HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1983-11259
RESOLUTION NO. 11259
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AN ASSIGNMENT OF AN
AGREEMENT WITH SEDWAYjCOOKE FROM THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, recognizing
the problems and issues identified in the attached application for Coastal Zone
Management Grant, desires to provide for a planning study contributing to improved
coastal planning, decisionmaking, and management capability related to community
development and growth; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has developed
an application package to deal with these development problems and issues; and the
California State Office of Planning and Research, under authority of the Government
Code of the State of California (Section 34200), may provide planning assistance for
such a program and receive financial assistance from the California Coastal Commission,
as authorized by inter-agency agreement; and,
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista has
authorized the assignment of said agreement to the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista hereby requests the State Coastal Commission to provide planning
assistance under authority of the Government Code of the State of California, with
such financial assistance as may be provided by the California Coastal Commission,
not to exceed the amount $28,800.00. Such planning assistance is more particularly
described in a project description that is attached hereto and made a part of this
resolution as if fully set forth herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
be, and he is hereby authorized and empowered to execute in the name of the City of
Chula Vista, all necessary applications, contracts, and agreements and amendments
hereto to implement and carry out the purposes specified in this resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is authorized to execute
the attached agreement accepting the assignment of the Agency's interest in the
SedwayjCooke agreement.
Presented by
pau~~mmunrC
Development Director
Approved as to form by
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this
24th
day of
May
19
83
, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Councilmen
Scott, Cox, Malcolm, Moore, McCand1iss
None
NAYES:
CounciZmen
ABSTAIN: CounciZmen None
ABSENT: Councilmen None
ATTEST
Mayor
/)
W.M;~) <<,.iudM~
Deputy City Clerk
{2.(l
e City of Chula Vista
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 'OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
)
)
)
55.
I, PATRICIA A. GUARDACOSTA, DEPUTY CITY CLERK of the City of Chu La Vista,
California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a fuZZ, true
and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO.
11259
and
that the same has not been amended or repeaLed.
DATED
jJd~~!l ~~
Deputy City Clerk
(SEAL)
:;-660 (pag)
Yl..K::i'l' AJVl.t;l\lUlvl.I:;l".JT TV
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
The Agreement between the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA and SEDWAY/COOKE, dated November 4, 1982,
is amended in the following respects:
1. All rights of the Redevelopment Agency of the City
of Chula Vista (the "Agency") are hereby assigned to the City
of Chula Vista (the "City). City agrees to said assignment and
Sedway/Cooke (the "Consultant") consents to such assignment.
2. Appendix "A" attached hereto, captioned "Chula Vista
Bayfront Local Coastal PIan Preparation Work Program", is incor-
porated within the Agreement as an integral part thereof.
3. Appendix "B" attached hereto, captioned "Federal Require-
ments of Credits and Conditions, Fair Employment Practices and
Federal Contract Conditions", is incorporated within the Agreement
as an integral part thereof.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA
Dated:
May 24
, 1983
!Ie
OX, CHAI N
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Dated:
May 24
, 1983
K{l
~_ \ \ ~ t;9
OX, MAYOR
SEDWAY/COOKE
May 26
, 1983
BY'~ J) ~~()
.. . SEDWAY, ESIDENT
Dated:
;f!-11259'
8.Q - -424
CHULA VISTA SA YFRONT
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM PREPARATION
WORK PROGRAM
LAND USE PLANNING
I. REVIEW AND DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING AND PROJECTED
CONDITIONS
The purpose of this task is to provide 0 valid and up-to-date working basis for the
progrom. The prior documentati9n of conditions by Sedway/Cooke will be updated
to ensure that all new physical and functional conditions ore considered.
1.1 Ownership Pattern. The chonging pattern of land ownership ond long-term
leases must be token into account from severol standpoints, including existing and
anticipated land uses. (City to provide).
1~2 Geologic Soils Dato. In order to assess the suitability of land for 0 range of
uses, more detailed interpretation of previously mode soil borings must be made.
Seismic vulnerability also will be assessed.
1.3 Sewer and WoJer FociJities. The extent and level of service for sewer and
water purposes will be identified, and any new constraints on such servic::e will be
identified. The future plans and needs fOT extension of service -will be reviewed,
and any capacity constraints will be noted.
1.4 Roadway and Traffic Conditions. Although there ore few improved roadways in
the area, several major circulation improvements ore contemplated, notably the 1-
54 connection and potential new trolley station at E cnd H Streets. These plans will
be reviewed and circulation needs projected.
1.5 Land Uses. The current uses of the land area, including facilities ond 011 non-
structural activities (e.g. agriculture) will be reviewed. The condition and general
age of structures will also be noted. (City to provide).
APPENDIX A
:t2- \l~<)9
on bird habitats have been undertaken, culminating recently in the Jones and Stokes
reconnaissance and field investigations in the area. The viability and the value of
the range of marshes, ponds, and grassland areas will be reevaluated providing on
important opportunity for achieving consensus on this critical aspect.
1.7 Physical-Visual Attributes. The perception of the study area will be important
to its ultimate use. Many physical liabilities and negative visual attributes ore
associated with the area, which will hove to be overcome. Equally important, the
many visual assets, often obscured and unnoticed, should be exploited. To be noted
will be entry points, visual clutter, disruptive visual elements, landmarks, views,
etc.
2. PLANS/pROGRAMS RECONNAISSANCE AND WORK PROGRAM REFINEMENT
The purpose of this task is to make further contact with key- participants and secure
their input on major issues and work program responses.
2.1 Review 011 prior plan documents and reports to ensure that 011 issues hove been
adequately identified.
2.2 Review initial work program and revise as necessary to reflect any new
findings on land use, natural resources, circulation, economic/fiscal, urban design,
public utilities/services, and other factors.
2.3 Review 011 Coastal Commission legislation, administrative guidelines, etc. to
ensure adequacy of final program. Meet with Coastal Commission stoff to clarify
needs.
2.4 Review the related plans, programs, EISs, and other pertinent documents of the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, ColT rans, Port of Son Diego, Notional City and any
ather involved local, district, county, state, or federal agency, including those of
Chula Vista.
2.5 Reevaluate and revise overall work program based on any new Issues or
findi:1gs.
2
. .;.. . .
3. FORMULATE LAND SUIT ABILITY ANALYSIS
A land suitability analysis, based on updated and detoiled information, will identify
those lands which ore suitable for development, those which sho~ld be totally
preserved in on open state for habitat protection purposes, those natyral features
cnd attributes which ore well 'suited for public recreation use, and those areas
essential for public facilities, roodwoys, storm drainage, and other public structures
and systems.
3.1 Prepare 0 current base mop at 0 suitoble scale.
3.2 Identify areas which ore committed to public use or purpose, areas unsuitable
or moderotely suitoble for development due to soils, natural habitat, or current use,
and areas fully suitable for development.
33 For lands partially or fully suitable for development, determine possible
constraints on type of use or limitations on building siting and design, os well as
needed adverse impact-mitigating systems.
4. INITIAL LAND USE ANALYSIS
The initial land use analysis, to be modified during the option preparation process
(below) is intended to determine the range and types of land uses which could and
should be accommodated in the Boyfront area. This initial determinoti?n will
reflect preexisting local planning policy, Coastal Act policies and guidelines, and
likely market conditions in the area.
4.1 Compile the relevant local, regional and state policies acting as determinants
of the type and location of land uses.
4.2 As needed, meet with developers and owners to determine their views on
development markets proposed to be entered.
4.3 Relate the findings of these surveys ond analyses to the available developa~le
si t es.
3
t<- l\9-rq
5. FORMLt.A TE OPTIONS
The analysis of land suitability and projected land uses will be combined in 0 series
of options, each of which is considered feasible.
5.1 A preliminary consideration of suitability patterns and projected land uses will
be undertaken to suggest the major determinants of the options.
5.2 After a review of feasible and complementary uses and sound relationships
among uses/subareas, three options will be prepared with characteristics so
described such that each is clearly identifiable and that logical comparisons and
choices can be made among them.
6. EVALUATION OF OPTIONS
This task will provide far a comparative assessment of the options.
6.1 Undertake 0 comprehensive assessment of options. Among the considerations
will be those dealing with access and circulation, wildlife and vegetation habitat
preservation, effects on hydrology and drainage, public services and utilities
requirements and provision, development costs and consistency with local and
Coastal Commission policy.
6:l. Overall general costs of development including land preparation and on-site and
off-site improvements will be formulated.
6.3 A special study of the fiscal impact of alternatives will be undertaken. This
will be based on the preliminary cost and timing estimates of camponents of the
plans, and determinations on most likely methods of financing city improvements,
including available and anticipated tax increments.
6.4 Estimate the financing costs likely to be associated with funding additionally
required public expenditures and paying off outstanding obligations for the options.
6.5 Present options with a description of the irr:- ;ications to the Chula Vista City
Council for review and comments.
4
7. DETERMINATION OF PREFERRED PLAN
This task is intended to define the selected plan, or the combination of c'omponents
which will constitute the final plan.
7.1 Based on meetings with officials and interested parties, the final plan will be
prepared, to contain: overall development and conservation objectives;
specification of permitted land uses and related conditions; transportation proposals
with rights-of-way, roadway and trolley station requirements; provisions for public
access to bay front areas by foot and bicycle; parking requirements for private and
public use; open spoce proposals including lands to be retained for wildlife habitat
ond land and water areas for recreational use; and urban design proposals
establishing criteria and standards for high quality design.
7.2 Undertake a final testing of fiscal implications of the selected plan and
development program, reflecting final costs and alternative methods of financing,
estimote additional revenues to be generated, and prepare final finoncial pro forma
and report identifying the costs and revenues to the City.
7.3 Prepare final report.
IMPLEMENTATION AND RELATED DOCUMENTATION (Optional)
8. FORMULATE PHASE III (LCP IMPLEMENTATION) PROGRAM
Based on ossuronces by the Coastal Commission, the following work is based on the
ass~mption that a specific plan will be utilized to carry out the mandates of the
state law as the prerequsite for local authority over coasta~ development.
8. I Confirm the scope of the requisite specific plan, and document all
requirements from the State Planning and Zoning Law.
8.2 Amplify the land use plan, to include: a proceaure for project reVIew and
approval, additional ston.-1ards relating to smaller-scale development and design,
and cO:1servation practices ond management proctices, thereby deriving a specific
plan.
5
?- t I 9- rq
8.3 Relate the specific plan to the Chula Vista Zoning Ordinance by p~eparing local
"enc.oling" provisions in that ordinance to accommodate and cross-reference the
specific plan.
8.4 Prepare finol specific plan.
9. PREP ARE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
As on adjunct to the modification of local regulations by the specific plan, on
amendment must be mode to the General Plan.
9.1 Review the General Plan and assess the status of General Plan amendments for
the year.
9.2 Note the appropriate categories to accommodate the land use plan and Specific
Plan in the General Plan.
9.3 Prepare graphic and textual modifications to the Chula Vista General Plan.
MEETINGS
The consultants will meet with city officials and other involved parties to review
memoranda and reports, not to exceed four meetings. At the completion of Task 5
an evening or Saturday morning workshop will be held to review the optional plans
and their evaluation. Meetings also will be held with city and other stoff os
necessary to complete the work in a responsive and logical form and manner.
PRODUCTS
The consultant will produce the following reports:
(HULA VISTA BAYFRONT LCP: OPTIONS AND EVALUATION
(HULA VISTA BAYFRONT: DRAFT PLAN
CHV.....A VISTA SAYFRONT: FINAL PLAN
All materials will be submitted in camero-ready form.
6
So-EDULE OF COMPLETION
All worK witt be completed within seven months of commencement. This assumes 0
four week. period for council review, selection and refinement. 'In-"the event the
Council wishes to hove more time, the schedule would be delayed accordingly.
BUDGET
The following is the budget breakdown for the effort up to and inclUding the Draft
Plan. Work on the Final Plan will be on 0 time and materiols bosis, not to exceed
S 10,000 due to the undefined scale of possible changes.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Sedway/Cooke
Gruen Gruen + Associates
Engineer/Soils Analyst
Jones and Stokes
Robert Conradt
Toto IS\:Ibcontractors:
Total Professional Services:
$64,000
$1 7,000
S 8,000
S 5,000
$ 4,000
$34,000
$98,000
DIRECT COSTS
Trovel Costs
Telephone, Reproduction
Totol Direct Costs:
TOTAL BUDGET:
$ 7,000
$ 5,000
$12,000
$110,000
IMPLEMENTATION (Optional)
Work on the implementation aspects will cost $20,000.
7
~ - \ \ ~ -s-ct
FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS OF CREDITS AND CONDITIONS,
FAIR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES AND FEDERAL CONTRACT CONDITIONS
CO'lFLIcr OF INTEREST
Pursuant to the California Coastal Commission Conflict of Interest Code, the
Contractor or its employees may be subject to the provisions of the California
Political Reform Act of 1974, wnich (1) requires such persons to disclose
financial interests that may foreseeably bernaterially affected by the war
performed under this Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons from making or
participating in making decisions that will foreseeably financially affect such
interests.
TRAVEL Nm mSCEUANECU3 EXPEl'EES
The Grantee shall be reimbursed for travel and per diem of its employees, and
for other necessary expenses at cost, when invoiced in accordance with the
provisions of the "Cost and payrrent" section, and within the arrount ShCMn in the
project budget. Travel and per diem reimbursement shall not exceed the rates
allowable for state employees under the Rules of the State Board of Control, as
amended fran tiIr,e to time.
CREOI1S AND CITATICN:>
The cover or title page of any publication resulting from this Agreement shall
include the following credit:
This publication was prepared with financial
assistance from the u.S. Office of Coastal Zone
Management, National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, under the provisions of the
Federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972,
as amended, and from the California Coastal Com-
mission under the provisions of the Coastal Act
of 1976.
Reasonable credit for the Contractor's work shall also be permitted on such
publications.
FAIR El1PWYHB-IT PMcrrcES ADDENCUM
The attached "Fair Emp1~nt Practices Addendum" 1S an integral part of this
Agreerrent.
FCDERl\L GRJI,NT CONDITIGS
Because this AgrecTCnt is partially funded from National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration Grant No. 04-7-158-44045, it is subject
to all conditions of that grant, and, in particular, the following;
~... (I~)~
APPENDIX B
FEDERAL GRANT CONDITI0N3 (continued)
o Nondiscrimination. The Contractor assures that the work carried out
under this Agreement will be conducted in compliance with Title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-4) and the requirements
imposed by the regulations of the Department of Commerce (30 Fed. Reg.
305; 15 CFR Part 8) issued pursuant to that Title, applicable and
appropriate to the work supported by this Agreement. To ensure
non-discrimination, the attached "Statement of Assurances is an integral
part of this Agreement.
o Officials Not to Benefit. No member or delegate to Congress or resident
Federal Commissioners shall be admitted to any share or part of this
Agreement or to any benefit that may arise therefrom.
o Access to Records and Right to Audit. The Contractor agrees that the
Comptroller General of the United States or any of his duly authorized
representatives, the Secretary of Commerce or any of her duly authorized
representatives and the duly authorized representatives of the California
Coastal CamrrUssionshall, until the expiration of three years after
expenditure of the Federal funds under this Agreement, have access to and
the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and
records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Agreenent.
The Contractor agrees that payment(s) made under this Agreement shall be
subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the
basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this
Agreement. 1ne Contractor shall refund the necessary amount by check pay-
able to the California Coastal Commission.
o Maintenance of Records. All required records shall be maintained until an
audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved or
three years after the termination of this Agreement, whichever is sooner.