HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1991/10/22
'b) declare under penalty 01 perjury fna't 1 ..
em,Joye::l by tile City of Chuia Vio:a in the
Office oJ l:H~ City Clerk en:: th3t I posted
tilis AZEn~i,,;r~0ti~e ;>n the Dulle;;n Board ~t
the Public Serv'ces Eu;ldinz'~ at ~ity Hall QII
Tuesday, October 22,1991 DATED. D '0\\ SIGNED"'- \'~",&\, I ~~"
~OO~~ .
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
Resrular MeetinS!: of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAlLED TO ORDER
L
CALL THE ROIl.:
Councilmembers Grasser Horton ~ Malcolm ~ Moore ~ Rindone ~
and Mayor Nader _'
2. PLEDGE OF AlJ.EGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
August 15,1991, October 8,1991 (City Council), October 8,1991
(Joint Meeting City Council/Redevelopment Agency)
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Proclamation commending Mary Etta Houston - Proclamation will be presented by Mayor
Nader to Mary Ena Houston.
b. Proclaiming the Week of October 20, 1991 as 'California Planning Week' - The
proclamation will be presented by Mayor Nader to Robert Leiter, Director of Planning.
c. Presentation of Legislative Certificates of Recognition - Assemblywoman Tricia Hunter of
the 76th District will present Legislative Certificates of Recognition to Mary Jane Diosdado
and Rosemary Resnik of the Chula Vista Police Department for their efforts with Red Ribbon
Week and crime prevention.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 thru 19)
The stllff reconunendntions regarding the following iJems listed under the Consent CalEndnr wi/I be enacted by the
Council by one motion wi1hout discussion unless a Counci1member, a member of the public or City stllff requests
thot the item be pullEd for discussion. lfyou. wish to speak on one of these items, plEase fi/I out a 'ReLpJeSt to
Speak Form' available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complEte the pink form to speak in opposition to the stllff
recommendntion.) Items pullEd from the Consent Cakndnr wi/I be discussed after Public Hearings and Oral
Communicalions. Items pulled by the public wi/I be the first iJems of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Request for City to pay one half of the cost of resurfacing the portion of the private road
"Tennis Court Lane' that is within the City right of way. - Paul E. Hartson, Owner, Bonita
Valley Tennis Club, 3510 Tennis Court Lane, Bonita, CA 91902. Staff recommends that Mr.
Hartson be advised that the area in question is outside the traveled roadway and that it is
City policy to not pave private streets and drives.
Agenda
-2-
October 22, 1991
6. ORDINANCE 2480 AMENDING CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SEcnON 2.05.010 AND
ADDING CHAPTER. 2.CTl TO CREATE THE DEPARTMENf OF
MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SERVICES AND ITS DIRECTOR
(second readin~ and adoption) - At its 9/17/91 meeting, the Council
adopted a resolution amending the FY 1991-92 budget to add 1.25 full-
time equivalent positions of Council Assistant I, II or III to provide services
to the Mayor and City Council. That resolution also transferred $35,600
from the Management Services Department to the City Managers Office in
order to provide the funding for these part-time positions. The funding
from the Management Services Department was based on a staff proposal
to consolidate two management positions in Management Services into one
new position, thus eliminating one position and reducing the salary level
of another. In order to formalize this reduction, the ordinance needs to be
approved. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on second reading
and adoption. (Deputy City Manager Thomson)
7. ORDINANCE 2481 AMENDING THE PLANNED COMMUNlIT DISTRICT REGULATIONS OF
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B TO REZONE 40.8
ACRES FROM RP-8 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED CONCEPT - 8 DISTRICT) TO
RS-7 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY - 7 DISTRICT) (second readinlt: and
adoption) . Condition No. 59 of Tentative Map 88-3 required that lots
within Units 4 and 8 of Residential Planned Concept 8 District be a
minimum of 50 feet in width. By placing the condition on the map, the
lots now meet the standards of the Residential Planned Concept - 7 District
EastLake has requested that the above mentioned units be rezoned
accordingly. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on second reading
and adoption. (Director of Planning)
8. RESOLUTION 16370 APPROVING THREE PARIT CONfRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL
CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE PREPARATION OF A PUBUC
FACIUTIES FINANCING PLAN AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE EIR
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS FOR THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SPA PLAN -Willdan
and Associates has been selected from among five consultants which
submitted proposals and were interviewed for the Public Facilities
Financing Plan (PFFP). The contract amount of $49,500 will be funded
entirely by the developer, Baldwin Vista Associates. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
9. RESOLUTION 16371 APPROVING, AFTER PUBUC HEARING, RATES FOR COILEcnON AND
DISPOSAL OF SOUD WASTE EFFECI1VE JULY 1, 1991 FOR SENIOR
CITIZENS - At the meeting of 8/13/91, Council adopted a residential and
commercial trash rate resolution which did not specifically address senior
citizen rates. Section 8.24.190 of the Municipal Code requires that senior
citizen rates be set by resolution of the City Council, and the rate
resolution previously passed, to-wit: Resolution No. 16301 did not address
any increase in the senior citizen rate. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (City Attorney)
Agenda
-3-
October 22, 1991
10. RESOLUTION 16372 ACCEPTING FEDERAL UBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUCTION Acr
GRANT FUNDS FOR 1HE EXPANSION OF SPECIFIC UBRARY REFERENCE
RESOURCES, APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND AMENDING 1HE FISCAL
YEAR 1991-92 BUDGET - The Chula Vista Public Library's application for
Major Urban Resource Library (MURL) funds in the amount of$11,426 has
been approved by the California State Library. These federal Library
Services and Construction Act funds are awarded on a per capita
calculation based on the population and funding levels provided by the
United States Department of Education. The funds will be used to
purchase, as well as update, domestic and international business
directories. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Library
Director)
11. RESOLUTION 16373 APPROPRIATING $2,500 FROM 1HE SPAY/NEUTER FUND TO 1HE
COAUTION FOR PET POPULATION CONTROL - On an annual basis, the
Coalition for Pet Population Control (CPPC) declares the month of
November as "Spay/Neuter Your Pet Month." During this month, all area
aniroal control agencies and the Humane Society support the publicizing
of the spay/neuter month through donations towards the campaign. A
donation of $2,500 from the spay/neuter account is recommended to be
made to the CPPC. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief
of Police) 4/5ths vote required.
12. RESOLUTION 16374 AUTIIORIZING 1HE ESTABUSHMENf OF 1HE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTIIORITY - AB 4114
authorizes counties, with the concUrtence of a majority of cities with a
majority of population, to create countywide Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
(AVA) Services Authority. Under AB 4114, such an authority would be
funded via the imposition of a $1.00 per vehicle registration fee increase
for all vehicles registered in the County. This resolution provides for Chula
Vista's conditional endorsement of a San Diego County AVA Service
Authority. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police)
13. RESOLUTION 16375 APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO 1HE AGREEMENT BE1WEEN 1HE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND VISIONS FOR ARCHITEcruRAL SERVICES
FOR 1HE NORMAN PARK CENTER RENOVATION PROJEcr, AND
AUTIIORIZING 1HE MAYOR TO EXEClITE SAID AGREEMENT - On
11/21/89, Council ratified an agreement with Visions for design services
for the revised Norman Park Center Renovation. Funds must be transferred
from the Norman Park construction contingency account to pay for changes
made to the plans, adjustment to the architect's fee, extensions of contract,
and the need for the architect to provide additional services. Staff
recommends Council approve the amendment to the agreement with
Visions for construction-related services for the Norman Park project,
approve the change order to transfer $20,100 to compensate for additional
architectural services, authorize the Mayor to execute the amended
agreement, and approve the resolution. (Director of Parks & Recreation)
Agenda
-4-
October 22, 1991
14. RESOLUTION 16376 APPROVING A JOINr USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TIlE CI1Y OF CHULA
VISTA AND SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TO ALLOW TIlE
CI1Y TO LOCATE A SEWER WITIllN SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC
COMPANY'S EASEMENT - On 7/30/91, Council approved the tentative
subdivision map for Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area III.
Development of this area requires the construction of the south leg of the
Rice Canyon trunk sewer to provide sewer service. The proposed
alignment for the new sewer crosses an existing SDG&E easement. In
order to grant the City rights to construct and maintain the sewer, SDG&E
requires that the City enter into a Joint Use Agreement. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
15. RESOLUTION 16377 APPROVING FIRSf AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RE DEIJVERY OF
EASEMENT DEED AND WAIVING OF SEWER CONNECI1QN FEES FOR 980
FOURrn AVENUE - An easement deed granted by George & Marisol
Villasenor, property owners, is being held in trust until certain conditions
contained in an agreement approved by Council Resolution 16155 are
satisfied. This cannot occur until the Fourth Avenue project is completed.
One of the conditions is for the City to provide connection of the property
at 980 Fourth Avenue to the public sewer system at no cost to the property
owners. The property at 980 Fourth Avenue is for sale, and the Villasenor's
have requested the sewer connection be made as soon as possible. This
resolution will enable the City to install the sewer lateral and record the
easement deed prior to the construction of the Fourth Avenue project.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
16. RESOLUTION 16378 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITI-I RYALS AND ASSOCJATES FOR
ACQUISITION SERVICES IN CONNECI10N WIrn VARIOUS CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS - Several capital improvement
projects are currently budgeted which will require additional right-of-way
for construction. To expedite the acquisition process, staff proposes to
contract for property acquisition services for a period of one year with a
renewable clause for an additional year. Staff has evaluated the proposals
for providing professional acquisition services and recommends that the
City approve the agreement with Ryals and Associates to provide these
services through October 1992 which also includes a renewable clause for
an additional year through October 1993. Staff recommends approval of
the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
17. RESOLUTION 16379 APPROVING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURES FOR COOK ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL PARADE - Cook Elementary School is requesting a temporary
closure of adjacent streets to conduct a parade on 10/31/91. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
18. REPORT PROPOSAL FOR NORMAN PARK CENTER - A MULTI-PURPOSE SENIOR
SERVICE CENTER - The new second story of Norman Park Center will
provide an opportunity to expand the services of the Department's current
senior social service referral program. The Commission on Aging and the
Human Services Council formed a Social Services Subcommittee in
Agenda
19.
REPORT
-5-
October 22, 1991
February 1991 to make recommendations on the use of the second floor for
the senior referral program. The Subcommittee's recommendations are to
pursue a proposal to convert Norman Park Center into a multi-purpose
senior center. A centralization of senior referral services would allow
seniors access to a variety of pertinent services. This report describes the
proposal presented by the Commission on Aging and the Human Services
Council. Staff recommends Council support the proposal for a multi-
purpose Senior Service Center at Norman Park Center and to direct staff
to return with contracts between the City of Chula Vista and the South
County Council on Aging, Senior Adult Services, and Pro Tech. (Director
of Parks & Recreation)
GRANTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) CREDIT FOR RIGHf-OF-
WAY DEDICATION, KELTON PROJECT, SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OTAY
LAKES ROAD AND EAST "H" STREET - At the 8/27/91 meeting, Council
directed staff to prepare a report relative to the applicants request for DIF
credit for right-of-way dedication which was a condition of their
development. Staff was instructed to consider what had been required on
past projects and was directed to include a discussion of impacts which
might result from granting DIF credit for right-of-way dedication. Staff
recommends item be continued. (Director of Public Works) Continued
from the meeting of 9124/91.
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLIJI10NS AND ORDINANCES
The foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as publU: hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please fill out the 'Request to Speak Form' available in the lobby and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Comp/J!te the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five milwtes per individuaL
20.
PUBUC HEARING
ORDINANCE 2482
21.
PUBUC HEARING
REVIEW AND POSSIBLE EXPANSION OF EXISTING TRUCK ROUfES
WI1BIN TIm CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA. Review of existing truck routes by
staff show a revision of the present routes is necessary to complement the
changes and expansion of the City. Revisions to Chula Vista Municipal
Code sections 10.64.010 and 10.64.040 are also needed. Staff recommends
Council place ordinance on fIrst reading. (Director of Public Works)
AMENDING SECIlONS 10.64.010 AND 10.64.040 OF TIm CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ITIROUGH TRUCK ROUfES (fIrst
readin~)
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 90-1 (SALT CREEK 1) - On 9117/91,
Council adopted the resolution of intention to order acquisition and
fInancing of certain infrastructure serving the Salt Creek I development
pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and set a public
hearing for 10/22/91 for the purpose of hearing public testimony. All
owners of property within the proposed assessment district have been
Agenda
-6-
October 22, 1991
mailed a notice of the public hearing including the proposed assessment
to their land. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Director of
Public Works)
A. RESOLUTION 16380 ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO TIlE
ENGINEER'S "REPORT"IN ASSESSMENT DISfRlCf NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK
I)
B. RESOLUTION 16381 APPROVING AGREEMENTS FOR ASSESSMENT DISfRlCf NO. 90-1 (SALT
CREEK I).
C. RESOLUTION 16382 CONFIRMING TIlE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING TIlE IMPROVEMENTS
MADE, TOGETHER WIlli APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING TIlE
ENGINEER'S "REPORT"IN ASSESSMENTDISfRlCf NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK
I).
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportuni1.y for the genoal public to address the City Council 011 any subject matter within the Cowu;jJ's
jurisdiction that is !!Q! an item 011 this agenda. (Stale law, however, generally prohibits the City Cowu;jJ from
taking action 011 any issues not im;ludJ!d on the posted agendJJ.) If you wish to address the Cowu;jJ 011 sud1 a
subject, pkase complete the yellow .Request to Speak Under Oral ContnumU:ations Form. available in the lobby
and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prim to the meeting. Tlwse who wish to speak, please give your name and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speakEr.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substanIiaJ discussinns and deliberations by the
Council, stoff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and stoff
recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the aIternalive. Those who wish to speok, please fill out
a .Request to SpeaK' form available in the lobby and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prim to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five minutes.
22. RESOLUTION 16383 ADOPTING A NO PARKING AREA ALONG TIlE NORlli CURBUNE OF "E.
S1'REET BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND THIRD AVENUE - Staff received
requests from area residents to add a two-way left turn lane on "E" Street
to improve traffic flow and safety. In order to accomplish that, parking
needs to be prohibited on the north side of "E" Street. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
23.A. REPORT SURVEY ON CI1Y-WIDE USE OF CONSULTANTS AND CONTRACTIJAL
SERVICES -At the 7/23/91 meeting, Council requested a report on the
City's use of consultants and service contracts. This report represents a
broad review of all existing contracts for services required city-
wide,regardless of contract costs. In addition, several recommendations for
further study are requested to be formally referred to the City Manager.
Staff recommends acceptance of the report, approval of the referrals
recommended, and further direction provided as necessary. (City Manager)
Continued from the meeting of 8/20/91 and 10/1/01.
Agenda
-7-
October 22, 1991
CONTRACTIJALlCONSULTANT SERVICES PROVIDERS WHO EARNED
$50,000 OR MORE IN ANY ONE FISCAL YEAR (FISCAL YEAR 1985-86 TO
FISCAL YEAR 1990-91) - At the 8/20/91 meeting, Council requested that
staff prepare a listing of those fIrms (Consultants/Contractual Services)
who have received $50,000 or more in any given year since 1985. Also
requested was a brief description of the work completed and the hourly
rate or method of compensation approved in the contract. Staff
recommends acceptance of the report. (Finance Director and Budget
Manager) Continued from the meeting of 10/1/91-
B. REPORT
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the ~ the CiJy Council will consider ilems which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the CiJy's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees-
None submitted.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the ~ the City Council will discuss ilems which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda
iJems pulled at the request of the publit; will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Publit;
comments are limited to five minutes per individual
OTHER BUSINESS
24. CI1Y MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
b. Election of Kenneth G. Larson to International Conference of Building OffIcials Board of
Directors.
25. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
a. Status of American Legion Building.
b. Requesting appropriation of funds for 20th Anniversary celebration - Irapuato.
26. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Moore:
a. Information and Referral Center to be considered for utilization for Museum/Downtown
Manager.
Agenda
-8.
October 22, 1991
b. Council discussion and approval of a new commission to advise Council and staff as pertains
to state mandated air quality. A nTr~ffic Demand Management Commission" discussion
would include, but not limited to, the source of commission membership, numbers of
members, and staff support.
Councilman Malcolm: Council relations and/or setting special meeting to discuss same.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Appointed officials salary negotiations pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on November
5, 1991 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Redevelopment Agency meeting will be held immediately following the City Council meeting.
~evF.,ed
Minutes
October 8, 1991
Page 11
c. Referred to the building being utilized by the Senior Center during the remodeling of the Norman
Park Center and felt it was time to discuss the usage of the building when the Senior's move back in to the
Norman Park Center. It had been mentioned in the past that it could be utilized as the first museum in
Chula Vista. Another suggestion had been made regarding the placement of the Downtown Business
Manager in the building also. He questioned the joint usage of the building by the Downtown Business
Manager and the museum and requested that the item be placed on the next Council agenda for discussion.
d. Stated he had been made aware that the Mayor had formed an ad-hoc task force for reviewing the
permit processing procedures and questioned why this was not brought to Council for ratification. He stated
that anything that required staff time would have to come before the Council and did not believe that the
ad-hoc task force could review the processing procedure without involving staff. It was his understanding
that this was being reviewed by a sub-committee appointed by the Economic Development Commission.
Mayor Nader responded that he had spoken to members of the Economic Development Commission and he
felt comfortable with the formation of the ad-hoc task force. He would have staff check the policy as it was
his understanding that task forces formed by the Mayor did not need ratification, require residency, and any
staff participation was optional. Any recommendations from that task force could only be implemented upon
approval by the Council.
City Manager Goss referred to an advisory group established by the Mayor and stated that he had been asked
to speak and had voluntarily attended. He welcomed some type of forum to provide input to himself and
staff as to what problems people see regarding processing. He did not see this necessarily as a work effort
along the lines as discussed by Councilman Moore but more a group to provide input to himself and his key
staff as to where problems are. He felt there had been overall direction, after the joint meeting with the
Economic Development Commission, and they have an obligation to look at the development process.
Councilman Moore stated that was what Council had voted on and approved, that the Economic
Development Commission, undertasks that they would perform versus the tasks that they recommended that
City pursue, would undertake that element. If Council approves the Economic Development to pursue that,
why would there be a need for a Mayor's ad-hoc task force.
Mayor-Nader responded that he wanted input from a broader variety of business and other elements of the
community. He had been approached by several members of the Economic Development Commission and
had been told that his efforts were desirable.
Councilman Moore stated that with the approval of the task being assigned to the Economic Development
Commission, Council had authorized the staff time to the sub-committee. As long as the Mayor's ad-hoc task
force did not utilize staff time and duplicate those efforts he did not have any concern.
Mayor Nader stated that he had been working with the City Manager and hoped that it was clear that any
request for staff participation was an invitation, as direction would have to be approved by the Council.
Councilman Rindone felt that with the formation of ad-hoc committees that Council should be advised of
the formation and what their charge is. Council wanted to work as a team and it was critical that they be
informed by the Mayor personally. Citizen participation was always welcomed and appreciated but he
expressed concern over the duplication of efforts if Council had already authorized another sub-committee
a task.
Mayor Nader apologized to Council if they had been informed by the newspaper before being notified by
him. Council and citizens are always free to get together with other citizens concerned about any subject
and to seek input and advice.
tiOll~
COMMENDING
MARY ETTA HOUSTON
IN THE' CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, Mary Etta Houstonr a resident of the City of Chula Vista
for the past nine years, obtained a Bachelor of Fine Arts Degree from
Texas Christian University in Fort Worth, Texas and a Masters Degree
from Claremont Graduate Center in Pomona, California; and
WHEREAS, Mary Etta Houston shared her wealth of artistic knowledge
by educating students at San Bernardino Valley College and Gainesville
College in Texas; and
WHEREAS, in 1987 Mary Etta Houston's artistic imagination became
stirred when an olive tree in her front yard was removed and rather
than render the cut pieces of twisted roots and limbs, she stocked the
wood and began her own personal "recycling program" by using the timber
to carve new works of art; and
WHEREAS, Mary Etta Houston's keen interest in our nation's historical
figures inspired her to create a statue of Christopher Columbus and in
October of this year, the San Diego Christopher Columbus Quincentenary
Commission honored her by having this sculpture placed on exhibit during
the SOOth Anniversary Celebration of Christopher Columbus on October 13th
in San Diego:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby COMMEND MARY ETTA HOUSTON for her exemplary artistic
talents and contributions toward the cultural inspiration of this community.
:DaW Mis 22n<t{'t;' JI". October
19 -.!2
J-4~
UJt~or 5' tlie Ci!f!!f C/iufa rista
lf~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Proclamation Recognizing the Week of October 20, 1991, as "California
Planning Week"
Director of Planning ;;1/
City Manager r (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No.1O
The week of October 20, 1991, has been designated by the California Legislature as "California
Planning Week." This designation coincides with the annual conference of the California
Chapter of the American Planning Association, which is being held in Sacramento. It is
requested that the City Council issue a proclamation recognizing "California Planning Week."
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, will accept the proclamation on behalf of the San Diego
Section of the American Planning Association.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached proclamation recognizing the week
of October 20, 1991, as "California Planning Week."
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
(A113.Proo)
1./ h-I
tiOll~
PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF OCTOBER 20 THROUGH OCTOBER 26, 1991 AS
"CALIFORNIA PLANNING WEEK"
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, the week commencing October 20, 1991 has been designated
"California Planning Week" by the California Chapter of the American
Planning Association, and this designation has been recognized by the
State Legislature; and
WHEREAS, the American Planning Association is an organization
dedicated to protecting, promoting and enhancing the quality of life in
counties, cities and towns across the State of California through a
commitment to effective urban, rural and regional planning; and
WHEREAS, The California Chapter of the American Planning Association
has been a leader in planning thought and education through its affiliated
organization, the California Planning Foundation; and
WHEREAS, California planners have long set a national standard for
progressive thought in both design and policy for counties, cities and
regions, incorporating disciplines as broad as architecture, landscape
architecture, engineering, geography, transportation, ecology, historic
preservation, agricultural preservation, the social sciences, and public
administration; and
WHEREAS, the eight California sections comprising the California
Chapter will meet together at the California Chapter, American Planning
Association Conference from October 21 through October 23, 1991 in
Sacramento:
NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby proclaim the week of October 20 through October 26,
1991 as "CALIFORNIA PLANNING WEEKft in the City of Chula Vista and call
upon the citizenry to recognize and participate in the observance of
this worthy occasion.
;DaUtf this 18t\1{~ J/- October 19 ~
_0 /1~~
U?ttyor 5 tk Ctff 5 aura o/"ista
if b- 3
.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM ~
MEETING DATE 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE: Presentation of Legislative Certificates of Recognition
SUBMITTED BY: Assemblywoman Tricia Huntet4/STHS VOTE: YES NO xx
Assemblywoman Tricia Hunter of the 76th District will present
Legislative Certificates of Recognition to Mary Jane Diosdado and
Rosemary Resnik of the Chula Vista Police Department for their
efforts with Red Ribbon Week and crime prevention.
'fG'1
October 18., 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John D. Goss, City Manage~
City Council Meeting of ~ber 22, 1991
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, October 22, 1991. Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as follows:
5a. This is a letter from the Bonita Valley Tennis Club requesting that the
City pay for one half of the cost of resurfacing the portion of the
private road "Tennis Court Lane" that is within the City right-of-way by
Mr. Tom Garibay indicating that the City would maintain that portion of
his private entrance.
The letter sent by Mr. Garibay was sent in error to Mr. Hartson. It has
always been City policy to maintain public streets, but not private roads
and driveways. In situations of this nature, the edge of the pavement on
each side of the driveway extended would determine the public travelway
through a private drive. That is also indicated in the sketch attached by
Mr. Hartson. When his original request was received, Operations Division
indicated the policy to Mr. Hartson verbally as well as Mr. Garibay.
Several times since this letter, Mr. Hartson has requested that the City
maintain the subject portion of his road, and each time has been advised
that the City policy is to not maintain private roads and drives. Each
time he was also advised that the letter was sent to him in error.
.
A field review of the area in question indicates that there are several
other private roads of this nature along Sweetwater Road that were not
paved by the City or County when the road was recently resurfaced. This
is also a similar situation to some of the streets in the Montgomery area.
To participate in this resurfacing would set an expensive precedent for
future maintenance costs throughout the City.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT MR. HARTSON BE ADVISED THAT THE AREA IN QUESTION IS
OUTSIDE THE TRAVELED ROADWAY AND THAT IT IS CITY POLICY TO NOT PAVE
PRIVATE STREETS AND DRIVES.
JDG:mab
trans
COUNCIL REFERRAL
This is a letter from the Bonita Valley Tennis Club requesting that
the city pay for one half of the cost of resurfacing the portion of
the private road "Tennis Court Lane" that is within the city right
of way. The owner, Mr. Paul Hartson attached a letter sent to him
by Mr. Tom Garibay indicating that the City would maintain that
portion of his private entrance.
The letter sent by Mr. Garibay was sent in error to Mr. Hartson.
It has always been city policy to maintain public streets, but not
private roads and driveways. In situations of this nature the edge
of the pavement on each side of the driveway extended would
determine the public travelway through a private drive. That is
also indicated in the sketch attached by Mr. Hartson. When his
original request was received, Operations Division indicated the
policy to Mr. Hartson verbally as well as Mr. Garibay. Several
times since this letter Mr. Hartson has requested that the City
maintain the subject portion of his road, and each time has been
advised that the City policy is to not maintain private roads and
drives. Each time he was also advised that the letter was sent to
him in error.
A field review of the area in question indicates that there are
several other private roads of this nature along Sweetwater Road
that were not paved by the city or County when the road was
recently resurfaced. This is also a similar situation to some of
the streets in the Montgomery area. To participate in this
resurfacing would set an expensive precedence for future
maintenance costs through out the City.
THEREFORE IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT MR. HARTSON BE ADVISED THAT THE
AREA IN QUESTION IS OUTSIDE THE TRAVELED ROADWAY AND THAT IT IS
CITY POLICY TO NOT PAVE PRIVATE STREETS AND DRIVES.
G. SCOTT ASPHALT REPAIRS, INC.
358 TROUSDALE DRIVE
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910
420-1854 I FAX # 420-1859
CONTRACTORS LlC. # 599796 C-12
QUOTATION
4704
To Bonita Vallev Tennis Club
C/o P"ul Hartson
Phone# 475-3111
3510 Tp-nni ~ r.OllT't T .~np
BonitA r.RlifnrniR
9?OO?
Date 2 Oct 1991
We propose to furnish all labor, material and equipment necessary to perform the following items of work, subject to terms and conditions
stated. This quotation expires 30 days from the date above. and good for work compieted by
Job Location
Identified
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
Pri vate Road
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL
, ~, --- ~__ __" ,_..__ '" _" ___h_h ~_ ~_n~~~
I. ~, n M ,,~ ~~ ~- ~---' - ~_.._~
T ___ q: T ""< ,,,,
$ 1,625 00
CONDITIONS:
1. eo. not Include permits, bondI. or any alher torm of englnMring (staklng,telling.
nped:Ion,lIIc.) un.... oIherwIM 1P8C1hd.
2. NO! ...ponsb'- tor aubgrade ~Ion done by anyoM but ou..... In ~
ho.... and fll &real.
3. Recommtr'lCtmlonalor repair, over1aya. ....n;. Me. .,. bind on pal uperiMa and
vilual obMrvatlol'l. Our cplnlonl n no way shOuld be ~ at. formal
Itnglneerlng evaluation.
4. Any unusual conditions or tubloll probIerTa, bLrlld slit>>, underground Wing. traah
deposits, high moisture coolent, etc. cIeemed cauI8 for addaiona1 charQ86.
..
Any .... .. ucavaIe, propMy baN. In(! ftJ*I8 to our Ip8CIfIc8lIonl wll be gvaranleed
bone)'Ml' IUCIP: --.1IbnormaI D.IM 111h8 ClWHtortallUrfi, AI. brolleri water II.....
Our a~_ II limited to the pa1d1 .... and exc1ude11he.... around !he palch.
ASPHALT OVERLAYS, f!'Iough ohn sut:IItantiaI, cannot be g~artll8d" unOeriytng
condltlontCII the origlnallnUllldlon.. ~ ~eIy 1cnoM1.
Mont~ prog,.g ~ upon ~ Ac:countl are cktIIquent Ifter30 days and
they are.ut)tIK:t to the rrulrrun tll'IIrIC8 chaJve allowed by law. (Any artomey lees
attencIent to cnIlectlon to be pIIId rt tuU by cceplo.1.
The ul"lCSMlaned perIOfI&Iy guarame. the obIiQaI:'ion relali1g to Ihit pmpouI.
Required Callornla Prelmnary lien InformaIIori to be provided
..
7.
..
Acceptance: Pi.... sign and mum y.llow copy - thl. quotation constltut..
tM sol. and onlyagreem.nt. Any prior agnl.m.nts, n~otlatlon.
etc. not Nt forth hanlln ar. of no fore. or .H.ct.
Firm
By
Date
By ./i ..^O~ 0 ~
Date 2 Oct 1991
C.V. FAST PFlIN
~nQ....1,..l...
~':i
- --------------p----
--- -- --1L~---- -
; I
--------~-- ---- - - --- -
~___*_ ......j ____u ~
~--Jr- -------- -- - - ~
-------------.---------- ~
~
---_....... .-..---. - -~. -.. ---
- ._..._..~ ~-'-'-"----'---'---"'-------~-"'---~ -.--- ......_-
_. O'.,_u______._u_._ ..__.... ."
_ _ _..._._....~.._m... _.__._~___._._. _~__..__..._____~___,.__.
. -
.
----------~--_.~..- ..
-.. .--. -------" - .. - ---- ,
.. - __ __ _.. _._._ __u'___"__" _ ~__ _ -._ __________~_____.________.
._--_._--------~- .---- ---.- ---.--..---..----..
--...------.---...-----..----
i
~-- ~
o I
.'<.0 Ii
-i---- 1;"-
..-----.-. --. ----~. ---------...-.-
_. ,____.u.,______...._. _.. ...._._.._____ .. ..___"__.__.___
----.--...--.--...-... .--.--------
- .--.-.-.-
__ ___n_________.______.______ _ _._. .______....._._,__ ~
-.-- .------ .-...--..--
_. ...._.__,______.____n.._____.~.____ ......_,~ "_'_~""___
________ff#H/-SC'ctJRT .i. liNE -
I-
i I
_.. ,-. -
- ... ...-.--
m _.. .....
! '
t--;-'-.
__._ n___.~ _
" .. ____... _____m"'
.. - "'-
..~..-. --...--". ..-
.1t)
z.
--_..._-~_._- _ _ ------....---------
7J
._-_. --;;;;(:.--------- -- - -._- ----------------------------
_____---\ _____________________________ n._ _______________________
o
---- ------::v--------------- -.------
:ti 71'\
------73 --------- . --------
.7-
-.~--_. -- -----.-----,.
r-
---- --0--2.,--
:-\
(J) -
- ___.._. _nn_______ ___._._____ _...
_ -.-----.--.------.-.
.-- ~.-._.._.. .__._-~---
.-..-------.-...-.---.
~
_n._.n+_______.+_._____ . __.. ______ . ,___.__.____....._..______.
--- .-.-.--......
I
1
_. ._____n____
....--- _.-
Ju__
--'-- -'-"'-'-"-
~J-= ~
~
____n_n___ i ..
----J --- - ~ ---
- .. ..:t>--
I ..~
2V
~
~
.:-\
..--.-..------.--.--
--- -- ---.-.-.-- ------
- -1 -..--
--
-- .----
.. . ed Letter~ 44'90"'~;~;;""""
.-.-: .. - - - ------- -.. -- --,-
.~1t ~ Speed Letter~ '
o ~..A~ From
. PW. .
Subject
.~~r'
-*"1OFOt.D
,
Signed
..>
REPL:..YJ <! L ~
!~'_l" ~ ~.-
g~!;' ~ .~l,~~ ~7/./ d-L g u~ ~~ ~ t:L
~t (/':::::; :L~;;'~7~. ~
l<"" 1 ~ /51 ~.t,~ <t..) . ~Of..;:'~~
_No OI-D / - "
_NIl tOFOLO
Date
Signed
WilsonJones
GRAYllNE FORM u.eo2 3-f'JfJfT
c.11i163. PRINTED IN U.SA
RECIPIENT -RETAIN WHITE COPY. RETURN PINK COPY
i \
\ \ L1
\ \J
\' ~\~
~ 0\
~;ol\\ c;\.,J\0
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ ...
.-
.
1
i
,
.
,
.
.~
.//'/' .
----------- /' /'
/'/'
---
ff.-
~o~
?~~~
...t1'~ "" .
'. ."':,' .,~ .':'
, '.
.
.
.
\.
'"
'.
{
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
"-
/
!
., \
,,----------"--
. . \
..~ \
\
\
\
\
\
r----l.
I I
I I
I I
I \
"'\' '.
- --1...
.. ~
'.' "'('{
.'
~~~;.
.' "
'-
.
.. ""...-:
."
,,"
..--: '
~ o~ q..
~~~}
--..,
T'''''''''
11.1
~i::::'
-.j ~
..... <:><
I:o! I;;
"::1
c:. ~
'" "'"
'" ~
~ ~
~
~
.tJ\
<::t
~
~
""
<
--.
"<
5WEE7WA7EI<
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \ 1
\ \ t"\? .
\ Of'\\
?l~I'\t )0
\ C;" \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
.....
AVE.
\
\
-----r
\
\
\
r-- --
\
\
- 01>~""
~11~
~~~ '
EO AD
.
....'I"........'....."U1........ .
VI.;:)/A ~
. t;ALlt'UHNIA
92U'n!f~1Q\ t:
n~ ""......~
.
.
3510 Tennis Court Lane
8omta. Cali10mia 92002
, Telephone 475-3111
\)1 olo 1
\TALLEY
~IS C:W'B
12 CUSlom Courts
Large Viewing Patio
aJbhou&e. Lockers and Showers
BaR Machine AvaHable
Comp!ele Pro Shop
Private or Group Instruction
To: City Engineer,: John lippitt
City of ChulaVista
11/24/86
Dear Sir,
.
I am the owner of the Bonita Valley Tennis Club. There are three other residences
who live on our private road, "Tennis Court Lane." We are in the process of drawing up
a new road maintenance agreement and are concerned with the driveway,~, connecting
our 25 ft. wide private road onto Sweetwater Road. It is my understanding that this
intersection is within the recently designatetJ are to be maintained by the City of Chula
Vista. ',!
We feel that 'AoI8 should not have to maintain this area, as almbst every week-end,
the families using the east end of Rohr Park, are parking in this'"sight'area," at the
curbing. . "I-' .
Hopefully, when the new improvements to Rohr Park are completed, there will be
enough parking to relieve us of the continual harrasment of picnicers parking in our park-
ing lot, and of COUl'5e, on our private road "Tennis Court Lane." Our large signs are dis-
regarded, and we do not have the man power to station someone all day )ong to direct
tresspassers away. "Occasionally, we have towed cars away- but that is not an easy
solution. . " . ,
I")
At this time could you give us a letter stating that this area can be maintained
by the City of Chula Vista? If you are able to do this for us, we can proceed with ,our .
-, ~ "~
private road agreement, knowing that we can exclude this frontage approach aI1la fiPm
our responsibility to re-surface, seal, or repair when needed. ,~ ~ ~ ~
I will appreciate whatever you can do for us. N ~ 'i ~
en I c<.
" r' /'<i,'
Respectfullv,_ ~_ \ ~ ~:. t;.~
f~ I-\'\~ .. . Q ~{1"
,P~iul-Hartson475-3111 (1Oam to Spmj N -i:;~
P.S. If a letter could not be sent very soon, could you phone me with ,1oIha~ver a
information you have- soon as possible?, .
c/c to City Mgr. JohllPDsS
"', PEH!gh-
",'
:~ .
"...;'
"
'E.
. ,~!-"-;,;" ,"-
I~, ,.I,' :::- . ;
,. ,,;.,"'. . ,;!i';'~&.~~M~:..,..It;"_~",,..:!dh~~;:J;~";;"" i.i,':;"~"~~<;M';J"'JJI.d, .i[~~'~::LJ ..........__.~.
. _" -_ __ ~. .~...,. . ,..., 1..... \ ,'"'I Ir\.J"NIPI "::1I!U 1tJ'ft'i1Q\ j::Q1.c:n")1
11.iD) ~ @ ~ a w ~ (
I,D r . '"
I I'"
!f n d I II
1;11" OCT' 519'[ II.
i,';:!, I "::J !"!
j-~! f""'/
I ~.~,~.."-'7i:-::J
Bonita Valley Teril1i&-Club . .
3510 Tennis Court Lane '\:'
Bonita, Ca. 91902 %:;-
"
(619) 475-3111 't'>
October 10, 1 991 -:::.
c.f\
R;:"~::IVED
"91 CT 15 P':~~.
: .~.:;~,!~
:.. -(" ~\",
., \'" .~,
...0 :.....
~ "~,' ",
,,__'" \:) u.:.
'(T .\ . \-:>'
<B
~n November 1986 I wrote to the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to ascertain if they would agree to maintain the "sight area",Le.
where our private road "Tennis Court Lane" intersects with Sweetwater
Rd.
Upon receiving an affirmative reply, (see first paragraph of
enclosed letter) I then measured the remaining footage of Tennis Court
Lane, to be split in four equal parts, with each portion to be maintained by
one of the four property owners on our private road.
As this area has not had any maintenance for the seventeen
years since our family constructed our tennis club, I would like your help
at this time. The enclosed bid for a 1" asphalt over-lay from local contrac-
tor G. SCOTT ASPHALT CO. would be a high-quality job that will protect
this deteriorating area for many years to come.
I will be happy to pay one half of the $1,625.00 bid in order to
have the work done as soon as possible, hopefully before the Winter rains.
I will be happy to meet with your Public Works representative
to make an on-sight inspection, and also to inspect the quality of work on
our parking lot, which was just given an "overlay" treatment by Mr. Gerald
Scott and Company.
I am presently expecting a meeting with a Traffic Engineer
from the City of Chula Vista Street Lighting Dept. to cooperate with the
installation of a street light at Sweetwater Rd. and Tennis Court Lane.
This light will greatly assist our 350 members while entering and leaving
the club in the evenings at a particularly dark and hazardous intersection.
Thank you for your consideration.
r...' 0,... r.......
vi:, r ~_.-i-:,.
C'-j"C'--'
j: i ""-~'':
j '.._~.-
The City Council
City of Chula Vista
{"c:
'D0 ;{ ~ Vtrk
~ :>;7~ ('1
0; .1~RlnEN
J,"#~ f7~
Respectfully, ,.-fT-
f~, 1- yt"atU'S01;0
PAUL E. HARTSON
Owner, Bonita Valley Tennis Club
COMMUNICATIONS ~0-2/?1
_.v_,..,..,_,_, __-.,,-,,.
..) r'
., I~
;1; r"'~'
~ eli'
OCT
51991
R~ .... ~!VED
.."',
)j
'~T 15 P
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
3510 Tennis Court Lane
Bonita, Ca. 91902
(619) 475-3111
October 10, 1991
en; OF
(..,,, (, '.
,. ~ ,'. ,"
. : t ....< _'
The City Council
City of Chula Vista
tn November 1986 I wrote to the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to ascertain if they would agree to maintain the "sight area",Le.
where our private road "Tennis Court Lane" intersects with Sweetwater
Rd.
Upon receiving an affirmative reply, (see first paragraph of
enclosed letter) I then measured the remaining footage of Tennis Court
Lane, to be split in four equal parts, with each portion to be maintained by
one of the four property owners on our private road.
As this area has not had any maintenance for the seventeen
years since our family constructed our tennis club, I would like your help
at this time. The enclosed bid for a 1" asphalt over-lay from local contrac-
tor G. SCOTT ASPHALT CO. would be a high-quality job that will protect
this deteriorating area for many years to come.
I will be happy to pay one half of the $1,625.00 bid in order to
have the work done as soon as possible, hopefully before the Winter rains.
I will be happy to meet with your Public Works representative
to make an on-sight inspection, and also to inspect the quality of work on
our parking lot, which was just given an "overlay" treatment by Mr. Gerald
Scott and Company.
I am presently expecting a meeting with a Traffic Engineer
from the City of Chula Vista Street Lighting Dept. to cooperate with the
installation of a street light at Sweetwater Rd. and Tennis Court Lane.
This light will greatly assist our 350 members while entering and leaving
the club in the evenings at a particularly dark and hazardous intersection.
Thank you for your consideration.
cc: f~ul~ rr~o-N
V;' v7 (Z.p~ )./~
- !~ Iv) PAUL E. HARTSON
:;!1 /~ '/ Owner, Bonita Valley Tennis Club
0~7~RlnEN COMMUNICATIONS ~J~~h/
J~"'; J?~ ..54--1
G. SCOTT ASPHALT REPAIRS, INC.
QUOTATION
358 TROUSDALE DRIVE
CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 9191 0
420-1854 I FAX # 420-1859
CONTRACTORS LlC. # 599796 C-12
;1 7
-; .
,
I.;
To
Bonita Vallev Tennis Club
C/o Paul Hartson
Phone# 475-3111
3510 1'E:~nni R r.ollrt L::.np
RonitRr r.AliforniA
92002
Date 2 Oct 1991
We propose to furnish all labor, material and equipment necessary to perform the following items of work, sUbject to terms and conditions
stated. This quotation expires 30 days from the date above, and good for work completed by
Job Location
Identified
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
Private Road
ITEM DESCRIPTION TOTAL
1 ('loan 'T'o~ on" 1 "mn 1" nf' ~n
h. ?1 n ~n h or wo ~
lono I~ 1 h?~ nn
$ 1,625 00
CONDITIONS:
1. Does not include permits, bonds, or any other form of engln98r1ng (staking. testing.
InspectIon, etc.) unleesothefwleespec:ffled.
2. Not f88ponsble lor aubgrade oo~lon done by anyone but ourselves In treoche&.
holes and liB areas.
3. ReoommendaUoo8 for repair. overlays, sealIng, etc. are based on past experience and
....Isual observation. Our opinions In no way shOuld be considered as a formal
engin98r1ng evaluation.
4. Any unusual cond~lons Of subsoil problems, buried slabs, underground pping, trash
deposits, high moisture oontent, etc. deemed cause tor addlUornil charges.
5.
Any area we excavate, properly base, and repave to our specifications wUl be guaranteed
for on. yearexC<<ll where IbnotmaI abuse II the cauaefor failure, as a bfokeri water line.
Our guarmee II limited to the patch "e' and excluclel the area around the patch.
ASPFlAL T OVERLAYS, though often lublstantlal, cannot be guaranteed as underlying
condhlonl of the original Inll8lIatIon .e noI coqJletely knoWil.
Monthly Pf'?Qf811 payments upon ~Ion. Aa:ounts are dellquent after 30 days and
they are lUOf8CI to the maximum finance charge allowed by law. (Any attorney feee
attendent to collection to be paid In full by acceptor).
The und8f8laned perlOnaIIy guarantees the obligation relating to this proposal.
Required California Preliminary Lien Information to be provided.
e.
7.
e.
Acceptance: PINS. .Ign and return yellow copy - this quotation constitutes
the sol. and only agreement. Any prior agreements, negotiations
etc, not Nt forth herein are o' no force or effect.
Firm
By
Date
~
By ./1'A nO.-o 0
-~
~
Date 2 Oct 1991
cy FAST PRINT
GDS: rlr.k
~{f?
~
.......~~
--~- --
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
January 20, 1987
File: LY-067
Mr. Paul Hartson, Owner
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
3510 Tennis Court Lane
Bonita, CA 92002
MAINTENANCE OF PAVEMENT AND PARKING PROBLEMS ON SWEETWATER ROAD AT THE ENTRANCE
TO TENNIS COURT LANE
This is in reponse to your letter dated Novem~ 1986. In that letter you
expressed a concern about the responsibility of the maintenance of the pavement
in Sweetwater Road at Tennis Court Lane. Be advised that the City will be
maintaining the portion of pavement lying within the right-of-way of Sweetwater
Road. The northerly right-of-way line is 50 feet from the centerline and falls
approximately at the midpoint of the berm returns.
Regarding the parking problem you mention in your letter, we are relocating the
"No Parking" sign currently on the north side of Sweetwater Road west of Tennis
Court Lane to the east side. This should discourage picnickers from causing a
sight distance problem for those drivers exiting Tennis Court Lane.
Unfortunately, we have no jurisdiction over parking violators on your private
street or parking lot. One possible solution might be to issue parking
stickers to your members who use the parking lot, then posting signs warning
violators that their vehicles may be towed away.
I hope this letter addressed your concerns. If you have further questions, you
may contact John Hardesty of this office at 691-5115.
~~~
fJOHN P. LIPPITT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
JWH:yc
cc: Cliff Swanson
(B3:SWEET.WTR)
~
i
54- - .3
,-
'.
~ {It-
~
~....................-..
~- -
CIlY OF
(HULA VISTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
January 20, 1987
File: LY-067
"
Mr. Paul Hartson, Owner
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
3510 Tennis Court Lane
Bonita, CA 92002
MAINTENANCE OF PAVEMENT ANO PARKING PROBLEMS ON SWEETWATER ROAD AT THE ENTRANCE
TO TENNIS COURT LANE
This is in reponse to your letter dated Novem~ 1986. In that letter you
expressed a concern about the responsibility of tne maintenance of the pavement
in Sweetwater Road at Tennis Court Lane. Be advised that the City will be
maintaining the portion of pavement lying within the right-of-way of Sweetwater
Road. The northerly right-of-way line is 50 feet from the centerline and falls
approximately at the midpoint of the berm returns.
Regarding the parking problem you mention in your letter, we are relocating the
"No Parking" si gn currently on the north si de of Sweetwater Road west of Tenni s
Court Lane to the east side. This should discourage picnickers from causing a
sight distance problem for those drivers exiting Tennis Court Lane.
Unfortunately, we have no jurisdiction over parking violators on your private
street or parking lot. One possible solution might be to issue parking
stickers to your members who use the parking lot, then posting signs warning
violators that their vehicles may be towed away.
I hope this letter addressed your concerns. If you have further questions, you
may contact John Hardesty of thi s offi ce at 691-5115.
~~4-'
IJOHN P. LIPPITT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
JWH:yc
cc: Cliff Swanson
(B3:SWEET.WTR)
~
,.
.-
-
-' -- ~
J~ ~-
.
(j
~(~
~
~"""'~~
-.,. -~
CITY OF
CHUlA VISfA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
January 20, 1987
File: LY-067
Mr. Paul Hartson, Owner
Bonita Valley Tennis Club
3510 Tennis Court Lane
Bonita, CA 92002
?:-
~
cp
(.n
U1
MAINTENANCE OF PAVEMENT AND PARKING PROBLEMS ON SWEETWATER ROAD AT THE ENTRANCE
TO TENNIS COURT LANE
This is in reponse to your letter dated November 2, 1986. In that letter you
expressed a concern about the responsibility of the maintenance of the pavement
in Sweetwater Road at Tennis Court Lane. Be advised that the City will be
maintaining the portion of pavement lying within the right-of-~ay of Sweetwater
Road. The northerly right-of-way line is 50 feet from the centerline and falls
approximately at the midpoint of the berm returns.
Regarding the parking problem you mention in your letter, we are relocating the
"No Parking" sign currently on the north side of Sweetwater Road west of Tennis
Court Lane to the east side. This should discourage picnickers from causing a
sight distance problem for those drivers exiting Tennis Court Lane.
Unfortunately, we have no Jurisdiction over parking violators on your private
street or parking lot. One possible solution might be to issue parking
stickers to your members who use the parking lot, then posting signs warning
violators that their vehicles may be towed away.
I hope this letter addressed your concerns. If you have further questions, you
may contact John Hardesty of this office at 691-5115.
~~~
fJOHN P. LIPPITT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
JWH:yc
~
C,;.:
<. ,
<=:J
r'l
"
N
""
, '
-i-, ::
fT,
'::-)0.
':' ,-E ~~1
,. ;-= <:
. i... rq
CJ
';'/ ~::
"':.! (I)
cc: Cliff Swanson
-
.. -- --r. /...
/ z~/ =- 'i' ;('" ,- / ~!""_l;c. :..~:. :...c
,I t '_ . ,'_ /.' ,..
," f'"";,, I. ..~:.'.i '~l _,r,.,\. -'If",/...
~. I ,# , ' ''0,-'', \." '- I
(.j..... \ !.. ~ ~... .-.. .....
(B3:SWEET.WTR)
r _
/). '/',' 1 ""....-\ \ :....\
r:.....,I,".;. .. '_..!o. ." .....
;
Rr.;) /-'2-J - v,? . - '"I' LiT _ ' ('" ,t.' .
uJ1 ru '. I\LT0'vt-L / NYJ. J ~ (' it r'
276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010/(6191 691.5021
I
I
,go> ':3
OC
o!!!.5~~
Ct: ~
c:J..-......
~ 0>8"'~ ,..:
I- <'?
~CI)o:e <::
_oc of" (f) 0
"< ~m:e6)' ...J
cal-oT"'"
~ :t:::omS&
c~
~ .g~ -s:.'
\..: [ rL.
Ut. QS
u
V) ~ 0
~
~ <: ~
\7i \11 tl.
~ Q( ~
-:z
'< \U.
\-""
(S
. ,
~ t)
AZ.
~ J- 3/1111 ..1~(1P:J ~I/~$.
~ :t
<(" 0
'3 -
<1
\-
~" "
\11
~ 1
~ . ,~ --'
V) ,
r 0" .
"
~
r Sa. .. 'f
~
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM: ,
r\\Q~ MEETING DATE:~W7/
ITEM TITLE: Ordinan~ #8' Q Amending Chula Vista Municipal Code
Se~r\>-~05.010 and adding Chapter 2.07 to create the
~rtment of Management and Information Services and its
:v '?-~;;:~ctor
c,o~ U.
Sv,; Resolution 1'3~lAmending the FY 1991-92 budget and
Resolutions 16230 and 15824 regarding positions in the Office
of the City Manager and the Department of Management and
Information Services
/o'!
SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City Manager Thomson ]1
REVIEWED BY: City Manageg (4/5ths Vote: YesXNo->
At its September 17, 1991 meeting, the Council adopted a resolution amending the FY
1991-92 budget to add 1.25 full time equivalent positions of Council Assistant I, II, or III
to provide services to the Mayor and City Council. That resolution also transferred
$35,600 from the Management Services Department to the City Manager's Office in order
to provide the funding for these part-time positions. This funding from the Management
Services Department was based on a staff proposal to consolidate two management
positions in Management Services into one new position, thus eliminating one position
and reducing the salary level of another. In order to formalize this reduction, the subject
ordinance and resolution need to be approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council:
(1) Place ordinance on first reading,
(2) Adopt the resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The agenda statements that were considered at the September 17, 1991 Council meeting
regarding the City's budget and Council staffing both discussed a staff proposal to
consolidate two positions in the Management Services Department into one position as
an economy measure. Under this proposal, the existing Deputy City Manager/Director of
Management Services position and the currently vacant Information Systems Manager
position will be consolidated into a new position of Director of Management and
Information Services. The current Deputy City Manager/Director of Management Services
will then fill the currently vacant Deputy City Manager position in the City Manager's office.
(,-1
PAGE2,ITEM ~
MEE11NG DATE: 1019/91
This proposal will eliminate one position in Management Services and reduce the salary
level of the other. The proposal will save approximately $94,000 per year ($74,000 for the
remainder of this fiscal year).
At its September 17 meeting, the Council adopted a resolution amending the FY 1991-92
budget to add 1.25 full time equivalent positions of Council Assistant I, II, or III to provide
services to the Mayor and City Council, and transfer $35,600 from the Management
Services Department to the City Manager's office in order to provide the salaries for these
part-time positions. This funding from the Management Services Department was based
on the assumption that the above proposal to consolidate two Management Services
positions into one position would be implemented.
This report's ordinance and resolution formalize the steps necessary to complete that
implementation. The former position of Deputy City Manager/Director of Management
Services is retitled by the ordinance as Director of Management and Information Services
and maintains the unclassified status for the position. Similarly, the Assistant Director of
Management Services is retitled as Assistant Director of Management and Information
Services. The Department of Management and Information Services is formally
established, replacing the budget control unit and department of Management Services.
Additionally, the FY 1991-92 budget is amended to delete the Information Systems
Manager position. The resolution also amends the executive salary band and fringe
benefit resolutions to reflect the title changes of the Director and Assistant Director, with
the Director position being placed in band E-2, the same salary band that the Director of
Management Services was in before the position was upgraded to the Deputy City
Manager level.
Lastly, the resolution transfers the position of Public Information Coordinator and the
supporting position of Administrative Secretary from the Management and Information
Services Department to the City Manager's Office. The activities of the Public Information
Coordinator have been supervised in the past by the former Deputy City
Manager/Director of Management Services position. It's felt that the activities performed
by the Public Information Coordinator continue to warrant supervision by a Deputy City
Manager or above. The Administrative Secretary position will continue to support the
work of the Public Information Coordinator as well as other staff. In conjunction with the
position transfers, a total of approximately $183,000 will be transferred from the
Management and Information Services Department to the City Manager's Office, said
monies reflecting the total budget of the Public Information Division and the salary related
expenditures associated with the Administrative Secretary position.
FISCAL IMPACT: These proposed changes will save approximately $94,000 per full
fiscal year, and $74,000 for the remainder of this fiscal year. $35,600 of this reduction has
already been transferred to the City Manager's office to provide the salaries for the
Council Assistant positions approved on September 17.
t, --;..
ORDINANCE NO.
d. '8'tJ
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.05.010 AND
ADDING CHAPTER 2.07 TO CREATE THE DEPARTMENT OF
MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SERVICES AND ITS ~OO~\O~
DIRECTOR D\~G ~~O
S~CO~O REN
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does ordain
as follows:
SECTION I: Section 2.05.010
Municipal Code is amended to read:
of
the Chula Vista
Sec. 2.05.010 Unclassified positions established.
In addition to those unclassified positions specifically
delineated in section 500 of the Charter of the City,
there are established the unclassified positions
entitled deputy city manager, assistant to the city
manager, deputy city clerk, assistant fire chief,
assistant director of planning, assistant director of
finance, assistant director of personnel, city engineer,
director of management and information services,
redevelopment coordinator, housing coordinator, transit
coordinator, assistant director of community
development, deputy director of public works/ci ty
engineer, public information coordinator, traffic
engineer, deputy director of public works/operations,
budget manager, revenue manager, assistant director of
management and information services, and assistant
library director.
SECTION II: A new Chapter 2.07 is hereby added to the
Chula Vista Municipal Code to read as follows:
CHAPTER 2.07
MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION SERVICES
DEPARTMENT.
Sec. 2.07.010
Established-purpose.
There is hereby established, pursuant to Charter section
501, a Management and Information Services Department,
which shall have responsibility for the provision of
administrative and technological services, including
citywide data processing, word processing,
telecommunication, and policy analysis and program
evaluation activities, designed to improve the
efficiency and effectiveness of city operations.
-1- 6/J-1
Sec. 2.07.020
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION
Duties and Responsibilities.
The Management and Information Services Department shall
be under the supervision of the Director of Management
and Information Services, which office shall be the
department head in the Unclassified City Service
pursuant to Charter Section 501. The Director of
Management and Information Services shall be appointed
by and shall report to, the City Manager and shall have
the following duties and responsibilities:
A. Appointing employees to all positions provided by
the City Council in the department's buget pursuant
to Charter Section 507 and subject to City Manager
approval.
B. Training, supervising and evaluating the work of
principal subordinates.
C. Coordinating and directing citywide information
system services, including data processing and word
processing services.
D. Managing the City's telephone system and other
telecommunication systems.
E.
Reviewing and prioritizing
thoughout the City.
o",omo"OO
proposals
F. Assisting other ci ty departments in developing new
automation systems to improve the overall
efficiency and effectiveness of city operations.
G. Contracting with other jurisdictions and other
non-ci ty agencies, as appropr iate, to provide data
processing services and managing said contracts.
SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in
full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jim Thomson, Deputy City
Manager
'^- f! 11 ) t.-/ 1
J!1L~ J .~
D. Richard Rudo~t, Assistant
City Attorney-
9309a
-2- 6A"J..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~ 7
Meeting Date 10/8/91
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCM-92-04; Consideration of a rezone
consisting of an amendment to the Planned Community
Regul at ions of Eastlake Greens SPA Pl an to rezone 40.8 acres
within RP-8 (Residential Planned Concept - 8 District) to RS-7
(Residential Single Family - 7 District) - EastLake
Development Company
Ordinance ~/ Amending the Planned Community District
Regul~\1on~ of EastLake Greens SPA plan as shown in Exhibit B
t~t2~ne 40.8 acres from RP-8 (Residential Planned Concept -
~~~. 1strict) to RS-7 (Residential Single Family - 7 District)
~~,Q., ~ 'lj~!
SUBM~u.,-IQj."O': Director of Planning /q,f{/ .
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
On July 18, 1989, the City Council approved Tentative Map 88-3 for EastLake
Greens SPA. One of the conditions (#59) required that the lots within Units 7
and 8 of Resident ia 1 Pl anned Concept 8 Di stri ct be a mi nimum of 50 feet in
width.
In placing the condition on the map, the City effectively changed these l~sto
single-family detached rather than zero lot line or an attached product.
Single-family lots identified within the Planned Community District
Regulations were approved as part of the SPA (see attached development
standards for EastLake Greens Exhibit A).
EastLake Development Company has requested that the zoning for the above
mentioned units be rezoned from the current zoning of RP-8 to RS-7
(Residential Single Family District - 7 District).
The proposal is exempt from envi ronmenta 1 review under Cl ass 5 of the CEQA
guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council concur with the recommendation of the Planning
Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On September 25, 1991, the Planning
Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the amendment in accordance with
Resolution PCM-92-04.
DISCUSSION:
The proposal is to rezone 40.8 acres within the area south of Clubhouse Drive,
east of South Greens View Drive, west of Hunte Parkway and north of Orange
Avenue from Rp.8 (Residential Planned Concept-8) to RS-7 (Residential Single
Family). Exhibits Band C show the specific areas included.
~-,.
, - 7-1
Page Z, Item - J :3 7
Meeting Date 10/8/91
The rationale for the proposed rezone is as follows:
1. Condition'5 of the Tentative Map for Eastlake Greens GPA, 88-3 required
that the lots within units 7 and 8 of the Residential Planned Concept - 8
District be increased to a minimum of 50 feet in width. In placing this
condition on the map, the City effectively modified these lots to
coincide with the RS-7 land use district standards.
2. The rezoning from RP-8 to RS-7 increases the mlnlmum lot area
requirements from 3,000 to 5,000 square feet, increases the lot width
standards from 38 to 50 feet, increases.the lot depth required from 90 to
100 feet, requires a minimum 15 foot rear yard setback and 1 imits the
product type to single family detached house. NOTE: Detached
single-family housing has been planned for all three areas since the
approval of the Eastlake Greens SPA.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
WPC gaZ1 P
~
7~,J
Residentfal Property Develop.ent Standards
,- land Use Groui
RE RS- ""'JUS ....f !!1
1. Lot area (in net OOO's 31
square feet) 8 5 SP SP
- -
2. Lot width (in feet) 70 50 38 SP SP
(attached products in RP - -
district) 2S
3. Lot depth (in feet) 100 100 (RP-B)90 SP SP
(RP-13)50
4. lot coverage (percent) 40 50 SP SP SP
5. Front yard setback:
a) to direct entry garage 20 20 SP SP SP
b) to side entry garage 20 15 SP SP SP
(single story garage in
RS district) 10
6. To main residence 20 20 SP SP SP
7. Side yard setback:
r a) to adjacent residential 15/5 10/52 SP SP SP
lot (min. total/one side)
b) to adjacent 'street 10 10 10 SP SP
(corner lot)
S. Rear yard setback 20 15 SP SP SP
9. Building height. maximum 283 2S3 283 45 45
(2 1/2 story max. RE. RS
& RP dhtricts)
10. Parking spaces per unit 2 2 24 1.5 sp 1.5 sp
(gar.) (gar.) 1 bdrm. 1 bdrm.
unit unit
1 May be reduced for-attached units with Site Plan 2.0 sp 2.0 sp
2 bdrm. 2 bdrm.
approval unit unit
2 RS-7 District only; 13/3 1~ RS-O District 2.5 sp 2.5 sp
- . 3 bdrm. 3 bdrm.
3
May be increased to 35 feet with Site Plan approval unit + unit +
4 Two car garage for RP detached units; one car garage and one carport for
RP attached units
(
. i (3/10/89) 11-4
J:J ..J-?_~ Exhibit A
-
BLANK PAGE
-13-'/7_0/
AS PROPOSED
i
Land Use
Districts
~
'I
RfSICENTIAI.
M-I - ~.....-.DIIIrtI:t
...... - ~ .... ,..., ... ~
-, - ... ..... '- - , -
...... - ... ,.,.... c...t .. . DIIIrtct
...
"" - .. ....... c...e .. . o.tct
1IIC-1' -. Ad c.....4. ... l' DIWtct ...
IIC-I2 - ...c...~ J.JoIII-12 DIiItI:t
-.. ~ ... .........__ .. H DMrtct
-.. - ...---..-
YI..1J(!E CENTER
~-' __-c...._...._
YC-2 ....... c.e. .. 0fIce I*.w:t
_, ------
....
-,
_,
_,
--
-
-
-,
po,
l'J.;:
"
AREAS PROPOSED FOR AMENDMENT
TO PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT
.REGULATlONS . ....
~fASTLAKE
A PWHD CCtoMHTY It' EASII.NCE DEVBOIMNT CQ '3 ~ 7 _ .5"
~~
-.,._~
Exhibit 8
AESIDENTIAI.
...... -
..... -
..., -
..... -
~'J -
ac.." -.
1IIC-22 -
~2' -
- -
AS APPROVED
Land Use
District,,-
~
I .
... I ....
~ ...... .. . CIIIrtd
.kI ..... ,..., .. . o.tI:t
4d ""'''- .. , IIiIIIII'tr;t
~,.,...~-.1IIIrt;t
Ad ........ c.o.t .. . CIII1et
...
~ ~.... J..bIII" " CIIWtct ....
...ea...A1UR-II~
Ad ........., .. II I*Irtet
Ad .......,.., .. .. C*Irtet
YLIJQE CEHmI
I we-' I-c...c.. -.....-
we-. _eooo..__
vc-a __-_-_
.-
01-,
01-.
01-.
-
-
-
01-,
,.,
_ _~ PI.FfIOSE
---,-
--..-
--..-
-----
__-e_
__-e_
-_.,-
---
AREAS AS APPROVED UNDER PLANNED
COMMUNITY DISTRICTS REGULATIONS FOR
EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN .
~EASTLAKE
A PLNHD QC1H.HTY " WILNCE CEVB.OPhINT co. ~ ?~"
rJ~
_._~
Exhibit c
RESOLUTION NO. PCM-92-04
RESOLunON OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL AN
AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED COMMUNITY REGULATIONS
OF EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN TO REZONE 40.8 ACRES
Vfrul1N RP-8 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED CONCEPT-8 DISTRICT)
TO RS-' (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY-' DISTRICT)
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Tentative Map 88-3 for EastLake Greens SPA,
and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions (#59) required that the lots within Units' and 8 of
Residential Planned Concept-8 District be a minimum of SO feet in width, and
WHEREAS, in placing the condition on the map, the City effectively changed these lot
sizes to single-family detached rather than zero lot line or an attached product, and
WHEREAS, EastLake Development Company has requested that the zoning for the
aforementioned units be rezoned from the current zoning of RP-8 to RS-', and
WHEREAS, the proposal is exempt from environmental review under Class S.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT FROM THE FACTS PRESENTED
AT THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends the adoption of an
amendment to EastLake Greens SPA Plan as shown in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part
thereof.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City "Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of September, 1991, by the following vote, to-wit:
A YES: Commissioners Casillas, Fuller, Decker, and Martin
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commi~cioners Tugenberg and Canon
Susan Fuller, Chair
ATrEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary.
~ 7-7
UNAPPROV1m MINUTFS
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MF.FTING OF 9/25/91
ITEM 5.
PUBUC HEARING: PCM-92-04; CONSIDERATION OF A REZONE
CONSISTING OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
REGULATIONS OF EASTLAKE GREENS SPA PLAN TO REZONE 51.5
ACRES WITHIN RP-8 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED CONCEPT - 8 DISTRICI')
TO RS-7 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY - 7 DISTRICI') - EastLake
Development Company
Associate Planner Barbara Reid noted that the applicant had brought staff's attention to the fact
that the far northern parcel had been developed. He asked, and staff agreed, that this portion
be left RP-8 and not be changed to RS-7. If the Planning Commission agreed, the rezone would
be 40.8 acres after the parcel is removed.
Ms. Reid stated that on July 18, 1989, the City Council approved Tentative Map 88-3 for
EastLake Greens. One of the conditions required that the lot within Units 4, 7, and 8 and
Residential Planned Concept - 8 District be a minimum of 50 feet in width. EastLake requested
that zoning for those units be rezoned from the current zoning of RP-8 to RS-7. She noted the
proposal was exempt from environmental review.
Ms. Reid gave staff's rationale for the rezone which would allow side yard setbacks and allow
more of a sense of open space.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing
to speak, the hearing was closed.
MSUC (DeckerlMartin) 4-0 (Commissioners Carson and Tugenberg absent) to recommend that
the City Council amend the Planned Community District Regulations of EastLake Greens SPA
plan as shown in Exhibit B to rezone 40.8 acres from RP-8 (Residential Planned Concept - 8
District) to RS-7 (Residential Single Family - 7 District).
?-'1
ORDINANCE NO.
2481
S<:'c_
U,'VD
li'c/{D
11V<i
4/11b
/{bO
101;.
0/11
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS OF EASTLAKE GREENS SPA
PLAN AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B TO REZONE 40.8
ACRES FROM RP-8 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED CONCEPT -
8 DISTRICT) TO RS-7 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
- 7 DISTRICT)
WHEREAS, on July 18, 1989, the city Council approved, by
adoption of Resolution No. 15200 ("Approving Resolution"), the
tentative map for EastLake Greens commonly known as Tentative Map,
Chula vista Tract No. 88-3 ("Tentative Map"); and
WHEREAS, Condition #59 of said Approving Resolution
requires that residential lots in units Nos. 4 and 8 of said
Tentative Map, as demonstrated in Exhibit B (Exhibit A is omitted),
an area of approximately 40.8 acres, be a minimum of 50 feet in
width; and
WHEREAS, as a result of placing Condition No. 59 on the
approval of said Map, EastLake Development Company, the developer/
applicant ("Developer"), believes that the lots of said units
should more properly be zoned as single-family detached lots rather
than as a planned community development (possibly permitting a zero
lot line or other attached product); and
WHEREAS, Developer has requested that the zoning for the
above mentioned units, unit Nos. 4 and 8, be rezoned from the
current zoning of RP-8 to RS-7 (Residential Single Family District
- 7 District), as more fully defined in the Planned Community
District Regulations, Second Amendment, as contained in the finally
approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan, on file in the office of the
city Clerk; and
WHEREAS, at its September 25, 1991 meeting, the Planning
commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the amendment in
accordance with Resolution PCM-92-04; and
Now, therefore, the City Council of the city of Chula
vista does hereby ordain as follows:
SECTION I: The City Council hereby finds that the
proposed rezoning of said unit Nos. 4 and 8 of aid Map i exempt
from environmental review under Class 5 of the CEQA guidelines,
under the authority of CEQA Regulation section 15305.
SECTION 2: unit Nos. 4 and 8 of said Tentative Map are
hereby rezoned from RP-8 (Residential Planned Concept - 8 District)
to RS-7 (Residential Single Family - 7 District), as more fully
defined in the Planned Community District Regulations, Second
7-11
Amendment, as contained in the finally approved EastLake Greens SPA
Plan, on file in the office of the city Clerk.
SECTION 3: This ordinance shall take effect and be in
full force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
," th~
' .
,1./
I.)~ .
Bruce M. Boogaar , City
Attorney
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
C:\OR\GreensPC
7-1.2.
.,.~\ 0,. i
E~/ft(JI'" 8
LlA'iJldlT 11 .?1f1lrtP-OJ
?-I :J
ffi II,,,,,,,,;.,,,..III!!!IIIIII:.. i
- ---
a.. II = un n n" n: ::==;;;; ;I~ n~ ~
5 iiHHI.i=.iHHH:HH;::;:. i
~!I ! I _~_ I; i
.~ 11....l.........cc......ccccc c.
.- I!
:5 ~ 1< I ~~....-..[. ..
~ li::::~i::.i.ii..ii..:..~.~l.~
S~JI ,i
i:i5
't--....
.::..
1 '
)
,.//
. ..../
.J
-:;f
,I'
1/1
.
I
LU~ JOj ;
I i;:;;i:P::":":iii: i ~Z I~ ~
-~;-! LIJ 6
I~ ~~~~
" ~
. """,...,1
. ~....-:; :::\ \
'--f;
\ ii'
I 'I:
,/ i I.:
,
._---., i'
. '!E .~~ >;;{'
I
.
~I;
~~
! I
t I
!I
~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution )1,37D Approving three party contract for
professional consultant services for the preparation of a
Public Facilities Financing Plan and independent review of the
EIR traffic analysis for the Telegraph Canyon SPA Plan
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
The attached contract is for profess i ona 1 consult i ng servi ces to be provided
by Willdan Associates for the preparation of a Publ ic Facil ities Financing
Plan and independent review of the EIR traffic analysis for Baldwin Vista
Associates' Telegraph Canyon SPA. The developer, Baldwin Vista Associates, is
responsible for funding the entire contract amount of $49,500.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the reso 1 ut i on to approve the contract
and to authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Ba 1 dwi n Vi sta Associ ates has fil ed an Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report, General
Deve 1 opment Pl an and Sect i ona 1 Planni ng Area Pl an i nvo 1 vi ng 350 s i ngl e family
lots on 100 acres located at the northwest quadrant of Telegraph Canyon Road
and future State Route 125. The Growth Management Program requires every SPA
Plan to be accompanied by a Public Facilities Financing Plan. Also, the City
Traffi c Engi neer has requested independent revi ew of the traffi c ana lys is of
the EIR and provision for this is included in the contract.
Willdan Associates was selected after proposals were solicited from 10
consultants with expertise in engineering, planning and public facility
finances. Interviews were then conducted with the five consultants that
submitted proposals in response to the RFP. Selection was based on expertise
in public facility financing and specific knowledge of the City's Growth
Management Program. The selection panel consisted of the City Engineer, the
Director of Finance, the Acting Senior Planner and the Project Planner.
FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the City. The contract
amount of $49,500 will be funded entirely by the developer.
WPC 9878P
~~I
RESOLUTION NO. J 63 7/J
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THREE PARTY CONTRACT FOR
PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES FOR THE
PREPARATION OF A PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING
PLAN AND INDEPENDENT REVIEW OF THE EIR TRAFFIC
ANALYSIS FOR THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SPA PLAN,
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, a agreement for professional consulting services
to be provided by Willdan Associates for the preparation of a
Public Facilities Financing Plan and independent review of the EIR
traffic analysis for Baldwin vista Associates' Telegraph Canyon SPA
has been negotiated; and
WHEREAS, the developer, Baldwin vista Associates, is
responsible to fund the entire contract amount of $49,500.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve the "Agreement for
Consulting Services between the City of Chula Vista, willdan
Associates and Baldwin vista Associates for preparation of a Public
Facilities Financing Plan for the Baldwin/Telegraph Canyon Road
Project", a copy of which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
C:\RS\TC Spa Plan
aJ
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
Bruce M.
Attorney
g~2..
AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
AND BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES FOR PREPARATION OF
A PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN FOR
THE BALDWIN/TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD PROJECT
WHEREAS, the CITY OF CHULA VISTA is in need of
professional services to prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan
(PFFP) for the Baldwin/Telegraph Canyon Road development project;
and
WHEREAS, the CITY OF CHULA VISTA staff distributed a
Request for Proposal to se~eral professional consulting firms with
experience and knowledge of growth management within the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA; and
WHEREAS, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES submitted a proposal and was
subsequently interviewed for possible selection; and
WHEREAS, WILLDAN ASSOCIATES was selected as the most
qualified firm with the concurrence of BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the CITY OF CHULA
VISTA; the firm of WILLDAN ASSOCIATES, a consulting company; and
BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES, do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1.
PARTIES:
The parties to this Agreement are the CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to
as "CITY"); WILLDAN ASSOCIATES, a California corporation
and engineering and planning consulting company
(hereinafter referred to as "CONSULTANT"); and BALDWIN
VISTA ASSOCIATES, a California limited partnership, the
applicant for various discretionary approvals in
conjunction with the BALDWIN/TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
project (hereinafter referred to as "APPLICANT" or
"PROJECT APPLICANT").
II. BALDWIN/TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD PROJECT:
The term "Baldwin/Telegraph Canyon Road Project", as
referred to hereinbelow, means that project on file in
the office of the Director of .Planning located west of
the EastLake Technology Park and north of Telegraph
Canyon Road.
~"3
III. INTENT OF THE PARTIES:
It is the intent of the CITY, CONSULTANT and APPLICANT
that CONSULTANT work solely for the CITY and perform the
tasks outlined in the attached Work Program (Attachments
A and B).
IV. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY:
The CITY shall regularly consult with CONSULTANT for the
purpose of reviewing the progress of the project and to
provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives
of the project. The CITY shall permit access to its
office facilities, files and records by CONSULTANT
throughout the term of the Agreement.
V.
ADMINISTRATION OF CONSULTING AGREEMENT:
The CITY hereby appoints the Director of Planning, or his
designee, as the CITY'S representative in the review and
administration of the work performed by CONSULTANT
pursuant to the terms of CONSULTANT I S scope-of -work.
CONSULTANT and Director of Planning, or his designee,
shall meet as necessary for the purpose of discussing the
project.
VI. OBLIGATIONS OF CONSULTANT:
CITY, pursuant to this Agreement, hereby contracts with
CONSULTANT to act in its behalf dir~ctly and indirectly
and in conjunction with CITY staff in carrying out the
attached Work Program (Attachments A and B) in accordance
with the attached Time Schedule (Attachment C).
VII. OBLIGATIONS OF APPLICANT:
APPLICANT, shall deposit with the CITY the entire
contract amount specified in Paragraph X hereinbelow in
accordance with the following schedule:
A. 50% of the total fee upon the signing of this
Agreement by all parties.
B. 50% within sixty (60) days after the signing of
this Agreement.
VIII.
APPLICANT'S SUBMITTAL OF MATERIALS:
APPLICANT shall provide such information as necessary
pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement
and the attached scope-of-work (Attachment A), and as
further defined in Attachment B.
-2-
~..y
IX.
TERM:
This Agreement shall become effective upon execution by
the Mayor of the CITY, or his designee, and shall
terminate, if not terminated pursuant to the provisions
contained hereinbelow in Paragraphs XIV, XV or XVI, or
otherwise extended by all parties, on June JO, 1992.
X.
COMPENSATION:
The compensation to be paid by CITY to CONSULTANT shall
be on a fixed fee basis in the amount of FORTY-THREE
THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4J, 000.00) which includes
$42,000.00 for the preparation of the PFFP as described
in Attachment A, and $1,000.00 for the traffic review as
described in Attachment B -- and a contingency fee of SIX
THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($6,500.00) for additional
traffic work, if required by the City Traffic Engineer,
for a total contract amount of FORTY-NINE THOUSAND FIVE
HUNDRED DOLLARS ($49,500.00). Work Program elements shall
be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning and in accordance with the Work Program
(Attachments A and B). CITY agrees to pay the total sum
invoiced and approved by the Director of Planning each
month during the duration of this Agreement. All payments
are subject to CITY'S receipt of funds from Applicant
sufficient to pay invoiced amounts. city assumes no
independent duty to pay.
XI.
INTEREST OF CONSULTANT:
CONSULTANT presently has and shall acquire no interest
whatsoever in the Baldwin/Telegraph canyon Road project,
the subject matter of this Agreement, direct or indirect,
which would constitute a conflict of interest or give the
appearance of such conflict. No person having any such
conflict of interest shall be employed or retained by
CONSULTANT under this Agreement. CONSULTANT specifically
certifies that neither CONSULTANT, nor any other person
employed or retained by CONSULTANT, is employed by the
BALDWIN COMPANY. CONSULTANT specifically certifies, in
addition, that no promise of future employment, or other
consideration of any kind, has been made to CONSULTANT or
any employee, agent or representative of CONSULTANT, by
the APPLICANT, any employee, agent or representative of
the APPLICANT, regarding the subj ect matter of this
Agreement or any future project in which APPLICANT has an
interest.
CONSULTANT may not conduct business for third parties
which may be in conflict with CONSULTANT'S
responsibilities under this Agreement. CONSULTANT may not
-J-
'8"-5
solicit any business during the term of this Agreement
which conflict with his/her responsibilities under the
Agreement.
XII. HOLD HARMLESS:
CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
CITY, its elected and appointed officers and employees,
from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost
and expense (including, without limitation, attorneys'
fees) arising out of the negligent conduct of the
CONSULTANT, or any agency or employee, subcontractors or
others in connection with the execution of the work
covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims
arising from the negligence or willful conduct of the
CITY, its officers or employees. CONSULTANT'S
indemnification shall include any and all costs,
expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the
CITY, its officers, agents or employees in defending
against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment
or not. Further, CONSULTANT, at its own expense shall,
upon written request by the CITY, defend any such suit or
action brought against the CITY, its officers, agents or
employees. CONSULTANTS' indemnification of CITY shall not
be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the
CONSULTANT.
No suit shall be brought arising out of this Agreement,
against the CITY, unless a claim has first been presented
in writing and filed with the CITY OF CHULA VISTA and
acted upon by the CITY OF CHULA VISTA in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, the provisions of which are
incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth
herein.
XIII.
INSURANCE:
CONSULTANT shall, throughout the duration of this
Agreement., maintain the following insurance coverages:
A. Commercial General Liability Insurance including
Business Automobile Liability Insurance in the
amount of $1 million combined single limit, which
names the CITY OF CHULA VISTA as additional insured
and is primary to any insurance policy carried by
the CITY.
B. Errors and omissions insurance in the amount of
$250,000.00.
-4-
~.~
C.
statutory
Employer's
applicable
Worker's Compensation
Liability Insurance as
law.
Insurance and
prescr ibed by
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a
Bests' Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet
with the approval of the CITY'S Risk Manager.
CONSULTANT will provide, prior to commencement of the
services required under the Agreement, Certificates of
Insurance for the coverages required in this section,
and, for Commercial Liability Insurance, a policy
endorsement for the CITY as additional insured, and a
policy endorsement stating the CONSULTANT'S insurance is
primary and a policy endorsement stating that the limits
of insurance apply separately to each project away from
premises owned or rented by the CONSULTANT. certificates
of Insurance must also state that each policy may not be
canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice
to the CITY.
,0
XIV. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE:
If, through any cause CONSULTANT shall fail to fulfill in
a timely and proper manner his obligations under this
Agreement, or if CONSULTANT shall violate any of the
covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement,
CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by
giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such termination
and specifying the effective date thereof, at least five
(5) days before the effective date of such termination.
Upon receipt of such notice, CONSULTANT shall stop work.
In that event, all finished or unfinished documents,
data, studies surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other
materials prepared by CONSULTANT shall, at the option of
CITY, become the property of CITY, and CONSULTANT shall
be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation
for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents
and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of
Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable under
Paragraph X hereinabove.
xv. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF CITY:
CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason by giving written notice to CONSULTANT of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at
least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such
termination. Upon receipt of such notice, CONSULTANT
shall stop work. In that event, all finished and
unfinished documents and other materials described in
Paragraph VI hereinabove shall, at the option of CITY,
. -5-
15-1
become CITY'S sole and exclusive property. If the
Agreement is terminated by CITY, as provided in this
Paragraph, CONSULTANT shall be entitled to received just
and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials to the
effective date of such termination. CONSULTANT hereby
expressly waives any and all claims for damages or
compensation arising under this Agreement e~cept as set
forth in Paragraph X hereinabove in the event of such
termination.
XVI. TERMINATION AT THE REOUEST OF APPLICANT:
APPLICANT may terminate APPLICANT'S obligations with
respect to this Agreement at any time and for any reason
by giving written notice to CITY of such intent to
terminate said Agreement and specifying an effective date
of such termination at least thirty (30) days before the
date of termination. In the event that APPLICANT shall
terminate the terms of this Agreement, APPLICANT shall
remain liable for all work undertaken up to and including
the effective date of said stop work order for which CITY
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for satisfactory work performed by
CONSULTANT due and owing pursuant to Paragraph X
hereinabove.
XVI I.
XVIII.
ASSIGNABILITY:
CONSULTANT shall not assign any interest in this
Agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same
(whether by assignment or novation), without prior
written consent of CITY; provided, however, that claims
for money due or to become due to CONSULTANT from CITY
and APPLICANT under this Agreement may be assigned to a
bank, trust company or other financial institution
without such approval. Notice of such assignment or
transfer shall be furnished promptly to CITY. Any
assignment requiring approval may not be further assigned
without CITY approval.
OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF MATERIAL:
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics,
forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement
(collectively "instruments of service") shall be the sole
and exclusive property of the CITY and APPLICANT. No such
materials or properties produced in whole or in part
under this Agreement shall be subject to private use,
copyrights or patent right by CONSULTANT in the United
States or in any other country without the express
-6-
~~g'
written consent of CITY or APPLICANT. CITY or APPLICANT
shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose
(as may be limited by the provisions of the Public
Records Act), distribute and otherwise use, copyright or
patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies,
data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties
produced under this Agreement. Any reuse of any such
instruments of service on any other project without the
prior written consent of CONSULTANT shall be at CITY'S
and/or the APPLICANT'S sole risk and CITY and/or
APPLICANT shall hold harmless and indemnify CONSULTANT
from any suite, loss, cost of defense or liability
resulting therefrom.
XIX. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR:
CITY is interested only in the results obtained, and
contractor shall perform as an independent contractor
with sole control of the manner and means of performing
the services required under this Agreement. CITY
maintains the right only to reject or accept CONSULTANT'S
final work product as each phase of this Agreement is
completed. CONSULTANT and any of CONSULTANT'S agents,
employees or representatives are, for all purposes under
this Agreement, an independent contractor, and shall not
be deemed to be an employee of CITY, and none of them
shall be entitled to any benefits to which CITY employees
are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime,
retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits,
injury leave or other leave benefits.
,
XX. CHANGES:
CITY may, from time to time, require changes in the scope
of the services by CONSULTANT to be performed under this
Agreement. Such changes, including any increase or
decrease in the amount of CONSULTANT'S compensation,
which are mutually agreed upon by CITY, CONSULTANT and
APPLICANT, shall be effective as amendments to this
Agreement only when in writing.
-7-
<6--Cf
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY, CONSULTANT and APPLICANT have
executed this Contract for Planning Services (Agreement) this
day of 1991.
APPROVED AS TO FORM BY:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA:
BY:
BY:
City Attorney
TIM NADER, Mayor
CONSULTANT:
BY: . Ylq, ~eYl/.)GN7'
IN VISTA SSOCIATES,
the Baldwin Company as
General Partner
Attachments
FILES\TELE_CON.DEB
-8-
rg. JI)
ATTACHMENT A
Work Plan
We propose to complete the following tasks and work products:
Task 1: Identify Proiect Characteristics
Identify and describe the proposed development within the project using
information furnished by the City and the developer.
Work Product:
1. Maps and tables depicting the project including a base map to be used
throughout the report.
2. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the project
characteristics.
Task 2: Identify and Describe Facility bnDacts
Identify and describe the overall impacts and, in conjunction with the proposed
SPA phasing plan, identify and describe the phased impacts of the project on
the community in terms of the Growth Management Program, the specific
Facility Master Plans and the Threshold Standards.
Work Product:
1. Summary of overall project impacts by facility.
2. Summary of project impacts by phase.
3. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work
products.
Task 3: Identifv Facility bnDrOyements and Costs
Using the results of Task 2, identify facility improvements needed to maintain
compliance with the adopted Threshold Standards and applicable City
Ordinances for those facilities listed below.
1. Police
2. Fire/Emergency Medical Services (EMS)
3. Schools
4. Libraries
5. Parks and Recreation
Proposal to Prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan/or Ba/dwinlTelegraph Canyon Road Project
8' II
/
Work Plan
6. Water (potable and Reclaimed)
7. Sewer
8. Drainage
9. Traffic/Circulauon
10. Civic Facilities
11. Corporation Yard
12. Open Space Related Facilities and Improvements
For each facility listed above that may overlap project boundaries, the plan will
address the coordination from one project boundary area to another.
Cost estimates furnished by the developer for each facility will be reviewed as
wen as the funding potential for existing deficiencies required by the project
prior to the phasing schedule set forth in the Growth Management Program.
Out-of-area improvements will be assessed for growth inducing impacts and
mitigation measures identified.
Work Product:
1. Table listing facility improvements and corresponding cost estimates.
2. Narrative description of each facility improvement.
3. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work
products.
Task 4: PhasiDl! Schedule for Public Facilitv bnDrovements
Using the results of Tasks 1-3, a phasing schedule will be created that
establishes the timing for the installation or provision of facilities or improve-
ments as they are needed as specified in the Growth Management Program and
to maintain compliance with the adopted Threshold Standards or applicable City
ordinance. The phasing schedule will:
1. Ensure that the project will not utilize more than its share of facility
capacity unless sufficient capacity is ensured for other projects.
2. Include a schedule of development in the area and a cash flow analysis
for financing facilities associated with the project.
3. Provide mitigating measures where demand for facilities may exceed
capacity.
Proposal to Prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan for Baldwin/Telegraph Canyon Road Project
<6" J 2..
Work Plan
Work Product:
1. Identify what and when facility improvements are required.
2. Cash flow analysis of facility financing.
3. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work
products.
Task 5: Financim! Plan
Using the results of Tasks 1-4, a financing plan will be created that identifies
and describes specific methods for funding each facility and improvement and
allocates a proportionate share of the cost to the various properties within the
plan area. In addition, the financing plan will:
1. Identify and describe those facilities and improvements which would
otherwise be imposed as a condition of a development permit or be
provided by the developer in order to establish consistency with the
General Plan, Facility Master Plans, Growth Management Program
Ordinance No. 2448.
2. Review project cash flow analysis from Task 4 to ensure the plan
complies with the finance policies contained in the Growth Management
Program.
3. Identify and describe those facilities for which new funding methods are
required to ensure that sufficient funds are available to construct or
provide facilities when required by the phasing schedule and Threshold
Standards.
4. If the Public Facilities Financing Plan boundaries are larger than the SPA
area, identify and describe those properties within the plan area, other
than the project, and describe how the plan for each property will be
coordinated and facilities funded.
5. Acknowledge that assessment districts requested by the developer shall
not be given credit for facility fees when a facility is constructed above
the established standard or conditions of approval.
Proposal to Prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan for Baldwin/Telegraph Canyon Road Project
~..13
Work Plan
Work Product:
1. Table listing facilities and improvements imposed as a condition of
development or provided by the developer.
2. Cash flow analysis identifying, those facilities which will require new
funding methods to maintain compliance with the Growth Management
Program and Threshold Standards.
3. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work
products.
Task 6: Facilitv Reauirements for Development Proiects
Using the results of Tasks 1-5, a list or schedule will be created that identifies
and describes the facilities and improvements required of individual develop-
ment projects within the plan area.
Work Product:
1. List or schedule that identifies facilities required within the plan area.
2. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work
products.
Task 7: Fiscal Analvsis/Economic Imnact Renort
A Fiscal Analysis/Economic Impact Report will be prepared which identifies
and describes the impacts on the City's capital budget as well as on the
maintenance and operations budget for each proposed phase of development.
The report will also address the project's impact on school districts and water
agencies. It is assumed that the absorption study for the development based on
marketing studies will be provided by the project developer, as agreed to by the
City.
Work Product:
1. Revenue and expenditure impact report of City, School Districts and
Water District.
2. Meet with City staff to distribute, review and agree on the work products.
Proposal to Prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan for BaldwinlTelegraph Canyon Road Project
%"/~
Work Plan
Task 8: Public Facilities Financinl! Plan Preparation
Using the information and work products created in Tasks 1-7, a Public
Facilities Financing Plan will be produced that incorporates all of the task
products in a logical, easy to read, graphically augmented report.
Work Product:
1. Prepare and deliver 43 copies of the Qmf! plan for review by City staff.
2. Meet with City staff to review and discuss the draft plan.
3.
Meet with City staff to review and receive approval of responses to all
City staff comments.
,
4. Prepare and deliver 40 copies of the final plan for consideration by the
Planning Commission and City Council.
Task 9: Proiect Manal!ement
Coordinate and supervise the work of the consulting team and monitor team
progress in completing project tasks and work products. Attend meetings with
staff and prepare a monthly status report by task and budget. Attend up to two
public meetings/hearings.
Work Product:
I. Prepare project status reports monthly which address accomplishments,
identify issues needing resolution, and confirm future target dates for the
completion of tasks, in accordance with the approved project schedule.
2. Meet with the City and developer staff to review and discuss the monthly
status of the project.
3. Attend meetings with staff as necessary. Prepare agenda and follow-up
minutes.
4. Attend up to two public meetings/hearings to present the Public Facilities
Financing Plan.
Proposal to Prepare a Public Facilities Financing Plan for BaldwinlTelegraph Canyon Road Project
<6'I~ /8,,-1,
WILLDANASSOCIATES 0 ENGINEERS& PLANNERS
Professional Consulting Services Since 1964
September 30, 1991
Mr. Steve Griffin
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
ATTACHMENT "B"
Re: Proposal for Review of the Telegraph Canyon Road Project
Dear Steve:
As requested, Willdan Associates is pleased to submit this proposal to review the traffic
impact analysis, prepared by Urban Systems Associates (USA) in connection with the
Telegraph Canyon Road project. Based on discussions with Mr. Hal Rosenberg, City
Traffic Engineer, the following outline reflects our proposed scope of services.
1. Review the study methodology and determine its conformance with the standards and
guidelines adopted by the City of Chula Vista in connection with the Growth
Management Program. This will include a review of the capacity analysis procedures
employed in the USA study.
2. Review the various assumptions utilized in the USA study, including trip generation,
trip distribution and base conditions (projected volumes and assumed geometries).
Where appropriate, identify deficiencies requiring revisions/additional analysis.
Specifically, Willdan Associates will prepare a year 1995 with "approved projects"
forecast with the prepared projects to verify distribution and assignment assumptions
in the project applicant's traffic analysis.
3. Evaluate the adequacy of the street segments and intersections selected for analysis
in the USA study to determine if additional locations, impacted by the proposed
development, should be analyzed.
4. Review the capacity analysis conducted by USA for completeness and accuracy.
Where appropriate, identify deficiencies and required revisions.
5. Evaluate the recommendations and findings of the USA study to determine the
adequacy of the proposed improvements in mitigating the traffic impact of this
development.
6. Prepare a letter report identifying those areas which require additional analysis and
summarizing our conclusions and findings.
JS5\PROPOSA.L\CHUUV~9.LP\Seplember 30, 1991 ~,I" } 1
6363 GREENWICH DRIVE. SUITE 250 . SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92122-3939 . (619) 457-1199 . FAX (619) 452-6680
September 30, 1991
page 2
The above services will be performed for a lump sum fee of $3,000. Of this $3,000,
$2,000 was funded by the Public Facility Financing Plan (PFFP) budget and $1,000 is to
be added to the budget in the agreement for the PFFP. This fee does not include additional
analysis such as model runs, capacity analysis, more than two meetings, and report
preparation. If these services are required, they will be charged on a time and materials
basis with a not-to-exceed fee of $6,500 (assuming one model run and ten study
intersections). We anticipate completing our review of the USA report approximately three
weeks after receipt of authorization to proceed.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of assistance to the City of Chula Vista. Should you
have any questions or require additional information, please call.
Very truly yours,
$:;/~'
George B. Fares, P.E.
Division Manager, Transportation Services
GBF:js
CHULA V-9
copy: Hal Rosenberg
<6. 18'
\\;4i'A' c---;
\ I
\_/'~I
JSSIPROPOSALICHUUV-9LPI0ctober 8.1991
u
i
~
~
<
'i
:;j
~
6
'13
t
~ 8
;:J ~
~ ...
oS
~ ]
11.1 ~
~ .=
j:: e
C>.
III
.-
j
N
....
~
~
'"
00
'5
~
C)
....
::0
I
~
.~
~
oS
~
N
....
....
.... I
.
0 I
....
0\
00
r--
J2
~ I,Q
.,.,
..,.
..... -II
N I
....
-
tI 5 ~ J
!. ] e
e 8- -
III - tI ~ !. ~
0 t;>
6 '.::1 .- ~ e
III .... -
'.::1 '1: .- ~
~ ... 0
C>. S C) oS .-
'1: e e .-
~ ~ - ~ ~
.8 tI
~ C>. ~ -
.c '1: e .- 5
u ~ - .!! Il. i
~ y t;> ::0 ~ .g n
.- ~ .- '.::1
.... ::0 III
I "CI 'Q I >. ]
~ Il. ~ 00 ) ~
J:> J:>J:> I .5 t;>tI II.< -
'.::1 '.::1 '.::1 tI ~ =~ ~ 06 ~
~ ~ ~~ ._.~ ii:l~'s I
.S ~~
_u I).. Il.
~
.>II .... N ..... ..,. .,., I,Q r-- 00 0\
~
~~/q
."
01
.....
01
~
Co
g
U
01
.Q
~
~
'"
.c
'"
<XI
.....
<::
01
e
..c::
U
'"
.....
.....
<
<::
.~
."
01
.Q
.~
S-
U
'"
01
."
ifi
~
>
01 .
S-M
........
UQj
"'01
0.3:
.~'4-
o
U
.~."
.....<::
.....01
'"
S-Qj
.......c::
.....
01
..c::.....
1-'"
-II
'1
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
<7
MEETING DATE: 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution 1'~~lroVing, after public hearing, Rates for
Collection and Disposal of Solid Waste effective
July 1, 1991 for Senior citizens
City Attorney ~
4/5ths Vote: Yes__No X
SUBMITTED BY:
At the meeting of August 13, 1991, the City Council adopted a residential and
commercial trash rate resolution which did not specifically address senior
citizen rates. Section 8.24.190 of the Municipal Code requires that senior
citizen rates be set by resolution of the City Council and the rate resolution
previously passed, to-wit: Resolution No. 16301 did not address any increase in
the senior citizen rate. Senior citizen rates are administered through a color
trash bag system whereby a qualified applicant will purchase from Laidlaw an
approximate six-month supply (one bag per week, or 26 bags) from Laidlaw at the
currently established rate of $40.65 ($41.15 if delivered). The attached
resolution will elevate the authority to charge this rate to a written resolution
of the City Council as required by our Municipal Code. The attached resolution
reflects no increase from the current senior citizen discount rate.
BOARDS/COMMISSION ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the attached resolution articulating the currently charged
senior citizen rate of $40.65 ($41.15 if bags are delivered).
BACKGROUND:
We have previously adopted a reduced recycling fee applicable not only to senior
citizens but also to qualifying low income residents. This recycling fee is
currently set by Ordinance No. 2428 establishing Section 8.24.195 of the
Municipal Code and thereby setting the senior citizen and low income recycling
fee at 75 cents per month.
Some administrative conventions are required to apply the senior citizen discount
for recycling in conjunction with the senior citizen discount for waste removal.
Administratively, Laidlaw charges six months at 75 cents per month or $4.50 at
the time a senior citizen orders a six-month supply of color-coded bags.
As a result of paying this, they are entitled in addition to placing their color-
coded bags along the curbside, place their recycling bins along the curbside at
the same time. They do not use their color-coded bags for the recycling effort.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
C:A 113\srcitrate
9~1
RESOLUTION NO. I" ::J? I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING, AFTER PUBLIC HEARING,
RATES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID
WASTE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1991 FOR SENIOR
CITIZENS
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, in February, 1991, in accordance with the
franchise ordinance, Laidlaw Waste Systems gave the City notice of
intention to apply for a rate increase without specific designation
as to the general rates versus senior citizen rates; and
WHEREAS, the City Council called for a public hearing on
August 13, 1991 of the proposed rate increase; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the City Council adopted
Resolution No. 16301 which established general residential and
commercial rates effective July 1, 1991, but which did not address
senior citizen rate structure; and
WHEREAS, by the first paragraph of section 9 of the
Laidlaw trash franchise ordinance adopted August 3, 1982 as
Ordinance No. 1993, as amended (see Ordinance Nos. 2104, 2332,
2410, 2427, and 2429), the City Council is authorized to "establish
a program for preferential rates for senior citizens or other
classifications which are deemed to be in the public interest"; and
WHEREAS, the City Council by section 8.24.190 of the
Municipal Code established such a program by which senior citizens
age 62 years and over may take advantage of reduced refuse
collection rates by the acquisition of "colored-trash bags" at a
price established by resolution of the City Council; and
WHEREAS, by adoption of this
hereby desires to establish senior
acquisition prices.
resolution, the City Council
citizen colored-trash bag
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby direct, resolve, order and
declare as follows:
1. Persons entitled to the senior citizen discount rate
shall be those persons who are 62 years of age or older living in
a housing unit alone or with one or more other persons, all of
which are 62 years of age or older.
2. Qualified senior citizens shall be entitled to
acquire colored trash bags from the franchised residential trash
hauler upon proof of qualification.
9--3
3. Upon application from a qualified senior citizen, the
franchised residential trash hauler shall charge and the applicant
shall pay for a lot of 26 colored trash bags, the price of $40.65
if acquired from the franchised trash hauler's office or $41.15 if
delivered to the applicant.
4. This resolution shall become effective immediately
upon the passage and adoption hereof.
;L~an;
Bruce M. Booga
C:\RS\srcitrate
city Attorney
9"''1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
ITEM It)
MEETING DATE 10-22-91
Resolution/~7~ccePting federal Library Services
and Construction Act grant funds for the expansion
of specific library reference resources,
appropriating funds and amending the FY 1991-92
budget.
Library Directo~1el-
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
~
City Manage:t<(I'
v'
(4/5ths Vote: Yes-X__No__)
The California State Library has approved the Chula vista Public
Library's application for Major Urban Resource Library (MURL) funds
in the amount of $11,426. These funds will purchase, as well as
update, domestic and international business directories, plus San
Diego area business information resources currently not available
in the Chula vista Public Library.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
Board of Trustees unanimously
application for MURL funds.
On August 7, 1991 the Library
voted to support the Library's
DISCUSSION
Major Urban Resource Library (MURL) funds are available to
libraries serving cities having a population of 100,000 or more.
These libraries must also participate in the California Library
Services Act (CLSA) database and statewide inter-library loan
programs. MURL funds were awarded to the Chula vista Public
Library in FY 1990-91 and were used to purchase business
directories, both regional and foreign, as well as timely business
information affecting the greater San Diego and southern California
area.
As a result, the Chula vista Public Library has acquired materials
on twin plant/maquiladora projects with Mexico, directories that
highlight both product markets and suppliers in the southern
California area, directories which encourage import-export with
foreign countries, especially the Pacific Rim, and books on the
ethics and etiquette on doing business with various foreign
countries. It is the Library's intent to use the 1991-92 MURL
funds to maintain the timeliness and accuracy of this collection
with the very best and latest information available.
//)-/
PAGE 2, ITEM It?
MEETING DATE 10/22/91
FISCAL IMPACT:
Accepting the grant will provide $11,426 to the City's General fund
and this amount will be appropriated to the Library budget for the
purchase of business information sources geared to small business
entrepreneurs, the existing business community, investors and
students.
~~
RESOLUTION NO. J~3'J:l
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING FEDERAL LIBRARY SERVICES
AND CONSTRUCTION ACT GRANT FUNDS FOR THE
EXPANSION OF SPECIFIC LIBRARY REFERENCE
RESOURCES, APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND AMENDING
THE FY 1991-92 BUDGET
,
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the California State Library has approved the
Chula vista Public Library's application for Major Urban Resource
Library (MURL) funds in the amount of $11,426; and
WHEREAS, these funds will purchase, as well as update,
domestic and international business directories, plus San Diego
area business information resources currently not available in the
Chula vista Public Library; and
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1991, the Library Board of Trustees
unanimously voted to support the Library's application for MURL
funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby accept Federal Library Services
and Construction grant funds for the expansion of specific Library
reference resources.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the FY 1991-92 budget is
amended by appropriating $11,426 from the General Fund into Account
100-1628. The funds will be received in the City's General Fund
Account 100-3654.
Presented by
Rosemary Lane, Library Director
C:\RS\MURL grant
ItJ-;J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / I
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution 1/'3?.J-
Spay/Neuter Fund
Population Cofttrol
IYIi l
Chief of P~
City Managerz/
Appropriating $2,500 from the
to the Coalition for Pet
SUBMITTED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes X No
REVIEWED BY:
On an annual basis, the Coalition for Pet Population Control (CPPC)
declares the month of November as "Spay/Neuter Your Pet Month."
During this month all area Animal Control Agencies and Humane
Societies support the publicizing of the spay/neuter month by
donating money towards the campaign. A donation of $2,500 is
recommended to be given to CPPC from the spay/neuter account.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the Resolution
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
The over-population of pets is an ongoing problem. By educating
the public about the availability and benefits of spaying/neutering
their pets, we hope to reduce the number of animals which must be
destroyed each year.
November of 1990 proved to be a very successful spay/neuter month.
In Chula vista we held an open house at the Animal Shelter
Facility. In addition, local DVM Adena Boxer conducted a seminar
on spaying and neutering at the library, mailed flyers and assisted
in staffing of the San Diego County's spay/neuter hotline.
The funds proposed for this year to be donated to the Coalition for
Pet population Control will be used to fund the information hotline
and advertisements during the November campaign. Also during
November some veterinarians will be offering reduced rates for
spay/neutering. The proposed use of these funds are consistent
with spay/neuter account expenditure guidelines.
San Diego county is donating $45,000 to this program and they are
requesting donations from all other cities in the County. There is
no specific budget for this program but all funds obtained will be
used for public education of the public.
FISCAL IMPACT: Expenditure of $2,500
Spay/Neuter Account.
approximately $21,000
account at this time.
from the
There is
in this
1/-1
RESOLUTION NO.
1~3')3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $2,500 FROM THE
SPAY /NEUTER FUND TO THE COALITION FOR PET
POPULATION CONTROL
The city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on an annual basis,
population Control (CPPC) declares the
"Spay/Neuter Your Pet Month"; and
the Coalition for Pet
month of November as
WHEREAS, during this month all area Animal
Agencies and Human Societies support the publicizing
spay/neuter month by donating money towards the campaign;
Control
of the
and
WHEREAS, a donation of $2,5000 is recommended to be given
to CPPC from the spay/neuter account.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby appropriate $2,500 from the
spay/Neuter Fund to the Coalition for Pet Population Control to be
held in trust by them and used for the purposes of publicizing
spay/Neuter Month or to otherwise educate the public on the social
benefits and humane aspects of spaying and neutering dogs and cats.
C:\RS\Spayjneuter
Presented by
William J. winters, Chief of
Police
11--:3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I J...
SUBMITTED BY
Meeting Date 10/22/91
Resolution I ~ 3 ? i endorsing the establishment, under AB
4114, of a San Diego County Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
Service Authority.
Chief of pm!..;)
-;:}
City Managerzf (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
ITEM TITLE
REVIEWED BY
AB 4114 authorizes counties, with the concurrence of a majority of the cities with a majority
of the incorporated population, to create countywide Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service
Authorities for abandoned vehicle abatement. Under AB 4114, such Authority's would be
funded via the imposition of a $1.00 per vehicle registration fee increase for all registered
vehicle in the county. The County of San Diego has been pursuing the creation of such a
Service Authority since mid-July. Staff has worked cooperatively with consultants retained by
the county (TECHPLAN) and with other cities in throughout the county. This resolution
provides for Chula Vista's conditional endorsement of the creation of a San Diego County
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (A VASA).
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
The County of San Diego has proposed that the City of Chula Vista adopt a resolution to
endorse the establishment of a San Diego County A VASA and impose a one dollar vehicle
registration fee increase to fund the A VASA. The proposed A VASA and one dollar fee would
commence on January 1, 1992. The legislation contains a five year sunset provision. This
proposal is pursuant to Assembly Bill 4114 which, effective January I, 1991, added Section
22710 to the California Vehicle Code. C.V.C. Section 22710 provides the authority for a
county to create, with the concurrence of a majority of the cities with a majority of the
incorporated population, a countywide A VASA (this requirement has the effect, in San Diego
County, of requiring participation by the City of San Diego). Section 2271O.c.2 of the Vehicle
Code states that revenue received by an A VASA must be allocated to abandoned vehicle
abatement programs. Therefore, the funds can only be used for removing abandoned, wrecked,
dismantled or otherwise inoperable vehicles from private or public property. The formation of
a San Diego County A VASA would provide reimbursement for Chula Vista's existing abandoned
vehicle abatement programs. If a San Diego County A VASA is formed, it will be governed
IJ..,/
Page 2,
Item J:l..
Meeting Date 10/22/91
by an Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and Plan.
A majority of cities including a majority of the incorporated population have passed a resolution
endorsing the formation of a San Diego A VASA under the Program and Plan developed by
TECHPLAN. In other words, the statute's concurrence thresholds have been met. However,
according to the 1990 Census data used by TECHPLAN, the City of San Diego, has 52.9% of
the incorporated population of the county. Therefore, the effect of C. V.C. 2271O's concurrence
thresholds is that the City of San Diego will, by virtue of its population, determine whether or
not the proposed A VASA will be formed. The City of San Diego has approved a resolution
conditionally approving the formation of the proposed A VASA. Please note that should the City
of San Diego rescind its support, the proposed A VASA will not meet statutory concurrence
thresholds and, therefore, will not be formed.
The proposed A VASA Program and Plan provides for reimbursement to cities on a population
pro rata share methodology. Based upon this method, the City of Chula Vista would receive
approximately $102,000 in abatement reimbursement revenue after deducting fees paid to state
agencies and the A VASA for various administrative, collection and handling fees. This A VASA
reimbursement revenue would offset approximately $149,000 in General Fund costs currently
incurred by the Building and Housing and Police departments in their abandoned vehicle
abatement efforts.
Staffs recommendation to endorse the formation of, and thereby participate in, a San Diego
County A VASA is contingent upon acceptance of the proposed Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
Program and Plan. Included in the proposed Program and Plan is a condition that any excess
reimbursement funds accrued by Chula Vista shall remain in the City's account and roll over
year-to-year, not returned to a countywide pool. Additional conditions Staff is endorsing
include:
1. The A VASA shall not mandate a level of abatement services that is beyond the level
currently being provided by the Building and Housing and Police departments.
2. In the event that the proceeds are distributed, in whole or in part, on the basis of
impound activity within a given political or geographic boundary, that reimbursement to
Chula Vista shall be allowed for: a) vehicles impounded for violation of the City's 72
hour parking regulations or any other type of parking violations; or, b) for costs related
to any vehicles abated from private property.
3. In the event that reimbursement is conditioned on impound activity verification, the City
of Chula Vista shall be entitled to reimbursement for staffing and equipment expenditures
related thereto.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $102,000 in reimbursement revenue annually, to be paid
quarterly, upon Program implementation. Program implementation target
date: January 1, 1992.
/,).-~
RESOLUTION NO. 16374
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AUTHORIZING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SAN DIEGO
ABANDONED VEHICLE ABATEMENT SERVICE AUTHORITY
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, Section 22710 of the California Vehicle Code provides for the
establ i shment of a Servi ce Authority for abandoned Vehi cl e Abatement and
imposition of a $1.00 vehicle registration fee if the Board of Supervisors of the
County, by a two-thirds vote, and a majority of cities within the County having
a majority of the incorporated population, adopt resolutions providing for the
establishment of the authority and the imposition of the fee; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that an organized program for the
abatement, removal and disposal of abandoned, wrecked, dismantled and otherwise
inoperative vehicles is needed to protect the health and safety of citizens; and,
WHEREAS, Section 22710 of the California Vehicle Code provides for
membership of the Service Authority to be determined by a concurrence of the
Board of Supervisors and a majority vote of the majority of cities within the
County having a majority of the incorporated population.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista that:
A. Pursuant to Section 22710 of the California Vehicle Code requiring a
majority of cities within the County having a majority of the incorporated
popul ati on to announce thei r support as a condi ti on precedent to the
formation of an Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority (AVASA), the
City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby announce their support
for the formation of the San Diego Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service
Authority pursuant to the proposed Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Program and
Pl an as prepared by TECH PLAN Corporati on, dated September 9, 1991, as
modified by the below conditions, and the $1.00 vehicle registration fee
to be imposed in San Diego County pursuant to Cal ifornia Vehicle Code
Section 22710, on the following conditions:
1. The AVASA shall not mandate a level of abatement services that is
beyond the level currently being provided by the Building and
Housing and Police Departments.
2. Any excess reimbursement funds accrued by Chula Vista shall remain
in the City's account and rollover year-to-year, not returned to a
countywide pool.
3. In the event that the proceeds are distributed, in whole or in part
on the basis of impound activity within a given political/geographic
boundary, that reimbursement to Chula Vista shall be allowed for (a)
1.2.-3
vehicles impounded for violation of the City's 72 hour parking
regulations, or any other type of parking violations; (b) for costs
related to any vehicles abated from private property.
4. In the event that reimbursement is conditioned on impound activity
verification, the City of Chula Vista shall be entitled to
reimbursement for staffing or equipment expenditures.
Failing said conditions, the City of Chula Vista does not support
the formation of the San Diego Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service
Authority or the $1.00 vehicle registration fee.
5. Notwithstanding the failure of the City of Chula Vista's support and
consent according to the terms herein provided, in the event that a
Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority is formed, the City of
Chula Vista shall be a member and participant thereof.
Presented by Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
William J. Winters
Chief of Police
2
J:J.-tj
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
13
10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution '(..'315 extending the agreement
between the city council of the City of Chula vista
and Visions; providing for architectural services
for the Norman Park Center Renovation Project
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Parks and
City Managr
R t' ,jjj"rJJ'
ecrea l.on'1'
REVIEWED BY:
(4/sths Vote: Yes___No~)
At the August 23, 1988 Council meeting, the City Council approved
an agreement with Visions to prepare construction documents for the
Norman Park Center Renovation. Construction documents were
prepared and submitted for plan check.
However, a decision was made by City Council on October 26, 1989 to
have the existing architect amend these plans to add a second story
to the building to provide space for senior social service
providers and to have exterior modifications made to the building
to have it more closely resemble the civic Center.
On November 21, 1989, the City Council approved Resolution 15398
which ratified an agreement with Visions for design services for
the revised Norman Park Center Renovation. The approved agreement
provided contingency language for "additional services" which may
have been necessary as the project progressed; and also provided
for time extensions for delays beyond the Architect's control.
This Council action approves an extension of the existing agreement
with the architect, Visions.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the extension to
the agreement with Visions for construction-related services for
the Norman Park project.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: When the City Council approved the agreement with
Visions for design services for the revised Norman Park Center
renovation; the agreement contained provisions for the architect to
provide certain services. These services included design
development, construction document development, and related
services for the revised two-story Norman Park Center. The
[norpark]
1
I ~, I
Item
Meeting Date
13
10/22/91
agreement with Visions expired on August 31, 1991. The present
agreement therefore, must be extended to cover required services.
Due to the complexity of the project, continued architectural
services will be essential for site observations, response to
requests for information and clarification, and reimbursable
expenses still needed to complete the project.
The original agreement with the architect was for an amount of
$97,185. During the proj ect construction, the architect made
modifications to the second story, per staff request, to move the
location of the chiller unit from the second story to the roof to
provide more workable office space. This request necessitated
major changes to the architectural drawings. staff also made some
changes related to materials (interior fixed furnishings to better
meet the needs of the seniors) which necessitated further
amendments to the construction drawings. These changes cost
$14,568.51, and left staff with insufficient funds for the balance
of the contract.
The agreement with the architect authorizes certain reimbursable
expenses and these expenses have been higher than originally
anticipated, due to the high blueprinting costs for the large sets
of plans. The high blueprinting costs further eroded the amount
available in the budget to pay the architect.
The present agreement with the architect does not include the
architect's review of field requests for clarification and
information in the basic services amount of the contract. As a
result, when they occur, the architect bills the City on an hourly
rate. As a result of this experience with additional uncontrolled
hourly billings, staff has met with the city Attorney and Public
Works Director to establish standard language in all future
agreements that deals with requests for information that occur in
the field.
The architect's purchase order for $97,185 has now been completely
expended and the city presently owes an additional amount of
$16,596.24 for services that still need to be provided under the
agreement. These services include construction observation, site
meetings/inspection by architect, pre-final punch list and final
inspection. These services are stated in Exhibit A to the First
Amendment to the agreement. Staff will be amending the architect's
purchase order to a new amount of $113,781.24.
[norpark]
2
13'2,.
Item ___I~
Meeting Date 10/22/91
At this time, construction has been proceeding for eight months,
and the major structural portion of the project, including framing,
electrical, plumbing, roofing, insulation and dry walling, are near
completion. The next phase will be implementation of the interior
design, with the final phase being landscape installation
surrounding the building.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds available and
previously appropriated, in the Norman Park Center construction
contingency account, to transfer $16,596.24 to the Visions
architectural services account to complete the project.
[norpark]
3
1~,3
RESOLUTION NO.
It~?.r
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND VISIONS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE
NORMAN PARK CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
The city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 21, 1989, the City Council approved
Resolution No. 15398 which ratified an agreement ("Original Design
Agreement") with an architect ("Visions") for design services for
the revised Norman Park Center Renovation; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to extend the original Design
Agreement with Visions to be coterminus with the actual
construction project, and to reach an accord as to compensation
presently due and as to the scope of work and a fixed fee
compensation for services to be performed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Amendment to
the Agreement between the City of Chula vista and Visions providing
for architectural services for Norman Park Center Renovation
Project, a copy of which is on file on the office of the city
Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute the First
Amendment for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $16,596.24 is
hereby transferred from the Norman Park Center Construction
Contingency Account No. 600-6003-PR110 to the Visions Architectural
Services Account to pay for the additional costs and expenses
expected to be incurred in connection with said architectural
services.
C:\RS\Visions
Presented by
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
l~'~
-,
.
--
.
I"
(
'.
.
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY CdUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND VISIONS
FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT. CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT DEVELOPMENT
AND RELATED SERVICES FOR REVISED NORMAN PARK CENTER RENOVATION
THIS 'AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 21st day of November 1989. by and
between the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation,
hereinafter referred- to as .Owner" and Visions, an architectural firm,
hereinafter referred' tci'as--ArcMtect";
. - -- -
~:--:--.\fI TN E SSE T H:
---- ---.---.-------
-- - -
. - - --. -
- ,
WHEREAS~ the OWner lsdesirous of renovating and expanding Norman Park
Center; and
WlfEREAS, the Owner entered into an agreement with the Architect on
October 27, 1987 to prepare a concept plan for Norman Park Center renovation;
and
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency approved the concept plan at its August
2, 1988 meeting, and authorized the development of construction documents; and
WHEREAS. the Owner approved an agreement with the Architect on August 23,
1988, to prepare said construction documents; and
WHEREAS, the Architect has prepared said construction documents for
bidding; and
WHEREAS, the Owner approved making substantial changes to said
construction documents on October 26. 1989, by authorizing the addition of a
second story, to be designed by the Architect; and
WHEREAS. said authorization by the Owner necessitates the negotiation of
a new agreement with the Architect for a schematic design phase, design
development phase, construction document phase and related phases.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties hereto as
follows:
ARTICLE 1 - SERVICES
1.1 DESIGNATED SERVICES
The Architect's Designated Services consist of those services agreed to be
performed directly by the Architect, through the Architect by utilization of
outside services, and by Coordination Services performed by the Architect on
services provided by the Owner, for and necessary to the Project, as
identified and described in the Scope of Designated Services attached, as
Attachment A, to and made a part of this Agreement.
The scope of work includes but is not limited to:
a. Preparation of a concept plan for the revised Center, with the
second story addition, including colored elevation plans, and floor
plans. Plans may require modifications based on Design Review
Committee input.
1~~5
"
-
~
(
.
b. Design development of the approved schematic design which includes
the following: .
Second Floor
~len' s and women's restrooms, conference room, recepti on area,
private office space for two senior providers, open office
space for additional senior providers (to be partitioned
. later). stair and elevator access. storage spaces. cabinetry.
HVAC system. sound system, electrical, lighting and security
systems, sprinkle!:. system. cPl umbing system.
Facade,
exterior
roofing.
windows, doors, outdoor balcony surrounding the
walls, a trellis shading system at glazed walls,
First Floor
Conversion of storage and lounge to new lobby area, new stairs,
one new elevator, interior directional signage, new location
for trophy case, wall rack for brochures near information and
referral, provision of new storage room in Cornell Hall for
five a-foot long chair caddies and two a-foot long table
caddies and the stage, enclosed wall space for bulletins in
lobby area, and window in Recreation Supervisor's office and in
southwest wall of administrative office, redesign of
mechanical, electrical, plumbing systems and structure to
accommodate extra loading, revised facade.
Hi sce 11 aneous
c.
Revised trellis design to coordinate with drop-off area,
exterior signage, new key system planned by the City. new
roofi ng color.
Preparation of a construction document package including plans and
specifications, based on approved design development drawings, which
will include the items listed in Attachment B.
Preparation of final cost' estimates based on final construction
pl ans.
Preparation of plans on City D-Sheet mylars. which will be supplied
to the Architect at no cost.
Plan and specification compliance with City and State codes,
Presentation of concept plan for the revised Center at five public
meetings: the Design Review Committee (2). Parks and Recreation
Commission (1). Commission on Aging (1). Redevelopment Agency (1).
d.
e.
f.
g.
-2-
I ~)'" (,
.
,-
h. Attendance'.at four (4) meetings with staff and members of the ad hoc
committee for further development of the design plans.
1. Coordination with Parks and Recreation Department's landscape
architect with regard to drainage, irrigation, landscaping, driveway
plaza, parking lot improvements, turnout area, and general
improvements.
j. Assistance with bidding of the project, on as~needed basis.
k. Assistance- during construction 'with on-site
interpretation.~f drawings, on as-needed basis.
1. Use of post-construction services for preparation of as-built
drawings.
inspections,
1.2 ADDITIONAL SERVICES
,,-
The following Services are not included as Designated Services unless so
identified in Section 1.1. These Services and any other services
identified as Additional Services in the Scope of Designated Services
attached to and made a part of this Agreement shall be provided if
authorized or confirmed in writing by the Owner and they shall be paid
for by the Owner, as provi ded in thi s Agreement, in addi ti on to the
compensation for Designated Services.
For the Architect's representation beyond, basic services such as
revisions to drawings, specifications or other documents when such
revisions are inconsistent with previous approvals or instructions given;
preparing drawings, specifications and supporting data in connection with
Change Orders to the extent that the adjustment is due to causes not
solely in control of the Architect; providing consultation concerning
replacement of any work damaged by fire or other cause during
construction; providing services made necessary by the default of the
Contractor or major deficiencies in the Contractor's work; provi di ng
representation at agency review meetings; and any other service not
customarily furnished with generally accepted architectural practice;
such services shall be billed at hourly rates described herein.
1.3 TIME
~
1.3.1 The Architect shall perform Designated and Additional Services
as expeditiously as is consistent with professional skill and care and
the orderly progress of the Work. The schedule as listed below shall
include allowances for periods of time required for the Owner's review
and approval of submissions and for approvals of authorities having
juri sdi cti on over the Project. This schedu1 e shall, except for
reasonable cause, be followed by the Architect.
a.
Construction documents shall be submitted for first City review by
January 26, 1990.
(
-3-
l3,1
b. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essense in
completion of this contract. It is difficult to estimate the amount
of damages resulting from delay in performance. The parties have
used their best judgement to arrive at a reasonable amount to
compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the tasks specified in Article 1 within the
allotted time period specified in Article 1.3.1a. shall result in
the following penalty: . For each consecutive calendar day in excess
of the time specified for the completion of the work, the Architect
shall pay to the Owner, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of
$100.00.. ... ...
,-
Time extensions for delays beyond the Architect's control, other
than delays caused by the Owner, shall be requested in writing to
the Director of Parks and Recreation prior to the expiration of the
specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based
upon the effect of del ays to the work and wi 11 not be granted for
delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such
delays did or will delay the progress of the work.
c. All of the services included within this agreement shall be
completed by no later than August 31, 1991, unless the project is
delayed by unforeseeable circumstances through no fault of the
Architect. In the latter event, the Director of Parks and
Recreation is authorized to extend said agreement for a period not
to exceed three months.
ARTICLE 2 - THE OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES
The following responsi"bilities will be undertaken by the Owner, in addition to
those services designated to be performed by the Owner and described in the
Scope of Designated Services attached hereto and made part of this Agreement.
2.1 The Owner shall provide full information regarding the requirements for
the Project. -
2.2 The Owner shall designate, when necessary, a representative authorized to
act in the Owner's behalf with respect to the Project. The Owner or such
authorized representative shall examine the documents submitted by the
Architect and shall render decisions pertaining thereto as expeditiously
as possible, to avoid unreas~nable delay in the progress of the
Architect's services.
~
2.3 If deemed necessary by the Owner and the Architect, the Owner shall
furnish a legal description and a certified land survey of the site,
giving, as applicable, grades and lines of streets, alleys, pavements and
adjoining property; rights of way, restrictions, easements,
encroachments, zoning, deed restrictions, boundaries and contours of the
site; locations and dimensions and complete data pertaining to existing
buildings, other improvements and trees; and full information concerning
available service and utility lines both public and private, above and
below grade, including inverts and depths.
(
-4-
13"8'
ORDINANCE NO. 2481
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS OF EASTLAKE GREENS SPA
PLAN AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT B TO REZONE 40.8
ACRES FROM RP-8 (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED CONCEPT -
8 DISTRICT) TO RS-7 (RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
- 7 DISTRICT)
WHEREAS, on July 18, 1989, the City Council approved, by
adoption of Resolution No. 15200 ("Approving Resolution"), the
tentative map for EastLake Greens commonly known as Tentative Map,
Chula vista Tract No. 88-3 ("Tentative Map"); and,
WHEREAS, Condition No. 59 of said Approving Resolution
requires that residential lots in unit Nos. 4 and 8 of said
Tentative Map, as demonstrated in Exhibit B (Exhibit A is omitted),
an area of approximately 40.4 acres, be a minimum of 50 feet in
width; and
WHEREAS, as a result of placing Condition No. 59 on the
approval of said Map, EastLake Development Company, the developer/
applicant ("Developer"), believes that the lots of said units
should more properly be zoned as single-family detached lots rather
than as a planned community development (possibly permitting a zero
lot line or other attached product); and
WHEREAS, Developer has requested that the zoning for the
above mentioned units, unit Nos. 7 and 8, be rezoned from the
current zoning of RP-8 to RS-7 (Residential Single Family District
- 7 District), as more fully defined in the Planned Community
District Regulations, Second Amendment, as contained in the finally
approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan, on file in the office of the
City Clerk; and
WHEREAS, at its September 25, 1991 meeting, the Planning
Commission voted 4-0 to recommend approval of the amendment in
accordance with Resolution PCM-92-04; and
Now, therefore, the city Council of the City of Chula
vista does hereby ordain as follows:
section 1. The City Council hereby finds that the
proposed rezoning of said unit Nos. 4 and 8 of said Map is exempt
from environmental review under Class 5 of the CEQA guidelines,
under the authority of CEQA Regulation section 15305.
section 2. unit Nos. 4 and 8 of said Tentative Map are
hereby rezoned from RP-8 (Residential Planned Concept - 8 District)
to RS-7 (Residential Single Family - 7 District), as more fully
defined in the Planned Community District Regulations, Second
Amendment, as contained in the finally approved EastLake Greens SPA
Plan, on file in the office of the City Clerk.
\~-~
section 3. This ordinance shall take effect and be in
full force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by
;&dl
Bruce M. Booga
city Attorney
form by
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
e:\greens48.wp
\~..H)
.
2.3 If deemed neces.sary by the Owner and Architect, the Owner shall pay for
the servi ces of soi 1 engi neers or other consul tants when such servi ces
are deemed necessary by the Architect. Such services shall include test
borings, test pits, soil bearing values, percolation tests, air and water
pollution tests, ground corrosion and resistivity tests, including
necessary operation for determining sub-soil. air and water conditions.
with reports and appropriate professional recommendations.
2.4 If deemed necessary by the owner- and -Architect, the Owner shall pay for
structural. -mechanical, -chemical and other labora~ory tests. inspections
and reports as required by law or the Contract Documents.
2.5 The services. information, surveys and reports required by paragraphs 2.2
through 2.4 inclusive shall be furnished at the Owner's expense, and the
Archi tect shall be enti tl ed to rely upon the accuracy and compl eteness
thereof.
2.6 The Owner shall furnish required information and services and shall
render approvals and decisions as expeditiously as possible for the
orderly progress of the Architect's services and of the Work.
ARTICLE 3 - CONSTRUCTION COST
3.1
DEF I NIT! ON
-
3.1.1 The Construction Cost shall be the total cost or estimated cost
to the Owner of all elements of the Project designed or specified by the
Archi tecto
3.1.2 Construction Cost does not include the compensation of the
Architect and the Architect's consultants, the cost of the land.
rights-of-way, or other costs which are the responsibility of the Owner
as provided in Article 2.
3.2 RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION COST
3.2.1. Evaluations of the Owner's Project budget, Statements of
Probable Construction Cost and Detailed Estimates of Construction Cost,
if any. prepared by the Architect. represent the Architect's best
jUdgment as a desi gn professional famili ar with the construction
industry. It is recognized. however. that neither the Architect nor the
Owner has control over the cost of labor. materials or equipment. over
Contractor's methods of determining bid prices, or over competitive
bi ddi ng. market or negoti ating condi tions. Accordingly, the Architect
cannot and does not warrant or represent that bids or negotiated prices
will not vary from the Project budget proposed. established or approved
by the Owner, if any. or from any Statement of Probable Construction Cost
or other cost estimate or evaluation prepared by the Architect.
-5-
(
1~'4
".
.
ARTICLE 4 - REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES
4.1 Reimbursable expenses must be approved in advance by the Owner's
designated representative. Reimbursable Expenses are in addition to the
Compensati on of Desi gnated and Additi onal Services and incl ude actual
expenditures made by the Architect and the Architect's employees and
consultants in the'interest of the Project'for the expenses listed in the
following Subparagraphs:
"
4.1.1 Expense of transportation in connection with the Project at
SO.30/mile; 'and, 'long distance communications in connection with the
Project.
" . -, . . y. . ,--.-.
4.1.2 Expense - of reproductions, postage and handling of Drawings,
Specifications and other documents, excluding reproductions for the
office use of the Architect and the Architect's consultants.
"
4.1.3 Expense of data processing and photographic
techni ques when used in connecti on wi th the producing the
Specifications and Additional Services.
4.1.4 Expense of any additional insurance coverage or limits
including professional liability insurance requested by the City in
excess of that normally carried by the Architect and his consultants.
reproduction
Drawi ngs and
ARTICLE 5 - PAYMENTS TO THE ARCHITECT
--
5.1 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF DESIGNATED SERVICES
5.1.1 Payments for Designated Services shall be made monthly and
shall be in proportion to the work satisfactorily completed by the
Archi teet, on the basi s set forth in Arti cl e 11. For Phase 5 as set
forth in Article 11, the Owner shall retain $5,200 until Owner approval
of construction drawings.
5.2 PAYMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF ADDITIONAL'SERVICES
6.2.1 Payments on account of the Architect's Additional Services and
defined in Paragraph 1.2 and for Reimbursabl e Expenses as defined in
Article 4 shall be made monthly or sooner upon presentation of the
Archi teet's statement of servi ces rendered or expenses incurred, and
approved by the Owner.
5.3 PROJECT SUSPENSIOU
6.3.1 If the Project is suspended or abandoned for more than three
months the Architect shall be compensated for all services performed
prior to receipt of written notice from the Owner of such suspension or
abandonment, together with Reimbursable Expenses then due. If the
Project is resumed after being suspended for more than three months, the
agreement will be renegotiated.
(
-6-
I ~_JD
.
,....-
--
(
".
.
ARTICLE 6 - OWNERSHIP. AND USE OF DOCUMENTS
6.1 Drawings and Specifications as instruments of service are and shall
temafn the property of the Owner whether the Project for which they are
made is executed or not. The Architect shall be permitted to retain
copies, including reproducible mylar copies, of Drawings and
Specifications, and these copies shall be made at the Owner's expense.
The Drawings and Specifications shall not be used on other projects
without the written consent of the Architect.
ARTICLE 7 - TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
7.1 This Agreement may be terminated, in whole or in part, in writing by
either party in the event of substantial failure by the other party to
fulfill its obligations under this agreement through no fault of the
terminating party, provided that no such termination may be effected
unless the other party is given (1) no less than thirty (30) days written
notice (delivered certified mail, return receipt requested) of the intent
to terminate and (2) an opportunity for consultation with the terminating
party prior to termination.
7.2 If termination under (a) is effected by the Owner, the Architect shall be
enti tl ed to payment of the reasonabl e val ue of servi ces rendered and
expenses incurred prior to the termination, in addition to termination
settlement cost reasonably incurred by the Architect relating to
commitments which had become firm prior to termination.
7.3 If termination under (a) is effected by Architect, the Architect shall be
enti tl ed to payment of the reasonabl e val ue of servi ces rendered and
expenses incurred prior to the termination, less any additional costs or
expenses incurred by any damages suffered by the Owner by reason of such
termination.
7.4 Upon receipt of a termination notice pursuant to (a), above, the
Architect shall: (1) promptly discontinue all services affected (unless
the notice directs otherwise), and (2) deliver to the Owner all data,
drawings, reports, sUTmlaries, and such information and materi al s as may
have been intended to be used in report preparation by the Architect, in
performing this agreement, whether completed or in process.
7.5 Upon termination pursuant to (a) above, the Owner may take over the work
and contract with another party to complete the work.
7.6 The rights and remedies of the Owner and the Architect provided in this
clause are in addition to other rights and remedies provided by law or
under this agreement.
ARTICLE 8 - MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
8.1 The Architect shall carry general 1 iability insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000 throughout the duration of the agreement. Evidence of
coverage is to be provi ded by the Architect in the form of certi fi cate
of insurance and policy endorsement. The policy shall provide a written
notice to the Owner of cancellation or material change.
-7-
\ 3. I'
_,; ,0
. . .
&.2 __The Architect agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Owner and its
authorized agents. officers and employees from and against any and all
claims. costs. suits. and damages" including attorney's fees, arising
-from the negligent acts, errors or omissions of the Architect associated
with the project
8.3 The Architect and any of his employees, agents and representatives are
for all purposes under thi s agreement independent contractors an shall
not be deemed to be employees of the Owner and none of them shall be
entitle~ to any benefits which the Owner's employees are entitled.
--f'lcluding but not limited to overtime, retirement benefits. workers'
.compen~a~ion. i~jury le~~~. o~.other benefits.
8.4 The following are designated as representatives of parties to this
agreement:
a. Owner designates the Director of Parks and Recreation as its
representatives in all matters under this contract (except
execution thereof) and all notices given to the Owner shall be so
addressed.
b. Architect designates Richard Friedson of Visions as the
representative under this contract and all notices sent to
Architect shall be addressed to the above designated representative
at 740 Thirteenth Street, Studio 503, San Diego, CA 92101.
~ ARTICLE 9 - SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS
9.1 The Owner and Architect, respectively, bind themselves, their partners,
successors. assigns and legal representatives to the other party to this
agreement and to the partners, successors, assigns and legal
representatives of such other party with respect to all covenants of
this agreement. Neither the Owner nor the Architect shall assign,
sublet or transfer interest in this agreement without written consent of
the other.
ARTICLE 10 - EXTENT OF AGREEr~NT
10.1 Thi s agreement represents the enti re integrated agreement between the
Owner and the Architect and supersedes all prior negotiations,
representati ons or agreements, written or oral. Thi s agreement may be
amended only by written instrument signed by both the Owner's designated
representative and the Architect.
10.2 This agreement shall be in effect from November 21, 1989, to August 31,
1991, in accordance with Article 1.3.1.
ARTICLE 11 - BASIS OF COt~ENSATION
.
The Owner shall compensate the Architect for the Designated Scope of Services
provided, in accordance with Article 5, Payments to the Architect, and the
other terms and conditions of this Agreement as follows:
(
-8-
l '3~ I Z.
.
.
.'
. I~ .
11.1 BASIC COr~ENSAT~ON
11.1.1 FOR DESIGNATED SERVICES AS DESCRIBED IN THE SCOPE OF
DESIGNATED SERVICES ATTACHED HERETO, Compensation shall be based on a
stipulated sum, not to exceed $92,185, excluding additional work and
reimbursable expenses.
11.1.2 Where compensation is based on a Stipulated Sum, payments for
Designated" Services shall be made as provided in Subparagraph 5.1.1, so
that Compensation for each Phase to which such ~'ethod applies shall
equal the following percentages of the total Compensation determined by
~uch Method:
a. PHASE 3," SCHEMATIC DESIGN SERVICES, PHASE 4, DESIGN
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PHASE 5, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
SERVICES: Not to exceed $62,585
b. PHASE 6, BIDDING OR NEGOTIATIONS SERVICES, AS NEEDED: Not to
exceed $5,000
c. PHASE 7, CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES, AS
NEEDED: Not to exceed $20,000*.
* Should construction administration require more than 266
hours, the Archi tect and hi s consul tants shall be
compensated at the rate of $75/hour.
d. PHASE 8, POSTCONSTRUCTION SERVICES AS NEEDED; Not to exceed
$4,600.
11.3 FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES, as listed in Section 1.Z, Compensation shall be
based on hourly billing rates as listed below:
HOURLY BILLING RATES
Principal Architect
Project Architect
Project Designer/Senior Draftsman
Intermediate Draftsman
Junior Draftsman
Administrative Staff
$85/hour
$75/hour
$60/hour
$45/hour
$30/hour
$24/hour
For additional services of consultants, compute one hundred thirty
percent (1.3) times the amount billed to the Architect for such services.
11.4 FOR REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES, as described in Article 4, and any other
items that may apply, a multiple of one-hundred twenty percent (1.2)
times the amounts expended by the Architect, the Architect's employees
and consul tants in the interest of the Project as approved by the
Owner's designated representative, and not to exceed the sum of $5,000.
( -9-
l~,J3
.
.'
.'
. 'J .
11.5 Payments due the Architect and unpaid under this Agreement shall bear
interest from thirty days past the date of the invoice at the rate of
- . 0006~ per day.
11.6 The Owner and the Architect agree in accordance with the Terms and
Conditions of this Agreement that:
11.6.1 IF THE SCOPE of the Project of the Architect's services is
changed materially, the amounts of compensation shall be equitably
adjusted. !
11.6.2,~ IF THE SERVICES covered by this Agreement have not been
completed within twenty-four months'of the date hereof, through no fault
of the Architect, the amounts of compensation, rates and multiples set
forth herein shall be equitably adjusted.
This Agreement entered into as of the day and year first written above.
OWNER:
HULA VISl.
ARCHITECT:
VISIONS
~PRINCIPAL
ARCH ITECT
--
- c ~a a
CITY CLER . 77/ ~
WPC 1407R
-10-
L
l ~../~
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND VISIONS
FOR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT, CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED SERVICES FOR REVISED
NORMAN PARK CENTER RENOVATION
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT is made and entered into
this day of October, 1991, by and between the City of Chula
Vista, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Owner"
and Richard Friedson dba Visions, a sole proprietorship,
hereinafter referred to as "Architect";
WIT N E SSE T H :
WHEREAS, the Owner entered into an agreement with the
Architect on November 21, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the 250-day construction period for the Norman Park
Center Renovation and Expansion Project commenced on February 11,
1991; and
WHEREAS, the estimated number of hours required to provide the
agreed upon architectural services were insufficient for the
duration of the project construction; and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned necessitate the execution of an
amendment to the original agreement with the Architect to provide
for an extension of the term to be coterminus with the construction
contract and to provide for an accord for past services performed
and for additional compensation for such additional services as are
needed to complete the contract administration phases of the
Original Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED by and between the parties
hereto that the following designated portions of the original
agreement are amended to read as follows:
I. Section 1.1, subparagraph k should read:
"k. Assistance, during construction with on-site
inspections, attendance at construction meetings,
attendance at meetings by Architects consultants as
required, and submittal review, notwithstanding
Exhibit A."
II. section 1.3.1, subparagraph c is hereby deleted.
III. Section 10.2 shall read as follows:
I ~, 15
"This Agreement shall be in effect until all services
required hereunder to be rendered including construction
administration services, have been rendered, but not
sooner than the completion of the construction of the
renovation project, and any postconstruction services as
may be required by the City."
IV. with reference to Section 11.1, Basic Compensation, of
the Original Agreement as of the time of this Amendment, Consultant
has performed work required under Phases 3, 4, 5, 6 and partially
under Phase 7, and Consultant is required to finish the original
work required under Phases 7 and 8 referred to in the Original
Agreement a~ construction contract administration services and
postconstruction services as needed. There is a dispute between
the parties as to the amount of compensation to which Consultant is
entitled for past work performed and the parties have negotiated a
price for the completion of specified construction contract
administration and postconstruction services that will be required
of the Consultant for a fixed fee as follows:
1. Notwithstanding the provisions in the Original
Agreement, as of the time of execution of this
First Amendment, the only amount remaining due
Consultant for services heretofore rendered and
billed is $5,871.24 which City agrees to pay upon
execution of this Agreement.
2. For all construction contract administration and
postcontruction services as described in Exhibit A
to thts Agreement, Consultant will perform same and
city will compensate Consultant therefor in the
amount of $10,725, an amount which includes all
reimbursable expenses previously provided for in
the Original Agreement under Section 11.4.
3. For any additional architectural services required
or requested by City, not described within the
scope of remaining services as set forth in Exhibit
A, Consultant will perform on an hourly billing
basis according to the following billing rate
schedule:
Hourlv Billina Rate:
Principal Architect
Project Architect
Project Designer/Senior Draftsman
Intermediate Draftsman
Junior Draftsman
Administrative Staff
$85.00
$75.00
$60.00
$45.00
$30.00
$24.00
V. section 11.4 is deleted.
2
\ ~ -I (P
VI. Section 11.6.2 shall read as follows:
"IF THE SERVICES covered by this First Amendment to the
Agreement have not been completed by March 31, 1992, the
amounts of compensation, rates and multiples set forth
herein shall be equitably adjusted."
VII. All other terms and conditions of the Original Agreement
not amended by this First Amendment to Agreement remain in full
force and effect.
This First Amendment to Agreement is entered into as of the
day and year first written above.
OWNER:
ARCHITECT:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RICHARD FRIEDSON, DBA VISIONS
ARCHITECTS
Tim Nader, Mayor
Richard Friedson, Principal
Architect
Attest:
City Clerk
At:'
i:
city Attorney
C:\Ag\Visionsl
3
13-11
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
I. Basic Services
A.
Construction Observation
48 hours
1. site Meetings/Inspections
(Architect, Electrical Engineer, Mechanical
Engineer), additional meetings and inspections as
requested by the City which will be billed as
additional services at $85.00 per hour.
2. Pre-Final Punch List
(Architect, Electrical Engineer, Mechanical
Engineer) 1 day inspection, no specific hours,
rather what is needed to complete inspection.
3.
Final Inspection
(Architect, Electrical Engineer,
Engineer) 1 final inspection visit,
hours, rather what is needed to
inspection.
Mechanical
no specific
completion
B. Submittal Review
Visions will submit outstanding submittals as part of
turn-key agreement, hours were included as an estimate.
C. As-Built Drawings
Post construction estimate of:
29 hours
Sub total basic service agreement:
D.
Reimbursable expenses for basic services,
month x 5.5 months)
$9,900.00
($150.00 per
$825.00
\ ~-,~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
pi
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 10-22-91
Resolution 1~3 7/' Approving a Joint Use Agreement between
the City of Chula Vista and San Diego Gas & Electric Co. to
allow the City to locate a sewer within SDG&E's easement.
Director of Publ ic workf f
City ManageKcf? (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On July 30, 1991, the City Council approved the tentative subdivision map for
Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area III. Development of this area requires
the construction of the south leg of the Rice Canyon trunk sewer to provide
sewer service. The proposed al ignment for the new sewer crosses an eXisting
San Diego Gas and Electric Co. (SDG&E) easement. In order to grant the City
rights to construct and maintain the sewer SDG&E requires that the City enter
into a Joint Use Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: That Counci 1 approve and authori ze the Mayor to execute the
agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A.
DISCUSSION:
Approva 1 of the proposed Joi nt Use Agreement is necessary for the City to
permit construction of the trunk sewer wi th i n an exi st i ng 250' wi de easement
granted to SDG&E. The sewer wi 11 not only serve the Rancho del Rey SPA II I
deve 1 opment but wi 11 also permit removal of the exi st i ng Mi ss i on Verde and
Candlewood sewer pump stations by providing connections for these areas to the
permanent gravity sewer system.
Once the Joint Use Agreement is executed by the City it will be transmitted
for execution by SDG&E and subsequently recorded at the County Recorder's
Office.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
EAF:EY-354
WPC 5765E
/i-I /II{-L
.
Recording Requested by
San Diego Gas & Electric
When Recorded Mail To:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
P. O. Box 1831
San Diego, CA 92112
Attn:
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE
JOXIIT 08B AGRBBMBIIT
The undersigned declares consideration is less than $100.00
and Transfer Tax is none.
THIS AGREEMENT, dated
, by and between
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, a corporation (SDG&E), and the
City of Chula Vista, a Municipal corporation (Second Party), is
made with reference to the following facts:
A. SDG&E is engaged in the business of transmitting and
distributing gas and electricity within the County of San Diego,
State of California and has facilities for such purposes located
in, upon, over, under and across that certain easement and right-
of-way granted to SDG&E as described on Exhibit "An attached
hereto (SDG&E's Easement);
B. Second party desires to acquire and is now acquiring
easements and rights-of-way and intends to construct, operate and
-1-
[NADEAJTU. 126]
10/"'3
. .
maintain therein an eight inch (8") PVC sewer line lying within a
fifteen foot (15') wide easement in the configuration shown on
Exhibit "B", attached hereto (Second Party's Facilities); and
C. Second Party desires to obtain SDG&E's consent for the
construction, operation aDd maintenance of Second Party's
facilities in, over, under and across SDG&E's Easement along the
route(s) particularly shown on said Exhibit "B" (Designated
Route(s)).
NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, receipt of which
is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:
1. Second Party, its successors in interest and assigns, shall
have the right and privilege to construct, operate and
maintain Second Party's Facilities in, over, under and
across SDG&E's Easement by the Designated Route(s), together
with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom by
- (
practical route(s). In the event Second Party's route(s) of
ingress or egress at any time, in the sole discretion of
SDG&E, conflict with SDG&E's use of the SDG&E Easement,
Second Party agrees, upon notice from SDG&E, to relocate
said route(s) at no expense to SDG&E. SDG&E shall cooperate
with Second Party to effect such rearrangement, relocation
or reconstruction.
2. Second Party agrees not to interrupt the use or operation of
SDG&E's facilities. Any temporary interference with the use
-2-
[NADEAJTU.I26]
I~~r
or operation of SDG&E's facilities shall be made only with
SDG&E's prior written consent.
3. SDG&E shall be deemed the "party first in place" and its
rights and interests shall be prior in time and superior in
title to those of Second Party.
4. Should Second Party desire to construct, install and
maintain surface or subsurface installations other than
those specifically provided for in Exhibit "B", Second Party
shall obtain prior written approval of plans and
specifications for any such proposed installation from
SDG&E, including alignment and locations of all proposed
work. Second Party will submit such plans in writing to
SDG&E not less than forty-five (45) days before the date of
anticipated commencement of any work. Notices shall be
addressed to:
San Diego Gas & Electric
P. O. Box 1831
San Diego, CA 92112
Attention: Land Services Department
SDG&E reserves the right to reject any proposed plan which
would, in its sole determination, substantially conflict
with its use of the SDG&E Easement, its facilities, or be
"unduly burdensome". SDG&E shall consider the (1) relative
size and character or its then existing and possible future
installations, (2) relative hardship, inconvenience, and
expense to SDG&E if plans are approved, (3) relative
-3-
[NADEAJTU.I26]
JL/,f
hardship, inconvenience and expense to Second Party if plans
are rejected, and (4) ~enqth of time and extent of any
service interruption to SDG&E's customers.
5. This agreement shall run with the ~and and be bindinq upon
both parties, their representatives, aqents, successors, and
assiqns.
6. In the event of damaqe caused by an act of God, war, or
other casualty, or damaqe caused under circumstances where
it would be impractical or impossible for SDG&E to notify
the Second Party of the necessity for temporary interference
with the other party's facilities, SDG&E, without notice,
may enter upon the joint easement area and make emerqency
repairs to restore service. SDG&E shall, however, take
~easonab1e and prudent measures to protect the installations
of the Second Party and minimize such interference and as
soon as practically possible, notify the Second Party of
such emerqency repairs. If permanent repairs are required
after such emerqency repairs have been made, reasonable
notice shall be qiven to the Second Party.
7. Each party shall save, indemnify and hold harmless the other
party aqainst any liability, loss, cost, damaqe and expense
caused by or arisinq from (i) an act(s) or omission(s) of
such party, its employees, aqents, contractors, successors
and assiqns or (ii) the location and existence of its above-
-4-
[NADEAJ'I'U. I2 6]
Ilf-(,
described facilities, whether defective or otherwise;
including, but not limited to, any such loss, cost, damage,
liability and expense arising from damage to or destruction
of real and personal property or injury to or death of any
person. Liability to a third party(ies) shall be divided
between the parties hereto in proportion to the measure of
each party's liability. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each
party shall hold harmless the other party against damage to
or destruction of its facilities caused by an act(s) of a
third party(ies).
8. Nothing herein contained shall constitute a grant of
easement by SDG&E to Second Party, it being understood that
any such grant may be obtained only from the fee owner.
9. In the event either party commences legal action against the
other by reason of an alleged breach of this agreement or in
connection with joint use of the SDG&E Easement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover court costs
and attorney's fees as set by the court. "Prevailing Party"
means the party in whose final judgment is rendered.
10. Second party agrees to monument the center line of the
proposed eight inch (8") sewer line at fifty foot (50')
-5-
[NADEAJTU.I26]
1~-7
intervals within the SDG&E easement with permanent markers, (i.e.
marker paddles) at the time of construction.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
agreement to be executed by duly authorized officers on the day
and year first above written.
SDG&E
"SECOND PARTY"
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO.,
a corporation
City of Chula Vista,
a Municipal Corporation
By
By
Keith L. Little, Supervisor
Land Management section
Land Services Department
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula vista
Drawn By:
Date:
R/W No.:
A.P. No:
TWN
9/26/91
45230
640-050-26
640-060-11
-6-
[NADEAJTU.I26]
IJ/"~
EXHIBIT "A"
That certain strip of land 250 feet in width, lyinq within
the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Quarter Section 62 and
Quarter Section 43 of Rancho De La Nacion, in the city of Chula
Vista, County of San Dieqo, State of California, accordinq to Map
thereof No. 166 made by Morrill, filed in the Office of the
County Recorder of said County of San Dieqo, described in an
easement to San Dieqo Gas' Electric Company, recorded March 9,
1960 at Recorder's File/Paqe No. 48825 of Official Records of
said County of San Dieqo.
IJI-1
.~
.
-
Project site.
EXtBT .A.
l.;:~-
-,
It-.- .
~
'8
N-
a
.
-
.-
'.
VICINITY MAP
NO $CAJ.E
/ / er..gt '\"t ~
/
// X
EXlSi1NG 250' S.D.G. & E EASEMENT PER /
DOC. REC. 3/9/60 AS F /p 48825 O.R. /
5.D.G. Ie E T/WER 83~ b _:..:::
/ X' A
/ / b~
/ /
/
, ~
PROPOSED 15' SEWER
EASEMENT
/.,-
/9'
~
5.D.G. & E TOWER 84
/
/ ~A INDICATES 5.G.D. &: E AND lHE cm OF
CHULA \1STA JOINT USE AGREEMENT AREA.
/
/
/
DRA\\tI BY: P.D.C.
DAlE: 10/7/91
SOUTH RICE CYN. TRLN< SEWER
JONT USE AGFEEMENT AREA
It!... /0
Ad.
L/835-15.LEG, 09/24/91 (CW/AL), AW, PAGE 1
EXHIBIT 'B'
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
POR
JOINT USE AGREEMENT
ALL THAT PORTION OF QUARTER SECTION 43 AND 62 OF RANCHO DE LA NACION
ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 166 ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER
OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE
OF CALIFORNIA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
BEING A STRIP OF LAND 15 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING 7.50 FEET MEASURED AT RIGHT
ANGLES TO THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE.
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID QUARTER SECTION 4~, THENCE ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION.
1. NORTH 17050'15" WEST
2. NORTH 40030'25" EAST
3. WESTERLY
4. NORTH 88038'07" WEST
-..
733.49 FEET MORE OR LESS TO A POINT OF INTER-
SECTION WITH THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE
OF THAT CERTAIN 250 FOOT SDG&E
EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT RECORDED
03/09/60 AS FILE/PAGE NO. 48825
O.R.; THENCE LEAVING SAID SECTION
LINE AND ALONG SAID SOUTHEASTERLY
LINE OF SAID EASEMENT
75.57 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
SAID TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING BEING
ON THE ARC OF A NON-TANGENT 67.50
FOOT RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWE-
STERLY, A RADIAL FROM SAID POINT
BEARS NORTH 22013'37" WEST; THENCE
LEAVING SAID SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF
SAID EASEMENT AND ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE
27.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23035'-
30"; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID CURVE
277.49 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT 67.50
FEET RADIUS CURVE CONCAVE SOUTH-
EASTERLY; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF
SAID CURVE
/0/"'//
~
L/835-15.LEG, 09/24/91 (CW/AL), AW, PAGE 2
5. WESTERLY
27.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 23035'-
30" TO A POINT OF TERMINUS ON THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID 250 FOOT
SDG&E EASEMENT
THE SIDELINES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ARE TO BE LENGTHENED OR SHORTENED AS TO
BEGIN ON THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE AND END ON THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID
SDG&E EASEMENT.
,-
...
JLj, /.2.
.11
r~ '"", ~'., '.
, ......
~ ..--....,..,.......~- ._........~
6 - 23'35'30"
R - 67.50'
L .. 27.79'
\~
r,;,\IJ'.
!J~
--
/~ -~...........
:;..-- ~
CITY OF CliULA VISTA SEVtfR
ESt.tTjP' PER DOC. REC._
~~ AS F _O.R.
~T.P.O.B.
~ /
'6 /
"Z-/
.-t:- 7.16'~ i =-'t.t - N40"30'25-e
~. CJ!. CJ!. 75.5;
~ ~/ ~V EXlS'nNG In S.D.G. Ie E EASEMENT PER /
/L DOC; 'jEC. 3/9/60 AS f IF' 48625 O.R. Y
~ )". y
. /
~'I'.. /
Afi ~. /"'0
~S.D.G. Ie E / \. ~
V <:1:~o
'/ 0 ~'Z-
/ ~ ~~
/ ~ ~ 'Ii
/ - ~ ~
/ %
/ "Z-
/ \
/~hI INDICAlES 5.D.G. Ie E AND THE CITY OF CliULA VISTA
/ JOINT USE AGREE},tEN~ AREA. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~
...1
'Ca
~-
~
<&
~
-
~
~
i~
~
\
~
~~.
~
.
~
\
~
-;P
.
-;P.
~
~
o
a
~
~
"Z-
"J7
9-
~
TR. S0-6 UNJT-D
M ^ ~{i09Bg "
r\,.:"
J}~~ ~:-~.-:-: . :.~~~,
:' . ~~)~"-,, : .....
~', l'."j, l~. .?~ "
, -t. -<1. C"f , --: '{;. :...\1
lIMOTHY D. RAMSEY DATE :.~H" Ii ',,'<, ~-2:r
P.Ls. 5962 , EXPIRrS12/ ~/92 '",' ~ ~ 1.?,,~::.9Z. / ~I
\, (~",:"-'-"fkI' ~ 1iti
~ ProJcl.Dlnp ConnIlIG.. "::'J:'D;i."'~'" ,
......tftIftM MIIJ - - ..~~....
POI ..- ...... "..,. ..,. ... ..... OIl. .., -~.
.,.._oH'It 'u _./Iad I . _I
P.O.B.
RESOLUTION NO. 1~3 7(,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A JOINT USE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SAN DIEGO
GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY TO ALLOW THE CITY TO
LOCATE A SEWER WITHIN SDG&E'S EASEMENT, AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 30, 1991, the City Council approved the
tentative subdivision map for Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning
Area III; and
WHEREAS, development
construction of the south leg of
provide sewer service; and
of this area requires the
the Rice Canyon trunk sewer to
WHEREAS, the proposed alignment for the new sewer crosses
an existing San Diego Gas and Electric Company easement; and
WHEREAS, in order to grant the City rights to construct
and maintain the sewer, SDG&E requires that the City enter into a
Joint Use Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve a Joint Use Agreement
between the City of Chula vista and San Diego Gas & Electric
Company to allow the ci ty to locate a sewer wi thin SDG&E' s
easement, a copy of which is on file on the office of the city
Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
as to
d
by
JJ
'ty
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce M.
Attorney
C:\RS\SDG&E Joint Use
/J/~ /5
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
15'
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE: Resol ution //,.3?? Approving recordation of easement deed
and waiving sewer connection fees for 980 Fourth Avenue
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager(/' (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-L)
The City Council on May 14,1991, by Resolution 16155 approved agreements
between the Ci ty and 13 property owners along both sides of Fourth Avenue
between Kittiwake Avenue and Del Rey High School.
The agreements stipulate certain conditions that must be satisfied before the
easement deeds, which physical possession is being held in trust by the City,
may be deemed to have been delivered to the City and the City is authorized to
record same.
The easement deeds provide additional right-of-way for the widening of Fourth
Avenue and the installation of missing sidewalk improvements. This project is
budgeted in the current Capital Improvement Program. Engineering is currently
obtaining field survey data so they can proceed with the design and
preparation of final construction plans.
Engi neeri ng has recei ved a request from the property owners of 980 Fourth
Avenue that the City i nsta 11 a sewer 1 atera 1 and connect them to the publ i c
sewer prior to the construction of the project. The installation of the sewer
lateral and connection to the public sewer at no cost to the property owner
was one of the conditions agreed to in exchange for the additional dedication
of right-of-way to the City.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt reso 1 ut ion approvi ng the record at i on of easement deed
and waiving sewer connection fees for 980 Fourth Avenue.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSS ION:
George and Mari so 1 Vi 11 asenor own the property at 980 Fourth Avenue. The
property which is currently improved with a single family three-bedroom house
is currently 1 isted for sale. The property owners are having problems with
their private sewer and septic tank system. They are in the process of
securing a government guaranteed loan and need to make connection to the
public sewer system before they can obtain approval of the loan.
Their agreement with the City (copy attached) obligates the City to provide
them public sewer service at no cost in exchange for their dedication of the
needed right-of-way for Fourth Avenue. The City is physically holding in
trust the executed easement deed until the conditions of the agreement have
been satisfied. Their agreement also obligates the City to replace their
/5~/
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
/S
10/22/91
existing driveways at the time the City's project is constructed. It was
originally anticipated that the sewer lateral installation would be installed
with the Fourth Avenue construction project.
The agreement also states that the City Council shall hold a public hearing to
determine if all the conditions of the agreement have occurred. If the City
Council so fi nds, then the easement deed may be recorded. Otherwi se, the
easement deed is to be returned to the property owner.
Engineering has received a letter (copy attached) from George and Marisol
Villasenor requesting that, because of the urgency to satisfy the requirements
for obtaining a loan, the City proceed expeditiously with the installation of
the sewer lateral. They are waiving the requirement that the City Council
hold a public hearing so that the City may proceed with the recordation of the
easement document. Pending eminent sale of the property and transfer of
ownership it is in the City's best interest to proceed with the immediate
recordation of the easement document, rather than wait until the project is
completed.
The City wi 11 rep1 ace thei r exi st i ng dri veways with new dri veways when the
project is constructed. In the event that the project does not move forward,
the Ci ty wi 11 replace any temporary asphaltic patch in the exi st i ng s i dewa 1 k
and driveway with permanent portland cement concrete.
Engineering design staff is awaiting surveying field notes prior to starting
design of final construction plans. Field survey information will be
available by the end of November. Final plans, specifications and cost
estimates are scheduled for completion by the end of March 1992. construction
should begin in June 1992. Construction could be delayed pending relocation
of various utilities. Also one parcel of right-of-way needs to be obtained
from the property owner at 991 Fourth Avenue which could delay the project.
Although the agreement states that "George and Mariso1 Villasenor will not be
required to pay whatever sewer connection charge," the City Attorney advises
that the sewer fees need to be specifically waived by the City Council.
Sect ion 13.14.020 CVMC requi res the payment of a sewerage fac il ity
participation fee of $2,220. Section 13.16.020 CVMC requires the payment of
$1,189 for the sewer 1 atera 1 construct i on from the sewer main to the new
right-of-way line. Engineering staff is recommending that all sewer fees
required by the City Code prior to connection to the pub1 ic sewer system be
waived by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City is not collecting $3,409 in sewer revenues. The
loss in revenue is offset by the value of 507.5 square feet of right-of-way
which is being dedicated to the City by the property owners.
KJG/Fi1e: AX-116
WPC 5773E
/5'.2.
October 8, 1991
Mr. Cliff Swanson
Deputy Director of Public Works/city Engineer
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: AGREEMENT RE: DELIVERY OF EASEMENT DEED FOR 980 FOURTH AVENUE
On January 1, 1991 we executed an agreement with the City of Chula
vista which was approved by City Council Resolution 16155.
We are experiencing difficulties with our private sewer system and
are in the process of receiving a government guaranteed loan. We
must connect to the City's sewer system in order to comply with the
lender's requirements prerequisite to loan approval.
We are requesting that the conditions of our agreement with the
City be amended such that it will effect the construction of a
sewer lateral from the sewer main in Fourth Avenue to the new right
of way line as soon as possible and prior to the construction of
the City's project. This is with the understanding and agreed that
in exchange for the dedication as referenced in the aforementioned
agreement that we, George and Marisol Villasenor, will not be
required to pay whatever costs associated with the installation of
the sewer lateral and sewer connection at the time connection is
made to the pUblic sewer.
We are waiving the requirement that a public hearing be held by the
City Council to determine that the conditions mentioned in our
agreement have occurred and we consent to the recordation of the
easement document by the City with the County Recorder.
We understand that the construction of the City's project will not
begin for several months.
/.Y.3
villasenor
2
October 7, 1991
We are willing to accept a temporary patch of asphalt on the
concrete driveway and sidewalk in front of our house until both
driveways and the new sidewalk are replaced at the new property
line in accordance with the City's project plans. If in the event
the City's project is canceled, the City will replace the temporary
asphalt patch with permanent concrete driveway and sidewalk.
Thank you for your help and assistance in this matter.
sincerely,
,~\/~
~;J J~fq
George ~~ilfa~enor '
Marisol villasenor
KJG:df
(KJG\VILLA.LTR)
"
J~ J./
Form of
Agreement re Delivery of Easement Deed
,
Th i s Agreement, made ~.u~ I ,199g' for the purposes of reference
only, and effective a~/of the te last executed by the parties, is made
between the City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the
State of California ("City") and the undersigned, fee owners of the property
commonly known as 980 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, and legally described in the
Easement Deed attached as Exhibit A (Grantors),
For reasonable and valid consideration, Grantors and City agree as follows:
Grantors of the Easement Deed attached hereto as Exhibit A hereby transfer
physical possession of this Easement Deed in trust to the City, and said
Easement Deed shall not be deemed to be delivered to the City unless and until
the City Council, exercising their reasonable discretion, shall determine (at
a public hearing, notice of which shall be given to the undersigned grantor,
and the opportunity to appear and present evidence at said public hearing
shall have been afforded to the undersigned Grantor) that the following
conditions have occurred:
1. It is agreed that in exchange for the above dedication, George and Marisol
Villasenor will not be required to pay whatever sewer connection charge
may be in place at the time the property owners (George and Marisol
Villasenor) wish to connect to the public sewer.
2. Both driveways to be replaced at City's cost.
Failing the determination by the City Council that said conditions have
occurred, this Easement Deed, shall be returned to the Grantor and shall be
deemed not to have been delivered to the City.
Upon the determination by the City Council of the occurrence of these
conditions after the required public hearing, this Easement Deed shall be
deemed to have been delivered to the City, and the City is hereby authorized
to record same.
Dated: n..",<-o (tlv 1 I , 199/'
c \ 0 <
Grantor: \..} ~ _ . \) .Q.Qc\"Q.' _-:.
r
Grantor: I!.~ ,;;J/rUM~
City of Chula Vista
~~.1I.I.mt .
Mayor of the City of Cliula Vista
At""'yJlIP1. (' !2 7ep.;
City Cl k
easement
,.,;.{:!:..I I~'j.
~I\",IS5
Qd"q-o,\
WHEN . RECORDED, PLEASE MAIL
THIS INSTRUMENT TO:
City Clerk
City of Chula Vista
P. O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 92012
NO TRANSFER TAX DUE
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE ONLY
Assessor's Parcel
No. 618-372-03
Easement for Street Purp-oses
GEORGE L. VILLASENOR AND MARISOL VILLASENOR
do(es) hereby grant, convey and dedicate to the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
State of California, the right of way and incidents thereto for a public
street upon, over and across that certain real property in the City of
Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, described as
follows:
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
{
L
(
(
PW-E-77
15',7
The Grantor hereby further grants to the City of Chula Vista the privilege
and right to extend drainage structures and excavation and embankment slopes
beyond the limits of the herein described right-of-way where required for
the construction and maintenance of said public street. RESERVING unto
grantor of the above described parcel of land, his successors or assigns,
the right to eliminate such slopes and/or drainage structures or portions
thereof, when in the written opinion of the City Engineer of Grantee, the
necessity therefore is removed by substituting other protection, support
and/or drainage facility, provided such substitution is first approved in
writing by said City Engineer.
The Grantor hereby further grants to Grantee all trees, growths (growing
or that may hereafter grow), and road building materials within said
right-of-way, including the right to take water, together with the right
to use the same in such manner and at such locations as said Grantee may
deem proper, needful or necessary, in the construction, reconstruction,
improvement or maintenance of said public street.
The Grantor, for himself, his successors and assigns, hereby waives any
claim for any and all damages to Grantor's remaining property contiguous
to the right-of-way hereby conveyed by reason of the location, construction,
landscaping or maintenance of said public street.
Dated this
,~/'YIf.1
day ;~~~
://au/cJ./ Y.#M~.~
,l9U
INDIVIDUAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT
NQ,201
State of
California
3rd January
On this the _ day of
19.21-, before me,
County of
San Diego
}SS.
Alicia Kemp
i
,
the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared
Marisol Villasenor
{V'''t:' 1 ~T .~. ::::EAL
o personally known to me
(}J proved to me on the basis of satisfact~ry evidence
to be the person(s) whose name(s) 1 S
within instrument, and acknowledged that she
WITNE~:;:officialse~~
Notary'S Signature I l
subscribed to the
executed it.
ALICIA KEMP
NOTAp.... p! ::':1 ,r . SAU;:'ORNIA
~N DIOGO COUNTY
My ccmm. expires MAY 25, 1993 .'
-~-~~
1
1HS CERTIACATE
MUST BE ATTACHED
TO THE OOCUMENT
DESCRIBED AT RIGHT:
. . ed below is OPTIONAL it c:c:Ud prevent ~ attac:tvnent of this certific8te to another doclment.
ATTEHTIONNOTARY:AIthoughthe;monnatiOn_ Easement for street purposes - 980 Fourth
Tolle or Type of Document
1 Date of Document 1/2/91
George Villasenor
Aven
Number of Pages
Signer(s) Other Than Named Above
7100.101
C NATlCNALterARY ~11ON.823BRerTmet /we, -P.O, Box 7184. C8noga Pwk, CA 913)4-7184
)yyj
980 FOURTH AVENUE
EXHIBIT "A"
THAT PORTION OF LOT 29 IN QUARTER SECTION 146 OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, BEING IN RANCHO DE LA NACION, IN THE COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ACCORDING TO MAP THEREOF NO. 505,
FILED IN THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF QUARTER SECTION 146, SAID
POINT ALSO BEING THE INTERSECTION OF FOURTH AVENUE AND MOSS
STREET PER MAP 4571 FILED IN THE COUNTY RECORDER'S OFFICE OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE ALONG CENTERLINE OF FOURTH AVENUE, NORTH 180 27'
44 II WEST, A DISTANCE OF 257.64 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 710 37' 16"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40. 00 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING,
SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF UNIT 3, LOT 29, OF
KIFFE AND LESCHORN SUBDIVISION NO. 1 PER MAP NO. 4571; THENCE
SOUTH 710 37' 16" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY PROPERTY LINE OF SAID
UNIT, A DISTANCE OF 7.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 180 27' 44" EAST, A
DISTANCE OF 72.50 FEET; THENCE NORTH 710 37' 16" EAST, A DISTANCE
OF 7.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID UNIT; THENCE NORTH
180 27' 44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 72.50 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
MC:das
(DCD1\LEGAL8.DOC)
/5""
. , II
N 71 37 " E
, ....., T ?
1_- (j I
'..J
.
N "'11
, II
37 I'
,-,
" '-,
,I ,./
--. -
r)
'"
,............ "-
,,- (
',-
'\'" .... \
,
,
-
'"
~
DRAWN BY
M.C.
CATE
E
MOSS
TIT!.E
'?
~-
/
I
I
I
~
=;"0
_ It!
... ~;
.. ..
~I'-
2:
,
., """-~
,.
1/
II~
/~
J-
/
"IIJ
.,' .1/
~
2~
-
to-
('t
-..
-
'Z
T.P.O.8.
I
,
/
,,...)
," ,.,I
,. \ )
,,...\ J
...~
,
40 ~.
I
SC,qL, ,'.
.50'
j
-~~
\/I
r(
~
=...
..t.
"~ ~
-III ~
- --
:z~
11///;1
Of NOTES ARGA
TO 86 A'" Vl1a60
S07. S SQ. F"T 1:
~../~ o. 8.
SE. c....
.." '/4 SEe '4~
c,..
( I,
.....J
\l.c.AXIIG
f\.O.W. PLAT FOR !ISo F'OVRTH
A.P.N... '" 8 _ 372 _030
AVE.
1.5'-/(/
RESOLUTION NO. /,.3 7?
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT RE DELIVERY OF EASEMENT DEED AND
WAIVER OF SEWER CONNECTION FEES FOR 980 FOURTH
AVENUE
The city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the city Council on May 14, 1991, by Resolution
16155 approved agreements between the City and 13 property owners
along both sides of Fourth Avenue between Kittiwake Avenue and Del
Rey High School; and
WHEREAS, the agreements stipulate certain conditions that
must be satisfied before the easement deeds, which physical
possession is being held in trust by he City, may be deemed to have
been delivered to the city and the City is authorized to record
same; and
WHEREAS, the easement deeds provide additional right-of-
way for the widening of Fourth Avenue and the installation of
missing sidewalk improvements which project is budgeted in the
current Capital Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, Engineering is currently obtaining field survey
data so they can proceed with the design and preparation of final
construction plans; and
WHEREAS, Engineering has
property owners of 980 Fourth Avenue
lateral and connect them to the
construction of the project; and
received a request from the
that the city install a sewer
public sewer prior to the
WHEREAS, the
connection to the public
one of the conditions.
installation of the sewer lateral and
sewer at no cost to the property owner was
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Amendment to
the Agreement re Delivery of Easement Deed, a copy of which is on
file in the office of the Clerk, and authorizes the Mayor to
execute same.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that pursuant to
Amendment, the City Clerk is hereby directed to record
the San Diego County Recorder's office.
the First
same with
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city will waive the sewer
connection fees for 980 Fourth Avenue.
/.5"'1/
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
J~/;;'
ity Attorney
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT RE DELIVERY OF EASEMENT DEED
THIS AGREEMENT, made this day of , 1991, for the
purposes of reference only and effective as of the date last
executed by the parties, is made between the city of Chula Vista,
a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California
("city") and the undersigned, fee owners of the property, commonly
known as 980 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, and legally described in
the Easement Deed attached as Exhibit A ("Grantors"), and is made
with reference to the following facts:
WHEREAS, on or about January 1, 1991, the parties hereto
entered into an agreement regarding the delivery of an Easement
Deed ("Original Agreement") which Original Agreement did not permit
the city to use the Easement Deed except and unless it made a
finding of certain conditions having been met; and
WHEREAS, Grantors desire that the conditions regarding
the delivery of the Easement Deed should be removed and that the
Easement Deed should be unconditionally delivered to the city.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto do hereby agree as
follows:
1. The Easement Deed heretofore conditionally delivered
to the city in trust shall be deemed to be unconditionally
delivered without meeting said conditions and that the City has the
full right and authority to treat the delivery of the Easement Deed
as unconditional.
2. The City is hereby authorized to record same.
DATED: October 17, 1991
GRANTOR:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GRANTOR:
Mayor
ATTEST:
city Clerk
Bruce M. Booga
city Attorney
C:\RS\980 4th
/5--/3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ) (P
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 10-22-91
Reso 1 ut ion f,..?1'/J Approvi ng an agreement wi th Ryals and
Associates for acquisition services in connection with various
capital improvement program projects.
Director of Public Work~
City Manager~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes__No-x-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Several capital improvement projects are currently budgeted which will require
additional right-of-way for construction. To expedite the acquisition process
staff proposes to contract for property acquisition services for a period of
one year with a renewable clause for an additional year. Staff has evaluated
the proposal s for provi di ng profess i ona 1 acqui sit ion servi ces and recommends
that the City approve the agreement with Ryals and Associates to provide these
servi ces through October 1992 whi ch also i ncl udes a renewable cl ause for an
additional year through October of 1993.
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council adopt resolution approving
the agreement with Ryals and Associ ates for profess i ona 1 property acqui sit ion
services.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On August 2, 1991 staff sent a request for proposals and statement of
qualifications to 45 firms to provide professional property appraisal and/or
acquisition services to which 3 firms responded in regards to providing
acquisition services. This was a rebidding of previous fiscal years contract
for services we have used each year in connection with our CIP program. These
firms were 1) Ryals and Associates; 2) Fraser Engineering, Inc.; and 3) Cutler
and Associates, Inc. The proposals were evaluated and ranked on September 27,
1991. A three member panel evaluated the proposals based on the firms ability
to perform the work, personnel evaluation, familiarity with requisition
procedures for publ ic works projects, and finally cost. The panel consisted
of two Senior Civil Engineers in the Department of Public Works and a
Community Development Specialist from the Community Development Department.
Based upon the proposal evaluation the committee felt no interviews were
necessary and recommended contracting with Ryals and Assoc i ates to provi de
property acquisition services. This firm just completed its current contract
with the City for providing these service. Their work has been quite
satisfactory. Ryals and Associates are also currently providing acquisition
services to several North County water districts as well as to the City of
Oceanside. In addition, they submitted the lowest fee schedule.
Fraser Engineering, Inc. is primarily an engineering firm and, while they do
have one senior right-of-way agent, they proposed to subcontract out
acquisition services. Their proposal was looking toward also providing
engi neeri ng servi ces whi ch was not an adequate response to the request for
statement of qualifications.
Ib' I
Page 2, Item Il.o
Meeting Date 10-22-91
Cutler and Associates is located out of the County in Lon9 Beach. John Cutler
is a real estate broker and not a certified/licensed acquisition agent. Their
statement of qualifications also indicated they are quite busy which, staff
felt, may affect their ability to respond to the City's needs. There also was
little information on the overall qualifications of the firm.
Staff proposes to contract with thi s fi rm on a "as needed" bas is through
October 30,1992. Included in the contract is a renewable clause for an
additional year based on written approval by the Director of Public Works.
Following is a comparison of their rates from 1 ast year and those contained in
the proposal:
FY 90/91 11/91-10/92 11/92 -10/93
Principal/Project Manager $65 $75 $82
Relocation Agent N/A $65 $72
Senior Acquisition Agent N/A $65 $72
Acquisition Agent $54 $55 $61
Technician $30 N/A N/A
Clerical N/A $20 $22
Examples of typical projects which require additional right-of-way are
installation of street improvements along Broadway from "F" to "1" Street,
obtaining drainage easements for construction of drainage facilities,
construction of street improvements on Broadway from "L" Street to Naples
Street, Construction of street improvements along 4th Avenue along Kittiwake
to Del Rey School.
During fiscal year 1990/91, the City paid $32,844 to Ryals and Associates for
services on four projects as follows:
1) Acquisition of nine parcels along Fifth Avenue between L Street and
Naples Street. Fee: $8,800
2) Acquisition of drainage easements from two properties at 1070/1076
Fifth Avenue. Fee: $3,544
3) Acquisition of 459 "F" Street, 341 Orange Avenue and 379 Orange
Avenue. Fee: $6,000
4) Right-of-Way acquisition services for Otay Valley Road project
i ncl udi ng 12 temporary easements and 8 right-of-way parcel s. Fee:
$14,500
The services under this type of contract has allowed staff to continue with
the CIP design process in a timely manner. While existing staff could have
done much of the acqui sit i on work, it woul d have put an addi t i ona 1 burden on
not only the professional staff, but the clerical staff as well delaying other
projects. In addition, some of the acquisitions included were more difficult
1~'2.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
Jf.,
10-22-91
than others and requi red more compl i cated negot i at ions wh i ch staff is not
trained to handle. Further, the services included some clerical and
techni ci an work. A 1 so, in order to meet requested deadl i nes, it may have
i ncl uded the work of more than one agent at a time. Thus the funds expended
on this contract last year would appear support the addition a 1/4 to 1/2 time
staff, it would in fact not support even that low level of staff. While the
contract for next fi sca 1 year i ncl udes a maxi mum of $100,000, the payments
wi 11 only be for those servi ces actually requi red. At thi s poi nt we cannot
accurately predict the amount of work required, but anticipate it to be
similar to last fiscal years requirements.
Since this agreement will provide services for several CIP projects staff
proposes to issue purchase orders for each project as acquisition services are
required. Fees of acquisition services shall be negotiated individually based
on the fee schedule included in the agreement. Compensation for services
provided under the agreement shall not exceed $100,000. for acquisition
services.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds not in excess of a total of $100,000. will be
encumbered from individual project accounts as services are required. Under
last years contract with Ryals and Associates, a total of four purchase orders
were written for an aggregate amount of $32,844.
KG:KY-178
WPC 5770E
110-3
RESOLUTION NO. /~.3 /~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH RYALS
AND ASSOCIATES FOR ACQUISITION SERVICES IN
CONNECTION WITH VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS,
currently budgeted
construction; and
several capital improvement projects are
which will require additional right-of-way for
WHEREAS, to expedite the acquisition process, staff
proposes to contract for property acquisition services for a period
of one year with a renewable clause for an additional year; and
WHEREAS, staff has evaluated the proposals for providing
professional acquisition services and recommends that the City
approve the agreement with Ryals and Associates to provide these
services through October 1991 which also includes a renewable
clause for an additional year through October of 1993.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve an agreement with Ryals
and Associates for acquisition services in connection with various
capital improvement program projects, a copy of which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works
is hereby authorized to use the services of Ryals and Associates as
he determines may be appropriate pursuant to the contr t terms and
within the budget authorization limitatio s herein pro ided.
all by ~
Bruce M. Boogaard,
Attorney
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\RS\Ryals Agreement
$~e- t!HI9"'~~5
AAlD (!.t:)~~rNJAJ ~ f"(J
~eS"LII rtlJ~ NrX r PAG-e"
1~'4
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, I.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
NONE
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
NOT APPLICABLE
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
NOT APPLICABLE
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No --'L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
NONE
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No -1L- If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
Person is defined as: '~ny individual, firm, co~partnership, joint ventlire, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation,
estate, nust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and cO{lntry, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision,
or any other group or combination acting as a unit." 1\. \ 1\; ,
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) (!.. ~ (r.. ,1 \)
'. I.... ~ L-7
Date:
OCTOBER 14, 1991
[A-113\ADISCLOSE.TXT]
RICHARD A. RYALS, PRESIDENT RYALS & ASSOC.
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Revised: 11/30190]
1",~5
~
~
RESOLUTION NO. 16378
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH RYALS AND ASSOCIATES
FOR ACQUISITION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH VARIOUS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM PROJECTS, AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, several capital improvement projects are currently budgeted which
will require additional right-of-way for construction; and,
WHEREAS, to expedite the acquisition process, staff proposes to contract
for property acquisition services for a period of one year with a renewable
clause for an additional year; and,
WHEREAS, staff has eVi!1l!~.ted the pf!!p!!sa1s fot pf'oviciing prOfeS5~(;:'.~1
acquisition services and recommends that the City approve the agreement with
Ryals and Associates to provide these services through October 1991 which also
includes a renewable clause for an additional year through October of 1993.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve an agreement with Ryals and Associates for acqui ition
services in connection with various capital improve~ent.program ~rojects
CJ.Iwk. ~~~~ k~/~(lJ~ ,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED ~he May~r~f' th;-Ci of Ch~'V)sta is he e y
authorized and directed to ex:~~~~~ agreement for nd on behalf of the C y
of Chula Vista. ~ ""'-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public Works is hereby
authorized to use the services of Ryals and Associates as he determines may be
appropriate pursuant to the contract terms and within the budget authorization
limitations herein provided.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Li ppitt
Director of Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
I" :S
Resolution No. 16378
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and AOOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 22nd day of October, 1991, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Grasser Horton, Malcolm, Moore,
Rindone
NOES: Counci lmember: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Council members : Nader
Leonard M. Moore
Mayor-Pro-tempore
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A.Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resol ution No. 16378 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 22nd day of October, 1991.
Executed this 22nd day of October, 1991.
~ /
Authelet, City Clerk
It-~
/\
SUBJECT TO AMEND-
MENTS TO BE
ANNOUNCED AT THE
MEETING
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL PROPERTY
ACQUISITION SERVICES
BE1WEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
RYALS AND ASSOCIATES
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,
1991, by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, a public corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City", and Ryals and Associates a Delaware Corporation
hereinafter referred to as "Consultant," whose address is 2103 Camino Real, Suite 201,
Oceanside, California, 92054, covers certain professional property acquisition services
in connection with various City of Chula Vista Capital Improvement Program projects.
RECITAL
A. WHEREAS, additional public right of way is anticipated to be
required for several City projects currently in design.
B. WHEREAS, the City desires to proceed in a timely manner with the design and
construction of these projects and requires acquisition services to acquire the
additional property.
C. WHEREAS, the Consultant represents that it is qualified, it has personnel and
facilities available necessary to accomplish the work within the required time, and
Consultant desires to undertake the same.
WITNESSETH THAT, in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligations of the duties
as herein expressed, City and Consultant agree as follows:
SECTION I
ScoDe of Work
Consultant shall provide all of the following property acquisition services when requested
in conjunction with various City projects. Acquisition shall be in accordance with the
California Government Code Section 7267 et. seq.
1
/10,,7
A. Acquisition services are as follows:
1. Review title/litigation reports, appraisal reports, right of way and
construction drawings and other documents in sufficient detail to properly
negotiate with the owner(s) and other parties in interest.
2. Acquisitions will be negotiated in concert with the applicable Federal/State
constitutional statute provisions. If relocation assistance is applicable,
consultant will advise owner occupant or tenant that they may be entitled
to Relocation Assistance Program benefits.
3. Conduct negotiations in a professional, fair, honest and ethical manner.
Every reasonable effort will be made to negotiate with the property owner
on a person- to-person basis. If the owner designates another party, such
as an attorney, to negotiate on their behalf, the Consultant will abide by
this request.
4. Written offers to acquire real property interests will include an "Appraisal
Summary Statement" and be mailed CERTIFIED MAIL. The offer will be
made on the basis of the full estimate of market value supported by the
appraisal with no portion withheld for further concession.
5. Negotiations will continue in good faith for as long as there is a reasonable
likelihood of reaching a settlement. Settlements will be based on the
concept of fair market value supported by current accepted appraisal
practices.
6. The Consultant will keep the appraiser advised as to problems relating to
the Fair Market Value offer and will provide the appraiser with any
additional market data that has been provided by the property owner.
7. The Consultant will keep City advised of the status of negotiations in terms
of the owner's attitude, problem areas, and the likelihood of a negotiations
impasse and the probability of an eminent domain action.
8. The Consultant will recommend eminent domain proceedings in the event
an impasse is reached in the negotiation process and provide City with
supporting documentation.
9. If required, an escrow will be opened upon the acceptance of an offer to
purchase. The Consultants will use the escrow facilities of United Title
Company.
2
/ to~y
10. Consultant will promptly transmit to City for acceptance, documents
executed by owner(s) or other parties in interest. A report summarizing
the pertinent data relative to the transaction will be included.
11. Consultant will maintain an acquisition file for each parcel and maintain a
journal of all contacts made with the property owner(s) setting forth a
summary of negotiations and other related information.
B. Consultant shall provide specialized services upon request which may include
the following:
1. Preparation of conveyance documents, right of entry permit, temporary
license to perform work, encroachment permit, etc. and special
agreements necessary for acquisitions, option exchanges, leases and
other documents subject to City approval.
2. Preparation of legal descriptions.
3. Consultation with City staff or legal counsel regarding acquisition or lease
negotiation procedures and policies.
4. Disposition of surplus real property.
5. Provide relocation assistance services and administer the relocation
benefits to which the owner or tenant is entitled to receive.
6. Prepare "REPLACEMENT HOUSING VALUATION REPORTS" as support
documentation for purchase/rental differential payments.
SECTION 2
Authorization. Proaress and Completion
Upon execution of this agreement by both parties hereto Consultant will be authorized
and directed to proceed with the preparation and completion of tasks as provided in
Section I of the Agreement. Consultant shall proceed with the work immediately upon
authorization and prosecute the work diligently to completion.
This agreement shall extend through October 30, 1992. This agreement may be extended
by written authorization from the Director of Public Works for an additional year. This
agreement may be extended by mutual consent through completion of acquisition
services initiated prior to October 30, 1993. .
3
I~,q
It is estimated that governmental review of acquisition documents for this project will take
a total of three (3) weeks. Should the governmental review time extend over this amount,
the specified time period shall be extended.
SECTION 3
Compensation
Consultant shall provide property acquisition services as set forth in Section 1 in
accordance with the fee schedule attached. Compensation for acquisition services
related to specific projects shall be negotiated on a project basis in accordance with the
fee schedule attached. Total compensation for acquisition services rendered through the
duration of this agreement shall not exceed $100,000. Fees shall include expenses to
complete the tasks set forth in Section I which may include but is not limited to
reproduction and printing; telephone charges; and automobile mileage.
Consultant will periodically submit invoices to City pursuant to the attached fee schedule.
Total compensation for the agreement project shall not exceed the above fee.
Invoices will show hours and charges for each fee schedule classification pursuant to the
fee schedule attached.
Payment is due upon presentation of invoice and is past due thirty (30) days from invoice
date. City agrees to pay a service charge on any past-due balance of 1.5 percent per
month to cover additional handling and carrying costs. Any attorney's fees or other cost
incurred in collecting a delinquent account will be paid by City.
SECTION 4
Services bv City
City further agrees to furnish to the Consultant, in a timely manner, such maps, records
and other documents and proceedings, or certified copies thereof, as are available from
City offices and may be reasonably required by the Consultant in the performance of
these services.
SECTION 5
Conflict of Interest
The Consultant is not a public official as defined in the Political Reform Act. Nevertheless,
Consultant presently has and shall acquire no interest whatsoever in the subject matter
of this Agreement, direct or indirect, which would constitute a conflict of interest or give
4
/l~'ID
the appearance of such conflict. No person having any such conflict of interest shall be
employed or retained by the Consultant under this Agreement. The Consultant shall also
be required to execute the attached statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests.
The Consultant may not conduct business for third parties which may be in conflict with
the Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement. The Consultant may not solicit
any business during the term of this Agreement which conflict with his or her
responsibilities under this Agreement.
SECTION 6
Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, the Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his
obligations under this Agreement, or if the Consultant shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements, or stipulations of the agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the
effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination.
In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, survey, drawings, maps,
reports, and other materials prepared by the Consultant shall, at the option of City,
become the property of City and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other
materials up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the amounts
payable under Section 3, hereinabove.
SECTION 7
Termination for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason by giving written notice
to the Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least
thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished
and unfinished documents and other materials described in Section 6, hereinabove, shall,
at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is
terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive
just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents
and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly
waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement
except as set forth in Section 3, hereinabove, in the event of such termination.
5
I b' J)
SECTION 8
Assignability
Consultant shall not assign any interest in the Agreement, and shall not transfer any
interest in the same (whether by assignment or renovation), without prior written consent
of City; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to the Consultant
from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall be
furnished promptly to City. Any assignment requiring approval may not be further
assigned without City approval.
SECTION 9
Ownership. Publication. Reoroduction and Use of Material
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be
the sole and exclusive property of the City. No such materials or properties produced in
whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or
patent right by the Consultant in the United States or in any country without the express
written consent to the City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (as
may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute and otherwise, use
copyright or patent in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms
or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement.
SECTION 10
Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained, and Consultant shall perform as an
independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the
services required under the Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept
Consultant's final work product as is completed. Consultant and any of Consultant's
employees, or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent
contractor, and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall
be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled, including, but not limited
to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave, or other
leave benefits.
6
'b- t'L
SECTION 11
Chances
City may from time to time require changes in the scope of the services by the Consultant
to be performed under this Agreement. Such changes, including any increase or
decrease in the amount of Consultant's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon
by City and Consultant shall be effective as amendments to this agreement only when in
writing.
SECTION 12
Indemnity
Consultant agrees to indemnify and save City and its agents and employees harmless
from any and all liability, claims, damages or injuries to any person, including injury to
Consultant's employees and all claims which arise from or are connected with the
negligent performance of or failure to perform the work or other obligations of this
agreement, or are caused or claimed to be caused by the negligent acts of Consultant,
his agents or employees, and all expenses of investigation and defending against same;
provided, however that this indemnification and hold harmless shall not include any claim
arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its agents or employees.
No suit shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City, unless a claim has
first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the
City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference
as if fully set forth herein.
SECTION 13
Standard of Care
Service performed by the Consultant under this Agreement will be conducted in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinary exercised by members of the
profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations.
Consultant will be reporting the findings actually observed and will not render a
professional opinion concerning site conditions other than those actually observed.
7
Ib ,)3
SECTION 14
Insurance
Consultant represents and warrants that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed
by it is and are protected by worker's compensation insurance and that Consultant has
such coverage under public liability and property damage insurance policies which the
Consultant deems adequate. In addition, the Consultant will provide the following
certificates of insurance to the City prior to beginning work:
Evidence of Statutory Worker's Compensation coverage plus $1 million
Employers liability coverage.
Evidence in the form of a Certificate of Insurance and Policy Endorsement, or
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1 million combined single limits
which names the City of Chula Vista as additional insured.
All insurance carriers shall comply with the items listed below:
A. Listing by the State Insurance Commission as a company authorized to
transact the business of insurance in the State of California.
B. A Best's Rating of "A", Class V, or better.
C. Where a company is not included in Best's, it must show by convincing
evidence that its financial responsibility is equal to or better than the rating
set forth in 'B' above.
Said policies shall contain a provision that the same cannot be canceled
without at least thirty (30) days notice to the City.
SECTION 15
DisDutes
In the event that a dispute should arise relating to the performance of the services to be
provided under this Agreement, payment shall be as later determined by arbitration, if the
City and the Consultant agree thereto, or as fixed in a court of law. Should that dispute
result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all
reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including court costs and attorney's
fees. -
8
Ib,//f
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Ryals and Associates, have executed this Agreement
on this day of , 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I hereby approve the form and legality of the foregoing Agreement this
, 1991.
day of
CITY ATTORNEY
(CMF jCONTRACT JRY ALS.AGR)
9
Ih' )5
RYALS & ASSOCIATFS
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
NOVEMBER 1, 1991 TO OCTOBER 31, 1992
TITLE RATE
Principal/Project Manager $ 75.00
Relocation Agent $ 65.00
Senior Acquisition Agent $ 65.00
Acquisition Agent $ 55.00
Clerical $ 20.00
I~../b
RYALS & ASSOCIATES
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY RATES
NOVEMBER I, 1992 TO OCTOBER 31, 1993
TITLE RATE
Principal/Project Manager $ 82.00
Relocation Agent $ 72.00
Senior Acquisition Agent $ 72.00
Acquisition Agent $ 61.00
Clerical $ 22.00
lb. '7
i 7265.4
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
Title 1
DI".7
CIIIIa 1If_
f 7266. BevIew by pubUc entity' or reIostlOD appeals board
(a) U a relocation appeals board has been established pursuant
to Section 33417.5 of the Health and Safety Code, a city by ordinance
may designate the board to hear appeals from all public entities, ex-
cept those state agencies which have an appeal process, on the e~l-
blllty for, or the amount of, a payment authorized by this chapter.
(b) Any person aggrieved by a determination as to eligibility
for, or the amount of, a payment authorized by this chapter may
have the application reviewed by the public entity or by the reloca-
tion appeals board If authorized under subdivision (a). The review
of a determination by a community redevelopment agency may only
be made by a relocation appeals board established pursuant to Section
33417.5 of the Health and Safety Code.
(Added by Stats.1974, c. 47, p. 102, i 3.8, eff. Feb. 28, 1974.)
;,
eGlDplalDI ID .d
I'IJD, authority Co
pjaiu tb.t _ron,
Superior Strut .
OokloDd (1977)
AJId 1187.
2. H..,I...
AllhooCh C.U(,
Jaw d.... Dot ex)
iDe lad tile faltin
reJ0C8tioD beDefit
f.i,ly ImPDrted
trhiell an,. .<<<<fie'
City of Loa ADa-el
CoI.Rp.,. 188, 81
AI.hOllCh "'....,
Dot ezpl'elllllb In',
.'dch eYideo'ce II
auch feQuirt'ment. .
the ,evie... proceaJ
aet. of . coademn.
dernlud of IDY per
termiaadon .. to f
of PIIlmeDt author
Ilataace 18w. Ch)
Superior Court fo
(1973) 128 CoI.Rp
a. ....u...
Where .pplle.at f
ariaiac by .-Inu. of
public eadty ".. .
admiDI.tratf\'e eh.uu
jta: faUure to Heir
tit'. IDlzulamu wu
rior Strut 4:: Hanl'el
IoDd (1977) ltO CaI
1187.
Tea..1 who filled
D( thlo '_00 wf.h .
"'Iocotioo .....(1.. ,
writ of IDADdamu. di
iDe .utllorit, to pa)
pedtion for writ of a
for I!IODey" Within
ment. of formal fWn.
.... ..thorlt, II .
ProteedOD of owner or OC!eapant. other proYlalODll of law ~'fbaa .....ter proteetf.OD thaD
10 proridod .., thIo _.. _ 11212.
DDlDal DomoID "'180.
......." aer-. r tf.
c.J.8. EmlDal DomoID 1188 .1 oeq.
Notao of II, rld_
I. I. ......,
........(.1 eIIlm.Dt for "'....1100 IS'
peue. tJllcurnd when property w.. t.ken
for publfe .. .... Dot added to IW.nI
of .ttDrD., f_. SaporlDr 81rDI .. BoD-
ier Co. Y. Port of Oakl.Dd (19771 ltO
CoLRptr.1I1Ii, 12 C.AJId 887.
Hlotorlcal Nol.
Form., I 7288. .dd.d by 8"u.1989, c. Derlv.tlDn: Former I 7288. odded h,
1489. p. 3Q,I3. I 1. p'D,idi.C (Dr .10. fiD.'. 8t1U.I989. Co 1489, p. SOfa, 11.
It, of re,oin.. by public entity of p.yment
elirlbUity or .mount, ..as repe.led by
8t1U.1974, c. 47. p. 102, I 3.3.
Croll aet...-
Protection of oWller or occupant, otller pro't'iaion. of Jaw ~YiDI' .....ter proteedcm thaD
10 prDridod b, thIo _liDO, ... 11212.
.
,
f 7267. Gale
In order to el
erty by lll'eeme,
conaestlon In the (
the public Proerar.
acquisition practJc,
ticable, be cuJded
elusive, except thaI
1 and Section 726~
......." atk:. 1TI
lIuuldpol Corpo",IIODl "'717. C.J.8. IIlllllclpol Corpo",IIDDI I 1808.
.,
,. ....r.. I
1"..Ut, .f _.... 4
Hurt... 2
....11I.... I
"1.1.. I
NoteI otltIc-lf-rR.
I. I. ......,
Wh.", port .othorlll permitted oaIt to
.. h......ht optDl' It hI WI, of C!DIIIplliDt
for breach of d1lt1 aDd ........ tbereb,.
oIlowIDc .tltul. of IIIIIItllIooo for fill.,.
754
.'
or-
-:;-.
/(,.,/~
'l'iUe 1
011'.7
RELocATION ASSISTANCE
5 7267
5 7267. 0aIdeIInea for public ..ClUes
In order to encourage and expedite the acqulaltlon of real prop-
erty by qreements with owners, to avoid Utlptlon and reJjeve
congestion In the courts, to usure eonaIstent treatment for owners In
the P\lblic procrams. and to promote public confidence In public land
acquisition practices, public entities IhaD, to the createst extent prac-
ticable, be IUided by the Prov:lalons of SectIons 7267.1 to 7267.7, in-
clusive, except that the prov:lalons of IUbdlv1sIon (b) of SectIon 7267.-
1 and SectIon 7267.2 Ihall not apply to the acqulaltlon of any ease-
755
,.te. proteetlae tIwI
eomplaint hi eclmJJaUtradn "DClamua to
IUD, luthorif7 couJd Dot be beard to com.
plain tbat _10_ Procedure wu employed.
Superior Strut " BIDc.r Co. Y. Port of
OaklaDd (1877) 140 Col.1Ipt.. lilli, 72 C.
A.8d 887.
2. Hu"."
Althou,h CoUforula rel_doD ...t....
law doe. Dot .sprea), provide for hear.
ta, aDd tll. takiDI' of evid~Dce 00 ..ue of
"locatioD knlfite, luch requirementa are
fairly imported b)" tbe reyjew Procel.
which aD)' .,crieved peraon may demand.
City of Lo. AD"." v. Dorko. (1876) 132
CaI.Rpt.. 188, 81 C.A.8d 444.
AJthoul'h relocation ...tlace Ja.. doe,
Dot eapre"lly P1'Ovide for a llearial' It
which evidence f. required to be takea,
aucll requirelneDtl .re fairly imported by
the review Proce'l which rhf. lection ez.
leta of . eondemnlDJt t)ublic entity on tile
demand of any perRon nrrrin~ by a de-
termination .. to eliribilitJ' for or .mount
of payment .uthorised by relocation .._
ai.t.Dce Jaw. City of MouDt.ln View,',
Superior Court for SaDta Clara Count).
(19711) 128 CaI.Rpt,. BII8. 114 C.A.8d 72.
I. ......m UI
"uere .pplicant for relocation upenae.
.rialDC by virtue of .cquisition of land by
public entity.... not required to punue
administrative ch.nnels in fint futlnce,
Ib failure to aeek review by admiDiatra.
dYe mand.mu. wu Dot Improper. Supe.
rior Strut &: Ban,er Co. v. Port of Oak.
laud (1977) 140 CoI.Rpt.. 11111, 72 C.A.8d
887.
TenlDt ..ho falled to ezhauat remedie.
of thia aection with rupeet to requelt for
mac.tioD beDeflb .... Dot atitled to
writ of .aDuma directin, the eoDdemD.
lor authDritl to pay nob booeflto; the
petitloa for writ of ...aDetate ..u . uclaim
for moaey" within IlWldatory require.
meat. of formal fUia, with the eoac:Iema.
lor aDthoril1 .. a prereqalalte to &Dy
lID t 188 et .....
..rio. Strut " BeD-
Jekl.Dd (1877) 140
'" 887.
ppeab board
llished pursuant
.ty by ordinance
Olic entitles, ex-
'IS, on the ellgi-
111 this chapter.
u to eIlgibl1Jty
Is chapter may
r by the reloca-
I). The review
gency may only
Na11t to SectIon
t 7288. added bl
0&3. t 1.
.ter protecdoa dIaD
rporetlo.. t 1808.
. permitted nit to
, ".y of eomplaiDt
J dolDO,.e. thereb,
altodo.. for fUIDr
J~' "
-
------------
eoart PI"ONed!Q8 pl'OYtded b7 .tatute.
BaIaa v. Bou'heet. Reo_doD ..d Perk
DIaL (App.1978) 180 CaI.Rpt.. 838.
LHaee. who operated diaper -nice oa
....ed premia.. &lid wbo w.. compelled to
dfaooadaue hia buia... wben city lOurht
to acquire tl.e propert, for Itreet ADd re-
lated purpoeu. eoaId aeet to reco"er atat.
ator, fized relocadon payment in tbe con.
demaadon actioD; bowever. leaee, who
had e:lhlulted bi. admbd.t,.tive remedie.,
wa. required to Proceed by WIY of ero..
eomplalDt MekiDC admiDiatrative mind..
IDa. ratber thlD by WI, of Inlwer to
eft,'a eomplaint in emmeDt domain, City
of Mountain View Y. 8uperior Court for
&nt. Clara County (197~) 126 Cal,Rptr.
BII8. 114 C.A.8d 72.
It a condemnee ha. been denied claimed
relocation benefita b, ad,'en. action of
the condemnlaK public entity on ita "re.
1'Ie." of hi. elaim by ita &overoinr body
or other approprinte authority, .0 that
eGndemDee lIu e:lbau.ted IIi. admiDilt,..
dve remecliu, hil only judicial remed)' lie.
ID petitionln, tbe luperior court for relief
ill admiDiat,.tin lDIDdamua. Id.
4. F'aallly if 'eol.loo
Deci.loD of public endt, .. to PAyment
of relocatiO.D~ ezpeaaea .fter property Ja
taken for public purpose il fJnal only a.
to ,ueadon. of f.ct. Superior Strut 4:
HftD,.. Co. v. Port of Oekl'Dd (1877)
140 Col.1Ipt.. 11111. 72 C.A.8d 887.
I. Re.le..
Where port .uthority'. Procedure for
....in& on elaima for relocation upenlea
prorided for DO tudmoDY, DO fact.findIDc
determJ.nadoD ud DO Opportunit" to h.t
...rd OD. part of claimant, dalmant ....
DOt reqDlred to _k aclmlDfatredve revI.w
before ftJiD, IbI complaJDt for .ueb reloca.
tlon es.peDle. III IDperior eourt. Snperior
Strut " BaD'" Co. V. Port of OaklaDd
(1971) 140 Col.1Ipt.. lilli, 72 C.A.8d 887.
. 7267
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
Title I
Diy. 7
5 7267.:
Befon
entity shal
sation ther
ty for the J
be less tha
value of au
value of I'E
caused by
i qUlred, or
t IUch imprl
within the
I prded In d
t entity shar"
I written sta
tablished a;
er occupied
dential unit
a copy of tl
priate, the
damages to
(Added by :
878, II.)
~
, The 1878 at
MDteDee "let!
the appraiaal.
Prope", aequ
,m4.
ProtKtiOD of .
10 proYld.
ReloeatiOD ..
L.J'. 114.
Emmal Dom
5 7267.3
The cor
be 10 8Cbedl
ment, rliht-of-way, covenant, or other DOnposse&sory Interest In real
property to be acquired for the construction, reconstruction, altera-
tion, l!IIlarcement, maintenance, renewal, repair, or replacement of
lUbJUrface sewers, waterlines or appurtenances, drains, 8eptic tanks,
or storm water drains.
(Added by Ststs.1971, c. 1574, p. 8160, I 10. Amended by Ststs.1976, c.
~, p. 682, II.)
HlRnlcalNote
ft. 187Ii ..._at _rted tII. g- Form.r I '/28'7 wee __beNd I '/28'7.-
__. 8 aDd ....aded b7 8tete.l971, .. 1574, p.
1180, I 8.
0- Itef_
PIGpen, aeqaleldODI .., po"'..... or _elllD.ldon, eoutroetlOD of tIaIII _00, ...
Im4.
Protection of oWller or oeeupaat. other proftalooa of Jaw p.me .reater protection than
10 proYlded .., tIaIII _0, H. I 7272.
Emm.ot Domalo "'130.
LIbrarr a.L. el,
c.J.8. EmlDeot DomaIo 1188 el _.
..... 01 ~
I. ,. ,e. era'
Clt,'. faDure to foUaw pid.UDea for yene eGademaarioD. Toeo Yo City of Saa-
aeaotiadDI with IaDdoWDt'f uDder thl. .ee. ta Barbar. (1979) 1Ut CaLRptr. 812, 88
tIoD eoaJd Dot create eaut of action iD iDe C..A.8d 664.
5 7267.1. Aeqaisitlon by negotiation; appraisal
(a) The public entity shall make every reasonable effort to ac-
quire expeditiously real property by negotiation.
(b) Real property shall be appraised before the initiation of De-
aotiations, and the owner, or his designated representative, shall be
liven an opportunity to accompany the appraiser during his inspec-
tion of the property.
(Added by Ststa.1971, c. 1674, p. 8161,111.)
0- Itef_
Properl1 aeqaleltloo.o b7 po_ or " '-~ft.don, eoutroetiOJ1 of tIaIII HetIon, HI
Im4.
ProteetIoo of ......or or _I, otller .....- of law st'flDc peater __ tIwI
10 proYlded b7 tIaIII HetIon, _ I 7272.
IIadaoot DomaIo "I..
LIIInr7....~ tf.
C-l.8. Emmal DomaIo 1222 el l1li.
..... 01 DI . .
I. le..._ lllat properl1 .. --'red for pobJIe -.
_ ge_ of _r of _al.... Baperlo. 8trut . Haole. Co. Y. Port of
_ 10 _ pre",-" to _at of reo 0UIa0cI (1877) 140 OoLBpl.. 11111, '12 C.
...._ _ IIot Is 10 ~....,.Ired ~ 1187.
'766
.
DI...7
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
f 7267.3
'1'Itle 1
Stab.19711, Co
I 7267.2. IIIIt t!OIIIpaatlOD: offer of lair market wahle: writ-
.... 8&afemeDt: I..."'" of appralal
Before the initiation of nerotlatlons for real property, the public
entity shall establish an amount which It believes to be just compen-
aatlon therefor, and shall make a prompt offer to acquire the proper-
ty for the fun amount 10 established. In no event shalIlUch amount
be less than the public entity', approved appralaal of the falr market
value of IUch property. Any decrease or Increase In the fair market
value of real property to be acquired prior to the date of valuation
caused by the public Improvement for which IUch property Is ac-
quired, or by the likelihood that the property would be acquired for
IUch Improvement, other than that due to physical deterioration
within the reasonable control of the owner or OCCUpant, will be disre-
garded in determining the compensation for the property. The public
entity shall provide the owner of real property to be acquired with a
written statement of, and summary of the basis for, the amount it es-
tablished as just compensation. Where the property Involved Is own-
er occupied residential property and contains no more than four resi-
dential units, the homeowner shall, upon request, be allowed to review
a copy of the appraisal Upon which the offer Ii based. Where appro-
priate, the just compensation for the real property acquired and for
damages to remaining real property shall be separately stated.
(Added by Stab.1971, e. 11174, p. 8161, I 12. Amended by Stab.1978, e.
878. 11.)
erest In real
:tIon, altera-
Jlacement of
II!ptic taIiks,
..bored' '1287.,
171, e. IG7~, p.
bIo HOdOJl, ...
pro_oo tIwa
188 ot oeq.
Y. Clt1 of Bu.
aLRptr. 812, SS
~ort to ae-
BlllorIeaJ Note
The 1978 amendment werted the fifth
latence relatille to review of . copy of
the appraiaal.
iBtlon of De-
ive, shall be
, his Inspec-
.
0- ..,_
Proport1 __tIou b, "'..- or -_dOJl, -raetloo of thIo -.d0Jl, ...
. 7274.
Protoedoo of own.r or ......PIOt. oth.r proYillou of law 81..... _tor p_ tIwa
10 Prootdod bJ thIo HOdOJl, ... . 7212.
...._OJI,-
protoedoD tIwa
Law ......~.. .....
a_doo auIotuee. (1172)' PoeIfie
LJ. 114.
l:mJaoot DomaID "'1e11.
1.IIIru7'" II
c.J.8. EIaIaoot DaaaaJa . 222 ot 00<1.
:122 ot oeq.
f 7267.3. 8ehedallllg -.traetIon or development: wrlttea DO-
CIce: CIme
The construction or development of a public imProvement shall
be 10 scheduled that. to the areatest extent Pr&ctlcabJe, DO person
767
for pablle _.
Co. Y. Port of
pt.. lilli, 72 C.
. 5:-.:
....
JIo~ )../
~
.'
f 7267.3
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
Title 1
DIT.7
Jawfully occupyina real property ahal1 be required to move from a
dwe1lln&. 8IIBWIling a repJacement dwelling will be available. or to
move his business or farm operation, without at least 90 days' writ.
ten notice from the public entity of the date by which IUch move Is
required.
(Added by Stata.1971, Co 1174. p. 8161.118.)
I. I. ....r..
Where toDd,mDor'. acqalaldcm of por.
don of eoDdemDuI' IaDd aDd . buUdiD.
for atreet improvement rnuJted In DO
..tinued iDterruptioD. of CODdemlteel' ac-
... to the remainder property. there wu
DO bali, for eWmed .ward of loa. of rea.
IIOUbJe ratal .,alue. Lo. AII,ele. Couut)'
Y. Smith (1876) 127 CalIIptr. 666. 611 C.
~748.
Propert, aeql
I 7274.
ProteetiOD of
10 prorid
EmiDeDt Dol
! f 7267.f
,
J Uany
the power (
. condemnati
t It IleCH5ar. I
r fact of the .
. (Added by S
t
.
.
.
i Property....
i I 7274.
ProtectlOD of f
ill proold,
Emba...t Do.
0"
f 7267.7
,
Uthea
remaining s:
economic I'f
the entire p]
(Added by St
1'roper17 aeqal
. 1 7274.
Prot.etl.. of 0
10 prooldo<
f 7267.8.
(a) AD
mentJll,yln(
; a- w_
Propen, aequDltiou ~ pa...... or ~r t--...tioD., eoutruetioa of tIaJ. MetlOD, 11M
17274.
Prot.etlo. of owoer or """"_t, oth.r proYlol_ of law""'" _t.r prot_ thaD
ill prorided h7 tIdo ~ _ 1 7272.
UIInrJ Lh. I
K1IIIiclpal Corporatlou "'814(1). CJ.8. K1IIIicIpaI Corpora_ 1 UOO.
No&. 01 DII- Iv..
f 7267.4. Pair NlltaI value; mort-term oeeapler
U the public entity pennlts an owner or tenant to occupy the
real property acquired on a rental basis for a abort tenn. or for a pe-
riod subject to termination by the public entity on abort notice, the
amount of rent required aball not exceed the fair rental value of the
property to a abort-term occupier.
(Added by Stata.1971. c. 1674. p. 3161, 114.)
Crau W........ .
Property 1...111110.. .7 pa_ or ....,.....110.. .....roctI.. of thIo o.etIoo, ...
1 7274.
ProteetioD of owner or OC!CDpaa.t, other pronmoDa of .. IiriDa .reater protection than
10 provided .y thIo o.etIoo, ... 1 7272.
Emba...t DomolD t::>244.
Ubrarr ...~ 11 eel
C.J.8. Embaeot Domo!o 1128.
f 7267.5. <JoercloD to compel apoeemeJIt OD prlee
In no event 8ha11 the public entity either advance the time of
condemnation, or defer oegotiations or condemnation and the deposit
of funds In court for the use of the owner. or take any other action
coercive In nature, In order to compel an qIeement on tile price to
be paid for the p.""",. ty.
(Added by Stata.1971. Co 167" p. 8161.116.)
768
/ b '.22.
Title I
j to move from a
e available, or to
ut 90 da)'a' wrlt-
lIch such move JII
Diy, 7
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
f 7267.8
of tlaito NetIoa, ...
....r ProI..IlOII .....
I
....
~i)
.'!.
~
CroII"'~ -r
Property aeqaleldou b pa...... or -. --.dOII, __011 of tIaito _.... ...
. '/214.
Proteedo.. of ......r or _.... otIa.r pnmoIou of Ia... IMq .....r ~ tIau
to ProYlded b tIaito -..... ... . 72'12.
LIIIru7 ....
c.J'.8. EmilI.... Domah1I224.
EmilI.... Domalll ....170.
.
5 7267.6. OoIIclelllJlatlOD p"-<<lillgs; IutltatlOD by pubUc eJI-
tit)' IuCead of by owuer
U any Interest In real property JII to be acquired by exercise of
the power of eminent domain, the public entity Ihall institute forma]
condemnation proceedings. No public entity Ihalllntentlonally make
It necessary for an owner. to institute Jep] Proceedinp to prove the
tact of the taking ot his rea! property.
(Added by Stab.1971. c. 1574, p. 8162.116.)
Craa IW_
.
Property lequi8fdoDI ., parcltue or eODCIeauaadoD, eoutracdOD of thia HCtiOD, ItH
I '/214. .
ProtectiOD of OW'Der or oet"UpaDt, other pro'rialODI of Jaw ttriDa puter ProteetfOD thaD.
Ie prorided bT tIaIe ...do... ... I 72'12.
>'PO"do.. . 1100.
prope",., there ....
..rd of loa of 'fl.
~ ADl'eJea CoUDrJ'
eI.1!PIr. 866, l1li C.
to OCcupy the
n, or tor a pe.
Irt notice, the
J value ot the
EmilI.... Domalll ....166.
LIttnrJ.... ~ '1
C~.8. EmilI.... Domah1 . 209.
5 7267.7. AcqalsltlOD of _tire property; avolclaDee ot _
aomJe J'I'",n...t
tlIa ~I... _
pro.eodoa tIau
U the acquJllitlon ot only a POrtion of a property would leave the
remaInina portion In such a ~pe or condition .. to constitute an un.
economic remnant, the public entity ahall offer to and may acquire
the entire property It the owner 10 desires.
(Added b:r Stata.1e71, c.11l74, p. 8162, 117.)
a.. ...
PNperty oeqaIeJdou b pardwe or -'--udOll, ";'>t...ttoo. of tIaito _.... ...
. . '/214.
~OII of ......r or _.. otIa.r pnmolou olio... 11m. .....r ~ tIau
to prorided b, tIaito --. _ I 72'12.
1129.
:betfmeot
the deposit
ther action
lie Price to
f 7267.8. awe. aud rep...tIou of pahUc _tl..; priority of
federal law
Ca) AD public entities ahall adopt rules and I'I!I\I!ations to imple-
ment payments and to admlnJllter relocation aaIstance under the
7119
110..).3
.
. .
I 7267.8
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
Title 1
01...7
Provisions of this chapter. Such rules and regulations Iha)) be In
confonnlty with the euldellnes adopted by the Commission of Housing
and Community Development pursuant to Section 7268. Such rules
and regulations shall, to the fullest extent possible, also be consistent
u to federal and nonfederal projects.
(b) Notwfthstandlna the ProvisIons of subdivision (a), with re-
~ to a federally funded project, a public entity Ihall make reloca.
tlon assistance payments and Provide relocation advisory aasJatanee
u required under federal law.
(Formerly I 7267, added by Stata.1969, c. 1489, p. 1043, I I, eff. Sept. 6,
1969. Renumbered I 7267.8 and amended by Stata.1971, c. 1674, p. 8160, I
t. Amended by Stata.1972, c. 1807, p. 2607, 11.)
,1II.ed by publi
Ban,er Co. v
Jf() C.J.Rprr. n
Where re)OCI!
Dot required t(
authority for f
location after f
5 7268.
IoCb) Payments UDder the provillion. of
thie chapter by the Department of Public
'Works for propert, IcquialtioD' ,hall be
ill .<!COrd.nce with hell me. Ind ncuJe-
tlOD' U Iban be adopted b)' tile depart-
Dlent.
"Ce) Such reruJ.tioD' ,hill pro\ide that
the payment. aDd ...iltance required of .
public entity UDder thi. chapter ,han be
adminiltered in . mlUDer that 'I fair aDd
rea.onable aDd .1 uniform .1 practicable.
The re,ulation, Iban allo provide tbat the
payment, Iban be made aa promptly ..
pouibJe or, in hardaldp eaus. in advance.
ID addition, the reruladona ,haJ1 pro\ide _
reaaoDable milea,e limitation in determill.
ml tbe actual and fUlOnable t:lpeDJe in
mo\'jDI a bu.iDe., for purpose. of SectiOD
7262."
Seedo.. ~. (I of 8..Io.J972. .. 1807. p.
2608, provide:
"See.~. The Lerialatu.. IIIte.d. that
tile promio.. of thi. ..t .h.1I .Id III the
aniform admiDiltratioD of relocatioD a'-
I.tanee b)' public atitie. tbroul'hout tbis
ltate.
"Sec. 8. Tbi. act .haD become opera-
dye one y..r after ihl effective date."
(a) Th
shaD adopt I
chapter and
by public en!
(b) Th.'
Ihall, to thE
Presldentla1
President of
requirement
ty Acqulslti(
regulations I
(c) Sue
anee require
tered In a m,
ticable. ThE
made u pro
addition, suc
In detennlnl
nessforpW'l
(d) In E
Community I
log out the p
(e) The
shaD provide
draftin& and
and to admlni
(Added by Su
Stata.1971, c. 1
J 42 U.8.C.A. .
IIIaorIcaI Noie
a- ..,_
I'WD~ of rule. ad nplad_ adopted pu......1 to thla _0', _ . 7281.11.
Protection qf OWDer or oecvpant, other proYkiODa of III. ..viDe ,reater protection tbaD
Ia proricled hy thIa _0" _ I 7272.
Notee fII D.c........
I. I. ....... ba iliad. wlthiD 18-mODtII lImilod_ perl.
Wh... POrt ..tborlly Imprope.ly faDed ell, a1rit for ....h _do. n_ ...
to Idopt .......tion. wbich woaJd h..,. re. tlmel" when broul'ht 14 month, after
""reel tbat elaima for _dOD ax......e. elalmul _red from NO! propertJ' ae.
760
The 1911 amendment renumbered tlte
HCtlon and rewrote the test, which previ.
ou.ly read:
"Payment' under the proviaion. of tllil
ehapter Ihan be made to eUribJe perlOn.
III aecordRnce with luch rule. and rel'ula.
dona a. Ihan be adopted b)' tbe State
Board of Control for property acqui.itiona
., . ltate a.en~)', or the I'ovemn, bod~'
of any otber public entity, for property
acqui,itioDI by luch endty. Payment.
..de ill reJation to property acqui.itioD
for I'OIId. aDd .treehl hy public entide.
oth., than the .tate _h.n be made in ae-
eordaoee with the provi.ion. of Arti~le 3.5
(commencin& with Section 156) of Chap-
ter 1 of D!,"i.ion 1 of the Streeu and
meb..lY' Code and .u~h rulu and recuta-
doni U Ihan be adopted by tbe State De.
pertment of Public "'ork.."'
The 1972 amendment rewrote the .te.
don, which pre'riou.l)' read:
"(a) Except a. provided in aubdivi,ioD
(b). Plyment. under tbe pron,ionl of this
ehapter .hlU be made to eUcible per.on.
ID. aceordance with .uch rule. and recula-
don. .. IbalJ be adopted by the State
Board of Control for propert)' acqui.itions
b)' a .tate a,eney, or the l'ovenUn, body
of III)' other public udty. for property
MIQlliaidOl1l ~)' .uch entitJ.
.;
,
,
t
j
i
f
The 1971 _II
department of J
riIIecI 10 adopI ...
._-;:~
Title 1
maD be In
I ot Housing
Such rules
e consistent
Di".7
RELOCATION ASSISTANCE
f 7268
tpdred b7 ...bU. ...d<7. Superior 8trut "
Boocer Co. v. Port of Oakland (19771
140 CoJ.Rptr. Iilli. 72 C.A.3cI 987.
Wh.re reJoeadOD 'l:peD.I" elaimut "..
IIOt required to PNHDt claim before port
aathorit). for e:r:peDae. lDyolved ID fill re-
IDeation after aDthoritJ' okaIDed ita prop.
en, lor pabUe ..., .... aatIaorltJ'. ad.
IDiDtlt...ttve proeedarea were JDadequlte,
applloabJe UmltadODO period _ that ...
tabUobeel ID .._tloo pldoliDu aDd nit
.1. Dot barred b7 UmttatiODI .beD Wed
wltblD 18 DlOOth. after eIaImaot'. tlcbt of
actto. aceraed. Id.
1), with N-
ue reloca.
I assistance
<<om. open.
edate."
f 7268. GakleliDea by _",.00I9D of bouIDg UId _1IDIty
developmeDt for paymeuu aDd rei_ClOD ....taDce;
..utauce to public eutltles
(a) The Commission of Housing and Community Development
maD adopt guidelines for the Implementation ot paymenu under this
chapter and for the uniform administration of relocation assistance
by public entitles carrying out the provisions ot this chapter.
(b) The Commission of Housing and Community Development
shall, to the fullest extent possible, conform such guidelines to the
Presidential Guidelines promulgated by the executive office ot the
President of the United States, Office ot Management and Budget, the
requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Proper-
ty Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91~),' and the rules and
regulations promulgated pursuant thereto.
. .
(c) Such guidelines shall provide that the payments and assist-
ance required of a public entity under this chapter iliaD be adminis-
tered in a manner that Is fair and reasonable and as uniform as prac-
ticable. The guidelines shall also provide that the payments shall be
made as promptly as possible or, In hardship cases, In advaDce. In
addition, such guidelines shaD provide a reasonable ml1eage limitation
in determining the actual and reasonable expense In moving a busi-
ness for purposes ot Section 7262.
(d) In adopting such guidelines the Commlllion of Housing and
Community Development shaD consult with the public entities carry.
ing out the provisions of this chapter.
(e) The Department of Housing and Community Development
shaD provide consulting and technical assistance to public entities In
drafting and amending rules and regulations to implement payments
and to administer relocation assistance under this chapter.
(Added by Stats.1969. e. 1489, p. 8048, II, eff. Sept. 6, 1969. Amended by
Stats.1971, e. 1674, p. 8162, 118; Stats.1972, e.1807, p.1607, 12.)
142 U.S.C..a.. I f801 .t ......
eff. Sept. 6,
'4. p. 8160, I
pro'riaiOll1 of
'Dat of PubUe
idoD' .ball be
u ODd ..pl..
I' the depart-
D provide that
required of a
.pter Iban be
..t 10 fair ODd
u praetieable.
'"O'rid. th.t the
. promptJ, ..
~, ID "'.IDce.
,ball provide .
I ID determlD'
de tapeDle tD
... of SeetiOD
2, e. 1107. p.
mtnd. that
0011 aid ID do.
.......dOD u-
lrou,bout tJaI8
11.S.
........00 tbaD
itedOD' pori.
UpeDI.. ftl
DODtb. .fter
propen, ac.
....orIi:aJ Note
The 1871 ..,eodDlnt proYldeel that tbe plemlDt _011 aDder thIo ebapter b7 It
"partmezat 01 public: .orb ... autbo. &ad that the ,,",lraiD, bodie. of other
- to adopt rule. ODd replatlODl to 1m. pabUe IOdtl.., oth.r thOD ...ta .....01...
761
/~,).s
.-
;
.
j
j
1J.2~
... - -"'.. '15,GIIII. AaIIik......
(1M!) 161 CoUpor. 317. 101 c..u.J 14.
.-
GOVUIOIIINT COOl
I 7IK.L -yr-
1
-.... "---..,....
n1"'~ .a.....
I.
t
;
t
!
IWIt to
(h) No _ obaII be NquiNd '" _ from hIo or ber ........ "-- of .. __ .., .
pablic -tity, UDIIu . . . *---abJe ,NIt' --wit ~ . . . .Ii! ........ to . .,.-;;.....
(e) Far p... - of tIet.armIaiq tile applieabllit7 of nbdI,...... (aI. die pablle -*7 10 .......,
__led u a duly ...tboriIecI adiuiDiatniin bod7 of ilia alate tor tile P\1I]IGMa of IIIbdIftaioD (e) of
8ectfoa Q of tile ......... ud TuaIioD Coda.
(eI) . . . Subdhiaiou (Ii) obaII DOt appIJ '" . cIfapIacad _ who ...- ID writiDc willi die pablle
-*7 '" NmaiD ID oceupQq of die oequiNd dweIIiq u p.v,Jdod ill aubdtrialoe (e) of IIaeIioD T26I.
(A"'ODded bJ StaIa.1981. .; '18&. p. 1&71. f 4; Stata.11189. Co 828. f 8.)
_..~- -"'-
!IIi" I'U lill-.(.~..._ ....."'_1
----r .. 1 J' . ....... 1M ...... ............
--........, .. - -. (d).
~.
t
l
~
I
-. ..
.1919 . ._. 0 '~__iII
-.(d)."--(a)"(Io~_W..-.
..,
~.) II ..... r I' ..... II .. .......
... ... ........ -,..... ... ..... ........
-......__bo_.-. ...........
.on, - - ..... --. b..d................_
... ... _. .. _ ..... II ... ........ .
--... -.
"\11) No__bo.......__..._
"'_",iII .........,.........-,.__
II ..... . ....... . _ ill --.. (3) ",
. .0.__ (c) flI.... 7261........ IO.....
L-.M.." .....
T_ ........, ........ ..,....... .' . . ",
-.w ..-,...... . _....... ._
--.........- .. .m_",
- r'" I J' ....... Me&.. Y. ......
~ ",... Law (Afp. I DIoLI9M) 2.JQ CoUpor. I,..
I" CA.Jd m.
J. ....."'_
-, do)' -, ........ ", ao.. Codo I 72M
... .. ....,. . ..- - ill ...... .. _
---... .. ..........-.....
-....... . . ",--.---
... ....... ..... - -. _'0 A-,.
(Afp. , DIoLI9I9) U9 CoUpor. JtJ, III CoL<.," "'.
--
I TIll. ~.." ~. ,Adca-.; ~'JI.. 111'1... &).. .....I~. II..,
(a) ID addItioD '" die ~ NG1IiNd .., IIaeIioD 'IJ82, u . at of &CII(1dIIdaa. die JIIIbIIe etiIr
aIIaII .... . JI&1mBt to &1\1 attaeiIad JIoo.....tJ _ mMtiac die 1',,7 . of thIo aaetbi.
(h):!:!!! affeet.ed ... .h~ obaII.I;.. ~'.17 .:-= :: ~ ~"t" ,..':. ~
::t'i;' ~:; r:r :'" -= WI! tIoD of~.:!tIoD tor ~oiti,;~..... ,.:'i;.
~~"""'I, DOt to -- ~-two" -"'II fin hudrad doIIua 1122.1100), aIIaII be die
.......... &1\1. which equaIa die dacIiM ID ilia .. IIIIIrIat ...... oI'lIii ..., I:) 01 die
p.~t) _Iiaaaed .., tile -..IaItIoD .., tile pabIIe -titJ far aiIport P-. 11 01 GIber
.. p.......tJ ud . ..... ID dII _ of ill! p...,....c;,.
(eI) '!be -I, If &117. 01 actoaI daeIiDa ID fair mubt ... 01 ..... .--v IlIaD lie
dItmmiDed ~ to fuIoa aDd I'IIUIatiouo ad,opted .., die pabIIe ~ punuairt iio tII1I ......
'!be.... ud.......tioua IllaDIlmitJl&zmet .....1IIiI.11~1~::t: thiIM dI._" ,ID WhIoh
1IiI daeIiDa ID fair marbt ..me of ..... p...... tJ 10 iiIiI;d to 0111 .. .. JIh1*aI
.....ID ilia _ of oequiNd .......1:3. "'.
('- ,. bJ 8-.11811. Co as, f'.)' '.
.a .. nu RQ...._ J If - . J.... ....._ ~ . U .. lit' I 1 -. ..,
216
1t-,2k
- -------
GOVBRNMBNT CODB
_..-,.-
-. ..
n. 1M . ...... ... .u
_.u.aao.____
f'IIIT. "v' ..,-,.......-
-"'_.
L ..-"'
.~~:.~..,...~~ \~
f 'IIIT.1. ....-" ,......., aL..1Iat .
(a) '!be pubIIe etitJ IlIaD ....
__" +w-
(h) JIal~ obaII be appro
. I -'aIift,
Cl.. 11.4 tr mot ilia pIOpIIt
die iiiiiiiIuI ill _ ~ tho
ftIue.
~ .., Stata.1I8II. Co as, f
-"-''''
..' ...
.,919 " _..._
(Io~-..._"''''--''
--...
"11'7.1.1_ . ~III.
1.\ Prior to IOIoptIJII . ...m
>:t.. tor the oequlaitiou of
~be jut eomp-otioD t
~....; ti.. ..OPOrtJ f... the ,.
.-.ouable ~""'. ".. off..
offc by.- of. _tnet 0:
t a1IaJ1 die _I be ilia tho
::" propertf.'"" AD1.......I~ ... II>
the date '01 nJiIatiou c&IIMCI b:
:. IikeWlood that tile ~
=. daterlaIaIioII ~ dill
~I the OOIDF--.~ to
-m '" be oequlNd with . .
ialibliaMd .. jut oompauatiot
ud _tabla DO more
~"'.......OIIp)'ofllla..
_..-..... for die .... ..-..s-
-
lei M ..... ID nbdMllIaD (b).
~1NCI11IIa"
the..... _ut)
1& Offend tor aaII '" :D
~.-.&u: .t
(.& _ ,., .., StalLII82, Co lOE
Ic.It afa.l 1\ .-
11"-1.. .....
-
GOV8IINIIBNT CODE
-...
. --by.
! ~=:...~..u;.~o.
DC . . . J! _...... IIDIity 10 ....by
dodtriaIoD (a), tile ~nbdIriaioD(c)of
...... for tile,.."...
ill wriIIDc with tile pubJic
::: .:"....:!M.ioD (c) of BactioD 7268.
Co 828. I 8.)
..." --
"....... J
...... f .- ..... . .. fI
.-.... ""-'--' .,.......~. .
· -'-'J' .....-- ...... ~.. .,I....
~--..:. .. '11>"5_01
.. .... .. ... -. Mcc- Y. ......
:"... t:.. (AIP.'I ~IIN) 230~. 176,
301m.
· "- "Gov. Code I 7261
"-'..,<1. io~._
...., II> ..- ~ tor ... -.. -.
"~..::a;___",,~_
... -. CIon:ia ..._.
-......- 211......-301467.
-1m) 2S9 Col...... 393, ___
--
.ww-J _.
17; Jic......
. .....- tbe pub IID_.,
U · - of &eq1III......., of tbia MCtioa.
Iatiac tile ....--ta
aoqaiNd for Iirport
-. ~ ~...~ by !be poabJic IIDIity
ectad ~:.rti.. oeqalNd .........1,.
for oeq '&fIJO) obaIJ be tile
I hllDdNd =- P.~I, of tile
:tu. ~ for airport,.."... 01 otIIor
01 atfeetad ~ obaIJ be
It ~ ...................... ehaDter.
· public ;;:.. cirewDotaDc. ill Whid>
=" iiIiIid ... objotti.. p/IJIIcaI
I . I. . . .
"'1.I.A~ _ II . . .
I
i
..-----
~VDNIIBNT CODE
- .....~"-
-~I'.
1'- "" . __ OlIo ....... _.
... 'JS.aoo IDI2Uoo, .. _ . J........
'. fII7. G " h_ tar ...... .....
....".... 101 CA.Jd fU, ..aa..n -., 101 J.Q. 271, .., u.s.
J. II - IDJ, II L.IioUd UI.
T_ ., a., ".... ___ (1979> UJ ~. IU,
· CA.Jd 6U... ......1_ ., 162 eor.a;.... 210,
· 7JI7.z. I. I tIoio; P"", 1>...,...,...... ... ~...... ........... ~
l!) Prio. ... "'!oPtia&- · NIoJutioo of -.il7 ........... to Soctioo 1U5.2ao. aod 1Ditia~
.....IiatioDl lor the oeq1lioitioo of '-I ...........,.. tbe Pllb1ic IIDIity obaIJ -tabJioJJ ao &IDouot which it
be!lev. to be jut OOIDpeDlatioo !borelOJ', aod obaIJ mate ao off8l)lo tbe _ ... 0W8ere 01 '-rd
~ tbe JII'oI>eIti lor tile Iu1i &IDouot 10 -tail!iahecI. IID1eu tile _ IIIDDot be located witb
-liable di!iieoc:e. '11Ie ol1e. lDay be ~ 1IpOD tbe !oiIaJatiye 1IodT. ratilicatioo of tbe
oller ~ ~ of. -tract of IOQIIiI/tioo ...ldoptjQo of. -lotioo of ~... both. JJJ DO
_t tbe --WIt be ... t.bao tbe J1UI>Iic -titTo ~ IIIPNIIaI of !be lair martet oaIue 01
the J'I'Operty -:-ADy decroaM OJ' ~ ID tbe lair JDarbt oaIue ~ '-I ik....... t) to be lICQuired Prio.
to tile date '01 oaIUatioo C&uIed by tbe Pllblic ~t I... ~~ " IICQIIired. or by
tile likelihood that the jIroperty WOUld be lICQuired lor tbe t, other thao that due to
~~~ witbiIi UIi ~ -In>J oftbe 0i00er orOOClJpaot, obaIJ be ~ io
" tbe -.p-'Itioo lor tbe pro,..,ty. n.. Pllblic _Iity obaIJ Pft>ride the _ of '-I
JII\.a.crlL: be lClluired witb · wrIUeo .tatemQt of. aod ~ of !IIi IIuio lar, tile &IDouot It
.tahlia U jUt -...outioo. Whert the P."\>PUt1 ioY01veii .. _ T ~*' IWIideotial
~rty aod -taioe DO more t.bao lour IWIideotiaJ IIJI/te. the ""--W_ obaIJ, IIpoJJ requ.t, be
lIIoWocr to NYiew · 00JI1 of tbe IpJIraiqJ IIJIOD w!Iich tbe oller "bued. ...... ---"'Icbe.Put
~....tioo lor tbe '-I prc,..ty lICQaiNd aod I... .-.... to _......, '-I Pr':;':-~ I/JaII be
IOJIVatel1l1ated.
N~
"'- , ., .......~ - r u...._ ., -11 .......
117
/~'!~7
--
'7267.%
j
~
,
;
;
t
I
i
.
~
~
i
.
I
~
~
j.
I
I'
!
r
,
,
I
:
17267.2
-...... -.,-
- .. _.. J ... ..... .. ... ......
.. "... 11M _ ~..... poIoIic -"....
...-....-..,." - .. ........--.,-,
.... -.. ............ r ... _ ... ...
- -.... -.. --- -..........-
--"--, -...... - -... -
.... .... fir ...... ...... ~__l) ..........
~ 1M .. J...,.....*~iI..
........... ....."..... - - _ 10.......
... ...... be 6._~ ... ..... ... .._...... .....
--
....... ..................~..
~ _ r ........ .. ... 11M _
....... ---"'r ...___~.
-(a)....__(1I~
0..- -
-.- "........ __ to............ __
- to ... -. _ 0Id0" a.iI-.. t 1250.410.
, .... r1I .....,.. ... . ---<1._ III lIMe dIM a6r
-1IIiI__-__OIdo"CriI_
..... t 12A,.230.
10- I
-,,--
GOVDNIIBNT CODI
-_3
L 10_
'ftIt....~.... - . I-~ ....
- .. - ., .., poIoIic -" .... to ......
--" .. - ......._,,-,..
CIIr '" loa _ Y. an. (lob W_ Co. !Alp. I DilL
1917) 237 c.u,cr. ~ 112 CA.Jd IOOS.
J.__.
-.. . flI.......... ID ...,.. I'" .......
1IDIIiIieI......,.,...&. .. . flI........iI_
. . --. " -," ... - -, -
..... let III _ . all ...... 4r....... ....
.... " -..... CIIr" loa _ Y. an. (lob
W_ Co. (App. I Dl&.19I7) 237 CoLIIjoor. MI, 112
c.A.1d Jaos.
u.n ""-<Y -.. .. '- IIIiIII)' Caaoit-
.... -- - - - ... __........ to
.... oily - ---...... aoq 'I k .. _ .... to
-,....--....---...........
.... .... -,... CIIr" loa '- Y. _ (lob W_
Co. (App. I Dl&.19I7) 237 CoLIIjoor. 145, 112 c.A.1d laos.
'7H7.1. Coed ...tL._'JiI:... ......; 1uUtutioD.,....... ~ ~ ."7_
-- " -, ...,.. .... ". "
121.000 .. ... ""-" _. ".. -160.00O....
..-...---.....--
-.......,..- . IJ_,,--,
..., - ... -. CIIr" Lot AofoIoo Y. Tu..
(1913) 1'1 Col...... 229, 142 CA.Jd 694.
_it~
L la_
"-'>- ...... _ _did to -.. ... __ __
. .~-oiIy-_...~-'"
ciIy"~ ~ -~caldaetiDdrI 'J .. .
1Iao__....____....
o.toa
'7JI7.1. ...... aM I.. L~ .. .,.............. ........, 1o,MnI1a.
(a) AD public _dtioo ohaII adopt 1'1IIoo &ad ftI\IIatIoao to !mr' -....t pa~ta &ad to admiDiatar
. ............ ~ 1IIIder . . . lido ehaptar. 'nIeoe 1'1IIoo &ad ............. ohaII be Ia ~
with the . . . 1'1IIoo &ad """""tIo.. adopted D7iLo DapartmeDt of JIoaaIac &ad c-mUDitr
DonloplDeDt . . . .
III) NotwitbotoDcllaa . . . aahcItrioioa (a), with NIpaCt to a fadenDr faDded Jlllljeet, a public
eDtit;r ohaII make ...-..... ~ JI&1IMDtI &ad JIIIIridt "~1Ioe adtioorJ MIiI"'- u
raqaincl1lllder fedoraJ Ia..
(.-..ded b7 Stata.ll18O. .. lIlli, P. _. f 1; Stata.l". .. 828, f 12.)
.a'-IIA -. --.L. .....-- ~.., ...&_ ....T. U1_.., 11 T I ...
218
lb-)!
.
ooV8RNJIBNT CODB
_fII_'
........ If . . J
I. .1 A- If . . ;,:...... ..
..~"~,,_w...
"'--
,~ .. .....,. \llata.l.. Co
,,.. ......, ~ ....
I.' No paymeDt racoIoed b7 &II)'
~ Irr MY otato ltatuto or loa
F:::1liiCiiiiiiTu Law. Part 10 ( ,
Tuatloe Code, or the JIIDI< &ad Co
DiYiIioR Z of the IlaYaDDO &ad 'J'uI
~~~of~
_t of aid to which the NCIpIaa>
(A-Md b7 Stata.ll88,.. 1410.,'
-,,-
-. . . ...., .....
L . . .......... .... .........
~--""".~.I
-.... "
f mL QJoaoI-JIIIoUc oatIQ'; -
(a) If a ...lutioD II ::t:" _-=
tba ""'Iuioitloll of ~domaiD .
tba .-opertJ.~1 proYide ralocatloa
t"~ bJ poablic ...dtiaa JIll'
chapter &ad the pidaJiMo adapt<
parllIIDt to SectioD ,-
Y . .
ft., '11IiI ...... ..... DOt applJ
"" ........... with SectioD 100) of
=:'Iic _tiIiea which IN nbjact t
(A . ~ b7 Stata.l". .. 828, ,
'. tm. AtIJf ........, .......r1~
(a)"" ~tto ==
....17 to a of ~
...... tIo ~- ... ·
-- 011 or..._ :3. ... ....
--'-'^" If .... l""I"'" ... .
--.~ &ad If tba .. for I
-_. -'-'of_
_.I~r----.
......aJlood b7 a ~-=
~Dr~ LI,"-
...... &ad pablilIoMI ill a -..-
III) At tba tIma of ~ ... .
IIOIif)' tba poopartJ - 1m
(1) ",. pabIic ..-. pIaIII
..~. .'-
(I) MI1 ..,.......
_ aa&J ba ""'.oIar.
(Addad b7 \llata.1I8&. .. 1.. ,
r -I.........
GOVDNIIBNT CODB
a
~.... ... . 1-r."'4 ....
'WI! ~, "')' ,-:.Ii.. _) ...... .. _
-III -, J. ..............rJI~.
.. Y. -. Gob W_ Co. !Alp. I 11I&
...... N.I, m C4Jd _.
to,. .
~-........~~ -
"'1iI)'o' .. . "'__10_
... '" ~.. lor ..... dI) _
. .... ...... .......---... ......
.... tII) "'.. '- Y. _ Gob
... I Ili..III7) D7 ~. N.I, Ita
-.......... '- UIIiI)o ~
-------...
....--...,."...._~..
1od0lllil)___ r .
.. tII) "'.. '- Y. _ COb W_
ItI7) 237 ~. N.I, Ita CA.3d IODS.
., ...... '" ~-
":-111
-,IiI)'o_", .
- -, "'. -1'O.Dao...
--~-.....-
........ ......._"'''"'''''-7
- CO) '" r.. AatoIoo Y. TUa
.. ZIt, IG C4Jd ...
--.Ie ....--t fl tin fII
! .... r-.M~I partioa ill lach .
:lllblie atity IIIaU oft.. to . . .
, with tJIiI eba~r ~' after tile
: -,:,DI&Uon ~ ~ropenv;
eom .-boa for to .
.... law
.t pa,..ti uti to IIdmIniater
raIatiou IIIaU be .. ~..
,to of Boaainc uti IIDit1
..u, Iandod prvjoct, . pablie
..uoa adoi...q ....ce- u
12.)
''''.1 -h....
--- -,-_. h
8O~ CODB
.... .,....
-... .....,... - 2
'1277
.....,. -........ A"'__
... -.... .. ..... 10 ...... .......... ~
...._10__.._ u~-........
~ .. ...,. - - .,............. AI-
..... Y. ..... ClIaD) 1'1 CIoLa,or. 117. 101 CA.JoI 14.
a........,..o
--- """"!' "'- "'....... ...... .. -
.,....... - ~ - .... - ........ ..,
· ~ .. f 1M ~ ......1.... eo 1111. .. ... 1 J
.,.. .....", ~ I . __............. _ ..""'"
~ No ~t ~ br 11II1 .-- 1IIIder WI ...... 01' U !l!lant .."-tIoa 1NiI~
flat. ~te OI'!!!oioI ~ IIIaII be -'~J.... U -. for ~ Oftlii
w, witb 8octioa 17001) of DiftIiooi J of ue aDd
~ Code, 01' tbe ....... uti ~ Law. Part 11 (_-- ~ willa 8aeIioD _1) of
DhiIiaii II of tbe .....ue uti Tuaiioa Code:
/II} No ..-. _... III !!LaDY ........ 1I!!der WI oha_ WI! be - .. """ --. 01'
--- lii 11II1 ~, or JIIU>Jic uiIiiiiiCi lUll! 'DeII Pl7miDIa ILaD IIOt be dodacted fI'om the
-..at of alellio .-IIIih the ........t ~ ... .w be IIItItIod IIDCieJ' IIIJ otber ............ of law.
~-W br --.1188. Co 1410. 1 J.}
.... .,.......
L ...... .d...,..... ,
CaIbaio_~.... ......___
- -.. " .... ......- "'.,
........ W... AaCoLoo...Qado . 72ft, ... _ _
.......... 01..,.,...... . t..............
., ""1' ..d ~ .....,.,.. Ifonoy Y.
...... CA., (CaL) 1-' ""-311 _
· 717.. q,. ~ y'Uc IdV; -....... wICIt ~ ......
(a) 11 · NIOIaIloa " IIdapted IIDCieJ' Soetio.a u.a.880 of the Code ofa.g Proc.d_ __~ Iio
tbe...,a/oidoa of ~ br...u-t domain uti &be JIII'Ioo aatlaorioaej br ~~1Ioa 1io...,1ire
tbe JII'OpeJty br ...u-t domain ...,aireI the JIIOI- t) br PIII'ebaM. IlDiDelit 01' otberWioe,
.t JImoD IIIaII JII'OYide reIoQlioD ~ ....taDcO uti IIIaU mate an1 of the ~Ia "",aired
iiD"1i III&de br pablie "1iIieo PDraaant Iio &be JII'Ooioioea of WI ehoptM a:.~~~Wa
....... and the caideliaeo adoPted b7 &be n...;_....... of IIoaaa.C JDd ---.J' ~._t
.....aant to Soet;O" 7268. . ~ .'
. . . ~
.'.
~ 1hio IICUoD doeo BOt 17 Iio pablie a1iIItioo wIIieh _ aabjeet Iio:tbe JII'Oti%u of ArIicJe I
~ with Soetio.a .::tOf ~r 8 of Part 1 of DitioiOD 1 of &be PDliIie UtiIitioI Code 01' to
pabJic "1iIieo which _ .ahjeet Iio . . . WI .......
(1- ',d br Stala.1III8. Co 828. 1lJ.)
1 7Z77. Atru.-1IoJI '" ....... ........ Iw ...... 4oIIaod; ..... Ia ......
(a) 'n.e ~~t Iio DI'DYido!!!Pca1ioD ~ IIId ~ ........'" by tIIio ~1IIaII DOt
IppI7 Iio · of PI'OJ>ertj WIIicIi li Off_ fOl' I&/e 111 tile _. JIII>porty aoId at
-lion Dr forecIoo..... -, 01' ~ IIeIJI6 IDle! fDnaant Iio -.rt order Or -.rt
IIIIJI&niIion If the JII'OPerty ID &II, of the '-* -"... " lither -.,;tel br !be _ 01' "
.""""upitd, uti If till 011.. tor _ " IIOt IaiIaood b7 pabJic ..ut, ~ JIIanDtd _, ..
tIaa, 01' ~t of ~ Iaado, uti If. "'1Jrici " 6ir __ ftIue 01'..... U
~ br · ~ 1jIJIra/oei, uti If ... t.de.aJ IaDdo _ ~ .. tbe ""'!"iIioD.
-""ction, 01' JII'Ojeet ""-""'Pment. "Oftarad tor ..... ..... lither ad\_1aod tor ... ID .
,........1ioD of .-, eIreaIatioi. ,......."'" at lout _ . .... 01' Iioted rill . ~ _ &IIate
....... uti ,........"'" .. · III1IIIipIe 1IotIDa. ~ Iio 8aeIioD JII8'7 of tbe a.g Code. ,
~) At tile Ume of ...... an oftar Iio IIOqah "-root) __ _, ti.. (a,I, ..... .... aIIaD
aoIifJ &be .......t) - III wrIIiDc. of &be IoDciwiiii.
(I) 'J1oe pabJic atitT. .... lor .\.......... tbe "-root) Iio be ...... ... tbe ..... "(..
..-.-~. . . ..
~ u, -. ..... '..... uti -..a.. ..-Jdtd..... Iio .... law ..... .. "__I)
-- .., be ......., . . ..
UIWtd br ......1I8c, eo 141, f L ..' ~ J br ......1I8c, eo 1IJ8, 1 1.)
.'-11_";"_ ..- 1" ".:1; -. _., _II '. ...
119 '
!1",';..1
I ~~ _.
"
- --..
.;
,<.
!i
,i
"
if
.,
,
.
r
..
,<
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest III the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
NONE
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
NOT APPLICABLE
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
NOT APPLICABLE
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No ---1L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
NONE
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No..L If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
Person is defined as: '~ny individual, firm, co-paJ1nership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation,
estate, flust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and country, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision,
or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (\'!: \" \,
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) (\ ]
\ I \
\.J -'I I
Signature of contra
Date:
OCTOBER 14, 1991
/"
. applicant
[A-113v\:DISCLOSE.TXT]
RICHARD A. RYALS, PRESIDENT RYALS & ASSOC.
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Revised: 11130190J
THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA PARIT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest III the contract, Le., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
NONE
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
NOT APPLICABLE
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
NOT APPLICABLE
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No -L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
NONE
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, co-paJ1nership, joint venture, association, social club, fratel1wl organization, corpora/ion,
estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and country, city, municipality, district or other political subdivision,
or any other group or combination acting as a unit.tI n /
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary) ! \ ) . \ (J
Date: OCTOBER 14, 1991 ,~\, 1.
[A.l13\ADISCLOSE.TXT)
RICHARD A. RYALS, PRESIDENT RYALS & ASSOC.
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Revised: 1l/30f.)O]
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I 7
Meeting Date 10-22-91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution )t,j 79 Approving temporary street closures for
Cook Elementary School para~~~
Director of Public Work~ar-
(4/5ths Vote: Yes~NoJl)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
BACKGROUND: Staff has received a request from Cook Elementary School to
temporarily close adjacent streets on October 31, 1991 for a parade.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Counci 1 approve the temporary closure subject
to staff's conditions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A.
DISCUSSION:
Staff received a request from Cook Elementary School to temporarily close some
of the adjacent streets for one hour and a half for the purposes of conducting
a parade. The parade is schedul ed for Thursday, October 31, 1991 from 9: 30
a.m. to approximately 11:00 a.m. The parade which will have the students from
Cook Elementary in conjunction with Castle Park Middle School Marching Band.
It is requested that the parade route commence from the intersection of
Cuyamaca Avenue and E. Palomar Drive and proceed northward on East San Miguel
Dri ve to the east half of Hi 11 top Dri ve, south to East Palomar Dri ve then
eastward to the school.
The Chul a Vi sta Pol ice Department Traffi c Di vi s i on has been in contact with
the school and will be providing several officers to assist in traffic
control. It should be noted that the northbound lane of Hilltop Drive will be
closed for approximately 15 to 30 minutes. During this time, traffic will be
a 11 owed on the west half of the roadway and wi 11 be contro 11 ed by the Pol ice
Department. Chula Vista Transit service should not be affected.
Staff does not have any concerns with the parade route as long as the
elementary school works with the Police Department to ensure adequate traffic
control and that the elementary school notify all affected residents along the
parade route. Traffic impacts should be minimal since the parade route is
generally through a residential area during non-peak hours.
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A.
WPC 5782E
Attachment: Area Plat
KY-047
/7-1
o
...I
o
o
x
o
fI)
>-
a:
<
""w
z....
W~
:EO
wa:
...I
Ww
~Q
0.
Oa:
0<
Q.
0Z
Ww
Ow
~3:
...10
W..J
N..J
<<
Xx
.,
-I
,
__-r,
, \
-~ ,
-" , ~\
" ..>:"'.
/-~'>,
,
,
--
I-
<r:
..J
,Q"
\
\
\
,--
~~- -
.....--\ / \ --
<r:
w
a:
<r:
17-~
RESOLUTION NO. I/'3 71
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING TEMPORARY STREET
CLOSURES FOR COOK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARADE
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, staff has received a request from Cook
Elementary School to temporarily close some of the adjacent streets
for one and one-half hours for the purpose of conducting a parade;
and
WHEREAS, the parade is scheduled for Thursday, October
31, 1991 from 9:30 a.m. to approximately 11:00 a.m. and will have
the students from Cook Elementary in conjunction with Castle Park
Middle School Marching Band; and
WHEREAS, it is requested that the parade route commence
from the intersection of Cuyamaca Avenue and E. Palomar Drive and
proceed northward on East San Miguel Drive to the east half of
Hilltop Drive, south to East Palomar Drive then eastward to the
school; and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Police Department Traffic
Division has been in contact with the school and will be providing
several officers to assist in traffic control; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve temporary street
closures for cook Elementary School parade on October 31, 1991 from
9:30 a.m. to approximately 11:00 a.m. on the condition that: (1)
the elementary school works with the Police Department to ensure
adequate traffic control and (2) that the elementary school notify
all affected residents along the parade route.
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\RS\Cook parade
J 7'" :3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
18"
10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Report: Proposal for Norman Park Center - a multi-
purpose senior service center ,~j
Director of Parks and RecreationJ'~
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY: City Manage9 (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No-L)
The City is currently renovating Norman Park Center. The new
second story will provide an opportunity to expand the services of
the Department's current senior social service referral program.
The Commission on Aging and the Human Services Council formed a
Social Services Subcommittee, with representatives from their
membership in February 1991, to make recommendations on the use of
the second floor for the senior referral program. The
Subcommittee's recommendations are to pursue a proposal to convert
Norman Park Center into a multi-purpose senior center. A
centralization of senior referral services would allow seniors
access to a variety of pertinent services. This report describes
the proposal presented by the Commission on Aging and the Human
Services Council.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council:
1. Support the proposal for a multi-purpose Senior Service
Center at Norman Park Center, and
2. Direct staff to return with contracts between the City of
Chula vista and the South County Council on Aging, Senior
Adult Services and Pro Tech.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Commission on Aging voted
6-0 with one absent to accept the report. The Parks and Recreation
Commission voted 7-0 to accept the report.
DISCUSSION: For the past 18 months, the Social Services
Subcommittee has interviewed a variety of senior services agencies,
in order to make a recommendation to the Council for resident
agencies at the Norman Park Center. As part of the interview
process, an informal survey of interest was sent to 77 non-profit,
senior serving agencies to determine if they were interested in
providing services at Norman Park Center. Preference was to be
given to those agencies who would meet the following criteria,
among others:
1.
Commitment that Chula vista residents would have priority
to receive the offered service.
[npcsenorJ
1
jg:/
:Item
Meetinq Date
I?/'
10/22/91
2. Agency's service is unique and not duplicated by other
existing services.
3. 75% of the agency's service population are clients 50
years of age or older.
Twelve agencies responded to the survey and their space and time
requirements are varied.
In addition, the Subcommittee is developing an administrative
reporting and contracting system for evaluation of the proposed
participating agencies. The reporting document will track services
provided which will be utilized by not only the Human Services
Council and the Area Agency on Aging, but the Parks and Recreation
Department and other agencies as well.
The second story of Norman Park Center has 2,500 sq. ft. available
for non-City programming, and would accommodate three full-time or
"anchor" agencies. The anchor agencies will provide basic services
to the seniors. It is recommended that the following agencies
become the full-time service providers at Norman Park Center:
South county council on Aging - Shared Housing Program
Senior Adult Services - Meals-an-Wheels
Pro Tech - Senior Legal Service
These agencies were chosen to be recommended for space because they
expressed a desire to offer full-time services, and in the opinion
of the Subcommittee, met or exceeded the desired criteria.
The South County Council on Aging - Shared Housing has been
provided space, free of charge, by the City of Chula vista for many
years. They promote a program where two or more persons share
living arrangements and share in housing-related expenses, or
exchange services in lieu of rent, thereby serving both their
financial and social needs.
The Meals-an-Wheels program has temporarily been utilizing the
Congregational Church until decisions were made for Norman Park
Center. They help seniors stay independent by preserving the
clients' dignity and remain self sufficient in their own homes and
avoid having to move to a board and care or convalescent hospital.
Pro Tech, a Senior Legal Service, is presently housed at the MAAC
facility. They provide free legal services to elderly clients
(over 60) in San Diego county. Pro Tech receives their funding
through the federal Older Americans Act, and are the only agency in
[npcsenor]
2
18")..
1'1'
Item
Meetinq Date 10/22/91
San Diego County contracting to provide legal service under the
Act.
The remainder of the space on the second floor would be established
as work stations which would be dedicated to a variety of non-
profit agencies who can provide services on a consistent part-time
basis. This part of the social service program is designed to be
flexible and adaptable to the ever changing needs of the senior
population. The agencies which are recommended to participate at
Norman Park Center are listed in Attachment 2.
The city of Chula vista has not previously entered into a formal
contract procedure with social services agencies to provide
services for the community; although the City presently has an
agreement with the Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP) to
provide volunteer services for their outreach program. In the
city of Carlsbad, a Letter of Understanding is utilized with the
majority of their service providers; while a formal contract exists
with a meals provider organization. The city of Escondido has
formal agreements with the North County Council on Aging and the
Senior Services Council. Neither of these cities charge a fee,
rental, or fair share of costs arrangement with the providers.
FISCAL IMPACT: The three anchor agencies will pay a fair share
percentage of operating costs based on square footage occupied;
(i.e., electricity and gas) for an approximate amount of $100 per
month each. They will be completely responsible for their own
telephone services and charges. For the part-time agencies, funds
will not be collected; however, the City will enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding with the providing agency; similar to
the documentation the City exercises for the Facility Use Permit
process. There will be rules and regulations for use of the space
and an outline of each parties' obligations.
Attachments:
1.
2.
~
~~
~J
~G)
[npcsenor]
3.
4.
Minutes from commission on Aging approving the
report
Minutes from Parks and Recreation Commission
approving the report
Informal survey of interest to agencies
List of part-time agencies and responses to
survey
Report from subcommittee to the Commission on
Aging and the Human Services Council
criteria for evaluation of agencies
Memos from commission on Aging and Human
Services Council with approval of Subcommittee
report
5.
6.
7.
3
Jrr'3/19-16
Attachment 1
. Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of the
COMMISSION ON AGING
Wednesday 3:00 p.rn.
JUNE 12. 1991
PIns IRI Recreation
CoIllelellCe Room
*******************
CALL Mlili"llNG TO ORDERJROIL CALL
PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE,lSILENT PRAYER
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Gilstrap, Commissioners Stokes, Dennison, Grindle (late
3:11), Hagedorn, Scrivener
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commi~~iODer Biggers (Excused)
1. APPROVAL OF TIIE MINUTES of the meeting of May 8, 1991.
STOKESlDENNISON S-O (Grindle out)
2. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Human Services Council Report
Commi~~ioner Dennison stated that the deadline for the Human Services Council
newsletter is June 19, 1991. All items should be submitted to her for inclusion in the
newsletter.
b. Norman Park Center Renovation Report
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported that she had recently toured the
construction site. The project seems to be progressing well and has a target
completion date for the end of December.
c. Senior Services Subcommittee Report
Chair GDstrap called the commissioners attention to the memorandum in the packet
and asked for the Commission's response to the subcommittee's recommendations.
Motion to accept the subcommittee's recommendations as presented.
MSC STOKESIHAGEDORN 6-0
1~-:5
COMMISSION ON AGING MINUTES
JUNE 12, 1991
PAGE 2
Motion to direct the subcommittee to submit the proposal to the Parks and
Recreation Department.
MSC STOKES/SCRIVENER 6-0
d Centenarian Day
The Commi...~ioners commented on the Centenarian Day presentation and joy it
brought to the Jives of some of our senior citizens. It was the feeling of the
Commi"Sioners that it was certainly worthwhile to continue this program.
3. NEW BUSINESS
8. Chula Vista 21/Adult Dav Care
Tim Jones of the Chula Vista 21 Subcommittee on Child and Adult Care gave a brief
overview on the actions of that committee so far and their future plans in the area
of funding source identification.
b. Summer Schedule
Chair Gilstrap asked the ComnUssion if they would like to keep with their tradition
and go dark for the months of July and August.
Motion to go dark for the months of July and August and meet at the call of the
Chair.
MSC HAGEDORN/GRINDLE 6-0
c. Chair Selection
Commissioner Grindle stated that she felt the current Chair and Vice Chair were
doing such an outstanding job that they should serve another term of office.
Motion to elect Unda Gilstrap, Chair and Helen Stokes as Vice Chair for Fisca1 Year
91-92.
MSC SCRIVENER/HAGEDORN 6-0
4. COMMUNICATIONS
8. Oral Communications
/9".(,.
OOMMISSION ON AGING MINUTES
JUNE 12, 1991
NONE
PAGE 3
b. Written Communications
NONE
c. C'..nmmissioners Remarks
Commissioner Scrivener expressed her concern about CPI rent increase clauses in
Mobile Home Park lease agreements. After some discussion, the Commission
decided to put this issue on their September agenda.
s. STAFF REPORT
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported that three busloads of seniors attended the
Del Mar Fair on Senior atizen Day.
Supervisor Beardsley gave an overview of activities at both the Norman Park Center
and the Lauderbach Center including the election of new officers of the Oxford
Senior Qub..
The meeting was adjourned to the next regularly scheduled meeting of September 11, 1991.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
,
~ CiJtu
Carole Cramer Stohr
)8"-7
Attachment 2
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
September 19, 1991
Public Services Building
Conference Room 1
*******************
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS LATE:
Chair HaIl, Commissioners Helton, Lind, Roland, Willett
Commissioners Carpenter (6:10), Sandoval- Fernandez (6:27)
1. AFPROV AL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of August 15, 1991 were approved as distributed.
)
MSC WILLE1T!LIND 5-{) (Carpenter, Sandoval-Fernandez out)
2. PUBUC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
3. DIRECfOR'S REPORT
Director Valenzuela highlighted Department Activities that will be taking place in the Fall
session. In addition, he gave statistics on Summer programs
4. REPORTS (FOR INFORMATION ONLY)
a. Marina View Park
Landscape Architect Schmidt reviewed the design of Marina View Park for the benefit of the
two new commissioners.
b. Golf Course Marketinl! and Alcohol Ban
Deputy Director Foncerrada relayed the City Attorney's interpretation of !be Golf Course
Lease Agreement that American Golf is in compliance with the contract.
c. Richard Pena's Comments
Director Valenzuela read comments from Mr. Pena's column in the Chula Vista Star News.
/8''''~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19,1991
PAGE 2
d. HilItoD Park Citizens' Meetin2
The Chair of this Commission will attend a citizens' meeting at Hilltop Jr. High on September
25, at 7:00 pm.
e. Eucalvotus Park Tournaments
Sr. Recreation Supervisor Gates gave an overview and background of the problems associated
with league play at Eucalyptus Park, and outlined the Department's new policy to mitigate
these problems.
Commissioner Helton objected to the policy as outlined in the report.
The Director stated that the policy was a compromise between the interests of both parties,
so that tournament play will stilI be allowed, but with a lesser negative impact to the lives of
the residents surrounding the park.
Chair Hall suggested communicating with Regional Personnel from Pony Leagues, since they
set the location for the tournaments, and arrange for the tournaments to be held at another
location.
Chair Hall asked that the Commission be updated periodically on this problem.
5. ACTION fIEMS
Unfinished Business
American Legion
Director Valenzuela gave a history of events and actions by the Commission and City Council
to date. .
He reiterated that he has serious reservations about the use of City park land to house a
privately owned and operated facility. However, if Council does approve the use of land at
Eucalyptus Park to build a new facility for the American Legion, it is the Director's
recommendation that the Parks and Recreation Department have no involvement in use of
the second floor of the building for youth recreational programming.
He opposes this joint use both philosophically and from a liability standpoint. He does not
feel that credible programming can be run for children with an anti drug/alcohol focus when
liquor is being served in the bar downstairs.
Commissioner WilIett stated that while he understands the objection to having children's
activities in such close proximity to an area where alcohol is being served, he feels that the
18'--/tJ
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19, 1991
PAGE 3
American Legion has some historical rights because of their past service to both the youth
and adults of the community. He believes that the second story could be structurally isolated
from the bar area on the first floor.
Commissioner Helton asked if it would be possible to the Department to use the second floor
to house staff.
Director Valenzuela responded that the Department would not be allowed the exclusive use
of the second floor. The American Legion would be using the second floor for fund raising
activities such as party rentals and bingo, therefore precluding its use for staff offices.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that the American Legion only be allowed to
build their facility if they did not include a bar.
Other Commissioners felt that this would not be acceptable to the American Legion as their
bar was a main activity area as well as a fund raiser for the organization.
The Director concurred with this. Deputy Director Shy pointed out that there is a bar on
the second floor as well and that both alcohol service and smoking would be allowed on the
second floor during times when there were no children's activities taking place.
Commissioner Carpenter asked the Director to clarity the proposed use of the bar on the
second floor.
Director Valenzuela responded that the proposed use of the second story is joint between
the Parks and Recreation Department and the American Legion. A bar would be located
on the second floor, with the stock of alcohol being removed when the Legion is not present.
Commissioner Lind feels that in light of the fact that the Department has just had two
facilities (the library site at 4th and Orange and the Youth Center) in the western area taken
away from them, they should give stronger consideration to using a space that is being offered
to them. Even though there are disadvantages to the space, Commissioner Lind feels that
it is better than no space at all.
Chair Hall disagrees. He feels that it is important for the Department to maintain high
standards when it comes to their programming for children. If Council mandates a joint use
the Department will, of course, act accordingly. However, as a Parks and Recreation
Commission, it is important to maintain a position of high moral standard.
Commissioner Roland stated that he is adamantly opposed to the location of a facility for the
type of activities that the American Legion is proposing (drinking and smoking) being located
in a park.
1';--/1
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19, 1991
PAGE 4
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez stated that no matter what Council does, the Commission
should go on record as opposing the use of park land in this manner. She feels that the
Commission should maintain their standards and not be swayed by political pressure to
reverse their decision.
Motion that the Commission oppose removal of 1.6 acres from Eucalyptus Park use for
development by the American Legion.
MSC SANDOVALlFERNANDEZ 5-1 (Lind Abstained, Conflict of Interest)
Chair Hall stated that while he agrees with the Commission's position, this is a very political
issue with a long history and Council may decide to allow the building to be built on park
land.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez stated that while she certainly does not want to appear
anti-veteran or anti-Legion, it is her feeling that the City should be building a recreation
facility on the site and programming that facility for the youth of the area.
Commissioner Lind asked if programming other than youth programming could be run in the
proposed American Legion facility.
The Director stated possibly the Department could consider some aerobics or jazzercise
classes for adults.
Chair Hall does not feel that an aerobics class on the second floor with the resultant impact
on the floor (ceiling of the first floor bar) would be a workable situation for either party.
Motion that, if Council acts to approve the placement of the American Legion building on
park land, the Parks and Recreation Department not be involved in any programming on this
site, but aggressively pursue other sites in the northwest area of the City for the needed
programming.
MSC HELTON/ROLAND 5-0 (Lind, Willett abstained, Conflict of Interest)
New Business
a. Norman Park Providers Tenancy
Recreation Supervisor Beardsley presented the Commission on Aging Subcommittee's report
which recommends social services agencies to be housed in the second story of the new
Norman Park Center. She stated that the Commission on Aging had spent a year in
researching and becoming familiar with the various social services agencies operating in the
South Bay.
/ K"'" I :2.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19,1991
PAGE 5
Motion to accept the report as presented
MSUC SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ/CARPENTER 7-0
b. Recreational Needs Analysis for Rancho San Miguel Community Park
Wayne Loftus of Rancho San Miguel Partners discussed the reasons for and methods of
conducting the survey, and Was available to answer the Commissioners questions regarding
the report.
Motion to support the concept put forth by the developer in the report and to have the
report retained as background.
MSUC WILLEITIHALL 7-0
c. Business Cards for Commissioners
Motion to have business cards, but that each individual Commissioner will for her/his OWO.
d Special Meeting Date
Motion to add an item "Non-resident fees" to this agenda.
MSUC LIND/CARPENTER 7-0
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez asked if the proposed fee Was significantly higher than
fees of other surrounding cities.
Director Valenzuela responded that it Was not.
Commissioner Und asked if the Youth Sports Council would be considering this.
Director Valenzuela stated that youth sports would not be affected by this policy.
Motion to recommend adoption of a non-resident fee for adult sports leagues' use of fields.
MSUC WILLEITIHALL 7-0
e. Child Care in Community Centers
Commissioner George Hartman of the Child Care Commission presented that Commission's
report on preparation for child care in future City facilities.
J 8" / .5
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 19, 1991
PAGE 6
The Commission discussed at length, the Child Care Commission's report and the Parks and
Recreation role in this issue.
Motion to support the policy on child care services at City sites and achieve a 'checklist" to
be included, where appropriate, in future City facilities plans that would accommodate child
care.
MSC WILLETI/HALL 4-0; Three abstentions, Carpenter, Helton, Lind - Unclear on
meaning of motion.
6. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Correspondence
William Eckhart Letter
Staff to draft a letter to Mr. Eckhart from the Commission.
Mr. & Mrs. Michael Vesey
Marc & Diana Kryjewski
b. Commissioners' Comments
Chair Hall, Vice Chair Lind, Commissioners Roland and Willett will be unable to
attend the meeting on October 17. It was the consensus of the Commissioners to
postpone the October meeting to October 24.
Commissioner Willett feels that the Department really needs to form a Parks Society
(a non-profit organization to support the Parks and Recreation Department's
interests). He asked if staff could investigate this concept and report back to the
Commission in three months or so on the feasibility of doing this.
Adjournment to the meeting of October 24, 1991 (as postponed from October 17, 1991).
Respectfully submitted,
~~ ait!ll~~
Carole Cramer Stohr
18',,/0/
~f~
~:-:
~~~~
---
Attachment 3
CJN OF
CHUIA VISTA
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
May 15, 1991
Dear Social Service Provider:
Norman Park Center, serving seniors in Chula Vista since 1961, is
currently undergoing a building renovation. This "face-lift" is
expected to be completed in early to mid 1992. The City is
exploring the possibility of developing it into a multi-purpose
senior center that enables our senior population access to
comprehensive and coordinated relevant services. ~his centralized
delivery system of senior services, coupled with the already
excellent recreational programming, will provide optimum service to
meet the senior population's needs of the 21st century.
The Commission on Aging and the Human Services Council are
conducting this informal survey of interest via this correspondence
with your agency. If space should be made available, we'd like to
know if your agency would be interested in offering its service at
Norman Park Senior Center.
Those agencies which respond in the affirmative by June 1, 1991
will be reviewed by the Commission on Aging and the Human Services
Council. Preference will be given to those aqencies whose
programs, mission statement and services closely reflect the
following criteria elements:
* Commitment from the agency that Chula Vista
residents will have priority to receive the offered
service.
* Governmental and/or non profit agencies who provide
the service free or on a sliding scale based on
client's need.
* 75% of the agency's service population are clients
50 years of age or older.
* Agency's service is unique and not duplicated by
other existing programs.
I K'''I5"
276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 920101(619) 691-5071
* Program structure honors and helps preserve
client's dignity and provides resources for the
client to move beyond the need for assistance
and/or avoid greater dependency on other forms of
social assistance.
* Agency can demonstrate a sensitivity and
understanding for the physical, social and
emotional well-being of the elderly population.
Examples of these commitments can be demonstrated
through agency's values/mission
statement, implemented programs and services.
If you are interested in being considered for inclusion in Norman
Park's MUlti-Purpose Senior Service Center, we'd like to hear from
you by June 1, 1991. Reply in letter format with attachments
included. Please show how your agency embraces each of the above
mentioned criteria elements.
The Commission on Aging and the Human Services Council will issue
a report that includes agency recommendations to the Parks and
Recreation Department by the end of June. We would like to repeat
that this is an INFORMAL SURVEY OF INTEREST and is done for the
purpose of making RECOMMENDATIONS on services that would be
appropriate for the expansion of Norman Park Senior Center.
There will be operational costs involved with agencies providing
services at Norman Park Senior Center. Would your agency be
prepared to pay an appropriate percentage of utility and telephone
fees utilized by your organization?
Thank you for your interest, we look forward to your response.
Please send your letter/packet to:
NORMAN PARK SENIOR CENTER
311 "F" Street
Chu1a Vista, CA 91910
Sincerely,
o(~~ ~ '1f?-
Linda Gelstrap, Chair
Q~?;J::;;ion nn Aging
Pam Smith, Chair
Chula Vista Human Services Council
mc:NRMNIPRKiCNTR
)8'" It,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
[npcsenor]
Attachment 4
RECOMMENDED PART-TIME AGENCIES
FOR NORMAN PARK CENTER
San Diego County Mental Health Services - Senior Services
Team: They provide assessment, intervention and short-
term counseling for those suffering from depression,
grief, confusion, and other signs of mental disability.
Senior Peer Counseling: They provide training,
counseling and supervision of volunteer peer counselors.
At Your Home Services: In home support offers non-
medical services such as homemaker, personal care,
grocery shopping, respite care, medical claims
assistance, meal preparation, errands, and letter
writing.
Chula Vista Welfare Council: They will provide
assessment for emergency assistance.
Scripps Memorial Hospital is offering to provide Health
Education programs, physician and Medicare lectures.
Senior Adult Services, Inc. is willing to assist seniors
with daily money management problems and care management.
Alzheimer's Association - will provide a monthly support
group for families of Alzheimer patients.
Social Security Administration - will provide outreach
services on a quarterly basis.
Area Agency on Aging - Ombudsman Services: Ombudsman
volunteers serve as independent, objective, mediators
serving patients, residents and administrators in
resolving problems in Long Term Care Facilities.
/~>I?
Attachment 4A
....., . ~.
I") C.
~, ~ :
~ ,I
SCCOA
SERVING
SENIORS
South
Cou nty
Council
On Aging
May 28, 1991
Norman Park Senior Center
311 F Street - Suite A
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: Letter May 15, 1991-Parks & Rec. Dept.
Linda Gelstrap
Pam Smith
We appreciate the opportunity to respond to your referenced
letter. If space is available, we are interested in offering
our services in the new Norman Park Center Building.
Included is our mission statement and a resume of Shared
Housing program services and objectives.
I feel certain we could pay a share of utilities, although
at this time we do not know the amount of our 1991/1992
funding and have not included this expense item in our budget.
We own our telephones and presently pay our monthly services
and any expense of moving or repairs.
Thank you for your consideration of our program services.
Sincerely,
SOUTH COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
~M . .Wh~tt. t
aX1ne 1 1ng on
Director - Shared Housing
mw
Encl.
Ii''' I'
Post Office Box 146 . Chula Vista, California 92012 . (619) 422-6876
SOUTH COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
SHARED HOUSING
I. MISSION STATEMEm
The mission of South County Council on Aging (SeeDA) is to
promote a Shared Housing Program where two or more persons
share living arrangements and share in housing related
expenses, or exchange services in lieu of rent, thereby
serving both their financial and social needs.
II. PROGRAM SERVICES AND OBJEX)TIVES
seCDA 's Shared Housing Program began in 1982 with funding from the
city of Chula Vista and County of San Diego. Chula Vista residents
compose the largest percentage of our clients. In 1990 of the 162
persons placed in homesharing arrangements, 62% were Chula Vista
residents.
Shared Housing is a non-profit organization providing a free service
to seniors, including handicapped and frail elderly, and low and
moderate income persons. We serve all ethnic groups.
The majority of clients are 50. years of age. In 1990 the percentage
of clients age 50 and over were 76%.
SCCOA's Shared Housing program is the only shared housing office in
the South Bay- area, serving Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, San Ysidro,
South San Diego, Bonita, Paradise Hills and National City.
The Shared Housing program often assists handicapped or frail elderly
by providing a sharer who can provide home services in lieu of rent.
This allows the owner to remain in their own home rather than become
institutionalized.
Shared Housing provide outreach activities to notify persons of the
program. A monthly newsletter is mailed to many residents of the
area with information about social, recreational and health programs
offered in the South ~ Area. Shared Housing network with other
providers to find housing alternatives through other agencies. They
assist clients with referrals such as Social Security, legal assis-
tance, social services, and board and care. Shared Housing often
assist those on a subsidized housing waiting list until such housing
is available.
/ $'.- ,2 ()
~- -; EN lOR
ADULT
ERVICES,INC
Hf'lpin::: Senior" "Ia\ Indt->Iwncienl
2860 North Park Way
San Diego, CA 92104
(619) 297-3260
Board of Trustees
President
Mr. John Musial
Vice Presidents
Mr. Warren Johnson
Miss Priscilla Simms
Mr. Albert Gabbs
Mr. Alan BonlOe
Treasurer
Ms. Daralyne M. BaddouT
Secretary
Mrs. Robert Kronemyer
Mrs. Clayton Brace
Mr. Larry Cox
Mr. Fred Crawford
Mr. Robert Crooks
Mr. Larry Cushman
Mr. E. Doug1as Dawson
Mrs. Michael Jbs Gonzalez
Mr. James Goodwin
Mr. Gary A. GramJing
Mr. William Kolender
Mr. Richard Ledford
Mrs. Evangeline Losoya
Mrs. Shirley Meier
Mr. Joel Meriwether
Mr. Nonnan Merrick
Ms. Karen Nydam
Mrs. John O'Donnell
Ms. Margaret Peschel
Ms. Raehe] Reed
Mrs. Sue Reid
Mr. George A. Scott
Mrs. Quentin Stokes
Mrs. Dorothy Sumner
Mrs. Ross Tharp
Stoff,
EXKutive Director
Mrs. Barbara P. Bright
Director of Development
Mr. William Wiener
Attachment 4 B
1--\ I~' .... ~
( /.- ('1\
June 4, 1991
Norman Park Senior Center
311 F Street
Chula Vista, Ca 91910
Attention:
Linda Gelstrap, Chair
Chula Vista Commission On Aging
Pam Smith, Chair
Chula Vista Human Services Council
Dear Chairpersons:
Senior Adult Services/Meals On Wheels request
your consideration of this application to be
included in the Norman Park Center that is
being renovated and ready for occupancy about
mid 1992.
The following criteria documents the elements
that you are seeking in the future occupants
of the facility:
* 88% of our clients receiving Meals On
Wheels reside in Chu1a Vista (see at-
tached report to David Harris, City of
Chula vista).
* the fee charged for Meals On Wheels is
below the actual cost and that fee is
reduced according to each client's income
and expenses. Because of the wide range
of medical expenses for the elderly, we
do not have a set fee for a specific
income.
* the attached report to Mr. Harris docu-
ments that only 17 of the 134 clients
were under 62 years of age, only 3 of
those were under 50 years of age.
I~"~I
* the agency's services are unique and not
duplicated by other local programs as
this is the only home delivered, non-
profit program offering diabetic, low
sodium, low chI ore sterol , low fat and
bland diets.
* the program honors and helps preserve the
clients' dignity by helping them to re-
main self sufficient in their own homes
and avoid having to move to a board and
care or convalescent hospital.
· The mission statement of Senior Adult
Services/Meals On Wheels is "Helping
Seniors Stay Independent" - the profes-
sional staff and volunteers are committed
to recognizing and helping senior in
addressing the physical, social, emotion-
al and financial challenges of the later
years of life. The enclosed materials
document the range of services offered by
our agency.
It would be a significant asset to seniors,
volunteers and the MOW staff to have the'
office of the South Bay Meals On Wheels pro-
gram in the Norman Park Center. We would be
prepared to pay an appropriate percentage of
utility and telephone fees.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration
of our request for office space in the newly
renovated Norman Park Senior Center.
Sincerely,
~~~~
Barbara Bright, LCSW
Executive Director
/~~~
Attachment 4c
Pro * Tech
--------------
.. .'\ \/'''/''/1
__ _ \__~:?' ( , '0.,--'1 ~ 7 J<f- '
I'H<H,HI......I\'1S()<I.\1 "IH\I( 1'......\...1\\1" 11< II"\I)[(H"
"'-'(~()(-O:"l:,,(),. STREI'T - <O;l'IlT "tH,. -.;.-\.....I)(H.O. (-\ <)2111. (hl<)1 <;(,';-1';'>2
May 22, 1991
Norman Park Senior Center
311 "F" street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Our agency is interested in being considered for inclusion
in Norman Park's Multi-Purpose Senior service Center.
We are a non-profit 501 (C) (3) Charitable California
Corporation which provides free legal services to elderly clients
(over 60) in San Diego County at four different offices,
including one in Chula vista. The Chula Vista office does now
and will continue in the future to provide such legal services
only to Chula vista residents. All our services are limited to
persons over 60.
We are funded in part by funds distributed by the Area
Agency on Aging. We are the only agency in San Diego County
contracting to provide legal service under the Older Americans
Act.
We have been providing legal services to the elderly under
The Older Americans Act since 1978. Our attorneys represent
between 6,000 and 7,000 elderly annually in all types of legal
cases.
Our organization would be able to pay some costs, but our
budget is very limited. We would have to reserve the right to
review our position when the costs are known.
Thank you for your kind consideration.
Your~ Very T~y,
it~ i (Ji .'- ,
I) ~ll' \ -1, ~
BILLY H. ~ K
Director
,
.l.-~ -
) 8'; ~J
Attachment "4D
)
',,:,r-\~{~
. .
L}('
\ I ;:
.;
JOYCE BEARDSLEY
NORMANPARK CENTER
311 "F" STREET
CHULA VISTA CA. 91910
Dear Joyce,
Thank you for asking.~~ We are very interested in sharing your space and being
more of a part of your community program. This will provide better service to
the seniors, which is one of the main goals of the Senior Team, making the
services more available, and the on-site office could assist your staff, meet
the needs of your participances and their families on mental health issues.
As you know, this is budget time and everything is at a stand still, and our
agency can not make a commitment of contribution towards expenses as yet,
maybe in the future. Again we thank you for asking us, and hope we can continue
working together for the betterment of the seniors and community.
Vivian Mayes Senior Team Nurse/consulant
Ir"'~r
Attachment 4E
,
'\
lI'./11
f I I
.J WILLIAM COX M D Ph 0
([[nunt\!
~icgn
D!Rf CTOR
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES
MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
CASE MANAGEMENT SERvtCES
',0. Box 8552'
S.., Diego, CA 92186'552'
(619) 692,Il71)O (La:. Code 736)
FAX , 692'877'9
STEVEN A ESCOBOZA
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
May 31, 1991
Ms. Joyce Beardsley
Norman Park Senior Center
311 F Street
Chu1a Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Beardsley,
Thank you for your encouragement during our telephone conversation
yesterday. The Senior Peer
interested in being considered
Multi-purpose Senior Center.
Counseling Program is definitely
for inclusion in the Norman Park
To better explain our program and its unique value at your Senior
Center, I have enclosed two flyers, one explaining the San Diego
County Mental Health Senior Peer Counseling Program, and the other
describing the Santa Monica model which we are utilizing in the
training, supervision, and the offering of free counseling services
~o seniors.
Presently we are conducting a pilot Senior Peer Counseling Program
in the Chula Vista/Coronado area, with one of the Peer Counselors
housed at your center. We envision expanding the counseling
service to more seniors by offering more training, thereby having
Chula vista Senior Peer Counselors to provide increased counseling
sessions to serve more Chula Vista seniors.
The space our program can use is: (1) a medium size room to
accommodate up to 20 persons for training and group supervision for
3 hours one day each week, and (2) 2 or 3 small confidential
counseling offices/rooms available during the week for a few hours.
However, these are neqotiable.
If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me
at 692-8702.
Sincerely,
~ TJYth 5'~
BOB TORRES-STANOVIK, LCSW
Peer Counseling Program
-7 1!7 alw
~.~.
BTS:eb
Enclosures
1lr".)5
. \;- .
~~~ 1fI~
\..l/r .
=1::1=
"~9.
r
Attachment 4.F
A T YOUR HOME
SERVICES
I
I'."
{'
:\
~.( -: i
I,' " (
'-.
NON- PROFIT ORGANlZA nON
SINCE 1984
San Diego: 4350 Executiue Driu€
Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92121
(619) 558-0180
North County: 6992 EJ Camino Real
Suite 104.190
car/sbad, CA 92009
(619) 756-4382
May 30, 1991
Ms. Linda Gelstrap, Chair
Chula vista commission on Aging
c/o Norman Park Senior Center
311 "F" street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Ms. Pam Smith, Chair
Chula vista Human Services Council
c/o Norman Park Senior Center
311 "F" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Misses Gelstrap and Smith:
RE: Affirmative Interest in Providing Services at Norman Park
Senior Center.
Thank you for the opportunity to offer services at Norman Park
Senior Center. If selected, Chula vista residents would be
assured of being priority recipients of any program developed for
their community.
OVERVIEW
At Your Home Services is a non-profit organization, which I
founded in 1984. The purpose of At Your Home Services
(hereinafter "AYHS") is to help prevent institutionalization of
seniors, disabled, and infirm, with non-medical, in-home
supportive services. Such services include the following:
homemaker, personal care, shopping, meal preparation, escort-
type transportation, respite care, money management, and
telephone reassurance. Approximately 90% of AYHS's clients are
50 years of age or older.
18''';;' ?
Misses Gelstrap and smith
May 30, 1991
Page 2
PHILOSOPHY
At Your Home Services is community-based. AYHS believes that a
client who is able to maintain independence in the security,
comfort, and safety of his home experiences significant
enrichment in the quality of his life. AYHS believes in
respecting the client, no matter what his physical condition,
mental condition, age, sex, ethnicity, or religious beliefs--our
belief is to accept him, as he is, with fUll-regard for his well-
being. When we walk into the home of a client, we believe he is
the master of his own home, and our role is to accommodate his
preferences through the services we provide.
Institutionalization is costly in financial, as well as human
terms. AYHS offers an alternative to institutionalization
through its understanding of our community's needs, creation of
innovative programs, and years of experience as a provider of
quality, home-based services.
WORKER PROFILE
At Your Home Services currently employs over 130 in-home service
providers who work on a per diem basis. service providers must
be caring and trustworthy individuals. In addition to the
interview process, all service providers must possess a non-
medical caregiver training certificate. Backgrounds ~re
thoroughly checked. AYHS is extremely responsible, realizing the
true vulnerability of the populations it services.
FUNDING SOURCES
The following is a list of our funding sources:
l. Title III-B: County of San Diego
2. MSCP: County of San Diego
3. Linkages: County of San Diego
4. MASH: County of San Diego
5. Continuing Care: Kaiser Hospital
6. Southern Caregiver Resource Center
7. San Diego Regional Center for the Developmentally Disabled
It is important to emphasize that we have been serving South Bay
residents for five years, and enjoy our work in your community.
Also, a member of our Board is a South Bay resident.
I ~.. ,2 '!"
Misses Gelstrap and Smith
May 30, 1991
Page 3
GOAL
It is a goal for AYHS to establish a share-of-cost program for
seniors with special financial needs. If selected, AYHS will
utilize some of its potential grant sources and develop a share-
of-cost (sliding scale) program.
It is our belief that no other agency offers quality of service
AYHS provides, in the area of non-medical in-home supportive
services. Additionally, and to my best knowledge, we are the
only non-profit agency serving infants through elders (persons
must be senior, disabled, or infirm to be eligible for care) -_
AYHS is about the preservation of the family unit via in-home
assistance.
COMMUNITY AFFILIATIONS
The following is AYHS's community-based network:
1. San Diego Interagency Council--
Legislative and Bylaws Committees.
2. California Association for Health Services At Home--Membership
Committee.
3. American Cancer Society--patient and Family services
Committee.
4. Health Access of San Diego: Administrative vice President.
5. San Diego Council on Aging.
6. East County Provider's Council.
7. South Bay Provider's Council.
8. I & R Network.
9. North County Provider's Council for the Developmentally
Disabled.
lO.Integrated Family Life.
11.Chambers of Commerce: Rancho Bernardo, and Golden Triangle.
1 <6"":l'
Misses Gelstrap and smith
May 30, 1991
Page 4
CONCLUSION
At Your Home Services welcomes the opportunity to strengthen its
existing ties with your community. Attached is a list of our
regular, private pay services and fees, my resume, and a list of
our Board of Directors. Also, brochures and business cards have
been enclosed.
Thank you for the opportunity to share our program with you. I
look forward to hearing from you soon.
Sincerely,
c(:i~~e~~
Founder and Executive Director
Enclosures
I '8''' ;$0
cr.../a 'Vr"ta 'U.Mf",c C..-.;
Attachment 4G
. (
(' ..<../
\\:,r~'>' \"1
> -.! "";, -\,
'f
July 2, 1991
Pam Smith, Chair
Human Services Committee
Linda Gilstr..p.
Committee of Aging
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Dear friends,
As a soci..l service agency providing Emergency ..ssistance to
residen~s of Ghul~ Vis~a for many years, we would like to apply
for 'Desk &pace in the new Norman Park Center now under construction.
We are p..rti..lly funded by Uniced Way and have the cooperation of
Ghula Vista schools witu food drives_
Thank you for your consideration in granting this request whil~
in the planning st~es.
Sincerely,
CHULA VIST1\. VIELFARE COUNCIL
. This agency is supported
in part by United Way
of San Diego County.
WE URGE YOUR SUPPORT
OfTH!
~~ UHITED WAY UMPAIGH
.~,
Mrs. W. Hedenkc:U1lp, Secr.-Treas.
515 Second Ave.
Chula Vist.., Ca. 91910
422-2978
I "t'.r3/
Attachment 4H
~~
Scripps Memorial Hospital /
~
9888 Genesee Avenue
Post Office Box 28
La Jolla, California 92038-0028
June 7, 1991
(619) 457-4123 . . (
~Q.Lo-eJ/
1o(ll/11
Linda Gelstrap, Chair
CHULA VISTA COMMISSION ON AGING
Pam Smith, Chair
CHULA VISTA HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
Norman Park Senior Center
311 F Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Gelstrap and Ms. Smith:
Thank you for the invitation to participate in the new Norman Park Center. Your plans
sound very exciting and the programs to be offered to the older adults in our community
are certainly needed.
Scripps Memorial Hospitals, as a provider of a multitude of diverse senior services would be
pleased to become part of any programs you may offer. We are available to participate in
an advisory capacity or any area in which you need our expertise. Our services vary, and
certainly, working together will make each of our goals and objectives easier to achieve.
Currently we have two locations where our programs are offered, HealthPlus55 at 3rd Avenue,
and at the Well Being Health Information Center in the Chula Vista Shopping Center.
Although we appreciate the invitation to provide our services at your location, our present
centers are sufficient at this time.
We are available to do physician lectures, or Medicare seminars at your new center. Please
let us know your needs. As a community hospital we are available to help amI I look forward
to our future affiliation and working with you.
,/
Barbara Ekberg
Director
Corporate Membership Programs
(619) 457-7080
BE:dm
c: Jeannette Hadaway
/8''' 3~
SENIOR /
ADULT
ERVICES,INC.
Attachment 41
Helping Seniors Stay Independent
Linda Gilstrap June 21, 1991
Pam Smith
CO-Chairs
Human Services Committee
311 "F" Street,
.Chula Vista, Ca, 91910
2860 North Park Way
San Diego, CA 92104
(619) 297-3260
Board of Trustees
Dear Ms. Gilstrap and Smith;
President
Mr. John Musial
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration
of our request for office space for our Meals
On Wheels program in the new senior center.
Vice Presidents
Mr. Wanen Johnson
Miss Priscilla Simms
Mr. Albert Gabbs
Mr. Alan Bonine
This letter will confirm the verbal request
by Dorothea Grindle for part time space for
housing the care/money management servjces
offered by Senior Adult Services. We ask for
private office space, with telephone, desk
and chairs for one half day a week. We would
provide one to one counseling services to
assist seniors with daily money management
problems and care management that would in-
clude crisis intervention assessment, emo-
tional support and referral as needed.
Treasurer
Ms. Daralyne M. Baddour
Secretary
Mrs. Robert Kronemyer
Mrs. Gayton Brace
Mr. Lany Cox
Mr. Fred Crawford
Mr. Robert Crooks
Mr. Larry Cushman
Mr. E. Douglas Dawson
Mrs. Michael Ibs Gonzalez
Mr. James Goodwin
Mr. Ga'}' A. Gramling
Mr. Wuliam Kolender
Mr. Richard Ledford
Mrs. Evangeline Losoya
Mrs. Shirley Meier
Mr. Joel Meriwether
Mr. Norman Merrick
Ms. Karen Nydam
Mrs. John O'Donnell
Ms. Margaret Peschel
Ms. Rachel Reed
Mrs. Sue Reid
Mr. George A. Scott
Mrs. Quentin Stokes
Mrs. Dorothy Sumner
Mrs. Ross Tharp
We do not want to inappropriately duplicate
existing services in the area. If other
agencies are providing the care management
services, we would limit our services to the
daily money management as described in the
attached brochure.
We are willing to pay the pro-rated share of
the telephone and utilities costs for the use
of the office space and telephone.
Thank you for your consideration of this
request.
Sincerely,
Suff:
. ~~~ &~~
;?;:;~~: P. Bright, LCSW
Executive Director
Executive Director
Mrs. Barbara P. Bright
Director.of DeveIopment
Mr. WLlliam Wiener
I'i'''' ;r;:;
Attachment 4.J
Executive Director
Ronald C. Hendrix, Ph.D.
Founder
Anna Tucker
Board of Directors
Prf1tJJdenl
Wilham Y. Smith
Rr.' VIce-President
Gayle F. Anderson, Esq
5<<:ond Vke-Pre./denf
Gwen Wilber
Secreltlry
UI Jackson
r,...urer
Leslie S. Klein
Edward Beberman, Esq.
luann Beberman, Esq
W. Major Chance
Mark R. Clifton
Sharon Everett
Roland E. Gifford
J. Edward Jackson, M.D.
Arthur a. Johnson
Betty Murphy
Peter Hans Orth
Thomas Patterson, Ph.D.
Ann Schnall
Tom Schultz
Wanda Smith
Hal Tural!
Ramon Valle, Ph.D.
Medical Advisory Board
ChIIlrpenon
J. Edward Jackson M.D.
Kwi Bulow, MD.
Judy Canterbury, R.N., G.N.P.
Helena Cook-Gait. M.A.
Susan Gilpatrick. R.N.
George Glennar, M.D.
Richard Jiminez, M.D.
Bruce Lasker. M.D.
Dorothy ~ses, R.N., M.S.
Thomas Patterson, Ph.D.
Joe Ramsdell, M.D.
Enid Rockwell, M.D.
Bruce Sachs, M.D.
Beverly Sanborn, L.C.SW.
Ray Schwartz, L.C.SW.
Leon Thai, M.D.
Honorary Directors
U.S. Congmll
Hon. Bill Lowery
c.lllorn'- Governor
Hon. Pete Wilson
Cel/Iorni. Senate
Hon. Lucy Killea
Celifom/. A..embly
Hon. Carol Bentley
ASSOCIATION
Someone to Stand By You.
June 20, 1991
Linda Gelstrap, Chair, Chula Vista Commission on Aging
Pam Smith, Chair, Chula Vista Human Services Council
Norman Park Senior Center
311 "F" Street
Chula Vista, California 91910
Dear Mesdames Gelstrap and Smith:
I am writing in response to a letter that was forwarded to me regarding utilization
of the Norman Park Center. I am pleased to see that the City of Chula Vista is
reaching out to assist agencies that are providing services to Chula Vista Seniors.
The Alzheimer's Association of San Diego presently operates an adult day care
program called the "Morning Out Club" in the First Methodist Church on the
corner of 3rd and "J" streets. The Association also conducts monthly support
groups in the facility for caregivers and their family members.
Presently, we have 18 support groups throughout the county. It is our hope to
continue to expand this network as individuals are identified who could benefit
from the service. Ultimately, we would like to establish additional support
groups in Chula Vista.
We are working toward one of these groups being for Spanish speaking
individuals. It is our hope that if we do start additional groups that we might be
able to use the Norman Park Center, either in English or Spanish. There would
be no fee for membership in our support group.
Thank you for your interest in those of us trying to improve the quality of the
lives of our families. Also, thank you for your consideration of this request.
Sin~/~
Ronald C. Hendrix, Ph.D.
Executive Director
RCH:jec
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 23877, San Diego, CA 92193 . Street Address: 3702 Ruffin Road, San Diego, CA 92123
San Diego (619) 541-1776 . · FAX (619) 541-1833
North County (Toll Free) 7~1265
/g-":J7
Attachment 5
MEMO
DATE:
TO:
June 6, 1991
The Human Services Council
The Commission on Aging
FROM:
Social Services Sub-Committee
RE:
Recommendations on Social Services
for Norman Park Senior Center
As you are aware, this subcommittee has been very busy evaluating a variety
of appropriate senior social services for their potential selection as
occupants for the second floor of Norman Park Senior Center. We have con-
cluded our evaluation process and are happy to share our recommendations
with the Human Services Council and the Commission on Aging.
Evaluation Procedure:
An informal survey of interest was sent out on May 15, 1991, to over 77 non-
profit, senior-serving agencies to determine if they were interested in pro-
viding services through Norman Park Senior Center. The following agencies
responded to our survey:
1. South County Council on Aging/Shared Housing
2. Senior Adult Services/Meals on Wheels
3. "Pro-tec"/~enior Legal Services
~o.!;'
4. "At yourl\~ervice"/In Home Support
5. County Mental Health/Senior Services Team
6. County Mental Health/Senior Peer Counseling
7. Area Agency on Aging
8. Alzheimer's Association/Alzheimer's Support Group
We developed a list of criteria that applicants needed to address and asked
them to provide support documentation. A scoring system was developed and
each applicant was evaluated against the established criteria. We are happy
to report that all applicants have met our requirements and are eligible to
be selected as occupants at Norman Park Senior Center.
Recommendations:
The second floor at N.P.S.C. can accomodate only three full-time Social Ser-
vice agencies. These "anchor" services are very important as they must re-
present basic services that provide stability to Senior's lives. We recom-
mend the following agencies to represent the "anchor" services at Norman Park
Senior Center:
1. Shared Housing
2. Meals on Wheels
3. Senior Legal Services
The remainder of the space on the second floor is dedicated to a variety of
non-profit agencies who can provide senior oriented services on a consistent
part-time basis. This area of services is designed to be flexible and a-
daptable to the ever-changing needs of the senior population. We recommend
the following agencies to represent the beginning offering of senior services
on a part-time basis:
/~-J5.
-2-
iJ\![,
1. "At Your~SerVice" - In Home Support service
2. South County Senior Services Team - mental health
3. Area Agency on Aging - Case management
Ombudsman program
4. Senior Peer Counseling
Response:
We are requesting from both the Human Services Council and the Commission
on Aging a review of these recommendations. Please provide written comments
which include instructions to the sub-committee on your wishes regarding
this proposal. The final report will be forwarded to the Chula Vista Parks
and Recreation Department and the City Council. Included in this packet,
for your review and background information, are the following attachments:
1. Copy of informal survey sent to non-profit agencies.
2. Cover letter from the non-profit agencies who responded to survey.
3. Subcommittee evaluation of applicant agencies (criteria for selection)
We would appreciate your written response by June 14, 1991.
Thank You:
Please send to: Norman Park Senior Center
311 "F" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
J ~ 3(,
<D
W
,;
OJ
15
""
u
oj
w
w
...
'I (j"1 .
. "I . /J" 1',
. s,,~ ~ls "~'P
s o.I~ ,~
"J~I "~J / ~,,:"I}/-f'''o
~B.J Vt' '-IJS J J.II
" S~ ,,~.
>JIlt. I}I~ -.q~,I)
, '" S ~ ~
"h. ~I "'I"
. .is-SlI. ,J1I~g,
,~"o;;- . b'
. q ~~otq~
~"''''u.r OI'.DJ.., 0:; ~
s:;,J.~..{(j 0",(/ $'01',) ~
~1'0"11 $> II $> 1'/l}os~
~q ~So~h"/,,IJ.'/
IllA( 0" 'IJI"
B;)lJ. ltt)",o'lAj
tJ",;; 16
...~"
11
'I (j"I" '
. 111';/J Sl..~ llJ~"t5.
s~1 '0" ,,~ 0"1/
~q . J,,~ 0,1) ~,,~
II (j~ " J
/A( 0" >JI~
i1.:J"iJ lid,,""
"'tJ.la.IB
"11
'"
;z
>--
u
w
-'
w
V>
""
o
u..
<(
""
w
>--
""
u
"0
0$
-:$" ~,,~ '
0" 'IJI s,,, ~~o
"~~iiA( "l ~llJ q~
f),J" 4",JlI..lo
tJ"'iJ tJ/j/:t
" ".:JC)"
~ d
II/A( itt~..~.. .
P;;$':iJ;;lI'../Ii~
q Ip ~
~.D (I BIll .l;)tJ J ~~..
.1""0 "'0 fJ:JS lJ. cis I.t. 9
"11 ~" "l 0
"/"O~Jl'l;: "J!;lIS
d...", sa;. o/iJ$
04 $> ~"~(j/T
~0.9
'-f'
p s""~"Ol,,
IIp ~I}'I.) ~ls~} "~p"
0" .p" p, >
.. " >" ",'sl
lJiJ/q :>I.IiJ'4
"/~(j/T
0.)
E
OJ -.... ""0
...., co
V> OJo
-tD
V)
Q) ~-o s... s-
u ~ 0''- 0
C XaJOtOO
W>~u....a..
'-
o
u
t/') Ln<TM"'~
..
""
"I
(")
I
I
I
I
,
I
(")!
J
I
I
I
I
"'I
I
(")
'"
I
"'I
0>
C
'~
V>
::J
o
:x:
-0
OJ
'-
'"
..c:
V")
>--
u..
<D
"I
",,'
"'I
'"
"'!
I
I
""
,
I
,
NI
I
1
I
i
I
""
I
I
(")
""
""
'"
'"
'"
(")
VI
-
OJ
OJ
..c:
:3:
I
C
o
I
V>
~I
2> .~ I
'~ Q)
c V")
OJ
V") _
'"
0>
OJ
-'
-
'"
OJ
::EO
I- I-
u.. u..
1~'3?
-". -- ..----------
m____J__
____1
-"
Q)
Q)
3:
'-
OJ
0-
Q)
E
...,
Q)
c:
co
o
....... -I
...,
ro Q)
O-u
::J'~
U >
U '-
o Q)
V>
OJ
E...c--,
.~ u
I-ro
Q)
-'-
...-..O-J ..;.
::J ::J
l.L.O-:
II II
-
I- X
L.I.... ,- (',
~
~~f?
~
.......~""":;o...~
-:;...- -~
Attachment 7
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
DATE: July 3, 1991
TO: No~an :ark Social Services Sub-Committee
FROM: ~~B. smith
Chair, Chula vista Human Services Council
SUBJECT: Recommendations on Social Services for Norman Park Center
Two of the biggest problems which we have identified in providing
social services are linking the individual with the right services
and then providing easy access to that service. Access and
transportation are especially problematic for seniors.
Establishing social service providers at the Norman Park Center is
a major step toward solving these problems and improving the
quality of life for seniors in Chula Vista.
For these reasons, the Human Services Council whole heartedly
supports the recommendations of the sub-committee concerning social
services for Norman Park Senior Center. We feel that having the
three important "anchor" services as well as a variety of part
time providers will offer a wide variety of important services to
the seniors. We also applaud the survey of interest which was done
to the providers; it went a long way in getting the word out to the
community about the multi-purpose facility.
We certainly see the list of part time providers as ever changing.
Work stations should be established and designed to be as versatile
as possible so each provider can easily move in, do business, and
move out for the next provider. Perhaps the part time providers
can meet and establish a list of what would be necessary at each
work station. We also think it is important to establish good on-
going communication among these providers. The Human Services
Council would like to take an active, on-going role with our forums
and newsletters to make providers aware of the multi-purpose
facility and identify other social service providers who can do
business at the center on a part time basis.
We ask that you go forward with the sub-committee's recommendations
to the Director of Parks and Recreation. We appreciate the
opportunity to be a part of this very exciting and forward thinking
project.
18"-;] 7
360 THIRD AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 919101(619} 691-5087
Attachment 8
MEMO
DATE:
June 14, 1991
TO:
FROM:
Social Services Sub-Committee
The Commission on Aging ~
Response Regarding Proposed NPC Changes
RE:
The Commission on Aging met on June 12, 1991 and reviewed the
proposed recommendations for social services at Norman Park Senior
Center.
Please be advised that the Commission on Aging is in agreement with
the recommendations for the "anchor" agencies presented in the
memo dated June 6, 1991. We further wish to direct this sub-
committee to submit a formal proposal to the Parks and Recreation
Department, as well as to the City Council, outlining the
recommendations for Norman Park Senior Center's renovation into a
multi-purpose senior service center and identifying what social
services will be provided.
The Commission on Aging appreciates the hard work this sub-
committee has done on this subject.
/~'3r
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /9
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE:
Report on granting Development Impact Fee (DIF) credit for right-of-way
dedication, Kelton Project, Southeast corner of Otay Lakes Road and East
H Street
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works
IJfV
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~
(4/Sths Vote: Yes _ No .10
RECOMMENDATION: Table this item.
DISCUSSION
This item was continued from the meeting of ~Ptember 24, 1991 at the request of the
developer. The developer has requested additional time to discuss the item with staff. It is
therefore recommended that the item be tabled. Staff will bring the item back on a future
agenda when discussions between the developer and staff have concluded.
JPL:SB/ A-I13S/KELTON2
101791
J9-j
E' T_~ ~:':
c: T -'f
=tj~~. T;:L ~~c .1213:(~I'~jOCj~,2
Oct ~~,91 12:43 No.002 P.OI
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
Octob~r 22, 1991
21 tt5 O<;EAN F>....I'\~ eI.VD. SvlTE 3000:;
SANTA MONICA. CAI.IFQRNIA 9Q40~.~207
PMON~ (21 J) 3:96-451'-
F ","X I:;: 1 3] J$'. OO~l
city Clerk
CITY <jF CHULA VISTA
276 FQurth Avenue
chula Vista, CA 91910
Q52 -0
.....-. .....
-<-< ::rJ
.::"?c.') ~ 1'11
r"'~n (i
i~;:~:? N IT!
":.:11: ,"" W
.. " ,:::':': <
::.. v !T1
1'-,) \::1
1i,~"~-,.; iJI
m:t> \0
VIA FACSIMILE
RE: consent Item NO. 19 - DIP Fee CrcdlL fUL Yelton property
SEC "H" & otay Ioakes Road
Dear Lorna:
In this morning's telcpnone conversation yc~ indicated thA~
staff is requesting that this item be continued or tabled to
allow time for additional discussions to occur between staff and
ourselves. We concur with this and hereby respc~tfu]]y ask that
our mutual deSlre for this extension be granted by council.
Sincerely yours,
KELTON TITLE CORPORATION
~
,
,
, ( /J
By: . ?!!U~-I _.
Ma k 8lton ~
\'ice Pres ,id~?nt
MK\ak
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J..O
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 10/22/91
Ordinance ~~~.z Amending Ordinance #1966 relating to
through truck routes AM~
Director of Public work~if'
City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
There have been several changes to the City's ci rcul at i on system since the
existing truck routes were established in 1975 and amended in 1982. Review of
existing truck routes by staff show a revision of the present routes is
necessary to complement the changes and expansion of the City of Chula Vista.
Revisions to Chula Vista Municipal Code sections 10.64.010 and 10.64.040 are
also needed.
RECOMMENDATION: Place this ordinance on first reading adopting additional
truck routes within the City 1 imits and amend the Chula Vista Municipal Code
Sections 10.64.010 and 10.64.040.
DISCUSSION:
The Cal ifornia Vehicle Code does allow any city to prohibit the use of a
street by any commercial vehicle or any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross
weight 1 imit, except with respect to vehicles used for the collection and
transportation of garbage, rubbish or refuse. However, the truck route
provisions cannot prohibit commercial vehicles from using a restricted street
when necessary for the purpose of servi ng buil di ngs or structures located on
the restricted street.
Truck routes are used to designate which streets commercial vehicles can use
when transporting goods within the City. The movement of all goods on
vehicles exceeding 10,000 pounds shall be confined to designated truck routes.
The Circulation Element and Chula Vista Street Network have changed since the
existing truck routes were last amended on January 12, 1982. These changes
i nc 1 ude the add it i on of more ramps to and from 1- 5 freeway, 1-805 freeway,
SR-54, the annexation of Montgomery area from the County of San Diego and the
construction of various streets and avenues throughout the City. The purpose
of this report is to make additions to the existing truck route system in view
of the changes in the street network. Chapter 10.64 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code pertains to truck routes within the City limits.
Changes to the Muni c i pal Code are also needed to cl arify sect ions 10.64.010
and 10.64.040. Revisions to section 10.64.010 will be to establish truck
routes by ordinance as required by the Vehicle Code instead of by resolution.
The revision to 10.64.040 will be to delete the reference to resolution while
retaining the reference to establishing by ordinance. There is also a
di screpancy with the gross wei ght. Section 10.64.040 wi 11 be changed from
6,000 to 10,000 pounds (see attached).
;2 ~- /
The following are existing truck routes.
NAME OF STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
BONITA ROAD
BROADWAY
"E" STREET
FOURTH AVENUE
"HI! STREET
INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
IIJ' STREET
"L" STREET
OTAY LAKES ROAD
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
THIRD AVENUE
The revised schedule is:
1D.64.D4D
NAME OF STREET
N-S
BAY BOULEVARD
BEYER WAY
BROADWAY
EAST LAKE PARKWAY
FOURTH AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
- MARINA PARKWAY
MAXWELL ROAD
OTAY LAKES ROAD
THIRD AVENUE
WOE
ANITA STREET
BON IT A ROAD
C STREET
E STREET
F STREET
H STREET
EAST H STREET
J STREET
L STREET
EAST L STREET
MAIN STREET
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
PALOMAR STREET
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
TRUCK ROUTES
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE 10.64
BEGINNING AT
NORTH CITY LIMIT
liEu STREET
WILLOW STREET
NORTH CITY LIMIT
BAY BOULEVARD
NORTH CITY LIMIT
BAY BOULEVARD
"l II STREET
TIDELANDS AVENUE
BAY BOULEVARD
WITHIN CITY LIMITS
ilL" STREET
"H" STREET
TRUCK ROUTES (REVISED)
Schedule VI]
BEGINNING AT
E STREET
MAIN STREET
NORTH CITY LIMIT
OTAY LAKES ROAD
NORTH CITY LIMIT
L STREET
G STREET
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
WITHIN CITY LIMITS
H STREET
EAST FRONTAGE ROAD
E STREET/E. FLOWER ST.
BROADWAY
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
HILLTOP DRIVE
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
HILLTOP DRIVE
INTERSTATE 5
MAIN STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
EAST L STREET/NACION AVENUE
.2tP... :<
Page 2. Item ,). ()
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ENDING AT
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
INTERSTATE 805
OTAY LAKES ROAD
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
BON IT A ROAD
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
INTERSTATE 805
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
BROADWAY
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
OTAY LAKES ROAD
IILII STREET
ENDING AT
SOUTH CITY LIMITS
FOURTH AVENUE
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
MILLER DRIVE
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
MAIN STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
"NORTH END II
MAIN STREET
BROADWAY
EAST CITY LIMIT
FOURTH AVENUE
BON IT A ROAD
BROADWAY
HILLTOP DRIVE
OTAY LAKES ROAD
BROADWAY
HILLTOP DRIVE
TELEGRAPH CANYON
ROAD/NACION AVENUE
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
EAST CITY LIMITS
THIRD AVENUE
OTAY LAKES ROAD
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
;J.()
10/22/91
Consideration was given in establishing the truck routes to the impact/effect
of truck noi se and attendant air poll ut i on on the above streets. We found
that most of these routes serve the i ndustri a 1 area of Chul a Vi sta and are
logical choices for truck use. Establishing these streets as truck routes may
reduce truck use in the central area of Chula Vista, especially on residential
streets. These are also good connectors for trucks to and from 1-5 freeway
and I-80S freeway. East H Street has been extended east of I-80S to serve the
easterly part of the City. In addition, truck routes will be established on
Main Street, Palomar Street, Beyer Way, and Anita Street to serve the
commercial activities in the Montgomery area.
Chapter 10.64 (formerly Article 13 of Chapter 19) of the City Code prohibits
vehicles in excess of 6,000 pounds (to be changed to 10,000 pounds) from being
operated on other than truck routes. However, this section also permits truck
use of any City street if it is necessary to -use such a street to del iver or
pick up merchandise or engage in any construction activities on private
property, buildings, etc. Therefore, the recommended truck routes are
intended only to guide trucks through the City streets and do not
automatically prohibit trucks from using any other City street not included on
the 1 i st.
As the City continues to develop, the street network will change. Periodic
review of the truck routes could result in further changes. The use of 1-5,
I-80S and Route 54 freeways could reduce truck use on parallel City streets.
Further changes will be recommended if and when necessary.
FISCAL IMPACT: $1,500 for signs.
WPC 5731E
MA/FR:CY-002
Attachments:
Existing truck routes
Schedule VII Existing Truck Routes Ordinance No. 1966
Code Sections 10.64.010 & 10.64.040 (existing & proposed)
rJ.tJ-.3 /~O -1#
10.64.010 Compliance required when.
Whenever the city council establishes by f~~pl~t!p~ ordinance, and
when signs have been erected giving notice thereof, no person shall operate any
vehicle with a gross weight in excess of ten thousand pounds at any time,
except upon the streets or parts of streets described in Section 10.64.040 and
Schedul e VII attached to and made a part of thi s chapter. (Ord. 2024 g 1
(part), 1983: Ord. 973 g 1 (part), 1966: prior code g 19.13.1(A).)
10.64.040 Load restrictions upon vehicles using certain streets-Schedule VII.
In accordance with Sections 10.64.010 through 10.64.030, pursuant to
f#pl~UpN/~f ordinance of the city council, and when appropriate "Truck
Route" signs are erected giving notice thereof, the movement of all motor
vehicles having a maximum gross weight in excess of ~!~ ten thousand
pounds will be confined to the follow streets:
Name of Street
Beginning at
Ending at
Editor's Note: The substantive acts of the council pertaining to Schedule VII
and truck routes, undertaken by reso 1 ut i on or ordi nance, as requi red by the
Vehicle Code of the state of Cal ifornia, are maintained in the office of the
city clerk, the director of public works and ~he police department.
(Ord. 973 g 1 (part), 1966: prior code g 19.22.1 (part).)
WPC 5776E
;21)..S
10.64.010 Compliance required when.
Whenever the city council estab 1 i shes by reso1 ut ion, and when signs have
been erected giving notice thereof, no person shall operate any vehicle with a
gross wei ght in excess of ten thousand pounds at any time, except upon the
streets or parts of streets described in Section 10.64.040 and Schedule VII
attached to and made a part of this chapter. (Ord. 2024 S 1 (part), 1983:
Ord. 973 S 1 (part), 1966: prior code S 19.13.1(A).)
10.64.020 Exemptions-Commercial delivery vehicles.
The provi s ions of thi s chapter shall not prohi bit any conrnerci a 1 vehi c1 e
coming from an unrestricted street, or portion thereof, as enumerated or
described in Section 10.64.040 and Schedule VII, having ingress and egress by
direct route to and from a restricted street when necessary for the purpose of
making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares and merchandise from or to any
building or structures located on the restricted street or for the purpose of
delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair,
alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon the
restri cted street for whi ch a buil di ng permi t has previ ous1y been obtai ned.
(Ord. 973 S 1 (part), 1966: prior code S 19.13.1 (B).)
10.64.030 Exemptions-Public utility and contractors' vehicles.
The provisions of this chapter shall not be applicable to any vehicle
owned by a public utility or a licensed contractor while necessarily in use in
the construction, installation or repair of any public utility, or to any
vehicle sUbject to the provisions of Sections 1031 through 1036, inclusive, of
the California Public Utilities Code. (Ord. 973 S 1 (part), 1966: prior code
S 19.13.1!C).)
10.64.040 Load restrictions upon vehicles using certain streets-Schedule VII.
In accordance with Sections 10.64.010 through 10.64.030, pursuant to
resolution or ordinance of the city council, and when appropriate "Truck
Route" si gns are erected gi vi ng noti ce thereof, the movement of all motor
vehicles having a maximum gross weight in excess of six thousand pounds will
be confined to the following streets:
Name of Street
Beginning at
Ending at
Editor's Note: The substantive acts of the council pertaining to Schedule VII
and truck routes, undertaken by resolution or ordinance, as required by the
Vehicle Code of the state of California, are maintained in the office of the
city clerk, the director of public works and the police department.
lOrd. 973 S 1 (part), 1966: prior code S 19.22.1 (part).)
.
,;;~., t
431
"
'COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
7u-/5'
,./.,..,...
, 82
Meeting Date
ITEM TITLE: Ordinance """ Amending Ordinance No. 1605
relating to through truck r;c~s r
nJ1 / ~!:.WND READING' AND ADOPTION
SUBMITTED BY: City Engineer,fv (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-!-)
There have been several changes to the Cit~s circulation system
since the existing truck routes were established in 1975. The
purpose of this ordinance is to update the truck route system.
It is my
RECOMMENDATION: ,Place this ordinance on first
,,} reading designating "H" Street between I-80S and Third
" Avenue; and Third Avenue between "H" Street and "L" Street as truck
routes.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The purpose of truck routes is to restrict the flow of truck
traffic within the City on designated streets that due to width
and structural section can better handle truck traffic. The truck
routes as listed below were established in 1975.
Name of Street
Broadway
Fourth Avenue
'E" Street
Bani ta Road
Bonita Road
'H" Street
"J" Street
Industrial Blvd.
"L" Street'
Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Otay Lakes Road
Beginning at
North City limit
North City limit
Bay Boulevard
"E" Street
Willow Street
Bay Boulevard
Tidelands
"L" Street
Bay Boulevard
"L" Street
Within City limits
End ing at
South City limit
South City limit
Bani ta Road
I-80S
Otay Lakes Road
Thi rd Avenue
Broadway
South Ci ty Limi t
Telegraph Canyon Road
Ouy .Lakes Road
Two important segments - "H" Street between Third Avenue and
I-80S; and Third Avenue were not included at that time because
I-805 was not open to traffic at "H" Street and the travel lanes
on Third Avenue were of substandard width, to safely accommodate
truck traffic.
I-80S has since been completed and Third Avenue has recently
widened to provide for standard (12 ft. wide) travel lanes.
designation of these two streets will allow for truck access
I-805 to the commercial establishments along Third Avenue.
FISCAL IMPACT:
signs is $900.
been
The
from
The estimated cost for installing "Truck Route"
GRH: fpw/CY008
~R. '?
t'J:,.
f
,
~:
,
;1
>
'.
Revised 4/6/82
ORDINANCE NO. 1966
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
CHAPTER 10.64 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO THROUGH TRUCK ROUTES
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain
as follows:
SECTION I: That Schedule VII of Chapter 10.64 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby amended to
read as follows by adding the following through truck routes:
Name of Street
Beginning at
'"
Broadway
Fourth Avenue
~ Third Avenue
~ "E" Street
~ i Bonita Road
.
Bonita Road
'H" Street
'J" Street
Industrial Blvd.
"L" Street
Telegraph Canyon
Otay Lakes Road
Road
North City Limit
North city Limit
"H" Street
Bay Boulevard
"E" Street
Willow Street
Bay Boulevard
Tidelands
"L" Street
Bay Boulevard
"L" Street
Within City Limits
SECTION II:
full force and effect
adoption.
Ending at
South City Limit
South City Limit
"L" Street
Bonita Road
1-805
Otay Lake s Road
1-805
Broadway
South City Limit
Telegraph Canyon
Otay Lakes Road
Road
This ordinance shall take effect and be in
on the thirty-first day from and after its
Approved as to form by
Presented
by
J -, "
t!' v(-;7"~
City
~
!::-L
John P. Lippitt,
Engineer
,,).{) ~ if
c;
I
I
I
i I
i
I I
I
I I
City Attorney
I
i
.
,i
I
,
'":"
FIRST READ AT A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
.
:ITY OF CHULA VI STA, CALI FORN lA, HELD January 5 . 19 8~, AND
. !NALLY PASSED AND ADOPTED AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF HELD January 12 J
BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE, TO-WIT:
YES:
. YES:
~ .:BSTAIN:
r''''-SENT:
,
Councilmen:
Councilmen:
Coc.ncilmen :
Councilmen:
McCand1iss, Scott, Cox, Gi11ow, Campber11
None
None
None
I
ill
~... 'lEST: . ,~/ ~ :;Jt~
' I / City Clerk
I ~
,
J'.tATE OF CALIFORNIA )
ruNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s.
trY OF CHULA VISTA )
!
;
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California,
) HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full. true and correct copy of
1966
~,
!
. \DINANCE NO.
'TED
~.
t"'
~t
(seal)
,
I'
, i
. and that the some has not been amended or repealed.
,
.
. I
, I
I I
: f
, i
i I
City Clerk
i
,
I
i I
II
I,
, I
] !
, ,
PROOF OF PUBUCATION
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
b01j/j
,ATE OF CALIFORNIA.
:ounty of Son Diego:
CV16406
I am a citizen af the United States and a
,esident af the County aforesaid; i am oyer
the age af eighteen years, and not a party
10 or interested in the above-entitled matter.
I am the principal clerk af the printer af the
CHULA VISTA STAR-NEWS, a newspaper af
general circulation, printed and published
lWlCE WEEKLY in the City af Chula Vista,
and the South Bay Judicial District, County af
San Diego, State of California, under the date
01 Aug. 8. 1932, Case Number 71752; that
the notice, af which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil),
has been published In each regular and entire
Osue of said newspaper and not in any supple-
ment thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
Proof of Publication of
Ordinance
................................................................................
#1966
Chula Vista
,ed at .................................................................
-.
Jan 17
82
in the year 19...........
"rtify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
foregoing is true and correct.
. -~ _. -... . -,' p ....._~.,... .
~;;;~~.~,...,~
::incipal Clerk
,/1
\
II 19.3001
SCHEDULE VII.
CHULA VISTA CITY CODE
.
II 19.3001
LOAD RESTRICTIONS UPON VEHICLES USING CERTAIN
STREETS.
In accordance with Article 13 of Chapter 19, pursuant to
resolution or ordinance of the City Council, and when appropriate
"Truck Route" signs are erected giving notice thereof, the
movement of all motor vehicles having a maximum gross weight in
excess of six thousand (6,000) pounds will be confined to the
following streets:
Name of Street
"E" Street
Fourth Avenue
Broadway
,/"L" Street
~ "H" Street
(
/ "J" Street
~ Bay Boulevard
_ Bonita Road
~ Industrial Blvd.
~ Otay Lakes Road
v Telegraph Canyon Rd.
(
..
Beginning At
Bay Boulevard
North City Limit
North City Limit
Bay Boulevard
Bay Boulevard
Tidelands Avenue
,
North City Limit
"E" Street
"L" Street
Within City Limit
"L" Street
e;2P"/~
Ending At
Bonita Road
South City Limit
South City Limit
Telegraph Canyon Road
Interstate 805
Broadway
South City Limit
Central Avenue
(within City limit)
South City Limit
Otay Lakes Road
S' ....,~ IQ.'
II IJ' f T"1
~ ~J i'if;!i ,I I ~ I
III 'Pb ,I' ( t- rn,~ ~ ,
':'i &-~ thfi U
'J@lJ ',~
~II'-~"'!' ~ " ' - ~ ; "
~ 'I',:'U r, ,,~ J.. ~ ,;: I,
I
_,"' ~ ~ :>c
'l/7,,/ ' '.J," ,,'. .\ ,;;" "ii
!,1l ,iLC ,I " ~ 'I. ~ c "" i>. ;
-, " .' - .' ,.,,-,
, .. ~,I.\I" ' wF ,.
~ """ ,.' '" .. ^ "w.. ~
IDa: ',m! ' . "C.',, " . . ~
n ' I \,
.. '" -1- L -' Y " 'II I' I ,'''' "',' \
I.',""''' "_ ' ,iJ.~ "" '1" \,": - %
II ''',' " .' ..' , ' ' ,
'//C ' < ,I" ',">"'> .' .,
I N,L,,', .. ," .'. ~,,' . ,I'","" ;!W,,"" ,~
"""" . ..' ~ . i I" '. "'" t · · '<>4;
',' .,' t" '; "",;1.!R':':;}' '~.. "'1';:" t':'.."l: 'I~'k-\',
I "," 11'. ' " <J/, ,,' ,\\;;;,"ri.?,""~:l '?', lf~:/:" I,',
.. .."".,. ' ',0" ,.",. '" ' ,'~' ' '. ,1, \ ,"'f'. i:J:!f ,
~ .> ~'L~ ' . ':!i(i\"t"""" "if';, _~'~o '\("~~I~
or<' :'~~ ' ". ~ ' ~ " ' '..
, I,' ,',1'il\", ,_ " . >' " ,,"'!.:"''''~ ",'7 ",.",..;
A 1,~10..~ '1' ,,'., ",..~1i" ; f ~, ~~
~ 3)Ms"";.;' ,"It'. I ~ ~,' ~~,';Wyiffl co :\~. I =>":,e,,: ,<~ ,Jt,(~"
'I' I, j ." " I ~' .'; t~
',' . '. fl ,- , 1 , ~. flY" · " .x"
! >'1"_ ' j~u ri~. o' \ \ ,'\:--'[\/' ,I,:.l
I I ~ I ~ Y \ ~.: ' J '. H~.;,. i ~, '
" ' .J ~ " 'P \1 ',' ',. ".... ,,1,,/ ' ~1\~J;i,:
_ 'I " ""'1 r;~\\~
" ' 12.'! I'i'~:" ~,... -6"""",,' ~ i
," ".,;;'''- ''''.1 'fiT!.. , '
~ _ /. ' ,i ,:2:/ ( ',' P?~'.
" ...-/1' ' JI>'
,"
c
.
..
.
..
....
o
"-
....
....,
"-
CD
....
-I
:c
c
o
"
:c
o
c
-I
m
en
0\ '
=~
/',
no';;
, "
, '.
,~~c l,n,IT , ~
- l. \'\;./ ,\.-- ~ ~-
\"" 'C,.,:tl..
.\\i~~~~~~ -'
-1 '".:o:~~.{\l~ - ~.... ','
c--~;"''\, .~.-;1'" '
"t1N'(;~~~I' ,
"'~~'~ ". .'
~'~ J,fr ~~'~'~ '-,CI
]~\ I L",
. ;L 'ri~J: '
1~r-1- -<
I ~ ~ t-
I t> ~y, \
'I': '
o !..~M ' '-.
(~~-
"U m
:IJ ><
0 Ui
"U
0 -I
VI Z
m Ii)
c
.
I I
I
I
I I
,
l
--
" .
r
,
,
,~ ~'\I
~\ \ .
, I ,~
';. \ \
. , .
gj
~, I \ :-~. j
,-
I
,
~
.,
'i
\ \
~O J
'\ I .",,"
\ l~' ~\ j ;'Tf '
J j _ _L"~ > .' -
I" ",,'ili.l' '-, "
'\ - /~ " ,", '
~,\ ' ;1/' . ,
. ' ;" -: .~q ,\
I;~"'" ,\,'
,: ~Q-~':' ,,' ~\'~;~~
.1 ' '\ .",- ..
- ./-
,.
_,__ J
\ /
, "
\ ~~.I ' ......
\ ~~\,' <
~-,!~'-
\ ~ d
\ .
.
,
/.
. ----
.
:~~)'.'
-wr:,if}""" ':'
"..''1'~~);'C(
" \..
"
,
-
~I)~/J
'"
"""-'-
lAME OF STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
BONITA ROAD
BROADWAY
"E" STREET
FOURTH AVENUE
-H- STREET
INDUSTRIAL BLVD.
"J' STREET
"L" STREET
OTAY LAKES ROAD
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
THIRD AVENUE
The revised schedule is:
10.64.040
lAME OF STREET
I-S
BAY BOULEVARD
BEYER WAY
BROADWAY
EAST LAKE PARKWAY
FOURTH AVENUE
INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD
-MARINA PARKWAY
MAXWELL ROAD
OTAY LAKES ROAD
THIRD AVENUE
W-E
ANITA STREET
BONITA ROAD
C STREET
E STREET
F STREET
H STREET
EAST H STREET
J STREET
L STREET
EAST L STREET
,
MAIN STREET
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
PALOMAR STREET
TELEGRAPH CANYON
ROAD
TRUCK ROUTES
CNULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE 10.64
BEGIIIIIG AT
NORTH CITY LIMIT
"E" STREET
WILLOW STREET
NORTH CITY LIMIT
BAY BOULEVARD
NORTH CITY LIMIT
BAY BOULEVARD
"L" STREET
TIDELANDS AVENUE
BAY BOULEVARD
WITHII CITY LIMITS
"L" STREET
"H" STREET
TRUCK ROUTES (REVISED)
Schedule VII
BEGIIIIIG AT
E STREET
MAIl STREET
NORTH CITY LIMIT
OTAY LAKES ROAD
NORTH CITY LIMIT
L STREET
G STREET
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
WITHIN CITY LIMITS
N STREET
EAST FRONTAGE ROAD
E STREET/E. FLOWER ST.
BROADWAY
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
NILLTOP DRIVE
BAY BOULEVARD
BAY BOULEVARD
HILLTOP DRIVE
INTERSTATE 5
MAli STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
EAST L STREET/NACIOI AVENUE
.;Il-/?
,
.
EIDIIG AT
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
INTERSTATE 805
OT A Y LAKES ROAD
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
BONITA ROAD
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
INTERSTATE 805
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
BROADWAY
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
OTAY LAKES ROAD
"L" STREET
ENDIIG AT
SOUTH CITY LIMITS
FOURTH AVENUE
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
MILLER DRIVE
SOUTH CITY LIMIT
MAIN STREET
BAY BOULEVARD
"NORTH END"
MA I N STREET
BROADWAY
EAST CITY LIMIT
FOURTH AVENUE
BONITA ROAD
BROADWAY
HILLTOP DRIVE
OTAY LAKES ROAD
BROADWAY
HILLTOP DRIVE
TELEGRAPH CANYON
ROAD/NACION AVENUE
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
EAST CITY LIMITS
THIRD AVENUE
OT A Y LAKES ROAD
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item :l. J
Meeting Date 10/22/91
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Assessment District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
a) Resolution /4>38"'0 Ordering certain changes and
modifications to the Engineer's "Report" in Assessment
District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
b) Resolution //';:$ [{ J Approving agreements for Assessment
District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
c) Resolution I/,:3 8' ~ Confirming the assessment, ordering the
improvements made, together with appurtenances, and approving
the Engi neer' s "Report" in Assessment Di stri ct No. 90-1 (Salt
Creek I)
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public WOrk~ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-K-)
c'
On September 17, 1991, Council adopted the resolution of intention to order
the acquisition and financing of certain infrastructure serving the Salt Creek
I development pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 and set a
public hearing for October 22, 1991 for the purpose of hearing public
testimony.
All owners of property within the proposed assessment district have been
ma il ed a not ice of the pub 1 i c heari ng i ncl udi ng the proposed assessment to
their land.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Municipal Improvement Act of 1913 is a financing mechanism which allows
the future residents to finance infrastructure improvements through assessment
district bonds with payments collected with their property taxes.
This is an acquisition assessment district wherein the developer is
constructing the public improvements and the City will acquire them upon
completion with funds derived from the sale of bonds. The estimated cost of
the improvements are assessed to land within the assessment district and paid
off by the property owners over a 25-year peri od. New home buyers have the
option of paying off the assessment and including the cost with their
mortgage. However, since this would raise the amount of the down payment and
woul d be paid at a hi gher interest rate for a longer peri od of time, thi s
option is rarely, if ever, exercised.
,).1-1
Page 2, Item c2.1
Meeting Datel0/22/91
The improvements proposed to be fi nanced by the assessment di stri ct i ncl ude
circulation element streets, including East "H" Street and collector streets,
backbone water and sewer systems, recl aimed water faci 1 ities, backbone storm
drain systems, dry utilities, certain landscaping and irrigation systems to
protect DIF eligible streets. Intract streets, sewer, water and drainage
improvements are financed by the developer and not included in the assessment
district.
The total amount proposed to be assessed to the parcel s in the assessment
district is $5.13 million. This includes construction, engineering design,
inspect i on and admi ni strat i on costs, and other i nci denta 1 costs as shown in
the fo 11 owi ng:
DIF Street (East "H" Street)
Collector Streets
Water System
Sewer System
Reclaimed Water System
Landscaping, Irrigation, Sound Walls, etc.
Storm Drain System
Dry Util ities
Contingency
TOTAL
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
$1,381,896.00
291,731.00
209,393.47
139,896.18
218,292.86
720,042.08
874,427.01
155,000.00
260.878.26
$4,251,556.86
Project Management
Assessment Engineering
Design Engineering
Utility Consultant
80nd Counsel
Financial Consultant
Landscape Architect
Soils Engineering
Construction Surveying & Staking
Public Agency Project Management
Bond Premium
Permit Fees
Printing, Advertising & Posting
Ut il ity Fees
Less Utility Refunds
Printing of Bid Documents
Bond Printing, Servicing & Registration
SUBTOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION & EXPENSES
$ 16,000.00
56,650.00
65,000.00
11,335.00
35,126.38
63,000.00
29,641. 00
44,111.00
63,886.00
45,700.00
653.00
180,019.00
1,000.00
144,790.00
(116,349.00)
20,000.00
10.000.00
$670,562.38
(615.955.89)
$4,306,163.35
Less Developer Contribution
:l.1'" .2
Page 3, Item 02 /
Meeting Datel0/22/91
COST OF ISSUANCE
Capitalized Interest (6 mo. @ 8%)
Bond Discount (2%)
Reserve Fund (10%)
SUBTOTAL
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT
$205,055.40
102,527.70
512.638.49
$820,221. 59
$5,126,384.94
Since construction of all of the improvements is not yet complete, the amount
proposed to be assessed to the district and the individual assessments
represent not to exceed amounts. There is a cont i ngency amount of
approximately ten percent of the construction budget i ncl uded in the amount
assessed to the district and upon completion of the improvements, the final
construct i on cost wi 11 be revi ewed and the assessments reduced, as
appropriate. The bond sale, which will be held at the completion of
construct ion in January 1992, wi 11 also be adjusted in accordance wi th the
final construction cost.
The amount proposed to be assessed to the district is approximately $265,000
less than was proposed at the time the resolution of intention was adopted in
mid-September. This is due to a modification in the pricing structure of the
dwelling units.
The proposed assessments are as fo 11 ows: si ngl e family detached $13,049.61,
town homes $8,980.27, and condominiums $7,236.96. These assessments represent
the maximum amount assessable under the City's criteria regarding the maximum
tax (2% of dwelling unit price) to be levied on a residential parcel property.
Table III (attached) illustrates the total amount of taxes and assessments
(except the open space maintenance district). The lowest priced unit of each
dwell ing type is at 2% of market value. All other units of a dwell ing type
have a total tax burden of less than 2% (see Table III). There are three
resolutions on today's agenda which, if adopted, accomplish the following:
1. "Resolution ordering certain changes and modifications to the Engineer's
Report." There have been several changes to the Engi neer' s Report
resulting from routine adjustments and a reduction in density of the
condominium units. The reduction in density has resulted in higher
assessments to the units than was proposed at the time the Prel iminary
Engineer's Report was approved in mid-September. The property owner has
signed a consent and waiver form for the higher assessments.
2. "Resolution approving agreements." In order to procedurally acquire the
water system, reclaimed water system and electrical system, it is
necessary for the City to enter into three-party agreements with the
developer, Otay Water District, SDG&E and Pacific Bell for the acceptance
and conveyance of improvements constructed as part of the Assessment
District improvements. This resolution approves those agreements. There
is no cost or liability involved in entering into these agreements.
~/'3
Page 4, Item .2/
Meeting Datel0/22/91
3. "Resolution confirming the assessments." This resolution approves the
Fi na 1 Engi neer' s Report, confi rms and 1 evi es the assessments contai ned
therein, and approves the mechanism by which the improvements may be
acquired when they are completed.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Baldwin Company has deposited the one per cent
assessment district initiation charge of $51,263.85 with the City. All
assessment district costs including City staff cost will be paid through the
issuance of 1915 Act bonds.
LdeT/AY-081
WPC 5780E
JJ.'I/J.'':'f
THE cm OF CHULA. YlSTA PAR71" DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, On aU matters
which will require discretionIiI)' action on the part of the City Councn, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The fonowing information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial Interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, Jl1aterial sUIJplier.
The Baldw1n Compart1
FN ProJects, Inc.
-
2. If any person Identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares In the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership. .
3. If 1iI'i)' person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
ti uster of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Councll within the past twelve months? Yes_
No ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
cOAtfg'itgI~~:po~.oJ1a~~vi..~ss~ffid R1~I8Qresent rCWe~~~~ tl).e ~~ thlsDil~~' Ke1 tner
i~il.~HHi Bflg-ifl,""J(ffi'i.;..~~~:~iaR8 [AAughnesse~ M::a,. tt,...nun _.Rrnun.R"rppr
M....T....~.; _~ 1'!_.....I1I? D::Iol11 r:,,~'F Burns and Hentsch}
R"lnuin _ Claudia Troisi, Elizabeth Long, Steve Doyle
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contn'buted ~e than $1,000 to a
Councitmember in the current or preceding election perled? Yes _ No _ If yes, state which
Councllmember(s):
Person Is deCined u: OAnyindlvidual.fIrm, co-partnuJhlp.jolnl venture, aJJociation, loclal club,fraternal organizlllion, corporation,
eslt1te, trUst, receiver, syndicate, thh and allY other COUllly. city and counfl)l, city. lllIlIIlctpalll)l, district or other political subdivi.slon,
or any other group or combination acting cu n unlt.o
(NOTE: Attach Qddltional pages as neu$S8l')')
10/17/91
Date:
~/? 17 ~ '
(A___r.~ _ """'t-.f'~-lJ\ ~
Signature of contractor/applicant
Claudia Troisi / The Baldwin Company
r....11~\A:DISCLOSB,1XT)
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[ReYilcd: tI/.!OI9O)
eJ )-5
ATTACHMENT ,'!~'
\
)
I
/
-
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No, 90-1
( SALT CREEK I )
" \ '01 THI
'\ '\ CITY OF CHULA VISTA
" "'....... COUNTY 0' .... _00. IT A n Of CALIFORNIA
", '--
----
........ Utul
\ ,,1- -' , i I . ,
I ,_'-)r!-r~p:m?i!:
L
;
€!I
~
GRAPHIC ICALE
'~'-~ ~~
IIN,n11
,..0". lOon
'00
I
0
<\'
"'.
-'
w
:>
'"
:i
'"'
::Ii .
i
.
.
.
.
.
/
1
I
/ /
/ /
, 1 /
1/ 1
~~ /
I 1
I 1
1 I
1 /
/4;- 1
I~ I
I';' I
I,' I
1 /~ 1
It;- 1
1411
1 /
/ /
I /
" / /
~", '-' 1
')"~ c..
~ ""..,
/" ~/j/t
"
8
y'1~NITY MAP
I16~AUI
._~ ,"
.,-1
.#
."
","~ ......'.
.' )
......
ID!I<'I.'WY&.
.,..--,- -- ..........,
LEGEND
,__ _... ,...' "........ _w____. Of
......_ .._........, I......' t_ ."..... _n t10I
CI"_.,,..M'OI'OIM.A....UU...............~~
'* ........ -----
"ililiUi'iMlOO
---
"ruG' .........'
.--.
:;:: r..-u ....A
......
.,.-
@
.-.-,.-
_"".__ _..,., __.,,,..n.,..........fA
__WI'" -_____
""~.
crn__"'_'.
.
.
.
.
.
MFS
..au... II,,,,
..... ....
T.M...... . C,lIlollI'" .2,.0
0'14)....U.O
-'l1li-""" ..___
II... "',"M _ '" I&AH.. u......,
__n.".......",.. _" --.. "..~,..
.........,"".,~
l
~.,,"n...
-"..-
_""'......400
..
,;)./- ?
2;01- (o""C')I'-o
"'......
:>u._ cd"':C\J..t
:>1-2; (")0).... co
!j:Z::J C'IlM"~""_
2;* r--,...COa:l
::e~N
'"
0 IDIDIDCD
UJ I- 01010101
(/)...JZ'" tDcDtDcO
0<2:1 C")C')C')M
c..1-(/)O "''''''''''
OO~'" f'o,.,..."",,....
",I-
"-
)- I- ****
Z UJ 00)0)0
UJu.::> 0(1)11)0)
~o<i! C\i"":"': .
UJ >
"-
OMCOe')
~ OtnMOI
~~ gariC\i<D
"'-",
01- <':1."';.<0.1'-:
I- NNNN
'" 8888
~~ gggci
"';!
~'"
0 0000
ffi::!6 0000
1-<- gggci
<>
;:<
(/)...J:g 0000
IC!~~~
~OM ..............
/:~
zZ
::>0
00
0
o . 1,t)1/)1t)I/)
UJ~' 01 crJ 0101
1-<- ,...;,..:,...;,...:
<:>, 1"--"'1'-0""
:>zo co IQCO CD
FZ'"
",<0
UJ <
fa...J. NNNN
~~CCl.CC:
I-<N .........;!
<:>'
:>z"'
FZ"
",<0
UJ <
coo....
'Cx MCOtOcn
0," o:icricria:i
Z'j' 10.......<0
NMC")C")
o'
u.::>
0'"
'Co ~~~~
0'" "':"":"":C\J
Zui ....(")1:":1...,
~>: -
00
* NNCO'"
UJ"'O M,..It'IO
cD 0"": .
(/)wm OO...N
<~.. N.t'l'"".It).
cof-q ...............
, OOOg_
0
'" 0 ggg z
0 ~CI)UJ arj.,fI:lSV')"
Z <UJo ...NM.
2;~-
Z \; F~g:
0 a: '"
!:i I- UJ
'"
'" i5 @WLU g~~~z
::J I-
" Z 1-0:'" =.,,":N.M.
0 UJ <<i5 .......- ....
~<1Jj 2;::>0
FOo
l-t)ct;I t3(1)u.
;;!5~o;
t-:sc.?~ 2;
o <. I- :>
I-:)::.::od" OUJ Z
XUJ-
IOwa:: ::>,,- ;;
=u.CI:W 8/: 0
wOUi:CI '" 0
~~~g "- Z
0
~o(}jg 0
...." ""
e\!<<! cqq
0" "'"'
".. "'-
"'.... "'0
aim" 0):;:
........ ........
~C'! C'!C'!
&Iii! ii!ii!
"'''' "''''
.;" "''''
** **
8:g ..'"
C\i"": ~CC!
8~ "'''
.."
cio:i ..oj
ON 00
"0 N"
NM Me?
00 88
00
gg gg
00 00
00 00
gg dci
"'''' "''''
"":1'-0; 1'-:1'-:
- - - -
"'''' "''''
"'''' "''''
:;::; :;::;:
"" ""
"'''' "''''
"'''' "''''
~~ ,..:,..:
0_ - -
"'''' NN
a:icO aim
-'" - -
"" ....
"'" "''''
CC!~ "':"':
_N ""
"'" ........
"'0 00
"'''' "....
cOlt) dui
'" N ""
.....(D. I"-o.CCI.
- - - -
88 00
00
00 00
011)" uil/'j
~~ ~~
0'" N'"
N_ O"
"''': Il).~
- -
UJ
2;
0
x
Z
~
I-
-"''''
"'.."
~I<i~
qC\j,M.
,,"'....
u;;o;o
~~~
000
riMe?
-- -
*"'*
8-'"
"'''
N"':"":
0"''''
0"_
000
~~:$
......; .;
888
ggg
000
000
ggg
"""
"'''''''
MMM
............
......
~~~
C\!.t't(\j.
- --
"""
"""
cicici
NNN
"'........
0"''''
8S8
"'''''''
"'''''''
-........
rcioicri
0....
NNN
"'"....
"''''....
"':aigj
,,"'....
-"'....
C'iNC'i
800
00
000
GSIlfIl5
0"'"
NNN
"'-....
-"'....
"..'"
":NN
o
UJ
X
~~~
,"-I:-
z2;!ij
V)~c
<ri
'"
i1i<ri
>'"
..i1i
->
"''''
ON
u.",
*0
ou.
~*
...."
~~
~~
~~
<<
:>:>
ZZ
ZZ
<<
00
~~
2;2;
~~
UJUJ,
.
.
~/,g/
RESOLUTION NO. 16344
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA PASSING ON THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER, GIVING
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL, ANO SETTING A TIME AND PLACE FOR
PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has
instituted proceedings for the installation of certain public works of
improvement and appurtenances under provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act
of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and, .
WHEREAS, there has been prepared and filed with the legislative body a
"Report" provided for in Section 10203 and 10204 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, and this "Report" as now presented for consideration;
and,
WHEREAS, a Resolution of Intention for this improvement was previously
adopted by the legislative body; and the "Report" as now presented shall stand
as the "Report" for the purpose of subsequent proceedings hereunder.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION II. That the "Report" of the Engineer referred to hereinabove is
considered adopted, passed upon, and preliminary approved,
as follows:
A. That the plans and specifications for the proposed
improvements to be made, contained in said "Report" be,
and they are hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
B. That the Engineer's estimate of the itemized and total
costs and expenses of said acquisition, where necessary,
and improvements, and of the incidental expenses in
connection therewith, contained in said "Report", be,
and each of them are hereby preliminarily approved and
adopted;
C.. That the di agrams showing the Assessment Di stri ct
referred to and described in said Resolution of
Intention, and also the boundaries and dimensions of the
respective subdivisions of land within said Assessment
District, and the same existed at the time of the
passage of said Resolution of Intention, each of which
),1-9
Resolution No. 16344
Page 2
subdivisions have been given a separate number upon said
diagram, as contained in said "Report". be, and it is
hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
D. That the proposed assessment upon the several
subdivisions of land in said Assessment District, in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by
such subdivisions. respectively. from said acquisition
and improvements. and of the incidental expenses
thereof. as contained in said "Report". be and they are
hereby preliminarily approved and adopted;
E. That th~ maps and descriptions of the lands and
easements to be acquired, as contained in said "Report"
be, and the same are hereby preliminarily approved.
SECTION III. That said "Report" shall stand as the Engineer's "Report"
for the purpose of all subsequent proceedings had pursuant
to said Resolution of Intention.
SECTION IV. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT ON TUESDAY. THE 22ND DAY OF
OCTOBER, 1991, AT THE HOUR OF 6:00 O'CLOCK P.M., IN THE
REGULAR MEETING PLACE OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY. BEING THE
COUNCIL CHAMBERS. CITY HALL, ANY AND ALL PERSONS HAVING ANY
OBJECTIONS TO THE PROPOSED WORK, OR ASSESSMENT. OR EXTENT OF
THE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT. OR TO THE PROPOSED GRADES. MAY
APPEAR AND SHOW CAUSE WHY SAID WORK SHOULD NOT BE DONE OR
CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION
AND THE "REPORT" OF THE ENGINEER. PROTESTS MUST BE IN
WRITING AND MUST BE DELIVERED TO THE CITY CLERK AT OR BEFORE
THE TIME SET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING.
SECTION V. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of
said Public Hearing by causing to be conspicuously posted on
all open streets within the Assessment District. not more
than 300 feet apart on each street so posted, but not less
than 3 in all, notice of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention and of this Resolution. all in accordance with the
provisions of said Division 12.
SECTION VI. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to give notice of
said Public Hearing and of the passage of the Resolution of
Intention and this Resolution by causing such notice to be
published in accordance with Section 6066 of the Government
Code. in the newspaper for all publications as required by
law and as necessary for completion of this Assessment
District.
~J'It/
Resolution No. 16344
Page 3
SECTION VII. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to mail notice of
said Public Hearing and the adoption of the Resolution of
Intention and of the filing of the "Report" to all persons
owing real property proposed to be assessed, whose names and
addresses appear on the last equalized assessment roll for
County taxes prior thereto, or as known to said City Clerk,
and to all other persons as prescribed in accordance with
the provisions of said Division 12.
SECTION VIII. That the City Clerk is hereby further directed to file a
copy of the proposed boundary map in the Office of the
County Recorder within fifteen (15) days of the adoption of
the proposed boundary map; said boundary map to be in the
manner and form as set forth in Division 4.5 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
,i- ik 4rO
Y!~
jOhn P. Li pp' tt
Director of Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
;l.J.. / /
Resolution No. 16344
Page 4
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 17th day of September. 1991. by the following vote:
YES: Counci 1 members: Grasser Horton. Malcolm, Moore, Nader.
Rindone
NOES: Councilmember: None
ABSENT: Counci lmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Council members : None
F ~_____
Tim Nader. Mayor
ATTEST:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A.Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16344 was duly passed, approved.
and adopted by the City Council held on the 17th day of September. 1991.
Executed this 17th day of September, 1991.
")'I-/~
.,.
OlIDBR OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
OCTOBER 22, 1991
PUBLIC HEARING
FOR CONSIDERATION:
HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT
ACT OF 1913".
MAYOR:
Announce that this is the time and place fixed for
public hearing on protests or objections to
Resolution of Intention, Engineer's "Report" and
other matters relating to ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
(SALT CREEK I).
the
the
all
90-1
CITY CLERK:
Announce that notice of the Public Hearing has been given
in the manner and form as required by law and that a
Certificate of Compliance is on file certifying that
notice was given in the following ways:
Posting all public streets within the District
Mailing notice to property owners within the District
Filing proposed boundary map in Office of County
Recorder
Publication of Notice of improvement
STAFF:
Explain purpose for Public Hearing.
Describe extent of works of improvement and boundaries
of Assessment District.
Present and summarize "Report".
Explain method and formula of assessment spread.
Report on Acquisition/Financing Agreement.
Report on utility agreements/assignments.
BRD OF STAFF REPORT - OPBN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
~J -);1
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PAGE TWO
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING.
OCTOBER 22, 1991
MAYOR.
ASK EACH SPEAKER TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY.
First, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak against the
improvement, the Assessment District, or the method of spread.
Then, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak in favor of the
proceedings.
STAFF:
Report on final percentage of protests (\ of area) received.
Presentation of any proposed changes or modifications to the
Engineer's "Report" and the Assessment District.
STAFF/COUNCIL: Discussion.
MAYOR. Declare Public Hearing CLOSED.
II!' THE LBGISLATIVB BODY WISHES TO PROCEED:
CITY COUNCIL.
Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS.
riate changes and modifications to the proceedings
"Report" .
Orders approp-
and Engineer's
CITY COUNCIL.
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS. This Resolution accepts the
Acquisition/Financing Agreement and the assignments with San Diego
Gas & Electric, Pacific Bell and the otay Water District.
CITY COUNCIL.
Adopt RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS: Formal action ordering the
improvements, confirming the assessments and approving the final
Engineer's "Report".
. . .
eJ-J- /1/
AGRBEKBNT AND ASSIGNKBNT
THIS AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT is by and between BALDWIN VISTA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
("Assignor"), the CITY OF CHULA VISTA ("ABBignee") and SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC
COMPANY ("Utility").
WHEREAS, Assignee has initiated proceedings pursuant to the "MUnicipal Improvement
Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for financing the acquisition and/or construction of certain public
improvements, including utility facilities, in an assessment district known and
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to
as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee have entered into an Acquisition/Financing Agreement
("Acquisition/Financing Agreement") approved by the legislative body of ABBignee,
whereby Assignor has agreed to construct or install certain public improvements,
including utility facilities in the Assessment District and Assignee has agreed to
reimburse Assignor for the costs of such utility facilities pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement from the proceeds of bonds
issued pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915"; and,
WHEREAS, Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California
specifically provides that before the ordering of any work and/or acquisition where
facilities or improvements will be owned, managed or controlled by any other public
agency or utility, the legislative body of Assignee shall enter into an agreement
with said public agency or utility which will have the ownership, management and
control for said facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto enter into this Agreement for acquisition of the utility
facilities, their conveyance and provisions regarding any applicable refundings
pursuant to the provisions of Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed between the parties as follows.
SECTION 1. Except as provided in Section 2 hereinbelow, the undersigned does agree
and assign to Assignee, all of the undersigned's obligations, rights,
title and interest in and to the contracts (collective, the "Contracts")
identified as followsl
Agreement for Extension and Construction of Gas, Work Order No.
1426900, Salt Creek I - Phase 1
Agreement for Extension and Construction of Gas, Work Order No.
1426940, Salt Creek I - Phase 2
Initial:
rf-
;{I)-
"".,-..................... f'l?r intvR&'iaA ami eeI\6t..._c.L':'ou of ea.""
-14J~il0. ial~ ~rgglt I P~a9a J
Herb 9!'Ele!' 11s.
Agreement for Underground Electric Extensions to
Residential Subdivisions, Work Order No. 2367000,
Phase 1
and within New
Salt Creek I -
021-/~
Agreement for Underground
Residential Subdivisions,
Phase 2
Electric Extensions to
Work order No. 2367250,
and within New
5al t Creek I
SECTION 2. Assignor shall, following the effective date of this Assignment, retain
all duties, liabilities and obligations as set forth in Sections 19.0,
21.0, 22.0 and 25.0 of the "Underground Electric General Conditions for
Distribution, Service Syatems Construction and Gas Trench", which has
been incorporated into the Contracts. Assignor shall also retain any
and all right to any refunds or payments from Utility as provided for
under the terms and conditions of the Contracts.
Assignee's acceptance of these assignments is contingent upon the
successful formation of the Assessment District, and this Agreement and
Assignment shall become effective after proceedings have been taken and
funds are available as necessary to carry out the terms thereof, and
this Agreement and Assignment has been entered into before the ordering
by Assignee of the work and/or acquisition for this Assessment District,
and no refundable amount shall be assessed to the property owners within
the boundaries of the Assessment District.
SECTION 3. Assignor and Assignee agree that Assignor's right to the reimbursement
for the costs of construction and installation of the utility facilities
subject to this Agreement and Assignment shall be governed by the terms
and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement.
DATED: 1(:0.-/'-/'&1 (
BALDWIN ~STA DEVELO~MENT COMPAN~
By: cl2L ~,
~~.~
Title:
The undersigned, the Assignee above referred to, hereby accepts this Assignment
subject to all its terms and conditions.
DATED:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
Title:
We consent to the foregoing Assignment. without such consent being a novation.
DATED:
(0 - r7~?'
5AN DIEGO
8R/;:;OMPANY
G11J ~UJ=.IC
By:
Title:
,),/-1(,
ASSIGNMENT OF CONTRACT
AND AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the city of Chula Vista, California ("Assignee")
has initiated proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913," being Division 12 of the streets and Highways Code
of the state of California, to form an assessment district known
and designated as Assessment District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
("Assessment District") for the purpose of financing the con-
struction and installation of certain public utility facilities
and improvements; and
WHEREAS, the property owner, F. N. Projects, Inc. ("As-
signor") has commenced construction of certain of those public
utility facilities, which are integral and necessary as a part of
the Assessment District, which said facilities are intended to be
funded and included within the bond proceeds for said Assessment
District; and,
WHEREAS, the Assignor and Assignee contemplate and intend
that this Assignment shall constitute and satisfy the require-
ments of Streets and Highways Code section 10110 and the parties
further acknowledge that Assignee's financing of said facilities
is contingent upon the confirmation of assignments and ordering
of improvements pursuant to Assignee's proceedings under the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913."
NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Assignor does hereby assign
to Assignee, all of the undersigned's obligations, rights, title
and interest in that certain utility agreement relating to the
installation and construction of certain utility facilities as
hereinafter described:
. Agreement for Construction of a Potable and a Reclaimed
Water System for Salt Creek I, unit 1, dated April 15,
1991.
. Agreement for Construction of a Water System for Salt
Creek I, unit 2, dated April 15, 1991.
. Agreement for Construction of a Potable and a Reclaimed
Water System for Salt Creek I, unit 3, dated April 15,
1991.
. Agreement for Construction of a Potable and a Reclaimed
Water System for East "H" Street from Eastlake Drive to
Route 175, dated February 21, 1991.
. Agreement for Construction of a Potable and a Reclaimed
Water System for East "H" Street from Route 125 to San
Miguel Road, dated February 21, 1991.
1
';11-/7
Assignee agrees that prior to accepting the facilities and
improvements set forth above, it will obtain the acceptance of
otay Water District for said improvements.
Assignee's acceptance of this Assignment and Agreement to
assume and comply with the terms and conditions of the above-
referenced Agreement is contingent upon the formation of the
Assessment District, the levy of assessments and the issuance of
bonds for purposes of financing the authorized improvement,
including utility facilities.
That any refund provisions and entitlements, as set forth in
the above Agreement, shall be made and distributed as follows:
All refunds shall be returned to the Assignor, and no
refundable amount shall be assessed to the property owners within
the boundaries of the Assessment District.
The undersigned Assignor is the owner of the above-
referenced Agreement and has the authority to execute this
Assignment.
Dated: -' a-I \ -~I
F. N. PROJECTS, INC.
Assignor
By:~~b~~
\l":-J.:. v? . I .L
Title: v'- "~-
Accepted on:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Assignee
By:
Title:
Accepted on:
/()-/(p- 9/
OTAY WATER DISTRICT
By, A~:tudt!1::tr
T1tle: ~
2
:J.I-/ r
ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 22nd day of October,
between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a public agency of the State
(hereinafter referred to as "City"), and F. N. PROJECTS, INC.,
corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Property Owner").
1991, by and
of California
a California
WHEREAS, the City has inidiated proceedings for the formation of a special assess-
ment district under the terms and conditions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califor-
nia, for the construction of certain public improvements, together with appurte-
nances and appurtenant work within the jurisdictional limits of said City and the
County of San Diego, said special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I), (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District"); and,
t
WHEREAS, Section 66462 of the Government Code of the State of California ("Subdivi-
sion Map Act") expressly authorizes financing and completion of public improvements
under an appropriate special assessment act, and Section 10102 of the Streets and
Highways Code ("Municipal Improvement Act of 1913") expressly authorizes the acquisi-
tion of any improvements authorized to be constructed under said law; and,
WHEREAS, Property Owner, in order to proceed in a timely way with its development,
desires to construct and/or has constructed certain public worke of improvement that
are proposed to be included with the works of improvement for the Assessment
Distr let, namely, the improvements as sf!t forth and described in the attached,
referenced and incorporated Exhibit "A"; and,
WHEREAS, the City and Property Owner are in agreement that the determined eligible
works of improvement may be included within the Assessment District financing at
prices determined by the City to be reasonable; and,
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this Agreement to provide that Property Owner shall,
upon a successful confirmation of assessment and sale of bonds for the Assessment
Distr ict, be paid for completed portions of the works of improvement which are
integral and a part of the Assessment District, at the prices as determined by the
City; and,
WHEREAS, the properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District will be
assessed only for those major portions of the works of improvement that benefit the
properties within the boundaries of the Assessment District, and this Acquisition/
Financing Agreement and payment for the works of improvement will apply to and only
cover those portions of said works of improvement; and,
WHEREAS, in performing under this Agreement, it is mutually understood that Property
Owner is acting as an independent contractor and not an agent of the City, and City
shall have no responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or
supplier of the Property Owner; and,
.2 /1:1,
WHEREAS, Property Owner shall be the owner of and retain title to all of the works
of improvement constructed pursuant to this Agreement until such time as the City,
acting pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913, shall
acquire such works of improvement. Upon such transfer, such improvements shall
become the property of the public agency and/or regulated utility authorized to
provide the service to the Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, the City has no objection to purchasing the improvements from said Property
Owner, and Property OWner is desirous that the City purchase said improvements, and
at this time said improvements are owned by Property Owner; and,
WHEREAS, City may, at its option, terminate this Agreement at any time if any legal
challenge is filed relating to the validity or enforceability of this Agreement for
these assessment district proceedings.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED between the respective parties as follows:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
SECTION 5.
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
The City has no financial obligation to construct the improvements, and
all expense for said improvements, including all incidentals thereto,
shall be borne by owners of property within the Assessment District.
That the City agrees to acquire and finance through the use of special
assessment proceedings, and Property Owner agrees to convey all
completed improvements to the City, those improvements being all as set
forth in the previously referenced Exhibit ItAII. Property Owner agrees
to post with the City the required bonds to guarantee the performance
of the work and payment of all labor and materials, said bonds to be in
the amounts as determined by the City.
Property Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance and shall
maintain said improvements in a satisfactory condition prior to any
final transfer and acceptance.
No acquisition monies shall be paid until the described improvements
to be acquired have been transferred free and clear of all liens,
claims and encumbrances, and Property OWner does hereby indemnify the
City against any liens, claims or encumbrances relating to said
acquired improvements that are not placed on such improvements by the
City.
The final facilities and actual prices to be paid for said improvements
are those that the City believes to be integral and reasonable and to
confer special benefit on properties within the Assessment District.
The estimated prices for the improvements are set forth in the
attached, referenced and incorporated Exhibit ItB". Final prices shall
be based upon unit prices and quantities as determined by the City to
be reasonable; HOWEVER, NOT TO EXCEED TOTAL AMOUNT OF $5.2 MILLION, and
no other costs and expenses shall be allowed unless expressly autho-
rized by the legislative bod:( of the City. The Property OWner shall
.2.. ~ --.2 ()
provide all reasonable substantiating documentation and certifications
of authenticity as requested by the City in the determination of either
the quantities of work constructed or the prices paid for such improve-
ments. Upon submission of such documentation by Property OWner, the
City agrees to diligently review and approve the quantities of work and
prices paid for such improvements in a timely fashion.
SECTION 6.
The estimated quantities set forth in the previously referenced Exhibit
"8" shall be revised to reflect the actual quantities of works of
improvement actually constructed at prices as determined by the City.
Any final determination shall be made by the City as to the prices and
quantities to be paid subject to the above modifications set forth.
SECTION 7.
The costs of acquisition shall also include the necessary engineering
and related incidental expenses, including, but not limited to, the
preparation of plans, specifications, bidding and all related documenta-
tion. Said final costs and expenses are to be determined upon the
completion of the works of improvement and certified by the City.
SECTION 8.
The cost for said works of
with the benefits received,
for the Assessment District.
improvement shall be spread in accordance
as determined by the Assessment Engineer
SECTION 9. All plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Property OWner,
and all improvements shall be bid and constructed in full compliance
with all applicable local rules and laws. Property OWner agrees to
keep records and to allow the City to review. said records for all bids
and contracts let for any of the improvements. City shall have the
right to inspect all works of improvement.
SECTION 10. Upon execution of this Agreement and completion of the improvements,
the City, upon payment for the acquisition of such improvements, shall
have the right to use said improvements as determined necessary and
integral for the works of improvement within the Assessment District.
SECTION 11. The acquisition monies, upon the sale of bonds, shall be distributed
pursuant to written instructions executed by all persons having an
interest in the property, as disclosed by a current title report.
"Interested parties" shall consist of property owners as shown on the
last equalized assessment roll for property taxes, as well as any
beneficiaries under any existing deeds of trust. No cash distribution
shall be made until all parties have executed the appropriate written
instructions.
SECTION 12. Except for reimbursements to Property OWner under the Reimbursement
Agreement, acquisition monies may be withheld until all improvements
required to be installed by the Property Owner have been completed, and
a reasonable amount of monies due under this Agreement may be subse-
quently withheld to cover final possible corrections and/or adjustments
in the work, said work to be accomplished subsequent to the confirma-
tion of the assessment and sale of bonds.
),.)....; J
SECTION 13. This Agreement is contingent upon the confirmation of assessments and
successful sale of bonds, and it shall be null and void if said bonds
are not sold within a three (3) year period following the date of this
Agreement, or any mutually agreed extension; however, this time can be
extended by request of the Property Owner and concurrence of the
legislative body.
SECTION 14. Property Owner hereby agrees to provide written notice to any potential
purchasers of lots in a form satisfactory to City so advising the
potential owner of the fact of the proposed or confirmed Assessment
District, with said document being executed by the potential owner.
Such notice shall be provided to the potential owner a reasonable time
before the potential owner becomes contractually committed to purchase
the lot so that the potential owner may knowingly consider the impact
of the assessment in the decision to purchase the lot. A copy of all
such notices executed by actual purchasers shall be sent to the City.
SECTION 15. Property Owner agrees to and shall assume the defense of, indemnify and
hold harmless the City, its officers and agents, from any action,
damages, claims or losses of any type resulting from this Agreement,
including without limitation the design, engineering, construction
bidding, award of the construction contract and construction of the
improvements. No provision as contained herein shall in any way limit
the extent of the responsibility of the Property Owner for payment of
damages resulting from the construction of the improvements and/or any
contractual relationships between Property Owner and contractor and/or
subcontractors.
SECTION 16. Property Owner agrees to cooperate with the City in the preparation of
the Official Statement for the sale of the Assessment District bonds.
Property Owner agrees to provide written disclosure about itself and
its development plans in the Salt Creek I Project for insertion in the
Official Statement. Property Owner also agrees to execute the
Developer's Certificate substantially in the form of Exhibit "C"
attached hereto in connection with such disclosure in the Official
Statement.
SECTION 17. This Agreement is binding upon heirs, assigns, and successors-in-
interest.
SECTION lB. Except for the Reimbursement Agreement, this Agreement, by its execu-
tion, amends and Bupercedes any terms and conditions that may be
inconsistent in any previous agreement, including any subdivision
improvement agreement, relating to the construction, installation or
financing of said improvements.
SECTION 19. The prevailing party in any litigation relating to, interpreting or
enforcing this Agreement, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's
fees as determined by the Court.
SECTION 20.
This Agreement and the construction
subject to all local laws and ordinances
improvement agreements, land division,
applicable development requirements.
of the improvements shall be
relating to the requirement of
improvement security or other
4
e1 /~.2.2..
SECTION 21. Property Owner agrees to pay origination charges pursuant to Council
policy.
EXECUTED by and between the parties hereto on the day and year first hereinabove
written.
"CITY"
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MAYOR
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CAIFORNIA
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
CITY ATTORNEY
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
"PROPERTY OWNER"
F. N. PROJECTS, INC.
BY'~. O-i-~ A ~. .t L ~
I~"~ P""A:~
5 :J.. J -,,23. / .J../- :1.1
Exhibit 'C'
DEVELOPER'S CERTIFICATE
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 92010
The F.N. Projects, Inc. ('Developer') the owner of certain lands described in the Official Statement
dated . 1991 ('Official Statement') providing for the issuance of S principal
amount of City of Chula Vista Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds, District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
(the 'Bonds'), to be secured by assessment liens imposed upon lands located within the boundaries of
Assessment District No. 90-1 (the 'District'), hereby certifies as follows:
1. Any and all information submitted by the Developer to the City of Chula Vista in connection
with the preparation of the Preliminary Official Statement, and the Official Statement was, to the best of
Developer's knowledge, true and correct.
2. The statements relating to the Developer, its proposed developments, its property ownership
and its contractual arrangements, if any, contained in the Official Statement under the caption "'The
Development' do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required
to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein, in light of the circumstances under which
they were made, not misleading. The representation in this participation is based on Developer's inquiry to
Claudia Troissi and Elizabeth Long, who are the representatives for the Developer who have responsibility
for knowing the information necessary in order to make this representation.
3. No proceedings are pending or threatened in which the Developer may be adjudicated as
bankrupt or discharged from any or all of its debts or obligations or granted an extension of time to pay its
debts or a reorganization or readjustment of its debts.
4. No action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation, at law or in equity, before or by any
court, regulatory agency, public board or body, is pending or, to its knowledge, threatened in any way seeking
to restrain or to enjoin the development of its property.
5. None of the property within the District is delinquent in the payment of any taxes or
assessments.
F.N. PROJECI'S, INC., a California corporation
"~,j:rI- ~7i- .
By:L/UA// e44 .
C:\DMS\DJO.DIR\9012529.WP
,).J " .2f'
AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT
THIS AGREEMENT AND ASSIGNMENT is by and between THE BALDWIN COMPANY ("Assignor"),
the CITY OF CHULA VISTA ("Assignee") and PACIFIC BELL ("Utility").
WHEREAS, Assignee has initiated proceedings pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for financing the acquisition and/or construction of certain public
improvements, including utility facilities, in an assessment district known and
designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to
as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, Assignor and Assignee have entered into an Acquisition/Financing Agreement
("Acquisition/Financing Agreement") approved by the legislative body of Assignee,
whereby Assignor has agreed to construct or install certain public improvements,
including utility facilities in the Assessment District and Assignee has agreed to
reimburse Assignor for the costs of such utility facilities pursuant to the terms
and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement from the proceeds of bonds
issued pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915"; and,
WHEREAS, Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California
specifically provides that before the ordering of any work and/or acquisition where
facilities or improvements will be owned, managed or controlled by any other public
agency or utility, the legislative body of Assignee shall enter into an agreement
with said public agency or utility which will have the ownership, management and
control for said facilities; and,
WHEREAS, the parties hereto enter into this Agreement for acquisition of the utility
facilities, their conveyance and provisions regarding any applicable refundings
pursuant to the provisions of Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby mutually agreed between the parties as follows:
SECTION 1. Except as provided in Section 2 hereinbelow, the undersigned does agree
and assign to Assignee, all of the undersigned's obligations, rights,
title and interest in and to the contracts (collective, the "Contracts")
identified as follows:
Agreement for Underground Telephone Service Facilities for Salt Creek
I, Job No. D3(17)16S1Q.
SECTION 2. Assignor shall retain any and all right to any refunds or payments from
Utility as provided for under the terms and conditions of the Contracts.
No refundable amount shall be assessed to the property owners within the
boundaries of the Assessment District.
Assignee's acceptance of these assignments is contingent upon the
successful formation of the Assessment District, and this Agreement and
Assignment shall become effective after proceedings have been taken and
funds are available as necessary to carry out the terms thereof, and
this Agreement and Assignment has been entered into before the ordering
by Assignee of the work and/or acquisition for this Assessment District.
~/-.l/,
SECTION 3. Assignor and Assignee agree that Assignor'. right to the reimbursement
for the costs of construction and installation of the utility facilities
subject to this Agreement and Assignment shall be governed by the terms
and conditions of the Acquisition/Financing Agreement.
DATED:
rfJ./ot,P/I r, r?9/
::: ];2"'; 1J~
Title: VIC€, ~/l?eVr
The undersigned, the Assignee above referred to, hereby accepts this Assignment
subject to all its terms and conditions.
f
DATED:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
T it Ie:
We consent to the foregoing Assignment, without such consent being a novation.
DATED:
6...<--P'~/~I''i''\
PACIFIC BELL
By:
I~-b .
/J1,,:;. AJ /1e; 6/l.-
./"'
""
Title:
.2/-.2 ?
CONSENT AND WAIVER
AGENCY:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WHEREAS, the above Agency has initiated proceedings and scheduled a public hearing
under the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, for the construction of
certain public improvements to benefit properties within the boundaries of a special
assessment district, said assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I), (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"; and,
WHEREAS, at this time certain changes and modifications are proposed to be made to
the assessment of property owned by the undersigned property owner(s); and,
WHEREAS, the undersigned property owner(s) acknowledges that pursuant to the provi-
sions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", property owner would be entitled to
additional notice of the proposed increase in the assessment against the property.
The undersigned, however, acknowledges that he is aware of the proposed increase in
the assessment against the property and waives any and all right which he may now
have to further notice pertaining to the proposed increase in the assessment against
the property and any and all right which he may have to protest the modification to
the proposed improvements resulting in said increased assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby declared by the undersigned property owner(s) as
follows:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That the undersigned property owner (s) hereby consents to the proposed
modification and amendment to the assessments as hereinafter set forth:
ASSESSMENT
NUMBER
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
ORIGINAL
ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED
MODIFICATION
175B
595-030-20
$ 782,084.20
$1,020,411.30
REASON FOR PROPOSED MODIFICATION:
based upon number of building units
other assessments shall be reduced.
To better reflect benefits received
as proposed for the development. All
SECTION 3. That property owner(s) hereby acknowledges the above proposed changes and
modif ications and requests the Agency to proceed at this time to order
said changes and modifications.
SECTION 4. The undersigned hereby certify under penalty of perjury that they are the
property owner(s) of record of the parcel and property as described and
set forth above.
DATED: --1 0 - I 'r"" - 'U
j:".,.;. f'~,~.
~ .-.1... M..-t--
R~PERTY OWN;R I !.fl/~ ~
r
.2. J - :L 8'"
CERTIFICATION OF ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
The undersigned, as Assessment Engineer, does hereby CERTIFY that I have reviewed the
CONSENT AND WAIVER form, and that the persons signing the document are the owners of
the property as shown on the records of the County Assessor or as shown by documenta-
tion, copies of which are attached hereto.
EXECUTED this
day of
, 1991, at Chula Vista, California.
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES
By:
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
~ I--.J.. 't / )./-30
RESOLUTION NO. /l, ~ it>
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT" IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Divi-
sion 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
for the installation of certain works of improvement in a special
assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and
WHEREAS, baaed upon the presentation and recommendations of
staff and available documentation, it now appears that the changes
and modifications as set forth in the amended assessment roll, as
presented herein, should be approved and ordered to be done.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That all changes and modifications as set forth in the
final Engineer's "Report", as submitted, are hereby ordered pursuant
to the authority as set forth in Section 10352 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California (the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913").
3. That the decisions and determinations of this legislative
body ordering the above-referenced changes and modifications shall
be final and conclusive upon all persons entitled to appeal thereon.
4. That the Engineer's "Report", the Assessment Roll, and all
related documentation, as herein modified, are for the beat interest
of the property owners within the Assessment District, and the
assessment, as modified and apportioned, is in accordance with the
benefits received, and said modified "Report" shall stand as the
Engineer' B "Report Of for all subsequent proceedings relating to this
Assessment District.
J
Presented by
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
/
,
1-'
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
as to form
~/,,3/
\
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
by the City Council of the City
day of
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California i do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
held on the day of , 1991.
Executed this _____ day of
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
~\, 3'1-
RESOLUTION NO. Ii, ; 1'/
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
APPROVING AGREEMENTS
(SALT CREEK I)
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 9D-1
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, is considering the formation of a special assessment
district under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improve-
ment Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, for the installation of certain
public works of improvement in a special assessment district, said
assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and,
WHEREAS, the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, specifically the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913",
expressly allows the acquisition of any improvements that are autho-
rized to be installed under said law, and the property owner, in
order to proceed in a timely way with his development, desires to
install and/or cause the installation of certain of the works of
improvement, with said improvements to be subsequently acquired and
financed under these proceedings for this Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, at this time there has been submitted to
Council for review and approval, an Acquisition/Financing
setting forth certain terms and conditions, as well as
prices and quantities of work to be installed and financed;
this City
Agreement
estimated
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, it is required that prior to the
time that any works of improvement are ordered pursuant to said
proceedings, the legislative body may authorize the financing of
facilities that shall be owned by other public agencies and/or
regulated public utilities, who will have legal title to the
facilities, as well as subsequent responsibilities for management
and maintenance; and,
WHEREAS,
be made pr ior
the assessment
it is further provided
to the adoption of the
proceedings; and,
that any such agreement
Resolution Ordering Work
shall
under
WHEREAS, at this time, contracts
submitted pursuant to the authorization
Streets and Highways Code.
have been
of Sect ion
reviewed and
10110 of said
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
,21. !13
SECTION 2. That the Acquisition/Financing Agreement, as
submitted for the referenced Assessment District, is hereby
approved, and execution is authorized to be made by the Mayor and
City Clerk.
SECTION 3. That a copy of said Agreement shall be kept on file
in the City Clerk and remain for public inspection.
SECTION 4. The final prices to be paid for said improvements
shall be prices as determined by the City to be reasonable, to
represent the actual costs and expenses for the installed works of
improvement, including all appropriate incidental expenses.
SECTION 5. That the agreements and assignments, herewith
submitted, relating to the installation of certain improvement
facilities that will be under the ownership, management and control
of other public agencies or regulated public utilities, are hereby
submitted and herewith approved. The following listed agreements
are hereby authorized for execution on behalf of the City. Said
Agreements relate to facilities to be owned by the following listed
public agencies or regulated public utilities:
A. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
B. Pacific Bell
C. Otay Water District
SECTION 6. That immediately upon execution, conformed coples
of said agreements and assignments shall be transmitted to the
offices of the respective public agency or utility company, together
with a copy of this Resolution.
Presented by
Bruce M. Boogsard
City Attorney
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
by the City Council
day of
City
21 ~ 3~
/
RESOLUTION NO.
I L~t2.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE,
TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT" IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention and
initiated proceedings for the installation of certain public works
of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work,
including acquisition where appropriate, in a special assessment
district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, said special assessment
district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT
CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District");
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a "Report",
as therein provided, was presented, considered and approved; and,
WHEREAS, said
all the matters and
provisions of said
the following:
"Report", as preliminarily approved, contained
items called for by law and as pursuant to the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", including
1. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements;
2. Estimate of cost;
3. Diagram of Assessment District;
4. An assessment according to benefits;
S. A description of the works of improvement; and,
WHEREAS, all protests have been heard and considered, and a
full hearing has been given, all in the manner provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, notices of said hearing were duly and regularly
posted, mailed and published in the time, form and manner required
by law and as evidenced by affidavits on file with the transcript of
these proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, the owners of one-half (1/2) of the area assessed for
the cost of the project did not file written protests against the
said proposed improvements and acquisition where appropriate, and
this legislative body did, after providing a full hearing, overrule
and deny all protests and objections; and,
WHEREAS,
assessment and
and submitted.
this legislative body is
all matters contained in the
now satisfied with the
"Report" as now updated
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
,3$
.21~_
RECITALS
SECTION 1.
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
PROTESTS
SECTION 2. That all protests and objections of every kind and
nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and it is
further determined that said protests and objections are made by the
owners of less than one-half of the area of property to be assessed
for said improvements within said Assessment District.
BENEFITS RECEIVED
SECTION 3. That it is hereby determined that all properties
within the boundaries of the Assessment District receive a local and
direct benefit from the works of improvement as proposed for said
Assessment District, and it is hereby further determined and
declared that all assessable costs and expenses have been appor-
tioned and spread over the properties within the boundaries of the
Assessment District in direct proportion to the benefits received
thereby.
PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONVENIENCE
SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience require
the proposed improvements to be made, and therefore it is hereby
ordered that the work to be done and improvements to be made,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection there-
wi th, including acquisition where appropriate, in said Assessment
District, as set forth in the Resolution of Intention previously
adopted and as set forth in the "Report" presented and considered,
and as now submitted.
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT
SECTION 5. That the "Report", as now updated and submitted,
consisting of the assessment and diagram for the improvements,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection there-
with, including acquisition where appropriate, is hereby confirmed.
The assessments contained in the final Engineer' S
"Report" are hereby levied and approved as follows:
A. The final assessments to represent the costs
and expenses to finance the publ ic works of improvement, as autho-
rized for these proceedings.
B. The annual assessment to pay for administrative
costs in an amount not to exceed the maximum annual assessment as
set forth in said "Report II .
.3"
21~"
./
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly
California,
was
held on the
A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
day of , 1991.
Executed this _____ day of
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
2,/. ~(
;< / - 31:,
RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall forthwith deliver to the
Superintendent of Streets the said assessment, together with the
diagram attached thereto and made a part thereof, as confirmed, with
his certificate of such confirmation attached and the date thereof;
and that said Superintendent of Streets shall then immediately
record said diagram and assessment in his Office in a suitable book
to be kept for that purpose and attach thereto his certificate of
the date of such recording.
COUNTY RECORDER NOTICE
SECTION 7. Upon confirmation of the assessments and recorda-
tion of the assessment roll and diagram, a certified copy of the
assessment diagram shall be immediately filed in the Office of the
County Recorder. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the notice of
assessment shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in
the manner and form as set forth by law and specifically Section
3114 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
MAILED NOTICE
SECTION 8. That said City Clerk, upon the recording of said
diagram and assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property
within the Assessment District at his last known address, as the
same appears on the tax rolls of the County or on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, or to both addresses if said address is not the
same, or to General Delivery when no address so appears, a statement
containing a designation by street number or other description of
the property assessed sufficient to enable the owner to identify the
same, the amount of the assessment, the time and place of payment
thereof, the effect of failure to pay within such time, and a state-
ment of the fact that bonds will be issued on unpaid assessments
pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915".
PUBLICATION
SECTION 9. That said City Clerk shall also give notice by
publishing a copy of a notice of recording of assessment in the
newspaper previously selected to publish all notices as provided by
law, giving notice that said assessment has been recorded in the
Office of the Superintendent of Streets, and that all sums assessed
thereon are due and payable immediately, and that the payment of
said sums is to be made within thirty (30) days after the date of
recording the assessment, which date shall be so stated in sald
notice, and of the fact that securities will be issued upon unpaid
assessments.
ASSESSMENT COLLECTION
SECTION 10. The County Auditor is hereby authorized and
directed, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8682 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to enter into
31
21-_
his assessment roll on which property taxes will next become due,
opposite each lot or parcel of land affected, in a space marked
"public improvement assessment" or by other suitable designation,
the next and several installments of such assessment coming due
during the ensuing fiscal year covered by the assessment roll and
that said entry then shall be made each year during the life of the
bonds for the proceedings for the above-referenced Assessment
District. This authorization is continual until all assessment
obligations have been discharged and the bonds terminated.
As an alternate, and when determined to be in the
best interests for bondholders of the Assessment District, this
legislative body may, by Resolution, designate an official other
than the County Tax Collector and/or other agent, to collect and
maintain records of the collection of the assessments, including a
procedure other than the normal property tax collection procedure.
SECTION 11. In accordance with the provisions of Section 8685
of the Streets and Highways Code, if any lot or parcel of land
affected by any assessment is not separately assessed on the tax
roll so that the installment of the assessment to be collected can
be conveniently entered thereon, then the Auditor shall enter on the
roll a description of the lot or parcel affected, with the name of
the owners, if known, but otherwise the owners may be described as
"unknown owners", and extend the proper installment opposite the
same.
ASSESSMENT VERIFICATION STATEMENT
SECTION 12. The County Auditor shall, within 90 days after any
special assessment installment becomes delinquent, render and submit
a detailed report showing the amounts of the installments, interest,
penalties and percentages so collected, for the preceding term and
installment date, and from what property collected, and further
identify any properties which are delinquent and the amount and
length of time for said delinquency, and further set forth a state-
ment of percentages retained for the expenses of making such collec-
tions. This request is specifically made to the authorization of
Section 8683 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS
SECTION 13. The Treasurer is hereby authorized at this time,
if not previously done, to establish the following funds as neces-
sary for the payment of costs and expenses and administration of the
proceedings for this Assessment District:
A. IMPROVEMENT FUND: All monies received from
cash collection, proceeds from the sale of bonds and applicable
contributions shall be placed into the Improvement Fund.
assist
Reserve
B. RESERVE FUND: All monies as designated to
in the payment of delinquencies shall be placed into the
Fund.
JS
.il ' _
C. REDEMPTION FUND:
payment of assessments shall be placed
All monies received from
in the Redemption Fund.
the
For particulars as to the administration and
handl ing of the Funds, the spec if ic terms and conditions shall be
set forth in the Bond Indenture and approved through the Resolution
Authorizing the Issuance of Bonds.
Presented by
Approved as to form
fi
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
the City
day of
Council of the City
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmernberst
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
,.9
Z/~.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk' of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
held on the day of , 1991.
Executed this _____ day of
,
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
.j./- ~()
LAW OFFICES
BROWN. HARPER. BURNS iii HENTSCHKE
SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92130
NEWPORT BEACH (714) 551-1915
LOS ANGELES (2131 567-1915
F. MACKENZIE BROWN-
ALAN R. BURNS
JOHN ROBERT HARPER-
DANIEL S. HENT5CHKE
ROBERT E. HESSELL
12770 HIGH SLUFF DRIVE, SUITE 240
(619) 456.1915
F'AX 2S9~0292
Of COU"ISE:L
JOSEPH .J. HUGHES
MICHAEL 8. MONTGOME".RV-
'A PAO~ESS":mAL CORPO"AtlON
October 7, 1991
John Lippitt, City Engineer
City of Chula Vista
P. O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 92012
RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
Dear John:
Enclosed herein
Hearing scheduled
please find the following
for October 22, 1991:
items
in
connection with the
Pub lie
1. ORDER OF PROCEDURE.
2. RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS.
3. RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS.
* * *
The ORDER OF PROCEDURE should be helpful in the preparation of the Minutes for the
Public Hearing, and also sets forth the order in which the Public Hearing should be
conducted.
Please note that a copy of
descr ipt ion of the proposed
meeting, must be posted in a
least 72 hours before the time
the AGEND~ for this meeting, setting forth a general
actions to be taken and the time and place of the
location freely accessible to the general public at
set for said meeting.
DOCUMENTS
At the time of the public hearing, the following documentation should be on file in
the Office of the City Clerk:
1. Engineer's "Report", consisting of plans, specifications, cost estimate,
assessment roll, assessment diagram
2. Aquisition/Financing Agreement
3. Utility Contracts/Assignments
:)-1- Lf3
LAW OFFICES
BROWN. HARPER.. BURNS e HENTSCHK.E
John Lippitt, City Engineer
City of Chula Vista
October 7, 1991
Page Two
RESOLUTIONS
Through the adoption of the enclosed Resolutions, the following will generally be
accomplished:
The RESOLUTION APPROVING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENTS accepts the Acquisition/Financing
Agreement with the Property Owner and assignments with San Diego Gas & Electric,
Pacific Bell and the Otay Water District.
The RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS
improvements, confirming the assessments
"Report" .
is the formal
and approving
action ordering the
the f ioal Eng ineer' s
PUBLIC HEARING
Inasmuch as the hearing is a due process public hearing, the legislative body needs
to be informed and advised as to all communications received. As written
communications are filed relating to the proceedings, copies should be immediately
transmitted to the following:
A. Each member of the legislative body
B. Office of Project Manager
C. Office of Assessment Engineer
D. Off ice of Bond Counsel
Please note that prior to the public hearing any protests received should be calcu-
lated. The computation is made based upon the area of the land protesting (% of
assessable area). This figure should be available for presentation at the public
hearing.
ENGINEER'S "REPORT"
Prior to the public hearing you should have on file the final and updated "Report"
of the Engineer, indicating changes and modifications, as well as the final
recommended assessment amounts. Assessments can be reduced; however, no assess-
ments can be increased without further notice, etc. This office should be
contacted if it is proposed that any assessments are to be increased from that
contained in the previously approved Engineer's "Report".
UTILITY CONTRACT ASSIGNMENTS
The proceedings contemplate the funding of utility facilities, which will be owned
by a public utility or public agency other than the City. The statute requires
that those contracts be back on file and approved prior to the confirmation of the
assessments.
;). J - L/-Lf
LAW OFFICES
BROWN. HARPER. BURNS II HENTSCHKE
John Lippitt, City Engineer
City of Chula Vista
October 7, 1991
Page Three
ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT
The property owner will be installing
the Assessment District, and the
executed and back on file prior to the
certain of the facilities to be financed
Acquisition/Financing Agreement should
time set for the public hearing.
in
be
All Agreements will be approved through the Resolution transmitting approving
execution of Agreements.
NOTICE REQUIREMENTS
Please note that immediately following the public hearing, notice will again be
required by mailing, publication and recordation. Under separate cover I will be
transmitting all notices, affidavits and certificates necessary to comply with the
notice requirements.
CONFORMED COPIES
As in the past, when available, I would appreciate conformed copies of all of the
RESOLUTIONS.
Should you have any questions and/or comments concerning the above, please do not
hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
F. MACKENZIE BROWN
FMB:bd
encl.
cc: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Lombardo de Trinidad, City of Chula Vista
David Keltner; Muni Financial Services
Carl Kadie; Radle-Jensen, Johnson & Bodnar
Thomas Meade; Municipal Finance Admini.stration
:2)- '+5
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
OCTOBER 22, 1991
PUBLIC HEARING
FOR CONSIDERATION:
HEARING REQUIRED PURSUANT TO THE "MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT
ACT OF 1913".
MAYOR:
Announce that this is the time and place fixed for
public hearing on protests or objections to
Resolution of Intention, Engineer's "Report" and
other matters relating to ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
(SALT CREEK I).
the
the
all
90-1
CITY CLERK:
Announce that notice of the Public Hearing has been given
in the manner and form as required by law and that a
Certificate of Compliance is on file certifying that
notice was given in the following ways:
Posting all public streets within
Mailing notice to property owners
Filing proposed boundary map
Recorder
Publication of Notice of improvement
the District
within the District
in Office of County
STAFF:
Explain purpose for Public Hearing.
Describe extent of works of improvement and boundaries
of Assessment District.
Present and summarize "Report".
Explain method and formula of assessment spread.
Report on Acquisition/Financing Agreement.
Report on utility agreements/assignments.
END OF STAFF REPORT - OPEN FOR PUBLIC DISCUSSION
::l/-%
ORDER OF PROCEDURE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PAGE TWO
DATE OF PUBLIC HEARING:
OCTOBER 22, 1991
MAYOR:
ASK EACH SPEAKER TO IDENTIFY THEMSELVES AND THEIR PROPERTY.
First, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak against the
improvement, the Assessment District, or the method of spread.
Then, ask to hear from anyone who wishes to speak in favor of the
proceedings.
STAFF:
Report on final percentage of protests (% of area) received.
Presentation of any proposed changes or modifications to the
Engineer's "Report" and the Assessment District.
STAFF/COUNCIL: Discussion.
MAYOR: Declare Public Hearing CLOSED.
IF THE LEGISLATIVE BODY WISHES TO PROCEED:
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS:
riate changes and modifications to the proceedings
"Report" .
Orders approp-
and Eng loeer ' S
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION APPROVING AGREEMENTS: This Resolution accepts the
Acquisition/Financing Agreement and the assignments with San Diego
Gas & Electric, Pacific Bell and the Otay Water District.
CITY COUNCIL:
Adopt RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS: Formal action ordering the
improvements, confirming the assessments and approving the final
Engineer's "Report".
* * *
;)1-4-7
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ORDERING CERTAIN CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT" IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO, 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
has previously adopted its Resolution of' Intention pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Divi-
sion 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
for the installation of certain works of improvement in a special
assessment distr let known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
90 -1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and
WHEREAS, based upon the presentation and recommendations of
staff and available documentation, it now appears that the changes
and modif ications as Bet forth in the amended assessment roll, as
presented herein, should be approved and ordered to be done.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That all changes and modifications as set forth in the
final Engineer's "Report", as submitted, are hereby ordered pursuant
to the authority as set forth in Section 10352 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California (the "Municipal Improvement
Act of 1913").
3. That the decisions and determinations of this legislative
body ordering the above-referenced changes and modifications shall
be final and conclusive upon all persons entitled to appeal thereon.
4. That the Engineer's "Report", the Assessment Roll, and all
related documentation, as herein modified, are for the beat interest
of the property owners within the Assessment District, and the
assessment, as modified and apportioned, is in accordance with the
benefits received, and said modified "Report" shall stand as the
Engineer's "Report.. for all subsequent proceedings relating to this
Assessment District.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
;)(-if'i
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
by the City Council of the City
day of
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
held on the day of , 1991.
Executed this _____ day of
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
aJ-Ifi
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
APPROVING AGREEMENTS
(SALT CREEK I)
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, is considering the formation of a special assessment
district under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal Improve-
ment Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the state of California, for the installation of certain
public works of improvement in a special assessment district, said
assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO.
90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and,
WHEREAS, the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, specifically the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913" I
expressly allows the acquisition of any improvements that are autho-
rized to be installed under said law, and the property owner, in
order to proceed in a timely way with hie development, desires to
install and/or cause the installation of certain of the works of
improvement, with said improvements to be Bubsequently acquired and
financed under these proceedings for this Assessment District; and,
WHEREAS, at this time there has been submitted to this City
Council for review and approval, an Acquisition/Financing Agreement
setting forth certain terms and conditions, as well as estimated
prices and quantities of work to be installed and financed; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10110 of the Streets and Highways
Code of the State of California, it is required that prior to the
time that any works of improvement are ordered pursuant to said
proceedings, the legislative body may authorize the financing of
facilities that shall be owned by other public agencies and/or
regulated public utilities, who will have legal title to the
facilities, as well as subsequent responsibilities for management
and maintenance; and,
WHEREAS,
be made pr ior
the assessment
it is further provided that any such agreement shall
to the adoption of the Resolution Ordering Work under
proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, at this time, contracts
submitted pursuant to the authorization
Streets and Highways Code.
have been
of Section
rev iewed and
lalla of said
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
;;2.f--50
SECTION 2. That the Acquisition/Financing Agreement, as
submitted for the referenced Assessment District, is hereby
approved, and execution is authorized to be made by the Mayor and
City Clerk.
SECTION 3. That a copy of said Agreement shall be kept on file
in the city Clerk and remain for public inspection.
SECTION 4. The final prices to be paid for said improvements
shall be prices as determined by the City to be reasonable, to
represent the actual coste and expenses for the installed works of
improvement, including all appropriate incidental expenses.
SECTION 5. That the agreements and assignments, herewith
submitted, relating to the installation of certain improvement
facilities that will be under the ownership, management and control
of other public agencies or regulated public utilities, are hereby
submitted and herewith approved. The following listed agreements
are hereby authorized for execution on behalf of the City. Said
Agreements relate to facilities to be owned by the following listed
public agencies or regulated public utilities:
A. San Diego Gas & Electric Co.
B. Pacific Bell
C. Otay Water District
SECTION 6. That immediately upon execution, conformed copies
of said agreements and assignments shall be transmitted to the
offices of the respective public agency or utility company, together
with a copy of this Resolution.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
by the City Council of the City
day of
;;JI-6(
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly
California,
was
held on the
A. Authelet, City Clerk of the city of Chula Vista,
do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
day of . 1991.
Executed this _____ day of
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
;2/-52.
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT, ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS MADE,
TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S
"REPORT" IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, t he CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention and
initiated proceedings for the installation of certain public works
of improvement, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work,
including acquisition where appropriate, in a special assessment
district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913" I being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, Baid special assessment
district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT
CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District");
and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a "Report",
as therein provided, was presented, considered and approved; and,
WHEREAS, said
all the matters and
provisions of said
the following:
"Report", as preliminarily approved, contained
items called for by law and as pursuant to the
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", including
1. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements;
2. Estimate of cost;
3. Diagram of Assessment District;
4. An assessment according to benefits;
5. A description of the works of improvement; and,
WHEREAS, all protests have been heard and considered, and a
full hearing has been given, all in the manner provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, notices of said hearing were duly and regularly
posted, mailed and published in the time, form and manner required
by law and as evidenced by affidavits on file with the transcript of
these proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, the owners of one-half (1/2) of the area assessed for
the coat of the project did not file written protests against the
said proposed improvements and acquisition where appropriate, and
this legislative body did, after providing a full hearing, overrule
and deny all protests and objections; and,
WHEREAS,
assessment and
and submitted.
this legislative body is
all matters contained in the
now satisfied with the
"Report" as now updated
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
~-53
RECITALS
SECTION 1.
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
PROTESTS
SECTION 2. That all protests and objections of every kind and
nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and it is
further determined that said protests and objections are made by the
owners of less than one-half of the area of property to be assessed
for said improvements within said Assessment District.
BENEFITS RECEIVED
SECTION 3. That it is hereby determined that all properties
within the boundaries of the Assessment District receive a local and
direct benefit from the works of improvement as proposed for said
Assessment District, and it is hereby further determined and
declared that all assessable costs and expenses have been appor-
tioned and spread over the properties within the boundaries of the
Assessment District in direct proportion to the benefits received
thereby.
PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONVENIENCE
SECTION 4. That the public interest and convenience require
the proposed improvements to be made, and therefore it is hereby
ordered that the work to be done and improvements to be made,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection there-
wi th, including acquisition where appropriate, in said Assessment
District, as set forth in the Resolution of Intention previously
adopted and as set forth in the "Report" presented and considered,
and as now submitted.
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT
SECTION 5. That the "Report", as now updated and submitted,
consisting of the assessment and diagram for the improvements,
together with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection there-
with, including acquisition where appropriate, is hereby confirmed.
The assessments contained in the final Engineer's
"Report" are hereby levied and approved as follows:
A. The final assessments to represent the costs
and expenses to finance the publ ic works of improvement, as autho-
rized for these proceedings.
B. The annual assessment to pay for administrative
costs in an amount not to exceed the maximum annual assessment as
set forth in said "Report".
62/-9{-
._~
RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT
SECTION 6. That the City Clerk shall forthwith deliver to the
Superintendent of Streets the said assessment, together with the
diagram attached thereto and made a part thereof, as confirmed, with
his certificate of Buch confirmation attached and the date thereof;
and that said Super intendant of Streets shall then immediately
record said diagram and assessment in hie Office in a suitable book
to be kept for that purpose and attach thereto his certificate of
the date of Buch recording.
COUNTY RECORDER NOTICE
SECTION 7. Upon confirmation of the assessments and recorda-
tion of the assessment roll and diagram, a certif ied copy of the
assessment diagram shall be immediately filed in the Office of the
County Recorder. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the notice of
assessment shall be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder in
the manner and form as set forth by law and specifically Section
3114 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
MAILED NOTICE
SECTION 8. That said City Clerk, upon the recording of said
diagram and assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property
within the Assessment District at his last known address, as the
same appears on the tax rolls of the County or on file in the Office
of the City Clerk, or to both addresses if said address is not the
same, or to General Delivery when no address so appears, a statement
containing a designation by street number or other description of
the property assessed sufficient to enable the owner to identify the
same, the amount of the assessment, the time and place of payment
thereof, the effect of failure to pay within such time, and a state-
ment of the fact that bonds will be issued on unpaid assessments
pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915".
PUBLICATION
SECTION 9. That said City Clerk shall also give notice by
publ ishing a copy of a notice of recording of assessment in the
newspaper previously selected to publish all notices as provided by
law, giving notice that said assessment has been recorded in the
Office of the Superintendent of Streets, and that all sums assessed
thereon are due and payable immediately, and that the payment of
said sums is to be made within thirty (30) days after the date of
recording the assessment, which date shall be so stated in said
notice, and of the fact that securities will be issued upon unpaid
assessments.
ASSESSMENT COLLECTION
SECTION 10. The County Auditor is hereby authorized and
directed, in accordance with the provisions of Section 8682 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to enter into
Jl1-55
his assessment roll on which property taxes will next become due,
opposite each lot or parcel of land affected, in a space marked
"public improvement assessment" or by other suitable designation,
the next and several installments of such assessment coming due
during the ensuing fiscal year covered by the assessment roll and
that said entry then shall be made each year during the life of the
bonds for the proceedings for the above-referenced Assessment
District. This authorization is continual until all assessment
obligations have been discharged and the bonds terminated.
As an alternate, and when determined to be in the
best interests for bondholders of the Assessment District, this
legislative body may, by Resolution, designate an official other
than the County Tax Collector and/or other agent, to collect and
maintain records of the collection of the assessments, including a
procedure other than the normal property tax collection procedure.
SECTION 11. In accordance with the provisions of Section 8685
of the Streets and Highways Code, if any lot or parcel of land
affected by any assessment is not separately assessed on the tax
roll so that the installment of the assessment to be collected can
be conveniently entered thereon, then the Auditor shall enter on the
roll a description of the lot or parcel affected, with the name of
the owners, if known, but otherwise the owners may be described as
"unknown owners", and extend the proper installment opposite the
same.
ASSESSMENT VERIFICATION STATEMENT
SECTION 12. The County Auditor shall, within 90 days after any
special assessment installment becomes delinquent, render and submit
a detailed report showing the amounts of the installments, interest,
penalties and percentages so collected, for the preceding term and
installment date, and from what property collected, and further
identify any properties which are delinquent and the amount and
length of time for said delinquency, and further set forth a state-
ment of percentages retained for the expenses of making such collec-
tions. This request is specifically made to the authorization of
Section 8683 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS
SECTION 13. The Treasurer is hereby authorized at this time,
if not previously done, to establish the following funds as neces-
sary for the payment of costs and expenses and administration of the
proceedings for this Assessment District:
A. IMPROVEMENT FUND: All monies received from
cash collection, proceeds from the sale of bonds and applicable
contributions shall be placed into the Improvement Fund.
B. RESERVE FUND: All monies as designated to
assist in the payment of delinquencies shall be placed into the
Reserve Fund.
621-5~
-- .t
C. REDEMPTION FUND: All monies received from the
payment of assessments shall be placed in the Redemption Fund.
For particulars ae to the administration and
handling of the Funds, the specific terms and conditions shall be
set forth in the Bond Indenture and approved through the Resolution
Authorizing the Issuance of Bonds.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1991, by the following vote:
by the City Council of the City
day of
AYES: Counci1members:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Counci1members:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
2/-57
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
Ca 1 i fornia, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
held on the day of , 1991.
Executed this
day of
, 1991.
Beverly A. Authelet, city Clerk
J2/=-58
..
,--
, \
FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
-,
OCTOBER 1991
PREPARED BY
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
42217 Rio Nedo, Second Floor
Temecula, CA 92590
(714) 699-3990
FAX: (714) 699-3460
3727 Buchanan, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94123
(415) 441-3550
FAX: (415) 441-1401
;21-59
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY .......................................... 1
ENGINEER'S REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
PART I - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ......................... 4
PART II - ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
PART III - ASSESSMENT ROLL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
METHOD/FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
PART IV - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ............................ 19
PART V - DESCRIPTION OF WORK ............................ 20
RESOLUTION OF PROCEEDINGS ................................. 23
APPENDIX . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24
~/- Go
-
.<
-
.
PRO~ECT SUMMARY
Acquisition Agreement
Adopt Boundary Map
Resolution of Intention
Presentation of Confirmed
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing
Confirmation of Assessments
.12m
October , 1991
September 17, 1991
September 17, 1991
October , 1991
October . 1991
October . 1991
The Assessment District is proposed for the purpose of acquiring certain public
Improvements under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The General administration
of this District will be undertaken by the City of Chula Vista and all official actions will be
made by the City Council.
The Baldwin Company has previously submitted a tentative subdivision.map known
as Salt Creek I, Chula Vista Tract 89-09 for 130 acres located at the northeasterly and
southeasterly quadrants of East "H" Street and the proposed State Route 125.
A Final Environmental Impact Report for the development, ErR 89-9, has been
processed and approved by the City Council. Additionally, the City Council has approved
the tentative subdivision map for Salt Creek I, Chula Vista Tract 89-9 for which Maps
12827, 12828 and 12829 have subsequently recorded.
Salt Creek I is included within the Development Impact Fee, Eastem Territory, 1991,
which directs that specific infrastructure be provided to mitigate area deficiencies. Those
specific facilities built by Salt Creek I shall be noted within this report and identified with
Section "C" of the Cost Estimate Section. The DIF, as set by the DIF Report per
Residential Category, shall be incorporated and additive to the final assessment district
/ien. For this district, the DIF Facilities to be Incorporated are those directly related to the
grading, street improvement and landscaping of El(I.st "H" Street from East Lake Drive to
Mt. Miguel.
The cost of the acquisition of these improvements and incidentals and the DIF is
assigned to every parcel of land within the District that has received an Improvement or
has benefitted by the improvement. The level of benefit varies according to land use and
utilization of the improvements funded.
.
Prellm.lnary
$ 4,196,476.86
< 388,024.21 >
$ 665,448.42
$ 916.341.15
$ 5,390,424.22
Confirmed
$4,251,556.86
< 615,955.89>
$ 670,562.38
$ 820.221.59
$ 5,126,384.94
Acquisition Construction Cost
Lass Developer Contribution
Incidental Expenses
Costs of Issuance
Balance to Assessment
Additional Information may be obtained by contacting the office of the Public Works
Director, John P. Uppitt.
1
Ipf
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 10204 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being
Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in
accordance with the Resolution of Intention No. 16343, adopted by the City Council of the
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(hereinafter referred to as the "CITY"), in connection with the proceedings for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
SALT CREEK I
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment Districtj, I, John P. Uppitt submit
herewith the Report for the Assessment District, consisting of five (5) parts as follows:
PART I
Plans and specificetions for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
PART II
The actual cost of the improvements to be acquired, including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2
b~
~MFS
PART III
A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the
Improvements upon the several subdMsions of land within the assessment district, in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, from said
Improvements, Is presented upon the assessment roll filed as a part of this report.
PART IV
A Diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries of the subdMslon
of land within said assessment district, as the legal parcels existed at the time of the
passage of the Resolution of Intention, Is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
PART V
Description of the work for the improvements are filed herewith and made a part
hereof. Description of all rights-of-way, easements and lands to be acquired,lf necessary,
Is set forth on the lists thereof and are on file In the Office of the City Clerk.
This Preliminary Report dated this /7 day of S~. ,1991.
~ I ~~,.~
I John P. pp.
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
This Final Report dated this _ day of
,1991.
John P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
3
@
193
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90.1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART I - PLANS AND SPEC/FICAT10NS
Plans and Specifications for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
.
4
6if
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART /I - E5nMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS
SECTION A.
ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS
PROJECT NO.1: PROJECT GRADING
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125 (SR 125)
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.7: OFFSITE SEWER - PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
SECTION B.
CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM DIF
SECTION C.
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
BOND COSTS
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT
5
(PG
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 1: GRADING
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED DIF
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
1 EAST "H" STREET 273,628.00 273,628.00 273,628.00
2 PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 254,230.00 254,230.00 0.00
3 MT. MIGUEL ROAD 164,616.00 164,616.00 0.00
PROJECT NO.1: TOTAL $
-------------- ----------- --------------
692,474.00
692,474.00
273,628.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 1 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
EAST "H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
MT. MIGUEL RD
COST
$273,628.00
$254,230.00
$164,616.00
$692,474.00
ALLOCATION
(DIF)
50.00%
100.00%
AD COST
(DIF)
$127,115.00
$164,616.00
$291,731.00
5-A
~
ACQt1J:SXTXON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
. (SALT CREEK I)
PART XX - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
AC PAVING
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MOBXLIZATION/DEMOBXLIZATION
STRIPING & SIGNAGE
STREET SURVEY MONUMENTS
TRENCH SHORING
SUPPLY BONDS
ACP 5"/6" AS
ACP ADDITIONAL 1/2"
CAB ADDITIONAL 1/2"
ACP (5/6)
SUBTOTAL
SIDEWALK/CURB & GUTTER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
12
6" TYPE G CURB & GUTTER
6" TYPE B1 CURB
6" TYPE A AC BERM
PEDESTRIAN RAMP
PCC SIDEWALK PAVING
PCC MEDIAN & MAINT. APRON
l' DEEP CONCRETE MOW STRIP
DEEP EDGE OF MEDIAN PLANTER
PCC DRIVEWAY
6" DEEP PCC SIDEWALK
GRASSCRETE PAVING
SUBTOTAL
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
23,000.00
9,000.00
2,530.00
2.00
22,000.00
169,884.00
240.00
140.00
224,523.00
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
23,000.00
9,000.00
2,530.00
2.00
22,000.00
169,884.00
240.00
140.00
224,523.00
451,319.00 451,319.00
49,072.50
38,115.00
3,450.00
882.00
60,217.50
68,378.30
2,798.60
5,016.00
8,432.00
850.00
15,491.00
252,702.90
5-8
h7
49,072.50
38,115.00
3,450.00
882.00
60,217.50
68,378.30
2,798.60
5,016.00
8,432.00
850.00
15,491.00
252,702.90
DIF
23,000.00
9,000.00
2,530.00
2.00
22,000.00
169,884.00
240.00
140.00
224,523.00
451,319.00
49,072.50
38,115.00
3,450.00
882.00
60,217.50
68,378.30
2,798.60
5,016.00
8,432.00
850.00
15,491.00
252,702.90
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
-,
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET (CON'!'INUED)
I'l'EM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED DIF
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
JOIN'!' TRENCH
1 ELEC/GAS/TELEPHONE/CABLE 95,000.00 95,000.00
2 ELEC/GAS/TELE/CABLE(H ST) 60,000.00 60,000.00
SUBTOTAL 155,000.00 155,000.00
WALLS/FENCING
1 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,320.00 7,320.00 7,320.00
2 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00
3 WROUGHT IRON FENCING 6,228.00 6,228.00
4 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 1 19,000.00 19,000.00
5 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2 27,590.00 27,590.00
6 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2A 37,324.00 37,324.00
7 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 4 104,490.00 104,490.00
8 BLOCK COLUMN/ANTI-GRAFFITI 11,220.00 11,220.00
SUBTOTAL 220,612.00 220,612.00 14,760.00
STREET LIGHTS
1 STREET LIGHT 34,200.00 34,200.00 34,200.00
2 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 6,100.00 6,100.00 6,100.00
3 STREET LIGHT 26,000.00 26,000.00 26,000.00
4 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 2,800.00 2,800.00 2,800.00
SUBTOTAL 69,100.00 69,100.00 69,100.00
RETAINING WALLS SUBTOTAL 30,000.00 30,000.00 30,000.00
5-C
6S
ACQt1J:SITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
."
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET (CONTINUED)
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
LANDSCAPE BETWEEN EASTLAKE DRIVE AND SR 125
1 SUPPLY BONDS
2- AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
3 SOIL TESTS, SOIL PREP.
4 l-GALLON SHRUB
5 5-GALLON SHRUB
6 15-GALLON SHRUB
7 GROUND COVER
8 2" LAYER BARK MULCH
9 TREE STAKING COMP.
10 TREE DRAINAGE COMPo
11 HYDROSEED
12 FLAT PLANTS COMP.
13 36" INSIDE DU. X 18"HT.
PRECAST CONC. TREEWELL
14 90-DAY MAINT. OF LANDSCAPE
15 TRAFFIC CONTROL
SUBTOTAL
12,050.00
77,004.00
5,589.00
6,220.00
11,388.00
10,868.00
7,864.00
3,007.00
1,235.00
2,470.00
195.00
146.25
20,995.00
1,863.00
5,000.00
165,894.25
LANDSCAPE FROM SR 125 TO MT. MIGUEL RD.
1 SLUMP BLOCK SIGN WALL
2 4' SLUMP BLOCK PLASTER
3 SIGN PLANTER WALL
4 4" ASPHALT PAVING
5 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM
6 SOIL TESTS, SOIL PREP.
7 l-GALLON SHRUB
8 5-GALLON SHRUB
9 15-GALLON SHRUB
10 15-GALLON TREE
11 48" BOX TREE
12 6" POTTED PLANTS
13 FLAT PLANTS AT CRIB
14 HYDROSEED #4
15 FLAT PLANTS COMP.
16 36" INSIDE DIA. X 18" BT
PRECAST CONC. TREEWELL
17 TREE DRAINAGE SYSTEM
'18 TREE STAKING COMP.
19 SHREDDED BARK MULCH
20 90-DAY MAINT. OF LANDSCAPE
SUBTOTAL
3,150.00
1,600.00
19,425.00
11,250.00
43,365.90
6,500.39
2,944.00
3,840.00
1,188.00
6,204.00
11,700.00
2,350.00
300.00
3,064.46
2,507.29
10,540.00
1,240.00
705.00
2,852.31
2,166.80
136,893.15
5-D
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
12,050.00
77,004.00
5,589.00
6,220.00
11,388.00
10,868.00
7,864.00
3,007.00
1,235.00
2,470.00
195.00
146.25
20,995.00
1,863.00
5,000.00
165,894.25
3,150.00
1,600.00
19,425.00
11,250.00
43,365.90
6,500.39
2,944.00
3,840.00
1,188.00
6,204.00
11,700.00
2,350.00
300.00
3,064.46
2,507.29
10,540.00
1,240.00
705.00
2,852.31
2,166.80
136,893.15
6,9
DIF
12,050.00
77,004.00
5,589.00
6,220.00
11,388.00
10,868.00
7,864.00
3,007.00
1,235.00
2,470.00
195.00
146.25
20,995.00
1,863.00
5,000.00
165,894.25
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
43,365.90
6,500.39
2,944.00
3,840.00
1,188.00
6,204.00
0.00
2,350.00
300.00
3,065.00
2,507.00
2,998.71
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75,263.00
.
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 2: EAST "H" STREET (CONTINUED )
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED DIF
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
EROSION CONTROL FROM SR 125 TO NT. MIGUEL RD.
1 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 122,614.22 122,614.22
2 SOIL TESTS, SOIL PREP. 16,395.40 16,395.40
3 1-GALLON SHRUB 7,440.00 7,440.00
4 1-GALLON TREE 1,732.00 1,732.00
5 15-GALLON TREE 1,408.00 1,408.00
6 HYDROSEED MIX #1 3,295.50 3,295.50
7 HYDRO SEED MIX #2 11,292.55 11,292.55
8 HYDROSEED MIX #3 2,293.61 2,293.61
9 HYDROSEED MIX #4 2,255.00 2,255.00
10 HYRDOSEED MIX #5 202.38 202.38
11 TREE STAKING 2,305.00 2,305.00
12 #2 PLAT PLANTS 1,845.00 1,845.00
13 90-DAY MAINT. OF LANDSCAPE 7,869.79 7,869.79
SUBTOTAL 180,948.45 180,948.45
PROJECT NO.2: TOTAL
1,662,469.75
1,662,469.75
817,881.90
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 2 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
AC PAVING $451,319.00 (DIF) (DIF)
SIDEWALK/C " G $252,702.90 (DIF) (DIF)
JOINT TRENCH $155,000.00 100.00t $155,000.00
BLK. WALLS/RL FENC $220,612.00 93.31\ $205,853.06
STREET LIGHTS $69,100.00 (DIF) (DIF)
RETAINING WALLS $30,000.00 (DIF) (DIF)
LANDSCAPING $483,735.85 51. lOt $247,189.02
$1,662,469.75 $608,042.08
,
5-E
~
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREER I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
ROUGH GRADING
EROSION CONTROL
1 SANDBAGS
FENCING/WALLS
1
2
3
2' BLOCK 3' W.I.
3' BLOCK 3 GLASS
6'-9' BLOCK
LANDSCAPE
1 IRRIGATION
2 LANDSCAPE
3 HYDROSEED
4 90-DAY KAINT.
SUBT.OTAL
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
67,500.00
49,500.00
150,000.00
267,000.00
44,190.00
24,356.00
22,541. 00
5,914.00
97,001.00
369,001.00
'.
SUBTOTAL
67,500.00
49,500.00
150,000.00
267,000.00
SUBTOTAL
44,190.00
24,356.00
22,541. 00
5,914.00
97,001. 00
SUBTOTAL
369,001. 00
SUKKARY OF PROJECT NO. 3 ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
COST
$5,000.00
$267,000.00
$97,001.00
ROUGH GRADING
FENCING/WALLS
LANDSCAPE
$369,001. 00
5.f
ALLOCATION
O.oot
100.00t
O.oot
1/
AD COST
$0.00
$267,000.00
$0.00
$267,000.00
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 4 - WATER SYSTEM
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
RST.REET
1 12" ACP
2 16" ACP
3 12" GATE VALVE
4 16" GATE VALVE
5 CONNECT #1 TO EXIST, 12"
6 CONNECT #2 TO EXIST, 16"
7 1" AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY
8 2" AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY
10 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY
11 12" ACP WATER MAIN
12 16" ACP WATER MAIN
13 2" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY
14 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY
SUBTOTAL
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 12" ACP CL150
2 6" FIRE HYDRANT
3 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE
SUBTOTAL
MT. MIGUEL ROAD
1 16" ACP CL150
2 2" BLOW OFF
3 4" BLOW OFF
4 6" PRESSURE REDUCING STA.
SUBTOTAL
UNI';1' 1
1
2
3
4
5
10" ACP CL150
12" ACP CL150
6" FIRE HYDRANT
10" GATE VALVE
1" AIR RELEASE
SUBTOTAL
60,000.00 60,000.00
85,510.00 85,510.00
7,200.00 7,200.00
2,500.00 2,500.00
2,400.00 2,400.00 -
3,200.00 3,200.00
4,500.00 4,500.00
8,500.00 8,500.00
13,200.00 13,200.00
10,695.00 10,695.00
58,140.00 58,140.00
4,800.00 4,800.00
9,600.00 9,600.00
270,245.00 270,245.00
44,960.00 44,960.00
6,300.00 6,300..00
900.00 900.00
52,160.00 52,160.00
.
47,544.00 47,544.00
850.00 850.00
1,400.00 1,400.00
34,500.00 34,500.00
84,294.00 84,294.00
24,192.00
3,920.00
8,400.00
2,250.00
1,200.00
39,962.00
24,192.00
3,920.00
8,400.00
2,250.00
1,200.00
39;962.00
5-G
7P-
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO...4 - WATER SYSTEM (CONTINUED)
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
WIT 2
1 10" ACP CL150
2 8" GATE VALVE
3 10" GATE VALVE
4 CONNECT TO EXISTING
9,584.00
609.00
3,750.00
1,000.00
14,934.00
SUBTOTAL
WIT 3
1 10" ACP CL150
2 12" ACP CL150
3 6" FIRE HYDRANT
4 8" GATE VALVE
5 10" GATE VALVE
6 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE
7 1" AIR RELEASE
8 CONNECT TO EXISTING
11,120.00
9,560.00
4,200.00
600.00
5,250.00
900.00
1,200.00
2,000.00
SUBTOTAL
34,830.00
WATER SYSTEM SUBTOTAL
PROJECT NO. 4 - TOTAL
496,425.00
9,584.00
600.00
3,750.00
1,000.00
14,934.00
11,120.00
9,560.00
4,200.00
600.00
5,250.00
900.00
1,200.00
2,000.00
34,830.00
496,425.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 4 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT:
EAST "H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
MT. MIGUEL RD
WIT 1
WIT 2
WIT 3
COST
$270,245.00
$52,160.00
$84,294.00
$39,962.00
$14,934.00
$34,830.00
$496,425.00
5-H
ALLOCATION
37.00%
36.00%
33.00%
70.00%
70.00%
70.00%
73
AD COST
$99,990.65
$18,777.60
$27,817.02
$27,973.40
$10,453.80
$24,381.00
$209,393.47
:
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. _5: RECLAIMED WATER
ITEM
NO. DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
B STREET
1 16" ACP
2 16" GATE VALVE
3 6" RP BACKFLOW
4 2" AIR-VAC ASSESMBLY
5 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY
6 2" WATER SERVICE
7 16" ACP RECL. WATER LINE
8 16" GATE VALVE
9 6" RP BACKFLOW PREVENTOR
SUBTOTAL
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1
2
3
4
16" ACP CL200
8" GATE VALVE
2" AIR & VAC ASSEMBLY
2" WATER SERVICE
SUBTOTAL
NT. MIGUEL ROAD
1 16" ACP CL200
2 8" ACP CL200
3 4" BLOW OFF
4 1" AIR RELEASE
5 2" AIR & VAC ASSEMBLY
6 2" WATER SERVICE
SUBTOTAL
UNIT 1
1
2
3
4
8" ACP CL200
8" GATE VALVE
2" BLOW OFF
2" WATER SERVICE
SUBTOTAL
86,040.00
7,500.00
6,400.00
3,400.00
3,200.00
9,900.00
57,905.00
5,200.00
6,400.00
185,945.00
76,825.00
1,200.00
1,800.00
1,000.00
80,825.00
26,215.00
19,908.00
3,100.00
1,200.00
3,600.00
3,000.00
57,023.00
8,02'2.00
600.00
850.00
2,000.00
11,472.00
86,040.00
7,500.00
6,400.00
3,400.00
3,200.00
9,900.00
57,905.00
5,200.00
6,400.00
185,945.00
76,825.00
1,200.00
1,800.00
1,000.00
80,825.00
26,215.00
19,908.00
3,100.00
1,200.00
3,600.00
3,000.00
57,023.00
8,022.00
600.00
850.00
2,000.00
11,472.00
PROJECT NO.5: TOTAL
------------- ------------
$335,265.00
$335,265.00
5-1
73
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEX I)
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER
PART II COST ESTIMATES
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 5 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRrCT:
EAST "H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
MT. MIGUEL RD
tJNIT 1
COSTS
$185,945.00
$80,825.00
$57,023.00
$11,472.00
$335,265.00
5- J
ALLOCATION
60.00t
60.00t
82.00t
100.00t
7#-
AD COST
$111,567.00
$48,495.00
$46,758.86
$11,472.00
$218,292.86
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 6: SEWER SYSTEM
ITEM PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NO. DESCRIPTION TOTAL TOTAL
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 10" PVC SEWER 3,468.00 3,468.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 3,000.00 3,000.00
SUBTOTAL 6,468.00 6,468.00
NT. MIGUEL ROAD
1 10" PVC SEWER 18,530.00 18,530.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 10,500.00 10,500.00
3 SEWER CONNECTION 1,000.00 1,000.00
SUBTOTAL 30,030.00 30,030.00
UNIT 1
1 10" PVC SEWER 34,714.00 34,714.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 13,500.00 13,500.00
3 CUT OFF WALL 2,400.00 2,400.00
SUBTOTAL 50,614.00 50,614.00
------------- -----------
PROJECT NO. 6: TOTAL $87,112.00 $87,112.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 4 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT:
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
NT. MIGUEL RD
UNIT 1
COST
$6,468.00
$30,030.00
$50,614.00
ALLOCATION
47.00t
60.00t
42.00t
$87,112.00
5-K
7.5
AD COST
$3,039.96
$18,018.00
$21,257.88
$42,315.84
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I:)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 7: PROCTOR VALLEY OFFSITE SEWER
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
1 MOBILIZATION 40,000.00 40,000.00
2 SUPPLY BONDS 6,500.00 6,500.00
3 15" PVC SEWER 110,600.00 110,600.00
4 12" PVC SEWER 33,980.00 33,980.00
5 10" PVC SEWER 82,460.00 82,460.00
6 SEWER MANHOLE 46,400.00 46,400.00
7 CONNECTI:ON TO EXI:STI:NG 500.00 500.00
8 CONNECTI:ON TO EXI:STI:NG 500.00 500.00
9 CONCRETE CRADLE 7,500.00 7,500.00
10 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 5,400.00 5,400.00
11 JACKED STEEL CASI:NG 23,744.00 23,744.00
12 TRENCH SHORING 17,725.00 17,725.00
------------- -----------
PROJECT NO.7: TOTAL 375,309.00 375,309.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 7 COSTS ALLOCATI:ON TO DISTRICT:
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
$375,309.00 26.00% $97,580.34
OFFSITE SEWER
5- L
76
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
TOTAL
CONFIRMED
TOTAL
DIF
EAST "H" STREET
1 18" RCP
2 24" RCP
3 36" RCP
4 42" RCP
5 48" RCP
6 CONC. ENERGY DISSAPATOR
7 WING TYPE HEADWALL
8 TYPE B1 CURB INLET
9 TYPE B1 CURB INLET W/LUG
10 TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT
11 TYPE A-5 CLEANOUT
12 TYPE A-8 MOD. CLEANOUT
13 TYPE F CATCH BASIN
14 MOD. TYPE F CATCH BASIN
15 DRAINAGE BASIN
16 TYPE AS CLEANOUT/TO GRADE
17 BROOKS 12"x12" CATCH BASIN
18 6" PVC
19 CONNECT TO 48" RCP CLEANOUT
20 CONNECT TO EXISTING 48" RCP
21 18" RCP
22 24" RCP
23 36" RCP
24 TYPE B1 CURB INLET
25 TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT
26 CURB OUTLET TYPE D-25
27 BRICK' MORTOR PLUG
28 6" PVC
29 CONNECT 36" RCP TO CLEANOUT
SUBTOTAL
12,900.00
10,575.00
4,500.00
31,590.00
48,760.00
22,000.00
4,000.00
23,800.00
7,200.00
3,200.00
9,300.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
2,200.00
1,100.00
880.00
10,920.00
10,010.00
680.00
326.00
4,805.00
1,710.00
94,185.00
10,800.00
11,600.00
4,000.00
10.00
7,350.00
500.00
347,901.00
5-M
12,900.00
10,575.00
4,500.00
31,590.00
48,760.00
22,000.00
4,000.00
23,800.00
7,200.00
3,200.00
9,300.00
5,000.00
4,000.00
2,200.00
1,100.00
880.00
10,920.00
10,010.00
680.00
326.00
4,805.00
1,710.00
94,185.00
10,800.00
11,600.00
4,000.00
10.00
7,350.00
500.00
347,901.00
/7
4,500.00
31,590.00
48,760.00
22,000.00
4,000.00
23,800.00
7,200.00
3,200.00
5,000.01.
2,140.00
152,190.00
ACQursrrroN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM (CONTINUED)
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED DIP
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 18" RCP 1350D 5,504.00 5,504.00
2 36" RCP 1350D 5,546.00 5,546.00
3 42" RCP 1350D 4,380.00 4,380.00
4 60" RCP 1350D 147,290.00 147,290.00
5 60" RCP 1650D 41,658.00 41,658.00
6 66" RCP 116,358.00 116,358.00
7 CONC LUG 1,116.00 1,116.00
8 A6 CLEANOUT 2,900.00 2,900.00
9 A 7 CLEANOUT 9,120.00 9,120.00
10 SPECIAL CLEANOUT 7,300.00 7,300.00
11 11' Bl INLET 4,150.00 4,150.00
12 13' Bl INLET 3,450.00 3,450.00
13 15' Bl INLET 3,660.00 3,660.00
14 17' Bl INLET 4,810.00 4,810.00
15 F CATCH BASIN 2,350.00 2,350.00
16 WING HEADWALL 10,500.00 10,500.00
17 RIP RAP 5,900.00 5,900.00
18 A-6 CLEANOUT X-6 Y-7 8,900.00 8,900.00
19 A-7 CLEANOUT X=7 Y-7 4,500.00 4,500.00
20 SPEC. SLURRY FOR DOUBLE 66" 5,880.00 5,880.00
21 BLASTING/ADD'NL BACKFILL 60,000.00 60,000.00
SUBTOTAL 455,272.00 455,272.00 0.00
MT. HJ:GUEL ROAD
1 18" RCP 1350D 5,280.00 5,280.00
2 21" RCP 1350D 2,808.00 2,808.00
3 24" RCP 1350D 5,775.00 5,775.00
4 30" RCP 1350D 3,975.00 3,975.00
5 36" RCP 1350D 56,935.00 56,935.00
6 42" RCP 1350D 56,648.00 56,648.00
7 A4 CLEANOUT 20,320.00 20,320.00
8 5' B INLET 2,650.00 2,650.00
9 F CATCH BASIN 4,700.00 4,700.00
10 WING HEADWALL 3,500.00 3,500.00
11 RIP RAP 1,900.00 1,900.00
12 CUTOFF WALL 2,750.00 2,750.00
13 DESILTER 4,725.00 4,725.00
14 A-5 CLEANOUT 5,550.00 5,550.00
15 A-5 CLEANOUT X-5 Y"8 4,450.00 4,450.00
SUBTOTAL 181,966.00 181,966.00 0.00
5-n 78
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO. 8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM (CONTINUED)
ITEM DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED DIF
NO. TOTAL TOTAL
UNIT 1
1 18" RCP 1350D 11,040.00 11,040.00
2 42" RCP 1350D 104,682.00 104,682.00
3 42" RCP 1350D 7,656.00 7,656.00
4 48" RCP 1350D 34,860.00 34,860.00
5 48" RCP 1350D 17,181.00 17,181.00
6 CONC LUG 1,860.00 1,860.00
7 A-5 CLEANOUT 24,975.00 24,975.00
8 27' Bl INLET 4,850.00 4,850.00
9 26' Bl INLET 4,600.00 4,600.00
10 19' Bl INLET 4,100.00 4,100.00
11 21' Bl INLET 4,310.00 4,310.00
12 23' Bl INLET 4,350.00 4,350.00
13 F CATCH BASIN 7,050.00 7,050.00
14 CUTOFF WALL 5,500.00 5,500.00
15 9' Bl INLET 3,100.00 3,100.00
16 BLASTING/ADD'L BACKFILL 29,000.00 29,000.00
SUBTOTAL 269,114.00 269,114.00 0.00
-------------- -------------
PROJECT NO. 8: TOTAL 1,254,253.00 1,254,253.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO. 8 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT:
EAST "H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
MT. MIGUEL RD
UNIT 1
COST
$347,901.00
$455,272.00
$181,966.00
$269,114.00
ALLOCATION
56.25t
50.00t
100.00t
100.00t
AD COST
$195,711.01
$227,636.00
$181,966.00
$269,114.00
$1,254,253.00
$874,427.01
5":0
7'1!
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
SECTION "S"
MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Pursuantto Ordinance No. 2431 (amending Ordinance No. 2251), the Development
Impact Fee (DIF) as it relates to the funding of transportation facilities in the City's eastern
territories has been given a value per development type. Financial and engineering
studies, and the City's General Plan show that the transportation network in the Salt
Creek I area will be adversely impacted by new development unless new transportation
facilities are added to accommodate an increased traffic generation.
Mitigating facilities, as defined within the Eastern Area Develoement Imeact Fee for
Streets, Final 1990 Revision, are being constructed within the Salt Creek I project area.
Only those eligible DIF facilities within Assessment District No. 90-1 and their respective
costs shall be included within the assignment of the final spread to the parcels within the
boundary of the District, the remainder goes to DIF credit.
A. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
EAST "H" STREET:
Grading
Improvements
Storm Drain
Landscaping
Subtotal
$ 273,628.00
$ 817,881.90
$ 152,190.00
$ 236.154.00
$ 1,479,853.90
B. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
DIF PROGRAM SUPPORT (2%)
TOTAL
$ 27.637.92
$ 1,507,491.82
C. DISTRICT DIF GENERATION
166 SFR @ $3,060
2161WH @ $2,448
141 CDO @ $2,448
=
$ 507,960.00
$ 528,768.00
$ 345.168.00
=
=
MAXIMUM DIF
$ 1.381.896.00
BALANCE TO CREDIT
$ 125,595.82
6
'80
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90.1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - ESnMATE OF CONS1'RUCnON COS7S (CONTINUED)
A.D. 90-1 CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATION COST - SUMMARY
PROJECT NO.1: PROJECT GRADING
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET
PROJECT NO.3: SR 125 LANDSCAPING
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.7: OFFSITE SEWER SYSTEM
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST
CONTINGENCY (10%)
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST
PLUS TOTAL DIF
CONSTRUCTION COST
Preliminarv Confirmed
$ 291,731.0 $ 291,731.00
$ 608,042.08 $ 608,042.08
$ 267,000.00 $ 267,000.00
$ 209,393.47 . $ 209,393.47
$ 218,292.86 $ 218,292.86
$ 42,315.84 $ 42,315.84
$ 97,580.34 $ 97,580.34
$ 874.427.01 $ 874.427.01
$2,608,782.60 $2,608,782.60
$ 260.878.26 $ 260.878.26
$2,869,660.86 $2,869,660.86
$..:1,,326.816.00 $.1.381.896.00
$4,196,476.86 $4,251,556.86
7
'1'1
Preliminarv Confirmed
CONSTRUCTION COST: $ 4,196,476.86 $ 4,251,556.86
INCIDENTAL EXP~NSES
1. Project Management 16,000.00 16,000.00
2. Assessment Engineering 56,650.00 56,650.00
3. Design Engineering 65,000.00 65,000.00
4. Utility Consultant 11,335.00 11,335.00
5. Bond Counsel 35,390.42 35,126.38
6. FinanciaJ Consultant 63,000.00 63,000.00
7. Landscape Architect 29,641.00 29,641.00
8. Soils Engineering 44,111.00 44,111.00
9. Construction Surveying/Staking 63,886.00 63,886.00
10. Public Agency Project Management 45,700.00 45,700.00
11. Development Bond Premium 653.00 653.00
12. Permit Fees
Otay Water 23,700.00 23,700.00
SDG&E 20,000.00 20,000.00
S D County 1,319.00 1,319.00
City of C V 135,000.00 135,000.00
13. Printing, Advertising, Posting 1,000.00 1,000.00
14. Utility Fee 144,790.00 144,790.00
Less Utility Refund < 116,349.00 > <116,349.00>
15. Printing of Bid Documents 14,618.00 20,000.00
16. Bond Printing, Servicing &
Registration 10.000.00 10.000.00
Subtotal Incidentals $ 665,448.42 $ 670,562.38
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION ~88.024.21) (615.955.89)
BOND COSTS
Capitalized Interest ( Six Mos. @ 8% ) 215,609.68 205,055.40
Bond Discount (3%) (2%) 161,707.26 102,527.70
Reserve Funds (10%) 539.024.21 512.638.49
Subtotal Bond Costs 916,341.15 820,221.59
TOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES - $ 1,193,765.36 $ 874,828.08
BOND COSTS
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $ 5,390,424.22 $ 5,126,384.94
8
~2.
-
.
AcaUlsmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913,
DIVISION 12 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODES
OF THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA
PART III - ASSESSMENT ROu..
WHEREAS, on September 17,1991, the City Council did, pursuant to the provisions
of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution of Intention No. 16343 for the
acquisition of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant
work in connection therewith in a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(Hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the appointed
Superintendent of Streets to make and file a report consisting of the following:
1) Plans and Specificetions;
2) Cost of Improvements;
3) A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of improvement
levied upon the parcels and lots of land within the boundaries of the assessment
district;
4) Assessment Diagram showing the assessment district and the subdivisions of
land contained herein;
5) A description of the public Improvements to be acquired;
6) Assessment Engineer's Certificate verifying improvements.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as adopted by the City
Council. .
9
~
NOW THEREFORE, I, John P. Uppitt, as appointed Superintendent of Streets, and
pursuant to the 'Municipallmprovement Act of 1913', do herein submit the following:
1) I, pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, have assessed
the costs and expenses of the works of improvement to be performed in the
Assessment District upon the parcels of land in the Assessment District benefitted
thereby in direct proportion and relation to the estimated benefits to be received
by each of said parcels. For particulars of the identification of said parcels,
reference is made to the Assessment Diagram.
2) As required by law, a Diagram is herein included, showing the Assessment District
boundary, as well as the boundaries of the benefitting parcels within the district
as the same existed at the time of the passage of said Resolution of Intention,
each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots respectively have been given
a separate number upon said Diagram and in said Assessment Roll.
3) The subdivisions and parcels of land and the numbers therein as shown on the
respective Assessments Diagram as included herein correspond with the numbers
as appearing on the Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4) NOTICE IS HEREBY 'GIVEN that bonds will be issued in accordance with Division
10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Califomia (the 'Improvement
Bond Act of 1915'), to represent all unpaid assessments and the last installment
of said bonds shall mature a maximum of TWENTY-FIVE (25) YEARS from the
day of next succeeding twelve (12) months from their date.
Said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to exceed the current legal maximum
of'12% per annum.
5) By virtue of the authority contained in said 'Municipallmprovement Act of 1913',
and by further direction and order of the City Council, I hereby make the following
assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of Improvement for the
Assessment District based on the costs and expenses as set forth below:
Preliminary Confirmed
$ 4,196,476.86 $ 4,251,556.86
< 388,024.21> < 615,955.89>
$ 665,448.42 $ 670,562.38
$ 916.341.15 $ 820.221.59
$ 5,390,424.22 $ 5,126,384.94
Acquisition Construction Cost
Less Developer Contribution
Incidental Expenses
Costs of Issuance
Balance to Assessment
For particulars as to the individual assessments and their descriptions, reference is made
to the Assessment Roll attached hereto.
10
<6Lf
~MFS
6) In addition to or as a part of the assessment lien levied against each parcel
of land within the Assessment District, each parcel of land shall also be
subject to an annual assessment to pay costs Incurred by the City and not
- otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of
assessmentS or from the administration or registration of any bonds and/or
reserve or other related funds. The maximum &mount of such annual
assessment upon each parcel of land shall not exceed 5% of the amount of
the annual assessment installment.
7) All costs and expenses of the works of improvement have been assessed to
all parcels of land within the Assessment District in a manner which is more
clearly defined In the 'Method and Formula of Assessment Spread', which is
a part of this Assessment Roll.
This preliminary report dated: S ~. J ') I 1991
9f: #-/ '4---
- John P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chura Vista
State of California
This final report dated: , 1991
By:
John P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
11
@
55
-
,
1l-Oct-Il
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMEIIT DISTRICT lID. ID-I
(SALT CREEl( II
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CIIIIFIRMED
IOS. API DESCRIPTION IMlER ASMT. ASMT.
1 15I5-38D-DOl IlDT 1. MAP 12827 11-212014 IFM PROJECTS. Jilt C\D THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
r 1595-3&0-002 ILOT r. !lAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. Jilt C\O THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
3 1595-380-003 IlOT 3. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. lilt C\O THE IIAlDIIIM CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
4 15I5-38D-004 IlOT 4. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. lilt C\D THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
5 1595-380-D05 ILOT 5. !lAP 12827 11-212094 I FM PROJECTS. lilt C\O THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
8 1595-380-D06 ILOT 6. MAP 12827 11-212014 I FM PROJECTS. JNC C\O THE IIAlDIIIM CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
7 1595-380-DD7 ILOT 7. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. IMe C\O THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
8 1595-38D-D08 I LDT 8. MAP 12827 11-212094 I FM PROJECTS. lit C\D THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
I 1595-380-009 IlOT I. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIM CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
10 1595-380-010 ILOT 10. !lAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.287.85 13.049.61
11 1595-380-011 ILOT 11. MAP 12827 11-292014 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.287.85 13.049.81
12 1595-380-012 IloT 12. !lAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\D THE IIAlDIIIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
13 1595-380-013 ILDT 13. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.287.85 13.049.61
14 1595-380-014 (LOT 14. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. IMC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
15 1595-380-015 ILDT 15. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFMPROJECTS. JNC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
16 1595-380-016 IlOT 16. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
17 1595-380-017 IlOT 17. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IIAlDIIIM CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
18 1515-380-018 ILOT 18. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\D THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
19 1595-380-019 IlOT 19. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
20 1595-38D-020 ILDT 20. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
21 1595-380-021 IlOT 21. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. IMe C\D THE BALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
rz 1595-380-022 IlOT 22. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
23 1595-380-023 ILOT 23. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\D THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
24 1595-380-024 ILOT 24. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.287.85 I 13.049.81
25 1595-380-025 ILOT 25. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FN PROJECTS. IMC C\D THE,IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
26 1595-380-026 ILOT 26. MAP 12827 11-192094 I FM PROJECTS. JNt C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.041.61
27 1595-380-027 ILOT 27. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIM CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
28 1595-380-028 ILOT 28. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.61
29 1595-380-029 IlOT 29. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. lit C\D THE IALDWIM CD. 14.267.85 1 13.049.61
30 1595-380-030 IlOT 3D. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\D THE IIAlDIIIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.61
31 1595-38D-031 ILOT 31. !lAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INt C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
32 1595-380-032 ILOT 32. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. IMe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
33 1595-380-033 ILOT 33. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
34 1595-38D-034 IlOT 34. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIM CD. 14.267.85 J 13.049.61
35 1595-38D-035 IloT 35. MAP 12827 11-292014 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.61
38 1595-380-036 ILOT 36. !lAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. IMe C\O THE 8AIJ!IIIM CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.61
37 1585-38D-037 ILOT 37. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FM PROJECTS. IMC C\D THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
38 1595-38D-038 ILOT 38. !lAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IIAlDIIIM CD. 14.287.85 I 13.049.81
31 1515-380-039 IlDT 39. MAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. lit C\D THE IALDWIN CD. J 14.287.85 I 13.049.61
40 1595-380-040 IlOT 40. !lAP 12827 11-212094 IFM PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I . 14.267.85 I 13.049.81
41 1595-38D-041 ILOT 41. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFM PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 I 13.049.61
gt;
.:
16-Oct-91
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 110. .0-1
(SALT CREEK I)
ASMT LE6AL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
IDS. API( DESCRIPTION DI/IIER ASMT. ASMT.
42 1595-380-042 ILDT 42. MAP 12827 '1-212094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 13.049.11
43 1595-380-043 (LOT 43. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. t 14.287.85 13.049.81
44 1595-310-044 (LOT 44. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 13.049.81
45 1595-380-045 ILOT 45. MAP 12827 91-212094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
46 1595-380-046 ILOT 46. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
47 1595-380-047 ILDT 47. MAP 12827 11-292094 (FN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 13.048.81
48 1595-380-048 ILOT 48. MAP 12827 81-282094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. ( 14.287.85 13.049.81
48 1595-380-049 ILOT 49. MAP 12827 81-292084 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
50 1595-380-050 ILDT 50. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 13.048.61
51 1595-380-0S1 ILOT 51. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\D THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 13.048.11
52 1595-381-001 ILOT 52. MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE BALMN CO. 1 14.287.85 13.048.81
53 1595-381-002 ILOT 53. MAP 12827 91-292084 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/!N CO. I 14.267.85 13.048.61
54 1595-381-003 ILDT 54. MAP 12827 11-282094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/IN CD. I 14.287.85 13.049.11
55 1585-311-004 ILOT 55. MAP 12827 91-212094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.287.85 13.049.11
58 1595-381-005 (LOT 56. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. !NC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
57 1595-381-006 ILOT 57. MAP 12827 91-282094 I FN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
58 1595-381-007 ILOT 58. MAP 12827 11-282094 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
59 1595-381-008 I LOT 59. MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.11
10 1595-381-009 ILOT 60. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.61
81 1595-381-010 ILOT 81. MAP 12827 91-292094 IAN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE IALDVIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.81
62 1595-381-011 ILOT 62. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FN PROJECTS. !NC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. 14.267.8S 13.049.81
13 1595-381-012 ILOT 13. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.61
84 1595-381-013 (LOT 84. MAP 12827 11-282094 IFN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.11
85 1595-381-014 ILOT 65. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. !NC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.81
86 1595-381-015 ILOT 86. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDW!N CO. 14.267.85 13.048.61
87 1595-381-016 ILOT 67. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.287.85 13.049.81
88 1595-381-017 ILOT 88. MAP 12827 11-292094 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.81
89 1595-381-018 I LOT 89. MAP 12827 11-292094 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.048.81
70 1595-311-019 ILOT 70. MAP 12827 11-212094 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. 14.267.85 13.049.61
71 1595-390-001 (LOT 1. MAP 12828 91-282095 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.11 I
72 1595-390-002 (LOT 2. MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.267.85 I 13.049.81 I
73 1595-310-003 I LOT 3. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.267.85 I 13.049.61 I
74 1595-310-004 I LOT 4. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PRoJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.61 I
75 1595-310-005 ILOT 5. MAP 12828 11-292095 I FN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.61 I
71 1595-310-009 ILOT 8. MAP 12828 11-212095 IFN PROJECTS. lie C\O TIlE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.81 I
77 1595-390-007 I LOT 7. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.041.11 I
78 1595-390-008 ILOT 8. MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.61 I
71 1595-310-009 ILOT I. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PROJECTS. INt C\O THE IALDWIN CO. I 14.217.85 I 13.049.61 I
10 1595-310-010 ILOT 10. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PROJECTS. lie C\O THE BALDI/IN CO. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.11 I
11 1595-390-011 ILOT 11. MAP 12828 11-292095 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CO. ( 14.287.85 I 13.049.11 I
~7
16-OCt-81
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 10. 10-1
(SAt T CREEK I)
ASIIT Lt6AL PRELIMINARY CllMFIRMED
IDS. AIIN DESCRIPTION IMlER ASIIT . ASIIT .
12 1595-310-012 IlOT 12. MAP 12121 91-292095 In PRDJECTS. INC c\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.61
13 1595-310-013 IlOT 13. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.217.15 13.041.11
14 1515-390-014 IlOT 14. MAP 12121 11-212015 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.217.15 13.049.11
15 1515-380-015 (lOT 15. MAp 12121 11-282015 In PRDJECTS. IHe C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.048.11 .-
16 1515-390-016 IlOT 16. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. IHe C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.61
17 1595-390-017 IlOT 17. MAP 12121 91-212095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.11
18 1515-310-011 (lOT 11. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PRDJECTS. IHe C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.11
19 1515-390-019 (lOT 19. MAP 12121 11-292015 InPRDJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.041.11
10 1595-390-020 IlOT 20. MAP 12121 91-292095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.11
II 1595-390-021 IlOT 21. MAP 12121 91-292095 (n PROJECTS. IHe C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.61
12 1595-390-022 (lOT 22. MAP 12121 11-292015 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.11
13 1595-390-023 IlOT 23. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BAlDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.049.11
14 1595-310-024 IlOT 24. MAP 12121 91-292095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O TME BALDIIIN co. 14.267.15 13.041.11
IS (595-390-025 (lOT 25. MAP 12121 11-212015 In PROJECTS. IHe C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 13.049.61
II 1595-390-026 IlOT 26. MAP 12121 11-292015 In PROJECTS. IHC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 1 14.267.15 13.049.61
17 1515-390-027 (lOT 27. MAP 12121 91-292015 In PRDJECTS. IHe C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 13.041.61
II 1595-390-021 IlOT 21. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIH co. I 14.267.15 13.049.61
19 1515-390-029 IlOT 29. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BAlDIIIN CO. 1 14.267.15 13.049.11
100 1515-390-030 IlOT 30. MAP 12121 91-292095 In PROJECTS. IHC C\O THE BALDIIIH co. I', 14.267.15 13.049.11
101 1595-390-031 IlOT 31. MAP 12121 11-212015 In PROJECTS. IHC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. I' 14.267.15 13.041.11
102 1595-390-032 IlOT 32. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PRDJECTS. INC C\O THE BALOWIN co. I 14.267.15 13.049.11
103 1515-390-033 IlOT 33. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PRDJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIH co. I 14.217.15 13.049.61
104 1515-390-034 flOT 34. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PRDJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIH co. 1 14.267.15 13.041.61
. 105 1515-390-035 IlOT 35. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 13.049.61
106 1515-390-036 IlOT 36. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BALOWIN co. I 14.267.15 13.049.61
107 1515-390-037 Il0T 37. MAP 12121 11-292095 In PROJECTS. lilt C\O TIt[ BAlDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 13.049.61
lOB 1595-390-031 ILOT 31. MAP 12121 11-212095 In PROJECTS. lilt C\O THE BALDIIIH CO. I 14.267.15 " 13.049.61
109 1515-400-001 I LOT 1. MAP 12129 91-212096 In PROJECTS. lilt C\O THE BAlDIIIN CO. r 14.267.15 I 13.049.61 I
110 1595-400-002 IlOT 2. MAP 12129 11-292096 In PROJECTS. IHC C\O THE BALOWIN CO. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.11 I
111 1515-400-003 1 lOT 3. MAP 12829 11-292096 In PROJECT5. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 I 13.049.61 I
uz 1515-400-004 I lOT 4. MAP 12921 11-292096 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BAlDIIIN CO. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.61 I
113 1515-400-005 IlOT 5. MAP 12129 11-212096 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN CO. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.11 I
114 1595-400-006 ILOT 6. MAP 12129 11-292096 In PROJECTS. lilt C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. 1 ' 14.267.15 I 13.049.61 I
115 1595-400-007 1 lOT 7. MAP 12121 11-292096 1 n PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.11 I
116 1595-400-001 IlOT I. MAP 12129 11-212096 In PROJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN co. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.11 I
117 1515-400-009 I lOT I. MAP 12129 11-212016 I n PROJECTS. INC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIH CO. I 14.217.15 1 13.041.11 I
111 1595-400-010 ILOT 10. MAP 12129 11-212016 I n PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN CO. I 14.267.15 I 13.049.11 1
111 1595-400-011 IlOT 11. MAP 12129 11-212096 In PROJECTS. IHC C\O TIt[ BALDIIIN CO. I 14.267.15 1 13.049.61 I
120 1595-400-012 IlOT 12. MAP 12129 11-292096 1 n PROJECTS. lilt C\O THE BALDIIIN co. I 14.217.15 I 13.049.11 I
121 1595-400-013 ILOT 13. MAP 12129 91-212096 In PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDIIIN co. 1 14.267.15 I 13.049.61 I
~
16-Oct-91
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITIOII
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 10. .0-1
lSAL T CREEK 11
ASMT LE&AL PRELIMIIlARY toNFIRMED
105. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
122 1595-400-014 ILOT 14. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
123 1595-400-015 ILOT 15. MAP 12829 81-292096 1 FN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
124 1595-400-016 ILOT 18. MAP 12829 '1-292096 I FN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIR CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
125 1595-400-017 ILOT 17. MAP 12828 81-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.048.61
126 1595-400-018 ILOT 18. MAP 12829.91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
127 1595-400-019 ILOT 19. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
128 1595-400-020 ILOT 20. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
129 1595-400-021 ILOT 21. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
130 1595-400-022 ILOT 22. MAP 12829 91-292096 1 FN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
131 1595-400-023 ILOT 23. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
132 1595-400-024 ILOT 24. MAP 12829 81-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
133 1595-400-025 ILOT 25. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
134 1595-400-026 ILOT 26. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
135 1595-400-027 ILOT 27. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.287.85 13.049.81
136 (595-400-028 ILOT 28. MAP 12829 81-292096 1 FN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 1 14.267.85 13.049.81
137 1595-400-029 ILOT 29. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 1 14.267.85 13.049.61
138 1595-400-030 ILOT 3D. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 1 14.267.85 13.049.61
139 1595-400-031 ILOT 31. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 1 14.267.85 13.049.61
140 1595-400-032 (LOT 32. MAP 12829 81-282096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. I 14.267.15 13.049.81
141 1595-400-033 ILOT 33. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.11
142 1595-400-034 ILOT 34. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
143 1595-400-035 ILOT 35. MAP 12129 81-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
144 1595-400-036 ILOT 36. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
145 1595-400-037 ILOT 37. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
146 1595-400-038 (LOT 38. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
147 1595-400-039 ILOT 39. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
148 1595-400-040 ILOT 40. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\D THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
149 1595-400-041 ILOT 41. MAP 12829 81-292096 I FN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.15 13.049.61
150 1595-400-042 ILOT 42. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
151 1595-400-043 1 LOT U. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
152 1595-400-044 ILOT 44. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
153 1595-400-045 ILOT 45. MAP 12829 91-292096 1 FN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.61
154 1595-400-046 ILOT 46. MAP 12829 81-282096 IFN PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
155 1595-400-047 ILOT 47. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 14.267.15 13.049.61
156 1595-400-048 ILOT 48. MAP 12829 91-282096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWII CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
157 1595-400-049 ILOT 49. MAP 12829 81-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\D THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.048.81
158 1.595-400-050 ILOT 50. MAP 12829 91-29209t IFN PROJECTS. IIC C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.15 13.049.81
159 1595-400-051 ILOT 51. MAP 12829 91-292096 1 FN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. 14.267.85 13.049.81
160 1595-400-052 I LOT 52. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRC C\O THE IALDWII CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
161 1595-400-053 ILOT 53. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IIC C\O THE IALDWII CO. I 14.267.85 13.049.61
162 1595-400-054 1 LOT 54. MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS. IRe C\O THE IALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 13.049.81
w
II-Oct-II
ASSESSMENT ROlL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 10. 90-1
(SAlT CREEK 1)
ASHT LE6AL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
IDS. API! DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASIIT .
1&3 1595-400-055 (LOT 55. MAP 12829 '1-2'2096 1 FW PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IlAlJ)l/IN CD. I 14.261.85 I 13.049.61 I
164 1595-400-056 ILOT 56. MAP 12829 'I-U2096 I FW PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IlAlJ)l/IN CD. I 14.267.85 I 13.04'.61 I
185 1595-4DD-057 ILOT 57. MAP 128Z9 '1-292096 I FW PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. I 14.267.85 I 13.04'.61 I
188 1595-4DD-058 (LOT 58. MAP 12829 '1-292096 I FW PROJECTS. INC C\O THE IlAlJ)l/IN CD. I 14.287.85 I 13.049.81 I
187 1595-310-039 IEXEMPT ICITY OF DtULA VISTA I 0.00 I O.DD I
188 1595-400-059 IEXEMPT ICITY OF DtULA VISTA I 0.00 I 0.00 I
189 1595-380-021 IEXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA I 0.00 I O.DD I
170 1595-380-170 JEXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA I 0.00 I 0.00 I
171 159S-400-060 IEXEMPT ICITY OF DtULA VISTA 1 0.00 I O.DD I
172 1595-030-015 IEXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA J 0.00 I 0.00 I
173 1595-030-016 IEXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA I 0.00 1 0.00 I
174 1595-030-017 (EXEMPT ICITY OF CllJLA VISTA I 0.00 I O.DD I
175A 1595-035-020 ITDWNHOME PROOUCT IFN PROJECTS. IIC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. I 2.239.816.32 I 1.939.738.38 I
1758 1595-035-020 ICONOO PRODUCT IFW PROJECTS. INC C\O THE BALDI/IN CD. 782.084.20 I 1.020.411.30 I
176 1595-030-010 IEXEMPT ICITY OF CllJLA VISTA 0.00 I O.DD I
177 1595-030-010 IEXEMPT ICITY OF CllJLA VISTA 0.00 I 0.00 I
178 I I EXEMPT IFW PROJECTS. IIC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 0.00 I O.DD I
TOTAL ASSESSMENT 5.390.424.22 5.126.364.14
H:\CLIENT\CHLAVSTA\JN202RLL.VK1
itfo
.
-
I, Beverty A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoIng
assessment, together with the diagram attached thereto, was filed in my office on
the day of , 1991.
City Clerk
City of Chura Vista
State of Califomla
I, Beverly A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing
assessment, together with the diagram attached thereto, was approved and
confirmed by the City Council of the City of Chura Vista on the day of
.1991.
City Clerk
City of Chula Vista
State of Califomia
I, John P. Uppitt, as Superintendent of Streets of said City, do hereby certify that
the foregoing assessments, together with the diagram attached thereto, was
recorded in my office on the day of ,1991.
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of Califomla
12
?/
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to
the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", must be based on the benefit
that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify
the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district
proceedings. This responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who Is rateined for
the purpose of making an analysis of the facts in determining the correct apportionment ,
of the assessment obligation.
Upon completion of this apportionment of obligation, the Assessment Engineer
makes his recommendation at the public hearing on the Assessment District, and the final
authority and action rests with the City Council after hearing all testimony and evidence
presented at the public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council
must take the final action in determining whether or not the assessment spread has been
made in direct proportion to the benefits received.
It is first necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvements will render
to the properties within the boundaries of the assessment district. The overall benefit
derived by the properties within the proposed boundary of the assessment district is the
construction of the public improvements, which will enable the properties to develop. The
public improvements have been previously itemized within Part II, Estimate of Costs and
relate to the following:
1. East "H" Street from Eastlake Drive to Mt. Miguel Road.
2. State Route 125 bisecting the Salt Creek I Project Area.
3. Mt. Miguel Road from its terminus approximately 1500' south of East "H" Street, north
to Proctor Valley Road.
4. Proctor Valley Road from Mt. Miguel westerly and northerly out of Salt Creek I into the
County of San Diego.
5. Main Infrastructure Water, Sewer, Reclaimed Water and Storm Drain traversing and
serving single family residential areas within the boundary of the District. (Reference
Exhibits A, S, C & D for infrastructure locations in the Appendix.)
The assessment method and formula is based on the ultimate land use confirmed
by approved Salt Creek I Tentative Tract Map, Tract Map No. 89-9, and recorded maps
13
12.
AcaUlsmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
for Unit 1, (Map 12827, 91-292094), Unit 2 (Map 12828, 91-292095) and Unit 3 (Map
12829,91-292096).
The properties within the assessment district boundary are currently under
development. Because of the interrelationship of the various public improvements needed
for development, the assessment district funding and construction mechanism is an
!Jfficient way to fund and construct the improvements.
Soread Method%av
Project No.1: Project Grading
Project No.2: East wHw Street
East "H" Street and State Route 125, together with other major streets, are included
within the City's Development Impact Fee program, a program for financing the major
streets in the eastern area. The total eligible DIF was quantified to be $1,381,896.00 (Page
6).
Project No. 1 grading and Project No.2 for East WH" Street is eligible within the DiF
(refer to Estimate of Costs, Project No.2). The DIF cost and the District allocation costs
attributed to Proctor Valley Road and Mt. Miguel Road, since their inherent benefit to the
future parcels Is essentially to that of providing transportation facilities.
The benefit to the properties within this program Is that through each property's
participation, it attains its share of capacity In the eastern area circulation $treet system.
Since these facilities are a part of this program, we are applying the same methodology
for benefit that was used in the formulation of the Development Impact Fee program.
Therefore, the assessment levy against each parcel equals the amount of the
Development Impact Fee.
The above will be spread upon the average dally traffic generation rates and
equivalent dwelling unit factors as established by the DIF Transportation Program within
Table 1, as follows:
14
93
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
TABLE 1
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES
AND EQUIVALENT DWEWNG UNIT FACTORS
ADT jDay
Land Use Density 'per DU Der AC .EI:lll
Single Family Detached
0-2 10
2-4 10
4-6 10
6-8 10
8-10 10
11-19 8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Single Family Attached
0.8
$oread Methodoloav
Project No.3: State Route 125 (SR 125)
Project No.8: Storm Drain System
It is proposed that SR 125 and the Storm Drain System (Exhibit "D") be financed
by the assessment district against parcels which receive the special benefit from the street
related improvements. The amount of the assessment against each parcel Is directly
related to the average daily traffic generation or the usage of the streets Indicated on
Table No.1. Justification of the need for these improvements Is contained In the
development project's Environmental Impact Report, tract map conditions, the
Transportation Phasing Plan for the eastem territories and Eastem Area Development
Impact Fee (DIF).
State Route 125 Is a major transportation facility required for construction to
provide a circulation system which will accept the cumulative number of trips generated
by new development in the eastem area of the City of Chula Vista. Through the
construction of East "H" Street (OIF) and State Route 125, another link in the overall major
15
Cf"/
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
street network is completed, thereby providing additional capacity in the overall circulation
network.
The Storm Drain System for these major transportation facilities has been allocated
from a storm drain system designed to mitigate the storm water generated from the Salt
Creek Ranch. The Storm Drain System specifically serving East "H" Street has been
allocated by Wilson Engineering In their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
system and Its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt Creek
I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District.
The Estimate of Costs, contained hereinbefore, reconciles the Development Impact
Fees for eligible DIF infrastructure. Other Items of construction and incidentals which
were not eligible for DIF credits were made a part of this assessment district. Those.
costs are to be spread to the properties benefitted using the ADT factors as noted in
Table 1.
The addition of applicable incidentals and financing costs were added to the DIF
for a total spread amount to the properties participating in the DIF.
Soread Methodoloav
Project No.4: Water System
The Water System is comprised of two pressure zone areas -710 and 980, as
defined by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
water system and Its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt
Creek I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District. Therefore,
the construction cost for the water system has been assigned to these benefitting areas
by their allocation percentage (Wilson Report, page two, within Appendix). Only those
costs assigned to the District are to be spread to the benefitted parcels.
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
"Land Use Tvee
Single Family Residential, Detached
Assianment
Condominium, Residential
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Townhouse, Residential
Project No.5: Reclaimed Water
The Reclaimed Water System to be included in the District consists of only the 16-
inch reclaimed transmission main. The total system consists of both 8-inch and 16-inch
transmission mains. These facilities are located within East "H" Street, Proctor Valley
Road and Mt. Miguel Road. As with the Water System, the costs of this project have
been allocated between the District and other benefitting areas. Per page four of the
Wilson Report -as previously cited- the cost sharing for the Reclaimed Water Facilities
are defined as applicable to the District.
The utility of this system is of benefit to the entire District area for its erosion,
irrigation and landscape maintenance. Since the Reclaimed Water System will serve vital
erosion control and appurtenant slope maintenance, in combination with the landscaping
amenities, the spread allocation will be the same methodology used for the roadway
projects. This benefit assignment will be based upon trip generation assignment by 'and
use as defined in Table 1.
Project No.6: Sewer System
Project No.7: Offslte Sewer - Proctor Valley Road
The number of units benefitting from the Sait Creek Ranch were estimated based
upon the latest SPA Plan and confirmed by recorded maps within the Sait Creek I area.
As with the Water System and the Reclaimed Water System, the Sewer System proposed,
including the variable diameter Offsite Sewer proceeding from the District Boundary
northerly within Proctor Valley Road into the County of San Diego, has been allocated
17
GiS
as It serves and benefits the District. Only those costs allocated to the District shall be
spread to the benefitting parcels.
Historical wastewater generation factors for the land uses within the District have
previously been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units In the NBS-Lowry Wastewater
Subarea Master Plan, May, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for
the Sewer .System:
Land Use Tvoe
EDU Asslonment
Single Family Residential, Detached
Townhouse, Residential
Condominium, Residential
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
The cost of incidentals has been spread proportionately aver the various
improvements in the direct proportion that the improvement bears to the total cost of
Improvements for both the DIF eligible and non-DIF eligible Improvements.
In conclusion, It is my opinion that the assessments for Assessment District No.
90-1 are spread in direct accordance with the benefits that the land within the district
boundary receives from the works of improvements.
Dated:
Muni Fmancial Servlcas, Inc.
~/!~
David Keltner, P.E.
Director, Special District Servlcas
18
9?P
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART N -ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
BOUNDARY MAPS AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS are on file In the offices of the
City Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets. Reduced copies of these maps are
contained hereinafter.
19 q7
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( IALT CREEK I )
,\ FOIITHI
\ " CITY OF CHULA VISTA
'..... "~TY OF lM_ao, ITATI OF ~OIUlA
" ----------------
......- ...~. -- ----
1HEET10F.
I
I
I
.J
. . . . . . .
=.
i,
I
i I
_APtIIC ICALI
~
...,.
-_._'"
.
.
.
.
.
/
/
/
/
/ /
/ /
/ /
~ I /
I I
I I
I I
I I
Ib. I
I ~I// I
I.. I
11):/
110- I
lIlT I
I I
/ I
, I / LEGEND
......./ I
~" I ______
)~...("
'"' &:: "
/ ""'4'
"
8
VICINITY MAP
--
h ..~)~:~:~: :
--...-
.." ... tNP.........
..,. ..............
-. ..-..---
-
._...~"---_.....
..~"'"...,."..c__._._......
__ _.. ___ _... "'6-'
........---,..-.... ...
-......_--~--
.........ftII.~1 _..........
~'W.~,..-~'~___.-A===
&:._r ._........,._.._
~ww.~_--......__
---
--
@
I" @)wj
.....-. -.......
....... .......
....... .......
....... ......
........ -.-.....
--
-----------.
--
_._......_...--._~..
-........--.....- -
...---.---.
MFS
(i)
-----..-- .,
-~-.........----. ....
.. NIUCW. ..vaca. ...
-..-
--
~ ........ ....
- ....-
lift...... ....
-- 4~_ ....,-......
:.=... .. .........M...
~_.~....__ftA.
--
...
-. ..---..
~;::..
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( IALT CREEK J )
'011_
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COIIIITY 01' IAII ..00. ITA TI 01' CAUFOIIIIA
8IEET 2 OF .
_ VM.YY_
.' ---
1'::-:':-:':-:-:"
, ........
.:::~:.> .! @! @! @! @! @! @! @! @! @! @!.
c.. .... I
. ..... @ I
.. ...... !@ @!@!@!@!@!@!@ @
.
.
.
I
I
....-if'...-.
.,."
I
@ I I
-
@
-
@ I :
-
@
- ~ I
I
I
I
_APHtC .CALI
~T
.......
,_._"
-
...,...
~ITY MAP
.....
UGEND
---- --
--
MFS
IS --
IiiEIill --
... iIIIJIMCIIM. ...... ...
-..-
--
~ ........ .....
..... ....-
-- ---..
ASSESSMENT ~AGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( IALT CREEK J )
--
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
~ OF 1M _00. IUTI OF CAUFO.....
-.rIOI'I
..~.~.... ....~....
.. ... ...... . . . . . . .. .
. :::.:::.:::::.:.::-:.::..:.:.:.:::: @) @)
',"::..' .............. ..:....:..:....:..:. --- ---
@) @) @
---
@
-
-
... ... .........
....... ...... ... ..... ...
IIIVERCREEK COURT
@
-
......" .... ...........
... .......... .... .... .......
....... ." ..... . .........
.... .....". ......
......... ....
@
-
..
.
......... ..... .
.. ". '..
... : : ....: 8.::..:.:: .:::': .
.. . ....... . @) @) @)
. ..... ......... "............ . ::.' ...... --- -- --
......... ........
.... ...." ..............
"..... ....... ...
....... ..
. . . . . . . .
..
&
.
I
,
. . . . . . . . . .
mlNlTY MAP
.. ....
LEGEND
MFS
--
_ ICALI
~J T
'.""1
__."n'
------
.............~-.
-..-
---
'f___ .~.... ....
'"" -..-
@ --
~ --
--- ----
~()
.\
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
C IALT CREEK I )
FOR TIE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
~ OF IAII .00. ITAT!! OF CALP_
-.n.OF'
@
-
8 !
-
.. I
. @>
.. - I ..
i 8 .
..
I . - i
c
. 8
I - I
i
8
, -
@
I -
8
-
_lIUTa...
.... ....
..................
~1N1TY MAP
.......
I.IGEND
_ ICALI
~".,.
.......
.-.-"
---- --
--
MFS
e --
"'8'''''1 --
.. ~ ...,..., ...
-..-
--
'--* ....... .....
'"" -..-
-- ---...
ItJI
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT mSTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK J )
1'011 TIll
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CCMITY OF 1M .-co. ITATI 01' CAWOIINIA
.APtIO KALa
'~
.---
.-.....
mlNlTY MAP
-...
LEGEND
---- --
MFS
e --
"''',,'1 --
... NWtOIAL ....... ....
......-
--
T---. ........ __
, --
--- -..-...
I
.
ij
I.
Ii .
I
@>
- .
I
.
.
I
.
.
--~
--
'IJ~
~'OF'
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART V - DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The general description of work to be acquired by this Assessment District consists
of the following:
1. East "H" Street: (proposed right-of-way to vary from 104' to 152') from Eastlake
Drive to Mt. Miguel Road; including, but not limited to, grading, street improvement,
water, sewer, storm drain, telephone, electricity, gas, landscaping and related
appurtenant structures.
2. STATE ROUTE 125: Project grading, excavation and slope stabilization within SAN
DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC (SDG&E) easement adjacent to an existing SOO&E
Tower No. 10, grading and wall construction.
3. Mt. Miguel Road (proposed 88' right-of-way): from Proctor Valley Road to
approximately 1500' south of East "H" Street, 44' right-of-way to include
grading, water, sewer, storm drain, and related appurtenant structures.
4. Proctor Valley Road (San Diego County, varying 60' right-of-way) to include
grading, water, and related appurtenant structures.
5. Offslte Sewer: Within Proctor Valley Road: Facility varies in diameter from 10",
12", 15", approximately 9819' linear feet proceeding from the within the District (the
City of Chula Vista) then exiting northwesterly within Proctor Valley Road into the
County of San Diego.
6. Main Infrastructure Water, Sewer, Reclaimed Water and Storm Drain traversing and
serving single family residential home areas within the boundary of the District.
20
/1)3
.
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
. RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The undersigned, David R. Keltner, hereby acknowledges that the following is all true and
correct.
At all times herein ;mentioned, the undersigned was, and is the authorized representative
or Muni Financial Services, Inc., the duly appointed Assessment Engineer of the City or
Chula VISta, California.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions or the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code or the
State or California for the construction and acquisition or certain public improvements in
a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND ACKNOWLEDGES AS FOLLOWS:
x
a. That all easements, rights-or-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works or improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession or the City.
b. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works or improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession or the City, EXCEPT FOR
THOSE DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "P attached hereto, showing maps of
rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time.
Muni Financial Services, Inc.
rPf~
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
21
IC'f
.,~
..-0(.
to.."..
_ae.....
I~IO 'r
....,.,
.-.-""
VICINITY MAP
oiO.....
MFS
.. fIIeAIICIIM. ........ ....
..." .. ...
---
T....... . hit.... ....
.....-.-
EXHIBIT
... F "
LEGEND
---- ~-
--
@ --
I::EJ --
- ---...
8
YJ
..
~
..
;
Ii
.
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Preliminary approval by the City Council of the City of Chura Vista on the
day of
.1991.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
Final approval and confirmation by the City Council of the City of Chura Vista on
the
day of
,1991.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
22
lib
=
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
RESOLUTION OF PROCEEDINGS
(TO BE INSERTED)
23
1()7
-
.
ACQUISmON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPENDIX
24
I()~
.,
..
d"Yb~.
.
..
. i!
.
() c~
,(I)
'>
~ !::(I)
"- !Sa:
:cw
I- )(~
we
~
,
,
,
,
,
\
, \
" '
" '
", '"~' /~/ E#"
..., , / '
" ", I
" ....../ "
" ..Lf(, "
, ,.;s- (
I A.T" ,
,'~"'" "
" ot..'tI ,., "
'V,' "
,
. I
lIill
- ..- Z ,. 1111
I!
!! 11'
I i I;~
I
I(),? .I.
g: ;Ijl
::E.U
.
-
-
--
.
-
2
w
I-
(I)
>-
,(I)
.
IDII:
: w
1-1-
_C
m~
%Q
Xw
w2
-
C
-'
()
W
II:
--I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
,
,
I
,
I
I
~
~
I.
I
I
I
1
I
I
I .
.1
I
I
,
I
I
I
,
,
/.
I.
l I
I
I
.
OYOH 13na,W '1,.
"tRY.
o
"
I-
~
, "
,
\
, ,
'x.. i III
... I;,'
',-,I <if ,
1'(
/ ~ '
I ..."f'r-.
"V/ ...
I
I
I
.,- :z I ." nill
I I I! I I fU'
!! I
. . " I
I I-I-
I I
lIb ~!rI
:=:!UJI
-
.. ..
. ..
~a:
. . . . . III III
b~~
. en w
0 . >
. ... m m
. . (I) - w
Ie a:...
. . "'- ::cw-
. . )(~m
. . I- w wit
. mo
.
"
"
,
\
,
" I
',~ It#',
",-, "... /.Ii; "
" ... IQ'"'
" ...../ I
" .L~ /
, ""'" (
) ~'i' '-
" ~ '"
" I. ~ ,'.''''',
"V, ,
~~Uf I
---
"I:b
B niB
I i
,,- z .t
- I I! I ! Iou
!!
","" I !
IIDI-
I ~III.
11/ dO. '
:Euh
I I ~
.
. .
-- ~
G'tOH "EnDIN 'J.N -- '\I
--1 .
. . oJ'
I .>
I pm
.
0 ~~
-<
~ I!
" ::i~
cc
~ 0
~
m
I
I
I
I
., ,,' ,
<T 'x I l4I
. ~./"'~ ,,/ I ~ I
. If ~ 'Y"-JI ~/
:::-" <c,1
') ~(
I ~ '
/ ...~ r-.
..." "
I
I "1
III i
'" z III
- I f
I I DC)
I ~.....
lOl- I
I g;d.
I/~ .1,.
~u.! .
..
~
II
~
II
II
III
II
.
.
.
I
I
.
I
I
.
.
I
.
Table 2
Water Deand FlCtOn
LmdUse EDU'.
RelidcatW, Smile FUJlily n...~h~ 1,01 du
RelidcatW,. CoadomiDiums .11 du
RelidcatW, "10._..\. .71 du
ReIaiI 7.11 ICI'e
0.... -rcial 5.61 ICI'e
lDdustrial 5.61 ICI'e
Qurcb 2.01 lite
Clubhouse 7.81 ICre
Visitor'. Caller 7.81 ICI'e
Pipe sizes and water demand factors for the 980 system were taken from the NBS
Lowry Warer Subarea MasTer Plan, February 23, 1990. The Black and Vatcb Olay
Warer Dislrict BenefiT Analysis, April 16, 1990, was used in conjunction with the
NBS Lowry Repon to determine the extent of oversizing in the system. Funding for
the 980 system through Assessment District 90-3 includes the installation cost of the
minimum sized pipe necessary to service the EastLake Development only.
JSSIJANETIfJ<<JOO.X1J_ 20. J9PJ
38
1/3
.
.
WilSON- ENGINEERING
WATER · WASTEWATER. ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SALT CREEK I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
COST SHARING ANALYSIS
Iii
703 PALOMAR AIAPOAT ROAD. sum: 300 . ~!U.SBAD. CA II2DOII . till) 438 1122
:
Salt Creek I Assessment District Cost ShariDg Analysis
lor Water ud Sewer Facilities
~":'::Ii$tt>>~::>::,x::;::N::':~:;;:::::~:;::':::<<:'-::;::::';;$::::::~$!: :~;~::;~::'::;:: :::~:::;::,;::~:;:;~::~~::i::::~r:;::::t# ~~
t,. ',[FKlbtf,"'''''W ""'')ldi'lji;f'" .
- . '~s:AL'rm' . ''''''SinH'' Oth* .~ "'!f0t8l' . .. .....'....jij+
i~'it~I~\;1i ~~'*OOij~.' .. "U ";.,"':
,.d....,'...........". ... M'.""
":: .~:.;.;.;.;....~.. ..::::*.$<<ifK~...... ..~:<;.,.:.w t#tiJV&W ?/1~:;~~ i1rL:::.:~,~:~:;d K:: ...::.::::;t1%f -:.. '.~,::.>> ,..:_.:.: .JiM
::,::: ,~'::='~K:. .,::::<~,.:~.,.~ .:,>;~.:4:. <~::::,.. .A:::::;.;:;:
PRocroR VALLEY ROAD
10' Gmity S- LiDe $6,468 S50 632 0 1,I82 47'J(,
12" Water IlDc, 7IO 15",1m 169 0 300 469 36%
Zoue . .
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
98JJ/7IO PRS a 16" $21,294 169 0 6SS 824 21%
Water IlDc, 98JJ Zoue
(N. ol East H SL)
16" Water IlDc, 98JJ 167,soo 381 300 0 681 56%
Zoue (S. ol East H SL)
Subtotal SII4,794
10" Gravity S- LiDe S3O,03O 381 2S3 0 634 60%
EAST "II" STREET
16" Water IlDc, 98JJ S175,530 S50 600 355 1,S05 37%
Zoue "
../
12" Water IlDc, 7IO 194,715 169 0 300 469 36%
Zoue
Subtotal S270,245
WATER LINES THROUGH SFD
10' a 12" Water S119,476 169 0 15 244 'I09f,
IJ:aes, 7IO Zoae
SEWER LINES THROUGH SFD
s- a 10' Graw S98,064 4S4 632 0 1,086 42%
Sewer lJDes
Or~~ljJ:, PROCI'OR VAlLEY 3nAK
10' Gmity S- LiDe $190,000 S50 632 612 1,794 31%
12" Gmity S- LiDe ST/IXXJ S50 632 802 1,984 28%
15" Gmity Seer Liae ~'~IXXJ S50 632 l,642 2,824 20%
Subtotal 1487 f.1VI
t~:TOT1L~~fr.l~;1;I~i.~~~iii. ;~:~~:r~~I~~~ ilifili~;:i~t~ff1fM1)f{ ;:;-:.I,'If.: ;:f :u,:: .:i.}W1\%t*: !~I;~&~iili .:;t;f;t%#i~i~l~111titl
.,.:.
.-, ...-.-.-....
115
.
Liz Long
August 2, 1991
Page 4
,BWaimed Water .FaeilltJes
The reclaimed water facilities to be included in the assessment district consist
of 8 and 16-inch reclaimed water transmission mains. For purposes of
determining the percent share of these facilities attributable to Salt Creek I, an
oversizing methodology was utilized. At this time, there is no a~curate way to
establish the benefitting areas outside of Salt Creek I based on the projected
demand.
The oversizing methodology calculates the Salt Creek I share for all
tral15mission mains greater than 8-inches in diameter based on the unit
construction cost; the unit construction cost for 8-inch ACP class 200 is $21 per
lineal foot and 16-inch ACP class 200 is $35 per lineal foot. Th'e following table
summarizes the reclaimed water facilities cost sharing analysis.
Cost Sharing Summary tor Reclaimed Water Facillties
EAST'a'STREET
16' Reclaimed Water Line
$185,945
60%
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
16' Reclaimed Water Line
$105,325 60%
$39,215 60%
$24,808 100%
$64,023
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
16' Reclaimed Water Line (N. or Ealt -H' St.)
8' Reclaimed Water Line (5. or Eut 'H' St.)
Subtotal
RECLAIMED WATER LINE THROUGH SFD
S' Reclaimed Water Line
$11,472
lih
tTOTnJtlli.~~tt~~t~~tfmt[~mt~~~t~j~~~f~~~!~i:~ftI1#f!~i~:[~~: :~rf.J{,.~S366;7'6S,'::%~~tf:'
. ., . .
-.
Liz Long
August 2, 1991
PageS
Storm Drain Faeflltles
The McIntire Group, Inc. provided the information to determine the cost split
of storm drain facilities. The calculations in the appendix present the cost
estimate of storm drain facilities required for East -H- Street without the
development of Salt Creek I. The following table provides a cost comparison
with the estimated construction cost of the proposed facilities (with Salt Creek
I):
Storm Drain Cost Comparison
lj~lili'ii;i!iB;ilifl!iiii>~i;;~lliijlitli 1~II~JfNil:1
$347,901
$152,190
56%
1 Prepared by McIntire Group, Inc. (See Appendix)
The Salt Creek I share was determined by taking the difference between the
costs with and without development and dividing by the estimate with
development of the Salt Creek I project.
1/7
WILSON ENGINEERING
:SA~r C~U~ .I
"""S~E.Sfl ""EJJT
/)nsr..,..r
CAt.c.u.....17.....~
I"C-t
w..rlA.
r"",,,, f"fC
Ti-.. ".,..,.A-CrlU::
-- I~"",U nlCo ...c.c... N."J"U
O~
SA."r c..CC.... = INC'"....~ IN
.",~ ,. OrHCA..,S"
c:.Arz:..",.. '''' nitS 4.a~ c.~r. r,;;,S __ IS
A c.Q,.,. ."oJ'" rl,,~...,
4.10--' c.~r''''Ar. C,. ''''E Ac_owr'P
W'T7hN
"'~
o no. W..r&;o. D/S"',er 1N",ell
...,-
tJ,"n""NrE~.,
..",."r ,."'.'" "",I'
SA.., G..ce_ Z _Qs.,...
I,JAr-.
""'CII., "'-fl. As s"......'" / "",$ ......._ 1$ Q",,~~~
BLn.-tn.oJ
"<c:
"/0 ._
--
'9.0 .....4
."s_ .,...
E..C."....-.I .
"'c.
"'''''''''.6,>05
(13''1 /. _> _..__.. "'
, ,
6.,..,...... P....... ............. "Cor
CI..s'WJ~'
-
,.,-- :
~V,,,.
t:!E:. l....N&J "'05 & A_A v,..,'r~
'3 c:. 1:# ... M or Let.... Slf~ {.S
'''I ~ID""""'- "0 IfC.- 180
{ z......._
15 "ItS '0 """'If... Zoo 1fC. I&,O
( 9."'-.)
'" 1fCI;.S,... ""1.- 1$ "c" '0
(., .",..c.I
17 .QUI.6J"--" 'to If C- 80
12. -,...)
1'1 AA:.'."""'~ 15 Ac:. 30
(at"'llf ..)
"1C.6 ~.......... - z.
"""sc. 78
(o.S ...,...) . 15c."c..
TOT7'tt.- ~~5 "-''1'7 HS;
~S'7z.a I 7tf1f4 I ::5A....r CIIA-c... .r As:~~.s,,*c,.JT DIST>>,cr .I'"7/'s/" I '1.
.oa "0 ,. su,,,rCT D..rf IMUT"O
WILSON ENGINEERING
.s",,",,, Gt,~ .r AfSeQ,..,.,r /:)'s'1"Ir.'''~ C.A'-Gs' lu","'~
7;.es ~
~S5 ~,~ Muar ~tf".J II. ""A",~
D'V'DC/:>
l5en.-c..,.., T'HC '/0 __ _ ",c
980 2aN..
1._D No
1'3
I~
15
II.
17
I<:J
~S
M loSe..
v,.."",..~
7'0 2,.,""4 ~ec .....L 1C7'")of<-
~5 0 ~S
,"0 /2-0 180
1'f0 ~o "0
0 6:10 '0
0 eo 80
0 .50 .50
0 3- Z.
!os If! 78
3 00 ""<rJ 355 _.rr ~:55 __.~,
71;)119"'5
NDre
,"" TJtc
T7frIIr ON '-'7
,10 ="".
:2.6.,.
01' F7Je
~oo (J~.~
""ICE
A.sS"... ~
~ .c-,...~
" ;to,..,
I'H€
10 _". 1''1.. -,""eN loJ..r~ ".""'~ TltHow..
me
s,,,,,c./..& ~'"''
~el/iE...o ~~s,Jr.
T /irS ,~ IIcc"",,.
THE /0....... 12. -_CrI . _. 1.,,..,tI~ ~OVID. ,If
I-Do I"6Q
o'S.,.:sr.,.. ....... r7M $....1/,.." __I..~ ___
DO ~Or lI~o!,..r ~. -- _P7I ~ O"'tlc.....r
~S 7Pf, "::;,.c,,,,r,~ .- c.... T H Sr - S_ ,Nflt.II", ;;.
&<I5'7~ I -NA4 r ..s.o..r G.u.,.... r Asscss"M.,.,r l),sr..,cr 1..,;,-;" I z'h.
~I'J:II IOn , -"- T .,. ..~--
". :-.
'SA~fi' ~~ll: ..
; ...,r,'MRCH. EEf< ./
.'~- ",. ;: "
.. I
I
.
\
\. '. "
m.ST.
1;
.-:
. ,f\.
: J :'
..
.
'.
..-
'.
,.
~.,
<- J .
.,. (
,,;
\
,
I
..'
~.." .
'-::'f\ ....
1;L1\
,fV \
, i
..
.. .
<<:\
..,
.
.
I
7/u/U
I
i
I
I
I
!
STORK DRADl COST COHPAlU:SON
FOR EAST _!I" SDEET
I
.
i
.
S'!'O:RM >>RA.IN CoST
WI1'HOtTr SALT cu:::::t :r
DEVEtOPH!N'l'
.....".
I"'"' I
--- f
.
Qmlrr.:.:::\!
UNIT
- ---------
18" Rq
i
21" ltCi'
I
,
30" RC!'
!
. .
42" RCf
I
IiINGWALLS
I
cmm~
680 U
650 U'
-
lS0'U
.330 LF
4 :::ACB
i
CLEANOporS
,
I
LTp 1W'
I
r
8 EACH
Ii EACH
80 CY
I
I
i
j
I
;
i
.
i
.
!
,. PlUPlllUD
.
,
.
I
I
I
.
,
I
I
.
0Nr1'
COST TOTAL
.....4_____ ... .
I
$43.00 $29,240
I
$4S.00 $29,250
$65.00 $9,7S0 I
$75.00 $24,750 I
I
$2,500.00 $10,000
I
$3,500.00 $28,000 I
$3,000.00 $18,000
$40.00 $3,200
1'OTAL: $lS2,190 I
By 71ft! ,A-{JtJrJIU G~GfI~ I INc..
J~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
02..2
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution
north curb
Avenue.
Meeting Date 10-22-91
.I~ ~~~ Adopting a no parking area along the
1 ine of "E" Street between First Avenue and Third
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public
WOrkSJ ~
REVIEWED BY:
City Managert:?
(4/5ths Vote: Yes__No~)
Staff has recei ved requests from area res i dents to add a two-way 1 eft-turn
lane on "E" Street to improve traffic flow and safety. In order to accomplish
that, parking needs to be prohibited on the north side of "E" Street.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt the resolution prohibiting parking
on "E" Street between First and Third Avenues and install ing a two-way turn
1 ane.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At the Safety Commission meeting on
September 12, 1991, the Safety Commission voted 5-1-1 to approve staff's
recommendation that the City install a two-way left turn lane on "E" Street.
At the Towne Centre Project Area Committee meet i ng of October 3, 1991, the
Committee voted 7-0 to concur with staff's recommendation.
DISCUSSION:
E Street is a 64 foot wide east/west Class I Collector. There are two lanes
in each direction. Traffic is separated by double yellow centerline striping
and parking is allowed along both curblines.
Traffic counts conducted by staff show that there were approximately
20,000-22,000 vehicles per day on E Street between Third Avenue and First
Avenue before SR-54 opened in December 1990. Traffic volumes are now
17,000-21,000 vehicles per day and will ultimately increase to 25,000-30,000
due to developments in the Bayfront and Woodlawn areas.
A review of our accident history from January 1, 1988 until the end of August
1991, a period of over 3-1/2 years show 34 rear-end accidents. out of 90 total
accidents (38%). Sixteen accidents were reported between First Avenue to
Second Avenue, 12 were rear ends. From Second Avenue to Third Avenue 24
acci dents were reported, 13 were rear end acci dents. The proposed stri pi ng
plan is expected to reduce the number of rear end coll isions and improved
traffic flow.
The recent resurfacing of E Street from First Avenue to Fifth Avenue provides
an inexpensive opportunity to change the striping pattern between First and
Third Avenue to create a continuous two-way left turn lane. Staff's
recommendation would prohibit parking on one side, similar to the striping
pattern on F Street between Third Avenue and Fourth Avenue. To accommodate
this change, parking has to be removed on the north side of the street.
,;.~ -/
Page 2, Item .l;J..
Meeting Date 10-22-91
Removi ng the parki ng on the north side is recommended because restri ct i ng
parking on the north side will require the removal of less parking spaces.
There are 37 parking spaces which would be eliminated along the north curbline
of E Street. Fourteen (14) parking spaces would be el iminated between Second
and Third Avenues. Twenty-three (23) parking spaces would be eliminated
between Second and First Avenues. Parking will still be allowed along the
south side. There are 38 parking spaces along the south curbline, 16 west and
22 east of Second Avenue, respectively. Staff can add up to six addit i ona 1
parking spaces on the south side. The two-way left-turn pocket will decrease
delay, improve traffic flow in the area and most importantly enhance traffic
safety.
At the Town Centre Project Area Committee (TCPAC) meeting of October 3, 1991,
the Committee voted unanimously to concur with staff's recommendation. In
addition, three parking meters will be removed in front of the Plumbing Store
and one across the street. None of the affected businesses expressed any
concern for the removal of these four metered parki ng stall s. The Pl umbi ng
Store does have a 14 stall parking lot in the rear and the el imination of
on-street parking will increase visibility when exiting the parking lot.
The following alternatives were considered by staff:
1. Two-wav 1 eft turn 1 ane Fi rst Avenue - Thi rd Avenue: The two-way 1 eft
turn 1 ane wi 11 allow motori sts to pull into the pocket to make a 1 eft
turn without interruption of traffic flow in the street.
The benefit of this alternative is that it will allow motorists
, travel i ng eastbound on "E" Street to make 1 eft turns into the dri veways
on the north side of "E" Street without caus i ng foll owi ng traffi c to
stop. Forcing motorists to come to unexpected stops results in a safety
problem as evidenced by the fact that during the last 3-1/2 year period
34 rear end accidents have occurred on "E" Street between Third Avenue
and First Avenue. A disadvantage of putting a two-way left lane is that
it will require the removal of the parking along the north side.
2. Two-wav left turn Second Avenue - Third Avenue: This alternative is the
same as above, but two-way left turn lane would be from Second Avenue to
Third Avenue only, leaving the existing striping between First Avenue
and Second Avenue. The advantage of thi s a lternat i ve is keepi ng the
on-street parking spaces between First Avenue to Second Avenue which
most residents want to retain the parking in front of their residences.
The disadvantage is that a two-way left turn lane is most needed in the
100 block of "E" Street due to the sag vertical curve which has a
centerl ine grade of almost eight percent. Vehicles attempting to turn
left across opposing traffic, bring traffic behind them to stand still
sometimes causing rear-end accidents.
.Jc).-~
Page 3, Item .2:L
Meeting Date 10-22-91
3. Painted Center Median: It consists of set of double-double yellow
centerl ine four foot wide. It will be painted continuously from Third
Avenue to First Avenue with breaks at each intersection. The benefit of
this alternative is that it will eliminate midblock left turns which
will then reduce rear-end accidents in midblock areas. This will keep
the existing parking. The disadvantage is people still can physically
but ill ega lly make 1 eft turns at each intersect i on whi ch wi 11 still
bring traffic to a standstill and will not reduce accidents at those
locations.
4. Raised Center Median: A four foot wide asphalt median between Second
Avenue and Minot Avenue was also considered. the median would prohibit
left turns across opposing traffic. On-street parking would be
reta i ned, except near Mi not Avenue if a 1 eft turn lane is to be added.
Up to 15 parki ng spaces woul d be lost near thi s intersect ion. 1 f the
median at Minot Avenue parallels the centerline stripe, then no parking
spaces would be lost. The cost for a 700 ft., 4-foot wide median is
estimated at $20,000.
There have been 10 reported accidents in this area, 7 which were
rear-end accidents. The raised median would reduce the number of
accidents, especially since this portion of E Street is built as a sag
vert i ca 1 curve wi th the low poi nt bei ng mi d-way between Second Avenue
and Minot Avenue. The sight distance in this area is reduced due to the
sag vertical curve.
Accident History - 1/1/88 to 8/31/91
Total Rear End
5 2
36 2
4 4
2 1
10 7
1 1
4 3
3 0
5 5
1) First Avenue & "E" Street
2) Second aVenue & "E" Street
3) Between First Avenue & Alpine/Minot Avenue
4) Between Alpine/Minot Avenue and Minot Avenue
5) Between Minot Avenue & Second Avenue
6) Between Second Avenue & Twin Oaks Avenue
7) Between Twin Oaks Avenue & Del Mar Avenue
8) Between Del Mar Avenue & Church Avenue
9) Between Church AVenue & Third Avenue
Because of the numerous driveways and intersections in the 100 and 200 block
of E Street, the two-way 1 eft turn 1 ane plan is cons i dered to be the most
beneficial alternative. Therefore, staff is recommending the prohibition of
parking along the north curbline of E Street from First Avenue to Third Avenue
to allow for the implementation of the continuous left turn lane.
All area residents and businesses have been notified of tonight's City Council
meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 5744E
Attachments: Area Plat
E Street Striping Plan
Minutes Safety Commission dated 9-12-91
,2.2 -3 />>.-~
-
-
-
. ~-
I': l' <<tt,jff~.c~,
h .d:I.l~ ~
IJ J, ~ ~ .J
I,j.... . I ~ ~
I~ 0 .1.' ""' I
Cl)w
- z
-a::4~
- 101 CZI~
"" 0 ,
- J I/) _, .
~ 0 '0' .
I. a:, .
- .
I ~ -""'- -, _
oJ · .u.", J../ "
..J r::; ....~.,^
.... "-~
"
-.,-
I
-,
-.J .. ...
.. ....
- - ....
... I"" .
t:' ... o,
, , ;'.......:.
" -i... ~ _
III)
J. - '0.
0"
..J ":.E.-
.... . - '"'
l=i :;; ::'. ..~
~~ uuffi.:i:: @
~ 1:1 '
,'0 ~u
LLI.I. - t> ..... 1/ _ _
.-- . ': '<C:.V ~ .-- ,
,- r;;;d;~ ,- L' _ HI
I '--11-" fi '::II J f""\ "
" ~ 1ZJ= ~;:::
1.1.1 11. 1 J.{. ~I
1.J..I'r j::'w. '. -1 ~,
,f)[WPr '~~
1 IJ-n ~~ _~.~
- ......,"'" t'" .. ... ~
~'" r~ n't! . ~ i!l '
~. -, ", " .L.
r ~' · I -' '0"00>. ',....
. 1) r ~ · >n">~v:..:. I ;;:;= "'1
· ... · '. ..',- · r'r '
--...... ",' h_ t=. I
: ' , : : : ~ t.. ... lr:=..1....
i '1 · "L. r-..J. . .......
I I I . --~ I. , . 0 I .1 ..
:i> \1',,, ~~'N':" ~ . , '::::: :::: r.!.'
-'-- -" I ~ '~<:'"' . : .... ." " ,u, =
-:I'~ ?; -\. - ~ f1-:J 1= ~ · It:; 1 r-, r....-.:..
,. - ~ [::... "'.11 , : 'r, "0 .>0. .._
~ ~~ ~'~MI' p;' ~,"'~~~ - f~i=- ~ :'
.. '. 1LlJ.'I'1' F,; ~'11;',..", L I FLu ~ '.\.~
'Ii """ Lt:
~ ~. ~"I i ,~ . -.~ J'i' : DJIII]L 1. ~I'IH2.t . ,_
41{. , ,,: I []][[[!]J[fj i lJl
" .\' ~~ I' ,J, '. ;: !!J I .it: '" iJ i :, OW'H' ,
,~~~ i ~L ,^v\. .
o . ~nH '1' I . : .
00,; 0 _ II .
I'~$~ "I 1.1. '..1
I j~ ..il : : I t J ~ ....
lL -1 .i1__
.
-. .-
I
~,;,.;i~
· .J.n
"
=
~I..J
- .
'-r-
.....,
I 1
I'
r
~r: ~
I'll rr-, I
'r
E;
'r-
1
JJ.
.
,;-00
.
.
o .
'0
~
I
1
. ,
L L
-,
- .
.
-
~
~
..I
'n.
<
W:
0:.,
<
.
.
.
~
.
S s
S
I_ .
..
~ ..
~
~ ~ -
.
.
z .-.. ~-- - ---~- . -
---_. "------
- ---
-.-..... . - - - - -- ---- -~--
I I - - I
L ._' I _ 0
, cr o '" ~I
~I= N 1- <'J
.1 -I -
I I. I I I
. I I I
I I I \
I I
I I \
1 t I, I
I I I
I
I I
. I .
I I I
- I-
I I :rIN -
N '" -:r
- - - -1- ~
:rl~ 0 '-I (0 I ~
- -
- - ..J
I I I I C\..
I I 0
.~
ci:.
'.
~
I 0:>
1 I
I 1 I I \-
I I I I ~
I '1)
I' I I ~
I I IIJ,
I .1 I
.
I I I I '1.1
I I ::.
I
I I . I
f..!J ..
I , z \ I ....
..J
- ....
<.!1 Q.. -
I I . /~ ....
:z 1- \
- 1 li) a:: J ii)
0- I t;:; I --,
- I 0>
a I \b I I I
Ii; I
z I I CO "t
I I 111.1 r- 11.1 Q.:
I CI) I I Q
3 I - . . I
( I >< C)
1.IJ I I LI I I (})
I ..
z I J ~
I I ..
,u-? "
.' . ...
1!l
SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES
Thursday, September 12, 1991
7:00 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
1. ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Braden, Co-Chair Thomas, Commissioners
Chidester, Koester, Matacia, Padilla, Pitts
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MSC (Koester/Chidester) to approve Safety Commk~ion Minutes of August 8, 1991
as presented. Approved 5-0-0-2 with Chair Braden and Commk..ioner Pitts
abstaining.
3. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None.
4. WRI'ITEN CORRESPONDENCE: None.
S. REPORT ON ADDmON OF TWO-WAY LEFT TURN LANE FOR "E" STREET
BETWEEN FIRST AND TIIIRD AVENUES.
Chair Braden told the Commission that there were citizens who wanted to respond to
staffs recommendation, but who could not attend the meeting. The following was read
into the record by Chair Braden.
Ae:ainst Staff Recommendation
Lena Martinez, 142 "E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Sherry Aguilar, President Mission Gardens Homeowners Association, 100 Block of
"E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
In Favor of Staffs recommendation
Ralph and Velma Alvine, 171 Twin Oaks Circle, Chula Vista, CA 91910
John Nerz, 145 Twin Oaks Circle, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Mrs. Dickinson, 187 Twin Oaks Circle, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Hal Rosenberg informed Chair Braden that staff received a letter from Mr. Steven
Thomas, who is Commissioner Thomas's brother. Commissioner Thomas said that he
would abstain from this item due to a possible conflict of interest with his brother.
Mr. Rivera reported that "E" Street is 64' wide and is a major east-west street. There
are two lanes striped for each direction. Traffic counts are approximately 17,720
vehicles per day. Since parking is allowed on both sides, there is no space for a two-
way left turn lane. On a street that does not allow parking, there would normally be a
left turn lane. Commissioners viewed the area plat which indicated the proposed new
striping which would add a center lane in the middle of the street. The curbside lane is
18' to 19' on the south and 14' on the north side which would have the parking
restriction. The plat also indicated the existing striping which has left turn pockets only
at First Avenue, Second Avenue, and Third Avenue. This presents problems to
.2~-?
SAFETY COMMISSION
September 12, 1991 Minutes
Page 2
motorists who live on the side streets such as Twin Oaks Circle, Alpine/Minot, Del Mar,
and Church Avenues, where when making their left turn across opposing traffic, cars
stack up behind them. There have been a number of rear end accidents on "E" Street.
From 1988 to the present, there have been 90 reported accidents and 38%, or 34
accidents, were rear end accidents. This is the type of accident which could be
eliminated with the addition of the left turn lane. A left turn lane would allow motorists
to pull out of the mainstream flow of traffic. Staff looked at the possibility of striping
this street with a continuous left turn lane and maintaining parking on both sides, but it
cannot accommodated. This is due to the width of the street. The next alternative was
to remove parking on one side. The north side, which is not as heavily used as the south
side in parking, was the better choice to make in eliminating the parking. Recently, "E"
Street was resurfaced by the Sweetwater Authority who was working on a major water
line project. There are temporary markers on the street now instead of the striping.
Commissioner Chidester asked if the traffic count was done before or after the opening
of State Route 54. Mr. Rivera said that the traffic count was conducted after the opening
of SR-54. There were approximately 20,000 - 22,000 vehicles before SR-54 opened and
now there are between 17,000 and 21,000 vehicles daily depending on which part of "E"
Street one is looking at. Counts have decreased between 10-15%.
Mr. Rosenberg indicated that staff expects the traffic on "E" Street to grow even with
the opening of SR-54. There are some development proposals in the Bayfront and
Woodlawn areas that will generate additional traffic. In ensuing years, traffic is expected
to come back to previous volumes. The estimated traffic is in the range of 25,000 -
30,000 cars per day. The goal of staffs recommendation is to make the road safer and
accommodate more cars. An example of this striping plan is on "F" Street between
Third and Fourth Avenues where parking is removed on one side.
Murphy Stumpf, 114 "E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Mr. Stumpf said that since SR-54 opened, traffic was down on "E" Street and
southbound 1-5 from SR-54 is not even open yet. Mr. Stumpf felt the City was trying
to transform "E" Street into another freeway. He said "E" Street was a residential street
and suggested the City wait for the southbound 1-5 connector to be completed so people
could learn traffic patterns and use the freeways instead of "E" Street.
Laura Grauduslius, 111 "E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Ms. Grauduslius conducted her own research since she received staffs letter. She
gathered data on how many cars parked on the north and south sides. The majority of
cars were parked in front of the Mission Garden Apartments and the semi-detached
apartments between Second and Third Avenues. She said there is adequate parking in
the Mission Garden parking lot to accommodate all the cars that were on the street. She
could fmd no reason why anybody should be parking on the south side of the street
outside the Mission Garden Apartments. From First Avenue to Second Avenue, there
were two cars parked in front of residential houses on the south side, and on the north
side there were six to eight cars parked in front of residential houses.
.2,), "'IT
SAFETY COMMISSION
September 12, 1991 Minutes
Page 3
Ms. Graudslius's house has a red curb in front of it because of a bus stop. The duplex
next door to her has a red curb for a few feet, so her family, guests, and service people
who come to her home park in front of the duplex next to her. Ms. Graudslius felt that
there had to be a way in which both residents and motorist could be winners.
William Klinkhamer, Resident Manager of complex Dl175 WE W Street, Chula Vista, Ca
91910
Mr. Klinkhamer read a letter of apposition to stafrs recommendation from Mr. Steve
Thomas, Broker/Owner of SCT properties. See attachment.
Frances Guest, 149 Twin Oaks arcle, Chula Vista, CA 91910
When Mrs. Guest first inquired about the striping, she didn't expect First to Second
Avenues to be involved. She knew the street was going to be resurfaced and wrote a
letter to the Engineering Department regarding adding a left turn lane. Mrs. Guest
explained to the Commission the trouble that motorists who live on Twin Oaks Circle
have in turning left out on to "E" Street as well as trying to turn left across "E" Street
when returning to Twin Oaks Circle. The timing of the lights make it difficult to safely
enter traffic.
Commissioner Chidester asked how many parking places are currently on the north side.
Staff indicated there are approximately 17 to 19 parking stalls between First and Third
Avenues. Since the stalls are not marked, the number varies by the way cars are parked.
On the south side, there are approximately 25 to 30 spaces.
Chair Braden asked if the parking on the north side was eliminated, was there an
alternate place for motorists to park. Mr. Rivera said that they could add approximately
six more parking spaces on the south side. Chair Braden asked if the affected residents
had their own driveway and Mr. Rivera said that most residents had their own
driveways.
Commissioner Matacia asked Sgt. Schaefer how many accidents are not reported. Sgt.
Schaefer said that was a difficult question to answer. If an accident occurs and the
motorists involved do not desire a report and there is minor damage, it is not reported.
He feels more accidents have occurred than are reflected in the statistics. Mr. Rivera
said that of the reported accidents, 2/3 were injury accidents.
Commissioner Matacia said the injury/accident rate indicated that something needed to
be done.
MSC (MatacialKoester) to accept staff's recommendation for the addition of a two-
way left turn lane on "En Street between F1rst and Third Avenues. Approved 5-1-0-
1 with Commi!;.sioner Chidester voting no and Commi!;.~ioner Thomas abstaining.
Chair Braden informed the audience that this item will go to the City Council and that
the Safety Commission's decision can be appealed there, if they wish. The citizens will
be notified by staff when this ilem will be on the Council agenda. Chair Braden granted
additional speaking time to the following people.
~.2"'1
SAFETY COMMISSION
September 12, 1991 Minutes
Page 4
Laura GraudusUus, 111 "E" Street, Chula VISta, CA 91910
Ms. Grauduslius wanted to know where are the accidents occurred. Were they at First
Avenue and "E" Street or at Second Avenue and "E" Street? She was not aware of any
accidents at First Avenue and "E" Street but only at Second Avenue and "E" Street. She
indicated that residents living on Twin Oaks or Del Mar have an alternative route using
"F" Street to get to their homes. The residents on "E" Street do not have alternate
routes. Mr. Rivera indicated that there have been accidents at every mid-block location
and every intersection along the way. There have been six at First Avenue and "E"
Street since 1988 where there is a left turn pocket. At Second Avenue and "E" Street
there have been 36 accidents and there is a left turn pocket at that intersection also.
There have been 48 additional accidents occurring where there is not a left turn lane.
Frances Guest, 149 Twin Oaks Circle, Chula VISta, CA 91910
Mrs. Guest wanted to point out that there were no residents from between Second and
Third Avenues on "E" Street to protest. Mrs. Guest felt the Commission should place
the left turn lane striping between Second and Third and discuss the rest of "E" Street
at a later date.
Commissioner Pitts requested a breakdown of accident locations. Mr. Rivera reported
the following statistics:
1) First Avenue & "E" Street - 6 accidents
2) Second Avenue & "E" Street - 36
3) Between First Avenue & Alpine/Minot Avenue - 4
4) Between Alpine/Minot Avenue & Minot Avenue - 2
5) Between Minot Avenue & Second Avenue - 10
6) Between Second Avenue & Twin Oaks Avenue - 1
7) Between Twin Oaks Avenue & Del Mar Avenue - 4
8) Between Del Mar Avenue & Church Avenue - 5
9) Between Church Avenue & Third Avenue - 5
It was pointed out that the distance between blocks is very short. It is 1,320 ft between
major streets and that would average out to approximately 400 between mid block streets.
6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Roben Smith, 744 East Naples CAJun #282, Chula VISta, CA 91911
Mr. Smith is the neighborhood watch captain for his area and was representing
approximately 200 tenants of the Sunbow Villa Apartment Complex. The complex is
located on East Naples Court which is a cul-de-sac east of Medical Center Drive.
Mr. Smith wanted to address the problem of speeding and traffic control on Medical
Center Drive. Children in the area cross Medical Center Drive from the apartment to
East Naples Street, where school buses pick them up. Both elementary and high school
students are picked up in this area. Traffic study speeds were approximately 41 mph
between 2:30 - 3:00 p.m. The speed increased to 44 mph from 3:00 - 3:25 p.m. and
also showed a 15 '!Ii increase in traffic density. This is the time that children are crossing
.2.J. ... ItJ
SEP II '" 12'21 SCT PROPERTIES
p.e2
,
}C:T.) Properties
Steven C. Thomas
Broker / Owner
(ieneral Contractor
IfProjessionalLantflortfs "
[9
.""'OD-
Item ~
September 11. 1991
Hr. Frank ~ivera
Assooiate Traffic Enaineer
City Of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910
Re: Center Turn Lane. 100-200 Block of "E" Street.
(your file #KY-119)
Dear Mr. Rivera.
I'm writins in response to your letter of September 5. 1991
whereby you indicate the Traffic and Enaineerins staff is
considering the installation of a two-way left turn lane between
First and Seoond Avenues and removal of all street parkins.
Please acoept this letter as my response AGAINST the
removal of any off street parkins to accomodate the installation
of a two-way turn lane on "B" Street between First and Second
Avenues. There are several reason why the chanees under
consideration are a bad idea: ~ 57
1). Our property located at 17~ "E" Street does not conform to
the present off street parkins/requirements of newer buildinas in
the area. which oauses our ~reeidents to rely on the limited
off street parkin" available alon. the north side of "B" Street.
2). Removing the off street parking now available on the north
side of "B" Street. will cause at least 26 residents to park
aoross the street and dodae five lanes of fast movins traffio.
3). The speed of east bound traffic throuih a areen light at
Seoond, means the view of pede~trians oroesina the street to our
property is obstruoted ae you drive over the orest of the hill.
4). Our ree~dent profile is transitory in nature einoe our units
are rentals. Most of the adjacent units are oondominimums whioh
have less frequent oooupant turnover. This means more maintenanoe
and moving vehicles need aocess to our property than is required
of neiahboring property. whioh relates to paint number 5.
1
Sales . Exchanges . Starkers . Property Management
710 "M" Avenue . National City, CA 92050 . Bus (619) 477-4400 ,),).-11
SEP II '91 12'22 SCT PROPERTIES
p.e3
5) . Our building was conl!ltruoted with a front oanopy 7' 4" hish
over the only entry and exit to the property. Moving vans,
utility vendors and maintenance vehicles rely on parkinK alonK
the north eide of "E" Street in front of, or next to our
property to deliver soods and eervlcee. Forcins reeidente and
othere to park across the street and dodge traffic while movins
furniture oreates an extremely hazardous situation.
Mr. Rivera, I etrongly urse the Traffio Engineering Department to
leave "E" Street as marked, or as an alternative remove the
street parkins from the eouth'aide of the street.
Sincerely,
Steven C. Thomas
Property Hanaser,
Alent for property owner
2
710 OM" Avenue. National City, CA 92050 . Bus. (619) 477-4400 :lJ...../.2.
September 25, 1991
Frank Rivera
Associate Traffic Engineer
City of Chu1a Vista
276 4th Avenue
Chu1a Vista, Ca 91910
Dear Mr. Rivera:
Thank you for your letter concerning the"information regarding a
request and petition.
Mrs. Francis Guest, our neighbor had expressed a concern about the
traffic on liE" street and the current striping between 1st and 3rd
street. We are all concerned with the safety hazard when trying to
turn onto Twin Oaks Circle with either a left or right hand turn.
We like the idea of having a continuous two-way left turn lane
from 1st to 3rd and removing the parking along the North side of
"E" Street.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
\\ . ~.
~~ Jl,.Y\~
Joe & Janice Grooms
165 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
;;;"/:1
w
SSi:
,
:;~ :-:"i
" ~ ..:..
V>
m
....,
eN
<::>
tj:j ~1'; i~,.;
'I'j C". <:
'J:) :.r. P'~
.~ L ....:'
";) \:~ r~'-I
1:'"
l':i'1~:::
.~J (..~
-j
....,
x
~
W
,.
September 12, 1991
SUBJECT: INFORMATION REGARDING A REQUEST AND PETITION
This is a response to the attached letter which I received
from the City of Chula vista, Department of Public Works
Engineering Division on September 7, 1991.
The following information relative to parked vehicles on "E"
st. between 1st and 3rd Aves was gathered from 10:00 P.M.
Saturday, September 7, 1991 through 6:00 P.M. Thursday,
September 12, 1991:
Date/Time
Cars Parked
North Side
Cars Parked
South Side
Empty Parking
Spaces MG Apts
9/7 10:00 PM
7
18 (a. 12)
(b. unk)
21
9/8 10:00 PM
4
22 (a. 14)
(b. 6)
(c. 2)
11 (a. 8)
(b. 3)
(c. 0)
8 (a. 5)
(b. 3)
(c. 0)
21 (a. 9)
(b. 11)
(c. 1)
16 (a. 7)
(b. 7)
(c. 2)
18
6
9/9 7:30 AM
4
33
9/9 12:30 PM
7
(unk)
9/9 10:00 PM
4
21
9/10 7:30 AM
23
9/10 5:00 PM
7 (2)
7
13 (a. 7)
(b. 5)
(c. 1)
20 (a. 11)
(b. 7)
(c. 2)
13 (a. 4)
(b. 8)
(c. 1)
37
9/10 10:00 PM
8 (2)
16
9/11 7:30 AM
34
:1.2" If'
9/11
9:30 PM
7
15 (a. 7)
(b. 6)
(c. 2)
15 (a. 5)
(b. 9)
(c. 1)
:23 (a. 10)
(b. 10 )
(c. 3)
21
9/12
7:30 AM
8 (2)
31
9/12
6:~0 PM
4-
/'
3:.>
* a. Cars parked on the South Side of "E" st. in front of
the Mission Garden apartment complex between 1st and
2nd Aves.
b. Cars parked on the South Side of "E" st. in front of
apartments between 2nd and 3rd Aves between Twin Oaks
and Del Mar Aves.
c. Remainder of cars parked on the South Side of "E" st.
During the gathering of this information, I noted that the
most congested parking on the south side of "E" st. has been
between 1st and 2nd Aves in front of the Mission Garden
apartments located at 170 "E" st. The second most congested
area on the south side of "E" st. between 2nd and 3rd Aves
has been in front of the semi-detached duplex type
apartments located between Twin Oaks and Del Mar Aves.
These have been the only congested parking areas on "E"
street between 1st and 3rd Aves since Saturday at 10:00 P.M.
An ample number of parking spaces have been identified
within the Mission Garden apartment complex which could
possibly be used by it's tenants. Alternate parking
facilities for the vehicles parked between Twin Oaks and Del
Mar Aves. have not been identified by me for lack of
knowledge of what alternatives are available.
As a point of interest, the only other apartment complex
located between 1st and 3rd Aves on "E" st. is on the north
side at 175 "E" st. Two vehicles have been parked in front
of this apartment complex at three separate times during
this research - twice on 9/10 and once on 9/12.
Also, cars parked on the north side of "E" st. with the
exception of the two vehicles parked in front of the
apartments at 175 "E", have been parked outside of single
family dwellings with the exception of one duplex at 217
liE. II
;J.J"/~
OUESTIONS???
1. What are the parking policies and procedures of the
Mission Garden apartment owners? Please inlcude in the
answer:
a. whether specific parking spaces are assigned to
specific apartment numbers,
b. whether or not tenants are instructed or encouraged
to use the parking spaces provided for their
convenience,
c. whether parking spaces are allotted by number of
tenants in an apartment, or
d. whether parking is open and individuals simply use
their own judgement as where to park.
(It was noted that the above mentioned parking spaces
are not numbered, therefore leaving their availability and
use open to speculation.)
2. How many rear-end accidents have occurred on "E" st.
between 1st and 2nd Aves in the past 12 months, and how many
rear-end accidents have occurred on "E" st. between 2nd and
3rd Aves in the past 12 months, and were the accidents the
result of vehicles turning west or east off of "E" st.?
3. What alternative solutions has "staff" considered or
recommended besides removing parking on the north side of
"E" st.?
IN REPLY TO ITEMS A. THRU C. OF THE CITY'S LETTER:
Although the observations expressed in the City's letter of
5 September indicate that there is a greater parking demand
on the south side of "E" st., has it been noted that the
congested parking areas are in front of apartment dwellings?
As a homeowner and property tax payer I am concerned that
parking privileges for residents located on the north side
of street will be eliminated while giving apartment tenants,
who do not pay property taxes, benefits I feel homeowners
pay for and are entitled to.
Based on the City's observation, fewer vehicles may appear
to be parked on the north side of the street, however, these
vehicles are consistently parked in front of single family
dwellings.
There is always room
to solve a problem.
does one side of the
for improvement and more than one way
If turn lanes are deemed necessary,
street have to carry the total burden
.2:1../7
of change? Perhaps the apartment owners for the two most
congested areas on "E" st. could address this issue with
their tenants and find an alternate solution. Most notably,
it would appear that the tenants of the Mission Garden
apartment complex could take advantage of available parking
through some type of arrangement or agreement with the
owner. If that were to happen, perhaps it would not be
unreasonable to suggest that the curb in front of the
Mission Garden apartments could be painted red. Since I am
unaware of alternate parking possibilities for the vehicles
which park on the south side of "E" between Twin Oaks and
Del Mar, I do not at this time have a recommendation or
alternate solution.
I don't agree with the statement that says that most of the
parking along the north side of the street is already
restricted is notimplies to me that whoever suggested this
did not consider the needs of the property owners of single
family dwellings on the north side of the street.
Having lived at "E" and 1st since 1976, it is my perception
that most accidents concerning traffic on "E" Street take
place at "E" and 2nd. However, I don't have any facts to
back this up yet. Is it possible that a significant number
of accidents happen simply because people are trying to beat
the light at "E" and 2nd? Is it possible that eastbound
vehicles which need to turn into the Mission Garden
apartments are not visible until another eastbound vehicle
speeds through the light at "E" and 2nd (whether it's green
or yellow) and consequently can't stop in time to avoid an
accident? What are some other possibilities that accidents
are occurring? As I said, I am not aware of accidents at my
end of the street. I am aware of westbound traffic moving
too fast, and taking unnecessary risks by barreling through
yellow lights, and quite often running red lights simply
because there's no one to stop them. I hear the screeching
crashing sounds of vehicles bouncing over the speed "gully"
or whatever it is called constantly.
If I am westbound from Hwy 805 I usually turn directly into
my driveway. More times than I would like to acknowledge,
the vehicles directly behind me get dramatically attached to
my rear bumper as though I am committing a crime by turning
into my own drive-way and slowing down their progression.
On the other hand, if I am eastbound, I take the traffic
behind me into consideration when I approach the turn into
my drive-way. I occasionally pull toward the center of the
street since the eastbound and westbound traffic have ample
room to pass me on both sides. On other occasions I will
turn left onto 1st and return to "E" and turn right. still,
I occasionally pull into my neighbors drive to the west of
me and back out when the eastbound traffic has a red light,
and then enter my drive-way. I have also pulled into my
,1;-IB"
me and back out when the eastbound traffic has a red light,
and then enter my drive-way. I have also pulled into my
neighbors drive to the west of my home and driven across my
own front yard in order to get to my drive-way.
How I enter and exit my own drive-way leads me to agree that
the driving/parking situation between 1st and 3rd Aves does
need some attention. I would like to note here that I have
a single car garage, and a single car drive-way. Also, the
only other occupant in my household is my 85 year old
grandmother who drives to a resthome twice a day every
single day of the year to feed her sister. She parks on the
north side of the street in front of the duplex nextdoor.
Also, as a property owner, how does loosing parking
privileges effect the value of my property? Where do
service vehicles park such as telephone repair, pest
exterminators, or gardeners? Around the corner?
If I loose the privilege of parking on my side of the street
will the City compensate that loss in some way, i.e. allow
the second vehicle in my household to park in my front yard,
or enlarge my single vehicle drive-way, or construct an all
concrete front yard to accomodate the parking needs of my
household?
There has been a considerable amount of time and energy
invested in gathering the data presented here. It is my
desire that this information be considered along with the
information gathered by the City and that in the end, the
needs of all are considered and that the solution is a win-
win, not a win-lose.
Respectfully,
~~. "I /
I :/. ~'1" ~ l/< '.;'.-/ ./
'L.~/G;:~~~~~~:. I '. L
III "E" Street
Chula vista, CA 91910
.,2,)"/'
RESOLUTION NO. J/,.:J i'.:J
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A NO PARKING AREA ALONG
THE NORTH CURB LINE OF "E" STREET BETWEEN
FIRST AVENUE AND THIRD AVENUE
The city Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, Engineering staff has received requests from
area residents to add a two-way left-turn lane on "E" Street to
improve traffic flow and safety; and
WHEREAS, in order to accomplish this, parking needs to be
prohibited on the north side of "E" Street; and
WHEREAS, at the Safety Commission meeting on September
12, 1991, the Safety Commission voted 5-1-1 to approve staff's
recommendation that the City install a two-way left turn lane on
"E" Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby prohibit parking along the
north curb line of "E" Street between First Avenue and Third
Avenue.
Presented by
as to
Jl
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:RS\no park E
Bruce M.
Attorney
;2.2 -,; I
Departments.
2 . Any excess reimbursement funds accrued by Chula
vista shall remain in the city's account and roll
over year-to-year, not returned to a countywide
pool.
3. In the event that the proceeds are distributed, in
whole or in part on the basis of impound activity
within a given political/geographic boundary, that
reimbursement to Chula vista shall be allowed for
(a) vehicles impounded for violation of the city's
72 hour parking regulations, or any other type of
parking violations; (b) for costs related to any
vehicles abated from private property.
4. In the event that reimbursement is conditioned on
impound activity verification, the City of Chula
vista shall be entitled to reimbursement for
staffing or equipment expenditures.
Failing said conditions, the city of Chula vista does not support
the formation of the San Diego Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service
Authority or the $1.00 vehicle registration fee.
B. Notwithstanding the failure of the city of Chula vista's
support and consent according to the terms herein provided, in the
event that a Abandoned Vehicle Abatement Service Authority is
formed, the City of Chula vista shall be a member and participant
thereof.
Presented by
~I'
form by
William J. Winters, Chief
of Police
Bruce M.
Attorney
abandon1.wp
October 17, 1991
.2
Reso approving SDAVASA
Page 2
.2.2 -.,(~
October 21, 1991
City of Chula Vista
Department of Public Works
Engineering Division
To Whom It May Concern:
After reading the Item Title: Resolution Adopting a no
parking area along the north curb line of "E" street between
First Avenue and Third Avenue, I submit the following:
If any of you had the opportunity to put yourself in my
place, I suggest that you might feel as I do at this moment,
which is victimized. After reading the report, one issue
which keeps creeping into my mind over and over again is the
issue of, although it is being recommended that all parking
on the north side of "E" st. between 1st and 3rd be taken
away, additional parking on the south side will be made
available. I kept saying to myself, why would anyone on the
north side of the street care if there were additional
parking spaces created on the south? I certainly would
never encourage my grandmother, my daughters, my little
grandchildren or anyone else to cross "E" street on foot
unless they absolutely had to.
I said, "Ummm, if we are being asked to park on the south
and cross to the north, does that mean instead of car
accidents, we can look forward to people accidents. How
safe will pedestrians be if cars are so vulnerable?
Additional parking spaces on the south side of the street
will not serve me or my needs. Am I to tell the gardener to
park across the street and walk his tools over one at a
time? Am I to park on the south side of the street and
carry my groceries across one bag at a time? will the
privilege of having a garage sale a couple of times a year
also be taken away by virtue of not having anywhere for
people to park? Somewhere in the report it stated that
there would be ample parking for the residents on the north
without curbside parking privileges. I am here to tell you
that is not true, not for me, not for my household.
It's against the law to park cars in a drive-way if the
bumper will extend over the sidewalk. It is against the law
to park on the lawn. Now, with this new recommendation, it
appears I,the City's customer, a tax paying citizen, will be
SOL. This is the third alternate parking method I am being
asked to conform to. First it was no parking on the lawn,
park around the corner, park across the street, but don't
park in your yard. Yes, I know it's your property but we
don't like the way it looks. Second, your two cars are too
long to be parked in this drive-way, the bumper can't extend
over the curb, move the car or trade it in and get a smaller
JJ / c2 }
car. Third, sorry, no parking on your side of the street,
tough luck. And fourth, I have been advised that, even if I
could financially afford to turn my front lawn into a cement
parking lot like my neighbors to the east, that too is now
against the law. Whether this is true or not I don't
actually know, but it sure falls in line with everything
else. My neighbors to the west have a huge back lot behind
their duplexes. All we have is the curb in front of the
duples nextdoor. This is probably the appropriate time to
say that some people who live on 2nd Avenue on the northside
object to people who live on "E" street parking in front of
their homes. Perhaps you'd prefer that I have a bicycle or
motorcycle? Yes, I know I sound defensive, I am offended.
I feel defensive.
Has anyone considered the information I provided to the
Safety Council which clearly showed that there is more than
ample parking for all the cars that are parked in front of
the Mission Garden Apartments at any given time, which is
the largest area of congested cars parked on the south side
of "E" Street between 1st and 2nd? The apartment owner has
provided parking for it's residence which it's residence are
not using. I am a homeowner. I pay taxes. I am being asked
to give up a very dear privilege in favor of accomodating
apartment dwellers. I pray my neighbors across the street
forgive me, but why not paint the south side of "E" Street
between 1st and 2nd red and the north side of "E" Street
between 2nd and 3rd red, since in the report, it said there
were no objections from anyone between 2nd and 3rd.?
I am going to have surgery in
work from six to eight weeks.
me to help out. Having a red
already stressful situation.
two weeks, I will be off of
Someone is going to stay with
curb nextdoor will enhance an
I have lived at III ~'E" Street since 1977. The curb in
front of my home has always been red because it is a bus
stop. Having a red curb has always created a problem for
family, company, service people, etc. When my two children
lived at home, parking was a huge problem. Quite often two
cars were parked in the drive, and the third either on the
front lawn or at curb next door, if there was room. At
present only my grandmother and I have vehicles to park. My
grandmothers vehicle is a 1976 Cadillac, which virtually
covers over half the drive-way. My car is a Plymouth
Reliant. Parking both vehicles in the short drive-way meant
that one vehicle extended onto the sidewalk, which is
against the law. To accomodate the law, my grandmother
parked her Cadillac and now uses my aunt's VW Rabbit. My
aunt is in a resthome and my granmother goes there twice
daily to feed her. During the two years my grandmother has
lived with me, we have found the best way for us to meet our
schedules and obligations is for one of us to park in the
street. For my grandmother, this is especially helpful
},) -;) L!
since she doesn't have to stop and turn into the drive (The
majority of turns we make are right turns.)
Making left turns has never been an issue, however, turning
right into my own drive-way is constantly an issue. For
some reason vehicles moving west through the light at 1st
are so eager to put the pedal to the metal, they don't
consider that people may want to turn right. Therefore,
having the luxury of being able to just pull up next to the
curb has quite often been a lifesaver, and accident
preventer.
It would appear that the City of Chula vista is operating
under the guise that many businesses operate under, that of
putting out fires, or we can't or won't do anything until
the pain (number of accidents) is so bad that we have to
make a change. It appears to me that the Safety Council is
recommending the easiest, quickest, cheapest solution
regardless of the needs of the homeowners. I personally
would trust and respect the people who are representing my
best interests if they took into consideration what my needs
are. The issues I have spoken about are real issues to me.
Perhaps they aren't issues to my neighbors, or else they
would be here to address them. Perhaps they are victims of
the "Who cares, they'll do what they want to anyway." dis-
ease that contaminates so many institutions and
organizations. I am but one person. I am here to tell you
this recommendation does not serve my needs as a resident
and tax payer. I'm praying someone here is listening. I'm
praying someone among you is a strong enough leader to speak
out and make a difference in the quality of service being
offered. Thank you for your time and attention.
~~, }
~)~.v
,{.. . 71. ~A':?.4u7><<511a~
("'/ / "6" ~tEE I
(?#uLA vlS77'I, (}9'1- 9/9/0
"\)~ \f\. \ /:'- 'f - 1\ '1 P~d1f
MAILING LIST FOR E STREET RESTRIPING
AND PROPOSED PARKING REMOVAL
WPC 5757E - LABELS ON WPC 5758E
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
105 First Avenue 180D First Avenue 272 First Avenue 217 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIOENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIOENT
116 First Avenue 182 First Avenue 216 First Avenue 221 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIOENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
119 First Avenue 194 First Avenue 280 First Avenue 224 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
130 First Avenue 198 First Avenue 286 First Avenue 225 ALpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
134 First Avenue 202 First Avenue 290 First Avenue 227 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
144 First Avenue 208 First Avenue 110 First Avenue 228 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
146 First Avenue 214 First Avenue 114 First Avenue 233 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIOENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
152 First Avenue 218 First Avenue 101 "F" Street 234 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
158 First Avenue 222 First Avenue 163 Lansley ~ay 238 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
162 First Avenue 228 First Avenue 167 Lansley ~ay 239 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
166 First Avenue 232 First Avenue 168 Lansley \Jay 243 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RES IDENT RESIOENT RESIDENT
168 First Avenue 238 First Avenue 173 Lansley \Jay 244 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
172 First Aven~e 242 First Avenue 178 Lansley ~ay 247 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
174 First Avenue 248 First Avenue 179 Lansley ~ay 248 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
176 First Avenue 252 First Avenue 185 Lansley \Jay 252 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
178 First Avenue 256 First Avenue 191 Lansley Way 253 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
180 First Avenue 260 First Avenue 198 Lansley \Jay 257 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIOENT RESIDENT
180C First Avenue 266 First Avenue 215 Alpine Avenue 258 Alpine Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
.261 Alpine Avenue 187 Minot Avenue 227 Minot Avenue 160 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
262 Alpine Avenue 115 Minot Avenue 139 Minot Avenue 252 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
267 Alpine Avenue 189 Minot Avenue 228 Minot Avenue 161 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
268 Alpine Avenue 118 Minot Avenue 143 Minot Avenue 253 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RES !DENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
271 Alpine Avenue 192 Minot Avenue 233 Minot Avenue 164 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
272 Alpine Avenue 119 Minot Avenue 143A Minot Avenue 257 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
275 Alpine Avenue 193 Minot Avenue 234 Minot Avenue 165 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
278 Alpine Avenue 123 Minot Avenue 1438 Minot Avenue 258 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
279 Alpine Avenue 194 Minot Avenue 238 Minot Avenue 169 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
283 Alpine Avenue 124 Minot Avenue 144 Minot Avenue 261 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
100 Minot Avenue 212 Minot Avenue 239 Minot Avenue 262 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
171 Minot Avenue 124.5 Minot Avenue 151 Minot Avenue 267 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
101 Minot Avenue 216 Minot Avenue 243 Minot Avenue 268 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
175 Minot Avenue 130 Minot Avenue 155 Minot Avenue 271 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
105 Minot Avenue 134 Minot Avenue 244 Minot Avenue 272 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
178 Minot Avenue 224 Minot Avenue 156 Minot Avenue 275 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
110 Minot Avenue 135 Minot Avenue 247 Minot Avenue 278 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
184 Minot Avenue 225 Minot Avenue 158 Minot Avenue 282 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
111 Minot Avenue 138 Minot Avenue 248 Minot Avenue 290 Minot Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910
RESIDENT
143 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
143A Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
143B Las Flores
Chula Vista, CA
Drive
9191D
RESIDENT
161 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
163 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
166 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 9191D
RESIDENT
170 Las FLores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
174 Las FLores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
191 Las FLores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
193 Las Flores Drive
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
195 Las Flores Drive
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
238 Las Flores Drive
ChuLe Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
243 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
244 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
247 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
248 Las Flores Drive
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
252 Las Flores Drive
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
255 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
263 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
264 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
271 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
272 Las Flores Drive
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
275 Las Flores Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
237 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
242 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
243 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
247 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
248 Elm Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
252 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
255 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
256 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
261 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
262 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
271 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
272 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
274 ELm Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
275 Elm Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
158 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
160 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
162 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
166 Montebell Street
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
171 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
172 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
176 MontebelL Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
182 MontebeLl Street
Chule Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
186 MontebelL Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RES JOENT
189 Montebell Street
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
194 Montebell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
195 MontebelL Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
203 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
205 Church Avenue
Chuta Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
207 Church Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
209 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
211 Church Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
212 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
213 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
215 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
217 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
219 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
220 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
221 Church Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
222 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
226 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
227 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
230 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
231 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
233 Church Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
237 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
238 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
245 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
247 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
249 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
253 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
255 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
257 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
259 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
261 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
262 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
263 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
264 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
266 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
267 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
268 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
270 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
271 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
272 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
273 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
276 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
277 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
289 Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
289A Church Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
101 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
105 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
121 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
123 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
128 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
129 Second Avenue
Chula VIsta, CA 91910
RESIDENT
132 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
135 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
138 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
141 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
145 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
149 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
151 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
152 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
155 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
156 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
157 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
159 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
160 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
164 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
165 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
167 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
168 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
172 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
175 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
176 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
179 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
180 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
181 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
183 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
R.ESIDENT
185 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
186 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
191 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
199 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
209 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
210 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
213 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
216 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
217 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
219 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
220 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
221 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
225 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
226 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
232 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
238 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
244 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
247 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
253 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
258 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
261 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
262 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
264 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
266 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
271 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
272 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
276 Second Avenue
Chula VIsta, CA 91910
RESIDENT
280 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
287 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
290 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
293 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
294 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
298 Second Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
127 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
128 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
129 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
130 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
131 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
132 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
134 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
136 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
138 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
140 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
142 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
144 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
145 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
149 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
150 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
153 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
154 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RES IDENT
157 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
158 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
161 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
165 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
167 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
171 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
175 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
181 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
187 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
191 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
197 Twin Oaks Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
201-A Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-8 Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-C Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-0 Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-E Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-F Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-G Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
RESIDENT
201-H Twin Oaks
Chula Vista, CA
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
Avenue
91910
RESIDENT
228 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
229 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
230 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
234 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
236 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
237 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
238 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
240 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
241 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
242 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
249 Twin Oaks Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
254 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
261 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
265 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
266 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
267 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
268 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
270 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
273 Twin Oaks Avenue
ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
274 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
275 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
279 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
280 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
283 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
284 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
287 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
288 Twin Oaks Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
207 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
207 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
208 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
209 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
210 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
211 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
213 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
215 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
216 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
217 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT
218 Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDEIH RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
219 Del Mar Avenue 268 Del Mar Avenue 111 IIE" Street 210 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 9191D Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
221 Del Mar Avenue 270 Del Mar Avenue 114 "E" Street 226 liE" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 ChuLa Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vhta, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
224 Del Mar Avenue 271 Del Mar Avenue 117 liE II Street 228 IIEI' St reet
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
227 Del Mar Avenue 272 Del Mar Avenue 119 II Ell Street 229 IIEII Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
230 Del Mar Avenue 274 Del Mar Avenue 120 liEU Street 230 "EU Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
233 Del Mar Avenue 275 Del Mar Avenue 124 "E" Street 232 IIEII Street
Chula Vi sta, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIOENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
236 Del Mar Avenue 279 Del Mar Avenue 141 "E" Street 234 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 ChuLa Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
237 Del Mar Avenue 283 Del Mar Avenue 138 "E" Street 236 II Ell Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 ChuLa Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
238 Del Mar Avenue 287 Del Mar Avenue 142 liE" Street 238 IIEII Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
242 Del Mar Avenue 288 Del Mar Avenue 146 II Ell Street 240 "EII Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
248 Del Mar Avenue 290 Del Mar Avenue 153 "EII Street 241 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
249 Del Mar Avenue 168 "0" Street 159 "E" Street 242 uEn Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
256 Del Mar Avenue 172 110" Street 167 IIEII Street 244 IIE" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIOENT RESIDENT
261 Del Mar Avenue 174 "0" Street 185 "E" Street 249 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIOENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
262 Del Mar Avenue 176 "011 Street 176 "EII Street 255 liE" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
263 Del Mar Avenue 182 "0" Street 182 "EII Street 264 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
264 Del Mar Avenue 190 "0" Street 163 "E" Street 265 "E" Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
265 Del Mar Avenue 109 "E" Street 181 "E" Street 275 IIEI' St reet
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
267 Del Mar Avenue 110 "E" Street 203 IIE" Street 280 IIE.I Street
Chula Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 ChuLa Vista. CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIL\EIn RESIDENT RESIDENT
-28'S "EII Street 148 "E" Street, [B2] 238 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
295 "E" Street 160 "E" Street, [C1] 239 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
175 liE II Street, [Mngr.] 160 liEu Street, [C2] 248 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 IIEII St reet, [A1] 160 liE" Street, [C3] 256 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 IIEII Street, [A2] 160 "EII Street, [C4] 258 Davidson Street
Chula Vi sta, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RES IOENT
150 "EII Street, [A3] 160 liE" Street, [CS] 260 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 "E" Street, [A4] 160 "EII Street, [C6] 262 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 IIEII Street, [ASJ 160 "E" Street, [C7]
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 "E" Street, [A6] 160 liE" Street, [CB]
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
150 liE" Street, [A7] 170 liE" Street, [02]
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 "E" Street, [03] 210 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 liEU Street, [D4] 211 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 "E" Street, [05] 215 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 Upl Street, [06J 216 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 IIE" Street, [07] 218 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 "E" Street, [DB] 220 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 "E" Street, [09] 231 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
170 "E" Street, [010] 234 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
RESIDENT RESIDENT
148 "E" Street, [B1J 235 Davidson Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Chula Vista, CA 91910
October 18, 1991
Agenda Item 23
TO:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM:
John Goss, C~tG Manager
Dawn Herring~~dget Manager
VIA:
SUBJECT: City-wide Consultant List by Reason for Hiring, an
alternative method of consultant data presentation
At the July 23, 1991 City Council meeting, Council requested a
report on the City's use of consultants and service contracts.
This report will be reviewed by Council at the October 22, 1991
meeting. In order to facilitate the Council's review of this data
the attached listing has been prepared which provides a different
approach to reviewing the data.
As a result of input from the Council, the consultant data has been
combined and sorted another way to provide Council with an
alternative view of the data. The attached report combines all
ci ty-wide contracts whether they are Consultants, Contractual
Service providers or related to a CIP project. This summary
includes 163 entries which have been sorted by the "Reason for
Hiring", and then appear alphabetical within each category.
The reason for hiring lists three main options, Cost Effective,
Expertise and Workload, although some consultant are hired because
of a combination of these reasons. In general the categories are
defined as follows:
1. Cost Effective - Upon analysis of the cost of contracting
for the work required it is found that it can be done cheaper
by an outside Consultant than by City Staff.
2. Expertise - There is currently no one on City staff who has
the expertise necessary to do the work required, and no one
can be brought up to speed in a timely manner.
3. Workload - There are City staff who have the ability to
complete this work, however, because of high workload they
would not be able to accomplish the work when it is required.
When a combination of categories is listed the one listed first is
the primary reason but the second category also played into the
decision.
(cntdatae.a13)
23../ /2J*,1-
p~. 2-
.<=
"0 '"
" " '" '"
" u ... "
... ~ c ~ .Q ... ~ ...
u ~ '" '" '" .& "
'" .S: ~ '" ~ .<=
0> c '" !J u ~ u u
c ~ ~ "0 "0 .!'! 0
'" " '" 1;' ;?! c ...
"0 '" '" " '" '0 .Q
" " '" 0 ... "" '" "0
.<= " " ~ '" ~ ~ U 0>
~ U ~ ~ 0 " "0 C > '" c c
0 c ... '-' " ~ 0 " ~
~ ... 2! 8- ~ " ... u '" "0
~ C 0. ~ ~ 0. C " .!:
" '" 0. > '" 0 '" ~ u
'" C C '" '" 0 0. .!: ... ... ... '" .; .Q
" 0 " " CO " '-' 0 " '" '" .Q
" ... '" ... w "0 ~ > !I, .!'! '" ... "0
0> 0. ,., '" '" ~ ... ... " " c
'" " u c "" ~ c 0 0 '" "0 U "0 '" '"
"- ... c '" c '" ~ 0 .:!! ~ ... "
" 0. " 2! '-' u c " " " 0> 0>
oJ 0> >< ~ ~ fa ~ ~ " 0. ... ~ c c
'" '" " '" '" " u ~ ...
.:!! '" ~ -' '" 0> " ... '" > ~ " ~ ... .Q ~
,., w ~ " '" "0 0> U 0 .Q C
~ > ~ CO '" '" c c 0 '" ~ ~ ... c "
" "0 '" '" '" '" 0 ... '" u .<= 0 ... ...
'" "" '-' '" w '" :E '-' "- "" '" u ~ :E 0> "-
"
$
~ .~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0>
U C C ';0 C C c .!:
~ ~ .0 .0 " .0 .0 .0 0
~ " 0> 0> C 0> 0> 0> 0>
C C C C C C C C C
0 0 0 0 "" 0 0 0 0
'-'
"0
" 0 '" ... 0 ~ '"
... '" '" '" '" '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" 0 ~ ~ ::.1 0 '"
""' 0 ~ N 0
" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ '" ... ~ N ~ '"
'" ~
'"
~ 0> U U U U
0. C " " " "
" '" OJ '" '" '"
'" ~ ... >
" .. C .. .. " ..
0> C " C '"
.!: ... c '" 0 '" '" '"
0 .0, ~ '" ~ ~ !! ~
... ~ ... ... ... ... ...
;!;: C '" " '" '" '"
'" W "- "- "- "- '-' "-
" C
0. .~
... .2
0 ~
~ " '"
" > ~
.Q " "
"0 0>
C '" ci: ~ "
.~ " ~ " >
U " ... " '"
~ ... ... ... "
'" > 0. " ~ ...
~ !! ... 0. C "
iij 0> ~ " ~ >< 0> 0 .<=
c c '" 0> " C 0> '" g
'" '-' ; "0 .e
" ... " .Q .: C " ...
... 1';\ " U ~ U '"
0. " 0> C ~ " 0 ~
" ... .!: '" '" 0. 0. ~ C > 0>
... " C ~ " >< ... '" ... .!:
CO c 0> i!1 '" ... " 1t "
z ,., w C 0. '" "0
i!; ~ W '" '" ';0 C
';0 " '" .;; "
" ~ ~ '" << 0 C U '"
'" '" C '-' C ... 0 '" " C ~
" 2! i3 !J '" "0 ... U '" '" 0>
'" ~ "0 ~ " " C ~ C C
0 ... .~ C '" U 1;' > '" C '" U "
~ " '" '" ... " .Q " ... " ~ ~
0. :;:; " ~ " ... '" "0 '" .~ C C
Z >< '-' '" ~ 0. U '" ... " 0
0 W " '" '" 0 " " '" ... ~ ...
~ "- "- "" CO '" ... "0 CO U 0. "-
W
'"
>-
'"
'"
W ~
'""" ... ~
'" " ~ 0.
0 0. ... "
'" >< 0 '"
W " '" C
>- ~ ~ "
~ ~ ~ " .~ U
~ ~ 1;' oS
w ... w ~
:E " c 0. '"
'" ~ 0> 0 ~ .Q .:n
'" '" ... '" ~ 0
0 " ~ 0 ... .!:
'""" '-' .Q '" '-' "-
Z C ... ';0 .<=
<< 0 0 '"
'""" " '" 0. "- C 0>
-' 0> " " ... << 0> 0 .:!! :;:;
'" C ~ 0 W C '" 0
'" ~ .. '" '-' '-' '" '" "
Z ... ... " ... "-
0 ;?! U ~ '" C 0
'-' Z '" 0 '" '" '" .Q 0
'" '" 0 ... ';0 '" ~
~ ... .<= '" CO " ... -'
C 0 << 0> 0 " ~ "
~ '" ~ :E C 0 ~ ~ 0 .;; 0>
'" ~ C '" '" U "
~ C oJ '" u c '" ~ "
<0 " 0 ~ " 0 ... '"
~ '" '" ~ ... C '" ~ C '"
~ C '" " ~ '" '" C " ... C
0 0 " .<= " " 0 0 " '" ~3'3
~ '-' '" '" " '" '" '-' '-' "- '"
<= '" " "'-
~ '0 ." U <= "'
<- <= ~ u " ~
<= ~ '" 0 0 > Q.
~ '" Q. <- ~ '" :!;
" >. ~ ~ " 0
~ ." U <- U ." '" ~ "
<= ~ ~ 0 <= '" <= 0 ~ >
<= '" ... " ... ~ ... .~ ~
~ <- .Q ~ 0> U OJ ...
0 '" " ... c( " " '" ... u '" ~
~ '" ... "'- - '" .<= <= ~ <= <-
,; <- <- >. ,. u ~ <- '" N ...
'" " 0 <= ... ~ <- ... <= '"
N N ~ ... Q. 0> U <= ~ '" " '"
~ '" '" '" ." ~ U ~ ~ <=
<= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <= ." ~ ~
~ '" " <= <= ~ '" - " 0 Q. 0 ~ U
" 0> " " ~ 0- '" .<= ijj ~
0> <- ." 0> 0 OJ " ~ '" <= '" <- '"
'" 0 <= '" >. Q. '" " " " ~ .<= 0 ~ '" ~ ~
"'- ~ ~ 16 ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ U <= OJ '"
~ ~ '" '" ~ <= OJ '" OJ .~ ~ '" Q. .- m
~ '" U U <- ~ " Q. ~ Q. U ~ '" Q
'" U ." '" " '" " 8 '" '" '" > '" ~ '" u u u
OJ " <- ~ <- ~ U 0> " ~ <= ~ ~ <- " '" "
." 0 <- ~ <- " u <- ." <- ~ .~ ." U <-
~ <= id 8- '" 0 ~ ~ U .Q Q. ~ .c " <= 0 <= ~ ~
<3 0 .5 Q. .5 ~ " OJ m 0> " :;;: Q. 0 <- ~ Q.
U <- '" '" Q ~ '" '" ~ ~ 0 U Q. ~ ~ u
!
~ ~ ~ .~ 0> 0> 0> .~ ~ .~
u <= <= <= <= <= <=
'" ~ ~ ~
<- 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ " 0> 0> ~ " ~ OJ
<= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <=
0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
U
."
OJ ~ "' '" 18 '" en '"
<- ~ co co en co en
- - - - - - -
'" "' ~ '" ~ '" '" ~
OJ ~ '" N '" N ~ '"
- - - - - - -
~ .. ~ co ~ N "' '"
~ ~
Q
'" '"
Q. Q.
~ U u 16 0> '" '" u 16
Q. OJ OJ <= - - OJ
" '" '" <- '" '" '" <-
Q 0> ~ <- ~ ~ 0>
.. .. 0 OJ <- <- .. 0
0> <- <= OJ 0 0 <-
<= '" '" "'- <- <= '" '" '" "'-
.[ ~ ~ 0 ~
<- <- ~ ~ ~ .Q .Q <- ~
'" ~ ~ '" ~ <= " " ~ '"
"'- "'- 0- c( w "'- "'- "'- 0-
<=
<= .~
~
.<= .: Q. ~
;!:: <-
~ " " ~
" is u E ~ '"
." U i
c( >. 0 ~ <=
'" j '"
0> 0> <=
<= <= ~ 0> .~
:;; <= ~
~ ~ ~ OJ <= ~
u u ~ '" ~ ~ " ~
" " ~ <= u U
." <- '" 0 " '" <= OJ
<= ~ .c <; ~ '" <- '" '"
0 '" " 0> <= ~ <=
u <= <= > ." ." .~ <= OJ U
OJ 0 ~
'" ." Q ~ <- ~ u <= :;;
z <= '" <= '" <- !! '"
~ " - <= <= 0 <- <= ~ "
::; OJ " .~ .~ ,.. <= " 0 "'-
~ 0> " Q.
'" '" ." '" u ~ ~ ~ 0> 0 ~ OJ
~ <= '" ~ ~ ~ <= U Q. m
'" ~ N OJ :;; N ~ Q. w ;1: " '"
'" <- .[ '" <- u ."'
~ OJ <= ~ ~ ~ <= u '" ~ '"
Q. ~ <- OJ <- '" .- <= '" ." <-
z x E' 0 Q. 0 0> U <= > '" <= <= OJ
'" W Q. X Q. 0 <- ~ ~ <- 0 ~
:Q '" '" w '" > '" ~ u ,.. u ~ u
w
'"
>-
co
Q '"
W N "'
,.. , ~ "
'" ~ "' , >
Q <- ~ "'
~ 0 ~ ~ ~
'" u
>- - '" '" OJ
~ ~ " " ~
~ " " ~
w i;> i;> w <=
:E .~
~ ~ ~
~ '" rg- ! '" ~
0 0 '"
,.. u w u <-
z 0 OJ
c( m Q. 0 Q.
,.. 0, ~ '" <- '"
~ " " 0> OJ 0 U
~ <= ~ ~ <= ~ u '"
~ ~ u u '" '" OJ ."
z <- '" '" <- ~ <=
'" <- <- ."' u <= <= '"
u z '" ~ ~ '" ~ 0 ~ '" ~
<= <= <- ~ '" Q
~ <- 0 0 ~ <- OJ '" '" ~
<= 0 u u ~ 0 '" c( 0> .~ ,..
~ '" ~ "'- ~ ~ ~
~ ;!:: '" '" .. <= <= ~
- <= " " <= '" '" ~ .<=
co " 0 0 0 " 0 ~ ." :E ~ U
~ '" '" '" <= OJ '"
- <= '" <- <- .<= '" u " 0
'" 0 " '" '" '" OJ '" ,.. OJ <- :l.~ ,(j
~ u '" :> :> '" '" Q '" c( co co co
-
..
+' +' ....
0 ~ U +' " ~ '" '" '"
" .", " '" u '" '" u U +'
" .~ .';: "'- .... " "
:c " ~ 0 '" u ..... ~ '"
+' " .... .... +' ~ ..... '" " u
" " 0 '" "'- 0 ~ ..... 0 +' " '"
..... 0 "'- ~ " ..... 0 ~ '" +' >>
0 >> .... ~ CO - iij '" "'- " +'
~ -'" '" "'- '" '" - .... '"
'" +' "'- '" " u '" u .... +' '" i1! "
" ,; .J; '" 0 " u " '" ~ :0 ~
~ ~ ~ " ~ '" 0 ~
+' '" ~ ~ , '" " ~ " N .... iij
'" " +' " " '" ~ " ~ '" " '" .. "'- +' ~
~ 0 0 ~ .... " +' '" +' .... '" U
.... .... -'" ~ ."' 0 0 " ~ " +' " +' >> '" '" ~
"'- '" , '" ~ '" ~ " U U 0 .... 0 -'"
'" " " ~ ~ -'" +' ~ .Q i!! 11 ~ .... +' +' U
'" ~ '" ~ '" .... U .... ~ .... .... "'- ~ ~ ~
~ '" '" '" > '" ~ +' "" +' '" " .Q
c.. N '" " d '" u '" '" ~ ;!: ';;; '" u ....
.... :;; ~ ~ '" "'- '" "'- '" ~ '"
'" ~ ~ '" u 0 '" .~ ~ ~ ~ CO ~ '" " '" ~
~ .:!! +' ~ " ~ +' U "' 0 u ~ u ~ ~ :0 "' "
.~ R:;: '" .Q ~ .... ~ ~ '" " "'- , ~
u > > "'- '" > "'- ~ +' ~ U ~ ~ "'- '" >> > ~
+' '" 15 ~ .... ~ 0 ~ .... 0 " ~ " ~ ~ '" '" +' 0
" "'- > '" " .... ~ .... }; ~ ~ ~ "'- ~ -'" :0 .... +'
CO ~ U ~ ~ ~ c.. ~ ..... c.. ~ w ~ ~ u U ~ U c.. ~
'"
$
+' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
u " .~ " " " " " ';;; ';;; "
~
.... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " " 0
+' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" " " '"
" " " " " " " " ~ ~ "
0 '" '" CO '" '" '" '" CO
U
~
'" ~ gg gg ~ '" - '" ... '"
.... <0 <0 '" '" <0 <0 '"
- - - - - - - - -
'" '" - - '" '" '" - - N
- '" '" N - N '" '" -
'" - - - - - - - - -
+' '" '" ~ '" - N ~ <0 '"
~ - -
CO
>
.... .... ~
'" ~ ~
'" ~ "'- "'- "'-
+' +' '" U U U '" '" irl
"'- " +' - '" '" '" - -
'" '" " ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ '"
CO U ~ ~ ~ ~
.... .. .. .. i:' .... .... ..
'" '" 0 0 0
" .... '" X ~ ~ ~ ~ X X ~
.... " ~ .Q ~ ~ ~ .... ~
+' " .... .... .... .Q .Q .Q ....
~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ " " ~
'" Z "" c.. c.. c.. c.. ~ c.. c.. c..
~ ~ '"
" '" U
-'" '" ~
U :0 "'-
~ '" ~
" '" ~
'" " +' " "
+' +' " ~ '"
~ " ~ ~ "'-
.... .... .Q 0
'" .... ~ "
" "'- '" '" .... .....
'" '" ~ -'" 0
'" ~ .... " ~
, '" i!! '" '" '"
.... N ~ .,; U U U
'" '" " " "
+' ."' ~ " ~ ~ ~
f ~ " " " "
> 0 " '" '" '"
u .... " +' +' ..... '" '" +'
'" '" '" +' .... " " ..... " " "
z u "'- ~ ~ "'- ~ .Q.
~ ~ .... i!! i!! +' "'- ~
..... " '" ~ '" '" ""
'" 0 ~ 0 "'- ~ ~
'" ~ " '" ~ '" '"
'" ~ +' .... "'- "'- ~ ~ ~ ~
'" +' " ~ +' '" ';;; ~ ~ :g
'" .... +' " U U +' +' ~
"- !!. +' " ~ ~ '" > ~ ~ '" '" 0
" ~ 0 +' " ~ ~ ~ ~ +' '" '" +'
Z X ..... ~ ~ .... " " ~ .... .... ~
'" w .... .5 ;: .... ~ ~ ~ " +' +' "
:Q c.. ,.... '" .... ~ ~ u ~ ~ u
w
'"
>-
'"
CO
W
,.... '" +'
'" > "'-
'" '"
~ +' '" U CO
U u .5
>- '" .... "
;J; ..... ~ .~
..... .;
W +' U
"" '" ~ .5 '"
=> +' U U .Q .>!
~ ~ 0 '"
,.... 0 ..... > .... u " >
u 0 .... c.. .5 ~ ....
z '" "'- ID '"
;:: .... V1 0 '" ~
0, '" '" '" '" ~ +'
...J ~ +' '" .... "- VI '"
=> " VI '" '" V1 JI u
V1 ~ U VI CO U U "
Z .~ -'" " VI +' ~
CO -'" U ~ " ';;; ~ '" '" '" "
U Z '" "- .... ~ " ~ '" +' '"
~ '" ,.... ~ +' ~ 0 .... ~ +'
+' .... .... +' " ...J '" +' ~ .~
" 0 '" ~ >> ..... 1i ~ x
- .. ..... +' 0 ~ .; ~ ~
'" ;!: ';;; :> " ~ '"
- " " >> 0 .... N
'" " 0 .... ~ ; +' .... '" .... >> '"
- VI ~ +' " +' ~ " ~ '"
- " ~ " " " > ~ " '"
'" 0 '" '" -'" 0 " 0 ~ '" ~ u .23 ,5
- u '" u u u u w "- '" '" ...J '"
I-
;b ;b ..
~ '"
oo ~ ~ ~ '"
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i:'
a. ~ I- '" oo u oo U I-
0 '" oo 11 " 11 '" .. "
.; 0 a. a. I- a.
~ ~ I- ~ ~ .0 ~ '"
0 0 a. '" oo '" oo ~
,..; 0 11 l- S- ,~ 0 1:'
'" '" ~ .. .. ~ S-
u oo .. oo a. a. '" :I u ..
" .~ '" '" '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ .0 S-
.. - ~ '" S- " I- " ~ "0 .0 '"
... " ~ S- a. ~ a. ~ 0 S- ~ " "
'" ~ S- a. ~ ~ ,~ ,. 0 " .. :I
~ - a. oo .; .; ~ ';:: '" ...,
,~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ " '" ,
,~ u S- ~ .. ~ .. '" ~ .. '" ~ ~ ~ ~
" 11 '" "0 0 oo ~ oo ~ oo '" ~ '0 ~ ,g
'" S- - oo I- ~ ~ '" ~ '" ~ :~ .. S- ,~ '"
.. ~ .. 0 .. I- ~ S- ~ :I .. oo oo oo
0. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" oo '"
a. ,- 0 1:' ~ '" ~ oo ~ oo oo oo '" ~ ~ '"
~ .. Q - ~ a. ~ ~ ~ ~ S- .. oo '" '0 '"
u '" ~ 0 u ~ S- U ~ S- ~ .. ~ ~ ,.
'" ~ '" a; > .. S- '" .. '" '" .. ~ ~ ~ ~ S- S- -
"0 U ~ '" '" S- a.- I- '" oo oo oo '" > ~ ~
~ oo .. a. ~ > '" 0 '" 0 '" ~ :I > 0 oo i;,>
:I .. a. a; ~ ~ .!:; oo 0 a. S- 0 a. S- S- O S- "0 S- O
Q ~ '" .. '" u 0 a.u 0 a. >- 0. ~ 0. .. 0. U "0
'"
a.
~
~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
u oo oo oo oo ';;; ,~ oo oo
.. ..
S- O :I 0 0 0 :I 0 0 0
~ '" oo '" '" '" oo '" '" '"
oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo " oo
0 0 "" 0 0 0 "" 0 0 0
U
"0
'" 1:5 a; 1:5 0 ~ '" 1:5
S- '" '" '"
- - - - - - -
z - - - - - - -
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'" - - - - - - -
~ ~ ~ - N - ~ '"
.. -
Q
> >
S- S-
~ '" ~ '"
~ a. '" a. '"
u 0 0
a. '" - ~ - ~
'" '" ~ oo ~ oo
Q '" ~ > > '" ~
'" .. S- '" '" S- 1:' 1:'
0 Q Q 0
oo ~ "" '" "" .. '" ..
';:: '" .. ~ ~ S- .. l-
S- .0 oo .0 .0 oo :;!
.. :I .. :I ..
Z 0. 0. :E U U 0. ~ :E ~
S-
'" 0
U ~ '"
.. ,~
a. ~
v> S- ~
.. 0 oo
oo ~ ~
'" a. S-
a. v> v> 0.
0 .. '"
U "0
~ ~ '"
0 0 > N
S- ~ ~
'" '" '" oo oo
u oo v> ~ ~ ..
oo .~
.. '" U
oo ~ oo '" '" '" ~
'" S- .. .. a. '"
~ a. I- ~ oo oo '" u
'" oo ~ '" S- v> .. ..
::; 0 '" '" :E :E '" >
11 "0 S- ~ ,~ oo I-
:::; oo a. oo '" '" :~ '" '" '"
'" .. ~ ~ oo oo '"
z v> '" .. ..
a. 1:' .. ~ 11 ~ ~ a. ~ '"
'" ~ .. '" ~ v> S- .. ~
0 I- U '" v> ;2 w w ~ u ...
"- '" ~ > '" ~ S- S-
a. "0 a. '" '" ';;; ';;; '" "0 '" :I
Z X oo a; > S- '" oo > u
0 w .. ~ oo ~ '" '" I- .. ~ '"
\2 ~ Q U w '" '" >- ~ '"
W
'"
>-
'"
Q
w
>- '"
'" >
0 '" '"
'" ~ oo oo '"
u .. .. oo
>- '" ~ ~ '"
~ ~ ~ v>
~ oo
w u u '" ~ ~
:E oo S- '" S-
~ ~ ~ ~ 0. U '"
'" v> oo oo a. a.
0 ~ ~ .. > X
>- U U .. S- W
Z '" v> '"
;:: '" '" U "0 U '"
0, .. .. " 8-
~ " " > .. "0 '"
~ " '" .. S- ~ '" I- "
'" ~ ~ :E :E '" ..
Z S- U '" :I I-
0 '" ~ '" '" '" '"
U Z z a. S- ~ ~ '" "0 "0 z
.. S- S- S- '" '" '" 0
~ S- U S- Q '" '" S- oo oo '" S-
oo 0 ~ .. a. a. >- 'E 'E S- O
- .. ~ "0 z S- O 0 .. ~
'" ~ oo 0 S- S- a. "-
- " .. 0. 0. 0 '" '" "
'" :I 0 ~ ..., I- >- ~ ~ :!! 0
- ~ ~ '" " " '" '" ~
- oo .. u ,~ a. u u ,~ "0 "0 a; .. 2a..'
" 0 '" :I >- >- oo oo '"
- u '" '" '" '" >- >- >- ~ ~ "" '"
"
." ~ '" ~ >, '"
!:' '" '" ~ ~
" ~ ~ ~ ~ ." '"
.9- ~ [';:; ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~
.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ u ~
.... ~ ~ ~ ~ " I- ;2 '" l- I-
~ 0 ~ ';0 '" '" " 0 " 0
" '" Gi ~ .;; ~ => => u .... >- ~ e.
'" ~ '" V> ~ u Gi u 0 -' .:!! ~ "
'" ~ > u g>.8 " " 0 0 I- ~ <C I-
~ " " ~ " l- V> ~ V> ~ e. 0 u u
V> aJ .~ e. .;;; '" ~ ~ ~ V> ~ ~
V> " ~ l- e. => => I- ~ ,; '" ~ 8j
'" I- a: ~ '" 0 " 0 '" 0 '" 0 '" ." l- =>
.... c. - '" " I- .... I- U '" U '" .... '" 0 I- ~
0 " I- ~ l- I- ~ e. ~ ~ '" .... u ~ V>
I- 0 0 ;;: '" Gi ';0 Gi ;;: ~ " V>
" ~ .... e. ~ '" ~ V> l- V>
'" .~ " ~ " .~ ~ ~ "'- "'- ~ '" ~
'" > 0 '" .... I- ~ '" " ';0 " ';0 ~ :> ~ '" ~
0. ~ ~ l- e. ~ => ~ V> - - => " ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ " u 0 ~ 0 ~ '" ~
~ ~ V> ~ ~ i: u ~ ~ " " " " u => u ~ '"
V> ~ '" " ~ ~ I- ~ I- ~ => ~ >
.:!! '" I- ~ ~ .= ~ " '" '" ';0 ~ ~ => '" 0
~ " I- ~ ~ ~ '" u > e. > e. ~ u 0 '" I-
~ V> ~ '" u '" ~ ~ '" 0 u 0 " 0 " '" ~ ~ u '" e.
<5 ~ ~ " '" > >, 0 " I- 0 l- I- l- I- " ~ .... => u ..'. .!!'
-' ~ <C o.u ~ u -' e. ~ 0. C. 0. e. -' 0 <C '"
"
$
~ .~ '" .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~
u ~ ';0
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I- 0 =>
~ " '" " " " " " " ~ "
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" <C '"
u
~
~ '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ ~ '" '"
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
- - - - - - - - - -
'" ~ N ~ N N N ~ ~ N '"
'" '" N ~ N N '" '" ~ ~
" - - - - - - - - - -
~ '" N '" ~ '" '" ... .0 .0 ~
'"
Q
~
.~
~ '" ~ U '" '" '" '" '"
e. ~ '" " ." ~ ~ ~ ~
" I- a: 'S: 'S: 'S:
Q I- ~ l- I- ~
'" " ~ "" " " " " " "
" " " " " " U "
" ." " V> " " " ." I- " "
~ ~ '0, 0 '"
I- '" I- '" '" '" ~ " '"
'" " '" ~ " " " ;1;' "
o.u <C 0. o.u o.u o.u o.u .... o.u
~ '"
" V> "
'"
~ l- V>
~ " V>
" U "
.~ ." ~ U
~ V> 0
" '" ~ I-
" -" => " 0.
=> 0 0- '"
0- '" " ~ ....
" " ~ '0 0 " "
0 '" .,; => ~
'" ~ 0 ~ 0
" ~ " e. "0 '" U
~ " 0 '" :i. >
l- V> '" U 0
0 ';0 " ~ ~ I-
~ I- ~ U ~
~ e. E
'" " V> " " :c
:!'i g " l- .;;; .... ';0
'" Qj Qj Qj Qj => I-
~ " V> V> ~ 0. "
" ~ "0 > 0 - V> V> V> V> " '"
'" V> " ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~
'" ~ ~ 0 ~ => => => => .:!! '"
a: ~ .... ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~
'" I- .b ~ '" u u u u 0 .... u
.... " l- V> '" " .!= l-
e. " c. I- ~ i "0 "0 "0 "0 ~ "
z X " e. '" u V> ~ ~ ~ ~ > I- ~
'" o.u " => " '" " .... 0 0 0 0 ~ " ~
~ ~ V> -' ~ Q 0 '" '" CO CO o.u u
o.u
'"
>-
CO
Q
o.u
>-
a:
'"
~
>- "
i V>
~
l-
=> "
V> e. u
>- X ~
Z o.u
;:: '"
-' 0> ." " c<
=> ~ I- ~ ~
~ ~ u " " u .~
z I- " l- I- l- I- "0 =>
'" ~ ~ " " " " I- 0
u z '" V> e. e. e. e. 0 >- -
" 0> l- I- l- I- X
~ I- U ~ ~ '" '" '" '" ""
~ 0 0 o.u '" '" '" '" ~ X
~ '" .... > ~ "
'" ~ I- ~ u "" "" "" "" 0> ~
- ~ " '" ~ ;;: ~
'" => 0 ~ u ~ ~ Ii Ii Ii 0
~ V> V> 0 '" 0 V>
- ~ '" V> > => 0 0 0 ~ i3,1
'" 0 " !ii' "0 0- l- I- l- I- 0 " 0
~ u a: <C <C CO CO CO CO Q Q
'" '-
<= ';;; 0
~ '"
<= <= ~ ."
.g> ~ u <= '" u 0 ~ ';;;
~ '" ~ <= '" ~
~ ~ '- '- ~ ~ '" ~ u
'" u '" 0 ~ g Q. ~ <= .S; '- ~ '"
CO ~ ." .,; '" '" !j '" '" 0 ~ .~
.<= ~ <= - '- ~ ~ '- ~ ~ <=
~ 0. '" " u - ~ <n ~ '" ." " '" 0 <=
'" >- ~ <= '- " '" '" '" u
>, '- ~ ';;; ~ :;; " " w :JI u 0 0 .<= ~ '"
~ '" ~ ~ .<= ~ <= .0 ~ ~ '" '- '" '-
'" '" ~ '" ~ '" .~ ." 0 <= ~
"' '-' '" '" 0 ~ .<= '- <= .<= ~ '- <= 0. 0
<= 0. U ~ '- '- " u " 0 " <= 0 " 0.
~ :;; ~ ~ '" ~ 0 0 '" ~ <= ~ '" .~ ~ ~ <= .0 '- ~ ~
0 0 ~ 0 <= ~ ~ ~ .~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
'" ~ ." '" i ~ '- > ." '" .<= ." ~ '-
'" <= <= <= <= <= ~ 0 ~ '- <= 0. U <= <= " '"
'" .~ u .~ .~ 0 ~ '" '" ~ 0 " '" '" '" ~ '- .,;
~ <= ~ '-' ~ ~ ." '" ,;;
~ ~ <= ~ ~ ;;- 0. U <= ~ ~ '" <= .~ ~ ~ " Q.
'" '" ~ ~ '" u ~ " " <= 0 ~ u " " 0
~ '- ';;; '- '- '" '- u '" ." .0 U 0 ~ 0 ~ .~ .<=
" '" '" '" <= '" ~ .S; ~ .S; <= <= ~ ." ~
Q. ~ 0. '" U 0. :! ~ ~ <= .<= '" ~ > ~
~ " <= " " " u ~ '" ~ '- "0 0 ~ u .~ '" <( ~ '- '-
~ '- '" '- '- " '- '" ~ '- " <= '- '" '" <= ~ '" 'i1
CO ~ '" ~ >- '- ~ ~ >- >- <n '" ~ 0. " ~ '" <( <n '"
"
$
~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ '"
u <=
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'- 0
~ " " " " " " " " " '"
<= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <=
0 <> <> <> <> CO <> <> <> <> <>
'-'
"0
" <> '" '" <> ~ <> - ~ '" ~
'- '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
- - - - - - - - - -
~ - N "' "" <> N - N - -
<> - - N "" N <> - <> <>
" - - - - - - - - - -
~ "' '" '" - '" '" ... - - ~
'" -
CO
~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
Q. <= <= .~ <= .~ .~ .~
" .;: Q;
CO '" '- '- '- '- '- '- '"
<= " " " " " " " <= <=
'" " " " " " " " <=
<= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= 0
<= <= ~
'- ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '-
<= <= <= <= <= <= <= "
~ ~ W W W W W W W ~ ~
~ '"
U -= "
" U
~ ;!: <=
<= '"
.<= ~ '" ~
e ~ ~ '"
<= <= ~ .":
'" 0 '" "
'-' ;!: "0 '"
"0 <= "0
" ';;; ~ "0 <=
'" ~ <= <= 0
<= ~ <= '" <= '"
" <= 0 '"
U ~ U '"
<= 0. ~ ~ ~
'" <= <= <=
0 <= .s "0 '" '" '"
,,; '- <= ~ ~ ~
'- >- '"
~ > " ~ ~ ~
'" <= " <= ~ ~ ~ ~
Z ~ W <= '" '" <= <= <=
~ '- - <= 0 0 0 ~
" '" '" '" '" '-' '-' '-'
" 0. <= <= '" ~
~ ~ >< '" <n "0 <=
" '- '" '" '" '" ~
'" ~ " ';;; U U <=
<> '- <= " U U U
~ '" '" <= '- ~ ~ <= <= <= <=
0. '" ~ ~ '" '" '" <=
Z >< ~ '" <= '" '" <= <= <= '" @"
<> W " <= " '- '-
~ CO W '" >- >- ~ ~ ~ ~ W
W
'"
>-
'"
CO
W
>-
'"
<>
<n
>- '"
'" "
~ ~ ~
'" <=
~ 0
'" S- u ~
~ " U 0 S-
<n Q. U .:; U ~ .~
>< .s <= ~
>- W - <( S-
Z ,j ~
<( ,;; ..
>- '" U ..
...J '" " <= "
::> " ~ " S- '" ~ ~
<n ~ '" S- "
Z '- '" U '" ~
<> ~ u <n ~ '" .:; '"
'-' Z ~ 0 " " <= ~
~ '" '" U '" '" " U '"
~ S- .<= ~ <= 0 '" ~ ~ '" '-'
<= 0 '-' <( ~ <= <= <= 0
- '" ~ S- .~ ~ " '" "
'" ~ ~ .. " <( ..., ..., ..., S- ~
- <= '" " S- O 0 0 .~ S-
'" ~ 0 -" <= " .. " " " '"
- '" '" '" " "0 ~ .0 .8'
- <= '" ~ "0 '" " '" "0 "0 "0 ~ " ~B
<> 0 " 0 .5 <= S- ~ '" '" '" "
- '-' '" CO w ~ ..., '" '" '" ~ ~
V> >, "C
U
.", 0> rn "C <=
<= .:2 ~ rn .... '" ~
0- 0 0 0 <=
"C +' V> .... ~ " +' "" - .; " 0
<= V> rn " +' "C d !j V>
rn ~ +' ~ rn <= <= i7 " V> 0> -
V> c.. i!! 0 0 0 0 "C +' +' '" '"
0> V> .... >- ." V> <= ....
<= '" <= 0 '" +' +' +' i:I i!! 0 i
0 - V> <= .... 0> '" '" '" , +'
.... 0 +' .S! 0 ~ ~ "C V> :> ;, V> V> ""
" +' - +' +' U - <= V> +' V>
" 0 rn <= +' '" ~ "C ~ >, <= " <= <=
~ <= V> +' ~ .... u V> .... > +' 0- '" U ~ V> 0 +'
" <= .... +' ~ " 0 " V> U +' V> U +'
0> U 0 0 0> V> .... U - rn '" '" '" " V> " V>
" <= a. <= 0> +' " u t' .... 0> " U +' .~ "
" > +' V> '" 0 V> > V> .'" " ~ 0> rn B- 0 +'
0> .... '" <= u <= <= .... .... +' 0 <= <= +' > ....
'" +' " .... '" <= i!! +' 0 " "" V> V> '" - i!! "C " a. "C "
c.. <= V> '" .... '" <= u V> <= ~ ~ V> '" .... <= +'
i!! a. >- <= ~ "-' " ~ "C - V> V> rn '"
"C " +' " 0> ~ U <= 0 " +' V> +' ';c <= +'
V> V> " .... " - U "C <= .... ~ " .... u U "C U +' 0 " V>
" V> +' a. +' " V> .S: " " .... '" +' " .0 .... ~ '" > .~
" rn rn <= .~ " +' +' .S: ~ " +' ~ > .~ '" 0 "C :0: ~ ~ ~
+' V> " "8..:2 E V> 0 V> <= V> ~ 0> .... 0 +' U <= N > +'
" V> " ~ V> .... " " " " " .... V> " 0 rn <= ."
0 "" .... +' => c.. c.. "" c.. +' U "" U .... "" V> a. "-' .... u '" .... "-' V>
"
$
+' .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 0> .~
U .~
rn +' +' +' +' +' +' +' +' +'
.... " 0
+' " " " " " " " 0> "
<= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <= <=
0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0 0 0
U
"C
" ~ 0 '" ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ '"
.... 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> '" '" '" '"
- - - - - - - - - -
'" ~ '" N '" '" ~ ~ ~ '" '"
'" '" N '" ~ '" N '" '" ~
" - - - - - - - - - -
+' ... ... '" '" ~ ~ ~ ... N '"
'" ~ ~ ~
0
V> V>
a. a. '"
+' 0> 0> 0> '" '"
a. <= <= .~ - - <=
" V> V>
'" .... .... .... -'" > -'" > > ....
" Q) " .... " .... " " "
'" Q) " " 0 '" 0 '" '" "
<= <= <= <= '" '" -'" <=
.... '" '" '" .0 ~ .0 ~ ~ ~ '"
<= <= <= " " <=
'" "-' "-' "-' c.. u c.. u u u "-'
V> "C
+' <=
U V> '"
.... ,. <= "C
<= +' '" .~ <= 0
V> ~ +' " V>
V> V> '" <= 0
" '" "C " ';c u 0 !ij ....
u u '" <=
U +' +' <= +' .... 0
> " <= t: <= ~ .:2 '"
'" .... a. ~ V> ~ 0 V> +'
<= " V> " ';c .... " '"
V> '" V> <= a. u <=
.... .... V> 0 U +' .~ V> <= .~
" +' 0 " .... <= .... V> +' "
" <= - V> " 0 .~ .~ ~ <= '"
.~ ~ '" V> +' > ~ U +'
<= .... '" i!! +' <= "C V> .... V> <=
'" '" " U "-' '" d " 0
z <= '" u '" "C " .... " '" +' ';c U
"-' '" <= '" <= <= a. " .~ 0- '" '"
"" <= '" <= '" 0 V> +' V> ~ <= +' :0: +' ....
" +' i!! <= i!! <= '" " V> <= '" <= <= "
'" V> <= 0> +' +' .0 " .~ :0: ~ V> ~ +'
i!! >- .~ u - V> "C ;, " '"
"" +' +' +' " '" +' +' V> 0 ~ '"
'" .... V> U U U U .... .~ !O '" .... "C ;g. "C 0 <=
>- " V> " " <= +' V> .= " .... .... .~ <=
a. " .~ :Q .~ '" V> +' ~ <= +' a. 0 " '" 5 +'
Z ~ V> 0 0 " <= V> '" V> '" 0 U > N > V>
'" "-' V> .... " .... 0 Q) "-' .... >, > .... " " '" <= .... "
V> "" c.. c.. c.. - U +' U >- V> " c.. "" "C '" "-' '" >-
""
"-'
""
>-
'"
u
0 ~
"-'
>-
""
0 <= <= V>
V> 0 0 .:!' V>
>- " +' +' .... "
~ V> '" '" +' U
.... .... V> <=
+' +' +' " V> "
:0: .... V> V> "C "
=> " ~ +' U
V> a. V> <= <= V> '" V>
~ " ~ i i7
>- "-' u V> u
z " <= 0 '"
;:: > "" u .... V> +'
.... .s: 0 V> V> e
~ '" Q) Q) Q) +' Q) "" i!!
=> e V> u u l- +' +'
V> ~ e e Q) "" '" .. e
z .... '" '" V> 0
0 '" e e V> a. u ,. ....
u z '" ';c ~ " 0 0 u
u >- >- 0 V> > ~
+' .... e <= .... V> " <=
<= 0 '" ';c ';c 0 ~ '" "" '" "-'
~ '" - .~ >- d
'" +' a. a. V> .... .. '" e
- e >- V> .. " '" '"
'" " 0 u u Q) +' V> e +' +'
~ V> V> .... ~ ~ '" V> V>
- <= '" e e e 0 u ~ V> .... .... t3~9
'" 0 Q) " " " .... " 0 0
~ u "" :0: :0: :0: c.. "" "" V> >- >-
~
"0 " 0>
m ~ "0 "
" " '- " ....
0 '" " '" '" " ~ ....
~ 0> 0 .... .... ~ := '"
0> Ii z " " '- ? '- i> ~
'" " ~ '" '" 0 0 ~
.... '- ~ w ~ ~ >
~ u 0 '" ~ 0 '" -
~ i:I ~ '- >, 0> 0> 0 '- '- 0> W .-
.... ~ 0. ... " .a " 0. 0 "0 'i! u
~ " .~ ~ '" '" "
~ ~ '- '" ~ .:: " '- ~ '- >, 0 '" .c "
0 '- ~ '" '" '" ... " a: ~ .... 0
"0 ~ ... 0. '" '" '" '" " '" w
'" .... " ~ " '" " '" s
.... '" '- ... " "t; :0 ~ 0. ~ >,
u '" " 0. '" W 0> ~ " " ~ ~ .... '0
'" ~ 0> 0 '" w " 0 '" " '" 0 0> 0 "0
'" .~ '" u .c '" '" ~ " '" '" w '-
0> 0 oJ 0> " ... " " '- ... " 0. '" 0. " W '" Ii ....
'" '- " ~ '" '" 0 0 " ... 0 .... '" 0 u U 0> "
Q. 0. .... ... u 0 " 0> " ~ 0> " .c " 0 " 0
'" ... " 0. " >- ~ ... " ~ " .... '" 0. '" W
..: .... ~ .... ~ '" '" '" '" " '" " '- ~
~ V> '" U '- '- V> " ~ '- u m u '- '- '" 0 '-
'" 0 ... '" '" '" ~ 0> ~ '" " ~ " '" ~ 0> .... .... > '"
.c .~ .... 0. .>< " '" 0. '" '" '- '" 0. '" " ~ .c
.... > ... .a 0 .~ ~ '" '- '" ~ ~ '" " ~ '" " '" "0 .:;; " 0.
" " .'0 ~ '- ~ '- '" c.~ ~ '- ~ > '- " '" ~ '" 0
Q '" Q. Q. Q. << 0. ~ << 0 ~ Q. '" >- "" >- '"
'"
$
.... .~ 0> .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 0> 0> 0>
U " " " "
'" .... .... .... .... .... .... .0
'- 0 0 0
.... '" 0> '" '" '" '" '" 0> 0> 0>
" " " " " " " " " .s "
0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W
"0
'" 0 ~ 0> ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ~
'- 0> '" '" 0> 0> '" 0>
~ - - - - - - - - - -
V> N ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 N ~ N N N ~ 0 0
'" - - - - - - - - - -
.... ~ N ~ 0> ~ V> '" ~ ~ ~
'" ~
Q
>
'-
'"
.... V>
0> 0> U 0> 0> 0> 0> U
0. " " '" " " " " .... '"
'" 'S: '" 'S: " '"
Q '- > '- '- '- ~
'" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" ""
0> '" '" Q '" '" " "
" " .!: ~ .!: " " " 0> ~
.>< S '" .><
.!:: 0> 0> '- 0> 0> 0> 0> " '-
" " '" " " " " '" '"
~ '" '" Q. W '" '" '" '" "" Q.
'-
"
....
"0 "
" " ....
'" W "
"0 '- ~
" 0 0
" V> " '"
0 0> " " U ~
'- " " .,. " $-
'" ~ V> 0> " '" "
.~ " " " .c
.; Q .>< 'S: ~ '" 0.
.... '- 0> 0> .... 0
'" '" Ii '" " .!: '" " " 0>
U " Q. '"
" .~ .... '- '- " '- ~
'" ~ " '" '" 0 ~
>, ~ '" '" 0> .1=
u .... V> " " " "0 " ....
V> " '" " " 0 ~
'" 0 0 0> 0> ~ '" '"
;;"; W '" Z " " .... 0.
'" " '" '" '" " U
'" .... '- 0> '- > i!; 0 " 0>
'" " " " ... .... "0 "
~ ~ ~ .... V> .... .... " " W .... 0
~ U U ~ ~ ~ ~ '-
'" .... 0> U '" " m 0.
0 '- 0 .!: .- .... .1= ~ '" m 0
~ '" '- " ~ ~ ~ '- 0> 0 '-
0. " ... ~ .c .c '" '" " 'i! .... " ....
Z >< > 0 ~ '" U U ~ ~ " ~ "0 "
0 '" " '- " '- .1c .1c ~ ~ " '" " 0
~ '" '" >- >- << << '" V> .- >- W
""'
'"
>-
CO
Q ~
"
""' ...
>- .~
'"
Q u
V> 0
~
>- " ~
~ ~ <<
.... "0
"" '- " '0
~ " '"
V> 0. '-
>< " ....
>- ""' ~ ~ "
Z " 0
<< .>< 0 w
>- u ~ ~ ~ U
-' 0> '" '" '" '" .... ....
~ " U .... .... .... .:; U ~
V> ~ CO '" '" '" " '"
Z '- , "0 Q.
0 " '- U U U 0
W z ~ u .c 11 0 0 0 ~ '- m
" 0 ~ ~ ~ '" Q.
.... '- ~ ..., ;; ~ ~ ~ U '-
" 0 << << << 0 "
~ '" ~ " , > " ....
0> .... ~ ~ '- " " " '- "0
- " '" '" " " '" '" '" " "
'" " 0 ... " 0 "0 ~ ~ V> >- U
~ ~ ~ V> .>< "
- " '" '- ~ " - V> " '-
0 0 '" 0 ~ :;; .c ~ u 0> 2.a,/()
~ w '" >- >- '" '" '" '" << <<
~ '-
'" 0 '-
'- C> 4- "C 0 C>
'" c; '" u ~ '" 4- '"
'" 0 '" ~ ~ .:: ~ '"
.a 4- ~ .!: '" ~ '- ~ '-
~ ,; '" '" ~ ~ .., '" '- "
"C 0 " ~ 4- 0 ~ ~ u '" '" "C
'" '" " 0 0 ~ c. 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" ~ ~ 0 '" ~ '" ~ '" '- ~ ~
~ 4- ... '" '" u ~ '" u c. ~
~ '" '" u C> 0 " "C C> '" c; ~ c.. ~ E "
'" c. .~ '" ... ... " '" '" !a "' ,; ~ " ...
'" .a 0 ~ '" ... ... ... '" '" 0 '" '" "C .a
... u '" u '" ~ u ~ " ... >- ... ... "C '" '"
'" " "C 0 "C '" '" ~ 4- '" C. C> C> " 4- 4-
'" '" ... ~ >- c. 0 '" 0 '" ~ ~ 0 '" ~ '- C. 4- 0
... :i1 ~ 0 i:' ... 4- ~ U ~ ~ u ... 1;,> 0- 0 '"
~ 4- 4- '" 0 C> '" '" 0- ~ i:' ';;; u
" " ~ 4- 0 '" .a '" ... 0 4- '" ... '" -C '"
C> ... '" '" '" 0 " '" " Q; '" 0 '" " '" '" > '"
'" ... " '" ~ ... .~ '" ~ ... ... " " u 0- "C " ... 0 ~ ...
c.. '" ~ 4- . 0 111 5 '" > '" '" '" ... '" '" " .a ... '"
~ " ... '" '" ~ ... '" .~ '" C> '" ~ "
'" ~ E ~ ... ... '" ... " u 8. '" 0- '" .!: " ...
~ ... " '[: irl .:: " ... >- .!: ... "' '" '" .:: "C u
.:!! e .!!! ~ '" ~ ... '" ~ "C ... .; '" ... 0- '" ~ -; "
... 0- ~ 0- ~ u 0- " ... ... '" 0 ... " '" ~ '[: " ... "
... " " " E ... ~ '" '" .!= '" ;;: is u ... " > ... 0 ~ ...
.5 0- ~ 0 '" '" '"' '" 0 ... 0 '" '" 0- '" 111 '" ~ 0- ... !j!
0 u u c.. . " '- u c.. ... u >- ~ "C o "C ~ '" ~ c.. 4-
"
~
... C> C> .~ .~ .~ C> C> C> C>
U '" '" ';;; '" '" .!: .!:
'" ... ... ...
... 0 0 " 0 0 0 0
~ C> C> " " " '" C> C> C> C>
'" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0 0 0
u
aJ '" - - - - - - '" ~
.!= '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
- - - - - - - - -
'" - ~ '" ... "' '" "' - -
0 N N 0 0 N 0 0 0
" - - - - - - - - -
... ~ N N '" '" ... N ~ ~
'"
'"
~
0-
~ u u 0 u u irl
0- " '" - " "
2S "" "" ~ Q; "" "" ""
> ~
... " ... ... '" ... ... i:' ...
C> '" 0 '"
.i= ~ ~ x 0 ~ ~ '" ~
~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ... ~
... ... ... ... .a ... ... ... .c ...
'" '" " " '" '" '"
'" c.. u c.. ... c.. c.. c.. c.. ~ c..
"
~
~ ~ ~
'" " ~
... N .:= ... ...
'" .~ u
~ '" > '"
0 ... ...
" "
C> ... ~ u ~
'" u '" u
'" " '" '" f<
111 ~ 0 "C
... ... '" C>
'" ... u 0 '" 0 '"
... => u " u ... '"
'" '" " ... u '" ... 0 0-
.c 0- '" ... '" "
4- ~ ~ ~ ~ > ... ~
'" "C 0 ;<;:: '" u '" ... u ';;;
z '" ... '" " " ~
B '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ... ~
.~ => "C ~ ... '" ~ ~ 0
" ... '" ';;; '" 0 ~ "' '" 0-
'" ~ '" ... '" .~ 4- U '" ... ~
'" '" ~ ... 0 '"
"" ... ... > C> " ... C> C> U '"
'" ... " ... ~ .i= ... u " '" ~ '"
... " '" " ~ u " .:= '[: ... "
0- ... ~ ... " 0- '" ~ '" ...
z '" ~ '" - ~ ... ~ 4- '" '" ... '" ~
'" w " ... N " ... '"' 4- " " '" '"
~ "" c.. N >- ~ 0 '" >- c.. c.. x
w
""
>-
'" u
'" '"' >,
c. '"
w '"
>- ... C> ~
"" 0 .!:
0 u
~ ... U
0- "
>- " " ~ ...
~ ~ ~ .!: '"
~ ... ~
... ... C> U
'" ... '" " '" "
=> " 0 '" w ... C>
~ C. ~ '"
>- '" ... ... ... ~ '" ~
w '" '" u '"
z ... c.. C> ... '" C> !j
'" 0 '" '" '"
>- 0- C> '" i::' ...
~ C> ... .i= ... ~ 0 '" ~
:0 .i= 0 ~ " '" " >,
v> ~ u ~ " ... ... " '" ~
z ... " >- '" u ~ "
0 4- 0 " u " "
u z '" '" '" u ... " " ... ...
0 .~ 0 ... ~ 0 ... '" ~
... ... '" '" ~ ~ " .c '" '"
'" 0 ~ ~ '" " '" ~ ~ x
- '" 4- '" '" u '" 0 "" ~
'" ;<;:: '" ... " u u c.. '" ~
- '" .:= 0 ... >, " 0
'" " 0 4- ... '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ... ~ " '" '" '" "C
- '" '" ~ - '" 8 ... 0 '" ... .c 2a~JI
0 0 " '" 0 ~ > ... 0 '"
- u "" u u '" w w ... .., .., ~
'"
~
'"
'"
..
0..
'"
z
-
'"
'"
'"
'"
~
z
'"
~
w
'"
>-
co
Q
W
>-
'"
<:>
V>
>-
~
:E
~
V>
>-
Z
'"
>-
-'
~
V>
z
<:>
u
~
0>
-
'"
~
-
<:>
~
~
.:!!
....
"
Q
'"
$
....
U
..
...
....
"
o
u
"C
'"
.~
'"
'"
....
..
Q
....
0.
'"
Q
'"
"
.~
'"
'"
~
....
...
'"
0.
X
W
'"
Ia
z
....
"
..
....
"
~
"
o
u
.. '"
U "
.~ ...
.c '"
U ....
"C ~
"
.. '"
'"
"
~
'"
-
V> ~
...
" '"
o ....
....
t: ~
o
0. "C
c.",
" ....
~ ..
'"
.. ...
~ Ii .~ ID
...... .c...
In en U In
..5 ~... ~ ~
'"
~
....
...
'"
0.
X
W
'"
"
...
'"
...
o
.....
"
o
~
..
'"
'"
..
U
" ..
.. ....
.c ~
U,5
i!!
.~
....
'"
"
<:>
~
0>
-
'"
N
-
N
U
'"
'"
""
~
~
...
..
0..
"
o
....
U
"
...
....
~
"
o
u
'0
o
0..
'"
"
.~
.:;;
v>
-
U
....
..
"
Jl
U
"
-
.;;
o
o
0..
"
.~
~
~
:E
'"
"
U
..
...
'"
'"
"
o
'"
"
<:>
'"
CO
-
~
<:>
-
~
'"
"
"
o
~
...
'"
0..
in
....
~
~
'"
"
~
U
..
...
>-
....
"
..
U
0.
~
~
::::
v>
~
in
....
~
>.
v>
..
....
..
Q
~
::::
V>
.c
U
~ ..
'" '"
.~ .t;
.... "
!j 0
....
'" '"
"C "
'"
'"
~
" "
'" "
> 0
" U
.~
'"
.c "C
....
.~ >
e
~ 0.
...
i.8
..
"
"
.1i
'"
'"
-
~
<:>
-
~
'"
U
o
0..
'"
~
..
.. .Q
"
" 0.
~ 0
'"
15 i;
... "C
.....
~~
~ ~
'" .....
.... ~
..
.Q
.....
.....
.. ....
... ...
"''''
>
"C "
" 0
..u
.~
....
'"
"
<:>
'"
"
...
'"
'"
"
'"
"
w
'"
~
..
.Q
..
....
..
"C
"C
"
..
"
o
~
... ....
'"
"C .....
" .....
'" ..
..... ...
..... '"
o
"C
~ ~
" ~
'" ~
> '"
"
~ ~
o.c
.....
"C
"
..
~ ~ "0
C (tI $... Q) Q,1
::J c: 0 II) ::-
o ::s 0 10 Q)
U '- U CO "'0
'"
"
~
'"
U
>
...
'"
v>
;:J
i
u
~
CO
.c
....
"
o
v>
"
o
~
...
'"
>
"
o
U
0.
..
:E
~
'"
"C
'"
"
.~
'"
....
'"
"C
"
~
..
....
'"
"C
o
....
~
...
'"
>
"
0....
U "
~i
~
" '"
o .c
....
...
.. ~
> ..
..... .c
o U
"
"'~
"
"C ~
" "
o
.Q
....
'" "C ..
~ " U
.. ..
.Q
.. '"
.... "
..
"C ....
"
0. .-
1!1 t
.c
....
.:;;
~
'" <<
U v>
" 0..
..
.... "C
~ "
..
.Q
"
0.
>.
....
U
~
~
.. >.
....
.. u
.~ <1)
" .c
.c ....
;b:rl,+-
... .... 0
'"
.... 0 '"
... '" ....
.. "C ..
::::I..... ...
t7:>v>
'"
"
o
'"
"
<:>
'"
"
o
'"
"
<:>
>
...
'"
v>
....
"
~
'"
..
"
..
:E
>
...
'"
v>
....
"
~
'"
..
"
..
:E
'"
U
"
..
....
~
~
~
..
'"
"
"C
"
CO
"C
"
..
'"
"
....
"
...
0..
..
U
"
.c
U
'"
....
"
o
....
U
"
"C
o
...
0.
o
'"
"C
:>
'"
"
....
.=
...
0..
'"
U
"
..
....
~
~
~
<<
o
"
"C
:>
"C
'"
.=
E
'"
....
'"
"C
"
~
"C
'"
"
.~
'"
....
'"
"C
"
~
"
~
....
"
"
"
o
0.
15
U ...
'"
" ....
.;:: :::I
"t ~
" U
.....
~ ~
... ...
.....
.. "
0. ._
~ ~
'"
.=
o
'"
"
<:>
'"
~
-
~
<:>
-
~
>
...
'"
v>
....
"
~
'"
..
"
..
:E
'"
U
"
..
"
"
....
"
1!1
...
'"
....
"
0.
15
U
~
...
.....
"
..
:E
~
~
"
~
'"
...
~ "
....
.. U
... C
" ....
.... ~
1!1 E
.....
..... "
o
>. ~
.... ~
'"
.Q
"
0..
"
..
"
t7
'"
"
....
~
'"
>-
'"
.=
o
'"
"
<:>
~
0>
-
~
<:>
-
'"
'"
.=
...
"
"
"
'"
"
w
~
'"
U
>
...
'"
v>
'"
"
....
~
'"
>-
..
...
'"
....
..
:E
U
,5
>.
"
..
0.
15
u
'"
"
....
~
'"
>-
~
'"
....
..
....
v>
"C
'"
....
"
~
~
....
"
~
>
o
"C ...
'" 0.
gj .~
"
o
>.
~
u
....
~
p~
U "
"
of?
"
....
~
>.
....
.Q
~
~ " '"
.. ....
'" ..
..... ...
'"
"'"C
... ~
:1,
~ i5
0.. _
.~
....
'"
"
<:>
~
0>
-
~
<:>
-
N
>
'"
Q
~
U
~
U
,5
"
....
..
...
"
"C
o
:E
, ~
i5 '"
-'
....
oJ 5
u ....
" ...
.. 0
" 0.
0.
~ 0
'"
"
'"
.=
~ ~
" "
o 0
'" .c
~
in
....
~
~
...
'"
~
U
"
N
....
"
"
....
...
o
0.
0.
o
....
~
o
u
-
"
~
....
...
"
0.
X
W
'"
"
...
'"
...
o
.....
"
o
"'
..
"
'"
~3,1:L
'" l-
e " 0 -
0 e '" .... .... -
'" "0 ,., .... e .= - '"
.... e "0 .... ~ e
'" ~ 0 e e '" '" << :rl
;!:: .0 '" ~ Q. ~
'" 0 U 0> ~ " '" '" Q.
~ " .... .., '" u '" '" '" I- '"
i:' '" "0 0 e .... .... e 0> " .... ~ '"
e .... e ~ e 0 ~ e .,; e ~ .c
0 0 '" ~ ~ .., " I- ~ a: ....
.... u '" > '" 0 u '" ~
e 0> '" '" 0 .c '" .... e Q; Ji' 0
" "0 U e '" " '" 0> '" ~ .c '" 0> ,.,
- > e '" '" " e ~ l- e '" "0 '"
- e '" Co. e I- '" '" 0 " 0 I- " e ,., "0 "
e 0 << '" .., .c l- e " .... ~ 0 .... e '"
" '" .... - '" I- 0> 0 .... e .c '" '"
" e e .... - , !!. Q. U -;;; .!!!
0> 0> 0 ~ Q. e <> e IS "0 .... e ~ " e ....
'" 0 0 ~ 0> 0 '" " '" I- '" '" ~ u
~ '" .... a: " .... u .... .... " '" a: a ~
'" .:!! .... " .., .., '" I- .., E " "0 ....
U ~ '" I- U I- " " Ii; 0 '" .;! '" " I- '" '"
'" .:!! u I- U 0 l- I- " Q. '" N "
" :::: u e '" I- Q. '" '" l- I- '" " I- "0 ~ << .c I-
~ ,., '" Q. ;!:: .., Q. Q. Q. 0> e '" u "
.... .... u .!: " '" '" " " "0 0 '" " ~ "0 '" a: '" ..,
~ e 0 I- '" " l- I- e l- I- .c 0- e Ji' - " e
"' - e <D Co. Q. '" "' a: Q. ~ '" Q. >- .... << '" '" >-
"
$
.... .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ 0> .~ 0>
u -;;; e .!:
'" .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
I- ~ 0 0
.... " " " " e " " 0> " 0>
e e e e e Ji' e e e e e
0 <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
U
"0
" - 0> <> - 0> 18 <> ~ -
.= 0> <D 0> 0> <D 0> <D 0>
- - - - - - - - -
'" - .... N - - <D .... "' ~
<> - N <> <> N <> - N
" - - - - - - - - -
.... ... '" "' '" '" .... ... ~ ....
'"
Q
I-
"
.... 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> .... U
Q. e e e .!: e e "
" '[ " a:
Q 0> l- I- I- 0> I- U 0>
0> .!: " " " " e " e ..
" " " " " "
e e e e e e e e l- e '"
e e ~ e ~
I- '" 0> 0> 0> 0> .!!! 0> .... '" l-
e e e e e '" '"
'" ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" z ~ ~
'" '"
.... " "0 '"
U u
l- e '" " "
I- '" '" Q. '"
.... Q. '" '" '"
"0 '" " .:e .= ~ '"
e I- ....
'" '" "0 Q. .... '" '" 0 u
.... Q. Ji'
0> U .... 0 '" " " ;!::
e " e .., l- I- "0
Q. ~ 0> e .... ?l ~ "
e '" e '" '" .,; .... "0
e .... '" " "0 '"
'" e I- '" I- U ~ e u ....
'" 0 " " '" iij .... '" "0
~ ;!:: .... '" " > .... e ~ 11 e
'" e l- e 0> e ~ a '"
'" ~ I- '" " ~ e "
'" !j '" " 0> '" .... I- .... .c
z e 0> "0 e u e 0> ::;: 0 ....
.... 0 '" e '" -;;; 0> e '" ~
~ '" u e '" '" '" 0> '" e e 0
" ,., .... ~ .... e e e e '" ~ u 0 ,.,
'" '" '" e 0> e .:;! '"
0> ~ .:!! e ~ '" .... l- E .... .... ....
25 .... e u .... '" " ~ " u '"
I- U U U '" .c .:e " '" .... ~ "
Co. !!. e .... 0> e " e '" " ~ .!: I- '" e l- I-
e .... '" '" .~ '" " .... :c '" " .~ .... "
z " .!!! '" e e 0 .!: '" 0 0> ~ '" '" ....
Q '" I- '" I- '" l- I- ~ e 0- u .!'; .!';
~ ~ >- '" Co. ~ .... << ~ '" ~ " << "0 '"
'"
a:
>-
<D
Q <>
'" ~
>- .... ,
a: '" "'
Q 0 e '"
'" u .:;!
-
>- " .... '"
~ '" '" "
I- ~
.... ....
'" I- '"
~ " u
'" Q. e Q.
" '" 0 ,jj
>- '" -13 !j '"
z '"
<< << .... <<
>- '" '" '" '" '"
-' 0> " " " " ,., .. ~
~ e '" u .... .... .... '" ....
'" ~ .~ " e '" '" '" "0 U
Z I- .... '" e e '"
e '" e u u U 0> .!!! I-
U Z '" - e 0 0 0 ....
u " Co. '" '" '" '" l- e
.... I- 0 '" '" '" '" " '" 0
e 0 '" '" e -;;; << << << e '" u
- '" .... '" "
0> .... ,: << ..., Q. e e e u '" '"
- e , '" '" '" e ~
<D ~ 0 " .. " u ~ ~ ~ .... " 0
- '" '" .... '" >
- e '" '" "0 e - - ~ " l-
e 0 " " '" '" ~ 0- .... '"
- u a: '" ..., '" '" '" '" '" << '" "" ~'3 ../.)
~ ~ "
0> ~ ~ 0
~ ... 0- ... '"
.!O '" '" ... '" ;= 0 ~ '11 0-
'" ~ '" Ii ~ " '"
.!O ... ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ " ~
~ ~ 0 ,. u >. ... ~
... '" X CO ~ ~ '" u i:' '" '"
0 ... ... ~ '" ~ >. ~ 0- " ~ '" ~ 0 ...
~ ~ 0 ~ ... ~ ~ 0> U ... ... '" ~ ... '"
..... U 0- 0 '" ... '" 0 '" ... ~ ~ ~ 0-
~ ... '" 15 ..... '" ... ~ 0- ~ .c '" ... '"
0- 0 ~ ...., .~ 0- >. " 0- '" 0 ...
0 ~ '" " 0 u ~ 0 ..... ~ ~ ~ --' " 0- 0-
~ ~ U 0> ... " '" ... 0 ... ~ 0 '" '"
~ ~ ~ 0- '" ~ 0- '" ~ '" ~ ... "
~ ,. ~ ~ ~ " 0- ~ .c ~ ~ "
... " ... '" " 0- .c 0 0 '" ~ .~ ~ -;;; '"
0 " '" " 0 0> ~ ~ ... ~ " 0
'" :0 0 ~ " '" 0 ~ 0- ~ .~ ~ u ~ ~
0> ~ '" ifj ~ " :0 '" ..... '" " "
'" '" ~ 0> ~ " ~ ~ .... '" 0> " 0 >.
~ u .c " " .; 0> " .... '" u ~ '" ... ~ .c " '" ....
~ '" " '" ~ .... ~ ~ " U 0- .... ,; .... "
,. .c '" .; .... .~ 0- " '" .... 0 " '" ... ~
~ ... ~ u '" u ~ '" u " '" ..... u .c '" " ... 0 0
'" '" ... 0> ... '0 '" ~ '" 0 " ..... ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" 0- U
~ 0 '" '" " ...., 0 u u ..... " ~ .; .... ... 0- 0-
.... .... " ~ ~ ,. 0 ~ 0> ... ~ '" '" " ... ... 0> '" '" ...
~ .:; ~ '" " " ... '" ~ '" 0 0 0- .... 0 Ii ;<;1 '" 0- ... '" 0
'" .... '" ~ ~ "" << z ..... I-- '" ~ ~ U 0- => ~ ... .....
'"
0-
~
.... '" '" '" .~ '" '" .~ .~ '"
u .!O " " .!O " " -;;;
'" .0 .... .0 ~ ~
... 0 0 0 g, ~
.... '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "
" " " " " " " " " " "
0 CO CO CO 0 CO CO CO CO CO <<
u
"
'" CO '" ~ CO CO <> CO
... '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
- - - - - - -
z '" '" - N ... - -
- CO CO N CO CO CO
'" - - - - - - -
.... '" '" - ~ '" '" ~
'"
'"
.... '" '" '" '" '" '"
0- " '" " " .0' " "
'" ~ .;:
'" ... Z ... ,. ... ... ...
i:' '" '" '" '" '" i:' '" '"
'" '" "" '" '" '" '" '" '"
" '" " " " " '" " .0'
... '" .0, ~ ...
.~ .c '" "' '" '" "' '" '"
" " " " " "
Z --' "" '" "" "" U "" --' "" ""
'" " ~
" " '"
... '" U
'" ,. ~
'" '" ... "
" '" '"
... U ~ '"
0 " '" '" " "
..... " " 0- " '"
'" "" ~ .~ ~
'" ~
.!O -;;; Ii ... ~ .~ '" '" '"
0 " "
" .~ ..... ~ ~ " " U
" ,. .... 0 ~ \j " ...
~ " '" .... U ~ .... '" !J
'" '" " 0- ;= ~ .... "
0- ~ ~ ... U ~ "
U " .... << ~ ~ ~ >. .....
'" '" " ~ ~ ~ U '"
==: .!O .>1 '" .- ~ ~ '" "
~ ~ "''' 0- " ... ""
;!; " .... '" " ... U ~ " '" '"
'" .;0 '" '" -;;; 2! .... '" '" '" ;= '" ....
Z ~ .... " '" " 0- ~ "
... ... '" ... U ~ ~ 0 >. ~ ~ ~
'" .... I-- 0 ~ ~ '" .... ... .... '"
CO ... 0- U .... ... .~ U ~ ~ ... '" ~ ~ .:
... 1t ... ~ ... U ~ '" ~ '" ..... ~ ~
0 " '" ~ ~ ,. ...., '" -;;; 0- .~ '11 '"
z X .... '" .... ... ... 0 ~ 0 ~ '" ~
0 "" ~ ... .!O .... '" ... ~ '" ... " '" ~
~ I-- I-- ~ "" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" '" ... ~ <<
""
'"
>-
'"
'" .(;>
""
I-- ~ ~
'" ... ....
CO 0 " ~
~ '" .>1
- ~
>- '" ....
:; ~ '"
...
.... ....
'" ... ~ .c
=> '" U
~ 0- " ~ >.
X .:; '" U
I-- "" -e '" '"
Z ... ... ...
;:: << '" '"
" ~ ~ ~ .... :0 ~
--' '" '" 0 '" '" '" - '" '"
=> " '" U .... .... '" --' ~ ....
~ ~ ~ ia .... " '" '" '"
Z ... '" '"
CO ~ ... " U U U
U Z Z 0 0 0 0 " " " 0
--' 0- ... ~ ~ '" '" '" ~
.... ... ... ~ ~ " " " ~
" 0 .: '" 0 << << I~ .e .e <<
- '" ..... U '"
'" ~ ~ d 0- "" "" "
- " '" '" '" '"
'" ~ 0 " 0 --' .:e ::. ~ .... .... .... "
- ~ ~ " ~ ;:; '" '" '"
- " '" '" .... " '" '" " " "
CO 0 '" .c 0 ~ ~ ?z >. " " " 28..-;1
- u '" u '" "" '" '" => => => '"
... '"
.... co 0 '" CO
'" CO 0 ~ CO 'i .... .;
"- ~ !i! ,~ ~ !j
'" ~ :!! .... ~ ~ ~ ....
.... '" ~ CO ... '" c ~ 0 ... c
'" ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... .... ~
'" ~ 0 s: > '" c ~ CO CO '" ~
... CO ~ '" .0 "- '" CO '" ,~ 0
'" .. " ~ '" ... CO >
.... "- CO .... ';;; '" '" .... ... .... c.. "- '" 0
... " "- ,~ ... CO "- CO '" .... ~ .. u ...
0 ... '" ~ ~ u ... ... --' '" '" .~
"- "- '" " " u ~ 0 '" ~ "
" CO N t7 " '" CO "- - "- ~ ~ ~
"., ... ~ ;E "- ... ';;; > -'" ?? '" '" " 0 CO
~ CO ';;; ... ~ '" 0 u ... c.. ~ ... ~ CO ~ C
';;; '" 0 CO ... '" " ~ "- CO ~ ';0 co
~ ~ > ~ ~b .... ?? "' 0 "- ,~
'" " " i!j CO ~ '" ~ , ';;; i~ ';;; " ...
'" CO CO .0 >. '" ." " ,- " " ~ " .... ." '"
'" CO 0 ~ 0. -'" .0 ~ 0. '" ,~ .... :- " ... > .... '" "
c.. '" ~ '" 0. '" " -'" ~ '" ... .~ is. CO C ."
.... CO 0 ~ '" " '" U ." 0 <Ii '" 0 1:,> .... ~ "
'" ... " -c ... ... '" ~ " ~ .. '" 0 ,~
'" ... 0 0 ~ '" '" " ,~ ,;; ~ CO > ... .... ... '" CO '" ....
" '" 0. U " ~ 0 -'" 0> <C 0 .. ~ <> ,~ ... ,~ ~ ~
0. 0. ';: ." .... U CO ~ ... 0. CO ~ CO '" 0. ~
.... " '" ... '" 0 0 > '" ... ~ -'" ~ " '" "' ~ CO .... 0. '" ." '"
.5 ... " 0 '" '" CO -'" ... " 0. 0 '" .... ... <> 0 " ... CO ...
c.. ... ~ '" CO '" c.. .Q '" ,. Q "' c.. 0. CO c.. N .. '" Q .. ....
"
$
.... '" 0> '" ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~
U ';;; CO CO CO
.. .... .... .... .... ....
... " 0 0 0
.... CO '" '" '" " " " " "
CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO
0 <C <> <> 0 0 0 0 0 0
U
."
" 0 <> :g '" <> 18 ~ 0
... '" '" CO '" '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" ~ ~ "., CO ~ ~ '" ".,
" <> <> ~ <> <> <> ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.... "' ~ CO CO ~ CO ~ ~
~
> >
... ...
'" "
'" '"
.... '" '" '" 0> '"
0. CO '" .... CO ,~ CO .... CO
" '" CO CO '[
Q ... '" ~ ... ... ... > ~
'" ~ " " " " "
... " " " 0 "
CO CO '" CO CO CO '" CO
'[ 0> '" '0, S '"
0> ~ CO 0> '" CO '"
CO .. CO CO CO '" CO
'" '" CO '" '" '" '" U '" '"
'" '"
CO
CO '" .~
... CO .;; "
0. 0
" .. CO ." >
'" '" .... '[ " ...
CO U .... "
'" ." '" " '" ~ '" '"
." CO 0. " ,~ CO
CO CO '" CO CO .... '~ C
'" '" CO u
>. CO '" CO " 0>
'" ... ,. -'" '" CO CO .. '~
CO '" 0. 0 '" 0 ... ~
U ~ c.. 0. ... '" "
... > .... ';;; 0. 0 ."
" CO " '" .;; U ~ ...
" '" '" 0 " .... CO ." '" 0. '"
CO -'" .... ,~ ... CO .. CO CO CO
'0, U CO 0 .... ~ '" ...
'" ~ '" -'" ... '" '" CO " ...
Z CO 0. " CO CO CO CO .... "
::2 '" c.. " 0 0 .g> ~ " " '"
." CO U ... ~ ~ CO CO
~ " .... ';;; " ~ 0.
'" ~ CO ~ N '" .;; > > " '" CO
~ U '" CO CO ... ." " U CO CO
'" .... " '[ '" '" CO '" " ~ '" '"
0 ... ~ .... U '" ~ '" ';;; " ~
.... 1i ~ u .... .;: ~ - ~ 0.
" " U U u :~ ." CO ."
Z X '" ... ~ ... " > " CO .g> CO > ."
<> '" '" .... " 0. -'" ~ '" CO CO
~ <C '" '" '" '" U U U '" --' ~ U '"
'"
'"
>-
'"
0
w
I- ~
'" ...
0 0
'" '" '"
~ '"
>- " U
~ '" ~
'" >
.... >. ~ ...
'" ... -'" "
~ '" 0. ~ 0. '"
'" 0. '" ... " U u
X ... 0 0 '" .:;
I- '" '" '" ... .:; CO
Z 0 '"
;: .... ;:: .;;
'" '" 0 '" '"
--' '" " " -'" 0> CO " " CO
::> .S .... .... c.. CO OJ .... '"
'" ~ '" '" ~ ;:: '" CO ...
Z ... ... .... CO 0 "
0 U U CO " ... U U "
U Z '" 0 0 ." '" '" '" '" 0 CO
'" '" " ;:: CO 0 '" i:'
.... ... '" '" CO ... 0 , '" '"
CO 0 <C <C 'e 0 " U CO <C ... CO
~ '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '"
0> ;:: CO CO CO .... >. ...
~ CO .. '" " CO 0 .... " CO ...
CO " 0 ." ~ .... 0 U " ~ "
~ '" '" " '" ... .... ~ '"
~ CO '" ." '" ... CO ~ '" ~) ,,1.5
0 0 " CO " '" '" '" 0 ...
~ U '" '" '" ~ '" CO '" '" U U ....
0> .c "" " >. iij
" u " " ~ ""
" '" ~ u ~ ~ "
c '" '" c W 0> ~ ~ -~
" c ~ 0> '" ~ % 0 " ~
'" '" " ~ ~ "" 0 ~ ~
Q. ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ 0 ~ 0> ~ ~ ~
~ " '" '" ~ ~ " " ~
~ " ~ " "' ~ ?1 0> 0 '" 0> ~ U '" ~ '"
"" 0 " 0 '" ~ !j "' " ~ .c " 0 " " "
c ~ " '- '" " ~ u -~ '" '" .... ~
'" ~ 0 c. 0 ~ ~ 15 '- c ~ '- c c u .... u
'" ~ ~ " '" '" 0 ~ '- Q) Q) 0 Q. d '" Q)
~ Q) 0. ~ -~ >. '- ~ 8. ~ :!! ~ -~
" -~ "" " " ~ ~ ~ " ~ 15 0 c. ~ 0
.,. ~ ..: Q) ~ 0 > " " 0> Q) " '" c. ~
- > c " ~ ~ " 0 '" ~ ~ u ~ '" ~ c.
~ ~ 0> ~ ~ ~ " '" c .; "" ~- '" 0
0> " 0> '" " '" ?1 '" .= " ~ .c
" '" ~ .c ~ ~ '" .= ..: "" -~ " u '" ~ 0 " '" 0 U
0> " U 0 ~ " " ~ > " '- '- ~ '" 0> "
'" ~ " " ~ '" ~ '" ~ '" <C ~ .c ~ % C. " > ~ " '"
0. 0 '" > u 0 '" .... ~ '" .... ~ " '- <X
<X ;:: " " 0> '- Ii '" ~ 0 0
~ ~ -~ ~ ~ Q) " ~ Q) '- ~ '" ~ .; c. ~
~ u '" ~ u " 0> " '- '" ~ '- u '" " u E Q)
-~ Q) .= Q) .... ~ " -~ .!!! " '" '- '" '" Q) "' 0> " " ~ ~ ~
-~ " ~ -~ -~ " ~ c. "" 0 -~- -~ ~ 0
~ 0 '" 0> U ~ 0 0 '" - '" ~ " 0 '" '- 0 on ~ 0 > > "" u
" '- > '" 0 '- '- Q) 0 " '- 0 '" 0 '- 0 Q) '- " " " '" 0
0 0. Q) '" '" C. 0. 0. "" ,. 0. ~ ~ 0. ::c - .... 0. '" 0 c. " <X '" '" ~
Q)
$
-~ Q) -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~ -~
~ -!" 0>
u "
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ .., ~ ~ ~ ~
'- 0
~ " " Q) 0> " " " " " "
" " " " " " " " " " "
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
w
""
" '" 0 - on ~ 0 '" ~ 0 '"
'- 00 '" '" 00 '" 00 '" 00
- - - - - - - - - -
% - '" 00 - - '" '" on - ~
0 0 - <:> 0 0 - - 0 -
" - - - - - - - - - -
~ - 0 '" 00 - :=: '" ~ '" <:>
'" - - - -
0
~ 0> 0> 0> 0>
C. " -0; " -0;
~ 0> 0> 0> -[ ~ '- '- > 0> 0>
-0; -0; " " !J !J " " -0; -0;
0> " " 0
" " " " " -0; -0; " S " "
-[ " " " -0, " "
.!!! .!!! '" 0> 0> 0> .!!! .!!!
" " " "
% 0. 0. 0. "' "' "' "' U 0. 0.
~
~
U
0> 0> "
" " -~
0
" " '-
" " c.
'" '" 0>
0> "
C. c. -0;
"
"" "" ~ "
" " 0> " '"
'" '" " "
" 0.
'" 0> " " '- 0>
Z " 0> 0> " ';;;
- " "
<X " '" '" -0; " ~
- " " " " "
% '" .!!! "" "" 0> ~ ~
0> 0> 0> " 0 ~ 0>
23 ~ " " " 0. -~ -~ "' >. -0; "
'- " ~ 0
~ " " " " '- ~ ~ 0> " -~
c. " " " ~ ~ ~ -; "" "
z x '" .!!! .!!! '" '" '" '" '" >
0 "' '- '- Q) 0 "
~ 0. 0. 0. ~ ~ ~ u <> '- 0. "'
"'
<X
>-
'"
0
"'
~
<X
0
~ ~
>- "
I "" ~
'" '"
0 u u
u
=> ~ oS oS 0
~ '- '"
0 '"
~ ::c <C
z ~ ~
<C .... .... ""
~ 0 0
-' 0> i6 .c .c Q)
=> " ~ ~ " " '- "
~ ~ Q) Q) Q) " >. ~
z '- ~ .., ~ ~ ~
0 '" '" '- '- oS
u Z % Q) Q) i'.'
::c u u % % U
.., '- 0 0 ~ ~ '" '"
" 0 "" "" "" d '" '" , '"
- '" .... " " " ~ '"
'" ~ '" '" '" ~ <C <C '- .::
- " .c .c Q)
00 " 0 ii ,,; .c "" "" '" '" ~
- '" '" >. '" "" "" .., Z6;'~
- " '" '" '" '- '" '" " " ~
0 0 Q) '- '- '- '" % % " " Q)
- U <X '" '" '" % .., .., -' -' -' '"
~
a>
0>
..
~
'"
z
-
:=;
~
a:
o
~
z
o
~
"'
a:
>-
'"
o
"'
>-
a:
o
'"
>-
~
:E:
=>
'"
>-
z
""
>-
--'
=>
'"
z
o
u
-
'"
-
'"
-
-
o
-
~
a>
~
~
o
a>
$
~
u
..
I-
~
C
o
u
."
a>
I-
~
a>
~
..
o
~
e.
a>
o
0>
C
'S:
~
a>
~
~
I-
a>
e.
x
"'
!!
..
z
~
c
..
~
~
~
c
o
u
."
C
..
~
$
I- ~
~ ~
~ c
'b ~
>
c 0
0> l-
e.
~ "
a> ._
."
C
0>..
C I-
- ."
~ E
I- 0
~ ~
'" ~
.~
~
a>
C
o
'"
'"
-
N
o
-
<0
0>
C
I-
a>
a>
C
0>
C
"'
0>
C
.~
>
I-
~
~
C
0>
~
a>
."
0>
C
I-
a>
a>
.1=
0>
C
"'
0>
.1=
C
C
:!.
e.
> ."
C
U ..
."
..
o
'"
I-
o
X
0,
C
I-
~
I-
o
4-
C
o
~
..
a>
a:
0>
C
I-
a>
a>
C
0>
C
"'
."
C
..
~
..
Z
0>
.~ -g
C a>
C ~
.. ~
'Q."
I- ~
a> ~
~ C
~ !!
~ ~
U
o
~ ."
~ C
;bo
.. ~
.~ ~ g
4- I-
4- a> ~
.. ~ C
I- 0
~ '" u
C
.~
~
a>
."
.~
~
a>
C
o
18
-
N
-
-
...
u
a>
a:
..
~
'"
I-
..
~
0>
.1=
C
C
:!.
~
-
a>
I-
~
~
u
a>
;<;:
s=
u
.1;:
a>
e.
..
u
~
."
C
..
--'
~
a>
~
..
u
o
~
~
""
~
~
~
0'
."
I-
o
Z
0>
C
C
C
..
e.
~
I- ~
a> C
t: ~
~ u
o 4-
Uu1"CU~
... c......
CIJ .~ CIJ en
~
0>
.1=
~
a>
!!
~
;b~
.. u
C ~
.. I-
~
a> ~
.~ s
'" u
.~
~
a>
C
o
'"
'"
-
...
N
-
<0
u
a>
a:
..
~
'"
I-
'"
~
0>
.1=
C
C
..
~
-
a>
I-
~
~
u
a>
~
s=
U
I-
""
a>
e.
..
u
~
."
C
..
--'
~
"
~
..
u
o
~
~
""
..
""
--'
~
C
o
i
s=
>-
'"
~
z
~
0>
C
~
"
!!
0>
.s .~
~
I- ~
" "
." U
I- 0
o l-
e.
"
~
'"
~
'"
C
s=
~
.:;:
;b
::: ~.~
"" u ~
0>
.1=
~
~
0>
.1=
o
0>
C
o
o
0>
-
~
N
-
'"
0>
C
C
C
..
~
~
"
>
"
a:
..
~
C
!!
C
o
I-
>
C
"'
~
I-
..
:E:
0>
0>
"
~
C
o
~
..
."
'0...
N ~
" "
e. >
.. c
I-
~>- '"
~ s= '"
;~~~
$.. g c?6 .~
~ 0 ~
0' U U
" ~
$.. .~ ~ ~
~ .. c
" s= 0
o u u
.~
~
"
is
0>
'"
-
~
-
'"
0>
C
I-
"
"
C
0>
C
"'
0>
C
1;7
>
I-
~
'"
."
C
..
--'
."
C
..
-
>
u
~
"
~
.~
u
o
~
~
""
..
~
~
o
I-
~
m
-
X
c
"
'"
~
I-
"
.c
o
a:
1;7~
> C
I- '"
~
~ e.
0>
C
~
C 4-
.. 4-
..
e.I-
~
C
,~
~
"
."
"
I-
:g,!"
" 0
I- ~
~ ~
.~
~
"
c
o
o
'"
-
o
N
-
-
-
0>
C
I-
"
"
C
0>
C
"'
."
C
..
1;7
>
I-
~
~
C
0>
~
"
."
0>
.1=
I-
"
"
.1=
0>
C 0>
" C
C
C
> ..
u e.
~
"
~
..
u
o
~
~
""
..
~
~
o
I-
~
m
-
X
C
"
'"
~
I-
"
.c
o
a:
u
~
~
C
~
a>
I-
0>
..
."
C
..
~
~
u
~
~ '" ~
C I- C
';0 i 8
I-
." a>
I-
..
e.
"
I-
~
s=
u
a>
~
o
"
0>
0>
C
o
0>
C
o
o
'"
-
-
o
-
N
>
"
o
~
u
~
C
~
o
"
>
a>
."
"
a:
C
"
~
~
I-
"
e. ~
x ~
" u
..
'";0 ;;
o>c
" 0
--' u
C
o
~
~
~
..
I-
"
~
s=
u
a:
C
~
:E:
."
I-
..
e.
e.
"
s=
'"
~
+'
C
~
>
o
l-
e.
.s
~
'"
,~
I- _
I- "
.- C
C
. ..
0> s=
C U
."
.. e. "
E ~ ~
~ C
C ."
.. C '"
.. I-
~ -."
.~
~
"
C
o
'"
'"
-
~
o
-
'"
0>
C
I-
"
"
C
'0,
C
"'
~
c
..
+'
~
~
C
o
U
0>
.1=
I-
"
"
C
0>
C
"'
..
I-
"
C
"
'"
~
+'
C
..
+'
~
~
C
o
u
z
>-
:>
0> ."
C C
a>
C ~
C ~
'" '"
c~o..
o > ~
I- I- +'
~ " C
II) ~ ~
~ ~
g
."
~
C
~ 0
;b~
.. u
Iii C
~
a> ~ ~
~ C "
VI 8 ~
.~
~
"
C
o
-
0>
-
'"
o
-
~
u
~
..
~
'"
I-
'"
~
0>
C
C
C
..
~
-
"
I-
~
~
u
"
~
s=
u
.1;:
"
e.
..
u
~
."
C
..
--'
~
"
+'
..
U
o
~
~
""
."
C
..
"
'"
~
C
..
:>
~
0>
C
e.
I- 0
o
4- "
>
C "
..."
e.."
C
" ..
0>
.. C
: ~
I- ..
." U
.. s=
e.
" ..
1;; !;,
e."
~Qj
~ >-
~
e.
a>
'"
"
"
~
"
0>
..
.1=
..
I-
o
.~
~
"
C
o
18
-
-
o
-
-
0>
.1=
I-
"
"
C
'0,
C
"'
0>
C
I-
"
"
C
0>
C
"'
~
c
!!
~
~
"
~
~
""
~
"
+'
..
U
o
~
~
""
C
..
."
X
~?';/7
~ .....
'" ..
oo ~ ~ ~
.. > .;; <- <- <- ~
Q. <- .;; 0 0 ..... ..... 0 ..... ~
"0 " oo 0 - - <0 " oo - u ';
oo ~ .. ..... u .. "0 '"
.. '" c. >. '" <- '" oo oo oo ~ .~ .0 ~
oo oo ..... oo 0 oo .. oo '" .. ..... 0
'" 0 u u - 0 ..... ..... u <- <- <-
oo u .~ .. ..... ~ .<= ~ ~ .. '" .. c. 0 "
oo ..... - '" .. ..... c. ..... 0 u <- - .....
<- .. u - ~ ~ ..... ~ '" oo ~ .!: ..... oo ..... ..... <-
gj .!: " - oJ ~ ~ .. oo oo '" ..
<- .. ~ ~ !ij " '" .. i1! "0 oo <- 0 ~ oo "
'" oo - ..... <- "" '" oo 0 '" ..... oo oo '" U 0-
~ ~ ..... .0 .. ~ 0 <- "0 oo '" 0 ..... .. .....
'" - oo oo c. '" " <- <- .;; c. oo c. e; ~ <- '"
oo 0 0 " ~ ~ 0 "0 ~ U .. ~ '" 0 .<=
'" '" u ~ ~ 0- .. .. '" <- oo <- <- .. ~ ~ ..... '" i1! <- w '" ~ .....
'" >. oo <- <- " <- c. .. ~ " ..... oo <- "0
.. ..... ..... "0 .~ 0 - "0 C. ..... C. - " oo '" " "0 - <-
0- oo oo ~ 0 '" oo oo oo " ..... 0 <- ,;; " 0 ..... > oo 0 '"
~ .. ~ "0 oo .. '" '" '" <- oo ~ c. .. " .. .....
"0 .<= ..... ~ 0 u u ~ .~ .;; ..... ..... .. ..... oo <- '" .....
~ ~ oo u ~ .!: ..... - ~ .. <- u <- u .. :;; ~ .!: .!!
.~ ~ .~ E '" .. " c. ~ '" .!! " ~ '" <-
" ~ ..... C. "0 ~ <- 0- "0 ~ .. oo C. "0 <- 0 " ~
..... ~ .. ~ 0 53 ~ .. <- 8.~ c. " 0 0 oo <- 8 .~ .0
.3 ~ '" ~ ..... .:; <- i 0 N '" or .<= 0 <- .. <- i1! .. i!!
"" - ~ '" '" <0 U >- ~ u '" " c. u c. ~ u ~ z
'"
$
..... .~ .~ '" '" .~ '" '" '" .~ C>
u .!: oo .!: oo oo oo
~ ..... ..... .:; ..... ..... .:;
0 0 0 0
..... '" '" C> C> '" C> C> C> " C>
oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo oo
0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0
U
"0
'" <0 <0 ~ ~ <0 <0 <0 ~ ~
<- C> 0> ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0>
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
'" N en ~ ~ 0> ~ N en <0
N <0 <0 <0 ~ <0 N ~ N
'" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..... en '" ~ N <0 ~ <0 ~ .,.
.. ~ ~
<0
> >
<- <-
" <- '"
'" " '"
..... C> C> C> .....
C. oo oo .!: ..... oo .....
" oo " oo
<0 <- <- <- > > ~ > u > ~
" '" " '" " " '"
C> " '" " <0 <0 <0 '" <0
oo oo ,!: oo '" <- ~ C>
~ ~ .. ~ " ..
<- C> C> C> oo ..... oo
oo oo oo .. .. ..
'" w w w u u .: u z '-' .:
"0 <- oo
oo 0 .~
.. -
m .....
~ ~ '" ..
'" <- ..... ,~
> u ~ ~
<- ~ <-
" > ..... <-
~ <- -
'" 0 ~
.: '" ~ "0
oo
C> oo "0 U ..
C> 0 oo oo '" '" C>
oo ~ 0 .. oo
'[ " ..... '" u C>
"0 U ..... '" >- ..... oo oo oo
'" '" .. u oo .. oo
'" C> C. !;: C> oo X ~ oo :!. ~
oo .!: ~ oo .. '" '" ~
.:; oo 0- ..... 0- '"
'" C> <- <- '" C> .!: u
z oo " .0 '" ..... <0 .. <- ';;j 0
w " oo .. '" oo <0 oo i!! <-
e; oo 0 .<= .!: .,. .. .. ..... c.
" ..... '" i1! N .: c. oo
'" ~ oo '" ..... '" '" '" '" ~
'" Ii oo C> u oo ~ >. Co <-
..... " oo e '" w " ..... .. i1!
<0 <- ~ oo "0 W <- U m 0
"- " ~ oo ..... z " ~ <-
c. '" oo ~ ~ > C. "0 ..... ~
z x ~ > .. oo " > 0 '-' 0 oo ~ >
<0 W ~ 0 0 <- w <- .. >. oo "
~ "" u c. '-' '" '-' 0- Z 0- ~ ~ w '"
w
'"
,..
'"
c::J
W
>-
15 ~
'" '"
,.. .....
~ "0 .:1
.. u
0 0
.: ~
=> ~ ~
'" <- <<
0 ..
>- "" "0 .:
z oo
;:!: .. ~ :=
~ ~ ~
~ '" '" " oo .. '" .. "
=> oo ..... ..... 0 c. oo oo '"
'" ~ .. .. ~ >. 15 ..
z <- ..... oo 0 ..... c. 0
<0 U U oo 0 '-' .. '-' ..
'-' z '" 0 0 .. .<= u u U "0
~ ~ ~ ..... .: <- ~ "
..... <- ~ ~ .;; oo .!! "0 oo oo
oo 0 "" "" " ~ oo 0 .~
~ .. - ~ ..... - .. ~
'" ~ oo oo oo "0 ~ "0
~ oo .. .. 0 " .: <-
'" " 0 "0 :=' '-' ..... > '-' ..... .. .....
~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... .<= "
~ oo .. :;:; .~ oo '-' " .. U "0 t.3~/J>
<0 0 " w .. oo
~ '-' '" "" "" '" '-' ~ Z 0- 0- '" =>
" "
" .~ '" +'
0 " +' '" '"
'" ~ '" " '" "
+' " .. " '" '" " 0. g> ~
u " '" +' V> ~ "
" U +' " " " " .c
'" 0 u .~ ~ .... u " '"
0 I- " 0 '" " '" u
I- 0. ..., .<= >. - " +' .... l- I-
0. 0 0. +' 0> ~ 0 ~ " '" "
0 I- '" '" .~ 0.. 0 .; +'
" +' 0. I- U " ~ I- .... .=
~ 0> 1! ;::. " '" '>. " 0
~ '" 0.. ~ ~ " ~
- 0. " '" " '" "" +' '" '" " ~
'" '-' " 0 ~ " 0.. ~ " '" 0 "
0> " '" " '" V> '" ~ 0> 0> ~ "
" " " -;;; I- ~ 0- " I- '" +' " 0
0> " 0> '" " > i:' .<= +' 0 " '" " ...,
'" -'" I- " > 0 " u " I- " .... '" I- .... "
0.. I- ~ " I- '" " +' '" " :E '" 0> 0
0 0> '" > +' l- +' " '" '" 0. '" 0> 0. '" "
~ " " +' 0 '" +' :~ '" I- " " +' " " +'
~ ~ ~ " .... .~ u " e 0. ._ U I- '" '" '"
" -;;; +' ~ " -'" 0> " " 0. " 0>
.... > .<= " -'" :;; ..., " " " " " ..., " "
+' .~ '" l- +' $ I- 0 " " '" l- +' '" 0 '" '" .... +'
is I- " 0 " l- I- I- .= I- " c.~
"- '" V> ~ ~ 0. 0. 0. '-' "- V> 0. 0.. '"
"
$
+' .~ 0> 0> .~ .~ .~ .~ .~
u " "
'" +' +' +' +' +' +'
I- 0 0
+' " 0> 0> " " " " "
" " " " " " " " "
0 e e CO e CO CO CO CO
'-'
'"
" '" - 0> '"
I- 0> 0> 00 0>
- - - -
'" 00 ~ '" -
- N N '"
" - - - -
+' N '" 0> N
'" - -
e
>
I-
"
V> 0>
+' 0> 0> !ij
0. " .~ +' .~
" .;: " l-
e I- ~ 0> 0> > I- ~
" " .~ 0 " "
0> " " l- e " "
" " .~ 0> " 0.. " I-
:~ .0, '" " ~ 0
0> " ~ ~ 0> +'
" " '" '" " :;!
'" '" '" :E 0.. 0- '-' '"
~
" -;;; 0>
.~ "
+'
> " 0. U
I- " ~ " "
" 0> 0 '"
~ I- "
~ 0 0>
0> " I- "-
" '"
> +' ~
+' U " " '" +'
.... " ~ U
'" .<= - u .;:
S- o. 0> " "
'" '" " 0 0. +' ~
l- V> ~
0> 0> S- " 0> +'
" " > .~ l- e I-
'" " " 0 "
co I- 0> " " '" " .... +' 0.
Z " " '" " " "
" 0> " " '" ..: ~ "
g; " ~ 0> " 0 0 c.
" " " 0> 0> "
'" ~ 0> > - .~ +' +' :E ~ 0
" l- +' 0> '" '" " "
'" +' '" " +' .~ ~ N +' ~ +' ~ +'
e I- ~ " " U ~ '"
"- Ii ~ " " " " "" .~
'" " " ~ '" '" ...,
Z " .;': " $ ~ " 0> U " 0 '" +'
e '" '" 0 I- '" '" I- "
~ '-' ~ 0.. U '" .... ~ 0.. '" ~
'"
>-
'" 0>
"
e 0> I-
'" +' "
>- ~ I- .c
'" " +' " "
co e ~ 0. " "
V> " 0 " .~ ~
U U '-' '"
>- - - +' '"
~ '" > .<= '" '" '"
'" S- o. '" '" I- ""
0 " '" 0 ~ +'
:E V> I- ~ "
=> -'" co -'" -'" '"
V> S- O> - l- I- " .g>
0 .~ +' 0 0
>- '" ~ " '" '" ~ "
Z +' ~ e
<< .... > "
>- 0, '" I- $ 0, ~
~ S- " 0> " " "
=> " e V> " " +' U ~
V> ~ '" "
z l- I- i:' I- '"
'" U " I-
'-' Z '" '" '" '" '" I- '" 0 "
" " " " ~ "- '"
+' I- " " " S- ..., S- ~
" 0 .e .e .e 0 0 << -;;; .,:
- '" .... .... ....
0> +' a; "" .;!- I-
- " " " " " " 0
00 " 0 +' +' +' 0 0> 0 U ~
- ~ ~ " " " ~ " ~ +' Z3~ 19
- " '" '" '" '" '" "- .<;. '" " "
'" 0 " " " " " '" " "
- '-' '" => => => '" '" V> '" '-' :E V>
E
~
'"
"0
QJ
I-
~
"" ~ ~
"" '"
QJ QJ ~
~ "0 I- ~
~ -
::: ~ QJ
~ ~
QJ " "
0> 0> '" ~
'" 11 ;t' I-
"- QJ
~ C.
~ ~ ~ x
u " "
oi!! " 0
o~ U ""
~ 0 .Q ~
~ I- ~ 0'0
Q "- ~
QJ
$
... o~
U
'" ~
I-
~ QJ
" "
0 <>
U
"0
QJ <>
I- a>
-
'" ~
<>
" -
~ <>
'" ~
Q
~ :rl
c.
QJ '"
Q
0> ""
" ~
~
o~ I-
'"
'" "-
QJ
I-
~
~
U
QJ
:::
""
u
I-
'"
"
c.
'"
u
'" ~
Z "0
g; "
'"
QJ --'
'" ~ -
0>
'" ~ "
Q I-
"- 8- "
"
z X ~
<> w
~ "-
w
'"
>-
CO
Q
W ~
>-- I-
'" QJ
<> C.
V> X
W
>- -
~ "0
'"
0
:E ~
"
V> I-
0
>-- :<
z
;::
--' a>
" "
V> ~ I-
Z
<>
U Z '"
~ I- U
" 0 ""
~ '" ~
a> ~
- " ...:
CO ~ 0
~ ~ ~ j.3..2D
- " '" '"
<> 0 QJ
~ U '" :<
October 22, 1991
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John D. Goss, City ManagertJ ~
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreatio~'
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Use of consultants and contractual services in Parks and
Recreation
This is to inform you that many of the contracts administered in
the Parks and Recreation Department are supported by funds
generated through a variety of sources, other than the general
fund. For example, instructional classes for our recreation
programs are supported by fees. Maintenance services provided for
our Open Space Landscape Districts are supported through
assessments.
In other cases such as landscape architectural services, monies are
secured from a variety of sources such as State Coastal Conservancy
and state Parks and Recreation grants.
In a staff analysis of the Citywide consultant and contractual
Services summary, it has been determined that approximately 80% of
the services provided to the Parks and Recreation Department have
no direct fiscal impact to the City. Of the remaining percentage,
16% of the contractual services were supported by Redevelopment
funds, Community Development Block Grant Funds and Residential
Construction Tax, and the remaining 4% from the General Fund.
contract. i10
)}/) \
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEHEHT /j '7,1
Item ~--fj'~-7;Ql'I
lleeting Date ....__.~.,n H'[>~~
~~~~~i~ants :~~~lntr~gtual!~~~~~s use of
John Goss, C~ty MJJ.n:;~j:P~~-"-' .... .
Dawn Herring, Budget Manage~
ITEM TITLE:
REVIBWBD BY:
SUBKI'l"l'ED BY:
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_ RO-A-)
Council Referral Ro. 2381
At the July 23, 1991 City Council meeting, Council requested a
report on the City's use of cOl.1~ul tJ'..Dt.IL~nd service contracts.
This report represents a broad review of all existing contracts for
services required ci ty-wid.e, regardless of contract costs. In
addition, several recommendations for further study are requested
to be formally referred to the City Manager. Also attached is a
memo responding to the request by Mr. Joseph Garcia regarding an
alleged City contract with Steven A. Malcoun.(Attachment VIII)
---..---." ,
RECOMMENDATION:
the referrals
necessary.
That Council: Accept the report, and approve
recommended, and provide further direction as
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: NIA
DISCUSSION:
The City of Chula Vista has historically taken advantage of
consultants and contractual services in order to provide a cost-
effective supplement to existing City staff and obtain expertise
not available within staff. The general philosophy has been that
high citizen demand and heavy workloads on a periodic basis do not
necessarily justify staffing up to that level permanently. It has
proven to be more cost effective to look at the realistic,
consistent level of workload in each department and to take
advantage of outside sources when the workload or demand goes above
those expected levels.
When the decision is made to hire a consultant or contract for a
specific service, that decision is closely reviewed by the
department in question as well as city administration. If the
contract amount is over $25,000, it is brought before Council for
their approval. This is done on a case-by-case basis, and each
contract is looked at individually. This report represents an
alternative approach to reviewing this issue in that all
consultants and contractual services contracts are being looked at
on a city-wide and department-wide basis.
~.rr M../--
d3A, /
Item -HI B',LJ
Jleeting Date 8/E8/H 1~)/9 /
This request by Council to provide a review of all consultants and
contractual services contracts has generated a voluminous amount of
data. In order to facilitate the Council's review of this issue,
this agenda statement will provide a narrative overview of the
data, citing examples of when the City has determined that city
staff is more appropriate, in addition to examples of when we've
determined that contracting for the service or hiring a consultant
has been a better choice.
This report is designed to provide detailed information regarding
the City's use of consultants and contractual services. After
Council has reviewed the report and the attached data, certain
issues outlined in the report will be explored further as part of
the City's normal budget process in order to ensure that the City.
is spending its money in the most cost effective way possible.
Attachments
Attached to this report you will find three summary listings. The
first (Attachment I) is a list of city-wide consultants listing a
total of 72 separate contracts which are currently in existence.
The second summary (Attachment III) is city-wide contractual
services which list 62 separate existing contracts and the third
(Attachment V) is a listing of 29 CIP related consultants and
contractual service contracts. Each of these summaries provides
basic information on each contract including; the name of the
consultant or company, the vendor number, what their particular
expertise is, the reason they were hired, the department they
predominantly work for, the date they were originally hired by the
City, what kind of contract it is, whether it is ongoing, a one-
time special project or an annual contract, what the consultant's
general duties are and some funding information.
Funding is divided in fiscal year 1992 by the amount anticipated
from the General Fund, the amount which comes from Redevelopment
and an "other" category. Also listed is the actual amount paid to
this consultant during the last fiscal year. The final entry on
the summary is a miscellaneous category which is used to clarify
the funding if an amount is listed in the . other " category or to
tie this particular contract to a specific project.
The second piece of data that is being included in this package are
the actual consultant and contractual surveys which were completed
by each department on each existing contract (Attachments II, IV,
VI) . These surveys represent a more detailed look at why an
individual or company was hired by the City, especially in relation
to why we hired them versus hiring City staff to complete the
project. When each department submitted this survey, they also
submitted a copy of the Council agenda statement and the contract
related to the consultant or company as well as any additional
2
1i t- 8';4 ,.,;J.
d3A ,.-;2-
Item
#Z/I
-enO/:>1 I~ftl
lleeting Date
pertinent information. Those attachments to the survey have not
been included in the Council packages s~nce the volumes of
information would not be logistically feasible to provide to each
Councilmember. However, copies of all of this information are
available at the Council offices.
Past Conversions to Contract or Citv Staff
Consultant and contractual service contracts are reviewed at many
different levels within the City. The first review is typically
done within the department requesting use of a consultant or
contractual service. That department is responsible for preparing
an analysis determining which type of service is going to be more
cost effective and forwarding a proposal to Administration with
their request. Typically these requests are done wi thin the annual
budget review process. During this budget review, a member of
budget staff completes a thorough review of the department's
request and analysis, provides their own review and analysis and
forwards the information to the City Manager. The Manager then,
looking at city-wide concerns and priorities, recommends to the
Council those changes in service level which he believes will most
benefi t the City. Contracts which are over $25,000 must be brought
before Council for approval. In this case, the agenda statement
will review the decision to enter into a contract and highlight the
pros and cons. Over the last four budget cycles, the Manager has
transferred some formerly contracted services to in-house staff.
Some examples of these include:
1. FY' 89 Sewer System Videoing: A 3-person crew was recommended
and approved to assist in the maintenance of the City's
growing sewer system. This crew is capable of video taping
City sewer lines in contrast to past practice of contracting
for this service. The two prior fiscal years the City paid
$75,000 for this service to a contractor. The cost of the
equipment was $134,780 and the crew was approximately $90,000.
This crew is also responsible for drainage channel cleaning so
staff costs for this purpose were approximately $45,000.
Comparing the annual contract cost to the cost of the crew
this crew paid for itself within 2.4 years. However, sewer
main breaks provide a good example where staff believes the
benefit is significantly higher.
Dealing efficiently with sewer main breaks can create
tremendous benefit both financially to the City and lessen
potential negative health impacts on citizens. A recent
problem discovered in the neighborhood of 4th and "H"
highlights the efficiency this crew has brought to the City.
The TV crew was able to quickly determine that there were
actually two sewer main breaks and pinpoint the exact location
of each in order to dig up only that portion of the street
that was necessary. In the past, when the crew was unable to
3
~ .;;Y- ~~
-23;q -"3 .
Item
./.Iz, g' /I
Silo, b 1~/11
Jleeting Date
use this service they would dig up large portions of street in
hopes of finding the main break. This was disruptive to
traffic as well as created excess work for the crews digging
the holes, repairing the breaks and filling them back in.
2. FY '89 Chip Seal: The efficiency of the Chip Seal operation
was increased dramatically with the addition of a new piece of
equipment, a self-propelled chip spreader ($68,799). With
this equipment, the need for outside contractual assistance in
the annual chip sealing process has been eliminated. The
annual miles of streets chip sealed has increased by 65% since
this chip spreader was obtained while the cost for this
program has remained fairly constant. .
3. FY' 90 Building Projects Supervisor: The posi tion of
Buildings Projects Supervisor was created and approved to add
a higher level of internal quality control and cost
containment on CIP projects. Previously, a subcontractor was
hired as a .Clerk of the Works. at a cost of 3-7% of the
construction cost. There are significant long-term savings
expected from the addition of this position. This will give
us an in-house capability to review architect renderings of a
project and follow the progress through to the final project
completion to maintain that the project's standards are
neither inadequate nor excessive.
4 . FY' 90 Plan Checking: A Plans Examiner was added in the
Building and Housing Department to reduce the use of
contractual plan review services provided from Esgil
Corporation and Willdan. During FY 88-89 the City spent
$206,081 on plan check consulting fees. During FY89-90
$203,566 was spent and then during FY90-91 when this new
position was hired the annual cost of plan checks sent to
consultants dropped to $38,829. The annual permits during this
time period dropped about 14% which compared to the 80% drop
in consultant costs still represents a significant savings.
5. FY '92 Data Processing: The status of the Data Processing
Manager was changed from contractual to City staff. The cost
of this contract had grown to an amount where it was
determined to be more cost effective to hire an in-house
person. First year cost savings are approximately $800,
however the long term benefits are seen as more significant
than the cost savings. In a similar vein, while having minimal
dollar impact, the City changed the contract for the Town
Gardener to an in-house position in order to provide better
control over the service being provided.
4
JL ~I - -? /1-1/
~;jA ~ ~
Item ~ 0/1
Jleeting Da.te---.J~ '~J191
Summarv Hiahliahts
Consultant SUDIIIIo!I.ry
The attachments include three sWlllllaries: l) Consultants 1 2)
Contractual Service 1 and 3) CIP Projects, which includes both
consul tant and contractual services related to CIP. On Attachment
1 (Consultant Summary), you will find a list of 72 total contracts
for consultants although some of these are separate contracts going
to the same consultant or company. A total amount being paid for
these consultants during FY 92 is estimated to be $2,591,348 which
includes the General Fund, Redevelopment Agency and Other funds.
This other fund category includes such sources as Developer Impact
Fees (DIF), developer deposits, grants and open space and
assessment districts fees. The General Fund total of $352,465
represents only 13.6% of the total. If you discount legal services
of $301,000, the figure of $51,465 represents less than 2% of the
total.
The following is a narrative review of the data on the Consultant
Summary, for more detailed information review Attachment I, then
Attachment II which is the actual survey form. Additional
information is available on request.
Attornev
Of the $352,465 which is paid for from the General Fund for
consultants, the bulk of it goes to the attorney's office
($301,000). A contract for Attorney service is for predominately
three (3) reasons. First, services required are fairly specialized
and must be completed in a very timely manner, such as the Jones
Cable litigation being conducted by Silldorf, Burdman, Duigan &
Eisenberg ($80,000). Second, the services required are extremely
specialized such as the SDG&E plant expansion litigation by Shute
& Mihaly ($48,000 General Fund/$48,000 RDA) and Bond Counsel
Services required by Engineering ($263,000 Bonds Sale proceeds).
Daly & Heft have been used for non-police tort litigation cases,
superior court and some eminent domain litigation which is
contracted primarily due to workload. The Attorney's office
workload is at such a level that demands for service cannot be met
with existing staff. (See Attachment VI)
It is recommended that the Attorney, with the assistance of Budget
staff, complete a cost benefit study on the feasibility of
increasing the Attorneys staff.
Buildina and Housina
As noted above in the section on past conversions from contracts to
city staff, the Building and Housing Department has reduced its use
of contracts significantly. Although $50,000 is listed as
5
~~S ~
d:$J-:J ~5"
Item
...fir ~A
rsl~U/::ll 1~!11
Keeting Date
anticipated to be paid for out of the deposit accounts, the actual
amount will vary depending on need. The contractual plan checking
is used predominately for cases requiring higher structural
complexity. An example is the Rohr project. This building uses a
unique structural application known as moment space frame, which is
actually a "soft' story. Because of the uniqueness of this building
it is more cost effective to hire a consultant that specializes in
this type of structure.
The department uses Willdan especially when soils analysis is
required, since they have expertise in this area which staff does
not have.
Community DeveloPment
Within Community Development, planning expertise is required at a
different level than what is typically done in the Planning
Department. An example is the use of Cinti & Associates, who were
hired to develop a conceptual plan, including design standards for
the Auto Park. In addition, the Bayfront project presents some
urban design issues where design and environmental sensitivity are
major issues. Cinti has a great deal of expertise in this area, an
expertise currently not available within city staff.
The use of Attorneys, such as Remy & Thomas, are required because
they are specialist in CEQA legislation compliance. Sheppard,
Mullin, Richter & Hampton prepare redevelopment contracts and
agreements which could feasibly be done by the City Attorney,
however, due to high workload in the Attorney's office this work
cannot be accomplished in the time frame required.
Torstan Environmental Sciences is used due to their specialized
expertise in the analysis of environmental testing. The City is
required to investigate and mediate environmental problems on any
property that is being acquired or which the City is participating
in the purchase. Examples when these services have been required
recently are the Otay Valley Road project, Auto Park and the
Bayfront.
Enaineerina
The Engineering Department requires the use of a variety of
consultants to supplement staff for expertise and due to heavy
workload and projects which must be completed within a specific
timeframe.
One consultant, William Harshman is used predominately for Sewer
Planning. Mr. Harshman is a retired senior engineer for the City,
with extensive knowledge of our sewer program and the metro sewer
program. His specialized knowledge is needed to assist in the
6
-~.~ Ti9-..~
cZi/1 r 4,
~ ?/J
&'!v,:iT I~AJt I
, 71
sewer program on a limited basis and he could not be hired as a
part time employee without jeopardizing his retirement.
Item
lleeting Date
The firm of Radie-Jensen is used as a Financial Consultant for the
issuance of bonds. Bond issuance requires very specialized
financial skills and the need is cyclical. Financial Consultant
opinions are also independent evaluations used in the sale of bonds
by potential bond purchasers and, therefore, it would be
inappropriate to hire in-house staff.
Municipal Finance Administration provides proje:t management
services for Assessment Districts. This servJ.ce is less
specialized, but it still requires special knowledge that only a
few people dealing extensively with assessment districts have
obtained. Also, the need for this function is very cyclical
depending upon the use of assessment districts and bond financing.
In addition to Community Development, Engineering also uses the
firm of Torstan for very specialized environmental assessments. A
one time project requiring this specific knowledge is the Paint Pit
Removal. This project has required ground and groundwater
contamination testing and liaison with the State at a projected
cost this year of $211,519, and $193,368 last fiscal year.
Assessment Engineering, a specialty of Willdan, is a required part
of the assessment district and bond financing program. The level
of work effort required in this area is very concentrated during
different time periods. It would require the addition of several
in-house staff with training in assessment engineering to carry out
the peak cyclical work load.
Finance
Wi thin the Finance Department you will notice $30,700 from the
General Fund to pay for the City's annual audit of its financial
and accounting records. This audit must legally be completed by an
outside, independent auditor and therefore no in-house staff could
be hired to perform this function.
Personnel
In the Personnel Department, $1,700 is spent on a firm which
specializes in employment law. Representatives of this firm have
provided employee relations training programs and other specialized
group training workshops for City staff to better prepare them to
administer discipline in a legally defensible manner.
Plannina
The Planning Department uses consultants to generally supplement
staff in areas requiring specialized expertise, or when time frames
7 ~A-l
.JIr / 814---'/
Item
#" 8" /l
8Jiv/~1 I~/"I
Meeting Date
are required for project completion which cannot be met with the
existing level of staff.
During the review of the FY 1991-92 budget, consideration was given
to a request by the Planning Department to add an Associate Planner
in the Advanced Planning Division to assist in working on major
projects assigned to that division. During budget review it was
determined that prior to adding any additional positions the
department should prioritized its projects and present that list to
the Manager and Council so that the Department's resources can be
utilized to meet the most important planning needs. Planning is
preparing a report for Council which will be presented in early
September and include many alternatives to the approach to staffing
and use of consultants.
During FY 1990-91 Council had authorized an additional Senior
Planner position in the Current Planning Division. Part of the
rationale for adding this position was to reduce the need for use
of consultants on review of large scale projects. This position has
been filled and this Planner has been assigned to one large scale
project (Baldwin-Telegraph Canyon Project). However there have been
several other projects filed since this position was filled which
necessitated the use of consultants. At the initiation of each new
project, Planning staff reviews the availability of in-house staff
to conduct the plan review. Any recommendation for use of
consultants is forwarded to the City Manager and the City Council
in conjunction with the approval of the consultant's contract.
There are three contracts with planner Bud Gray. Mr. Gray, a former
acting planning director with the City brings specific expertise in
city operations and development projects. Two of the contracts are
for specific projects, San Miguel Ranch and Eastlake. The Eastlake
project involves two separate SPA Plan amendments, one involving a
Kaiser medical center complex in the Village Center, and the other
involving a 152 dwelling unit density incre~se in the Eastlake
Greens project. Both of these projects are paid for from developer
deposit accounts.
The third contract provides for the backfill of one Senior Planner
currently assigned to the Otay Ranch project. The Otay Ranch
project was originally to have been only for one year, but has
since been extended for an additional two years. The planning
department originally tried to underfill this position with a lower
level contract planner, however, this proved unsuccessful.
The General Plan Amendment and General Development Plan for the
Otay Ranch Project will be acted on by Planning Commission and City
Council during FY 1991-92. Following adoption of those Plans, Staff
will be able to evaluate long term staffing needs for further
implementation of the Otay Ranch project.
8
~~
~Ari
Item
~8'~
lfeeting Date
~:!6,,,r /~/9'1
An expertise not currently on staff is a licensed architect. A
recent study deteDlined that there is currently not sufficient
workload to justify hiring a full-time architect. Douglas Childs
has been used to assist in developing the deliqn review manual
which will provide assistance to both city applicants and staff.
Another one-time project within Planning requiring specific
expertise is the sign abatement program, including the notification
and consultation on the City's sign rec: _irements. When the
specific project is completed, the or.-going work will be
transferred to the Current Planning section, and no additional
consultant assistance will be required.
Lettieri-McIntyre & Associates have been used to provide analysis
and reports required for Rancho Del Rey project review. All costs
a funded from developer deposits. The City has now completed
approval of SPA Plans and tentative maps for the entire Rancho Del
Rey Specific Plan Area. It is the Department's intent to deal with
any future implementation of the Rancho Del Rey Plan with in-house
staff .
An environmental planner has been hired to backfill the half-time
position assigned to the Otay Ranch project. As noted above this
project has exceed the time frame originally estimated. An
additional environmental planner has been contracted to assist in
alleviating the current backlog of environmental impact reports
(EIR). An additional Associate Planner will be hired during the
current fiscal year which should alleviate this backlog of EIR's
and reduce the need for contractual planners.
RBF has worked on the Salt Creek Ranch Project, which should
finalized this year.
Willdan, funded through the DIF has prepared the City's Growth
Management Plan. The $2,258 remaining in this contract will provide
for the printing of the final report.
Public Works/ Operations
The Operations Division is responsible for providing building
inspection and testing of construction materials of City projects.
The Redevelopment Agency will fund $10,000 required for testing of
materials related to the Youth Center Project.
Contractual Services
The contractual services summary (Attachment 3) includes 62
separate consultant service contracts, although some of these are
separate contracts going to the same contractor. The FY '92 costs
for these contracts is $4,302,729. Of this total amount, $230,036
is funded from the General Fund while $146,670 is from the
9
JIr~1~A-r.1
Item
~7/l
Jleeting Date
..a:lu/:H IP'/t/'I
Redevelopment Agency, and the remaining $3,926,023 comes from
other/special/restricted funds. In this case, other funds include
Transportation Development Act Funds which provide all funding for
the Transit Operations Program, Gas Tax Funds which provide support
for chip sealing, street sweeping and tree trimming city-wide,
Sewer Service Funds and funding from developer fees as well as fees
for services and revenue from the open space districts.
Communi tv Development
The CHIP program in Community Development has been operated by a
contractual employee, Anthony Ciotti. This individual is
approaching retirement and will likely be replaced by an in-house
employee beginning in FY 1992-93.
Property Management is an area that has been contracted
successfully. The cost is minimal in terms of the staff time which
would be required to manage City properties such as the El Dorado
building. In many cases the City does not hold on to this kind of
property for any length of time and it would not be cost effective
to hire and train staff to manage property.
Enaineerina
The Engineering Department is responsible for testing of materials
and inspection of CIP and subdivision projects. BSI is used
predominately on inspection of subdivision projects (paid by the
developer) while City staff works on all CIP projects and
subdivisions. One contract inspector was kept busy full time this
last fiscal year and the department is looking into the possibility
of requesting additional staff in the FY 1992-93 budget. The United
States Testing contract provides for materials testing on all
projects (subdivision and CIP) which must be completed by specially
trained individual in a laboratory. The City has neither the
trained individuals or the laboratory at this time. Although this
should be reevaluated as the city grows.
Librarv
The City contracts with a private security guard service to provide
security, crowd control and noise control within the Library six
days per week from October through June. Because of the unusual
hours and only partial year requirement for security services, it
has not proven cost effective to hire City employees to provide
this service.
The Library also contracts for interior plant care and landscaping
to plant the annuals in the Library fountain. These are two areas
which, as a result of this study, have been forwarded to the Parks
10
-Ii.," -~"9,/~
~/o
Item
~ (11
au07n I~/I?I
Jleeting De. te
& Recreation Department to determine if they may be able to take
over these services at a more reasonable cost.
Manaaement Services
The Management Services Department coordinates the process of
televising City Council Heetings. The $34,000 annual funding for
this program is split 50/50 between the General Fund (in the Non-
Departmental budget) and the Redevelopment Agency. In order for
City staff to accomplish this task, a large capital investment
would be required to obtain the appropriate equipment and train
staff in its operation. Since this service is used only on a
limited basis, it is not viewed as feasible to move in that
direction at this time.
The Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce provides general information
services to the general public by responding to walk-in, telephone
and mail inquiries about a wide range of city topics. The Chamber
provides information on visitor attractions, lodging facilities,
clubs and organizations, restaurants, recreation sites and
demographics. Several thousand inquiries are responded to each
quarter. The Chamber can perform this service at less cost than if
the City were to hire staff. The annual cost is split 50/50 between
the General Fund (in the Non-Departmental budget) and the
Redevelopment Agency.
The City's telephone system is supported through a contract to NEC
Communications who will repair and replace telephone equipment,
wire in new phones and provide some software assistance for the
programming of the phone system. This contract is listed
specifically because staff has determined that there may be pieces
of this contract which staff may be able to perform. During the FY
1992-93 budget review process, this issue will be looked at more
closely.
The Public Information Section of Management Services uses a
variety of contractors to assist in very specialized work products.
Por example, a photographer is used periodically for pictures for
the "Quarterly", brochures and special events. Also contracted are
typesetting and graphic design work to support various City
publications as well as technical assistance in video production.
Since these needs are infrequent, and it would require a large
capital investment for the equipment to provide these services in
house, it is not recommended at this time.
The City operates with a Unisys Mainframe Computer.
computer maintenance contract is more effectively
Unisys at a rate much less then hiring a City employee
The annual
provided by
and training
11
fi J' BS
,( }i) -11-
=<.!i~- /1
Item
~~/J
DII.O,,,.I: 1Pj,/11
lleeting Date
them in this specialty. In addition, the life span of these large
computers is approximately five years. When this one is replaced,
it is likely it could be replaced by a different brand of computer
or even by a combination of more powerful microcomputers. In lieu
of an uncertain future this is an area which continues to be more
efficiently contracted out.
Nature InterPretive Center
The Nature Interpretive Center contracts for maintenance, repair
and disease management for their aquariums. This annual contract
is $7,000 which is reasonable especially since the aquariums do not
currently require full time care.
The Nature Interpretive Center prints promotional materials that
are computer generated and require specialized printing
capabilities. The City does not currently have the ability to use
this computer-generated layout nor can they print at the resolution
required. If the City were to attempt to be able to accomplish
this kind of printing, the cost of the printer alone is more than
$100,000 and the volume of work needed does not justify that
purchase.
The Nature Center also contracts for their landscaping maintenance
and irrigation system repair. This issue has been forwarded to the
Parks & Recreation Department to review the needs of the Nature
Interpretive Center and to determine if this contract can be
converted to City staff.
Parks and Recreation
The Parks & Recreation Department is a prime example where services
are continually evaluated in terms of whether contracts or City
staff are most cost effective. Examples include the contract with
a pest control company in order to control gophers within the park
system. Gopher control is very labor intensive and staff formerly
trapped gophers, in fact they found 150 in one day at one park I
Since switching to a chemical application, a specialized license is
required. City staff does not currently have that license,
however, a parks employee is receiving training to obtain this
license so that this can be done in house in the future.
The golf course contract is listed in this category, although there
are no funds expended by the City for this contract. This is a
situation where the City actually generates revenue from this
contract. For this fiscal year it is estimated that $330,000 will
be generated by the operators of the golf course.
Personnel
12
~ r~ -/.;E
d~A//;L.
Item
-If;;- 't /I
.e;IO;~ IPII'~ I
lleetwg Date
The Personnel Department has very minimal use of contracts. In two
out of three cases the funds are provided from the Insurance Fund
to support the Employee Assistance Program as well as the Hearing
Conservation Program. Personnel Department keeps track of all
applicants for City positions through a SIGMA applicant tracking
system. Technical support of this system must be provided by SIGMA
due to copyright status maintained by the company.
Police
The Police Department has contracted since 1985 with South Bay
Community Services to provide counseling services for juvenile
offenders. Prior to this time, the City provided their own
counselors, but determined that it was much more cost effective to
contract for the services because the quality of supervision was
much improved. Subsequently, added to this contract has been
additional funds to provide outreach counseling for run away and
homeless youths within the City as well as a full time graffiti
coordinator to coordinate the phase of the City's graffiti program
which uses youths from the court system required to complete
community service hours to paint over graffiti on both public and
private property.
Public Works Transit
Within the Public Works's Transit Division, the largest service
which is contracted is the operation of the City's transit service.
This contract totals $2,240,908 for FY 1992. The contracting for
transit operations is recommended specifically because it is much
more cost effective to contract for this service. The contractor
is responsible for all operational aspects of the system including
the hiring of personnel, training, dispatching, road supervision,
vehicle maintenance and fare revenue collection and accounting.
This contract was originally entered into with ATC Management
Corporation in 1988 for three years and has been recommended to be
extended for an additional two years to expire on June 30, 1993.
The total cost of this contract is based on a per mile figure for
FY '91/92. It will be $1.79 per mile and in FY '92/93 that will
increase to $1.91 per mile.
Another City service which has become more effective to contract is
street sweeping. Because the City has no street sweepers, we would
not be able to accomplish this task without a large capital
expenditure. The contract provides for the sweeping of all City
streets and City parking lots as well as an additional contract
which is used during the annual chip seal program. The cost of
this contract can change at any time at the request of the City
since it is based on the frequency of street sweeping. Currently
13
-Ii ,J - - 8'/'1-7:1
-~:5Ii- /,3
Item
~ 1',1
8:16:31 IP/;./'I
, '/;
lleeting Date
the City sweeps residential streets every two weeks, and
commercial/industrial two to three times per week. However, should
the City decide at any time that we need to save additional funds,
this contract can be switched to any other frequency with no impact
on City staff.
Public Works OPerations
Tree trimming is also another good example of providing a service
in the most cost effective manner. In determining to contract for
this service, the City has looked at all types of tree trimming
that is accomplished by the City. It has been determined that it
is more cost effective to use the City trimming crew to handle
unique situations such as that where a tree root has grown to a
level that it has broken the sidewalk. Our tree crews will go into
a situation, work with the street crews to tear up the sidewalk,
remove the tree, replace the sidewalk and the tree crew will then
plant another tree. An area that has been determined to be more
cost effective to contract is the trimming of all street trees. A
contractor can come in to an area and trim by block in a much more
cost effective manner than City crews. One reason is that city
crews can be called off on other emergency types of operations.
Dualitv of Work Life proaram
The Quality of Work Life (QWL) program is operating with a Federal
Grant to expand the program into two new departments, Police and
Public Works, and to implement an additional city-wide committee to
address an issue such as development of a facilitator pool. Since
the grant is for only one year, it is much more cost effective to
contract for the services to meet the goals of the grant.
Capital Improvement Program
Consultants/Contractual Services
Attachment 5 lists all consultant and contractual services related
to the CIP program. This summary is listed by department with the
consultants listed first by department followed by the contractual
services. Within the CIP process the City rarely uses General Fund
support. Each CIP project requires a variety of expertise in
accomplishing the entire project from beginning to end. The
architectural planning up front, the property acquisition and
design of engineering projects and roadways require extensive use
of very specialized services .which are typically not available
within City staff. You will note in this year's CIP there is no
use of General Fund support. All projects have been funded from
alternative funds such as the Developer Impact Fees, gas tax, state
14
~ '8'/9 Ir-.
~y-1~/,/
Item
-tis ~.4
a:lil, "'~. l~hJ
lleeting Date
grants, Transportation Development Act, residential construction
tax and Community Development Block Grants.
ELr~'UKE ACTION
As part of the City's ongoing budget review and analysis additional
study will be undertaken during 1991-92 to determine if there are
ways to improve city operations.
1. Attorney/Legal Staffing
Review city-wide contracts for legal services and complete
cost benefit study to determine the optimum level of city
staff to contractual assistance.
Assigned to: City Attorney/Budget Staff
Results: To be included in FY 1993 Budget Analysis
2. Engineering Assessment District Project Management
Review use of consultants for project management for
assessment districts. Determine feasibility of training in-
house staff in this area
Assigned to: Engineering/Budget Staff
Results: To be included in FY 1993 Budget Analysis
3. Planning Use of Contractual Planners
Review use of Planning Department work which is contracted
and determine the optimum level of city staff to contractual
assistance.
Assigned to: Planning/Budget Staff
Results: To be included in FY 1993 Budget Analysis
4. Library Plant Care and Annual Plantings in Fountain
Refer to Parks and Recreation to determine is these tasks can
be accomplished by Parks staff.
Assigned to: Parks and Recreation/Library
Results: If feasible implement as soon as possible
5. Infox:mation Systems Phone System llaintenance Contract
Review of the existing maintenance contract to determine
whether selected areas may be assumed by city staff.
Assigned to: Information Systems/Building and Housing
Results: ,If feasible implement as soon as possible
6. Nature Interpretive Center Landscape llaintenance
Refer to Parks and Recreation to determine is these tasks can
be accomplished by Parks staff.
Assigned to: Parks and Recreation/NIC
Results: If feasible implement as soon as possible
FISCAL IMPACT: None with this action.
15
~. 7/1 ~.t&f
-.=<.>> ~- /.~
BlANK PAGE
~ ~ 8'-/1 ,/~
.~3-A,/b
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
8'13
10/01/91
ITEM TITLE:
Report Contractual/Consultant services providers
who earned $50,000 or more in anyone fiscal year
(FY 1985-86 to FY 1990-91)
SUBMITTED BY: Finance Directorlfl
Budget Manage~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~iL,('G (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_X_)
~,rj Referral No. 2405
At the August 20, 1991 City Council Meeting, Council requested that
staff prepare a listing of those firms (Consultants/Contractual
Services) who have received $50,000 or more in any given year since
1985. Also requested was a brief description of the work completed
and the hourly rate or method of compensation approved in the
contract.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept the report.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
At the August 20, 1991 Council meeting, a report was presented to
Council based on a survey of city-wide use of consultants and
contractual services. While this report was continued 30 days in
order'to allow Councilmembers more time to review the material,
Council requested some follow up information which would supplement
the survey and related materials. Specifically, Council was
interested in those Consultants and Contractual Service providers
to whom the City paid $50,000 or more in any given fiscal year
since 1985.
The data compiled includes Fiscal Years 1985-86 through 1990-91.
The hiring department, and brief description of duties and the
method of compensation and or the hourly rate are included for each
consultant. The data for this report was based on information from
the accounting system. In looking at one entry you will notice that
the duties, annual amount and method of compensation may include
more than one contract. Each entry represents the total paid to
that consultant or contractor for the fiscal year indicated.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None with this action.
. ~_/ -z'tJ-f-
. .
~ ~ ,;; j j
. .
hili hI.!! Ii
. ~- P" I I I
! ~ I.
;; & ~ & ! i !
. - .-
!~= !~= ~
~ ~ i
i - . . - . . ~ ~
-=- p;
F~ u
~ Ii .! !
-
i I!:!;: ~ N ;;: ~ ~
~~ :;. :;. :;.
i . . , . . ,
~-~ ~-~
~ ~ &'5 ~ &'5 r: ~ i ! !
~ ~ -
~ ~ IB~ IB~ ~ I! J~ h J~
! ! lk~ ) i~ ! ! !
I!I ! ! Iii 1.i I I I
! i.~ i~ i.~
! i ! ! ! ~~ ~~ ~~
- ~ [
\
~ I ~ ! g: 5! ~ i'; !II ~ i
0 . .
::i ci ~ ! .. ; i :i i
I ~ ~ N
~ ~ - i ~ ~ ; - ~ i ~
i ~
~ m ! t ~ !
~ ~ ~
~ . . i~ H B
~ 1 :: ~ ~
~ u u
~ . .. .. ,1
~ ~ ;;
:= i ~ . .
~ :;; :;; :;;
iI3~ ~ . . .
~g e: g g ~ ~ ~ i! i'! ;;11
~ u u . . . . .
~i . . I I I . 2' . 2' . 2'
Ii! u u ~ 2'- 1'- 1'-
~~ ~ 'E -11 it -11
- ~ h h h II;. II;.
:i:i . ! . - - -
1::- I e e e -I -I -I
;:I!I !:. ~ ~ ~ u J:E e;; e;;
f:i_ . ~ ~ ~ . ::;-; :;-;
~ K t ~ ~ ~ =i ~~ =i
d ~ ;; i .
I ~ < . . . x ~ x ~
. ~ I i - -
- ~ ! . .os .os .os
II 1 - - I
:;: ;; = . i! i! i!
~ ~ ~
I . . . <
1 ;: ;: i i i ~ E ~ E ~ E
i ~ . . I 11 11 11
~ i i I I
i ~ os u u J J ~
1 os os os 0;; os 0;; os 0;;
! ;; ~ :! j t. I" I"
u ;; ! !
:! . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ;; OIl. ::; .;
!5 . - .. ~ 1 U! Pi U!
H . l l l
~ ~ !
.
.s ~ -
u - . ~ - . ~ - . ~
i !
! Ii! i Ii Ii Ii II II II
I!j 2 i i i
~ ~ ~ .. .. ..
!! 11/ i i i i
I!i ! ! ! !
K
~ ~ ~ B ; I
u
.; ~ IE IE I ~ ~ ~
I I -
I I:: ! ~ t:1 !5 I I
5 ~
;:: ; ; ~
I ~ i
- ~ u u
~ ~ !i Iii 5 ~ ~ i:i i:i :;;
~ ~ II II
N 0
-
~
~g2 K$-;;'-
. . . Ii
j j j !
. ~ ~
K .;
f ~ ~ ~ .
- - - .:t1
IO! t.': t.': i.': i
; I!'~
~ 1!.i( 1!.i( 1!.i( ~ N
; -
~ t. H :! k .:
I ~ ~.;
f1! f1! f1! f .
i ~~ ~~ ~~ !~
;:: ~ . ~ . ~ .
I uf uf ur & & i ii i ~
~l ~l ~~ ~
: I . ! ! ~ i~ ~ g
L L i_ i JI JI ~- "
1$ d d d I I I lk I I
! &
Ie ~ Ie ~ Ie ~ ! ! ! I Ii ! I
-~ -~ -~ ~ ~
;/ ; Ii II! !!i ~ ie ~ ill ~ II!
~ ~ :Ii ~
iii ..; ~ ! N N ..; :!; iii
I :!: ., ~ ~ ::
~ Ii ii a: I: ii - ii ii ~ ~
;/ ! ~ ~ , i ~ ~
~ ! ~ I! ~
~ ~ ~ ~
0; :: & ! !
! ;;
~ ~r ,; ,; I ~ I
~ I!' ~ I!' s i
~ ;; ~;; ~;; ~ h ~
!' - . ~~ ~~ 0
~ -
III~ t~ i ,~ ~ ~ ~
'~ j :; !; & : - . .
trio ii ii . ..i! ~ ! &
=~ ;: ~ . . I
~i . i
i ~~ i~~ "~
lie H~ . H i
~~ s
=$ ip iB ip ~ - .11 ii ii
i ~ .i( ;; ~ !'
~- ~
u !-~ ~-~ !-~ ~ ~ j ~
;:1$ ~~ I I
ei_ .1: . l' .1: ~ ~
. ~ j ~-
~ " ~ ~ -~
!r~ [d [d [d . ~
~ i~
-~ 1!. 1!- 1!. J ~ ~ I. t I.
u ~ij t
U ~p lit s s ~ - ~ ~i ~!i
!' t r I
J .~ I.~ !1 . [
i.\i ~ ~ " ~ "
~ ~.:I . . Ej ~ ., I!' ~ r
~ ~ j~ t:; I.j.i! ~ ~ i.g- "-
~ j~ 1!';;
~ !; 1! .
!!i ~ . ~ ~ ~ '!; '!; '!;~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~.!!: ~ 0 . . . ~ ~ q
I.!!~ . ~ 0 & & &~
! ""Q.~ . - << &
u u ~ . ~ . H ;; ==
. . . ~ 1;; ~:I g .
1!-M 1!-M 1!-M . ~
!!i ~ i~ ~ i~ ~ i~ . H " ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t t .1 ..I ..I
.; ! . . . . ~1; 5'1s
t; ~ t; ~ - ~ ~ "
tJ -
I; ~ t:t
r >>: . i ~
Ii i II ~
~ ~ i i i I;
I!j II II II 2 I
!! ! i ! ; II!
- /:: ~ ~ !
z It U
- ~ ~
!;i ~ !;i I!: to!
~ ;/ ~ I; I;
~ ~ - ~ II!
I ~ ~ ~ S S II i I
~ II!
i i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ S 1;; i i II i
~ 8 ~ i! ~ ~ ~
N !I! .,
-
~
~3g3ff13-;;f--'
N
& . .
.-
-
. ~ ~
~
o ~
~ ~ .
S ~ ~
. .
i ~ g ..~
:;: ..
. ~ l!
. !
i i i ! I
~ ~ !
~ ~ i ~ i ~ t j, ~ Ii ~ -
w ~ ~ ~ b ~ ~~
. ~ )
i i i i i ~ Ii Ii j i s~
u u u u u u u .
~ ! ! I I I I 1 'I I I I If
I .II .II
! i i ! i ! .!! .!! ! i ! i ~
II! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. ~ N ::: - N Ie ~ i!i ! ~ ~
E ~ Ie 11 ~ Ii:
. ~ ::; 0 N
..; t ::! Ii ~ ~ ,.; Ii r;i ..
.. 0 - - Ii: -
I
~ III ~ 51 ;: II: 51 ~ 51 51 51 II:
;/ i! ! ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~
u
-
:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;: ! ! ! ! J ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ u ,!;
. . . :E
. ~ . ,!!.
~ ~ ~
j . ~
:= c i .
1! ] 1! ] . ~
1IiI~ . . ~ I ~
J,~ ! Ii ! Ii .
~ of of I I ~ .,
~!i! i " . " ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"E "E ~ ,!; ~
Ii i . .
~ ~ l ~ .
~8 It It ~ j ~ . ~
0 . . . ~ c ~ . 1< 1!
=g . . ~ 25
,!; ,!; ,!; ,!; t t .. .. ;; .
~- 'I; !
;!!5 i J .. .. .
.
~ I 1 I u u ~ ~ ~
~ I j ;: ;: 1 .
~ ~ ~ 10
_K ~ ~
;/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I
. . .. .. S .
i=:' c c c J J ~ .. i
:0.. l l . l. l i 1! Ii ~
~= ~!1 ~ :i I!; :i ~!1 . 1< 10 ~ I::
!II Ii Ii ~ Ii Ii ~ ,!; .. .. 25 i ~ ~ ~
><" ~ u ~ u ~ U ~ U ~ U U :; !:.~
Ii :;!' .; F i !' iF - - c C t . ~
- :;; :;; l! l! ~ It
~ 11:: '!I" i:: iZ: I t
; ;: ~of . . t .
8 ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . o . 'I; ~ H
! ~ ~ H ~ ~ q ~ ~
;; !! ! ~ .. I .
u " ~:: Ii . i- S . ~ . u .
~ . ~ f 0 0 i -II ~ u .
5 u ~ u ~ ~i . . ~ i ~!
..-II ..-II . H t ~ f
~ ..~ ~
~~ ~ 5'5 ~'O l . .
,,'I; ~ ~ . .
- - ~ .
- E - - II II
i ~ ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~ i j
f1i
II - - -
~ ;; ;; ;; ;; . . = ~ i II
I!I i II! I i II If !! II ~ . E
!! i i i 9 9 - - II!
- ;; ;; Ie I Ie ii
z E E 0 0 is ~ is ~
~
- - ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Iii - ~
~ !I I !i -
iii iii ~ ! . !i
;; ~ ~ ;; ~ -
. .
II! I I I - g
I II If Ii!
I " E ~ ~ -
; . f1i .,; ~
~ i II! ~ ~ - .: i .
~ ~ ~ ~ ii ii ~ ~ i w ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 8"13--1/
,~Jl3j!
~ ~ ~ ~ I
! ~ ~ ~ r ~r
L h ~t ~ i I I 1 t ~
~~ -=l::i a ~ i
~i ii ii ~ i i i ~ ~ ~ i
~~ 11 II ~ 1 1 1 i' ~ j
~~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ! ! i I B ~
;:I!; H H ~ ~ ~ ~ J! J! Ii i ~
!~ I! I! i II It II : ~i !! -i;~i.
~c - -.. _I' -!' _I' I - - ~
~_-_~ I] I] ~ ~i~' ~i ~ Ji ! :
;..._~ ;-_I!! ii _ ICJ>'" Q.
~ ~.. - ! fi fi fi ~ ~i ! i! ~~
~ !~ r~ r~ r~ ~ ~~ ! ~~ ~~
! =_"_8 =8 =~ ji ji ji i i~ ~ J~ I~
~ E~ s~ Ii !i !i !i i ii ! li It
c
.
~
=
.
~: ~: 8
~ ~ "
~! ~! ~
~ :~ :a- ~
..: .c ..c j
IlK .... '" L. till
. .
i ~~ ~~ i
- H ;1 ]I
i H ~ ~ ii
I!s Ii Ii k$
~ ~~ ~~ !!@
~ -'I- ......... _.
~
~
ill I
~ ~
I
Ii
,.;
:::
~
g
~ ~
~
~
t.= t::
.. i: .. k:
hh
;
~ Ii
I!i 2
Ii II>!
; i
;;; -
Ii
2
II>!
ii
-
~
! ~
~ I
<:: ~
~
~
'"
c
ij
~
. .
I!j II!
'? ;> ,..----
C7'~.t.3 <,)
t
ii
l
i,
t
i j j
]a ):1 )!
~ go t: ~ ~ r
....... ....... ... WoI
Co. o. o.
-:8 -,. -,.
@; @~ @~
.. "" ...... ......,
~. .c. .c.
...... ...... .. &.
.VI ...... 'i""
=i =j =i
1! r r
~t ~I ~I
,I.I! ,I.I! ,I.I!
~
,.;
~
::
11
S
~
~
~
~
IS
!
-
g
~
Ii
2
II>!
ii
-
Ii
I
~
~
I
u
Ii
I
~
~
!
~
-
!
~ ~ ~
t t i
. . .
~ ~ ~
i i g
- - ~
~ ~ ~
8'8'~
!
~
..
~
~
s
~
-
! L
i 19
.
I.. :ti
"I @~!
t u
11 ~ ~~ ~
j J~ ~ H i
.. . i2 I
k L I ~.
i i~ ! ,I~ !
;:I;
.."
c
~
~ i
:Ii !
iii :I
i i
~
Ii
0:
~
-
g
~ ~
~
~
i :
- -
I
1
~
i
'>-
.
m
Ii
I
~
I
u
Ii
I
Ii ~
2 ~
~ I
_ u
Ii
I
~
~
I
u
Ii Ii
i i
>< ><
~ ~
~ ~
2 2
E E
- -
~ ~
!!
i
i I
~
i
~
.
i
z
2
I
I I
~ 11 11
~ I ~ ~
.
~ 0 $
~
S 11 i i
u ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ 0 ;; ;;
; ~ !I !I
~ i ;; :E
~ ;; Ii
::: ~
~ ;; ~ ~ ~ 8 8
~ ~ ~ i . i ~ ~ ~
I ~ i i
.
S ~ . '& S . S '& S S
u ~ .i u j u .21 .21
1!5 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! k
! ! i ! ! := ! ! ! ! ! !
-
~ ~ :;! i iR I ~ !!! ~ ~ ili !!! ~
~ .. ~ Ii .. ~ ~ .; Ii
I ::: ~ ~ ~ ~
Ii
I:' Ii: Ii: s: Ii s: ~ ~ s: ~ ~ s: ~
.. i ~ ~
~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ I! ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
~ 'C . f '2
~ :: . I !
~ ~ ~ .
t ~ u u
I . , .. .. ~ i
~ 'C~ i ~ .w.
c ~ ~
. .
~ J:: 1 :;; :;; ~ ~ ~
18. ~ . - ~ . i i ~ ~
~~ ~ J . $ ~ ! ~
f'C i "i . . u .
~i ~ i ! i .
. I I ~ ~
II" . . ~
I . .
S;~ "i 8 ,!; i f I s s
jl c ~ ~
=~ . i Ii Ii j . ~ ~ 'C 'C
. ;;: ;;: ;;:
w_ ~ . ; Ii . .
u i i
;;1!5 If j j j u
Iii; L - ~ ~ fi ~ i i
~~ - . .. U !! .
. . So
. . . ~~ . . "i !
~;f . 'C 'C ~ 'C ~ ! i
Ii ~! Ii i .
~ d ~ 8 u 8 H Ii
~ :c ~ ;; E ;; J
H ~t -JI ~ . ~ i i
!~ . I ! t.
~ Ii I~ f f f
! ~ I f << I ~
w
~ . t I ~ I ~
oS ~~ ji u- ~
;;-li !! !! !! ~
~ H '2 . -= Ei
~ t~ . . ~ . :! I !,
u . ;~ -I ~ ~ ~
" -Ii ~ ~
~ . ~ :! -Ii -Ii
oS -li~ ~ ~ .w.::: i:::
H H I! . . i . I I I
~ ;; ;; ;; l~ l~
.:2 111 ~ 111
Ii
Ii I ~
~ ~ ,
! !it !it ~ Iii Iii i
II II II ~ II .. .. i i
!! .. .. i ! ! I ! i
I! I I i i ~ ~
.. It
~ I w ~ ~
I
.. ..
.. i i
~ c i i
~ ~ I() !O! .. !!
~
i 8 i5 II ! II ~ ~ I if if
I ~ ~ I ~ I ! ~ i ; ,; ,;
~ f Iii Iii
I t= ii ~
! ~ .. ~ ~ e i 8
i! ~ .. .. w
I I .; .; -
.. .. i! I I:!
~ << << E .. ,;
N
-
~
,~3L3~ 0 ~
~
&
.
~
~
i
;
! 2
~ =
Ii ii ii ~ 'i
~ i i ! }
~ I I I k
! ! i ! ~
~ i !Ji Ii !Ii
I ~ ;: ~ :;i
II!
I" III II! Iii
~ ~ ! ~ i
:::
~
~
~
~
~
~
-
o
.
:: :: :: ';
~ ~ ~ =:
~ Z z e.
... '" ... ...
:;;; ;; ~ g'
., eI ... -
~ & & 1':
11'I 1/1 '" r
I I ~ ~
! ~ ! ..
~ ~ ~ ~
! II ! .
c ~ .5 u
'i 'i I ~
tJ ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l! l! l! ;:;
! ~ ~ ~
I!!!hl
iI!~
J,IO:
~o
~~
Ii!
:a
::~
~-
u
;;15
f:i_
;i
0<
i;
!I
u<
,
-
!
!5
I!
u
~
~ -
I ~ ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. ~
Ii! C
2 i I i ~
= a. .. _ u
i
Ii
I! I! I! ;
E 5 5 ..
3 is 5 i
I ~ ~ ~ ;;;
~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
d3/-:V7
j
11
~
.
2
_ F
2..
:q
tJl
i~
H
=-
ooX
i ~
~
=
- ~
. =
. -
1;i~
"':!~
bi-
t -11
!!oX_
j
11
~
.
o
~
2
= ii
i I
k I
= !
~
!
I
!
.
J
k
'"
-
N N
~ ::;
i i
!
r!i
iiJ
~
;:
i
i ;
~
!
~
~
!
~
i
..
F !' ;:;
~ ~ i
i i !
~ L L i
~nn_~
,!; ,iJ:; .iJi t
~ U U i
~ I~ f~ i ~
j ;0: ;-: j i
.. I ...... 11
~ II II ~ ~
;:; t~ f~ ·
;:; !
_F2 _rJ f;J"
~~ ~~ lj I
"
.
ii
i
i
.
j
2
~ ~
- ~ ~
II! II! II!
~ i!J i!J
c: tf ~
6 ~ &!
~
r
~
~
I
u
Ii!
2
II!
i
~
E E
s;; ;;
8 ~ SJ
~ ~
I I I
a.: i i
II
~ ~ ~
-ZtJ-: .?
~
Ii!
i
E
lIS
~
~
;;;
!!(
I
~
.
- .
~~
-d
u
~!
- r
!i .
~ ;
..'"
;: t
J.
~ .
~::;
. .
.
p~...
tiP
I~k
fl~
~ u ~
:!;
N
!
II!
!
I
'I;
.
;;
~
g
u
!
=
~
!
i
f
.
g
:c
t
; !!
- Ii
fu
~
o .
- ~
Iii
.
i
~
-
;;
.
- .
~:::
~ I
.ot
u
~!
- F
! f
. .
. .
..'"
- ~
} ~
~ .
~ -
- ~
. .
~b
,,= ...
. . J
Uk
I~i
no
~ u ~
:;!
.
.;
m
Iii
~
I
'I;
.
;;
~
g
u
!
=
~
&
.
~
f
.
'i
~
:c
t
;!!
- Ii
fu
~
o .
- ~
!;\
.
.
i
~
~
;;
" " '& ! io ! Ii
t t I .!i R .!i ;;
.
f .. .. ,.; ,.; ::i t
~ ~ ~ ~
- - "! - - -
! I' 0 I' I' I' i
~ ! ~ ~ ~
i L ~~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~::: . ~ !! ~ ~ ~ 'I
c_
I .;;i, j~ ~ i i i ~o
It_ S . ~
! 1'1 1'1 u I' I' I' ~-
~ ": f ~ g ~ ~ ~ Hi
t. .d ! ~ ~ .: ~ ~ ~ I
~
I ..J! ..J! .I i ! ! .~
!.. !!.. !J i ti c .
ra ra u ;; - - ~ 0
I!s 0_
Ii ! ! r~ r~ r~ . -
! :; I ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-
! - - - - ~
~~ ! ~ I' ~r J!!r ~~
.to: .t~ .t~ .t~
~ N N Ii ~ ;:: Si I Ii! E
~ III
0 c
..: ~ ~ If ! s ~ i ~
I :;: 0
Ii!
~ iii Ii: :i1 Ii: ;;; ; Ii: ;;; ;;;
;/ , ~ ~ , ~ , ,
!!! JI I! ~ ~ !
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. Ii .t Ii It.
0
;;; '5i '&.51. '6ii I
~ ~ I i i g . g -
0 j ~ -.I -.I~ J.i.c
:: u u I ! I il! il~
i- i- u ~ '6
III~ i 0 - ~ii
Jog ~ t t -
!:" ;! ;! ~ ~ . ~ Ii .p :;
~.a. 5.:1 0. C 0. ~
~I '6 ~ uu ~(,.I....
. HI HI
I ! Ii Ii ql ~
:::c i i J
~
~- u _ u _ I'_ i
;:15 ..I' ..I' - .
;i ~i I~"! I!!I I~I ..
~ ~ i
1>1; p 1-1;
~~ !! !! r j ; I'! I' I'! I' I~
u Ii u Ii
Ii ~ ~~ ~~ ~ A- ~ A_ ~ A- - ~
~I 0 I' H H .),! r'il .),! r'il .),! r'il
~I ~I t _ ~ .t - ?s- t_&. - ~
i ~ ~ ~ ~ q! q! ~ ~ IS !o.
- ,d
~ j:i jj i ~ Ii ~!- n
~ u ~ u 1-- 1-- 1--
h ~ - ~ - ~ - u ~
~ f ~"! . . .
~ . . s~j s~j sli -.w,
!I '6~ '6~ =' 0 ~ 0
~ Ii~ d ~ :c It
- ~ ~.; ~i ;p ;p ; I ~
u ! ~I ~I ~ ~ I ~!
.. t_ t_
tJ tJ ~- ~-
~ i EJ EJ i e H
u Le Le
; II II i
Ii ~ I I I
~ , - -
~ ~
! II II i II II
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
II ; i i
if! ! ii ! ! !
c ~ u
IQ IQ
- -
tj ! I II
;: Ii Ii ~
~ i I!! ; ; -
~ !
~
I - ~ ;: ;
I I I!! ,
c m .; ~ i
S m ~ ~ ~
~ I:! - ::;
~
E E I I - - -
N !It !It ; ; ; ;
-
~ oZ3L3,r!~
CHRONOLOGY OF CHULA VISTA AMERICAN LEGION POST 434 VETERANS HALL
October 23. 1931 - Chula Vista American Legion Post 434 chartered
March 12. 1941 City
acres in Eucalyptus
approves building of
Approves
Park to
Memorial
resolution #594 to
the Legion for
Hall.
lease of 1.6
20 years. and
(circa 1947) Legion develops land for Baseball Fields and
conducts American Legion Baseball Program.
(circa 19S0) Legion Grants title to Veterans Memorial Hall to
City. at City request. ($1.)
(circa 1952) Legion Baseball Field site returned back to City
at City request.
February 1. 1955 - City renews Legion Lease for 20 years.
(resolution 1702) with ball fields removed from leased land.
(circa 1974)
lot cost
City assesses Legion for 1/2 of paving parking
$12,000.00)
July 1. 1975 City renews Legion Lease for 10 years. (descent
Councilman Scott) resolution 7803
(circa July 1982) - Federal Block Grant money available. Parks and
Rec plan to expand facilities in Park.
(circa April 1983) - City hires Engineer to condemn Legion Memorial
Hall as not up to 'existing" earth quake standards. and
proposes additional parking in lieu of Legion Hall. (other
minor building repairs noted and repaired by legion)
July 21, 1983 Legion proposes structural plan as terms for
extension. Council denied extension of lease on recommendation
of Parks of Recreation commission, and requests staff study
alternatives.
Aug/Sept 19B3 - Legion meets with staff (Asst City Mgr Asmus and
Beyers) who identifies staff requirements as:
A. $1,000,000.00 liability insurance, with city as co-insured.
B. Structural, Financial and Aesthetic architect plan for city
Sept 1983 Legion hires engineer to develop structural
improvement plan ($8,000.00) with fix estimated at $200,000.00.
October 1983 Legion requests lease extension with city in
compliance with requirements of above. City. upon
recommendation of the Parks and Recreation commission deny
lease extension past original date of 6/30/85, and referred to
staff. Parks and Rec recommended Legion locate on City land
behind KOA.
,2Sa. ./
November 27, 1984 City establishes Legion relocation committee
(Mayor Cox and Councilman Moore) to work with American Legion
towards: (1) Relocation, (2) Ownership by Legion.
Mar 1985 - June 1989 Committee Meetings with American Legion
determines positions that:
(1) City does not want to 'Own or lease American Legion Hall"
because of liability.
(2) City wants "separation of Legion activities" from City
activities, and recommends to Legion to relocate to lower
Eucalyptus Park, in exchange for providing second story
Community Activities Center for City use, with title ownership
transferred to Legion upon City loan guarantee repayment.
November II, 1990 City Council (item 15) approved report:
"Requesting Authority to negotiate an agreement with the
American Legion for Relocation, Demolition and Replacement of
their Facility with Joint Use Provision."
March 1991 Legion hires architect
based on over all 14,000 Sq
bridge, and joint use. (Legion
to develop two story building
Ft requirement, (7000x2) land
plan cost $20,000.00)
May 28, 1991 - After meeting with Legion, Architect meets with Parks
and Rec (P&R) Commission for Legion Hall/Rec Center concept
approval. Non-committal response received from commission,
stating beverage sale not compatible in park, and main meeting
room size to small.
June 4, 1991 - As result of P&R up-scoping project Legion meets with
Mayor (acting) Moore, City Mgr. Gene Asmus to review Legion
plan, including original architect plan. City Mgr states to
Legion, that although Legion acted on his (City Mgr) reliance,
we should not have hired architect until after "Staff" submits
terms of business plan to Parks and Rec. Realizing financial
limitations of Legion Mr. Moore states that what Legion can
afford is what Parks and Rec gets, giving example of South City
Library requirements vs available funds. 14,000 Sq ft plan
approved by Commission member and requested Legion submittal to
P&R.
June 22, 1991 - Larger plan (outside financial scope of Legion)
brought to Parks and Rec who failed to even look at new plan
during commission meeting. (eat-up with Boys and Girls club
wanting to manage new youth center).
July 19, 1991 - Numerous Legion attempts to contact P&R Director to
no avail
August 22, 1991 - City Atty refers Legion to Parks and Rec, for
resolution of "business plan" as approved in 11/90.
September 12, 1991 Legion finally meets with Parks and Rec
director who states that:
~~-~
(1) They want nothing to do with the legion hall vis-a-vis
scheduling or utilization in view of beverages sold by legion,
and will not act on approved city council "business plan. "
(2) Up to American Legion to get city Approval of business plan
outside of Parks and Recreation.
October 10, 1991 - Legion representative talks to Mayor
Attorney regarding new city position taken by Parks
requests update (now what) with city council.
subject on council agenda for October 22, 1991.
and City
and Tec and
Mayor puts
10/15/91
Xc: City Clerk
City Attorney
City Manager
.J. 5'ea.. - .3
AMERICAN LEGION/CITY
INTERACTION
CHRONOLOGY
from City records (prepared by Parks & Recreation Department staff)
Date
1/15/41
3/12/41
2/1/55
7/1/75
2/13/79
6/7/83
[amerlegn]
Issue
city approves a lease to
American Legion for a
building site
city executes 20-year
lease of 1.60 acres for
Legion's use. Reso. 594.
Lease is for the current
location of the American
Legion Hall.
city executed a 20-year
lease of real property,
including buildings and
improvements. Reso. 1702
As a compromise between
the Legion I s request for
a 20-year lease extension
and staff's
recommendation to
terminate the lease, the
Legion lease was extended
10 years; Reso. 7803.
council denies a request
by Legion to extend the
lease an additional 10
years, to 1995.
City Building and Housing
finds 19 code violations
in Legion building
(earthquake concerns).
outcome
city conditioned building be constructed
sometime during 1941
No copy of lease on file
The American Legion gave the building to
the City to avoid paying property taxes and
leased it back for $1 per year.
Lease contained no options for extension.
Parks and Recreation Commission recommended
against the lease renewal.
1
1.5tA - I a...
7/21/83
&
10/20/83
11/27/84
5/7/85
Parks & Recreation
commission reaffirmed
recommendation that
American Legion lease not
be extended past 6/30/85.
Council directed staff to
work with Legion to
negotiate a program that
would address the
following concerns:
1. Plan for updating
building
2. Landscaping plan
3. Financial plan and
time schedule
Legion again requests the
City consider:
1. 20-year lease of the
land to American Legion
2 . Revert building to
American Legion
3. City sell
building sits on
than lease
land
rather
10/23/85 American Legion requests
ci ty return ownership of
building to them and
offered to buy the land
at fair market value.
Legion estimated value of
land as about $50,000
4/26/86 Am e r i can Leg ion
reiterated their proposal
of 10/23/85, but reduced
price of land to $25,000
6/17/86
[amerlegn]
Council changes Legion's
lease to a month-to-month
agreement.
All due not later than 5/30/85
Legion did not meet this schedule, but did
develop plans which appear to satisfy the
earthquake concerns.
Council directed staff to bring back with
previously requested report from American
Legion
Council appointed a two-member subcommittee
to assist in resolving the Legion's lease
problems.
2
2'A-2D...
3/6/87
4/29/87
5/1/87
10/9/87
11/13/87
[amer l egn]
Letter
Council
Cox and
from Legion
subcommittee
Moore
to
of
Legion has received draft lease agreement
in mid-January 1987.
Legion is considering leveling present
building and constructing a new building.
Legion suggests a Co-Venture with the City
as a MUlti-Purpose Facility under Legion
management. Wants 30-year lease in new
building. city will use part of facility
as a public portion.
Legion states they have expended $10,000
for seismic plans.
Legion will apply for a CDBG grant for
funding.
Legion meets with City
Legion corresponds
City with results
4/29/87 meeting.
City and Legion meet
City and Legion meet
No records in file.
to Legion requests a new building to be
of constructed and will share with community
non-profit users.
Memo to Council subcommittee dated 10/15/87
outlines direction items, conditions of
proposed agreement, unanswered questions,
unfinished business, and etc.
During meeting held since 10/9/87 and
11/13/87, it was decided:
Legion and City should not mix uses.
New American Legion site proposed at the
corner of Fifth & C.
11/13/87 meeting discussed:
City Attorney's Office gives legal opinion
on leasing city land to veteran's
organizations.
Legion wants to know if City can convey
land directly to Legion.
Liquor liability discussed.
Mayor Cox suggests everyone step back and
wait for Eucalyptus Park Master Plan.
Legion to look into financing.
3
~5A - 5~
2/27/90
4/9/91
5/31/91
6/4/91
6/20/91
7/19/91
9/10/91
9/19/91
[amer l egn)
Council approves Reso.
15353 for lease agreement
for two-years
city, Legion and their
consultant meet
City, Legion and their
consultant meet in a
special workshop with the
Parks & Recreation
Commission.
Legion, city meet
P&R commission mtg.
Telephone
Legion
calls
from City phone records do not indicate Legion
left messages for staff to return calls
Unscheduled
Legion (no
9/12/91)
meeting with
meeting on
P&R Commission mtg.
Discussion of required approvals and
reviews for project; waiver of fees; ErR;
site dev. costs.
P&R role is limited to review of project
documents.
P&R provides sketches of proposed building.
Legion to provide letter requesting waiver,
extension of time under existing agreement
and review building with P&R.
Discuss size of meeting room for city
needs; types of city programming; parking.
P&R Commission votes 2-3 (failed) to deed
1.6 acres to Legion.
City Attorney is to draft an agreement re:
business terms.
Legion advised agreement
before proceeding with
building plans.
must be signed
development of
commission votes 6-0 (1 absent) to urge
staff to work with City Attorney and Legion
to resolve issues and come up with long-
range plan.
Legion comes by and asks status. P&R sets
up a meeting with Legion on 9/19. P&R
advises business terms agreement must be
completed first.
Commission votes 5-1 (& 2 abstentions) to
oppose removal of 1.6 acres from park.
Commission votes 5-0 (& 1 abstention) to
advise Council that P&R should not provide
programming at Legion site because of
alcohol consumption at Legion.
4
~5A. ~'a...
October 16, 1991
, ,. '.'V-)
, l'!,
-------- - .-,
MEMORANDUM TO:
The Honorable Mayor & City ~n.~
Patty Wesp, Council secretar;ro
20TH ANNIVERSARY - IRAPUATO, MEXICO
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The International Friendship Commission has informed our office that a 12-member
delegation from Irapuato, Mexico will be visiting Chula Vista October 24th through
October 27th, 1991 to celebrate the twentieth anniversary of the Sister City affiliation.
In meeting with representatives of the IFC recently, I was informed of a tentative schedule
as follows:
Thursdav - October 24. 1991 - The delegation is expected to arrive at 12:00 noon at
Tijuana Airport. They will be met and escorted to their hotel in Chula Vista by members
of the IFC.
The Subcommittee is recommending that a light lunch be provided at the hotel by
Abigail's Pantry at a cost of $6.50 per person ($78.00).
3:00 p.m. - The delegation will visit City Hall with Mayor Nader and Commissioners where
they will view an exhibit of "Images of Guanajuato" in the Council Chambers. The exhibit
is on loan to us from San Diego-Leon Sister Cities Society.
6:30 p.m. - The delegation will join the United Nations Day Committee for dinner at
LaBella Pizza Gardens.
Fridav - October 25.1991 - The delegation would arrive at the Public Services Building
at 8:30 a.m. for a tour of the City including EastLake, Olympic Training Center site,
Southwestern Community College and the Nature Center. The Subcommittee suggests
providing juice, coffee/tea and sweet rolls. The cost will be $3.50 per person ($42.00).
12:00 noon - The Lions Club will host a luncheon.
6:30 p.m'/7:30 p.m. - A formal dinner is planned at the San Diego Country Club, 88 "L"
Street for the 12-member delegation, City Council, alllFC Commissioners and members
of the Sister Cities Association and host families (total approximately 50 guests). I have
selected a sit-down dinner of Prime Rib at a cost of $20.83 per person (including tax, tip
etc.) ($1,041.50).
c25b
Saturday - October 26. 1991 - The Commission recommends that the delegation be
given the day to shop or visit other areas of interest.
Originally, the IFC recommended having a Western BBQ similar to the one which took
place last year at the Otay Ranch; however, after reviewing the amount of funding, time,
preparation and coordination necessary to conduct a successful event (*refer to
attachment "A"). the Subcommittee requested an alternative recommendation of a
moonlight dinner cruise on board ''The Spirit of San Diego".
Vice Chairman Baker was quoted a price of $44.00 per person (including tax & tip) for
a total of 50 guests ($2,200) which includes a private dining area, a complete dinner of
chicken and beef, Caesar Salad, dessert, two bands, and all beverages.
In addition, it is appropriate that the City present a gift to the citizens of Irapuato and
individual gifts to the Mayor and his wife. City keys/pins currently in stock can be used
for individual gifts to the other members of the delegation. It is estimated that additional
funds will be needed in the amount of $400.00.
In summary, the Subcommittee is requesting that a total amount of $3,761.50 be
appropriated as follows:
$78.00
42.00
1,041.50
2,200.00
400.00
Lunch on October 24, 1991
Coffee & Rolls on October 25, 1991
Dii'mer SDCC October 25, 1991
"Spirit of San Diego Dinner Cruise"
Gifts
TOTAL
$3,761.50
pw
Irapuato
Encls.
cc: City Manager
IFC
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Fri...
::;,- '. J !' 12 D
"'-, () ..
CITy . /:]C,O
.....~f:!I...,G'- L v
. ~ I!',)J.>/,,'vl.-,
rP:l~I~;;;'!.<.j
......
DATE:
September 27, 1990
TO:
Gina Chammas, Assistant Director of Finance
Carole French, Accountant
Accounts Payable Staff
Lyman ChristoPh~irector of Finance
FROM:
SUBJECT:
AUTHORIZATION TO EXPEND $6,157 FROM COUNCIL
CONTINGENCY ACCOUNT FOR JAPANESE VISITORS
At its meeting of September 25, 1990, the City Council authorized expenditures up to
$6,157 for visitors from ChuIa Vista's sister city in Japan.
Attached is a detail list of estimated costs associated with the visit. Please process
payments against account 100-0730-5399 that are related to this program.
LC/eb
Attachment
cc: Nancy Woods
~ 10/{'/9/ 1p6.a./ t~clrhf56 an?,,~
-to (p~ 737. /?
-;s {VI /l-AleSE" VI S I T[)/i. S t>< ffNSES
ESTIMATED COSTS
GIFTS
10 FELT WESTERN HATS
@
@
$20.00 EACH
40 STRAW WESTERN HATS
$12.00 EACH
80 CUSTOM ROSETTES W/RIBBONS
*GIFTS FOR FORMAL PRESENTATION TO MARK THE 10 YR
ANNIVERSARY NOT YET DETERMINED
WESTERN BBO
BBQ BUFFET STYLE MEAL 150 X $9.75
ONE KEG BEER (SET-UP & DELIVERY)
SERVES 150 12 oz. CUPS
WINE & SODAS
ENTERTAINMENT KSON FLATBED BAND
ONE DECORATED CAKE
MISCELLANEOUS DECORATIONS
FORMAL BUFFET DINNER - CHULA VISTA YACHT CLUB
RENTAL FEE FOR THE CLUB
CLEANING FEE
ABC FEE
80 GUESTS @ $18.40 PER PERSON ABIGAIL'S PANTRY
$200.00
480.00
343.00
1,462.50
70.00
100.00
500.00
100.00
150.00
150.00
25.00
10.00
1,472.00
*INCLUDES TAX, TIPS, COMPLETE DINNER OF STEAK, STUFFED
SHRIMP, CAESAR SALAD, ROLLS, PETITE FOURS,
COFFEE & SOFT DRINKS ALL TABLE LINENS & STEMWARE
q /u,/yQ
$1,023
$2,382
$1,657
ITALIAN BUFFET DINNER
RENTAL FEE TO USE CV WOMENS CLUB FACILITY
75.00
960.00
THE POOR GOURMET 80 X $12.00
(*THIS FIGURE INCLUDES RENTAL OF
LINENS, STEMWARE & FLATWARE)
60.00
-
PLUS STAFF COSTS OF POOR GOURMET
TOTAL $6,157
if priJ
,}?
8;/'
-
,
- -
GlJ~GlJ[[) COf~~Cilman Jerry R. Rindone
To <E~ Dot.IO-J.<>-'f/
MQ r L ~J
4f(ri
,
J4g/i-P
I
"'" ""';(t..
""., ,
C:I ,
0'\ " .1
Ld ~:::
~
~' <"'I
~""..,
l, .1 N ,,',
<- ~
bJ
(I:: >->-.
- ,-~
P' 23<:3
;i~~
/
Oct.22 '91 11:29
SIERRA CLUB - SAN DIEGO
FAX 619-299-1742
P. 2
SIERRA CUIII. SA" nn:.:;o CHAPTER
San Diego and Imperial ("oHmic,
Jt(20 Ri1)' S'rL"f:1
Son !)ic~". l A 92104
october 22, 1991
Hayor Tim Nader and City Councilmembers
city o~ Chula Vista
276 4th Avenue
Chula vista, California 91910
RE: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SITE SELECTION
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
The City of Chula Vista, a few weeks agor vo~ed to support
a resolution to conceptually endorse the Otay Lake/Wueste
Road site within Otay Ranch as a new univeisi~y of
California Campus, subject to appropriate environmental
and land use review. The Sierra CJub requests that vou
r@consider your ~upport for this re~olution.
The Sierra Club believes that an expression of support for
the specific site, otay Lake/Wueste Road site, is
premature. We believe that even an expression of
"conceptual support" is premature and can lead to problems
further along in the siting process.
The particular site under consideration is known to be one
of the most sensitive sites on the ranch. It is within
the focused planning area for the otay Regional Park and
is designated open space. It Is vegetated with coastal
sage scrub and is the habitat of the California
qnatcatcher, a candidate for the federal Endangered
Species List.
We were told that because of the site's known sensitivity,
an issue paper evaluating the situation an4 options would
be presented to the Otay Ranch Inter-jurisdictional Task
Force. The issue paper has not yet been presented. Nor
was a staff report evaluating the proposal and
alternatives available to you or the public prior to your
consideration of the resolution. without an issue paper or
staff report, neither we nor you have adeQuate information
on which to base a site selection 4ecision. Furthermore,
there has been no disclosure of a need or reason for
conceptual support by the City of Chula Vista for this
particular aite at this early date.
We believe that your support of this resolution
inappropriately misdirects the focus of planning for the
/
C
~ ;' ~v'/~
C'2-L--?-1.--C--<...--- _y4. ~ ~
Dct.22 '91 11:31a
SIERRR CLUB - SRN DIEGO
FRX 619-299-1742
P. 3
.. '. ..
univer~ity onto this sensitive site without adequate
consideration of other options. Other options do exist
and should be evaluated prior to your taking any position.
While it may be appropriate to conceptually support the
siting of a University of California campus somewhere on
the Otay Ranch, it is very inappropriate, at this point in
time, to support anyone particular, and especially this
particular, site. We urge you to reconsider the
resolution.
:;::;4MJ
Linda Michael, Chair
Land Use Committee
223-9405
..
~~~
=~-~
~~~-::..
~""'-:...--
--~~-
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
October 15, 1991
COUNCIL INFORMATION ITEM
COUNCIL REFERRAL NO. 2426
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City
John D. Goss, City Manager
Diana Levin, Risk Manager
Council
FROM:
Ruth Fritsch, Assistant city
SUBJECT:
Sidewalk Maintenance Ordinance
Several weeks ago we brought to Council's attention a recent case
which we felt revealed a shortcoming in our sidewalk maintenance
ordinance. Briefly, the case (Williams v. Foster (1989) 216
Cal.App.3d 510, 265 Cal.Rptr. 15) said that when a pedestrian is
injured on a sidewalk, the abutting owner is only responsible for
the injury if the City's statute expressly makes him so. It is the
understanding of this office that Council did not want to shift
liability for all types of sidewalk problems on to the abutting
homeowner, but only those problems which are reasonably within the
control of the homeowner. Pursuant to our current law, Chula vista
Municipal Code section 12.12.070, attached, the property owner must
maintain the sidewalk, curb and gutter free of dirt, rocks and
debris, but is not required to repair damage caused by City tree
roots. While our ordinance does require the homeowner to clean up
the debris, it does not make him liable to a third party if his
failure to do so causes injury.
We considered redrafting our ordinance to make the homeowner liable
to a third party only in the situation where his failure to clean
up loose debris results in injury. However, after consulting with
the Risk Analyst, and PUblic Works Department, it is our feeling
that Council's objective would not be furthered by any amendment at
this time. The vast majority of our trip and fall cases involve
tree roots. Thus, while we could amend our ordinance so that the
homeowner would be liable to a third party if he or she tripped
over loose debris, it is our feeling that it is unnecessary to do
so. As to trip and fall cases involving tree roots, it is our
understanding that Council's desire is to spread the cost of such
injuries among the taxpayers as a group rather than impose the cost
on the individual citizen who owns the property abutting the tree.
For the above reasons, we are withdrawing our initial request for
an amendment, since the current statute appears to best serve
Council's desire in this regard.
RMF:clb
(sidewalk)
''" CO""" ^::::,~~~, ro,'oo~
~~(~
~:-:
~~..-....:~
~~~~
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
TIM NADER
CI1Y OF
CHULA VISTA
October 8, 1991
Mr. Irwin Rubenstein
Coordinator, United States - Mexico Border Affairs
ARA/MEX, Room 4258, U. S. Department of State
Washington, D. C. 20520
RE: Meeting of Binational Committee on Bridges and Border Crossings
Dear Mr. Rubenstein:
f
This is a follow up to a meeting that a delegation of San Diego County officials
had with you on September II, 1991 concerning a proposed binational airport on
Otay Mesa in the City of Sa~ Diego. We understand that there is an upcoming
meeting scheduled of the Binational Committee on Bridges and Border Crossings.
The meeting has tentatively been set for November 12 and November 13, 1991 in
Tamaulipas, Ciudad Victoria, Mexico.
Representatives of our local delegation would very much appreciate the
opportunity of attending that meeting and addressing the Committee under "open
session" on November 12, 1991. We would like to address the Committee as to our
concerns and viewpoints regarding the binational proposal. We understand that
this is not an item included on your normal agenda. We are also aware that you
have a heavy work schedule and thus we are prepared to make our comments succinct
and to comply with whatever time guidelines you should impose. We do, however,
feel it is appropriate and relevant to bring this matter to the attention of your
committee.
We would appreciate it if you could note our interest, reserve a spot on your
agenda and keep us informed regarding the meeting arrangements. You may contact
my office directly or, in the alternative, contact Mr. George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager, City of Chula Vista, at (619) 691-5031, as further information is
forthcoming. In addition, we would note for your convenience that our fax number
is (619) 691-5171. Thank you for your attention and consideration.
~ely, /I
~ /t,~
Tim Nader
Mayor
TN:GK:ame
cc: George Krempl, Deputy City Manager
~' ';;;' /~~
~<--rt.A::--<--(/~:>7vt/
276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5044
RECEiVED
f~ . i? ;~.' j--;: -"r~~-'- ~ ~:: ';
, ~ L.. c, U '.' 's '"
I , ~..~_. ._.'".~_-----c. I '
. . dii:'
. . ,f
.. ' OCT I 5 1991 i i U i
", \1..)1
L. . ~-,-_.._--1 I
Cli', l:vJ,,~'!: C:H iCES I
Cl-'~ i.:" "i:';' Ch
"91 OCT 15 P2 :28
October 14, 1991
File # EY-295
CITY r.= ,",1. 'L.'-:-'.
,. ,P ,,_ ~ -, f L" I-"
CITv (, C'= "..",
! \JL... ~ - ,.
SUBJECT:
Honorable Mayor and City co~ncil ~
John D. Goss, City Manager~ ~ JI
Acceptance of Public Im~ovements, East1ake Greens,
Phase IA
TO:
FROM:
This is to inform you that in accordance with City Council
Resolution No. 16034 adopted on January 22, 1991 this office has
acknowledged acceptance of public improvements (Eastlake Parkway)
built in conjunction with the Eastlake Greens, Phase IA
development.
This unit is generally located South of Otay Lakes Road and West of
Eastlake Parkway (see locator map). The improvement agreement for
this unit was approved by Council Resolution No. 15475 on January
23, 1990.
Acceptance of the Eastlake Parkway improvements will permit staff
to reimburse the developer the construction costs of these
improvements. This will be in accordance with Assessment District
AD 90-3 and Council Resolution No. 16367 (adopted on October 8,
1991) which allows the payment from bond proceeds as each project
in the district is completed.
RS:cf/kw
(RS4\ACCEPT4.MEM)
COU'\!.tIL SNFORA~A rSON
"
I ,
, .
, ,
III
I-
w
w
I
III
on
IL
D
('f')
I
00
00<
.-
O~
Z~
-~=
~I:I.~
~U2~
~ ~~~
_E-t=~
,:; ~,,~
E-4~~
~1:Id
:~"><
~p ~
<:U2
~~
'pt ~
~t=
;0
~.
:t
:.1
r:
':1
:(
..'- --
~
g~~'
...~;;.
- i
. ,
<c.
;::;~
~:
.
..
r
. '
~ ~;;
- '!~
- I ~~
.~
, .'
.t
~~
L
""
-.
~"
..
"
~~
.-
"
"
Ii
-.?-.
,r
I
t. ,
, \\
\
- ,"lIC _
-- -(,::,~~'~ .,
.
";
'"
b:
-'
u.
l~ ~
"
_, (,r:
,~
~ ~: c:::
",..",
,,",'10
.It"';
t
/,'
If-:
II ;1 .b
. '
.
--4-,
"
h'
.
c:
D
~
-
,
'"
"
z
,.
c.
.'
- ~~
~
I f"
, I~~
,'I' h~
...
:,;::i
~:t~
. --~
I QQ...
i.......;, --~ ;/- --.
II..t1UNM^ ~ ~,
~
I~!
.
~.
hi l~
/') ;'
..
", '"
" ..
,~ -.
...~ -
~
'.
~~
o
~<
Q.
"'i!'
,. ,/
."
l',
6-~:~
,~
~
,
r,'
Ii
'.
,.
"
,
,.. \I') &
~ ~:e
o g ~~ _
.; ~
u ~
j ,
..
N
,;.
~
z
~
..
m
d
Z
o '
ff ~
-
i!
,~
~~
"
"
!:;
~E
~
~IH!
II;i:
O'11il
u 'I~
.II.!I~
I,U
D 111
..filii
~{~
~
~~;t~
- - --
CIlY OF
CHUlA VISTA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
October 14, 1991
File No. AY-083
I, William T. Ostrem, received Check No. 162962 issued by the City of Chula Vista in the
amount of $4,194,522.06 from William Ullrich on this date, October 14,1991.
This check is the first payment for work completed under Assessment District 90-3,
Eastlake Greens.
WAU:cf
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5021
254 Camino Elevado
Bonita, CA 91902
October 19, 1991
Mayor and City Council
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
The subject of this letter is the university site on the Otay Ranch. You recentl y took an
action designating a specific area on the Ranch as the desired university site. We believe
your action was peremptory. It was not in the best interests of Chula Vista, nor did it
increase the chances of obtaining a 4-year university.
The purpose of this letter is to request that you formally reconsider that action at your next
meeting.
We request that at the meeting you take one of the following actions: that you rescind your
previous resolution and table any further action by you on this item until the issue of the
university site has completed the designated Inter-jurisdictional Task Force process - or
that you resolve simply that the university site should be located somewhere within the
boundaries of the 23,000 acre Otay Ranch. The exact site to be determined after a complete
and appropriate process is followed.
We make this request for the following reasons:
1. A process has been established to ensure the orderly and appropriate consideration
of the many difficult issues regarding the planning for Otay Ranch. This process
assures staff input and accommodates public input, it assures that all relevant
information can be made available, and that decisions are made in the public arena.
It was established jointly by you and by the County to make sure things were done
right. Your action ignores this process, and contributes to things being done
wrong.
2. There is no hurry. There is nothing, absolutely nothing, to indicate that the process
should be abrogated. There is no public evidence that action now makes any
difference to the University of California. In fact, evidence to the contrary has been
presented in the San Diego Tribune. They report that the University has indicated
their siting decision is at least two years down the road and that a specific location is
not needed now.
3. The designated site is considered by many to be the most environmentally sensitive
area on the Otay Ranch property. It is also smack-dab in the middle of the Council
adopted Green-belt adjacent to and through the City. The site designated is very
controversial.
a~~~~~
We are not against a university site. In fact, the opposite is true. We believe the economic'
and cultural benefits to the citizens of Chula Vista and the surrounding area would be
substantial if a 4-year university, especially a UC campus, were to be located here. We do
not know whether the site you have designated is a satisfactory location.
Furthermore, the City has a better chance of obtaining a university if the entire community
supports the site. A controversial site is not helpful to realizing this goal. The best way to
oot get community support is to ramrod a decision on the community with input only from
the developer. The best way to get community support is through an open, deliberate,
process; one that places all the information on the table, that encourages public input, and in
which public decisions are made in the public arena. That process exists. We are asking
simply that you use it.
Sincerely,
;,'UU'(, ,LL ~ /
,
William 1. Robens J
President, CROSSROADS
;//
I> I'-ll L"~
'::--'" . .'
\
\
\
-
----
\"
"
~-
~
-----
~M__.
./
., i
fl.
\\'. I' I -------
~~ I ---------- -
r., I
\~I
~~ I
(/
!
I
/
..