HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1986/04/01 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Tuesday, April 1, 1986 Council Chamber
4:00 p.m. Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Cox; Councilmembers Malcolm, Moore,
Scott, McCandliss (arrived late)
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Goss, Assistant City Manager
Asmus, Assistant City Attorney Gill
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed
by a moment of silent prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meetings.of March 3 and 25, 1986.
MSUC (Moore/Scott) to approve the minutes.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
IMPACT OF CONVENTION CENTER CONSTRUCTION COSTS ON EXISTING
PORT DISTRICT PROJECT - Port Commissioner Phil Creaser
Mayor Cox trailed this item pending the arrival of Port
Commissioner Creaser.
3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. SUGGESTION TO REQUIRE SUPPORTERS OF ORANGE TREE MOBILEHOME
PARK CONVERSION TO PAY DEPOSIT Anne H. Stewart, 521 Orange
Avenue, Sp. 18, Chula Vista 92011
Mrs. Stewart suggested the City require all supporters of the
Orange Tree Mobilehome Park conversion to pay their share of
the deposit rather than have the City advance ~75,000.
MSUC (Malcolm/Scott) that the Orange Tree Mobilehome Park letter
be acknowledged and considered during the Redevelopment Agency
meeting immediately following the City Council meeting this
afternoon.
MINUTES - 2 - April 1, 1986
b. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL TO SUPPORT SCA 9 REGARDING
RELEASE OF CONVICTED MURDERERS - Daniel E. Boatwright,
Chairman, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate, Rm.
3086, State Capitol, Sacramento 95814
Senator Daniel Boatwright requested the Council's support of
this measure which would safeguard California's current
process regarding releasing convicted murderers.
MSUC (Malcolm/Scott to support SCA 9.
c. REQUEST FOR PRINTING OF BUSINESS CARDS FOR THE PLANNING
COMMISSION - William S. Cannon, Chairman, Planning
Commission, 345 "F" Street, Chula Vista, CA 92010-2634
Mr. Cannon, asked the Council consider an exception to the
policy on business cards printing and usage. The Planning
Commission is concerned that cards recently issued for their
use do not have their name imprinted - they are required to
write it on the cards.
The recommendation of the City Manager was that the present
policy not be altered. It was noted if the City Council
determined that deviation from the present policy might be
appropriate, it would be recommended the entire matter be
referred to staff for a reanalysis of the entire question, as
well as providing the Council with cost data if each member
of Boards/Commissions was furnished business cards.
MS (Scott/Cox) approve staff's recommendation on the present
policy.
Councilman Malcolm expressed concern that the cost to print
member's names on the cards is not exorbitant and since the
Planning Commission is the highest level of Commissioners,
their request should be granted.
Councilman Scott commented the cost is not the issue, but the
fact that card holders could abuse this privilege.
The motion to approve staff's recommendation passed with
Councilman Malcolm opposed.
d. CONCERN REGARDING ACTIONS OF JOSEPH RASO Helen T.
Wadsworth, 175 Murray Street, Chula Vista, CA 92010
Mrs. Wadsworth was referring to a letter she received from
Joseph Raso in which he cited building corrections to her
residence.
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) that this letter be received and acknowledged
with the understanding that the Wadsworths received a building
permit in 1965 for a 300-square foot addition to their home, and
it was built according to City regulations.
MINUTES - 3 - April 1, 1986
e. REQUEST FOR COMPROMISE ON RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION AT 165
MURRAY STREET Joseph A. Raso, 165 Murray Street, Chula
Vista 92010
A compromise involving construction at 165 Murray Street was
offered to the City Council by Mr. Raso. He proposed the
City pay for demolition of his current structure,
construction of the new structure, and provide a housing
allowance for his family for the duration of this
construction.
City Manager Goss remarked if the City Council has an
interest in considering Mr. Raso's proposal, it be referred
to staff for a detailed analysis of all related matters,
including estimated cost.
It was moved by Councilman Malcolm to file the letter.
The motion died for lack of a second.
Councilwoman McCandliss arrived at this time, 4:10 p.m.
MSUC (Scott/Moore) to refer this to staff with the instruction
that Council get all the facts in the case to determine whether or
not the Council wants to do this.
f. PROPOSAL TO DEVELOP FREEWAY GATEWAY SYMBOL M. A. Rudd, 461
Emerson, Chula Vista 92011
The writer suggested the City develop its own gateway symbol,
(possibly a rainbow) on I-5.
It was recommended this matter be referred to staff for
evaluation.
Ms. Marl Rudd, 461 Emerson, Chula Vista 92011, appeared
before the City Council and discussed the following:
CalTrans has allowed a giant rainbow on an overpass directly
north of the Golden Gate Bridge over the freeway entering
Marin County; the City of San Diego is proceeding with
proposed City gateways across local freeways including I-5;
the symbol seems timely and appropriate for Chula Vista for
most of the City's off-ramps; symbol would be in conjunction
with the Diamond Jubilee.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to refer this letter and input from Ms. Rudd
to staff to consider and evaluate.
MINUTES - 4 - April 1, 1986
BAYFRONT REDEVELOPMENT TOUR
Councilman Scott remarked that on Wednesday, April 2,
officials from Washington, environmental agencies, and the
Army Corps of Engineers will be in the City to discuss the
Bayfront Redevelopment Project area. The Mayor has done a
tremendous job pushing this project forward; however, because
of a prior vacation commitment, the Mayor will be unable to
attend this all day meeting. Councilman Scott requested the
City pay the difference of the Mayor's vacation (going one
day later and losing the excursion fare) in order for him to
attend tomorrow's meeting.
MSC (Scott/Malcolm) that the City pay the difference of the
Mayor's trip ($808.97) in order for him to attend the meeting on
April 2. (Mayor Cox abstained.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF
PUBLIC ALLEY AT THE SOUTH END OF LAS
FLORES DRIVE (Continued from March 25,
1986) (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
RESOLUTION 12416 ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A
PUBLIC ALLEY SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY
TERMINUS OF LAS FLORES DRIVE
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox' declared
the public hearing open.
L & V Investments submitted a tentative parcel map to the City in
September of 1985. They proposed to divide two existing parcels
into four parcels. These properties lie just north of "E" Street
between Minot Avenue and Las Flores Drive. Among the conditions
of approval of this map is the requirement that the owners submit
a petition to the City to vacate the public alley located along
the westerly portion of the parcels.
All utility companies have been advised of the intention to
vacate. All have responded stating they do not object to the
vacation with the exception of the Sweetwater Authority. It was
requested that an easement covering the entire area being vacated
be reserved for any facilities the Authority may need to install
in the future.
MINUTES 5 April 1, 1986
Councilman Scott stated he has a brother-in-law who owns a home on
this street and he has also done over ~250 worth of business with
a client in the area. In addition, he has retained the services
of Mr. Legler, who is an attorney for this project and because of
a possible conflict of interest he stated he would abstain from
voting on this item as well as item #6 (Las Flores Drive,
Stree~ between Second Avenue and Minot).
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt stated in a recent
letter, Sweetwater Authority requests additional language be
placed in the facilities reservations which has been included as a
revised exhibit. In addition, Director Lippitt reported he spoke
with Mr. A1 Sorenson, Operations Director for Sweetwater
Authority~ who indicated he has no objection to the vacation, as
amended.
There being no public testimony either for or against, the public
hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, the reading of the
text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved
(Councilman Scott abstained).
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
IMPACT OF CONVENTION CENTER CONSTRUCTION COSTS ON EXISTING
PORT DISTRICT PROJECT - Port Commissioner Phil Creaser
Port Commissioner Phil Creaser gave a background on the San
Diego Convention Center project, including: the Ad Hoc
Committee has met 4 times regarding the increased cost to
construct the Center; Commissioners Wolfsheimer and Rick were
nominated by Deputy Mayor Struiksma to the Convention Center
Task Force; 6 bids were received for the Center's
construction; lowest base bid (for the building only) was
submitted by Continental Heller Stolte ($123,990,000); lowest
bid with additives was Bechtel (~131,964,432); Architect Ward
Deems felt largest discrepancy element of ~23 million was in
quantity of structural steel and reinforcement bars;
remainder of the estimates will be closely in line with the
bids; Task Force will meet on Wednesday, April 2 with the
architect.
Discussion followed regarding Deputy Mayor Struiksma's
willingness to include representatives of South Bay cities
on the task force; the Port District decision greatly affects
the City of Chula Vista and other Port projects; suggested a
weekly report be given to the Chula Vista Council on the
status; pointed out San Diego citizens voted for a 495
MINUTES 6 April 1, 1986
million convention center as opposed to $161 million; Chula
Vista was assured the project would not exceed $125 million;
City of San Diego should not have a "blank check" on the
convention center costs; other cities have keen interest in
this project and should have some input; City should know
where the Port District monies are being spent; Port District
should stay within the approved guidelines; structural
integrity should not be jeopardized.
MS (Scott/Cox) to authorize staff to monitor the situation and
report back as needed.
Councilman Malcolm questioned the motion as it related to
appointing a staff member who lacked expertise in this area
to determine the importance of submitting reports to the
Council. He contended the Port District representative is
well qualified to submit the reports directly to Council.
Councilman Scott withdrew his motion and the second agreed.
Commissioner Creaser assured the Council he would keep them
informed through the Mayor's office.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None.
CONSENT CALENDAR (6 13)
Items 12 and 13 pulled.
Councilman Scott reiterated he would abstain from voting on item
#6 pertaining to accepting contract work on Las Flores Drive, as
he has a possible conflict of interest.
MSUC (Cox/Moore) to approve the Consent Calendar. (Councilman
Scott abstained on item #6.)
6. RESOLUTION 12417 ACCEPTING CONTRACT WORK, LAS FLORES DRIVE
AND "D" STREET BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE AND
MINOT AVENUE (Director of Public
Works/City Engineer)
R. E. Hazard Contracting Company has completed the construction of
street and drainage improvements for Las Flores Drive and "D"
Street, between Second Avenue and Minor Avenue. The contract,
dated July 31, 1985, was awarded by Resolution 12102 on July 16,
1985.
MINUTES - 7 - April 1, 1986
7. RESOLUTION 12418 APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO FY 1985-86
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION FOR
ROUTE 32 SERVICE (Director of Public
Works/City Engineer)
The First Amendment contract cost of $81,519 reflects Route 32
service in the Montgomery area for a 6-month period, January 1
through June 30, 1986. This service modification is an increase
of service miles within the City of Chula Vista for this fiscal
year from 40,802 to 63,917, or 56 percent. Estimated passengers
per mile decreased from 3.24 to 2.69 or 20 percent, reflecting the
lower productivity of Route 32 in the Montgomery area. The SDTC
net cost per mile for this service in Chula Vista increased from
96~ to ~1.27, or 32 percent, which reflects changes to cost and
revenue factors reflected in the amended SDTC budget.
The SDTC claim against the City of Chula Vista's apportionment for
FY 1985-86 in the amount of $81,519 will leave a balance in the
City of Chula Vista account of $473,229. The addition of ~473,229
to prior year reserves will result in a total reserve in the City
of Chula Vista account of approximately ~1,000,039.
8. RESOLUTION 12419 AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION BY SCOOT OF THE FY
1986-87 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT
(TDA) ARTICLE 4.0 CLAIM (Director of
Public Works/City Engineer)
The FY 1986-87 SCOOT claim for TDA Article 4.0 funds to support
Chula Vista Transit (CVT) operations was submitted to MTDB and
SANDAG on April 1, 1986. State law requires that TDA claims be
submitted to MTDB and SANDAG by April 1 prior to the fiscal year
for which TDA funds are claimed. The total SCOOT claim is
$795,340, consisting of $759,950 claimed against the City of Chula
Vista's apportionment of ~1,854,047, and ~35,390 claimed against
the County of San Diego's apportionment.
9. RESOLUTION 12420 APPROVING SUBMISSION OF FY 1986-87
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA)
ARTICLE 4.5 CLAIM FOR HANDYTRANS
OPERATIONS (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
The City of Chula Vista's FY 1986-87 Article 4.5 Claim was
submitted to SANDAG and MTDB on April 1, 1986. State law requires
that the claim be submitted by April 1 prior to the fiscal year
for which funds are claimed. The claim amount is based upon an
allocation formula of Article 4.5 funds adopted by the SANDAG
Board in February 1985. Because of an increased allocation of TDA
funds to San Diego County in FY 1986-87, the City of Chula Vista's
Article 4.5 apportionment increased from the FY 1985-86 amount of
$176,756 to the FY 1986-87 amount of ~188,380, Or 6.5%.
MINUTES - 8 - April 1, 1986
HandYtrans operation for FY 1986-87 is funded by TDA Article 4.5
funds, Regional Center funds, farebox revenue, investment
earnings, and a recommendation in the FY 1986-87 HandYtrans budget
request that $6,110 be transferred from Transit Service Fund 235
to Fund 236 as additional operating support for HandYtrans.
10. RESOLUTION 12421 EXPRESSING OPPOSITION TO THE COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO CONSTRUCTING OR RELOCATING A
JAIL HOLDING OR CORRECTIONS FACILITY IN
CHULA VISTA OR ITS PLANNING AREA (Deputy
City Attorney)
On March 11, 1986, the City Council requested staff to prepare a
resolution opposing the construction or relocation of a jail
holding or corrections facility in Chula Vista or its planning
area.
11. RESOLUTION 12422 APPROVING CONTRACTS FOR A STATE ROUTE 125
STUDY: (A) CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY AND RICK
ENGINEERING FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES; (B)
CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY AND WILLDAN
ASSOCIATES FOR ASSESSMENT FINANCIAL
SERVICES AND LEGAL REVIEW AND; (C)
CONTRACT BETWEEN CITY AND GEORGE T.
SIMPSON FOR PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
CONTRACTS (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
Owners/developers in the vicinity of the proposed SR-125 corridor
have requested the City to conduct an in-depth engineering and
financial analysis of that facility to insure its timely financing
and construction. The owners/developers will provide all
necessary funds to conduct the study.
Representatives of EastLake Development Company, Central Federal
Savings and Loan (Bonita Meadows) and UNOCAL Corporation have
offered to jointly finance the study and have requested the
proposed consultants because of previous work and familiarity with
the project. The total cost of the study is estimated to be
$67,500. The consultants will be compensated as follows:
a. Rick Engineering ~49,000
b. Willdan Associates 8,500
c. F. MacKenzie Brown 2,500
d. George T. Simpson 7r500
TOTAL $67,500
MINUTES - 9 - April 1, 1986
12. RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION THAT LAND
CURRENTLY OWNED SHOULD BE HELD IN RESERVE
AND EXPRESSING COUNCIL'S SUPPORT OF STATE
ROUTE 252 (Assistant City Attorney)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
13. RESOLUTION INDICATING SUPPORT FOR SB 2061 (DEDDEH)
RELATING TO URBAN WATERFRONT RESTORATION
PROJECTS AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR PRO
TEMPORE TO ATTEND AN APRIL 8, 1986
HEARING IN SACRAMENTO (Assistant City
Attorney)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
12. RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CALIFORNIA
TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION THAT LAND
CURRENTLY OWNED SHOULD BE HELD IN RESERVE
AND EXPRESSING COUNCIL'S SUPPORT OF STATE
ROUTE 252 (Assistant City Attorney)
On March 27, 1986, Council requested that a resolution be prepared
recommending to the California Transportation Commission that
property currently owned by the State for State Route 252 not be
sold at this time but continue to be held in reserve for SR 252.
Councilman Malcolm noted he is still discussing this issue with
Councilman Jones of San Diego and additional information should be
obtained in order to discover why SANDAG has not taken a position
on this item.
MSUC (Malcolm/McCandliss) to continue for 2 weeks.
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
OTHER RESOLUTIONS AND RELATED ORDINANCES AND REPORTS
14. RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT TO THE SAN DIEGO
CITIES JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR RISK
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED INSURANCE
COVERAGES AND APPROPRIATING $190,000 FROM
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF PUBLIC
LIABILITY TRUST FUND (Director of Finance)
MINUTES - 10 - April 1, 1986
All cities in the State of California are currently experiencing
extraordinary difficulties in the area of general liability
insurance. The members of the San Diego County Cities Risk
Management Authority (RMA) have explored the limited options
available under this situation and have concluded that the risk
pooling arrangement, as approved by the City Council two weeks
ago, is the best method for addressing this crisis situation so
that the member cities will not have to "go bare" for any period
of time.
The City Council requested additional information regarding the
structure of the risk pooling arrangement, a list of cities
involved, and costs associated with such.
Councilman Malcolm expressed concern that staff has still not
presented all the facts requested by Council in order to give them
a reasonable idea of how to vote on the issue. His concerns
involved: Council approval of this agreement without knowing the
records of other cities involved; financial ability of other
cities to pay claims; Council needs information regarding cash
reserves if awards are made;. amount of claims of other cities and
what is their philosophy on this Joint Powers Authority (JPA).
Finance Director Christopher responded that since the writing of
this staff report, an outside attorney for the JPA has reviewed
the agreement and risk pooling structure. The City's proposal is
already permitted; therefore, the amendment is not needed.
In response to Councilman Moore's question, Director Christopher
declared past experience of members of the JPA plays a large role
in this issue. He explained the procedure for calculating the
premium rates noting the past 5-year loss experience of all cities
was taken into account. The recent experience in Chula Vista is
not any better than other cities in the JPA. Claims filed against
i last year (48 claims in the first 3 months in
1986). Chula Vista's potential risk exposure is either similar or
greater than other cities in the JPA.
Director Christopher added that Chula Vista is the largest city in
the JPA; however, the premium was lowered from $665,000 to
~450,000 based on the City's past experience.and
Councilman Malcolm emphasized the need for Council to know prior
claims filed against other cities in the JPA, pending litigation
and type of risk management program of each city.
It was moved by Councilman Scott that this item be continued until
Wednesday (April 2).
The motion died for lack of a second.
~INUTES - 11 - April 1, 1986
Mr. Ted Davidson, representing Robert F. Driver Company, pointed
out if Chula Vista does not participate in the JPA, they will be
without coverage until they do enter into the program; insurance
coverage will not be retroactive; proposed that additional
information required by Council be presented in a Council
Conference setting; discussed types of claims that could be filed
against the City.
MSUC (Scott/Cox) to continue the item to Wednesday, April 2 at
4:00 p.m.
13. RESOLUTION 12423 INDICATING SUPPORT FOR SB 2061 (DEDDEH)
RELATING TO URBAN WATERFRONT RESTORATION
PROJECTS AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR PRO
TEMPORE TO ATTEND AN APRIL 8, 1986
HEARING IN SACRAMENTO (Assistant City
Attorney)
On March 27, 1986, Council requested that a resolution be prepared
which supports SB 2061 relating to appropriation of funds from the
Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas Lease revenues for urban
waterfront restoration projects.
In answer to Councilman Malcolm's question, Mayor Cox noted
simultaneous efforts by other cities to support this bill.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text
was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
15. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. Mr. Cliff Swanson, the new Deputy Director Of Public Works,
was introduced to the Council.
b. City Manager Goss reported Channel 69 has contacted the
Public Information Officer regarding nominations for "Citizen
of the Week."
16. MAYOR'S REPORT
a. Mayor Cox apologized to Council and Mr. Santos regarding a
letter Mr. Santos referred to at last week's conference which
was misplaced.
b. The Mayor stated he received a phone call regarding the turn
out at Rohr Park on Easter Sunday, the number of cars parked
on the street in that location, parking lot at east end of
the Optimist property was secured, and suggestions offered
for adequate parking in the future.
MSUC (Cox/Scott) to refer' this issue to staff to evaluate if there
is a need to do something (regarding the parking situation).
MINUTES 12 - April 1, 1986
c. The Mayor reported he and Councilman Scott attended a meeting
with representatives of the "J" Street Marina and the Port
Commissioner this morning. It was suggested that the name
"'J' Street Marina" does not connote the best designation for
the City of Chula Vista.
MSUC (Cox/Moore) to ask the Port District to consider changing the
name "'J' Street Marina" to something more indicative of the City
of Chula Vista and the type of environment the City is trying to
create in that area and request it be called "Chula Vista Harbor."
Council discussion ensued regarding the intent to create an
integrated name for the entire area and perhaps docketing this for
a future Council meeting.
AMENDMENT TO MOTION
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to docket this for consideration.
17. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. Councilman Malcolm suggested the formation of a committee to
work with the property owner of the recently condemned
Cabrillo Lanes bowling alley at "E" Street and I-5 to come up
with a relocation for this facility.
MSUC (Malcolm/Scott) to designate Councilman Malcolm and
Councilwoman McCandliss as the sub-committee to work with the
bowling alley (owners) to relocate them in Chula Vista.
b. Councilwoman McCandliss referred to the Council's action last
week regarding the traffic situation in the Tiffany School
area.
MSC McCandliss/Scott) to prepare a report on how, over what time
period, and what type of monitoring will occur regarding the
traffic situation in the (Tiffany School) area. (Councilman Moore
opposed.)
c. Councilman Scott read a letter to the City Council expressing
his intent to resign from the City Council effective April
15, 1986.
Council discussion ensued regarding Councilman Scott's
announcement. The Mayor and Councilmembers noted that
Councilman Scott has served with distinction for 18 years and
his business expertise has been extremely valuable and will
be missed.
MINUTES 13 - April 1, 1986
d. MSUC (Cox/Moore) at the conclusion of the Redevelopment
Agency meeting, the Council reconvene for a Closed Session
for discussion of the Section 404 Permit and pending
litigation (Sierra Club vs. Coastal Commission).
The Council recessed at 5:35 pm.m to the Redevelopment Agency
meeting and reconvened at 6:25 p.m. to Closed Session. The City
Clerk was excused and the Assistant City Manager reported the
session ended at 6:45 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT AT 6:45 p.m. to the meeting of Tuesday, April 2, 1986
at 4 p.m.
~ennie M. Fulasz, CMC Adele A. Sarmiento
City Clerk Deputy City Clerk
0765C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Adele A. Sarmiento, being first duly sworn depose and say:
That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting Deputy City Clerk
of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista.
That the reqular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, ADril 1, 1986,
and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in
the Order of Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO:.
That on Wednesday, April 2, 1986, at the hour of 10 a.m.
I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the
door of the place at which said meeting of April 1, 1986,
was held.
Deputy City Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
~..\~ day of
19~
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday, April 1, 1986
The City Council met in the Council Chamber of the Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 4 p.m. with
the following:
Councilmen Present: Scott, McCandliss, Cox, Malcolm, Moore
Councilmen Absent: None
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting until Wednesday, April 2, 1986,
at 4 p.m. in the Council C~m~Conference Room, City Hall/
Px~b~b~x~~ 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
I, Adele A. Sarmiento, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an
order by the City Council at the meeting of April 1, 1986
Deputy City Clerk
City of Chula Vista, California