Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/11/09 Tuesday, November 9, 1993 6:00 p.m. 1\1 declare under penalty ~f perjury that' I a'" employed by the City of Chu!a Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and t~at I pos 'ed this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at the Public S r ices Buildin~ r~nd at City no;j U.1 DATED, 1/ '1 SiC,,'::: C/~~' Council Chambers (...../" ---Public Services Building Regular Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council CALL TO ORDER 1. ROIl. CALL: Councilmembers Fox _, Horton _, Moore _, Rindone _' and Mayor Nader _ 2. PLEDGE OF AIJ.EGIANCE TO 11IE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 26, 1993. 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF 11IE DAY: a. Certificates of Appreciation to be presented to three teachers from Odawara, Japan - Mayor Nader will present the Certificates of Appreciation in recognition of civic and meritorious service rendered in the public interest to Yoshihisa Oishi, Masato Nakayama, and Minoru Yamaguchi. b. The California Healthy Cities Projects' Special Achievement Commemorative Award will be presented for CHULA VISTA'S PROJECT CARE - Gregory Schaffer, Local Program Development Specialist with the California State Department of Health Services, will present the 1993 California Healthy Cities Projects' Special Achievement Commemorative Award for CHULA VISTA'S PROJECT CARE to the Mayor and Council. The senior safety net program was recently selected as one of five award recipients in the State. c. Proclamations commending ChuIa Vista City employees for their commitment in supporting "AIDS Walk San Diego '93" - Mayor Nader will present the proclamations to Berlin Bosworth and Alice Espinoza. CONSENT CALENDAR (llems 5 Ihrough 13) The stilff recoltlJtU!ndations regarding the following items lisled under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion wiLhout discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or CiLy staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please [zIl out a "Request to Speak Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the CiLy Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the rust items of business. 5. WRITfEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter seeking to have the Council ask its San Diego Area Governments (SANDAG) representative to request that a study be done on the feasibility of FLOATPORT as an option for San Diego's new airport. Joseph E. Leary, President, FLOATPORT, 1660 Hotel Circle North, Ste. 723, San Diego, CA 92108. It is recommended that this letter be received and forwarded to the Port District. b. Letter of resignation from the Library Board of Trustees effective December 31, 1993 - Linda C. Wilson, 426 Naples St., Chula Vista, CA 91911. It is recommended that the resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. Agenda 6. 7. 8. 9. ORDINANCE 2575 ORDINANCE 2576 ORDINANCE 2577 ORDINANCE 2578 -2- November 9, 1993 AMENDING SECTION 19.14.050A OF TI-IE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW APPUCANTS FOR PLANNING PERMITS TO BYPASS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HEARING TO EXPEDITE CONSIDERATION BY PLANNING COMMISSION (second readinS[ and adoption) - In February, Council requested staff pursue several permit streamlining actions which had been referred for evaluation. One of the items was to prepare a draft ordinance which would provide an applicant with the option to bypass the Zoning Administrator and take applications directly to the Planning Commission. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning) REPEAIJNG SECTION 2.48.200 OF TI-IE MUNICIPAL CODE TI-IEREBY DISSOLVING TI-IE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE (second feadinS[ and adoption) - On 8/17/93, Council directed staff to proceed with the proposal to dissolve the Montgomery Planning Committee (MPC) and determine an appropriate process to seat the remaining MPC members on the Southwest Project Area Committee (PAC). Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (The Redevelopment Agency has already directed the Southwest PAC to consider remaining MPC member Platt for membership on the PAC.) (Director of Planning and Director of Community Development) AMENDING TI-IE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABUSHED BY SECTION 19.18.010 OF TI-IE MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING TI-IE 5.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT TI-IE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND "J" STREET FROM CoO, OFFICE COMMERCIAL, AND R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, TO C-C-P, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL PRECISE PLAN (second feadinS[ and adoption) - The applicant, American Stores Properties, Inc., parent company of the Lucky Stores, has submitted applications to amend the General Plan and rezone 5.8 acres located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and" J.. Street. The proposal is to redesignate the site from Professional and Administrative Commercial to Retail Commercial, and to rezone the site from COO (Commercial Office) and R-l, (Single Family Residential) to C.C, (Central Commercial) in order to accommodate the relocation of the Lucky Store. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning) CERTIFYING TI-IE FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (FPEIR 90-01) FOR TI-IE OTAY RANCH PROJECT; PREZONING MOST OF TI-IE OTAY RANCH TO TI-IE PC (pLANNED COMMUNITY) ZONE; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO TI-IE CAUFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS (second readinS[ and adoption) - Council and the San Diego County Board of Supervisors held a joint public hearing on 10/28/93 to consider final actions on the Otay Ranch Project, including a General Plan Amendment, General Development Plan, and Pre-zoning. The Ordinance: (a) Approves Pre-zoning of 22,509 acres of the unincorporated Otay Ranch property to the PC (Planned Community) Zone; (b) Certifies the FPEIR (90-01) including the Technical Addendum; and (c) Adopts the CEQA Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Otay Ranch Project. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning) Agenda -3- November 9, 1993 10. RESOLlTI10N 17300 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR (FY) 1993/94 BUDGET TO UPGRADE 1.0 POUCE PEACE OFFICER TO POUCE SERGEANT TO SUPERVISE THE POUCE DEPARTMENTS STREET TEAM AND APPROPRIATING AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS THEREFOR - As part of the FY 1993/94 budget process, the Police Department requested a five member "Street Team" to provide the Chief of Police more flexibility to address the increasing number of robberies. The concept approved during the budget process provided for 5.0 Peace Officer positions to be added to the Police Department's budget of supervisory services to be provided by existing staff in the Crime Suppression Unit. The proposed resolution would add a 1.0 Police Sergeant position to the Police Department Uniform Patrol Division to ensure the Street Team's efforts are more appropriately interpreted with those of on-duty patrol officers. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police) 4/5th's vote required. 11. RESOLlTI10N 17301 BOUNDARY LOT ADJUSTMENT FOR SANIBELLE PARTNERSHIP AND AUTIiORlZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT MAP AND GRANT DEEDS - In the course of construction of the Sanibelle Development along Hidden Vista Drive in the Terra Nova area, the developer expressed concern that the property line was at the bottom of the slope. Staff reviewed the situation and agreed from the Department's perspective, it would be most advantageous to shift the property line to the top of the slope. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation and Director of Public Works) 12. RESOLlTI10N 17302 APPROVING A SEWER CONNECTION AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WIlli FRANCISCO J. MARES AND MAl T. DO, AT 4017 PALM DRIVE AND AUTIiORlZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY - In accordance with Council Policy 570-02, Francisco Javier Mares and Mai Tuyet Do have executed the required agreement in order to connect their property (in the unincorporated area of the County) to City sewer. The agreement is now ready for execution. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 13. RESOLlTI10N 17303 APPROVING AGREEMENT WIlli GCF LAUNDRY OF CHULA VISTA AND COLRlCH INVESTMENTS, LTD. FOR THE DEFERRAL OF PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF APPROPRIATE SEWER CAPACITY FEES - On 4/20/93, Council received a letter from the National Properties Group in which it was requested that they be allowed to pay sewer capacity fees of approximately $60,000 for a proposed laundromat over a period of ten years. Council referred the issue to staff to work with the developer in an effort to allow the project to proceed. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * Agenda .4. November 9, 1993 PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to spei1k to any iton, pkase fiU out the "Request to Speok Form" available in the lobby and submiJ it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommenda1ion; complete the pink form to speak in opposilion to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual 14. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN INfERIM PRE.SR-I25 DEVELOPMENT IMPACf FEE AND CONSIDERATION OF MODIFICATION OF TI-IE EXISTING TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACf FEE . On 8/20/91, Council approved a contract with Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff (HNTB) for professional services in preparing a report which would analyze future transportation needs in Chula Vista and help staff develop contingency plans in the event that SR.125 is not constructed in a timely fashion. HNTB has completed the report which contains a recommended roadway system, and a recommended financing plan. It also provides background and discussion of issues considered in developing the proposal. Staff recommends Council place the ordinances on first reading and approve the resolution. (Director of Public Works) Continued from the meeting of 10/26/93. A. ORDINANCE 2579 ADOPTING AN INfERIM PRE-SR-125 TRANSPORTATION FACIUlY FEE TO BE EFFECTIVE JANUARY 1, 1995 (first readinl!) B. ORDINANCE 2580 AMENDING ORDINANCE 2251 RELATING TO A TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACf FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACIUTIES IN TI-IE CIlY EASTERN TERRITORIES (first readinl!) C. RESOLUTION 17304 ACCEPTING A REPORT PREPARED BY HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN AND BERGENDOFF ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS REGARDING TI-IE FEASIBIUlY OF CONSTRUCTING AN INfERIM FACIUlY TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION CAPACIlY IN CHULA VISTA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SR-125 (lNfERIM PRE-SR-125 FACIUTY) This resolution does not reQuire a public hearinl! but is a related item. 15. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERING FORMATION OF A FEE RECOVERY DISTRICf FOR OTAY VAlLEY ROAD - ASSESSMENT DISTRlCf NUMBER 90-2 . On 9/23/93, Council approved accepting the Engineer's Report declaring the City's intent to form a fee recovery district for Otay Valley Road. Assessment District Number 90.2 and set 11/9/93 as the date for the public hearing. Staff recommends Council continue the public hearing to the meeting of 11/16/93. (Director of Public Works) ORAL COMMUNICATIONS 1his is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an i1em on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohihiJs the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communkations Form" available in the lobby and submiJ it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. Agenda -5- November 9, 1993 BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS 1his is the time the CiLy Council wi/J consider items whU:h have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of the CiLy's Boards, Commissions and/or Commiltees. 16. REPORT A TWO-YEAR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN UPDATE BY 1HE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC) - In August 1991, Council adopted the City's first Economic Development Plan - a blueprint of City-wide goals and objectives related to business development and assistance. The EDC requested staff prepare a two-year update of the status of the goals and objectives, and will be presenting the status report to Council. It is recommended that Council: (1) Review and accept the two-year Economic Development Plan update; and (2) Provide any feedback to the EDC and staff as Council deems appropriate. (Economic Development Commission) ACTION ITEMS T1u! ilems listed in this section of the agenda are erpected to eli1:it substantial discussians and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general public. T1u! ilems wi/J be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please [ill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the CiLy Clerk priar to the meeting. PublU: comments are limited to five minutes. 17. RESOLUTION 17305 AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO REVIEW RATE SETTING PROCESS FOR LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS - During the refuse and recycling rate review hearings for the past two years (Fiscal Year 1991/92 and 1992/93), Council has requested that relevant financial and statistical information be provided regarding Laidlaw Waste System's operations. Staff encountered a significant hurdle to obtaining information which the company deemed proprietary and for which the City was unable to guarantee confidentiality. In order to approach the rate review process with confidence and to obtain relevant financial and statistical information, staff proposes to use an independent firm to assist in selecting relevant financial indicators and establish guidelines as to how these indicators will be used in the rate setting process. Laidlaw has agreed to pay the cost of hiring an outside firm. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Finance) 18. REPORT UPDATE ON SOUD WASTE DISPOSAL ISSUES - An oral report will be given by staff. ITEMS PULLED FROM 1HE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the CiLy Council will discuss ilems whi1:h have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agendn items pulled at the request of the publi1: will be considered priar to those pulled by Councilmembers. Publi1: comments are limiled to five minutes per individual Agenda -6- November 9, 1993 OTI-lER BUSINESS 19. CI1YMANAGER'S REPORTfS) a. Scheduling of meetings 20. MAYOR'S REPORTfS) a. Ratification of appointment: Lee Wheeland - Cultural Arts Commission. b. Industrial Water Policy. 21. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Rindone a. Assembly Bill 1332 . Authorizing cities to adopt an ordinance establishing a five-year pilot program which implements procedures for declaring any motor vehicle a public nuisance when the vehicle is used in the commission of an act of prostitution. ADJOURNMENf The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss: Instructions to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) , Western Council of Engineers (WCE) , Police Officers Association (POA) , International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) , Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Continued from the meeting of 11/Z/93. Pending litigation pursuantto Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. San Diego Palm Plaza Project. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - EPA vs. the City of San Diego, Chula Vista amicus party discussion, instructions to attorneys. The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on November 16, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1/ b Meeting Date 1119/93 ITEM TITLE: Presentation: The California Healthy Cities Projects' Special Achievement Commemorative Award will be presented for CHULA VISTA'S PROJECT CARE SUBMTITED BY: Director of Parks and Recreatio~ Gregory Shaffer, Local Program Development Specialist with the California State Department of Health Services, will present to the Mayor and City Council the 1993 California Healthy Cities Projects' Special Achievement Commemorative Award for CHULA VISTA'S PROJECT CARE. This senior safety net program was recently selected as one of five award recipients in the state. COUNCIL.AGD L}b"'/ p '," -- ,,": ~"\.i'tI~ ~.~~';~;t. :>}.,"~~ *\..t~~, ,r_ ~ "'\;::{'J: < J;;f: j 1:*,'" , .."J "" ~,;1>'>"," ,....J~. ~b.'~~.~ ~-.r '" r'f-:.J~.~ >_~/;!',~ :t::,.. '.".(>'(;"-' ,c;-~:~::L ,: 't~." .:.t./,'i5"::..." <'I ~ :W:'~~)>rk''''-~'';.,Jl.. .1j:.1'.... "",'W-\,;;~",~"""~-_~'P,,J:<,<-'Lh" 1'.." .<')'"q, 1',>,1, J'." ~~, ~ J~~,~~~~t~~~;~~:t~~'~'. ~;"-::-~ ~ , , ~""'~ L." ;,; ;;:'1'" t>."," 'JI"'- , "'t. '~~~"'<r;~.~.,~.,.h'" , ^'-"'"-'''A~~";,.,;;-,,.....~ r" ""':........,;,)~.:,J:"i, ;:::.~..jf.,1"~~:..-:t. ~;r;;_.~ \':~_.; ; i"i~~~1~7~~.~~~fi~i:f;~ :~i:'[::C " t' ",",1t~'\1.~.,tf t.J~;p'':-li., ,->fro'!''';: ~!h~~~>iI -~;::'- ~ ;;'~'~'" t'".. .~ f".~ ,J<, _ '1:"1" _. . Y';'~."'~' _ n;.)j,-::'" , :,:~~'l~;> ",., . :" ~, "'-'<-"'4 ''?>,}- <t: " "i ) id; '''''.,,, t-~' ..,~~ ;t':''",~....''''""t 1,""',,;;" ~A!' "'~ ~ ~ ~ ," ;t'~~~.~~}~1;.-..,.""'>- t.~,~, W~ ~"f~~>~.1 .4'",\,,~~ ~<r""1 )J~~""j ,~~~ ~....."' .4~" "-',:\X1.' ,;'-JJ, ~~/'.. ... r ,t:..,~~.... 'Y.; ?,tc"~~~'~;" -~. ..~~-n ...t': '" (.~ ",-'." .' 2 ~~~!~t~~~~!":;.-~'{,~, '-.;:( '';''''~,,:'~-." '")I' ,),,,~, ",.. -, " ''"' ,,;~ 4_" "'"'" '''.!. 9-' 'I!' "~:;, -, <P- ,,~......, ,,' < ,J, ,-';:;{-r' ,4f,'; ~" ~l' ~ in' : ~_,'" ~ 1; ~ t ~'t>\. z ~~, ? .....,__..:) ,.T_, f,' ~~~4'0!.,' , -, -~ ~~.' 1 1- .'.;.;". '<; .,.. ~,.......,,,!i'> ,," t<'>~, J<'!i,', ........,...,( 'I' f....--... "\'"-, 1" , ~,,,," ~~" ~'" '-{! -~ ..... ,," ....~...."1'~ 'O"'~~....:"~-~,::"C~'~^ 1_ ,'1:< _"......_;; " ~J j"'i\~~"- ""~ t <,:, -.> -', Y M ;:~~!i~'~~~~~2~f~b~j. r \';t:f.',;"" .~ _" ..~'~. .1" - " . ~ t" .... ", "",", "~~;, :{!t~;::,- ~'~~2~~~/f;.{~:.~~{~~~:~; :,:i'~-'~f~.;-:,:-~~~' .,. ." -do'),. ~"". ~",'.... 't'i.::- <t;W"'.,' >~.>t.1f-~;-"~'" :.. " ,),..1 ~ '~1,;~~'..c:;:-,~:.~,:~~;1:'~~~~4;)~ :,.:c:,.~r~;,~- ;',.~ ',' '*~'t<.,~~j....~:t..,.-~I.,j' ~ ~~'if:' ~ j;/..-, " .... ~<,;".~~~.i"'1./11A.'~ .' ,.},~ '!! 'wt.", 1':~ iJ~.( ~r,~g:,..:~.",'it? '~.<.......'-"'iI.:,..,~.... :'>'- ...,.. "'",~ I~:; }:'~,,,'l '>-~ .tj:b~ ,,';r. ',;. -.. ' ,~;, -, ':>0 'c~J,t?~~11.,.$,!, 'i!'...~ (If. _f>.,_ , #,.;<:- " /.' ..... - ;I ~ ~ I?, i!,. " ,'~~u" . ';; - 'A' L ~ ~l .....J...'t ::,.~/i\;!'",>,,"'tli\,~~,,-.~~"~~!- 1;:, 'r" \-!'~. ~>y" ""l< "I ~,~,~..t~':_i'\.'':... ',~ T~~< -",,',. :?'?;" ... ':'J~"'" ,,. ...".<< ... ,".;> ~'~~ ~- ~<_14,""t, ...~ ~4" ~:'..1f::. f""'-"'- .~.,;;.po....., "- " ~ :~"...' f/ :\,,,:,~/,'t.~~_,,- t.~, I:; .f> I ~ ~;t].':$ i:."-<);i~~.~!.;:",,~..~~ ~ '~~f"<~~':JE':<"" <~'"'rJ;J ":~F ".y~ ~:<.~....'" .~" ,~^< ---". ..,.p" ,~.... '* ' .," . :Y:;.:,!;,''':'' 1'1'.1 'f / -"..." 1-,""" 1 ~: ~ 'v~.Hj !:"..." "'... '" '~~.. .c::--"~ti~~\!i.;>~j'"1 '<Iow.';:fg.:~ffr..< !l~"-}~~*".,(jf.. " ~ ~ ',; r.~~" .;;t:.. '1r,;; _~~;i ~>_ ~'" ~!b.1'~'- ' I :r, ;~-<' ')!,1~_-.~.:i1,1""':!<.,~> -..,~.( ,.,~"'7I~~'''''''''' ~.t>",f''',,,,,,'S: ~ .~- ,: ~;" .;"'~:.;":'~~ ";3>;, '."t~:-';:; . ',.::'" :;., ,,'_ t, ~ {,<:<1:' P' #,::;.'_ .....%t'j.~...- ." ~~ M~_ . >.;;:J;j. "'Y-" "~~"."~~Y#1.~cf' " '~);~:"~~;~~j\;:::{;;~'{:":>i~ ~. rJ.::~"< ." ~.. " ~',' '~.:. .:: !-, " ~, 1. "~ ",". " ,< < ,< ~ , .. " .:r :!-'_:/ ,;- '., " :',:....,,," ,-";', '."'" " CHAIR Leonard Duhl, M.D. Professor of Public Health, Umv. of Caljfornia ot Berkeley HONORARY CO-CHAIRS Angela Blackwell Director, Urban Strategies Council, City of Oakland Henry G Cisneros, Secretary. U.S. Dept. of Housing and Urban Development Molly Joel Coye, M.D Director, California Dept. of Health Services David M. lawrence, M.D Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. Philip R. Lee, M.D. Assistant Secretary Health, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services ORGANIZING INSTITUTIONS California Department of Health Services Caljfornia Healthy Cities Project League of California Cities National Civic League UC Office of the President UC Berkeley UCLA US Public Health Service Western Consortium for Public Health World Health Organization BOARD OF ADVISORS Robert Aldrich, M.D Warren Bennis Somsook Boonyabancha Lester Breslow, M O. Patricia Buffler Concha Colomer, M.O Evelyne de Leeuw William Oyal Mary Jane England, M.O Beverly Flynn Jorge Hardoy Maxene Johnston Ilona Kickbusch Judith Kurland Lowell S. Levin Roy W Menninger, M.D. Jonas Salk, M.D. Martin Scherr Florence Stroud Harold Visotsky, M.D Anuradha Vittochi V T arzie Vittachi Bernice Weissbourd Michael Woo FOUNDATION/GOVERNMENT SPONSORS {to dote} The California Wellness Foundation Fetzer Institute Centers for Disease Control The John 0 and Catherine T MacArthur Foundation The Anne E. Casey Foundation Vesper Society EXCLUSIVE SPONSORS (to date) Kaiser Permanente Baxter Internotional, Inc. California Healthcore System: Alto Bates Medical Center California Pacific Medical Center Morin General Hospital Mills Peninsula Hospitols International Business Machines Corporation ROLM, A Siemens Company CORPORATE CO-SPONSORS (to date) Chiron Corporation The Clorox Company Delta DenIal Plans of California Genentech,lnc Mc Kinsey & Co. Inc. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Southern California Edison Co. QualMed PROGRAM COMMITEE Kevin Barnett Leonard Duhl, M.D. William Oyal Chris Gates Joe Hafey Trevor Hancock, M.D. Seth Katzman Real Lacombe, M.D. Karl Linn Henry Loubet T ameron Mitchell Tyler Norris Helena Restrepo, M.D Florence Stroud joan Twiss CONFERENCE COORDINATOR Judy Mings LJb-i CONTENTS MESSAGES 2 THE HEALTHY CITIES AND COMMUNITIES MOVEMENT: A SHORT HISTORY . PRESENTERS YOU'LL HEAR 6 HIGHLIGHTS OF CONFERENCE ACTIVITIES . Global Celebrations in San Francisco and Oakland National Health Awards Healthy Cities and Communities Gallery and Commons Site Visits: Explore Healthy Cities Projects in Action CREATE YOUR OWN AGENDA . Arrive Early: Pr.~confer.n<e Se..ions Conference Brealeout Sedlon. i'n'our Tracks Conference at a Glance More Conference Beakout Sessions MORE WAYS TO PARTICIPATE 26 Children's Express Poster Sessions Exhibits Advertising INFORMATION AND DETAILS 27 Fees Accommodations Travel CEU. Special Needs Spouse/Guest Tour Options P05t Conference Optional Tours REGISTRATION FORM 31 _ L/b ------ -J "Healthy Cities and Communities - people collaborating together to build the spirit of community connectedness." Henry Cisneros Secretary, US Department of Housing ond Urban Development "The future of health core delivery depends on integrating medical delivery services, public health services and all other community activities which con- tribute to disease prevention and health promotion. This conFerence is the perfect vehicle for exploring these priority issues." Dovid Lawrence, MD Choirman and CEO Koiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. "America's healthy cities of the future will be those that successfully build on the tremendous diversity of cultures and populations. The International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference will focus on the vital dynamic communities that are responding to this challenge." Angela Glover Blackwell President, Urban Strotegies Council City of Oakland, California L/ b ~ ?_ "Healthy Cities refers to a whole new way of dealing with problems. It is an attempt to loak at issues of the city, including health, within a brooder frame- work. In Healthy Cities, citizens, professionals, government and others rec- ognize the interconnections involved in community life and create collabora- tive relationships for a healthier future len Duhl, MD Professor, Public Health University of California at Berkeley "Reaching the goal of equitable, optimal health for all of our communities will be the most important public health achievement of our time - and it is within our grasp. Please join us at the first International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference." Molly Joel Coye, MD Director, Colifornia Department of Health Services "Improving the health of entire populations requires the cooperation of individuals and institutions at the local level and governments at local, state and national levels. The International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference is designed to share exam- ples of ways diverse communities are responding to new demands and crisis Philip R. lee, MD Head of the U.S. Public Health Service and Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Deportment of Health and Human Services _ /2/b-7 the healthy cities and communities movement A SHORT HISTORY Since 1950, the pace of urbanization has skyrocketed. tn less than twenty years 0 full 50% of the world's people will be living in cilies. At the some time, the cores of many older, once vibrant cities are witnessing a decline in their population as urban systems break down and people flee to the suburbs. Communities around the world are struggling with issues that hod previously not been thought of as "health related." They are faced with severe pollution, substance abuse, violent crimes, lock of education, unemployment, homelessness, and poor sanitary infrastructures which in turn lead to decreases in the health status of people. Never before has the world faced a more profound challenge, and dealing with this crisis calls for a bold new cooperative spirit among the people of the world and their governments. The complex nature of the problem and changing nature of the city itself suggests that the only solution is 0 col- laborative and participatory governa I sectors of the population. This approach has come to be known as thy lated progress around ode I and playa port eeds, homelessness, people from busi- as a vital part of mmunily. In an effort to foste 1986, developing a s the world . Today more in the Healthy Cities Move etc., the process is the sam ness, government and other se the strategy to solve problems and The rapid growth in the number of hea stories with each other, primarily througn other regions during the past seven years. communities shoring success meetings convened in Europe and This first global conference has been designed to explore and expand Healthy Cities projects by showcasing community responses to difficult issues through work sessions, plenaries, poster ses- sions, exhibits, site visits and other interactive events. Focus will be placed on the appreciation of Healthy Cities strategies across economic, political and organizational diFferentiators and translate them to practical take-home application. More than 80 work sessions will focus on one of four theme areas: Skills for Urban Improvement, Systems Issues, Civic Development, and the New Public Health. Additionally, four pre-conference sessions are being offered. They include Electronic Town Meetings and the Health of Your Community, an International Healthy Cities/Communities Network Leaders Meeting, a Seminar for Domestic and Foreign Journalists, and an Urban Mediation Training and Conflict Resolution Clinic. Here is your chance to meet and learn from practitioners of Healthy Cities projects from around the world. We welcome you to this maior event and challenge you to bring ideas, strategies and pro- grams back to your own community. You are the catalysts for change. Join us as we creale health- ier communities everywhere. #) / it ~<:;( photography by Keba Konte ..., '#t!'r 1:.# 41'" " .. l' ..r C', . f' ., , t.?!, Presenters Include Carl Anthony Director Urban Habitat Program Earth Island Institute A,T. Ariyaratne Sarvodaya Shamadana Sangamaya, Moratuwa Sri Lanka jahn Ashton Director Deportment of Public Health University of liverpool, England Shirley Boca State legislator, New Mexico Ximena de 10 Barra Habitat, Nairobi, Kenya Clem Bezold Executive Director Institute for Alternative Angelo Blackwelll President Urban Strategies Oakland, California Samsook Boonyabanchd,\ General Secretary Asian Coalition for Housing Rights Bangkok, Thailand Edgar S. Cohn Founder, Time Dollar Network Barry Checkoway Professor of Social Welfare University of Michigan David Chrislip Senior Associate National Civic league Michael Cohen Division Chief World Bank/Urban Development Division, (to be confirmed) Henry Cisneros Secretary U.S. Deportment of Housing and Urban Development (to be confirmed) Concho Colomer, MD Deputy Director Generalitat Valencia, Spain Peter Cove President, America Works Molly Coye, MD Director, California Department of Health Services Noel Day President, Polaris Thomas A. Droege Associate Director Interfaith Health Resources Center of The Carter Center Len Duhl, MD Professor of Public Health University of California, Berkeley Peter Edelman Counselor to the Secretory of Health & Human Services Sr Advisor to the White House Office of Notional Service Rodrigo Guerrero, MD Mayor, Cali, Colombia Trevor Hancock, MD Public Health Consultant Ontario, Canada Elihu Harris Mayor, Oakland, California Roger Hart Director Center for Human Environments Hazel Henderson Economist, Author Judith Heuman Asst. Secretary, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services David T, Ives Executive Director Camp Rising Sun Jean Paul Jardel, MD Assistant Director General WHO, Geneva Ilona Kickbusch Director, lifestyles and Health WHO-European Regional Office Ken Khosh"Chashm Regional Advisor WHO Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean C. Everett Koop, MD Former U.S. Surgeon General Judith Kurland Former Commissioner Boston Department of Health and Hospitals Real lacombe, MD Healthy Cities Project Consultant Quebec, Canada Jose Ramon lasuen Fmr Member of Parliament, Spain 00 David Lawrence, MD Chairman & CEO Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. Phil lee, MD Head, US Public Health Service Assistant Secretary US Dept. of Health & Human Services de Leeuw School of Health of limburg, Netherlands Sollevine Director Joint Program in Society and Health; Professor, Harvard Medical School Oren Lyons Associate Professor and Coordinator Native American Studies Program Stote University of New York at Buffalo, Face Keeper af the Onondaga Nation Joanna Macy Author, Professor California Institute of Integral Studies John McKnight Director, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University Andrew Mecca Director, California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs Meredith Minkler Professor, School of Public Health University of California, Berkeley Gottleib Monekosso, MD Regional Director WHO Regional Office for Africa Dean James Morton Very Reverend The Cathedral of St. John the Divine Patrick V Murphy Consultant on Public Safety U.S. Conference of Mayors Harold G. Nelson Director Graduate Programs in W Systems Design, Antioch Univ., Seattle Laurence J. O'Connell President and CEO The Park Ridge Center for the Study of Health, Faith and Ethics Michel O'Neill, MD Ecole des Sciences/Centre de Recherche, Quebec, Canada Gloria Johnson-Powell, MD Professor of Psychiatry Harvard Medical School ,. !t/}y III Ed Roberts President, World Institute on Disability Zia Sardor Economist and Consultant Government of Malaysia David Satterthwaite International Institute for Environment and Development London, England Raymond Shanholtz President Partners for Democratic Change Merv Silverman, MD Executive Director, Am FAR Catherine Sneed Director, The Gorden Proiect Florence Stroud Interim Director San Francisco County Health Deportment I. Tabibzadeh, MD Officer, District Health Systems WHO-Geneva, Switzerland Agis Tsouros, MD Coordinator Healthy Cities Project WHO, European Regional Office Irene Tinker Professor, Women's Studies/City and Regional Planning University of California, Berkeley Sym Van der Ryn Professor, School of Architecture University of California, Berkeley John Vasconcellos State Assemblyman State of California Lawrence Wallack Professor, School of Public Health Director, Berkeley Media Studies Group, University of California, Berkeley Nina Wallerstein, MD Assistant Professor Department of Family and Community Medicine Unive~,s"\:~~f New Mexico ~,i't"jjP/f' i,'."i/il!h, r ~.. Weissbourd amily Focus, Chicago eWilson ornia OSCAR ARIAS, FORMER PRESIDENT OF COSTA RICA, WINNER OF THE NOIEL PEACE PRIZE AND THE MARTIN LUTHER KING PEACE PRIZE "A healthy and just Northern hemisphere is inextricably tied to jus- tice and health in the Southern hemisphere" It JLjb~/) highlights of conference activities join global celebrations f. RECEPTIONS, MULTI CULTURAL FOODS, MUSIC, LIVE ENTERTAINMENT December 8 S.F. Hilton on Hilton Square December 9 Center for the Arts at Verba Buena Gardens December 10 The Oakland Convention Center if- C. EVERETT KOOP will present the C. Everett Koop National Health Awards, Wednesday, December 8 For the 2nd year, corporations will be applauded for worksite programs For the 1st time, awards will be made for community based programs display your story in the healthy cities and communities gallery participate in the commons The Healthy Cities and Communities Commons will be the hub of activity throughout the conference. With the Gallery os background, the tree lined Commons with its fountain will provide 0 lively yet relaxing space for sharing healthy foods and ideas. The Commons stage will provide opportunities for discussion of issues, entertainment and spontaneous presentations. Submit your community's story. We are requesting that visual materials be prepared on panel modules of 2 x 2 feet. Each project can be no more than four such modules which will be asssembled into a unified display. Photographs should be accompanied by easily readable lettering and text. The Healthy Cities and Communities Gallery projects will be displayed on a continuous enclo- sure surrounding the Commons area. Please send Gallery materials to. International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference, 5900 Hollis Street, Suite E, Emeryville, CA 94608 JL/b ~/2 _ site visits; explore healthy cities projects in action Choose from over 50 sites when you arrive Exomples include. SAN FRANCISCO: a garden project trains and hires former jail inmates to roise and sell vegeta- bles and flowers. OAKLAND: voluntary organizations, public agen- cies and collaborative community proiecls are clus- tered in a planned neighborhood of Victorian homes. BERKELEY: a shelter for homeless families and single people provides adult education, recovery services and 0 children's learning center SAN FRANCISCO: a non profit architectural design firm provides employment training, furniture design and manufacture, and live-work units 011 at the some site. RICHMOND: an agency working with chronically homeless people provides housing, job training, and employment in the San Francisco Boy Area community SAN FRANCISCO: a homeless shelter with an art program has sprouted an art gallery featuring the work of neighborhood residents and a successful greeting card business. OAKLAND: university/community collaboration to provide life skills training for children, youth and adults in the inner city SAN FRANCISCO: 0 landmark flatiron building converted to SRO and family housing for homeless citizens, offers a wide range of programs. BERKELEY: a tour of the Telegraph Avenue area near the UC Berkeley campus with special attention to Peoples' Park and the programs for homeless cit- izens which have grown up all oround. SAN FRANCISCCO: a large transistional residen- tial program for substance abusers and ex-offend ers offers jobs and training in restaurant operation, household moving, and printing. RICHMOND: a performing arts school for Inner- city citizens offers courses in drama, dance, video, and set design. create your own agenda arrive early: pre-conference opportunities december 7, 1993 "Electronic Town Meetings and the Health of Your Community" $75.00 ~ $100.00 fee ~ Registration is required Healthy communities are founded on collaboration, communication and participation. Electronic Town Meetings allow entire communities to collaborate, communicate and partici- pate around community issues by combining a live television discussion with simultaneous live random polling and voice mail. Exploding television channel capacity, interactive television networks and new telephone polling technology all mean that Electronic Town Meetings are becoming universally accessible and can be used to communicate about a multitude of issues. Don't miss out on experiencing first hand this community development tool and on learning how to use it at home. See Registration form at the end of this booklet to register for this session (ETM Seminarl "Urban Mediation Training and Conflict Resolution Clinic" $25.00 fee ~ Registration is required This pre-conference workshop focuses on the application of innovative and successful "mediat- ing" strategies for a range of problems and conflicts confronting urban communities. The workshop will be divided into two sections. MORNING: Experts will provide models for community, school, organization, environmental and ethnic conflict resolution systems and processes. This session will provide a broad range of "mediating structures and strategies". Audience participation will be encouraged. AFTERNOON: Experts will facilitate "clinics" where persons/communities with specific prob- lems and conflicts can discuss the type of mediating process that best relates to those issues. Clinics are only available to those who attend the morning session. See Registration form at the end of this booklet to register Workshop / pre-conference fees help defray conference costs. A limited number of scholar- ships are available. State need in writing when you register for the conference. "International Healthy Cities/Communities Networ~ Leaders Pre-con' Meeting" This conference is free ~ Registration is required "Seminar for Domestic and Foreign Journalists" leaders of Healthy Cities and Communities networks around the worl half-day pre-conference meeting on December 7, 1993 This event is designed primarily for leaders ot the state, provincial, regiona els and is co-hosted by the National Civic league and the California Health Focus will be on: Strengthening internal networks Strengthening external networks between cities/communities Building the international movement throughout the world For further information, please contoct: Tyler Norris or Chris Gates National Civic League 1445 Market Street, Suite 300 Deove', CO 80202 USA (8001 223,6004, (303) 571 ,4343, Journalists are invited to examine the key components of a "Healthy y meeting Healthy Cities leaders and reviewing case studies. They will actively explor is intensive seminar, the media's role in building a Healthy City. By shaping communi! Ivement to improve the quality of life, media professionals can be major Healthy Cities a s. If you are a journal- ist and want to attend, contact the Healthy Cities Conference office at (510) - 540-2412, Tel 0' (5101, 655 ' 2971, fax. 't JI6)) 1- 9 IT IS . " " conference break-out sessions wednesday, december 8 2:00 . 4:00 p.m. THE FOLLOWING CONTINUING EDUCATION UNITS {CEUSI MAY BE AVAILABLE FOR THE SESSIONS INDI- CATED, GENERAL {GENJ, CERTIFIED HEALTH EDUCATION SPECIALISTS {HEJ, REGISTERED NURSES {RNI AND SOCIAL WORKERS (SW). SEE INFORMATION AND DETAILS SECTION FOR INSTRUCTIONS. SKILLS FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT 101 Urban Conflicts and Effective Mediation (GEN, HE, SW) Panelists will present urban mediating systems and problem solving mechanisms for environmen- tal, school, community, ethnic and organizational conflicts. Experts with competency in differ- ent mediating models will engage participants in 0 dialogue of how applied conflict resolution systems can address a wide range of social conflicts. Ray Shanholtz, President, Partners for Democratic Change; other panelists to be announced. 102 Community Greening Projects: Tools for Empowering and Healing A discussion of the growth of sustainable healthy cities and the regeneration of multicultural grass roots urban neighborhoods through community gardening and urban farming. The ses- sion will focus on show-and-tell presentations, "how-to's", and small circle discussions of special issues. Establishment of an international Healthy Cities greening network will also be explored. Karl linn, Co-Founder, Urban Habitat Program, Trevor Burrows, Director, fast Palo Alto Historical and Agricultural Society; Cathy Sneed, Director, The Garden Project; Mohammed Nuru, S.F League of Urban Gardeners; Renaldo Cortez, Manager, Fresh Starf Farm. 103 Using Communications Technologies and Information Systems (GEN, HE, SWJ A discussion of the importance of communications technologies to the Healthy Cities movement, and how practitioners can introduce existing systems into communities to facilitate the develop- ment of Healthy Cities. Particular emphasis will be placed on how cities can use the technology to increase communication among community groups, local government, and health and city planning professionals. Michael McDonald, President, Windom Health Enterprises; other panelists to be announced. 104 The Quality of Life Index: Assessing Community Improvement (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Panelists will discuss how communities define what they want in 0 healthy city using the Quality of life Index. Attendees will learn how civic indexes are effectively combined with the develop- ment and use of community health indicators to paint a current picture of community perfor- mance and capacity Presenters will be from cities which have developed quality of life indexes. Tyler Norris, National Civic League; Jacqueline E. Stiff, MD, MSPH, City of Pasadena; Representatives from Jaccksonville, Florida and oher communities SYSTEMS ISSUES 105 Healthy Cities Around the World (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Presenters from Healthy Cities programs around the worfd will showcase the most innovative and successful models to date. Panelists will include elected and appointed officials and com- munity representatives from large and small cities with diverse populations. Numerous exam- ples will feature cross-sectoral collaboration to reach community goals. There will be four sessions, one offered each day of the conference, showcasing Healthy Cities pro- ;ects. Presenters in these sessions will include: Thomas Barnes, Mayor of Gary, Indiana; Dr. Rodrigo Guerrero, Mayor of Coli, Colombia; Theodore landsmark, Director, Healthy Boston; Julia McDonald, - )1-/ b -)y Councillor, City of Parksville, British Columbia, Herman Medina, Coordinator, Drug-Free Schools, Mora, New Mexico; Louisa Rogers, Coordinator, Healthy Communities, Mora, New Mexico; Lisa Salsberg, Policy Analyst, Healthy City Toronto, Dr Yoshyuki Watanabe, Department of Preventive Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine; Lela Folkers, Global Programme on AIDS, World Health Organization, Suva, Fiji; Dr Real Lacombe, Reseau Quebecois de Vi lies et Villages en Sante, Quebec, Canada; Joan M. Twiss, Director, California Healthy Cities Project; Representative from a Colorado Healthy Communities Project; Douglas Clark, City Manager, City of Escondido, CA; Tony Mills, Healthy Cities IlIawarra, Wollongong, Austrailia. 106 Integrating Social and land-Use Planning (GEN, SW) One of the major barriers 10 planning and developing healthy communities has been the tra- ditional separation of social and land-use planning. Recently, communities have begun tak- ing steps to end that separation. Panelists will describe their work in formulating human and social development policies integrated into land-use planning. Trevor Hancock, MD, Public Health Consultant; Ellis Katsof, Director, Community Services Division, Halton, Ontario. 107 Sustainable Models of Development Representatives from Kerala State in India, the Sarvodaya Movement in Sri lanka, and Mondragon in the Basque region of Spain will present three distinct models of sustainable development. The discussion will include issues of consumption and equity, balancing social, economic, cultural and spiritual values and an analysis of the cooperative model of economic development. Moderatof" Joanna Macy, Author and Professor, California Institute of Integral Studies. CIVIC DEVELOPMENT 108 Housing and Community-Based Actions A discussion of successful community-based actions, including the role of non-governmental organizations and local governments in supporting community initiatives and the role of national governments in stimulating and supporting community-based actions. David Satterthwaite, International Institute for Environment and Development, London, England; other pan- elists to be announced. 109 Healthy Businesses for Healthy Communities How businesses con develop healthy relationships with their communities and the environ- ment, including 0 discussion of values-focused business. Panelists will include representatives from business and financing organizations. James Nixon, Earth Trade; Claude Whitmyer, Center for Good Work; Ewin Ewald, Ecumenical Development Cooperative Society 110 Making Communities Safe - Moving Beyond Traditional policing The role of community policing in creating safe neighborhoods. Panelists will discuss critical factors in community policing, including police culture; police organization; staffing local neighborhood beats, community relations vs. committed, comprehensive community policing; "police vs. them" altitude and the issue of diversity Patrick V Murphy. Consultant on Public Safety, u.S. Conference of Mayors; other panelists to be announced. 111 Healthy Cities and the Family Support Movement (GEN, RN, HE, SW) Changing patterns of family life hove led to the emergence of family resource and support programs. Panelists will discuss the common elements of successful approaches to family support in Europe and the U.S. and how to incorporate family support into a Healthy Cities framework. Bernice Weissbourd, President, Family Focus; Robert W Chamberlin, MD, Consultant, Maternal and Child Health; Moria Chavez, Children, Youth, and Families Dept., Office of Community Planning, State of New Mexico. tit )1--//;;-13 112 Education: Supporting Healthy Communities Education is on essential element of 0 healthy city, and communities ore searching for new ways to teach the complex skills necessary to successfully navigate modern society Discussion will include educating homeless children, non school-based programs, universi- ty/community partnerships and kids teaching kids. Panelists to be announced. 113 Religious Communities Promoting Health The role of the religious community in health promotion and disease prevention. A discus- sion of essential elements to successful community health outreach. Participants will learn about creative models and activities sponsored by religious groups which focus on the health needs of their communities. The Rev Thomas A. Droege, PhD, Associate Director, Interfaith Health Resources Center, Carter Presidential Center, Emory University; Nancy Nielsen, Direc/or, Ten Parish Praiect, Intergeneratianal Health Center, San Jose, CA; Lois Peacock, RN, Director, Bay Area Health Ministries. THE NEW PUBLIC HEALTH 114 AIDS - Innovative Community-lased Programs (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Representatives from community-based programs will discuss successful models. Examples will include case-managed continuum of care and out-patient services. Maderafor: Merv Silverman, MD, Executive Direc/or, AmFAR; panelists to be announced. 115 Alcohol and Drugs: Youth Leadership and Empowerment (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Discussion will be on the model of youth in partnership with adults and the delivery of innov- ative programs that network, enhance, and promote healthy lifestyle choices for young peo- ple. Maureen Ketchum, Executive Director, The Youth Leadership Institute; Representatives from Los Angeles, Sonoma, Marin and Orange Counties. 116 Community-Oriented Primary Care [GEN, HE, RN, SW) Community-oriented primary care blends the traditional practice of medicine with public health: professionals working with the community to produce meaningful improvements in health. A discussion of new approaches to community-oriented primary training and devel- opment, and how this approach has been successfully adapted to the urban environment. Paul Boumbulian, DPA, MPH, Vice President Strategic Planning, Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas; Yvonne Coyle, MD, Director for Primary Care Research, Pork/and Memorial Hospital; Scott Row/and, CEO, Wellesly Hospital, Toronto; Brian Cornelson, MD, CCFP, Family and Community Medicine, Wellesly Hospital; Hugh Fulmer, MD, Director, Center for Community-Responsive Medicine. 117 Violence Against Women/Family Violence (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Domestic abuse of women and children is more than a personal tragedy There are far- reaching emotional, financial and societal consequences to the problem of family violence. Panelists will discuss innovative, constructive action through educotion and prevention, pub lie policy, training and support, and multicultural collaboration. Leni Marin, Family Violence Prevention Fund; representative from UNIFEM; other panelists to be announced. 118 Strategies for Independent Living Panelists will present new trends in public policy and highlight successful ways to be inclu sive of people with disabilities in the process of making cities "healthy." Focus will be on how community members from traditionally different perspectives can collaborate for the benefit of all. Ed Roberts, President, World Institute on Disabilify; Susan Stoddard, PhD, President, InfoUse, Berkeley, California; Kathy Martinez, International Proiecfs Manager, World Instifute on Disability ~ )1/6 -/~ 119 Building Community Capacity for Mental Health Promotion (GEN. HE, RN, SW) This session will focus on efforts to expond the scope of mental health services ond planning beyond treatment of the chronically mental ill, and into the realm of community-based mental health promotion. Discussion will include the movement to establish or strengthen community support structures that increase the capacity of residents to prevent and respond to stress producing life events. Measures include shared child care services, neighborhood recre- ational activities, urban farming and service barter centers. Leonard Duhl, MD, Professor, School of Public Health, Universify of California at Berkeley; Shuli Goodman, Coordinator, Bay Area Community Mental Health Initiative; Florence Stroud, Interim Director. San Francisco Deportment of Public Health; Dione Adams, Director, Merritt Institute. thursday, december 9 10:30 a.m. . 12:30 p.m. SKillS FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT 201 Media Advocacy. Promoting the Voice of Community (GEN, HE. RN, SW) Media advocacy, in contrast to social marketing approaches, is a tool that can help commu- nities use their voice. A discussion of media advocacy approaches to promoting healthy public policy, emphasizing the use of news by public health activists to set the agenda, frame the problem from the policy perspective and advance policy solutions over time. Lawrence Wallack, ProFessor of Public Health, Director, Berkeley Media Studies Group, University of California, Berkeley; other panelists to be announced. 202 Effective Leadership Models for Healthy Cities (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Discussion will be on critical skills needed by today's leaders, both in government and the private sector, to catalyze and convene collaborative initiatives that address issues of shared concern in developing a healthy city Case studies from healthy cities leaders and examples of leadership training efforts will be described. Coral Spain, Director, Public Health Leadership Institute, David Chrislip; Senior Associate, National Civic League; Sumedha Khanna, MD MPH, International Health Consultant, other panelists to be announced. 203 Children and Youth Participation in Planning (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Panelists will discuss participatory planning, including children's participation in community development. Models will demonstrate how participation can result in significant social change and contribute to a healthy community Susan Goltsman and Daniellacofano, Principals, Moore, lacofano and Goltsman; Roger Hart, Director, Center for Human Environments; Diana Bichler, Director of Court Services, Los Angeles County Dept. of Children's Services; Gene Zimmerman, USDA Forest Service, Arrowhead District. 204 Strategies for Empowerment in Communities (GEN, HE, SW) Community empowerment will be discussed, including examples from service providers, pub- lic agency administrators, policy makers, community-based organizations and community residents of diverse backgrounds. Implications and challenges associated with intersecloral collaboration will also be reviewed. Barry Checkoway, ProFessor of Social Medicine, University of Michigan; John McKnight, Director, Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University; Nino Wallerstein, Assistant ProFessor, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of New Mexico. .tt It/b ---j 7 1- .. 1t $ . 1: . 1- .. ft $ . r " SYSTEMS ISSUES 205 Community Architecture and Neighborhood Planning Cose study presentations of neighborhood planning and building by inhabitants. Discussion will focus on how community-based architecture and planning can be nurtured and current barriers to local initiatives overcome. Sym Van der Ryn, Professor, School of Architecture, University of California, Berkeley; other panelists fa be announced. 206 International Development Strategies for the 21st. Century This session will explore current trends in international development policy Panelists will focus on values and belief systems, and the impact of tailoring development strategies to cul- tural traditions. Discussion will also include the impact of structural adjustment policies and the appropriate role of development agencies. Hazel Henderson, Economist, Author; Irene Tinker, Professor of Women's Studies and City and Regional Planning, University of CaliFornia, Berkeley; Michael Cohen, Division Chief, World Bank Urban Development Division (to be confirmed); Harold Nelson, Director, Graduate Program in Whole Systems Design, Antioch University, Seattle. 207 Diversity and Healthy Cities Increasingly mobile populations and changing patterns of migration and immigration have created culturally diverse communities around the world. This blending of cultures requires new models of partnership and consensus-building. Panelists will discuss programs which have successfully bridged these differences and built on this tremendous diversity to form the basis for a healthier community. Oren Lyons, Coordinator, Native American Studies Program, State University of New York at Buffalo and Face Keeper For the Onondaga Nation; representotive From the Healthy Boston Project; other panelists to be announced. 208 Healthy Cities Around the World (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Presenters from Healthy Cities programs around the world will showcase the most innovative and successful models to date. Panelists will include elected and appointed officials and community representatives from large and small cities with diverse populations. Numerous examples will feature cross-sectoral collaboration to reach community goals. CIVIC DEVELOPMENT 209 Spiritual Values - Links with Community Health The spiritual life of a community can play an integral part in promoting the health of its mem- bers. Panelists will discuss the ways that diverse religious groups have integrated spiritual and social concerns to create healthier communities. Other issues discussed will include how to develope a healthy dialogue with religious groups, and who to trust in the religious commu- nity. The Rev Jock Lundin, author, lecturer, and consultant; Laurence). O'Connell, PhO, President and CEO, The Pork Ridge Center For the Study of Health, Faith and Ethics; Dean James Morton, Cathedral of St, John the Divine, New York; other panelists to be announced. 210 The Role of Art in Improving Communities The arts have been underutilized as a tool for community development. Artists ore catalysts for change and can be valuable participants in efforts that improve the quality of life. Discussion will include the role of art in education, arts and cross-cultural communication, arts and economic development, arts in the delivery of human and social services, and art partner- ships between public and private sectors. Joanne C. Kozberg, California Arts Council; other pan- elists to be announced 211 Transportation: Reclaiming Cities from the Automobile (GEN) A discussion of ways to reduce automobile dependency, promote transit, bicycles and pedes- trian streets, link transportation and land use, and promote social justice in transportation ,. IYb/l?: planning. The facus wiH be on constructive actions that citizens and governments are taking to solve current transportation problems. Stephen Wheeler, Urban Ecology; Henry Holmes, Urban Habitat; other panelists to be announced. 212 Community Economic Development Community economic development and the community development corporation model will be covered. Panelists will give presentations on the uniqueness of their particular community development corporation. Arthur Blaustein, College of Environmental Design, University of California, Berkeley; other panelists to be announced. 213 America's Gunsters: The Threat to Public Safety (GEN, HE, SW) The widespread availability and possession of lethal weapons and their everyday use by both criminals & "ordinary people" have raised serious questions about the capability of the police to protect America's citizens. Discussion will include a focus on what can be dane to disarm criminals and reduce the number of inappropriate weapons in urban and other com- munities. Arnold Sogalyn, Sagalyn Associates; other panelists to be announced THE NEW PUBLIC HEALTH 214 New Integrated Health Systems (GEN, HE, RN, SW) As increasing responsibility for health services and programs falls on local communities, new ways of structuring those services need to be developed. Panelists will discuss models for integrating the public, private and non-health sectors into the health system. Molly Joel Coye, MD, Director, California Deportment of Health Services; other panelists to be announced. 215 Environmental Justice and Community Health Presenters will discuss the environmental justice concept, emphasizing the needs of low income communities and people of color The focus will be on how communities have orga- nized for health and safely, and the involvement of religious leaders in the environmental justice movement. Robert Murphy, President, Seventh Principle Proiect; other panelists to be announced. 216 Unintentional Injury Prevention (GEN, HE, RN, SW) A discussion of the scope of the unintentional injury problem and some of the key factors to consider when developing prevention initiatives. Panelists will reflect on both successes and lessons learned from their injury prevention efforts. Lorry Cohen, Contra Costa County Prevention Program; other panelists to be announced. 217 Alcohol and Drugs: Building Political Currency for Healthy Cities (GEN, HE, RN, SW) A vision for healthier communities can only be realized by building politica! currency. Panelists with first-hand experience in community organizing, multicultural mobilization, intergovernment and interagency coordinotion, and political advocacy will discuss the prin- ciples of "inclusion" and "accountability" necessary for developing political currency Andrew Mecca, Director, California Deportment of Alcohol and Drug Programs; Vicki Butcher; Margaret Iwanga-Penrose, Union of Pan Asian Communities; Irene Redondo Church ward, Executive Director, Project INFO; Bonnie Duran, Choir, Native American Constituent Committee. 218 Sociocultural Barriers to Health Care A panel discussion on sociocultural barriers to health care and successful approaches to reducing them. Panelists will discuss specific barriers on the part of both providers and con- sumers, the consequences of barriers, and policies, procedures and programs to reduce them. Thomas W Chapman, Director, Opening Doors: A Program to Reduce Sociocultural Barriers to Health Care, Washington, DC, other panelists to be announced. It ) t/b / /1 con f er e ., c e WEDNESDAY DECEMBER B THURSDAY D I C 1M I,-':R 9 .,341 ',t' IDIClOh..m. I"~ 9:00 a.m. . t 2=00 noon p L E N A R y L 8REAKOUT SESSIONS 10'30 o.m. . 12:30 p.m. 201 Media Advocacy: Promoting ta.. Vol~'oI Community 202 Effective Leadership Mod.l. for Healthy eltie. 203 Children ond Youth Participation in Plonning 204 Strategies for Empowerment in Communities 205 Community AN:hi'ecture and Neighborhood Planning 206 .......MticmaJ hvelopment Strategies for the "'Celjtviy ,'antI'Healthy Citl.. :Cttiu Around the World ::v.ru.. .. Link. with Com"'un;'y He..lth ~_ of Art in Improving Communltie. , . ~rtf ltecktimifte Clfl.. from the p E N .f< :!:;~ii~~~~;i :j::', ::;~~! '!\ill\ ;~Ii ~ ' ,'" , R,d,.t ~ 11,\ \ :!;. ~1 -~ glance FRIDAY DECEMBER 10 SATURDAY DECEMBER 11 t.i ~~~;;" P LEN A R '\.)"0' i;i::!~'" BREAKOUT SESSIONS I'A'.\. ~'tPt 0; 9:30 .. 11 :30 a.m. ~~~_J" ... Art of Building Coalition. for Community '" ' Empowerment 302 Currtmt ReMarch and Evaluation of Healthy Cities Prqrom. Wo....n..J.H Innovations Expand Healthy Citl.. FunclIne Healthy Citi.. Healthy CItIea _un<! tho World Urban Futun. Thr..,.h Community Vi.lonine Healthy COIftpclftieSi Healthy Communitl.. Education: Creating Healthy Schools Changing Synems for Children and Famitie. Housing: Model. of Resident Partieipotion Public Ind./PrivCtt. Mtton. Recreation in Healthy Communitl.. Violence Prevention and He.lthy Citi.. Community..8aled Action for a Healthful Environment AIDS; Community ".pon... M..... .... _tol Hoalth ...........m. ToIHa4:co Controll Toward a Healthier Community hlf.HoIp Graupt In Healthy CItm , ..00 . 9.00 a.m. y 303 30. 30S 30. 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 31. 315 31. 317 ". 1:2'4!~ ..... . ,s.oo p..... . ,-, ..>' ;t..", <' Oakland BREAKOUT SESSIONS 8:30 - 10:30 a.m. 401 Tool. and Techniques for Engoging Community Participation 402 Academic Institutions ond Community Empowerment 403 Healthy Cities Around the World 404 Organi:d"8 Around the U.N. 405 Physical ond Social De.lsn of Muslim Citi.. 406 Lotin Amertcon Healthy Citi.. 407 Economic Conv.ulan; Military ao.. Closure, 408 Doe. My Community Care About Met - Children S_k 409 Educations rransformlng ......ftiq cmcI Commvnfty Health .'0 Popv1at;on'DontatFaphl< C......... for HoaIIh 411 tnnovo.w. Model. for Job TroIni... and EconomicDevelopmen' 412 New parodigm Organization.: Nurturins Local Economiu .,3 CaNgivlns Co..muni''" 414 The Art. 0$ Educator .15 Tobocco Control: Smoke-Fr.. CItiu 41. Imrlromaefttallmpact AI...sment: Promoting Itwf.....m.n... ....fth .,7 ,I!aP","""",,,_ _1_ "~1. ':;'~~~:i~~~ ~....... omI ....... Proctic.. ,:;;::.:;.:ii;,1:~Jt,rj ~1ii~;,;-,;., :"" '< . ' i~"' ',110.; 1'tI,O .,.';, ' Hm:>~<:! ""'.' y "\i~:(:~;.:l :. ,,' $:: ;' , H', ".< ::\; { 4ft 219 Social Rehabilitation and Mental Health Support (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Social rehabilitation approaches to mental health support and services emphasize treat- ment in normalizied settings. This approach also focuses on abilities rather than disabili- ties, and promotes growth and change through programs which are vital parts of the com- munities they serve. Consumer activists, providers of social rehabilitation services and mental health policy makers will discuss the role of this new vision. Steve Fields, Executive Director, Progress Foundation; other panelists to be announced. thursday, december 9 2:00 - 4:00 p.m. 250 Governance of Healthy Cities Previously, government has been fragmented, with categorical funding and rigid roles and responsibilities, inhibiting the development of healthy cities and communities. Representatives from stole and city governments in the U S. and other countries will pre- sent examples of new collaborative arrangements between public and private sectors, spe- cialized interests and among diverse populations. Common concern for community well- being will be shown as the catalyst for creativity and change. John Vasconcellos, California State Assemblyman; Shirley Baca, State Legislator, New Mexico; Jose Ramon Lasuen, Former Member of Porliament, Spain; Peter Edelman, Counselor to the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Senior Advisor to the White House Office of National Service; other panelists to be announced. 251 Healthy and Sustainable Cities (GEN) Cities have a major impact on the health of the biosphere, using massive quantities of resources, but also creating what William Rees has called "ecological footprints" many times their size through the production of waste. Healthy cities must be sustainable. This panel will discuss the links between "healthy" cities and "sustainable" cities, presenting examples of cities and communities, new, old and yet to be built, that are taking steps in the right direction. Trevor Honcock, MD, Public Heolth Consultant; Carl Anthony, Director, Urban Habitat Program, Earth Islond Institute; Robert F Woollord, MD, Dept. of Family Practice, University of British Columbia; Peter Gavelin, City of Sundsvall, Sweden, Environmental and Health Office; Guy Dauncey, Bamberton Proiect, Victorio, British Columbia; other panelists to be onnounced. 252 Cities Working for Children (GEN, HE, RN, SW) The ultimate concern of healthy cities is the well-being of those who live in them. In order to work well for children and families, communities ore planning and implementing strate- gies to link and integrate services, re-think funding patterns and train personnel to function in ways that are supportive rather than destructive to families. In the process of taking responsibility for their families, every sector of the community needs to be included: schools, social services, mental health and health services, businesses, parents, policy- makers and the media. In this workshop, panelists who are actively involved in develop- ing communities that work for children and families will discuss successful programs. Donald M. Fraser, Mayor of Minneapolis; Gloria Johnson-Powell, Professor of Psychiatry, Horvard Medical School; other panelists to be announced. ,. JLjb-)J.- friday, december 10 9:30 - 11 :30 a.m. SKILLS FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT 301 The Art of Building Coalitions for Community Empowerment {GEN, SW, HE} Panelists will highlight the challenges and potential opportunities associated with collabora- tive partnerships between different kinds of institutions, organizations and agencies. Examples from successful collaborative efforts will also be presented. David Foster, Program Director, Community Partners, Amherst, Massachusetts; Barry Checkoway, Professor of Social Medicine, University of Michigan, other panelists to be announced. 302 Current Research and Evaluation of Healthy Cities Programs (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Healthy Cities programs have been part of a practice-oriented movement. Nevertheless, researchers from all over the world have devoted time and energy to investigate and evaluate it. This working session will focus on community research priorities and the producers and users of this research. Evelyne de Leeuw, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research on Healthy Cities, University of Limburg, Netherlands; Michel O'Neill, Centre de Recherche en Sante Cammunauta;re, Ecole des Sciences Infirmieres, Universite Laval, Quebec. 303 Women-Led Innovations Expand Healthy Cities (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Panelists will discuss breaking out of the white male-dominated health promotion model to develop partnerships which better reflect strengths and concerns of women and girls. Speakers will collectively address the three main principles of the Healthy City model: envi- ronment, economics and equity. Marilou McPhedran, Corporate Director, Healthy Oty Toronto; Candy Kinsmen, Women's Community Economic Development Network, Taranto; other panelists to be announced. SYSTEMS ISSUES 304 Funding Healthy Cities Programs which promote healthy cities and communities require diverse financial support mechanisms. Innovative approaches to getting and using financial resources will be present- ed. Panelists will discuss new roles for foundations, identifying potential funding streams and making the most of local resources. Judith Kurland, Former Commissioner, Boston Dept. of Health; Robert Weissbourd, Board of Directors, Shore Bank; Paul Rosenblum, President, Keystone Venture Partners. 305 Healthy Cities Around the World (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Presenters from Healthy Cities programs around the world will showcase the most innovative and successful models to date. Panelists will include elected and appointed officials and community representatives from large and small cities with diverse populations. Numerous examples will feature cross-sectoral collaboration to reach community goals. 306 Urban Futures Through Community Visioning In exploring the world of vision in detail, healthy community visioning is a complete inspira- tional statement of what needs to be created. Many healthy community programs have included a conscious vision component. This session will define visioning in relation to other aspects of healthy community development and the use of vision in various communities. Clem Bezold, Executive Director, Institute for Alternative Futures; other panelists to be announced. 4t /'I/:;--,2;r 1- .. , $ . 1: . 1- 9 r- f?J .. r " CIVIC DEVELOPMENT 307 Healthy Companiesl Healthy Communities This session will focus on how business and lobor are working cooperatively to create healthy, productive companies that in turn contribute to the health of workers, their families and their communities. New models will be presented thai are changing organizational culture and improving the quality of work life. Mary Jane England, MO, President, Washington Business Group on Health; John M. Burns, MD, Vice President, Health Management, Honeywell, Inc., Liz Cronin, Director, International Benefits, Levi Strauss & Co., Margaret Jordon, RN, MPH, Vice President, Health Care and Employee Services, Southern California Edison Co. 308 Education: Creating Healthy Schools (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Presenters will highlight three distinct approaches to creating healthy schools. A dialogue will follow between the audience and the panelists to gain an understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of each model, and an appreciation of the necessary conditions under which each model can succeed. Rob Simmons, California Dept. of Health Services, Schoo/- Linked Services; Lenore Zedosky, Director of Healthy Schools Program, West Virginia Dept. of Education; other panelists to be announced. 309 Changing Systems for Children and Families (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Promising efforts and innovative practices in changing the health care, early education, child care and child welfare systems will be presented. Robin Britt, Secretory of Human Resources, State of North Carolina; Dolores Ho/mes, Director of Fami/y Focus, Evanston, It. 310 Housing: Models of Resident Participation (GEN, HE, SWJ This session draws on the experiences of the self-help housing movement in the U.S. Panelists will discuss models of resident participation at all levels of the housing develop- ment process, in which residents assume responsibilities for planning, managing, decision- making, program design, implementation and ownership. Panelists will discuss shelter and affordable housing programs, including cooperative housing, community organizing by the homeless and poor, vacancy take-over, tenant management and community land trusts. Nicolo Mcintyre, Morin Housing Authority; other panelists to be announced. 311 Public Ends/Private Means How to convert the public will without the intermediary of government, the concept of "more governance and less government" will be discussed, as will community programs which have "disintermediated" the bureaucracy from public purpose. Peter Cove, President, America Works; Edgar S. Cohn, Founder, Time Dollar Network; Robert Weissbourd, Board of Directors, Shore Bonk. 312 Recreation in Healthy Communities This session will examine the role of recreation in "re-creating" healthy, well-rounded indi- viduals and families, as an essential element of healthy cities and communities. Community involvement in setting priorities and designing opportunities for health-promoting recreation activities will be discussed. David T Ives, Executive Director, Camp Rising Sun, Rhinebeck, New York; other panelists to be announced. _ lib ~2tj .-.-- THE NEW PUBLIC HEALTH 313 Violence Prevention and Healthy Cities (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Violence has pervaded our culture and become commonplace in many communities. Violence is preventable. This panel will address some of the root causes of violence as well as several key factors to consider when developing violence prevention initiatives. Recommendations will be mode for using the Healthy Cities approach to develop solutions to the problems of violence. Larry Cohen, Contra Costa County Prevention Program; other panelists to be announced. 314 Community-Based Action for a Healthful Environment Neighborhood and community organizations have redefined "environmentalism" to include the quality and health of a community's environment. Local efforts ore thriving throughout the developed and developing world. leaders of community campaigns will explore a variety of issues, coalitions and organizing techniques that have led to real changes in both the local use of toxic substances and the restoration of open space, particularly in low-income neigh- borhoods and communities of color. Elinor Blake, MSW, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, Calif. Dept. of Health Services; other panelists to be announced. 315 AIDS: Community Responses (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Communities around the world are searching for ways to deal with the crisis of AIDS. Panelists will discuss innovative programs of education, prevention and core. Panelists to be announced. 316 Models for Mental Health Programs A discussion of model mental health programs, including the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation program to improve mental health services for the persistently mentally ill in a number of cities across the United States. The program focuses on developing a coordinated system of care through the integration of service programs and funding streams. Saul Feldman, Chairman and CEO, u.s. Behavioral Health: other panelists to be announced. 317 Tobacco Control: Toward a Healthier Community (GEN, HE, RN, SW) This session will highlight how cities, both in the U.S. and abroad, have developed ordi- nances and policies to make smoke-free environmenfs the norm rather than the exception. Included will be 0 focus on how communities have employed social marketing to help main tain on environment supportive of non-smokers, and involvement of local residents to educate the public. Evan Braude, Council Member, City of iong Beach, California; Stella Aguinaga, representa- tive From Brazil; other panelists to be announced. 318 Self-Help Groups in Healthy Cities Throughout the world, the exponential growth in self-help groups is enabling many communi- ties to tap underutilized resources. Panelists will discuss the impact on public health systems, on specific diseases and on people of color. Projects & programs which assist people in learning about self-help groups & locating groups in their communities will be presented, along with data on the effectiveness of self help groups. Fran Dory. Executive DJrector, California Self.Help Center; Mike Goldstein, UCLA School of Public Health; Amye Leong, Young at Heart (Arthritis Support Group). at ILl/;; /;25 saturday, december 11 8:30 - 10:30 a.m. SKILLS FOR URBAN IMPROVEMENT 401 Tools and Techniques for Engaging Community Participation (GEN, HE, SW) Projects that have involved residents of all ages, backgrounds and ethnicities will be dis- cussed. Participants will explore case studies that have resulted in significant social change. Daniel Jacofano and Carolyn Verheyen, Moore, lacofano and Goltsman; Emily Gabel, Project Manager, Los Angeles Planning Division, David Watkins, Senior Planner, City of Pasadena. 402 Academic Institutions and Community Empowerment A discussion of approaches that involve academicians in community revitalization. Panelists will explore the role of the university in the community empowerment process. Meredith Minkler, Professor of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley; Edward Blakeley, Professor, City and Regional Planning, University of California, Berkeley SYSTEMS ISSUES 403 Healthy Cities Around the World (GEN, HE, RN, SW) Presenters from Healthy Cities programs around the world will showcase the most innovative and successful models to dale. Panelists will include elected and appointed officials and community representatives from large and small cities with diverse populations. Numerous examples will feoture cross-sectoral collaboration to reach community goals. 404 Organizing Around the U.N. Issues of women, development, environment, housing, human rights and law Strategies for advancing health around the world include both governmental and nongovernmental interna- tionalorganizing. Panelists will discuss how decades for women, development, environ- ment, housing and law expand awareness, consensus and involvement, and move diverse communities toward building a common agenda for a Healthy World. Ann Fagan Ginger, Executive Director, Meiklejohn Civil Liberties Institute; Representative from UNIFEM; Ximena de 10 Barra, Habitat; other panelists to be announced. 405 Physical and Social Design of Muslim Cities (GEN, HE, RN, SW) A discussion of the physical and spiritual aspects of healthy cities. Panelists will provide an analysis of historic and contemporary circumstances which have led to the present structure of politics and power in Muslim cities, including its relation to the problems of expanding cities, the provision of municipal services and the basic level of health and welfare. Ayyub Malik, Chapman Taylor Partners, London, England; Zia Sardar, Economist and Consultant to the Government of Malaysia; Professor Guizar Haider, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada. 406 Latin American Healthy Cities A presentation of innovative healthy cities and communities programs in Latin America. Representatives from Colombia, Chile and Cuba will discuss creative approaches to improv- ing health and quality of life in Latin American cities. The session will be conducted in Spanish, with English translation. Dr. Janet de 10 Vega, PAHO/Chile; other panelists to be announced. _ FIb -:L~ CIVIC DEVELOPMENT 407 Economic Conversion: Military Base Closures The reduction in defense spending and the subsequent closure of military bases present both an economic crisis and an opportunity to redirect resources toward the formation of healthier, more productive communities. Panelists from the U.S and the Philippines will discuss the challenge of economic conversion for their communties. Richard Gordon, Mayor of Olongapo, Philippines; other panelists to be announced. 408 Does My Community Care About Me? - Children Speak This session will focus on programs directed toward young people to both "bring them back" and encourage them to "give back" to their community. Panelists and the moderator will be young people. A discussion will describe services by and for young people, such os drop-in centers, job training, and environmental programs. Panelists to be announced. 409 Education: Transformative Learning and Community Health Discussion will include the role of education in multicultural diversity and unity, community involvement in learning, and wark with disenfranchised communities. Presenters will also explore holistic education approaches, the establishment of communities of learning; the use of museums, community centers and other informal education settings, and the establishment of curriculum that emphasizes city, global and systemic perspectives. Ian Grand, Professor, California Institute of Integral Studies; other panelists to be announced. 410 Population/Demographic Changes for Health A discussion of the population and demographic changes in cities around the world and their implications for health. Included will be the health components of a population policy and population components of a health policy and the importance of meeting women's reproduc- tive health needs in cities with limited resources. Panelists to be announced. 411 Innovative Models for Job Training and Economic Development Jobs and employment are esential elements of healthy communities. This session will high- light programs which promote economic opportunity and develop skills and resources within the community. Panelists to be announced. 412 New Paradigm Organizations: Nurturing Local Economies Through Technology and Networking This workshop will highlight projects which apply entrepreneurial approaches to the provision of social services by channeling local resources and initiative into local economic develop- ment. Examples include electronic support networks which use communications and video technologies to deliver health and social services, community banks, and the networking of economically marginal projects to form viable partnerships. Mike Hollinshead, EthoCorp., Edmonton, A/berta, Canada; other panelists to be announced. THE NEW PUBLIC HEALTH 413 Caregiving Communities This session will explore innovative models for providing caregiving services to people with disabling conditions. Special focus on how resources are shared to create safe and effective support structures which enhance the independence of people with special care needs. Panelists will discuss the process of developing and managing collaborative efforts and some common lessons and challenges. Panelists to be announced. tit Flb/27 1- '9 , $ .. 1: " 1- .. , $ .. r " 414 The Arts as Educator Numerous health messages have been successfully communicated through thealre and the arts. Panelists will discuss successful examples of educational art and theatre, approached from a social marketing perspective, os well as explore other non-traditional approaches to community education. Maureen Hanrahan, Director of Community Medicine, Kaiser Permanente, Denver; other panelists fa be announced, 415 Tobacco Control: Smoke-free Cities Infrastructure paradigms for change at the national, state and local level. Perspectives from the U.S. and other countries on their funding, program design and accomplishments in taba- co control will be highlighted. The session will explore the multinational journey toward tobacco control and education. Carol M. Russell, Chief, Local Programs Unit, Tobacco Control Section, California Deportment of Health Services; Anne Klink, MPH, Proiec/ Oirec/or, Smoke Free Cities Program, California Healthy Cities Proiect. 416 Environmental Impact Assessment: Promoting Environmental Health A discussion of new methods of health risk assessment which offer opportunities to improve how human health concerns are addressed, and which promote more effective involvement of community organizations in the decision-making process. Rainer Fehr, MO, PhO, lOIS, Bielefeld, Germany; William Pease, PhD, Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, University of California, Berkeley; Raymond Neutra, MO, Acting Chief, Environmental Health Investigations Branch, California Dept. of Health Services. 417 Population-Based Medicine Presenters will discuss population-based medicine, including how health systems look at the needs of the community, and linkages between health systems and public health depart- ments. Mitch R. Greenlick, PhO, Direc/or, Center for Health Research, Portland, OR; other panelists to be announced. 418 Alternative Medicines and Health Practices Health services need to be part of a comprehensive health system and reflect the diversity of the population they are designed to serve. Panelists will discuss "alternative" medical and health practices and ways of integrating them into the broader system to encourage greater participation and promote the health of all members of the community Benjamin R. Tong, PhD, Executive Direc/or, Institute for Cross Cultural Research; other panelists to be announced. ,. /'16 /';Lg/ - J'/b /.).; j J. :ii f {" more ways to participate children's express Children's Express, a national/international news service staffed by pre-teen reporters and teenage editors, will hold two days of hearings in a location near the conference headquarters. local and international health experts will appear as witnesses to be interviewed by Children's Express (CE) children ages 9 - 13 on Wednesday and Thursday of the conference week. On Friday, CE will report Findings from the hearings at a news conference to be held in the historic First Unitarian Church in Oakland, in the room where UNESCO was founded 48 yeors ago. In preparation for these hearings the CE reporters and editors have been engaged in 0 six-month long investigation of inner-city health conditions affecting children. Children around the world are being encouraged to participate. For more information, please contact: Mary Ganz, CE Director (510) 465 - 2200 Tel. (510) 465 - 2351 Fax. CHilDREN'S EXPRESS, c/o The Center for Urban Family Life, 685 14th Street, Oakland, CA 94612 USA. poster sessions You are invited to present a poster to display and discuss your work, and participate in an idea exchange with other conference attendees. The Poster Session will be held on Thursday, December 9, from 4:00 to 6:00 pm. At least one person from your organization must be present at all times. Presenters are required to pay Full registration fees and all other expenses involved in attending the meeting. Instructions for Poster Presentations: Poster board area is approximately 4 feet square. Your agency name and project name must be noted at the top of each poster letters must be 1 inch high. All other lettering should be at least 1/2 inch high, in bold font. If hand written, use a wide tip felt marker. Keep in mind that posters will be viewed from distances of 3 feet or more. Be sure to label each section of your poster (e.g., program description, outreach strategies, etc.). Cover major aspects of your program - including 0 brief project description, target population, educational setting and materials used or developed. Make statements simple, clear and self- explanatory Include the name of a contact person for further inFormation about your project. See Registration Form at the end of this booklet to sign up. Although the poster session is free, reservations for a poster display area are required. Deadline is November 19. exhibit opportunities Join the Exhibitor Partnership Promenade and show attendees how to produce healthier com- munitiesl Innovative leaders from around the world will be showcasing their ideas, products and services which help communities thrive. This is an opportunity to reach an estimated 1500 conFer- ees. Share the latest inFormation, ideas, products and tools with conFerence participants. The Exhibitor Partnership Promenade will be at the core of activity throughout the con- ference, and me will be located in a commons area next to the exhibits. Reserve your exhibit space today rental prices are $850 Commercial and $450 for Non-Profits. Price includes oth, with backdrop and side rails, 24 hour security, one complimentary confer- o post conFerence mailing list of registronts. $500 per table top for Commercial organizations and $100 for Non-profits. oose to reserve 1/2 table top space For $50. advertising in the conference program! It's the perFect opportu- xpected 1,500 attendees and over 500 speakers and panelists from Quarter Page $250 (3 1/4 inches x 4 3/4 inches) Business Card Size $150 For more information, contact the International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference office and request the Exhibitor Prospectus. ,. /lb~JtJ information and details Fees - $325 U.S. Through November 19 $375 U.S. After November 19 Accommodations - The International Healthy Cities and Communities Conferen Hotel is the San Francisco Hilton on Hilton Square. Conference rates are $ and $130 - $150 (double or tWin). Call l-aOO-HILTON and ask for the Heal group rate. For our international registrants: Please phone (415) 771 - 14 923 - 5075 - Attention: Reservations Office, or write San Francisco Hilton a Street, P.O. Box 420868, San Francisco, CA 94142-0868 to make your r include your arrival date, departure date, number of people, and the req room {one or two). You must guarantee your reservations with a credit car expiration date. Most major credit cards are accepted. Other nearby hot (through the first week of November) for conference attendees. Hotel Diva The Handlery Kensington Park The King George Hotel Union 440 Geary Street Union Square Hotel Hotel Square San Francisco, CA Hotel 450 Past Street 334 Mason Street 432 Geary SI. 94102 351 Geary Street San Francisco, CA San Francisco, CA San Francisco, 1415) 885 0200 T,I San Francisco, CA 94102 94102-1783 94102 (800) 553-1900 ToI 94102 (415) 788-6400 T,I (415) 781-5050 T,I (415) 397-3000 T,I (415) 885 3268 f" 1415) 781.7800 1,1 (8001 553.1900 1,1 (415) 391-6976 fa, (800) 553-1900 1,1 (415) 781-0269 Fa, 1415) 885.3268 fa' (4151399.1874 fa, Travel - Arrangements for discount airfares within the continental U.S. have been made on United Airlines for registrants, spouses and/or guests. Our official travel agency, Travel Fair, has guaran- teed to provide the lowest available fare at the time your ticket is issued less 0 special discount of 5% off any published fare and 10% off any unrestricted Full coach fare. Collective purchasing will make a difference and we appreciate your support in working with Travel Fair for your conference air arrangements. For reservations and information call Travel Fair at: 800-235-1423 (If colling From inside the US) {415}-391 1423 (If colling from outside the US) (415)-391-5407 Fox (415)-495-5315 Telex Call between 9 AM and 5 PM Pacific Time and ask for Liz Spander, conference specialist. Continuing Education Credits (C E Us) HEALTH EDUCATORS' CEUs hove been approved for specified break-out sessions through the Society for Public Health Education (SOPHE). Cost is $3.00 per contact hour for SOPHE members and $4 00 per contact hour for all others, which includes 0 certificate of attendance for 011 approved sessions. A minimum of four contact hours is required, you must sign up for at least two (2) approved sessions. Fees will be collected at the CEU table during conference check in. REGISTERED NURSES. Credit is currently pending through the University of CaliFornia, Berkeley's Extension office, with the CaliFornia Board of Registered Nursing (BRN), for courses specifically noted in this Registration pocket. Reciprocity may be granted to attendees of other states - please check with your state's chapter of the BRN. If approved, administrative fees will be $40 per person. This will create 0 permanent record of all approved sessions attended during the conference. A mini- mum of four contact hours is required. You must sign up for at leasl two {2} approved sessions. A transcript of your record may be obtained at any time for a $5 fee. GENERAL CREDIT for specified courses is also pending, and will likely be offered through the UC Berkeley's Extension office. If approved, administrative fees will be $40 per person. This will create o permanent record of all approved sessions attended during the conference. A minimum of four contact hours is required. You must sign up for at least two (2) approved sessions. A transcript of your record may be obtained at any time for 0 $5 fee. SOCIAL WORKERS CREDIT is also pending with the California Chapter of the Notional Association of Social Workers (NASW). If approved, administrative fees will be $30 per person, which includes a certificate of attendance for all approved sessions attended during the conference. Reciprocity may be granted to attendees of other states - please check with your stole's chapter of the NASW. If you are interested in credit in any of these areas, please sign up for sessions which slate that credit is being offered or is pending. Special Needs - Child core: A list of local resources will be available From the conference office and on site. Accessibilitv for disabled attendees: The conference is wheelchair accessible. For other accommodations, please see Registration Form and indicate needs. InterDreters: Language interpretation may be provided depending on need and available resources. Please indicate need for interpreters on the Registration Form. ScholarshiDs: A limited number of partial scholarships may be available. Please request in writing and indicate how you would use conference attendance in your community work. ii( /1//:;-3/ if .' tIIf " , , ,~:.~~~, I'll:. / ~,/.~. 71/ :' .. ''';:'. spouse or guest tour options For those of you who would like to accompany conference porticipants and get a taste of the beautiful San Francisco Bay Area, the following tour options have been arronged. Pie note that the "Escape to Alcatraz" tour has an early registration deadline. Tours and offered only to Healthy Cities registrants and their guests. Tickets will not be mailed. pick up your tickets at the tour desk located in the Healthy Cities registration area at th Francisco Hilton Hotel. Riser/Almeida professional guides provide informative and ente commentary on all tours. THE ESSENTIAL CITY TOUR - Four Hours Cost: $ J 9 per person Wednesday, December 8, 8:30 am - 12:30 pm MUIR WOODS/SAUSAUTO - Four Hours Cost: $30 per person Wednesday, December 8, 1 :00 - 5:00 pm or Saturday, December 11, 1 BAYSIDE SHOPPING (Sausalito and S.F plus ferry ride) . Thursday, December 9, 10:00 am - 3:00 pm ESCAPE TO ALCATRAZ - Four Hours Cost: $27 per person Thursday, December 9, 9-00 am - 1 :00 pm or Saturday, Decembe Special Registration Deadline: November 12 CHINATOWN WALKING TOUR & DIM SUM LUNCHEON - Four Hours Cost: $31 per person (includes lunch) Friday, December 10, 9:30 am - 1 :30 pm A DAY IN THE WINE COUNTRY - Eight Hours Cost: $70 per person (includes lunch) Friday, December 10,9:00 am - 5,00 pm PA YMENT POLICY: Full payment for each requested tour must be received by November 19, 1993, to confirm your reservation. Escape to Alcatraz payment must be received by November 12. Only personal check or money orders in US dollars written on a US bank can be accepted. Payment must be accompanied by your name, address, phone number and a list of all tours being paid for. Requests for refunds must be received 10 days prior to the tour To cancel, call (415) 391-1446, fax (415) 391-5407, or write c/o the address noted below. A minimum of 40 per- sons per motorcoach is required for operation of tours. Full refunds will be issued if the minimum number of registrants is not met. We're sorry, but motorcoaches are not handicapped equipped. Riser/Almeida Associates, Inc. 250 Montgomery Street, Sixth Floor, San Francisco, CA 94104 ATTN, IHCC -------- --------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --.------ tour reservation form: NAME STREET ADDRESS OR P.O BOX CITY 5T ATE/PROVINCE ZIP CODE COUNTRY PHONE OR FAX: (INCLUDE COUNTRY AND AREA CODES) select tours on bock of form and return to: Riser/Almeida Associates, Inc. 250 Montgomery Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 ATTN, IHCC itt 1--/ b -JJ ----r---- , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , -------------T-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- : tour selection , , , , , , , post-conference optional tours Disneyland: 3 days and 2 nights in Disneyland $230 per person. San Diego: 4 days and 3 nights in Son Diego $250 per person. Cabo San Lucas, Mexico: 5 days and 4 nights on the beautiful warm beaches of Cabo San Lucas, $574 per person. Maui, Hawaii: 5 days ond 4 nights on the beautiful beaches of Maui, $620 per person. All trips include round trip airfare from Son Francisco and are based on double hotel room occupancy. These trips must be booked in advance and have limited availability. Trips can be extended and modified at additional cost. Call Liz Spander at Travel Fair for more information: (800) 235-1423 1415) 391-1423 1415) 391-5407 FAX ,\ J J I, '~ni$i~: T II' I , WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 8 Essential City Tour Tickets@ $19 each - $ Muir Woods/Sausalito Tickets @ $30 each = $ ---- THURSDAY, DECEMBER 9 Escape to Alcatraz Tickets @ $27 each"" $ Bayside Shopping Tickets @ $23 each = $ FRIDAY, DECEMBER 10 Wine Country Tour Tickets @ $70 each = $ Chinatown Tour Tickets @ $31 each = $ SATURDAY, DECEMBER 11 Escape to Alcatraz Tickets @ $27 each = $ Muir Woods/Sausalito Tickets @ $30 each"" $ -- ..--- TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED $ Only personal check or money orders in US dollars written on 0 US bonk con be accepted. Please make checks payable to Riser/Almeida Associates, Inc. Payment must be accompanied by the Tour Reservation Form. ,. zJb ~]' registration form INTERNATIONAL HEALTHY CITIES AND COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE DECEMBER 7-11,1993 HILTON HOTEL, SAN FRANCISCO, CA USA ~ Badge Information (please pdnt log;blyl , I '1~ame (Firsl/MI/Last or Surname) _______m_ , , : Organization/Affiliation , , : City State Country , , : mailing address: , Street/P .0. Box City State Zip Country Phone FAX E Mail Will a nonregistered spouse or guest be accompanying you to San Francisco? DYes n No Spouse or Guest's Name Please make reservations for guest tours on the optional tour form. Some social events may be able to accomodate additional guests on a first come first serve basis. Organization Type (please mark all that apply) o us n Government U Corporate [J Other D International D Association n Consulting o NGO D Foundation D Volunteer (Please describe) ~ worksessions requested: ~ Please list the worksessions you prefer to attend for each breakout time slot. Worksessions are designed to be participatory and space is limited. Indicate worksession numbers below. First Choice Second Choice Wednesday Dec 8, 2,00 - 4,00 ----------- Thursday Dec 9, 10,30 - 12,30 ---------- Thursday Dec 9, 2,00 - 4,00 Friday Dec 10, 9,30 - 11.30 Saturday Dec 11, 8,30 10,30 m__ If available, I plan to apply for CEU credits in the following areas: HE 0 RN 0 GEND ~ J/b/];- SWD . other ways to participate r: poster session: Please provide the title of your poster as you wont it listed in the program agenda. Also, list any other co-presenters or authors. ------ -- - ----------------------..--- displays: I will send materials for the Gallery o I will bring a flag from my country D To request an Exhibitor's Prospectus, please call the Conference Office, 15101540-2412", FAX. (5101655-2971 special needs: If you have a disability and need special accommodations please briefly describe your need (by November 19, 1993} for example ASL interpreter, large print materials, etc. ------------ ----..- ----- If you need language interpretation please indicate language registration fees: Indicate Amounts Registration fee already paid $ ENCLOSED FEES BY NOV 19 AFTER NOV 19 --------- 4 Day Conference $325 $375 $ ----.----- Urban Mediation Seminar T ue,doy, IDee 7, 1993) $25 $25 $ -----.----- ETM Seminar T ue,doy, IDec 7, 19~___ $75 $100 $ total $ I am including a donation to help fund conference participation $ --.---- -----.- total enclosed --...--.--.-- ------" thank you very much II Payment D Check Enclosed (US Dollars made payable to Western Consortium for Public Health) D Visa 0 Mastercard 0 American Express Credit Card Number Expiration Date Card Holder~~_~~~nature Phone -....----- -------.- OFFICE USE ONLY Reg. No. Check No. Total Rc' d Dale Rc' d Initials three ways to register: PHONE, {4151 380-0414 FAX. {4151 380-8999 MAIL: International Healthy Cities and Communities Conference c/o ERS, 655 Redwood Hwy, Ste 309, Mill Volley, CA 94941, USA Refunds will be granted, less a 20% processing fee if written requests are postmarked by November 19, 1993. t/b~;J&, ---~ .., --,1, ~/ "" , w~< ~ T" . ~<;- "" 'r . I)"~ ". .).-':. '.\ H _~~.' ,.1"'. - -:.'<t~,,,.:, - ;"-~~~:;: .: :-,1. ,f..~. ..,'- " . ~ . " . . o . . :I: . . .. .. n ~ . . . . .. n o 3 3 c . ~ . . n . . - . . . " l' ... .. o o :I: . . ... ~ " . . ,. ... c ~ . .!" m 3 . " .. < - l' n I> .. .. .. o .. z!b /)7 ~ _ :e n ~ .. .. m 0 o . 0 . .. - . .. 0 "0 .. 0 .. c . " - .. .. 0 .. .. .. n . . . 0 " . .. 0 :I: . 0 . . . 0 c.> . ~ . " ':' ~ :; ~ .. c 3 , \ <n )> ri=:; cO ~~ 0e>Z :::jZ""'\J-o)>~ ,,)::0;;:: '**'-0 VJN ""'IJ ;30~ ~~O V1, ~ (5 ~ " Z )> CALIFORNIA HEALTHY CITIES ACIDEVEMENT AWARDS 1993 Anaheim's Pollution Prevention Program Supports Local Economy The City of Anaheim convened a partnership among the Public Utilities and Fire Departments and representatives of local businesses to implement cost-effective environmental management strategies while supporting economic viability. Implemented in 1991, the program assisted small business in evaluating waste streams subject to regulation; shared source reduction and waste minimization strategies; provided information on recycling, treatment, disposal, and regulatory requirements; identified sources of fmancial assistance; and investigated economical options for hazardous waste disposal. Services were offered at no cost and, within the first year, 500 businesses attended workshops and 1,300 businesses were reached through a quarterly newsletter. The program has fostered a climate of cooperation between business and government; decreased improper disposal of hazardous waste; protected local ground water; decreased environmental degradation; and supported an important section of the local job market. Chula Vista Coordinates Services to Provide Safety Net for Seniors The City of Chula Vista established Project Care during a 1992 celebration of "Older American's Month". Realizing that no single agency could afford to enhance service levels to homebound or isolated seniors without increased resources, participating agencies and organizations created a partnership to package existing programs, develop new ones, and form a network of human care providers. Combined human service activities included Gatekeeper, Postal Alert, RUOK?, Vial of Life, Minor Home Repairs, and Senior Friends. During the first year of operation the project reached more than 500 seniors. Anticipated outreach during the project's second year has been estimated at more than 50 seniors per month. Highland Combines Resources to Reverse Crime, Improve Community Infrastructure The City of Highland initiated the Ward/Cunningham Neighborhood Revitalization Program in 1991 in response to increased crime, gang activity, and deteriorated housing stock. A resident survey noted that 75 percent would move out of the neighborhood if they could. With few resources, the City created a multi-pronged systematic strategy including "Community-Oriented Problem Solving" by the Police Department; a multi-agency "Highland Family Preservation Project Team"; a property manager's manual to screen and select tenants more carefully; tough building inspections and code enforcement; and Community Development Block Grant funds for repaving streets and employing a Neighborhood Revitalization Coordinator. By 1993, another resident survey indicated that perceptions of quality of life had increased by 50 percent; regard for neighborhood schools had increased by 23 percent; and feelings of safety when out alone in daylight hours increased by 17 percent. i/h '59 South Gate Commission's Programs Make A Difference for Youth and Families The City of South Gate fonned the "Commission for South Gate Youth" following a 1989 community forum in which 300 residents voiced concern over gangs, drugs, graffiti and youth- related incidences of crime. Representatives from small business, industry, ministry, parents, and school personnel were selected by the Commission's Advisor -- the Chief of Police -- and eight sub-committees were established to address specific issues such as child safety, at-risk youth, parents, fund raising, marketing, business and industry, and churches. As a result of program activities and community awareness, the number of local gangs decreased from 17 to 8; local gang membership decreased from approximately 1,000 to about 300; juvenile arrests for drug-related activity decreased from 70 to 35; and the senior high school recorded the highest seat attendance in the Los Angeles Unified School District and a drop-out rate of under 7 percent. The junior high school, the nation's largest, placed in the top 2 percent of District seat attendance and recorded a drop-out rate of below 2 percent. South Lake Tahoe City Leadership Integrates Services for Healthier Living The City of South Lake Tahoe fonned the Tahoe Prevention Network in 1990 as a collaborative effort to solve community problems related to alcohol and drug abuse, community health, and economic development. Based on a cabinet structure of 33 community and city representatives, the Network improved service delivery to residents, avoided duplication of services, reduced costs, and improved the quality of services. Eight projects, targeting low income and minority populations and involving over 565 community members, leveraged over $3.2 million in grants and endowments. Activities included the Tahoe Earthship project, building a community structure from recycled materials; First Night, an alcohol and drug free New Years Eve celebration; Healthy Start, improving academic perfonnance and access to community social services; Project LEARN, reducing and preventing child abuse and neglect; Family Advocate, improving access to health care, preventing substance abuse and improving employment opportunities; Sober Grad Party, providing an alcohol free graduation party for high school seniors; Boys and Girls Club, increasing opportunities for youth to participate in educational and recreational activities; and Red Ribbon Week, promoting healthy living and substance prevention activities. . . I-j b ~ LjtJ 1992 Half Moon Bay's Multi-Agency Effort Creates Complete Access Trail The City of Half Moon Bay dedicated the first phase of its Coastside Trail Project on October 4, 1992, celebrating a four year cooperative effort by residents and three levels of government. The 2.5 mile ribbon of all-weather, special paving material links north and central Half Moon Bay and the downtown, providing access to all segments of the population and encouraging exercise and recreation as well as providing alternative transportation linkages. Prior to construction of the trail, it was impossible for the frail, the very young, or the physically disabled to enjoy the bluffs along the length of the coastline except from a parking lot. In addition, by acting as the developer and the project manager, the City coordinated construction and maintenance agreements which resulted in consistency of design and economy of scale. San Clemente Pilots Neighborhood Revitalization Program The City of San Clemente initiated the Neighborhood Pride Program in response to the community's concern over the deterioration of housing, abandoned vehicles and an increase in crime within the center city. City Council directed the creation of a task force and the designation of a five-block area which was not only one of high density but also the most historic. Program activities included the mailing of 600 bilingual brochures informing residents of goals and services; 7 public meetings to identify and respond to residents' concerns; inspection of 203 properties and 429 dwelling units by code enforcement personnel, with 72 violations subsequently corrected by the property owner; donations from local banks for paint including money and vouchers, resulting in 20 additional property improvements; $100,000 in grants and gas tax monies to repair a street, build a sidewalk, and landscape a barren slope; and the collection of 14 tons of trash on Clean-Up Day. Addressing both human needs and property deterioration, the program was so successful that it was extended into 3 additional target areas encompassing 52 streets, 1,212 properties and 3,584 dwelling units. San Fernando Reclaims a Park from Gangs and Empowers Community The City of San Fernando involved residents, private enterprise and City staff for the rebirth of Las Palmas Park in 1990. Located in a crowded area of tiny, single-family homes, Las Palmas Park was once a place for neighborhood children to play and adults to socialize. But more recently, the park had become a battleground for two warring gangs, each laying claim to a patch of land that once belonged to the public. The mayor and city council members adopted a novel ordinance prohibiting active members of criminal street gangs from entering the park; extended park employees' hours to organize more positive activities; heightened police presence; removed gang graffiti; and supported community efforts in restoring the park as a community asset. ""',- 'Ih-'i . 101l~ COMMENDING CHULA VISTA CITY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR COMMITMENT IN SUPPORTING AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO 'i3 WHEREAS, AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO '93 was supported by an overwhelming number of Chula VIsta City empIoyMS and elected oIIici"ls who gave generously from their hear1s to support two City employee walkers: Berlin Bosworth and Alice Espinoza; and WHEREAS, Bertin Bosworth, Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency, raised $8,400 in contributions over a two-year period; and WHEREAS, the generous contributions by City employees win help fund organizations which provide nee III try services to enhance and enrich the personal dignity and quality of Iif8 lor those living with and infected with the HIV virus: NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor of the City of Chula VISta, Caiifomia do hereby COMMEND CHULA VISTA CITY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR COMMITMENT IN SUPPORTING AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO 'i3. FURTHER, it is appropriate that special acknowtedgement be made to BerIn Bosworth and Alice espinoza for their dedication and commitment in thII critIcIII endeaYor. :Datu;{ tkis2!Jfty !lit; .. ~t /9~ ?C"" Il..~ UJttyor!1 tlie Ci!J 5 Oiura CVista 'Ie -) COMMENDING CMULA VISTA CITY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR COIIMITMENT IN SUPPORTING AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO '83 WHEREAS, AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO '93 _ 8UppOI1ed by ." DY8I'WheIming runber 01 ChuIa VISta CIty empIoy_ end eIec:ted oIIicIaIs who gave generously from their '-1s to support two City employee walkers: Bertin Bo8woI1h end Alice Espinoza; and WHEREAS, Alice EspInoza, raised CIII'8I' $1,000 In contributions; and WHEREAS, the gen8I OUS contributions by CIty employees wID help fund organizations which provide necun'Y ..w:es to enhance end enrich the personal clgnlty end quality ollie for those IvIng with end InI8CI8d with the IW virus: NOW, THEREFORE, I, TIM NADER, Mayor 01 the CIty 01 ChuIa VISta, CalIfornia do hereby COMMEND CHULA VISTA CITY EMPLOYEES FOR THEIR COMMITMENT IN SUPPORTING AIDS WALK SAN DIEGO '83. FURTHER, it is appropriate that special ac:knawIedgemen be made to Berin Bo8woI1h and Alice Espinoza for their dedication and commitment In this atticaI endeavor. :Daterf tkis.2!!ary; 5'1- ,- ...&{ 19.1L ~/1~~ (J)tttYor!!f tlie ('If!!f Cltura 'Vt5ta. 1-/c-~ November 4, 1993 FROM: The Honorable Mayor and City COU~il John D. Goss, City Manage~\13~/?~ City Council Meeting of November 9, 1993 TO: SUBJECT: This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, November 9, 1993. Comments regarding the written Communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from FLOATPORT seeking the Council to ask its SANDAG representatives to request that a study be done on the feasibility of FLOATPORT as an option for San Diego's new airport. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FORWARDED TO THE PORT DISTRICT. 5b. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT LINDA WILSON'S RESIGNATION FROM THE LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THAT THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY. JDG:mab 10-30-93 13:24 ASYMCA RECEIVED 508 P01 00 rn ~ ~ ;U.~ rn100 I {.~" '. CITY ~J~.~!L CrFJ.':.:S CHULA v;STA. CA '93 tI)V -1 P3 :30 iVYHULA "'iSH, Joseph F_ 11.21')', P'r(~M,k,,' Donald. Inll1.o;, Co-Cbat'''j .' ... I r ;.: lIo-anI Bloud, C,j.C'bl-lmnatl John Nkhc:~')n, ,\i"t,'rl~, SOl j ICE FlO...KIl4 ,J..."'lnp.......' .!/PI.O,,"1', Ii'lt.. --M",,,,,_I~Rr October 30, 1993 Chula Vieta City Council 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Ladies and Gentlemen: Float Incorporated is the originator of FLOATPORT - the proposal to locate San Diego's airport three miles off the tip of Point Lorna. We would like to present the idea to the City Council. We are seeking to have the Council ask its San Diego Area Governments (SANDA G) representative to request that a study be done on the feasibility of FLOATPORT as an option for San Diego's new airport. We have reason to believe that the FAA would be happy to fund such a request. Please echedule us on the City Council"s agenda at Your earliest convenience. Please send us the names and mailing addresses of the Council members and we will provide an information package for each of them so that they make an informed decision on our request. Thank you very much for this opportunity. ~ (619) 233-4443 , t:.~. - Hc~ /~/! Cc . _ I.;;. (') '-~l\":;jV'4'\;'-'" ~ c:::;~ d7? . vY fii,..ij iJ !j ~~~~ (/ -) LJa.-n- (I'~~ ~-'/ 16(){) Ilot..1 Cirdr.' Nortb 'illil(' -:'::', ~;'!I' f)1(",I:\I. (..llLrOIlIl,~ 9:!10H '11-:1. (Ii~)l.!~~ ~).lj1 C" hl~.I, ~;.:S-+'HJ, FAX (H'JI2<)<')-~7~ CQjtAN~UI~~CA"j>~QNS <~~ //1/~)> r' / / RECEIVED ., '93 MJY -1 P 3 :47 September 28, 1993 CITY OF CHULA vlSl A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE TO: Mayor Tim Nader, Chula Vista City Council FROM: Linda Wilson, Trustee Library Board RE: Resignation Dear Mayor Nader and Members of the Council: It is with regret that I tender my resignation as Trustee on the Chula Vista Library Board, effective December 3l,199J. A recent job promotion has greatly increased my work responsibility and makes it necessary to adjust my schedule to allow for this. I would like to thank the Mayor, City Council, the Chula Vista Library management staff, and my fellow Board members for giving me the rewarding opportunity to serve as a Trustee. Sincerely, ~ c, !J~ Linda C. Wilson Cc' :?i,/~(7) Ji-~~ WRITTEN COMMUNICATiONS ~ ;!9/'1] A-I COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ ~q;; Meeting Date~ /1 J 'J.J ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Amendment to the Municipal Code, PCA-94-01 - Consideration of an amendment to Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.14.050A to allow applicants for planning permits to bypass the Zoning Administrator and have their applications considered by the City Planning Commission in public hear~O~ity Initiated <;p'<' Ordinance ;<575 ~,,'glCrnding Section 19.14.050A of the Chula Vista Municipal Code ~~rw applicants for planning permits to bypass Zoning Adminis~ 'to expedite consideration by the Planning Commission ._",,'V \' _'ivv\. ~.--?' .,;/ , SUBMITTED BY: Director;rr Planning / (It. REVIEWED BY: City Manager (pIt- /.~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.1U f,J) Council Referral No. 2726 In February, the City Council requested staff ~veral permit streamlining actions which had been referred to staff for evaluation. One of the items directed~ Council was to "prepare a draft ordinance which would provide an applicant with th~~ypass th: *- ~onin&. Administrator ~d take applications directly to the Planning Commission". - - The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the amendment is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061 (b3) of the CEQA Guidelines. . RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the ordinance amending Section 19.14.050A of the Municipal Code. BOARDS/COM~NS RECOMMENDATION: On October 13, 1993, the Planning Commission vo~o recommend that Council enact the amendment. DISCUSSION: Section 19.14.030 of the Municipal Code allows the Zoning Administrator to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve certain types of Conditional Use Permits, variances, site plan and architectural approvals, zoning permits, and home occupation permits. Section 19.14.040 of the Municipal Code further provides that "the zoning administrator may, at hislher option, refer any of the matters on which he/she is authorized to rule andlor issue a permit to the planning commission for review. In such cases, a public hearing as provided herein shall be mandatory." ~~-/ ~? Page 2, Item I Meeting Date /93 II~ Council requested staff to prepare a Code amendment which would provide that~ojecC) a licant may also request that action by the Zonin Administrator be w. ,an t the matter be sche u e or pu IC earing be ore e Planning Commission. This would allow an ave the matter j!cheduled for a public hearing befQre the p[aning Commission ~ immediately \!pon filing of an apQ.licatioJ;!, rather than requiring an action by the Zoning rim ator and appeal of that action to the Planning Commission. An applicant may wish f~ to select this option if he or she is aware of significant public controversy regarding a proposal, or is aware of conditions which may be imposed by the Zoning Administrator which are unacceptable, based on preliminary input from City staff. By taking this approach, a public hearing before the Planning Commission could be scheduled more quickly than if the applicant were required to await action by the Zoning Administrator and file an appeal of that action. The proposed amendment to Section 19.14.050.A would read as follows: . c~~ '* The Zoning Administrator may, at hislher option, refer any of the matters on which he/she is authorized to rule and/or issue a permit to the planning commission for review. In addition a Droiect aDDlicant mav reauest that anv such matter be referred directlv to the PlamIing Commission for action. In such cases, a public hearing as provided herein shall be mandatory. It should be noted that the Planning Department staff already offers project applicants the option of having these types of matters referred directly to the Planning Commission. However, the proposed Municipal Code amendment would remove any ambiguity regarding the right of an applicant to request such a referral, and would ensure that all applicants are aware of this option at the earliest point in the process. FISCAL IMP ACT: The amendme costs. . WPC F:lhomclplanning\138S.93 . j;i--;2: ~ ~;L.. ~\.o~ Q~/ ~:v AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF~ULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION 19.14.050A ~~qrgE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALL~? APPLICANTS FOR PLANNING PERMIT~~ 'BYPASS ZONING ADMINISTRATOR HE G TO EX~EDITE CONSIDERATION BY P G COMMISSION ORDINANCE NO. 0<5'75 SECTION I: That section 19.14.050A of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: Sec. 19.14.050 Public Hearing-Mandatory When. A. The zoning administrator may, at ~his option, refer any of the matters on which she/he is authorized to rule and/or issue a permit to the planning commission for review. In addition. a proiect applicant mav reauest that anv such matter be referred directly to the Plannina Commission for action. In such cases, a public hearing as provided herein shall be mandatory. SECTION II: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its doption. Robert A. Leiter, Director of Planning ( ~ Bruce M. Attorney aJ n l~~/ Presented by C:1ot\1914050 INFORMATION PACKET SCANNED AT FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE ON: 1/-0(- 93 ~.,- 3 ~ t.~'f RESOLUTION NO. PCA-94-01 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO TIIE CITY COUNCIL AN AMENDMENT TO CVMC SECTION 19.14.030 A. TO ALLOW APPLICANTS FOR PLANNING PERMITS TO BYPASS THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND HAVE TIIEIR APPLICA TlONS CONSIDERED DIRECTLY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN A PUBLIC HEARING - CITY INIT1A TED WHEREAS, Section 19.14.030 of the Municipal Code allows the Zoning Administrator to approve, disapprove, or conditionally approve certain types of Conditional Use Pennits, variances, site plan and architectural approvals, zoning pemUts, and home occupation pennits, and WHEREAS, in February 1992 the City Council directed staff to prepare a draft ordinance amendment to CVMC Section 19.14.050 A to allow applicants for planning pennits to bypass the Zoning Administrator and have their applications considered directly by the Planning Commission, and WHEREAS, the proposed code amendment would provide applicants with the option to request that a project be scheduled for a public hearing before the Planning Conunission immediately upon filing a planning pennit application, rather than requiring an action by the Zoning Administrator and appeal of that action to the Planning Commission, thus expediting project processing, and WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days prior to the hearing, and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., October 13, 1993, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the amendment is exempt from environmental review under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT FROM THE FACTS PRESENTED AT TIIE HEARING, TIIE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council adopt the proposed Municipal Code amendment modifying the planning permit processing procedures in accordance with the attached draft City Council Ordinance. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council. ~~-~ PASSED AND APPROVED BY TIm PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of October, 1993 by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Conumssioners Fuller, Martin, Moot, Ray, Salas, Tarantino, Tuchscher NOES: ABSENT: (] Thomas A. Martin, Chainnan ATTEST: ~_~ ;2~lu~ Nancy Ripl ,Secre U WPC F~OMN'LANNING\l345.93 ).34. ~~t- PC Minutes -23- October 13, 1993 Excemt from 10/13/93 Plannin!! Commission Minutes ITEM 5. PUBUC HEARING: PCA-94-01: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.14.050A TO ALLOW APPUCANTS FOP PLANNING PERMITS TO BYPASS THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AND HAVE THEIR APPUCATIONS CONSIDERED DIRECTLY BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION IN PUBUC HEARING Principal Planner Griffm said this was mainly a housekeeping amendment which would formalize what was already being done as a matter of policy. MSUC (Ray/Fuller) 7-0 to adopt PCA-94-01 recommending that the City Council amend Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.14.050A to allow applicants for planning permits to bypass the Zoning Administrator and have their applications considered directly by the Planning Conunission in public hearing. JJ--7 tt- ~ ? THIS PAGE BlANK . . ~~-r CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT SUBMITTED BY: _ !~/1 7 Meeting Date 111 2 3- II/;/?;J PUBLIC HEARING: REGARDING THE PROPOSED DISSOLUTION OF THE MONTGOMERY .~ING COMMITTEE AND SEATING OF THE REMAII:\~ MEMBERS ON THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPME~ {1.R'OJECT AREA COMMmEE .).5'?~ !(.~ ORDINANCE . REP~GN'G SECTION 2.48.200 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPA~~~6DE THEREBY DISSOLVING THE MONTGOMERY ~NNING COMMmEE C;,~(j -<} /J Director of Planning /@fL- <) Community Development Director (. . City Manager {, ~ / G },J\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes NoXJ ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The City of Chula Vista Economic Development Commission was charged with making recommendations for streamlining the development permit process. The EDC, in their final report adopted by the City Council on October 6, 1992, recommended that the project review authority of the Montgomery Planning Committee (MPC) be restricted to legislative changes to the Montgomery Specific Plan, and then review their authority in the future to assess the desireability of discontinuing the MPC altogether. The City Council did not accept this recommendation (#17) and moved to appoint a two-member Council Subcommittee for the purpose of reviewing the "forming ordinances", and developing a consensus on this item, and another related recommendation (#16) regarding the future role and function of the Redevelopment Project Area Committees. To this end, the Redevelopment Agency Board revised the role and function of the Project Area Committees on March 16, 1993, to restrict their review of projects to only those that require discretionary land use approvals. Upon completion of that issue, it was appropriate to proceed with the MPC item. The Council Subcommittee was unable to reach a consensus on the disposition of the MPC and therefore, requested that staff bring the item to Council for further direction. The matter was heard on August 17, 1993, at which time the Council voted 3-2-0 to direct staff to dissolve the Montgomery Planning Committee and to determine the appropriate process for seating the remaining members of the MPC on the Southwest Project Area Committee (SWRPAC). The final staff report from the August 17 meeting is attached as Exhibit B which provides more extensive background information. ~7-/ Page 2, Item~ 7 Meeting Date ~ I/o/Y;J RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the Ordinance which repeals Section 2.48.200 of the Municipal Code thereby dissolving the Montgomery Planning Committee, and that it be placed on the first reading. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: This item was presented at a Joint Special Meeting of the Southwest Project Area Committee and the Montgomery Planning Committee on October 18. Due to a lack of a quorum for both committees, no formal action was taken. However, discussion of the item did take place as reflected in the draft minutes attached as Exhibit A. To briefly sumrilarize, MPC member Scheurer voiced his opposition to the proposed dissolution, but later said that he would have agreed to serve on the SWP AC if he were not moving to Nevada within the next month. MPC member Platt was generally supportive of the dissolution and would agree to serve on the SWRPAC because of the previous action taken by the Council. SWRPAC Chair Brown was not supportive, nor was Dr. A.S. McFarlin who is a member of both committees. The overall thrust of their opposition (as was Member Scheurer's) was based on the fact that approximately 60% of the Montgomery area is not covered by the SWRPAC, and therefore, they felt that that area would not be adequately represented because no one on the Planning Commission lives in the area. Additionally, there were concerns that the current authority and responsibility of the SWRPAC is significantly less than that of the MPC. DISCUSSION: As indicated previously, Exhibit B is the fmal staff report to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency for the August 17, 1993, meeting. After discussion of the options outlined in the report, the Council voted in favor of Option 2 to dissolve the MPC, and then if possible, seat the remaining members on the SWRPAC. Although Council took this action, this Public Hearing is still required pursuant to the requirement in Section 2.48 that a public hearing is necessary to amend or repeal this section. In the event that the recommended action is taken, MPC member Platt can be seated on the SWRPAC through a simple majority vote of the existing members (as noted above, MPC member McFarlin is already a member of the SWRPAC). Staff would present this proposal at the planned Special Meeting of the SWRP AC on November 15 based upon the Council direction of August 17. This would leave two vacancies on the SWRPAC. The overall purpose of this EDC item is to help streamline the development permit process by not requiring that an applicant appear before both the MPC and the SWRPAC. The MPC has served its original purpose of providing input for the planning transition process of the Montgomery community into the City after its annexation from the County in 1986. All applicable "Montgomery" area projects that are not located within the Southwest Project Area would be processed through the Planning Commission and City Council. . FISCAL IMPACT: Undetermined, although this streamlining recommendation was proposed in order to eliminate the staff time and costs associated with staffmg the committee. C:\WPSl IRA YNESIREPORTSIMPCDlSSO.113 ~ 7-c2- . I ~n rJ3~' ORDINANCE NO. cJJ I' ~ ,,0<<. - \>-v ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCn.. OF THE CITY..P~HULA VISTA lmPEALING SECTION 2.48.200 OF THE C~~TA MUNICIPAL CODE THEREBY DISSOLVING THE M~~MERY PLANNING COMMITrnE ~~ C:J<vd;j WHEREAS, the Cit} Council of the City of Chula Vista, in response to a permit streamlining recommendation of the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission, appointed a two-member Council Subcommittee on October 6, 1992, for the purpose of reviewing the "forming ordinances" and developing a consensus regarding the future disposition of the Montgomery Planning Committee; and, WHEREAS, the Council Subcommittee was unable to reach consensus and requested that staff prepare a report outlining the advantages and disadvantages for each of four options described by the Subcommittee; and, WHEREAS, the City Council voted in favor of Option 2 in the August 17, 1993, staff report thereby directing staff to dissolve the Montgomery Planning Committee and determining the process by which the remaining members of the Montgomery Planning Committee could be seated on the Southwest Project Area Committee; and, WHEREAS, the City Council set and duly noticed the public hearing on November 2, 1993, for the purpose of repealing Section 2.48.200 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to effectuate the Council direction of August 17, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as was advertised, namely 4:00 p.m. on November 2, 1993, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was hereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCn.. OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby fmd, order, determine and resolve that Section 2.48.200 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is repealed thereby dissolving the Montgomery Planning Committee. /.7 AP~-R9VED A~ )0 F i/~f~ Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney PRESENTED BY: Robert A. Leiter PI~nning Director C:\WP51\BAYNESIDOCUMEN1\MPCDISSO.ORD INFORMATION PACKET SCANNED AT FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE ON: 1/-:;'-93 $'~ ?J 7-1 ~'"- \~ - ~/ MINlTI'ES OF A JOINT MEETING OF TIm CI1Y COUNCIV REDEVELOPMrNr AGENCY OF TIm CI1Y OF oruu. VISTA Tuesday, August 17, 1993 ]0:54 p.m. Council Chambers Public Services Building , CALL TO ORDER ]. ROU. CALL: PRESENT: Council/Agency Members Fox, Horton, Moore, Rindone, and Mayor/Chairman Nader. ' John.D. Goss, City ManagerlDirector; Bruce M. Boogaard, City/Agency Anorney; and Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk ALSO PRESENT: 2. APPROVAL OF MINlTTES: MSUC O:OX/RINDONE) to approve the July 27, ]993 minutes. CONSENT CALENDAR None submitted. PUBUC HE.ARJNGS AND RELATED RESOLtmONS AND ORDINANCES None submitted. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS There were none. ACTION ITEMS 3. COUNCIL/AGENCY REPORT FU'IURE ROLE OF 1HE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE AND 1HE POSSIBLE MERGER OF 1HE MPC WITH 1HE SOU'l1iWEST PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE PURSUANT TO oruI..A VISTA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC) PERMIT 5I1lEAMIJNlNG RECOMMENDATION NUMBER 17. The Chula Vista EDC established a subcommittee to develop recommendations to streamline the City's development review process to create a more .user friendly" environment for business development. One of the recommendations (Number] 7) concerned the future role and function of the Montgomery Planning Committee and the possible merger of the MPC with the Southwest Project Area Committee. Staff recommends the Council/Agency discuss the alternatives presented in the report and provide additional direction to staff. (Community Development DirectorlPlanning Director) Continued from the meeting of 6/22/93. Council/Agency member Fox stated he campaigned for the annexation of Montgomery' into the City of Chula Vista. He had also been elected to serve on the Montgomery Planning Committee when it did annex. He felt very strongly that Council should support permit streamlining in the City. However, he did not feel that Council should be supporting streamlining in every situation, There were cases that called for leaving things - / - , Minutes August 17, 1993 Page 2 . the way they were. He further stated that in the original position papers, no where was it stated that this Committee would sunset. It was implied that the Committee would remain. M (POX) to approve Option 1 to retain Ibe MPC as it was originally established. Motion died (or lack o( a lleCond. Mayor/Chair Nader stated that Mr. Fox had addressed the Montgomery side o( the issue. There was also the Southwestern Project Area Committee side of the issue. He felt that we had an opportuniry to do some streamlining and consolidation without breaking faith with the voters o( Montgomery who voted to annex to the City o( Chula Vista. He supported the concept o( community planning groups. He recommended No. 4 under Exhibit A. This would say that as soon as the three-year period, which State law requires (or the existence o( the Southwest PAC was over the Committee would be (o)ded into the Montgomery Planning Committee. There would then be one combined Committee that would deal with the combined area of the Southwest PAC and the Montgomery Planning area. Council/Agency member Fox stated that after the PAC was terminated. you would have a Montgomery Planning Committee that cou1d conceivably be composed of people who do not live in the area that was annexed into the City. He took the strict view that there was an implied promise to the people of Montgomery that they would have a community planning committee of their own. He felt that although this was a good alternative, it was not what was promised to the people of Montgomery; he was not prepared to water that down. Council/Agency member Moore recommended Option 2 to dissolve the MPC and ask that the existing SWPAC members vote to add the exiting MPC members to its committee. MS (HORTONIRINDONE) to support Option 2 to dissolve the MPC and ask that the exiting SWPAC members vote to add the existing MPC members to its committee. The committee would perform advisory functions to the Redevelopment Agency on Southwest projects only punuant to Agency Resolution 1309. Mayor/Chair Nader felt that the Southwest Project Area Committee did not encompass the entire Montgomery area, there would be areas of the Montgomery community that would be without representation. Regardless of what the minutes reflect. there were representations made that there would be planning representation following annexation. He suggested that the Attorney look at whether the community was entitled to some say in the dissolution of a committee. SUBS1Tl1JTE MOTION: MS (NADERlFOX) to dissolve the Southwest Project Area Committee and merge it into one Southwest Community Planning Committee at the end o( Ibe year. Substitute motion failed 2-3 (Horton. Moore, Rindone voting no). VOTE ON MAIN MOTION: Approved 3-2 (Foz, Nader voting no). Council/Agency member Moore stated he would like to see cOlTespondence sent over the Mayor's signature to both Committees asking the three members to accept appointment or election to the Southwest Project Area Committee and asking Southwest to review with staff the legal process and use those three to fill the vacancies if we can do so within legal restrictions. Mayor/Chair Nader asked for staff's assistance in preparing a letter along those lines to assure that it complied with any legal restrictions. -{}.- Minutes August 17, 1993 Page 3 OTHER BUSINFSS 4. 01Y MANAGER'SlDlREcrOR'S REPORTCS): There were none. S. MAYOR'S/CHAJRMAN'S REPORTCS): There were none. 6. COUNC!LIAGENCY MEMBER'S COMMENTS: There were none. *.... Agency/City Anorney Boogaard requested that an urgency finding be made to go into closed session for the purpose of giving instructions to negotiators in regard to modifying the terms and conditions for the disposition of a development agreement on the auto park property. MSC (NADERlRINDONE) to make the urgency finding requested by the Agency/City Attorney. Motion earned 4-0-1 (Honon absent). .. .. .. .. .. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 11:16 p.m. to the regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on Tuesday, September 7, 1993 at 4:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council Meeting. Respectfully submined, Beverly A Authelet, CMC City Clerk 3~ UNOFFICIAL MINUTES EXCERPT SPECIAL JOINT MEETING SOUTHWEST PROJECT AREA COMMITIEE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMIITEE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT A October 18, 1993 4:30 p.m. Conference Room I Public Services Building CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL The meeting was calJed to order at 4:48 p.m. There being no quorum, it was agreed that items would be discussed with no action taken including approval of the minutes. Minutes were tabled to the next meeting. Southwest Project Area: PRESENT: Chair Brown, Members McFarlin, Jones, LaGuardia, ABSENT: Members CampbelJ and Olalde Montgomery Planning Committee: PRESENT: Members McFarlin, Scheuer, Platt STAFF: Principal Community Development Specialist Haynes, Associate Planner Herrera-A, Councilman Moore, Recording Secretary Kemp 2. REPORT: On proposed dissolution of the Montgomery Planning Committee and seating of the remaining members on the Southwest Project Area Committee Mr. Haynes explained that in March of this year Council voted to keep the project area committees intact; but to restrict their review authority to those projects that require discretionary land use approval. On August 17, Council voted to dissolve the Montgomery Planning Committee (MPC) with the condition that the existing MPC members be assimilated into the Southwest Project Area Committee (SWRP AC). Formal action has to be conducted through a public hearing which is scheduled for November 2, 1993. Mr. Haynes asked that the members of the MPC individualJy acknowledge their desire to be named to the SWRP AC. Mr. Haynes also noted that there has not been much activity taking place in the Southwest Project Area and stated he anticipates increased activity within the next few months including utilizing the Southwest PAC in formulating recommendations for the proposed Economic Feasibility Study in the area. Discussion ensued with members McFarlin and Brown voicing their concerns that part of the area (the area not represented by the SWRP AC) would not have representation. They noted that the MPC and SWRP AC look at projects from two different aspects (zoning and impacts) and by eliminating the MPC, a piece will be missing. Mr. Haynes responded that Council's direction made it clear that the PAC's are to look at all projects that require discretionary land use approvals. If an applicant wants to bring in a project that is not zoned for the proper use, this will go to the PAC for review. When PAC's review projects, the environmental impacts wilJ be analyzed. If the use is consistent with the zoning in the area, then that project would not go before the PAC. Mr. Herrera-A emphasized that the area would not be left without representation. The Planning Commission represents that area. The only difference would be that the project would not go through the MPC, it would go directly to the Planning Commission. -;/-- Southwest PAC Minutes - 2- October 18, 1993 Mr. Herrera-A also noted that Susan Fuller, a commissioner on the Planning Commission represents the Montgomery area. Members Brown and McFarlin disagreed stating that Ms. Fuller was only involved in Chula Vista "proper" areas. There needs to be an individual on the Planning Commission to voice the concerns of the area. Ms. McFarlin stated she felt that the only group representing the area were those on the MPC. She said that those original members dropped out because they could see the "handwriting on the wall". In response to Councilman Moore's question for clarification, Ms. McFarlin said that they saw the committee was going to be nullified. The committee felt they had no say in w~t was happening in the co~unity. She noted that the MPC had the power to stop certain projects and the SWRP AC does not have that ability. . Ms. McFarlin stated that they are talking about a different group of people, a different population of people that live in the Montgomery area. They do not feel their concerns are being met. Eliminating the MPC leaves them with no representation. Ms. Brown added that putting single individuals on committees does not work because one vote does not do anything. They need to be concerned about the people in their community and in fact, has a responsibility to represent their concerns. She does not care about what is happening in EastLake or elsewhere, she just cares about what is happening in her community. Councilman Moore responded that Council never knew in advance that the MPC was going to be dissolved. They had received a good response from the MPC on various issues and could only recall one time when Council vetoed a recommendation from the MPC (Orange/Palomar intersections). Councilman Moore also stated that no one from that area has been interested in serving on the Planning Commission; Mr. Tony Castro had been approached and had been asked to consider applying for the Planning Commission but had declined. Council was dissolving/merging this committee to cut down on duplicity. Right now applicants have to go through as many as four committees for project review before they go before Council. Ms. McFarlin asked how fast plans were going through since the committee's last meeting in December. Mr. Haynes responded that due to the general economy there have been no applications coming through that would necessitate review by the SWRPAC since last year (December). Mr. Haynes indicated that there have been plenty of calls from brokers etc., bu no applications for CUP's,etc. have been filed that have made it far enough in the process for PAC review Mr. Herrera-A noted that they have had to pass on items for review because of lack of quorums. Councilman Moore also noted that a revitalization project had also been started right after annexation in 1985. The goal was to look at five different communities: Otay, Harborside, Castle Park, Broderick Acres and Woodlawn Park. This is another way to bring the City together. The people in these areas were introduced to other commissioners and staff and were able to deal directly with those departments concerned. Ms. Brown stated that this was a program that the MPC had come up with a program that was similar to the Revitalization Program. They had decided one thing and Council decided another. Councilman Moore responded that Council had met with residents in the five different communities and responded to the needs of those areas based on a formula by using the residential population in the area and census tracts. Councilman Moore noted that Council responds to all the people in the community, not just the MPC and its needs. Mr. Herrera-A stated that the five communities chosen were based on a formula established by Community Development. The community that was selected (Otay Town) was taken because of the single family dwelling unit. Woodlawn Park is being considered and right now Community Development is looking at what community will be next. Member Platt stated that the representation has been his main concern and it looks as if a decision has been made and there is nothing more that can be done. He is in favor of going ahead and merging with the SWRP AC. . Ms. Brown stated they have no choice; DO one is listening. Mr. Herrera- A stated that a final decision has not been made by Council although they did take action to disband the MPC. It does have to go through a formal hearing and at that time Council will make a final decision. -~ Southwest PAC Minutes - 3 - October 18, 1993 In response to Mr. LaGuardia's comment that 60% of Montgomery was represented by the group, Mr. Haynes explained that in terms of land area, the area is represented at 40% with the other 60% being represented by the Planning Commission. At Ms. Brown's request, Mr. Herrera-A brought in maps of the areas represented by the Planning Commission and the Southwest Project Area Committee. Ms. Brown again voiced her concern that 60 % of the Montgomery area would fall under the Planning Commission, who had no representative from their area. She stated that they are not given detailed information as to what is going on in the area. Mr. LaGuardia suggested that she contact staff in Planning and check on what is being filed and what is going on in the area; these are all public documents. They could also look into possibly recruiting someone in real estate to sit on the committee. Ms. Brown responded that she teaches during the day and is involved in many other committees and said that getting this information should not be her responsibility. The City should get the information to them; they should not have to be required to do any type of research. Mr. LaGuardia responded that neighborhoods can organire groups to get the information; it is not necessary to form committees to do this. 7. MEMBERS' COMMENTS a. Member Scheuer stated that this would be his last meeting. He is moving to Nevada next month. Mr. Scheuer thanked Councilman Moore for his help in getting him on the MPC. He thanked the committee for the opportunity to have worked with them. ,,\SOUTHWEST 10-18-V2.MIN -10- f:YHIRIT B JOINT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item .3 Meeting Date W.oSlJI71g5M R~!~~~it2~L~ll2~ REPORT ON THE FUTURE ROLE OF THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE AND THE POSSIBLE MERGER OF THE MPC WITH THE SOUTHWEST PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE PURSUANT TO CHULA VISTA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION PERMIT STREAMLINING RECOMMENDATION #17 C . D I r- c..S , ommumty eve opment lrector Planning Director /ll . City Manager ~~ ~ ~1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes No.xJ SUBMITI'ED BY: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The Chula Vista Economic Development Commission (EDC) established a subcommittee to develop recommendations to streamline the City's development review process in order to create a more "user friendly" environment for business development. One of the twenty-five EDC recommendations (Recommendation #17) concerned the future role and function of the Montgomery Planning Committee (MPC) and the possible merger of the MPC with the Southwest Project Area Committee (SWPAC). A copy of the relevant portion of the EDC report is included for review as Exhibit C. The City Council at the October 6, 1992 meeting, moved to accept the responsibility of reviewing the duties and "forming ordinances" of the MPC and the three (3) Project Area Committees (PACs), and authorized two members of the Council to meet with all of the parties concerned in order to formulate a consensus on these matters. Subsequently, the Agency Members adopted Resolution 1309 on March 16, 1993, approving the revised roles and functions for each of the PACs pursuant to EDC Permit Streamlining Recommendation #14. Based upon the revised roles and functions, this report presents a list of alternatives for the future role of the MPC based on the Council Subcommittee report to staff and included as Exhibit A. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended by the Council subcommittee that the City Council discuss the alternatives presented in the report and provide additional direction to staff. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: EDC Permit Streamlining Recommendation #17 (see Exhibit C), recommended that the review authority of the MPCbe restricted to legislative changes to the Montgomery Specific Plan, and then review their authority in three (3) years to determine the desirability of discontinuing the MPC. In addition, as part of the discussion, it was acknowledged that the City Attorney was currently reviewing the possibility of merging the MPC and the SWPAC which would be dependent upon the ultimate outcome of EDC Recommendation #14 (pACs role and function). -1- Page 2, Item M t. D t R'''''8.~'1'n''1~'''?' ee mg a e.,.,.,u .'''''''/.. ;;J.,..", w............'.-.'.-.,'..w...-..........'...... DISCUSSION: Pursuant to Agency Resolution 1309 (attached as Exhibit B), the Agency Members voted to keep the PACs intact and also provided a clearer definition of their roles and responsibilities. Therefore as a result of that action, the Southwest PAC is to remain in existence beyond its statutorily required three (3) year term pursuant to the California Community Redevelopment Law. That decision affects the discussion of this item by further defining the question of should the two cOmmittees be merged, or if the MPC should remain intact or be dissolved. Attached as Exhibit A is the City Council Subcommittee report. As indicated in the report, the MPC was originally established as a community planning committee to assist in the development of a community planning element of the General Plan. Council action was taken to appoint the top seven (7) vote getters to two (2) year initial terms, with subsequent terms to be filled by appointment of the City Council. Currently, the MPC has only three (3) members, and therefore, cannot functionally take definitive action on items affecting the Montgomery area. The original purpose of the MPC has been fulfilled with the adoption of the Montgomery Specific Plan. As also stated in the Council Subcommittee Report, the Subcommittee was not able to agree on a recommendation for this item. Therefore, as instructed, the following list of alternatives with respective advantages and disadvantages is provided for evaluation and discussion. Option 1: Retain the MPC as it was originally established and take swift action to f1I1 the vacant positions as soon as possible. Keep the SWPAC in its current state pursuant to Agency Resolution 1309. ... Advantal!es: 1. Direct community representation for input on projects and issues that affect the Montgomery Community. 2. MPC has historically been the conduit or vehicle the community has used to address specific Montgomery community concerns to the City Council and City Departments. 3. Maintain the long-term history of direct representation as through the Montgomery Fire Protection District and the Metropolitan Area Advisory committees. Disadvantal!es: I. Projects that fall within the boundaries of the MPC and the SWP AC, would continue to be reviewed by both committees, and therefore, be in conflict with the EDC Permit -g'- Page 3, Item 3 Meeting Date~!:9.~!!}!!2~"! Streamlining recommendation. 2. Negative impact on staff time and City costs to staff three (3)'related committees in the area: 1) Otay Committee 2) MPC and 3) SWPAC. 3. Negative financial impact on project proponents with the necessity to attend an additional meeting which could require the attendance of costly project consultants. Option 2: Dissolve the MPC and ask that the existing SWPAC members vote to add the existing MPC members to its committee. * The committee would perform advisory functions to the Redevelopment Agency on Southwest projects only pursuant to Agency Resolution 1309. Advantages: 1. Spirit of the EDC Permit Streamlining recommendation would be served. 2. Indirect community representation would be present through the absorption of MPC members into the SWPAC which covers approximately 40% of the entire MPC area. 3. Staff time and City costs would be reduced by eliminating one (1) of the three (3) committees for the area. 4. Remove a project processing cost for project proponents. Disadvantages: 1. Lose the advantages stated in Option 1. 2. Up to 60% of the Montgomery Area could be unrepresented, except at the Planning Commission level, for projects occurring outside of the Southwest Project Area. 3. Community project and planning input in the initial stages would be limited to redevelopment projects. * Note: There are three (3) current vacancies on the SWPAC, and therefore could accommodate the three (3) remaining MPC members. .. Option 3: Retain the MPC but take action to merge the MPC members into the SWPAC and combine their respective roles and functions. The three (3) MPC members would wear "two hats" and have voting rights on all items brought before them as either the MPC or as the SWPAC. The balance of the committee members would have voting rights on SWPAC items only. Advantal!es: 1. Retain all of the advantages listed in Option 1, however, the Montgomery "representation" would be limited to three (3) slots on the combined committee. 2. All of the disadvantages of Option 1 would be eliminated. Disadvantages: -9- Page 4, Item .3 Meeting Date!'I!~rt2:m~'j;~ 1. Agenda could be long and require substantial staff time and City costs from both the Community Development and Planning Departments. , 2. Administration of the committee would be difficult and confusing with only three (3) members able to vote on Montgomery issues. 3. Additional policy questions would need'to be addressed regarding the future membership and the corresponding voting rights of the committee members as vacancies occur. 4. Coul1 be confusing to the public. Option 4: Retain the MPC as in Option 3, however, all members of the "new" committee would wear "two hats" and have voting rights on all items brought before them as the MPC or as the SWPAC. Advanta!!es: 1. Retain all of tl1e advantages listed in Option 1, with the added benefit (over Option 3) that all members of the committee would have MPC voting rights. 2. All of the Option 1 disadvantages would be eliminated. 3. Option 3 disadvantages (except #1) would be eliminated. . Disadvanta!!es: 1. Agenda could be lengthy and require substantial staff time and City costs from both the Community Development and Planning Departments. 2. Montgomery representation would not be as direct as under Option I since not all committee members will be required to be residents of Montgomery. 3. Additional policy questions would need to be addressed regarding the future "slots" (ie., business owner, resident, at-large etc.,) to be included in the structure of the "new" . committee and filled as vacancies occur. F1SCAL IMPACT: Undetermined. However, the EDC Recommendation was made in order to streamline the project review process by avoiding project review duplication and confusion. Option 2 is the only option that would-reduce the financial impact on City staff time and costs, while Options 1, 3, and 4 would have varying degrees of fIScal impacts. C:\WPSllBA YNES\RI!PORTS\Ml'CSWPAC.113 -If) - COUNCIL SUB-COMMITTEE REPORT ON MONTGOMERY"PL~NNING COMMISSION FUTURE 1\ EXHIBIT A- +0 ~ ~b.'+ 13 ~.I - ,. 11. ~ In response to the City Economic "Development commission's report to Council on reducing the applicants and City staff cost in processing land use processing time, the Council appointed Mayor Nader and Councilman Moore as a subcommittee to review the three proj ect Area Contini ttees and the Montgomery Planning Committee. This report is a follow-up of recently approved PAC's report and sub-committees alternatives on the future of the Montgomery Planning Committee which involves the Southwest Project Area and associated PAC. Your subcommittee agreed to disagree and reached a consensus to present to the Council as an agenda item listing various alternatives without bias. Our report will be combined with a typical staff A-113 report and staff will present the pros and cons for each alternative. Supporting background information including City ordinances, resolutions and agenda items involving verbiage that notes directions the council of 1985 was pursuing. It's to be noted the MPC had a number of resignations resulting in having only three of seven members, thereby not having a quorum for approximately a-year-. (..:,,' ..".' ::: .. BACKGROUND: December 30, 1992 marked the seventh year of the committee. In those seven years, the primary function in forming the committee (Council agenda 7/2/85) was completed, to develop a community element of the General Plan, resulting in the "MONTGOMERY SPECIFIC PLAN". In the pursuit of that extensive and demanding element, the community's own local residents worked well with area property owners proving the committee's value during this initial transition period following annexation. Like, the City's General Plan major updates, the process was lengthy, involving mayor changes in zoning in favor of and adverse to property owners. In addition to this major effort, various other land use projects of somewhat routine also came before the committee including their recommendations regarding Capital Improvement Projects and Block Grant fund allocations. .. The following alternatives regarding the "MPC are set forth without priority or bias by the subcommittee: 1. Retain Committee with land use role as per original purpose. Continue to be initial contact for property owners arid residents of original annexed area. Fill vacancies soon,. . Dissolve committee having successfully completed it's primary function. Retain existing' talent through legal processing remaining members into the southwest Redevelopment Project Area Committee presently having 3-4 vacancies. The Southwest PAC involves about 40% of ex- fire district plus car dealer property north of ilL" -11- .. . _'!~ .. Street. 3. Retain committee with specific role and function but merqe present 3 members into Southw~st PAC for continuity, combine role and function, with MPC members wearing two hats - serving two roles: a. MPC members serving as Southwest PAC with PAC agenda b. MPC members serving as MPC with MPC agenda. c. Consider dissolvement of MPC 12/30/95 (tenth anniversary) 4. As per No. 3 but at end of the 3-year state required PAC (December 1993), the two membership and function would be combined. The new committee would then advise Council/Agency regarding land use -covering combined redevelopment and Fire District area. 325 3/26/93 , --I,;l- 4 ......,----.- '"" J, '.-_ BACKGROUND INFORMATION LEADING TO MONTGOMERY ANNEXATION,TO CHUL~ VIST~ ~ND EST~BLISHING THE MONTGOMERY ~RE~ P~NNING COMMITTEE 1) Council meeting of 7/2/85 Discussion and direction to staff noting 6/15/85 meeting directed staff to set a public hearing to consider forming a Community Planning committee for Montgomery are~ if annexed. An ordinance providinq Council option to 'commit to appointinq top vote qetters in an advisory election. 2) THE PRIMARY AND INITIAL FUNCTION OF THE P~NNING COMMITTEE - to develop a community element of the General Plan. (results: the Montgomery Specific Plan) 3) Verbiage, not action as to, how lonq such a committee miqht continue to function Important for council to contemplate expanding all City boards and commissions to help facilitate the assimilation of the community into the City and mitiqate the lonq term need for a special planninq committee. 4) The above action accomplished on 7/16/85, Ordinance No. 2119, committing the City Council to appoint top seven (7) vote getters, would be elected to oriqinal 2-vear terms but subsequent terms would be filled bv appointment bv the City Council. NOTE: 1. The above would indicate the'MPC would phase out at an ,undetermined time with assimilation of area residents into City commissions and committees. with the Southwest PAC in place and the size of the project area, the ppase out of this time with all things considered is appropriate and merger of MPC members will provide excellent talent. ~ 2. Committee/Commission data notes there are now approximately 30 residents of the past fire district serving Chula Vista within the various commissions that are the basis for formulating City policies and procedures. :: \montg '- _ /3- - !11fj~IIf~~~ilqt~nti~fr~UKJ!~lf!!!iiiEl .. . '" -- .., /tf . , ,. ~ TOWN CENTRE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE btHfBlf 1i-1- . . t"n E~lJ;+- ~ , PURPOSE: The Town Centre Project Area Committee (rCP AC) serves as a local redevelopment project review advisory body. Members are appointed by Council to represent business owners, business tenants and residents from within the Project Area and serve as a resource to advise and provide comments on redevelopment matters affecting the Town Centre I and IT Redevelopment Project Areas. The TCP AC is no longer operating under the State of California mandated responsibilities for Project Area Committees under Health and Safety Code Sections 33385 through 33388. ROLE AND FUNCTION: The TCPAC reviews all projects requiring discretionary land use approvals by the Redevelopment Agency and/or City Council through Conditional Use Permits/Special Permits, Zone Changes and other land use permits as specifically allowed pursuant to the Town Centre I and II Redevelopment Plans and the Town Centre Procedures Manual. Projects that do not require discretionary approval by the Agency or Council and/or those that can be approved "administratively" as set forth in the Municipal Code (e.g. a non- discretionary site plan review) are not to be reviewed by the TCPAC. In addition, Variances are not to be re led by the TCPAC unless it is included as part of'a project that requires a discretionary land use aPJlHJVal as described above. Variances will'be handled "administratively", and those variances that cannot be decided administratively, will be forwarded directly to the Redevelopment Agency. The primary role of the TCPAC is to evaluate projects brought before them in terms of overall land use appropriateness, general economic impact of land use changes, and related planning and zoning issues. The TCPAC is to receive and review the project site plan and all applicable materials submitted to the City in support of the development application including the respective environmental documents. However, the review of the environmental documents (Environmental Impact Reports or Negative Declarations) is to use them as tools for' evaluating the project, and not to'review them in tenns of the adequacy of the document itself. ' The TCPAC will also continue their role as the Parking Place Commission. It shall review parking improvements, procurement, regulations, fee s![ucture, enforcement, and revenues and expenditures related to the parking facilities provided in the Town Centre I project area. As the Commission, they will forward .:ecommendations to the Redevelopment Agency/City Council as appropriate. In addition to all of the above, t final secondary role is to also evaluate project characteristics relative to the site plan, or .site,specific" ssues related to safety such as pedestrian/traffic safety, internal traffic patterns/circulation, parking, lighting, lOise, signage and drainage. A more focused review of the above stated issues along with all environmental mpacts and building design/aesthetics will be performed by the RCC and Design Review Committee (DRC) espectfully. Landscaping is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect. ill ~ w> AC members, upon appointment, are to be scheduled for indoctrination about the scOpe of their role nd function both in terms of the overall function of the redevelopment process, and- the specific goals of :;development within the Town Centre Redevelopment Project Area. The Role and Function description Iill be incoIporated in the updated Boards and Commissions Handbook. _15- .. PROCESS: Upon completion of the environmental review process by staff, the project is presented to the TCPAC. The project, along with all TCPAC comments, is then presented to the RCC, for review and adoption of the environmental document. Then the project, with all cumulative comments, is reviewed by DRC for approval of the site and building plans. Finally, all cumulative comments and any conditions of approval imposed by the RCC and DRC, are forwarded to the Agency and/or City Council for final project approval. ."'... ... _/6_ PURPOSE: OTAY VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE EX.HIBIT A - 2 , -t-o f)(~b:-\- ~ The Olay Valley Road Project Area Committee (OVRPAC) serves as a loc:Sl redevelopment project review advisory body. Members are appointed by Council to represent business owners, business tenants and ' residents from within the Project Area and serve as a resource to advise and provide comments on redevelopment matters affecting the Olay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area. The OVRPAC is no longer operating under the Slate of California mandated responsibilities for Project Area Committees under Health and Safety'Code Sections 33385 through 33388. ROLE AND FUNCTION: The OVRP AC reviews all projects requiring discretionary land use approvals by the Redevelopment Agency and/or City Council through Conditional Use Permits/Special Permits, Zone Changes and other land use' permits as specifically allowed pursuant to the Olay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan and the Olay Valley Road Procedures Manual. Projects that do not require discretionary approval by the Agency or Council and/or those that can be approved "administratively" as set forth in the Municipal Code (e.g. a non- discretionary site plan review) are not to be reviewed by the OVRPAC. In addition, Variances are not to be reviewed by the OVRP AC unless it is included as part of a project that requires a discretionary land use ap. al as described above. Variances will be handled .administratively., and those variances that cannot be decided administratively, will be forwarded directly to the Redevelopment Agency. The primary role of the OVRP AC is to evaluate projects brought before them in terms of overall land use appropriateness, general economic impact of land use changes, and related planning and zoning issues. The OVRPAC is to receive and review the project site plan and all applicable materials submitted to the City in support of the development application including the respective environmental documents" However, the review of the environmental documents (Environmental Impact Reports or Negative Declarations) is to use them as tools for evaluating the project, and not to review them in terms of the adequacy of the document itself, "', ' A secondary role is to also evaluate the project characteristics relative to the site plan, or .site specific" issues related to safety such as pedestrian/traffic safety, internal traffic patterns/circulation, parking,lighting, noise, signage and drainage. A more focused r~view of the above stated issues along with all environ menial impacts and building design/aesthetics will be performed by the RCC and Design Review Committee (DRC) respectfully. Landscaping is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect. All OY.RPAC members, upon appointment, are to be scheduled for indoctrination abo!!t the scope of their role and function both in terms of the overall function of the redevelopment process, and the specific goals of redevelopment within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project"Area. The Role and Function :lescfiotion will be incorporated in the updated Boards and Commissions Hand~k. PROCESS: Upon completion of the environmental review process by staff, the project is presented to the OVRPAC. The project, along with all OVRP AC comments, is then presented to the RCC for adoption of the environmental document. Then the project, with all cumulative com~ents, is reviewed by DRC for approval "f th.. ~t.. ~"" hu:IA:"ft .,I"...,p;"~"" <ill1'''':mll~ment.<;.,.and;ltnl ('.nnn;finn~~nrnv:!l imoo<PJ! ~1_ SOUTHWEST PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE !i:V.p~~ij)Wf fh ~ "'--? [^H.~B 14 t'A -<- Effective:. January 1994. PURPOSE: The Southwest Project Area Committee (SWPAC) currently serves as a:State mandated redevelopment project review recommending body. Members are currently' elected and serve under the mandated responsibilities for Project Area Committees under, California Health and Safety Code' Sections 33385 through 33388. The State mandated status is effective through December 1993. Begiiming in January 1994, the members are to be appointed by Council to repreSent business owners, business tenants and residents from within the Project Area and serve as a local redevelopment project review advisory body on redevelopment matters affecting the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area in the same manner as the Town Centre and Otay Valley Road Project Area Committees. ROLE AND FUNCTION: The SWPAC reviews all projects requiring discretionary land use approvals by the Redevelopment Agency and/or City Council through Conditional Use Permits/Special Permits, Zone Changes and other land use permits as specifically allowed pursuant to the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and the Montgomery Specific Plan. Projects that do not require discretionary approval by the Agency or Council and/or those that can be approved "administratively' as set forth in the Municipal Code (e.g. a non-discretionary site plan review) are not reviewed by the SWPAC. In addition, Variances are not to be reviewed by the SWPAC unless it is included as part of a project that requires a discretionary land use approval as described abOve. Variances will be handled .administratively., and those variances that cannot be decided administratively, will be forwarded directly to the Redevelopment Agency. The primary role of the SWPAC is to evaluate projects brought before them in terms of overaIlland use appropriateness, general economic impact of land use changes, and related planning and zOning issues. The SWPAC is to receive and review the project site plan and all applicable materials submitted to the City in support of the development application including the respective environmental documents. However, the review of the environmental documents (Environmental Impact Reports or Negative Declarations) is to use them as tools for evaluating the project, and not to :review them in tenns of the adequacy of the document itself. A secondary role is to also evaluate the project characteristics relative to the site plan, or .site specific. issues related to safety such as pedestrian/traffic~safety, internal traffic patterns/circulation, parking,lighting, noise, signage and drainage. A more focused review of the above stated issues along with all environmental impacts and building design/aesthetics will be performed by the RCC and Design Review Committee (DRC) respectfully. Landscaping is to be reviewed and approved by the City's Landscape Architect. All SWP AC members, upon appointment, are to be scheduled for indoctrination about the scope of their role an4 function both in terms of the overall function of the redevelopment process, and the specific goals of redevelopment within the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area. The Role and Function description will be incorporated in the updated Boards and Commissions Handbook. PROCESS: Upon completion of the environmental review process by staff, .the project is presented to the SWP Af:-. The project, along with the SWPAC comments, is then presented to the RCC for review and adoption of the ~~~~~~~d~n:~t:,~en ~:~~~~ ~.~,~~~~=~"rr:~:"~:,is,,,,~~:~ ~~?,,:,~~ ~~~~ _/ f' EXHIBIT B \-D. ROLE AI\'D FUNCTION OF PROJECT AREA COM:MTTTEES ~b;t B The City Council, through motion on 6 October. authorized one or two members of Coundl to meet with representatives of the three PACs and the Montgomery Planning Committee along with EDC representative and staff members. On Councilman Moare's written request, a warkshop with the aforementioned met on October 12th resulting in a consensus that PACs were beneficial, du'ties uncertain, role and responsibilities should be specific, duplication and delays in praject processing need to be reduced. Priar to. adjournment it was agreed that the variaus representatives would speak with their colleagues and make a report, the results of which Councilman Moare wauld correlate, present to. their specific committee for review, comment on endorsement; repackage and present to. Council for actian. A number af meetings of three PACs have occurred wlth role and functions reviewed and modified. All three PACS have approved of revised rale and functions as ratified. PROJECT AREA COMJ\1ITTEES: It is recommended the Council approve the fallowing; L Retain All Three PACs and Their Revised Rale and Functians A. Ensure Town Centre and Otay Valley farmulating action be reviewed and if needed, amended to. ensure any state mandates is deleted. B. Staff prepare Sauthwest Redevelapment PAC farmulating ordinance amendment so that upon completion of year three "all reference to. State mandates etc., will have been deleted. C. The City Council! Agency approve the Role and Function of the Project Area Committees as preSeI1ted by your council sub- committee and staff with" directions to the City Clerk and City Attarney to update the Cammission Handbook and provide specific legal form required by this action , 2. Enviranmental Imoact Reoorts Reviewed by PACs sufficiently to advise the Agency on major projects as set forth in Role and Function Statement only with no, up/down, vote on the Em itself, therefore not duplicating the more knowledgeable RCC role. When appropriate the PACs may forward comments with supporting rationale to the DRC, RCC and Agency. Said comments shall be answered by environmental Coordinator with copy. to appropriate PAC as per any routine input. tC:\WPSIICOUNcn.IPAC-RaLE. "IXT) Page 1 February 9, 1993 -/q - .3. Proiect Reviews The P ACs shall review all major projects sufficient to advise f>.gency as set forth . in Role and Functions with the rationale the PACs will not duplicate what the Professionals on Design Review Board and Resource Conservation Committee are assigned to accomplish but rather the overall effect in Project Area: Parking, Traffic, customer draw, excessive rompetition, bond limitations versus inrome, Agency subsidy, effect on both business and adjoining residential rommunity, and that'both are aware of forthroming major changes well in advance of fruition. 4. Bylaws Be Deleted From Use Bylaws will not be required with rewrite of Role and functions and full use offue Board and Commission Handbook, which with approval of this Section of report will require another update. Review of various Committee Bylaws noted, that unless the Bylaws went beyond Purpose, the format and guidelines were in the handbook including role and functions, meeting place, etc., plus roberts Rules of Order sufficient for most occasions. This information is also reinforced with the City Clerks Annual review of above for all commissions and rommittee members and proposed indoctrination of PAC members regarding rationale of redevelopment. .. , Page 2 .-.February 9, 1993 (c:\wps I\COUNCIL\PACROLE.TX11 -:1-0- . ~ -. -----~---- . . OTA Y VALLEY PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE - ROLE AND FUNCTION The Otay Valley Project Area Committee (pAC) is charged to review all plans within the project area as pertains to land use. Plans shall be reviewed in a manner reflecting of an area overseer rather than as an architect or environmental reviewing authority, which is the specific responsibilities of the Design Review Committee and Resource Conservation Commission. The PAC. will be first in the reviewing process and shall be diligent as to the overa1! effectiveness of the project area as it pertains to the fonawing: Fiscal well being, pedestrian safety, internal and external traffic movements, acceIerat,jon lanes, turning radius, -parking, lighting, noise, signage, drainage, hazardous waste, class one landfills, effect of each and cumulative projects on adjoining residential neighborhoods and businesses. The PAC shall be specifically aware of reviewing projects in a timely manner, special and/or joint meetings with other reviewing authorities may be most appropriate at times to reduce processing and staff time. An annual report and review on the fiscal status of the project area including but not limited to bond debt, income and ability to pay debt and invest is required. PAC comments and recommendations shall be forwarded to the City Council/Agency. All committee members will be scheduled for indoctrination upon appointmenrand on an annual basis, with staff facilitators. Information as to rationale of redevelopment, note ad function and review of commission handbook will be included in this indoctrination. .. Page 1 February 9, 1993 (C:\WPSIICOUNCn.\OVRD-PAC.1XT] - j)-f - " THE TOWN CENTRE I AI\'D II PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE ROLE AND FUNCTION The Town Centre I and II Project Area Committee shall 'review each area project inv~lving land use issues (not in compliance with regular;ons and policies, i.e., projects that require land use permits and/or variances). The Committee will review these projects prior to the Design Review Committee and the Resource Conservation Commission, and will forward comments to the said committees as appropriate. The Committee is charge4 to view projects as an overall owner, manager, and concern for safety of pedestrians. The Committee shall be " diligent as to the overall effectiveness of the area as it pertains to each and cumulative projects, i.e. business vacancies, pedestrian lighting, noise, shopper security, customer draw, over saturation of like merchants, drainage, transportation, bike riding and racks, overall aesthetics, "hazardous materials, parking, walkways, traffic circulation and safety, signage, effect on adjoining business and residents. The Committee will be presented an Annual Report on the fiscal status of project areas I and II to include but not limited to bond debt, ann"uaI income and ability to pay debt. In the Committee's role as (he Parking Place Commission, it shall, in addition to the above, review parking improvements, procurement, regulations, fee structure, enforcement, and revenues and expenditures, The Committee wilJ forward recommendations to the Redevelopment Agency/City Council as appropriate. :..'\ ~ >- Page 1 Fe!tPuary 10, 1993 (C:\WP.S I\COUNCR.\TC.I-II.1XTJ (MIT DISK nI\TC.I.ll.lXTl -/)fJ-- "' ITEM 14 . . . . EX.HIBIT C RESTRICT ROLE OF PACs TO DUTIES REQUIRED 'BYLA W; DISBAND ., TC1, Tcn, & OV P~Cs WITIIIN ONE YEAR; DISBANJ? SW PAC t-o WITHIN THREE YEARS FROM ITS FORMATION (14). . Ex~ilzAt f!:, Imolement.ation Steos: A. . - 1. Prepare resolution to disband Southwest, Otay Valley, and To~n Centre PAC's effective July 93. (See Item Ill? regarding future role of Montgomery Planning Committee) .. 2. Submit for review to appropriate bodies (see below). 3. Agency adopt resolutions. B. Advisorv Group Inout: I. Submit Southwest PAC resolution to the Southwest PAC and Montgomery Planning Commiuee. 2. Submit Otay Valley and Town Centre PAC resolutions to each group respecti vel y . C. Timeframes: l. 2. Prepare resolutions: Submit to Agency for adoption: 3 months I month Total: 4 months D. Prioritization: High .. ~;2.3- . , . SOUTIrWEST PROJECT AREA COMM1:TTEE - ROLE"& FUNCTION- The Southwest Project Area Committee (SWPAC) is charged to review all plans within the project area as they pertain to land use including public improvements. Plans shall be reviewed in a manner reflecting an area overseer rather than as an architect Of environmental reviewing authority, which is the specific -responsibility of the Design Review committee and Resource Conseryation_ Commission. Relocation and procedures of residents due to potential razing of dwclling units and the reduction of residential units, is a major review and advisory responsibility of the committee. The SWP AC will be first in the project reviewing process and shall be diligent as to the overall well being and effectiveness of the project area as it pertains to the following: Pedestriin safety, traffic circulation, parking, lighting, noise, signage, drainage, hazardous waste, effect of each and cumulative projects on both adjoining residents and businesses, availability of mass transportation, acceleration and turn lanes, walkways, building vacancies excessive competition, etc. The SWPAC shall be specifically aware of reviewing pr9jects in a timely manner, special and or joint meetings with other reviewing authorities may be most appropriate at times to reduce processing and staff time. An annual report and review on the fiscal status of the project area including but not limited to bond debt, income and ability to pay debt and invest is required. SWPAC comments and recommendations shall be forwarded to the City CounciU Agency. All committee members will be scheduled for an indoctrination and appointment and on an annual basis, with staff facilitators. Information as to rationale of redevelopment, Role, and Function and review of commission handbook wiWbe included in this indoctrination. , . Page 1 February 9, 1993 . -pl- - (C:\WP5I\COUNCILISW-PAC."IXTl ,"",..' , ' . i I. I " I ,~ ... I fa j - . ':. '.:{.'!-. .:. .. .. !...\. ':,.~.':'. . .);. ~ ':~. ~:.:' .... :: coiilcrlt~SrAIDm ,', , \.~~~~~::.~t~~-=:..~~.\~:..:,:...:.. rt.. 17 .' ',,~,~,;', ,,;,: ' , ....Un; Otto 9/1.,85 .' .,,~. . :~...~~..',; '., ITDI TmLI ....111tIon I~/"'" ~.;g"c...;cl1 Poiitlon 'aper on tII. 'ropond .. '.," ' ',,," ""'t~_~ ~...tlon ,',' - E ~ IT" DI'~~ of ;""a~/~~~,1L,~::', ':'~!>:~ (4J1~ ;~~-;;; --;:D--- If J![VID/tI) BT: CIty _agyf ,-:-'~'::' ~':_::-::-=-' ";' ~ At ti.. K.\'OtIb.;~. 1985 .Tectlon. ~:~:I::~~'-~~ '~. ~ty or.. cumntTY u..od ~ by'th. Montgo<nlT)' FI... 'rotectlon Di.trlct wI 11 be ..tlng on tho fhu. of .n..utlon tQ tII. CIty of Chu', Vista. In CrOar tQ .sslst tII. CIty Ccuncl1 end steff In .n,..rlng que1tfons and p1annfng for the potentfa1 anntxat10n: staff h<<s pr.plred . propostd Counc11 '.sltlon suu_t (ExhIbIt A) Sl/IIIToIrlzlng tII. CIty S pol1cllS ...;ardlng sptclflc .orvlce end fl.ea1 q..stlc.. ...1.ted tQ tile p~~04 .......Uon. RCtXIPfIE;IDJ.TIo.., 'Ib.t Ccunc11 adopt tile ....1.don .~ng tII. Ccuncl1 PosItion '.per on tIIa propOlad Mcntgceory annautlon. . ' BOJ.RDS/COMMISSIOWS RICOMMrHCATlo..: K.A. " DI5C1JSSION' ' i I I I . On "Aprl1 20. U8Z tII. CIty Ccunel1 adopted. pnv1c.. Ccunc11 PosItion '.ptr on tII. pro- pos.d .nnoxotl.n /.tt.ch.d .s ExhIbIt B). 'lba propos.d Posltl.n '.per fs ....ntl.ll)' .n updoUd end ,l1g11t1y ...fo....tted wrslon of tII. on. approv.d by tII. Ccuncl1 In 198Z. " , At' fi,' S.j,t..bor 3. 1985 ..tlng. tII. Couftc11 approwd tIIa fo11ow1ng two pollQ' 'ta~nts for fne1uslon fn tII. propoud .ositlon 'apers , 1. It I' tII. CIty', Inttnt tII.t ..._"" ....r.ted In Ibnt_ry wi11 be"spont fn IIontgo<nlry tQ provide tII. ..... witll tho .... 1ov.1 of IIIJItIc1p.1 u..lc.. a, tho ....t of tho CIty .nd to provide for en axtonslw caplte1 f.,ro...nt program to upgrade ....d end dralno~ 'Y'~' %. For ton yura .ftOr tII. ~ff.ct1Y~ 'd.ta of tII. .nnexatlon. tII. City tounel1'w111 not fo.. .n .........t district In the IIontg""'ry .rs. for It....t l~roY....nts (curt., gutt.rs, ,ldow.1kl. orp.v.""nt) un1... prop.rty own.... "p...s.ntlng .t hut %/3 of tII. ..... fn tII. propOled dIstrict .apport fU fo....tlon. If .pproved by the Ccuncl1. tII. Posltlon.'aper wi11 be p",v1ded to tIIa publlc or tII. p..... upon ,.qUlSt. . FISCAL f!!PACTI 'lb. propoud PositiOn ".ptr' fnc1udoo tII. Ibov. ,0111:1 .ta_nt ""rid 1. : ... '~.. . .. : :..':~~.~.: ~RTI.b ' r .. -'.:-J ......,..~. ..' I ~pi./~~'=j,.~:i.::.:.~': .:~. ._..._1. _ "- -, ,-- by tho'Cl1)' Council of Chul~ VI:Ii; Callromlt Fo",A-113 (Rav. 11/le D.lod .,~~4-~ --.-.- :.:..- ..--..... -~ EXHIBIT 0 ttJ I?Y-~ \a;{- B . t t . t " _ .;2J - ITEM 17 MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE \ . A. ImDlementation SteDs: L Complete legal analysis of merger of Southwe$t Redevelopment Project Area Committee into the Montgomery Planning" Committee. 2. Define membership and responsibilities of combined committee .' 3. Review recommendations with Advisory Task Force that needs to be formed. 4. Prepare Municipal Code amendment to establish revised committee and present to Council and Agency for adoption. ' B. Advisorv Groul) InDut: An Advisory Task Force, including representatives of both existing committees, Economic Development Commission, and the Planning Commission should be formed to formulate final recommendations on this matter. c. Timeframe: 3 months D. Prioritization: High .. -,).t.;. - ... . ADOPTDJ IJ.CJ APPROVED BY THE"1:rTY .CCUQ.. a: TI-E CITY Of ~ VI:ml, CALIf'CflMA, II"" 24th *to 0' ..p~_r r~j'~, bJ 'ho foll~ ...... ~~ " AY~ Co<mc:U_.... COx, 1IDon, 1Icot.t., IIcCandU.. HAYES: A8STAU~ ASSfNT: Co<mc:I1-.... Counc:n...,.rs COunen_.... .e>z>e Kon. Malcolm ~_ . ~!..c:._ Am ~~f't,7' City . STATE C1! CAUFORNIA ) COUNTY C1! SAN DIEGO I II. OTY Of OU.A VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FUI.ASZ, CMC, QTY a..ERK 01 ,he Olr 01 CIUa VII'a. California, 00 HEREBY a:RTIFY lllal the obove GIld tonlQOhg II 0 full, I.... one! cornie' COPJ of RESOlUTION HO. 12177 . and Iha' ,he lOIN hal no' "". omended... repealed. CATEC 7-;<0- '8; .-.... .. .~......,...:-,. C.eafl ~~~y ClIr Clefk .~..:;() -).1- . -", auO!.OTIOK KO. 12171 USOLOTIOft or ~n an =CIL or ftl an or aOLA VI"A APPROVIftO COOftC1L POSUIOtI PAPIR 011 ftl UOPOSID lIotmOOIIDr AJlRUA~IOft ~b. C1t]' coaocli 0;- u~ C:1~r of c:i.Giaytet.dO;;- h<.by r..ol.e .. Lollov.r WHEREAS, at tb. .o.ember 5, 1,eS electiOD, ~be citizena ot the Coantr are. currently .erYed b~ the Montgo.err 'ire Protection Diatrlct viII be Yotini OD the iaaue -of uDexatioD to ~be City ot Chula Vi.ta, and . WBEUAS, In order to ...i.t ~h. City Council .nd ataff in anav.ring que.tione and placnini for tbe potential annexation, atatt ba. prepared a propo.ed Council Poattion Paper, attacbed bereto a. Elhibit A and incorporated berein by eelereac. a. it .et tortb 1n tuII, aum=arizini tbe City'. polict.. ceiardic9 epeeltie .ervice aDd fleeal que.tiona related to tha propoaad annalation. ROW, ~ERErORE, SB %T AZSOLVZD that the City Council ot the City of CbuIa Viata 40.a bereby approve tbe Council 'oaitlon '.per on the propo..d lContgoMry Annexation a. .et torth In Izb1b1t A. App<oy .. to lora by 0772. .. . -,~ I ; (. . I ; : , . , ~ f I ( . ! . i I - J-Y - . . ~~' EXHIBIT A -+0 f&w 1;1./11 ~ CITY COUNCIL 'POSITION PAPER ON THE PROPOSED MONTG0!1ERY ANNEXATION - September 24. 1985 On November 5. 1985. the citizens (if the San Diego County area currently within the Montgomery Fire Protection District will be voting on the issue of annexation to the City of Chula Vista. The Chula Vista Ci~ Council has adopted this Mposition paper" in order to: Establish the City's policies related to the potential annexation of the area; . Help the residents of the area understand what effects annexation would have on them; Assist. City officials in answering questions concerning the proposed annexation; .., Provide early planning that would help assure a smooth transition of the area into the City if its residents vote to annex to Chula Vista. . The City's underlying policies regarding the potential annexation of the area. currently served by the Montgome~ Fire Protection District are: 1. Revenues generated in Montgome~ will be spent in Montgorne~ to provide the area with the same level of municipal services as the rest ~f the City and to provide for an extensive capital improvement .program to upgrade public facilities in the area such as curbs. gutters. sidewalks. roads. drainage systems. and parks. 2. Recognizing the uniqueness and size of this potential annexation. the City will provide special processes to insure a smooth transition of the area into the Ci~. The remainder of this document summarizes the City's pJlicies regarding specific seryice and fiscal questions related to the proposed annexation. The issues will be discussed in the following categories: . ... Zoning and Development Issues Public Safety Social and Leisure Services - Public facilities - fiscal Issues Miscellaneous Issues ,. Special Transition Processes _ ~1- 11 .-.-- . ~ '.. \.. A. ZONIIIG MID DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 1. HOW WILL LAND USES IN THE AREA CURRENTLY WITHIN THE MOIITGOMERY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BE CHANGED UPON ANNEXATION TO tHE CITY OF CHULA VISTA? " :- County zoning regulations wil1 'continue to prevaH white a study is conducted to determine the relationship of existing development. County zoning regulations and proposed City zoning for 'the area. The Montgomery Planning Committee will review these issues and roake recormnendations to the Planning Comnission and City CouncH on a proposed zoning plan. Public hearings will be conducted to help develop the zoning plan. Existing legal land uses in the area wi 11 not be changed. Those legal land uses that do not conform to the governing zon1ng regulations will be allowed to remain as nonconforming land uses as long as the use remains in operation. 2. HOW WILL ZONING ENFORCEMENT IN THE AREA BE CARRIED OUT UPON ANNEXATION TO THE CITY? While County zoning continues to apply. the City witt enforce the, County zoning standards. This will probably be done by responding to complaints in regard to zoning violations. When the City zoning takes effect, the City will then enforce the City standards in the area. with existing legal land uses allowed to continue, as described ~ in Question 1. 3. WILL THE HOUSING REHABILITATION PROGRAM (CHIP) IN THE AREA BE CHANGED UPON ANNEXATION? It appears that the present Housing Rehabilitation Program being administered by the County will be extended for at least one more year. After that the City will expand its program, which is equal to or better than the County program, into the area. 4. WILL ALL OR PART OF THE AREA BE ESTABLISHED AS A REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AFTER ANNEXATION? ... ' . As part of an agreement with the County, the City has agreed not to fonn a Redevelopment Project that would include any area currently served by the riontgomery Fire Protection District for at least four years after the effective date of the annexation. Redevelopment would require broad community support in a joint pUblic/private sector effort. The City would work with the cOlIII\unity to detennine the desirability and feasibility of redevelopment. -2 - - _ 3v ~ . . :, '. 5. HOW WILL THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING CO/folImE BE INTEGRATED INTO THE CITY'S PLANNING PROCESS AFTER ANNEXATION? '- The Montgomery Pl anni ng Committee will functi on as an advf sory body to the Planning Commission and City Council for issues affecting the area. The Committee. will fonnulate recommendations on all types of land use applications filed within the area. In addition. the Committee will be charged with the responsibility of recommending a Community Plan for the area. 'Primary staffing for the Montgomery Planning Committee will come from the City's Planning and Engineering Departments. In addition. Community Development and other City departments would support this effort as needed. B. PUBLIC SAFETY 6.. WHAT LEVEL OF POLICE PROTECTION WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? The City will provide police protection equivalent to that provided in the City. At least 25 positions will be added to the City's Police Department in order to bring the area's police service up to a level equivalent to that provided in the City. The additional Police Department positions would include at least the following: -' 15 Patrol Staff 4 Investigative Staff 1 Evidence Technician 1 Communication Operator 1 Animal Control Officer 3 Clerical Staff ~ Additional Police Positions 7. WHAT LEVEL OF FIRE PROTECTION WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? There' will be no change in the area's level of fire prevention and suppression service. .Both the Chula Vista and Montgomery fire Protection District firefighters receive the same type of training and all are trained as Emergency Medical Technicians (EMf). The Fire Protection District will .be dissolved on the effective date of the annexation. when the City will assume responsibility for fire protection in the area. The City will continue to operate the existing Fire Protection District station on Oxford Street. - 3 - ~3!- , ... .' ... .i ;, ) --- . . 8. WHAT lEVEL OF ANIMAL CONTROL .SERVICE WIll BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? .......... The City will provide the same level of animal. control service provided to Chula Vista residents including. patrols~rvices from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. most weekdays and on Saturday afternoons. The animal shelter is located at 690 Otay Valley Road and is normally open 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 9:00 a.m. to noon on Sa turday. . C. SOCIAl AND:lEISURE SERVICES 9. HOW WIll LIBRARY SERVICE BE PROVIDED IN .THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? No change is expected in the foreseeable. future in the level of libra~ service provided in the area. Residents of the area currently borrow almost as many books from the Chula Vista Public library (59,000 per year) as fror.l the two County branch libraries (63,000) in Castle Park and Woodlawn. The City and County have agreed to keep the two County branch libraries open for the foreseeable future after annexation by keeping the area withi n the existing County libra~ District. Under this agreement, the City will pay the County the difference between the operating cost of the two branch libraries and the District's revenue generated in the area. The City is already planning to conduct a comprehensive facilities study which will include libra~ facilities and will examine ongoing __ community needs regarding library services. Upon annexation the area will be included in this City-wide study to establish a plan for appropriate long-term library services and facilities. 10. WHAT lEVEL OF RECREATION SERVICES WIll BE PROVIDED UPON ANNEXATION? The City will enter into negotiations with MAAC, the County's current contractor, to continue providing programs at the lauderbach Community Center. To complement those programs, the City will offer more general recreation services at the Center and will start providing weekend cl asses and recreational opportunities.. In addition, the City will provide after school playground programs at both the lauderbach and r~ontgome~ elementa~ school s. The after school playground programs already being provided by the City at the Harborside, Rice, Castle Park. and Otay elementary schools will continue to be available to area residents. 11. VllAT LEVEl OF PARK SERVICE WILL BE 1'ROYIDED UPON ANNEXATION~ The City will maintain the existing parks adjacent to the lauderbach and Woodlawn Community Centers. either by contract or by City staff. The City would also strive to increase the amount of park acreage from the area's current ratio of 0.2 acres per thousand population to the City's standard of 2.0 acres per thousand population. - - 4 - ~ 3.J- - .. '. ;. ., . 0.. ";.:. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES .....:. 12. HOW WILL THE CITY UPGRADE THE MONTGOMERY AREA WITH THE REVENUES GENERATED IN THE AREA AFTER ANNEXATION? The City will work with the. Montgomery Planning Com~ittee to establish a multi-year phased capital improvement program aimed a;' upgrading public facilities in the area such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, roads, drainage systems, and parks. The total cost of the program is expected to exceed $12 million with the City using Gas Tax Funds, Community Development Block Grant funds, general funds, and other sources to finance the capital improvements. The City intends to spend three to five times as much as the County currently does on annual capital improvements. The County has agreed that any Community Development Block Grant proj ects funded pri or to annexati on and under constructi on . wi 11 be completed by the County. . Assessment districts can also be formed for street improvements if desired by the community. However, for at least ten years after the effective date of the annexati on, the City Council will not fonn an assessment di stri ct in the r~ontgomery area for street improvements (curbs, gutters, sidewalks, or pavement) unless property owners. representing at least 2/3 of the area in the proposed district support its formation. 13. WHAT LEVEL OF STREET MAINTENANCE WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? , ." Overall street maintenance will improve upon annexation, since the City's maintenance standards are considerab)y higher than the County's. Potholes will be repaired more frequently, streets will be resurfaced more frequently, and shoulders on unimproved streets will be bladed (leveled) more frequently. The City will extend its "chip seal" program, which has received nationwide acclaim, to roads in the area. Major streets will be chip sealed every 8 to 10 years and local streets every 15 to 20 years. In addition, the City will upgrade and .expand its existing synchronized (computerized) traffic signal system into the area, which currently does not have synchronized traffic signals. 14. WHAT LEVEL OF SlREET SWEEPING WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE AREA UPON . ANNEXATION? The City will provide the same level of street sweeping services provided to the rest of the City. Streets in residential areas will be swept twice a month and streets in commercial areas three times a week. Street sweeping is currently not provided in the area on any regular schedule. - 5 - /" :'33 - . . : .-.' , . '. " 15. WILL THE CITY'S STREET TREE PROGRAM BE EXTENDED INTO THE AREA UPON ANNEXATION? ..---. - The City, which has been designated a MTree Ci ty'~USA. each of the last five years, will extend its street tree program into the area. The City will trim all street and parle trees on a regular basis. Street trees in the area are cOrrently trimmed only when hazardous conditions require it. 16. HOW WIll STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE IN THE AREA BE AFFECTED BY ANNEXATION? Storm drain construction will be accelerated, drainage maintenance improved, and flooding potential decreased. A comprehensive drainage plan and capital improvement program will be developed for the area as has been done for the rest of the City. The City will expend approximately $4 million following annexation as its share of the Telegraph Canyon Channel improvement to be constructed with the U. S. Corps of Engineers. 17. WHAT WIll HAPPEN TO THE MONTGOMERY SEWER DISTRICT AND TO SEWER FEES UPON ANNEXATION? . There will be no change in regular sewer service charges for the near future. On July 1, 1986, the Montgomery Sanitation (Sewer) District will be dissolved and the City will talee over sewer maintenance. ...... Montgomery Sewer District reserves will be placed in a separate account and used to maintain and benef.it the existing Montgomery sewer system. The sewer connection fee will be reduced from $1,000 to $300 per single family dwelling. As Montgomery Sewer District reserves are depleted, the City will review existing Montgomery sewer service and sewer connection charges and may establi sh .new charges that reflect the maintenance costs and charges for the City-wide system. 18. WHAT WIU- HAPPEN TO THE STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT AND RElATED FEES UPON ANNEXATION? , The City will assume responsibility for street lighting in the area within a year of annexation, and the area will be removed from the County's Streetlight District. At that time, the. City will pay for street lighting, and residents and businesses in the area will no longer be required to pay a special street lighting fee. - 6 - -, --- :3 t./ --- ." . ., . ,. ." - ,} .... '. 'T;. ". E. FISCAL ISSUES - 19. HOW WILL TAXES AND FEES CHANGE FOR AREA RESIDENTS UPON ANNEXATION? To show how annexation to Chula Vista might affect the taxes and fees Montgomery residents are currently paying, the following list has been developed as representative of the most common relevant costs to area residents: -. ITEM : CHULA VISTA CDUNTY Property Taxes a of assessed val ue a of assessed value Bonded Indebtedness(a) $3.41 per year until 1990 (based on $75,000 house) -0- Street Lighting Fee Sewer Service Charge(b) -0- $15 per year $39 per year Sewer Connection Fee $64.80 per year (would not apply to Montgomery) $300 per dwelling unit $1,000 per dwelling unit Utility Users Tax(C) Approx. $30 per year (certain exemptions are available) -0- -" Trash Serv;ce(d) $73.20 per year (would not $89.40 per year automatically apply to I~ontgomery) Dog Licenses 1 Year 2 Years $ 9 $14 $16.50 $23 Development Fees Generally the same or higher in the County than in the City .. (a) Chula Vista's Police Building bonds would cost $3.41 per year for a homeowner with a house assessed at $75,000. When these bonds are paid off in 1990. this charge will be eliminated. ' (b) The Montgomery sewer service charge would not be increased in the near future after annexation. as explained in Question 18. (c) The City offers senior citizens (age 62 or older) with incomes of. $7500 or less an exemption from this tax. which is based on gas, electric, and phone usage. If qualified senior citizens are on a master meter for gas and electric, they can receive a $12 rebate and the regular exemption for the tax on phone usage. (d) The cost of trash service in the ar~a would no1: au~"m",t.ical1v h.. - _3S- . ., .- ~ ~.) '. : 20. IF THE AREA DECIDES TO ANNEX. HOW WILL THE CITY USE REVENUES FROM THE AREA? . .' """" Revenues generated in ~Iontgomery will be spent in Montgomery to provide the area with the same level of municipal'. services as the rest of the City and to provide for an extensive capital improvement program to upgrade public facfl ities in the area such as curbs. gutters. sidewalks. roads. drainage systems. and parts: The area currently is flaying significantly more in taxes and fees than .:it is receiving in services and capital improvements. . The County uses its surpl:Js revenue!. fr"m the area to provide services and programs in other parts of the County. F. MISCELLANEOUS 21. HOW WILL ANNEXATION AFfECT EXISTING TRASH SERVICE TO THE AREA? Area residents wil~ rel:eive the level of trash service currently provided by the Sanitary Service. This level of service is guaranteed to be delivered by the State Government Code for a minimum of five years after annexation or until such time as the existing franchise holder sells his franchise. The City will attempt to renegotiate the. existing trash collection fees in the area to the same. lower rate currently paid by Chula Vista res~dents. 22. HOW WILL THE CITY'S MOBILEHOME RElIT MEDtATION PROCESS APPLY TO THE AREA UPON ANNEXATIGN? ~ The Ci ty' s Mobil ehome SpO!ce Rent Medi ati on Ordi nance wfl 1 become effective in the area upon annexation. The County has no similar procedures for negotiating dis?uted rent increases in mobflehome parks. The City's ordinance provides th~t ~hen a ~umulative rent increase in a calendar year exceeds the previous :2 months' residential rent component of the Consunler Price Index. a negotiation/mediation process may be initiated if a ma~or~ty of a ~erk's residents sign a petition disputing the ,'ent increase. The process requires participation by both par-ties in the negotiation and mediation process. The results of the process are not binding. In addition. the City has establish~d a Mobilehome Issues Committee. which is composed of jlark owners and park residents. The COl1l11ittee meets monthly to discuss issues related to mobf1ehome l1fe and to advise the City Council on such issues. - 8 - -. .. .-~~-- .. .~.... . - , ' . . '. . 23. WHAT EFFECT WILL ANNEXATION OF l1IE AREA HAVE UPON. l1IE EXISTING COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - ZONES 3 & 4 AND THE COUNTY SERVICE AREAS: NO. 42 (ZONES A & B)-WOODLAWN PARK; NO. 62-MONTGOMERY PARKS; NO. 66-VALLEY AVENUE; AND NO. 98-DATE COURT? ' _. County Service Areas No. 42, 62, 66 and 98 will be dissolved upon annexation and the City will assume responsibfl i ty. Simil arly, the area will be removed from the County Fl ood Control Di stri ct and the City will assume responsibility. G. SPECIAL TRANSITION PROCESSES 24. WHEN WILL l1IE ANNEXATION BECOME EFFECTIVE AND HOW WILL THE TRANSITION FROM l1IE COUNTY TO l1IE CITY BE HANDLED? If the citizens of the area currentlY within the Montgomery Fire Protection District vote on November 5, 1985 to annex to Chula Vista, the annexation will become effective by the end of December 1985. In order to provide the area with . the. same level of municipal services as the rest of Chu1a Vista, the City win hire many additional staff and purchase a significant amount of equipment. To, provide adequate time to obtain this staff and equipment, the City may contract with the County to continue providing some services for a few months. By 'July 1, 1986, however, the City intends to provide virtually all municipal services to the area, as described previously in this document. - To help insure a smooth transition of the area into Chu1a Vista, the City will also provide several other special processes. The Montgomery Planning Committee will be established as an advisory committee to the Planning Commission and City Council for the area. The C01lU1littee will formulate a recommended Conrnunity Plan, provide reconrnendations for all types of land use applications filed in the area, and help develop a multi-year capital improvement program to upgrade public facilities in the area. The- City also will temporarily add one qualified member, to be appointed from the MOjitgomery area, to each of the City's twelve non-Charter established advisory boards and conrnissions. Jhe number of members on these advisory boards and conrnissions would revert to .the previous number when the member appointed from the Montgomery area could be assimilated within the regular number of members. The City Council holds meetings in Chula Vista's Civic Center on the first four Tuesdays of every month. The meeting on the first Tuesday of each month is held at 4:00 p.m. and the other regular meetings are at 7:00 p.m. One portion of each meeting is devoted to Oral C01IU1Iunications, when members of the audience are invited ,to address the Council on items of concern to them. This forum will provide an additional opportunity to help insure that the City meets the needs of new as well as current Chula Vista residents. '" ~ '31-- WPC 07121 RESOLUTION 1309 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE REVISED ROLE AND FUNCTION FOR THE TOWN CENTRE, OTAY VALLEY, AND SOUTHWEST PROJECT AREA COMMITTEES, AND INCORPORATING SAME INTO THE NEXT ITERATION OF THE RESPECTIVE REDEVELOPMENT PLANS WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista and the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency has formed three Project Area Committees pursuant to Health and Safety Code Sections 33385 through 33388; and, WHEREAS, the State mandated requirements for the formation and existence of Project Area Committees expire upon the third anniversary of the adoption of the respective Redevelopment Plans; and, WHEREAS, the State mandated requirements have expired for the Town Centre and Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area Committees; and the State mandated requirements will expire for the Southwest Project Area Committee in December 1993; and, WHEREAS, on October 12, 1992, the City Council approved a motion to accept responsibility for developing a consensus on the future role and function of the three Project Area Committees and to form a reviewing group for this purpose; and WHEREAS, the purpose of redefining the role and function of the Project Area Committees is to streamline the development project review process in order to avoid unnecessary levels of review, and reduce time and cost to the City and applicant; and WHEREAS, recommended revised Project Area Committee Role and Functions are submitted to the Council and Agency on March 16, 1993, (Attached as Exhibits A-I, A-2, and A-3); and, WHEREAS, the Role and Fllnction descriptions are to supersede and replace any and all Project Area Committee By-Laws as previously adopted. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, determine, and resolve as follows: 1. The Town Centre and Otay Valley Project Area Committees' formulating action will be reviewed and if needed, amended to ensure any State mandates are deleted. 2. City staff will prepare the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area Committee's formulating Ordinance amendment so that upon completion of the third year, all reference to State mandates will be deleted. - ? f --. - 1 RESOLUTION 1309 Page 2 3. The Redevelopment Agency approves the Role and Function of the Project Mea Committees as presented in Exhibits A-I, A-2, and A-3, attached hereto, and as though fully set forth herein, with direction to the City Clerk and City Attorney to update the Boards and Cnnzmissions Handbook and provide specific legal form required by this action. .' 4. By-laws will be deleted from use as soon as the Role and Function statements become effecitve as herein provided in conjunction with the fulI use of the Boards and Cnnzmissions Handbook, which will be updated pursuant to this action. 5. The Role and Function of the Town Centre and Otay Valley Project Area Committees will be as described in Exhibits A-I and A-2 respectfulIy effective upon adoption of this resolution. 6. The Role and Function of the Southwest Project Area Committee will be as described in Exhibit A-3 effective upon their first meeting after December 31, 1993. 7. The Role and Function of alI three (3) Project Area Committees as described in Exhibits A-I, A-2, A-3 wilI be incorporated in the next iteration of the respective Redevelopment Plans. Submitted by Approved by Bruce M. Boogaard Agency General Counsel Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and Community Development Director ~ (C:\WPSlIBAYNES\DOCUMEN1\PACROLES.BES1 -'37- ORDINANCE NO._ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REPEALING SECTION 2.48.200 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE THEREBY DISSOLVING THE MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, in response to a permit st'"eamlining recommendation of the Chuia Vista Economic Development Commission, appointed a two-member Council Subcommittee on October 6, 1992, for the purpose of reviewing the "forming ordinances" and developing a consensus regarding the future disposition of the Montgomery Planning Committee; and, WHEREAS, the Council Subcommittee was unable to reach consensus and requested that staff prepare a report outlining the advantages and disadvantages for each of four options described by the Subcommittee; and, WHEREAS, the City Council voted in favor of Option 2 in the August 17,1993, staff report thereby directing staff to dissolve the Montgomery Planning Committee and determining the process by which the remaining members of the Montgomery Planning Committee could be seated on the Southwest Project Area Committee; and, WHEREAS, the City Council set and duly noticed the public hearing on November 2, 1993, for the purpose ofrepealing Section 2.48.200 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code to effectuate the Council direction of August 17, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as was advertised, namely 4:00 p.m. on November 2, 1993, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was hereafter closed. NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby fmd, order, determine and resolve that Section 2.48.200 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is repealed thereby dissolving the Montgomery Planning Committee. PRESENTED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Robert A. Leiter Planning Director Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney C:\WP51 IHA YNESIIJOCUMENTIMPCDISSO.ORD _ ;/- c:) - ITEM TITLE: ~ SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Meeting Date Item gr 1/9)13 Public Hearing: Consideration of the following request by American Stores Inc. for 5.8 acres located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "J" Street: a) GPA-93-06: Amend General Plan from Professional and Administrative Office to Retail Commercial b) PCZ-93-E: Rezone from C-O (Commercial Office) and R-l (Single Family) to C-C (Central Commercial) Resolution / 7,7.?3 Amending the Land Use Diagram of the General Plan from Professional and Administrative Commercial to Retail Commercial for 5.8 acres located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "J" Street. ~~ _t>'i)O~/ Ordinance >>77 Amending the ~~ map or maps established by Section 19.18.010 of the Chula ,~&'Municipal Code, rezoning the 5.8 acres located at the southwe~l'her of Third Avenue and "J" Street from C-O, Office Commer~ ibid R-l, Single Family Residential to C-C-P, Central commerGb~ecise Plan. 7# Director of Planning M~ -it City Manager &-{~ f.J (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.lO The applicant, American Stores Properties, Inc., parent company of the Lucky stores, has submitted applications to amend the General Plan and rezone 5.8 acres at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "J" Street. The proposal is to redesignate the site from Professional and Administrative Office to Retail Commercial, and to rezone the site from C-O Commercial Office and R-l Single Family to C-C Central Commercial. The proposal reflects an intention by Lucky to relocate from their existing site at the northwest comer of Third and "J" into a new, larger facility on the southwest comer. The property is currently occupied by the First United Methodist Church which intends to relocate to a new facility on East "H" Street at Paseo Ranchero. rt 0-/ ~~ Page 2, Item / 1/ Meeting Date /2/93 ~ /J } The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-93-42, of potential environmental impacts associated with the project. Based on the attached Initial Study and comments thereon, the Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded that any potentially significant environmental impacts can be mitigated to a level of insignificance and, therefore, recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-42. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt .the resolution and ordinance amending the General Plan from Professional and Administrative Commercial to Retail Commercial, and rezoning from C-O and R-l to C-C- P, 5.8 acres located on the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "I" Street. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On October 13, 1993, the Planning Commission voted 5-1-1 (Salas against; Tuchscher abstained due to conflict of interest) to approve the applicant's request and recommend that the City Council amend the General Plan and Rezone 5.8 acres located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "I" Street in accordance with the draft City Council resolution and ordinance (minutes attached). On October 11, 1993, the Resource Conservation Commission approved the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-43 by a 4-1 vote (Guerreiro voting against). See attached minutes. PUBUC INPUT On December 8, 1992, the applicant held an independent public forum on the project, and on August 4, 1993, the Planning Department held a second public forum at the First United Methodist Church. A summary of the issues raised at both forums and correspondence received by the Planning Department is included in the "Public Input" attachment to this report. Both the Planning Commission and City Staff are satisfied that the issues raised by the area residents have been resolved by the recommended Precise Plan Standards. DISCUSSION: The 5.8 acre site is rectangular in shape and is located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "I" Street. It presently contains a church sanctuary, assembly hall, meeting rooms, classrooms, parking and a single family dwelling at the northwest comer of the parcel. The property also contains an area which the Chula Vista Post Office presently leases to accommodate its current employee parking demand. The Postmaster is presently investigating the possibility of relocating the employee parking to a parcel located immediately adjacent to the south. ~ O",;z Page 3, Item If ~ Meeting Dat~ 1/ i ~ The site is bounded to the west by single family dwellings, to the south by the Post Office and Masonic Lodge, to the north across "J" Street by the present Lucky store and a condominium complex, and to the east by various professional offices (see Land Use Map). Present zoning is as follows: Site c-o Office Commercial R-I Single Family Residential North C-C Central Commercial R-3 Multi-Family Residential South c-o Office Commercial East C-O Office Commercial West R-I Single Family Residential (See Zoning Map) General Plan land use designations are as follows: Site Professional and Administrative office North Retail Commercial/Low Medium Density Residential South Retail Commercial/Medium High Density Residential East Professional and Administrative Commercial West Low Medium Density Residential (see General Plan map). Lucky presently leases the 1.5 acre site and a 45,000 sq, ft. building across "J" Street directly to the north. Their present site and building are, by today's standards, outdated. The new facility would involve a 60,000 sq. ft. building on 5.8 acres to serve the same market area, according to Lucky. Lucky has prepared a preliminary conceptual plan which was presented at the public forums and which has been included with this report. However, they have not fmalized a site plan or architecture. A number of residents in attendance at the City initiated public forum appeared to favor a new store, but expressed concerns about hours of operation, noise and fumes generated by delivery activities, and the proximity of the truck driveway to the residences located immediately adjacent to the west. They also expressed concerns with certain operational aspects associated with the existing store, which include the noise associated with a cardboard box compactor and the smell and litter associated with trash bins. Concerns were also expressed regarding the history of accidents at the 3rd and "J" intersection and the ability of "J" Street to carry additional traffic generated by a larger new store. ~ ??~ J ~8'" Page 4, Item /. ) I Meeting Date 1/2/93 'j"} /J J ANALYSIS The issues raised with respect to the proposed change from office to retail commercial include (1) the need to retain office commercial acreage versus the need for more retail commercial acreage in the area, and (2) the compatibility of retail commercial with adjoining uses, particularly the residential area adjoining the site to the west. In regard to the issue of office versus retail commercial acreage, the City as a whole, excluding Planned Community Districts, contains over 72 acres of vacant or under developed office commercial property, and over 125 acres of vacant or underdeveloped retail commercial property. The Third A venue commercial corridor also contains a significant amount of underdeveloped retail and office commercial property. Thus, there does not appear to be a general unmet need or demand for either office or retail commercial, either on a city-wide basis or in the iminediate area. The most important factor with regard to need or demand, however, it not the total available acres, but the suitability of a particular property for a particular use. In this case, the site is one of the few if not the only commercial sites available on Third A venue which is large enough and of such a shape to accommodate a major retail user. In addition, the change will allow Lucky to upgrade and modernize, and continue to serve the same market area. In a general sense, smaller sites are suitable for most office projects, whereas larger-scale retail development needs added site depth to meet parking and building designs. Also, the General Plan and zoning pattern along both sides of Third Avenue between "E" and "L" Streets is predominantly retail commercial with the exception of the office commercial areas between "R" and Kearney Streets, which includes the site in question. The vast majority of these commercial frontages adjoin both single and multiple family residential areas. Thus, a redesignationlrezoning is not inconsistent with either the general pattern of uses or the relationship of uses established on and around Third Avenue. , With respect to the issue of compatibility, ideally retail commercial districts are physically separated from single family residential uses by significant physical features including slopes, streets, and/or open spaces, and transitional uses such as lower impact commercial uses (such as offices) and/or higher density residential uses. Since the property is presently occupied by a church which, due to building locations, has a relatively low impact on the adjacent residential area, development of the site with either office or retail use will have a higher impact than presently experienced, and retail activity has a greater potential for adverse impacts than office use based on traffic, noise and hours of operation. These potential impacts are identified in the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. ~ ~~'f Page 5, Item // /~Ir Meeting Date ~ /~)' J A Traffic Study was conducted to compare the traffic volumes and level of service associated with the existing church facility versus three development scenarios: the development of general offices under the existing planning and zoning; the Lucky proposal; and the development of general retail uses assuming the site is replanned and rezoned but not occupied by Lucky: Daily Peak Level of Land Use Intensity Trips Hr. Service Trips Church Existing 1,009 144 B Office' 150,000 sq. ft. 2,550 255 B Lucky 60,000 sq. ft. 2,340 187 B Retail' 95,000 sq. ft. 3.705 296 B 'Estimated maximum intensity As indicated in the table, daily trips in and out of the site could be expected to increase by 132 % with the Lucky proposal, 153% with office development at maximum intensity under the existing planning and zoning, and 267 % with general retail development at maximum intensity under the proposed planning and zoning. In all cases, however, the level of service at Third Avenue and "J" Street remains at LOS "B", which is above the City's LOS "C" Threshold Standard ("A" is best, "F" is worst). It should also be noted that the peak. hour trips are only marginally higher for the Lucky proposal as compared with the existing church, and significantly less than office development at maximum intensity, because of the differences in the distribution of trips between the uses. The Study also reviewed accident data for the intersection of Third Avenue and "J" Street (19 accidents over a 34 month period). It found that although this number of accidents is not atypical for an urban intersection, the characteristics of the accidents, as well as field observations of restricted left turn movements, indicate the need to add left turn phasing to the signals at the intersection. This has been included as a requirement for development under the precise plan standards. The recommendations of the Study with regard to the Lucky conceptual site plan have also been included in the precise plan standards. A Noise Study was also conducted to determine potential noise impacts from traffic as well as from operational aspects of the Lucky proposal. The marginal increase in traffic is not expected to result in an adverse noise impact. Several aspects of the Lucky conceptual plan were found to mitigate noise impacts, including separation and orientation of loading facilities away from residences, and the construction of a landscaped six-foot bock wall along the westerly boundary. These aspects, as well as the following recommended measures from the studies (or more stringent variations thereot) have been included in the precise plan standards: ~ 0--5 ......_;€?' Meeting Date 2/93 1?f.J 1. No delivery truck traffic shall occur in the alley between the rear of the store and the nearest homes from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. 2. No truck/trailers shall be parked m C".e alley with any mechanical equipment such as refrigerator/freezer units running during the time from 10 p.m. - 7 a.m. 3. The trash compactor shall not be operated between the hours from 10 p.m. - 7 a.m., Monday through Friday, 10 p.m. - 8 a.m. on Saturdays, and 10 p.m. - 9 a.m. on Sundays and holidays. 4. Refuse or recycled cardboard trucks shall not collect waste materials during those times when operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited. In addition to the measures recommended by the Traffic and Noise Studies, the staff has recommended several precise plan standards which we believe would further ensure compatibility between the neighbors and the Lucky Store or any other use that would occupy the site if for whatever reason, the Lucky facility were not constructed. These standards include limitations on floor area, building size, and site and truck access, as well as parameters for loading, storage, and service access and equipment. These standards are listed in the draft City Council Ordinance. CONCLUSION The proposal is consistent with the established land use patterns and relationships along the balance of the Third A venue commercial corridor. Furthermore, while there does not appear to be a shortage of either commercial office or retail commercial acreage in the area, there is a shortage of large, rectangular sites to accommodate a relocation, expansion and modernization of Lucky, or other larger retail development in the area. The redesignation from office to retail use does have the potential to create greater friction with residential areas to the west and northwest. However, the apparent advantage to the surrounding community of a new l!ll'ger grocery store (or perhaps retaining a grocery store which would otherwise relocate out of the area) in combination with safeguards established in the form of precise plan standards to address the potential impacts, leads staff to recommend approval of the requests in accordance with the fmdings and subject to the requirements contained in the attached resolution and ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT: The expansion of commercial land use will generate additional revenues through an increase in sales tax and property tax. The land in question is currently tax exempt (existing Church). (f: \bomolplanninaUucky .113) ~ cYr-? 7. Building Maximum Height: 28 ft. Building Setbacks: West - 40 ft. South - 0 "J" St. - 15 ft. Third Avenue - 15 ft. 8. A 20 ft. landscaping buffer featuring tall vertical elements (trees) shall be provided along the west property line. 9. All parking spaces shall be screened by landscaping buffer equal in width to the building setback. 10. All trash enclosures, storage of merchandise, mechanical or recycling equipment or machines shall be located within the building. 11. Delivery and service doors, and any outdoor working area shall be oriented away from the westerly adjacent residential neighborhood.. 12. Loading docks shall be oriented away from the westerly adjacent residential area and buffered with parts of the building andlor wing walls equal in height to truck height. . 13. Driveway entrances shall be unencumbered for the following distances as measured from the public curb to any driveway or park space: Third Ave. - 60 ft. minimum "J" St. - 40 ft. minimum 14. Business identification signs shall be limited to the building mounted and one monument type sign at each major entry along Third and "J" St. Note: Signs along J St. shall be non illuminated or to an indirectly lighted or one maximum sign area 30 sq. ft. (maximum area sign). 15. Signage on the building shall be limited to the east elevation and shall be no larger than one sq. ft. per lineal feet of building frontage. 16 . All roof mounted equipment shall be screened from view. 17. A tree survey and evaluation shall be conducted and considered as part of the landscape and irrigation design. Trees shall not be removed without authorization from the City's Planning Director. 18. The zoning wall along the west property line shall be between 6 and 9 ft. in height as may be specifically determined by the Zoning Administrator after meeting and conferring with the westerly adjacent property owners, and architecturally treated on both sides. ~~( 19. A lighting plan shall address security and avoid light spills over the westerly adjacent residential neighborhood. 20. 5 ft. wide street median shall be installed on Third Avenue south of the Third A venue and J intersection. designed and located to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 21. Left turn traffic signal phasing shall be installed at the Third Avenue and J Street intersection prior to issuance of the certificate of a occupancy. 22. Truck access driveway shall be closed with gates or bollards before and after permitted operating hours. 23. Development on this Yluy""ty must no net increase in water consumption and shall participate in whatever water conservation or fee offset program the City of Chula Vista may have in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 24. An exclusive right turn only lane on the west end of the Third Avenue and J Street eastbound shall be constructed as part of the overall development of the subject property. 25. A conceptual striping plan for the Third A venue and J Street intersection featuring right and left turn only lanes and a through lane on the west end of J Street (eastbound) shall be prepared and submitted to the City Engineer for consideration. SECTION V: This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption. Presented by Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning (f'_~\I293.930) J~/O PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION AND MINUTES ~ RESOLUTION NO. GPA-93-06 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN AND REZONE 5.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND J '3TREET FROM PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMERCIAL TO RETAIL; AND FROM C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) AND R-l (SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL) TO C-C-P (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL PRECISE PLAN) WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a General Plan Amendment and Rezoning were filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on December 2, 1992, by American Store properties, Inc. and WHEREAS, said application requested that the General Plan designation on approximately 5.8 acres located at the southwest corner of Third Avenue and J Street be changed from Professional and Administrative Commercial to Retail Commercial and that the existing zoning be changed from c-o (Office Commercial) and R-l (Single Family Residential) to C-C-P, Central Commercial Precise Plan zone, and WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said General Plan Amendment and Zone Change applications and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 21 days prior to the hearing, and WHEREAS, the General Plan Land Use Element has not been amended more than three (3) times this calendar year; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-43. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE Commission finds that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Program issued on IS-93-43. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission recommends that the City Council amend the General Plan and rezone 5.8 acres located at the southwest corner of Third A venue and "J" Street in accordance with the attached City Council resolution and Ordinance. -/- BE IT FURTHER RESOL VED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and to the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day 13th day of October, 1993 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Fuller, Martin, Moot, Ray, Tarantino NOES: Salas ABSENT: ABSTENTIONS: None Tuchscher Thomas A. Martin, Chairman X1 ~(~j% /l~i~~ Nancy Ri ey, Secr'etary WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\1354.93 . . - J-- PC Minutes -12- October 13, 1993 Excerot From 10/13/93 Minutes of Chula Vista Planning Commission Commissioner Tuchscher stated that he represented the First United Methodist Church in the purchase and sale of real estate and, therefore, had a fmancial interest in Item 2. He would disqualify himself from participation and leave the dais, due to a conflict of interest. ITEM 2. PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF THE FOLLOWING REQUESTS BY AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC. FOR 5.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND "J" STREET A) GP A-93-06: AMEND GENERAL PLAN FROM PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE TO RETAIL COMMERCIAL B) PCZ-93-E: REZONE FROM C-O (COMMERCIAL OFFICE) AND R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) TO C-C (CENTRAL COMMERCIAL) Associate Planner Hernandez presented the staff report. He noted the town meetings which had been held in December 1992 and August 1993, and stated that the issues raised at the town meetings had included parking lighting, hours of operation, noise generated by the commercial activity, traffic, trash enclosure aspects and smell, and other issues related to the physical development of the property. The issues were primarily due to the existing operation. Mr. Hernandez drew the Commission's attention to No.8 of the Precise Plan Guidelines relating to a 20' landscape buffer to be provided along the west property line. The buffer was intended to soften the visual impact which would be created by the building, and also screen the security lights that may be installed on that part of the building. Mr. Hernandez also noted that it was being required that trash enclosures be installed inside the building, as well as all the storage facilities, mechanical or recycling equipment, and machinery. All the service doors and delivery service areas would be located either on the east or south side of the building, and no activity would be allowed on the west side which faced the residential area. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-93-3, and adopt Resolutions GPA-93-06 and PCS-93-13 recommending that the City Council approve the General Plan Amendment and rezoning, subject to the Precise Plan Standards listed in the draft City Council resolution. Mr. Hernandez noted that Dan Marum of JHK, traffic consultant for the project, and Barbara Reid from the Environmental Section of the Planning Department were available for questions. Commissioner Fuller was concerned about access for people who would be using the shopping center by alternative modes of transportation. Was thought given to placing the store closer to Third A venue with the parking behind, additionally buffering the homes in the back from noise? Associate Planner Hernandez replied that the issue of locating the building at the northeast comer of the site was researched by the applicant, as the preferable location based upon the -3- PC Minutes -13- October 13, 1993 urban character of Third Avenue. However, there were also concerns regarding lighting and insecurity of locating the parking to the rear. Additionally, the size of the building would not physically adapt to the Third A venue location. If the applicant could have purchased the Masonic Lodge parcel, the Lucky market could have possibly been located near Third Avenue. Regarding hours of operation and curfew, Commissioner Tarantino asked if this was the standard curfew, or if it was determined based on the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Hernandez stated they were generally the hours of operation. Commissioner Ray questioned the limitation of delivery truck traffic and why the alley way could not be blocked altogether to any traffic. Assistant Planning Director Lee responded that the issue had been discussed at great length at the public forum, and staff had indicated to the residents that the issue had been explored with the applicant. However, providing access coming in to the front of the building and maneuvering near the southeast comer of the building and back into the loading area creates potential safety issues of trucks accessing continually in front of the store. Commissioner Ray, referring to Condition 5, noted that refuse or recycled cardboard trucks are prohibited from collecting waste materials during times which are outside of normal pick-up hours and raised the question as to why it was necessary to negotiate other than normal pick-up hours. Mr. Lee said that was another option, stating that it was unusual for a standard rezoning to set that many conditions in place to address requirements at the design stage, but staff felt it was important if they were going to move ahead with a General Plan amendment and rezoning that would potentially impact the adjacent residential area. In staff s opinion, having standards set in place would make the project compatible with the area. This was basically the plan that Lucky would like to proceed with, depending on some modifications, if necessary. Following up on Commissioner Fuller's question, Mr. Lee said that from staff's perspective, there were many reasons to have the building closer to Third Avenue to provide better interface with bus service and pedestrian movement, but in terms of marketability, the applicant was concerned about having parking in the rear. . Commissioner Fuller asked if the parking area could be designed so it could be made pedestrian friendly, having areas where pedestrians could walk safely on sidewalks and not have to be dodging cars. Mr. Lee said even if the building were set back to the west, a condition could be added to alert the Design Review Committee to look at the issue of pedestrian access both from Third Avenue and "J" Street. If the Commission wanted to strengthen a requirement for pedestrian-friendly access coming from those public street systems, it could be included. Commissioner Ray questioned Condition 14, the signage on the building, and asked how it related to discussions in previous meetings regarding a renovation of a business on "I" Street, and if it was the same condition as on that project. Mr. Lee replied that the project on "I" Street was in a commercial office zone, which is more restrictive. The subject property was set up for a typical retail commercial zone in terms of a central commercial zoning category. It . -4- PC Minutes -14- October 13, 1993 varies from 1 sq. ft. up to a maximum of 3 sq. ft. in that zone. In this project, staff was establishing signage at 1 sq. ft. maximum. Principal Planner Griffin explained that the previous project, being in a C-O zone, was allowed 50 sq. ft. maximum regardless of the dimensions of the building. Mr. Lee stated the proposed Lucky building was approximately 230 ft. across the front, which would equate to 230 sq. ft. of sign area which would be adequate to identify the building. Referring to Condition 19 regarding the 5' wide street median to be installed on Third Avenue, south of Third and "J", Commissioner Ray was concerned with the narrowness of "J" Street which was quite heavily traveled, and why there was no requirement for a median there and/or significant widening of the roadway. Mr. Lee said the purpose of the median on Third A venue was to preclude left-turn movements in and out of the property on the driveway closest to the Third and "J" intersection. Mr. Dan Marum, the traffic consultant for the City, concurred that the concern regarding the driveway on Third A venue was its proximity to the signalized intersection and the potential for left-turn movements into the site as other vehicles would be making a left turn at the intersection itself. On "J" Street, the first driveway accessing the site was set back far enough from the intersection that the conflict would be reduced, and would not be any closer to the intersection than the existing Lucky's driveway. Regarding widening of "J" Street, there was a requirement for an exclusive right-turn lane in the eastbound direction which was an improvement which had been recommended, which would create a geometric configuration in the eastbound direction which would be identical to the geometric configuration in the westbound direction on the other side of the intersection. There would be an exclusive left-turn lane in the eastbound direction, a through lane, and an exclusive right-turn lane. Commissioner Ray asked about the westbound lane with a vehicle turning left into the driveway- -would there be room enough to accommodate left turns and a through lane. Mr. Marum indicated that the specific geometrics had not been detailed out, and it was an item which should be reviewed at the next level by the design review team. Commissioner Ray was concerned that there was not some verbiage indicating that it would either be discussed or some specifics included for the westbound traffic. Mr. Hernandez recommended that a precise plan standard be added to the conditions as follows: "An exclusive right-turn-only lane on "J" Street for the eastbound to southbound movement be required. " Commissioner Salas asked if the recommended delivery hours were critical to the store or if the hours could be reduced so there could be more quiet time for the neighborhood. Mr. Lee asked that the representative from Lucky speak to that issue. --- ~6~ PC Minutes -15- October 13, 1993 This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Richard Williams, 4724 Matty Ct., La Mesa 91941, indicated his support for the project. Mickie Pruitt, 745 Glover Ave., CV 91910, supported the project. She wanted to have a choice. She believed the noise wo~ld be reduced; Lucky's had worked very hard for the neighborhood to alleviate any of their concerns. Allen Ashe, 543 Rivera St., CV 91911, representing the First United Methodist Church, gave the Church's vision for the community. He believed Lucky's had attempted every possibility to meet the needs of the community, and felt the City of Chula Vista would be very proud of the project when completed. Jim Hirsch, of FORMA Design, 8910 University Center Lane, SD, representing American Stores, parent company for Lucky supermarkets, discussed the town meetings and the comments made by the community. They studied a variety of alternate plans with consideration given to moving the building to the front of the site. At the time, they were in negotiations with the Lodge to see if they could obtain that property; however, they were not successful. Without that land, it was impossible to place the building at the front of the site because of traffic circulation. He proceeded to discuss the other issues considered. They believed the plan being presented was the best alternative for the site and concurred with the staff recommendation to approve the GPA and rezone. He noted the design review, within the Precise Plan process, would be brought back before the Commission when they would be considering the finer points of pedestrian-friendly access, etc. Mr. Hirsch introduced Chris Huss, Sr. Vice President, and Pat Sinn, the area real estate manager from American Stores, who were available for questions. Assistant Planning Director Lee clarified that the Precise Plan would only go before the Design Review Committee and would only come before the Planning Commission on appeal. It would be subject to a public hearing, but it was the Design Review Committee's decision. Charlotte Helms, 805 Floyd Ave., CV 91910, noted her support for the project. Dennis Ginoza, 874 Entrada Place, CV 91910, Pastor of the First United Methodist Church, spoke in favor of the project. At the last town meeting, there had been many concerns and comments regarding the need for a larger store in the area. He believed the applicant was listening to all sides. Evita Beas McCullough, 773 Church Ave., CV 91910, supported the project. The present Lucky store was inadequate, and the new store would help revitalize the neighborhood. Patrick Barajas, 375 "J" Street, CV, was concerned about trucks coming in from Los Angeles, using "J" Street as a truck route. Police did not enforce the "no trucks" signs. He asked if there would be left-turn signals on Third and "J". Mr. Hernandez said that had been - to- PC Minutes -16- October 13, 1993 recommended. Mr. Barajas was concerned that only one or two cars going north on Third Avenue could turn west on "J" Street. He supported the project and felt the store would be a benefit. Commissioner Fuller asked where the trucks were supposed to access off 1-5. Mr. Barajas stated that trucks coming off 1-5 were supposed to turn on "J" to either south or north on Broadway but some keep going straight through. The designated truck routes were on "H" Street and "L" Street. Commissioner Ray asked if there was anything the City could do to prohibit that truck traffic if it continued. Mr. Lee stated it was a police enforcement matter; the area was posted. Staff would pass it on to the Police Department. Commissioner Ray asked how many calls would have to be made before action was taken. Mr. Lee said that would have to be researched and returned to the Planning Commission. Mr. Barajas said he had contacted the Police Department many times, and was told that only motorcycle police could issue tickets to the trucks. He hardly ever saw motorcycle police in the neighborhood. There was further discussion as to whether or not the trucks could be stopped by other police, and staff assured Mr. Barajas that the Police Department would be contacted and the matter would be discussed. Jack Fry, 345-B "J" Street, CV 91910, Treehaven Condominiums, representing the homeowners, supported the project. Staff had addressed their concerns. Mr. Fry said he was a retired Chula Vista police officer, and he assured Mr. Barajas that those in the police cars could write tickets, also. Elsie Brink, 1115 Ocala Ave., CV 91911, said that coming from the south by the post office, she had to make a left-hand turn and then make a "U" turn to mail letters, or make a left-hand turn to go into the post office. Sometimes traffic was very thick, and it was impossible to make a turn. She was concerned with the proximity of the post office to the comer. She felt the change in zoning would increase the buses and trucks in the area. Ms. Brink was against the project. Mae Neumann, 735 Garrett Ave., CV 91910, said the area was designated R-I, and she thought it should remain R-l. The community still needed churches, and houses should be built instead of Lucky's. The owner had attended the last meeting, and said it would still be a grocery store. The community did not need more grocery stores; they could fmd a better location. She was also concerned with the truck noise. _ f'J~ PC Minutes -17- October 13, 1993 Jack Gardner, Jr., 3535 First Avenue, San Diego, said he had built the original Lucky Store, who had been excellent tenants. He was concerned with heavy traffic on "J" Street. They did not want a divider on "J" Street, so east/west traffic could still go into their property on "J" Street. Another market would raise the traffic impact, and they wanted to be sure the eastbound traffic could go into their property, and the westbound traffic on "J" Street could still turn in. Commissioner Fuller asked if the current Lucky store would remain. Mr. Gardner said their lease with Lucky was for another three years, which would terminate .when this project was approved and completed in approximately 2 to 2-112 years. He was concerned with access to the current site of the Lucky store, so whatever went in after Lucky left. Answering Commissioner Fuller, Mr. Gardner said there were no defmite plans as to what would go there. Assistant Planning Director Lee clarified that Mr. Gardner's concern was that if there were traffic problems arising from left-turn movements and the City wanted to place a median there to preclude that, it could be a problem for Mr. Gardner's property. Mr. Lee said that a median would be one solution; and that a left-turn lane was another solution which would require additional road widening. Those were normally the first kinds of solutions that would be considered. His concern was one that staff could not respond to until such time as there was a user and a further analysis of the traffic situation. The first solution would be to try to come up with a continuous left-turn slot. It would be difficult to try to place a median there with access to the existing condominium project as well. Kenneth Ham, 724 Garrett Ave., CV 91910, disagreed with building a Lucky store on the site. He preferred that the Church remain. He felt there would be more graffiti with a Lucky store than with a church. He was concerned with diesel fumes going into the back yards. He was opposed to the Church being tom down. He felt the Church was more of a positive influence in the community. There had not been an increase in population to warrant a new store. He asked that the Commission vote against the proposal. Don Volk, 729 Garrett Ave., CV 91910, said he lives behind the proposed site, and he was concerned about the noise pollution that would come not only from the proposed site, but also from the post office. By changing the zoning, the whole neighborhood would be changed, and he was concerned about health hazards from diesel and other exhaust fumes coming into the neighborhood. He felt there were health concerns which should be addressed. Pat Michaels, 303 Via Bissolotti, CV 91910, said that the Church body had voted to move, and this would take place at some point in time when the land was sold. If it was not sold to Lucky's, it would be sold to someone else. It was not an issue as to whether the Church was going to move; it was a matter of whether Lucky's would be allowed to open a store. She spoke to that as a member of the Church. As a member of the community, she agreed with Mrs. Pruitt regarding the limited number of supermarkets in the area. She said she took 90% of her shopping dollar to I.B. and National City, because she shopped around where she did her -<6' ~- PC Minutes -18- October 13, 1993 grocery shopping. The current Lucky's store and Vons had inadequate parking; the Big Bear was an inadequate store. This would be a new and quieter store. She supported the project. Walter Neumann, 735 Garrett, CV, said he had made a suggestion to the store to change the truck loading dock from the south side of the building to the north end of the building because of the exhaust from the diesels. With the diesel stack being 8' to 9' tall, there was no way to stop the fumes with a 6' fence. Matt Henderson, 715 Garrett, CV, said that the 6' fence was a City limit and could not be raised. They had proposed that Lucky ask for an 8' fence, along with the 20' abutment for the foliage. He felt an 8' fence would take care of the exhaust fumes. He was in favor of the project, which would give the community somewhere else to shop. He felt the proposed plan was a good one; the trucks would not be coming in the back; the times for delivery were at the request of the neighbors; he was satisfied with the pedestrian-friendly access; did not feel there was a problem with buses; the traffic issues would be worked out. Jack Fry, of Treehaven Home Owners Association, reapproached the podium. He said the Treehaven Home Owners lived closer to the present Lucky's than any other neighbor in the area. When they moved in the area in 1973, the current wall was a grape stake fence. Treehaven residents had contacted Lucky, and they had put in a block wall fence. There had been a lot of noise which had been brought to the attend of Lucky's and they had tried to mitigate it. Regarding diesel smoke, the truck drivers turn off the trucks as soon as they are parked. He felt all the noise would be abated, and the residents would enjoy the new store. Chris Huss, Sr. Vice President of American Stores, parent company to Lucky, pointed out that this was a very preliminary design and would have to go through the design process. City staff would be addressing both the pedestrian access to the center and the truck traffic, and applicant would be working with them. Regarding the hours, they had been limited per the neighbors' requests concerning the hours the store would be open as well as being serviced. Regarding the height of the wall in the back, it would be discussed by the Design Review Committee, and Lucky would go along with the recommendations of the Committee and the neighbors' desires. Commissioner Ray asked for a comparison between the Advantage Store in National City and the proposed project. Mr. Huss said the Advantage Store had approximately 67,000 sq. ft. floor space. The Lucky store would have approximately 60,000 sq. ft. floor space. Commissioner Ray also asked for a comparison of the parking allocation. Mr. Huss said the Lucky store would have more parking but did not recall the ratio. They wanted as much open visibility in the front with as much parking as there could possibly be in the back. Chair Martin questioned why it was important to have the parking lot on the main street. Mr. Huss answered that today in the retail market, there needed to be visibility and good access to the center. If not, the parking is hidden, and there is a security problem. - q~ PC Minutes -19- October 13, 1993 Chair Martin asked if any thought had been given to locating the store next to the Masonic Lodge. The parking would still be on the north side. Mr. Huss said it had been considered, but there was a problem with depth and the parking. Commissioner Moot queried how long the project had been in the planning process before it came before the Commission. Mr. Huss said it had probably been 1-1/2 years, but the!e were other circumstances involved which delayed it because of the Church's relocation. No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Assistant Planning Director Lee responded to two conditions which had been brought up during the public hearing. Regarding the potential for having the loading area at the north end instead of the south. Staff had discussed that with the applicant, but the concerns were: proximity to residential development across the street, and conflict with the entry driveway. With the loading area in the south, there was a limited conflict with any parking area. Regarding the height of the zoning wall, Mr. Lee said that the 6' high zoning wall was the minimum height, and both through Zoning Administrator approval and/or the Precise Plan, the height could be increased. The residents needed to get together, if they felt comfortable with a higher wall, to decide if it should be a 7' or 8' wall. It would have impact on light and air for some residents. It could be addressed during the design review process, and a higher wall could be installed. Regarding Condition No. 18, Commissioner Ray asked what type of lighting would be used for security purposes during off hours of the store. Other stores had lighting 24 hours a day; would this be the same or would there be a fluctuation of lighting intensity. Mr. Lee said that would be an issue as the project got into the actual design of the project. The City has Codes covering that particular issue as far as lighting; they would not allow glare going into the residential area; if they are installed and there is glare, any complaints are responded to and the lights have to be adjusted. This condition was more of a flag to the applicant. Commissioner Ray asked if there was a trade-off regarding the potential for vandalizing occurring in the alley way at the rear of the store versus the lighting issue if the lights were turned off. Mr. Lee replied that lights would more likely be redirected than turned off. Regarding the buffer area to the west of the property, Commissioner Ray questioned the maintenance of the landscaping in the buffer with vegetation. Mr. Lee stated that the maintenance of landscaping areas was covered in the City's Landscape Manual. It was through zoning enforcement, complaint, or the operation of a particular store that the landscaping would be maintained. Commissioner Ray emphasized for the residents in attendance, that if the vegetation were to begin to die off or begin to look trashy, they needed to complain to the City. MS (Moot/Fuller) that the Planning Commission adopt GPA-93-06 to amend the General Plan from Professional and Administrative Office to Retail Commercial and adopt PCZ-93-E and rezone from C-O Commercial Office and R-1 Single Family to C-C Central Commercial and to _10 - . ," PC Minutes -20- October 13, 1993 add no. 23 to the Precise Plan Standard to provide for an exclusive right-turn-only lane on "J" Street for the eastbound to southbound movement, so that eastbound to southbound movement is required. Commissioner Fuller, on behalf of the Commission, thanked the neighborhood and the members of the Church for the time they had spent for trying to come up with a plan that would be equitable for everyone. She felt it was a needed improvement in the area, and thought it might entice some of the old residents back to that location. Commissioner Ray wanted to include some wording regarding right-of-ways for westbound traffic on "J" Street west of Third Avenue. He asked if that should be addressed, or if the Commission should say there should be dedicated left- and right-hand-turn lanes heading west to go to either the north or the south of "J" Street, which would be west of Third. He asked if there was any objection to calling that Item 24. As an explanation, Commissioner Ray said the Traffic Consultant was advocating a left- and a right-turn lane, and a middle lane heading east on "J" Street, west of Third Avenue. He'd like to see the same condition west of Third Avenue on "J" Street for traffic heading west. This would allow a left-turn into the store without impeding traffic. Associate Planner Reid stated that the Traffic Consultant was suggesting that consideration be given to requiring a conceptual, striping plan for that particular area. Assistant Planning Director Lee explained that a large-scale plan would be done to see how it worked, and could be brought back to the Commission for review and a report, and then could be forwarded on the Design Review Committee. In answer to Commissioner Ray, Chair Martin asked that a separate motion be made to add this as Item 24. Before the Chairman called for the vote, Associate Planner Hernandez said he believed a motion to adopt the Negative Declaration should be done fIrst. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf was concerned about the nexus between the proposed requirement and the project. Without consulting the applicant or having any careful thought, he was concerned that there was a lawful, proper extraction with regard to this approval. Mr. Rudolf felt it might be more appropriate for the Commission wished to do a companion, follow-up motion to investigate the possibility and explore if it was legally appropriate to add that in as a design review feature when the precise plan itself came forward for consideration by the Design Review Committee. Commissioner Ray said he was comfortable voting for the amendment to the General Plan but was not comfortable voting for the rezone with that condition for the reasons he stated, plus the concerns stated by the owner of the property of the current Lucky Store. The current conditions -fl~ PC Minutes -21- October 13, 1993 indicate that the street either needed to be widened or something had to be done to address that. He would make a separate motion, unless there was a concern about that. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf replied that if the applicant had no objection, it could be included. The applicant indicated there was no objection. Commissioner Moot, as maker of the motion, said that action needed to be taken regarding adoption of the Negative Declaration, and then move on the motion made. MSC (Moot/Ray) 6-0-1 (Commissioner Tuchscher-conflict of interest) to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring Report. MSC (Moot/Ray) 5-1-0-1 (Commissioner Tuchscher-conflict of interest; Commissioner Salas against) to adopt GPA-93-06 to amend the General Plan from Professional and Administrative Office to Retail Commercial and adopt PCZ-93-E and rezone from CoO Commercial Office and R-1 Single Family to C-C Central Commercial and to add no. 23 to the Precise Plan Standard to provide for an exclusive right-turn-only lane on "J" Street for the eastbound to southbound movement, so that eastbound to southbound movement is required; and to include condition no. 24 to prepare a conceptual striping plan. Associate Planner Hernandez announced that this item would be taken before the City Council on November 2, 1993. -/;)- . RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF 10/11/93 MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING Resource Conservation Commission ChuIa Vista, California 6:00 p.m. Monday, October 11, 1993 Council Chambers Public Services Building CAU. !4bHl'.u'fG TO ORDBRlROLL CAlL: Meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Vice-Chairman Hall. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid called roll. Present: Commissioners Hall, Myers, Burrascano, Ouerreiro. It was MSUC (MyerslHa11) to excuse Commissioner Kracha from meelini as he ia out of town; and Ghougassian who is campaigning the month of October; vote 4-0. [Commission 1ohnson not yet present]. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was MSUC (Burrascano/Guerreiro) to approve the minutes of the meeting of September 20, 1993 with one correction: On page one, Item If2 discussion under Negative Declaration IS-93-43 - Myers comments and objection related to the taking of the gnatcatcher habitat. On Pase 2, item #3 under Commissioner's Comments, Myers asked that -minutes be received by Thursday for adequate time to review... -; vote 4.0. NEW BUSINESS: 3. Negative Declaration for Lucky Store IS-93-20 - Doug Reid reported on the specifics of the negative declaration, including information on the two loading facilities located on the south side of the building; the consolidation of delivery times to the store; additional right turn lanes to be added on J Street to enter at the post office; and the left turn signal to be installed on 3rd Avenue. Myers stated she needed further infonnation regarding the impact and more time to review the document. Guerreiro opposed the Jar&er store in an already dense area and taking adjacent playground space. It was moved and seconded (Burrascano/1ohnson) to approve the negative declaration for Lucky Stores; vote 3-2, motion failed for lack of majority. In further discussion, it was noted that if this neptive declaration was not approved, Lucky Stores would just move to another location because they lost their lease at the present location. This is also the only major supermarket in the general area and one that residents can walk to. Myers withdrew her negative vote if it meant the store would have to move entirely out of the area; vote 4-1, motion paned. -/3-" PUBLIC INPUT SECTION SUMMARY OF TOWN MEETING COMMENTS LUCKY STORE GENERAL PLAN AND REZONING PROPOSAL AUGUST 13, 1993 1. - Present Lucky Store operation generates noise at early morning hours- delivery trucks, trash collection vehicles, etc. 2.- Trash enclosures generate undesirable smell and attract undesirable people. 3. - There have been a lot of accidents at the intersection of Third and "J" Street. A left turn signal should be installed to make the intersection safer. 4.- Truck traffic along the west property line will most likely generate noise and exhaust fumes affecting the westerly adjacent residential neighborhood. 5.- The building could have been located at the southeast end of the parcel away from the residential area. 6.- Trash enclosures, outdoor storage areas and mechanical equipment should be located inside the building or away from the west side of the building. 7.- Trucks traffic is not permitted along "J" Street. Enforce the no truck traffic. 8.- A 9 ft. wall can be installed along the west property line to shield the adjacent residences from the noise generated by delivery trucks. 9.- The new and more modern store will provide additional services and will be convenient particularly for senior citizens. However, the new facility should incorporate the necessary measures to resolve the issues raised at the meeting. 10- Concern about the increase in traffic along Third Avenue which is already impacted by the Post Office. - 11 - - ---- I_ .. .... NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING December I, 1992 Summar)' of CUbeD eommeats I. Concerned about rezoning from residential to commercial in western portion of site. 2. Move store to the front of the site by 3rd Street. Don't object to parking lot next to their homes; do object to loading. 3. Concerned about lights at night. 4. Concerned about 24.hour nature of deliveries. S. Prefer access on 3rd, not on J Street. 6. Place store facing north on east side of site, so loading in on south side by post office. 7. What type of fencing will be used? Block wall? Would also like chain link on top of wall like post office for security. Maybe a variance to exceed height could be obtained. 8. What about keeping store where it is, but putting loading on south side? 9. Enforce limitation on truck access onto J Street. 10. Can hear noise from ~ block away. II. Concerned about traffic increasing on J and 3rd Streets, especially with already existing traffic from post office. If signal or turn lane improvements arc needed, please provide. 12. Object to moving store at all. 13. Wants new store, but wants loading area relocated. 14. Concerned about other retail uses eo what will they be? Will it be a mini mall and attract undesirables? Don't want fast food or liquor stores. IS. Have problem with garbage blowing around neighborhood from existing store. Can trash be put directly into trash compactor from inside store? 16. In favor of store moving, but save the bells. 17. In favor of store moving. 18. Consensus of people there .0 want new store, but want loading area moved and access, traffic and noise issues addressed. 44 people in attendance. cc: Pat Senn . Lucky Stores William Tuscher . Grubb &: Ellis Jim Hirsch. FORMA Steve Griffin' City of Chula Vista Barbara Reed. City of Chula Vista Enclosure: List of Attendees ", 3100 BristOl Street. Suite 100' Costa Mesa. CA 92626' (714) 540-4700' FAX (7141_8 --- I ~ -- COMMUNITY PlANNING. LANDSCAPE ARCHITfCTVRE . AECREATIJN DESIGN AND SPECIAl mECTS . \MAN DESIGN' E>MI'()NII9ITAl ~''<4GEMENT . GO'/E!NENT SERVICES' MAPPING SElMCES J .:!.. .)~, kf,." /(J~ t1/I/~l1rh sr 11 II ...... "~- 9'/ 'I/o 1,I;J-7-7/DO \.. Mr. l J Mrs. Matthew Henderson ia December 9, 1992 Douglas D. Reid Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California '- - ...1,,( 'f:-l.,... \.I<~ Dear Mr. Reid: Last night representatives of American Stores Properties, Inc. held a meeting for interested parties to present their plan for the parcel of land at Third Ave. and J St. We are at a loss to see why they would propose a plan that seemingly represents no consideration at all to surrounding residents. There are existing homes on only a small corner of this property. It /lakes no sense to place the loudest, most unpleasant part of the project, in the form of 24 hour loading docks and the actual store itself, right on top of the few homes that border on this parcel. We do' not object to the new store. If planned properly it will enhance the general neighborhood and be convenient for all of us. That seemed to be the general opinion of the all the people attending the meeting. However, we would like to propose that Ie store be positioned on the south side of the property facing north with the .oading docks toward the Post Office. Delivery trucks would then have direct access from Third Avenue. The parking lot will have entrances from Third Avenue and J Street in either case so we think it can be arranged and landscaped just as effectively as it is on the proposed plan. Also, we have a few other concerns. The height of the wall between our homes and the parcel is important. We would like to feel reasonably Bure that people in and aro4rd the store property will not have easy access to our yards. Six feet does not seem high enough. A higher wall would also muffle some of the noise. We are interested in the lighting too. Will our yards be like daylight all night? We hope you will seriously consider our concerns and suggestions. Most of the families on Garrett Ave. have lived here since 1952. We have a lot invested in our homes and property. We would appreciate being informed of further proposals and any meetings regarding this plan. Sincerely, o1tlil<.~ /JJ:t/~fiI1l<o./ ~c: Jeff Guth American Stores Properties, Inc. J. Patrick Senn Area Real Estate Manager .---Ib~ ( \ !~ DEC] '~ - r ' . ~r...,\ Chula Vista, Ca. Dec. 12. 1992 Mr. Douglas D. Reid Environmental Review Coordinator Dear Sir. After attending the aeeting for the Initial Study (Lucky Market) on Tuesday Dec. 8th, it is our personal opinion that this project as it is presently planned as shown to us will have a definite environmental iapact on all the neighboring residents and .specially the nine of us on the .ast .ide of the 700 block of Garrett Ave. a Speaking for ayself. I aa definitely against having^loading and unloading facilit~nd all the noise, traffic and fuaes just sixty feet away trom my back yard. Yours truly, J.anae . Fred Goodhola ~J~~ ~ . . - 11- . B~bBums lleaUci S . , Oft} De~ember 14, 1992 City of Chula Vista Planning Department Environmental Review Coordinator P.O. Box 10B7 Chula Vista, CA 91912 Dear Mr. Re1d, The noti~e of In1tial Study on the proposed Lu~ky Market and ~enter lo~ated at 3rd and "J" streets requested ~omments regard1ng any anti~ipated env1ronmental impa~t. My business, Bob Burns Cleaners, 1S lo~ated immed1ately south of the Post Offi~e. Traffi~ 1n the v1~ln1ty is so heavy, at t1mes, that exiting my park1ng lot 1S very d1ff1~ult. The Post Offi~e has found 1S ne~essary to restr1~t vehi~les eX1ting thier lot to right turns only. The 1mpa~t of the proposed ~enter on traff1~, and spe~lfl~ally on the ab1lity of veh1~les to exit my lot and that of the Post Off1~e, would be severe. Sin~erely, ~~~ Terry Tanber Owner 768 Third Avenue, Chula Vista, California 92010619-422-2922 - / g- - IL .. i... \ "- 11..-...(. (~~ / j / l If?2-\. u.'~ l-T c.u~ /0-- f(~(j L'-1~~ ~'- ~C-'- ~. ;rL ;u&~~ t1- ~ ~.~ K.-u- ;tz p:'" J?7.t-~ ~ ~, Qr~v.-..;I) ~jI 'J" k. 7J'11c~ ~ '1,3 +. f)~ tU~. ~ 'yr.7 ~. /t~ f1.t'-J/-{-<V\-~A .i~ u~~ u~ Jd7. l,~cvJj-v-{~ t ~~C-? ~~d.~; ~ V~ C-{l~ ~ ~~ J-~~ . 71/.-<- ~'+...... Ce/\-~ !"(j ;:-1.,. IJ1c7 {J t-l'-< ;t-~ c<~ C'..(...J:.<.... jk~-:t: 2- . n I .,.- it:t . --..L-- i' .".A....(..-t.~:.... ~ , J.-I1~t~ fh-...-.-'v..-<t:hf.-./G."i-400 ,.....-< ~7..A...:.7 )1 c~A 11AF (L, -It".~ ,-,.,......')'- 7~ ~ ~ ci~~ ,;2., ;71tL-<- ,{l<1r'- 77,,,,,_1.0 ~- ~L......,J:...~j ti.-1..<c_ '] . ( j (. r-,~ . /.J-I~~ . ~ 4.-.-- t,,"- --f c-...( '- ? !-'UU~ 7' "0-7 e.6-.-. ,"'t; -{,-, t-t'2..- ,;t-- --f~ ,-"'" :IJ",,~ J -r 4. ~,ya~'\A.- l1/,;:a ....".. ,~'1''''-''- ce---ei j"'~'-<'P- J.u c--. ~ c...c... .::ft-.... .~ (; "4.b7~Y '--<-;t; cL ~ 0- c____-<- ,4c-~ J , .5. ~~.~ c.......,( ~-.-.-.-- V7 ~~.....i/l.r{~O'~"!" -t"""rJ {~~__tt :dv -I~ ,1..- 'if ~ , -.-. ~. [J;K'j"l-f 'J1.A c.L /Z--.f (L~ ~ j;: ..f;. a.~ ~ . 7~1 r""(j' /11c.-r7 -z,...,.. ~..{...g... ~ tz'c:.-- z,~~ ~ hJ....-Lc,~ 71-~ /~t~ ::rf':J(~rJ i~~ h~' ;Z'~ ~ Hj..<. c-C r>'-'"'- ~ ~{/ ~~ t:-.~''l..A-t'""'"'- . G f{~::rp~ / . . ~;cl .~ ~ ~, v'~ ...-v .L.- ~ - ~___ 7J1.t1.. J.. /1"'h.M.,.L.. '1. ~ ., .... . I ~ J.'~ -(,J?c... ..J I fj 9'? L~.~ ~ :.. e, I .~ ~ ~y~~. ,_.:. !SS2 . ~"~~"_,"':.3, .. .-&.~ c-" ~~~-tJu. !7~~ .Jt..Jz.1)J(~ ~, oJ . ~~~itk-~~~~.",~~ -'''7~ ~t.""'<L/~5:<)-tLc. ~~ 3~t;~ ~~t:Lu-~~~. ~~peLd~ iIud/H~.r-o-~~ ~ ~ t:t4.o ~ c...-I~~ .J ~ t7~~~~ ~-rtk~,-d.__~_ lAX+e- ~ ~ ~a.l-&~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ..l~ ~ ~~ QT~-f~~rC!a-t.f. tJtt'7IV h~~4~~~~al.;;J-ti~ a-r.d~ ~-f'~~~. w-d1 ~~~Ii-~\~~ tt~ w-I ~I.d,/~a.tj~ ~ ~~, . -6jk-r~ r--L.~ ~/~~~'I~ ~ ~ 4'Azj g;c.-+o- i A'O-c).7~~~.Jh~ (~~!!) ('tjf....k~d:'l 'f~. ~-~~ ~ AAH ct......;!- ~ ~ ~7:i~Q' -"1~' bL-~ ~ti ~7 ~/~ ~~~-d- t.Jv'1).Li&~~tk~/J~ik..A<'~ ~ {,..~ J un~ ~.~ ~ r.fJ~/;~ --a~~f~-4. Jt~ :tr~~3-I ~ /..()--l-H~~' A~~~~ ~d.~ ~(C v) ~~...btL~ ~ ~ r{~~ ~)~, t/.k~t-/W~(j~.J~ ~~. . U?IYe\. r..&.-~~I~ , ~J"~t UTJu--IlV7tU ~~J .,v/-~. ~?M.~~'LJ t:l.ttffl' ~ffir'~L~ ~ .' ~ ~~ u..rr-d~~&~A~~. 7J~'fI~ ~'/""4...-v. ~. ~l ~ ,,y ~c c~~ N& .s-93- o~ "- ~ P".J('A~t IJNl(JR,C',,'; stelle.{ fRcp~ttilt.~ , IIC' _ -:k$ c;...it+ Plibjet.T Loe-A r,D" S<-THwt!sT C:"~/f'al! e6 ~J ""J ;j.s-r !JL (.1. ;~ ()o,y>..TI.,t~ j.IfT. d Oe(""'- {.. lfeZc""wf ro ot3 _ 9"8,,1 ~o <?/fIe S"T..,,~ - tV J.'IJ 115'7;:.11 .To" f/?,r" (~ .:lw60IIA""rS CN t;;(PI"e-f'" - SO...--rflw't!JS'-r s.le "".$ Ff?Ort!1117/: ;},- J7ttc/,,,.t>J /....",.r;" t>; S1"'eJff! -4- "',~, hlRII- Wily! Ifflll",rt p.1/ f j)f>.v,.1tJ l'RoieArt1.f e>"'-""t:~-r s,j~e5 ;P~"'f6;r,TI 1r,4$1 cf ""s- h~..." Ptl-r: I" 1-'11""'" ~ e A (1 ~o y"~ 1:$_ .arK7,t,.I~ 7e>.9 0'" 11, c,cvs,..te ~A"(ipfl/, J.-IV&>F$c;'/ Cc!:s1'i./i'tl rR....c./t'J'. TiiJldl C'Dlle-ct,o"'" ~6~/'e~f"7,c'" 7"...dl""~ tr"'''If-.I~'( /I" ~e. ,...J. V ( ;J./i'f''''1' "".f ~'T"~c;kRf (f/MfOTy o."Se" ;:'1l9", ~TcA:'C;., '1,_ ~/... ..TlfeR rc.1! A, "', .t~/o c.t>~~7I1AJ7 11,.1 'IfASII pl/~S f}fJ{/r'~7F"-~",e-~f:"" r,.~IJPfe- oy f'lfl'",-r j.oW~~' .f. JIIc..tt.t NO/~~ fA&. ,elf: j , ~ Co c,c... "'18 Ad-A 7 , C) 4/ /,_ ~. r6 S7ciPt' A/~" 'f '5f>u -rH ~nJ e- e...f f'F-Dpen.1t A{o"r Pt>s7 <'>$. C 6 p.....,I.L,....r / I 71I1tT ONe. 5'. j t. .:, /to lfe@It:iC:-AlTO II Re" At~~r 1t1~ + /ttllr ..JpJi A/ Y pnH!:-/f/e.R. . ... J- I -- /'dS'-CJ3 ~<~ L!~ CJw.& ~dtL fJ~ Lk,aJ-. d).7 </ ~ CLue... Ciudo.. ~~ &. Q/110 ..t,1f4 m~ ~ ,.~ 111 ~~, ~ ~.k-~:,J4 r ~ ~ ;t/1/j ...J ..4M? ~ ~ "D ..,j..k ~ ~ 't3 ~<(!Jy vmtL~ ;fer >>u. ~ ~ .:tc- ..d~ ~ ..{~ J~J~~bXL ~I Auf Y ~ ~ :Jir ~ .:J:Jc.J oJ ~ :t:AL ~ ~.b- ..AM ~~. .::&- tW.A ~ ..M ~J.. r' t,~ -n. ..:tA.t. .-td{Jt. ~ .6Ii)p~~ ~ .::Ut.vu- p../1r~ ..bi- ...-;1-?-/ -.;1.- ~ ~. ..d/Kd .,u;oulJ. ~ ~~~r~(~;-1 ~. /)).dh.:bu- ~ ~ ~~~i'<1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~, ~L~ .JA-J~ j'f-- ;;"e jg-tJ..Xk~ ~ ~ ~~~~k..L~a.~ e'\ ,I)..- ~ ~. LIJ.Lli .:t/u:aJ-0 ~ ~, ~-~ r . _'v<L 1A-~ ;;(;- / uJ. ,/~ ~v. ~ __AopL Aj:--~ ~ ~ ~ ~q-' &;-y~~ ~ . ~~t7<-J / & I~~ ~. r, .. . " ).3/ / , ... \.. o Jan. 9, 1993 Mr. Steven Griffin Chula Vista Planning Dept. 274 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Griffin: This is to support plans alre~dy approved for Lucky Market's move to the site, corner of Third and J Sts., now occupied by First United Methodist Church. Surely the new location will facilitate both ingress and egress for customers and thereby improve traffic flow in the area. With the building properly positioned on the property there should be neglible noise increase in the neighborhood. As Lucky customers we look forward to the new location of the store. Sincerely Yours,~ . )'7.-'\..-, R-I '- , ~)-t./V7 / ;/ rLL~ - t11-h.l. \>-,!~/4-~ Mr.& Mrs. Earl BiggersV a ,-;t-L/'- " i C,' () . J'--1~/JI /7'i3 ~~ )..., ff~/f~ / j ~~..;t PI- J ~r ~ ;d.. ~ i ~ .:t: .:Ct..- ~ rl"> 71~ ;~ U-n ~ ~T~d;.f f~ M1.t' ~o:;Ld, YAtu-~ ~f~/l a:f. ~ ~ ;Iv fN<.- ,~. -"r..a.~ .-4f>.(! f~ tV ,J ';&.~ i<- fF"....i r:T'-1A../ 7,-t-lL f1.<-<'~ Zi-et+ ~I ~f (. 1t' Ii.<.-r j ?v-<. <--e.v~..-k" J;:1L ~M..L- ...-1'...(. 1'1 , --;-- / / ) , .ir-c:,"<. ~ cI n->" ~ t; . c.J<<-NcL cr.:1y I dt 7"10:- -ZA~V- JJl~ ~~-n~1 k -!:!-W(r-t' .~1.{.~ 7rt 4 ~ ~ " C~,A'-. ~ -;r~ ..v." ,2.(~ 1~f t"~ .rf-7 It ~ /'~.cp ., ' . ,yt '/, -ML( d ~..." ~ J --tc-~, I~ fi 'TJo.<.-L- [n.,.,'n.~,"'-'--t: , Jr-L 7?) I~, xL ~ -d..A I ~/~/.Ip~~rt(U ""feeL '. ~~ A ./1-17:.- ",-""cf Vl'-<~7J~.. ~vT' - fl, "~'7~) 0 . /J;, r.>~ PI,. J I, r::> I . , ,.' -. . ~ ".--"-0 fl/ JI;{, 1 '. '.L. lQ9~ _ ..... ,I f:' ~ It.. , . -- ' r-",'V .... .., G .. i\ . .\ \ ~ ,.. ~ )..~ ~ I 4 ~_ 11//'/13 ~ /::l~;+;'- ~I!I~ p~f).z-p:<.., :"7t; .f--~ tLK. ~ V ~ ,CA 'rtq/ () , I " ~ '- f)~ 111-'1. /'j q~ J.. /)\. . 'V'~ ~ ~ ~tr< erf Jv--~' %1 wJo!...<: # 7/0 I~ ~......-(. Ak &-. /11"'~~~- 11'f ~ ~~ ?17c~ ~L~ rJ4'L-<)'~ ~-./'*- a ~J--dL ~ .~A.)";'A.J /,J-{ ""'^ "A/;~'"L frt ?tf...< L4VJVVF~';-<'-;{;;(j- ~~I AA..'-'--U ~2A.....?tI-< ~. '1- ~"'J ,. )- ~" ,~/]/wr ~~n. ~ ~ -;;U<.t/J ,~~ .. ~ 11-1 A.6. ~ ?~WY"""/"v , rr. '1/9/0 ~ tL Ie / '. 'Co ~ /2, 1C/93 ~- ..J"t;"s.e'7t./ ,~.,d C'~ ve.o"ti' .&?~"o..L,r . ;:2.'7--/ ~z:;6~, (/ -7/ ~ ~',C'<Z', 4/Qlo r-"~' - . 1.......:... _::..:..: if ...:...:...: " ' ) ,":.', i. ~ &GcUI,~. r _l . , tf} ~at~ ~/ cv~~t: ::/ ~ 2.kotv . ~ ~.t& ~L. a;C ~-'o~ ~ ~~ /9S-.:,- ~A~,~~t.ao~~~d~..e ~:..~ ~~~ ~-n/ ~ ~~~',d7"-QO..1'~ ~ YWl:? ~"I> ~'VU'~ ~t;' ~~~, ~ ~ t22.nc-€/ "t ..t:J4.J ~ ~ ~_<!'& -7 ~/ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~, ~ /P1J'"J'c ' ~rt'-- ~rJ ~~~ 7 a ~ )t;; .~-c . ~-t;l;~) ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ A.A.....,-- ~'~!1 ~ ~ ...t;;. d.u ~r:;Zw-uz:t7 ~~ ~ ~~ C'~. Cf/l/t-d- St..,kJ. ~~, c-",~~ ffW~ .~.l ~. .:Jt., ~~ ffi/t;~' (!.rn.t;4.tJI~eL- ~ ~7 ~~~. .p, ~ u~tJ2, Yrz4--t/ 4~1 ~ ~~-..-~ ~ .~~ t::~-<I-'~~,Q)~~) ~'"ffk~ r~/~&: .-t.c~~ .1 ~~ .~ ~cV' -0/ ~,&; ~ ~:tn'iz.u~<7, ~ d~ ~ . ..f >w ~.dV ~ ~ . ," - - , ~ . ~c:M:V~/U""'" -;;-r~~...", ~~ ~+..17 4-u ~~~ A:; .:cRv '~~ ""'-,,,.1./ ~ ..dv ~-u~~ ~. V:tf/ rH/ ~d:?.' ~. ~-D' >n...fl.u~ " """'II "110 . _;J1.- . _.... ......-. ( ( JAN. 12, 1993 r MR. STEVEN GRIFFIN CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPT. 274 FOURTH AVE. CHULA VISTA, CA. 91910 RE: LUCKY MARKET CHANGE OF LOCATION DEAR MR. GRIFFIN, WE HAVE BEEN RESIDENTS OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE LAST 12 YEARS, AND PRIOR TO THAT, WE GREW UP HERE. SINCE WE RETURNED TO THIS CITY, WE HAVE WATCHED A NUMBER OF SUPER MARKETS CLOSE FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS. THE SAFEWAY (WINDMILL FARMS) AND ALPHA BETA. TO NAME JUST TWO IN THE OLD CENTER OF CHULA VISTA. THE LUCKY STORE AT 3RD AND J STREETS HAS BEEN IN THAT LOCATION FOR MANY YEARS. IT SERVES A VERY LARGE SECTION OF CHULA VISTA AND. IN MY OPINION, HAS REPLACED THE STORES THAT HAVE CLOSED. WE HAVE SHOPPED THERE SINCE WE RETURNED TO THIS CITY BECAUSE IT'S LOCATION IS CONVENIENT FOR US AND THE STORE IS COMPETITIVE. THERE IS ONLY ONE PROBLEM WITH THE STORE - IT IS TO SMALL! WE ( WOULD LOVE TO SEE IT EXPAND IT'S FACILITY AND IT'S PARKING LOT. , WE SUPPORT THE RE-LOCATION OF THE LUCKY STORE TO 710 THIRD AVE. THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOU ATTENTION IN THIS MATTER. SINCERELY YOURS. , '. ) ~1 \ "'1'/ {",'y {"'1/1 '.{d:..> . ., ~. v, u~ I iI... U7- 'LY+<DA REYNbLDS 1910 - Jg- . .\,~. - '. . 'C'~ ' ( ~e \ c.) <.0\ C..' ( e\ c.... . \..'" ~ .' " . ~ ( '.' -, I : '-D. 'II " .. \.. '" . vf-_; '.... 11.r/u JJt" ~) : J ~ U ;;&.f.-d ~ .-t~ ~ ~ --H ~~i~ ~-~ 1- ~ ~ tr"- 3dl:r~. 1Lt. ".....~1- ~ ~/~ wt.J . 111 I ~ 11/' -<4 ~ ~~ ~J""""'" ~I A<. "- ~~ ~~. 72.- JJJ~i~j~~ ---,(~~~~~~ ~~~~~~ crr-1~ ~ ,;c::L:. ~. el~~~6-~~ 0-1. ~~ 4~j ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ .;t{r:d-e. ~. -t.', G-~'_c.:; ) ~I?~ r-."I f. B ...~b.,..- I r~ l.t. ( 'tl'r()~ {f?30 ~J9- l ,., January 15, 11/1/3 Steven Griffin Chula Vista Planning Dept. 274 Fourth Ave Chula Vista. CA1!'!mI r' _. , ~ "'-.', ", '"-.- . , ._~- IJ....II ., u~ .. ". _......_' "'."w._..... o. . Dear Mr. Griffin: " I am wntmg m support oi Lucky Stores move to the southwest comer oi 3rdAve. and J Street. I think this win be a significant improvement to this part of town and long needed. I believe it win generate increased business by offeJing more spadous and attractive shopping to the many customers who patronize the stOTE', including mysl'lf I urge that you approve their request for a General Plan ammenJment and the oth<:r necessarl procedures. c:s:elv, ..,-~,~&J-) /q /) _ 30- . I ~ , . Mrs, Robert F. Kelley ~ GLL \'i~._, ~J:L. '_ Vln8 9anuaAV 18, 1993 I: " mA. Steven ~ALffLn ChuLa VL4ta PLannLni Dept. 274 FouAth Avenue ChuLa VL4ta, CA 91910 DeaA mA. ~ALffLn: We want to a4k fOA ~OUA 4UppOAt Ln the matteA of LUC~'4 SupeAmaARet bU~Ln~ OUA ChUACh pAOp- eAtv (FLA4t UnLted methodL4tl at ThLAd and 9 StAeet. '" !--' " ;: ....' We beLLeve a new and LaAieA LuckV'4 at OUA Lo- cat Lon wLLL be an LmpAovement to the neLihboA- hood, attAact mOAe bU4Lne44, and facLLLtate the fLow of tAaffLc a4 opp04ed to Lt4 pAe4ent LocatLon. We can undeA4tand the neLihboA4 who aAe pAO- te4tLni the new 4toAe a4 Lt mav. abut theLA pAOpeAtV.' HoweveA, aLL ThLAd ~venue wLLL eventuaZLv. be aLL commeAcLaL bU4Lne44e4, and theAe wLLZ be no waV the4e neLihboA4 wLLL not be affected Ln 40me waV4 not to theLA LLkLni' ShouLd the CLt~ eLect to do an tIR 4tudv of thL4 matteA (WhLCh we undeA4tand couLd take 4LX month4), Lt wouLd mean 4eALOU4 'LnancLaL pAobLem4 lOA FLA4t methodL4t. much tLme and monev ha4 aLAeadv been 4pent Ln bUVLni the new 4Lt~ on H StAeet, LmpAovement4 to the Land, ~eAmLt4, etc., etc. (oveA) . - ~ 1-. 2/ ~Lea4e ~LVe thL4 matteA VOUA 4eALOU4 COn4LdeA- atLOn. VeAV tAuLV VOUA4, , J- - - :? QaV\. IC,/Iqq 3: " , ,J)IZ,..QK- f()r. ~ f1. ~'\.. / .I4.'~ CD.' )~ --lo ~ d\-~ -l,~ l-Re.. y- .J.. S ~O"T"r>Q 1Ju..e';:'~ ~ --L --~~ ~.~ of-th-e.. ~o-ue ~-~ ~'S ~u."1. ~ ~-,.. . ' '-~ -c.. ~ _______ _~~ ~~~ .~Y)' ~ cct. ~', ~ he-e.!'"\; o.~IO~ Q"'")c~~ ~ ~u u>-~ ~l~ ~ ~~~4 ~ u..~kJ'- ~~ W~bi o~ ~~ .r;~ ~J~ ~ ~(. o~"'" ~e, 0\.Ju---c... Ue-M -1..0 d-o ~ ~~ ~Lr~' ~ U<L 4~s _3:3 - --...-.--- . ~. ~___1._ ~ Q...p ,r7_ ....... ~ P""'" i:>-So ~ ~~.r~~ ~YYl. :In.--. \ ~\)~ -L~ Ir\I2...I..-....> ~-ue. ~ be c...... ~~-\ ~A-"""1. -L:. ~ c::...D""YY""'>...,.--, u.. ~ D', Q ~ ~ o--c..-:-.Lt"..:y '- Lr<;., ~ ~ ~ ~ C\ -L ~ ~.;::t d~'1;'eQ.-; ~e.. Joh::':> ~tJ 6(!.~e Qu...;JC~~J_~ G ~ G....;)e.Ll ~ OX"'e-c:/1 C/':::' Q.. <:.~ ~ o .. [1 J::. '"O'e.e.~",>">,,">e,,,-& - u,e- ~e.... '~ i&~_ .h~ ~ 0 ~~ - .34--- Re: Case # GPA-93-03, PCZ~93-E, Meeting QQ 004.... -<-< (")0 r- on me-> ::C;r ~c:. <n'- o~ ,,<' -v :!: v,; ... (")~ U'I m:l> C>> Scheduled Oct. 13, 1993 ~ f! October 12, 1993 City Planning Commission and City Council of Chula Vista Ca 91910 - - N ::u 1"1 o 1"1 - < FT1 o To Whom it May Concern: As a resident of the property located at 670 Del Mar Ave, Chula Vista, Ca, I am very interested in ~h~t is happening to the area around -' our property. There are serveral problems that I would like to see addressed at the Planning Copmission meeting: 1. Traffic congestion caused by exiting traffic from future site. At the present time there can be a real problem from traffic backing up at the Main Post Office between J St and K St. 2. Noise caused in the v~ry early moring hours for servicing of future commercial outlets. At this time we are woken up every morning between 5:30 and 6:00 A.M. by trash trucks picking up garbage at present commercial property occupied by Lucky Markets. It is bad enough it happens on week days but when it happens on the weekend it is very frustrating to say the least. My husband says we need jobs which will be provided by the different commercial outlets, true but these homes were here a long time before the commercial property and I feel our rights to peace and quiet should be respected and taken into consideration. rdi~! A/'.. ~/\d~~ lIfl1/:UJI1 ~ecfa H. Gleghorn ~~ ~ .0 _ 3S'- . .. ' ~ ~ ~1 t f 1 ~ ~<? 1.~ .tJJ!~ l' i. r. ~ to' ~ ~4 1 ~ ~~~.f~,3~J.J d ~~ H ~ j J cY .~~ .g . ~ ~ F'~ ~ ~ ~ a . . I rJ\ ~ ..~ A ~ f . ~"5.r 29 (/1 } . 2 . ~~ ~ ~.1 .8~ ~~J~r1 J- r P'- -~ 1 ~] H J ~ , " j,. ~4 ~ r dI . ~ ~~ ~ : ~-{~ r~j,3 I . ~ 2 A fg 1 ~ J1 J b 1 ~J _ 30- . -~ , .. ~-~ , . . MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Mitigated Negat.1fe Declaratio PROJECT NAME: Lucky Store PROJECT LOCATION: Southwest Comer of Third A venue and J Street ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO:. 573-320-01 and 573-320-45 PROJECT APPLICANT: American Stores Properties, Inc. CASE NO: IS-93-20 DATE: August 23, 1993 A. Proiect Setting The project setting consists of a 5.8 acre two-parcel site located at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and J Street. The site is currently developed with the First Methodist Church building, a fellowship hall, and several additional buildings are ancillary (0 the church and a single family dwelling. There are currently 72 parking spaces on site for the church and additional parking spaces that are in conjunction with the other buildings. Access to the church is from Third Avenue on the east, and J street on the northerly side of the site. Adjoining land uses are: single family residences west of the site, and the existing Lucky Store and a condominium comPlex located to the north. Third Avenue and commercial uses are located to the east of the store and ilie Masonic Lodge and post office adjoin the church on the south. B. Proiect DescriDtion The project description consists of amending the General Plan Designation on the site from Professional and Administrative to Retail-Commercial, rezoning the easterly 300 feet of the property from Office- Commercial to Central-Commercial subject to a precise plan and the westerly 325 feet of the parcel from R-1 (Single family detached) to Central-Commercial subject to a precise plan. The applicant, American Stores Properties, Inc., is not filing a concurrent application for a precise plan. American Stores is the parent company of Lucky Stores and it is their intent, should they receive approval of the general plan amendment and rezone to apply to the City for a precise plan for a Lucky Store. Therefore, although the project description is for a General Plan amendment and rezone, the analysis for purposes of this enviromnental document reviews the proposed use with the caveat that an additional analysis for a "worst-case" scenario in regard to traffic and noise be included. An analysis is needed to determine if, in the event the proposed general plan amendment and rezoning amendment were approved, could another use be permitted outright which would require additional mitigation over and above that required for the Lucky Store. A determination was made by analyzing the impact of the Lucky Store with the proviso that the acoustician and traffic engineers undertaking the analysis determine whether additional mitigation was needed which should then be required as precise plan guidelines in the zone. Within the broader context then, of the proposed General Plan Amendment and II ~{f? -.- ........-.......-.;;: - city of chula vista planning department cm OF environmental review seclion CHUlA VISfA ---31- -2- Rezone the applicant's eventual plan is for the removal of the existing First Methodist Church and its replacement with a 62,900 square foot Lucky Store. Approximately 50,000 square feet are proposed for the Lucky store. The remaining interior square footage is proposed for other drop-off stores such as a cleaner, or drug store, or a fast-food outlet. A conceptual development plan illustrating a potential site design depicts a 20 ft. landscape buffer and 6 ft. block wall on the westerly side of the site, a landscape buffer on the southerly side of the site near the post office providing a buffer between this proposed use and the post office and Masonic Lodge and a landscaped burfer along Third A venue in front of the store. The applicant proposes a total of 315 parking spaces on the eastern and southern portions of the site. The unloading area for the store will be on the south side. Access for the site is proposed on Third Avenue and on the southerly side of J Street. The hours of the store operation are proposed to be from 6:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M. Loading and unloading of the dock on the southern side of the store will be restricted to exclude the hours between 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M. as will the hours for loading and unloading of the general store merchandise. According to the applicant, the trash compactor operation necessary to the store operation will occur inside the store. Public service and utility requirements will be implemented by the applicant as is appropriate. The applicant's original proposal had been: to include a fast food outlet on the northwesterly portion of the site and to include unloading bays for meat and produce on the westerly and northerly sides of the store, in addition to having a 24-hour store. In response to the Notice of Initial Study of the above cited proposal, numerous phone calls and letters were received from surrounding residents. Some of the concerns raised by residents included: hours of operation, hours of use and location of unloading bays and the noise accompanying the same, noise from the trash compactor, noise from truck trailers parking in the alley with any mechanical equipment such as refrigerator/freezer units running, concerns about traffic increasing on J and Third Street, concerns about other retail uses. The applicant also met with City staff on several occasions to obtain staff response to the proposed project. As a result of reviewing the comments from residents as well as the comments from various City departments and the results of the acoustical and traffic analysis conducted on this proposed project, American Stores Properties, Inc. modified their conceptual development plan as is described in the beginning paragraphs of this section. . This amended project description is in compliance with fmdings of the Court under Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act that "Any needs or proposed mitigation measures must be incorporated into a proposed negative declaration and the project revised accordingly before the negative declaration is released for public review." (Sunstrom v. Mendocino- 1988). Discretionary actions for this proposal include a General Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment. C. ComDatibilitv with Zonine: and Plans The General Plan Designation for the site is Professional-Administrative and the zoning for the easterly 300 feet of the site is Commercial-Office. The zoning for the westerly part of the site is R-l, single - family residential. Churches are permitted with conditional use permits in all zones. Grocery stores of --- 3,1).... -3- the size proposed here are not pennitted in the C-O zone, the Commercial Office zone underlying the existing church building or the R-l Zone but are pennitted in the C-C zone (Central Commercial zone). If the General Plan is amended to Retail-Commercial subject to a precise plan and the Zone is amended to Central-Commercial subject to a precise plan as the applicant is proposing, a grocery store of the size proposed by the applicant would be pennitted subject to the review and approval of a precise plan. D. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista detennined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. Mitie:ation necessarv to avoid sie:nificant effects Specific mitigation measures regarding potential noise and traffic problems have been identified. The mitigation measures required to reduce the potentially significant impacts to a level of less than significant are as follows: A landscaped 6-foot block wall along the western wall along the western site boundary is required for additional noise protection; no delivery truck traffic shall occur in the service driveway with any mechanical equipment such as refrigerator/freezer units running during the time from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., the trash compactor shall not be operated between the hours from 10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M., Monday through Friday; 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. Saturdays; and 10:00 P.M. to 9:00 A.M. on Sundays and holidays, refuse or recycled cardboard trucks shall not collect waste materials during those times when operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited and any site use should not create noise levels exceeding 65db by day or 55 db at night (10:00 P.M. to 7:00 A.M.) at the property line of the nearest residential use. Traffic impact mitigation include: the placement of a median on Third A venue south of the intersection of J and Third and the an exclusive right turn only lane on "J" Street for the Eastbound to Southbound movement, and that a separate left-turn phasing at the intersection of Third Avenue arid "J" Street be provided. The attached Mitigation Monitoring Program must be adopted along with the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building pennit issuance. -3Cf- -4- G. Mandatory Findim!s of Si2nificance Based on the following fmdings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project, the amendment of the current General Plan Designation of Professional Administrative to Retail-Commercial and the amendment of the zoning on the property from R-I and C-O to C-C-P is within an urbanized area of the City. The site has been developed for years and a church is currently on the site. There are no waterways near the site or any known endangered species and the proposed project will not threaten or restrict any sensitive animal or plant community. There are no known significant biological or historical or prehistorical resources on the site. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. This project which consists of the general plan amendment and rezone of a site does not have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals with the adoption of the proposed mitigation measures and their incorporation as precise plan guidelines. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. This project does not have the potential to be individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study considered potential cumulative impacts. It was determined that with project specific mitigation measures the impacts to traffic and noise would be reduced to below a level of significance and would not be "cumulatively considerable. " ,-- t-/ t1 ~ -5- 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings either directly or indirectly as it must meet all Code requirements and requirements of various City departments. H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John Lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Frank Herrera-A, Planning Martin Miller, Planning Steve Griffin, Planning Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing Alex Saucedo, Building Department Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Rod Hastie, Fire Department Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Mary Jane Diosdado, Police Department Martin Schmidt, Parks and Recreation Department Barbara Reid, Planning Luis Hernandez, Planning Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Jim Hirsch and Jean Fallowfield 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan Final Technical Report. Luckv Grocery Store Traffic Impact Analvsis. prepared for American Stores Properties Inc. by JHK and Associates, August 20, 1993 Noise Impact Analvsis. Chula Vista Luckv Store No. 257, prepared for FORMA by Giroux and Associates _J/I--- -6- Memo from Hans Giroux and Associates, Environmental Consultants, re: Luckv Store. #257 Site. August 17, 1993 Preliminary Geotechnical Em!ineerine: ReDort. ProDosed Luckv Store #257. Third Avenue and "I" Street, Kleinfelder 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is avai1able from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. ~#~OO'DINATO' (LUC.ND) - 4,} - ~ " o ~ " ~ o !::: z ~ ~ -< " - !::: ~ oj ~ .~ & E-< ~ ffi 1; ~ ~ s .~ ~ ~ t.:) z ~ E-< - Z o ~ ~ ~ c:: ~ "S. .5 ~ .... '" e ~ ~ -g s ,r; .!:! .;;; ~ tfJ ~ ~ z o ~ t.:) !=: .... ~ E .!:! '" CU ~ . CU c:: ..s .51 .... OJ) 0 c::.!:! o 0 - .... .. "" = CU .. '" ~ '0 ~ c:: g- - ~ .,tJ .S .... .... 8:.0 ~-g -0 .... 1.s .."0 11! .~ "0& ; CU - .... < .~ ~B CU .... e ~ ~ 0 'g.1J ~ 8 c::E -E.~ cu= '" .~ .~ ~ ~ '5 ~ .. E 8 tI.IaJu:;: t":S.= ~ 1J &0 =~c: CU '" CU E:S E "S..... ~ c:: 0 0 .:= ~ 'E ~.g~ ~ ~ = ::I 0'8 E';;: ~ '" >> ~~.s ~ .@ ~2 ..~ ..s'S .~ ::I ~ .... >>!:! ~H . ~.:::Ej 4) ~ t":S ..s.98 = e .. .- CI.) r- .... OJ) ::I .... 0 C,,)~ ..... g ~ 5 - '" . -; C'I:S ~ '=.=0 "'00 o '" .. 1- Er.I 0 c::::.........-I jg ~ e e 0 ~ &:ltc.= o.~ g g..~ ~c; ; CUO-'=' ~ 'i; .. CU .J!! ~ "0 ~.~ o E ~ Z "0 ~.s e ~ ~ 0 'g.1J ~ e ;E "S.~ cu= '" .- .- ~ ~.... "" c:: . CU .... .. E 8 "'~!+:: cd._ ~ "0 &0 !!aJ- c:: .... c:: CU '" CU E .~ E ~..s8 "".... .... c:: 0 0 .:= ~ 'E ~.g~ 1;).iS = ::I o'S E';;: ~ .~ ~ ~<.s ~ $. a ::10 . 0..... e .= .. . 4) ~ C'I:S ..s]8 ~~a; ~ .= 0 .::; OJ).... ~ is 5 "O..s ci. cu = ~8 .... "'t:t .. cu c:: 0 ~o"'" ~~"8 . .. .... . o e .. c:: . ~ -.... ;;;8"0 -5J .. E ,,; .... r- C'I:S >. ootfJ.. ..-..... ."t:) ~ . e:.= "" E . 0 e ....= 0""8"0 08..; .=..00 ~oo~ .t::.........,C'!:S cu85"8 ~ cl:: Q.~ ~B cu .... e ~ .~ 0 &1J ~ e 1; E "S.~ cu= '" .- .~ ~ ~.... "" = . cu .... .. E 8 tl.lcuu:: cd.!:: ~ "0 &0 ~ ~ c: cu '" cu E .- E ~..s~ ""~ 0 .5 ~ 'E ~.g~ 1;) Cd = ::I '0'8 E .;;: 0 '" >>N .- I:: U ~<..s cu ~ Ii! ;.E t> ~ ~~ 0.... .... 0 8 c:: o - .- -'OJ .. .... -5j& XI 0 o c:: gl! "0 ~ !; ~ .8.5 . "0...."0 .... cu cu ~ C7.1.~ o,r; 1J..s:a - OJ) 0 0=.... >>.... "" 0....'" ~ ::s..... "0 .... ~VJ.s ~ 0 Ii! 'C .. .E~~ ~ e 8 ~B cu .... e ~ .~ 0 ::1"0 O"e ~E !~ ~s .~ ~ ~= ~CI)"': .. E 8 tI.I Q.) u:: tI.I C'I:S.!:: <.i-i = "0 &0 "0 ~~c: ~ e'~ e e cu..scu cu Q.. c..- ~ Q.. = 0 0 c:: .:= '" 'E .:= ~.~~ ~ ..... ~ E; 1;; ~ "0 ';:3 = E';;: ~ E '" >> '" ~~.s ~ $~ .r>& "0 8 .,.,"" -0 cu ~..s .- .... 1J" cu"':' ~ E cu . .. -58 > .. ~r- 1i!.9 '8 5 1Ji cu ci. ::I .... - ..0.. ~ 0 '';: o 0 ~ ........."0 0-._ = .... '" "O~~ '3 '8 1;j .8 ...... ~ '" .. cu,r; ~ gj ~ J.! !!V')";J .- .... ~ '" 0 0 >>>>cu ~~:E oj cu e ~ 'g. ~ 1; "S. cu .~ "" .. .s .... o ..s S '" cu E! ~ "0 ~. = 0.,,; "0 .. u~ ;!E-< "S."O ~1; ........ "'.... e 0 ; .g :g~ E cu = <.- oj ~ .= & ~ = .. - "" Ii! 'g "" .. '" .. "0 cu = e cu "S. .5 ~ .... '" e ~ "8 ::I oS '" .. II.> .s .... .s .... o = o .~ cu '" .... .!:! = od 5 o ~ . CU'- .s B[ .a-.~ 0= e e E cu .a i5 .~ e ~~ .;;; .8 -B..s ~ s c:; '" <.9 ! tfJ . .... . oj cu e ~ '8. ~ ; "S. cu '" 'u ~ "" .. '" .. 1 cu E "S. .5 ~ .... '" e ~ . ~ "8 .. "8 ~ 'OJ OJ) .5 '" .. -s. E E -= cu . -"0 .!:!.g .. .- !; i5 e-.... '" "" -<~ .. '" .. "0"0 ~ cu 0= .~ cu = E e~ ~ "" .s .5 ..~ II.> ..s~ .5 e .~ ~ .... ...; a. ~ = ._ cu .>! = E ~ e.~ "">>::1 '" .. 0" . "" cu = .... .. 0.... = o .. :'=tI.IQ.. ~t1!J cu OJ) 0 .= 8 ~ E-< "" "" Ei.s 5~ .- .... 'OJ ~ ....i:::= .!:! ~ II.> ~ 0.5 = 0 '" .- .....J!! 1i!~s ~ ~ .~ .. ....:>- .6 ~ .. cu- t)1U.a c::.=u cu o ~ .... 2! = = 0 .. O'~ ~ .....!!.~VJ ~ a. u .: .. :~ .s .~ ~..~& ::I "" ~ Ei ~.ff ;=....:s C,) ,s c.'a =~t)~ !S:i~"" .. .... 0 o cu cu cu = ~ 8~ 'E: =- -B ! J-/?J/ ~ i ; . . i r.- '. II. @ ! I [? ! i D +--~ . II: ': u.... <- n en - I ~ f I I i 2i i ~ n ~I I ~ ~ ~ ,. ~ ~ , J ."'~ 1'i " ~ U~ ~ I i m '. . . .. I 1\"''( ~; ~; i~ hd:' of' ::~~.i -$ 8 j ~ : @ .. ! ~! di I i I I I f~ \ ~~ \ ~I ~ J / @ ! ~ ~ Third Street I ~ i 11101111 emu:- .1111111:: lilli' I~ I I I I , . U) . ~ I - -3 I S I ~ ~t I ! l i i I ! I I I I 1 I ,~ ~~ ~ IIII j I I ~ . i ! i H ,~ I I I i I ~ II j i I I . , ~4'-1/ - " t II \1 \1 \1 \ '\.1 i~ I I I a I .. ....~... Ii';:, ..... U -.. -llofi .. ;-: E~ I: i" :: I "r Ij~ _.:!~ 0 - = I , ..- u E=~-':i IS .. ~ii i' .i .Mi . ':~ .... .. ..II i 1- ::.. 1:-1; .~ i .I.. t - ':1-2 I.. I ...-= ,0 I f~ 0., Ii :;. -~ Ii >> . .. 6< :!: 10 ~i II: ..- -I; .. - e-. 0" . .1 .. II 10... i .. II - .... t -~. . .. 1:~ ....'" J.w ..- ':it': I 00" t~..= :! -~ 0 ... DO" 0 .' o ~I; I ~...! ",oJ ..- 1 ..:: :;.. c" .I'" -- -11.....1: .... I.... ! .. .. t,; -.. .. -u _ .- .... .. -to ~:: .. "''' IE c. t .. .. ..- t.M:-:~I- ..- ...... - t.... -0 .... .. I; I - "J: .. u g,- t . .... a .. .. II 1 "" !i ~ .. - t.. 01'0 ~.!., .... -..- 15-- '"' 'V ....0 c... '0" .,; ..: .. .,; ..; .; j .,; 0. ... ~ .. ... ~ '" i , ~ I~ t;! - _I'; .. .. I Ii -, Eo c , . I _N ..;... ..; , I 1 I i~ a II r .. i II j :. = .. I . .! ~ ~ ..... - I.. == ~C t _.. ..n I ~i .... ! :i :: !'i · i~ 1 . .. .~ }.. s ..- - -. .. - it I- ii -.. - to: ...1 ..... -- i .; .: , - - '\1 .2 j: 11:0 ';.1' ;1 I; j1 ,~... .. ~:: DB= ..; \1 )1 ">1 I;~ B' 1'1 II Ii i :: 1 .- -t Ii I I; u .. .. if; 1:'01: ~ :: ..1- ."-- .... ..- 51: ~h . :: . I; ~ I '" i ~ ,/ J-J-{ I " . \1 . )1 \1 \1 \1 \1 s~ I I I I I I a I I I I I .. . i-= ... I' i .:.: I'~ ..... ~.... ... . i":; .. ..eM i -.-.-: .:1 i -.. . :: i"" .. -.. ii!j ...- ...... ~- "i .. .- .. ... ..~. '= - . II Ii -.. 'i . . .. . ..- . iMIi '5"1'" ji :E-- ! ... << ! .. - .~ ...~ ":" -.I. ... :-.!~== iii ~ ....~.. i... :: - ". M II- I .:; . f i. .. ..f I.!j ~f i _.I:;. .. ::: ....... a1 ~I;. . :; i!= 1.':.. -i 1i ..... .. ...'': I:t!... M ~I; ...1; .. a ......I . .. .I....~-=~ .! ... S.'! ..O.:!;:~ .~ - E !~ot;; - .~1'1 -~ e! '1 ~ ;; .~ I=-i - M . .... ..-..- iij~ - .... t ~!!- - .. f.:!t! .. gM .. ..- ~ II ~ 'E-. 1-= lit'" ...dl .. . j_J ~_t ~~_f '1-. I5Ii!H - e_ .!.!I.. II .... .. 4010_" ..... -... i .. ;: .. '" oJ ... .. '" oJ :: . i i ~ . \, \1 \ \ \ \ \ \ S~ I I I I I I I I a I I I I I I I t'= ~ ~ ... -., i rat p .:: I~" El. ~i I I 1;:;'1 i: :;~.. I; I; ..5 . I .1.. !~ I; EtH ! :t:~ M'I ....- .. :.. i .. ..... .. ...: -=: ~ ~ g...1 IE -.0;;- . . 1...t I:':; : 11:: I~ ..... . 1:111 .II !Ii - . -~ a ..-- f!~ IJo; ;1 .Ih.. In . .1:1 .... . Ii" ..... h. .15.'" _.1; -=J .1: .." - r .. M .: -=1 fh'::5 n - I::. ..;;.. . il il . t:: =..1 If. ...--- !II~ I; :1"'~ fM-t" .11 ~1 1;1; ~.. " .... ~- .-ii! .- .. ;I,;{ ..~ .. "'1"''' al.l Q';!..= -.. 151 .! = c.. c. '" oJ .. .. .: .. .. .: Ii I i '\ ~ ;I-{-&/ II ~~ a .. i i 'Ii . M J . .. . . . . .~ .. if::1i I -i~:t;; 'i t_:;,!! Ii .I ~ "'.... : "::'&-=1 : ~",..:-" I Ii ;oi~ i -- -.... ;:i=-= t ! i='Z~ ~ - .. ...~.. - Ii""'''''' c a i- 0': .. ....1:- III'U . 0 _.._ u -= M=2~" i "'.c - c - J" ~ .. ." . 'at CO.D,",O .. .: . . .. ~ -,.1 '->1 I Ii '5~ 'i I.. ;..~ _E: i Hi: ..M" ~t~ t ...... .! ~ ~ ... . .. E' E' ill , !!: . - :I - .. ii .... .1= . .. ~ I" c Ii _M .t M_ I. "" .. tti c u.. _ c" .... _ c 1;-;; "M If .; j ... : i i ~ ,,; ~ .~ {; \1 m~ a I~ ~ ~ .. ~~. .. ~ M o. i $] ~ I ..... .. M ~ M .. 'i ;: I " - ! : = \1\ .I ,~ . .. i i ~ II) .. M :I . ii t I' ~{ ~ ~ - - . . :I:: .. .. i ~ ~ " " .. .( ~ .. . 'G () I:;; . ::.: . () .... .. .. i Eo. ~ iB ...: i:= \I:: .. -= )( ,_ t n 0 ..;! a II ~~ , .n ;i - ..- ~. .. (\ l~ .. \ . ... M .. ~ I II{) i i ., ~ . All/' iii \t \ \1 \1 ~I \1 \1 i~ I I I I I I I a I I I I I I I 'I'" ! .; llil . . .. =- .: -!- .. :: U~ . I - ~1: ! ... L~ . . .:,1 J! .. Jct i i 0 -.. .i - ..... . I - .. - ... .. E:t... 0 -.- - -",,- ... .! . . ;; el" I ...... f I!~ f .. .. . - ~ ~I -h I; . .. 'Ii~ .; e ~ .. t - .. t~:. I .. . ... ... = .1' _ . - 8.1' .. . c- Ue: !~5! ! - ..1 J! .I .- .. 'f- c_ .I ....-~ :f .11: -If i!;;til u;:~o ... oX ...... ,- I: "'.. . :...~ ! c...I .; .. .; .; ,; ..: .... .. I; .. :: i - z ~ iii \ ~ II ~ \ '-t i~ I I I I a I I I I "Ii ..- ! 'I Ii !- l'" -I' 'f- .. Ii :J . - d - I... i =: s- a b 1'1 too . f .. . I... n I~ .. -I; II .. 1:'" .:, 0 i) ..I . 1\ .IE .. ... 0 r I -.. ~ .... ...- .., Sl; S e- - II; ! ... ... ..1$ - il' J!i ..- ! -.. I;: -.. - - .. --. n I: ..1 -... ... ih j~ J_ i: ... E~ . :::11: U "~i !1 '1'1 -- -- r-- ...... c.. c. -.... Ii! .. .; .,; ,; ..: ;; .1; :i I i i ~ ~ dfJ -- iii \1 \1 \1 "\\ ~ i~ I I ~ a I ~.~ :. . _&- r.J ~~~ IO! .u" --~ -~ .0 Ii;! ~ . .;!! ::. '=1= ..- ~ . ..- _& .=~J 1.U .& ~ . ~~ ~ ~;; ~ J!"U &- U =~ ~';~ ..~.1 1:; E= :",'- ~ ~M ... E-. M. . -J!~~ r-":... .~i E ';; ~ .-. "'- _iE .. :., = _J!&~ M . f= - .. .. -..- "u. .. J=~'I ='i.fi (:~ - f,,~ J " ~.! . U ..~ ~ u_ OU .. I: .! 5-.: r ~ 'tai' ~ ..._0_ _O~ ~J =:--- J!M- ..0 ......=- ~.~ ...Io:! "M. UM. ~" .. -. ~- " --~ u... . "". _".1:01: _M& M - ~ --. =~f~ -... .I ~- --. E -..::..... ~I: aE1 a. Do_ a A. A.'" ~ :; .. .. .; .,; ~ . 2 ~ ~ i ~ iii ~I i~ a ..... ~ ~I' - '=I"~ ~ .'E - = . I: 'E! _M_ t" ~ ~.t:: ~ E I d .u ~ 'I I; :: .- .... 1 E. .I ... - J~ E.~ ~ . ...I...... "M .. -=..il J= -- t :I :.1 :i'E .11- ;: ti -. (:!=: I U "= .I", . la-i .. .I i ~,. 1:- ~ i%~ - ... Ii .!: ... - .- .. U. -= ;; ....1& 'I;'E ::';i!1 :;'" . ~ . . c! :a 1:.1 51 u. .J! ~~ ~ - J!~ -.- -i2":; i ~.. M. ..~ ... f. II .. ... ... E. i -"0-1: - .. ...1 ....1 t.= ji....-:; uu Jj! (';I i I;: ......... jJ ..:: _l ....... .. .. ~ E. l~ := ..: := - "\ . -, , , " II \1 \1 \1 \1 i~ I I a I I ';;.U~~:!::-I; I; U t' -,I -el--- 15~c i~ ',. -- , _.,..__: I ..0 . I! ...-.... .1_ u_ - ... -... . --I - -- ~-I' ... -- - .. i -~ -i i 'i,;;~ Iii .'t:I'V I..e...... ~o ~ I~- ~"f:::: I i -o:i i: tr~ ~.I ii~a;~~!1 :.1 &.0 ..,.. ~I _if' .. -.... = .I~..I;I;:i!1; -lie r- ..- "=.J_ .. :; J!! c -~ !'!lf~1 ! ..-_ 0 ~ - ~ I r --.. ..- .... . ;!'....= -.... =,; tit Ei.:!-=~l ....o~=~ J':'I;...-tD; J ;~ t ! , ., I;: .:!.~'" j .:: 1-'1 . ...I~_.'i f ".I" . i -I." Ii.... i. i.!.!!i~'":' ~rlf;' lI~i- ..lir i I .. IS-. ._~ - i ,..I .I _'It' Iu: E Ij t.. ....t 5.1:1'":' j .Itl.Y'r.~~I-i~ --I ......~.. .--...... ... - !:iiI1il!E !!~~~~il! .. ......c._..,.. t IIi ~ u! ..._cl_ C -.... .- ..---- .. - roo -- ..,. .... _ u_ 0 J:uih:;yn;JIi J:;I_id~ JE!ttldt ..: .- .. .; ... .. . L{o/ '. . in. Detel"lllination (To be completed by the Lead Agency.) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.......( ) I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED................................................... f>.c::-'i I find the proposed project HAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required........( ) II J] d:r, /e; 9,3 <-A ~"':./ Signature Date For \hi 1"';/ F /'Iv', /'C,v>>JF n-kJ ~"'c.Ji~"'-} (CC'C'/'/'<:<Yc/f WPC 0413p/9459P -25- S'I/ - . . DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION (Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AS 3158) ....:L.. It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources and that a "Certificate of Fee Exemption" shall be prepared for this project. _ It is hereby found that this project could potentially illpact wildlife, individually or cumulatively and therefore fees ~n accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. tl'1 ~~, /9';3 Date WPC 0413p/9459P -26- _ '57/ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EARTH As the site is already developed with a church, there will be no changes in topography, or conditions that could lead to an increase in wind or water erosion. No unique geologic physical features exist on the site. At the precise plan level, the applicant will be required to meet any conditions recommended in the soils study. AIR The project is in conforrllance with the existing Air Basin Plan. WATER This project is not in the Coastal Zone and there are no rivers or wetlands or other sensitive aquatic resources within the immediate area that could be impacted by the project. The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that the developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability letter from the Water District. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The Sweetwater Authority stated that the 4750 GPM fire flow at 20 psi residual pressure for a 2- hour duration, as required by the Chula Vista Fire Department is not available to serve the above-referenced project. The Authority recommends that a fire flow test and a hydraulic analysis be performed to determine the available flow. The existing off-site drainage facilities are surface flow along Third Avenue northward to "J" Street and 33" RCP in "J" Street. Engineering staff have noted that site specific drainage improvements will be needed to adequately convey site runoff to offsite facilities. These site specific improvements are not mitigation measures. PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE The project is in an urbanized area of the City and the site is already developed. There are no sensitive or endangered plant or animal species in the immediate area. The project is in an urbanized area of the City. NOISE The noise study, that was conducted by Hans Giroux and Associates determined that noise changes along the site access roadways do not create an unacceptable exposure, but only increase noise levels by an incrementally small and generally imperceptible amount. Operational noise impacts from project implementation are incorporated into project design by maximizing the distance separation between residences and a landscaped 6 foot block wall along the western site boundary and is included for additional noise protection. Additional operational measures recommended as inclusions to the precise plan guidelines, in effect measures to further mitigate noise impacts include the following: Page I (3/ ...- LUC.CKL No delivery truck traffic shall occur in the alley between the rear of the store and the nearest homes from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. No truck/trailers shall be parked in the alley with any mechanical equipment such as refrigerator/freezer units running during the time from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. The trash compactor shall not be operated between the hours from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m., Monday through Friday, 10 p.m. to 8 a.m. on Saturdays, and 10 p.m. to 9 a.m. on Sunday and holidays. Refuse or recycled cardboard trucks sh~lI not collect waste materials during those times when operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited. Any site use should not create noise levels exceeding 6Sdb by day or SSdb at night (10 p.m. to 7 a.m) at the property line of the nearest residential use. LIGHT AND GLARE As the project is for a general plan amendment and rezone and not for a precise plan, the details of the proposed lighting have not been submitted at this time. However, when a precise plan application is filed, staff will review the project to be certain that lighting will be in accordance with City regulations. LAND USE The current land uses on the site are a church and ancillary buildings. The proposed amendments to the general plan and zoning would permit retail commercial uses on the site. Although this is a substantial change, the mitigation measures that are proposed here would reduce potential land use impacts in the areas of noise and traffic. NATURAL RESOURCES No natural resources are expected to be impacted. The proposal, therefore, is not expected to increase the rate of the use of natural resources. RISK OF UPSET No hazardous materials or substances will be stored on site. Therefore, there cannot be a risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions. POPULATION There is not expected to be an increase in population at this site as a result of the proposed general plan amendment and zoning. Should the applications be approved the predominant land uses will be commercial and it is expected that the future users will already reside in the City of Chula Vista. Page : S~ r LUC.CKL HOUSING The proposed project is not expected to create a demand for additional housing as it is expected that users of the Lucky Store or other commercial uses which would locate on this site already reside in the community; many probably are users of the existing store located across the street. It is also expected that the majority of the future employees are already employed at the existing Lucky and that some of the additional employees that will be needed will already reside in the area. TRANSPORT A nON/CIRCULA nON The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Engineering staff commented that the proposed change in land use would impact the traffic circulation system and as a result required a traffic study. A traffic study was carried out by JHK and Associates. The review included: the analysis of the accident history at this intersection over a three year period (1989-1992), an analysis of the adequacy of the number and location of the proposed project site access points, the storage capacity provided for vehicles attempting to turn into the project site via Third Avenue, and a detailed review of internal circulation and an identification of conflict points with passenger vehicles, delivery trucks and pedestrians, the issue of truck access, minimum turning radius circulation, the adequacy of the planned parking supply, design, and passenger vehicle circulation, pedestrian safety, flow and potential conflict points and recommendations for revisions to the proposed project site plan. Specific mitigation measures recommended by JHK and Associates include: that a median on Third Avenue south of the intersection of "J" and Third be constructed, that a right-turn only lane on "J" Street for the Eastbound to Southbound movement be added, and that a separate left turn phasing at the intersection of Third Avenue and "J" Street be provided. The applicant will be required at the precise plan level to install curb, gutter, sidewalks and street lighting as specified by the Engineering Department. PUBLIC SERVICES A. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fue and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fue station is 1.5 miles away and would be associated with a 2 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. pa~ 3(S ~ LUC.CKL The Fire Department is also requiring standard fire prevention equipment and facilities on-site, such as fire extinguishers. Staff from the Fire Department have also indicated that the fire flow is required to be 4,750 gallons per minute, that fire department access be maintained at all times and that plans should be submitted for a sprinkler system. B. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units mus, respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police Department has indicated that the proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. C. Schools State law currently provides for a developer fee of .$.27 for non-residential area to be charged (Chula Vista Elementary School District - $.12/square foot, Sweetwater Union High School District - .15 square foot). D. Parks . As this project is a non-residential project the project is not covered by the threshold/standards policy for Parks and Recreation. Therefore the applicant is not required to pay impact fees or dedicate park land. E. Energy The proposed facility is not expected to substantially Increase demand on existing energy sources or to create a need for new energy. F. Water The applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservation or fee offset program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS . The proposed project is not expected to create a need for any new utilities or service systems. The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City engineering standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with sewer master plans and City engineering standards. The existing 8-inch VCP in Third Avenue and lO-inch VCP in "J" Street in "J" are adequate to serve the project. A NPDES construction activities permit will be required for this project.e LUC.CKL Page 4.... ')1 .... HUMAN HEALTH This proposed project will not create any human health problems. AESTHETICS As the project is for a general plan amendment and rezone and not a precise plan there are no aesthetic considerations at this time. RECREATION The project is not expected to cause a need for additional recreational facilities as the residents shopping in the proposed store already reside in the City and existing use residential facilities. CULTURAL RESOURCES There are no significant cultural resources in the area. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. While the City is not required to prepare a negative declaration where a categorical exemption is appropriate (Guidelines 15301), as is the case here, the City recognizes that transitional housing is often controversial and that a negative declaration provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the project and to better refine mitigation measures. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project, the amendment of the current General Plan Designation of Professional Administrative to Retail-Commercial and the amendment of the zoning on the property from R-l and CoO to C-C-P is within an urbanized area of the City. The site has been developed for years and a church is currently on the site. There are no waterways near the site or any known endangered species and the proposed project will not threaten or restrict any sensitive animal or plant community. There are no known significant biological or historical or prehistorical resources on the site. LUC.CKL Page 5 ~s1 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. This project which consists of the general plan amendment and rezone of a site does not have the potential to achieve short term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long term environmental goals with the adoption of the proposed mitigation measures and their incorporation as precise plan guidelines. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulat:vely considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. This project does not have the potential to be individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study considered potential cumulative impacts. It was determined that with project specific mitigation measures the impacts to traffic and noise would be reduced to below a level of significance and would not be "cumulatively considerable. " 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project will not cause a substantial adverse effect on human beings either directly or indirectly as it must meet all Code requirements and requirements of various City departments. . . . LUC.CKL Page 6 ~ 51' APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER A. BACKGROUND INITIAL STUDY City of Chula Vista Application Form FOR OFFICE USE Case No. /5 .Q5 -020 Deposit Receipt No. Date Rec'd Accepted by Project No. -. I. PROJECT TITlE LUCKY STOltE 2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description) SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 3RD AND J STREET Assessors Book, Page & Parcel No. 573-320-01; 573-320-45 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROPOSED REMOVAL OF EXISTING FIRST METHODIST CHURCH - REPLACEMENT iITH 50,000 SQ. FT. LUCKY STORE. 12,900 SQ. FT. OF ADDITIONAL RETAIL AREA cON 5.8-ACRE SITE. 4. Name of Applicant AMFRTCAN STORES PROPERTIES. INC. - JEFF GUTH Address 6565 KNOTT AVENUE Phone J1]j) 739-7865 City BUENA PARK State CA lip 90620-1158 5. Name of Preparer/Agent FORMA/JIM HIRSCH ~;.J..L , Address RQW UNIVERSITY CENTER LANE. STE 250 Phone (61Qj 453-1900 City SAN DIEGO. State CA lip 92122 Relation to Applicant PLANNER FOR APPLICANT 6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coordinator. a. Permits or approvals required: . , . . -1L General Plan Amendment ___ Design Review Ap~lication ___'Public Project -l- Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Map ___ Annexation --- Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit ___ Redevelopment Agency ___ Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Map ___ O.P.A. Condo Use Permit ___ Site Plan & Arch.Review ___ Redevelopment Agency Variance Project Area Committee D.D.A. ::: Coastal Development --- Use Permit ___ Other Permit b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator). ___ Grading Plan Arch. Elevations ___ Parcel Map ::: Landscape Plans Precise Plan ___ Tentative Subd. Map ::: Specific Plan ___ Improvement Plans ___ Other Agency Permit ___ Soils Report or,Approvals Required ___ Hazardous Waste Assessment ___ Hydrological Study ___ Biological Study ___ Archaeological Survey Noise Assessment ___ Traffic Impact Report ___ Other ~ WPC 9459P -6- ... j()./ B. PROPOSED PROJECT 1. Land Area: sq. footage 254.600 or acreage 5.8 ACRES If land area to be dedicated, state acreage and purpose. 2. Complete this section if project is residential. a. Type development: Single family Two family Multi family . Townhouse Condominium b. Total number of structures c. Maximum height of structures d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units e. Gross density (DU/total acres) f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) g. Estimated project population h. Estimated sale or rental price range i. Square footage of structure j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided 1. Percent of site in road and paved surface 3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed Jal. a. Type(s) of land use SUPERMARKET AND RETAIL SPACE . b. Floor area 62.900 Height of structure(s) 35' c. Type of construction used in the structure CONCRETE TILT-UP OR MASONRY 8LOCK d. Describe major access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets TWO ACCESS POINTS PROPOSED ON 3RD ST.. ONE ON J ST. STORE REARS ONTO ADJOINING USES. ~IDES ONTO J ST.. FRONTS ONTO 3RD ST. e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided 315 . f. Estimated number of employees per shift 30-35 , Number of shifts 3 Total 90-105 g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and bas~s of estimate ___ 4.000 - LUCKY STORES MARKET INFORMATION h. Estimated number of deliveries per day 6 PLUS VENDORS . WPC 9459P -7- - ~ 0 /" ---:< i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate 2.5 MILES -- LUCKY STORES MARKET INFORMATION j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings PAR~tNG. LOADING k. Hours of operation 24 HOURS 1. Type of exterior lighting TO BF DETERMINED 4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section. a. Type of project b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g.- Square feet of road and paved surfaces h. Additional project characteristics c. PROJECT C~ARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. POTENTIAL FOR AIR EMISSIONS ASSOCIATED WITH AUTOMOBILE AND~IRUCK'IRAFFIC SUCH AS EXISTS' ACROSS THE STREET AT EXISTING LUCKY STORE. WHICH WILL BE CLOSED. 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated YES (If yes, complete the following:) SITE IS FLAT. a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated? TO BE DETERMINED b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? TO BE DETERMINED c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? TO BE DETERMINED d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut 3'-5" IN TRUCK DOCK WELLS Average depth of cut 1'-2' Maximum depth of fill 3'-5' Average depth of fill 1'-2' WPC 9459P -8- - 0/- 3. Wil 1 there be any nohe. generated from the proposed project sUe or from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent land.uses? POSSIBLE NOISE F~OM LOADING/SERVICE AREA 4. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical appliance, heating equipment, etc.) ~TANnARD HEATING AND COOLING DEVICES ASSOCIATED WITH GROCERY STORES 5. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres) NONE - SITE HAS EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS ON IT 6. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe the nature and type of these jobs. RETAIL AND SERVICE JOBS 7. Will highly fllllll1able or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or- stored within the project site? NO 9. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by the project? -61&00 fP 8.000 APPROXIMATELY. TRAFFIC STUDY ~ILL BE SUBMITTED TO VERIFY INI'\j WE KS. Describe (.if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project. and their points of-access or. connection to the project site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. POSSIBLE STREET WIDENING TO BE DETERMINED BY TRAFFIC STUDY 8. D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. Geoloov Has a geology study been conducted on the property? . YES (If yes, please attach) Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? YES (If yes, please attach) 2. ~ydro 1 oav Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? (If yes, please explain in,detail.) a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table? NO b. Are there any watercourses or drai~age improvements on or adjacent to the site? NO . WPC 9459P -9- -~J-/ c. Does runoff from the project site drlin directly into or tOWlrd 1 domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? NO d. Could drlinage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? NO e. Describe all drlinage facilities to be provided Ind their location. SHEET flOW PLANNED TO STREETS 3. NoiSE! a. Are there Iny noise sources in the project vicinity which ..y i~lct the project site? NO 4. Bioloov I... Is the project site in 1 natural or plrtially nltural state? NO b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property? Yes No (Plelse attach 1 copy). c. Describe all trees and vegetation on~ the site. Indicate. locltion, height, diameter, and species of trees, Ind which' (iF Iny) will be removed by the project. A NUMBER OF PINE TREES ARb . n~rTnllnllC: TDI='J:'C: I='YTC:T ON 4\TlT TT HA~ NOT RFFN-DrnRMINfO~YEt:HOW MANY Will RFMAIN AFTER DEVELOPMENT. 5. PISt Use of the Land I. Are there any known historicll or- archeological resources located on or near the project site? NONE KNOWN WPC 9459P b. Are there any known plleontologica-l resources? NONE KNOWN _ c. Have there been any hazlrdous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? NONE KNOWN d. What was the land previously used for? t:HIIRr.H FIRST UNITED METHODIST -10- - (; 3 /' 6. Curr@nt land Use a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. 10 IUILDIIIGS INClUDING: THE MAIN FACILITY CONSISTING OF A CHURCH WORSlfIP AREA. OFnCES. a..ASSIIOCIM BUILDINGS AND COURTYARD. A ~STORY IIOOD AND FRAME STUCCO BUILDING WITH PlAYGROUIID. VOLLEYBALL COURT. AND PARKING IS LOCATED DUE IlEST OF THE MAIN CHURCH FACILITY. TWO IIOOD-fRAIIE RESIDENTIAL UNITS ARE LDCATED FARTHER TO THE !lEST ALONG THE !lEST PROPERTY LINE. b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. North ACROSS J STREET - EXISTING LUCKY STORE AND CONDOMINIII4S South MASONIC loosr AND POST OFFICE East ACROSS 3RD STREET - OFFICES West SINGIF FAMILY HOMES 7. Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) 2 b.- Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so~. how many and what type?) R PFOPLE - CHURCH AND PRESCHOOL STAFF 8... Please provide any other information which may assist in- the. evaluation of the proposed project. A PRESCHOOL IS PRESENTlY OPERATED ON THE SITE FOR 125 CHILDREN. NOT ALL THE CHILDREN ARE ON SITE AT THE SAME TIME. THE CHURCH PRESENTlY HAS 4 SERVICES A WEEK WITH ABOUT 400 PEOPLE TOTAL ATTENDING ON SUNDAYS. COMMUNITY GROUPS PRESENTLY USE'THE CHURCH IN THE EVENINGS. . WPC 9459P -11- -~~, E. CERTIFICATION ~~ , Owner/owner in escrow* or I,~P' C 'ht1'Y1tvv! 1rJltrn It / . Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting has been included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. DATE: /~/tz- . *If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. L~-t,?,4N 5~.... /::;,,c,,,(';',J. he:. . ~. WPC 9459P -12- - & {, .,.- w -t- ::J Z W ~ T-PR I ~ ~ . , I 1--111 U ./ -- _l._ -/il / " MITSC""'HER ST. Y - -- ...,~ I I --- -Ifl i --- PL - ----< '-( I - I-- ell ---- --- -- T !e - is --- -- ""1 < ~ - - ,..---- --- \./ - ~---- ~---~ PL -~--- - ~--- - OJ ECT ~~1;"~'" . , , , , , , -J- "- - --- -- !e --- -- -- - - - II: II I I-- ICENlNEY ST "-- - to - - - I \ " - ~ B I&. -I(" W ::J Z W ~ ----- ---- II ----- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --- ----- ---- ~ ..,.-- "1-_ ---- r- -,..-- ---- -~ -T-r- T'-I.,.-- --T --1 I I I 1 -rl STREET I I L ..;1- ~ a:: ~ c a:: 5: ~ i !! u ..J -r-w I I I I Q II I , STREET ---- I I _U_ . I- I , o 75' 300' Approximate Scola 8 NORTH EXHIBIT A LOCATION MAP -fo~- II "T w -+- ::J Z W > -< -FPR ..L....J ~ 5j h ), J r- ", I I Li ---.1..- ------- 1----- T---j~ r MITSC,i'ER ST y---- ~-- / ---- -- -- ~t r ~ ___ ~l I I w --- ~ ~-- ~ ---- -- PL / ~-- ---- I' I l...- I-- (I) --. ----- ------ 1--- , ~ is -- f---- ~- - -- ""1 - t-- z --- --- --- ----- < ~ - I-- w --- --- ------ \./ r---- ::J --r--- ~ 1--. --- I-- ~---- Z 1.1A11ONPL _.J-___ W ~-- 1--- ---- ~ --- --- ---- /T r-- f---r--- 1--- -- f-'- - . I--~ 1--, I <;>,~ ~~T-~.ITE"" -- -I' T.,-4--. ...- i i! i ! ~-rl ; i "J" "- STREET i I - --- I- _1..._ I - -- -- ~ --- --- _oJ_ = ----, --- -. --- - - ~ -. a: i - - - 1f - a: i /' a - --- - KEARNEY ST - 8 KEARNEY - - /- - -. - -- - I ~ c - I ....- \ a: :z: :E .....-- ~ I ... -- ;) - / :z: () - ~ I-r- iD i c , '- i : i I ! ! i ! "K" " STREET I I -T -- ~L I I ----- _U - , I , ~ :I: ~ ::J o u.. , , '0 75' 300' Approximate Scale 8 NORTH EXHIBIT B TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP - II Vjew of F:iJ:st M:tl'alist C1urch (cn-site) fmn "J" StJ:eet. . ~'~'~'-___~~. -~-~ ..-.-, "'-':"- - .~-~-_--_.- " ~.., -.,._"-c_ ......;.:...,-.:.,...,.-:. :.;. '-,-~ ""...;;..'P._~..~--"....- . --- - - - .....-=:-~~~~ '. .. - ~ -:.~-' View of F:iJ:st M:tl'alist C1urch (cn-site) fmn "J" StJ:eet. EXHIBIT C-l SITE PHOTOS - f /?5<' '" II View of First Methodist Church (on-site) from center of property. .- ......., ~ View from "J" Street (looking east) of existing Lucky store. EXHIBIT C-2 SITE PHOTOS - . II . View from "J" Street of condominiums (to the north). '-. .. . .. ,,~:;~"-~;''frf!~'~-~. u -- ..'~~i?;'~;,,~~?;~"~~'-~-~" . ';~~- View from property edge of Masonic Lodge (to the south). EXHIBIT C-3 SITE PHOTOS . 17U- , View of residential uses (to the west) and Post Office (to the south). View from property edge of residential uses (to the west). EXHIBIT C-4 SITE PHOTOS - " " - .0 . ..",:,-;:.,., . - - - .~,.,... .-. ., -' ~ , ., -"-. "", ". .....-.1f'- .'- ...... _...-..'"....- -:- . -").. ..~~ View of office/retail (to the east and northeast) along Third Street. " EXHIBIT C-5 SITE PHOTOS -7;2 - nm ~ ~ H~ iiI ij; ~ ~~~ E ~ ~ ~f 5 ~o ~ ra ~~ r~F , S ~ " t ~., ~ m ~ -I ~ "1 o rn r;:= , i ;;=::.: ~I 1400mm . , I . ~ ~ "", ,. '''''''~'' ~<"<~ 0:. " ,. . r~ ,.,. , " .' . " . ."'. , :I .. \\ I \\ I \."~J g :~ ffi ~~., em .:~~' ~ 't~<' , 0,' '-h' ~ ,. , ',' '. I " E ,. I . i I: ro, '. ~. if' " \. ~" c:.~~~ 4 . .. '\. f.' , ,o-,OD t . :. t. o. -~~ . ... ij ( J.ft'\Ua 'IIor.1c ') .L:;3'8.L9 O'8IHl. c.., CD -I :;u m m -I -13- THE CITY OF CHUU VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT S t:J tement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will requIre discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other oificial bodies, The following information must be disclosed: . 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contr:lct, i,e~ contractor, subcontractor, material supplier, AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES. INC. 6565 KNOTT AVENUE BUENA PARK. CA 90620-1158 ~ .;.. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership. list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 3. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards. Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months'! Yes_ No _ If yes, please indicate person(s): :: Please identify each and every person. including any agents. employees. consultants or independent contr:1c:ors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. FORMA 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER lANE. STE. 250 SAN DIEGO. CA 92122 1>. Have you and/or your officcrs or agents. in the aggregate. contrihutcu more than S 1.000 to a Counciimemhcr in the current or pn:ceding election pcriod'! Ycs No If yes. SIatc which Counclimembcr(s): ~ is uc::fincu ~.s: "AII,Y mcii\'idunl. /irm. ,"a-pnrtlJ('r~'ilip. joim "('1I1urt, nJ'soc/{lf;n". social club. frnlCntni art!flmzarwn. r:orponlllolJ. ..'llill'. /r:tst. fL'cen'c''', ,\;.'ntiicar,'. tillS (Imi all," Oliler eOl/my. CIlY ilnd cml1ltry. ('10', mw,iCll'o/in', du'/riel or "filer pom:cnl .\UiU.iln,HtJlI. .1" ,::)\' olller '..."1'O!lp or comhillllllOlI lICfl1l~ (1J a wrrt." ~(JT:. AlW.ch ~~;.luilionJl p~gcs as nCl'~ssarYI :):o:~: /~2-IrL /~ '''l'( ~1~/'" Case No. IS J13-02CJ CITY DATA F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT Co C>..\-..,d.. ~-\ . 1. Current Zonina on site: North South East West g-:t~~~~~~~/~)- 2. ulll \"0 Is the. project compatible ~ Plan land Use ~m? ~ ~~-:r ~ ~~ .JV\ ,,- U" ~ ~ O:oc1~~\C\O.,o.~~"" . Is the project area designated for conservation or o~en space or adjacent to an area so designated? ~ Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? ~ (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route.) 3. Schools . If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: tJd-Clpp/lcClb/(;.J Students Permanent Temporary Current Generated CaDacitv CaDacitv Enrollment From Proiect School Elementary Jr. High Sr. High 4. Remarks: ~~,:-I ~~. V) ~q. ~I Director of anni~ or Rep esentative A.{j ~~ /99,Y Date WPC 0413p/9459P -8- _1 f'- t YS-5SZf G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Case No. T.~g -D2() 1. Drainaae a. Is the project site within a flood plain? ~. If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary ~/A . b. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? t:;tJ~ r::u:w -rh "nf1/l.1::; Ai/EJJvF- ANt'> -r-n II'J" 9r(Jn::r c. Are they adequate to serve the project? NO. If not, explain briefly. ~~_I".IFlc.. 'N>~.I4.C~ IMPkVI:J.tF.,.,.." WILL-BE 1.11#'.,:';r)1Q) 7?J ~~<rUA-r'W1 v /I_IlIVF/' SITE r.uI.lhFF 'T't> ~'7'E J:;4I!.1UT7ES. d. What is the location and description of existing off-site draina~e facilities? SUI!R.GF: II!'U:>~ AUJ/Jb T7+fRl:> A-"..,LI!JE. ALOIlTHhlAIZ:b -n "<(T' ~ M.lb ~~ "C"/p IAI ",T CT-rJITI/"'I. e. Are they adequate to serve the project? y~. If not, explain briefly. ~io.. 2. TransDortationC~ /AJ ~ V(;E "',toe.. 5ft;;A/'F'~ /Mp,4G,71fE 71QI.ffl~C,(I!&UI.""'r;. S~. ~J It T7lI+FFlc. 'MPf>,&.T" ~TW)Y 1$ R.E.QU,tfl.eJ:>.. a. What roads proviae primary acceSS to the proJect? WPC 9459P b. What is the- estimated number of one-way auto ~rips to be generated by the project (per day)? c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after project completion? Before After A.D.T. L.O.S. If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly. . d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If not, explain briefly. -14- -110- Ys -55'1 Case No. I"<-4:S-0Z-D e. Are there any intersections at or near the point that will result in an unacceptable Level of Service (LOS)? If so, identify: Location Cumulative L.O.S. Is there any dedication required? If so, please specify. f. g. Is there any street widening required? If so, please specify. h. Are there any other street improvements required? y~ If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary J improvements. llo.l ApO>'.,..,o........ "'rr.) -r-++ot;.t;:. 4Tr2~ lMPtz.DvIl:f'0.4.r~ "'t?:. 'RC: 1"'''..AJ.TI':lr~ II<J. /Hili: ~Clt:::.. 'MPArf:::r <::""~b"" "'TJ..I.EAPI't..rr.Jl4..tI/ WfL.L /' ' "r 1Z..F:'fUI2rD' 77J 1A1~11 c-UPA t:..tJ'M""tP C:;fl':&WA.-1 IE c:rJl!~ , , , t-IGI-I-77tJ& Cf7:. . 3. Soils f a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the . project site? NO. b. If yes, specify these conditionS.If/6H:LY 7C> vU<;Y J..f/GIH..'j €XPA1J<:;1fh: 50//...5 (A/, Upp~JZ 1/1=1='F:r. I--/r;lAJrI#'Jl, T1ftE:. $nlLC. RE~ 'Nr;:./cAn:J:; T'H;t:t;r 1f+1<C. A-WLICSE.. CcN'Prnot-J CAN &Eo /.ffT7a.A7tt> fFT"H"E. ~'s 'PE.CRvfM€Nl1'..T7&4SAPE~~ c. Is a soils report necess~ry? 1-10. ~Sofc...'5 ~ WA-{;PRrJv'(Pr-t:>. 4. Land Form a. What is the average ~;!R slope of the site? Zr,; What is the maximum ~ slope of the site? 3% b. 5. Noise 6. Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required of the applicant? lHJ~l.1r"'IhJ. A 7PA~/C.-(ZIU.A-rt!':l:> "'01_<': ~Y'~rs IS ~rli?E/) WE: W AI-.! IN~E. If'oJ. 7J?A.~rc. f#L-UMC 8y 'f"1!cm$El:> Waste Generat i on rtu>~Gr ( I.foco C::;U~E,e5~Y) How much solid and liquid (sewage) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day? Solid 12>8 lIM;. p~ MY /",r~!"E ~ ~~~/~y (,oUxJ) Liouid 6VEJZ ExIS'r,N& Ap,>teovtt>i.NJl:,~. . What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site? ID" A+lr-, 2/" V/,_P~ IN ".T" ST7u:E'r ^'-Ii:> B .yc;.p lu TJ.+/f2I) AWHilE. Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? YE:~ WPC 9459P -15- -1~~ YS-5Sof .. Case No. .IS..q:,-o.;!V 7. Remarks Please identify and discuss any remaining mitigation measures, or other issues. U- JJ OJA~ 6tl..1.J 6.L y.!lr lIt.L.Jd /Z.1HfJ'~1 a.:z..A potential adverse impacts, c. lit 1"112& /7-~h~ Date City E ineer or Representative . . WPC 9459P -16- ~ 15' Case No. IS.. Cj3 -02.0 H. FIRE DEPARTMENT 1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? AnI! what is the Fire Depart,ment's estimated reaction time? /,:r ,..oL,cs ,;],.M;N 2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for the proposed facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? )/~S 3. Remarks ;;2 tv, /~Wl F4're Marshal /d-/p/C;d- Date , {\ WPC 0413p/9459P -12- ---11- CHULA VISTA FIRE DEPARTMENT BUREAU DF FIRE PREVENTION PLAN CORRECTION SHEET Address ~~ i ..:.J' Sr. Plan File No.73~~2.QChecker J.hml:. Date 1d-/;-/7d- Type Constr.JI7-N Occupancy g'd- No. Stories I Bldg. Area ~tJnJ t/1 . The following list does not necessarily include all errors and omissions. PROVIDE AND SHOW ON PLAN: 1- 7~l "c&,L<;' A /.h~: ;7ti..$ /~u~ - 47SlJ w ~ bE /<.fcLvc....LJ . ,_cArE YN.:v,L/.../lM. - ,..2- -- /1/<.'1 ~-I-//'-€jU"S j, ~ 5 / ,;L ,4 /tJ ~ L J1- ;t'd A-~ /.) ,. ~< - "''''~;.J ON ?V/H<' /^"' .4c.C.ESS ,.'ht..F ~ ~ff' f/ €-V-~'::"rv'/5/'U . G...rc;~1.) 7~ -/). . , =s - S- rT: ~"" Ao~ ~ , / 7Zrv'i. L c/,S//fNU ,.vc T -k ~- /:;/z f fiLl. dE)p/M.T/'?b<.-'T /k-<-.ESS k~s. ~ ke. ,,<--fA?:V 7-H/~ r- D #T 4- ~5 ;;;""S ~r? &'fO. S/.cvV.hE ~6r>;77l.cJ ,~,-t. fP~;"Lb..-t ~ J;s.h- H~5r,he C"E.A..-/~LLy .H<vf./,.'- FPB-29 - <to /' - .< . Case No. \S.Q3.0W H-l. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. Is project subject to Parks & Recreation Threshold requirements? If not, please explain. --t ~:> . ~'). ~, f"t' . 2. How many acres of parkland are necessary to serve the proposed project? 3. Are existing eighborhood and community parks near th roject adequate to serv the population increase resulting from t s ,roject? Neighborhood Community Parks 4. If not, are parkland de ations or other mitiga ion proposed as part of the project adequate to erve the population increase? Provide land? Pay a fee? 6. Remarks: // / / / Neighborhood Community Parks 5. To meet City requirements, will. .~~7 Parks and Recreation Director or Representative \ to .1 ~'2- Date WPC 0413p/9459P -13- - ~ (- Sweetwater Union High School District ADMINISTRATION CENTER 1130 Fifth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91911-2896 (619) 691.5500 Division of Planning and Facilities J/ _J~~ December 9. 1992 Ms. Maryann Miller City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. CA 91910 Dear Ms. Miller: Re: IS-93-020/Removal of Existing First Methodist Church and Replacement with Lucky Market The above project will have an impact on the SWeetwater Union High School District. Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to Government Code No. 65995 (Developer Fees) prior to issuance of building permit. Sincerely. fj!m~/0&~ Thomas Silva Assistant Director of Planning 1S/ml -s~~ BOARO OF EDUCATION JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS. Ph.D. LARRY CUNNINGHAM SHARON GilES PATRICK A. JUDD GREG R. SANOOVAl SUPERINTENDENT JOHN F VUGRIN, Ph.D. CHULA VISTA ELEl\1ENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH December 10, 1992 /), J{.,/ /. ,-, ',' 'I~'- Ms. Maryann Miller Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: IS-93-020/FA-606/DP-979 Project: Removal of Existing First Methodist Church & Replace with Lucky Market Location: SW Corner of Third Avenue & J Street Dear Ms. Miller: This is to advise you that the project, located at Third Avenue and J Street, is within the Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from Kindergarten through Grade 6. District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of 3 - 4 percent over the past several years, and this is projected to continue. Permanent capacity has been exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are being utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District also buses students outside their attendance areas, both to accommodate growth and assist in achieving ethnic balance. State law currently provides for a developer fee of $ .27 for non-residential area to be charged (Chula Vista Elementary School District - $ .12/square foot; Sweetwater Union High School District - $ .15/square foot) to assist in financing facilities needed to serve growth. Since developer fees currently allowed under State law provide approximately twenty-five percent of the facilities costs to house new students, the District encourages developer participation in alternative financing mechanisms to help assure that facilities will be available to serve children generated by new construction. We are currently utilizing Community Facilities District (CFD's) as one method to help fund this shortfall. Participation in a CFD is in lieu of developer fees, with school mitigation paid by the homeowner in the form of a special tax. _ S?J/ December 10, 1993 Ms. Maryann Miller Page 2 RE: IS-93-020/First Methodist Church @ Third Avenue & J Street The subject project is located in the Rice School attendance area. This school is presently operating a't or near capacity, and an alternative financing mechanism, such as participation in or annexation to a Community Facilities District is recommended. If you have any questions, please contact this office. Sincerely, ~C[ ~L'- Kate Shurson Director of Planning KS:dp cc: Jeff Guth Jim Hirsch IIoiJ1'main'irngr'msw-c:smallcorn - ~.;- THE CIIT OF CHULA ~'ISTA PARIT DISCLOSURE STATEMENT St;Jtement of disclosure at ceruim ownership interests, payments. or campaign contributions. on all matters which will requIre discretionary action on the part of the City CouncIl. Plannmg CommIssion. and all other official bodies. The following information ~ust be disclosed: I. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract. i.e.. contr.lctor, subcontractor. material supplier. AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, INC. 6565 KNOTT AVENUE BUENA PARK. CA 90620-1158 , If any person identified pursuant to'l) above is a corporation or pannership. list the names of all individuals owning more than 1 Oo/} of the shares in the corporation or owning any pannership interest in the partnership. 3, If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or benefici1uy or trustor of the trust. 4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards. Commissions. Committees and Council within the past twelve months'! Yes_ No _ If yes. please indicate person(s): , Please identify each and every person. including any agents. employees. consultants or independent contractors who you h<1ve <1ssigned to represent you hetore the City in this matter. FORMA " 8910 UNIVERSITY CENTER LANE, 5TE. 250 SAN DIEGO. CA 92122 ii, Have vou and/or "our officers or ::eents. in the uecrcc:Jte. t:Ontrihuteu more than $1.000 to a .. ... .... ... COl1nclill1emher in the currcnt or pr'~ceuing election penou'! Yes ~o If yes. state which Counctlmembcr( s): ~~ 1$ definet! :.IS: ",-IIIY IIIcJl\'/d/lt1I. lirm. rupnrmcr. illP. )01111 \'('11111/'(', nJSOClfIl1nl/. sacwl cluh./rntcmnl ()r~.t1ntzntf(m. (u1]mrmioll. "t;!e /":/51. I"('CC1\',.,.. .\i'lIliICl11(', fillS tllI([ (//1\' 011"" {{1f.1f/\', (If.\' lIJ/a coumr". fI"', mI/lJfCl!w/lfY. dam" or m/lL'r poill:,'nl .wbain:aolJ. , ,::1\' ;III/(.'1' t'1'Ol1p ur CnmmlJ(/IIOII lICIfII,:! (lJ (/ W1/t. 'uT:. AtI:H:h ;1~~llion:J1 p:I~C~ as nCI:Css.11~'J ':L,c: /~AL <~/.# -r C~~ ~'m{r~ <>1 dmfbctm/af'Plicant !' '( ~ { ...i}:\lr:I~'Il11' ;::':~:IL';II:: f. () ., . "..II ~ J ....... . SWEETWATER AUTHORln 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91912-2328 (819) 420-1413 FAX (819) 425-7469 '.'r: r: 1 'j: ~:' '" " GOVERNING BOARD SUE JARRETT, CHAIRMAN BUD POCKLINGTON. VICE CHAIRMAN WAYNE W. SMITH EDWIN J. STEELE GEORGE H. WATERS MARGAAET A. WELSH CARY F WRIGHT WANDA AVERY TREASURER ClAN J. REEVES SECRETARY-ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE December 14, 1992 Mr. Douglas Reid City of Chula vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula vista, CA 91910 Subject: WATER AVAIIABILITY PROPOSED 50,000 SF LUCKY MARKET AND 12,900 SF RETAIL A.P.N. 573-320-01, 573-320-45 CASE NO. 18-93-020 SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 1992 Dear Mr. Reid: This letter is in response to your Notice of Initial Study for the subject project within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There is an S-inch water main located on the east side of Third Avenue and a 6-inch water main on the north side of "J" Street adjacent to the proposed development. Our records indicate that there are three existing water services to this property. Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 139 map which shows these facilities. At this time, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to provide fire protection - for this project. As plans develop for structures, the Owner must submit a letter to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, this project may result in the need for new water systems or substantial alteration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your agency work with ours to determine if the existing water system is adequate to meet the added demands prior to issuing a building permit. If the owner provides the required fire flow information and enters into an agreement for water facility improvements with the Authority, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from a maximum of 62 p.s.i. to a minimum of 37 p.s.i. . - ~~--' A Public Agency, Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas Mr. Douglas Reid subject: Water Availability December 14, 1992 Page 2 If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at 420-1413, ext. 239. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY ~~ ~y~ +- Acting Chief Engineer JLS:RC:rms Enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 139 map pc: Mr. Jeff Guth American Stores Properties, Inc. 6565 Knott Ave. Buena Park, CA 90620-1159 k:\laur;e\letters\luckymkt.ltr -<jf)~ I "I" c.-~... .., .. Z2~"'IMn ..... I I I I '.1.'11 I I ,'II&)'j'r T....j ~ .'e.4W~~t>"7 " : ~: ...: == I :. I : I .:: ! ... !S. :~ ~... ! e. :.,1 :-" :~ a~ 1 1 I 'i-. JtCHER~S: S lJ B. i iii p. I . I 2 '7!1 ,> i ~SI ..... ~ IOMI I i I ~ 50' IAIhPfT II.'.~II I 'L~,.,,, L '"jj I ~ " . .' z II ~ I! i ; : I l' . ~ I ! . r. f-- , I , 47! /4' , ~..:/ ~' '" ~ ~... .. 1'-"1' '\ 4..... . .... 1=1 ,~ / .,.....tIJ. 50 ; ..... Il"j ~ I i h ...Yi~".. ! ..- .. . " ,1 I .~ 1Jr'" /., ....,...)1' L";.cw 'el urln~h... ...~( ,.;:-.. ... I-..!II.."J' ~ I 'i:i '''4 . - . 1/ "'1\ \t. ...." -1 .Jh. 53 . ~ .j15~ ....,.;~ ......: ~ I~ ....:.- ~(_ ,liLU ~I p. 23 0: 20 ~. 7 rt'I - I ....... ~ /' '''I''''~''''''-' .,...".. :::: I 1 If 24... Z If 1_ ...,...... I - ct ,- 0 J d :J. ~.' S ~ " ~ ....-.1-1 I., .. . ,~~ .......N' Z........ ........ <OJ .39t "i .37~1 zo.. II I- 9 II. lal>>taro! .""'1 26Z N 11 e : I~,O~ ~ : ..loa." c - c:r~ _......... '6 ..J' 01 II ; 9 ,~..- - lo. > ~ IDJ~/,r: ~ 0........ 15 27 ....... , , ~~ t~ f -1 ""a...., 13 - 2B .......... 12 "tt5J Zi" " ~ N.. ?9" ~ / c ....aw;t ~ .. ; IU""'.C".~/WQ'" 8 3v ~~T.T~I~ i ...: ~ .eif"! OZ~ ...... '" MANur- N".- cr .' . -;; p'n~ '. .....!2./ ~ ~ ~ or! 34 33~ . . , ...ru. 14 I , I , I 15 I I ):J- s r~~7~ ~''-N'80 WO.no_ - ... ...... ''f.. ')0'. ........1 r.. M" ..... - . i- :1 . . . ] ~.. 6' ...- i .!.. .:! 138 1-'.". .. ..0.AlIO.1 .-. 1-':".'1' 'W.o.AZliIOOI I.., WO"7' . ':1Ja1W,O,u"JI n.'~t I'.....r"",..' wo...rl200 IIZ-.'." .OU" :t~;~" c..._.~ 'c. .. , ...... ...to' I.~', wo ~ II".: I T "..t' I . , ~ i + I . 1_,; ~. 1 .. Ii ~30; '= . , '- I I C "'71'" ~ 'Z . .. ttl" ,. ~ on.. z i - .. "Sf . "1' L ~~':I hOl!I"t .. - . " ~ . ......~~ ::::> "".,... 2; .... :>- '.' .... :c( _'7 WQ.AtOQJ ..".. PHI .....L'.. t'!_ i:1, ~.Jrll f~Jt&. ,;,tJ~t - IINI C"r) IfI&I ......" .......~ g Q) 'f- .:E c\J ~ ".~.Q c:"'O ~ <';1 _....... 0_ ' xl - - nluO [; ro ~ 0 0 (f) ~ g Q) C,) ..... C:.E-..o~5 o c: (!)....... "- :.=_.......(1)<('1.,. ro [;::J'Q. .....g 1:' ::J E "? CI) _cu -;::0., .2 (j) ru.~ :::: -0 COC::'e>-I-I("J ....fr c: ~ r;:; ~ c: ,- 0 c:>r,S! .;; I A . ~";"..~ ]' ~ IIL-Tu , , ~~,~ r:;; ~ 0 _ " ~.SC~I-S .,~ ~! ."';,,, 1 ~ ~ ~~~ II ---<- - - -- . ~ f. = - - ~ ~ At.~<:~1':j1 LA \" ( \/." -'\1 ~~J ,I c;-:I ..., -' ~ '" Dan ...l.. ...1..,,, - o ....,.. j::; IlOoII ~ OUIYCUI .".N.'eo 12-s,,:-~ I ~e.1Je I:,~' .. t 1 . .. . v . J~~ ,f ....... ,-- ...., --r ~"~~"I ~ ~.': --.- I .;:; I_ ....,. -."'11 N .. . .. . &C.4' ,. ......... ..." "".-.ot I .J.~. - ::!: ~.~: ~ ~:~ "',-It....,..'!> "'I&8'f~ 1 :z :: I 11 ~r'S.~--:- nm ------ ~ I .....'".. "'1~1 - ""'~14Q) : ~ "orb' ".,~.. - "'~U'U ~ ' :t d ...... ! "" " ...~~. ~. ....I~~ t ..,:::..;'" -! "'"r.' ;; · -.th - "'';'b.. r- - -- -- ----- ,J ! PROJECT SITE ' ~ 57 :001-. 15 L ...- -- ~ .-.. , ': :;. :';:;;:;:~~:::',r.:.------------2-3 ---T------.~ : -.. -tt ;; '>>&f"Ia ~ I N~.7/. .:;iw:. - 55 ..__....._1_2, . - ~_~'_. ._ S' 8 - ~~.: ,~ . ~.~~ ___ .. m.'\j.:'~w c""'7'CH:tI:': ,. '''c!! -.--. .. . ..- ~i ~ ~ 7." . - ~ . . I ...- I) ~ ~ = .._, .. _ .'1'" I.' :''''.''~ ~ . . ~~:it. .. Eii,j" S .. . ..I...... . .. . . ... ""M' 1~~:::~; . =.....I~JZ ... !II ~ I :!'r'.33 - .' 1413 ! .... uoc t. .' .' ...o.C.CI'"'' '~4Ii' - I< ~ . , ,- --- : " ..... ,~. fret all Nt,,! "'f,U ... ....... ~ ...~, . - ""Uto Q ~ - - ! . . I M h' SUJ ....." ,'U' ..... .-- - r._. .. Giroux & Associates Environmental Cor . '\DtB ) , NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CHULA VISTA LUCKY STORE NO. 257 CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA prepared for: FORMA Attn: Leslie Free_n or Jean Fallowfield 3100 Bristol st., Ste. 100 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Date: March 30, 1993 -'i9- /7744 Sky I'1uk C'irr:Ie. Suite 2/0, IniDe. OIifomi. 92714 . PboDe (714) 85/-8609 . FlU (714) 85/-86/2 NOISE SETTING Sound is mechanical energy transmitted by pressure waves in a compressible medium such as air. Noise is unwanted sound. Sound is characterized by various parameters that describe the rate of oscillation of sound waves, the distance between successive troughs or crests, the speed of propagation, and the pressure level or energy content of a given sound. In particular, the sound pressure level has become the most common descriptor used to characterize the loudness of an ambient sound level. The decibel (dB) scale is used to quantify sound intensity. Since the human ear is not equally sensitive to all sound frequencies within the entire spectrum, human response is factored into sound descriptions by weighting sounds within the range of human sensitivity more heavily (middle A and its higher harmonics) in a process called "A- weighting" written as dB(A). Time variations in noise exposure are typically expressed in terms of a steady-state energy level equal to the energy content of the time varying period (called Leq), or alternately, as a statistical description of the sound level that is exceeded over some stated fraction of a given observation period. Finally, because community receptors are more sensitive to unwanted noise intrusion during the evening and at night, state law requires that, for planning purposes, an artificial dB increment be added to quiet time noise levels in a 24-hour noise metric called the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). An interior CNEL of 45 qB(A) is mandated for multiple family dwellings, and is considered a desirable noise exposure for single family dwelling units as well. Since typical noise attenuation within residential structures is about 15-20 dB, an exterior noise exposure of 65 dB CNEL is typically the design exterior noise exposure for new residential dwellings, schools, or other noise-sensitive land uses in California. Because commercial or industrial uses are not occupied on a 24-hour basis, a less stringent noise/land use compatibility criterion is generally specified for these less noise sensitive land uses. The City of Chula vista Noise Element does not currently contain specific noise compatibility standards, other than those mandated by the State for multi-family residential units. For purposes of land use planning, the City of San Diego has established a complete set of community noise standards. The ci ty of Chula vista currently follows the noise guidelines established by the City of San Diego. These standards establish maximum allowable noise levels for various types of land developments and are reproduced in Figure A. Under these standards, the maximum exterior noise level for schools, residential development, hospitals parks and playgrounds is 65 dB (A). Office buildings, auditoriums and churches may have exterior noise levels up to 70 dB (A). Commercial uses may have exterior noise exposure of 75 dB (A). The City's 1 - 90 ~ TABLE A ON-SITE NOISE MONITORING SUMMARY 01/12/93 (Short-term readings in units of dBA) Location I&g ~ LMi.n LJ..Q. l..U L2.Q. ~ 3rd Avenue 75' to C/L 65.6 78.0 49.5 68.0 66.0 64.5 59.0 J street Near Exist. KinderCare 84' to C/L 64.8 82.0 53.0 66.0 62.0 61.0 56.5 J street at West End of site 110' to C/L 59.1 72.0 48.5 62.0 59.0 57.5 52.5 On Western Boundary 1/2 way between J St. & Post Office 55.3 65.0 48.0 57.5 55.5 54.0 51.0 Southwest Corner Near Post Office 51.8 64.5 44.5 54.0 50.5 49.5 47.0 C/L = roadway centerline Source: LDL Model 700 Integrating Noise Dosimeter, 01/12/93 (1140-1340) .- 9/- noise policy states that every citizen has a right to live in an environment where noise is not detrimental to his or her life, health, and enjoyment of property. Within the policy's implementation provisions, there is a mandate for the city to consider the effects of noise, especially from transportation sources, in its land use decisions to realize the above objective. _" Existing noise levels around the proposed Chula vista Lucky store site derive mainly from vehicular sources on the roadways in the area. In order to better define the existing project site noise exposure, an on-site noise monitoring program was conducted on January 12, 1993 and centered on five locations on the project site: Near 3rd Avenue, along J street, and at three locations near existing homes on the western site boundary. Measurements were taken for 20 minute intervals with an LDL Model 700 Noise Meter. The results from the noise monitoring are summarized in Table A. Although these readings are short-term Leq's while the noise. standard is in terms of CNEL, monitoring experience throughout Chula Vista has shown mid-day Leq and CNEL to be very similar. with a small margin of error, the on-site measurements reasonably well define baseline noise exposure relative to the City's noise exposure guidelines. This data shows that the project area experiences noise levels below 65 dB along 3rd Avenue and J street 100' from the centerline. Even in close proximity to the roadways, noise levels are no impediment for planned commercial development. These levels are, however, in excess of those considered acceptable for residential uses such as those west of the site. Noise levels drop significantly in the interior of the site, such that homes away from J street are protected from traffic noise. The residences directly adjacent to J street, nevertheless, are subject to elevated noise levels that may be exacerbated by continued areawide traffic growth. The traffic generation scope of any future development i~ therefore an important consideration in not sUbstantially worsening the noise environment for these residents. 3 -Cjd--- NOISE IMPACTS Three noise sources are typically identified with urban development such as the proposed Lucky store relocation. Construction acti vi ties, especiallY heavy equipment, will create short-term noise increases near the project site. Upon completion, vehicular traffic on streets around the development area may create a higher noise exposure to Chula vista residents beyond the noise levels currently experienced. On-site activities such as truck del1veries, unloading of goods and waste collection/disposal at the store may also impact homes on the west. Construction Noise Impacts Temporary construction noise impacts from most commercial development vary markedly because the noise strength of construction equipment ranges widely as a function of the equipment used and its activity level. Short-term construction noise impacts tend to occur in discrete phases dominated initially by large earth-moving sources, then by foundation and parking lot construction, and finally for finish construction. The large earth-moving sources are the noisiest with equipment noise typically ranging from 75 to 90 dB(A) at 50 feet from the source. Figure B shows the typical noise emissions associated with specific construction equipment. Point sources of noise emissions are atmospherically attenuated by a factor of 6 dB per doubling of distance. The quieter noise sources will, thus, drop to a 65 dB exterior/45 dB interior noise level by about 200 feet from the source while the loudest could require over 1000 feet from the source to reduce the 90+ dB(A) source strength to a generally acceptable 65 dB (A) exterior exposure level. Existing traffic noise and surrounding structures will somewhat screen temporary construction activity impacts such that the actual noise impact "envelope" will be smaller than its theoretical maximum. Given the close proximity of homes to the west of the project site, noise peaks in excess of 80 dB may be temporarily experienced. Although impacts are short-term, construction of a substantial commercial development very close to existing residences may nevertheless have a temporarily significant noise impact. Construction noise sources are not strictly relatable to a community noise standard because they occur only during selected times and the source strength varies sharply with time. The penalty associated with noise disturbance during quiet hours and the nuisance factor accompanying such disturbance usually leads to time limits on construction activities imposed as conditions on construction and use permits. Weekday hours during periods of least noise sensitivity are typically the allowed times for construction activities if there are occupied dwellings within a 5 f8 /' FIGURE A NOISE LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CHART Laud UIe i. Out/oor Amphitheaters (may DOt be suitable for c:ertaiD typca of music. 2. Schools, Libraries 3. Nature Preacrvcs, Wildlife J>r.orvca 4. Rcsidcntial-Sin~ Family, Multiple Family. Mobile Homes, TllUISicot Housing S. RctilClDCllt Home. Intermediate Care Fac:ilities. Convalesa:ot Homes 6. Hospitals 7. Parks. Playgrounds 8. Office Buildings, Business and Professional 9. Auditoriums. Concert Halls. Indoor Arenas. Churcbcs 10. Riding Stables, Water Recreation Facilities 11. Outdoor Spectator Sports, Golf Couracs 12- Livestock Farming. Animal BrccdiDg 13. Commercial-Retail. Shopping Cooters Restaurants, Movie Thc8tCII 14. Commercial-Wholesale, Industrial Manufacturing, Utilities IS. Aariculture (_pt Livestock), &tractive Industry. Farming 16. Ccmclcrics AIIIluaJ Commllllity Noiae Equivalent Level in Decibcb so SS 60 65 70 75 .,. .,. .... .,. ... .... ........ ... 0:0:0:"' 0:":" :":":": .... ..... ........ ... .,. ... .... ... ... .... :::::::: ::: .,. '" ... . . 0...... ... .... ....... ....... ....... ........ .,. '" ........ . 0...... ... .... . ......... ... .... . " .,. ... .,. ... ::::::: ::::::: , ....... . ....... . ... .... :::::': :':0:':' . . ... . . '" ..0.... . ....... . '0' ... '" ... ....... . ..0.... . :.:: :.:.: ....... . }/\\ ....... . . . ... .. ..... ... ........ ... .... ........ ... .... ... ... ........ ... ... ........ :.:.:.: :.:.:.: .:.:.:. .:.:.:.: .... ... ...... ..' ....... . ....... . '.' ... '.' ... ....... . ....... . . .. ... .... ... .... ....... . ....... . ... .... ... .... ....... . ....... . '" ... :;:;:;: :;:;:;: .... . ... .... ... .... ....... . ....... . ... .... ... .... ....... . ....... . . . ... ... ". ... ::::::: : ::: :.:: .. . .. ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... . . . .. .. . .. ... . . ............ ........ ............ ........ ... '" ........ .... ... ". ........ .... ........ ... ........ ....... ....... ....... ........ ........ '" '" ........ .... :::::::: ::: :::::::: " . . ........ ... ........ ... ....... ....... ....... ........ ........ ........ '" '" ........ ........ :::::::: ::: :::::::: ::: ........ ... ........ .... ........ .., ........ .... '" ... ........ ........ '" '" ........ ........ ........ ... ........ ... ........ ... ........ ... '" ........ ... ........ '" ........ ... ........ '.' ........ '" ........ ........ .,. ........ .,. ... ........ '" ........ . .. ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ '" ........ '" ........ :::::::: ::: '" ........ '" ........ ........ ." ........ ... '" ........ '" ...... '.' '" ". .... ... '" .... :::::::: ::: '" '" .... '" '" .... :::::::: ::: '" ........ .... ........ ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ... .. ........ ... .. ........ ........ ... ........ .... ........ .,. ........ .... .... ............... ....... ........ ....... ....... ........ ........ ..... '" ':':':' ':':':': :':':':' ........ .,. ........ .... ........ '" ........ .... ........ .,. ........ '" '" ........ ... ........ ........ .,. .:':':' ':'" .,. ........ .... ........ .... ... ........ ... ........ ........ .... ........ .... I:": :":":" :': ':" :"1 ......... . ......... . COMPA rIBLE Tbe al't:rllge Doise kvel is sueb lbat iDdoor aDd outdoor .cliYliies asaociMed wilb tbe iIuJd _ may be carried out wilb _DtiaJly DO iD~rfe1'tDa: from Dai#. /NCOMPA rIBLE Tbe ...erage Doise level IS SO seve" lbat coMtructioa costs to male lbe iDdoormvitu1una1t a=ptabk for pedOtmaDce of aCIMu"es would probably be probibitivt:. Tbe 0Ukl0a GlIftIaam' ItOU!d be iDtD/enJbJe l<<ouWor ~ associatod wilb lbe iIuJd _" Source: Progress Guide and General Plan (Transponation 11.........1). - 1'1- FIGURE B TYPICAL CONSTRUcnON NOISE GENERATION EQUIPMENT LEVELS NOISE LEVEL (dBA) AT SO Fr 70 80 90 100 Compaaers (RoUcrs) Front Loaders - co i'j .S " > '51> 0 " ::E (:lj..c " t: o .. .~ UJ " ..c E .~ Backhoes Tractors Scrapers, Gradcrs Pavcrs - Trucks co gJi -"" .s :; ~::c " 11 :.~ '5 ~ ~" ,- 0 " '''' ~:: '" Concretc Mixers Concretc Pumps Cranes (Movablc) Cranes (Derrick) - - Pumps Gencrators .. Comp=rs Pncumatic Wrcnches - o " 1:S e Jack Hammers and Rock Drills !t.e- ! 6- Pilc Drivers (Peaks) (:lj Vibrator ... l! o Saws Source: EP A PB 206717, Envirol1mCntal Protection Agency, Dec. 31, 1971, "Noise from ConstrUction Equipment & Operations" o - - 1J ~ reasonable exposure zone surrounding the construction. site. Because this site clearly meets the criterion of having sensitive recei vers in close proximity, a time limi t on on-site heavy equipment operations is needed to minimize noise intrusion. Given that heavy grading will be minimal since the site is pre-graded, the combination of a limited requirement for heavy equipment operations and a time limit from 7 AM to 5 PM Monday through Friday for motorized equipment operations will minimize sleep disturbance or interference with exterior property enjoyment during evenings and weekends. For purposes of minimizing operational activity noise impacts, a sound wall will be constructed along the western site boundary. The utility of that wall will be enhanced if it is constructed early during site development to also screen out construction noise. Combined effects of time limits to hours of lesser sensitivity and early construction of the sound wall will maintain temporary construction noise impacts at a less than significant level. Materials handling and small stationary noise sources have lower initial noise levels, and their corresponding noise impact zones during later phases of construction are, therefore, much smaller. pieces of equipment are also often smaller (compressors, generators, etc.) such that they lend themselves to placement in areas where existing structures or larger pieces of equipment may screen a portion of the noise transmission. Once the western wall of the store structure is completed, it will act as a further noise barrier to many finish construction noise impacts from the store interior. Except during actual construction of the western store perimeter, noise impact potential will be substantially reduced once the western store wall is erected. Exterior finish construction will also be shielded by the recommended noise wall along the western project boundary. Noise generation during finish construction may thus be audible at times, but not at levels considered to have a significant impact. Vehicular Noise Impacts Incremental noise as it relates to commercial use may be important in terms of commercial activity traffic noise impacting the adjacent residential community. In the case of commercial projects, existing roadway noise impacting the project site is generally not a concern because retail uses are less noise sensitive than residential uses and compatible with noise levels up to 75 dB. One would typically expect the proposed development, by virtue of its traffic-inducement, to create an increase in community noise exposure. However, the increase would be superimposed upon existing roadway noise generation and may therefore not, of itself, create a noise impact that would be individually perceptible near the project area. In addition, this 7 - 96~ is a commercial relocation of a relatively short distance and most of the traffic is not "new". Much of the travel to the site is also expected to be drive-by trips that are already on the surrounding transportation system and would not contribute significantly to noise levels. Changes in vehicular noise patterns were calculated using the FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Model (FHWA-RD-77-108, CALVENO-85 modified). The model calculates the Leq noise level for a particular reference set of input conditions, and then makes a series of adjustments for site-specific traffic volumes, distances, speeds, or noise barriers. The project traffic study shows that future uses will generate 2,516 new trips for the proposed Lucky Store and retail shops. These trips will be fractionally distributed in four different access directions. The number of new trips on individual sections of J Street and/or Jrd Avenue will thus be small. project-related traffic noise impacts were calculated for existing traffic and then for the future "no project" versus "with project" cases. Traffic noise impacts were calculated for a 50,000 square foot Lucky store footprint as well as for a somewhat larger 65,000 square foot alternative. Table B summarizes the traffic noise level at 50' from the centerline of surrounding roadways near the proposed Lucky Grocery store. Along both J street and Jrd Avenue, existing traffic levels are more than 20 times higher than the new additional traffic created by project implementation. project- related traffic noise impacts are therefore masked by noise from existing traffic. The maximum project-related noise impact is 0.2 dB. Although there are no absolute standards of noise impact significance, an increase of J dB or more is perceived by most human receivers as a substantial degradation in the areawide noise environment. The 3 dB threshold is not attained at any analysis location. The incrementally small, individually insignificant, project traffic noise impact creates a correspondingly limited change in the distance of noise-contours for noise-sensitive land uses. Table B also shows the distance from the roadway centerline to the 65 dB CNEL contour, which is the noise level considered normally acceptable for residences and other noise sensi ti ve land uses. The calculations show that the project impact is minimal with the zone of residential incompatibility along Third Avenue increasing by only 1 foot at maximum project impact. A small increase in the magnitude of project-related noise, with the corresponding small change in the area of noise incompatibility engendered by the project, supports the finding that project traffic will create an individually less than insignificant noise impact. Cumulatively increased traffic will interact with projected increases throughout the area. The Chula vista area will 8 - 91 - TABLE B LUCKY STORES OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACT CNEL @ 50' to Roadway Centerline (dBA) 1992 1995 1995 1995 Location Existing No Pro;. 50K Pro;. 65K Prtri. J Street 4th Ave. - 3rd Avenue 62.9 63.1 63.2 63.2 3rd Ave. - 2nd Avenue 61.1 61.4 61.5 61.6 Third Avenue I Street - J Street 65.7 65.9 66.0 66.1 J street - K street 65.6 65.9 66.0 66.0 Distance from Centerline to 65 dB CNEL Contour: J Street 4th Ave. - 3rd Avenue 3rd Ave. - 2nd Avenue <50' <50' <50' <50' <50' <50' <50' <50' Third Avenue I Street - J Street J Street - K Street 55' 55' 58' 57' 59' 58' 59' 58' __ 9t--- experience traffic increases from the intensification of under- utilized lands. Table B, however, shows that the "Future-wi th- Project" noise exposure, including currently anticipated cumulative traffic growth, is not measurably different from the "Existing" condition. There are anticipated increases of 0.2 and 0.3 dB from non-project traffic growth along J Street and Third Avenue. with project traffic noise impacts of 0.2 dB, no road segments will experience cumulative impacts that exceed the 3 dB significance threshold previously noted. Traffic noise impacts from the proposed Lucky store relocation are therefore not considered individually or cumulatively significant. Because the "with project" off-site noise impact is much less than significant, a somewhat larger store similarly creates a minimal change in the community noise environment. Maximum off-site noise impacts for a 65,000 square foot store alternative are 0.0 to 0.1 dB higher than the 50,000 square foot site. Maximum total noise increases of 0.2 dB above the no-project alternative are less than significant. A subsequent site plan developed for the project changed the non- grocery mix of uses proposed for the site. The proposed grocery store was retained at 50,000 square feet, and the Moose Lodge parcel was integrated into the property. Shop space was expanded by around 8,000 square feet and a 4,200 square foot fast food restaurant was added. Off-site trip generation is slightly higher (because of the fast food component) than for the 65,000 square foot grocery alternative. However, since the addition of 15,000 square feet to the grocery store would add only an imperceptible component to the off-site noise exposure, the off-site noise impact of around 12,000 feet in shop and restaurant space will be similarly masked by the existing traffic noise environment. site Operations Noise Impact Grocery stores are generally not perceived as major noise generators, but do sometimes have site-specific noise generation acti vi ties that could be audibly intrusive or annoying at the residential development west of the site. Such intrusion may resul t both from the nature of the noise (motors, compressors, blowers, metal banging on metal, etc.) as well as from the time at which it occurs. Impact potential is exacerbated by the short distance between the grocery store and the nearest homes backing up to the western site property line. Two store orientations were considered in terms of potential impacts on the adjacent residences. The initial site plan called for most receiving functions to be located at the rear of the store along the western wall of the store building. A revised site plan 10 - 11~ was subsequently developed which retained the refuse compactor and the meat receiving door along the western side, but relocated the grocery receiving dock, well and ramp along the north side of the building adjacent to J street. In order to quantify the typ~cal range of noise activity levels at the rear of a grocery store, a noise measurement study was conducted at a market that has a similar relationship to adjoining residences as the proposed Lucky Store at Third and "J" in Chula Vista. Measurements were made for almost two days at an older store in Irvine from a Wednesday evening to around noon on Friday. The measurement location was near the rear property line at around a 60 foot setback from the rear of the store wall. Produce, meat and grocery receiving were on open pads and an open truck dock along the length of the rear of this store. Some car traffic uses this alley to circle the store, but the primary noise source is from grocery store activities. Results of these measurements (in dB[A]) were as follows: 01/20-21/93 01/21-22-93* 24-Hour CNEL Noisiest Hour Time of Peak Hour Noisiest 1-Second Peak Time of Maximum Peak 68.9 73.5 ( 9-10 AM) 97.5 (10-11 AM) 70.8 76.5 ( 9-10 AM) 97.0 (10-11 AM) * - assuming Friday PM was similar to Thursday PM At this older store, the meat cooler refrigeration unit was built into the wall above the receiving door with the compressor running 24 hours per day. Since this represents old construction and noise generation technology, another store was tested on March 9-10, 1993 with its refrigeration unit mounted on the roof within a sound- proofed enclosure. The measurement data at 30 feet from the rear of the store were as follows: 11 __/1)1/ 24-hour CNEL 65.3 dB Peak Hour Leq 73.5 dB Noisiest Hour 9-10 AM I-Second Max. 101.0 Time of Max. 10-11 AM If the above readings at 30 feet from the loading ramp are adjusted for the 40 foot setback proposed for the Chula vista store, the 24- hour CNEL is 62.8 dB. These measurements show that even with the ramp/deck and other loading and unloading facilities along the rear of the store, a 40-foot setback would be adequate to meet the City of Chula vista noise standard. The margin of safety is adequate to allow for day-to-day variation and still meet the standard. Unfortunately, meeting the standard is no guarantee that a noise nuisance will not exist. Peak noise hours in the 9-11 AM time period had maxima in the mid-70 dB range with impulses of 90-100 dB. Even with typical structural attenuation of 15 dB, the interior of homes adjacent to the project site would still have average readings in the 60 dB range and peaks into the 80's. While the 24-hour CNEL may be within acceptable standards, residents exposed to these noise levels would still find site activities intrusive. To reduce noise intrusion potential, the proposed project site incorporates several additional noise minimization features. In the latest site plan, the grocery receiving facility has been relocated to the north side of the building with the well opening further facing eastward to minimize westward noise propagation. A 6-foot landscaped block wall is also proposed for the western site boundary that will provide an additional 6-8 dB of noise reduction for off-site ground floor receivers west of the grocery store. Several additional time constraints on noise-generating activities are proposed as conditions on any required use permit to further insure noise compatibility with adjacent residents. The overall conclusion is that a new facility~ould meet the City's noise standard at the nearest residences as initially configured as long as all mechanical equipment was roof-mounted and sound- protected. Relocation of the receiving/loading dock and addition of a 6-foot landscaped masonry wall increases the margin of safety to not only meet the standard, but also reduce the nuisance potential from individual noise events (especially within the 9-11 AM peak noise period). A few additional measures are proposed under operational activity noise mitigation. 12 _IV; ~ NOISE IMPACT MITIGATION Traffic noise impacts the Lucky store relocation represent only a minor increase in existing exposure. Noise changes along site .~ access roadways do not create an unacceptable exposure, but only increase noise levels by an incrementally small and generally imperceptible amount. No noise impact mitigation is indicated as being required. Operational noise impacts from project implementation are incorporated into project design by maximizing the distance separation between residences and receiving/loading facilities, including orientation of the loading dock well opening facing away from residences. A landscaped 6-foot block wall along the western site boundary is included for additional noise protection. Additional operational measures recommended to condition the project include: 1. No delivery truck traffic shall occur in the alley between the rear of the store and the nearest homes from 10 PM to 7 AM. 2. No truck/trailers shall be mechanical equipment such running during the time from parked in the alley with any as refrigerator/freezer units 10 PM - 7 AM. 3. The trash compactor shall not be operated between the hours from 10 PM - 7 AM, Monday through Friday, 10 PM - 8 AM on Saturdays, and 10 PM - 9 AM on Sundays and holidays. 4. Refuse or recycled cardboard trucks shall not collect waste materials during those times when operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited. Short-term construction noise intrusion should be limited by conditions on construction permits to weekday hours with least noise sensitivity recommended to be from 7 AM to 5 PM except in an emergency. Those same permits should also specify construction access routing to minimize construction truck traffic past any existing residential or other noise sensitive uses in the vicinity of the site. The sound wall recommended to mitigate operational activity noise potential should be one of the first site improvements constructed to also assist in screening site construction noise impacts. The western perimeter wall and the construction time limits on operation of motorized equipment will maintain temporary construction noise impacts at less than significant levels. 13 __ I 0 ;}-. -- jhk & associates August 20. 1993 Mr. Jeff Guth American Stores Propenies Inc. Lucky Store 6569 Knott Avenue Buena Park. California 90620-1158 RE: Final Technical Repon - Lucky Grocery Store Project (JHK 20123) Dear Mr. Guth: JHK & Associates (JHK) is pleased to submit this Final Technical Repon for the Lucky Grocery Store project. This repon details the existing conditions in the immediate area of the project site at J Street/Third A venue in Central Chula Vista and documents the forecasted circulation system operating conditions for Year 1995 under the existing land uses and the proposed project. This Final Technical Repon contains a critical review of the proposed project site plan and also incorporates revisions based on city review comments detailed in our memorandum dated February 5. 1993. It has been a pleasure working with American Stores Propenies and FORMA on this project. If you have any questions regarding methodologies. assumptions. or findings of this study. please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely. lliK & Associates ]Jlhd~;fI~ Daniel F. Marum Senior Transportation Planner cc: Leslie Freeman. FORMA Barbara Reid. City of Chula Vista DFM/sl!: :Z0123b1-I~J ~ I v3- 8989 Rio San Diego Drive . Suite 335 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT LUCKY GROCERY STORE TRAFFIC IMP ACT ANALYSIS Prenared for: American Stores Properties Inc. Preoared hv: JHK & Associates 8989 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 335 San Diego, CA 92108 January 15, 1993 Revised: August 20, 1993 . 10'/ - ---, '( TABLE OF CONTENTS fw 1. INTRODUCTION 1-1 Background 1-1 Repon Organization 1-1 2. CIRCULATION 2.1 Methodologies and Threshold Standards 2-1 Existing Conditions Analysis 2-4 Future Conditions 2-7 Future Conditions Analysis - Future Year 1995 Conditions 2-10 3. PROJECT SITE PLAN REVIEW 3-1 4. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Existing Circulation Conditions 4-1 Future Year 1995 Conditions 4-1 APPENDIX A - HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX B - HCM SIGNALIZED ITNERSECTlON ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR WITH PROPOSED PROJECT APPENDIX C - TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT CONDUCTED IN AUGUST 1993 _ /OS"- Fipllre 1-1 1-2 2-1 2-2 LIST OF FIGURES Project Site Locations Proposed Project Site Plan Project Trip Distribution Daily and PM Peak Hour Year 1995 Project Generated Traffic Assignment (Cumulative) Daily and PM Peak Hour - Year 1995 Eiw: 1-2 1-3 2-11 2-12 olo~ - ( LIST OF TABLES Iahk fw 2-1 Chula Vista Summary of ~oadway Capacity and Level of Service 2-2 Threshol:i Standards Average Daily Traffic Volumes 2-2 Arterial Levels of Service 2-3 2-3 Level of Service for Signalized Intersections HCM Method 2-4 2-4 Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Level of Service Existing 2-5 Year 1992 Conditions 2-5 Arterial Segment Levels of Service Existing Year 1992 Conditions 2-5 2-6 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Existing Year 1992 Conditions 2-6 2-7 Estimated Daily and Peak Hour Trip Generation 2-9 2-8 Average Daily Traffic Volumes and Future Year 1995 Conditions 2-14 Levels of Service 2-9 PM Peak Hour Intersection Operations Future Year 1995 Conditions 2-15 I D ') ~ ~ I 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this repon is to document the assumptions, methodologies, and findings of the Lucky Grocery Store Traffic Impact Analysis Project. The primary focus of this repon is to document existing and future ttaffic conditions in the immediate study area adjacent to the project site and to provide a thorough review of the proposed project site plan. The remainder of this chapter provides a description of the proposed project and a summary of the traffic engineering topics covered in this report. BACKGROUND American Stores Propenies, Inc., the project developer, is proposing the construction of a 50,000 square foot grocery store and 12,900 square feet of associated retail commercial space on a 5.8 acre site located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection at J Street/Third A venue in Central Chula Vista. A total of 315 parking spaces will be constructed on the project site to serve the grocery store and the other retail commercial uses. The project site location is shown in Figure I-I, and the proposed project site plan is shown in Figure 1-2. The project site is currently occupied by a church and a pre-school facility. Church services typically accommodate 400 people, and approximately 125 children attend the pre- school facility on a regular basis. Currently, these is an existing Lucky Grocery Store located on the nonhwest quadrant of the J Streetffhird Avenue intersection. The project proponent envisions the relocation of this grocery store to the project site, while the existing building will' be occupied by other retail commercial uses. REPORT ORGANIZATION This repon consists of three major sections. The fIrSt pan details the existing and future circulation conditions in the project study area, and the second pan provides a thorough ttaffic engineering review of the proposed project site plan configuration. The final section summarizes the necessary circulation and project site design mitigation measures that will be required for implementation of the proposed project. The circulation analysis focuses on the existing and future roadway segment operations in the immediate area of the project site and intersection operations at the primary study area intersection of J Street/Third Avenue. Existing peak hour traffic volumes were obtained from the City of Chula Vista Engineering Depanment. As the proposed project is expected to be implemented in the near future, the analysis assumed that the proposed project would be open and fully operational by the Year 1995. With consideration for "passerby trips," the ponion of vehicles that visit the project site but would already be on the adjacent roadway network, project 1-1 - I (Je ~ J ~z ..."0'1 'OIOOU" ~ \I> "- ~\~ -J. ,.) ~w 0= ~e XCI) w ~ .... 1-2 -/Oy--- CI) ~ g CI) CI) 0( of ~ :J: ... "" ... cz ..:. "'"'0 t ti~ &, ""u to:.~g c:. .. U)o. !." O::J ..... A.CI) GI" ...U OD "0. <<;'e ...- >GlU ~U- 00= ::)"'D ..dH: ~ THIF.D srF.EET , ~ ...... ) ~ W " I- 0) ") ! "r:1 , ~\ ~ I 110'-0' I u ~ I I' " " " ,\ """ ..:v QJ.lJlillD H I ,'/ .. ---.-, I .- . I I ., - .. t. St ~ . ~ ih iI ".e ~;.. I iU en ~ ~ .., ~ :c .., z ~ E Vol ::: t i a 10: r c:.. toil Vol ~ o c:.: Ao III U ~ ~ - u> .!.'tJ 0:;, ..- A.CI) !'U 00 -a. ! > i~ iIi :.I: u- ~ 00= 0=..0 (,/) ...." ~ 1-3 -1/ [) - trip generation is estimated. The cumulative trip generation from the existing land uses on the project site are compared to that of the proposed projecL Project site contribution to daily and peak hour traffic volumes is detailed, and analysis of impacts is provided. Additionally. a safety review of the intersections of J Street/fhird Avenue adjacent to the project site was conducted. This review involved the analysis of the accident history at this intersection over a three year period (1989-1992). The second part of this repon details the detailed project site design It:view conducted for this analysis. This section details the adequacy of the number and location of the proposed project site access points. Also, given the close proximity of the Post Office. located to the south of the project site and the shon distance from the J Street/Third Avenue intersection to the proposed project access driveways, special attention is given to the storage capacity provided for vehicles attempting to turn into the project site via Third Avenue. A detailed review of internal circulation. and an identification of conflict points with passenger vehicles, delivery trucks, and pedestrians are provided. The issue of truck access, minimum turning radius, and circulation is also described. A review of the adequacy of the planned parking supply. design, and passenger vehicle circulation is included in this section. Special consideration is given to pedestrian safety, flow and potential conflict points in this repon. Recommendations for revisions to the proposed project site plan are detailed in this chapter. This repon concludes with a summary of the major fmdings and recommendations developed for this traffic impact analysis project. 1-4 - 111- 2. CIRCULATION INTRODUCTION This chapter details the assumptions, methodologies and findings of the transportation impact analysis conducted for the Lucky Grocery Store projecL The existing conditions of roadway segments immediately adjacent to .the project site and at the study area intersection of J StreetfI'hird A venue are defmed. Future conditions are also detailed, including estimates l)f daily and PM peak hour trip generation for the existing and planned land uses under the proposed project scenario. Driveway and passerby trips are estimated and the total new trips are distributed onto the study area circulation network. The resulting circulation system conditions are then assessed. The following data sources were used to define existing traffic volumes in the vicinity of the project site: . City of Chula Vista Engineering Department, Traffic Flow Report, December 18, 1991. . City of Chula Vista Engineering Department, 1992 Traffic Monhorin!! Prol!Tam, Arterial Se!!ment Level of Service ReDort. . City of Chula Vista Engineering Department, PM peak hour turning movement counts taken on October 27. 1992. METHODOLOGIES AND THRESHOLD STANDARDS In order to assess the existing and future daily segment levels of service. JHK utilized the methodologies and threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. Segment operating conditions are defined using the City's Roadway Capacity and Level of Service Standards for average daily traffic volumes (ADT). The maximum desired ADT levels for Level of Service (LOS) C conditions are shown in Table 2-1. The basis for the development of this table was the Chula Vista General Plan Circulation Element (June 1989). Additional sources which provide further traffic engineering criteria used in the development of this table included the City of Chula Vista Street Design Standards (July 1988) and San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) regional modeling input parameters and guidelines. The values shown on Table 2-1 are not an exact description of the actual operating level of service. The actual functional capacity of roadway facilities are based on the ability of arterial intersections to achieve acceptable levels of service. High quality intersection design could result in higher segment capacity and thus, higher volumes may occur on arterial segments than those shown on Table 2-1 while maintaining adequate perfonnance levels. Therefore. for arterial segments capacity analyses under existing and future (near-tenn) analyses. it is recommended that al1 study area 2-1 - / I:J..- - - Table 2-1 CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUMMARY OF ROADWAY CAPACITY AND LEVEL OF SERVICE THRESHOLD STANDARDS AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Roadway Classification Maximum Desirable ADT Volume LOS C. Anerial Faci1irie~ Expressway (6-Lane) Prime Anerial (6-Lane) Major Street (6-Lane) Major Street (4-Lane) Class I Collector (4- Lane) Class IT Collector (3-Lane) Class ill Collector (2-Lane) 70,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 22,000 12,000 7,500 Notes: 1. The volumes shown are intended as planning guidelines to determine the functional classification of roadways under investigation. The values are not an exact description of the anticipated operating level of service. The actual functional capacity of roadway facilities is based on the ability of arterial intersections to accommodate peak hour volumes. Special designs of intersections to achieve acceptable levels of service could result in higher capacities than those shown above. 2. Level of service standards for two-lane collectors (Qass IT and ill Collectors) and local streets are not typically evaluated at the General Plan level. Source: City of Chula Vista Design Standards Policy, December 1988. _ 113- 2-2 segments be reviewed to detennine if the segment operates under or over the recommended LOS threshold (LOS C). This planning tool does, however, provide a guideline which indicates where further analysis is required, while peak hour intersection level of service provides the primary source of information on which actual circulation system performance is based under existing and near-term future timeframes. As a further check of roadway segment operations, JHK obtained information contained in the 1992 Traffic Monitorinl! Prol!ram Arterial Sevment Levels of Service study prepared by the City of Chula Vista Engineering DepanmenL This study utilized the "Urban and Suburban Arterials" methodology outlined in the 1985 Hiv:hway Capacity Manual (HCM), Chapter II. This methodology defines level of service, average travel speed, and travel time by direction of travel. The City of Chula Vista has adopted a threshold standard of LOS C as measured by observed travel speeds on all signalized arterial segments, except during peak hours, when LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. The following table shows the level of service values for arterial segments by average travel speed. Table 2.2 ARTERIAL LEVELS OF SERVICE Level of Service Average Travel Speed (MPH) Class I Oass 2 Class 3 A B C D E F ~35 ~28 ~22 ~17 ~13 <13 ~30 ~24 ~18 ~14 ~IO <10 ~25 ~19 ~13 ~9 ~7 <7 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report 209, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985. This report contains existing travel time data for informational purposes under existing conditions only. For the analysis of project impacts it is recommended that peak hour intersection operations be reviewed in detail as described below. Signalized intersection operating conditions during the PM peak hour are assessed using the "Operational Method" outlined in Chapter 9 of the HCM for signalized intersections. The HCM methodology defines level of service as a function of vehicle "Stopped Time Delay." Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. The level of service criteria for signalized intersections is shown in Table 2-3. LOS A through C are considered acceptable in all conditions, and LOS D is also considered acceptable in densely 2-3 -IIi - developed urban study areas, such as the Lucky Grocery Store project area. Level of Service E and F are considered unacceptable, and, if possible, mitigation measures should be implemented to allow LOS A through D conditions to prevail under future conditions. By achieving LOS A-D at all study area intersections under future conditions with the proposed project, all City threshold standards related to performance standards for the circulation system will be met. Table 2.3 LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS HCM METHOD A B C D E F Average Delay (Seconds per Vehicle) <=5.0 5.1 - 15.0 15.1 - 25.0 25.1- 40.0 40.1 - 60.0 60.1 or more Level of Service Source: HCM Chapter 9, "Signalized Intersections." Note: For all capacity calculations IRK has assumed 0 volume for right turn on red. EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS This section defines the current circulation network operating conditions on roadway segments immediately adjacent to the project site and at the intersection of J Street/Third Avenue. The purpose of the existing conditions analysis is to document existing segment and intersection levels of service and to provide a baseline for determining project impacts. Roadu'av Sevment Onerntions Because of the limited area of impact expected from implementation of the proposed project, the roadway segment operating analysis is confined to J Street between Fourth and Second Avenues, and Third Avenue between I and K Streets. The roadway segments are all classified as Class I and II Collector facilities. Table 2-4 summarizes the existing ADT, LOS C capacities. and relationship to the adopted threshold standards of these four roadway segments. As shown in this table, the segments in question currently experience traffic volumes below the LOS C threshold. The following section details the existing average travel speed on roadway segments in the project vicinity and the associated levels of service. 2-4 / / --\- Table 2-4 AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND LEVEL OF SERVICE EXISTING YEAR 1992/1993 CONDITIONS . Relationship to Roadway Segment LOS Capacity * ADT Threshold Standards 1 Street (Class n Collector) Founh Avenue - Third Avenue 12,000 11,220 Under Third Avenue - Second Avenue 12,000 7,640 Under Third Avenue (Class I Collector) I Street - 1 Street 22,000 21,630 Under 1 Street - K Street 22,000 24,300 Under * Currently, the City of Chula Vista plans for LOS C conditions as a maximum design volume on aU Circulation Element facilities. Source: Existing Year 1992 ADT data was derived from Chula Vista traffic counts (Traffic Flow Repon, 1993). Using the HCM "Urban and Suburban Arterials" method for determining aneriallevel of service as a function of average travel speed, the City's Anerial Segment Levels of Service study included all but one of the study area roadway segments (the segment of 1 Street between Third Avenue and Second Avenue was not included in this study), and an excerpt from this study is shown on Table 2-5. As shown on this table, all study area roadway segments included in the analysis currently operate at LOS B, above the ":Iinimum threshold standard of LOS C for acceptable operations. Table 2-5 ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE EXISTING YEAR 1992 CONDITIONS Direction of Average Speed Average Travel Roadway Segment Travel (MPH) Time (Min:Sec) LOS Third Avenue (Class m) H Street - Naples Street NB 22.0 4:05.3 B SB 20.5 4:24.3 B 1 Street (Class nn 3:03.6 B 1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave. EB 22.0 WB 22.0 3:04.6 B Source: City of Chula Vista 1992 Traffic Monitoring Program. 2-5 _1110- Although the average travel speed on I Street east of Third Street was not included in this study, given that the average daily traffic volumes on I Street range from 11,370 west of Third Avenue to 7,640 east of Third Avenue, it can be assumed that acceptable ancriallevels of service prevail. The discussion of roadway segment level of service presented above is useful as a planning tool to indicate where funher analysis is required. However, peak hour intersection level of service provides the primary source of information on which actual circulation system performance is based under Existing Conditions. PM Peak Hour Intersection Ooerations To analyze existing Year 1992 intersection operating conditions, PM peak hour turning movements volumes at the intersection of J Street/fhird Avenue were obtained from the City. Due to the proposed land uses (retail commercial), it was determined that the PM peak hour was critical, since only a minimal amount of commercial traffic is expected during the morning peak period (7:00 AM - 9:00 AM). Analyzing the peak hour is imponant because this generally places the highest demand on the surrounding street system. Level of Service for the PM peak hour was calculated using the "Operational Method" for determining average vehicle stopped time delay as detailed previously in this chapter. The results of this analysis are shown below: Table 2.6 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS EXISTING YEAR 1992 CONDITIONS Approach Approach Delay (see) Approach LOS EB 14.8 B WB 7.8 B NB 9.3 B SB 12.6 B 11.5 B Intersection J Street/fhird Avenue Overall Intersection Operations Source: lliK & Associates Note: The peak hour factor (PHF) for the eastbound approach is .91 and for the westbound approach is .98. As shown, the intersection currently experiences a PM peak hour level of service B on each approach, with an overall intersection stopped time delay of 11.5 seconds per vehicle, well within the LOS D threshold standard adopted by the City. The detailed HCM worksheets used in this analysis are contained in Appendix A of this document. 2-6 _1/'7- Accidents The following accident data was provided to JHK by the City of Chula Vista Engineering Department regarding the intersection of J Street/Third Avenue for the period of January 1. 1989 to October 10,1992. Number of Collision Types Accidents Percent Head On 2 10.5 Rear End 3 15.8 Broadside 11 57.9 Hit Object 1 5.3 AutolPedestrian 2 10.5 Total Accidents 19 100.0 The City has indicated that the occurrence of 19 accidents over a thirty four month period is not atypical for an urban intersection such as J Street/Third Avenue. However. the characteristics of these accidents indicate that the intersection may warrant traffic signal improvements to provide left turn phasing. In addition, field observations indicate restrictions to Northboundl Southbound left turn movements due to higher opposing traffic volumes and lack of adequate gaps during peak periods. Thus. the City of Chula Vista should consider the provision of left turn phasing to improve traffic operations at this intersection. Summ3rv .. Exidinp Conditions This section has documented the existing roadway segment conditions in terms of level of service by average daily traffic volumes and average travel speed. Also PM peak hour intersection operations were defined in terms of average vehicle stopped time delay. In each instance. the calculated level of service for study area roadway segments and intersections were found to operate in conformance with the adopted threshold standards. From an operational standpoint, no roadway segment or intersection improvements are required at this time to accommodate existing travel demand. The accident data compiled along with field observations at the intersection of J Street/Third A venue indicates that the intersection may warrant traffic signal improvements to provide left turn phasing. The City of Chula Vista should consider the provision of this phasing to improve traffic operations at this intersection. The remainder of this chapter presents the future operating conditions that can be expected with or without the implementation of the proposed project 2-7 _)/t~ FUTURE CONDITIONS This chapter defines the expected driveway and cumulative trip generation from the existing land uses and the proposed project. Also, an estimate of future growth in traffic is estimated. Project trips are distributed onto the adjacent roadway network and the resulting circulation system operations are summarized. Pa"~erhv Trin Contribution As mentioned previously in this document, the issue of passerby trip contribution is critical to the understanding of the actual impacts the proposed project will have on study area roadway segments and the primary study area intersection (J Street/I'hird A venue). The traffic which will result from the implementation of the proposed project is estimated using standard trip generation rates and peak hour factors for each category of land use. These rates have been developed by various agencies and summarized by SANDAG in their Traffic Generators manual. According to SANDAG, the proposed 50,000 square foot grocery store will generate a total of 150 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The associated 12,000 square feet of retail commercial space to be located on the site is expected to generate 40 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Some of the trips generated by the project will already be on the street system and linked with other trips. This type of driver behavior is known as "passerby trips". The City of San Diego has completed research on passerby trips through detailed surveys at similar sites in the City of San Diego. Passerby trips refer to a driver stopping at a commercial establishment during the conduct of another trip, then continuing on the original trip. Therefore" the vehicle is already on the adjacent street system and should not be "double counted" by the gross traffic generation rate. The recommended cumulative or linked trip rate for a grocery store and retail commercial spaces is 40 trips per 1,000 square feet of GF A. Thus, based on the City of San Diego passerby study, approximately 74 percent of the total number of vehicles are assumed to already be in the traffic stream. This trip reduction was confirmed with the City Traffic Engineer (Mr. Harold Rosenberg, November 10,1992). Trio (;e-nera.ionlDistrihufion Using the standard SANDAG trip generation rates and the cumulative trip generation rates developed by the City of San Diego, Table 2-7 summarizes the estimated daily and PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the project site under the existing land uses (church and pre-school) and under the proposed project (grocery store and commercial shops). As shown on this table, although the total daily trips generated by the site under the proposed project land use scenario is almost ten times more than the daily trip under the existing land uses, when the passerby trips are removed (to avoid double counting for vehicles already in the traffic stream 2-8 _111- ->> u'" 0", .c'- .. C~ -'" - \0 1 fO') 0 9 a ...>> is ::I - ~ oc !su 00; :c 0 ... .....:: ca "oS 0 i-o 'D U s-s .cc Cc .., 11"\ 1 ... 0 9 a ~ '" S'- :3 Ii: - ~ oc .c ... ... "'0 .!!~ a. >>'D ~.!! e-::I ~I U ::I .;; ~ - ~'e ca - 9 ; ~ ; :g ~ '" -5... ... - N 50; -5!! ._ ::I :z: ...E ~~ " ~!! !iu 0 ~-- c ... ;t!. '<t ~ CI'I ~ ~ \CI u.- ~:! ~ ca oc 8 ... .= u :; '" '" "l. "'- ...~ ... N -'- CII: S'C N ~~ ... ~ ::II- .,..,0 10:' :z: u e... l'U;' ~ Q.O u'B- e u'" ~ .c'- -=~ e: >>~ '<t 9 CI'I 8 1 \CI -'" :; rI) oc g ... .c.2:- 0... CII: '" 11"\ = bO'" -u ... ...: otO ::IC 'B:! I- Q'i: e '" CII: I- -0 '" . .cU -0 Q. '" ;:1 --5 =ClJg 0 :!c ,8 =.- c- :c "'.- :s!'s ~ .::: .::: Q.-o t;' ~ .::: -ou ~ 1:1. i' - '" ::I...~ N < 'i: i' :s! i' == OQ. II ~ I-:! !~ ~'c.5 - :is :c ~ ---0 a. >>'" 8 ~ "'>> N ~ :!: =CII: ..!:!. "'", oS= a 'N ca - 11"\ - -5!! ~- ~ ~ - ","'''' a. Q ~ u-o - C'\~ Q - 11"\ ... = c:; II Ii: - .!!bO ... bO :z: .S:! t:: .- S i='= < .cu -5 a. bO ",< u... ~'5 ~ ::I"': >- ~ " a~ ..:I 'S~ ou>> .::: c .::: .::: > '" ....c ... II !! ....- ~ .", < ... "'- i' i' i' ,8.-; ,8;;-0 o;~ Q ;:1';;; :s! e.~ e"E '" = Q 'I:I~ ~ :c ~ ~ =ee cc "'0 ~ Ii:_ ... =- c=_ ~'D ~.s 11"\ c~ u...c N N ~ N '3u -5 r8 ~~ < '" - - OC 1uca ~ -... ov et3 uo tj -5>> B\. c ~.~ ~ >> o;-E "'~o .c31- - 's[:I B ::IU if:! "'...0 '" u ~ !h:: tIoO e ...'" > Q. .!!! 'e!.!! ._~ Q.Q. 'D~ e ~ ~ [.g c ... 'S ~ i- '" .- gl-o f >> .- "E 8. ii :!o a E~ ,t8. - >>> e e.,.., <<(I) I (I) 'ii! u'D a .Q. ~ ~f;2'S '1:1 ie '-"Ii: 1 0-5~ Ii: (1)0 8~ ~<~ ~ (I) '-" bO i=' N =:(I)U .cc .c:= ... ~:S2 ....c u .5 (I)'" ~ ::s._ !E i1 - Cc6 8 '" 0 ;.; ~ ~ c B 0 . Z (I) ... --- I d-1 2-9 adjacent to the project site), the net increase in daily traffic volume is 1,507 vehicles daily and 62 vehicles in the PM peak hour. It is important to understand that for the analysis of roadway segments and intersections adjacent to the project site, the cumulative daily and peak hour trips are added to future traffic volumes. For the analysis of internal circulation and driveway operations, the total daily trips (cumulative plus passerby trips) are used. The distribution of trips generally results from an estimation of ultimate travel destinations and the determination of which elements of the street system would be used to reach those destinations. The basis for this recognition is the driver's consideration of time, distance and convenience, in choosing a route. Trip distribution for this project was based on JHK's knowledge of traffic pattems in the Chula Vista area and previous experience with other similar projects. Figure 2-1 shows the distribution of project traffic onto the adjacent roadway network. As shown on this figure, it is assumed that the majority of the trips associated with the project would access the site via Third A venue (seventy percent) and over half of these trips would orient to and from the north on Third Avenue. Thirty percent of the project trips would access the site via J Street, evenly split between east and west. Figure 2-2 shows the assignment of the cumulative daily and peak hour trips generated by the proposed Lucky Grocery Store project. These trips will be added to the projected traffic volumes for Year 1995. The following section details the methodology and findings of the future Year 1995 conditions analysis of the "No Project" Alternative, which assumes the existing land uses on the site will remain unchanged, and the projected impacts of implementing the proposed project. FUTURE CONDITIONS ANALYSIS. YEAR 1995 The following assumptions were used in the projection of future Year 1995 traffic volumes on the study area circulation network: . First, since the existing Lucky Grocery Store building, currently located on the northwest quadrant of the J Street/Third Avenue intersection, is expected to remain and be converted into other retail uses, no reduction in trip generation from the site has been assumed. . Second, a standard annual growth rate of two percent has been applied to existing daily and PM peak hour traffic volumes to simulate expected increases in traffic due to other development projects in the City of Chula Vista. The resulting volumes were used to define Year 1995 "No Project" conditions. . Third, as stated in the previous section, only cumulative trips associated with the project (total trips minus passerby trips) have added to the Year 1995 Base Condition volumes. 2-10 - I?-!- II) ~ - ~ ! g ~ ... elf ~ ::E: at ... It) . - ! Third Avenue ~ ~ !~ II ~ >> :z ~~ == ...~ - ~<. N VJ~ ...;.- t Q::!:I:II: 6\, e::;.< to: I:II:QI;:I ~:z> ti< ~~ 0< I:II:Q ;. ~ ~ AI( >> ~\ 'C )I ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - ~ - ~ I ~ g ~i .. u>- !.'tJ O:J .... A.C/) ... ..u OC "0. c:.e ..- >Glu ~u- 00= ~..c ....,,~ -/,;2.:J..- en I ~ 0 IS. ~ ~jE en J:~ <( ~ Gi a IllS !!! z i~ ~ - ... ... :z:: en .... ~ 0 .... <( ... . . -' ::: ;- .... ~ ... ,-. I.:i > S 5 ~'" ug: -- E-= z< I.:il.:i :::11;.- Z' t.:I= -~ iI N tl:>O . tI:>= N <:;:: - -,.... .. u< 8~ .. i!?~ = E~ .., ...... '( )r io: <I:. ~ Third Avenue 11( .. f!!~ ~I ee ~z 'E-< ::::: ~~ ... ... ~- M ~~ t.:I E- U I.:i ... 0 = I:. - 0>- .!-c pI o :J ..- Q ~ A.,CI) ... GI- ... M .. 0 ~~ o C -0. 2'" Cl)e Q. >-- .. >Glo ~o;;:: 00-- ..c 3~.: /;)3_ ~ .~ . Finally, the same geometric and signal phasing assumption used in the Existing Conditions Analysis are used in the following analysis offuture Year 1995 segment and intersection operation. Sepment Canndfv Ana'v~i~. Future Year 1995 C..nndition~ Table 2-8 summarizes the forecasted ADT ttaffic volumes under the "No Project" and "Proposed Project" land use scenarios. As shown on this table, with the assumed .mnual growth rate of two percent, projected ADTs on J Street and Third Avenue are expected to exceed the LOS C operating threshold under each land use scenario, with or without the proposed project. Under the proposed project land use scenario, the project contributes two to three percent to the total daily traffic volumes on these impacted segments. As mentioned previously, the analysis of segment performance and impacts is only provided for review purposes. To precisely define circulation system impacts under Future Year 1995 conditions, the following analysis of PM peak hour intersection operation is provided. 'nfer~ecfion Canacitv Analvsis . Future Year 1995 Conditions Table 2-9 summarizes the forecasted PM peak hour intersection operating conditions under the "No Project" and the "Proposed Project" land use scenarios. As shown on this table, even with the two percent annual growth in traffic, the intersection of J Street/Third A venue is expected to maintain LOS B under each land use scenario, with or without the proposed projecL Under the proposed project land use scenario, the project contributes four percent to the total PM peak hour entering volumes at this intersection. Appendix B of this document contains the detailed HCM worksheets used in this analysis. 2-13 -/~~- = <:) - .... ....- I:~= = ~'Q'= ~ ~ ~ ~ E 6.1&"= N ~ ~ N .!! Q.,Q.,= III <:) = U <:) .i - ~ ::I .1:: c:a."O '" U ._='= ~ .. .. .. - ~.c:; U ";;j "0 U U I:fj"O 0 e o 0 .. e I: :> .E -- ~ = -.c_ ~ "'I-V) 'ii 101 = ::I U '0 ... > > E * 0 N - r-- Q Q= Q., * N '" ..... 0- 'w Z~ I- ..... ..... '" - . M 00 ..;- ..;- U ~ Q "0 <", < - N N e !'! V)O ::I i 101 V) e :;~ <:) O;c ~1oJ I- '" ~ ~> c:a.'= '" e 0101 ._'Q"= .. '" - .. .. ~ 1 >~ .c.c; U U U '" ~~"CS 0 "0 00 '" uV) ~ eUe e '" oc _z a: .- .. = :> e , 1::52 . _.c_ .!: N E .!I-V) - ! .. <I- .. :a :c =- Q., = = ~ I-Q e <:) ";;j z y ::I >z = * '" 00 "It 0- U e ~o * '" 0 on 00 CI) i _u I- q. - 0- '" 9 a <'" Q N 00 M M QS:: < - N N 1 .. 101- oS c= '" ~ << i =101 ~~ ~~ 0. "0 101> "0 >101 ;! e N N N N !: <= - - N N :> ~ - tIS B ~ - ::I .~ ~ c '" i .... .- U <:) .0:: 8 ::I ~ g .; -. e .. ! ~ ~ .- J ~ e U 1! < .s .~ ... - ] "0 is g I ~. 1 < u F 1:1 O;::rJ = 0 - j;; ~ CI) - ! ...... ~ :! U , !! .- .::: ::I 8 ! CI) y ... =: tIS e ~ .:! III 0 ~ = ~ ~ ...... U * - < > < , I * * ~ < - - U .0:: 'E U U ;.; ~ 1:: ] !: !: ~ - ::I := ::I V) If F V)CI) <:) ~ I- - ... CI) _ I :J-S" ~ Table 2-9 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS FUTURE YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS "No Proiect" "Proposed Project" Cumulative Approacb Approacb Approacb Appl'Ollcb F.1Iject Trip Intersection Approacb Delay (sec) LOS Delav (sec) LOS Contribution 1 Streel/Third Avenue EB 17.3 C 17.8 C 3% WB 7.9 B 8.0 B S% NB 9.6 B 9.9 B S% SB 13.9 B IS.3 C 4% Overall Intersection Operations 12.6 B 13.4 B 4% Source: JHK & Associates. Summarv. Future Year 1995 Conditions The future conditions analysis described in the previous section revealed that the following roadway segments are expected to experience daily traffic volumes in excess of the LOS C threshold standards: . J Street between 4th Avenue and Third Avenue . Third Avenue between I Street and J Street . Third Avenue between J Street and K Street However, as stated previously, the PM peak hour intersection operations provide the primary source of information on which the assessment of actual circulation system performance is based. The PM peak hour intersection capacity analysis found the intersection to maintain level of service B both with and without the implementation of the proposed Lucky Grocery Store projecL Thus, from a circulation perspective, no significant impacts were found as a result of the project under Year 1995 conditions. As stated previously in this chapter, the existing accident data compiled for the intersection of 1 Street/I'hird Avenue along with field observations, indicates that the intersection may warrant traffic signal improvements to provide left turn phasing. However, the traffic generated from the proposed project site is not expected to significantly contribute to the amount of accidents expected to occur at this intersection. To improve the traffic operations at this intersection, the City of Chula Vista should consider the provision of left turn phasing. 2-15 -Id-~ - Annlvsis ofTmDncts - BuiJdout General Plan Condition~ The change in use from the existing church and day care center on the project site to the proposed rewl commercial shopping center will have an impact on the adopted General Plan for this portion of the City. Currently, the adopted General Plan land use assumptions designate this parcel as Professional Office! Administrative which is different than the intended commercial use. This change in land use will require a General Plan Amendment and rezoning of the area. From a ttansportation planning perspective, however, the main issue is that regardless of the type of use, will the total number of trips generated by the site remain approximately the same. If the gross number of project trips are the same under both land use scenarios, then it can be said that there will be no impact. Since the determination of how much professional office space is not governed by preset floor area ratio (FAR) requirements, the only limitation to the amount of development is the required onsite parking. The City of Chula Vista currently requires I space for every 200 square feet of GF A. Thus, approximately twenty percent more professional office space could be built on the project site than would be allowed if the site were to be used for rewl commercial shops. The SANDAG trip rate for office uses ranges from 20 daily trips per 1,000 square feet for a medical office. The cumulative trip rate for rewl shops has been estimated to be 40 daily trips per 1,000 square feet. Thus, with the range of possible uses under the General Plan land use designation and the opportunity to increase the amount of office space beyond that allowed for rewl commercial development (due to onsite paIking restraints) it is possible to conclude that no significant impacts to the adopted General Plan Circulation Element will be created as a result of the proposed General Plan Amendment and the associated rezoning of the project site. As requested by the City of Chula Vista, IRK conducted a worst case traffic analysis of potential trip generation for this site. Appendix C conwns a copy of this traffic analysis report conducted in August 1993. Concltl~ion Based on the analysis of future traffic conditions (Year 1995 and Buildout General Plan), it has been determined that no geometric improvements to the critical study intersection of ] StreetlThird Avenue will be required. Thus, the existing geometric configuration of this intersection will provide adequate capacity, and acceptable levels of service will result upon the implementation of this project. It is anticipated that the project will be required to contribute to the City of Chula Vista's Traffic Signal System Fee program along with other typical development fees established by the City. The following ,chapter dewls the project site design review conducted for this project 2-16 _/:J-1- . 3. PROJECT SITE PLAN REVIEW The proposed Lucky store site in Chula Vista was reviewed for site design requirements. The issues addressed include: . AdequacylIocation of proposed" site access points . Internal circulation . Truck access . Adequacy of parking supply . Parking design/circulation . Pedestrian safety JHK's comments of these issues follows: 1. The driveway on Third Avenue nearest J Street will pose conflicts with vehicles making V-turns on Third Avenue and is too close to the intersection. Driveways should be approximately 300' from the intersection. 2. The truck circulation within the project site provides adequate turning radii, but it poses a conflict point with shoppers entering and exiting the store in front 3. the number of parking spaces proposed (315) is just adequate when based on 1 space/200 sft. Removal of any spaces would produce an inadequate number of spaces. 4. Parking spaces are sometimes unusable because shopping carts are left in them' instead of being returned to the store or cart corrals. The addition of cart corrals near the middle of the parking rows would be beneficial. 5. The southern most entrance to the site (near the Moose Lodge) will have left turn vehicles waiting for adequate gaps in the north/south traffic along Third A venue. As these vehicles queue on-site. shoppers will not be able to back their cars out of their parking stalls. . In order to improve the circulation. design, and operation of the proposed Lucky site. JHK suggests the following recommendations: 1. Remove the northern most driveway along Third Avenue. 2. Reconfigure the parking aisle along the southern driveway to eliminate parking conflicts. . One solution for preventing conflicts with vehicles making V-turns on Third Avenue and vehicles accessing the project site would be to consolidate the two driveways on Third Avenue into one central driveway located at the center of the property frontage on Third Avenue. 3-1 ~/;)~~ However, the most efficient way of resolving site access issues is for the Project Proponent and the Project Architect to meet with the City Traffic Engineer directly to best address City concerns regarding access. 3-2 ~ Id7- 4. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS EXISTING CIRCULATION CONDITIONS The calculated level of service for study area roadway segments and intersections were found to be in conformance with the adopted threshold standards from an operation standpoint, no roadway segment or intersection improvements are required at this time to accommodate existing travel demand. As a condition of development the City of Chula Vista should require the dedication of additional right-of-way along the northern property line of the proposed site. This additional right-of-way will allow for the construction of a new exclusive right turn only lane for eastbound J Street traffic to proceed southbound on Third Avenue. . FUTURE YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS The future conditions analysis of roadway segment capacity revealed that Third Avenue between I Street and K Street and J Street between Fourth Avenue and Third Avenue would experience daily traffic volumes in excess of the LOS C threshold standards. However, since the PM peak hour intersection operations provide the primary source of information on which the assessment of actual circulation system performance is based. and the intersection of J StreetfThird Avenue was found to maintain LOS B both with and without the implementation of the proposed Lucky Grocery Store project, no significant impacts were found under Year 199~ conditions. The accident data compiled for the intersection of J StreetfThird A venue indicates that the intersection may warrant traffic signal improvements to provide left turn phasing to improve traffic operations at this intersection. It is anticipated that the project will be required to contribute to the City's Traffic Signal Fee program along with other development fees established by the City but no specific geometrics mitigation measures are required for this project. PROJECT SITE PLAN REVIEW In order to improve the circulation design. and operation of the proposed Lucky site. JHK suggests the removal of the northem most driveway along Third Avenue and the reconfiguration of the parking aisle along the southern driveway to eliminate parking conflicts. It is recommended that the Project Proponent consult with the City Traffic Engineer to develop the fmal site access plan for the site. . _130- 4-1 APPENDIX A HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS EXISTING YEAR 1992 CONDITIONS. PM PEAK HOUR _/3/- . 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *... *.................... * *.............. *. * * *** * * * * * *** * *** *.. *****. ...'. *... * ***.. *** *.-.. ***... * INTERSECTION.. J Street/Third Avenue AREA TYPE. . . . . OTHER ANALYST.......PAB D~rE..........12-01-1992 TIME..........PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Existing Year 1992 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 71 95 54 57 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 255 163 622 866 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 207 37 43 92 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PRG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 50 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 50 Y 22.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.91 50 Y 22.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X . TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.132 0.450 7.3 B 14.8 B TR 0.797 0.450 16.0 C WB L 0.306 0.450 8.2 B 7.8 B T 0.231 0.450 7.7 B R 0.079 0.450 7.2 B NB L 0.297 0.450 8.2 B 9.3 B TR 0.532 0.450 9.4 B SB L 0.189 0.450 7.6 B 12.6 B TR 0.788 0.450 12.8 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.5 (.ee/veh) V/C . 0.792 LOS . B _ ) 3 ~- . INTERSECTION GEOMETRY Page-2 ====================================================================== NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS: EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND = 3 NORTHBOUND = 3 SOUTHBOUND = 3 EB WB NB SB LANE TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 2 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 3 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 4 5 6 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE LT - LEFT/THROUGH LANE LR - LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE LTR - LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LANE TR - THROUGH/RIGHT LANE R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT LANE ====================================================================~= GRADE HEAVY VEH. ADJACENT PKG BUSES (%) (%) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHF ---------- EASTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 WESTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 NORTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 SOUTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.91 Nrn = number of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb = number of buses stopping/hr CONFLICTING PEDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON (peds/hour) (Y/N) (min T) ARRIVAL TYPE ---------------- ----------------- ------------ EASTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 WESTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 NORTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 SOUTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 min T = minimum green time for pedestrians IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 J Street Third Avenue 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour _133~ . . SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS P...ge-3 PRETIMED ac=========================....=====:===_=======_==_================== LOST TIME/PHASE.. 3.0 CYCLE LENGTH.. 60.0 EAST/WEST PHASING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EASTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS WESTBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS NORTHBOUND RT SOUTHBOUND RT PHASE-l X X X X PHASE-4 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 X X X X GREEN 26.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NORTH/SOUTH PHASING --------------------------------------------------------------------,- SOUTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS EASTBOUND RT WESTBOUND RT GREEN 26.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 NORTHBOUND LEFT THRU RIGHT PEDS . PHASE-l X X X X PHASE-2 PHASE-4 PHASE-3 X X X X 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Y....r 1992 . J Str..t Third Av.nu. 12-01-1992 ; PM P.ak Hour -,3<f- VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET P"ge-4 ====================================================================== LANE LANE ADJ. MVT. ADJ. LANE GRP. NO. UTIL. GROWTH GRP. PROP PROP VOL. PHF VOL. GRP. VOL. LN FAC't'. FACT. VOL. LT RT ------ EB LT 71 0.98 72 L 72 1 1. 000 1.000 72 1.00 0.00 TH 255 0.98 260 TR 471 1 1. 000 1. 000 471 0.00 0.45 RT 207 0.98 211 WB LT 95 0.88 108 L 108 1 1. 000 1. 000 108 1.00 0.00 TH 163 0.88 185 T 185 1 1. 000 1.000 185 0.00 0.00 RT 37 0.88 42 R 42 1 1. 000 1. 000 42 0.00 1.00 NB LT 54 0.93 58 L 58 1 1. 000 1.000 58 1.00 0.00 TH 622 0.93 669 TR 715 2 1. 050 1. 000 751 0.00 0.06 RT 43 0.93 46 SB LT 57 0.91 63 L 63 1 1. 000 1.000 63 1.00 0.00 TH 866 0.91 952 TR 1053 2 1. 050 1.000 1105 0.00 0.10 RT 92 0.91 101 . Denotes " Defacto Left Turn Lane Group IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 '" _/3 j, , - SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR Page-5 INPUT VARIABLES ============================================_=..c.===_==_.==-============= SB EB WB NB --------------------------------------------------------_._---------------- Cycle Length, C (sec) Effective Green, G (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, Plt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., Plto 60.0 27.0 1 544 471 72 1. 000 1 227 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 335 227 108 1.000 1 471 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 773 715 58 1. 000 2 1053 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 1115 1053 63 1. 000 2 715 0.000 COMPUTATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NB SB EB WB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop Gu=(G-C*Yo)/(l-Yo) Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5))) Gq=G-Gu Pt=l-Pl Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt**0.5Gq))/Pl El=1800/(1400-Vo) Fm=Gf/G+ (Gu/G) (11 (l+Pl (El-1))) + (2IG) (l+Pl) Flt=(Fm+N-l)IN IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 1800 0.126 22.231 0.733 1. 000 4.769 0.000 0.000 1.53 0.685 0.685 1800 0.262 15.290 0.580 1. 000 11. 710 0.000 0.000 1.94 0.440 0.440 3600 0.292 13.362 0.217 1. 000 13.638 0.000 0.000 5.18 0.244 0.244 3600 0.199 18.821 0.428 1. 000 8.179 0.000 0.000 2.63 0.413 0.413 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 _ ) 3,0 - SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-6 ======================================================================= IDEAL ADJ. SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT. FLOW LNS W HV G P SS A RT LT FLOW ES L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.685 1220 TR 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.800 1. 000 1. 000 0.922 1. 000 1315 WB L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 0.440 785 T 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1782 R 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.800 1.000 1.000 0.826 1. 000 1178 NB L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.244 434 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.989 1. 000 3136 SB L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 0.413 737 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.983 1. 000 3119 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 _)37- CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Page-7 =========:========..=...:=........:==...=:...................==-._.=== , ADJ. ADJ. SAT. FLOW LANE GROUP FLOW RATE FLOW RATE RATIO GREEN RATIO CAPACJTY vlc (v) (s) (vis) (g/C) (c:) RATIO --------- --------- ----------- ---------- EB L 72 1220 0.059 0.450 549 0.132 TR 471 1315 0.359 0.450 592 0.797 * WB L 108 785 0.138 0.450 353 0.306 T 185 1782 0.104 0.450 802 0.231 R 42 1178 0.036 0.450 530 0.079 NB L 58 434 0.134 0.450 195 0.297 TR 751 3136 0.239 0.450 1411 0.532 SB L 63 737 0.085 0.450 332 0.189 TR 1105 3119 0.354 0.450 1404 0.788 * Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (vis) critical = 0.713 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical .. 0.792 . IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET..... NAME OF THE NORTH I SOUTH STREET... DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 J Street Third Avenue 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour . _ /3t- LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8 ====================================================================== DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP. EB L 0.132 0.450 60.0 7.3 549 0.0 1.00 7.3 B 14.8 B TR 0.797 0.450 60.0 10.8 592 5.2 1.00 16.0 C WB L 0.306 0.450 60.0 8.0 353 0.2 1.00 8.2 B 7.8 B T 0.231 0.450 60.0 7.7 802 0.0 1.00 7.7 B R 0.079 0.450 60.0 7.2 530 0.0 1.00 7.2 B NB L 0.297 0.450 60.0 8.0 195 0.3 1.00 8.2 B 9.3 B TR 0.532 0.450 60.0 9.1 1411 0.3 1.00 9.4 B SB L 0.189 0.450 60.0 7.5 332 0.0 1.00 7.6 B 12.6 B TR 0.788 0.450 60.0 10.7 1404 2.2 1.00 12.8 B Intersection Delay = 11.5 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... OTHER INFORMATION: Existing Year 1992 J Street Third Avenue 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour _/31 ~ . APPENDIX B HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR PART I. "NO PROJECT" ALTERNATIVE PART n. "PROPOSED PROJECT" . . _ 11 i) - APPENDIX B-PARTI HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR "NO PROJECT" ALTERNATIVE -1'+ I - 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT *********......*****...****.....*****....*******...***.*....*****.*******. INTERSECTION.. J Street/Third Avenue AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALyST.......PAB DATE..........12-01-1992 TIME..........PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 75 99 57 60 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 271 173 660 919 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 39 46 96 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (') (') Y/N Nm NO Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 50 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 50 Y 22.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.91 50 Y 22.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X . PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.142 0.450 7.4 B 17.3 C TR 0.847 0.450 18.9 C WB L 0.340 0.450 8.4 B 7.9 B T 0.245 0.450 7.8 B . R 0.084 0.450 7.2 B NB L 0.348 0.450 8.7 B 9.6 B TR 0.565 0.450 9.7 B SB L 0.212 0.450 7.7 B 13.9 B TR 0.834 0.450 14.2 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay .. 12.6 (sec/veh) V/C .. 0.841 LOS .. B ~ 1'1- Z -- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *..*.....******....***..........*****......**..........*.*......*.*... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ========================================c====================:======== NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET........ J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...... Third Avenue AREA TYPE........................... OTHER NAME OF THE ANALyST................. PAB DATE OF THE ANALySIS................ 12-01-1992 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project TRAFFIC VOLUMES ====================================================================== EB WB NB SB LEFT 75 99 57 60 THRU 271 173 660 919 RIGHT 220 39 46 96 RTOR 0 0 0 0 (RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes. ) ~1t./3~ INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ===========================================Z_ZE======================= page-2 NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS: EASTBou-.m "' 2 WESTBOUND "' 3 NORTHBOUND "' 3 EB WB NB LANE TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 2 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 3 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 4 5 6 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE LT - LEFT/THROUGH LANE LR - LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE LTR - LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS SOUTHBOUND "' 3 SB TYPE WIDTH L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LANE TR - THROUGH/RIGHT LANE R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT LANE ====================================================================== GRADE HEAVY VEH. ADJACENT PKG BUSES (t) (t) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHF ---------- EASTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 WESTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 NORTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 SOUTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.91 Nm = number of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb "' number of buses stopping/hr CONFLICTING PEDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON (peds/hour) (Y/N) (min T) ARRIVAL TYPE ---------------- ----------------- ------------ EASTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 WESTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 NORTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 SOUTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 min T "' minimum green time for pedestrians IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; ~ Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project _1</'1- SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS PAge-3 =========================================z============================ PRETIMED LOST TIME/PHASE = 3.0 CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 EAST /WEST PHASING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 EASTBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X WESTBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X NORTHBOUND RT SOUTHBOUND RT GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NORTH/SOUTH PHASING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 NORTHBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X SOUTHBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X EASTBOUND RT WESTBOUND RT GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM PeAk Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future YeAr 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project ..- -/ Y ~ - VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-4 ..====.====:====..===......_......................==..========...===== LANE LANE ADJ. MVT. ADJ. ~ GRP. NO. UTIL. GROWTH GRP. PROP PROP VOL. PIIF VOL. GRP. VOL. LN FACT. FACT. VOL. LT RT ------ ---- EB LT 75 0.98 77 L 77 1 1.000 1. 000 77 1.00 0.00 TH 271 0.98 277 TR 501 1 1. 000 1. 000 501 0.00 0.45 RT 220 0.98 224 WB 0.00 LT 99 0.88 113 L 113 1 1. 000 1. 000 113 1.00 TH 173 0.88 197 T 197 1 1.000 1. 000 197 0.00 0.00 RT 39 0.88 44 R 44 1 1. 000 1. 000 44 0.00 1.00 NB LT 57 0.93 61 L 61 1 1. 000 1.000 61 1.00 0.00 TH 660 0.93 710 TR 759 2 1. 050 1.000 797 0.00 0.07 RT 46 0.93 49 SB LT 60 0.91 66 L 66 1 1. 000 1. 000 66 1.00 0.00 TH 919 0.91 1010 TR 1115 2 1.050 1. 000 1171 0.00 0.09 RT 96 0.91 105 * Denotes a Defacto Left Turn Lane Group IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 .w/2 percent growth and no project . . - 'Y- lei - SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR Page-5 ======================================================~================== INPUT VARIABLES EB WB NB SB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cycle Length, C (see) Effective Green, G (see) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, PIt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., PI to 60.0 27.0 1 578 501 77 1. 000 1 241 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 353 241 113 1. 000 1 501 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 820 759 61 1.000 2 1115 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 1181 1115 66 1. 000 2 759 0.000 COMPUTATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB EB WB NB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop Gu=(G-C.Yo)/(l-Yo) Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs.Gu+4.5))) Gq=G-Gu Pt=l-Pl Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt..0.5Gq))/Pl El=1800/(1400-Vo) Fm=Gf/G+ (Gu/G) (1/ (l+Pl (E1-1))) + (2IG) (l+Pl) Flt= (Fm+N-1) /N IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 1800 0.134 21. 901 0.724 1. 000 5.099 0.000 0.000 1.55 0.670 0.670 1800 0.278 14 .272 0.562 1.000 12.728 0.000 0.000 2.00 0.412 0.412 3600 0.310 12.186 0.178 1. 000 14.814 0.000 0.000 6.32 0.220 0.220 3600 0.211 18 . 182 0.401 1. 000 8.818 0.000 0.000 2.81 0.388 0.388 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; 'PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project -/'1-;- SATURATION FLOW ADJUS'lMENT WORKSHEET Page-6 -===========..=====--==-=======================-.-.-==================== IDEAL ADJ. SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT. FLOW LNS W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW EB L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.670 1195 TR 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1.000 0.800 1. 000 1. 000 0.922 1. 000 1315 WB L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.412 734 T 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1782 R 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.800 1. 000 1. 000 0.826 1. 000 1178 NB L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.220 391 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.989 1. 000 3136 SB L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.388 691 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1.000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.984 1. 000 3120 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project . _/yK- CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Page-7 -==========================================a=========__.============== ADJ. ADJ. SAT. FLOW LANE GROUP FLOW RATE FLOW RATE RATIO GREEN RATIO CAPACITY vlc (v) (s) (vIs) (gIC) (c) RATIO --------- --------- ----------- ---------- EB L 77 1195 0.064 0.450 538 0.142 TR 501 1315 0.381 0.450 592 0.847 * WB L 113 734 0.153 0.450 330 0.340 T 197 1782 0.110 0.450 802 0.245 R 44 1178 0.038 0.450 530 0.084 NB L 61 391 0.157 0.450 176 0.348 TR 797 3136 0.254 0.450 1411 0.565 SB L 66 691 0.095 0.450 311 0.212 TR 1171 3120 0.375 0.450 1404 0.834 * Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (v/s) critical = 0.757 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.841 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project -1'1-1- LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8 =======================__-=====a=====_========_=============a===_.==== DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP. EB L 0.142 0.450 60.0 7.4 538 0.0 1.00 7.4 B 17.3 C TR 0.847 0.450 60.0 11.1 592 7.7 1.00 18.9 C WB L 0.340 0.450 60.0 8.1 330 0.2 1.00 8.4 B 7.9 B T 0.245 0.450 60.0 7.8 802 0.0 1.00 7.8 B R 0.084 0.450 60.0 7.2 530 0.0 1.00 7.2 B NB L 0.348 0.450 60.0 8.2 176 0.5 1.00 8.7 B 9.6 B TR 0.565 0.450 60.0 9.2 1411 0.4 1.00 9.7 B SB L 0.212 0.450 60.0 7.6 311 0.1 1.00 7.7 B 13.9 B TR 0.834 0.450 60.0 11.0 1404 3.2 1.00 14.2 B Intersection Delay = 12.6 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and no project . . ,,-; _1~fJ- APPENDIX B-PARTII HCM SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS PM PEAK HOUR "PROPOSED PROJECT" --- - IJ /- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ....**.........***....****..**.........**************************.*.****** INTERSECTION.. J Street/Third Avenue AREA TYPE.... .OTHER ANALYST.......PAB DATE..........12-01-1992 TIME..........PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 85 109 57 60 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 277 178 692 951 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 39 56 106 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (t) (t) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 50 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 50 Y 22.8 3 SB 0.00 2.00 y 20 0 0.91 50 Y 22.8 3 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.163 0.450 7.5 B 17.8 C TR 0.856 0.450 19.5 C WB L 0.380 0.450 8.7 B 8.0 B T 0.252 0.450 7.8 B R 0.084 0.450 7.2 B NB L 0.376 0.450 9.0 B 9.9 B TR 0.599 0.450 10.0 B SB L 0.227 0.450 7.8 B 15.3 c TR 0.870 0.450 15.7 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 13.4 (aec/veh) V/C . 0.863 LOS.B ." _/JZ-- 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 **********-*************...***************************.*.************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION .===========.===~:~===========..=.=========================-========== NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET........ J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET...... Third Avenue AREA TYPE................ . . . . . . . . . .. OTHER NAME OF THE ANALyST................. PAS DATE OF THE ANALySIS................ 12-01-1992 TIME PERIOD ANALyZED................ PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project TRAFFIC VOLUMES ===========::========================================================= EB WB NB SB LEFT 85 109 57 60 THRU 277 178 692 951 RIGHT 220 39 56 106 RTOR 0 0 0 0 (RTOR volume must be less than or equal to RIGHT turn volumes. ) Ij~3 - INTERSECTION GEOMETRY ========================================..=====-======.-.============= Page-2 NUMBER OF LANES PER DIRECTION INCLUDING TURN BAYS: EASTBOUND = 2 WESTBOUND = 3 NORTHBOUND = 3 EB WB NB LANE TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH TYPE WIDTH 1 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 2 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 3 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 4 5 6 L - EXCLUSIVE LEFT LANE LT - LEFT/THROUGH LANE LR - LEFT/RIGHT ONLY LANE LTR - LEFT/THROUGH/RIGHT LANE ADJUSTMENT FACTORS SOUTHBOUND = 3 SB TYPE WIDTH L 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 T - EXCLUSIVE THROUGH LANE TR - THROUGH/RIGHT LANE R - EXCLUSIVE RIGHT LANE ===========::=:=====:=============:-=:-.-============================= GRADE HEAVY VEH. ADJACENT PKG BUSES (t) (t) Y/N (Nm) (Nb) PHF ---------- EASTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 WESTBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 NORTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 SOUTHBOUND 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.91 Nm = number of parking maneuvers/hr; Nb = number of buses stopping/hr CONFLICTING PEDS PEDESTRIAN BUTTON (peds/hour) (Y/N) (min T) ARRIVAL TYPE ---------------- ----------------- ------------ EASTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 WESTBOUND 50 Y 25.8 3 NORTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 SOUTHBOUND 50 Y 22.8 3 . min T . minimum green time for pedestrians IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project . - IJ-'f- SIGNAL SETTINGS - OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS Page-3 PRETIMED =======================c==========c=====_===_====._=============:=:=== CYCLE LENGTH = 60 . 0 LOST TIME/PHASE = 3.0 " EAST/WEST PHASING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE-1 PHASE-2 PHASE-3 PHASE-4 EASTBOUND LEFT X TIIRU X RIGHT X PEDS X WESTBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X NORTHBOUND RT SOUTHBOUND RT GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NORTH/SOUTH PHASING ---------------------------------------------------------------------- PHASE-1 PHASE-2 NORTHBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X SOUTHBOUND LEFT X THRU X RIGHT X PEDS X EASTBOUND RT WESTBOUND RT GREEN 26.0 0.0 YELLOW + ALL RED 4.0 0.0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION PHASE-3 PHASE-4 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF TIlE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME of THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF TIlE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project ----- _ )J J - VOLUME ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-4 ====c======ca========..================_.============================= LANE LANE ADJ. MVT. ADJ. LANE GRP. NO. UTIL. GROWTH GRP. PROP PROP VOL. PHF VOL. GRP. VOL. LN FACT. FACT. VOL. LT RT ------ EB LT 85 0.98 87 L 87 1 1. 000 1. 000 87 1.00 0.00 TH 277 0.98 283 TR 507 1 1.000 1. 000 507 0.00 0.44 RT 220 0.98 224 WB LT 109 0.88 124 L 124 1 1. 000 1. 000 124 1.00 0.00 TH 178 0.88 202 T 202 1 1. 000 1. 000 202 0.00 0.00 RT 39 0.88 44 R 44 1 1. 000 Looo 44 0.00 1.00 NB LT 57 0.93 61 L 61 1 1. 000 1. 000 61 1.00 0.00 TH 692 0.93 744 TR 804 2 1. 050 1. 000 845 0.00 0.07 RT 56 0.93 60 SB LT 60 0.91 66 L 66 1 1. 000 1. 000 66 1.00 0.00 TH 951 0.91 1045 TR 1162 2 1.050 1. 000 1220 0.00 0.10 RT 106 0.91 116 '* Denotes a De facto Left Turn LAne Group IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project _ I j~6 - SUPPLEMENTARY WORKSHEET FOR LEFT-TURN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR Page-5 INPUT VARIABLES =================================================ze======================= SB EB WB NB ------------------------------~------------------------------------------- Cycle Length, C (sec) Effective Green, G (sec) Number of Lanes, N Total Approach Flow Rate, Va (vph) Mainline Flow Rate, Vm (vph) Left-Turn Flow Rate, Vlt (vph) Proportion of LT, PIt Opposing Lanes, No Opposing Flow Rate, Vo (vph) Prop. of LT in Opp. Vol., PI to 60.0 27.0 1 594 507 87 1. 000 1 247 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 370 247 124 1. 000 1 507 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 866 804 61 1. 000 2 1162 0.000 60.0 27.0 1 1227 1162 66 1. 000 2 804 0.000 COMPUTATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB EB WB NB -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sop=(1800No)/(1+Plto((400+Vm)/(1400-Vm))) Yo=Vo/Sop Gu=(G-C'Yo}/(l-Yo) Fs=(875-0.625Vo)/1000 Pl=Plt(1+((N-1)G)/(Fs*Gu+4.5))) Gq=G-Gu Pt=l-Pl Gf=2Pt(1-(Pt"0.5Gq))/Pl El=1800/(1400-Vo) Fm=Gf/G+(Gu/G) (1/(1+Pl(El-1)))+(2/G) (1+P1) F1t=(Fm+N-1)/N IDENTIFYING INFORMATION 1800 0.137 21. 7 62 0.721 1. 000 5.238 0.000 0.000 1.56 0.665 0.665 1800 0.282 14.055 0.558 1. 000 12.945 0.000 0.000 2.02 0.406 0.406 3600 0.323 11.281 0.149 1.000 15.719 0.000 0.000 7.55 0.203 0.203 3600 0.223 17.506 0.372 1. 000 9.494 0.000 0.000 3.02 0.363 0.363 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project -/j~'7- SATURATION FLOW ADJUSTMENT WORKSHEET Page-6 _===:==========_._.....==:===::_=======._.======_=========ca=========== IDEAL ADJ. SAT. NO. f f f f f f f f SAT. !"LOW LNS W HV G P BB A RT LT FLOW EB L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1. 000 0.665 1184 TR 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.800 1. 000 1. 000 0.923 1. 000 1316 WB L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 0.406 724 T 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1782 R 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 0.800 1. 000 1. 000 0.826 1. 000 1178 NB L 1800 1 1.000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.203 363 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.987 1. 000 3131 S8 L 1800 1 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 1. 000 0.363 646 TR 1800 2 1. 000 0.990 1. 000 0.890 1. 000 1. 000 0.983 1. 000 3117 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------~- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project _ I S-ef - CAPACITY ANALYSIS WORKSHEET Page-7 ====================================================================== ADJ. ADJ. SAT. FLOW LANE GROUP FLOW RATE FLOW RATE RATIO GREEN RATIO CAPACITY vie (v) (s) (vis) (!l/C) (c) RATIO --------- --------- ----------- ---------- EB L 87 1184 0.073 0.450 533 0.163 TR 507 1316 0.385 0.450 592 0.856 . WB L 124 724 0.171 0.450 326 0.380 T 202 1782 0.114 0.450 802 0.252 R 44 1178 0.038 0.450 530 0.084 NB L 61 363 0.169 0.450 163 0.376 TR 845 3131 0.270 0.450 1409 0.599 SB L 66 646 0.102 0.450 291 0.227 TR 1220 3117 0.391 0.450 1403 0.870 * Cycle Length, C = 60.0 sec. Sum (vis) critical = 0.777 Lost Time Per Cycle, L = 6.0 sec. X critical = 0.863 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST IWEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTHISOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project _ I 0"7 - LEVEL-OF-SERVICE WORKSHEET Page-8 ======================....==============================a====:======== DELAY LANE DELAY LANE LANE DELAY LOS v/c g/C CYCLE d GROUP d PROG. GRP. GRP. BY BY RATIO RATIO LEN. 1 CAP. 2 FACT. DELAY LOS APP. APP. EB L 0.163 0.450 60.0 7.4 533 0.0 1.00 7.5 B 17.8 C TR 0.856 0.450 60.0 11.2 592 8.3 1.00 19.5 C WB L 0.380 0.450 60.0 8.3 326 0.4 1.00 8.7 B 8.0 B T 0.252 0.450 60.0 7.8 802 0.0 1.00 7.8 B R 0.084 0.450 60.0 7.2 530 0.0 1.00 7.2 B NB L 0.376 0.450 60.0 8.3 163 0.7 1.00 9.0 B 9.9 B TR 0.599 0.450 60.0 9.4 1409 0.5 1.00 10.0 B SB L 0.227 0.450 60.0 7.7 291 0.1 1.00 7.8 B 15.3 C TR 0.870 0.450 60.0 11.3 1403 4.4 1.00 15.7 C Intersection Delay = 13.4 (sec/veh) Intersection LOS = B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET..... J Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET... Third Avenue DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALySIS.... 12-01-1992 ; PM Peak Hour OTHER INFORMATION: Future Year 1995 w/2 percent growth and project . . _/&,tJ- APPENDIX C TRAFFIC ANALYSIS REPORT CONDUCTED IN AUGUST 1993 -Ih /- _jhk '" aSSOC'aI" August 23, 1993 Mr. Jeff Guth American Stores Properties Inc. Lucky Store 6569 Knott Avenue Buena Park, California 90620-1158 RE: Draft Technical Report - Lucky Site Rezoning Traffic Impact Analysis Dear Mr. Guth: JHK & Associates (JHK) is pleased to submit this Draft Technical Report for the Lucky Site Rezoning Traffic Impact Analysis. This report documents the potential daily and peak hour trip generation for each land use scenario and evaluates the potential for "passerby trip" behavior for the types of land uses proposed for the site under each scenario. Given these land use and peak hour trip generation assumptions, Year 1995 peak hour intersection operations are evaluated at the primary project intersection located at Third A venue/J Street in Chula Vista. BACKGROUND Proposed Project American Stores Properties, Inc., the project developer, is proposing the construction of a 50,000 square foot grocery store and 12,900 square feet of associated retail commercial spacC' on 5.8 acre site located on the southwest quadrant of the intersection at J Street/Third Avenue in Central Chula Vista. A total of 315 parking spaces will be constructed on the project site to serve the grocery store and the other retail commercial uses. Attendant with the development of the Lucky Grocery Store project is a rezoning of the site from Professional Office to Commercial land use. Trip Generation Rates The issue of passerby trip contribution is critical to the understanding of the actual impacts the proposed project will have on the primary study area intersection of J Street/Third Avenue. Based on adopted SANDAG trip generation rates, the proposed 50,000 square foot grocery store will generate a total of 150 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). The associated 12,900 square feet of retail commercial space to be located on the site is expected to generate 40 daily trips per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Some of the trips generated by the project will already be on the street system and linked with other trips. This type of driver behavior is known as "passerby trips." The City of San Diego has completed research on passerby trips through detailed surveys at similar sites in the _!iPJ.-- _jhk '" aSSOCiates Mr. Jeff Guth August 23. 1993 Page 2 City of San Diego. The reconunended cumulative or linked trip rate for a grocery store and retail conunercial spaces is 40 trips per 1.000 square feet of GFA. Thus. based on the City of San Diego Passerby Study. approximately 69 percent of the total number of vehicles associated with !.'e proposed site were assumed to already be in the traffic stream. This trip reduction was confmned with the City Traffic Engineer (Mr. Harold Rosenberg. November 10. 1992). Trip GenerationlDistribution Table 1 sununarizes the estimated daily PM peak hour traffic volumes associated with the proposed project (grocery store and conunercial shops). As shown on this table. although the total daily trips generated by the site under the proposed project land use scenario would be over 8.000. the actual amount of new trips (those not already in the traffic stream for other trip purposes) would be approximately 2.516. During the PM peak hour. a total of 206 new trips would be added to the Year 1995 traffic volumes as a result of the proposed project (see Final Repon). It is imponant to understand that for the analysis of roadway segments and intersections adjacent to the project site. the cumulative daily and peak hour trips were added to future traffic volumes. For the analysis of internal circulation and driveway operations. the total daily trips (cumulative plus passerby trips) would be used. Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions The following assumptions were used in the projection of future Year 1995 traffic volumes on the study area circulation network: . First. since the existing Lucky Grocery Store building. currently located on the nonhwest quadrant of the J Street/Third A venue intersection. is expected to remain and be convened into other retail uses. no reduction in trip generation from the existing site has been assumed. . Second. a standard annual growth rate of two percent has been applied to existing daily and PM peak hour traffic volumes to simulate expected increases in traffic due to other development projects in the Qty of Chula Vista. The resulting volumes were used to define Year 1995 "No Project" conditions. . Third. as stated in the previous section. only cumulative trips associated with the project (total trips minus passerby trips) were added to the Year 1995 Base Condition volumes. . No changes to the existing intersections geometries and signal phasing were assumed. -lb3- - hk &- Issociates -J z ~ 1-. < 1:1I: [;;:i Z [;;:i t.:I e:: ~ 1:1I: ~ o = - ~ cu :; :25 CIo ~ :!: CIo Q Z < >- ..:I - < Q Q 5 :!: 5 .~ ~ .. - ce !:!", '5 - 'C a.. !~ c:I. .;: I-cu ...- - .. -; c.:: Q II!! ;'1 !i ~ ~ ~I N ~ ~I r-- .::: g- ~ - ~ .,., - .,I .:: ~ g- ~ ~ . N o _ .,., ~ - fI) I c ~ "1. N \0 - ~ oc .,I "": ~ ~ - ~ g. c;5 11 'C ~ ~ 151 ts -56 U '::I ~.. ~= !.M .Ii :a ,5 ft,! :d 6 !!... ._ 0 '" '" 1i'~ 'e''a ""Ii ~~ -Q.5 2] -5 '" '" ~ i'a ~~ ~ '" TiI~ -5.; l! ~ u U :fit: > ... . o jS, "'S f ~ e ~ 'a 15 S >> ~R . .. ~,~ '" c:I..~ ~~>> 'S >>.. >>~ ~ - > '01 Ci 'C QC'tl - UI ~ ... '" O.in c >> o'a '= Ii ~~ ~,5 Ii ,- '" .J~ .c", .= 2 ~ 6b E.; i M ut: s. ~i: U '5 -5>> Sof "8~ :g !..,; 01 '" C '" C U c'= .D._ u ."E~ = !.~ ~'S,S - >>." ..-c -5 '01 .. ." ~ II ~ -",!.! .~ Q., t: ii'S tIO > U f;I 'O.~ >. TiI .. h _ ~ ie~ '" '" e cu_ u :- c: - U U -5d,:d .. .,.., ","- ~ if ,~ c jS,~~ 'S11 ,~ 8.,~ "e-~ ="" E" . a~J: N ~ i::i -I Ii 1:1 11 . tI! .36 ~ jj I I~'-I- _jhk &< associates Mr. leff Guth August 23. 1993 Page 4 Intersection Capacity Analysis Table 2 summarizes the forecasted PM peak hour intersection operating conditions under the Proposed Project land use scenario. As shown on this table. even with the two percent annual growth in traffic. the intersection of 1 Street/Third A venue is expected to maintain LOS B conditions. Under the proposed project land use scenario. the project contributes four percent to the total PM peak hour entering volumes at this intersection. Appendix B of this document contains the detailed HCM worksheets used in this analysis. Table 2 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS FUTURE YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS "Prooosed Proiect" Cumulative Approach Approach Project Trip Intersection Aooroach Delav (sec) LOS Contribution 1 SLfThird Ave. EB 17.8 C 3% WB 8.0 B 5% NB 9.0 B 5% SB 15.3 C 4% Overall Intersection Operations 13.4 B 4% Source: JHK 4. ANo;ia15 Summary The analysis conducted for the proposed project concluded that from a circulation perspective. no significant impacts would occur as a result of the project under Year 1995 _ conditions. The traffic generated from the proposed project site is not expected to significantly impact traffic operations at this intersection. CITY'S LAND USE SCENARIO With the completion of the rezoning as required for the Lucky Grocery Store Project, there is a possibilty that the project site could be developed with additional intensity beyond that of the proposed projecL .-- -/ &.:, - _jhk '" IlSOCoa,CS Mr. Jeff Guth August 23, 1993 Page 5 Based on applicable development regulations and required land area set asided to meet the development regulations as they pertain to the Lucky Store Site, the City determined that the approximate maximum amount of development that could occur on the site is as follows: Land Use Tvpe Total Square Foota!!e RetaiVCommercial Shops (Same Proportious as Proposed Project) 95,000 Conunercial Office 150,000 For the puposes of this analysis, it was assumed that twice the amount of GFA as the proposed project would be constructed, with the same mix and proportion of land uses. This condition would produce a "worst case" analysis with a total of approximately 125,800 square feet of retaiVcommercial shops in the same proportion as the proposed projecL Table 3 shows the assumed land use, and peak hour cumulative trips that could be generated on the site uner the City's Land Use Scenario. As shown on this table, the project site could generate over 16,000 daily trips, with 5,032 new daily trips (minus 69% passerby tirps). During the PM peak hour, 312 additional trips would be added to the 1995 volumes as result of, the City's Land Use Scenario. For the Commercial office scenario of 150,000 square feet, a total of 2,550 new trips would be generated. This value represents the approximate loading of the propsed project without the increase in developmenL Thus, only the RetaiVCommercial shops alternative with a doubling of allowable square footage was tested. Traffic Impact Anal)'sis . Assumpitons The following assumptions were used to determin Year 1995 traffic conditions under the City's land Use Scenario: . The same distibution developed for the "proposed project" was used. . Only cumulative trips (total trips minus passerby trips) were added to year 1995 Base Condition Volumes. . No changes to the existing geometries and signal phasing were assumed. _ I (P b - . _jhk '" aSSOC1ates ! -I ... >. ... '" o .. 0.- C ~ '" 0.....1"" S "'I :ga c >. ::!: !, c5 OON; Is !t OO!! _-.r N- .~ a g. .- t:a ~ I. -5", c u '= ~ =1 O\.....la ~~I !a U Iii ~-5 Hl ooN_ N- i .!:! .5 . c: .g1 ~~I~ '" 0 >..- a " ~NI ~! .. ... ~ ~..!! U = .....0\ .. N II = -S~ > ~ :a 'u -s'" .- f "'0; ~ ~ Z 8 E 51:: 0 .. ~ II .. C ~ :,! - ~-~ ,!!O_ ~ '" U < ,,::: .- B ~~ '" .- c:t ~'E: ... '" IoJ 8~1:! ~~~ N\oI:I .. c ... . .....- II 0 g~ Z =i- .= , '" "}. ~"}. e'" IoJ u N N ..,.- IIIN c:>.0 U 'S c t,).~ oS>. g. .I: '" 00&> ... >. ... .. - .1:0:; U c:t 1! ~ ~ ~~ coc i~~ N\oI:I = .. ",.. c:t 8~1:! e u "'0 Q., r,,; a- .. '" c: ~ "''''= ~= -s-s .8 E:.S2 r: oC "'- \01:1 ~ 0 - _cc ~.5 .- ... :c .. :!:1 ~ ~ f") :III: c:>.1! = c:>. u ", '" O'S ... II < :; = ~ .5 - ~ ~ J:: .:::. 4:!..: ~ ;; ~"'O ~ ..:= . .... .c'- c ::!: c:>. 0" . ~g- ;j ....... '" 0" '" '" ", '" g. 1: 8 '" 88 -s f .!! II c ~ II '" = Q >.- -8 u co .!:! So u Z - co -- out:: ;j.s ~ < .- c:t ~- ~- :c 1;1 " :1~ "'~ ~ II 1;1 >- Q u u - ~~ o.~ >. .J ... ;; tU - .8:;~ < .. Q .8~ ee'i ~ Q ~ .S = = e .::.::! c: .. r.:: c::.: . ... N ftft c: ~ II . c: ~i ~ ~1 ftft '!8 -s.~ 8 88 ---" ::!: 0; - ."'" i~ ... = .... "'0 r - ", E II .. ~ .. ~ ,00 -SO if .= c: =- 8"'; II ;!.s ON >. '" e 0 "'- _N o;i: c:>. c:>.:I = II 'S 1 ~ C 0"'" 11 II '" 1: .. II c:>. " !,c:>. .~ 8.. E = 'S ~ i- .. e.- t - ... >. .- = c:>. ~ '" {I) '" ~ - >. > E' ."'" j~l 8- ! 8- oa to)-= aJ!e {I) Q-S~ .I: .I: < ...c:>. fCl) fCl) ra:I r! 0- '1:1 so; " ~~B ... .. = CI) .- .3 en .- ..U ~~ ~~ .JZ - N ~ II E '" II E <- ;,; ~ g ~ ~ e i-ti ~ ii - 0 j ou u 08 ~z z -/~1- . _jhk &< associa,cs Mr. Ieff Guth August 23, 1993 Page 7 Intersection Capacity Analysis. City Land Use Scenario Table 4 compares the forecasted PM peak hour intersection operating conditions under the Prop~ed Project and the City's Land Use Scenario. As shown on this table, the LOS at thisintersection is expected to remain unchanl!ed under the City's Land Use Scenario. The Appendix of this document contains the detailed HCM worksheets used in this analysis. Table 4 PM PEAK HOUR INTERSEC'TION OPERATIONS FUTURE YEAR 1995 CONDITIONS Overall IDtersectioD Operations . ProDosed Prolect" Approach Approach Approach Approach ADDroch Delav (sec) LOS Delav (see) LOS EB 17.8 C 18.3 C WB 8.0 B 18.2 B NB 9.9 B 10.3 B SB 1S.3 C 17.4 C 13.4 B 14.4 B Intersection J SI./Third Ave. _:1HKA.""""_ Summary The PM peak hour capacity analysis found that the intersection of I StteetlThird Avenue would maintain LOS B with both the proposed project and the City's Land Use Scenario, that represents twice the level of development of the proposed project Thus, from a circulation perspective, no significant impacts were found as a result of the proposed project or the City's . Land Use Scenario under Year 1995 conditions. It is important to recognize that as a result of the original traffic analysis conducted for the proposed project, the project applicant has committed to providing an additional lane at the subject intersection. This additional lane would be placed along the norhtern edge of the property, on I Street, and would allow for an exclusive right turn only lane for eastbound to southbound movement Also, the City is still considering the possibility of providing exclusive _ I t!- _jhk '" assomrcs Mr. Jeff Guth August 23. 1993 Page 8 (protected) left turn phasing on Third A venue for nonhbound and southbound turning movements. This would assist drivers in the completion of left turns at this intersection which are difficult under peak conditions today due to lack of adequate gaps in nonh/south through traffic. It has been a pleasure working with American Stores Properties and FORMA on this project H you have any questions regarding methodologies. assumptions. or findings of this study. please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, JHK & ASSOCIATES j)~~/II~ Daniel F. Marum Senior Transportation Planner DFM:cb cc: Leslie Freeman. FORMA Barbara Reid. City of Chula Vista -/~9- . .. _jhk '" .SSOCII'es APPENDIX · Proposed Lucky Project HCM Analysis · City Land Use Scenario HCM Analysis -II tJ-- . 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS. ~MARY REPORT . *********************************************************************** INTERSECTION..J Street/Thrid Street AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.......JHK & Associates DATE..........08-17-1993 TIME..........PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Lucky Project AnalysiS -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB . EB WB NB SB . LT. 85 109 57 60 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 277 178 692 951 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 39 56 106 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ('l.) ('l.) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 50 Y 25.8 c. WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 50 Y 25.8 ~ .' NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 50 Y 22.8 ~ " SB 0.0(' 2.(>0 Y 20 0 0.91 50 y 22.8 ~ " -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-l PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-l EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 26.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 26.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.163 0.450 7.5 B 17.8 C TR 0.856 0.450 19.5 C WE L 0.380 0.450 8.7 B 8.0 B T 0.252 0.450 7.8 B R 0.084 0.450 7.2 B NB L 0.376 0.450 9.0 B 9.9 E TR 0.599 0.450 10.0 B SB L 0.227 0.450 7.8 B 15.3 C TR 0.870 0.450 15.7 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- TERSECTION: Delay = 13.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.863 LOS = B ~/11 --- . 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ************************************************************************** INTERSECTION..J Street/Thrid Street AREA TYPE.....OTHER ANALYST.......JHK & Associates DATE..........08-17-1993 TIME..........PM Peak Hour COMMENT.......Lucky w/Suggested Project Volumes -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES : GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 95 119 57 bO L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0. L 12.0 TH 283 183 724 983 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 39 bb 11b . 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 . RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE ('X) ('X) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.98 50 Y 25.8 ~ -' WB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.88 50 Y 25.8 .. 0' NB 0.00 2.00 Y 20 0 0.93 50 y 22.8 .. .' SB 0.00 2.00 y 20 0 0.91 50 Y 22.8 .. .' -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = bO.O PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 2b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 2b.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.184 0.450 7.5 B 18.3 C TR 0.8bb 0.450 20.3 C WB L 0.421 0.450 9.1 B 8.2 B T 0.259 0.450 7.8 B R 0.084 0.450 7.2 B NB L 0.404 0.450 9.4 B 10.3 B TR 0.b34 0.450 10.3 B SB L 0.243 0.450 7.8 B 17.4 C TR 0.905 0.450 17.9 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.885 LOS . B ___/?-z.-.--- iD:~. AUG 17 '93 15:06 GIROUX 9~550CIATE5 r .........Uu.A ex. .t'Lll1I~r If . ~.. ~ &_'" """"-~. MEMO I Fa.. q TO: Barbara Reid; City of Chula Vista FROM: Hans Giroux; Giroux & Associates RE: Lucky Store #257 Site August 17, 1993 DATE: We have reviewed the information you provided relative to noise impacts from development of the proposed project site. The issues we evaluated were as follows: 1. What constraints should be placed on site uses in a CUP if the site is developed as a grocery store and ancillary retail uses. 2. What is the worst-case noise impaot potential for commercial development if the site is not developed as a grocery store. For development as a grocery store, we determined that noise impacts would be less than significant if a 6-foot block wall is constructed along the western s1 te boundary and a number of operational constraints were adopted as follows: 1. No delivery truck traffic shall occur in the alley between the rear of the store and the nearest homes from 10 PM to 7 AM. 2. No truck/trailers shall be mechanical equipment such running during the time trom parked in the alley with any as refrigerator/freezer units 10 PM - 7 AM. 3. The trash compactor shall not be operated between the hours from 10 PM - 7 AM, Monday through Friday, 10 PM.- 8 AM on Saturdays, and 10 PM - 9 AM on Sundays and holidays. 4. Refuse or recycled cardboard truoks shall not collect waste materials during those times when operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited. /'11# Sky hrk onw, Suite 2/0. IniDe, CaJVomiA 927/4 . PboIIe (7/4) 8JJ-8609 - Pu (714) 8SJ-8b!!...;7 3 ___ RUG 17 '93 15:07 GIROUX & ASSOCIATES ( P.2 . ,... ... -2- The hours of operation do not measurably affect the noise impact at the adjacent homes because the building shell will almost totally block noise propagation from cars in the parking lot as the only significant noise source. We do not believe that sales hours will have any adverse effect as long as the above conditions are met. We reviewed thE list of permitted uses that coul~ be located on the property if a non-conditional use were developed instead of the grocery store. The uses that have noise impact potential include: , Automobile Installation of Accessories Animal Hospital Appliance Repair (major) Bars, Lounges, Cabarets Dancing Studios - Nightclubs Drive-in and Sit-down Restaurants Health Studios and spas Lawn Mower Repair Music SChools/Stores Newspaper Publishing parking Lots/Garages (commercial) Pet Shops our recommendation to limit possible noise impact is to establish r~oise performance standard for any potentially noisy alternative uses. ~'~ ;:r'lll",ondatio~r__-aPP:l:'Opriate perfo"""..nce standard "wolild b h ny site use should not create noise levels exceedifiq 65 dB by day or 55 dB at night (10 PM - 7 AM) at the property line of the nearest residential use.~ If there is some way to incorporate such a standard into any conditions of approval for the current proposed action, it would provide an adequate safeguard for the existing residences regardless of the ultimate site use. - /71/ - ~cP f...~ ~t? , .r!- ~d) ORDINANCE NO. 2577 <" <0 J \ A""'') ~ . ') .k&IDINANCE OF TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING ~,'-:QtE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABUSHED BY SECTION {-v<' <>i9.18.010 OF TIlE CHlJLA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING ~. rJ~ TIlE 5.8 ACRE PARCEL LOCATED AT TIlE SOUTHWEST CORNER va ~'y~ OF 11llRD AVENUE AND J STREET FROM C-O, OFFICE ~.;;..O COMMERCIAL AND R-l, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TO C-C-P, CENTRAL COMMERCIAL, PRECISE PLAN. WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a rezone was filed with the Planning Department of the City of ChuIa Vista on December 2, 1993 by American Properties IDe., and WHEREAS, the property consists of approximately 5.8 acres located at the southwesl corner of Third A venue and J Street and diagrammatically presented on the area map attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, said application requested to change the existing C-O, Office Commercial and R-l, Single Family Residential zone to C-C-P, Central Commercial, Precise Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said rezoning application and notice of said hearing, together with its puI1)Ose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 21 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m. October 13,1993 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the planniT1g Commission found that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on 15-92-42, and voted 6-0-1 (Tuchscher-conflict of interest) to recommend that the City council approved the rezoning from C-O, OffICe Commercial to C-C-P Central Commercial Precise Plan, subject to Precise Plan standards listed on the Draft City Council Qrdina"",,; and NOW, TIIEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows: SECTION I: Based on the findings and recommendations of the Environmental Review Coordinator, the City Council does hereby adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-42. 8-1 INFORMATION PACKET SCANNED AT FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE ON: /Vc9// c2 /993 / SECTION D: Findings. The City Council finds that the zoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that the public necessi ,convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support the rezoning to C-C-P, ntral Commercial Precise Plan zone. SECTION ill: that the 5.8 acres 1 Street, as shown in Exhibit A, ~ rezoned Residential to C-C-P, Central Commercial at the southwest comer of Third Avenue and "J" C-O, Commercial Office and R-l, Single Family ise Plan. SECTION IV: pursuant to section 19. 6.041 of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds that the following circumstances are ev nt which allows the application of the "P", Precise Plan Modifying District to the subject Trash compactor, if located outside the building envelope, between the hours from 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m., Monday p.m. to 8:00 a.m. Saturdays; and 10:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m. holidays. om single family residential uses by streets, h as lower impact commercial uses and/or low density residential district to the west rlying zone regulations do not allow the ensure compan'ble coexistence among . ent of the site shall meet the following Commercial districts are ideally separated significant physical features and transitional uses higher density residential uses. The subject site abu which creates a unique circumstance for which the City sufficient control to achieve a proper relationship the various surrounding land uses. Therefore, develop Precise Plan Standards: 1. New access driveways along "J" Stteet parcel located directly across J Stteet. 1 be aligned with the commercial 2. Development of the parcel shall be limited minimum building size of 50,000 sq. ft. No shall be allowed. a single tenant building and itional freestanding buildings 3. No delivery truck ttaffic shall occur in the alley d to 7:00 a.m. 4. not be operated gh Friday; 10:00 n Sundays and . 5. Refuse or recycled cardboard trucks shall not operate during operation of the refuse compactor is prohibited. 6. No permitted land use shall create noise levels ex,.......;ng 65 db by day or 55 db at night (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) as measured from the ploperty line of the nearest residential use. times when . ~-9' ~\o~ sp<( ~ ~~ ~0 <<-<J'~ ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA "'~<:::> CERTIFYING THE FINAL PROGRAM ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ~(jv (FPEIR 90-01) FOR THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT; PREZONING MOST <::i OF THE OTAY RANCH TO THE PC (PLANNED COMMUNITY) lONE; MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS OF FACT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM, AND ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS. INFORMATION PACKET SCANNED AT FIRST READING OF THIS ORDINANCE ON: 11)-~8- 9.3 ORDINANCE NO. 2578 I. Recitals A. Project Site. WHEREAS, the area of the land which is subject of this ordinance is diagrammatically represented on Attachment G (Attachments A through F omi tted) , attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; is commonly known as Otay Ranch Project; and for the purpose of general description herein consists of approximately 22,509 acres (the Project Site defined in the Di scret i onary Approvals Reso 1 uti on 17298, exc 1 udi ng 3 EastLake Land Swap Parcels, approximately 169 acres in size, and 390 acres within jurisdiction of the City of San Diego) located south of the rural community of Jamu1, 2 miles north of the United States-Mexico border, abutting the western Chu1a Vista City limits, and the eastern boundary of which is generally State Route 94 ("Project Site"); and, B. Project. WHEREAS, a person having control over all or a portion of the development of the Project Site, to-wit: the Otay Vista Associates, L.P., (formerly known as the Baldwin Vista Associates, L.P.) ("Developer") has applied to the City for approval of an Otay Ranch Project (New Town Plan). The proposal has been modified throughout project review, resulting in the final project to develop a mixed use (residential, commercial and industrial) community of approximately 22,509 acres, which excludes approximately 169 acres identified as the EastLake Land Swap Parcels (proposed residential and commercial General Plan land use designations), and 390 acres within jurisdiction of the City of San Diego) and allow a maximum of 23,483 dwelling units, all of which is more specifically described in Section 2.0 "Project Description" of the document entitled "Candidate Findings of Fact", known as document number C093-226, a a copy of whi ch is on fi 1 e in the offi ce of the City C1 erk, to the Discretionary Approvals Resolution incorporated by this reference. ("Project"). (References to the "Project" herein refer to the project description contained in the Candidate Findings of Fact, which takes precedence over any inconsistencies 1- f COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Itl Meeting Date 11109/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution 17 J .?'c:?Amending the Fiscal Year 1993-94 Budget to Upgrade 1.0 Police Peace Officer to Police Sergeant Supervise the Police Department's Street Team, and, appropriating and transferring funds therefor. :-' SUBMITTED BY: Chief of POlicetvvJ I~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ b~ tA~ (4/5th's Vote: Yes...x.. No_) As part of the FY 1993-94 budget process, the Police Department requested an additional five Peace Officer positions, funded through Development Impact Fees, to provide the Chief of Police more flexibility to address the increasing number of street robberies. The proposed Resolution would upgrade one of the five Peace Officer positions approved in the FY 1992-93 budget to Police Sergeant. The additional Police Sergeant is needed to ensure the effectiveness of the Street Team and to appropriately integrate its efforts with those of on-duty patrol officers. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Resolution The FY 1993-94 budget included a total of 86.0 Peace Officer positions, an increase of 7.0 positions over the FY 1992-93 budget. All seven of the additional positions were designated to achieve the Police Department's primary goal: preventing crime before it occurs. Two of the additional positions resulted in veteran staff being assigned to positions as School Resource Officers. The cost of the two School Resource Officers, who have been in place since the first summer session, are shared equally by the Police Department and the Sweetwater Unified High School District. The other five additional positions will free-up experienced staff to form a "Street Team." The five person Street Team will provide proactive law enforcement services designed to reduce street crime. The Street Team will employ a non-traditional approach in its effort to prevent crime before it occurs. The officers will develop a network of professional and street-level relationships to enhance criminal intelligence. Such intelligence will aid in a variety of law enforcement activities that will help prevent crime. The Street Team will work both in their uniforms and in plain clothes assignments. This will enable the Team to have a presence on the street to deter crime while retaining the flexibility to gain the tactical benefits of plain clothes when appropriate. The Street Team will work irregular hours based on the needs of the community. By working at irregular hours, criminals will simultaneously be aware of an increased enforcement effort and be kept off-guard. Additionally, the Street Team will provide the regular /tJ- / Page 2, Item / tJ Meeting Date 11109/93 staff of Uniform Patrol Division a flexible resource that can be utilized on an as-needed basis. U sing this same proactive, cooperative and resource-focusing approach, the Regional Auto Theft Task Force, Gang Detail and School Resource Officers have been successful in preventing crime and reducing related Uniform Patrol Division resource commitments. The original plan to staff the Street Team included that it be supervised by the Sergeant in charge of the Crime Suppression Unit. Upon further review, staff determined this would not be the appropriate supervisory arrangement for the Street Team. The original plan would have increased the CSU Sergeant's span of control from eight persons in three functional details (local narcotics, regional narcotics and gang unit) to thirteen persons in four functional details. The Chief of Police and his management staff concurred that this span of control was probably too wide to provide the Street Team sufficient supervision -- especially during its formative period. Additionally, it is now clear that the Street Team will need to work in direct, daily contact with patrol officers to effect the exchange of street level intelligence and, thereby, maximize the team's crime prevention efforts. Therefore, if the proposed Resolution is approved the Police Department will place the Street Team under the supervision of a new Police Sergeant in the Uniform Patrol Division. The additional Sergeant's position will be an important component in the Street Team's success. The Street Team will be a proactive, flexible crime suppression unit. The Street Team's goal will be to prevent crime before it occurs. To accomplish that goal, the Street Team Sergeant will have to be focused, creative and resourceful with his staff, in the community and on the street. Cooperative, information-sharing relationships will need to be developed with other units of the Police Department, with other agencies and on the street. Specific crime-related objectives will have to be identified, approved and intercedant tactics successfully implemented. The Street Team will have to be in a constant evolutionary process with new approaches and tactics being identified and attempted in order to keep pace with a dynamic criminal element. Because the Street Team will work a flexible schedule, a dedicated Sergeant will be able to employ and participate in such unconventional tactical methods without incurring significant overtime expenses. It is the Police Department's conclusion that it will require a dedicated Sergeant to bring together, and utilize effectively, these diverse resources and tactical advantages to reduce street crime. A dedicated Sergeant can direct all his/her supervisory and field experience toward developing the most effective Street Team possible. Using one of the existing Sergeants assigned to the Uniform Patrol Division to supervise the Street Team is not recommended at this time. There are three concerns with adding the Street Team to the duties of one of the Sergeants currently budgeted in Patrol. Primarily, the existing Patrol Division Sergeants supervise the Peace Officers and Police Agents on their shift. A patrol shift has between eleven and seventeen Officers and Agents on duty depending upon several staffing and call for service variables. Tbe first concern, then, is that adding five more staff to an existing Sergeants supervisory duties would create span of control/supervision issues. The second issue is one of equity. Maintaining a balanced workload among persons in the same job Jt7-~ Page 3, Item ) tJ Meeting Date 11109/93 classification and serving in the same assignment is a rational management practice. Adding the Street Team would be a significant increase to one of the ten Patrol Sergeant's duties. If one of the existing Sergeants in Patrol was responsible for supervising the Street Team, his/her duties would be substantially more time consuming and complex than those of his/her peer Sergeants. Finally, there is the concern that one person may not be capable of supervising both a regular Patrol shift and the Street Team. A Patrol Sergeant works a pre-set schedule based upon his/her shift. The Street Team's unconventional tactics, as described partially above, will necessitate the Street Team Sergeant work a flexible schedule. It is very likely that there would be many instances where, based upon the tactics required to catch street criminals, a Sergeant supervising the Street Team and a patrol shift would be required to work significant hours either before or after his/her normal shift. Collectively, the effect of using an existing Patrol Sergeant to supervise the Street Team would both detract from the quality of supervision provided to patrol officers and undermine the overall effectiveness of the Street Team. Based upon these rationales, the proposed Resolution recommends that one of the positions budgeted at the Peace Officer level be upgraded to Police Sergeant. The Street Team will increase the Police Department's flexibility by increasing the array of alternative enforcement actions it can employ. Placing the Street Team within the Patrol Division will provide for the necessary integration of effort among members of the Street Team and regular uniformed officers. This recommendation will also ensure that Street Team's supervisor is given every opportunity to succeed in reducing the incidence of street crime in Chula Vista. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal Year 1993-94 fiscal impact is estimated at $15,942 based upon the personnel expenses associated with a November 1st Police Sergeant's appointment versus the personnel expenses associated with 1.0 Peace Officer trainee currently budgeted for the Street Team. FY 1993-94 expenses associated with the recommended position upgrade will be reimbursed by Development Impact Fees. Attachment 1 provides account specific information on the recommended transfers within the FY 1993-94 budget. The transfers are required to effect the budgetary transition of 5.0 Peace Officer positions from Investigative Divsion, where these positions were originally budgeted, to the Uniform Patrol Division. The Street Team is more appropriately placed within the Uniform Patrol Division for the reasons cited above. Subsequent fiscal year fiscal impact is estimated at approximately $16,966 based upon the difference in personnel expenses between 1.0 Peace Officer and 1.0 Police Sergeant at "E" step. Non-personnel expenses are approximately similar for either position. These costs will be borne by the General Fund. )tJ-;J ;f} Page 4, Item_ MPf'fing Date 11/09/93 ATfACHMENT A Transfer from Divison 100-1050 5101 5141 5142 5143 5144 Total $85,280 $18,760 $22,540 $1,240 $6,310 $134,130 Transfer to Divison 100-1040 5101 5141 5142 5143 5144 Total $98,310 $21,672 $22,540 $1,240 $6,310 $150,072 Increase in DIF Reimbursement to General Fund: $15,942 1,tJ dl RESOLUTION NO. I ?~Do RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1993-94 BUDGET TO UPGRADE 1.0 POLICE PEACE OFFICER TO POLICE SERGEANT TO SUPERVISE THE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S STREET TEAM AND APPROPRIATING AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS THEREFOR WHEREAS, as part of the FY 1993-94 budget process, the Police Department requested an additional five Peace Officers, funded through Development Impact Fees, to provide the Chief of Police more flexibility to address the increasing number of street robberies; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to upgrade one of the five Peace Officer positions approved in the FY 1992-93 budget to Police Sergeant to ensure the effectiveness of the street Team and to appropriately integrate its efforts with those of on-duty patrol officers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the fiscal year 1993-94 budget to add 1.0 Police Sergeant position and remove 1.0 peace officer position, thereby increasing the number of Police Sergeants from 16 to 17, and decreasing the number of peace officer positions from 84 to 83, to staff the Police Department's Street Team. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $15,942 is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to be reimbursed by the Police Development Impact Fees, with a $0 net effect upon the General Fund. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the following monies are to be transferred from Division 100-1050 to Division 100-1040: Transfer From Division 100-1050 5101 5141 5142 5143 5144 Total $85,280 $18,760 $22,540 $1,240 $6,310 $134,130 Transfer to Division 100-1040 5101 5141 5142 5143 5144 Total $98,310 $21,672 $22,540 $1,240 $6,310 $150,072 Increase in DIF Reimbursement to General Fund: $15,942 Presented by Approved as to form by Richard P. Emerson, Police Chief of Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney I D-$'" COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item / / Meeting Date 11/9/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / '} 3 Cl / Boundary lot adjustment for Sanibelle Partnership and authorization for Mayor to sign boundary adjustment map and grant deeds SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks and RiJecr tio~ Director of Public Wor ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ ~ . (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No...K..) Sanibelle Partners has requested a boundary lot adjustment of the property line along Hidden Vista Drive to establish property line at the top of slope. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the boundary lot adjustment and authorize Mayor to sign adjustment map and the grant deeds. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: In the course of construction of the Sanibelle Development along Hidden Vista Drive in the Terra Nova area, the developer expressed concern that the property line was at the bottom of the slope. These concerns were twofold: First, location of fence at the bottom of slope would not be consistent with the rest of development. Boundary fences are established at the top of slope. Secondly, the landscape on the downslope would require maintenance by the Open Space District. While this is not a large slope (1,117 sq. ft.), it could represent maintenance access problems for the Open Space contractors. Staff has reviewed the situation and believes it would be most advantageous to shift the property line to the top of slope. This would make the slope landscape a responsibility of the homeowners and would eliminate the potential problems expressed by the developer. It would also provide a boundary fence consistent with the entire project. Sanibelle Partnership also proposed to adjust property line at the northwest corner to transfer property (231 sq. ft.) to the open space. This would allow a smooth transition to the property line north of this project. FISCAL IMPACT: There would be a slight decrease in open space maintenance cost. WPC F:\HOMlN'ARKSREC\1356.93 1/-/ //1-;' RESOLUTION NO. /730/ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE BOUNDARY LOT ADJUSTMENT FOR SANIBELLE PARTNERSHIP AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENT MAP AND GRANT DEEDS WHEREAS, Sanibelle Partners has requested a boundary lot adjustment of the property line at the top of slope; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the request and believes it would be most advantageous to shift the property line to the tope of slope. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the boundary lot adjustment for Sanibelle Partnership shown in Adjustment Plat No. 93-12. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to sign the boundary adjustment map and grant deeds. Presented by APpr6~ as to for by ~A Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation Bruce M. Attorney C:\rs\lotadjust 1/'3 /11-'1 OJ' f1,,~ , "- " " " " " " " " " / " / 'y / / / '" ~'" &!'" 0'" u~ ~~ ...ffi:j ~~ 10.1 ~~ (J w:t ~ ~: ~ 29 o~ ,"'~ .. ~O ~ / / / / / ~) o. ~ " '" " " " " :..~_' .~ ' ~..,q..,i , c," .."'. .~, I ..... , / I> If) ~ I- o -I $II I ~ g ~~ ~!: I # " " " " " / f1" , " " / / / /' ,~< "- " " ..... " I- o -I ~ ....." ,uJ..... 0 U ..a::' " Z ./ <C......... '-, / Q..,/' "" ' ,~ ......i' // i z => fiJ , "- i / 0) 0) 0) (\.1 I- 0 -I 0 Z CL. ~ " '" '" z i!i:n u~ N ~- ~ f5!j, N "'" ~ :.'" ~ ~~ : tic .~5 "! ~ o~ ,"'~ .. ~O ~ z => o "' o ~ '" ~ o '" .. I- o -I '.... ... " /--....... , , / " , , // N........ , , , , . ..' ,-8 "', g~~~ " . ""'~ " 1--..Ya~ 0-S- N -' ... u ~ .... '" .... '" ..t! ~~ (/) Q z t:t --JQ //-:5 0..3 <(~ ::.~ ~ z u 5 e / 5" ~ ~ ;! ~ ::J '" ~ ~ ,. "' :s '" ~ => Z % ~ U 0 I? ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ /:: ,. '" " :s z ~ => % Q ~ ~ i!; I? ~ 0 ;! /:: /:: ~ '" ~ " :s .. ~ => ~ % ~ U 'j ::; N ~~ ~ /:: "'II ~ " ~iJI ~ '" .. I/'I~ VI 5 ~~ R 0 ~ ;r;;e ~ ~ m I - ""'....00:".... '.,..,.",~, ....-~"" __0", '\.) "~ ~@\~~Wlg - ~tw~ ~ \Wi.. WII LI..~~I "'1"__.. Sl"'~\.~ - ~'S TJt. lJPlfIe .............................................................. ~No Dc!e 10. -- Re" """ """ PELDc;6.~ It- (i 01'1 ",.,..., t , \ . I . . HII~\I\-~Ie lll~!!!:. , \W\.- 7.'5 ~ lil1\ ~. ~,.(6 ... \,I \\i\\_ p." Hli\ alv\E!.\'\lelMl /'fI4H~ tI'~ 6As~Htr= . ~\~ -~- 'T ~~ CJ1YOf OIUA VISTA SA'" / f'.>e.L,J,fr _ cPlE-'" ""'AcE.. /-DT AP..J &J S,,,"..I>I r //-t f ~ af COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /.;2. Meeting Date 11/9/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / ?3t1"<'approving a sewer connection and annexation agreement with Francisco J. Mares and Mai T. Do, at 4017 Palm Drive and authorizing the Mayor to execute same on behalf of the City SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public wor'1'~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ bb~1 (4/5 Vote: Yes_ No X ) In accordance with Council Policy 570-02, Francisco Javier Mares and Mai Tuyet Do have executed the required agreement in order to connect their property (in the unincorporated area of the County) to City sewer. The agreement is now ready for execution by the City. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Public Works Department, with the assistance of the Planning Department and the City Attorney has developed a standard sewer connection/annexation agreement, which has been executed by the owners of a vacant lot at 4017 Palm Drive in Bonita. The Council adopted Policy No. 570-02 (Amended) in June of 1992, which required certain conditions to be met in order to connect to City sewer, if the property is outside the City. In this case, if the property was annexed, it would create an island of unincorporated land (see Exhibit "A"). Since the San Diego Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) does not allow such islands to be created, the property may not annex immediately and must wait until such time as several other properties also annex in accordance with Section 2 of Policy 570-02. That section includes the following requirements, which have been incorporated into the agreement: . At the time the City determines that the property may be annexed it may direct the applicant to submit a petition and application to LAFCO and the owner shall diligently prosecute the completion of annexation. . The applicant shall deposit with the City ("Delayed Annexation Deposit") in an amount equal to twice the current Sewer Capacity Fee at $2,220 per EDU ($4,440.00), plus an amount of one-half of the total fees and deposits required by the City and by LAFCO for annexation and the processes leading up to annexation, including deposits for an Initial Study and Pre-Zoning processes, equal to $4,500.00, for a total of $8,940.00. /c2 -/ Page 2, Item /c2 Meeting Date 11/9/93 · Except for the portion of the Delayed Annexation Deposit charged initially for the LAFCO filing fees, that deposit will be retained by the City for any purpose and shall be transferred into the General Fund to offset any administrative, overhead or other costs the City incurs as a result of providing municipal services outside the City and the loss of general fund revenues caused by the property being outside the City. · The applicant shall pay City's usual sewer connection fees related to the project (Administration Fee ($30.00), Tap Fee ($317.00), Sewer Capacity Fee ($2,220.00), Spring Valley Assessment ($130 per acre @ 1.16 ac. = $150.80) and Front Footage Charge for sewer construction per Ordinance No. 997 ($1,840.00), totalling $4,557.80). · The applicant shall not protest any current or future procedures to annex the property. Total fees and deposits of $13,497.80 have been paid to the City by the owners, along with the agreement signed by them, with proper notarization. The agreement is now ready for Council approval. Staff recommends that Council adopt the subject resolution, authorizing the Mayor to sign it on behalf of the City. FISCAL IMPACT: A deposit of $6,940.00 has gone into the City's General Fund in accordance with Council Policy 570-02. Attachment: Exhibit "A" JWH [F:\HOMEIENGINEERIAGENDAIMARES-DO.SEW] );2-;2... RESOLUTION NO. /7.3 C?d2.. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A SEWER CONNECTION AND ANNEXATION AGREEMENT WITH FRANCISCO J. MARES AND MAl T. DO, AT 4017 PALM DRIVE AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WHEREAS, in accordance with Council Policy 570-02, Francisco Javier Mares and Mai Tuyet Do have executed the required agreement in order to connect their property (in the unincorporated area of the County) to city sewer. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve a Sewer Connection and Annexation Agreement with Francisco J. Mares and Mai T. Do, at 4017 Palm Drive, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute same agreement for and on behalf of the city f Chul vista. Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works C:\rs\mares /;J..' 3//).-'1 k------ \ --------< " "- \ / \ " .> \ " /' ./ ) "- / / "- / / /' /-Z. > /' /' '- / , /' '- j"", '- ~ /< ,/ "- I , / 'v " '" '" "- / '" , y '" , / '" "- " \ ';--. " \- / " , , "- "- v < / / / / / " I , '- I '- / '- '- / / ''''y ~--.-J OWN BY: DATE: /0/2095 '+. A " I'. \ , ~..\\ EXHIBIT "A" \.--- ;- , '>-.. c.. r---,,.. f. I r ",> " / "- .i FILE NO.LY,08~-1/ SEWc~ CtJNN&CT10f:! AT 4017 PALJ4 OR. J~ -: ..:;7/2.-c6 Recording requested by and please return to: City Clerk City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 91912 .It. This space for Recorder's use, only ... Assessors Parcel No's. 593-111-03-00 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CIruLA VISTA AND FRANCISCO JAVIER MARES & MAl TUYET DO REGARDING SEWER SERVICE AND ANNEXATION This agreement is hereby made this day of , 19_, for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed by the parties, between FRANCISCO JAVIER MARES and MAl TUYET DO hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner") and the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter referred to as "City"). City and Owner are sometimes hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties." REcrT ALS A. Property and Ownership. Owner is the owner of property commonly known as 4017 PALM DRIVE and identified by the San Diego County Tax Assessor as the tax assessor parcel number shown in the upper left hand corner of this page, the legal description of which is more fully set forth on Exhibit" A" ("Property") in the unincorporated territory adjacent or proximal to the City boundary in part of an area which could logically and reasonably be annexed to the City. B. Request for Connection to Sewer System. Owner has submitted a request to the City Engineer for permission to connect to City's sewer system. A copy of the plans and specifications and accompanying maps designating the connection ("Proposed Connection") has been submitted to City's City Engineer. C. No Duty to Serve. Owner acknowledges that City is under no duty to serve the Owner's property with sewer service because it is outside the jurisdictional responsibility of City. D. Willingness to Serve on Conditions. City is willing to serve Owner's property with sewer service on the condition that a concerted good faith effort is made to annex the Property to the City at such time as City directs, pursuant to City's Council Policy No. 570-02, adopted June 2, 1992. E. Owner's understanding. Policy No. 570-02 has been read and understood by Owner. Page 1/.2--7 COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises, the Parties agree as follows: B This box is to be initialed by the parties if Section A, Annexation Agreement applies. If it is initialed, Owner and City will be bound by the provisions of Section A and Section C; and if the annexation attempt fails, by Section Band Section C. If it is not initialed, the parties will be bound by the provisions of Section Band C without being bound by the provisions of Section A. Section A. 1. First Annex Agreement under Section 1 of Policy. 1.1 Annexation Petition and Application. Owner agrees to forthwith file the formal petition for annexation of the Property to the City ("Petition for Annexation" or "Petition") and an application for annexation ("Application for Annexation" or "Application") of the Property to City with the LAFCO, a copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibit "B" and Exhibit "C", and the originals of which is on file with LAFCO. Owner agrees to diligently and in good faith prosecute both Petition and Application to completion with the goal of obtaining the annexation of the Property to the City. 1.2 Application for Prezoning. Owner understands that as a condition to annexation, Owner must apply to the City to have the Property pre-zoned ("Application for Prezone"), a discretionary act which will require a certain amount of environmental review. Owner agrees to forthwith file a formal application for prezoning with the City ("Prezone Application"), complete an application for an initial study, and comply with all other rules and regulations of the City. Owner agrees to diligently and in good faith prosecute the Application for Prezone to completion with the goal of prezoning the Property. 1.3 Immediate Effort Deposit Owner agrees to pay Six Thousand Six Hundred Sixty dollars, United States currency, ($6,660.00) to City as a deposit to secure Owner's performance in good faith and with best efforts under this agreement ("Immediate Effort Deposit"). Such deposit will be held by City until after annexation is complete. After annexation is completed, the City shall refund such Immediate Effort Deposit with such interest as the City Finance Director determines as the average interest earnings of similarly situated City funds during the relevant time period. If the annexation effort fails, the Immediate Effort Deposit shall be handled under the provision of Section 1.5 ("Failure of Annexation Petition and/or Application"). Page 2 J')_~ 1.4 Authority to Connect. Owner may proceed with construction necessary to implement the Proposed Connection upon the filing of the Petition, Application, and Prezone Application and payment of fees and Immediate Effort Deposit required by this Subsection, and the aforementioned provisions of this Agreement. 1.4.1 Owner agrees to construct the Proposed Connection to City's sewer system in conformance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City laws and regulations, including, without limitation, building and health and safety codes. 1.4.2 No construction of the Proposed Connection and related improvements shall be undertaken without the written approval of the City's City Engineer and a plumbing permit from the agency in whose jurisdiction the Property is located, and a permit from the Agency owning the right-of-way in which the sewer main in located. 1.4.3 No sewer service shall be provided to any property beyond the City's boundary until written approval of that specific service has been received by the City's City Engineer from the City of San Diego pursuant to the terms of the Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960. 1.5 Failure of Annexation Petition and/or Application. In the event annexation is not approved, unreasonably delayed by the Owner, or otherwise fails, (a) the Immediate Effort Deposit, and all interest earned thereon, will be retained by the City for any purpose whatsoever, and shall be transferred into the City's general fund to offset any administrative, overhead, or other costs the City incurs as a result of providing the municipal service outside the City's boundary and the loss of general fund revenues to the City caused by the property being outside the City boundaries; (b) the Parties shall be bound by each and every provision of Section B; and, (c) if the City determines that the annexation failed or was unreasonably delayed because the Owners failed to exercise good faith and best efforts to cause or assist in permitting the annexation to occur, any connection to the City's sewer system permitted or authorized by this Agreement may be disconnected at the sole option of City and upon reasonable notice to the Owners to provide for alternate sewer service. Page 3 /c2~1 This Section B and the following Section C will apply if either the box at the beginning of Section A is not initialed, or it has been initialed and the annexation attempt required under Section A has failed. In such case, the parties will be bound by the provisions of Section Band Section C. Section B. This Section B applies if, for either of two reasons, the Property has not been annexed to the City's territory: (I) either the annexation effort required by Section A failed despite the City's initial opinion that it was feasible, or (2) an annexation effort was not initially required, but due to subsequent development, the City believes that an annexation effort has become feasible and appropriate. Section B permits immediate connection to our City sewer system, but obligates the Owner to try to achieve annexation at such time, and from time to time, as the City deems the annexation will be feasible. 2. Annexation and Disconnect Agreement. 2.1 Delayed Annexation Deposit. Upon execution, Owner agrees to pay City Eight Thousand Nine Hundred Forty dollars, United States currency, ($8,940.00), representing twice the current sewer capacity charge, plus one-half of fees charged for annexation by: a) LAFCO, b) the State Board of Equalization and c) the City of Chula Vista, in accordance with Section 2 of Policy 570-02, as a deposit to secure Owner's performance under this agreement ("Delayed Annexation Deposit") and will be disposed of in the manner herein in this Section B provided. 2.2 Authority to Connect. Construction to implement the Proposed Connection may proceed upon execution of this agreement by the City and receipt of Delayed Annexation Deposit by the City according to the provisions of this Agreement. 2.2. I Owner agrees to construct the Proposed Connection to City's sewer system in conformance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City laws and regulations, including, without limitation, building and health and safety codes. 2.2.2 No construction of the Proposed Connection and related improvements shall be undertaken without the written approval of the City's City Engineer and a plumbing permit from the agency in whose jurisdiction the Property is located, and a permit from the Agency owning the right-of-way in which the sewer main in located. Page 4 /;2 ~ / c:J 2.2.3 No sewer service shall be provided to any property beyond the City's boundary until written approval of that specific service has been received by the City's City Engineer from the City of San Diego pursuant to the terms of the Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960. 2.3 Annexation Petition and Application. At such time as the City determines that annexation of the Property is logical and likely to succeed, City shall so notify Owner, and upon such notification, Owner, including his successors and assigns, agrees, as a covenant running with the land, to forthwith file a formal petition for annexation ("Petition") and an annexation application ("Application") with LAFCO for the annexation of the Property to the City at such time as the City shall direct. Upon such notification, Owner agrees to diligently and in good faith prosecute both Petition and Application to completion with the goal of obtaining the annexation of the Property to the City. 2.3.1 LAFCO Filing Fees; Application of Portion of Delayed Annexation Deposit. Owner shall be responsible, at his sole cost, for all LAFCO filing fees; however, City agrees to use and apply that portion of the Deferred Annexation Deposit charged initially for the LAFCO filing fees for the Petition and Application towards Owners charges for LAFCO filing fees. 2.4 Application for Prezoning. Owner understands that as a condition to annexation, Owner must apply to the City to have the Property pre-zoned (" Application for Prezone"), a discretionary act which will require a certain amount of environmental review. At such time as the City may require the filing of an Application and Petition, Owner agrees to file a formal application for prezoning with the City ("Prezone Application"), complete an application for an initial study, and comply with all other rules and regulations of the City. Owner agrees to diligently and in good faith prosecute the Application for Prezone to completion with the goal of prezoning the Property. 2.4.1 City Filing Fees; Application of Portion of Deferred Annexation Deposit. Owner shall be responsible, at his sole cost, for all City imposed fees; however, City agrees to use and apply that portion of the Deferred Annexation Deposit charged initially for such City fees towards Owners payment of such charges. Page 5 J c2 - J / 2.5 Disconnection. Any connection to the City's sewer system permitted or authorized by this Agreement may be disconnected at the sole option of City in the event that the Property is not annexed to the City as a result of the annexation procedure herein provided, and the City determines that the Owners failed to exercise good faith to cause or assist in permitting the annexation to occur. 2.6 City Use of Funds Except for that portion of the Delayed Annexation Deposit charged initially for the LAFCO filing fees for the Petition and Application towards Owners charges for LAFCO filing fees, the Delayed Annexation Deposit will be retained by the City for any purpose whatsoever, and shall be transferred into the City's general fund to offset any administrative, overhead, or other costs the City incurs as a result of providing the municipal service outside the City's boundary and the loss of general fund revenues to the City caused by the property being outside the City boundaries; Section C. General Provisions 3. General Provisions Applicable with Either Section A or B, or both. The following provisions are considered general in nature and are equally applicable regardless of whether Section A applies in the first instance, or whether Section B applies in the first instance. 3.1 Agreement and Covenants Run with the Land. The burden of the covenants herein contained to be performed by the Owners are for the benefit of interests in land owned by the City including interests in sewer easements and public rights of way that are adjacent and proximal to the Property. The burden of such covenants touch and concern the Property. It is the intent of the parties, and the parties hereby agree, that these covenants shall be binding upon both the current Property Owners, and upon all successors, heir, transferees and assigns of the Property Owners, and run with the ownership of the land which it burdens. 3.2 Remedy Among such other remedies as are available to the Parties, this Agreement shall be specifically enforceable by the Parties. 3.3 Construction of Sewer Connection. At such time as construction of the Proposed Connection is permitted to proceed under the terms of this agreement, the following applies: Page 6).:2 j.2... 3.3.1 Owner agrees to construct the Proposed Connection to City's sewer system in conformance with all applicable Federal, State, County, and City laws and regulations, including, without limitation, building and health and safety codes. 3.3.2 No construction of the Proposed Connection and related improvements shall be undertaken without the written approval of the City's City Engineer and a plumbing permit from the agency in whose jurisdiction the Property is located, and a permit from the Agency owning the right-of-way in which the sewer main in located. 3.3.3 No sewer service shall be provided to any property beyond the City's boundary until written approval of that specific service has been received by the City's City Engineer from the City of San Diego pursuant to the terms of the Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960. 3.4 Payment of Costs. 3.4.1 Owner agrees to pay all costs associated with complying with any or all Federal, State, County, or City laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the cost of obtaining any permits and certificates. Owner further agrees to pay any and all fines imposed by any governmental entity for any reason. 3.4.2 Any and all costs associated with the construction and attachment to City's sewer system for the Proposed Connection and related construction and/or improvements shall be borne solely by Owner. 3.4.3 Any connection to the City's sewer system may be disconnected at the sole option of City. If a connection is disconnected for any reason, Owner agrees to pay the full cost for such disconnection and to bear the full cost of any damages and injuries resulting from such disconnection. 3.5 Payment of Charges. At and during such time that the Property is connected to the City's sewer system, Owner agrees to pay any and all current and future charges related to the connection to City's sewer system including, without limitation, a sewer capacity fee of $2,220.00, in addition to any non-capacity charges which may be imposed. 3.6 Dedication. Owner agrees to dedicate to the City a sewer easement to the extent that the Proposed Connection requires extending the sewer main onto Owners Property. Page 7 J;2... ~/J 3.7 Future Connections and Annexations. 3.7.1 Owner agrees not to oppose, or file a written or oral protest petition, or otherwise protest any existing or future connections into the sewer lateral or the City's sewer system for any other adjacent property. 3.7.2 Owner agrees not to oppose, or file a written or oral protest petition, or otherwise protest any current or future procedures to annex their property or any other adjacent property at the Conducting Authority level of annexation proceedings. Nothing herein shall affect the right of the Owner to vote in any annexation election that may be called. 3.8 Indemnity. Owner indemnifies and holds harmless City from any and all liability, claims, costs (including reasonable attorneys' fees), damages, expenses and causes of action resulting from any construction performed under or otherwise related to performance of this Agreement. 3.9 Future Sewer Service Upon connection to the City's sanitary sewer system, Owner agrees to accept service from City subject to any appropriate ongoing City sewer service charges and/or sewage pumping charges. 3.10 Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended by the written consent of all of the Parties at the time of such amendment. 3.11 Attorneys' Fees. If either Party commences an action against the other Party arising out of or in connection with this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to have and recover from the losing Party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs of suit, and if the City is awarded such attorneys' fees and costs, such award shall constitute a lien upon the Property. 3.12 Authority. City and Owner represent that the individuals signing this Agreement have full right and authority to bind their respective Parties to this Agreement. Page 8 );2. _/'/ 3.13 Best Efforts And Cooperation. The Parties promise to use their best efforts to satisfy all conditions to this Agreement and to take all further steps and execute all further documents reasonably necessary to put this Agreement into effect. 3.14 Binding Effect Of Agreement. It is the intent of the Parties that this Agreement, in addition to constituting a binding agreement "running with the land" shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the respective Parties and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. A copy of this Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the County Recorder upon execution. 3.15 Captions And Headings. The captions and headings in this Agreement are solely for purposes of convenience, are not part of this Agreement, and may not be used to interpret this Agreement. 3.16 Construction. Whenever used herein, the singular number shall include the plural, the plural number shall include the singular, and the masculine, feminine or neuter gender shall include the others whenever the context so indicates. 3.17 Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes any prior agreement and contains the entire agreement of the Parties on the matters covered. No other agreement, statement or promise made by any Party or by any employee, officer or agent of any Party that is not in writing and signed by all Parties shall be binding. 3.18 Exhibits. All exhibits to which reference is made are deemed incorporated in this Agreement, whether or not actually attached. 3.19 Further Assurances. Each party hereto agrees to perform any further acts and to execute and deliver any further documents which may be reasonably necessary to carry out the provisions of this Agreement. Page 9 /' /,;L-/~ 3.20 Governing Law. This Agreement has been executed in and shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. 3.21 Invalidity. If any term, covenant, condition or provision of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. 3.22 No Strict Construction. This Agreement shall not be strictly construed against any party hereto. 3.23 Notices. All notices and demands shall be given in writing by personal delivery or first-class mail, postage prepaid. Notices shall be addressed as appears below for the respective Party; provided that, if any Party gives notice of a change of name or address, notices to the giver of that notice shall thereafter be given as demanded in that notice. Notices shall be deemed received seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail. ~ City of Chula Vista City Engineer 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 ~ Francisco Javier Mares Mai Tuyet Do 776 Bush Street #311 San Francisco, CA 94108 3.23.1 Sole Agreement. This Agreement contains the sole and entire agreement between the Parties and can be modified or amended only in writing. This Agreement supersedes and takes the place of all other agreements, oral or written, between the Parties, and neither Party is relying upon any representations or promises not expressly contained herein. Page 10 /;2 - / t? 3.23.2 Waivers. The waiver by one Party of the performance of any covenant, condition or promise shall not invalidate this Agreement, nor shall it be considered a waiver by him of any other covenant, condition or promise. The waiver by either or both Parties of the time for performing any act shall not constitute a waiver of the time for performing any other act or an identical act required to be performed at a later time. The exercise of any remedy provided in this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any consistent remedy provided by law, and any provision of this Agreement for any remedy shall not exclude other consistent remedies unless they are expressly excluded. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed the day and year first hereinabove set forth. (End of page. Next is signature page.) Page ll/;Z _ ) 7/11. -18 CITY OF CHULA VISTA DATED: BY: 61:- M fv Ior*,', ftw8.rf!.A/I/3/o/;ts: Mayor e Lt~ L --h A t-k >t-: PROPERTY OWNER(S) DATED: 1/. ~. q ~ JM I~ ~W<, / DATED: Il-~-q~ - ---- ~ - '" (A_ 00,,", jOOWlw,m"r "'MOO"".) 1^ NOTES: a. Each owner as reflected on the preliminary title report must sign. b. Permittee is to submit a check or money order payable to County of San Diego in the amount of $43.00 for recordation of this agreement. c. Exhibits are as follows: Exhibit A is the legal description. , Page 12 /,;L~// LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR PROPERTY TO BE SERVED BY CIruLA VISTA SEWER That portion of the easte,ly half of Quarter Section 46 of Rancho de la Nacion, in the County of San Diego, State of California, according tc' ~.L:p thereof No. 166, made by Morrill, filed in the County Recorder's office of said San Diego County, May 11, 1869, and more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the most southerly corner of Lot 56 in Block "B" of Bonita Hills, Unit No.1, according to Map thereof No. 2139, filed in the County Recorder's office of San Diego County, November 22, 1928, said corner being also the most easterly corner of land described under Parcel I in the deed to Margaret H. Wilms and Joseph H. Wilms, recorded March 2, 1965, as File No. 36594; thence along the southeasterly line of said Wilms' land, South 320 54' 00 " West, 92.00 feet to the most easterly corner of land described under Parcel I in deed to Edward H. Crane, recorded May 2, 1960, as File No. 90452 and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the boundary of said Crane's land as follows: Continuing South 320 54' 00" West, 100.00 feet to the most southerly corner of said land; thence North 63001' 00" West, 407.00 feet, more or less, to the westerly boundary of land described under Parcel I in deed to J.M. Burkhart, et UX, recorded April 11, 1960, as File No. 74151; thence northerly along said westerly boundary to the most northerly corner of said Crane's land, being a point on a line which bears North 630 01' 00" West from the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along the northeasterly line of said Crane's land South 63001' 00" East, 470.00 feet, more or less to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. EXHIBIT "A" ) c2 ~ ;v:;J COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /3 Meeting Date 11/9/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution ) 7.3 tJ J Approving agreement with GCF Laundry of Chula Vista and Colrich Investments, Ltd for the deferral of payment of a portion of appropriate sewer capacity fees. DicIT<" or MHo w""'1 ~ City Manager~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.10 SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: On April 20, 1993 the City Council received a letter from the National Properties Group in which it was requested that they be allowed to pay sewer capacity fees of approximately $60,000 for a proposed laundromat over a period of ten years. Council referred the issue to staff to work with the developer in an etIort to allow the project to proceed. The laundromat is a high consumer of water, and consequently generates a large quantity of sewage. However, it generates a very low income with respect to the required Sewer Capacity Fee. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve the resolution approving agreement for the deferral of payment of a portion of appropriate sewer capacity fees BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable DISCUSSION: The Municipal Code provides, in Section 13.14.090, that the owner or person making application for a permit to develop or modify the use of property shall pay a Sewer Capacity Charge. That charge is set forth in the Master Schedule of Fees to be $2,220 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit - a measure which relates the amount of wastewater flowing from any premises to the amount of wastewater from a typical single family home. Staff has consistently interpreted this provision of the Code to mean that an applicant was required to make this payment in full before a permit could be issued. In the instance of the proposed laundromat, the final flow of wastewater calculated from the revised plans for the tenant improvements amounts to 24.50 EDU's. The commercial space to be occupied by the laundromat was originally charged for 2.2 EDU's when the building was constructed, so a remainder of 22.30 EDU's is left to be paid for by the laundromat. This amounts to a total of $49,506. The sum of $60,000 mentioned in the original letter to Council has been lessened by virtue of a reduction in the number of machines to be installed. As noted above, the Sewer Capacity Fee has been tied to the acceptance of an application for building permit. Until the fee was paid, the application was not considered complete. No building permits requiring the payment of this fee have yet been issued in the absence of such payment. This has largely been a matter of practicality based on the difficulty of stopping a use of property once it has been permitted to start. /3-/ Page 2, Item /3 Meeting Date: 11/9/93 In the present situation we have investigated the normal requirements for a deferral - bond or letter of credit and a lien on the property. Staff is advised that a bond is not possible because the insurer would require the placement of a deposit in the same amount as the bond. This would negate any value that placing a bond would have in the first place. A lien on the property is not practical because the developer, Colrich Investments, Ltd is a lessee of the property for a term of 75 years and the laundromat (GCF Laundry of Chula Vista) will be a sublessee. The proposed agreement negotiated by the City Attorney's office, provides for the payment of $2,812.95 of the total Sewer Capacity Fee of $49,506 at the issuance of a building permit for the tenant improvements and the remaining amount including 5 % interest per year in quarterly payments starting January 1, 1994 until the whole amount is paid. The last payment is due on July 1, 1998. The agreement allows the entire remaining balance of the fee to be paid at any time without penalty. Payment obligations under the proposed agreement is evidenced by a promissory note signed by GCF Laundry and which is secured by a pledge by GCF Laundry of its inventory and equipment. This promissory is guaranteed by Colrich Investments, Ltd (the entity name of National Properties, Inc. involved in this issue), the landlord of Sonunerset Plaza; this guarantee is secured by a pledge by Colrich of its rental income under the GCF Laundry lease. The payment of sewer service charges is not a part of this agreement. Based on a comparison with other laundromats of similar size it is estimated that sewer service charges could be $600 to $1,100 per month. Staff's recommendation for approval of the agreement in this specific case is based on the following facts and circumstances: (a) The difficult economic climate, especially for small businesses, (b) The size of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee relative to the size of its commercial enterprise, (c) The services that will be provided by the GCF Laundromat to the surrounding moderate and low income communities, (d) the adequate assurance of payment of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee provided by GCF and its landlord, and (e) the current sufficiency of the City's Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund (Fund 222) to provide for trunk sewer or capacity upgrades over the time period during which the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee is required to be paid. The City Attorney's office concurs in this recommendation and has determined that it will not contlict with the requirements of the Municipal Code. It should be noted that, as indicated above, the approval of this agreement will mark the departure of this City from its normal requirement that capacity fees be paid in full before a permit allowing the use of commercial property is issued. It is not intended that this should be considered a change in City policy, but rather an instance of dealing with a unique set of circumstances . JJ~~ Page 3, Item J J Meeting Date: 11/9/93 If the agreement is approved as recommended by staff, we will return to Council with a proposed Council policy dealing with the delayed payment of Sewer Capacity Fees in order to discourage a plethora of similar requests. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement provides for the delayed availability of funds for trunk sewer upgrade work. However, it is not anticipated that this delayed availability will cause the delay of needed construction or capacity acquisition. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement RLD:PA-002 F:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\IAUNDMAT ) J -- J /1.3 - 'f RESOLUTION NO. /73t?3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH GCF LAUNDRY OF CHULA VISTA AND COLRICH INVEST- MENTS, LTD. FOR THE DEFERRAL OF PAYMENT OF A PORTION OF APPROPRIATE SEWER CAPACITY FEES WHEREAS, on April 20, 1993, the City Council received a letter from the National Properties Group on behalf of GCF Laundry of Chula vista and Colrich Investments, Ltd. in which it was requested that they be allowed to defer payment of a sewer capacity fee for a proposed laundromat in the Sommerst Plaza Shopping Center over a period of years; and WHEREAS, the City Council instructed staff to work with National Properties Group to determine the validity of such request and to negotiate possible terms and conditions for such deferral, if appropriate; and WHEREAS, city staff has evaluated the proposed deferral and negotiated terms for such deferral in light of the following facts and circumstances: (a) the difficult economic climate, particularly for small businesses, (b) the size of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee relative to the size of its commercial enterprise, (c) the services that will be provided by the GCF laundromat to the surrounding moderate and low income communities, (d) the adequate assurance for payment of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee provided by GCF and its landlord, and (e) the current sufficiency of the City's Improvements Fund to provide for sewer trunk over the time period during which the GCF Sewer Fee is required to be paid. Capital upgrades Capacity WHEREAS, the deferral of such fee may be permitted in accordance with sewer capacity fee provisions of Chula vista Municipal Code section 13 .14.090 and the waiving authority set forth in Code section 3.45.010. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED in light of the above facts and circumstances and pursuant to the above described authority that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an Agreement with GCF Laundry of Chula Vista and Colrich Investments, Ltd. for the deferral of payment of a portion of appropriate sewer capacity fees, and related agreements, copies of which are on file in the office of the city Clerk. /3-/ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement, and any related agreements, for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works C:\r\colrich as ~orm ruce M. Boogaard, Attorney /:]/t? VVJ iC-\J v..J In.! !..J'!U vJ.' I v~ VUU""j, . !uJII I Hj~ !IV. '''U.....J U lU'1 I, vv AGREEMBNT :rOR DEFERRAL of SEWER CAPACITY FEE [1655 BROADWAY, SUITE 8, CKULA VISTA] THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day ot , 1993, by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a munioipal corpora.tion, ("city"), and COLRICH INVESTMENTS, LTD., L.P., a California limited partnership, ("Colrich") a.nd GCF Laundry of Chula vista, Inc., a california corporation ("GCP") with reference to the following faots: 1n:'l'HESSE'l'K WHEREAS, Sommer set Plaza, a California general partnership ("Sommerset") ground leased certain real property (the "project Property") commonly known as 1655-1665 Broadway, Chula vista, California 91911 (Assessor's Parcel No. 622-111-50-09) from Northern Trust of california; WHEREAS, Sommerset has developed a commercial center on the Project Property commonly known as Sommerset Plaza; WHEREAS, on March 11, 1993, Colrich succeeded to sommer set t 5 interest in the Project Property and the sommerset Plaza development WHEREAS, Colrich wishes to sublease to GCF an approximately 2,408 square foot portion of the project Property commonly known as Suite B (the "GCF property") for use as a laundromat; ,\ WHEREAS, as a condition of obtaining a building permit from City tor the necessary improvements to the GCF Property (the "GCF Improvements"), pursuant to Chula vista Municipal Code section 13.14.090, the applicant must pay a sewer capacity fee of $2,220 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) of additional flow qenerated by the proposed use for the GCF Property; WHEREAS, in accordance with the city's Master Fee Schedule, the additional number of EDU's for GCF's operation of the laundromat at the GCF Property has been calculated by City to be 22.30, corresponding to a Sewer capacity Fee of $49,506.00 (the "GCF Sewer Capacity Fee"); 1 /3 ~-? UVI-~~-~J r~j jJ.jO vi J I ur '-'nUi.n Y h>J11 rni\ !'tv, "tc...J UIU'i J, VI WHEREAS, in light of the large size of this fee relative to the small amount or revenue likely to be generated by the GCF laundromat, Colrich and GCF wish to defer payment of a portion of this fee; and WHEREAS, in this specitic case, City is willing to defer payment of a portion of this fee on the terms and conditions set forth herein in light of the following facts and circumstances: (a) the difficult economic climate, particularly for small businesses, (b) the size of the CCF Sewer Capacity Fee relative to the size of its commercial enterprise, (c) the services that will be provided by the GCF laundromat to the surrounding moderate and low income communities, (d) the adequate assurance for payment of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee provided bY GCl" and its landlord, and (e) the current sufficiency of the City's Capital Improvements Fund to provide for sewer trunk upgrades over the time period during which the GCF Sewer capacity Fee is required to be paid. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGRE~D by and between the parties hereto as follows: 1. Terms of PaYment: a. GCF agrees to pay the GCl" sewer Capacity Fee with interest, ,"ccruing at the rate of five percent (5%) per annum in accordance with the following payment schedule: (i) Prior to issuance of the Building Permit for the GCF Improvements, GCF shall pay.the city the amount of Two Thousand Ei~ht Hundred Twelve Dollars and Ninety Five Cents ($2,812.95), ~ an amount constituting prepaid interest at the rate of 5\ per annum accruing on the outlltandin~ balance of the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee for the period commencing with the date of this payment and ending upon the date the first quarterly payment (as provided below) is due. 2 /J~r U\jT-~lJ-lJj r!{1 Ij: IlJ ~lJY Ur ~HULH VI~IH tHII NU. 4co blb4 r.Ub (ii) On January 1, 1994 and quarterly thereafter (e.g. every January 1st, ADril 1st, ~ 1st and Octoher l~t) until the outstanding GCF Sewer capacity Fee balance is paid, GCF shall pay the City instal~ents in the amount of TWO Thousand Eight Hundred Twelve Dollars and Ninety Five Cents ($2,812.95). GCF's obligation to make such payments shall be evidenced by a seoured Promissory Note ("Note") executed by GCF in favor of the City in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. GCF shall execute and deliver the Note to City concurrently with its execution of this Agreement. GCF or Colrich may prepay the outstanding balance under the Note at any time without penalty. Upon full repayment, Colrich's and GCY'S Obligations hereunder, under the Note and under the Guaranty shall terminate. In order to secure GCF's obligations under the Note, GCF hereby pledges, grants, assigns and sets over to the city a seourity interst, pureuant to Division 9 of tha Uniform Commercial Code, as adopted in California, in oertain personal property described on Exhibit B attached bereto and incorporated herein by this reference. GCF agrees to perform such further acts and to execute and deliver such additional documents as may be reasonably required in order to perfect City's seourity interest in such property and to otherwise carry out the provisions of this Agreement. b. Colrich agrees to guarantee GCf's obligations hereunder and under the Note. In order to evidence this guaranty, Colrich (sometimes referred to hereunderl as "Guarantor") shall eXecute, . and deliver to the City concurrently with its execution Of . this Agreement the form of Guaranty attached hereto as Exhibit ~ (the "Guaranty"). Colrich's guaranty obligations shall be ,seoured by the assignment by Colrich of a security interest in colrich's right to rent under the terms of the GCF Lease, and an assignment of any and all other security interests obtained by Colrich in GCF's assets, all as further provided in the Guaranty. c. All fees required by the Master Fee sohedule other than the Sewer Capacity Fee, including but not limited to the Sewer Administration Fee and the Montgomery area sewer service charge for the remaining portion of FY 1993-94, shall be due and payable at the time the Building Permit is obtained. The Montgomery Area sewer service charge for later years shall be charged as an item on the annual property tax bill for the 3 /3---( U~I-~~-~J rKI IJ'I~ vIII ur vnULn il~ln rn/\ nu. 'iC:\J ViO'i f,Uv Project Property or by whatever method is used in the future to bill for wastewater discharges in the Montgomery area. d. The GCF Property will not be certified for occupancy until this Agreement is fully executed and the initial payments due hereunder are paid or the total amount of currently due fees are paid. 2. A..iqnment and Transfers. a. Neither Colrich nor GCF may assign its obligations or rights hereunder without City's prior written consent to be exercised in City's sole discretion. Any attempted assignment in violation of this section shall be void and shall constitute a material default hereunder. b. Should all or any portion of Co1rich's interest in the Project Property or GCF'S interest in the GCF Property be transferred before the GCF Sewer Capacity Fee is paid in full, GCF and Colrich shall remain liable as the Maker under the Note and the Guarantor under the Guaranty, respectively. Notwi th- standing the foregoing, Colrich and/or GCF may apply for relief of their respecti VB obligations hereunder upon the transfer of the Project Property or the GCF Property. The City shall evaluate such proposals based on the ability of the proposed transferee(s) to assume the obligations under this Agreement and related agreement,s. The City's approval of any such transfer of obligations hereunder shall be exercised in its sole discretion. 3 . Remedies. In o~er to enforce GCF'S an Co1rich'. obligations under the terms of this Agreement, the Note or the Guaranty, the City shall be entitled to pursue any and all remedies provided at law or in equity, including, without limitation, any and all remedies provided under the Note, the Guaranty and all ancillary agreements referred to therein. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, in the event of a default by Gct of its obligations hereunder, the City shall have the right to withdraw all business or other permits issued by the City permitting the operation by GCP of its business at the GCF Property or elsewhere in the City. 4 /J~JtJ VI.d-"'" \J~ i'1\.! hJ'(..U V!.Il VI VUU1..H '!tJJII I UH jlV. '.U...V V!U"'1 .I, .I..... 4. Miscellaneous provisions: A. Authoritv: Colrich and GCF represent And warrant that they have full power and authority to enter into this Aqreement b. ~otices: Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or by law, any and all notices required or permitted by this Agreement or by law to be served on or delivered to either party shall be in writinq and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed, or in lieu thereof, when three (3) business days have elapsed following deposit in the U.S. mail, certif ied, or registered mail, return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to the address indicated in the Agreement. A party may change such Address for purpose of this paragraph by giving notice of such change to the other party. Facsimile transmission shall constitute personal delivery. city: city of Chula Vista 276 4th Avenue Chula vista, CA 91910 Attn: City Attorney's Offioe GCF: Colrich Investments, Ltd. 2665 Ariane Driv~, suit. 207 San Diego, CA 92117 Attn: Richard Gabriel , I ~ (4f7! 1655 Broadway, Suite 8 ~ t~h ~lA'~ Chub, Vista, Ca. 91911 (x:>o i!:f1.41,;4rJG'U..L..J.I.-2crz.. Attn: Scott Ryan fj,.J.,.,.J./ 72..~.1 7( rr-' ~ ~ q~z-'Tl (A party 1I1ay change Eluch address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice of 5uch change to the other party in the manner provided in this paragraph. Facsimile transmission Elhall oonstitute personal delivery.) Colrich: c. captions: captions in this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference and do not define, describe or limit the scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms. d. Entire Aareement: This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter 5 J:J~// VV.I L...... ....u I ~\" "U'~V Vt'l ..n ,",UVI.ooU ~ U...U1 1.1011 .1....' ~........ ~1...,-1 hereof. Any prior oral agreements, understandings, force and effect. or written representations, and/or 5tatements shall be of no e. PreDaration of Aareement: No inference, assumption or presumption shall be drawn from the fact that a party or his attorney prepared and/or drafted this A9ree~ent. It shall be conclusively presumed that both parties participated equally in the preparation and/or drafting of this Agreement. f. Recitals: Exhibits: Any recitals set forth are incorporated by reference into this Agreement. g. Attorneys' Fees: The prevailing party in any action enforcing the provisions of this agreement shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs in addition to any other costs, damages, or remedies. h. Governinq Law: The Agreement has been executed in California and shall be governed by the laws of the state of California. 1. Invaliditv: If any term, covenant or provisions of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions hereof shall remain in full force and effect and shall in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated thereby. . j. Time: Time is of the essence in the performance of the Parties' obligations contained ?erein. , k. Waivers: The waiver by one Party of the performance of any covenant, condition or promise shall not invalidate this ~greement, nor shall it be considered a waiver by him of any other covenant, condition or promise. The waiver by either or both Parties of the time for performing any other act or identical act required to be performed at a later time. The exercise of any remedy provided in this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any consistent remedy provided by law, and any provision of this Agreement for any remedy shall not exclude other consistent remedies unless they are expressly e~cluded. 1. Further Assurances 1 The Parties agree to perform such further act. and to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments as may be reasonably required in order to carry out the provisions of this Agreement, or any of the agreements IS /J~/2 Vv1-C"-v.,) n\l J.v,c::.J. v111 ur vllULlI -rJ.JJJII I'Jln J'iU. '1,-,,) U1U'1 1, J.'- or documents referred to herein, and the intentions of the Parties. m. Successors: Subject to the restrictions on assignment contained herein, all terms Of this agreement shall be binding upon and be enforceable by the Parties hereto and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns. [Next Page Is Signature pageJ .I 7 /3 '/;5 ~J-'~-~J r~j jJ;,j vIII Ur vMULH Vj~IH rH^ I~U, 't,~ 010't [, IJ SIGNATURE nGE 'l'O AGREEXENT "OR DEFERRAL OF SEWER CAPACITY FEB IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, Colrioh and. GCl" have executed this Agreement effective as of the date first set forth above there))y indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: CITY OF CHULA VISTA GCl" LAUNDRY OF CHt1LA VISTA, rNC. a California corporation By: TIM NADER, MAYOR ~ ' By: ~~ d-~~_~ Title: /1.1-1 ~/ Attested bYI BEVERLY AUTHELET, CITY CLERK COLRICH INVESTMENTS, LTD., L.P., a California limited. partnerShip t~A 3 By: Colrich Developments, Inc., a California corporatioll1 ~' ~,/ //7. " : / . ..:~:<~ By' Tit a: /?~/J Appr ad BRUCE M. BOOGAARD, CI TTORNEY .I C!\u\MIri~ .B. /J~/t( j/.1-15 lft, I-t'(i-~;\ rKJ j;\.IO viii ur vnULN ~j~IN r Nh I1U. ~<::;) U 10~ r, u," SECURED PROMISSORY NOTE $49,506 Chula vista, CA , 1993 This Secured Promissory Note ("Note") is executed pursuant to the A9reement tor Deteral ot Sewer Capacity Fee (the "Agreement") dated as of , 1993, between GCF Laundry of Chula Vista, Inc., a California corporation ("Debtor") and the City of Chula vista, a municipal corporation ("City"). (capitalhed terms used herein and not otherwise defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement). 1. For value received, Debtor promises to pay to City, or order, the principal sum of FORTY NINE THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED AND SIX DOLLARS ($49,506), together with interest on the prinoipal balance from 'time to time remaining unpaid from the date ot disbur.ement until paid at the rate of five (5) peroent per annum. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360 day year and actual days elapsed, and shall be compounded quarterly. 2. Payment of principal and interest under this Note shall be due and payable as follows: WWi AMOUNT DUE (a) Prior to issuance of the Building Permit for the GCF Improvements $2,812.95 plus interest at the rate of 5% per annun on the outstanding balance of the GCF Sewer capacity Fee for the period commencing with the date ot this payment and ending upon the date the first quarterly payment is due. $2,812.95 ,1 (11) January 1, 1994 and quarterly thereafter (e.g. every January 1st, A~ril 1st, ~ 1st and October 1st) until the outstanding GCF Sewer Capacity Fee balance is paid. 3. Any outstanding balance hereunder shall be fully due and payable upon A~ril 1, 1998. All payments on this Note shall be applied first to the payment of acorued but unpaid interest, and after all such interest has been paid, any remainder shall be applied to reduction of the principal balance. This Note may be 1 J3~/? VVI ~V VV I H..I. .l.v'.l.V V.I. ~ 1 VI ...........1.0.10 _ .l.ioI~1I . HI. ..v. ......... ....1.1.1"1. .. V.... prepaid at any time without penalty to the Debtor. \ 4. The occurrence of anyone or ~ore of the following events ahall constitute an "Event of Defelult"; (a) default under any aqraement or other writing executed in favor of City in connection with this Note, including but not limited to the Agreement or the Guaranty; (b) default in the payment when due of any installment or amount of principal or interest due on this Note; (c) the makinq by Debtor of any assignment for the benefit of creditors or the voluntary appointment (at the request or with thG consent of Debtor) of a receiver, custodian, liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy of any of Debtor's property, or the filing by Debtor of a petition in bankruptcy or other similar proceeding under any law for relief of debtors; (d) the filinq against Debtor ot a petition 1n bankruptcy or other similar proceeding under any law for relief ot debtors, or the involuntary appointment of a receiver, custodian, liquidator or trustee in bankruptcy of the property Of Debtor, if such petition or appointment is not vacated or discharged within sixty (60) calendar delYs after the fil1nq or maJt1ng thereof; or (e) the occurrence of a default under any security inatrument to which the security interests described in Section 5 hereof is junior and subordinate. Notwithstandinq the foreaoinq. no Event of Default shall have occurred hereunder until . to itten notioa su n . 0 A eement ebto shal ve to cure such default on or Drior to the date fifteen C151 davs after such notice. Vpon the occurrence of an Event of Default, city may, at its option, declare the entire unpaid principal balance and accrued interest to be immediately due and payable in full or pursue any and all other ramedies provided hereunder, under the Agreement, under the Guaranty, or as otherwise provided at law or in equity. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the entire unpaid principal balance and unp~id interest accrued thereon shall bear interest from the date of ~he Event of Default until such detault is cured at a defelult interest rate Of sevent percent (7%) per annum. ,I 5. This Note is secured by Debtor's pledge pursuant to the terms of the Agree~ent of certain personal property located 1n the countr of San Diego, State of Cellifornia (the "Collelteral") as more part cularly desoribed therein, and (b) all other existing and future agreements or writings, executed in favor of city securing this Note. 6. This Note is guaranteed by Colrich Investments, Ltd., L.P., a California limited partnership pursuelnt to that oartain Guaranty dated concurrently herewith. 7. Debtor acknowledges that if any payment required under thia Note is not paid within fifte.n (15) days after the date when the same becomes due and payable, the holder hereof will incur extra administrative expenses (i.e., in addition to expenses 2 /3 --/7 VVj-"'v o.J..J Il\oj .10.1'.11 Vi.l I V~ VUV1.U '.I...,ljll 1 .I~U .I...... .)1...... 1,.111..1""1 I....... incident to receipt of timely payment) and the loss of the use of funds in connection with the delinquency in payment. Because, from the nature or the cas., the actual damages suffered by the holder hereof by reason of such extra administrative expenses and loss of use of funds would be impracticable or extremely dirficult to asoertain, Debtor agrees that ten percent (10') of the amount of ths delinquent payment shall be the amount of damages to which such holder is entitled, upon SUch breach, in compensation therefor. Therefore, Debtor shall, in such event, without further notice, pay to the holder hereof as such holder's sole monetary recovery to cover such axtra administrative expense. and loss of use of funds, liquidatQd damages in the amount of ten percent (10') of the amount of such delinquent payment. The provisions of this paragraph are intended to govern only the determination of damages in the event of a breach in the performance of the Obligation of Debtor to make timely payments hereunder. Nothing in this Note shall be construed as an express or implied agreement by the holder hereof to forbear in the collection of any delinquent payment, or be construed as in any way giving Debtor the riqht, express or implied, to fail to mllke timely pllymente hereunder, IoIbether upon poyment of liIuch damages or otherwise. The right of the holder hereof to receive payment of such liquidated and actulIl dllmages, and receipt thereof, are without prejudice to the right of such holder to collect such delinquent payments and other amounts provided to be paid hereunder or under any security for this Note or to declare a default hereunder or under any security for this Note. 8. Accrued but unpaid intereliJt not paid when due and any unpaid liquidated damages shall bear interest as principal. All payments of this Notes shall be made in lawful money of the United states of Amerioa and in il1ll1lediately ,available funds at city's office, the address for which is specified in the Agreement, or at such other place as the holder hereof m~y form time to time direct by written notice to Debtor. J 9. Debtor waives any right of offset it now has or may hereafter have against the holder hereof and its successors and ossigns..1 Debtor waives presentment, demand" protest, notice of protect, notice of nonpayment or dishonor and all other notices in connection with the delivery, acceptance, performance, default or enforcement of this Note (other than notices expressly required by the terms of the Agreement). Notwithstanding any provision herein or in any instrument now or hereafter securing this Note the total liability for payments in nature of interest shllll not exceed the limits imposed by the applicable usuary laws. 10. Debtor expressly agrees to any extension or delay in the time for payment or enforcement of the Note, to renewal of this Note and to any substitution or release of any of the Collateral, all without any way affecting the liability of Debtor hereunder. Any delay on city's part in exercising any right hereunder shall not operate as a waiver. City's acceptance of partial or J /J--/~ Uvl-~~-~~ r~j j~.jf viii ur vnU~h V!~Jn rnl\ nu, "t~:J UI0"t J. U\J delinquent payments or the failure of city to exercise any rights shall not waive any obligation of Debtor or any right of City, or Dodify this Hate, or waive any othGr similar default. 11. Debtor agrees to pay all oosts of collection when inourred and all costs inourred by the holder hereof in exeroising or preserving any rights or remedies in connection with the enforcement and administration Of this Note or fOllowing a default by Debtor, including but not limited to reasonable attorney' fees. xt any suit or action is instituted to enforce this Note, Debtor promises to pay, in addition to the costs and disbursements otherwise allowed by law, such sum as the court may adjudge reasonable attorney's fees in such suit or action. 12. This Note shall be governed by and construed acoording to the laws of the state of California. 13. Time is of the essence for each iIond every obligation under this Note. 14. Debtor represents and warrant=- that: Ca) it haa full legal right, power and iIouthority to execute and fully perform its obligations under the Hate and the Deed of Trust; and (b) the persons executing this Note on behalf of Debtor are the duly designated agents of Debtor and are authorized to do so and (O) that the execution at this Note and the Deed o~ Trust have been authorized by a duly adopted resolution of its Board of Directors. "Debtor" : .1 GCF Laundry of Chula vista, Inc~ California corporatjon By ~~ 4-~~ TitleJ/ta p.1/~ C'''o.-.OCI' 4 JJ-JJ UvJ-C~-~~ r~j j~.cc v!11 ur vnU~N VluJn rn^ 1'I.U. '1L.\.I Ul0'i r. .1.;.1 BmIBIT B 1. As used herein, the term "Property" shall mean the GCF Property as described in the Agreement. 2. GCF's pledge in this Agreement covers the fOllowing propGrty: All present and future inventory and equipment as those terms are defined in the Uniform Commercial Code, ~nd all other present and future personal property of any kind or nature whatsoever, now or hereafter located at, upon, or about the property or used or to be used in connection with or relating or arising with respect to the Property and/or the dGve1opment, construction, use, occupancy, operation, lease or sale thereof, including without limitation all present and future fixtures, goods, machinery, plwnbing and plUmbing material and suppliGs, heating and air conditioning material and Bupplies, roofing, paint, drywall, insulation, cabinets, ceramic material and supplies, flooring, carpeting, appliances, fencing, landscaping and all other materials, supplies and property of every kind and nature. 5U~ft' M~ ""'1i0 tNteres+-- b~-fe7) bi b~F, Securri-i . ~ .I ..- ):3 --;;<0/13-21 VV.I ...1.0' \Jw I ~~~ ~w'''-w .....oL I I "", "....\,J""~l 'oL.... IU . ,IU ,I,..... U..."" ....,1.\.1'. GUARANTY Thill CUARANTY (the "Guaranty") is made as of , 1993, by colrich Investments, Ltd., L. P. I a California limited partncrsbip ("Guarantor") whose address 1s 2665 Ariana Drive, Suite 207, San Diego, Ca. 92117, Attn: Richard Gabriel, in favor of the city of Chula vista, II. municipal corporation ("Holder"), whose address is 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, Ca. 91910. In order to induce Holder to defer payment of a Sewer Capacity Fee owed to it by GCF Laundry of Chula Vista, Inc., a California corporation ("Debtor") in the amount of Forty Nine Thousand Five Hundred Six Dollars ($49,506) to be evidenced by II. promissory Note of even date herewith ("Note") executed by Debtor and payltble to Holder, Guarantor unconditionally and irrevocably guarantees to Holder and to its successors, endorsees, and assigns, the full and prompt payment of the Note in accordance with its terms, when due, by acceleration or otherwise, and the full, prompt, and complete performance of all obligations of Debtor set forth in the Agreement for Deferral of Sewer Capacity Fee [1655 Broadway, Suite 8, Chula Vista] between Debtor, Holder and Guarantor and in any security aqreement, or any other aqreement now or hereafter securinq performance under the Note (the Note and each document .scuring performance under the Note are collectively referred to herein as the "Deferral Documents"). 1. Modification. Waiver or Release of Securitv. Guarantor shall oontinue to be liable under this Guaranty, and its provisions shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding: Ca) Any modification, agree~ent, or stipulation between any Debtor and Holder, or their respective successors and assigns, with respect to the Deferral Doouments~ or , Cb) Holder's waiver of or failure to enforce any of the terms, covenants, or conditions contained in the Deferral Documen1s, or any modification of the Deferral Documents; or (c) Any release of any real or personal property or other security then held by Holder for the performance of the obligations hereby quaranteed. 2. In order to secure its obligations hereunder, Guarantor hereby pledges, grants, sets over and assigns to Holder a security interest, pursuant to Division 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code as adopted in California, in the followinq property (a) all Guarantor's right title and interest in and to all present and future rents and other amounts due and payable pursuant to that certain Shopping Center Lease by and between Guarantor and Debtor dated April 8, 1993 with respect to certain real property described therein located at 1655 Broadway, Suite B, Chula Vista, california; 1 J3---~~ u",n-'-\J~\J'" r1\.J .1...1''-..1 1.1.1.11 Vl VUVi..JI 'Ju.lll .I Uti nv, ..11....... V.I V"'t J. ,l.U and (b) any and all other security interests obtained by Guarantor in Debtor's assets. Guarantor agrees to perform suoh further acts and to exeoute'and deliver suCh additional documents as may be reasonably required in order to perfect Holder's security interest in such property and to otherwise carry out the provisions of this Guaranty. 3. Guarantv of PaYment. The liability of Guarantor on this Guaranty is a guaranty of payJllent and performance and not Of collectibility, and is not conditional or contingent on the genuineness, validity, regularity, or enforceability of the Deferral Doc\UUents or other instruments relating to the obligations hereby gUaranteed or the pursuit by Holder of any rQ~edie. that it now has or may hereafter have with respect thereto. 4. Effect 01' BanJcrwotcv. The liability of the Guarantor under this Guaranty shall in no way be affected by: (a) The release or discharge of Debtor in any creditor proceeding, receivership, bankruptcy, or other proceeding; (b) The impairment, limitation, or modification of the liability of Debtor or the estate of Debtor, or of any remedy for the enforcement of Debtor's liability, resulting from the operation of any present or future provision of the Bankruptcy Code (Title 11 of the United States Code, as amended; 11 use 5S 101-1301) or any bankruptcy, insolvency, debtor relief statute (state or federal), or any other statute, or from the deoision of any court; (c) The rejeotion or disaffirmance of the indebtedness, or any portion of the indebtedness, in any such prooeeding; or (d) The cessation, from an~ cause whatsoever, whether oonsen,ual or by operation of law, of the liability of Debtor to Holder. , ' 5. Claims in BankruDtcV. Guarantor will file all claims aqainst,Debtor in any bankruptcy or other proceeding in which the tiling of claims is required by law on any indebtedness of Debtor to the Guarantor, and will assign to Holder all rights of Guarantor on any such indebtedness. If Guarantor does not file any suoh olaim, Holder, as attorney-tn-fact for Guarantor is authorized to do so in the name of Guarantor, or, in Holder's discretion, to assign the olaim and to file II. proOf of claim in the name of HOlder's nominee. In all such cases, whether in bankruptoy or otherwise, the person or persons authorized to pay such claim shall pay to Holder the full amount of any such olaim, and, to the full extent neoessary for the purpose, Guarantor assigns to ~older all of Guarantor's rights to any such payments or distributions to which Guarantor would otherwise be entitled. 2 /3 ~~3 VVJ-c..v-v,) n\J. 1,)'(..,,* \"/111 VI' \"/U\.H..IJ 'Ii J.uJII I Jltl Jtv, '.U..,) V1U"t "1.... 6. Waiver of Defenses: Notioel Demand: statutes of Limitation. Guarantor hereby waives: (a) Diligence and demand of pa~ent; Cb) All notices to Guarantor, to any Debtor, or to any other person, including, but not limited to, notices of the acceptance of this Guaranty, or the creation, renewal, ektension, modification, or accrual of any obligations contained in the Deferral Documents or notice of any other matters relating thereto; Cc} All demands whatsoever; (d) Any statute of limitations affecting liability under this Guaranty or the enforcement of this Guaranty; Ce) Any duty on the part of Holder to disclose to Guarantor any facts it may now or hereafter know about Debtor, regardless or Whether Holder has reason to believe that any such facts materially increase the risJt 1)eyond that whioh Guarantor intends to assume, or has reason to believe that such facts are unknown to Guarantor, or has a reasonable opportunity to oommunicate such tacts to Guarantor, it being understood and agreed that Guarantor is fully responsible for being and keeping informed of the financial condition of Debtor and of all oiroumstances bearing on the risk of nonpayment ot any indebtedness hereby guaranteed; and Cf) All principles or provisions ot law that conflict with the terms of this Guaranty. Moreover, Guarantor agrees that it. obligations shall not be affecte~ by any circumstances that constitute a legal or equitable discharge of a guarantor Dr surety. 7. Waiver of Defenpes: Exhaust~on of Security: prooeedina Aaainst Debtor: Exercise ot Riahts and Remedies Under Loan Documents. Guarantor further agrees that nothing contained in this Guaranty shall provent Holder from suing on the Note or from exercising any rights available to it thereunder or under any of the Deferral Documents, and that the exercise of any of the aforesaid rights shall not constitute a legal or equitable discharge of Guarantor. Guarantor understands that the exercise by Holder of certain rights and remedies contained in the Deterra1 Documents may affect or eliminate Guarantor'. right of subrogation asainst Debtor an that Guarantor may there tore sucoeed to a partially or totally nonreimbursable liability hereunder, nevertheles., Guarantor hereby authorizes and empowers Holder to exercise, in its 601e discretion, any rights and remedie., or any oombination thereof, which may then be available, since it is the intent and purpose of Guarantor that the obligations hereunder shall be absolute, independent, and unconditional under any and all circumstances. without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Guarantor expressly waives any and all benefits under California 3. )3':2( UVj-c~-~j r~j Ij.c~ 1.1111 ur vt1UI.H VliJlH rHII IIU. ~,~ UIO~ r, c.u Civil Code sections 2809, 2810, 2819, 2845, 2849, 2850, and 2855, and California Code of civil Procedure Sections 580a, 580b, and 580d. Notwithstanding any foreclosure of the lien of any deed of trust or security agreement with respect to any or all of any real or personal property secured thereby, whether by the exercise of the power of sale contained therein, by an action for judicial foreclosure, or by an acceptance of a deed 1n lieu of foreclosure, Guarantor shall remain bound under this Guaranty. 8. Subordination of Guarantor's Riohts. Until all the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Deferral Document,. on the Debtor'" part to be performed and observed are fully performed and observed, Guarantor: (a) Shall have no right of subrogation again,.t Debtor by reason of any payments or acts of perforDlllnce by GUArantor in oompliance with the obligations of Guarantor under this Guaranty; (b) waives any right to enforce any re~edy that Guarantor shall have against Debtor by reason of anyone or more Payments or acts of performance in compliance with the obligations of Guarantor under this Guaranty; and (c) Subordinates any liability or indebtedness of Debtor held by Guarantor to the obligations of Debtor to Holder under any of the Deferral Documents or any other instr~ent of indebtedness. 9. ADDlication of PaYments: Refunds. With or without notice to Guarantor, Holder, in its sole discretion and at any time and from time to time and in suoh manner and on such terms as it deems fit lIlay: (a) Apply any or all paY11'ents or recoveries from Debtor, trom Guarantor, or from any other guara~tor or endorser under this or any 'other instrument, or realized frolll any security, in !Ouch manner, order, or priority as Holder sees fit, to the indebtedness of Debtor to Holder under the Deferral Doc~ents, whether such indebte~ness is guaranteed by this Guaranty or is otherwise secured or is dUe at the time of such application; and (b) Refund to Debtor any payment received by Holder on any indebtedness hereby guaranteed and payment of the amount refunded shall be fully guaranteed hereby. Any recovery reali~ed from any other guarantor under this or any other instrUment shall be first credited on that portion of the indebtedness of Debtor to Holder that exceeds the maximum liability, if any, of Guarantor under this Guaranty. 10. Notice. Whenever the parties hereto desire to give or serve any notice, demand, or reguest with respect to this Guaranty, each such communication shall be in writing and shall be effective only if it is delivered by personal service or mailed by registered 4 .---- / J ~ ,,2.3> vv, ~v V~ "~J ,~I~I Vi" V~ .....UUMU "",",UI 1'.., "...... -,....... v~\"rl .,..... or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt reque5ted, addressed as set forth in the first paragraph of this Cuaranty. Such communications sent shall be effective when they are received by the addressee thereof; but if sent by registered or certified mail, they shall be effective three (3) days after being deposited in the United states mail. Each party hereto may change its address for such communications by given notice to the other party in conformity with this paragraph. 11. successors and Assiqns: .Joint and several Liabili tv: Gender: Sinqular Includes Plural. This Guaranty shall be binding on Guarantor, its heirs, representatives, administrator, executor5, successors, and assigns and shall inure to the benefit of and shall be enforceable by Holder, its successors, and assiqns. Should this Guaranty be signed by more than one party, all obligations herein contained shall be deemed to be the joint and several obligations of eaoh party executing this Guaranty. As used herein, the singular shall inc~ude the plural, and the masculine Bha~l include the feminine and neuter, and vice versa, if the oontext so requires. 12. Nonwaiver. No provision of this Guaranty or right of Holder under this Guaranty oan be waived, nor can Guarantor be released from its ob~igationl; under thb Guaranty except by a writing duly executed by an authori~Qd representative of Holder. GUlLrantor shall oontinue to bQ liable under the terms or this Guaranty notwithstanding the transfer by Debtor of a~~ or any portion of the property encumbered by the Deferra~ Documents. 13. Authori~ation, If Guarantor is a corporation, each individual executing this Guaranty on,behalf of the corporation represents and warrants that he 1s duly authorized to execute and deliver this Guaranty on behalf of the 'corporation, in accordance with a ,duly adopted resolution of the BOard of Directors of the corporation, in accordance with its terms. 14. Attornevs' Fees. Guarantor shall forthwith pay to Holder the amonnt of all attorneys' fees and costs incurred by Holder under and pursuant to this Guaranty, or in the defense or enforcement of Holder's interests (whether or not Holder tiles a lawsuit against Guarantor) in the event Holder retains counsel, or incurs costs in order to: obtains legal advice; enforce, or seek to enforce, any ot its rights; commence, intervene in, respond to, or defend any action or proceedings; file or prosecute a claim in any action or proceeding (including, without limitation, any probate clailll, bankruptcy c~aim, third party claim, or secured creditor claim); or represent Holder in any litigation with respect to Guarantor's affairs. L5. Governinq Law. This Guaranty shall be governed by and oonstrued in accordance with the laws of the state of California. 5 )Jrc2~ Uvj-",r",,,,, 1'&\.1 .1",,''-U VJ. i1 ur VUULoH . h.IJU I Ufi JlV, "t'-"" UJ.U"t ,. '-~ 16. Severability. Every provision of this Guarant;y is intended to be severablQ. In the event any term or prov~sion hereot 18 declared to be illegal or invalid, for any reason whatsoever, by a court of competent jurisdiction, such illegality or invalidity shall not affect the balance Of the terms and provisions hereot, which terms and provisions shall remain blnalng and enforceable. 17. Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence under this Guaranty and any amendment, modification, or revision of this Guaranty. 18. Entire AQ"reement. boept as provided in any other written aqreement now or at any time hereafter in torce between Holder and Guarantor, this Guaranty shall constitute the entire agreement of Guarantor with Holder with resPQct to the subjeot matter hereof, and no representation, undQrstanding, promise, or condition concerning the sUbject matter hereof shall be blndinq on Holder unless expressed herein. 19. Waiver of Chanqe in structure of Borrowina Entitv. A change in the name, location, composition, or structure of the principal debtor sub.equent to the agreement's execution will not act to relieve the Guarantor of its liability. 20. Cumulative Riahts. The amount of Guarantor's liability and all ri9hts, powers, and remedies of Holder hereunder and under any othQr agreement now or at any time hereafter in force bQtween Holder and Guarantor, including, without limitation, any other quarantee executed by Guarantor relating to any indebtedness of Debtor to Holder, shall be cumulative an~ not alternative, and such rights, powers, and remedies shall be in addition to all rights, powers, and remedies given to Holder by law. This Guaranty is in addition to and QXclusive of the guaranFee of any other guarantor of ~ny ~ndebtedness of Debtor to Holder. [NEXT PAGE IS SIGNATURE PAGE] ,I 6 ):3 co2? "''''. ....... ....... . hI............ ...... .... ....-..... ...- ... . .... ..... .-.-....... IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Guarantor has eXQoutQd this Guaranty as of the year and date first above written. COI.RICH INVESTMENTS, LTD., L.P. a California limited partnership By: Dev pmQnts, Inc., corporation , ~\A.IJ\eIONPJUET .\ 7 /3ro< ~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Itemd Meeting Date 11/9/93 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing to consider adoption of an interim pre-SR-125 Development Impact Fee and to consider modification of the existing Transportation Development Impact Fee (continued from October 26, 1993) a. Ordinance .,25?9 Adopting an interim pre-SR-125 development impact fee to be effective January 1, 1995. b. Ordinance .2.5})'''O Amending Ordinance 2251 of the City of Chula Vista relating to a Transportation Development Impact Fee to pay for transportation facilities in the City's Eastern area to be effective 60 days after the second reading. SUBMITTED BY: Resolution 17.361'1 Accepting a report prepared by Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff Engineering Consultants regarding the feasibility of constructing an interim facility to provide transportation capacity in Chula Vista prior to construction of SR-125 (interim pre-SR-125 facility) (This resolution does not re~qUire a public hearing but is a related item.) Director of Public Work~ City Manager g (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..K..) c. REVIEWED BY: On July 27, 1993, Council opened the Public Heanng regarding revision of the existing Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Development Impact Fee (TransDIF) and the creation of a new development impact fee related to the construction of an interim roadway system prior to construction of SR-125 (interim pre-SR-125 DIF). Testimony taken at that meeting showed that there was not a consensus as to how the new fees should be distributed. Council directed staff to work with the developers toward such a consensus, and return with the item. Council also asked staff to address specific issues raised at the July 27 meeting. That information was transmitted to the Council on October 26, 1993, but the public hearing was continued to this date due to lack of agreement by affected developers. The issue discussion has not changed appreciably since October 26, but staff does have some modified recommendations. The following table highlights the major changes from the July 27 recommendation to this recommendation: /'1) Page 2, Item J i Meeting Date 11/9/93 Transportation Development Impact Fee Interim SR-125 Fee Separate Fee Structure for TransDIF and Interim SR-125 DIF Date of Implementation July 27, 1993 Recommendation $3,402 Nov. 9, 1993 Recommendation $3,815 $1,430 Yes $ 820 Yes 1/1/94 TranDIF. January, 1994 SR-125DIF: 1/1/95 Yes TransDIF Commercial land use adjustment Orange Avenue and Eastlake Parkway funding Financial Consultant TransDIF Administration Fee No SR-125DIF No 4% Yes 5% RECOMMENDATION: 1) Hold the public hearing, adopt the ordinances establishing an interim pre-SR-125 transportation facility fee (SR-125 DIF) to be effective January 1, 1995 and amending the Transportation Development Impact Fee to be effective 60 days after second reading of the ordinance, and; 2) Approve the resolution accepting the attached report regarding the feasibility of constructing an interim facility to provide transportation capacity for Chula Vista prior to construction of SR-125, and; 3) Accept the suggestions made by the developers regarding a cooperative program planning and financing management effort which is over and above that work currently done by City staff and authorize staff to proceed with a (Request for proposals) RFP for an alternative funding consultant to assist in that process. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. Please see the staff report for the July 27 meeting (attached). DISCUSSION: Attached to this staff report is the staff report from the July 27 meeting. That report provides the background for this hearing and is intended to supplement this agenda statement. Subsequent to the July 27 meeting, the developers have held meetings among themselves under the auspices of the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) The meetings have not produced a single acceptable solution to the issue for all parties, however, the meetings have produced two significant benefits. to clarify the unresolved issues, and to produce the following helpful suggestions: I. Create an oversight committee. consIstIng of City and property owners/developer representatives to meet on a regular basis to evaluate the adequacy of fees and the need and scheduling of facilities. ) L/;;L Page 3, Item~ Meeting Date 11/9/93 2. Retain a consultant with expertIse in identifying alternative funding sources and finding ways to expedite funding. The consultant would be paid from the TransDIF support funds 3. Reduce the currently proposed facilitv cost estimates by 10% to reflect funding available through the State-Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP). This would generally reduce the fees paid by developers by 10%. Staff supports the suggestions, with the exception that staff feels that a 5% reduction (as opposed to the 10% proposed) is more appropriate, since the cost estimates contain design, inspection and administration costs that are not eligible for SLTPP funds and thus must be funded from this source. The 5% reduction has been factored into the proposed fees. After the meeting with the developers and CIF In which the above suggestions were brought out, staff received the attached October 6, 1993 letter from the CIF setting out a suggested scope of work for a consultant to be hired by the City using TransDIF and SR-125 funds. The consultant would be very extensively involved in the administration of the two fee programs. Staff does not concur with the scope of work suggested by the CIF because we already have staff that accomplish the same tasks. The suggestions made at the meeting, however, will require consultants with a knowledge and contacts !,)r Federal and State funding programs who, hopefully, are able to bring in outside funding and reduce the overall cost of the program. The original suggestions also provide for mOl e ongoing cooperation in the programs implementation. Preliminary estimates by staff and the developers for these services range from $40,000 to $50,000 per year for the initial years while the need for developing financial sources is greatest and before SR-125 is constructed. Staffs primary recommendation is to have two separate fees, one for SR-125 and one for the regular transportation DIF (TransDIF), with somewhat different benefit areas. In both instances, the fee would be uniform throughout the benefit area. Staff is of the opinion that this straightforward formula is the most equitable to all property owners. However, staff recognizes that there are many points of view with respect to equity, and that many of the points raised have merit. While seemingly complex, staff believes that the real division among the developers is the issue of the equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) credits previously received in the TransDIF. The specific question being whether or not these umts, after paying a fee which included funds for some portions of SR-125, should participate financially in the construction of the Interim pre- SR-125 facilities. For many of the developers, large amounts of money are involved in the decision. Developers holding significant numbers of credits maintain that the credits result from pioneering major road construction (East H Street, Otay Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road), and incurring significant unreimbursable costs (financing, administration, district formation, etc.). They also maintain that they were led to believe that having these credits would complete their fee obligations for those properties. J'I-j Page 4, Item / tj Meeting Date 11/9/93 Developers without credits note that lack of full participation in the program requires either: I) a substantially larger fee for the remaining participants, or 2) expansion of the pool of participants, which shifts the financial burden to properties developing farther in the future and who may not be able to use the facility. Understanding this to be the primary issue, staff developed a proposal that attempts to provide both sides of this issue with equal consideration. Staff is offering this proposal as a potential solution to this difficult problem and will describe it in more detail following the discussion of issues raised at the July 27, 1993 hearing. Generally, however, it does not appear that universal support for anyone proposal is possible With respect to issues raised by correspondence, Attachment A provides a package of the letters and staff response to the concerns raised in those letters. The developers have been satisfactorily answered on most of the issues. The remaining issues in the letters, and issues raised either at the Public Hearing or subsequent to it consist of the following: 1. Proposal to combine the TransDIF and interim pre-SR-125 fee into one fee. 2. Proposal to have separate fees, but exempt properties that have prepaid the TransDIF fee. 3. Proposal to split the SR-125 fee into two or more zones recogmzmg that properties closer to 1-805 will not use these facilities as much. 4. Proposal to give properties that have prepaid the TransDIF fees credit for the SR-125 portion of that fee. 5. Request to address the issue of situations where the fee is lowered (commercial land uses) to the point where prepaid fees arc greater than the fee due. 6. Can social or economic benefits be considered in developing or applying the fee? 7. Request for the property owners to participate in a joint program planning and financing management effort of the TransDif and Interim SR-125 DIF. In many instances, the above issues relate to the developer's questions, "How much does my project need the interim facility?" "Where is my project in the development process?" and "How much is the interim SR-125 going to cost my project?" From a historical perspective, staff is of the opinion that all of the projects acknowledged the need for the interim facility as a part of the Growth Management Program, and Council approved the projects based on this acknowledgement. This placed the City in the position of approving projects somewhat beyond the City's ability to provide such infrastructure, based on assurances that the developers would participate in a reasonable program to provide the needed facilities (the Public Facility Financing Plan). The assumption that led to these approvals was that all parties would participate based on mutual need/mutual benefit. Based on the further input received at this /i-L( Page 5, Item~ Meeting Date 11/9/93 last meeting with the developers, staff has modified the original recommendation contained in the July 27 agenda statement and now recommends a fee that supports numbers 4 and 5, above. DISCUSSION OF ISSUES 1. Proposal to combine the TransDIF and interim pre-SR-125 fee into one fee. The effect of this proposal is to combine all of the facilities into one fee. This then would not provide a separate fnnd for SR-125 facilities under the present accounting methods (however, a special fund could be created). Currently, about 7,000 EDU's out of 22,830 EDU's in the SR-125 fee program have credits against payment of TransDIF fees. Since the credits are in the form of EDU credits, this would exempt these properties from fee increases (such as adding SR-125 facilities) although it should also exempt these properties from fee decreases (see issue No 5) These 7,000 EDU's represent more than 30% of the total EDU pool. Excluding them from these increase forces the other developers to pay fees 33% greater than they would pay under the original staff recommendation. Staff notes that this shifts more of the burden onto the shoulders of later developers and is not recommending it for this reason. The proposal does have merit when one considers that, if the SR-125 Tollway is built, the fees will be reduced to reflect the cost the remaining needed facilities. This benefit will not be realized by earlier developers, since construction of the tollway will not be assured for several years at best. 2. Proposal to have separate fees, but exempt properties that have prepaid the TransDIF fee. The current staff proposal for the SR-125 DlF has a different benefit area from the TransDIF, since the SR-125 DIF is intended as an interim facility to provide relief well before the build out of the TransDIF area. Included in the package are maps showing the two different boundaries. Thus, the issue becomes two separate issues, depending on whether the new SR- 125 DIF uses the previously defined area of benefit, or uses the larger TransDIF area of benefit. a. Maintain SR-125 DIF area of benefit As discussed in the previous item, there are approximately 7,000 EDU's of credits in the TransDIF program. Using the smaller area of benefit of the SR-125 DIF, credits would reduce the participating properties from 22,830 to 15,779, increasing the fee from $1,358 per EDU to $1,964. Some of the developers believe that, since previous TransDIF's included projects for some SR-125 facilities, they have paid for those projects and should get credit. Staff is of the opinion that exclusion of so many units places an unfair burden on the remainder and that developers participated in an overall system and not individual projects. Developers constructing DIF streets got credit based upon only that project and did not make additional deposits for other projects. Using that logic, the City should have created specific project funds and required the ) t/-S Page 6, Item ! i Meeting Date 11/9/93 developers to pay individually for each. The revised staff recommendation does not give this credit b. Use the larger TransDIF area of benefit The area of benefit contains 32,753 EDU's and would pay $9481EDU Subtracting EDU credits, the remaining 25,722 EDU's would have to pay $1,520IEDU The larger area of benefit, however, presents legal issues, since the engineering study (HNTB report) shows that the facilities cannot serve all of the properties in the benefit area. The fundamental problem that arises is the proposal to develop a financing program relying upon collection of fees from properties, which will not necessarily be able to develop when the facilities are constructed. The merits of this proposal are the same as those cited on issue # 1. 3. Proposal to split SR-125 DIF into two or more zones recognizing that properties closer to I-80S will not use these facilities as much. This issue acknowledges the fact that differently situated properties will use the interim facilities to a differing extent Traffic from San Miguel Ranch, for example, is not likely to use East Orange Ave. to the same extent as Otay Ranch. Staff recognizes this fact, but notes that this point does not consider that the building of interim facilities is designed to remove traffic from existing arterials, providing additional capacity on the entire system. Properties that do not directly benefit from the interim facilities benefit from the increased capacity on the existing arterials. Thus, staff believes that the entire area of benefit suffers from the lack of these facilities and benefits equally from their presence. As an example, less traffic would travel west on "H" Street or Telegraph Canyon Road from Eastlake and Salt Creek, thus freeing up capacity for Rancho del Rey and Sunbow. In subsequent discussions, the developers have generally agreed that this concept is not as important as other issues raised. Staff, therefore, has eliminated this concept from the subsequent analysis. 4. Proposal to give properties that have prepaid the TransDIF fees credit for the SR- 125 portion of that fee. This issue involves recognition that the previous TransDIF program had facilities in it which were identified as SR-125 facilities. Properties that have prepaid the TransDIF through EDU credits from assessment districts would be paying for these same facilities twice if they were charged the new fee. Staffs view of the TransDIF is that the participants were buying into a program, not a group of individual facilities. Past participants paid fees and facilities (such as East H Street) were constructed with those funds, rather than earmarking a portion of each fee to a specific facility. If portions had been earmarked as described, a developer constructing a facility could not be repaid completely until all fees had been collected at the end of the program (approximately 2015). Never the less, it is true that, as the developers indicate, the TransDIF already paid was based on certain SR-125 facilities being Included. Therefore, staff believes that it is an J'I~? Page 7, Item I if Meeting Date 11/9/93 appropriate compromise to give credit for that part of the fees paid. Under this new recommendation, any developer with outstandin)l EDU credits will still pay the SR-125 DIF, but the amount will be reduced by the portion of the EDU credit that would be attributable to the SR-125 facilities that were included to come up with the previous fee. 5. Request to address the issue of situations where the fee is lowered (commercial land uses) to the point where prepaid fees are greater than the fee due. As indicated in the July 27 Agenda statement, staff is proposing to lower the trip generation factor for commercial property from 400 trips per acre to 250 trips per acre. This issue arises as a result of that change when assessments placed on the property as EDU credits exceed the proposed fee. This creates a situation where some properties that "prepaid" their fee would be paying more than their current fee obligat1<Jn This situation is the exact opposite of issues 1 and 2 in the sense that the developer has either prepaid fees, and completed the obligation, or has not. To look at situations when the fee is lowered under one standard and where fees are raised under another standard is, on the surface, contradictory. However, as pointed out on page 12 under the heading of Commercial Land Uses in the July 27 agenda statement, the previous trip generation rate placed an inordinately heavy burden on commercial properties. There!()re, staff is now recommending modifying the TransDIF to include a fund of approximately $8lJO,000 to resolve such situations, bring equity to all undeveloped commercial property and to encourage such needed economic development. However, staff is not recommending that refunds be given until the SR-125 DIF takes effect and that those refunds be used to balance out the new SR-125 DIF costs. 6. Can social or economic benefits be considered in developing or applying the fee? This issue proposed to take social or economic benefits into consideration with respect to fee burden. With respect to establishment of the general fee structure, this proposal presents difficulties, since the other parties participating in the fee program are assessed based on a uniform factor (i.e. trip generation). As a policy, to depart from the uniform nexus in certain cases is risky in that if too many situations are adjusted because of "social or economic benefits", the entire fee could be more successfully challenged by a party not receiving such benefit. Staff, therefore, recommends that Council consider reducing fees based on social or economic contributions on a case-by-case basis The following tables compare the financial im pacts identifying the fee or fees necessary to implement, the total fees and the parties that benefit most from the proposal (compared with staff recommendation as a baseline). As previously discussed in this report, issue NO.3 is not analyzed and issue number 6, social or economic benefit consideration was not included in this chart because the specific proposal is not sufficiently defined to estimate fees associated with the issue. 7. Request for the property owners to participate in a joint program planning and financing management effort of the TransDif and Interim SR-125 DIF. ;'-1-7 Page 8, Item / '-I Meeting Date 11/9/93 When the SR-125 DIF item was first presented to Council on July 27, 1993, a companion proposal from the developers and Construction Industry Federation was included regarding the adoption of a proposal for a cooperative management effort for program planning and financing of the DIF programs. This management effort would be in addition to the administrative efforts already performed by City staff on those programs, and are intended to enhance the City's development monitoring efforts. Because of the long lead times necessary for the planning and financing of major infrastructure. such as the interim SR-125 facility and the major streets within the TransDIF, it wJiI become increasingly important to evaluate the phasing of new development and the timing of major capital improvement projects to make sure that facilities will be available when nceded. The additional measures will ensure that the City and developers are aware at the earliest possible time of any potential facility needs that will be required in order to maintain adopted threshold standards so that either the City, using DIF funds, or the developers can program it' s construction. This proposed cooperative management program would also make a strong effort to obtain additional outside funding for the needed improvements to reduce the cost of the DIF programs to the benefit of the new home purchaser. City staff met with the developers to go 0\ CI the suggested scope of work for a consultant to be involved in this effort to obtain outside funding. The result is shown as attachment B to this agenda statement. Both City staff and the developers believe this management program and proposal for a consultant to assist would be very beneficial. However, in the discussion it became apparent that the outside consultant would require additional funding over and above that contained in the previously recommended DIF. Therefore, it was agreed that, in order to provide the necessary financing, the TransDlF support should be increased from the currently proposed 4% to 5%. Development Impact Fee Recommendations In an effort to reconcile the different points of view with respect to the EDU credits, staff has put forward a proposal to include East Orange /\\enue and Eastlake Parkway in the TransDIF, instead of inclusion in the proposed interim SR-125 DlF Additionally, approximately $800,000 is proposed to be included to resolve the commercial land use (Issue 5) problem. The fees resulting from the transfer as compared with staffs July 27, 1993 recommended fee are as follows: o[ 19lna] July 27, ICJ93 Staff Recommendation Proposal TransDIF $3,401 $3,815 SR-125 DIF $1,41U $ 820 Total $4,832 $4,635 ;t/ -Y Page 9, Item /1 Meeting Date 11/9/93 It should be noted that the reduction in total fee IS the result of the following mechanisms: I) The 5% reduction in total project costs resulting from "other source funds". 2) The moving of $13,342,000 in costs for Orange Avenue and Eastlake Parkway from the SR-125 DIF to the TransDIF puts them in an area of benefit 12% larger, thus reducing the fee per EDU. The original S12,646,OOO SR-125 DIF is reduced by 41%. The TransDIF increases from $87,500.111)0 111 total costs to $100,842,000. 3) The Interim SR-125 DIF includes "financing costs" that are not a component of the TransDIF The "financing costs" must be built into the fee because insufficient funds will have been collected to pay for the construction without selling bonds. 4) The TransDIF support fee is increased from 4% to 5% to provide funding for a consultant to assist in obtaining outside funding sources 5) The Interim SR-125 DIF is recommended to go into elfect on January I, 1995 to help encourage new construction in the current slow economy The recommended fee is somewhat higher than if it were effective immediately based upon a low inflation and the lower number of EDU's available because of units which would be built in 1994. Approximately 1700 EDU's were anticipated to be constructed in 1994, which reduces the pool of units available to pay t()r the interim SR-125 facility should it be necessary to build it. The 1700 EDU's include residential, commercial and industrial developments. 6) The amended TransDIF fee would go into effect 60 days after the second reading. This would allow for the additional projects and commercial adjustments from 40 EDU's per acre to 25 EDU's per acre to go Inlo effect. However, it is also recommended, and included in the ordinance, that no commercial refunds be made until the Interim SR-125 DIF takes effect. At that time refunds could be made in conj unction with additional payments required by the Interim SR-125 DIF. 7) Add approximately $800,000 to the TransDIF to bring individual assessments on commercial properties in line with fee ob ligations where assessments exceed the new obligation. To the developers, the advantage of this proposal can be substantial. For properties with EDU credits, the SR-125 fee would be reduced bv nearly 50% (TransDIF fees would not be affected because of the EDU credits). For projects without EDll credits, the total fees would be reduced as shown on the above table. Additionally, this proposal separates the clearly interim facilities (in the sense that they would not be needed if the freeway/tollroad is constructed) from the roads in the "permanent" (Gene! al Plan) network. The disadvantages of this proposal are that no consideration is given to financing the TransDIF facilities and that the monies for Orange Avenue and Eastlake Parkway are commingled with 1'1-; Page 10, Item :\1eeting Date 11/9/93 1'-/ other TransDIF funds. Some developers had previously expressed a desire that a separate fund be created for SR-125 funds to assure th,ll the funds were not utilized for other facilities and , therefore, not available when needed. Stalf does not believe that the disadvantages constitute major obstacles, and therefore believe that this proposal is a good solution. MAJOR DEVELOPERS IMPACTED Description MrVlillin Eastla'<<' Ba'dwin Sunbow San Miguel Issue No. Total EDU's remaining 3,385 12,427 X.542 2,905 2,179 Remaining EDU's witb out 1,115 9/>111 X.lx2 2,905 2,179 credit 1,2b Retain Credits, TransD IF area 13.1%,(00) 2J6X.OIIII Ill,X76 420,000 788,037 2a Retain Credits, SR-125 DlF 12.1154,000) (4,4%,{HHI) 3,X2X.1I1I1I 1,754,000 815,000 area 4 125 Credit 15X9,000) (X66,IIIH)) X()(,.l)(J) 352,000 163,000 5 Commercial Adjustment 45,000 (64UHH)) D5.000 120,000 90,000 SR Staff Recommendation * I I 597,000) 329,()()1I 52.IH)() (212,000) 370,000 * Based upon all of the remaining units for each developer paying both fees. Staff has made an allowance in the SR-125 D1F for a years total EDU's, but cannot make any estimates as to how many each developer would build in 1994. Also included in your package is an updated version of the Transportation Development Impact Fee Report presented at the July 27 hearings Proposed Development Monitoring Policies When the SR-125 DIF item was first presented to Council on July 27, 1'193, a companion (part b) proposal was included regarding the adoption of a Council Policy on development monitoring policies and procedures to implement the City s Growth Management Program (GMP). These policies and procedures would be in addition to those already in place as part of the GMP, and are intended to enhance the City's development mOllltoring efforts. Because of the long lead times necessary 1(lr the planning and tinanc11lg of major infrastructure, such as the interim SR-125 facility, it will become increaSingly important to evaluate the phasing of new development and the tim)l1g of major capital improvement projects to make sure that facilities will be available when added. The additional measures will ensure that the City, other service providers (e.g., school and water districts), and developers become aware at the earliest possible time of any potelltial facility needs that will be required in order to maintain adopted threshold standards. /t/,/cJ Page 11, Item~ Meeting Date 11/9/93 In recent review with the City Attorney's Office, it has been suggested that adoption of the proposed policies might be best handkd through an amendment to the actual Growth Management Program document ThIS would place all monitoring policies in a single document for the sake of reference and clarity, and may present other advantages for policy implementation. Planning Department staff will be meeting with the Public Works Department, and City Manager's and City Attorney Offices in the com I ng weeks to refine this approach. As the GMP amendment will require noticed public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council, it is anticipated that this time will be returned for Council action in January 1994. FISCAL IMPACT: Fiscal impact to the City would involve revenues to administer and support the program or programs, which would be essentially constant from proposal to proposal. The administrative cost of thc TransDIF has been an average of $268,000 per year ranging from a high of $488,000 in the first year (1990/91) to a la\', of $142,000 in 1991/92. WPC F:\IIOivIE\ENGINEER\AGE1'IDA\sr125.2 102993 ;'1--// <! J- U) > <! --l :::) :r: u LL o >- }- - U ~ ~ '" >- z ~ '" " " CD ~ .... iii 11-;:) 1&1 It o 0 ~ -t m ~ >- ~ >- CD .... ~ ~ IL ~ v a 3 , , III QI '" 1<1: QI QI "" oJ' U III C. S H oJ' ~ QI S C. 0 ..... QI > QI Q ~ 0 -.-I oJ' oj oJ' k 0 C. III ~ III k E< ... J <5 2: 1&1 t:> 1&1 I , .... I i I . I I I . I I ~ --.~ ~r'-' I I . r-.J j . I ~ " '" > % .. .. ~ ~ IQ a I- I&J % '" .. II. ::I 10,1 ... " o 0 .. m ~ > ~ >- g) ~ a II::!: IL :> 'Z <:I:uo3 ,., " ,., ..J I , I i I . I I I . I I III Q) ~ .... ..... .... Q) J:: CU I'Q Q) Q) .... .... t) III !:lo a H III N rI <i f- (f) j> I l<i -1 ::J I o l.L o >- r- - o II: III ~ --- .1 ....~.,.... ~..,..- I : ,.J j i Jtj~/J / /J/-30 ATTACHMENT B SUGGESTED SCOPE OF WORK FOR A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS REGARDING THE ADMINISTRATION OF THE EASTERN CHULA VISTA TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND THE STATE ROUTE 125 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAMS Introduction The following describes the Scope of Work for a multi-year management effort regarding the program planning and financing of the Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Development Impact Fee (Trans-DIP) and the pre-state Route 125 Development Impact Fee (pre-SR 125 DIF) Programs. The City of Chula Vista will oversee this effort and the selected consultant will be expected to work in partnership with City staff and property owners in the conduct of this work. Background The City has recently proposed a comprehensive update of the Trans-DIP which was originally established in January of 1988. The last update occurred in December, 1990. The Trans-DIF was originally based on a financial and engineering study of the major streets required to serve anticipated development in the City's eastern area with the premise that all new development would share equitably in the cost of these major streets. The City intends to continue using this methodology with some slight modifications. Other adjustments in the Trans-DIP program are also proposed, including an increase in the program support component. Since continued development in the eastern area is expected to result in a significant increase in traffic on the planned road system, the City has concluded that a major north-south facility will be also necessary to service continued development. While construction of a toll road in the State Route 125 corridor would help meet this need, the viability and timing of such a project is uncertain. If a toll facility is not built, this portion of SR 125 is not currently proposed for construction by Caltrans. In January, 1992, the City commissioned a study to analyze future transportation needs and develop contingency plans in the event that SR 125 is not constructed in a reasonable time frame. A report has been completed which contains a recommended roadway system and suggests a financing plan to pay for the improvements. The City is considering the adoption of a pre-SR 125 DIP to serve as the primary mechanism for funding construction of the identified interim facilities. Over the past year, there have been a number of meetings involving area developers in an attempt to achieve consensus on the proposed fees. In general, the developers support the use of development impact fees as a primary method to finance construction of the necessary improvements. However, the development community has proposed the pursuit of a reasonable level of non-local matching funds in support of the overall Trans-DIF and pre-SR 125 DIP )'1- J I improvements In addition, the property owners have suggested the establishment of a joint City/property owner effort to establish the program planning and financing strategies required for the successful implementation of the DIF programs. The City agrees with the need for an effective approach to the administration of the Trans-DIF and pre-SR 125 DIF programs. The purpose of this Request for Proposals is to solicit input from qualified firms interested in providing program planning and financing expertise. Overall Approach It is intended that the fee program planning and financing effort will be conducted in partnership with City staff. The City will oversee the activities of the consultant, and it will be necessary for the consultant to work closely with City staff and property owners on the effort. Developing an effective approach to implementing the necessary transportation improvements and seeking alternative funding sources are major objectives of this effort. The consultant should plan to take advantage of existing studies and data where feasible, and not duplicate work which has already been accomplished. The Scope of Work for this effort includes four related tasks: Task I. Plan and Program Review Task 2. Plan Development and Implementation Task 3. Local Agency Coordination Task 4. SR 125 Toll Road Coordination Task Descriptions 1. Plan and Program Review This phase involves a review of all related transportation planning data for the City's eastern area, including the City's interim SR 125 transportation plan for the area, the improvements proposed as part of the Trans-DIF Program, the current Caltrans/California Transportation Ventures plans for the toll road in this corridor and the eastern area transportation facility financing plans developed as a condition of development project approvals. 2. Plan Development and Implementation This task requires the development of appropriate funding and construction phasing plans, as well as an overall strategy for implementing the required transportation improvements. As part of this task, the consultant should identify funding options, outline an appropriate strategy for obtaining those funds, and advocate for allocation of the funds as directed by the City. To effectively l'-l~ 3:L- accomplish this element, it will be necessary to review and determine cash flow requirements based on the timing of facility construction and the availability of funding. This effort will also require ensuring that the assessment process, the development of alternative funding sources, and plan implementation activities are all accomplished on time and on budget. 3. Local Agency Coordination Because of the proximity of other jurisdictions to the transportation projects in the City's eastern area, this task requires that the consultant assist the City in coordinating with those agencies. The consultant will be expected to assist in assuring the completion of the projects within other jurisdictions and will assist the City in developing interjurisdictional financing plans. 4. SR 125 Toll Road Coordination Because of the importance of the SR 125 toll facility to the transportation capacity of the City's eastern area this task requires that the consultant assist the City in coordinating with Caltrans and California Transportation Ventures representatives. The consultant will be expected to offer advice on project delivery and to assist the City in providing local input to the project development process. It is intended that this involvement with the toll facility project will provide a more solid technical background for consideration of other project alternatives if the toll road is not constructed. (F:HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \SR125RFP .SCP) )'-1/ J} ORDINANCE NO. :J c:; 14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM PRE-SRI25 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN TERRITORIES WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements require that adequate, safe transportation facilities be available to accommodate the increased traffic created by new development, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that potential delays in the construction of State Route (SR) 125 by CALTRANS or others will adversely impact the City's ability to accommodate said increased traffic, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that new development within the Eastern Territories will create adverse impacts on the City's transportation system which must be mitigated by the financing and construction of certain transportation facilities identified in this Ordinance, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a reasonable means of financing the transportation facilities is to levy a fee on all development in the Eastern Territories of the City, and WHEREAS, the fee has been justified by the financial and engineering study entitled "Interim State Route 125 Facility Feasibility Study" dated May 1993, and prepared by Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff. WHEREAS, the financial and engineering study and the City's General Plan show that the transportation network will be adversely impacted by new development within the Eastern Territories unless new transportation facilities are added to accommodate the new development, and WHEREAS, the financial and engineering study and the City's General Plan establish that the transportation facilities necessitated by development in the Eastern Territories comprises an integrated network, and WHEREAS, developers of land within the Eastern Territories should be required to mitigate the burden created by development through the construction of transportation facilities within the boundaries of the development, the construction of those transportation facilities outside the boundaries of the development which are needed to provide service to the development in accordance with City standards, and the payment of a fee to finance the development's portion of the total cost of the transportation network, and Page I Ill-A -( WHEREAS, all development within the Eastern Territories contribute to the cumulative burden on the transportation network in direct relationship to the amount of traffic originated by or destined for the development, and WHEREAS, the amount of traffic generated has been determined based upon average daily trips for various land areas based upon studies conducted by SANDAG (commercial trips being modified to eliminate passerby trips) and verified by the financial and engineering study prepared for the purposes of this fee, and WHEREAS, the SANDAG traffic generation determinations have been used by numerous public agencies in San Diego County for various purposes, including the preparation of General Plan Circulation Elements, the justification of traffic impact fees, and transportation planning, and have been determined to be a reliable and accepted means of allocating the burden on a transportation network to development to be serviced by the network, and WHEREAS, on July 27, 1993, the City Council held a duly noticed meeting at which oral or written presentations could be made, and WHEREAS, the City Council determined based upon the evidence presented at the meeting, the City's General Plan and the various reports and other information received by the City Council in the course of its business that imposition of the Interim pre-SR-125 impact fee on all development in the Eastern Territories for which building permits have not yet been issued is necessary in order to protect the public safety and welfare and in order to ensure effective implementation of the City's General Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount ofthe fee levied by this Ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the transportation facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: Establishment of Fee. (a) An interim pre-SR-125 development impact fee in the amounts set forth in subsection (d) is hereby established to pay for transportation improvements and facilities within the Eastern Territories of the City. The fee shall be paid before the issuance of building permits for each development project within the Eastern Territories of the City. The fees shall be expended only for the purposes set forth in this ordinance. The Director of Finance is authorized to establish various accounts within the fund for the various improvements and facilities identified in this ordinance and to periodically make expenditures from the fund for the purposes set forth herein in accordance with the facilities phasing plan or capital improvement plan adopted by the City Council. The City Council finds that collection of the fees established by this ordinance at the time of the building permit is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the construction Page 2 /4 A .. 2. of facilities concurrent with the need for those facilities and to ensure certainty in the capital facilities budgeting for the Eastern Territories. (b) Said fee shall be in effect commencing January 1, 1995. (c) The fee established by this section is in addition to the requirements imposed by other City laws, policies or regulations relating to the construction or the financing of the construction of public improvements within subdivisions or developments. (d) The fee for each development shall be calculated at the time of building permit application based upon the following schedule: Development Type Single Family Detached Dwelling Single Family Attached Dwelling Multi-Family Dwelling Commercial Industrial TransDortation Fee $820/Dwelling Unit $656/Dwelling Unit $492/Dwelling Unit $20,500/Gross Acre $16,400/Gross Acre The City Council shall annually review the amount of the fee. The City Council may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the Engineering-News Record Construction Index, the type, size, location or cost of the Transportation Facilities to be financed by the fee, changes in land use designations in the City's General Plan, and upon other sound engineering, financing and planning information. Adjustments to the above fee may be made by resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule. (e) The fees collected shall be used by the City for the following purposes as determined by the City Council: 1. To pay for the construction of facilities by the City, or to reimburse the City for facilities installed by the City with funds from other sources. 2. To reimburse developers who have been required by Section 4(a) of this ordinance to install improvements that are street facilities and are listed in Section 3. IL( A - 3 Page 3 3. To reimburse developers who have been permitted to install improvements pursuant to Section 4(b) of this ordinance. 4. To administer and update the fee program including retaining consultants to perform engineering of financing studies. SECTION 2: Definitions. For the purposes of this ordinance, the following words or phrases shall be construed as defined in this Section, unless from the context it appears that a different meaning is intended. (a) "Building Permit" means a permit required by and issued pursuant to the Uniform Building Code as adopted by reference by this City. (b) "Developer" means the owner or developer of a development. (c) "Development Permit" means any discretionary permit, entitlement or approval for a development project issued under any zoning or subdivision ordinance of the City. (d) "Development Project" or "Development" means any activity described in Section 65927 and 65928 of the State Government Code. (e) "Eastern Territories" means that area of the City located between Interstate 805 on the west, the City sphere of influence boundary on the east, Bonita Road on the north, and the alignment of the proposed extension of East Orange Avenue on the south, as shown on the Chula Vista General Plan. The property known as Bonita Gateway located at the northeast quadrant of Bonita Road and 1-805 intersection is also included. For the purposes of this fee, Eastern Territories shall be further restricted to exclude the following projects: Eastlake Trails Eastlake Vistas Eastlake Woods Eastlake Business Park II Bonita Meadows Phases of Salt Creek Ranch exceeding 1043 Equivalent Dwelling Units Phases of San Miguel Ranch exceeding 1350 Equivalent Dwelling Units (t) "Financial and engineering study": means the "Interim State Route 125 Facility Feasibility Study" dated May, 1993, and on file in the Office of the City Clerk. SECTION 3: Transportation Facilities to be Financed by the Fee. Page 4 If A - if (a) The transportation facilities to be financed by the fee established by this ordinance are: Segment 1 Sweetwater Road (Bonita Road to SR-12S) Segment 2 Bonita Road (Sweetwater Road To San Miguel Road) Segment 3 San Miguel Road (Bonita Road to Proctor Valley Road) Segment 4 Proctor Valley Road (San Miguel Road to SR-125 ccrridor) Segment 5 SR-l25 Corridor (The SR-12S corridor is the right-of-way reserved through Eastlake and Salt Creek I) (b) The City Council may modify or amend the list of projects in order to maintain compliance with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. SECTION 4: Developer Construction of Transportation Facilities. (a) Whenever a developer of a development project would be required by application of City law or policy, as a condition of approval of a development permit to construct or finance the construction of a portion of a transportation facility identified in Section 3 of this ordinance, the City Council may impose an additional requirement that the development install the improvements with supplemental size, length or capacity in order to ensure efficient and timely construction of the transportation facilities network. If such a requirement is imposed, the City Council shall, in its discretion, enter into a reimbursement agreement with the developer, or give a credit against the fee otherwise levied by this ordinance on the development project. (b) A developer may request authorization from the City Council to construct one or more of the facilities listed in Section 3. The request shall be made in writing to the City Council and shall contain the following informational conditions: 1. Detailed description of the project with a preliminary cost estimate. 2. Requirements of developer: preparation of plans and specifications for approval by the City; secure and dedicate any right-of-way required for the project; secure all required permits, environmental clearances necessary for construction of the project; provision of performance bonds; payment of all City fees and costs. Page 5 /'f A -5' 3. The City will not be responsible for any of the costs of constructing the project. The developer shall advance all necessary funds to construct the project. SECTION 5: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by John Lippitt, Director of Public Works Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney WPC F:\bome\eogineer\878.93 Page 6 I c{-A ' ~ ORDINANCE NO.~ 58b AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2251, RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN TERRITORIES WHEREAS, in January 1988, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted Ordinance No. 2251 establishing a development impact fee for transportation facilities in the City's eastern territories, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2251, the City has commenced the collection of development impact fees to be used to construct transportation facilities to accommodate increased traffic generated by new development within the City's Eastern Territories, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section l(c) of Ordinance No. 2251 and California Government Code Sections 66000, et. seq., the City Council has caused a study to be conducted to reanalyze and reevaluate the impacts of development on the transportation system for the City's eastern territories and, to further reanalyze and reevaluate the development impact fee necessary to pay for the transportation facilities which financial and engineering study prepared by City staff, is entitled "Eastern Area Development Impact Fees for Streets 1993 Revision" dated July 13, 1993, and WHEREAS, the financial and engineering study and the City's General Plan show that the transportation network will be adversely impacted by new development within the eastern territories unless new transportation facilities are added to accommodate the new development, and WHEREAS, the financial and engineering studies and the City's General Plan establish that the transportation facilities necessitated by development in the eastern territories comprise an integrated network, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that developers of land within the Eastern Territory should be required to mitigate the burden created by development through the construction of transportation facilities within the boundaries of the development, the construction of those transportation facilities outside the boundaries of the development which are needed to provide service to the development in accordance with City standards and the payment of a development impact fee to finance the development's portion of the costs of the transportation network, and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby determines that the legislative findings and determinations set forth in Ordinance No. 2251 continue to be true and correct, and IlfB -I Page 1 WHEREAS, on July 27, 1993, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held a duly noticed meeting at which oral or written presentations regarding the development impact fee for the City's eastern territories could be made, and WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented to it including the "Eastern Areas Development Impact Fees for Streets" study the City Council determined that certain amendments to Ordinance No. 2251 are necessary in order to assure that there are sufficient funds available to finance the transportation facilities necessary to serve the eastern territories by the development impact fee, and WHEREAS, the City Council determines, based on the evidence presented at the meeting, the City's General Plan, and the various reports and information received by the City Council in the ordinary course of its business, that the imposition of traffic impact fees on all development in the eastern territories for which building permits have not been issued is necessary in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare and in order to assure effective implementation of the City's General Plan, and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount of the amended fees levied by this Ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the transportation facilities, and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is appropriate to resolve the fees for commercial land uses to reflect the fact that many of the trips associated with the commercial land uses are in fact, trips associated with other land uses that incorporate an intermediate stop at a commercial land use (passerby trips), and WHEREAS, it is necessary to ensure the timely payment of the "DIP program support" cost item, included in Table 2 "Capital Improvement projects - cost estimate summary" of the financial and engineering study to adequately fund ongoing and future administration activities and studies, and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that reduction of trips from commercial land uses may place an inordinate burden on commercial land uses where public facility assessments have been placed on the affected properties in anticipation of payment of transportation fees, and as a result of said adjustment, the proposed fees are now lower than the value of the assessments. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That the development impact fee schedule set forth in Section l(c) of Ordinance No. 2251 is amended to read as follows: 1'18,2.. Page 2 Development Type Transportation Fee Single Family Detached Dwelling $3,815/Dwelling Unit Single Family Attached Dwelling $3,052/Dwelling Unit Multi-Family Dwelling $2,289/Dwelling Unit Commercial $95,375/Gross Acre Industrial $76,300/Gross Acre Religious Institutional $15,260/Gross Acre Golf Course $3,052/Gross Acre Medical Center $249,975/Gross Acre The City Council shall at least annually review the amount of the fee. The City Council may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the Engineering-News Record Construction Index, the type, size, location or cost of the Transportation Facilities to be financed by the fee, changes in land use designations in the City's General Plan, and upon other sound engineering, financing and planning information. Adjustments to the above fees may be made by resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule. SECTION 2: That the definition "Eastern Territories" as set forth in Section 2e of Ordinance 2251 is amended to read as follows: "Eastern Territories" means that area of the City located between Interstate 805 on the west, the City sphere-of-influence boundary on the east, Bonita Road on the north and the alignment of the proposed extension of East Orange Avenue on the south, as shown on the map entitled "Developable Land Area (Map 1)" of the financial and engineering study. The property known as Bonita Gateway located at the northeast quadrant of Bonita Road and 1-805 intersection is also included. SECTION 3: That the definition of "Financial and Engineering studies" as set forth in Section 2f of Ordinance No. 2251 is amended to read as follows: "Financial and engineering studies": means the "Interim Eastern Area Development Impact Fees for Streets" study prepared by George T. Simpson and Willdan Associates dated November 1987, the "Eastern Area Development Fees for Streets" study prepared by Willdan Associates dated November 19, 1990, and the "Eastern Development Impact Fees for Streets - 1993 Revision" study Jtft3'3 Page 3 prepared by City staff dated July 13, 1993, which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk". SECTION 4: That the list of facilities and programs set forth in Section 3(a) of the Ordinance No. 2251 is amended to read as follows: The transportation facilities and programs to be financed by the fee established by this Ordinance are: 1. * State Route 125 from San Miguel Road to Telegraph Canyon Road. 2. * State Route 125 from Telegraph Canyon Road to Orange Avenue. 3. Telegraph Canyon Road from Paseo Del Rey to east of Paseo Ladera/north side. 3a. Telegraph Canyon Road at 1-805 interchange/Phase II. 4. ** Telegraph Canyon Road - Phase I Rutgers Avenue to EastLake Boundary . 5. ** Telegraph Canyon Road - Phase II Paseo Ladera to Apache Drive. 6. Telegraph Canon Road - Phase III Apache Drive to Rutgers Avenue. 7. East H Street - 1-805 interchange modifications. 8. ** East H Street from EastLake Drive to SR-125. 9. ** Otay Lakes Road from Camino del Cerro Grande to Ridgeback Road. 10. Otay Lakes Road from Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange Avenue. 11. Bonita Road from Otay Lakes Road to Central Avenue. 12. Bonita Road from Central Avenue to San Miguel Road. 13. San Miguel Road from Bonita Road to SR-125 14. ** East H Street from State Route 125 to San Miguel Road. /~8 ,~ Page 4 15. Proctor Valley Road (East H Street) from San Miguel Road to Hunte Parkway. 16. Orange Avenue from Oleander Avenue to Sunbow Eastern Boundary . 17. Palomar Street from Oleander Avenue to Sunbow Eastern Boundary . 18. ** Telegraph Canyon Road from eastern boundary of EastLake to Hunte Parkway. 19. ** EastLake Parkway from Telegraph Canyon Road to EastLake High School southern boundary. 20. Hunte Parkway from Proctor Valley Road to Telegraph Canyon Road. 21. ** Hunte Parkway from Telegraph Canyon Road to Club House Drive. 2la. Hunte Parkway from Club House Drive to East Orange Avenue. 22. Orange Avenue from EastLake Parkway to Hunte Parkway. 23. Paseo Ranchero Road to Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange Avenue. 24. East Orange Avenue from eastern Sunbow Boundary to EastLake Parkway. 25. East Orange Avenue - I-80S Interchange Modifications. 26. East Palomar Street from eastern Sunbow Boundary to Paseo Ranchero. 27. East Palomar Street at I-80S Interchange. 28. Telegraph Canyon Road from Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road. 29. East Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to Olympic Training Center. 30. Telegraph Canyon Road from SR-125 to EastLake Parkway. 31. EastLake Parkway from Fenton Street to Telegraph Canyon Road. 32. East H Street from I-80S to Hidden Vista Drive /'1-&,5 Page 5 33. Bonita Road at Otay Lakes Road Intersection. 34. Otay Lakes Road at Elmhurst Drive Intersection. 35. East H Street at Otay Lakes Road Intersection. 36. Traffic Signal Interconnection - Eastern Territories. 37. EastLake Parkway from EastLake High School Southern Boundary to East Orange Avenue. 38. East H Street from Paseo Del Rey to Tierra del Rey. 39. Bonita Road from 1-805 to Plaza Bonita Road. *Project is now included in the interim pre-SRl25 transportation facility fee. **Project has been completed. SECTION 5: PAYMENT OF "DIF PROGRAM SUPPORT" The "DIF Program Support" shall with no exceptions be paid in cash concurrently with the development impact fee at a rate equal to 5 % of the total applicable fee. SECTION 6: This section shall become effective concurrent with the date the City Council determines the interim Pre-SRI25 fee to be effective per Ordinance No. _' Commercial land uses with street improvement assessments placed on the property shall be eligible for a refund of the amount that the current Transportation Development Fee exceeds the initial value of the assessment placed on the property. Said refund shall be in one of the following forms: 1. Credit against payment of interim Pre-SR125 DIF fees. 2. Reduction in the value of lien against the property and assessments associated with such lien. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective 60 days after its adoption. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt Director of Public Works C:\or\884.93 Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney /Lf 8..(0 Page 6 RESOLUTION NO. r7~blf RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A REPORT PREPARED BY HOWARD NEEDLES TAMMEN AND BERGENDOFF ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS REGARDING THE FEASIBILITY OF CONSTRUCTING AN INTERIM FACILITY TO PROVIDE TRANSPORTATION CAPACITY IN CHULA VISTA PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF SR-125 WHEREAS, on August 20, 1991, by Resolution 16336, Council approved a contract with Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff (HNTB) for professional services in preparing a report which would analyze future transportation needs in Chula vista and help staff develop contingency plans in the event that SR-125 is not constructed in a timely fashion; and WHEREAS, HNTB has completed the report which contains a recommended roadway system, and a recommended financing plan as well as providing background and discussion of issues considered in developing the proposal. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby accept a report prepared by Howard Needles Tammen and Bergendoff Engineering Consultants regarding the feasibility of constructing an interim facility to provide transportation capacity in chula vista prior to construction of SR-125, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk. Presented by Approved as to form by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney C:\cs\HNTB Jl/e -I COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /3 Meeting Date 11/9/93 ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: Public Hearing: To consider fonnation of a fee recovery district for Otay Valley Road - Assessment District No. 90-2 Director of Public work~crrI City Manager J~ b~ ~;1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..K.) REVIEWED BY: On September 28, 1993, Council approved Resolution No. 17261 accepting engineer's report, declaring the City's intent to fonn a fee recovery district for Otay Valley Road Assessment District No. 90-2 and set November 9, 1993 as the date for the public hearing. Staff recommends that the hearing be continued. Affected property owners have been noticed that the hearing will be held on November 16. RECOMMENDATION: Continue the public hearing to November 16, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. DDS:File No. HX024 WPC F:\home\engineer.agenda\1373.93 )~/ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /? Meeting Date 11/09/93 ITEM TITLE: Report: City of Chula Vista Two Year Economic Development Plan Progress Report SUBMITTED BY: Economic Development Commission REVIEWED BY: City ManagerJ.Cs, 1>0 ~1 (4/Sths Vote: Yes _ No X) BACKGROUND: On August 28, 1991, Council adopted the City of Chu1a Vista's first Economic Development Plan, as recommended by the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission (EDC). This plan was developed by the EDC and approved by Council as an "economic development blueprint" for the City, an action plan identifying comprehensive goals and objectives related to business development and assistance. Also on August 28, Council approved the EDC's recommended Economic Development Marketing Plan and related budget. At an EDC special meeting on August 16,1993, the Commission directed staff to prepare a two- year update, highlighting accomplishments relating to the adopted Economic Development Plan. Staff has prepared a report which provides a status update beneath each Economic Development Plan Goal and Objective. This report is presented in Exhibit I. Exhibit I also includes 2 attachments, as follows: A) Chula Vista Marketing Plan Status Update, including Public Information Office Partial List of Press Releases/Media Advisories; and B) Permit Streamlining Implementation Status Report (submitted to Council as information item on October 5, 1993). RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) review and accept the Two Year Economic Development Plan Progress Report (September 1993) and, 2) provide any feedback to the EDC and staff Council deems appropriate. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The update was discussed at the October 6, 1993 meeting and unanimously endorsed at the November 3 meeting. DISCUSSION: EDC Chair William Tuchscher will make the update presentation to Council this evening. Staff will be available for questions. Provided below are highlights of key accomplishments per each Economic Development Plan goal. It should be pointed out that the Economic Development Plan is a Council approved action plan that entails implementation efforts by virtually all City departments. Departments most impacted include Community Development, Planning, Public Works and the Public Information Office. Hie:hlighted AccomDlishments Per Economic Development Plan Goals GOAL I: IDENTIFY THE EXISTING ECONOMIC BASE AND TARGET NEW BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY . Completion of Chula Vista comprehensive Market Study (currently being scheduled for a workshop presentation to Council). Includes retail, office, industrial and hotel/motel inventories, /~-/ Page 2, Item ~ Meeting Date 11109/93 extensive demographic and market-related information and statistics, focussed downtown study, retail leakage analysis, labor pool profile, NAFf A impact analysis, and other socioeconomic and real estate related data. The Market Study also includes a Chula Vista Target Industry Analysis. GOAL II: DEVELOP LAND USE AND INFRASTRUCTURE STRATEGIES TO SUPPORT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT GOALS . The EDC has endorsed the following projects which have entailed land use policy: . Bayfront Resort Complex (in negotiations) . Rancho Del Rey Power Center (in construction) . Bonita Grande Golf Resort (on hold) . The City negotiated an agreement with the Rancho Del Rey Power Center developer to subsidize mass transit for Southwestern College students. . In conjunction with the City's Workforce Development Team, staff has arranged for a revised bus route to accommodate the new Southbay Career Training Center. . The City has expedited development of SR 125 through proactive assistance to CALTRANS and evaluation of an Interim SR 125 which would meet transportation needs through 2007. (The EDC endorsed the Interim SR 125 proposal). . The City is designing the Otay Ranch community to encourage integrated alternative modes of transportation. The trolley line would connect with the 24th St. Station in the north down to the Otay Mesa Border crossing, connecting villages, the eastern urban core, and the planned university campus. An express bus corridor is also under consideration. . An Otay Valley Road Special Improvement District has been established to upgrade this industrial road. . City staff is working with San Diego County to expedite reconstruction of the Otay River bridge. . The City's High Tech/Biotech Zone Steering Committee is reviewing Eastlake's Planned Community Land Use Regulations to make them user friendly for these targeted businesses (possibly as a pilot project for application to other areas of the City). . The City's proposed Border Environmental Commerce Zone includes plans for an environmental incubator. . The City has initiated a Southwest Redevelopment Project Area Land Use/Economic Feasibility Study (south Third Ave. and Main St.) . The Bayfront Local Coastal Plan Amendment has been approved. . The Town Centre I "Reevaluation Project" is nearing completion. /t-.2 Page 3, Item /? Meeting Date 11/09/93 . The Chula Vista Market Study has evaluated the supply of existing commercially and industrially zoned property versus projected commercial and industrial demand (the results will be going to Council at an upcoming workshop). GOAL III: DEVELOP A COMPREHENSIVE MARKETING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS PROGRAM TO ATI'RACT AND RETAIN JOB AND REVENUE GENERATING BUSINESS AND INDUSTRY, AND TO ENHANCE COMMUNICATION WITH EXISTING BUSINESS AND CITIZENS . The Citywide Market Study has provided the City with a comprehensive market-related database as the fundamental building block of a professional marketing program. . Numerous professional marketing materials have been developed, including: . "Catch the Spirit" theme and logo developed . Two business outreach ads (image and recruitment) . Economic Development brochure . Tailorized fact sheets . Chula Vista exhibit (display) . A contract has been executed with Four Square Productions for production of a promotional video; this is on hold. . The City has participated in the following trade shows: . Biosummit 1992 and 1993 . South County EDC Economic Development Summit 1993 . Mexport 1993 . The City is cosponsoring Southwestern College's Binational Environmental Trade Show and Exposition in 1994. . City staff has frequently provided information to writers/editors of business related publications to encourage Chula Vista coverage. . The City has sponsored a wide range of special events to enhance the City's visibility and image (see Attachment B). The EDC has endorsed the Arturo Barrio Runs and the 1995 U.S. Womens' Olympic Marathon Trials in Chula Vista. . The City has actively issued press releases regarding economic development activities, and featured articles in the Quarterly. . The City has participated in joint marketing efforts, such as: . the Biomed Regional Land Use Directory (SDEDC) . the 1992 San Diego Tapestry (SDEDC, CONVIS,etc) . coordination with the Chamber to staff City exhibit . cosponsorship of the Robert Rau reception with local employers /"-J Page 4, Item /? Meeting Date 11/09/93 . cosponsorship of a "Shop Local" campaign in the Sun Times . The City has completed its Business Targeting Strategy and has already initiated targeting outreach efforts, including the High Tech/Biotech Zone and the Border Environmental Commerce Zone GOAL IV: DEVELOP A PROACTIVE BUSINFSS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM TO ENCOURAGE BUSINFSS RETENTION, GROWTH AND EXPANSION . The City published and distributed its first Redevelopment Newsletter to communicate with citizens and local business regarding redevelopment activities and opportunities. . The City/Redevelopment Agency approved funding for a Downtown Manager; numerous promotional activities have been undertaken. . Councilman Len Moore and Chamber CEO Don Read have conducted an average of 24 business site visitations monthly since summer 1992. . Broad ranging redevelopment activities have been undertaken, including: . Chula Vista Center expansion . Scripps Hospital DDA finalization . Auto Mall groundbreaking . A Workforce Development Team has been formed and is meeting monthly to pursue labor force readiness goals. . Good working relationships have been established with outside economic development entities to facilitate business assistance, including: . Small Business Development/International Trade Center . So. Co.EDC . San Diego EDC . California Trade and Commerce Agency . Job training agencies . Written materials have been prepared to assist business, including Building Permits and Business License brochures. A Chula Vista Business Resource Directory is in process. . Staff is evaluating the creation of a loan guarantee and other potential financial assistance programs. . The EDC recommended 25 permit streamlining initiatives which were approved by Council and have been implemented or are in process (see Attachment B). . Numerous projects have been fast-tracked, including Greyhound Expo, Rancho del Rey Power Center, and Kaiser Hospital. )" ~'I Page 5, Item / ~ Meeting Date 11/09/93 . The BECZ is pursuing the development of an incubator program. GOAL V: PROMOTE TOURISM AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CULTURAL, EDUCATIONAL, AND RECREATIONAL AMENITIES . The City has promoted tourism through publication of the Visitor Brochure, Nature Center brochures, and the "Catch the Spirit" brochure; and via issuance of press releases and media advisories for numerous special events (eg Harbor Days). . City staff have provided information and photos to CONVIS, and other organizations, including the CV Information Center. . As illustrated in Attachment A, the City cosponsors numerous visitor-drawing special events (eg Arturo Barrio Run). . The City has proposed a 200 acre resort land use adjacent to Lower Otay Lake, complimenting the Olympic Training Center. . The City and County have recommended an additional 700 acres be provided for the planned university campus. . The City entered into an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with Joelyn Enterprises to build a golf resort hotel; this agreement has expired and is on hold due to current economic conditions. GOAL VI: ENCOURAGE THE PROVISION OF BROAD RANGING HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES . A comprehensive update on housing activities is beyond the scope of this report; however, the City has been a leader in affordable housing activities, including: . MCC's . HUD housing preservation . Short-term and transitional housing . Mobile home and residential rehabilitation . Inclusionary housing program FISCAL IMPACT: None A TT ACH.1ENTS NOT SCANtED A:\EDCUPDA2.113 /b~5 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT /7 TITLE: Item Meeting Date 11/09/93 /' Resolution /?~t1J?authorizing issuance of Request for Proposals (RFP) to develop relevant financial indicators to be used in the rate setting process for Laidlaw Waste Systems SUBMITTED BY: Director of Financeyt Principal Manageme1f~~ssistant Snyder city Manager V ,~);j):l\\(4/5t1;1s Vote: Yes_ NO~) ....J='o U /7 Councl.l Referrals #2412, 2631, and 2639 REVIEWED BY: During the refuse and recycling rate review hearings for the past two years (FY 1991-92 and FY 1992-93), Council has requested that relevant financial and statistical information be provided regarding Laidlaw Waste System's operations. Staff encountered a significant hurdle to obtaining information which the company deemed proprietary and for which the City was unable to guarantee confidentiality. In order to approach the rate review process with confidence and to obtain relevant financial and statistical information, staff proposes to use an independent firm to assist in selecting relevant financial indicators and establish guidelines as to how these indicators will be used in the rate setting process. Laidlaw has agreed to pay the cost of hiring an outside firm. Attached to this report is a recommended draft Request for Proposals (RFP). RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolution and direct staff to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP), evaluate the responses and return to council with a recommendation for contract award. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: In the South Bay region of San Diego County, Laidlaw provides refuse and recycling collection and disposal services to the cities of Chula vista and Imperial Beach and the unincorporated areas of the County. Services to the cities are provided in accordance with exclusive franchise agreements which each allow the cities to approve rates for service. Services to the unincorporated County areas are provided in accordance with the County's permit system which does not retain rate approval authority. J7~1 Page 2, Item Meeting Date 11/09/93 I? Because of the physical proximity and operational economies, Laidlaw's routes are not necessarily laid out by jurisdiction. Therefore, the systemwide costs of operations have historically been allocated to the respective jurisdictions when rate increases have been requested. This approach is reasonable in the industry and may serve to allow lower costs to the ratepayer, but it provides difficulties for staff analysis and verification of rate increase requests. staff recommends that the City obtain the services of an independent firm through an RFP process to assist in developing statistical indicators relevant to the solid waste collection and disposal industry. The ideal firm will have expertise in refuse rate analysis and experience in solid waste rate and regulatory services. The cost of the services will be paid by Laidlaw. Chula vista will administer the contract, working with Laidlaw to ensure complete and efficiently-obtained information. The primary reasons for recommending action at this time are: 1) Council Direction- As previously noted, Council has specifically directed staff to obtain additional financial information regarding Laidlaw's results of operations. An independent third party has the ability to sign a confidentiality agreement with Laidlaw, review necessary documentation and translate the data into appropriate terms which are of interest to the Council without breaching confidentiality. 2) pendina Reauest For Rate Adiustment- In March 1993 Laidlaw applied for a rate adjustment for refuse collection and curbside recycling based on a 2.1% increase in the consumer price index. The request was denied by the City Manager because of lack of any financial data from Laidlaw supporting the proposed increase. Beginning September 1, 1993, Laidlaw began maintaining separate financial information for the City of Chula vista franchise. In the past, financial information has been available only on a division basis in which Chula vista was a portion of a larger service area. This change should make it easier to develop relevant financial indicators regarding Laidlaw's operations in Chula vista. simolified Annual Rate Reviews- During the past two years, the City has experienced annual rate reviews which have been lengthy, confusing and expensive for both the City and Laidlaw. By establishing relevant financial indicators that can be used in the annual rate setting review, the process will be simplified and much more efficient. 17'.2 Page 3, Item Meeting Date 11/09/93 /7 The Proposed RFP The draft RFP included as Attachment A clarifies the main objectives of this project are the development of financial information and statistical indicators that can be used in comparison to "industry standards" and incorporation of this information into the rate setting process. The RFP also defines the scope of work expected and a detailed list of tasks and minimum requirements. Also outlined are standard City requirements for "hold harmless" provisions, adequate coverage and evidence of insurance, conflict of interest, etc. Selection criteria are included and will not be based solely on cost. Potential firms will be evaluated in a number of areas, including (but not limited to): specialized experience in refuse rate analysis, particularly with similar public agencies; ability to work effectively and cooperatively with staff and Laidlaw; and past records of performance. It is not staff's intent that the services provided by an independent firm will result in a renegotiation of the existing franchise, but will provide relevant information that can be used by the City Council in the rate setting process. The current franchise agreement, which terminates in the year 2002, provides for annual increases based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI). However, increases in landfill rates are treated as pass- through costs. Any rate-setting methodoloqy change that may be recommended as a result of this project would be subject to further discussion between the City and Laidlaw. Timeline The RFP would be issued immediately after Council approval and is expected to allow 30 days for responses. The length of the evaluation and negotiation process will be driven by the number, quality and complexity of proposals received. It is expected that the project will be completed within 60 days of the contract award. FISCAL IMPACT: Since the cost of the services will be paid by Laidlaw, there is no fiscal impact as a result of council's action on this item. The project is estimated to cost in the range of $10,000 to $20,000. /7--J RESOLUTION NO. /73tJ5 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS (RFP) TO REVIEW RATE SETTING PROCESS FOR LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS WHEREAS, during the refuse and recycling rate review hearings for the past two year, Council has requested that the rate setting process for solid waste collection and disposal be reviewed and that relevant financial information be provided; and WHEREAS, staff encountered a significant hurdle to obtaining the information which the company deemed proprietary and for which the City was unable to guarantee confidentiality; and WHEREAS, in order to approach the rate review process with confidence and to obtain relevant financial and statistical information, staff proposes to use an independent firm to perform a financial review of Laidlaw's operations and the rate setting process; and WHEREAS, Laidlaw has agreed to pay the cost of hiring an outside firm; and WHEREAS, staff proposes the Request for Proposals, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the issuance of Request for Proposals to review rate setting process for Laidlaw Waste Systems and direct staff to evaluate and return to Council for a recommendation for contract award. Presented by by It ~L Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance Bruce M. Boogaard, Attorney C:\rs\laidlaw.rfp /7-'/ //1-5 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP RELEVANT FINANCIAL INDICATORS TO BE USED IN THE RATE SETTING PROCESS FOR THE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE BY LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS,INC. The City of Chula Vista ("CITY") invites proposals to develop financial indicators to be used in the rate setting process with Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. ("CONTRACTOR") to the CITY. In general, the firm selected through this process ("CONSULTANT") will be: 1. Developing financial indicators of results of operations of Laidlaw Waste Systems and comparing this information with industry standards. 2. Reviewing and recommending modifications, if appropriate, to the current rate setting process incorporating the use of financial indicators. BACKGROUND INFORMATION INTRODUCTION In the South Bay region of San Diego County, the CONTRACTOR provides refuse and recycling collection and disposal services to the CITY and unincorporated areas of the County. Services to the CITY are provided in accordance with the CITY's Franchise Agreement which allows the CITY to approve the CONTRACTOR'S rates. Services to the unincorporated County areas are provided in accordance with the County's permit system which does not retain rate approval authority. Because of the physical proximity and operational economies, the CONTRACTOR'S routes are not necessarily laid out by jurisdiction. Therefore, the systemwide costs of operations have historically been allocated to the respective jurisdictions when rate increases are requested of the CITY. It is the CITY's rate setting process that is the subject of this Request for Proposals. The CITY has a Franchise Agreement to the year 2002 with the CONTRACTOR to provide these services. Prudent management of the contracts, the current fiscal situation of the CITY, and the local economy's impact on the CITY's ratepayers are all reasons the CITY now desires to conduct this review. It is expected that the review process will be concluded within 90 days of approval of the contract. )7-~ CITY-SPECIFIC INFORMATION With a January 1993 population of 146,000, the CITY of Chula Vista has about 34 square miles within its incorporated boundaries. Located seven miles south of the City of San Diego, Chula Vista covers a wide spectrum of neighborhoods and businesses requiring a high level of service from the franchised waste hauler, Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. The Franchise Agreement for refuse collection and single-family residential curbside recycling services are overseen by the City Manager's Office and the Finance Department. The franchise agreement for refuse collection and disposal services has essentially been in effect since the 1950's when the services were provided by Chula Vista Sanitary Service. In 1982, the business was sold to GSX Corp. which was then purchased by Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. in 1985. The exclusive franchise rights were approved by the Chula Vista City Council consecutively with each new owner. The present agreement allowed a contract term to 1992, with a provision for two five year extensions at the CONTRACTOR's request, for an expected lifespan to the year 2002. Currently, the Laidlaw serves about 24,000 residential units, multi-family units, and commercial customers. Curbside recycling services are provided for the single- family residential homes. The CITY is in the process of determining whether or not Laidlaw will be providing future recycling program services for yard waste, multi-family homes, and businesses. That decision will be made in early 1993. OBJECTIVE OF THE RFP The CITY wants to develop standard financial indicators that can be used in the rate setting process which will be consistent from year to year, and will ensure rate payers a high level of service at reasonable rates while allowing the CONTRACTOR a reasonable profit and reimbursement for necessary reasonable and prudent costs associated with the furnishing of that service. Consideration shall be given to all solid waste and recycling operations: collection, transportation, disposal and marketing of solid waste and recyclables from the CITY. 2 /7-7 SCOPE OF WORK Following is a preliminary scope of work. The CONSULTANT is requested to develop a detailed scope of work in a task format. The scope of work should include a discussion of potential financial indicators to be measured including comparison of service rates with comparable jurisdictions; profit margin on service compared with industry average; analyses of CONTRACTOR'S expenditures to identify any unusual trends; and measurement of internal rate of return. The proposal is also to include, but not be limited to, a description of how the CONSULTANT will: Prepare a work plan including tasks to be performed, sequence of activities, elements of each task and a time schedule for all deliverable items. Perform benchmarking of pertinent information with an emphasis on Southern California. Collect required information from the CONTRACTOR for the past three (3) years. These will include standard financial reports (i.e. financial statements, general ledgers, etc.) and operational reports (route and account data). Consult with the CONTRACTOR's management for additional information. Analyze the data collected to determine whether expenses are a reasonable and necessary cost of business. Compare CONTRACTOR's figures to benchmark data. Review data collected for mathematical accuracy, logical consistency and reasonableness. Apply financial indicators to historical data to determine what the results would have been if the indicators had been applied historically. Develop written procedures and forms to be used with the methodology chosen. PROPOSAL REOUIREMENTS At a minimum, proposals must include: A statement of qualifications to do the work described herein. Resumes of those individuals to perform the work. References for similar projects performed for public agencies by those individuals to perform the work. Please provide names of public agencies, contact persons and phone numbers. Discussion of potential financial indicators that the CITY may consider. A schedule for accomplishing tasks defined in the proposal. Total estimated cost for accomplishing the work, to include hourly rates and allocation of hours and basis of other charges. This infonnation MUST be nrovided under senarate cover and NOT INCLUDED in the bodv of the nronosal. 3 ) 7-- (J" The name and business address of each subcontractor who will perform work or labor or render service to the CONSULTANT in performing the proposed contract. Include the specific portion of the work which will be done by each listed subcontractor. A completed Disclosure Statement for the City of Chula Vista (see attachment.) Proposal must reflect CONSULTANT'S ability to work effectively with CONTRACTOR in obtaining necessary information, to provide draft and final reports to CITY, and to make presentations to the CITY's staff and Council. By submitting a proposal, CONSULTANT agrees that CITY is authorized to conduct relevant background investigations. Proposal must be submitted in a single-spaced, double-sided format on recycled paper and should not exceed 25 pages. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION In addition to the background information provided and the description of the services needed, the CONSULT ANT should be aware of the following items: A standard "hold harmless" provision and "conflicts of interest" statement will be included in the contract. CONSULTANT may be required to provide proof of professional errors and omissions coverage for a minimum of $1,000,000. CONSULTANT may be required to maintain comprehensive general liability and property damage insurance covering all operations, its agents and employees, including but not limited to, premises and automobiles, with a minimum coverage of $1,000,000 combined single limits. Evidence of this coverage, in the form of a Certificate of Insurance and Policy Endorsement which names the CITY as Additional Insured, would be submitted to the City Clerk of CITY upon approval of the contract. Workers' Compensation insurance in the statutory amount and Employer's Liability coverage in the amount of $500,000 will be required of any CONSULTANT having employees. Evidence of coverage is to be furnished in the form of the Certificate of Insurance. All reports, data and materials ensuing from this project shall be the sole property of the CITY and shall not be reproduced and published without written permission of the CITY. This Request for Proposals does not require the CITY to award a contract or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation of a proposal. The CITY reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals received in response to this request. 4 /7---'1 OUALIFICATIONS The CONSULTANT shall have expertise in refuse rate analysis to include developing rate methodologies and reviewing rates. It is desirable that the principal discipline of the CONSULTANT directly responsible for performing this work be in solid waste rate and regulatory services. The CONSULTANT shall have the ability to make moderately complex issues understandable. Written and verbal communication shall be clear and concise. SELECTION CRITERIA The CONSULT ANT will be selected by a CITY designated Selection Committee. The selection will be based on the written proposal as well as possible interviews by members of the Selection Committee. Subsequent to the interview and after verification that the firm is technically qualified for the project, CITY will offer to negotiate a contract with the successful firm. The following criteria will be used in the evaluation process: I. Applicability of experience to preparation of a Review of Refuse and Recycling Collection Rates. 2. Experience in performing similar work for public agencies. 3. Past record of performance (including control of costs, quality of work and completeness of work in a timely manner). 4. Ability of CONSULTANT, with minimal assistance from CITY staff, to accomplish all the tasks listed in the scope of work. 5. Understanding of the tasks and pertinent State and Federal regulations. 6. Demonstration of broad knowledge of and experience with the area of expertise and the ability to work cooperatively and maintain close coordination with CITY staff and the CONTRACTOR'S representatives. 7. Evaluation of personnel qualifications, including subcontractors if so indicated. 8. Proposed allocation of time to complete the contract and the proposed schedule for completion keyed to expressed specific payment milestones and amounts. 9. Fee estimate and hourly fee schedule. 10. Capacity and resources to perform the work. 5 /?~/tl 11. CONSULTANT's ability, availability and willingness to respond to questions from the public, City staffs, and City Council concerning analysis methodology. 12. Proximity of office to San Diego County. Failure to meet the requirements of any particular non-technical scoring criterion will generally not disqualify a firm's submittal. However, the CITY reserves the right to determine that a firm is not qualified for the project if its response to any single technical evaluation criterion, including the reference check, is determined to be inadequate. The CITY also reserves the right to verify all statements claimed in the proposal submittal and to reject an incomplete or non- responsive proposal. SUBMIT FIVE COPIES OF THE SEP ARA TE TASK AND COST PROPOSALS NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 10, 1993 AT 2:00 p.m. TO: The City of Chula Vista City Manager's Office 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 ATTN: Stephanie Snyder Mark "RFP" in lower left hand comer if submitted in an envelope. Questions can be directed to Stephanie Snyder at (619) 691-5031 or Lyman Christopher at (619) 691-5051. Postmarks and late DroDosaIs will not be acceDted. 6 /7--// CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Meeting Date Item 11109/93 otlYh ITEM TITLE: Industrial Water Policy SUBMITTED BY: Mayor Tim Nader BACKGROUND: At the August 13, 1993 Interagency Water Task Force meeting, I introduced the concept of a "Water Availability Plan for Economic Development" and distributed the attached letter (see Attachment A). At the September 10 meeting I discussed the proposal to assure qualifying businesses an uninterrupted supply of water in more detail. At that time, the IA WTF raised some questions which were addressed on a preliminary basis by staff in a memo to the IA WTF, dated October 7, 1993 (see Attachment B) and distributed to the Task Force at the October 8 meeting. At the October 8 meeting, the IWTF raised additional questions as outlined in staff's memo dated October 9 (see Attachment C). In order to proceed to develop a policy to provide priority treatment to major local businesses and to targeted groups such as Biotech/biomedical and environmental industries, I am recommending that Council endorse the concept of pursuing such a policy, and that Council direct staff to undertake this project as a work item. RECOMMENDATION: That Council direct staff to pursue development of a policy to provide priority water allocation to qualifying industries during times of drought, in order to insure the least possible interruption of water supplies to those industries which would be most impacted and/or are targeted recruitment prospects. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable DISCUSSION: The proposal to develop an industrial water policy stems from a concern regarding the unreliability of water for business operations and the resulting disruptions of existing operations and disincentives for new business to locate here. Additionally, the biotech and biomed industries have identified the need for guaranteed water supplies as a top priority in their site selection process. (Note: The City's High Tech/Biotech Zone Task Force is looking at this issue as part of a targeted incentive package). Water Availability Plan for Economic Development The proposal I made via my letter of August 12 would provide a guaranteed water supply for operational purposes to qualifying businesses. Generally, qualifying businesses would include those with a minimum of 50 jobs and those eligible for the Border Environmental Commerce Zone and/or High Tech/Biotech Zone incentives. The proposal suggests we work with the water provider to assure no net impact on water availability by reducing General Plan density, with certain "exemptions" for qualifying developers. There was inconclusive discussion with the IWTF regarding the feasibility of this proposal. ,2.tJ/'-1 Meeting Date 11/09/93 Item cZ?7 /> Because there is additional staff work needed to research the feasibility of this or a similar policy, I am suggesting that staff work with the water district to bring back a recommendation to Council. IA WTF Ouestions Staff's October 7 memo responds to the questions raised by the IWTF at their September 10 meeting, including: 1) what are the industrial acreage amounts in each water district?; 2) what are typical amounts of industrial water usage?; 3) what are the growth trends for the biotech/biomed industry?; 4) how are other areas, including the City of San Diego, guaranteeing water? As noted, Otay MWD contains approximately 780 vacant industrial acres; Sweetwater Authority contains approximately 145 vacant acres. The City's recent market study projects approximately 5 to 7 acres of annual industrial absorption through 1995 and 10 to 14 acres from 1995 to 2000. In terms of biotech/biomed specifically, there are no acreage projections available; however, the memo notes that most biotech firms are in the latter phases ofR&D and soon to be needing a manufacturing facility, which is one of our "targeted" industries. In terms of water use, it ranges across a broad spectrum, as illustrated by Goldcoast Engineering wit 110 employees and 2,900 gal/day, and Tanabe Pharmaceutical (R&D) with 40 employees and 1 million gal/day. Staff's memo of October 9 outlines the IWTF questions raised at their October 8 meeting, including: 1) is the IWTF being asked to shift water from agriculture to biotech?; 2) is the IWTF being asked to take action independent of other water authorities?; 3) what incentives would the City offer?; 4) what specific water amounts and number and types of firms would be involved?; 5) should priority rights be given to firms using disproportionately high volumes of water? Again, these are policy issues which will require significant staff work in order to prepare a recommendation to Council. FISCAL IMP ACT: Staff time will be required to research, analyze and prepare a recommended industrial water policy. The fiscal impact of the proposed policy would need to be determined as part of the overall analysis to be undertaken by staff. a:indwtr.tn JtJb ;c2 ATTACHMENT A August 12, 1993 MEMO TO: Chair and Members of the Interagency ~at~ Task :z.e Mayor Tim Nader, City of Chula Vi~ ~ ~ FROM: SUBJECT: PROPOSED WATER PRIORITY TO EMPLOYERS As I am sure everybody knows, one of the key barriers we have encountered to attracting new employers to this region, especially those in the high tech/bio tech fields, involves questions as to the availability of water. Businesses have indicated to us that they are hes~ant to open manufacturing operations in an area subject to cyclical drought. If they may be called upon to make cutbacks, we are at a serious competitive disadvantage w~h areas that can assure water supply. I have met with several water officials individually to discuss an outline of a plan to address this issue cooperatively between the City of Chula Vista and the water districts serving us. (Unfortunately, my ability to meet with officials in the Otay Water District has been hampered by Mr. Harron's opinion that the Brown Act must be construed in a way to take priority over the First Amendment, thus discouraging his board members from meeting with me). The basic concept of this proposal is to assure that manufacturers and other employers providing high- qual~y jobs to local residents could be assured, when planning their s~ing decisions, that water cutbacks In periods of drought would not put them at a compet~ive disadvantage for having located here. I believe such a policy is needed in order to strengthen our economic future. The policy would involve the City working in conjunction w~h the water districts to assure that any add~ional burdens which might be placed on local water supplies by implementation of this policy would be offset by e~her the availability of new supplies or by reductions in future development dens~ies as an offset. I believe that ~ is probably well known that Mayor Golding has undertaken to work on a water guarantee plan for businesses in the C~y of San Diego; It would be particularly unfortunate If we were to be left behind in this regard. An outline of a suggested policy is attached for discussion. I may not be able to join you for your August 13 meeting, but would ask for discussion and input from other members of the Interagency Task Force. My hope is that we could develop a plan to bring forward to our respective agencies for a decision In the near future, and that interagency Issues which might arise relative to a water guarantee plan for employers could be worked out before hand through the Interagency Task Force. Thank you in advance for your consideration. TN:pw Encls. deh -3 WATER AVAILABILITY PLAN FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT I. ELIGIBLE BUSINESSES A. Businesses meeting the criteria of the Border Environmental Commerce Zone. B. Businesses meeting the criteria of High Tech/Biotech Zone C. Businesses providing a minimum of fifty full time jobs (or equivalent) at least 80% of the median income of the city, to local residents of at least five years. II. BUSINESSES MEETING ANY ONE OF THE ABOVE THREE CRITERIA WOULD BE GUARANTEED THAT IN TIME OF WATER SHORTAGE THEY WOULD NOT BE ASKED TO REDUCE THEIR USE EXCEPT FOR: A. Reduction of use for ornamental landscaping. B. Reduction of use in time of a dire public emergency (Le. earthquake, terrorist act affecting the water supply). III. WHEN A NEW BUSINESS MEETING THE ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA OF THE ABOVE EXPRESSES INTEREST IN LOCATING IN CHULA VISTA, THE ABOVE POLICY WOULD BE MADE KNOWN TO THAT BUSINESS. IV. The City would work with the water provider to assure there would be no net impact on water availability resulting from the execution of this policy by reducing allowed density under the General Plan in an amount sufficient in the opinion of the water supplier to offset demand generated by new business. V. Developers who attract business to Chula Vista by making their own arrangements to secure water supplies not subject to cutbacks or rationing in time of foreseeable shortage would be exempt from the General Plan density reductions under this program. A developer could also gain relief from density reductions by arranging for direct provision of water to eligible business, or by contributing to water facilities which in the opinion of the city arid water provider would contribute sufficiently to the assurable water supply of the region so as to allow eligible business to be assured of uninterrupted water supply through a natural drought cycle without either reduction in residential density or reduction in use by other water consumers. A:\waterava c1tJ b--= Y ATTACHMENT B MEMORANDUM October 7, 1993 TO: Interagency Water Task Force VIA: Chris Salomone, Community Development Director FROM: Cheryl Dye, Economic Development Manager SUBJECT: Industrial Water Policy At the September 10 Interagency Water Task Force meeting, Mayor Nader presented a proposal to establish a "Water Availability Plan for Economic Development". The proposal called for the development of a policy to assure qualifying businesses an uninterrupted supply of water (for operational purposes). This memo is submitted in response to questions raised by the Interagency Water Task Force at that meeting. BACKGROUND The proposal for an Industrial Water Policy to assure pnonty treatment for select local employers stems from the City's general concern regarding the potential unreliability of water for business operations and specifically, the strong need expressed by the Biotech/Biomed business community. As you know, the Council is actively pursuing recruitment of High Tech, Biotech and Biomed firms. A High Tech/Biotech Task Force is currently developing a targeted incentive package; water reliability has been identified as an essential component by industry representatives such as David Hale, CEO of Gensia; Mary Walker, incoming President of Biocom; and representatives from UCSD CONNECT. In addition to needing guarantees of an uninterrupted water supply, the industry needs assurance of water availability over time. Mr. William Rastetter, CEO of IDEC Pharmaceuticals says "The biopharmaceutical industry needs assurance that there will be adequate water for manufacturing as our companies grow. The demand for our products may increase 35 % per year following product launch. If our water usage is frozen at the previous year's level, we'll have to ration our products!" In regards to industry in general, a 1991 study entitled "Cost of Industrial Water Shortages" by the California Urban Water Agencies, notes "California, more than the other major U.S. industrial centers of manufacturing has an increasingly unreliable water system. Water supply unreliability is one more business problem -- joining air pollution, traffic congestion, and housing costs -- to discourage plant and equipment investment in California . . . Location and expansion decisions depend on a host of criteria -- and water supply reliability has become one of them... The current drought as the harbinger of declining water supply reliability has eroded business confidence... Plant managers believe that production would be at risk in the event of further water shortages. Consequently, some industries are reconsidering plant and equipment investment plans, and in some cases, are looking elsewhere for plant expansions. . . Further c2.tJb-S- Interagency Water Task Force October 7, 1993 Page 2 actions to save water in new ways and new policies to assure adequate water supplies to industry must be eXDected. The prospect of large losses bv California's kev industries due to Door water supDlv reliabilitv dictates the need for innovative solutions." TASK FORCE QUESTIONS The Task Force requested Chula Vista staff to provide information concerning: 1. Amounts of industrial acreage within each water district. 2. Typical industrial water usage. 3. Growth trends for the Biotech/Biomed industry. 4. How other areas are guaranteeing water, including the City of San Diego. The following information is provided: 1. Amount of industrial zoning within each water district. Exhibit 1 lists the industrial areas within each district, and their estimated developed and undeveloped acreage. As the exhibit shows, Otay Municipal Water District includes a total of 1267 industrial acres, of which approximately 780 are vacant; Sweetwater Authority includes a total of 727 industrial acres, of which 145 are vacant. 2. Industry water use. Industrial water uses vary widely by type of industry. The extent to which a plant is negatively affected by water shortage relates, in part, to the way water is used in the plant. Water is used for cooling, sanitation, irrigation and in the manufacturing process. Research shows that plants with high process water requirements are likely to reduce production when faced with water supply shortages and consequently to reduce employment. Some examples of industrial water use are shown below: Company Industry Type # Employees Water Use 1. Rohr Aerospace R & D and 3,500 275,000 gal/day manufacturer 2. Goldcoast Eng. Light manufacturing 110 2,900 gal/day 3. N ellcor Biomed-Manufacturing 312 4,700 gal/day 4. Tanabe Pharmaceutical Biotech R & D 40 1,000,000 gal/day ol.tyb-~ Interagency Water Task Force October 7, 1993 Page 3 (See Exhibit #2 for miscellaneous water use characteristics.) 3. Biotech/Biomed ~rowth. Approximately half of all U.S. biotech/biomed firms are located in California; San Diego is one of the world's four leading biotech centers with approximately 77 biomedical and 116 biopharmaceutica1 (biotech) companies. San Diego area biomed companies currently employ 8,600 people; biotech companies employ over 11,000 (for every manufacturing job - 2.5 spinoff jobs are created). Exhibit 3 discusses biotech/biomed growth. The biotech industry is still in its infancy; most biotech firms are in the latter phases of research and development, at the threshold of manufacturing. As they move to production, their employment increases dramatically at all levels. (Chula Vista is targeting biotech manufacturing.) Statewide sales are projected to jump from $3 billion in 1991 to $75 billion in the year 2000. A 1992 UCSD survey indicated that 50% of local biomed and 20% of local biotech were considering leaving California. The water supply issue is one of the many factors contributing to their dissatisfaction. In terms of overall projected Industrial/R&D absorption within the Chula Vista area, a recent Williams Keubelbeck and Associates study shows 90,000 - 135,000 square feet will be absorbed annually through 1995 and 200,000 - 280,000 square feet annually from 1995 to the year 2000. This translates into 5 to 7 acres and 10 to 14 acres respectively. See Exhibit 4. 4. Water guarantees in other areas. Mayor Golding has pledged that San Diego would guarantee water for Biotech industry. In discussing this issue with the San Diego Economic Development Services Department staff, however, it was indicated that no Council direction had emerged, and no program was being formulated at this time. WPC F:\HOME\COMMDEV.1358.93 oZd.6-? "'C C ctI ...J ctI "i: - t/) ::3 "'C C EXHIBIT "I" " OJ C. o Iii > OJ " c: :J " OJ - '" E :;:; en W en E (J "' "' "' "' "' "' VI VI VI VI en <( OJ OJ OJ OJ "' "' OJ E OJ ~ OJ ~ ~ OJ ~ OJ OJ E ~ ~ " ~ " " ~ " ~ E ~ " (J ~ " " " " " " <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( '" <( <( <( <( ~ 0 0 ~ I"- <( '" - 0 0 CD 0 '" 0 I"- 0 0 0 '" ... '" VI '" ... CD '" '" I"- '" ::> ~ ~ ... I"- ~ '" " .= ~ "' "' en (J "' VI en "' en OJ OJ VI VI VI "' "' OJ ... Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ... OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " E " " " " " <( <( " " " " " <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( <( E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <> 0 '" '" '" U en j co ... VI (J en co <( VI "' "' "' VI VI VI VI E "m E "' VI VI Q) Q) Q) "' Q) Q) Q) Q) E Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) ~ ~ (J ~ " ~ " ~ ~ " " " ~ ~ " " <( " " e <( <( " " " <( <( <( <( " <( <( m <( <( <( <( '" E 0 ... CD 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" -< ~ '" 0 0 0 0 I"- ~ ... 0 N OJ O. ~ OJ ~ '" ... '" N '" > ~ co 1;; C " "C E E " " .c VI en :5 c: VI en VI VI VI VI Q) VI "' en "' VI E 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) E Q) '" Q) ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ " ~ Q) Q) ~ (J <fJ ~ " ~ " " " <( " ~ ~ " " <( " " <( " <( <( <( <( " " <( <( E <( <( I"- <( <( ... co co ... CD CD 0 ~ 0 CD '" N 0 0 I"- '" ;oS c: '" '" ... 0 '" OJ N CD ... N 0 '" "!. 0 N ~ ... '" '" '" I"- "3 ~ .... i --: - CfJ 0 c: t Ii:. '0; ~ " ~ '" 115 :s Q) '" ::;;; Q) w E - Q) ~ " - ~ '" <( c: "C Q) <>IS <( '0; E 0 - E Cii ::;;; - en '" <( ';:: co 0 '" <fJ ~ ';:: ~ m w <fJ Q) -'" v; a: E Q) - ~ '" v; Cii '" ::> '" E c: c: '" Q) :J ';:: co Q) ~ 0 'iij Q) a. ~ " v; ~ " ~ -< 0 <( c: <( c: <( " "' '" ::> :J 1ii '" '" - ~ ;: m <fJ ';:: Cii " '" <9 -?- <fJ " E '" co ';:: >- v; ';:: '" ';:: OJ .c 2 en co v; v; Q) :J 0 v; 0 m ::> c: c: 3: co E a:: 'ii) " :J a:: ~ ::> " :J m E " . co " Q) Iii " '" 'x c: Iii :J .c >- c: 0 c: .c E co 'E .!!2 2~ 0 m - " ~ '5 3: - c: Cii '0; c: '" Q) 3: 0 '" Cii '0 0 - CfJ ~ - o m 0 -'" ii: c: LL 0 a:: > CfJ .g co en " w .c '" 0 f- ~ .c f- m " 11i .c >- >- >- , >- Q) Q) v; '5 , Cii E.c '0 c: c: '" '" '" .c c: co >- 3: Q) .c - E i': '" '" :J a a - :J '" !!? '" 0 ~ 0 :J 0 0 Ea::: w CfJ 0 CfJ 0- m ...J CfJ CfJ f- -= ~ "' E "C E i5 " 0 0 "''' ~ 0 " ~ Q) ~ >- 'U " - Q) - ,!11 ;; (J '" - ';:: :;: c: ~ '" 0 " ~ .c '" co ... - m !J ~ Cii '" " c: <( 5 'C C. '" -< " ... '0 " ~ E Q) .c Q) 'c ';:: - 0 ~ '" '" Q) '" co " E 3: m ::;;; '" " ~ Q) >- " >- Q) m .c '" Cii 3: 0 f- a 0 CfJ . : ... o LL " co en o c. o ... a. " co ... '" E :;:; en W z. Oi .;: ... gJ...J "" c: SN o f- <( - " - c ... ~ 02tJb -g/ FIGURE 4-4b Typical In.take. Use Profile EXHIBIT "2" ,. ot Total Intake Water 100 80 Industry 60 265 Paperboard 283 Drugs 284 Soap 285 PaInts 327 Concrete 40 20 o 265 283 284 285 327 .. Process ~8oiler o Cooling .. Sani!. & Irrig. Source: Survey Question 11.3 Speotrum Eoon"....".. Sept. I1i1g1 FIGURE 4-4d Typical Intake Use Profile SIC Code Industry ,. of Total Intake Water 344 Fabricated Metals 372 Aircraft 376 AerospsC{j 60 10 50 40 30 20 o 344 372 376 _ Process .. Boiler o Cooling .. Sani!. & Irrig. Source: Survey Intake 11.3 0267b-'1 Speoff1.lm EO"",,",I"I. Ino. Sept. 1991 w w >- o ...J Q.>- ::Eoe( wo z(!) Oz cnl-f= ..J-g~ wOw ...JOQ. aJa:O oe(Q...... I-a:cn wz Q.O w...J cn...J =>oe( a:(!) w I- oe( :: m "0 '" "" W :ij ~a: " ''3; "S, ~.J::, ') OW -0 <nO o ~ o o <n m - r::: ,ca c:: ;0 ;o.:_g "~ '" o OW -0 <nO o 'U) ,CD '" ~ ~s;::g~ ~:e~m coc>coC)cog ~..~~r;;..,. '" co , CD '" ~ :egJ~;1;~:g(Dt:;g:a; t") <OOC\,l""tNoan.... <0 CO ..,. C\I (\j '" CD '" ~~:3~::f a; ~ ::r N :.<: CDOMMNU')NN(") ~r;;:gg~~$~(X) '" '" '" <D .,.,. '" "- '" <D '" '" <'.I IN ...... CD ~ ~ ~ (X) ...., I'- t'- 1'-"'" ...., <ON "<t'1.O::M ...... U') N co> CO iN (") N N (\,! '" '" <> <\I ..... C\i CD CD '" ~ 8W2~a:>~~~~~~:gg](O~ ...... CO) m N m MOO ~ .... .... .... N en ...... M (\/ '"'''-''' N ,.... C\I .... '" <0 '" '" m '" . '" '" ., '" ~~~~2<D~CD~~~gr;;:-g gNU') <\l 0...... Ill) ...,. ..,. N ., ., <D '" '" C'~ ~~ "- ~ ~ ., - '" ~.,'" l"'J ~~~ <> :6 ;J, '" '" '" ~ & o U) <0 '" ~ O)co~t--.<D(1) ~~ m~", ~ '" '" '" ., '" '" '" <D . g~~~re~~::ro ""<O~O)I.OC\I co CD '" ~ "''''.,~ ~~~;1;'" gs~N<r-~..,.<oU')....:e N co <r- ...... ..,. ~~~:~~~~~ '" <0 '" ~ :g~ '" CDQOCD 1.0 C\I ,..... co 0> 0> <D "- :8~~~~ ::r<D..,.wc; :1:3"'''' "''''~:s; '" '" ~~ g:~~~~~ C\i .... N ..." <0 <0 '" ~ ~~"":~~~g~~~~~~U; ...... C? en C\I (\j' ...... M U') C\.I ...... C\I ..,. ~ 0> CD '" ~ to <0 (7) M C'\I ~~N~~~ "- ~ ~C?<D"""C\I~ ~ f::: U') ~ ~ ~ ~ :D '" a; :? > .. ., ~ .!! ~ g gu:'8 '8'2- _ 0. ,0. 2: ~ - .. .. :i: ~ ~ :::;0.'" '8 Q: 'i U c 52 .. !!! ~ g'u. ~ g ~ - "':::; ~ ~ ~ '" u 0 ..'E .,,~ ~ CD () 0 ~.2 ~'B~ 8~ ia:~ 'O,E ~~a: :0 tD < E ota o-cs~ e ~ $') II') 4) 4)~ociE~ a.u:J~(ijQ) ~ciS(1)a..Q.. '8 Q: ~~g .. '" co ...... CD ..... C\I to to U') a; c ti ci. I%) OJ 3Eoci O:"8M-5~S EQ:4DCJ"eClg :Jcu,!:!UJcied ~Gi8~E!!!~ CJ~-a;ii8ocu ~i.....Q u::c..o. _ CD C C CZ) iiC'G'5:Jo>.;z:: o.2a.E....o:! c.cEEo_o"_ o co 0 0 ~ OlJ..oow~< ~~~fJ~re~rerere~~ olc:Y); -/tfJ ~!idj rD;::~~ ~C)C)C) '" '" '" '" <> '" '" '" .. c u 0 c% ~ => ~.,o ;>- ~o.~ :::; . => 'i ~ (/) :s! ~~ => ..C o>c; ui - .. <> -" (,j u " o (/) ~ u 'E " c " u w E 2 ~~ 0.0> <ne; EXHIBIT "2" (continued) Ernst & Young 501 W.Broadway# 1200 San Diego. CA 92101 EXHIBIT "3" Page 1 of 4 CONNECT UCSD Extended Studies 0176 La Jolla. CA 92093-0176 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE September 21, 1993 Contact::. Maggie Watkins Ernst & Young (619)525-1383 Barbara Bry UCSD/CONNECT (619) 534-6330 SURVEY FINDS GROWl'll CONTINUES IN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOMEDICAL INDUSTRIES SAN DIEGO -- Results of the annual survey conducted by Ernst & Young, an international professional services firm, and CONNECT, the UCSD Program in Technology and Entrepreneurship, reveal that there is strong and continuous growth in San Diego in the biotechnology and biomedical fields. The survey found that there are now 116 biotech companies and 77 biomed companies active in San f ')1ft Diego. These companies employ approximately 20,000 people. Some of the biotech ., firms formed in the last year include Genset, Cosmederm Technologies, Ontogen, PRIZM Pharmaceuticals, Signal Pharmaceuticals, Neurocrine Bi9sciences, Inc. and Sequana Therapeutics. Some of the new biomed companies founded in the last / twelve months include CyberRx, Dominator Radiology Systems, FemCap and -to! i,l Medical Optics, Inc. IJU J)'/1 "What is apparent about these start-ups is that they are exceptionally well financed and have recruited strong management teams. These companies are similar to the well-financed and managed companies founded several years ago, many of whom are now the cornerstones of the local industry," said Ray Dittamore, Managing Partner of Ernst & Young's San Diego office. "From a long- term point of view, this is very encouraging for our community." yt f:/ ;'</ The biotech CEOs who responded to the survey indicated they planned to hire over 1,000 new employees in the next year. 46% of the CEOs responded that they frequently hire local college graduates, citing science as the preferred educational background. The biomed CEOs who responded projected approximately 600 new jobs in the next year, but only 15% said they regularly hire from local colleges and universities. Of those CEOs, 28% look for students with degrees in sales and marketing followed by science (26%) and business (19%). -more- c2CJ6 -II - EXHIBIT "3" Page 2 of 4 Ernst & Young and CONNECT San Diego's Annual Biotechnology Survey Page Two of Two September 21, 1993 q..., The survey also pointed out that local biotechnology and biomedical companies are looking to alternative financing strategies to fund their companies. 68% of the biotech CEOs expect to be involved in a strategic alliance in the next twelve months. Of the biomed CEOs responding, 59% said there was a greater chance that they would be involved in an alliance in the next year. "Today the venture capitalists and other private markets are being very selective in the companies they choose to invest in. As a result, biotech and biomed companies are looking to alliances as a means of gaining access to new capital resources:' noted CONNECT Director William Otterson. "In addition, through these partnerships, companies can gain access to new markets and enhance the marketing, distribution and sales of their products." The survey also showed that mergers and acquisitions were also expected to be on the rise in the coming year. The survey probed the CEOs' thoughts on the local political leadership's performance with respect to the biotechnology industry. 89% of the biotechnology CEOs and 73% ofthe biomedical CEOs rated the performance either as improved or unchanged in the last twelve months, while only 11% of the biotech and 27% of biomed CEOs believe their performance has declined. "The local leadership, spearheaded by Mayor Susan Golding, has taken a more proactive position with respect to accommodating and facilitating growth within the industry:' said Dittamore. When the CEOs were asked about their suggestions to the Clinton Health Care Reform Task Force, an overwhelming number indicated the need to speed up the FDA approval process for biomedical products and to eliminate any consideration of the imposition of drug or device price controls by the federal government. ##### Ernst & Young is a leading international professional services firm with 67,000 people in more than 600 offices in over 100 countries, including 23,000 people in more than 100 United States cities. CONNECT was formed in 1985 as a university-private sector partnership to serve the needs of high tech entrepreneurs by linking them with the technical, managerial and financial resources they need for success. c2t?b -/0<. o ~ o ~ ;(Q\. '00 i~.' ~ =" ~~ I "~ ?~;,; Ii ~i'f . ~. CI.J ....... c:: Q) -; ~ s ; ~ S ::....... o Q) ~~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~~ CI.J ....... ....... ~ u ..c :: ~~ ~ c. !~.tJl;f fllllli =:......x::. i;~( (i~':' '....:;;: ''!;OJ ;;Q)\ i5;( ;:10;' ......:::::: ~; :;;"{:;(~~~f:;,;: <~;::;::{::::;;:;;.:. ~;,-)!!i!!!i!?i:::~ -';"-"::::.:,',-:-:;-," :::_'-',:,,::,,:-,-, '{~I!;!!~!i!!li;!;,::;; ~ ~ :: o Q) ~~. ~~ tj SO:: CI.J......."C Q) c:: 0 J: Q) ~ ....... S c. .~ c. ~ ....... 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ii J: > ~~ - ~ ;> Q '- C. C. < .... - = 5 ~ .... S ~.5 c. C"IU.s .-I.~ ~ ;> '- ~ ~Q 02.tJo - /;? - ~.~ ~ I/) .5 ;.. .-I_~ U EXHIBIT "3" Page 3 of 4 ..... - = ~ ~ "Q .::! E Q~ OJ:) C. 0\ L.__ ::: ::: CIJ 0" ~ 1:1:) = 1:1:) ~ ~ "Q .... (.j ...~ (.j E \Q .~ - ;;""0 .c ~ ~ .c (.j ~ ; o ~ ~ ~ CI:: J~ j~ .u ~. ~~ 0....... ~ c: o ~ 5 ~~ n""" ~ ~. c.Q,) 5 = Q,) Q,) n'5 - .... = = .- Q,) 0() t = = .C ~ .- =~ o = nO o OJ) "0 = .- Q,) = - = c.~ 0_ ~c. n= = 0 ~ n e f ~ ~ o ~ == ; e - tf.) ~ Q) ~ .- .- r::: r:---."t:I~ r:---. Q) Q.. g e ._ 0 ~u " EXHIBIT "3" Page 4 of 4 - '" ~~\O a,> ....... =C'I~ ~t) .... '" ---.'=' .- ..<:: ... C'I ~ ..<::- ~ 00 ~ g ~ 6 o!I~ -0<'1 .J~ a,>- - - Cd X .~ ~ . ~.S ';~C'I '-" =C'lt' .............. ""'i ...C'I..... ~ ..... ~ OJ)f:I.) o Q.) - .- o = \C r::: ~ ,...j ..= Q.. ,...j C'.J = ~ 0 .s u ~ 02{)~ -pI EXHIBIT "4" '" 00 ~8\O ~8- ~8\O 0 8rJ o "'" o - o - .0 .0 .0 N 0 o - V) - V) - , Ng NV) ..,'" 0 0 .N - '" a- N .., 0 .; N - - -oS g:! ~O("t) ~O- ~OV') to '" <:<8"'" <:<8- <:<g- EO C:o ON g. ",N 0 o - '" - '" - , 0 N~ NS ..,Qt. - EO N 00 N N '" ..,8 ,. .; '" ON ,. Q ;..m u Q<< -00 g;g ~O- ~ .~ o(!l:Qf;oJ ..,g <:<g"'" g- '" Q:;::r:~ ON to -N g- O - NO '" -!;E-< u , NO .,; U ..,'" 0 0 -0 k1 ~of;oJ a- 0 00 c:..; a- .; .., .., '" ~m:':: 0- b~ 0() .... '" ~f;oJ~ - .., '- .., II") Q..", 0.., f:i !a Q - - ~8<'1 ~ . m::r:::; <:> '" 8:!3 o N 'C: '" to ;> ;IE-< N '" .0 00-. '" - 0 V) - o - -"'>. '" .., QQ:;< , _0 N .~O.~ :c .., <'1 & V) ;.; ZOE-< 0- ~ "'" ..c:gu '" '" ~,",m 0- <'1 C 4.) en u E-< QZ> - - 8.:-S'E '- c ~o< ='~.....V) '" '-' t;E..J N r- ~r- ~N -0 0", "'to ~ 0 ..,....-0 r--:~ 000 ~ccnc: -- f;oJ ;I ~ .<'1 .S c.; - r- - V) - ro 4.) ~.- -'Q:;::r: , <'1 _V) NS -::-se-s ~~ 00 0 - OOu 00 \0 00 N c: 0 .., ;:t '" '" Q:;mQ - a- .; r~ '" 0-.....0 Q..I:QZ - '",-oEb;, '" '" '"' << - u..,o. u';;: N ~"Oca"O u <'1 ()Q- ()QOO '0' C (.) (l) '" 00 ';::0;:1 < '" <'1 <'1<'1 ","0 ~:::Iea v . a- .00 o..eOOO '" N N - o - h"" , NiB NrJ < ..,'C: 5 u 0 N . '" ~ r- \0 - o'(j!aEo "'-", N ~ ~ ~ u_ ~ tI').~- '" '" -< < :!: -< ;3: ..,..c: bO ~~ ~ ~ ~ 5 c: .c- <'1 ~,.-,V) aJb.QO.c Q'" ~'" V) ~ '" !at;:;-o~ 0;:I~ ~"'" >'N~ N": ~. ~~~ ~ "'~ . g ~~!a Ct:;'"' c:@> c:@> 1:Qc:@> . c: @> _ EO 00 o:9.oE -'" 0 0 '0 ""- ;.. .",-0 .'" -0 0.",-0 en .'" -0 NOU]= ",E === E-< e-.~ >. e-.!:: ~ e-.!:: .... e- ~ ' 0'- C1) o ._ M~aJ> ~=:: ct1Z ~:::I - 0 '" 00'" ~o", ~ ~ a';;; c:"'o- ~E 2" "'" '. cu =>.c g" "'.0 .., =,EcT - -'" !a 0-< i:t:: 8<~ - -< .., ....=c..~ ., ., E<~ 0. i:t:: -'" cEg~OD '<:: .gw",'" ...."'.., 0.- <> "'- .., .9 '" eno"'~ O",bO ","'bO u~bO t.r.Ic= co '" ... ..,c'" u"'''' . c: '" co!! :: ""'''' _ c:.., - C.., ~ c:.., <>C:t 0..... ca v.I 03 e- ~"C:!) .... '" < !) = ~!) .- e..... Q.) af;oJ<< "'~ < -- ~ < .~<< U (1)E ~8 - .., I:Q ~ ~.. ;> ~ ~.. '" .., .~~~ ~ ::E Q ~.. ~~'" '. '" .sEE=, S-ge= c!:.o::E '" ::: Z....= .... = <. < ..,c =o.<>C =::E<>c bO<>C '" ..... <>~ rJ5e<~ .c >c <>~ --~,....., .55 0 m< U. << . < -N("t)~ ~........---~ - N N , a- N \0 c2!Jb -/3 /;01>-11:, <'1 ~ N ATTACHMENT C Memorandum To: Sidney Summers, Senior Management Assistant cc: Sid Morris, Assistant City Manager Cheryl D. Dye, Economic Development Manag{!JIJ From: Date: October 9, 1993 Subject: Industrial Water Policy/Mayor's Proposal to Interagency Water Task Force As you know, the Mayor presented the attached proposal to the IWTF at their August 13, 1993 meeting. Sid Morris requested that the EDC chairman and I attend as resources for questions. The IWTF had questions which were addressed in the attached memo dated, October 7, 1993 and submitted to the IWTF on October 8. The Mayor was not in attendance at the October 8 meeting. The IWTF raised the following questions concerning his proposal: 1. It is anticipated that issues regarding agricultural water use will be raised soon with the County Water Authority. One issue relates to their need to know what the price of water will be "over the next five years"(for both row crops and tree growers). Is the IWTF being asked to look at shifting water resources from agriculture to biotech? 2 Is the IWTF being asked to take action as independent water authorities - i.e., independent of the CWA and MWD? 3. If the City is proposing that some type of incentive be provided for high water users, is the City willing to provide the same companies an incentive related to sewer rates? What other City incentives would apply to these same qualifying firms? 4. Under the proposed program, what are the specific water amounts and specific number and types of firms involved? ..20b -/? 5. Is it appropriate to ensure priority rights to firms using disproportionately high volumes of water per employee (as is the case with biotech)? It should also be noted that Mr. Lewinger of Otay Water District posed a concept whereby agriculture companies would pay cheaper water rates during non-drought times in return for discontinued water use during drought times. This would potentially allow industry to benefit from guaranteed water during drought - in return for paying higher rates during non-drought times. While potentially a creative solution, this scenario raises numerous questions of a political, administrative, and economic nature. The answers to the questions raised by the IWTF will need to be framed within the context of City policy decisions. I understand that in light of the fact that City policy is involved and that significant staff time will be required to fully pursue an industrial water policy, it will be recommended to the Mayor that this item be taken to Council for direction to staff. Please let me know if any further action is needed from Community Development or if you have any questions. CLD/ak c: \dye \memos\ water.ffiem 2 cJCJb-jg/ CAPITOL OFFICE: STATE CAPITOL P,O. BOX 942849 SACRAMENTO, CA 94249.0001 (916) 445-7210 FAX: (916) 324.7895 DISTRICT OFFICE 1080 UNIVERSITY AVENUE SUITE H-201 SAN DIEGO, CA 92103 (619} 294-7600 FAX' 1619) 294-2348 J\ssemhl~ (!Inl ifnruin 1fiegislnhtre MIKE GOTCH COMMmEES, CHAIR, LOCAL GOVERNMENT VICE CHAIR, NA rURAL RESOURCES HEALTH MEMBER OF THE ASSEMBLY 76TH DISTRICT October 25, 1992 00 =i=i w..._ -<-< ::0 00 ~ m ,""f1 mo (") ::U:r N [T1 ~c: \0 ,-,..,r. < o:r~. ;e m '1"__ """0'~" - 0 O-~ W m:xo- ex> The Honorable Tim Nader CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader: I wanted to let you know that my Assembly Bill 1332, regarding vehicles used for ur . ion, was recently signed by the Gover n will take effect January , 94. This bill aut zes the County of San Diego and each of its ci' to adopt ordinance establishing a five-year pilot program ich implements procedures for declaring any motor vehicle a pub c nuisance when the vehicle is used in the commission of an act 0 prostitution. The ordinance may include procedures to enjoin d abate the declared nuisance by authorizi emporary As you may know, Portland and Detroit have similar ordinances and the results have been remarkable. Prostitution and related crimes have dropped dramatically, and in some areas, virtually disappeared. Under the Red Light Abatement Law, every building used for prostitution can be deemed a nuisance and enjoined and abated. This bill recognizes that if vehicles are subject to the same procedures, street prostitution would be vastly curtailed. I believe implementation of this law serves the best interests of the local business owners and citizens of our community. I urge the City to implement it as soon as possible. For your reference I have enclosed a copy of the bill. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. ;;;;:re~ MIKE GOTCH Enclosure cc: City Council Members Chief Richard Emerson [C. !f;~ . ~~ eLl) c ?2~~ ,~,) . . '7{C~~ G~ ,r)JJL-~~~~ '-/ ~ c2/a.--/ Pnnted on Recycled Paper