HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1996/04/25
Thursday, April 25, 1996
6:30 p.m.
1.
ROLL CALL:
"I decrare ",ncler penalty of perjury that I am
empio:\'ed b:! the City of Chula Vista in the
OUice of the City Clerk 8,1'.1 that I posted
this Agendaji'JoUce on the Bulletin Board at Council Conference Room
th:. Public ~ 'fvi es Buddin:; and a City Hall on City Hall Building
DA I ED~ ~//J/ !'? SiGNED / - ..-"
---
Special Joint MeetinglWor~sliop of
City of Chula Vista City Council.
Planning Commission. and
Growth Management Oversight Commission
CALL TO ORDER
Councilmembers Alevy _, Moot _, Padilla _' Rindone _, and
Mayor Horton _'
Planning Commissioners Davis _, Ray _, Salas _, Tarantino _,
Thomas _' Willett _, and Chair Tuchscher _'
Growth Management Oversight Commissioners Allen _, Armbrust _,
Dull_, Hyde _' Goerke _, Ray _, Peter _' Kell _' and
Chair Hubbard _
2.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Growth Management Oversight Commission Minutes from April 11,
1996 (GMOC members only).
3.
PUBLIC HEARING:
PCM-96-02; REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S 1995 ANNUAL REPORT
The GMOC's 1995 Annual Report on compliance with the City's Quality-of-Life
Threshold Standards focuses on the period from 7/1/94 to 6/30/95. Pertinent
issues identified in later 1995 and early 1996 are also included. The workshop
provides an opportunity to comprehensively review the Report's findings and
recommendations. Staff recommends that: (1) the Planning Commission accept
the 1995 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations as presented, and adopt
a motion recommending that the City Council do the same; and (2a) that Council
accept the GMOC's 1995 Annual Report and the recommendations contained
therein; and, (2b) that Council direct staff to undertake actions necessary to
implement those recommendations as presented in Attachment B - "1995 GMOC
Recommendations / Implementing Actions Summary".
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council/Planning
Commission/Growth Management Oversight Commission on any subject matter within their
jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law,
however, generally prohibits action being taken on any issues not included on the posted
agenda.) If you wish to address the Council/Planning Commission/GMOC on such a subject,
please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available
in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to
speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your
time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
Agenda
-2-
April 25, 1996
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to a Special Meeting of the Planning Commission on May 1, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council Chambers, and to a Special Workshop Meeting of the City Council on April 30, 1996 at 6:00 p.m.
in Conference Rooms 2 & 3 of the Public Services Building, and thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on
May 7, 1996 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
*****
*** COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT ***
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who
require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request
such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and
activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices
for the Deaf (TDD) (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Govermnent Code Section 54956, that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista has called and will convene a Special Joint Meeting/Workshop of the City Council, Growth
Management Oversight Commission, and Planning Commission on Thursday, April 25, 1996 at 6:30 p.m. in
the Council Conference Room, City Hall Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA.
~
f
,
SPECIAL JOINT MEETING
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL,
PLANNING COMMISSION AND
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
COUNCIL CONFERENCE AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J
Meeting Date 4/25/96
ITEM TITLE:
Review and Consideration of the Growth Management Oversight
Commission's (GMOC) 1995 Annual Report
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning Q t
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~ ~ ~\
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X )
On April 11, 1996, the GMOC finalized its 1995 Annual Report to the City Council regarding
compliance with the City's Quality-of-Life Thresholds Standards. The Report focuses on the
period from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995, although issues identified in the second half
of 1995 and early 1996 are also included where pertinent. The chairman's cover memorandum
to the Report provides a summary of the GMOC's findings and recommendations (please see
Attachment A). The workshop will give the GMOC an opportunity to discuss in detail the
Report's full findings and recommendations with the Planning Commission and City Council.
The GMOC is scheduled to commence its next review in October 1996, and will focus on the
period from July 1, 1995 to June 30, 1996.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
(1) That the Planning Commission accept the 1995 GMOC Annual Report and
recommendations as presented, and adopt a motion recommending that the City Council
do the same.
(2) That Council:
(a) Accept the GMOC's 1995 Annual Report and the recommendations contained
therein; and,
(b) Direct staff to undertake actions necessary to implement those recommendations
as presented in Attachment B - "1995 GMOC Recommendations 1 Implementing
Actions Summary".
3~1
Page 2, Item~
Meeting Date 4/25/96
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Planning Commission is
jointly participating in the workshop with Council, and will provide its comments and
recommendations at that time.
DISCUSSION:
Main Conclusions / Issues of the 1995 Annual Report
The GMOC approved their final 1995 Annual Report and recommendations on April 11, 1996.
In summary, the GMOC found the following with respect to Threshold Standard compliance as
presented in greater detail in Attachment A:
Thresholds in compliance -
Libraries
Drainage
Sewer
Water
Parks & Recreation
Schools
Traffic
Fiscal
Thresholds not in full compliance -
Police
Fire/EMS
Air Quality
With regard to the thresholds not found in full compliance, the following GMOC positions and/
or recommendations should be noted:
Police - Regarding non-compliance for the Police threshold, the shortfall continues to
be slight, and only related to one of the two measures for Priority I (emergency) calls
for service (CFS). The Priority II CFS Threshold was met and exceeded. As discussed
in the GMOC's report, although the shortfall was slight, the GMOC has concern since
this is the fifth consecutive year that the Police Department has been very close to
compliance, but has not fully achieved such. The Police Department continues to
implement a variety of operational and managerial changes which have resulted in ever-
improving threshold performance over the last three years. Based on this trend, the
Police Department's report indicates that they anticipate meeting compliance for the
7/1195 through 6/30/96 review period. Because similar indications have been given in
past years, but not fully achieved, the GMOC is recommending that should statistics for
the forthcoming review period continue to indicate non-compliance for the PI-CFS
J-.<
Page 3, Item~
Meeting Date 4/25/96
Threshold, the Police Department be required to include in their report to the GMOC,
an evaluation of why the slight deficiency in PI-CFS response continues to occur.1
Towards a more comprehensive evaluation of this and other police service delivery
considerations, the Police Department and the GMOC continue to stress the need to
purchase and install the proposed Computer Aided Dispatch/Records Management System
(CAD/RMS). Without such a tool, the GMOC understands that it will continue to be
difficult for the Police Department and the GMOC to understand new growth's influence
on maintaining the standard, and whether managerial and operational techniques can
resolve the matter, or whether a reevaluation of the threshold standard is warranted.
Fire/EMS - As presented in detail in previous GMOC reports, non-compliance for the
Fire/EMS threshold is attributable to a change in the manner of response time data
collection, and not the result of a reduction in fire service levels for Fiscal Year 1994-95.
In July 1992, new automated communications equipment was installed in the Dispatch
Center. That system now captures the actual total response time, including the call
intake and dispatch components. The result is that available threshold reporting statistics
now include time frames inconsistent with those represented in the present threshold
standard, and result in an inability to directly determine compliance.
Along with the Police Department, the Fire Department is also relying on the proposed
installation of the CAD/RMS to facilitate better management of resources, and to resolve
the present statistical inconsistencies in threshold response time measurement. Once the
CAD/RMS system has been operational for at least one year, the GMOC is again
recommending that the Fire/EMS Threshold (as well as that for Police) be reviewed for
possible revision. At least one year of CAD/RMS statistics are believed necessary in
order to produce reliable indicators and/or measurable results for use in the re-evaluation.
Air Quality - On Air Quality, the draft revision to the Threshold Standard is again being
proposed, and is presented in Appendix D to the 1995 Annual Report. That Appendix
is part of Attachment C to this agenda statement. The revision was initially presented
in last year's report, and given Council's conceptual approval, has now been reviewed
and supported by the APCD. Based on this, the GMOC is now recommending that
Council direct staff to promptly forward the amendment for formal adoption. Staff is
prepared to accomplish such, and will bring the amendment forward for public hearing
1 It should be recognized that growth is only one of several factors which may impact this
threshold; others being: (1) the proportion of the Police Department Budget devoted to
patrol vs. investigation/services; (2) the amount of Police Department calls for service
unrelated to growth, generated, say, by fluctuations in the economy; and (3) the
efficiency and operation of the dispatch/patrol function.
3'}
Page 4, Item~
Meeting Date 4/25/96
within the next 5 months, and prior to commencement of the next GMOC review cycle
as requested.
With regard to some of the thresholds found in compliance, the GMOC is also making several
recommendations which should be noted:
Library - The GMOC is again stressing the need to update the City's 1987 Library
Master Plan, to address future library funding, siting and timing issues with respect to
the Sweetwater/Bonita Community (Rancho del Rey site) and the Eastern Territories
Community (Eastlake and/or Otay Ranch site(s)). While the Library Director explained
that the proposed FY1997-98 update time frame is based on an existing site option within
the Eastlake Village Center, the GMOC is recommending that Council direct appropriate
staff to ensure that future library siting issues are fully considered as part of the current
EastLake Master Plan reevaluation effort. The GMOC sees a potential problem should
the present Village Center site be determined inadequate, and selection of a new site be
necessary, since the land planning re-evaluation will not necessarily be considering an
alternate site location. 2
Drainage - Installation of previously recommended drainage monitoring devices to
measure the effect of developments in eastern Chula Vista upon older infrastructure in
western Chula Vista, is proposed for the Telegraph and Poggi Canyon drainage basin as
part of the FY1996-97 CIP. The GMOC recommends approval of the project.
Sewer - Presently, there is considerable activity and effort occurring toward ensuring
the availability of adequate, cost-effective sewage treatment capacity to meet the long-
term needs for buildout of the City's General Plan Area. These efforts are also
strategically related to the future availability of reclaimed water. The GMOC is
requesting that Council continue to support and fund staff and consultive efforts, and that
more information about the status of these efforts, and related considerations, be included
in the next sewer threshold report to the GMOC in October 1996.
Parks and Recreation - Revision of the threshold to apply City-wide is again being
requested. In order to address previous comments regarding varying issues between
eastern and western Chula Vista, an amended draft version of a revised City-wide
standard (over that presented to Council last year) is presented in Appendix I to the
GMOC's 1995 Annual Report. That Appendix is part of Attachment C to this agenda
statement. The GMOC supports this draft, and, based on the relationship of information
in the forthcoming Parks Implementation Plan (PIP) to the standard's implementation
2 While the threshold standard for Libraries has been met and will be met for several
years, the GMOC recommendation reflects prudent planning which should be pursued
in any event.
3--1
Page 5, Item~
Meeting Date 4/25/96
provisions, the GMOC is recommending that Council direct staff to expeditiously
complete the PIP and to finalize the current, proposed amendment, and return both for
formal public hearing adoption in the Fall/Winter of 1996. Based on present schedules
for the PIP, staff believes this time table is feasible.
Schools - Now that the SourcePoint School Enrollment Impact Study has been
completed, the GMOC is requesting that Council and the Chula Vista Elementary School
District Board form a subcommittee to work with appropriate staff to evaluate the Study's
findings, and consider the development and adoption of appropriate mitigation strategies.
Regarding the Sweetwater Union High School District, the GMOC recommends that
issues regarding the funding, location and phasing of secondary schools to serve Salt
Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch be resolved as indicated in their report.
Traffic - The GMOC remains concerned over the longer-term outlook for threshold
compliance on H Street, both east and west of 1-805, as well as on other major arterial
street in eastern Chula Vista including Bonita Rd. and Telegraph Canyon Rd. Pursuant
to the Engineering Division's responses, the GMOC is requesting that 5 to 7 year
performance projections for major arterial streets (such as H S1.) be included as part of
future annual traffic threshold reports.
Fiscal - At present, several of the DIF's, and related facility master plans need to be
updated to include the Otay Ranch project, as well as to reflect changes in other
assumptions and cost factors. Given the important role of the DIP's in maintaining
compliance with Fiscal and other thresholds, and considering increasing budget pressures,
the GMOC is recommending that the Council ensure adequate staffing and fiscal
resources continue to be allocated so that the DIF's can be updated on a regular, periodic
schedule (every 1-2 years).
Affected departments and City Administration recognize, and agree with the need for
update of these plans. As a matter of fact, a condition to SPA I approval for the Otay
Ranch requires that the DIF be updated prior to approval of the first Final Map. Also,
the preliminary draft of one of the proposed Development Agreement in the Otay Ranch
also contemplates an update, especially of the Transportation DIF.
The GMOC's 1995 Annual Report, included as Attachment A, contains complete discussions on
each threshold topic. Related, specific recommendations for Council action may be found within
the report in bold italic print, and denoted by "." markings. To assist the Council in
evaluating and acting upon the Report's many recommendations, a more concise summary of
recommendations and proposed Council implementing actions is presented in Attachment B.
Staff requests that Council direct staff to implement those recommendations through actions as
outlined in the right hand column of Attachment B. Appendices to the 1995 Annual Report,
:J-~
Page 6, Item~
Meeting Date 4/25/96
presented in Attachment C, contain the threshold compliance reports presented to the GMOC
by City departments and outside agencies.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. As specific follow-up actions, such as the DIP and
facility master plan updates, are brought forward to City Council, fiscal analysis of these actions
will be provided.
Attachments:
A. Chairman's cover memo and GMOC 1995 Annual Report.
B. 1995 GMOC Recommendations / Implementing Actions Summary
C. Appendices to the 1995 Annual Report.
(GMOC-95\GM95-CC.RPT)
3-?
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 17, 1996
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Council
FROM: Tris Hubbard, Chairman
Growth Management Oversight Commission
SUBJECT: 1995 Growth Management Annual Report
The GMOC appreciates the support and assistance of the Planning
Department, and especially Ed Batchelder in the process of
developing this report. We compliment all the City Departments and
Community Agencies, involved in the GMOC process, for their
diligent effort to stick to the schedule that allowed us to begin
this year's review in October and conclude with our report to
Council in April.
Thresholds in Comoliance
Drainage
Fiscal
Libraries
Parks & Recreation
Schools
Sewer
Traffic
Water
Thresholds Not in Full Comoliance
Air Quality
Fire/EMS
Police
Budaet Imolications
To assist the City Council in its review and considerations of the
GMOC Report we highlight the following recommendations which have
budget implications: .
CAD/RMS System...As noted in our report we strongly recommend that
this system be purchased an implemented in the 1996-97 budget
cycle. The system will improve the efficiency of both police and
fire department personnel, as well as improving management control
and record keeping.
Master Planning...Availability, assignment, and work program
prioritization of department staff to develop master plan updates
for POlice, Fire and Library facilities needs to be addressed in
the 1996-97 budget cycle.
-======---- --
ATTACHMENT A
Development Impact Fees...To assure that DIF's maintain compliance _e
with Fiscal and other thresholds we recommend adequate staffing and
work program prioritization so that DIF's can be reviewed, and
up~ated as necessary, on a.regular periodic schedule (1-2 years).
Drainage Monitoring...Installation of recommended drainage
monitoring devices for Telegraph and Poggi Canyon drainage basin
should occur as part of 1996-97 Capital Improvement Program.
Traffic Monitoring...To assure longer term threshold compliance,
and the avoidance of traffic congestion in key traffic corridors
such as "H" street, Palomar, Telegraph Canyon and otay Valley Rd.,
the continuing provision of adequate staffing and budget to
monitor, and develop traffic projections is a critical need.
Park Implementation Plan... provision for internal work program
priority to assure completion of the PIP, and related study of
eastern territory park issues, by the end of 1996.
Threshold Summary
The text of the GMOC report and council Conference Agenda statement
provide the detail of our report and, therefore, this summary
statement will be brief. Air Quality non-compliance will primarily
be resolved with the adoption of the proposed threshold revision.
In addition the city is taking very positive steps to continue to
improve air quality.
police and Fire Department thresholds continue to be out of
compliance. As noted, the degree of non-compliance is slight,
however the non-compliance has continued for a period of 5 years in
spite of limited growth. In that the city is projecting
considerable growth in the east over a large geographic area, we
have concern that threshold compliance may be further jeopardized.
Therefore the implementation of the CAD/RMS is quite critical to
improved efficiency of department'personnel and better monitoring
of services.
_.
M:\ho..\pl.nn1ng\.o\tr1.....
--
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1995 REPORT
SUBMITTED
APRIL 1996
Attachment A
.-,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1995 REPORT
Commission Members
Tris Hubbard, Chairman (Education)
James Kell, Vice Chairman (Eastern Territories)
Will T. Hyde (Environmental)
Chuck Peter (Business)
John Ray (Planning Commission)
Mike Armbrust (Center City)
Elizabeth Allen (Montgomery)
C. Lynn Dull (Sweetwater)
Glen Goerke (Development)
-
Staff
Edgar Batchelder, Senior Planner
April 1996
-
,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
'.
Tooic
Introduction
Review Process
Development Forecasts
Threshold/Annual Review Summary
Annual Review of Thresholds
Thresholds Reflectina Non-Compliance
Police
Fire/EMS
Air Quality
Thresholds Reflectina Compliance
Libraries
Drainage
Sewer
Water
Parks and Recreation
Schools
Traffic
Fiscal
Paae
1
2
2
5
6
9
12
15
16
18
20
24
26
31
34
LIST OF APPENDICES
..........,,<
ADDendix
A. Police Department Memorandum
B. Fire Department Memorandum
C. APCD and City Environmental Resource Manager Communications
D. Draft Revised Air Quality Threshold Standard
E. Library Memorandum
F. Engineering Drainage and Sewer Report
G. Water District Communications
H. Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum
I. Draft Revised Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard
J. School District Communications
-
K. Engineering Traffic Reports and Memoranda
L. Finance Department Memorandum
M. Development Forecast Information
.,
-
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1995 REPORT
April 12, 1996
INTRODUCTION
In November 1987, through the input of citizens and developers, the City Council adopted
the Threshold/Standards Policy for Chula Vista. The policy addresses eleven public
facilities and services, and each is discussed in terms of a goal, objectives, "threshold" or
standard, and implementation measures. The standards form the backbone of an overall
growth management program for the City which has evolved since 1987 through adoption
of a Growth Management Element of the General Plan in 1989, and a Growth Management
Program document and implementing ordinance in 1991. Adherence to these Citywide
standards is intended to preserve and enhance both the environment and residents'
quality-of-Iife as growth occurs.
To provide an independent annual City-wide Threshold/Standards compliance review, a
Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) was created. The GMOC was
originally appointed by the City Council in the summer of 1988. It is composed of nine
members representing a geographical balance of residents, as well as a cross section of
interests including education, environment, business and development. There is also
representation from the City Planning Commission. In April of 1991, the City Council
changed the designation of the Committee to a full City Commission.
The GMOC's review is structured around a fiscal year cycle. The intent is to accommodate
City Council consideration of GMOC recommendations which may have budget
implications. The official review period for this report is July 1. 1994 through June 30,
1995. although pertinent issues identified during the second half of 1995 and early 1996
are also addressed as necessary. The next GMOC review period is scheduled to begin
in October, 1996. and will address the period from July 1. 1995 through June 30, 1996.
In conducting its annual review, the GMOC's responsibilities include the following:
a determination of whether the thresholds have been complied with on both a
project and cumulative basis over the prior year;
whether compliance is likely to be maintained based on both short-term and long-
term development forecasts;
whether each threshold is appropriate for its goal;
whether any new thresholds should be adopted for any issues;
whether any issues should be added to or deleted from the threshold group;
whether the City has been using developer fees for the intended purpose;
what the fiscal impact of threshold compliance may be; and
whether the means of compliance are appropriate and being 'achieved.
1
--
Development projects in Chula Vista are required to demonstrate that the Threshold
Standards ~i11 be maintained as growth occurs. Each project is reviewed, and
appropriately conditioned to assure that needed facilities and services are in place in
advance of, or concurrent with, proposed development. This requirement promotes the
continuation of a high quality-of-Iife 'for existing as well as future City residents.
-
REVIEW PROCESS
The Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) held a series of 11 meetings
from November 1995 through April 1996. The Commission spent the first meeting
reviewing the City Council's actions on their 1994 Annual Report and recommendations,
and in reviewing the established thresholds, Commission responsibilities, and the status
of City-wide development as an orientation. The next 7 meetings were spent reviewing
threshold reports submitted by both individual City departments and external agencies, and
in determining the status of compliance. Presentations were made by representatives of
the Sweetwater and Otay water districts, Chula Vista Elementary and Sweetwater Union
High School Districts, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, and City staff
including Public Works, Traffic Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Library, Fire, Police,
Finance, and Planning. The GMOC also reviewed whether or not it was appropriate to
issue a "statement of concern" or to make other recommendations regarding each
threshold. Following completion of the individual threshold reviews, the GMOC prepared
and adopted this annual report to the Planning Commission and City Council.
DEVELOPMENT FORECASTS
........,.,."
The Threshold/Standards Policy calls for the City to prepare both short-range (12 to 18
month) and mid-range (5 to 7 years) development forecasts at the beginning of the annual
GMOC review process. Complimentary to threshold performance evaluation, which
reviews the prior year period, these forecasts serve to provide a common basis by. which
the GMOC, staff and external agencies can identify and address any potential threshold
issues before a problem arises. Over the years, the City has adjusted its forecasting
approach to be more cognizant of sub-regional development patterns and forecasts, such
as SANDAG's Series 8, which could influence infrastructure and services within the City's
Planning Area. A copy of this year's forecast information is included as Appendix M and
summarized below.
-
2
12-18 Month Forecast
The 12-18 month forecast is the main set of development projections upon which the
annual threshold reviews are based. The intent in preparing this forecast is to focus on
that near-term, more imminent development which will place demands on available
infrastructure and services. As such, the forecast derives largely from a survey of local
developers and builders as to their anticipations, and from a review of associated levels
of development under processing by the City including design review, subdivision maps,
plan checks and building permits.
Two tables are used in Appendix M to present the forecast figures; one for the Otay Water
District area which encompasses new development east of the 1-805 freeway, and one for
the Sweetwater Authority area which encompasses mostly infill development in older areas
of the City west of 1-805. The figures cover the 18-month period from July 1995 through
December 1996, and are intended to present a "worst-case" condition which allows
evaluations of the maximum anticipated demands on infrastructure and services. In
accordance with the tables, approximately 1911 housing units are anticipated to be
authorized for construction, and 1549 housing units are anticipated to reach occupancy
within the Otay District. For the Sweetwater Authority area, the 18-month projections are
for 65 housing units to be authorized for construction, and 49 units to reach occupancy.
This equates to annualized averages on a City-wide basis of 1317 housing unit
authorizations, and 1066 housing unit occupancies.
By comparison, these annualized, ''worst case" rates are consistent with historic annual
averages for the City since 1980. While this may be reflective of an optimistic turn in
development outlook toward recovery from the recession of the early 1990's, it is atypical
of recent, actual experiences. During 1994 and 1995, actual residential development
activity levels were about one half of the average annual levels experienced during the
mid- to later 1980's when development was at a high point. In general, most current
economic thinking indicates that the housing market will not recover until about 1997, and
then not to the growth rate levels seen in the later 1980's.
5-7 Year Forecast
The City's intent in preparing the mid-range (5-7 year) forecast is to provide sufficient
foresight as to any perceived, potential growth management issues before they become
a problem. In addition, this mid-range forecast is also intended to take into consideration
other factors at the regional and sub-regional level which may influence growth within the
City. Therefore, the City has revised its approach in recent years to coordinate with
SANDAG's "Series" growth forecasts to further improve forecasting methodology consistent
with the regional and sub-regional models, and to allow for easier and more consistent
updates of these forecasts. In doing so, the same assumptions utilized in SANDAG'S
Series 8 Interim Forecast have been applied to the City's forecast for the 1995-2000 time
frame. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, population and economic trends,
and infrastructure needs.
3
As indicated in the third table in Appendix M, the average annual number of housing units
anticipated for construction City-wide during the 1995-2000 time frame is approximately
910 units per year. This number takes into consideration development in the first phases
of Otay Ranch which is anticipated to commence construction in 1997, as well as known
facility capacity limitations, particularly those related to traffic circulation such as State
Route 125.
--
While a majority of the forecast is attributable to growth in eastern Chula Vista, the above
figures include approximately 100 dwelling units per year of infill development in western
Chula Vista (Sweetwater Authority area), based primarily on an analysis of historic trends.
-
-
4
~
c(
:IE
:IE
::)ID
enS!!
~~
WCD
>%
WC)
a::::)
....0
c(a::
::)%
Zt-
IDZ.....
G')c(G')
G').;::
... -
en....
Cc
a:: 0
c(-
ca::
ZW
c(D.
t-~
enw
c-
....>
OW
% a::
en
w
a::
%
t-
C
..10 W
<..Jwo
1=0"z
z:z::zw
wenC.
I-w:z::.
Oa:uO
A.~ :d
a:
en
OU~W
Zl=wU
<U-~
t:~O:J
00<A.
OZO.
<::::>>1-0
u. U
u.,
OO~O W
t-I-IDI-~U
ffi~iii>w~
.wzu-:J
w(Joz~D.
t-zD.w....
c(0f3"<0
I-ua:c (J
en
W
..JO(J
<zz
1=0c
ZZ::i
Wa:D.
I-o~
ou.,o
D. (J
&0
OW
..JU
o~t-
:z::-w
en..J~
WD.
a:.
~8
~ .J::.
D)
~ :E
., c
€ E 0
1i ., c
c iii
0 0 ::;)
~ 'C
1i = i ..
.. I
w < is ! :;
::;) .. .. g
en .s .s a: ..
~ ~ I I '5
" .J::.
en I ., c CJ en
. ii D) >- .. .
., W :I 'C .. .. .. 8 ~ 1 u ii
oS! '! a (! c I .s ~
e en .c u
'0 .. .I:l . .
c .. u
D. ii: :J c en .. .a D. en .. .a l- ii:
0 .
. N .-) ..t .,; ut ...: cD Gi ....
.... .... ....
-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THRESHOLDS-
-
THRESHOLDS REFLECTING NON-COMPLlANCE
a POLICE -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE
POLICE THRESHOLD STANDARD FOR PRIORITY I CALLS FOR SERVICE
(CFS). ALTHOUGH THE SHORTFALL WAS AGAIN SLIGHT.. THE GMOC
EXPRESSES CONCERN SINCE THIS IS THE FIFTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR IN
WHICH THE PI-CFS STANDARD HAS NOT BEEN FULLY MET. DESPITE A 1.2%
DECREASE IN CFS VOLUME OVER THE LAST YEAR. AND AN OVERALL
INCREASE IN PATROL STAFFING.
STANDARDS FOR PRIORITY II CFS WERE AGAIN MET AND SURPASSED.
The GMOC is concerned over the continued PI CFS deficiency despite continued
increases in patrol staffing, and the overall reduction in CFS volume. As stated in
prior years, the Police Department has been implementing a variety of operational
and managerial changes since its present administration took over in 1991. Many
of those changes are designed to improve call-for-service (CFS) response
performance, and intended to address noa-conformance with the Police Threshold
Standard. Despite commendable efforts on the part of the Department to effect
community based policing, and other significant managerial and deployment tactics,
the Police Department continues to not meet full compliance with the PI-CFS
Standards as evidenced by the following statistics:
....-....
Priority I Calls for Service (PI CFS)-
Period
Response Time
w/in 7 minutes
Reported
Av. Resc. Time
Threshold
FY1992-93
FY1993-94
FY1994-95
84.0%
84.2%
85.4%
84.9%
4:30
4:44
4:35
4:37
Priority II Calls for Service (PII CFS)-
Response Time
Period wlin 7 minutes
Reported
Av. Resc. Time
Threshold
FY1992-93
FY1993-94
FY1994-95
62%
64.2
63.5%
63.4%
7:00
6:33
6:48
6:39
-...
6
While the GMOC considers the PI CFS shortfall to be a modest deficiency, we
none-the-Iess remain concerned since this is fifth consecutive year in which Police
performance has been very near, but below, the minimum acceptable standard.
Based on oral presentations, the GMOC believes extension of police services into
the expansive eastern area of the city may actually be having a negative impact on
the ability to meet Priority I threshold response times. This is mainly attributable to
topography (canyons, etc.), the resulting winding, loop roads and cul-de-sac streets,
and the fact that several of the major north/south connections to the eastlwest
arterial street system are not in place.
It is difficult for the GMOC to specifically pinpoint causes and/or recommend
remedial actions. There was no conclusive evidence presented to indicate that the
P1-CFS Threshold deficiency is attributable to new growth. In this regard, the
Police Department continues to indicate that present dispatch and record keeping
systems do not enable data management in a fashion which can readily quantify
whether increases in CFS are growth related. Since adequate tools do not exist to
conduct an evaluation of these eastern Chula Vista conditions, and their actual
affect to response times, purchase and installation of the full Computer-Aided
Dispatch Records Management System (CAD/RMS) is crucial to evaluating police
efficiency. The GMOC therefore recommends:
· That the City Council aggressively support the timely purchase,
installation and operation of the proposed CAD/RMS by directing
staff to develop viable funding proposals for Council action as
part of the FY 1996-97 budget submittal.
As of the time of this report's preparation, the GMOC understands that two
successful bidders for the CAD/RMS project (PS-115) have been identified, and are
reviewing various component and cost information per the City's request. City staff
and Administration are continuing to evaluate funding proposals. While this
represents progress, the GMOC would, however, like to stress the need to expedite
vendor selection, and to purchase and install the CADIRMS during FY1996/97. The
GMOC has been faced with the P1-CFS non-compliance for five years already, and
at least one year of CAD/RMS statistics will be needed to enable the GMOC's
review. Therefore, if the CAD/RMS is not in place promptly, there may be several
more years of non-compliance before the GMOC has enough information to
adequately address the issue.
As noted last year, once better data is available through the CAD/RMS, re-
evaluation of the threshold standard is warranted. In order to produce worthwhile
indicators and/or measurable results for Llse in the reevaluation, it is anticipated that
at least one year of CADIRMS statistics will be necessary to determine if current
issues influencing police performance can be solved through managerial
techniques, or if an alteration of the current Standard is warranted. Therefore, the
GMOC recommends:
7
-
==----
.
That re-evaluation of the Police Threshold Standard occur
approximately one year subsequent to the implementation of the
CAD/RMS system.
--
In the interim, and in order to better anticipate if non-compliance will continue, and
to accordingly adjust resources to hopefully preclude it from happening, the GMOC
recommends:
. That the Police Department be required to provide the City
Council with semi-annual compliance evaluations for the Priority
I CFS portion of the Police Threshold Standard.
In addition to this semi-annual reporting, the GMOC further requests that:
. Should monitoring statistics for the forthcoming review period
(7/1/95 - 6/30/96) be indicative of continued non-compliance for
the PI-CFS Threshold, that the Police Department be 'required to
include in thier report to the GMOC, an evaluation of why the
slight deficiency continues to occur.
As regards the longer-term outlook, the GMOC recognizes that it will continue to be
difficult for the Police Department and the GMOC to determine whether threshold
performance issues will continue to exist without the CAD/RMS. It is also difficult
to determine how best to structure and manage police resources in combating crime
and maintaining appropriate service levels for a growing city, both population and
geographic-wise. Several large projects in eastern Chula Vista will be undergoing
major planning activities over the next year, among them EastLake, San Miguel
Ranch and Otay Ranch. As the City grows and expands to the east and south, it
is becoming increasingly necessary to consider how best to deliver services to
those extending geographic areas in an efficient and timely manner.
~"
The GMOC is aware of recent discussion of ideas and issues regarding potential
future expansion of police facilities and services. However, to our understanding,
this is occurring absent anything to formally evaluate or direct those efforts to a
result, such as a strategic or master plan. This is true despite ongoing development
planning and approvals in eastern Chula Vista which are effecting the physical and
social environment in which the services will ultimately be delivered. As noted
earlier, one example is the layout and street configuration in eastern Chula Vista
which are having an affect on response times. Additionally, by way of comparison,
Police is one of the only thresholds which does not have the more-or-Iess standard,
forward looking master plan. Presently, the "plan" for police facilities is part of the
City's Civic Center Master Plan, which assumes that the police facility will remain
in its present location, and thereby does not address planning issues with respect
to extending services and facilities to a growing and geographically expanding city.
Therefor~. the GMOC recommends:
--
8
.
That the City Council direct staff of appropriate City
Departments, and allocate the necessary resources and budget
In FY1996-97, to commence preparation of along-range strategic
plan for the future delivery of police services to the expanding
eastern area of the City consistent with threshold standards.
This plan should address expansions and/or changes In the level
and methods of deployment, as well as any needed or desirable
physical facility expansions, and/or relocations.
Beyond the CAD/RMS proposal and updating the master plan for police facilities,
the Police Department should be recognized and commended for continuing to
expand on a multi-faceted proactive policing effort under the well-grounded
philosophy that it is more effective in the long run to prevent, crime than to respond
to calls-for-service. In this light, the GMOC recommends:
· That the City Council continue to actively support the further
expansion of proactive community policing efforts such as the
School Resource Officer, .Community Resource Officers and the
Senior Volunteer Patrol.
Given the apparently related CFS decrease, coupled with growing fiscal constraints
to significantly expanding the police force, the GMOC believes that this emphasis
to proactive, crime preventative policing may prove to be a significant component
in maintaining police thresholds over the longer term.
D FIRE/EMS -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FIRE/EMS THRESHOLD STANDARD. THIS NON-COMPLlANCE IS ATTRIBUTED
TO CHANGES IN THE MANNER OF DATA COLLECTION. AND NOT A
REDUCTION OF FIRE SERVICE LEVELS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1994-95. THE
GMOC IS STILL CONCERNED. HOWEVER. SINCE THIS IS THE THIRD
CONSECUTIVE YEAR IN WHICH THE CURRENT SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT
DOES NOT AFFORD A DIRECT EVALUATION CONSISTENT WITH THE
STRUCTURE OF THE PRESENT FIRElEMS THRESHOLD.
The Fire/EMS Threshold Standard requires that 85% of all emergency fire and
medical calls be responded to within 7 minutes. Response statistics presented for
Fiscal Year 1994-95 indicate that only 82% of all emergency calls were responded
to within 7 minutes (3% less than the standard). 85% of the calls were responded
to within 7 minutes, 16 seconds (16 seconds over standard).
As outlined in greater detail in last year's report (1994), this apparent non-
compliance continues to result from statistical inconsistencies in the manner in
which the present automated system records total call response time. The present
9
'>
standard allocates a flat 30 seconds for call dispatch, not the actual time for call
intake and disDatch. as is now recorded by the new communications equipment
installed in the Dispatch Center in July, 1992. This could be adding 20 to 60
seconds to overall response time per call, and causing the statistical non-
compliance indicated above. The Fire Department continues to emphasize that the
turnout and travel time components of response remain largely unchanged from
prior years, illustrating that delivery of fire and emergency medical services has not
deteriorated. In addition, the Fire Department continues in its efforts to maximize
performance and minimize response times.
.............
As the GMOC understands, since tools do not exist for an adequate evaluation
consistent with the present standard, purchase and installation of the full Computer-
Aided Dispatch Records Management System (CAD/RMS) is necessary to maximize
dipatcher performance, decrease dispatch times, and to enable the Fire Department
to properly evaluate. its response time performance. This evaluation is needed in
part to correct present statistical inconsistencies, as well as to provide a true and
accurate measurement of compliance with the present standard, in order to
determine whether any changes to the Threshold Standard are needed. Given the
significance of the CAD/RMS system to both the Police and Fire Department, the
GMOC recommends:
.
That the City Council aggressively support the timely purchase,
installation and operation of the proposed CAD/RMS by directing
appropriate staff to develop viable funding proposals for Council
action as part of the FY 1996-97 budget submittal.
.-.
The GMOC strongly re-emphasizes its understanding that if only existing systems
remain in place, there will be a continuation of the present inability to evaluate
threshold performance consistent with the provisions ofthe current standard. Again,
given the aforementioned beneficial information the CAD/RMS system will provide,
the GMOC also recommends:
· That re-evaluation of the FirelEMS Threshold Standard occur
approximately one year subsequent to Implementation of the
CAD/RMS.
In response to last year's recommendation to commence update of the City's Fire
Station Master Plan, the Fire Department indicated in its report that due to staffing
and budget considerations, it may be three to five years before a full and exhaustive
update would take place. Similar to issues raised under the Police discussion,
however, both the GMOC and the Fire Department recognize that several large
projects in eastern Chula Vista will be undergoing major planning activities during
the next year. This includes remaining areas of EastLake, as well as neighboring
San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch.
-.
10
Given this, the Fire Department's report indicates the urgency to immediately
undertake an interim update of the Fire Station Master Plan. This stems largely
from the need to locate permanent Fire Station #6 (Interim station #6 is located in
the EastLake Business Park area), and to address potential coverage and threshold
response issues between the Sunbow and Otay Ranch SPA One projects, and the
Salt Creek Ranch, Salt Creek IISan Miguel Ranch projects. In both instances, the
projects in which the existing Fire Station Master Plan and City General Plan
indicate station location (Sunbow and Salt Creek Ranch), have been stalled due to
financial problems.
While the GMOC recognizes that a full and comprehensive Fire Station Master Plan
update may take a number of years to complete, we also understand and concur
with the immediate needs, and therefore recommend:
· That the City Council direct staff of the Fire, Planning and other
appropriate City Departments to promptly commence preparation
of the Interim Fire Station Master Plan Update as has been
proposed, and ensure that necessary priority is given, so that the
effort may be completed by the end of 1996.
This timetable is intended to ensure that FirelEMS Threshold-related planning
matters can be sufficiently addressed, and appropriate conditions established
through the Public Facility Financing Plans (PFFP's), in conjunction with master
planning reviews for Eastlake, Otay Ranch, and San Miguel Ranch which are being
processed in that same general time window.
Beyond the above noted Interim Update effort, it is the GMOC's position that as the
City grows and expands to the east and south, it is becoming increasingly
necessary to consider how best to deliver services to those extending geographic
areas in an efficient and timely manner. Therefore, the GMOC:
· Continues to emphasize the need to conduct a full and complete
update of the City's '1989 Fire Station Master Plan within the next
3 years. '
Such a schedule is viewed as necessary so that the full update may be initially
considered as part of FY1996-97 budget deliberations, to ensure that the update is
actually to be completed and adopted within the next three years.
11
~ r,-'
L.. "'--'
-
a AIR QUALITY -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT DESPITE CONTINUED OVERALL IMPROVEMENT IN
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY. THE SAN DIEGO REGION STILL DOES NOT MEET
STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR QUALITY. AND THEREFORE.
TECHNICALLY IS OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE PRESENT THRESHOLD
STANDARD. THE GMOC. HOWEVER. FURTHER FINDS THAT A "STATEMENT
OF CONCERN" IS UNWARRANTED.
First and foremost, it should be noted that the GMOC received reports and oral
presentations under the spirit of the proposed, revised Air Quality Threshold
Standard included with last year's report. Even though the revision has yet to be
formally adopted, the GMOC concurred that the reporting under the new standard
would be much improved.
Based on the trial reports and presentations pursuant to the proposed, amended Air
Quality Threshold, both the GMOC and the APCD find that the draft (as presented
in Appendix D) appears well-reasoned and innovative, and forms a workable and
logical foundation for annual progress/compliance reporting on air quality
improvements efforts at the local and regional level. Given this, and Council's
favorable response to the proposed amendment (initially presented with last year's
[1994] GMOC Report, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council direct appropriate City staff to promptly
initiate formal review and adoption proceedings for the proposed
Air Quality Threshold Standard revision. The GMOC further
requests that adoption occur prior to September 1996, so that the
revision will be in full effect prior to commencing the next
threshold review cycle in October 1996.
~,
As noted above, the GMOC this year received reports and presentation from both
the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (APCD), and the City's
Environmental Resource Manager. Under the new threshold standard, the focus
of both reports was towards those activities and efforts being undertaken regionally
and locally to improve air quality, regardless of whether the San Diego Region is
presently in or out of compliance with regard to a number of State and Federal
criteria pollutants. The GMOC believes that the new focus is a better, and more
realistic and measurable approach to ensuring air quality improvement, especially
since Chula Vista cannot improve its air quality separate from the regional air basin,
and the fact that import pollution from the Los Angeles basin will continue to affect
our ability to comply with State and Federal standards for the foreseeable future.
As an example, 10 of the Region's 12 days federal standards violation days during
1995 were directly attributable to Los Angeles import. A summary of air quality
conditions for 1995 is presented in the following table:
-
12
San Diego Region
Chula Vista
39
3
14
1
12
o
The APCD continues to note that Chula Vista enjoys some of the best .air quality in
the Region, and applauded the City for its leadership efforts in local air quality
improvement activities. The GMOC was also impressed by the amount and
diversity of air quality improvement activities being undertaken through the office of
the City's Environmental. Resource Manager. Following is an overview of these
activities, which were also highlighted in the Mayor's recent State of the City
Address:
Development of a C02 Reduction Plan as part of an international
consortium, to serve as a model of community-based progressive
environmental initiatives for other cities. Chula Vista is the first city in the
State to have developed such a plan.
Smogbusters Alternative Fuel Rebate Program which is the first municipal
program in the U.S. to provide cash rebates to local citizens and businesses
for replacing gasoline powered vehicles to electric or Compressed Natural
Gas (CNG).
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Project which will place three state-of-the-art buses into
service in place of three diesel buses.
Chula Vista Telecenters. The City has opened two such centers which allow
local residents to conduct work from the centers without the need to
commute to their normal place of work. Additionally, the City has initiated a
distance learning program for college courses in conjunction with both
National University and the University of Phoenix.
Participation as a model city in the SMART Communities program, which
focuses on automating city services to enable residents and local business
to conduct city business from their home or workplace.
13
Chula Vista's Business for an Environmentally Sustainable Tomorrow (BEST)
Awards program to provide local business with awards and recognition for
energy efficiency and conservation efforts.
-
Employee VanPool Program which will place three CNG vans i~to service to
drive employees from their homes to City Hall and back, reducing vehicle
miles traveled and air pollution.
Several other matters were addressed in APCD's presentation regarding the current
activities of the APCD as they may affect the City in the future, as follows:
Recent completion of its Triennial Update of the Regional Air Quality Strategy
(RAQS) to address compliance with State standards.
The State Implementation Plan (SIP) is nearing Federal EPA approval, and
through its programs, projects that the Region will attain federal standards
by 1999.
Adoption of the Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credit (MERe) Rule
enabling businesses to offset new or increased emissions from stationary
sources (factories, etc.) with credits from reducing mobile sources in their
fleets, etc.
Establishment of the Indirect Source Program as a voluntary program for -
local jurisdictions to receive technical assistance on amending the local
General Plan and/or other local land use plans to reduce bias against
walking, and promote design which encourages biking and the use of transit.
APCD will produce a set of General Plan guidelines by the end of 1996.
Working toward implementation and enforcement of the Border Vehicle
Program to address issues involved with implementing AB2008, which
extends emission control requirements to vehicles from Mexico used in
commuting to work in California. APCD is working to establish better
controls and enforcement mechanisms, and Representative Bilbray has filed
a bill to fund a study of border vehicle emissions.
In addition, the GMOC also notes that the State Air Resources Board's (ARB)
deadline of 1998 for requiring 2% of automakers inventory of new vehicles in
California to be "0 emission", has now been pushed back beyond the year 2003.
~'>
14
THRESHOLDS REFLECTING COMPLIANCE
C LIBRARIES -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIBRARY
THRESHOLD BASED ON THE OPENING OF THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA
LIBRARY IN APRIL. 1995. GIVEN GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS.
COMPLIANCE WILL BE MAINTAINED AT LEAST THROUGH THE YEAR 2000.
THE GMOC COMMENDS THE LIBRARY DEPARTMENT FOR ITS DILIGENT
FORWARD PLANNING IN BRINGING ABOUT THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA
LIBRARY.
The Library Threshold Standard requires that 500 square feet of library space
(adequately equipped and staffed) be provided per each 1,000 population. Based
on an estimated City population of 154,350 as of June 30, 1995, a total of 77,175
square feet of library space is required. As of that date, 102,000 square feet was
available through the Chula Vista Public Library at 365 "F" Street with 55,000
square feet, the Eastlake Library at 1120 f;astlake Parkway with 10,000 square feet,
and the new South Chula Vista Library with 37,000 square feet. Based on even the
highest City population projection of 196,680 persons for the year 2000, compliance
will be maintained.
Despite this projected compliance, the GMOC continues to note that most of the
present library facilities are located in western Chula Vista. As discussed in detail
in last year's (1994) report, the next library scheduled for construction is in the
Sweetwater/Bonita General Plan Community, and slated for location at the
northeastern comer of East 'H' Street and Paseo Ranchero, within the Rancho Del
Rey development. At issue for the GMOC last year, was that the timing may be
delayed despite the fact that development and population already exist in eastern
Chula Vista, and substantial growth is on the immediate horizon. The Library's
1994 report indicated that the project will be funded by Development Impact Fees,
and its timing may be delayed beyond the turn of the century, dependant on the
collection of fees to cover the estimated $9.5 million needed to construct, furnish
and equip the facility. This situation, in conjunction with the need to address
longer-term disposition of a permanent library for the Eastern Territories General
Plan Community (which contains the EastLake and Otay Ranch project areas),
raised the GMOC's concern, and prompted a recommendation calling for a much-
needed update of the City's present 1987 Library Master Plan. Based on these
conditions being largely unchanged from last year, the GMOC:
· Continues to stress the need to undertake, In a timely manner, an
update of the City's 1987 Ubrary Master Plan.
In response to that recommendation, the Library's current (1995) report calls for the
update to be conducted in FY1997/98, and funded through Public Facility
Development Impact fees. The stated rationale for this time table is the need to
15
. make a determination as to whether or not to use the 1 acre site that has been
offered at EastLake Village Center for a permanent library no later than June 30,
1998.
~.,
While the proposed preparation date of FY1997-98 has been rationalized in terms
of the present EastLake site option, the GMOC remains concerned since current
land planning re-evaluations for EastLake, and portions of neighboring Otay Ranch,
will likely be completed prior to that time. The GMOC sees a potential problem
should the presently proposed Village Center site be determined inadequate, and
selection of a new site be necessary, since the land planning re-evaluation will not
necessarily be considering an alternate site location. Therefore, regardless of
timing for the formal Library Master Plan Update as proposed by the Library Director
(currently for fiscal year 1997/98), the GMOC:
. Requests that Council direct staff to ensure that interim and
permanent library siting issues are fully considered during the
course of the EastLake Master Plan re-evaluation effort, and the
ongoing Otay Ranch planning efforts. .
Regarding the GMOC's prior recommendation to consider amendments to the
Library Threshold, more time is still needed for technological developments to take
place before considering any potential revisions.
"-.
a DRAINAGE -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
Similar to last year's findings, no major drainage problems or threshold compliance
issues can be attributed to new growth during the review period. City growth
management programs continue to - require major developments to construct
detention basins and other infrastructure so that downstream flows are not
increased. Each new subdivision is required to construct all drainage facilities to
handle storms of a 10 to 100 year magnitude, depending on the facility and size of
the drainage basin. The Environmental Impact Report for each development must
address any possible drainage problems either on-site or off-site. The developer
is then required to implement mitigation measures as necessary. There are a
number of drainage studies, facilities design work, and CIP projects currently
underway, and which are outlined in the detail report in Appendix F.
Last year, in response to the GMOC's expressed concern that quantifiable
data/evidence was not available to demonstrate that new growth in eastern Chula
Vista is not negatively impacting older facilities in western Chula Vista, the Public
Works Department, Engineering Division, responded with a recommendation for
development of a monitoring system to definitively resolve whether such conditions
-"
16
-:'.l
exist, and indicated that such a system was feasible and desirable from a number
of standpoints. Based on the City Council's further direction, the Engineering
Division completed an evaluation of potential sites for such stations in the Poggi
Canyon and Telegraph Canyon drainages in the vicinity of 1-805. The proposal is
to acquire and install one monitoring station in each of the noted drainage basins
as part of the FY 1996-97 CIP budget. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
· That Council approve the additional drainage monitoring stations
proposed in the FY 1996.97 CIP for the Telegraph and Poggi
Canyon drainage courses.
While the GMOC again commends the City for ongoing attentiveness to threshold
maintenance for new development, we remain concerned over needed, but
unfunded drainage improvements throughout western Chula Vista. As noted
previous reports, the City Council accepted an Engineering Department report in
May 1992, which included proposals for construction of drainage facilities to correct
deficiencies, and established a priority list of needed drainage improvement
projects. That list contained a total of 84 needed but currently unfunded
improvements with an approximated cost of $23,025,000. Considering an inflation
rate of 4% per year, funding of $1,695,000 per year for 20 years would be
necessary to complete the projects.
In conjunction with this year's Drainage Threshold report, the Engineering Division
again presented a select list of the current 14 top priority projects, totaling
$3,858,500,. along with their present status and an indication of necessary new
budget appropriations through FY 2000-01 to accomplish them. This list represents
only a portion of the needed, remaining projects from the original 1992 study's list.
The GMOC is acutely aware of funding deficiencies, specifically for those more
significant projects which could present a problem in the case of a major storm.
The GMOC is also aware that current sources of funding for drainage projects are
severely limited in comparison to the total cost of the needed improvements as
indicated above. The $1.6+ million in annualized costs to complete these
improvements over a 20-year period is staggering in light of the many other
demands vying for ever-limited fiscal resources. It is the GMOC's position that if the
City intends to remediate even the most significant of these deficiencies in a
relatively timely manner, and before they present a threshold' problem, concerted
effort and attention need to be given to devising an aggressive funding effort.
Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
· That Council direct appropriate staff to undertake a proactive re-
evaluation of potential funding sources for needed drainage
Improvements In western Chula Vista, and report back to the
Council and the GMOC on prospects and proposed efforts to
obtain them. Several of the Identified priority projects have no
17
:;
funding source, and need to be given attention through an
aggressive effort.
-
a SEWER -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEWER
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
There were no significant instances of the threshold standard for sanitary sewers
being exceeded as a result of new growth during the reporting period. City design
standards for sewers limit the flow in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50% full, and
to 75% full for sewers larger than 12". The City has also allowed flow up to 75%
full in 8",10", and 12" diameter sewers if it can be shown that ultimate development
has already occurred in the area served by that sewer.
The Engineering Division's report outlined several significant activities either recently
completed, or presently underway, to address the provision of adequate sewer
facilities and maintenance of threshold compliance:
1) Pending review and potential update of the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin
DIF based on land use changes within the basin, as well as present out-of-
basin pumped flows.
-
2) Continuing progress toward a Trunk Sewer Usage Agreement with the
County regarding the Proctor Valley Road Sewer which will serve Salt Creek
I, Salt Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch, and the Bonita Meadows
developments, as well as other adjacent parcels.
3) Completion of a sewer replacement and upgrade from an 8 to 12 inch line
in the Palm Canyon area.
4) FY 1995-96 CIP inclusion for a major reconstruction of sewers under Bonita
Rd. between 1-805 and Plaza Bonita Rd.
5) The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor problem sites in
order to determine if the condition of the sewer lines has affected the flow.
An additional 54,320 linear feet of sewer lines were televised during 1995 for
Phase VII of the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. Crews will be concentrating
their efforts on the Montgomery area during 1996.
6) A developer-funded study of the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin to determine
needed improvements and related funding mechanisms, is planned and work
should commense during FY 1995-96.
-
18
San Dieao MetroDolitan Seweraae System
At present, the City's total daily wastewater flow into the Metropolitan Sewage
System (Metro) is approximately 11.198 million gallons per day (mgd), which is
down slightly from last year (12.048 mgd), but still well within our current contract
capacity of 19.2 mgd. The 11.198 mgd includes 9.267 mgd of metered flows
discharged directly to the Metro sewer line, and 1.931 mgd of metered and non-
metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley Outfall Sewer. Annual
wastewater flows continue to change at a rate much less than predicted due
primarily to the recent building slowdown and water conservation efforts, and are
now more accurately tracked by new metering stations.
As required by the Threshold Standard, staff indicates that there is adequate
capacity in the Metro system to serve growth for the coming 12 to 18 months based
on the City's growth forecasts. With regard to longer-term growth projections, our
remaining contract capacity of 8.002 mgd should serve the City until approximately
2010 or later, depending on the rate of growth. Although the City's 1960 Metro
agreement expires in 2004, the agreement allows the City, at its option, to extend
the contract to 2014.
It is with regard to this longer-term situation that the GMOC continues to express
concern. As was initially presented last year, the prior Metro management system,
under which we have our present contracts, was replaced by the San Diego Area
Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD). The SDAWMD was intended to
manage construction and operation of Metro and Clean Water Program sewage
transportation and treatment facilities. Chula Vista exercised its option to withdraw
from the SDAWMD without penalty in June, 1994. Since then, the City of San
Diego has also withdrawn, along with other cities, and the SDAWMD has been
dissolved. At present, all Metro and Clean Water Program facilities will be owned
and operated by the City of San Diego. Current efforts on the part of the City and
other South Bay jurisdictions are focusing on various options for financing, design,
construction and operation of a treatmentlwater reclamation plant in the Otay Valley,
which has been indefinitely postponed by the City of San Diego, but no decisions
have been made yet. The City is also negotiating with San Diego regarding our
Metro contract to determine the City's responsibility to participate in the funding of
wastewater transportation, treatment, and water reclamation facilities other than the
original Point Loma plant.
The GMOC sees the results of these discussions as critical to resolving the
uncertainty which presently exists regarding the availability and costs for future
sewerage treatment capacity sufficient to.meet buildout needs of the City's adopted
General Plan. The GMOC therefore recommends:
· That . Council continue to support staff and consultive efforts to
expeditiously develop a strategic plan which ensures sufficient
future sewage treatment capacity to meet the long-range,
bulldout needs of the City's adopted General Plan.
19
~~_.
=--.
The GMOC further requests that the available results of this
strategic planning effort be presented to the GMOC during the
next threshold review cycle commencing in October, 1996.
AlII!IIo."
In addition, the discussions form another critical link with respect to the future
availability and usage of reclaimed water. The North City Plant, the South Bay
Treatment Plan adjacent to the International Boundary and Water Commissions
(IBWC) Plant in the Tijuana River Valley, and the proposed Otay Valley Plant will
provide the majority of reclaimed water which could be used locally in Chula Vista.
In this regard, the success of discussions and negotiations regarding the financing
and construction of proposed Clean Water Program facilities will largely determine
whether reclaimed water usage on a meaningful scale will ever become a reality.
As discussed further in the following section, development of significant reclaimed
water resources is key to attaining local water district's goals to reduce dependance
on imported water supply.
a WATER-
THE GMOC FINDS THAT BOTH THE SWEETWATER AUTHORITY AND OTAY
WATER DISTRICT HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLY AND AVAILABILITY TO
MEET THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GROWTH OVER THE NEXT 12 TO 18 MONTHS.
AND ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE WATER THRESHOLD STANDARD.
-
Both water districts reported that the overall outlook for water supply at the State,
County and local (Chula Vista) for the next 12 to 18 months is excellent. The future
picture is also becoming very positive, and capable of supporting the City's long-
term growth plans, including Otay Ranch.
The GMOC again commends both water districts for their continuing cooperative
efforts together, with other water districts, and with the City regarding the supply
and delivery of water to meet the needs of existing and future development. Both
Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority have been quite responsive in
addressing prior GMOC concerns regarding longer-term supply and storage issues.
Based on the continued cooperation and progress toward ensuring sufficient long-
term supply, as outlined below, the GMOC is again not recommending issuance of
a "Statement of Concern" to either district.
Following are examples of the substantial progress made in the area of long-term
supply at the State, County and local level since the GMOC last issued a
"Statement of Concern" to the districts in our 1993 report:
The Metropolitan Water District (MWD) has implemented a water policy to
assure long-term supply. MWD's goal is to meet 100% ofthe water demand
90% of the time, and the remaining 10% of the time meet a minimum of 80%
of the water demand. To achieve this goal, MWD is investing in recharge
projects, desalinization, and funding of recycled water and other new wat~r
sources.
r
I
20
MWO has commenced construction of Domenigoni Reservoir in Riverside
County which is scheduled for completion in the year 2000, and will store
excess water in times of plentiful supply to be used in the San Diego Region
in drought or other emergencies, such as earthquakes. .
MWO has adopted an integrated resources plan which includes six
implementation policies covering the following topics; reliability, balance,
competitiveness, completion of the Eastside (Domenigoni) Reservoir,
Colorado River Aqueduct operation capacity, and adaptability.
The San Diego County Water Authority (CWA) and local water districts are
working to develop a region-wide "Highly Reliable Water Supply Rate" for
industry. This proposal has been merged with the City of San Diego's
SWAP program (San Diego Water Availability Plan), which proposes to
collect slightly higher rates to fund water transfers.
The CWA and local districts continue to discuss the potential exchange of
water between agencies and the 'wheeling" of water by CWA.
The CWA is also studying the feasibility of bringing excess Imperial Irrigation
District water to San Diego.
The CWA's Pipeline No.4 is expected to be in operation by February 1997,
and will substantially increase the capacity of the treated water delivery
system to Otay Water District (OWO).
OWD is developing an Integrated Resource Plan to assure the reliability of
water supply through a multi-faceted approach involving development of
wells, recharge, desalinization, local treatment plants, local storage, recycled
water and conservation.
OWO has completed preparation of a Draft Water Resources Master Plan
which incorporates the concepts of water storage and supply from
neighboring water agencies to meet operational and emergency supply.
OWO has been working closely with City staff in developing the plan,
particularly in the context of the City's Sphere of Influence Update effort and
provision of water to the Otay Ranch project.
The Sweetwater Authority (SWA) has prepared a preliminary design and an
Environmental Impact Report for a plant to extract brackish groundwater in
the Lower Sweetwater River area.
The SWA is proceeding with design. and environmental compliance to
increase the storage capacity of Sweetwater Reservoir by approximately
2000 acre-feet.
The SWA is in discussion with the County of San Diego regarding the
County's proposed construction of an 8 to 10 MGD reclaimed water
21
treatment plant on the Spring Valley trunk sewer near the South Bay -
Swapmeet. SWA would plan to use the reclaimed water in the seawater
barrier along 1-5 to protect future Phase II of the Lower Sweetwater River
Demineralization Facility from saltwater intrusion.
These and a number of other efforts on the part of both districts are contained in
the reports in Appendix G. .
From among the number of regional and local water planning activities presently
taking place, the GMOC would like to highlight the matter of reclaimed water since
it is stated to playa reasonably significant role in meeting long-term needs, and in
reducing dependance on imported supply. As introduced in the preceding Sewer
section of this report, reclaimed water is taking an increasing role in meeting
regional sewage treatment mandates, as well as in meeting the water demands of
future growth. Given this increasing role in both arenas, the GMOC believes that
there is a need to focus attention on the topic to ensure public awareness and
involvement about its usage. Such awareness and involvement will assist in
building a market for reclaimed water, the economics of which will have a direct and
fundamental bearing on whether significant future use of reclaimed water becomes
a reality of not.
Towards ensuring that reclaimed water takes on a meaningful role in the South Bay
and Chula Vista, the GMOC requests:
. That focus be given to the to the topic of future availability and
useage of reclaimed water, and that both local water districts
Include discussion of the present efforts and status of reclaimed
water development In next year's reports to the GMOC.
Since most of the region's future reclaimed water will be generated from sewage
treatment plants, the location and timing of reclaimed water transmission
infrastructure, and establishment of a consumer market needs to be coordinated
with long-range sewage treatment proposals.
On the local front, both water districts continue to actively participate on the
Interagency Water Task Force (IAWTF) which has proven to be an excell~nt forum
for the City and the districts to develop strategies for immediate and long range
water delivery to the South Bay area, including state-wide water matters which may
impact development within Chula Vista. As the City moves forward with sphere of
influence implementation and development of the Otay Ranch and other large
projects, this type of ongoing coordination will continue to be invaluable, and
therefore, the GMOC recommends:
.
That the City Council continue to support the City's Involvement
with the IA WTF, and direct staff to work cooperatively with both
local water agencies and the CWA to further the mutual goals of
reducing dependence on Imported water supply, and developing
-
22
.-"
a sufficient storage and supply network to meet the demands of
future growth.
In each of the last two annual reports, the GMOC has presented Sweetwater
Authority's request for increased coordination regarding the consideration of water
transmission line capacity to support rezonings and infill development, particularly
in the northwestern quadrant of the City. While the Sweetwater Authority notes
improved communication between project proponents and the City, their current
report continues to indicate that multi-unit housing's fire flow demands continue to
exceed the capacity of existing, small diameter cast iron pipes. The GMOC would
therefore recommend:
· That the City Council direct staff of the Public Works, Planning,
Building and Housing, and Fire Departments to confirm that a
coordinated process does, or will, exist to accomplish advance
notification to project applicants regarding water system
adequacy to meet the fire flow demands for infill development in
western Chula Vista.
In order to further address this issue, perhaps it would be prudent for City staff to
undertake an effort with Sweetwater Authority to comprehensively evaluate infill
development potential in western Chula Vista, as a means to identify necessary
water supply infrastructure improvements. This would essentially amount to a
Western Chula Vista Water Improvement Master Plan, which developers and the
City alike would be aware of well in advance of need.
23
i /
f
I
~'^
a PARKS AND RECREATION -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE PRESENT STANDARD. THAT THE CITY IS
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARKS AND 'RECREATION THRESHOLD ON BOTH
A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS
The Parks and Recreation threshold is a population-based standard calling for 3.0
acres of neighborhood and community park land to be provided for every 1,000
residents east of 1-805. This standard has been met as of June 30, 1995, as
illustrated by the following table:
Acres of Acres/ Acre Shortfall
Area PODulation Parks 1.000 or Excess
East of 1-805 44;161 203.40 4.61 +70.92
West of 1-805 110,228 129.45 1.17 -201.23
City-Wide 154,389 332.85 2.16 -130.32
Standard/Ideal 154,389 463.17 3.00 -130.32
-
While demonstrating compliance (based on the present standard applying east of
1-805 only), this table also reflects the continuing shortfall in park land both for
western Chula Vista, and for the City as a whole. The matter of City-wide and
western Chula Vista conditions under the spirit of the Threshold Standard for
eastern Chula Vista, has been an issue with the GMOC since 1990.
At that time, the GMOC first recommended that the Parks and Recreation Threshold
be revised to apply City-wide. The thrust was to exemplify that growth management
policy, and the related "quality-of-Iife" goals, were city-wide concepts, and not
intended to create perceptions of "haves" and "have-nots" with regard to new and
existing development areas respectively. Concerns initially expressed at that time
dealt with the fact that the Thresholds were intended to ensure a standard for ~
arowth. Since the vast majority of new growth was to occur e"ast of the I-80S, the
standard was established to apply there. A secondary concern was that the older,
western area of the City had developed since 1911, without the guidance of such
a standard. When coupled with the Montgomery annexation area, western Chula
Vista was understood to have a substantial pre-existing deficiency, making
application of the new growth standard there questionable, particularly any standard
which required growth moratoriums for non-compliance.
In 1992, the City Council endorsed the concept of such an amended, city-wide
standard, but called for a study of a potential credit system (parks equivalency
factor), and/or other innovative approaches, which could be employed toward
addressing the pre-existing deficient conditions in western Chula Vista. The Council
-
24
indicated that it desired completion of this study, before it would consider adoption
of a revised, city-wide standard. It was agreed at that time, that any application of
a 3 acres/1000 population parks standard in western Chula Vista would be a long-
term (20+ years) goal, and not a rigid requirement whose non-compliance would
result in a growth moratorium, as is the case under the present eastern Chula Vista
Standard.
This study, under the title of the Western Chula Vista Parks Implementation Plan
(PIP), was initiated by staff in 1993, but has yet to be completed and adopted. The
GMOC is frustrated that adoption of the revised Threshold policy has been delayed
contingent upon completion of the PIP. The GMOC believes the PIP should be
completed expeditiously so that a revised threshold standard can be adopted.
Toward accomplishing this, the GMOC again recommends:
· That the City Council direct that the PIP be completed and
available when the GMOC commences its next review cycle in
October, 1996.
The GMOC finds that this action is necessary in view of the number of issues
whose resolution is contingent upon completion of the PIP. Such issues include
private parks credit, potential open space and Greenbelt credits, and active
recreation facility equivalency factors to name a few. In addition, the majority of the
GMOC's recommendations regarding parks, as originally presented in our 1993
report, are still outstanding and contingent upon completion of the PIP.
With regard to a revised City-wide Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard, the
GMOC has been presented with an amended draft which is included as Appendix
I. This draft represents a revision from that originally presented to Council in 1992,
and is intended to address concerns regarding pre-existing deficiencies and
moratorium provisions within western Chula Vista. In summary, the revision
establishes a 3 acre/1000 population city-wide standard, and divides compliance
requirements for eastern and western Chula Vista, such that existing provisions for
the east remain as is, but in the west, the "standard" is made a 20+ year goal for
which annual compliance is based upon reported progress toward reaching that
goal in accordance with provisions and schedules contained in a master plan (the
PIP). Should the GMOC find that implementation progress is not occurring in a
timely fashion, then it shall report such to Council along with any related
recommendations. Since progress is toward a "goal", there would be no rigid
penalty clause, other than the City being held to implementing its adopted, long-
term Parks Master Plan. In order, however, for such a standard to be feasible, it
cannot be adopted absent the Parks Master Plan to which it is linked. Therefore,
the GMOC recommends:
· That the City Council direct appropriate staff to finalize the
revised, draft Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard
alrendment presented in Appendix I, and return It for formal
public hearing adoption with the PIP no later than October, 1996.
25
D
SCHOOLS -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
AND SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTS' RESPONSES TO THE
CITY'S 12-18 MONTH GROWTH FORECAST. THAT SUFFICIENT CAPACITY
EXISTS TO ACCOMMODATE PROJECTED NEW STUDENTS. AND
THEREFORE. THE SCHOOLS THRESHOLD STANDARD IS BEING MET.
Both districts again reported that sufficient capacity exists to accommodate student
enrollment as forecast from City development projections for the period of July 1,
1995 to December 31, 1996. This condition is due in part to the reduced volume
of development resulting from continued recession, but also from the fact that much
of the growth will occur in eastern Chula Vista where sufficient new facilities are
being provided through Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFD's). This is
not to say that capacity issues do not exist in schools, particularly west of the 1-805
where the majority are operating above capacity, and where students are being
accommodated through a combination of relocatable classrooms, classroom
reconfiguration, busing, and multi-track year-round (Mueller) school.
Following are highlights of currently relevant school planning activities and/or issues
as presented and discussed by the GMOC specific to each district.
a.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Based upon the City's 12 to 18 month growth forecast, the Chula Vista
Elementary School District (CVESD) has estimated that it will need to
accommodate 16 new students west of I-80S, given the 52 residential units
forecast for completion there from July, 1995 through December, 1996.
Currently, most of the schools west of 1-805 are at or over permanent
capacity, although some capacity does exist in certain schools at various
grade levels. As of January 5,'1996, a total of 385 children throughout the
District were being bused to relieve this situation. This is down from 584
children previously reported for April, 1995. The District, however, has
indicated that it can accommodate the projected new students within existing
facilities through a combination of the techniques previously noted.
As has been stated in previous reports, only limited opportunities exist for
adding capacity and physically expanding existing schools in the area west
of 1-805. Vista Square and Rice Elementary Schools could potentially be
expanded, and a 4-acre vacant land site.adjacent to Feaster School could
be acquired. On December 12, 1995, the Board of Education authorized
school staff to enter into formal discussions with that property owner. In all
these instances, however, lack of funding continues to be an obstacle to
progress.
On the matter of longer-range school capacity planning and related impact
mitigation programs, the joint Source Point School Enrollment Impact Study
26
--
~,
-
-
:)('>
involving the City and both school districts has been completed. The Study
analizes both residential and non-residential growth, and projects related
student enrollment growth for each school attendance area (including primary
and secondary facilities) through the year 2010. Based on the Study's
conclusions, it is now necessary for the City and the districts to meet and
discuss the development of. equitable strategies to ensure sufficient
mitigation of those impacts. Regarding this effort, it is important to note that
the Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) has indicated that it will
not be participating. The reason for this is that SUHSD believes that
formation of such a subcommittee may lead to policy decisions which cannot
be attained in the four remaining local governmental jurisdictions
encompassed by their district. It is of the. utmost importance to the SUHSD
that it be consistent in its aplication of developer fee programs and the
administration of Mello-Roos Community Facility District programs.
Regardless, the Study remains valuable to the City and the CVESD, and
therefore the GMOC recommends:
· That the City Council and the CVESD Board form a
subcommittee to evaluate the SourcePoint study's
findings, and to consider development of appropriate
mitigation strategies.
That consideration should include evaluation of multi-track
scheduling which is considered to be one possible form of
mitigation where projected enrollment Increases do not
warrant significant new, or expanded facilities.
With regard to proposed development of the City's bayfront, both the CVESD
and the SUHSP continue to indicate that the project does not have an
established full mitigation prc;>gram for school impacts, and stress the need,
through future approvals, for the City to require such mitigation to the
satisfaction of the districts. Therefore, the GMOC:
· Continues to stress that any major development, both
residential and non-residential, on the City's bayfront be
appropriately conditioned to require lull mitigation of its
school impacts.
East of 1-805, the CVESD estimates it will need to accommodate
approximately 465 new students, given the 1549 new residential units
forecast for completion in the area from July, 1995 through December, 1996.
Approximately 96% of these housing units are in the Eastlake, Rancho Del
Rey, Telegraph Canyon Estates, and East Palomar Estates, all of which are
within Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFD) and therefore
mitigated. Clear View is the home school for the remaining 4.4% (20
students) who can be accommodated there.
27
L./ )
The EastLake Community now has two elementary schools, Eastlake and -
Olympicview, which also serve the Salt Creek I project. Discovery School
serves the majority of Rancho del Rey, with three neighborhoods scheduled
to attend Clear View. Children from Telegraph Canyon Estates attend
Tiffany School, and those from East Palomar Estates will attend Palomar
School. The CVESD continues ~o work with developers to establish
additional CFD's, or other forms of full mitigation to address schools
provision for the Salt Creek Ranch, Otay Ranch and Rancho San Miguel
projects. Other smaller projects continue to be annexed to generic CFD No.
5.
b. Sweetwater Union Hiah School District
The Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) reported an enrollment
of 29,596 students throughout the district, a 651 student (2.2%) increase
over the 1994-95 school year. Of these students, 15,502, or 52% of the
total, attend the five high schools, three middle schools and one junior high
school in Chula Vista. By comparison, enrollment in secondary schools in
Chula Vista grew by 502 students over 1994-95 levels. Most of that growth
occurred at Bonita Vista High, Bonita Vista Middle School and Hilltop High
School. Eastlake High experienced a 14% increase, however, that school
is only at 65% of capacity, and can accommodate approximately another 850
students. With the exception of Eastlake High, all high schools are operating
above capacity. Bonita Vista Middle School is over capacity. All other
middle/junior high schools are either at or below capacity.
...........
Given the 12-18 month forecast provided by the Chula Vista Planning
Department, the SUHSD projects an increase of 444 students in Chula Vista
middle, junior high and high schools for the period of July 1, 1995 through
December 31, 1996. Of this enrollment growth, 96% will be absorbed at
Bonita Vista Middle, Bonita Vista High and Eastlake High Schools. Bonita
Vista Middle and Bonita Vista High will be the "resident schools" for 64%
(284 students) of that enrollment growth. Bonita Vista High and Middle
Schools will have difficulty accepting these new "resident" students without
the addition of classroom space. EastLake High School has capacity to
reduce overcrowding at Bonita Vista High. The District anticipates opening
a new middle school in the Rancho del Rey project in the Fall of 1998. The
addition of this new middle school will relieve overcrowding at Bonita Vista
Middle School. In addition, as Eastlake and Rancho Del Rey build out,
attendance area adjustments for Bonita Vista and Eastlake High Schools are
expected to balance enrollment increases, and alleviate overcrowding at
Bonita Vista High.
The GMOC would like to point out that some of the present overcrowding at
Bonita Vista High School results from the District's approach on optional
attendance areas. Eastlake High School's optional areas A (Sunnyside), B
(Bonita Highlands) and C (Bonita Long Canyon) have approximately 425
-
28
students attending Bonita Vista High School. Had it not been for the optional
area designations, these students would attend Eastlake High School.
Bonita Vista High is presently overcrowded by about 400 students; -Eastlake
High is under capacity by 856 students. With this in mind, the GMOC
recommends: .
· That the City Council take this Issue under advisement,
and determine whether it desires to approach the SUHSD
Board to reevaluate its approach regarding the present
optional attendance areas for Bonita Vista and East/ake
High Schools.
The SUHSO continues to work with other major development projects to
establish Mello-Roos CFO's or other forms of full mitigation. Projects for
which negotiations have not yet been completed are San Miguel Ranch and
Salt Creek Ranch. The Baldwin Company has recently commenced Mello-
Roos CFO formation proceedings for the Otay Ranch project. The SUHSO
continues to draw attention to Salt Creek Ranch and Otay Ranch in terms of
school timing. As planned, in addition to students from EastLake, students
from the nearly completed Salt Creek I project are to attend Eastlake High
School, as are students from Salt Creek Ranch. The schools in Otay Ranch
are to be constructed large enough to accommodate the equivalent number
of students which will come from Salt Creek Ranch. This is in anticipation
that when a high school opens in Otay Ranch, attendance area boundaries
for Eastlake High would be adjusted.
In its current report, the SUHSO indicates that based on the City's
development projections, and related student generation and absorbtion, it
will be necessary for a new high school to be open in approximately seven
years. This would require the site to be rough graded, and with utilities
available, in approximately five years (about the year 2000). Based on the
number of dwelling units proposed in Otay Ranch SPA One, it will be
necessary for a high school to open commensurate with that development.
In the presently approved Otay Ranch GOP, however, the intended high
school sites are in Villages 7 and 11, not in the SPA One (Villages 1 and 5)
area which will be the first increment of development. Therefore, the GMOC
recommends:
· That the City Council ensure through conditions of
approval on Otay Ranch SPA One, that delivery of the first
high school be accelerated to a site within or adjacent to
SPA One, and which will be developed commensurate with
construction In SPA One In accordance with requirements
In the project's Public Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP). This
would Include processing any necessary amendments to
the City's General Plan and/or Otay Ranch General
Development Plan to facilitate that siting.
29
Such a schedule is necessary to avoid potential overcrowding at Eastlake
High, and further overcrowding at Bonita Vista High.
-
Due to the above stated relationship of the Salt Creek Ranch project to
middle and high school facility timing considerations, the SUHSD also
indicated the ever-pressing need to resolve schools mitigation requirements
for that project, which has already received Tentative Map Approval. In July,
1993, Community Facilities District (CFD) proceedings were formally
abandoned by the Baldwin Company, and more recently the project has
been acquired by the JM Development Co. Negotiations have yet to be
resumed with the District. It takes some time to form a new CFD, and to
generate adequate revenue to finance construction of a needed schools. If
mitigation is to be in the form of a CFD, it is essential that formation occur
well in advance of development (approx. 2-3 years) to assure facilities will
be available when children begin to arrive. At the behest of both school
districts, the GMOC therefore recommends:
.
That the City encourage the new developer of the Salt
Creek Ranch project (JM Development Co.) to promptly
commence mitigation negotiations with both school
districts, and to provide evidence of such commencement
to the City prior to the City's accepting for processing any
Final Subdivision Maps for the project. This is especially
relevant for the SUHSD, since the project does not include
any middle or high school facilities.
-
One final issue raised by the SUHSD, regards the co-siting of school and
parks sites in new development, and the related consideration of potential
joint use agreements for the sharing of facilities. They specifically indicated
in their report that they encourage the City to develop a joint use agreement
for the new mi~dle school and adjacent Voyager Park prior to the opening
of either facility. As the GMOC understands, the City has several such
agreements with both school districts regarding the usage of various City and
district facilities, which have produced greater assets for the entire
community. The GMOC wholly supports the concept of such agreements,
which can be of great benefit to all parties. This is particularly true of the
present and future, where ever-diminishing resources more otten demand the
creative solutions only brought about by partnerships. With this intent in
mind, the GMOC recommends:
.
That a standing subcommittee of select members of the
City Council and both school district Boards be created to
work with appropriate staff to develop a plan/strategy
regarding school facility joint usage endeavors for both
the shared use of existing grounds and facilities, as well
as for the co-siting and shared financing and development
of new facilities.
-
30
" .I I
1;..-r
As a closing note, the GMOC would also like to draw attention to the
relationship of such joint use agreements in addressing the expansion of
available parks and recreation facilities in western Chula Vista. As the
GMOC understands, the PIP will likely rely on promotion of joint use
agreements as a means of dealing with the land availability and cost
constraints to adding significant new parkland in western Chula Vista.
a TRAFFIC -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRAFFIC
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS. AS
EVIDENCED BY THE FINDINGS OF THE 1995 TRAFFIC MONITORING
PROGRAM CTMPl REPORT.
The threshold for traffic requires that Level-of-Service (LOS) "C" or better as
measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments,
except that during peak hours, LOS of "0" can occur for no more than any two
hours of the day. Those signalized intersections west of 1-805 which did not meet
the above standard when it was established in 1991, may continue to operate at
their 1991 LOS levels, but shall not worsen. The traffic threshold utilizes the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method which analyzes conditions over whole
roadway segments, and is intended as a more comprehensive measurement since
it considers the overall "driving experience" in terms of time delay.
1995 Traffic Monitorina Proaram
The 1995 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) summarizes the results of
analysis performed on all arterial street segments from the last three TMP
reports (1992, '93 and '94) which were found to operate at LOS C or less in
at least one direction for each of the affected time periods (AM, Mid-day,
PM). Additional studies were also performed on H St. from 1-5 to 1-805, and
on East H St. from 1-805 to Rutgers Ave. The 1995 TMP's travel time
surveys were conducted from March to mid-September, 1995.
The 1995 TMP's results indicate that all arterial segments studied during
each time period operate at LOS C or better, except for the following which
operate at LOS 0 for a portion of one or more of each of the affected two
hour periods (AM, Mid-day, PM):
Third Ave. (C St. - H St.)
Otay Lakes (E. H St. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.)
- SB
- NB & SB
Of all segments studied, only the above noted northbound segment of Qtay
Lakes Rd. operated at LOS 0 for more than two hourS, and thereby would
not meet the Traffic Threshold Standard for a Class I arterial. All other
segments found to operate at LOS 0 did so for less than two hours in any
of the affected periods, and are thereby in compliance with the Standard.
31
! 1;-
:...-i' ....
With regard to the noted Otay Lakes Rd. segments, staff indicates that a
Class I arterial is an inappropriate designation. Class I arterials have free
flow traffic speeds of 35 to 45 mph, the number of signals per mile are less
than four, and there is no parking and generally no access to abutting
property. As outlined in detail in the Engineering Division's report, these
characteristics are not representative .of the noted segment, and it should be
designated as a Class II arterial. With this change, the segment would
function within the Threshold Standards.
With regard to other segments studied, the following were found to be
operating in the lower 1/3 of the LOS C travel speed standards, meaning
they could be approaching LOS 0, and should be watched closely in the
future:
Third Ave.
E. H St.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
(C St. - H St.)
(SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
(E. H St. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.) .
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- SB
- EB & we
- NB & 5B
- EB & we
In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1995 TMP also reevaluated
those arterial interchanae segments found by the 1994 TMP to be operating
at LOC C or less during each affected time period. Although such
interchange segments are not subject to the Threshold Standard, their
evaluation is a growth management consideration in situations where
proposed developments have a significant impact at interchanges, which
indirectly, can affect adjoining arterial segments covered under the
Standards. The results indicate that all arterial interchange segments
operate at LOS C, except for the following which operate at LOS 0:
AM Period
Palomar St. (Bay BI. - lndustrial BI.) - EB
Mid-dav Period
H St. (Bay BI. - Woodlawn Ave.) - EB & we .
PM Period
ESt. (Bay BI. - Woodlawn Ave.) -WB
H St. (Bay BI. - Woodlawn Ave.) -WB
Palomar St. (Bay BI. - Industrial) - EB
With regard to arterial interchange segments with freeways, particularly at 1-5
as reflected above, the 1995 TMP continues to reflect marginal levels-of-
seNice performance. This is due primarily to the close spacing of the
signals, signal timing at the freeway ramps which is controlled by
CAL TRANS, and the high volume of vehicles entering and exiting the
32
-
.........<
..........,
.d,
:"-!i::J
freeway. This is especially true of the short segment of westbound "H"
Street between Woodlawn Ave. and Bay Blvd. A related concern remains
with the trolley crossing gates at "E", "H" and Palomar Streets which interrupt
flows every 5 to 7.5 minutes. The GMOC reiterates the need to continue to
urge the Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) to eventually
construct grade separations or other solutions to improve long-term traffic
flow.
The 1995 TMP's evaluation of H Street both east and west of 1-805 found
that all segments are presently operating at acceptable Levels of Service.
The GMOC continues, however, to be cautious based on a statement in the
1995 TMP regarding H Street which reads "Staff will continue to monitor this
traffic corridor and, when necessaryj will recommend any operational
changes that may be appropriate to maintain the hiahest Level of Service
Dossible." The latter portion of that statement appears to imply that H Street
may not meet adopted LOS standards in the future.
This is precisely the question which initially raised GMOC concerns over H
Street; whether already approved, but not-yet-built development will overtax
the street? While the GMOC wants to emphasize the significant
improvement in the monitoring and reporting ot both short- and long-term
traffic conditions, we still, however, believe that potential problems may arise
in the future. At the present time, that concern stems from the fact that 2
major hospital approvals (Kaiser and Scripps) have yet to be built, as well as
the buildout of the Rancho del Rey Comm~rcial Center, including a possible
movie theater which is an additional traffic generator. In addition, there is
the buildout of adjoining, substantial residential developments in SPAs II and
III of Rancho del Rey. All these projects will affect the H Street corridor and
add additional traffic, despite the fact that significant volumes already exist
on the street today, and that it is essentially built to its ultimate configuration
given that deveJopment flanks up to either side of its right-ot-way. It is with
this in mind that the GMOC: -
· Requests that the City Council direct the Engineering
Division to continue to include 5 to 7 year performance
projections for major arterial streets, such as H Street, as
part of its annual reporting to the GMOC.
In this way, the GMOC will be afforded reasonable foresight as to potential
traffic issues before they become a problem, and can apprise the Council
accordingly in our annual report.
The GMOC also continues to be aware.ofthe long-range need for SR125 in
the context maintaining threshold compliance on the arterial street system.
Simlar to our 1994 report, the GMOC continue~ to recommend:
· That the City Council actively support plans for
development of the full SR125 freeway or tollway facility.f
33
L!'7
- Notwithstanding the traffic issues presented in this section, the GMOC again -
. commends the Engineering Division for a thorough monitoring program and an
informative report.
a FISCAL -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FISCAL
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
NEW GROWTH CONTINUES TO PRODUCED SUFFICIENT REVENUES
THROUGH THE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (DIF) SYSTEMS TO
FUND CURRENT. RELATED FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
The Fiscal threshold standard addresses the impacts of growth on the City's fiscal
well being, particularly the collection and expenditure of impact fees from new
development. The Fiscal threshold calls for the preparation of a report to the
GMOC which evaluates the fiscal impacts of growth on operations' and capital
improvements over both the previous 12 months, and the coming 12-18 month
period, including an analysis of development impact fee collection and expenditure
over the previous 12-month period.
The Finance Department's report was presented in two major parts; one addressing
the overall fiscal status of the City with regard to the ability to maintain operations
and services, and the other providing an overview of the status of each of the City's
DIF programs including recent project expenditures. The following highlights major
points in each of the two parts, which are described in greater detail in Appendix L.
-.
Develooment Imoact Fee Proarams
The GMOC finds that evaluation of facility needs. and related phasing and
financial planning for major developments and other activities, have become
an integral part of the day-to-day development review process. The Public
Facility Finance Plans (PFFP) required of major new developments
effectively ensure that financial aspects are addressed. The subsequent
special assessments and financing techniques employed for major new
developments are designed to generate sufficient revenue to fund current
projects and services. In addition. an annual DIF funds financial. report is
prepared by the Finance and Public Works Departments to review the
funding status of each DIF and its projects. and to update the associated
costs for these and any new facilities necessary to support future
development. The reports analyze the apportionment of costs to projected
development in order to adjust the DIF's to be applied to new development.
In accordance with the current annual DIF reports, the Finance Director
indicated that the various DIF's (Transportation, Traffic Signal, Parks,
Drainage, Sewers and Public Facilities), as well as related CIP planning
efforts, are generally working as planned, and appear in good fiscal health.
This takes into consideration that some of the DIF's (being 15-20+ year
facility plans) are ,still in their relative infancy, and that some facilities, such
-
34
H
as major roadways, have been advance constructed by developers who then
receive credit against DIF payments at the time of building permit issuance.
With respect to long-range DIF planning and update, last year the GMOC
recommended that the annual update process for the Public Facilities DIF be
expanded to include a five-year projection of needs based on the City's 5-7
year growth forecasts called for under the Growth Management Program
(GMP). The intent was to provide consistency in the growth assumptions
used among the various DIFs, and in the identification of issues before they
become a problem. Five year projections are already effectively incorporated
in the other DIFs, either directly or through the City's Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) budget process. The Finance Director's report expressed
agreement on this issue, and indicated that an update of the Public Facilities
DIF to add the Otay Ranch project was forthcoming, and should occur in
FY1995/96 or 1996/97. That update affords an opportunity to include
program scheduling that projects future needs and revenues for the next five
years. .
Dialog with the Finance Director also indicated, however, that for various
reasons, some of the DIFs have not been updated for several years. Given
the fundamental role of the DIF's in maintaining compliance with the Fiscal
Threshold, the GMOC finds it necessary, and desirable, to adhere to a
standard schedule for update of the DIF's and other fee systems, in order to
ensure that the impacts of development have been accurately assessed, and
that an adequate fee is being levied to fund needed improvements. The
GMOC therefore recommends:
· That the City Council ensure that adequate staffing and
resources are provided to conduct review and necessary
update of the DIF's every one to two years, to ensure the
a~curacy of projections, facility costs and other
assumptions.. This should include a requirement for the
inclusion of standard, five-year growth projections in each
of the DIF updates.
Citv-wide Fiscal Overview
Overall, the City is showing signs of recovery from the recession. Two major
recession-related revenue catagories, sales tax and property tax, registered
moderate increases for FY1994-95. While overall revenues increased by
$1,627,857 (3.4%), included in that amount was a one-time refund of
$1,878,000 from the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS).
Excluding this PERS refund, revenues decreased by $250,142. On the other
side of the ledger, total expenditures decreased by $1,810,332 (3.2%) when
compared to FY1993/94, due mainly to freezing or eliminating vacant staff
positions, and cutting back on supplies and services.
35
In general, the City has lost approximately $3.5 million per year over the last several
years due to various state budget actions, and the lingering recession. Given
present uncertainties regarding State revenues, and the slow pace of economic
recovery, the GMOC remains concerned about the future fiscal conditions for the
City relative to maintaining service levels." Many cities in the region have already
been faced with wholesale cuts and the related deterioration of services. Under
such a scenario, the GMOC envisions potential impacts to threshold standards as
staffingand/or services could be cut, and feels it prudent to make our concern
known, even though this situation derives from non-growth related fiscal issues.
-
(GMOC-95\FIN-ANUL,RPT)
-.
36
o
0)-
:io::
C)<C
:i
Z:i
0::;)
Uitl)
~tI)
:iZ
:iQ
01-
00
I-<C
:t:C)
C)z
Uii=
o::z
ww
>:i
Ow
I-..J
zo.
w:i
:i-
wtl)
C)z
<Co
z-
<c1-
:i<C
c
:t:Z
~~
O:i
0::0
C)O
lOW
a) 0::
a)
-
... C).
z..
i=
Z
w
:i
UJ
..J
0.
:i
....
o
..~.th
0%
0.0
oi=
0::0
e:<c
tI)
w
tI)
Z
o
0.
tI)
w
0::
u.
u.
<c
I-
tI)
"0
Q)
.et) _
~ ~ O)T""
~ Q) .5 <'Ii
0).0"0 E
.5 c: 5 Q)
~~LL~
o 0
~~ '-
I/)-~I/)
'- CU U Q)
"0 .e '-
c:~r--.Q.
CUI/)~~
:2:2~0
.0.00)1/)
cuQ)T""n;
"0 :5 it .!!l
Q) ~Q).e
.~ ..-.e I-
Q):O--
CJ 0 _ .
~Eo~
I/) >>1::~
CU_CUQ)
.e .!! 0. L..
e .~ ~ Q)
Q) 0. .0
EO=O
_L..CJ_
L.. 0. c:
CU 0. :;, "0
o.cuOQ)
Q)oUQ)
0_ c:
Q)-
~5:5E
="0>,1/)
o C:.Q I/)
a.. Q) c:
> c: 0
Q) 8.. ;
.eQ) 0.
1-:5:;,0
T""
T""
Iii
o
::i
o
Do
en
~
c:::
c ni
<(5~
U-E
>'"01/).0
CDQ)n;:;'
E I/) I/) I/)
; 8.. 8.. Q)
Q)OOO)
:5 5.a.-g
1:: Q) 0).0
8..:5 .5 r--.
0.- "0 ~
:;,05CO
I/)c:-O)
>'.2 Q) ~
CDm]i>-
.~ (j) .!2 u.
I/) 0. >
:G00.Q)
L.. o.e
0)"0 - -
~ffi~'O
Q)1::
=c:"Ocu
g .2 0 0.
::s1;:....
o~:t:: I/)
ucucucu
--c:
~~ 1/).2
.- .- 0)-
u _c:~
Q)'- '"
Q)I/)O_
.e CU 0) .-
-.eL..CJ
m~:05
.e:;,>.o
I- 0..0 U
~I
T""
T""
"0
o
.e
I/)
~
.e
-
Q)
.e
-
-
o
c:
o
;
CU
:;,
n;
>
Q)
,
~
.!!
CU
;
:5
'j
-
c:
0)
E
1:: ~.
CU Q)
0."0
Q) c:
00)
~ E
=E
o 0
o..~
0) L..
.el/)
I-CU
N
T""
-
o
L.. c:
B .2
gm
"Oe
L.. Q)
CU E
-g~
cuo.
U5 .~
:!2~
0-
-5i.9
~-
.eC:
I-~
O)C'"
CJ Q)
'5~
0..:;,
Q) I/)
.eL..
::mE
0>.0)
Q)(;j
C:c:>.
.2 0 I/)
m >.en
.aCD~
cu-c:::
a;cu_
cb .~ 0
L..x<(
_eu
cu 0. 0)
~ fij-:5
N
T""
L.. I/)
I/) ~ c:
c: :;'0
0"0 "0 0) 0);
_c:.!!.e~cu
CUCUI/)- :;,
:;, .Q)L..CUn;
n; 0 &.E - > ~
a;.9Q)1::cuw-
L..ol/) .e
~e I/) o.~ iii ~
:5O)cu~~:5~
c:EO) Q)C:
OQ)C: 0) L..o"O .
E 0)';:: CJ 0) E 0) U
CUOC:.e -gO
I/) c: ~ .!2 - 0 - ~
~ cuE l5Q.e~ gC)
cu E Q) .-
o.cuE81/).9Q)Q)
Q) _ Q) .Q.e
L..I/)CU L..Q)_-
o.cu:;'"O o.c:= 0
>._~o"Oo~-
;:;encu.eC:x"01::
C:LL,I/)CUO)OO
0) " 'E- Q) I:: '- 0.
1/)'-' L....o L..Q)
Q)-Q).e0)Q)Q)L..
5.Q)I/)I-_.e0._
_ .~ Q) en M - co ~
1::~.eu.;::'1::~0)
0) Q) - U '" :c 0 T""
EI/)Q) T""~C")_
_L.."Ocuo~-co-
L.. 0'- - X
cu_ ~~I.O 0)0 Q)
g- I/) L.. '0.. 0) I:: - I::
0= o.E;::;CO I/)
cuI:: _0)0)-
Q)CJcu8r--.0);::e
CJO)CJ _E_O)
'5.5 >. == 0 = T"" E
o.."o.Q~"OCJO)1::
L..Q)_ol::.ecu
0) cu L.. -.- :;, - 0.
.eO)Q)jg(j)OL..O)
I- ~:5en o.u.Eo
~
T""
~
UQ)
0):5'E
.eL..CU
-0"0
Q)-I::
"OI/)CU
.- I:: -
>oen
e .-
o.m:!2
o :;, 0
-n;~
"0>0)
0) 0) L..
.!::: 0) ~
:;, CJ
0'"1::0)
~ .!2.~
O)Q.o
.0 Eo..
_0Q)
I::CJ.e
Q)--
Ecu-
1:::;,0
cu I:: I::
0.1::0
0) CU._
o'~ 15
O)O)Q.
.~ I/) en
O.eLL
o..~u
O)~-
:5'G~
1::'-
m:;,o
.e 0';::
I-Uo..
C")
T""
m
1::
cu
0.
I/)
cu
I::
o
;
cu
:;,
n;
>
Q)
.e
CJ
:;,
I/)
0)
"0
'S;
e
0.
I-
Z
w
:Ii
::z:
U
<C
l-
I-
ct
'j(j
-0
I::~
~C)
1:: Q)
CU.e
0.-
0) 0
0-
0)1::
.e 0
- 0.
- Q)
i::'L..
CUCO
1/)0)
1/)0)
O)T""
CJ I/)
Q)-
I:: .-
::'0
I
......
,
"0 I::
o 0) 0
'C (.) :;:;
Q) I:: 0) ~
0. jg .0 n;
~ Eo.- >
0) I:: Q)
.- 0 Q)
> CJ E I::
~ I cu
I:: 1:: .
O)ocuU...:
.5 I:: g- 0 :;,
E"Oo~g
8~ C)O
.el::~ 0
1:: .- .- Q) -
oeo:51/)
-00.. 0)
O)CJ .9:;,
.e_0) c:
_0.e1::;
L.. -01::
.E~mo.o
._ .e 0) CJ
rn ...... ..... '-
CJCU L..>'
; .~ -o'Q) g
~ -g 0 :5 .~
cu .- .e CJ
(;j Q) I/)Q) .5 It=
.QL.. 0)
O)_.eO)"O
I::col-"O_
.;:: 0') .a .s:::.
.9oeng~
'c C") LL .- I/)
0(0<';00)
E --.e
'0.."0-
"01.00)0)>>
"5 0') .s:::. .!::: .s:::.
o;::-:;,~
.s:::._L..0'"
ent::...E~'O
(!)
z
j:.
z
w
:i
w
...I.
a..
;!
Q
w
tJ)tJ)
OZ
0.0
01=
"0
e:<
tJ)
w.
tJ)
z
o
.0.
tJ)
W
a::
u.
1.1.
<
l-
t/)
~ Ql 'j
Lb:5 (jj
0) -
mB.....'ni
T"" Ql ~ E
>-~"ffill)
u. 0 1::--
Ql ......r.
.r. - -.. ~
-(1)-
.S ~ 5j -d
"0 :~ E 8
Ql'OQlI::
co CIl g> QlE -
01::-
~g>CIlE&
CIl -2 :i: 8 -g
~ffi"ffi-..o
I:: Q..9- g I"
oEogQl~
'-'C:: > <0
1I)~a.~~
CIlCllQl .....
.r.....r.1I)
-1;)-Ql>-
c -.-+==lL..
Ql Ql 0 'S;
E 0 .- Ql
1::5j~~=
[ E € Ql .S
Ql E [ II) "C
OOQl,.gQl
Qlo"C_II)
.2 B ... ..: ~
C5-m~-o
a. & >- Ql "C
Ql"c-o~CIl
~ ,g 'E ,.g ~
-.:t
.....
B
II) II) iii
0,8 ~CIlI::
I:: .- 0 -.Q
"0 .,. .- - 0
1::.Q5;.r.1I)1::1::
CIlCllII);<;::I::Q)CIl
>-0_ Ql ~ [~~
:!::::QlOO XO'"
UO =c:Ql_....
SI::OQl a.~
~ 0 .Q a. 1;) ~ ~ ==
CIl 0 -CIl - .- Ql 0
.- Q) 0 II) ... - CIl
5.... ffi I:: "C 0_
e~a.~8-g0"ffi
a.CIll!:!Q) "CO
a. 0 a. ~ ~ "C 0._
CIl 0 Ql .- - .r. 0
_88"CU5Q)~
OQlI::Ql~~Ea.
:t:I::QlS- "CQl
SQlE--I::I:::a
0.r.E.20.n!CIlCll
'0 :: 0 Ql CIl a. Q) .~
.... O.r. l!:!.~ >
.~ 'N 0 - CIl.r. Q) ~
"CO-Ol::~-'"
==~-... ~O
OCllO)I::~ui-"C
I:: I CIl0"CI::Ql .
5 -g ~ Q. m ffi .- "C ~
U CIl m 0 "C II) QlQ) .Q
..... -- -- I:: Q) _
~ - >- 0)"'" CIl 0) I:: CIl
.- ~ I..L. ~ ~ 1;) ffi >- g
UQ)I::CIlI:: .r.1::-
Q) E -- -= CIl 32 0 CIl l!:!
.r.1::_0a.0 II)
- QlQlx.r.5C1lo
_CIlOlOlQlII)-... -...
CIl a. "C I:: Ql Q) "C = "C
.r.Ql~CIl.r..cI::QlI::
~O..o...__CIl~CIl
~
T""
~
Q)
.r.
-
.S
"C
Q)
II)
II)
l!:!
"C
"C
CIl
Ql
..0
'j
o
Ql
..
's;
..
o
CIl
Ql
o
Ql
.r.
-
...
.2....
J!l&
Q)"C
> ~
~..o
0)1"
.S ~
"C<O
1::0)
~O)
lL. .....
1.0
I
N -
I
.....
Ql
....r."C
Ql-I::
€~CIl
.2.r.~
QlOQl
.r.~~
_0"",
1::00
01::Ql
a.~ 0
g-QlS
00)0
~.S ~
~,gc::
.. &.~
o ._
CIl >- I::
O-~
-'2 E
Ql ~ E
~ E 0
.S EU
c: 0 _
000;.....:
0Q)00
= .~ lE ~~g'OOa.
~ CIl Q)
oeoO;
Uo.:5~
~o g 5
t)1::Q)C5
Q) .Q c:: >
.r. (1)-...
: ffi 8.Q
CIl a..r. I::
.r.xOQ)
~Q)cncn
~
~
.....
C)
z
i=
z
W
:e
w
...I
Q.
:E.
-
o
wrn
rnz
00
a._
0....
0::(,)
E!::ce
f/)
w
f/)
z
o
a.
t/)
w
0::
La.
La.
~
rn
0)
c ....
'5.E
l!?.....
;:] c
0.0)
.!!! 5
0.
cE
0) 0
E U
t-
('tiC/)
0. ~ ...:
0) 0:: ('tI
o_:g
~Eg.
.- 0) ....
Ll..u;o.
0) >. C/)
=C/)~
- ..... 0::
cc_
00)0
.- E
:t::: <
:g &u
('tI('tI_
c c ('tI
_('tI(j)
~>
~(/)o
T""-Oo)
.....c
co.....
OU_
.- 0) 0
oO::c
('tI 0) 0
(/)..... .-
...('tIt
,.. .... 0
0)[0.
E O).!:::
('tI (/) 0)
,e('tl=
T""
N
en
~
w
W
a:
u::
C/)
~
0::
(5
<
u 0) t--
~-o .!: ~
0)0)-0<0
E(/)CO)
.- 0 .a 0)
..... a. T""
~e~>-
..... o.~ LI..
t 0)'- 0)
o.c>.c
0...... 0......
g.C5 .Q '0
(/)c~t
>.0 0) ('tI
Qj:+::-Oo.
> ~ 0 (/)
'in~"'" ('tI
(/) o:t:: c
~ S 0
0)-0 (/):+::
~ffiO)g
'0 5 ~ 13
c '- a. c
;:]~o;:]
o~....o
us 8:u
~(/)('tI....
~'.!: O),g
u cD.!: (/) _
0) (/)oc;;('tI
= ('tI ~ (/)o~
.c._ E
ro e -0 0..0
.c;:]>.e;:]
I-Q..QQ.(/)
.....
0)
0)
-0
;:]
.0
T""
NI
N
-
-0
oE
.cO)
(/).....
~ (/)
.c>'
.....(/)
O)C/)
=~
-0::
0_
cO
0<
:+::u
('tI 0)
~.c
('tI.....
>-
0) 0
I
~ C
o
O):+::
.....('tI
('tI=
:+::('tI
.- .....
C (/)
.- .!:
.~ .9
:t::.....
('tI c
..... 0)
(/) ;:]
.....e-
c 0)
0) (/)
E.Q
t~
('tI ....
a.('tI
0) 0)
0>.
0) 0)
.!::: C
Ll..0
N
N
::; 0)
u.c
0.....
0'0
'Ec
~ .Q
Cro
Sc
C/)O)
-oE
o~
.co.
(/) E
0) .-
.c.9
1---
C/)C
~~
we-
QjO)
.!:::~
LI..;:]
0) (/)
.c....
_ ('tI
-0)
0>'
c 0)
.Q 5
ro>.
;:]-
c;;2
> ('tiC/)
% .~ ~
....~~
ro ....0. 0
<
~ g-u
N
N
....
.E
E
~
0)
e
0.
~
....
o
~
-0
C
('tI
-
0)
C)
-0
;:]
.0
0)
.c
-
.!:
....
0)
::::
('tI
E
(/)
:c
-
(/)
(/)
~
-0 .
-0 t--
('tIO)
._ ch
~~
:t::T""
S>-
C/)LI..
('I)
N
cD
0)
0)
-o~2(/)T""
c c ('tI.--
('tI 0)-0 >.0
O)E Q.:t:::-o
.!: E :) .12 5j
E8ffiCiO)
..!2 >.0:: ~=
Q.:a....('tI>.
cDE2~.Q
.!::: e ~ ~ ~
LI.. Q.~ 0)4)
0)0 c-
=-5-0.
_ (/)._ ('tI E
ocs=8
1ii0)C/)~0)
_EO);:].Q
(/)t....(/)
o [i.i: 5j ~
~Q)E E
:0 0 '[: -g t
_ ~2 ('tI,g
.- ~'c _
g(3--oO)
;:]Q)O)mO)
8ro=0=
0_..... ~...
&;oCioe('tl
(3 e c 0.=
0) &~ 5j g
.c('tl....O)
-....('tI.Qc::
ro~fi}(/)~
~ (5 Ci ~ '0,
(/)
('tI
('I)
N
0)
.c
-
.!:
-0
0)
(/) .
(/) c
~..!2
-0 a.
'2~
... ....
Q) 0
.Q~
c;;-g
:g ('tI
0.-
o 0)
....0)
0.-0
(/) :::J
:coO
-co
ro~
.ct--
-0)
-00)
5j;:
ELI..
E (/)
8~
0) 0)
.... E
-ot
3[
o 0)
~o
:t::0)
S.!:::
C/)LI..
...s:
N
I
("')
I
c
('tI
0::
-o(j)
cU;
('tI ('tI
3~
-c
('tI 0
:+::
oS
-6C/)
c 0)
o .!:::
ULl..
00)
.....co
-00)
O)T""
~ -(/)
O)~
=u
0) 0) !Ii
.!:::! = (ij
(/) - 0)
~o>.
0.0)('1)
Ero-
0)-0 X
o a. ~
-;:]
0) 0) 0)
;:]4)=
.!: Ci c
CE:C
Oo:t:::
Uo~
"it
N
.~~>
o
2
j::
2
W
:E-
UJ
..;J
· -11.;
:E
c
W
tntn
02
0.0
OJ::
0::0
0.11(
--
-. f/)
W
f/)
2
o
0.
C/)
w
0::
LL
LL
II(
l-
f/)
~
.9 lU
lJl
lJl lJl
C Q)
o 0
'en Q) .
'~ ~~
....:5~
-g :5 ....-
~'i ~
C.cE
e .... Q)
c..a c..
Q)~Q)
..r::. C/)
- '0
Q)c~
N lU
'm"E ~
~{g~
-c~
~J9g
:t::(J)Q)
lU '0 ....
cno-g
_..r::.lU
c lJl
Q)~Q)
E.c 0
t::1-~
[~.5
Q):'::"C
Cl~a
0)0 0)
c .... c
'~~a
lUQ)O
a:::5~
.....
M
~
::J
<C
::I
U
>- 0<0
c.. ~~~
E \.J.....'[5
o Q).... c
Q.~..r::.Q)Q)
_1-..cE
.9.... EE
:t::.E c.$ 0 .
... 00.0(0
~ lJl 'en Q) 0)
lJl 0).- (J) .9 0)
>..5 ~ 0 .... .....
:!:::""Ctr.-......O'-
U m "0 .... '~ Q)
Q) 0 (;; .g _ .g
me"Cc.oo
,- c. c .... Q) 0
.... lU~:t::
g-c-oQ)c
.... 0 C/) 0 _ .-
2:a:2o:2~
lU 0 0 C C 0
_ 'O..r::. 0.- >-
olUlJl+=-Q)O
~"C~g...c~
,- c: ..r::. "0 _ Q)
'0 ('G I- lU = 'S:
'0 ~ ~ - ~ ~
CQ):.::lUc
~ .- lU :5 0 "0
o ~ ~ '00 "5
U ....O~'s:..r::.
_ lJlQ)lJl
~ lU.!:: Q) .... Q)
.- E 4: ~ ....
U.... c-~:5
Q).g~~--
:5Q)~Q)m~
- m o...r::. ..r::. c
lU ,- 0 - -
..r::.:l:........0Q)
I- .5 0..2 lJl:5
0::
C(
C"il
.....
M
...
Q)
01
"0
~
..c
co
0)
I
""
0)
0)
.....
it
Q)
..r::.
-
0)
c
';::
~
"0
....
Q)
::::
lU
E
lJl
:c
-
lJl
lJl
~
"0
"0
lU
'i
:t::
lU
Ci5
.....
...t
ci)
w
0:
~
m
::J
....-
Q)
c
c
('G
E
>.
Q)
E
+=-c
lU lU
.5 a::
....
Q)- .$
~ lJl
lU lU
~~
"C~
5 e!
0:9
-...J
"0""
Q)co
Q)O)
c:.....
~ _lJl
- >.
-
~u
~ Q)
1;)-5
.9'0
lJl Q)
~m
,5R
c~
o c
UlU
'ltl
.....
...t
,!!!
..r::. Q)
- ....
....lUO)
o C
lJl .-
Q) Q) c
(;; ~ ~
~~a.
lU'- I
Q) ~ ~
.....- Q)
lU:l:~
lJl lJl lU
C ~;!
Q) lU lJl
E .... lU
t::,gw
lU_Q)
c.c..r::.
Q)lU-
0>0)
~c
~~ 'i
'c m'~
C..r::. >
.m-~
Q.Q).....
"0:;0
C lJl Q)
lU C lJl
.".."Q):;
1;..-_ 0
e! ~ 0
:9"CQ)
...Jc:5
~ lU.5
::ClJlCii
0~l3~
:t::lU....O'
lU~"CO
Ci5 ~ -g Q.
-
N
'<t
~ ~.
I
Q)
"C:5-g
CCllU
('G c _
E ';:: t::
._ ~ 0
Q)"C~
c"C
.- Q) C
m Q),Q
:5:-2m
lJl ~
~5Cii
::l 0 > .,;
lJl Q) v.
c~cbt::
Q):;....~
0.... c Q)
-Q)lU
:t:: .... - 0)
lUlUQ.c:
..... '- .-
lJll3.$~
o~lQ.m
,~ .!!! ~ c.
"0 0) Q) "5
=c~c:
OElUlU
5lJl;!0:::
o ~ lJl >.
U lU WlU lU
.... -
m:9Q)O
..r::.-..r::.
....................~
~ 5i '0 '0
lJlCQ)Cl
Q)lUlJlC
::l E .... 0
C-....::lQ)
Q)Q)0..r::.
0::: a. 0_
~-,
N
'<t
,)L)
'i '0
C) e:
a.. e: :J
Z U 0
0 ... t)
t=: 'iij .E
..... .:; 0
z 0) i:S (/) ...
W I (J,) "E
c.o ~
:E 0) 0) lU
0) :J
W ..... e: 0 ~
> 'C: (/)
.... (J,) .E
ct u. (J,) 0)
(J,) e: e: (J,)
:E '0,:0 (/)
.c 0
:~ ... e: e: .c
- W :J ...
Q 0 -
1:: ...,j ~ 0)
W0 e: e:
lU (J,) ~ 'C:
0Z 0. E e: .0
(/) (J,)
O. 1:: :2
a.. 0 lU lU 'i
Ot=: '0 0. .9
(J,) (J,) '0
O:fO (/) a (/) e:
Q:<C (/) 1:: lU
~ (/) ~
~ iii
0 '0 ...
~ (J,) ...
W '0 e: '0
0 lU 0) (J,) (J,)
Z (J,) .2 e: E l;::::
.0 '0 (J,) ~
0 :0 0) > e:
a.. 'i :J e: o (J,)
a.. 0 "''0
0 0..-
... (J,) (/) .~ ~
W (J,) :!:::
:::: .c lU
0:: ... (J,) (J,)
lU -
E 0 :J 0) >.
u.. e: lU (J,)
u.. (/) :s:: ~ e: .c
lU e: .~ ...
.~ :E ... 0 (/)
I-- CJ) 0 '0 lU
U)
..... N
10 Iri
w
C)
<C
Z
~
C
'0
e:
lU
.c
0..
~~
'C: 9,)
.9~
.- (J,)
at-
E~
(J,)'"
0)'"
lU.E
.5 a..
lU_
-uU
rn~
e: I
o c.o ,';
~O)Q)
:oO)~
'O;::J
lU La.. 0
(J,) 0
=~(J,)
(J,) ... 0)
>e:lU
o .- e:
... '0 'cu
o.(J,)'"
0.(/)'0
lUOe:
'0 g. g,
5 Ci. ffi
O(/)U
t) e:._
....20)
~mg>
I--Ci)a..
.01
.....
Iri
(J,) 0
(J,)0)(J,)0e:
E~=-;;(J,)
o .- 0 1:: > ffi
lU~"'O~
e'O~:s:: .c
0..'0 ~ (J,) ~ ~
lU~.o-g~e
(J,) (J,) 1:: (/) '0' =
~(J,)00'"
lUe:o.c..c..e:
1::...(J,)0~0
(J,) .E ... Ci.~-~
-g (/) -g '0 .2 2
:J(J,)lUe:o..m
o~ _lU
"':JlU(/)-ge:
:s::o:m'Ol;::::~
~ (/)> (J,)~'-
(/)0) o.e:O)
e: lU (/) (J,) (J,)
2:o'Se:2.o
.!!! e: .c 0.. (J,) 0
0...2 t) e: = ...
0_e:0 '0
o..~Ciit)om
o.e:Ci)O-e:
lU(J,)(J,):ElU
'O&.~(!)~~ .
~ e: (J,) 1::
.- '0 .- (J,) (/) - 0
'0 (/)= (J,):e
==e:c"P'O .~(J,)
00 ....E:J
e:~(J,)Ee:(J,)o(J,) :A
:J lU lU .c (/).~ VI
o:J(J,)-"'O)(/) 0:::
t) rn > '0 e: e: (/) W
... > e e: .-.- ~ ~
lU q> c..5~-g 0)
r= ~ .~ t) -g .2 ~ ~
N
Iri
'0
~
'5
C"
~
e:
o
~
o
lU
...
(J,)
.c
1::
.2
o
e:
E
~
0)
e
0.
0)
e:
'0
0)
e:
o
e:
lU
.~
(/)
:E
I--
.....
<0
.9e:
(/) .~
1::.2
~:Sai
(J,)(/)g>
(J,) (/) ~
> (J,) I
E 5 ~c
:J (/) 0 lU
(/)e:-Q:
a(J,)(J,)_
0-5=~
-g:EQ)~
lU ~ (J,) (J,)
:s::e:E(!)
lU.!!!O'O
Ci) 0..... 2
"5 .2 ~ g.
0.0)0'0
o.2[lU
:J~lU(/)
(/)"'0-
o(/)...~
"'lU5iU
(J,)o.E(J,)
~.Q...=
~~lE-
5 (J,)J::; 0
o -c (J,) (/)
== >. 0) -g
O"iii lU (J,)
e::J~e:
5 .2 5l ...
t):!::: :J
...-g~.g
lU 0. :J ==
r=~:2~
cOl
.....
<0
-
(J,) 0
'01::
~lU
go..
._ (/) c.o
=lU~
~(/).....
1:: -
- 0-
e::s::rn
.2 (J,) u.
.~ (J,) e:
.~ (/).-
O(J,)t)
0)= 0
.5 -0 :E
Cii (!)
~ :g (J,)
'0, E =
e: 0 0
w,B'"
- 5 1::
c_o
(J,)(/)o.
E.a~
1::~'O
lU(/)-
o.(J,)o
(J,).c~
O"'(J,)
(/)ol::
~-;;I--
~lU~
e: ~
o .2 (J,)
~~CI)
~Bx
(/) (J,)
(J,) .- e:
.c'O(/)
t-lU:!:::
I
LO
I
(J,)
.c
.~ ...
.cO)'
"'e:c.o
_._ 0)
0"'0)
:J.....
(/)'0
3U cri"
(/)0.0
~:E 0
'0
~(!)O
.o(J,)e:
lU .c ._
'ffi~0)
>...e:
lU '-
(J,) '0 g
.c2(J,)
... e: E
m51E
.c(J,)0
......0
(/)0..
"'(J,)(J,)
:g.oo
:J ... >-
0'"...0
~ ~ ~
... (J,).~
(J,) 0) >
.ce:~
1:: .-
:Je:-c
_ e:_
t).!!!,g
o 0.. (/)
:E.2 ~
rn O).c
'-'(J,)'"
(J,)mx
.cJ::;(J,)
I--(/)e:
d
z
i=:' .
z
w...
. :::Ii<
W
....I,.,
o.r
:::Ii
-.
0.. .
w. ,'"
o v,
~~
oi=:
Q:O
0..<
-
0.
w.,
o
.z
o
0..
o
W
0::
u.
u.
<
I-
o
,!!!
.c
-
o
-
c:
o
~
c:
~
E
E
8
lU
"0
c:
Q)
l/)
'j iii
:t:::t)
lU 'C
- -
l/) l/)
_:0
c ~
Q) Q)
E-
ffi ~
g-:;
oE
~.9
'2: t)
C Q)
~:t:::
a..Q)
...-
r--:
Q!
w
I-
;
"0
C
lU l/)
~:g J?
:o~ ~
~"Oo_
'ffi ~ l/) l/)
>2~~
lUlU-O
Q)~~o.
~ l/) Q)
~ - ~
"5~"Ol/)
_oc:....
_-lUlU
O.cl/)Q)
(JO~ >.
'0..0 ~ X
.9roQ)~
Q):;1:c
:;"0 Q)'-
ocl/)-
_lU~C
Q) a. Q)
.c.....Q)E
-2.c a.
OlU-..Q
-~-Q)
c: 0 >
~~c:~
'0, E ,2 ~
Q) 'ffi ~ 2
.oo~lU
Q)(J~
l/) ~ l/)
ao:O~ ,
.E Q) ~ ,5 U
-C)~lUO
lUlU-oOO:::
.cl/)(JQ)"::::
I- ~ ,S ~ (!)
~I
...-
r--:
"0
~
':;
r::r
Q)
~
c:
o
+:0
(J
lU
o
c
-e
~
Q)
C)
c
'0
C)
c:
o
C
lU
.!!!
.!!!
.c
I-
N
i"
.9-g~
.......~o.
300.
> a. ~
uEl/)
.- "0
..ll::Q)cc
.l/)O:;OlU
~~"OQ)Q)
uoc(JC).
_lUc:~.c
Q):t:::l/)Q)o~
:; ~ ,~ -g in e
~l/)g~1:C)
00. t) Q) Q) Q) Q)
Q) 0)"0 .- ~
o.~... (J~
~ ,- ". lE -
l/)"O ~ ~~.a
0"02'0 l/)_
-ClU~lUO
Q)lU~"O l/)
~...- ~ C)"O
C.....lU Cc:
g~~O~~
(J<(.c~Q)Q)
- - ... > "0
=Q)OOQ)
g .c .0 0)"0 J?
~-.c-"O-
o.c~~c:_
U~~_lUQ)
~ ~ Q)
Z._~E >.E
U 5j ,~ J? 8:.9
Q)Ero-~..ll::
.cQ)'-,- .....
->Q)Q)~O
~~g-€~.!
I- ,S 8.a ~ ~
N
r--:
., .
~
.E
l/)
-
c
Q)
E
~
lU
a.
Q)
"0
"0
Q)
-
(J
&
lU
Q)
.c
-
0
-
"0
~
~
~
~
Q)
.0
"0
"'3
0
.c
l/)
~
Q)
:: Q)
lU l/)
E c:
0
l/) a.
:.c: l/)
I- ~
('t)
i"
-
I
co -..
I
~lU~ 1:
'2: ro ffi Q)
C.c> E
~-"O a.
Q.ElUE..Q
III .!::: .c 2 ~
..ll:: 1: ,!!! ~ Q)
oOc..l/)"O
~~EQ;~
_o_c:
(J (J lU .-
~s~~~
C 0
~ Q) 0 0)....
Q.E-C:l/)
Q)~ii):O"O
.c lU ,- ~ c:
-o.XlUlU
-Q)Q)C)E
oCl__~Q)
:t::: = "0
~~~s~
l/)'- ~ c: 0
_u.o~;:o:
~ "0 III = Q)
~CQ)o.~
.- lU 0 a. lo: ,
"0 ."OlUQ)~
'5 ~ l/) t) = .!!!
s'iij ~,!!?.- >
05(Je$~
U:J:eo.E~
0.0 .c
~-g"O-.9u
UlUQ)c~C
.... 0 ..-. '-
J?C)~:ai~2
_ c: .- (J ~ l/)
-'5"Elo: r::rQ)
lU=O+:OQ)~
~ ~ 8 g -g ,S
-.
('t)
i"
C)
z
j::.
z
w
:i ..
LLI
..I
a..
:i
......
o
W(/)
(/)Z
~O
OJ::
Q:(J
!!:<
(/)
w
(/)
z
o
a..
(/)
w
Q:
u.
La.
<
....
(/)
"OQ)~
cuffi~:
I/)c:Elrl
CUo a.
.- Q) x
C:ni>Q)
.Q Q) ~
1/)........."0
::Jol/)C:
o~_cu<o'
c: c:_
'- Q) a.. 0>
...."OE-O>
J2ffit:a..~
a.. I/) ['tij lii
c:: ~ cQ) ~ -g
Q)cu -
.ca...cQ)8
- Q) cpS
~-=.oC)B
.~ '0 '0 :S 5
5 I/) :t:: !'~
-=EjgE
::J cuCJ) 0"0
cu5 o~
~eu)c:J!!
I/) a. - .- a.
5..:.=:~I/)E
._ .... E I/) 0
>ot:Q)o
~~cu5Q)
a.Q)a.e.o
I/) .c cQ) a. 0
cu- -
.cc: cC:
_ .- C) CU CU
.- _ c: 0 -
o O'C'- a.
C:Q)c:~ot::
5 'e-.!!! a, cu....
() a. a.. . iii "0
~
cx:i
z
o
i=
c(
w
a:
(.)
w
a::
c
z
c(
U)
:lI::
a::
c(
D..
c:
CU
c::
c:
o
+:;
CU
Cu .
Q)o<O
Eoo::~
Q)..:;~
c.. c> _
E Q) lii
-.coO
":'=:-0
ffi~Q
a...cO
~ ~.s
-Q)Q)
ni:Oo
.cCU:>'
_750
o>~
~ CU.~
:o-gii)
=cu"'"
0"0 X
c: Q) Q)
::J_c:
8.9l1/)
0._
~E .-
.- 0 I/)
uo~
Q) Q) c:
.c.oQ)
:.-.E
CU a.. E
.cC::o
1-_0
=1
~
cx:i
t 0.:
8. a..
Q) Q)
.!a n::: _ .c
"O-cu-
....cu.c.c
~~-~
c:c:C)~
jg c( '2 c:
I/)Il').oo
"O~=u
o~~C:
.c ::J
I/) I/) :t:: 'c-
Q)- CUo
....u-o
.co I/)
- c:
Q) :E c'-
-= ('!).Q c:
oQ)o~
-.cQ)a.
..........= 0
c:O"O"O
Q)-=CU
E - 0....
"OxC:O
c:'- ::J.....
Q)"OO"O
E ~ () ffi
cu&:5~
"0 c( 'i:: 0
Q) a......
.!a .S 0 -
> _ c:
Q)"O_Q)
....~c:E
ot::c:CU"O
CUQ)::Jc:
.... I/) I/) Q)
"O~SE
c( a. a.. CU
N
cx:i
I
f'-.
I
(ij -
~ Elii
-"00.0
Q)....""-O
NCU....O
.- "0 0 0
(ijC:""-
sjg~c:
li:CJ)c:CU
o .... .c
-"O::J-
:t::o'Q)....
cu.c....Q)
(;j~"o~
Q),Cffio
nil- _c:
'i:: - a..
a.C:x-
e~:oa..
a.cuC:Q)
a. Q) Q) .c-
CU .... 0.-
o a..c
-Q)c(-
0Q) n::: 'S;
.... c: ~
.- "0 .-
"Oc:"OC:
= CU Q) .Q
01/)-'0..
c:..:.=:C:o
::J....Q)"o
Uo a..nl I/)Q) nl
....
:>.ot:: a. C)
~ CU - .s
()~~ffi
Q) -E~
.s~"00 .
_1/)Q)C:=<o
nl'- .00>
1-.cii)E::JO>
.... CU a.~
N
co
..~ r '
"
Z
:......::-'.
...
Z
w
:&.
W
..;.;.J
a.
:&
......
Q
Wen
~z
0.0
Oi=
0::0
e:<
en
W
en
z
o
a.
en
W
0::
u..
I.L
~
en
~
co
-
lI)
.90)
.:.:: .~ Q)
coO-.c
.ccolfi-
0.c0)
::I"'O)~
lI)~::I+:;
E co lI) ~
"'E"E:o
.E COc
Q) 0 .-
.9;a:l-o
lI)"'_c
Q) ~ .2 co
.: Q).b ...
lI) ... lI) Q)
Q) .- Q)
-o:2C~
- ::I Q) 'E-
.- O.c
....c-E
Q)lI)oo
;._ - 0
Q)oc.c
.cco::l
~ ::I ._ lI)
~o-
Q) (,) ~ co
co -'2 U
00::1
.- lI) E ::I
"0_ lI).
.~ - E '0 iil
-0.0 l!?
Q)0_Q)
5~co53c
.c ~ -0 E'-
lI)E....cll)
E co -
._ ::! lI) =
oor:::-o
coo.cc
::I.c..-CO::l
0::10000
(,)lI)_Q)(,)
..-
a)
UJ
..J
o
o
:r:
o
UJ
iii
0)
C
:oc
C 0
coG:+:;
E _lI) ~
... >-.-
O-o~
-.aE
"ElI)Q)
co--
o .~.~
a:lO'"
1'"'\ a.. g.
....Q)...
0000.
w"'o..
>5co
(,)00'0
Q)Q)-
.c.cc
--Q)
-oQ)E
cmo..
co ::I 0
'0 (ij Qj
C > ~
::IQ)-o
0.9 ...
(,) Q)
>-~:2
6~ ~ .
Q)E8lfi
.c Eo....
- 0 OJ,
-o-~
co ..0 "0 co
~~lijt;
oil
..-
a)
-
C
co
...
...
.:.::-co
o 0 ~
~E-
"'t,-O
:e.Ec
~~.g
_:9(1)
o lI) Q)
lI) lI)
coco
oo.Q)
:;Q)b
co c c
..2 0'-
coQ)-tri
~ .c 53.~
Q)oE~
-0--0
..2-oeJ!!
.~ * 53 -g
-0:2-0-0
3~~lij
0000.
.c 0 .!!!, x
lI)lI)eQ)
c'- c....
.Q U Q) 0
~E(j;~
~~~~
'in g' c -
c = 0 lij
0::1+:;0
o-oCOl;:
m~g'2
.c 0'- 0)
..... lI) E 'in
-oc
c Q)
co E
- 0.
lij.Q
c::~
-Q)
c-o
o Q)
.::...
>-::1
~:a
:2>-
::! c
co
-g;
~ 'i
Q.c
0.0
co+:;
Q) 0
;5
c .C'
.- 0
-00
~.~ cti
lI) -0 l!?
l!? Q) co
-ogJlI)
~l!?E
lI)-O::
.;: ~ .E
~Q)lI)
co.c(ij
E:2 ~
lI)::Io.
E~e
.....lI)o.
N
a)
(5
o
.c
o
Q) lI)
.cll)
...c: ~
- -
oc-
.coO
...
....>.5
c co .-
Q).cco
E lI).Q)
0. ->- ~
.Q~E
~(,)=
Q)Q).2
-0 .c
,-"-~
o c.-
....... 0 ::I
co C'"
E-l!?
>-~ 0
cc_
co Q)
_-0-0
CO'- Q)
.cll)c
-l!?o
ooc::E
lI)O-o
~c5
lI) -0.0
oc>-
_co_
Q)
lI)--
Q) ~.~ .
~ c Q.~
+:;~e~
c .- 0. 0..
olfio..E
(,) ... co '_
N
a)
Q)
-0
'>
e
0.
-0 ..:
c Q)
co 15
....E
53 .~
E.c
Q)-
lI) Q)
'> ~
-0...
co ::I
...0..
~.9
c lI)
::I Q)
Q).c
::I lI)
lI)'-
.~ ~
-
lI)'-
E(j;
-.c
~Q)
co.c
- ~
:2 0
::1-
o lI)
.c co
lI)
c
'o.Q
50
o l!?
(,):0
C")
0)
o
- tri
-g"E (5
... co 0
"'0 .c
....a:l_~
53c~.c
E ~ .Q .Q)
~ ::> c..::I:
.- en 0 Q)
> .:.::
-0 Q)C co
CO.cQ);;
s...........U)(J)
Q) .c Q) co
-Oo"'w
ccoo.
::I 0 Q)-O
Q)....cc
::I 0._ co
lI) 0.. C> co
lI)COc-
:~ .9 'E :5
;lI)CO...
Q) C>~
~.~ l!?'2
coQ).co
--oocc
'0 ~ ~ (;
cs....'-~
::I Q) 0. lI)
o.co.co
(,)"Q)col!?
>-.c ~ co
- ~.-
OQ)Q)Q)
_0
~ .~ ~ lij
-E(ij-o
_Q)>c
co_Q)Q)
~~l!?15
C")
a)
<( -0<(
0.. Q) 0..
en.9~OOlI)
Q) 0.. Q) .-
.cco.c;
.....,Q)I..........
-oEo.c~
cQ)Q)oco
co .!::: ; c .a
ai 5-.c .Q lrl
::IQ)~o~
gJ"'~coQ)
.- lI) -
lI)E Q) 0)=
E - g .~ ~
-Q)coEo.
'O-o"Egco
..20.c::!
l!?ggt::c
co .- co.E 0
~ 0 .-
co -.= lI).~
Q) -0 "= .~
"'Q)-g:g
co-oo::l::l
~cooen
coQ)U(,)
-Ell) Q)
lI)co _>
C> .cco+:;
ccC>>co
'2 ~ E e c
c.c 00 o..~
co lI) ... 0.. r-
C::col;:CO-o
.c.cQ)oc....
oo...c COc
c -lI)cQ)
cottQ)5coE
O::o..g;EC::l!?
>- Q) co -0 Q)'5
2!c>ccO"
oo~gOl!?
_.
-.:t:
0)
I
CO
I
-
c .cQ)
OQ)oc C>"'c>
_ .c .c 0 .~ Q c
co ~ lI) -0 .-
>(5~<( lI)c~
eo-oo.. ~co~
o.ulijOOoecco
o.lI) c= o.co.c
co - .- .c -0..
_.cQ) ::IQ) Q)
o .Q)oc 50.. -0 -;:;:; co
lI).c +:;lI)..2~~
ciil<(gtg~TI
.Q .!::: 0.. ... Q) .- Q) co
~ - en 00 .~ -0 n, -
-OQ) ce-'-"o
c.c.9 00..::1 lI)-
0_ 0 0_ c
0__ Q) ~..:::-co
.co53;;lI)oc::
c> 0 .- .-
::I ~ co ~ .~ ~ Q) -
e~'i5'Q)lI) ;53
;~comc--:'oE
-O......Q)O"-o.
l!?_O~ELLlI)O
::ICOCCQ)LLcQj
lI) .c .;:: Q) ... 0.. Q) >
c - ;; E .- --- Q)
Q) -"i E 5- c E C
_Q) Q)"'-O
'0 C Q) 0 ... ~ c (ij
cO~O.co..Q)...
::I<(lI)-c~Q)EQ)
Oo..COQ)~oC053
(,) en 0 0. C ~ (!)
..:::- -.Q~~co
.- .c -0 Q) C .- lI) .c
(,)0 Q)> coLLlI) 0
C_Q)-c Q)C
Q)COCO-O"'lfioco
;0:: (j;Q)8:;::Q)0::
_>-Qj.co;:C>-
COcoo-coo>-co
~ is ~ ~ .~ ~ lij 5
~,
"V
a)
C).'
z
j:..
z
w
::i
UJ
..J
a..
::i
....,:.
c
WUJ
~z
0..:0
OJ:
0::(,)
e:<
UJ
W
UJ
Z
o
0..:
UJ
W
0::
u..
u.
~
UJ
-"
Q)
.c:
-
-
o
III
C
o
+-
:0
C
8
.5
"0
Q)
III
III
~
"0
"0
cu
C
Q)
Q). .
.0'0
:>'.!!!.
Ciie
50..
.- III
> .-
Q).c:
...-
a....
1IlJ2
CUo.
.c:cu
Cu E
-
- Q)
cu >
E+-
1Il~
:.c ai
1--
Ll)
oi
III
~ a.
Q)~ .9cu 0
~c ...~-o
"Q) 0 O.c:
'-' E 0 'C C 00 (,)
- E - o...Q J: III
~ 0 "0 ~.!!! ~ .c:
(,) C;, .~ 00 .2>
Q) cu '-' "0 .c:
.c:~ _Q).oQ)...
--1Il.c:;:'.c:0
- 0..'0_00-
o E .- ... Q)
...o~.9(ijJ2=o
Q) "'0.'- C "0
0.. "0 C u:: C .-
OO_Q) cuE
Q)-oE>->
>-0 cQ)~
Q)ci.c:~cuQ)cu
"0 U ~ cO)'"
~ - .c: Q)E .5 ~ ~
Q)C_ 1Il(ij;:'
C Q) 0 E III .- 13
Q) [~ 8 ~ g .5
.c:o_ 00._
- .- .c: ... III 0
Q)Q)~(,)o..Q)c
0)> ;:''''1Il
cu Q) III III J2 .- III
"'Oc_ 1IlQ)
;:, 0 0 0)'- 0
o ~ ~ C .c:1- "0
(,) ...., .- Q) +- -
ai-C5g5r .~
~ C) Q) 0 ... .~
~gQ)"O(,)ge
l5 '0' c.;; cu.O' a.
Q) 5. 5 Q) _Ill 5. Q) .
.c: _+- Q)~Q)~ 1IlQ)
- .... CU"O .- .-
_ (,) 0) '>- U .c: Q) ~
cu C.- - (,) =
.c:cu~eQ)...c(,)
I- c::: E a. ~ J2 '(i; J!!
Ll)
oi
'0.9
cuQ)-
III 0
.c:;:'0
(,)"0"5
;:, Q) III
III ...
E cu E
... .c: 0
o III ...
- -
OCIll
-CUQ)
(,)'C
III it: cu
~'c: >
.- 0)
~'(i; m
"0 ;:,
~ ;i..c:
...c(,)
Q) Q) ;:,
.c:...1Il
-...-
Q) ;:, 0
~uQ)
Q) . >
-~~
~ ~ Q)
.- E .c:
~EI-
"08ui
S.oti
0;:"-
.c:IIlX
III Q)
_ Cllll
'0.5.!!l 15
c"O~o
;:,c=.c:
o cu (,) (,)
UtiJ!!1Il
co
oi
I
(J)
I
-
0"0
~ Q)C
.- ~ III cu
U ... Cl;:'
Q)oc"OO)
.c:~:OQ):5
:: .9 m m 'if
o Cl.c: 0 .
1Il~~IIl(,)~
... - Q) Q) .-
Q) cu >-.c: .c: ~
.0 ~ Cl - _ '0
E(,).$5oJ!!
Q)EQ)~o-:>
.oti.olll~
- -...cuQ)
(,)IIlCO C
Q)"OCU-=_
Q)mc..lIl~o
1Il0CUO -
_/D >IIlC
o_o..cucuQ)
(,)OQ) _E
Q) 'C - "0 III a.
~ ti ~ cQ) .!!l .Q
.- :0 Q) ~ Q)
E "OQ)=>
g"8 .9 ~.M ~
~-fi~~"O"O
....""cu CC
~lIlticCUCU
~ '0 III 0)
Cl 0 .$ '~"O C
.5 .0 .~ ~ 3 '0
"0"00..= 0 C
ffi C 0'0'" ~
ti cu 5. J!! Cl it:
cu '5 0.. - g>"O
C cu 0._ Q)
-;:,.c:Oti...
~ 0 ~ 13 'x ~
I-U~IIlQ)1Il
co
oi
L~~ "'<I
Ji
C)
2
t::
2
W
::E
UJ
...oJ
.0.
::E ...
-:,.'.
o
~U)
02
0.0
Ot::
"0
o.<c
~
U)
W
U)
2
0...
0.
U)
W
a:
u.
LL
<C
I-
U)
o
-
a..
~.....
lJ) I-..c:
~ E 0) .Q)
oo."'C e! ..c: ~ 2
C en - .....-
emo-o-
0. ....m-o
.-::.o..=ffi1:::
c: 2:; en lJ) 0) m
.Q ..:::: .S: 0) >- c.
lJ) I- lJ) > r-- lJ)
:~ -E ~ ~ 0 m
o 0..0)-lJ)
m ..oIOC
en....C 0
cenoc-o..
'i:: 0 .- .Q 0) 0
0)....-lJ)-0)
0) a.. m .- lJ) .......
c 1::: .~ 0) e
'c, ~ &.0 5- 0.
C'i:: lJ) en 0) 0)
wOcc....o
;t:: e!'i:: 0) C .
.....col-O)..c:mo
C O)-EO
O):!: lJ) cO)""
E 0 ~'c,:2 0 ~
1::: !E .- c > 't: C>
~e!~we~O)
O)I-..c:O)o...c:=
o _..c:-o
- -=~o
lJ)mCi -~lJ)-
.:.::: ~ ....
....cO)O)lJ)O)C)
oc_..c:1:::"'Cc
~mm(j)o~t
lJ) "'C OllS:: - 0
o~o.oO)go.
= ~ I- a.. .- 0)
.g ~ .2 a.. :== .::
a.. c -0 -a..' I- ~ m
~o ~
0) C 'i:: a.. "'C "'C c
~8~t:.ffiffiffi
~
o
~
o
u:
LL
~
....
c ....
00-
'w - m
.- lJ) ~
.~ c c
Coc
.- m
OlO lJ)
cO)~
.- '0'
Q;L.......
0)0.0
.S: 0) ~
~go.
WmlJ)
0) E m
..c:.... -
-.g(j)
-0)0)
o 0.-=
~ en
.- ....
"'C13J:
'0 >. lJ)
cr--m
~o..c:
0_0
UIO:::J
~ lJ)(j
.- 0) ul 0
0-gQ)~
~o~C>
_ .S: tj 0)
co.9cu5
:5 0) 'i:: 0
0)-
2~~Ol
lJ) ~ m c
0) c '-
~oo1:::
CT 0 .CU' &.
O)OEO)
~- ....
~I
~
c:i
~
D=~
cu CJ)ffi_
0)_lJ) E O)~~
=~~""Ol:5....Ol
'0 .... U u ..e .S .c en ~
5 ~ 0) 0) .: g, ~ m
OE..c:..c:O)c~>-c
o --=o>--.::~
OclO -~
:>. - :2 m ~.s: ~ ~ "'C
"'C .... _ m .- 0) 0 .2 0)
~ 0) .- ~ co _ - 1::: lJ)
-'E~ _omOmO
CJ) 0 r-- .- 0. Ol 0. 0.
2 C\I "'C .- C 0
en c c .S: .2 'v .-::. ....0.
c .- 0) 0) 1::: -.
'0 ~ E c <0 m 0 ~ 0)
ffi== o.o~d\ 0.~0=
co_ r-->-lJ)-
.- m 0) c ~ Q) .- ..c:
LL->O > O)Ol
10=0) -ci..-g~~
C\I.a"'Cczom~e
~ _ .Q m E ..c:
1000~coLOE-
~ = lJ) :g .Q - C\I 0 lJ)
en...."'Cm'5lJ)"'";"Oc
E.E~co~~ 0)
'i:: c - lJ) C CJ) i::' E
O)"C .0).. Oc
-c 0)0) c m ~ c Ol lJ) C)
o 0) 0 C .- =
-c......"'Co'5~m
0)0)~<(~lS::....<(0)...;
=..c:~Co.mm -0
-omo_C)lJ)~O)
Ol"'C .: - "C CJ) 0) co.......
cO)oo..m ....O)....e
"0. N _ - . lJ) .~ ;;; 0.
.- m = 1::: 0) ~ .l.l:!
oc5....00..0-..c:
"'C Ol"'C 0) co.':; c 0
m 0 _ c ~ 0.'- 10 0) C
C ~ '3 ,~ UO ~ 0 C\I 15 2
_......0"-' lJ)m~o......
C\I
c:i
~
-
o
-
c
0)
E
0.
o
Q)
>
0)
"'C
....
.E
lJ)
c
m .
a.~
1:::=
o 0
0.S!!
0.>-
~ m
lJ) ~
~'5
0)-
>
..
o
m
....
o
>.
m
'0 ~
c 0)
~ 0)
o ....
0-
10
~C\I
<30:=
O)CJ)
=3
--
m 0)
..c:..c:
1--
C\I
c:i
~
0)
..0
'j .~
lJ)..c:
~o
m c
"'Cm
o.~
~
LLfO'
155
x~
0)-
c ....
O).E
..c:
-0.
- 113
CUE
>
ecu
o.c
o.ii:
m_
lJ)
<(~
a..
CJ)O)
_..c:
0-
0)
g 0
Em
"'C..o .
c"'C-g
8 ~ >
113'3 e
lJ)C"~
<(~m
'<'"':
~
~
.:.i
0(
o
UJ
u:
'E
'm
~"'C
O)oc
i::'..c: .. .$
"'Cm-o.lJ)uj
ffilJ)O)E-O)
~:;~oco
~OlJ)~c'&.
!E ~ lB m .Q ~
m .... lJ)
_"'COO)~LL
lJ)c-..c:u15
0) m ul 15 .S:
co~ffi"'CO)~
~O)O)c..c:-
C"'- >. m - -
O)~OlJ)Oo
"'C....:o!!--..c:
m_~lJ) 0
cog08cO)13
..c:"'C-
-cO)~Ec
0) 0 c == ~.-
.... 0 0 0 .- lJ)
~ .9 i::'S!! g. g
c 0) .-
O)"'C~ul""O
= -8 0) g m .~'g .:; lJ) .. 0) e
~0u...~"'C0.
o a. 15 '0'.2 ..c:
o ....o~
>. ~ 0) 0..S: S
~m..c:-"'Ce
OlJ)::O:;Ol
0)0)0>-0....
=~0)~~13
-5co:;lJ)~
m lJ) "'C 0.- 0)
~~g.~~~
::1
~
~
~
. t......
-.
I
o
~
I
--
-
o
0)-
:E1:t::
C)<(
:E
Z:E
0:)
Ci)C/)
~C/)
:EZ
:EQ
0.....
00
.....<(
J:C)
C)z
C/)~
I:t::Z
ww
>:E
Ow
.......J
zo..
w~
:E-
Wc/)
C)z
<(0
Z-
<(.....
:E<(
C
J:Z
~~
O:E
1:t::0
C)O
It)W
enl:t::
en
-
C)
Z
~
Z
w
:E
W
..J
0..
:E
c
wcl)
c/)z
00
0..._
0......
0::0
e:<c
c/)
W
c/)
Z
o
0..
c/)
W
0::
u..
u..
i5
c/)
Z
o
~
<(
c
Z
w
:E
:E ...
o
o
W
0::
o
o
:E
C)
-
G)
:E
-
o
Z
tI)
"t:I
'0
.c
tI)
!
.c
.....
"0
Q)
.c"O .
:!::: CU 0>;:-
~ Q).!: N
g>.c -g E
:.s2~:J2
.... 0 u. .-
o 0
~:!:::o.:-
1/)--1/)
.- CU U Q)
"0 .c .-
C~I"-a.
CU I/) q> g.
:!2:!2~0
.c.c0>1/)
cuQ)"-ro
>-
"O.cu.1/)
Q) - '-
>~Q).c
.- """ - I-
Q)'O~"""'"
00_ .
~Eo~
I/) t:: c
cu~cuIi=
.c2a.~
C .~ :g Q)
Q) a. .c
E 0 = 0
_....0_
.... a. c
cua.:J"O
a.cuOQ)
Q)oUQ)
0_ c
Q)-
~0:5~
="0 >.1/)
OC.c1/)
0.. Q) C
> C 0
Q) 0 :;::;
.cQ)a.a.
1-:5:J0
..-
..-
w
o
:J
o
D..
(j)
~
0:::
25 nj
<{oE
U"""E
~"OI/).c
Q)Q)ro:J
E I/) I/) I/)
:;::; &.&.0)
Q)OOO>
:5 a. a. -g
t:: Q) o>.c
&.:5 .!: I"-
a._"Oq>
:J03<O
I/)c-~
>.OQ)..-
03:;::;::0
.~ ~ .!!1 (t
I/) a. >
:fioa.Q)
.... o.c
0>"0 - -
o>cQ)-
CU CU > 0
Q)t::
=C"Ocu
g .Q 0 a.
:J--
o,m:t:: I/)
UCUlllCU
--c
~~ I/).Q
.- .- 0>-
U .cl6
Q)~U-
.c III Q)'-
-.c....o
1Oe'05
.c:J>'0
l-a..cU
~I
..-
..-
"0
o
.c
I/)
~
:5
Q)
:5
-
o
c
o
:;::;
CU
:J
ro
>
Q)
,
~
Q)
-
CU
:;::;
:~
'i
-
c
Q)
E
16-0
a.Q)
Q)"O
o~
Q) E
gE
o 0
0.. ~
Q) ....
.c I/)
I- CU
N
..-
-
o
.... c
B .Q
0-
o CU
"OC
.... Q)
CU E
-g~
CU a.
W .~
"OQ)
0:5
~.8
Q)
....-
.cC
I-~
Q)C-
o Q)
= I/)
O.c
0.. :J
Q) I/)
.c....
::::18e
O>.Q)
cQ)in
.Q 5 ~
10 >. 00
..2Q)~
CU-o:::
a';CU_
I Eo
~ 'x <{
_eu
III a. Q)
~ g.:5
N
.... I/)
I/) .!!l c
C :J 0
0"0"0 Q) 0>:;::;
:;::;c2.c~cu
CUCUI/)- :J
:J .Q)....curo
ro 0 5-02 - > ~
a';.8Q)t::cuw-
....01/) .c
~c I/) a.~ u):!:::
:5Q)Ill~~:5~
cEo> Q)C
oQ)cQ)....o"O .
E o>.t: 0 Q) E Q) U
CUOC.c -gO
I/) C :!::: .!!1 - 0 - ~
~ cuE 5a.c~ g"
CU E Q) .-
a.cuEOl/)oQ)Q)
Q) _0Q)-.c.c
....I/)CU ....Q) -
a.cu:J"Oa.c::o
>,_co"Oo~-
:;J(j)~.ccx"Ot::
cu.,l/)cuQ)oo
~ U 'E- ~ - c .t: a.
Q)......... .c1O Q)~
....Q)~I-~Q)a._
a. 0 ..-:5 <0
_'- Q) (j) ('t) <0 0>
C ~.cU.-N c~O>
Q)Q)-U :.co..-
EI/)Q) ..-:!:::('t).........
t::o:!2cu.8~cox
CU-~~IOO>OQ)
g- I/) .... '0. 0> c - c
o=a.E-:;::;<01/)
cuco~Q)o>...
Q)ocuol"-Q);::c
00>0 _E_Q)
'5.!: >.:: 0 = ..- E
o.."O.c~"OoQ)t::
....Q)_Oc.cCU
Q) CU .... - .- :J - a.
.c O>Q) Q) !!! lv 0 .... Q)
I- ....:5(j) a.uo2o
('t)
..-
>.
-
C3 Q)
Q):5"E
.c....cu
-0"0
Q) - C
"OI/)CU
.- c.....
>000
e.-
a. 10 :2
o :J 0
_ro.c
"O>:fi
Q) Q) ....
.: Q) ~
:J 0
C-CQ)
~ .!!1.~
Q)a.o
.cEo..
_0Q)
cO.c
Q)--
Ecu-
t:::J0
cu~c
g-cu.Q
o .~ 15
Q)Q)a.
.~ I/) 00
o.cu.
o..:!:::u
Q)~-
:5'0 ~
c .-
1O:Jo
.c o.t:
I-Uo..
~
..-
t::
CU
a.
I/)
CU
c
o
:;::;
CU
:J
ro
>
Q)
.c
o
:J
I/)
Q)
"0
.s>
e
a.
'iL>
-0
c~
~C.9
t::Q)
CU.c
0.-
Q) 0
0-
Q)t::
.c 0
- a.
- Q)
2:'....
cu<O
1/)0>
1/)0>
Q)..-
o I/)
Q)-
c .-
:::'0
"0 C
o Q) 0
.~ (J ;;
Q)cQ)~
a. jg .c ro
~ Ea.- >
Q) cQ)
.s> 0 Q) C
Q) 0 E CU
....e:t:: _
0> 0 CU U ....:
.!: c g- 0 :J
E"Oo~8
8~Q)C.90
:5 .!: .~ Q) .8
....--.c
o25~-:fi
Q)o .8:J
.c-Q) c
-0:5t:::;::;
.... 0 c
o2g!1Oa.o
.- .c Q) 0
UJ..........,.....
.~ r3 _.: ()
in'O:2Q)c
:;::; c 0 :5 .~
cu'-.c 0
in Q) Q)I/) .!: Ii=
.c.... Q)
o>_.cQ)"O
c<oI-"O_
.- ~ :J .c
o~oo13c>
:g g u. .5 ~
OCOt;>oQ)
E, c:-.c
"0-
"OIOQ)Q)>.
'S en .c .: .c
o;::-:J~
.c-....c-
oot:..o2~o
m
....
Z
w
:E
%
o
<(
....
....
<(
,
""'"
,
(;,/
...
<.0 al .~ ~
Ol
(!) I .J::. ..... lL.
I.C) - al
Z Ol .9 ~ al
j:: Ol .... 1'0 .J::.
...... al I/) E -
~ >.
Z lL. ::I ro .!!! .5
W 0 C .J::.
al <t: -0
.:e I- al
.J::. iii I/)
W - -
C al C I/)
...I .- .. al -0 al
0.. .> E al .....
-0 0 -0
:E al .. al C -0
- 0 0> al 1'0
1'0 1'0 1'0
0 C E .... al
C .Q 0> 1'0 E al .0
C 0>
WU) ro C :e 0 -0 .~
>.C 0 ::I
(/)Z al.!2 ro - .0
0 I/)
00 C 0..9- C I"- al
0 0 Ol ..
0.._ E o C al I .>
01- .o,.c > <.0
Ol ..
Q;: 0 I/) alo... 1'0 Ol 0
1'0 - .J::. 1'0
9:< .J::. 1'0 al ......
..... I/)
- .J::. ~ al
U) - I/) - al I/)
C - .. lL.
W al al 0 .> al
(/) E 0 .. al =:
Z ...... t C ~ 0 =: .....
1'0 al ::I 1'0 .E
0 E .5 ....
a. t al al
0.. al E 1'0 I/) I/) 0>
0 a. 0 -0 Q)
U) 0 al -0
0 al .J::. > ::I
W al -0 - I/) ~
I/) .0
cr: 0 0 ..... .....- ~
- OlI"-
o 1'0 al
- al -0 cOl
0... al >
iL >- al -0 .- I
11. Ol I 3: 1'0 -0 <.0
al -0 -0 C Ol
< .J::. ::I .E 0 al ::I Ol
l- ... I- .0 .J::. .0 lL. ......
(/)
I
'<:J: ~ N
...... ...... I
z
o
j::
<
o
z
w
:e
:e
o
o
w
Q;:
o
o
:E
(!)
o
-
;.:
..:
~c
o
~
w
o
::i
o
D..
I ~ I/)I/)l!i
0>0 croa
-0 a.~ .Q .... .w
c-al.J::.I/)Cc
1'0 1'0 I/):!::: C alro
>-1/)-al3:[[~
:!:::aloo xOal
u~ =cal-
::Ic~2~g.~
2 0 .Q I/) v. -0 -
1'0 I/) - - .- al .0
.- al 1'0 0 I/) ..... - 1'0
Ci.....(ij C-oo_
e~0.~8-gl/)ro
o.ro~al -00
a. I/) a. ~ ~ -0 0._
1'0 I/) al .- - .J::. I/)
_~~-o()5(j)~
oalcalal.J::.Eo.
:t:Cal5=:I/)-oal
SalE-_cc:o
I/).J::.E.2o.!2roro
_ - 0 1'0 a. - .:
oalO~all/)all/)
al _ _..... .- > al
:6~.9.....ro~~-o
_ .Q ___-.E E al C5
.- - ,- al .J::.
o roOlc_lli--o
c Irol/)-oCal.
5-g~Q.ro (ij.--o:g
U 1'0 Ol 0 al -0 I/) ~ .Q
~ - >= .0, 0> lij & i:: 1il
.- -E lL. 2 ~ en lij >- g
()alcroc .J::.C-
al E .- ~ 1'0 :2 0 1'0 ~
.J::. _1/)0.0 I/)
-talalx.J::.C5roC5
_roO>Olall/)_ _
1'00.-0 C al al-o=-o
.J::.al::lro.J::.Ecalc
1-0.0.....__1'03:1'0
..:1
'<:J:
......
al
lii=:-g
€~ro
.2.J::.~
aloal
.J::. ::I.!::1
_I/):t:
tl/)O
otal
o.g 0
g-al5
I/) Ol 0
~.5 ~
~,ga::
.. ~~
o ._
ro~5
.9 .c E
al ::I E
::I E 0
.5 E ()
c 0 _
oOlii-=
o al 0 0
'5~lE~
coOo...
5 ~ al .....
U5..~lB
::1-
~- 0 C
._ 0 I/) ::I
()calo
al .Q a:: >
=::goC5
_ 1'0 0.-
~ ~"fi ffi
l-al(J)(J)
~
......
~d-.
C>
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
...I
lL.
:IE
-
a
w.(I)
U)z
00
0..._
01-
0:::0
e:<
U)
w
U)
z
o
lL.
U)
W
0:::
u..
u.
c(
I-
U)
z
o
i=
<
a
z
w
:E
:E
o
o
w
0::
o
o
:IE ....
C>
Cl
C ....
.- 0
:3....
I/)
.... -
:3 C
0.0>
.~ g
a.
"EE
0> 0
E 0
t:: .........
CI'lC/)
a.~ .....:
0> c::: CI'l
o_:g
~Eg.
.- 0> ....
LLii)a.
0> >. C/)
=(J)~
.- c:::
cc_
00>0
.- E
~ <(
:g ~U
CI'lCl'l=
C C CI'l
-CI'lCii
~ >
~I/)o
~"E~
co-
00....
.- 0> 0
oC:::c
CI'l 0> 0
I/) - .-
CI'lCl'lt::
.... 0
0>[0.
E 0> .~
CI'l I/) 0>
,e.CI'l=
..-
N
en
:2
w
-
w
0:::
i:L
(J)
~
c:::
25
<(
U Cl I"-
~"O .~ ~
0>0>"0<0
.~ :g 5 ~
.... Cl. ~ T""'
~e~>-
- 0.16 LL
t:: 0> .- 0>
o..c>..c
0.- 0.-
g-'O .Q '0
I/)cg!t::
~:8 .{g [
> ~ 0 I/)
'w ~ - CI'l
I/) 0:::: c
~ ~ 0
Cl"O I/) :.;::;
Cl C 0
CI'lCl'l2C1'l
=cCl'l=
g.Q'~ g
:3-0:3
o~....o
o ~ &u
~I/)CI'l....
~-.5 Cl.E
U _cl/) .
O>~t5-ro-ro
= CI'l ~ I/)o~
..c .- E
Cti~"Oa..D
..c :3 >. e :3
~a..Da.l/)
-
0>
Cl
"0
:3
.0
..-
NI N
"0
DE
..c 0>
~ii)
.... >.
=1/)
O>C/)
=~
'OQ::
o
g<(
:.;::;u
CI'l 0>
.2..c
CI'l-
>....
0> 0
I
0> C
.... 0
0>:';::;
Cti:m
:';::;CI'l
'c Ui
~ .~
';: .2
::::-
CI'l c
ii)~
_ c-
C 0>
0> I/)
E.D
t::ijl
CI'l ....
a.CI'l
0> 0>
0>.
0> 0>
.~ C
LL 0
N
N
:; 0>
o..c
0-
0'0
"0
.... c
~ .Q
cCti
~"E
C/) 0>
"0 E
D~
..co.
I/) E
0> .-
.c.2
~-
C/)C
~~
~g
0> I/)
.~ .0
LL :3
0> I/)
..c....
_ CI'l
.... 0>
0>'
C 0>
.Q C
_0
~~
-0>
CI'l_ .
>CI'lC/)
%.~ ~
....~Q::
-....0
CI'l a. <(
~ g-u
N
N
....
,E
E
~
Cl
e
a.
~
....
o
~
"0
C
CI'l
-
0>
Cl
"0
:3
.0
0>
..c
-
.~
....
0>
~
CI'l
E
.~
=
I/)
I/)
0>
....
"0 .
"01"-
CI'lO')
I
;:;::<0
~~
::::..-
~>-
c/)LL
('I)
N
<0
0')
0')
"O~21/)"-
C C CI'l.-....
CI'lo>"O~o
Cl E 0.._ "0
.~ E :J .Q ai
~8lijao>
~ >.0::: ~=
O"'+::....CI'l>.
-Ea.o> 1/).0
0> - I/)
.~ 0 ~ 0> "0
LL a~ ~2
0>0 c~
=_g_a.
.... 1/)'- CI'l E
0"E!!i=8
150>C/)~0>
_EO>:3.D
1/)t::....1/)
_CI'lU::c~
00. O>E
~ 0> E
'i5 0 .;:: -g t::
__>.2C1'l,E
.- C ....
g(3--oo>
:30>0>~0>
8Cti=0=
._ .... CL..,
~aoeCl'l
(3 e C 0.=
a..Q C 0
0> a.Cti 0> I/)
..cCl'l....o>
-....CI'l.De:
-0>0.1/)0>
~ = ~ CI'l.~
~ 0 a...c Cl
I/)
CI'l
('I)
N
0>
..c
-
.~
"0
0>
I/) .
I/) C
~~
"0 a.
"O~
CI'l ....
0> ~
.0>
-ro-g
:g CI'l
0._
o 0>
a.g>
.~ .E
..c
-co
Cti~
..cl"-
-0')
"00')
ai>=
ELL
E I/)
8~
0> 0>
.... E
"Ot::
'S[
o 0>
~o
::::0>
~.~
C/)LL
~
N
I
C")
I
C
~
0...
....
"00>
c-
CI'l ~
'S~
....c
CI'l 0
:.;::;
o~
-5C/)
C 0>
o .~
OLL
00')
-co
"0 0')
0>..-
~ .1/)
o>~
=u
0> 0> en
.!:::I ~ l-
I/) .... m
~o>.
0.0>('1)
ECtix
0> "0 0>
.2g-c
0> 0> 0>
:3 a:; =
.5 a. C
"EE:E
Oo~
OO~
..q
N
C- -)
0..:
C>
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
..J
0..
:IE
c
W(I)
enz
00
D.._
01-
0:::0
9::<
en
w
en
z
o
D..
en
w
rx:
u..
u..
<
I-
en
z
o
i=
<
c
z
w
:IE
:E
o
o
w
rx:
o
o
.:E
C)
O~
- ~
1Il 1Il
c: Q)
o U
'00 Q) ,
'~ ~ ~
L..J::O>
_T""
"OQ) J:: _
_L..
:g '~ ~
a.c:E
e L.. Q)
a..a a.
Q) l!? Q)
J:: en
- "0
Q)C:>-
NCO..c
~"E~
~~g
_C::J
'~ !!l "0
ll=CI)~
co "0 L..
Ul"O-g
_J::CO
c: 1Il
Q) l!? Q)
EJ::u
tl-C:
co co
a.~,s
Q)="O
O~o
0>0 0>
c: L.. c:
'~<( a
coQ)o
C:::5~
T""
M
~
::i
<(
::)
a
~
Ci:
o
>- 0<6
~ ~~g>
E '-J T"" '0
eQ)~:Uffi
a.:5 I- ..c E
o L.. E E
~.Eg*-8 '
!!l 1Il '00 Q) ~
1Il 0> ,- en .9 0>
>- ,s ~ 0 L.. T""
:t:: 16 L.. - ,Q L..
oQ)"OL..CiQ)
Q) U ffi ,g _ 15
roe"Oa.ut)
,- a. c: L.. Q) 0
L.. co ll=
g.C:-~Q)c:
L.. 0 en U _ .-
8:a:2o:a~
coOoC:c:U
_ "0 J:: 0 ,_ >-
uCOlll:PQ)U
l!?"Ol!?g...c:;:
.- c: J:: "0 _ Q)
"0 co I- co = 'S;
"B:;:~-:;:l!?
C:Q)=coc:
:J ,- co :5 0 "0
o ~:J '00 "0
o L.. 0 ~ 'S; J::
_ 1IlQ)1Il
~ co .!:: Q) L.. Q)
.- E <{:J L..
OL.. CT~:5
Q).E16l!?-x
:5Q)lIlL..roQ)
-ro&.~:5C:
CO:pot Q)
~ :5 c..2 ~ .s
T""
coil M
I
-
CI)
:!
Ul
'a
'0
.c
Ul
f
t:
..
Q)
0>
"0
:J
..c
co
0>
,
r--
0>
0>
T""
~
Q)
J::
-
0>
c:
'C
:J
"0
L..
Q)
~
co
E
.!!!
J::
-
1Il
1Il
l!?
"0
"0
co
.~
ll=
co
Ci5
T""
-.i
(/)
w
~
~
m
::i
..:
Q)
c:
c:
co
E
>-
Q)
E
:Pc:
co co
,s c::
L..
ai$
~1Il
co co
~~
"O~
5 ~
O,Q
-...J
"Or--
Q)co
Q)o>
C:T""
~ _1Il
-~
~u
l!? Q)
1;):5
.9'0
1Il Q)
~ro
,sR
c :J
o c:
Oco
T""
"lfl -.i
.!!!
:5l!?
-coO>
o c:
lIl'-
!1> Q) c:
- :J c:
COlll~
:;:1Ila.
CO'- I
Q) g> l!?
L..._ Q)
CO:t::~
1Il 1Il co
C ~:d
Q) co 1Il
E L.. co
t,gw
CO_Q)
a.C:J::
Q)CO-
0>0>
~c:
g>l!?'~
'c ro'~
c: J:: >
~-l!?
Q.Q)-
"0:;0
c: 1Il Q)
co c: 1Il
~Q):;
!;.,,'- 0
~ ~ U
,Q"OQ)
...Jc::5
~ co,S
::c(/)m
ogl3:g
ll=COL..a.
co:J"Oe
Ci5~~a.
N
-.i
I
...,.
I
Q)
....J::"O
~ - c:
c: 0> co
COc: _
E 'C t
'C -6 g
Q) Q)
c"O
.- Q) c:
_L..o
co Q).-
:5:2ro
1Il :J
Q)C:-
L.. 0 co
:J U > .
1Il Q) 1Il
c:>-'t
Q) = l!? 0
0.2c:ll=
-Q)coQ)
ll=L..-0>
cocoQ.c:
...., ~.-
1Il 1Il Q) c:
Q)_C:
-:JlIlCO
UlIlCO-
,~.!!! ~ a.
"0 0> Q) "fi
"B~~ffi
5 'OO:d c:::
0~1Il>-
o co WCO co
L.. -
ro,QQ)o
J:: - J::
...... ..... ...... g>
1Il c: - .-
_Q)oo
lIlCQ)O>
Q)COlllC:
:J E L.. 0
CTL..:JQ)
Q)Q)OJ::
c::: a. u_
N
'=t
, .. I
""':" "'"1
C)
z
i=
z
W
::E
W
...J
a..
~
c
We/)
(l)z
00
0.._
0..1-
0::0
!;!:<C
(I)
W
(I)
Z
o
a..
e/) .....
W
0:: ..
u.
u.
<C .
l-
e/)
z
o
i=
<C
C
Z
W
::E
::E
o
(.)
W
0::
(.)
o
:E
(!)
a..
C3
I'-
0>
I
co
0>
0>
~
~
Q)
:5
.....
o
t
CO
a.
III
CO
"0
Q)
III
III
~
"0
"0
CO
Q)
.0
.~
...
Q)
-
-
CO
E
.!!!
~
I-
~
..0
W
C)
<
Z
~
C
"0
C
CO
~
a.
0> CO
C ...
.t: ~
0_
:t:Q)
51-
E~
Q)-
0>'"
co.E
.5 a..
co_
~U
ro~
C I
OCOui
:PO>Q)
'OO>~
-g;:::I
Q)1.1.8
:5~Q)
Q)_O>
> C CO
o .- C
... "0 'm
a.Q)~
a. III
CO 0 c:
'0 g- g,
5 0.. lij
o III 0
U C._
_00>
~~ g
I-iila..
~
iii I ..0
'0
C
C ::I
0...,9,
'w 0 >oj
.S;..... 0
.- UJ ....
DQ)"O
U ...
0>'" CO
C ::I ~
.- 0 c
ID III 0
Q) 0>.....
C C Q)
'-.- III
0>"0 0
cc~
W::I_
.....
...~g'
C ._ ._
Q)-'"
EC.o
t~::=
['~ ~
Q)-"o
DIIlC
tCO
~.E -
... ..... III
o Q) e .
~o>Q)"O
C E Q)
U .- li=
.- 0 Q) :P
::Oo>>C
::I C 0 Q)
a.. 0 0..:2
Q)2EQ)
~'-'- ...
_Q)Q)CO
.....::10>>.
o C CO Q)
:t:::pC~
c: .- ......
.rg0~1Il
CJ)u"Oco
.~
N
..0
Q)~Q)og
>CO~-
:PC-IIlQ)
U'- 0 t > lij
co~-o~
O"O~:t:: ~
0.."0 l6 Q) 2 g>
CO Q) .0 "0 uQ) 0
"0 Q) ...
Q) Q) t III '0':5
~Q)OO'"
coca.a.a.c
t... Q) 0.,.0
Q).E ... 0.. =Eo :g
"0 "0 OQ)
C III c: "0 .- _
::IQ)coco..ro
o ~ _ CO
-::I CO III "0 C
:t::o]io~~
.rg III > Q):p'_
1Il0> a.cO>
C CO III Q) Q)
2'0"'512:2.0
.!!:! C ~ a. Q) 0
o...2Uc~-
o_Co-"O
o...!!:! ID U '0 :g
a.eiilO-c
coQ)Q)~co
oo~c>~-g
~a.c Q)cot
.- ..... .- Q) CJ) - 0
"OOIll:5 ~:t::
135c"OESQ)
c:pQ)cQ)oQ)
::I CO E CO ~ 1Il.~
O::lQ)--o>lIl
U ro > '0 C C III
> 0 C .- .- ~
ro Q) 0.. ::I .rg "0 0>
~IEo.oco>
I- ~ ._ U 0 .2 CO
N
1.0
"0
~
'5
0-
Q)
...
C
o
:P
U
CO
...
Q)
~
t
.2
o
C
E
CO
...
0>
o
...
a.
0>
C
'0
0>
C
o
C
CO
.!!!
.!!!
~
I-
~
to
U>
D::
W
3:
W
U>
Be
1Il.~
t.~
g:gai
Q)1Ilg'
Q) III ~
> Q) I
ESg'c
::I III 0 co
IIlC-a:
5Q)Q)-
u~~co
"C .~ :: d1
c~Q)C
co ~ Q) Q)
:t::cEC>
CO.!20"O
tj a.- 2
t .~ ~ g-
OO>U"O
8:2 [co
::I ~ co III
lIliilu~
o -.-
-co5jU
Q)a.EQ)
~o_~
._ (ij co -
->Q).....
5Q),b0
U"OQ)1Il
=>.O>~
Uu;COQ)
C ::I ~ C
is.Q ~-
u:t: ::I
-~~.g
co a.::I =
~~:2.E
~
cD I to
.....
Q) 0
"Ot
.2 co
ga..
'- III co
::=co~
~1Il~
t -
c. g 'ffi
.Q Q) 1.1.
III
'S; Q) .5
.- III
OQ)U
0>:50
.5.....0 ~
ID C>
Q) III Q)
C Q)
'0, E :5
coo
w~-
. is t
e_o
Q)1Ila.
E .a ~
t.rg"O
CO 1Il-
a.Q)0
Q)~~
O-Q)
1Il0.c
-c-:;;I-
gcoID
>c~
U .Q Q)
:B~CJ)
::1::1-
a..ux
III Q)
Q) .- C
~"01Il
I-co:t:
I
L()
I
Q)
~
.!!! ....
~O>'
-cco
..... ._ 0>
0"'0>
::1..-
III "0
~ U :ri'
III 0.0
~~B
~c>8
~~.5
'ffi~o>
> - C
co .-
Q)"Og
~2Q)
-cE
ro~E
~Q)o
-...U
III a.
-Q)Q)
lG.oo
::It ~
~g ~
... Q) .~
Q)o>>
~c~
t .-
:Jc"O
..... c_
" co 0
>oJ-~
o a. III
~.~ ~
C> ~:5
Q)rox
~,bQ)
I-IIlC
1_ _...0-
y~--'
(!)
z
i=
z
W
:E
W
..J
a
:E
c
w(I)
(/)z
00
a._
OJ-
0:::0
e:<
fJ)
W
(/)
Z
o
a.
(I)
W
0:::
LL.
LL
<
t-
(/)
z
o
i=
<
c
z
W
:E
:E
o
o
W
0:::
o
o
:E
C)
.!a
.s::.
-
o
-
c:
o
:;::;
co
.~
c:
:J
E
E
o
U
co
"0
c:
Q)
Vl
.~ ui
:s::t5
co .;::
- -
Vl .!a
_ "0
c: ....
Q) Q)
E-
t co
co 3=
Q..s::.
Q)-
Cl 0
.0
0>0
.E: ......
c:-
c: U
.!!1~
Q..Q)
..-
r-.:
Ii:
w
~
~
"0
c:
co Vl
-
~.g ~
ii .~ -0
.!!1"OC5_
'n; Q; Vl Vl
>-:Jt
COCO-o
Q) 3= !9 0.
~_Vl~
"5~"OVl
_Oc:-
_-COrn
O.s::.VlQ)
u(5t >.
'0...0 g X
O_Q)Q)
-co c:
Q):5"Ec:
:5 "0 Q) .-
Oc:Vl-
_CO~c:
Q) _Q.Q)
.s::.Q)....Q)E
__ 0.
oco:5..Q
-3=-Q)
c: 0 >
Q)"Oc:~
> Q) 0
'0,.5 '(ij Q;
Q)COVl-
.o'O:JCO
Q) U 3=
Vl .... Vl
aC5'6~ .
.E Q) ~ .5 c.:>
-O>:JcoO
COco-'O"'"
.s::.VlUQ)-=
~ :J .S .... C>
..-
...:1 r-.:
"0
~
'5
0-
~
c:
o
:;::;
U
co
o
c:
-E
g
Q)
0>
c:
'0
0>
c:
o
c:
CO
.!a
.!a
.s::.
~
N
f'-.
.9~~
to.
~oQ.
>Q.:J
c.:>EVl
.- "0
~Q)c:c:
_Vl 0 :5 0 CO
~3="OQ)Q)
c.:>oc:uO>,
-coc:~.s::.
Q):S::VlQ)Oj
:5COQ)"Oiilo
...... ._ c: .....
tVlUQ)_o>
ot5lB5rlBQ)
0. Q) 0>"0 .- ....
0....."" U:J
:J .- 'v o>lE -
Vl"O....c::J.2
o "0 2 '0 Vl _
-c:co:Jcoo
Q)co3="O Vl
:J ,,-_ ~ 0>"0
c:.....co C:c:
.- ~ U - .-
"E ooQ.co
o - ..QE
u<C.s::.~Q)Q)
-_CO>"O
=Q)00Q)
g .s::. .0 0>"0 ~
:J-.s::.-"O-
o.s::.:t:::~c:_
c.:>:t:::3=_coQ)
3= :J Q)
Z"_~E;i.E
C3C:~Q)Q.o
Q) .- .s::. 0._
Q)E15-~~
..cQ)..........v~.....
-> Q)Q).... 0
15og-€2~
.s::.~o:JcoQ)
~ ._ U _ 3= c:
N
r-.:
....
.E
Vl
"E
Q)
E
t
co
0.
Q)
"0
"0
Q)
-
U
~
co
Q)
.s::.
-
o
-
"0
~
....
~
~
Q)
.0
32
:J
o
.s::.
Vl
....
Q)
::::ai
co Vl
E 5
.!a 0.
.s::.Vl
~~
('I')
f'-.
I
CD
I
g>CO~ -
'c 15 lij lB
C:.s::.> E
.!!1-"O 0.
Q..EcoE..Q
ujJ:.s::.2~
~ c: .!a ~ Q)
o8o..Vl"O
~OEQ;~
_o_c:
U U CO.-
:5~~3=""
c: 0
:J Q) 0 0>-
Q..E-C:Vl
Q)tiil'6"O
.s::. co .- .... c:
-Q.><COCO
-Q)Q)O>E
oCl-=-~Q)
:s:: = "0
!9~3=~:>
Vl .- .... c: i5
_u.0~1;::
U"O -.-
~c:l3o..~
.- co 0 0. ~ .
"0 _"0 co Q)!9
13 g> Vl t5 :5 .!a
c: .- Vl Q) >
:J Vl Q) .~-
05ue$.!!1
c.:>:r:eQ.E:J
Z""O 0..9 0 t5
.- c: "0 -
c.:>co25>.E
~0>~:;::;~2
_ c: .- ~ :J Vl
_'6'E~0-Q)
CO= 0:;::; Q) 3=
~ ~ 8 gaLs
('I')
r-.:
(-(,
C)
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
..J
n.
:E
-
o
WCI)
(/)z
.~.o
Oi=
0:::0
~<C
U)
W
U)
Z
o
n.
U)
w ...
a::
LL ....
LL
<C
....
U)
z
o
i=
<C
o
Z
w
:E
:E
o
(,)
w
a::
(,)
o
:E
C)
'OQ)~
coo.....
rororo.....
l/)cE~
roo a.
.- Q) x
cro>Q)
.Q Q) !!!
l/)L-~'O
:JO C
o&~ro .
C c.(O
.- Q) a.. C>
L-'OE-C>
sffi-ea..~
a.. l/) ~ 'fij 0;
a::~Q)L-.c
Q)roo'OB
J:::.a..J:::.Q)8
.....Q)15:5
'0 :5 .0 0) B
Q)__CL-
.!:::! 0 0 :p 0
5 l/):t::~'~
:5E~
:J ro C/) Eo 'tJ
ro L- Q)
0) 0"'"
~ecric~
~ a. 'E .- EO.
o ..lo:: Q) l/)
.- L- E l/) 0
>0-eQ)0
~~ro6,Q)
o.Q)o.e.c
l/)J:::.oQ) 0.0
ro..... .....
J:::.c 'Ec
:: :: g> ro .!!!
o 0 .- 0 a.
cQ)Cii=
:J .~ C 'c ~
oeE!O)~
() a. a.. 'in '0
~
cx:i
z
o
~
<C
w
D::
(,)
w
D::
C
Z
<C
tJ)
~
D::
<C
c..
C
E!
a..
C
o
:p
ro
'E 0 .
Q)O(O
~~~
a.(9~
E Q) cri"
-J:::..o
..lo::.....O
mCo
a..~0
~ ~ .~
.....Q)Q)
.....:0-
~ E! ~
..... 'n; 0
o>~
~ ro .~
:o-gil)
._ ro L-
0'0><
C Q) Q)
:J.....C
o Q)
o a.~
~E'-
.- 0 l/)
Oo~
Q) Q) C
J:::..oQ)
....._E
ro9:E
~~8
~
cOl cx:i
t a..
o -
a. a..
.!a &..... ~
,o-ro.....
m~:5:5
-g ~ o>'~
~ <( 'E C
l/) 10 .0 .Q
32~:==0
o~~C
J:::. _.2,
l/) l/) - C
Q)- roo
L-o.....o
J:::.ol/)
..... C
Q) ~ C'-
:5 (9 .Q C
o Q) 0 .Q
.....:5~a.
'Eo:o.g
Q).....::ro
E-gL-
'0 .~ :J S
ai'Oo'O
Eaiom
ro~5~
~ <( 'E.s
.!a .~ 0 .....
> ..... C
Q)'O.....Q)
L-2cE
~cro'O
ro Q) :J C
L- l/) l/) Q)
'O~5E
<( a. a.. ro
N
ex:>
I
,.....
I
ro _
~ EO;
.....'00.0
Q)L--O
~ .{g 5 00
roC-
~~~C
ii=C/) ro
o E J:::.
......-0::]......
:t::01i)L-
roJ:::.L-Q)
(j):G'O~
Q)..cffio
rol- .c
.;:: - a..
o.Cx-
eg:oa..
o.roCQ)
o.Q)Q)J:::.
C>
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
..J
0..
::E
c...
w>'
U)en
02
0.0
oi=
0::0
e:<
U)
w
U)
z
o
0.
en
W
0:: ..,
LL
LL
<
I-
en
z
o
i=
<C
C
Z
w
:IE
::E
o
o
w
0::
(.)
o
::E
(!)
:s::
co
-
I/)
o
- 0)
~ .5: G.l
cooin..c
..ccoG.l-
0.00)
::l....0)g>
I/) G.l ::l .-
E1i;I/)~
....E"E,o
.e COc
G.l 0,-
.8=co-o
I/)...._c
G.l ~.2 co
.: Q)':= ..
I/) .... I/) G.l
~:2i:S~
;!:5~E
......c-E
G.ll/)oo
..c_-o
(j)'o c .0
..cco::l
~5:+=;1/)
G.lU~co
m -'c-5
.2 5l ::lE ::l
-0 _ 1/)...;
.5: - E - I/)
o 0 l!:!
:2ajO_G.l
52colB1:
..c :t: -0 E .-
I/) E......c I/)
-Ecol/)=-
'0 0 ~ = '0
coo.oc
::l.o_~::l
8~.8ID8
~
0)
U)
...J
o
o
::I:
o
U)
iii
0)
c
-gc
co;o::g
EoI/) ~
5~;e
-.aE
-0 I/)
.... G.l
co--
o .5: .!!:!
cooa.
,.....c..o
.....G.l....
Cl)oa.
w:;a.
>oco
UCl)'O
G.lG.l_
..c..cc
--G.l
-g2E
cogjg-
=-rom
o > >
c G.l G.l
50-0
u-....
G.l G.l
~G.l:Q
u~~rn
G.l E 8 G.l
= g 0 '0,
_0-2
CO.o-oco
..c::lC';;
I- I/) co I/)
ail
~
0)
-
c
co
....
....
~-co
o 0 ~
~E-
-....0
:ob.ec
"SG.lo
E--O
-,QI/)
o I/) G.l
I/) I/)
coco
o a. G.l
.- ....
-G.lo
co c c
.2 0'-
coG.l-rn
ij) .0 lB .~
G.lQE~
-0-=0
.2-oe~
oG.lc
c....G.l-o
.- G.l G.l
-0:2-0-0
-I/)G.lc
::lC-co
oooa.
..c o.!!!, ><
I/) I/) e G.l
c'- a.....
o..c 0
.- 0 G.l
(tj :c li> ~.
.... ~ ..c G.l
~:>~c
'w g> C C
c=oco
o::l:+=;o
o-oco;o::
- G.l 0)'-
CO..c:+=;C
..c 0 .- 0)
I- I/) E 'w
-0-
C C
co ~
o a.
ffi.Q
a:~
_ G.l
c-o
o G.l
.::....
>-::l
2"5
-0-
~~
co
~=
~ .~
....
a.c
a.o
co:+=;
G.l 0
=5
c '2
.- 0
-00
3l .5: cO
I/) -0 l!:!
l!:! G.l co
-o~1/)
~l!:!:C
-0-
.!a -0 5
....co_
2G.l1/)
(tj.o-ro
E :2 ~
I/)::la.
:c~e
1-1/) a.
N
0>
o
o
..c
o
G.l I/)
.01/)
..c :t:
--
oc-
.000
....
.....>.:5
c co.-
G.l.o(tj
E I/).~
a. ->- :t:
.Q:t:E
~u=
G.l G.l ::l
-o..c-
~.... ~
o c.-
'~o ::l
co CT
E__G.l
co ....
>-:+=; 0
cc_
co G.l
_-0-0
CO'- G.l
..cl/)c
-l!:!o
1'-
I/)c:t:
1/)0-0
l!:! c :5
in-oo
.8ffi~
G.l
1/)--
G.l Jg.!!:! .
~ c 0.2
:+=;~e16
c .- a. a.
o I/) a. E
u l!:! co ._
N
0)
G.l
-0
'S;
e
a.
-0":
c G.l
co1i;
.....E
lB .!a
E..c
G.l-
I/) G.l
'S; ~
-0....
co ::l
....a.
~.8
c I/)
::l G.l
G.l..c
::l I/)
I/) .-
.!a ~
-
I/) .-
:Cli>
-..c
~(j)
co..c
- ~
~.8
o I/)
..cco
I/)
=:5
g:+=;
::l 0
o l!:!
u'O
C")
0)
o
- rn
-g"E 0
... co 0
wo ..c
-co ~
~o-ro..c
ECI)c
::c.Q.~
3l ::> o..::c
.- CI) 0 G.l
> ~
-0 G.l1: co
co..cG.l+::
....-1/)1/)
G.l..cG.lCO
-0 0 o.W
C co
::lOG.l-o
G.l......cc
::l a._ co
I/) a. 0) co
I/) co c-
.- 0'- I/)
1/)--05
:Cl/)ro...
- G.l O)~
~.~ l!:!'c
co G.l..c 0
--ooco
=......(tJ'-
g .: 0 .e
::lG.l0.1/)
Uo = g. co
G.l l!:!
>-..c 2 co
- ~ .-
uG.l2~
~ .5: gj ffi
-E-ro-o
-G.l>c
co_G.lG.l
~~l!:!1i;
C")
0)
<( -0<(
c.. G.l c..
CI).8~CI)I/)
G.l a. G.l .-
="Ee==
-o~a.c2
c G.l G.l 0 co
co .!::: = c .a
cV 5-..c .Q l6
::lG.l:t:u:S::
~ .... ~ co G.l
.- I/) -
I/):C G.l 0)=
:c - g .5: ~
-G.lcoEa.
'Q-o"E8co
.20..c~
l!:!g8tc
co.- co.e 0
~ .8 c I/) :!Q
- - >
l!:!~ .13'0
co-ooc.o
:s:: c 0 ::l ::l
coG.l-58(1)
-EI/) G.l
I/)co __>
0) ..c co:+=;
cCO)>co
'c al :c e 1:
c.o- a.G.l
.!!:! I/) ~ a.1-
c..co;o::co-o
..c..cG.l'Qc
o c.. ..c co "E
c - I/) G.l
cottG.l:5ffiE
C:::c..g;ea:l!:!
>- G.l co -0 G.l 'S
~c>ccCT
Oo~80l!:!
oq-
0>
I
co
I
:5G.l-5~ O)....c,
_ .0 :c 0 .5: 0 c
co ~ I/) :0 .-
>0:><( I/) c:t:
oo-oc.. ~co~
0.-5 ffiCl) 0 e c co
g. I/) _ .5: ~ a..!!:! =
_..cG.l ::lG.lc..G.l
oO)ccc..~_-
.- 0 0 '"' co co
I/) ..c .- I/) ::l .... -
c-<(u...OG.l;:
o I/) ::l 0 C C 0
.- .!::: c.. .... G.l .- G.l ~
:t: - CI) in ........ -0 ,n
-OG.l ce-\Jo
c..c.8oa.::lI/)-
0_ 0 o. c
0__ G.l ~~co
..colB==l/)ua:
0) 0 .- .-
::l ~ co ~ .5: ~ G.l -
e~:OG.l1/) =lB
=ii~~1:""':'.8E
G.l-oO::lG.lc.. a.
...._ I/)Eu..l/)o
~ ~ .5: lB l!:! :t 1: ~
c - = E .- --- G.l G.l
G.l -'~ E 5- cEo
_G.l G.lCO-o
'0 c G.l 0 .... - c -ro
cO:t:o..cc..G.l....
::l I/) _ EG.l
o <( ... -0 'S: G.l co c
Uc.. wG.l:> 0 G.l
Cl)oa. c~C>
~ -.Q~~co
.- ..c -0 G.l C .- I/) ..c
UOG.l > coLJ.. 1/)0
c _ G.l ~ .., c
G.lcoco-ot::lj1uco
=C:::~G.l8;eG.lC:::
_>-G.l.oo=c>-
COcoo-coo>-co
~ 0 16 ~ .5: ~ ffi 0
oq-
0)
C,)
t!)
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
-I
0..
:E
c
WU)
U)z
00
0..._
01-
"0
e:c(
U)
w
U)
z
o
0..
U)
W
"
I.L.
u..
c(
I-
U)
z
o
i=
c(
c
z
w
:E
:E
o
o
w
"
(.,)
o
:E
t!)
Q)
.r;
.....
.....
o
I/)
c:
o
:e
"0
c:
o
o
.E:
"0
Q)
I/)
I/)
Q)
r-
"0
"0
l'll
c:
Q)
Q)' .
.0'0
>-.~
iiie
50.
.- I/)
> .-
Q)..c:
r- .....
o.r-
I/).E
~o.
r- ro
Q) E
.....
..... Q)
l'll >
E;
I/)~
:E~
~.....
It)
CJ)
.;.;
-
-c
o
~
en
...J
o
o
:r;
o
en
I/)
~~ .8g. 0
Q) c: r-~-O
Ur- Q) 0 Cl ..c:
E o'C c: en 0
:!: E ..... 0..2 J: I/)
~ 0 "0 >-.!a;:) ..c:
oc::t::>enC)
Q) rot)'O :E
..c:~- ..cQ)r-
..........I/)~:J..c:o
..... 0.'0"'" en"'"
o E ._ r- Q)
r-oti.8m.E=o
Q) r-o.'- c: ..... "0
0. "0 C u:: c: .-
OO_Q) roE
Q).....oE>->
>.........0 C:Q)~
Q)c:i..c:~roQiro
"Ot)~C:C'lr-Q)
~ ..... ..c: Q)E .E: ~"O
Q) c: ..... I/) m :J
c: Q) 0 E I/) .- U
E..coQ)oc:
Q) o...c: 0 0 Q) .-
..c: 0..... 0 a......
-; Qi .~ 13 a ~ g
C'l> :Jr-I/)
ro Q) :g I/) .E .- ~
:; Cl 0..... .!a 0
o~;og>..c:"O
o ...., .~ Q) ; ~ .....
ai-coO. 0
..... C'l ai ~ ..... .~
.?;-~Q)"Oo~e
C3 '0' c: 'S; ro '5' a.
Q) Ci 5 Q) _I/) a Q) .
..c: .- '" >. ..c: I/)
..... ..c: ro -0 ~. Q) ..... .~
..... 0 C'l '>- () ..c: Q):t::
ro c: .- ..... 0 =
..c:ro:t::eQ)r-c:O
~ 0::: E 0.:S.E 'w ~
ail
It')
CJ)
'0.8
ro~o
..c::JO
0"013
:J '" I/)
I/) ~
E ro E
r-..c: 0
o I/) r-
..... .....
o C I/)
.....roQ)
o 'C
I/) li= ro
~'E >
.- C)
1/)._ Q)
Q) I/) I/)
"0 :J
:t:: ;i...c:
r-cO
Q) Q) :J
..c:r-I/)
Ci):S'O
~t)Qi
Q) cti a;
.....Q)-
ro.....Q)
.~:t:: ..c:
"OE~
.E: E
328~
:J ..c I/)
,g ~'x
I/) Q)
_ C) I/)
'0 .E: .~ c5
C:"O:t::o
:JC:=..c:
o ro 0 0
t)ii)~1/)
<0
(J)
I
0>
I
.....
0"0
.?;- Q)C:
.- ~ I/) ro
t) r- C):J
Oc: C'l
~~'O-g:s
:: .8 rn rn 'if
o C)..c: 0 .
1/)-g~1/)0~
Q;ro>-~Q)~
..c ~ C)..... :S '0
E02..c:r-ro
Q) ro.....O.....
EQ)r-o.....:::.
..cii)..cl/):>
_ ..... ro Q)
'OI/)C:O c:
Q)"Oro.....=.....
QirnO'I/)~o
I/)Oroe .....
.....CD >lIlC:
O.....o.roroQ)
o 0 Q) _ E
Q) 'C - "0 III a.
2.....Q)c:Q)0
..... .!a ? '" .- -
.- "0 ... ...:t:: Q)
E "OQ)=>
EooC)~~
o 0"'" ro.....
..co ..c:0:S:: ~ "0 "0
ro c: c:
~lIlii)Croro
:5 Q) '0 III C)
C) 0 ..... '~"O c:
.E: ..c .~ >. c: '0
"0 "0 ..... ~':J c:
c: c: 0.= e ro
~ ro e ~ C).E:
III a...... .....
=0. C)
ro g ro 0 .E: -g
.....:J..c:Oii).....
~ 0 :t:: i3 'x ~
~t)~lIlQ)lIl
<0
(J)
(t' /.....-
1.-",./
~. j
C)
z
i=
z
w
:E
w
...J
0.
;!
o
WU')
(/)z
0.0
0.._
01--
0::0
9::<
(/)
w
rn
z
o
0.
U')
w
0::
u.
u.
<
I--
rn
z
0
i=
<
0
Z --
w
:E
:E
0
0
W
0::
0
0
:E
C)
0
u:
u.
~
I-
o
-
a..
~.....
III I-~
3l E Q) .Ql
o"O!!!~ID~
a. e: Ol - .... .-
el1l0-0......
a. .... l1l ...... 0
_~O";;mt
e:~0l1llQ)l1l
.Q I- .5 Q) >- a.
.!!!_~~....... III
.~ ~ = 0 l1l
oEo..Q)-1Il
l1l .oLOe:
Ol....e: 0
e:OlOe:"O:.;::#
'C 0 .- 0 Q) 0
Q) .... - 'in - Q)
Q) a.. ~ '5O III '0'
e: 0 .- Q) ....
'0, g> a. 0 g. a.
e: 'C III Ol Q) Q)
W.8e:e:....o
.- l1l .- Q) e:
.....e:o.=Q)~l1lcj
e: Q)-E
Q)~IIle:Q)""O
E 0 ~'0,:2 0 ~
t IE .- e: > 't: C>
~!!!~we~Q)
Q)I-~Q)o.~;;
0_-;;;::00
1Ill1l'Q _3:::JIIl-
.lIl::::J ....
....e:Q)Q)IIlQ)Ol
oe:_~t"Oe:
~l1ll1la>0::Jt:
III "0 Ol:!::-O
0~0.0Q)00.
= ::J I- .5 Q)
.oQ)o 0.._....
::J ::J .- a.. = -
0..:s'8[t1-3:~
Q) e: 'C a.. "0 "0 e:
~8~cffiffiffi
T'"
o
T'"
e: ....
00-
.in...... l1l
.- III ::J
.~ e: e:
O.Q ffi
Ol t5 III
c: .~:!:::
.~ e......
Q)0.0
.5 Q) ffi
g>go.
Wl1l1ll
Q) E l1l
~.... -
-.ga>
-Q)Q)
o o.~
~ Cf)
:.amI
- Q)
'u >- III
e:.......l1l
::Jo~
0_0
ULO::J
,?;- IIlcj
.- Q) ul 0
u-ga>~
~13~"
- .5 in Q)
iil.9"'ffi;;
;; Q) 'C 0
Q)-
~~tOl
1Il:.;::#l1le:
Q) e: .-
::Joot
0- 0 'n;' 8-
Q)OEQ)
0::_ ....
~I
T'"
ci
T'"
a:~
"'ffi Cf)m_
Q)1Il E Q)OlQ)
~ -~ ~ .... ~ Q) ::J
= _ ,...-:!2- 0 Ol - .... Ol
o _ c3 U ...... .5 ~ III ~
5 ~ Q) Q) .!:: g, ~ l1l
OE~~Q)e:3:>-e:
U - - ;; 0 >- 't: Cf)l1l
Oe:LO -l1l
>. - :E m g>.5 3l s "0
"0 ....Q) ~ m .- 0 .2 Q)
::J ~T'"iil213tlll
C/)-"E:> -0l1l l1l0
o ........- a. Ol a. a.
III C\l "0.- e: 0
Ol e: 'E e: .0._ -....
.5 .- Q) Q) .- t ~ - a.
0,?;-Ee:tOl1l09Q)
e:=~:J~0.~;-,:;~
l1l .- ~ -, m :> """ -
e:oo .......>-IIl-
.- l1l Qj e: T'" Qj .- ~
LJ..:: > 0 ..~"O ~ Ol
LO-Q) -0_e:::::::J
C\l .a "0 e: Z 0 l1l'- e
T'" ...... .Q l1l E ~
lQ)o~e:o..nE-
0::: ;; III :g .Q - C\l 0 III
Cf)o-gl1l'5ID"7U'E
E......Q)e:o::JO:: Q)
'C e: - III e: Cf) ~ E
Q)"O .Q):.;::# Oe:
-e: Q)Q) e: l1l 0:: e: Ol III Ol
_ 0 Q) 0 e: .- =
e::.;::#...."Oo:.a~l1l
Q)Q)l1lc(Q):!::....c(Q) .
;;;;Se:a.l1ll1l -t5
0l1l0_OlIll::JQ)
Ol"O .!:: - "0 Cf) Q) e: 0 .~
e:Q)00..l1l ....Q)....e
a.~ - - _ . III ~ "'ffi a.
o e: ::J !!! 'u t .~ .- :.;::# ~
"0 OlO Q) e: 8-~U e: 0
l1l8;ge:::J0.~L02e:
e: Q) ::J ,~ R ::J 0 C\l 0;2
_ .....0"""""" 1Ill1lT'" a......
C\l
ci
T'"
......
o
-
e:
Q)
E
a.
o
Qj
>
Q)
"0
....
S
III
e:
l1l
c.~
t=
o 0
0.J!!
0.>-
::J l1l
III 3:
>>=
-0
Q)-
>
:.;::#
o
l1l
....
o
>-
l1l
'u 3:
e: Q)
::J Q)
o ....
u......
LO
,?;-C\l
60::
Q)Cf)
;;'5
-......
l1l Q)
~;;
C\l
o
T'"
Q)
.0
';: .!!!
1Il~
20
l1l e:
"Ol1l
g-o::
LJ..~
50
xQ)
~;;
....
~s
-a.
_ l1l
~ E
e"'ffi
o.e:
o.li=
l1l_
c( .~
0........
Cf)Q)
......~
0-
Q)
5 0
Em
"0.0 .
e: "0
8-g~
l1l'3 e
IIlc-l5::
c(~l1l
T'"
T'"
T'"
.:.i
<C
o
(/)
u:
"0
....
'l1l
~"O
Q)oe:
~~:.;::# .s
"Ol1l-o.lIlcn
ffilllQ)E......Q)
1Il:;::JOiil
g>~IIl~e:"O
=Q)e: l1l 00.
'to e: Q) .... 'in ::J
-"0 0 Q)::JLJ..
1Ile:-~135
Q) l1l ul (5 .5
iil3:m"OQ)~
::JQ)Q)e:~-
0-'- >- l1l - ......
Q)~01ll00
"O....::o!_......~
l1l_~:g_0
iil goo Q)e: Q)l1l
~"O-
-e:Q),?;-Ee:
~ 8 5 ~ .~ .;;;
i1l.8~J!!g.5
e: Q) .-
Q)"O~ul....t5
= ~ Q) 5 l1l .~
g '5O III :.;::# Q) e
::J0u.l6'00.
o 5. -0 .~o .2 ~
U ....01:::
,?;- ~ Q) 0..5 :>>
.- l1l ~ ...... "0 e
UIIl::OSOl
Q)Q)0>-0....
~eQ)~~l1l
....=s......I-CJ)Q)
-0l1l::J1Il~
l1l III "0 0 .- Q)
~ ~ g-~~J;
::1
T'"
T'"
T'"
I
o
~
I
~
"7n
r \_u'"
APPENDICIES TO THE
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S
1995 ANNUAL REPORT
(APRIL 1996)
,#-
'. Attachment C
~C~ D\'X A
D'-- "
, ~ 0:1 F: r, ~.
DATE:
December 14, 1995
FROM:
Growth Management Oversight Commission
Richard Emerson, Chief of pOlice~
Pol ice Department Response statistics for FY
1994-95
TO:
SUBJECT:
INTRODUCTION
The Police Department is responsible for reporting two Quality-of-
Life Threshold Standards to the GMOC. Each of these Threshold
Standards includes two statistics:
* proportion of Priority I & II calls for service (CFS)
responded to within seven (7) minutes; and,
* average response time
GMOC Threshold Standards. The first threshold measure is for
Priority One (PI) CFS. PI CFS include felony crimes in progress
and known injury to persons or property. The threshold standards
for PI CFS are:
--
* 84% of all PI CFS responded to within 7 minutes (7:00);
and,
* average response time for all PI CFS of four minutes and
thirty seconds (4:30)
The second threshold measure is for Priority Two (P2) CFS. P2 CFS
include misdemeanor crimes in progress, possibility of injury to
persons or property, and emergency public services (i.e., traffic
signal out). The threshold standards for P2 CFS are:
* 62% of all Priority II CFS responded to within 7:00; and,
* average response time for all P2 CFS of 7:00
GMOC Threshold Data for FY 1994-95
Calls for Service Decline. During the current review period the
Police Department responded to 73,482 calls for service (CFS).
This represents a decrease of 1,275 CFS over FY 1992-93 and
translates into a decrease in CFS volume of 1.2% for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1995. The Police Department met or exceeded
three of the four Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards established
by the GMOC for police services.
- r
/
--
Performance: Priority 1 Calls for Service. . During the current
review period, the police Department met one of the two threshold
standards established for PI CFS.
* 84.9% of PI CFS were responded to within 7:00
* the average response time for all PI CFS was 4.37, seven
(7) seconds above the threshold standard
Priori ty 1 CFS Performance Remains Stable Over the Last Two
Reporting Periods.
* In FY 1992-93, the Police Department reported that 84.2%
of PI CFS were responded to within 7:00 and that the
average PI response time was 4:44.
* In FY 1993-94, the Police Department reported that 85.4%
of PI CFS were responded to within 7:00 and that the
average PI response time was 4.35.
Performance: Priority 2 Calls for Service. During the current
review period, the Police Department met both of the threshold
standards established for P2 CFS:
*
63.4% of all Priority II CFS were responded to within
7:00; and,
--
* the average response time for all P2 CFS period was 6.39
on-Going Efforts to Reduce police Response Times
As reported last year, the Police Department has made proactive
policing a priority. Our approach has been that it is more
effective to prevent crime before it occurs than to respond to
calls for service. The stability in maintaining Priority I
response times coupled with the improvement in Priority II response
time points toward the positive changes made during the last
several years. An additional benefit is that crime is going down.
Chula vista currently enjoys a decreasing crime rate as do other
cities in our region. Of note is that our decrease surpasses the
other agencies in the region. crime statistics January 1 - June
30, 1995 indicate a violent crime decrease of 10%. Property crime
during this time reflects a 13% decrease with auto theft showing a
34% decrease.
statewide crime was down 7% for the same period. Our decreases
parallel the statewide trend; however, exceed the expectations in
significant areas. Auto theft statewide was down 8% compared with
our 34% decrease. Programs implemented over the past several years
have attributed to the decrease and have enabled compliance in the
threshold response categories with trends showing stability in the ~
response times.
~-,
,-
In FY 1995-96, staff and the City Council have taken further action
designed to further enhance officer effectiveness. Building on
last year's successes, the Police Overhire Program continues to
enable the department to staff the Uniform Patrol Division at a
level that more closely approximates full staffing. Volunteer
programs were also expanded to currently include a Senior Volunteer
Patrol Program (SVPP). Seventy-five volunteers provide a variety
of supplementary pUblic safety and community services like vacation
house checks, parking enforcement and license enforcement. The
Chamber of Commerce adopted this program and provides significant
financial support to the program. The CAST Program with its 68
volunteers has now responded to in excess of 500 call outs, freeing
up the patrol officers so that they are available to respond to
priority calls.
Staff has also completed the planning process for PS 115, the
Public Safety Communications Project. The RFP currently has two
successful bidders reviewing the dollar costs associated with this
program. Staff is currently exploring financing options associated
with this project.
Based upon these new programs, staff expects that response time
data will continue to improve and that the Police Department will
comply with all GMOC Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards during the
next reporting period.
The response data continues to improve with stability in response
times supporting deployment strategies currently in place. The
decrease in crime is a continuing validation of program selection
and deployment tactics. The Police Department and City
Administration will continue to develop funding strategies to
enable purchase of a CAD system during FY 1995-96.
cc: John Goss
Sid Morris
Ed Batchelder
--
I if
'-'"'
~.
~0JO\~ 0
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
December 18, 1995
FROM:
Growth Management -Oversight Commission
( ('tv/'
John D. Goss, City Manager<;. ~
X 'I'
James B. Hardiman, Fire Chief ~'J II-
Fire Department Response Data: Fiscal Year 1994-95
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
This report serves to update the Commission on the performance of the Fire Department in
responding to various emergencies in Chula Vista for the period July 1, 1994 to June 30, 1995.
Emergency call volume for this period (6,480) increased by 9% over the previous fiscal year
(5,923).
Threshold Compliance Findings
The current Fire Threshold Standard requires that 85% of all emergency fire and medical calls
for service be responded to within seven minutes. For Fiscal Year 1994/95, the data collected
indicates that the Chula Vista Fire Department responded to 82% of the emergency calls within
7 minutes (7:00); 85% of the calls were responded to within 7 minutes :16 seconds.
As in the previous year, this apparent non-compliance continues to result from statistical
inconsistencies in the manner in which the present automated system records total call
response time. When capturing data for a call, the current system includes Call Intake Time,
in addition to the components originally included in the establishment of the Standard: Dispatch,
Turnout, and Travel times. The resulting effect on threshold performance measurement is that
available data now includes time factors \Nhich were not included when the current threshold
standard was established in 1987. The present standard allocates a flat 30 seconds for call
dispatch, not the actual time for call intake and dispatch, as is now recorded. This could be
adding 20 to 60 seconds to overall response times per call, and causing the statistical non-
compliance indicated above.
--
Although Fiscal Year 94-95 data indicates statistical non-compliance, the performance level is
consistent with that reported for Fiscal Year 93-94 (80% of the emergency responses were
within 7 minutes). The Turnout and Travel time elements of the overall response time
measurement also remain statistically consistent, indicating a sustained level of service to the
community.
Chula Vista Fire Department
December 18, 1995
Page 2.
~.
Proposed Remedial Actions
It is suggested, as in previous discussions, that the installation of the Computer-Aided Dispatch
system will offer significant assistance in collecting accurate times and streamlining the call
intake and dispatch process, thereby providing a system to better measure performance and
compliance.
CAD System Acquisition Status:
The CAD System Project Team which includes representatives from the Police, Fire,
Management Information Systems, and Public Works departments, has received and
evaluated all proposals from vendors, and has narrowed the list to two vendors which
have made hands-on presentations of their systems to the City. Currently, the Team is
in the process of requesting additional pricing and equipment information from both of the
vendors in an effort to tighten the bottom-line as much as possible and to aid in direct
comparison of the proposals. It is anticipated that the data will be available for selection
of a vendor in February, 1996.
Additionally, Staff is also in the process of identifying possible funding sources for the
CAD system purchase, installation and implementation. The estimate of system costs
at this point may be on the order of $2.5 million, representing a most critical step when
one considers the scarcity of funding of this magnitude.
......,
Response to Prior Year GMOC Recommendations
In its report to the City Council for 1994, the Commission recommended that the Fire Station
Master Plan be updated. An exhaustive master plan update project will be undertaken for a
number of departments possibly 3 to 5 years from now. For Fire Department planning, however,
the urgency exists to do an interim update of the Fire Station Master Plan immediately. This
stems from the need to locate the permanent Fire Station #6 (Interim Station #6 is located in the
Eastlake Business Park area.) The Fire Department will be working with the Planning
Department on development timeline projections so interim revisions to the current Fire Station
Master Plan may be made.
As a note of interest, the current Fire Station Master Plan includes the relocation of Fire Station
#4 from its current location near Southwestern College, to the Fire Training Tower site at East
'H' and Paseo Ranchero in the Rancho del Rey project. In the Spring of 1995, negotiations
were completed with McMillin and an agreement was reached which provides for McMillin
depositing with the City, on February 1, 1998, the cost of constructing a 4,000 square-foot, 2-
bay fire station, including all fixtures and furnishings. It is anticipated that the construction of
this facility will begin in late 1997/early 1998. -.
Chula Vista Fire Department
December 18, 1995
Page 3.
Recommendations
It is recommended that the Fire Department continue with its present course of action, including:
~ Coordination with Finance and Police Departments for purchase of CAD system;
~ Coordination with the Planning Department in making interim revisions to the Fire Station
Master Plan.
Should you have any questions on this or other Fire Department issues, I can be reached at
691-5055.
c-
Chula Vista Fire Department
P\QV~fJV\'{ G
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
Growth Management Oversight Commission Meeting of Feb. 1, 1996
Andy Hamilton 694.8965
GENERAL
1. 1995 Air Quality
. Federal: 10 transport + 2 local days over standard = 12
. State: 53 transport + 43 local days over standard = 96
. 3 Health Advisory Days (15 pphm)
. Chula Vista monitoring station: No federal exceedances; 6 state exceedances
2. Compliance Activity in Chula Vista
FEDERAL ISSUES
3. 1994 State Implementation Plan (federal)
. Nearing approval by EP A
. Shows region will attain standard by 1999
4. Possible triggers for new (tighter) State Implementation Plan (SIP):
New ozone standard (due in 1997)
New particulate standard (due in January 1997)
New vehicle emission data show cars pollute more than previously thought
STATE ISSUES
5. RAQS Triennial Update (summary paragraph on pg. 4)
6. Ridesharing
. State employer ridesharing requirement killed - SB 437
. State A VR standard still alive but not feeling well
. Congressional elimination of Clean Air Act ridesharing requirements for severe,
extreme areas
7. Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credit (MERC) Rule
8. Vehicle Indexing Program rejected
9. Indirect Source Program
. Board did not pursue rule requiring District review of major public developments
. Technical assistance on amending General Plans to reduce bias against walking,
biking, and transit.
to. AB 2766 Vehicle Registration Funding Program:
1995 Projects
City of Oceanside
Ecology Auto Wrecking
City of Oceanside
MTDB
Agri Service
Transit Corridor StudylRezoning
Vehicle scrapping
Traffic Signal Coordination System
Leverage CNG bus purchase
Reduction of Compost Hauling
$150,200
$1,980,000
$48,633
$765,000
$25,000
7a
~
DRAFT
-
City of Solana Beach
County of San Diego
Neutronics
UC San Diego
Multi-Use Pathway
Guaranteed Ride Home Program
Retrofit of older vehicles
Sorrento Valley Shuttles
$54.000
$38,492
$617.500
$275,400
· RFP for next allocation (2-year allocation. $3 million): Out in April or May
REGIONAL ISSUES
11. Border Vehicle Program
· AB2008 (1993) requires foreign commuters to register vehicles in California
· Legislation allowing vehicle impoundment for failure to register .alli1 presumption of
commuting if holding a work visa.
· Working with Mexican officials on a public information campaign in Tijuana
· Rep. Bilbray filed a bill to fund a study of vehicle emissions from border vehicles.
-
-.
c
,-
(
t
~
~
~~
All PtiIllIll1..II11t:r
COUlTY OF IAI OIEBO
Air Pollution Control Board
Greg Cox District I
Dianne Jacob DIStrict 2
Pam Slater District 3
Ron Roberts District 4
Bill Horn District 5
Air Pollution Control Officer
R. J. Sommerville
UNHEALTHFUL AIR DAYS
UP SLIGHTLY IN 1995
Contact Bob Goggin
(619) 694-3332
Smog levels exceeded the state clean air standard on 96 days in 1995, compared to
79 days of unhealthful air recorded ~ 1994, according to data released by the San Diego
County Air Pollution Control District.
Federal standards were exceeded on 12 days compared to 9 days in 1994.
"The inaease in the number of days with unhealthful air in 1995 is just a slight
variation in the overall picture of air quality that has significantly improved since 1989,"
said Ron Roberts, chairman of the Air Pollution Control Board.
"However, any inaease in days with unhealthful air is of concern, and our goal is
to get that number to zero," Roberts added.
The year 1994 was an abnormal year when meteorology played a significant role in
reducing smog levels. Heavy rainstorms in the fall and the decline of El Nino reduced
the potential for smog formation. El Nino is a condition when warmer water
temperatures in the Pacific Ocean affect weather patterns.
In 1995, the region had more swmy weather and only one fall rainstorm until
mid-December aeating the climate for more smog. Smog is formed from the chemical
reactions of hydrocarbon and oxide of nitrogen emissions in the presence of sunlight.
A similar situation happened in 1988 when the number of days exceeding state
standards inaeased by 32 days to 160 exceedences, compared to 127 days in 1987.
Motor vehicles account for more than 60 percent of San Diego's smog-forming
emissions. The introduction of a cleaner-buming gasoline in California in March 1996
will reduce smog-forming emissions from cars by 15 percent compared to 1994 gasoline.
-more-
9150 Chesapeake Drive · San Diego · California 92123-1096. (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 · Smoking Vehicle Hotline 1-800-28-SMOKE
g~:
@ Pri.nrcJ 0t1 K.:(~,-jc-J. IJ.lprr
APCD 1995 AIR QUALITY SCORECARD
2-2-2
..-..
Implemention of the current regional air quality strategy is expected to result in
meeting federal air quality standards for locally-generated smog by 1999.
An analysis of San Diego's air pollution showed that smog transported from Los
Angeles was the key factor in 10 of the 12 days when air quality violated federal standards.
Of the 96 days when state standards were exceeded, 53 days (55 percent) were primarily
caused by transport from Los Angeles and 41 days (45 percent) were locally-generated
pollution.
Clean air standards are set by the state and federal governments to provide an
adequate margin of safety in protecting public health. California's standards are stricter
than those used nationwide.
u"
The state ozone standard is 9 parts per hundred million (pphm) or 75 on the
Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). The federal ozone standard is 12 pphm or 100 PSI.
Three health advisory episodes were issued in the county in 1995 - one day each in ..-..
Alpine, Escondido and Otay Mesa. When smog levels reach 15 pphm (138 PSI), a health
advisory is issued and the community is advised to reduce vigorous outdoor activity.
San Diego has not had a Stage 1 smog episode since 1991. A Stage 1 episode occurs
when smog levels reach 20 pphm or 200 PSt
Additionally, this was the fifth straight year that San Diego County did not exceed
the state standard for carbon monOxide. State standards were also met for nitrogen
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead but not for ozone (smog) or inhalable particulates.
With the exception of ozone (smog), San Diego met federal air quality standards
for all other criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide,
inhalable particulates, and lead.
###
96-1 (1/18/96)
..-..
)iJ
...
u
'C
...
en
is
'0
-Cob
cs
G)(.)
"c
1-0
c:n;3
O~
E~
U).'=.
-ct
f!~
G)C
"'C~
G)O
u.(.)
o
m
CI)
.-
Q
C
ftI
(J)
,-
~
Ii
~,
12-
Ii
(/)5
1!(/)
~j
u...2
~~
Ql'
l~
uS
~-
U) 8
"IiGJ
~~
&~
e! 0
~.~
~:!
~I
~~
='""
"i tf
!~
o~
.8-
E
::J
Z
II ..... 0 0 ..... 0 0 CJ) ..... ..... N ~ 0 0
..... .....
..-
i 0 0 0 0 0 0 CJ) 0 0 c.. ~ ,.... 0
..-
II 0 ~ C") ..... C") ..... 0 ~ 0 ~ ..... C") 0
..... ..- .....
..-
I ..... ~ C") co co ~ ~ ~ C") CJ) co ..... 0
..... ..- .....
...
i ,.... C") ,.... ,.... co C") C") ~ ~ ~ co CJ) .....
..... .....
..-
Ii co ~ CJ) co C") C") ~ co ,.... PI C"') ~ .....
..... .....
..-
I CJ) co co CJ) CJ) ,.... ~ an IR ~ . ~
..... .....
...
I ~ ,.... CJ) ,.... ,.... ~ ~ co !€I C"') ~ ~
.....
...
Ii ..... .... ..... co an N ~ N ~ ~ ~ .....
..... .....
...
I N 0 C") N ,.... N ~ C") . N ~ 0
..... ..... .....
..-
i an an N N ~ ~ ~ CJ) 1ft ~ ~. ~
..... ..... ..... ..... .....
...
i C") CJ) co ..... CJ) ~ ~ C") ... CJ) ~ ~
..... ..... 1ft .....
...
it an . . co CJ) CD ~ C") U; ~ ~ ~
..... .....
..-
III N ,.... . ~ ..... an pj N Ci co ~ ~
..... ..... ..... .....
...
.....
S ..... an CJ) C"') C") C"') &J ~ ~ ~ ~ N
..... ..... ..... .....
...
I .~ '2.5
~! ~ j
C CD :8 I ~ j
c: J - ! S~ e I
c'3 ('CJ :::E ! ~
~ :::E 1 enc aft
c: ~ ~ .m ,~ ! Ii>>
! j <5 ~ ~ .....
w I w 0- CD
If)Q 0)
I ~ b5
~i
QU)
~
I
~
!
....
!
...
~
I
~ ~I
1;) 'E-
c If
o (1)1
.. Gl(l)
- ji-
-c a ~!
cu .s~
~ C f'
1-.2 ~
mij ~ ~
o 0 en ~
tJ)E~~1
C GlO
CD ~ ~o
1; C ~i
ens 121
~ ~
.~ t :&
Q gQ.
C !
as ..
U) 15 Q.
Ie
z
81 ('II) ll) ..- C\I a) CD r::: ...... CD . s:1 fa (:) ('II)
..- ..- ..- ..-
....
Ii (:) C\I ~ (:) C\I ~ ~ ..- 0) ~ ..- ~ (:) ..-
..- ..- ~
....
it ll) ...... C) CD ll) C\I Fe (:3 (:) 8 ~ ..- (:) ll)
..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ll)
....
S! a) C\I co t() ll) ~ ..- E\J CD t;; ro ~ (:) CD
..- ..- ..- ..- cc ..-
....
.... B
s: (:3 ('II) tle E\J t() ('II) r::: l; tle ~ ~ ..- CD
..- ..- ....
....
11 le ~ (:3 le 8J l\i ~ ~ ~ JI 18 fB ..-
..- ..- ....
....
I ~ l\i ~ ~ ..- l\i ~ ~ m ~ &!I C\I
('II) ..- ..-
....
I 0) ~ ~ ~ (It ...... ~ s:1 S ~ Fe C\I
..-
..- ..- ....
i a) 0) ~ ~ ~ ll) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..-
..- ..- ..- ..-
....
I C\I l; s:1 C\I E\J ~ ~ IS l; ~ ~ (:)
..- ..- ..-
..-
S (:3 ~ ~ s:1 ~ tle ~ ~ :: m ~ ~
..- ..- ..-
i ...... ~ s:1 ro ~ co 8 S . Je ~ ~
..- ..-
..- ..- ..-
it ll) s ~ ~ ..- m 1Q ~ fB
..- , , ..- ~
..- ..- ..-
.
Ii a) ~ , r; 8J (:3 ~ ~ fa IS .s ~
..- ..-
.... ~ s: ..-
. ll) ~ IS ~ ~ l\i ro 0; (:) C\I
..- ..- .... ..- I
..-
.. ~ 1!i I
j 1&1 i w
i5 j ~ ?:-
11 c I ... i ~ ! I 1:: I
~ i I cn~ ~ !
f i ~ i ~ >- ~l ..-
m 8 ~ CD t
w I
I Eel :t:
..-.
~
J
oW
~
~
-
}
-..,
.J
i
-
.Ii
I
f
f
I
..-.
..J
,-
AIR Pl.l.m0N CONTID. DIJRICT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
December 1995
New Rule 11
Board revises permit exemptions
The Air Pollution Control
Board has adopted a revised
permit exemption rule to benefit
small business. The new rule
adds several types of equipment
and operations emitting small
amounts of air contaminants to
the list of equipment exempt from
having air permits unless the
operation or equipment consti-
tutes a public nuisance.
The new Rule 11 includes
recommendations made by the
County of San Diego Economic
Advisory Board's Sunset Com-
mission to update the rule, clarify
inconsistencies and make it easier
to understand.
In addition, District staff
added several new exemptions,
clarified the rule's intent and
reformatted its structure to make
it easier for businesses to use.
Some of the added exemp-
tions include ink cartridge filling
operations, small coffee roasting
equipment, aerosol can crushing
equipment, fire extinguishing
equipment, nail salon operations
and golf grip application stations
using high boiling point materials.
Sources that use less than 30
gallons per day of materials
containing 20 grams per liter or
less of volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs) are also exempt.
The rule also has a new
provision exempting equipment
that complies with the District's
planned new equipment registra-
tion program. Eligible equipment
includes emergency generator
engines, certain types of portable
equipment and previously ex-
empt stationary internal combus-
tion engines with a rating of less
than 500 brake horse power (bhp)
installed before April 1983.
Another new provision in
Rule 11 provides flexibility for
unique or small operations with
low emissions to obtain an ex-
emption from permit require-
ments for equipment not listed in
the rule on a case-by-case basis.
The revisions eliminate ex-
emptions for some boilers, steam
generators, gas turbines and
internal combustion engines, all
sources of nitrogen dioxide (NOx)
emissions. These changes were
made to conform with District
rules recently adopted to meet the
requirements of federal Clean Air
Act.
The new rule incorporates all
of the Sunset Commission's first
phase recommendations and
some of the second phase recom-
mendations.
The rest of the commission's
second phase recommendations
are being reviewed and will be
ready for public comment in mid-
1996.
More cash for old clunkers...
Another program to
scrap more old cars has
been approved. Owners
may call (619) 595-5285
for more information.
(See story page 2.)
Last year's program
crushed 1,000 clunkers
which cut an estimated
128.5 tons of smog-
forming emissions from
the region over a three-
year period.
.
Board funds 10 projects
from vehicle registration fee
A program to scrap more than
3700 gross polluting vehicles
during a three-year period was
approved by the Air Pollution
Control Board.
The program was among ten
projects allocated $6.7 million
from the Vehicle Registration
Fund, established through Assem-
bly Bill 2766 to implement and
fund programs to reduce motor
vehicle emissions. The projects
are estimated to reduce 950 tons
of smog-forming pollutants.
The Board designated
$1,980,000 to Ecology Auto
Wrecking for the accelerated
retirement of old vehicles. Under
the program, owners may receive
$600 for cars up to 1974 and $500
for 1975 to 1981 models.
"The goal is to get the worst
polluters off the road," said Dianne
Jacob, chairwoman of the Board.
"That's why we'll pay more for
older cars whose pollution con-
trol devices are not as advanced."
In order to qualify for the
program, cars must be registered
in the county for the past two
years and have a title free of any
liens. Vehicles with a non-operat-
ing registration are not eligible.
The car must be fully functional
and must pass a functional
driving test that includes turning
off the engine and starting it
again. The car must also have all
its basic parts intact.
Owners may call (619) 595-
5285 for program information
and to be put on a waiting list.
Vehicle purchases are expected to
start by January 1.
Another $617,500 was
awarded to Neutronics, Inc., to
retrofit 1,200 older vehicles (1975-
80) during the next three years
with advanced catalytic emission
control systems.
I
- I
Photo courtesy of Coronado Journal
Ed HlIsdon, Nancy White and Don Kilner disembark one of Coronado's new
compressed natural gas shuttles.
The Board also allocated
$765,000 to the Metropolitan
Transit Development Board
(MTDB) to help purchase 30
clean-fuel buses powered by
compressed natural gas (CNG).
The University of California
San Diego (UCSD) received
$275,400 to establish two connec-
tor shuttle services to the Coaster
commute train.
The City of Oceanside was
awarded $150,200 to fund a
Transit Corridor Study and de-
velop zoning changes; $48,633 to
fund a staff member to develop
and assure the calibration and
efficient start-up of Oceanside's
traffic signal coordination system;
and another $25,000 to assist
employers in implementing a
telecommuting program.
The Board allocated $25,000 to
reduce emissions from heavy duty
trucks that pick up and haul green
.-.
wastes.
The City of Solana Beach was
awarded $54,000 towards the
development of a multi-use
pathway for bicyclists and pedes-
trians.
The Board designated $38,492
to expand the existing San Diego
County Transit System Guaran-
teed Ride Home Program to
include the North County Transit
District's Coaster commute train
passengers.
The Air Pollution Control
District received $2,041,603 to
offset District costs related to
motor vehicles ($725,245) and air
monitoring costs related to motor
vehicle emissions ($1,316,358). An
additional $523,200 was allocated
for public information programs.
Four programs sponsored by
the Transportation Management __
Associations were allocated
funding for Employee Transporta-
tion Coordinator training
($26,778), Commuter Classified
($55,512), vanpooling ($47,975)
and telecommuting ($74,023).
~
Commuter survey shows
~ more driving alone
,-
The most comprehensive
survey and analysis of commuters
in San Diego County was recently
completed. A total of 2400 persons
were interviewed by telephone
with a minimum of 300 in six
geographic areas to provide
specific data by travel corridors.
The study found that drive
alone rates are creeping up,
especially during the past two
years. Drive alone rates average
about 75%.
The average commute time in
San Diego County increased
significantly during the 1980's (up
30%), more than any other metro-
politan area. However, the average
commute is less than 20 minutes.
The study compiled a profile
of current carpoolers revealing
that, for most, the match occurs at
work; 42% through an informal
work contact. Only a few carpools
II formll in the neighborhood.
The study showed that 69% of
carpools have two people who
work at the same employer site,
43% commute with another
household member, and 70% ride
with just one other person. And
61 % have been in the same
carpool for more than a year.
Current carpoolers were shown
to be the most pro-environmental
group.
The study showed that a
substantial opportunity exists
regionwide for carpooling; 51 % of
commuters are carpool candi-
dates. The largest potential
carpoolers hold manager / profes-
sional positions (42%), followed
by clerical (13%), military (6%),
and students (7%). More than
half are 25-45 years old (55%).
The study revealed that most
potential carpoolers want help in
finding riders (56%) and more
information on options. The
survey showed a need for market-
ing materials, customized
matchlists by employer or busi-
ness cluster, and information on
incentives and other rideshare
programs that work.
The prime motivators for
carpooling were the guaranteed
or emergency ride home (44%),
lower insurance rates (54%) and
gas discounts or cash (43%).
The survey also reflected
community concern about the
environment and traffic conges-
tion and how it affects the
region's quality of life.
About half of those surveyed
did not think air quality had
improved despite significant
improvements in air quality
during the past few years.
The study was conducted
during early 1995 by Illium
Associates, Inc., for the City of
San Diego under a grant from the
Air Pollution Control District.
Board drops
smog indexing
pi lot program
A proposed pilot program that
would have created a "smog
indexll number and required
annual smog checks for high
polluting vehicles in the county
has been dropped. The Air
Pollution Control Board decided
not to implement the program
after evaluation indicated that it
would be costly and provide little
benefit to air quality.
The program, established by
Senate Bill 2050, was initially
supported by the Board as ~
possible alternative to state
employer trip reduction require-
ments. However, Senate Bill 437
was recently passed by the state
legislature and signed by the
Governor rescinding mandated
state employer trip reduction
requirements in San Diego.
Consequently, Board implementa-
tion of the pilot study is no longer
necessary as an alternative.
Tim Sturdavant, left, of Rohr Industries was recently recognized for his efforts in
developing the aerospace air toxics regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency
in Washington D.C. With him is Mary D. Nichols, EPA's assistant administrator for
Air and Radiation.
Locally, Sturdavant was also a key person in the formation of the Pennit Stream-
lining Committee, a District/Industry task force. He recently received the Director's
Award from the District. Sturdavant is leaving San Diego to work in Utah.
Co
Board approves border task force recommendations
---..
The Air Pollution Control
Board has approved the recom-
mendations of the Border Vehicle
Task Force to move ahead with a
public information program and
explore changes to state and
federal law to reduce emissions
from Mexican vehicles commut-
ing to work in California.
California law requires that
Mexican-plated vehicles used to
commute to work in the state
must be registered in California
and subject to smog checks.
After reviewing several
options, the task force concluded
that there is no current practical
means for enforcing the law.
Smog-forming emissions from
all vehicles crossing the border
from Mexico have been estimated
at 13 percent of the vehicle emis-
sions in the San Diego region.
However, commute vehicles are
only a portion of the 13 percent.
The task force recommended
the following:
· Conduct a public informa-
tion campaign aimed at Tijuana
vehicle owners and U. S. employ-
ers to publicize the registration
requirement and emphasize the
benefits of clean air to both sides
of the border.
· Meet with Mexican gov-
ernment officials and the Tijuana
business community to examine
alternatives to reducing emissions
from vehicles crossing the border.
· Work with the Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Immigration and Naturaliza-
tion Service (INS), U. S. Customs,
the Department of Justice and
local and state agencies to reduce
border emissions.
· Pursue legislation to allo",
law enforcement officers to im-
pound Mexican-plated commute
vehicles. Current law requires at
least two citations to be issued
before impounding.
Important Numbers
Permit & General Information
(619) 694-3307
Air Quality Forecast Message
(619) 565-6626
Smoking Vehicle Reporting
1-800-28-SMOKE
Citizen Complaints
(619) 694-3340
Small Business Assistance
(619) 694-2288
Public Information
(619) 694-3332
Air Pollution Control District
County of San Diego
9150 Chesapeake Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
Air Pollution Control Board
Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman
Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman
Greg Cox
Pam Slater
Bill Horn
PRINTW ON RECYCLED PAPER
BULK RATE
U. S. POSTAGE
PAID
SAN DIEGO, CALIF
PERMIT NO. 571
......
'I ,-,~
1991 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY STRATEGY
TRIENNIAL UPDATE FOR
THE SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN
DECEMBER 1995
SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
9150 CHESAPEAKE DRIVE
SAN DIEGO CA 92123
/
..-"
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
INTRODUCTION 1
Table 1 - Documents In Which Required Triennial Progress
Report Information is Provided 2
DATA UPDATED SINCE 1991 RAQS 2
Growth Factors 3
Emission Factors 3
CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION
Control Technology Requirements 3
Control Measure Adoption Status 4
Table 2 - Revised RAQS Control Measure Adoption!
AJnendr.nentSchedule 5
Table 3 - District Rules Adopted or Amended in 1994 not .-.
Scheduled in the 1991 RAQS 9
NONREGULA TORY TRANSPORT A TION CONTROL
MEASURES STATUS 10
CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IN MEETING INTERIM
MEASURES OF PROGRESS 11
.
~
'"1
TRIENNIAL UPDATE OF THE
1991 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY STRATEGY
FOR THE SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN
INTRODUCTION
The California Clean Air Act (state Act) requires local air pollution control agencies to prepare air
quality strategies to attain state air quality standards, to annually and triennially report on progress
m~de t~ implement those strategies, and to triennially revise the strategies as necessary. This first
Tnenrual Update addresses the status of San Diego County A..r Pollution Control District (District)
efforts through 1994 to implement the 1991 Revised Regional Air Quality Strategy (1991 RAQS),
adopted by the Air Pollution Control Board (Board) on June 30, 1992, and revises the RAQS
control measure adoption schedule accordingly. The Triennial Update was prepared according to
Air Resources Board (ARB) guidance. Because 1994 is included in the triennial reporting period,
the Triennial Update also satisfies requirements for the 1994 annual progress report.
The state Act requires the RAQS to provide for a minimum interim progress of five percent annual
emission reductions for nonattainment pollutants. If the five percent annual reductions are not
achievable, the RAQS must include an expeditious schedule for adopting every feasible control
measure. Since' five percent annual reductions are not achievable in San Diego, the required
measure of progress is the expeditious adoption of every feasible control measure.
While the state Act established requirements for areas not attaining the state ambient air quality
standards for ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide, San Diego is
designated attainment for state nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide standards.
Therefore, this Triennial Update to the 1991 RAQS only addresses state ozone nonattainment
requirements.
In addition to state Act requirements, nonattainrnent areas are subject to requirements of the federal
Clean Air Act (federal Act). Some of those requirements satisfy state Act requirements. One
requirement was to submit a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision in 1994 demonstrating the
federal ozone standard can be attained by 1999. The federal Act also required the 1994 SIP
revision to include an updated 1990 emissions inventory, future projected emissions, and control
measure emission reductions for 1996 and 1999 to satisfy emission reduction progress
requirements. Since the state Act requires such infonnation be in the Triennial Update, the ARB is
accepting these applicable portions of the 1994 SIP revision as fulfilling state requirements. This
Triennial Update incorporates the 1994 SIP revision by reference rather than including it with the
Update.
Another requirement of the Triennial Update is to show monitored air quality improvements in peak
concentrations and population exposure. The ARB suidance allows the ARB "Air Quality
Indicators" report presenting that infonnation to satisfy this requirement. Consequently, this
document is also incorporated by reference to prevent duplication. The report indicates air quality
in San Diego has improved significantly since 1981. Measured peak daily ozone concentrations at
Escondido improved by 22 percent, while Alpine and downtown San Diego both improved by
14 percent. Measured regional population-weighted ozone exposure improved by 69%.
Table 1 lists detailed state Act triennial progress reporting requirements and the corresponding
documents satisfying those requirements. Changes in growth projections and emission factors
),
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 2
since the 1991 RAQS adoption are addressed next. This is followed by sections addressing control
measure implementation, transportation control measures status, and interim measures of progress.
--.
TABLE 1
Documents In Which Required Triennial Progress Report Information Is Provided
Proeress Reportine Requirement PrQlress Report Document Reference
Emission reductions and growth projected for the 1994 SIP:
future [Health and Safety Code ~40924(b)] and 1990 Base Year Emissions Inventory (page 9),
incorporate new data and projection~ [~40925(a)] Attainment Demonstration, Table 4 (page 29),
Rate-of-Progress Plan, Tables 1-4 (pp. 33-36)
Modeled air quality improvement [~40924(b)] and 1994 SIP: Attainment Demonstration
progress toward attainment of the state ambient air (page 20, last paragraph)
quality standards [~40924(c)]
Monitored air quality improvement {~40924(b)] and ARB Air Ou~lity Indicators Report
progress toward attainment of the state ambient air
quality standards [~40924(c)]
Contrast updated data to assumptions in 1991 This 1994 Triennial U.pd.ate
Strategy [~40924(b)]
Status of adopting District rules scheduled for This 1994 Triennial U.pd.ate
adoption in 1994 [~40924(a)]
Status of implementing TCMs [~40924(a)] This 1994 Triennial U.pd.ate
Correct deficiencies in meeting interim measures of This 1994 Triennial U.pd.ate
progress [~40925(a)]
-.
DATA UPDATED SINCE 1991 RAQS
Two key factors affect emissions inventory and future projected emissions: growth factors and
emission factors. These data have been revised since the 1991 RAQS was adopted and are
incorporated in the 1994 federal SIP revision. With this Triennial Update, the 1999 emission
reduction projections in the federal SIP replace the year 2000 projections in the 1991 RAQS.
One exception is electric utility boilers. Controlling these boilers was not necessary to meet federal
SIP requirements, and consequently was not reflected in the SIP. However, control of the boilers is
necessary to meet state mandates. District Rule 69 was adopted implementing the control measure
in the 1991 RAQS for these boilers. Consequently, this Update assumes NOx emissions required
in Rule 69 (annual NOx emission limits of 2,100 tons in 1997, and 800 tons in 2(01) rather than
emissions projected in the federal SIP.
Detailed comparison of the effects on projected emission reductions of changes to both growth and
emission factors is not presented because the 1991 RAQS and federal SIP use different planning
horizons, intervening statistical years, and growth and emission factors. The state Act requires a
comprehensive RAQS update in 1997. A more detailed analysis will be provided considering the
combined effects of changes to growth and emission factors at that time.
--.
")
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 3
Growth Factors
The 1991 RAQS emissions projections were based on San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG) pre-recession Series 7 growth forecasts, with rapid growth predicted in population,
employment and vehicle travel through the 1990's, continuing the boom of the 1980's. The
recession, however, considerably changed those expectations. Reduced employment opportunities
associated with the recession slowed migratory population growth. This caused vehicle travel to
level off. As the recession ends, growth, and corresponding vehicle travel, are expected to increase,
but at a slower pace than the 1980' s.
SANDAG Series 8 forecasts, used for future emissions projections in the 1994 federal SIP
revision, account for the recession. While the Series 7 forecast predicted 80 million vehicle miles
traveled daily in 2000, Series 8 forecasts 70 million.
Because the 1991 RAQS overestimated growth, emissions reductions relative to the 1987 base year
were underestimated. For instance, daily on-road motor vehicle. emissions of reacti ve organic gases
(ROO) were projected in the 1991 RAQS to decrease from about 160 tons in 1987 to about 80 tons
in 2000 (50% reduction). Had the 1991 RAQS not overestimated growth in vehicle miles traveled,
projected daily ROG emissions in 2000 would have been close to 70 tons (56% reduction). Similar
results apply to emission reduction projections for power plants and other stationary sources.
Electrical generation growth factors have also been revised, but reflect regulatory reform rather than
the recession. The San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) revised the 50% increase in
locally generated electricity it previously projected by year 2000 for the 1991 RAQS to a no growth
assumption. This reflects the uncertainty of deregulation proposed by the California Public
Utilities Commission. The 1994 federal SIP reflects the Soy&E no growth assumption.
Emission Factors
The 1991 RAQS relied on an earlier version of the ARB's on-road motor vehicle emissions model
(EMFAC 7E). The model has since been updated (EMFAC 7F). The 1994 federal SIP revision
reflects the most recent version. For comparison, using the earlier version, 1990 daily on-road
vehicle emissions were 111 tons of ROG, 126 tons of oxides of nitrogen (NO x) and 881 tons of
carbon monoxide (CO). Using the updated version, 1990 daily on-road vehicle emissions are 197
tons of ROG (77% increase), 173 tons of NOx (37% increase) and 1,409 tons of CO (60%
increase).
CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTA nON
Control Technology Requirements
,.-.
Health and Safety Code Section 40914(b)(2) requires the 1991 RAQS include every feasible
control measure and an etpeditious adoption schedule. The intent is that control measures be
adopted on an expeditious schedule for every source category in the District that can be feasibly
controlled. Consequently, the measure of progress is whether every feasible control measure is
being adopted expeditiously.
In addition, Health and Safety Code Section 40919(c) specifies the level of control for all existing
stationary sources as Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT). Section 40406
defines BARCT as the emission limit based on the maximum degree of reduction achievable,
considering environmental, energy, and economic impacts.
.~J
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 4
The level of control constituting BARCf is determined for each source category when adopting
rules. The ARB, in consultation with districts, issues statewide BARCf determinations for certain ........,
source categories. BARCT must be at least as stringent as Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RAen, as required by the federal Act. The federal Environmental Protection Agency
(EP A) defines RACf as the lowest emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting
by the application of control technology that is reasonably available considering technological and
economic feasibility. In some cases, a rule adopted to meet federal RACf requirements may need
to be further tightened to meet more stringent BARCf requirements.
Control Measure Adoption Status
The 1991 RAQS, as amended March 2, 1993 to reflect ARB comments, contains 1n expeditious
schedule for adopting every feasible control measure. Adoptil.g a control measure usually involves
adopting or amending a District rule. Control measures can propose adopting new rules controlling
previously uncontrolled sources, or propose amending rules to increase the control stringency for
regulated categories. However, in some cases, a control measure may be implemented without
adopting a rule.
Table 2 summarizes the status of District efforts to adopt or amend rules to implement control
measures scheduled in the 1991 RAQS. Of the 22 control measures scheduled for adoption by
1994,9 (41 %) were adopted in 1994 and 1 (4.5%) was adopted in 1995. Additionally, one control
measure scheduled for 1995 was adopted in 1994. Eight (36%) of the control measures are
rescheduled for adoption in 1996 or 1997,3 (14%) are being deleted from the adoption schedule,
and 1 (4.5%) is being moved to unscheduled status.
-..
~
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 5
TABLE 2
Revised RAQS Control Measure Adoption/Amendment Schedule
RAQS Revised
Rule Scheduled Actual Scheduled
Number Control Measure Title Pollutant Adoption! Adoption! Adoption!
Amendment Amendment Amendment
Year Date Date
20.1- Revised New Source Review All 1992 Amended
20.4, 60 5/17/94
67.4 Further Control of c.an ROG 1994 Amended
Coating 7/25/95
67.4 FurtherControlof~ ROG 1994 Deleted
Coating
67.6 Further Control of Solvent ROG 1994 Deleted
Qeaning
67.11 FurtherControlofVVood ROG 1994 Amend
Products Coating 1996-1997
67.12 Epoxy Resin Operations ROG 1994 Deleted
67.13 Underground Storage Tank ROG 1993 1996-1997
Decommissioning and Soil
Decontamination
67.18 Further Control of Marine ROG 1993 Amended
Coating 12/13/94
67.19 Coatings and Printing Inks ROG 1992 6f7 /94
Manufacturing
67.20 Automotive Refinishing ROG 1993 1996
67.21 Adhesives Operations ROG 1993 1996-1997
67.22 Foam Blowing and Plastics ROG 1993 6f7 /94
Expanding
67.23 Plastic, Rubber, Composite, ROG 1993 1996-1997
and Glass Coating
67.24 Bakery Ovens ROG 1993 6f7 /94
69 Electrical Generating Steam NOx 1992 1/18/94
Boilers
69.2 Industrial and Commercial NOx 1993 9/27/94
Boilers
[i
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 6
TABLE 2 (continued)
Revised RAQS Control Measure Adoption/Amendment Schedule
-
RAQS Revised
Rule Scheduled ActUal Scheduled
Number Control Measure Title Pollutant Adoption! Adoption! Adoption!
Amendment Amendment Amendment
Year Date Date
69.31 Stationary Combustion NOx 1994 9/27/94
Turbines
69.42 Stationary Internal NOx 1995 9/27/94
Combustion Engines
Residential Low-NOx Water NOx 1994 1996-1997
Heaters
Residential Low-NOx NOx 1994 1996-1997
Furnaces
13013 Trip Reduction Program for All 1992 1/18/94 Deleted
Employers with 100 or More
Employees
Student Trip Reduction All 1993 Unscheduled
Program
Indirect Source Program All 1994 1996
-
lRule 69.3 meets federal Reasonably Available Control Technology requirements, and may be tightened in 1996 or
1997 if necessary to meet state Best Available Retrofit Control Technology requirements.
2Rule 69.4 meets federal Reasonably Available Control Technology requirements, and may be tightened in 1996 or
1997 if necessary to meet state Best Available Retrofit Control Technology requirements.
3Rule 1301 became inoperative upon federal ozone reclassification, and the state mandate has been eliminated.
Consequently, the control measure is being deleted from the RAQS.
-
~
,;{
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 7
In the 1991 RAQS, emission limits for both can and coil coating operations (Rule 67.4) were
proposed to be made more stringent. The subsequent ARB BARCT determination for these
operations indicated the existing District rule already satisfied requirements for BARCT and the all
feasible measures requirement. However, because the affected industry requested tighter emission
limits for un coating operations, reflecting technology already implemented, the un coating
emission limits in Rule 67.4 were reduced in 1995. Since no further control is required for WI
coating, the proposed additional control for &Qil coating is being deleted from the RAQS adoption
schedule.
Similarly, emission limits for solvent cleaning operations (Rule 67.6), and polyester and epoxy
resin operations (Rule 67.12) were proposed to be made more stringent. Subsequent ARB BARCT
determinations for these categories also indicated existing District rules already satisfied
requirements for BARCT and all feasible measures. Consequently, the additional controls for these
categories are being deleted from the RAQS adoption schedule.
The need for and appropriateness of developing a rule controlling underground storage tank
decommissioning and soil decontamination (proposed Rule 67.13) will be reevaluated during the
1995-97 planning cycle. These operations are currently controlled by District permit requirements.
If a rule is appropriate, adoption will be scheduled for 1996 or 1997.
The control measures for wood products coatings (Rule 67.11) and automotive refinishing
(proposed Rule 67.20) are being delayed to 1996 or 1997 because of technological limitations. For
wood product coatings, the current rule reflects existing technology. As technology advancements
emerge, control levels reflected in the 1991 RAQS will be reevaluated and, if appropriate, rule
amendments would be proposed. For automotive refinishing, the rule proposed for adoption in
1996 reflects currently available technology. The ARB BARCT determination is being
reconsidered because it includes technology forcing measures that are proving infeasible. As
control technology develops and the BARCT determination is reconsidered, emission limits in the
proposed rule will be reevaluated and may be amended if necessary.
The BARCT determination for adhesive operations (proposed Rule 67.21) is nearing completion.
This control measure is being delayed while awaiting the BARCT detennination.
The control measure for plastic, rubber, composite, and glass coating operations (proposed
Rule 67.23) is being delayed to 1996 or 1997 to allow focusing rule development efforts on
federally mandated rule revisions, control measures with more emission reduction potential, and
completion of a Socioeconomic Impact Assessment required by state law.
The rules adopted for stationary combustion turbines (Rule 69.3) and stationary internal
combustion engines (Rule 69.4) were designed to meet federal requirements for Reasonably
A vailable Control Technology (RACT) for oxides of nitrogen (NOx). These rules may be
tightened in 1996 or 1997 if necessary to meet BARer requirements. To avoid federal sanctions,
Rule 69.4 was adopted in 1994, despite being scheduled in the 1991 RAQS for adoption in 1995.
Federal sanctions would mandate increased requirements on industry and jeopardize federal
highway funding.
The control measure for residentiallow-NOx water heaters was based on emission limits already
achieved by South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) regulations. Because the
South Coast AQMD subsequently proposed further emission reductions, adoption of this control
measure is being delayed awaiting the outcome of South Coast AQMD efforts.
The need for residentiallow-NOx furnaces will be reevaluated during the 1995-97 planning cycle.
This control measure was included in the 1991 RAQS because San Diego was nonattainment for
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 8
the state nitrogen dioxide standard. This standard is usually violated during winter months, when
furnaces are used. San Diego is now designated attainment for nitrogen dioxide. However, some
exceedances of the state ozone standard occur during winter months, and NOx is also an ozone
precursor. Therefore, if a rule is appropriate, adoption will be scheduled for 1996 or 1997.
The employer based trip reduction program (Rule 1301) has become inoperative pursuant to a
sunset clause included in the rule. The rule focused on federal Clean Air Act requirements for
Severe ozone non attainment areas. The requirements were eliminated when the federal
Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) reclassified San Diego from Severe to Serious. In
addition, state requirements for employer based trip reduction programs have been eliminated by
Senate Bill 437 (Stats. 1995, Ch. 607). Consequently. this control measure is being deleted from
the RAQS.
~
The student trip reduction program is unscheduled because necessary ARB guidance is not
available. ARB was required pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 40919(d) to revise
guidance on calculating transportation performance standards. The need for a student trip reduction
program depends upon how transportation performance standards are calculated. ARB had also
announced it would develop guidance specific to student trip reduction programs.
To implement an indirect source program pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 40918(d),
the District was directed by the Board in June 1994 to develop a strategy for reviewing major public
projects and collaborate with the cities and the County to support local indirect source program
development. In. response. the District is recommending development of indirect source guidelines
and the provision of technical assistance to local governments.
Table 3 summarizes rules adopted or amended in 1994 that were not reflected in the 1991 RAQS.
Most of the rules in Table 3 were adopted or amended to meet federal requirements. However.
Rule 27 - Banking of Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits, and related amendments to
Rule 21 - Permit Conditions. were adopted following an industry request for greater flexibility in
meeting New Source Review (NSR) emission offset permitting requirements.
-
-
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 9
TABLE 3
District Rules Adopted or Amended in 1994
Not Scheduled in the 1991 RAQS
Actual
Rule Adoption!
Number Control Measure Title Pollutant Amendment
Date
20.9- Federally Enforceable New Source Review All 5/17/94
20.10
21 Permit Conditions All Amended
11/29/94
27 Banking of Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits All 11/29/94
67.3 Coating of Metal Parts and Products ROG Amended
11/1/94
67.4 Metal Container, Closure and Coil Coating Operations ROG Amended
9/27/94
67.10 Kelp Processing and Bio-Polymer Manufacturing ROG Amended
Operations 6/15/94 .
67.16 Graphic Arts Operations ROG Amended
9/20/94
68 Fuel Burning Equipment NOx Amended
9/20/94
1401. .. Title V Federally Enforceable Operating Permits All 1/18/94
1425
12 rules
While most of the rule amendments in Table 3 will have negligible emission reduction effects,
Rule 67.10 - Kelp Processing and Bio-Polymer Manufacturing Operations is an exception. The
amendment to Rule 67.10, adopted in 1994 to meet federal RACT requirements, provided
significant additional emission reductions not reflected in the 1991 RAQS. When the 1991 RAQS
was developed, kelp processing emissions were thought to be much lower than now known, and the
need for the further controls was not recognized.
It should be noted that the amendment to Rule 67.4 listed in Table 3 differs from the amendment to
Rule 67.4 listed in Table 2. The amendment listed in Table 3 was primarily due to federal technical
requirements, while the amendment listed in Table 2 was scheduled in the 1991 RAQS and
provided further emission reductions.
Health and Safety Code Section 40913(b) requires the Board to make a finding that each update to
the RAQS is a cost-effective strategy to achieve attainment of the state standards by the earliest
practicable date. The Board made such a finding when adopting the 1991 RAQS, which included
an assessment of the cost-effectiveness of proposed control measures and a list ranking the control
measures by cost-effectiveness, pursuant to Section 40922(a). The Triennial Update does not
propose adding any new control measures to the RAQS. Thus, the cost-effectiveness analysis in
.I l
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 10
the 1991 RAQS still applies. Since all feasible control measures are still scheduled to be adopted
as expeditiously as is now considered practicable, the Board can find that the Triennial Update of
the RAQS is still a cost-effective strategy to achieve attainment of the state standards by the earliest
practicable date.
~
NONREGULATORY TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MEASURES STATUS
The 1991 RAQS included six nonregulatory transportation control measures (TCMs): Transit
Improvements, Vanpools, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOY) Lanes, Park and Ride Facilities, Bicycle
Facilities, and Traffic Signal Improvements. The TCMs reflect commitments to continue existing
implementation efforts as specified in the Regional Transportatio'l Plan (RTP).
According to the 1994 RTP and the 1994-2001 Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP), the following improvements are programmed for completion by 2001 with identified
funding sources. Consequently, the commitments in the 1991 RAQS to these TCMs are being met.
Transit Improvements: Trolley service to Santee and commuter rail service from Oceanside to
downtown San Diego have recently begun. Trolley extensions to Old Town and Mission Valley
are under construction. A trolley extension to University City, commuter rail service from
Oceanside to Escondido, new express bus services, and several new transit centers are programmed.
Additionally, the Board allocated funding in the 1993-94 Vehicle Registration Funding Allocation
Plan to pr:ovide about 50% of the local match to a federal grant for the Metropolitan Transit
Development Board to purchase 83 new low-emission compressed natural gas (CNG) buses to
replace higher emitting older diesel buses. The 1994-95 Vehicle Registration Funding Allocation
Plan again provided 50% of the local match for the purchase of an additional 30 CNG buses. Over
100 additionallow-emission replacement buses are programmed through 2001. _
Vanpools: Implementing the vanpool program was contingent upon additional funding. The Board
allocated funding in the 1993-94 and 1994-95 Vehicle Registration Funding Allocation Plans to
jointly fund an incentive program with the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) to
encourage van pooling. Currently, 10 CNG vans and 22 gasoline powered vans are operated in that
program. UCSD also operates 25 vans. Due to these efforts, new vanpools continue to be fonned.
HOY Lanes: HOV Lanes are programmed for construction along 1-5 from 1-805 to Manchester
A venue by the end of the decade. The next highest priorities are to continue the 1-5 HOY lanes to
Oceanside, and to continue the current I-IS HOV lanes to Escondido.
Park and Ride Facilities: The commitment in the 1991 RAQS was to continue to promote existing
park and ride facilities to improve use. This is being done through continuing efforts by Caltrans to
collocate some services at park and ride facilities, and by the regional ridesharing program,
Commuter Computer.
Bicycle Facilities: 402 miles of additional bikeways are programmed, averaging over 50 miles of
additional bikeways per year. The commitment in the 1991 RAQS was to add at least 25 miles per
year.
Traffic Siinal Improvements: 42 signal retiming and interconnection projects are programmed
through 1995. The RTP indicates signal interconnection should focus on the regional arterial
system.
.-.,
Triennial Update of San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 11
CORRECTION OF DEFICIENCIES IN MEETING INTERIM MEASURES OF
PROGRESS
California Health and Safety Code Section 41503.3 mandates that the ARB require the District
adopt contingency measures when the minimum rate of progress has not been achieved, unless the
District demonstrates that the discrepancy will be corrected and the deficiency restored during the
next reporting period (Le. 1995-1997). The interim measure of progress for San Diego is
expeditious implementation of every feasible control measure.
As indicated previously, the District has determined some control measures in the 1991 RAQS to
be unnecessary and has deleted those measures from the rule adoption schedule. Because existing
rules implement BAReT for the affected source categories, the measures can be deleted. The
removal of unnecessaI'7' control "neasures from the adoption schedule does not constitute a
deficiency because the "every feasible measure" requirement remains fulfilled.
As indicated previously in Table 2, control measures not adopted in 1994 and still considered
necessary have been rescheduled for adoption in the 1995-97 reporting period. Unless determined
not feasible or unnecessary, all unadopted control measures scheduled for adoption by 1997 will be
adopted during the 1995-1997 planning cycle. Because no required control measures are being
delayed beyond the next planning cycle, contingency measures implementation is IlQt required.
_.
t\Q
Iv
I~
~,).-...>
-
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
, I
Regional air quality continued
to improve in 1994 while significant
changes in the regulatory environment
avoided several million dollars in un-
needed costs to local businesses.
Last year was the sixth straight year that the
air in San Diego County was cleaner. Federal
clean air standards were exceeded on only
9 days and modeling by District staff demon-
strated that the county can meet the federal
standard by 1999. These improvements clearly
demonstrate that education, voluntary compli-
ance and sensible regulations are effective in
reducing emissions.
A major victory was achieved in 1994 when
the federal Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) reclassified- San Diego's non-attainment
classification for ozone (photochemical smog)
from severe to serious. Reclassification elimi-
nated the requirement for a federal employer
trip reduction program and significantly reduced
the number of businesses required to obtain
costly federal operating permits.
We were also able to convince EPA to
exempt small sources of emissions from Title V
permitting requirements of the Clean Air Act
saving businesses about $14 million. The
business community was a strong partner in
persuading EPA to take these actions.
The Air District continued to work closely
with industry to streamline the permit process to
make it more user-friendly and reduce staff
review time and costs but still meet state and
federal air quality requirements. Forms have
been simplified and computerized and the
evaluation process speeded up. Also in 1994,
the District established a Total Quality Manage-
ment Program (TQM) to assist employees in
focusing on continuous quality improvement
and better customers relations.
.-.",
The Air Pollution Control Board
also established a sunset review com-
mission last year to review regulations and
procedures to reduce complexity and regula-
tory burdens on business. Many of the recom-
mendations-including updating and eliminating
outdated regulations and reducing permit
renewal fees-will be implemented in 1995.
Later this year, the Board will consider a new
fee structure to fund a portion of the cost for the
District's air monitoring system from vehicle
registration fees which makes more sense since
more than 60 percent of the smog emissions in
the region are from motor vehicles.
Vehicle registration funds were used to
fund several projects that reduced automobile
emissions including the purchase and scrapping
of 1,000 older more-polluting cars and the
purchase of cleaner natural gas buses.
The Board will continue to fight onerous
federal and state regulations and create a user-
friendly climate for business and the economy,
while continuing to achieve a clean air environ-
ment.
Every person can help by reducing their
personal contribution to our smog problem.
Combine car trips and rideshare once a week.
About 70 percent of the pollution happens just
starting your car when the catalytic converter is
cold and doesn't operate efficiently. If the car
sits for more than an hour, the cold start process
begins again. By making small changes, each
of us can contribute to making our environment
more livable.
.-.",
~
.-.",
Dianne Jacob
Chairwoman, Air Pollution Control Board
-2-
1994 Annual RepQtl
Ai r Qual ity
in San Diego County
The mission of the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District is
"to protect the public from the harmful effects of air pollution, achieve and
maintain air quality standards, foster community involvement, and develop
and implement cost-effective programs meeting state and federal mandates,
considering environmental and economic impacts. "
In accomplishing its mission, the District designs and implements
strategies to meet federal and state mandates and bring about the emission
reductions necessary to achieve and maintain federal and state clean air
standards. Air quality is continuously monitored in the San Diego Air Basin -
which covers the 4,225 square miles of San Diego County - for smog (ozone),
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and inhalable particles.
But solving our air quality problems cannot be done by government alone.
Each one of us is part of the solution. It's up to us as individuals to each do our
part to preserve one of our greatest resources of all- our air!
San Diego County
Air Pollution Control Board
, Table of Contents
Bill Horn
District 5
Air Quality in 1994...........................................4
Accomplishments in 1994 ................................ 7
The Clean Air Acts ......................................... 10
Emission Sources ............................................ II
San Diego's Smog Problem ............................ 12
Smog Trends................................................... 13
About the District ........................................... 14
Citizen Participation ....................................... 15
Ambient Air Quality Standards ...................... 16
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms .................... 17
Pollutant Standards Index ............................... 18
10 Ways to Clear the Air ................................ 19
Greg Cox
District 1
Dianne Jacob
District 2
Pam Slater
District 3
Ron Roberts
District 4
-3-
~ Air Pollution Control District
..-.
Air Quality in 1994
The year 1994 had only half as many days
when San Diego County exceeded the state clean
air standard as occurred five years ago.
In 1994, San Diego exceeded the state standard
for ozone (photochemical smog) on 79 days com-
pared to 158 in 1989. Federal standards were
exceeded on 9 days compared to 55 days in 1989.
Only one of nine monitoring stations, the
mountain slopes station at Alpine, exceeded the
federal air quality standard for ozone (smog) in
1994. This was the first time that just a single
station has exceeded federal standards since air
quality monitoring began in 1955.
Air quality standards are set by the state and
federal governments to provide an adequate margin
of safety in protecting public health. California's
standards are stricter than those used nationwide.
The state standard for smog, measured as
ozone, is 9 parts per hundred million (pphm) or
s
(0
)
75 on the Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). The
federal standard for smog is 12 pphm or 100 PSI.
Only one Health Advisory episode was issued
last year. A Health Advisory is issued when smog
levels reach 138 PSI and the community is advised
to reduce vigorous outdoor activity.
San Diego has not had a Stage I smog episode
since 1991. A Stage 1 occurs when smog levels
reach 20 pphm or 200 PSI.
This was the fourth straight year that San Diego
County did not exceed the state air quality standard
for carbon monoxide. State standards were also
met for nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead;
but not for ozone or inhalable particulates.
San Diego met federal air quality standards for
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, ..-.
and lead. The only federal standard still to be met
is ozone. The region is unclassified for inhalable
particulates.
mo~ zone
Number of Days Number of Hours Number of Days Number of Hours
Exceeding Exceeding Exceeding Exceeding Maximum 1.Hour
Station Federal Standard Federal Standard State Standard State Standard Concentration Date of Maximum
1.Hour 1.Hour 1-Hour . 1-Hour in pphm Concentration
Concentration Concentration Cencentration Concentration
> 12 pphm > 12 pphm > 9 pphm > 9 pphm
Alpine 9 16 71 229 15 June 23
Chula Vista 0 0 4 4 10 Sept. 9
Del Mar 0 0 4 7 11 Sept. 25
Downtown SD 0 0 0 0 9 Nov. 1
EI Cajon 0 0 11 24 11 May 29
Escondido 0 0 10 37 12 Sept. 25
Kearny Mesa 0 0 2 5 10 Sept. 25
Oceanside 0 0 2 4 11 Sept. 25
-.
Otay Mesa 0 0 9 11 12 June 24
BASINWIDE 9 16 79 267 15 June 23
-4-
Smog (Ozone)
Ozone, commonly called
smog. continues to be San
Diego's primary air pollution
problem. It is formed from the
chemical reactions of hydrocar-
bons and oxides of nitrogen in
the presence of sunlight. Motor
vehicles account for 64 per cent
of San Diego's smog-forming
emissions (see page 11 ).
Short-term exposure to smog
for an hour or two can add stress
to the body. It is a strong irritant
that can cause constriction of the
airways, forcing the respiratory
system to work harder in order to
provide oxygen.
Chronic exposure to smog
irreversibly reduces lung capac-
ity, lowers stamina, and leaves
people more vulnerable to long-
term respiratory problems.
Smog is especially harmful for
children. senior citizens, and
those who suffer from heart or
lung disease.
Carbon Monoxide
.-,
Carbon monoxide is an
odorless. colorless gas formed
when fuels are burned. It is
harmful when inhaled because it
restricts the blood's ability to
carry oxygen to the body's tissues.
About 85 per cent of carbon
monoxide comes from auto tail-
pipe emissions with the highest
concentrations found in areas
with congested or high volumes
of traffic. It reaches peak levels
during the winter months.
There were no violations of
the state or federal carbon
monoxide standards in 1994.
1994 Annual Report ~
Nitrogen Dioxide
The brown haze seen in the
San Diego skyline on cold
mornings is primarily due to
nitrogen dioxide. It is one of the
pollutants known generically as
oxides of nitrogen. a primary
ingredient in the formation of
smog.
Nitrogen dioxide is a by-
product of all combustion and is
Nitrogen Dioxide
emitted from sources such as
motor vehicles, industrial boilers
and heaters.
An irritating gas, nitrogen
dioxide can damage the cells
lining the respiratory tract and
increase susceptibility to infection.
Neither the federal nor the
state standard for nitrogen dioxide
was violated in 1994.
Number of Hours Maximum
Annual Average Exceeding 1-Hour Date of Maximum
Station Federal Standard State Standard Concentration Concentration
5 pphm 1.Hour Concentration in pphm
> 25 pphm
Alpine 1.3 0 6.9 Dec. 3
Chula Vista 2.0 0 10.1 Jan. 2
Downtown SO 2.4 0 12.7 Jan. 22
EI Cajon 2.4 0 10.7 Jan. 21
Escondido 2.4 0 15.7 Jan. 22
Kearny Mesa 2.4 0 20.9 Jan. 5
Oceanside 2.0 0 12.3 Jan. 22
Otay Mesa 2.0 0 12.8 Sept. 26
Carbon Monoxide
Number of Days Number of Days
Exceeding Exceeding Maximum Date of Maximum
Station Federal Standard State Standard 8.Hour Average 8.Hour Average
8.Hour Average 8.Hour Average Concentration Concentration
Concentration Concentration in ppm
> 9 ppm > 9.0 ppm
Chula Vista 0 0 3.6 Dec. 21
Curbside 0 0 6.3 Jan. 4
Downtown SO 0 0 7.3 Dec. 21
EI Cajon 0 0 4.3 Dec. 20
Escondido 0 0 8.0 Dec. 20
Kearny Mesa 0 0 3.8 Dec. 19
Oceanside 0 0 3.9 Dec. 19
Otay Mesa 0 0 4.8 Dec. 21
-5-
! ~) (
,_,..._"...._"""~ ,'.' , ,.r """"',...,...'- "-~""-'''''''''1''>~",...~",,~.
~ Air Pollution Control District
Particulate Matter
Although all airborne par-
ticles can pose a potential health
problem, the greatest concern is
for microscopic, invisible par-
ticles less than 10 microns in
diameter called PM 10 that can
be inhaled into the lungs.
Depending on their size,
these particles affect different
parts of the respiratory tract.
Particles 2.5 to 10 microns tend
to collect in the upper portion of
the respiratory system whereas
those 2.5 microns and smaller
can penetrate deeper into the
lungs and damage lung tissue.
In a seven-year national
study, researchers from Brigham
Young University and Harvard
reported a 17 per cent increase in
deaths from respiratory and heart
disease in polluted cities com-
pared to clean-air cities. An
estimated 60,000 people die in
the United States each year from
particulate air pollution.
Particulate matter is formed
in two ways: (I) from direct
emissions such as road dust, dust
storms, construction, wood smoke,
motor vehicles, and other com-
bustion processes and (2) from
the condensation and chemical
reaction of sulfur dioxide (Sax),
nitrogen dioxide (NOx), and
hydrocarbons in the atmosphere.
In 1994, federal standards for
PM I 0 were not exceeded al-
though one violation occurred;
federal standards allow for one
violation. However, the stricter
state standards for PM 1 0 were
not met.
Particulate Matter (PM 10)
~
Annual Annual Max. 24-Hour Sample
Arithmetic Mean Geometric Mean Federal Standard Date of Maximum
Station
< Federal Standard State Standard 15Ollg/m3 24.Hour Sample
50 Ilg/m3 3Ollg/m3 State Standard
50 Ilg/m3
Chula Vista 28 24 61 Jan. 20
Downtown SO 34 29 76 Jan. 2
El Cajon 35 31 74 Jan. 20
Escondido 35 31 70 Nov. 22
Kearny Mesa 30 26 60 Jan. 20
Oceanside 29 25 75 Jan. 2
Otay Mesa 51 47 129 Jan. 20
Sulfur Dioxide
Number of Days
Annual Average Exceeding Maximum 1.Hour
Station Federal Standard State Standard Concentration Date of Maximum
3 pphm 24.Hour Average in pphm Concentration
Concentration
> 5 pphm
Chula Vista 0.2 0 9.8 June 29
'--<
Downtown SD 0.3 0 6.9 April 20 I
Otay Mesa 0.3 0 6.2 June 10
Sulfur Dioxide
Lead
Sulfur dioxide is not a
problem in San Diego County
because the county .does not
have the heavy manufacturing
and refining associated with this
pollutant.
There were no violations or
exceedances of the state or
federal sulfur dioxide standard.
Historically, the use of lead
compounds in gasoline was a
major source of lead in the
atmosphere, but as the use of
leaded gasoline has decreased,
lead levels in the air have
steadily declined.
Lead particles small enough
to be inhaled into the lungs are
readily absorbed into
the bloodstream and
target the central
nervous system.
Children are particu-
larly vulnerable.
Both the federal -
and state air quality
standards for lead
were met in 1994.
Lead
Federal Standard State Standard
Station Quarterly Average Monthly Average
Concentration Concentration
= 1.5 Ilg/m3 = 1.5Ilu/m3
Downtown SO 0.02 0.02
EI Cajon 0.01 0.01
. LEAD DA fA A VA/LABLE ONi Y fHROUGH JUNE 94
-6-
1 994 Annual Report <lIlII
Accomplishments in 1994
Smog Reclassifications
c_.......
In September 1994, the federal Environmental
Protection Agency (EP A) announced its intent to
reclassify the San Diego Air Basin from a severe to
a serious ozone (photochemical smog) non-
attainment area. This was completed in early 1995
relieving local business of several significant
regulatory requirements.
The reclassification eliminates the requirement
for a federal trip reduction program whereby
employers with 100 or more employees must
reduce the number of employee vehicles arriving at
the worksite.
In addition, the reclassification raises the major
source emission threshold from 25 to 50 tons per
year for (1) stationary sources to obtain federal
operating permits, (2) new and modified stationary
sources to meet federal new source review require-
ments, and (3) stationary sources to apply reason-
ably available control technology. It also eases the
previous 1.3 to 1 offset ratio for new and modified
emission sources to 1.2 to I.
The California Air Resources Board (ARB)
lowered San Diego's state classification from
severe to serious in 1993.
State Implementation Plan
Revision
The District's 1994 revision to the State Imple-
mentation Plan (SIP) shows that San Diego County
will be able to attain the federal ozone standard by
1999, the attainment deadline for serious areas.
Using the computerized Urban Airshed Model,
the District demonstrated to the Environmental
Protection Agency that local emissions will not
cause ozone concentrations exceeding the federal
standard and, even when considering transported
ozone and precursor emissions from the South
Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area), the ozone
standard can still be attained.
The modeling indicates the maximum predicted
ozone concentration for 1999 is 11.1 pphm from
local emissions and 11.6 pphm from transport. The
federal standard is 12 pphm.
Total Quality Management
The District began implementing a Total
Quality Management (TQM) process focusing on
continuous quality improvement in 1994.
The first training module - Introduction to
TQM - was launched during the summer followed
by Customer Service. (The third module -Tools -
was held in early 1995.)
A Quality Council was formed to oversee
TQM's development at the District. Leadership,
guidance and assistance in the TQM process was
provided by Carpenter Technology, San Diego
Consulting Group, Sony Corporation, San Diego
Gas & Electric Co., Kelco, and the Industrial
Environmental Association.
Permit Streamlining
In 1994, the District continued local and state-
wide efforts to improve its permit program.
During fiscal year 1993-94, the number of
Authorities to Construct issued within 60 days
improved by 10 per cent over previous years, and
the number of Permits to Operate issued within 60
days improved by 37 per cent.
New permit procedures have streamlined the
permit process. Developed by the Air Pollution
Permit Streamlining (APPS) Committee, this
working group of local industry representatives and
the District have been meeting every three weeks to
evaluate processing and recommend improvements.
Prior to filing a new application, engineers are
now available to discuss permit applications and
compliance requirements to make sure the applica-
tion is as complete as possible when submitted.
-7-
1 ! C'
~ Air Pollution Control District
The District has also established a review process
that reduces the number of steps. In addition, an
applicant's self-certification for compliance with
District rules may be accepted in lieu of an inspection.
The District is participating in a statewide
committee of air districts and the California Air
Resources Board to implement a registration
program for portable equipment. This would allow
equipment to be registered in one air district and
moved to other districts without having to get a
separate permit from each. A model regulation has
been approved.
Permit Assistance Center
The San Diego Regional Permit Assistance
Center opened in 1994 to provide business with a
central "one stop" location for permit assistance
and information.
The center is located on the fourth floor of the
City Operations Building at 1222 First A venue,
downtown San Diego. Open weekdays from 8 a.m.
to 4 p.m., the phone number is (619) 236-7279.
The District is one of the participating agencies
along with the City of San Diego, San Diego
County Environmental Health Services, the Cali-
fornia Environmental Protection Agency, the
Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the
California Department of Fish and Game.
.The center is staffed by professionals from
APCD and the other agencies to help businesses
identify what they need to do to comply with
various governmental regulations. The center's
staff will also assist businesses by facilitating the
issuance of permits and acting as an ombudsman to
help move permits through the regulatory process.
Titl e V
In" developing regulations to implement the
Title V federal permitting program, the District
worked with the California Air Pollution Control
Officers Association (CAPCOA) to successfully
negotiate a general prohibitory rule that will re-
duce the impacts of Title V on small sources.
Title V of the 1990 Amendments to the federal
Clean Air Act mandates that specified stationary
-.
sources of air pollution - including hazardous air
contaminants - obtain federally-approvable operat-
ing permits in addition to local air district permits.
Efforts are currently underway to further
simplify the program.
Rule Development
The District developed or enhanced 35 rules
during 1994 that were required by either state or
federal law .
Three new rules were adopted to control emis-
sions of volatile organic compounds (VOC's) from
bakeries, paint and ink manufacturers, and polysty-
rene foam product manufacturers. VOC's react with
nitrogen oxides in the presence of sunlight to create
photochemical smog.
· New Rule 67.24 regulates the ethanol and
other VOC's formed during the fermenta-
tion of sugars in bread dough, then emitted
to the atmosphere during baking.
· New Rule 67.19 requires coating manufac-
turers to equip mixing vats with lids, use
low- VOC solvents or enclosed equipment
for cleaning, and install submerged fill
pipes on large storage tanks.
· New Rule 67.22 controls VOC emissions
from operations that manufacture expand-
able polystyrene foam products such as
disposable cups and packing materials.
The foam is produced using pentane, a
VOC, as a blowing agent.
Four new rules to limit oxides of nitrogen
emissions from electrical generating steam boilers;
industrial and commercial boilers, heaters and
steam generators; stationary internal combustion
reciprocating engines; and stationary turbine
engines were also adopted in 1994.
-.
New Source Review Rules
The District amended its New Source Review
Rules 20.1 through 20.4 and District Rule 60
(Circumvention). These changes affect all new and
modified equipment for which an Authority to
Construct or Permit to Operate is required by
District regulations.
~
-8-
As required by state law, the revised rules
require emission offsets for all emission increases
from new and modified emission units at stationary
sources with the potential to emit 15 tons per year
or more of any nonattainment air pollutant (or
precursors) such that there is no net increase in
emissions from these permitted stationary sources.
In addition, Best Available Control Technology
is required for any new or modified unit that has
the potential to emit more than 10 pounds per day
of any nonattainment air pollutant (or precursors).
Mobile Source Emission Credits
A new rule was adopted in 1994 that allows
emission reduction credits from motor vehicles to
be registered as "credits" in a District "bank".
Industry can withdraw these credits later to meet
state and federal Clean Air Act offset requirements.
New District Rule 27 specifies how mobile
source emission credits can be created including
accelerating vehicle retirement (scrapping pro-
gram), purchasing low-emission transit buses or
zero-emission (electric) vehicles, and retrofitting
vehicles to meet low-emission standards.
Like a stationary source credit, a mobile source
credit becomes a commodity the owner may use as
an offset or sell to another party. Emission offsets
must originate in the San Diego Air Basin and be
real, quantifiable, enforceable, and not regulated by
any other local, state, or federal policy.
1994 Air Toxics Annual Report
The District has released the 1994 Air Toxics
Annual Report required by the state Air Toxics
Information and Assessment Act (AB2588). The
report presents the amounts and types of potentially
toxic compounds emitted by 1,400 facilities in San
Diego County between 1989 and 1991.
The report shows that automobiles and other
mobile sources emit 7,500 tons of toxic compounds
annually; industrial sources 6,000 tons; and area
and natural sources approximately 2,800.
Based on estimated emissions and their toxicity,
businesses may be required to prepare health risk
assessments. To date, 54 facilities have been
required to do health risk assessments. If a signifi-
cant risk exists, the affected public must be notified.
1994 Annual Report ~
The program was amended in 1993 and now
requires facilities which pose significant risk to
nearby businesses or residences to.reduce their
toxic emissions to below significant risk levels.
The District is currently establishing significant
risk levels and developing procedures for public
notification.
AB 2766 Projects
Seventeen new local programs designed to cut
smog and traffic congestion began operation in
1994 thanks to the allocation of $8.8 million in
vehicle registration funds by the Air Pollution
Control Board.
Some of the programs were:
· An old-car buy-back and scrapping program
to get 1,000 pre-l 982 vehicles off the road.
· A guaranteed ride-home program for
commuter express bus passengers who
need to work late or require emergency
transportation during the work day.
· A countywide public information campaign
to promote the District's smoking vehicle
hotline and commute trip reduction.
· New "air care" buses using natural gas to
begin replacing old diesel buses.
The vehicle registration fund was established
through Assembly Bill 2766.
Yearly Activity *
1,070
512
1,273
1,818
647
118
501
415
623
1,107,882
425
$135,862
5,664
Permit Applications
Authorities to Construct
Permits to Operate
Engineering Evaluations
Sources Inventoried
Air Toxics Assessments
Notices of Violation
Notices to Comply
Complaint Investigations
Monitoring Hours
Source Tests
Penalties Collected
Persons at District Presentations
* Figures hased Oil Fiscal Year /993-/994
-9-
! I
~ Air Pollution Control District
.-."
The Clean Air Acts
Both the United States Government and the
State of California have enacted legislation de-
signed to improve air quality.
The federal Clean Air Act covers the entire
country. Under this law, the federal Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) sets limits on how much
of each pollutant can be in the air anywhere in the
United States. The law allows individual states to
have stronger standards, but states are not allowed
to have weaker standards than those set for the
entire country.
EP A has identified nonattainment areas for
each criteria pollutant. EP A then classified the
nonattainment areas according to the extent of the
pollution. There are five classes of nonattainment
areas for smog ranging from marginal (relatively
easy to clean up quickly) to extreme (which will
take a lot of work and a long time to clean up).
The 1990 Clean Air Act uses this classification
system to tailor Gleanup requirements to the sever-
ity of the pollution and set deadlines for reaching
cleanup goals.
Under San Diego's current federal classifica-
tion as a serious area, the federal act requires the
following:
t.I Federal ozone standard attainment by 1999
and a demonstration that the State Imple-
mentation Plan provides for attainment.
t.I Emissions reduced 15 per cent between
1990 and 1996, and reduced 3 per cent each
year thereafter until attainment.
t.I Major source defined as those emitting 50
or more tons per year of nonattainment
pollutants or precursors.
t.I Reasonably Available Control Technology
(RACT) required on all major sources of
non attainment pollutants or precursors.
t.I Permitting program for nonattainment
pollutants or precursors requiring: (I)
Lowest Achievable Emission Rate (LAER)
control technology and (2) emissions offsets
-10-
at a ratio of 1.2 to 1.0 to compensate for any
increased emissions from a new or modified
source.
t.I Transportation Control Measures if vehicle
travel and emissions exceed attainment
demonstration levels.
t.I Enhanced motor vehicle inspection and
maintenance program.
t.I Clean-fuel vehicle program.
II' Enhanced air quality monitoring.
California adopted its own Clean Air Act in
1988. This legislation set statewide guidelines for
air districts in developing strategies to reduce the
sources of air pollution that contribute to smog.
Areas were classified and specific measures were
required in their attainment plans based on the
severity of their pollution problem.
As a state serious area, San Diego is subject to
the following:
t.I 5 per cent annual reduction in hydrocarbons
and oxides of nitrogen emissions from 1987
until standards are attained. If this 5 per
cent reduction cannot be obtained, every
feasible measure must be implemented.
t.I Use of Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for existing stationary
sources.
t.I Permitting program requiring (1) Best
A vailable Control Technology (BACT) on
new and modified equipment that emits
10 or more pounds per day of non-
attainment pollutants or precursors, and
(2) emission offsets for all increases in
emissions of non-attainment pollutants or
precursors at sources with emissions of
nonattainment pollutants or precursors of
15 or more tons per year.
t.I Transportation control measures to achieve
an average of 1.4 persons per passenger
vehicle during weekday commute hours by
1999 or programs providing equivalent
emission reductions not otherwise required.
.-."
.-."
1994 Annual Report ~
"-
Emission Sources
Smog is formed from the chemical reactions of
hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen in the pres-
ence of sunlight (ultraviolet light). Motor vehicle
tailpipe emissions are responsible for 64 per cent of
the pollutants that form smog.
Today's cars are 90 per cent cleaner than they
were 30 years ago, but San Diego's population has
more than doubled since 1970. There's more
people, more cars, and more people driving further
and usually alone, especially to work. Today,
people driving to work contribute more to the smog
problem than emissions from the places they work.
The following pie chart illustrates the sources
of smog-forming emissions.
Cars, Trucks & Buses
64%
Home
Products .......
80/0 I I I I
... ..
t
... ... I -, Agriculture
1_ 1%
. I.
*Based on 1990 Emissions Data
-11 -
~ Air Pollution Control District
San Diego's Smog Problem
In San Diego County, clean air standards are
exceeded most frequently in the foothills east of the
metropolitan area.
As illustrated above, emissions from motor
vehicles and industry are generated in the populated
coastal plain and blown inland by the onshore
breeze to the lower mountain slopes stretching
from Palomar Mountain south to the border. These
precursor emissions react in the area's abundant
sunshine to create ozone, commonly called smog.
A temperature inversion layer traps these
pollutants against the slopes and prevents them
from rising. It is formed when warm, dry air
overlies the cool, moist marine air. The inversion
layer hovers around 2,000 feet during the peak
smog season - May through October.
Because photochemical reactions take time to
transform precursor emissions into smog, peak
-
ozone concentrations usually occur in the afternoon
when sunshine is most intense.
The problem is further complicated by ozone
and precursor emissions transported to San Diego
from the South Coast Air Basin (the metropolitan
areas of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino, and
Riverside Counties).
During relatively mild "Santa Ana" weather
conditions, winds blowing toward the southwest
transport South Coast's polluted air out over the
ocean, and the sea breeze brings it onshore into San
Diego County.
When the transported smog is at ground level,
the highest ozone concentrations are measured at
coastal and near-coastal monitoring sites. When
the blown-in smog cloud is elevated, coastal sites
may be passed over, and the transported ozone is
measured further inland.
.....
-12 -
II
1994 Annual Report ~
Smog Trends
In 1994, ozone (smog) concentrations measured in San Diego County exceeded the federal ozone air
quality standard on nine days. However, on only two of those days was the peak ozone concentration
attributed primarily to emission sources within San Diego County. On the other seven days, ozone trans-
ported into San Diego from the South Coast Air Basin (the Los Angeles area) was a significant factor.
The graphs below show the number of days the federal and state standards were exceeded each year
with the columns further broken down to show whether the standard was violated primarily due to local
emissions or transported pollution.
Number of Days Exceeding Federal Clean Air Standard
100
87
(Federal Standard> 12 pphm)
78
75
o
61
51 55
50 46
40 41 39
34 26 32 (75% 26
74%) (65% (71%)
50
25
o Transport Days
II Local Days
Number of Days Exceeding State Clean Air Standard
200
192
167
150 146 148
125 131
114
100 (68%)
160 158
(State Standard> 9 pphm)
50
106
-
o
1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994
-13 -
I I !
I
. 0
~ Air PQllution Control District
-
About the District
The San Diego County Air Pollution Control
District's primary goal is to reduce air pollution to
levels that have been established to protect public
health. This is accomplished through an integrated
monitoring, engineering and compliance operation.
The District's authority comes from
state law and, in certain cases, federal
law. Each division at the District
plays a key role in protecting the
public from the adverse impacts
of polluted air.
Engineering
This division manages a
permit system to ensure that
potentially polluting operations
and industrial equipment meet
the emission standards set forth
in District rules and regulations, the Health and
Safety Code, and the federal Clean Air Act.
Permits are required for any operation or
equipment that is capable of emitting air contami-
nants. An "Authority to Construct" is issued to
authorize construction or installation. A "Permit to
Operate" is issued to authorize operation or use of
the equiment.
Engineering is responsible for developing air
quality rules and regulations, preparing stationary
source emissions inventories, implementing air
toxic emissions inventory and control programs, and
evaluating special projects that impact air quality.
Monitoring also performs laboratory and field
testing for stationary sources of air pollution,
prepares regular and special air quality reports, and
is responsible for all air quality modeling.
Compliance
Helping industry understand and
comply with District regulations
and state law is this division's
primary focus. Advisories are
sent when new rules are
adopted to explain the new
requirements to all those
affected. They are also sent
to explain District policies
and procedures on a variety
of compliance and air quality
Issues.
AIR PIILUTION CONlROl DlmlCT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Monitoring
& Technical Services
This division maintains an ambient air monitor-
ing network that continuously records pollution
levels and meteorological information.
Air quality readings and next-day forecasts are
recorded daily on the District's 24-hour Air Quality
Forecast Message line. The recording also pro-
vides advance notice if there is the possibility of a
health advisory or smog alert.
-
Field staff inspect both permitted and non-
permitted sources of air contaminants to ensure
permit conditions and air pollution laws are fol-
lowed. Compliance also investigates citizen
complaints on air quality matters.
Air Resources
& Strategy Development
, Air Resources & Strategy Development
(ARSD) prepares long-term regional plans to
reduce unhealthful pollution levels. Specific
strategies and control measures are developed to
achieve clean air standards set by the federal and
state governments.
ARSD also administers vehicle registration
funds established by state Assembly Bill 2766,
funding projects designed to reduce air pollution
caused by motor vehicles.
Administrative Services
Administrative Services prepares and adminis-
ters the District budget, provides data management
support, and performs business and accounting
functions for all other District divisions.
..-,..
-14-
! r--/
Air Pollution Control Board
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors is
the Air Pollution Control Board for San Diego
County.
The Board adopts local rules for controlling
air pollution and allocates funding for the
District's operations. The District's funding
comes from the state and federal governments
(18%), fees charged to local businesses and
industries, and vehicle registration fees.
Air Pollution Control Officer
Appointed by the Board, the Air Pollution
Control Officer (APCO) is responsible for all
District programs. The APCO also analyzes and
participates in the formation of federal and state
policy and regulations on air quality.
1994 Annual Report <llIII
The Hearing Board
Established by state law, the Hearing Board
consists of five members (an attorney, an engineer,
a medical expert, and two representatives of the
public).
Although appointed by the Air Pollution Con-
trol Board, the Hearing Board is an independent
quasi-judicial body.
Variances are granted only by the Hearing
Board. A variance is an administrative order
granting temporary relief from the provisions of an
air quality regulation. It allows operation while
steps are being taken to come into compliance.
The Hearing Board also hears appeals of .
operating conditions set by the District, appeals
concerning permits, and requests for permit revoca-
tions and abatement orders.
Citizen Participation
The Air Pollution Control District encourages citizens to get involved in District activities by
attending District workshops, hearings, and Board meetings.
Public participation is vital in the rule development process. Workshops are conducted by the
District to discuss a proposed rule and its potential impact so that any necessary revisions can be
made in the early stages. Public hearings are also held prior to any rule adoption or amendment
to allow citizens ample opportunity to voice their concerns.
The District also encourages representa-
'tives of local industries and interested citizens
to apply to participate on District advisory
committees and work groups.
The Air Pollution Control District Advi-
sory Committee's nine members are appointed
by the Air Pollution Control Board. This
committee makes recommendations on
matters relating to the District's annual bud-
get, permit fees, annual progress reports, and
regulatory changes.
The Air Pollution Permit Streamlining
(APPS) Committee consists of District staff,
military representatives, and members of the
Industrial Environmental Association. The
APPS Committee recommends improvements
for permit processing and customer service.
-15 -
II
~ Air Pollution Control District
Ambient Air Quality Standards
.-..
California Standards
National Standards
PoUutant Averaging Tune Concentration Method Primary Secondary Method
I Hour 0.09ppm 0.12 ppm Same as Primary Ethylene
Ozone - (235Ilg/m.H Chemiluminescence
8 lIour 9.0 ppm 9ppm Non-Dispersive
(10 mflm.i) Non-Dispersive (10 mg/m.H
Carbon Infnlfed Spectroscopy Infrared Spectntscopy
Monoxide 20 ppm (".'DIR) .i5ppm (t.'DIR)
I Hour m mg/m.3) (40 mg/m3)
Annual Average 0.053 ppm
- (100 Ilg/m.i) Gas Phase
Nitrogen Gas Phase Same as Primary
Dioxide 0.25 ppm Chemiluminescence Standards Chemiluminescence
I Hour (,m Ilg/m.3)
Annual Average 80 Ilglm3 -
- (0.03 ppm)
24 Hour 0.04 ppm I 365 Ilg/m3 I I
Sulfur (l051lglm3) l'ltntviolet (0.14 ppm) Pantrosaniline
Dioxide I Fluorescence I 1300 Ilglm3 I
3 Hour (0.5 ppm)
I Hour 0.25 ppm
(655Ilglm.3)
Suspended Annual MC'dll .30 Ilg/m3 Size Selective 50 Ilg/m.3
Particulate Matter Inlet lIigh - HiRh Volume SampUng
(PM 10) 24 Hour 50 flg/m3 Volume Sampler 150 flg/m3
Sulfates 251lg/m3 Turbidimetric
24 Hour Barium Sulfate
.30 Day Average L5flg/m3 -
Lead Atomic Absorption Atomic Absorption
Calendar Quarter - L51lg/m3 Same as Primary
H}'drogen Sulfide I Hour 003 ppm Cadmium Hydroxide
(42 Ilg/m3) Stntctan .
Vinyl Chloride 24 Hour 0.010 ppm T <dlar Bag Collection,
(Chloroethene) (261Jg/m3 ) Gas Chromatography
In sufficienl amount to produce an rxtinclion coefficient
Visibility Reducing 1 Observation or 02.\ per kilomeler due to particlrs whrn relative
Particles humidity < '0%. \1r-J.'"remenl in accordance wilh ARB
Mrthod v.
:'Iiotes:
I. California s!aI1dards, other than ozone, carbon monoxide. sulfur dioxide (I hour),
nitrogen dioxide. and particulate matter (PM,). are values that are nolto be equaled or
exceeded. The ozone. carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide (I hour), nitrogen dioxide, and
particulate maner (PM ) S!aI1dards are nolto be exceeded.
1. "ational s!al1dards, other than ozone and those based on annual averages or annual
geometric means. are not to be exceeded more than once a year. The ozone
standard is altained when the expected number of days per calendar year with
maximum hourly average concentrations above standard is equal to or less than one.
.i. Concentration is expressed first in units in which it wa.s promulgated. Equivalent
units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of l50C and a
rderence pressure of 760 mm of mercury. All me-dSurements of air quality are to
be corrected to a reference temperature of l50C and a reference pressure of 760
mm of mercury (1,013.2 millibar). Ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume or
micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
4.\ny equivalent procedure that can be shown 10 the satisfaction of the ARB to give
equivalent results at or near the level of the air quality standard may be used.
~
5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary. with an adequate
margin of safety. to protectlhe public health. Each state must altain the primary
standards within a specified number of years after that state's implementation plan
is approved by the Em'ironmentaJ Protection Agency (EPA).
6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to prolectthe
public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a pollutant. Each
state must attain the secondary s!al1dards within a "reasonable time" after the
implementation plan is approved by the EPA.
7. Reference method as described by the EPA: An "equivalent method" of measure-
ment may be used but must have a "consistent relationship to the reference
method" and must be approved by the EPA.
8. Prevailing viSIbility is defined as the greatest visibility that is altained or surpassed
around alleast half of the horizon circle but not necessarily in continuous sector.
9. The annual PM", state standard is based on the geometric mean of all reponed
values taken durin~ the vear. The annual PM", national standard is based on
averaging the quanerly anthmetic means.
.-..
-16 -
1
1994 Annual Report ~
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms
ACID DEPOSITION-The conversion of sulfur oxide
and nitrogen oxide emissions into acidic compounds
that precipitate in rain, snow, fog, or dry particles.
AIR MONITORING-Sampling and measuring
pollutants present in the atmosphere.
AIR BASIN-An area with common and distinctive
meteorological and geographical features. The borders
of the San Diego Air Basin are the boundaries of San
Diego County.
AIR RESOURCES BOARD (ARB)-California's
state agency responsible for clean air programs. The
ARB controls mobile pollution sources but delegates its
authority over stationary sources (such as factories) to
local air quality districts.
AMBIENT AIR-Outside air.
A TT AINMENT -Legal recognition that an area meets
standards for a particular pollutant.
BACT-Best Available Control Technology.
EMISSION INVENTORY -A listing, by source, of
pollutants emitted into a community's atmosphere in
amounts (commonly tons) per day or year.
ENVIRONMENT AL PROTECTION AGENCY
(EP A)-The federal agency concerned with air quality.
HYDROCARBONS-"'--Any of a vast family of com-
pounds containing carbon and hydrogen in various
combinations, found especially in solvents and fuels.
Most of the hydrocarbon compounds are major air
pollutants. They may be active participants in the
photochemical process.
INVERSION-A layer of warm air in the atmosphere
that lies over a layer of cooler air, trapping pollutants.
LAER-Lowest Achievable Emission Rate.
~nXING HEIGHT-Distance from the ground to the
top of the mixed layer of the atmosphere; a measure of
the volume of air available to dilute pollutants.
NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx)-Gases formed prima-
rily from atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen when
combustion takes place, particularly under conditions of
high temperature.
OFFSET-An emission reduction that compensates for
an emission increase.
OZONE LA YER-A naturally occurring layer of
ozone seven to 30 miles above the earth's surface in the
stratosphere. The ozone layer filters out the sun's
harmful ultraviolet radiation. It is not affected by the
ozone in photochemical smog found in the lower
atmosphere. There is no mixing between ozone at
ground level and ozone in the upper atmosphere.
PHOTOCHEMICAL-Requiring the presence of
sunlight for a chemical reaction.
POLLUTANT STANDARDS INDEX (PSI)-A
system of reporting air pollution levels to the public by
assigning them a numerical value.
RISK ASSESSMENT-Evaluation of expected health
impacts on a specific population.
SMOG-Originally an English term contracting
"smoke" and "fog," it is used in California to describe
the mixture of pollutants primarily composed of ozone
and other oxidizing agents.
TOPOGRAPHY -The configuration of a land surface,
including its relief and the position of its natural and
man-made features.
TOXIC-A substance that is poisonous or harmful to
human health, plants or animals.
TRANSPORT A TION CONTROL MEASURES
(TCMs)-Any measure designed to reduce emissions
from transportation such as carpooling, changing traffic
flow patterns, or using mass transit to improve air quality.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC)-An
organic compound that readily evaporates at normal
temperatures; some are smog-forming.
Units of Measurement
m3 - cubic meter.
mm - millimeter; equal to 1/1,000 of a meter.
~ _ micrometer; equal I I 1,000,000 of a meter.
mg - milligram; equal to 1/1,000 of a gram.
~ _ microgram; equal to I I I ,000,000 of a gram.
ppm - parts per million; the number of parts of a
given pollutant in one million parts of air.
pphm - parts per hundred million; the number of parts
of a given pollutant in one hundred million
parts of air.
-17 -
~ Air Pollution Control District
Pollutant Standards Index
.......
Many people, especially those who suffer from
illnesses aggravated by air pollution, need accurate
and easily understandable information about daily
levels. This information allows them to modify
their activities when air pollution levels are high.
One way of conveying air pollution information
is to report the concentration of each pollutant.
However, different pollutants affect health at
different concentrations; thus anyone wanting to
act on the information must remember several
different sets of numbers.
The Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) was
developed by the Environmental Protection Agency
(EP A) to avoid this problem by relating similar
degrees of health effects to a uniform numerical
scale that is based on actual pollutant concentra-
tions. This chart shows how intervals on the PSI
scale relate to the potential health effects of ozone
at the measured concentrations.
Equivalents
The numbers below shows what
a reading in pphm (parts of ozone
per hundred million parts of air)
equates to using the Pollutant
Standards Index.
pphm
Stage 1 20
19
18
17
16
Health Advisory 15
14
13
Federal Standard 12
11
10
State Standard 9
8
7
Good 6
5
4
3
2
1
Stage II Alert - 275
(35 parts per hundred million)
Everyone should remain
indoors.
PSI
200
188
175
163
150
138
125
113
100
92
84
75
67
59
50
42
34
25
17
9
Stage I Alert - 200
(20 parts per hundred million)
General public should avoid
strenuous outdoor activities.
Health Advisory -138
(15 parts per hundred million)
Athletes should avoid strenuous .
outdoor activities.
Federal Standard -100
(12 parts per hundred million)
Sensitive persons should reduce
strenuous outdoor activities.
State Standard - 75 ",
(9 parts per hundred million)
Sensitive persons should reduce
strenuous outdoor activities.
-18 -
-.
....."
I ,~
1994 Annual Report ~
10 Ways to Clear the Air
What can you do about air pollution? Here are some simple suggestions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Reduce your driving. Whenever
possible, combine errands, carpool, use
public transportation, ride a bicycle, or
walk. Telecommute (work from home)
or work longer hours fewer days a
week.
Keep your car in good running condi-
tion and the tires properly inflated.
Also, use less-polluting reformulated
gasoline or drive a clean-fuel vehicle.
Don't top off your gas tank. Gasoline
spillage evaporates and contributes to
smog. It also contains toxic pollutants.
Support the smog check program.
Removing emission control equipment
does not improve engine performance.
Report "smoking" vehicles. Call 1-
800-28-SMOKE to report vehicles with
excessive tailpipe emissions.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
-19 -
Around the home, avoid the use of aerosol
spray products. Most aerosol propellants
contribute to smog.
Use water-based paints and solvents. Oil-
based paints contain three to five times
more toxic solvents than water-based,
latex paints. Also, keep lids closed when
not in use and paint with brushes or rollers
rather than sprayers.
When you fire up the barbecue, use an
electric probe, a chimney that uses news-
papers or new lighter fluid that produces
less emissions than traditional charcoal
lighter.
Use energy-efficient lighting wherever
possible. Make sure lights and appliances
are turned off when not in use. Raise the
temperature level on your air conditioner a
few degrees in summer and turn down the
heat a few degrees in winter. Production
of electricity contributes to air po\1ution.
Insta\1 solar energy. Water and space
heating account for more than 50 per cent
of household energy use.
K .~ ,. '...- . _', 'lJ.""",~.~:Jrw Yf. "
~;"....,""'~
.....,~..~,...,.",
Environmental Protection Agency
1990 Federal Clean Air Act
California Air Resources Board
-
1988 California Clean Air Act
.-.
Citizen
Advisory
Committees
San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board
Hearing
Board
I Air Pollution Control Officer I
I I
Small Business Engineering Compliance
-
~ - Air Resources
Assistance Air Monitoring
& Strategy Development
I I
I I I I
r-- Engineering r-- Monitoring & - Compliance - Air Resources &
Technical Services Strategy Development
I-- Chemical I-- Air Quality Industrial - Long- Term
Monitoring - Inspections Planning
- Mechanical - Stationary Source Citizen Complaint '-- AB 2766 Vehicle
-
Testing Investigations Registration Funds
.
- Air T oxics - Stationary Source 1- Mutual Settlement
Test Witnessing Program
f-- Vapor Recovery & I-- Meteorology - Hearing Board San Diego County
Emissions Inventory & Modeling Liaison
Air Pollution Control Dlstri
Instrument Support, 9150 Chesapeake Drive
- Rule Development - Asbestos Notification San Diego, CA 92123
- Ambient Operation Removal Program
& Maintenance Permit & General Information
(619) 694-3307
- Special Projects Air Quality Forecast Message
Administrative Services (619) 565-6626
Smoking Vehicle Reporting
1-SGO-2S-SMOKE
Clerical Citizen Complaints
Public Information (619) 694-3340
I-- - & Personnel
Small Business Assistance
(619) 694-2288
Accounting Public Information
Data Management -'-- (619) 694.3332
ft & Finance
"'., PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
-.,
ct
.-.
December 1995
AIR PIIlUTHIarnalllllCT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
New Rule 11
Board revises permit exemptions
The Air Pollution Control
Board has adopted a revised
permit exemption rule to benefit
small business. The new rule
adds several types of equipment
and operations emitting small
amounts of air contaminants to
the list of equipment exempt from
having air permits unless the
operation or equipment consti-
tutes a public nuisance.
The new Rule 11 includes
recommendations made by the
County of San Diego Economic
Advisory Board's Sunset Com-
mission to update the rule, clarify
inconsistencies and make it easier
to understand.
In addition, District staff
added several new exemptions,
clarified the rule's intent and
reformatted its structure to make
it easier for businesses to use.
Some of the added exemp-
tions include ink cartridge filling
operations, small coffee roasting
equipment, aerosol can crushing
equipment, fire extinguishing
equipment, nail salon operations
and golf grip application stations
using high boiling point materials.
Sources that use less than 30
gallons per day of materials
containing 20 grams per liter or
less of volatile organic com-
pounds (VOCs) are also exempt.
The rule also has a new
provision exempting equipment
that complies with the District's
planned new equipment registra-
tion program. Eligible equipment
includes emergency generator
engines, certain types of portable
equipment and previously ex-
empt stationary internal combus-
tion engines with a rating of less
than 500 brake horse power (bhp)
installed before April 1983.
Another new provision in
Rule 11 provides flexibility for
unique or small operations with
low emissions to obtain an ex-
emption from permit require-
ments for equipment not listed in
the rule on a case-by-case basis.
The revisions eliminate ex-
emptions for some boilers, steam
generators, gas turbines and
internal combustion engines, all
sources of nitrogen dioxide (NOx)
emissions. These changes were
made to conform with District
rules recently adopted to meet the
requirements of federal Clean Air
Act.
The new rule incorporates all
of the Sunset Commission's first
phase recommendations and
some of the second phase recom-
mendations.
The rest of the commission's
second phase recommendations
are being reviewed and will be
ready for public comment in mid-
1996.
More cash for old clunkers...
Another program to
scrap more old cars has
been approved. Owners
may call (619) 595-5285
for more information.
(See story page 2.)
Last year's program
crushed 1,000 clunkers
which cut an estimated
128.5 tons of smog-
forming emissions from
the region over a three-
year period.
."
"'. __,_.._.>>,."__,..,_~....,,~_.~~m,____._~"___"_"'______
Board funds 1 0 projects
from vehicle registration fee
A program to scrap more than
3700 gross polluting vehicles
during a three-year period was
approved by the Air Pollution
Control Board.
The program was among ten
projects allocated $6.7 million
from the Vehicle Registration
Fund, established through Assem-
bly Bill 2766 to implement and
fund programs to reduce motor
vehicle emissions. The projects
are estimated to reduce 950 tons
of smog-forming pollutants.
The Board designated
$1,980,000 to Ecology Auto
Wrecking for the accelerated
retirement of old vehicles. Under
the program, owners may receive
$600 for cars up to 1974 and $500
for 1975 to 1981 models.
"The goal is to get the worst
polluters off the road," said Dianne
] a cob, chairwoman of the Board.
"That's why we'll pay more for
older cars whose pollution con-
trol devices are not as advanced."
In order to qualify for the
program, cars must be registered
in the county for the past two
years and have a title free of any
liens. Vehicles with a non-operat-
ing registration are not eligible.
The car must be fully functional
and must pass a functional
driving test that includes turning
off the engine and starting it
again. The car must also have all
its basic parts intact.
Owners may call (619) 595-
5285 for program information
and to be put on a waiting list.
Vehicle purchases are expected to
start by January 1.
Another $617,500 was
awarded to Neutronics, Inc., to
retrofit 1,200 older vehicles (1975-
80) during the next three years
with advanced catalytic emission
control systems.
Photo courtesy of Coronado Journal
Ed Hllsdon, Nancy White and Don Kilner disembark one of Coronado's new
compressed natural gas shuttles.
The Board also allocated
$765,000 to the Metropolitan
Transit Development Board
(MTDB) to help purchase 30
clean-fuel buses powered by
compressed natural gas (CNG).
The University of California
San Diego (UCSD) received
$275,400 to establish two connec-
tor shuttle services to the Coaster
commute train.
The City of Oceanside was
awarded $150,200 to fund a
Transit Corridor Study and de-
velop zoning changes; $48,633 to
fund a staff member to develop
and assure the calibration and
efficient start-up of Oceanside's
traffic signal coordination system;
and another $25,000 to assist
employers in implementing a
telecommuting program.
The Board allocated $25,000 to
reduce emissions from heavy duty
trucks that pick up and haul gree...
wastes.
The City of Solana Beach was
awarded $54,000 towards the
development of a multi-use
pathway for bicyclists and pedes-
trians.
The Board designated $38,492
to expand the existing San Diego
County Transit System Guaran-
teed Ride Home Program to
include the North County Transit
District's Coaster commute train
passengers.
The Air Pollution Control
District received $2,041,603 to
offset District costs related to
motor vehicles ($725,245) and air
monitoring costs related to motor
vehicle emissions ($1,316,358). An
additional $523,200 was allocated
for public information programs.
Four programs sponsored by
the Transportation Management ~.
Associations were allocated
funding for Employee Transporta-
tion Coordinator training
($26,778), Commuter Classified
($55,512), vanpooling ($47,975)
and telecommuting ($74,023). '.
.-.
Commuter survey shows
more driving alone
The most comprehensive
survey and analysis of commuters
in San Diego County was recently
completed. A total of 2400 persons
were interviewed by telephone
with a minimum of 300 in six
geographic areas to provide
specific data by travel corridors.
The study found that drive
alone rates are creeping up,
especially during the past two
years. Drive alone rates average
about 75%.
The average commute time in
San Diego County increased
significantly during the 1980's (up
30%), more than any other metro-
politan area. However, the average
commute is less than 20 minutes.
The study compiled a profile
of current carpoolers revealing
that, for most, the match occurs at
work; 42% through an informal
work contact. Only a few carpools
"form" in the neighborhood.
The study showed that 69% of
carpools have two people who
work at the same employer site,
43% commute with another
household member, and 70% ride
with just one other person. And
61 % have been in the same
carpool for more than a year.
Current carpoolers were shown
to be the most pro-environmental
group.
The study showed that a
substantial opportunity exists
region wide for carpooling; 51 % of
commuters are carpool candi-
dates. The largest potential
carpoolers hold manager / profes-
sional positions (42%), followed
by clerical (13%), military (6%),
and students (7%). More than
half are 25-45 years old (55%).
The study revealed that most
potential carpoolers want help in
finding riders (56%) and more
information on options. The
survey showed a need for market-
ing materials, customized
matchlists by employer or busi-
ness cluster, and information on
incentives and other rideshare
programs that work.
The prime motivators for
carpooling were the guaranteed
or emergency ride home (44%),
lower insurance rates (54%) and
gas discounts or cash (43%).
The survey also reflected
community concern about the
environment and traffic conges-
tion and how it affects the
region's quality of life.
About half of those surveyed
did not think air quality had
improved despite significant
improvements in air quality
during the past few years.
The study was conducted
during early 1995 by Illium
Associates, Inc., for the City of
San Diego under a grant from the
Air Pollution Control District.
Board drops
smog indexing
pilot program
A proposed pilot program that
would have created a "smog
index" number and required
annual smog checks for high
polluting vehicles in the county
has been dropped. The Air
Pollution Control Board decided
not to implement the program
after evaluation indicated that it
would be costly and provide little
benefit to air quality.
The program, established by
Senate Bill 2050, was initially
supported by the Board as a
possible alternative to state
employer trip reduction require-
ments. However, Senate Bill 437
was recently passed by the state
legislature and signed by the
Governor rescinding mandated
state employer trip reduction
requirements in San Diego.
Consequently, Board implementa-
tion of the pilot study is no longer
necessary as an alternative.
Tim Sturdavant, left, of Rohr Industries was recently recognized for his efforts in
developing the aerospace air toxics regulation by the Environmental Protection Agency
in Washington D.C. With him is Mary D. Nichols, EPA's assistant administrator for
Air and Radiation.
Locally, Sturdavant was also a key person in the formation of the Permit Stream-
lining Committee, a District/Industry task force. He recently received the Director's
Award from the District. Sturdavant is leaving San Diego to work in Utah.
(";
Board approves border task force recommendation~
The Air Pollution Control
Board has approved the recom-
mendations of the Border Vehicle
Task Force to move ahead with a
public information program and
explore changes to state and
federal law to reduce emissions
from Mexican vehicles commut-
ing to work in California.
California law requires that
Mexican-plated vehicles used to
commute to work in the state
must be registered in California
and subject to smog checks.
After reviewing several
options, the task force concluded
that there is no current practical
means for enforcing the law.
Smog-forming emissions from
all vehicles crossing the border
from Mexico have been estimated
at 13 percent of the vehicle emis-
sions in the San Diego region.
However, commute vehicles are
only a portion of the 13 percent.
The task force recommended
the following:
· Conduct a public informa-
tion campaign aimed at Tijuana
vehicle owners and U. S. employ-
ers to publicize the registration
requirement and emphasize the
benefits of clean air to both sides
of the border.
· Meet with Mexican gov-
ernment officials and the Tijuana
business community to examine
alternatives to reducing emissions
from vehicles crossing the border.
· Work with the Environ-
mental Protection Agency (EPA),
the Immigration and Naturaliza-
tion Service (INS), U. S. Customs,
the Department of Justice and
local and state agencies to reduce
border emissions.
· Pursue legislation to allow
law enforcement officers to im-
pound Mexican-plated commute
vehicles. Current law requires at
least two citations to be issued
before impounding.
Important Numbers
Permit &: General Information
(619) 694.3307
Air Quality Forecast Message
(619) 565.6626
Smoking Vehicle Reporting
1-800-28-SMOKE
Citizen Complaints
(619) 694.3340
Small Business Assistance
(619) 694-2288
Public Information
(619) 694.3332
-.
Air Pollution Control District
County of San Diego
9150 Chesapeake Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
Air Pollution Control Board
Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman
Ron Roberts, Vice.Chairman
Greg Cox
Pam Slater
Bill Horn
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPfR
BULK RATE
U S. POSTAGE
PAID
SAN DIEGO, CALIF.
PERMIT NO. 571
-
r";
MEMORANDUM
To: Ed Batchelder, Planning Dept
Fr: Barbara Bamberger, Environmental Resource Manager
Da: January 24th, 1996
Re: Air Quality Projects -- Growth Management meeting
The city has a commitment to enhancing San Diego's environmental quality, illustrated in its
various air quality improvement programs. Chula Vista's innovative efforts have resulted in a
net decrease in air pollution. The City has lead the state in developing the information highway
as an alternative mode of transportation. For example, the City has been selected a) by the EP A
as a case study for its telecenter project and b) the world's leading urban environmental
organization as one of twelve projects that exemplifies the types of actions local governments can
take in combating global warming.
Other 'firsts' for the City and State of California include:
C02 Reduction Plan
Smogbusters alternative fuel rebate program
Chula Vista's Telecenters
Innovative Educational Curriculum on global warming
Placement of three zero emission Hydrogen Fuel Cell buses into the city's transit
system.
BEST: Businesses for an Environmentally Sustainable Tomorrow, an award and
recognition program for Chula Vista businesses to encourage energy conservation in the
business community
These programs are described below:
Carbon Dioxide Reduction Plan
Chula Vista is part of an international network of cities developing local action plans for reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. It serves as a model of community-based progressive environmental
initiatives which include municipal policy and implementation, and a comprehensive planning
process to address significant environmental concerns through the development of its CO2
Reduction Plan. The City is the first in California to have developed a comprehensive Carbon
Dioxide Reduction Plan which aims to implement public policy changes to reduce the
consumption of carbon dioxide below 1990 levels. This includes land use planning and
transportation planning policies that will result in significant energy consumption reductions -
thus NOx and SOx emission reductions. Total anticipated energy and CO2 savings as a result
of implementation of the major 20 policy measures in the plan is 84,000 tons/yr. Attached is a
list of these policy measures. They include a municipal clean fuel vehicle purchase policy, transit
oriented site design planning, pedestrian friendly site design, increased land-use mix, to name
a few.
~.
SmogBusters Alternative 1 llel Rebate Program
Chula Vista is the first municipality in the United States to have established a rebate program
focusing on electric vehicle rebates. In place for only six months, local residents and businesses
have taken advantage of the City's rebate program, resulting in $22,000 worth of rebates
allocated thus far and placement of 5 electric vehicles and 2 CNG vehicles to replace gasoline
powered vehicles. The City has calculated a CO2 savings of 27 tons/yr.
..-"
Hydrogen Fuel Cell Project
The City will be placing three state-of-the-art hydrogen powered fuel cell transit buses into its
transit fleet. Doing so, the City has become one of three demonstration sites in North America.
These vehicles will replace 2 diesel buses and one new route, that would have employed a diesel
bus as well. The project will run for 500,000 miles and result in zero emissions. The City has
calculated a CO2 savings of 2,722 CO2 tons per year.
Chula Vista Telecenters
The City is the national leader integrating telecommunications technology with existing suburban
land use patterns to provide opportunities for residents to keep their regular jobs and work closer
to home, spending retail dollars within the communities in which they live. Currently we have
a 40 % occupancy rate for the East H Street telecenter, which includes a 30 % turnover rate, and
a 27 % occupancy rate for the F Street Telecenter. By moving the work to the worker instead
of the other way around, the City is currently eliminating 954 vehicle miles traveled per week,
based upon our quarterly reports. Additionally, renters and meetings held at the telecenters also
contributed to 832 miles reduced during the last quarter of 1995, for example. Finally, the City
eliminated over 4,000 miles per month from the use of our distance learning partnership with the
University of Phoenix, which has enabled students to attend classes in Chula Vista rather than
driving to Kearny Mesa. Likewise, the telecenter has begun a partnership with National
University to conduct distance learning courses (real time courses held at National University but
videoconferenced to the telecenter for local students to participate - thus eliminating the drive to
the University.
....,.,
Education
Through its participation in an international consortium of cities addressing global climate change
issues, Chula Vista has established a nationally recognized global warming curriculum for
elementary students. This curriculum focuses on ways the students, collectively and individually,
can take personal action to reduce their contribution to global warming.
This one week curriculum focused on local energy use and global warming, culminating in public
policy decisions developed by six grade students and presented to the City Council. This
curriculum was so well received that the Environmental Protection Agency has recently contacted
the City and proposed that they distribute the City I S curriculum, along with training workshops
to 10,000 - 30,000 teachers throughout the nation in 1996. This project is a long term project
aimed at future behavioral shifts to local air quality improvements.
--.,
2
/\1
\?-~':
Smart Community
A Smart Community is a community that employs on-line services (i.e. internet, world wide
web, etc..) to promote local participation and cooperation among government, business, education
and health care, and to enable residents to conduct business from their homes, reducing the need
to get in the car and make an unnecessary trip. Smart-Communities will outreach to the
community to determine how government and services can result in a more efficient, cost
effective and meaningful way to live our lives, using interactive telecommunications. The result
of this project will be less trips through town.
Chula Vista's Businesses for an Environmentally Sustainable Tomorrow (BEST) Awards:
This year ushers in the inception of a new business incentive program which recognizes local
businesses for their "efforts to preserve natural resources and protect our environment." BEST
resulted from the City's interest in finding a way to reward businesses that practice energy
efficiency and related conservation goals. Known as Businesses for an Environmentally
Sustainable Tomorrow, or "Chula Vista's BEST", this program will reward Chula Vista
businesses for their in-house efforts by giving awards in four areas: energy efficiency, water
conservation, waste reduction/recycling, clean and efficient transportation/employee trip
reduction. Businesses will receive recognition at an annual Chula Vista BEST awards ceremony
and will become case studies to be published and distributed by the City, providing a model for
other businesses in the City.
Energy Retrofit Program
,- The City has embarked on a comprehensive retrofit program. As part of this program, the City
will be reducing its energy consumption through lighting retrofit in over 30 buildings. Phase I
has reduced the City's energy use by 1,022,628 kw/year and 1,865,800 lbs C02 annually. Phase
II has reduced the City's energy use by 352,044 kw/year. Phase III will begin in 1996 and will
incorporate the purchase of energy-conserving office equipment such as computers, copiers,
faxes, and printers. It will also complete the final portion of our retrofit program, addressing
the City's energy use related to its mechanical systems (heating, ventilation and air conditioning
systems, pumps, etc.. .).
YanPool Program
The City is beginning an employee vanpool program in 1996. We will be purchasing three
compressed natural gas ultra-low emission vans for employees to vanpool from their homes to
City Hall.
3
..
\
~..)
,--.
I
6. Action Plan
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
r
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
(
Table 6.3
SHOR~RANGEACTIONMEASUPES
Municipal clean fuel vehicle purchases.
Private fleet clean fuel vehicle purchases.
Municipal clean fuel demonstration projects.
Telecommuting and telecenters.
Transit stop improvements.
Enhanced pedestrian connections to transit.
Increased housing density near transit.
Site design with transit orientation.
Increased land-use mix generally.
Reduced commercial parking requirements.
Site design with pedestrianlbicycle orientation.
Bicycle integration with transit and employment/shopping.
Bicycle lanes and routes.
Energy efficient landscaping.
Solar pool heating.
Traffic signal lamp improvements.
Student transit subsidy.
Energy efficient building recognition program.
Municipal life-cycle purchasing standards.
Shopper shuttle.
-
80
9/1/95 Dra~
~"'"'
.
6'iAm9 t.E...
Appendix H
Measure 11
SITE DESIGN WITH PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE ORIENTATION
Description
Placement of buildings and circulation
routes primarily for pedestrians and
bicyclists rather than for autos; includes
pedestrian benches, bike paths, bike racks.
Target Sector
Transportation
Implementation Costs
N/A
Economic Impacts
Increased personal income from reduced
driving.
Funding Options
N/A
CO2 Reduction
4,300 lonslyr in 2010.
Sector Penetration
N/A
Savings ($/yr in 2010)
Energy
Avoided driving
Avoided CO2 damage
$681,000
7,818,000
219.000
$8,718,000
Implementation Responsibilities
Planning Department
Implementation Schedule
1996-2010; dependent on rate of new
development and opportunities for redevelopment.
573\APP-H
216
9/1/95 Draft
p'OlPC1'i 0 \Y~ 1)
-PROPOSED DRAFT REVISED THRESHOLD ST ANDARD-
AIR QUALITY
GOAL:
To maintain and improve the ambient air quality enjoyed by the citizens of Chula Vista.
OBJECTIVE:
Recognizing that air quality is an issue which c::mnot be effectively 1'l~~dst9~ addressed
by Chul3 Vista, itP(,)thtti~t~j9tl~1~tJ(j19q~lle\t~I$~ the City shall ~f1d~~ygrt9 implement
the t::Jctics established in the currently adopted Region31 .^.ir Qu::lIity M3intenance Plan
(AQM P) a.........P......P..........I.tc~~)Ie...air..qt.laljty.impi()vemeht...strategi~s.Uan(j.Pfpgrchri$that...meet...or....... e....)(c. ee... (j
~h()$.~~$.talJli~~ftd~bt9u9ht~epq~J1t1y~~gptedR.~glgl1~l~ir9t1<llitY~tr~tegy(RAg9)~nd
tb~~~9.$~qlJ~~qt.l~ntil1'lple~tlJ$ij<mme~l1>t.lr~s;
THRESHOLD:
The G+ty <'$Mg9 shall 3nnually .~. provideg the S3n Diego APCD with 3 12 to 18 month
development forecast and request an eV31u3tion of its imp3ct on current and future ::Jir
quality management programs, along with recent air quality data. The growth forecast and
APeD response letters shall be provided to the GMOC for inclusion in its review. With<<.=ln
af\nU~t..fe,pq~wfjiph:
1;.Prqyidesanoverview .and .evaluationofloc(i1geVelopmenfprojects~ppr()v~d
9lJrimrtheprioryear to determine.. to~h~te~teflttheyirnplernentedmeasures
designedtofosterajrqualityimproven1etltpursuanttorelev~ntregionaL and
jOPl1t~irqtJaHtyil'J'lprqYernent .stratfaSies.
2> >1(j~J1tifie~yvh~tti~r~h~pity'sq~v~!9Pf'1'W~Qt(t~glJl~ti()fls>.p()lipj~s~rig
pr()ct3t1ur~srelat~to.arn:l/9rarecqrl~i~Jt:lflI~i.JI)AUttentappliCabl~r=~(ier~J,
9t~tt9a.n(jl~9ioh~l~irqt.l~tityTt39tJl*tI9f'1~~I'l(jpr99ta.m$.
3. .ld~I'\~~$ri()n..a~\f.~I()pm~rlt~Re9ifjp~.BtI.Jiti~~q$inglJricif~rtaf{enRytheCity
~~lf~lB~o~rP~G~f~.~~~~~;;~t,t~lr~~~~I~$ld~~~~~(;~I~i~h[~la~i9n~
iliheCiJY$n~npr6Vi()e,aC6P~()fsaidrep()rttOtH~~~Pt)>f()rrevieWahdcorrlmentl"
addjtj()n'#'l.~p\RKQ~hanrepOrtOnO"er~.11JegiqJ1~I~nQlocatairqUalityc()J)9itigns,tJ'le
~t~tlJ~pf.regi9n~lairqu~lityitnPrt)Vjm~nt.i.rnPlfJfl'l7n~~~gnl7ffOrtsU9dertht3R~Qiqqelf\ir
gHelityettetr~Y~J}9n~I.~trdr*tdfJt~tepgBt~!~.Br.BQr~~.'~Jlti.thfJaffe9t9ftJ19~T
~ff()q~pr()9JErn~()~t4h~qityof:ghlJl"Yi~t~~nqjgq~lp.!a.nnin9~ndqt3\1fJlqPrnt3nt~qti\titi~~..
f )
IMPLEMENTATION MEASURE:
~
Should the GMOC determine that a potentially serious problem exists with respect to ~~y
9ftb~~pg'l~ air qua I ityifl'tprq'l~~rit~ft'6l1sateitb~rtti~I?R~lqrrf.'9i()fl~d]~y~I,9rb9th,. it
may adopt a formal "Statement of Concern" within its annual report. Such a "Statement"
requires the City Council to consider the adoption of a resolution reflecting that concern
during the public hearing on the GMOC's report;g9P.~~Qttljg~Ri~rl1~l'lyi~!i~II~J$() ~
be directed to tAe i9Y9t!i~r: responsible public agency(i~~) with follow up to assure
appropriate response by that agency(i~$).
(3/14/95)
(A:\GMOC-94'AQ- THSRV.STD)
~.
~
\-> '
~<<)\,x S
Memorandum
To:
From:
Growth Management Oversight Commission
Ed Batchelder, Senior Plann~
David J. Palmer, Library Director ~
December 1, 1995
1995 Threshold Compliance Review
Via:
Date:
Subject:
During this review period, July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995, the Library met
the threshold requirement of 500 square feet of adequately equipped and staffed
library facility per 1,000 population.
Compliance was achieved with the opening of the new 37,000 square foot South
ChuIa Vista Library in April 1995. The South Chula Vista Library implements a
major component of the Library Master Plan and was funded jointly by the City
of Chula Vista and the California State Library.
The South Chula Vista Library joins the existing Civic Center/Main Library
(55,000 square feet) and EastLake Library (10,000 square feet) to form the
ChuIa Vista Public Library system. During the review period, the 1,720 square
foot Castle Park/Otay Library and 609 square foot Woodlawn Park Libraries
were closed due to their proximity to the new library at 4th and Orange. Total
system-wide square footage is now 102,000. With a June 30, 1995 population
estimate of 154,350, the threshold requires 77,175 square feet of library space.
Current square footage exceeds this threshold requirement by 24,825 square
feet. Based upon even the highest population guesstimate for the year 2000
(196,680) , compliance is assured through that date.
The City's three year agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School
District to jointly operate the EastLake Library ends on June 30, 1996. Library
staff is recommending that the contract be continued for another three year
period. The Library Board of Trustees are scheduled to vote on their
recommendation to City Council at their December 6, 1995 meeting.
The Library continues to plan for the construction of a 29,000 square foot
library to be built at the comer of H Street and Paseo Ranchero. This project is
designed to provide service to the SweetwaterlBonita Planning Area as called for
rl
~
in the Libraty Master {'Ian. However, since this project will be funded by
Library Development Impact Fees, it is now anticipated that the $9.5 million
needed for this project will not be collected until after the turn of the century.
During the last two review periods, the Growth Management Oversight
Commission has made two suggestions. One is to examine the impact of new
technologies on future library service delivery (vis-a-vis the threshold standard)
and the second is to update the Library (along with Police and Fire) facility
Master Plans.
The Library has made considerable efforts to upgrade its technology during the
last 18 months. Frame relay now connects all three libraries, Wide Area and
Local Area Networks have been installed, and many reference sources are now
being provided via a cd-rom network. Access to the Internet is scheduled for
installation in February 1996 with public access being provided by late Spring.
Also, coming in Spring, the Library will move to online document delivery for
periodical indices as well as full text retrieval.
At this time, the trend seems to be towards increased automation of reference
and research services, with no expectation of automating or digiziting dIe vast
number of books available for recreational and personal use. Additionally, for
the foreseeable future at least, the public library will continue to be a primary
access point to much of dIe information found via new technologies. A recent
study by the Institute for the Future, conducted for the California State Library,
found that in 1995:
-,
Only 25% of households had both a computer and modem.
Minority students are less likely to have a computer at home
( 10% for African-American and Hispanic students vs. over 40% for
White students).
Low-income students are less likely to have computers at home.
Therefore, library space must still be allocated for the pc workstations neccessary
for many members of the community to access the information super highway.
Since the public library will continue its historic role as the "people's university",
it would be imprudent, at this time, to adjust (or decrease) the threshold of 500
square feet of library per 1,000 population. However, technological changes are
occurring with lightening speed and this issue should be monitored annually.
The Library also recommends that the Library Master Plan be updated in FY
1997-98 using Public Facility Development Impact Fees to fund the update.
This timing would be appropriate in light of the need to make a determination
as to whether or not to utilize the proposed donate site at EastLake Village
Center for a permanent library no later than June 30, 1998.
-.
.'j.
-.
....
1\ooc;-r<O\)C f
MEMORANDUM
November 29, 1995
File No. 0790-80-KY-043
TO: Growth Management Oversight Commission
VIA: Sid Morris, Assistant City Manager ~
FROM: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public worv r
SUBJECT: Chula Vista Compliance with the Threshold Standards for Sewers and Drainage
In accordance with the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program, we have prepared
the following report regarding sewer and drainage threshold standards.
Sewer
No significant instances of established thresholds for sanitary sewers being exceeded as a result
of new growth in the City occurred during 1995. City design standards for sewers limit the flow
in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50% full and to 75% full for sewers larger than 12". The City
has also allowed flow up to 75% full in 8", 10" and 12" diameter sewers if it has been shown that
ultimate development has already occurred.
...
Willdan Associates completed the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing
Plan in July, 1992. This plan estimated existing and ultimate sewage flows, recommended
necessary improvements to the sewerage system, and determined fees to create funding for these
improvements. The City Council approved the plan in October, 1992 and established a Sewer
Development Impact Fee of $184 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for new construction in the
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin. This fee will pay the proportionate share of the cost of upgrading
the sewer system to handle the sewage generated by new developments which flow into the
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin. An amended plan incorporating pumped flows from EastLake
and Salt Creek Ranch Developments not within the basin and additional projected flows from the
Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center was completed in June, 1993. The City Council approved
the amended plan in March 1994 and established a fee of $560 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for
flows pumped from out-of-basin developments. During the later portion of Fiscal Year 1995-96,
the Engineering Division will review the fees established by the July 1992 and June 1993 reports.
Land use changes in the developments within the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin and the out-of-
basin areas contributing pumped flows will be reviewed to determine if the required facilities will .
change and the fees should be adjusted.
The Proctor Valley Road Sewer was constructed in 1992 to serve the Salt Creek I, Salt Creek
~,
--,
GMOC
-2-
November 28, 1995
Ranch, Rancho San Miguel, and Bonita Meadows developments, as well as other adjacent parcels.
This line is connected to the County's Frisbie Trunk Sewer. A Trunk Sewer Usage Agreement
is currently being prepared for the use of capacity within that line by the City.
Construction of a major sewer project in the Palm Canyon area was completed in April 1995 at
a cost of $164,000. The original 8 inch sewer was replaced with a 12 inch diameter sewer to
provide adequate capacity in the area. In order to avoid future problems in the existing facilities
downstream from Orange A venue, a special manhole was constructed to split the sewage flow into
two systems. One half of the sewage continues to flow in the original system (Jade Avenue to
Hilltop Drive), while the remainder is being diverted to Loma Lane and Walnut Drive. The sewer
systems ultimately flow into the Main Street trunk sewer line which has adequate sewer capacity
to handle these flows. The replacement of the sewer main, which was funded through the Sewer
Replacement Fund (226), was constructed in order to increase the sewer capacity and to
accommodate the existing flows, not due to new development.
A major sewer project is included in the CIP for FY 1995-96 for the reconstruction of sewers
under Bonita Road between 1-805 and Plaza Bonita Road. $56,500 was funded from the Sewer
ReplacemeIit Fund to pay for this project. The existing 18 inch trunk sewer segment is split into
four 8 inch sewer mains under Bonita Road, and at this point sewage debris occasionally becomrs
caught, causing sewage to back up. This sewer segment under Bonita Road is on the monthly
critical maintenance list. Additional flows at this location from new development and the
abandonment of two sewage pump stations in the Rice Canyon Sewer Basin are expected to result
in additional maintenance problems and cause the sewer capacity at this restricted location to be
exceeded. Again, the need for this project does not result from new development.
.-.
. The City is using several methods, as discussed below, to identify and determine the causes of
peak flows exceeding City standards in existing sewers:
1. The Engineering Division will continue to meter potential problem sites in the city with
the use of portable sewer monitoring meters. The Telegraph Canyon and Poggi Canyon
Sewer Basins are monitored to determine the impact of flows from the eastern
developments to the western Chula Vista sewer system. This monitoring program will
determine when or if future upgrades to the existing sewer system will be needed.
2.
The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor suspected problem sites in
order to determine whether the condition of the sewer lines has affected the flow. An
additional 54,320 linear feet of sewer lines were televised during 1995 for Phase VII of
the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. There were no major problems with the sewers in the
areas that were televised. The TV inspection crew will be concentrating their efforts on
the Montgomery area during 1996. The design of the Phase VI Sewer Rehabilitation
Program is complete. It is anticipated that the contract will be awarded and construction
.-...
r I
. I
GMOC
-3-
November 28, 1995
will be completed during FY 1995-96. The Phase VI contract includes the liDing of 1,840
lineal feet and replacement of 210 lineal feet of sewer mains and the lining or replacement
of 4 manholes.
3. The August 1990 Wastewater Master Plan prepared by Engineering-Science includes an
analysis of current and projected future flows for all City trunk lines and provides
recommendations for construction of new and upgraded sewers and preliminary cost
estimates. As indicated above, the City's monitoring and TV inspection programs are used
to keep the Master Plan information current.
4. A developer-funded sewer study of the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin is planned and should
be completed during FY 1995-96. The study will determine what improvements will be
needed in the basin and the mechanism which will be used to fund the construction of
improvements.
Sites identified through the above methods may be considered for inclusion in the Capital
Improvement Program or the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. New developments are required to
share in the estimated cost of building new sewers needed to serve their projects through the
payment of impact fees.
San Diego Metropolitan Sewerage System
The Average Daily Flow (ADF) of wastewater into the Metro Sewerage System during the first
half of FY 1995-96 was approximately 11.198 million gallons per day (mgd). This included
9.267 mgd of metered flows discharged directly to the Metro sewer line and 1.931 mgd of
metered and non-metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley Outfall Sewer.
The City's existing sewage capacity reservation (including Montgomery) with Metro is 19.2 mgd.
The Engineering Science Master Plan contained a curve of projected wastewater flows based on
historic data. According to this curve, the City would reach the 19.2 mgd level by the year 2000.
However, the Average Daily Flow obtained in the last three years has not followed this curve.
The flows have decreased as a result of water conservation measures and a slower pace of new
construction. Our estimate of the flow discharged to the Spring Valley Sanitation District
decreased due to the use of actual metering results instead of an Equivalent Dwelling Unit count.
Our current estimates indicate that the City flow will reach the capacity reservation with Metro
by 2010.
The San Diego Area Wastewater Management District has been disbanded largely due to the
inability of the City of San Diego and the Metro agencies to agree on a Memorandum of
Understanding for the District. Several agencies (excluding Chula Vista) are now involved in an
arbitration process to resolve the amount of money used to construct Clean Water Program
, i
'_J
~
GMOC
-4-
November 28, 1995
facilities which is legitimately billable to the participating agencies. Since the District has been
dissolved, all Metro and Clean Water Program facilities will be owned and operated by the City
of San Diego.
The City of Chula Vista is currently involved in discussions with the City of San Diego regarding
Chula Vista's responsibility to participate in the funding of construction and maintenance of
wastewater transportation and treatment and water reclamation facilities other than the original
Point Loma treatment plant. The extension of the 1960 Sewage Disposal Agreement will be part
of these discussions. Should these discussions break down, Chula Vista may enter into arbitration
proceedings.
The City's projection of growth during 1996 has not yet become available. Consequently, we have
not yet requested verification from Metro that adequate capacity in that system will be available
to serve that growth. Based upon our recent history and the amount of remaining unused capacity
in the Metro system we believe that the city still has more than adequate capacity for the next
several years.
A proposed 6 mgd Otay Valley Water Reclamation Plant was originally included as part of the
Clean Water Program with a proposed start-up date of 1998. The City of San Diego subsequently
decided to indefinitely postpone work on all water reclamation plants in the Clean Water Program
other than the North County facility and the South Bay Water Reclamation Facility (which is
located next to the International Treatment Plant). Various options for fmancing, constructing and
operating an Otay Valley plant are being considered, but no decisions have yet been made.
~
Draina2e
No major problems can be attributed to new growth/development in the City during calendar year
1995. One reason for this is that developers east of Interstate-805 have constructed detention
basins. Detention basins are designed to impound the additional volume of runoff created by new
development and to release that additional runoff at a controlled rate over an extended period of
time such that loo-year pre-development peak flow rates are not increased.
Each new subdivision is required to construct drainage facilities to handle storms of 10 to 100
year magnitudes, depending on the type of facility and size of drainage basin. In 1994 1160
building permits for dwelling units were issued. In 1995 (through November 17, 1995),
approximately 518 building permits for dwelling units have been issued. .Most of these permits
were issued for new construction in the Eastern Territories.
In addition to the construction of drainage facilities, developers must obtain National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Activit) permit coverage for each
development that disturbs an area of five acres or more or is part of a common plan of
..-.
GMOC
-5-
November 28, 1995
development or sale that will disturb an area of five acres or more. This permit program requires
a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan is specifically developed for each
construction site in order to prevent pollutants, including silt, from reaching drainage ways. The
NPDES Construction Activity permit is issued by the State Water Resources Control Board
(SWRCB) and is administered and enforced by the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB). The City does not administer or enforce any of the NPDES Construction Activity
permit provisions or regulations. The City is, however, required to ensure that all pertinent
provisions of the City's Grading Ordinance relating to drainage ways, erosion and siltation control
are enforced.
Developers are also required to dedicate land and to construct drainage facilities necessary to
serve their proposed developments. Drainage facilities benefitting an extensive area with multiple
owners may be financed through the establishment of assessment districts.
,-
Ordinance No. 2384 established a fee of $3,922/acre for new development in the Telegraph.
Canyon Creek Drainage Basin to fund improvements in Telegraph Canyon Creek east and west
of Interstate-80S. Only the segment of the channel between Hilltop Park and Fourth Avenue and
the segment of the channel between Halecrest Drive and the west side of Interstate-80S remain
deficient. A capital improvement project for the design of the channel between Hilltop Park and
Fourth Avenue has been funded from fees collected under Ordinance 2384. It should be noted that
the channel segment between Halecrest Drive and the west side of Interstate-80S is deficient
because the culvert under the freeway was designed by CalTrans in the late 1960s to convey only
the flows existent at that time, not the ultimate development flows. The freeway was completed
in the mid 1970s. The improvement of these segments of Telegraph Canyon Creek will be funded
primarily by fees collected as provided by Ordinance 2384 as development within the Otay Ranch
occurs.
A conceptual development plan for Sectional Planning Area One (SPA One) of Otay Ranch
proposes grading that will decrease the total areas of Telegraph Canyon Basin and Wolf Canyon
Basin by 0.18 square miles and 0.03 square miles, respectively, and increase the drainage area
of Poggi Canyon Basin by 0.21 square miles. In addition, Otay Ranch proposes to construct
detention facilities in Telegraph Canyon Channel and in Poggi Canyon Channel in order to reduce
lOO-year peak flow rates to ~ pre-development levels, thereby mitigating potential impacts
upon downstream drainage facilities. The following is based upon a table in the Otay Ranch SPA
One Master Drainage Plan.
'I i!
, vi.
~
GMOC
-6-
November 28, 1995
Basin Area, sq. mi. tOO-Year Peak Runoff Rates, c.r.s.
~ . . Existing Developed Existing Developed w/DetentioD
Telegraph Canyon 3.73 3.55 1,725 1,777 1,446
Poggi Canyon 3.29 3.50 1,527 2,029 1,306
It must be noted that the reduction of tOO-year peak runoff rates through Otay Ranch to below
pre-development levels will also reduce the cost of correcting downstream drainage deficiencies
in both the Telegraph Canyon Channel and the Poggi Canyon Channel.
As a condition of development, the Broadway Plaza (WaIMart) project has completed drainage
channel improvements along the project's southerly boundary between Fifth Avenue and
Broadway. Improvement of this channel has eliminated a "bottleneck" in the Sweetwater River
Minor Tributary and will alleviate upstream flooding problems. A small segment of the channel
immediately upstream of Eucalyptus Park (at "C" Street west of Fourth Avenue) still requires
additional study.
-
A number of drainage projects were recently completed as planned for in the City's Capital
Improvement Program (CIP). In Fiscal Years 1991-92, 1992-93, 1993-94 and 1994-95, seven
drainage improvement projects were completed at an approximate cost of $3,000,000. These
projects were:
In Sierra Way between Broadway and Colorado,
In Oxford Street between Second Avenue and Del Mar Avenue,
Guatay Channel north of Naples Street, Hilltop Drive to 770 feet east,
In Crested Butte Street between Broadway and Welton Street,
Telegraph Canyon Channel Repair, east of Paseo Del Rey,
Central Drainage Basin, West of Broadway and South of "G" Street,
In Broadway, from Telegraph Canyon Channel South to Crested Butte Street.
The current CIP includes two approved projects that will correct major drainage channel
deficiencies in two locations. Both of these projects are currently in the design phase. One
project will alleviate flooding problems in the Central Drainage Basin from Second A venue
upstream to "H" Street and will cost approximately $265,000. The full amount for this project
has been appropriated using Storm Drain Fee revenues, which are intended primarily for storm ~
drain maintenance and the development and implementation of storm water pollution prevention
programs. Construction is currently scheduled to commence in FY 1996-97. Another drainage
t .
GMOC
-7-
November 28, 1995
facility will be included as part of the reconstruction project for Main Street, between Industrial
Boulevard and Broadway. This drainage facility will cost at least $750,000 and will be
constructed with TransNet funds, which may only be used for the improvement of roadways and
appurtenant facilities. Full construction funding for this project is currently scheduled for FY
1997-98.
It should be noted that none of these projects were needed for the correction of conditions created
by new development.
A list of future drainage projects that Engineering staff will propose for inclusion in the FY 1996-
97 to FY 2000-01 CIF is enclosed as Exhibit "A". These projects are listed in order of priority,
based upon a May 1992 report to the City Council which identified drainage problems and
deficiencies throughout the City. It should be noted that almost all of the drainage facilities
identified by Engineering staff as deficient in the May 1992 report were constructed before the
development of basin-wide drainage studies and prior to the implementation of land development
controls by the City.
Because the City does not have a dedicated funding source for general drainage improvement
projects, the projects listed in Exhibit "A" will need to compete with other projects for scarce CIF
funds. Possible funding sources include Community Development Block Grant, State Gas Tax,
TransNet, Residential Construction Tax, Storm Drain Revenue Funds, and General Funds.
The 1994-95 storm season was relatively mild and no significant problems were reported. In fact,
very linle flooding, erosion, siltation, or damage was reported along the City's drainage ways in
this period. The construction of new drainage facilities by the City and by private developers in
1993, 1994 and 1995 has reduced the potential for future flooding and flooding hazards in both
the newer and older areas of the City of Chula Vista.
In its last report and recommendations to the City Council, the Growth Management Oversight
Commission (GMOC) expressed concern over the possibility that development within the eastern
portion of Chula Vista could impact existing drainage facilities west of Interstate-805.
Consequently, in its report to the City Council, the GMOC recommended that the City Council
direct Engineering staff to evaluate and report back to the City Council and the GMOC on where
proposed monitoring stations would be most effective. The purpose of such an evaluation is to
prepare a work program and CIF for implementing the monitoring stations in the future. In
response, the City Council directed Engineering staff to evaluate the appropriateness of, and
potential location for, suggested monitoring stations in the vicinity of Interstate-805, and to
include preliminary results of those evaluations in this report.
On June 27, 1995 the City Council passed Resolution 17939 approving FY 1995-96 Capital
Improvement Program appropriations. One of the projects approved is the installation of a stream
{ ; I
'-1 ,,/"
-,
GMOC
-8-
November 28, 1995
flow gauge in the Telegraph Canyon Channel at Fifth Avenue. The purpose of this stream flow
gauge is to determine actual channel flows for the purpose of analyzing a number of problems in
the downstream reaches of the Telegraph Canyon Basin, particularly the south branch of the basin.
Information obtained from the gauge will help to identify the most cost-effective solutions for
these problems with a high degree of confidence, but is too far downstream from Interstate-80S
to provide the information desired by the GMOC.
Engineering staff has determined that the installation of additional stream flow gauges in the
Telegraph Canyon and Poggi Canyon Channels in the vicinity of Interstate-80S is feasible.
However, stream flow data collection must be performed in conjunction with the collection of
rainfall data. Rainfall gauges have been installed at Fire Station No.2 and at City Hall.
It should be noted that drainage from Poggi Canyon affects only a small portion of the City
between Interstate-80S and the confluence of the Poggi Canyon Channel with the Otay River.
Engineering staff has identified one potential monitoring site in the Poggi Canyon Channel
upstream of Interstate-80S in the vicinity of Valle Lindo School. This site was chosen because
the channel is uniform and accessible at this location.
We also believe that the inclusion of a stream flow monitoring station in the Telegraph Canyon
Channel Wcl q be a worthwhile addition to the Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF program.
Possible lo(;a~bns for this station include the concrete-lined channel west of Nacion Avenue or
the concrete-lined channel upstream of Paseo del Rey. These sites were chosen because the
channel is uniform and accessible at these locations.
-,
The estimated cost to install each stream flow monitoring station is $25,000. Operation and
.maintenance costs will be about $5,000 per year per monitoring station. Engineering staff will
propose a project for inclusion in the FY 1996-97 Capitallmprovement Program to acquire and
install one monitoring station in Telegraph Canyon Channel and one monitoring station in Poggi
Canyon Channel in FY 1996-97. Staff will propose that the monitoring station in Telegraph
Canyon Channel be funded using Telegraph Canyon DIF funds. Possible funding sources for the
monitoring station in Poggi Canyon Channel include Storm Drain Revenue Funds and General
Funds.
Reduced copies of maps showing the outlines of all the sewer and storm drainage basins within
the City's Sphere of Influence will be attached to copies of the report provided to GMOC
members.
cc:
Ed batchelder, Senior Planner
.-
eM: IHOME\ENGINEER\GMOC96.REP)
-
-
<
-
-
~
~
~
~
==
~
~
,""-
c.:>
Z
-
E--
V)
-
....J
V)....J
0<
1.lJ-
1.lJE--
Z~
o~
I.lJ
OV)
ZE--
~u
~1.lJ
Z.....
~~
~Q..
OI.lJ
>-c.:>
~<
<Z
:E-
:E~
~o
V)>-
E--
-
~
o
C2
Q..
,b S b a
:;; "" "" "" .E 12~oo'
~ 13 ~ ~ ~."[
~ S( 0 0 ~ 00 O\~.
~ ; go ~ ~ ~it~
0....; 0.. Q. Q.. ~ 0\... 0..
~ is.~ .~ .~ Q.. t;: ~ e
~ '2' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
]~:g :g :g :g .E [~
..:g..a ..a ..a ..a ~8=
~ 8.~ .~ .~ .g ~ .~ '5
oct) u u u Q.~5
20255 5
VJ '" VJ II> f,fJ fI) .~ :.s ;g
=0= = = = ~..as
:l S U;i 8 8 S 8 .- = ...
I: -g '''8 .12 .12 ''8 .~ 0.E
CIol ",S; ",S; ~S; ~~ ",S;..a'il~
E c-' c-" c-' c-' C-' c 5 ~
E !!P ~ .!!P ~ .!!P ~ .!!P S; .!!P ~ .!!P VJ S(
c ~>-::l>o::l>o::l>o::l>o ::ls= E
u ;.J ~ 0 t.., 0 t.., 0 t.., C'H.I. 0 Cl.
~ ~ ~ ~
...
.E
8~ ~~ ~
~&l ]~l 1
iiOit... oitE ...
0\ ... c.. 0... c.. Co.
.~ ~ J2 .~ ~ ~.~ .~
f ~H ~H f
.~ ~.22 .g &..22 .g .~
u c..cou [c.cu u
5 VJ:65 ",:65 5
II> .- C VJ .- C fI) CI>
= 1>Il..a = 1>Il..a = =
8 .5 S .5 8 S
12 .'8512 ."g512.)2.
~ ~ ..a 'il ~ 8 ..a 'il ~ 0 ~ 0
=-=2=-=2=-=-
.!!P ~ .!!P 1;; .!!P ~ .!!P 1;; .!!P 8 .!!P 8
"'>0 VJ = VJ>o '" = "'>- VJ>o
ot..,oSot..,o8ot..,ot..,
~ g. ~-!
- = € '" ~ ~~ ~
~ ~ x 8 ~ ~ ~~s ~
= ~ --~ 0 0 oU~ E 13
~ . ~~~- ~ ~ o~.> 0 ~
u '=8-0 ' - _~c .t:~~
~E~~=~- ~ 8_S"Eo 'e~
1>Il~=<~~~ ~ ~R .ogo .5~0
~-e"'~2- c 8~~~~ ~<-
~~~~s~~ ~ -~"Eo~ ~
;::. ;:J 0 .c. .- '" = 0 '~o' x ~:E ~
~ ..._.c~~ ...i;'~1l""~' ;E~
:; ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 lEi 0 fi .5 "i ~ E
~~-oS~E -=E~' ~~ eS-
~S~~~~~ ;~~~~~~ ~...~
CIol 1;;~~~" ~ C!"'oSeo; .;:;~~
- C ::I .-::1 ... =: u .- .c ... _ =: C/) 1:'-"
= ~il fi ~ fi .~. is I! ~ ~ l! ~ e "5 ~ 0 ': ~
~~>o>...o~_o~_"'U-_'CZB=
~ ~ < .. < 0 Vi > ::l .. 0 .. ~ .. .. .. 0 .. ... ~
.OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ e- &i < ~ S! ~ ~"E ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! <
C' ~ = , S ~ > "E 1I:l .' >'-.E'-'- , :s ' l!:E
tc5~~~5~~~5~o~~~~~~~
~ .
i ! ~
-
~
8
&:
~ 8 ~
~ ~
"C
go&:
I-
Q,
~~~
~ j
~ &:
CIol
III
&.~~
c .....
~ ~
&:
~~
&:
~~
~ ~
III
~
i
u
~
~~~
~
~
~
~
~~~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~~s
v) v-) 00
NO~
..., -
...,
o
lA
~
g
~
~
8
N
...,
~
~
~
~~~
00
- 'I'l
..., ...,
~
g
N
lA
~
~
~
~
'I'l
...,
~~~
~
g
N
lA
~
g
~
~
8
N
...,
~
~
'I'l
...,
~
g
;;;
~~~
V;trloO
.., 'I'l \C
...,;;;~
N
<
'I'l
~~r--
..,
"It
13
;;
13
.c
b!
~
~
.,;
N
~
~
o
~
~
~
~
'I'l
\C
~
00
~
~.
~
...,
~
~
~
~.
'I'l
s:
...,
0\
~
.,;
~
-
lA
~
.,;
N
N
lA
~
~
~
~
~
...
..
>
ii!
S-
o
S
"i
o
~
g
c;;
>
g
~
~
<
e
~
s:
~
o
00
..,
...,
~
~
~
~
~
o
00
..,
lA
f
='
:'1
&i
='
=
~ '~
~ ~ e
rl .. 41
.- i E ~
~E~"'"
~~e13
fi:"~S
E:--~
f.) ~ ~"52
e 0 l1! lil
Q,.s .- _
E ::> I! rl
-~o~
~s.;..: c
~-"'8
.~ ~ ~ !
o~o..8
!::;
8
'I'l
~
lA
~
~
~
~
8
'I'l
~
N
lA
~
'E
..e
..
o
~
8
III
~
to-
~
~
iii'
III
~
~
g
<Ii
III
to-
~
~
g
to-
~
~
~
N
00
~
is
III
~
.-i
<I'}
~
-<
~
~
]
~
'"
=
o
U
...
i
13
~
=
l!
~
>
'"
.c
..
.s
~
u
.~
e
Cl.
c
~
'"
~
&
~
'"
l>ll
=
:;;;l
=
;2
C;-
'1:
o
'1:
Cl.
.5
'"
Q.
'"
~
'u
=
='
o
U
C;-
U
$a
t:
&
~
~
g
41
'u
lJ:
~
41
if
r::
'f]
o
~
D
~
~
i
::>
x
~
Q
~
l:l
'"
..
6
ffi
~
~
~
~
>.
'"
~
=
8-
;:J
1
~
I>Il
~
C;-
'C
o
J:
*
....
....
~
....
....
~
~
=
~
=
><
~
c::
~~
llitIJ
~tI)o
~~~
~>
tI)~
e,:,
It')
~
0\
it
c::
~~
~~O\
u~~
....Jc..
~~
c..
--
tIJ
o
<
Z
~
o
o
~
c::
~
tJ.J
en
"-'
tIJ
o
<00
ZN
-\0
~
o
~
te
b
<
c..
~
-
~
tJ.J
~
c..
9
~
tIJ
Q
~
en
:>
:5
:J
o
(.t..
o
~
u
c::
z~
~tIJ
~enl'
u~~
....J>
~~
e,:,
''It
~
-
o
~
o
~
~ ~
o
~
~
-
~
l%l
o
fJl"}
~"lt000
~ -
\0
rxS
00
.....
0\
N'
-
fJl"}
000000
Nt"-
000
~N~
~
0\
~
~~
N
V'l
fJl"}
--
"ltO\NOO
V'l000\
00000
OO~o\
V'l ~ ''It
- "-'
8
r--
V'l~
~
fJl"}
--
NOO-OO
0\V'l~
r-- \0 V'l
oN''''';
N "-'
en ~
~ ~
~ 5~
~ ~~ en ~~
~ ~~
tIJ C::tIJ
~11~i
r--
~
rxS
fJl"}
\0
.....
00
O\~
''It
fJl"}
8
V'l
~
V'l
\0
fJl"}
0\
.....
\0
r--~
V'l
fJl"}
V'l
~
0\
~
e,:,
~
ffi
~
~
--.
~
...
~
~
VJ
"'0
~
c..
e
='
c..
c
~
c
~
.c
c..
cu
...
if
~
bl)
c
'>.
cu
c..
"-'
o
='
~
-.
c
.-
>.
-
o
~
.c
-
.c
-
.~
"'0
~
-
.-
"-'
c
]
~
.c
:i
~
u
"-'
o
...
~
-
'is
-
c
.-
5-
~
~
~
~ .~
..... "
~J
~ ~
~ ~.
o ..
Z ~
;
~r
.. -
rsfJl"}
-
o .
Z-
!U I
,
I
~><: .:
..
.
...
... ~ ::
i - ,~
- ..
~ ..
.. -
, - -
.. ""
.. "" ..
=- ~ ~
I-~
!:
", ~7"
111'\' .,'
"j. ~
f ~ ~
= :. I
.. .. ~
...
- .
~ ~ .a
a - ..
.: ..
}
,
,
I
."""..
.
.
.
l
,
.
.
~
!
i
I
z
~.....
"'<
t't>
....0
.........
t::O
Q.)('j
("I')
_ .. ::::r-
=c:
("I') -
~
-<
V')
.....
~
.
-
...
. ...--
I
I
=- I
" I
I
I
I
,
!
i
I
j
i
"' I
I
,
\
!
I
I
rd'
! ."'\:
c'- ..!,
,
I'i. ~, " ~ ~ ~~\'
I ," ~C\ w; ~ ;;, J..." I:' I:' 0
.Lv.,j- I~. ~ ~~~\' \"'If( ~ t: r ~ ' .... - -
tf ..l ~ ~\ ~'?1 '1\- z:- a-~" A> A> ......
ll.. ;j ~~:'6~ \v;l:"~~,:r~~~\ ~~/~, '!! ll.~~ P' -.-.
...... ~ ~f>l\.. ~~~ ~ ::::::J =
~ -= J\'~~\~,L~~5'~;'tiJ( I' - ...... ("')
<,1~I~~ ~;;;\c.v- iI..\I" ~11\. ~~ ~ 'L I.ClI.Cl :::r
(l _ ~'" ~ ~ '\ ~ ~..<II \ \:;.Ill "- \.\.-.-. '/r~\ t't> t't> c:
I -' ,".-c- ~ ~ \ ,\18. ,"-" ' '''tIi,;J'r" ~ '~~ t -
"';11111 d-b~~~ ~!!~~-\' ;;A~'~~~~ - ('"") -== ~
..H'h IImmSSI ?" 1yU ;< 'J ,~~ Ihr =r ...
rI- JI 11111 mTIC ~ \'''' ~ Co i: ,:;, ~~ ~J ~ r\ ~,L ... '"
IT l~ ~~ -=-'\<' A'-< "I:Jl'f)Y;;J \,.,\( ~~ ::::::J -. -<
-1l IT >-V "\' ~ -::::;It', - '" """ -"1'''''- ~ ,.... '"
I .,:~~=:.: -= \01-', ~~ 'C-~ --1"7)'~ ~~ \-:~~\SY1l~~ :: ~ --
~ ~ i-\\\\~ V-~ \\~ ~" ~~... \.. ~~ \ '\ .,~ .... (,I)
"'":. :;;r' ,f' \\~~t;;~ IF.'2:: L:i ~~ - A> ......
*. ~'~ .'~ \.., "~A' ~ -.~ > '" c>>
;_ ,[C II ~~I[, 'iffi~" u:; ~ r!/. ~~Q-" ~
r;i ~ ~ "- l%;~m I \. -~ q: or ,,\
r- >"..... ~~'E;;,l(;>'" ,~ ~ \, --Oi~~':;:'
. --. -, ~1~ ,"\11:::'1 1:rN~;rz4/\ -Ei[~~.. ( ~
1 L:c;;~ ,~; 't ~ ~\,*f. :1 ( , · \~ -., '\-"~
: _"'_, ~":l i )~~ I ~ rr;,..TJ - \
-" -i e,.' .- , ~ ..,~~~~~ \ z, )jpt,fll~ "
1 r7 I -'~ '. ,~~-;;J k~ I ,~j1!'1 ~ · --: -,
. n u'''~' ',) \ tt ~'~~:~~J.j. ~ \ ) ~
11 \. ~vti, ~ -j~ ~
E: E~ ,,~ l"~" ~} ~~ c~~ I
;:: .~;~ '\ \~\ ~~~~ \\ ' .2 JI' 1 z; I
; I; '. .' ~\1 ~: ;::.". ::: 1
~ ) ~ "I (l~(I --I., - ~ ~
, \ ~~l v':;v ~,
_ ::-:~ 1, ~ j
i J '- ~
~--, ~;;-':.n ~ ~ f Uoc:.
\ ~~j<'- ~--
, ,- *- - .-t.-l-......
I " (, -~ -/' L'-
.______.__. ;-0 ./- -~ ...-
_. _~.___../ J
EO .' :: -- '
;;: <",,/"', r . I
O-c ~ ~ __.A... .', . r
\~~;r~ [
--. --,.
.
.
EO
--0
z.
O-c
-
-
-0-
_c
-...
.-
c:
. -0
.
>....~~. -
_ . 4C. ...... <iii; . -c
! i! ~ t!
:!-: ;. ...
~:.1' i !...i
;. :;. :,.1' ._ :.
J: .:
. . ;-
E' i i ~
i .. t :
. :- [
~$_.~
(;~ ~ I'f
~=::: ::1 E=
.-:!' -...
:'.;,:' :.~ !.:.
=~..! :: ::
:z.::: ... . 'I 'I
.. :--1) ~
--i~ 'ii~ p
t!:l. i H E
J
,
.....
I!..-- "~.. I
Hay 20, 1992
File No. KY-181
KY-100
FROM:
Supplemental Budget Hemo No. ~
Budget Review Report
Council Referral No. 2569
Honorable Hayor and City Council
John D. Goss, City Hanager~ . .. ~
John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works~~
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT: Budget Supplemental Report for FY 93 Budget on Flooding
and Corrective Facilities
In February and Harch 1992, runoff resulting from a series of
storms created many areas of localized flooding within the City.
Many private properties, including residences, were flooded. Low-
lying streets and intersections were impassable for periods of time
following the passage of higher intensity rain cells.
The City Counci 1 directed staf f to prepare a report on this
flooding and to include proposalS for construction of drainage
facilities to correct drainage deficiencies.
The attached report has been prepared in compliance with that
direction.
Several drainage deficiency studies have been performed for the
City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego (for the Montgomery
area) from 1964 to 1988. Discussion of these studies is included
in the attached report.
Engineering staff has now determined that 71 projects identified in
all of the previous drainage def iciency studies remain to be
constructed. Engineering staff has identified an additional 13
projects to correct known drainage de~iciencies; staff also
identif ied two more projects (one east of Eucalyptus Park and
another in the vicinity of Peppertree Drive), but time has not
allowed the preparation of preliminary designs or estimates.
The 1992 cost to construct the 84 projects (excluding the two
mentioned above) is estimated at '23,025,000. Considering an
estimated inflation rate of 4' per year, uniform funding of
$1,695,000 per year would be required for 20 years to fund these 84
improvements. Because of the magnitude of this sustained level of
funding, it seems apparent that a 20-year program of construction
is n~t achievable.
. ~
Honorable Mayor & City Council
Page 2
May 20, 1992
......"
Staff has prepared a revised, updated list of projects in order of
relative importance (see Exhibit "B" of the attached report). The
priorities are based upon the seriousness of each problem, the cost
to relieve it, and the hazard presented. This list represents a
current value of $13,561,000 in drainage projects; a schedule of
construction is not included.
Of the projects on this priority list, approximately $6,500,000 is
required for improvements to Telegraph Canyon Creek, from Hilltop
Drive to west of Third Avenue. These improvements will be funded
by the Telegraph Canyon Basin Plan fund, which currently has a
balance of $120,000 with most of its future revenues coming as a
result of the development of Otay Ranch.
The current cost to construct the priority projects listed in
Exhibit "E" of the attached report is $13,561,000. Approximately
one-half of the required funding will be obtained from the
Telegraph Canyon Basin Plan fund. The remaining projects do not
have specif ic funding sources and will require annual uniform
funding of apprOXimately $520,000 per year for the next 20 years to
construct (assuming 4% per year inflation rate). These funds could
possibly be obtained from Community Development Block Grant, State
Gas Tax, TransNet, Storm Drain Fee, Residential Construction Tax,
and General Fund revenues.
-,
KPA/kpa
.-..
[A:FLOODREP.SUP)
REPORT ON FLOODING
AND PROPOSED CORRECTIVE FACILITIES
KAY 1992
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
-1-
, /
I
I.
BACKGROUND
......
In February and March 1992, Chula Vista was subjected to a series
of high intensity rainstorms. The resulting runoff created many
areas of local flooding in the City. Substantial numbers of
private properties, including resldences, were flooded with as much
as several feet of water. Many low lying streets and intersections
were rendered impassable for periods of time following passage of
higher intensity cells.
As of May 8, 1992, nineteen claims for damages resulting from
flooding problems in 1992 have been submitted to the City. Nine
claims by residents of apartments at 616 "G" st. total $17,740. An
additional claim by one more resident at that address is for an
unspecified amount. Two claims by residents in the vicinity of
Crested Butte Street and Woodlawn Avenue for aggregate damages of
$36,722 may represent one other problem location. The damage
claims related to the 1992 flooding amount to approximately $75,300
to date. Substantial time remains within which other claims may
also be submitted.
The City Council directed staff to prepare a report on this
flooding and to include proposals for drainage facilities leading
to the correction of drainage deficiencies where possible.
This report has been prepared in compliance with that direction.
II. RECOMMENDATION
-.
That Council accept this report and approve the alternative list
of projects shown in Exhibit "E" as the City's priority list of
drainage projects.
III. HISTORY
A special study of storm drainage facilities was prepared for the
City in 1964 by Lawrence, Fogg, Florer and Smith, Civil Engineers,
as a supplement to the City's General Plan. This study (the Fogg
study) identified 85 problem drainage areas and proposed facilities
for their correction. Anticipated drainage problems identified in
this report ranged from nuisance flooding of streets to flooding
resulting in property damage. As indicated in a staff report to
the City Council on April 2, 1985, the "Fogg study" has provided
the basis for much of the storm drain construction within the City
since it was adopted.
In January 1969, these engineers also prepared a "General Drainage
Plan for Metropolitan Area Zone 4" for the San Diego County Flood
Control District. This study covered the Montgomery Area and
-2-
.....
id~ntified additional drainage projects for what is now the City of
Ch~la Vista. Twelve of these projects remain to be constructed.
In a 1985 Engineering staff study, it was determined that 40 of the
85 projects proposed in the 1964 Fogg study remained to be
constructed at that time. In this 1985 study, staff identified 6
additional projects as being needed throughout the City to provide
adequate drainage and estimated that the cost to build the total 46
facilities would be $9,062,000. It was proposed that these
drainage facilities be constructed over a period of twenty years.
The Sweetwater River and the Telegraph Canyon Channel (downstream
froim a point between Third and Fourth Avenues) were among the
listed projects.
Of the 46 projects which were proposed in 1985, nine have been
constructed to date, five more are to be constructed in connection
with various street improvement projects in the FY 93 and FY 94
ClP's, and one is proposed for construction in the CIP for FY 93.
Construction of the Sweetwater River channel from I-80S to the bay,
which is part of the Route 54 project by CalTrans and the Army
corps of Engineers, is nearing completion. Chula Vista's cost for
this project has not yet been fully determined because of questions
related to reimbursement of project costs by the State of
California Department of Water Resources.
Since the 1985 report was submitted to Council, the City has spent
approximately $6,387,700 toward construction of the drainage
facilities which were proposed. Approximately twenty percent of
th~m have been completed, including Telegraph Canyon Creek from
abqve Fourth Avenue to San Diego Bay.. The cost to Chula Vista for
th~s project alone is $4,687,700 to date; however, the cost may
increase because of 1 it igation with the contractor. Addi tional
drainage improvements have been incorporated into street
improvement projects.
IV. CURRENT STUDIES
The City's General Plan was updated in 1988 and a further study of
drainage deficiencies was made at that time by Leedshill-
HeI1kenhoff, Inc.
This study identified 22 new projects (mostly in the Telegraph
Canyon basin) for relief of current drainage deficiencies. It also
identified an additional 42 drainage improvements to be constructed
in .connection with land development projects. These improvements
are not listed in this report because we anticipate they will be
constructed by developers. Districts for the funding of drainage
facility improvements may be established in the future as
-3-
development occurs; however, no drainage problems have been
identified in these basins at this time.
-
There presently are 71 drainage projects listed in the combined
Fogg and Leedshill-Herkenhoff studies which remain to be
constructed. Their total cost is estimated to be $21,285,000
(including 40% for design, inspection and contingencies), updated
to 1992 dollars. Exhibit "A" lists these projects and their costs.
A review of the calls and letters received as a result of recent
non-maintenance-related flooding in Chula Vista indicate that a
number of locations in the City experience drainage problems which
will not be corrected by the above 71 projects. We have also
prepared preliminary project descriptions and estimates for an
additional 15 projects, which have been identified in this current
effort and are listed for the first time; these projects are shown
on Exhibi t "B". Exhibits "c" and "D" are foldout maps showing,
respectively, (1) clusters of drainage complaints or problems which
have been made or identified to the City since 1983 and (2)
locations of the corrective drainage facilities shown in Exhibits
"A" and "B".
Construction of these corrective drainage facilities is estimated
to cost approximately $1,740,000 in 1992 dollars, bringing the
total to 84 projects and $23,025,000. Two more projects (one east
of Eucalyptus Park and the other in the vicinity of Peppertree
Drive) are also proposed, but time has not allowed the preparation
of preliminary designs or estimates.
-
Assuming an inflation rate of 4% per year, a uniform funding of
$1,695,000 per year would be required for the support of a 20 year
program for the construction of these projects. This compares to an
average expenditure of approximately $913,000 per year toward these
drainage projects since 1985. This annual amount of $913,000 is
skewed considerably by the inclusion of expenditures for
construction of the Telegraph Canyon Channel project and does not
include the Army Corps of Engineers' funds of $5,000,000; also,
some of the funds that the City "provided" for this project were
actually allocated from the discretionary funds of other agencies.
Because of the magnitude of this sustained level of funding, it
seems apparent that a 20 year program of construction for
completion of all the projects is not reasonably achievable.
V. PROPOSED PLAN
Many of the recent drainage complaints refer to nuisance situations
such as short term street flooding. Others concern more serious
situations such as interior flooding of homes and property damage.
-,
-4-
n
We have attempted to establish a priority list of projects based on
the seriousness of each problem and the cost to relieve it.
Priority and order of improvement were determined as follows:
1. Generally, downstream improvements are to be constructed
before upstream improvements in the same system to prevent the
worsening of downstream flooding as a result of improvement
efforts.
2. All nuisance street flooding (i.e., street flooding that was
not serious and/or does not present a significant hazard and
meet the requirements of Section V, Paragraph IV.F.l of the
City's Subdivision Manual) were eliminated from this list.
3. Any project costing less but providing greater benefits than
a larger or more expensive project is placed higher on the
priority list.
4. Primary drainage facilities have higher priority than
secondary facilities within any given basin.
On the basis of the above criteria, we have prepared a revised,
updated list of projects in order of relative importance, which
would relieve flooding in a majority of this year's problem areas,
for consideration. This list (Exhibit "E") represents a current
value of approximately $13,561,000 in storm drain projects and
identifles potential funding sources for each of the projects. It
does not include a schedule of construction. Multiple projects
shown with the same priority number (such as lOA, lOB and lOC) need
to be constructed as a single project. The priority list excludes
tho$e projects which are scheduled to be constructed in connection
with budgeted street improvement projects.
. The construction of a drainage channel for Telegraph Canyon is
discussed in the "Telegraph Canyon Basin Plan" report, prepared by
Willdan Engineering in 1991 in connection with the proposed
dev~lopment of EastLake Greens and Otay Ranch. This report
established a fee of $3922 per acre for land being developed; this
fee; is subject to an annual adjustment based upon the Engineering
New$ Record (ENR) Construction Cost Index. As development
progresses east of Interstate-80S, this fee will provide adequate
fun~ing for the construction of an improved channel from Hilltop
Drive to the upstream end of permanent facilities east of Fourth
Ave~'lUe; as shown in Exhibit "E", the estimated cost for the
construction of this channel is approximately $6.5 million (in 1992
dollars). This fee also provided funding for the improvement of
the!upstream reaches of Telegraph Canyon Channel, from the EastLake
development to Paseo Ladera by the City and developers; these
upstream improvements are now nearing completion. Only $120,000 is
-5-
I <-
presently available for completion of the channel segment from
Hilltop Drive to east of Fourth Avenue because credit was taken for
construction of the upstream reaches. Host of the future revenues
(approximately $6.4 million in 1992 dollars) will be coming from
development of Otay Ranch.
The remaining projects listed in Exhibit "E" do not have specific
funding sources and will require annual uniform funding of
approximately $520,000 per year for the next 20 years to construct
(assuming 4% per year inflation rate). These funds could possibly
be obtained from Community Development Block Grant, State Gas Tax,
TransNet, Storm Drain Fee, Residential Construction Tax, and
General Fund revenues. The potential funding sources for these
projects are as follows:
1. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) - 19 of the 37
projects identified in Exhibit "E" are in CDBG areas and can
potentially be funded in part or in total with CDBG funds.
2. State Gas Tax and TransNet - 29 of the 37 projects are either
within a roadway and/or will reduce roadway hazards by their
implementations, and can, therefore, potentially be funded in
part or in total with State Gas Tax and TransNet monies.
3.
Charter Point Deposit - The No. 1 priority project, which
involves the construction of downstream improvements in the
Central Basin and has been proposed for inclusion in the FY
1992-93 Capital Improvement Program, identifies Charter Point
funds as one of its potential funding sources. These funds
were originally given to the City by the developer of Charter
POlnt for the construction of infrastructure improvements
along Telegraph Canyon Road. However, because the Telegraph
Canyon Road project was set up to meet FAU requirements and
res tr ict ions, the City chose to replace the Charter Point
funds on this project with FAU funds, thereby releasing the
Charter Point funds for another project. These funds can only
be used for the funding of infrastructure improvements.
4. Storm Drain Fee - All of the projects can potentially be
funded with Storm Drain Fee revenues. The Storm Drain Fee was
established in July 1991 for the purpose of funding the
implementation of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (N.P.D.E.S. ) program, which has been mandated by state
and federal law. However, if the City Council wishes to use
this revenue source to fund drainage improvement projects,
then amendments to the Storm Drain Ordinance and the Haster
Fee Schedule are necessary in order to raise additional Storm
Drain Fund revenues, which are currently used solely to fund
the costs of implementing the H.P.D.E.S. program and
associated efforts. It must be noted that funding of the
-6-
....
-
....
!
N.P.D.E.S. program must take precedence over the funding of
drainage improvement projects because of the State and Federal
mandates to implement stormwater pollution control practices.
5. Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) -
Another potential source of funding for these projects may be
from the ISTEA. It is not yet known what restrictions and/or
limitations this funding source will have because this act was
recently approved by Congress and specific requirements are
not yet available.
6. Residential Construction Tax - This fund can be, and has been,
used for the construction of storm drain improvements and is
specifically classified as a capital project fund.
7. General Funds - These funds are the least restricted of the
potential funding sources and may be used for any public
purpose authorized by the City Council. However, these funds,
because they have fewer restrictions on their use, are also
the least available of the potential funding sources.
KPAII kpa
[A:FLOODREP.JPL]
-7-
(~
LIST OF EXHIBITS
-
1. Exhibit "A" - "Locations of Drainage Deficiencies within the
City of Chula Vista (Deficiencies as Identified in Fogg '64,
Fogg '69, and Leedshill-Herkenhoff Drainage Deficiency
Studies)"
2. Exhibi t "B" - "Additional Drainage Def iciencies in the City of
Chula Vista (As Identified by Engineering Staff, Hay 1992)
3. Exhibit "e" - "Drainage Complaints"
4. Exhibit "011 - "Location of Hissing Drainage Improvements"
5. Exhibit "E" - "Prioritized Drainage Deficiency List for the
City of Chula Vista"
6. Exhibit "F" - "Proposed Drainage Project Priority List"
7. Exhibit "G" - "Recorded Drainage Complaints -- 1983 to 1992"
(this list includes maintenance-related complaints and
duplicate or same day entries)
8.
Exhibit "H" - "Non-Maintenance Related Drainage Complaints and
Associated Deficiencies That Still Exist (As Identified in
Fogg '64, Fogg '69, Leedshill-Herkenhoff, and 1992 Staff
Drainage Deficiency Studies)"
-
.-..
-8-
r rl
,I,,'") \
-
:-
...
..
..
II(
w
w
...
- '"
'" ...
- -
>;
... ""
co
:::0
'"'
Co>
<:>
0=
~ -
~~
-7
~ ~
~
~
~co
::;
.
co
'" -
~c
Co> .
~::
~g
co _
..
.-
.a
.-
.c
N
1&1
~ .
'" .
c _
- -
;'"
"" '"
co~
<:> -
....
_ co
2~
- -
c
Co> -
~~
2
- -.
~: i ! ~ ~_ :~ ~ i i i!! =_-
I: _ . _en _411'I ..c....'" u..... _ c: _ ..... ~
Q: ~-_....:~:;;.:. - ." t::u. =~ C -.:..: C -:""'; i
o:~~:~~;:~~~~:i; ~~i Ii! _!~ !.; _ I:: ~_5i~l~
- ': c ~ - :: ~ - =.. - ~ = = _ ~ ~ .; ! c..: ~ i ! -= = .~ ~ _ .: a .E = -= = . u = -:; G.
:~~i:~::;~~~:;o= ~~u .~o: ~ ~e ~.=~ ~o= !;~~~~~
_~ 0=-::-";::- _-~~: "VI:; :~;;;fI _ 0" ..~~- :; ~- =U~_..:'';
- . .- _o~.. ....cO _ __ ou_O' a._O_U'W 0__"
~~ 000._0.0__000 ~~ _ _0" _ _ _~~_ __~ _~_~cc
ii~~5~=:~.S~~:~~~_-o~~!~~! ~~~: ~~:: !~~!~~!~=~~ ~E~
~~:;i!i~~O~~!;~:!~~~iii~~i~!~~i~li~i~~=~:!~~5:~i!:~
---..... ...... Ie ...... ""0 _. ..,... .. O"-"U :._ ..__.-J.__....O_O
.: .... ~ .. ~ ~ g :.w = c Wi . ~ :-"":- ~ .. = ~ 'r 0 -::- 0 -:; 0 Co.) -:- - ... 0 -= -: .. . -:: ::".: ..:J --. ..., ~ =:;; ~ .... ~
..-;.n ....;..w... .. ..Ii_ .. .. .. ..u .. .-::--= __u_-;: :.u_-c:;uu_~-~~..~ .:_:;;:: _ ..:00
...-_._.......--................_....~....c.... .... .. _. ........0
i;~:~~~~:=~:ii::::ii~i~i:::=~~:::~~::~~~~~~.:=.;~~~
:~~:i~~~:::5:~::::::!:I::::~~~:::~i::~~~~~~~:~i~.~~~
-~~~=~~~=~~=~~~~~=~~~_~~;~~~c~~~~!~==K~__=~~~~~=..2
..
..
i
Co>
-
-
-
-
......., ...
~~~~
-
-
~
-
-
~
--...
......
0000
......-
...
o
....
...
C>
C>
C>
co
oft
.....
-
oo_~
-~~~
0000
oooe
0000
...nO""'o
_..-s_:!
co
co
co
co
~
oft
-
~
co
~
...
~
Co>
-
~
-
~
co
... ...
Co> ... ...
"" Co>
Co> Co> ""
'0 "" ""
'0 '0 '0
~ C,
:;:: ~ <:>
"" -
.., ... "" ""
- :i ... .., ... :i
-
,,; Co> Co>
,,; "" i~ ...
- .. '0
.:!! .. .:!!
.~ C, .., c, ..,
c oft .- oft -
. - ... - ...
. .; ...
: ;; ;; c g .. ;;
~ 0 0 - - 0
... :i :i .. c ..,
~ - - .
. .:!! -; - -
-;:; .., -;:;
-: .. .- -
... - - - -
..,
i = -
- . - . -
'" ... ... ... ... ...
- .. .. c ~ .. ~
""
....
c
!;
Co>
~
~
...
...
""
..
o
..
..
~
.. -
'" !
.
-
- ~
.. -
-
..
- ..
..... ~
5 co -
.~
- i ..
oft -
-
i
.
e
-
.
~
o
-
- --
... --
~:~=
:,,:,,:n;
....~.... 0
. . . -
... .... Y'9 ..
...
=
o
~
...
...
-
I
:::
~
Co>
-
C>
,
-
en
co co
... ...
, ,
--
en ....
--
. .
. -
.. ..
.g.g
'.
-
.i
-
-
~
- -
--
00
--
....;-----.....~- ..
--..--------.--
..- - _.......-
..
--..........._...~--.:.-
=:'r::'Z':-:'~=Z'~:~
.........._.......~................J....
:=========ggg
ggggggggo:gog
000000003100 ..
Y'900~';OOO.ft":o "'"
"'o__o_~...._",.... ...
---- -....- ....
..:
-
....
""
""
.
..
co
C>
-
...
..
.
...
Co>
-
'0
...
Co>
co:
...
Co>
co:
..:
Co>
co:
-
-:;
- .
:.:-:
- ..
... 0-
c ~ ...
. ...
..ee_ 8
-"_CEO_
':i:__It..J-
- 0 0_0..
.~ "0 'C .$ ~
...""'0 _
.., - ~.
- .. .---
--v'O"O"'a.."'O'a ..
.. .::;=;::i;=~-:I
o 0 0 0 .,.-
-= -=___C_-=___"O
.. _____0_.._.
.. ----. .--....-
- -c:c:.-- -c:cu.
y _ y.-.-.- YO u.-.- c_
y - --
--~---....-....--~-
-------------
- - - - - - - - - - - .- -
---------.....,..
-------------
-"...."'....-"............
c c c c c c c c c c c _ c
-----------u-
'0
co
co
...
'0
'0
~
.."
oft
co
...
c
-
<:>
.."
- ...
..... co
A.A.A._
..1t..J C-J U
_lII:G:a:
- -
---- .
-000-
.. ..
.- 0 c, c. .-
... <:II .".,""-
co _ oft
..
.~
-
.
-
-
.
..
- -
... ..
--
::!:=
........ ~....
- - - -.:
_.- - -
_.,.....u
I ......
... --
-------------
-----..----...-
..--.......__.........-~..
-------------
i5!ScSA3!AS!==
---
- -.
~~~
en ... ...
-
-
:
.
..
. . .
~:-:-
.. -
-_...:!=~==:=::::!
...
~
.
.-
....
-
.
.
.i
-
-
~
-
c c
.. ...
- .
.""
....
- ~
o
:i
Co>
:~
D_
- C
_ 0
:; .;;
I~
.
... .-
...
--
. .
,!:
..
..
..
-....
--
...
co
,
-
en
...
..
.
I
..
.
-
o
-
00
- -
..
~
c
-
Co>
~
~ e
... ...
.!
~
.
.
o
"'" "'"
c .~
- .
- ,.
.---- -- ------ .--- . . ..
~-------.----------._~~~~~~~
~._._._-_._.__.__._.__.__._._._-~--~~-~~
- ...........- .....- ..........- ...- - - - - - .. - -
..."'-- .... .............. "'....
_...._~.-...~.._.~~-~-~.~~-~
~.-....._.-.-_._._--~~--_P.~
0_.-.0__0._._._0___000000000
"'_~_~~~~~~~..J~~~"..J~~....~~~~~~~~
=======:======:::::::::::::=
22-.2--2-:20:2-0000000000000
._:_.==.=._:00 ZggZggggggggg
oooo__I"o~I"oo._ .ooO~_OOOQC~C
~~_.....- ~~ __0.... _oooo~oo~_~~.
--~......- ..... -"--... --~.....- -~.........,.........
- - - -
:-:
...~
~ Co>
..
- ..
_ ..
.::;
. .
- Co>
-..,
....
.!: ~
.. ..
.. ..
~~
..,
.- 0
'":
.~
...
. .."
_ ..... co
.. ...
... ...
0.0 g:; :- 0
0.... _ ....., _ 0
..., . "II:f _..,_
-~- - --.-
-.-. --=-:.~ :':::'::-ti:
~~~~ ~~ e ~~o ~ ~..c-~~
i~i~ i~: i=; g = ~:~E~i~
~~~= ~: ~_ ~i= ~ ~ ~_o_~i
ow ~ .. "CI. "IOU'" c: 0-=_0""0':
~~~~ ~e ~~ _:=E_~__ ~.;~-~~:
...a:..-. oar: "'.....J .... _.~. ....._.....
..... _o~.....o.. ......
~t;~u ~t; ~= ....;~:;- ....;~...;~ ti_::E :~~
'-3-3 ._~ .-- .-DO'- CE~i:O-
=~=~ =: ~~ ~=~~2=~~ ~~-y~~~
_cae .~ _. __c~___.. ~~ .
c:o.o co C COC II: 0 uooo~_
~cucu~cu c... _c __~~~~ _co
y_ _ U_ A__ ~__ u_u~uc. _ _
_.......~-=...-.::t(..).c... &.&c::l -8.-8 a::-o.o.....
.... . u c u c CE u _ ..,. .... u ... _.-., 0 .. u.....
~~:_:~~:~~~ .~~~~.i~~i~'E~~~~~~
.. .......... _w ..... _...._c:_____ .-....o__Q
C) . .- :t .- Ct =- .-.. . _ - .. _ _ ._ .... :8 '" II: Q ... tt:: ::tr 0
=~~~=a;~g~';~'=~:~'=~'='-= =.~=.~;-
c-a- c-~c .ece _c.~ _ .c_
-a .- .-...- _ ~ ... _ "D _ Ot _ "UI _ _
==~=~~=~~=~o~===~:~~:~.~~:~=~
..--m-...__._2_.'-I_u_g.,~~!~~3=
.~~~~;~=~~.~-~~:~~~~:~=.=~~~~=
~-=-=~-=~-;3--'~~--_~~..~_ _e
'-_"__'-__'-.'___._u_.._u._o...~o~__
c.-c.- c:- c_ -sa -c- YC:c~cc_
~c-c_~c:__c__-._~-c--~_=:t~:t.~
.-.- -_ . U__U ___ 00 0_
-.- .. -.. _.-. _ a...... _...... ...__. ......._ ....._
-u.u_-u_-..,.~..._u -_u_-_o~.__~_
- ~ .. ._ __a .._ ___~___.... ..
~!I!!i.!li.!~i~.!ii~.!~ii~iiii!~
-~__~-..JR-~~u_~_-c~c--c==-~..J-
... ..:. ~ ~
... ~ ....; ~ ='l
..... -'
.." .
:::3
C>
:;::
...
oft
-
.."
C>
co
co
~
....--
- ....
- ..
- .. -
- ....
.. - -
.- u c
- '"
- ~ ..
.. ..-
... .
.- ..
,:::a:_
--
~ ~
. ..
... ...
1111111111:111:11::::::
~~~~~~~~-~~~-~~~~-----~
c c . . . . _ _ -.: <<: c -= _ .. c c _ c .. . C Ie C
- ., ., . - - - - .. .. .. - - .. .. .. ., - .. - - - -
~u~~uuu~uuuu....uuuuuuuuuu ~_
.~.....~-~~~.._.~-_..~~-----
.::e::::::~::~:::~==~~:==:~~
.... _ ... ~ ... ~ ~ _ _ .... ~ _ ... _ .... ... ... ... _ .... _ ~ _ . . . Ie C
_.__.~_~..~...___~_...~_~.~~~oc
_..___________________w_____
-----------------------~.*~~
.______.________.______OOO~2
~~~~~-~~~~-~~----------~~~~~
.!!!.!!!.
~2~~=~~~~==~"~~~~=~=~:;~;:~:
.,
...
-
....
~
C>
;=
on
-
'-'
OR
=:
~
~
C>
..
.... :;
,. OR
..
.. '"
:; C>
~
<:>
::; '"
-
~
..
~
'-' 'f
'" ~
- ~
'" C>
- ~
C>
~ :: ~
'-' .,
OR ... :
-
'-' ~
- ....
.... ..
~ e .!!
0
~ ...
.. ~
.. ...
OR - ..
.. .... i
'" ....
C> e
~ .
<:> ~ a:
....
OR C>
:= ~
-
..
'-'
~ ~
:=
'"
..
'"
~
....
~
=:
~
....
CO
~
e
-
....
~
..
..
-
GO
.
::
..
-
.... ...
...
--
... ....
;;; cO
.. -
...
..
-
..
..
i
...
-
-
~
-
.....-................-..... ...
~~~~~~~~~!'-~ -
......................... ...
........-........-... ..
~:=:2::.:.~~:t.:!.~~ ~
..
<>
...
0000000000.
001000'000000
gg:gggggggg
0100100,000000
O";Qo";a.,ft~o"';o
"'"'10..,.,.-.........,,0....._
- - - -........
-
;!!
..
<>
on ""
- ..
. .-
,. .. ...
~ .. ....
- .. a:
. .. .
e .- ""
- -
... ... .. ..
... on ... :!:
CO
<> ... on ....
.. 2 ...
. a:
~ on -
. on '; . '0
... ~
- 2-
:!: ....
~ ~
.... .... - - v -
.... u ., .. . -
a: '" ... .. ...
... ..
'0 .. .... .... <> ..
""' a: .... -
__'Ow
. . c_
~--..
coc...1
..
-
..
-
i
...
i
...
:::__:::::-_-----
..~---------
- -.-.- -.-.- .-.-.-.-.-
-......&...c~...-&.-
..........,............
.....................,....
...............
00.__.......
........--...........",...........................
:
...
...
...
.;
e
::::::::::::
==googgggogg
.......::...""......:......
.";0";00,,"00.0"';0
...,..........f'ItOl""_..........
.................. .................,
~
~
...
on
..
-
=
...
.~
~
<:>
...
on
.
...
.:!-:
~"':
.- ~-
. "" co
_0"'100
IIttClo 'ClI~
o_~__
....-
co
I Go. c>> Q. A.
u-uu-
-:tz___ .
..
<>
...
....
....
...
...
...
a:
. ...
....... .....~.. .
- 0_- ......,U'OiC~
...... . ~ - a:.......
... 0_ C)
.C>OoO.c:_J6:Jll:O
-0-.....0_'""___
00 _ C - ZII ._ ._ _
c"..... 0............
0__0_ _ tEl
- f...)_ ..........."u
--CZ__UC'UUCZ'
"lID 0 0.0...
cG..IID.~_._u__...
_UU__U_D. AD...
__c_a:c.'1D_......
o ~ 0 ~ c . ... _
OIU_"'''' _ _
c - C '" "a 'W-
.-. - _ C ~ C C
_...._'0......._..
... - - ""'...- -
- t.. .- ,- . Q. _ A. Q. ._
=".=-a.=.~:i'.
.. - ...- tD
.... o_u 0__ ..... . u
- IE _ .- CE _ .- . _ _ 0 _
=--. ....,-~pt
o _ _.. ..
._t.,.1-c:U-....OlI..C
: ~ CD: :.= c = ~ .~ .~ .~ ._
-C:-CIIll't-c: ___""
U .. . _ - . .. "" ft ~ ~
-..__.c ..
---"'.-u...........
--~--~-_.._.-
---.....-- -. ...
~~ ..;;~..~ t i:;:;~
::::;::::.1.1=:
--c_cr:c_C&a:_c
'0
""
~
'0
...
..
-
co
CO
-
on
.
.::;
.. -
- '"
.
. ""
.- CO
...
..
..
<>
..
-
.
..
=
-
on
~
~..:e..: -=
= cQ~:=:C = =
:~ .. ===cc ~= = ~
~c C .--- -0 ~o ~ _. ~
~! ! :!~~i~ i= u i~ ~
.. Ut""';u _=z-.. .-;.a: =__...._
:t -~=~ ';.0 ~~::;;...e c eg=~ ~
~ ~~~~ ~;~!=:~~: f_~:~;: ;
.. - - - -.- ____..c _.__ u_wu
~iE:!~i.~~:E:5i!~~~!~a!~~i~
o = =- ~ · .... ~ :; = ~ = .. = _ & = : ..; ~ .. :-:; = .;; ... =
_u_ -2~.3 -0= o":~ . :-C. 0 _1= 0 ....~.:....
_~~~..__~-;-~_::au-:-=-~~~~
.....->>-..--.-.- CC- ..__c-......_ _
- ... .- .- .- ... _ . _ u. .. .... _.... .... ....._
---c~___o_~_____._.__.~__~
~~~_~_O~ ~ ~~__~__..___ M_
c. ~....... __ --__0 ... 0_
'WI ....- .. .". . ...... 0 ... _ 0 "a _ ... .. .... ... _ ... _ o. 0
---~---~-------- - ------
~.!! = = .a :;; :: :! = .. .: Q. .!! = ::.:!! .: .~ 0 =- : .; X. =- ~
SO~g=~=o_=~~oaa~~~wo=a~~~~
-....~...-........-...-
- - - - - - - - - - -
--..--------
.............&IL...........
~ ~ ~ ~ ~:!!:!! ~ ~-.!!! ~
-----------
.........vt"".............""....
------...---..
UU~Co,)UU~UUuC,.l
--.......""--........-..--..............-
~ ~ = = ~ = : 8 I I =
~ ~ M M ..... ~ M "" "" ~ ~
"CI.....,...................."CI
a ~ ~ a ~ . . . . _ .
-.-.-..............-................--
:;=:5t::;::=~::::=:;
-
...
-
....
-::-: =
"5'5=.I~ ..;;
...A...... ..,
----;-.=1.; =
i;~~~;_:;l_-; 0::
--......- ............
UU____-~ ICeD
--........-..u......._.....
I :I ~ - ... ._ .. ~ ~ c..J ~ iii
... ... . - .. .. .....- foot _ .
!!!!!i;!~~~!
=
..
-
...
i
..
..
-=
:=
==;==::::::=-==e
.-"
...
...
...
:
Oft
-
...
~
~
!
I
...
CO
.-
8
~
~
co
-
-
-
-
..
:'
...
....
."
..
..
II
...
..
~
'" ....
.. ...
u ...
...
C>~
:;-
u:::
!~
..
.-
.a
.-
.c
"
III
_ c.:>
- -
V)~
u ..
.. -
c.:>
-
....~
... -
~ ..
""
~:;:
c.:>
.... ...
-
=~
""2
~
.... ."
.. ....
C>
""
C>
....
....
...
~
I
....
-;;;
o
....
..
~
:
.
:
e
..
.!!
":
....
co
i
~
co:
co
2
~
~
c:
...
..
..
..
:'
co
..
~
~
o
.. -
C>
~
:!
-
..
..
2
.. - ..
. '0--
- ..
_ _ co
." .2'
C>
C>
.
-
;
...
..
":
.~
.:~
lS... :;
~
.. -
~.!:
00000.00
0100'0'000
.000000_
000000
00.1000
~o~.,; 0>
~-_C"W ~
...
co
en _
. -....
. .. ."
- ..
"" "'" ... ..
.-..-
.....c:_cn
,. "" - .,
c _._
0.. ..
_... e-
...... ...... .
~........__ 0 .. ___.".
..~. __0_ >u_
co... _ U'IIC _..~
c:-c..-. _ .~. .~.... =~
.._ JK""_ ~ 00__
w........._. ..".. ______.
-_0_ tit' __a ~
.........00-.-""0_0 ..
~ I_~~::;~;;. ~..:; =0 ::0:;
:=~~~ .ii ..a~cn.;o
--- --::. -- .-..
_.. c .."ODe _Q __ _c .
: ~~~=~~~:=~ :I~!
."'''''._0_ '-Wee __.....
~ 0_ .
0.- 'Q- O~..-. _0'-
~~~~~=__~~~_~oa~~
co
o
c
..
..
....
o
-
..
...
..
..
..
....
c:
..
..
..
....
...
:;
~
.
..
~
...
..
..
~
:;
...
...
co
..
.
..
=-
~
-
-
..
...
..
2
~
~
..
....
o
E
..
...
""
..
~
:;;
C>
--
o.
-
....
..
...
:;
-:.
-
...
:;
-
-
~
e
~
... -
.. 0
co .-
.. -
c: _
..
. ....
.. i
co
.. ....
- co
-..
C> ...
....
. co:
....
0_
o 0
... -
_ 0
CltOOO
c: - _....,
...
....
co:
~
o
~
...
c:
..
..
co
:
...
:;
....
~
.. ...
!li1
...
:=:~
. . 2
.. _ 0
~.:-~
. ..
- - 0
- _- u
- c: -
u c: ......,
.. ..
.. -.oK; "CI _
- ... c "'"
.._c.,.. ..
.-c::.. _
cr- -c...-
_c.ca -_c
- - ~ .. --
2 ...
.; _ :;: _ :: c: 11ft
- Gt. e-
.. >>-c__
___o.=-_
_"'_.~u...
o c c ., -- .. c
.-....a:.c.n-
~ 0
0-
o
.,.
.. -
...
....
o co
- ..
-
C>
...
o on
o
~
z
.... ....
co ..
.. -
~
...
.. -
- ...
....
o
-
- --
.~ .. .!!
~.~-
-.......~~-~
c..___
C'cc:cccc
~=-m_....
...., en...., u (",,) c..> c..I
:..
_~o.........c.D~
.
.!!!
-
-
~
-
.
-
-
..
-
c:
==
.-
.. ..
<>
c:
..
.. ..
.!! :
- ..
.. -
-= .~
;;
co
-
-
..
...
.
~
-
..
1-
A _
..
.. .-
- ...
;:
--
... ..
..
-
..
-
...
,;C
ggggggg:=
03oooog20
gco:ggg.45:
=~~==g::tg=
.... _..... .-s
...
<.> ...
co::;-
--0:
~
-;;;
...
....
...
~
..
....
"" -
o ...
~-
.... ..
:; :;:
...
.. ..
_ co:
'"
o
co ...
.. ....
.. co:
~
=
""
~
....
c:
-
-;;;
...
~
:::
-
~
-
..
..:
... <.>
u co:
co:
;;
o
c:
:
...-
o
-0
o
.. .,.
c-c_:;
_......0:;;
co
o
""-
.,-..,0
.- 0
.... ""
::;....
:::...
o ~
..
..0 ...,.
~~:;.
.. 0 0
_coc:
. ....
.. ....
.!! ., u-;:;
:..0:;;=.-....
~~
_"0
- ""
... ... 0
c~=.;
... 'a ... .
_ c _ ...
.. ..
- --
- ~ ::I C
~ ~ --
.. .......
.. _ co
_e...
G-- _
.-
!:Ei
. - ~
-a_ .._
->>--...---
..i""::a.,..,.;;....
~ .. c c .. c . c c
ar:a-:::tar:---_
.... ... ...
':t .... _ __
.;,--.
, 0
:: ~~c
0..2
~~u.......
...
-
.
~-
'" -
Co _ 0_
::: .,. 0
_ 0 0
o.n__
-1_";
-
-
-
cc:cce _
:.~:.:.:.. ~
C'ccc. _
----- ~
uuC,.,tuu _
.c........ ..
: : :t :: It .~
______c:__
_"_"""00
.......,.""....
c ..... ..
______.:t_
u-__..-~_.....o
-_......,J__O&.O
~
co
o
CO
o
=:
..:
-
""
=
i
:
-
<:0
~
C>
~
=
...
:;
~
~
~
o
co:
...
:!
~
...
C>
."
C>
U
~
:!
e
..
...
...
...
III
..
..
..
.-
.a
.-
.c
"
1&1
-
:-
A-
..
on
-
::
=>
...
...
~
o
:::
u
~
;!
...
~
..
....
".
~
~
~
~
o
~
..
.!!!.
i
~
:::
2
...
A-
.
::
o
...
~
A-
...
":'
...
..
A-
U
..
i
...
---
.._~
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
00<>
... ... ...
-
-
-
.
-... ..
- -
.
. ...
00.
- ---
.:!
..
-
.-.- .
~ ~ .2
G.CL.;
-=-=!
~......~
c: II: .~
... ..
- =- ,~
-.-. ..
. . ..
.-
.........;.;.
~~~~~.!:
-
:!-
..
..
~
-
-
-
-
...~....
--.--
... ... ....
--...
.... ..
~~.:~
..
...
<>
-
.!!
-
CI
!
..
c:
........
..
-
~
.
o
_on
.
- ..
i;
.
.
...
~
~ ~
:i ~~~
.; u.;..;
~ .,.,..
....w..__o
UUII.",.......
.au."':';
ua....w...
ti5irifici
..
..
~
-.
..................
~~~~~~~
..........--
.............
0000000
... ... ... -. .... ... .....
--....--
- .. ... .. -.-
000010"
...............~.....
..
..
<>
...
~~ ~
:i:i~:i
==":i
,,; .- .. ,.;
.... ~ .,. ....
....-"':....-
(,D Colt __ CD
DO":.
c..t'->>C8c.1
~~~~
_ CI"" c::t
:::: ::
o~ .0
00 ..
... - -
..:
....;
o
o
:!
A-
...
...
I
=.
'"
..
..
-
co
...
.
-
..
.
<>
.
-
.
o
..
..
.. -
0-
... -
-&
~...
~=
::~~~~
gggg:
00000
00"'0.
ClIo..-s _......,
_ ...ro.....
~ ~ ~~ ~~~ ~
~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~=*~~~=~=~=~=~
~~~~====~~~e===:=~==
o~_____~__a~~_~~~_~_
~~~...-....-w~~_wUli....Wgg....w....
D_Q~~~~QQa_QO~ODa~_~
UUUYYWWUUWUUYWUUUWUW
=gggg======ggggg:===
ogggggggoggggogggggg
80000000:0000 000000
g~~~~~~~=2i~a g~=:g~
--- - -~~ - -~~
- _0
. w co
~.. .
-' .. ..
-
o
--
i:.
.. -
--
...
- 0
.
..
-
..
.
_ c::t u_
~~ ~=o
-- -~-
-"0 _~~
,.... -.. ...
- --
~~__ :u~....;
...--- ._~-
0-.... -...e
--ca..... a::: __
~~w~ :-!;;:
"",..._ca. __0.:
.,.., ~ v 00 0 -._
c:y.,- -0-'"
-cae_ 0..... ..
... C~ __'Va u
--... -- -
eo"" .,."-e ....~o
&.oJ... Oc C___ oa:-
0__ c>>>_ 0
_0 ..I-u......"
_..n....Q"Q..c:.... OQoC'lol
~ ~ ;~~~~~...!~~~~=:
~Q.~ ~.;~~~:~i~::ii=
..:~:; -.. ~..:..:..:g II &OCII .. .._
... - ..c- a. "-"_u 00___
.--- ~--~~~-... -o~_a_
;:.! ~e~ggg::;~==i!i
~g~~~=a~___=.~:~==_~~
---~-..._~~~ ----- ~
- _.... ---'a-a ___ ..
-~...~~__~_w_.. ..~~..._...
~ :'=::e~~ 11I.;-:;" .~-= ....'I..=-
... - - .. _.. ~...!.!.~ e :; .. .. -: -: .. = :
__0__..,......____.. a_____
-- M .-000 _.0 ___
-=... - -.. .. - .... ... ..... .. .- .. .. - . -
.....-O--_.__._Q~...~..._u._u
U occ --___~c _3~
---c--.-.._~~_.uu~_~
........-_ o.
. --..a _____._______
0--........___--____--____
P"Io__ _0.........._ ______
---.... ,------------
....Vlce._ .....""......_....,.............
:~~==8=_~~~~&~~~~~~~
..
..
..
..
..
.. A-
......
- ...
e_
:!!o
..-
. co
"':!
-
c .
'" :;
-;
c
. ..
= :I
- . '-' .
.. - -
CI C -
.. - - ..,
CI ..
a-._
e- ...
~"; ~-;
- - ..
... .. - ""
cecc
=--~-
o
-
..
-:;;
---------- i
.........----------.....0.
-- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.- -- ._-~
... . . .......41:...:.:.-:.... _
.........,.,......".."'401111III ..
...,.................~~'a.,,_
...........--..........
000____...._.0.
.......~......-.I...-...--..............."
w
... cw
0..> .. .
... -
-... -
0'" ...
... ...
...
co
co 0_
..._ 0
co-
woo
. ... 0
.. ... -
..
i
..
~
..
.!!
~
..
c
I
-
...
...;..
- .. .
<> 0
. CI c:
.- - -
- -
...
.. ..
.. ... ...
...
... ..
o .. '"
_ c: _
0_ .. ..
---
. - c C
GD 0 .., .- ._
... -
IlK -.........~
...
::
...
...
...
~~~~
r.*~:i-:i:;i ~
~~:ri==== ~
=i==:!=:!~~~~t;~~:i
o_.":"':"':"':uc.,;uuvu__
.,-....WUtc.Dc.D___&_a;_c.:IF
."':":OGOQ eAQQC'C-C_.U
...u.c.&IUyuu..,...,.."....,..,,"""'C,DIiX
..: QO UU uc.iuu~ U v.v Q a
Uuu................-.........._....._v.-..o
.0'00000__000000
OOCOOCtooooooooc
ggggggggggggggg
oOOOOOOQClCtOoOoo
~ 0"; 00 00.0 0,0000 cia
"'''''''''''0'''''''' c C"t.Io..o..o..o..o
...... -~.........~MQ_"""''IG.........
CI
.~
c
-
..
...
-:
-:
-:
..:
....; ....;
0 ~
co
- -
..
u ...
_0..>
.- ""
...
~o
c-
=-~
...
-----
-----
.----
-----
....-....
~~~~~
co
o
o
...
..
.!!
co
o
..
o
~
--
..
~
...
-
..
..
...
::
..
A-
w...
CI ...
..
.;0
.. -
.. 0
o
- -
-
.
"0:
.
.. ..
- -
.. -
.. .
....-
.
0.....--0.....0
.::...;~w.:::..;=
c: _.c: C
0001'::_0100
'-' 00 "'" 0 ~
"'" ~ C>> _
__ 4'-l__u_
.., "--v~.
.-..-----
....u.. ....CJ_.
..._~_IIII't=.._
......
-... CE.a:_.c-o
o. u.- _'-'__ -.I__
I :II - .. .- :II .- - 0
~:! .; .; ~ .: i = ~ ~ c. ..
-0 :=s-;:=g:CK -~~
'W_ c:uc~c...,c~ _<<'\ole
c: .... . . .._ U _
-=~~-=.=-:~-:~~ -..;.
.:'::__-...... -_:!! =;1
,. ... 0 .. _ - tit _ lilt ... ._ _ _
-.. -._.~.__ _c:-
. . ..- ~ - ::II - . _ _ 4ft ._ _
'-.0____ __._.
- '" .. .- - .- .. .- ... . ..... .. .... ...
-~.. c:~:~ c:~ c...;. -Ot
.......u u.......u O"'"C
- c... Vt ... "" ... Vt ex Co _ _ ._
=-_..-m-a_:t CII :li_
e.. ........o~
co-~_~"''''''~c_uc:_
... - .. 0 _ 0 c: 0 c: 0 -_ _.."
.. .. - .- - .- - - .,.
- c-_-_____u__
.., ow .- ... .. .. WI ., .. .. ._ _ . u ..
c c.- c: .- c: - II: _ - c:
...-........c.__.....
o .........._.. v_ 0
-..-.- .. .- ....--~
- Git_ U . U . "'" .. u "" _ _ _ ..
--- .. . .. ..-.._~
: ! : ! ! .s = .! i .! -: i ~ = i
-::t-..._~_.....___uc_:t
!!
'" w
o c
- ..
... -
c :>
... <>
- :;
-.... ...
.u-
~ at u
..
-
... -
... -
... .
........
.. ..
.- - - II: . .. Go _ .. .
- - -~ -- -- . ~w . .
. .. -- _u ._. ...... = c . . ...
- ;::;:~i = !t~ ~~o =-= ....: ;~~i~. a a i
.0 .. w. c _. __0_ ....;... C _." .. ..
~ ~~i=~~;-a ~i~ ;;::_.,,~~~!~ ~I~~:_ : = ! : ~
o _o_~.. -.~ .-___ _ '-M ~ _. __ _ c _ c
$ ~:i~~:~5: ~==i ~o~:!=;:~~:i:~:~:! a a :~_ 0
= ~~~=_~:~c _~~~_ :~::~=~_~!:;:=!=~~ .. .. ~;: =~
~ .. - . - ." :;; ... .~ ~ -:: =...: . g = -: ~ - 0 ~ :: :; =- ~ .~ .. = ~ ~ c :.. e .: ... u - : ~
.........=:;.1__==:......;;-= =- .":;....;.. .~-:;..~.!!'~o .=~c.: .,._~ .::== _
.. .~ :; ..... ~ ~ : - . . .. = =- - ~ 3 .. & : 1Q... ..:;; & ~ :I 'Wi <C :: .. :; Q ~ .= .. -:::. = ~ :: Ii .= = t: ... ~
.: = :: ~:- -:.! -: ::: : ~ ~ = .! -; 1; .; ~ .= ~ : ;;:... :': ~ '5 .: ~ _:ow ! .. ~ :; .!;-a ~ ~ ~ 8 : : = ..: v:
.... .. ----..........,,-..a . .JI ......_0. -__..0 . lIO=-:l=-""'.
. c..t .. :' ~ ~ - .....=.=.= M . Ct .:: .:: ~ .. ~...; .:- ..: ... '; :;; .:: 0... .. ... = c.D _ Cool - ;.. _ u c:; u _ ~
c ~.;.;: ..__ :-:--- =':~M1"'~...;"'''''; le..::~ en.:..:.c:,..;.; ~ ~.;.; ~~.;~..
.~ ===c~~~.~===.;=...~~~_~:= ~~.=!~~;==&~~==;;==~~~:~
- .-- _C'_,_,__ .. 00-_.0 _ _ _0_ _ cc ~_
~ ~!~~~~~~;!!!3~!iiiiis!i~~S~!ii~!E~~=~~~~!!83~!~
.~
.a
-
...
~
~
..
..
..
-
-
:-
.
':
...
~
-
.
~
-
-
-
-
..
~"E:-:
--- ----
e._._
3~3o~
.. -
..:~O_
..
.~
..
...
-.............
..
~-:~-=~ -=-::~ :
!. =~:.:!= !~~~ !!;;....
5 =====3=== .55. i
~~-~.. -.- - -
:-~~~~~!~~~::=!1 ~ ~
~~=II!I~!;==~~~~==!.
~iiii~i!~jiiii;!ii~i
-u~-~-_~___cn__~~_u__
--o-~....~-___.....___O"~
~-~....~~... ~~.....- -
__uo.... ceu,-c_
--~----~~~~==~==~::~
-
..
I~ =- =
.. ..c
. . .- -
-- - .
...- ...
... ..
..---
AU_tlIII
......... --
.....
_0_A11
...... -
-... - ~
=~J:.I
-_c~
--
...
... _-1'roI
_ ... cow ......
! !.!.!!!!.!!.!.!!
. c:ccccc..cc: c
~ .....---..........
c u~UUUUUUCo.lU u
-;;-;;:-:.:.-:.~-:.-:.-:.:-:.-:. ca
-....----...-....-..
.-~-...-..._---~_..
.................,..............-
-::~. .!!!:=~=.=.=!!!..!!!!1!.!!c~
a.;;~====~=.!!!==:!~=
.-,
-.....-'lIO_............._....._......
. .-..~.,....-..iC'W................~
... C_UCllC_UO....
......~_""...,,'-ft..n_...__.._.,...
""'..........""..........................C'otoI...................
..
:'
...
:!
~
:5
:::0
'"
.....
~
C>
==
....
'"
a:
~
~
>-
'-'
~
~
~
....
""
....
<.:I
...
~
...
a:
""
~
-
a:
""
;,
...
.....
~
~
..
'"
~
-
...
..
...
.
2cc:
... ...
- --
.. CD'"
..
...-
... - -
-.%: -
~....
~ .. ..
-..... .....
::ZZ
g ~ ~
..
::
c
i
.....
-
-:
-
-
~
.. ..
.~ ~
..~..
.. - -
- . .
CO CO
... ...
... ...... -.....
.., c.. ___
- c- _- -
- ..
_0 ~_...
- .. -- .. -
0_0..,00
... .. ... ~ ... ...
...
-
-~
.- 0
-...
..
- -
..
o
...-
..
~
... ...
... ...
..... u...u ........
CoO _Co'. c.!!C.D
u...OUQ UU
_CoD.,.,...", __
t:2U_O,a GO
~-=_tn_ Men
_c:t______
_Inc.D_c.Dc.D...._
_c:aOt-OUt-_
~UUc.oU_UlCD
...
... ..
o
.....-
<>
.=:
<> ...
- ..
00000000
~O~O~~O~
000000'00
OCtQc:::tCtOOCt
OOClOOOOO
o OO.nC....O
.,., ros-.o=2::
...
.....
...
'0
-
- -
. ..
- ...-
"" u...
""
..
_ _ 0
-
-....
.. .. -
.. c ::
... :;:
'" ""
0""'"
~..., -
.. .... ...
- C .....
U .. a:
-
~ -
C
""
C> _
- .
c
..
:
e
~
.!!
-
... C
U ..
a:
...
_u
"" ~...
CO
..: '0
....
0-
;~~
_ 0_
- ..
:t ..
:.:
.... ~-
C _ _
- ...-
CO
~ Z - _:il:...
U=.... .......
. -...
o _c__
1f""t'O=-__ =-2
CO- _00
o._C:C_..c:C
C ...-__....
_M. _.....
40C --
"" .. .... _ .- 'a U U
'" ..
IICC_U___c-o..
..
-- --
.... et-..,-
....... ----
02__ """
....... "".,""."
__CCC_CC
GEUI-....-_--
D..-"O
-u
-... -
- ""
- ""
CO_
-
-~~
... ..
u -
CZ" .._
...-
O=.~
..
CO .-
':
....
;
~
a:
c
2
...
i
- ...
<>
~ ...-
-.... -
c ~
O_UA.
- - co
_ CO _
.... 0-
- --
.. 0 C .-
C _.._
u
CO co
c..o 0 '-_
_.... _ ...." A
""'" "" - ...
0". _..
CC.__~_:.o
_>>1__ _C
0.... C _..
- ...... ..
-.a 0 _ ....
.. ---.. ...
.. ..._ ...a
0"" _ C_
... -...
- .
-1.....==:;;-
C';;. 10.
.a-=~~=;:;:-'"
-
..
~
-
.
...
-
CO _
<> . ~
... .. -
~':c1
-
..
~
~
...
-
...
-
..
-
.~
~
CO
... .. c
2.:-
i ==
!. .=. uu
..... e.__ __
---~--..-
_4 ____
-......,. -.....
C _ _ _
I:w..=~:..
_u. "'. c.>>~__
..
ia
_....c....__...
- ... ...
2
-
...
o-...............,~_
--~.........,.."...,
..
...
-
..
-
A:
..
...
-
-
..
CO
...
CO
-
U
...
Go
~
-
~
.:!
~
""
~
co
""
""
..j
~
CO
~
<>
;;;
~
...
...
...
=
...
-
...
....
..
~
..
~
~
::
...
~
...
...
<.:I
~
...
3
=
~
-
::!
...
-
<.:I
..
;;;
:::!
~
~
~
~
...
C>
...
<.:I
<.:I
-
...
U
..
~
...
-
8
-
..
~
...
~
:!
~
.. ...
.. ~
IUi
CO ...
--
: ~
"" ..
_:i
...
CO ..
i~
':i
CO
Co> ..
....~
.- ..
... .
CO _
&-
- ..
co ..
o
_u
CO
-0 _
... .-
- ..
- -
'::~
.. ..
.... -
Co> ..
.. Co>
Co> _
..
..
.e
-
.
~
.-
.-
..
..
..
i
...
..
c
:;
..
~
...
ii
-
J
-
\
-
,.....--
."
'"
~
=hI
.
"'~bl--
/'"
3
F
/XrP0'l 0 ~,x C-1
bNEETWATER AUTHOR I ~Y
,-
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328
(619) 420-1413
FAX (619) 425-746~. __ _,_
. . ........r_ _____
rEa i c,
r. h,)
~. ---
? .~ 'II:
, ...... .... ~-;
GOVERNING BOARD
BUD POCKLlNGTON, CHAIRMAN
GEORGE H. WATERS. VICE CHAIRMAN
JAMES F. DOUD, SR
SUE JARRETT
MARGARET COOK WELSH
JAMES S. WOLNIEWICZ
CARY F. WRIGHT
WANDA AVERY
TREASURER
DIAN J REEVES
SECRETARY
February 8, 1996
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Subject:
1995 GMOC REPORT - SERVICE AVAilABILITY STATUS
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
This is in response to your request letter dated December 11, 1995 to provide an
evaluation of Sweetwater Authority's ability to accommodate forecasted growth considering
both short and long-term perspectives.
The San Diego County Water Authority and Metropolitan Water District continue their
efforts to improve the reliability of the region's water supply system and its ability to
weather a repeat of the 1991 drought situation. Metropolitan Water District has acquired
a large reservoir site in the Domenigoni Valley in Riverside County for the construction of
Eastside Reservoir to store excess water during periods of plentiful supply to the San
Diego region. This will provide for drought or other emergencies, such as earthquakes.
Construction of the second pipeline by the San Diego County Water Authority to serve the
South Bay should be completed and operational by the end of next year. This will provide
the necessary redundancy to minimize interruptions of water supply as a result of planned
or unplanned shutdowns of a one-supply pipeline.
Partly as a result of the establishment of the Chula Vista Interagency Task Force,
Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District have developed an ad hoc committee to
coordinate each agency's water supply and service activities in Chula Vista.
Sweetwater Authority had approximately 39,000 acre feet of water in storage in Loveland
and Sweetwater Reservoirs as of December 31, 1995. This amount of water is equivalent
to approximately 18 months of imported water supply. Sweetwater Authority does not
intend to purchase imported water for at least the next year. The expected delivery to
consumers for 1996 is 21,600 acre feet for the 12 month period. This repr-asents no
change from the consumption during 1995.
A Public Agency,
Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Re: 1995 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status
February 8, 1996
page two
..-,
In regards to the 1994 GMOC's report pertaining to water, the Authority has the following
updates for the 1995 report:
1. The Authority has continued to provide information to consumers regarding
water conservation programs and is maintaining a voluntary conservation
status. Changes in types of landscaping using xeriscape, as well as other
water use changes, have been recommended to our customers since the
origination of our Water Conservation Program.
2. The Authority continues to work on the brackish groundwater desalination
project. This project will extract groundwater from the Lower Sweetwater
River. Preliminary design and an Environmental Impact Report are in
progress for this project.
3.
The Authority continues to investigate the storage of surplus water in
groundwater aquifers by using injection/extraction wells in the San Diego
Formation.
..-,
4. The Authority is proceeding with design and environmental compliance to
increase the storage capacity of Sweetwater Reservoir by approximately
2,000 acre-feet.
5. The County of San Diego is developing a feasibility report to produce and
distribute reclaimed water. However, Sweetwater Authority does not have
plans to distribute reclaimed water at this time. If reclaimed water becomes
available, we will consider the potential use of injection into the groundwater
aquifer for recharge for our demineralization facility and distribution to
potential reclaimed water customers.
6. The staff of the Authority and the Otay Water District have met frequently on
sharing of services. An agreement between the two districts has been
executed. Discussions have also been held on assisting each agency on
water supply to improve each agency's reliability.
7.
Rezoning of older residential communities in Chula Vista to multi-unit
housing continues to make existing small diameter cast iron pipes unable to
meet the required fire flow demands. Sweetwater Authority requests that
consideration be given to this situation when land use decisions increase
demands on the water supply infrastructure.
.......
(",
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Re: 1995 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status
February 8, 1996
page three
8. Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District are working through the San
Diego County Water Authority to develop a region-wide "Highly Reliable
Water Supply Rate" available for industry. This effort is in response to the
mayor of Chula Vista's request for a firm water supply for new industry.
This proposal has been merged with the City of San Diego's SWAP program
(San Diego Water Availability Plan) which proposes to collect slightly higher
rates to provide funds for water transfers.
9. Through Sweetwater Authority's Master and Metallic main replacement
program we continue to improve the efficiency and reliability of the local
water distribution system.
All the items listed above are directed towards Sweetwater Authority's goal to reduce
dependency on imported water to below fifty percent.
Regarding your request to provide an overview of recent activities of the Interagency
Water Task Force we are providing the following update of local, regional, and State-level
water planning activities:
1 . Further progress/refinements regarding MWD's long-term water supply
policy.
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California has adopted an integrated
resources plan which includes six new implementation policies. The policies are as
follows:
A. Reliability: Through the implementation of the Integrated Resources Plan,
MWD and its member agencies will have full capability to meet full service
demands at the retail levels at all times.
B. Balance: MWD shall demonstrate stewardship by maintaining a resource
mix which balances investments and additional improved imported supply
capability with investments to assure leadership in local resource
development and conservation.
C. Competitiveness: MWD shall provide affordable water service and will
maintain its competitiveness by assuring that the effective rate for MWD will
be less than $500 per acre foot in the year 2005.
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Re: 1995 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status
February 8, 1996
page four
..-..,
D. Eastside Reservoir: MWD affirms its commitment to complete the 800,000
acre feet Eastside Reservoir Project with water deliveries to storage
commencing in 1999.
E. Colorado River Aqueduct: MWD will take all necessary access to assure
that the Colorado River Aqueduct will be operated at capacity for the benefit
of all member agencies.
F. Adaptability: MWD commits to a resource development and financial
strategy that is flexible and will provide acceptable water quality and
financial security for MWD and its member agencies.
These new policies change the MWD previous goal of 100 percent of the demand 90
percent of the time and 80 percent of the demand the remaining 10 percent of the time,
and indicate the MWD's responsiveness to its member agencies' concerns.
2.
Status of discussion with CWA regarding the wheeling of water to
increase long-term supply reliability and progress on the related highly
reliable water supply rate.
--.
The San Diego County Water Authority has prepared a Draft Wheeling Policy and has
discussed the policy with the general managers of member agencies. There were many
concerns about the policy because it did not encourage member agencies to utilize local
resources at an affordable wheeling price. The policy is currently being looked at again
by the SDCWA staff.
The highly reliable water supply concept was never approved by the SDCWA Board.
Instead, the San Diego Water Assurance Plan suggested by the City of San Diego has
been adopted by the CWA Board. The initial concept of this program was to develop plans
to purchase water during water-short years and to pay all costs necessary to deliver the
water to San Diego. Currently, the feeling about this concept is being reevaluated and the
concept of the San Diego Water Assurance Program is melded into the current
negotiations between SDCWA and MWD regarding the Colorado River reliability and the
use of the State Water Project.
3. Progress update on Domenigoni Reservoir construction.
Metropolitan has committed to proceeding with the Eastside Reservoir (formerly
Domenigoni Reservoir) and has committed to being ready to begin delivering water to
storage in this reservoir commencing in 1999. Currently work is proceeding on
construction of the dams and relocation and construction of conveyances which feed the
project.
-
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Re: 1995 GMOC Report - Service Availability Status
February 8, 1996
page five
;~~
4. Review recent regional discussions regarding reclaimed water planning
in conjunctions with implementation of Clean Water Program Sewage
Treatment Facilities.
The Sweetwater Authority is not involved in projects in the Otay River at this time. The
Authority is talking to the County of San Diego about its construction of an 8 to 10 MGD
reclaimed water treatment plant on the Spring Valley trunk sewer. Sweetwater Authority's
concept is to use reclaimed water in the seawater barrier along Interstate 5 which would
protect its future Phase II of the Lower Sweetwater River Demineralization Facility from
seawater intrusion.
We hope the information provided in this letter helps to better communicate the steps
currently being taken to continuously improve the reliability of Sweetwater Authority,
locally, regionally and state-wide. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Hector
Martinez at 422-8395, ext. 613.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER UT RITY
/;(? )-u40 ~ ·
-
~
RAR: HM: In
pc: Mr. James L. Smyth, Chief Engineer, Sweetwater Authority
k:\Iorelei\wp51 ~moc96.ltr
{ J l"i
. (C.;; V
...:[)rdi('(It('({ to COI\1I\Hlllit~ gOt iN
2554 SWEETWATER SPRINGS BOULEVARD. SPRING VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 91977-7299
TELEPHONE 670-2222. AREA CODE 619
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
/~ .
ill
W.O. 2980
Subject:
City of Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission
(GMOC) 1995 Water Threshold Standards Review
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
The following is a brief report on the status of the 1995 Water Thresholds for Otay Water District
(OWD). The OWD continues to assure a high quality, reliable water supply through the
planning, design and construction of water facilities, as well as close coordination with the City of
r Chula Vista, the Sweetwater Authority and other agencies.
The overall outlook for water supply in the State, County and City ofChula Vista for the next 12-
18 months is excellent. The long term picture is also very positive and capable of supporting
Chula Vista's long term growth. This outlook has been achieved through the cooperative efforts
of all agencies involved in providing water to Chula Vista and the coordination efforts by Chula
Vista, Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority.
The OWD is actively developing local water supplies such as wells, recharge, desalination, and
the sharing of treatment plant and storage capacity with other agencies such as Sweetwater
Authority, Helix Water District and the City of San Diego. The need for a ten day water supply
without San Diego County Water Authority (CW A) has been fully addressed in OWD's Water
Resources Master Plan. The OWD is currently able to meet this requirement through its own
storage and existing interconnections with other agencies. The OWD's Water Master Plan
presents a program to continue to meet or exceed the 10 day criteria into the foreseeable future.
The OWD, in concert with the City ofChula Vista, continues to expand the use of recycled water.
Chula Vista and OWD are both evaluating opportunities to create more recycled water, and the
City of San Diego is building its South Bay Treatment Plant. Water from these facilities may be
distributed by OWD.
The projected water demand in Chula Vista is expected to continue at a moderate rate with new
meter sets running at 1500 per year for the next five years. The meter sales between June 1994
and June 1995 were 997, versus the prior 12 months sales of 814.
/101
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 2
The following paragraphs provide more detail about each of the threshold areas summarized
above.
WATER SUPPLY
The short term and long term water supply is expected to meet the projected demand without any
restrictions for the following reasons.
The significant rain and snow California received last year in conjunction with the most recent
precipitation events in the State, have resulted in many reservoirs, both State-wide and local
reservoirs, to be at higher than normal levels. Therefore, the water outlook for the next 12-18
months is that there will be no restriction on the water supply as reported by CW A and
Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
The long-range prognosis is also very favorable in that MWD has implemented a water policy that
assures a long term water supply. It is MWD's goal to meet 100% of the water demand 90% of
the time and the remaining 10% of the time meet a minimum of80% of the demand. To achieve
this goal, MWD is investing in recharge projects, desalination, funding of recycled water and
other new water sources.
On the regional front, the CW A and individual agencies are discussing the potential exchange of
water between agencies and "wheeling" of water by CW A. This will further increase the
reliability of the long ternl water supply as this allows for the more effective use of regionally
available water. CW A is also studying the feasibility of bringing Imperial Irrigation District water
to San Diego. This would further improve the long term reliability of water supply.
The CW A construction of Pipeline NO.4 is expected to be in operation in February 1997. This
pipeline will substantially increase the capacity of the treated water delivery system to own.
Additional reliability will be achieved by having both a treated water and raw water pipeline
coming to the South County. The new pipeline will also provide a significant improvement to
reliability due to major design enhancements; such as corrosion control and flow capacity
capabilities.
The OWD has adopted revisions to our Code of Ordinances which allow for customers to utilize
and be assured a highly reliable water supply. MWD will provide a water supply from alternative
available sources such as farmers to CW A and its member agencies. The OWD's rate structure
has been revised to allow for this availability of water on demand.
..-.,
-
..-.
r f~
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 2
-
The following paragraphs provide more detail about each of the threshold areas summarized
above.
\VATER SUPPLY
The short term and long term water supply is expected to meet the projected demand without any
restrictions for the following reasons.
The significant rain and snow California received last year in conjunction with the most recent
precipitation events in the State, have resulted in many reservoirs, both State-wide and local
reservoirs, to be at higher than normal levels. Therefore, the water outlook for the next 12-18
months is that there will be no restriction on the water supply as reported by CW A and
Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
The long-range prognosis is also very favorable in that MWD has implemented a water policy that
assures a long term water supply. It is MWD's goal to meet 100% of the water demand 90% of
the time and the remaining 10% of the time meet a minimum of80% of the demand. To achieve
this goal, MWD is investing in recharge projects, desalination, funding of recycled water and
other new water sources.
_.
On the regional front, the CW A and individual agencies are discussing the potential exchange of
water between agencies and "wheeling" of water by CWA. This will further increase the
reliability of the long ternl water supply as this allows for the more effective use of regionally
available water. CW A is also studying the feasibility of bringing Imperial Irrigation District water
to San Diego. This would further improve the long term reliability of water supply.
The CWA construction of Pipeline NO.4 is expected to be in operation in February 1997. This
pipeline will substantially increase the capacity of the treated water delivery system to OWD.
Additional reliability will be achieved by having both a treated water and raw water pipeline
coming to the South County. The new pipeline will also provide a significant improvement to
reliability due to major design enhancements; such as corrosion control and flow capacity
capabilities.
The OWD has adopted revisions to our Code of Ordinances which allow for customers to utilize
and be assured a highly reliable water supply. MWD will provide a water supply from alternative
available sources such as farmers to CW A and its member agencies. The OWD's rate structure
has been revised to allow for this availability of water on demand.
-
1'-
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 3
On the local level, the OWD is developing local water supplies and recycled water, as discussed in
the following paragraphs, the OWD has participated in drilling two wells and is evaluating others.
The two wells were determined to be too costly to develop at this time due to the high TDS.
OWD and Chula Vista have agreed to develop additional recycled water opportunities.
INDEPENDENCE FROM IMPORTED WATER SUPPLY
As part ofOWD's long term plans to assure the reliability of water supply, we are developing an
Integrated Resource Planning (IRP). The OWD's IRP has established a goal of obtaining 40% of
its water supply locally when CW A aqueducts are out of service, and 70% from local reservoir
storage when CW A aqueducts are available to replenish the local reservoirs.
The IRP considers development of wells, recharge, desalination, local treatment plants, local
storage, recycled water and conservation. To date the OWD has completed studies on two wells
and the feasibility of a recharge project. As stated above, the wells were determined to be too
costly to develop at this time. The OWD is currently investigating two additional wells. The
OWD has been negotiating with the City of San Diego, Sweetwater Authority and Helix Water
District for treatment plant capacity and lake storage. All have indicated they are willing to enter
into agreements pending Board and Council approvals.
OWD is currently designing several projects that will increase the use of recycled water. One
consists of lining and covering a recycled water pond that will improve the recycled water quality
and quantity. The second project is the extension of several pipelines to open up new areas for
use of recycled water.
EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY
The need for an emergency water supply is based on providing for events that may interrupt the
water supply for six months (MWD), three months (CW A) and 10 days (OWD). The MWD is
constructing the Domenigoni Reservoir to provide six months of storage in case of an interruption
of their raw water supply. The MWD reports that the Domenigoni Reservoir construction
progress is on schedule. Significant construction contracts have been let for the construction.
The planned schedule to begin placing water into storage is in the year 2000 with an estimate of
four years to complete the filling operation.
CW A continues with their efforts to provide for emergency storage needs for delivery to their
member agencies in the event of supply outages from MWD deliveries. CW A has circulated the
Draft EIR for their Emergency Water Storage Project (EWSP). CW A now has four project
alternatives. All the alternatives provide for the emergency storage needs of the member
agencies. The South County water agencies consider the Beeler Canyon pipeline element of the
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 4
.-.
three San Vicente options as an important element, as it offers a number of benefits to the South
County. OWD has encouraged CW A to construct this pipeline as soon as possible. CW A is also
working with the City of San Diego to develop an agreement to provide CW A storage in City
lakes.
OWD has a policy to have a maximum of five average days demand in storage and a minimum of
five average days demand from other sources.
The OWD has effectively managed ten days of CW A planned and emergency shutdowns, and
through its Water Master Plan, has established a program to address future shutdowns of the
CW A aqueduct. The OWD has a number of interconnections with other agencies to assist during
aqueduct shutdowns. OWD negotiations with the City of San Diego for Lower Otay
ReservoirlTreatment capacity for the central and southern portions of the OWD, and an
agreement with Helix for Levy Treatment Facility capacity for the northern portion of the OWD,
are in progress. The negotiations have indicated each agency is willing to establish an agreement
to assist OWD in an emergency.
The County Water Authority has been working with the Helix Water District, Padre Dam, and
OWD to increase the Levy Treatment Plant capacity for increased delivery abilities to OWD and
Padre Dam. This effort includes a pipeline element to provide additional raw water from the
CW A system to the Levy Treatment Plant. This development will provide OWD with a water
supply independent of the number 3 and 4 pipelines, thus improving reliability.
.-.
The maximum of five average days in storage continues to be developed with significant progress
toward completion of a major 30 MG terminal reservoir adjacent to EastLake Parkway, known as
the EastLake Green Reservoir. This reservoir has two independent 15 MG cells. The north cell is
currently in operation. The retrofit to the south cell is progressing well and should be in operation
by June 1996.
The OWD has under design a project to link storage from Roll Reservoir in the south to the 30
MG EastLake Greens Reservoir in the Central Area. This project will deliver 20 MGD to the
Central Area in an emergency. Combined with the 30 MG reservoir, the Central Area will have
more than a 10 day supply of water for an emergency beyond the year 2001.
PLANNING THE WATER SYSTEM
The OWD has completed a Draft Water Resources Master Plan prepared by Montgomery
Watson. The basis of the new Master Plan is the population growth projections from SANDAG's
most recent forecast, designated as the Interim Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast, Water and
Sewer Agencies and input from the City of Chula Vista, and developers. It has incorporated the
.-.
fir!
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 5
concepts of water storage and supply from neighboring water agencies to meet operational and
emergency water supply. own has been working closely with City of Chula Vista staff in
finalizing the Water Resources Master Plan and coordinating the Otay Ranch SPA One
development activities.
The process of planning followed by the own is to use the Master Plan as a guide and to revisit
each year the best alternatives for providing a reliable water supply. The Master Plan is also
revised every five year through an in-depth review.
Representatives from Sweetwater Authority, Chula Vista City Council and own have continued
to meet during the past year to address issues of joint concern as well as keep the City informed
regarding state-wide water issues which may impact development within Chula Vista.
The own continues to have a Water Conservation Program ordinance to reduce the quantity of
water used by customers for the purpose of conserving water supplies.
RECYCLED WATER
On the reclaimed water front, own continues to actively pursue the development of reclaimed
water facilities within new development projects. The OWD is fully supportive of the
construction of an advanced wastewater treatment plant in the Otay River Valley which would
provide reclaimed water for their newly built distribution facilities. The City of San Diego is
progressing toward construction of the South Bay Water Reclamation Plant. The current planned
date of implementation is in the year 2000. The City of San Diego has identified the Otay Water
District as a potential market for reclaimed water from the South Bay Plant. own has expressed
our interest in receiving reclaimed water from this plant and related joint use of storage and
pipeline facilities that benefit t~e City and own.
The own completed a study of the wastewater and the water reclamation program which
evaluated future expansion of the Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility (RWCWRF).
Future expansion of this facility will be driven by the market for reclaimed water.
As additional reclaimed water demand is needed beyond current treatment capacity, the plant may
be expanded. The future reclaimed water supply for new markets is well positioned to meet the
increasing demands. These efforts have been closely coordinated with the City of Chula Vista,
Sweetwater Authority and the City of San Diego recycling plans for the Otay River Valley Plant
and the South Bay Plant.
'/""
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 6
~
COORDINA TION BETWEEN CHULA VISTA. OT A Y. SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
AND CITY OF SAN DIEGO
There has been significant accomplishments in the coordination efforts of the four agencies in the
last year. Some examples are:
1. The own and the City of Chula Vista entered into an agreement designating Otay Water
District as the water purveyor within the City of Chula Vista.
2. The shared resources agreement executed last year between Sweetwater Authority and OWD
has been implemented such as sharing of heavy equipment. Helix Water District and Padre
Dam have been participating in revising the agreement to include them. The City of Chula
Vista has also expressed interest in developing a shared resources agreement.
3. Coordination with Chula Vista on its Sphere of Influence Study and related EIR as well as
close coordination and joint planning of water facilities to serve the planned Otay Ranch SPA
One development.
-
4. Sweetwater Authority and own are jointly investigating opportunities to develop local water
supplies and share water resources. These include such projects as: The San Diego
Formation Investigation, the Middle Sweetwater River Study, and evaluation of multiple
interconnections. own and Sweetwater have agreed to share costs for drilling a well within
Chula Vista near Main Street and I-80S.
5. Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, and OWD are sharing information and data needed to
develop Geographical Information Systems that will enhance all the agencies operations.
6. Continued meeting and issue resolutions by the Interagency Water Task Force.
7. own continues to assist Chula Vista with its sewer billings.
HIGHLIGHTS OF OT A Y WATER DISTRICT'S OPERATION
The following are a few highlights of the 1994-1995 accomplishments by own.
1. No water rate increase associated with OWD operations.
2. Reduced capacity fees.
~
3. $26.5 million in capital improvements designed and/or constructed.
,-..~
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
February 5, 1996
Page 7
4. Installed and inspected approximately 89,847 feet of pipelines.
5. Developers installed approximately $7 million in pipelines.
6. Delivered approximately 21,387 acre feet of water.
7. Delivered approximately 775 acre feet of recycled water.
8. During the period July 1994 to June 1995 Otay sold 997 meters, up from last years' meter
sales of814.
Ed, in summary, the water supply outlook is excellent and the City of Chula Vista's long term
growth will be assured ofa reliable water supply. The OWD's Master Plan presents the program
to achieve the ten day emergency supply criteria into the foreseeable future. CW A and MWD
have addressed long term emergency water supply needs with development of the CW A
Emergency Storage Project (90 days) and the MWD Domengoni Reservoir (six months). The
continued close coordination efforts with Chula Vista and the other agencies will bring forth
significant enhancements for the effective utilization of the regions water supply to the benefit of
all citizens.
The OWD will attend the February 15,1996 meeting and make a brief presentation as requested.
We will need an overhead projector for our presentation.
Very truly yours,
/ at/[
/. -
Timo;py . Stanton
Deyartment Head
Engineering and Planning
"-
"-
~
TNS/JFP:cp
cc: Keith Lewinger
Jim Peasley
CVBATCHR.DOC
'j
'r ,,~",,)
~PGN \) l X.
y\
M:~MORANDUM
January 10, 1996
TO:
The Growth Management Oversight Commission
SUBJECT:
John D. Goss, City Manager ff'
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation "'lI1ro/
Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard - July 1, 1994 to June 30,
1995
VIA:
FROM:
The Department is pleased to present a report on Parks and Recreation activities relating to the Parks and
Reqreation Threshold Standard in the Growth Management Ordinance. A report was previously given
to the GMOC in March of 1995. This report is structured to provide the following information:
. Threshold Compliance Findings
. Identification/Discussion of Current, Relevant Issues, and Proposed Remedial Actions for Non-
Compliance Conditions
. Response to Issues/Recommendations from FY 1994/95
. Proposed Actions/Suggested Recommendations for Current Year
Thteshold Comnliance Findines
Attached (Attachment "A") is a revised park deficiency statistics report. The numbers are slightly revised
from past years, based on population information provided by the City's Planning Department and the
State of California Department of Finance. As noted, the City continues to show a shortfall in park
acreage; however, from 2.22 acres per thousand to 2.17 acres per thousand (June 30, 1994 to July 1,
1995). The main factor contributing to the non-compliance is new park acreage is not added to the
system at the same rate as the city's population increases. This disparity of new park acreage as
population increases continues to be most evident in western Chula Vista.
Also for the Commission's information, attached ("B") is an East/West Inventory as of June 30, 1995.
Id~tification/Discussion of Current. Relevant Issues. and Proposed Remedial Actions for Non-
Cotnnliance Conditions
Although new park acreage has not been accepted for maintenance since the inclusion of Chula Vista
Community Park in 1994, the Department completed or commenced the following projects during the
review period:
1. Lorna Verde Pool Recirculation (PR-134): Project Status: Work commenced work on January
16, 1995, and has been completed.
2. Rohr Park - Phase III (PR-180): Project Status: Completed installation of new playground area
[groat - gmoc4.rpl)
1
i-f
Growth Management Oversight Commission
January 10, 1996
-
3. Play Equipment - Phase II (PR-183): Project Status: Installation has been completed at
Lauderbach Park, Paseo del Rey Park, and Rohr Park.
4. Memorial Park II (PR-168): Project Status: The construction plans for a new restroom per the
Master Plan are completed. The old restroom was demolished.
5. ParkWay Center - Phase I (PR-162): Project Status: Construction was bid during the summer;
and commenced October 1995.
6. Otay Gymnasium (PR-133): Architect/Project Manager was hired in March 1995. Meetings
were held with the community on the design of the facility.
7. McCandliss - Phase II (PR-I77): Master Plan approved by City Council. Construction
documents prepared; civil engineering plan completed. Funding for Phase I will be requested
from Park Acquisition and Development funds.
8. McCandliss - Phase III (PR-178): Project Status: Master Plan prepared and approved.
Construction documents and civil engineering plan completed. Phasing for project will be
determined based on available funds and scope of each phase.
8.
Norman Park Game Room (PR-194): Project Status: Preliminary drawings and cost estimates
are completed; architect is now involved in researching materials, etc., to reduce cost.
-
9. Memorial Bowl Stage Improvements (PR-168): Project Status: An initial concept plan was
prepared for grant submittal and approval. Staff to prepare construction documents.
10. Park Acquisition Fund (PR-185): Council approved the addition of $250,000 in PAD funds to
this project, bringing the total to $1,065,000 (as of June 30, 1995).
There are two main issues which affect the City's ability to meet the park acreage standards; funding and
acreage availability (western Chula Vista). These two issues are being addressed in the Parks
Implementation Plan, discussed in more detail below.
Resoonse to Issues/Recommendations from 1994 GMOC Final Reoort
Recommendation 1.
That the City Council amend the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard
to apply City-wide, both east and west of I-80S.
A report on matters related to the threshold standard was considered by the Parks and Recreation
Commission. The report is being reviewed and will either be folded into the PIP, or presented to the
City Council in the near future. In their 1994 Annual Report, the GMOC conceptually endorsed the
draft .
In addition to the threshold standard, the Parks Implementation Plan (PIP) Work Task Force completed
a report on a proposed Park Equivalency Factor policy. The report encompasses an analysis which
.-,
(gmoc - gmoc4.rpI]
2
includes a school park policy whereby school land would be utilized in a joint use with the City and
counted as park credit. The study includes an evaluation of usable school acreage, and a phasing plan
of school park development. This report will be part of the PIP.
Recommendation 2. That the City Council direct staff to expedite completion of the Parks
Implementation Plan (PIP), and ensure that the PIP is a priority in the work
programs of the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments for the
next year;
Since the Council approved the PIP's preparation as a priority project in the work programs of the
Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments, staff has been meeting weekly to research, plan and
develop the PIP. Due to conflicting workload priorities, the Department has been unable to keep a firm
schedule for completion of the PIP; however, staff anticipates completion of the draft PIP by Spring,
1996.
Recommendation 3. That those sub-components of the PIP which will form a basis for a revised
standard be directed for placement u~front in the aforementioned work
program to avoid continued delay in the adoption of a revised standard.
,-
As noted under Recommendation 1., the PIP Work Task Force has completed reports regarding the
equivalency factors for recreation facilities, and a revised threshold standard. The equivalency factor
report will be part of the final PIP document. Due to conflicting workload priorities, the Department has
been unable to keep a firm schedule for completion of the PIP; however, staff anticipates completion of
the draft PIP by Spring, 1996.
Recommendation 4. The City should create an impact fee program which will require new
apartment construction in Western Chula Vista to pay park fees. Park
Acquisition & Development (PAD) fees are currently collected only for
subdivisions, including condominium projects. It should be noted that
completion of the PIP is also necessary in order to establish specific proposed
improvements and areas of benefit, upon which equitable impact fees can be
collected.
Development of an impact fee program for apartments is part of the PIP work program previously
authorized by Council.
Recommendation 5. New multi-family projects in western Chula Vista should be required to
provide a set amount of private recreation facilities within the development.
General provisions regarding such facilities are included in the proposed City
Design Review Manual being drafted by the Planning Department.
However, these provisions amount to only broad guidelines, and more in-
depth study is necessary to develop a workable program. Preparation of the
PIP should determine a minimum reasonable project size to which such a
requirement should apply.
Provision of private recreation facilities by new multi-family projects in western Chula Vista is a work
component of the PIP. Recommendations will be made based on the outcome of the PIP's analyses.
(gmoc - gmoc4.rpt]
3
Recommendation 6.
The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to assess the
appropriateness. of "mini-parks" in western Chula Vista. While such parks
are more expensive in per-acre costs to develop and maintain, they provide
a more intimate scale for local neighborhoods, and may be the only method
by which local park deficiencies in western Chula Vista can be remedied
without significant condemnation of existing development. Again, this re-
assessment is part of the PIP's work program.
--.,
An assessment of the appropriateness of "mini-parks" in western Chula Vista is a component of the PIP
as previously authorized by Council.
Proposed Actions/Sueeested Recommendations for the Current Year
Any proposed action that may be recommended to the Commission regarding any follow-up actions would
be based on the completion of the Parks Implementation Plan. As this report is in the preparation stage,
it would be premature for staff to offer any recommendations of substance; other than it is staff's full
intent to commence with any actions that the City Council may approve following the Council's
consideration of the Parks Implementation Plan.
JV:NEW:new
Attachments
" A" - Park Deficiency Statistics Report
"B" - EastlWest Inventory
"e" - Park Locator Map
-
-
[gmoc - gmoc4.rptj
4
r',/ (m
~
I-
Z
UJ
::E
I
U
<(
~
<(
(/)
u
t=
(/)
1=
<(
l-
(/)
>-
U
Z
UJ
U
u:
UJ
Cl
Cl
Z
:)
:.::
a::
<(
a..
<l:
I-
(/l
:;
:)
:J
:I:
U
L1.
o
~
U
1O
01
01
~
as
;,
c:
as
...,
It')
01
01
~
ci
M
tIl
c:
;,
-,
It')
01
01
~
r~
Ie:
as
-,
.
01
01
ci
M
Ql
c:
;,
...,
.
01
01
~
as
;,
c:
as
-,
M
Ol
Ol
~
ci
M
Ql
c:
;,
-,
M
Ol
01
~
as
;,
c:
as
...,
C\l
Ol
Ol
ci
M
Ql
c:
;,
...,
C\l
01
C>
~
as
;,
c:
as
...,
o
o
M
.0
.
u;
.
.
I'-
1O
M
.
C>
~
M.
-
.
r:::
o.
;
co
o
It')
ci
.
.
C>
C>
ci
.
co
1O
CO
a;-
M
co
III
a;-
M
It')
o
~
'0
-
..
as
UJ
c:
o
:;
:;
c.
o
a..
'II:
M
o
C\l
.
M
o
C\l
'II:
M
o
C\l
'II:
M
o
C\l
.
..;
o
C\l
It')
c:i
01
It')
c:i
01
It')
c:i
01
It')
c:i
01
-
It')
o
~
'0
-
..
as
W
..
...
lii
a..
'0
..
Ql
o
<(
01
.
-i
u;
-i
r:::
-i
C\l
~
.
It')
~
.
o
I'-
-i
It')
1O
-i
CO
I'-
-i
o
CO
-i
It')
o
~
'0
-
..
as
w
o
o
o.
-
i
o
<(
o
It')
r-:
1O
C\l
C>
c:i
I'-
o
01
..;
I'-
.
.
ai
I'-
01
c:i
CO
co
01
cO
1O
C\l
It')
r-:
1O
o
01
c:i
I'-
;:
;::
It')
o
~
'0
i
w
..
..
tIl
C)
)(
~
'ii
l:
,g
(/)
f
C)
<(
o
It')
C\l
o.
~
-
CO
C\l
C\l
ci
-
-
.
M
C\l
ci
-
-
M
M
01
CO.
o
1O
I'-
N
ui
o
C\l
01
I'-
1O.
o
M
~
.
.0
o
-
CO
-
It')
N
o
o
CO
o
N
o
It')
o
~
'0
i
~
c:
o
li
:;
c.
o
a..
It')
.
gj
It')
.
ai
C\l
It')
'II:
01
C\l
It')
.
ai
C\l
-
It')
.
ai
C\l
It')
.
01
C\l
-
It')
.
ai
N
It')
.
ai
C\l
It')
.
ai
N
It')
o
~
'0
ii
~
..
...
lii
a..
'0
~
u
<(
I'-
"":
I'-
I'-
"":
01
"":
o
C'!
-
C\l
M
C'!
1O
C'!
I'-
C'!
:g
~
'0
i
~
o
o
o.
i
o
<(
o
~
5
C)l
M
C'!
5
C)l
It')
C'!
5
C)l
It')
M
r-:
01
-
CO
M
.0
01
-
M
01
c:i
01
~
01
I'-
<0
CO
-
,
o
cO
I'-
";"
01
I'-
<0
I'-
";"
It')
o
~
'0
i
~
..
II
u
)(
~
~
o
.c:
C/l
f
u
<(
o
It')
It')
.0
It')
-
m
M
.;
It')
-
5
.
..;
on
-
C\l
It')
N
ci
It')
I'-
.
M
a;-
.
~
o
o
M
,-:-
.
I'-
o
.
<ti
.
1O
co
M
N
.
-
CO
I'-
1'-.
-
.
-
G
:2
~
~
u
c:
o
""
as
:;
c.
o
a..
It')
CO
N
M
M
In
CO
N
M
M
It')
CO
N
M
M
In
co
N
M
M
~
N
M
M
It')
~
01
M
It')
01
ai
-
M
It')
01
ai
M
on
01
ai
-
M
G
:2
~
~
u
..
...
i
a..
'0
!
u
<(
.
-
N
1O
-
N
I'-
-
N
C\l
C\l
N
M
N
N
I'-
N
01
-
N
It')
C\l
N
CO
C\l
N
III
~
~
u
8.
-
!
u
<(
o
CO
..;
M
-
N
M
c:i
M
-
,
In
M
r-:
N
-
,
Oi
r-:
-
-
01
-
.0
-
-
,
It')
~
N
";"
;::
N
ai
-
-
,
CO
o
C\l
r-:
o
";"
~
M
.0
o
";"
G
:2
~
~
u
..
II
C)
~
'ii
l:
,g
C/l
f
u
<(
In
II)
cO
II)
.
G ,~
uii,!!fD
as c. c: Ii
""'-g~.;
~ as ,-
~ ~ ~ i
Gaso~
~ c. 0
&00:6;
I'-
-
l2
.
! CD ';
~Q.c;
__"CtlJ:
C:'tJ-
~ .!! '8 --
>-f~1l
Gaso~
oo.g_!
u.'O =as
o
N
c:i
II)
.
! .5
u C (II ..
cs 0.1: Qi
-g~=
~ ~'~ =
G iii 0 ~
o2"81!
L1. 0 ... as
f ~ ,~
ul>>.f!GJ
asQ.cQi
-g~:5
~ .!! 'i --
~-f~Xl
III as 0 ~
o~8~ii
LLO.....=Ca
II)
I'-
c:i
In
.
~
cO
.
.
! .5
~ 8. J!l ~
.,... "0 i ;;
~ij~
!!~!~
G III 0 ~
o~gfZ)Qj
u..o :sea
~
G ,~
otiS&)
as c. c: Ii
~ ~ ~ =.
tIl ::;< ~ i
~ iii 0 ~
o~8~ii
LLO.,...:::ia
~
.
.
-
N
N
ai
M
.
II .~
U Ci en C1
csQ.'EG;
-g~:5
f ~! I
o~8l1lii
LLO :5ia
CO
It')
-
r-:
C\l
.
G ~ ,~
o Q) eft fI)
as Q. 'E 4i
"0 CD :5
~ij:2
~~~l
o~8GG)
u.o :5ii
.
M
M
.0
N
.
G ~ ,~
~8.~~
.,...-g-8:5
~.!! '8 --
>-f~1l
Gas!2~
oC.C;GG)
u.o :5 a;
G
~
~
u
'E
III
'tJ
c:
.s
(/)
'tJ
c:
as
::;<
iii
a..
'0
~
u
<(
N
CO
..; 8
o
N
~ 8
o
- 0;
Ii as
c. III
! ~
~ ,~
5
-i 8
o
.
-
. 8
o
- -
Q) ~
C. tIl
tIl III
t :5
as ,~
.
-
-i 8
o
- ...
ii :J
c. III
Il ~
~ .5
CO
~ 8
o
-
e 11
c. Ql
tIl GI
t ~
III ,~
CO
~ 8
o
- ...
tu :a
Q. II
.. II
~ :;
as ,~
CO
~ 8
o
-
8.i
Xl ~
o
III ,~
CO
~ 8
o
-
G i
Q. II
~ ~
~ ,~
8.i
II ~
~ ...
~ ,~
-
Ii =
Q. G
.. OIl
~ :5
as ,~
~
U
G
=
,~
G
Cl
III
f
u
III
..><
iii
Q.
OIl
=
,~
G
:0
.!!
'ij
~
~
GI
1ij
tIl
.c:
:t::
.c:
Q.
E
III
vi
E
;,
'jjj
c:
E
>-
Cl
vi
'0
o
.S:
..
tIl
~
'0
.!
-
c:
;,
o
u
u
as
o
:s
G
..><
III
-
-
.c:
Xl
o
Cl
(j)
ll'
c:
III
7
.
C\l
t:r
~
Iii
b
~
o
u.
-
Gi
'tJ
U
o
E
Cl
u
o
::E
5:2.
EAST/WEST PARK INVENTORY
AITACMENT "B"
as of June 30, 1995
City of Chula Vista
II
EAST OF I-80S
WEST OF 1-805
Park Acreage 11 Park I Acreage I
Discovery Park 14.5 Eucalyptus Park 19.8
Greg Rogers Park 52.1 "]" Street Marina 21.4
Rohr Park 62.2 Bay Blvd. Park 1.5
Bonita Long Canyon 12.5 Friendship Park 8.4
Halecrest Park 2.0 Hilltop Park 10.9
Independence Park 4.1 Lauderbach Park 4.0
Paseo del Rey Park 3.0 Lorna Verde Park 6.2
Rancho del Rey Park 10.2 Los Ninos Park 5.2
Sunbow Park 4.0 Marina View Park 4.5
Sunridge Park 6.0 Memorial Park 8.0
Terra Nova Park 8.5 Norman Park 1.7
Tiffany Park 7.2 Orange A venue Fields 4.0
VaIle Lindo Park 4.2 Otay Park 5.2
Chula Vista Reinstra Ball 6.0
Community Park 12.9 Fields
Palomar Park 3.1
SDG&E Park 18.0
Connoley Park .65
Holiday Estates I .26
Holiday Estates II .26
Lancerlot Park .10
Sherwood Park .28
203.4 129.45
[gmoc - parkinv4.tab - 12-22-95]
-
II
-
-
':;
(
ATTACHMENT C
~
Ian Diego
Bay
Chula Vista Women's Club
357 'G' Street
691-5085 (For information)
Lauderbach Community Center
333 Oxford Street
691-5276
Lorna Verde Pool
1420 Lorna Lane
691-5081
Norman Park Senior Citizen Center
270 'F' Street
691-5086
Loma Verde Recreation Center
1420 Lorna Lane
691-5082
Parkway Community Center
373 Park Way
691-5083
Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course
4475 Bonita Road 479-4141
18-hole championship course, pro shop,
putting and chipping greens, driving range,
carts, snack bar, club house and restaurant.
Municipal Courts
Chula Vista Tennis Center
Eucalyptus Park
Rancho del Rey Park
Sunbow Park
Terra Nova Park
# of courts
4 (lighted)
4 (lighted)
2
3 (lighted)
2 (lighted)
@t
I
27
d~ b\\l-
Parkway Gymnasium
385 Park Way
691-5084
Parkway Pool
385 Park Way
691-5088
School District Courts # of courts
Southwestern College 10
Bonita Vista High School 6
Castle Park High School 6
Chula Vista High School 6 (4Iighted)
EastLake High School 10 (8 lighted)
Hilltop High School 6 (4 lighted)
7:.~-
~{)(cfIJ 0 \. X
Ok.AFt
DRAFT
PARKS AND RECREATION
3.7 Parks and Recreation
3.7.1 Existine Threshold Policy
Goal
To provide a diverse and flexible park system which meets both the active and
passive recreational needs of the citizens of Chula Vista.
Ob1ective
Provide pu?licparka~dr~creati()nalopportunitiesin a timely manner, implementing
a five year 19l),g"M\tlg~;~~t:~q#p~~~~ilq~~I#~11igij master plan which describes the
location, facility improvements, and funding program for proposed neighborhood and
community parks.
Threshold Standard
Population ratio: Three (3) acres of neighborhood and community park land with
appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents citY"\\1id~ east of IBterstate
~. ...................
Implementation Measures
Should the GMOC determine that the Threshold Standard is not being satisfied,
then the City Council shall formally adopt and fund tactics to bring the park and
recreation system into conformance iP.~IQ~9~l)~'Y-itllt1l~f(tU~gh
'WesternCbUlaVista
Itl$teq~i~cticlt~~r~~!~~~~npj9~ijQi~ppj~ii~A!~~t91t9m~~ppgt~e
~ljr~e($)aFre$p~t~;~J:~q~A~.gq~~ti!~p~~~ijW~~t9i~P~~~~r~t~
8O~fr~e~y.*p6s~9~fi~i~l;i~es,!~~jj'l~19Jpllis~9.~Bq~Y~t9pm~illp~~&til~
~aat\nelti()p~wliic.~p~~7~~1~~m9ilw~m~~t9ftJj~,~re~P91q~~9~tQi11
1~~!,ij.n4th~r~qy.my.~g~t,f~4t~ti:.prg~~t\iilY.~~r~s'l1n~~lj~~~~~~~pYltHl~
ei.l;Bl.flr&.I..
~~M-1v1(.)f+~~"I~'lIMigyI!'i~~:"P!9g~#~.~~P9i~~g'f.9ig~li~~~~~rll.
elf }'" .....Jlt. '. '. .... ...If.... If ........mr.~...s.tt(S "')'if.~'f
inei'~enl~~I~I::j~ij~.i'llI111jl:jl"ir~B.i;~}g;~:~Wd
DRAF.!l
.lillll.i~'~i!iil.
~
EasteiliChUli'Misfi
............................'..........'.............'.....'..............
~Dijm;9PP~~m~..~~t:l9:,J,i~PP"~~.~Ip.~Yf~~~~qpl~P!~#P
pgpHl~lj9Agf~9~~fl~::'ltP~JP~~~~~~t~t~~r GH9<>Dsiructlon .orother
acfuals()luticin~t9f:ml~I~HshaIi be HscheClulerl . to commence within three
years. If construc:tloDo{ needed new park and recreation facilities is not
started within three years of the deficiency reported by the GMOC, then the
City Council shall, within 60 days of the GMOC's report, schedule and hold
a public hearing for the purpose of adopting a moratorium on the acceptance
of new tentative map applications ~~~lp~17~g~, based on all of the following
criteria:
1. That the moratorium is limited to an area wherein a causal
relationship to the problem has been established; and,
2.
That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure to a specifically
identified impact.
-
Should a moratorium be established, the time shall be used to expeditiously
prepare specific mitigation measures for adoption which are intended to bring
the condition into conformance. Any such moratorium shall be in effect until
construction of the needed new park and recreation facilities has commenced.
(M:\HOME\PI.ANNING\PIP\PR- THR-l.STD)
--..
P<QOG;rJOC~
--;-
u
Sweetwater Union High School District
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vlata, California 91911.2896
(619) 691-5500
Division of Planning and Facilities
February 6, 1996
R~,.... ;..
-.....
fEBO
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
City of Chula Vista Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
PL[:\
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
Re: 1995 GMOC Report
Sweetwater Union High School District
Enclosed please find the Sweetwater Union High School District's response to the City of
Chula Vista GMOC growth forecast. It is presented in two parts. Part one responds to the
impact projected growth will have on classroom space, and part two responds to the GMOC
concerns raised in last year's final report as well as those requested in your December 11,
1995, letter to me.
I look forward to meeting with the committee. It would be very helpful if the schools issue was
first on the agenda. Feel free to call me if you have any questions.
sm~~
Thomas Silva
Director of Planning
Ts/ml
I:??
Part One: District's Response to Forecast Development
.-..
Introduction
The Sweetwater Union High School District encompasses 155 square miles and includes five
local governmental jurisdictions. Ten regular day schools are located in the City of Chula
Vista. They include five high schools, one continuation high school, three middle schools and
one junior high school. For the purpose of this response to the GMOC committee, an
assessment of the potential impact to the continuation high school was not done since is not
based upon any particular school attendance area.
Between the 1994/95 and 1995/96 school years the district's enrollment increased by 651
students, a 21,4 percent increase. With the exception of Eastlake High School, all high schools
are operating above capacity. Bonita Vista Middle School exceeded its total capacity by 55
students. The other middle and junior high schools are either at or below capacity. The
attached California Basic Enrollment Data Systems (CBEDS) chart lists the schools, the current
CBEDS enrollment and school site capacity status.
A total of 15,502 students, 52 percent of the district's total enrollment, attend schools located in
the city; 5,491 are middle/junior high school students, and 10,011 are high school students.
The following table shows the change in student enrollment from last year to this year.
95 / 96 94 / 95 Enroll. Percent
School CBEDS CBEDS Increase Increase -
Bonita Vista High 2,332.00 2,257.00 75.00 3.32
Castle Park High 2,154.00 2,185.00 (31.00) (1.42)
Chula Vista High 2,093.00 2,063.00 30.00 1.45
Eastlake High 1,557.00 1,367.00 190.00 13.90
Hilltop High 1,875.00 1,767.00 108.00 6.11
Subtotal 10,011.00 9,639.00 372.00 3.86
Bonita Vista Middle 1,549.00 1,478.00 71.00 4.80
Castle Park Middle 1,284.00 1,247.00 37.00 2.97
Chula Vista Junior 1,425.00 1,410.00 15.00 1.06
Hilltop Middle 1,233.00 1,226.00 7.00 0.57
Subtotal 5,491.00 5,361.00 130.00 2.42
District CBEDS Total 29,596.00 28,945.00 651.00 2.25
Percent of District Total 52.38 51.82
It is evident that Bonita Vista High, Bonita Vista Middle and Hilltop High schools have
experienced significant gains in enrollment. Eastlake High School experienced a 14 percent
increase; however, the school is only at 65 percent total capacity. There is classroom space for
approximately 850 additional students.
-
Sweetwater Union High School District GMOC Repon
Februtlry, 1996
Page 1
\ (i i.1
A. 12 - 18 Month Projections
As in previous years' responses to the GMOC, the district determined the potential impact the
"Final Permit" 12 - 18 Month development forecast would have on schools and then distributed
those impacts to each school site attendance area. It is important to note that, with the
exception of Salt Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch, all development proposals
mitigated their impact to schools through participation in a community facilities district.
A total of 444 new students should enter district schools after build-out of the 18 month
projection. Bonita Vista High, Eastlake High and Bonita Vista Middle School will absorb 96
percent of this enrollment growth. Approximately 64 percent, 284 students, will have Bonita
Vista Middle and Bonita Vista High as their resident schools. The following table lists the
projected student distribution by school.
School
1 st 6 Mas 2nd 6 Mas 3rd 6 Mas !Q1al
Bonita Vista High
Eastlake High
Castle Park High
Chula Vista High
Bonita Vista Middle
Chula Vista Junior
Castle Park Middle
27
31
52 52 131
66 47 144
1 3 4
3 4 7
63 49 151
2 2 4
1 2 3
188 159 444
39
Total
97
% Total
30
32
1
2
34
1
1
100
As discussed in the introduction, Bonita Vista High and Bonita Vista Middle schools have
enrollment which exceeds classroom space. These schools will have difficulty accepting new
students unless new classrooms are provided. Eastlake High School has sufficient capacity to
reduce the overcrowding at Bonita Vista High School to an acceptable level, and the district
anticipates the opening of a new middle school in the Fall of 1998. The opening of this new
school will reduce overcrowding at Bonita Vista Middle School.
In summary, development in the eastern territories continues to impact district facilities, but the
impact is temporary and manageable.
B. Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast
The Series 8 Regional Growth Forecast identifies projected long term development. According
to the table included in the GMOC letter to the district, an average of 1,650 dwelling units will
be added each year. Past permit issuance history suggests that the market can only absorb
approximately 1,000 to 1, 100 units per year. This would result in approximately 305 new
students per year. Of the anticipated 305 new students, 200 should enter high school and 105
shall enter middle school on an annual basis.
It is recommended by the State Department of Education that a new school be operational when
there is a demand for one half of the required classroom space. In other words, a new high
school should be ready to open doors when a cumulative total of 6,000 units are occupied. The
threshold for a new middle school is 7,000 units. Given the fact that the development identified
Sweetwater Union High School District GMOC Report
February, 1996
Page 2
in the 12 - 18 month forecast will be absorbed by Eastlake High School, a new high school
would be required in approximately seven years. The site should be prepared, that is rough
graded with utilities and roads brought to the site, in approximately five years.
~.
The scope of Otay Ranch SPA I makes it necessary that a high school be included in the plan.
Currently, two high schools and two middle schools are a part of the approved Otay Ranch
General Development Plan. They are located in Villages 7 and 11. The 5,800 :t units in SPA
I require that the timing for the new school be accelerated and that it be located in SPA I. In
preliminary meetings with the Baldwin Company, the district has expressed a desire that the
high school be located either at the southwest portion of Village 1 or the northwest portion of
Village 2. A copy of the proposed Otay Ranch Plan is enclosed for reference.
In summary, Eastlake High School can accommodate proposed development anticipated during
the 1990 - 2000 phase but not the remaining fifteen years. A new high school will be needed to
accommodate the remaining phases. Because the cumulative growth proposed for the eastern
territories fills Eastlake High School, the Otay Ranch SPA I should be amended to include a
new high school.
Part Two: District's Response to GMOC Concerns
A. Issues identified in the 1994 GMOC Report:
Issue:
That the city continue to support the district's efforts to fully mitigate school impacts
in the Salt Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch Projects.
-
Response: The Baldwin Company formally requested that the district initiate the proceedings
necessary to establish a Mello Roos Community Facilities District for the Otay
Ranch SPA I project, and the funds to pay the consultant's fees are forthcoming.
Mitigation agreements for San Miguel Ranch and Salt Creek Ranch have yet to be
developed. The district requests that the city continue its support to fully mitigate
the impact these projects have on district classroom space.
Issue: That a mitigation agreement for the Bayfront project be presented to the district.
Response: The developer(s) of the Bayfront plan have yet to provide the district with a
mitigation agreement. The district requests that the city continue its support and
urge the developer(s) to present a solution prior to any future approvals.
B. Issues identified for inclusion in the 1995 GMOC Report:
Issue:
Status of the SourcePoint Study
Response: The SourcePoint Study is complete, and the district has accepted its findings. The
district believes that the formation of a council/school boards sub-committee may
lead to policy decisions which cannot be attained in its four remaining local
governmental jurisdictions. It is of the utmost importance that the district be
consistent in its application of the developer fee program and the administration of
the Mello- Roos Community Facilities District program.
-
Sweetwater Union High School District GMOCReport
February, 1996
Page 3
~')
Issue: Identify/Discuss how consideration of year round multi-track education will be
handled.
Response: The district supports year-round sinile-track education. Three high schools and
two middle schools currently operate on a year-round schedule. Although its
schedule has yet to be determined, the new middle school is designed to
accommodate year-round education should the board decide to take that approach.
The district has found that the community does not support the implementation of a
year-round multi-track program nor are there sufficient funds available to provide
the necessary labs to make such a schedule feasible.
C. New District Concerns:
Issue:
Otay Ranch SPA I: The district requests that the city support the inclusion of a
high school site in the Otay Ranch SPA I plan and encourage the Otay Ranch
Project Planning Team to support a proposal amendment.
Issue:
Relocation of the Fifth Avenue Site: The district requests that the city continue to
support its efforts to relocate the current education center from Fifth Avenue to the
Third A venue site and assist in the identification of an acceptable site to house the
maintenance, transportation and warehouse facilities.
Issue:
Joint Use Agreement: The district encourages the city to endeavor to cooperatively
develop a joint use agreement for the new middle school and Voyager Park prior to
the opening of either facility.
Sweetwater Union High School District GMOC Report
February, 1996
Page 4
. / r7
Attachment 1
Sweetwater Union High School District
.-,
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91911-2896
(619) 691-5500
Division of Planning and Facilities
Sweetwater Union High School District
1995 / 1996 CBEDS Enrollment
1995/96 Total I No. Over School Site Student Enrollment Distribution
School CBEOS Student Total Capacity Distribution Regular I Ungraded I Ungraded I Adults in
Site Name Enroll. Capacity . Capacity Trailer I Relo I Permenant Day Sch. Elem. Sec. K - 12
-. I
Bonita Vista High 2.332 1,932 400 120 1,812 2,251 80 1
Castle Park High 2,159 1,808 351 240 1,568 2,149 7 3
Chula Vista High 2,093 1.836 257 480 1,356 2.086 7
Eastlake High 1.557 2.413 (856) 720 1.693 1 .483 74
Hilltop High 1.875 1.508 367 120 1,388 1,865 8 2
Mar Vista High 1.896 1.540 356 240 1.300 1.855 I 41
Montgomery High 2.205 1.750 455 480 1,270 2,118 72 15
Palomar High 400 0 400 394 1 5
Southwest High 2,247 1.994 253 780 1.214 2,239 8
Sweetwater High 2,271 2.258 13 300 1,958 2,233 35 3
I
I
Subtotal 19,035 17.039 1,996 0 3,480 13.559 18.673 1 332 29
Bonita Vista Middle 1.549 1.494 55 210 1,284 1.521 28 I
Castle Park Middle 1.284 1 .456 (172) 1.456 1.278 6 I
Chula Vista Junior 1.425 1.430 (5) 360 1,070 1.414 5 6
Granger Junior 906 1.096 (190) 1,096 892 6 8
Hilltop Middle 1.233 1,506 (273) 120 1,386 1.206 27
Mar Vista Middle 1.228 1.246 (18) 1.246 1.226 2
Montgomery Middle 1.002 1.674 (672) 1.674 962 39 1
National City Middle 760 982 (222) 60 922 757 3
Southwest Junior 1.174 1.188 {14l 360 828 1.169 3 2
, I I
Subtotal 10.561 12.072 I (1.511 ) 360 750 , 0.962 10,425 119 I 17 I
I
I21al ~ z.a..l11 ~ J.ti..Q ~ all! aw .12.Q I ill 2S
-
Notes:
Ungraded Elem. and Sec. represents the number of students enrolled in the Special Abilities Cluster (SAC) program.
-
~,.it;;;ja~E'O ~'a"'l:.Jarv 18. 1996
ALLC8EDS.XlS J /(
. ""'!SW;;iW;t;i~iijgiQota_JIDlsl;ii'
IMPERIAL
BEACH
"'~
.:.
>
"
N
w
5
JUNIOR HIGHS &
MIDDLE SCHOOLS
SENIOR HIGHS
ADULT SCHOOLS
NESTOR
~
'"
c
!
992
'..TEII....T10....L 801l0EII
VNITeOST..TlS
...",CO
: i=
1'- ;
? j.;;.
;; ;H!
1 1-:.~ 1
! i~~ ~
.. i ;.. ~;-; ;~
.~ , < i ~ j:!5!~!
~ 3 ~ 1 1 jih~
~ ~ . h:-.
~ .. l ~ , I ~;~iJ
, c J ~ j
;;A ~ .. :> a...
: ~J :~:I ('"' <:: OJ ~ [!J @J Ii)
~, ~ w.
I
i j ~ ~
~ I ~ I
f j ~ I i J
,:: , ]
J j. . ! ~ J
, j ~ ~ ..
; 1 ]
j ! ! 3 t. l
~
q rf1 0 00 ro CJG B G; tI, ,;;-'
LJ ~ u' -..!.
1 J J j
. f
i 1 1 ..
. . oi J 1
I I f 1 t .
oi 1 t . < 1
'0 !! , i 4 I i
. I 1 .
.. ; !! l , ~
c:: 1 u <
! ~ I I
Q) ~ i f ; i i
! . ! !
0> - 0 I - ;..
(l) ,~. ~, ~ rnG [!] r.;i j7 : c;
--i . >, :-' =! 21 ~ ~I .'
Attachment 2
% ji
lrul < .
.....:l I
c::;:l....
S'! ~ .. ~ -,
C/:)
II ::::> )1
J
.. Cl
I :z:: J!
:s
~ If
C/:) &:
2i:;
Cl
<"..:)
:r::
u
z
~
~
E-"
0
:-::;;t
---1: ~
.~-.~,
I' ;~:.:J
;:j
.
;J:.
~
.
..
;:)
'a
C
.=l
~
..
...
C
o
u
.
III
-,
~
H z
0
e. $
~ C/) ..
:::r:: . -
>.-
.. .
. ,
u- 0..,
e.!'
~ z. U::j
'" ,~~
~ t) ~. ..,-
.,..!--
=1
~ ~.i
;:J
6 ~
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Planning Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 15, 1996
TO: Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission
FROM: Chula Vista Elementary School District
RE: SCHOOL THRESHOLD REPORT - RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12-1
MONTH GROWTH FORECAST
RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ON 1995 ANNUAL REPORT
Last year the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC)
recommended, and the City Council made the finding, that the Chula Vista
Elementary School District was in compliance with the City's Threshold for
Schools. The following issues/situations discussed in last year's report continue
to be relevant this year:
1 . Most schools west of 1-805 continue to operate at or above permanent
capacity.
2. The District will continue to accommodate enrollment increases in these
areas through a combination of relocatable classrooms, classroom
reconfigurations and busing.
3. As of January 5, 1996, a total of 385 children throughout the District were
being overflow bused due to overcrowding at their home schools.
4. Enrollment increases east of 1-805 resulting from new development are
anticipated to be met through new school construction and/or expansion
of existing facilities (relocatable classrooms), which will be funded by
homeowner paid Mello-Roos taxes or other full reimbursement
mechanism
5. Indirect impacts on student enrollment from non-residential development
continue to be an issue. The joint Chula Vista Elementary School District,
Sweetwater Union High School District, and City study prepared by
SourcePoint has been completed. It is anticipated that the three
governing bodies will review the findings sometime this year, and utilize
January 15, 1996
Chula Vista GMOC
Response to 1994 Annual Report
Page 2 of 5
-,
them as the basis for developing appropriate and equitable mitigation
strategies so that impacts on school facilities from all new development
are fully mitigated.
6. There has been no activity relative to the Baytront project in terms of
interaction with the District. It is still critical that when this project is
processed, any approvals be conditioned on full mitigation of all impacts
on schools, from both residential and non-residential development.
7.
The District continues to be interested in acquiring the vacant four (4)
acres adjacent to Feaster School for expansion of that facility. Lack of
funds is still the obstacle to acquiring the property. In 1989, discussions
regarding acquisition of the site were initiated by district staff with the
property owner and Chula Vista Mayor Greg Cox. At that time, proposals
for commercial development along Broadway and "E" Street were
considered to help finance acquisition of the property. However, for
various reasons, mainly financial, these discussions never reached
fruition. The Board of Education, on December 12, 1995, authorized staff
to enter into formal discussions with the property owner.
-
8. The District continues a variety of ongoing activities to plan proactively for
growth and improvement of school facilities. These activities include:
a) development tracking and phasing monitoring;
b) school growth planning;
c) boundary/attendance area adjustments;
d) residency verification;
e) requests for city assistance in obtaining full mitigation for new
development;
f) responding to notices of proposed development from jurisdictions
within District boundaries and recommending full mitigation;
g) participation in the State Modernization Program; and
h) assuring that all new development fully mitigates its impacts on
school facilities.
RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12 - 18 MONTH FORECAST
Proiects Within Sweetwater Authoritv Area
Enrollments in western Chula Vista continue to increase. Of the 1598 dwelling
units anticipated to reach occupancy between July 1, 1995, and December 31,
1996, 49 are located in the Sweetwater Authority service area. At the average
-
January 15, 1996
Chula Vista GMOC
Response to 1994 Annual Report
Page 3 of 5
District-wide student generation rate of 0.3 students/unit, 16 new students will be
generated. Table 1 indicates the number of units, new students, and home
schools.
TABLE 1
School No. Units New Students
Rice 16 5
Mueller 36 11
TOTAL 52 16
Even though most schools west of 1-805 are operating at or above permanent
capacity, some space does exist in certain schools at various grade levels.
Utilizing various methods to maximize facilities utilization, such as busing,
eliminating or relocating non-essential uses currently conducted in regular
classrooms, reconfiguration of classes, etc., the District will be able to
accommodate these 16 children next year.
Both last year's and this year's projections do not contain a listing of non-
residential projects. This omission is of concern to the District as we believe
non-residential development contributes to increases in student enrollment. We
again suggest that non-residential projections be included in the City's annual
forecasts so that impacts can be quantified and accommodation plans
formulated.
Proiects Within the Otav Water District Service Area
The District has five Mello-Roos Community Facilities District (CFD's) in place,
four of which are project specific and in Chula Vista's Eastern Territories. The
fifth is a generic district and includes several smaller, non-contiguous projects
throughout the District. As new large projects are proposed, new CFD's or other
full reimbursement financing mechanisms, will be created to finance site
acquisition and needed elementary facilities. It is anticipated that these
mechanisms will be implemented for the following proposed projects: 1) Salt
Creek Ranch; 2) Otay Ranch; 3) Rancho San Miguel; and 4) Otay Mesa (City of
San Diego). Miscellaneous smaller projects will continue to be annexed to CFD
NO.5.
City projections for the area served by the Otay Water District between July 1,
1995 - December 31, 1996, indicate that a total of 1549 new dwelling units will
reach occupancy. At the average District-wide student generation rate of 0.3
students/unit, 465 new students can be expected to be generated during the
January 15, 1996
Chula Vista GMOC
Response to 1994 Annual Report
Page 4 of 5
-.
forecast period. Approximately 96 percent of these units are in the EastLake,
Rancho del Rey, Telegraph Canyon Estates and East Palomar Estates, all of
which are within CFD's. Therefore, financing for new facilities in these areas is
in place. Clear View is the home school for the remaining 4.4 percent, or
approximately 20 children, and they can be accommodated at that school.
The EastLake Community now has two elementary schools, EastLake and
Olympicview, which serve that community and the Salt Creek J development.
Discovery School serves the majority of Rancho del Rey, with three
neighborhoods scheduled to attend Clear View. Children from Telegraph
Canyon Estates attend Tiffany School, and those from East Palomar Estates will
attend Palomar School.
DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
As described earlier in this report, past reports to the GMOC have reported
various activities undertaken by the District to plan proactively for growth and
improve school facilities. In addition to these activities, the District continues to
pursue participation in CFD NO.5 for smaller, noncontiguous projects. However, -.
unless the project requires a legislative act on the part of the City, participation
is voluntary. All project proponents are notified of this option in lieu of payment
of school fees. Funds collected from CFD NO.5 are used throughout the District
to assist in housing children generated from these projects.
The District is still awaiting passage of a State school facilities bond in order to
receive funding for modernizing eleven of our oldest schools. The Legislature,
on January 4, 1996, passed a measure to place a $2.25 billion bond for K-12
facilities and $975 billion for higher education facilities on the March, 1996,
supplemental ballot. Should the electorate pass this bond, modernization can
commence.
Last year we reported on Senate 8ill1 066, which would have limited the amount
districts can collect as mitigation from residential development to $2.72/square
foot and eliminate the "Mira/HartlMurrietta" authority permitting collection of full
mitigation. Fortunately this bill was defeated, and "Mira/HartlMurrietta" remains
in place. The City's support in opposing S8 1066 was much appreciated.
One of the GMOC's recommendations to the City Council last year was:
UThat the City Council forward a communication to the District Board
suggesting establishment of a task force to study the efficacy and
practicality of establishing multi-track programming in the
elementary schools."
-.
, pJ'
January 15, 1996
Chula Vista GMOC
Response to 1994 Annual Report
Page 5 of 5
Although this communication was not received, the District has formed a
committee to develop facility use and program implementation plans and policies
which would appropriately serve enrollment needs in each school attendance
area. Plans to accommodate students may incorporate traditional, single track,
and multi-track year-round calendars. This effort is ongoing.
Other recommendations to the Council included:
1) That the City promote prompt completion of the cooperative
study underway between the City, Sweetwater Union High School
District, Chula Vista Elementary School District and SourcePoint to
identify the impacts of new residential and non-residential
development, and demography upon City schools;
2) Based upon the study's results, the City Council should direct
that staff expedite development of proposed mitigation strategies for
consideration and adoption by the City Council and both school
boards. The study, along with at least a draft of the resulting
proposed mitigation strategies, should be adopted not later than the
Fall of 1995 so that they can be available when the GMOC
commences its next review in October, 1995; and
3) That the City Council invite the district boards to form a joint task
force to discuss mitigation strategies subsequent to release of the
SourcePoint study."
The SourcePoint study was completed earlier this year and presented to the
Chula Vista School Board on October 3, 1995. We are not aware that either of
the other participants have presented the study to their respective governing
bodies, and, to our knowledge, no work has commenced on draft mitigation
strategies. This should be a priority for the three participants, along with
formation of a joint task force.
The District welcomes the opportunity to continue to work with the GMOC and
City to assure that elementary school facilities will be available at the time of
need to serve all children in Chula Vista.
L:gmoc-95
~~~\ 'f, ~
MEMORANDUM
t t_ c: ",'-;;~C
February IS, 1996
File: 0610-95-GY051
TO:
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning
Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works DirectorAJ~
City Engineer r
Steve Thomas, Senior Civil Engineer ~
1995 Traffic Monitoring Program Final Report - GMOC
Annual Review of Threshold Compliance
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached, you will find the Final Report for the 1995 Traffic
Monitoring Program (TMP) study. The purpose of the 1995 TMP Study
is to assess the operating performance of the City's arterial
street system. This is accomplished by measuring the Level of
Service (LOS) in terms of travel time (speeds) encountered on
arterial streets during periods of high traffic activity (AM and PM
commuting hours and the noon hour). The LOS of the arterial
segments are tested for compliance with the Threshold Standards of
the Growth Management Plan. The Traffic Growth Management
Threshold Standards specify that LOS C or better, as measured by
observed average travel speed, shall be maintained on all
signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D
can occur for no more than any two hours of the day. This 1995
report provides a summary of the technical data and analysis
performed for the travel time and speed surveys conducted for this
year's program. This year's program re-evaluated each arterial
segment from last year's study which was found to operate at LOS C
or less in at least one direction during each affected time period
(AM, Mid-day and PM). Additional studies were also performed on H
St. from 1-5 to I-80S and on East H St. from I-80S to Rutgers Ave.
to maintain current information on these traffic corridors through
the City. The travel time studies conducted for the 1995 TMP were
performed from the beginning of March to the middle of September
1995.
The attached Final Report contains the following information:
Project Background
Project Methodology
1995 TMP Study Results and Analysis
Arterial Interchange Segments
Conclusions and Recommendations
Appendices - Revised Traffic Element
Arterial LOS & Segment Classifications
Previous TMP Study Results
Additional 1995 TMP LOS data
1995 TMP
2
February 15, 1996
1995 TMP RESULTS
~
This year's program indicates that all arterial segments studied
during each time period operate at LOS C or better except for the
following segments which operate at LOS D:
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St., southbound) - operates at LOS D
(0.2 MPH below LOS C) for 1/2 hour in the evening.
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd., northbound) _
operates at LOS D for 3 1/2 hours during the day (1 hour in the
AM, a 1/2 hour at mid-day and 2 hours in the evening) due to
congestion at the intersection of East H St./Otay Lakes Road.
This conclusion is based on an HCM road classification of class
I arterial. As discussed in detail in the Report, staff does
not believe that the class I designation is reflective of the
actual characteristics of the segment. Staff believes that a
class II arterial more accurately reflects these
characteristics. Based on a class II designation, the segment
is operating within Level of Service C or better.
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd., southbound) _
operates at LOS D (0.3 MPH below LOS C) for 1/2 hour in the
morning. As discussed above, staff does not believe this is
reflecti ve of the actual operating Level of Service for the
segment.
-
All other arterial segments studied for the 1995 TMP operate at LOS
C or better. However, data indicates that the following four
segments operate in the lower 1/3 of the LOS C range of average
travel speeds:
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St., southbound) - operates at 1.9
MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour in the middle of the day.
East B St. (SW College Entrance - Rutgers Ave.)
Eastbound - operates at 0.6 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour at
mid-day and at 1.3 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour in the
morning.
Westbound - operates at 0.8 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour
at mid-day; also operates at 1.7 MPH above LOS D for 1 hour
in the evening.
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.)
Northbound - In addition to the LOS D condition noted above,
this segment also operates at LOS C (within 1 MPH of LOS D)
for 1 1/2 hours during the day. For one half hour of this
......
1995 TMP
3
February 15, 1996
lower level LOS C condition, this segment operates at 0.2 MPH
above LOS D.
Southbound - In addition to the LOS D condition noted above,
this segment also operates at a lower level of LOS C (2 MPH
above LOS D) for a half hour at mid-day and at 1.3 MPH above
LOS D for a half hour in the morning.
Palomar St. (1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway)
Eastbound - operates at 2 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour at
mid-day and at 1.5 MPH for a 1/2 hour in the evening.
Palomar St. (1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway)
Westbound - operates at 1.6 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour
at mid-day and at 1.2 MPH above LOS D for a 1/2 hour in the
evening.
The results of this year's program indicate that all arterial
segments studied during each time period have satisfied the
Threshold Standards for the 1995 TMP with one exception. Since the
LOS D condition for the northbound direction of Otay Lakes Rd.
(between East H St. and Telegraph Canyon Rd.) occurred for more
than two hours out of the day, this segment would not meet the
City's Threshold Standards for a class I arterial.
For northbound Otay Lakes Rd., this condition is primarily due to
congestion at Otay Lakes Rd./East H St. due to the high volume of
left turning movements at the intersection. The City currently has
a CIP project planned for the intersection of Otay Lakes Rd./ East
H St. which will add dual left turn lanes for northbound and
southbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. This project is currently
under design and is scheduled to be constructed in the summer of
1996. An intersection simulation capacity study indicates that
this impacted segment will be ameliorated once this proj ect is
completed because this project will increase the capacity of the
intersection and, therefore, will improve the LOS for Otay Lakes
Road.
For the southbound direction, the apparent LOS D condition is
primarily due to delay at Otay Lakes Rd./Telegraph Canyon Rd. due
to the high volume of eastbound to northbound left turning vehicles
heading for Southwestern College. Additional factors contributing
to delay for southbound traffic at this location include the fact
that this is a Tee intersection where southbound traffic accounts
for only 12.4% of the total entering traffic volume from 7:30 to
8:00 AM when this LOS D condition exists. Therefore, the traffic
signal is timed to serve the higher traffic volumes on the
eastbound and westbound legs of the intersection (936 and 690
vehicles respectively) at the expense of the lower volume
,',,- )
1995 TMP
4
February 15, 1996
southbound leg (231 vehicles). The delay at this intersection does
not impact the entire length of the segment. Also, most of the
southbound traffic turns right onto Telegraph Canyon Rd. and,
therefore, does not experience substantial delay. However, when
this delay is combined with the small amount of additional delay
created by the new signal at Otay Lakes Rd./Gotham St., it results
in an apparent LOS D condition for this segment during that half
hour AM period (based on a class I arterial classification). This
condition for southbound traffic is not sufficient to cause
threshold standards to not be met once the project at Otay Lakes
Rd./East H St. is completed.
It should be mentioned here, that the problem with the lower Level
of Service on this segment of Otay Lakes Rd. (in both directions)
is influence by several factors. One factor is the length of the
segment (3395'). The shorter the segment, the greater the impact
delay at one or two intersections has on the overall segment LOS.
A second factor is the presence of Southwestern College which
generates large amounts of traffic during short periods of time as
students go to and from school for their classes.
Another factor is the classification of the segment itself. Class
I arterials are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range from
35 to 45 mph and the number of signalized intersections per mile
are less than four. There is no parking and there is generally no
access to abutting property. The segment of Otay Lakes Rd. from
East H St. to Telegraph Canyon Rd. is classified as class I but
there is access to abutting residential and commercial properties
on the east side of the street. There is also parking along part
of the east side of this segment. The speed limit in this area is
40 mph which limits free flow traffic speed under all except the
lightest traffic conditions, and with the new signal at Otay Lakes
Rd./Gotham St., this brings the number of signals per mile to four.
Based on these characteristics, this segment should be analyzed as
a class II arterial rather than as a class I. Class II arterials
are roadways where free flow traffic speeds range from 30 to 35
mph, the number of signalized intersections per mile range between
four and eight, there is some parking and access to abutting
properties is limited. Because of the nature of this segment of
Otay Lakes Rd., the City will in the future analyze this segment as
a class II arterial rather than as a class I. When the road
classification is taken into consideration, this segment no longer
operates at a Level of Service worse than IICII.
In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1995 TMP also
reevaluated the LOS of those arterial interchange segments found by
the 1994 TMP to be operating at LOS C or less (during each affected
time period). Although these segments are not subject to the
Threshold Standards, LOS measurements on these segments are a
growth management consideration in situations where proposed
developments have a significant impact at interchanges. Therefore,
these segments were included for study in this year's TMP program.
.....
.-,
......
'\
1995 TMP
5
February 15, 1996
The results of this year's program indicate that all arterial
interchange segments studied are operating at LOS C or better
except for the following segments which operate at LOS D:
AM Period
Palomar St.
(Bay Blvd. - Industrial Blvd.) 8 - 9 AM
EB
Mid-day Period
H St.
H St.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM WB
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 12:30 - 1:30 PM EB & WB
PM Period
ESt.
H St.
Palomar St.
(Bay - Woodlawn)
(Bay - Woodlawn)
(Bay - Industrial)
4 - 5 PM
4 - 5 PM
4 - 5 PM
WB
WB* &
EB* &
5 - 6 PM
5 - 6 PM
WB
EB*
* Operating in the lower 1/2 of the LOS D range of average travel speeds.
Using existing guidelines which consider LOS A
acceptable for arterial interchange segments, all
studied during this year's THP were found to operate
Levels of Service.
through D as
the segments
at acceptable
It should be noted, however, that two of the segments (noted above
with an asterisk) are functioning in the lower half of the LOS D
range of average travel speeds during the evening peak period. The
LOS D speed range for class III arterials is 9 to 13 MPH.
Westbound H St. at 1-5 is functioning at 9.0 MPH (from 4 PM to 5
PM) which is the lower limit of LOS D. This, however, is not a
significant change from the previous year. In 1994, this segment
operated at an average speed of 9.3 MPH averaged over the 2 hour
period from 4 PM to 6 PM. This year, data was collected and
averaged hourly to yield results for the westbound direction of
this segment showing an average speed of 9.0 MPH from 4 PM to 5 PM
and 11.0 MPH from 5 PM to 6 PM. This means that the segment is
functioning significantly better during the second hour of the PM
peak period than during the first hour.
The other segment, eastbound Palomar St. at 1-5, is functioning at
10.5 MPH (from 4 PM to 6 PM). This speed is 2.5 MPH below LOS C
(for a class III arterial) and 1.5 MPH above the lower limit of LOS
D. This average travel speed (10.5 MPH) represents a decrease from
the 1994 level (13.1 MPH) back to the level this segment functioned
at in 1993 (10.4 MPH). If the data is analyzed in half hour
intervals, the results are as follows:
II
1995 TMP
6
F~bruary 15, 1996
Palomar St. (Bay - Industrial), Eastbound, Class III
.-.
Average
Time Speed ( MPH ) 1QS.
4:00 - 4:30 PM 11. 6 D
4:30 - 5:00 PM 9.4 D
5:00 - 5:30 PM 9.7 D
5:30 - 6:00 PM 11.6 D
These results show that the segment operates at the lower limit of
the LOS D range of average 'travel speeds for one hour and at the
middle of LOS D for one hour during the evening peak period. The
LOS D speed range for class III arterials is 9 to 13 MPR.
The 1996 TMP will study those arterial segments which were found to
operate at LOS C or less in 1995. Arterial interchange segments
operating at LOS D or less from the 1995 TMP will also be
restudied. Staff will also study additional' arterial segments
where there has been a significant (i.e. ~ 10%) increase in traffic
volume since they were last studied for a previous TMP report.
Arterial segments that were operating at better than LOS C and
which have not experienced a substantial increase in traffic volume
since they were last studied will probably not be in danger of not
meeting threshold standards and will not be restudied. Conducting
the 1996 TMP in this way (instead of restudying the entire PM _
period) will minimize the extensive field work required for the
program while still providing the information necessary to monitor
changing traffic conditions in the field.
H St./East H St.
Because of on-going concern regarding the H St./East H St. traffic
corridor, the entire length of H St./East H St. from 1-5 to Rutgers
Ave. was restudied during the 1995 TMP. The results of this study,
which are shown on the attached table, indicate that H St. and East
H St. are operating at acceptable Levels of Service. Thus,
operational changes are not deemed necessary at this time. Staff
will continue to monitor this traffic corridor and, when necessary,
will recommend any operational changes that may be appropriate to
maintain the highest Level of Service possible.
Attachments
.-.,.
(M:\HOME\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\M-95TMP1.SM)
o 01 0'1"" 0'1 ID .....l"'l LnCO
O:E~
Ho..~ ["-co Ol"'l N"" l"'l.....
er: 0.. ..... ..... NN l"'ll"'l NN
~IDtIl
0..
:E'~ UU In In In In UU
o..Ln...:l
O:E 01 NO N"" NID 0.....
8o..~ IDI' Nl"'l ..... ..... ""N
er: 0.. .......... NN l"'ll"'l NN
~l!)tIl
0.. I till
:E 0 UU In In In In InU
0..""...:1
0
l"'l0 l"'ll"'l .....0 ""..... I!) CO
><..~
~.....~ ["-0 l"'l..... IDl"'l 00'1
0 0.. .....N NN l"'ll"'l N.....
I ItIl
00
H l"'l till
:E"O UIn In In ~In UU
N...:I
..... ~) .r.:.r.:.r.:
tIl ~~~
0
..:I~ 0 I!).....ID
0 l"'l01 CO I!) ....."" CO["- ["-0'1 :EtIl NN.....
Ii ><..~
~N~ ["-["- Lnl"'l ""..... N.....
0.....0.. ..... ..... NN l"'ll"'l NN
I I 00
00
H l"'l 001 .r.:.r.:.r.:
rtltJ :E"O UU ~In In In UU ~o.o.
........:1 e e
tIl ..... ~I 'gl
CO ""0'1
~~ all::: NN.....
0. III
1-1 tiler: I I I
~= 0 0 ""..... ""I!) I!)..... 0'1"" NCOl"'l
rtl o~~ N..........
E-tE-t H ~ ["-0 ["-"" IDCO l"'ll"'l
~a er: 0.. .....N NN l"'ll"'l NN
~O'ItIl
0..
I till H
~~ ~co3 ut'O ~In ~~ UU HH
HHH
Olt/lt/l
tIl t/lt/lt/l
It'l o 01 I!)l"'l 1''''' 00'1 .......... III III III
0'\= 8~~ r-lr-lr-l
0\ 0'10 IDID I!) I!) Nl"'l UUU
1"'1 er: 0.. .....N NN l"'ll"'l NN
~cotll
0..
I till ~~ ~~
~["-3 In In uu
~I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
H
H t/l al
H ~ .lJ ~
al I:::
Ol ~ er: ~
t/l t/l
III In l-4
r-l "0 tIl r-l al
U l-4 r-l tn
-M I!) 0 .lJ ~
.r.: 0 u~ ;jH
. E-< co H er:H
~ H ~
~ OJ I tIlOl I{/)
t/l Ol .lJOl
~ III ~ I III I::: III
~ al ~ r-l ~r-l
. er: ~ OJ InU U
~ Ilr1 z~
tIl " In III r-l
. Z "0 I!) 0
~ l-4 ~ 0 U
OJ I!) -M lD co
I .r.: lIS I ~
= H E-< Ilr1 H tIl
CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
1995 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
FINAL REPORT
February 1. 5 I 1. 996
, I
{' I
L J
,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Project Background
Project Methodology
1995 TMP Study Results and Analysis
Arterial Interchange Segments
Conclusions and Recommendations
Appendices
1
Chula Vista Growth Management Plan
Revised Traffic Element (May 1991)
2
Arterial Level of Service
3
Arterial Segment Classifications
4
Summary of Previous TMP Study Results
5
1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
Graphics (Presented Hourly)
6
1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
(All Time Periods)
7
1995 TMP Arterial Segments
Operating at ~ Mid LOS C
~
1
2
3
24
39
1-1
2-1
3-1
4-1
5-1
6-1
7-1
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2-1
4-1
4-2
4-3
LIST OF TABLES
1995 TMP Arterial Performance
(All Time Periods)
1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
(All Time Periods)
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1994 VS. 1995 (AM PERIOD)
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1994 VS. 1995 (MID-DAY PERIOD)
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1994 VS. 1995 (PM PERIOD)
1995 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS (All Time Periods)
1995 TMP Arterial Interchange
Segment Performance
1995 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS Comparison 1994 VS. 1995
(All Time Periods)
Arterial Segment Classification Factors
Arterial Segment Level of Service
(All Time Periods)
Arterial Performance
(All Time Periods)
Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (All Time Periods)
---"
Page
3
5
14
15
17
25
31
32
..-.,
2-1
4-2
4-10
4-11
"'""
1~95 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
FINAL REPORT
PROJECT BACKGROUND
In 1988, the City of Chula Vista adopted a Growth Management Plan
to assist the City in assessing the environmental, fiscal and
operational impacts of proposed land development. In 1991, the
Traffic Element of this plan was revised to conform to the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for determining arterial
Level of Service (LOS) based on average travel speed. This Traffic
Element, which specifies threshold standards for acceptable Levels
of Service for arterial streets in the City, forms the basis for
the Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) which the City performs
annually. This revised Traffic Element, along with the approved
Arterial Network and Segment Classification Map, is presented in
Appendix 1.
Since 1992, the City has conducted travel time studies to assess
the operating LOS of arterial streets in the City. Over the last
three years, each of the three time periods (AM, Mid-day and PM)
have beert studied to provide baseline data City-wide. Each year
those segments found to be operating at LOS C or less in the
previous year's TMP were also restudied. This year's study
reevaluated all segments (from each of the three time periods)
which were operating at LOS C or less in the 1994 TMP. This Final
Report will describe the methodology and procedures involved in
conducting the 1995 TMP and will analyze and present the results
obtained from this study.
Additional information has also been included at the end of this
report to provide the following:
The revised Traffic Element, along with the approved Arterial
Network and Segment Classification Map (Appendix 1) .
A description of Arterial Level of Service and Arterial Segment
Classification Factors (Appendix 2) .
A description of Arterial Segment Classifications for the City's
existing arterial network (Appendix 3) .
A summary of results from studies performed in previous years
(Appendix 4) .
A graphic presentation of 1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS,
presented hourly (Appendix 5) .
A listing of Arterial Segment LOS (for all time periods) which
includes the most current information available for each segment
(Appendix 6) .
A listing of Arterial Segments (from the 1995 TMP) which were
found to be operating at ~ Mid LOS C (Appendix 7) .
1
11 J
PROJECT METHODOLOGY
.-,
The arterial network established for the 1992 TMP (Appendix 1,
Figure 1) was the basis for the field studies conducted during the
1995 TMP. Since travel time studies are very labor intensive, this
year's TMP was limited (city-wide) to an evaluation of all segments
during each of the three time periods (AM, Mid-day and PM) which
were found by last year's TMP to be operating at LOS C or less.
Data collection for the TMP used a special vehicle equipped with a
computer which recorded the distance traveled for each second of
time spent driving a segment. Subsequent analysis of the field
data generated information (on a directional basis) for travel
time, average speed, cruise speed, number of stops, and delay time
along the length of the segment.
Each segment evaluated during this year's program was driven for
the entire two hour time period under study. A sufficient number
of runs were done for each direction of each segment to provide a
statistically adequate sample with a minimum acceptable level of
confidence of 80% for each hour of the two hour study period.
Therefore, the data shown in this year's study is presented for
each hour of the two hour study period. Previous year studies
collected and presented data for the entire two hour study period,
instead of providing information on an hourly basis. This fact ~
must be taken into consideration when comparing data from this
year's study to information collected in previous years. Arterial
LOS values shown in the 1995 TMP were evaluated according to the
following HCM Level of Service values (from Appendix 1) :
LOS
A
B
C
D
E
F
AveraQ'e Travel SDeed (MPB)
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
.2.35 .2.30 .2.25
.2.28 .2.24 .2.19
.2.22 .2.18 .2.13
.2.1 7 .2.14 .2. 9
.2.13 .2.10 .2. 7
<13 <10 < 7
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report
209, Transportation Research Board, National
Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
.-,
2
\ f)
./~,\/.
1995 TMP STUDY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
This section of the report analyzes and presents the results of the
field studies for the arterial segments studied during the 1995
TMP. The results for the arterial interchange segments studied are
found in the section titled ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE .SEGMENTS which
follows this section of the report.
Since the 1995 TMP is the fourth year of a four year study cycle,
no city-wide studies were conducted to evaluate any entire time
period. Instead, the 1995 TMP studied all three time periods (AM,
Mid-day and PM) to evaluate LOS for those arterial segments found
by the 1994 TMP to be operating at or below LOS C in at least one
direction. H St./East H St., from 1-5 to Rutgers Ave., was also
studied to provide the most current information possible for this
traffic corridor.
As noted earlier in this report, the 1995 data shown is presented
for each hour of each two hour study period. Data from previous
year studies was not collected on an hourly basis and is presented
for the entire two hour period under study. This fact must be
considered when comparing 1995 data with data from previous years.
Arterial LOS is directional in nature and is based on both the
classification and the average travel speed of the arterial segment
under consideration. Table 1 summarizes the results of the 1995
TMP showing the number of arterial segments, listed by
classification, which conform to each Level of Service during each
of the three time periods studied (AM, Mid-day and PM) .
Table 1
1995 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
ALL TIME PERIODS
AM PERIOD
7 AM - 8 AM 8 AM - 9AM
CLASS CLASS
LOS I II III TOTAL I II III TOTAL
A 1 1 2 1 1
A/B* 1 1
B 2 2 1 1
B/C* 1 1
C 1 1 1 1
C/D* 1 1 1 1
D-F
* Indicates se~ents operating at different LOS's in different directions.
3
'\
~
.....
The following table presents the results of the 1995 TMP Study in
terms of arterial LOS / average speed and travel time for each
arterial segment studied during this year's program. Information
from this table on arterial segment Level of Service is presented
graphically in Appendix 5 (at the end of this report) for each hour
of the three peak traffic periods studied.
To compare LOS values for each of the three time periods studied by
the TMP please refer to Appendix 6 at the end of this report. This
appendix combines information from TMP studies conducted from 1992
through 1995 to provide LOS values and average travel speeds for
each arterial and arterial interchange segment studied during the
AM, Mid-day and PM peak periods. ......
4
0'l0'l O'lq< NLO Mq< MI.D
...:l 000 NN MLO 0\ M NM
0 I.DLO MM NO'l r--O\ LOLO
:> MM MM
~ O\M OOLO 00 Nr-- I.DI.D
~ ~~ MM I.DI.D MOO ON COq<
~~ LON q<0 NO MM q<M
0\
E-t MM NM LOLO NN MM
~ '0 q<M q<LO LOM O\q< MLO
00 ~~ r--O r--q< I.DOO MM Mq<
<re MN NN MM NN NN
00
00
0 UQ:l <Q:l << UU QU
...:l
...:l 0000 r--r-- O'lM MN NOO
0 O'lM LOr-- NO'l MN q<1.D
00 :> q<q< q<M r--M NN I.DO\
0 MM MN MM
...:l
~ ~~ I.DM LOM 0'l1.D COI.D 1.Dq<
~oo ~ ~~ r--O'l MM q<1.D oq< NOO
~Q ~~ .4J NM LOLO MN NM . LO M
t90 CO m ~
~H g =~ MM NN LOLO NN ~- MM
000:: .4J
N ...:l~ tf1 ~H
H ~ E-4H Gl [Jl
," <c:4 ~
\lJ .Q m[Jl LOM r--q< = 00'l MM Jo:[Jl I.DLO
.-l H~ ra1 t9~ ra[Jl as 10 LO
.0 o::~ 114 r-- :>~ 0'l0 I.DI.D .4J LOLO NM ..:Ir-l OM
ro ~H <c:4 ........10 MN NN ~ MM NN NN
[...; E-tE-t ~ 00 .r-l as >.U
~...:l .4J~ ra1 as-
m .4J
c:4...:l 00 0
~< 0 = Q:lQ:l << << UU QU
...:l
LO
O'l
0\
.M 0:: Q:lQ:l Q:lQ:l Q:lQ:l Q:lQ:l ~~
H ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
'Q
[Jl
~ ,lJ '- '0
~- alH 0:: to
0:: ~H >H ~"O
al < ~ s::
~ Q:l .[Jl [Jl ~ o 0
00 r-l[Jl [Jl[Jl ::c tJ
Q)
r-lro ~ 10 ~Ul
'0 LO Or-l alr-l Q) ..
~ 0 UU tnU 0. to
.~ 00 ,lJ- r-l Q)
to~
.c:- 1_ ~ ~ al Q) ~
E-tq< H LO CIl E-t- ......s::
0\ O'l q< ......-4
q< q< O'l XX
I "'"':'" I- I 0\ 10\ t .. s:: s::
,lJ.. '.-4'.-4
[Jl- ~- Q) Q)
[Jl0 0 ~O ~ ~ ~
OII.D M 0 ClS ClS
eO'l 'I.D alO 'CO
ItS .. al CO tno\ ,lJLO to to
o::r-- >0 ~M.. alN 00 .. ~~
......-4
N .ceq< r-l .. 00 s:: s::
~ q< r-l0 :I:M ::>::>
'Cl LOLt'l OM
~ 0 U ,lJ
LO .~ 00 [Jl
I ~ , ~ 10
H H 00 ~ .-iN
..::I .-IN 0'10'\
0 .-I~ 000
:> C"'--:I' ~oo
~
~ C"'-~
~ ~~ .-1M
:>:E it it -:I'~
0'\ ~~
.-1.-1
~ '0 .-IC"'-
00 ~~ it it .-10
<~ NN
tI.l
tI.l
0 it it ~~
..::I
..::I OO~ .-IN
tI.l 0 Lt)N NO'\
0 :> C"'--:I' ~O
..::I .-I
t ~~ ~ 0'1
~tI.l ~ ~:E M~
:EO ~~ .
~ it it ~M
oW t!)O 00 p:; . -
~H .-1.-1
~ tI.lp:: Q ~ - ~H
0 ..::I~ 0 >,H ttlH -..
tJ H ~ Q) H
<0. p:; -0 r-4(1) W C"'-.-I
H~ ~ t!>~ r-4(1) m ~ ~
N P:::E p,. C"'- :>~ lU It1 it it ON
~H <0. >r-4 o It1 NN
Q) ~~ ~ tJ r-4r-4
r-l ~..::I tI.l >,- lUtJ
.0 lU p,.-
It1 0...::1 tI.l ~
~ ~< 0 0 it it ~~
..::I
Lt)
0'1
0'1
.-I p:: ~~ ~~
H ~~ ~~
0
s::
0
.....
4J
C"'- U
UI ;:l
..::I ~ "Cl ~
;:lS::4J
tJ o 0 UI
G >.. :r: u s::
Q) 0
It1 tI.l 1-1 t/) U
~ t Q) ..
.u '0 Q.U1"Cl
(I) It1 ~ Q) III
U14JO
It1 0 ~ Q) ;:l ~
~- $.1- .-is::
Lt) ~~ ~ .""."" 0
0'\ 0'\ en ::E::E4J
I , s:: s:: Q)
(1)- 1- :;i! .......... ;:l
~ "Cl
(I) H Q)Q)......
~ 1-1
1t10 0.0 P:: III III III -
P::O Eoo ~ 4J
~ It1N ~ UI UI III
~OO P:: , ~ 4J4J"Cl
......""
~ s:: s:: 0
.-I ~M :;:J:;:JZ
Lt) ..::I
0 e::
00 Lt)
I I g
H H ....N..
~ Ll'l0'l \.00 to ex> 0::I'Ll'l
0 MO MM \.0 t"'- MN
:> t"'-ex> ..-lM t"'-tO ex> 0'1
:E ..-l..-l
~
0 ~ Nt"'- ..-lex> t"'-Ll'l
M
J:ilJ:il 0::I't"'- \.00'1 0::1'\.0
..-l :>:E N..-l No::I' MM -to -to
~~ Ll'lLl'l 0::1'0::1' MM
~
:E
~
'0 0::I't"'- M\.O 00'\
0 ~J:il
M Ll'lLl'l o ex> ..-l0 -to -to
~~ ..-l..-l N..-l NN
N CIl
..-l
00
0 UU !:QU !:Q!:Q -to -to
~
~ t"'-O ON 0'\ ex> ..-lex>
0 t"'-t"'- 0::1'\.0 O'\M to ex>
00 :> t"'-t"'- ..-IN t"'-O'I t"'-ex>
0 :E ..-l..-l
~ ~
t 0
M ~J:il 0'10'\ 0::1'0 MLl'l
J:ilU) N J:il:E ex>Ll'l 0'10 00::1'
:EO ~ ..-l ~~ Ll'l0 ..-lM MM -to -to
.w t!)O 0
J:ilH H 0::I'Ll'l . - 0::1'0::1' MM
C t1)p:: p: ~ ~H Q)H >,H s::
,..., ~H
'...1 ~tiJ rz:I ~ >H ftSH 0
U PI lCCH Ii(H :tH 'M
~~ '0 t"'-M ex> 0 "fll Ll'l..-l .~
HtiJ ~fll ~fll u t"'-
N ~ 0 t!)tiJ ~fll ftS fll m ::l
O:::E M :>tiJ ~ fll \.0\.0 ~ rtS 00 OrtS ....-t..-l -to -to 'tl~
tiJH Q ~~ ." rtS ..-l..-l NN ~.....t NN S::~
Q) ~~ t=Q :3.....t o 1Il
r-l I .-i CIl OU IQU u s::
0:: ~ .-i Q) 0
.Q ~~ H ra.- tIl U
rtS ~~ liE: U) ..
E-< 1Il'tl
~,:x: 0 UU !:Q!:Q !:Q!:Q -to -to Q) 1\I
~ ~ 0
::l ~
s::
Ll'l 'M 0
0'1 :E~
0'1 s:: Q)
..-l p:: ~ffi ~ffi ~ffi ~ffi 'M ::l
'tl
H Q)~
0 ~
1\I I1l
~
III I1l
~'tl
'M
s:: 0
::>Z
~
U N'"
(j ~
::l Q)
.c: o s::
:x: 0
J,...I J,...I J,...I J,...I N
00 00 00 ::s ~
0 Q)'tl
:I:- :I:- :I:- CIl - Q.Q)
Q)
0::1' LO Ll'l 0::1' m Q.
0'\ 0'\ 0'1 0'\ Q) III
I , I , , ' I , ......
'M :x:
:Eo..
J,...I fll :E
'00 ~O s::
0 0 0 'M l/l
N
Uo::l' c:t:\.O LO t"'- Q)
"M 0'1 M ex> ~ 1Il
!:Q , I1l Q)
0.10'1 J:il..-l 0 0 'tl
lD ::l
>.-i M N N ~......
~ 0::1' 'M U
Ll'l J,...I J,...I s:: s::
.c: I CIl 00 ::>H
J,...I c:t: ~
0::1' 00 U .-iM
~ 0.-1 LJ)t"- LJ)OO NO'I LJ)N
0 LJ)O'I NO N\,O t"-O'I .-1M
:> t"-\,O 00 .;I'N .;1'00 000
:E .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1 ,-,
P-l
0 ~ MOO 0'100 M\,O MOO \,Ot"-
M
r::lr::l LJ)OO MOO oot"- NM .-1\,0
.-1 :>:E NN LJ).-1 .-1M NLJ) MM
~~ MM MM MM LJ)LJ) NN
~
:E
~
'0 t"-.;I' MM .-10 .;1'.-1 IJ")OO
0 ~r::l
M 0'10'\ f'0 M.-I \,OM 00'\
~re .-1.-1 .-IN NN MM N.-1
N U)
M
CI)
0 a:la:l Ua:l a:la:l ~a:l UU
~
~ .-IN MO t"-\,O 0.;1' <o::t'M
0 .;1'0'1 MO OOLJ) MM 0000
U) :> t"-\,O 00 LJ).-1 \,Ot"- 000'1
:E .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1
0 ~
~
~ 0
Z M ~r::l 0.;1' \,000 M.;I' .;1'.;1' 00.-1
r::lCl) N r::l:E NO \,0.-1 NLJ) \,00'\ \,ON
:EO Q .-1 ~~ MN .;I'LJ) 0.-1 MO .-IN
.w 00 0 .&J
~H H MM C/1- MM MM LJ)\,O NN
c: U)~ ~ ~ H H .&J
0 ~~ fII ~ H CEl~ C/1 ,-,
U o H
~~ ~ .&J CEl
'0 .-IN otll OOLJ) .-1.;1' OOf' t"-O'I
H~ ::c 0 0r::l tl)tIl fIIt1l 00
N ~:E M :>~ tIl 0'\0 .......ltj t"-t"- LJ)M .&J .;1'.-1 N.-1
~H Q ~P-l fIIltj .-1N ~M .-1.-1 NN V1 MM NN
(lJ ~~ I .-I U) r-l CU
r-l ~~ Q .-I U tl)U fII
.0 -
m H
~~ ~ U) lEI
~ ~~ 0 a:la:l UU ~a:l a:la:l UU
~
LJ)
0'1
0'\
.-1 ~ a:la:l a:la:l a:la:l a:la:l a:la:l
H ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ r::l~
0
tIl .w
~ c:
~- .H
ltj H Q.)H Ul
~ Q.) > ~'t1
Q) Q) O1t1l ~tIl ;:l t:
~ ~ a:l Q)tIl to o 0
CI) .....ltj tIl ltj :I: tI
Q)
MM l-lM ~tIl
"0 "0 LJ) OU Q.)U Q) ..
l-l l-l 0 U- 01- Q.Ul
'M 'M 00 .w Q)
Ul.j..J
..c:: ..c:: I ~ ~ Q) ;:l
~- ~- H_ U) ~ .-4t:
LJ) <o::t' IJ") ..-1 -.-I
0'\ 0'\ 0'\ <o::t' .;I' :E:E
I .. I .. 1 .. 10'\ 10'\ t: t:
.w.. -.-I ..-1
to- c:- Q) Q)
tIl ~ r::l ~ ~
tOo ~O 0 III III ,-,
~.;I' =\,0 '.-I i:t:o (1)0
eo ltjO'l Q)\,O 00 lnO'\ Ul Ul
~ .. ~ .. > .. f@~ Q.)N '.j..J .j..J
<o::t' t"- ~O M -.-I -.-I
.. t: r::
~N ~N <o::t' .;I' MO pp
"0 I/'ILJ) OM
l-l 0 U
LJ) IJ") 'M 00
I I ..c:: I ~
H H ~ H U) r-iN
l i
...:I coo COO) ..-iqt
0 LO..-i COM CO..-i
:> LO\,O LO\D t't'
~
Ol
0 ~ t'N COqt
M
~~ o)LO CO\D
..-i :>~ ..-iO MN ... ...
~~ MM ..-i..-i
~
~
Ol
"0 MO'I qtCO
0 t!)~
M ~~ O..-i M\D ... ...
NN NN
N U)
..-i
U)
0 l!ll!l UtJ ... ...
...:I
...:I 0) \,0 0)0) OCO
0 qtCO 0) CO CO M
U) :> LOLO LO\,O \,Ot'
0 ~
...:I Ol
~ 0
Z M ~~ t't' t'..-i
~U) N ~~ \,Oqt CO \,0
~Q c:I ..-i ~~ N..-i . MM . ... ...
1:90 0 ~ ~
oW ~H H MM PI: ..-i..-i PI:
~ U)~ PI: ~ H -
0 ...:I~ fat ~ H U)H ),H
tJ ~Ol Pol . H Q) tIl Q)
,0 ~ \,0 CO ~tIl qt..-i .-ItIl
H~ ~ 0 t9~ tIltll ftS 113 .-ItIl 0)
N ~~ M :>~ tIl 0)0 HM Mqt ftSnj ... ...
~H c:I ~Ol Hnj ..-tN NN :>M
ill ~~ M ),tJ tJ
...-i I ..-t U) tJ ),-
~ c:I ..-t ftS-
.0 ~...:I H oIJ ftS
113 Ol...:l ::s U) 0 oIJ
~ ~~ 0 l!ll!l UU 0 ... ...
...:I
LO
0)
0)
..-t ~ l!ll!l rg~ l!ll!l
H ~3 ~3
0
'0 I::
~ 0
'M
ill ...:I .,
U
~ ~ U Ul :3
C G ~-o~
:31::.,
o 0 tll
'0 ::CUI::
l-l oW CI> 0
OM M tIl ~ Ul U
~- Q) 113 CI> .,
p.,m-o
~~ ~- ~- Q) Cll
qt qt LO m., 0
~r:z:I 0'1 0'1 0) Q):3~
~~ I , I , I , r-i I::
'M'M 0
t!) tIl- :E:E"
~ M ~
CJ)~ l!l I:: I:: Q)
~ 0 0 1130 'M'M :3
-0
Mt' " CO ~O Cl>CI>~
1130) .LJLO \D ~ ~
OM , CJ) , rg~ Cll Cll Cll
l-lLO CO .,
Ul Ul ru
oW..-t :I:..-i ..-i .,.,-0
tIl LO 'M'M
~ oW 0 I:: I:: 0
'0 tIl CO ::>::>Z
~ 113 I
H ~ H .-tN'"
~
~ O'\r-
::.E r- M
O'\N
III rI
0 ~
M NrI
rilril
rI ~~ 'd'r- -
OLfl
.. ..
::.E NrI
III
0 ciCl NM
M ~~
r-c:o
N III rIrI
rI Ul
Ul
0 UU
~
~
Ul ~ Lflrl
0 ::.E ON
~ 0'\0
III rI
~ 0
M
rilUl ~ril NC:O
::.EO Q N ril::.E
.w ~O 0 rI :>H rlO'\
t::: rilH H ~~ NrI
0 Ulo:: ~ '- ., ,.
r . ~ril (It ~ .&JH NN
'V ~
~AI Pot t/1H
Hril - H
C'\l ~ .Q ~
O::::.E 0 ~ril ~~ NM
ClJ rilH M
...-l ~~ ~~ LflLfl
~~ I rI -
.0 Q C/) .-I...-l rIrI
l'tl H rI tdU 0
~ AI~ ~ 114- rI
~~ Ul
0 UU
~
Lfl
0'\
0'\
rI
0:: Itlltl
H
Q ril~
M ~
rI ~
0
>. -..-l
~
l'tl u
~ Ul ~~ ~
'0 t
l'tl gs::~
to:: 0 ril ::cOlll
U s::
1-1- ::.E ~ Q) 0
ril~ Itl'd' t!:> CI.l u
::.Eril Q) ..
t!:>~ 0'\ ril Q.lll'tl
C/) Q) t'Il
ril ,- III ~ 0
Ul~ ~ ~g~
~ Ul ~ ...-l...-lO
~~ H :E:E~
0::
l'tlN ril ~ ~ Q)
0:: - ~ -..-l...-l :3
~~ ~ Q)Q)~
~ ~ _.
t'Il t'Il t'Il
~ llllll~
Lfl E:5 ~~'tl
I -..-l'..-l
H 0 ~ s:: 0
E-4 ::>::>Z
.-IN.
~l"'l t"-N
~ OOLJ) rll"'l t"-O'o rI~
0 O'oN 0'0LJ) 00 0'0 l"'l
:> ~t"- 0'000 rIrI rIrI
~ LJ)rI l"'lLJ) IJ')OO Nl"'l
:E \7:I:l\7:l:l LJ)t"- to m ~m O'oqt
PI :>:E Orl Nl""l qtl"'l l""lrl
~H l"'ll"'l
~ E-iE-i LJ)LJ) l""ll"'l l"'ll""l
O'o~
:E '0 qtOO qtqt O'oqt
PI t!)\7:I:l Ol"'l
~re ~LJ) mtO t"-OO NN
IJ') rIrI rIrI rIrI
CJ)
CJ)
0 UU a::lU UU a::la::l
~
~ qttO l""ll""l OOLJ) ~l"'l
0 t"-tO Orl LJ)rI oom
U) :> t"-OO rlOO rlO tOqt
0 rI rIrI rIrI
~
t ~\7:I:l l""l\D \DO 00'0 qtO
\7:I:lU) :E \7:I:l:E l""lrl \Dl""l O'ot"- ~\D
:EO PI ~~ LJ)qt l""lqt OLJ) NrI
.w t!JO .&J
\7:I:lH LJ) - qtLJ) l""ll""l 01- qtl""l l""ll""l
~ U)~ ~ E-i .H H H
0 0 Cl)H H =~
U ~\7:I:l H ;(H . H
~PI ~ :E ,0 O\D .&J t"-rI . Ul NO Nqt rI
H\7:I:l W PI t!J\7:I:l "Ul O1Ul WUl rI
N ~~ PI :>\7:I:l ... Ul t"-qt Ul 00 to .......1tS ~t"- Nl""l
\7:I:lH qt ~PI 'r4 ItS rIrI WItS rIrI rIrI NN
(l) E-iE-4 :El ~...-I ...-I ....-1
..-i ~~ PI U) E-c~ U .&Ju
.0 01_
res PI~ U) =
E-4 ~~ 0 UU UU UU a::la::l
~
LJ)
m
m
rI ~ ~~ a::la::l a::la::l a::la::l
H \7:I:l~ \7:I:l~ \7:I:l~
0
Ul
~
ItS
P'.
0) 0)
~ ~ a::l m
CJ) ~'tl
;:l I:: Q)
'0 '0 IJ') 001::
::z: t) 0
.w ).l ).l 0 Q) N
tI) -.-I -.-I to ~tIl
ES- .d I Q)..'tJ
:I:- E-i- H_ p.mQ)
Q) Q)
qt LJ) qt I.t) m ~ P.
0'0 0'0 0'0 0'0 Q) ;:l m
~ , I , I , I , .-41::
.......... ::z:
- XXPo.
.w X
tI) Ul I:: I::
0 UlO 010 0 ..... ..... U'l
N
Uqt ~~ S\D ,rI Q) Q)
.......l""l ItS 0'0 O)~ ~ ~ m
P'. ' P'. , ~ ' III III Q)
0)0'0 qt t"- ~O 'tl
m m ;:l
~rI ~N ~N qt oIJoIJ.-4
~ '0 .......... t)
).l I:: I:: I::
.d LJ) IJ') ,.-I ::>::>H
.w I I .d
qt H H E-4 MNM
.)
...:t ~\O ON ~O'\ t"-CO
~ NCO ..-i~ \ON N..-i
t"-\O ~O'\ \0\0 \0 CO
N..-i ..-i -,
~ NLfl ~M LflLfl \00
~ ~~ Lfl..-i NN U"lt"- OJN
~ :>~ O~ ..-iN ..-iN LflM
\0 ~~ \OLfl NN MM ..-i..-i
E-4
~ '0 ..-iM LflCO t"-Lfl LflN
~ ~~
N~ M..-i 00'\ O'\Lfl
Lfl <~ MM NN N..-i ..-iN
u.l
en
0 mm uu mm ou
...:t
...:t O'\..-i MO MO'\ CO..-i
0 O'\N O'\M 0'\ M t"-Lfl
u.l :> Nt"- NO'\ \0\0 Lflt"-
0 N..-i ..-i
...:t
~ ~~ MM N\O Lflt"- OCO
~u.l ~ ~~ \O..-i 0'\0 LflM ..-iOJ
~O ~ ~~ ..-i..-i ON N~ . ON
.LJ elO "
~H Lfl \0\0 NN MM ~- N..-i
C u.l~ ~ E-4 ~ H
0 ...:tr:.tl tI1 H rQH -,
U H . H Gl 00
<~ ~ ~ '0 =: O..-i .aJ t"-..-i ..-i..-i N
H~ (:1:1 N\O tI100 ~oo
N ~::E Pi ~ elr:.tl 00 as ro ..-i
:>~ ~ ..-i..-i ~N Mro 0'\ CO M..-I 0'\ \0
r:.tlH ~ <~ rQ MM NN ..-i..-i ..-iN
Q) E-4~ :E: u.l as ..-I >,U
rl ~...:t Pi (:1:1 U as-
.0 ~
ro ~...:t u.l 0
f-t ~< 0 mm mu mu ou
...:t
Lfl
0'\
0'\
..-i ~ mm mm mm ~ffl
H r:.tl3 ~3 r:.tl3
0
JJ
I::
~ '- 'tj
Q)H ~
Q)H >H
01 < Q)
Q)OO 00 ~ I:: III
..-100 0000 G !-I'tl
..-Iro I-lro ;::l t::
0..-1 Q)..-I 'tj o 0
:J:U
UU o1u I-l CIl
JJ- .... ..-I !-ItI.l
3 ::s .c: Q) CIl ..
o..lll
u.l ~ E-4- E-4- CIl
~ ~ lll+l
0'\ 0'\ CIl ;::l
I~ I~ I .. I .. .....t::
."""
0'\ JJO'\ :E:E
t/).. I:: .. ..-I
~- tiI- a:l c: c:
~ 0 0 ""."
Q) ..-It"- . ex) .-.
CIl CIl
0 010 tj 0'\ JJLfl !-I !-I
~~ Q)O'\ .... .. en .. 1\I 1\I
..-IN I-lLfl OJ III III
..-I .. JJ..-i ::Z::..... +l+l
Lfl~ 00 t/) ."""
OLfl UM ::s JJ t:: t::
OJ 'tj 00 ::>::>
I 3 I:: ro
H u.l H ~ .-iN
...:l \.ON
0 q<q<
~ rllJ)
rlrl
~ 000
::E rilril 0000
~ ~::E NO
\.0 ~~ NN
E-i
::E '0 lJ)\'o
~ ~ril
q<\.O
IJ) ~re rlrl
00
00
0 UU
...:l
...:l t"-O
0 t"-oo
00 ~ rllJ)
0 rlrl
...:l
~ ~t:J::l l""lt"-
riloo ::E ril::E 0'\ 00
::EO ~ ~~ Orl
ClO
oW rilH IJ) . - NN
~ 000:: Q E-i .&JH
0 0 tJlH
U ...:lril H H
~~ p:: ::E ,0 W \.Oq< l""l
Hril ~ m~
N O::::E Pt ~ Clril rl
~ril \'o1J)
rilH :E: q< ~~ o n1 rlrl
Q) E-iE-i r-Ir-i
r-i ~...:l Pt 00 ftSU
.0 Pt-
n1 ~...:l 00
E-i ~~ 0 UU
...:l
IJ)
0'\
0'\
rl 0:: COCO
H ril~
0
0'\
m
>. J-l'tl
n1 00 ::l e
~ ~ o 0
XU
Q)
n1 ril J-l{J)
0 ~ Q) ..
1-1- g.m
Q)
COq< J:z:l m.jJ
0'\ tI) Q) ::l
..-Ie
I - ~ -,-4.,-4
xx
ui H e s::
~O 0:: -,-4.,-4
Soo ril Q) Q)
n1N ~ J-l J-l
p:: , t1l t1l
q< m m
~l""l ...:l .jJ.jJ
-,-4-,-1
ES s:: e
Ltl 00
I g
H .-iN
,7 ';) (/
Tables 3, 4 and 5 present the results of the 1995 TMP for each time period, ~
comparing 1994 data with the 1995 information obtained for each segment
studied.
Table 3
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(AM PERIOD)
1994 VS. 1995
s'rl~EET SEGMENT
(SEG. LIMITS)
.~9_4 ADT / ' 95 ADT
DIR
H St.
(1- 5 NB - Third)
27,960 / NC
EB
WB
H St.
(Third - I-80S SB)
NC / 40,610
EB
WB
East H St. EB
(1805 NB - SWC Ent) WB
54,180 / NC
East H St. EB
(SWC Ent - Rutgers) WB
30,290 / NC
Otay Lakes Rd. NB
(E. H St.- Tel. Cyn) SB
18,580 / NC
Otay Valley Rd. EB
(I-80S NB - CVCL) WB
NC / 18,600
Palomar St. EB
(1-5 NB - Broadway) WB
34,280 / NC
Units are in Miles per Hour
NC Not Counted
,
~
1994
7-9AM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED VOL.
B
B
19.3 1162
20.2 922
7-8AM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
B
B
19.5
20.3
1995
8-9AM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
C
B
A
B
A
A
C
C
D
C
*
*
B
B
17.4
20.1
27.4
24.5
36.5
38.1
23.9
23.4
21.3
24.5
*
*
21.1
20.7
· No data (due to road construction) .
7-9
AM
VOL.
NC
NC
2586
2701
NC
NC
~
NC
NC
NC
NC
1469
888
NC
NC
Of the seven segments designated for study during the AM period, 1 segment
(on Otay Valley Rd.) could not be studied due to road construction, 5
segments continue to operate at LOS C or better, and one segment (on Otay
Lakes Rd.) operates at LOS D in the northbound direction for each hour of the
two hour AM period.
A
B
25.2 NC
24.2 NC
A
B
37.6 2941
34.5 4346
B
C
28.7 2006
21.7 2156
C
B
22.2 1165
29.9 1592
*
*
* NC
* NC
B
B
19.5 1230
23.5 1981
14
A
A
26.7
26.4
A
A
35.0
35.9
C
C
22.1
23.1
D
C
20.6
23.5
*
*
*
*
B
B
20.7
22.1
-
Table 4
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
1994 VS. 1995
:;'l'REET SEGMENT
SEG. LIMITS)
:L,A!)T / ' 95 ADT
DIR
rd Ave. NB
4th/C St.- H St.) SB
340 / NC
Fourth Ave. NB
(SR-54 EB - H St.) SB
NC / 31,960
Broadway NB
(C St. - H St.) SB
20,350 / 22,500
I-oadway NB
(L St. - S. CVCL) SB
20,870 / NC
B St. EB
(1-5 NB - Third) WB
NC / 24,040
H St. EB
(1-5 NB - Third) WB
27,960 / NC
H St. EB
(Third - I-80S SB) WB
NC / 40,610
East H St. EB
(1805 NB - SWC Ent) WB
54,180 / NC
East H St. EB
(SWC Ent - Rutgers) WB
30,290 / NC
1994
11:30 AM -
1:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED VOL.
C 18.0 1512
C 16.1 1579
B 20.5 NC
C 18.5 NC
B 22.8 1777
C 18.8 1655
C 17.0 1615
B 20.8 1813
B 19.0 NC
C 18.5 NC
C 16.8 2058
C 17.9 2007
A 25 . 3 NC
A 26 . 0 NC
A 36.6 3102
A 36.0 3633
B 25.7 1699
C 21.0 2015
--. No data (due to road construction).
k Units are in Miles per Hour
NC Not counted
15
11:30 AM-
12:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
C 16.7
C 16.3
B 20.8
B 20.0
B 21.5
B 21.1
* *
* *
B 19.1
B 20.2
C 17.8
C 17.5
A 25.1
B 23.4
B 34.8
B 31.7
C 22.7
C 21.9
1995
12:30 PM -
1:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
C 15.4
C 15.7
B 20.3
C 18.6
B 21. 0
B 20.9
* *
* *
B 19.7
B 19.4
C 17.3
B 20.3
B 23.1
B 21.0
A 36.4
B 33.1
C 20.5
C 19.8
2
HR
VOL.
NC
NC
2124
2592
1567
1816
NC
NC
1491
1383
NC
NC
3012
2424
NC
NC
NC
NC
,- . I
STREET SEGMENT
k;EG. LIMITS)
"..;L:iL.J\DT / I 9 5 AnT
DIR
~ St. EB
(Industrial - Third) WB
::,970 / NC
Otay Lakes Rd. NB
(E. H St.- Tel. Cyn) SB
18,580 / NC
Otay Valley Rd.
(I-80S NB - CVCL)
NC / 18,600
EB
WB
Palomar St. EB
(1-5 NB - Broadway) WB
34,280 / NC
Table 4 (Cant.)
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(MID-DA~t:PERIOD)
1994 \!S. 1995
1994
11:30 AM -
1:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED VOL.
11:30 AM-
12:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
C
B
17.8 1107
21.9 1196
B
B
19.6
20.8
C
B
26.6 1187
32.3 1328
23.4
24.1
C
C
*
*
NC
NC
*
*
*
*
*
*
C
C
18.2 1884
17.7 2258
C
C
15.2
15.3
* No data (due to road construction) .
1 Units are in Miles per Hour
NC Not Counted
1995
12:30 PM -
1:30 PM
AVG.'
LOS SPEED
B
B
20.3
21.9
..-.,
2
HR
VOL~
NC
NC
NC
NC
1135
1452
NC
NC
..-.
C
C
23.4
26.8
Of the 13 segments studied during the Mid-day period, 1 segment (on Otay
Valley Rd.) could not be studied due to road construction and the remaining
12 segments continue to operate at LOS C or better during this time period.
16
*
*
*
*
C
C
17.2
18.3
..-.,
, ,>
Table 5
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1994 VS. 1995
1994 1995
STREET SEGMENT 4 - 6 PM 4 - 5 PM 5 - 6 PM 4-6
(SEG. LIMITS) AVG.' AVG.' AVG.' PM
'94 ADT/'95 ADT DIR LOS SPEED VQL. LOS SPE.ED LOS SPEED VOL.
Third Ave. NB C 18.6 1472 C 17.0 C 16.4 NC
(4th/C St. - H St.) SB C 17.1 1613 C 14.6 C 15.8 NC
19,340 / NC
ESt. EB C 18.8 NC C 18.7 B 19.4 2094
(I-5 NB - Third) WB C 18.6 NC C 18.1 C 18.4 1666
NC / 24,040
H St. EB C 17.7 2234 C 16.2 C 17.9 NC
(I-5 NB - Third) WB B 19.3 2108 C 17.0 C 18.4 NC
27,960 / NC
-11 St. EB B 23.0 NC B 22.2 B 20.9 3803
(Third - I-805 SB) WB B 23.9 NC B 23.4 B 23.6 2855
NC / 40,610
East H St. EB A 35.3 5023 B 31.2 B 32.1 NC
(1805 NB - SWC Ent) WB B 33.2 3407 B 31.6 B 34.3 NC
54,180 / NC
East H St. EB A 30.3 2703 B 24.0 C 23.5 NC
(SWC Ent - Rutgers) WB C 22.3 1872 C 22.1 C 21.8 NC
30,290 / NC
L St. EB C 17.7 1357 B 19.7 B 20.7 NC
(Industrial - Third) WB B 19.8 1268 C 18.1 B 19.5 NC
15,970 / NC
Otay Lakes Rd. NB D 21.9 1205 D 19.1 D 19.5 NC
(E. H St.- Tel. Cyn) SB C 24.7 1569 C 26.1 C 25.2 NC
18,580 / NC
Palomar St. EB C 15.2 2323 C 16.6 C 14.5 NC
(1-5 NB - Broadway) WB C 14.9 3122 C 15.4 C 16.6 NC
34,280 / NC
1 Units are in Miles per Hour
NC Not Counted
17
..-J-~>
Nine segments were studied during the PM peak period for the 1995
TMP. Eight of these segments continue to operate at LOS C or
better when compared to last year's data. One segment (on Otay
Lakes Rd. between Telegraph Canyon Rd. and East H St.), operates at
LOS D for northbound traffic for each hour of the two hour PM
period based on the historical analysis of the roadway as a class
I arterial as described in the National Transportation Research
Board Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Apparently when the Traffic
Monitoring Program was initally set up by the consultant hired by
the City, the entire segment of Otay Lakes Road from Bonita Road to
Telegraph Canyon Road was classified uniformly as a class I
arterial for analysis under the HCM without regard for field
conditions. Subsequently, the segment was divided into two
individual segments consisting of Bonita Road - East H Street and
East H Street - Telegraph Canyon Road. Both segments retained the
classification of class I arterial.
The subject segment (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) has many
characteristics that are more compatible with the classification of
a Class II arterial than that of a class I. These characteristics
include significant residential frontage with driveway access and
onstreet parking, two shopping centers with direct access to the
road, access points to Southwestern college and a posted speed
limit of 40 mph. A Class I arterial, on the other hand, has
limited access, few if any driveways and no onstreet parking.
Based on these considerations, staff believes that the public's
expectation of the roadway is more comparable with that of a class
II (similar to Bonita Road) than a class I (such as East H Street) .
Analyzed as a class II, this segment is still operating at LOS C or
better, and thus is not in violation of threshold standards.
Additionally, the City has a project to alleviate the congestion at
the signalized intersection of Otay lakes Road and East H Street by
providing dual left turn lanes on the Otay Lakes approaches.
Therefore, staff does not believe that Level of Service D is the
correct description of the operation of this road segment when the
analysis is based on the actual physical characteristics of the
street. This project would provide LOS C or better service even as
a Class I arterial. In the future, this segment will be analyzed
as a Class II arterial, more in keeping with the actual field
conditions as described in the Highway Capacity Manual.
Table 2 indicates that of the 29 arterial segments designated for
study during this year's program, 3 segments could not be studied
due to road construction. Averaged hourly I the field. data
indicates that 16 segments operate at LOS C in at least one
direction for at least one hour during the day (3 segments in the
AM, 6 at Mid-day and 7 in the PM) and one segment operates at LOS
D in one direction during both the AM and PM periods. The
following is a list of those arterial segments which were found to
operate at LOS C:
18
.-.
.-.
.-.
iK
H St. (1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
E. H St. (SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H St. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
8 - 9 AM (EB)
7 - 9 AM (EB & WB)
7 - 9 AM (SB)
Mi4-c;lay
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.)
Fourth Ave. (SR-54 ED Rmps - H St.)
H St. (1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
11:30 AM - 1:30 PM (NB & SB)
12:30 - 1:30 PM (SB)
11:30 AM - 12:30 PM (EB & WB)
and 12:30 - 1:30 PM (EB)
E. H St. (SW College - Rutgers Ave) 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM (EB
Otay Lakes (E. H St. - Tel. Cyn Rd.) 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM (NB
Palomar St. (1-5 NB rmps - Broadway) 11:30 AM - 1:30 PM (EB
& WB)
& SB)
& WB)
2M
and
4 - 6
4 - 5
S - 6
4 - 6
4 - 5
5 - 6
4 - 5
4 - 6
4 - 6
PM (NB & SB)
PM (EB & WB)
PM (WB)
PM (EB & WB)
PM (WB)
PM (EB & WB)
PM (WB)
PM ( SB )
PM (EB & WB)
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.)
ESt. ( 1-5 NB rmps - 3 rd Ave.)
H St. (1-5 NB ramps - 3rd Ave.)
E. H St. (SW College - Rutgers)
and
L St. (Industrial - Third Ave.)
Otay Lakes (E. H St. - Tel. Cyn Rd.)
Palomar St. (1-5 NB rmps - Broadway)
The 1995 TMP found that the northbound direction of Otay Lakes Rd.
between East H St. and Telegraph Canyon Rd. operates at LOS D
during the following times:
~
7-8AM
8-9AM
4 - 5 PM
5 - 6 PM
Avg. Speed
MPH
20.6
21.3
19.1
19.5
Since this is currently classified as a class I arterial segment,
LOS D occurred when the average travel speed for northbound traffic
dropped below 22 MPH. Since this LOS D condition on Otay Lakes Rd.
occurred for more than two hours out of the day, this segment as
analyzed did Dot meet the City's Threshold Standards. As
previously discussed, staff believes that this segment operates
more like a class II arterial ,i~ the physical characteristics of
the segment and the public expectation of rea!tonable delay for this
19
and similar roads. As a class II arterial, this segment would be
considered to be operating at LOS C.
.-.
Additional analysis was performed on data collected for four
arterial segments which were found to operate at or below the
middle of the LOS C range of average travel speeds for data
averaged on an hourly basis. This LOS C range of speeds and the
median speed for each arteri.al classification are as follows:
Arterial LOS C LOS D
Classification Speed Range Speed Range
I 22 - 28 17 - 22
II 18 - 24 14 - 18
III 13 - 19 9 - 13
This additional analysis provided LOS information for each half
hour of the study period during which this mid-LOS C (or lower)
condition was found to exist. The results obtained, however, are
at a lower Level of Confidence (lower than 80%) than for the hourly
data because fewer runs are averaged during the shorter study
period. Even with a lower Level of Conf idence, the resul ts
obtained will still indicate where problems are occurring. It is .-.
possible that the severity of the problem will not be represented
to the same degree of accuracy by the data but the results are
still valid. The average travel speed of the smaller sample,
however, may be a little different from that of the larger one.
The results of the additional analysis performed on data collected
for the four arterial segments found to operate at or below the
middle of the LOS C range of average travel speeds are presented in
Appendix 7 at the end of this report and are summarized as follows:
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.) - Class III
This segment operates in the lower half of the LOS C range of
average travel speeds for a maximum of 1 1/2 hours during the
day in the northbound direction. Northbound speeds during
these times range from 15.3 to 16 MPH which are at and
slightly below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for a class III
arterial segment.
In the southbound direction, this segment operates in the
lower half of LOS .C for 1 1/2 hours and at LOS D for half an
hour (from 4:00 PM to 4:30 PM) during the day. Average (LOS
C) speeds range from 14.9 to 15.6 MPH which are below the 16
MPH mid-level LOS C speed for this arterial classification.
The average travel speed during the half an hour o~ LOS D is
.-.,
20
12.8 MPH. This is 0.2 MPH below the 13 MPH LOS C threshold
speed.
For both directions of travel, congestion primarily occurs at
the intersections of Third Ave./E St. and Third Ave./F St.
where Third Ave. is a downtown central business district with
a two lane roadway, angle parking and a 25 MPH speed zone.
The delay experienced at intersections along this segment
impacts the Level of Service of the segment more strongly than
the reduced speed zone that exists between E Street and G
Street. This is especially true at Third Ave. /F St. where the
street narrows from four lanes to two lanes and where high
pedestrian volumes limit right turns on red and require longer
signal cycles to get pedestrians through the intersection.
East B St. (SW Col. Ent- Rutqers Ave.) - Class II
This segment operates in the lower half of the LOS C range for
a maximum of one hour in the eastbound direction during the
day. The average travel speed is 19.3 MPH for a 1/2 hour in
the morning and 18.6 MPH for a 1/2 hour at mid-day. For this
hour, these speeds are close to the LOS D threshold speed of
18 MPH for this class II arterial.
In the westbound direction, the segment operates in the lower
half of LOS C for a maximum of 2 1/2 hours during the day.
The average travel speed is 18.8 MPH for a 1/2 hour at mid-day
which is close to the 18 MPH LOS D threshold speed. During
the other two hours the speeds range from 19.7 to 21 MPH which
are at and a little below the mid-range speed of 21 MPH for
this class arterial segment.
Congestion on this segment occurs primarily at the
intersection of East H St./Otay Lakes Rd. and to a lesser
extent at East H St. / Southwestern College entrance. There is
currently a CIP project for E. H St./Otay Lakes Rd. which will
widen Otay Lakes Rd. to provide dual left turn lanes for
northbound and southbound traffic. Once completed, this
should improve traffic conditions at this intersection for
both East H St. and Otay Lakes Road.
Otav Lakes Rd. (East H St. - ~ele~r~h Canyon Rd.) - Class I
In the northbound direction (averaging the data for 1/2 hour
increments), this segment operates in the lower half of LOS C
for 1 1/2 hours and at LOS D for 3 1/2 hours based on the
class I arterial designation. As previously discussed, staff
believes that this road is more compatible with the class II
arterial designation. As a class II, this roadway would be
consider;d operating at LOS C or better. Northbound speeds
21
"'J
~::;.. .
during the 1 1/2 hours of lower level LOS C operation range
from 22.2 to 22.9 MPH which are close to the LOS D threshold
speed of 22 MPH for this class arterial segment. During the
3 1/2 hours of LOS D operation, average travel speeds are
within 1.5 MPH of the LOS e threshold for 2 hours and operate
in the lower level of LOS D (within 1.1 MPH of LOS E) for 1
1/2 hours. For this direction of travel, this LOS D condition
is primarily due to congestion at Otay Lakes Rd./ East H St.
due to the high volume of left turning movements at the
intersection.
-.
In the southbound direction, this segment operates in the
lower half of LOS C for 2 1/2 hours and at LOS D for half an
hour (from 7:30 to 8:00 AM). Average LOS e speeds range from
23.3 to 24.5 MPH which are below the 25 MPH mid-level LOS e
speed for this arterial classification. The average speed
during the half an hour of LOS D is 21.7 MPHj this is 0.3 MPH
below the 22 MPH Class I LOS C threshold speed. In this
direction of travel, this lower LOS is primarily due to delay
at Otay Lakes Rd./Telegraph Canyon Rd. due to the high volume
of eastbound to northbound left turning vehicles heading for
Southwestern College. Additional factors contributing to
delay for southbound traffic at this location include the fact
that this is a T~e intersection where southbound traffic
accounts for only 12.4% of the total entering traffic volume
(during the time from 7:30 to 8:00 AM). Therefore, the
traffic signal is timed to serve the higher traffic volumes on
the eastbound and westbound legs of the intersection at the
expense of the lower volume southbound leg.
As stated in previous TMP reports, the apparent LOS D
condition for this segment of Otay Lakes Rd. is primarily due
to congestion at the intersection of East H St./Otay Lakes Rd.
caused by the high volume of left turning movements. The City
currently has a eIP project planned for this location which
will add dual left turn lanes for northbound and southbound
traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. at the intersection. This project
is scheduled for design this fiscal year and for construction
in the summer of 1996. Once completed, this project should
improve the LOS for Otay Lakes Rd. by increasing the capacity
of the intersection.
-.
Palomar St. (1-5 NB RmDS - Broadwav) - Class III
This segment operates in the lower half of LOS e for a maximum
of 2 1/2 hours in both the eastbound and westbound directions
during the course of the day. Average travel speeds vary from
14.5 to 15.8 MPH in the eastbound direction and from 14.2 to
16.0 MPH in the westbound direction. These speeds ar~ at or
below the mid-range speed of 16 MPH for a Class III arterial.
At their lower values (of 14.2 and 14.5 MPH respectively)
-.
22
these speeds are 1.2 and 1.5 MPH above the class III LOS D
threshold speed of 13.0 MPH.
On this segment, some congestion occurs at Industrial/Palomar
St. and Palomar St. /1-5 Northbound Ramps for westbound traffic
and at Broadway/Palomar St. for eastbound traffic. There are
currently two future eIP projects planned for Palomar St. west
of Industrial Boulevard. One project would provide
topographic mapping and traffic data to ealtrans for the
preparation of a project study report for the 1-5/Palomar St.
interchange. The second project would construct the ultimate
street improvements on Palomar St. from Industrial Blvd. to
the 1-5 northbound ramps.
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify that
LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel speed,
shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that
during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of
the day. The results of the 1995 TMP indicate the following:
1. Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.) operates at LOS D for 1/2
hour in the evening in the southbound direction.
2. East H St. (SW College Entrance - Rutgers Ave.) operates
in the lower half of LOS C (within 1.3 MPH of LOS D) for
one hour in the eastbound direction. Westbound, this
segment operates in the lower half of LOS C (within 1 MPH
of LOS D) for 1/2 hour at mid-day.
3. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.)
operates at LOS D for 3 1/2 hours in the northbound
direction during the day based on the class I arterial
designation. Lower level LOS e operations for this
direction of travel are within 1 MPH of the LOS D
threshold for 1 1/2 hours. Southbound, this segment
operates at LOS D (0.3 MPH below LOS C) for 1/2 hour in
the morning (based on the class I designation) .
4. Palomar St. (1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway) operates in the
lower half of LOS e (within 1.5 MPH of LOS D) for a 1/2
hour in the evening for both eastbound and westbound
traffic.
Since the LOS D condition for northbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd.
occurred for more than two hours out of the day, this segment does
not meet the City's Threshold Standards based on the current class
I roadway classification~ All other segments studied have
satisfied the Threshold Standards for the 1995 THP.
23
1,0, l
!
..-..
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
In addition to studying arterial segments within the City,
information was gathered for arterial interchange segments
(arterial segments crossing f.reeway interchanges). Al though these
segments are not subject to the Threshold Standards of the Growth
Management Plan, LOS measurements on these segments are a growth
management consideration in situations were proposed developments
have a significant impact at interchanges. Therefore, these
segments were included for study in the TMP program for information
purposes only.
Due to the short length of arterial interchange segments and the
close spacing of traffic signals in these areas, travel times
obtained on any given segment could vary significantly. Because of
the wide variation in the field data, it was not possible to
achieve an 80% level of confidence for some of the segments studied
without doing a prohibitive number of data runs. In those cases,
studies were limited to 40 data runs in the affected direction. Of
the segments studied, the following directional studies were
limited to 40 data runs each with a level of confidence of less
than 80%:
E St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.)
H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.)
7 - 8 AM (EB & WB)
4 - 5 PM (WB), 5 - 6 PM (WB)
~
For the 1995 TMP, the arterial interchange segments studied during
each time period were those that were found to operate at LOS C or
less during the 1994 TMP study. The results obtained for the 1995
study are presented in the following tables. Table 6 provides
information on LOS, average travel speed and travel time for each
segment studied. This information is summarized in Table 7 which
shows the number of segments of each classification which conform
to each LOS during each time period. Finally, Table 8 presents LOS
and average travel speed for each segment, comparing 1994 data with
the information obtained in 1995.
.-.,
24
I I
, ,
r--~ 0'1 0'1 OCO 0'10'1
r-l ~CO COO ~.-l OCO
0 \Dr-- \DL/) ~~ \DCO
:>
\Dr-- NN \DL/) OO~
M
:E coco r--~ \DCO .-l.-l
~ H M~ M~ ~~ L/).-l
~
~ 00 00 00 .-l.-l
0\ M
h NCO N\O r--.-l \0 CO
~ NOO \OM \D\O NO'I
Cl.l N.-l .-l.-l .-l.-l .-l.-l
CO - CI)
f:Z
~CI)
0 o:lU UU UU Oo:l
...:l
L/)N CO CO OL/) .-IN
r-l OOL/) O'IM \D~ NO'I
M tI1 0 ~CO ~~ ~\D \DO
t!J I :> .-l
~O ~ 00 NN NM \DO
tJO ~ MM
O::H f&'I ~~ 00'1 .-l\D .-lL/) .-lL/)
MO:: tI) L/)L/) ~~ ~~ M.-l
~~ CO ~~
f&'I 00 00 00 .-l.-l
H t!)
\D ...:l~ ~ '0
~ C)M NL/) \DO ON ~CO
0) ~- L/) :>M L/)
r-l H I ~Pl r--~ ~M 0'Ir-- L/)OO N
..Q 0::C/) P:: H r-- CJ) .-l.-l .-l.-l .-l.-l .-l.-l
ro MO E
~ ~...:l
0:: CJ)
~~ H 0 tJtJ UU o:lU UU
...:l
PlM ~
~~
H
M P::
L/)CJ) f&'I
0'1 ~ 0:: o:lo:l o:lo:l o:lo:l o:lo:l
0'1 = H M~ M~ M~ M~
.-l 0
r-l
0) Q) Q) o:l
~ ~ ~ -r-l m
Hro 14'0
-; s:: -; H'M =' I:
-~ H~ o 0
:I:U
Hro Hro Hro ~ Gl
Hr-l Hr-l Hr-l toto I4Ul
H'8 H'O H'O to ;j Gl ..
0 0 ro'O p,.m
Gl
toO- toO- toO- r-lS::- m.j.J
to~L/) to~~ to~Ltl UH~ Gl ='
ro 0'1 ro 0'1 ro 0'1 0'1 ..-II:
..-4..-4
r-l I .. r-l I .. r-l I .. I .. :E:E
U U - U -
- - . - . . . I: I:
'00 '00 '00 ~'OO ..-4 ..-4
>~ >\D >~ C1)>OO Gl Gl
~r-l0 ~r-l0'l ~r-l0 r-lN 14 14
o)o:l .. Q)o:l .. o)o:l .. ~o:l .. I1S I1S
Q) ~ Q) r-- 0) \D m >,~ m m
~ >,N ~ >,N ~ >,.-l .j.J.j.J
~ro ~ro ~ro o ro ..-4 ..-4
CJ)o:l C1)o:l C1)o:l r-lo:l c: C
ro 00
M ::c tj Cl.l
.-IN
;:) Lit
NLl'l
.... ..-ILl'l
0 NO) ~.
:> ..-1..-1
N..-I
r:a
:e: Moq<
5 H ..-ILl'l
E-i
~ N..-I
en r:a
h N\D
5 \DO
III NM
co ~ tI.l
~
~tI.l
0 c:J:l~
~
0)..-1
.... NO)
r:a V1 0 t--M
t!l I :> ..-IN
~Q ~ 000
uo 5 r:aril
~H r&l ~~ t--Ll'l
r:a~ V1 ..-ILl'l
~g; co E-iE-i
oW r&l N..-I
s:: H t!)
0 ~~ B '0 ~
U Ll'l 5 t!lril Moq<
~- 0 :>r:a \D
H 00 ~lll Ll'l0
\D ~tI.l ~ I t-- tI.l NM N
r:ao r&l H
QJ E-i~ ~
.... ~~ tI.l
..0 H 0 c:J:l~
cO ~
f-t lllr:a ~ Ll'l
~~
H
r:a ~
Ll'ltl.l r&l
0) E-t ~ c:J:lc:J:l
0) ~ H r:a~ tI.l
..-I 0 ~
r:a
:e:
ItS t!l
riI
oW [I)
tJl
.... r:a
:> ~ m
/ol't1
-s:: ::l e:
HQJ o 0
::z:: u
H'O U Q)
'0 D:: /olU,l
tJl.... r:a Q) ..
tJl::I:- ~ p"lD
n:l oq< Q)
lD~
....10\ H Q) ::l
U .. .-Ie:
- .- ~ ........
H ~ :E:E
0 H e: e:
0 D:: ........
.&J Ol co r:a Q) Q)
[1)0..-1 E-i /ol /ol
.&J .. ~ III I'll -.
::I:....oq< lD lD
....Ll'l
.&J .... ~ ~~
........
tJl::I: ~ e: e:
ItS ::>::>
r:a ~
.-IN
OM Ll)t"'- LI)I.O ~t"'-
r-l LI)~ NO MO t"'-M
0 t"'-I.O 00 LI)LI) ~N
:> MM M
m Ot"'- ~O t"'-t"'- Ll)t"'-
~
C ::t t"'-LI) ~~ Mt"'- 1.01.0
tI"I H ~LI) ~LI) ~~ ~M
f-i
.... ~ 00 00 00 MM
~
:>
~ ~O N~ NN t"'-~ M\D
f-i~ COLI) NM 001.0 M~
C III MM MM MM MM
tI"I ~ 00
N ~
....
~oo
0 UU 00 UU UU
..:I
MN MO MN Ll)M
r-l ~O'I MO ~~ ON
~ tIl :&: 0 t"'-I.O 00 ~~ ~O
t!J- i Pot :> MM M
~8 c ~
uO:: tI"I ~~ ~t"'- ~N I.OLI) 00
o::~ W N :>::t LI)LI) Mt"'- Nt"'- t"'-~
~lll tIl .... g~ ~LI) ~~ ~~ MN
.w t:>i W 00 00 00 MM
s:: H~ t!)
0 0 ~ ~ ,0
U .-11 t!J~ O'I~ 1.0 CO M~ 1.0 CO
~O LI) :>~ t"'-
HH U I 0 ~lll COLI) ~N CO 1.0 ~I.O
1.0 o::::t ~ H tI"I 00 MM MM MM MM N
~- E
OJ f-ioo ....
r-l 0::0 .... 00
.0 ~.-1 toot 0 UU UO UU UU
lt1 .-1
f-i lllt ~
~~ toot
LI)::t ~
W
~t!J E-4 0:: r:or:o r:or:o r:or:o r:or:o
~~ ~ H ~:.;: ~:.;: ~:.;: ~:.;:
MOO 0
r-l
OJ OJ OJ r:o
~ ~ ~ -r-l m
Hlt1 1-1"0
s:: -~ -~ H-"" ::l s::
-~ H~ o 0
::r:: u
Hlt1 Hlt1 Hlt1 .w Q)
Hr-l Hr-l Hr-l toto I-ItIl
H'O H'O H'O to~ Q) ..
0- 0- 0- lt1'O- o..m
Q)
toOLl) toO~ toOLl) r-lS::~ m~
to:';: 0'1 to:';: 0'1 to :.;: 0'1 UHO'I Q) ::l
lt1 lt1 lt1 ~s::
oM ....
r-l ,- r-l 1- r-l .- .- :E:E
U U U
- . - . - . . . s:: s::
'00 '00 '00 .woo 0 ."".""
>~ >1.0 >~ CQ>oo Q) Q)
.wr-l0 .wr-l0'l .wr-lO r-lN 1-1 1-1
OJr:o ~ OJr:o ~ OJr:o ~ ~r:o ~ lIS lIS
OJ ~ OJ t"'- OJ 1.0 lt1 ~ m m
~ >.N ~ >.N ~ >.M e >.M ~~
.wlt1 .wlt1 .wlt1 0lt1 ."".""
tIlr:o tIlr:o CI.lr:o r-lr:o s:: s::
lt1 ::>::>
~ :x: ~ III
~N
NO'I COqt qtr--
r-I r--O'I MO M\O
0 qtCO Oqt cor-- ,-,
:> .-1.-1 .-1.-1
:E:
PI NO ON
ttl
0 :E co \0 0\0
~ H .-ILtl qtLtl ... ...
E-4
.-4 ::.:t N.-I 00
ttl
:>
m ~O M.-I 0.-1
E-4~ LtlO N\O ... ...
0 Pol NM No.-l
~ ~ 00
('II f;Z
.-4
~CI) pJ~
0 pJU ... ...
..:I
Oqt NCO 0'1 \0
r-I MM NN CO 0'1
ttl tf.I :E: 0 \Or-- .-Iqt r--\O
t!)- I PI :> .-1.-1 .-1.-1
~8 0 ::.:t
uO:: rt'l ttlttl .-10 NN
o::ttl ~ ('II ~~ Or-- 00
ttlPol 00 .-4 Nqt qtLtl ... ...
.w ~;>-! ~ E-4E-4 N.-I 00
~ H~ a
0 0 ~ '0
U ..:II Ltl t!lttl 0'1\0 CO.-l ,-,
~O 0 :>ttl co
HH U co 0 ~Pol qtN .-100 ... ...
\0 o::e ~ I ~ 00 NM N.-I N
ttl, ~ H
(1) E-4oo .-l
.-f 0::0 .-l 00
.0 ~..:I H 0 pJ~ pJU ... ...
to ..:I
E-4 Pol~ ~ r--
~~ H
Ltl~ ~
fI1
0'It!l E-t 0:: pJpJ pJpJ pJpJ
O'Ittl ~ H ttl~ ttl~ ttl~ CI)
.-100 0 ~
ttl
:E
- . t!)
ItS H$-! (1) ttl t:
.w HO > CI) 0
[/] H -~ "M
'M .w H ttl +J
U
:> [/][/] $-! ~ H~ ~
[/](1) [/](1)
-~ tO$-! [/]'0 ::It:+J
HQ) r-1U ItS ~ o 0 m
::I:Ut:
H'O UQ) r-1tO U 41 0
'0 -r-1 UQ) 0:: HtIlU
[/]'M ItS -r-1 ttl 41 ..
[/]:I:- . :I:- 0- ~ Q..1Il'tl
41 tIS
ItS qt '0 qt qt m +J 0
r-110'\ 0::10'\ . 1 0'\ H Gl ;:l H
U .. '0 . .. .-It:
- .- ~ID- O::Q)- ..:I 'M"M 0
$-! > ~ XX+J
0 ~O >,~ H t: t: Gl
0 Q) 0 0:: "M"M ;:l
.w 01 co .s::: Ltl r-1Q)\O ttl 'tl
Q)Q)~
000.-1 0l~0 .-l[/]qt E-4 H H
.w .. ItS 0 .. ItS 0 .. ~ tIS tIS tIS ,-,
:I:.-lqt $-! 'M \0 :>$-!N +J
.-lLtl OlUM .-IN m m tIS
+J+J'tl
.w'M Q)1tS >,Q) ..:I 'M"M
tIJ:I: .-lZ 1tS:E E:5 t:t:o
ItS Q) .w PPZ
M E-4 0 0
E-4 .-fC'\lto
.-IC"'l \D M 0"100 I.ON
r-i O"ILn C"-O"I LnLn ~~
0 moo 00 C"-Ln .-ILn
> .-1.-1 .-1.-1
00 M 1.00"1 MC"- OO\D
f%1
:E Ln 0"1 OO~ NN C"'lLn
:E: H ~Ln C"'lLn LnLn .-1M
Pot ~
~ 00 00 00 N.-I
\0 f%1
>
g~ C"-~ 1.00 moo \DOO
:E:
Pot OO~ Ln.-l ~~ O~
Pol .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1
Ln . CI)
~
~CJ)
0 UU UQ UU QU
~
MM ooLn ~O"I C"-O
r-i 0.-1 Ln.-l 0000 C"-oo
f%1 tI) 0 .-100 .-10 C"-Ln .-ILn
t? I > .-I .-1.-1 .-1.-1
~o ~ 1.01.0 ~I.O 00 MOO
UO ~ f%1f%1
P:::H lit ~~ .-1M MI.O 001.0 ~.-I
f%1P::: tIl Ln.-l ~O LnLn .-1M
~g; Ln ~~ .
.w lit 0.-1 0.-1 00 N.-I
~ H t!)
0 :E ~ .Q
U ~Pol :E: t!)PLI 1.01.0 0"10 LnO"l Ln~
~- Ln Pot :>PLI 0"1
H U I ~Pol 1.0.-1 MO"I MM OLn
1.0 P:::CI) p:: H ~ CI) .-1.-1 .-I .-1.-1 .-1.-1 N
PLIO lit
III E-1~ ~
M P::: CJ)
.0 ~~ 1-1 0 UQ UQ UU QU
n:I ~
~ ~PLI ~
~~
1-1
PLI p::
LnCl) lit
0"1 E-I P::: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
0"1 ~ H PLI~ f%1~ PLI~ PLI~
.-I Q
r-i
Q) Q) Q) ~
~ ~ ~ _r-i to
Hn:I I-l'tl
~ ~ ~ H'M ::l I:
-~ -~ -~ Hl-l o 0
:I:U
Hn:I Hn:I Hn:! .w Cl)
Hr-i Hr-i Hr-i tIJtIJ I-ltl)
H'O H'O H'O tIJ::S Cl) ..
0- 0- o- n:! '0 - Q.to
Cl)
tlJOLn tlJO~ tlJOLn r-i~~ to.j,J
tIJ~O"I tIJ~m tIJ~O"I UHO"I Cl) ::l
n:! n:I n:! .-II:
'M-M
r-i .- M .- M .- 1- :E:E
U U U
- . - - I: I:
'00 '00 '00 .w'00 'M'M
>~ >1.0 >~ CJ)>OO Cl) Cl)
.wr-i0 .wr-i0"l .wr-i0 r-iN I-l I-l
Q)~ ~ Q)~ ~ Q)~ ~ l-l~ ~ I1l I1l
Q) ~ Q) C"- Q) 1.0 ItS ~ to to
l-l >, N l-l >, N l-l >,.-1 e >,C"'l .j,J.j,J
.wn:l .wn:l .wn:l o n:! 'M'M
CJ)~ CI)~ CJ)~ M~ I: I:
n:! 00
f%1 ::r:: ~ Pol
.-4"1
d/r-
';:{~
oq<l.O
~ Nex:>
0 t'-I.O --..
:> Nri
oq<t'-
l::a
~ riN
ft: H OLO
E-4
~ Mri
\D l::a
:>
~Q NO
ft: E-4~ O'lri
04 .-4r""l
U') ~ en
~
,.:(00
0 U,.:(
..:l
0'l.-4
~ O'lN
r1l tn 0 Nt'-
t!J I :> N.-4
~o: ~ LOO
UO :El r1lr1l
P::H JII Pol ~~ LOLO
r1lP:: tn r""loq<
~~ U') E-4E-4
oW 1I1 N.-4
I:: H t!)
0 ~ ~ .Q .-..
U ..:lP4 LO ft: (.!)r1l oq<N
,.:(- 0 :>l::a 0
H tJ ex:> .,:z:P4 Nr""l
1.0 P::OO p:: I ~ en Nr""l r""l
r1l0 1I1 H
(1) E-4..:l ~
~ P:: 00
.0 ,.:(~ H 0 U,.:(
ro ..:l
E-4 P4r1l ~ LO
~~
H
l::a p::
LOU) 1I1
O'l E-4 P:: a:la:l
O'l ~ H l::a~ en
.-4 Q ~
r1l
~
ro r1l
oW 00
UJ
..... r:r.1
:> ~ III
1-1'0
-I:: ::l s::
H(1) o 0
:I:U
- 00 H'O U Q)
ooE-4 '0 P:: 1-100
enH UJ..... 111 Q) ..
::s~~ UJtE:- ~ Q..1ll
Q)
ns oq< Ill~
U..:l11l ~IO'I H Q) ::l
- ~ tJ ~s::
E-4~ - .- ~ .~.~
~ :E:E
11l11lE-4 Q H s:: s::
11l~~ 0 P:: .~.~
~g oW 0. CO 111 Q) Q)
000.-4 E-t 1-1 1-1
en en oW - ~ III III --..
tE:....oq< 1Il III
....LO ~~
oW ..... ..:l .~.~
UJtE: ES s:: s::
ns 00
rz1 0
E-t .-!C\l
! I
".r
Table 7
1995 TMP Arterial Interchange
Segment Performance
AM PERIOD
7AM-8AM
8AM-9AM
LOS
A
A/B*
B
B/C*
C
B/D*
D-F
I
CLASS
II III TOTAL
I
CLASS
II III
TOTAL
1
1
1
1
1
3
1
3
1
2
1
1
2
1
MID-DAY PERIOD
11:30 AM - 12:30 PM 12:30 PM - 1:30 PM
CLASS CLASS
LOS I II III TOTAL I II III TOTAL
A
A/B* 1 1 1 1
B
B/C* 1 1 1 1
C 3 3 3 3
C/D* 1 1
D 1 1
E-F
LOS
A
A/C*
B
C
C/D*
D-F
PM PERIOD
4 PM - 5 PM 5 PM - 6 PH
CLASS CLASS
I II III TOTAL I II III TOTAL
1 1 1 1
.1 1 2 2
3 3 2 2
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
31
II r.1
, !
m ~
I::E:O
t'<>
N\D
MM
.-I\D
.-1.-1
UU
ZZ
~
OM
O\D
0'10
.-I
UU
ZZ
~ Q NCO N\D t'.-I \DOO
'I%l
~~g: NOO \DM \D\D NO'I
O'I<tfJ N.-I .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1
It'I tfJ
0'\ c:QU UU UU Qc:Q
0'\ 00 0
" ~
~~' Q NLO \DO ON qtCO
t!)1%l
>I%l t'qt qtM 0'It' LOCO
OO<e; .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1
CJ)
t:a tI1 t' 0 UU UU c:QU UU
Cl I ~
~Z
UO
~tfJ 111
t:aH tI1 UU t't' UU 0.-1
~~ LO ~ ZZ OOqt ZZ MOO
<_0'1 111 0 .-10'1 NO'I
HlllQO'I t!) > .-I .-1.-1
CO ::E:O...-l e --.,
~OH ~ ~~, Q
Q) <U~ NO'I Nt' MM .-It' N
M H I%ltfJ ''If ~I%l M
,Q ~tfJlll> ~ 0'\ 0'1 I%l Ot' O'IM mloD ~t'
rt1 t:aO E 0'\ <Ill N...-I .-1...-1 .-1.-1 .-1.-1
E-4 E-4~~qt " I tfJ
~~-; H t'
llll%l ~ tfJ c:QU c:QU c:QU UU
~~ 0
H ~
t:a ~
LOtfJ 111
0\ Eo4
0'1 ~
...-I
~ c:Qc:Q c:Qc:Q c:Qc:Q c:Qc:Q
H I%l~ I%l~ I%l~ I%l~
Q
l-l
:::l
0
H :x:
H l-l
Hri Q)
H H H rt1 0..
~~ ~~ H~ tIl'M I'll
H~ ril-l Q)
ns ns ns U.w r-I
tIl ri 0 tIlriU tIlriO -tIlU -,-i
tIl'O~ tIl'OZ tIl'Oqt ::sZ :E
nsoo nso nsoo ''0 J::
riO , riO........ riO , .w~........ -,-i
U~~ U~ U~\D CJ)H Q)
N 0 .-I 0 l-l
I \D I-lICO "'
........ 0\ ........ ns N I'll
.>, . >, , .>, S >, , J,.J --.
.wnsu .wnst' .wnsu onsqt .,-i
tfJc:QZ CJ)IIIN CJ)c:QZ ric:QM J::
ns p
I%l = tj III
r-i
0\ ..:I
.:EO
I"-~>
UU
zz
- Cl N\D
~t!ir:a
>re \DO
CJ'\~tI) Nrt'l
&n tI)
0\ l:Q~
0\ co 0
'"" ..:I
-. Cl
~~~ rt'l~
Lt'l0
co~~ Nrt'l
tI)
r:a t11 I"- 0 l:Q~
t.!) I ..:I
~Z
UO
p::tI) (11
r:aH t11
~p:: Lt'l ..:I 1""i\D
~_O\ (11 ~~
H~ClO\ t!1 ~ O\rt'l
co :EOI""i e N~
..:IOH Lt'l ~ -. Cl
QJ ~Up:: . 0
.-I H riltl) CO Lt'lN
.0 p::tI)~> ~ I . ~ril rt'l
ItS rilO E H 0\ 0\ ril Lt'l0 rt'l
E-c E-c..:l~~ 0\ ~~ Nrt'l
p:: CJ'\ w-I I CI)
~~-~ H Lt'l
I"-
~ril ~ tI)
~r5 0 l:Q~
H ..:I
ril ~
Lt'ltl) ~ CI)
0\ ~
0\
I""i ril
~
p:: l:Ql:Q ril
H ril~ tI)
Cl ril
~ I-l
::l
-ItS 0
H~ U ::t
HtIl p:: I-l
OM ril Q)
tIl> ~ 0-
tIl III
ItS H Q)
.-1'0 r-1
U'MU ~ -.-4
-=z ::E:
H t:
. I......... p:: -.-4
.up. ~ Q)
tl)OO I-l
~co tCl
=.-I1""i
.-I , III
.u'M ~ ~ ..
-.-4
U1=Lt'l t:
ItS ::>
ril g
.-i
U I
...:l
N~O
:I: >
......M
0'100
..s'M
............
UU
ZZ
--.,
0)00
N..s'
00\
......
UU
ZZ
~ 0 N..s' NN [--..s' 1""1\,0
:E:Ecit'il
t.llt.ll:>ff O)Lfl N...... 0)\,0 M..s'
OO~CJ) ............ ............ ............ ............
MM
an CJ)
0\ N...... 0 UU 00 UU UtJ
0\ ...... ...:l
"
I ~. 0
~:Et!)t'iI 0'I..s' \00) M..s' \00)
t.ll>t'iI OOLfl ..s'N 0)\,0 ..s'\'o
~t.ll
CI) ............ ............ ............ ............
00
MM
CI)
t'iI tIl ......N 0 tJU UO tJtJ UU
t!) i ............ ...:l
~z
tJO
CI) W
~H_ :E
t'iI tIl t.ll tJU 0)[-- UU ..s'OO
~~g~ ...:l ZZ LflO ZZ OOLfl
JJ W 0 0 00 o)N
r:: Ht.llHO\ t!J >
0 :Et:r..-I ~ M NN ......N -
U ...:lOt'il ~ ...... ~
,::e:tJt.ll ,ci~ OON 0000 ..s'M ON ..s'
HCJ)~CI) U ..,. M
00 ~O..:x:> CJi;; 0\ ~t'iI \,OM O..s' M..s' ..s'\O
til e 0\ ............ ............ ............ ............
O.J t-1...:l0..s' ~ ~
I "
rl ~~OO\
,Q ..:x: HO\ H 0
It: t'iI:E.-I M CJ)
f-I t.ll:E- ~ 0 UtJ OU tJU tJU
~fB ...... ...:l
H ......
CJi;;
LflCl) ~
0'1
0'1 ~
.-I
D:: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
H t'iI~ t'iI~ t'iI~
0
l-l
H ::l
0
H :z:
H
l-l
tI.I..-I 4l
0.
- - - tI.IllS
HS:= ::::~ HS:= 1lS.r-t III
H~ H~ .-IJ.l 4l
HIlS HIlS HIlS UoW r-i
'.-i
.-10 .-IU .-10 -tI.IU :E
tI.I'O..s' tI.I'OZ tI.I'O..s' ~Z
tI.IOO [f.l 0 tI.IOO ''0 c:
IlS 0 , IlSO' IlSO , oWS:=' ..-i
..-I3:..s' ..-13: ..-13:\0 Cl)H 4l
U N U 0 U ...... O' l-l
-, - I \0 - I J.lIOO III
, 0'1 , m >, r-: III
.>. . >. ' .>, oI.l ......
.AJIlSU oWllS[-- oWllSU OIlS..s' '.-i
ClHQ Z CJ)~N CI)~Z .-I~M c:
IlS ::>
t'iI :I: I-J t.ll
.-i
~
NP:::O
:x::>
UU
ZZ
UU
ZZ
UU
ZZ
" 0 M..... 0.....
::E:::E:ci~
Pdll :> re 1.t)0 N\O . .
OO~en NM N.....
MM
III en
0'1 N..... 0 l!l~ l!lU . .
0'1 ..... ~
M
1 ".0
~::E:t!>~ m\O co.....
~:>~ q<N .....00 . .
~~
00 CI) NM N.....
MM
en
~ tI1 .....N 0 l!l~ l!lU . .
t!> I .......... ~
~Z
uO
p:::en rz1 ::E:
~H_ tI1
~~g~ ~ ~ NM ON MM
~ rz1 0 OM \OM N\O
s:: H~Hm a 0 :> .....\0 .....00 \Oq<
0 ::E:P:::..... M MM NN ..........
U ~O~ I.t) ..... "
~U~ . 0
Hen>ten U 00 ,ciO \Om q<1.t) I.t)
00 ~O~:> ~ I 'lIl :>~ M
rz1 H 0'1 ~~~ \Om Mt"- . .
Q.) E-1~Oq< ~ 0'1 NN N.....
r-l ~~S~ M
.0 H t"-
III ~::E:"'" 0
E-1 ~ M en
~::E:- 0 l!ll!l l!lU . .
~t.!l H ..... ~
~ ~ .....
I.t)en ~ en
m ~
m ~
...... ~
E3 ~
P::: ~ l:
l!ll!l l!ll!l l!ll!l en 0
H ~~ ~~ ~~ ..-i
0 4J
~ U
~ ~ ~
H ;:l4J
-Ill H - o m
:I:l:
H~ H~ HI-! U 0
HOO 00 Q.) P::: ~ u
'M OOQ.) 00'0 ~ CIl
00:> r-ll-! OOS:: ~ r:l.."O
III
E-1 00 UU III III Ql 0
~Cil~ III . -Q.) r-lQ.) H CIl ~
r-l'O r-l Ur-l r-t
~E-1 t)'Mt) . III U -OU ~ ..-i 0
::E:HI.t) -:x:z 'O:X:Z Z ~ :E4J
t!)::E:m P::: >01 H l: CIl
~H.. . I...... 1 ...... Q.) ...... P::: ..-i ;:l
en~ ~o.. r-lQ.) ~ "0
CIl~
E-1 enoo ~S::O r-lOOO E-1 ~
E-1 .~ ~co Ol.t) III 0\0 ~ III III
~t!> :x:r-l..... 'M 0 :>I-!q< 4J
Ul III
~~ r-l .. 'U .. r-l .. 4J"O
o::enq< ~'M q< Q.)1ll1.O >OQ.)N ~ ..-i
i-t- OO:X:1.t) r-lZI""l Ill::E:N ~ l: 0
en l1S Q.) ~ oz
~ E-t 0 0
E-1 .-4...
~ ...:l
.:Eo
~~:>
~~
0\\0
O~
Nrl
utJ
ZZ
-
C"'lr--
~~
LOrl
rlrl
tJtJ
ZZ
- 0 r--~ \00 O\ro \Oro
:E~~
Ill:>[f ro~ LOrl ~~ O~
\O~C/) rlrl rlrl rlrl rlrl
II)
0\ C/)
0\ 0 UtJ tJO tJU OU
rf LO ...:l
::E-.O ~\O 0\0 LOO\ LO~
Ill~~ \Orl C"'l0\ C"'lM 010
LO~e; rlrl rl rlrl rlrl
U)
~ tf.I ~ 0 tJO UO tJU OU
CJ i ...:l
~z
tJo
~CI) rzI
~H tf.I tJtJ ~CX) tJU MN
~o:: LO ...:l ZZ MO ZZ NN
U ~_m rzI ~ Nr-l C"'lrl
.., HIllClm to!)
~""'" NN NM
C :EOr-l ~ -
U ...:lOH !I :E _
~tJo:: . ~ III .0 C"'l~ roM r-lN rlN ~
H ~U) U 0\ t!) M
CO ~U)Ill:> ~ 0\ ~:>~ r--N rlO\ LON MLO
~O rzI rf ~~ rlrl rl .-Ir-l rlrl
!ll E-i...:l:E~ ~ I III
M 0:: Illm U)
.0 ~~--~ H ~
ro
f-I Ill~ ~ U) tJO 00 tJO tJtJ
~e3 0
H ...:l
~ ~
LOU) rzI
m E-t
0\ ~
.-I
0:: jI:l1I1 111111 111111 111111
H ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~
0
~
H ::l
H 0
H :I:
~
00...-1 Q)
H - - 00 ro 0.
H= H= H= roOM In
H~ H~ H~ ...-I!-l Q)
rU HrU HrU U.w M
00...-10 ...-IU ...-10 --ooU OM
OO'O~ OO'OZ OO'O~ ::sZ :E
rUoo 000 0000 .'0 t:
...-10 , rUO........ rU 0 , .w=........ OM
U~~ r-f~ ...-I~~ U)H Q)
N U 0 tJ rl 0 ~
- I \0 - I !-l1CX) I1l
........ m ........ rU N lQ
.~ . ~ ' .~ = ~ ' ~ -
.w rU r) .wrUr-- .wrUu Oro~ OM
tf.IlI1~ Cf.IjI:lN C/)II1Z ...-I1I1C"'l t:
rU 0
D:l :I:: IJ III
M
,r":-,'
\D...:l UU
~~~ zz
" Q NO
~ciPi:1
PI:>re 0'1.-1
"",(CIJ ..-1M
It)
0\ CIJ
0\ U,(
.... L/"l 0
...:l
~". Q 'l:t'N
Plt!>Pi:1
:>Pi:1 NM
L/"l,(~ NM
CIJ
Pi:1 tn 'l:t' 0 U,(
t!> I ...:l
~Z
UO
p::CIJ (a:1
Pi:1H t11
~~-~ ...:l Mt"-
oW (a:1 0 NO
.~ t:: HPlQO'I t!) :> O'l:t'
0 ~O.-l ~ ~ L/"lM
U ...:lOH ~ -
,( Up::.
H Pi:1CIJ U . PI . Q 000'1 t"-
OO P::ClJPI:> Cll: 0\ t!)
Pi:10 (:Il 0\ ",,:>Pi:1 .-100 M
Q) E-i...:l~'l:t' ~ M ,(Pi:1 NN
r-i p:: PlO'I I PI
CIJ
.0 ,(~-~ H L/"l
rtl 'l:t'
E-i PlPi:1 ~ CIJ UCO
~~ 0
H ...:l
Pi:1 Cll:
L/"lCIJ ~ CIJ
0'1 ~
0'1
.-I Pi:1
~
t!)
p:: COCO Pi:1
H Pi:1~ CIJ
Q Pi:1
~ I-l
;:l
-rtl 0
HoW U ::t:
HUl p:: I-l
'M Pi:1 Q)
Ul:> ~ l)..
E-i Ul m
~Ci)~ rtl H Q)
r-i'O .-I
Pi:1E-i U'MU ~ ....
:E;HLI'l -=Z :E
t!>~0'I H ~
Pi:1 H, . ." p:: ....
en...:l oW~ Pi:1 Q)
E-i enoo E-i I-l
E-t . ~ oW 00 ~ III
Pi:1t!> =r-i..-l
Pi:1Pi:1 r-i , m
P::CIJ'l:t' .w'M'l:t' ~ +l
....
E-t- Ul=LO ~
CIJ rtl ::>
Pi:1 0
E-t M
From the information shown in Table 6 it can be seen that the "'"
arterial interchange segments studied along I-80S are functioning
at better overall Levels of Service than segments along 1-5 during
each of the three time periods. Along I-80S, each segment studied
is operating at LOS C or better. Along 1-5, all segments studied
are operating at LOS C or better except for the following segments
which operate at LOS D:
AM Period
Palomar St.
(Bay Blvd. - Industrial Blvd.) 8 - 9 AM
EB
Mid-day Period
H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 11:30 AM - 12':30 PM WB
H St. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) 12:30 - 1:30 PM EB & WB
PM Period
E St. (Bay - Woodlawn)
H St. (Bay - Woodlawn)
Palomar St. (Bay - Industrial)
4 - 5 PM
4 - 5 PM
4 - 5 PM
WB
WB* &
EB* &
5 - 6 PM
5 - 6 PM
WB
EB*
-.,
* Operating in the lower 1/2 of LOS D.
When evaluating Levels of Service for arterial interchange
segments, the following factors must be considered:
1. Most segments are short with controlled intersections spaced
from 130' to 750' apart. This causes traffic delayed at
freeway ramp intersections to back up along the length of the
segment.
2. Segments along 1-5 have trolley crossings close to the
northbound ramp intersections. Grade crossings for the
trolley restrict the speed of vehicles as they cross the
tracks. Also, due to the frequency of trolley operations
during daylight hours, additional delay will be experienced by
vehicles at the intersections of the arterial and the freeway
ramps.
3.
Traffic signals at freeway ramps are under the jurisdiction of
Caltrans and, therefore, are not part of Chula Vista's signal
system. Typically,. Caltrans signals favor traffic on the
ramps. This keeps traffic on the ramps from backing up onto
the freeway but increases the delay to traffic on the street
crossing the freeway.
--
38
4. The existence of a transit center or other major traffic
generator at or near a freeway interchange will serve to
increase the volume of traffic attracted to the interchange.
An example of such a facility would be the transit center
which is located on the north side of H St. at the 1-5
interchange.
As previously indicated, the City's Threshold Standards exclude
segments at freeway ramps. Since higher volume levels and lower
Levels of Service are typically anticipated at freeway ramp
intersections, LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable
for arterial interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered
a significant impact. Using these guidelines, the 1995 TMP Study
indicates that all arterial interchange segments studied are
operating at acceptable Levels of Service.
It should be noted, however, that two of the arterial interchange
segments (noted above with an asterisk) are functioning in the
lower 1/2 of LOS D during the evening peak period. One of these
segments, westbound H St. at 1-5, is functioning at 9.0 MPH (from
4 PM to 5 PM) which is the lower limit of LOS D for a class III
arterial. This, however, is not a significant change from the
previous year. In 1994, this segment operated at an average travel
speed of 9.3 MPH averaged over the 2 hour period from 4 PM to 6 PM.
This year the data was collected and averaged hourly to yield
results for the westbound direction of this segment showing an
average travel speed of 9.0 MPH from 4 PM to 5 PM and 11.0 MPH from
5 PM to 6 PM. The other segment, eastbound Palomar St. at 1-5, is
functioning at 10.5 MPH (from 4 PM to 6 PM). This speed is 2.5 MPH
below LOS C (for a class III arterial) and 1.5 MPH above the lower
limit of LOS D. This average travel speed (10.5 MPH) represents a
decrease from the 1994 level (13.1 MPH) back to the level this
segment functioned at in 1993 (10.4 MPH) .
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The purpose of the 1995 TMP Study is to assess the LOS of arterial
segments for compliance with the Threshold Standards of the Growth
Management Plan. These Threshold Standards specify that LOS C or
better, as measured by observed average travel speed, shall be
maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during
peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the
day.
The 1995 Study indicates that all arterial segments studied during
each time period operate at LOS C or better except for the
following:
39
1.
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - H St.) operates at LOS D (0.2 MPH
below LOS C) for 1/2 hour in the evening in the southbound
direction. This LOS D condition (averaged over the entire
segment) is caused by delay at the intersections of Third Ave.
with ESt., F St., and H Street.
-.,
2. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) operates at
LOS D (0.3 MPH below LOS C) for 1/2 hour in the morning in the
southbound direction. This is primarily due to the signal
timing at Otay Lakes Rd. /Telegraph Canyon Rd. which favors the
substantially higher traffic volumes. on the eastbound and
westbound approaches of the intersection.
3. Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) operates at
LOS D for 3 1/2 hours during the day in the northbound
direction (1 hour in the AM, a half hour at mid-day and two
hours in the PM) due to congestion at the intersection of East
H St. /Otay Lakes Road. Since this segment is currently
classified as a class I arterial, this LOS D condition
occurred when the average travel speed dropped below 22 MPH.
If reclassified as a class II arterial, LOS D would occur when
speeds drop below 18 MPH. The current LOS D condition was
found to occur during the following times:
Avg. Speed
Time MPH .-,
7:30 8:00 AM 18.0
8:30 9:00 AM 20.5
11:30 AM - 12:00 PM 21.1
4:00 4:30 PM 21.1
4:30 5:00 PM 17.5
5:00 5:30 PM 18.1
5:30 6:00 PM 21.2
Since the LOS D condition for northbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd.
occurred for more than two hours out of the day, this segment does
not meet the City's Threshold Standards. All other segments
studied have satisfied the Threshold Standards for the 1995 TMP.
As stated in previous TMP reports, the LOS D condition for this
segment of Otay Lakes Rd. is primarily due to congestion at the
intersection of East H St./Otay Lakes Rd. caused by the high volume
of left turning movements. The City currently has a CIP project
planned for this location which will add dual left turn lanes for
northbound and southbound traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. at East H
Street. This project is scheduled for design this fiscal year with
construction expected to begin in the summer of 1996. Once
completed, this project will improve the LOS for Otay Lakes Rd. by
increasing the capacity of this intersection.
.-,
40
In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1995 TMP also
assessed the LOS of arterial interchange segments. Although the
City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at freeway ramps, these
segments were studied to maintain current information for arterial
interchange segments which were found to operate at LOS Cor less
by the 1994 TMP. Using existing guidelines which consider LOS A
through D as acceptable for arterial interchange segments, all the
segments studied during this year's TMP were found to operate at
acceptable Levels of Service.
For the 1996 TMP, it is recommended that those arterial and
arterial interchange segments which were found to operate at LOS C
or less by the 1995 TMP be restudied. It is also recommended that
additional segments be added to the program where there has been a
significant (i.e. 2 10%) increase in traffic volumes on those
segments since they were last studied for a previous TMP report.
Conducting the 1996 TMP in this way (instead of restudying the
entire PM period) will minimize the extensive field work required
for the program while still providing the information necessary to
monitor changing traffic conditions in the field.
(M:\HOME\ENGINEER\TRAFFIC\9STMPFR1.SM)
File: 073S-10-TF-228
41
If,b
APPENDICES
1 Chula Vista Growth Management Plan
Revised Traffic Element (May 1991)
2 Arterial Level of Service
3 Arterial Segment Classifications
4 Summary of Previous TMP Study Results
5 1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
Graphics (Presented Hourly)
6 1995 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
(All Time Periods)
7 1995 TMP Arterial Segments
Operating at ~ Mid LOS C
, j
Appendix 1
Appendix 5
LIST OF FIGURES
Arterial Network & Segment Classification Map
1995 Arterial Segment LOS
7-8AM
8-9AM
11:30 AM - 12:30 PM
12:30 - 1:30 PM
4 - 5 PM
5-6AM
-
-
-
~~3 ("':. q
APPENDIX 1
CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
REVISED TRAFFIC ELEMENT - MAY 1991
GOALS
*
To provide and maintain a safe and efficient street system
within the City of Chula Vista.
*
To establish a performance measurement methodology enabling
the City to accurately determine existing Levels of Service
for motorists.
*
To define a Level of Service (LOS) value that represents a
high quality of traffic flow under constrained operating
conditions during peak periods of traffic activity.
*
To establish a performance standard which is consistent with
the Regional Growth Management Standards.
*
To maintain consistency in terms of LOS ratings with the
previous Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology.
OBJECTIVES
1. Ensure timely provision of adequate local circulation system
capacity in response to planned growth, maintaining acceptable
Levels of Service.
2. Plan new roadway segments and signalized intersections to
maintain acceptable standards at build-out of the General Plan
Circulation Element.
THRESHOLD STANDARDS
*
City-wide: Maintain LOS "C" or
average travel speed on all
except that during peak hours
than any two hours of the day.
better as measured by observed
signalized arterial segments
LOS "D" can occur for no more
* West of I-80S: Those signalized arterial segments which do not
meet the standard above, may continue to operate at their
current (Year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen.
Notes to Standards
* Arterial segment LOS measurements shall be for the
average weekday peak hours, excluding seasonal and
special circumstance variations.
1-1
(
(:)t
*
Urban and suburban arterials are defined as surface
highways having signal spacing of less than two miles
with average weekday traffic volumes greater than 10,000
vehicles per day.
* Arterial segments are stratified into the following three
classifications as shown on the attached graphic:
-,
Class I arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 35 mph and 45 mph and the number of
signalized intersections per mile are less than four.
There is no parking and there is generally no access to
abutting property.
Class II arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 30 mph and 35 mph, the number of
signalized intersections per mile range between four and
eight, there is some parking and access to abutting
properties is limited.
*
Class III arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 25 mph and 35 mph and the number of
signalized intersections per mile are closely spaced.
There is substantial parking and access to abutting
property is unrestricted.
The LOS measurements of arterial segments at freeway
ramps shall be a growth management consideration in
situations where proposed developments have a significant
impact at interchanges.
* Circulation improvements should be implemented prior to
anticipated deterioration of LOS below established
standards.
.-..
* The criteria for calculating arterial LOS and defining
arterial lengths and classifications shall follow the
procedures detailed in Chapter 11 of the 1985 Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) and shall be confirmed by the City
Traffic Engineer.
* During the conduct of future Traffic Monitoring Program
(TMP) traffic field surveys, intersections experiencing
significant delays will be identified. The information
generated by the field surveys will be used to determine
possible signal timing changes, geometric and/or traffic
operational improvements for the purpose of reducing
intersection delay.
-
1-2
,"~--..,
* Level of Service values for arterial segments shall be
based on the following table:
LOS Averaae Travel Soeed (MPH)
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
A ~35 ~30 ~25
B ~28 ~24 ~19
C ~22 ~18 ~13
D ~17 ~14 ~ 9
E ~13 ~10 ~ 7
F <13 <10 < 7
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special Report
209, Transportation Research Board, National
Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
Imolementation Measures
* Should the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC)
determine that the Threshold Standard is not being
satisfied, then the City Council shall, within 60 days of
the GMOC's report, schedule and hold a public hearing for
the purpose of adopting a moratorium on the acceptance of
new tentative map applications based on all of the
following criteria:
1. That the moratorium is limited to an area wherein a
causal relationship to the problem has been
established; and,
2. That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure to
a specifically identified impact.
1-3
-
..."
,,",$ ON II
.
..L;X. tZl~ .-1
~ -
. .,-
.. -..
. -J-
. .
I - III
- -
- --3-.
.. --- .!i
.
. ...~~
- ......
I . .. c...
- - - - - ~.
. uuuac
.
.
III - I I
-' u
- I
. I I
-
~
. I
.. I
~ I
c
,0.
~ -.",-
~"'~.
~ ..""
~ .""
... .""
6"{YO
... .""
'''yo
.......
..0
..
o ..
e. . ....
.. .
':'. : ..
'. .
~... ...
,
.".",-
\~~
.'
. .'
. ..
.... ..-
.
..
i
..-.
II.
A-
i
c
" C
-
a. I .!
" --
-- .. "
i : u
I .. -
.a."
Gl -
" Gl ·
C C ·
o - "
:I ~ U
~----
.- - -.
I i
.. :I II
o ·
u ·
o_In
..."
· .. C
- 0 I>>
> ..
~..
I>>
- N ..
:I 0 0
~.!
u .. .
Z
. .
~~
i I'
.
~.
C
...
o
.. ..
o I>> _
· 0
~~. -
.. ..
- .
U ..
..
C
. .. .. ';.
.... ~ .:....
. .. .... e.
.... ...... \ - .
. '\ .....
.. .. ..~ .... \ t
..
-.
.)
APPENDIX 2
ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE
The 1995 TMP evaluates arterial LOS as defined in the Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM). The 1985 HCM uses arterial LOS, based on
the average travel speed of through-vehicles on the segment, as the
basic measure of effectiveness used to describe the operating
performance of arterial segments. Average travel speed is
calculated from the running time on the arterial segment and the
intersection approach delay. On any given segment, factors such as
arterial classification, side friction (due to parking and
driveways), signal density (the number of signals per mile), signal
timing and progression, and traffic flow can substantially affect
arterial LOS.
The HCM classifies arterial Level of Service into six categories,
LOS A through F, with LOS A being the best quality of service and
LOS F the poorest. These arterial LOS definitions have been
incorporated into the Revised Traffic Element of the Growth
Management Plan (Appendix 1). It should be noted, however, that
the LOS definitions shown in the Traffic Element vary with the
classification of the arterial. The lesser the arterial
classification (i.e., the higher the class number) the lower the
speed associated with that LOS. Therefore, a Class III arterial
provides LOS C at a lower average travel speed than does a Class I
arterial.
In order to evaluate Level of Service for any arterial segment, the
classification of that segment must first be determined. These
arterial classifications are functional in nature and, as defined
in the Revised Traffic Element, are summarized in the following
Table:
Table 2-1
ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION FACTORS
Class I
Class II
Class III
Free Flow Traffic
Speeds
45 - 35
35 - 30
35 - 25
Number of Signals
per Mile
< 4
4 - 8
Closely
Spaced
Availability of
Parking
None
Some
Substantial
Access to Abutting
Properties
Generally
None
Limited
Unrestricted
2-1
APPENDIX 3
~
ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATIONS
During the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was
determined. Thirty-seven (37) arterial segments and eleven (11)
arterial interchange segments were designated for study. Each
segment was assigned a classification based on the free flow speed
of the segment, the number of signals per mile, the availability of
parking and the degree of access available to properties abutting
the roadway. These arterial classifications (Classes I, II and
III) are defined in Appendix 1 and are summarized in Table 2-1 of
Appendix 2. Of the 37 arterial segments defined, 2S were
designated Class III, S were Class II and 7 were Class I. Of the
11 arterial interchange segments, 8 were designated Class III, 1
was Class II and 2 were Class I. These arterial network and
segment classifications (shown in Appendix 1, Figure 1) have been
used for the current TMP study.
As can be seen from this figure, all of the Class III arterials are
located west of I-80S. This lower classification is due to the
constrained operating conditions of the street system and the
nature of existing development in this area. The only exception to
this occurs on Main Street between Third Ave. and I-80S where there
are fewer signals per mile, more limited access, less parking, and
higher free flow speeds than are typical of other arterial segments
in the central part of the City. In the areas east of I-80S, most
of the arterial segments are Class I. Class II segments exist on
Telegraph Canyon Rd. (west of Medical Center Dr.), East H St. (east
of Otay Lakes Rd.), and on Bonita Rd. (east of Willow St.) in
previously developed areas where traffic conditions are more
restricted.
~
-
3-1
APPENDIX 4
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS TMP STUDY RESULTS
The following table presents the results of previous TMP studies in
terms of arterial LOS and average travel speed for each arterial
segment and arterial interchange segment in the City. Superscript
notations within the table (on columns and on individual values)
indicate the year the data was collected. Data is provided
(averaged over two hours) for each of the following time periods:
AM (7 AM - 9 AM)
Mid-day (11:30 AM - 1:30 PM)
PM (4 PM - 6 PM) .
4-1
rl
I
'<3'
ril
tJ
H
:>
~
~
CI}
P..CI}
00
....:10
~H
:>~
~~
....:1 AI
E-t~
Z:E
~H
:EE-t
t!>....:1
~....:1
CI}~
....:1
~
H
~
~
E-t
~
~
OJ
~
..Q
n:l
f-4
.... -0
Ot!>~
O:>~
H~AI
~ CI}
~
AI
:E
AI
b
8 -0
~t!>~
~:>~
AI~AI
U)
:>-:
% 31
H
:E
b '0
ot!>~
H:>~
~~AI
~ CI}
AI
~ 31
31
cUH
H
~H
'O(f.l
H (f.l
.rf ro
.c:r-l
E-I~
~I
t
~
:E
t!>
~
U)
'lfI 'If' M M
\.OrlOL!)NL!)
CXlt'-NOO'll""l
MMNNMN
utJiJ:liJ:l~Hn
OMO'I~Nl""l
CXl\.OOO....t....t
....t....tNNNN
tJtJiJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:l
... ...
....tt'-O\.ON\.O
0'I0~NON
....tNNNNN
iJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:l
~ffi~ffi~ffi
....
+J
CI}
(f.l
OJ
~
04
ro
z
....:1
tJ
:>
tJ
.t::
+J
~
o
en
+J
CI)
p::
+J
en
tJ
.........
+J
CI}
(f.l
OJ
r-l
04
ro
Z
Q)
~
.t::
+J
~
+J
CI}
p::
. -
Cl)H
~H
<H
.Q(f.l
.6J(f.l
H ro
::Jr-l
otJ
rz.-
... ...
M....tOO'l\.OOO
O....tM....tNM
NNNNNN
iJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:l
L!)L!)~N\.OO'I
OCXll""l\.O\.ON
N....tNNNN
iJ:ltJiJ:lF(F(iJ:l
\.Ot'-ONl""lO
L!)....tOl""lt'-~
NNNNNN
F(iJ:liJ:liJ:lF(iJ:l
~ffi~ffi~ffi
+J
CI}
+J
CI}
p::
+J
(f.l CI)
Q)
r-l s::
04 'M
ro ro
Z ::E:
(f.l
~
~
iJ:l
~
~
L!)
I
~
CI}
+J
CI}
(f.l
Q)
+J r-l
CI} 04
ro
::x:: z
....tOCXl~L!)N
O~L!)\.OMO'I
~l""lNNl""ll""l
F(iJ:liJ:liJ:lF(~
OL!)~ML!)O
t'-....tCX)L!)NO'I
l""l~NNMl""l
~~iJ:liJ:l~~
O'\l""lOOl""lO
Ml""lt'-t'-L!)O
~~NNl""l~
.
'0
~
ClS
.6J
.rf
R
o
al
~~iJ:liJ:l~~
iJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:liJ:l
~~~~~~
LI1
LI1
OJ
~
....:1
U
:> r-l
~ tJ ro
o ~
r-l +J +J
r-l (f.l-S::-
'M _ ro H Q) H
~H~HtJH
+J
CI}
(f.l
I (f.l I
ro
r-l
rotJ
+J-
'M
s:: +J
o CI)
iJ:l
ro
N
ro
r-l
AI
(f.l (f.l
(f.ll(f.l
ro ro
r-l r-l
U tJ
~
o
r-l
r-l
OM
~
....:1
U
:>
tJ
+J
(f.l
ro
~
--..
'0
Cll
o
0::
>.
.I-l
I::
;::l
o
u
lJ)
N-'
I
qt
Cll Cll
.I-l.l-l
Cll Cll
QQ
("')~
0101
0101
.-1.-1
("')~
Q)
I::
o
N
'0
CI>
CI>
0.
tD
::c
p..
::;::
lJ)
N
Cll
tD.I-l
CI> Cll
'OQ
;::l
......N
UOI
1::01
H.-I
--.
.-IN
,. r
'"
. . . .
'" -0 Lt'IOOI.ONNO'\ 001.01.00'\ 1.000
OClrx:l -
O:>rx:l NO'\~riO'\O'\ OOOO~I.O Nri
H<AI NriNNriri ririNN NN
~ CI)
rx:l
AI
::E 3\ IlJ r1UQ IlJ IlJ IlJ UUIlJ< IlJIlJ
AI
.
O.
0 OOOO~I.OOOO OLt'lOO~ Ltlri
H -0
~Clrx:l - - - -
rx:l~rx:l NOOOO'\t'-O O'\OO~Lt'I riN
AI AI NriNririN ririNN NN
CI)
~
< 31
rx:l 0 IlJ tJ IlJ aHJ IlJ IlJtJllJ< IlJIlJ
tJ I
H 0
~ H
::E
rx:l
U)
M .. .... ... '" ... ..
~CI) o -0 ~riririNt'- Lt'Iri~ri ~O'\
OClrx:l - -
.w 00 H:>rx:l t'-ril.OLt'lriri ONI.Ot'- ~ri
I:: ..:10 ~<AI NNNNNN NNNN NN
0 rx:lH riI U) >,H H H
tJ :>~ AI ",H H H
riIri1 ~ 3\ :.H oH oH
..:I AI <1lJ<<1lJ1lJ .aJ 1lJ1lJ<< .aJ M
ri ~to ~to tIlto IlJIlJ I
I ~~ "'to to to ~
~ o ns rains fltns
rilH WM M M
Q) ::EE-t CQu U U
M Cl..:l
.a ~~
ns
E-t ~I
..:I ~ffi~ffi~ffi 1lJ~1lJ1lJ IlJIlJ
~ riI riI~ riI~
H
~
riI
E-t
~
I:: I1l
..:I Q) H .jJ
U Q) M 0 I1l
G ~ Cl 0
01 ~
ns 0 0\
.c:: '0 .w .w 0\
.w .w .w H -r-! M M
U) U) ;; .r-! I:: M
0 .c:: 0 .r-!
:I: ..:I U) E-t IlJ :I: ~
~
~
riI
CI) to I1l I1l
~ .jJ.jJ
Q) I1l I1l
~ :>.. 00
ns NM
~ ~ 0\0\
'0 0\ 0\
.w .w .w H ns MM
U) CI) U) Lt'I .r-! 0
I .c:: H
U :I: ..:I H E-t IlJ NM
,.....~
.w
!::
o
U
~
U
H
:>
0:::
~
CJ)
~CJ)
OQ
...:10
~H
:>0:::
~~
...:101
~~
~H
:EE-i
t!J...:I
ri1...:1
CJ)~
...:I
~
H
0:::
ri1
E-i
~
..-I
I
qt
ClJ
r-t
.Q
m
E-i
'" oQ
Qt!Jri1
O:>~
H,.:(OI
0::: CI)
ri1
01
:E
01
31
....
Q
o
H oQ
o::t!Jri1
ri1:>ri1
OI~OI
CI)
~
~
Q
I
Q
H
:E
31
'b 0 Q
0t!>ri1
H:>ri1
O:::~OI
~ CI)
01
~ 31
.aJ
tI)-
H
=~
't:I.l
r&l t:I.l
........m
"';r-l
tf.I~
=
gl
~
r:a
?5
r:a
CI)
... .. "liP ..,.
r--MOO"l
r--O"IMM
..-I..-iNN
U IXUQ I!l
.. ... ..,. .
MNNN
0"I0l/)qt
..-iNNN
tOO"IMO
\.Or--l/)I.O
..-i..-iNN
UU~,.:(
1!l1!l~1!l
I!ll!ll!ll!l
ri1~~~
ClJ
~
'0
I-l
.,-i
..c::
E-t
t:I.l
~
m
0:::
I!l
Cf)
l/)
o
to
I
H
t:I.l
~
m
0:::
ClJ
~
'0
I-l
.,-i
..c::
E-i
~
l/)
I
H
..,. ... ..,. ....
MNMM
l/)MON
MMMN
~1!l,.:(U
\.OOr--O
1.01.Ol/)..-i
MMNN
~~I!lU
.... ..,. ... ...
1.Ol/)r--r--
r--qttO..-i
MMNN
.aJ
tf.I
=
.aJ
tQ
tU
r&l
~I!lI!lU
I!ll!ll!ll!l
~~~~
.w
!::
~
ClJ
~ ~
ClJ
r-t t:I.l
r-l I-l
o ClJ
U tJl
.w-
~_;:lH
Cf)HO:::H
t:I.l t:I.l
It:I.llt:l.l
m.wm
t:I.lr-l!::r-t
~u ~ tJ
s- -
0::: Q)
tJl
~ ~
r-l
o
tJ
~
Cf)
l/)
o
to
I
H
'-
I-IH
~H
H
~
Ot:l.l
.aJt:I.l
....m
....r-t
.rt U
=-
......
r--O..-itO
NN"",..-i
NNNN
I!ll!ll!ll!l
\'ol/)mr--
..-i..-iNM
NNNN
I!ll!ll!ll!l
..-i 0\.0 \.0
MM"",N
NNNN
I!ll!ll!ll!l
qt~.
I
qt
~ffi~~
Q)
~
Q)
tJl
.w !::
Cf) m
I-l
...:I 0
III
.jJ
III
Q
<:I'
0'1
0'1
.-I
<:I'
.w
CI)
~
III III
.jJ.jJ
III III
QQ
NM
0'10'1
0'10'1
.-1.-1
......
.w
Cf)
...:I
NM
F
^~.I
.w
s::
o
U
J:I:l
U
H
:>
p::
J:I:l
U)
~U)
00
...:10
J:I:lH
:>P::
J:I:lJ:I:l
...:I~
~~
J:I:lH
:Ef-I
C9...:1
J:I:l...:l
U)~
...:I
~
H
p::
J:I:l
f-I
p::
~
r-l
I
~
Q)
rl
.0
ro
f-I
N '0
OC9J:I:l
0:>J:I:l
H~~
p:: U)
J:I:l
~
~ 31
'"
o
o
H '0
p::C9J:I:l
J:I:l:>J:I:l
~~~
U)
:>-t
~
o
I
o
H
:E
3\
M
o '0
0C9J:I:l
H:>J:I:l
p::~~
J:I:l U)
~
~ 31
.
'0
>-
r-fH
lllH
r-fH
l1S [J)
....
H [J)
~ro
0:1....-1
:;sU
'O-
R
1-1
~I
f-I
Z
J:I:l
:E
C9
J:I:l
U)
~N
MM
0101
j:Qj:Q
m \.0
O~
0101
j:Qj:Q
O~
~~
0101
j:Qj:Q
j:Qj:Q
ZU)
.w
U)
s::
'M
ro
:E
.w
U)
...:I
H
H
'H
~
t11[J)
[J)
"'10
....-I
U
00
0101
0101
j:Qj:Q
00"';
NM
0101
j:Qj:Q
N~
L.()L.()
0101
~~
j:Qj:Q
J:I:l~
Q)
~
'tl
\...I
'M
.c::
f-I
[J)
~
ro
p::
~
L.()
1
H
H
H
. H
~
t11[J)
[J)
..:Iro
....-I
U
'" '"
r--OOON
r--mL.()M
r-l,..;NN
Uj:Q~j:Q
oomr--N
r--r-lL.()\'o
r-lNNN
Uj:Q~~
NOr--L.()
NL.()L.()r--
01010101
j:Q~~~
j:Qj:Qj:Qj:Q
J:I:l~J:I:l~
....
'tl
p::
Q)
~
'tl
\...I
'M
.c::
f-I
s::
~
U
....-I
Q)
f-I
....-I
j:Q
....-I
ro
'M
\...I
.w
[J)
::l
'tl
s::
H
Q)
~
'tl
\...I
'M
..c:
f-I
0101
01\.0
0101
j:Q~
NM
ON
0101
j:Qj:Q
Mm
0101
0101
~
t11
R
....
l1S
:s
j:Qj:Q
j:Qj:Q
J:I:l~
Q)
~
'tl
\...1-
'M H
..c:H
f-IH
[J)
1 [J)
'ro
....-1....-1
j:QU
....-I
ro
'M
\...I
.w
[J)
::l
'tl
s::
H
III
.j..J
III
Cl
<l'
0\
0\
.-t
<l'
III
.j..J
III
Cl
M
0\
0\
.-t
M
L.()
I
~
III
.j..J
III
Cl
('l
0\
0\
.-t
('l
(])
~
o
N
'U
(])
(])
0..
Ul
::r:
0..
::E
LJ)
('l
Ul
(])
'U
~
rl
U
~
H
.-t
.w
~
o
U
ril
U
H
:>
P:.:
ril
CI)
~CI)
00
....:10
rilH
:>P:.:
rilril
....:I Pol
t~
rilH
:Ef-i
t!l....:l
ril....:l
CI).:x:
....:I
.:x:
H
P:.:
ril
f-i
P:.:
.:x:
ri
I
'<:t'
Q)
r-l
.Q
rO
f-i
'" 00
Ot!lril
O:>ril
H.:x:~
P:.: CI)
ril
Pol
~ 31
'"
o
8 0 0
p:.:t!lril
ril:>ril
PoI.:x:~
Ul
~
~ 31
H
:E
Q 0 0
Ot!lril
H:>ril
P:.:.:x:PoI
ril Ul
Pol
~ 31
gl
~
ril
:E
(!}
ril
CI)
co N
COri
MM
.:x:.:x:
Ori
Mri
MM
.:x:.:x:
riCO
\00
MM
.&.)
tI1
R
-n
as
l:
.:x:.:x:
mm
ril:3:
t/l
~
rO
P:.:
m
CI)
Ln
o
co _
I H
HH
t/l
I t/l
m
r-l
U
Q)
~
'0
l-l
OM
..c:
f-i
.
GJ
~
GJ
tn
R_
asH
J.lH
OH
. t/l
rI1t/l
......m
air-l
:>U
<-
GJ
tn
R
as
J.I
o
~r--~O'I
r--\OCO\O
NNNN
.:x:.:x:..:t:.:x:
~r--N\O
LnNOO'l
NNMN
.:x:m.:x:.:x:
riri~ri
CO~COCO
NNNN
.:x:m.:x:.:x:
mmmm
ril:3:ril:3:
l-l
o
~
o
.w
r-l
r-l
OM
::r::
Q)
~
Q)
to
o
l-l
r-l
Q)
:E
.w
CI)
l-l
m
6
r-l
m
Pol
l-l
o
~
o
.w
r-l
r-l
OM
::c
.
'0
~
rIlH
GJ t/l
"':t/l
as m
Hr-l
>,U
as-
.&.)
o
-.
'" '"
O~~r--~N
~Ori~MCO
MMNN~M
mlXlOU.:x:.:x:
~CO\OM~M
OO\ONLnN
MMNM~~
mmum,::C,::C
'" '"
M~NO'ILnM
MON~~\O
MMNN~~
-.
mmum.:x:.:x:
\0
I
~
lXlmlXlmmm
ZCl)ZCl)ril:3:
.w
CI)
::c
.w
tIl
m
ril
'0
P:.:
m
.w
OM
s:=
o
m
'0
P:.:
~
~
~
Q)
~
m
r-l
.w
to
ro
ril
'l'
0'1
0'1
.--l
s:=
C
rtl
.w
rtl
o
r-l
Q)
f-i
'l'
'0
P:.:
.w
CI)
::c
.w
to
m
ril
rtl rtl
.w.w
rtl rtl
00
s:=
:>.
U
NM
0'10'1
0'10'1
.-t.-t
-
r-l
Q)
f-i
NM
\'
.w
s::
o
U
~
U
H
:>
P:::
~
CI.l
~CI.l
00
~O
~H
:>P:::
~~
~04
~~
~H
::Ef-I
L'J~
~~
CI.l~
~
~
H
P:::
~
f-I
P:::
~
rl
I
~
Q)
,-j
.0
rU
f-I
N '0
OL'J~
O:>~
H~04
P::: CI.l
~
04
~ 31
...
o
8 . 0
p:::L'J~
~:>~
04~04
CI.l
:>t
% 31
H
::E
Q . 0
OL'J~
H:>~
P:::~04
~ CI.l
04
~ 31
.
'0
~
:>,H
QI
....00
r-fOO
lU rU
>,-j
U
:>,-
lU
.&J
o
gl
~
~
~
~
CI.l
ooN
MM
~~
~~
i< i<
i< i<
i< i<
i< i<
o::lo::l
~~
~
U
:>
U
.w
00
rU
~
I
00
~
rU
P:::
~
lJ")
o
00
I
H
.&JH
tf.lH
H
~
B~
....,-j
lUU
p.-
... ...
NCl'\~O
lJ")~NO
r-lr-lNN
. -
UUo::lo::l
Nr--\OO
oor--Nr-l
r-lr-lNN
UUo::lo::l
... ...
lJ")lJ")NCl'\
Cl'\MMN
r-lNNN
o::lo::lo::lo::l
o::lo::lo::lo::l
~~~~
>.
rU
~
'0
rU
o
~
o::l
~
o
PI
o
.w
,-j
r-i
OM
::x:
00
~
rU
P:::
>.
rU
~
'0
rU
o
~
o::l
~
lJ")
I
H
NNCl'\oo
Mr--~\O
f""lN~~
~o::l~~
00Cl'\Cl'\r-l
N\O\OCl'\
MN~~
~o::l~~
.
'0
~
~
o
~
lU
U
.cI
c:l.
lU
~
Ol
QI
r-f
QI
E-t
00Cl'\r-lr--
Moo\O\O
MN~~
~o::l~~
o::lo::lo::lo::l
~~~~
~ '0
o P:::
00
~ Q)
.w ~
s:: rU
U ~
>.
'O-rU
Q)H.w-
::EHOH
00 00
I 00 I 00
rU . rU
. r-i ~ r-i
I-lUOU
Q-
.w I-l
00 .w
Q) s::
I-l U
U
Q)
r-i '0
rU Q)
::x: ::E
r--
M
I
fill
tf.l
:;1
H
~
r:iI
E-t
~
~
o
E-t
c:
o
OM
.jJ
t)
;::l
l-l
.jJ
UJ
c:
o
t)
'0
qJ
o
l-l
o
.jJ
Q)
;::l
'0
qJ~
.jJ
qJ qJ
Q.jJ
qJ
'<1''0
0\
0\ 0
.-iZ
r--
I
~
'<1''''
qJ qJ
.jJ.jJ
qJ qJ
QQ
NM
0\0\
0\0\
.-i.-i
NM
, !
,w
~
o
u
rtI
U
H
:>
P=:
rtI
U)
~U)
00
...:10
rtIH
:>P=:
rtIrt1
...:IP-l
~~
rtIH
::Ef-i
CJ...:I
rtI...:1
U)~
...:I
~
H
P=:
rtI
f-i
P=:
~
.--l
I
o:i"
(1)
.-I
..0
rU
f-i
I
rz:l
l:Il
rz:l
t!J
~ ~
rz:l
~
H
~
H
~
rz:l
~
~
'" '0
OCJrtI
0:>rt1
H~P-l
P=: U)
rtI
P-l
~ 31
...
o
o '0
HCJrtI
P=::>rt1
rtI~P-l
Pl U)
~
~ 31
H
::E
M
o '0
OCJrtI
H:>rt1
P=:,.:(Pl
rtI Ul
Pl
~ 31
... ...
M~
t'-N
..-l..-l
UO
OON
~M
..-l..-l
UU
... ...
Nm
ot'-
N..-l
I1lU
gl
I1lI1l
rtI~
~
rtI
::E
CJ
rtI
Ul
Q)
~
s::
-~
HrU
H.-I
H'O
o
tIl 0
tIl~
Itl
.-I I
U
- .
'0
:>
.-I
I1l
.>,
,wltl
UlI1l
rtI
... ...
COM
..-lm
..-l
00
0000
O~
..-l..-l
OU
... ...
Nt'-
mM
ri..-l
I1lU
I1lI1l
rtI~
Q)
~
-~
HItl
H.-I
H'O
o
tIlO
tIl~
Itl
.-II
U
-
~
r-i
I1l
.>,
,wltl
U)11l
:I:
... ...
..-IN
IJ')N
..-l..-l
UO
~M
M~
rI..-l
UU
... ...
MM
ml.O
..-l..-l
I1lU
&3~
Q)
~
s::
-~
HItl
H.-I
H'O
o
tIlO
tIl~
Itl
.-II
U
-
'0
:>
r-i
al
.>,
,wrU
UlI1l
tj
NO
Mt'-
MM
11l,.:(
Mt'-
N~
MM
11l~
OO~
..-l~
MM
11l~
f;g~
,w
Q)
Q)
~
,w
U)
~
-Itl
He
o
tIlr-i
tIl Itl
ItlPl
r-i
UI
,w
.Q)
'OQ)
:> ~
r-i,w
11lU)
>,tj
rU
I1l
... ...
..-IN
MIJ')
..-l..-l
UU
ON
~~
..-l..-l
UU
... ...
..-ll'
~t'-
..-l..-l
UU
I1lI1l
rtI~
.-I
-Itl
H'M
H~
H,w
tIl
tIl ~
tIl'O
1tlS::
r-iH
U
-I
,w'O
U):>
r-i
~11l
Itl
S>,
Oltl
.-I11l
Itl
Pl
Mm
N..-l
NM
11l~
..-lM
NN
NM
11l,.:(
~M
..-l..-l
NM
11l,.:(
I1lI1l
rtI~
r-i
I1l
r-i
I1l
.-I
rU
_'M
H~
H,w
HtIl
~
tIl'O
tIl s::
ItlH
.-I
UI
Q)
tn
.Itl
.j..J.j..J
u)s::
o
s:: ~
OM ~
Itl
::E
.-."
.-.
00
I
~
f1l
~
f1l
Cl
""
0'1
0'1
rl
""
f1l f1l
~~
f1l f1l
ClCl
Nr"l
0'10'1
0'10'1
rlrl
.-.
Nr"l
'7'>
.w
~
o
U
r.:a
U
H
:>
p::
r.:a
en
~en
00
~O
r.:aH
:>P::
r.:ar.:a
~~
~~
r.:aH
:EE-i
c.!J~
r.:a~
en~
~
~
H
p::
r.:a
E-i
p::
~
..-!
I
q<
(lJ
r-i
.0
~
E-i
I
rz1
tIl
rz1
(!)
~
U
IJI::
rz1
~
H
~
H
IJI::
rz1
E-4
IJI::
II(
'" '0
0c.!Jr.:a
O:>r.:a
H~~
P:: en
r.:a
~
~ 31
'"
o
8 ,0
p::c.!Jr.:a
r.:a:>r.:a
~~~
en
:>i
~ 31
H
:E
L!)
o
00
I
H
M
o '0
0c.!Jr.:a
H:>r.:a
p::~~
r.:a en
~
~ 31
q<..-!
..-!O
NM
m~
000
...-IL!)
NN
m~
L!)I.D
ON
NN
mm
gl
mm
r.:a~
~
r.:a
:E
c.!J
r.:a
en
~
.w
_0";
H~
HO
Hm
Ul ~
Ul N
~~
r-lr-i
U~
~
(lJ
r-i
.c.!J
'0
p::~
.w
~o";
.w~
0"; 0
~m
o
m
'" '"
000'\
..-!OO
NN
um
I.DO'\
I.D 0'\
NN
mm
'" '"
L!)N
L!)O
NM
m~
mm
r.:a~
~
.w
Ul
_0";
H:>
H
~
Ul(lJ
Ul'O
~'O
r-i ''';
U:I:
I-!
o
.wOol
eno
.w
:I:r-l
r-l
.lJ 0";
Ul::I:
~
r.:a
q<L!)
000'\
N...-I
~m
q<L!)
Mr--
N..-!
mu
Oq<
NO'\
N..-!
mm
mm
r.:a~
-
HI-!
HO
H
.w
Ul Ul
Ul (lJ
~I-!
r-lU
U(lJ
- r-i
~
.:I:
'0
P::I
~
>,(lJ
U:>
.c:~
Ool~
~ 0
I-!.,.;
tnu
(lJ~
r-lZ
(lJ
E-i
Or--
1.Dq<
NN
~m
O'\q<
r--L!)
NN
~~
NO'\
ooq<
NN
~m
mm
r.:a~
H(lJ
H:>
H~
Ull-!
Ul (lJ
~'O
r-l~
U~
-(lJ
r-i
o
(lJ1
:> .
~(lJ
:>
(lJ~
tn
~ (lJ
~Ul
I-! 0
o I-!
r-l
.w(lJ
Ul:E
~
r.:a
MO'\
Oq<
q<M
~m
it it
it it
000
oor--
MM
~~
mm
r.:a~
H(lJ
:>
Ul~
Ul
~ I-!
r-l(lJ
U'O
-~
~
(lJ
r-l
o
. I
'0
p::(lJ
:>
>.~
(lJ
r-l(lJ
r-lUl
~ 0
:>I-!
r-l
>,(lJ
~:E
.lJ
o
.-t
.-t
i
rz1
tIl
rz1
I
IJI::
rz1
~
H
~
H
IJI::
rz1
E-4
~
~
o
E-t
~
o
-.-1
+J
U
::s
l-l
+J
(JJ
~
o
u
'0
C1l
o
l-l
o
+J
Q)
::s
'0
C1l~
+J
C1l C1l
Q+J
C1l
'<to '0
0'1
0'1 0
...-IZ
0'\
I
q<
'<to""
C1l C1l
+J+J
C1l C1l
QQ
NM
0'10'1
0'10'1
...-1...-1
NM
. ! I
Table 4-2 summarizes the information presented in Table 4-1 showing
the number of arterial segments, listed by classification, which
conform to each Level of Service for each time period (AM, Mid-day
and PM) studied in previous years.
.-.,
Table 4-2
ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
ALL TIME PERIODS
AM PERIOD
Class
LOS I II III TOTAL
A 3 2 5 10
A/B* 1 1 6 8
B 1 1 14 16
B/C* 1 1 2
C-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
~
Note: No data was collected on 1 Class I
segment (Otay Valley Rd.) due to
road construction.
MID-DAY PERIOD
Class
LOS I II III TOTAL
A 4 2 3 9
A/B* 1 4 5
B 1 1 10 12
B/C* 1 1 5 7
C 3 3
D-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
Note: No data was collected on 1 Class I
segment (Otay Valley Rd.) due to
road construction.
~
4-10
Table 4-2 (Cont. )
ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
ALL TIME PERIODS
PM PERIOD
Class
LOS I II III TOTAL
A 3 2 2 7
A/B* 2 1 3 6
A/C* 1 1
B 1 1 15 17
B/C* 2 2
C 3 3
C/D* 1 1
D-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
Table 4-3 summarizes the information presented in Table 4-1 for
arterial interchange segments. These tables show the number of
arterial interchange segments, listed by classification, which
conform to each Level of Service for each time period.
Table 4-3
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
ALL TIME PERIODS
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
4-11
C!
Table 4-3 (Cont.) -,
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
ALL TIME PERIODS
MID-DAY PERIOD
Class
LOS I II III TOTAL
A 1 1
A/B* 1 2 3
B 1 1
B/C* 1 1
C 3 3
C/D* 1 1
D-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
Note: No data was collected on 1 Class I
segment (Otay Valley Rd.) due to
road construction.
-
PM PERIOD
Class
LOS I II III TOT~L
A
A/B* 2 4 6
B
B/C* 1 1
C 1 1
C/D* 2 2
D 1 1
E-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different
LOS in different directions.
-
4-12
Table 4-1 indicates that 19 arterial segments operate at LOS C in
at least one direction (2 during the AM period, 10 at Mid-day and
7 in the PM). There is also one segment that operates at LOS D in
one direction during the PM period. The following is a list of
these segments: .
E. H St.
Otay Lakes
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
Broadway
Broadway
ESt.
H St.
E. H St.
L St.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
Third Ave.
ESt.
H St.
E. H St.
L St.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
Otay Lakes
AM (LOS C)
(SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.) - WB
(E. H St. - Tel. Canyon Rd.) - NB
MID-DAY (LOS C)
(Fourth Ave./C St. - H St.)
(SR-54 EB ramps - H St.)
(C Street - H Street)
(L Street - S. CVCL)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H St. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
PM (LOS C)
(Fourth Ave./C St. - H St.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H St. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
PM (LOS D)
(E. H St. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
- NB & SB
- SB
- SB
- NB
- WB
- EB & WB
- WB
- EB
- NB
- EB & WB
- NB & SB
- EB & WB
- EB
- WB
- EB
- SB
- EB & WB
- NB
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify that
LOS C or better (measured by average travel speed) shall be
maintained on all signalized arterial segments except that during
peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the
day. Since all arterial segments studied to date operate at LOS C
or better except for the segment of Otay Lakes Rd. noted above
(which operates at LOS D for the two hour PM peak period), the
Threshold Standards have been satisfied for previous TMP studies.
4-13
\ I
From Table 4-1 it can be seen that arterial interchange segments
along I-80S function at better Levels of Service than segments
along 1-5 during all three time periods. It ean also be seen that
all segments operate at LOS C or better except for the following
locations:
~
MID-DAY (LOS D)
H St.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - BB
PM (LOS D)
B St.
H St.
J St.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
WB
BB & WE
WB
Although the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at freeway
ramps, LOS measurements at interchanges are a growth management
consideration for projects which will have a significant impact at
those interchanges. Due to the higher volumes and lower LOS's that
typically occur at freeway ramp intersections, LOS A through D
operations are considered acceptable for arterial interchange
segments while LOS Band F are considered a significant impact.
Using these guidelines, all of the arterial interchange segments
studied operate at acceptable Levels of Service.
-
-
4-14
fin,
, '
:E
ell
0 -
C"1 :E
ell
N
M 0
C"1
U}
O- M
...:I>. ~
....-l
.w ~
s:: ::J - - 0 0
Q) 0 ~ ~ C"1 C"1 :E ~
5,=X= ell
III M N
Q)'O CO '" M M Ll) \0
U}Q)
~ .w
.rt .-is:: '0 '0 M
- 'E mQ) 0 0 ~ Ll) I
["'- CO
OM tI.l OM oM Ll)
~ Q) ~ ~
OJ Q) ~ Q) Q)
p.. .well '0 '0 ell ell '0 '0
~ ~- 0 0 0 0
~ OM OM >. >. OM OM
tI.l ~ ~ m m ~ ~
ellU Q) Q) '0 '0 Q) Q)
~:a ell ell I I ell ell
'0 '0
01 ~ ~ OM OM :E :E
Ll)m :E :E ell ell
"'~
"'t!J
M
rrr:JSDN
. 11. L-.-J
.
.. ....
t .-
!:
.
en : 1
- ..
o ~
- ..
o ~ 11:.
o : ...
0. .. ..
_ c :~
..;r
II
c . u
8 8 ..
i ~...3
~ I.:
'" . I :
..I I I :
I I :
I :
. I :
I I ~
.;)
~
.o~
-.S1...1"
\~'"~
., ...-If.
~ ...-If.
..1'f' .,.-If.
61'" ..-If.
~O,."-,,o(
..... ..
...........:.... ~ .......
..:~~ ". ~ \ ':.'.
. 'S. ....
...f" ~
~ ~ ~ ~.J \ t
... ".
...
-..1...1" ·
\~..~
. ..-
..'
. .
.
. .." ,,'
,.
'::.-. :'
. , .
. . . . .
... ... ~ ...
.. . So
.
.-.,
IE
.,
~
.,.
o
~
Q.
.,.
c:
.
U
-
>
~
.
(I)
...
o
-
.
.
>
.
.J
co
I
....
~
o
.,
1 AIt
-
~
.
Q.
c:
o
:I
u
.,
c:
.
E
.,.
.
(I)
~
-
...
...
U'
~
t-
V)
0)
0)
...
.,
-
~
.
.,
~
~
-
rrr:JS ON J>
.. II)
: ll. J..--J .. .. II
e ..
. . e
. "0
0 :II 0
. 0"
1/1 . D
. 0
D ~
..
C C U Q - eo
~
1/1 1/1 ~ . ...
1/1 .. .
o 0 0 ~ o.
i -'-'-' -' C . ::I
I . III"
~ .
I .
.
I.&J . .
I I .
..J .
.
I .
. .
I .
I .
.
.
. I .
I .
.
I .
.
.
'"
C
-
~
~ 0
...,
~ -
C
0
2
Co)
~ -
III ~
Z ~
- 0
J ~
~
II')
~
~
~
.o~
S1..1t.
\~t.'-:
~ ....,c.
~ ....,c.
.~ ....,c.
6~ ....,c.
_ .......0(
...fJ~'
\~(..S1"1(' 6
'.
.'
'.. 0....
\.
. .e,.
'\'. :
. .
'. . . . .
......~
... ..... ~ 4,.....
" . . Y" .
~ \ \ ....
'" \ i
~ '" ~ .
~
.... .
. . .....
.. .
.'
. .'
.' "". '" '" ...
"'... S'"
W . 0
.
o
~
'"
o
~
a.
.
Co)
-
>
~
.
CI)
~
0
.
.
. '0
> 0 i
.
.J -
~
. ~
..., a.
c I
. i
E I)
'"
.
CI)
o
...
.
...,
~
~
')
rtr:Js ON
- ,.-
c ..
. ,. c
.. !:
.: 0'0
. e
_ .0
! ....
... C 0
: l-
.. ..
. wti
. 1l1...-J
c. u c
i ~!g ~
~ I.:
....11:
-' I:
.
II:
1 :
.
. I :
I I :
.
t
eO.
_s~...~"
,~..-
....,6) ...~
.,..0 ...~
.~ ..~
,1" ..."""
...o~~:o(
. . . .' "'-...... ~ . .
.... . t/I."
... \".,.
... \. .....
\:. ..:...." ..' ~. . ~ '" "'4 "'" "'~ \ \
. ~'. : ~ s.,
". . . .: . \Ill.. e
,~"..s~...~" ·
il
t.
,
i
~
~
..-...
E
o
'"
.
o
L.
0-
.,.
C
.
U
-
>
L.
.
fI)
l
....
o
.
.
>
.
..J
"0
o
o
I')
u
.......
-
-
L.
o
.,
L.
.
0-
~
o
"0
I
"0
o
I')
-
c
o
2
u
.,
C
.
E
.,. -
.
fI)
~
-
...
...
o
L.
...
to
CIl
CIl
...
2
..
...
...
o
-
L.
.
.,
L.
<
-
nr:JS ON II
f II i...--J .. ...
c ".
. . c
. "0
0 ::t U
. 0"
I/) I( D
- . 0
D ..
..
~ II U 0 - C 0
..
. ...
I/) I/) lit lit .. .
000 0 .. o.
i ..1..1..1 ..I ~ . ::t
lit"
l'4 I . .
I .
.
w . .
I I .
... .
.
I .
. .
I .
I .
.
.
.
. I .
I .
I .
.
.
.o~
....1,..1'-
\~t.~'"
,,~ ....,c.
':;f"O ,....,c.
..~ ....,c.
.~" ,....,c.
. ....,..of
.,.O,.~,.
.. ..
C)
.~. 0 ..-
'.. : ""- .-:."
... . 111 .. .. S ...
':.... ... 0
-. . . . .
.~,..~t. ·
\~...
..
..
.
. Co)
-
0 >
~ ~
01 .
0 U)
..
a. --
01 0
C .. "0 l
- 0
.. -
0 . .. 0
.. > . I')
. a. ..
- .J
C ...
0 .. ~ I
~ c 0
"0
Co) . I 0
- E "0 I')
~ -- 01 - ..
M . ~ ('II
Z -- U)
0 ...
J ..
t- O ,
It) -
..
0) .
0) ..
... ~
-<
. ........
...." ~ ....
....... ....~..-:. \ ~ ....
. ....... .. 4L e.
.....;. \': .. \ i ..
.. WI ~ ~
~ ~
..
!l
..ii
II
rrr.JS ON
.
- ..-
e .-
1 ..I
!O
.: 0"
- ::
O ~ -..
.. eo
,,: ;...
o .. ..
-' 4C .:,g
. 1l '---1
ceo
is! 9
~ I.:
III · I :
... I I :
. I :
I I ~
I I :
I :
5
o
eO.
_~1..1t.
\ ~ ~."-
~ ..~
1JI8J ....,c.
,,1'f\ ....,c.
.1'f\ .....,c.
...o~o(
. . . . .' .. ~
.. '. . : ." ..' . ...
. ...... " . \ ':.'.
'lL ....
'.. . ..' . "&
...... ,," " \ i
: '" '" '" '" 4 .. ~ ·
" s.,
.. . .
_S1..1t. ·
\~.p
.
.
..
.
.
,.
.'
.*. ..
" . .
. .
.
.
. . . . .
.....
E
a
..
01
o
..
D-
Ol
C
.
C)
-
>
..
.
CI)
...
o
.
-
-
..
o
~
-
c
o
2
C)
.
>
.
.J
1-':1
-
..
.
0..
."
I
.
~
c
.
E
01
.
CI)
l
-
...
...
a
..
~
II)
0)
0)
...
a
-
..
.
~
..
~
.....
.. 1ft
II
rn:JS ON
.
.. "..
C 8.
8 "C
I. !:
: 0"
. D
_ 80
D .."
~ : i:
. " .8
- . 8 ~
Ul"
. 11 L.--J
C II (>
tIl .,. 0
~ S S S
o Ii:
&&I. ..
...I I I :
. I :
I I ~
. I :
I I ~
~
~
~c. .0.
,~~~~ ~
~ ....,c.
~..~
It,"{'/' ..~
.1" ...,c.
...O~~..
..' ~.,... ';..
.... .
. . .... \ ~ ....
..... . "'- .....
. '.' V' 'IE.'
.... 'a. .
';. .. "W- \ i ".
~ ~ ..
..
,~c....1..1C. ·
. ..-
0,.' .....
~ ......
.... ". s'"
.. . .
.
..
..
\.
.:.. :.
\. .
. . .
. . . . .
.
E u
0 -
... >
0- ...
0 .
... fI)
a ....
0- 0
c: .
...
o
~
. "
> l
CD 0
..J -
...
~ . 40
c: a I
.
E l It)
0-
I>
fI)
-
c:
o
2
u
-
....
....
o
...
...
."
~
0)
~
o
-
...
.
~
...
-c
CI)
0
...:l
oW
~
Q)t/.l
\D ~'O
Q)O
X Cl)o..-l
I-l
-rt r-iQ)
'0 mOl
s= o..-l
1-lQ)
Q) Q) S
Pi oW o..-l r-i
~ 1-lE-i I
~r-i ~
Olr-i
~~
U)
0\
0\
r-i
?'
N 01 "'
O~til ..-"
OC4til ~~
H C4 ~lJ'l
g5\DCJ)
C4 I CJ)I ..-l..-l ... ... .. ..
OU1NlJ'l ..-l..-lOO"l\DOO ..-lOOOqilJ'lN
~ 0 UU~~~~ . -.
C4U1H O..-l..-l..-lN..-l o '<!'lJ'l\D..-l 0"1 III
.&J
NN..-lN NNNNNN '<l'MNNMl"'l III
III
Q~OI Ltl
"' '"
"' \D '"
OC4til ~ .cacacaca cacacacacaca .:Ccacaca.:C.:C M
H til
g5lJ'l~ t'-'<l'
..-l..-l
C4 , (/)1 Ltl
~'<l'S UU
0 "' '" "' "' III
MOl '<l't'- M \D .&J
.. "til III
>t..-ltil U1lJ'l 000 0
.:C C4 ..-l..-l N..-l .qo
o I(/) '"
,0 '"
OM(/)I O"I'<l'NM '<l'N\DO"I 0lJ'l'<l'..-llJ'l0 M
H"O UU . cau
~NH OO..-l..-l M\D\DN t'-..-lOOU1NO"I
..-l NNNN NNNN M'<l'NNMM .qo
tI1
0
~ 0 "' "' "' "'
MOl t'-M 000
Rig ;.~~ .cacacaca . ca .:C .:C ca .:C.:Ccaca.:C.:C
\D\D 00
.:C..-lC4 ..-l..-l NN III
o,(/) .&J
'0 III
OM(/)\ 0
fz10 H"O UU caca M
\0 tI1H ~..-lH '"
..-l '" .D
~ ClI:: M (lj
~re ::I ~
-rot ....
'0 ~~ M ~
R ~ 01 (lj ~
Gl 8~~ Ol
0. f&'IH III
~ E-tE-t H C4 ~
~~ g50"1(/) (lj
~
C4 , CJ)I .. ..
Pt~ ..-It'-O\DN\D \Dt'-ONMO O"IMOOMO III ~
~ooS O"IO'<l'NON lJ'l..-lOMt'-'<l' ..-lMt'-t'-lJ'lO .&J::I
i5 III 0
..-lNNNNN NNNNNN '<l''<l'NNM'<l' O..c:
NN
I/) ... '"
o 01 '" (lj
0\ 8~~ cacacacacaca .:Ccacaca.:Cca .:C~caca.:C.:C M~
0\ III
r-t p:: C4 m
tiloo(/) N~
C4
I (/)1 ::I
....
~t'-S 0
U
0
)
~I .&J
cacacacacaca cacacacacaca cacaca~calXl I:
Z(/)Z(/)Z(/) Z(/)Z(/)Z(/) til3:til til3: (lj
(lj
)
..&J
.jJ II) (lj
(/)~H (\j~ 1:.J:l
.jJ H .jJ .jJ 'U > . 0
N'C
H (/) H .jJ (/) (/) 3"O(j ~"O (lj
H H (/) OP:: p:: 'C~
H 00 H 00 ~ r-i r-i II) II)
<Ll U 00 ::x:: <Ll -.-I r-i >O.jJ m>o II).&J
l:l.1:
00 .jJ r-i (j 00 r-i m -.-I .jJ 00 \.I.jJ m II)
00 CJ) 0. m 0. ~ 3:~m~.jJ~ u
m m r-i m ;:ltilH~;:l :>:
r-i ::x:: Z U Z 'C 0 H<LlO P. m
:E: II)
U (/) 00 lltI IU UU .....
E-< ~ , 00 Ltl ~
Z It m , 00 I N.&J
til III .... .jJH .ctl H I:
m (lj
~ III .jJ ~ .jJ .... ..-1 .jJr-iHH II)
~ .jJ (/) ca (/) 8 ~Ul(/)UU '011)
til (/) til 000 ~(jOO ::I....
(/) 00 ~ 00 ~ cam3 00 ....Ol -
U I:
'C U <Ll .... '<l' <Ll r-i0 lO 1:.....
... " .jJ r-i ... lJ'l .jJ r-i lOUr-i .jJr-i .....t/J
.... .c (/) 0. =' I (/) 0. N~r-i ooU
t= .jJ m 0 p:: m r-i -.-I m~
'<l' ::x:: Z lit (/) ::x:: z C4 3: til M~
?
N 01 '" '" III III III III
0::E:t>::l 0::1'0::1' 0'Io::I'0'I\D
Oo..t>::l 0'1 CO ['-COOM
H 0..
g3\D(/) riri ririNN
0.. I (/)1 ... ...
UlCO\DNNO'I \DO'I \DCO
::E: 0 o:lU UUo:lo:l
o..Ul...:l NO'Io::I'riO'lO'l o::I'\D Nri
NriNNriri NN NN
Q::E:OI III III III III
NON 0::1'
Oo..t>::l o:lo:lo:lo:lo:lo:l r..~o:l..:t: o:lo:l
H t>::l \D['-NM
IXUlo.. ririNN
t>::l (/) CO CO
0.. I (/)1 riri
::E: 0 UUo:lo:l
0..o::I'...:l UU
0 '" '"
MOl 00'1 '" '" III III III III
qo .. tIJ ['-0::1' MMriO
><rit>::l riO 0'10'1 ['-OMri
..:t: 0.. NN riri riNNN
O,(/)
,0
OM(/)\ o::I'\DOCO CO 0::1' Ulri
H"O o:lo:lC;:;~C-:C;:; o:lo:l Uo:lo:lo:l
::E:N...:l o::I'Ul riN
ri NririN NN NN
tIl
0
..:I 0 '" '" '" '" III III III III
MOl Ulri riN COUlrio::l'
h ... "t>::l . o:l o:l U o:l . o:l ..:t: o:lo:l
><Nt>::l riri 0'10 ['-['-UlM
..:t:rio.. NN riN ririNN
el,(/)
'0
el M (/)1
fz1 EI H"O o:lo:l o:lo:l UU..:t:o:l
\D ::E:ri...:l
tIl ~I ri m '"
~ el.w
~ rei ;:l '"
on .....Q r'l
'tl I '"
~ H ffll :>11) I
~ 01 III III III III '" \D
Q) ~ I o::I'rio::l'Ul el'"
8~~ 01.....
P. fz1 HI '"
~ E-t E-t i H 0.. ['-0['-0::1' I-<
~ ..:II g3O'1(/) riNNN el
:>11)
0.. , (/)1 ... qo ... qo ., .. 0::1'0'1 '"
o::I'riririN['- Ulrio::l'ri I-<
P4 ~I ~co3 o::I'ri Uo:l..:t:o:l ;:l
~ . ['-ri\DUlriri ON\D['- NN 0
NNNNNN NNNN .a
N
In ~ III Ln III III
el 01 UlM['-o::I' el '" '"
0'\ 8~~ ..:t:o:l..:t:..:t:o:lo:l o:lo:l..:t:..:t: o:lo:l I-<.w.w
0'\ O'IO\D\D '" '" '"
.-I IX 0.. riNNN mQQ
t>::lco(/) gM""
0.. ;:l"''''
, (/)1 o:lo:l..:t:..:t: ....."''''
~['-3 0..........
u
~M""
~I .w
o:lo:lo:lo:lo:lo:l o:lo:lo:l~ o:lo:l o:lo:lo:l~ s::
Z(/)Z(/)Z(/) t>::l~t>::l t>::l~ t>::l~t>::l el
el
~
H .w
.:: H {/) el el
Q) ~ H ~ .Q s::
0
Q) rl 0 Q) 'tlN
~ Cl {/) ~ IX el
...:l 0- {/) I-<'tl
H U III 0 III o:l el el
.w el
H G '0 +J +J rl '0 (/) s:: P.
H +J +J ~ ...... rl U ~ el m
(/) (/) H ...... .:: H rl ...... Ul U
{/) H .c: 0 H ...... .c: 0 :x:
mp..
{/) :I: ...:l (/) H Eo-< o:l H :I: Eo-< co G);l;:
III ~ H .....
Eo-< rl {/) , {/) tf.I , 1-<11)
.wN
Z U {/) {/) {/) {/) s:: '"
t>::l III ~ III :z: ~ elm.w
~ rl Q) rl Q) el '"
i U IX ~ U :>. IX ~ el'tlQ
t>::l III 111 .....;:l
01..... N
(/) o:l ~ "- o:l S::U'"
Z '0 '0 Z '0 ." ~ 0'\
ftS +J +J +J ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~ CIlH.....
0 (/) (/) (/) tf.I Ul ...... tf.I 0 tf.I Ul ......
H I .c: ~ , .c:
~ U :I: ...:l iii H E-< ~ o:l :z: H Eo-< . ..... N
N 01 '" 11'1 In 11'1 '" '^ ...-.,
0:Er:a ......,..,Ll)CO l'-U"l
Oo.r:a N'<I',..,...... o C'I
H 0.
~\ooo ,..,,..,NN N.-4
0. I 001 l'-O......CO '<I'N 00 ON
:E 0 o:lo:lUU CO CO . ,
0.Ll)..::l NN'<I'...... ,.., ,.., NN Ll),..,
NNNN NN NN NN
b:E 01 11'1 '" U1 U"t
N\OO.-4
Oo.r:a COo:lo:lo:l COCO o:lCO .cCCO
H r:a .......-4'<1'N C'.-4
~Ll)eJ """"NN
C'lCO
0. . 001 .-4.-4
:E 0 o:lCOo:lU
0.'<I'..::l o:lU
0 '^ '^
,.., 01 ui U"a 11'1 11'1
.... .. r:a '<I'......IflCO ,.., C'I
><.-4r:a \0,.., 0 C'I 0.-4
.cC 0. ,..,,..,N...... NN
0.00
,0
C ,.., 001 \OLl)C'lC' C'l1.O CO.-4 C'N
H"O .cCo:lUU o:lCO
:EN..::l .-4.-4N,.., 0'<1' N,.., Ll)\o
.-4 NNNN NN NN NN
tf.l
0
..:I 0 If) I,/'l U1 U1 '^ '^
,.., 01 COC'C'C'I \0 CO
I~ .... .. r:a o:lCOo:lo:l COo:l COo:l . .cC .cC
><Nr:a '<I'......N...... C'l0
.cC......c.. """"NN .-4N
0'00
'0
o ,.., 001
rz:lO H..O o:lo:lUU o:lCO
\D tf.lH :E........::l
~ ...... Ul ~
~ tJ.,
~re ;:I ~ -.,
.rt .-lQ
'tS ~
H >Ltl
~ ~fEl " 01 U1 lf1 "" '" '" \0
tJ'"
CIl 8~~ Ll)......C'I'<I' tll~
Pi rslH ~
~ E-tE-t H 0. \0 CO ,.., ,.., H
,..,,..,NN III
~..:I ~C'lOO >Ltl
0. , 001 ......0\0\0 0'<1' N'<I' NOC'Ll) ~
H
~~ ~co3 .cC.cCUU """"'<I'N '<1''<1' Ll)lfl NlflLl)C' g
NNNN NN NN NNNN
~ ..d
N
ltl '" lI'I U"l 11'1 U"t
o 01 o C'I ...... ...... III ~ ~
0\ 8~~ COCOo:lo:l o:lo:l .cC.cC o:l.cC.cC.cC H.,.,
0\ Ll)IflN,.., ~ ~ ~
r-f ~ 0. """"NN UlQQ
r:aCOOO ~M '"
0. ;:I'" '"
. 001 .-l"''''
~C'3 .cC.cCUU O~~
U
gM '"
~I .,
o:lo:lo:l& COo:lo:lo:l ~ffi ~& ~&~& J::
r:as:r:a ZOOZOO H tJ
tJ
H :J
H .,
(I) tJ III
~ ~ Ul (I) ..QJ::
C H (I) Ul (I) ~ '0 0
'"dN
00 H ~ III ~ P:: tJ
Ul H ..-t H'"d
H U '0 II) III
..-t (I) Ul (I) '0 H ~ .,11)
J::ll.
..-t 01 Ul 01 H ,.., II) Ul
0 ~~ III ~ C . H ,.., H U:z:
U~;:lH ..-t 00 III '0 ~ H H
HP::H U H =- 00 H H UlP<
Ill=::
s: ..::l 0 1"4 .-t ..-t .....
E-< OOUl , Ul III C Ul Ul Ul o:l (I) HLtl
Z Ul~Ul ,"" Ul ~ Ul E-< "N
r:a III C III W 1"4 III III III .-t J:: ~
III Ul .,
:E +l ...-tOO..-t Q 10 :E ..-t III ..-t III III ~
Cl tI) U U .... U ~ U ."" Ill'tl Q
r:a o:l~ .~ g. W H (I) .-l;:l
00 III Z ..-t +l o:l ~ ~ tll.-lN -.
~U'"
0 +l III Z Ul ..... ~ '"
+l lfl U 1"4 ~ ~ .g ~ +l +l ;:l {/J....~
III 0 1"4 00 00 00 tI) lfl tI) '0 '0
lIS CO s: .... s:: , C H
/lil H 00 III r.x. ..::l M ..::l .., H ~ H ,.., "~N
N 01 or> or>
O:Etil LflN
Oo..til O'ILfl
H 0..
g5\.OUl ......N
0.. , UlI NNCON '<1'1'0'10'1 00'1 '<I'N CON
:E 0 .;~OU"';~
o..Lfl...:l N\.OCO...... 1'\.0 CO \.0 MM
NNMM NNNN MM '<I'M '<1''<1'
b:E 01 or> or>
............
Oo..til CO 1<1;1<1; 1<1; 1<1;1<1;1<1;1<1; COCO~~I<I;I<I; 1<1;1<1;
H til
g5LflBi ......N
0.. , UlI
:E 0 OU
0..'<I'...:l
0 or> or>
MOl '<I'CO
... .. til
>t......til M\.O
1<1; 0.. NN
O'Ul
,0
OM UlI NMO...... '<I'I'N\.O 0'1 CO ""M
H ..0 'UU
:EN...:l ONM...... LflN 0 0'1 00 LflN
...... NNMM NNMN MM '<1''<1'
tI1
0
t-=i 0 or> or>
MOl ""......
~.tI1 >.~~ CO CO 1<1; 1<1; 1<1; CO 1<1; 1<1; COCO ,1<1; 1<1;
M'<I'
1<1;......0.. NN
O,Ul
'0
t!)Q OM UlI
WO H..O UU
\D tI1H :E.........:l
~ ...... mill
~ ~re 4JJJ
;j III
'M ......0 l!l
'tJ III
R ~1El >'" I
~ 01 or> or> '" '-D
Gl 8~~ MLfl 41'"
PI WH m....
III
~ tE-i H 0.. ......'<1' I<
&5O'1Ul NN 41
lI(t-=i >'"
0.. I UlI M 0'1""" CO ............'<1'...... MO'I LflM III
~~ ~co3 NN\.OO CO'<l'COCO ~~OU:~ I<
;j
~ NNMM NNNN 0
..c:
'"
11'I ~ or> or>
Q 01 \.OLfl 41 III III
0'\ 8~~ CO CO 1<1; 1<1; l<I;o:ll<l;l<I; o:lCO .1<1; 1<1; I<JJJJ
0'\ OM III III III
rf 0:; 0.. NN mOO
tilcoUl H gM<l'
0.. H
I UlI H ;j"''''
...."''''
~1'3 OU 0........
Ul U
Ul ~M<l'
tU
r-i JJ
~I u
COo:lo:l~ o:l~o:lCO COo:lo:lo:lo:l~ ~~ I::
tLI~tL1 til til~ ZUlZUltil Q)
Q)
~
Gl JJ
~ (I) ~ H Q) 41
(I) Ul I-l ~ H AI::
0
~ 0. 0 .j,.J ..I( Ul 'l:!N
e Gl Ul Ul 'd 0.. Ul ...:l 41
tU ~ 0. (I) Ul p:; tU U I<'l:!
'd 0:; 0 Ul tU :I:: (I) r-i G Q) Q)
JJ Q)
I-l ftI .j,.J 0 r-i ~ ..I( U I:: P.
M~o:l W r-i I-l U .j,.J tU Q) m
HUl~ 0 r-i r-i Ul r-i U
, H H ..... (I) tU .j,.J til ::z::
.HLflH :I:: :E . tLI r-i Ul '0 m'"
Q):E:
r-i 0 Il/l '0 Q) tU PI I .....
E-< COUlCOUl "- PI E-< tLI Ul 1<'"
Z UlHUl I >. ~ JJ'"
I:: III
til r-itU tU Gl .j,.J I-l III 'd Gl Q)mJJ
?5 tUr-ilr-i ~ Ul Q Gl 'd 0:; r-I p:; Q) III
.....U 'U ."l p:; r-I Q)'l:!0
til ~ 1-l~(I)~ I-l 0. ftI .j,.J c:: ~ CO .... ;j
m....'"
Ul tf.l .j,.J ~ Gl tU 0 M tU Ul G Z I::U'"
Ul ~ e .j,.J .j,.J ..... I:: '"
~ ;:1 0 r-i ~ ..... :I:: ~ Lfl CIl.........
.... 'd 'd ftI r-i r-i c:: r-i 0
~ c:: I-l W tU ..... ~ 0 (I) ~ CO
H M 0 0.. :I:: 0 o:l til E-< 0 H << .... '"
N 01 '" "'
O::Etxl U1\.D ---.
Oo.txl
H 0. ~\.D
g3\.Du) ..-t..-t
0. I U)I ~O NNO'ICXl
::E g UU
0.U1 NO ....r-~\.D
NN ....N~~
o ::E 01 '" '"
\.D~
Oo.txl ~~IlHO ..x:lXl..x:..x:
H txl
~U1~ ..-t ..-t
0. I U)I
::E 0 UU
o.~H
0 '" '"
....01 N....
.. "txl
>t..-ttxl r-CXl
..x: 0. ..-t..-t
O'U) s::
,a 0
0.... U)I \.DO CXlO'lO'l..-t -rl
H"O UU .0
::ENH N..-t N\.D\.DO'I U
..-t NN ....N~~ e
.0
tIl III
0 l::
0
..:I 0 "' "' u
....01 N.... 'tI
i~ .. "txl o lXl lXl ..x:lXl..x:..x: III
>tNtxl LflU1 0
..x:..-to. ..-t ..-t ~
O'U) 0
'a
0.... U)I .0
r:40 H"O UU Gl
\0 tIlH ::E..-t...:l .g
~ ..-t IIllll~
>C ~re Gl.o
:s III III
..... riQ.o I~
'0 III III
Q ~~ >1Il'tl
8~~1 "' '" '" \.V
Q) ..-tr- Gl '" 0
Pc r:4H tn..-i Z
III
~ E-tE-t H 0. ..-to ~
~..:I g30'1u) NN Gl
> III I
0. I U)\ NO'I CXlO'l..-tr- III
p.~ ~CXl3 lXllXl:::l~ ....CXl\.D\.D ~
~ ....N~~ 6
.t:
N
LIl " QI '" "'
r-..-t Gl III III
0\ 8~~ o lXl lXl ..x:lXl..x:..x: ~.o.o
0\ ON III III III
.-t 0: 0. NN IIlQ Q
txl CXl.U) gM'<l'
0.
, U)I :s"''''
ri"''''
~r-3 lXllXl o..-i..-i
u
~M'<l'
gl .0
lXllXllXl~ lXllXllXl~ r-- s::
txl~txl txl~txl t"l Gl
Gl
)
.0
H 't:l Gl Gl
0 0: to AS::
H >.. i 0
'tiN
H n:l H fIl Gl
H ~ 0 . H OJ ~'tI
't:l " ~ ~ Gl Gl
fIl n:l 0. llI: c:: n:l .0 Gl
l:: j:l,
fIl 0 0 U H l1li Gl III
n:l H ~ g to u
M lXl M 't:l H >.~ :c
U M to OJHn:lH ~ 1IlP<
Cl:E
...-i :E ~ -rl
E-< ::I: III fIlO fIl ~1Il
Z fIl tJ I fIl fIl llI: .oN
txl ., 0. n:l. n:l ~ l:: If
?5 to E .c: ~M OM Cl III .0
Gl If
0: >.. ~ fIlUHU Cl'tlQ
txl H n:l OJ~~~ ri :s
U) e lXl ~ H H c:: tnri '"
Z 't:l tJl tJ U a l:: U '" -
-rl l:: '"
n:l Gl OJ t/l......-i
r-l Lfl 0 r-l M 't:l
III , H Gl n:l OJ 0
PI H lXl ... :I: :E ... <<..-iN
N 01 '" '" '" '" <II <II <II <II
O::Eril r--q< \00 0'\ 00 \0 00
OQ,ril Lflr-l Oq<
H Q, ooq< q<q<
ei\OUl r-Ir-I r-I r-I r-Ir-I r-I r-I
Q, , UlI NO r"l0'\
~Lfl3 UU UO UU OU
r"lr-- Nr-I
r"l r"l Nr"l
o ::E 01 '" '" <II '" <II <II '" <II
\0\0 0'\0 Lf)0'\ Lflq<
OQ,ril Ill.:x: Ill.:x:
H ril \Or-I r"l0'\ r"l r"l 0Lf)
eiLfl~ r-Ir-I r-I r-I r-I r-Ir-I
Q, , UlI
~q<3 UO UO UU OU
0 <II <II <II <II '" <II <II <II
r"l01 Nq< NN r--q< r"l\O
;.;.;~ OOLfl Nr-I 00\0 r"l q<
.:x: Q, r-Ir-I r-Ir-I r-Ir-I r-I r-I
O'Ul
,0
o r"l UlI r"lr-- r-I r"l
H"O UU 00 UU UU
::EN....:l N\O NN
r-I r"l r"l Nr"l
tfl
I 0 '" '" <II <II <II <II '" '"
r"l01 O'\q< \000 r"lq< \000
;.~~ Ill.:x: Ill.:x:
tfl OOLfl q<N 00\0 q<\O
O. .:x:r-IQ, r-Ir-I r-I r-I r-Ir-I r-Ir-I
rs:I O,Ul
i~ tfl '0
o r"l UlI
01 rs:I H ..0 UU UO UU UU
\D HI t!J ::Er-I....:l
r-I lD nl
P::I ~
>< t!J rs:Il llJ,)
;j nl
.... rs:I~ !II ~Q r--
'0 nl
R :~ U >U'\ I
P:: ~ 01 <II <II <II <II <II <II '" <II '" \D
Q) g~~ NOO N\O r--r-I \0 00 ll'"
rs:I ll1M
Pi ~ nl
~ ~E1 H Q, NOO \Or"l \0\0 NO'\ I-<
eiO'\Ul Nr-I r-Ir-I r-Ir-I r-Ir-I II
H >U'\
*~ Q, I UlI 00 \0 q<r"l nl
I-<
~ ~oo3 IllU uu UU r-I \0 o III r-Ir-I g
r"lr"l Nr"l
..<1
.... H
P:: N
rs:I Q QI '" '" <II <II <II <II
NLfl \00 ON q<oo tJ nl nl
E-t 8~~ Ill.:x: Ill.:x: I-<J,)J,)
~ r--q< q<r"l O'\r-- Lf)OO nl nl nl
0:: Q, r-Ir-I r-Ir-I r-I r-I r-Ir-I lDQQ
rilOOUl ~"'...
Q, ;j"''''
I UlI ~"''''
~r--3 UU UU IllU UU OMM
U
g",...
~I J,)
III III III III ~~ III III ~~ III III ~
ril~ ril~ ZUl ril~ tJ
tJ
~
J,)
II tJ
~ r-i r-i ..Q 5
!:: !:: !:: Hltl ltl 'tl N
~ ~ ~ H-M ~-M II
ltl ltl ltl .j..l Hl-l Hl-l I-<'tl
r-i r-i r-i ~Ul +J H+J tJ II
J,) tJ
'0 '0 '0 H 00 00 Hm ~ ~
~o ~o ~o l-l 00 ::l ::l tJ lD
HO HO HO mltl ltl'O 00'0 u
H~ H~ H~ me r-i!:: Ul!:: ::t:
lDp.,
H H H ltlO UH ltlH ll:E
r-i r-i r-i .....
E-< 00 00 Ul Ultl U, I-<U'\
Z 00 00 Ul ~ Q, J,)N
~ nl
ril ltl'O ltl'O ltl'O +J'O OJ tJlDJ,)
~ r-i:> r-i:> r-i:> . I Ul:> 01 tJ nl
Ur-i Ur-i Ur-i '0 r-i .ltl tJ'tlQ
ril ~Ill ~Ill ~Ill :> l-llll +J+J ~;j
ll1~N
Ul r-i+J ltl Ul!:: ~U'"
.>. .>. .>. IllUl e>. 0 ..... ~ '"
+Jltl +Jltl +J ltl Oltl !:: l-l CIlHM
Ullll Ullll Ullll >.t-:l r-illl oM tL.
ltl ltl ltl
ril ::x: t-:l III Q, ::E " MN
\D
tIl
O.
~tIl
U
wPl
tI1fEl
PlH
t:~
Lt'I~
O\~
0\
M
)(
oM
'0
~
CD
P.
~
I
w
tI1
W
C)
~
U
~
w
t
H
~
H
~
W
~
~
N 01
o~~
Op..~
H p..
g5\D(/)
p.. , (/)\
~L03
O~OI
Op..~
H ~
g5LOB}
p.. , (/)1
~~3
~Ol
... u ~
><..-I~
0:( p..
O,(/)
,a
o M (/)1
H ,,0
~N~
..-I
~Ol
... u ~
><N~
o:(..-Ip..
O'(/)
'a
OM(/)I
HuO
~..-I~
..-I
Lt'I
o
CO
I
H
'"' 01
8~~
H p..
&5"'(/)
p.. , (/)1
~co3
'0 01
8~~
ex p..
~co(/)
p.. , (/)1
~t-3
~..-I
..-10
NM
coo:(
oco
..-ILO
NN
coo:(
LO\D
ON
NN
coco
~I
coco
~~
ltl
.jJ
~...-t
H ~
HO
HCO
00 ltl
OON
ro.-t
.-tp..
u'
~~
W
.-t
.CJ
'0
exltl
.jJ
roo..-t
.jJ~
o..-t 0
~CO
o
CO
E-<
Z
~
?5
~
(/)
"' "'
NO
C'I..-I
..-I M
Uo:(
"' "'
~N
NM
NM
Uo:(
"' "'
M..-I
LOa
NM
COo:(
"' "'
"'\D
~N
NM
coo:(
"' "'
N\D
\DO
NM
coo:(
"' "'
M~
LOa
NM
coo:(
ffi~
ltl
.jJ
~OO
H .rl
H:>
001:::
oow
ltl'O
.-tOO
U orl
~::I:
.jJo.
(/)0
.jJ
::I:.-t
.-t
.jJ o..-t
OO::I:
ltl
~
~LO
COC'l
N..-I
o:(CO
"' "'
0..-1
N\D
N..-I
lXlU
"' "'
CO..-l
..-I co
N..-I
COU
O~
N'"
N..-I
coco
ffi~
H
H
H
OO.jJ
0000
row
.-tH
UU
~W
.-t
.ro
'O::I:
ex
,
~5
'rl
'U
Wltl
.-tZ
W
E-<
at-
\D~
NN
o:(CO
C'I~
t-LO
NN
<0:(
NC'I
co~
NN
o:(lXl
ffi~
H
H
H
OOH
00 W
ltl'O
.-tl:::
Ultl
~W
.-t
WO
~,
ww
0100
1:::0
ltlH
H.-t
OW
~
~
M C'I
O~
~M
o:(CO
I I
oco
cot-
MM
0:(0:(
ffi~
H
00
00
ltlH
.-tW
U'O
~I:::
ro
'W
'O.-t
exO
>.,
W
.-tW
.-too
ltl 0
:>H
.-t
>.W
ltl~
.jJ
o
Ii
o
",-l
oW
U
~
oW
m
5
u
'tl
oS
o
l<
o
oW
Cl
.g
moS-
CloW
;j oS oS
.-l/:~ oW
oS oS
>lll'tl
~
Cl~o
tn rl :z;
oS
l<
Cl
>lll.
oS
l<
5
..t:
N
"
"
~~~
oS III III
mOO
~"'''''
~~~
orlrl
U
~"'''''
oW
~
Cl
Cl
)
oW
Cl Cl
.Q ~
o
'tl N
Cl
l<'tl
Cl Cl
oW Cl
~p.
Cl m
u
II:
mil<
Cl:l:
.,-l
l<lll
oWN
~ oS
ClmoW
Cl III
Cl'tlO
.-i;j
tn.-i N
~U~
",-l ~ ~
fIl....rl
I
IlQ
tI1
i
P:
E
H
~
P:
I!!
~
~
o
Eo<<
. rl N
......
......
\D
.....
Appendix 7
1995 TMP
Arterial Segments Operating
at ~ Mid LOS C
7-1
"
Appendix 7
1995 THP
ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT S KID LOS C
~
Third Ave. (4th/C St. - B St. 1) - Class III
Lower Half of LOS C
Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C
Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Range
NB 12:30 - 1:00 15.6 2.6 13 - 19
NB 1:00 - 1:30 15.3 2.3 (6 MPH)
NB 4:30 - 5:00 16.0 3.0
SB 12:00 - 12:30 15.6 2.6
SB 1:00 - 1:30 14.9 1.9
SB 5:00 - 5:30 15.4 2.4
LOS D
Avg. MPH Below LOS C LOS D ~
Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Range
SB 4:00 - 4:30 12.8 0.2 9 - 13
(4 MPH)
East B St. (SW Col. Ent- Rutgers Ave.) - Class II
Lower Half of LOS C
Avg. MPH Above LOS D
Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed
EB 7:30 - 8:00 19.3 1.3
EB 12:30 - 1:00 18.6 0.6
WB 7:30 - 8:00 21. 0 3.0
WB 12:00 - 12:30 20.7 2.7
WB 1:00 - 1:30 18.8 0.8
WB 4:30 - 5:00 19.7 1.7
WB 5:30 - 6:00 19.8 1.8
LOS C
Range
18 - 24
(6 MPH)
-
LOS D
None
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
7-2
f"" c-::1 ,'.~""
Appendix 7
1995 TMP
ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT S MID LOS C
Otay Lakes Rd. (East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) - Class I
Lower Half of LOS C
Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C
Dir. Time Speed Threshold Speed Range
NB 7:00 - 7:30 22.7 0.7 22 - 28
NB 8:00 - 8:30 22.2 0.2 (6 MPH)
NB 1:00 - 1:30 22.9 0.9
SB 8:00 - 8:30 23.3 1.3
SB 11:30 - 12:00 24.0 2.0
SB 12:00 - 12:30 24.2 2.2
SB 1:00 - 1:30 24.5 2.5
SB 5:00 - 5:30 24.3 2.3
LOS D
Avg. MPH Below MPH above LOS D
Dir. Time Speed LOS C Speed LOS E Ranqe
NB 7:30 - 8:00 18.0 4.0 1.0 17 - 22
NB 8:30 - 9:00 20.5 1.5 3.5 (5 MPH)
NB 11:30 - 12:00 21.1 0.9 4.1
NB 4:00 - 4:30 21.1 0.9 4.1
NB 4:30 - 5:00 17.5 4.5 0.5
NB 5:00 - 5:30 18.1 3.9 1.1
NB 5:30 - 6:00 21. 2 0.8 4.2
SB 7:30 - 8:00 21.7 0.3 4.7
7-3
(/
Appendix 7
~
1995 THP
ARTERIAL SEGMENTS OPERATING AT S HID LOS C
Palomar St. (I-5 NB Rmps - Broadway) - Class III
Lower Half of LOS C
Avg. MPH Above LOS D LOS C
Dir. Time Speed Thresh9ld Speed Range
EB 11:30 - 12:00 15.3 2.3 13 - 19
EB 12:00 - 12:30 15.0 2.0 (6 MPH)
EB 4:30 - 5:00 15.8 2.8
EB 5:00 - 5:30 14.5 1.5
EB 5:30 - 6:00 15.4 2.4
WB 11:30 - 12:00 16.0 3.0
WB 12:00 - 12:30 14.6 1.6
WB 1:00 - 1:30 15.9 2.9
WB 4:00 - 4:30 14.2 1.2
WB 5:00 - 5:30 15.9 2.9
-,
LOS D
None
-
7-4
'1
MEMORANDUM
February 13, 1996
File: 0610-95-GY051
TO: Bob Leiter, Director of Planning
VIA: Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engin~
FROM: Steve Thomas, Senior Civil Engineer r-
SUBJECT: Status of Transportation Long Range funding and monitoring projects
Development Phasin1: and Monitorina: policy
The pending development Phasing and Monitoring policy is a proposed amendment to the
Growth Management Ordinance, which will guide staff in its determination of whether a proposed
project complies with adopted threshold standards, particularly transportation thresholds.
The policy proposes that the City perform an initial traffic analysis utilizing SANDAG's Tranplan
computer model. The analysis would consider the existing roadway system and existing developed
properties, plus properties with transportation entitlements in the following categories:
· Projects where the City has entered into Development Agreements reserving or
promising transportation capacity.
. Projects that have prepaid Transportation Development Impact Fees through
assessment district financing of major transportation improvements
. Projects where a Final Subdivision Map creating the final developable lots has
recorded
. Public and Quasi-Public projects which are proposed to be constructed within 5 to
10 years, based on Project Public Facility Financing Plans and City Capital
Improvement Programs
This analysis will be termed "initial baseline traffic analysis". While it is anticipated that this initial
baseline analysis will not demonstrate any threshold problems, the significant number of properties
with entitlement may necessitate action by the City to maintain threshold standards. Such action
could involve construction of some road facilities, although it may only entail signalization
improvements, or other relatively minor corrective action.
Subsequent projects seeking approval of Final Subdivision Maps or discretionary approvals must
demonstrate that their project can be accommodated by the roadway system, or provide
improvements to maintain compliance with the Growth Management Ordinance.
The Growth Management Oversight Committee reviewed the development monitoring and phasing
1995 TMP
2
February 13, 1996
.......
policy in draft form last year. At that time, the Committee heard testimony that the policy seemed
confusing and unclear, although the concept was considered workable. Staff has worked to make
the proposed policy more clear, and will be providing a explanation of the concepts and procedures
to provide a clearer picture of how the policy will be implemented and what the implications are to
each project. It is anticipated that the policy will be presented to the Planning Commission in April,
1996, with the clarifications requested by the Growth Management Oversight Committee and the
public.
Transportation Phasine Plan Update
The next proposed update to the Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan (TPP) is expected to
coincide with the update of the Transportation Development Impact Fee program to jointly consider
the impacts of adoption of the General Plan Amendment and General Development Plan for the Otay
Ranch.
The current TPP, which was prepared in 1991 identifies phasing of the roadway network up to the
point where it identified the need for a freeway in the SR-125 corridor. The horizon year for the
study was 1995, although the study recognized that the results related more to development level
than actual year. Since that study, development patterns and the economic situation have deviated
substantially from those assumed in the study. Significant changes include:
.
Approval of Power Center, Kaiser and Otay Ranch
Foreclosure of Sunbow by the Resolution Trust Corporation
Growth rates of less than half those projected (development levels are occurring more
slowly)
Approval of the interim SR-125 study and adoption of the fee
-
.
.
.
While there is still uncertainty regarding the SR-125 freeway, the interim SR-125 study concluded
that a surface (non-freeway) roadway system could provide adequate capacity to the year 2007. As
discussed previously, real thresholds are related more to development patterns as opposed to years.
Thus, the horizon year (2007) in the interim SR-125 study may be more like 2010 or beyond. The
TPP update will analyze a post-SR-125 (freeway) situation to identify other potential constraints in
the development of the roadway network to build out of the Chula Vista sphere of influence.
Status Report on Planninl: and implementation ofthe interim S~-125 facilities
The Engineer's report and interim SR-125 fee program were approved by the City Council in
December 1993, with the implementation of the fee occurring on January 1, 1995. The Engineers
Report concluded that there would probably be no need to construct any of the facilities prior to
1999. Given that development in the recent years has been at a lower level than assumed in the
study, there may be no need for the facility for several years beyond 1999.
At this point, it is uncertain as to whether the proposed toll road will be constructed in the near
future. The Environmental Impact Report for the toll road is expected to be circulated for public
review in February, with final approval occurring approximately 1 year later.
-,
..':> . y\
1995 TMP
3
February 13, 1996
Staff is currently preparing for implementation of the Interim Program, with the knowledge that, if
the toll road is constructed, in the next 5 years or so, some of the interim facilities may not be
needed.
Status Report on Plannin~ and implementation of the Ota,y River Crossing Corridor Study
City Staff is currently meeting with staff from the City of San Diego, the County, SANDAG and
Caltrans to establish a interjurisdictional fee to fund the three river crossings: Paseo Ranchero (Otay
Valley Road), La Media and Alta Road. At this point, it has been identified that Paseo Ranchero
will probably need to be widened in approximately 2005. This widening may be minor in nature,
providing 4 full travel lanes where the current bridge only provides 2 lanes for traffic and 2
"auxiliary" lanes for Amphitheater events. La Media will not be needed until approximately 2015
and Alta Road much later, if at all. Staff is currently working to develop cost estimates for a
phasing and financing study. It is anticipated that the corridor study will be completed in July.
Following that, staff will be asking the City Council to adopt a fee program to implement the study.
(A\dev.CST)
MEMORANDUM
January 17, 1996
File: TF-215
TO: Steve Thomas, Senior Civil Engineer
VIA: Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Director of Public Works! City Eny).n~
FROM: William A. Ullrich, Senior Civil Engineer I/>>^
SUBJECT: GMOC INFORMATION FOR THE 1995 REPORT
This is a response to the memorandum sent by Hal Rosenberg on November 30, 1995 requesting
information relating to the Otay Ranch SPA One traffic studies.
Traffic studies were done for Otay Ranch SPA One (SP A One) in more detail than usual. In
addition to the buildout projections, traffic projections in 5 year increments were performed That
study was completed to analysis when east-west roadways would be needed with the projected
traffic generated by those projects which had tentative map approval at the time of the study
(1995). Growth in Chula Vista was assumed at approximately 1400 dwelling units per year.
The Phasing analysis was done on a worse case basis because SR-125 was not considered to be in
place nor was the interim facility.
PHASING ANALYSIS STREET SYSTEM
YEAR 2000
The analysis for year 2000 tested the existing system with growth from all those projects with
tentative map approval and SPA I.
YEAR 2005
The analysis for the year 2005 was done for two alternative street systems. The analysis added to
the system one of the following street segments:
1. Palomar Street extended and the 1/2 diamond inplace at 1-805 or,
2. Orange Avenue constructed as a 6 lane prime arterial to Paseo Ranchero and 4 lanes to the
east of Pas eo Ranchero.
~ J
t
Steve Thomas
2
January 17, 199p
YEAR 2010
The analysis for the year 2010 was done for two alternative street systems. The analysis added to
the system one of the following combination of street segments:
~.
1. Palomar Street extended as a four lane major with the half-diamond and Orange Avenue
extended as a four lane facility or,
2. Palomar Street extended as a four lane facility with no interchange improvements at I-80S and
Orange Avenue constructed as a 6 lane prime to Paseo Ranchero and a four lane facility to the
east of Pas eo Ranchero.
POTENTIAL CIRCULATION SYSTEM ISSUES
The potential issues that have been raised by the studies are:
1. The interchange improvements at I-80S and Telegraph Canyon Rd, I-80S and Palomar Street,
or I-80S and Orange Avenue will be needed prior to buildout of SPA 1.
2. A new east-west roadway will need to be in place by the year 2000 if SPA I is developed and
the other projections used in the study are realized. That would require either Palomar Street or
Orange Avenue to be constructed to a four lane facility from the existing improvements east ofI-
805 through SPA I. -.
3. Portions of East "H" Street will fall below acceptable levels of service with Southbay built out.
Since the run was completed with the current classification per the adopted Chula Vista General
Plan, either intersection improvements will have to be installed or the roadway upgraded to an
eight lane facility from I-80S easterly to Paseo del Rey if the projections are realized. Project
contribution to these segments of East "H" Street are not considered significant.
4. The portion of Telegraph Canyon Road from Medical Center Drive to Paseo Ladera must be
widened to six lanes and improvements at Telegraph Canyon Road and I-80S completed prior to
the year 2000.
5. The segment of Paseo Ranchero from Palomar Street to Orange Avenue is projected to be at
LOS D at full buildout when making the determination based upon the number of trips a six lane
prime arterial can accommodate. Since the threshold standards are currently based on travel time,
this is one section of Pas eo Ranchero that needs to be monitored. Intersection improvements to
provide a grade separation intersection at Orange Avenue and Paseo Ranchero may alleviate any
problem within this segment of Pas eo Ranchero.
6. The study also shows other intersections that may need various improvements at buildout of
the Southbay which differ somewhat from previous traffic studies done under Series 7 analysis. I
have attached Tables 9.12 and 9.13 for your reference.
-.
7. The SPA I study also indicates that 1-805 will experience unacceptable LOS similar to
previous studies.
.:e and Identi cation of Miti ation
TABLE 9.12
RECOMMENDED MITIGATION FOR HIGH VOLUME INTERSECTIONS
FULL SOUTHBA Y BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
Recommended .
Daily Entering Mitigation Stage
Intersection Location Volume (vpd) 1 2 3
13. East H 5t./Hidden Vista 66,500 X
26. Telegraph Canyon Rd./Otay Lakes Rd. 82,000 X
29. Otay Lakes Rd./Eastlake Pkwy. 87,500 X
36. Palomar 51. / Paseo Ranchero 70,500 X
43. Orange Ave./Paseo Ranchero 100,000 X
44. Orange Ave./La Media Rd. 73,500 X
46. Orange A ve./Eastlake Pkwy. 66,000 X
47. Otay Valley Rd./Oleander Ave. 76,000 X
48. Otay Valley Rd./Brandywine Rd. 79,500 X
49. Heritage Rd./Otay Mesa Rd. 70,500 X
50. Otay Mesa Rd./La Media Rd. 88,000 X
51. Otay Mesa Rd./Harvest Rd. 90,000 X
52. Otay Mesa Rd./5anyo Ave. 82,500 X
53. Otay Mesa Rd./Paseo de las Americas 70,500 X
54. Otay Mesa Rd./lndustrial Mesa N/5 1 68,500 X
55. 5iempre Viva Rd./Enrico Fermi Rd. 71,500 X
56. 5iempre Viva Rd./Paseo de las Americas 88,000 X
57. Otay Valley Rd./Paseo Ranchero 103,000 X
58. La Media/Otav Valley Rd. 76,000 X
SOURCE: SANDAG Buildout Conditions Model Run (5/3/95); BRW, Inc.; May 1995.
Stage 1 _ 65,000-75,000 entering vpd may require mitigation measures to enhance intersection geometries and increase capacity. These
at-grade intersection design treatments may include wuestricted free right-turn lanes and/or additional through lanes where
appropriate.
Stage 2 _ 75,000-85,000 entering vpd require the design and implementation of mitigation measures to significantly enhance standard
intersection geometries and increase capacity. These intersection design treatments may include either at-grade solutions
described in the previous category or the grade separated solutions described below.
Stage 3 _ Over 85,000 entering vpd requires the design and implementation of mitigation measures to allow the intersection to flow
smoothly. Mitigation at this level typically includes partial grade separations and/or fully grade separated design to vertically
separate heavy through movements at different grades.
E\2SnOOO\R \ TRANSTDY.RPT\CHAI'TER9.REV
9-52
Otay Ranch SPA One
Transportation Study Report
BRW, Inc.
9.0 Annlysis of Sif(1lifit.. .e and Identification of Mitigation
TABLE 9.13 ......
SERIES 7 VERSUS SERIES 8 FORECASTS FOR INTERSECTION OPERATIONS
FULL SOUTHBA Y BUILDOUT CONDITIONS
Series 7 Mitigation Series 8 Mitigation
Intersection Volume Sta~e Volume Stage
13. East H St./Hidden Vista < 65,000 N/A 66,500 1
16. East H St./Otay Lakes Rd. 88,000 3 < 65,000 N/A
26. Telegraph Canyon Rd./Otay Lakes Rd. 81,000 2 82,000 2
29. Otay Lakes Rd./Eastlake Pkwy. 67,000 1 87,500 3
36. Palomar St./Paseo Ranchero < 65,000 N/A 70,500 1
43. Orange Ave./Paseo Ranchero 78,000 2 100,000 3
44. Orange A ve./La Media Rd. 89,500 3 73,500 1
46. Oran~e Ave./Eastlake Pkwy. 79,000 2 66,000 1
47. Otay Valley Rd./Oleander Ave. < 65,000 N/A 67,500 1
48. Otay Valley Rd./Brandywine Rd. < 65,000 N/A 73,500 1
49. Heritage Rd.IOtay Mesa Rd. < 65,000 N/A 73,500 1
50. Otay Mesa Rd./La Media Rd. 65,100 1 88,500 3
51. Otay Mesa Rd./Harvest Rd. < 65,000 N/A 94,000 3
52. Otay Mesa Rd./Sanyo Ave. < 65,000 N/A 82,000 2
53. Otay Mesa Rd./Paseo de las Americas < 65,000 N/A 71,500 1
54. Otay Mesa Rd./Industrial Mesa N IS 1 < 65,000 N/A 68,500 1
55. Siempre Viva Rd./Enrico Fermi Dr. < 65,000 N/A 69,000 1
56. Siempre Viva Rd./Paseo de las Americas < 65,000 N/A 84,300 2
57. Otay Valley Rd./Paseo Ranchero 81,500 2 97,000 3
58. La Media Rd.IOtay Valley Rd. < 65,000 N/A 71,000 1
Eastlake Pkwy./Birch Rd. 76,000 2 < 65,000 N/A
La Media Rd. / Birch Rd. 68,500 1 < 65,000 N/A
SOURCE: IHK & Associates Otay Ranch Traffic Analysis (July 1992); BRW, Inc.; May 1995.
BRW, Inc.
Otay Ranch SPA One
Transportation Study Report
E\28nOOO\R \ TRANSTDY.RPT\CHA.PTER9.REV
9-53
......
-
"".".-;.
AWG~'O~' l-
INTERDEPARTMENT AL CORRESPONDENCE
DATE:
February 13, 1996
SUBJECT:
Growth Management Oversight Commission
John D. Goss, City Manager 8-
Robert W. Powell, Director of Finance/tf
FISCAL OVERVIEW
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
The purpose of this report is to update the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC)
regarding the general fiscal status of the City of Chula Vista and to provide specific data related
to Development Impact Fees (DIF).
FISCAL STATUS
Over the past several years Chula Vista has been contending with a prolonged recession that has
finally shown signs of a slow recovery over the past two years. In the middle of FY94-95 the
Mexican Peso was devalued, which has negatively impacted the recovery here in Chula Vista.
During the recession, the State of California also took away significant revenues from local
governments. No additional revenues were taken in FY94-95, but previously imposed takeaways
were still in effect. Now that State revenues are showing improvement, the State is proposing
to give additional money to the schools, but no serious proposal has been introduced to restore
the money taken away from cities. As a result of the economy, the City has managed the
difficult task of maintaining most service levels with resources that have not kept pace with the
cost of those services. A brief summary of the 1994-95 General Fund activity is included in
Attachment 1.
Overall revenues increased $1,627,857 (3.4%). However, $1,878,000 in revenues came from
the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) as a surplus refund. Chula Vista will receive
an additional $1,673,957 during FY95-96. These are one-time reimbursements based on
actuarial evaluations. Without the one-time revenue, the overall revenues decreased $250,142.
Reimbursements for staff time worked on capital improvement projects, redevelopment and DIF
funded activities decreased $577,000 from FY93-94. Sales tax revenue was $12,435,487
compared to $12,172,301 in FY93-94. Before the Peso devaluation, the City had anticipated
a larger increase. Other local taxes such as franchise, utility users, transient lodging and
business license taxes declined $54,855. Licenses and permits increased $132,438 and fines,
forfeitures and penalties increased $96,387. Investment and rental earnings decreased $234,056,
mostly due to a decrease in the available cash for investment and in decreasing interest rates.
The final phase-in of the property tax shift by the State was completed in FY94-95. This has
meant a permanent on-going loss of $2,193,000 in property tax revenue to the City. For FY94-
95 property tax revenues increased $208,271 or 2.6% to $7,988,384.
-- , .I
,
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-2-
February 13, 1996
-
The revenues from outside sources are augmented by transfers-in to the General Fund which
support general operations from special funds such as Sewer, Library, Transit and Traffic and
Safety.
The FY94-95 expenditure total of $53,909,000 was $1,810,332 (3.2 %) below the FY93-94 total
of $55,719,332. The expenditure decrease was mainly achieved by freezing and eliminating
vacant positions throughout many city departments and cutting back on supplies and services.
These savings in expenditures were achieved while adding library staff in the middle of the year
for the opening of the new South Chula Vista Library.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
The purpose of the City's DIF programs are to identify public facilities and improvements
required to support future development within the City of Chula Vista's general planning area.
Where an additional facility need is created by future development, the cost associated with the
new need is apportioned to future development in the form of a development impact fee.
In many instances, the construction of a particular facility is triggered when development reaches .
a certain number of units or level of traffic generation. If development slows down, then the
need for the facility is delayed. If development accelerates, then it also accelerates the need for
facilities. In some instances, developers advance fund and construct facilities and are given
credit against payment of future development impact fees.
-
The City of Chula Vista has several types of Development Impact Fees which were assessed
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1995. The major categories of DIFs are for transportation,
traffic signal, park, drainage, sewer and public facilities.
Attachment 2 are the DIF Financial Reports that indicate the revenue and expenditure activity
of each DIF Fund for FY 1994-95 and the Fund Balance in each as of June 30, 1995.
TRANSPORTATION DEVEWPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City
to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built
when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of 1-805. Prior to the
program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking
down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue
since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the
Eastern portion of Chu1a Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs
the street or a developer does, using the cost to offset the TransDIF fee at the building permit
stage. When the Interim Pre-SR125 Development Impact Fee was adopted the TransDIF was
updated and the fee changed from $3,060 to $3,998 per equivalent dwelling unit (BDD),
effective January 1995.
The major expenditures from the Transportation DIP were for street improvements for the
Rancho Del Rey Commercial Center ($310,000), Otay Valley Road Widening ($60,200), Otay
Lakes Road ($95,800), 1-805 traffic interchange studies (35,900), and Traffic Monitoring
Program ($71,000).
-
~,
,
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-3-
February 13, 1996
INTERIM PRE-SR125 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City
to finance transportation facilities in the Eastern Territories that would be needed to provide
adequate and safe transportation facilities if there are delays in the construction of State Route
.(SR) 125 by CALTRANS or others. The fee was adopted in January 1994, but implementation
was delayed until January 1995. The fee commencing in January 1995 was $820 per EDU.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE - This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal
needs for the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds
are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects that meet the warrants at the time
the funds are available. This is a city-wide fee with a FY94-95 rate of $13 per trip generated.
Projects installed or funded during FY94-95 include traffic signals at Telegraph Canyon Road
and Paseo Ladera, Otay Lakes Road and Gotham, 1-805 and Otay Valley Road, 1-805 and East
Orange, and a Bay Blvd traffic flash.
EASTLAKE PARK DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to
finance and coordinate the construction of new parks in the Eastlake I area which also
encompasses the north half of Eastlake Greens. The Eastlake park issue and DIF payments are
currently pending before the City Council for final resolution.
TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF - This fee is applicable to all new development
within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. The FY94-95 fee was $3,922 per acre and pays
for the construction of the Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake
Business Center and a portion of the channel west of 1-805.
Expenditures for FY94-95 were associated with the Telegraph Canyon Channel Design.
TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF - This is a fee for the expansion of the
trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The FY94-95 fee was $184 per EDU.
Expenditures for this DIF were only for staff administration of the DIF.
TELEGRAPH CANYON PUMPED SEWER DIF - This fee is collected for the expansion
of the Telegraph Canyon trunk sewer to serve those properties outside of the basin. These flows
are pumped into the trunk line temporarily and it is anticipated they will ultimately drain to
another basin, either Poggi or Salt Creek, by gravity. If Telegraph Canyon basin becomes built
out, there may be no reserve capacity for the temporary pumped flows and a parallel system
must be built. If, however, the capacity is never exceeded once the Telegraph Canyon gravity
basin is built out and no parallel system is built because of the temporary flows, the funds will
be returned to the current property owners. The FY94-95 fee was $560 per EDU.
SALT CREEK SEWER BASIN DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted in
December 1994 to provide the necessary financing to construct the Salt Creek Interceptor. This
fee is applicable to the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, that portion of the Upper Otay Lake Basin north
of the Salt Creek Sewer Basin, and that portion of the Lower Otay Lake Basin east of the Salt
Creek Sewer Basin. The fee adopted was $284 per EDU.
'I'
"'II.
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-4-
February 13, 1996
.-.
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF - The Public Facilities DIF is a city-wide fee with several
components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new
development. Prior to July 1993, the separate fee components collected for the different public
facilities were placed in separate funds. Funds from one facility component fund could not be
used to fmance projects of another facility component, regardless of the need for, or timing of
the various projects. Loans were made from other City funds for project components with
insufficient cash. Under the current ordinance, fees collected after July 1993 for the separate
fee components are consolidated in a single fund rather than in separate facility funds. Thus, the
funds are available for whichever approved project is currently scheduled and interfund loans
are minimized. For FY94-95 the total fee for all components was $2,150 per EDU.
The components of the Public Facilities DIF with the associated fee are as follows:
ADMINISTRATION ($79) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program,
overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of
costs, etc. This fee is set at 2 % of the other Public Facilities DIFs charged.
CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($527) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic
Center Master Plan prepared in 1989, to provide sufficient building space and parking
for the existing and anticipated staff and the public. .
The major expenditures in FY94-95 were for acquiring property for Civic Center
expansion ($63,400) and expansion of the Civic Center parking lot ($92,500).
_.
POLICE FACILITY ($235) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic
Center Master Plan, which included upgrading of the communications center,
construction of a new crime lab, office improvements and installation of new
communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a new
computer aided dispatch system (CAD), a new Records Management System, and new
Mobile Digital Terminals.
Expenditures for FY94-95 related to the Request for Proposal for the Public Safety CAD
system.
CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($515) - Relocation of the City's existing
corporation yard from the bayfront area to a site more centrally located and of a larger
size. The existing site is near capacity.
Approximately $7,500 was expended on the Corporation Yard master plan.
LmRARIES ($544) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista
library and Eastern Territories library(ies), and installation of a new automated library
system.
,-.
Approximately $1,660,000 was expended on the new South Chula Vista Library,
including expansion of the Library automation system.
> '
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-5-
February 13, 1996
FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($141) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Station
#4 & #3, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig,
expansion of Fire Station #1, installation of a radio communications tower and
construction of an interim and permanent Station #6.
The major expenditure in this account was $7,015 for property tax reimbursement for the
Eastlake interim fire station.
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMA nON SYSTEM ($49) - Purchase and installation of a GIS
system for mapping of various base maps and creation of geo-data files to aid in planning
and processing of land developments.
This project is a multi-year installation project with FY94-95 expenditures of $46,400.
MAINFRAME COMPUTER ($23) - Purchase and installation of a new mainframe
computer and various enhancements to meet existing and future needs for additional
memory and storage space and enhanced processing speed.
Minor expenses of $489 were expended on this project.
TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE ($32) - Upgrading and expansion of the City's
existing telephone system to accommodate growth, including installation of new conduit,
wiring additional telephone lines, and a voice processing system.
Expenditures were $49,122 repayment of the Trunk Sewer Fund advance with interest
and a $14,385 lease/purchase payment.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ($5) - Updating and modernization of the
existing records system to prepare the City for anticipated increases in transactions and
volumes of records.
RECOMMEND A nON FROM FY93-94 GMOC FINAL REPORT
In the FY93-94 Final Report, the GMOC recommended that 5-year development projections be
incorporated into the Public Facilities DIF updates, as has been done for the other DIFs.
The next major update of the Public Facilities DIF will be timed with the approval of the first
final maps from the Otay Ranch, since the Public Facilities DIF does not yet include the Otay
Ranch. This update should occur during FY95-96 or FY96-97. At that time, the Public
Facilities DIF update can include program scheduling that projects the future needs and revenues
for the next five years. In the meantime, the City's CIP process remains the primary planning
document for Public Facility DIF projects.
m:\uaen\IIUUDC\ploc95.mcm
ATTACHMENT 1
~
GENERAL FUND ~
AVAIIABLE FUND BAIANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 1995
Begi.nni..rKj Balance 7/01/94 6,162,284
1994-95 ~ 48,991,128
Transfers-In 6,714,110
Transfers-o..rt (1,870,751)
EXpenditures 1994-95 (53, 909,000)
Net Increase/Decrease in Reserves (319,835)
Prior Year Adjustment to F\1rrl Balance 448,714 ,-.
Available F\1rrl Balance as of 6/30/95 6,216,650
..-..
ATTACHMENT 1
..,~...>
,^-
I/)
UI
UI
~
I-
~
~
~;:
I/)Z
:;:UI
~~~
::>9t
5~>
~UI~
00
~~
-I-
U-
.....
~
~
Q
.....
III
::>
lL
~
~
.....
~
...
...
J
cJ!
...
I-
8ffi
It:~o
8Cl'"
<CO
UlZ
It:~
UI
Z:;r
~~ll!
lL-liS
UI~
u:ll/)
I-
UlIt:
~~
It:::>!lll
~lLliS
!:~
~U
U
:i:1/)
lL>
<I/),...
It:oliil
8~
UI!:
Cl
~
UlI/)~
9:lL
~lL
::>
I/)
I/)
UI
~~
III
::;
Oz
It: I-
~<X
lL8liS
It:.....
8~
UI~
U-~
-.....
.....-
~~
It:
QUI~
>1-
_Z
UUI
U
;
...
It:
~
>-
.....
<
U
I/)
ii:
~
is
I/)
'lJ
~
::;
~
~
U
::;
III
::>
lL
Z
~...
~liil
Z
UI
Cl
8l
...
~
tt
~
o :,...
i'Q8l::l
~18~
~~.N
...
--
i
Ol
:0
N
...
0000
~
~
oo~~
....
::....
~
~
0000
~
~
oo~~
0l0l
NN
(:!.N
~
i
vi
N
C'l
...
oPJ~o
~t::;':
..
;::
~
~
~
Ol
;::
r-:
!
o CO N~
~~o;
vi en III
,......
e,...
~
I
o~~o
i;
o
Vi
I
N
...
~
N
...
~
N
C'l
CD
en
Gf.
;;
Olio
..iii
,......
(:!.
~
0000
~
~
UI
U
Z
~
~
Cl
Z
Z
z
(;
UI
III
I/)
Cl
Z
Z J=' Cl
~I/)~ ~
I/) I/) UI Z ...
UlI-It:- -
::>Z::>I/) 0
ZUlI-It: Q
~~iS~ It:
UlI-ZI/) UI
It:I/)UlZ CL
~~lL~ .....
is!:~1- ~
I-
8ffi
It:~lia~
8~~~
UlZ
It:~
UI
Z:;r
~~~~
fu~~lS
u:ll/)
I-
UlIt:
~~lD!lll
e:~"'i/S
i8~co
U
:i:1/)
lL>-lIl,...
<1/)...0
1t:00l1ll
8~C'lCO
UI!:
Cl
I/)
>-
UlI/)"~
It:lL'"
ii:lL~
::>
I/)
I/)
UI
-C'llQ
It:...i/S
~~CO
III
::;
Oz
It: I-
~<~~
~~~CO
8~
~~...~
-~'-ill
~~~co
~
~
~
~
It:
Q~~~
~ffi~itj
..... U
(:!.
;;
~
~
o
z
::>
~
;
...
Z
~~...
<~Ii:
i CO
UI
Cl
I
It:
~
>-
.....
~
ii:
~
is
I/)
UI
~
::;
~
~
U
::;
III
::>
lL
.....
g
I-
~
l
C'lNCO'Iii
::~C;;:Ofn
_S~{1Ii
~
;;
..
o
~
f::" ~oooo
~ is
g :si
~
~ ~oo!Ro
N'" III
~! ~
~ StOlOO
~ .n ---
~
~
~ 80~~0
~ i t!i
~
~
ci
N
;;
~~ooo
...C'l
r-:r-:
i
~~~io
....villi
i !;~
~.
&
~
i
1~000
":N
~..
i 100~0
m yJ N
... N ~
... --
~
i
~
~~ooo
~~
III
...
~ ~o~om
~ 2i ~ iii
~ ~
li
~
UI
U
5
~
Cl
Z
Z
Z
(;
UI
III
III
~
8 ~ ~
!: It: ~
Z J='~ Cl
It:::> Z
~I/)Q.~ ~
13~~!:~ UI
::>z::>l/)z 0
ZUlI-It:- 0
~~iS~6 ii:
Ull/)ffi~~ ~
It:UllL<-- .....
~~)(It:~ ~
O_WI-_ -
N
..
,...
c::i
N
CO
~
::s
~
.S:
...
N
...
..
~
13
III
c:~
u:,g
iS~
r .I~
i ~:
.f5
~ .!.! "Q.
~ :ziT
~ ctl
'Is :1
~ ...
~~.~i
~~I !
~ c:~5i .
5;::CO~!
-~'OIll~
19~1l
1;'2.!!"
~~~~~
~.!!! '.2
. .! . ] .11I
~ '2 t .r! ~
=~ij~
~I/l"';~
g!~;'o
'-ols.E
'2~~~'2
.i!~ g.iP'.
.l/! ::s c: t ~
j!:~.soiS
C'l
N
III
..
N
N
...
81
CO
~
...
...
!
~
...
...
~
lS
N
;;
CD
~
CD
C'l
C'l
;;
N
a;
III
...
.....
... .....
-- (:!.
it;
UI
o
Z
ATTACHMENT 2
ATTACHMENT 2
.;':,>
10
01
I
'ot
01
~
0::
o
u.
en
w
w
u.
f-
~
Q..
~
f-
Z
W
~
Q..
o
...J
W
>
W
o
~
en
:>
:5
::::l
J:
U
u.
o
~
U
~
co
'ot
o
....
~~
Wen
w<
o::alO
Uo::r--
f-WCO
~~
en
~
lJ
Ql
U.
cJ,
....
10
N
....
0::
en 10
~CO
"CO
W
I-
~
0::
ZW
~~
ZenOl
~@~
...JQ..
W~
f-::::l
Q..
W
e!)
<CO
ZN
~CO
o
Z
O~
~~~
ule!)
I-
W
~....
f-N
en CO
Lfi
Z
o
~
f-
0::....
ON
Q..CO
en
~
I-
~
e!)
Ci5....
0....
_N
U.
~
....
o
Z
:J
u.
o C")~
..,. C") ....
CO
cD
~
000 .....
~
CO
~
~ ~~OOOO
aiar>
N
C")
~
CO
....
01
N
....
..,.
OCOOOOO
N.....
COO
iN
..,.
01
'ot
'ot
M
N
10
~
'otOlNOOO
10 COOl
o coco
ooai
1OC")'ot
.... -
..,.
8
.....
ar>
C")
..,.
NCO~OOO
0l1OC")
.....COIO
ON....-
N -
~
01
10
01
N
'ot
r--
~
.... 00
o
....
o
'ot
CO
.....
....
g
CO
-.f
..,.
'otIONOO.....
coC")C") 01
CO....Ol .....
~ar>~ .....
OIOCO 01
CONr--
~ -
'ot
....
CO
~
~
CO....ONOO
.....10 ....
OCO 01
N~ N
:;co ~
..,. -
~
....
Ie
l:;
W
o
Z
5
c:(
al
e!)
Z
Z
Z
C5
W
al
al
~
::::l
wU
en uffi
~ -~~
Z Sou.
0:: 0<>
enLfimz~m
W - 0::
::::ll-O::enl-
zffi~O::ffi~
~~iS~~o
Wenzen>-w
o::ww~<o
u.>Q..ii:Q..o
iS~~I-~~
.-"
o
~
10
C")
C")
~
CO
....
CO
01
~
01
01
'ot
:;
~
01
....
CO
r--
10
~
o
~
C")
CO
.....
~
.-.
o
'ot
o
N
CO
01
'ot
~
o
C")
CO
C")
CO
.....
..,.
10
'!
o
~
e!)
z
is
z
W
o
o
"
W
Q..
W
i
.-.
,- ,. '-f'
f-<
en
.(
U
f-< ~
U \C
- 0 e'I
~ ~ e'I
f-< ...
en f-< ~
-
Q - ~
:z =:l
> ;J ~
.(
f-< C ~
0 :z u
- ~
I en Q
.( ;;;;J
f-< 0 lfl
en :t e'I
- e'I
> :t ...
.( f-< >
...;I :z ...;I
;J 0 t;
:t ~
U
ClO
...
I
l"'l
...
P\~V(<NQ\-Jt yY)
0 f') r- N - f') 0 0 \0 o f') 0 lI"\
- - 00 N lI"\ ~ - ~
lI"\ f') - - - f')
(.L. -
CIl ....l r/J
...l <l: 0 0 0 0 \0 0 0 0 00 0 ~
<l: Z 00
\0 f') 0
fo- Ei: (.L. - N
0 ~
fo-
fo- 0 lI"\ f') lI"\ \0 \0 0 0 0 o f') 0 00
CIl 0 - - N f') f') ~ - r-
< \0 f') N - - ~
U (.L. -
~ W r/J
~ ~
r/J \0 0 0 0 0 r- 0 0 0 00 0 f')
0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 f')
'- (.L. N - ~
~
f') f') lI"\ 0\ r- 0 0\ \0 N
r- - 00 r- N 0\
(.L. - - ~
\0 r/J
0\ ....l
0\ <l:
- Z
0:: lI"\ 0 lI"\
W Ei: (.L. f') f')
CO ~
~
W
U 00 0\ lI"\ f') 0 0 \0 -
W N 0 00 \0 f') - f')
Cl (.L. N - lI"\
r/J
, W
>- ~
....l r/J 0 0 \0 0 \0
~ ~ (.L. ~ ~ - 0\
N N
-. ~
r- N N N f') 0 lI"\ r- OO
- N \0 ~ N 0\ \0
(.L. N - lI"\
\0 ....l r/J
0\ <l:
0\
- Z \0 \0 0 N
W Ei: (.L. ~ - \0
~ ~
-.
, \0 lI"\ N ~ r- 0 0\ \0 0\
>- f') 0\ 00 lI"\ - N -
0:: (.L. N lI"\
<l: W r/J
~ ~
Z r/J \0 lI"\ 0 -
<l: ~ (.L. N f') \0
-.
~
f') N lI"\ f') N lI"\
N 00 f') N N 00
(.L. - N
lI"\ ....l r/J
0\
0\ <l:
- Z
0:: N lI"\ r-
Ei: N 00 0
W (.L. -
CO ~
~
W 00
U - 0\ 00 0\ 0\ lI"\ r-
W ~ 0 ~ - 0\ N
(.L. - - ~
Cl r/J
, W
>- ~
....l r/J 0 \0 \0
~ ~ (.L. N lI"\ r-
-. ~
r/J
....l
vi <
fo-
fo- 0
r/J .....
en W vi
Z
..... Z :I: 0 :I:.....
U W U >- Ur/J
W ZW
W 0:: Z Z
-. ~ ~~
0 9 <l:
c.::: - :I: U
~ :::: :::: - ~ ~ u :I: ....l~ 0::
W - - W W Wo W
....l W <l: <l: <l: Z ~ ~....l :I:
....l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O<l: .....
W < r/J r/J r/J U U -~ 0
co ....l 0 ~.....
z ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... >- W U
r/J ci ci ci ....l ....l <l: ....l Zr/J r/J
<l: <l: <l: <l: ..... W <<l: 52
r/J W ~ ~ ~ r/J r/J 0 ..... r/JW
~
<l: Cl
~
r- eo
'"
N '"
f')
0 ~
- Cll
::l
0\ c
Cll
~ ...,
lI"\
-
~
r-
N
-
-
-
0\
r/J
W
0
r- ~
N W
lI"\ >
<l:
...l
<
~
~
<l:
r-
N
00
o
f')
\0
o
00
lI"\
N
0\
f')
~
0
lI"\
r/J
....l
<l:
.....
0
.....
~
~
r/J
~
'"
~I
a::
0
u.
9
'"
'"
u
0
::;:
9
<1:
-;;; 1/
.../,;0
1-0 1-0
rJ'J
U -(
- u
a::
1-0 ~
rJ'J a:: ~
- 0 0\
Q '- 0\
-
a:: 1-0 a::
~ - ~
1-0 ;z =
< ~ ~
~ e" ~
1-0 U
~ ;z ~
~ -
rJ'J Q
~ ;;J
rJ'J 0 III
I ::c 0\
< 0\
::c -
1-0 >-
rJ'J 1-0
- ;z ..;j
> 0 ;;J
< ~ ...,
..;j
;;J <:lO
::c -
.
U M
-
0 0 0 N 0 ""
- -
u...
~ </l
</l Z 0 0 'J:> 0 0 ~
.....l G: N - ""
-< u...
f- ~
0
f-
0 0 0 N 0 ""
f- - -
</l
-< u...
U U..l </l
~ ::J "N
</l 0 'J:> 'J:> 0 0
0 ~ "" - '"
u... u...
~
0 N - ""
- -
u...
'J:> .....l </l
CI'
CI' -<
- z fo
c.:: 0
U..l G: u... N N
CO ~
~
U..l 0
U 0
U..l u...
0 (/)
. U..l
>- ::J 100
.....l (/) 00
;::J ~ u... - -
-, ~
0 0
u...
'J:> .....l </l
CI' -<
CI' ~
- Z 'J:>
U..l G: u... - -
Z ~
;::J
-,
. 0 N - ""
>- - -
IX u...
-< U..l </l
::J ::J
Z </l 00 100
-< ~ u... - -
-,
~
0 0
u...
'" .....l Vl
CI'
CI' -<
- z '0
c.:: G:
U..l u...
CO ~
~
U..l 0
U 0
U..l u...
0 (/)
. U..l
>- ::J ~
.....l </l 'J:>
::J ~ u... - -
-, ~
Vi
.....l
en -<
en ~ 0 f-
0
f- :x: ...... f-
</l ~
U..l </l
0 </l
f- U..l f-
U U..l Z c.::
U..l ><: r;)
-, U..l U..l
0 ::J f-
c.:: </l co c.::Z
.....l IX
0... .....l >- ot; U..l
::c -< Z >- :x:
~ -< f-
-< U..l 0
f- 0 ~ .....l
Z -< .....l 0
~ t-:o (/)
0 </lc.:: ~
ell co .....l f-
0...
-< :::
~
"" co
"" AiIIIIlo.
IV
:J
CI' c:
m
""" ....,
""
"""
'"
'J:>
Vi
U..l
0
"" ~
"" U..l
>
-<
.....l
-<
::J
~
-<
00
'J:>
~
""
o
'J:>
</l
.....l
-<
f-
o
f-
~
::J
</l
~
Il)
~I
!l:
o
lL.
Cl
;;:;
""'"
""
9
<
-."> I fl'
/,
SERIES 8 REGIONAL GROWTH FORECAST
Site Specific Projects
Chula Vista City/Sphere
Project Phasing
Project Name Total Units 1990-2000 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015
SF MF SF MF SF MF SF MF SF MF
Sphere
Brehm Terra Nova -- 230 - 230 - - - - - -
EastLake Greens (+ Amend.) 1,676 1,516 1,363 1,516 313 - - - -- -
IEastLake II Trails 793 467 158 77 396 234 239 156 - -
; EastLake Woods 675 - - - 295 - 169 - 211 --
EastLake Vistas 308 784 - - 77 196 135 343 96 245
Rancho San Miguel 1,618 - 400 - 609 - 609 - - -
Rancho Del Rey I & II 1,348 392 1,348 392 - - - - - --
Rancho Del Rey III 585 795 146 198 292 398 147 199 -- -
Salt Creek I 166 440 166 440 -- - - - -- --
Salt Creek Ranch 2,100 509 525 127 525 127 525 127 525 128
Sunbow II 1,128 818 282 204 282 204 282 205 282 205
Telegraph Canyon Estates 348 -- 348 - - - - -- -- -
Woodcrest Southwestern 54 - 54 - - - - - -- -
Wood crest Terra Nova 85 - 85 - -- -- - -- -- --
Evergreen Gardens 45 - 45 - - - - - -- -
Subtotal 10,929 5,951 4,920 3,184 2,789 1,159 2,106 1,030 1,114 578
Western C.V. In-fill.. 500 1,500 125 375 125 375 125 375 125 375
pnere Total 11,429 7,451 0;045 3,559 2,914 1,534 2,231 1,405 1,239 953
I ANNUAL AVE. TOT. UNITS: 860.4 889.6 727.2 438.4
Otay Ranch
Otay Valley Parcel
Proctor Valley Parcel
San Ysidro Parcel
8,716
3,003
812
9,394
1,558
1,800
1,000
3,174
300
2,500
103
2,640
1,300
53
2,276
547
800
1,213
313
1,300
500
710
Footnote:
* _ 100 units per year assumed from 1995 thru 2015.
(:lsphere2.wb1)
10-Mar-95
. "I
'"
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
/J/.//' A " j; r--..,?-,
PUBUCHEARlNGDATE: , /' ~/ot5/lC; (~/) -.-5~
SUBJECT.' ~~ ~i::: rC:;;;;;/~/7PC~
LOCATION: \7:.?Z ~ ~~~_,_ ~~..e
st:ST~::~~~t:1::~~-:::- ~
PUBLICATION DATE 11 ~//J~'
/ /
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS NO. MAILED
PER GC ~54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK y); P /;7 j
/ /
COPIES TO:
Planning
/
/
Administration (4)
~
Originating Department
Engineering
Others
~
/ J;0~h~~
(/
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
7/93
-55-
ClaN' dHS)\A\. -JJ\~6-::)OWO)
.pa.l!cdw! ~u!.Ieaq aql .I0J alqcncAc S! a;)!A.las AClaH c!ll.loJ!lc::>
.SS9S-S8S (619)(<I<U) Jeaa aql .I0J sa;)!Aaa SUOnC;)!llnwwo;)ala.L .10 ItOS-169 (619) lC uoncw.loJU!
;)!Jpads .IoJ :If.lal::> An::> aql PClUO;) ascald .saY!'IY:JV puv sa:J]iUaS palnpal{:Js ./01 slvp allY puc s3uyaam
./01 a:Juvllpv U] s./nol{ 11{3]<1-4L0l lscal lC uonCPOWWO;);)C q;)ns lsanba.l a;)!A.las .10 'Al!A!PC '~unaaw
An::> C U! alcdp!l.Icd .Io/puc 'puanc 'ssa;);)C Ol uonCPOWWO;);)C Icpads a.l!"ba.l oqA\. SICnp!A!pU!
slsanba.l '(yay) PV sa!l!nqcS!a ql!M. SUC;)!.Iawv aql ql!A\. ~U!Aldwo;) U! 'ClS!A cl"q::> JO Al!::> aq.L
.L::>v SID:.LI'lUlVSm HUM. SNV::>IH3WV HUM. 3::>NVI'ldWO::>
ZO-96-WJd
9661 '01 l~ldV
:ON tISVJ
:atIlVa
"lEgddE AEm P1Egl{
gq OlllUp~Sgp UOSlgd AUE g~ll{:)~l{M.lE 'gnUgAV Ipmod 9LZ 'llu~Pl!ns: HEH Al~J 'moo~ g:)UglgJUOJ
l!:)unoJ gIp u~ 'W'O Of:9 l8 9661 "SZ I!.IOV "A8pS.InqJ., uo JOWD aNY 'NOISSIWWOJ
DNINNVld '1IJNflOJ AlIJ tIHl AS: altIH tIs: 111M DNIltItIW dOHS)I~OM JnS:fld alvs
"llupggm
:)~Jqnd p~ES Ol 10pd 10 lE )[lgD Al~J gIp Ol pglgAngp g:)ugpuodsgno:) UgnpM. u~ 10 'g:)pou s~Ip u~
pgqP:)Sgp llupggm :)~lqnd gIplE pgS~El gSlg guogmos 10 nOA sgnSS~ gSOIp AlUO llU~S~El Ol pgl~~l gq
AEm nOA 'lmo:) u~ SUO~lEPUgruruO:)gl Sl~ PUE l10dgl gIp UO UOP:)E S,Al~J gIp gllUgHEl{:) Oll{S~M. nOA 11
"g:)~lOU S~Ip U~ pgq~:)gds glEP llupggm gIp Ol1O~ld 10 uo )[lgD Al~J
gIp JO g:)~JJO gIp U~ pgA~g:)gl gq lsnm l!:)unoJ Al~J gIp Ol pgn~mqns gq Ol SUop~lgd AUV "lUgUlllEdga
ll~Eld Al~J gIp JO g:)mo gIp u~ gm uo glE llodg~ lEnuuv ~661 s,JOWD gIp JO sg~doJ
" Apms
llU~UUEld PUE Almq~SEgJ E SE SgUngp~nll VOtIJ glms gIp JO Z9Z~1 uop:)gs 19pUn M.g~AgllmUglliU01~AUg
mOlJ ldmgxg s~ llodgl gIp lEIp pg~mlglgp SEll 1OlEUW100J M.g~Ag~ ImUglliU01~AUtI s, Al~J gl{l
"g:)uEndmo:) llU~n~lUO:) gmSug OllO/pUE 'Sg~:)Ugp~PP pgqpUgp~ Apgmgl Ol
A1ESSg:)gU pgMngq SUO~PE AUE UO l!:)unoJ Al~J gIp Ol SUOPEPUgruruO:)gl pglElgl Sg)[Em PUE 'splEpUmS
gIp JO l{:)Eg Ip~M. g:)uEndmo:) ~ s~ Al~J gIplOU 10 19Ipgl{M. AJ~lUgp~ Ol SgAlgS llodgl ;:}l{l "SplEpUms
PIOl{S;:}ll{l ;:}Ip Aq P;:}l;:}AO:) S:)~dOl ;:}:)~Al;:}S PUE Aln~:)EJ UgA;:}l;:} ;:}Ip JO l{:)E;:} uo IpM.Olll JO sPEd~
;:}Ipll~plEll;:}l S;:}PUgllE lEUl;:}lX;:} PUE SlU;:}UlllEd;:}a Al~J sno~lEA Aq P;:}lU;:}S;:}ld uO~lEmloJu~ JO S~SAIEUE
JO ;:}mo:)lno ;:}Ip Sp;:}g;:}l PUE 'JOWD ;:}Ip Aq AHEnuuE pg:)npOld s~ llod;:}l P;:}lOU ;:}l{l "SplEpUms
PIOl{S;:}ll{l ;:}In-JO-AlnEnb S,Al~J ;:}Ip Ip~M. g:)uEndmo:) uo SUOpEpU;:}ruruO:)gl PUE llOd;:}~ lEnuuv
~661 s,JOWD ;:}Ip JO UOpEl;:}p~SUO:) PUE M.;:}~A;:}l s,uo~ss~ruruoJ ll~UUEld PUE s,lpunoJ Al~J gIp
JO ;:}sodmd ;:}Ip1OJ E~UlOJnEJ 'mS~A Elnl{J JO Al~J ;:}Ip dO (JOWD) NOISSIWWOJ lHDIS~tIAO
lNtIWtIDVNVW HlMO~D aNY 'NOISSIWWOJ DNINNVld '1IJNflOJ AlIJ tIHl
AS: G'ltIH tiS: 'l'lIM DNIltItIW dOHS)I~OM JnS:fld V l VHl NtIAID As:~tIH SI tIJIlON
VIN~OdnVJ 'V lSIA VlflHJ dO
NOISSIWWOJ lHDIS~tIAO lNtIWtlDVNVW HlMO~D
aNY NOISSIWWOJ DNINNV'ld
''lIJNflOJ AlIJ tIHl dO
dOHS)ffiOM/DNIltltlW JnS:fld lNIOf 'lVIJtIdS V dO tIJIlON