traffic on East H Street fronting the project consistent with an ultimate six-lane prime arterial roadway. 3. Construct a decorative wall along the high school property 1 ine on East H Street and install landscaping as approved by the Planning Department. 4. Contribute funds to the Development Impact Fees and Traffic Signal Fees financing program. Mitigation of Water Consumotion Imoacts 1. Participate in a no net increase water consumption program, an in-l ieu-of fee offset program, or any other comparable water conservation program that the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of the building permit issuance. G. Findinas of Insignificant Imoact and Imoacts Deemed Less than Sianificant Schools The project is situated within the Chula Vista Elementary School District and Sweetwater Union High School District. District enrollment, within the Chula Vista Elementary School District has been increasing at the rate of 4 - 5 percent per year. Permanent capacity has been exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. It is the School District's opinion 1 I -9- that the project will generate approximately 13 new elementary age chi ldren. The Pl anning Department I s opinion is that conunercial projects do not generate students. The relationship between non-residential development and student enrollment has been recognized by the State through authorization of collection of school fees. To mitigate project impacts on schools services, State law currently provides for a developer fee of $O.26/square foot to be charged for non-residential developments. This fee will assist the financing of facilities needed to serve the growth of both the financing of facilities needed to serve the growth of both school districts. However, the Chula Vista Elementary School District is concerned that the estimated per student facility costs ($8,814/student) will far exceed maximum allowable developer fees that are collectable. Given this shortfall, the school district has reconunended developer participation in alternative financing mechanisms to help assure that facilities will be available to serve children generated by new construction. The Chula Vista School District maintains that participation in a Community Facilities District (CFD) could be accomplished in lieu of developer fees. However, the City of Chula Vista has no mechan ism in place to requ ire the developer to pay anyth i ng over and above the State-mandated fees. Visual Quality The proposed project will change a vacant lot into a developed parcel thereby creating a change in the visual environment. Potential visual impacts have been deemed less than significant due to the urbanized nature of the surrounding area particularly the four corners of the intersection at East H Street and Otay lakes Road as mentioned previously, the northwest corner of the intersection is a commercial center providing small food establishments, neighborhood specialty shops, and a major grocery store. The northeast corner of the intersection supports a high school. The southwest corner is a vacant lot which is adjacent to Southwestern College. And behind the proposed project site is a church and associated parking lot. While the proposed project would represent a change to the subject site, the development would be visually compatible with the surrounding built-up area. land Use/Community Character The proposed project would create a change in existing land use from a vacant lot to a developed commercial shopping plaza. In addition, the proposed use would require a Rezone and General Plan Amendment to change the existing single-family residential zoning and land use designation of the proj ect site. The surround i ng 1 and uses are urban i zed conunerc ia 1 , public facility, residential and institutional uses. ~-"'''''-----'''''''--''~'''''~'--'-'---'-''---'-'~-~--'''-''---'.,. -10- Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal cOlllllunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project would not substantially degrade the quality of the environment, threaten to eliminate sensitive plant or animal species, nor threaten to eliminate important cultural resources. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-tenn environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-tenn environmental goals. The project would not achieve short term environ~ental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals, since long-term goals will be achieved through strict compliance to the Mitigation Measures outlined herein. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, .cumulatively considerable. means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. The project is not associated with cumulatively considerable impacts, since project specific mitigation has been implemented to reduce potentially significant impacts to less than significant. 4. The environmen~al effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project is not associated with any significant, adverse impacts to human beings. No human health impacts were identified in the Initial Study conducted for this report. (- .. -11- H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Oraanizations City of Chu1a Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken larsen, Director of Building and Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department Rick Carpenter, Planning Barbara Reid, Planning Chu1a Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Hedenkamp & Associates 2. Documents East H Street/Otay lakes Road Traffic Study, P & D Technologies, April 1991 . 3. Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as any comments on the Initial Study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chu1a Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chu1a Vista, CA 92010. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 12/90) WPC 9461P . "'UL..-J.Ilr"J.':1':'~ 1::>;4'::j r-1'(U1'1 J-t:,lllet'(!-!'lC!1'I1 TI'l:/C:::lII'(HVH IU b'::jl::>i'(l P.~2 .- . . - ) II J I I I If ! .. .. J B . 6 BB 6 - 6 " I I . I J II I I J B 6 66 B 6 I) lil IE IiI 1~ It i lli lif lSl c II I llUilh UnUh Irl1 II" II ~ lilt I J II h n 6'1 n 6 II IE I IiI i;1 I~ .I 0'1- II lIt lIt i1 II J6fl I I.. I. II 11 t~J rll 1111 'Ii IIJ"" J. It.!: 'illl ~t !l~ ~ ~ I ! I .;1 III 111 181 )~ I In) {il Iii I! I Hh 11 I Iii 1,1 JI lilt \ It I~ :ir 111 ..I if I IU" II !J I ul t~,h jt" h Ii . 1 1 II 1 Ii 1 11 11 I lin 1111 It II It1u ~II t ~in" !I"I ,1 . I ~ lIB ei II .1 .,.: 01 TOTFl.. P. 02 .. ""~-~~..;,.-,"--...,-"""....,.,~--""""..=_.",,,...,,.,.,:>.,..,..,.... ""~' . ......~"""-~<"."..'~....- ''''''.^~ . August 5, 1991 ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, IS-90-13, MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR OTAY LAKES PLAZA TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND SPECIAL STUDY AREA TO CENTRAL COMMERCIAL I. INTRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present: 1. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; 2. Additional or refined environmental data available since completion of the Final EIR does not indicate any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; and 3. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration. This addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information regarding project impacts. As a result of the analysis, the basic conclusions of the Negative Declaration have not changed. 1. Barrier to Deter Illeoal Pedestrian Crossino The Engineering Department, while still requiring a barrier to deter illegal pedestrian crossings on H Street between the Bonita Vista High School and the Otay Lakes Plaza recommend that the details of this barrier be worked out to the satisfaction of the high school, the community and the City. Therefore, within Section F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects, page 7, paragraph 1, the 1 ast two sentences shoul d be deleted and the following inserted: "City Engineering has, therefore, indicated that a pedestrian barrier be installed along the East H Street frontage consisting of a decorative block wall or an equivalent aesthetically designed barrier agreeable to the high school and the City. Installation of such a barrier is included as a mitigation measure to reduce the potent i a 1 safety impact to below a level of significance." Mitigation Measure No.3 on Page 8 and "Attachment AI' would be amended as follows: Page 8: "Construct a decorative wall or an aesthetically designed barrier agreeable school, the community, and the City." equivalent to the high Attachment A: Traffic Circulation and Study "The app 1 i cant shall construct a decor at i ve wall or an equivalent aesthetically designed barrier agreeable to the high school, the Community and the City." All other information under Mitigation Measure 3 on "Attachment A" remains the same. 2. Widening of Otav Lakes Road and East H Street The Engineering Department has reconsidered the requirement to construct Otay Lakes Road and East H Street adjacent to the project to six lane prime arterial standards. In lieu of constructing the improvements, the applicant will be required to dedicate the necessary right-of-way. Street improvement costs will be incorporated into the City's Development Impact Fee Program and constructed when traffic conditions necessitate that the additional capacity be provided. Within Section F, "Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects", under "Intersections" on page 6, within the second paragraph - the following two sentences should be deleted: "It is, however, recognized that the widening of Otay lakes Road south of East H Street wi 11 be necessary to serve bu il dout tra ffi c and that such an improvement will also provide short-term relief. Therefore, widening adjacent to the project is considered necessary." The following two sentences should be substituted. "It is, however, recognized that the eventual widening of Otay lakes Road south of East H Street wi 11 be necessary to serve bui1dout traffic. However, this widening is not needed at this time. The improvements will be incorporated into the City's Development Impact Fee Program." Section F, "Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects", page 8, Mitigation Measure! should be deleted and the following substituted: "Dedicate right-of-way along Otay lakes Road and East H Street fronting the project adequate to provide for a project consistent with an ultimate six-lane prime arterial roadway." -2- Attachment A Mitigation Measure 1 should be deleted and the following substituted: Under Mitiaation Measure 1. The appl icant shall dedicate necessary right-of-way along Otay lakes Road and East H Street frontage adequate to provide a six-lane prime arterial roadway. WPC 9670P -3- ~~~ -.- .......,;;;-~....,;' . ,~=~ city of chula vista planning department 01Y OF environmental revle. section _ CHUlA VISTA . negative declaration ~.AL. TERNA TE:' PROJECT NAME: Otay Lakes Plaza PROJECT LOCATION: Southeast corner of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 642-020-17 PROJECT APPLICANT: Kelton Title Corporation CASE NO: IS-90-13 ALTERNATE DATE: July 18, 1991 A. Project SettinQ The project site is a vacant triangular-shaped lot comprised of 4.32 gross acres 1 oc~ted on the southeast corner of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road. East H Street borders the property on the north and Otay Lakes Road borders the property on the west. The site is situated within an area which is largely developed. Surrounding land uses include Bonita Vista High School to the north, a church parking lot and fire station to the south, a church to the east, and a vacant lot surrounded by the parking lots of Southwestern Junior College across Otay Lakes Road to the west. The northwest corner of the intersect ion of East H Street and Otay Lakes Road is fully developed with Bonita Point Plaza. The plaza consists of a supermarket, drug store, full service gas station, banks, fast-food restaurants, and other community-serving retail shops. The site has been disturbed by previous grading. On-site grading has created two level - pads, o.ne tiered at a higher elevation than the other. Slope gradients of the pads are generally level, with slopes ranging between 1% and 5%. Construction debris is found scattered throughout the property, and there is no existing vegetation on the site other than evasive grasses and weeds. WPC 9554P (7/17/91> -2- The Special Study overlay established by the Chu1a Vista City Council in July 1989, requires the evaluation of alternative land uses for the site. A 1 ternat i ve uses have been evaluated by the Traffi c Study prepared for a variety of 1 and uses in conjunction with thi s Negati ve Dec1 aration, and will be addressed by the Planning Department analysis and staff report to be prepared in conjunction with the above mentioned General Plan Amendment and Rezoning proposals. D. ComDliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls throughout the City within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases (measured annually) and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chu1a Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is approximately 1/4 mile away and would be associated with a less than 2 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The estimated distance to the nearest Fire Station location is 1/4 mile, with a corresponding response time of less than two minutes. The City of Chu1a Vista currently contracts ambulance service with Hartson Medical Services, which could provide a response time of less than 10 minutes. However, all City Fireman are registered Emergency Medical Technicians (EMT's) who would provide any necessary medical assistance at the project site within their two minute response time. Therefore, the proposed project comp1 ies wi th thi s Threshold Standard Policy. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 mi nutes or 1 ess . Pol ice un i ts must respond to 62.10% of Pri ori ty 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department has not indicated that they would be unable to serve this project. Therefore, the proposed project will. comply with this Threshold Policy. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requ i res that all intersect ions must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "CO or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. No intersection may reach LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. WPC 9554P (7/17/91' l "..~- ~,- -3- The City Traffic Engineer has reviewed the traffic study prepared by an outside consultant. An additional traffic study may be needed when a specific project is proposed in order to verify existing findings and potentially recommend mitigation measures. Parks/Recreation The Threshold/Standards Pol icy for Parks and Recreation provides a population ratio of 3 acres of neighborhood and community parkland with appropriate facilities per 1,000 residents east of I-80S. This threshold applies only to residential projects. Since the proposed project is a retail commercial use, the Thresholds/Standards Pol icy for Parks/Recr~ation is not applicable. 5. Drainage 4. The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consi stent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The Engineering Department has reviewed the proposed project and has indicated that existing off-site drainage facilities would adequately serve the project. There are no existing on-site drainage facilities. The project site is not situated within a flood plain and would not be subject to any existing flooding hazards. The project would therefore comply with this Threshold/Standards Policy. 6. Sewer 7. The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the proposal with respect to sewage capacity and has indicated that there is an exi sting sewer 1 ine within the immediate vicinity of the project. City Engineering has indicated that the location and size of the existing sewer line is adequate to serve the project. Drainage improvements to connect to the existing sewer line would be required. With compliance to the requirements and conditions of the Engineering Department, the proposed project will comply with this Threshold/Standards Policy. Water The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission faci 1 ities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. WPC 9554P (7/17/91) -4- Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the app 1 i cant must agree to a zero net "i ncrease in water consumpt ion or participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. E. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed convnercial retail project could have one or more significant environmental effects. Subsequent revisions in the project design have implemented specific mitigation measures to reduce these effects to a level of less than significant. The development of this site as a commercial office center according to mitigation measures developed by City staff, now avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects previously identified, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. Mitiaation necessarv to avoid significant effects As there is not a specific project proposed but only a general plan amendment, no significant effects are expected and no mitigation measures are necessary. Traffic Circulation A traffic study was prepared by P & D Technologies in April of 1991 to address the traffic ci rcul at ion impacts associated with a retai 1 commercial center and several land use alternatives including office commercial use. The objective of the analysis was to verify the adequacy of the existing circulation system and recommend necessary improvements where appropriate. City staff calculated the average daily trip generation for an office commercial use based on a SANDAG formula. On this site, it was estimated at 1,300 trips per day. This represents less trips than a retail commercial would generate. At this time, no mitigation is required as .there is no specific project proposed. In the event that a specific project is proposed 1n the future, mitigation as proposed in the above cited traffic study would be applicable. Water ConsumDtion Since no immediate project is proposed 1n conjunction with the recommended land use designation changes, no impact on water consumption will occur. WPC 9554P (7/17/91) -5- G. Findinas of Insianificant ImDact and ImDacts Deemed less than Significant Schools The impacts on schools will be addressed in the environmental review at the time a specific project is proposed. Visual Quality Since no immediate project is proposed in conjunction with the recommended land use designation changes, no visual quality impact will occur. land Use/Community Character Since no immediate project is proposed in conjunction with the recommended land use designation changes, no impact on land use or community character. Based on the following findings, it is determined that the land use designation changes described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wil dl i fe spec i es, cause a fi sh or wil dl i fe popu 1 at i on to drop be low self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered pl ant or animal, or el iminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed changes in land use designation degrade the quality of the environment, sensitiye plant or animal species, nor important cultural resources. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. would not substantially threaten to eliminate threaten to eliminate The changes would not achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. 3. The project has possible effects which, are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, .cumulatively considerable. lleans that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. Only a general amendment is being determined not a specific project. WPC 9554P (7/17/91> -6- 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The proposed changes are not associated with any significant, adverse impacts to human beings. No human health impacts were identified in the Initial Study conducted for this report. H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Oraanizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken larsen, Director of Building and Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department Rick Carpenter, Planning Barbara Reid, Planning Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Hedenkamp & Associates 2. Documents East H Street/Otay lakes Road Traffic Study, P & D Technologies, April 1991 3. Initial Study This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as any comments on the Initial Study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. Q;~~~INATOR EN 6 (Rev. 12/90) WPC 9554P (7/17/91) /.~ ( () A. IACKQROUND ..:.f'.r' . ~:,..,>...:.). .f ' . FOR OFFICE USE Co.slNO. ~;;~ 4 Fl. .' R '/ A- R"C'll~t =D. .. . .. Dati .Ic'd '~~J'.P Accepted by. . . Pr.~J.ct . No. -:::A V v:?' ,.. ".- ." . .< . .,'- INITIAL STUDY Ci ~ of Chul. lista . .. App11catfon Fonn' . " -- -- -..--- .~.....:..._-. '-.'-'---" -. '!:... ~ . . 1. . ,ROOECT TITLE ,~. -MAY LAKES PLAZA ." . . ,. 2. ,RooteT Lf&~JlOR lS~~et..dd"l_s::or .scrfpt1o~:- SEC Basi "H" and Otaf Lakes Road " .' .'. n. ".". . - .,. ..... ...... '. .., .. . - . Ass~s.s()rl~!Ook,.,page'~. ..r~r~el N~, .~ '642;;.020-17' : BRIEF PROO'ECT DESCRIPTION . ,~;:;, . Street 3. . . , I' ". .' '..,;", . . .-', .-.... . -.:' ~. . . .. "'. .'. . . .'. .. Name ofApp1fG..n~. . KELTON TITLE CORP.' Ad..dress.. 2716 OCEAN' pm BLVD. . STE.3006::Pha~e. 213-396-4514 Cit.r SANTA "MONICA':: .' ':$~~' CA.' "..~.. :'ztp '. ' '90405 5. 'HlM ofPrtplre"r/Agent ". .....:. '. . ". ~ ., -- Adnl'.... ..: . ". '. .':::'~'.' " '.' i '::,:,~:. .... .":: ....:... .... ~:Phone' ',:. . . . ' -, , Citi..'. ~. '.~ ..' .' .:State "':'..:' ...... 'Zip' '. ...., , . '. .. '. ~1ation to"AppHcint.::', ," .' . . '. .' ." . G. , 'Indicate ill ,ermfts or approval s an~enc"'osu're~" ~r:. doc;u.nents . required by the Env1ronmental~ev1ew Coordfnlto~. ,'.. . -. .. . . . ..'.. .,.' . .: ....:. '; '. . , .,'. '. < ,': ...\-. ' I. "Nits or approvals required::' . '.' . , . .' . . . '. . . x Genera' Plan Rev1S10"_':OISign Review CoU.n1ttee~ Public . ProJect '. -r Rezonfng/Prezon1ng '.' Tentative Subd. Map '. - ; '. .' Annexlt1or( - Precise "an .-'Grading Permit .'; . --- Design Review Board - Specific Plln . .- Tentative Parcel Mop .- '. - Redevelopment. Agency - Cond. Use Permit .- Site Plan I Arch. Review~: . . . - Va1'f Inc. ' - Other - .-' b. Enclo'UN~" or d~~ritl (IS required by the Envfronaenta1 Review , Coof'dt nator. ). . ,. '., ..' ....,.:.... >. .' '. "- ..' ....: '.' '. . ~ " ... . .... . ".': . . x Location Nip '. '.' ',' ~,~h'..'-!'eYltfons: _.', - . . ~:Eng: leo1ogy RePort - Irading Plln.. .... Llnds,oPl P1In$'" . ttydro1ogfca' Study - Site Plan' ..~ Photos of Site a '-:--',Biolagic.l Stu~ ,.-----: Plrce' Maf :. .' . .'.7 Setting .',. '. . ~Ar.ch.eo1ogfc.1 Survey -Precise P an '.' ..;. : Tentat1ve' SUbd. Map -. - Noise Assessment ~. - Specific "an " . . .- blprovament Plans .- Traffic lmplct Report - Other Agency ,...1 t or = $011 s Report '. = Other ' -Approvala.Requ'.rtcl' '.' ..,. . , ~:'\ "" ._. .~ ';I . : " '4' ~ i \ (I ,) I - . -' ~ .. B. PROPOSEDPRBJECT " .- . ..' ~ .---.--- . . , 1. LInd Art a I. sq. .'oottse. . ..:~"".~ .01' .c~age'. NET APPROX. 3.'7 ACRES . If. 1.nf'N~.to ~'.ded1c.ted. state':.c~age.ln~ purpose.. . . ' '. .... .' . - - .' . .' :. . . .. : . . . . . . . .' . . . .. . '. ...~. .' . ". .... .' . ." . ." ", . "'.:. . z. . .' . . A . .Complete, ~fs':lec~1on .ff. proJect 1i residentia' . .' .... . .1. TYpe .vllopment: $1~81e family '.. "Two famf11 , Mu'~1, ',..f13,": . '. Townhouse . ".: ..' CondoMfn1&In b.Number of . strUc tures' and :be1ghts' " . , .".. -.. . - . ~ . . '.' . - ", ." . . ,,'," . c. ..~er..~f U~.~ts:. '1 "dr'~om ., 2 bedrooms ' . ~ ~ed"o~s .':,' '. '.:4 bedrooms ' . Tota,'u~1~1 to. " ') d."'0~~dtnS1t.Y (~U/tot~l' Icrest . ' ,. Net ~n.lf\)r(pUltotl' leres 1I1nus~ny dedic:~tt~nJ. ' f. 'Est1.~dpro~ec't po~u'it1on . '. . : c.... G. Estf..ted sale or ".ntal price r~ng.a . h. SqU1r:e footage 0" f1o~r .irel(s) :'. . :" f. Percent of 10t coverlge by bul1 d1 ngs . or structUres . j. Nuliber of ~~~$fte Plrking "pace~,to'be' P~o~f'deci:' . k. perctnt\lf,~f~fr rciid. end PUt~ .urfl~t.\ ...... .... . 3. COmplete ~1s .e~~1~n.1! ~roject is comnercfa' .~" ~~d~~tr1a'. . 1.T1ptCs) of land,use ~TAi~ COMMERCIAL: ;' :'~" ;. '. b. . Floorarea"38 ,000 'sf ..~st.F~e1jbt .OfltNlctUre(s). I-STORY' . ". ..... "7 . _ - . . "' . r . c. 1"1PIO" CO~ltruct1on aised'n th~ 'Itructur8.'~~PE' V-N.(Wood Frame ,.:. and $tu6co) . .,'. " . . .....: ;'.~::'~': ....:'... . d. .' 'Describe '-..J'o".lcc'~s~1n~s ':tottle ~~~c~feS~;"~dthe orf.ntatfon'toldjo1ntng pro";rtfes and.'streets Unknown at this time. ~. .., '., -.' '. '. " ,- -'" ". . Precise. Dlanto ~. ~~bm~tted.lat~r wi_~~ de~ermine. I. .lIuIIber of:.On-li~'lrk1~9 space$ proY1~e'd.' _ 220'" '. .' , f. l,tiNted mIlDer of ellp1o,yees p'er Ih1f~'UNKNOWN.' NlIDber of . .;...- . :.. - .' " . - .' . .: .' . '":," . :.,hft~. " ...... . " ,J'ot.a' . . '. '. .: ....,~ .;..... I. Elt1Mted. ft'.er' or .~u~_;'$. (per d~). and "b'.SfS of e.tf..lte ~ 180'0 .~. : '. . . .. . '. . '.' .... . .... .: ..... . v- ., '.' ! ' .' r -._- " , ;', .~ . I . , . -,.. . __ .... I .,.,..~ ( ( ')_. 1lfI..4o ""'- , ..,... " . . ,. '; ~. '. -.'3 - . . ",. ~ . h." Est.t"~d range of .ervfce' lrel and blsi. of ,i'tf.ate .IMMEDIATE AREA ". . .... . ",:' . .<\ .:' '.. -. ..:.:. .' .L:..... ,...-.,". .... . ", -', '-"_ . .;..~.,.._... " ."..~.. ;',: ~... - .': . .' " _ . _ ,. --. _', :. '.. .._.. . :'p~~~.. Pi~$.z.~G. . .(DROP~iN). :TRAFF1C. . . . .' :rnt/~x~.nt.~f,.operi't.i~n.' not. in....~n~lose.d 'buf.ld1.~gs .' ,-.,' .. '.' ..,...-..:..:- '. : .'::."; ::. ':.' ..' : " ,>:'. :: .'; ,~.'. ::~.';:':':.' .-- <;,:':.:' ':~ ::--'::,':',' ';'." .' . f. . . ~. . . , -' . J. ' Ita'urlof' Operation"':: UNKNOWN 'AT ftIS'TIME .:.;...... .' .,. , . .' . 'p' . . . " . It.'" '-'TyPe of-.:exterfor 1fgh~fnf UNKNOWN AT' THIS TIME" . . . . . . ':'~' . :. :. ..... . ." . . ". -Po ..' 4. If project is other than re'sf.nt1al', "~~rcf.l' or fndu~trfal . .~omplete.thfl 1.~t1on. · I.' type of project b. 1'1pt of flc:t11ttes. proV~.ded c.~ulre ~e~~ of e~cloled structures d.. Height ~~. str'uctu~(s) .;. ....x11IWIlJ e. U'ti~te occuplnc11.01.d ~~ project' '" . f, Nuniber of on-site park1nglpaces. t,c)be prov1.ded. . 9. Square feet of road Ind paved surfaces. ,. .. . . . . C. PROOECT CHARAC'TERISTICS .." ...,;. .' . '. . ',. ~ .... I"~ . '. . " . . . ,.' . . "':~f' ,- '. ':. . 1.' If tht project could relu~.t 'fn the d1re~t emission' '0'-.1111 afr pol1utlntl, .(t\Ydrocarbons.,sul fur, dust, ~tc.) ..1de~~f1'1 ,'them. . ;! '. '. ' " '..' . "Ii.. . : N/A ...... ': :. '.. ,,~:'. '~:" .' . '. ." '. ':'. . . .... -0:.;..;. ...... " .', . ,,'.. .". . '.' ','" ,: . 2. . '11 any type of Srad1ng o'~ .-xc~Ylt10.nof. the 'p~oP~~t.V'~.n~'icip.ted' :. (If 1", compl.tethe. following:) _ :". ,." ..',:. ...., . . ". '.' . . . '. .' .'. '. - . .: . '","... -. . . '. : ',' ~'. . I. Exc1Ud1n, trenches to be ~i.ckfnledJ hOw ...ity. c'ubfC. 'yards of '.' ..I"th wi 1 be excaYlte~t. :'. .:!:4S,OOu 'YARDS ;. "'. ';":'. : ... . :'..:-: .~~ ~'., ~.''''. .:.. :.'~_ .: ',' ?' . '.' .:'- .... '" ... 'f....".". '.' .,' .'. b. 1tow'~~.C~~f~.I~~dS ~fff}~ will b,.pl.ce~~"~ :t"37~OOO YARDS c. ,How '~Ch.~r~~:~lq. f~.,:~r.~creS)".~11 ~. '~~.de~!- .3.6-7 AC. (PREV.GRADED) d. "'it w11l be. 'the ..-:-' Maxf~um depth of.eut ....10 FT." . ........ .",.'" :,'.,':"c': ..~AV.~II~ depth' '~f' ~"t. '.9-10 'FT.'--' : ~ ,"":: .'.,. '.~-~' :.:.. :"'x1'. depth "0" f1'11' '.'ll' n<':'-: >- -: ',.', . . '.' '. . ~. '. ~ " '." . . .;. .: ~ .~.'".-".'. ':.: .,'~' "':'~Yeri'g~depth of f111.'.3iFT. ..' " . ~ '. . . . .,; .. - '. ,I , .." '.' l\ _J t. ",' ; . . ". . ". .. .' .....; " :'..- ..... -: . ...~.. -' . ':.' :,::~.:~~,~,;,: ", . .' .... ..: '. '.' '.. I .' . .: t... . .... '. '. . ... "~:~:~ ~ ,';..':' . '. .' '.'; . J:' :;.: ':':".<: : ....... . ". _ . ..... . .: " .' .' .,' "" :.. .' " . ..' .:/,:i~:':~. . S..' . De~C~~b~<l11~'~~Li.~~n~~i~a::V1~r~"~;fCJ~~i,i.~::,~(::'~ '~ipOS~d . . .' .' '~:1J:i: : p1"oj.c~;...nd ~~':t.Yp.e. 'of~.ener9Y,.us~~tJ~fr.' cond.1 t10ni.ng'~'.electr1ca' -~.' ..... appl f.nc.'~ .'.he.at~~g":,q~1~nt.~ '.et~i.)~S71WDARD' ELECTRI'CALiPPT~1'i\N("F.~, HEATING' AND' AIRCONDITI~NING.':' .:.:':. ;'.' .... ,':'~ .:..' :",..... ....... '. . :--..... . ':' . . .".::1 . .', ,',,' ".;c'~" ': . ...::~,.",:._""...,-~..:.:..:,..:!~:;.....:..~.;.,,~~..;'_.".'\'.........;,....~:...':~.:.............,'......:._. ." "-. - .,' . .". ",' ". .:.:.~..."..~... .,...\..:~:~..::'...:~.........:.~.:,..;~..:< ..~:.:.. .l...~..'....~~.:~:.,~.,..::. ..._~.-~:-~.':"?;.....:3/...~::.:.::..'.. ....,..-..: _. ':.', .:"';'; :_:.:.., 4.. Ind~c.te .~e:.I.IIO~"t..~f. n~.tu'ral ope'f." ~pace:.t~.~~.Jfp..r'~..,9.f.~e pr~3~~t . ,(.~.~ \: .~~~.:~:,~.:~3:~.f::~:::~~~.\. :~..:::~....:~~:~:.~~,.;.:..;:....;~~:~;...:~:..:.:.~.:...~;~:.:...:...~:;;.':;;,~:.:;~~..~~;::.:...:.::~'~:;.:'.::':.:.::.., :. .L',':' :: :':'.. . .. 5.' .' Ifth~.:Pro~ict'-':lrll1:~~s.Ur~.. f.,' .lni.jemp,-~YrIie.nf~~ppo.rtunit1es describe". '. the Ratu",. and 'VJ)e of .these.jobs~:. EMPLOYEMEN1".ASSOCIATEO'. WITH . . TYPICAL .RE.~AIL:COM,:MERctAL' ACTIVITIES'..'...".'.:...::,:.. ;.. .... .C.:." . . . .' .:",.:.:.:............'!.."f':;.~.....-:.:.:,.. :....,'.... ....... :.. ....~....:...............:...:..:.._..:..;~.::.~:~\.~..!;. .... .". . . .6.; JI111 hfghl1.fl.-b1e :~r'P9terit11;1'y e.xp'o.si.ye:'.~a~~r1.al~...~r< '. . '.. '. '. .ubsta~es.~e ~~'~.~r.stQr~d.w1~hfn 't:h~.pr'oje.ct:.....,::..:.:. ..... . "site? . :'1~O" ...;:'~..i'....:--:....:~:.::.::. ....', ': .' ..-.........',,'. .,'..:....,. ." . . : . :'.';' ..;..:;:.;;. '::::.' .<....". :::.,,'. :', ..:.:..;<::.):.;;';;\. ..: ';. :: ..' '~'..:'__";,,:<,:..:.;.o.:~:.:::::~~.",:-'::.>,:' :,~ <' : '::- ::: :.... ;..... .' .7.... 'How .in.Y't"lt".'~d'iutOino~11e'trfps~.. per.' d~'y~ .~1.1l..b....:gen~rite~ by': the projectt.;-' .' :';: ..','.~'-c'.'..:' .' .. .,' . ~ .~: . ..' ...:._,..:" . . ~- :-::-. ~.,'::':".;':'. ~:'.'::M,~'.'~':_ ...:. . ..~"-".:~...'.!.:" >' .:...........~:.~~...(::~r_.~.. . .','. .....,0: ':; ':. . .8. .' :Oescrfb~.' Hf:lnyl"off~sitf:fmprovementrJtecessar'y<~o;iinpie.ment' the.... . : proJect.. andth,fr:'po1nt$ .of access or 'c~nnect1on ~o' th~ proj~ct .. site. Improvements fn'c'ud~ but not .1fmfted to.~h~'.fQl1ow1n9::'.~'netl .' .st~etsi .I~teet wfdenfr!gr~x~ens10n'pf..9os~..e'e;tr.~c~.:.n(.sewe.r" .' .' . 1 fnesr .cu~' and.fj1 "'slopes;.~ and pedes.trflna~.d :~icl~le':f.~n 1~1es.. . '. .:'. '. . ,:=:;.';!' ::'..:.::. ~ ':'~':.':'> '.:;~..::.::~.>~<:. .:.::'. -:~::: :i:;' ~<.',;:', ":";:.:.: ::;. ::;L';:',:.~.~~>~?:}~~!-.'\~~~/>'~.. :;.<:t~ :',~>' .':..::'. .' '. . . .; '. .... .. ..". ". .... . ". . '~.~'~~'~~~~~0~~\:~':"" ". . '.' . .: .... .....~.:.. ~'Hos ''::;geo1og~f'stu'dy:;;~een :~'ond.u.~ted.. or('the':'~prop~.~'ijJ:';~O~';':"'~;":/':':':': ....... :.. : : .,', .' .: '.': .(If 'yes~: p1ease' :attach r-::~'" ..:."',;:.,.... :. .... :':.'>:'.:"\' ~:..::," .';.i....-.~ :~., "v. ..-..~. ,..... '. .,.' . ... .-.. ~ . .....,.. . ;.~ ..:.~.~~:.~:'.:..~.:~..-:.:..:;.~..;.:).f,.:......~.....'.,.~ "'~~~.'~'~:'.:."'~::? :.~4:.:::,:... .::....:'..~~.~~~:... '~:~:~;;~:~'.:';.~.~':'.'..' ..;..... ~;> .' . ." .... ". HIS'" ~SO.1.;(Report::Q.~..:-tti_... pr~.j~ct..sfte :,beeri- made.?'~ LNO-:' '::--:". ,":.' . .- . .-- : '. . . : . .': .(11'1'., 'pl~~e ~.t~c~).::. .'.: :: .- .::.....:',.. ...:..~., ::';:..:": ','; ::......:\....... :..... . .' . ..... '. .:" '. ;' ". ....,.'- .;".:. :~.:......;..~:~~~..:::;:.r..:..:<'..~:. .......: ':;.;.... ,,: ..~~\.,?;.. ......;.:~,: :...<.::...~j,\..~.. ,'.<:~. . ':". '. '.' .,....:. . . .2. ,!tYdro1oil; .... ..'. ..... .... " '.' ..... . ...-. '.; '..'~ ,..... '.'" '. .. :".",'. . ," '.' '.' . .." .. . '., ". ~."'..' :!.~.:...: ...:." ;.;.~~;;:;:.;~.<,~~~~;:~:,~~:<>~~~~~.,:<:~?~.~.:.::.:<.~:.~~~:..~:::::~~:~~:;O~;.~:.?t.~.:i:.7:tL.;~:..:.;,:~:>:':'!>:":.':':";"-.':. "- '.' . '.' , ". ..' ':'. '.' ., ...AN. any ':of :'the"'f.ol1 ow; 09 feat~~~$. pre'sen~' on<oi'!.' a.djocent t~ the' . .:'. . .. . '. . ....:. :,-.~. ::.'.1~e~.\"NO'<'''''':,:;:~>~Y-f;;:'''::::'''L';'.' q!::le"~I:.'~1~'~~ e~pl..1n In. 4~~p..') ":-:" . .. ':, . . '.~.:' r.~: '."~':'. ~ I.. .'-'~.''''::.';.~~,;"~,:_,,,_~,~~,'1.::.:'''<Y:'~',,~:~,>,,:,I!". :~'-,.,':"'."-::'_~';"':':~..~;~,-:._;~'''';.'..~.:'...~:_-:~~.~<.: "~':;.~'~-r.~<.:'." .'....~ . ...... . '.i~':'Is::there '~"i\Y;~surf.ce"ev1.~~'iice.'of':1 :;'sh~":ow .9roMn~ ,water'.' .." . '.. "~.'.,.:. ..' '.,',;...' .':b. .-"~t~~~;~~;.~~~~~~~.',~q;~i~J';;;~;i~;~~~~~:~~'~~ -o~~:' ...... .:.... '~.~." .' .' ." . .. . 'acijlcent.tottte s1te?.;....NO..: .."......<:"... ,...q. ~.'" --." .:~."." .-,. ..... '- :,".' .; . ':, _ ......:r :'.' .:;.t0~?~~J:;-[~f~:t~tJ:,i-;,f:-" '. .".':~,':D.;,::':';':'?\1[::\":.:, '., . .:'.. ;.. "'. . . _ .__ '. ..' ..;': i :':;<.'::,~;:;:,:::/:':':~,,:;/,,'\:'::::;;',;:~:,,;':"5:',;:;.;'y;': : c.:.:';' .y:\~-.-:. ........-i:-/}:;~:;~;;:.~.~~:~.;~~:."':;:~.;~<:'..~:.:.. ~ ":.".>.r.: . ;:-:. .... .~ ~ .: .." "",:. . : ... . · t.a .' ) ( ( '. " . . . ,', .. ..' 00 , '-.. . ".:. ,"' . . . ..;:';.;;,.:;,;j)':,;:: .",},;~'5 ~ :, ,:", ,:,";;;'g,{(;;:: :', .,,'., ~..' ~~OQ'es':.~r~nQf'(fr9"th~~:p~~j,ec'f~i~:~~r~ln',4H~~c~lY>~~~. or:tow~rd' .:..' ~~.~.~.tt~~~~.r.::~~~~~..Y:~.'.).kt,~:~~~r.~~.t~'~~~.~~~.l: . .; '.: .:',> ..,': '.' .. eO" N(:) ........i'_':~. ........... f. ....-... ..... .;".;, ~""'.' Ji.....:..... ~..*-,. ,- . " .:' i;., ";" .i;.:.;.~.. :"~ -;::.~ '.i .~.. ~...~. :....:....:. - ::l;:.... : . .. . ~ .;.: :: ...1~.<~;~-==-~~.~. /-. '.' . . "("';:'~'" ;. ~..~ r ~ -',: .<:~... '. \;::'....;:. ;: . .,". . ~' ".d. -: '.Cou1 d .~.".'~ ,iige fr~ft)' ttt.....11 te'. .,.Ule'" e'r.os.i ~ri .~r.: '~'n~i'tf.o~ '.~ '.. .Idjacent :areas? "':" ":;'NO'; .,' ':.;;.;': .::::;,.;.1;..; ~ :'.".;":; :::..":':~,'~';';::. ;;-:';.'~:'\: \';":: . .,.~": ::'..;'~ ':.::,;l~~..r.:...):(:~;\~,:-::": ::'-.:"'::';.~:';:"-i'!: .<>....~;::.(:.;.~ :'.:'I'.:.:..,:;.:::t::.:~:::;-.? ).~~'::~":>';. ,,: <:' '''::':.;,,;:. 'e~'. '..oescrfbe'~ll :'drI1~~ge.'f~c1J~.~1.es:~"btf:proy~~ed::.nd. th~1r.::." ~. .~..'. Not I?Tt2;T,j;r)7~,:,~.);( . ';,':;~:;;;;,:,<j',i1i:."i:,~r~t;~:,;;;,;,:~;:;,:"_:', .... . .. '. .W111 ~e.re. ~e"~nY .no1s.e'\genera~d . from' .the.'pr<?PQ$e'd project. s1~ . or.. from points 'of access which may. .1mpa.et ~he ;surroun~1ng or' . .'. .' Idj.lC~~tJ andusest..::;:-.. :N(),; ..' ":.: .... f:.," > <~,:>:,;:: ::;:. ;:,',' . "':'::':'" .- ... . . .... '::-:':~'~':~:~:.."'~:\. :..':~. ._~".~:.:-;-. .....:...~.:::'~...:.:.._.~:.. .... . ~..::.-.;..:...:: .:".:: 't.;.':.":;;'.t..:.:..:.:,~,., <<'l':/." .,',.. . '. . ~" .' .... .,:;::.....: .:....:.;:... .::.: '''.'~...:>.;~::'.:''~. ..' :.":.. .'~ . .:..~~..:<':.:;~.~~.:'.".t;::..</::~.;': ::. "::. '.~:;'''':;' . ~....:' B101o~.., , .... . . ',". .........~ ,... . ....,.. ....,.-.. '. ,... . '.' . ..... f. ~. '.' .' ..... ':"<.':'-::;<'.. ...;. ::.--;.'~ .:" ..~....>' .';.~r'.~' :.:':..:':''':'.:~::';'.:'.::':/i:;:'::.:;':>:;.r:.;<. . .......:-:-!_ . ..'.~a. ..... J-..._tl'.uroject 's1~.1n !J1ULlW. o.r.. ~r;~t.J.l.v,.~.tu~a1: st..t~? .: . . '. ......~.: :~:.,; . ~:o.~ :.' ~ ~~,. '~'~'" ~~.EN,-. ~~D~.D : .::":..~'..." r_~::. ~:~~~.:.::.;::: .:'.:::~::~~''''':~.:,'.:'~. .' . ...:..:::,: .: .:....... . b.' :..::lnd1ca~e'..:tYpe~:'si'~e :lri~';'quar;-t1tY 'of tree.f~n.'.~~~',$1~ I'nd "Which . (1'. aF\Y) '.will.be ..emoved by .the. projeet.:,.::'NONE .':. '. '. . "... . '. .: ';':"'~. ,:. .~ . . : ','. . ":. .."-,' ," . '. ..... . ........ . ;.......'.. ........ ','", '" . '. & ... p' . t Ui~."of"'th'" L" ":d >. :.:. :.,.... .::.:~: . ':..;' ~"-~">;..::~'::'~;:~':.:' ~.~.~:::~. <:'::.(<~;." .... ,:/':. '. . .... " :'::..~S.' ...;.i,.:( t.w, .:.::;;, ...:(~~.~". ~~;.~..;::::~~L. .:.(:i. .:;'~" ;..::....: ..,;.~:>..r: ::<:~:': :~fti:h';,:.::i;:::.:' ;:.~::: ..;.:: : .:''.'::,: .,'~ .~'. : Are' :there""&nY':k'nowri hi'storfea' resources' .:toc'lted 'on or near the '. ; .... ~~~~:,:~ :'~ ')"', ~:/:::;:_(;::.':, ::',: ':;,{";:~}i:~;~';:':.: _ .,'. .' 'P' " :.' . '::~.a. 0" ..:.~..'- . .... ." ......~..::;..._,:.......>:~of~...~. ',~"'." ~.'<: ;. ;:~,,:~, ..:...:'t........:.....:~.:.;;.\... .: ...~:..,~~.~~..:-~:.:~.~.~.::.~~I~,.:..~....:..~.l '.: . .:/:.4...., "),:' . " . ....:, . ""~< ...;::.>..~~.~.'::~::~~~i.:..tl\!r.e..~~~n.: .."1':_h..z-~r~.~u~...~~~~r~.~'..~.:,:.:~:i:.~~9.~~A~ot ;or '~~o~e~ on : , .' :""'. .' ..; :,. .... . " ~. o....:ne'r., the. project site!.... Nb :4';,-, -. .w.;. ..,f '7.' ".U ,..... . '. ..... ..'~'. . .~"\"'" :';~;.>...~..::~"';,:':::~e:\.~;;~:~'.::.:.4.:'~~:::' .:.,....~.~:~.~;.~..~:~::..-~~':~..~.:::~...:-:;..'.....;:...,\f,::.,; ...::...~. . ....... . I~' .. . .. . ... .. .::._ ..:".:. . '. ::::~'~!::; :....... -:~~:..,..~ ..~~:~.I-~~. .', .:...:~~.:}'..~...:v;.:,.,.:,;..-...:... ~3 ;:'.r;'~~' ;::":-,,~':;.:~' ~.! ~"5.:.~.: ~.~..:.r-ti,.::.>;;..:/...::..;-..~4..t.~..,;. '.::.,~ :'. ;,.... .::--,.:' " ..~.'. .' , .. ..:..~::......,.,... ........ ........1...... ......:....:.....'....:.:;....:~.~...... ..:~':;-.......: , , '. ~~:\~;:r:~~;~n,~~~'[~'i;X~:E{:;;Y~,,'~',..;..hS,)'~:i<.',?':\~ :{;;,:'. '. ". ,<" ,.' ....:.:....:-...:Qe..e.r'b.~...ill.i.ltrllqturJ~.:.nd .1ai'id ,US~s~.~~r.re.ntl'..e~i.t1ng.on th.e '. '.' ',,::: :.:..'projec;t'.1.~~:...:"'" NONE~.:'~'''' .."i,"::",;,-.: ':~;"::-';:>'.:';'.';:.:'. '., ... . . . .....,: .' ..~..'., _.:'.::~'.::."~ ~~";'.. ..~:.}(.,!; ::..~'.~ ~:r':'":. .:i::..:t..: ..' :''- .: .;: ij :",:' :. .:. .~ ~~.... .. :..:< '.:: ~.::. ~'. -:. .'. .~ 1:,. ~ 'l" ..' ... '. :~;.!..:: ..' ..::".., '.: s." .'t,. " ~.. ".' . :..... . .' ._.4 '..:'..:~ .:~..i~:.'.....::.':i.': ..f''':..........:......_:.. ...:.......... o:.:....:........:_.~.... '.'" .:.:.... ~.~..;:..~....'::... , .... .' . . .)....~:~...:;.;.-..<.:.:: : ~.' :.. . :.''O ..' . " _ ..;/. ~<:.::.~\:s~:/.:: l' '. '. '. . " ..' .. . .' . I .:: .: ;., :~:::: '. '. ., ......~...-~ -'. '. ~ .' . '. . ........ . ..~.:... ::'_,~::,,:.. .r ........ :. . .,1 : . ',0:' '. . .- . . ie...~ ~ . '. H :'~fi.~t;: ..; :..:.~.:~~.~.: ..".......10 . ....,1. ~ . .'. .....~.:~ ~.... ..... ~ '.( ..... '.' .. ....<.:::~. .: ',. . ,.f;':" ~~: . '. ~ ......:..... ..: . ..... . " \ ) ,-./ ,~ ...... ..... , , -, ". -. . ".. .' ," .': '. -, . , .' - ~ . ...,. . . '~ :, .... .. '," ..... . b. '. . ..: .' ,. ............ .~~ .... .' ',.;'.: .~. ';.\:'.; .' . '.. . :'.~- '" '. .' ,..': . Socia' :->(~",,::::...<...::>.~..:..:. ':'::'::'.> .:'. :;"':":;,::.':<~::~.:: -':)/~:/:~.::'::::-':':. .:, .... '~"':;'~'::'" :.~':;\:~:.<'~:\'~:'::'" ....' .;".:-'.:' .~.:.<:;::.~..... :.;;' '. '.' ...;..;"'::.' .::/.(::t>~!:.:<..:.. :.(:' r,;:::L ." . Ar:f~e!,! "rw.:,~'~~.~e~~s\~n:.~..1 ~~ :.......CIf "so~:;~()w.'~~.? t.:; NQ ':.b ~.'. )~,:e::tIi~ri"':'~~','i~~~~~{:em~"'~~~t:'oPP~r~'~_~!!~:e~: :~~':'~'.~7', C. I f. so. " how.any .and 'what type?) ..' ,NO ;' '.'. .. :'. .."', '.. ,. .:. ':.:'. ,'; '. , ease . 'rovi d~.'1 :;::"'C)'t~'e/'1~'~~,~~~~~'~'ri'~hfC'h' ~~'~"d': e~<~:d1"te'~ttl~"~'~~"U~~1 on "~f. propose pro ec ..' _ .. 7. '. -. ':'.1,' , '.. .' .... . .... .' ~ . ..........,. . '. . , :. . . ." .. ~!:' '..'" . ::.,. . ::':~.. " ..' .... . . -' . I. - . ......~.. . . .. . ,.' :'__ .../_:.:~_'.;;;_.~,.~,;,.:..~-...;";'...::':;,.r.".,:.:.';'.':.:..~.'~.~."':,~,",~',~,":.":':.'._~;_.;..~'~.'.":"'..:."~.'.':'.:_:": :.:=::, .:~.',.:'..:',< ,::'~. ~- ,. . _.~ ' . , ..' -. . . ...:2;/:,~ii::~:. .>. . .... ...... .:.;:' : '-:~.: . . .'.." -. -.:":'";',:..' ': ":':.~ ~ '. .=.-. ..... .. .., ..........;--;.. ~. ..' . .... -. .... .~ - ~ . ." '. " .' :.... .... . '. ,~ - ..'.... ."."-: ,: ~ .~. . ',. ....-. .... . .-:."~' .' ..... ... .... "'--:' .,: <;"'}';t;J,~~11~g.%;irDt,' . ..' ... -. .::,.'t. ....' .... '" t . ~ ....~., . ,: . :.,'.. '. . ;". '. ':'~.' .' :j':.\'" ',::~:,,:":~~...: . ~.. .' .~ . .: '.,: " . -, ..'..:.. ' . . " '. '. ... .:'..Jo..~ " ., .' '. . .; '. .': ..' ". . '. '.. ". .,. .... . ;..,..:: '. . :"~'..... .... "!,, .'~ '\.:':' . I . . .~ ... , . ." .... "!'-";'l. ", ',.. ...... " ,.... . :' : . . ~ ;!. ., .-. . # '.... ,!','/ .' ;'. .; . * ',. '. .. ...... ...:. .. -...~ ..' .- . . .' ........ ':,:~::-::-.' . .'.. ..... ...<-. .' ". . .; . '.~. . :..:.... " I' .'. . '.:."1. .,: ..... .; ....~..,. . . ~:~:,>./",:~ . .'. ',; :'. :.~ ..... .. . \':\\-'~.\~. . .:'{~:~[:~.;. '. , ~..:. : .' :.:~..: .... .'.. I. ... J-.~~~~~':':: . '. ..... .~~~' ..l_......., . ~..', '.:~~~'. . '.. .'..,..:.... ... ~ ;"~':., '. .':, ..., '. .... .-.:~ ",. :.. '. ~ " .. .'. ~..~, ~;.:....~: . ~ ~~. .. " ." , ..' . ~ , ....... . . .... ..... ( - 7 - E. CERTIFICATION" . ~",",-:'.'. . '::. '..~:'\",':: . " ,:..'.... " . .. . . . . '. .. . . . . .~. .... .. ~ . '. . . . . . .'... . . :. . . .... .', ~. . .............:......:........-..-.... . .' '..-" ..,' ~.,,;'- ~. -..' . "'. , '. .: I. .... - . ~(t~~~k.~Ii+~n:.;. Vice Pres. .DLTON TinE"CORPORATION .'or'. , owner/~wner ~.n ~~cr~w*'.' ..' . . .' .~ '.. 4 j '. .. . .,. ~ -. '". I . " . . - . . ; . ...... ,'. .' .... . . .':,. ._' ", :..;'" .~. <,:: I . . . . .' . ~ ~ :. :-. .' . . . . ..-t, ':. .... . . ..... . .... , . , .' '-" ,.:.... .' .' . . . ....' :. or '. l;onSUl tint Qr Agent~ ..' .' . , ','. ,,' -~ '; -.., .: ", ': . . . .' . . '. ,"f' -. '.- ....:.... ..-....:.:.::.:;,:::.':.{.:.<...:...;'.. ';.:,~.,:" ,,;. ','::; :;'::";:'.";.' .' :..\:':, .~.,',." ,', HEREBY AFFIRM, that to', the' be'sf :of rI.Y' bel tef, the' 'Itatementll~d"1nforin&tion herein contained Ire in Ill' ~spects. true and . correct 'and ~h~t' 11,. known . fn'onnatfon concernins. the."projeet and i.~s..etttn'9 have'bee.n included in "arts ,a. C .nd.D of this .ppl.1c~tion..fol"'lnIn1t1al Study' of~ss1ble . environmental impact and.~ enclosures'or attachments thereto. " .... .' ,. . '. '.'. '., '. '. : ..... ~ , , .. t ~ . DATE:. ~ /J7'.:,::.: >::".; . .: ..;.....;:;.i., *1' Icting for I cOrPorit1on,,'1~lude ciplc1ty Ind ,ComPllnY :na~. ' '. . - '" . . . '.: .... . '.' '. ~ . , . . . ' .. . . -.. . . ~ '.~.. .." .,~ .' . . ' . .. :""', " . . ....-. ....:. . . """ " ," (" \ \. I -.... ,- ) ,..... .. - 8 - Case No. ~.5-P.t!J-~ CITY DATA . F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Current Zoning on site: North South . East ) Is the p'rniect COJllpatible with tbe General {>>l an Land"Use DDJ:gram? ,fin "n..ueJt.V" ON" (.\."'^ t.M. -r\MtN..," 1<1 1'L G e.v....,....' \1'\&.1..1.I\ c.."'\M~ t'L ~ \J ~c. }l" --. ~~~ 'iV\e:~..(!i~. "\i~ ~...~lW'.l t... "('-v1: I ~Uu.A. ..LH,u' ~~. \ .... t4'"~eoJC - , Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so desi gnated? n () . l "'H" sf Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ~~ ~l.PI~ ~J. (If yes, describe the design techniques being use4 ~pro ect or e ance the scenic quality of Chula Vista.) ~ee, a.tP-cJt..ecl. . . How many acres of developed parkland are within the Park Service District of this project as shown in the Parks and Recreation Element of the General Plan? /.'1 What is the current park acreage requirements 1n the Park Service District? . ~~ t6' How many acres of -parkl and are necessary to serve the proposed project? (2AC/l000 pop.) q. s. . Does the project site provide access to or have the potential to provide access to any mineral resource? (If so, describe in detail.) tlD ( . ( t - 9 - 3. Schools If the proposed project is residential. please complete the following: School Current Attendance Current Capacity Students Generated From Project . Elementary Jr. Hi gh Sr. High 4. Aesthetics Does the project contain features which could be construed to be at a variance from nearby features due to bulk. form. texture or color? (If so. please describe.) 5. Energy Consumption Provide the estimated consumption by the proposed project of the following sources: . ,. ~'^/~.ft./Wto. Electricity (per year) Natural Gas (per year) Wa ter (per day) 6. Remarks: ~~ (l.VN1jr<- . rec 0 0 anm ng or epresentatl ve .j'lq~'11 Date J 't- =.- -~'" -'.., -. --- - " 00 . '6 ,""-" ..j~. . I -~ "_,.r' ""-S. - , '(S-~.1 - 10 - Case No. ,$5 qO...f G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1. Drainage d. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? 1J~,,~- S~/t!Jw -/.te,1AN1rDt~ . b-/;fA'f /...I:=~~ Itc!)"~.. i - - - . . e. . Are they adequate to serve the project? y-es f. What is the location and descripti~n of existing off-site . drainage facilities? ~i-r~~~;~~ i!f/~^Br 01:1."( ~I!.~~ ~J"i,J ~w....~J 4L.. ~~.v . .. g. Are they adequate to serve :the project? yes 2. Transportation ,) , a. What roads provide primar.y access to the project? t:rbl11 LA/::.~ s. P::J 4. ~ , E.. "H ,.. -6 t: b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? ....,,; ~ .. " "'6 -& 0 l. !. rf1c~1 '::: 3-('1 -4(f t. \..;.:, ~ .'.!C~ .o.,d~J~ j ~ :~\s)N ~- \4 \ \ . ~; ~:~ . . \ . i~ : . do' ~-- ( : . 1 ; 1 I , ! r . , {.,. /~'\ . e. , a. Is the project site within a flood plain? YD - b. Will the proj~ct be SUbject-to a~ existing flooding ~azards? ~ . " . -.' . . Will the project create any:f1ooding hazards? c. c. What is the ADT and es~mated.le.lel of service be~o and after project completion? 7J:>1'5.1/tJ;:,cr /('I~V;I'~ ~ 7~ (-,I I~c'- .. ' . 4fvltLbad"/)9t.ft'*fJ;~ fJl'!S.Q.;l~/i#j . . _ Before 'T~"(" ~:;j'I""ht: .. ,. ~fter ~p nPf . A.D.T. ~ ~~ ~b~~ L.D.S. . ~:=- · . .JtfJ Are the primary access roads adequate to If not. explain briefly. d. "'fP-~ Will it be necessary that additional dedication. widening and/or improvement be made to existing streets? ~~~ If so. specify the general nature of the neces ary actions. f!)L R.. - ~ A,6..-..~ ~ ~ ...,;/I:J.. rJd'" J_ .lAp:. ~~- ~ ':-.1 ~3t~~~~l~lE ,f ~~ J.A.". '- ..I"J::t,,~ .A,....&,c. · . . , .-,fI." ...." .. > ~ ., , I .,~ .... (" (, . ") - , ~ - 11 - (" Case tlo. :z: S qO"I~ 3. Geolo'gy a. Is the project site subject' to: Known or suspected fault hazards? Li quefacti on1, Landslide or slippage? b. Is an engineering geology report necessary to evaluate the project? ~D a 4. 50i 1 s a. Are there any anticipated adverse soil conditions on the project site? )/0+ ~I'\D~#'\. - AI/'J ~~15 re~l-T ~w..~i:f-~t'! f If yes, what are these adverse soil conditions? 1I1'Al . b. ( c. Is a soils report necessary? 5. Land Form a. What;s the average natural slope of the site? '1-e.:5 b. What;s the maximum natural slope of the site? . '--6-~-.' Noise Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the appl i cant? N ~. . 1=/a + 1=( ~-t ~' . . , . .. . . .... .~,' 4' ~ ~ ., .... , , ( ( .- <. I ( ( - 12 - Case No. ~ 7. Air Quality If there is any direct or indirect automobile usage associated with this project. complete the following: Total Vehicle Trips Emission Grams of (per day) Factor Pollution CO 6600 X 118.3 II: 7fP,7tO Hydrocarbons 66()C> X 18.3 . ,'U>, 780 tJOx (N02) 6600 X 20.0 . '~Z.IDOO Particulates 6600 1- 1.5 II: " ,6100 Sul fur 6600 X .78 . 6,1't~ 8. Waste Generation '. 9. How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? Solid . 1'16 'YJo.f Liquid '1,2--00 6A'/Jat \~at is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or adjacent . to th~ site: JJ~~:..: :~;r-: 1 s t: ~:~:~~, c.tewer "~e .'." :fI...~ IMIt\.~..lul.4-tl!. ,_~ .k'~_ _~ :+_ __.:___~ Are they adequate to serve the prop~sed project? )(~ Public Facilities/Resources Impact ........:,.-. . If the project could exceed the threshold of having any possible significant impact on the environment. please identify the public facilities/resources and/or hazards and describe the adverse impact. (Include any potential to attain and/or exceed the capacity of any public street. sewer. culvert. etc. serving the project area.) Remarks/necessary mitigation measures "- $ ~ A~ ~~--1t'~ ..J::t . . ".-.....J. 7L. 4...~-L~ ~A_~' - ~ . . I, I .. ~ ~~:. ~~./~,.;~~ ~i ,.L.$~"t'~ I" .~ 2L. CltY~ Dat/q.1/.,..,.. \~ t... 1 ) - 13 - Case No. /J- 9~-L-r H. FIRE. DEPARTMENT 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station and what is the Fire Department's estimated reaction time? 1/4 mile, less than two minutes. 2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for tPe propose~ facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? yes, 3. an automatlc lre -riFe A~'Qr9R+" !II"" ,.,.t:pl;,....d-:-~ e.~ Fire Mars a )(agcS -" { } :':: I "' -13(a)- Case No. /.f-'~-/..::J H-l. PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? ~ Neighborhood Community parks J(~ IV 2. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate to serve the population increase? Neighborhood ~ Community parks Does this project exceed the Parks and Recreation Thresholds established by City Council policies? ~/A 3. ~J...aJ l.~ J.o/...&.o Parks and Recreation Director or Representative 4//lJp;1 . Date . . J l'- DATE: April 9, 1991 ROUTING FORM ..I . ~ ) ...- " ~n Larson, Building & Housing ~ohn Lippitt, Engineering' IEIR onlYl tliff Swanson, Engineering EIR only Hal Rosenberg, Engineering EIR only Roger Daoust, Engineering 15/3, EIR/2) . Ruth Fritsch, Deputy City Attorney (EIR only) Carol Gove, Fire Department Shauna Stokes, Parks & Recreation . Keith Hawkins. Police Department . Current Planning . Advance Planning .. . 'ob Sennett. City Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Yista Elementary School District. Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union H.S. District. Tom Silva (IS & EIR) Other' "0 TO: . FROh: SUBJECT: Rick CarDenter Environmental Section In] D CJ D Application for Initial Study (15-90-13 Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR- Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- Review of Environmental Review Record IFA- 443 IfB- IFB- FC- to be lOP assign,d IDP ) lOP ) /ERR- ) e. The project consists of: Consideration of an amendment to the Chula Yista General Plan, changing the land use designation for 3.67 acres from -Medium Density Residential" to aRetail Commercial. and a change 1n zoning from R-l (Single Family Residential) to C-C (Central Commercial). The proposed development will include five buildings consisting of I bank, In ATM structure. a fast food restaurant, I family-style restaurant Ind various small comnerctal shops totalling 33,461 sq. .ft. of Type V-N (wood frame stucco) structutes. . Location: Southeast corner of Otay Lakes Road Ind East aHa Street Please revie.w the document Ind forward to lie any conments you flave '1. 4/1t91 tonInents: . A'7~ Ar e'~AI,v'A -: p",~"p7d ~ /lNSS~AU' OAA/t$e7Z~V$' e:::-A/O~T,,~A/ ,....~ ,"A,~/e . Ar ~A/rlA'I!I,e;pjfJA./ ,trleAlV414" ~ '/III~J("~/7Y' '_ ., ""e'5e com mel'l+S reF e r (;:..0 '?O ~o,.It./,,~. <;zS( 0.... prior ~;t::.e. plo....n. -r\-1e. c;...v....rre..Ci t. ~ i te P\o..r1 doe~ rc -1'.6 ~__ ,\\u...~t:;rO-t;:.~ t-\-1e .~~ _._ ~ ......... , .. ROUTING FORM .( J 6. .--.. DATE: -April 9, 1991 TO: C/f~n Larson, Building . Housing John Lippitt, Engineering IEIR On1Yj ~ t . Cliff Swanson, Engineering EIR only P- . Hal Rosenber~, Engineering EIR only ... - Roger Daoust, Engineering IS/3, EIR/2) Ruth Fritsch, Deputy City Attorney (EIR only) Carol Gove, Fire Department Shauna Stokes, Parks I Recreation Keith Hawkins, Police Department Curr~n~.PJlnnjng ~vance.flannina ~ob-senriiti~--City Landscape Architect Bob leiter, Planning Director : Chula Vista Elementary School District," kate Shurson Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR) ~~d~' ~ Rick C.ro~ntet Environmental Section IKKJ Application for Initial.Study (IS-90-13 IFA: 443 I::l Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days){EIR- IFB- .CJ Review of a Draft EIR 10 (EIR- IFB- r::] Review of Environmental Review Record FC- - to be IDP assign,d IDP ) lOP ) IERR- ) eo The project consists of: Consideration of an amendment to the Chula Vista General Plan, changing the land use designation for 3.67 acres from -Medium Density ResidentialU to -Retail Commercial. and a chan9! in. zoning from R-l (Single Family Residential) to C-C (Central Commercial). The proposed development will include five buildings consisting of a bank, an ATM structure, a fast food restaurant, a family-style restaurant and various small commercial shops totalling 33,461 sq. .ft. of Type V-N (wood frame stucco) structures. . Location: Southeast corner of Otay lakes Road and East -H" Street Please review the -document and forward to me any connents you have '1. 4/1t9l. Coaments: GII4 ~r,,~ "-to~/I(~~ ~I"~ tI~I';w,d/ t', ~J/~~s.~fNtr~;' ~ax~~I,. . ~ p/a-nm;Y w,~ ~~ k ~?I1Y"~ ~ ~ ~ WII! ~'lt~vt /k.;y'oH- /l1~~ ~ ~t%~ ___. /'l~al'h/ ~~ ~CL~/~;f~H ~"t~~ eQi~ u';"":; Aealr tUc. ~.~~~ a."f'. AUr'c- /';.fl.://r '1.4'- A~M /'~~~f'..t ~,,~ /bz:L.~ 'J~~r ~ ;;;;;:D . ( (.! ) Sweetwater Union High School District ADMINISTRATION CENTER 1130 trlFTH AVENUE CHULA VISTA. CAUFORNIA .20n Cll.) "1-5553 ~NNING ~ARTMEN'I' April 23.1991 RECEIVED : ~~ 26J99/ PLANNING Mr. Rick Carpenter City of Chu1a Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. CA 91911 Dear Mr. Carpenter: Re: 15-90-13 - Rezone of 3.67 Acres From -Median Density Residential. to -Retail Community. Please be advised that the above subject development proposal is located across from the Bon1 ta Vista High Schoo 1. Approx1 mate ly 2.000 students attend this campus daily. many of whom walk to schoo 1. I t has been my experience that sma 11 Shopping centers such as the one described in this proposal contain shops that are attractive to teenagers. I am concerned for their safety. As we have seen along Otay Lakes Road in front of the Point Bonita Center. students will cross a busy street to access the shopping center. The same thing can be expected to occur at this new center. Therefore. I am requesting that the city require. as a conditiort of approval. that a solid barrier be placed in the -H" Street med i an str1 p. Th 1 s will discourage 11 lega 1 pedestri an crossing. As we have learned from the Otay Lakes Road experience. landscaping alone does not discourage jaywalking. . Thank you for the opportunity to comment.on this issue. &1 erely. ~ homas Silva Director of Planning TS/sf ,.~- I CHULA V~A ELEMENTARY SCHr"lL DISTRICT \. t ,! 84 EAST "T STREET · CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 · 619425.9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WOR' H RECEIVED ril 19, 1991 :::'R 221991 . Maryann Miller PLANNING IOARD OF EDUCAlIOH Ap JOSEPH D. ClIoNNGS, Ph.D. LARRY~"GHAM SHARON GLES PATRICK A..lIDO GREGR.SANDOVAL tuPERlNTEHDEHT D4N F. VUGAN, Ph.D. Ms Environmental Review Section City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Case Ho. 18-90-13 / FA-443 Project: otay Lakes Plaza Applicant: Mark Kelton Location: otay Lakes Road , BastH str.et Dear Ms. Miller: Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the otay Lakes Plaza project. This project, located at the Southeast corner of otay Lakes Road and East H Street, is within the Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from Kindergarten through Grade 6. District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 4 - 5 percent over the past several years, and this is projected' to continue. Permanent.capacity has been exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District also buses students outside their attendance areas, both to accommodate growth a~d assist in aChieving ethnic balance. The Initial Study prepared for the proposed project does not identify potential significant impacts on schools. The relationship between non-residential development and student enrollment has bee~ clearly recognized by the State Legislature through authorization of collection of school fees. A joint study sponsored by five South Bay school districts, prepared in ~9.90. by SourcePoint, further documents and demonstrates this relationship. Based on this study, the proposed 33,461 square feet of commercial space will generate approximately 13 new elementary age children. Per student facility costs to the'District are esti.ated at $8,814, or $114,582 for this project. These costs far exceed developer fees currently allowed under state law. State law currently provides for a developer fee of $ .26 for non-residential area to be charged (Chula Vista Elementary School District - $' .12/square foot: Sweetwater Union High School District - $ .14/square foot) to assist in finan~ing facilities needed to serve growth. . , <&>I (J Q .. . ~ I April 19, 1991 Ms. Maryann Miller Page 2 BE: otay Lakes Plaza I IS-90-13 Given this shortfall, ~he District encourages developer participation in alternative financing .echanisms ~o help assure that facilities will be available to serve children generated by new construction. We are currently utilizing Community Facilities Districts (CFD's) as one method to help fund this deficit. Participation in a CFD is in lieu of developer fees. The subject project, otay Lakes Plaza, is located in the Tiffany School attendance area. This school is presently operating over permanentcapacitI' and an alternative financing .echanism, such as partie pation in or annexation to a Community Facilities District is recommended. If you have any questions, please contact this office.. Sincerely, t'irJ:c-~ Kate Shurson ~ Director of Planning ~ J(S : dp cc: Rick Carpenter Mark Kelton . . '. II :i - .. 1& ! El ; '. r ~ f 0 , " o' f: . .. .. " !i . o. !.. .. . ,', ~ :. I '0 . , . ~ , , . c. ..--.------_.... . . . o . tit Ii t - ;twO ra~ I~ ! Ii .i ~ . w ~ Z .- i = '" ~\ ~ ," ~ ~\ '" , " \1'''' I I I . I ., t .. b : :c - J - .. .. 0 ~ 8- I: I 0 .. - 0 .. " Dl b t I - :; .. .. I: .. I: .. ... ~ - 8- 0 ... .. 1:.. ... - I: 0.. . lI' - -., .. tit .. .. f ., .... I: I' ta .. " .. .. ..." - " I/: ... _e ... ., ".. ":II - ... ., ..e I: e .. .. Dl II 1:'" - A .. tit ~." ". ., -0 .. ~ ...e .... ., _:II -a I/: ..e co .. ." 01_ 0 - - '" - ... :II '" '" ~ 0 ... ... w co co e . ~ I " I I .... - . .. . \. \, \ .. il ~ ~~\' 0 ... ;i ~ - , . I ., ... ... :z 0 w A ... e 0 ~'. . 0.- g= ~H I I I I -u .... :... - .. I/: .... -- :;0 I: " .. . -... -.. I: . " 1/:., .e ..'" - JI- .. .. ..c ~ ., - .A ..., ..." "'- I - ...- 0- 't~ c -" .,.. - .. - 01 _0 -- t e- ..- I... . - ,0 .. .... '" .tIt ., .. oc ... .. .. .... _ Ol t1 -.., 0 .~~ ..- c '" ..- .... l' .. c- oo 0 ..., ..... ... _:II C 0- ." .. .. ".I: - "t! b 01 "'.. .. !:I OO~ cu ... c- eo .. I -- .. . ee 0 .. -.I: .. ag .. 0 . 0_ tit .. I: ..... ..., I: .. ., .. - - ... g. ..~ - - 0" .,- ~~ - 1/:... e co e .. .... I .. 1:'1 0 ee _:I .. ~ .. 0 .. - .. .,.. - ., ... ..., .A~ - ..... 0. v- .,.1: 0 ~., '.. :1.1: II ., .. .. :II 0'- t- .,- ... "'.. "1 .... ... - " .. . t ..- .. .. .. t .oo - ... 0 e .,a I.. ... _u ... ... _II .,., ., ..- .. I .. ..., A- - ., .. -" _0 - .. ..CO "10 -... - ~.: .. ... u "0 1= 0... .... ~ ",e .. :II ~~ .... ., "'- 0" ~ -- "e .,.. . 1 - ... IiZ .. ..0 .. '" .. U .I: ... 0 ..., 0.. ..... ., c... e ~.. u ., u c .. ..ClIl C ... .. e~ 0. .. .. ... e- O'a~ 0 .. ... . ... ee v- Ol/: 0'" U'" " - ... c ! _0 - ..- - .. .. ! ..- -. A.A ..C 0. .u " ...u t~ .,.. - ... .. '001 ..... - '" -- I/: A _e - ..-; ...., cco :II co ... co C .. -- ."... '" Ol .. .1:... ... &..., '" _ co coo "'0 "," .- 0_ - -... - S .... 0 .. to :II - ec -- 00 ..., B tIle ... u ..- ..~ g ..to "'0 ...U .- .., tit to_ - .I: &I ... 0" vtu e co w'" Q" w e.. e " - .. ._ to ~ -&- u il c :II ~ . . e . . . to ~ U .. .. ~ -" -".._.~-_._~.,--~- . . it ;;l - IE w ... 2 \1 EI .. ;~ -= t= ..t: ~t. :; ~.! t'i i:v..~~ ..... ..~ 0 :;..~... c:.......c: ~c__:s. ., ~ ..~ ~ _v_ O~_ .. oa~t ~~~o "t':;:~ i: ., "0 ., .. ~ClII _ - e v... 'V"~"O 'Voo. ..e .... i: ., ~.&: 1:. ~ ..v etA;:~ A~ .... 8 . _0 ... ~.I..':.e ..-...- 'Vve.. _ ,;~.:;5~ 0................. .....o..c:aa ! . . o - "- ~ \I. (.. I So I. 0.; _ ~i:. -- . v...... -... .. - ..~v Ii . 'V v, ..&:~ K~II lil ..... I:"~ _~o ....'Z i::~ ~eo& : o.~ 5 t -~ !! .2",: ;; ..- : -I. --.. _ e. :a... . .II , I .. - -- -- ----- '\\ \ "sl ~I ./ ~ ~)~~~I I. I I I ~IIIIIIIII I - . ~ B - a . ...v 0- ~... 10. -::~ "_:I :.&:: . .. ..v.. -- -~- 10. ..u ...- _0. c-e~ _"0 .. A" o;..J .. -- fO. cO. _O~ ._0 ii-a e.._ 0."'0 ..a~ .&: 0 ..!!: _:s.&: =~t :a 0" . . . - - - . v ... - .. r."v EO. AVAa' .'t 0 "'O~ ~..O ... ~- . ._!; c 0." :.~ .3:: '" . '" . .. .. 0. _i:= ....~ ..-- ,.,. V.D - A"_ .,. !l5~ :s.".. .,0 - ... ::...: :a 0.. .; .D . '" :.. .:1 v. - oc ..:a -.. ..u - ., .. - 1:_ :t- &~ :a Jl.i .&:::11 .u- .-. .Ii. - -.. _ ClII~ ,'" 5B .c_. v::ll v A... !!~O ..."V '" .I'''C I~ Q .. . U I 1'.1 -.. .. .-c -- =5 ... v.. 1:. .. '" ... .:1. f~f _f- .v.. ....v &"'. 0~1 "0_ A "'- .::11. .cO_ ..- .. ClIII: -- ., --.. ;e& . '" . I . ~ . ..- .... .- . .... :1 ::3 - i!" K... ." _0 ~= ~ c. !I V_ ... II' E'i A_ - .0 fi- . . '" ..c =- -.. 'V e . . -' . . N - ~.. 11111111111 I - .. .. . Cs I: E t~ o I.=! .I. ~'U --.. v lilt. :::S:o. 'I:: V~ =-_ V.. I: .. lilt "'_ V :1_ .,- . .. 1_ ~ue"'''M1.a1I1:'' _ 11:..., e::ll_ "t-_.A '=:U.x~:i:::O~"'~ I ...... ... I .' . \ 'i I\JJ-)I I I I II ':J - E 2 =1 . c o - .. I. - e o u to . '" - . I I ~ o .. e .. - .. v '" - . ... - ... e I o - ... . .~ '5 ";~ ..... ..e .... - ..... :ao .. e - .. - . - f ~i . . .. &1 \1 ;i i 1 2 ~l I ! ~ '5,.. ..e !~ .. -- .... II K-a- .. -.. ~ ..- ~= i __ A :i :;I~ ..I .. 0 - '" .J '" . '" - .. ~.: . ~ I .. e - .. .. ... lie . I 'I I e - . - .. t... ~'" _f' ..I e.. .. V'" _0 ... -- e.. ~~ "'. o C.. \\~ 'I ~ .. '5 o ~ o = J i .. - ~ I! ~~ .e:: .. ~l; "1 e_ -- ...e - .. WI~ t.. ..! ~- 11 0.. - .... .. I: e. - .... .. .. - ,,- - -.. - . , .. o~ =- '" 0 IIIII I111I .. - . .... -II 1!- ;.:;: ..& '" ..- -.. - .. "''0 ~= 0:;.. "0 0 ..- .... e.. "".. ~~ ~:: oc o. ~I~~'O I ~!i ~u:a"'''' . .. - )) ~., 'i._ . . I, I '" ~I I . . - . V - ... -- : .. ",t' =J ..'" -- .. I/: e ..~ ..0 .. t~ ..t '0" _OIl i", ve ..... . ... ... 1/:0_ .. . -. u.... _a>_ .... ...- . .. - a;....A '" .."'.. .. -.. ~ ~t: ..'" B .-'" - .. .. .. .... . t~= _ !~ I ; eSo;; ~ C_.A . . I .. .. . _e ... -0 .... It .. ..- I; .. ... ee -. ..~ 11 fe ..t ~a!: 1! AO JI ..- ,,;: -- DO 0.. "'" I ." - . . ~ I . . t .. .. I '" S ... . t: ~~ _D ..0 ... WI ct . ... - t' .. ... 0... I'E - .. .. N .!.2 "'5 I' )0;; _ ..~ .. ~ e e _ .. ... .. IIC ...: ... _.. .. e a~ .. = - t" .. t ..& t ~:s ~ ii '1/: t'E .: i .. 0" .. 0 : .r i .t .! :11:"& .. e ".. WI " :t ..... c ... 5 8: : i :II: "'I/: ~ .., :. e .. I/: V .. e .. V -.. ... WI i:f DIll -.. .... . co -2 \1\\ ~\~ \ ..~ '\~~I . . " '."1 I 1111 I . ..'" ... .. '''i: .:-~ I .. '" - u-I' ~!- !.e= ... .. :: ':E ":So ... :1'0& .. _u... Eli: v.~ .... "O!'5 1::-- - .... .. "'." .c ~ ,,- "'.. . WI.." a;.OIC 2'1_= a-,... .. e - I . .. '" - . .. I/: '" - - I; I - . ~.. .. c _ .. ~:= I .. f f t~ - ..' ..-... i: . ... 't ; t --e 00 e-=. e,: 1:_. A o o~ J i~ ;!i; Hi! il : I .. c ... . i , .. :s .= I " - .. c t~ - -- .. 0- ..'" C) I" X~ ." ~t !i . ... - i .. , b - .. I I' - .. I 1 - ~I ~ .. ., ...... .. 'I) I.. ; ... .. .. ~ tl! __ r .. lie .. C. .. :.. : ..~ ... I:: ~ . !. .. .j u f ,2-:' "'t .. .. III ~~ ... _c &- ., - c~ . ! :: "O:=~ - ..., bRe _lio -" -.... t,i !;~ eo ~ob .iil ....'" ~::.! ft.. O&~ ~ t... ....t ill ",.- I - .. ; - ~ .. .... ..:: ..~ ct -: .. ..I' -- fl - ..- ~.e f.J ... I'; "t .-- !,; . .. . . . ... - I III .... ... -- .. .. -- -- -- xx ...... -i~" -" I -.; .... c_ .. -!i t';l' ",.. ~.'; , f · ~~ e.....~ ...- &- .~8'=~ 6...~...... ~~:;c~~ . co - I ( '- I i '-- .. . ~) f ,. -.J . c: "'~ GI 0'" -" +'''::0 +' _C: :s " till...... . till .....:: GI ...... 411 ..:: c: "::U"'4U'" ... Il:ll:." ,,~ +' C:" 0 +'411 ~- C:O 0411_ ..C: till c.... ..:::S " ,,+' ""_411'. U""'eI o +' CJ" C:+'~o. C:4U > -c::c- +' 411 _UtaO - +'eI. .. +' !~ ... 411 f " ... +' U":: . - ...- .. eI e:4U . ~ e:Ue: t'~tIt >'''0 >tta..4Uc.!0 C<_ ...- +' 411.." +'U..><.. 'Mitlt tit - e: --4110.... tit C. - ~+'~eI ~.. ~u >-t -- 4Ue:0 \1"- o e:~ O-.........+' eI ..:: ~-- ..:: '" CU c: .ce:e: c- ....+' +'411 ...U~O +' C." ~ 411< e:_~ . :s_4U_ :s-U4U.....0 >....e: :s ~ .....::+' . tIt_~>..:: ta :z- 41111>>"0 - . ..- - +' .c ~ "0 ~4U4U - Ce:tIt~ C._~...:s ~+' . 411 e: C_ 411 e: e:Ut5. ~:z4U - tit IV) +" -- " -4Uenll>> 10- _411_ '" ~ tltZ_ ~>_4U""'C ClI: .. -u_ Q . 0 II>> I "'tIt"Ze: -- .e: E .- e: .c _ +'>+' tIlIe: ....0 ."'Q~ uze: e:UO c: 4U~ U c:"O ..........'" 411.....411 0-_ 0> 0-4UClI:....E ..., " -..+' -.< ~ -:s~=< Oe:_ "'-tIlI tit ..::.... 0 tit 0 ." (!J e: ~. tIlIe:! - U.. - U+'<_'O- Co tit !~O .. ~......... U 0........._ "411 ~ iQ >t 4U+"e::E-'" "e::s 011>>.. " +' " u 2:- 411"'11>> .. e: :s .....- 411_ Z U . tit tit e:__ . +' GI c> ~ 411 ...,_ 0 eI 411 e: o -_ - till e: tit ..:: .... - 0 .ce-- "0 c.+, +'-0 +' =... ..:: ... ....." - 0e:4U ~ e: el_ I ... O<+" 0. < e: 4U+' ~GI":: 411 GI U +" . +' U (!:I :s +' f (!J ...:: g, Co!+' .ce-", N - . ...... ." - "'0 ... e:e: N +' ..:: +':Z ..:: 411 GI.... +' " Gl04U ~O.c_ I - ... U C. ... tit..:: _ U 0 eI ..:: ~ +' :~~! c: 4U.e: 0+"Z4U+' +'_tIlI - " ..., - " 0. ..., "0 >:s >+'411 GlO"O~ 4110 -4U0"OC +'e:_ +'C +' tit " ~ C ca "~+,.c~4IIeI .4IIeI .4IIGl4II - C 0.. E e: 0. e:... 0. "0 .c > .c ..:: "0 '5 IGlI4U4U~S +' GI GI ... ~ +" 1"0 -e: ;&: "O~"O~ 4U+' 0 ..:: e: tIt.c f- "+'0 ... OIl>>C_ +'o:s+, ... C +' e: e:ca 0 f04U1I>> ~ ~tIlI Ota :Sc :S4Uca Z C,!_ "::-UO"~ o 0"0 OC 0 C tit o U ~C>4U+' 411 ... 411 ..-+'+' - ';t. ~ e 411 :s e: ~ ~"O +'~ "'!~~ !c tit 0. "0 '" 0 411 c~_ tit u- tili - - _..:: 4U.....f'" -4U:S _411...,0 Z ~ 4II>GI +'4U"'Q C .. CJ" ... 0_ - +,..::e:..:: +'_..::taQ4U0 +'''f +'4U~" :IF; GI -r~~I."UC"U - 411 - "0 c;a. 0. c::c '5 ~ I . ..... c: c 0 8\ \D . - M 0 U C. :I: .. H (-)- ATTACHMENT: SCENIC ROUTES ,'- \ . . . .-' . East H Street: The alignment of East H Street provides views of Mother Miguel Mountain and San Miguel Mountain. East H Street a1 so traverses a variety of topographic features including the westerly end of Rice Canyon and the rolling hills near Southwestern College and Eastlake. Otav lakes Road: Otay lakes Road offers panoramic views of the hills and mountains to the east, the Sweetwater Valley to the north and downtown San Diego to the northwest. The treatment of these roadways should be consistent with maintaining the current scenic quality and maximizing the future scenic highway potential of these routes. It is, therefore, an important consideration to maintain a consistent quality of development and landscaping along the routes. As such, these issues will be addressed throughout the planning and permitting process. WPC 8900P ,.~-- I . , . __ ~ ~~~ ~,-: n-(j'c:: '~') .~ , ,A ~'J'\ \ ). @ \l ~ ~ . SF ~~......... P ~ \~ ~ ~...J~ @fF.~ ,~~ , ,,, :\ --= 11~'..x~ \/ ~~~~...~~~ /~:: J;- \ ~ ,,} ~~ -- ~~~--- r-- ~ ~~ ""-.. . / ~__ ~~~ . :i;:;:" ~/ ~ r -'v~ ~. kJ1 ~/ l.... 'l".l-~~ _ BA ~, ,,\~~.. ~ J1 ~OFF;C;'} ~~ .O'''~'' ~ ~~\ ~ \ ~~ ~ '. T~p~\~ ~ ~ ~~~ M~ ~ 'VAC ~<.-, RETA~""" ~ ..\( ~ ~:......:~.,~...""~ " J ~'~ - .........11~~........."=".;-~.1-... . ~ ~ \ - ~. ~t~ !,~..::~,,~~..~~- ~~ "" ~ CH' - - ';;~/( ~rri"'t" -l'.,~':.~~,_:!,;::::~"Z.J...~...~ CCP E....S1 1 URCH ...- )::i~r;t"... ~:.~; p"C"'\.' '}j"1t.'-':~ --, ~ ---~ 1 ;t"..',t!.. ~2' . . .:.C....~..~~... -- 0 ,""Kr ":- ~......., . ..-~':,,-\ " .., VAC ~ " ~ t I '~"'..~"" ," ...;.~ :."'~'..':- ~( . \ r- ~~N~\ ,s.;"q, r ,~~":-""'''''''''_'''''''''''':-; ~ (. /' "'1'\ ~ .....;.r.t1'..d.Cj,1 :"\ ~\U c:....':?" ~E'''''' 11 Y ~--:.':.'\ \ "\>?f"~;e~ SF' D-:::::? :;:;\ ~~7' , SUBJECT SITE of" ';".~ ' :~ T.~I .L '. CO~DOS f,"/' -:.~. 'tf() .~ . YA, ~ I,:Y' Jrc;s.' I .. '\, '~ ~"'{" ~/:j y\~ tA"~ ~ .' ,- I*~ 'it-T ~ ~~{~ - ~<?~, ~ e*dN ~. ~t."t ....~ 8 ! (Q . ~ ~O ---- :'1~ · ~. h'i ~\ ~~ ,~()~.^~ Q~ ~~~~ l .)'1 V~'v ^. q <:::>091 ~F~~ ~ ^- V ^yO ')~~~~~~1l" . .f 'V{) ovo"V ~\~~ ~ <:> ()~ ~~:;t'~ ~ 't::: ~ . ~ 0 <:> . I -... (ZONING & LAND US,E _J' "'-EXHIBIT B '. . ~ ;. : _ ~ OHANGE FROM "LOW/MED RES. DENSrrv- L J NORTH PCZ-90-B L".CnTAVLAKER...,.UHRT. ~rTY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPT.-ADVANCE DIV. 818181 C.COVARRUBIAS ~~c ""~-I l ~ .. o ! . 0__ a I J ! ] . ] J I I I I I I I I I < ,l ' '> EAST "H" STREET/OTA Y LAKES ROAD TRAFFIC STUDY , , Submitted To: _ CITY OF CHULA VISTA Planning Department 276 Fourth A venue Chula Vista, California 92010 t Submitted By: P&D TECHNOLOGIES 401 West" A" street. Suite 2500 San Diego, California 92101 (619) 232.-4466 April 1991 Project No. 10369.00 '. I, ( .1 '- rABLE OF CONTENTS g';l10N 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Description . . 2.0 EXISTING SE1TING . ". 2.1 Project Location. : 2.2 Existing Circulation System . 3.0 METHODOLOGY- 3.1 Trip Generation . 3.2 Trip Distribution . 3.3 Traffic Assignment , 3.4 Background Traffic Projections 3.5 Level of Service Analysis 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS 4.1 Alternative Land Uses. I I I I I I I I I I 5.0 CIRCULA nON IMPAcr MfIlGA nON 5.1 Discussion of Improvements . 5.2 Explicit Responsibilities for Mitigation . APPENDICES A TRIP GENERA nON RATES B LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINITION C CHULA VISTA ROADWAY CAPACITY STANDARDS D lCU CALCULA nONS , .. ) PAGE 1-1 1-1 . 2-1 2-1 . . 2-1 3-1 3-1 3-4 . 3-4 3-4 . . 3-7 4-1 4-1 5-1 5-1 5-4 f, (l\ ) i LlSTOFFIGURES I I J'1G~ NO. PAGE 1-1 Proposed Site Plan . 1-2' I 2-1 Vicinity Map . 2-2 . I 2-2 East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road - Existing . 2-3 Intersection Geometries . - I 3-1 Trip Distribution 3-5 3-2 Existing Traffic Volumes &. Level of Service . . 3-9 3-3 Near-Term Traffic Volumes &. Level of SelVice . 3-10 " 3-4 Near-Term Traffic Volumes &. Level of Service . 3-12 (With Proposed Project) 5-0 Intersection Geometric Improvements . 5-2 UST OF TABLES TABLE NO. PAGE 3-1 Trip Generation - Proposed Project . 3-1 3-2 intersection Level of Service Sununary . . 3-8 4-1 Trip Generation - Alternative Uses . . 4-2 4-2 Level of SelVice Summary - Alternative Uses . . . 4-3 , '. 'I !I 'I ; I , , I I I .... __ . _ 1:;.; . ......-- - , " ) SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCfION This'report addresses the traffic impacts of a proposed commercial development in the City of Chula Vista. This study was prepared for the Kelton Title ColpOration and presents the basic resource infonnation, analysis and fmdings for the portion 'bf the circulation systein that will be affected by the new development. The objective of this analysis is to verify the adequacy of the existing circulation system and t=ommcnd n~ary improvements where appropriate. 1.1 PROJECT DESCRlP1'ION The proposed development is located on a 3.6 acre site and will consist of four buildir:gs including a bank, a fast-food restaurant, a family-style restaurant and various sman commerchl 'shops. Total leasable area will equal approximately 35,400 square feet. The site plan for the ' proposed project is displayed in Figure 1-1. . , 1-1 - .....El \ . ";, . . ... :). c:: !2 c:\S u. -- 0.. eD ..... .- en "'0 CD (/) o % '- 0.. -----\( -;-- . - .1 ~ , E /\ ] I I I I- I I I I I I I C.\...J ') SECTION 2.0 EXISTING SETIING 2.1 PROJECT LOCATION The proposed project is located on the southeast comer of the East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road, intersection. Regionally this location lies in the "Eastern Territories" of Chula Vista as shown . , in Figure 2-1.' . 2.2 EXISTING CIRCULATION SY~i'EM Access to the project will be provided by both East "H" Street and Otay Lakes Road. East "H" stieet, west of Otay Lakes Road <:urrently operates as a six-lane primary arteri~ fac~ty. ,East of Otay Lakes Roadt East "Htt Street operates as a four-lane major arterial facility. Each of these sections of East "H" Stree~ are bui't to their ultimate designations under the City of Chula Vista , General Plan. Otay ~es Road, south of East "Htt Street currently provides four travel lanes and a two-way center turn lane. North of East "H" Street, c>tay Lakes Road operates as a four-Jane major arterial. It is divided by a raised median from, East "H" Street ~ortherly to Ridgeback Road. The Chula Vista General Plan calls for Otay Lakes Road to ultimately operate as a six- lane primary arterial facility. Figure 2-2 displays the existing lane geometry of the East "Ht' Street/Otay Lakes Road intersection / , 2-1 . '. ..-c . -- (,. \, , \ ) I I I J ~ , )H\. ~ r ltr- J .. >> ., .' F~~e2~ "East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road Existing Inte.rs~etion Geometries ~ ".~,,",,_M'____'_~"""'~-" .-. --,--.-----------..'.-..--..-.. - . ~~ e ~. c. S!! ~ u. ~ ~ ....... -- c .- o 5 '" l ~ tal ~ ij'l 'S- .. ~ ~ i$ tn - > < .;..s ::> :x: o \~, . . L;;\ \ \, \............ \ II 1 If? J fD ~ i$ - z o m r --. .-..... ~ -.. .. - .- . -.-'. (-l i SECfION 3.0 METHODOLOGY This Section of the report discusses the methodology used and assumptions made in the analysis of uaffic impacts created by the proposed project as well as by the alternative land uses specified for consideration by the Oty. 3.1 TRIP GENERATION Trip generation rates from the City of San Diego were used in this study and are summarized in . . Appendix A. City of San Diego rates were utilized because they allow consideration of both a "driveway" rate and a "cumulative" generation rate. The "driveway" rate reflects the total daily vebicular+raffic projected to access the project site. However, much of this traffic will consist of vehicles already on the roadway which will u~ the development's facilities as an intermediate stop. The "cumulative" rate takes this into account and projects the "net new" traffic or cumulative increase in overall traffic due to the proposed project activities. Table 3-1 sununarizes the trip generation for the proposed project T~c entering and leaving the project is expected to total approximately 5,500 trips per day. Passer-by trips account for approximately 4,100 of these. This results in a total of 1,400 daily trips actually added to the surrounding street system. , . 3-1 '. _.. - ., I l; 1= 00 t- ~ ~ c.., '" CL.O ('t') - \0 IlI':l ~.s 00 - '" 4IIlt ~ - Co ('t') - \0 is - t ~ '" - ~ 4IIlt 0 0\ Z '" ~ - e. 4IIlt ~ 00 - - l .. - -ii ~ ...: ::s C) c:: ..; - a -- -a -;; .~ 0 ~ t2. :s - Cd-': ::s S -e- ~ - 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ::SC)";t 85-;; 4IIlt 4IIlt . 4IIlt e uo~ t.) c .~ ~ ~- u ~ ct8 00 t- oo 00 t- oe ~ , tt') 00 - 00 - ~ f: ~ ~.s 0 B -0 00 00 ~ 00 r-- 00 < e ~B: ('t') '" co - ~ ~ C) ~ - . -iz Cf.l ~O 'Co ~ .C ~ c B I f-i '" \0 0\ ~ S ~ 0 CI:S ~ < '" '" 4IIlt -0 E t .00 4IIlt.. r-- N '" t.) .- .. i - '" ~ > .J:) ~ ...: C'4_ J!i i- 0 ~c::..; .a. .- - ~ Cl:SO~ t2. Co g ~.= CI) ~~- 0 ~ ~ 0 S .. -0 4IIlt r-- ::s t.) ~c::"it r-- N ~ II) 6>- ::s o~ -- i -0 I Ii - r -fa - t C) -sf '" . 0 4IIlt ~ - ('t') g I -- .s ~ oe 00 4IIlt c:: - ('t') N.. t":. 00 ~ ~ I .. rf ~ - t- ('t') '" 6- N - ('t') fI) =5 I ... g ... .c c2 .. 1 ~ B I C) ! ~ ~ CI.l ~ :::J , - ~ ! ~ - C'4 "C .S ..!. ~ - Cf.l ~ ~ tJ. .6> I ~ ~ I .-....-....,'-...---............--.-" . .~..._~,-,~~~".....---~..,~.....-."'-'-'~~~---~-~ ..~_.-. .... .~ ,o~....,...."'. ~.".......... ....- . - ..-"._- ..-. (ll ) 3.2 TRIP DISTRmUTION The distribution patterns of traffic destined to a.1d originating from the proposed project are shown in Figure 3-1. These patteI:nS were derived based upon twn moves at the East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road intersection along with knowledge of planned development in the &rea. . Due to the project's proximity to the East "H~' ::-treet/Otay Lakes Road intersection, median openings allowing left-turn access to the development Will Dot be permitted according to CluIa Vista Traffic Enginee~g Staff. Thus, access to the project will consist of right-turn- " in/right-twn-out only. This will caUSf'. a diversion in the Donnal traffic patterns of some . . . p-oject traf?c through the East "H" St:-eet/Otay Lakes Road intersection. Specifically, an increase in U-turn activity at the interrection is expected as patrons attempt to enter the , . . project from the east or exit the project to the south. 3.3 TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Based on the access constraints and the trip distribution pattern mentioned above, project related traffic was assigned to East "H" Street and Otay Lakes Ro~d~ In addition, those trips determined to be of the passer-by nature (approximately 75% of the total in this case) were assigned noting that these trips are Dot round-trips but rather trips with a final destination further down their initial route. 3.4 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS As instructed by the City of Chula Vista Planning Depment, P&D Technologies utilized the 'Iiansportation Phasing Plan traffic.volume forecast produc~ by Willdan Associates as the source for 1995 (linear-term") background traffic in the study &rea. The volumes reflected in this forecast include all traffic generated by -approved" development in the Eastern Territories. ("Approved" is defined as those projects with approved Final and Tentativt Subdivision Maps.) These m'odeUed volumes have been updated to reflect the latest results which incorporate SANDAG 1995 Series 7 land use forecasts. 3-3 /_. - . ~ .,f . . I , Peak hom intersection turn volumes associated with these anticipat~ Average Daily Traffic (AnT) volumes were not available. therefore P&D used "CINCH" computer software to estimate them. Thts estimate is made based on the methodology outlined in Transportation Research Record Dl.JDber 795 and utilizes information regarding existing turn movements. expected ADT on the approaches, and the daily ~tional volume split assumed for each approach. It was conservatively assumed that the percentage of daily traffic occuning in the PM peak hom Will be 10%. The results are shown in Figure 3-3. 'The extremely large increases in turn" m~"ements to and from the south Otay Lakes Road approach are driven by . the modelling results; these project a significant increase in ttaffic on Otay ~es Road south of East "H" Street with relatively minor increases projected for the other roadway segments. The 1995 ~affic forecast was developed under the assumption that SR-125 is Dot yet. constructed. City staff indicate that completion of a SR-125 facility (interim or freeway) would be expected to reduce traffic volumes on the roadways of interest in this study. Thus the assumption here that SR-125 is not in place presents a worst case near term scenario. . ,. It should be stated that while modelled 1995 traffic~volumes and projected intersection turn movements represent the best information available at this time, the City should continue to monitor the traffic levels and turn movements to verify circu1apon patterns and growth . projections. , 3-4 ~ G) '- ~ (/) :t c en to \U " , , '. -~ I . C") . . e ::J. C ~ 0 LL. .- ..... :J .c .- ... ..... en .- o c. ~ CD ~~ ~ i ig 5E ! 0 ::i.... tC ~ .~ i=! ~~ w w " " tC i m u ffi ffi A. A. II II .0 ffit~ CJ ." ." LLI )()( ...I )()( . ! .~ 10 ~ ( " ""ll ) . 3.5 LEVEL OF SERVICE ANALYSIS In order to evaluate the operating conditions of a circulation system, the concept of Level of Service (LOS) has been developed. It is a qualitative measure of the effect on traffic flow of factors such as speed, travel time, interruption. and freedom to maneuver. Levels of service are rated "A" through "F' with LOS A signifying the best' operating conditions and LOS F representing the worst A table defining levels of service A through F is provided in Appendix B. Standards for "acceptable" v~sus "unacceptable" LOS vary from community to community. In CluIa Vista. the standard for .acceptable level of s~rvice on arterial roadways is LOS D OF better. For signalized intersections, LOS D is permitted for not more than two bours per day. .', , Pursuant to Oty of Chula Vista Traffic Engineering Department specifications, two methods have been utilized to analyze level of service. F~st, arterial ADT projections have been compared to the street capacity criteria shown in Appendix B to calculate link specific volurne-to-capaci.ty (vIe) ratios. Second, the Intersection Capacity Utilization (lCU) methodology bas been used to calculate PM peak hour vlc ratios' and corresponding levels of service. \. Level of service analysis was conducted on three separate scenarios. They include: · Existing conditions . "Near-term" background conditions . "Near-tenn" background plus proposed project conditions. , 3-6 (l SEGMENTS Daily traffic volume projections for adjacent roadway segments along with COITe5ponding levels of service for each ease are shown in Figure 3-2, 3-3, and 3-4. These indiCtte that Otay Lakes Road south of East "H" Street is projected to experience the largest increase in traffic volume, growing from approximately 18,000 (existing) to 33,000, ADT by 1995 given approved development in the area. This near term volume exceeds the capacity of t. Cass I Collector and would n:sult in LOS F operations in the absence of improvements. ~terim improvement of Otay Lakes Road to 4-lane major arterial standards (as e~si north of ~t "H" Street) would provide sufficient capacity to accomoclate this projected growth. Also, the . construction of a SR-125 facility would reduce traffic volumes in this area in the near term. The project is anticipated to add approximately 200 ADT to this roadway, ~gment. This volume '(less than 1 %) would not have a significant impact on LOS. All other roadway segments now operate at LOS A and are projected t9 continue at this uncongested level in .- the near term. INTERSECTIONS Since background traffic volumes and trips generated by the project are greater in the PM peak hour than in the AM peak hour, analysis was limited to the PM peak hour in order to simplify calculations as well as present the worst case scenario. The Intersection Capacity Utilization (lCU) method has been used to calculate PM peak hour , . vlc ratios and corresponding levels of service based oil estimated futme intersection turn movements. Clula Vista recommends the following vehicles per hour per lane capacities be used for the lCU calculations: .' Turning lane capacity = 1,500 vph . Three lane capacity = 1!700 vph ".~ r 3-7 '. ,- .- ~- ( { . . I ........ ~ ' '\ Table 3-2 INTERSECI10N LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY Scenario PM Peak Hour lCU LOS Existing Conditions .53 A F Projected 1995 ~ackground Traffic Volumesl 1.09 Projected 1995 Background Traffic Volumes with Improvements and with Proposed Projecf ..80 C/O The lCU calculation results are summarized in Table 3-2. As indicated, the level of service at this inter~tion Will worsen due to th~ projected volume increase associated with approved development. This increase is most significant on Otay Lakes Road south of East -H" Street. . Associated with the projected doubling in ADT on this 'segment is a significant iricrease in turn movements both to and from this approach. The res~lt would be LOS F operations in the PM peak period if existing intersection geometries were maintained. This impact can be mitigated . to LOS D through provision of a dual left turn lane on the northbound approach of Otay Lakes . Road. Although the exact duration of this level of service cannot be detennined given the forecasted methodology, it is expected to be limited to the afternoon peak period. The proposed project will result in increased left turn and U-turn activity at this intersection due to the imposed access restrictions at its driveways. The addition of project turn volumes to those projected in 1995 will require p~ovision of a dual left turn lane westbound on East -H" Street to mitigate project impacts. This improvement would result in LOS C/O operation (ICU=.80) as . . reflected in Figure 3-4. I From Willdan Associates modelling as described in text. r 2 Impr~vements include dual left turn lanes northbound and westbound. 3-8 , , . -- "- ~ ~-' I. I I I I I I t; CD ... - en !s: c (;; m uJ .. , \~ ~ ~ DQ ~, " - en 9 ""- u " ~ Zen b Ow 1=> < ~o II - en:l: u CD .... ! f5~ )( c )( ~~ .)( ~ z - S UJ )( )( " )( . UJ )( )( ~.. i . 4: " ~ . e- o o o. an ~ - 4: " CD . I. co ~ %~ . CD ~ ... ::J. Q) .2> 0 I.L. __ ~ Q) (f) ~ o Q) ,> Q) ...J eo c: a3 U) Q) E :J - ~ o -- ~ ~ C\1 .= C) c: -- ~ U) -- )( W i (.1 .- "' CD ... ~ fI) :t s en ~ " , I I I . I I \ I I , 2 ..... !; ..;. 8 ..... ..... ... . - ) 2 ..... fi\ ..;, g ~ ~ (l) - 0 9 ....... CJ ..... .Z ~ 00 5 i3~ wO " 0:E - c:Z CJ c ~e ...... >C Z >C - >< IJJ - CJ ~ IJJ >C ,.( >C .~ ' . ('l') . . ! =. 0> ,.... DO"- i:i: __ 0 ~.Q) Q)O (/)0- '+-.r; 0..- -a>~ >'-" Q)tn -1"- -oC . c Q) ~E Q) (/) >. 0>0 E~ :)0- -E 0- ::>.c o~ =~ ~ .=. .. .', - E ~ ~ s- ea CL> Z - - LO 0) 0) ..... !! ! ~ f~ ~ ..._--~---- /.- ~ 1 J t ] . } ,I I ( . SECTION 4.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS This section of the report discusses the development alternatives for the proposed project. 4.1 ALTERNATIVE LAND USES Five alternative land uses for the project site w~re analyzed and their respective 1rip generation totals based on the genera.tion rates presented in Appendix A, are presented in Ta,ble 4-1. From the table it is seen that each of the five alternatives will create fewer daily trips than the proposed project and therefore will impact the circulation system to a les~ degree. Analysis was conducted for the East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road intersection for each alternative. Since background traffic volumes and trips generated by each of the alternatives are gJ'Cclter in , the PM peak hour than in the AM peak hour, analysis was limited to the PM peak hour in order to simplify calculations as well as present a worst case scenario. Results of the analysis are shown in Table 4-2. It should be noted that analysis for each of the alternatives was conducted with the assumption that improvements required by the "near-t~rm" background traffic alone are complete. These . improvements are discussed in Section 5 - Circulation Impact Mitigation. , 4-1 '. ~ V"l \C - V"l co "'lIt \C - cor\ - ::E - \C - V"l ~ .... <" \C .... cor\ .- - u > ~ .- ~ ~ ~ V"l' 0 ~ - &0 Q cor\ ~ CO - cor\ \C ~ .... = < E - 1 a t3 ... co E cor\ V"l co "'lIt c; = 0 ~ r-- - = tI) - - Ii .::> ~ ::E .~ u c..c co 0\ cor\ V"l ~ - .. - M 0 r-- - - 0 ~... M - ! . " co \C 0\ cor\ co 0 u< ~c5 0 0\ - - 5~ ~ - If c \C \0 0\ ~ V"l ~ Oc ~~ co :E- "'lIt 0\ M - ~! ~ - u< > < ,. .C . . ~ .5 :Sf Q i- O"B ~z ~ 0 cor\ V"l 0 0 0 Q cor\ V) t"- oo V"l <"0 ~ < "l. ~ "'It.. cor\ ~ - ~.= V) ~ - <g U) .- ~ cD ~ M o as 0 u.: u.: u.: u.: .. .. "B~ ::> ::> ~ ~ M cti cti cti cti Q Q ~ S ~ ::> .c .::: ~ cor\ 8 co ~ V"l V"l :l f! u: - 00 cor\ - ._ u "'lIt.. V"l "l. -c c:r .. ftu V"l 0\ - V"l ...0 U) cor\ - cor\ ~ =c. O.C :s~ N' -Cu . ~ c~ ~ f"') ~ as . u 8 .;; ca .;; ca as ::> - B.B c.::: fol .c 5 -c ~ a 1 ~5 t~ S . "0 "0 ... 8 u "B .- . .- .1 ic .c 0 ::E~ .s~ e ::l e. !;~ "i o ~ u .c:u > l R~ -::s. co Co. - ~ cor\ "'lIt V"l E ~ u - < Co. -" &..AI ~- .~ ~ ~ - .- . ,~- -- _..- ~ ~ ~. .. -- .- . '.( ~ ^ ~- _.".,.~..",~."..,.-,--,",-,".".._,,~._,..~-~'-~~-~'_'-~ ,-,... ."....""----_.~~.--.,~"'~-~~--_.-.'''-,.~~_..,. -----------. -,----------------- ._..__.~-~ - - . (, Table 4-2 LEVEL OF SERVICE. SUMMARY. ALTERNATIVE USES PM Peak Hour Land Use ICU No Development 1.091 Propose 1 Project (See Table 3-2) .8ot Post Office .84' Library .85' Church .83' Medium Density .83' Residential Low Density .83' . Residential . LOS .F C/O 'DO D D D D p. Proposed Project I _ Assumes no intersection improvements 2 II: Assumes dual left turn lanes on Aorthbound and westbound approaches , . Assumes dual left turn lane on northbound approach , . 4-3 :J I . . ,- I ]- I ] l , ~; SECTION 5.0 CIRCULATION IMPACT MITIGATION This ~on discusses the circulation improvements that are n:commended for mitigation of traffic impacts associated with near term groWth in the area, as wdl as those created by the proposed project. 5.1 DISCUSSION OF .IMPROVEME~ The improvements necessary in order to maintain Clula Vista City standards for level of service are discussed below. Becauie Otay Lakes Road and East "Ii" Street are inciuded in Clula . VISta's DIP (Development Impact Fee) network, this ,project's contribution toward these improvements is defmed based on development square footage. As discussed, ~e improvements are ~ on segment volume projections (and related intersection turn movement estimates) which indicate an extremely large increase in traffic. on Olay Lakes Road south; of East "H" Street. While these projections represent the best information available at this time, the City should continue to monitor the traffic levels and turi1 movements to verify circulation patterns and growth projections, and that these improvements are appropriate to meet future demands, particularly as they are impacted by SR-12S. The completion of these, improvements would result in the circulation system functioning .. , acceptably well into the future. It should be noted that all of the improvements listed except the addition of a dual left turn lane westbound on East "Ii" Street are wmanted by development already approved by the City. They are Dot a direct result of the proposed project and would be necessary i1Tespective of whether the site is developed. o The circulation element of the Clula Vista General Plan calls for Otay Lakes Road to ultimately be constructed to six-Jane primary arterialltandards. 1995 Volume projections indicate that dual1eft turn lanes will be necessary on the northbound approach at the East "H" Street intersection. With this in mind, it is suggested that this project, fronting Otay Lakes Road, dedicate the additional right-of-way necessary to accommodate future half width-improvements consistent r 5-1 , ... ~ I I I I I .1 ~I i . ) J 1 , I .', ,'" '.- t ~ I' ) with this ultimate cross-section. Ultimately, this will require similal: dedication of additional right-of-way from the unimproved parcel fronting the west side of Otay Lakes Road so that proper lane alignment across the in~on can be maintained. o In addition to the right-of-way dedication, an interim upgrade of Otay Lakes Road south of East "H" Street to four-lane major arterial standards will be required to accommodate projected 1995 traffic levels. This project provides an opportUnity to complete these half-widths improvements along the east side of the portion of Otay Lakes Road fronting the property. These improvements should be engineered for consistency with JIle ultimate cross-section as weD as providing a safe alignment with Otay Lakes Road across the intersection. This may require concwrent half-width improvements to the western side of the roidway. . . . o The circulation element of the Chula Vista General Plan calls for East "H" StreCt heading easterly, to transition from a six-lane primaiy arterial to a four-lane major roadway as it crosses Otay Lakes Road. 1995 projections indicate the addition of a dual left-turn lane on the westbound approach of East "H" Street will be required to mitigate project impacts in conjunction with the growth in near tenD traffic, and that the existing exclusive right turn lane on this approach is not required. It is recommended that the subject property dedicate the additional right-of-way required to accommodate an ultimate East "H" Street cross-section consistent with these requirements. T~ ensure proper lane alignment across the intersection when these ultimate improvements are completed, similar dedication will be required from the school property fronting the nonh side of East "H" Street at this intersection. , o This project does provide an opponunity to make some of these improvements to the east approach. The required dual left turn lane westbound and the transitional third through lane eastbound could be consU'Ucted at the expense of the existing exclusive westbound right turn lane. The resulting intersection geometrics would . be as shown in Figure 5-1. In order to maintain a safe alignment with East "H" Street across the intersection, concurrent half-width improvements to the northside of East "H" Street may be required. o Additional ROW dedication and completion of further ultimate intersection improvements should be completed when development of the southwest quadrant occurs or when the City's annual Traffic Monitoring program identifies the need. , . 5-2 , t.. . fJ t ~ I o 'll c )Hl . c ., ltr . . J .. .. ~ ~ ~. t l : l , r I ! I , I I , EXISTING GEOMETRies .-k. . . ... F )Hl J . lltr .. ~ r NEAR-TERM GEOMETRies Figure 5-1 East "H" St.reet/Otay Lakes Road rrE Intersection Geometries g . .__,_____"_...._,.'.'"......cl~,."~~....=-----.--"-'~,... .. .......""~,,--_...;.~._,._.--,......,._-_._' c... _' . ~. :' ) In summary, substantial cumulative traffic increases are projected to occur at the East -H" Street/Otay Lakes Road intersection given the level of approved development occuning in the area. This is particularly the case for Otay Lakes Road south of East "H" ~trCet. As a result, improvements will be required to maintain acceptable City operation standards irrespective of whether the site is developed or of the proposed usage. With the above described improvements and dedications, the circulation system will function acceptably. The project should contribute to these improvements according to the procedures defined in the City's DJF program. While . . the project does provide an opportunity to implement some of these imp' 3vements, the Gty . . should monitor circulation in the area as development continues to ensure. that required modifications are timely and efficient. I I ] I I ~ I 5.2 EXPLICIT RESPONSIBILITIES FOR MITIGATION Responsibilities of the Developer: o Dedicate necessary right-of-way and construct an additional nonhbound lane along Otay Lakes Road fronting the project consistent with an ultimate six-lane prime arterial roadway. : o Dedicate neces~3I)' right-of-way and construct a transition lane needed for eastbound traffic on East t'H" Street fronting the project consistent with an ultimate four-lane major roadway. . . I I I I I I I I I o Modify the traffic signal at East "Hn Street and Otay Lakes Road in conjunction with street improvements. o Contribute funds to the Development Impact Fees and' Traffic Signal Fees financing program. - .. . _. ~. -'::. ....-, : ....-, _......~- . y .' "t- " Responsibilities of the City of Chula Vista: o Construct dual left turns on all legs of the intersection of East "Htt Street and Otay Lakes Road when traffic demands indicate their need as determined by the City Engineer through the City's Traffic Monitoring Program. The recommended improvement shall be implemented at such time as deemed neCessary by the Gty Engineer. ~- r 54 , f .' t J ;l . , ) \. - ~ t t i .. . " ~ 11 r1 .. r1 1 'I J . i I I I I . <-,....-. 1 r I 1 APPENDIX A TRIP GENERATION RATES ". (, ' ) ) APPENDIX A AVERAGE DAILY TRIP RATES I , , I I I I I I I I I I I Land Use Driveway ADT Rate "Cumulative" ADT Rate Retail 40/1000 S.F. 40/1.000 S.F. Bank 200/1.000 S.F. 40/1.000 S.F. Restaurant 200/1.000 S.F. 40/1.000 S.F. . Fast Food 770/1.000 S.F. 40/1,000 S.F. ATM 260lUnit 40lUnit Library 46/l.ooo S.F. 20/1.000 S.F. , Post Office 140/1.000 S.F. 20/1,000 S.F. Church 15/1.000 S.F. 15/1.000 S.F. " Low Density Res. 101D.U. N/A Med. Density Res. SID.U. N/A Source: City of San Diego Weekday Trip Generation Rates . r . . .--------_.._-_.~--_.._--_. --- --- ---.---------- . , ~ [ I , t r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. . 1 o a t o ~ ~ o ~ . a ... . r -_.__...~._.~-_..._.. l,l APPENDIX ~ LEVEL OF SERVICE DEFINmON ._.-,,-w,_. . . ""..,~~--------_......-_.~. .-- ij I ~ I ~ ]. 1 ! 1. ~ 1 I 1 1 ] , . l , 1 1 l . 1 . 1 f 1 ; I l I 1 , II } ') Level of Service Volume Capacity Ratio Traffic Flow Characteristics F Level-of-Service F is. used to "define forced or breakdown flow. This condition exists wherever the amount of traffic approaching a point exceeds the amount which can traverse the point. Queues form behind such locations. Vehicles may progress at reasonable speeds for several hundred feet or mote, then be required to stop in a cyclic fashion. Level-of- Service F is used to describe the operating conditions within the queue, as well as the point of the breakdown. OVel 1.00 Source: Hil!hwav CarJncitv' Manllal. Special Report 209, r"nspo['ttltio!l Research Board, Nationttl Research CouncU, 1985. , , (c. .. APPENDIX C ." CHULA VISTA ROADWAY CAPACITY AND DESIGN STANDARDS ~I "I I I I I I!~ I I , ~] ]"- -] -] ] J J I I I I I I I I I 1;- I I (. ) . CITY OF CHUlA VISTA ROAD\VAY CAPACITY STANOAROS. A WRAGE DAILY \'EHICLE TRIPS ROAD LEVEL OF SERVICE (..t..ASS . '{-SECTION A V Ie Ratio (.6) B (.7) c . (.8)" D (.9) E (1.0) . Expressway 104/128 52,500 61,300 70,000 78,800 ~7 ,500 Prime Artedal 104/128 37~00 43,800 50,000 56,300 62,500 Maj~r Stree; (6 lanes) 104/128 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000 50,000 Major Street (4 lanes) 80/104 22;500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37,500 CassI Collector 74/94 16,500 19,300 22,000 24,800 27,500 Cass n Collector 52/72 9,000 10,500 12,000 . 13,500 15,000 Cass m Collector 40/60 5,600 6,600 7~00 8,400 9,400 .' . LOS 'e Capacities are from the City of Chula' Vista Circulation Element of tbe. General Plan. Other levels of service are der,ived by volume to capacity (V IC) ratios. r I . . ) . I: , ~- I ~ -I I ~ , : tl10~ I ~ . 1 l'; I · , ',", '01 t 1{ . << -", I . ( . i" .! · I . !u ~ · tJJtt~.L ~ I ... ... :\: i i ;Q ... ~ ~r:-'i I I 'i: i' ~ ~ '" '" - ~ . ..... . .-h- 4~ I ~ I .~ ~ I ' " ... ~. I I 4 I . I . ,. I .. I .. . . ~ I I -I l I ! at .. I . . 'l .. I . . 5~ ~ ~ 51 t 4 . '" .. . ~t I I ... tt I I :: .. I I I . I ..:: . I I I . 'r ~ I il ~ I ~ - Iir' t .. I c I . ... t G ~ ~ ~ to ~~ . I' I . ts ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . = 1 ... . ~ " t ""S ... t ... . .. t.. .. I - .) I · i ~.. . 1 1 · "'S ~ . 4lI" ". ~ ~- ~ .... ~ ~ . I- ~ . 1 I · ~ . ~ ~ ... I ~ , to .. ~ . . .., I ... .... ~ ... ... ..., i ~ ~ "- . ~, ,I ~ ~ .. . ... . ~ ! ~ I I' - .... Ct , .. . .; . . ~ I ~ ~ I I . ~ . ~ .. . " 4 . .... " << .. , .. ( . .. ( .. . ~ . .. .. . .. .; ~, 4 I .1 . l' !i . '* ,t = I . ,~ .. I I · ,~ c " .. I 1 " I t _.. I · !I 'I - .. . . I~ .. I~ .. I' I .. . I' ;;,' t ~\ . " ~ I ,,,I t .. '~I .. '~I I ~(t . . ! . ~ ~ .. " . ! . .. = i"~ i"~ I i .. ~I~ I ~~~ tIi ~ -, ~ i It ~ I! I 1 t t ! ~1" << << '- -17- I -~-_.._"~-~_.~--,,-- -. - ~ ...... .. ,.. '.- -'.~" ......... .-.. -.' , .~.. ~-_.. - ... '",'~"""" - -, --- ,- - - ~ . ~. --- . - -, ]. .. \\- \ ) --~.~' II JH .. 'I ~ I I ] . I << << ( I '~;' I I ( .u ] . 1._~~~_.L . ~ ... I I I · I r ~ eo,. ... ;; ... 'D ~ . -+-: ~ i '~+.l i t ' , ~ ~ t ... .. .. 401 1 , I , I .. , . ) I .~ I I I ., ~ ! I .. , I I t ~ .... I Ill.. I " J I III 5! .~ , ..... 1 I ! t~ I I .... I ! , t~ , , ~ ;t !~ J. c: J I 1 ~ I I 'C '" I ... .." I .'.1 .t .. t.. J I . . ,,, .... I .. . . ~ I t , I 1 I I ... ... '" ... ... ... I. I I ~ I : . ~I . . ~I ~ ~ . . ~ .. " .. " ... ", . I " ". , ," ~ t; ~ '" I t: ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ... ... ~. I I I I i I 1 .. ci :: ~ ~ I I I . ~ ~ t t .. ( ... t ~ I I , I I ~ ~ ( t I t .. !:. . I I J If ~ , ... I~ l:. I I . I 'I~ = . , t . I t I ~~ I t , , I. 1 , , ;1 I. I , I .... , t !, .. .. .. :: I! '" , I , ;; - . I ' , , , ~..; ~i I ~~- b ::..... .. II: . ! ~4ji . -11.- I l J ,"- J ] ] ] ] ] I I I I I ] ] I J J J . \. { , '. '- , r . APPENDIX D leu CALCULATIONS ". ~ I 16:1 i "" EastllH"~~reetlOtay lakes RoaaTraffic St~dY INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION WORKSHEET J J J J I I. ~ I t I , t J , J I O. 19 I ;'Z7 ~ II (D'IS I I ZIB ~ J L , :d~ ~~: Ie ~ I~'f rr~ L_.LL_ ~ REMARKS -- EA/~rl"-' Con d,"T1ons . . PM PEAK HOUR , .,; 1:1: . . ~ ., ..J ."-1 51 -.., I ZII .~ lfi" co " " Il'I ~ .3 ~ Eastbound ~"'5 I) : 0." 3'+DO Westbound 19f.1 13 - O. 1500 I 'fo.I'1 I East -H- ST. · Critical Movement leu. 0.53 LOS.m .Job No. . 10369.00 Date 8/6/1990. J )' _. o. J J J J J J ] ] J I J J I I I I I ~ . ..~:... ...~ . :... :'.-:". :". .,:. ~qq5.: (!_~,T~~ ~ol.~",~ tOJ",.: :"" ;." INTERSECTION CAPACITY unLtZA TION CALCULA noN WORKSHEET '. - ... ".. ~..~:~ -.i . , " .. ... &.ocatOoft ~ .,-4' 5trLe.:t d O~ W...t..o 'Koo.d Northbound I l_:a._l )1 I~ . :-'4~ "'~'-~ ~ .a I~1.J ~~I . "il I( .t 1_11_ L... REMARKS Eastbound '1 ~:: S3 500' · . \ -::, iDO(" - :. .18 2 )(1.00 Southbound 0 Westbound ~" .2l:L ::.. 15 r .3l./0 ;soc; ::; . .:23 2. 'Ie "CO . .3 5 (. 8 , 7 8 ti \-i .,,\ '" , " I 415 f I /--13'K>1 I ~~3 ~ I II leDL, I I {~BB ~ 1 "1 ~ q "1 I 6 q '0 o · Critical Movement " leu .. I.Oq lOS.0 Job No_ Date . . ,._,_,~........~.~_~",,~.~.<,,_,.~,.,,~..,~_N__~-.~--- ~ '. ~ J 1 1 I I I I I I I 11.- I I East "H;' bt'reetlOtay Lakes Roa'd Traffic Study INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION WORKSHEET LKltion East wt:l:.S..treet,& Otay ~ Northbound ~q3+ u.:L: o.Z7 '3400 Southbound ~ 17"- -_ - IZ ..... 1:5 CCJ .. .. 13at ~ I Or 25 II' z. Ii ;, t I 1/.2.,'3 " 1 _ ~_ ! :d~ ~~~ 1 .,] Z ~,..j .,,?;=:!- 'il If ~ ~_LL ~ -d a: .. " ~ CJ .... Eastbound /Z.'i3 : O. z,S 5100 Westbound tJz" = t:). It/- 3.000. "-i ~I I <II I IZ30 f (0./4 I . ~ 'fL~ I U\~~ ~ ~ .~ ~ . REMARKS Ne:v-(erm B~ro"~ Th:!JtI1c.. T. Al-T..L ~ PM PEAK HOUR East -H- ST. · Critical Movement ICU = 0./8 LOS'~ Job No. 10369.00 Date 8/6/1990' I: I' ~:.:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II- I J ", . : ~. ....::. ,. -..:" .- \c! ~ . . 'QC\.5 .WI-f.11 Pr:o,w ~,~ .~.'~~~~ .,... .::. .' . ." . .. ..' . t . . . . . ..." "'f. '. fa . INTERSECTION CAPACITY unUZA TlON CALCULA nON WORKSHEET. . :. ~. .. :.. . ~.. Locatio" G.o-t '. ,f S tru.t" a.t ~" Wu..o €cod Northbound " ~~~ I: ,.sl ,. 2. ",StX.' Southbound o i 5\~ $ . r5 - ,2.x \/00 . 3 5 I 3 r 0 Bail , I J :2~3 ~ II !.n14 I I ~8~ ~ ! _ 2_1 :d~ ~~1 ~ J. ]~1 rr1~ :I 'I ~ ----- ~ RE"'-A.RKS . '. Eastbound --"'" 1,"74. . :. 2.0 2 )('ioO Westbound r ''''20 _ ......." - ., '-\ L')l' ~ """" .' . . '-uO~ .. I .....,8 (I ~ 420 I , i · Critical Movement o leu. . eo LO~'] C/D I Job No. Date ~. .." JId I I I I ,- I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ......-:. - - .-- - - .Lt East "H" Street/Otay Lakes Road Traffic Study INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION CALCULATION WORKSHEET ....,ioft Northbound "B8 + ZZZ = o.Z7 34fe>o Southbound ~ 11#9 _ _ _ 0, II 15~O 6" "" - o 6' E)' <>> 0 ..0 .. I 391 ~ I ",25 II Ize2. t I '/-1.3 ~ 1_ 1:-_ 1 :d~ ~~~ '- ~ I:;;i rr~ . ;_LL_ m ,; a: ., ., oX c ..J Eastbound 12.81. :: O. z.s 5100 Westbound ,/1' :: o.lc.f 3000 "-i ~I I - 1/.l50 I J D./i' , ~ 'fl(' I .' tJ\ 6" '" .I) (J) '" .... m .N . rn REMARKS Ntar-7i:!rm Bcac.Ksror.)r'C/. TraUcc.. -+ Acr 2... PM PEAK HOUR East -He ST. · Critical Movement . ICU c: O. 77 LOS-El Job No. 10369.00 Date 8/6/1990 .. ..-..... J I J- , I J . " } . (, - East "HI. Street/Otay lakes Road Traffic Study INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILlZA liON CALCUlA liON WORKSHEET Lautioft Northbound . Eastbound J2.~~ . = 0.2.5 SIDO -d a: . I) Jt/. CI ... ~7"'''' ZZZ = o.u 3Cfoo ~ Westbound Southbound 1(;0 :.. o. /1 ,~oo 3Qc.:,_= 0,/3 3000 8- \AI .... () 6' ~ Q) 0 ~ "-- ~ ~ 112.30 II a. 13 I ~ 3910 I ,. - ,. I " i J I I I I I I I I I 13e/ ~ 10.2S Ilt2.b5 I I ilZ3 ~ East -H- ST. L_l:_J :d~ ~~: ~2 r;;i rr~ '!_.!.L ~ REAARKS Heer-7erw-a BdclfsrooN! V.sl{,c.. + Acr3 \J\ ~ '" 6' -.J .... S' S' .N · Critical Movement rn leu c 0,7S.. . LoseE] r Job No. 10369.00 Date 8/6/1990 PM PEAK HOUR I. I e- I I I I I I I I I I I I I' I I I I .e ~ .East "H"\'tre.et/Otay lakes Road raffic Study' INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILlZA liON CALCULA liON WORKSHEET &.eca\ton Northbound . Eastbound 1175 +2.22. = 0.2.14 3~O .,; a: . 41) ~ C -J Westbound IZfl~. : 0.2.5 SIOO Southbound ..~ r~ ~ ~ ~~ - / '-i ~I I ~ I JZ30 II 0"3 I .~ 3C)e I 1(P1 = 0./1 1500 3 q 13 . = o. '3 30co " .. , I 381 ~ . I 0.2.5 11/2.('(p I I &/2.3 ~ East -He ST. f._-!:_l :d4 ~~: 3. ~ 2~1 rr~ '!:_L.L ~ U\ " 1\1 " oJ ~ - \J\ I'll · Critical Movement ~ leu I: "f 7$ LOS. 0 kT4 RfMARKS ^,e~,. -7erm 6~(~und u-C!fhc. -f- PM PEAK HOUR Job No. 10369.00 Date 8/6/1990- "w" - I I I I I I . . . ~.' . .-......... - -" . .. ._~~_.._- ~~;._- /" c.~- () East "Hit Street/Otay lakes Road Traffic Study INTERSECTION CAPACITY. UTILIZATION CALCULATION WORKSHEET ~Iioft . Northbound ~75+ Zz.z: (). Z{, ., tfo :> Southbound ~ lIDO :. 0.1/ . /$00 e- Vol ..... 0 6- 6' Q) 0 () -- .. J 38/ ~ ., o.zs 111u,;, I I f/.r-~ ~ L _ ~_1 :d~ ~~l ~ ~ I ~~ *,,"7;= ~ "it 1(. ~ ~_LL_ m <0 a: .. CI ~ Cl .... Eastbound 12~3 = D. z..s 5/00 Westbound '3'S- = 0./3 'oot:) '-i hi I ~ I 1z'3o 110,13 I . . ~ 3~S I lr\ 6"- '" " ...., ~ o \II .1'1 ~ RfAARKS N 831' -7irfYJ ~ [; rocJ ~ -rr .U,c.. -4- AcT- 5 r PM PEAK HOUR East -He ST. · Critical Movement ICU c 0.75 LOS~ ~ Job No. . 10369.00 "Date 8/6/1990 - -- "-. .-. ._"......~.._,_.__..._~.~-~.,......."._..--.". ;. .,."......... , IflS crrr OF c:BlJld J'18TA .PAR77 DlSt:LDSfIM 8'l'A.'rBMBN1' . , .. . . . .' . 'I ~tatem~Dt of dl6c1oaure of certain cwmonblp IDtcrCl1l, plyments, or campaJsn contrJbutJons, on aD matten which wID require cUscretloJW)' action on tbo part of the at)' CouncU, Pkn"l~ Co~fttl.sion. ameS aU other oMdnl bodica.. The foDowmj iDf'ormatJ011 must be disclosed: 1. lbt eo .es or aU ~ JaavJDa . fJDaDcIa1 Jatuest In the COlItraet. Le., contractor, IUbcoDtractor, materia! auppUcr.. . . J<elron '1'it~, CS?rD. ~.""... - . ," L 2. If Ift1 perIOD Jdcnt1Gc=4 pumwlt 10 (1) above Is a eorporatloD or partDerlhJp, Hat the ames or aD . tndfvld\la1J owmng more thaD 10. or the Ihares fa the oozporatJOft or 0WJdn, any partnenhfp tDtercst in the pannel1h1p. ", . L0\11e L. Xeiton - ... , . I - 3. Jf any periOD identified punuam to (1) above II non.profit orpnlzatfon or a trust, Ust the swn~1 of any person Icrvlna .. director of the llon-prof5c orpnizatfon or .1 trustee or bonefldllry or truJtor of the trult... " . . .--. - . '. ... - 5. Have )'OU had more than $%SO worth or business traftlRcted with aD)' mom\'er or die at)' .taU, Boards, CommJnlons, Ccmmltteet and CouncD wfthln the .put lWeJvo months? Ye._ No.1!. If yes. p1easo JndJcatc penon(s): ~ . . " Pleaso Identity each aneS every periOD, tncludJ~ any ..nts. empJQ)'ee., COIlJ1,J]tIJlt. or fndepend 1t contrActors who)'Ou blve usfsncd to repfe.ent you before tho Cit)' m tbIJ matter. Hedenkamp and ~S8ocintee P , D Technologies ~ " 4. .. . .. . 6. ,.. Have JOu and/or )'Our affJoers or "8rrt1, In the aureaato, oontdtNtod more than $1.000 ~ a. CouncJlm~ber 1ft tho current or preccdlna election period? YeI_ No xx Jf,es. ~to which Co~embet(.): ~ - d . ren~D II ,etbaed II: ~ IIt4II#IduII~tr"", ..1!'ftIII1Ihfp,JoI1tt..... 8111dtylM, It1r:I<<f ,IrIb,lIItrrMlllJllllllitltitm. mONtlon. II/GIe, IIILYtNelltll1, ~tr, tAb II1Id M)I oiJlrr ~ dOt 11II4 ~ cIO\ 'fIJIIItktwtty, 6ttId lit filii" poI/dulM1hdMl/on. ... ""1 otMr ~ IlIf combInotltnt ""'111I . 111III,- . . '" -~ AtuC!llddltJoul plies IS DOCePU)') Xel1:on '.l'1 t J)ate; July 8, 1991 . , . , . . , . . · Mark Kelton. Vice pre.ident Print or type Dame of ccmtrlctor/appUcant . u..n1lL.loh..,. 1M" ~ _ ~~~ iiiiI!ii; ~~~~ """ """ """ """ IfDJ m 00 mow m fn) lJl] . I 8 1991 lEJ THE CI1Y OF CllY OF (HUlA VISTA CJTYCHCOUNCllOFFICES ULA VISTA, CA CHULA VISTA BOARD/COMMISSION/COMMITTEE APPLICATION Please Indicate Your Interest By Checking the Appropriate Line(s) If You Check More Than One Line, Please Prioritize Your Interest _____ Board of Appeals Child Care ......l.. Cmsm on Ag i ng _____ Elderly & Handicapped C1nt _____ Int. Friendship Omsn _____ Montgomery C.P.C. _____ Planning Omsn _____ Town Centre Proj. Area Cmt Chula Vista 21 Board of Ethics Civil Service Omsn _____ Design Rev Cmt _ Growth Mgmt. Cmsm _____ Library Board of Trustees _ Otay Valley Proj. Area Cmt Resource Consv Cmsn _____ United Nations Day Cmt UC . CV Charter Review Cultural Arts Economic Dev. -L Hunan Rel. Cmsn Mobilehane Rent Review Cmsm. Parks & Rec Cmsn _ Safety Cmsn Youth Cmsn OTHER PLEASE PRINT CLF..ARLY NAME: ~T.nRTll. RTCK~ HOME ADDRESS: ] 347 R1u~ Falls Drive CITY: Chu1a vista CA ZIP: 91910 RES. PHONE NO. 619-421 -2910 BUS. PHONE NO. 619-422-9236 REGISTERED VOTER IN CHULA VISTA:~ _____ YES NO DO YOU LIVE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF CHULA VISTA? yes YES NO HOW LONG? ?5 YA~'t"'C .Youth Commission Applicants ONLY: School Attending Grade: COLLEGES ATTENDED & DEGREES HELD: {LVlI\Al,: .t'.KU,", ~G1 } PRESENT EMPLOYER: MetrQoo1i tan Area Advisory Committee POSITION: Social Services Coordinator WHAT ARE YOUR PRINCIPAL AREAS OF INTEREST IN OUR CITY GOVERNMENT AND WHAT EXPERIENCE(S) OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE CAN YOU YOU BRING TO THOSE AREAS? 11 yr& of &ooial Ileruj '='9 9xp9r; 9"''''''' w; t-h t-h.,. M....,.. 'Projcl"'t- Work;"'9 t-nWnTd!'l enhancing our service delivery programs, and to also teach the low/moderate income people in the Chula vista community how to become selt-suff~c~ent ana better consumers at tne same ~imQ. I am a P~blio a9arju~ Officer ~or t-hc ~..,., n;cgo HonR;"'9 romm;!'l!'l;nn, also on the Board of Directors for the Fair Housing Council here in San Diego, on the Advisory Committee For the south Bay Un~on School D~str~ct, Year rouna speaKers Dureau tor united way in ~an Dieg< WHAT WOULD YOU HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH BY YOUR PARTICIPATION? To m..1rc pcoplc .,., t-h", l"'nmmnnity b~come more aware of the oroqrams and services that are available to them, and to be a part of the planning process in the C~ty of Chula V~sta. 8/15/91 iliar with the responsibillties assigned to the Board/Commission/Committee on which I wish t DATE * * * PLEASE SEE TIE REVERSE SIDE Of THIS APPLlCATlmI FOR VERY IMPORTANT LEGAL I.FORMT