HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1983-11236
RESOLUTION NO. 11236
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES NO.2, CHULA VISTA TRACT 83-3
- PCS-83-3
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as
follows:
That in accordance with the attached Negative Declaration,
IS-79-12 ,and the findings therein, the proposed tentative map will
not have a significant impact upon the environment, and the City Council
hereby certifies that the Negative Declaration was prepared in accor-
dance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista
has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a subdivision to
be known as Hudson Valley Estates No.2 and has recom-
mended that the City Council approve said tentative map subject to the
conditions contained in Planning Commission Resolution No. PCS-83-3
adopted on the 27th day of April , 19 ~J , a copy
of which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof
the same as though fully set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve said tentative subdivision
map in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution No. PCS-83-3
Presen ted by
Approved as to form by
.I //
(. /~,
, ~ ~~<--zr / . ~ ~/L-t:~ '- J/'
Bud Gray, Di~ector of/Planning
'. .~/
. . ~.."
...._;?
/ :...:::~-A.LC'"U
'/
George ~: Lindberg,
CC+fl
I
Form No. 344
Rev. 7/82
:HULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this
83
9 , by the following vote, to-wit:
McCandliss,
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
17th day of May
~YES:
Councilmen
Scott, Cox, Malcolm, Moore
~AVES;
~BSTAIN:
~BSENT:
Councilmen
None
Councilmen
None
Councilmen
None
ITTE L ~a;~~
B' City' CI rk .'
K. a,
City of Chula Vista
iTATE OF CALIFORNIA )
:OUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s.
:lTV OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California,
10 HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 11236
,and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
IATED
( seal)
City Clerk
:C-660
COND 1"'- I ONAL
NEGAT1VE DECLARATiON
PROJLCT TITLE: HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES #2 SUBDIVISION
Project Location: NORTHERLY OF LAS FLORES AND SECOND AVE.
Project P::::-oponcnt: POLETTA SUE HUDSON
14 BARCELONA DR. RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 9227~
C\SE NO.
15-79-58
DATE: MAY 9, 1979
A. PROJECT SETTING
THE PROJECT INVOLVES 2.58 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE WESTERN
SLOPE OF A CANYON BETWEEN THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION OF LAS FLORES DR.
AND SECOND AVE. CURRENTLY THE SITE IS DEVELOPED WITH ONE SINGLE
FAMILY DWELLING, FRONTING ON SECOND AVE. AND SEVERAL SMALL, WOODEN
SHEDS LOCATED ON T~E SLOPE OF THE CANYON. ADJACENT USES INCLUDE
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES ALONG SECOND AVE., VACANT LAND TO THE NORTH,
SINGLE FAMILY HOMES TO THE EAST ALONG MINOT AVE. AND VACANT PROPERTY
ALONG THE EAST SLOPE OF THE CANYON, AND HORSE STABLES AND CORRALS
TO THE SOUTH ON THE ADJACENT WESTERN SLOPE OF THE CANYON.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS AN AVERAGE NATURAL SLOPE OF 15% AND MAXIMUM
SLOPE OF 6~%. RUNOFF FROM SECOND AVE. DRAINS DOWN THE CANYON WALL
TO THE FLOOR OF THE CANYON AND PROCEEDS NORTH TO THE SWEETWATER RIVER
FLOOR PLAIN. HOWEVER, ELEVATIONS (35 FT. ELEVATION AND BELOW) OF
THE SITE ARE WITHIN THE 1~~ YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND ARE SUBJECT TO
INUNDATION AND PROLONGED PONDING.
THE SITE IS COVERED WITH NATIVE VEGETATION AND MOST LIKELY SUPPORTS
WILDLIFE PERVALENT IN OPEN CANYON AREAS WITH LIMITED HUMAN ACCESS.
A LARGE GROVE OF MATURE EUCALYPTUS TREES IS LOCATED ON THE ~ASTERN
PORTION OF THE SITE WHICH EXTENDS EASTERLY AND SEVERAL LARGE CALIF.
PEPPER TREES ARE LOCATED IN THE ~ENTRAL PORTION OF THE PROPERTY.
THERE ARE NO KNOWN GEOLOGIC HAZARDS WITHIN THE PROJECT VICINITY,
HOWEVER, UNCOMPACTED FILL AREAS AND EXPANSIVE SOILS ARE PRESENT.
B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO SUBDIVIDE THE SUBJECT P~OPERTY INTO 6
SEPARATE PARCELS AND CONSTRUCT SIX SINGLE FAMILY HOMES. TWO LOTS
WILL FRONT ON SECOND AVE. AND THE REMAINING FOUR LOTS WILL FRONT
ALONG LAS FLORES DR. CONSTRUCTION PADS FOR THE FOUR DWELLINGS UNITS
TO BE LOCATED WITHIN THE FLOOR PLAIN WILL BE RAISED TO THE 36 FT.
ELEVATION ONE FOOT ABOVE THE 1~~ YEAR FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION. A 1~ FT.
WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND 18" CMP CULVERT WILL BE PROVIDED TO FACILITATE
STORM RAIN OFF INTO THE CANYON. DEDICATION OF LAND FOR STREET
PURPOSES AND ASSOCIATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE INSTALLED ON SECOND
AVE. AND LAS FLORES DR. SEWER HOOK-UP WILL CONNECT WITH THE SYSTEM
CURRENTLY BEING INSTALLED TO REPLACE THE ROSEBANK PUMPING STATION.
~'1 -//~S{;'
\
C. COMp,ATIBILITY WITH ZONING AND PLANS
THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION WILL RESULT IN A NET DENSITY OF 2.5 DUlAC
WHICH IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CURRENT R-I ZONING AND MEDIUM DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN.
D. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
1. SOILS
A SOILS REPORT PREPARED FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY~ INDICATES
THAT ON-SITE SOILS CONSIST OF LOOSE ALLUVIUM~ UNCOMPACTED FILL
AND TERRACE DEPOSITS. TO ENSURE STABLE CONSTRUCTION, RECOMMENDA-
TIONS AS STATED IN THE SOILS REPORT SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO
THE PROJECT.
2. NOISE
A NOISE ANALYSIS OF NOISE GENERATED BY VEHICLE TRAFFIC ON SECOND
AVE. WAS CONDUCTED. THIS ANALYSIS INDICATES THAT LOTS 1 AND 2
CAS DESCRIBED ON THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP), ADJACENT TO
SECOND AVE. WILL BE SUBJECTED TO UNACCEPTABLE NOISE LEVELS
GIVEN AN ESTIMATED 9~~~ ADT FOR SECOND AVE. IN 199~. A NOISE
ANALYSIS SHOULD BE CONDUCTED BY A QUALIFIED ACOUSTICIAN TO VERIFY
EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS AND SUBSEQUENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REDUCTION
OF EXTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (TO MEET A 45 DB INTERIOR NOISE
ISOLATION LEVEL) SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT.
3. LAND FORM AESTHETICS
THE PROJECT ENTAILS SUBSTANTIAL GRADING. TO REDUCE POTENTIAL
SILTATION AND INSURE AESTHETIC QUALITY, MANUFACTURED SLOPES
SHOPES SHOULD BE GRADED TO BLEND WITH THE EXISTING CONTOURS
OF THE NATURAL TOPOGRAPHY BY USE OF VARIABLE SLOPE RATIOS AND
ROUNDING OF TOP AND SIDE SLOPES. HYDROSEEDING AND OTHE~ PLANTING
WITH NATIVE MATERIALS SHOULD BE USED TO SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCE
AESTHETIC IMPACT OF LAND FORM CHANGE AND RETAIN A MORE RURAL
APPEARANCE AS WELL AS MINIMIZE WATER CONSUMPTION.
4. FLOOD HAZ,<^IRD
LOWER PADS AND LAS FLORES STREET IMPROVEMENTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN
THE SWEETWATER RIVER 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES
TO RAISE THE DWELLING PADS TO 1 FT. ABOVE THE FLOOD LEVEL TO AVOID
FLOOD HAZARD.
THE SEWER SYSTEM WILL HAVE TO BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE THE
INFLOW OF WATER DURING INUNDATION AND DESIGNED IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE FLOOD PLAIN ORDINAINCE.
IN ORDER TO ~AINTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE DWELLING UNITS,
THE TRAVEL LANES OF THE PROPOSED STREET WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
AT AN ELEVATION WHICH WILL RESULT IN ABOUT ONE AND ONE HALF FT.
OF INUNDATION DURING A 1~0 YEAR FLOOD AND HAVE NO PONDING
DURING A 10 YEAR FLOOD.
'--;>
1\-- 11&-3,6
(
5. SCHOOLS
LOCAL SCHOOLS ARE CURRENTLY OPERATING OVER CAPACITY. THE
FOLLOWING CHART CONTAINS THE MOST CURRENT SCHOOL ENROLLMENT
AND CAPACITY FIGURES AND NUMBER OF NEW STUDENTS ANTICIPATED DUE
TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT.
SCHOOL
ENROLLMENT
CAPACITY
NEW STUDENTS
FROM PROJECT
ROSE BANK
HILLTOP JR. HIGH
HILLTOP SR. HIGH
491
1404
1499
476
1440
1484
4
2
1
THE PROPONENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES POLICIES OF THE GENERAL PLAN. THIS WILL INCLUDE
THE SUBMISSION OF LETTERS FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
6. PARKS
THERE ARE CURRENTLY NO DEDICATED PARK FACILITIES WITHIN THE PARK
DISTRICT 2.01 WHERE THE PROJECT IS PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED.
GIVEN THE POPULATION OF THIS DISTRICT PARK ACREAGE REQUIREMENTS
IS 3.6 ACRES. BASED ON THE CITY'S PARK ACREAGE REQUIREMENT FACTOR
OF 2 ACRES/1000 POPULATION~ APPROXIMATELY .034 ACRES OF PARKLAND
WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SERVE THE PROJECT.
THE PROJECT PROPONENTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO PAY FEES IN LIEU OF
PARKLAND DEDICATION. THESE FEES WILL BE USED FOR THE PURCHASE
AND/OR DEVELOPMENT OF PARK FACILITIES IN THE AREA OF THIS PROJECT.
E. MITIGATION NECESSARY TO AVOID SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
1. RECOMMENDATIONS STATED WITHIN THE PREPARED SOILS REPORT
SHOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT.
2. AN ACOUSTICAL ANALYSIS SHOULD BE PREPARED AND SUBSEQUENT
RECOMMENDATIONS INCORPORATED INTO THE PROJECT.
3. GRADING AND HYDROSEEDING SHOULD BE ACCOMPLISHED AS DESCRIBED
IN SECTION 03 OF THIS NEGATIVE DECLARATION.
4. BUILDINGS PADS SHOULD BE RAISED ABOVE THE FLOOD PLAIN LEVEL
AND LAS FLORES DR. DESIGNED TO AVOID FLOOD DAMAGE.
THE SEWER SYSTE~ WILL HAVE TO BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE THE
INFLOW OF WATER DURING INUNDATION AND DESIGNED IN CONFORMANCE
WITH THE FLOOD PLAIN ORDINAINCE.
IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE DWELLING UNITS~
THE TRAVEL LANES OF THE PROPOSED STREET WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE
AT AN ELEVATION WHICH WILL RESULT IN ABOUT ONE AND ONE HALF FT.
OF INUNDATION DURING A 100 YEAR FLOOD AND HAVE NO PONDING
DURING A 10 YEAR FLOOD.
4<- (f 9 "sf
5. WRITTEN ASSURANCE OF CLASSROOM SPACE FROM THE APPROPRIATE
SCHOOL DISTRICT WILL BE REQUIRED.
6. PARK FEES WILL BE REQUIRED.
F. FINDINGS OF INSIGNIFICANT IMPACT
1. THE PROJECT WILL NOT REMOVE ANY SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION AND
THERE ARE NO KNOWN NATURAL OR MAN-MADE RESOURCES PRESENT.
BUILDING SITES WILL BE RAISED ABOVE THE 1~~ YEAR FLOOD PLAIN AND
RECOMMENDATIONS STATED WITHIN A PREPARED SOILS REPORT WILL BE
FOLLOWED TO MITIGATE SOILS AND SLOPE STABILITY RELATED IMPACTS.
AESTHETIC QUALITY OF RESULTING LAND FORM WILL ALSO BE ENSURED
BY PRESCRIBED MITIGATION.
2. THE PROPOSED SUBDIVISION IS IN BASIC CONFORMANCE WITH THE
LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN AND WILL NOT
ACHIEVE SHORT TERM TO THE DISADVANTAGE OF LONG TERM ENVIRONMENTAL
GOALS.
3. IMPACTS CAN BE MITIGATED AND NONE ARE ANTICIPATED TO OCCUR
WHICH COULD INTERACT TO CREATE A SUBSTANTIAL CUMULATIVE EFFECT
ON THE ENVIRONMENT.
4. CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED SIX UNITS WILL NOT RESULT IN
ANY SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN VEHICLE TRAFFIC NOR WILL ANY
APPRECIABLE INCREASE IN RELATED NOISE OR POLLUTANTS RESULT.
G. CONSULTAT~ON
1. INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
D. J. PETERSON
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
BILL ULLRICH
ASSOC. ENG.
TED MONSELL
FIRE CAPTAIN
GENE GRADY
DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & HOUSING
MERRITT HODSON
ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL COMMISSIONER
POlETTA SUE HUDSON - APPLICANT
2 . DOC UME~n S
EIR-78-1 HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES #1
IS-79-35 FUENTEZ PARCEL MAP
CHULA VISTA IMPROVEMENTS PLANS
--:->
~f\ - I , ) 3,G
The Initinl Study ^pplication and evaluation forms documenting the
findin~s of no signlficant impact are on file and available for rubl~c
review at the Chula Vista Plnnning Dept., 276 4th ^ve., Chula Vistn, C^.
A4-a/
ENVIR(D(~-lE~:Ti"\L REVIEI-] COORDli,Ji;TOR
E:-J 3
(rev. 5/77)
~/
~1'\- { I ~J3 b
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-83-3
RESOLUTION OF CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR HUDSON
VALLEY ESTATES NO.2, CHULA VISTA TRACT 83-3
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map
was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on March 3,
1983 by Poletta Sue Hudson, and
WHEREAS, said application requested permission to subdivide 2.35
acres into nine (9) lots, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing
on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of said hearing,
together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 300
feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the
heari ng, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised,
namely 5:00 p.m., April 27,1983 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue,
before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the Commission
significant environmental impacts
issued on IS-79-58.
found that the
and readopted
project would have no
the Negative Declaration
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION finds as
follows:
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative
subdivision map for Hudson Valley Estates No.2, Chula Vista Tract 83-3, is
found to be in conformance with the various elements of the City's General
Plan based on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for the residential development
and the proposal conforms to all standards establ ished by the
City for such projects.
2.
The design of the subdivision will not
improvements streets, sewers, etc.
designed to avoid any serious problems.
affect the existing
which have been
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista
General Plan Elements as follows:
?- II') 3k'
a. Land Use - The General Plan designates this site for Medium
Density Residential development (4-12 dwelling units per gross
acre). The proposed project density of 3.9 dwelling units per
acre is consistent with this designation.
b. Circulation - The development will extend Las Flores Drive in
conformance with General Plan standards.
c. Housing - Inasmuch as the subdivision contains fewer than 50
lots, it is exempt from the requ i rement to address the need to
provide 10% of the units for low and moderate income families.
d. Conservation Open Space, Parks and Recreation - None of the
areas proposed for conservation or open space on the vari ous
plan diagrams of the General Plan are affected by the subject
proposal. The developer will be assessed fees in lieu of park
land dedication.
e. Seismic Safety and Safety - The development is not adjacent to
any known fault systems. Extension of public improvements,
right-of-way widths, and turn-arounds meet or exceed element
standards. Although a portion of the property is within the
Sweetwater Valley 100 year flood plain, the preliminary grading
plan indicates dwelling units will be elevated above said flood
1 eve 1.
f. Noise - The lots will not be subject to objectionable noise
levels.
g. Scenic Highway - The site does not abut a Scenic Highway or
gateway.
h. Bicycle Routes - No bicycle routes are proposed on or adjacent
to this site.
k. Public Buildings - Public buildings are neither proposed nor
required on the site.
4. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
Commission certifies that it has considered the effect of this
approval on the housing needs of the region and has balanced those
needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City
and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends to the
City Counei 1 that. the tentative subdivision map for Hudson Valley Estates
No.2, Chula Vista Tract 83-3 be approved subject to the following conditions:
- 2 -
'"} .
~."K.. - II it '3b
1. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of full
street improvements in Las Flores Drive as shown on the
Tentative Map within the subdivision boundary and to a line 10
feet east of the centerline of said street along said portion.
The subdivider shall be responsible for dedicating 40 feet of
the 56 feet of ultimate right-of-way for Las Flores Drive within
and along the subdivision boundary prior to recordation of the
Final Map. The cul-de-sac radius shall be 50 feet instead of
the 48 feet shown on the Tentative Map.
2. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of
offsite improvements to provide access from 11011 Street to the
subdivision. Said improvements shall include, but not be
limited to: A.C. pavement 24 feet in width, AC dike, and street
lights. The subdivider shall be responsible for dedicating 30
feet of the 52 feet of ultimate right-of-way for Las Flores
Drive from 110" Street to the southerly subdivision boundary
prior to approval of the Final Map.
3. The developer shall obtain notarized letters of permission to
grade offsite prior to approval of the Final Map.
4. The developer shall dedicate an additional 4 feet of
right-of-way for street purposes to the City along Second Avenue
adjacent to lots 1 and 2.
5. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of the
storm drain in Las Flores Drive adjacent to the subdivision.
The developer shall also be responsible for the construction of
offsite drainage facilities as determined by the City Engineer.
The developer shall acquire and dedicate to the City, all
necessary offsite easements and right-of-way for the
construction and maintenance of the required drainage facilities
prior to approval of the Final Map. The developer may request a
reimbursement district and repayment diagram for those portions
of the storm drain which benefit other properties.
6. The owner sha 11 grant to the City easements for street tree
purposes to the City along Second Avenue and Las Flores Drive.
Easements shall be of sufficient width to provide for a total of
10 feet behind the sidewalk.
7. The grades on Las Flores Dri ve sha 11 be subject to approva 1 by
the City Engineer. Las Flores Drive shall be constructed at
such elevations as to be passable by vehicles during the 100
year .storm. The lowest habitable floor of each dwelling shall
be at least one foot above the 100 year water surface elevation.
8. The owner shall dedicate to the City, by grant deeds, one foot
control lots in Las Flores Drive as determined by the City
Engineer prior to approval of the Final Map.
- 3 -
~)
\,,- l (9 ~)[-
9. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days prior to
consideration of the Final Map by City Council if offsite
right-of-way or easement cannot be obtained as required by
conditions of approval. (Only offsite right-of-way or easements
covered by Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act are
covered by this condition).
After said notification, the developer shall:
a. Enter into an agreement to comp 1 ete ofts i te improvements
and pay the full cost of acquiring offsite right-of-way or
easements required by the conditions of approval of the
Tentative Map. The developer shall agree to complete said
offsite improvements at such time as the City acquires an
interest in the land which will permit the improvements to
be made. The developer shall provide surety for said
improvements at such time as the right-of-way or easement
is obtained by the City. The amount to be in accordance
with Code requirements.
b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said
ri ght-of-way or easements. Said estimate to be approved by
the City Engineer.
c. Have all easement and/or right-of-way documents and plats
prepared and appraisals complete which are necessary to
commence condemnation proceedings.
The requ i rements of a, b, and c above shall be accomp 1 i shed pri or to
approval of the Final Map.
All offsite reauirements which fall under the purview of Section
66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act will be waived if the City
does not comply l'lith th2 90 day time lirnitation specified in that
section of the Act.
10. The developer shall submit plans for the private driveway
serving lots 3, 8 and 9. The plan shall contain a typical
section, private sewer, finished centerline grade, and a profile
of the storm drain under the roadway.
11. The developer shall include in CC&R's for the subdivision,
provlSlons for maintenance of the private driveway, sewer
facilities, and parking areas, as well as a prohibition against
garage conversions for use as a habitable area for lots 4
through 7.
12. The Final Map shall indicate any required reciprocal access and
utility easement required by the City Engineer.
- 4 -
~t<- \ \ J -j1,
13. Should an assessment district be formed which includes
improvements and right-of-way required by conditions of approval
for this subdivision prior to Final Map approval, those
conditions shall be considered as fulfilled to the extent that
said required improvements are included in the district.
14. The developer shall install street lights along Las Flores Drive
as directed by the City Engineer and on Second Avenue at "C"
Street and in the cul-de-sac.
15. The developer shall establish joint access easements for the 21
foot wide drive area serving Lots 3, 8, and 9.
That a copy of th is reso 1 ut i on be transmitted to the owners of the
property and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
this 27th day of April, 1983 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners R. Johnson, Pressutti, G. Johnson, Shipe, Cannon and
O'Neill
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Green
~ /'"\.\ ~
/ \ ( ) i I
Ii I \ > . !
\, j( ",'vI \f'~ 01./u,,\
Roy R.;Johnson~ Chairman
I,)
ATTEST:
~.-c ~/ 4. ~
Ruth M. Smith, Secretary
WPC 0321P
- 5 -
1<- (I.~ 3;;
rr- .
-
^ve~ue.
.~~t--JD
..
~L"7.
&0'
__.'4"__
..' --.- ...4
. r. '.. I T ~"". ~ . ---~ ~---:-:"~~'-;~~~;-" "-;- J -;~.._--~: .' ~-_...- -
~
.~
..~
..... .. ~71
~I
. Q.-
-7 -~.'1:.TfiLl~' . . _ /.,
- ____L_ - - ---- .. --____... g,l...Op,... -----.... /. /
.. . '/:::!o. -1---. ___.or' . /
-. ~ I
"- _/_--~.
~- @
~~~ - 8 -
to;:) L:2 ~- .~
~~~
c.
~
-Inl
t"fA: 1'1.
~'
I~~'
.~
~
~~/
::J -~ .' @)
-' ~ ~ f-
1+ ~p It ·
~
~ @).
J
q
~ 11&'
11&' ?-I'
17t:t ~'
s::.
z:
(f) -0
@ \11_
.~ @ .1+
~
"
- ,-
. .
s. : t
--r-
\
~
~--=- ....:--:---
.,.
~ ~)- IIJ3b
f1
----~- -
"0<""
-._~~....~....-_--
Prl3....
I --<one
I
I
r--------.J
I
I
I
- (
I
I
SHRLEY S1:.
OS+~ I t'ttr1
.J
.H'.B.. C Street
')
~t
i,
~
f~
r!
ti
-
,--
,I.
.~
,iI
~
lJ
SF
SF
---r--
SF I
----I w.c
_SF__L___
..
SF
SF
1 ·
~--~
l -~ ~
t OiULA
SF
SF
ST. I
I <;'J:"" l-t'F-
~ "tor I
SF
/ SF
.
VISTA
e ..
. "
. ,
=
SF
e
I
,i 0
I _.
l
J0
.
TF
o
I
I I
'-___.J
: I
I I
I '
,
, I
, ,
o
. ..... ....
; ~ ~I\:t
f ::.
SF
LOCL1TOR
PCS-83-3
Ai
MINUTES OF A REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Wednesday, April 27, 1983
5:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Counc il Chambers
Public Services Building
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chairman R. Johnson, Commissioners Cannon,
G. Johnson, O'Neill, Pressutti and Shipe
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT:
STAFF PRESENT:
Commissioner Green
Director of Planning Gray, Principal
Planner Lee, Senior Civil Engineer Daoust,
Assistant City Attorney Harron, Secretary
Ruth Smith
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SILENT PRAYER
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Chairman Johnson and followed
by a moment of silent prayer.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
None.
1. PUBLIC HEARING
PCS-83-3 - CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
FOR HUDSON VALLEY ESTATES NO.2, CHULA VISTA TRACT
83-3 - SUE HUDSON
Principal Planner Lee informed the Commission that this is a resuhmittal of a
tentative subdivision map which expired in 1981 and comprises the division of
a 2-1/2 acre parcel into 9 lots. The site is located on the west side of the
e x ten s ion 0 f Las Fl 0 res Dr i ve a p pro x i ma tel y 1, 2 5 0 fee t nor tho f II 0 II .S t r e e t.
As aport i on of the property 1 i es withi n the 100- year f1 ood 1 eve 1 of the
Sweetwater River flood plain, it is planned to raise those lots a minimum of
1 foot above the flood level by use of fill material. It is also planned to
elevate Las Flores Drive to adhere to the stipulations in Negative Declaration
15-79-8. To eliminate resultant drainage problems to the adjoining
properties, the developer intends to fill not only the project site but the
abutting areas which are presently subject to inundation.
In response to a question hy Commissioner O'Neill, Senior Civil Engineer
Daoust replied that conditions added since the 1979 suhmitta1 of this
ten tat i ve map d e a ] t II a sic all y wit h 0 ff sit e rig h t s - 0 f - way 0 rea s e me n t s co v ere d
by the Subdivision Map Act which requires the City to ensure that any needed
o ff sit e rig h t s - 0 f - way for w hie hac qui s it ion t h r 0 ugh n ego t i a t ion fa i 1 she come
subject to condemnation procedures.
In reply to her question, Commissioner Johnson was informed that the
Residential Construction Tax fee did not include the school fee to each
district \oJhich, hased on a sliding scale, amounted to approximately $300 per
single family dwelling.
. -:>
1\ - I \9-3h
Planning Commission
- 2 -
Apri 1 27, 1983
The effect of the Sweetwater Flood Control project on the lOO-year flood
elevation in this area and the possibility of flooding of garage conversions
in the lower lots was raised by Commissioner G. Johnson. Mr. Lee pointed out
that a condition prohihiting any conversion of garages as a habitable area
(since they would be subject to inundation) could be added.
In reply to Commi ss i oner Cannon I s query about the parcel bei ng subject to the
Hillside Ordinance and the City's liability for flooding of the property as a
result of the Planning Commission's approval of a project involving sites
lying within the lOO-year flood plain, Assistant City Attorney Harron
indicated that the City would not he liable and Principal Planner Lee noted
that the area was not subject to the hillside district regulations.
Commissioner Cannon was also informed that under the present R-l zoning, the
Municipal Code has no provisions for saving the trees on the property.
This being the time and the place as advertised, Chairman Johnson opened the
public hearing.
Linda Navarro, 9 Second Avenue, expressed concern
in contrast to property sites already located in
that the minimum lot size was 7,000 square feet.
of lots resulted from the creation of the pan
allows utilization of the rear areas.
ahout the possible lot size
the area. She was assured
The increase in the numher
handle lot provision which
Timothy Connor, 4706 East Mountain View Drive, San Diego, identified himself
as the attorney for the applicant and declared his willingness to anS'W'ier any
questions. He stated he had no ohjections to any of the conditions.
There being no other speakers, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (O'Neill/Cannon) to find that this project will have no significant
environmental impacts and readopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS~79-58.
~lSUC (O'Neill/Shipe) that hased on the findings contained in Section "E" of
the staff report to recommend that the City Council approve the tentative
subdivision map for Hudson Valley Estates No.2, Chula Vista Tract 83-3,
subject to the conditions contained in the staff report with the additional
condition that garage conversions for use as a hahitahle area for those lots
which are within the lOO-year flood plain (Lots 4, 5, 6 and 7) be prohibited.
2. PUBLIC HEARING
PCA-83-1 CONSIDERATION OF AMENDr~ENTS TO THE
j'1UNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DEFINITION OF IFAt~ILY"
(COiHINUED)
Th is item was cant j nlJed from the P 1 ann i n9 Commi ss i on meet i n9 of March 9, 1983
to allow the City Attorney to prepare a revision to the proposed amendment of
the de fin i t ion 0 f " f ami 1 y " w hie h.'! 0 u 1 d pre v e n tor con t r 0 1 use s 5 u c has
fraternities and transient types of activities from locating in single-family
residential zones.
--;;
"K- 1\ '} 'j b'
Planning Commission
- 3 -
April 27, 1983
The Commission studied the three alternatives presented by the City Attorney's
office and discussed 1) the need for a definition of family, boardinghouse and
lodging house and 2) the advisability of retaining the Court's language.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was
opened. No one wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (G. Johnson/O'Neill) to recommend that the City Council enact an
ordinance amending the ~1unicipal Code by amending Section 19.040.032 as shown
in the staff report.
MS (G. Johnson/Pressutti) to recommend that the City Council enact an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code by amending Section 19.04.092 as shown
in the staff report.
The motion failed hy the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners G. Johnson, Pressutti, Shipe
NOES: Commissioners R. Johnson, O'Neill, Cannon
A B S E NT: Co mm i s s ion erG r e e n
MSC (O'Neill/Ca:lnon) to recommend that the City Council enact an ordinance
amending the Municipal Code by repealing Section 19.04.092.
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Shipe, R. Johnson, O'Neill, Cannon
NOES: Commissioners G. Johnson, Pressutti
ABSENT: Commi ss i oner Green
MSUC (G. Johnson/O'Neill) to recommend that the City Council enact an
ordinance amending the Municipal Code hy repealing Section 19.04.105, amending
Section 19.04.112, revising Section 19.28.040, and repealing Section 19.58.172
as shown in the staff report.
DIRECTOR'S REPORT:
Principal Planner Lee
ask e d i f the C 0 mm i s s ion '.v ish e d toe a n c e 1 the me e tin 9 0 f
May 1 1, 1 983 a s the r ewe r e n 0 i t e ms to he con sid ere d . The
Commission agreed.
s tat e d t hat a t t his time the r e was 0 n 1 yon e i t ems c he d u 1 e d
for the meeting of ,'~ay 25,1983 and suggested that the
:neeting he held at 5:00 instead of 7:00. The Commission
agreed and stated they were in favor of having meetings
containing a short agenda held at the earlier hour of 5:00.
~-
\\11.)/'
JIC-
stated there would he a dinner workshop on May 18, 1983 but
the agenda was not yet decided.
Planning Commission
- 4 -
April 27, 1983
Planning Director Gray
informed the Commission of the approval by the Coastal
Commission of the Sweetwater Flood Control project.
reported that hoth EastLake and the Gersten project were
moving ahead.
COMMISSION COMMENTS
Commissioner OINeill asked ahout the status of the Planning Director's
a p poi n t me n t . D ire c tor G ray s aid h e had d i s c u sse d t his with the Man age r but
the decision was not imminent at this point and he (Bud Gray) will be here
longer than anticipated.
ADJOURNMENT AT 5:50 p.m. to the Workshop Meeting of May 18, 1983 in Conference
Room 3 at 5: 00 p. m., and to the Regu 1 ar Bus i ness Meet i ng of May 25, 1983, at
5:00 p.m., in the Council Chamhers.
~ ./~ /')
><---,~.r-7. /~,...,,~
Ruth M. Smlth, Plannlng Commlsslon Secretary
WPC 0336P
~~
--K" \\G3,6
'~"__'~'''''_'~---_'''_----'''........,_.__...,.-....--........--.....~-""-"-",,,,-,,,,"-,-----."---.....'-"-......~,.-..., ..............-""'-