Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1986/03/25 MINUTES OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, March 25, 1986 Council Chamber 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Moore, Scott, McCandliss MEMBERS ABSENT: Councilman Malcolm STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Goss, Assistant City Manager Asmus, Assistant City Attorney Gill PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG~ SILENT PRAYER The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meeting of March 18, 1986. Mayor Cox noted a the City Clerk distributed a revision to the minutes of March 18. The revision was the omission of the figure of ~5,174 on page 6 relating to the utility tax collected by the City prior to the Montgomery annexation. MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to approve the minutes as amended. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY The Oath of Office was administered by City Clerk Jennie Fulasz to Helen Motto, Commission on Aging, and Anne Fabrick, Human Relations Commission. 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY - Claim Nos. 1 through 4 Bobbie Marie Burchard, Gregory Alan Burchard, Robert Gregory Stacey, Corrina May Stacey, 1234 Mission Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92011 On February 11, 1986, each of the above four claimants presented a Claim to the City in the amount of ~25,000, alleging "invasion of privacy, false arrest and trespassing" by members of the Chula Vista Police Department. These claims stemmed from an incident on November 7, 1985 involving a search of the premises at 1234 Mission Avenue, Chula Vista, by virtue of a valid search warrant. Minutes - 2 - Mar~l~ 25, 1986 Claim No. 5 - Florencio Cabrera, c/o Michael K. Newlee, 5135 North Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92106 A claim was filed on February 28, 1986, for ~100,000 alleging personal injury, loss of wages and medical treatment. According to the claim, a signal near the 500 Tidelands Avenue area was "rendered inoperative by order of employees of the City of Chula Vista" and thereby contributed to the injuries suffered by Mr. Cabrera when he was struck by an intoxicated motorist. Claim No. 6 - Francisco Baus, c/o Laughlin & Peabody, 3333 Camino Del Rio South, Suite 170, San Diego, CA 92108 Mr. Baus filed a claim against the City on February 26, 1986 for indemnity regarding a lawsuit filed and served upon him in connection with a three-car accident in Chula Vista. Claim No. 7 - David Winn, c/o James E. Swingley, Esq., 303 "A" Street, Suite 401, San Diego, CA 92101 On March 3, 1986, an Application for Leave to Present Late Claim (Government Code Section 911.4) with the City of Chula Vista was filed. The Application attached a proposed claim in an unspecified amount alleging personal injuries suffered by claimant while riding a bike southbound on the Coronado commuter bikeway. Claim No. 8 - United States Fire Insurance Company, c/o Marshall L. Foreman, 1010 Second Avenue, Suite '2301, San Diego, CA 92101 On February 6, 1986, Application for Leave to Present Late Claim on behalf of United States Fire Insurance Company was filed. The Application (claiming ~125,000 plus interest and filed with the City as successors-in-interest to the Montgomery Fire District) alleges the City was responsible for the damages sustained during a helicopter display at the San Diego County Fire Service Expo in Mission Valley. The City Manager recommended that all claims and applications for Leave to Present Late Claims be rejected. MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) claims 1 through 8 be rejected. City Manager Goss informed Council that approximately 31 claims were filed against the City in 1985, compared to approximately 60 to 80 claims filed this year. Minutes 3 March 25, 1986 b. REQUEST TO INSTALL HARDWARE AND FLAGS FOR BUSINESS SALUTES CHULA VISTA FAIR - Chamber of Commerce, 233 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010 The Chamber of Commerce proposed the installation of hardware .for the placement of flags on eighty poles on Third Avenue and Broadway to promote the Business Salutes Chula Vista Fair. City Manager Goss recommended this request be approved noting that staff is "sensitive to the incremental impact" that small projects like this have on ongoing workload. MSUC (Moore/McCandliss) for approval per the City Manager's recommendation. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF PUBLIC ALLEY AT THE SOUTH END OF LAS FLORES DRIVE (Continued from March 11, 198~)(Director Of Public Works/City Engineer) RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A PUBLIC ALLEY SOUTH OF THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF LAS FLORES DRIVE This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared the public hearing open. Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt explained L & V Investments submitted a tentative parcel map to the City in September 1985. They proposed to divide two existing parcels into four parcels. These properties lie just north of "E" Street between Minot Avenue and Las Flores Drive. Among the conditions of approval of this map is the requirement that the owners submit a petition to the City to vacate the public alley located along the westerly portion of the parcels. Councilman Moore expressed concern that the Sweetwater Authority had not responded regarding objections to vacate the property. Director Lippitt explained staff is recommending an easement be reserved for any facilities the Authority may need to install in the future. The City will reserve the entire area for its existing sewer and storm drain facilities. However, nothing in writing has been received from Sweetwater Authority objecting to the vacation. There being no public testimony either for Or against, the hearing was closed. Minutes - 4 - March 25, 1986 Discussion ensued regarding lack of response from Sweetwater Authority regarding the vacation. Director Lippitt pointed out that according to State law, utility companies have certain rights in any vacation proceedings even if they don't reserve the right. He suggested the public hearing be closed and staff be directed to obtain a letter from Sweetwater Authority regarding any objections they may have. Assistant City Attorney Gill commented the resolution does not expressly provide for an easement. If Council wished to take action tonight, the resolution could be amended to provide that the easement would be reserved for Sweetwater Authority, but the public hearing does not need to be continued. Councilman Moore remarked the resolution should be reviewed by both entities (City Council and Sweetwater Authority). Mayor Cox, noting the attendance of the property owners, suggested the public hearing be reopened. MSUC (Scott/Cox) to reopen the public hearing. Mr. Richard Alvord, representing the property owners, discussed Sweetwater Authority's concern with creating a waterline loop form Las Flores into Minot Avenue. Therefore, an easement to provide the loop will be installed in the future. MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to continue the public hearing for one week (to April 1) and have information suggested by Councilman Moore. 5. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOUNDARY OF OPEN SPACE LOT 115 OF OPEN SPACE DISTRICT #3, RANCHO ROBINHOOD SUBDIVISION (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) On March 4, 1986, the Council adopted Resolution No. 12400 setting March 25, 1986, as the date and time for a public hearing to consider adjusting the boundary of the open space lot in Rancho Robinhood Subdivision. The adjustment is proposed to be adjacent to the rear of 311, 315, and 319 Surrey Drive. The owners of these properties have proposed to purchase the City's interest in that portion of open space which contains level areas adjacent to the rear of their properties. To accomplish this, the City Code requires that the Council hold a public hearing in order to consider the boundary adjustment. The Department of Parks & Recreation has no objection to this boundary change. Minutes 5 - March 25, 1986 Director Lippitt submitted transparencies noting the following: Dr. Taylor, owner of property at 315 Surrey Drive, applied for an encroachment permit to construct a retaining wall and storage shed within the City's open space lot no. 115 in February 1983; a public hearing was called as a result of interest expressed by adjacent property owners; current use of the property in question (play area); noted the chain link fence constructed on the property; liability risk to the City if an encroachment permit is not granted; purpose of hearing is to modify the boundaries of the district and determine if that area should be part of the boundary or included with the back yards of the residents; procedure for creating an open space district; grading was done in such a manner that level pad areas extended into City's open space; City will not gain by keeping this lot in the open space district; if the City decides not to modify the open space district and authorize an encroachment permit, recommend owner be allowed to install swimming pool; Parks and Recreation Department does not have a final recommendation at this time. In response to Council's question regarding formality of the Homeowners Association~ Parks & Recreation Director Mollinedo indicated staff meets with the Homeowners Association on a yearly basis regarding services and cost to maintain their district. Mayor Cox indicated that if the property was sold, the open space maintenance district would be the beneficiary of any purchase of the property. Conversely, the open space maintenance district would have lower fees as a result of this sale. The following individuals spoke in opposition to the item: Jan Perdue, 902 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita 92002; John Steepy, 309 Bronco Place, Bonita; Joan Gutierrez, 949 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita; James H. Johnson, 424 Stoneridge Court, Bonita; William Baily, 339 Surrey Drive, Bonita; Brian Wilson, 937 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita; John Aspholm, 351 Surrey Drive, Bonita. Their concerns included the following:' Council would be setting a precedent if they sold part of the open space; homeowners were not aware of these proceedings for adjusting boundaries of open space district #3; no official position taken by homeowners association members; monthly homeowners association meetings for open space district no. 3 currently being held; complimented Open Space Coordinator for his responsiveness to homeowners' concerns; if this boundary change is approved other property owners with similar requests should be addressed; some properties in the open space district not maintained by the City; 40 homes border on the open space property and owners could request the same use; beauty of the open space district should be maintained; swimming pool referred to in the staff report was never built; selling of open space area will encourage storage of RV's, storage sheds and trees Minutes 6 March 25, 1986 blocking views to adjacent residences: acreage could be reduced 24% in this area which would affect zoning; property in open space district was purchased with the understanding open space area would be available for sale to abutting property owner; never made aware of proceedings regarding sale of open spaces; subject property owner's land value would increase 40%; oppose any deviation from the existing open space district. Dr. Stephen Taylor (property owner requesting boundary adjustment), 315 Surrey Drive, Bonita; Jerry Tucker, 319 Surrey Drive; Allen Keebler, 948 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita; and Brenda Taylor, 315 Surrey Drive, Chula Vista, spoke in favor of the proposed boundary adjustment for open space lot 115. Their concerns included: existing chain link fence erected 8 years ago due to lack of maintenance, landscaping and irrigation of the parcel in question; City was contacted 6 years ago regarding encroaching on the open space lots; staff suggested proposal to purchase open space area; responded to Council concern regarding erection of the fence - it can be removed as easily as it has been installed; suggested Council take each request on a case-by-case basis in order not to set a dangerous precedent; benefits to abutting homeowners would far outweigh detriments to other property owners; respect open space sanctity; property was never returned to its natural state; original request was for storage shed and a retaining wall setback from the slope; no neighbor has ever complained that property owner is encroaching on the open space; would not be fair to assign a fair market value to the property. There being no further public testimony either for or against, the public hearing was closed. Councilwoman McCandliss stated she would be uncomfortable in making a decision to sell the property because of the precedent it would set as well as the lack of input from the Homeowners Association. Discussion ensued regarding the original dedication of the open space district; how the fair market value was determined; easement was considered since fee title was not held by the City; true determination on the property value should be made by an appraiser; Council should encourage more active participation by homeowners associations in these districts; suggested staff develop guidelines or procedures that could be used in the districts in the event this proposal is accepted by the homeowners; existing fee titles held by City on new developments. MSUC (McCandliss/Scott) that this action be deferred and refer to staff the development of a policy dealing with the purchase of open space areas by property owners and have that distributed to participants in the open space districts for input and brought back to Council prior to any action. Minutes - 7 - March 25, 1986 MS (Cox/Scott) ask staff to come back with a report regarding open space maintenance districts currently in the City of Chula Vista indicating which ones are owned in fee title by the City and which ones revert to the original developer of the property. Discussion followed concerning the fee title. It was suggested staff could discover if owners would relinquish their fee titles to the City. Councilman Scott suggested the removal of any clauses stating the fee title reverts to the original developer. The motion to have staff report back on the fee titles passed unanimously. Councilwoman McCandliss requested that a resolution be brought back in approximately 4 to 6 months on Council's action in order to hold the necessary hearings and meet with the homeowners associations. 6. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS At this time, Mayor Cox announced the meeting to which the public hearing on Las Flores Drive was continued (April 1) would begin at 4:00 p.m. a. Joe Raso, 167 Murray Street, Chula Vista, requested permission to address the Council on his current residential construction on Murray Street. Assistant City Attorney Gill suggested since Mr. Raso has applied for a variance as recommended by staff, he would have a strong legal concern about Council's consideration of evidence as this would be outside the due process. Mr. Raso has the right to address the Council, however, he requested Mr. Raso defer any comments until the variance comes to the City Council. Council was also advised not to comment on this item tonight. Mr. Raso acknowledged the Attorney's remarks and distributed photos of a home (in Coronado) which he would like to build on Murray Street and referred to his letter to Council noting: problems developed as a result of his residential construction were not his fault; permit was issued by the City; construction has been performed precisely according to plan; entire life savings have gone into this project; building permit was obtained in April 1985; City has issued a Notice to Stop Construction, however, contractors cannot be ordered to stop and he will continue to build; he has paid over $3,000 in permit fees; staff has advised that 45.8% of the lot occupied by this structure exceeds the normal requirements; plans have been in plan.check seven times. Minutes - 8 - March 25, 1986 Councilwoman McCandliss suggested Mr. Raso's letter distributed to Council this evening be referred to staff in order for them to comment on the different charges in the next couple of weeks including whether staff should have calculated the lot coverage and the height of the structure. 'Assistant City Attorney Gill stated he had no problem with the reference to staff; however, he advised against further Council comments on this issue. He suggested it may be inappropriate as well to include this information in Council's packet until the variance is submitted for a hearing to the City Council. Planning Director Krempl explained Mr. Raso applied for a variance after he was apprised his structure did not comply with City Codes. The City has two options available regarding the variance process: (1) the Zoning Administrator could convene a public hearing and that action can be appealed to the Planning Commission whose decision could be appealed by the City Council and, (2) the Zoning Administrator could refer the matter directly to the Planning Commission without Zoning Administrator consideration. The Planning Commission would convene a public hearing of that action which could be appealed to Council. The earliest date this would come to the Planning Commission could be April 23. Mr. Calvin Bright, 1203 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, proposed his support for the construction due to his association with Mr. Raso for many years. He stated the drawings have been submitted in compliance with City procedures and Mr. Raso wishes to comply with City rules and regulations. MS (McCandliss/Cox) to refer the letter from Mr. Raso to staff with a response to Council. Councilman Scott suggested that included in the motion should be any information pertaining to this subject be brought to Council at any subsequent public hearing. The motion, as amended, passed unanimously. The meeting recessed at 8:50 p.m. and reconvened at 8:57 p.m. b. Mr. H. Duncan, 1100 Industrial Blvd, Space 1-17, Chula Vista, representing the Brentwood Mobilehome Park Rent Negotiation Commission, appeared before the Council to discuss a letter from Dave Gustafson, Assistant Community Development Director, delivered to Mr. Bob Flaugher on Tuesday, September 17, 1985. Specifically, he expressed concern that other members of the Commission did not receive a copy of the letter and thus, were unable to respond to the Minutes - 9 - March 25, 1986 "misrepresentations". Generally, concerns were: Commission was disbanded; rent mediation ordinance process was dropped and decision to litigate the issue independently was made; Commission had reached an impasse and had requested the next step as outlined in Ordinance 1997, SS 9.50.110; management proposal was presented to resident homeowners and strongly rejected; Commission has neither the power or authority to disband itself; Commission still awaiting a meeting with the park owner; Commission has been unable to meet since the Labor Day holiday in 1985; downward rent adjustment amounts to 27~ per month; bias of staff against Brentwood Park homeowners during Negotiation Commission meetings; to disband the Negotiation Commission was felt to De a dereliction of duties by the members. Discussion followed concerning the purpose of Ordinance 1997 (AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW CHAPTER 9.50 ENTITLED "MOBILEHOME PARK SPACE RENT MEDIATION" TO CREATE A MECHANISM FOR MEDIATING MOBILEHOME PARK SPACE RENTS). Assistant City Attorney Gill stated the present ordinance -provides an enforcement mechanism solely for the purpose of parties getting together for mediation. Upon impasse, the parties, if they so elect and to cover their own expenses, can go to an arbitrator to arbitrate differences. The ordinance does not require parties to go to the next step. Community Development Director Desrochers explained Mr. Gustafson was unable to attend this evening's meeting to respond to the allegations made by Mr. Duncan. He noted the rent increase at Brentwood Mobilehome Park exceeds the cost of living index currently being used. MS (Cox/Scott) refer letter signed by Messrs. Duncan, Flaugher, Roland, and Mrs. Click to staff for comment and come back at the meeting of April 8 and in the meantime ask staff to get the Committee back together to obtain a resolution or consensus that they are at impasse. The motion to refer the letter to staff passed unanimously. Bob Flaugher, 1100 Industrial Blvd., Chula Vista 92011, distributed correspondence to Council advising that the proposed Mobilehome Rent Control Initiative was published by the Chula Vista Star-News on March 23, 1986; the publication affadavit was filed with the City Clerk as required by the Election Code on March 25, 1986; after the required 21-day waiting period petitions would be distributed to collect signatures of registered voters in Chula Vista to place this initiative on the ballot; Commission feels they Minutes - 10 March 25, 1986 have no other recourse; the CPI is inflated; willing to go back to discuss Ordinance 1997 if the park owner is willing to and a different moderator is appointed; requested Council cooperation in making the transition towards rent control easier. Mr. Heinz Seiler, 1425 Second Avenue #309, Chula Vista 92011, opposed rent stabilization; noted lack of cooperation from landlords; 105% increase in 6 years is a fair profit for owners; spiraling rent increases cannot continue; Ordinance was requested to give tenters protection; Ordinance 1997 is ineffective. c. Mr. Jack Unger, 714 Elm Avenue, Chula Vista, stated his neighbor is in the process of converting his 2-car garage for a third family. He questioned the possibility of allowing 2-3 families on one lot. MS (Scott/McCandliss) to refer this to staff. In answer to Council's questions, Director Krempl stated a staff report was submitted to Council previously regarding guest houses in the zoning Text Amendment. Guest houses would only be allowed in the R-E (Residential Estate) districts. This item is scheduled before the City Council on April 22. The motion to refer the item to staff passed unanimously. d. Mr. Cliff Roland, 1100 Industrial Blvd., Chula Vista, noted the letter submitted this evening from Mr. Flaugher was not authorized by the Mobilehome Committee for distribution to Council. CONSENT CALENDAR (7 - 16) Items 7, 11, and 16 pulled. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to approve the Consent Calendar. 7. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION INSPECTION OF DESIGNATED SEWER MAINS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, PHASE II (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) Pulled from Consent Calendar. Minutes - 11 - March 25, 1986 8. RESOLUTION 12412 APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT NUMBERS 11-0094A/2 AND 11-0116A/1 BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR ACQUISITION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND UTILITY RELOCATION FOR I-5/54 INTERCHANGE AND TIDELANDS AVENUE INTERCONNECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) In the early 1970's Chula Vista deposited $100,000 with CalTrans for the purpose of acquiring rights-of-way and engineering costs for the Tidelands Avenue ramps from State Route 54. The current project is under construction and the Tidelands Avenue ramps are not a part of the project. The proposed amendments to the agreements with the State terminates the agreement and provides for the refunding of the City's $100,000 deposit. 9. RESOLUTION 12413 TRANSFERRING LAUDERBACH PARK AND WOODLAWN PARK CENTER FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 57470(h) (Director of Parks & Recreation) This is a request to accept the deed that transfers the two park properties, Lauderbach Park and a .7 acre undeveloped parcel across from the Woodlawn Park Center, from the County to the City in conjunction with the Montgomery Annexation. 10. RESOLUTION 12414 AUTHORIZING WAIVER OF BICYCLE LICENSING FEES FOR PARTICIPANTS IN THE ALL-CITY BICYCLE RODEOS (Director of Public Works/City Engineer/Safety Commission Chairman) Ordinance No. 2109 has previously authorized the waiving of bicycle license fees for events such as the annual "Bicycle Rodeos" sponsored by the Chula Vista Police Department. This year's Bicycle Rodeos are scheduled for Saturday, May 31, at Rice Elementary School, on Saturday, June 7, at Hilltop Drive Elementary School, and on Saturday, June 14, at Loma Verde Elementary School. 11. REPORT REQUEST BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR CITY ASSISTANCE IN THE BUSINESS SALUTES FAIR TO CHULA VISTA (Director of Parks & Recreation) Pulled from Consent Calendar. Minutes - 12 - March 25, 1986 12. REPORT REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A MEMORIAL TREE IN MEMORY OF MRS. ELIZABETH ULLRICH AT THE PARKWAY GYMNASIUM GROUNDS (Director of Parks & Recreation) The department has received a request from members of the City's Womens Physical Fitness class to dedicate a tree on the Parkway Gym grounds in memory of their teacher, Mrs. Elizabeth Ullrich. The Parks and Recreation Commission, at their March 20, 1986 meeting endorsed the request and recommended approval. 13. REPORT CHULA VISTA ART GUILD REQUEST TO CONDUCT ART MARTS ON LIBRARY GROUNDS (Director of Parks & Recreation) The Chula Vista Art Guild, a local non-profit organization, wishes to conduct seven two-day Art Marts, from April through November, using the grassy area of the Memorial Park grounds across from Fuddruckers. The Marts would run from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. The Art Guild also requested permission to reserve five (5) parking spaces adjacent to the park for the artists to unload their equipment. It was recommended that Council approve the request to conduct Art Marts on City property and waive business license fees. 14. REPORT ST. JUDE'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL REQUEST TO CONDUCT A BIKE-A-THON IN THE AREA OF THE CHULA VISTA MARINA (Director of Parks & Recreation) St. Jude's Research Hospital, under the Chairmanship of Officer Pat Cameron, National City Police Department, is requesting permission to conduct a Bike-A-Thon on May 10, 1986, in the area of the Chula Vista Marina as a fund raiser for the Research Center at St. Jude's Hospital for Children. The recommendation was that Council approve the request subject to staff conditions. 15. REPORT BONITA ROADRUNNERS REQUEST TO CONDUCT A 10K ROAD RACE (Director of Parks & Recreation) The Bonita Roadrunners, Inc. requested permission to stage a 5K and a 10K road race around Rohr Park on Saturday, May 24, 1986. A waiver of fees is also requested. It was recommended that Council approve the race, subject to staff conditions and deny the request to waive fees. Minutes - 13 - March 25, 1986 16. REPORT REGARDING GARAGE CONVERSIONS (Director of Planning) pulled from Consent Calendar. END QF CONSENT CALENDAR 7. RESOLUTION 12415 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT TELEVISION INSPECTION OF DESIGNATED SEWER MAINS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, PHASE II (Director of Public Works/City Engineer) The project includes the cleaning and closed circuit television inspection of selected sewer mains within the City of Chula Vista. Additionaliy, a written report is required which evaluates the condition of the sewer mains inspected, identifies problem areas, and proposes alternatives to solving deficiencies discovered during the investigation. The contract to be awarded will complete the intended scope of the project budgeted in the FY 85-86 Capital Improvement Pbogram (CIP). The first phase of the project was awarded by Council on January 14, 1986, by Resolution No. 12330 and is now in progress. Funds are available to cover this contract in Account No. 600-6000-SIll. The funds would be required as follows: a Phase II Contract Amount ~ 33,600.00 b Engineering and Inspection Costs 902.48 TOTAL $ 34,502.48 c Funds Available $ 34,502.48 It was recommended that Council award the contract to National Plant Services, Inc., 1461 Harbor Avenue, Long Beach, California, in the amount of $33,600.00. In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' question regarding a preventive maintenance program, Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt explained any time frequent blockages are experienced, they are put on a monthly cleaning program. In the future staff will probably issue contracts for older portions of the City where these are more likely to occur. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. Minutes - 14 March 25, 1986 11. REPORT REQUEST BY THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR CITY ASSISTANCE IN THE BUSINESS SALUTES FAIR TO CHULA VISTA (Director of Parks & Recreation) Director of Parks & Recreation Mollinedo reported that at the meeting of January 28, 1986, the City Council considered a request from Mrs. Jeri Vanderpool, Chairperson for the 1986 Business Salutes Fair, regarding the following: painting exhibit backboards, increasing electrical capability in the plaza area, and improving the public address system for the plaza area. The recommendation was: 1. That the City share in 50% of the cost for equipment and material associated with the increased amperage and purchase of the speaker system. The City contribution of $1,350 would be evenly divided with the Chamberof Commerce who will provide their share from revenues derived from the Business Salute Fair. 2. Authorize $2,940 from the u~appropriated general fund reserves to purchase necessary materials and equipment with the understanding that some of these costs will be reimbursed by the Chamber of Commerce. In response to Councilwoman McCandliss' concern, Director Mollinedo stated staff will try to place the speakers in an attractive location. The major concern of staff is to give the best sound the speakers can provide. He noted the wires will be permanent but the speakers can be removed. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to accept the report. 16. REPORT REGARDING GARAGE CONVERSIONS (Director of Planning) In April, 1985, the City Council directed staff to return with a report and recommendation regarding whether garage conversions should be prohibited in the City. The staff report addressed present parking and conversion requirements, history of parking and conversion requirements, and parking and conversion requirements of other jurisdictions. The recommendation was that Council direct staff to prepare an amendment to the garage conversion provisions of the Municipal Code with a referral to the Planning Commission for a report and recommendation. Minutes 15 - March 25, 1986 Councilwoman McCandliss noted she was originally opposed to this ordinance a few years ago. She recognized the fact that parking problems in older areas of the City exist and that more homes are likely to convert their garages for living space; problem of cars parked on front lawns. She stated she could support an ordinance if it were amended to require better accommodations of the parking requirements. MSUC (McCandliss/Cox) consideration be given to expanding the parking requirements for garage conversions and that also be referred to the Planning Commission for review, along with the report. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS 17. REPORT REGARDING REQUEST FROM TIFFANY SCHOOL REPRESENTATIVES FOR TRAFFIC STOPS AND SIGNALS IN THE SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE AREA (Director Of Public Works/City Engineer/Safety Commission Chairman) On December 17, 1985, the City Council, referred this written communication request to staff and the Safety Commission for report and recommendations. Specifically, Tiffany School representatives are concerned with the following areas: (1) Charter Point, (2) College Estates, and (3) the area west of Southwestern College The Safety Commission, at their meeting of February 13, 1986, recommended that Council suggest the Chula Vista Elementary School District bus all grammar school children residing on the west side of Otay Lakes Road to Tiffany Elementary School. On March 13, 1986, the Safety Commission recommended against the installation of any additional traffic control devices (i.e., lights, four-way stops) at the Auburn/East "H" Street intersection. Staff will continue to monitor this area (East "H" Street, Rutgers Avenue, Auburn Avenue, etc.) for possible installations in the future. Councilwoman McCandliss expressed concern with staff's recommendation regarding monitoring of the area. Specifically, she requested the type of monitoring done by staff and when this will occur. In response, Traffic Engineer Glass stated traffic counts have been taken in this area during the end of the school day. Staff has observed students crossing from all locations besides the crosswalks. Minutes - 16 - March 25, 1986 MS (McCandliss/Cox) accept staff recommendation with addition that a letter or report come back to the Council basically to show how the City will monitor the situation (what frequency and how is staff approaching the situation out there). Discussion ensued regarding the intent of the motion. Mayor Cox pointed out as the East "H" Street opens and more development occurs, this should also be monitored. Councilwoman McCandliss clarified staff should inform Council when these counts are being taken as the Council has a responsibility to provide answers to the public. The motion to accept the staff recommendation with a report back failed by the following vote: AYES: McCandliss, Cox, NOES: Moore, Scott ABSTENTIONS: None ABSENT: Malcolm. MS (McCandliss/Cox) to continue this item for one week. (The motion failed with Councilmen Scott and Moore opposed.) MSC (Scott/Moore) to accept the report. (Councilwoman McCandliss opposed.) 18. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER None. 19. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox announced the City of Chula Vista has the opportunity to become the home port for the tall ship "Californian." MSUC (Cox/Scott) ask staff to look into the pros and cons for becoming home port for the tall ship "Californian," work in conjunction with the Port District and the Marina, and come back with a report. b. Mayor Cox requested at the conclusion of the Council meeting and the Redevelopment Agency meeting that a Closed Session be convened. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to go into Closed Session for purposes of Section 404 Permit discussions and pending litigation, Sierra Club vs. Coastal Commission (at the close of the business meeting). Minutes - 17 / March 25, 1986 20. COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilman Moore expressed concern with the absence of a "Yield" sign in the west-bound turn lane at Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to refer this to staff. b. The sub-committee of Councilmen Scott and Moore met to consider the Chamber of Commerce's request for the City's participation in taking out an ad in the Lawton Printing Company publication. It was noted the Cities of Coronado, National City and Imperial Beach have all purchased 1/2-page color ads at $1,000 each. San Ysidro is considering this also. MSUC (Moore/Scott) for Chula Vista to take out a 1/2-page color ad in Lawton Printing Company's publication for $1,000. c. Designer Showcase has contacted the City regarding a request to put up a tent for two days on private property in the 600 block of Second Avenue beginning April 24. Councilman Moore suggested an emergency ordinance be prepared to respond to this request. Assistant City Attorney Gill stated a Conditional Use Permit for this type of facility would be warranted and recommended Planning staff prepare a report which would specifically recognize this type of use. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to bring back an emergency ordinance to permit the installation of the tent. d. Councilman Moore suggested Council consider authorization to print 20,00~ copies of the 75th Diamond Anniversay Medallion in con~nction with a coloring contest for elementary school students. The Committee will provide paper and the school will distribute awards and have the formal presentation. It was moved by Councilman Scott to accept the challenge and present the City Council and City Manager with a medallion and a historical book. The motion died for lack of a second. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to authorize printing (20,000 copies of the medallion) for the 75th Diamond Anniversary coloring contest. e. MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) that Councilmembers and the City Manager be provided with a medallion and the historical book. (Councilman Moore abstained.) Minutes - 18 March 25, 1986 f. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned the information item pertaining to the remodeling of the City Hall North Wing; particularly the clerical work station. In response, Assistant City Manager Asmus stated a diagram of this area will be provided to Council. g. Councilwoman McCandliss requested a status on the Bay Hospital situation. Community Development Director Desrochers indicated a report will be docketed for the Council meeting on April 15. Discussion followed concerning the agenda items currently docketed for the April 15 meeting (i.e., community appearance program RV's), with the Mayor noting he will be out of town on April 8 and possibly the week of the 15th. MSC (Cox/McCandliss) to re-notice the public hearing on the RV's for April 22 and the Bay Hospital item to be considered on April 15. h. Councilman Scott received a status report from Director Lippitt regarding the asphalt at Hilltop Elementary School. Director Lippitt explained the elementary school was informed they needed an encroachment permit. i. Councilman Scott commented on Mr. Raso's remarks under oral communications that although his Murray Street building was "red-tagged" he would continue construction on his project. City Manager Goss explained the City's options in this event: seek criminal action or an injunction. Staff is evaluating amount of construction currently ongoing. j. Councilman Scott discussed the recent increase of the San Diego Convention Center constrQction cost (up to ~131 million). He expressed concern that other port district projects are being jepoardized due to this increase. MS (Scott/McCandliss) have the City's Port Commissioner come in as soon as possible and explain exactly what the increase means, what his position is and then at a subsequent meeting Council will form a policy on how they feel about this. Mayor Cox reported acting Mayor Struiksma of San Diego has formed a sub-committee to look into the increased cost of the project. However, representation on this committee is made up entirely of residents of San Diego. He indicated he would contact the acting Mayor to request representation from four of the South Bay cities on this committee. Minutes - 19 - March 25, 1986 k. In response to Councilman Scott's question, City Manager Goss indicated approximately 400 referrals have been made to staff in the past year as compared to 200 the year before. 1. Mayor Cox commented on the lack of handicapped spaces on Third Avenue and the rationale of this oversight. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) refer this to staff to come back with a report. (The Council recessed to the Redevelopment Agency meeting at this time, 10:44 to 10:45 p.m..) The Council convened to Closed Session at 10:45 p.m.; the City Clerk was excused and the City Manager reported the session ended at 11:40 p.m. ADJOURNMENT AT 11:40 p.m. to the Council Conference on Thursday, March 27, 1986 at 4 p.m. and the meeting on Tuesday, April 1, 1986 at 4 p.m. 0763C/as STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Adele A. Sarmiento, being first duly sworn depose and say: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting Deputy City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista. That the reqular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, March 25, 1986, and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the Order of Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on Wednesday, March 26, 1986,at the hour of 4 p.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said meeting of March 25, 1986, was held. Deputy City Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this ,,"' ~ ~'~'- 19~ Notary Public in and for Sai.d~County and State of California MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held March 25, 1986 The City Council met in the Council Chamber of the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 p.m. with the following: Councilmen Present: Scott, McCandliss, Cox, Moore Councilmen Absent: Malcolm ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting until Thursday, March 27, 1986, at 4 p.m. in the Council ~onference Room, City Hall/ ~~~~ 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Adele A. Sarmiento, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of March 25, 1986 Deputy City Clerk City of Chula Vista, California