Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/07/13 Tuesday, July 13, 1993 6:00 p.m. "I deClare under penalty of perJury that I am employed by the C1ty of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at the Public S r 'ces Building and at City Hall on Council Chambers DATED. 7 . SIGNED C -. 'Public Services Building lar Meeti ~ncil Re CAlL TO ORDER 1. ROIl. CAlL: Councilmembers Fox _' Horton _' Moore _, Rindone _' and Mayor Nader _ 2. PLEDGE OF AIJ.EGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MlNUfES: June 3,1993 (Special Worksession/Meeting of the City Council); June IS, 1993 (City Council Meeting); June 22,1993 (City Council Meeting); and June 22, 1993 (Special Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency) 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Oath of Office: Ricardo Jimenez - Human Relations Commission. b. Proclaiming the month of July as "Parks and Recreation Month" - The proclamation will be presented by Mayor Nader to Bob Lind, Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission. c. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to students from lrapuato, Mexico - Certificates will be presented by Mayor Nader to Guadalupe Navarro Miranda, M. Patricia Rodriguez Tellez-Giron, Elizabeth Velasco Cruz, Vanesa Julietta Merino Reyes, Luz Angelica Gonzalez Segovia, and Francisco Hernandes Delgado. d. Acknowledgement of "Best Recycling Partnership Award" - The City received the award from the County of San Diego in recognition of their leadership in coordinating public, private, and non-profit partnerships to promote recycling. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 15) The staff recommendntions regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calmdm will be enacml by the Council by one motion wUhout discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the publU: or CiJy staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please [IiI out a "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the CiJy Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendntion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendntion.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendnr will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the publU: will be the first items of business. 5. WRlTfEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter of resignation from the Resource Conservation Commission - Maureen McNair, 948 Monterey Court, Chula Vista, CA 91911. It is recommended that the resignation be accepted and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. b. Letter of resignation from the Parks and Recreation Commission - Clifford Roland, HOO Industrial Blvd., 1-6, Chula Vista, CA 91911. It is recommended that the resignation be accepted and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library. Agenda -2- July 13, 1993 c. Letter requesting insurance requirements for cab companies be reduced to the same level as the Metropolitan Transit Development Board - O.D. Hedrick, President, Red Cab Company of San Diego, P.O. Box 437240, San Ysidro, CA 92143. It is recommended that this issue be considered when the report on taxicab operations comes back to Council in August. d. Letter requesting waiver of assessments and fees - Bill Armstrong, Pastor, EastLake Community Church, 1519 Via Hacienda, Chula Vista, CA 91913. Due to the significant staff work and meetings involved in coordinating this request, it is recommended that the letter be referred to staff. e. Letter requesting Council defer any action on the Multi-Species ConsetVation Program (MSCP) Resolution of Intention - James E. Whalen, Chairman, Alliance for Habitat Conservation, 416 University Avenue, Suite 200, San Diego, CA 92103. Staff concurs with the Alliance request for a public hearing on this matter and recommends scheduling such a hearing in the next four to six weeks. 6. ORDINANCE 2561 REQillRlNG RECOVERY OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATION FEES IMPOSED BY SAN DIEGO COUNTY (first readinR:) - Commencing 7/1192, under the auspices of a new State law, the County has imposed a booking fee of $176 per criminal defendant arrested by our police department. While we are protesting the amount of the fee and the authority to impose same in pending litigation, adoption of the ordinance would create a means of collecting it from criminal defendants booked through the system during the pendency of the litigation if it eventually proves unsuccessful, and would therefore protect our general fund from a possible large unaccrued liability. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading and approve the resolution. (City Attorney) RESOLUTION 17167 APPROPRIATING AN ADDmONAL $3,855 FOR TIiE CONTINUATION OF TIiE BOOKING FEES UTIGATION - 4/5th's vote required. 7. RESOLUTION 17156 APPROVING AN ElITENSION OF TIiE AGREEMENT WITH REMY AND THOMAS FOR LEGAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR TIiE OTAY RANCH PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING TIiE MAYOR TO EXEClITE SAID AGREEMENT - The agreement extension will provide continuing assistance in reviewing the Otay Ranch ErR including the CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding Consideration, Mitigation Monitoring Program, and the staff report. Also, will provide continuation of meetings with staff and coordination with Board of Supervisors/City Council on legal issues. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) 8. RESOLUTION 17157 AUTHORIZING TIiE TEMPORARY USE OF LEGISLATIVE OFFICE FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT USAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION TIiEREFOR - Pursuant to prior Council authorization, the expansion of the City Attorney's office construction is about to be let out for public bid. During the construction period, it will be more safe and conducive to the conduct of business if the City Attorney's office and staff, or part of them, could relocate on an interim basis. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City Attorney) 4/5th's vote required. Agenda -3- July 13, 1993 9. RESOLtJI10N 17158 APPROVING TI-IE FIRSfEXfENSION AGREEMENfFOR TI-IE COMMIJNIlY YOUlH CENTER OPERATING AGREEMENf - On 3/12/92, the City entered into a joint use agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District and the Boys and Girls Club for the operation and maintenance of the Community Youth Center on "L" Street. A section of the agreement stipulates that the City will review the operations of the Boys and Girls Club periodically, and that the City shall extend the term of the agreement if the Club is providing appropriate services and support during their operating hours at the Center. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation) 10. RESOLtJI10N 17159 RESCINDING RESOLtJI10N 15323 AUlHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERlY WITIi RANCHO DEL SUR PARTNERSHIP - On 9/26/89, Council approved an exchange of open space property with the Rancho del Sur Partnership to facilitate the development of medical offices on Telegraph Canyon Road in the Sunbow I development. The Partnership and a medical doctor are jointly designing a medical center building on a triangular parcel of property along Telegraph Canyon Road. The property from the Open Space District is required to meet a condition of parking from the Planning Department. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation and Director of Public Works) 11. RESOLtJI10N 17160 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "LIBRARY PARKING WT OVERLAY" - On 6/9/93, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Libraty Parking Lot Overlay" (LB-126). The work to be done consists of providing asphalt concrete material overlaying the existing parking lot at the Chula Vista Library located at 361 "F" Street. The work also includes the removal of alligatored pavement areas and replacement with asphalt concrete, restriping of the parking lot, adjustment of water meter boxes, and replacement of existing roof drains. The low bidder was Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. in the amount of $32,726. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 12. RESOLtJI10N 17161 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR TI-IE CONSTRUCTION OF ORANGE AVENUE AND FOURTH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS (ST-151) - On 6/23/93, sealed bids were received for the "Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue Street Improvements" (ST-ISl). The work to be done consists of the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, pavement widening, decorated and landscaped medians, and traffic safety improvements. The low bidder was Granite Construction Company in the amount of $333,968. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 13. RESOLtJI10N 17162 APPROVING AGREEMENT BE1WEEN TI-IE SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION (SDTC) AND TI-IE CIlY FOR UNIFIED TELEPHONE INFORMATION SYSTEM - On 6/19/80, the South Coast Organization Operating Transit (SCOOT) entered into an agreement with San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC) for regional transit information service. The service provides Chula Vista Transit (CVT) riders with information on CVT schedules and routes, and on other fixed route transit systems in San Diego County including San Diego Transit and the Trolley. Since SCOOT was dissolved on 711193, the agreement for the service for the current fiscal year will be between the City and SDTC. The agreement continues CVT participation in the regional service for Fiscal Year (FY) 1993/94 at a cost of $22,766, a 7.6% increase over the FY 1992/93 cost of $21,146. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) Agenda -4- July 13, 1993 14. REPORT PROPOSED DEBT SETl1.EMENT BElWEEN OGDEN ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY SERVICES AND BALDWINVISTAASSOClATES REGARDING THE OTAY RANCH - Over the past few months, Baldwin has fallen short in meeting its contractual obligation to Ogden Environmental as to payments due. Negotiations have been ongoing over the last thirty days to arrive at an acceptable payment schedule to eliminate the debt. A tentative agreement has been reached. The purpose bf the report is to request Council authorization, since the City is a party to the three party agreement, to have City staff implement the agreement. It is recommended that Council authorize staff to execute a payment agreement with Baldwin Vista and Ogden Environmental to address the Otay Ranch debt. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) 15. REPORT UPDATE ON STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND IMPAcrs OF AB 408 CDECRIMINAlJZATION OF PARKING VIOLATIONS) - AB 408 became effective 7/1/93. The report describes the steps taken to comply with AB 408 provisions and the specific impacts on the City's parking citation program. ITEM HAS BEEN PULLED AT STAFFS REQUEST AND SUBMITTED TO COUNCIL AS AN INFORMATION ITEM. (Director of Finance) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as publii; hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fiO out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City C1erlc prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recotnl7ll!lllifJtion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendJltion.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. 16. PUBJJC HEARING AMENDING THE 1993/94 BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR REVENUE REDUCTIONS FROM THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA - On 6/15/93, Council adopted the 1993/94 operating budget with the understanding that the budget would be revisited after the State adopted its budget and the impact of the State revenue cuts on the City were known. Staff recommends adoption of the revised budget. (Administration) RESOLUTION 17163 AMENDING THE 1993/94 BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR REVENUE REDUCTIONS FROM THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA CONSIDERATION OF AN INCREASE IN SEWER SERVICE CHARGES - As a member of the San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD), the City is required to participate in its operations, maintenance, and upgrade program. Due to the increased cost of upgrading regional wastewater transportation, treatment, and disposal, it is necessary to raise the sewer service charges for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required. 17. PUBJJC HEARING RESOLUTION 17164 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE ON SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND TRANSFER OF $1,856,000 FROM FUND 222 TO FUND 225 Agenda 18. PUBUC HEARING 19. PUBIJC HEARING 20. PUBIJC HEARING ORDINANCE 2562 21. PUBIJC HEARING -5- July 13, 1993 O'lY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICI 10 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 - Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, the public hearing for Open Space Maintenance District 10 has been separated due to conflict of interest. In accordance with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the Open Space Districts. The reports were accepted, and the required public hearings were set by Council at their meetings of 5/25/93 and 6/1/93. Staff recommends Council open the public hearing, take testimony, and continue the pubic hearing to the meeting of 7/20/93. (Director of Public Works) CIlY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICf NUMBERS 1-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 24, 26, AND BAY BOULEVARD, EASTLAKE AND TOWN CENTER MAINTENANCE DISTRICIS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993/94 - Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, the public hearing for Open Space Maintenance District 10 has been separated due to conflict of interest. In accordance with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the Open Space Districts. The reports were accepted, and the required public hearings were set by Council at their meetings of 5/25/93 and 6/1193. Staff recommends Council open the public hearing, take testimony, and continue the pubic hearing to the meeting of 7/20/93. (Director of Public Works) CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FORMUL TI-FAMILYRECYCUNG COllECTION SERVICES- On 6/22/93, Council approved a resolution giving notice of intent to grant a franchise for the multi-family recycling program collection services to be provided by Laidlaw Waste Systems and setting 7/13/93 as the date for the public hearing. As directed, staff has noticed the public hearing in conformance with the Charter required process for granting a franchise. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Administration) GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FOR MULTI-FAMILY RECYCUNG COllECTION SERVICES (first readinl!:) CONDmONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-39; REQUEST TO ESTABIJSHSHORT- TERM TRANSmONAL HOUSING FOR HOMELESS FAMIIJES UP TO FOR'lY-FOUR PEOPLE AT 31 FOURTH AVENUE - SOUTH BAY COMMUNl'lY SERVICES - South Bay Community Services is proposing to establish a short-term transitional housing project for homeless families for a maximum of forty-four tenants in family groups and one resident manager at an existing apartment complex located at 31 Fourth Avenue. The complex consists of twelve one-bedroom units and two two-bedroom units. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning) RESOLUTION 17165 APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-39, A REQUEST TO ESTABUSH A SHORT-TERM, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROJECI AT 31 FOURTH AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICI ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject moJtU within the Council's jurisdiction that is not an ikm on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Couru;i/ from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subjec~ please compleu the yeUow "Request to Speak Under Oral Comnwnk:ations Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and foUow up action. Your time is limited to three minutu per speaker. Agenda -6- July 13, 1993 BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is the tinII! the CiJy Council will consider items which IuJve been forwarrWl to them for consideraJion by one of the ciIy's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees. 22. Request by the Housing Advisory Committee that Council negotiate for at least 200 existing rental assistance certificates being administered by the San Diego County Housing Authority - Joe Casillas, Chairman, Housing Advisory Committee. ACTION ITEMS The items 1isted in this section of the agenda are expected to etiJ;a substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the general publU:. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recomnJJ!1lJiation may in certain cases be presented in the akemative. Those who wish to speok, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit a to the CiIy Clerk prior to the meeting. PubtiJ; comments are limited to five minutes. 23.A. REPORT UPDATE ON SOUD WASTE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND ALTERNATIVE DISPOSAL OPTIONS - At the first meeting of the newly formed Solid Waste Interim Commission, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend to their respective Councils and the Board of Supervisors that the deadline for approving the Solid Waste Participation Agreement be extended (by amendment) to 7/23/93. The report provides updated information regarding regional solid waste activities and alternative disposal options, and presents the Interim Agreement and the amendment for Council's reconsideration. Staff recommends Council accept the report and approve the resolution. (City Manager) B. RESOLUTION 17166 APPROVING AGREEMENT (AS AMENDED) BY, BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITIES OF THE COUNTY ESTABUSHING AN INTERIM SOUD WASTE COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SOUD WASTE, AND COMMITTING FIFTY PERCENT OF THE CITY'S WASTESTREAM TO THE COUNTY ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the tinII! the CiIy Council will discuss items whU:h IuJve been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the pubtiJ; will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. PubtiJ; comments are limited to five minutes per individual OTHER BUSINESS 24. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) a. Scheduling of meetings. Agenda -7- July 13, 1993 25. MAYOR'S REPORTfS) a. Ratification of appointments: Louis Alvarez - International Friendship Commission; and Sheila Washington - Economic Development Commission Ex-Officio. b. Reconsideration of 1993/94 budget. c. Cox Cable adult channel. 26. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Fox a. Review of Police Department policy regarding minor narcotic law violations on school campuses. Continued from the meeting of 61'l:2/93. Councilman Moore b. Reconsideration of Solid Waste Management Agreement and eligibility to serve on Interim Commission by listing areas of concern as understandings versus conditions and that the various City's items of understanding to be among the first order of business of the Commission. c. Letters to Mayors of Imperial Beach, National City, and City of San Diego regarding Eighth Disttict area and County Board of Supervisors regarding First District south of SR-54 urging them to join Chula Vista in a unified effort regarding a basic divergence program and a follow-up meeting with Presiding Juvenile Judge Pate, Probation Department, and District Attorney's Office. Goal is to agree upon a minimum offerl court fine of thirty days of community service with parent presence for fifty per cent of the service when youths are apprehended in acts of graffiti application. Councilman Rindone d. Evaluation criteria for City Manager and format. ADJOURNMENT The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss: Instructions to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - ChuIa Vista Employees Association (CVEA) , Western Council of Engineers (WCE) , Police Officers Association (POA) , International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF) , Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. Continued from the meeting of 61'l:2/93. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - EPA vs. the City of San Diego, Chula Vista amicus party discussion, instructions to attorneys. Continued from the meeting of 61'l:2/93. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - [gou vs. the City of Chula Vista. (For update report, if any.) Continued from the meeting of 61'l:2/93. Agenda -8- July 13, 1993 Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. Aptec No. 2. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. County of San Diego regarding tipping fee surcharge. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Institution of litigation against County of San Diego regarding Daley Rock Quarry CUP. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. County of San Diego regarding booking fees. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Jones Intercable. Appointment of Department Head pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. Evaluation of City Manager pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on July 20, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Special Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ltem~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Proclamation: Proclaiming the month of July as, "Parks and Recreation Month" Director of Parks and Recreatioa<- SUBMITTED BY: Many local agencies throughout California historically proclaim July as Parks and Recreation Month, to bring awareness of the value our parks and recreational opportunities give to all residents of the community. The Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Department is offering a wide variety of programs for all ages. Community Day Camp with a different "Theme" each session, as well as specialty camps such as various sports camps and theater camps, will run throughout the summer. In addition, classes and recreational programming at Centers, playgrounds and pools will be offered throughout the Summer, as well as Senior programming and sports leagues. The Music in the Park Concert Series, held in Memorial Bowl will feature a different type of music each Sunday in July, and the Annual Fourth of July Fireworks Extravaganza will be staged at the Chula Vista Bayfront. The proclamation declaring the month of July 1993 as "PARKS AND RECREATION MONTH" will be presented by Mayor Tim Nader to Bob Lind, Chair of the Chula Vista Parks & Recreation Commission. 'Ib -- / COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item -Yc Meeting Date 07/13/93 ITEM TITLE Student Recognition SUBMITTED BY International Friendship Commission (4/5ths Vote: Yes No~) Mayor Nader to present each of the following students from Irapuato, Mexico with certificates of recognition. The students are part of the Sister Cities International U. S. /Mexico Kellogg Youth Exchange Program. Guadalupe Navarro Miranda M. Patricia Rodriguez Telllez-Giron Elizabeth Velasco Cruz Vanesa Julietta Merino Reyes Luz Angelica Gonzalez Segovia Francisco Hernandes Delgado '1c-J COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date ITEM TITLE: Presentation of the Best Recycling Partnership Award SUBMITTED BY: Conservation Coordinator .~ City Manager & 1~ yJ A~ REVIEWED BY: In recognition of the City of Chula Vista's leadership in coordinating public, private and nonprofit partnerships to promote recycling, the County of San Diego has presented Chula Vista with the "Best Recycling Partnership" award. Attachment A is the award description. City staff would like to present the award to City Council and offer congratulations to City employees for their recycling efforts which have kept over 90 tons of recyclables from the landfill, as well as to the many businesses that are working to better our environment and community through recycling. ~~J City of Chula Vista Best Recycling Partnership We recycle with a lot of help from our friends! The City of Chula Vista has been a leader in coordinating public, private and non-profit partnerships to promote recycling. Their "Recycling at Work" program is a good example. First, in 1991, the City's own trash cans were put on a diet to model good office recycling practices. To help create jobs for urban youth, City buildings were serviced by the Urban Corps under a $15,000 County TAP grant. Collections to date total 75 tons of recyclables. Using that experience, the City staff took recycling to Chula Vista's businesses with their Outreach proj ect, which provides recycling consulting service to businesses setting up their own programs. Using a survey of businesses, attractive literature, workshops, and many individual visits, City staff has trained employees in more than 80 buildings to recycle. A workshop for the hospitality industry brought in over 50 Chula Vista restaurant and hotel managers to discuss their special recycling needs, procurement of recycled content products and hazardous waste disposal. With a $50,000 County TAP grant, Laidlaw Waste Systems will assist Chula Vista to continue its commercial education program. Chula Vista is developing a computerized regional waste exchange database, to be linked to the State's CALMAX waste exchange program. And, since businesses come and go, the commercial program data base is linked with the City's business license permit database to track participation. The City also hosted a construction and demolition "roundtable" for City and County businesses preparing to meet the requirements of the County's mandates for those waste materials. Already honored by the State Department of Conservation, Chula Vista's "Recycling At Work Outreach Project" is now proudly recognized here at home by San Diego County as a model of partnership planning for recycling program implementation. .. If of ., ;2., r'--'~"'" i('''~ ;! ~"i RECEIVED I' ' !~uL' J'.'! 16 '3~1 [2ii---'~-- .-J Co. t r ~ "...; G'; __ _;.;.:.':..5 I '93 ~ 17 AlO ~5 CITY OF CHUL A VIS 1 A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE June 11, 1993 The Honorable Tim Nader Mayor of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader, Thank-you for the opportunity to serve as a member of the City Resource Conservation Commission. Unfortunately, 1 must tender my resignation at this time. As you may recall, 1 am completing a master's degree program. 1 have a required class which conflicts with the RCC meetings. 1 thought it would be best if 1 resigned and freed a seat for another community member who would be able to attend regularly. Sincerely, 1~~G'/11~~ Maureen McNair cc: Resource Conservation Commission cc, t!fi Cj) C1 (~J WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS r 7);:PJ ~ - !Ja.. -I ^'- : ~ i. " c. '11 :. r-l. J~ . ." ~ k) :Tn '", " . '93 .... 23 P12 :35 (J ~ L~~..-u-ee~ CITY OF CHULA VISTA C -- . ~ (l /J' CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 'fl~;;J:;Yv ~LT I( ~~ · 'LJA~;ltY 7- ~~ ~ ~ ,~L'~~ ;tf;- f~' CJW.- Q14t..-- ad'~ ~/ynLJ-e-t./ +j ~ t/~~T f1c~JK/ {2~~~ :t-kjAYl~/ .f) a~ ~7 C4d' 1f;LI!~ rzJ ~:iL. . 1~~~11 /'1'1'.3 RECEIVED ~rh~ I /!A', 1.- , - ' . t.L .' ~c:Z. ~... :+ 12 ~byVI./Y72<~~~ cc: ~',' ~r-(L() az;!:; :7 WRITtEN COMMUNICATIONS &~ ~J/v \ - . '.J _, 5/:;-1 a::'\.'!j1:lQ (D Sl'-: (S IlL & I' . ' . ", ',': Y18 " Y , ' . .. _~..J y~_.~ (, /9 S?~ECEIVED V '93 .III 28 litO ~7 "--/Yl d-A-ftrv ~/i~ 'h cL"LLi/ L . CITY OF CHULA ViSTA d . . . CITY CLERK'S OFFICE C-]) ~uz-.fi- ~1A-';j ~L~~~ ..J) ~-L-una/U- :bY zf-~~ CLd 4'A'L- ,:~+-<?~ '-r.vz.~./ ~ ~ PaLft -f- td-0LQa:tA-D~v (f~~~ /~r;!,~~ ~~d aJ:I.~ j) ~ . lA-a~#' ~ ~ (j~ 'l/,c<4~07 /J) ~Q. (3f~ ~~J r'?- ./ '/fr'~ ~~&: /IO,p.-I-~ J2-ncLU~ 6~ ~2--':E~ tA-L~~-; cZe/ 9/9/( .5b ,~ 03V'1:nQ \~ OCl 8~ IU. ~ " ;,: ~O YTlJ .!;',: 1 (. ;;';'ri3.JJ YTlJ . -... _.~ -~-... -- .... -- --.- ,.. --.~.._.. ~ - _.. ~-.- _ _ __ CommunitY Church RECEIVED '93 .u 23 P4 :22 1519 Vi,l Hacienda, Chula Vista, CA 91913 June 23, 1993 CITY OF CHULA VISl A CITY CLERK'S OFFICE 6194826772 The Honorable Mayor Tim Nader City Hall 276 Fourth A venue Chula Vista, CA 91910 6194828472 Dear Mayor Tim Nader: It's a pleasure to write you with greetings from the EastLake Community Church. We are happy to inform you of the progressive growth of our new congregation and once again thank you for personally helping to launch our public ministry January 24. Recently we were able to close escrow on our three-acre land site in EastLake (APN 595-232-12 and 13), and we are very excited about being able to someday construct our multi-purpose facility on that site. We are discovering that many doors of opportunity for ministry and service to our community are being opened for us, especially with the youth. This will be enhanced greatly when our facility is complete and we are able to be readily available seven days a week. One of our obvious concerns is the financial burden of constituting and maintaining such a facility along with the many assessment and permit fees that are required. For this reason we would like to request the City Council consider waiving the Public Improvement Bonds Fund Assessment (85-2) as well as the Assessment (88-1) Fund. In addition to the assessments, we have been told that we should anticipate a Building Permit Fee of around $125,000. As you can see, there are very costly expenses that are impeding our ability to go ahead with construction. "Living From The Inside Out" We do feel our request is valid, especially because of verbal commitments made to us by the city at the time of purchase of our old Chula Vista Missionary Church property on Orange Avenue. We were assured that the city would not only assist us in finding new land to purchase, but also in the waiving of assessments and fees to enable us to reconstruct our church facility. @" co"" c" ,...... . !\tran looks ::):::~:,t~~:lr~c"fJ' ~ (LJ) WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS buttheLord . ~ ?! look>at the heart. fl{,~4;' 0;, p~ r 'lJ-Y'JJ """,," 4~?t4T gj ~~ 5~-/ We would ask that our request be placed on the council agenda in the near future. We feel we have a unique opportunity to provide valuable service to the youth and families in our community. We have established an excellent relationship with the EastLake High School and feel our permanent facility will serve as a youth center, especially for the many "latch-key" students who have no place to go after school. We are also looking forward to a weekly program being established for the many "senior adults" of our neighborhoods. Our facility will also serve as a center for such a program. There are just a few reasons why we are eager to begin construction but find it necessary to ask for waiver of some of the fees. Again, if I could meet with you personally to further explain our request, I would appreciate the opportunity. Thank you so much for your continued support of our new church. I will await your response. Gratefully, (jJJj~ Bill Armstrong Pastor WFA/lm 5c1"'~ ALLIANCE FOR HABITAT CONSERVATION 41 6 University Avenue, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92103 [619) 296-4394 ^~-,~....~ June 28, 1993 The Honorable Tim Nader Mayor City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Re: Clean Water Program Resolution of Intention (ROI) Dear Mayor Nader: When Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt announced listing the California gnatcatcher as a threatened species, he counseled against what he termed the "train wreck" that the spotted owl had brought to the Pacific Northwest. Unfortunately, the San Diego region is in danger of a "wreck" of potentially far greater magnitude because of the unbalanced Multi-Species Conservation Program (MSCP), a significant aspect of which wlll be coming before your City Council in the near future. The purpose of this letter is to request that your City Council defer any action on the MSCP Resolution of Intention (ROI). The Alllance recommends that all member Jurisdictions in the Clean Water Program hold a full public workshop to hear the broad implications of this program. This is needed so that the significant implications of the ROI can be exposed to an extensive public hearing process as soon as possible. It is imperative that the general public -- those thousands of property owners whose land wlll be targeted for preservation, with no future development options, and those hundreds of thousands who will have to pay a significant share of the costs of it -- be exposed to it now, and that the Council better understand the full implications of this highly complex program. To date, the Clean Water Program staff from the City of San Diego have presented an amazingly positive and simplistic overview of the MSCP Program, but they have failed to alert you to the program's more serious Implications: . Potentially convulsive changes to your City's entire Community and Specific Plan framework. ~'C.' WRItTEN COMMUNICATIONS SerJ frz- ?O,yV June 28, 1993 Page 2 . A potential acquisition cost of mllllons for each member jurisdiction. . The threat of a tidal wave of "taking" lawsuits, should land owners not be adequately compensated if their land is needed for the preserve system. . Forcing a significant amount of future growth into existing neighborhoods, with foreseeable community furor. . . Forcing additiona~ growth into existing prime agriculture areas, causing leapfrog development. As presently devised, the MSCP is an extraordinarily complex scheme, so far based entirely on narrowly focused biologic considerations. The MSCP has considered economic and land use implications only in terms of proposing to acquire most of the needed land through exactions, and even now threatens to ignore economic reality as it rolls toward completion. Before action is taken on the ROI, the following impacts should be considered. These only begin to reveal the compiexity of this Issue. 1. Narrow Biolollic Focus. The Multi-Species Conservation Program is driven solely by biologic considerations. No one argues that a sound biological basis is necessary or Federal permits will not be Issued. The problem Is that all other elements, including economic, land use and social factors are either Ignored or minimized. The MSCP has produced onerous maps and "Standards and Guidelines" that Imply enormous changes In land use policy without benefit of any public or Council review. As a consequence, your Council will be forced to give priority to the Clean Water Program over all other criteria when making land use decisions. This is a priority with which you should be comfortable. 2. Maps. The MSCP Habitat Evaluation Maps classify approximately 125,000 acres as Very High Quality habitat. Clean Water Program consultants have recommended that all 125,000 acres be permanently preserved. 3. Land Use. Implementation of the MSCP will require major changes to the City's existing General, Community and Specific Plan programs at a probable cost of many millions of dollars over a decade or more. How will land use decisions be carried out in the meantime? .".. S e-;;... June 28, 1993 Page 3 4. Economic Disruption. Despite assurances to the contrary, both San Diego City and County staff have used draft (unrevlewed and unadapted) MSCP dacumerits for cammentlng on current projects. The uncertainty that this has caused, as well as delay during a time of deep recession, already has had significant negative econamic impacts. 5. Impact on City Budllet. Adaptlon .of the ROI and Implementatian .of the MSCP will commit member Jurisdictions to a significant on-going annual expense to manage the program. Prior to any action on the ROI, we believe that all jurisdictions should knaw the fiscal budget impacts .of the MSCP pragram. There has been recent mavement an the part .of MSCP staff to determine haw much .of preserve system the regian can afford. We applaud these efforts, albeit late in the process. However, staff needs to hear your opinians. Despite these serious Issues, I must assure yau that the Alliance supports withaut equivacatian the establishment .of an ecasystem- based wildlife preserve system, encampassing coastal sage scrub, wetlands, riparian, and with adequate funding, ather mare abundant habitats characteristic .of San Dlega Caunty's unique biadiverslty. We cannat let this pragram fail despite the gravity .of the program impacts listed abave because our members' development activities are in moratarlum until the preserve system .or an equivalent is appraved by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. In summary, I urge yau to avoid the potential "train wreck" that actian an the ROI wauld bring at this time. Please hald full noticed public hearings an the propased Resalutian .of Intention befare any final action is taken ta commit your City's taxpayers to this potentially disastrous pragram. cc: Karen Scarborough Susan Hamilton - ..!?e,3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item (p Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: d . .;J..b~ I .. f .. Or 1nance Requ1r1ng Recovery 0 Cr1m1nal Justice Administration Fees Imposed by San Diego County SUBMITTED BY: Resolution $3,855 for Litigation city Attorne~Q, 1'11/,7 Appropriating an Additional the continuation of the Booking Fees 4j5ths Vote: Yes X No Commencing July 1, 1992, under the auspices of a new state law, the County imposed a booking feell of $176 per criminal defendant arrested by our police department. While we are protesting the amount of the fee and the authority to impose same in pending litigation, and reserve from general fund resources in the event of an adverse decision, the adoption of the attached ordinance would create a means, in the interim, of collecting it from criminal defendants booked through the system during the pendency of the litigation if it eventually proves unsuccessful. Therefore, this is a measure that will protect our general fund from a possibly significant drain on resources, and will cause it to be paid by those criminal defendants causing us to incur the possible liabil i ty . RECOMMENDATION: Place the attached ordinance on first reading and adopt it on second reading at the next permissible meeting. Adopt a resolution appropriating an additional $3,855 for the continuation of the pending litigation. Discussion: Reason for Proposinq the Attached Ordinance Pursuant to prior Council authorization, the City of Chula vista (as well as most other cities in the County) is currently suing the County over the implementation of booking fees. 1. More technically administration fees. referred to as criminal justice t.-j Under the state legislation,Y the County assumes authority to impose booking fees on cities for the booking and other processing of prisoners when they are turned over to the County by our arresting officers. In the litigation, the City is disputing the authority of the legislation permitting the County to impose booking fees and is furthermore disputing the manner in which the proposed booking fees have been calculated. The litigation, however, looks like it is going to be long and involved and if the City were to be unsuccessful, the city could have a large unfunded liability for the past booking fees that are now not being paid over to the County.~ To mitigate the risk of this liability, the City has set aside, since April I, 1991, $404,707.00 into a special fund from our general fund. While this procedure protects against a sudden, large liability in the advent of an adverse ruling, it still constitutes a gradual drain on general fund resources. The attached ordinance mitigates even further the adverse risk of loss in the litigation by requesting that the courts require a person who is convicted as a result of the arrest or put on probation in lieu of conviction to pay, as a condition of their probation or fine, the booking fee that San Diego County is alleging is due them from the City. The money will be placed into a trust account managed by the Court, but we will get the credit for same as we authorize its payment to the County when the litigation is resolv€d. This is obviously an additional advantage to the City above and beyond the general fund set aside procedure we are currently implementing because we would be collecting it from the criminal defendant that is causing the fee to be incurred in the first place. Our general fund would be relieved of the burden to the extent we may be successful in collecting it from such criminal defendants. Appropriation for Pendinq Litiqation As you may recall, the Council has authorized the City's participation in a small "joint exercise of powers" committee 2. Government Code S29550 et seq. 3. Due to the adoption of the protest procedure, the city of Chula vista has been withholding payment pending the outcome of the litigation. This is a procedure sanctioned by the provisions of the Government Code S907. t,-,;. ("JEPC") to conduct and manage this particular litigation against the County. The committee is composed of four city attorneys (including the Chula vista city Attorney) and two city managers (including the Chula Vista City Manager) and reports to the city Attorneys Association. Many cities allover the state sued their respective counties, and all of the litigation was consolidated in a Sacramento Court. In our particular litigation, the JEPC retained the services of Libby Silver, Esq. of Meyers, Nave, Riback and Silver, to represent the various participating cities, and the costs are being shared in proportion to the number of bookings each has had. The JEPC originally appropriated $50,000 for the litigation, and our respective share was $3,855, the same as now. The JEPC has now spent almost all of the original appropriation, and it is the recommendation of the Executive Committee and of this author that the JEPC appropriate an additional $50,000, our contributive share of which would be $3,500 additional. This is very cost effective litigation. In addition, the City Attorney desires to take the Council into closed session to advise them regarding the progress of the litigation and request authorization to commence negotiations for a settlement. Fiscal Impact: The general fund will be relieved of having to pay the booking fees to the extent the Courts may agree to, and be successful in, collecting same from the criminal defendant which required the booking in the first instance. The success rate is unknown, but assuming it may be 60% successful, in an average year, and an average years bookings costs us about $300,000, the general fund would be relieved of a $180,000 expenditure to the County. F:\home\attomey\BookI t,-J /6 -'1 ORDINANCE NO. 025~/ AN ORDINANCE OF THE REQUIRING RECOVERY ADMINISTRATION FEES COUNTY CITY OF CHULA VISTA OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE IMPOSED BY SAN DIEGO The city Council of the City of Chula vista does ordain as follows: SECTION I: Government Code 529550.1 authorizes a city to recover any criminal justice administration fees imposed by a county on the city pursuant to Government Code !;29550; and the county of San Diego has enacted an ordinance imposing criminal justice administration fees on the City of Chula vista in the amount of $154.00 pursuant to the authority of Government Code !;29550. SECTION II: The City of Chula vista disputes the amount of the criminal justice administration fee imposed pursuant to said ordinance, and has refused to pay said fee, pursuant to the authority of Government Code !;907. SECTION III: Pursuant to the authority of Government Code 529550, the city Manager is authorized and directed to recover all criminal justice administration fees imposed on the City of Chula vista by the County of San Diego. SECTION IV: At such time as the dispute between the City of Chula vista and the County of San Diego as to the amount of the criminal justice administration fee is resolved, the City Manager or his designee shall seek recovery of all criminal justice administration fees as authorized by Government Code !;29550.1 from any person arrested by officers of the City of Chula vista and convicted of any criminal offense related to the arrest. SECTION V: The courts of San Diego County are hereby requested to order payment in the amount of $154.00 for the criminal justice administration fees, as authorized by Government Code !;29550.1, by convicted persons at the time of entering judgment of conviction of any person arrested by officers of the City of Chula vista. Execution of the order for payment shall be made in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action. SECTION VI: The courts of San Diego County are hereby requested to imposed as a condition of probation in order that the convicted person reimburse the City of Chula vista for criminal justice administration fees imposed on the city of Chula vista by San Diego County in the amount of $154.00 as a result of the 1 ~ ..s- arrest, booking and process of the convicted person. SECTION VII: Until such time as the dispute between the City of Chula vista and the county of San Diego as to the amount of the criminal justice administration fee is resolved, the courts of San Diego County are hereby requested to have all criminal justice administrative fees paid by convicted persons in a trust account administered by the County, the Court Administrator, or the County Auditor, to be held for the benefit of those cities required to pay such fees to the County. At such time as the aforementioned dispute is resolved, said cities may recover the amount of criminal justice administration fees previously paid into said trust fund, together with all interest accruing on such fees and thereafter, all of such fees are to be collected by the cities as prescribed in Government Code 1. SECTION VIII: This ordinance shall be published once in the Chula vista Star News, a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published in San Diego County and circulated in the City of Chula Vista, within fifteen (15) days from and after its adoption and shall ake effect and be enforced thirty (30) days after its adoption. nd nc ttorney Bruce M. Boogaard, F: \home\anorney\bookJees .ord 2 ~-~ RESOLUTION NO. 1?lt 7 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL $3,855 FOR THE CONTINUATION OF THE BOOKING FEES LITIGATION WHEREAS, the Council has previously authorized the City's participation in a small "joint exercise of powers" committee ("JEPC") to conduct and manage the litigation against the County regarding booking fees; and WHEREAS, the JPEC retained the services of an attorney to represent the various participating cities, and the costs are being shared in proportion to the number of bookings each city has had; and WHEREAS, the JEPC originally appropriated $50,000 for the litigation, which money has now been spent and it is the City Attorney's recommendation to appropriate an additional $50,000, of which Chula vista's contributive share would be $3,855 additional. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby appropriate an additional $3,855 from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund to Account 100-0150-5202 for the continuation of the booking fees li tigation. Presented and Approved as to form by Bruce~o~~a~ttorneY ~-7 COUNCIL AGENDASTATEMENT Item Number 7 Meeting Date 07/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution J 7/S" Approving an Extension of the Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and Remy & Thomas and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute Said Agreement SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City Manager Krempl4(c (4j5ths Vote:Yes_NolU REVIEWED BY: City Manager?, The City of Chula Vista is the agency designated to approve consulting contracts for the Otay Ranch. The work being requested of Remy & Thomas is to continue environmental legal review of the Otay Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and supporting documents. Remy & Thomas has, since November 19, 1991, provided legal assistance to the City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego in this area. The Agreement has been reviewed by all parties and is acceptable to Remy & Thomas, the Baldwin Company and the City. The County is supportive of the scope of services to be undertaken. This is the third extension (and it is anticipated that this is the final extension) of that original contract executed in 1991. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution approving the Agreement with Remy & Thomas to review and provide legal input on the Otay Ranch EIR and supporting documents and authorizing the Mayor to sign the attached Agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Remy & Thomas has provided legal support on this project since November 1991. They have been instrumental in assisting and will continue to assist in: the content and focus of the EIR, and they are now providing assistance in review of the EIR including the CEQA Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations, Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Staff Report. It will also be necessary from time to time to have Remy & Thomas meet with staff and coordinate on Board of Supervisors and City Council referrals dealing with legal issues on the EIR. Remy & Thomas is involved since they can focus staff on this project in a timely manner. Because of the size of the project and the amount of time involved, Remy & Thomas can provide initial legal expertise to both the City and County. Because of this unique project, an objective third party legal counsel has been invaluable in this process. Further, we would note that they offer special CEQA expertise which is not available in-house. This request is being made to keep the same legal team together through the hearing process. This is especially important relative to the EIR since revised findings will be ?-J Page 2, Item No. Meeting Date 07/13/93 7 necessary and Remy & Thomas has prepared previous versions of those findings in the past. Remy & Thomas has also provided advise about the structure of the EIR and would be best able to respond to Board or Council questions during the hearings. The City Attorney's office is also being utilized to ensure that the legal requirements of the City are being observed on this project. Since this is a joint City jCounty review process, Remy & Thomas has and will continue to be utilized to provide third party input and specialized CEQA expertise. Also, Remy & Thomas has been able to focus their attention on this project in a timely manner on fairly complex issues. This has permitted staff to respond to the Planning Commissions and the public in a timely manner. In November of 1991, the Otay Ranch General Manager and Baldwin requested that legal counsel be retained to assist on the project to provide timely review and guidance on the EIR and to serve as an initial third party reviewer of all of the environmental documents. Remy & Thomas (Tina Thomas) was recommended by the City Attorney based on past City experience. That recommendation was approved by the County of San Diego and the Baldwin Company. During 1990, Remy & Thomas invoiced the City of Chula Vista $7,380.85. During 1991, that amount was $39,462.17. During 1992, that figure was $42,146.34. In 1993 (through May) that figure was $13,944.33. This request is for an additional $30,000.00 in services. FISCAL IMPACT: There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Chula Vista because the Baldwin Company will be funding this scope-of-work ($30,000.00). Attachment memos#5:\R&TA113b.aji ?...~ RESOLUTION NO. I 715(, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN EXTENSION OF THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND REMY & THOMAS FOR LEGAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE OTAY RANCH PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT The city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the city of Chula vista is the agency designated to approve consulting contracts for the Otay Ranch; and WHEREAS, Remy & Thomas is requested to continue to perform consulting services regarding environmental legal review of the Otay Ranch Environmental Impact Report and supporting documents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve an extension of the agreement between the City of Chula vista and Remy & Thomas for legal consulting services for the Otay Ranch Project, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. Presented by "1 the City of ecute said a BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vi George Krempl, Deputy City Manager Bruce M. Attorney C:\RS\Remy&Thomas 7~317-tf Renewal of Agreement with Remy and Thomas for Legal Consulting Services This Agreement is made .this q1}l day of :rl.)~ , 1993, for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the parties, between the City of Chula Vista (" City ") herein, a municipal corporation of the State of California, and Remy and Thomas, a professional law firm ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals Whereas, the City and County of San Diego desire to employ a law firm with expertise and experience in reviewing environmental documents for compliance with the guidelines and procedures of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in reference to the Otay Ranch Project; and Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to Agency within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties a. General Duties I. Consultant shall review environmental documents prepared by the City or their consultants consisting of a Program Environmental Impact Report for compliance with CEQA and advise City/Otay Ranch Project Team staff as to necessary and relevant changes that may be required; and ii. Consultant shall provide guidance to City staff as to processing of all supporting environmental documents to assure compliance with CEQA requirements such as the Findings, Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program; and Ill. Consultant shall provide legal advice to City staff to defend litigation predicated upon alleged deficiencies in environmental documents or improper processing of said documents. 1 7-5' (the duties of the Consultant as herein in this section contained may hereinafter be referred to as "General Duties"); and b. Scope of Work and Schedule Work assignments under this Agreement will be issued on an as needed basis. The schedule will be agreed upon at the time that the tasks are assigned. c. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this Agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall be performed in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. d. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed by it are protected by worker's compensation insurance and the Consultant has the coverage under public liability, property damages and errors and omissions insurance policies which this Agreement requires to be demonstrated in the form of a certificate of insurance. Consultant will provide, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, the following certificates of insurance to the Agency: Statutory Worker's Compensation coverage plus $1,000,000.00 Employers liability coverage. General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000.00 combined single limit, and which is primary to any policy which the Agency may otherwise carry ("primary coverage"), and which treats the employees of the Agency in the same manner as members of the general public ("cross liability coverage"). All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a Best's Rating of "A, Class V", or better, or shall meet with the approval of the Agency's Risk Manager. All policies shall provide that same may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Agency. 2 7-t, 2. Duties of the City: a. Consultation and Cooperation City agrees to provide information, data, items, and materials as may be required by Consultant in order to carry out Consultant's duties under this Agreement. b. Compensation i. The City hereby agrees to pay an hourly fee of $195.00 to attorneys Michael H. Remy, Tina A. Thomas, 1. William Yeates and James G. Moose and an hourly fee of $150.00 to attorneys Whitman F. Manley, Matthew R. Campbell and John H. Mattox. Services of Land Use Analyst, Georganna Foondos, will be billed at the hourly rate of $75.00. Time for research done by a law clerk or paralegal will be billed at an hourly rate of $50.00. Attorney time for travel shall not be billed to City unless same is also actively spent in the rendition of legal services. ii. In addition to the above attorney fees, City hereby agrees to pay to the attorney all applicable costs, such as: filing fees, copying costs at $0.25 (25 cents) per copy, mileage costs at $0.35 (35 cents) per mile; printing costs by a professional printer, as charged, long distance phone charges, as charged; postage charges, as charged; reimbursement for lodging and meal expenses in instances requiring out of county travel including but not limited to any costs involving common carriers (e.g., airplane), and all other agreed upon costs or expenses related to this matter. Ill. Consultant shall not incur costs or billings which, in total, exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00) without further written approval of the City. IV. It is understood that the City has established the Otay Ranch Trust Fund to account for and pay all expenses from deposits made by the project proponent, Baldwin Vista, Ltd. If there is a default of the proponent, compensation for the services performed shall be paid only from deposited monies and from no other asset or resource of the City, a special obligation which is not a burden upon, or appropriated from, the General Fund of the City. c. Additional Scope of Work In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the General Duties and Scope of Work (n Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, 3 7-? J'IJL l!J~ ' '~,~ l~;~' 40 ~:t:I'I'r' .!.: "H'~JI'I"'~:S -~lb-44~-~~ll i" F. 1/1 - consultant shall perfnrm ~~m~ on 11 I,ilflt: ~ll\J Ill<l.l"ljl\l~ \:>iI,H~ 1'41h~ rAtes set forth ill S""LiUH 2[:,. All compenslltion for Additional Servicec chalI be paid monthly as billed. 3. Administration of Contract Tn.. f~llty heTf.'by rll'"l~nl1l..,~ 1IIl, ()ll1Y Ml1llil~':;I'. 01' his d~sill:ncc, 1I~ its loprcaentative for the C~I(lillaLion and administration of tho work performed by Consultant herein required. Copy of 011 eorrespondenc\l will be provided to the City Atlom!",y, ~nci impol'W"lt lel:al dt'Cbioll' or wudu"iullS will hI'> r/\vicwcd by the City Attorney. 4. Term Consultant shall p.dorm :lll ot me Defined ,';I'TY!r,r,s h~rr.ln rr.llllill;;1l \If il ~s I\\NY ~e Tl'\luin:;J ullLiI the Liml1~ of thl'> cumulative total amount lIuthorized under this A.greement is reached. 5. Finam:illl Illtc.1'osts of Consultant Consultnnt warrwtg :ma represent~ thar nehhr,T shr.. nor hr:r i If 11 uclli<l.l" [Ill\\ily l\l?\~~1;Iers, nor her employ""'" 01 agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have :my interest, directly or indirectly, what~oever in propilrty which would constH\ltfl ~ r.nnflkt ofintere~t or give Thfl ~pp~l1rl1T11", IIf ~\Ilili Ii"lifli..t il\ r/\l.\tion to the pr~ieots id,mtified in this Agreement. Conaultnnt furthllI wmmts and represems ThilT nil IlfI"lIi~1;; IIf [\I~\II~ M\~l';'j'I\\<i\nt, rc::uJ1lue,,,Liull, M,uideration, g!'Utuity or other rew:rrd or g:&in hllS been madl', to Consultant or Consultant Associate.s. COnS\lltilnt prnmi~~ to advise City of any such promi"" lh"l llld.'y be Inade during the Term of thi~ Agrelilment, or for 12 months thereafter. ("onsll1r~nr ill::rl"',;;,~ 1,Ii~l ll\:;il!liil C';'I\~\lltal~t I'I6r her immediate fwnily m8mben, nor her ':'Inployees Of ugcnw, ahall o.cquir8 any &lIeh Prohibited Inrerl'8t within th/'i Tr.rrn of this Agreemc::m, ur [Ul 12 llluulh" Aft,:,! the el:pitntioll of thia Agreement. CUH,"1Uu\t may !lOt conduct or aolioit uny bu~ine&& for :lony pm to this Agrl'l':mflnr, or for any third party whiCh may be. in conflIct with COll~ull<1l1l'~ Ivwull"itiUti,:,s under 11Iis Agreement. 6. Hold Harmless Conaultnnt ugree& to dlilfend, indemnify. and holn harm1rnsll the City fNm i\Il4 a!;\;<lust all liability, "Q~, line) exp<:I1,e (illduJiul> withoot limitation llltOmoyo' feec) oriCinll from lms of or damage to Clny property wh3.tEOever or injury to or nf'.'Ith of ~ny person whQm~v~r 4 7-l( whomsoever caused or alleged to be caused or occasioned by the negligent act or omission of Consultant or any agent or employee of Consultant arising out of or in connection with this Agreement or the work to be performed by Consultant hereunder, except to the extent such liability, cost or expense is caused by the negligence of the City. 7. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his/her obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all fmished or unfmished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amount payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. 8. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Manager or his designee determines that the Consultant's negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions in the plans or contract specifications, Consultant and City shall select a mutually acceptable arbitrator with legal and technical expertise in preparing EIRs and in the application of CEQA to determine whether Agency shall be reimbursed for the additional expenses incurred by the City including engineering, construction and/or restoration expense. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this Agreement. 9. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason for giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just an equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other 'llaterials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 5 ')-'1 10. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City which City may unreasonable deny. II. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other county without the express written consent of Agency. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 12. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contract with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of the City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including, but not limited, overtime, retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. 13. Responsible Charge Consultant hereby designates Tina A. Thomas shall be Consultant's representative ("Project Manager") to the project for the duration of the project. No substitution for this position shall be allowed without written approval from the City. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement against the Agency unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the Agency of the City of Chula Vista and acted upon in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, 6 7"'10 the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with Agency for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 15. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or parnclpates in the preparation of a report or document as a result of the scope of work required of Consultant, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion, in said report or document a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. 16. Miscellaneous a. Consultant Not Authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by Agency, Consultant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. b. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the address identified adjacent to the signatures of the parties represented. c. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the part against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. d. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction form its principal to enter 7 7"'} I into this Agreement; that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. e. Governing LawlVenue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. f. Attorney Fees Should a dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of that claim, including costs and attorney fees. [End of page. Next page is signature page.] 8 7w/J- Signature Page to Agreement with Remy and Thomas for Legal Consulting Services IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement this _ day of , 1993. CITY OF CHULA VISTA By: Tim Nader Mayor Attest: Beverly Authelet City Clerk Approved as to form: Bruce M. Boogard, City Attorney Remy and Thomas By: Tina A. Thomas ~~v t:f. 7/f/'/-%1'~ 3061396.001 \RETAINER 9 7" J 3 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ?' SUBMITTED BY: Meeting Date 7/13/93 /7/.5'; Resolution Authorizing the Temporary Use of Legislative Office for Interim City Attorney Department usage During Construction, and Making an Appropriation Therefor city AttorneY~ ITEM TITLE: 4/5ths Vote: Yes X No__ Pursuant to prior Council authorization, the expansion of the city Attorney's Office construction is about to be let out for public bid. During the construction period, which will take approximately two months, it will be more safe and conducive to the conduct of business if the city Attorney's Office and staff, or part of them, could relocate. It so happens that congressman Filner's prior offices in the Legislative Building are now vacant. It is a substantially undersized facility for our usage, but may be sufficient on an interim basis. The city Attorney's Office is requesting an appropriation and permission of Council to utilize the Legislative Building, Robert Filner's former offices, to serve as an interim City Attorney's office during the period of construction. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution authorizing the city Attorney's Office to occupy the Legislative Building, Robert Filner's former offices, as an interim City Attorney's office during the period of construction of the City Attorney's expansion. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION: We anticipate that the City Attorney's expansion project can go to bid in approximately two weeks. We anticipate that the construction project will take approximately two months, beginning approximately two weeks after Council awards the contract. We anticipate return to the remodelled City Attorney office spaces by approximately November 15, 1993. It was hoped that construction could be phased to allow continued use of current space throughout construction. Al though inconvenient, this was though'c less disruptive than actually moving ~'I Item Page ~ 2 the entire off ice operation. However, asbestos has now been discovered in the subfloor, requiring special removal procedures, and creating a health risk to staff to try to continue use during removal/construction. At one point, councilmembers had suggested that the City Attorney's occupy the Council Conference Room. However, this will result in the loss of a heavily used conference room. We also followed up on the suggestion of using empty space available in the Zogob Building, possibly in the office with the South Bay Community Services Office. However, there is only one small (300 square feet) room available (on the second floor), plus potential use of South Bay Community Services' current conference room. The latter is much smaller than the Council Conference Room, and would require physical alterations to close it off from their reception area. Use of those combined spaces would be very inadequate in terms of space, separate office staff, and be very disruptive to the day-to-day services of South Bay Community Services. The cost for the one small second story office alone is approximately $330 per month (plus utilities), according to Pam Buchan in the Community Development Department. Additional costs would be involved for closing off the South Bay Community Services' current conference room, as well as space rental, for that option. Public Works advises that it would cost approximately $1,500.00 to move office furnishings to the Filner offices and back. The telephone company estimates $1,000.00 to set up 5 lines and 2 dedicated lines (for computer modems for legal research) in the Filner offices and return to the normal setup in the remodelled offices. FISCAL IMPACT: No cost for space use if you approve the resolution authorizing city Attorney use of the former Filner legislative offices. There would be the "opportunity cost" equal to lost rent for the space. Transition costs (moving, telephone and computer connections) will be approximately $2,500.00, requiring an appropriation of $2,500 from the General Fund to Account 600-6001- GG141. (F:\Home\Attomey\Relocate.CA) 8'''' ,J.. RESOLUTION NO. /715? RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE TEMPORARY USE OF LEGISLATIVE OFFICE FOR INTERIM CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT USAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND MAKING AN APPROPRIATION THEREFOR WHEREAS, pursuant to prior Council authorization, the expansion of the city Attorney's office construction is about to be let out for public bid; and WHEREAS, during the construction period, which will take approximately two months, it will be more safe and conducive to the conduct of business if the city Attorney's office and staff could relocate; and WHEREAS, the City Attorney's office is requesting an appropriation and permission of Council to utilize an office in the Legislative Building as an interim office during the period of construction; and WHEREAS, Public Works advised it will cost approximately $1,500 for moving expenses and $1,000 for telephone lines, which needs to be appropriated from the General Fund. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the temporary use of Legislative Office for Interim City Attorney Department Usage during construction. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $2,500 is hereby appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund into ccount 600-60 -GG141. and Ated a B uce M. Boogaard, City Arney 8''' .3 COUNCIL AGENDA STAlEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 Resolution / '7/58'" approving the first Extension Agreement for the Community Youth Center Operating Agreement SUBMIT1ED BY: Director of Parks and RecreatiOl\L\.-_ REVIEWED BY: City Manager {;~~,~6 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X) On March 12, 1992, the City entered into a joint use agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District and the Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista for the operation and maintenance of the Community Youth Center on "L" Street. A section of that agreement stipulates that the City will review the operations of the Boys and Girls Club periodically, and that the City shall extend the term of the agreement if the Club is providing appropriate services and support during their operating hours at the Center. Staff is satisfied with the Club's performance, and is recommending that the agreement be extended to July 1, 1995. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the first Extension Agreement for the Community Youth Center Operating Agreement between the City, the Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista and the Sweetwater Union High School District, for a two year period to July 1, 1995. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of June 17, 1993, the Parks and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to support the Youth Center Operating Agreement Extension as presented. DISCUSSION: On March 12, 1992, the City entered into a joint use agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District (District) and the Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista (Club) regarding the operations and maintenance of the Community Youth Center on "L" Street. Section 3.7 of that agreement stipulated that the City would review the Club's operations at the Center between January and April of 1993, for the purpose of evaluating the applicability of extending the agreement with the Club. The operational review was to include the Club's provision of adequate and appropriate programming as well as adequate maintenance of the facility. City staff members have been working closely with the Club since the center opened. The evaluation of the Club's programs has been an ongoing process, as has the evaluation of the Club's care of the physical plant. Quarterly meetings with all three entities have taken place, as well as meetings to discuss specific use schedules at the facility. The Club has been offering a wide variety of programs for youth from ages 6 to 18. The Center is open five days each week, on a year-round basis, for drop-in activities that include games, crafts, field trips, and athletic activities. The Club's programming was based in part on the results of a interest survey that they conducted at the local junior and senior high schools. Most activities are separated by age, and specific times are designated for different age groups at the facility. Average daily attendance during the Club's operations is approximately 175. In addition to drop-in activities, the Club offers more structured programs. Operation Secure is a program that helps Club members wp\ycenter.ext 9'/ protect themselves from crime and violence at school, at home, and on the streets. The Keystone Club is a small group leadership program for high school students that is operated totally by the club members. The club members elect their own officers, and plan and implement their own activities. An environmentally-focused education program, The Ultimate Journey, is designed to increase the environmental sensitivity of program participants through games, crafts, and discovery projects. Operation SMART (Science Math And other Related Technologies) is a program designed for junior high school girls to promote interest in the sciences and related fields. The Club also offers a Teen Club, organized sports leagues, and dance and activity classes. A popular day camp program (Funshine) is offered, as is an Early Morning Care program that offers before school programming for children of working parents. Stepping Stones is a physical education program for elementary school age girls that helps prepare them for competitive and non-competitive sports activities in the future. The Club also offers space and time for youth to work on homework assignments, and will offer tutoring on a limited basis on request. Based on a request from the City, the Club offered a Tiny Tots program during the Fall and Winter of 1992 to supplement the City's program, since public demand for the program is extremely high. Staff is satisfied that the Club is providing a wide variety of programming for elementary, junior and senior high school youth, and is recommending the two year extension of the agreement to July 1, 1995. The Club is actively working with the Parks and Recreation Department in identifying programs additional that will better serve junior and senior high school students. In addition, the Club is an active participant in the Youth Coalition, and is also actively involved with the Youth Summit process. Staff believes that the Club will continue to offer appropriate programming at the Center, and will work in harmony with the City in expanding programming for the youth of Chula Vista. The Boys and Girls Club and the Sweetwater Union High School District have reviewed the Extension Agreement, and they are in full support of staffs recommendation to approve the agreement. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachment: Extension Agreement wp\ycenter.ext 9,. .l.. RESOLUTION NO. / '1/SY RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FIRST EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OPERATING AGREEMENT, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME WHEREAS, on March 12, 1992, the City entered into a Joint Use Agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District and the Boys and Girls Club of Chula vista for the operation and maintenance of the community Youth Center on "L" Street; and WHEREAS, a section of that Agreement stipulates that the City will review the operations of the Boys and Girls Club periodically, and that the city shall extend the term of the agreement if the Club is providing appropriate services and support during their operating hours at the Center; and WHEREAS, staff is satisfied with the Club's performance, and is recommending that the Agreement be extended to July 1, 1995. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the First Extension Agreement for the Community Youth Center Operating Agreement, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vis a Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation al Presented by F:\home\attomey\CYCxtn.res 9-.3!Q-i FIRST EXTENSION AGREEMENT FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OPERATING AGREEMENT This Agreement, entered into this day of , 1993 for the purposes of reference only and effective as of the date last executed between the parties, is executed between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation ("City"); THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHULA VISTA, INC., a nonprofit public benefit corporation, d.b.a. Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista ("Club"); and the SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT, a political subdivision of the State of California ("District"); and was made with reference to the following facts: R E C I TAL S WHEREAS, the parties entered into an Agreement dated March 12, 1992 for the purposes of reference entitled "Community Youth Center Operating Agreement" by which the City and the District granted to Club certain rights to occupy and operate the Community Youth Center as the term is therein defined on certain terms, conditions, covenants and promises therein contained; and, WHEREAS, Section 3.7 permits the City to review in the first instance between January and April of 1993, and annually thereafter, the operations of the Club at the facility including the Club's provisions of programming, the extent to which it meets elementary, junior and high school youth needs, their maintenance of the facility and other factors, all of which are more fully articulated therein, and upon satisfaction with the performance of the Club to the date of review, the City council is 'entitled to extend the license therein granted by execution of an Extension Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed the hereinabove referenced factors regarding the Club's operation at the facility, and is generally satisfied therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO DO HEREBY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The Community Youth Center Operating Agreement is hereby extended to July 1, 1995. All other terms, conditions, promises and covenants therein contained shall remain in full force and effect, unaffected by the provisions of this First Extension Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto, having been fully authorized by their respective boards to execute this Agreement, and having duly read and understood the terms and provisions hereof, do hereby set their hand to indicate their intent to be bound by the terms hereof. 1 '" 9-,j DATED: THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Mayor of the City of Chula Vista Attest City Clerk as t1;= City Attorney C:\HOME\A TIORNEY\CYCxtn.llt ~ 2 9-/' DATED; BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CHULA VISTA lD,~Jj~ DATED:91~/0 /qq,j SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL D~ Minutes of a Regular Meeting of the PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Thursday 6:00 p.m. June 17, 1993 Public Services Building Conference Room 2&3 ******************* 1. ROLL CALL Members present: Members late: Commissioners, Sandoval-Fernandez, Helton, Roland Lind (6:57), Hall (6:18), Carpenter (6:17) 2. APPROVAL OF MINU1'FS Motion to approve the minutes as distributed. MSC WILLEIT/SANDOV AL-FERNANDEZ 4-0 (HaIl, Carpenter, Lind out) 3. PUBUC HEARINGS OR REMARKS NONE 4. DIREcroR'S REPORT Director Valenzuela highlighted some of the activities being offered by the Department for the summer season. He also highlighted the recently funded $73,000 Youth Action Plan and thanked the Commissioners for their support throughout the City's budget process. 5. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY NONE 6. ACTION ITEMS Unfinished Business a Joint Workshop Debriefinl! Director Valenzuela drew the Commission's attention to the draft minutes of the Joint City CouncillParks and RecreatioG Commission meeting which were included in the packets. Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez asked where we go from here? '7-7 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION June 17, 1993 PAGE 2 Commissioner Hall feels that the Commission should send a recommendation to the Council to sit down with the School District and work out a comprehensive joint use agreement. Motion to recommend to Council that they meet with the school board to begin to address several of the issues discussed at the joint workshop. Commissioner Willett feels that the issues should be turned over to staff and that the Director should come back to the Commission with a point paper, offering options for the Commission to vote on, and with recommendation on some of the items. It was suggested that the motion be withdrawn and restated under item 6d. Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez stated that her motion was more comprehensive than just joint use with the School District. Commissioner Hall asked the Director to give a breakdown on joint use that is currently occurring with the School District and how these are being administered. Commissioner Carpenter asked if a joint meeting of Parks and Recreation Commission and School Board was being suggested. Commissioner Helton called a Point of Order on the basis that the discussion had strayed too far from the motion, and the motion should be dealt with before the discussion continued. Commissioner Hall asked Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez to withdraw her motion until later in the agenda, as he felt that it was insufficient to answer the question at hand. Commissioner Helton felt that the motion was general enough in nature that it could be made under this agenda item. MS SANDOV AL-FERNANDEZJCARPENTER (Motion withdrawn by the maker) Motion to accept the Director's outline in pursuing Council's request. MSUC WILLEIT/HELTON 6-0-1 (SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ ABSTAINED, she feels that the motion is ridiculous) b. Youth Summit Dcbricfinl! Director Valenzuela thanked the Commissioners for their participation and support in the Youth Summit process, and gave an overview of the process thus far. He stated that the final results are being compiled and will be brought to the Commission at their July meeting. Commissioner Helton stated that she had heard very positive feedback from students through school teachers regarding the Youth Summit process. 9,r PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION June 17, 1993 PAGE 3 Commissioner Carpenter stated that she had been very impressed with what she had seen of the Youth Summit. She feels that it can make a real difference in the City of Chula Vista. In addition, the feedback that she has received from students indicates that for the first time they feel as though they have a real voice in what is happening. New Business a. Park Villas Project Director Valenzuela gave a brief history of this project and presented the Commission with pictures of the strip of land that is proposed for lease. He then introduced Mr. Sanderson of the Barrio Corporation and Gerlinda Topzand of San Diego County who further elaborated on the project. Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez expressed concerns about setting a precedent of leasing park land to the private sector. While she feels that the community may be well served in this instance, there is a real danger in setting such a precedent for the future. It is her feeling that the shortage of land should have been taken into consideration before the project was put together, rather than have the project completely planned specifically for this site before asking to encroach on a public park:. She feels that the Commission has been put into a position where they "have no choice" but to approve the encroachment, or the whole project will fail. Director Valenzu~la pointed out that this precedent has already been set with leases to the American Legion. the Boys and Girls Club and the YMCA Commissioner Willett stated that he has walked the area and feels that the park will not lose anything by the lease of this land. Motion to recommend approval of the project and the lease of the land to Civic Center Barrio Housing f'orporation for 40 years. MSC WllLETT/ROIAND 6-0 (Lind out) b. Change of Meeting Time Commissioner Lind asked whether the Commissioners would like to change the time of their meeting as there is frequently a lack of a quorum at 6:00 pm. Commissioner Carpenter stated that recent changes in the nature of her job mean that she can no longer arrive at the Commission meetings by 6:00 pm. She states that 6:10 to 6:15 is the earliest she can arrive. Motion to change meeting time from 6:00 to 6:15 M HALL (Motion failed for lack of a second) 9"7 PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION June 17, 1993 PAGE 4 Motion to have the Commission meet at 6:30 pm. MSC CARPENTER/SANDOVAlrFERNANDEZ 4-2-1 (ROLAND ABSTAINED, he declined to state his reason for abstaining at this time) c. Graffiti Eradication Policy Director Valenzuela stated that the Policy before the Commission had been a Department Policy for quite some time, but at this point staff is proposing to send it to Council for approval to elevate it to a City Policy. Motion to accept the policy as proposed MSUC HELTON!HAIL 7-0 d. Joint Use of School District Facilities Commissioner Roland stated that this is up to the City Council. Director Valenzuela informed the Commission that implementation of the Youth Action Plan is contingent upon the joint use of facilities. He feels that this should be identified as an issue and a meeting of the minds should be reached between the policy makers from the City and the School District. He suggested that if the Commission supports this idea, a memorandum could be forwarded to Council so stating. Motion to forward a memo to Council through the Chair requesting Council to meet with the School Board, or that a committee be formed, in order to discuss joint use agreements and associated issues that go with it, with the associated issues being outlined by the Director of Parks and Recreation. MSUC HALlJWILLEIT 7-0 e. Extension of Youth Center Operating Agreement Director Valenzuela called the Commission's attention to the copy of the proposed Youth Center Operating Agreement Extension which was included in their information packets. He then answered the Commission's questions about current usage and conditions at the Youth Center. Motion to support the Youth Center Operating Agreement Extension as presented. MSUC WILLETT/SANDOV AlrFERNANDEZ 7-0 7. COMMUNICATIONS a. Written Correspondence NONE 9"'/tj PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION June 17, 1993 PAGE 5 b. Commissioner's Comments ROLAND - Commissioner Roland verbally tendered his resignation from the Commission, effective immediately, due to health reasons, and stated that he would follow up with a written resignation. The Commissioners expressed their regret at Commissioner Roland's leaving. SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ - Complimented staff on the high quality of our parks. She stated that recent visitors to the parks from all over the County had expressed to her how well kept the parks were, especially Discovery Park. WILLETI - Presented a map of the City with all of the ballfields, lighted and unlighted, marked on it. In addition, he commended Commissioner Helton on the speech she had given at the Otay Ranch meeting. Adjournment to the next regularly scheduled meeting of July 16, 1993. Respectfully submitted, A~ 4&-tv Carole Cramer Stohr 9;/1 TInS PAGE BLANK r; -/~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item I (J Meeting Date 7/13/93 Resolution 17/,se; Rescinding Resolution No. 15323 Authorizing an Exchange of Property with Rancho del Sur Partnership Director of Parks and RecreatioQ.1. Director of Public Works ?It / SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: "l~ City Manager ~,<~ f.r) (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No 10 On September 26, 1989, the City of Chula Vista approved an exchange of Open Space property with the Rancho del Sur Partnership, to facilitate the development of medical offices on Telegraph Canyon Road in the Sun bow I development. The Partnership and a medical doctor were jointly designing a medical center building on a triangular parcel of property along Telegraph Canyon Road. The property from the open space district was required to meet a parking lot spaces condition from the Planning Department. RECOMMENDATION: That Council rescind the Resolution authorizing the exchange of Open Space property; direct the return of the cash deposit, less City costs, to the Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership; and authorize the reconveyance of their title by quitclaim deed. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable. ~NOT SCANNED DISCUSSION: On September 12, 1989, Council adopted Resolution #15294 (lhachment A) declaring its intention to exchange a portion of an open space boundary area (4,160 sq. ft.) in Open Space District #18, Sun bow. Rancho del Sur Partnership would then exchange 3,640 sq. ft. of their property and Q landscape the new open space area and the roadside parkway. The land exchange was to provide ~ sufficient land to accommodate the required parking for the medical office project proposed by the ~ Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership. U At the September 26,1989 Council meeting, a public hearing was conducted, and Resolution #15323 ~ 1t- (Attachment B) was adopted. The Resolution declared the property to be surplus, unusable public land, o *and authorized an exchange of property with the Rancho del Sur Partnership. Z =* The Teiegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership prepared the necessary documents to effect the exchange of land. The documents included a grant deed from the Partnership, a grant deed from the City and a grant deed consolidating the Partnership land. Additionally, the City received a cash deposit in the amount of $62,600 to guarantee the construction of landscape improvements. The partnership gave us their grant deed which remains unrecorded but we have never delivered our grant deed to them. On May 19, 1993, Mr. Jerry Alvord, Rancho del Sur Partnership, asked the City to rescind the Agreement for the land exchange and requested return of the cash deposit because the project experienced financial problems and was no longer viable. Consequently, the partnership was dissolving. The City Attorney's office has reviewed the Resolution, and because the documents have not been executed or recorded, the City can rescind the Agreement and return the cash deposit to the partnership, minus outstanding staff costs accrued against the project. FISCAL IMPACT: Approximately $2,300 in staff costs will be reimbursed to the General Fund from the $62,600 on deposit for this project; resuiting in a return to the developer of approximately $60,300. osexchge.a13 II) -I , ~y {" , RESOLUTION NO. 17 / 5~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 15323 AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH RANCHO DEL SUR PARTNERSHIP WHEREAS, on September 26, 1989, the city of Chula Vista approved an exchange of Open Space property with the Rancho del Sur Partnership, to facilitate the development of medical offices on Telegraph Canyon Road in the Sunbow I development; and WHEREAS, the Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership prepared the necessary documents to effect the exchange of land, which documents included a grant deed from the partnership, a grant deed from the City and a grant deed consolidating the Partnership land; and WHEREAS, the City received a cash deposit in the amount of $62,600 to guarantee the construction of landscape improvements, however, the partnership never executed the recording of the above documents; and WHEREAS, on May 19, 1993, Mr. Jerry Alvord, Rancho del Sur Partnership, asked the City to rescind the Agreement for the land exchange and requested return of the cash deposit; and WHEREAS, since the grant deeds have not been executed, the city can rescind the authorizing Resolution No. 15323 and return the cash deposit to the partnership, minus outstanding staff costs accrued against the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City council of the city of Chula vista does hereby rescind Resolution No. 15323 authorizing an exchange of property within Rancho del Sur Partnership and direct the return of the cash deposit to the partnership less staff costs of $2,300.00. Presented by "Or" Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation C:\rs\osxchang /0 - ;. ninutes - 7 - September 26, 1989 This item did not need to be noticed as a public hearing and, with Council's consent, was approved under the Consent Calendar. 19. PUBLIC HEARING PROPOSED REPROGRAMMING OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS RESOLUTION 15321 APPROVING REPROGRAMMING OF FEDERAL REVENUE SHARING FUNDS RESOLUTI ON 15322 APPROPRIATING $250,244,48 FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED RESERVE OF THE GENERAL FUND TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Thi s substituti on of funds will not result in fundi ng reducti ons in either the capital or operating budgets. (Principal Management ASSistant) This being the time and place as advertised, ~layor Cox declared the public hearing open. There being no public testimony, the public hearing was closed. ORDItJANCE OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was waived, passed and approved unanimously. 20. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER CHANGE TO OPEN SPACE AREA BOUNDARY IN OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 18 RESOLUTION 15323 DECLARING PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS, UNUSABLE PUBLIC LAND, WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH RANCHO DEL SUR PARTNERSHIP Ordi nance 17.08.390 requi res a pub 1 i c heari ng whenever changes to open space area boundaries are proposed. (Director of Parks Recreation) This being the time and place as advertised, tlayor Cox declared the public hearing open. Director of Parks & Recreation t~ollinedo noted that there has been a request to increase the total amount of square footage by 1500 square feet; staff has no problems with the request. J eral d Alford, Tel egraph Canyon !ledi ca 1 Partnershi p, 2445 Fifth Avenue San Diego 92101, presented a brief history of the location, described the parcel and presented slides. He noted there was a need for an additional area of proposed parking. They proposed to exchange a part of the parcel for an open space area owned by Rancho del Sur. There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was closed. Mayor Cox asked if there were modifications to be made on the resolution before Council this evening. Staff noted there was an adjustment to be made to Exhibit A but not to the resolution; there \~as no money exchanged in the transaction. RESOLUTION IHTH CHA!JGE ON EXHIBIT A, OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 (Councilman Malcolm out). /()~3 I\....,/V. "0 I 1. - Attachment A RESOLUTION NO. 15294 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA OF INTENTION TO CHANGE OPEN SPACE AREA BOUNDARY IN OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 18 AND SETTING A DATE FOR PUBLIC HEARING The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: jointly parcel Archway WHEREAS, Rancno Del Sur and designing a medical center of property along Telegraph Inn, ana Dr. Robert building on Canyon Road Matkovick are a triangular east of the \~HEREAS, the proposed complex does not have sufficient space to accommodate the necessary number of parking spaces required by the Planning Department and in order to meet this requirement, additional property needs to be acquired, and WHEREAS, development is a right-of-way which located to the south of the proposed portion of the Old Telegraph Canyon Road is now dedicated open space land, and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 17.08.390 requires a notice of intention be adopted by Council whenever a change of open space area boundary is proposed and requires that a public hearing date be established so that anyone having Objections to the cnanges may appear oefore Council and show cause why changes should not oe ordered. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby declare its intention to change the open space boundary area in Open Space District No. 18 as shown in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby sets Tuesday, Septemoer 26, 19t19 at the hour of 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California for a public hearing so that anyone having Objections to the changes may appear oefore Council and show cause why changes should not oe ordered. Presented by form by '- A- ~~. -" Manuel A. Mollinedo, Director of Parks and Recreation 62lBa City Attorney /D~tf ( ..... APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista, . "r'nta thi s 12th day of September, 1989 by the foll owi ng vote: (fO ' ,I AYES: Council members: Moore, Nader, Cox NOES: Counci1members: None ABSENT: Counci1members: Malcolm, Nader ABSTAIN: Counci1members: None ATTEST: ~,(/?riit.,ij STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authe1et, City Clerk of the City of Chu1a Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15294 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista, California, at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 12th day of September, 1989. Executed this 13th day of September, 1989. ~,f. t2lJrtfr.t - /p~S Attachment B RESOLUTION NO. 15323 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING PROPERTY TO BE SURPLUS, UNUSABLE PUBLIC LAND, WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING REQUIREMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF PROPERTY WITH RANCHO DEL SUR PARTNERSHIP The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: jointly parcel Archway WHEREAS, Rancho Del Sur and designing a medical center of property along Telegraph Inn, and Dr. Rober t building on Canyon Road Matkovick are a triangular east of the WHEREAS, the proposed complex does not have sufficient space to accommodate the necessary number of parking spaces required by the Planning Department and in order to meet this requirement, additional property needs to be acquired, and WHEREAS, development is a right-of-way which located to the south of the proposed portion of the Old Telegraph Canyon Road is now dedicated open space land, and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 17.08.390 requires a notice of intention be adopted by Council whenever a change of open space area boundary is proposed and requires that a public hearing date be established so that anyone having objections to the changes may appear before Council and show cause why changes should not be ordered, and WHEREAS, an public hear ing has been held by the Ci ty Council on September 26, 1989. , . , NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby declare the property shown on Exhibit "A" to be surplus, unusable public land in accordance with section 2.56.230 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby waive the formal bidding requirement and authorizes an exchange of property with Rancho del Sur partnership. Presented by Approved as to form by -~, I ~'tr.',_,)_~ //J~_, _',_ ( Thomas J. Harron, City Attorney ~ ( /o? . .-C-{". _~ anuel A. MOllin~~o, Dlrector of Parks and Recreation 6285a 1(/ -b Resolution PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, this 26th day of September ~ 1989 by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: McCandliss, Moore, Nader, Cox NOES: Counci 1 members: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Malcolm ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ATTEST ~~~~ ~?ver y Au e Ie, ~cfe~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 15323 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, Cal iforni a, at a regul ar meeting of sai d Ci ty Counci 1 hel d on the 26th day of Septembe; 1989. Executed this 27th day of September ,1989. 10-7 ---. i , . . i I ( c .~ / / / ,l,'1 / I~ ,: rt' @...'<I . . , . ~ 'r",; {) ,: , If 1"\[ ~(fj ""ff '\ ~ ,.,' {" ~f.fi". l>~ ,'\':( ~ " f ('1 ;\.. ., 'I 1 - '. -. i . \ \, '1'" .;{ .,. ~ \"V:'f''('~ ",. ,.; f ,"J "'-.. . \ ~";{ .....: ""'4,,,;.\\ : ~~('!'" """ .', . "'1 "'''!'' (\ f!'(' '~~\' ~"'"'''''.,' '\ \\..........lfl . ,\, \ \\' {' ''\..((~....l. "" \ "")"1" \\\\ \\\ j1to -( "t. "'''''''''1 [~/}~~';f~.~~'l /::::... / i,;t: ~~:I {::..:.; "f '{.r: I /:::,:'j,: {~~;; 1 l:}f,. (Sf fl P::',".'IlJ:, " is C. ~r~~;\1 ~ fi::',(}(, f~'~! ~ C:~:':'>;::}~'::y R: r.. ',,", '/ \l\ A:\:l.f {ty ;;;;, .\::. '{~y -;) ... '" "'/ ~ /$}~\J\ lij ~ :.q\.\ ~ "<:: '.', ,..,\ 9: ~,.. "~'1 ~ .~:.> / ~.~. (, \ i.'" ,,'<'" t,:. 'J" f v'\' "' r.' '- ft., c I)f,,:~>; ~~ AX: { ~ {,'/} t'y l5 :.,-:-If f f, 'f -t =<:: ~ .:.:..:./~. .':(,.. CiV:<i: .... /::::~:.:. ''I f, ';. '" t:t:: c:::. '.':' ".{'...,. Llj I...J ;.;.; ,.', ,.{ t\..., llC Il..: (';.",., "f" ~ ;::s f:::~:\f::: ~ ,~;, \.: f' t;, ~ <t' }:.;.;.: '."~, 'f", f \;- ~ ::":';;.:. ,',,' ,( '~ '. f,-.. "t ::.:".:.:. ,n . ~,f; -{ - is" '1 ~ ..... ;.\.:.; ,:).'~"\ t,.' {( lu 1:::\ . - l ':; '\ J . ~" " t.. I. _. \';t.i~';f"j'{f"{J~ ~ \',."/ '(1""""'0::;: :;::> i..' f,!,,,,.. ':'/~. . ~ ""- f:""'-:;'f,fffd'l ~ ..~ '~\!:'::'/:~V':I ~ ~ .~,-z; \ - . ~ , c: . - . "':ii..~ CD _. > .~ ::; i:~ en 5'8~ ci i..: c: 1Il '<: - CD CD c: a c: CI) . o c -"> .., U . - Ii ~- g'Hoj - ~c_, C ..~ c: j!u~, .,.. .!! !f~~ -- C.Sl ~ -O'O~c c .. c ~ - : / ~ ~ ~ A.~ . r i<:- CJ ~ <f .s ~ CJ Z - C -I - ::J. lXli W U - LL LL o ...J (3 - C W ~ :2: ~ :2: '(3 lE '~ a: &3 ...J W I-:- / --- If) -f' Attachment C ".._ _ 7' In-' T Rla%H~~~ENTO CONSTRUCTION CO';M:~TIO~;... t....""~~ i.,.~ i 25 A~ if"'\. -':!b~ ., t''<J' '" aOnSTRUOTIOn @@]OOQll@]OOOO'[JO@][jj] UCENSE NO. 333428 May 19, 1993 Gi;:a Franco City of Chula Vista Engineering Department 476 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 92010 VIA TELECOPIER Re: Adjustment Plat 90.10 Open Space Land Exchange Dear Gina: Per our conversation wherein I requested what you would need to cause an abandonment of this Adjustment Plat request by Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partners, you indicated you had already received such a request from attorney Cynthia Fatica. The request for abandonment would result in a refund of the cash deposit made by Telegraph Canyon Medical Partnership in the amount of $62,660.00. This letter will confirm that it is Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership's desire to abandon this land exchange transaction and obtain the refund. However, Ms. Fatica's letter apparently did not specify to whom the refund was to be made to in this matter, and you were in the process of requesting the City Attorney to review who should be the recipient. The deposit was made by Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership while I was Project Manager for the Partnership. Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership is still the owner of the property which was the subject of the proposed land exchange and the refund of this deposit will allow the Partnership to dissolve and wind up its business. The deposit therefore is to be made to Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership. Attorney Cynthia Fatica will confimi that this is to be the arrangement for the City to refund this deposit which will hopefully not require your office to request an opinion from your City Attorney which could cause delay of the refund. It is the Partnership's desire to obtain this refund and wind up its business as soon as possible. Please notify me when it will be possible for me to pick up and deliver the City's check for this refund so it can be immediately delivered to the Partnership and its 2445 fifth avenue, suite 400. son diego, co 92101.1692. phone (619) 231-3637 · fox (619) 232-4717 /b~9 Gina Franco City of Chula Vista Re: Adjustment Plat 90-10 May 19, 1993 Page 2 dissolution can be completed. Thank you for your assistance and please call me if you have questions in this matter. cc: Cynthia L Fatica Telegraph Canyon Medical Office Partnership /IJ-ILJ Very truly yours, ~O'd COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ SUBMITTED BY: Meeting Date 7/13/93 Resolution I? I ~~ccePting bids and awarding contract for "Library Parking Lot Overlay in the City of Chula Vista, California (LB-126)" Director of Public Works ~ -it City Manager ~.{~(, (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX) ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: At 2:00 p.m. on June 9, 1993, in Conference Room 3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Library Parking Lot Overlay in the City of Chula Vista, California (LB-126)". The work to be done consists of providing asphalt concrete material overlaying the existing parking lot at the Chula Vista Library located at 361 F Street. The overlay is to be 1-1/2 inches thick and in some portions of the lot is to be placed on top of a pavement reinforcing fabric. The work also includes the removal of alligatored pavement areas and replacement with asphalt concrete, restriping of the parking lot, adjustment of water meter boxes and replacement of existing roof drains. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. in the amount of $32,726. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Funds for the overlaying of the parking lot were included in the FY 1992-93 CIP project budget (LB-126). The project was included in the budget to eliminate the present pavement failures and to minimize future maintenance costs. Bids for construction of the project were received from nine contractors as follows: Contractor Bid Amount 1. Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. - San Diego $32,726.00 2. Sim J. Harris Co. - San Diego 33,296.00 3. Southland Paving, Inc. - Escondido 33,880.50 4. Daley Corporation - San Diego 38,155.00 5. Frank & Sons Paving, Inc. - Chula Vista 38,430.10 6. ABC Construction Co., Inc. - San Diego 38,948.50 7. J & S - San Diego 41,193.00 8. Walt's Paving - Chula Vista 42,451.44 9. Angus Asphalt, Inc. - Santee 42,569.90 /I~/ Page 2, Item / I Meeting Date 7/13/93 The low bid by Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. is below the engineer's estimate of $34,865 by $2,139 or 6.1%. Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. of San Diego was formerly the YR. Dennis Corporation. Said company has done numerous paving type work throughout San Diego County over the years. They performed the work on the City's 1991-92 Overlay Project. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Goal The bid document set forth participation requirements per Federal regulations for meeting the Disadvantaged Business and Women Owned Business Goals (DBE). David Harris, Community Development Specialist has reviewed Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P.'s effort to meet the City's DBE participation requirements. His conclusion is that Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. has met the City's DBE goals. Staff has also reviewed Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P.'s eligibility status with regard to Federal procurement programs and the status of Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P.'s State contractor's license. Neither Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. or any listed subcontractors are excluded from Federal procurement programs (list of parties excluded from Federal procurement or non-procurement programs as of June 21, 1992.) Contractor's license for Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. is current and in good standing. Environmental Status The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Replacement or Reconstruction). Disclosure Statement Attached is a copy of the contractor's disclosure statement. Prevailing Wage Statement: The source of funding for this project is Community Development Block Grant funds, which mandates the use of prevailing wages. Prevailing wage scales are those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California, and those determined by the Federal Department of Labor. Both wage ranges were included in the specifications. The Contractor is obligated to pay the higher of the two wage determinations (hourly rate plus fringe benefits) for each applicable craft or classification. //-:( Page 3, Item-.LL Meeting Date 7/13/93 Funds Required for Construction 1. Contract AmOoot $32,726.00 2. Contingencies (approx. 10%) 3,274.00 3. Staff Cost (design & inspection) 8,693.94 T ota! Foods Required for Constrnction $44,693.94 Funds Available for Construction 1. Library Parking Lot Reconstrnction - LB-126 $44,693.94 Total Funds Available for Construction $44,693.94 FISCAL IMPACT: This action would authorize the expenditure of $44,693.94 of previously appropriated funds. After construction, only routine City maintenance amounting mainly to sweeping will be required. File: LB-126 WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\libover.1ay 070793 I/-J / / /-f RESOLUTION NO. 1'lll,tJ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "LIBRARY PARKING LOT OVERLAY IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (LB-126) WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on June 9, 1993, in Conference Room 3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Library Parking Lot Overlay in the city of Chula Vista, California (LB-126)"; and WHEREAS, bids for construction of the project were received from nine contractors as follows: Contractor Bid Amount 1. Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. - San Diego $32,726.00 2. Sim 1. Harris Co. - San Diego 33,296.00 3. Southland Paving, Inc. - Escondida 33,880.50 4. Daley Corporation - San Diego 38,155.00 5. Frank & Sons Paving, Inc. - Chula Vista 38,430.10 6. ABC Construction Co., Inc. - San Diego 38,948.50 7. J & S - San Diego 41,193.00 8. Walt's Paving - Chula Vista 42,451.44 9. Aogus Asphalt, Inc. - Santee 42,569.90 WHEREAS, the low bid by Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. is below the engineer's estimate of $34,865 by $2,139 or 6.1% and Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. of San Diego was formerly the V.R. Dennis corporation, which company has done numerous paving type work throughout San Diego County over the years; and WHEREAS, the bid documents set forth participation requirements per Federal regulations for meeting the Disadvantaged Business and Women Owned Business Goals (DBE) and Superior Ready Mix Concrete has met the city's DBE goals; and WHEREAS, the City'S Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Replacement or Reconstruction). 1 1/- 5' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby accept said nine bids and awards the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P., in the amount of $32,726.00, who has assured the city they can produce an acceptable performance bond. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City council does hereby find that Superior Ready Mix Concrete L.P. has met the city's DBE goals. IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of is hereby authorized and directed t execute said and on behalf of the City. BE Chula vista contract for Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works F:\home\aUomey\libover.lay 2 //~~ to THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all mailers which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and III other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, plicant, cOfltractor. subcontractor, material supplier. tJ 2. If any person* identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% ;tl ~Aration or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. 3. If any person* identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. (V/~ 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ NoL If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matler. r v/t'J 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in "the current or preceding election period? Y es_ No~ If yes, state which Council member(s): * * * (NOTE: Attach additional pages as n~) * * * . )( t>:::: ! 0tL~ Signature of contractor/applicant Date: Print or type name of contractor/applicant ... WM;s defined as: -Any individual,jirm, co-porfMrship,joinr vmtun, asoe/arion. locial club, fraternal organiUJlion, corporation. esUlIe, 1n1S1, receiver, syndicate, lhis IJJ1d any ow.r county, city and country, city municipality, district, or odaer poUtical subdivision, or tiny olher group or combination acting as a ~. n-? ,h!" ii 1-13- J Z b June 23, 1993 TO: Shale Hanson, civil Engineer FROM: David Harris, community Development Specialist CH1 SUBJECT: Library Parking Lot Reconstruction Project I have reviewed the minority and women business enterprise (M/WBE) participation of the low bidder, Superior Ready Mix, and have determined that they have met the city's M/WBE goals of 15% MBE participation and 1% WBE participation. If for any reason Superior Ready Mix finds it necessary to substitute their supplier of pavement reinforcing fabric, then the city should require that the substitute must also be a certified MBE (as the listed supplier makes up the entire 15% MBE). In addition, superior Ready Mix and their listed subcontractors and supplier are all eligible to work on federally-funded projects. cc: Chris Salomone, Community Development Director Cliff Swanson, City Engineer /I-~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item / e2... Meeting Date 7/13/93 Resolution ) 7)" I Accepting bids and awarding contract for the construction of Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue Street Improvements in the City of Chula Vista, CA (ST-151) SUBMITIED BY: Director of Public Works (gli- ')lP leI ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.1iJ At 2:00 p.rn. on June 23,1993, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue Street Improvements" in the City of Chula Vista, CA (ST-151). The work to be done consists of the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, pavement widening, decorated and landscaped medians and traffic safety improvements. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $333,968.00. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission reviewed and approved the proposed improvements on February 26, 1993. Subsequently, on March 24, 1993, the Library Board of Directors also approved these improvements. DISCUSSION: Historical Background The construction of street improvements for Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue along the frontage of the South Chula Vista library was originally budgeted in 1992-1993 with design funding and additional construction funding being added in the FY 1993-94 CIP budget (ST-151). On April 13, 1993, by Resolution No. 17075, the City Council approved the design concept for the subject improvements and on May 11, 1993, by Resolution No. 17109, the City Council approved the establishment of conversion dates from overhead utilities to underground utilities in conjunction with the subj ect proj ecl. Descriotion of Work The subject project includes the construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk, pavement widening, decorated and landscaped medians and traffic safety improvements. Bid Results The project was advertised between May 22 and June 23, 1993. On the bid opening date, bids were received from five contractors as follows in order of the lowest bid first. I~./ Page 2, Item I,) Meeting Date 7/13/93 CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT l. Granite Construction Co., San Diego $333,968.00 2. Superior Ready Mix Concrete, San Diego $341,526.64 3. L.R Hubbard Construction Co., Inc., San Diego $353,404.35 4. 8im J. Harris Company, San Diego $418,594.60 5. ABC Construction Co. $419,609.00 The low.bid received from Granite Construction Company is below the engineer's estimate of$335,058.50 by $1,090.50, or 0.3%. We have reviewed the low bid and recommend awarding the contract to Granite Construction Company. Granite Construction Company is an excellent contractor, they completed the improvement of Main Street from 1-5 to Industrial Boulevard on time and budget and their work was excellent. Attached is a copy of the contractor's Disclosure Statement. General Prevailing Wages This project is funded with TransNet funds for construction. Gas Tax funds were used for the design of the project. Prevailing wage scales as those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California, were determined to be applicable to the work to be done. No special minority or women owned business requirements were necessary or part of the bid documents. This project was advertised prior to the recent Council action adopting an outreach policy for DBE advertising and no special emphasis was placed on that outreach. However, future projects will be advertised with this policy in mind. FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION l. Contract Am01lllt $333,968.00 2. Inspection staff (10%) 33,396.80 3. Contingencies (approx. 8%) 25,635.20 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $393,000.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION l. TransNet, ST-151 $393,000.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $393,000.00 Environmental Status A Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA requirements for this project was prepared in 1989. This document was for the purchase of the property at Orange and Fourth Avenues and development of the site as a library, including the improvement of Orange and Fourth Avenues. Subsequently, an addendum to the Negative Declaration for utilization of the site as a library under Case No. IS-89-79A was filed with the County Clerk's office. The Negative Declaration and the addendum concluded no significant environmental impact. /1....;.. Page 3, Item I).. Meeting Date 7/13/93 FISCAL IMPACT: This action would authorize the expenditure of $393,000 of previously appropriated funds. After construction, only routine City maintenance amounting mainly to street sweeping will be required. SA:AX125-D WPC F:\home\engineer\agenda\fourimp.con 1,),-;) //1--+ RESOLUTION NO. /,)/~I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ORANGE AVENUE AND FOURTH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (ST-151) WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on June 23, 1993, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue street Improvements" in the City of Chula Vista, CA (ST- 151); and WHEREAS, the Safety Commission reviewed and approved the proposed improvements on February 26, 1993 and on March 24, 1993, the Library Board of Directors also approved these improvements; and WHEREAS, bids were received from five contractors as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1- Granite Construction Co., San Dieoo $333,968.00 2. Superior Ready Mix Concrete, San Diego $341,526.64 3. L.R. Hubbard Construction Co., Inc. , San $353,404.35 Diego 4. Sim J. Harris Comoany, San Dieao $418,594.60 5. ABC Construction Co. $419,609.00 WHEREAS, the low bid received from Granite construction company is below the engineer's estimate of $335,058.50 by $1,090.50, or 0.3% and staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding the contract to Granite construction company; and WHEREAS, this project will be funded by the Gas Tax and TransNet funds and prevailing wage scales as those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California, were determined to be applicable to the work to be done with no special minority or women owned business requirements being necessary or part of the bid documents; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration pursuant to CEQA requirements for this project was prepared in 1989 which document was for the purchase of the property at Orange and Fourth Avenues 1 /,2 ---.5 and development of the site as a library, including the improvement of orange and Fourth Avenues; and WHEREAS, subsequently, an addendum to the Negative Declaration for utilization of the site as a library under Case No. IS-89-79A was filed with the county Clerk's'office and the Negative Declaration and the addendum concluded no significant environmental impact. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby accept said five bids and awards the contract for the construction of Orange Avenue and Fourth Avenue street improvements in the City of Chula vista to Granite Construction Company in the amount of $333,968.00, who has assured the city that they can produce an acceptable performance bond. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista. John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works Presented by F:\home\attomey\fourimp.cOll 2 ),). -I, THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of alt persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g.. owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. Granite Construction Company 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. Granite Construction Incorporated 3. If any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. 4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ NoJL. If yes, please indicate person(s): 5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. Kurt Kniffin, Asst. Branch Manager Jack Shewmaker, Asst, Branch Mnager 6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the current or preceding election period? Yes_ N02 If yes, state which Council member(s): . , '(NOTE: Attach additional pages Dme: June 16,1993 Signature of contractor/applicant R.C. Allbritton, Vice President Print or type name of contractor/applicant * fHlQ!! is defined as: ~Any individual, firm. co-partnership, joint \Jenture, association. social club, fraternal organization. corporation, estate, trust, receivu, syndicate. this and any other county, city and country, city municipality, district, or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a -' /~~7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT REVIEWED BY: Item 13 Meeting Date 7/13/93 Resolution I? I ".2.. Approving agreement between the San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC) and City of Chula Vista for unified telephone information system Director of Public Works ~ , " City Manager &~ )1.., (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X) ::s.' ITEM TITLE: SUBMITIED BY: On July 19, 1980, the South Coast Organization Operating Transit (SCOOT) entered into an agreement with San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC) for regional transit information service. This service provides Chula Vista Transit (CVT) riders with information on CVT schedules and routes, and on other fixed route transit systems in San Diego County including San Diego Transit and the Trolley. Since SCOOT was dissolved on July 1, 1993, the agreement for this service this fiscal year will be between the City of Chula Vista and SDTC. This agreement continues CVT participation in the regional service for FY 1993-94 at a cost of $22,766, a 7.6% increase over the FY 1992-93 cost of $21,146. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt resolution approving agreement between San Diego Transit Corporation and City of Chula Vista for unified telephone information system. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The following transit operators participate in the regional telephone information system operated by SDTC: San Diego Trolley, North County Transit District, SDTC, County Transit Suburban, CVT, and National City Transit. Chula Vistans receive transit information on all systems operating in the County. The service is available 7 days a week between the hours of approximately 5:30 a.m. and 11:00 p.m. Under the FY 1993-94 agreement, SDTC estimates that the City's share of systemwide 1,853,663 calls will be 45,275, or 2.44%, about the same as the current year. The average cost per call is about $0.50 ($22,766 + 45,275 calls). The total estimated SDTC information system cost for next fiscal year is $933,051, a 7.6% increase compared with the current fiscal year cost of $866,644. According to SDTC, this cost increase is due partially to capital investment in the new computerized telephone information and trip planning system that was installed this fiscal year. This updated component to the system has resulted in a 20 % increase in the number of calls processed by the regional information system. FISCAL IMPACT: The City's prorated share of the FY 1993-94 total regional telephone information system cost is estimated at $22,766 (2.44% x 933,051). The cost of this service is included in the FY 1993- 94 Transit Division budget account 402-4020-5211 (Advertising), which is funded by Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 4.0 funds. WMG:DS-035 WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEER\BIlLG\sdtcphon.agm 13'/ RESOLUTION NO. / 7/~.2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION (SDTC) AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR UNIFIED TELEPHONE INFORMATION SYSTEM, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME WHEREAS, on July 19, 1980, the South Coast organization operating Transit (SCOOT) entered into an agreement with San Diego Transit Corporation (SDTC) for regional transit information service; and WHEREAS, this service provides Chula vista Transit (CVT) riders with information on CVT schedules and routes, and on other fixed route transit systems in San Diego county including San Diego Transit and the Trolley; and WHEREAS, since SCOOT will be dissolved on July 1, 1993, the city, who is contracting directly with another provider to continue the bus services, desires the continuation of this phone service next fiscal year; and WHEREAS, this agreement continues CVT participation in the regional telephone information service for FY 1993-94 at a cost of $22,766, a 7.6% increase over the FY 1992-93 cost of $21,146. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve an Agreement between the San Diego Transit corporation (SDTC) and the city of Chula vista for Unified Telephone Information System, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula 'sta. John Lippitt, Director of Public Works i Presented by F:\home\attomey\TelInfo.SDT J 3'.2./ /3-3 San Diego Transit ~ An Operator In the Metropolitan Transit System ~ 100 16th Street P.O. Box 2511 San Diego, CA 92112 (619) 238-0100 FAX (619) 696-8159 June 17, 1993 Mr. Bill Gustafson City of Chula Vista 707 F Street Chula Vista, California 91910 Dear Bill: Enclosed are two copies of the Telephone Information Agreement for Fiscal Year 1994 with the changes and additions you requested. When this agreement has been fully executed, please return one copy for our file. If you have any questions regarding this agreement, feel free to contact me. Sincerely, C~lfer Controller CT/dd Enclosures (2) / :J -:3 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION AND CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR UNIFIED TELEPHONE INFORMATION SYSTEM THIS AGREEMENT is made between the SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION, hereinafter called "SDTC", and the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, hereinafter called "City". RECITALS WHEREAS, City operates Chula Vista Tran- sit (CVT), a fixed-route bus system; and WHEREAS, SDTC has jointly in the past maintained a Transportation Information System providing information to telephone callers about CVT operations and relating to fare, route and other operational information; and WHEREAS, such a relationship has benefited both SDTC and City in terms of effectiveness and efficiency; and WHEREAS, SDTC and City desire to continue this relationship. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals and the mutual obligation of the parties set forth herein, SDTC and City agree as follows: SECTION 1. JOINT USE OF SDTC SYSTEM A. SDTC agrees to continue using its telephone information system (TIS) to disseminate rider information by telephone relating to CVT routes, trip times, fares, and other operational information which is currently disseminated by the joint TIS, and any other type information which the parties hereto may in the future mutually agree as being appropriate for dissemination through the joint TIS. B. SDCT agrees to purchase or lease any additional equipment or telephone services necessary for an expansion of the TIS, and agrees to hire and be solely responsible for any additional employees necessitated by the expansion. C. All necessary steps shall be taken by SDTC so that during the term of this agreement and any extensions thereof City residents will have accurate and fast telephone information system providing operational information relating to public transportation in the San Dieg~jegion. 1:]-7 Agreement Between the San Oiego Transit Corp. and City of Chula Vista Page 2 O. Whenever the City amends its fare schedule, or changes routes, trip times or other aspects of operations, SOTC agrees to update the TIS so that the changed operational information is disseminated to telephone callers within five (5) days after SOTC is notified of such changes by the City. SECTION 2. OBLIGATIONS OF CITY City agrees to pay to SOTC the sum of twenty-two thousand, seven hundred sixty-six dollars ($22,766) in return for the use of its Telephone Information System (TIS) to disseminate rider information by telephone during FY94. The calculation of the $22,766 is shown on the Exhibit A attached to this agreement. This calculation is based upon the number of calls received for each agency from July 1989 to February 1992. This will be the base percentage through FY95. Payment for this sum shall be made on a monthly basis no later than ten (10) days after receipt of invoice from SDTC. Payment for each month shall be the amount of one thousand, eight hundred ninety-seven dollars and seventeen cents ($1,897.17). SECTION 3. INDEMNIFICATION A. City agrees to indemnify and save free and harmless SOTC and its authorized agents, officers and employees against acts or omissions caused by City, its agents or employees, and any cost and expenses incurred on account of any claim therefore, and SOTC agrees to indemnify and save free and harmless the City and its authorized representatives, officers and employees against acts or omissions caused by SOTC, its agents or employees, and any costs or expenses incurred on account of any claim therefore. B. City, its agents, officers and employees, shall not be held liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines or for damage to any goods, properties or effects of any person whatsoever, nor for personal injuries to or death of them, or any of them, caused by or resulting from any negligent acts or omissions of SOTC, or its agents, employees or representatives, not including liability by reason of acts of omissions caused by the City, its agents, or employees; and SOTC, its agents, officers and employees, shall not be held liable for any claims, liabilities, penalties, fines or for damage to any goods, properties, or effects of any person whatsoever, nor for personal injuries to or death of them, or any of them, caused by or resulting from any negligent acts or omissions of City, or its agents, employees or representatives, not including liability by reason of acts or omissions caused by SOTC, its agents or employees. /3~ Agreement Between the San Diego Transit Corp. and City of Chula Vista Page 3 SECTION 4. CONFLICT OF INTEREST A. No officer, employee or agent of hereto have, nor shall they have, interest, direct or indirect in this either of the parties any personal financial agreement. B. Interest of City and Emplovees. City covenants that City, its officers or employees presently have no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in property, either real or personal, which would conflict in any manner or degree with the performance of the obligations hereunder. SDTC covenants that SDTC, its officers or employees presently have no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, in any manner or degree with the performance of the obligations hereunder. SECTION 5. AUDIT At any time during normal business hours and as reasonably necessary, SDTC shall make available to City for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this agreement and will permit City to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts of such records, and to perform audit procedures as deemed necessary with respect to all invoices, payrolls, equipment, materials and other data relating to matters covered by this agreement. SECTION 6. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR SDTC is, for all purposes arising out of this agreement, an independent contractor, and no employee of SDTC is, for any. purpose arising out of this agreement, an employee of City. SECTION 7. TERM OF AGREEMENT AND TERMINATION A. This agreement shall become effective at 12:01 a.m. on July 1, 1993 and shall expire at 12:00 midnight on June 30, 1994, unless previously terminated as provided herein, or unless extended by written agreement prior to such expiration data. B. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon ninety (90) days written notice. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice if the other party fails to meet or fulfill its obligation or violates any of the covenants or agreement set forth in this Agreement. In the event of termination, payment will be prorated for the period of time SDTC actually provided the service. 13"''' Agreement Between the San Diego Transit Corp. and City of Chula Vista Page 4 SECTION 8. AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENT This Agreement may be amended at any time by mutual written agreement of the parties hereto. SECTION 9. NONASSIGNABILITY SDTC shall not assign any interest in this Agreement and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of the City thereto. SECTION 10. WHEN RIGHTS AND REMEDIES NOT WAIVED In no event shall any payment by City hereunder constitute or be construed to be a waiver by City of any breach of conditions or any default which may then exist, or while any such breach or default shall exist, in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with respect to such breach or default. SECTION 11. SEVERABILITY OF PROVISIONS Both the City and SDTC shall be in compliance with all Equal Opportunity and Affirmative action laws in connection with the performance of this agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement is executed by SDTC and the City, pursuant to authorizing resolutions. SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY ~, Roger S ble PRESIDENT & GENERAL MANAGER BY MAYOR DATE (,-/'53 DATE ATTEST: J J"? FORMY EXHIBIT A SAN DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORATION FISCAL YEAR 1994 TELEPHONE CONTRACTS PROPOSED FY94 FY94 FY93 FY93 CALLS % COST % COST CHULA VISTA 45,275 2.44% $ 22,766 2.44% $ 21,146 COUNTY 103,897 5.60% 52,251 5.60% 48,532 MTDB Service Route 932 15,721 .85% 7,931 .85% 7,366 Routes 933-34 10,905 .59% 5,505 .59% 5,113 and Various Night Service STRAND 24,531 1. 32% 12,316 1.32% 11,440 NATIONAL CITY 26,887 1. 45% 13,529 1. 45% 12,566 NORTH COUNTY 315,769 17.03% 158,899 17.03% 147,590 SDTC 1,142,952 61.67% 575,413 61.67% 534,460 TROLLEY 167 , 726 9.05% 84,441 9.05% 78,431 TOTAL 1,853,663 100.00% $933,051 100.00% $866,644 --------- ------- -------- ------- -------- --------- ------- -------- ------- -------- J3'F" COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1'1 Meeting Date 7/13/93 SUBMITTED BY: Report proposed debt settlement between Ogden Environmental and Energy Services and Baldwin vista Associates regarding the otay Ranch Deputy city M~er Krempl Gll city Manager27 (4/5ths Vote: Yes___ NO-X-> ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: Ogden Environmental and Energy Services ("ogden") has been retained as the chief preparer of and responder to comments for the Otay Ranch ErR. odgen's participation is critical in the otay Ranch entitlement approval process that is now occuring before the Council and the Board. However, Baldwin has fallen behind in payments for services due to Ogden, and Ogden has refused to continue to provide its consultation services without, at a minimum, security that it will get paid.Y Negotiations have been ongoing over the last 30 days to arrive at an acceptable payment schedule to eliminate the debt and security therefore. A tentative agreement of business terms has been reached just prior to the deadline for printing this agenda, and time has not permitted the articulation and execution of a full written agreement to accompany this report. Yet, the matter is critical to resolve so as not to delay the otay Ranch Project approval process now scheduled with public hearings. Therefore, the purpose of this report is to request council to delegate the authority to the City Manager to execute an agreement that is consistent with the business terms outlined in this report. RECOMMENDATION: That Council authorize the city Manager to negotiate and execute an agreement with Baldwin vista and Ogden Environmental consistent with the business terms outlined in this report, and to provide Council a copy of same as an informational item when executed. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: None applicable. 1. Staff views this as a reasonable position. 11/-/ Item Meeting Date 7/13/93 Page 2 )'1 BACKGROUND: Ogden Environmental is under contract to the city, with the City's liability limited to the otay Ranch Trust Fund (funded by Baldwin) to prepare the Environmental Impact Report for the otay Ranch. In fact, the final draft EIR waS prepared in December 1992 and is pending before the city council and County Board of Supervisors. As part of the process, ogden had voluntarily agreed to defer submitting billings for some of their services with the idea that they would be brought fully up to date before final project action by the council and Board of Supervisors. Their current contract calls for them to receive $50,000 on the first and fifteenth of each month until paid up. Baldwin has been missing payments or only making partial payments over the past few months. As of July 1, 1993, Ogden is owed about $370,000. They did receive two $25,000 payments in the month of June. It is estimated, however, that by the time the project is approved by the policy makers, they will be owed a total of $400,000 to $500,000 including interest. DISCUSSION: As mentioned, Ogden, Baldwin and the City have been in discussions on the debt payments and have reached a tentative agreement at the staff level just prior to the Agenda printing deadline. The business terms of the agreement calls for the following: 1. Baldwin shall deposit for the payment of Ogden, and City will pay from that deposit, all principal and interest due and payable on or before the earliest of the following occurrence: a. The date upon which the city and county vote to grant or deny final approval of the otay Ranch Project; b. The date which is five business days after the date upon which Baldwin receives certain funding it is pursuing from outside sources; or c. August 16, 1993. 2. The obligation to make the payment continues to be limited to the assets of the otay Ranch Trust Fund. However, the Trust Fund will be supplemented by additional security in the form of a note secured by a Trust Deed in the total amount of the )'I-~ Item Meeting Date 7/13/93 Page 3 Ii expected unpaid bills, and a performance Trust Deed issued to the City of Chula vista against approximately 401 acres of certain real property on the otay Ranch Property located south of Telegraph Canyon Road shown in the attached Exhibit A~If payment is not made per No. I above, then the city would foreclose on the property in order to make sure Ogden is paid in full. This agreement calls for Baldwin to make full payment of all amounts due with interest within 5 weeks (August 16, 1993) at the latest. This is fully the expectation, if not sooner, on everyone's part. If Baldwin fails to perform this or any other obligation of the Trust Fund, as stated, the City can foreclose on certain Baldwin assets on the Ranch to make payment. One of staff's potential concerns was the situation of having property within the otay Ranch as security and the perception that Ogden's testimony and facts could be biased somehow on the project. Staff and the city Attorney have arrived at mitigation stipulations to remove that doubt and assure an objective process. First, ogden would be totally removed from the foreclosure process and not have any ability to benefit beyond the debt owed them. This is because the city would be the party foreclosing on the debt and paying Ogden. (This is similar to the arrangement the city already has in a contract with another consultant, RBF.) Second, there would be a large loan to value ratio, not greater than 55%, insuring a much greater property equity than the amount of the debt. Third, and perhaps most important, the appraised value of the security would be based solely on existing General Plan Designations and Zoning and not on any additional land use entitlements being given by the Council and Board as a part of the otay Ranch deliberations. This eliminates the argument that there would be any motive to increase density on the property through the hearing process. A final point is that the city would go against assets in the Trust Account first, then assets represented by the security Baldwin has provided previously (3 model houses in North county) and then, and only then, the Ranch property security. As mentioned, the security is only a fall back if payment is not made by August 16, 1993. Baldwin fully anticipates that payment will be made. The city's general fund is not at risk for making any payments, only the Baldwin Company and the assets in the /l/"3 *- NOT SCANNED I:'/:;J ~,;,,"'/' !. '; S,' }~< Item Meeting Date 7/13/93 Page 4 /L.j otay Ranch Trust Fund, and the security provided would be available to pay Ogden's debt. EIR Consultation Agreements have been authorized in the Purchasing Procedures Manual to be approved administratively by the city Manager. However, because this is in the nature of a settlement agreement, and not in the nature of the original consulation agreement, staff is requesting authorization to articulate and execute a three party agreement between the City, Baldwin vista and Ogden Environmental and Energy Services which incorporates these business terms of settlement. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City except city Attorney and staff time to prepare the agreement and implementing documents. All payments will be made to ogden from the trust account monies which Baldwin has deposited with the City. 1'1"',-/ <:t: t- -..... ~ ~ ":i::: it .. - .. CD o ... o ~ II) ::i (II) :::! . II f/). 4D ..J ~!. w 4g- ~"'Hii COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item 15 Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Report Providing an update on status of implementation and impacts of AB 408 (Decriminalization of Parking citations) This item has been pulled and is provided separately as an information item. ;5;/ COUNCIL AGENOA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item 16 Meeting Oate 07/13/93 Public Hearing - Amending the 1993-94 Budget to Account for Revenue Reduct ions from the State of Ca 1 iforni a 1E..S"t'. ) 7 J 1,..3 City Manage~ 4/5ths Vote: Yes-X- No___> On June 15, 1993, the City Council adopted the 1993-94 operating budget with the understanding that the budget would be revisited after the State adopted its budget and the impact of the State revenue cuts on the City were known. At the same time, a hiring freeze was imposed, except for certain public safety pos it ions. At that meet i ng, the Counc i 1 reaff i rmed the three goa 1 s of (1) no service level reductions, (2) avoid layoffs, and (3) no additional use of General Fund reserves. SUBMITTED BY: Based on the final adopted version of the State Budget, our anticipated net loss of revenue is $540,000. This amount is based on a reduction in "AB 8" property tax funds of $1,267,000. In order to offset this hit, local governments will receive additional one-time funding of $396,000 which will be made available from $130 million in State Transit Planning and Development Funds transferred to the Department of Motor Vehicles' Vehicle License Fees account, and $331,000 which will be the City's portion of the continuation of the half cent sales tax. At this stage we are anticipating that the half cent sales tax will be approved by voters in November. Should this not be the case, we will return to you at that time if our revenues will not be sufficient to cover expenditures. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the revised budget and eliminate the hiring freeze. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A. BACKGROUND: The City Manager and the Budget Manager have worked closely with all Department Heads to prepare several alternative cost reduction strategies depending on the possible revenue reductions being discussed by the State Legislature and the Governor. The process of developing these cuts continues to be very collaborative. Initial cut lists of 2%, 5% and 10% were prepared by each department as part of their 1993-94 budget preparation process. These cuts were discussed in detail during the budget review process and, in some cases, portions of the cuts were included in the adopted 1993-94 budget in order to balance with our available revenues. As we have received more information on the State Budget process, we have continued to work with departments to refine the proposed cut lists. Once the final cut of $540,000 was known, meetings were held with all affected department heads to once again review the proposed lists, discuss operational impacts and agree on the most feasible cuts for each department. In addition, I have been conducting a series of meetings at various locations throughout the Civic Center in an attempt to reach as many employees as possible to discuss the implications of the State's actions on our budget. 1 IJ; , I Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 Also, at the time the budget was adopted on June 15, Council took action to approve in concept the Mayor's recommendations with a report back from staff on these recommendations, as well as any recommendations staff may have. The maker of the motion clarified at the meeting that she wanted the staff, according to the minutes, "...to look at the recommended cuts and respond to them, but also have staff provide any additional information. If staff disagreed with those cuts, that was fine, but she wanted those recommendat ions as we 11." Th i s report attempts to meet this Council direction. The collaborative review process of the budget was an effort to look at tpe big picture and see where reductions could occur without having a negative impact on service levels to the public, causing layoffs or reducing the City's Genera~ Fund reserves. After comp 1 et i ng that rev i ew process, the amount recommended for reduction compared to what was proposed by the Mayor is larger than was originally proposed in two cases, and less in two cases. The point, as the Mayor had correctly anticipated when he made his proposals, was that the size of the overall budget cuts by the State, which were unknown when he made his proposals, could mean that the City must look at cuts broadly throughout the organization. Specifically, the Mayor's proposals and what is recommended to be modified in this budget, are contained in the following chart. Department/Function Mavor's Proposal Manaqer's Recommendation Administration Mgmt. Info. Servo Planning Public Works (Eng.) $ 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 $ 61,052 46,231 8,830 59,076 In Management and Information Services, there was already $57,000 taken out of th i s budget in the 1993-94 budget wh i ch has a 1 ready been adopted. With the additional amount that is recommended to be reduced, this department takes by far the largest hit of any department, i.e., an 11% reduction in its overall budget. This can be accomplished, I believe, without negatively impacting general operations of the City. Also, this does not mean this department was "fat" but basically, as described in the detail below, is a matter of deferring certain costs until later, and also in terms of the already adopted budget, backfilling a fu ll-t ime Systems and Procedures Manager wi th part-t ime hours in order to provide needed functions in the City. In the case of the Planning Department, it was difficult to find reductions in expenses that did not negat i ve ly impact either the revenue flow and/or the workload of the department. Also, as you know, as a back-up to funding the Youth Action Program, the percentage of work that is fee supported was increased in order to fund that program as a back-up to my efforts to obtain private sector support for the Youth Action program. That effort is still not yet resolved, but obviously the percentage for fee supported projects could be increased even more if there is a desire to reach a certain guideline. But the overall point is that the workload at the department is still very strong, since there are a number of 2 I ~ --~ Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 projects be i ng eva 1 uated with i n that department and given the fact that developers, even though we are in a recession, are attempting to get development approvals so they will be poised to develop their property once the recession is over. RECOMMENDED GENERAL FUND BUDGET REDUCTIONS Included in Chart 1 on the following page are the recommended expenditure reductions for the City's General Fund. This chart contains in the first column the department or function, followed by the approved 1993-94 budget for that department or function. The next column is the base budget, which has General Fund impacts, from which the proposed reductions would come. For example, in Public Works (Engineering), there is an overall budget of $5,285,130, but only $1,164,522 requires General Fund support. So, the reduction from that budget is based on the lower amount. The remainder of that budget is supported by fees and other revenues so that a reduction in expenditures would at best only mean a corresponding reduction in revenue. At worst it would actually mean a reduction of revenue to the General Fund, especially for those revenues based on a full- cost recovery factor. PERSONNEL CHANGES The personnel changes reflected in these cuts include freezing a Plan Checker and Building Inspector position in Building and Housing for six months, freezing one Tree Trimmer in Public Works, freezing a half-time Intern in Engineering, deferring for six months the hiring of a secretary in Administration and an Administrative Office Assistant in Public Works Operations, delaying hiring an Engineering Aide until April 1, 1994 and an Engineering Tech in Engineering until January 1994, deleting a .25 clerical position in the Library, and transferring a .2 FTE Sr. Management Assistant in Administration and a .2 Administrative Analyst II in Management and Information Services to Community Development. In addition, it is proposed that the .7 FTE Environmental Program Manager in Community Development be made a full-time position. This position was at a .7 FTE to accommodate the incumbent in this job, who is now moving out of the area. It is felt that to obtain someone of a comparable quality to fill this position, it will need to be a full-time position. DEPARTMENTAL CUTS Presented below are the more detailed descriptions of the proposed expenditure reductions. It should be pointed out that in some cases, instead of an expenditure cut, there is a revenue figure included as well. Since it has the same positive effect in counteracting the loss of $540,000 in revenue from the State, both expenditure reductions and new revenues are included in the description of each department's efforts to balance the revenue loss from the State. 3 /~'3 0:1' ~ en I- :) U C W C Z w :'!: :'!: o U W II: tfl II: W o <( z <( :'!: I/,'" CHART 1 <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- <P- co 0 0 0'> 0 0 0 ..... co 0'> 0 M Il) Il) 0 ..... M 0'> ..... 0'> ..... - O'! q q co q q q ~ co ~ q CC! o::r M ~ ..... "': "': 0 C'! C'! ::J c? .:; Lri . Lri 0 o::r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 C\I ..... <P- C\I 0 0 0 0 0 0 M 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 o::r co 0 0 co M Il) Il) 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0'> 0'> 0 C\I ..... 0 C\I M M 0 ..... co M 0 Oft 0 q M CICt COft ..... ..... C'I!, .....ft CICt Oft 0 ~ Oft ft tIS ft 0; 0 - ..... C\I Il) M Il) CD 0 C\I 0 co C\I 0:1' 0 0 ~ co Il) 0 0 M C\I o::r ..... C\I ..... 0 M Il) co 0:1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 Il) ... 0 0 0:1' ~ It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co 0 ..... 0 C\I C\I ..... C\I M 0 Il) 0 C\I 0'> co o::r co 0 co 0'> o::r M Il) 0 o::r C\I Il) ..... CI) III C't Il) ~ M Il) Oft CICt CICt ..... o::r COft Ilt CICt co o::t 0'> C\lft ~ Il) O'!. C't III Tii co cD 0 tIS tIS 0 co ..... C\I c? M ..... ..... tIS ..... o::rft ..... o::r ~ ..... co CU :.J C\I Il) C\I M co C\I 0 o::r ..... co co 0 M co ..... ..... ..... ..... co C\I co 1rI C\lft 0 0 M co M M C\lft C'I!, 0'>_ ..... ..... 0_ ..... 0:1'_ 0'> C'I!, CO_ ..... CICt co - - ..... ..... 0 0 0 ..... ..... co 0 M ..... 0 o::r 0 ..... co ..... C\I ~ ::J CI) U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 o::r Cl 0 0 't:l ... ::J 0 1rI u. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tii C\I M 0 Il) 0 C\I 0'> co co Q) 0 Il) Q) ot Il) Il) Il) o::r C") Q) ..... CI) M_ Ilt ~ M Ilt q CICt CICt co ..... ~ ~ CICt co ..... O'!. C't co ..... CO_ CICt tIS 0 ft - ~ Lri' ~ co co 0 co 0 co ..... C\I M Il) ..... co ..... o::r 0 C\I co C\I Il) C\I M co C\I 0 o::r Q) ..... co ot M co ..... ..... Il) ..... co ..... Il) 0:1' CI) C'I!, 0 0 M co M M C'I!, M q ..... C't q ..... Q) Q) O'!. ~ C\I C'I!, Q) Q) II: - 0 0 0 ft 0 0 ~ 0 Lri' ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... M ..... ..... co co it - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 Il) ~ 0 0 't:l ::J 1rI - III III C CI) C c & .2 0 III III :s g .2 E c 't:l .!!! CI) CU 0 0 en c E CI) - E III ~ - :; Z a.. ::J 0 ::J > C W 0 U. c E ... 0 CI) en CI) CI) .2 a.. ~ c E ~ III - 0 :I: ... cu ~ - ~ 0 (.) ~ - U '(3 t: ... cu ~ c - CI) ... ... CI) c - ~ 0 ... .- ... ~ c CI) ! II: CI) c i ~ c g ... c (.) - g ;: 0 ::J C CI) III ::J a! .!! 0 ::J CI) C ~ ~ CI) ~ c 0 c 't:l E .- u u E (.) cu C .- CI) (.) ,~ c - III 0 c 'I .- :2 ... cu ~ .~ .- - E ... E ~ ~ ~ E cu ::J I ~ III C 2i cu cu CI) ... c ,Q ,- C III ,Q ... ... .!!! - - 't:l 0 0 ::J 0 ... 0 cu CI) 0 ::J ::J t:- oe:( 1rI U 1rI U U U U u: u. c :.J :E z 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. 0.. - o ~ ~ ~ Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 Administration The major expenditure reductions/revenues in this function are as follows: Shift of Senior Management Assistant one day a week from Administration to Community Development. Instead of shifting this expenditure over to Community Development, this assistance to Community Development is treated as net revenue from the Redevelopment Agency. Tpis is more beneficial and has a more positive impact on the General Fund. This means $18,019 from Redevelopment to the General Fund. Currently the third clerical position in Administration is vacant, and it is proposed that this position be filled with part-time hours for at least six months, and the position being permanently filled January 1. It is expected that this would save $15,000 this year. Anticipated salary savings for Voluntary Time Off (VTO), including one of the Principal Management Assistants taking voluntary time off without pay is expected to save the department $15,738. Both water districts have expressed interest in having articles on water conservation and other water issues included in the Chula Vista Quarterly. At a minimum, it appears that the City would receive at least $6,000 in revenue for the newsletter, which expense is included in the Administration accounts. The remainder of the cuts in this department come from miscellaneous reductions in travel, publications, membership and equipment maintenance. Buildinq and Housinq It is proposed in Building and Housing, because of the slowdown in construction, that one Building Inspector and one Plan Checker be frozen for six months, at a savings of $52,000. Community Development It is proposed that $5,093 in miscellaneous cuts be taken from printing and binding, postage, memberships, telephone, office supplies, books and overtime accounts. The main issue presented by the Community Development Department is how to handle lThe concept of this shift was already approved by the City Council, but had not yet been ref 1 ected in the City budget, so it is be i ng placed in the Administration account at this time. 4 /"..5" . Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 the cutbacks of revenue from the State for the Redevelopment Agency, which will be another $230,000 in addition to the $540,000 that will be lost by the General Fund. Currently, the staff is looking at various options which could be utilized to basically "pay back" this money next Spring. Possible sources of this funding wou 1 d be the pay back s from commerc i all oans to the City, the property tax recovery the Agency expects to receive as a result of the Katz Hollis study, or possibly from the Otay Valley Road Widening Assessment District. These options are going to be analyzed in a more complete report presented to the City Council sitting as the Redevelopment Agency. Finance A fairly small reduction is proposed in Finance of $8,390. This is anticipated from known savings from the VTO policy ($5,250), plus miscellaneous reductions in hourly wages, overtime, and travel. Fire The Acting Fire Chief supports the reduction in the fire budget of $38,890. One part of the cut is $9,740 for professional services. This entails renegotiating the physical fitness contract for the Fire Department. Last year this service cost $19,000, but the Acting Chief feels that basically the same service can be achieved for a flat rate of $10,000. This is because many of these types of businesses are facing a loss of customers in a very competitive business climate and are willing to considerably reduce their rates. It is proposed that the overtime account be reduced by $8,000. It is anticipated that this will only affect some employee meetings requiring overtime, which will be more of an issue of committee size and the frequency of meetings. Other than that, all the other cuts come from a variety of miscellaneous accounts, i nc 1 ud i ng trave 1, book s, other commod i ties, other contractua 1 serv ices, wearing apparel and printing. The other commodities account reduction ($2,500) reflects the fact that the department bought hose for Station No. 6 in 1992-93 and not as much hose will be required for 1993-94. However, this account would need an increase in 1994-95 so that ongoing purchase of replacement hose wi 11 not be hampered. In any case, the Acting Chief feels that more scrutiny on spending and doing a better job of tracking accounts will enable him to better manage the budget to stay within these budget constraints. Librarv In a series of comprehensive meetings involving Library staff, budget reductions of up to $130,000 were identified. One cost saving measure would reduce the number of overdue notices from two to one (which is not recommended), and the combination of Children's and Adult circulation desks. Whi le this latter 5/I,.,t, . I tern 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 proposa 1 may have some mer it, it is dec i ded in th i s budget proposa 1 to defer consideration of that idea until further evaluation of this concept can be made. In any case, the amount of cuts in the Library budget has been decreased to a proposed reduct ion of $25,820. The ch i ef elements of th i s reduct ion i nc 1 ude eliminating a .25 clerical position in Library Administration (this is over and above the current full-time positions) in that office. This position has been vacant since last Fall and in the view of the Acting Director, the department can live without this position and that it will not impact service levels. The other major reduction is $13,900 in the acquisition of circulating books. The loss of books that would occur as a result of this account reduction will be more than offset by the additional books which are being acquired for the EastLake branch library, which of course will be part of the overall book collection of the City. A 11 the other reduct ions are bas i ca lly sma 11 mi see 11 aneous reduct ions in a number of Library accounts, which the Acting Director feels the Library can absorb without negatively impacting service levels to Library patrons. Manaqement and Information Services It is proposed that this budget be reduced by another $46,231. As was pointed out earlier, the initial budget proposal to the City Council already recommended a cut of $57,000, i.e., the replacement of the Systems and Procedures Manager, with part-time hours. The overall impact on this department is an 11% reduction in the budget. The major expenditure reductions (and/or revenues) are listed below: The use of the Administrative Analyst II one day a week in Redevelopment waS approved in concept by the City Counc i land is ref 1 ected as new revenue from the Redevelopment Agency in the amount of $14,705. Again, it works better to the advantage of the General Fund to take this as revenue from the Redevelopment Agency, rather than just transferring the expense for the one day a week from one function to the other. It is proposed that computer maintenance contracts be delayed or reduced by $12,000, and that the purchase of a software package which will increase the productivity of the mainframe computer programmers and which wi 11 f ac i 1 itate the i nterf ace between ma i nframe programmi ng and microcomputer programming be de 1 ayed by four months, sav ing another $5,000. It is also expected that known VTO savings will amount to $3,071, that the overtime account be reduced by $3,200 and the professional services account by $3,000. It is proposed that $6,240 be eliminated in hourly wages, which would be to eliminate extra part-time hours that would be otherwise utilized when Word Processing is very busy. Other than a $1,200 reduction in travel, the remainder of the cost cuts in this 6 /~ -? Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 I department are mi sce 11 aneous reduct ions to book s, telephone , postage, other commodities and office supplies. Parks & Recreation , The initial list of proposed expenditure reductions in Parks & Recreatibn was $82, 694. Th i s was reduced, however, to $22,224 in order to make sur1' that service levels to the community were not affected. For example, the propo al to eliminate contractual rodent services at the parks ($7,500) was deleted fr m the cut list in order that those services can continue to be provided, wh ch is particularly critical to parks such as Rohr and Greg Rogers. Fairly! large reduct ions to accounts for 1 andscape supp 1 i es and mater i a 1 for ma i ntil i n i ng buildings as well as janitorial supplies was reduced significantly to an rmount which will provide sufficient funds for these purposes in park maintenance. The major change in this department is moving a portion of the Graphic Artist cost as well as part of the expenditure for producing the recreation broch~re to the trust funds. These moves reduced the impact on the General Fund by $10,610, which is slightly less than half of the total amount removed from the department budget. In reality, the actual reduction in budget accounts for this department is only $11,614. Personnel It is proposed that this department be reduced by $10,736. This would amount to a $4,503 reduction in training, with the idea of using the training offic~r and the Assistant Personnel Director to do more training in house, as well as!doing a better job of obtaining free training where available, or more two-for-one offers through the Regional Training Center. There is also going to be an effort to combine ads for jobs, with a projected reduction in advertising of $2,420. It is also proposed that professional services be reduced by $1,000 in an effort to perform these types of QWL services in-house rather than using outside consu ltants. An additional $1,850 would be taken from QWL, as well as $400 from trave1. Planninq It is proposed that $8,830 be reduced from this budget which involves reducing the budgeting for the vacant Principal Planner position from E to C step and a number of miscellaneous reductions from travel, overtime, photo and blueprint and other contractual services. As mentioned above, a larger cut, say $50,000 from the General Fund, would be 7 1/''''8' Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 difficult to accomplish without impacting services provided by this department. Since so much of the department's operation is supported by fees or other revenues, a $50,000 reduction would probably not have much of a bottom line impact on the General Fund. Planning is not experiencing a workload reduction, and so their main issue is the balance between the General Fund and revenue producing projects upon which the department would work. Currently, action was taken to shift projects that would produce $75,000 more in the Planning revenue in order to pay for the Youth Action Program as a backup revenue source, in case private donations for the Youth Action Program would be unavailable. In connection with that private donation, by the way, I'll be having lunch next week wi th the pr i nc i pa 1 of the firm that may be interested in th i s program, and I should have a better perspective of their willingness and ability to support this program. In any case, it is recommended at this time that the $8,830 be taken from the Planning Department's budget at this time. Pol ice Initially in order to meet the $540,000 expenditure reduction to counteract the loss of State revenue, it was expected that a little over $171,000 would be needed from the Pol ice Department. This was reduced to $132,000 and, as described below, we feel this can be accompl ished without impacting service levels. The proposed reductions in this budget include the following: Currently, a vacant Captain position is being backfilled by a Lieutenant. It is expected that the vacant Capta in's pos i t ion wi 11 be fill ed on November 1, 1993, with the result that there will be a salary savings of $33,500. It is proposed that the overtime budget be reduced by $45,000. This will leave the department with $750,000, which is $100,000 more than the department had in 1992-93. The Chief feels that this will provide a $95- $100,000 cushion in the overtime budget for contingencies. This funding level in the overtime budget is supported by the Chief. Instead of buying a new police dog, the department proposes that an existing police dog be retrained with a new handler, saving $6,000 in expenses. As part of an energy conservation program call "Turn Off aLight", the department expects to save $10,000 in its utility bill. By reducing ARJIS utilization by 12.5%, the department expects to save $12,500, which the Chief feels will have no or marginal operational impact. Based on workforce reductions at Rohr and the significant reduction in traffic, plus traffic flow improvements in the general vicinity of the Rohr facility, it is recommended that the funding for the Rohr crossing 8 JJ, ~, Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 guards be reduced by 50% ($17,500). This recommendation was offered by the Rohr crossing guards. Various miscellaneous accounts in the amount of $7,500 are recommended for reduction, with no operational impact expected from these reductions. Public Works Enqineerinq It is recommended that the General Fund portion of the Engineering Department be reduced by $59,076. Major reductions here include delaying the replacement of Engineering Aide in Traffic Engineering until April 1, 1994 at a savings of $28,593. Basically, the responsibility of this person is to set up traffic counters to gather traffic data on the City's traffic system. The City is currently caught up to date on it's traffic count work. So as a result, the vacant position in this section would be filled by April 1, 1994 in order to complete the traffic counts for the annual growth management study. It is also proposed that an Engineering Tech position be frozen for six months ($20,168). This person is in Design, but actually an aide would backfill that slot from the Permits section. It is also proposed that 510 hours of Intern hours be frozen at a savings of $3,745. There are a number of other miscellaneous accounts that would be reduced such as overtime, travel, training and other equipment. There seems to be some concern over the amount of supervlslon in Engineering. While this is certainly a valid subject to raise and is something that is being looked at, generally the supervision level is pretty consistent with the way most engineering functions are established, both public and private. Of course there can be exceptions to this, but one supervisory position, which is a Sr. Civil Engineer position, is currently vacant and will be kept that way until we have a better perspective of the needs for processing the Otay Ranch Project for which this position was created as well as the overall workload of the department. There may not be a need to actually fill this position based on workload, but as we get closer to Baldwin's next land use proposals, that can be determined at that time. In any case, this position is vacant and will be kept that way until we have a better idea of the approval process for the Otay Ranch Project and the applications that will be made by the Baldwin Company. Operations The main savings in this account results from freezing one Tree Trimmer position which has been frozen for over a year. Public Works Operations has been able to 9 I~"'JO Item Hi Meeting Date 07/13/93 perform tree trimming service satisfactorily, utilizing probation workers and others successfully over the past year. Since that process is successfu" the department plans to continue using that assistance with the result that salary savings from this frozen position can be utilized to counteract the reduct~on in revenue from the State. There is also a reduction of $20,000 in construction materials which is justified based on past expenditure history, plus some miscellaneous account cuts amounting to $3,718. Non-Departmental It is proposed that $10,100 in cuts be taken from the Non-Departmental b~dget. The City maintains a contingency account for hazardous waste studies of $19,000. It is recommended to reduce th i s cont i ngency account by 50%, to a to~a 1 of $5,000. To date, none of these funds have been used. It is also recommended to reduce the Council contingency account from $15,000 to $10,000, a cut of $r,OOO. This account also has only been used on a very limited basis over the last several years. A total of $100 in memberships is recommended to be cut,:which can be paid for by the individual out of professional enrichment funds. ' HIRING FREEZE At the June 22,1993 Council meeting, Council implemented a hiring freeze for all positions exclusive of those directly related to public safety, such as police officers and fire fighters. At that time, the State cut was not specifically known and this action was proposed as an interim measure in preparation for the final State cut information. Now that the State cut is known and we have recommended expenditure cuts and additional revenues to meet the net loss in revenue from the State of $540,000, it is recommended that the hiring freeze be el iminated. There are many vacant positions throughout the City which are critical to maintaining the current service levels being provided to our citizens. It is recommended that all vacant positions not previously identified as those to be frozen or eliminated from the budget be filled at this time. RECLASSIFICATIONS Included as part of the FY 1993-94 proposed budget presented for Council adoption on June 15, 1993 were three position reclassifications recommended for your approval. During budget deliberations, Council directed that all position reclassifications be eliminated for FY 1993-94. It is requested that Council reconsider the three reclassifications submitted. The first reclassification recommended was in the Finance Department, reclassifvina a Senior Accountina Assistant to Collection Supervisor at a net increased cost of $7,653. This position's duties were studied by the Personnel Department and recommended to be rec 1 ass if i ed to the higher 1 eve 1. The basi s for this recommendation is that the actual duties being performed by this position 10 I~.i) Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 far exceed the knowledge, skills and abilities required of a Senior Accounting Assistant. If this position continues to work at duties which are beyond its current classification, .the City will be in violation of Civil Service rules and we would be forced to change the duties of the position so that all duties fall within the lower classification realm of responsibility, thereby minimizing its effectiveness. The new duties are required to effectively implement the Revenue and Recovery Division's new comprehensive collections program and the new AB 408 (parking violation decriminalization) program. These new programs require a significantly higher level of expertise, responsibility and discretion, as well as supervision of employees, volunteers and interns. The need for a Collections Supervisor is strong and could be supported as an entirely new position. However, greater efforts at automating systems, in conjunction with the use of volunteers to do low level tasks make it reasonable to experiment with meeting new program needs by upgrading an existing position. This position, if allowed to perform at the higher level and be appropriately compensated, will create additional revenue of approximately $131,000 in FY 1993-94, which has been included in the actual revenue support for the operating budget. Should this reclass not be approved, staff would be required to relook at the revenue and likely would have to reduce the amount of revenue which could be generated by this position by up to one-half. Also, additional funds would likely need to be appropriated for the AB 408 program. It is recommended that the Counci 1 reconsider this reclassification in light of the actual duties being performed which exceed the current position classification, and the additional revenue which can be gained by this increase. The second rec 1 ass if i cat ion requested is in the Management and I nformat i on Services Department, the Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation Division, from an Administrative Analvst II to a Senior Manaqement Analvst at a total cost of $4,434. This reclass was requested to be implemented effective January I, 1994 and would therefore only be in effect for the last six months of the fiscal year. This position was studied by the Personnel Department and the resulting recommendation of an increase to Senior Management Analyst was as a result of that personnel reclassification study. In the study, it was identified that the current Administrative Analyst II is presently performing duties and skills which far exceed the position classification of Administrative Analyst II. These current duties have significant impacts on City revenue and include responsibility for (1) updating the City's full cost recovery factors (FCRs), including the Citywide factor and individual department/division factors, and developing special FCRs for specific programs such as the Federal Aid Urban; (2) analyzing the direct and indirect cost allocations for City services and preparing updates to the Master Fee Schedule; and (3) overseeing the Citywide project accounting system, including the training of departmental staff and monitoring reimbursements. In addition, the current incumbent has primary responsibility for assisting departments in assessing the costs/benefits associated with in-house versus contract decisions. The circumstances of this position also include the ability to fully access a career ladder within a series. As Council has agreed to in the past, it was recommended that the movement from Administrative Analyst I through Senior Management Analyst also be considered as a career ladder, and that individuals may move from the I level to 11 I~"'/~ Item 16 Meeting Date 07/13/93 the Senior level based on needs and performance. As such, it is recommended that Council reconsider the reclassification of Administrative Analyst II to Senior Management Analyst. As previously noted, the actual reclassification would not take effect until January, 1994. However, approval of the reclassification is needed at this time to enable the incumbent to continue work on the projects noted above during the interim period. The final reclassification requested was in the Planning Department, from Assoc i ate Planner to Sen i or Planner, wh i ch wou 1 d become the Des i gn Rev i ew Coordinator at a total cost of $4,030. It has been the department's desire to implement an official Design Review Coordinator with the requirement of an architect's license, and which would clearly be able to oversee the design review process, among other duties. The benefit of this would allow for improved streamlining and increasing the quality of staff support that can be provided to the Design Review Committee. Currently the department has been fi 11 ing this need by using a consultant, who is a licensed architect, to coordinate all design review. As you may remember, there was concern expressed by many outside architects that the planners providing support to the Design Review Committee had very limited, or no, architectural background. The implementation of this reclass was meant to meet that concern, and those expressed by the Council, in order to expedite the processing of projects before the City, as well as providing a better interface with the public. From the FY 1992-93 to the FY 1993-94 budget, staff was able to eliminate $5,000 from Planning and Community Development for architectural consultant services since we had planned to have an in-house architect. In addition, this temporary architect has saved the City consulting costs by providing Community Development advice on dealing with the parking structure defects at Park Plaza at the Village. Should the Council not approve reconsideration of this reclassification to Senior Planner, the department will not be able to provide the architectural support to the Design Review Committee which was previously requested. Also anticipated with this reclass was a reduction in overtime costs to attend evening meetings, such as DRC. The Senior Planner does not receive overtime, while an Assistant Planner must be compensated for attendance at meetings. It is therefore recommended that the Council reconsider this reclass from Associate Planner to Senior Planner. FISCAL IMPACT: The approval of the recommended budget reductions will adopt a revised budget for 1993-94 of $54,418,775. JDG:mab cuts 12 I~ -13 "U .1l m \~-l '+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffi ~ a ~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ :D"< Ciilllm-<rii ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ m Z '-I m Ct.l m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ mm c:n~=B :0 ~ [!1 z 0 o Iii -l C ~ m ~ :D ~ m ~ () " m !:( ~ 3 3" en c r:r ~ ~ '" ~ '" '" '" ~~~iii~;1 Z l? go [!] ~ ~~!"~:~ ~~g>i~ ; c5~' ::l _<cc3"" a II) (f.I (;;. ::l 3~Q'[g El - :':i ~ ..\1 >~o3 C" ~ 3 " c '< ~~a8~ "," E: => flf 0 3 5' 3 e; 0 (Q ;; S- ~ ~ lll? ..\1 - '" o = ; .{ Co =r :~ I ~ "" ':' l? o [ ~ [ ~ m 3 => 5 :; l& [ < ll. => ~ fii' l: 0 C :\'& -6 ~ So ct a ;::1. m ~ ;:t! s. !S" !!. ~ l? il ~ S' !i !l' !l ~ ~ ~.g:a-'< g.s-Z ~ g f I ::l ... 5' ~ -~(O~ i ~ ~ ~ 3 3 [ ~ t .c if -< 9. => l& " 3 i C m " -l en Ul C m )> s: o c: Z -l o o s: s: m z -l '{> ~ ~ "' '" )> ~ (') :J: ;;: m z -i )> 9 9 9 9 999 3333333 li' li' li' li' li' li' li' < < < < < < < c m "'ll -l 'l c <b "' Ol~-i;:-o-o~ VI 8_~~@;g VI ^()-oOli!~ c: Jbrn::cmG)z- ~(:!!~iJlmG)~ m OJ "0 m *' RO t:: ""0 "'tI tc 5;? C .. Z g :; fJl g ~ o fJl Gl 3 iii 3 ~ (/) c C" i; ![ ~ :s: 8: 4l't $ -EI't $ 0 ~~~~~~i c: !l z -l -0 . co . w \ ~ - \~ Cll Cll Cll Cll l>' l>' l>' l>' ::I: :r::r: :r. C m "tJ .... ~ 0> L S <b '" ~~ ~ ~ Ul I Ul m ~ JJ C 0 0 8 !i: m m m m ~ ~ ;: '" ;: E. 0 c: 0 S' =< '" rn l>' if c a> g> ~ [ )> 3: z: 1Il1ll 0 '" ~~~~ c: ~ z .... 0> 0> (") ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 3: s- s- a> a> 3: c. c. m m m 55 z ~ sa. So .... '" :T :T m ~ ~ '" S' 5" '" '" l!' "1l 8: ~ _. a> ~~ iil 3 ." S' m !ll ~ \\0-1 ~ ;;I' '" ~ .. \ lo- \1 ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ II II II II II II II II :II ~ ~ ~ II g> C" it [ ::iO"'-i-i-iIg o:i!8~~~grn m"l.ijZm:c::t :D en :r: Z r ~ ~ 8 ~ Ci) ~ m ~ m Ci) o ill o =l fJi jg 1B ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~g~~8 ~ 5' '" '" il' 3 ::i o ~ $1' ~ ~ li g; ~ .., o ~ ~ !!. i Ii l!l =r o ~ i;! c m "0 -I Cii CI> C m )> 3: o c Z -I (") o 3: 3: m z -I ~ OJ <- S <b '" :!I :!I :!I :!I ~ :!I :!I :!I :!I 0 '" Cii Cii Cii Cii " Cii Cii Cii Cii m '- c "tI "' -i w :!I Cii If' 0- il !!!. o CD ~ 0 .... 0 .... :I: 0 :I: m:ll: m :0((.)-:0 g ifig ;: l1; ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ () =l r.... - c: rn ~ <n m :1i! -i -I ""C ""C 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ zrz<n~ G.l (j) m s::: ~ m () m rn ;Ii '" " '" ~ t! t!t! l\l ll'l~ ~ ~~~~g~i~~ ~ 5" CO o a- 3 ~ c8 o "" !!t 0" ~ So ~ m 8 ~ :; a lb-t~ en en c m :to s:: o c Z -I (") o s:: s:: m z -I ~ co ~ 0> '6 - Ie; c c c c c c c c c c c c c cr cr cr cr cr ~ cr u cr cr u cr cr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c C" ~ '" c ~ !!!. ;:: Sl i!: :ll 0 Iii J: 0 III =11 om-m5 m :ll 0 :ll m E: 8 ~ ~ (J) Z 3: c ~ ~ ~ ;::0 i!'~ ;:: ~ c 0 ~ m cn_~m(J) ~ ffi i ~ -I ;:: m ~ ~ ~ ~ J: c 0 m '6 .... :ll ;:: 0 C1 ~ .. o ~ '" ~ m E ~ ~ ~ c' 0 ~ j!:: m z '" Gl m ~ C1 ffi "'tJ~3:ICJ :ll os m 0 8 ~ ." 8 i @ Z 0 S5 ~ Ci) :0 m ~ s;!o en ." ..- ~ Pi 0 Ci) z-<:orn o '" Z ~ Gl -< ~ ~ '" '" 11: - iii~~~i~~~~ ~!! ~~ if ~ ~ o c: [ ~ "!< 5' !l' ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ 0 ~ l& l& 0 5' ~ 15: ~ m [ !T c m fe a ~. ~ - " ~' ~ !l' ~ ~ o ~ ~ '" " g, a. f ~ f C" c. 2' g ~ is ~ "0 if [ II a Ii' Q ~ l& 5' -I ~ f ~' ~ ~ '" So ~ ~ c c II go ~ " ~ 5' .. Q. ~ g 0; E ~. 5' 8' i!S: 0 3 ~ 5' c m 'tI -t 'l' L C "' '" Cii en c: m )> 3: o c: Z -t (') o 3: 3: m Z -t ~ <C ~ " ,~- U> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en en en us CiS en en en Ci5 en CiS en en (j5 CiS ~ a ll" :;- 0' en 'li g> C" i ;;: ~ Z <:l ;;: OJ 0 /iio!!l:r:!<S<=H o :Dmr=~o F ~Jl-lCJlm ~ z8~ ~ m c:3:~ "'tI ~ ~~~ ~ en elOl!: m E :c ~ ~ c :orno en ~ ~ -l , ." ;;: ;;: m m ~ :<:i ~ :1 - '" tltl;i"~ J>o. 0...... ..... ~j~ g) ~ o C" '< .g> ~. !!!. a' I ~ " <C ~ :oo-t-i"'O"'tIJ:O ~ ~ ~ ~ lil ill 8 r1i ~."."m>;RJl:!1 I:nC:I:r-Ci)cn~- ;ri 0 m 21 "'" iii Ro:tl~ o~ ~~ ~rn m -I m m ~ ~ C'l C'l m m '" ..jl:_;;;..~..tl~tl m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii' ~ ... Gl r- !Z ... 8 " 9' ~ C m 'tl -t ~ 0> L So ~ (ij CIl c: m )> s: o c: Z -t C') o s: s: m z -t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l? l? l? "0 "0 "0 ~ ~ ~ C m "tl -t 'I' <- So <b '" (') ;:: -0 VI o m i3 c ;:: VI z OJ "T1 (') m rn c: F ill '" m ~ (') J: 5 o - ~ ~ :"l CJl l? z '" "0 Gl m " m ~ g z S1 (') ~ m ~ '" [ rn 0 I' 6 [ )> s: !! ~"'~ 0 0 c: 8 @ 8 @ Z -t !! !\' ~ (') 0 0 ~ & 0 il ~ s: a ~ s: ~. if ~ 9' [ m -0 S' Z " S' a' 0 -t '" '" ~ 0 ~ m 0 '" o' ~ ~ '" e.. $' ~ ~ ~ c. g: -. 3 l! a ~ 2' 5" ~ '" c. ~ o ~ .l! 11...2..1 ~ (Q m (Q II.c - 2.2.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ $I o (J) c t:r it !!t ~~~~~ r' r' 8 -< ~ -< -< 0 0 - oo~:oz ~~m~~ z ~ ~ c S6 :-i. "'O::g ~ 8CJ~Cm Ihmmcn gj ~ (J) (J) m o c '6 C -< f5 I ::! ~ < 8 ~ z m :0 ffi Z ~ ~ en G> ~ ~ z '" Gl Gl fJl !i ~ )(l~~<,..,,;:~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ $ $ ~ ~ g.-g. ~ 0' ~ ~ -< ~ 2 1i ~ :;l i!' c a a o i!' ~ Q. o o m 'tl -l 0> L c <h '" en en c: m > s: o c: Z -l (') o s: s: m z -l ""ll ;!' if ""ll ;!' C ~ f 0> m m L ~ ~ 1l ~ ~ m 0 " " " " " " ~ b " " " " " " -l '" !!. !!. !!. !!. !!. !!. .... .... Ei ~ ~ Tii z,:!l Ci) !: ~ m Z ~ Gl Z Gl (f) l " " !!!. (f) o i ~ "tI I ffi ~ ~ :c rn ~ (f) ~ ril 0 ~ o ~ Gl ~ ~ rn o ~ (f) 0 m m ~ (f) o ill .. <5 ~~1(!!1!1~ ~ ~i!l~~~!ll ~ o g ~ ~ (5" " ~ ! ;;? lC m <5 It" - 2. ~ f/) f/) c: m )> s:: o c: Z -l o o s:: s:: m Z -l i m ::: 1\o.2..l./ "'0 :!l :!1 ;\l Jl Jl "'0 :!l ~ !!l !!l ~ !!l g ~ !!l :3 :3 :3 :3 :3 :J ::l :J S' S" S' S" S" 5" :i" :5" CO CO (0 (0 co (0 CO co :!l !!l ~ S. '" rn o C" it ![ Sl:il~O;:l:l J:m:::grii!!Jz m ~ :!l 0 III :CrO-:!:=l 8 !lO iii ~ rn ~ E ~ qJ .... ;!l '" ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;: !lO ~ ~ Gl rn ~ ~ ~1~i~~I~ ~~~~~~~~ II II II II 0 0 0 0 = - = = II II II II !!l~g!!l4'4'4'4' gggg-.-.-.-. mlj~~~.a.~.a. Dl fl) I>> I>> i i i i @@@@--i- oooc~~!!li\l 3. a a 3. :J ::l ::l 5 ... ... ... ... 5Il <<> CD Sll ~~~hl~~~ g.g.g.g.~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. .. (I) (I'l (I) (I) cs 0 cs 0 3 3 3 3 m m m m a a a a 0000 Ii Ii Ii Ii '0 '0 "0 "0 c m "'ll -t ~ m L c (l) '" UI <n c m )> s: o c Z -t o o s: s: m z -t ~ ;U: ~ ~ ii' ii' ii's' ii' C m "0 -I 'I' '- " d; '" o c: '"C I C/) UI -; -; '" ~ ~ IFGl UI m - ~ 8ffi~ c: ~ ~ m ~ 0 " ~ ~ Gl '" o m m o C/) en z =< m Il1 ill ~ =< ~ () C/) Ul g' g> ~ ![ )> 3: ~ '" "'~ 0 l\lo8t~ c: ~ ~~~~~ Z -I ~~~~~ 0 ~g.~C8 0 ll. 9 ~ ~ !!l 3: " r; ~ 3: g'I'1";;S, m :s CD ct :::) Z ~ ~o.a-~<fA -I <0 o 5 g 0 ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ;;; ~.~ma.~ ~ it .~ '" it f!-3~5' ~ ~ or ~ ;; ... g. -. ~ ;; Q => 3 ~ 3 m ~ ~ ~ ~ CD ca ; ~ r; o => '< - ~ 0. 8 ; ll) a ;jl ll. a. .g ~ ll. ~ !O .., ::! _ if o - ~ => \S ~ "0 Il' a ~ - <0 9. iil => 3 ~ ~ =. ;; I <'.2,.S ;l' ee m '" -< ~ i ~ Gl Gl ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p ;p C 'l' m ~ ~ 0" C" tT tT 0" tT 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" 0" m '- m m ~~~~~~ c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "tl b CP (/l CIl cp en (j) -l '" ("')("') 066066 ~~ m m m m m m m m m m ell ell ell ell ell ell z z z z z z z z z z GlGlGlGlGlGlGlGlGlGl Ii' ~ ~ !!. ~ i en m 1; z Gl en ~ en c C" [ i~~ ~.>:! ~ '" 1:S '" If ! ~ g s- o; q So lB c 0 " m m i3' 9. 3 ::i ~ o I'T "0 g, if .l! IF W c. '< ;p !2: 0' ~ i:f If' ~ [ '" E " fll ~ m a 0' ~ " If' C" [ ~~~~~~ ~ ~ :ti (') ~ ~ ~ ." 5 ~ jlO ::; L:D-IZr> ~m5GlI!'Gl J:!1zcntnrn in ;;: C m :>>"1l '" -< "1l me ;IJ rn ~ i ~ ~i~~~~ ~~~~~i ~ @' ~ . fS I: ?- ~ g. ~. ~,g ~ ~ ~ -0 ::;l a> m 3' " 3 3 ~ g ~ CD m a 3. e: a a '- ". !l ~' ~ S i1l .t ". o !; '" \ \.- 2k -1-1~ ~ ~ ~ Z r " Gl m ~ ~ S' m ~ S' ee If' ~ [ Sl en ::i en ~ ~ 0 ~ e ~ 'ii ~ ;;: m '!i ~ ~ ~~1(:~~~ ~ii~~~~ Ii' Ii' ::i Ii' ~ Sir 0 fir ;j<ey'< c~=;p a eg, .l! i2. ". ~ ~ lJl g ~ l'll~. 3 9.c5 ~ ~ -< - ~ g. ~ ~ "8 ~. o ~ ~ ((J c5' S' ~ ee i ~ :7 ~ @' ~ ~ i i ;;:::c 9 [!J e "' ~ fl ~ ;IJ '< i: m ::; m ~ rn '" tlt;: ~~~8 @' m N m ". ~ t. 3 m 5' 0; 3 'lil o ". e Cii en c m )> s: o c Z -l o o s: s: m z -l RESOLUTION NO. J 7/1,3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE 1993-94 BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR REVENUE REDUCTIONS FROM THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA WHEREAS, on June 15, 1993, the city Council adopted the 1993-94 operating budget with the understanding that the budget would be revisited after the State adopted its budget and the impact of the State revenue cuts on the city were known; and WHEREAS, at the same time, a hiring freeze was imposed, except for certain public safety positions; and WHEREAS, based on the final adopted version of the State Budget, the City's net loss of revenue is $540,000; and WHEREAS, the personnel changes reflected in these cuts include freezing a Plan Checker and Building Inspector position in Building and Housing for six months, and deleting a .25 clerical position in the Library; and WHEREAS, it is proposed that the .7 FTE Environmental Program Manager in community Development be made a full-time position, which position was at a .7 FTE to accommodate the incumbent in this job, who is now moving out of the area, and it is felt that'to obtain someone of a comparable quality to fill this position, it will need to be a full-time position; and WHEREAS, during budget deliberations, Council directed that all position reclassifications be eliminated for FY 1993-94 and it is requested that Council reconsider the following three reclassifications: o Reclassifying a Senior Accounting Assistant to Collection Supervisor in the Finance Department at a net increase cost of $7,653. o Reclassifying an Administrative Analyst II in the Policy Analysis and Program Evaluation Division of Management and Information Services to a Senior Management Analyst at a total cost of $4,434 to be implemented January 1, 1994. o Reclassifying an Associate Planner Planner in the Planning Department at a of $4,030. to Senior total cost 1 It. ':1.7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the 1993-94 Budget to account for revenue reductions in the net amount of $540,000 from the State of California as set forth in Attachment "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the hiring freeze is hereby eliminated effective immediately. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Environmental Program Manager position in Community Development be made a full-time position. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reclassifications listed hereinabove are approved. John Goss, city Manager od a~ 'ty Attorney Presented by F:\homc\attomey\budget.cut 2 I" ''< Y COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ItemiL Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing on consideration of an increase in sewer service charges Resolution /? J" '1APproving an amendment to the Master Fee Schedule on sewer service charges and transfer of $1,856,000 from Fund 222 to Fund 225 SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~ REVIEWED BY: City Manager -.j'=t bvQ~Y\ (4/5ths Vote: YesXNo_) As a Participating Agency of the Metro Sewer System, the City of Chula Vista is required to pay for our share of its operation, maintenance and upgrade costs. Due to the increased cost of upgrading regional wastewater transportation, treatment and disposal, it is necessary to raise the sewer service charges for Fiscal Year 1993-94. As discussed in the report, the exact amount of sewer rate increases over the next few years will depend on decisions made by Chula Vista and the Regional sewering agencies, the court, and possibly changes in the Federal Clean Water Act. Under any scenario, rates will increase for Chula Vista residents over the next 10 years, and staff is recommending a modest rate increase for next fiscal year. Chula Vista has retained a team of Sewer Consultants to help us in reaching the best decision for the future of Chula Vista. RECOMMENDATION: That Council hold the public hearing and approve the resolution increasing the monthly sewer rate by 6 1/4% to $17.00 per month per EDU. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable DISCUSSION: The City of San Diego has been considering the upgrade of the Metropolitan Sewer System since it decided in 1987 to drop its request for a waiver from the requirement to convert Pt. Lorna Wastewater Treatment Plant from Advanced Primary to Secondary Treatment. In FY 1991 Chula Vista began raising its sewer service fees in anticipation of a huge Sewage Construction project of $2.5 Billion which was to be constructed over the next 13 years. At that time, and based upon cost estimates provided by San Diego City staff, Chula Vista staff estimated that the fees would have to be raised an initial amount of 20 % followed by annual 11 % increases. The Council had expressed a desire at an earlier rate increase hearing to not wait and hit the public with a hugh increase, but instead, levy a series of smaller increases which would allow the public to better absorb the cost within their budgets. 17-- / Page 2, Item /1 Meeting Date 7/13/93 Since that time, several changes have occurred to the program: . San Diego has yet to issue any debt to finance the capital improvements. This has delayed the bonded indebtedness program for at least two years, but also it has required San Diego to break out the Pt. Loma Outfall extension and Fiesta Island Sludge removal project and begin work on it sooner. It has also required San Diego to pay cash rather than finance the work, leaving us with higher earlier costs. . In the summer of 1991 the City and the EPA, because of a lawsuit from the EPA, agreed upon a course of action called Alternative IV which was part of a Consent Decree. The Judge ordered the Consent Degree, (Agreeing to the A1t. IV $2.5 Billion program) to be delayed until a testing program for chemical secondary treatment could be completed at Pt. Loma which would allow that plant to remain at Advanced Primary. This could have the effect of lowering overall costs, but would have little effect on earlier cost increases. The tests should be completed this summer. . The City Council of San Diego adopted the "Consumers Alternative" which greatly reduced the scope of Alternative IV from $2.5 Billion to $1.2 Billion. This had the impact of reducing later year increases in the sewer rates, but did not reduce the earlier years costs as earlier infrastructure requirements did not change with either Alternative. . The National Science Foundation completed a study for the EPA, (partly funded by San Diego) that indicated that full Secondary Sewage treatment at Pt. Lorna was not necessary and a waste of money. As is shown by the above history, the ultimate program and its cost to the rate payers of Chula Vista is yet to be defined. However, although the actual cost increase is not known, costs will be incurred for upgraded sewer service. Therefore, Chula Vista, along with other Metro Agencies, have raised sewer rates. Chula Vista's annual costs to Metro and Spring Valley could increase from around $7 million to an amount, depending on different outcomes of the CWP Capital program, between $11 million and $17 million for implementation of the "Consumers Alternative". On the other hand we have built up significant reserves in the Sewer Funds, that would help us ride over any huge single year increase. Revised Ten-Year Cost Proiections Table 1 and Table 2 In June 1993, the Clean Water Program staff prepared new cost projections for two options: (1) the Consumers' Alternative Excluding Water Reclamation and Oversizing and (2) the Consumers' Alternative Including Water Reclamation and Oversizing. Both these options are based on the "Consumers Alternative", which is the low cost option adopted by the San Diego / 7-.2.. Page 3, Item~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 City Council. Although based on our original "1960 Sewage Agreement," San Diego can't charge us for expansion and Water Reclamation, we should consider those higher costs, because, subject to Chula Vista's final actions regarding participation in the SDA WMD, costs for Water Reclamation and Expansion may be included in some fashion. City staff used this information in order to prepare the enclosed ten-year rate projection tables (Tables 1 & 2). . Payments to the Spring Valley Sanitation District for flow discharged to the Spring Valley Outfall Sewer (Columns 5 & 12), operation and maintenance for the Chula Vista collection system (Column 16), revenue from interest and other sources, and capacity fee contributions (Column 19) have also been included. Adjustments were also made to Fiscal Year 1993-94 estimates to include back billing for previous years' undercharging and other items discussed in the next section. . The sewer service charges have been calculated under two scenarios. Column 17 (Tables 1 & 2) shows what the sewer service charge would need to be without revenue assistance from other sources. Column 20 presents the sewer service charge after deductions for miscellaneous income (interest, industrial waste fees, some pump station fees) and transfers from sewer capacity fees. Both calculations include $0.70 per EDU for the sewer rehabilitation fee. . Chula Vista has been collecting a connection charge or "join the club fee" from developers for each new connection to the sewer system. It is appropriate that monies from this Fund (Fund 222) be used to offset some of the cost of the CWP upgrade program since existing CV ratepayers have been paying for excess capacity for 30 years, and a portion of the upgrade program is for expansion of the system. . The contributions from the sewer capacity fees in Table 1 (Column 18), which would be transferred from Fund 222, were justified based on information provided by the Clean Water Program. The total 1993 replacement value of the Metropolitan Sewerage System was estimated at $764,495,000. Since the current plant capacity is 218 mgd, the value per gallon of capacity is $3.50. At an estimated 1,000 EDUs connected per year, the total "buy in" to the existing system would be approximately $928,000 per year. This "buyin" is discussed below as a transfer from Fund 222 (Sewer Connection Charges) and is used in the Excluding Reclamation table (Table 1). . The capacity fee contributions in Table 2 (the Including Reclamation table) (Column 18) were obtained from the System Buy-In Charge Calculation tables prepared by the Clean Water Program on June 24, 1993. The Sewer Facilities Charge includes a "buy in" payment for capacity in the existing system, as well as payment for a portion of the water reclamation and expansion costs. 17-J Page 4, Item-d- Meeting Date 7/13/93 Attachment 1 shows the same information in a graph format comparing the Column 20 cost per EDU from Fiscal Year 1994 to 2003 for Tables 1 and 2, (the Excluding Water Reclamation and Including Water Reclamation tables). Under the scenario excluding water reclamation, the maximum rate of $23.73 per month would occur in the year 2001. Under the scenario including water reclamation, the maximum rate of $31.79 would occur earlier, in the year 1997. As mentioned earlier, Chula Vista has not agreed to any option at this point, and is using the lower cost option to base this cost increase. We are using a consultant team to help us decide on the best option for Chula Vista. That decision will be partially based on the final terms and conditions in the Special Act District and/or agreement between us and the City of San Diego. Determination of Fiscal Year 1993-94 Rates The following table itemizes the main budget items for Fiscal Year 1993-94 under the Consumers' Alternative Excluding Water Reclamation and Oversizing. If water reclamation and oversizing are included, there would be approximately $3,888,000 in additional expenditures. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Catel!ory 1993-94 Estimated Expenditures Metro/CWP Expenses Metro flow rate adjustment FY 1992-93 Spring Valley Sanitation District Payment Spring Valley back bill Tijuana sewage M & 0 SDA WMD Operations Transfers to General Fund Miscellaneous Chula Vista Operating Expenses $ 6,046,000 $ 587,000 $ 1,566,000 $ 307,400 $ 236,200 $ 52,200 $ 2,426,100 $ 508.900 $ 11,729,800 The Federal Government may not reimburse the Metro system for the entire cost of treating Tijuana sewage. Clean Water Program staff have therefore estimated the cost to be allocated to each agency for Fiscal Years 1992-93 and 1993-94 (Category 5). This item will need to be approved by the SDA WMD Board before it is billed to the agencies. (Recent news articles have indicated that the Federal Government will pay most of the costs.) Our average wastewater flow over the past year has been 11.599 million gallons per day. Based on our flow rate, the number of sewer connections, and customer account information, we estimate that the City currently has approximately 49,360 EDUs of flow, one EDU being equivalent to the flow from a single family house. The single family residential rate was therefore calculated as follows: 17"''1 Page 5, HemE Meeting Date 7/13/93 Factor Cost Expenses Interest and Miscellaneous Revenues Capacity Fee Transfer (from Fund 222) Revenue Required from Sewer Service Charges Service Charge/ EDD per month Including $.70/month Sewer Replacement Fee $11,729,800 - $418,000 - $928,000 $10,383,800 $ 17.53 $ 18.23 Several factors must be considered in deciding whether the sewer service rates should be increased: . The first factor is the size of the reserves. The 1992-93 budget projected a reserve balance of $8,463,363 in Fund 225 (Sewer Service Revenues collected monthly per existing customers) as of July 1993. If approximately $1,321,000 of the reserve in Fund 225 was used, the current sewer service charge would remain unchanged. A rate increase would not be needed until Fiscal Year 1995-96, provided that the Excluding Water Reclamation table is valid. However, under any scenario that Chula Vista is considering, sewer rates will go up significantly over the next several years, and ifrates aren't increased this year, future year increases will have to be raised that much more. . The second factor is the viability of the Excluding Water Reclamation scenario. It is highly unlikely that the City of San Diego will agree to pay the entire cost of water reclamation for the Metro system. However, those costs can't be charged to Chula Vista unless we agree. That decision won't be made until later. Moreover, it is not certain if the Consumers' Alternative will be acceptable to the EPA. The EPA may not accept continuation of advanced primary treatment at Point Lorna, since secondary treatment standards cannot be achieved. A more costly treatment alternative would then need to be devised, and Fund 225 would need to be maintained at a higher level to allow payment of these higher costs . The third factor is that if Chula Vista is required to share in the cost of water reclamation and expansion of system capacity justification will exist for the use of larger amounts of Fund 222 money. Inasmuch as this fund is anticipated to have a balance of $5,659,550 after the transfers proposed in this report are made we believe that an adequate safety factor will be maintained. We believe that it would be imprudent to use Fund 225 reserves at this time because of the likelihood of the more expensive treatment alternatives becoming necessary. However, we also believe that a rate increase to $18.23 (13.9 percent) is undesirable at this time, given the current economic conditions. This rate considers a transfer of $928,000 from Fund 222 for Fiscal Year 1993-94 based on an average of 1,000 connections per year and a capacity charge of $928 per )7,,5 Page 6, Item4 Meeting Date 7/13/93 connection ($3.50 per gallon and 265 gallons per day per EDU). A total of $928,000 could have been transferred from Fund 222 last year on the same basis and we are proposing that such transfer be made now. In summary, we are recommending that (1) A transfer from Fund 222 in the amount of $729,000 be authorized for 1992-93 in addition to the transfer of $199,000 approved last year. That earlier approved transfer has not yet been accomplished, since it has not been needed for payment to other agencies until now and (2) That a transfer from Fund 222 in the amount of $928,000 be made for 1993-94. With this proposed transfer from Fund 222 the Sewer Service Charge can be held to $17.00 per month per EDU. This represents an increase of 6.25 percent; less than the 11 % per year projected in 1990, but still adequate to continue toward the Council's expressed goal of meeting the ultimate costs associated with the sewer system by implementing a series of smaller annual increases as opposed to raising rates less frequently but in greater increments. These rates are reasonable in comparison to those charged by other agencies in San Diego County. As shown on Table 3 (attached), "Sewer Service Rate for Single Family Dwellings", the Fiscal Year 1992-93 charges range from $14.08 to $33.72 per month. Rates for all categories will be increased by 6.25 %. The rates will be as follows: Single family Multiple family Low Income Commercial/lndustrial Low Medium High $ 17.00/month $1.71/100 cubic feet (HCF) water used $11.90/month $1.56/HCF water used $1.92/HCF water used $2.59/HCF water used FISCAL IMPACT: Adoption of this rate structure will allow the City to cover the anticipated sewer-related expenses in FY 1993-94. It will also incorporate a transfer of $1,856,000 from Fund 222 to Fund 225. This amount represents $199,000 approved for Fiscal Year 1992-93 plus an additional $1,657,000 ($729,000 more for 1992-93 and $928,000 for 1993-94). The City has sufficient funds in Fund 222 to cover this transfer. JPL:KY-081 F:ENGlNEERlAGENDA \SEWlNC4 070993 )7~/' W"o ~~~5q:l!;;!::2~~ ccilrir-:.-.iONNM"":"": ~fil::i 0 ;;;;;;;;~~~~~~~ <",'" ~ IWW u~~ W ",,, wZ ~ ~8888~g88g "'~ V 'I/" V '<tv "'...."''''" OW '" " z uw- ~ OOQ)..,COa)a)!I;l""""'" <w>- ~@l@l@l@l@l@l@lSlSl ~~" < 0 U ". IOtn~;:!::8re~S;~j:2 :ci!l-OO O"":cri..;t'>i..;..;ltiMM "'W" ~ N..........NNNNNNN t;O 0::: 0:: ~~*"'Io9......vt.... .....UU,lW ~~ .l-5~ >"'W '!'- (j00:::0:: Uww ~O- ". :g~:!~8:?n~~:S:8 01-00 :!::~~~~~~~~ O:::tr.lW~ :0 ___....vt........... tijoa:;cr: ;:EUwW O-~ .....1000.....,....MO.....OlM ~ " .....MM.....vM....OllClOl O<DOOION........IO........ ~~:i: :t N~;~~~l)i~~~ ZO", '" ~U~ ZO Q~ ~::;:~~:q;o~~:g l1!l ~l-...l ~ .....m.....<CIIllMNOlNN <~ NM :gg~~~~~~eiei 0- c "",< ~~~ ZOO -~ "'" ........ ~Ul- " "'0" " OZ" '" U< !l :>Z. ~ R~~:g8~C!m:g~ ~Ou; Z lO"IO~""'<<l<OCCIO'I/" CJi=8 g?;~ 0<" " o:::::i':..!2 ~u~ a.:5o. ~ ~crl ~ ~"'o 1-05 "''''. W ~w~ ~z~<( :: :::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~ . 000 .. n::~~ "'z>- '" ~,,< I- ~,,~ "-~ Z~ "'_c W 0- ~2:~~ 0,," ~ <D;;~~~~~~~~ "'~. I-U= UUWO::: ~tlS~ ow '" aeCL.l-~ ~ gJ :: g: :g ~:.n~ ~:n:.n:3 ll.o:::C05 0 @Ci:~ffi ....N<D~~~~~~~ '" ~Ol- ",WO CDCCl5l....:s: oUW ~ ~~,....~<Oooooo U"O 2:filiIi ":IC')lt';-, ' u'" '" ~O-~ ~ 8fil~~",,"''''Il)'''''''' -'" uUO r-WMO>NNNN.... U 0- ~ N 1010 M.....m 0"'" ~ re~~~!f!~oooo '" u: 0 " " ~ O:EG] fl1OlM~8~~~~r:: g: gzoll::E ~ ~~~::~~~~~:! ~ "'O~ :: ~ W ~~ ~ ~o~~iiig~~ o~ ""~M'" "'10 i:i >- ~~"" ~ o:::ll-ns In _~ o>oaolt)~~$~r-- <Olfl"': ~ :r~:::!~ M M~ W r--:€;:!;iO~ '" "l'" ~.M ;!; ~~ffi1n MO M~ ~ ~ 0 .. c~ID . ~ 0" ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~. ~ NNN"lNNNNNN &~ '" ~!1c~ ~ uu :~ W 5<5 ~ J 7~ 7 '" ;!;~~~~~~_~M &~~ ~ 0.* S:S: 8g8 9 ................"1"1"1"1 Cii~~ >- ,,~~ u w . 0 Ol....lI')O>a)O>N_O>... "DO N "'W~ t-:<t!t':!I";Il:!~t\!"':ec,,! "''''''' N...........OOa:lOlfD.... IwW ~~~~~~~~f:tU u"-"- w ~ ~gg888888g "''' wz "''''''''''''''''''''''''' "'~ Ow '" Z ~ 0 ~ ~N~~q:~8~~re~ <0; _N"'..,."'....COCl...N ~ ~~ zilit~&i~~:;;t::igg ~W>-o.. <.)~anj) " . ~8S;l5g~l.8;:~~ ...ll-OO ~~~~~~~~~~ <COOW:::!: ~ 000::0: '" lit..."'........,.... I-UwW ,,-,,- 1-50 l8g~~~~~~~8 :>rt>w::!: ~ l'lg:i:i:i~~ti:;;~ 000::0:: UwW ,,-,,- ". :;:~~~~~~~~~ 01-00 ....~~?J~re~~~~ Q:CI')W:::!: ~ ........"""......""....... tii8ffiffi ~ ,,-,,- >-0 ~_~_ ~_ ~_:g_8.~_ &_~_~_ 00" :< ~1:t~~llZl.~~~ 8.. :;- z@ :a!l-o;! ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ 0" N o;ll "00>- _M t>i...:....:r-:....-,..:..;,o.,j..; :::;" zoo !i- ...~0c;;..;w;;; ~~Z; ~Ul- 00 2~~ ~..,g:?lre$~~....: >- 1O~ll>~r-. COOlg U", II Z ~zs g~~ ~ 0" ;;;u~ 8,,8 "'" "- "'~" "- a a)a)CQOQecoooo<ocooo ~u~ I-~Q <<;iDiDiO;Ow;Owi01D WW" >-",. ~z_<( N 00"," 000 ;: ~~~ "'z~ w ~"'" ... ",,,," ~"- m ~"g ;:! ,,!, w ~....~~~~~~~~ ooZo I'-~~~~~~:sl~~ o 1S'e a!la..I-!:2 o..e::m> " ~3!ll o-we:: wUO ooL1.0W :::!:;g:B 00 w ~@l::~:g~~~f;l~ co!lo..l-U ....('HO....~~~~~~ o..n::m5 ~ O-Wa:: ooLl..Ow 00 :8Si:8.....s;:OOOOO ~fa~ CI;~:8~~ oUw ',,;,'7' , u::>o ~ 9,lIJfij u'" 00 ~~~~~~p2~n~~ ~"->- ~~~cn...... _00 ~ uo U l;;l~lI')~l:;~OOOO ~.,,~ ~ gg::~;1;~" 0 00 ~ " ~ >- MNtn~~:!(!l:s:rore o:::!:ffi !~::~:!~~~~~ ill gz-cl:::!i: ~ ~ (l)O~ ;: "- 00 ;:I;CO....Olt"llO........I'-Ol w ~~~~~!8~~~~ ~oo .,z v oll' i:i I'-ClO<oon~O<OlDl'- ~ ~- '" ~:8ctlD~....~~~... ~~~ o~!-::E !- :::!~ M ~13ffi~ ,~ "Ii "'''' 00 ~ ~ 0 oi=fZ ~~~~~~~~~~ . I NNNNNNNNNN wuCl N ~l ~~~ ~",I .';::l ~ f" uu ~ ~ ~ ~ J 7.- '" CJ;on~l'-lOOl~""Nt"l ~ow l ~ Olm $$8: 888 ~~~ ~ .......................NNNN 0 TABLE 3 SEWER SERVICE RATE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS CITY FY 1992-93 RATES FY 1993-94 RATES Lemon Grove $169.00 per year No Change County of San Diego: Spring Valley $243.00 per year No Change Lakeside-Alpine $255.00 per year No Change National City $14.58 per month Fall Review Del Mar $33.72 per month $35.41 per month La Mesa $31.50 bi-monthly Fall Review Poway $36.42 bi-monthly Fall Review Padre Dam Municipal $29.00 bi-monthly $33.00 proposed San Diego $20.39 per month 6 % average increase Imperial Beach $2.30 per 100 CF proposed $231.00 $187.00 per year (average) average per year EI Cajon $1.03 per 100 CF + proposed 7.5% $1. 00 collection fee per month increase EMC:KY~081 F:ENGlNEER\AGENDAlSEWlNC2 060893 17,1 L__. J?-/~ RESOLUTION NO. 17/ /, '-I RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE ON SEWER SERVICE CHARGES AND TRANSFER OF $1,856,000 FROM FUND 222 TO FUND 225 WHEREAS, as a participating agency of the Metro Sewer System, the city of Chula vista is required to participate in its operation, maintenance and upgrade program; and WHEREAS, due to the increased cost of upgrading regional wastewater transportation, treatment and disposal, it is necessary to raise the sewer service charges for Fiscal Year 1993-94. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve an amendment to Chapter XII (Engineering - Sewer), section B Service Charges, as follows: B. SERVICE CHARGES 1. Sewer Service Charges In addition to other fees, assessments or charges provided by the city code or otherwise, the owner or occupant of any parcel of real property which said parcel is connected to the sewer system of the city and to a water system maintained by the Sweetwater Authority or the Otay Municipal Water District shall pay a sewer service charge as follows, applicable to the first whole billing period subsequent to July 1, ~ 1993: a. Domestic: The domestic sewer service charge for each single family dwelling unit serviced by a separate water meter shall be $11S. eo 17.00 per month; b. Domestic: A monthly sewer service charge for other parcels of real property used for domestic purposes as herein defined, and serviced by a water meter shall be at the rate of $~ $1.71 per each one hundred cubic feet of water usage by such parcel, but in no case less than $16.00 17.00 per month, nor more than $16.00 17.00 per dwelling unit per month; c. Commercial and industrial: A monthly sewer service charge for premises used for other than domestic 1 /7-- / / purposes shall be at the following rates per each one hundred cubic feet (HCF) of water usage: Low strength: $~ 1.56 per HCF water usage Medium strength: $~ 1.92 per HCF water usage High strength: $~ 2.59 per HCF water usage Low strength is defined as wastewater with suspended solids content under 200 parts per million (ppm). Medium strength is defined as wastewater with at least 200 ppm but less than 600 ppm suspended solids. High strength is defined as wastewater with suspended solids content of 600 ppm or more. Unless otherwise established by an approved variance, wastewater discharge shall be assumed to be 90 percent of water consumed. Therefore, where commercial or industrial facilities are billed on the basis of wastewater discharge, the regular sewer service rate shall be divided by .90. Wastewater strength categories will be determined using either the table, "Proposed User Classifications and Assumed Pollutant Concentrations" (SEE APPENDIXES) or actual sampling results, as determined by the Director of Public Works. Dischargers who believe that their total suspended solids concentration is sufficiently low to qualify for a different category of sewer service charge billing may apply to the City Manager in writing for a variance in accordance with Municipal Code section 13.14.130. When there is a change in the rate payer, the category will be re-evaluated. d. Tax Bill: Charges for multiple family and commercial industrial discharges collected on the Tax Bill shall be based on a recent 12 month water usage period. e. High Volume Dischargers: Premises which discharge over 25,000 gallons per day (gpd) are classified as high volume dischargers. These dischargers shall be billed bi-monthly by the City of Chula vista. Wastewater discharge shall be assumed to be 90 percent of water consumed, unless established otherwise by an approved variance. A separate suspended solids concentration shall be determined for each discharger based on either the table, 2 J 7"/.)... "Proposed User Classifications and Assumed Pollutant Concentrations" or on actual sampling results, determined by the Director of Public Works. The bi-monthly rates shall be as follows: Number of cubic feet (in HeF) of water usage x {$1.2179 51.2940 + (suspended solids concentration in p.p.m. x $9.991956B SO.0020791)} (Sewer service rates are as listed above unless superseded by ordinance) 2. Penalty for Delinquent Payment of Sewer Service Charges The fee for delinquency in payment of the sewer service charge shall be a basic penalty in an amount equal to ten (10) percent of the service charge, plus one and one half (1-1/2) percent per month for non-payment of the charge and basic penalty. (Designated herein for administrative convenience only) 3. Sewer Service Charges for Low Income Households Low Income Households (as defined in Chapter I) including renters of property who are eligible to receive a reduced rate for monthly sewer service charges, shall be billed at the rate of $11.20 11.90 per month per EDU. The Finance Department of the City shall make available the required application form and process all applications. Application will require the submittal of information on total household income, the number of persons in the household and the type of dwelling unit. Proof of total annual income shall be furnished. Requests for annual refunds shall be made by eligible households between August 1 and September 30 of each year for the past fiscal year beginning in July and ending in June. The applicant will be notified of eligibility status within thirty (30) days of application and if eligible, the refund forwarded within ninety (90) days of application. (Designated herein for administrative convenience only) 4. Sewer Service variance Fees The owner or occupant of any premises requesting a variance from the sewer service charges pursuant to the provisions of this section and the rules and regulations approved by resolution of the city Council shall pay a fee in the sum of $150.00 to cover the cost of investigation of said request; provided, however, that no fee shall be charged for a request for total exemption 3 J 7--/3 from the sewer service charge. In addition, a special handling charge to cover the cost of billing and inspections to be paid per building may be established in the resolution granting the variance, provided that the minimum such charge shall be in the sum of $3.75. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $1,856,000 is hereby transferred from Fund 222 to Fund 225, which amount represents $199,000 approved for Fiscal Year 1992-93 plus an additional $1,657,000 ($729,000 more for 1992-93 and $928,000 for 1993-94). Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works F:\home\attomey\sewinc.fee 4 J7'1'-/ ed ity r ~:Q :-1:' (. . t~ ;':~l~' ,}I ~: )il ;~~ "1!l" ~>.,i Jj i;~~ :;qr~ ,..:;~~: .":~)~ -',~ -,I{! 'J-'! -~~ i "~'~ V"'''''''< '~ ~~, ~:!~.;;i; ,',!',~ ,,3. :'* ~'~ ~ \:~~ , , , 'tj,>f i ~l 'I ! tll ! ,J NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for consideration of an item to raise monthly sewer service charges. The increase in rates is necessary to finance Chula Vista's share of upgrading the San Diego Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro) with water reclamation, a program estimated to cost about $1.5 billion. Staff will present options that would raise rates for single family dwelling units from $0.00 to $2.23 per month. The staff recommendation for single family dwelling units is to raise the rate $1.00 to $17.00 per month. Rates for multiple family, mobile homes, low income and commercial/industrial properties will be raised by the same percentage as the single family rate. The low income rate for qualified residents is 70 percent of the single family rate. In addition to the sewer service charge, a storm drain fee will be included with the sewer service charge as follows: Single Family & Low Income $0.70/month or $8.40/year Multiple Family & Commercial/Ind. $0.06/HCF of water used SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, at 6:00 pm in the Council Chambers, Public Service Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 29, 1993 BVH: (BVH/PUBLHEAR .93) /7---/ b ~-\~\-"'-^- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Consider increase in sewer & storm drain fees: sewer rate increase to finance CV's share of SD Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro) upgrade for water reclamation. Single family residential sewer rate anticipated to increase from $0.00 to $2.23/mo. Multiple family, mobilehomes, low income & commercial/residential to be raised by 70% of single rate. Storm drain fees will not be increased. Consider application for conditional use permit submitted by South Bay Community Services to establish short term transitional housing project for homeless families up to 43 individuals @ 31 Fourth Avenue. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 30, 1993 Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk /7~ /7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: City Open Space Maintenance District 10 for Fiscal Year 1993-94 SUBMITTED BY: Resolution Ordering certain open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained and levying assessment for Fiscal Year 1993- 94 for Open Space District NO~~~ Director of Public worksJ (r~ Director of Parks and Recreatio~ City Manager eft 5 & (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..XJ {J REVIEWED BY: Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, public hearing l8"'and ~<tave been separated due to conflict of interest concerns. Council should note that agenda statement _ also applies to this public hearing and includes the information on Open Space Maintenance District 10. RECOMMENDATION: That Council conduct the public hearing and approve the resolution after the second public hearing on July 20, 1993 is conducted. 008:08-001 F :\home\engineer\agenda\ 1 070.93 /8'-/ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: City Open Space Maintenance District Nos. 1-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, 24 and 26, and Bay Boulevard, Eastlake and Town Center Maintenance Districts for Fiscal Year 1993-94 SUBMITTED BY: Resolution Ordering certain open space and maintenance facilities to be maintained, approving modifications to the Engineer's Report and levying the assessments for Fiscal Year 1993-94 for Open Space District Nos. 1-9, 11, 14, 15, 17, 18,20,24 and 26, and Bay Boulevard, Eastlake and Town Center Maintenance Districts \,\ u ) Director of Public works/l~, Director of Parks and RecreatioRfA City Manager &I~(,. (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..xJ of., REVIEWED BY: In accordance with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the open space districts. The reports were accepted and the required public hearings were set by Council at its meetings of May 25 and June 1, 1993. This agenda statement includes information related to the above districts and Op,en Space District 10 which is a separate agenda item. As such, it covers both agenda item numbers ~ and?:t RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution after the second public hearing on July 20, 1993 is conducted. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: Assessments On May 25 and June 1, 1993, the City Council approved the reports for the City Open Space and Maintenance Districts prepared by the City Engineer or under his direction and set July 13 and 20, 1993 as the dates for the public hearings. The reports cover the following districts: 1. Open Space District Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17, 18,24 and 26 2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20 3. EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts /9-/ Page 2, Item~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 The individual assessments proposed at the May Council meetings for Fiscal Year 1993-94 as they compare to last year are shown below: TABLE 1 $69,433 12% 8,077 327.94 -1% 41,648 250.90 -24% 31.863 197.08 7% 41,387 226.58 224.22 -1% 27,354 128.00 128.00 0 20,736 72.12 87.60 21% 9,110 408.00 430.94 6% 47,403 93.62 92.88 -1% 35,667 83.46 25.96 -70% 16,366 75.18 120.00 59% 158,524 81.22 8% 107,278 323.20 319.94 -1% 279.426 254.74 .32% 222,472 220.54 234.24 6% 13,352 146.36 124.74 -15% 5,738 282.48 303.34 7% 117,562 246.28 203.72 -17% 438,812 680.26 486.00 -29% 19,440 211.00 -69% 8,439 N/A 359.00 N/A 6,821 1,031.60 1.000.80 -3% 10,008 40.94 43.58 6% 43,579 6.76 6.98 3% 69,495 6.76 10.64 57% 20,394 (lper benefit unit (~eserve is at 10% (3)Reserve exceeds 50% These assessments are based on the budget approved by Council on June 15, 1993. /9-.)... Page 3, ItemA Meeting Date 7/13/93 Districts 1, 11, and EastLake MD l' s increase in assessment is due in part to new open space areas being turned over to the District for maintenance: a. District 1 includes an additional 6 acres of open space dedicated by the W oodcrest Southwestern Subdivision. b. District 11 includes an additional 4 acres of open space dedicated by the Brehm and Woodcrest Terra Nova Subdivisions. c. EastLake Greens' increase in assessment is due to the anticipated turnover of additional medians within the Greens' boundary. Typically, new improvement costs are added to the district at the same time the new property owners are assessed. However, in these districts, the homes were assessed prior to turnover of the maintenance of new improvements. Effectively then, the assessments in prior years were lower than anticipated. A summary outlining the increase and decrease in assessments is provided in Attachment C. Modifications to the Engineer's Report On June 22, 1993, Council approved the award of the open space district maintenance contracts. Several of the bids received and approved were lower than the existing contracts which provided the basis to determine the assessments in May. Staff recommends that the assessments be adjusted downward for Districts 3, 11, 14 and 24 whose contract costs are substantially lower than last year. The proposed changes in assessments are shown in Table 1. OSD 24's, Canyon Views, contract cost came in $7,131 lower than estimated due to effective bid clustering and the current economic climate. Additionally, staff proposes to reduce the reserve amount by $3,800, as a compromise to the property owners in that district. This district had substantial savings during FY 1992-93 because of delayed turnover and some owners wanted all the savings to be passed on to them in one year and others preferred the savings be used to stabilize the assessments over 2 to 3 years. Staff recommends that the assessment be lowered to $211/home with a 90% reserve, $7,711 retained to offset future assessments. Without the savings being used to lower the assessments, the assessments would be $482/home. Additionally, staff recommends other changes to Open Space Districts 1,4 and 20 and Bay Boulevard Maintenance District. The proposed changes to Districts 4, 20 and Bay Boulevard do not affect the assessments. OSD l' s proposed change in assessment is a result of lowering the reserve required. The change reflects a reserve based on 50% of the existing maintenance costs plus 10% of the supplemental costs to be collected over a period of 5 years. Staff initially based the reserve on 50% of existing and supplemental maintenance costs. A small contract cost decrease is also reflected in the assessment. 19..J Page 4, Item J? Meeting Date 7/13/93 OSD 4's contract cost has increased by $6,754 as a result of bids awarded in June. It is recommended that this cost be offset by using that portion of the reserve in excess of the 50%. Consequently, the assessment proposed for FY 1993/94 will be the same as the assessment proposed in May and for which property owners were noticed. However, an increase in assessments can be expected in FY 1994/95. A budget amendment for this district will be brought forward during the year. A minor change is proposed for Bay Boulevard Maintenance District which reflects a decrease in the estimated fund balance which is offset by a decease in the reserve amount. There is no net change to the assessment as proposed in May. Staff has prepared the following summary to be incorporated into the Engineer's Report for Open Space District No. 20 pursuant to Section 22660 of the Streets and Highways Code: TABLE 2 Rancho Del Rey Open Space District No, 20 Annualized Costs Amount Accumulated FY 93-94 Zone Description (90/91, 91/92, 92/93) Amount Work Description 1 Desilting basin $101,541 $33,847 Desilting basin maintenance (every 5 years) 2 Rice Canyon 20,100 6,700 Stabilization structures maintenance (every 3 years) 2,619 873 Staging area - AlC overlay seal and stripe (every 5 years) 684 228 Staging area maintenance (30-year period) 3 East H Street 0 0 4 SPA I Phase 1 12,006 4,002 Monumentation replacement (30-year period) (Business Center 5 SPA I Phases 2-6 115,881 34,617 Theme wail & monument replacement (30-year period) 6 SPA 2 0 0 7 SPA 3 0 0 The Code requires the breakdown outlined in Table 2 for estimated costs amortized over more than one year. Certain costs are being spread over several years because of the impact on an assessment which would occur if the costs were spread over one fiscal year only. A summary of all districts and as modified is provided in Attachment A. /9-'1 Page 5, Item~ Meeting Date 7/13/93 Noticing Pursuant to the 1993 notice requirements of the 1972 Landscape and Lighting Act, staff noticed all property owners of Open Space District Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17, 18,20,24,26, and Bay Blvd., Eastlake and Town Centre Maintenance Districts of their proposed assessments on the postcards mailed for noticing the public hearings and the informal staff meetings held on June 19 and 21. The notice of the public hearing was published pursuant to Government Code Section 6063. Summary of Informal Meetings Staff from the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments held informal meetings on June 19 and 21 to discuss the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 1993/94. Several questions were answered at that time regarding the assessments and the components affecting the assessments. A summary of issues is presented in Attachment B and letters of protest are presented in Attachment D. FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. All City staff costs are reimbursed by Open Space District Funds. Attachments: A - Summary of costs and assessments J J B - Summary of informational meetings j C - Summary of assessment increases and decreases D - Letter(s) of protest NOT SCANNED WPC F:\bome\engineeilagenda\1066.93 /9:5' .1,. .. ....~ . f .'(. . . - ;;; ~ ~ = ~ == - ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ::: ~ - ~ - ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~!ii! -~ :: =~~ = - - ~~ ~ - ~ ~- ~ ~ = ~:::;::: :2 ~ ~ - ~ - ~!E ~- ~.....,,- :z2 ~~ ~ - ~fi - e:.;;o:a ~~ ~ - ~ ~= - - ~ ~ :2 ~ ~ :s.:=: ~ ~= - - - ~ ~ ~ =e' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ - e;:::: ~e: ~~ ~ - ~ ~= ~~~ =e' ~~~ ~ ~- ~ ~ = ~ - -- E:e;::: -~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~'ii ~ - - e;~r-I =e' ~= - ~ = ~ = ~ ~ -=---- ~~~:= ~~2~ ~~~~ ~ ~- !ii - = - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - ~ : - - ~ - - - - :i - - - - - - ~ -. ~ ~ - - - o - c:. N - - - -~ :;:;:;; ~ ~ - - - - - ~ - ~ - - - o ~ - - :;: - ~ - - ~ - ~ - - ~ - - - - ::;: ~ :g:=~ c:>ooc:>o ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ - -- coco-=:: ~C:c> ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ gg~ -~~ - - ~- - - :;;: ~ - - ~ :€ - - - - - - :::~ - -- Co_~ ~;e- :::;. - - o :;0 - -- - -- ~~5 - - -~ - - - ~ - :;; ~ ~gg ~~~ - - -~ - - - - ~ ~. - - - ~ ~. - ~g:g """::=:c::o ~ ;:::; - - ~- - - - - ~ ~ g :<: "':. ~ ggg g~~ - ~ ~g~ - -- ~ - - ~ - - - on :;: -- - - :i - ~ - - - - 0_ - ~ - - ::::: - - ~- - - ===- :;. -~ - - - - ...:- ~~ ;~ - -- c:::eo- c:oC:c:>o ~::;;N - - - - _0 - - o ::: ~ - - o ~ ~. ~ - - -- --c: C:oc:>o - -- ~ ~ - - - - ~ - - ~- - - - ~ :;; ~ - ~ - ~ ~. ~ ~ - - -- - -- _c:o. =~;:e - -- c:-c: _.0_ - ~. ~ - - o l;! ...; ~ ~ :: ~ U'2 ... ~_ 2 ~ ~ ... ... c:: ~ ~ 0_ .. .. c...o ::= EO en ~ a .~ - :E ~ - ~ ~ - - - - ~;:;; = =~~ ~ ~- ~ .;;: ~ ..... "E - ~ a ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - - ~ - ~ - ~ l:. .~ ..... - ~ 0:: ~ ~U'2 ~ ;: -0 .~ ~ E ~ - ~~ ~ ~ .:!:- .=: : ~ - ~ e .'!: - ~ -- a _ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ::: - - - - ~ ~. ~ ~ - - ~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ - - ~- ~ - - - ~ - - - ::: - - ~ - ~ "':. - - ...: - "l. N~ - - - ~ ...; ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ - - - ; - - c:c::: - ~ - ~ ~c:. ~ ~ .. ~ - - ~ ~ ~ :; ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~- - - o - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - ,;: ~ ~ ~ - - - - o - - ..;. :::: ~ - - - :;: ~ ...; ~ ~ - - ~~ - - - ~ :: ...:- - - - :i ... ~ ~ - - ~~ - - - ..; ~ ~ ... ~ - - :::: ~ ... ~ - - -~ - - - -~ ..;~ ::..::: ::::: ~ - - ~~ - - - ..: l;! ~ g ~ =' ~ ~ ~ ~g o - ~ g ~ ~ ~ - - :::: - ... ~ ~ - - ~ - o - - :C -. ~ -~ - ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ - - - ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - ..; ~ ~ ~ ~ - -- ---=: o ~ ~ ~ ::::- - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ - ~ ;-~ _ 0:: _ ... ~ ::... ~ ~ ~~i;'=!ii <III: :os .... _ .. "'"" -=_.... --= ~ ~ ~ _ _ a... .. _ en "'"" c:: c..... !~~~~~ 5'='=:';; - ~ ~ ~ ~ .:; - /9-" g ~t ~ ::: - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ -c:. ~ ~ - - ~ ~ :;0 :;; - - - ~ ~ ~ .. ::;: - - a ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - ..; ~ "':. ~ - - - ~ ~ - ... - - - ...: ~ '":. ~ ~ - ~ c: ~ ~ ~= :5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 5; - - ~ - -~ == ::: - - - ~~ - - :;: - - =:::: ~~ - - ~ ~ - - - - =~ =;: :::: ~ - ""~ - ~ E5 ;;:: - - - ~ g~ ~ ::::: :;:::: ~6 ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ ...:- ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ - ~ ~ - - - ~ = - ~ - ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ = = -- $~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ - g:: ~ ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ -:' C;:~ !;:!; - :::: , - ":~ ~~ - - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~- :::: ~ ~ ""- ;~ -- ~ - - - ~ ~ -:0; =- :::: g~ ...: ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~:;; ~ - ':' ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~a :::: ~ ~ ~ ~ ..;~ ::: ~ ~ - ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ ;s ~ - ~ - ~ - ~ - -e - ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ $i;5 ~ ~ ~= = = - - :5:5 ~ ~ - - - - _ a -- ~~ .. ~~..... ~~~ ~~;;: = ~ ~:z~ ~~.; =-::=!= ~=~ ~~ ~ - - --- ~~~> =~~... ~~:= .; ~ .. ~ ~ - ::::;~~ ~~ = ~ = ~ .. ~ -.- -- ~e:;.....t--I ~%2 ~::e~ ~ = ~ - = ~ .. ~- e;~~ - .. - ~= .; ~ .. ~ ~ - e;::::: ..~ ~~ = ~ - .. ~ ~ .. ~ := ~ ~ - = - - - ~ ~~ ~ - - e;:=~ ..~ ::e~ = ~ ~ - .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ S ~ ;;;: ~!fi ~ ~ - ~:=:::: ..~ ~~ = - = ~ .. ~ ~~~:; ;:~~ ~g;;;;;; ~ ~ - - ~ .. ~ - = - - = - ~ ~ - - - - - ~ - - ~ - - = o ~ :€ - - - - ~. ~ - - -c: - - ~~ ~ - c: ~ - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - ~ - - c: - ~ :;: - -- -c::c::: - -- - ~ ----- -c:<=:-- ----- ~ _ 0:0 r-.I - - - ----- ---=:c:- :e:~~~~ :::: ----- -c:::---=: ::=;~~;~ - - - - :;: ~ ~ - g o :>: ~ - - - - ~ ~ - - c: - ~ - - - - c: ~ ~ E - c: - ~ ~ ~ - - - - ~ ;:; - c: - - - ~ - c: - - ":. - c: - ~ - - - - - ..; - -- --=:c=: ~~~ - c: - - ":. - ~ - -- -=--c:: 0__ ~~= - - ~ - c: ~ - - - -c: - - :: - - c:- ~~ ~ - - - - c:. ~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - - ~ -:. ~ - c: ~ ":. - - c: - - ":. :::: - c: - ::;: ~ - - - - ~ - - o ~ - c: - ::: - - c:- -i - ~ - ~ - c: - ~ - - - - - - - - - - 0- - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - cq~ - - - ~ ~ ;: - - ~ - - ~ ~ - c: - ~ - - ~ - - c: - - - c: - - ~ ~ - g - ~ ;: - c: - ::: ~ - - - ~ -. ~ ~ - - c: - ~ ~ - ~ ;: - c: - - - '" - - c: :;: -. ~ - - - ~ - ":. ~ /9-7 ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ ~ - - ...; - ~ - ~ - - - - ~ ~ ~ - -- c:-c:: - - ~ ~ - - ~ c: = - - ":. - - ~ - - ...: :;; ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ":. ~ ~ - ~ c:~ ~ ~ ~. - ~ ~=~ ~ - ~ - ;::; - - - = ;;; - - ~ - - ..; - ~ ~g - - - ~ ~ - :::: gg 0- - - c:- - - N~ ~= - c: - - - .; ~ ~ - c: ~ - '" ~ - ~ - - ~c: - - - ...; - -. ~ ~ - - - - ~.,,; :::~ N..o - c: ~ ~ ~ - - - c:- - :;:: - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ ~ ::; - c: - - - - ;: - c: - ~ - ~ - - - ~ ;;; - ~ - - - - N ~ - - - ~ - ~ - ~ - - - ~ -:. ~ - ~ - -. ~ ::: ~ .~ ~ ~ - -~ .. - - ~ ~:: ...;- - - - - ~ - - - ~ o - ~ -c:. - - = - ~ - = 0: ~ - - - - ~ - ~ ~- ~= ~ = ~- -r-: ...;~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~'"'; ...;~ - - ~ ~ - - ~ - - ~ - ~ ..;...; == :;:; ~::!: --~ E.. ~ '"-: ~ - - - - - ~ ..,....; ~ ~ ~~ ~ .. ~~ .. .. (;; ~ - o:~ - ~ ~ - - ~ , - - - - _0 ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ = ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ ::: ~ - ~ , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~o - - - ~ - - r:::: , ~ - = - i ~ - ~ - ~ - ~- :;;:::;; ~ - - - - -d :::: -. - - ~ - - ~ - -..; ~'S :::: ~ , =~ NeD ~~ .:.: ~~ -~ - ~ i~ ~ - ~ ::; V> ~ ~ = - ~ '" - ~ <=> .., - <=> <=> - 0- ". ~ <=> <=> '" ~ '" .., ~ <=> '" '" ~ '" - ~ s:: .., N ~ '" ~ N - .., ~ '" - N => '" ~ => ~ <=> 0- '" <=> <=> <=> ~ <=> '" ": N .., .., <=> <=> 0- ~ - ~ ~ .., <=> <=> N ..... N - ~ 0- N ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ => '" <=> ~ ~ ~ <=> '" - <=> <=> ": ~ ": <=> 0- !t ~ '" ~ ::: .., <=> ~ ,.., ..... ~ '" 0- io: - ~ '" ~ '" ~ ~ '" - <=> N N ~ <=> ~ ~ !t => 0- '" ~ <=> <=> .., - ..... '" ~ ,.., - .., .., .., '" ,.., '" '" ~ .., ~ <=> .., '" 0- Z :- ,.., N ,.., N ,.., '" ,.., - ~ '" ~ '" .., .., - ,.., '" <=> <=> - = .., ~ .., .., '" '" - '" ~ ~ .., ~ - ~ .., !t '" N N ~ N '" :- - .., = ...... ,.., ~ ~ .., .., 0- '" ~ ~ .., ,.., .., N = - ~ ~ '" <=> - - N .., 0- .., 0- ~ '" '" = N = .., .., ~ <=> <=> ~ ~ ~ N N .., '" '" ~ - '" ~ N = = '" '" = N <=> ...... - N ~ ~ '" = = = <=> ..... '" - ~ = N ~ '" ..... '" = .., .., ~ <=> '" ~ - - '" ~ '" '" <=> ,.., ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" .., .., <=> '" = '" ~ = - 0- ..... :- = = .., N = <=> '" '" ~ - = .., - '" % = '" .., .., .., - N - ~ <=> '" N .., = '" => '" N ~ .. '" '" '" = = .., .., = = ~ - ..... - - ,.., - - '" 0- '" .., '" = ,.., N = - = ~ N N 0- ~ 0- ..... ,.., <=> - .., N N N '" 0- => .., .., ~ '" Q. C - .~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ .. Q. '" C .. % C ~ - ~ ~- C ~ .~ C '" .. ~ . '" - ~ % ~ ~ C _ N .. .~ .. - "Q... ~ u ~ .. .. ..... .. .~ ~ . Q. Q. Q. '" .. '" '" '" '" '" '" '" N ~ .., ...... '" ,.., .., % ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .. ~ Z '" Z Z '" Z Z ..... ..... S <=> S S S S S <=> ..... ~ ..... .. /9--Y- = ~ C> C> C> C> ~ ~ c: C> C> C> ~ Z "" C> C> C> C> ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" '" ~ C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> U U C> C> C> C> "" C> C> C> C> C> c: c: C> C> C> ~ c: c: C> c: ~ 0 ~ = z '" C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> Z C> C> C> C> ~ Z - N - ~ - ~ '" - ~ - - - '" ~ '" - ~ - N '" N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "" '" ~ "- <D - "- - '" '" ~ '" '" N ,.., ~ ,.., - C> '" - ~ Z - ~ ~ ~ - C> '" ~ ~ ~ ~ .,; ....; ~ Z ~ C> ... N - C> C> ~ '" "" C> N ,.., '" ~ ~ ~ - ~ N <D ~ ~ ~ .0 ~ ,.., - - ~ -~ - ,.., ~ - ,.., C> - N N N - - + C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> "" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ C> C> '" '" C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> c: C> ~ - c: - ~ C> C> ~ ~ Z 0 ~ ~ .,: Z "" C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> C> ~ ~ ~ Z ~ - ,.., ~ C> ~ ~ .0 ~ ~ '" ~ N :2 C> C> '" - - C> 0- ... '" "" ,.., N ~ - ... 0- C> ~ '" ~ = N ~ C> 0- ~ N ~ N - - - N ~ ,.., - - 0- C> - ~ '" "" ~ C> ~ _ 0- '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ '" ~ - ,.., '" ~ 0- ~ ,.., N 0- 0- ~ ~ ~ N - ~ '" 0- "" 0- - - - ,.., ~ '" '" "" - - - ~ - - - '" "" ~ - "" ~ '" ~ ... ~ ~ ~ Z ~ u ~ = => Z ~ ~ -;;; "" ~ U ~ ... => ... '" ~ .;; ~ Q C> '" ~ ~ U C> ~ ... C .~ ~ U ~ Q ... ~ =- :;; ~ .~ = .. U "" ~ ~ ... ~ U Z ~ ~ '" C> ... .. .. - .~ "" C .. = '" ... .~ ~ .. U U > ... Z .. > .. ~ ~ '" ~ .. .~ .~ .~ C ~ .. ~ . ~ U = "" = ~ U .. C > ~ Q .. .~ ~ .. .. C ~ ~ "" .~ . .~ ~. ~ .~ .~ '" ~ Z ~ ... .. ~ ~ ;!; ~ '" !!:: > .. ~ .. ~ ~ .~ ... :< .~ .. -;;; Z Z Z <D = "" ~ Q . => '" ~ U -;;; ~ -;;; => ~ ~ '" ~ Z ~ ~ .. ~ '" .. .. Q ~ '" ~ ... '" '" ~ <D '" ~ '" '" ... Q ~ U C . C ~ = .. -;;; '" = Z Z '" ~ ~ Z ~ ... ~ .. ~ '0 Q . .~ C "" ~ '" Z '" ;: '" "" Z ~ , ~ .. ~ .. . .~ Q ... .. '" ~ C C ~ '" C> ~ "- ~ '" , U .~ .. .. .. ~ Q U ... u .~ . Z ~ .. Q => '" ~ ~ '" "" '" '" '" '" .. ~ .~ U U '" ~ ... ~ .. ~ "" > .~ ~ '" ~ =- "" '" '" U '" U ~ .~ ~ .~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ ~ "" ~ "" ~ "" '" "" ~ ~ .. > ~ -- ... .. .. ~"" .. .~ ... <D ~ "" '" '" ~ ~ ~ "" C .~ ~ ~ C ~ U .. Q ~ > ~ <D ~ ... ~ '" ~ = '" ~ '" '" ~ "" '" ~ "" Q ~ .. .. .. .~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ => '" .. ~ .. ~ '" ~ = ~ ~ ~ "" '" "" "- U '" '" '" ~ U '" ~ "- = "" '" ~ "" "" ~ Z ... "" ~ ~ ~ Z "- "" 19,1 Attachment B Summary of Informational Meetings Staff met with various property owners on June 19 and 21 to provide information on the proposed FY 93/94 assessments. Issues raised included: 1. OSD 6 - A property owner suggested that development on both sides of Telegraph Canyon Road be assessed for their open space adjacent to the road. 2. OSD 11 - One property owner was very concerned by the assessment increasing from $75 to $120. Staff has since revised the proposed assessment to $81 based on new bids and adjusting the reserve. 3. OSD 24 (Canyon View Homes) - Staff met with 20% of the property owners in this district. Staff explained that the bid came in low and that their assessment for FY 93/94 would be lower than noticed pending approval by Council. Staff also asked for alternatives from those attending on how to lower the Canyon View assessments on a long term basis. The following is a list of ideas: 1. Annex to Otay Ranch or ? 2. Build more units within their development. 3. Change over to HOA. 4. Adjust lot lines of residential lots into the open space areas for private maintenance. 5. Status quo (City staff offered this alternative). 6. Annex into Eastlake's HOA. 7. Landscape changes. 8. Create Scenic Corridor District. Most owners indicated that if their assessments' were close to the average, they would be satisfied. DDS:rb (F:\HOME\ENGINEER\LANDDEV\INFOMTG.DDS) 19-/tJ ATTACHMENT C-1 At the meetings of May 25 and June 1, the following summary of assessments was provided: Decrease in Assessments Open Space Districts 3, 5, 9, 10, 14, 17, 20 (SPA 1 residential), 24 and Bay Boulevard assessments are decreasing from last year. This is due to one or more of the following: 1. There were minor budget decreases mostly because of adjustments to staff services. 2. There were unanticipated savings experienced during May and June of 1991 due to water allocation programs in response to the drought. Consequently, the FY 91192 assessments did not reflect the savings. However, a portion of these savings were reflected in FY 92/93 assessments and a portion are also reflected in the FY 93194 assessments. Not all savings were passed on to the property owners in a single year's assessment in an effort to flatten peaks and valleys. This is consistent with Municipal Code, Section 17.07.030 which allows accrual of a reserve up to 100% of the budget. In addition to the above, Districts 10, 17, 20, and 24 had other unanticipated savings during FY 92/93 as outlined below: 1. Open Space District No. lO's assessment for FY 93194 is substantially lower than FY 92/93 assessment. This is mostly due to assessing the property owners in previous years for new maintenance associated with the Ladera Villas Subdivision and the turnover not occurring at the time anticipated. In addition, the actual cost was less than that estimated by the developer and used to determine the prior assessments. A portion of these savings are reflected in the proposed assessment. 2. Open Space District No. 17's decrease is due in part to a decrease in the budget item for City staff services (-4%) and a corresponding decrease in the reserve (-2%). The balance of the decrease is due to savings from prior fiscal years which are being used to lower the assessments. 3. Rancho Del Rey Open Space District No. 20's base assessment for FY 93/94 is substantially lower than FY 92/93 assessment because of assessing property owners an entire year for new maintenance associated with "Phase 5" improvements and the turnover not occurring at the time anticipated. 4. Canyon Views' (District 24) assessment is decreasing from last year's assessment of $680 per home. The decrease is due to assessing the homeowners for FY 92/93 in anticipation of the slopes being ready for turnover in January of this year. However, the slopes have not been accepted yet and it is not anticipated to occur until next fiscal year. Staff recommends that only part of the savings beyond that needed for the 50% reserve /9-11 ATTACHMENT C - 2 requirement be used to lower the assessments for FY 93/94. The balance of the savings will be kept in the account to lower future assessments. Increase in Assessments Open Space Districts, 1,2,4, 7, 8, 11, 15, 18, EastLake Maintenance District No.1 and Town Center assessments are increasing this year due to the one or more of the following: 1. Budgets were increased mostly because of an increase in utilities. Specifically, the water service fee has increased. 2. Savings, due to the MaylJune 1991 water savings, were used in part to lower the 92/93 assessments and are not being used to lower to 93/94 assessments. Districts 1, 11, and EastLake MD1 have additional increases due to new open space areas being turned over to the District for maintenance: a. District 1 includes an additional 6 acres of open space dedicated by the Woodcrest Southwestern Subdivision. b. District 11 includes an additional 4 acres of open space dedicated by the Brehm and Woodcrest Terra Nova Subdivisions. c. EastLake Greens' increase in assessment is due to the anticipated turnover of additional medians within the Greens' boundary. The cost of additional improvements is not offset by additional units because most of the units were assessed last year for part of the maintenance of Otay Lakes Road medians. Typically, new improvement costs are added to the district at the same time the new property owners are assessed. However, in these districts, the homes were assessed prior to turnover of the maintenance of new improvements. Effectively then, the assessments in prior years were lower than anticipated. 3. Although Open Space District No. 7's budget is decreasing, the assessments are increasing. This is due to using prior years' savings, in part, to lower the assessments for FY 92/93. Savings are also lowering the proposed assessments for FY 93/94. Without the savings, the assessment would be $104/home instead of $87.60/home as proposed for this coming fiscal year. Both FY 92/93 and FY 93/94 assessments are less than the assessments levied during FY 90/91 and FY 91/92. WPC F:\bome~gine~genda\1075.93 19- /J- , , I. /? .., I _ <:..ko <...14 ~ W.s~ C- (. T-( '--c:) C-\ '^"' e \ '- ___1L~..... <0: -e.::::_~_ Rli>.-4~lA~~~ I""~&..-T_~ ~__ ...::t. Jt~_~O 0; t:.~,h__~~ ~\.~ ~-C 0 c......l\:l.c..l (s. /.h.It'L_ .. -tu~_/~ n S<:...~? ~~~r__E.Q ?!:..__L!'Z.IfI/..vI eN ~c~ -D_~ _th.~~c)t~~---~-~C~ 'QIS~.k:Lc..t' --A:~~.&__s. ,""I_k\~ W cl~ l \,~~.At ~-~ -- A__33/c1 I~. c. ~.~s~...~-~;X. _\~Yi'i.JC--iT-~X: ~J c.t __.IE~ _c..__c",.w~c.\. '- . _L</t, ~ h.~ .... ----bJ._~_~::-c..... -~~ X ~~___le...-\_ - ih. ~ ~ --?l..1!.,-:t_i+~Q-.am _R"C,;__l\le-x--\-_J3'4- ((o_r. -\-c> jt~_~_~__ ~l).t't..s:L.~ -.0_py__!\.=. e l-t-I J-~~---~ .-~.-:-e..~_L~lfLS '"'~ . . _ ~ -Y-U'Z- tL 'B ~KJ ..Q I ~D--= t...~1_--3..&~~_~ -lL.___~__ -eJ....v.- L IA. - vi ~ +4-~____ Grol!j) O$D______70YJD Ctn+er-~____=~~~-_ __~ 1t.7~_'2~_1f3/9'i__ _____~ 7~'!!2,_L!!l9.:l-- _5(dL:J21.!.- If., :00 _ ~~ .. .. _ ___ _ ._______ _ __ ~Jd (., -fJl.C{3____. _u__ I ~ . . - " ATTACHMENT D-' , 19-1.3 ,",-if:", ~:"" : 993 RECEIVED Mr. Barry M. & Linda C. Dodson 13614 Dornoch Drive Orlando, Florida 32823-8802 '93 041-1 A9:46 CITY OF CHULA VIS; 1'. CITY CLERK'S OFFiCi City of Chula Vista City Clerk 276 Fourtll Avenue Chula Vista, CA 919:0 He: Annual Assessment for Maintenance Pl1blic Hearing Dear Sir/Madame: We are the owners of the residence located at 1339 ~resa Grac~,~ Place, Chula Vista, CA 91910. In response to the notice of the city Council's intent to levy the annLal assessment for maintencance of the Open Space District areas, we wish to vote "NO" on the inc;rease of the assessment. As an administrative matter, please change your records to reflect our c:orrect maj !~Jlg address, as follows: Barry M. & Linda C. Dodson 13614 Dornoch Drive Orlando, Florida 32828-8802 Sincerely, ~~ /.7-. Barry M. Dodson ,j '-1J.A e '1~-L~A;l\-, & Linda C. Dodson -Ke7.2B ti:~:; u;.) ~~ (..I.~ c.- o . ,- ..... 0'.'1 . I '. . , 'J ~ , .- :;g . i ,. ~', I ..;:~ W r~l n co W , ...... 1-' OGD :It' I ATTACHMENT D-2 19'-/1 _. -/ 1._' ~. :i?" l t'~ ..J , :it": ',. . . ..- .. ~y , .~ 3 .. OSD 1,5,9,10,17,1E } jNfR'f ,cuS "I ( pr,~tJ , . i i i ~ ..". ; j . . 1..'" IT ..n,ol' " a l71"iIIr- -otI4~:' , ~ '.,.0..... " .A~ ---- -----.-r -4'. I - ~r..1" I , ------.. , .----]11II , I , ~~ I ~ , -, rt-,L - - -- _J__________ -, ITrr l.Lt , I I ..._---- , ------ , ....--- ..1 1 r L-:" 1 ,..----, . C,Tt - -----' , , 1 r? /., r---.J ..e....'..... n I /9-1'" OSD 2,7 ) .. ~\ ~ \,l -j(,i ,. : 'I. .,. , L/~ ~ i , , ,-j..~;"~-_.' ~:,~< ~_!" ,",H ::~\S:i 1.>. "';.I. OSD 3,4.8,11 ~ (f) > <( :5 o lL.. o >- l- e..:> w ::I: I- ~~ lL.. ~ S ollil.'! >:: ~ '" > ~~: ~'" 0"" ~~ Z ~~ " I- ljj~ e..:> h - ~ g: !ll~ ~ ~~ Cl R' ~ W ~~ ~ ~~ a.. ~~ ~ (f) ~ ~d Z ~;r. W i~ a.. ~<l o ~~ '''''. .1.J'.J~lI~.J1f1 , ~, ,- ____ ~i SI ~, -. ~; ~I: I~ "<> .", :!~ !<!" ~~ ~~ ~~ >.~ ~~ ~;r 1::'< l~ n ~~ ~ ~; :.; .. 71 ~! ~ I ~ ;i ; I , ~ i 1A, 1n1f1nflt .", --";';~4 ~..~ ~~ :;.,,~ I. I . f " ~ z ;; z C ~ >- 2: ~ ~ ... 01:1 ! ; I. : 'd ; g ~ ~ :! . .... :! ~ ~ ~ii: II l~ , ir; " ----./ /9 'Ir .: -; .; : ~ : tW~J! , ~ 1. ~ \lll\l ::;: 3 ~; l ~ !: WiW ~~ ~i~~~;~ i.t,:-. <i.::;' , ,', I ~ ! n, ~ ~ ~:.:,;.; ;;;~;~ milI ~ -= ': ';" - . - : ~ =::t!" :: ; . "' ~ , -.- Hm H:m t :. ;:' ~ ; - ~ .= ~ ! J t:,C-; .- ." ,":,:'!: ~ :.; ;0 ~ 7 ~ ~ "t .;:.' ~ ~ :i ":! i~~'~~ 1..11\10'"' >-NOCI\) 5-:59 .e~t! tit;(:::d ,011:2' .>-~ i~I~! ~ "'~ ~ ~~ . >- ~ ~'" -~: o eS~ ~ ~5~;:! Q. i ~ 'i! '" ... ~ - ac OSD (ia I .1! .V . . / u /' " l .:.~> ,0'"[". 'Ii . ~!:;r . . .~{. .. ::: ~ .' ..Cl ...'~.~.'I .N : , ~ .' . /9"' /1 ~ ~ < II " " II, MOe" ~Il. C1 l' ".'..SU..A.. f ) '."l.""~ ., II. "'.r.. C""l II' ....co n d~ ;~:~~~~=.r;, .1, .oe..,.'.... ,jlf'l...t......,,, 1'0 ""I)_'oefP II" ....HLl ''''4 1" ,"rIOl'(" II.. 'UI.I41lun 1'..IlT"'lItH'.. II" ".ooW'''"o.., I"~ .1'",.,." I:: ~:~~;::r'.:i.'~:1 CI tot .0.' U,.... IO""'fC"IlIIO"t I, ~ o \I \\c..... "" ~~('C' ~ ,,~O ~(.-,. ,~ ~ I~ ~~ c j' OSD 14,15,24 , -" t.,,,.. " .," '0.". ,. '0' '.I'It .. "I"," . .. "0" Il.. .. I,," n ..'''Hj , .. ... .'" .. '" u '.' ......~". , " tIO......,., " '">0,,,,. " ,- .It. U'r .. . ~ 0 ( . . _ .". .. 'OOIl~.',,,, .. '.....0". .. .,,0M'00' .. "0" C"L." " "'<'frOM " 10.0 '~I~ .. ..'('.t'lI. -, "O'I.a"OI I"Ch100. -, .'.U'~'I .. ".."." .. " O.I....~ .. .. '" .. " .. .,..,...><:> " .,t.O.' 'I", S" ...;"', " RANCHO DEL REV OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20 , ~ ,...... rJ ._~.- ':~ , . . /9' :2.tJ OSD 20 .... 1 .... ." ..".~ ...,-- ~ .".-- ~..._ wI"- ..- ,- -..... ,",--,'" ..- . .... J1QV\O. ~ . !54).. ','-''''-.-- .....---:.- ...---- IUt..A ViSTA ,IIlI'Ill.Mt ,. -," .",:~" .~~,~.:::..,~:~:'~)., ".".......,"'\..,.."\.l.~ .' "c.,~ :','::~bfi::R~~~~'''j . ".-., '....'K. ""',."," , ..'" '" f" . .."..,l,........l'~f'~n)~\..h .,'...._ "I', -:-.-- . ,'l...'.~ '\ "'0 y.'~ .~\'.;:' "",It ..... :~~'S. " ~ p o o , . . . . .. < , ~ p "C r . 0 . < .. .. . ~ ~ , . 0""10'0" ~... .IL- \~ .J.l- p . .~ --~,."" . . ~ .' ,"-, , 10' ~ ,..,. 'f-' \- \ \ '- I';: \~I"I- ~ 0 \"~ \ \ \~'" ....,; .. n~ fl . --.:---- ..-, ....-- --_..~'!...~ -... , -:..~ " ~.._- \ n 0 i .. ~ d,...l r ., p . ~, ct4\JI." 'iI''\'. ,,, .._.... i/. r . ~ ~ .. ." p . ~ ~ < . S1 to O'\'~ 0." p . .J _ i ~- "i... I" \ " \ ... \ \ ,0 \ \ ."..-- .J. -+-."".. ,,' 1" \::.." \ - 'r" p < n . < ~1. . ., '.' .. ., 0 ;0. 0 ., " 0' 'i .\ 0 ~ ~ ~ -:. . :;. .l' . ~ . " ., '1. - "\"\" ... ......,n. ,I < ~ S1 ~ 'l .. . ~ to f ", 0 ,.. ~ ~ . . . .. . . - o ,....... " -:;:-?'" --T -r -- \ ~. . - \.... . .... ---. " ~~ "" \ '\ \ ' \ : ,,-, I I CI' Y ~- " \ , 014\"" ... , .' . i . ~ . ~ . . < < .. O."IO,OM " .Oti'fUt\..I,.C' .' ~ < 1 .. .' r a , .' M n 0 ~ \:. < .. , . . . ~ . . . >> . , , ~ C,,"'fl[" ,,~t>"'O"" * . .....c. n o . ~ .. . & .... '10 n r ~ ~ o . ,,. . . .; o . o " ~ ,...s c.' ~ .. ., ,,,.t."" "11,,. ..",\,,,,t'l' " . n ~~ .. .. . , . , 19'.2/ TOWN CENTER OSD 26 . ~ . - - - - . 1r l:)1~+ric.t ."'.e II II ST- . BOc..\.nda./', lilt' IIt:#'t"S , ] .eU 'T.A IlItA Iti ~ ~ ~ ~'7'()ZI'2~) - ~ - - ~ -- ~ ..,J ~ ."AYS INN 02J QJ ",,&)rol(' ~ L""~e l:(: :t!: (~~7'021' 38) ~ ).. (2) ll) . , I", -- " I .: l. iOI(' 1 rO - II ~ - If"~S TA<J/?,t:,Io/; .... : (567.021'37) I.:J Ii " Ii CD ~ I I.... ! .L!. \I) I iT' ~ I' ~ Ji " - I! ~ - II - " II' il II ",t:; II - sr. ~f 11 11 - - I - - II I I !. ... CRh'N BY T I r ~[ Z.A.O, SAY BOULEVARD / ~".2,2 - - - - . _. . - -. D.:.rc LIGHTING a LANDSCAPING _ _ .o"! - ! 9 - 89_ _ DISTRICT . ~DED DIAGRAM EAST LAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT CITY COUNTY OF SAN OF CHULA DIEGO, STATE VISTA OF CALIFQRNIA ..... , -, , , . , - \ _.- q l' - All "'Me"...". .AI WYIED ., THE em COUNCIL Of THE ern Of CHULA VISTA. ITA" r:1I CAI.JfIORN&A, ON PAlltCELI op: &..ANO IHOWtI ON TMII.....EJIOBI ".-"."1'NT CMAQAMlIlIAP'. lAIC AlAEUIiIENT .AI LrItID ON TMI _ DAY OF _' ,... lAID AMEHDe .....a....,. DIAQAAIII AND THE""'''' ..lIfT ~ WEIll IIECOIlllUl III _ omcE OF _ CITY DlQtNUA Of TME ern Of CMULA YlITA ON THE _ DAY OF _,1110. IlEFPENCI. IIADI TO THE AaMUIHIfT ROLL f1fCCM1tDC IN ".. OPPM:I. Of THI ern EMQINIP POfII THE IXACT AMOUNT OF IACH ""fni ~"""LaVIID AGAINST IACH PAAOIL OIl LMIO IftOWM OM THIS MllNDID ..,.......INT ~, . ' NO. I o ... - - _I . _ IWlE ftl _ COUIIT'I 01' IAN DeEGO, ....EIIOR 'AACB. IIoVI POIII KT..LaD DlMENSfOIII OF tNDMDUN.. PAM::Il.A. CITY CL.IM. ern Of CHUI.A ...,.... " LEGEND Me: ~ ~.. TMI OPFICI Of TMI em...... Of THE ern 'OF CIIUU WllTA ".. _ DAY OF ,-, L;~;~~~'~1 ZONE A CITY_ CITY Of CIIUU WIlT" _ III _ __ OF _ CITY CUM 01' _ CITY OF QU..A .,.,... TIeI_ DAY Of ,_. <::::) ASSESSMENT NO --- .. ---IINT.-nII:T ".-!'i 111-4.." ... . PUtC&L. NO. CITY CUIlIC . CITY OF CIlUI.A WllTA --- rnoEIT __ l.AIClSCAM: ~CE ---- STJIIIEET l ~""."'l( . TIllE[ IrlIUIT'DWC[ -- a.PfII..DCNTAL I1'1tUT UIKT1NO~ ......". ~ DAY Of' ,. AT _ O'CLOCIC .. _ _"" _ CQIIm' 1oUIllT0II OF _ 'IME COUIIT'I 01' "'" ~, ...... OF c....-_ /9;,{3 E ,mAlICE II"IMTEN&IC[ DtITKT NO. t IHEEY ICI, I 0' . COWlY AUDITOII OF "'" _ COUIIT'I ~MENDED DIAGRAM EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1 CITY OF CHULA VISTA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA .\\~-=-~'~ ~ ~-'_.' ~\\ (\ ~ J ~~ 1\ ----=:::;:, -..,/ /~ ~\\ \\ / / //--- "", .#'\ '\ I 1\.,,=-;)) \~J / ---:::/ "" ~/ I If, '- /.-- '" >// \ I I; /r"~'1/ "-'h/ Ii! / (()/ ),y \\1 I \ \ II /,; \'/ \ \\ ~I I I [I \~ \ I ZONE B I ! ,tL JI II i.! \r=-)F~ 11\ !"! I; Ii ~"~__j:;=~===-~~ Iii ~ 1\ --~ \\ Ii I I~; II \\ I I II \ \ ~ I II \ \ ~"'\ I II \\ "'\~ . I II \" '\\~ I ,.. - - '\ ~ //-~\ '\, // ,~ " II \\ ''\ // '\\ '\~:-.... /:/ ~~ '\ ~ // ,""'---_........,/ .....-:::: --- - -- ~//----- ~../';'/- _ -~ ....1... __ __ OIl.... _ __- --- -- - . REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, ASSESSOA PARCEL. MAPS FOil DETAILED DIMENSIONS Of INDIVIDUAL PARCELl. J9--.2i EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I SHEET NO.2 Of S w. COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item dO Meeting Date 07/13/93 ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing for the Consideration of Granting a Franchise to Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. for Multi-family Recycling Collection Services. Ordinance ~a~Amending Ordinance No. 1993, As Amended, By Modifying the Terms of the Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. Franchise to Require Collection of Recyclable Materials from Multi-family Residences within the City ofChula Vista and to Resell Said Materials. SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Conservation Coordinator ilL!> fl/L--((. City Manager 1"" j (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolL) Referral #2720 At the June 22nd meeting, Council approved the resolution giving notice of intent to grant a franchise for the multi-family recycling program collection services to be provided by Laidlaw Waste Systems and selling July 13, 1993 as the date for the public hearing. As directed, staff has noticed the public hearing in conformance with the Charter-required process for granting a franchise. The report further describes the proposed franchise to allow for Council and public input during the public hearing. RECOMMENDATION: Hold the public hearing, take testimony, close the hearing and place the ordinance on first reading. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Resource Conservation Commission discussed the draft franchise ordinance at their May 19th 1993 meeting and unanimously (4-0-2) supported a motion to recommend to Council that the franchise ordinance be approved. Minutes of the meeting were attached with the June 22nd Council Report. DISCUSSION: At the April 13th meeting, Council approved in concept a proposed multi-family recycling program with collection services to be provided by Laidlaw Waste Systems. On June 22nd, Council approved the notice of intent to grant a franchise to allow for full implementation of recycling at all multi-family complexes in the City (approximately 22,000 residences). The franchise ordinance, as proposed with certain amendments requested by Council at the June 22nd meeting, is contained as Allachment A. The specific amendments requested by Council are discussed in detail further on in this report. .)f) -J Summary of the Proposed Multi-Familv Residential Franchise Laidlaw personnel. A Laidlaw staff member will be assigned to the multi-family recycling program, not less than half-time. Collection. All materials designated under the mandatory recycling ordinance will be collected on a weekly basis. Containers. Each multi-family unit will receive a 6-gallon "apartment recycler" bin; complexes will be provided with an appropriate number of three-yard bins and/or 90 gallon carts, depending on space constraints. Replacement of bins for new tenants (estimated at 20 percent per year) has been built into the estimated program costs. In order to encourage complex owners and managers to ensure that the bins remain with the residential unit, staff has put the following clause into the franchise ordinance: (Section 3 B.3) "Replacement of containers that are stolen and/or damaged shall be made at no cost to the resident at Grantee's discretion, up to one per Unit. If a Unit requires an additional interior container beyond the maximum of two allowed, the property owner, manager or designated agent there of, may purchase additional interior containers from the Grantee at a cost not to exceed the market price of the container and a reasonable handling charge. Grantee will be responsible for keeping records and making them available to the City regarding additional containers requested, and the reason for the request, e.g., damaged, stolen, needed to handle residence recyclables beyond capacity of one container, etc." Education. $.10 per unit (i.e., individual multi-family residence) per month has been allocated for ongoing promotional activities. Laidlaw will conduct the promotional activities under direction of City staff. Term. Similar to the franchise ordinance for the curbside recycling program, the proposed length of franchise will be until the year 2002 (8 year term). However, this term is subject to a two year notice of intent to cancel the franchise that may be given at any time by the City without cause, following the initial three year term of the program. As discussed in the Council report for the June 22nd meeting, Laidlaw has used an average amortization schedule of 7 years, at their risk. They have used a 5-year amortization schedule for interior containers and related start-up costs and have used a 10-year amortization schedule for exterior containers and vehicle costs assuming that the franchise will be extended at least two years beyond the five year minimum and therefore have quoted a $1.50 per unit per month rate charge. Unamortized vehicle clause. As Council may recall, Laidlaw has asked that, if the City decides for some reason to abandon completely its source-separated recycling program (e.g., to go to a mixed-waste system where recyclables are not separated from trash for collection at the curb, but are instead taken to a facility and sorted), at no fault of Laidlaw's, during the initial period of the franchise, that an appropriate rate adjustment 2 eJ~" .2 provision be included in the franchise to provide for any unamortized vehicle costs, due to the specialized nature of the vehicles and the relatively high cost. Laidlaw is amortizing the vehicles over the 10 year period in order to keep costs lower for the program. Staff has included the following clause in the proposed ordinance: "If during the initial period of the franchise, or any extension thereof, the City discontinues the separate collection of multi-family recyclables and reverts to a mixed waste processing system for commingled collection of waste and recyclables, the City agrees to allow a rate adjustment to permit the Grantee to recover the loss incurred on the sale of vehicular equipment specifically purchased to meet the Grantee's obligations under this ordinance. Such loss will be calculated by deducting the realizable market value of the equipment from a reasonable depreciated book value of the equipment at the time of the sale of equipment." Proposed fee. The net charge per apartment unit (Le., individual residence) for the proposed multi-family recycling program is $1.50. Currently, the single-family residential recycling fee is $1.10. As previously outlined, the difference in costs are reasonable and justified because of the higher costs associated with multi-family recycling. As with the single-family curbside program, the rates for multi-family recycling will be reviewed on an annual basis. If the actual costs for operating the program are under what they are estimated, the fee would be adjusted accordingly in the subsequent rate period. The cost of the multi-family program has been derived using the same formula used for the single-family program, where program participants get the benefit of revenues from the sale of materials and credit for the amount of recyclables not going to the landfill. The estimated cost breakdown is contained in the chart below, with a comparison to the single- family recycling program. (NOTE: Estimated single-family material sales and landfill diversion credits were established during the rate review last conducted in August 1992. These components should not be compared directly to the multifamily rate components, which have been estimated based upon expected participation. These estimates would be reviewed yearly based upon actual program data.) Single Family Multi-family Total Service Cost $1.88 $2.00 Est. Materials Sales (0.31) (0.20) Est. Landfill Diversion (0.45) (0.30) County Grants (0.02) (0) Net Resident Cost $1.10 $1.50 Attachment B contains an updated rate survey for multi-family recycling in the San Diego County region. 3 .2.~ -3 Landfill Diversion Credit. The proposed franchise ordinance includes a clause that allows for reducing the landfill diversion credit amount to something less that 100 percent (to be negotiated between the City and Laidlaw) with the intent to provide an economic incentive for Laidlaw towards increasing program participation and success. This was approved by the Council in the single family recycling program and is repeated in this ordinance. It is not binding on Council, but the Council should be advised that this issue could be revisited in future negotiations. Amendments to the Franchise Made bv Council and Proposed bv Laidlaw At the June 22"d meeting approving the resolution of intent to grant the franchise, Council amended the proposed franchise to include a clause that requires Council to vote on franchise fee increases for the Multi-family Recycling Program. Additionally, Laidlaw has requested two minor clauses for the clarification purposes. Franchise fees. Staff included a franchise fee clause in the ordinance similar to that which is contained in the single family curbside recycling program franchise (i.e., starting at 8 percent of gross receipts). However, Council directed that the ordinance be amended to require that any increases to the franchise fee be allowed only upon Council approval. Staff has made the appropriate changes to the clause, as follows: "Additional Franchise Fee - The Grantee, as part of the consideration of this ordinance, agrees to pay to the City an additional franchise fee at a rate consistent with that paid for refuse collection and detailed in Section 4 Consideration of the Franchise, as amended by Ordinance 2104. This rate will begin at eight percent (8%) of the annual Gross Receipts collected by said Grantee within the City of Chula Vista from residents for the Multi-family Recycling Program within the City, and increase by one-half (1/2) percent in accordance with the refuse and sinale-family recyclina franchise fee increases. However. said franchise fee increase must be approved by City Council. Beginning .'\J3ril 1, 1991, the franchise fee shall 13e incroased by ane half percent (1/2%) and one half percent (1/2%) cash I\pril thereafter llntil it reaches a maxiFRl,lFR af ten percent. It is understood that any such increase in the franchise fee by the City shall be cause for the Grantee to increase charges in order to "pass through" the cost of the franchise fee." During the annual rate review process for all of Laidlaw's refuse and recycling services, the one-half (1/2) percent increase in franchise fees is always highlighted for Council's attention so that a conscious decision may be made on increasing the fee and passing the cost through to ratepayers. Council action to add new programs by Laidlaw, at any time other than during the annual rate review period, requires special attention to integrating the new program costs into the overall rate. The next annual rate review, to be brought to Council in the near future, will include refuse, single-family recycling and the recent landfill disposal costs. At that time, if the franchise fee on the total rate is increased from 8 to 8 1/2 percent by Council, Laidlaw has 4 ,)1)"0/ agreed to pay the increased 1/2 percent on multi-family recycling receipts to the City without passino throuoh the increase to the rate paver. This arrangement allows the new program to be implemented in the middle of the annual rate review cycle with no impact on the rate payer. Since franchise fees are calculated quarterly based on gross receipts, it is operationally difficult to separate certain gross receipts to be paid at different franchise levels. In subsequent annual rate review cycles, starting in 1994, the combined rate and franchise fee under consideration will be for refuse and all recycling programs previously implemented. Clarification of educational activitv fundino. Under the terms of the ordinance, $.10 is designated for educational activities. The cost of all start-up promotional materials will be included in this allocation. The cost could be reduced, eliminated or increased in subsequent years should the City not deem it necessary. However, a provision in the ordinance allows it to continue at the City's direction. In the clause below, from Section B.6 of the ordinance, Laidlaw has asked for a clarification of its duties as required for educational activities and the funding source for said activities. Staff believes that it was always the intent of the section and that placing the additional clause in does not deviate from the intent, however, the City Attorney advises that Council should be aware that this is proposed by Laidlaw apparently as a limitation on the source of funds. "The Grantee and the City agree that the main purpose of an aggressive public education program is to increase participation and diversion, as well as limiting contamination of Franchised Recyclables. Beginning in the second year, if, in the City's judgement, it is reasonably determined that the public education effort has not resulted in high enough Program interest, the Grantee will perform reasonable public education activities at the City's direction at a cost to the Grantee not to exceed $.10 per Unit per month. If needed, as part of the educational activities. as determined by the City with input from the Grantee,the Grantee aRE! tt-Je City, the Grantee will develop incentives to increase participation, such as, offering rewards for complexes that have high participation levels and high tonnage levels." Fundino Sources. The Residential Multi-family Recycling Program will be funded by four sources: a monthly recycling fee to all eligible residents (to be billed to the property manager or resident, as with refuse billings); Net revenues from the sale of collected recyclable material; savings in disposal cost of material diverted from the landfill; grant funds when available and awarded. In section 01 (a) of the ordinance, Laidlaw has asked for a clarification that states that the revenues received from the sale of collected recyclables are net and not gross revenues. Staff agrees that the intent of the clause was to be net revenues, as stated in paragraph 01 of the ordinance, and as in the proposed amendment to the ordinance below. "A monthly recycling fee, charged to eligible residents is the primary source of funding for this program. In general, it will be allocated equally among the customer base, as determined by Section 0.2 below, receiving said Recycling 5 __ ..2~ --:..!:> Collection services and will be determined by the Grantee's operating expenses directly attributable to the recycling program, less: revenues received from the sale of the collected Recyclables net of orocessina and brokerina fees, the savings realized in disposal costs of material diverted from the landfill and any grant funds received for the program." FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Multi-family Recycling Program service charges, set at $1.50 per unit per month, will be paid by the rate payers and there will be no direct City cost. The rate includes a proposed 8 percent franchise to be paid to the City, and additional franchise fees to the City can be anticipated at approximately $31,600 per year. Additionally, once the Multi-family Recycling Program is implemented, the City is eligible to receive Tonnage Grant monies from the County of San Diego, in the same manner as for the Single-Family Recycling Program. These grant monies are now budgeted at $7.75 per ton of recyclables collected from residential recycling programs. Currently the City receives approximately $35,000 per year from the Tonnage Grant program. 6 ~IP-t ORDINANCE NO. ,,2.51,:< Attachment A AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1993, AS AMENDED, BY MODIFYING THE TERMS OF THE LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC. FRANCHISE TO REQUIRE COLLECTION OF RECYCLABLE MATERIALS FROM MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND TO RESELL SAID MATERIALS. The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows: SECTION 1: That Section 1 of Ordinance No. 1993, as has been amended from time to time, is hereby amended to read as follows: "Section 1. Definitions. Whenever in this ordinance the words or phrases hereinafter in this section defined are used, they shall have the respective meaning assigned to them in the following definitions (unless in the given instance, the context wherein they are used shall clearly import a different meaning): A. "Aluminum" means recoverable aluminum materials such as used beverage containers, siding, screening, and other manufactured items. B. "Bulky Waste" means large items of solid waste such as White Goods, furniture, large auto parts, trees, stumps and other oversize wastes whose large size precludes or complicates their handling by normal collection, processing or disposal methods. C. "Buy-back Center" means a facility which pays a fee for the delivery and transfer of ownership to the facility of source separated materials for the purpose of recycling, mulching or composting. D. "City" shall mean the City of Chula Vista, a municipal corporation of the State of California in its present incorporated form or in any later reorganized, consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form. E. "Collection" means the act of collecting Solid Waste materials, or Recyclables at Residential, commercial, industrial, or governmental sites, and hauling it to a facility for processing, transfer, disposal or burning. F. "Contract or Franchise Agent(s)" means any person or entity designated by the City Council pursuant to Article XII of the City Charter and Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 8.24, as being responsible for ,).1) -7 Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 8.24, as being responsible for administering, directing, supervising, collecting, operating and/or providing for the disposal or transfer of refuse, or the collection and/or processing of Designated Recyclables. G. "Curbside Collection" means the collection of Designated Recyclables from the Residential waste stream from the curb or alleyway. May include single-family, Multi-family residences and mobile home trailer courts that receive curbside collection of refuse or that are otherwise specially designated as having curbside collection. H. "Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Location" means a place designated by the City Manager in conjunction with the Contract or Franchise Agent(s) for pick up or storage of recyclables segregated from other waste material. Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Locations include, but are not limited to, the curbside of a Residential neighborhood; the service alley, loading dock, or basement of a commercial enterprise or Multi-family complex. I. "Designated Recycling Containers" ("Containers") shall mean those containers or receptacles designated by the City Manager or its Contract or Franchise Agent for pick-up or storage of Designated Recyclables. J. "Designated Recyclables" means materials that are recyclable, reclaimable, and/or reusable within the following categories of Residential, commercial and industrial and as defined more specifically herein within each category. Any material having an economic value on the secondary materials market or that is otherwise salvageable shall be included and/or other materials that have been separated from other Residential, commercial, or industrial Solid Waste for purposes of being recycled for resale and/or reuse, and placed at a Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Location or in a Designated Recycling Container for the purpose of collection and processing, or any such Designated Recyclables materials collected under a Mixed Waste Processing program. K. "Exterior Recycling Containers" means Designated Recycling Containers to be used for outside storage of Franchised Recyclables. L. "Franchised Recyclables" means any Residential Recyclables, as defined herein and by CVMC Chapter 8.25, placed in Designated Recycling Containers placed at Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Location(s) to be collected by the Grantee, excluding yard waste. M. "Garbage" means all kitchen and table waste, and animal or vegetable waste that attends or results from the storage, preparation, cooking, or handling of food stuffs, except organic wastes separated therefrom and used in composting in accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 8.25, l ~t/~~ Section 8.35.090. N. "Glass Bottles and Jars" means food and beverage containers made from silica or sand, soda ash and limestone, the product being transparent or translucent and being used for packaging or bottling, including container glass designated redeemable under the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Law, Division 12.1 (commencing with Section 14500) of the California Public Resources Code, as well as glass jars and bottles without redeemable value ("scrap"), but excluding household, kitchen, and other sources of non-container glass such as drinking glasses, ceramics, light bulbs, window pane glass, and similar glass products that are not bottles or jars. O. "Grantee" shall mean Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. and its lawful successors or assigns. P. "Gross Receipts" shall mean all gross operating revenues received by Grantee from the collection and disposal of refuse or collection and sale of recyclable materials. Q. "Interior Recycling Containers" means a small (approximately 6 gallon) Designated Recycling Container to be provided to each eligible residential customer in the Multi-family Recycling program. R. "Landfill" means a disposal system by which solid waste is deposited and compacted before burial in a specially prepared area which provides for environmental monitoring and treatment. S. "Mixed Waste Processing" means a system of recovering recyclables from the mixed waste stream through separation at a processing facility, transfer station, Landfill, or other such facility instead of separation at the waste generation source. T. "Multi-family" means a structure or structures containing a total of 3 or more dwelling units in any vertical or horizontal arrangement on a single lot or building site. U. "Newspaper" means newsprint-grade paper including any inserts that come in the paper, and excluding soiled paper, all magazines, and other periodicals, telephone books, as well as all other paper products of any nature. V. "Nuisance" means anything which is injurious to human health, or is indecent or offensive to the senses, and interferes with the comfortable enjoyment of life or property, and affects at the same time an entire community or neighborhood, or any number of persons, although the extent of annoyance or damage inflicted upon the individual may be unequal, and which occurs as ~ ;),0 ..-1 a result of the storage, removal, transport, processing, or disposal of Solid Waste, compost, and/or Designated Recyclables. W. "Plastic Bottle" means a plastic container with narrow neck or mouth opening smaller than the diameter of the container body, used for containing milk, juice, soft drinks, water, detergent, shampoo or other such substances intended for household or hospitality use; to distinguish from non-bottle containers (e.g., deli or margarine tub containers) and from non-household plastic bottles such as those for containing motor oil, solvents, and other non- household substances. x. "Processing" means the reduction, separation, recovery, conversion, or Recycling of Solid waste. Y. "Recycling" shall mean any process by which materials which would otherwise become Solid Waste are collected (source separated, commingled, or as "mixed waste"). separated and/or processed and returned to the economic mainstream in the form of raw materials or products or materials which are otherwise salvaged or recovered for reuse. z. "Refuse" means Garbage and Rubbish. AA. "Removal" means the act of taking Solid Wastes or Designated Recyclables from the place of generation either by the Contract or Franchise Agent(s), or by a person in control of the premises. BB. "Removal Frequency" means frequency of removal of Solid Wastes or Recyclables from the place of generation. CC. "Residential" for purposes of this Chapter, means any building or portion thereof designed or used exclusively as the residence or sleeping place of one or more persons, including single and multiple family dwellings, apartment-hotels, boarding and lodging houses. Residential does not include short-term residential uses, such as motels, tourist cabins, or hostels which are regulated as Hospitality establishments as defined in Sub-Section U of CVMC Chapter 8.25. DD. "Residential Recyclables" means those specific recyclable materials from Residential Solid Waste (single family and multi-family) including, but not limited to, Aluminum, Glass Bottles and Jars, Newspaper, Plastic Bottles, Tin and Bi-Metal Cans, White Goods, and Yard Waste. EE. "Rubbish" means non-putrescible solid wastes such as ashes, paper, yard clippings, glass, bedding, crockery, plastics, rubber by-products or litter. Such materials that are designated as Recyclable or Compost may be exempt from categorizing as rubbish provided such materials are handled, processed ~ ,,2&-ltJ and maintained in a properly regulated manner. FF. "Scavenging" means the uncontrolled and/or unauthorized removal of Solid Waste, Designated Recyclables or recoverable materials. GG. "To Segregate Waste Material" means any of the following: the placement of Designated Recyclables in separate Containers; the binding or bagging of Designated Recyclables separately from other waste material and placing in a separate container from Refuse, or the same Container as Refuse; the physical separation of Designated Recyclables from other waste material (either at the generating source, Solid Waste transfer station, or processing facility) . HH. "Solid Waste" means all putrescible and nonputrescible solid, semi- solid and liquid wastes, such as Refuse, Garbage, Rubbish, ashes, industrial wastes, demolition and construction wastes, abandoned vehicles and parts thereof, discarded home and industrial appliances, manure, vegetable or animal solid and semi-solid wastes, also includes liquid wastes disposed of in conjunction with Solid Wastes at Solid Waste transfer/processing stations or disposal sites, but excludes: sewage collected and treated in a municipal or regional sewage system or materials or substances having commercial value or other importance which can be salvaged for reuse, Recycling, composting or resale. II. "Storage" means the interim containment of Solid Wastes, Yard Wastes, or Recyclables in an approved manner after generation and prior to disposal, Collection or processing. JJ. "Streets" shall mean the public streets, ways, alleys and places as the same now or may hereafter exist within said City, including state highways now or hereafter established within said City. KK. "Tin and Bi-Metal Cans" means any steel food and beverage containers with a tin or Aluminum plating. LL. "Transfer or Processing Station" means those facilities utilized to receive Solid Wastes and to temporarily store, separate, convert, or otherwise process the Solid Waste and/or Recyclables. MM. "Unit" means an individual residence contained in a Residential Multi-family complex. NN. "White Goods" means kitchen or other large enameled appliances which includes, but is not limited to, refrigerators, washers, and dryers. -s ,2t1J '-11 00. "Yard Wastes" means leaves, grass, weeds, and wood materials from trees and shrubs from single family and multi-family Residential sources (to include landscape haulings from residential sources). 1/ SECTION 2: That Section 2 of Ordinance No. 1993, as has been amended from time to time, is hereby amended to read as follows: " Section 2. Purpose. The franchise to collect and dispose of Refuse and to collect Residential Recyclables, excluding Yard Waste, from single family and Multi-family dwellings within the City of Chula Vista in the manner and on the terms herein specified and to use for such purposes the Streets, ways and places within said City is hereby granted to Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. its successors and assigns. " SECTION 3: That a new Section 22 is added to Ordinance No. 1993, as has been amended from time to time, which new Section 22 shall read as follows: " Section 22. Residential Multi-family Recycling Services Grantee shall provide Residential Recycling services to all Multi-family dwellings within the territory of the City as follows: A. Exclusivity - The City grants to Grantee, for the term herein specified and subject to such terminations herein allowed, the exclusive right to collect Residential Recyclables, excluding Yard Waste, deposited in Designated Recycling Containers (or alternatively, "Containers") located at Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Location(s) as may be identified on each Multi-family residential parcel within the City. This grant of exclusive license is not intended and does not preclude duly licensed non-profit organizations and community groups from conducting recycling programs for the purpose of raising funds, nor does it preclude a person from selling or otherwise disposing of their own Recyclables at a Buy-back Center or for donation, so long as said collection, donation or sale does not occur at the Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Location. However, once the Residential Recyclables have been placed in the Designated Recycling Containers provided by the Grantee, the material ("Franchised Recyclables") becomes one of the subject matters of this grant of franchise. The Grantee agrees to cooperate with the City in reaching a modification to this ordinance to the extent required by law 1. When codified, you can say the following to incorporate other definitions by reference: "Capitalized terms used herein not herein in this Chapter specifically defined shall have the meaning specially ascribed to them as set forth in Chapter 8.25." co ~,,--/.z at anytime it should be deemed necessary in the future. B. Obligations of Grantee 1. Implementation Schedule - Grantee shall commence and diligently implement this franchise Citywide from the date of this franchise so that all multi-family residential complexes in the City have Recycling Collection service by October 1, 1993 in accordance with the City's mandatory recycling ordinance, Chapter 8.25 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2. Collection - Grantee shall furnish said labor, services, mater- ials and equipment required to perform this franchise. Grantee shall provide Collection and Removal services for all Franchised Recyclables subject to the provisions of this ordinance which are placed in Designated Recycling Containers at Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Locations, as defined by the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 8.25, segregated from Refuse, separated by commodity as outlined herein, from all Multi-family residences. Grantee shall collect the Franchised Recyclables not less than once per week and provide any additional Collection as shall be necessary to prevent overflow of the Exterior Recycling Containers, regardless of weather conditions. Collection will be on regularly scheduled days as shall be arranged with the building property owner, manager or designated agent thereof. The Grantee and the City will mutually . agree to any changes in Collection schedule frequencies or Removal Frequency. Grantee will notify the building property owner, manager or, designated agent thereof, of any changes in Collection day(s) by written notification no later than two weeks prior to the affected day, to be enforced nine months from the date of this ordinance. Design of Collection vehicles shall be done to limit the contamination and maximize the resale value of collected Franchised Recyclables. Any and all changes to the established means of Collection of Franchised Residential Recyclables, as herein outlined, shall be notified to the City in advance, including any changes in the way that the Franchised Residential Recyclables are collected (separated and/or commingled), design of vehicles, etc. 3. Containers - Grantee shall purchase and distribute Designated Recycling Containers, to include the following: a. Interior Recycling Containers. An appropriate Container to be used inside 7.. 021) -JJ the Residential Unit, shall be provided to each eligible Residential customer included in the Multi-family Recycling program. The type of Container to be used or changes of Container type shall be approved by the City prior to purchase and distribution. Grantee shall retain ownership of the Containers. Replacement of Containers that are stolen and/or damaged shall be made at no cost to the resident at Grantee's discretion, up to one per Unit. If a Unit requires an additional Interior Recycling Container beyond the maximum of two allowed, the property owner, manager or designated agent thereof, may purchase additional interior Containers from the Grantee at a cost not to exceed the market price of the Container and a reasonable handling charge. Grantee will be responsible for keeping records and making them available to the City regarding additional Containers requested, and the reason for the request, e.g., damaged, stolen, needed to handle residence recyclables beyond capacity of one Container, etc. b. Exterior Recycling Containers. An appropriate Container(s) shall be provided for use at each Multi-family complex that meets the space restraints and Collection needs of the respective complex and the residents therein. Said Containers may include 90 gallon carts on wheels, 2 cubic yard bin or 3 cubic yard bin. Each container shall conform to the following: slots in lids for placement of beverage containers (circular holes of appropriate sizes) and newspaper (narrow slots of appropriate size); plastic containers should include recycled plastic content; be fire resistent; be of durable quality and warranty; be heat stamped or labeled for commodity; be clearly labeled on the lids and the front facing of the bin, in Spanish and English (with graphics) as to the Designated Recyclable(s) and "No Trash"; be clearly labeled with the Grantee's name and phone number. Grantee agrees to provide to each Multi-family complex at least one Exterior Recycling Container per complex for commingled hard recyclables (Aluminum cans, Glass Bottles and Jars, Plastic Bottles and Tin and Bi-Metal Cans) and one Exterior Recycling Container for Newspapers or alternatively at least one, 2- or 3- yard divided bin that effectively separates commingled hard recyclables from Newspapers. To the extent possible, Exterior Recycling Containers will be required to be placed adjacent to or near the Refuse Collection containers. 1 :2/J ., /'1 4. Transportation and Marketing of Franchised Recyclables - Grantee shall transport collected Franchised Recyclables to a central collection and Processing point and shall retain responsibility for the sale of such materials in a timely and efficient manner, so as to yield the highest possible market value for the Franchised Recyclables as collected and in accordance with any Processing contract held by the Grantee. No noncontaminated Franchised Recyclables shall be Landfilled, unless approved by the City. Should market failure occur for one or more material types, only the City Manager (or designee) of the City of Chula Vista may decide not to collect the affected material. All written contracts, if any, with processors, recyclers or other buyers of Franchised Recyclables shall be submitted to the City. Franchised Recyclables that are contaminated due to the placement of Refuse in a Designated Recycling Container, or inclement weather that leaves the Franchised Recyclables unmarketable, may be landfilled. The Grantee shall retain a record of such occurrences and report said occurrences to the City on a quarterly basis. Should contamination occur more than twice at a single complex said complex shall be notified. Should contamination occur at a complex three or more times, the complex shall be notified and charged the necessary disposal fee for dumping the contaminated recyclables as Refuse at the Landfill. 5. Missed Pick-ups - In case of missed pick-up called in by a property manager, owner or designated agent thereof, Grantee shall, where possible, provide Collection within 24 hours. If unable to accommodate due to inadequate notice, the Franchised Recyclables shall be picked-up on the next scheduled collection day and the property manager is to be notified. If the Designated Recycling Containers are overflowing or otherwise creating a Nuisance as a consequence of a missed pick-up, the Grantee is required to provide Collection within 48 hours of notification of missed pick-up. Information on missed pick-ups shall be logged by Grantee and shall be available to the City. 6. Public Awareness Program - The parties hereto agree to work diligently to formulate promotional plans and/or advertising to encourage Recycling in the City and thereby maximize the mutual benefits of this ordinance. The Grantee, in conjunction with the City, is responsible for promotion, education and outreach activities related to the program. The Grantee will prepare an Introductory packet of information regarding the Citywide Multi- g eJ.t) '1-5' family Recycling program and will distribute such packet with the Interior Recycling Containers to each eligible residence. The packet shall include, but not be limited to: a) an informational notice, appropriate for hanging on refrigerator or other location indoors, that details all program elements, Recyclables to be collected, how residents can participate, use of the Interior Recycling Container, proper placement of Recyclables in Exterior Recycling Containers, the City's mandatory recycling ordinance and recycling hotline phone number; b) posters that can be placed in complex laundry rooms, pool areas and other public locations that explain the program, materials to be collected, description of program elements, the City's mandatory recycling ordinance and recycling hotline phone number. All promotional materials shall be developed with the City's Conservation Coordinator's or other designated City employee's advise and consultation, from the first step in development, through the final printing and distribution of materials. No materials shall be developed or distributed without the approval of the Conservation Coordinator or other designated City employee. All Introductory Materials shall be fully translated into Spanish, unless otherwise approved by the City. All subsequent materials shall be fully or at least partially translated into Spanish, unless otherwise approved by the City. All program materials shall utilize graphic representation of Designated Recyclables. The Grantee shall provide to the City a detailed outline of program promotional materials to be developed and outreach activities to be conducted in advance of program implementation. The Grantee will participate in community and school outreach activities during the initial phase of program implementation and provide ongoing outreach activities, to include, but not be limited to, Multi-family tenant and owner associations, community events, media events, make presentations to community groups and businesses on an as needed basis and as directed by the City, and attend County-wide meetings related to recycling, speaking on the City's Multi-family Recycling Program if needed and directed by the City. The Grantee also agrees to reasonably assist in developing incentives to increase participation and tonnage collected, and to encourage involvement of community and youth groups. The Grantee and the City agree that the main purpose of an aggressive public education program is to increase participation and diversion, as well as limiting contamination of Franchised Recyclables. Beginning in the second year, if, in the City's /0 .2~ "J~ judgement, it is reasonably determined that the public education effort has not resulted in high enough Program interest, the Grantee will perform reasonable public education activities at the City's direction at a cost to the Grantee not to exceed $.10 per Unit per month. If needed, as Dart of the educational activities, as determined by the Citv with inout from the Grantee. the Crantee. anE! tlge City, the Grantee will develop incentives to increase participation, such as, offering rewards for complexes that have high participation levels and high tonnage levels. The Grantee agrees to provide technical assistance to property owners, managers or designated agent thereof and work with the City to provide said technical assistance for Program design and implementation. The Grantee agrees to work with the City to provide ongoing Program monitoring services and quality control to prevent contamination of materials and encourage participation to property managers, to include on-site visitations, as deemed necessary by the Grantee and/or the City. The Grantee will provide to the City a quarterly accounting of all outreach activities conducted during the previous quarter. The Grantee will also provide an accurate accounting of all costs associated with Program outreach, to include, but not be limited to, costs for designing of outreach materials, printing of outreach materials, etc. 7. Local Manager - The Grantee shall at all times during the term of this ordinance have a local manager charged with the responsibility for supervision of the recycling operations and obligations of the Grantee and agrees to provide, at a minimum, one (1), half-time person directly assigned to the Multi-family Recycling Program, whose duties are to include: promotional material development and distribution; program monitoring (including on-site visitations); educational outreach to school children; community outreach. 8. Anti-scavenging - The Grantee agrees to provide information to all property owners, managers or designated agents thereof regarding the City's anti-scavenging ordinance and how to report scavenging occurrences. The Grantee agrees to inform all of its employees of the City's anti-scavenging ordinance on a regular basis and how said employees shall report scavenging occurrences. C. Obligations of the City - Subject to the provisions of Paragraph 85 of this ordinance, the City shall have lead responsibility for II 020"/7 directing the development and expenditures of the public awareness activities for the Multi-family Recycling Program. The City also agrees to take such steps as may be reasonably necessary to protect the Franchised Recyclables placed in the Designated Recycling Collection or Storage Containers placed in the Designated Recycling Collection Location(s) for collection by Grantee under the terms of this ordinance and shall reasonably enforce the City's anti-scavenging ordinance (CVMC, No. 2492). If during the initial period of the franchise, or any extension thereof, the City discontinues the separate collection of multi- family recyclables and reverts to a Mixed Waste Processing system for commingled collection of waste and recyclables, the City agrees to allow a rate adjustment to permit the Grantee to recover the loss incurred on the sale of vehicular equipment specifically purchased to meet the Grantees obligations under this ordinance. Such loss will be calculated by deducting the realizable market value of the equipment from the reasonably depreciated book value of the equipment at the time of the sale of equipment. D. Funding and Rates for Collection 1. Funding Sources - The Residential Multi-family Recycling Program will be funded by four sources: a monthly recycling fee to all eligible residents (to be billed to the property manager or resident, as with refuse billings); Net revenues from the sale of collected recyclable material; savings in disposal cost of material diverted from the landfill; grant funds when available and awarded. a. A monthly recycling fee, charged to eligible residents is the primary source of funding for this program. In general, it will be allocated equally among the customer base, as determined by Section 0.2 below, receiving said Recycling Collection services and will be determined by the Grantee's operating expenses directly attributable to the recycling program, less: revenues received from the sale of the collected Recyclables net of Drocessina and brokerina fees, the savings realized in disposal costs of material diverted from the landfill and any grant funds received for the program. b. All collected Recyclables will be sold at fair market value, as outlined in Section 8.3 above, and net revenues obtained from such sales shall be retained by Grantee as an offset against operating expenses. The City shall be notified of I~ ~~~i~ significant changes in fair market values in writing as part of the quarterly reporting requirements. c. Recyclables collected in the Program will be diverted from disposal in the landfill, thereby resulting in a cost savings to the Grantee ("Landfill Diversion Credit"). On a monthly basis, Grantee will determine the recycled material tonnage collected and the resulting Landfill Diversion Credit based on the landfill disposal cost approved by Council for refuse collection rates and will credit this savings during the first year of operation as an offset against operating expenses. When reevaluating program costs in subsequent years, the City agrees to consider Landfill Diversion Credits of less than 100 percent. The amount will be subject to negotiation and the intent is to provide an economic incentive for the Grantee towards increased participation and program success. d. Any grant funds received will be applied to the costs of the Program when award is noticed or during the next rate review procedure if the award takes place once a specific rate has been determined, with the intent of directly reducing the monthly fee to the rate payer. 2. Rates for Collection - it is the City's intent to ensure that the rates charged to the citizens for the Multi-family Recycling Program are appropriate and equitable. The monthly fee of $1.50 per unit will be the established fee for the period of July 1, 1993 through March 31, 1994, billed in the same manner as the refuse collection fee. Specific rate review procedures will be used by the City which are consistent with the procedures used for normal Refuse Collection. Rate review will consider adjustments for actual sale of Recyclables and Landfill Diversion Credits in previous period compared to original estimated amounts. Shortfalls or overages will be used in determining rates for upcoming periods. Rate review will be conducted as referenced in Section 9 of the Franchise as amended, including the amendment created by Ordinance No. 2104, Rates for Collection. An increase in rates for Multi-family Recycling services will be subject to the same limitations and conditions for Refuse Coliection rates listed in Section 9. E. Record Keeping and Reports - Grantee agrees to accurately record collection data sufficient to comply with the reporting requirements delineated below and shall file with the City written quarterly and annual reports of Grantee's performance under this ordinance as follows: ~ ~1J'if:j 1. Quarterly Program Reports - Within fifteen (15) working days after the last day of each quarter, Grantee shall submit a Quarterly Program report to include, but not be limited to, the following: a. Tonnage summaries of all Franchised Recyclables Recovered, by material and including a revenue statement of all sales of Franchised Recyclables from the Program, by material. b. Market price for all Recyclables collected from the Multi- family Recycling Program and sold by the Grantee and/or its processor assignee. The weight receipts and market value for material at the time sold shall be available for inspection by the City. c. Total number of customers served in the Program and resident participation rates in terms of an overall Program average. Any increases to the number of customers serviced shall also be reflected. d. Discussion of problems and noteworthy experiences in the Program operation, to include specifically contamination occurrences, listed by complex. Grantee agrees to monitor each complex at least once per year in order to reflect general participation by complex residents, contamination problems, other problems and assess need for additional public outreach activities. e. Report of all education and community outreach efforts conducted during the quarter. f. Overall assessment of performance during the quarter. g. Recommendations to increase tonnage of Franchised Recyclable materials recovered. 2. Annual Report - On or before July 31 of each year of the term of this ordinance, Grantee shall submit a fiscal year-end annual report to include, but not be limited to, the following: a. A collated summary of the information contained in the quarterly reports and a summary of the average overall Program participation rates and tonnages of recovered Franchised Recyclables. lit .2. t?' .2.0 b. Discussion of problems and noteworthy experiences in the Program operation, measures taken to resolve problems, increase efficiency and Program participation. Number of complaints listed by type of complaint, i.e., missed pick-up, quality of service, etc., that occurred during the year. c. Report of all education and community outreach efforts conducted during the year and a discussion of their general impact on participation and recovered tonnages. d. Overall assessment of performance during the year. e. Recommendations to increase tonnage of recyclable materials recovered. f. Additional information as necessary to meet State and/or Federal mandated reporting requirements. F. Performance Standards - This ordinance for Residential Multi- family Recycling services is subject to the performance standards and franchise conditions detailed in Section 14 Forfeiture of the franchise (ordinance No. 1993). While it is the intent of Section 22 to describe specific Multi-family Recycling collection services to be provided by the Grantee in addition to existing refuse collection and disposal services, Grantee agrees that unacceptable performance of recycling services will be considered severable from its other obligations under the Franchise. Every reasonable effort must be made by the Grantee to maintain high levels of participation in order to reach the City's established diversion goals and assist in meeting the diversion standards set out in Assembly Bill 939 and the City and County's Mandatory Recycling Ordinances. G. Additional Franchise Fee - The Grantee, as part of the consideration of this ordinance, agrees to pay to the City an additional franchise fee at a rate consistent with that paid for refuse collection and detailed in Section 4 Consideration of the Franchise, as amended by Ordinance 2104. This rate will begin at eight percent (8%) of the annual Gross Receipts collected by said Grantee within the City of Chula Vista from residents for the Multi-family Recycling Program within the City. and increase bv one-half (1/2) oercent in accordance with the refuse and sinale- familv recvclina franchise fee increases. However. said franchise fee increase must be aDo roved bv Citv Council. BClliAAiAll April 1, 1991, tAe fraAeAise fee shall be inercased by OAe Aalf 1gerccnt I-S" ~'.2/ (1/2%) ane one half percent (1/2%) each April thereafter uAtil it reaeAes a ffiaxiffil:lffi af ten pereent. It is understood that any such increase in the franchise fee by the City shall be cause for the Grantee to increase charges in order to "pass through" the cost of the franchise fee. H. Term - it is the intent of the City that the term for the provision of Residential Multi-family Recycling Services shall be to the year 2002, subject to a two year notice of cancellation by the City without cause which cannot be tendered sooner than the end of the third year. The services remain cancelable for cause at any time. SECTION 3: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption. Presented by Bruce M. Boogaar City Attorney mbyQ -e,' MA-- , Athena Lee Bradley Conservation Coordinator /Co .,,21)";l.J.. OJ - c (J) E ..c o rn ~ <l: >- W ii; ::::l l/) W I- ~ C .0 0.. a ~ "'C ell c: ~ (J) 0.. rn 0.. "'C Q) .~ 0 E en v - (J) LO a - rn co 0.. ~ <I} :J (J) a , en - ..>:: .2 Q) g Q) en 0.. ~ ell rn c Q) "'C ~ ~ Q) "'C 0 .E !:' c: Q) Q) rn "'C a !:' ..c :J - -' -' -' -' 0 -' 0 "'C ell Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) .5 Q) ..c >- >- >- >- >- en 0 rn .!!1 a rn "'C "'C "'C "'C en "'C 0.. Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) a en ..c ..c ..c ..c ..c - ~ (J) .!!1 .!!1 .!!1 .!!1 ~ .!!1 ell 0.. "'C ~ :J .0 .0 .0 .0 Q) .0 >- Q) U ell ell rn rn .!!1 rn l/) - - - - - - rn .5 en en en en ..c en W E ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 Q) I- J!! Q) (J) Q) Q) Q) Q) c: Q) 0 en ~ rn , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Z :;::; :J - - :J Q) LL. a a a a a a :2: a::: :2: z z z z z Z "'C Q) C> en Z a E E E E E E 0.. ::::i a rn rn rn rn rn rn () Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0.. Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl >- "'C a a a a a a I ~ C'"l () 0 co ~ C'"l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 co 0.. co - 0.. - 0.. 0.. - 0.. - 0.. V - W LO It:! ..Q ..Q .~ a a a::: "" ~ a ~ a a a a a ~ 0 ~ .... <I} c: <I} 0.. c: 0.. C C 0.. C 0.. c: <I} 0.. ~ Lu co LO l/) , 0 C'"l 0) ~ LO C'"l LO co C'"l LO 0 0) 0 ~ 0 C'"l C'"l ::::l C'"l C'"l co co N C'"l 0) ~ t-- 0) ~ ~ t-- t-- co C'"l C'"l LL. co N C'"l co C'"l 0) C'"l V C'"l 0) 0 C'"l C'"l V C'"l N co W t-- co co t-- co co co LO co co t-- co co co v co co a::: <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} <I} ..c 0 Q) ..c ell > ~ en 0 rn (J) a a ell - a OJ ~ 0 Q) Q)' a en C) "'C 0 OJ ~ "'C "'C :> c: en :g rn ~ ~ rn Cii Cii 'w rn rn rn rn a "'C en Q) rn "" c: c: >- :2: () .0 c: .!!l :2: '(if c: c: 'C "Q) a c: rn Q) c: en a a (J) :2: a rn - rn -;:: ~ :J Q) 0 'u 0 0.. E :;::; Q) :: c: c: ell - ell a ..c c: en E ell Q) rn 0 a rn rn a en 0 0 0 0 w w w - ....I ....I Z 0 0- en en en :> C> Z ...J () >- () w a::: Q. :J , -'" 0 '5. ~ Q) Q. "C c: Cll c: .0 ~ Q) Q. Cll c: 0 "C Q) Cl ~ Cll ..c " Q) ~ Cll "C c: Cll III Q) .... Cll ~ Q) III :J - Q) ~ Cll " ~ Q) E E 0 " III Cll Q) E Cll III Q) ..c .... Q) ~ Cll III Q) .... Cll ~ Q) III :J - Q) ~ > E Cll - , '';:; :J :2: III III Cll .c .).CJ ".2 'J ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item ",< J Meeting Date 7/1 3/93 PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-39; request to establish short-term transitional housing for homeless families up to 44 people at 31 Fourth Avenue - South Bay Community Services RESOLUTION /7/ /.5" Approving Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-39, a request to establish a short-term, transitional housing project at 31 Fourth Avenue in the R-3 Zoning District Director of Planning /?f~ /{h City Manager J}1o (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolLl South Bay Community Services is proposing to establish a short term transitional housing project for homeless families for a maximum of 43 tenants in family groups and one resident manager at an existing apartment complex located at 31 Fourth Avenue. The complex consists of 12 one bedroom units and 2 two bedroom units. An Initial Study, IS-93-36, of potential environmental impacts of the project was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator. The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would be no significant environmental effects and recommends adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum issued on IS-93-36. On April 28, 1993, South Bay Community Services held a community meeting for area residents. The notes from that meeting are attached. RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving a Conditional Use Permit to establish short-term transitional housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On June 23, 1993 the Planning Commission voted 7-0 recommending that Council approve the proposed Conditional Use Permit. The Commission recommended a condition which would require annual review by the Zoning Administrator for at least a two year period; the review to be discontinued if no objections were received after two years. This condition has been added to the City Council resolution. On June 8, 1993 the Resource Conservation Commission voted 5-1-1 to recommend adoption of the Negative Declaration for IS-93-36. The RCC also voted to recommend an annual review of the project by a 6-0-1 vote. Several issues were also raised by the RCC. These are discussed in detail in Section C of this report. cI./-1 Page 2, Item ,)./ Meeting Date 7/13/93 DISCUSSION: 1. Zoning and Land Use: Zoninq Land Use Site R-3 Apartments North R-3/CCD Apartments South R-3 Apartments East R-3 Apartments West R-3 Eucalyptus Park General Plan Med-Hi (11-18 du/acl Med-Hi (11-18 du/acl/ Commercial Med-Hi (11-18 du/ac) Med-Hi (11-18 du/ac) Public/Quasi Public 2. Existing Site Characteristics: The 18,000 sq. ft. site currently contains an existing 9.412 sq. ft. multi-family residential structure consisting of 14 apartments. The site also contains 18 parking spaces along the eastern edge of the parcel. The building was originally constructed in 1972 and has been used as an apartment complex since that time. The current number of residents at this location is approximately 34. A landscaped courtyard is at the center of the complex with dwellings on either side to the north and south of the courtyard. Pedestrian access to the site is from Fourth Avenue, while vehicles access the 18 parking spaces to the rear via an access easement to the north. 3. Proposed Use/Project Characteristics: South Bay Community Services is proposing to provide transitional housing and off-site support services for homeless families. The longest length of stay will be 60 days. A maximum of 43 tenants will live in the apartments in their respective family units. A resident manager will also reside in one of the dwellings. It should be noted that the project will serve only homeless families, not the habitually homeless or homeless singles. It will serve families willing to work in order to re-establish themselves in the community as contributing members of society. A wide variety of support services will be available off-site to meet the residents varying needs including job training, job referral, youth entrepreneurship training, Head Start, child care, health care, individual and family counseling, domestic violence prevention and intervention, transportation, nutrition education, budgeting education, parenting skills, literacy training, homework assistance, mentors, Big Brothers/Big Sister, recreation and after-school programs. .2. / . r;t Page 3. Item ,).. / Meeting Date 7/13/93 The maximum number of people per unit will be as follows: 11 one bedrooms @ 3 persons/unit 2 two bedrooms @ 5 persons/unit 1 one bedroom @ 1 person lunit = 33 persons 10 persons 1 person (resident manager) = TOTAL 44 persons 4. Similar Establishments: Several other similar establishments exist throughout the County. North County Housing Foundation in Escondido operates a transitional housing project for families containing 18 beds. North County Interfaith Council, Escondido operates a 30 bed transitional and short term housing project. In Encinitas, Community Resource Center operates a transitional housing project with 25 beds. The Salvation Army also provides 50 beds for short term shelter for families in San Diego. The main concern, as discussed later in this report, in looking at these other projects is parking and the adequacy of the 18 parking spaces to handle the proposed number of tenants. 5. Issues Raised by the Resource Conservation Commission: As expressed earlier in this. report the RCC raised several issues of concern. These are: A. School impacts, specifically to teaching professionals and classrooms, in which there is the potential for children to be enrolling and leaving every 60 days due to the fact that residents within the project will have a maximum 60 day stay. Response: At the recommendation of the Chula Vista Elementary School District and with the concurrence of South Bay Community Services, a condition has been included which will require transport of all school aged children to their current school of attendance or a school determined by the District based upon space availability. B. The overall increase in the number of residents at the complex. The number should be capped at 44. Response: The CUP is capped at 44 people because the application lists this number. It would require an amendment to the CUP approved by the City Council for the number to increase above the approved number. rJ/" 3 Page 4. Item .).,1 Meeting Date 7/13/93 C. Economic impact on rents in the vicinity of the project. There is a perceived potential that the existence of this facility could cause the rents in other apartment complexes in the vicinity to drop as people would not want to rent in proximity to a transitional housing project for homeless families. Response: The attached executive summary of the 1988 document titled The Effects of Subsidized and Affordable Housing on Property Values: A Survey of Research compiled by the Department of Housing and Community Development, State of California, summarizes findings from 15 documents. It states: "This paper lists and summarizes a total of 15 published papers: 11 on the effects of subsidized housing on property values, one on the effects of group homes for the handicapped, and three on the effects of manufactured housing. . . .Four of these publications address situations in California. Of these 15 publications, 14 reached the conclusion that there are no significant negative effects from locating subsidized, special- purpose or manufactured housing near market-rate developments. Some, in fact, reported positive property value effects after locating subsidized units in the neighborhood". No evidence has been supplied that this project will cause property values to drop. To the contrary, studies such as cited above, while not focused on this specific type of project, have indicated that values generally remain unchanged when subsidized housing projects are located within a neighborhood. D. The potential for concentration of this type of use in the vicinity. Response: Given the information on property values coupled with the fact that the general vicinity is not in a state of decline, it is staff's conclusion that even given other institutions in the area providing various types of public services, the area will not decline. Also, South Bay Community Services is finalizing a set of house rules which will apply to all residents (see attached). These rules are much stricter than those usually applied to residents of typical apartment complexes and are more easily enforced because there is not a lease agreement or other contract, as between a tenant in an apartment complex and the owner, that would preclude quick eviction. If a resident of the facility breaks the rules, he or she can be immediately released from the program and removed from the premises. ,2/~ ,,/ Page 5, Item .). / Meeting Date 7/13/93 ANALYSIS General Plan Conformance: The project is in conformance with and implements the Chula Vista General Plan. Specifically, Goal 3, Objectives 10 and 12 of the Land Use Element are implemented by the project. These state: GOAL 3. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY CHARACTER Traditionally, Chula Vista has been characterized by single family, detached residences and neighborhood-serving uses. It is the goal of the city to accommodate a full diversity of housing types, while maintaining an orientation to detached single-family living. Objective 10. Encourage the development of a diversity of housing types and prices. Implementation: The project will provide housing units for homeless families at minimal cost to them. Objective 12. Provide for the development of multiple-family housing in appropriate areas convenient to public services, facilities and circulation. Implementation: The project will make housing available to homeless families in an area that provides the necessary public conveniences (shopping, parks, public transportation, etc.). It is, in fact, very important that these conveniences be available to the prospective residents because of their lack of mobility. In addition to the above, the project also conforms with and implements goals and objectives of the Housing Element. General Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 of Section 2.2 of this element are implemented by the project. These state: 2.2 GENERAL OBJECTIVES The following goals jointly constitute the overall aim of the Housing Element of the City of Chula Vista. 1. The overall increase of the housing stock of the planning area; Chula Vista provides its fair share of regional housing needs. Implementation: This project will provide housing for homeless families, which will be part of Chula Vista's fair share of regional housing needs. 2. The provision of adequate housing for the elderly, handicapped, large families and persons and families of low or moderate income, and the homeless. ..1/..5' Page 6, Item ,,) I Meeting Date 7/13/93 Imolementation: As stated, subject project will provide adequate housing for transitional homeless families. 3. The broadening of local residents' choice of housing, housing types, and living environments. Imolementation: By making a transitional housing facility located at 31 Fourth Avenue available to homeless families, their choice of housing types is broadened and they will be in a better position to re-establish themselves economically. In addition, preference will be given to Chula Vista citizens. 4. The protection of the quality-of-life of existing settlements within the planning area. Imolementation: The subject project will not deteriorate the quality-of- life of surrounding residents because of the rules. Among other rules, persons residing in this facility will not be allowed to have alcoholic beverages on-site. This will decrease the potential for drunkenness and the deterioration of the quality-of-life resulting from such over consumption. This rule is not applied to neighboring apartment complexes. 6. The integration of low and moderate income housing into the existing middle-class residential neighborhoods of the planning area, and the preclusion of the establishment of "ghettoes" or low-income enclaves. Besides Objective 6, this project also implements the related Section 2.3 Housing Policy, Item 9, which states: Low and moderate income households are entitled to the same residential and environmental amenities as those which are standard to other families. Scaled down amenities and qualities build slums, and therefore must be carefully avoided. Imolementation: This area is generally considered middle-class, and the introduction of homeless families will implement these Objective 6 and Item 9. Zoninq Ordinance Conformance: The subject use is quasi-public. As such, a conditional use permit is required per Chapter 19.54. Public/quasi-public uses are permitted in any zone with a CUP. Land Use Comoatibilitv: Given the nature of the proposed land use, the existing surrounding residential uses and the proximity to services and amenities, the land use is considered to be compatible with the neighborhood. .21"'~ Page 7, Item e:J./ Meeting Date 7/13/93 Parkinq: This project initially raised concern among staff because of the slight increase in the number of inhabitants in the complex in regards to parking. At present, 19 spaces exist, but one will be lost in order to provide a handicapped space. An example of the parking ratios for the projects mentioned in Section C.4 of this report are as follows: Orqanization/Citv No. of Beds No. of Parking Spaces Average Spaces/Bed North County Housing Foundation, Escondido 18 6 0.33:1 North County Inter- Faith Council, Escondido 30 10 0.33:1 Community Resource Center, Encinitas 25 ~ 0.24:1 Totals 73 22 0.30:1 South Bay Community Services, Chula Vista 44 18 0.41: 1 Compared to these similar projects, the proposal appears to have more than adequate parking. When broken down by parking spaces per unit, the ratio for the proposed project is 1.29 spaces per unit (18/14 = 1.29). Based on this information and contact with the facilities and City staff from Escondido and Encinitas, staff has concluded that the proposed parking ratio should be more than adequate to meet the needs of the homeless families who will reside at the facility. (See attached for a parking survey of homeless facilities.) Access/Traffic/Circulation: Access to the site is by way of an easement from Offerman Lane to the north of the project parcel. Based on the survey of other similar uses noted above, and the Negative Declaration for IS-93-36, there should be no increase in traffic generation. The City's Engineering Department calculated that traffic on Fourth Avenue would remain at 17,580 ADT (average daily trips) and that Fourth Avenue in the vicinity of the project will remain at a level-of-service (LOS) "C" or better. Given the statements from the directors of other similar projects, the actual traffic figures should decrease slightly because there will be fewer vehicles. This is based on statements that indicate that homeless families generally tend to have fewer cars than permanently domiciled families. No changes to the circulation pattern are anticipated, especially since emergency vehicles have adequate turnaround space. .:21- ? Page 8, Item .).1 Meeting Date 7/13/93 Visual/Aesthetics/Architectural Treatment: The applicant does not plan to change the established architectural style of the complex. Plav Areas: The proximity of Eucalyptus Park across Fourth Avenue, in addition to the other off-site activities in which the children will be involved, will fill the time of the children who temporarily reside here. If the children chose to play in the parking area to the rear of the complex, it should be kept in mind that children have been doing this since 1972 when the complex was first constructed. To place restrictions on the children to keep them from this area as has been suggested by one of the opponents to the project would in our opinion be inappropriate, especially since children in neighboring apartment complexes would not have the same restriction placed on them by virtue of their residing in a typical apartment. Trash Service: A trash enclosure exists on the parcel immediately to the north of the site at 17 Fourth Avenue at its southeast corner. This neighboring parcel is owned by South Bay Community Services. The existing trash enclosure has been in place for several years and has proven to meet the needs of the residents of both of these complexes. In the event, however, that the existing bin is not adequate to meet the demand, the frequency of pickup can be increased to ensure a health problem is not created. Public Safetv: In a memo dated May 14, 1993, Mary Jane Diosdado of the Crime Prevention Unit of the Chula Vista Police Department made several recommendations to increase the security of the project which have been included as conditions of approval. CONCLUSION Based on the factors noted above, we are therefore recommending approval of the proposal in accordance with the City Council Resolution. FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable. Attachments: ~ Resolution J Locator and Site Plan J Negative Declaration/Initial Study Planning Commission Minutes and Resolution (6/23/93) RCC Minutes (617/93) Public Forum Summary (4/28/93) Letters/Petitions From Interested Parties Staff Correspondence to Regina Hickey. Hart Klein and Attorney Paul Robinson Executive Summary of Article on Effects of Affordable Housing on Property Values Proposed SBCS House Rules Parking Survey of Homeless Projects SBCS Information on their Casa Nuestra Facility at 1515 Hilltop Drive Disclosure Statement I u. ~ ~ (f:\home\planning\martin\sbaycomm\9339a.113) .2/,y " , . . \.,J ,~ '3 s RESOLUTION NO. /7/&..5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-39, A REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A SHORT-TERM, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROJECT FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES AT 31 FOURTH AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on April 28, 1993 by South Bay Community Services ("Applicant"); and WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC- 93-39) to establish a short-term, transitional housing project for homeless families for a maximum of 43 residents and one resident manager in the R-3 Zoning District ("Project") at 31 Fourth Avenue ("Project Site"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on June 23, 1993 and voted 7-0-0 recommending that the City Council approve subject Project; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m. July 13, 1993 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration and Addendum issued on IS-93-36. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find: 1 . That the project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration and Addendum issued on 15-93-36. The City Council hereby finds that the Project will have no significant environmental impacts in that the Project does not have: ;21"'7 Resolution No. Page #2 A. The potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. B. The potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long term, environmental goals. C. Impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. D. Effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The following findings are required pursuant to Section 19.14.080 of the Municipal Code: 2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. The conditional approval of PCC-93-39 at the proposed location is necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which will contribute to the general well being of the community in that there is an existing, apartment complex in place, and the service to be provided by South Bay Community Services will contribute to the community by providing short-term, transitional housing for homeless families in the South Bay area. 3. That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. The conditional approval of PCC-93-39 will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the project vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the project vicinity in that the project is residential in nature and will not negatively impact parking, circulation, services or residences in the project's vicinity. r:ll., )C/ Resolution No. Page #3 4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in this code for such use. The conditional approval of PCC-93-39 complies with the regulations and conditions of the Municipal Code in that the project is conditioned to comply with the requirements of all applicable City departments, will not generate excessive traffic, and provides adequate off-street parking in accordance wit the Planning Commission determination, pursuant to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Section 19.54.050. The Planning Commission further finds that this is a quasi-public use and not enumerated in Section 19.62, and, therefore, based on staff analysis, 18 parking spaces is an appropriate amount of parking for this use. 5. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government agency. The conditional approval of PCC-93-39 will not adversely affect the General Plan of the City of Chula Vista in that quasi-public uses are unclassified, which are allowed in any zoning district upon approval of a conditional use permit. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants conditional use permit PCC-93-39 subject to the following conditions whereby the applicant shall: 1. Comply with and implement all requirements of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and applicable Fire Department and Building Department requirements, as appropriate. 2. Prior to occupancy, submit the rules for residency to the Director of Planning for review and approval, and maintain compliance throughout occupancy. 3. Perform a study of and implement a solution to the potential courtyard drainage problem, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 4. Transport all school aged children to their current school of attendance. In the event a child must attend a school within the Chula Vista Elementary School District, said child shall attend the school determined by the District, based on space availability. .2/"// Resolution No. Page #4 5. Implement the suggestions of the Chula Vista Police Department security survey dated May 14, 1993, in order to enhance the security of the facility. 6. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified or deleted conditions imposed after approval of this permit to advance a legitimate governmental interest related to health, safety or welfare which the City shall impose after advance written notice to the Permittee and after the City has given to the Permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee can not, in the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected to economically recover. 7. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City for additional conditions or revocation. 8. This conditional use permit shall be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator at the end of the first and second years of operation following occupancy. Notice of the review shall be given to all property owners within 1,000 feet plus any residents who submitted letters or spoke at the public hearing. The Zoning Administrator may refer the permit to the Planning Commission for public hearing, if the Zoning Administrator determines there are reasonable grounds to revoke, modify existing conditions, or add additional conditions. Following the two year period, the permit will no longer be subject to this special annual review requirement, but only normal City monitoring. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applic Presented by ,d .. t" Robert A. Leiter Director of Planning Bruce M. Boogaar City Attorney (f:\home\planning\martin\sbaycomm\9339cc.resl 02/"' /~) ~ / - /9 0) Apr. 27, 1993 John Shepard 846 La Senda Way Chula Vista, Ca. 91910 .,._~ ~._.. Tim Nader and Council members City of Chula Vista 276 4 th Ave. Chula Vista, CA. 91910, Dear Mayor and council, 1''', , I , l" l;"\. "U;L.: ~. L, Cl'}..I~;;'"~ ~.,'",_.. ...; Recently r became interested in the renovation of the property at 31 4th ave. by sath Bay Community services. r understand that a permit will have to be approved by the city council before this can take place. r strongly recommend that approval for this project will be forthcoming from the city council. For the past year r have been involved in "Wings Transitional housing" sponsered by the interfaith shelter net work. This housing along with interfaith transitional housing does not appear to have a negative effect on the surrounding area. The reason seems to be that all candidates are very well screened and must abide by strict rules or they are out of the program. Today I questioned a friend of mine about what he thought about the effect might be on the surrounding area. He felt that it might be negative,since people pushing shopping carts around,such as the home less do in San Deego,would be in evidence. r think the above is a picture many people have of the homeless and is responsible for resistence to their coming into an area to live. r doubt that the people selected to live a 31 4th Ave,if the permit passes,would appear much different from the people all ready living in the surrounding appartments. There can be no doubt about the need for transitional housing for the homeless in the South Bay. I hope that you will consider my reasons for saying that there will be no negative impact should a permit be issued for the above renovation to provide tansitional housing. Please grant this permit. Sincerely, 5/5/93 CITY CLERK -- PLEASE INCLUDE WHEN THIS ITEM IS DOCKETED FOR COUNCIL PER MAYOR. John Shepard crY>l ,~~ (")(") ~ ~=i -<-< :u 00 ~ fT1 ,-"T1 (") qjc> -- :r: I fT1 ~c::. Ul < (/), 01:> -0 fTl -n-.::~ U1 0 ::!JC 0-- 0 c1/-/3 m;t- w 0- r?2 ,~) "';;..- O' , " " ,,- . ~ ( I , t ru .. ,...~ , " f\) .... W 0(- d' '<!J ~ $"'<s,~} 'Ie 5..r ~ i~'~ ~ ~"'~~ ' / d -<.,JZ,,& C() /993 ~ V~ ~ C~-J;- _ ~~ ~J .~..~ /yn..c.vJ- ,t.. X~A ;=~r/l.J a-.JL ~_ ~"nL.-J ....t~ ~ ~M<--V (~t /CL/ ~~ ?>v ~yu&~f~~;-z/ ? T1u-. t9-?U/~1J ;c~~ -feu 31 F<9-<-~ G4<.l""-<.<--v, '1)""" x ~&-'fI-e,,-"..J ~\ ~J'-c~~Z/:L~ 4- >- 1 U .,;.. ~. ~~"-' ..t...r /(fIkA-, 0- r-U---V <~"\ . ~ O~ -~'<. ~~ /lA-d' ~.&..~ 3 f P/:!-U.~ cLv",.~ ~.d EA.u p~v ~.v .0..v .i~ <J..i,-,<-f~ ).u_'-<-- .d".> /JA.kf ix~ a~.c<<",,-..iPz/ ..b~t1~-...,j-- c<.r<-~ a~~~U'~ 6r; &"1'v'u~ age '1~ v.)1H.A.J2.Q ~ ~-R fe'v il:;.~ ~ ~ ~ C!.(:-~t4. ~--k'4=-" / _/--L~L" ~ ..I-<.'~ /;n.{.:{ r~...u-J2er~'''''''''''- 01- ~()ft~. .' ~ ,^,C'0 ~~IA~ ,u<<~ "-r;,-I!~~ ...L..-v JJIJIO )S,~~l&~~\i, v' () u . . ;tt.Jtl(pta)l~nkl1:J ~ ~,~ ,&.J!x ~ /Cr..it-u- M~~W6-~~/~h-<-~Q . a3^1303~ ~~~/UJJtj.', -, /;t:~ ).11...J7 t~j tr kj'tW'i G 3'10".:b 0tu.x..:t ~f,._ V.t....c.... <!A q'{J Ie j./- /.5 ~ "# PLL- '(3.3Q RECEIVED h 9) /993 rr '93 .u. -9 P 3 :06 em r!kPv V~ (!;h; IT~OF~J ~ ~ ~~ TYf.::r~. V';;:od h {.z-~ ~ -- . f~hv(k'~ ~~''/ ~/.$~~ ~ J: ~:l~ J;1:;;~'!2~ ~. '. ~~~M.~ ~'" ~~t~ [_ 'lIhr ~ &uu ~ ~ ~..kww ~ ~ wU . (,0 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i tt4' ~~~)~Ju.~ Jrv~~~.hd C;~. AlA ~~ ~ tuu~, -,)~ ~ ~ ~,3) Ii.. ~r ~~J~)P.J~ ~~J6)AJ~~~;2~(~~ JM;/~~)J~ IIL~~ ~ ~, ~~~~ I~-~ + ~ ~ ~ tt ~', (]k,~ ~ ~v tVl#.t3j ((VfJf If) M~ f3~ tArJ) ~ ~ oAf 4 0h1I ElM f3 'j (ffno/Jgb In Mj &.r.,k '1o.('rJ.)! ;?/4Jt~L-.ArAL ~ ..& ~ J4 ;,a., 35' ...f4..,1 ~ eJ)-/? 333 /)..Jl;~~ r"": .. ~ r'. :=; ~ 01:' Q-~.t (i! T' , r I.w" ~ 1m ~21 LOCATOR AND SITE PLAN .)/~/'l f B B ~--,...- -,-- - - .,.,.~...... I, L_~ I r----------- I I I I I , , I , -i I I r I rur--" " , d I I II I I " I I : ~ a:: o Z STREET .~ F>~~/::;.~..<-: ::: .', - .. '.I ", ',,'~:" d. ", , '.: .' : .1"', . .' ...l,..; ... . j . _. r"_. ;'(":. :~ .'~.'" 'eueAL TYPTUS PARK' (;i'....;?:;:.~<~<~\{:: ::, ( .' t,' _ .J,J.~', ~ -: ',:1,-: " . 110,/' ',,' . I ". ,I ~ ., :., 1 '-l ~ - .. ... III ;; ... ... z i STREET > > , f- ~- , t ! ... 'EH' cr o !t :r -r -I.... ~ :::J t=ID ~ ! : r--1~1 %u a:: :::l o ~ .L ", -- - 1 Q '" i ... % ~ a:: o z PROJECT LOCATION % ... .. i ~ L-; '...........--:<:...... W ..J ~ <l W '" Jj f ~ ~ u ~IMBA..L cr w ... t ...J Cl t' I __.J r t- ---t CIIULA V I ST A PL.-\'i!\'ING DEPARTMENT C) APPLICANT: SOUTII BA Y CO~I~Il'~rn PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SERVICES Shol'l IeI'm housing (up to 60 days) for homeless ADDRESS JI FOllnll A\'l:\I'E families for up to 50 people (Public/Quasi use. SCALE' FILE NUMBER Requires Cily Council approval) NORTH 1" = 400' PCC -93 - 39 d / --- ;{tJ --1- \ ~"') 2l - -'~ -'~ ~ .W < . < . ~~ -I- -I- - 10 ~L.: ~g ~ l5 -- 5l' 0 ~~O ~ ~ 15 a:: . Vl~ - - en en VlO Vll5 >- (J) ~ +' ~!:! !:! .~ ~~ ~I') a:: .;,: Z .en ~~en .,. < W ~~~ _CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ I- ~O ",a.. -' "i~~ >- >- < CDI-I') < ~ .. -' a:: .. -' a:: ~ 0 -~ . --0-:::1 !z <. ~i~ ~i~ ..J . Z I- -' ~~~ ~..: I- 0 1-<< a..Vl 15< < < < -< -< - ~Vl I-. < I- a.. 0 tJ ~I- 15~t: 151-.1- ~ -I-. D.. .,. ...J l5~~ ~1515~~ ~ - Vl 1- g' <~ II VlI ~~~> NI-!j NI-~ ~~ I~i . <( -'~> +'tJ> . 0 15 -~ ~ ~ ~~g ~~8lX< m~ f~~g ~;~ I;" iilN ~8 W ~ -'~N"'g - ....- i ~~ ~ .... W I- . ~15 ~:; -' < ...... ~~ Vll') ~~ ~~ W c."Z.- -a:: Vll-. - < (!) W x x - UJ&l -' < W W Vl ~::J -, ,01r ,01r tJ< . ~:', ,l:~ ,l:~ ,8 UJ W () ~ - > ~- ~ ~ mi a: - a:: .- 1-< ~ < W '(,,_ o;!~ -. UJ ....- ~- ~~~ .~ ' Vl- <~ > ~- ~ x a:: lj~x (#l WI- < t- !h W I - Z 8~ ,y~ ::::> en en I~ ~ ~ ,OOl: ~CIOOItl'X3 ~ ~ < ',:t a:: 0 ~I I- ~~ ~:::>milS .., ~ W ~ II () :IN IlS I X3 '. ~ ~~ ' - > ~~ ~ ~:':' <( ,... > -....- I') x~ I- ';;' ~ .~ a> -' 8~ ~ < ll<:-' ': X - w- ~~ ,:,' W (/)!! ID < '. .' is .~ ~ " .. ~~ ~ :c ~- .... rli x 02 . t- tJ- lii.; Iii W < ::::> '1- ~. .~ F lj~ ':",':. -.- 0 " , (/):1 ',. ~ UJ .' , , ~~i :'.~' !.. (31V^I~d) 3NVl NV~~~~O ;J, ) J..2 / /!! :,:: J(J . " 'hie . .... ~. ....~ NEGATIVE DECLARATION/INITIAL STUDY :2/-~J.. mitigated negallve declaration PROJECT NAME: South Bay Community Services - Sixty Day Shon- Term Housing for the Homeless PROJECT LOCATION: 31 Founh Avenue ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 566-010-10 PROJECT APPLICANT: South Bay Community Services, Inc. CASE NO: IS-93-36 DATE: May 17, 1993 A. Project Setting The project setting consists of an existing 14 unit, two-story 9,412 sq. ft. apartment building on an 18,000 sq. ft. parcel located at 31 Founh Avenue. The founeen apartment unit building, conscructed in 1972 consists of 2 two-bedroom units and 12 one- bedroom units. The current number of residents at this building is approximately 34 people. The units center around a landscaped counyard. The pedestrian entrance to the complex is on Founh Avenue and the parking area is in the rear of the complex - accessed from Founh Avenue via Offerman Lane - a private road, and through a vehicular access on the propeny located at 17 Founh A venue. Through a review of the Title Repon, and funher discussion with staff at the title company, staff determined that the above sited easements are legal easements. Eighteen parking spaces are provided for this building. The adjoining land uses are: multi-family apartments to the south and east, Eucalyptus Park across Founh A venue to the west and multi-family residential and retail commercial to the nonh. B. Project Description The proposed project is the conditional use of an existing multi-family apartment building for families in need of transitional housing. A maximum stay of 60 days is allowed. No exterior physical alterations are anticipated. Only minor interior alterations are anticipated. The applicant's original proposal was to provide housing for up to a maximum of 50 persons. This objective was to be achieved by the removing kitchens and dining rooms in 12 of the 14 units and turning the "dining-room and kitchen areas" of each unit into an additional bedroom. One of the remaining one-bedroom units was to be converted into a community kitchen and dining facility and the other one bedroom unit was to provide living quarters for the on-site propeny manager. JJ-~J elt)' of c:IIul. wilt. plIInnlng ...,.rtment environment.. review Mellon ~(ft.. ~ -~- "':{~~ cmOF . OiULA VISTA - 3~ Page 2 In response to the Notice of Initial Study of the above cited proposal, five comment letters and four phone calls were received from surrounding residents. In addition, one property owner met with staff to voice his concerns. Some of the concerns raised by residents included an increase in density (50 people in the building instead of 34), noise, traffic, parking, public health and safety, and concerns about the potential impacts of delivery trucks bringing food and services for the congregate kitchen. As a result of reviewing the comments from residents as well as the comments from various City departments and discussions with City staff, South Bay Community Services has modified their project description. Instead of removing the kitchens from the 14 units, the kitchens will be left in place. There will no longer be a congregate kitchen or the provision of congregate meals. This amended project description is in compliance with fmdings of the Court under Section 15070 of the California Environmental Quality Act that . Any needed or proposed mitigation measures must be incorporated into a proposed negative declaration and the project revised accordingly before the negative declaration is released for public review. " (Sunstrom v. Mendocino - 1988) As a result of leaving the kitchens in place, South Bay Community Services expects to have a maximum capacity for 43 tenants plus the property manager. This has been calculated as follows: 11 one-bedroom units with up to 3 persons per unit and 2 two- bedroom units with up to 5 persons per unit. One additional one-bedroom unit will be occupied by the manager. The reduced number of residents and the fact that the units will remain self-contained will reduce potential impacts of increased density and potential impacts from delivery trucks servicing the complex. , Parking requirements for multi-family residential units in the public-quasi public zone are for 1.5 spaces for one bedroom units and 2 spaces for two bedroom units. The project has 18 parking spaces including one handicapped space. Therefore, if this was a new apartment complex being developed within the City of Chula Vista, the parking requirement would be 22 spaces. However, as the proposed project is a public - quasi-public use in the Zoning Ordinance for short-term housing for homeless families, the fmal determination of the number of parking units that are required will be made by the Planning Commission in response to staff recommendation. Staff recommendation, based on the .Parking Use Survey. attached to the Initial Study done on other similar uses, is 1 parking space per 3 residents. This low ratio of the number of parking spaces needed per resident is due to the fact that few residents have cars. A parking survey that was conducted of 11 other similar facilities within San Diego County by South Bay Community Services concluded that the average number of on-site parking spaces per bed was 0.16. Comments from contact persons included, .On the average, one third of the residents have cars.. (pacific Beach Safe Harbor); .We have no parking because few homeless have cars.. (YWCA-Women in Transition San Diego). d. J ,..)., 1 - 4,. Page 3 Title to the land and apartment building and the access easements is currently vested in Park Vista Apartments and South Bay Community Services is in escrow for purchase of the property. South Bay "Community Services" (SBCS) is a community-based nonprofit organization serving the South San Diego Bay. SBCS began in 1971 as a treatment rehabilitation center for drug abusing teens. Over the years, other youth and family support programs that have been initiated by SBCS including: juvenile diversion, alternate schooling, counseling, job training, literacy/tutoring, AIDS prevention education and affordable housing assistance. SBCS also runs Casa Nuestra, currently the only homeless housing in the South Bay region, providing beds and 24 hour services for runaway and homeless teens. This project, transitional living for 13 families not to exceed 43 tenants, is for Chula Vista and National City homeless families. The city of residence will be determined by school records or other proof of last permanent residence. Families will be referred from local organizations which currently work with the homeless including schools, police, private nonprofit organizations and religious institutions. Families with any drug abuse, alcohol or mental illness problems, single adults, criminals or people who are not able to abide by strict rules, regulations, and a program designed to help them become self-sufficient will not be accepted. Families will not be able to enter the project without a referral from an established agency. No family will be permitted to "walk-up" to 31 Fourth Avenue and move in to the project. The sign currently posted in the front lawn will be removed. There will be no sign pronouncing that the building provides short- term housing for homeless families. This housing facility will not serve the habitually homeless. SBCS is coordinating a team of private, local service providers for this facility including: Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee (MAAC) Project, Lutheran Social Services and Episcopal Community Services. All of these services will provide a wide range of . services geared at helping families achieve self-sufficiency. The services include: job- training and referral, child care, case management, health care, permanent housing referral, budgeting, independent living skills, literacy training, psychological counseling and transportation. The only on-site activity will be property management. All other activities, such as child care, education and recreation, will be off-site. A large percentage of the children will be group transponcd to their off-site activities. (please see attached A l'vDical Dav For a Familv Livin!! in South Bav Community Services Short-Term Housin!! at 31 Fourth A venue for an in-depth description of who works with the tenants and what happens on a typical day. On-site property management will be provided by an experienced property management firm with wide experience managing units for the homeless and lower income families. The SBCS Development Director, who reports to the Executive Director, will be responsible for asset management, including liaison with the property management firm, landscaping company, utility providers and other contractors. The Development Director will supervise a Program Director with specific responsibilities ;2/ /c2S - s-- Page 4 regarding the property including maintenance, day-to-day operations and work with the on-site manager. If the project is approved tenants currently residing in the building will receive relocation assistance under the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970. This policy includes any family or individual that must move as a direct result of rehabilitation, demolition or acquisition. This assistance may include: advisory services, payment for moving expenses, and replacement housing assistance. The discretionary action on this application is a Conditional Use Permit. C. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans The General Plan Designation for the site is Medium High Density Residential (11-18 dwelling units per acre) and the zoning is R-3-Apartment Residential Zone. Conditional Use Permits are required for public-quasi public uses. The proposed use is permitted with a Conditional Use Permit under the definition of public-quasi public (19.04.190 in the Zoning Ordinance) as an unclassified use. (Chapter 19.54 of the Zoning Ordinance authorizes unclassified uses.) As the proposal is for a public-quasi public use a conditional use permit is required. D. Identification of Environmental Effects Desilmated The Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (attached as Environmental Checklist form) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Repon will not be required. A Negative Declaration has been prepared. F. Miti2ation Necessary to Avoid Si~nificant Environmental ImDacts A specific mitigation measure regarding a potential surface drainage problem has been identified. The mitigation measure required to reduce the potentially significant impact to a level of less than significant is that a monitor fin~""ed by the applicant field check the existing on-site drainage and that the applicant correct any problem. This mitigation measure is made a condition of project approval, as well as a requirement of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program (Addendum "A"). G. Mandatory Findinl!s of Sil!nificance Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact repon needs to be prepared. While the City is not required to prepare a negative declaration where a categorical exemption is appropriate (Guidelines 15301), as is the case here, the City recognizes that transitional housing is often controversial and that a negative declaration provides the 2)-;26 --(p- Page 5 public with an opportunity to comment on the project and to better refme mitigation measures. 1. The project bas the potential to substantiaJ]y degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a rlSh or wildlife species, cause a fISh or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or IInim..1 community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or IInim..l, or ..Iiminate important examples of the mlijor periods of California history or prehistory. The proposed project consists of the renovation of an existing multi-family apartment building within an urbanized area of the City. There are no known significant biological or historical or prehistorical resources on the site. 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. One of the City's Long Tenn Environmental Goals (found in the Housing Element of the General Plan) is to recognize that homelessness is a regional problem and that the provision of transitional housing in the South Bay is a means of addressing that problem. The approval of this facility is in accordance with the City's General Plan and would be a meaningful step towards achieving the short-tenn goal of the provision of housing to assist the homeless and would also be a step toward the long-tenn City goal of answering the 'homeless problem. 3. The project has possible effects which are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. This project does not have the potential to be individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study considered potential cumulative impacts. It was determined that there was a very minor cumulative improvement to traffic and air pollution due to the expected project-related reduction in traffic. 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Substantial adverse effects on human beings usually result from hazardous materials, noise, safety hazards, etc. One existing potential safety impact was cited, due to potentially inadequate existing drainage. Mitigation is possible to remedy this existing impact and thus reduce it to a level below significant. Thus, no substantial adverse effects on human beings ~ither directly or indirectly are expected. ;2/~:Z 7 - '7- Page 6 H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Orl!ani7ations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John Lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Garry Williams, Planning Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing Carol Gove, Fire Marshal Barbara Brookover, Senior Crime Analyst Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept. Barbara Reid, Planning Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney Diana Richardson, Community Development David Harris, Community Development Martin Miller, Planning Capt. Rod Hawkins, Fire Department Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: Robert, Bein & Frost/Shoulders and Sanford 2. Documents General Plan, City of Chula Vista Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Corporation Grant Deed for APN-566-010-1O and 566-010-15 for Park Vista Apartments Telephone Conversation with Hans Giroux, Acoustician, May 27, 1993 Faxed Comments on Mitigated Negative Declaration From Tina Thomas, Partner in the Law Firm of Remy and Thomas Resoonses to Issues Raised Rel!ardinl! Short-Term Housinl! For Homeless Families at 31 Fourth Avenue, South Bay Community Services Relocation Assistance to Tenants Displaced From Their Homes, U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development ;2Jr~?j -i ~ Page 7 Meetim! Notes From an ADril 28. 1993. Cnmmunity Meetinl! on Short-Term Housinl!, South Bay Community Services 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for the Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista i7 _ T~]' 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. E~~f REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 12/90) Attachments: 1) 2) Vicinity Map Site Plan WPC F,\HOMEIPLANNING\979.93 ol./-cJ( -1--- ADDENDUM TO THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-93-36 South Bay Community Services Sixty-Day Short-Term Housing 31 Fourth Avenue PROJECT NAME: South Bay Community Services Sixty-Day Short-Term Housing PROJECT LOCATION: 31 Fourth Avenue PROJECT APPLICANT: South Bay Community Services, Inc. PROJECT AGENT: Robert, Bein and Frost/Shoulders and Sanford CASE NO.: IS-93-36 I. INTRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, if one of the following conditions is present: I. The minor changes in the project design which have occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; 2. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential environmental impact of the project, or regarding the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration. This addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information and analysis concerning drainage impacts. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions of the Negative Declaration have not changed. Drainage impacts are found to be less than significant for the proposed project. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the South Bay Community Services 60-Day Short-Term Housing for the Homeless IS-93-36 which will make the determination that mitigation for drainage under CEQA is not required for this project and therefore will recommend adoption of a Negative Declaration. :JJ- 3t) WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING..ADDENDUM Page 1 -10 - II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project is the conditional use of an eXlstmg multi-family apartment building for families in need of transitional housing. A maximum of 60 days is allowed. No exterior physical alterations are anticipated. Only minor interior alterations are anticipated. There are no changes in the project description . m. PROJECT SETTING The project setting consists of an existing 14 unit, two-story 9,412 sq. ft. apartment building on an 18,000 sq.ft. parcel located at 31 Fourth Avenue. The fourteen apartment unit building, constructed in 1972 consists of 2 two-bedroom units and 12 one-bedroom units. The current number or residents at this building is approximately 34 people. The units center around a landscaped courtyard. The pedestrian entrance to the complex is on Fourth Avenue and the parking area is in the rear of the complex - accessed from Fourth Avenue via Offerman Lane - a private road, and through a vehicular access on the property located at 17 Fourth Avenue. Eighteen parking spaces are provided for this building. IV. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS Drainage The previously circulated Mitigated Negative Declaration identified that there was a potential impact from inadequate drainage and that as mitigation, a monitor would field check the existing on-site drainage and that any problem would be corrected by the applicant. Engineering comments on the Initial Study had stated that "Ponding may occur adjacent to buildings". Subsequent to the circulation of the mitigated negative declaration and in order to obtain more specific information on the potential problem, the planning department staff and the engineering department staff went to the site to observe the situation. Because of the unevenness of the concrete slabs in the courtyard between the two apartment buildings at 31 Fourth Avenue, it was clear that if it rained the courtyard could become slippery and there could be safety hazards. At present, there was no apparent locations for some of the water to drain. Staff from the Engineering Department stated that if the soil were removed to a level of about two inches below the slabs in the areas that are cut for landscaping, drainage would be absorbed into the landscaped areas and the majority of the remaining water would drain from there out to the street. The checklist form, under the area of WATER, asks whether the proposed project will result in changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff. The answers to this question are then used to determine whether the project could potentially result in significant impacts. As the project is not requiring any new construction and there will not be any additional surfaces that will create additional runoff, and as the drainage problem is one that is in existence now and not created by this project, there is not a potential for a significant environmental concern. :J / ---3 I WPC F:\HOMBPLANNING\ADDENDUM -If - Page 2 V. CONCLUSION Drainage impacts are found to be less than significant. Pursuant to Section 15 I 64 of the State CEQA Guidelines and based upon the above discussion, I hereby fmd that as a result of additional or refined information available since completion of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and that these changes do not show the project will have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and that in fact they make the need for a "Mitigated" Negative Declaration a moot point and that the Negative Declaration, as amended, is adequate under the CEQA. REFERENCES c2 j- 3,A WPC f,\HOMElPLANNlNG\ADDENDUM .--IJ.-- Page 3 ADDENDUM A Potential Imnact Inadequate Drainage Mitil!ation Measure A monitor will field check the existing on-site drainage. Any problem will be corrected by the applicant. dl- JJ - I~ /' c - . = : Cf) .; 1 ~ ~i~ I...J Qi:lii I < ..I~> : i I~~ tn W '0 - > a: w fI) >- I- Z :) :i ~ o o >- c m % ... :) o en /' I ~ l!5l!5 F. ' __ Iti ~~~~~ tUl..l!C -ml!5l!5~E __t.l> ---IX ~8~~~ 9z"-o . . - .w ~~ ~~; i .- l di~ - - i:Ul i~-9 li~> ~~ f~~~ ~; IH ..... ~- c .-~~ c,,- ~!i ..... - ",- ci ~-- ~ c &I 81 = ...J...... ..I..... "iiiI: ill: ., -~ -~ ~~ ~~ - - ~~ ~~ - - >- >- !l::!~ . !l::!~ -I -I i(Lt= i(Lt= li:i~! li:i~! ~;.= I~.:; Ull') I') -a:: a:: lS , ~~"~ ~3Cru::>nW.S :IN as I >C3 ~J '!i ~~ c ,~ lS~ !i - ~ ~ ~ ~I i . ! iUl i I !i..; t: ~;~! ~~ ~lil l!l i~ 1>- iN W~ i~!E E! I~ ~~ -ll Ul!.. = t!!!! l;5 in '. .,;,:.. .Ot ,Z~ .Iil ..... , !i~ ~i , ~ ... (iL V ^ I ~d) 3NVl NVM:J3.:!..:IO )J<Jl! z ~ -10 Q..'1i I - W " !::~ UJ~ ,Ct ,Z~ II lSi: ~II ~ _.c E VII! 5S .. ~~I ~ I'I! II! ir .....if . ~il ~ L' %~ !~----~-~---~~~~~ _ I I f.._-f_ - . I r - - - - - - -- - - ..... - 1 __-.. --, I O. I I ... , I I I I , , , , , , I I I I ' I : I r--,'-'" " I .: I I II . t ,I ! I -' - - 1- -- - - :- - ~ B E - - ,- I- 1- r;- STREET " . . _' . J ,...,' : .' .:: .1. " , ~ .' I '. '.1 ... ~ 'I ~ "j.. , ,I,' "., ," . ,I , J J. 01 '. I t. .. ,I .i:~>~::~1:t..;r~J:,::::.; '. ".-. ......:. . .; ...~ .,.",......' ~y~ ., . . J '.. " I. _. ,,,,"". ,:' . " . J . . . . ....; ,,:".:- ''EUCAL TYPTUS PARK ,. . " .- :{&\'!~.:}.~~.;;:~~;F~,j:,Ji_, __, -_ - . .''-;;' I ~..J.;'I. .' J. ';1/'" .,' /" .;,' '1"" ,- " ~ .' ..' , . . ~.' .' . .... ~ :.,\ -.- : III :> ... .. z i --.- r l - i- I . I D -lL V STREET I I ! t I 1 I t , -- - , i- ~ > -il ~ (U I Tu ::1~t::l . , -,~ IWI i' I~ ---, I MIMI'''''''' > % ~ ---- -------- a: o Z PROJECT ___../ LOCATION !J~I D~~ ~ TI~_ '....... ~ _. -" ;- _ KIM A "",\ ~ T 1'1 .. ~ ~ I r- - --..- - - " :::::~ ..J. _,L -0f- ~ u .. -- ia: -. ~- .-- - . ..... - - [ :J~ fl'- : ! I r- ,...--- t l 11~L ., r I I I IU'FT !!~f I ,IIZ ---... - -.- -- '.' - _.- 1 r- -. .. -- ~. ._-- 1--'-.- f-- -.-- ~-l- --. ,--. -- ~- -.. j. f I ~-.: CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT (!) APPliCANT, SOUTIlBA Y COMML'?I:ITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SERVICES Short term housinl (up to 60 days) for homtless ADDRESS JI .'orIlTII A n:~T.: families for up to 50 people (Public/Quasi USt. SCALE. filE NUMBER Requires City Council approval) NORTH ." . 400' PCC. 93- 39 eJ./ ~ 55 /\ / ~ ' APPLICATION CANNOT BE AC~EPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER FOR OFFICE USE A. BACKGROUND INITIAL STUDY Cue No. "'7<.'_ 9'... ~ :cV-. Deposit ~ ;',:1.-' ~ ~o. Receipt N. ///~7S'- Date Rec'd 7 -~ Accepted by ~,;,. Project No. ~ -/...~ City of Chula Vista Application Form 1. To 15... \k,\-~""~,,,J 2. (Street address or description) " Assessors Book, Pel Parcel No. ~"b- O(.D-/o 3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCR TION --F\ uN'A- "'f.~~t- ""~'''*'-,t S. Name of Applicant Address ~\S ~..;~ City o-...\...lc. ~+A Name of Preparer/Agent Address City ~'"D~ Relation to Applicant State k\~ F':> Phone 42-0 - ~b2.c Zip q(&(IO r~.2.:t.> Phone 2.?1 ~'2--:n Zip q2Io~~ 4. 6. Indicate all permits or approvals nd enclosures or documents required by the Environmental Review Coo a. Permits or approvals required: ___ Public Project Annexation Redevelopment Agency O.P.A. development Agency D.D.A. ___ Otli ___ General Plan Amendment ___ Design Review Applicatio ___ Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Map ___ Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit ___ Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Map ~ Condo Use Permit Site Plan 1 Arch.Review ___ Variance ::: Project Ar.a Committee ___ Coastal Development Use Permit Permit b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator) . ___ Grading Plan Arch. Elevations ___ Parcel Map ::: Landscape Plans ___ Precise Plan ___ Tentative Subd. Map ___ Specific Plan ___ Improvement Plans ___ Other Agency Permit ___ Soils Report or Approvals .Requi red ___ Hazardous lIute Assessment ___ HydrOlogical Study ___ Biological Study ___ Archaeological Survey ___ Noise Assessment ___ Traffic Impact Report ___ Other IIPC 0413p/94S9P -1- )) <J~ I (P , ....- B. rROPOSrO PROJECT 1. a. Land Area: sq. footage "" i'Z,OCJD or acreage D,""'\ If land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose. b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings. or will existing structures be utilized? ~<z>'(~~~%--"6h.rt."S 2. Comp1ete this section if.project is residential. a. Type development: Single family Two family Multi family y, Townhouse Condominium , b. Total number of structures 2- c. Maximum height of structures Z. ~.~ IrS d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom f ~ 2 bedrooms 2 3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units ---3~ e. Gross density (DU/total acres) 31, \1- f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication) g. Estimated project population ~C) h. Estimated sale or [rental/price range ~ D-\5Z' /...... i. Square footage of structure 11"1-\"2- ~ j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures ?o."o k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided (er 1. . Percent of site inroad and paved surface "" :te'7o 3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or ~ jIll. t-J (1'1 a. Type(s) of land use b. Floor area Height of structure(s) c. Type of construction used in the structure d. Describe major access po~nts to the structures and the orientation to adjoining properties and streets t. Number of on-site par~ing spaces provided f. Estimated number of employees per shift . Number of shifts Total g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of tstimate ___ h. Estimated number of deliveries per day WPC 0413p/94S9P -2- J../- 3 7 ..-- 11')-' ~ i. EstimEted range of service area and basis of estimate j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings k. Hours of operation 1. Type of exterior lighting 4. If project is other than residential, cOlllllercia1 or industrial complete this section. -.../... a. Type of project b. Type of facilities provided c. Square feet of enclosed structures d. Height of structure(s) - maximum e. Ultimate occupancy load of project f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces h. Additional project characteristics C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS 1. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them. lL;~ 2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated f'JC (If yes, complete the following:) a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how .any cubic yards of earth will be excavated? b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed? c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded? d. What will be the. 'Maximum depth of cut Average depth of cut Maximum depth of fill Average depth of fill WPC 0413p/9459P -3- d./~J<6 --l~ ~ 3. lIill there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or from points of access which may impact th~surrounding or adjacent land uses? ,"0 A\~a." ~......, r .;~ \ 4. Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, el~ctrical appl1an e, heat ng equipment, :tc.). I.le A.-/c, v.~~ I.~) ,~.;.. 5. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project (sq. ft. or acres) ~ 6. If the project will result in any employment opportuniti,s ducr . u.- the nature and type of these jo s. .... \\l<A"t ON '+- ::::s"IC::/. "'"'*' iM.~.-r\u...""""~.... cz. Q ~'IV' "'.!.~ 7. lIill highly flammable or' potentially substances be used or stored site? tsl.., How many estimated automobile trips,per day, will be generated by the project? +e.ur: ~ C...if2..4l.>(c. ~'("~I.'.\-.e... ""'.l .......,~ c~S. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and thei r points of access or connect ion to the project sfte. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities. explosive lIaterials or within the project 8. 9. IJ~ D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1. Geoloov Has a geology study been conducted on the property? ~O (If yes, please attach) Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? ~() (If yes, please attach) 2. Hydroloov Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site? AiD (If yes, please .xplain in detail.) a. Is there any surface .vidence of a shallow ground water table? b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improv.ments on or adjacent to the site? IIPC 0413p/9459P -4- ;2,)-37 _\C\.~ . c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay? d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas? e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location. 3. Noise a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may impact the project site? ,;~ 4. Bioloav a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? NO b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property? Yes No (Please attach a copy). c. all trees and vegetation on the site. height, diameter, and species of trees, and be removed by the~pr ject. -+'->"l-\€ ~ e..: I , ., I ""l\ Indicate which (if .... S. Past Use of the land a. Are there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project site? N~ b. Are there any known paleontological resources? ~ c. Have there been any hazardous ,aterials disposed of or stored on or near the project site? ---iiO d. What was the land previously used for? ~ iT#i~ Me:: WPC 0413p/94S9P -5- d- J-LjiJ ..- d-O .- 6. Current land Use a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. <;..e ?'7_ b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent property. . North c.o,,,~,~...Q. - ,~ r~....,........+ .....~,..~ South 1Ii\F- - ~" "~r.g.} East .All f" - ~... ~~r'.e" West '1j1.\c.A , """-\'1(>~" ,,~ 7. Social a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) ~S-.{o b. Are there any current employment opportunities on\~i\e?l (If so, how many and what type?) p.'"br"A.t.~...f.... r""~ 1c:u.i<1..;CL1f"~ 8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project. ~ s~~ ....-\ "?I ~~.~ ~ It.\\{ ~ ~~ h ~re.J oc-J ~ 'e, 't-Ll..",'("~ c..;.rf~ (J..,Q,I";'1 .L~~ f{..e.. kOil'1~. A .fA-/.. i~,\l -h'c:l.;..c,F=- ~W1~'\<<' d;,~+C.MS {.., rL1~rc.,,-~I} of- r-ff-e",-tf S<t:.:W c,,;Ut..v?c.€l;.j ~....d.. QS" J.b -+r~~""'\/o.'O ....."cf. t-~'.IJ. CAtt.e WPC 0413p/9459P -6- de 1./1// .....~I..... E. CERTIFICATION or ~~'" Lc"..,1"", fxf'li..ol....Tlv.c J>\~~:t. ~~ 0""",, c..........-"l"1"1 ~.".,. '""" I, Consultant or Agent* HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my bel ief, the statements and information herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information concerning the project and its setting has been included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any enclosures for attachments thereto. DATE: *If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name. IiPC 0413p/9459P .7. 02./ ~ '/02 .- {);} - ij i 1 J:! I; J + ~ J ; ~I I C1)l& i~ II 158 I; c2)-l(] _ ~3- . '" H A ~YPICAL DAY FOR A FAMILY LIVIHO IH SOUTB BAY COMMUHI~Y SERVICES SBORT-~RM BOUSIHO AT 31 FOURTB AVEHUE F_milv aackaround Mr. and Mrs. Jones and their two children had been evict.d three months ago from their two-bedroom apartment for not paying rent for two consecutive months. They were unable to pay th.ir r.nt after their son .nt.r.d the hospital for a broken l.g and ankle suffered when falling off his bicycle. The Jones family had no family in the ar.a, and had been living with different fri.nds. After this arrangement became inconvenient, they ended up on the street. They went to local church for help and were referred to Lutheran Social Services, where they were given a meal, preliminarily scr.ened, and referred to South Bay Community Services. Screenina Process South Bay Community Services' Case Manager met with the family and obtained information on the family and its background. Th. son went to Mueller Elementary School in Chula Vista, the father had recently left the Navy, was working as a stock clerk at a local retail store, and was looking for a better paying job, and the mother was not working, but was looking after their four year old daughter. After following some of their references (inclUding their old landlord and the school administration office) to ensure the validity of their history, the Case Manager determined that the family was eligible to live at 31 Fourth Avenue. Next, the Case Manager reviewed the Bouse Rules, Program Regulations, and Case Plan expectations with the entire family. " Each of them agreed to abide by the rules and r.gulations and work toward becoming self-sufficient. Each signed copies of the rules and regulations. Joinina other Families After the Jones family settled in their unit, they join.d the r.st of the families for dinner in the community kitchen. Mrs. Jon.s " helped the volunteer teen group from a local church prepare dessert, since she liked to cook. Mr. Jon.s join.d some of his n.w friends to attend a class on op.ning and balancing a checking account pr.sented by a volunt.er from a local bank branch. Dev.loDina the C.s. Pl.n After br.akfast and before leaving for work and school the next day, the family met with the Ca.e Manager to d.v.lop th.ir -Case Plan". They work.d together to dev.lop a -mis.ion- - to become ..If-.uffici.nt and move back into .n .partm.nt near Mu.ll.r School within two months. They created three main goal.1 incr.... their family income, incr.ase their ability to k..p th.ir .partment, and ~ / -tj L/ _ :J-f- , & 11 increase their control over their lives. To meet these goals, specific, measurable objectives were created: 1. Their daughter would be enrolled in Episcopal Community Services' Parkway Bead Start program, and begin within one week. 2. The mother would now have more time to work. Because she needed training, she decided to enroll in the MAAC Project's Clerical Job Training program. After graduating from the six-week program, she would be assisted with finding a job. 3. She would also sign-up for literacy tutoring through the Chula Vista Literacy Team to improve her reading and writing skills. 4. Mr. Jones would continue working, but realign his work schedule to weekends and evenings, leaving enough weekday hours free to attend bookkeeping classes. Bis objective being a promotion to assistant store manager within six months. S. The Jones' would enroll their Bon in SBCS' Better Options After-School Today program at Mueller Elementary School. The program not only provides child care, but also offers homework tutoring and other learning assistance, and encourages parent involvement. 6. Ms. Jones would begin volunteering at the South Bay Family YMCA (across the street) for five hours a week to improve her clerical skills and would help cook dinners at 31 Fourth. 7. Mr. Jones would volunteer four hours a week at 31 Fourth assisting with landscaping, he would begin to teach his son Borne of the gardening and other skills he had learned from his father. 8. All family members would increase writing skills by keeping daily journals. 9. Both parents would attend parenting skills and independent living skills classes offered in the evenings at SBCS' office. with on-site child care. Classe. would include nutrition, ..al planning, shopping, budgeting, budgeting, and other skills. They would learn how to find an affordable apartment and understanding basic landlord/tenant relations and laws. 10. The family would participate in monthly resident council ..etings to evaluate the program and staff, and aodify procedures. ~h. Dav After developing the case plan, Mr. Jones took the bus to work, their son was driven to school with other children in the SBCS project van, and Ms. Jone. stayed with the Case Manager to work on enrolling their daughter in Bead Start and enrolling herself in job ~)-f~ ,~~- , I 12 training. She would be given bus vouchers to attend the training and her daughter would be taken to Bead Start in the project van. The son was able to join the after-school day care that same day. After a ride home in the SBCS van from the Program Director, he joined his family for dinner, a quiet evening, and an early bedtime. On weekends, the family would enjoy the same recreational and cultural activities as other Chula Vista families (i.e. parks, bayfront, fairs, etc.). These families are no different than any others. They are not homeless because of any personal or individual defect. MonitorinG and EvaluatinG a.sident'. ProGr... As families move toward self-sufficiency, their needs will change and their treatment plan will be modified. In order to review their progress toward attaining goals and objectives, the Case Manager will meet at least weekly with each family during their first three months in the program and every other week thereafter. The Program Director will review weekly progress made on individual cases and the Case Manager's performance. The Case Manager will also receive weekly clinical supervision from SBCS' Clinical Director, a licensed MFCC. Additional Hot.. Three meals would be provided to the Jones family and all other families. Breakfast would be served from 6:30am to 7:30 am, at which time bag lunches would be offered. Dinner will be served from 6:00pm to 7:00pm. Special arrangements will be made for individuals who.e schedule does not fit these times. SBCS has been given a van by the u.S. Marshalls Service for use transporting residents to school, work, and activities. To encourage independence, SBCS will offer free bus tokens to individuals able to utilize public transportation. Pinally, a number of community organizations have offered to transport residents as needed. c2J -1/ c::. ,.. }--lo ~ . .... / F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1. Current Zonina on site: North South ElSt West CITY DATA ClSe No. "lC:;' o\:~ ',3(" ~-,3 ~"'...~ ~ -,~ ~ 'Q.~ . roc' {') "orA. C - ~ Does the project conform to the current zoning? 2. General Plan land use designation on site: North South East West ,\-A......, ~~ ~~''''''cl ~,~~,c-.\ .......,) t J II y~. Is the project compatible with the General Plan land Use Diagram? \~. " Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? ~<.. Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? (If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route.) 3. School s If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: Students Generated From Proiect School Permanent CaDacitv Elementary Jr. High . Sr. High 4. Remarks: "-,c,-\ ~~'\<~. Temporary CIDacitv Current [nrol'ment OJ,. ....~"... ,"::, ~ C>" ~ ~\'O.K- I ~\~cd.v\"",\~ ~.C\~ \,\<,,;';:i' ( J ~.w ~r';; ~. 1/) ~{ . I Director of Pl.nni or R prese atlve -f"Q:'.l /F . /9 7~ Date IIPC 0413p/94S9P -8- ;2/_1-/7 - J-I)/ DE MINIMIS FEE UETERMINATION (Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AS 31S8~ ~ It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually or cumulatively on wildlife resources and that a "Certificate of Fee Exemption" shall be prepared for this project. _ It is hereby found that this project could potentially illpact wildlife, individually or cumulatively and therefore fees in accordance with SE!ction 711.4 (d) of the Fish and 'ame Code shall be paid to the County Clerk. "'1>"1' ~'~{ A. (#7 !~/ ) Enviro ental ReNiew Coo dinatOr ~/~/'1~ Date WPC 0413p/94S9P -26- ;2 / -L/[ ""d-~ - . - ClSe No. -7S-9..?-X H-1. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT 1. Is project subject to Parks & Recreation Threshold requirements? ~, If not, please explain. to \ n~ ~ t::bi"i-.'t('~ t!:: ~ ~ 2. How many acres parkland are necessary to serve the proposed project? ~ ~ 3. Are existing neighborhood and community parks near the project adequate to serve the population increase resulting from this project? ~ Neighborhood COllllllunity Parks 4. If not, are parkland dedications or other mitigation proposed as part of the project adequate to;:J.serv the population increase? Nei ghborhood ._ Community Parks S. To meet City requirements, will applicant be required to: Provide land? l' J i:!:. Pay a fee? I 6. Remarks: ~~,J ~. Pa ks and Recreation Director or Representative ~'l\.~ Date . IiPC 0413p/9459P -13- clJ -'17 .---;tq ./ . . G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ys- 567 /2E.v'5ED ClSe No. ;'S-q3-~ REV(5ED . 1. Drainaae a. Is the project site within a flood plain? ^,,,. If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary ~~. ,'0/ b. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? e=..lDd(..f!!. ~'Tb ~D~ ~.rdl'!: c. V..u:..Jo"",. PblJ.t>lo.l&.!Stl ~~ Are they adequate to serve the project? ~.,.,~r...... 'n:> 801'..... _ If not, explain briefly. ~&: t;;rnr. ~"-I""'c. 'r:JDA-/H.&:., IAAPb.r/~M~ MA'fI -.,: /J.C"---"'''y - d. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities?Sv,"l:"&-".C' F/~.I !J,.,ItTWklAb> ~re::. ~u~ A-V&rIJt.JC: ~ .b'">WNC-J""I'Jt~AA u.-"'hI. II.1/.e:",: WHfGJ-I b'c::.-'t~DI'"- ~ A "71a.~ ~~/1"'lII.1 C~A/tI.lI e. Are they adequate to serve the project? )1::~. Yo 11oI_~"'- 11.1 JeuI.!d=F RtcM If not, explain briefly. ~/A. SrrE. 2. TransDortation a. What roads provide primary access to the project? z:;."J>TH AI/bible. b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)? Nt'> II'C.I/.~'~E. e>V€1fL ExlcrJloIr. L)&: . c. What is the ADT and estimated level of service before and after project completion? 1./0 IN~ 1101 ~R"/C: tJENEMT'lDto,J. Before After A.D. T. n5'J;/') 17~ L.O.S. Lo5> 'G" "It.. ~.Q.. ~."c:."~~~ If the A.D. T. or L.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly. ~. d. Are the primary Iccess roads Idequate to serve the project? If not, explain briefly. YES.. ;)/ ~5?J WPC 84S9P -14. r~/ 6 YS -5'b 7 ~V(-;e:D e. ClSe No. ~~_ Are there any intersections at or near the 1l0int~~i"5~R1 result in an unacceptable Llvel of Service (LOS)? IVe. If so, identify: Location 1{/A 0 Cumulat he L.O.S. ,,\/.4 0 Is there any dldication required? YE'~ ~I.L!N(; R:r~ A~UJ;: 0 If so, pllase specify.F-GV~'T""'AII1'".JtJ'" ,e.:r -~~ ~A 1I;b(~-L.Itt..LE JJ~~l1. I:1r7zrrr /1../"'1'Jf1:. l!.n-vCc L!.I.Jr~~L A w' A AN 11I~'J~..ua.~ ~f:I::E.L &F ~IS t'fT>eCA/ WIU.st~t~drRl!l> "7t loW~d'n'fe? &/Jl4.a=-WIJm., SP\~ &iF &-.(t> er any ree . widening require, D - ~"""n If so, pllase speCify. ~.. Dt f. 51. h. Are there any other street 1aprovements required? Alo. If so, pllase speCify the general nature of the necessary improvements. IJ -4 . o 3. Soil s N/A 0 EX IS"""J~ ~~vc.~E5. ao Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? b. If yes, speCify these conditions. c. Is a soils report necess,ry? 4. land Form 5. Noite a. What is the average ~ slope of the site? What is the maximum~ slope of the site? 2% 5% b. Are there any traffic-related noise l.vel s iapact1ng the s1te that are significant .nough to justify that a noise analysis be rlquired of the applicant? 11#>. 6. ~aste Generation VPC '459P How auch solid and liquid (Iewage) .astl .nl be 'Ineratld by the proposed project ller day? " 1_ , ~~( ) :J.c/.6.~6v.pt. ~~ ~72.er<u.I..,-., I..D ElxJ. ~ So'1d .,...~ J:1E.1J~~~I....J. .Ltau1d &14nAM: ~~.~..,.~.,_......,.,,.,.J What is the location and size of existing sewer 11nls on or downstream from the site? B"w:.pIl.J r:;,,~ AfIbJ'-- ..~(,., In- Vl:P "'OI'IIAI_~'" 1M ,,~" _zeor-. Are they adequate to servI thl proposed project? ~. cJ /-.5/ ..--3// -15. Y5-5'=-7 f?Ev'rSE.P 7. R~marks Case No. .E;-Q3-3f. T2€v'/SED WPC 9459P Please identify and discuss any remaining potenttal adverse i.pacts, .ttfgatton .easures, or other issues. ~ ~0 Cfty Eng neer or Representattve t/1/9'3 Date ' d)-Q -16- r ,.9-/ ~ " M E M 0 RAN 0 U M " " June 3, 1993 . " - . ..\ ~ ":"" 00. . % 'e -. - :; r:" , '" .. ~ . \ FROM: Russ Collins, Sweetwater Authority Bill Ullrich, Senior Civil En9ineer Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer Roger Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer Mary Jane Oiosdado, Crime Prevention Unit Rod Ha.tie, Captain, Fire Department Barbara Reid, As.ociate Planner '-f'l'/~"(.,( \ '" .'. . '1'0: ," ",- '. \ \' ~ ~ $ " ": \J ,," ., -' \" SUBJECT: South Bay Community Services-3l Fourth Avenue " , ~ . 'Thank you for your comments regarding the application for a Conditional Use Permit for the above cited address, The applicant tlas revised the project description as attached. I will be contacting you to determine it the requirements you forwarded previously will still apply, I would appreciate a written response by June 9, 1993. However, I will contact you prior to that time to obtain your verbal comments, '1'hank you in advance, " Barbara Reid ~ I~~~wn-k~~~ .0, ~ jt;~~~~~44f.~{ ~JtN~ M~~i4#-: a ~ ~&4!dt:'hY~ Ct///4J~ r . dI ~;/ /ZtJ/l, ~ ~A<tlPA'J~# ~ r_---..:......' ~ ~1' ,P~.~"r-r~' Wav( (,/ll/f3 ,) I -~~3 3/ 3 - . . 315 4th Avenue. Suite E . Chula Vista. CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/ 50S1 May 27, 1993 Barbara Reid Martin Miller City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Ms. Reid and Mr. Miller, South Bay Community Services has decided to modify its project description for the short-term housing facility at 31 Fourth Avenue. Instead of removing the kitchens from the 14 units, we will be leaving the kitchens in place; we will not be installing a commercial kitchen or providing congregate meals. We anticipate that our rehabilitation costs will be less than $15,000 and will consist mainly of deferred maintenance repairs, carpet replacement, termite work, and painting. We do not anticipate the need for a building permit for this rehabilitation. As a result of leaving the kitchens in place, we will have a maximum capacity for 43 tenants plus the 1 property manager. This has been calculated as follows: , , en'! b!'~rt:'of"'!I @ 3 per~..;nf; .. ,? pt!'reonc 6. _J 2 two bedrooms @ 5 persons - 10 persons 1 one bedroom @ I manager - I Derson 44 total If you require additional information, please call me at 420-3620. ~enlY' j JJh, O/!m(k IVathe ine Lembo txe ~ive Director ........."..-... . ~~ \-:,"'....... \. ~ "!'"' -\:>"_'J( '" V' c , ' d/-s;l /~+" -. l '- APP':NDIX I ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM (To Be Completed By lead Agency) I. Background 1. Name of Proponent -.so.",/) fic..( l("lrlllllll.1'4 ,:sc~...:. '-C,>,; 2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent ,~/'<5 'I'll) Hvcl'u '<:;_;1".E (hule. L'rSlil {'f', 9/910 3. 4. 5. Date of Checkl i st ~ 117 /9 oj' I Name of Proposal "'~r:,'''' 'i-L-"rL ,fJc~<"r:; Init i al Study Number ::::; 5" 93 '0 .:;> (.., -rc" 1b:p.J.c....:> /II- r, ,~-" (.~.... J II. Environmental Impacts (Explanations of all "yes" and "maybe" answers are required on attached sheets.) ~ MAYBE HQ 1. Earth. Will the proposal result in: a. Unstable earth conditions or changes in geologic substructures? b. Disruptions, displacements, compaction or overcovering of the soil? c. Change in topography or ground surface relief features? ~/ # ,--- .J:C d. The destruction, modification of any or physical features? covering or unique geologic I/' J / ~~;;-~ {- - 3 IIPC 9459P -20- . e. Any increase in wind or water erosion of sol1 s, either on or off t1.! site? L f. Changes in deposition or erosion of beach sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which .ay modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or lake? L g. Exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, .udslides, ground failure, or similar hazards? ,/ 2. Air. Will result in: a. Substantial air emissions or deterioration of ambient air quality? L b. The creation of objectionable odors? . ./ c. Alteration of air movement, moisture, or temperature, or any change in climate, either locally or regionally? .' 3. Water. Will the Proposal result in: a. Changes in currents, or the course or direction of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? ~ b. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff? v c. Alterations to the course or flow of flood waters? ..J.-'" .2/~ ,,3~/ WPC 9459P -21- -. d. Change in the amount of surface water in any water body? 0/ e. Discharge into surface waters, or any al terat i on of surface water qual i ty, i nc 1 ud i ng but not 1i lilted to temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity? ./ f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow of ground waters? L g. Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct addi t ions or wi thdrawa 15, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? L h. Substantial reduction in the amount of water otherwise available for public water supplies? ~ 1. Exposure of people or property to water re lated hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? ./ 4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or number of any species of plants (including trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic plants)? ..J::" b. Reduct i on of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants? ~ c. Introduction of new species of plants into an area, or in a barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species? ./" - eJ/;57 - ;/)- WPC 9459P -22- d. Reduction in acreage agric~ltural crop? of any ...JC 5. Ani.al Life. Will the proposal result in: a. Change in the diversity of species, or numbers of any species of animal s (birds, land animals including reptiles, fish and shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? ,./ b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique, rare or endangered species of anima ls? ....:::"" c. Introduction of new species of animals into an area, or result in a barrier to the mi grat i on or movement of animals? ..JC d. Deteri orat i on to exist i ng fi sh or wildlife habitat? L 6. Noise. Will t~e proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? ./ b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? _/ 7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new light or glare? -'../ 8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a substantial alteration of the present or planned land use of an area? .--- d / off( / 3~~ WPC 9459P -23- 9. Natural Resources. result in: Will the proposal a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural resources? 10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve: a. A risk of an explosion or the release of hazardous substances (including, but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation) in the event of an accident or upset conditions? b. Possible interference with an emergency response pl an or an emergency evacuation plan? 11. Population. Will the proposal alter the location, distribution, density, or growth rate of the human population of an area? 12. Housing. Will the proposal affect existing housing, or create a demand for additional housing? Will the 13. Transportation/Circulation. proposal result in: a. Generation of substantial additional vehicular movement? b. Effects on existing parking facilities, or demand for new parking? c. Substantial impact upon existing transportation systems? d. Alterations to present patterns of circulation or ~vement of people and/or goods? WPC 9459P -24- .;2/ ~~c; ~ ..... ~ ..:::: ./ ./ ,/ ---- ~ / 3~- e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air traffic? v f. Increase in traffi c hazards to motor vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? v 14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered governmental services in any of the following areas: a. Fire protection? v b. Police protection? -- c. Schools? ./ d. Pa rks or facil \ties? other recreat i ona 1 _ v e. Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? .,/ f. Other governmental services? ./ 15. Energy. Will the proposal result in: a. Use of substantial amount of fuel or energy? ....../ b. Substantial increase in demand existing sources or energy, require the development of sources of energy? upon or new ;./' 16. Thresholds. impact the Policies? Will the proposal adversely City's Threshold/Standards ~ ~ / -~!l ___ t.f 0 ,- WPC 9459p -25- 17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in: a. Creation of any health hazard or potential health hazard (excluding ental health)? ~ b. Exposure of people to potential health hazards? .....!:/ 18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic vista or view open to the public, or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? ./ 19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an impact upon the qual ity or quantity of existing recreational opportunities? ,/" 20. Cultural Resources. a. Will the proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? ./ b. Wi 11 the proposal result in adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure, or object? L c. Does the proposal have the potential to cause a physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ./ d. Will the proposal restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact area? ~ ;2/"t/ _ 4'''- WPC 9459P -26- 21. Mandatory Findings of Significance. WPC 9459P a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? ./ b. Does the project have the potent i al to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage or long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) ./ c. Does the project have impacts whi ch are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the envi ronment 15 significant.) v d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? "./ -27- .,)/~~;Z ~LPJ ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST EARTH As the proposed project consists of renovations to the interior of an existing multi-family apartment building, there will be no changes in topography, or conditions that could lead to an increase in wind or water erosion. No unique geologic physical features exist on the site. AIR The project is in conformance with the existing Air Basin Plan. There could be a minor traffic/air quality reduction if fewer of the tenants drive cars as certain studies indicate. WATER This project is not in the Coastal Zone and there are no rivers or wetlands or other sensitive aquatic resources within the ID:mediate area that could be impacted by the project. The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that the developer will request and deliver to the City a service availability letter from the Water District. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. Engineering staff have noted that there is the potential for some drainage impacts as a result of potentially inadequate on-site drainage. This is considered potentially significant as it creates a safety hazard. A Mitigation Measure to reduce this to below a level of significance has been included in the Negative Declaration. PLANT AND ANIMAL LIFE The project is in an urbanized area of the City and the site, if not first disturbed previously, was disturbed in 1972 when a multi-family apartment building was constructed. There are no sensitive or endangered plant or animal species in the immediate area. The project is in an urbanized area of the City. The multi-family apartment building proposed for use by SBCS was constructed in 1972 and has been in continual use as an apartment building since that date. NOISE Potentially, because the proposed use could house more residents than at the existing facility, 43 residents in addition to a resident ",anager, this would be an increase in the number of people in the facility from 34 currently to a total of 44 residents. There is an expectation that as a result there could be an incremental increase in noise. However, it is expected that the sounds of children and adults will be minimum as the program developed by the South Bay Community Services makes use of off-site facilities for counseling, day-care job training for residents and their children as well as local schools. Therefore, noise is not expected to be a significant impact. The proposed use is similar to existing uses, that is as a multi-family dwelling. There is expected to be approximately 9 more people living at the site than the current number of residents. However, due to the expected c2/ r? J Pagel /' /' f3 WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\968.93 reduction in resident vehicles from the present use, there would be no substantial change to the existing environment of the site ill regard to vehicular use. In fact, there may be a slight reduction in noise. LIGHT AND GLARE Staff in the Crime Prevention Unit of the Police Department recommend security lighting in all areas around the buildings, walkways and parking area. In order to avoid potential lighting impacts, a condition will be included that security lighting will not negatively impact surrounding residents. LAND USE The proposed project would continue in effect the multi-family dwelling use of the site. However, it will alter the structure of the possible long-term tenant to short-term temporary housing for the homeless - under a conditional use permit. Concerns were raised regarding noise, traffic, and increase in density, and public safety issues. Each of these issues has been discussed in the appropriate sections of the Initial Study. NATURAL RESOURCES No natural resources are expected to be impacted. The proposal, therefore, is not expected to increase the rate of the use of natural resources. RISK OF UPSET No hazardous materials or substances will be stored on site. Therefore, there cannot be a risk of an explosion or release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or upset conditions. In the meeting with a representative of the Fire Department, Fire Department staff commented that they have adequate emergency access to the site and that two fire hydrants are in close proximity to the site. POPULA nON There may be a very minor increase in population at this site from the current 34 residents to a maximum of 43 residents. This does not substantially alter the population characteristics of the area. HOUSING The proposed project could create a demand for a small amount of additional housing as the residents go through the process of becoming self-sufficient, obtaining employment skills and obtaining employment. Because of the small number of residents, the existing housing stock in the City of Chula Vista will be adequate to serve the project residents. WPC BIIOMElPLANNlNG\968.93 :2/ ~? i Page 2 .r -tf'~ TRANSPORT A TION/CIRCULA TION No substantial Increase in traffic generation is expected as a result of this project. In fact, there is an expected decrease in traffic since fewer of the residents are expected to have vehicles. (See attached survey completed by SBCS of other similar facilities and the parking needs.) Traffic safety hazards were' cited as a concern in the project area specifically the legality of use of the access easement to the property, the fact that a number of traffic accidents have occurred On Fourth A venue in the vicinity of the facility and that there could be additional vehicles servicing the facility particularly as a result of the provision of the congregate kitchen. The question of the applicant's legal access to the site upon purchase of the property has been resolved by the title company. There is adequate turnaround space and access for emergency vehicles as reviewed by City Traffic Engineers and Fire Department staff. As only a small number of the future residents are expected to have vehicles, there is not . expected to be an increase in traffic accidents. (See attached survey completed by SBCS of other similar facilities and the parking needs.) The project description no longer includes a congregate kitchen. The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. . Engineering staff commented that the primary access roads are adequate to serve the project. . As Fourth A venue is designated as a four-lane major street in the City's General Plan. an irrevocable offer of dedication will be required to meet the half-width standards of said designation. The requirement for an offer of dedication is not just as a result of this project, but is required by the Engineering Department as a result of the application for a conditional use permit. : PUBLIC SERVICES A. FirelEMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is 1.25 miles away and would be associated with a 3 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this rhreshold Standard. WPC F:\HOMElPLANNIN0\96I.93 d-./- &.~ Paae3 (, ~~. The Fire Department is also requiring standard fire prevention equipment and facilities on-site, such as detectors and fire extinguishers. Staff from the Fire Department have also indicated that they have adequate emergency access. B. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The . Police Department has indicated that the proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Specifically, a Senior Analyst with the Police Department commented that the general consensus among departmental staff was that the increase in police calls for service as a result of this type of housing is negligible. As with any increase in the number of residents, there is a corresponding expectation that calls for service will increase slightly. However, this project does not create any unique concerns. The staff in the Crime Prevention Unit of the Police Department recommend standard crime prevention measures. They recommend that management re-key each unit as it is re-assigned to a new family by installing an electronic locking system in which each unit may be accessed by the use of a pass key computer card. Staff further recommend trimming back trees and shrubbery supplemented with security lighting in all areas around the building. Further the Police recommended that addresses be clearly displayed at the main entrance and unit designations at each door. The Crime Prevention Unit is available to provide a security survey with specific recommendations prior to any occupancy and to provide training and assistance for the on site management in maintaining a "neighborhood watch" atmosphere. These standard measures are not unique to this project and are considered prudent security measures for any project. C. Schools The existing school system' is not expected to be impacted by the small number of children who will be residing in this facility and the transitional nature of the residency. D. Parks As this project consists of the renovation of existing multi-family housing and as multi- family housing is not covered by the threshold/standards policy for' Parks and Recreation the applicant is not required to pay impact fees or dedicate park land. E. Energy The proposed facility is not expected to substantially increase demand on existing energy sources or to create a need for new energy. WPC F,1II0ME\PLANNING\968.93 ~) -~(, Page :4b / UTILITY AND SERVICE SYSTEMS The proposed project is not expected to create a need for any new utilities or service systems. The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City engineering standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with sewer master plans and City engineering standards. The existing 8-inch VCP in Fourth Avenue and lO-inch VCP downstream in "C" are adequate to serve the project. HUMAN HEALTH This proposed project will not create any human health problems. AESTHETICS As no changes are being made to the building, and as the building at present does not impact any scenic vistas or views to the public, the proposal will not result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view. RECREATION The small number of people who will be residing in this residence will not result in a negative impact to the quality or quantity of existing recreational opportunities. CULTURAL RESOURCES There are no significant cultural resources in the area. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. While the City is not required to prepare a negative declaration where a categorical exemption is appropriate (Guidelines 15301), as is the case here, the City recognizes that transitional housing is often controversial and that a negative declaration provides the public with an opportunity to comment on the project and to better refme mitigation measures. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fISh or wildlife species, cause a fISh or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples ofthe major periods ofCalifomia history or prehistory. The proposed project consists of the renovation of an existing multi-family apartment building within an urbanized area of the City. There are no known significant biological or historical or prehistorical resources on the site. WPC Fo\llOMFJ'LANNlNG\968.93 ~ / -I." ? Page 5 '7'" /f 2. The project has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. One of the City's Long Term Environmental Goals (found in the Housing Element of the General Plan) is to recognize that homelessness is a regional problem and that the provision of transitional housing in the South Bay is a means of addressing that problem. The approval of this facility is in accordance with the City's General Plan and would be a meaningful step towards achieving the short-term goal of the provision of housing to assist the homeless and would also be a step toward the long-term City goal of answering the homeless' problem. 3. The project has possible effects which are iIIdividually limited but cumulatively considerable. As used ill the subsection, "cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of an iIIdividual project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. This project does not have the potential to be individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The environmental analysis contained in the Initial Study considered potential cumulative impacts. It was determined that there was a very minor cumulative improvement to traffic and air pollution due to the expected project-related reduction in traffic. 4. The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Substantial adverse effects on human beings usually result from hazardous materials, noise, safety hazards, etc. One existing potential safety impact was cited, due to potentially inadequate existing drainage. Mitigation is possible to remedy this existing impact and thus reduce it to a level below significant. Thus, no substantial adverse effects on human beings either directly or indirectly are expected. d/-?Y WPC F:\HOME\PLANNING\968.93 Page 6 II ,.,LP r SWEETWATER AUTHOR I. 't.~~, '~.':'." ...) . ',~ ~ ~.. ~.;.../~,' ~~.t;;'O"-,,,,,/ 505 GARRETT AVENUE POST OFFICE BOX 2328 CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91912.2328 (619) 420.14'3 FAX (6191 425-7469 June 9, 1993 .JJL .0 GQVERNtNG BOARD SUE JARRETT. CHAIRM....."" BlA) POCKUNG10f"L \liCE CHAIRMAN EOWtN J STEELE GEORGE H W....TERS MARGARET A. WELSH JAMES S WOLNIEWICZ CARV f _ WRtGHT WANDA AVERY l1=IEASUFtER OlAN J REEVES SECRET.6.RV.ADMtNISTRATtVE AIDE Ms. Barbara Reid City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue chula Vista, CA 91910 SUbject: WATER AVAILABILITY PROPOSED SHORT TERM HOUSING FOR THE HOMELESS 31 FOURTH AVENUE CASE NO: 15-93-36 SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 1993 Dear Ms. Reid: ~ . This letter is in response to the additional information received concerning the conditional Use permit for the subject project within the Sweetwater Authority service area. There is a 16-inch A.C. water main located on the east side of 4th Avenue adjacent to the proposed development. The Authority's records indicate that there is one existing water service which serves the property. Enclosed is a copy of 1/4 SEC. 136 map which shows these facilities. Since this is an existing apartment complex where the plumbing will not be modified and the existing facilities meet the fire department's requirements, the Authority will continue to provide water service to the site. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Russell Collins at 420-1413, ext. 239. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY ';'\ .) ,\ l\. . ('yv..-!.. <- .,..::.""--' ~ ,- James L. Smyth -Acting Chief Engineer enclosure: photocopy of 1/4 SEC. 136 map k:\lorelei\wpS1\eouthboy.wlt , pc: Russ collins, Sweetwater Authority South Bay Community Services <1) 31 Fourth Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910 0< ~ h {:; A Publir Agfllc.\, I Srr,'ing Xalionol Cily, Chula ~'is/a and Surrounding Arra.\ ,kq/ 51 )...f'g_ - '" -i- ~ ::> z ~ ~ -- ... ! I- .-1- .... r-- -.1- , .. I I ...... # _...q' "" -....~/ .I~.7 ITE ;.c . :.. ~:; .~:: ..... ~-.- "e" C ... 'It w.. . ~I 135 -ft.~ U NI. " c...... .... ...., 10M' ~.~ I -. . " ..- MO.. _II e )F P;RoSEb ~r~ll~MENTl ~ ;. ~_.-: r \. I = ~ " ' o~., ,.. \..:., 11..-:. I /; _~."I"'''.'''''' -I........'ff...- ~ . ..,...:-...~~:n..rr..-.rw....T-.... ~Jt:;:.;::~ ... ....&1...... == .. Ii. . . .~ ;~.(..,_a:""". / ~!' .1I~ !.{I/ !.' oS.. <:~ /k", \J~ 0 ./ .'It _ M", Nt:~.... J ......... - )"//) '1 ,'-'-. 'l">~~" I\') /'1 t b' ~~ '. -!1 -j ~It~ . ' .:. ~ . Ii. ..... ,. ~ . , I! C' 1,. ~~ .. ....I : · Lt, :~'. (~~a ~l " ~~ ,~.. ~, IJ':' I t/! I I :~hU.. . I J ~- I~ ::=:L r : ~ i . '~~.~ I r,; - I ':'..I.- '.j,,"i ..~ 1Lfi ..... .It. ...0.... ~ ...., ru .. ..... I-=: '..,., 4 : ....-:. t- . J::: .t."'r! ~!I ;~'''ir. I!! -.a"" 0 ~_ g;: f!i'~'r. YAAI N wARD! I ; r. J: -, II j;' i ;g.'ti' . p 1439: : i:. . ti : ........ . /j":: 0 '1 :~ _: ei I ~.. . 0..:..::' - "...... : D .1 l ; ...... ~ ~ I.::' r :: - ~ . ~ i i :l: I I ":~I": [,J~ ~ ~~1 ;;'J'/" ~ ~ Ii ti ~ UBI: : J PI.} · . ~ [614 -:.. P . . ~- -.' . '"",' · . ,'I..., . : I I . : ., ..-,~ ~ ..~ ,'0" .., ......... J ...>,,-.,' ..(: .....IH.I..' .a.... J:... '- "'....UM.t~:' ....... 1":,, ~11 I I ......~..~ (".,~ -...... ,'..... ..., .~.~ ,....'.lJ1ft I ~. ~,. . ( I ~ ;:;~. r:= U 1:.0 .""'1 . .,. .... .... '., I --' -' .' .!- I _IA ..... .., . !:.:: Jt..= . ~._"ti '0 ~ I ..~ ..;: : :;:;. ~," -:~ ..... ....' ""1 I ...It.. 1_ --- t.:, 1 'I.'. -',..... I. . !oi . , ":: Ie:: . c......, . I "!{M -:'n . .....-.....--... t f : 1 ,", ~ r_s~. !I'.. ..... t f , ,________ .1... I f~ ;,:~:.::.~~.....:i.-:.::..-J.---hT-~ ........! ....It'\ .~. ~ it: ...... ..,.. -! I r......u -; ..'I.:J. -rei ..~... -, 0" o I I ., -:"'I,.. -;, · I I.. :~:~F ::::~. , ....1~ i .' I ......... ~ I ...... ., . "'''.'., '" I j. 0:':' .:: I : 2' .11~1 'I '.~ I &II t,r-=:-- ' "'......... ... .._.. , .. .~".. > I E~':, RAY .. T~RRA E 11_ - ~-___.__o._uo., , . ~ 0"" II..' ...... .'..'= ."........ I .1------ ..., 12 .,......, L I 1 ......,~ 1- ... ... I. 1 - .. Z! ' ...- ~--u----.-----""24--- ___..m~ ......J : :10 .~ : .: -.... .')/ __ '/ /J ~: ......f ! ;.. .. ]', -.~ i\i... )1..... - c;::>4 / V ~. .' "'2t"..!.~ :1: .JP,,,,,. -... .o-or,;; ~ ......; ; "'!~tf; ...: ::lOU'I: . ... a:'1 I .-1."". FII ZI :'1:' .. . ,..'" ,..., :.,. .., ,...., .: .....u#> ....0 ."Ie '.......sl ~ 1:1 ..,' . .~ , 0' -I .. o. 'rt-' """" ........ -- .~ 41". ...,-.........D rat , t '. ... ......,....... I. I .. 11"\ :-J tr ;;: 8 U wr .~ I,;j ~ J,,'w.\ ~ - . .~.-o. >>!., u ... . !II! a ..U~ ~_ a- t;,. <t- / ~~I" im....." II - - I~\ :aJ ' 1""- t IQ Pf(~ ~ ...... "'- ........ , . ......,. . to I . ,.... - ~ '- -- 1(; .- Inll :'=T. li~ .~JHH:i ! I --.. ...... 110";. , CJ. ~ .....c. . ~... , - ..I.. ....: '11' ",' -.. 1- . ..- ""10 ..... e_ 1= - J: I ::"'~I~ :ttr- - .1. u 170" . ~~.o. 1M' -- - II '.'Jf. ~ '. ot'!' .. .' .' , ., ., " ,,... ..... . ... r- ~, .I ---1..-... :vo~~ ;' . 'N.?' , .....~ ' .. 'j.; .,,~ "",' I 1..,,;---- r- ~. .. r I I ... ...'~ L .' ,....~soe ,/'tY' f v?' .-. .-....... .__ -i JI " ~,~:'.{ , ., ,. '..- ., ~ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 9.'eetwater Au1:llOrity 505 Garrett Ave. (hula Vista, CA 92010 JUNE 2, 1993 31 FOURTH AVENUE '!his letter will serve to confirm that existing water supplies and fire hydrants are adequate for fire protection, purposes for this developrent. CAroL A. roVE FIRE MARSHAL CAG/l a cc. Barbara Reid Planning Dept. d.)~7/ ,../--- "..~ ROUTING FORM ! DATE: May 10, 1993 .- .. \1;:. tt~Y 12 :':1 \I: ~.) M -.. -..... !l'O : ~PLANNIN3&FACllil. c Ken Larson, Building & Housing John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only) Cliff Swanson, ~ngineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only) Carol Gove, Fire Department Harty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department Current Planning Gordon Howard, Advance Planning Bob sennett, City Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR) Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) Other ., '00-. '. -~ ~". FROM: Barbara Reid Environmental Section SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS- 93-36IFA-~IDCI -010 ) Checkprint Draft ErR (20 days) (EIR-____IFB-____/DCI ) Review of a Draft ErR (EIR-____IFB-_/DP) Review of Environmental Review Record FC- ERR-_) The Project consists of: A Conditional Use Permit to allow transitional or short term housin9 (up to 60 days) for homeless families in a 14 unit apt. complex. The project will house up to 50 individuals at one time. 31 Fourth Avenue Location: Please review the document and forward.to me any comments you bave by 5/14/93 Comments: If additional buildings are constructed. school fees will be required. d/-?~ - :;};;.- Planning . 2i ~ ) ~ 't I I g- ". ~Ji I II II :t=i, I: !i ....: ~ 1&'.' .... ~ .... 'Ie l.. .~, ...., _" Q' 11 .,,' ...... c';:' '., C ..0 _. -t~..1I'- .1. ..I. T .' ~- '-JJ: · o. r.... I~."<I.O -, 'It .~- ~-.~. - ' ... T. ...~... ---- ~'Y 1........1 : I, -.. ---.... : ! ,~t~~;.:;'---lt! ~ / -ITE ~F PRO': 1Eb Dl~':~€~: tHENT 1 L-i .. I,...t ._1 ., .,...,.. .. " " ..c I .. CMI .,Ia' . .. I , .. .: : ..... i.- ~ I ._, ~l' I Q .. : ~ .jf_.........":,L....:'I'I'n_:ii1\.. ' , -J. " .....:;._~..:r;~.:;:---;~on--n;..onr.....---.~Wi ~L:\~ .... " _06U.o4 1'== . i::; .a ~~~~;jy I /~~ ~W1 ~~~ / ,,~~~ / <t !H~.~ ~J!~);, Qt-'-, ':~ I"-~ '" ~1' ""'~ ~ )' '\i..:i~\ 'I ..... :1 I~.' a I ~ / ~ I" l~ · \... .!""f' I.J I ~v.' ~ ~ .. ':'::::...F;~ .....~.. I{:::;. 0 ~ r G. !,)' "';' \~n ~... - R. of. (~.a NI r;i ,-..,. , , ~, :-- "i:':tl ~: i i Ii I t{.f "... _ . 1-.. ....... d .. LL:., . i..J.! l. _,:'" ~ R 'Z l~ ... . U~~.1 ,...~" _~ ~; ~'-j I '[3 " ..- 1: ;' i.~' NW:E l t --~_.-~" ~ .. .I...i --I<;" '1LJ: ..... . N . . ..0.... ~ ..." ~.~ t .~M .~ lr. 4 : .....::41 r:':S'" '~j= ,'1 .i W~~: 1l!1 i ~ ~ -.'J.L:"':'''- :0::- ~ c- .1. ~ 'N .'O,.~ 'I I , . '1Cl II . -~ ~b ~"p 14' 9 i : i i .!I' 11 ~IJ "h4\. :: ~ j.S 0 ;:~ .. l 2: ........... . .. -:.............. : 0 .1 t: 1 ~ ...III~ . r~""~' ,~;z., . o ... :......;. _.: -.J of t CPt ..:: -. ~ UB ; : ..1 'I.~ ..~.~., r.J,.b' . ~ :. ~j' : ~ 'i:!t ~ I': I ~I I: .J J w,'5.c 1:.....' ,;; II. (i.., 4: I " ..', .., W.o.I... -: I.h~....._"" _.-...... oS'!. ..1Ic.. ~ ,;.......)"'t~':'I . .......:'. ~11 I I -,.:",. ~~I ':"-i' "'n".', ....... ..." ~ ...._v.. .'W"i:Ift.;; .. .,. . '- ~ ... r. .'- U ~ ....w: I . .t ". y' ".. I Jr .-- . .' .,... I _ECL ..... ;-: !:; I ~:; ti-~_. ...-"1.' ..~.,.. I...., ......._ ~ .:i :~: ~6' c' ~;:.'t ~ I "!f"~ I': I c _...___..__., I I :, ,- =LJ_~.; _, Z 'II; , ......., : : .l-:7.:: ~-- --;,;.~;: """"oIJ ""~ . ~~ ..... Wo.,,, - " ;.:~~=-~=--..;~-:==--.i-_. I j,------,. -~.- , ~ I'll "0' '-; ...... 1_ Nr:'D. ........ I: IS : II i, ..::~:t. r-" :::; : ~ ~'! . h. !:. .'." _ ~....... 1_ ..... f. I .......:.r I ...".. ~ ili ';;O'~ - : iii : 22 il~ II ~-g "'''''_'00 .__.up", .."." > z El: RAY:: .:n,:RRAI.-E IS= - -. __, I ::;.. .'. '.. ,,ll..,,. --it\l."' ' ~~'::'f: -= - ~:;:::.:..... .....-- t ~ .l--=::::~ - : .. ..d. ~J ~I 15 :: ..,...... i= - .... -u-n-u--.n.....c:'4--- _____n~ ....~, : Xl ,j: .' ...... .) I -?:;J .' 1-", ~ ......t : Pi".. -i" _,At. ~.. .II"... 0< p1~'"6.''''' llD ' lit' " UAD U 0 . ..... ~ ~...... . ....,....E.. !, S -, , I "-,run 1___; ..~. :: ...~~~~.. MH" ..,. - "'" / LL ~ IEII ~ . .. . r .- t; ... . ; ....:..- .........11 - -j- l&J ::> Z l&J :J. ~.{ ; / 8 "..11'. &"AJ 'Ilt . . i J~~r. ~o ..... - 'I II... . - - '7"" - - ~ .-- :: =T- - 1"'" : 1= flliil In ;;~:i 5 I '. """'~~ ~-- '-'101." I , .0....1 ~ .... ~III , "- .,/-1""(1 I.'" .r:I. --- .-... f I '~.....~.,ft_ . 110' .,' Col. ~ ..u. . ':=.... I - ..L_.~.: ( ... r I L . - POI - :c I m:1~ ...... - t-- ....,~~oe ~3 ,., f'" ,-" ... DATE: May 18, 1993 Barbara Reid, Environmental Section Mary Jane Diosdado, SCPS~J Crime Prevention, PD r.J/'./'''r' Initial Study, 31 Fourth Av J\../I,. TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Comments regarding this project have just recently been provided to Martin Miller, Planning Associate for a Conditional Land Use Permit. My primary concerns were to improving the exterior lighting and landscaping. In addition, I recommended upgrading the building security. I have spoken directly with the Project Administrator and we will be working together on these recommendations. Attached is a copy of those recommendations. If you have other concerns that need to be addressed, please contact me at 691-5127. c2/~71 rJ~ _?T FROM: May 14, 1993 Martin Miller, Associate Planner Via Acting Captain w~n, Investigations Mary Jane Diosdado, S~f.~~1 Crime Prevention Unit ~f7V Short Term Housing for Homeless REC':::JVCO M.qr l.'f ':0 DATE: TO: PL/i:Vi " SUBJECT : Upon reviewing the plans for 31 Fourth Avenue, I discussed some issues with Kathryn Lembo, South Bay Community Services. With the upcoming re-modeling of this location, we discussed possible considerations to improving each unit's security. Although most of the improvements are planned for the interior of each unit,. i.e; kitchen areas converted to a bedroom, I advised her that with the limited sixty day occupancy, it would be necessary for the management to re-key each unit as it is reassigned to a new family. This would be the only way to insure each new tenant would have a certain sense of security. I recommend the most cost effective way to implement proper key coding for each unit would be to install an electronic locking system. This kind of system allows access to each unit by the use of a pass key computer card. This type of security has been implemented in many hotels due to significant volume of keys that are not turned in by customers. Conversion to this type of system should take place prior to any occupancy. One of these systems is "Vingcard" a computer electronic lock system. The visibility factor is a concern in all multi-family units. Lighting and landscaping requirements will not only improve the security, but will also effectively deter crime. Trimming back trees and shrubbery, supplemented with, high efficiency security lighting will discourage criminal activity. Maintain a minimum of one candlefoot of light in all areas around the buildings, walkways and parking area, and clearly display the address at the main entrance and unit designations on each door. By increasing this visibility factor it allows patrolling officers the ability to monitor actlvity in and around the site. . !l'he Crime Prevention Uni t is available to provide a securi ty survey with. specific recommendations prior to any occupancy. We would also llke to provide training and assistance for the on site management in maintaining a "Neighborhood Watch" atmosphere. I appreciate the opportunity to have input into the planning process. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me anytime at 691-5127. cc: Brookover, SCA .----' (~/ ~ 7:;; -0/ ", . '~~. INTFRDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE DATE: May 19, 1993 ro.: Barbara Reid, Associate Planner, Planning Dept. Brookover,~enior Crime Analyst, Police Dept. FROM: SUBJECT: Barbara South Bay Transition House, 31 Fourth Avenue As a result of your request for police input regarding the potential increase in crime at and around the location of the proposed South Bay Transition House, 31 Fourth Avenue, I spoke with several police supervisors. The general consensus was that the increase in police calls for service,. as a result of this type of housing, will be negligible. There is an expectation that calls for service will increase slightly with any housing development project, and the type of housing, in this particular case, is not an issue. There were a total of 43 documented crime incidents along 00-99 Fourth Avenue during the past six months. The majority of these incidents involved assaults; many were associated with domestic violence. It is anticipated that this type of activity will continue, and perhaps increase slightly. It is also possible that petty thefts at nearby stores will also increase slightly. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me. cc: Merlin Wilson, Acting Investigative Captain .:2/--- 7~ __r~- City of Chula Vista BOARD OF EOUCA TION JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph,D, LARRY CUNNINGHAM SHARON GilES PATRICK A, JUDD GREG Fl SANOOV Al SUPERINTENDENT ..oHN F, VUGRN, Ph,D, CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SLlOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET' CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDNIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH Previously Faxed June 18, 1993 JU~J ,c: :- ~Q,: ~ Mr, Martin Miller Planning Department City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: 31 Fourth Avenue I 15.93.36 14 Unit Apt. Complex Conversion to Homeless Housing Dear Mr. Miller: The District has carefully reviewed the proposed apartment conversion cited above, both with City staff and staff from South Bay Community Services, We believe impacts on Feaster School can be mitigated by the inclusion of the following condition on the project's approval: Children living in the temporary housing will continue to attend their current schools, South Bay Community Services will provide transportation, Any children not currently attending school will be placed in an area school based on space availability and/or special programs or needs, If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, ~s\.~ Kate Shurson Director of Planning & Facilities KS:dp cc: Kathryn Lembo, S, Bay Community Services msw:c:k-Iembo d/-77 ~ )1- -. CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT 84 EAST "J" STREET. ChULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619425-9600 EACH CHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH ICARD OF EDUCA110N JOSEPH 0 CUMMINGS. Ph.D. LARRVCUNNINGHAM May 12, 1993 SHARON GILES PATRICK A. JUDD GREG R. SANDCV AL SUPERINTENDENT JOHN F. VUGRI<. Ph.D. .4f i '. '-..c.; .. . '. i'-l~: ~ " Ms. Barbara Reid Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: 15-93-361 FA-623 1 DP-010 Location: 31 Fourth Avenue Project: 14 Unit Apt. Complex (In existing bldg.) for Homeless Families Dear Ms. Reid Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Initial Study for the 14 Unit Apartment Complex project referenced above. Since it appears no new construction is involved, no school fees are required. Should this situation change, school fees for residential development would be due. The current fee of $2.65/square foot is distributed as follows: $1.17 for Chula Vista Elementary School District, $1.48 for Sweetwater Union High School District. Even though no fees appear to be necessary, the District is still required to sign off on the Certificate of Compliance. Sincerely, ~~L. ':>~~~l" Kate Shurson Director of Planning & Facilities KS:dp cc: South Bay Community Services, Inc. ~~.t:TlOlteSfee 2)-?~ _ 58" ROUTING FORM DATE: May 10, 1993 TO: Ken Larson, Building & Housing John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only) Cliff SWanson, ~ngineering (EIR only) Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only) Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2) Richard Rudolf, Assistant city Attorney (EIR only) Carol Gove, Fire Department Harty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Crime Prevention, Police Department Current Planning Gordon Howard, Advance Planning Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect Bob Leiter, Planning Director Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union B.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR) Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) Other FROM: Barba ra Rei d Environmental section SUBJECT: Application tor Initial Study (15- 93-36IFA-~/DO -010 ) Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-____IFB-____/DO ) Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-____/FB-_IDP) Review of Environmental Review Record FC-____ERR-____) The Project consists of: ~ A Conditional Use Permit to allow transitional or short term housing (up to 60 days) for homeless families in a 14 unit apt. complex. The project will house up to 50 individuals at one time. 31 Fourth Avenue Location: Please review the document and forward to me any comments you bave by 5/14/93 Comments: ~~"'> -r I~'-. ~~ ,.>L:> ~ ((.s. &; .11 .tj"'. cJ) -7( _ ::;9 ~ . j ..~,~. ~~ ~ J 7 J 1"'1"3 -- -. ~4 Yl 9 194. , .' \:'Ie-4..V ~Ru...t., ,.~."~___ -_WQ.<~.ti--~ ~ M ~,,",~_$-&J' ...i""~S+~'. rr.:I~_~~~_ lkl... ",-i 3L~__~:l-1" (1...~u,.____ ___ -4~..~..b;....~.,:,.".,L~-r""'-U~~ h_ -- t,..." .~>>n......... .u..e.J~ _"..If -+1.... cQ; 0.-.1.. ,,~ ~ , u 0_ -r:-^~i.#~_~ 1:..I4--,~H~. ...-IJ.A.~"~-i~~/~l -, -~1-~~.'1_+1" a."&___~ ~ n-....L~~___ ____________ _om ---W~~ .c<lt.L~_~~"..".. . ---~-~~1,-:tJ...W~~.1 a.- - ~.d iJ,.;... tJU.. V....t.... I4.;n - fJe "'f' L...9 h--- ~ . --, .a....--.....I ~ I-L<~ e~ .ft-V AL.: ....."''"'J- ~ ~ --.-c.~.G..,.iL......~~~.,.]-c..~....t.t....... . .&....~.!.Oo~..Irln.~ ~.u____ ----.- -"T..tv...~~fev~~~~ - -. ;oW UJ ~ ~ a-J- -d-.. ~.'i :tJ..Jo- ~ ..L.....-- ~ ~ ft..~..:.~.~..AoI ~~ . . . ...,,",; _H.JI() &~,i,c.u\.k.....O'a----- _. --------- ~-f;:~b (M( .& v.i.ts ,('1 Aif I '/H_ '(.0 '5? ~ f( ," ;J.J-%tJ ( _&D/ ,~ \ " / r- -. May 29, 1993 Ju' ',,",,-, , J {,.l "~..' Planning Commission of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 P:"tr,', . , \1\.., Case No's: PCC-93-39/1S-93-36 In response to your Notice of Proposed mitigated Negative Negative Declaration dated May 26, 1993 on the above case, I would respectfully request that you consider my response to the Planning Department, a copy of which is enclosed, be considered a challenge to this Mitigated Negative Declaration or conditional use permit, as this ill-conceived proposal will surely end up in court and I do not wish to lose any of my constitutional rights because of my ignorance of your ADMINISTRA~IVE PROCEDURES. Everyone of the issues I raised in this enclosed response to the Planning Department should be preserved for me should a positive approval ~s given by whatever Agency approves such silly proposals. Furthermore, the South Bay Community Services, Inc. is in violation of their Conditional Use Permit at 1515 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista. I challenge the Planning Department that they are not heeding the complaints of the next door neighbor, Mr. and Mrs. Leo Wood at 1525 Hilltop Drive, as their conditional use permit provides that neighbors will not disturbed. I wish to preserve my constitutional rights to present evidence of the above violation at 1515 Hilltop Drive, should a Court case develop, as evidence that the South Bay Community Services, Inc. is not capable of handling 8 teen-agers let alone 50 homeless. I wish at this point to enter whatever is necessary to prove my points in court and I do not wish to be limited by you or anyone else. At the hearings to date, each speaker has been limited to 2 or 3 minutes. This length of time is not sufficient to bring to the attention of the Planning Commission the danger to human life, the financial loss on the part of adjacent property owners, thee~cnomic unfeasibility of the proposed project and the unwillingness of the South Bay Community Services, Inc. to allow the community to seek out and find a more suitable location for their transi tional housing. .-- 1.0 I /' ,})->i! .. - 2 - I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the City Council voted funds in the amount of $720,000 at a Council meeting at 1:00 a. m. in the morning. This vote came before the surrounding neighbors were notified of the plans for 31 4th Avenue. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing th~ the City Council, after hearing complaints at a Council meeting about granting $150,000 to the South Bay Community Services for additional expenses in connection witha~q~u~im. 31 4th Avenue, title to be vested in their name, the City Council at the next meeting removed the $150,000 from the South Bay Community Services, Inc. and tacked it on to funds being allocated to the Otay Lighting District, the $150,000 going to South Bay Community Services, Inc. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allo.ed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Nayor and City Council and the Planning Department as well as the South Bay Community Services, Inc. acted ca~ritiously in entering into an agreement to contribute funds for 31 4th Avenue, title to be vested in South Bay Community Services, Inc. without first givin! adjacent property owners the chance to voice their opinions. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that 1 be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that adjacent property owners will be severely damaged should the City Council approve the proposed transitional housing at 31 4th Avenue and that 1 should be luaranteed the legal right to ask for damages from the Chula Vista City Council as well as from South Bay Community Services, Inc. 1 would like to preserve my constitutional rilhts that 1 be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the City of Chula Vista and tbe Planninl Department did not live me sufficient advice and notice, should it be considered that I am in default of any of their administrative rules. I hereby request thar the Planning Department and tbe Chula Vista Planning Commission advise me of my consti- tutional rights to raise ALL OF THE ISSUES which would bring about a NEGATIVE RESPONSE TO THIS PROPOSAL. ly; I am anxious7awaiting and expect to receive written instructions from the person or persons in charge of the ways in which 1 aay brinl up all of the issues - &)/ c2J-'i5~ . - 3 - against this proposal. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in-a Court Hearing that the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista refused my request to build low-rent housing at 21 4th Avwnue, Parcell, Parcel Map l2~. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Chula Vista City Council has voted funds to purchase 17 4th Avenue, Parcel 4, Parcel Map 127, for low rent housing, Hud to pay 60% of the rent. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Chula Vista City Council has voted funds to purchase 31 4th Avenue, Parcel 3, Parcel Map 127, for transitional housing for the homeless. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into ~evidence in a Court Hearing that my constitutional rights have been violated when a public agency, such as the South Bay Community Services, Inc. be given public funds to provide low rent housing when the private sector is denied this right on the very same Parcel Map--side-by-side locations. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that my constitutional rights have been violated when a public agency, with no housing experience, be favored over me, a private sector low-rent housing provider with 40 years of experience in the City of Chula Vista; In the event, at the public hearing each and everyone of these points are not adequately presented to the Planning Department at their Hearing on May 23, 1993. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the passage of a conditional use permit for 31 4th Avenue, Chula Vista, as a short term shelter for the homeless is a dangerous location for the residents therein and against the public interest. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 cc: Hart Klein Bernita Sipan .2/~g3 _~3/ . . . .1a y 12 Application for a cl:>lTlfit.;i:on:al use permit for 31 4th Avenue should be denied because applicant is attempting to use the private property surrounding 31 4th Avenue for her per- sonal use. Applicant is attempting to interject commercial use in an R-4 zone, which is already dangerously overcrowded because when #17, #31 and #45-49 were built the planning department's requirements were one parking space per unit. As you know, your experience has led you to upgrade your requirements to one and one-half to one on all new and up- graded buildings. Lots 7 & 8 of Quartersection 136 were subdivided according to Parcel Mmp 127. 21 4th Avenue is Parcel I, 45-49 is Parcel 2, 31 4th Avenue is Parcel 3 and #17 is Parcel 4. The map mailed out by Doug Reid is incorrect because it does not show the easement which allows access to parcel 2, 3 and 4 to the parking areas behind their buildings. Title to the easement was retained by the owner of 21 4th Ave. #17 has rights of egress and ingress to its parking area, 31 has rights of egress and ingress to its parking area. The rights of 31 4th Avenue end right there. 31 4th Avenue has no right to the turn aroun~provided at 21 4th Avenue or at 47 4th Ave. This is private property and if these two owners do not exercise their legal right to keep all occupants of 31 4th Avenue off their property, then the owners stand a very good chance of being sued for negli- gence in the event of a law suit arising from the operation of a "transitional 60 day time limited housing" at #31 4th. In other words, 31 4th Avenue is landlocked and their parking spaces will be limited to those they can fit into their 100 feet of land. Nothing over and above this. #31 4th Avenue has made no provision for the 2d hammerhead turn-around re- quired by the fire department and other emergency vehicles and it questionable if they have space enough to provide one. In this inadequate space of one parking space per units, the proposed "limited housing" will have to fit delivery trucks bringing in food, they have to fit in at least two sanitainers to service their housing, they will have to provide parking for school buses to load and unload the children, they will have to provide parking for TV trucks, SDG & E trucks and telephone trucks. Since the easement is limited by deed to ingress and egress there can be no parking in the easement. This equipment is for the access of the fire truck and other emergency ))/11 MAY 1 fi "::> -~if/ . . . - 2 - equipment and for the exclusive use of the 42 families who live beyond in a land-locked situation at 45-47-49 4th Avenue. Furthermore more, the pprkiug spaces behind 31 4th Avenue are so narrow that a large van such as a Suburban, a trash truck, a delivery truck a service truck, etc. cannot back out of the parking space into the 20' easement and turn around to head out. These large vehicles will have to back out of their parking space, back out against incoming traffic across the easement behind 17 4th Avenue and will head into a planter strip installed to divide traffic going into and coming out of 21 4th Avenue. Since the planter strip prevents them from turning around, these large vehicles will have to turn the corner and back out to 4th Avenue against the on-coming traffic. When these large vehicles reach 4th Avenue, they have no place to turn around and they will have to back onto 4th Avenue against on-coming traffic in order to turn their vehicle facing the traffic in the right direction. As the owner ofc2l~4th Avenue and the owner of all private driveways onPattel Map 127, I have already faced a similar situation a few years ago when the owner of the 17 4th Avenue building, in attempt to earn a reasonable return on his investment, leased his facilities to a half way house for cancer patients who were receiving drastic diet treatment for the arrest of their cancer. The delivery trucks and ,- the increased traffic for the change from ordinary R-4 activities to a "semi-commercial" (such as the "transitional housing" will be were faced)w~t~ faced with the same situation the applicant will face; tha~ is the delivery trucks could not turn around on my property because I would not let them. The own~r solved the problem by removing all land- scaping in the rear of his building and install a concrete turn-around behind the building so that these trucks could cross over the incoming traffic and reach the out-going traffic lane in order to face in the right direction. The applicant might be able to do something similar if two parking spaces were reserved for large vehicles and a concrete driveway was built between the two buildings so that the large vehicles could pull far enough so that they could back across in the incoming traffic to reach the out-going traffic lane in order to face in the right direction to reach 4th Avenue. ./ ---&~ ./ Of course, the spaces for the~wo sanitainers would :J.. ) - 2"}:J . . - ~ - take two spaces and the concrete turn around would take two spaces in addition would encroach upon the only area the children of the homelss would have to play in the evenings and on week-ends and holidays when they were not cared for by the applicant. The applicant admitted that she would not care for the children at the above times. After all South Bay Community Services, Inc, is an office. They are not care-givers but contract their intended care out to others who do not attempt to give 24 hour care. They tend to be open only during regular school house. The parking situation on 4th Avenue is worse and not better. The City has painted red the curb from the fire plug in front of 17 4th Avenue to the corner of 4th and C Streets. This leaves parking spaces on the curb in front of lots 2, 3, and 4 of Parcel Map 127 which amount to 12 or 13 spaces for the 84 families who now occupy the apartment buildings on the above lots. Since the private parking behind these three buildings is already woefully inadequate, according to current standards of the planning department, the over- flow must park on the street. This is public parking and may not be reserved for anyone of the above parcels--first come; first served. These spaces may be available, or may not be and cannot be counted as parking for the increased use of 31 4th Avenue. When the school buses draw up to load and unload the homeless children, they will have to park in the traffic lane if parking is not available in front of 31 4th Avenue. If the concrete turn-around is build behind 31 4th Avenue, the buses could, of course, pull right up to the building on the concrete pad provided and the children could then board the buses with safety. The problem with this plan is that there then would be absolutely no place for the children to play unless the parents of the children walk them down to the light at the intersection of 4th and C Streets, cross them across the street and stay at the park with them while they play so that they can escort them safely back to the transitional housing. Another alternative which might come to mind is parking spaces might be leased from Land of China . ;2/-~? ~~~~ "0 - :4 - Restaurant. If the homeless just park in the spaces provided by Land of China Restaurant, this busines~ will be faced with the same legal problem which I faced. If parking is permitted and not legally prohibited, then Land of China Restaurant stands to be sued for any occurrence on their property arising from the operation of the transitional house at 31 4th Avenue. That, of course, is up to them. It is possible they will be willing to donate parking to the transitional house. The other alternative would be for the City to donate additional parking to the transitional house at the park across the street. The homeless and their children could safely cross at the traffic light at 4th and C Streets and walk the short distance to their transitional housing. So much for the inadequate parking at 31 4th Avenue. It may be that Mayor Tim Nader is so in favor of this housing that he will work out one of the above solutions to insufficient parking. The other problem is safety. Considering 31 4th Avenue is on a hill and approaching traffic leading north on 4th Avenue is travelling at a high speed because there is no stop light at the corner of 4th and D Streets. This speeding traffic is TOTALLY UNAWARE OF STOPPED SCHOOL BUSES or residents of 31 4th Avenue who might be jaywalking across 4th Avenue in an effort to find a short cut to the park. In the past 10 years, 9 people have been injured in front of 31 4th Avenue, pertaining to the traffic on 4th Avenue. This statistic was provided by the Manager of 31 4th Avenue, who has lived there for 12 years. Currently, there are 2 children living at 31 4th Avenue. In order for the applicant's plan to work, she will be forced to increase the number of children being exposed to these traffic hazards. If there is an accident, then the applicant will be morally and legally responsible, especially in view of this written report reporting all the traffic and parking conditions which exist and will exist upon the approval of this application. There is no access for the handicapped. There is no curb cut in front of 31 4th Avenue. The only accessible one is the one I installed at my driveway leading into 21 4th Avenue. ~&0 ' J /-?7 ~ - 5 - Another issue I would like to bring to your attention is serious overcrowding of the 31 4th Avenue as a transi- tional housing. There is currently two two-bedroom units and 10 one bedroom units. I haven't been provided with a copy of the plan to remodel 31 4th Avenue, but I understand the two bedroom units will be remodeled into kitchen and community areas. Using the standard of safe housing used by apartment builders today, the limit is two people per bedroom plus one. Using arithmetic, 10 one bedroom units would provide sleeping accommodations for two ,,' adults and one child for a total of 30 occupants. The double standard used by the planning department and the city council will allow 50 people in an area that the current standard limits to 30 people. The apartment ownern around 31 4th Avenue conform to the st~ndard but applicant apparently does not plan to conform but will crowd in 20 extra children (persumably) because they will live there for only 60 days. I get a little tired, of this double standard. I am required by the planning department to follow the letter of the law, but all around me are serious infractions on the part of property owners and business owners because they have the favor of the City Council (or whatever reason the infractions are allowed). I hope I have provided you with sufficient irrefutable evidence that the project proposed by applicant has serious and fatal flaws which will lead to a negative recommendation on the part of the Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department. I hope I do not see one more example of favoritism on the part of an agency which should apply the law fair and equally to all applicants. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 420-3869 cc: Mayor and the City Council Hart Klein Bernita Sipan Land of China Rest,aurant ?) _~cY Chula Vista Fire Chief ~ 0 -~~/ . ( ~ B B %0 a: ;:) o '"" ... ~ , . -- - - ,.. - -, ""' - ... ..... ""W!f I I ~..J I ~__..._______OI --I I I I I , , , , , -I , , ,r--T-- ., " , d I I II I I ,I I I , - - - , o II: i .. :: ... G: o Z % ... G: o Z PROJECT LOCATION .- z .. i STREET t" . '. . . .J ," -: :';. ",: ,1'.1 :. . . ) " ~ h:);jj;},r;.: ',' .... ';:., . . . . .",,:::. 'EUCAL TYPTUS PARK " .. 'ge.:;>~;(/.j" . .,. .. L_ .J_ .~',. .I '/~I(::: ~ '.:: : ~ oC .. III ;; ... .. z i t I r ..J ~ !.i I .Fl . lJ=~1 Ud FERI I .-J -.- ~.- __1. .- ~ ] (::ID -...... . I CHULA VISTA PLAJliNING DEPARTMENT (!) APPLICANT: SOUTIIBA' CO~I~IV~ITY PROJECT DESCRIPTION: SERVICES J Short term housing (up to 60 days) for homele~$ ADDRESS 31 t'OIRTII AH"n:d,j/2{ families for up to SO people (Public/Quasi u~e. S C Al E' FILE NUMBER Rtquirts CityCollncil approval) - ~q ~ NORTH '''"' ~OO' PCC - 93 . 39 ~ CREASER & WARWICK, INC. " 345 "F" STREET, SUITE 230 " CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 " (619) 420-3300 May 17, 1993 2/ , Environmental Review Coordinator City of Chula Vista P.O. Box 1087 Chula Vista, CA 92012 RE: 31 Fourth Avenue Gentlemen, We represent the property commonly known as 125 Fourth Avenue, a ninety- six (96) unit apartment development. To allow a "transitional time limit housing" unit in such close proximity would have a significant negative environmental effect on our property especially at such a time in the business cycle as we now face. Our property represents a considerable long term investment in Chula Vista. Any action on the part of the City that threatens the stability of the neighborhood could have serious adverse consequences to the character of the community. Sincerely, CREASER & WARWICK, INC_ ; t..-,,/ .-/ - <--~'-.:. <. ,~~,""""'- ~ '-............... Phil Creaser, President ;2)~/O _ 0 D/ ~ . ~: JI j:purrh IlveIJue, IJ-fjec,1 ~ Ii; 'U3 C;~~~ 21 J - ' ----- ~~.u,b~~~~~db~ ~.t4 ~ ~~ ~ '! 4~ '1e..~ .A~~1 .dv~~~r~~o.~~k~j;~ ~ II ~ 1k ..h"r.I~4/.iN ~ ~ ~I I;' 4/~It: ~. ~~~30~~~"f~ ~1tvtli- ~ .Ahl4u, P4t ~~;:J,~~~ r ~ ~~~7~~ ~~~ ~ Wfl.I, a., ~ .wJ.".,..td- ~ ~ ~ ~IM~~ " ~ ~~ :1i'~D..1S~1..2-~~' ~~.. 'I~wk ~ ~/&44~ tAIw, jJ/ ~ ~ UtI ttu.t, ~ .4"tIM~4/~fMV~~ hlibfr~,~- ~~'~~ , ~~:ka.MCIU-~- , "". . ,. #.. .. ~ 'I ~f:<tUtuvI<<l~~a.uA/., ~:iiIL~ tv. ~ att'I4:.a!&. ~ ~ ~ · to, (1IfiJv A ~ . I ~~), ~ ~ ,. r~~~ '. .l;~!J~:~1 <Av ~- ~ "'-I ,.~~ ~ -r M~lli., I INl 4IMJ ~ /Mt. ~ ~ ~Wt/).J &I. ~~ ~ it; ~A4Ji(:W,!f!:. ~ ~ ~I,~~l ~ ~ ~ Jtu.*U, L ./# ~ J~ ~ UH 4%' IItfAL ~ ~, oIw ~~~"~ktZ4 ~ -r if1vv AtI.44I .z 'UUmL ~ ~ ~? ~ ~~. ENOut?H 15 f.N()U6ifMv.d'w~! cl / -7/ 41/~lftJ - '11 .. , .'SL.. . 11._ ...EI. C ...."".....D. ... .10.... .,C"'" D"'-'~ 0 .O~.t:-G. .,11_0,,0 . .0~D.t-~. .....~ C ....""10.... ""'0"'.. e .I~.O"" .0.,-'.1 .0.'''''.0.... .."".. ....6101.... 'I' e.....lotl. 0'",,' .,e......I!. oJ .....t. aIC"'''_.''' .e.."'!...."" ...",., C..c.t .'''II:,.t- O' woO. . 1.1"""r. ~C,.t-. .0IolC.' McDOKAJ.U. HECHT 8< SoLBERG . ...,....~.....,. INel.loID'NO ...O..C..,O...... CD.-o.....,.'e... ...""0.'....:.... AT .....w .00 wl.8T ..o..c...v 'IOf04Ttol ,."00" ..." 1)1.00. eAuPOal'lA e.,ol "~LI.~MO"'E ,..el .~..~.... "a..ECO.I"" Ie,.) .a...... r ..." ".~ _ - . .. .' ,,' ......... .......'....10 C........o.. ,. '" 2i1 I',.'., i. -._- . :......./. --..,- r.:_ May 21, 1993 VIA D881NGI:R Mr. Douglas D. Reid Environmental Review Coordinator City ot Chula vista Post Offiee Box 10B7 Chula Vista, California 92012 Re: 'outh .ay COmDunity service. Application for Conditional U.e .ermit, Environmental aevie. Initial .tu4y, 31 Fourth Avenue Dear Mr. Reid: On behal f ot our client, Mr. Hart Klein, the owner of properties located at 45, 47 and 49 Fourth Avenue in the city of Chula Vista, we submit to you this letter in re.ponse to the above- refereneed Initial study ("IS"). As you can see frOm the cOm1l\ents found herein, we bel ieve the proposed Conditional U.e Permit ("CUP") for "Transitional Housing" requires an Environm.ntal Impact Report ("EII\") pur.uant to the california Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guideline.. lP&C'l'8 There are presently fourteen (14) existing dwelling units ("OOs") on the subject property located at 31 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, california. As we understand the application, the existing fourteen (14) I)U. will be red..ic;ned to accollllllOdate fifty (50) beds. One of the DU. will be utilized by an on-aite ..nager and one DO will .erve as a kitchen for the total fourteen (14) DUB. Theretore, the fifty (50) beds will need to be distributed in the remaining twelve (12) DUs. It i. obvious that this proposal will greatly iner.... the intensity of use for the 31 Fourth Av.nue .....I'\"".......u c2 / --92 __'7/--/ a Mr. Douglas D. Reid May 21, 1993 Page 2 We are informed by our client that the proposed project, along with a total of approximately one hundred six (106) DUs, will take access by a very narrow alley. We are also informed that this particular section of Fourth Avenue is heavily travelled and has a recent history of a number of traffic related accidents. This could be caused, in large: part, by the increased commercial development that has occurred in the immediate vicinity of the 31 Fourth Avenue property (e.g. Target and Petco). The property is also situated in close proximity to an on and off ramp for state Route 54. ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES TO BE ADDRESSED Based on the facts, as outlined hereinabove, it would appear that an EIR should address, at the very least, the issues of traffic, parking, noise, air quality and the combined issues of the pUblic's health and safety. A thorough discussion of these and other potential significant environmental impacts, and the required mitigation thereof, of the CUP will afford the general public an opportunity to fully understand the project. An opportunity that CEQA and its Guidelines are designed to guarantee. We thank you for an opportunity to take part in the IS. Please send us a copy of the City'S Notice of Preparation and/or any other pertinent City documents relating to the proposed CUP. sincerely, Paul E. Robinson, A.P.C. McDONALD, BECHT , SOLBERG PER/bar cc: Mr. Hart Klein ..2 ) ~93 ~1~/ PLANNING COMMISSION:MINUTES AND RESOLUTION 02 J -9 i Excerot from Unofficial Plannim!: Commission Minutes of 6/23/93 ITEM I: PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-39; REQUEST TO ESTABLISH SHORT-TERM TRANSITIONAL HOUSING FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES UP TO 44 PEOPLE AT 31 FOURTH AVENUE - South Bay Community Services Associate Planner Miller presented the staff report. Staff recommended Commission approval of the proposal in accordance with the draft City Council resolution with the exception of finding no. 4, which should read as follows: "The conditional approval of PCC-93-39 complies with the regulations and conditions of the Municipal Code, and that the project is conditioned to comply with the requirements of all applicable City departments, will not generate excessive traffic, and provides adequate off-street parking in accordance with Planning Commission determination pursuant to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Section 19.54.050. The Planning Commission further finds that this is a quasi-public use and not enumerated in Section 19.62 and, therefore, based on staff analysis, 18 parking spaces is an appropriate amount of parking for this facility. Mr. Miller noted, also, that condition no. 4 had been refined to read "Transport all school-age children to their current school of attendance. In the event the child must attend a school within the Chula Vista Elementary School District, said child shall attend the school determined by the District based on space availability." These changes were made at the request of the Chula Vista Elementary School District. Mr. Miller restated staff's recommendation that the Planning Commission find that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-36; and adopt Resolution PCC-93-39 recommending that the City Council approve Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-39, based on the revised findings and subject to the revised conditions contained in the Draft City Council resolution. Commissioner Carson asked about the overall increase in the number of residents in the complex. She noted that the Resource Conservation Commission minutes reflected a concern regarding the existing population being at 34 and increasing to 44. Commissioner Carson asked staff's rationale for increasing to 44. Mr. Miller said the existing population in this facility was 34, which may include single people or couples with no children. The project emphasis was on family units and, therefore, there would be an anticipated minimal increase in the number of children. That was the purpose of Condition #4. Commissioner Carson asked if the money allocated in the budget was for this specific location; it had been implied by some of the letters received that the City Council had already made up its mind regarding this project. Mr. Miller said he had been informed that the funds were contingent upon the conditional use permit being approved. Housing Coordinator Arroyo of the Community Development Department stated that the funding which had been identified as a source of funding from the Federal Government could be used c1/-75 - '7t / for these types of projects contingent upon approval by the Planning Commission of the conditional use permit and approval by the City Council. The funding for this particular project could be from a combination of sources. Commissioner Carson questioned the timeframe the families would have for daily counselling to take place before school or work and if there would be a previous counselling time. She also felt the timeframe was too short for training; could a person who had previously had fInancial problems change their habits in how to deal with money and be able to go to an apartment. Mr. Miller deferred to South Bay Community Services for reply during the public hearing. Commissioner Martin asked how they could be assured that these would be families instead of single people. Mr. Miller said South Bay Community Services would screen each family unit; the defInition of "family" was a legal term and staff had not approached that term because of the controversy surrounding it. Commissioner Martin questioned whether there was any monitoring by the City. Mr. Miller said the conditional use permit application would have to be amended if housing for singles was to be set up. This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. Kathryn Lembo, Executive Director, South Bay Community Services, 315 Fourth Avenue, CV, asked those present in support of the project to stand. One-half to three-fourths of the audience stood. Ms. Lembo proceeded to give the fIrm's qualifications and experience. Regarding the definition of families, they were defined as people with children under 18 years of age; they may be single-parent families either male or female; some may be dual-parent families. Regarding the amount of time, Casa Nuestra had a 90% success rate either returning the young people to their original home or successfully having them go out on their own. The 60-day timeframe was based on research of other types of facilities nationwide. If a family may need an additional week or two, that would be supplied. The screening would include drug and alcohol testing if they had any doubt about their use. If the applicants did not want to take it, they would not be able to move in. The goals and objectives are reached in discussion with the family's case manager during sessions; then each day the family as a unit would discuss them at breakfast for that day. -2- )J~9 ? ,,- , 1~" Regarding complaints against Casa Nuestra, Ms. Lembo said there was one neighbor who was still opposed. There were eight other neighbors who had signed the petition in support of this project and had come before the Council at the one-year review of Casa Nuestra in support. Dan Marcus, 315 Fourth Ave., CV, representing South Bay Community Services, said there were over 1,000 homeless individuals nightly in the South Bay, the majority of which were families. There were only eight beds for the homeless in South Bay. He supported the project. Anita Landrum said she lived in the area of 31 Fourth Avenue, but preferred not to give her address. She was under the impression that the petition she had signed was for drunken bums, junkies, etc. who would be living close to her and she did not want them near her child or near her home or downtown. She had found it was for a good use, and she supported the project. Anne Wilson, 450 B Street, Suite 1010, San Diego, Program Director for San Diego LISC Program, spoke in support of the project as a lender. She said LISC was a local San Diego County source of working capital and investment capital for non-profit organizations trying to fmd solutions to the problems with housing that confront lower income families in the County's communities. Private corporate donations from corporations and banks and low interest loans were used to provide funds. LISC had provided South Bay Community Services with $10,000 in working capital on their other Fourth Street development, which was a longer term transitional housing program, and also had voted a commitment of $200,OOO--a five-year loan to help the City of Chula Vista make contributions over five years to this development. In underwriting South Bay Community Services, they had found them very strong. Mary Nicolas, 17 Fourth Ave., #A, CV, said she worked at the Civil Department of South Bay Court, supported the project. Violeta Ochoa, 207 Sandstone St., CV, urged support of the project. She at one time had been a homeless mother with four children, but there had been a program they could go to. Directing her comments to Commissioner Carson, Ms. Ochoa said she had been in the program four weeks, was now a counselor at South Bay Community Services, two of her children were in college, and the other two were on their way to college. The goals could be reached with help. Brad Wilson, 626 Arthur Ave., CV, a Board Member of South Bay Community Services, supported the project. Pam Smith, 380 Third Ave., CV, District Manager of the Social Security Administrator and Chair of the Chula Vista Human Services Council, spoke in support of the housing project, both professionally and personally. -3- d)-;7 ~ 1& . Cheryl Cox, 647 Windsor Circle, CV, of the Chula Vista Elementary School District said the School District had written a grant through McKinney to assist children with academic delays, as well as social and emotional needs. They did not know if it had been funded. She urged support of the project and pledged the cooperation of the Chula Vista Elementary School District in providing academic, emotional, and social services for those children. Cannen Martinez, 1225 Broadway, CV, said South Bay Community Services had been there for her and helped her to go to school and to get a job. She supported the project. Len Walton, 3123 Casa Bonita Drive, Bonita, served on the Advisory Committee for South Bay Community Services, and had volunteered at Casa Nuestra. He expressed the need for the homeless project and urged approval. Bernita Sipan, 335 Kimball Terrace, CV, opposed - primarily R-l residential, many seniors residing in area, setting a precedent, crime increase, illegals; who would give proper training? are jobs available? counseling?; waste of taxpayer money, don't need facilities, could use vacant apartments, charitable organizations to help. Hart Klein/Barbara Klein, 11070 Caminito Vista Pacifica, SD 92131- opposed - family trust adjacent to the subject site deferred to Paul Robinson. Paul Robinson, 600 W. Broadway, SD, representing Hart and Barbara Klein - opposed - project fast tracked; presented a letter suggesting flaws in the environmental process regarding traffic, schools, drainage, and alternative sites. Frank Sipan, 335 Kimball Terrace, CV - opposed - property value, equal protection, look at other 31 sites and find site with less impact on residential character of the neighborhood, use the money for a better site where there could be more aparttnents for the same amount of money. Allen L. King, 601 Myra Avenue, CV, Vice Chair of the C.V. Housing Commission, stated that the Chair of the Commission had asked him to represent the Commission in opposition of the project. Two years previously the Commission had recommended that the Council not go forward with a project near the same area because it was too much money; on February 24, this project was before their Commission and they felt the price for the property was exorbitant to help so few people. They were unanimously in favor of helping, but not with this project, not at this price, and not at this site. The Council had totally disregarded the Commission's recommendation. Associate Planner Miller pointed out that the issue being considered dealt with land use compatibility. The question of [mancial appropriateness or inappropriateness for the project had been considered by the Redevelopment Agency at previous meetings. -4- c2//9tr /'71\~ Ruth Piazzoni, 135 Fourth Ave., #5, CV, representing Chula Vista Townhouse Association, opposed - too expensive for a few; not the kind of people needed in such a dense population of seniors; need a home but not in their area; downgrading senior neighborhood. Robert Frazer, 321 "D" St., CV - opposed - represents second social service facility within one block of his horne, fourth facility within two blocks; adjustment for neighborhood; trespassing, noise, and other problems related to other facility located next door to him; placement of facilities should be spread throughout City in fair manner. Regina Hickey, 21 Fourth Ave., CV - opposed - violation of conditional use permit at 1515 Hilltop Drive; suggested alternate plan of setting up citizens committee to provide for the 43 people; economically unfeasible; suggested integration of homeless families into existing apartments using the neighbors as role model; offered 13 of her apartments at 21 Fourth Avenue to house the people covered by this proposal at a rental rate of $450/mo. for as long as the apartments were needed. Barbara Orsa, co-owner of 21 Fourth Ave., CV - opposed - economically unfeasible; in conflict with President's budget cuts. Karla Orsa, co-owner of 21 Fourth Ave., CV - opposed - budget deficit, unemployed workers, housing families in available rentals, freedom and opportunity for future generations. Erica Orsa, co-owner of21 Fourth Ave., CV - opposed - urged change in zoning laws, equal treatment of property, use of available rentals. Terry W. Keith, 67 Fourth Ave. #H, CV - opposed - hidden agenda by SBCS in obtaining property to qualify for more grant money to help support administrative costs of their agency; not enough funds for security of the area and Eucalyptus Park; suggested as a condition that the patrol area for the C.V. Police Dept. be extended down to "C" Street; undocumented aliens to reside in properties in order to have legal address to collect various government subsidies in order to exist; promotion of driving without insurance? questioned training in eight weeks in order to make enough money to afford a $400 or $450 apartment; questioned compliance with ADA rules by cutting down shrubbery and adding lighting. Rick Alcorta, 47 Fourth Ave., #L, CV - opposed - said he had circulated the petition and had not misinterpret the intentions of SBCS; is Manager of Park Vista Apartment located at 45, 47, 49 Fourth A venue next door to the proposed site of the homeless shelter; on behalf of the residents of Park Vista Apartments requested that the CUP be denied because of the expense and unfeasible location; vacancies would occur in his apartments if this shelter were approved; unfair to relocate tenants at 31 Fourth A venue; rotation of families would create traffic and confusion as to who should actually be at the proposed site; increased number of children; traffic accidents. -5- ;J / - ~7 _/)~ r Marcella Gomez, 135 Guava Ave., CV, representing several seniors who could not be present - opposed - area not well situated for homeless family center; area in jeopardy of becoming a homeless community without the center; noted areas homeless were already using; other alternatives could be pursued; use the funds to spread throughout community; use another center to conduct meetings; National City willing to contribute--why can't National City pursue their own center; ample for families to attend in San Diego; why can't Chula Vista transfer money to facilities which already exist; not enough resources for police to patrol the center; no background checks. Judith Pogue, 115 Landis Ave., CV - opposed - predominantly single-family homes; setting precedent; much opposition from the neighbors; SBCS had not approached the neighbors regarding their feelings about the project; provides no benefit to neighborhood. Barbara Phillips, Chula Vista Mobilehome Court, 8 Via Nomentana, CV, a senior citizens mobilehome park - opposed - not a proper place to put homeless shelter; price too high for not enough people. Joan B. Perry, 521 Orange Ave., CV, owner of a mobilehome in the Chula Vista Mobilehome Court - opposed - inappropriate neighborhood; thoughtless to put in high density senior area; dangerous for seniors to walk; need peace and quiet. Emerald Randolph, 2856 Echo Valley Rd., Jamul, said she was Director of the Temporary Restraining Order Clinic in San Diego. She had worked with the School District as Director of Student Welfare and Attendance and had suggested help for the homeless families to Kathy Limbo. The School District checks for residency verification. She said there was a wrong connotation of "homeless." Spoke in support. Martino Mazon, 31 Fourth Ave., CV - opposed - did not know she would have to move until she saw it in the paper; next morning found homeless in front yard and graffiti on walls; tenants were like a family; bad location; pick a place where people are not forced out of their homes; would rather pay taxes to build a new facility. Margaret Varante (did not give address, but said she lived in a mobilehome park in San Diego) - supported - was disappointed that person with 13 vacancies wanted to fill them; someone else owning four lots that had been turned down on a building permit was at the hearing to take it out on people that did not deserve it; the two issues should be addressed the way staff recommended it. Randy Pogue, 115 Landis Ave., CV - opposed - asked those who had stood in favor before to stand again if they owned property in the area being proposed. A few stood, but it was noted that some with children had already left the meeting. -6- .J.j ~ / tJO -1q- Steven Norton, 129 Guava Ave., CV - opposed - felt it would be better for the homeless to live in an area among others who were not homeless. To be with others in the same condition reinforced the condition. Dan Dennison, 659 Jefferson Ave., CV - supported - voted for it in the Mayor's task force; said it needed to be done; talk was cheap; it took money to take care of it; the benefits would outweigh the problems; families would be together. Michael Ochoa, 207 Sandstone, CV - supported - asked how Chula Vista could be made worse when they would be taking people off the street; how could a price be put on help for the community; it would not make Chula Vista a better place by keeping homeless on the street; he said he was the son of Mrs. Ochoa who had spoken earlier and had been homeless; when their family could not take care of them, a shelter provided for them. The following submitted speaker slips in support, but did not speak: Shirley & Bill Bettencourt, Bonita 91902; Sue & Steve Wavra, 5866 Whirlybird Way, Bonita 91902-representing C.V. Presbyterian Church; Judith Johnson, 3656 Louisiana St., SD 92104; Raul Martinez, 3656 Louisiana St. SD 92104; Elizabeth Iniguez, 489 D St. #I, CV 91910; Rev. Dr. Alan Wyneken, 355 Canyon Ridge Dr., Bonita 91902-representing Pilgrim Lutheran Church, CV; Ranie Hunter, 1910 Rue Michelle, CV 91913; Claudio Balestra, 314 Park Way, CV 9191O-representing Episcopal Community Services; Sharon Cewazos, 566 Park Way, CV 91910; Charles L. Pugsley, 3702 Wild Oats Ln, Bonita 91902; Tammy Franklin, 174 Tremont, CV 91911; Lydia Mojean, 329 Topaz Ct., CV 901911; Stymie Ohlson, 2414 Palermo Dr., SD 92106; Maria Martinez, 1225 Broadway, Apt 412, CV 91911; Estela Lemos, 76 Oaklawn, CV 91910; Steven Wood, 6783 Alvarado Rd, #1, SD 92120; Eddie Perez, 3228 Glen Abbey Blvd., CV 91910; Edward Penoz, 76 Oaklawn Ave., CV 91910; Rick Newmyer, 6733 Paris Way, CV; Patty Gorman, 578 Vance St., CV 91910; Bill Molina, 1088 Sage View, CV; Nancy Gorman 580 Vance St., CV 91910; Janet Parnell, 246-A Rancho Drive; CV; Denise Hilbert, 246-A Rancho Dr., CV; Carlos Amaya (no address); Tamera Myers (no address); Zerjesus Ries, 1515 Hilltop Dr., CV 91911; Jonathan Barber, 778 Elder Ave., CV 91911; Leslie J. Gonzalez, 1019 River Ash Dr., CV 91910; Chris Carter, 4871 Voltaire St., SD 92127; Jose and Martha Torres, 3618 Del Sol, SD 92154; Eddie Lemos, 76 Oaklawn, CV 91910; John Shepard, 846 La Senda, CV 91910; Denielle Acuna, 415 Colorado, CV 91910; Luis Bello, 85 Oaklawn, #D, CV 91910; Alex Lemos, 76 Oaklawn, CV 91910; Mario Herrera, 436 Colorado St., Apt. C; CV 91910; George Trevino, 512 Casselman, CV 91910; Jo Castaneda, 321 CSt., CV 91910; Ray-Etta Morrell, 116 Palomar St., CV 91911; Paul Perez, 307 Orange Ave., CV 91911; Hector Morales, 4335 Hilltop Dr., Apt. I, CV 91911; Jose Luis Mendoza, 3120 Imperial Ave., SD; Anthony A. Ramirez, 2035 Oceanview Blvd., SD; Keith Diffenderffer, 321 CSt., CV 91910; Laurie Schmidt, 1148 Third Ave., Sp. 115, CV 91911; Martha Limon, 485 Emerson St., CV 91911; Teresa Limon, 485 Emerson St., CV 91911; Joe Espinoza, 443 Woodlawn, #D, CV 91910; Jose Trevino, 512 Casselman St., CV 91910; Guillermo Trevino, 509 Casselman St., -7- )/ -)0 I <iO' ...-- CV 91910; Robert Lally, 299 17th St., SD; Brad Wilson, 626 Arthur Ave., CV 91910; Maple Henyan, 1260 Second Ave., CV 91911; Un Walton, 3123 Casa Bonita, Bonita 91912; Mary Granelle; 90 Connoley Cr., CV 91910; Dan Dennison, 659 Jefferson Ave., CV 91910; Rhoda Taylor, 470 Moss St., CV 91911; Robert M. Miller, 501 "H" St., CV 91910; Jacqueline J. Jones, 501 "H" St., CV 91910; Cheryl Siega, 315 Fourth Ave., Suite E, CV 91910; Alice Shepard; 846 La Senda, CV 91910; James Whitfield, 6630 Hedges Way, SD 92139; Robert Etherington, 876 Hazy Glen Ct., CV 91910; Pauline H. Channell, 1458 Max Ave., CV 91911; M. K. Dennison, 659 Jefferson St., CV 91910; Annie H. Matheny, 1261 Second Ave., CV 91911; Tarnra Heaps, 152 Sierra Way, CV 91911; Norman Knight, 1773 Broadway, CV 91911; Earl Biggers, 6776 #26, CV 91910; Gene Merlino, 1470 Seacoast Dr., #B, IB 91932; Michael W. Grady, 251-A Rancho Dr., CV 91911; Mary Case, 5972 Arboles St., SD 92120; Oshyrsol Salazar, 1459 Sequena St., (no city named); David L. Sheldon, 13712 Jamul Dr., Jamul; Lorenzo Higley, 450 B St., SD 92110; Elodia C. Gonzales; 2970 Coronado Ave., Sp. 38, SD 92154; Roxanne Morgan (homeless); John Iciak, 1193 Third Ave., CV 91911; Douglas and Stephanie Lewis, 6059 Rancho Mission Rd., #202, SD 92108; Tom Saxton, 1195 Third St., CV 91911; Sherry Pehis, 575 James St., #A, CV 91910; Carmen Martinez, 1225 Broadway, #412, CV 91911; Bethany Porter, 450 B St., SD 92101; Amy Perkins, 4040-84 Porte la Paz, SD 92122; Nanci Weiss, 2615 Congress St., SD 92110 No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Chair Fuller declared a break at 9:25 p.m.; the meeting reconvened at 9:32 p.m. Chair Fuller emphasized that the items for consideration were the recommendations of staff, not previous action by Council or any of the fmancial ramifications of the program. It was simply whether or not the Commission agreed that the project had no environmental impacts, and adopt the Negative Declaration, and also to find whether the Commission agreed or disagreed with the issuance of a conditional use permit for the property. Commissioner Martin asked if there was a conflict of information from the schools. Associate Planner Miller replied that at one point the School District had been informed that there were 44 children residing at this particular facility. That had since been explained that there would be 44 people, one of which would be a resident manager, with the remainder being tenant family groups. The maximum number of children would be 30. As a result of consultations, it was decided to include the condition regarding transporting the children to their current school of residence, and that if a child needed to be assigned to a school, the School District would assign that child based on availability of a school, and that child would also be transported by South Bay Community Services to the assigned school. Chair Fuller also asked staff to respond to questions by the Attorney, Mr. Paul Robinson, regarding drainage and the need to widen Fourth A venue at that location. -8- }J/){);L, -~I- Mr. Miller said that the requirement from the Engineering Department on the dedication of right-of-way was included when the project was proposed at 50 residents; the project was redefmed for 43 tenants, the circumstances changed, and it was determined that there was not a nexus between the requirement and the project as proposed. On June 11, Senior Civil Engineer Ullrich wrote a note to Planning staff that the reduction in work would not allow for the requirement to install public improvements under the Code. Also, because the City was involved with the project from a financial standpoint, this would be negotiated with the applicant as a part of an agreement with them for the funds. For the purpose of the conditional use permit, it could not be required. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf stated that the original project was proposed to have 50 people, but also called for substantial construction with extensive construction costs which would trigger a Municipal Code requirement for the dedication. The project was reconfigured to eliminate that, so there was no legal basis for the extraction. It was never an environmental issue; it was only a Code requirement issue. It was his opinion that it was adequately addressed in the Negative Declaration. Regarding environmental issues, Associate Planner Reid said the School Districts were satisfied that there were no environmental impact as a result of the project. The Traffic Engineer reviewed the particular proposal and did not recommend that a traffic study would be needed; regarding access and traffic figures, it met the City's threshold standards and there were no problems indicated which would need to be addressed. Regarding the date of May 17, 1993, on the cover of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, this was the date the draft Mitigated Declaration was written, although it was not posted at the County until May 24. There was adequate time for the receipt of comments by the public, as well as the other departments. Changes in the project description had been made in response to comments to the proposed Negative Declaration. Those changes had been incorporated into the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Ms. Reid said the original Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted as a Mitigated Negative Declaration because there was a potential substantial effect on drainage. Upon follow-up to determine what was the potential, Engineering determined it was not substantial and set forth in the addendum the particulars of that and the way it could be dealt with. The drainage was a pre-existing problem; it was not as a result of this project and was not seen as a potentially significant impact after further analysis. Regarding why alternatives were not dealt with in the Negative Declaration, CEQA requires alternatives in an ErR and not in a Negative Declaration. Also, in processing the Negative Declaration, there was not substantial evidence presented to require an environmental impact report. -9- <6?-" :2./ -JtJ 3 Associate Planner Miller specified that the drainage problem was addressed in the Conditional Use Permit because it posed a safety problem. Therefore, the applicant was conditioned to address the problem to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, whether that be putting in drainage pipes, lowering the soil in the flower beds, or a combination thereof, or some other solution. It was up to the study that would be prepared as a result of any approval, and then the approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Mr. Miller referred to the comments made regarding Casa Nuestra. He said that on June 10 the project had been reviewed as a requirement of the original conditional use permit on a yearly basis. The notices were sent out to the area residents, including the Woods, and no responses or objections were received. The extension was granted on that particular project. Commissioner Ray asked why a conditional use permit was being considered, since it was going to house people for an extended period of time, although it was transitory. Why was a conditional use permit required for an existing apartment building to be used as apartments? Mr. Miller replied that it was because of the quasi-public nature of the project. South Bay Community Services was a private non-profit organization, but they were doing quasi-public work in the screening process. As a quasi-public use, it would be required. Commissioner Ray asked if SBCS purchased the facility through other means and not involve the City, could they buy the property and then lease it to the same people for a period of 60 days and not have to go through City approval.? Mr. Miller answered that the financial aspect was beyond the purview of the Conditional Use Permit and was not addressed. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf concluded that Mr. Ray was asking if there were private funding and no governmental funding, and the organization bought the property and then rented it at market rate. Mr. Rudolf said that on a quasi-public use was where a social purpose is being served at providing housing at a less-than-market rate for a social good, it becomes a quasi- public use which triggers Chapter 19.54. If it was market rate, they would be like any other property owner renting property and there was no quasi-public use. Commissioner Ray asked if other landowners chose to rent them through an ad in the newspaper for a lower price, would that fall under the same statute. Mr. Rudolf said in his opinion it would. Providing subsidized housing at a lower-than-market rate would be a quasi-public use and they would have to go through this process and receive a conditional use permit. Commissioner Carson asked if there was a review period on the Conditional Use Permit for review. She proposed that there be a review at the end of two years, similar to 1515 Hilltop Drive. Mr. Miller answered that it could be easily incorporated into the conditions of approval. -10- )/--/tJ1 <63--- .- Commissioner Tarantino asked if the tenants who would have to move out would be assisted in any way in terms of fmding another place to live. At the request of Mr. Miller, Mr. Marcus of South Bay Community Services, said that each tenant had been notified approximately two months before. He had met with the residents, and would help them fmd another apartment and help pay for moving expenses and other incidental costs. If an equitable apartment at the same rate could not be found, they would help to pay for an equitable apartment which might cost $15 to $20 more in that neighborhood. With all the vacancies in the area, they would like to find them apartments where they could keep the relationships with the other tenants. Commissioner Martin questioned the monitoring system; had there been reported events regarding the other home nearby? If so, what assurances were there that that kind of activity was unacceptable. Mr. Miller answered that staff was not aware of the alleged problems with the other facility. He pointed out that the other facility was permitted through the State and that the City by State law had no jurisdiction over that; no conditional use permit was required at that facility. He noted, also, that the facilities differ greatly in the clientele they would serve. Commissioner Martin said this was an outstanding program; the facility had to be done well and monitored closely; there should be someone the citizens could contact if there were problems. Assistant Planning Director Lee noted that regarding the project on "D" Street, the City was superseded by the State who authorizes certain facilities on a limited basis. The State was the monitoring program for that facility. The program on Hilltop Drive was set up for review by the City and there was no direct monitoring otherwise. At the request of the Commission, Kathryn Lembo of SBCS said there would be a full-time resident manager on site who would not be allowed to have another job. He would be paid for being there on a full-time basis; Mr. Marcus at the SBCS office would be the next person to contact; she would be next to contact. In addition to the conditional use permit, they would have a development agreement with the Community Development Departments of both National City and Chula Vista because they would provide the funding. In that development agreement, there would be even more conditions dealing with issues other than land use. At the request of Commissioner Moot, Mr. Miller explained how a conditional use permit review would work for those present; how the notices would be sent out; and the consequences of rmding that it should be revoked. Principal Planner Griffin stated that the process which had been used for Casa Nuestra, which was South Bay Community Service's facility on Hilltop for runaway teenage women, was the -11- 02/ -)()5 -~tf-/ zoning administrator process after an initial review by the Council. The notice was sent out asking the neighbors for input on any problems; it was very specific; staff wants them to report any problems to them; there had been a few problems in the beginning based on staffing; the problems had been immediately addressed by changing some staff, tightening some rules, and the problems cleared up right away. On the next review period, there had been only a couple of remaining problems from the one neighbor; at the last review period there had been no comments from the neighbors. He suggested that the Commission could use the same process. If problems could not be corrected, the permit would be returned to the Commission and Council for consideration of additional conditions or revocation. Chair Fuller noted that those opportunities for review through a conditional use permit afforded a property owner or any resident living in an area where there were high density apartments more opportunity to seek help with problems in the neighborhood. Barbara Orsa asked from the audience who would own the property--the City of Chula Vista or the South Bay Community Services. Mr. Miller said South Bay Community Services would continue to own the property if they were required to cease and desist. The ownership had nothing to do with a revocation of the conditional use permit. They would be the property owners, and they could rent it out at market value, if they so chose, or sell it. Commissioner Ray asked if they were a quasi-public agency, why wouldn't the City still retain some rights as to what was to be done with the property and the City was putting up some of the money and the City was issuing the conditional use permit. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf said that Mr. Miller's answer was correct; however, there would be an agreement between SBCS and the Redevelopment Agency with many other conditions included, and it was possible that there would be conditions in that agreement with regard to fmancing that in the event they conduct the project in such a manner that they lose their conditional use permit, that something might happen to ownership. There could be a right of revert. Mr. Arroyo of Community Development commented that if the property were to revert back and they violated one of the conditions, one of the conditions being considered is that the funds that were initially allocated would have to be repaid to the City if the use of the property were to change significantly. Commissioner Ray asked what would happen if the property were sold outright; would money come back to the City? -12- ;2/ - )tJlj ~ ~~/ Mr. Arroyo said that would be an important point and would be taken into account in the development agreement with the Agency. Referring to Condition No.7, Commissioner Carson asked for wording for the review of the conditional use permit. Mr. Miller said item no. 7 was boilerplate wording and said that if the applicant did not take advantage of the conditional use permit within one year, it becomes null and void. A new Condition #8 could deal with the length of time for a review period. Commissioner Moot asked if a similar review period and program as the Casa Nuestra, what would that language be if they Commission wanted to add that as a condition of the Conditional Use Permit. Mr. Rudolf suggested that if the Commission desired, that they pass a motion with language similar to that, staff would locate it and include it. He noted that this process of having built in as a condition of a conditional use permit a periodic review was something that had historically been done before the Code was amended to put in clear, cogent provisions regarding to revocation of conditional use permits. He suggested that it was no longer necessary; there now was a clear process in the Code for processing revocation of a conditional use permit if a condition was thought to be violated. He did not feel it was necessary to include it. Commissioner Carson felt people are very tolerant and do not want to be the first person to report a problem. She would like to see the wording there, so the residents in the area would know they had that recourse. Mr. Rudolf suggested that a certain period and clarify who would be the reviewer--whether it would be an administrative review by staff alone, Zoning Administrator, or by the Planning Commission itself in a public hearing setting. Principal Planner Griffin stated that he could suggest some language which was used in Casa Nuestra. At the request of the Commission, he suggested the following: "This Conditional Use Permit shall expire on _ (date), subject to review and extension by the Zoning Administrator. Notice shall be given to all property owners within 500 feet, plus any residents that submitted letters or spoke at the hearing this evening. The decision of the Zoning Administrator may be appealed to the Planning Commission. " Commissioner Tuchscher asked for clarification as to whether it would be an annual review or review period after one year and then no more. -13- ~/ ~ /07 -~/p/ Commissioner Carson said that her intent was to review it annually for two years, and if there were no complaints, there would be no review. Commissioner Tuchscher suggested that it be administrative, rather than public hearing initially, and asked about deleting the words "shall expire on." Mr. Griffm said the City Attorney was suggesting, also, since it would be a review rather than expiration, that the language be deleted. MSUC (Carson/Tuchscher) 7-0 to find that this project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration on I.S. 93-36 and the Addendum thereto. MS (Carson/Ray) to adopt Resolution PCC-93-39 recommending that the City Council approve PCC-93-39 based on the fmdings and subject to the conditions contained in the attached draft City Council resolution with corrections to Finding #4, Condition #4, and the addition of Condition #8, as revised. Commissioner Ray, referring to item 2 of the resolution, was concerned that the facility would house not only Chula Vista homeless, but also National City and surrounding South Bay communities. He asked if the resolution, questions and responses were not geared toward Chula Vista zoning for Chula Vista purposes. Mr. Rudolf replied that the finding was that the general well being of the neighborhood or the community be satisfied, with a broader finding that it would be of the general well being of the entire South Bay. It could be rewritten to make it more narrow if the Commission desired. Commissioner Ray did not believe the Commission would concur, but he felt it was too broad. He was more concerned with Chula Vista than with the impact of his decision on National City or another community which may be neighboring. He was concerned that National City homeless would be in the facility and Chula Vista homeless still in the park. Mr. Rudolf was comfortable that the fmding was defensible and met the requirement, and was prepared to argue to a court that by having the people in this facility, it was good for the general welfare of the neighborhood and the community in the immediate surrounding area, as well as all of the City of Chula Vista and South Bay. Commissioner Martin asked if would be possible to say that Chula Vista had priority. Chair Fuller said that was not a condition, but had been proposed by SBCS. Commissioner Moot clarified that there would be a yearly review, as Condition #8, by the Zoning Administrator, and if after two consecutive yearly reviews no problems were noted, the procedures would revert to the Code for any revocation thereafter. -14- ~/~/c1~ _~fJ/ Mr. Rudolf said that the condition would not include any provision for an automatic revocation or expiration, just calling for a public hearing by the Zoning Administrator to review it. Commissioner Ray applauded Ms. Ochoa for her accomplishments. He felt it was outstanding that she and her family had faced some hardships and had come out of it quite well. Her son also did a fine job in his comments. He was taken aback by comments of some of the other speakers. He noted that background checks and previous criminal activities of tenants were not checked for anybody renting an apartment; he tended to agree with Mr. Frazier and Mr. Sipan that this was not money well spent because he felt there were other facilities where public funds could be better used. He would vote against it based on fiscal issues attached; however, the Commission could only vote on the zoning. He would vote for the project because it was a worthwhile endeavor. He applauded those who were in attendance earlier who had used South Bay Community Services 'and had shown that non-profit organizations do well and can do well with the support of public entities. Commissioner Tuchscher asked South Bay Community Services to comment as to whether the new condition, Condition #8, had any fmancial impacts on them or impacts on their fmancing. Kathryn Lembo said it had no negative financial impacts, except for the amount of staff time that may have to be devoted to it. The financing would come both from the Cities of Chula Vista and National City and the State of California. The State of California had the same condition on the Casa Nuestra and they had no problem with the condition. Commissioner Carson commented that it could be a real coup for the City of Chula Vista if this works like they would like to have it work--agencies working together for a common cause-- South Bay YMCA, the MAAC Project, elementary schools, secondary schools, the adult school, the Literacy Team, the churches, the banks to help with the financing. What an idea! She thanked SBCS for bringing it before the Commission. VOTE: 7-0 - unanimously approved to grant the Conditional Use Permit. Chair Fuller thanked everyone who came to share their thoughts. Associate Planner Miller pointed out that this project was, tentatively scheduled for City Council hearing on July 13, 1993, for those who desired to attend that public hearing. -15- ,J)-/tJ9 -~~' RESOLUTION NO. PCC-93-39 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A SHORT-TERM, TRANSITIONAL HOUSING PROJECT FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES AT 31 FOURTH AVENUE IN THE R-3 ZONING DISTRICT WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on April 28, 1993 by South Bay Community Services ("Applicant"); and WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC-93-39) to establish a short-term, transitional housing project for homeless families for a maximum of 43 residents and one resident manager in the R-3 Zoning District ("Project") at 31 Fourth Avenue ("Project Site") (Attachment "A" in the Staff Report); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 21 days prior to the hearing; and WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely June 23, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration and Addendum issued on IS-93-36. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION hereby recommends that conditional use permit PCC-93-39 be approved by Council subject to the findings and conditions in the attached draft City Council Resolution. That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant and the City Council. PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this day 23rd day of June, 1993 by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Commissioners Carson, Fuller, Martin, Moot, Ray, Tarantino, and Tuchscher NOES: None ABSENT: None ( qAAA#<. -'d7~. Susan Fuller, Chair Cvl r; , I, .r.~. if I~ Nancy pley, ecre c)J~)){J .--s~/ RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINlITES ,))/)) / MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING Resource Conservation CQmmi<sion Chula Vista, California DRAFt 6:00 p.m. Mondav. .Tune 7. 1993 Conference Room #1 Public Services Buildinl! CALL MEETING TO ORDERlROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairman Kracha. Present: Commissioners Kracha, Hall, Johnson, Burrascano. Staff Present: Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid, Associate Planner Barbara Reid. Mr. Reid advised the commission that member McNair had advised him verbally of her resignation. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: MSUC (Johnson/Hall) (4-0) to approve the minutes of the May 24, 1993 meeting as presented. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Review of Ne~ative Declaration IS-93-36 - South Bay Community Services Associate Planner Barbara Reid introduced Dan Marcus of South Bay Community Services to review the proposal. Mr. Marcus cited the need for homeless family housing in the South Bay area, adding that this issue was addressed in the city's General Plan. He stated that this program would provide services for the homeless, coordinating with various public agencies. Families may stay for up to 60 days, during which time they must be working or actively seeking employment; a case manager will be assigned to each family. House rules will include prohibitions against drugs, alcohol, etc. -Commissioner Myers arrived at 6:08 p.m.- Mr. Marcus answered questions from the commissioners. This program is for families only, both (approximately SO/50) one- and two-parent families. -Commissioner Ghougassian arrived at 6: 10 p.m.- In response to further questions, Mr. Marcus stated that the City has committed to acquisition funds, with South Bay Community Services to be responsible for operations funding. If families are not stabilized after 60 days, SBCS will assist them into apartment units; additionally, a transitional housing program is being studied for the adjacent property. The original proposal has been modified somewhat in response to concerns raised; for example, each unit will have a kitchen, rather than the communal kitchen originally planned. Each case manager will handle twelve families, and the house rules are not yet completed. Hart Klein, a neighboring property owner, addressed the commission, advising that the Chula Vista Housing Authority had turned the project down on a 2-1 vote due to concerns about the fiscal sense of the program, finding it unreasonably expensive. He stated that the neighbors were against the project, and cited traffic/safety, lack of a play area for the children, and insufficient on-site parking as some of the reasons for opposition to the program at this location. _aD~ 0<)-- ) /2../ REI;OURCE CONSERV AnON COMMISSION -2- JUNE 9. 1993 Assistant Planner Reid summarized the concerns received in writing from neighbors, along with staffs response, as follows: 1) lack of a play area - this is an existing problem rather than one created by the program; 2) insufficient parking -a parking survey had been conducted, resulting in the conclusion that the majority of homeless people do not have vehicles; 3) traffic accidents on Fourth Avenue - project will not increase impacts due to less traffic originating from project; 4) noise -an accoustician had indicated that no impact would be anticipated; 5) fire access -fire department feels that access is sufficient. Commissioner Johnson asked if there was anything SBCS could do to make this project acceptable to the neighbors; Mr. Klein responded that the neighbors were also concerned about the fiscal responsibility of this program, citing other ways in which money could be spent to achieve a homeless housing program. Mr. Marcus responded that alternatives had been looked at. Ms. Reid pointed out three corrections to be made on page two of the mitigated negative declaration for this project. In paragraph one, third line, replace "resident" with "property owner"; paragraph 6, line one, replace "19" spaces with "24" spaces; paragraph 6, line ten, replace "0.38" (parking spaces per bed) with "0.16". Commissioner Ghougassian asked what would happen if the program proves unsuccessful; Ms. Reid responded that this would be handled through the conditional use permit as the land use document. Commissioner Myers stated that she strongly disagreed with the statement on page four of the environmental checklist which indicates that the existing school system is not expected to be impacted; she stated that the constant rotation of children from this program will impact the area school. Commissioner Hall voiced agreement with Myers' statements. MSC (Burrascano/Johnson) (5-1, Ghougassian opposed) to accept Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-93-36. MSUC (KrachalGhougassian) (6-0) that a condition of approval be included in the conditional use permit requiring annual review of the program. Commissioner Ghougassian felt that the City Council should note the following with regard to this program: 1) the existing population is 34 persons; 2) sensitivity should ~ demonstrated to the economic impact of this program on the neighborhood; 3) he is opposed to an additional potential project next door for long term homeless, as it perpetuates the homeless. 2. Budi!et for Fiscal Year 1993 - 1994 Environmental ReviewCoordinator Doug Reid explained the proposed budget for the next fiscal year, which has been tentatively approved by the City Council. Commissioner Kracha asked for an explanation of expenditures by this commission for the next meeting; commissioner Hall stated that she would like to look at ways of using excess funds next year to purchase plaques c2J- / U ...JlI" REC;OURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSlnN -3- JUNE 9. 1993 for historic sites. 3. Review of Plannine Commission Aeenda for June 9. 1993 Mr. Reid explained the items before the Planning Commission at its next meeting. STAff COMMENTS: Mr. Reid reported that the City Council had continued the proposed administrative procedures regarding the listing of the California Gnatcatcher from the meeting of June 1, 1993 until June 22, 1993. COMMISSIONER'S COMMENTS: Commissioner Hall stated that she had responded to the letter from the City Clerk indicating her continued interest in serving on this commission. Commissioner Myers stated that she had a schedule conflict with a class, and would therefore miss meetings for the next three months. Mr. Reid indicated that these would be excused absences. Commissioner Ghougassian stated that he would probably miss the next meeting due to a business trip. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. PiU~L_~ ~ V If\.-1\ Patty Nevins, Recorder ~ ) ~) /1 -qj.-' PUBLIC FORUM SUMMARY 02.)-))5 7:30-7:40 7:40-7:50 7:50-8:00 8:00-8:30 SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY MEETING AGENDA wednesday, April 28, 1993 7:30-8:30pm Introduction to South Bay Community Services Charles pugsley, Board of Directors President Description of Short-Term Housing Project Kathryn Lembo, SBCS Executive Director Answers to Previous Community Questions Kathryn Lembo, SBeS Executive Director Question and Answer Period ~)//)~ -q~/ SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMUNITY MEETING ON SHORT-TERM HOUSING April 28, 1993 LOCATION: Chula Vista Boys & Girls Club, 465 L Street ESTIMATED ATTENDANCE: 40 ESTIMATED SUPPORTERS/OPPONENTS: 20/20 Attendance List passed by SBCS: Unavailable. Currently in the possess~on of Mrs. Charles W. Hickey, 21 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Introduction to South Bav Communitv Services South Bay Community Services (SBCS) is a community-based, IRS 501 (c) (3) nonprofit organization serving the South San Diego Bay Area. The agency's mission is to provide children, youth, and families with services and programs which reinforce the family's role in the community and assist individuals to aspire realistically to lives of self-fulfillment. SBCS began in 1971 as a treatment rehabilitation center for drug- abusing teens. Over the years, other youth and family support programs have been initiated including: juvenile diversion, gang intervention, alternative schooling, after-school child care, employment assistance, counseling, literacy/tutoring, entrepreneurial training, AIDS prevention education and affordable housing assistance. SBCS also runs Casa Nuestra, the only homeless housing in the South Bay region, providing beds and 24-hour services for runaway and homeless teens. SBCS served over 6000 local youths and family members in 1992. Description of Short-Term Housinq proiect and Answers to Previous Communi tv Ouestions The project will provide 50 beds for Chula Vista and National City homeless families with children working to become self-sufficient. It will be located at 31 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista. Outside funds have been committed to leverage Chula Vista's money, including $250,000 from National City, $31,000 from the local FEMA Board, and $105,000 from the State of California's Proposition 84 Bond funds. The State awarded SBCS 87% of the dollars available for the entire San Diego County, citing the need for a project like this in the South Bay, and this project's viability. Private donations for operations totaling more than $40,000 have already been raised from groups like the San Diego Community Foundation, Household Bank, Home Depot, and Wells Fargo Bank, plus individual donors. Additional private dollars are currently being sought. Fieldstone Corporation, a private developer is considering donating rehabilitation work and materials. Families will be referred from local organizations which currently work with the homeless including schools, police, private nonprofit organizations, and religious institutions. ..2/~/!7 - q.r/ Families with any drug abuse, alcohol, or mental illness problems will not be accepted into the program. They will be referred to, and provided transportation to, other programs. SBCS worked with City staff, the Ecumenical Council, and service agencies to find an appropriate project site. 31 Fourth was chosen after researching many other possibilities including bank foreclosures, motels, abandoned buildings, and apartments. The project costs much projects in the area. cost over $100,000 per less per unit (@ $71,000) than similar A project recently built at Third and Oxford unit. SBCS is coordinating a team of private, local service providers including MAAC Project, Lutheran Social Services, and Episcopal Community Services to provide a wide range of services geared at helping families achieve self-sufficiency. The services include: job training and referral, child care, case management, health care, permanent housing referral, budgeting, independent living skills, literacy training, psychological counseling, and transportation. There will be off-site child care and recreation activities for the children, as well as on-site property management. SBCS will hire an experience property management company. SBCS staff has met with Mrs. Hickey, Mr. Klein, property residents, and neighbors; listening to their concerns, answering questions, and providing materials which they have requested. Based on the experience of similar projects around the State of California, the project will not decrease values of surrounding properties, or add to the area's transient population, gang membership, or crime. Rather it will diminish these problems in Chula vista and National City by helping families become self- sufficient. Neighbors of SBCS' homeless youth shelter, including those directly adjacent on the north and east sides, have signed a statement that it, "has not posed any problems to our neighborhood.... they have been considerate neighbors to us". Attendees Ouestions and Answers Bow will families enter the project? Families will be referred through an established network of social services providers, religious institutions, community groups, and government agencies which currently work with homeless families. No family will be able to enter the project without such a referral. No family will be able to walk up to 31 Fourth Avenue and move in to the project. will the project be a safe house for illegal immigrants? No, the project will provide housing and supportive services c2}~J/[( r' - q~; for families willing to work to get back on their feet. South Bay Community Services does not intend to house non-U.S. citizens or families which are not from Chula vista or National City. HUD guidelines and Federal Fair Housing law prohibit SBCS, and any property owner, from rejecting certain housing applicants. Then, how will you know families are Chula Vista or Rational City residents? Since the housing is only for families with children, we will be able to utilize school records. Can we meet a family that will live there? Yes, homeless families will be asked to attend future public meetings. (NOTE: At least one homeless family attended the May 11, 1993 City Council meeting where a Public Hearing on CDBG funding for the project was held.) This project will increase the huge federal budget deficit. How in good conscience can a public entity do that? #1. This project is utilizing dollars approved by Congress in the 1992 fiscal year budget. These dollars have already been appropriated for use funding homeless housing in America and are already calculated as part of the federal deficit. #2. Private dollars are also being utilized. Donations for operations totaling more than $40,000 have already been raised from groups like Household Bank, Home Depot, local religious institutions, and individual donors. Additional private dollars are currently being sought. Fieldstone Corporation, a private developer is considering donating rehab work and materials. #3. South Bay Community Services is not a public organization, but a private organization, under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Service code. You paid too much for the apartment. SBCS is in escrow to buy the 14-unit building for $720,000. It was appraised by an MAI appraiser in April, 1992 at $750,000. SBCS worked with City staff, the Ecumenical Council, and service agencies to find an appropriate project site. 31 Fourth was chosen after researching many other possibilities including bank foreclosures, motels, abandoned buildings, and apartments. The project costs much less per unit (@ $71,000) than similar projects in the area. A project. recently built at Third and Oxford cost over $100,000 per unit. The apartment is unsuitable for children. A number of children currently live in the apartment building. Children in the proposed project will be provided with after-school child care, Head Start, .volunteer "Big Brother\Big Sister" and supervision programs. Eucalyptus Park and the YMCA are directly across the street and are constantly busy with children playing. Your program will decrea.e our property values. A study conducted by the State of California's Department of Housing and Community Development reviewed 15 studies nationwide on c1J.~)/( ~q{P, the effects of affordable housing projects on neighboring property values. It reports, "of these 15 publications, 14 reached to conclusion that there are no significant negative effects from locating subsidized, special-purpose or manufactured housing near market-rate developments." Neighbors of your homeless youth shelter have written and called the City with complaints about noise and other problems (a sign was posted with a letter from one neighbor, the Woods Family). SBCS surveyed neighbors within the last two weeks. Eight neighbors, including families directly adjacent to the north and east signed the following petition, "We, the undersigned, declare that we live in the vicinity of South Bay Community Services' runaway and homeless youth shelter, Casa Nuestra. We have found that Casa Nuestra has not posed any problems from their facility's clients. The exterior of the house is kept clean and blends in with the other houses on the block. They have been considerate neighbors to us." The proposed project will add to neighborhood problems like gangs and crime. SBCS operates a Gang Intervention Program in which four experienced counselors work with gang members and youths involved in gangs. They will help screen families to ensure no gang members or associates live in the project. Families will also be screened for alcohol, drug use, and mental illness. Those needing these services will be referred to other programs in San Diego. There will be no alcohol or drugs allowed on the property. How will the property be managed and maintained? SBCS will hire an experienced property management company to operate the property. This company will subcontract with landscape and janitorial companies to maintain the property. Additionally, SBCS will hire one Manager to work with families, linking them to needed supportive services, and one half-time Director to supervise project operations. ,)//))0 /q0- LETTERS/PETITIONS FROM lNTERESTED PARTIES cl) - );2/ ~~to , ' - nh... . ~: -..lv,.: i _ " i.../-~ 9~ ti k~~ .At-~.e p~-"- ~~ .~.-??~...-...- ~ ~~~~.,...X~ "8" ~ t?~~ -r.J!- ~ 1- .?tL- ~ Yna.:&~ ~ J~ c'""-'" ~ /0. /9'9 :5_ ,_ ,~~ ,h'IA~ ~ ~ c-y ~~) -;( t'~~ ~ ~ L~ QL.,..~ ::d...,f J h~ DF..-y,'t.:0 ) - ..~r>~ ~~..L ./'f- /"'}, ~t~ _ ~.~ - ~~7,d...;::r- h -e,Z3 --q-tl ~/ ~~ ~ l'/J J"'~Y ,:?~A--~~cJ ~~ I?'?L, . .,'. 9-r d~" , T 5'''' ~^-- W/(f Lv--e-t.~ ~ l....-<-<-~ .A~'7::Pd..::r- /"",~.;r .-<-? \. ~ ~1 ~-c---....- ~J .-L~~ ~ ~-(,~o C'~v" u/ ~ LJ '. _. I ~r ~r- ~ ~ tyV-- cA- ~ " iL ~ C'1;A..<-e , j ~ }T~ ~---/~ ;::t; ~ ~ ~rd ~/>_.A'- 1 ~~~/ Ie- ~ ~ --L~~.L-- ~ ~ ~'V^~ ~ .Ar-.--- -~ ~ 'c::- ~f) v~ C'~. -!)~0 :;~-~ V""<",-J- d-t-/7V...L,.( . ~ ?fr~ ~~ L__:~ ~-..--<... ~6 J1.~' (\ ?" 0l ;t:i~ ~''-- :2/ - /.2 ;}-" ~ )~ -q~/ ~ . -0/~k--~. .9-~~~~~~ ~ - ~ ~"CI'---- a2-c- ~ ",,--J-~ 6 -tih.- ~ 2 ~ ~--'- .- "()- .;2, ~ ~. ~ /7lJ~ ~~~ ~~~,A ~ /U--c. <" "~T" -e......:...6' ~6 ~ ~ /?61 ,,~a ~~~, J. ~ ~"~6 (/:v'r_--cE'-~ <-/ ~ ~ ~ ~ _~ c~ ~~) /f.h-e'____ :_:::r/Z~,,-- .;:1.. .-A---<~:r-- <l-?-l.j; L~ ~ ~ c) .f-<;:: /--<<--<-C .nk-~__"--ru.?-~."'~--4-~ +~ C! / ~ /~, C-L----Ji , )' ?i (( k~~ ?f'-l ~v ;;d-~ ~ / ~ ~ .~ . --z:L-- y~ J-_ ~; ;( / t.- ;Pic'; ,vz.-<- ,bf /7=- ~P-- ~ r ' ~~~~~~7 cJ,///;23 -qq, McDoNALD, HECHT & SOLBERG RU'd IR/ ,1.3/~ ~ @ r;'1J' f. l'n. ALEX C MCDONALD" A JOf-'N HECHT" DARRYL 0 SOLBERG" JEROLD H GOLDBERG' PAUL E. ROBINSON' THOMAS C. NE:LSONO FlOBERTA S. ROBINSON' DAVID W. BAGLEY, II' CHARLES R. GILL" MICHAEL J MAHER RICHARD A. SCHU\..MAN LAURI CROCE:: STREETER DAVID R B LITTLE PETER K. SOLE:CKI A PARTNER$H1P INCLUCING PROFESSIONAl.. CORPORATIONS TELEPHONE (6\9) 23Si1-3444 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 WEST BI'lOADWAV. EIQHTI-l FLOOR SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 TELECOPIER 1619) 232-682:8 .""',,"OTES" "~O"l!:5S'O"'A.. COA"O,.ATION June 23, 1993 Chairperson Susan Fuller and Members of the Chula vista Planning Commission 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 92010 Re: Planning commission Agenda of June 23, 1993, Public Hearing No.1, South Bay community services ("SBCS") Application for Conditional Use Permit No. PCC-93-39 Dear Chairperson Fuller and Members of the Chula vista Planning Commission: We write you on behalf of our clients, Hart G. Klein and Barbara G. Klein, Trustees of the Klein Family Trust dated January 22, 1980 and Alan J. Brant and Lavonne Brant, Co-Trustees of the Brant Revocable Family Trust dated October 26, 1988, the owners of properties located at 45, 47 and 49 Fourth Avenue in the City of Chula vista. The purpose of this letter is to set forth various reasons why vou should not recommend approval of the above- referenced Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). The property, which is the subject of the SBCS Application for the CUP, is located at 31 Fourth Avenue in the City of Chula vista ("property"). currently, there exists fourteen (14) mUlti-family dwelling units on the Property. The proposed CUP has been modified to purportedly permit a maximum forty-four (44) persons to reside on site. The prior application indicated that the Property would be redeveloped to permit fifty (50) persons to reside on site. In either event it is obvious that at a minimum the number of people that will reside on the Property will increase by at least thirty- three percent (33%) [it is estimated that approximately thirty (30) people reside on the property presently.] 02)-1.21' _lfJO ' June 23, 1993 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES NOT ADEOUATELY ADDRESSED It appears from the Chula vista Planning files that multiple environmental impacts have not been addressed by the environmental review process, which has culminated in the Negative Declaration before you. We are attaching for your review a memorandum from Mr. William Ulrich, City of Chula vista Engineering Department and a letter from Ms. Kate Shurson, Director of Planning and Facilities, Chula vista Elementary School District. The Ulrich memorandum indicates that the Chula vista city Engineers requested various public improvements in order for the CUP to be approved. The need for these improvements have not found their way into the environmental review process or the proposed conditions of approval for the CUP. As you can see from the memorandum, the city's engineers believe that the Chula vista Municipal Code requires the inclusion of certain public improvements, such as the widening of Fourth Avenue. These environmental issues should have been discussed in an environmental impact report ("ErR") and a clear statement should have been incorporated as to why they are not required as conditions of approval of the CUP, if that statement can be made. Somehow these requests/issues by the City's engineers were lost or misplaced in the selective Negative Declaration process. The School District correspondence indicates a concern that the proposed CUP could have an impact on at least one school within the District. Granted, the concern of Ms. Kate Shurson was modified in a subsequent letter, dated June 18, 1993, after the conditions of approval for the CUP were modified. The point is clear, the potential impacts to all affected schools should have been addressed in the proper legal manner; by way of an EIR. The most blatant disregard for the EIR process is found in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Addendum to said document. Both the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Addendum provide a discussion of potential drainage problems for the Property. The original Mitigated Negative Declaration indicated that these issues would be addressed at a later time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The exact problems and the magnitude of those problems are not clearly defined anywhere. The processing of an EIR would have most likely required soils and/or drainage reports submitted to the city. The analyses and the conclusions of those reports would have been available for public review and comment. Once again, having reconsidered the original Mitigated Negative Declaration, an Addendum was hastily drafted and attached 2)~J;2v5 ~ I 01 ~ June 23, 1993 Page 3 which purportedly provides the reader with additional information and analyses. We submit those are not present in either the Mitigated Negative Declaration or the afterthought Addendum. As further evidence that the California Environmental Quality Act and its guidelines were going to be ignored, the staff files reveal a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration, dated May 17, 1993, which is four (4) days prior to the end of the publ ic comment period for the Environmental Initial study (ending May 21, 1993). PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT IN THE CUP PROCESS The City files indicate that SBCS contacted the neighbors of the Property early in the planning stages for the CUP. We can state, unequivocally, on behalf of our clients that this is not accurate. The first time our clients were aware of the proposed CUP was March 25, 1993, by way of an article in the San Diego Union. It appeared that the CUP was well on its way by that date. SBCS OPERATION MUST NOT DISCRIMINATE SBCS represented to interested parties on April 28, 1993 that "Families with drug abuse, alcohol, or mental illness problems will not be accepted into the program." We believe this position would violate federal laws. The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1991 prohibits discrimination against various groups including but not limited to the mentally ill and recovering substance abusers for this type of housing. This is one more example of misinformation, inadvertently provided or otherwise, from SBCS. CONCLUSION If we had been provided more time, we would have been able to submit to you information on a number of additional issues germane to your decision. The essence of our position is that the Property is inappropriate for the CUP. In addition, the process that has been used by SBCS and city staff for the CUP is fatally flawed. 02J~/.2? ___10;)-/ June 23, 1993 Page 4 We respectfully ask that you recommend denial of the CUP to the Chula vista City Council. This position is supported by the Chula vista Housing Advisory Committee on Februarv 24. 1993 (4-2 to deny) and the Chula vista star News on March 6, 1993. sincerely, A.P.C. SOLBERG PER/bar Enclosures cc: Mr. Hart G. Klein, (wjenclosures) Mr. John Goss, (wjenclosures) city Manager, City of Chula vista Mr. Bruce Boogaard, (wjenclosures) City Attorney, City of Chula vista Mr. Robert Leiter, (wjenclosures) planning Director, City of Chula vista d 1- /0-) -I ()~ ' 'V ~ May 11, 1993 File iI ZB-370 TO: Martin Mil~er, Planniqg Department f/~ VIA: . Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director\ City Enqineer ~ William A. Ullrich, Senior civil Engin Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer Conditional Use Permit for short term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue (PCC-93-39} FROM: ,W"... ~. ",SUBJECT: .' ~ ,":--v I . t..:.t..~.,'!.::_~ Y,' ..,;-~. ~ .';'1\', . ;;,The- Public Works Department 'has reviewed the subject proposal. We 1fto not propose the inclusion of any conditions of approval for the ~'~9nditional Use Permit. However, we request that you provide the .' ~~applicant with the fOllowing list of items which will be required .,. t. in conjunction with any building permit. ;-'.',.".. . :These items are required under the authority of the Municipal Code: 1\. Chula Vista ......... ' Street widening on Fourth Avenue to 45' centerline pavement. Public improvements may include but not to: to edge of be limited U.;"'o":" ~ ~., c.' raised concrete median ( 1'2. !eECll"'(~EO Q<Cll"""" PE:FEJ:tAL. ~ asphalt concrete paving curb, sidewalk, gutter applicant may apply for a deferral of public improvements a. b. d. 2. A construction permit will be required for any work performed in the street right-of-way. 3. ~ubmittal of improvement plans. I'> Street right of way dedication of ~I. _"is,.d 14. cy~" HSB:rb ?/':~; "+'1.,-, '';';;'';;. ;'.'" .... C/CUP18.MfH) "~~:'7.<.r"::"", 't.:'~.'"'' \;"" ~:...... . 'Pt~."',_. , , .-....-. ~I-I~ _Iotf-- :L' :;2" "i IOARD DFEDUCUION JOSEP" O. C'JllMI',GS. PhO Lfl.R:'tV C'.Jr;'~r.~Gli^"A SUA"O" G~ES PAlmCKA JUCD GR:G R. SA'lOOVAt. surERlmE>lDENT JOliN F V'.l()nIN. f'l- !) CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT A4 F.AST "J" STRF.ET . CIIVIA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 · 6]9425.9600 ------.- BACH CIIlLD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH June 17, 1993 Mr Martin Miller Planning Department City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: 31 Fourth Avenue Its-93-36 14 Unit Apt. Complex (Existing Bldg.) for Homeless Families Dear Mr Miller On May 12. 1993, I responded to an initial study for this project (copy enclosed). At that time. it was not clear how m~ny children would be involved I understand now that the Center is anticipated to house between 34 - 44 children for "transitional 60 day limited housing" While it IS true that no new construction appears to be proposed and therefore, nO developer fees are required. converting 14 apartments into a facility housing that many children will create a significant impact on Feaster School, one of the District's most overcrowded There is no capacity at that school to house any additional children. as neighborhood children have been overflow bused from that school all year. We ask that the environmental review for this proposal provide mitigation for these adverse impacts on elementary facilities. If you have any questions, please call me. Sincerely. ~~I Kate Shurson Director of Planning & Facilities KSdp cc: Kathryn Lembo, S Bay Community Services, tnc. Principal, Feaster School 'lHlr. 11.C1l'I.V c9l-/a-q ...- D~ r -I M E M o ~A E Iq I TI~ '3''''''-- A.M '~~I 'J If'" ..J Q I I PI,,' AREA CODE F 1)0 -01 t :t- NO EXT (Y\ IliIhorh:./e.:s A dJ-1- I~O ()~ /' - / \/Ipl J' :/ .' ri: A~_ . l~d-f.,--c.-- ~-:-.:-/'-" _ r .L- /J ~'0--' . R=-CE!V:-:r:: IW...-iL0'~ ~ r~d-/7~ JUNS319S .,;;{ ~ y~ >rp .~ /~. / /~ t. - " -. - ~L'A:'; _. 7f/~-/D' . -,:?-- ~7 ;-.. ., - . <-._J - _. . -~ 7~ ~~.J~~~~;r,;-/_/ - CL'-<.-/ .~.A<J<:r=._L~C'-'J'4~.~~ -- '7~ ~~ ~/'---' .'.r;..:Z"~~~~ ft ~ I ~ ~ --c:-~ _- J) ;/_If-T<J 1~ /J /7~ .- ~.(-<-./ _ ~~/ ~..::i'/ ;z-'~~d:/d.,,-- ~~~~~D-'7 ~!/J'_7:___v/~ 7Yo6-~~~~~~ ~ . ~~~ v -_'-';-- - -~ ~-,~c:~:;,~'<=:::2_~:'~ ;6:;~-e-. ~~~~~~~ v-v~ ,,-__c.--""- '-S: ~~ _:13:"';'<-'- J. /.4./. . ...4.--'-<- '" d ~ ~~-e.-:- ,67_ r. ~ r:2LC~-Le- P--~<--"'----~ U->..e....~:. '-' '~'~___-;".J -/ ~~~Ye'</ ~ ~~~~..o 0.... ;r-~~~~~' --d'" --z~~' .~e: -?A... z ~-<-~?L?/'~7 ('~ - /., - - ,c; -___~..,.e..~~~"'-.-~ )~ ~ .e..../Z~. ..z.J_.J)-d"'d;X~~-e.-- ~..-<-<-~~.~~~~~~ ~4~''''~' ~J2..0-~-v ~...;r/D 7~ -f ~. ~~_~2::'~-Cl .J>,C1'-e.~~ ~~~~~~ - ~~-~.~~~~-<"-' 2 .~/~ ~c:-/-~~ x-~~.:/~~~~~._~ (\ N~e<--~_z- ~~~ c~-_Ln7_/~ {/[-~~~.e._,<--.~_.~~-4:./:::=-O ~ _<.--<..<,-;?y~. ~~~;t-P/..z- .73h,~?f~,e.-.- ;;V:"'</~o~p y~ ~ '/ ~ .. ~__/4C~ 7~~r--/""~ ;r%~'-_d~.~~/=~/- ~ ~~~ or< -e.- ~ <..-" -.e:..... _ fi/rL~ u:;;~ ~ "" .. -fLz:::;/<-c- ;:>t: d / .d~~ ---;h-' .-!:-,.. -/ ~ p ~. ~ d, ~ 0./ ~ .-;??t"-""/, -'_ V' ~ '/"" ~(' ~~ '~M/~~)~7/J?=n_/7 "k~'.;~::-::<Z:~~:::; L;--- ~ ~o/~.i2~ -./~.-L--;:; _/~C>,<.~~~~ _--.;, '7 ~~~_~.z-A~-:.., j/ ? /// ~.~. Y_~J~ ."'.. u.<-.V~~~~ ~/ -~.t:1~7 ~;;~A_~_~_L<..>r;i,~{/~~~~~~ rtt- "z)~ -~.~~ /n.~"--' ~-<L-/~ ~r"',;-/.ee..--. ~~- . d~tZ~. d('~ s- ~~C?--L, .y~v<-/ ,;u- / ~~~ rs> ~_?~~~ ~_~" , . .: ~~~ ed,<.t7~{/~ -_d /~. .. e.~~ ~ZJ;LA,~, ?/~/.Y 0& ' _I r "';:"'" C' " - \, ..:.,. To be delivered to the Planning Commission by Noon, June 23. I received in today's mail, a 100 page report from the Planning Department on the public Hearing for June 23, 1993 on the purchase of 31 4th Avenue. It is physically impossible for me to assimilate a report of this size in just two days as I have other things to do as well as read this lengthy report. However, the Planning Department has recommended that the plan be watered down to serve only 43 people and to recommend that the delapidated 31 4th Avenue be used "as is". Of course, if these recommendations are followed, there is absolutely no need to purchase 31 4th Avenue at all because comparable apartments, in better condition, with better facilities, better landscaping, better parking, better safety features. established safe playgrounds for the children and better integrated among their peer group so that no one's feeling will be hurt by being segreated as "homeless" at available just next door at 21 4th Avenue. The low rents of $450 per month for a brand new, newly furnished 1 BR apartment is much more economically feasible than paying $1,000,000 to purchase a delapidated apartment building in need of deferred maintenance (according to Kathryn Lembo's report dated 2-9-93). If Kathryn Lembo really sincere that her motive is to help the homeless, she will not need for you purchase her a building. She can start to~orrow morning at 8:00 a. m. to rehabilitate the homeless. Please see the attached report which will be read in its entirety at the meeting tonight. If one speaker goes over the 5 minute limit, the next apeaker who has signed up to speak, will continue until the entire report is read. .;)1 - 16~ Regina Hickey ~(Dq/ ~ , - 1 - I urge you to vote "no" on the conditional use permit for South Bay Community Services, Inc., to purchase 31 4th Avenue as a transitional housing for the homeless. The SBCS, Inc. is in violation of their conditional use permit at 1515 Hilltop, which provides they will NOT DISTURB THE NEIGHBORS. No matter how many signatures Kathryn Lembo brings in stating some one else is NOT DISTURBED, I would like to introduce into the minutes of this meeting a letter sent to me by Mr. and Mrs. Leo Wood, 1525 Hilltop Drive. Mr. Wood is a former Fire Marshall of the City of Chula Vista and you can believe he wrote this letter because Kathryn Lembo did not keep her promise to you, not to disturb the neighbors. Read letter Instead of getting control of these 8 teen-agers Kathryn Lembo makes it appear as if Mr. and Mrs. Wood are some kind of a nut. if I am concerned because/I need to complain about the conditional use permit, if approved, that Kathryn Lembo will pass off legitimate complaints as she has done at 1515 Hilltop, instead of going down and getting control of her project. It is well known that three members of the City Council voted at their meeting at 1:00 o'clock in the morning to fund Kathryn Lembo's project BEFORE THE ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS WERE CONSULTED ABOUT THE CHANGE IN THEIR NEIGHBORHOOD. It is also well known that the City Council does not answer letters or grant interviews with Chula Vista who oppose their administrative decisions. They appear to be secure that NO ONE CAN CHALLENGE THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE POWER. Is Chula Vista a Democracy? Or, does the City Council have so much power it can over-ride documented evidence, it can ove r-ride community in-put, it can over-ride the commission it relies upon for support? I suggest this hearing is not about housing the homeless. No one is against that and there is no doubt in my mind that all of the homeless in Chula Vista can be served for the price of this project, which at the most will serve 44 people. May I say to you, if you gentlemen on the Planning Commissiion do not exercise your freedom-of judgment and make certain that your vote counts, you will wake up one day and you will realize you do not have any freedoms. When this happens, the United States of America will not be the wonderful country it is today and I, for one, will weep. I would like to quote from a letter from Fr. Joe Carroll regarding d-I- /34 _/10 - 2 - this project: He wrote to me that he supports the concept but not the location. He ended his letter by saying that everyone should cooperate in selecting THE VERY BEST LOCATION FOR THIS SHELTER. According to the report I received from the Planning Department dated June 17, 1993, they are recommending that Kathryn Lembo's proposal be scaled down to serve only 43 people. This change, of course, makes the proposal EVEN MORE ECONOMICALLY unfeasible than it was before. The General Partners, Joe O'Keefe and Paul Ruklavich, the sellers of 31 4th Avenue are well aware they are being overpaid for the two delapidated buildings at 17 4th Avenue and 31 4th Avenue. These two realtors took these two apartment buildings off the market on the assurance from Kathryn Lembo that she would get her conditional use permit from the planning commission. How she knew that I don't know. Mr. O'Keefe and Mr. Rukalavich are laughing all the way to the bank because Kathryn Lembo is such a poor business woman that she does not know there are many, many others buildings available at one-half the price. Furthermore, the Planning Department has recommended that the proposal be scaled down by using the apartments "as is". See page 1-13 In view of the number of vacancies at 21 4th Avenue (due to the poor economic conditions in Chula Vista) A MUCH MORE FEASIBLE plan would be for the South Bay Community Services, Inc., to lease EXISTING VACANT APARTMENTS AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS. The location would be the same so the balance of Kathryn's program could go forward as planned. JUST THE NEED TO PURCHASE A BUILDING WOULD BE ELIMINATED: The owner of 21 4th Avenue has up-graded the apartments in conformance with current planning department rules and would be a perfect location for this p~Dposal. 21 4th Avenue has a legal fire department turn around, which 31 4th Avenue does not, making 21 4th Avenue a BETTER location for the proposal. Kathryn Lembo did not tell the truth when she said there is a fire department turn-around at 31 4th Avenue. When Hart Klein and myself make gated communities of our apartments, 31 4th Avenue will only have a legal right of ingress and egress along a 20' private easement. On their 100' lot they announce they will park 18 cars. This means that fire equipme nt or emergency vehicles, as well as other large nehicles like the trash trucks will be forced to back up on a la' ingress ~asement to Offerman La~e, make a backwards turn against on-coming traffic, back up on a 10' ingress easement, make a backwards turn against on-coming traffic on 4th Avenue to turn their vehicles facing the correct direction to continue into the traffic pattern. -11-1.: ,5d,,",1 8::.'- o..i3,-r:: ~.J pf,"'rf~ ~ -Jl....,C :..J"V\ir-~..~~ 'STrip o..~......, ..~ ...,....-<.....€ t.......___:.c, ",)'- -r:1_.-:.--- r_ -{,~ ....(..., ~::tf" ~ #1:_ U ~ ~~ ~~ There is plenty of pArking at 21 4th Avenue while the p;arking at 31 4th Avenue is inadequate. 'V ,I rur A. ,~~ 'r> --- ciLl- I~tr ~tl/ - - 3 - I again urge you to deny this conditional use permit for 31 4th Avenue ON THE BASIS THERE IS EXISTING LEGAL HOUSING UNITS AVAILABLE where no conditional use permit is require, and there is no need to purchase a run-down apartment house, which requires a condi- tional use permit. I say to you, preserve the integrity of your zone laws, to which everyone else is subjected. Once one conditional use permit is granted, that opens the way for more at a later date. Once saying "yes" to this substandard building, it would be impossible to say "no" to any future request. I say to you, integrate the homeless families into existing furnished apartments. When the non-working homeless have as a role model, the working poor, who live next door to them, those of Kathryn's families who really wish to turn their lives around by working, will see that a working life style is easily available to them. Even the children of the homeless will see IT IS POSSIBLE for their parents to find jobs and they will be an influence on their parents to give up their homeless life style. I HEREBY OFFER 14 of my brand new, furnished, apartments at 21 4th Avenue to Kathryn Lembo for so long as she needs them at a rental rate of $450 per month--no deposit, providing Kathryn assumes responsibility for the cleaning between occupants, and for any UNUSUAL DAMAGE. There will be NO NEED for a conditional use permit at 21 4th Avenue because I am already licensed to offer the housing Kathryn Lembo says she needs to institute her program to rehabilitate the homeless. I have 40 years I will have no 1515 Hill top. of experience in managing low-rent furnished housing. problems with my neighbors as Kathryn Lembo has at After 40 years, I have never had one complaint. Management is included in my basic rent. There will be no need to hire a Manager or to give up an apartment which could be used in the proposal. It defies common sense to disturb 14 satisfied tenants residing at 31 4th Avenue and waste $1,000,000 to purchase 31 4th Avenue and doe the deferred maintenance Kathryn stated was necessary in her report dated 2-9-93. Not only will the $1,000,000 be saved, but there will be no maintenance or up-keep, no fire insurance, no liability insurance, no workman's compensation insurance, no employee benefits, no taxes to pay, no depreciation, no painting between occupancy, no plumbing or electrical repair, no expense at all -- just $450 per unit or $6500 per month for a completely furnished brand new apartment. I pay for the gardening and all up-keep. A volunteer from the SBCS, Inc. came by my office taking a cJ- I - /3 t.e -1/:1-- - 4 - survey of vacKant apartment to relocate tenants from 31 4th Avenue. I outlined my idea to him and shows him 21-A-- completely re-done, brand new furniture, a view of the ocean, all for $450 per month. He was astounded and stated to me he couldn't understand why my offer would not be better for Kathryn's proposal to rehabilitate the homeless into productive citizens. By watering down her proposal and the services she previously planned to offer, Kathryn Lembo has finally come to her senses and now she can save the City of Chula Vista $1,000,000 which could be returned to the State and the Federal government to reduce the national deficit. It would be far better for the South Bay Community Services, Inc. to utilize existing furnished apartment for their planned assistance to the homeless. I read in the report of the Planning Department that it is considered good planning to integrate different uses in one zone. What could be better than integrating these homeless people among other poor people who work to pay the rent on their apartments? I appeal to everyone in this Chamber tonight and to everyone who is listening to these proceedings on Cox Cable TV to write and phone to the Planning Commission and to the Mayor and the City Council to not waste taxpayers money by purchasing 31 4th Avenue when for a mere $6500 a month rent (no extra expenses whatsoever) 14 families can be housing in brand new apartments, located in beautiful surroundings and managed by owner-management with 40 years experience in providing clean, attractive low-rent housing to Chula Vista free of all public subsidy. The Mayor and the City Council are elected to serve you and me. They are obligated to exercise ordinary good business practice in the expenditure of taxpayers' money. They are not elected to serve a private non-profit corporation such as the one Kathryn Lembo heads. Kathryn Lembo can commence her program at 8:00 tomorrow morning by leasing my vacant apartments at 21 4th Avenue. No public subsidy, no bureaucratic supervision--just the American way-- Sign the lease and move in: Please deny this conditional use permit are being unnecessary and recommend to Kathryn Lembo that she contact me at my office about my offer. It will be my pleasure to assist her in her proposal and I will feel in my heart that I took Fr. Joe Carroll's advice to me: Don't just complain but offer a better alternative. 91-/.3-7- -1I3~ June 19, 1993 TO: All Concerned FROM: Robert C. Frazer 321 D Street, Chu1a Vista, Ca 91910 SUBJECT: Proposed SECOND Social Service Facility in our neighborhood (Family Homeless Center, 31 Fourth Ave) We already have a facility for mentally disadvantaged adults at 329A "D" Street. This Facility was approved by the city and constructed in Spring of 1966. Our neighborhood has since faced the following problems: 1) Public masturbation 2) Peeping Toms 3) Tormenting of pets 4) Trespass ing 5) Indecent exposure It is simply not fair to sUbject our neighborhood to another social service facility, which will bring with it new problems, and will, of course, reduce property values. ;iZt{uU /Robert C. Frazer ~ d { - { 38 - /'4 ~ tEASER & WARWICK, INC. . 345 oFo STREET, SUITE 230 . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 420-3300 June 18, 1993 j.)' . Planning Commission City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RE: Application of South Bay Community Services for short term housing permit - 31 Fourth Avenue Gentlemen, We have further discussed the captioned application with the applicant and are now of the belief that if the property is intended to serve families only and that if single persons pushing shopping carts, drunks and other undesirables are not allowed to loiter around the building our objections to the permit being granted are mitigated. It is our understanding that South Bay Community Services or some similar agency would approve all applicants for housing and that lines of applicants would not form on site. Sincerely, CREASER & WaRWICK, INC. I: '-~ \. ~ l( tL<.L Phil Creaser President d[- /d1 ...- ~ IP--- .-- '6 June 17, 1993 Mr. Chris Salomone Director, Community Development Dept. City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 Re: Letter from Kathryn Lembo, Executive Director, South Bay Community Services, Inc., dated February 9, 1993 Dear Mr. Salomone: Continuing my letter of June 6, 1993, with regard to objections to the statements contained in the above letter, I would like to bring up other issues to be address: page 1: 4th paragraph - "Impending mobile park closure." 5th paragraph - "many units which house lower income families are at risk of closure." Response: It is exceedingly unfair that the Chula Vista City Council and the Planning Department DO NOT ALLOW THE PRIVATE SECTOR to build low-rent units and/or replace demolished low-rent units. The Democratic way is to allow the public sector to use their resources to provide low-cost housing as they did prior to regulation by the Planning Department to prohibit it. This type of housing pays taces and fees, is self-supporting and requires no public subsidy. This artificially created shortage, because of government policy, has caused an artificial shortage which can best be solved by returning to the 1969 housing standards. Mayor Nader personally told me he was going to do this but to date he has not done so. To fill this artificial shortage with public subsidy is wasteful. The public sector must not only buy the property but 6hey must support the South Bay Community Services, Inc. and pay for the operation by a separate management team. These people do not work for nothing. The South Bay Community Services, Inc, should use their influence with the City Council to allow low-rent housing to be built, thereby leaving housing the poor to those d-I - (40 -/1"''--- - 2 - who understand it best and will do it free of public subsidy. The latter method will help reduce our national deficit. It will also add much needed income to the City of Chula Vista through property taxes, fees etc. The fact that the SBCS, Inc. intends to hire an experienced property management firm shows they themselves have no expertise in this area. They should not be wasing taxpayers' money by dabbling in real estate. Let the private sector do it. Page 1: Need for Homeless Housing SBCS, Inc. is in violation of their conditional use permit at Casa Nuestra, 1515 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista. Kathryn Lembo has disturbed the neighbors at 1525 Hilltop (in violation of her permit). Instead of going down and getting control of 8 teen-agers, Kathryn Lembo has resorted to citicism of Mr. and Mrs. Leo Wood (the people she is disturbing) who live at 1525 Hilltop, make it seem as if the disturbance to the neighbor- hood is somehow their fault. The failure to control the 8 teen-agers at Case Nuestra shows SBCS, Inc. has failed in their efforts to manage property and cannot be relied upon to control the proposed 50 homeless people circulating through 31 4th Avwenue every 60 days. Meeting the Need: Response: 1. Short term housing. By it's very nature, rental housing would be cheaper. There is no need to PURCHASE real estate for short term housing. . 2. Transitional Housing. By it's very nature, rental housing would be cheaper. There is no need to purchase real estate for transitional housing as there are vacancies at 21, 45, 47 and 49 4th Avenue which could be leased for the very same purpose. 3. Affordable Rental Housing. The private sector does it better and they do it free of public subsidy. The problem is the Planning allow the private sector to yet, on the other hand they Department. They do not provide affordable housing; are willing to further dl- 141 ~/lI}- - 3 - bankrupt our nation, state and local governments by providing low-rent housing with public money. This is the basic flaw in this proposed project and it must be addressed at the City Council level to change their thinking that a private non-profit corporation such as SBCS, Inc. can do a better job with public money than the private sector can do free of public subsidy. This faulty thinking has emerged with the power of the Planning Department. This planning department has no thought of cooperating with the private sector, which has a better understanding of the demographics of the area and the need for low-rent housing. Public subsidies never work and the Planning Department must be educated to see the rror of their thinking. The duties of the Planning Department should be to plan for current conditions not decree a utopia, which is only wishful thinking on the part of bureaucrats who are pro- tecting their jobs by their continued stranglehold upon the residents of Chula Vista. Synergy with Transtional Housing Rebuttal: The South Bay Community Services, Inc, lowered property values when they purchased 17 4th Avenue in 1992. They are compounding the problem by attempting to add 31 4th Avenue to their use. The adjacent property owners of Parcel Map 127, Lots 1, 2, 5 6 and 7 have spent millions of dollars on developing their property. These two owners have followed all guide- lines of the Planning Department with regard to off-street parking, fire hydrants, fire department turn-arounds, street lights and handicapped curbs. The proposal at 31 4th Avenue does none of the above. They are leeching upon the backs of private property which must adhere to a different set of guidelines. This is simply NOT FAIR to the taxpaying neighbors to down-grade the value of their property by authorizing substandard housing use in the SAME BLOCK; NOT ONCE BUT TWICE. If 31 4th Avenue were rented by SBeS, Inc. from the prenent owner for their purposes, it would not be so bad; but to authorize a SALE means this type of housing (or worse) is being encouraged in a neighborhood where adjacent property owners are attempting to up-grade to CJ /- J~d-- -II t ~ - 4 - make a profit on their investment. The SBCS, Inc. has no thought of what they are doing to their neighbors. They did not even disclose their plans to anyone prior to obtaining $1,000,000 from the City Council to purchase 31 4th Avenue. It seems only reasonable that the SBCS, Inc. and the City Council as well has an obligation to notify the adjacent neighbors (at least the owners of lots 1, 2 5, 6 and 7 of Parcel Map 127) before even thinking of making a study of lots 3 and 4 of Parcel Map 127. Financing: Rebuttal: SBCS, Inc. has no money of its own. They rely solely upon public subsidy of one sort of another for the purchase of 17 4th Avenue and 31 4th Avenue and will continue for the life of the prooperty to depend upon more and more public subsidy. Where will this mopey come from in light of the shortage of money at all levels of government. The City Council should be cutting its spending; not adding more agencies for it to support. In fact, a brief perusal of this proposal proves the entire project is NOT ECONOMICALLY FEASIBLE. It is a complete waste of taxpayers' money for the little good it does. There is NO EVIDENCE it will do any good. Please look at the last paragraph on page 3: Given the size of the national deficit and the national pressure to "cut spending first" and add programs later, it is very doubtful that money will be available after 1993. Furthermore, there is no indication that any money set aside should be spent on this wasteful proposition. Any prudent person would realize that investing 2 million dollars of taxpayers' money to purchase 17 4th Avenue and 31 4th Avenue is ill advised, given the mood of the country to stop the flow of taxpayers' money into the hands of an Agency which survives upon public subsidy, such as SBCS, Inc. With no money available to fund the continued use of this program, the purchase of the property is futile. c9-1-1L.[3 -II tt- - 5 - Even as I write this, President Clinton is speaking on the television, reporting to the nation that the Co~gress is going to limit welfare to two years. This type of federal legislation will send a clear message to the poor and to the agencies which set themselves up to help them that the gravy train is over. All poor people and all social workers will be forced to re-train themselves to become self-supporting, tax- paying citizens because the working class can no longer afford to support people who refuse to engage ip productive labor. A new, rather spurious, program such as is being proposed will be the first to go. The Planning Commission should realize that this proposal is out-dated and therefore, the request for zoning change should be denied, based upon the national good. Kathryn Lembo does not address the cost of remodeling 31 4th Avenue. Yet, she intends to add the cost of removing all kitchens to turn them into bedroom in addition to installing two larger kitchens. To bring them up to code would be VERY COSTLY. Who is going to pay for this? Who is going to pay for restoring the apartment house to its original use once the welfare state ceases and working, productive America takes its rightful place? $750,000 is an Jxcessive price to pay for 31 4th Avenue, an aging delapidated building. It has not been maintained by its present owners, who naturally are delighted to turn it over to Kathryn Lembo at inflated price. This building is VERY OVER PRICED. Once, the economy recovers and the homeless disappear, who is going to accept the loss on the sale of this building? Kathryn Lembo, in her report, makes it seem everything is rosy. She shows her lack of expertise in the knowledge of real estate and what it really takes to keep it going. Futhermore, Kathryn Lembo does not mention that 17 4th Avenue and 31 4th Avenue can only be reached via permission to enter and exit across a PRIVATELY HELD recorded easement. She can't change that. Nor does the planning department disclose the presence of this easement access. The map they mailed out does not show the easement or the conditions of its use. When I reported it to them, they did not change their map. J II '-1Z( -/1-.0 - - 6 - But, in my experience, that is the way the Planning Department operates. If anyone points out to them something they do not wish to hear, they ignore you--never answer your letters or your telephone calls. A property owner simply does not exist unless it is time for you to follow one of their rules or to pay one of their fees. The over-crowded conditions (20 people more than the Housing Code allows) will lead to more traffic congestion on the very inadequate parking spaces behind 31 th Avenue. 4th Avenue is is already overcrowded and is a very dangerous traffic situation because traffic coming down 4th Avenue from D Street goes down the 4th Avenue hill into the valley and unsuspecting motorists will not be aware of school buses double parked to board and un board school children residing at 31 4th Avenue. Kathryn Lembo, like the Chula Vista Planning Department, completely ignores this unpleasant condition in favor of saying there is a park across the street. She also ignores are small children are going to cross a busy street to get to the park. It must be stressed that Kathryn Lembo suppressed the truth when she said "there is very little opposition". She attempted to sneak this through without notifying the adjacent owners, who are vehemently against Ms. Lembo lowering their property values with her proposed project. There is VERY LITTLE opportunity for the adjacent property owners to make their case. My impression of ALL OF THE HEARINGS I have attended at the Planning Department and at the City Council is to make it appear that you are being listened to. Subsequently, this department and this city council suits themselves. At both of the hearings called by Kathryn Lembo, the opposition was limited to three minutes and any attempt to continue to present the opposing view was met with such statements as "you are out of order". Kathryn Lembo made it quite clear that we could talk three minutes, no more, and that it didn't make any difference to her what was said during that three minutes period because she was quite vocal that "this was a done deal" and any opposition might just as well sit down and shut up. It was very shocking to me to learn that our elected officials, the Mayor and the Members of the City Council, do not protect the public interest. It is quite apparent that the majority of the Council have already approved this proposal prior to any public input. It is quite apparent that Kathryn Lembo thinks the proposal will be passed because she is blithly .sJ 1-/4) -I ?-I / - 7 - going ahead with her plans. at her two meetings that she by July I, 1993. She told.all in attendance intended to be in operation It makes me wonder how this form of government in Chula Vista originated. It reminds me of other governments who made the rules, administered the rules and ruled upon any opposition (un- favorably, of course). It makes me wonder what happened to the Democracy called the United States of America. It makes me wonder if anyone reading this letter will understand what I am saying. It makes me wonder if anyone reading this letter has the will, the knowledge, the power and the authority to act in the public interest and put a stop to the sale of 31 4th Avenue. All efforts to assist the SBCS, Inc. to find a more suitable a cheaper and a more appropriate location for the proposal has fallen upon deaf ears. It seems, now, all depends upon the wisdom of the Planning Commission. I hope and pray that the members of this Commission will read my words and the words of the other property owners and assist us in preserving our community by denying this conditional use permit. It seems like a very unfair and unwieldly process that only the Planning Commission can take responsibility for denying an ill-conceived and economically unfeastible proposal. The opposition should have been heard BEFORE AND NOT AFTER FUNDS WERE VOTED BY THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL AT A COUNCIL MEETING AT 1;15 in the morning. Who could have been there to oppose? It may be assumed, that should this proposal be passed, against all reasonable judgment, based upon such considerations such as the true ownership of this property not being disclosed, that Kathryn Lembo refuses to address legitimate complaints but will treat adjacent property owners with the same disdain she is showing Mr. and Mrs. Leo Wood living next door to Case Nuestra, that the opposing neighbors will have no more recourse. I can close by saying Kathryn Lembo glasses when she wrote this report. tend to be dreamers. wore her rose colored But, social workers The world needs dreamers. ~I /' I~l{i ~ I ?-~ -- ! - 8 - But, when a City Council has authorized the expenditure of public funds, and will have to continue the authorization of public funds to keep this homeless drop house operating, these public servants must make hard choices based upon good business practices and must look at the good OF ALL OF THE COMMUNITY, not just the well being of a handful of 50 people. Since the City Council has already approved this project, there is little liklihood of their changing their minds unless the Planning Commission takes on its shoulders the burdens which should have been shouldered by our elected officials, in that they did not listen to the communities point of view prior to accepting the proposal by voting the funds. I Hope that Planning Commission will think independently of the Mayor and the City Council will consider all sides. I hope the Planning Commission will consider the damage to the neighborhood as well as the burden upon the sources of public funds to keep this drop house operating and balance this against the very little bit of good the operation of this drop house for homeless will do. I hope the Planning Commission that 31 4th Avenue IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO HELPING 50 HOMELESS AT A TIME. I hope the Planning Commission will deny this Conditional Use Permit Application with the recommendation that Kathryn Lembo accept the many offers of the community to help her find a more suitable location for her project. There is NO COMMUNITY OPPOSITION to helping the homeless. No one is opposed to that. But, in the expenditure of your money and my money, the project must be economically feasible and the location should be transitory in nature so that the project can be audited every three months to determine that the tax dollars being spent are actually being spent to help those in need. Again, THERE IS NO NEED TO PURCHASE REAL ESTATE FOR Kathryn's project to function. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 420-3869 Note to the Commission: I have invited the Mayor and the City Council and I have II" 01 .-/17- _1~3/ - 9 - invited the Planning Director and his staff to visit me at my low-rent housing complex at 21 4th Avenue, Chula Vista. Not one person has ever come or ever acknowledged that I existed. That is typical of the treatment of taxpayers by the Council and the Planning Department. Ignore you unless they want something from you. Therefore, I would like to invite the Planning Commission to visit me at the Villa Vista Apartments at the above address. I will be happy to show you a well-run asset to the City of Chula Vista. This complex could serve as the means for all in charge of planning and housing to serve as a model for the many poor people residing in Chula Vista, a very small percentage of which Kathryn Lembo states she will help. is My point/if 50 people are deserving of help, why not help them all: cc: Hart Klein Mayor Tim Nader Mayor of National City Councilman Ron Morrison, National City d\ -/48 .--pA--- June 17, 1993 Response to the letter of Martin Miller, Associate Planner and GENERAL LETTER TO MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION: It is ratherf~~ghtening to read in the San Diego Union that the City Council has voted $1,000,000 just to purchase 31 4th Ave., as a drop house for the homeless. It is rather puzzling because just last year the Planning Department refused me the right ro build low-rent housing at 21 4th Avenue, though I have operated low-rent housing at that address for 40 years. I was told "Chula Vista does not want low-rent housing, it wants moderate income housing". As the paperwork on the purchase of 31 4th Avenue emerges, I become even more frightened. In Kathryn's Lembo's report, upon which the City Council based its decision to buy and 'subsequently fund 31 4th Avenue (forever, I guess), Kathryn stated: "Management of the short-term housing is a critical issue. We will hire an experienced property management firm and involve residents and neighbors in the management process". Now, how do you suppOse she is going to do that when the neighbors are adamently opposed to what Kathryn is doing? Who is going to pay the experienced property management firm? That doesn't sound cheap. What will Kathryn be doing? Thinking up another scheme to get control of more property at taxpayersr expense? "Another .1IIlajor advantage is that neighbors expressed very little opposition to the transitonal housing project nexh door. This is critical since community opposition is frequently a major obstacle to siting homeless housing facilities." Kathryn neglected to say that there was very little oppo- sition to the transitional housing because she did not tell anybody what she was doing. No conditional use permit was required and the neighbors were not notified. We WERE NOT ALLOWED BY YOUR ADMINITRATIVE PROCEDURAL PROCESS to object. When we went to the Hearing, we were "boo'd and hissed" by Kathrynd~? contrived audience who were in favor of spending $750,000 to buy 17 4th Avenue and vest title in Kathryn's name. c;} -111 -/ ~ ,').5 , - 2 - Unofficially, I have addressed more than 50 letters to the Mayor and the City Council and to the Planning Department. I have vigorously objected to the City's high handed way of preventing the private sector from building low-rent housing, while on the other hand, the City Council votes $750,000 of public money to buy 17 4th Avenue in 1992 and the now $1,000,000 to buy 31 4th Avenue --all for low-rent housing. Apparently, the policy of the Council is not to allow low-rent housing unless they spend public money to buy it and then they give it to the South Bay Community Services, Inc, which after all, has no money whatsoever of their own. What else can I do to get your attention?~ Most letters, practically all letters, are not ever answered. But, my letter of May 29, 1993, was answered by Martin Miller, in which he invited me to submit written evidence against this project. I am accepting his invitation. Ail I can do is call to your attention the self-serving, in-complete and inaccurate (if not false) statements by Kathryn Lembo in her report of Feb. 8, 1993. This one-sided report apparently was the basis for voting for funding the purchase of 31 4th Avenue, prior to any public notice. NOW IT IS UP TO THE NEIGHBORS to point out the falsehoods in the report, the economic unfeasibility of the project, the lack of need in the community for a homeless drop house, the waste of taxpayers' money and the unfairness in treatment of identical property between the private sector property and a small, private non-profit agency, with NO EXPERIENCE in the housing field. For some reason the City Council has favored the tax spenders with no experience over the taxpayers with decades of experience to get the same job done. The Planning Department through its regulations has banned low-rent housing, thereby creating an artificial need. To fill the need, the City Council throws away millions of dollars on projects dreamed up by a lady whose interest seems to be to get title to valuable proper~ wi thou t paying for it .m:4tr:sf!llf. C)} -/07) _ I ;LIP - - 3 - Kathryn Lembo admits she took three years to put together her project. The problem is that ecnonomic times have changed since she started in 1989. The mood of the country is to reduce the deficit first by cutting spending, rather than to fund new, innovative programs such as this one. Furthermore, Kathryn Lembo is a talented grant writer, but she does not understand the economic circum- stqnces of the people she is purported to serve. Any man out of work, with a wife, who does not work and his two children can apply for FDIC and in a matter of days receive $800 per month. All he has to do is ask. To give out this cash money is much cheaper than to buy two buildings for $2,000,000 and continue to fund their up-keep and the food maintenance as Kathryn is attempting to do. Her plan sounds good on paper, but her plan is not economically feasible. The 50 or so people she attempts to help can get more service and more money elsewhere just by applying. So, in reality, there is no need for Kathryn's program unless she goes out and drums up people who are willing to take something for nothing. Kathryn's idea might have been able to fly had not the worse recession since the great depression took over our country and dried up federal funds for such a spurious program as Kathryn is suggesting. She might be able to get the money to purchase these buildings, but where will she obtain the money to remodel them, bring them up to code and where will she get the money to maintain the buildings and the people living in them for the many years to come. Kathryn has not thought through these problems and therefore she left these pertinent items out of her proposal. In fact, Kathryn's proposal is obsolete and serves no useful purpose other than to obtain for herself title to two side-by-side delapidated buildings which she hopes she can con someone into maintaining for her. d-I -J;R ,I :J/1~ - 4 - If Chula Vista needs low-rent housing, all you have to do is clean out the bureaucracy in the Planning Department let free economics flow. You will have all you need and Kathryn Lembo will be out looking for a job. The staff of the Planning Depoartment seems to think it is all right for them 1. to restrict the size of unit 2. to design ugly buildings such as the one they designed at 21 4th Avenue, Units 1-8 3. to change their minds so that the 14 units at 21 4th Avenue are ill-designed, built in the wrong place and do not serve market conditions. 4. All my complaints are met with a glazed look like I had just arrived from Mars. This may be my last opportunity to contact someone with averagQ intelligence who has the power and the authority 1. to reduce the ridiculous requirements of the Planning Department. 2. to force the City Council to stop throwing money at a problem which they themselves have created through lack of knowledge of market conditions and mismanagement. If the American people do not stand up and halt the flow of regulations, our country will be governed by takers and not doers. I don't know who will pay the bills after all small businesses have been forced out of business by regula- tions and taxation. I have never met anyone on the Planning Commission, but I hope and pray you are not part of the Mayor and the City Coijncil and their henchmen, the Planning Department. I hope you are an independent body who will support the people who live and work in Chula Vista. I hope you will think for yourself when you read the attached rebuttal to the proposal on South Bay Community Services, inc. dated Feb. 8, 1993. ~ ; . _1?-9~ d I ~I s;o2- - 5 - I assume I am speaking to a group of individuals who think for themselves rather than mindlessly following bueaucratic regulations, set up in part to raise funds with which to run the City. I would like to quote from Robert Brom, the thoughtful Roman Catholic bishop, who believes that in the absence of any sense of civic identity, the migrants from every- where who make up San Diego have clung to their own civic and social fantasies and mistake them for what's really going on here.: "As a result, he mused the other day, "rugged old American individualism flourishes. You come from here, you come from there, you do your thing, you can have this. Individ- ualism is canonized. But individual rights and privileges must take note of the community reality." I would be the first in line to give up my individualism and my fantasy, if I thought for even a minute that what Kathryn Lembo is proposing would even do half as well as I have done during the past 40 years in housing the poor and the transients. I know Parcel Map 127 in Chula Vista better than anyone alive. I grew up on the property when Chula Vista was known for it's gentlemen farmers as owners of lemon groves. I subdivided Parcel Map 127 myself when these two lots were zoned R-4 and Commercial on 3rd Avenue. The 6 acres have been largely undeveloped because of the poor economic conditions in Chula Vista in the past 50 years have not made development economically feasible. The higher class people have migrated from Chula Vista and have been replaced to a large extent by spanish speaking poor. No one knows this better than I because I have personally managed low-rent housing at 21 4th Avenue since the 50's. At least 90% of our tenancy is Spanish surname and while they want attractive housing, they are mainly concerned with affordable housing, which I have provided for them. It hurts me deeply that the Mayor and the City Council are attempting to put me out of business at a time when I can begin to develop this vacant land. There is no point in thinking any person would rent either the apartments or the offices if the rents are more than the $400-$500 range. Yet, the City which prevent of the area. Planning Department has rules and regulations me from building according to the demographics c7 { - 1S:3- .-I~.q/ - 6 - I could accept their decisions in the hope that possibly they are correct (even in the face of all indications that Chula Vista is going down a little each year) and hang on a little longer, hoping to make a profit on my land--instead of just breaking even as I have done for so many years because I own the land. But, it hurts me deeply when the same City Council now recognizes what I have been trying to tell them for the past three years, thattb~~~ is need for affordable housing in Chula Vista. But, the way they are attempting to supply this affordable housing offends me deeply. To take money from tax funds here and there (federal, state local, etc.) and buy two delapidated apartment buildings at 25% above market value and give them to the South Bay Community Services, Inc. a private non-profit community services corporation, free and clear, and to provide the money from tax funds to up-grade them into habitable housing and then to fund their operation for as long as this corporation needs funds to do what they are doing defies all sense of logic. Apparently, the Mayor and the City Council read the report by Kathryn Lembo dated Feb. 8, 1993, and took what was printed in that report as the gospel truth and decided to alleviate the shortage of affordable housing by this very EXPENSIVE ROUTE. I don't know what motivates the Mayor and tyhe City Council. But, I do know what motivates Kathryn Lembo. She is a professional grant writer who makes up her dynasty by requesting public funds to serve the poor. This type of band-aid approach is very self-destructive. In my opinion, a better approach. to allow the private sector to build the housing so badly needed in Chula Vista. _.~.:: _.::- would be low-rent Motivated by the profit motive, the private sector will enforce reasonable rules and regulations which puts the responsibility upon the poor to at least do something to help themselves, instead of relying upon Coalition members, including Lutheran Social Services, the Chula Vista Literacy Term, and the MAAC Project to shore them up. While these agencies, including the South Bay Community Services, Inc., may be good organizations, they give the poor the idea they can get what they need for nothing; d) { ~/r;'1 /y/ ...... - 7 - instead of teaching them the American way--to work hard, save your money and get ahead a little at a time. Anyone who gets married and has a family should assume the responsibility for their actions and make the conscious decision to support that family and raise them in time-honored American principles of thrift and hard work. There is nothing wrong with those principles. They always worked for American before and they will work again, if the Mayor and the City Council will please just step out of the way and allow these economic principles to act. For the Mayor and the City Council to think they can make a better Chula Vista by throwing away public money in th~ hope they can solve the problems of their city is wishful thinking. Chula Vista will become a welfare state instead the thriving business community it used to be. It might not hurt for you to consider what Bishop Brom has stated that individual rights and privileges must take note of the community reality. These rights and privileges work both ways. If the poor in Chula Vista think that the Mayor and the City Council will take care of them, then who, may I ask, is going to pay the bill? You and me? I cannot help but think that charity should be a privilege and an optional choice and that it should not become mandatory as the presently elected officials think. There is not a businessman among them. I assume, the group to whom I am addressing this letter, is an assorment of people who live and work in Chula Vista. If my assumption is correct, then all of you--or most of you--will come to the conclusion that I am right. You will come to the conclusion that to grant a conditional use permit to transitional and short-term housing on a Parcel Map where the other five land owners have been paying taxes and tr,ing to stay in business is A TRAVESTY ON JUSTICE. The following pages address specifically the mis-statements in the report upon which the Mayor and the City Council voted $1,000,000 of your money and my money to just COMMENCE operation of a short-term housing project for just 50 people. This project is so expensive, so ill-advised--so poorly thought out, that I cannot imagine any reasonable person voting for it. _1'3//' d 1-/!5{)-- Regina Hickey - 8 - But, when a City Council has authorized the expenditure of public funds, and will have to continue the authorization of public funds to keep this homeless drop house operating, these public servants must make hard choices based upon good business practices and must look at the good OF ALL OF THE COMMUNITY, not just the well being of a handful of 50 people. Since the City Council has already approved this project, there is little liklihood of their changing their minds unless the Planning Commission takes on its shoulders the burdens which should have been shouldered by our elected officials, in that they did not listen to the communities point of view prior to accepting the proposal by voting the funds. I Hope that Planning Commission will think independently of the Mayor and the City Council will consider all sides. I hope the Planning Commission will consider the damage to the neighborhood as well as the burden upon the sources of public funds to keep this drop house operating and balance this against the very little bit of good the operation of this drop house for homeless will do. I hope the Planning Commission that 31 4th Avenue IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO HELPIXG 50 HOMELESS AT A TIME. I hope the Planning Commission will deny this Conditional Use Permit Application with the recommendation that Kathryn Lembo accept the many offers of the community to help her find a more suitable location for her project. There is NO COMMUNITY OPPOSITION to helping the homeless. No one is opposed to that. But, in the expenditure of your money and my money, the project must be economically feasible and the location should be transitory in nature so that the project can be audited every three months to determine that the tax dollars being spent are actually being spent to help those in need. Again, THERE IS NO NEED TO PURCHASE REAL ESTATE FOR Kathryn's project to function. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 420-3869 Note to the Commission: I have invited the Mayor and the City Council and I have dl-/~~ ~17~/ - 9 - invited the Planning Director and his staff to visit me at my low-rent housing complex at 21 4th Avenue, Chula Vista. Not one person has ever come or ever acknowledged that I existed. That is typical of the treatment of taxpayers by the Council and the Planning Department. Ignore you unless they want something from you. Therefore, I would like to invite the Planning Commission to visit me at the Villa Vista Apartments at the above address. I will be happy to show you a well-run asset to the City of Chula Vista. This complex could serve as the means for all in charge of planning and housing to serve as a model for the many poor people residing in Chula Vista, a very small percentage of which Kathryn Lembo states she will help. is My point/if 50 people are deserving of help, why not help them all: cc: Hart Klein ~layor Tim Nader Mayor of National City Councilman Ron Morrison, National City dl -f~7 ~ I =33 - r 335 Kimball Ter. " Chula Vista. Ca. June 16, 1993 J'j, Planning Commission City of Chula Vista, Ca. Gentlemen, I am opposing the granting of a conditional use permit for the South Bay Community Services short term facility (homeless shelter) at 31 ~th'Ave., Chula Vista. I am writing not only for myself but, also, for the residents of the surrounding community. I am enclosing petitions signed" by these residents who oppose this transient hotel. If this shelter is established it will set a dangerous precedent. It will be a cancer that will grow. How can you say "no" to future agencies that will want to wstablish themselves on neighbo.ring property, if you say "yes" now? I am enclosing a rebuttal to this housing which details the problems. ' I am also enclosing copies of newspaper articles that paint out some of the problems. I re8vectfullY ask that you read this material and search your conscience. Zoning was established for the protection of the majority of the citizens, not for the interest of a very small number of people and an agency which is a private corporation. Please vote "NO" and save our city from urban decay. Sincerely, -LY~ r! d~~ ,~ d I r.58 ._ 131 ' Planning Commission City of Chula Vista Gentlemen. I am a long term resident of this area. I have lived on the north side of Chula Vista for over 70 years. I speak, not only for myself, but for the majority of residents of this area who oppose the granting of a conditional use permit for the South Bay Community Services short term facility(homeless shelter) . I am not against helping the homeless. My professiQnal career was spent helping dysfunctional people. As a student at San Diego State College, I worked as a student aide for the County Welfare Dept. Later, I was a full time worker for the Welfare Dept. My first teaching assignment for San Diego City Schools was at the Detention Home for delinquent youth. Later, I taught children with emotional and learning problems at Balboa and Logan schools. However, I do not feel that )1 4th Jo ve. is the proper place for a homeless shelter. Directly East and West of 4th Jove. is primarily R-l residence,. occupied by many elderly people who have Ii ved in their homes for many years. On 4th J..ve. well maintained apartments and Town Houses are occupied by tax paying citizens and OWners. many of who are seniors. To put the homeless. )O%of whom will be from National City into our community will endanger our safety and welfare. If this shelter is established it will set a dangerous precedent. It will be a cancer that will spread. How can you say "no" to future agencies that may want to establish themselves on neighboring property, if you say "yes" now? Do you want North Chula Vista to become the homeless capital of the county? I cite " the recent experience of Ramona . Ramona had only a small homeless population of two people when the shelter was established. The news of this small shelter attracted migrant workers and chronic street people from other areas of the county. Transient-related crimes increased after the first year the shelter operated. Many of these new residents filled their days drunk on the streets or in the doorways of businesses." This is a qote from Brenda II .".. Foreman in Letters to the Edltor, San Dlego Unlon. d I - Ibti / _('85" .; If the city of Chula Vista feels they must establish a homeless shelter, why not do as San Diego has done and zone a area where homeless shelters may be established. As a planning commission, you could zone an area in the warehouse or commercial area in South Chula Vista as far trom residences as possible. Are South Bay Community Services equipped to manage a shelter? They have had no experience with transient housimg other than a small house for up to 8 runaway youths. After talking to neighbors of this house, I found there were plenty of problems there. ~ave attended two meetings in which this agenC~eXPlained their plans which are full of "loopholes" and are naive and simplistic. I quote" Management is a critical issue. We will hire an experienced property management firm and involve residents and neighbors in the management process". This quotation was taken from the initial letter dated Feb. 8, 1993 to the City Counci~equesting funds to buy the apartment house at 31 4th Ave. Chula Vista. Now the problem..Profess-- ional Real Estate Management firms select tenants, collect rents and oversee maintenance and repairs, but who is going to be "on site" to control 50 dYsfunctional people liVing in small communal quarters? T he residents? The neighbors? I can forsee problems..... Again I quote: "Nei ther program is for drug addicts or the mentally ill." When questioned at the meeting about how they were go- ing to determine who was a drug addict, the response was: "we'll ask them and have them sign a paper" What?? No drug test? There is no provision to check for criminal behavior. Will potential child abusers, rapists, burglars be mixed in this communal living? If not actually living in the house will there be boy friends visiting their women'or hanging around the neighborhood? Who is going to monitor this? The neighbors? The agency stated that only Chula Vista families and )0% from National City will be admitted. Anyone can give a Chula Vista address. No check on this??? It was stated by the agency that by law they may not inquire into a person's citizenship. Will this shelter become a safe house for illegals? ,;/-1 - /CtO /)~h/ The stated purpose of this shelter is to train people independent living, job training and referral health care, etc. Who is going to give the job training? How much training can be ~iven in 8 weeks? Are jobs available? If the vocational training in our high schools, Southwestern College, private training schools, the education program of County Welfare Dept. has not been success full in training these people how can this agency expect to help in 8 weeks? Health care. Medicaid and other health agencies already have this covered. Counseling. The only person you can change is yourself. All the talk in the world is not going to change these people , unlass they want to change. Many of these problems are unso~ble. 8 weeks of this agencies help will only waste over a million dollar-s of taxpayer money. Is this agency going into this project to obtain a free apartment house they will later turn into low cost housing? We know that while tenants pay a low rent, the federal government subsidizes the rent so the landlord receives a fair rent. Is this agency going into this project to pay their overhead--rent of their offices and the salaries of their 41 employees? This agency is not trained or qualified to manage a homeless shelter. Let them continue their work with troubled youth. This agency has not always told the truth. ~roPosal sent to the City Council on Feb. 8, 1993 states. "Another major advantage is that neighbors expressed very little opposition to the transitional housing next door. This is critical since community opposition is frequently a major obstacle to homeless housing facilities". Of couse we d!dn't oppose it, since we were never informed of it. ~read an article in the San Diego Union on March 25, 1993 which outlined the plan. My neighbors said "What is this?" I replied, "I don't know, but I'll find out." South Bay Community Services went behind our back to get the city council to vote re-development fundscto buy two apartment houses to be vested in their name. They didn't tell any of the neighbors about it. How could we protest? I have petitions siglned by the vast majority of citizens owning property or residing in this area protesting this homeless shelter. WE ARE PROTESTING. d--1-1fR/ '1~/ ./1 5' In conclusion ~urge you to vote"no'to a conditional use permit for )1 4th Ave. Zoning was established for the protection of the maj- ority of the citizens. not for the interest of a very small number of people and an agency which is a privare corporation. Please vote 'NO" and save our city from urban decay. Berni ta Sipan 420-2698 .;) { - /0d-- ?q" , -I . . 'k;;, Su.r-News, Sall.ll'day-SWlday, Marth 6-7,199) .Price also hidden in homeless plan They're "hidden," they're homeless and : some people with big hearts want $700,000 : from the cityofChula Vista to help them. . According to city officials, between 350 : and 500 people in the South Bay are home- : less. Orthose, about 60 percent or between . 210 and 300 don't live on the street but have : no permanent address. Instead they live in : motels or with relatives. : To ease their plight, South Bay Commun- : ity Services has a plan to acquire a 50-bed, : 14-unit temporary housing facility at 31 : Fourth Ave. The big problem with the plan, : however, is that the homeless aren't the only : "hiddens" here. "The money it will cost to : open the center is hard to see as well. . In addition to the $700,000 from Chula : Vista, shelter boosters want another : $300,000 from National City in order to . cover start-up costs for the first year. Then they plan to ask for $47,000 per year in operating costs from Chula Vista and an- other $20,000 from National City, for five . years. The social service agency is also applying : for $200,000 from the federal government : and $100,000 from the state in emergency : shelter grants, and considering a $100,000 fund-raising campaign. . Then there's the matter of the $650,000 in : Chula Vista's Community Development , Block Grant Funds in order to subsidize rent : for tenants, who, it can be assumed, could : only afford minimal amounts. Although the : money ultimately comes from the federal : government, that figure is about half of d-J~ /LP..3 what the city gets all year, and goes to a var- iety ofactivities. Add up all of those funding sources (as- suming boosters would get it a11- a highly unlikely event), plus the $15,000 in pre- development grants the group has already taken in and the tally for start-up costs comes in at about $2.25 million. That works out to roughly $45,000 per bed - a figure that lends new meanmg to the term "king size," And what happens when the shelter closes down due to lack of fund- ing after two or three years? There is no doubt the South Bay needs to do more for its homeless population. Curren- tly there are only eight beds in the area to serve the homeless. All are at Casa Nuestra, which only serves runaway youth and is constantly full. And the homeless population is expected to grow in coming years as nearly 900 eJdst- ing affordable units are being eyed for demo- lition or at risk of losing subsidies. But surely there must be a less expensive way to provide shelter_ At any rate, local city governments are currently in no condition to take on extra fi. nancial commitments, especially ones that would no doubt grow year after year. It's never easy to say no to someone in need, whether you can see them or not. The City Council will be in full public view when it considers this request March 9. But the council should not be considered hard- hearted when it respectfully turns this pricey plan down. 3q/ ./1 2-. __~'.--""'7'" . . n<.- '''' . ~ \,: iIti ....ihl~'tIr.' ~: ......._ r...tI'- ._. .. ~ ,. '. J ' . ' ~ ;. '..,......~;.,.- '---1oIinI . .....111 II..... "-'..- March t ~, i .,UclillIllt _ _tbe.", A~""true , ~_lIllt.d ....tMtIIIP"...... to. 1o-ecre lite 1m the " . - .llaII>>- II bad ClIIIy IImall h...-' JllPJl-tinn of .tJlSl DeDDIe wbIm the 1bcJler"" w.t.. JiIIlig.1be~.t- ::~ ~-- ~ UMltY. In ~y'seconomY, 1101';--. owners ill RamoI'B are holding on to their bner- -~ by a &'tlIId. T~!,.uent-related criJnel! in- ~ after the fint ~ tbe Shelter lIP" . . Many Of tbeae new residliiUa filled ~ysdruDkonthe~gtinthe ~bU,p- r- retuied only to take care of more than its abare cI. the Iv"l""-. p0pu- lation of San Diego County. St. ViIlceDt de Paul Village's big<ity . pco&ranl didn't work ill a small unincor- . panted ~ We did the right thing by benmnl ioKetbet to uy thanks, but no thanks, to St. Vmcent de Paul's p(OIlOI8l for a ~ sbe\ter 10 arouIY out of pr0- portion to Ramona's size. {The role of large sbe1ters !DWIt be rea&- aessed u to wbetber theY are a free ride for many, wbiIe be1ping a few. Each com- JIIUIIity needs' small sbe\ter and mea- ames to make sure theY wor\L SbeIterS shouIa be for thole without. means of IIlIPIlOrt who oeed propma to beIp cure \he problem. DOt treat \he I)'IIIIItOD1lL BRENDA FOREMAN ..- ~wants homeless out III DIep =eat b~ss owners, COIl- te lbOUt area's image bave decided to hire UIlIrIl1ed :.e.. curity I'W'1Ia to push the home- Ieaa aomeplace else. r.. "It'sjust gotten to the point where it cIoea scare people Iway , ssicI David Cohn, a member of ~ Hi11creat Association board. "Some of it, maybe, is uncalled for, but I can teU you from person- al experience that there are some real waaos out there who are real scary.' Myron Lester, co-owner of Preferred Security Service, I stsrt-up firm that will provide the foot and bicycle patrols part time ~or ~ ~~tha sal pilot pr~ ject, ssicI.lt will be I kinder, gen- tler servu:e. "We don't just want to come in and be bouncers," be ssicI. "We . want to come in and try to provide an alternative.' Leater said be was I consultant f~ ~ ~ that provided similar secunty services to the ~ Quarter Association ear- year. "What'l bappelled is we pushed them out of the Gulamp the best we could,' be said. "But now theY're ltarting to filter do here." wn PluI Hippaka of the Home1eSll Ilaearcb Project, which ia Itudy- iIlg ways to NIp be-'-o people \ wbo are meDtaIIy ill. calla it the. . "tlaIIooD effect. ~ \ "YOlIIq'IIH - ~ aide and It .,..._...~..be IUd. :..,' I n 10<<: .... ~ '" , _.- - _.. . ,?/ --Itr! /ltD/ March 25, 199J Members of the City Council, We respectfully request that you reconsider opening a homeless shelter at 41 Fourth Ave. Chula vista. We are property owners and residents of the two block area surrounding the proposed shelter. We feel this shelter is incompatible with the present land usage in North Chula Vista. It will lower our property values and the safe use of our homes. While the stated purpose of the shelter is for families, we feel that it will lure homeless men into our community. Many of these men are"spaced out" on drugs or alcohol and are a distinct danger to surrounding residents. The maintenance of the shelter will put a burden on the tax payers of Chula Vista. }..'shel ter that draws people from National City, S; Diego. etc. is not to the best interests of Chula Vista taxpayers and" ts. _2<<fj~t;b.Mj.k-'#.~--(jt:~/9/ _______ _~Q.f!k~dl:-~-'e.i.J-I:{?./f/[ 3.~?L::'~#.A?dp--1f~<e----- . ~:t ~ l:C?.~e..t.._a:[. _ _ 3 Jl1-tD_ - - --- 2r1_~~~~--~--~Lj1ct_-_--- __g?-. _~Lf& e L _ cL__ _Y..L 3... LlJ_ --- __ ~ _3 _ _ G 16. JL(~L _ _ _ _(It:1-!.3 - - -- _taCZ~02(/.e.e--Q~\lFJ!..r./2L c:.. b:,--- - ~fl:.,.j!.,___qLqLQ- _t._ _CL:;-f!.Jt..-9Jfl.tcL_-- _2~__G~_9~ri._.c..3="-c.-I)--~-~3 1 \ r- -- 1;, - / -- --1/l- ~~J?r~~- - -~tJ-~.:fr CfI.9/-; _L.. ~___ _2.riJ._J)JLA4UJLLl1:-I3:v--CJ1U- _~- _ _ ;;,({;;._________ 1.t._~!.L:.-i'--t;:.~d!.1!P..---- ---~~--. -~....:-.-0 '--.--.- ------ ---- -~...1~.-7;y:--;~!J~-g.j-~.{/lffD ___ _ __~------- __~sfj____~~~L'~~--tL------ y ~; ( .1_"" I '.") . <; iJ+ J~1 { , ___ j'~19~L-j~- J~~_______:! _~_2~--~-Sji~~. ~~ ~~JL~_ --{.::';JJI,~7i' - - ___~~-~-J?Qj)~st- .!!'~l1j~z(() :,;;) I - I t..P5 __ ) t..f?- - March 25, 1993 Members of the City Council. We respectfully request that you reconsider opening a homeless shelter at 41 Fourth ~Ye. Chula Vista. We are property owners and residents of the two block area surrounding the proposed shelter. We feel this shelter is incompatible with the present land usage in North Chula Vista. It will lower our property values and the safe use of our homes. While the stated purpose of the shelter is for families, we feel that it will lure homeless men into our community. Many of these men are"spaced out" on drugs or alcohol and are a distinct danger to surrounding residents. The maintenance of the shelter will put a burden on the tax payers of Chula Vista. ~.-shel ter that draws people from National City. San Diego. etc. is not to the best interests of Chula Vista taxpayers and residents. . g.__~~rd?~~ .3_3S-K~-~~ e, /Y5,l;- -- -r;Jl~(~ f!:?~- __LY_J7-k-L'!:l/?J-LL--,!:t;!::.---~y / ~_ ______.y-.!.-!. _7JK4~ -~-'t.--J~rttl?e.rfJJ/,( M. _ L_L_. -=1.<-0<. " _____ _.{J2.f-A:;:"-v:r-,fu".!L./t-11!:'UJiJ--:...--- -----~~-r----- - -J-~_'f--&;.~~!',:r:~-ot'-I{,- _~___ ______________ ~~~__fG~~-~~~--~l-J----- lk_ ___ _ __________ ~~~~-~-~:J:. l~CK!__ _ __ke~i?.___~J_1__ 7!".2 L I:t.t1:! P.fU L ~-t!&:..t:: tL / -~').;?l-?r;:Ln~~-~ .-7 1fY' __. /1.-?/- =3~/~t;;/~-:;:/#Lr _.2LLs:.M~].h...~:tf@.'- -~ JJ --- ~le'~JfJ/~Q.Y..--~~Q:QJ ~ _t.~ _ ~1;f..I.bt!-~1';Jt.~~d!.g'-<i 7'7 -:3J.s:-~t{1-~~~ .3.1~Kitt1ioJf~.c..e.-C..V-9./.;2/o 3L~di:!,~~1:2 .c.e..t:J/..t}./g./o ~/ -/(0 (R -It? / ~~~ ~~ ,JUNE 10, 1993J ~~. ~.e' --h~ c:;, a 0 ~lAYOR/CITY COUNCIL..~1EMBEF:S AND F'L.~\NNING COMMISSIONERS - ____________._____.__._______...._.___.__...__.____.___._.___._______________~__ ~C7_~~""-. - Q~~T:':: ~~ ~52--<';:f WE RESF'ECTFULLY REOUEST THAT YOU RECONSID~R AF'F'ROVAL OF A "FAMtLY r HOMELESS SHEL.TEF:" AT 31 4TH AVH1UE. CHUL.A VISTA. THE FACILITY WILL HOUSE AN AVERAGE OF 433 HOMEL.ESS PEOPLE PER YEAR. SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES, A NO~~PR[WIT CORPORAT10N. WILL OWN AND RUN THIS FACILITV. SBCS ESTIMATES THAT IT WILL COST $160,000 A YEAR TO PROVIDE FREE BOARD, MEALS, BUS TOKENS, CHILD CARE AND OTHER . -. . ASSISTANCE TO THE HOMEL.ESS. THE $1,036,000 CAPITAL. EXPENDITURE T~ PURCHASE AND RENOVATE THE 14-UNIT BUIL.DING IS A WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY. IN THIS DECL.INING REAL. ESTATE MARKET WE CAN SPEND OUR MONEY MUCH MORE WISELY. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED. FEEL. THE PROPOSED SHELTER IS TOO EXPENSIVE AND NOT COMPATIBL.E WITH lHE PRESENT LAND USAGE IN NORTH CHULA VISTA. WE ARE CONCERNED lHAT THIS SHELTER WILL LURE MORE HOME- LESS TO THE NEIGHBORHDUD. EUCAL.TYPTUS PARK AND THE COMMERCIAL AREA IS AL.READY A HANGOUT FOR MANY HOMELESS. AN ADDITIONAL 433 HOMEL.ESS PER YEAR WILL. NOT IMPROVE THE AREA AND WILL IMPACT THE L.OCAL PARKS AND SCHOOLS WHICH ARE ALREADY CROWDED. IN CL.OSING. WE ALSO FEEL THIS CENTER WILL. DRAW PEOPLE FROM NATIONAL CITY, SAN VSIDRO, SAN DIEGO, AND IMPERIAL BEACH. THIS . Nor IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHUL.A VISTA. 1./i<dAd.~/~ - ----l~-9.~-i-.~~~~1_-(!.-U--~. 9/ q / c ~LL;;e;;;; .....mmm_ _._jJj9._:__~i~___tb..~~jl.~__t.:.X;_~. 9/9 IC -4d7d~J;1;~_: __/:,,~z~~I,,~_4~_:__:.,;~_l~hjLMtti- 9/7 Ie) --B _m__' t_______________ ____(t~-m---~~~~-~_:;~!~.t<f f'/h, __L'1_m_____.l.f11TpL_I.>-____U____~___el/. ?( '11. J-i~----!:/d-~--~(L--e.(J!~--r/1ICJ _LY/-____t':.~~_~~__t!:.!:!.._f:.~~_ '7/ '} I 0 ____L'f_L__'f:flr.__AJJ._~.!_./i!,L-~-I{-~J 11<[ r.d _L'il_____'1_~~_____+.L~_~_'__C.v....~lJ__') q 10 ~4~~ __',._~_!__ __I~__~_:___if!.~_~--df-F..--~_~---iL7 /0 ~~~_ . _ _ m_ J~<:J___~~-avQ..-~-~LC-\LB..L9..1.O --~-~~4A'd(-. iIf3__~~.LlH-~~2__~t!.._q{'tLQ' ~/7l{.~ .F!3.4../'t.ck..vT"ft.:;J::'J!.'lL'lYP . - --~---- 't'I . --rB..d.kc.~""'_~.!!__~ q)" _~'--__ ___'___ .______._m__ ._-"- J _ I q l -- .;;2/-/h5 March 25, 1993 Members of the City Council, We respectfully request that you reconsider opening a homeless shelter at 41 Fourth Ave. Chula vista. We are property owners and residents of the two block area surrounding the proposed shelter. We feel this shelter is incompatible with the present land usage in North Chula Vista. It will lower our property values and the safe use of our homes. While the stated purpose of the shelter is for families. we feel that it will lure homeless men into our community. Many of these men are"spaced out" on drugs or alcohol and are a distinct danger to surrounding residents. The maintenance of the shelter will put a burden on the tax payers of Chula Vista. A"shelter that draws people from National City, San Diego, . etc. is not to the best interests of Chula Vista taxpayers and r~~de~ j ';r:;? J .... 7 -!J!.v::.------6-.~'!-::.:.fi- ~~____-L ",,2/f..t_~~.Ei?1~.-c;:..-~~~"[CJ./o '(A., g__, /, '"", ' "!,,' '0')'''' J.' .. if ,.1. ,l t.1 __..J_ .,,_~__'-=-'::::_~~J. .,!'..L/-____ ~.J.:ri:..I'J__~::_'c_~l..:k_'___~~_..:___'_,_:.._~_ _ _-'~~ __ 4.;;~~- ______ j_~,L_C;'_C~""(f:1C_ft:!iLZ.-r.1- ",-_fl' (&I ___ " _.f?. 1..J2.!if--------- .3.~lJ_~-~..~y~--~l'!:'O __ ~ ___~ ________ ~~:tJ0:~~_~l~_~t~~~~~ _ _fu}_ ___ ..~~______ _3jL.J)--~T--~-\!f}~~-~-'!.illQ -4JAC---~~~zI~;.-- __2~~:.3il~~~-:t.:<.!--~-f:~---. ;$;~~:~/ _._~~Z{f~-----h-- --;;{---f;j-1:t-t~~:.:-{~J-?!: ~~~~ -- --~- --------~-------------------- 4~/~ 7' -'~~~------- __Z..z:A_-;.__~~~~<l--::-([.:.'L::-~.LL ~~~____________ __1S:_J1U~_Az[~~_L~__4_~~_Qd_ _F. l:e&l. _ ~_~{!..;j.______________ __!.i'..__~:!r-W<k-_-I!'--L1----gL-&.:- _ ~ _~~---------- __~~Jd-#=-/ri?-~-.I!uf~.<--- ~_~_i~~~---------------- _~_~~jf~1--6!f!-~d~---- v'~- }w.~- ------ _~f'.._~__::_~_t!:. _'a_(_f-...{.k. ~---- ------------------------------- --------------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------------------- ----------------------~-------- -------------------------------- =============================== ==========================~=l~L} / d- t -lit 4' March 25. 1993 reconsider vista. We are residents and. or. property owners in the city of Chula Vista.. We feel that this shelter is incomatible with the present land usage in North Chula Vista..It will lower our property values and the safe usage of our homes. While the stated purpose of this shelter is for families. we FEEL TH.AT IT WILL LURE homeless men into our community. Many of these men are "spaced out " on drugs or alcohol and are a distinct danger to surrounding residents. The maintenance of the shelter will put a burden on taxpayers of Chula Vista. 4shelter that draws people 1s not to the best interests of the city Council. We respectfully opening a homeless shelter at 41 request that you Fourth Ave., Chula Members of --- from National City. San Diego. etc. . Chula Vista taxpayers and residents. Name ~v-.. \(on'".,. L lIL1JdV1-su hI"? C L (MolER 1'/,4 h'J< no.b~tt-r b.Lress L,s~ ~U^ \\~I, Sf -tFJ, ( /\ ~J; ILfl, (A JA.!,d 4ve. (~'ujr1/;:v'ci. {;t tJAlcJ . q\C,!O '!} <I oIJ.( L. II kj,'J O;v/" V.I/'1 Ie' ". - CJ;.j I 'i ': b :1'~".L/jJ"! ,lJ I~U;'" jIw, CA- 1'/1/0 _ ;J 7 t 9 "u ~ ('~- CJ 'J . .k 1.- 17/ J ~,~ , _ / 7 () , <; ;; / )',- '" , CtlU-,C :it f}I'\.-'''- 31-1/ 1(1/,~I.)(UI '(('((rUe (jiu./v.. (jIS{Zl Cft Illqli ~:~f',~'~_ ~":~ ~ !'1:,~~: ~~; tv h IL. (f~ j' i' J. ,- C zo; ..:...t.. IU. t!: rT l. w.... V...;t;: , I ~ l~ :dj./;;~ thr L/ {'jJ'If~f]lwJ ,2PS-1lLtw-H -IF tit {!(<L~,-- Viilt , c:, J 7tuv~:f dlLw /3"~/~+ _^ Ie c. t. 1/...<!t:L~ .c~- V~. CLef '(II 9~L- ~:/--'>1.P/.! JJ:(5 ?",ln1!,L~ (~I,h..v (; 1/ - '1l-fl! ) J </ ~/-/w~ - , 12'j 1;'lU:"M4'\' crilO, v/::71l l'4....."r0J I ILl r 1-1 Ct/( t: 'c /1 r.J - Cl.(1.11 C. 1/ c; ,.r, 1/ JUNE 10, 199:3 MAYOR/CITY COUNCILMEMBERS AND PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ----------------------.----------.--------------------- WE RESPECTFULLY F,EQUEST THI'IT YOU RECONSIDER APPROVAL OF A "FAMILY HOMELESS SHEL TEF(" ?IT 31 4TH AVL,NUE. CHULA VISTA. THE FACILITY WILL HOUSE AN AVERAGE OF '133 HOMELESS PEOPLE pER YEAR. SOUTH BAY COMMUN I TY SERV ICES. A 1~(]N'+'f;:[)F IT CORPl1F<AT I ON. WILL OWN AND RUN THIS FACILITY. SBCS ESTIMATES THAT IT WILL COST $160,000 A YEAR TO PROVIDE FREE BOARD, MEALS. BUS TOKENS, CHILD CARE AND OTHER ASSISTANCE TO THE HOMELESS. THE "0:[,0:,,6,0;)0 CAPITAL EXpENDITURE TO PURCHASE AND RENOVATE THE 14-U~IIT BUIL.DING IS A WASTE OF TAXPAYER MONEY. IN THIS DECLINING REAL ESTATE MARKET WE CAN SPEND OUR MONEY MUCH MOr~E WISELY. WE, THE UNDERSIGNED. FEEL lHE PROPOSED SHELTER IS TOO EXpENSIVE AND NOT COMPATIBLE WITH T~E PRESENT LAND USAGE IN NORTH CHULA VISTA. WE ARE CO~~ERNED lHAT THIS SHELTER WILL LURE MORE HOME- LESS TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. EUCALTYPTUS PARK AND THE COMMERCIAL AREA IS ALRE('IDY A H~\NGOUT FOR M('IhIY H(J~lEU::SS. AN ADD I T IONAl 433 HOMELESS PER YEAR WILL ~~T IMPROVE THE AREA AND WILL IMPACT THE LOCAL PAFWS ~ND SCHOOLS WHICH ARE ALREADY CROWDED. IN CLOSING. WE ALSO FEEL T~IS CENTER WILL DRAW PEOPLE FROM NATIONAL CITY. SAN YSIDRO. SAN DIEGO, AND IMPERIAL BEACH. THIS IS NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF CHULA VISTA. ~"'-'-( .o::_h~~;.____ / kL~~T ..~1..~.~------~~------ ~--.-.--.. .-..- .-....- -.-.. -..- .....-.- ... -..-... ... .... ....7...... ..... --.. .-..-..-. ..-- .....- .--~..- ----.- -.---.------. _~.~:.(6~~:Y::.<.e/vJ .-.LI'3..:~:.!'.:..~..~)--L.t~.--.~.-.~~-.C-- ._ . ._.__ua.j... ..Lz/J2... . ..._...ilIJ2t!d~.___._)/. ....h=\..=~S.9 11- .Q.~-~~-<2.C;Vi:>.--- .__/ .$..L.__ _ 'i'''''''.--.K.k-it/'i----------- --~.~ -.-[~L..-:...-tJi~-~Ik----~L---- - . -,-- -. -'-~ A_.__ ----~-~---~~r/- "/bQ. .t1:.~~-J2a:_.-~lC.--- _1..0 -~.~~4~(kd-~<-~..:'- ...(~.~~._~~--~.~-- jt.I_-:f2_....~_~~__CCLf:!..~__ /.70 ,- ~'~ Cr. --_.__.._---~------------- . - )~ /p ,. .9-1-- 1& g 6 South Bay Pentecostal Church 4th &t -D" Streets. Chula Vista. CA 91910 P.O. Box 390444 . San Diego, CA 92139 Telephone' (619) 585-0600 P/lI;wr IIrllwr E. HWl{es, m Honorable Mayor Tim Nador 276 4~h Avenue Chula Vis~a, CA 9191U June 14, 1993 RE: PR01'OSJ::U SHORT-TERM SHELTER PROJECT. Mr. M..yor: We here at South Bay Pentecostal Church would like to go on record in support of the Short-term shelter proposed by the South 5ay community Services. I understand it is to locate at 31 !'ourth Avenue, in Chula Vista, just a very short distance from Ul$. Arter having spoken with Mr. Dan Marcus of the Community Services, and with yourself, we think the few concerns that we had at first have been very adequately addressed and that plans ace in place to operate the facility in a manner that will result in the meeting of a need and in no way be an undo liability to the communlLy. Please forward our letter of support to the proper Department so that as plans are considered and made, it will be clearly understood that ou~' voice is in the affirmative. Thank you very much! ve~;r;; yours, ~YL~ - Kev. Arthur~HOdgeS III I>:llltor rPJf---.'. r'" . ..;.... -- <) r;; !: '." ' ! ~ ~: -- . . ' ~ ~ ~ -. . I ::. ! I ' ' r- . , . - --_: -- --6~"'__'l""_"'" -----..-' .....-....--...--- A..,lslant llro. (;ro~e Nobb. Operations Reo. '/myMRnhRtI Bvanll"U.m 'Ibm Vurnura Youth ku. /chn Lopn c91 ~/~1 3 ~ I~f) , JUN 08 -93 13:32 HRRT KLEIN 619578121- TO: P01 w.'n~ n'",e/: , 0Ir.".r.__ PJeSS9 el,Qci(, 'J". betor.. :~" .. rft a~~ ;0.: JUNE 8.19'7::. CITY OF CHULA VISTA BOll LEITEF<- DIRECTor, PLANNING DEF'I..RTMENT 276 FOURTH AVE. CHULA VISTA. CA 9j911) RE. SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVIC;t:~S AF'PLICATION FOR CONDIT IONAL u(;E FERMI 'r. ENV IF'ONMENTAL REVIEW INITIAL STUDY, Jj FOURTH AVENUE. DEAR 11,<. LEITER: OUF, REVIEW OF THE .. INI HAL STUDY" Sf-lOWED THAT MOST DEPARTMENTS ASKED TO COMMENT ON THIS PROJECT GAVE IT A VERY QUICK REVIEW INDEED. T'HE DEADLINE TO RI::Sf'ONSE WAS INDC!;I) VERY SHOR'r. WE, THE NEIGHBORS, cIND IT VERY DI~IJI,BING THAT lHE IMPACT ON SCHOOLS, PARKING, TRAcFIC, SAFETY, USE OF EA~lc;NT, ETC. WERE TREATED VERY LIGHTLY BY ALL CONCERNED. IF APPROVED, THIS PROJECT WILL BE VERY VISIBLE AND SHOULD BE IMPLEMENTED WITH THE GREA1E~H CAF'E. WITHOUT DETAILED PLANNING AND NE I GHBORHOOD I NVOL VIoM"-NT. TH I 5 I::DULD BE A REAL EYESORE AND PROE<LEM FOR THE CITY. SOUTH GAY CDMMUI'IITY SERVH_ES AND THE CITY OC CHULA VISTA HAVE BEEN WORf.':ING ON THIS PROJECT FOR MANY MONTHS. IN TURN, WE THE NEIGHEIORS HAVE HAD VERY LITTLE nt-I!; TO RESPOND TO THE INITIAL REVIEW AND WILL HAVE LESS TIME TO ADDf<ESS CONCt::RNS WITH THE .. COND 1 TI ONAL USE I"EF<M IT" . SINCE THE STAFF REF'Dln 15 I'JO! DUE F'lJR AWHILE, WE WILL EcE UNDER THE GUN TO CHALLENGE ITEMS AND AT THE SAME TIME GET READY cOR THE F'LANNING COl1MISSION MEETlNG ON JUNE ::n. 1993. OUR ATTORNEY IS NOW (IN VACATION AND .JlLL NOT BE AVA1LASLE TO PREPARE IJUR CASE WITHIN THIS 'riME FRAME. IHIS TYPE OF MA.JClR LAND USE (;t,ANGE SHOULD BE STUDIf:"D PROPERLY AND NOT RUSHE.D THROUGH THE, "ROCESS. FOR WHATEVER REASON THIS PROJECT Is ON A VERY FAST TRACK. WE ARE ASKING FOR A REASONAE<LE PERIOD OF TIME TO RESF'OND TO THIS PROJECT J:lEING PROPOSED IN OUR Nf:"IGHBORHOOO. WE HAVE SEIH MANY LETTER~ '10 TI'IE MAYOR AND COUNCIL STATING MANY OF OUR CONCERNS. WE HAVE HAD ZERO RESPONSE. IT IS TIME THAT THE NEIGHfCOR5, TAXf"~YERS, AND VIHf.::r,S ARE PROVIDED AN EQUAL OPF'ORTUNIl'Y TO REVIEW AND STUDY 'THIS PROJECT WITHOUT SUCH TIGHT DEADLINES. ONE ADDITICJN("L MUNTH SEEI"1S FAIR TO PUT OUR ACT TOGETHER. WE ASK YOUR COOPERI'lTlON TO RIo!;r.:t,F,DLILE THE PI. ANNING COMMISSIoN PUBLIC HEARING TO SOMETlME IN LATE JULY OR EARI_Y AUGUST. SINCERELY, d I -/ ':{-r[) \-'b\L ~\-\~'"t" <;. \t~ ,,...I 5\C6-')"l,"'l't. ~ _1{ / Cc.. ~ ~~v~'?-c:Q\"'~o~" t,rrotL,-. I 1 June 6, 1993 Mr. Chris Salomone Director, Community Development Dept. City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Salomone: re: Letter from Kathryn Lembo, Executive Director, South Bay Community Services, Inc., dated February 9, 1993 ,.. Judging from your title, I assume ~ are a public servant hired by the City of Chula Vista to serve the citizens of Chula Vista and therefore have no vested interest in South Bay Community Services, Inc. I hereby request that your agency withhold ALL FUNDS from the above agency until there is a legal, public hearing to investigate the false claims in the above report, not limited to, but specifically in protest to the following: Page 2: Under Operations - "Management of the short-term housing is a critical issue. We will hire an experienced property management firm and involve residents and neighbors in the management process." 31 4th Avenue is Parcel 3 of Subdivision Map 127. I own Parcell,S, 6 and 7 of that subdivision. I had never met or heard of Kathryn Lembo on February 8, 1993, and how dare she intimate I would be in favor of anything she is doing or that I would do anything but oppose her? Furthermore, Mr. Hart Klein owns Parcel 2 of Subdivision Map 127 and he, too, is vehemently opposed to what Kathryn Lembo is proposing. How dare she tell you that she will cooperate with Mr. Klein, who is doing everything he legally can to block the purchase of 31 4th Avenue. Page 3: 31 Fourth Street Specifics .;2/ ~{ J-( , ~q -- . . - 2 - "Besides being adjacent to transitional hOusing,----" I challenge Kathryn Lembo to prove in a court of law that my property consisting of 2.2 acres or the property of Hart Klein at 45-47-49 4th Avenue, Chula Vista, is 'tran~~tional housing. Between the two of use we have invested more than 2 million dollars im improving our property, in additiona:l to ,,! filling all planning department requirements with regard to parking, fire department turn-arounds, -size of units etc. In addition we have fulfilled city requiements with regard to fire hydrants, handicapped curbs, Street lights, etc. How dare Kathryn Lembo call our property transit1Dn~1 housing when we have not only purchased our property at great cost but have up-graded it recently at great expense? The anI y pe r son s:t1'lfZ,,,-.s'tit-,n::g tha t 31 4 th A v en u e bed own - g r a ded is Kathryn Lembo and she does not tell the truth. Furthermore, "Another major advantage is that neighbors expressed very little opposition to the transitional housing project next door. This is critical since community opposition is frequently a major obstacle to siting homeless housing facilities." Neither Hart Klein nor myself had met Kathry Lembo on February 8, 1993. How dare Kathryn Lembo make such a false statementf Hart Klein and myself are waiting for an opportunity to present hard, factual evidence that 31 4th Avenue as a transitional housing center is economically unfeasible, not appropriate for the n~ghborhood, that i~ is c~D~rling 50 people into 10 1 BR units which is 20 more people than the housing code allows, the location is unsafe as 10 people have been injured in front of 31 4th Avenue in the past 10 years, there is inadequate parking, -there is no fire department turn-around, the property is run-down and the purchase price is at least 25% more than the current market. Now, that at least the above falsehood have been brought to your attention, I insist that you call a community ..2 J - / 7d-- SO' ~I - 3 - . immediately, IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, so that the neighbors can present their evidence at a public hearing that Kathryn Lembo has applied for funds from your agency UNDER FALSE PRETENSE. I don't know what the legal penalties are for falsifying reports, but whatever they are the neighbors of 31 ~th Avenue are adam~ntly requesting that these legal penalties be enforced to the maximum. Please let me know the date of your PUBL[C INQUIRY HEARING so that Mr. Klein and myself can attend with our Attorneys and our evidence. We would likoeibo pros~cute Kathryn Lembo to the full extent of the law. Will you please, in the interest of all of the citizens of Chula Vista, whom you represent, withhold any and all funds from South Bay Community Services, Inc. until a full investigation can be held and a resolution be forthcoming. To do less, would be a violation of the trust by the citizens of Chula Vista who hired you and pay your salary. Please let me know the date of your hearing. Sincerely yours, Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 cc: Hart Klein Bernita Sipan Mayor Tim Nader Councilman Leonard Moore Councilman Jerry Rindone Councilman Shirley Horton Councilman Robert Fox Planning Director Bob Leiter Kathryn Lembo, South Bay Community Services, Inc. David Harris, Redevelopment Office Mayor of National City Councilman Ron Morrison, National City .;21-{73 ,{l/ ~ ~ -;1- q3 IC LJ~'.k Arla.y ~~ce.._.' 'i.) y (, : ' ,. ~ ~ Q C,.c?tCQ.(~ ~ ~ lM C.A. u.J)o.. vl..4i"a., --P a..-m ~ ~~ ~ dJ.. f !-""<1~a-o...v-.~ ~ 7 <<lid; , l.M ~)(. 'to ~ ~'" . 13u.....Q~ 0.. ~ ~ ~d ~ a cJ..d;;ttt~ -Q, ~ ~ CLM..ct ~ o..cRo( ~ ~(. ~".;f- ~, j ~ .Dt~ ~ d.rv.A. 'tr Qct~ dO u..~d. ~ ~ ~tl.ff-c{ -Q, <L-A 0'-0- ~ 'b> -ct<.J. ~'"" ~ ~ r-c~ ~ ~ ~~d ~~. j) ~~ ~~ ~ /lQ ~Cl.:b. ~ ~ ~cttc-r. '6 C-. ~ ~ I ..Q-6 ~ ~Q4._J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ug-tllt ~ ~ ~ -tt..i ~. ~~ AAiDR.~ ~r'))e: n~ I~q f (. ~(/.k tJl~ e-J . CfriVIM.LlO C~ ((3tH'L (80s) <fq ( ~ 3S"'3o d I ~ /</-<1 ~:f/ I~ --- r-...~ _. r;. ' May 29, 1993 JU;v(; b lC2'. u, ," Planning Commission of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 PLAt!r . \/\';.'. Case No's: PCC-93-39/lS-93-36 In response to your Notice of Proposed mitigated Negative Negative Declaration dated May 26, 1993 on the above case, I would respectfully request that you consider my response to the Planning Department, a copy of which is enclosed, be considered a challenge to this Mitigated Negative Declaration or conditional use permit, as this ill-conceived proposal will surely end up in court and I do not wish to lose any of my constitutional rights because of my ignorance of your ADMINISTRAtIVE PROCEDURES. Everyone of the issues I raised in this enclosed response to the Planning Department should be preserved for me should a positive approval ~s given by whatever Agency approves such silly proposals. Furthermore, the South Bay Community Services, Inc. is in violation of their Conditional Use Permit at 1515 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista. I challenge the Planning Department that they are not heeding the complaints of the next door neighbor, Mr. and Mrs. Leo Wood at 1525 Hilltop Drive, as their conditional use permit provides that neighbors will not disturbed. I wish to preserve my constitutional rights to present evidence of the above violati?n at 1515 Hilltop Drive, should a Court case develop, as evidence that the South Bay Community Services, Inc. is not capable of handling 8 teen-agers let alone 50 homeless. I wish at this point to enter whatever is necessary to prove my points in court and I do not wish to be limited by you or anyone else. At the hearings to date, each speaker has been limited to 2 or 3 minutes. This length of time is not sufficient to bring to the attention of the Planning Commission the danger to human life, the financial loss on the part of adjacent property owners, thee~~nomic unfeasibility of the proposed project and the unwillingness of the South Bay Community Services, Inc. to allow the community to seek out and find a more suitable location for their transitional housing. 02 /-/::}5- {~V ,.1 - 2 - I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the City Council voted funds in the amount of $720,000 at a Council meeting at 1:00 a. m. in the morning. This vote came before the surrounding neighbors were notified of the plans for 31 4th Avenue. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing th~ the City Council, after hearing complaints at a Council meeting about granting $150,000 to the South Bay Community Services for additional expenses in connection witha~~~d~~m~ 31 4th Avenue, title to be vested in their name, the City Council at the next meeting removed the $150,000 from the South Bay Community Services, Inc. and tacked it on to funds being allocated to the Otay Lighting District, the $150,000 going to South Bay Community Services, Inc. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Hayor and City Council and the Planning Department as well as the South Bay Community Services, Inc. acted ca~ritiously in entering into an agreement to contribute funds for 31 4th Avenue, title to be vested in South Bay Community Services, Inc. without first giving adjacent property owners the chance to voice their opinions. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that adjacent property owners will be severely damaged should the City Council approve the proposed transitional housing at 31 4th Avenue and that I should be guaranteed the legal right to ask for damages from the Chula Vista City Council as well as from South Bay Community Services, Inc. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the City of Chula Vista and the Planning Department did not give me sufficient advice and notice, should it be considered that I am in default of any of their administrative rules. I hereby request thar the Planning Department and the Chula Vista Planning Commission advise me of my consti- tutional rights to raise ALL OF THE ISSUES which would bring about a NEGATIVE RESPONSE TO THIS PROPOSAL. I am anxiouk7awaiting and expect to receive written instructions from the person or persons in charge of the ways in which I ~3Y bring up all of the issues dl-IT~ ~' _, - 3 - against this proposal. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista refused my request to build low-rent housing at 21 4th Avwnue, Parcel I, Parcel Map 12~. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Chula Vista City Council has voted funds to purchase 17 4th Avenue, Parcel 4, Parcel Map 127, for low rent housing, Hud to pay 60% of the rent. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the Chula Vista City Council has voted funds to purchase 31 4th Avenue, Parcel 3, Parcel Map 127, for transitional housing for the homeless. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into ~evidence in a Court Hearing that my constitutional rights have been violated when a public agency, such as the South Bay Community Services, Inc. be given public funds to provide low rent housing when the private sector is denied this right on the very same Parcel Map--side-by-side locations. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that my constitutional rights have been violated when a public agency, with no housing experience, be favored over me, a private sector low-rent housing provider with 40 years of experience in the City of Chula Vista; In the event, at the public hearing each and everyone of these points are not adequately presented to the Planning Department at their Hearing on May 23, 1993. I would like to preserve my constitutional rights that I be allowed to present into evidence in a Court Hearing that the passage of a conditional use permit for 31 4th Avenue, Chula Vista, as a short term shelter for the homeless is a dangerous location for the residents therein and against the public interest. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 cc: Hart Klein Bernita Sipan r" I {) .;)/-/7-7- ./ 0--t... "-- ,- C~'<...) .j . ' May 12 " ... Application for a cnm:fi't::L-o:noal use permit for 31 4th Avenue should be denied because applicant is attempting to use the private property surrounding 31 4th Avenue for her per- sonal use. Applicant is attempting to interject commercial use in an R-4 zone, which is already dangerously overcrowded because when #17, #31 and #45-49 were built the planning department's requirements were one parking space per unit. As you know, your experience has led you to upgrade your requirements to one and one-half to one on all new and up- graded buildings. Lots 7 & 8 of Quartersection 136 were subdivided according to Parcel Mmp 127. 21 4th Avenue is Parcel I, 45-49 is Parcel 2, 31 4th Avenue is Parcel 3 and #17 is Parcel 4. The map mailed out by Doug Reid is incorrect because it does not show the easement which allows access to parcel 2, 3 and 4 to the parking areas behind their buildings. Title to the easement was retained by the owner of Zl 4th Ave. #17 has rights of egress and ingress to its parking area, 31 has rights of egress and ingress to its parking area. The rights of 31 4th Avenue end right there. 31 4th Avenue has no right to the turn aroun~ provided at 21 4th Avenue or at 47 4th Ave. This is private property and if these two owners do not exercise their legal right to keep all occupants of 31 4th Avenue off their property, then the owners stand a very good chance of being sued for negli- gence in the event of a law suit arising from the operation of a "transitional 60 day time limited housing" at #31 4th. In other words, 31 4th Avenue is landlocked and their parking spaces will be limited to those they can fit into their 100 feet of land. Nothing over and above this. #31 4th Avenue has made no provision for the zd hammerhead turn-around re- quired by the fire department and other emergency vehicles and it questionable if they have space enough to provide one. In this inadequate space of one parking space per units, the proposed "limited housing" will have to fit delivery trucks bringing in food, they have to fit in at least two sanitainers to service their housing, they will have to provide parking for school buses to load and unload the children, they will have to provide parking. for TV trucks, SDG & E trucks and telephone trucks. Since the easement is limited by deed to ingress and egress there can be no parking in the easement. This equipment is for the access of the fire truck and other emergency ~ I :.-/-=rtf /' l{&'- - 2 - equipment and for the exclusive use of the 42 families who live beyond in a land-locked situation at 45-47-49 4th Avenue. Furthermore more, the p~rkiug spaces behind 31 4th Avenue are so narrow that a large van such as a Suburban, a trash truck, a delivery truck a service truck, etc. cannot back out ~f the parking space into the 20' easement and turn around to head out. These large vehicles will have to back out of their parking space, back out against incoming traffic across the easement behind 17 4th Avenue and will head into a planter strip installed to divide traffic going into and coming out of 21 4th Avenue. Since the planter strip prevents them from turning around, these large vehicles will have to turn the corner and back out to 4th Avenue against the on-coming traffic. When these large vehicles reach 4th Avenue, they have no place to turn around and they will have to back onto 4th Avenue against on-coming traffic in order to turn their vehicle facing the traffic in the right direction. As the~ownet:~Of'21-4tl-A.eriue and the owner of all pri~ate'dr~vew~js~oncF.r~~l Map 127, I have already faced a similar situation a few years ago when the owner of the 17 4th Avenue building, in attempt to earn a reasonable return on his investment, leased his facilities to a half way house for cancer patients who were receiving drastic diet treatment for the arrest of their cancer. The delivery trucks and "- the increased traffic for the change from ordinary 1-4 activities to a "semi-commercial" (such as the "transitional housing" will be were faced)w't~ faced with the same situation the applicant will face; that is the delivery trucks could not turn around on my property because I would not let them. The owner solved the problem by removing all land- scaping in the rear of his building and install a concrete turn-around behind the puilding so that these trucks could cross over the incoming traffic and reach the out-going traffic lane in order to face in the right direction. The applicant might be able to do something similar if two parking spaces were reserved for large vehicles and a concrete driveway was built between the two buildings so that the large vehicles could pull far enough so that they could back across in the incoming traffic to reach the out-going traffic lane in order to face in the right direction to reach 4th Avenue. Of course, the spaces for the two sanitainers would {f) ~ ...-1 .d- (- 7-1 - ~ - take two spaces and the concrete tur~ around would take two spaces in addition would encroach upon the only area the children of the homelss would have to play in the evenings and on week-ends and holidays when they were not cared for by the applicant. The applicant admitted that she would not care for the children at the above times. After all South Bay Community Services. Inc, is an office. They are not care-givers but contract their intended care out to others who do not attempt to give 24 hour care. They tend to be open only during regular school house. The parking situation on 4th Avenue is worse and not better. The City has painted red the curb from the fire plug in front of 17 4th Avenue to the corner of 4th and C Streets. This leaves parking spaces on the curb in front of lots 2, 3, and 4 of Parcel Map 127 which amount to 12 or 13 spaces for the 84 families who now occupy the apartment buildings on the above lots. Since the private parking behind these three buildings is already woefully inadequate, according to current standards of the planning department, the over- flow must park on the street. This is public parking and may not be reserved for anyone of the above parcels--first come; first served. These spaces may be available, or may not be and cannot be counted as parking for the increased use of 31 4th Avenue. When the school buses draw up to load and unload the homeless children, they will have to park in the traffic lane if parking is not available in front of 31 4th Avenue. If the concrete turn-around is build behind 31 4th Avenue, the buses could, of course, pull right up to the building on the concrete pad provided and the children could then board the buses with safety. The problem with this plan is that there then would be absolutely no place for the children to play unless the parents of the children walk them down to the light at the intersection of 4th and C Streets, cross them across the street and stay at the park with them while they play so that they can escort them safely back to the transitional housing. Another alternative which might come to mind is parking spaces might be leased from Land of China &- { - US'V (6' ./1 - :4 - Restaurant. If the homeless just park in the spaces provided by Land of China Restaurant, this business will be faced with the same legal problem which I faced. If parking is permitted and not legally prohibited, then Land of China Restaurant stands to be sued for any occurrence on their property arising from the operation of the transitional house at 31 4th Avenue. That, of course, is up to them. It is possible they will be willing to donate parking to the transitional house. The other alternative would be for the City to donate additional parking to the transitional house at the park across the street. The homeless and their children could safely cross at the traffic light at 4th and C Streets and walk the short distance to their transitional housing. So much for the inadequate parking at 31 4th Avenue. It may be that Mayor Tim Nader is so in favor of this housing that he will work out one of the above solutions to insufficient parking. The other problem is safety. Considering 31 4th Avenue is on a hill and approaching traffic leading north on 4th Avenue is travelling at a high speed because there is no stop light at the corner of 4th and D Streets. This speeding traffic is TOTALLY UNAWARE OF STOPPED SCHOOL BUSES or residents of 31 4th Avenue who might be jaywalking across 4th Avenue in an effort to find a short cut to the park. In the past 10 years, 9 people have been injured in front of 31 4th Avenue, pertaining to the traffic on 4th Avenue. This statistic was provided by the Manager of 31 4th Avenue, who has lived there for 12 years. Currently, there are 2 children living at 31 4th Avenue. In order for the applicant's plan to work, she will be forced to increase the number of children being exposed to these traffic hazards. If there is an accident, then the applicant will be morally and legally responsible, especially in view of this written report reporting all the traffic and parking conditions which exist and will exist upon the approval of this application. There is no access for the handicapped. There is no curb cut in front of 31 4th Avenue. The only accessible one is the one I installed at my driveway leading into 21 4th Avenue. ,;;?1-(i?'1 ~\~.... - 5 - Another issue I would like to bring to your attention is serious overcrowding of -the 31 4th Avenue as a transi- tional housing. There is currently two two-bedroom units and 10 one bedroom units. I haven't been provided with a copy of the plan to remodel 31 4th Avenue, but I understand the two bedroom units will be remodeled into kitchen and community areas. Using the standard of safe housing used by apartment builders today, the limit is two people per bedroom plus one. Using arithmetic, 10 one bedroom units would provide sleeping accommodations for two ,,' adults and one child for a total of 30 occupants. The double standard used by the planning department and the city council will allow 50 people in an area that the current standard limits to 30 people. The apartment owne~ around 31 4th Avenue conform to the standard but applicant apparently does not plan to conform but will crowd in 20 extra children (persumab1y) because they will live there for only 60 days. I get a little tired of this double standard. I am required by the planning department to follow the letter of the law, but all around me are serious infractions on the part of property owners and business owners because they have the favor of the City Council (or whatever reason the infractions are allowed). I hope I have provided you with sufficient irrefutable evidence that the project proposed by applicant has serious and fatal flaws which will lead to a negative recommendation on the part of the Environmental Review Section of the Planning Department. I hope I do not see one more example of favoritism on the part of an agency which should apply the law fair and equally to all applicants. Regina Hickey 21 4th Avenue Chu1a Vista CA 91910 420-3869 cc: Mayor and the City Council Hart Klein Bernita Sipan Land of China Restaurant Chu1a Vista Fire Chief IP D ,.. /1 dl-/fZ , .- .- ~ Ft,.:1 r . r: , .', c..' Jqg, ~ v '-'.1 1:: k__~' ' May 19, 1993 Martin Miller Associate Planner 276 4th Ave Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Miller: As you know, South Bay Community Services will be administering the program that will provide a Short Term Housing Facility at 31 Fourth Avenue in Chula vista. Some residents have suggested that this program will increase crime and calls for police service at this location and the adjacent area. In my professional opinion, this will not occur, and in fact, we may actual see a decrease for police services once this program is in place. My opinion is based on the fact that I served as Chief of Police in Chula Vista from 1965 until my retirement in 1991. During that time, the Chula vista Police Department and South Bay Community Services worked very closely together on several programs involving families and youth in the South Bay. During the period 1981 through 1991 I served as a member of the South Bay Community Services (SBCS) Board of Directors including two terms as President of the Board. I have personal knowledge of the fact that SBCS has an excellent record of achievement with a variety of projects, many of which have significantly enhanced the community. In summary, I am confident that South Bay Community Services will do a very effective job in administering this Short Time Housing Project, and it will not have an adverse effect on crime or calls for Police service. Sincerely, 'II), 1/ I I!/G(ill>..}, U.;~~ WillJ.am. . W~nters Retired hief of Police /pI.... /1 o1r-{ fi3 STAFF CORRESPONDENCE TO REGINA mCKEY,HART KLEIN AND ATTORNEY PAUL ROBINSON ...J I - ( F!-I ....1 /p{).- / ~(f? .... ~~~~ em Of CHUlA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 15, 1993 Mrs. Regina Hickey 21 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 RE: Your letter of May 29, 1993 Dear Mrs. Hickey: We are in receipt of your letter of May 29, 1993. In response to your request for written instruction on the ways in which you may bring up all the issues on this project, please note that a public hearing is scheduled before the Planning Commission for June 23, 1993 at 7:00 p:m. at which time you have the right to present any evidence against this project. You may also submit additional written evidence to the Planning Commission at or prior to the public hearing. A subsequent public hearing will be held by the City Council in July for this project. You will be noticed of this public hearing as well. Sincerely, M~rr ~ "'~ Martin Miller Associate Planner cc: Planning Commission Robert Leiter, Director of Planning Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director Steve Griffin, Principal Planner Doug Reid, Environmental Review Coordinator Barbara Reid, Associate Planner David Harris, Community Development Specialist ~?/ /1 al-I8'5 ~V~ ~ d:~ ~ --..... ~~~~ em OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT June 14, 1993 Mr. Hart G. Klein 11070 Caminito Vista Pacifica San Diego, California 92131 RE: Your letter of June 8, 1993 requesting continuance of PCC-93-39 from the scheduled June 23. 1993 public hearing before the Planning Commission Dear Mr. Klein: We are in receipt of your letter of June 8, 1993, requesting a continuance of PCC-93-39 from the scheduled June 23, 1993 public hearing before the Planning Commission. While we understand your desire for additional time to review the proposal prior to the Planning Commission hearing. we do not feel there is a basis for staff to recommend a continuance of the public hearing as requested. However, we will forward your letter to the Planning Commission for their consideration. Please also note that your have the right to appear before the Planning Commission regarding your request for a continuance or any other issue related to the project. The City Council will render the final decision on the project at a subsequent public hearing, at which you will also be given notice and the opportunity to be heard. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please call Martin Miller at 476- 5335 or me at 691-5101. Sincerely, ;:/ /! ;t/;/t~A/- Robert Leiter Director of Planning cc: Planning Commission Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director Steve Griffin, Principal Planner Doug Reid, Environmental Review Coordinator Barbara Reid. Associate Planner Martin Miller, Associate Planner. David Harris, Community Development Specialist ~ d- .... ~I 276 FOURTH AVE"/CHULA VISTA CALIFORNIA 91910/1619; 691-5101 <9-1 -/8<.p ~~~ ~ ~~~~ ellY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT July 2, 1993 Paul Robinson McDonald, Hecht and Solberg 600 West Broadway, Eighth Floor San Diego, CA 92101 Re: South Bay Community Services Transitional Housing for Homeless Families at 31 Fourth A venue Dear Mr. Robinson: This letter is in response to your letter and public testimony to the Planning Commission on June 23, 1993. Mr. Bob Leiter has referred the matter to me for response. The issues that you raised in your letter and testimony are addressed below. Increased Densitv The number of residents currently on the property is 32 and if the proposed project is approved, there will be a 33 % increase to 44. The owner of the building has stated that over the past 5 years (the time of their ownership), the number of residents has varied between 25 and 40. As that is the case, the increase from the current 32 residents to the proposed 44 does not appear to be a significant increase. There are no City restrictions on occupancy of apartments other than that contained in the Uniform Housing Code which generally allows for 1 occupant for every 90 sq. ft. of floor area. This would result in a maximum allowable occupancy of over 100 residents. Public Imorovements The Engineering Department wrote in their comments on the revised project description that "an irrevocable offer of dedication will be required to meet the half-width standards of said dedication. " Page 3 of the Environmental Checklist (part of the Initial Study) explains "Engineering staff commented that the primary access roads are adequate to serve the project. As Fourth Avenue is designated as a four-lane major street in the City's General Plan, an irrevocable offer of dedication will be required to meet the half-width standards of said designation. " The requirement for an offer of dedication is not based on environmental reasons since the traffic analysis shows no impact on traffic as few residents will have automobiles. Accordingly, there is no environmental reason to demand dedication. The conditional use permit does not JI-(f7 lR [, _I 276 FOURTH AVE"/CHULA VISTA CALIFORNIA 919101(619) 691-5101 Paul Robmson -2- July 2, 1993 include the requirement for dedication as there is no nexus. In fact, it is proposed that the dedication be obtained as a condition of the City's financial grant, if the grant is given. Schools The Negative Declaration stated that the existing school system is not expected to be impacted by the small number of children who will be residing in this facility. This comment is based on the letters received from both the Sweetwater School District and Chula Vista School District. Subsequent to the receipt of these letters, the School District was misinformed that the center was anticipated to house between 34 and 44 children. Further discussion with School District staff regarding the correct number of children and plans by South Bay Community Services to transport the children resulted in the inclusion of a condition in the C.U.P. requiring the South Bay Community Services to transport the children to the schools they are currently attending or to the schools designated by the District. As a result of this condition being placed in the conditional use permit, the School Districts are satisfied. Drainal!e The original Mitigated Negative Declaration identified a potential impact from inadequate drainage and that as mitigation, a monitor would field check the existing on-site drainage. Upon consultation with the City Attorney, it was determined that the drainage problem was not significant and that mitigation was not required. Since the project does not involve any new construction, and there will not be any additional surfaces that will create additional runoff, and because the drainage problem is one that is in existence now and not created or exacerbated by this project, there is not a potential for a significant environmental impact. The Addendum is the appropriate form of environmental analysis. Noticinl! Your letter indicated violation of CEQA Guidelines by the fact that the May 17, 1993, date on the completed Mitigated Negative Declaration is four days prior to the end of the May 21, 1993, public comment period for the Environmental Initial Study. You are correct that the date of May 17, 1993, was on the first page of the document as that was the date that work on the draft began. The date was inadvertently not corrected on the final document. However, the document was not completed and notification flled with the County Clerk until May 24, 1993. Alternatives You indicated in your verbal presentation to the Planning Commission that no alternative sites were considered in accordance with CEQA. Section 15071 of the Guidelines describes the required contents of a Negative Declaration. Alternatives are not included in the required _I/;~ /' 011 -/?v Paul Robinson -3- July 2, 1993 contents. Alternatively, Section 15126 of the Guidelines, which addresses the Contents of Environmental Impact Reports discusses alternatives. Negative Declarations are not required under CEQA to deal with alternative sites. Reauirement for an EIR There is a lack of substantial evidence in the administrative record that the proposed project might have a significant environmental impact. "Substantial Evidence" according to Section 15384 of the Guidelines means enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion that there is a significant effect. Mere uncorroborated opinion or rumor does not constitute substantial evidence. Discrimination Your statement that South Bay Community Services House Rules may have the potential to violate Federal and State laws regarding equal access are accurate. We have brought this to the attention of South Bay Community Services and they have clarified their intent to comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws. Specifically, South Bay Community Services informs us they will only exclude from the program people currently, actively involved in the use of drugs and alcohol or those suffering from a mental illness which renders them incapable of functioning in an independent environment. Conclusion We trust that this letter answers your concerns. It is our determination that the process that has been followed by City staff is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and applicable City codes and regulations. Sincerely, t!/&.-,e . Reid ental Review Coordinator DDR:BR/nr (robinson.llr) cc: Mr. Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney /;fl' .-1 c9(-cy'1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF ARTICLE ON EFFECTS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON PROPERTY VALUES d ( - (1 v The Effects of Subsidized and Affordable Housing On property Values: A Survey of Research State of California George Deukmejian, Governor Business, Transportation and Housing Agency John Geoghegan, Secretary Department of Housing and community Development Christine D. Reed, Director Housing Policy Development Division Nancy J. Javor, Chief principal Author- Marco A. Martinez Support staff Kim Bailey Farrell savage-Low Barbara Tillman 1988 d(- 11 ( ~~/ ~I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The California LegiSlature has recognized, in housing element law and numerous other provisions of the Government Code, that local and state governments have a responsibility to use their powers to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provisions for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community (Government Code Section 65580(d)). Yet, many California cities find it difficult to promote and encourage 10w- and moderate-income housing opportunities for their citizens. Resistance often comes from local citizens themselves, who fear that the. development of 10w- and moderate-income housing or the inclusion of affordable units in market-rate developments will in some way lower the aesthetic and, more importantly, the economic value of their properties. As a result, many potentially beneficial projects may be rejected or made so difficult to develop that developers, non-prOfit agencies, and other housing producing organizations target their efforts elsewhere. This paper lists and summarizes a total of 15 published papers: 11 on the effects of subsidized housing on property values, one on the effects of group homes for the handicapped, and three on the effects of manufactured housing. The listing is not presumed to be complete, but does include all known and readily available material on this subject. Four of these publications address situations in California. Of these 15 publications, 14 reached the conclusion that there are no significant negative effects from locating subsidized, special-purpose or manufactured housing near market-rate developments. Some, in fact, reported positive property value effects after locating subsidized units in the neighborhood. Only one example, describing a situation in Virginia, found evidence that subsidized housing had an adverse effect on the values of adjacent non-subsidized housing. This paper is offered in the hope that planners, city officials, housing developers, and affordable housing advocates will find it useful in countering or defusing the argument of damaged property values wherever it arises in opposition to the development or improvement of affordable housing. ; .~q / .--1 3{-/1;;J- . SBCS INFORMATION ON THEm CASA NUESTRA FACILITY AT 1515 HILLTOP DRIVE ;;z ( -( 13 315 4th Avenue. Suite E . Chula Vista . CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/5051 June 2, 1993 J";'t.=".-.._ .......t,.,.I... f\/- -. c:. '""' JUN (J f' /oc- "',J..'( Ms. Barbara Reid Mr. Martin Miller City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 PLAId' . ,., ,,~,t!n "'ll\,) Dear Ms. Reid and Mr. Miller: As promised in my letter of May 22, I am enclosing documentation of interactions between South Bay Community Services staff and neighbors of SBCS' homeless and runaway youth shelter at 1515 Hilltop Drive, Chula Vista. As you can see, staff has promptly and courteously responded to each inquiry by a neighbor. Supervising staff has solved issues by meeting with neighbors, creating new house rules, and reprimanding residents. If you have any questions regarding this document, please call me at 420-3620. s:ncerelY'G- ~/ ---- t;;;a~c~ Community Development Director Attachment &<>oa1ocI "..".. ~ UnI....,,-. () 0 ' of SanDe<>lC<u1y , r I 2/ - ICf~ 12/18/90 Incident: Mr. Stull (the spelling on this name may not be correct), a neighbor, said that he saw a resident throw oranges at his car. Response: We had a meeting immediately with the residents. A. admitted that he was the one who did it. A. was given a consequence for his behavior and the neighbor was apologized to. 5/15/91 Incident: One of the neighbors behind the house made a complaint that our back porch light is bothering them. Response: The staff and residents were told to turn the back porch light off unless someone needed to be in the back yard. Staff and residents were also asked to keep the light off after 8 p.m. unless absolutely necessary. 10/11/91 Incident: Mrs. Woods made a number of complaints to the Program Director: 1. Kids loitering in the yard. 2. Kids over-watering the yard. 3. Kids playing loud music. 4. Kids making comments to her out the window. 5. Kids are leaving their blinds open when they are changing. 6. Kids are going to the store too often. 7. Our yard is messy. B. People are parking too close to her driveway. Response: 1. Staff and residents reminded that residents are not allowed to hang out in front of house. Residents are only allowed to hang out in back of house. 2. Staff and residents reminded not to over-water the yard. 3. Staff instructed to control the residents' noise level better. Instructed to confiscate radios if residents are incapable of complying. 4. Residents instructed to not talk to the Woods'. Residents reminded that we need to be good neighbors. 5. Residents instructed to close the blinds when they change clothes. Blinds were inspected and repaired. 6. Staff is reminded of rule regarding limited number of store runs for each resident. Store runs are not allowed after dark without a staff member. 7. Staff is reminded to check chores better, particularly yard work. B. Staff instructed to make sure the Woods' driveway is not blocked in any way. Comments: The residents say that Mr. and Mrs. Woods sit in their window all day and night and stare in to our yard and windows. 1)// _I .;)..( ~iqJ Residents say they only make comments to Mrs. Woods when they get sick of seeing her staring at them all day. Residents state that Mrs. Woods makes nasty comments to them first. Staff and residents have stated that there have hardly been any incidents of our residents loitering in front of the house or making noise. Staff and residents have stated that they feel that the Woods' are out to get Casa Nuestra shut down. Staff and residents stated that they feel that the Woods' are blowing all the incidents out of proportion just to make trouble for the shelter. Staff was instructed that the best thing to do is to continue to try and not give the Woods' any more ammunition against us. Residents are instructed again to keep their blinds shut and not pay any attention to Mr. and Mrs. Woods. ------------------------------------------- 11/4/91 Incident: One of the residents made an inappropriate comment to one of the neighbors. Response: The neighbor was apologized to and assured that the offending resident would be given a consequence for their actions. The resident was given a consequence of writing a paper on what it means to show respect to people. The resident was also warned that he would have his radio confiscated the next time the volume went up. 2/25/93 Incident: Some of the residents have complained to me that the neighbors were "baiting them." The residents said that the Woods' andlor their sons were making nasty comments to them over the fence. Response: I asked the residents if they had provoked these incidents. The residents stated that they had not. They said that when they were simply out in the yard talking or doing yardwork, the neighbors would make threatening or provoking remarks to them. A resident told me that one of the Woods' sons had told him that he would come over the fence and kick his ass. I asked the resident if he responded to the remark. The resident stated that he had not. The resident stated that he responded by going back inside the house. I met with staff and residents and instructed them to ignore any nasty remarks from the Woods' house, but to make sure they reported any incidents to me. 4/22/92 Incident: There has been a complaint regarding noise levels from the neighbors. __ ! f)')-~ d(-ICf(p Resoonse: Staff was spoken to and told to monitor noise levels at all times. A meeting was also held with the residents to discuss the matter. Also, staff and residents have made comments to me that the neighbors, Mr. and Mrs. Woods have been paying lots of attention to our house. Staf f has told me that Mr. and/ or Mrs. Woods can generally be seen sitting by the window in the dark, smoking cigarettes and looking into our windows and yard. Staff and residents told me they sit up there and stare at our house day and night. I told staff and residents to ignore them and try not to do anything to provoke them. 5/3/92 Incident: At 12:30 a.m. the Chula vista Police came to the house to complain about the noise level. According to the police, the neighbors have been complaining about the noise, but have not been getting a response from us. Response: I investigated the incident. I found that the staff member on duty was not able to calm the residents down sufficiently. The staff member was given additional supervision by myself regarding her skills in supervising the clients. For the next couple of weeks, the agenda at our staff meetings centered around client supervision. Additionally, I contacted Mr. and Mrs. Woods, the next door neighbors and asked them if they had any further complaints or problems. I gave them my pager number and let them know they could contact me at any time if there was any noise or other problems. The Woods' seemed somewhat happier as a result of this contact. However, the Woods' made it very clear to me that they did not like the idea of having a shelter next to their house. They told me that they were against it from the beginning and tried to fight it. They also let me know that they would do everything in their power to get us shut down and out of the neighborhood. 6/27/92 Incident .1 (Program Director Reporting): I received a call on my pager from Mr. Woods at approximately 4:00 p.m. I called him back. He sounded very agitated and stated that the residents at Casa Nuestra were playing rap music with four letter words in it. I asked him if the music was being played too loud. Be said no. I asked him if the music was being played outdoors. Be said no, but that the windows were open and he could hear the language on the music. He said it was unacceptable and he couldn't stand that kind of language being played when he could hear it. Be said he had grandchildren that were beginning to curse and he attributed it to overhearing the language of the shelter kids. Be said he had to look out for his family and he would do anything to protect them. He said he was on disability and was often in pain and he was not 1]3 ' _I d-/ -(9 7 . _-w in the best of moods alot of the time. He said that he felt that if the problems continued he would do something we all would regret. He said he felt that if he had a gun he would go over to the shelter and wipe everybody out. He said there would be nobody left, he would just "wipe them all out." He repeated this threat many times during the conversation. I said to him that that would be a shame, and we should try to find a peaceful means to clear things up. He said he agreed, but if the problems continued, he would follow through on his threat. Incident *2 (Staff Member Reporting): At 3:45 p.m. the south neighbor, Mrs. Woods, came knocking on the door. She asked how we (the staff) could let residents go on playing the type of music they were playing, and at the volume they were playing it. She also expressed that something would happen if.it continued. She said that if her sons happened to be around, they would jump the fence, there would be a fight, and the residents would be killed. I told her I would take the threat seriously. She said I should. She also stated that she will do everything she can to close down the shelter. Response: I notified the Executive Director of the agency. We made a police report. The police questioned myself and the staff member to gather more details. The police let us know that they would be speaking to the Woods' regarding their threats. Also, I spoke with all of the staff and warned them that the Woods' had made threats on their lives. Staff was instructed to contact me immediately if the Woods' made any further contact with them or any of the residents. The residents were also spoken to about the incident and given instructions to let staff know if the Woods' made any threats or comments to them. Residents were also instructed once again to keep any music down low so as to not provoke or bother the Woods'. Residents were told that they would have their radios confiscated if they were not able to keep the volume down. f)tf .,- _I d I -( q !?- We, the undersigned, declare that we live in the vicinity of Soutb. Bay CO:!lwunity Services' runaway & homeless youth shelter, C.,sa Cluestra. We have found that Clsa :fuestra has not posed any probl<:ms to Qur neighborhood. ,here have been no problems c{itl noise. gorbage. loitering, or any'otb.er such problems from their facility's clients. The e~te:ior of their ::.ouse is kept clenn and blends in with the other houses on the block. They have been considerate neighbors to us. i'-'I/( ~~" -n! (...,' ADDRESSOII-!:'1 ,I..- :II(ld i.' - I i -r \. .! 7H17! . I'lT .(~p{~'l\(' i NAME -\1', n,,; II'" J)VJ~~ms . ! ___ :Jlli1LI fup -.J\JP\-0\tA: A iV1ElJIN.4 F ' 1(1; -;::;:'\ ,JI--! ('Ie, f t ~cbe(2.+ -l"\'crf~'-\;::\ /' ,A) u (: \ . r""l' /"\-?'" OAT::' L\ ;(~'~p \W1 71r'i .J Cj~ 4-~9-93 " ---" ___1'1~ o /-r'ct 9 PROPOSED SBCS HOUSE RULES .;;> \ - aDO SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES SHORT-TERM HOUSING + The project will provide 50 beds for Chula Vista and National City homeless families with children working to become self- sufficient. + The project will be located at 31 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista. The site is near public transportation, police and fire units, service providers, shopping, and parks. + A recent study by the Regional Task Force on Homelessness shows over 1,000 homeless people in the South Bay, but only 8 shelter beds, compared to 1,550 beds in the County. + Funding sources include the Cities of Chula vista and National City, State of California, federal government, private donations, and in-kind donations. + Families will be referred from local organizations which currently work with the homeless including schools, police, nonprofit organizations, ar.d religious institutions. + Families with any drug abuse, alcohol, or mental illness problems will not be accepted into the program. They will be referred to, and provided transportation to, other programs. + Before entering the progran, all family members will be required to sign a strict set of "Rules & Regulations" including no alcohol or drug use or possession; adherence to their case plan; plus commitment to housecleaning, cooking, and other chores. Failure to meet these rules is grounds for immediate eviction. + After reviewing a number of sites for the project, including bank foreclosure properties, motels, and new construction, 31 Fourth Avenue was found to be the most economical. + South Bay Community Services operates the region's only homeless shelter, Cas a Nuestra, a home housing eight runaway and homeless youths. + SBCS is coordinating a te~ of local service providers including MAAC Project, Lutheran Social Services, and Episcopal Community Services to provide a wide range of services geared at helping families achieve self-sufficiency. + The services include: job training and referral, child care, case management, health care, permanent housing referral, budgeting, independent living skills, literacy training, psychological counseling, and transportation. (ahel\ahhulle4.doc) 6>\ - ;/0/ f)1P" ...--1 . PARKING SURVEY OF HOMELESS PROJECTS a-I/Cfc&- (/) i w t: c ...J It! 2 a:: ~ ~ J (/) ~~ ~ 55 (/)lZ ~ ~~ I ~~ ~ 5 ~i I ~ ~g ~ ~ ~; ~ ___If)f}/ d (~dOO !$. :S:S Cl ~ . 1 CQ - c:i ~ ~ m DISCLOSURE STATEMENT cJ 1- dO <f CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Sta tement of di scl osure of certa i n ownershi p i nteres ts, payments, or campa i gn contributions, on all ~atters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other official bodies. The fonowing information must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the application, bid, contract, or proposal. N/A If real property is involved, list the names of all persons having any owners~i;J interest. N/A 2. If an) person identified pursuant to (]) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation' or owning any partnership interest in the partnership. N/A 3. !f cr;y person i dentifi ed pursuant to (]) above is a non-profit organi zati on or a :rust, iis~ the names of any person serving as director of the non-profit orgar;ization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. Charles Pugsley, Chair ~hirley Ferrill, Treasurer Reves Franco, Vice Chair Kathryn Lembo, Executive Director 4. Have yeu or any persor named in (1) above had more than $250 worth of busi ness ~~'a.~s"~:ed with any member of City staff, Boards, COl!ll1issions, Committees and c.ou~C':~ with;" the past twelve months? Yes No~ If yes, please indicate jjerscn.si 5. HaVE jO'.J and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Ye s No X if yes, state which Councilmember(s): Person is defined as: "Any individual, firm, copartnership, joint venture, association, social club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city and county, city, municipality, district or other pol Hical subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit." (NOTE: Attach additi nal 3/0 Dat~: \-IPC 07Dl? A-l1 0 Kathryn Lembo Print or type name of contractor/applicant f)~/ .---/ d) .;LbS July 13, 1993 MEMO TO: The Honorable Mayor & City Council Patty we(JJ~ AGENDA ITE~~;f HOMELESS FACILITY FROM: SUBJECT: For the last two days, our office has received numerous calls from the constituency concerning the homeless facility (23 in opposition and 6 in favor). I have enclosed a list of all calls for your reference. I think I should point out that one of the citizens explained to me that a letter was being circulated throughout the neighborhood (unsigned) which I have included and marked exhibit "A" for your information. Additionally, two constituent letters were received in response to that circulated letter. Encls. mem dl ~3 .:J 0 ciM~ORTANT CITY COUNCIL MEETING JULY 13, 1993. (TUESDAY 6:00PM) **~*****************************************************:~******** 'A' RE: FAMILY HOMELESS CENTER LOCATED AT 31 4TH A'/ENUE. ON JULY 13, 1993, THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL WILL VOTE ON ~JHETHER TO AF'PROVE THE "CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" FOR THE FAMILY HOMELESS CENTER TO BE LOCATED AT 31 4TH AVENUE. SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES (NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION), IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE CITY OF CHUL.<~ VISTA ARE PROPOSING THIS HOi'IELESS SHELTER. THE APPLICATION FOF: THE "CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT" HAS BEEN PROCESSED BY THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA IN A VERY "FAST TF:AC:<" MANNER WITHOUTcPROPER .REGARDF;OR CERIA,INJMP.o.RTAf\l] cISSUES. THESE:' .ISSUES .ARE':SUMMARIZED BELOW, ":..:,":>;.>:.;;.c.c;.cc,._-,-,',...c,c C,';C. .., ..-., _". . -., * 'THE NEIGHBORS WERE, INFORi'lED"OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT' .. VIA SAN DIEGO UNION NEWSPAPER ARTICLE. CITY COUNCIL . APPROVED THIS PROJECT IN CONCEPT ON MARCH 23,1993, . . AT :'1, OOAM.NO OPPOSITION_WAS THERE AT 1 'OOAM,' SINCE __ .+tf'Le. CITY. NOTIFICATIONdDID NO, ,GO OUT .TO.THENEIGHBORHOOD. ...-.",~.._,,;,- - - -~ . - '-'f'~'>;7~?::~~~~;;~:::~?~;-:::','-::--:::'-'"'~-;:-: -.::-.,:)~:~~:"r~>-=,:.t>.'/-'_::~-..':.::' ..--~:_-:.:~~,.~:., . -~-~.~-~,:;- ~f~." '. :'.>.~~~~.-"'~ _' _::':" ". :_" ;::<-. u_ _ ~",- .. :. :'_'- .' :* ,THE'::" COND ITI ONALUSE ,PERi'lI'E..'pROCESS HAS ~AVOIDED ><THE",?,,,,c7"'t' . DRAFTING AND PUBLIC REVIEW DF.ANnENVIRONMENTALIMPACI':'l",;;t-~~-t'" ; .... ......, 'Li~~~&.~2~::~2'~;~~i',~~~~;~:~S:A,$C3E.JE~~~~sB:#i;;~;~;0~:~f.~;7~j;:(~:jS<[~-,~'C":'.(' .. " . .... ". ...-. - ..X:f;CERT A I N'I"UBLI C~!iMPR'ciVE:MENTS -~1l.:'I ~'E3fW'IDE~{fNG'''dF -:FOURj'H";;:;;lE.<~:'tf~:'?';,:,: :.'i.,',,:,.-:: ...~..~ "'h'''-:,t:''"~~_~'n "=i .._..._("~_~""'::"'.- " . '~".._ '_.:'''. _'--. -'-. _..... _~:~.......____"--._.:.....__.___._ ........_..._.. __.:...... . _ ._--_.--~~._:___--:-..":.__...:- -. :'::'{.'''?:AVE~UE~~:HA'IE:~iOT;,'8EE:N;REGlUI RED 'EVEN cTHOUGH. THE 'CITY:,'~(';;~'~::;:C:,,";'c , ENGINEERS ORIGINALLY:REQUESTED THEM.'THE'WIDENING ',-c.': c.:.'. -,-:WAS 'WAIVED SINCE .SOUTH BAY 'COMMUNLT,Y_~SERVICES ~IS ':,'=~-c;.h'::f!.:'~:'- .' . "--.,:~:'4~~~2Ir; ~~..,H.~~~~~~.~f~~~,;;~~'~~~:r;:~~;~;'E'.;;~;Ec;~;~;~~~'0~~~:;:E.~:.::>~:: ...', ::;,*'ACCESS~TO THIS':PlJBLI'C 'HOlJSING PRO~ECT-BY~~Bi(~bF 'f:;~'-: ~-, '~.+c~? . : . :- PRIVATE EASEi'lENT,.:ROAD ..H~S j-lQT ..BEEN CAREFULLY "'::ANAL YZED ;:.~ . : ' , , ' .'. ;';"'--':' :,:~'~~~'~:'-:;".':",'':'~ ~..~'"- - [. --.-/:~:;:-:_ '~~:~;"':::~~;.~,':,~.::'-;~:_-';_;~'_i",,-,';:~";'~;~:~'_~,:::">'.'"",;n~-',_,, :~ ~:';;'.:'~~'~-. ____ "'_'''__'^'',,''~''ioi>'' -. '_~-' ~ ':'-'--'~..~-,.~..'"_' . - . *"EVIDENCE EX ISTS (COMPARABLE SALES) THAT CLEARLY INDICATES THAT THE CLTY AND SOUTH BAY COMi'lUNITY . t+roe . SERVICES WILL BE PAYING FAR TOO MUCH FOR_THE PROPERTY.~~, .... . '. .. ':LARGEPREMIUMS ARE BEING PAID FOR314TH(HOMELESS ...... .' ." , ~;--',;.<SHELTERf__AND'i7' 4TH AVE. .JSUBSIDIZED,'HOUSING).,:".:~_...;i.',-",,,..._;;:.!:>.~:,,,;;"i, . :-.~':t-;.,{'~.:..~~i~-,~:,~~~~';~~i~~~;~;?ib~;;~:;~-~;:~~.~-~~:;~~f~~;;,~~:~~~~~ti~t:f~~~?::::-:~j~:~~~~~f\/~~.;.>~~~.t;~~%~~t~i2~~~r:~';~~~~f ,...,.-".:-;c:'!\'?'U.';':,"c$$$$$ $$$$$$ $ $$$ $$$$ $$$$$$ $$ $$$$$$$ $ $ $$ $$$ $$$$$$$$$$$ $$$ 5t",;<,,~;,..;;*T".:: ,';'~:~~7~f~\I;~~.I~~~~it~l~&~ii~~ii~~~~~i~~~;~i~~~t~~~~"!. ;;, :-';T~t.ii;~f':i,,;'-~~$$$$~$$$$$$ ~$i;$ $$$,$$$$ $$$ $$$$$$ $$$$ $$ $~ll.$.$$,$$$.,$$$$$$ $$~~.1W<-~':':i~, -'.:.~~:~-~:~~?/~~~~i~~-:-'~~:~:'~~~:~',i~--:.~~:~'E....~~~t;,-~~~~~~~~~';-l-~~~~~~~;~i~~~'~~if~~~.#?i~~~l'i';~ - -' . , .'-~ ;{:1~~~'~~:-:'; A?,;JcAREFU~'ANACYS rS'':CiF-;;;-cHEAPE'R:'At!i I:.RN"A"TIVE'''S'r-'fE-S7HAS ~NOT.' . ,~,,';"";E;,L",,~" . {::;EEN''''' -~C"O~'N"D'U"C';T'.E'D'~~I' 'F;;T.~-~;;-E"N"'V""-I'"R=O'-~N'-M"EN-iA~:'iM' P'A....'C. T'Y~E"P'~O'~R-:W "~'- ~':'-....; -~, )!t.. ~~....,,~~_.... ,~.'I!<".,......_~........~,.~~~5J:t-....~...." -'~'"~""'''---5'''''-~''Ito_,-~.iO~''-~..,c.:,,_....i.',H;.....,...,.,;~y-:;~.-........ .",,1. " _ :.~ .2 "€ !;!f!D.2!~.Ig:J;N};F~gF;ft"'EJ:)/;'if!P;,EI1W.:rl.R~~?_A"(ER;~,Q).,J~,D,;;He~~E.~BE:EN~';' . .4,~: 8.E,r;sCTF.~'iej\lp~p~I~C1,JSSED~~Wr;"'I:lA'?~Sl~'f_E~~B!:QgF=.?.r,~N8:01:HER' , itS:. ... .!rg:fJ:)tJCtltt~I.A.IJQj\l';''!"~EU,L.~Aii%-,:;:~qt''~9.!'-1H~ERY-tc:SS,'~ ,:. .' . .,.~!'- ::,:~2' ". . .' ~. ......;.;COLft:D~ot...~PRODUCE~A.NY+DOCuMENTAnoN.,..AND"'REFERRED;US'E-l:O:F.....""Ji.1;?i..." ".;: :~~~~?i~~~THt}:Sgg[~riMI'1P~ITYflbE.?~-opfjEN:f}'[)Ef>-A'E3tiii.~iT:~THEyci1NiiQf}E'~%[Jic;~",~ -".{,j,.C, --.jt~;;-frL:;' TOLD ,DS'"SEVERAL 0 SITES;' WERE:;.CONS I DERED. ~;BUT>':HAVE';NO .,:"" :..,;",."::-;.__.".'::"::' ':'.':.~~,:i}:;~[.:"!boCUMENTATfOj\FbR:;ANAi.:yS ! S~ OF. OTHER ~S f TES~--'~( TURN'" OVERrc;2;;.:: . .'" C"~~<'ijClijJlI~~";~cI'i;" ... ... ..-.... ,.~::~~~~:~;~~~: --~~~}~~~~t~~~:{,'.;..;(-,:~.~~~:,-< " '\ , ~: -....,-:;-~.. ',~ ,- -l'.~,_~ F.Tv.. ,~AS BEEN ON FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. THIS PROJECT _ uc-\: ~~'- RECEIVED ZERO OPPOSITION FROM THE ENTIRE CITY STAFF. THE r PERMIT HAS BEEN PROCESSED IN RECORD TIME. WHEN IS THE LAST TIME THAT YOU RECEIVED SUCH SERVICE BY THE CITY? .:.:,-. c,-l.J~'-, rIA,", .....-+-r.....:f'\-l.---1--'1 ~ ...... I NORTH CHULA VISTA HAS ITS SHARE OF HOUSING FOR THE . HANDICAPPED. ALCOHOL ABUSERS, ETC.. SINCE THE CITY GOAL IS ,'. .~~~~ TO HA<JE A BALANCED COMMUNITY, WE RECOM~1END THAT OTHEr:: SITES - k""ic'1- BE CONS !DERED FOF: THE "HOMELESS SHELTER" AND SUBS I D I ZED HOUSING.' ) AS TAXPAYERS;'~I!IZENS, NEIGHBORS, AND VOTERS, WE SHOULD STRONGLY OBJECT ,TO THIS 'iERY. EXPENSII;E PF;OJECT. LET THE CITY COUNCIL~:NOW HOW FEEL. BARGAIN REAL ESTATE PROJECTS EXIST AND WE SHOULD INSIST THAT THE COUNCIL SEND SBCS BACK TO LOCATE AND SIUDY OTHER SITES. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT OUR LOCAi..NE~.JSPAPER (STAR NE~JS)IS OPPOSED TO THIS PROJECT,.AND.ASt<ED .CITY.COUNCIL TO .NOL. ..-."".- APPROVE IT I N CONCEPT. I N ADD I TI ON, ''-THE CITY HOUS I NG .. . . ADV I SORY COMM I TrEE VOTED AGA I NST. SAY I NG JHEHOUS I ~IG SHEL TEF: COSTS TOO MUCH AND IS NOT IN THE RIGHTLOCATION. THE HEAVY TRAFfIC. ON4 TH . AVENUE AND TRAFFIC. ON _THE EASE~1ENT F:OAD ..... n.. .' CREATE "A ,SAFETY HAZARD' FOR CH ILDREN .-HOUSED _'AT.., .THE SHELTER ~;,:.:;;~~.-- . _.-- .:.""- -~-?'~:;2<'-~:~-;:~~~.i_~.:":~~.~.:=:::::".~'~T ,~-_-. -i:, ~ - :~': .'~:?~.::;!.::''7~::~' ->::T,,!<;:~,,:\,_:{;:~~,>:';'Li{~~'-)~E.f;~ :~~:~~:i~::~;~:~;.~,2.~;Ji~)LL:~;,::~:@~f~j;t7~~c,-,~, :;'~>~/J,;~>t:~":~. niISIS OUR LAST CHANCE 'TO BE:HEARD."Ci'TY-~'COUNCiLMA~:'ES:.'::::':;'~;~O:;-- .n__'" FINAL D!OCISrON ON JULY :i3;"1993.',:THE COLi~jc!L"'MEETING IJJILLBE'~ '.. AT..6; OOPM, . IN THECOUNCILCHAI'1BERS;~'276J:OUR.TH AVENUE.'"' ..... --'--'"',....~- -...-'.-'- .......;,".0,...-.., n. __ __._.. _ _ .r~' __. . ___.~__. _ ...- ...-- .."c....__,._ PLEASE DO NOT MISS MEETING. BRING FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS . --.....- ,,::'~~'~::'~':~." " . ---:-- -""'-~""~--:.~"~"':'.:" . ... '.. -, -.---:-::-:::;:-,';'.' :..~-"-;"'-;~:::'>;-:;~~...' ... IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CALL ..578-3272:' .'-" ~. ...._~-, ".0-' ,'_;0- WRITE A LETTER. FAX A LETTER OR CALL THE MAYOR AND COIJNC,IL BEFORE THE MEETING TO DOCUMENT YOUR CONCERNS. ",.' . ".~ . -i': ~ ..~~~~i~~i~~,~J~iiij.~i~Bi~i~~ ., . PS :,;::~25o.~ OpO~SAVED .~CAN:,PROV. IDEi.MANYiOTHER;;NEEDED'SERVJ CES .:::-'~' -'---=~'~"~~:':'-I. ,-_. '--.~- .:,-... 7 ~ -;;,--- .:;.....' ..... . -- '~;~~~~ir~:~i>- . ',' ...~",::, July 6, 1993 Mayor Tim Nader and City Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader and City Council: I live at 57 Fourth Avenue in Chula Vista and am writing to tell you about a petition I signed opposing the project for homeless families at 31 Fourth Avenue. I was told the project was a flop house for alcoholic single men and others. So, I signed the petition against the program and went around to my neighbors having them sign too. Later, I learned that the program is not for single men, but only for families, and that it is not for alcoholics, the mentally ill, or others. I also learned that families will have job training, child care, and other services to help them get off the streets and back on their feet. After learning the truth about the program, I was mad about being lied to. I am mad that I signed the petition opposing it and had others sign. I wanted you to know this and think you should ignore the petition all together. Sincerely, ~ '''-.1 .~ C5/cv~~ \\""-.Q""-.\C 'L\O~ For ~ Ou..f- T\vy\'~ fn) em JL[b L..\" i' il'j"1:i, tJUL JUL I 3 1993 r ,'_' ~7:--;~:;-'C':- - _.._~,~-j Ci:', t '-;u":';) c;:, ._" ',: ," - ------ v/ A~.",\.... ,\1;. \~\ " .~-c9 \ -c90q July 9, 1993 !i::-:;-c~> , f.::-.' f:' /. r I,' '"", . ,,"J it. ' . ~.,.,...... JUL 2 :',::~:{) Mayor Nader and city Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader, I am a resident of Chula Vista and want to share Boma disturbing information with you. Recently, my family was approached by a woman with a petition in opposition to the hOD1elelJ.!l hou"'ing project on Fourth Avenue. She said the project io for bumo, "cholos" , drugqiea, and others who will ruin our neighborhood. pC'"",,~ I have myself learned about the l>rogram and know that this _ was lying. I know the program is for familiOO'<;l ~f"'., ':",ICe trying to get back on their feet, not for druq addicto, ..lr-~h<>l,icF,. the mentally ill.~ or p~ople not working to improve ~'~~ot.tlVatl. i think the program is good and we need something like it for the many homeleslJ families around. I think it is sad that people are signing the petition when they are being lied to. '~Q k)~ok6 \"\\bucL- PI ~C>,':''L'''LEL \ Ic~ (60l":v(\ 1\\)[' c.\-(l.JI.-b. 0,<;;\~ q\o, \0 l~lq) L.\,)..!Q-olS'G f,.:;.\ \ r"i2-,=E ,b L"'l.\.- ~c,(" O"NIL.. QUCSlIC"-.J ./ 1\c.\<''',O<A..,\~'o.5''''\-"\ \Q'\\n ,,-,:,,-\;,' ;2/-.;2(0 HOMELESS FACILITY - OPPOSITION PHONE CALLS RECEIVED AT THE CITY COUNCIL OFFICES MANEY ADLER 427-2420 JOHN BARKER 321 VIA SALARIA 91910 420-0465 HENRY BELL 267-2362 JOANN BELL 267-2362 CHRIS BURKHALTER 420-2934 AL CORTEZ 420-3869 MR. DODDS 422-6956 TERRY FRENCH 15 VIA NOMENTANA 91910 427-7506 MARCELA GOMEZ 135 GUAVA 91910 426-7505 PEDRO GOMEZ 426-7505 HENDRICK GREEN 585-3396 SUSAN HATHON 427-8621 (DOES NOT "OPPOSE" HOMELESS FAC; BUT FEELS IT SHOULD BE LOCATED IN ANOTHER PART OF CITY; DOES OPPOSE THE AMOUNT OF TAX PAYERS' $$$ BEING SPENT "WAY OVERPRICED") ROBERT L. JOHNSON 140 GUAVA 91910 425-9757 PAULINE JOHNSTONE 422-2239 ROSE & RAYMOND MATELA 438 MARIETTA ST 91910 427-1373 JIM MC GUIRE 141 GUAVA AVE 91910 420-3621 d-( -4 f CARMEN MUNJUIA 439 MARIETTA 91910 MR. NORTON 129 GUAVA WM OLIVERI THOMAS ORTEGA 21 FOURTH AVE 91910 JERRY SPURLOCK MIM ROBERT STRICK 136 GUAVA 91910 TOM WENZEL 21 FOURTH AVE #4 91910 () 427-7977 420-8872 426-2498 427-5870 426-9607 425-9067 422-7043 c?l-GJIif- HOMELESS FACILITY - SUPPORTING PHONE CALLS RECEIVED AT COUNCIL OFFICES MS. WILLIAMS 420-3208 MIGUEL GONZALES 163 GUAVA AVE 91910 425-3758 *LETTER ATTACHED ANITA LANDRUM *LETTER ATTACHED ELVY SIPIN 470-4253 PARADISE VALLEY HOSPITAL MARIA TOMAS 470-4237 2400 EAST FOURTH ST NATIONAL CITY 91950 RETIRED POLICE CHIEF WM WINTERS lr C:\HOMELESS d ( -6). 13 McDoNALD. HECHT & SOLBERG TELEP"ONE (6191239<344.... "LEX C McDONALD" " ..10,"," HECHT' o",RI'lYL 0 $01..8E:1'lC;" ..JEROLD H GOLDBERG" PAUL E ROBINSON' TMOM"S C NELSON" ROBERTA 5 ROBINSON" DAVID w. BAGLEY, II' Ct-IARLES R GILL' MICHAEl.-") MAHER ""CHARD A SCHUi.-M...N LAUI'lI CROCE STREETER DAVID Fl B LITTLE PETER K SOl-ECI<;, A PARTNERSHIP INCL.UDtNG PF;!OF"ESSIONAL. COlOlPORAT'ON5 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 600 WEST BRDACWAY. EIGI'1TH "'LOOR TELECOPIEA 1619) 232+6828 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORl""IA 92101 "ClENOTCIiio .. .RorESS'O"''''L CO"'..O.....,.-'ON July 13, 1993 Mayor Tim Nader City of Chu1a vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 92010 Re: city Council Agenda of July 13, 1993, South Bay community services (nSBcsn) Application for Conditional use Permit No. PCC-93-39 Dear Mayor Nader and city councilmembers: We write you on behalf of our clients, Hart G. Klein and Barbara G. Klein, Trustees of the Klein Family Trust dated January 22, 1980 and Alan J. Brant and Lavonne Brant, Co-Trustees of the Brant Revocable Family Trust dated October 26, 1988, the owners of properties located at 45, 47 and 49 Fourth Avenue in the City of Chu1a vista ("City"). The purpose of this letter is to set forth multiple reasons why you should not approve the above-referenced Conditional Use Permit ("CUP"). The property, which is the subject of the SBCS Application for the CUP, is located at 31 Fourth Avenue in the City ("property"). Currently, there exists fourteen (14) multi-family dwelling units on the Property. The proposed CUP has been modified to purportedly permit a maximum forty-four (44) persons to reside on site. The prior application indicated that the Property would be redeveloped to permit fifty (50) persons to reside on site. In either event it is obvious that at a minimum the number of people that will reside on the Property will increase by at least thirty-three percent (33%) [City staff has recently informed us that the site presently accommodates thirty-two (32) people]. d. I - d/~ July 13, 1993 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES NOT ADEOUATELY ADDRESSED After reviewing hundreds of pages of documents in the City files and elsewhere, it is abundantly clear the CUP is a foregone conclusion in the minds of certain staff members. To confirm this, one merely needs to review the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which was dated May 17, 1993, a full four (4) days before the end of the public comment period for the Environmental Initial study (May 21, 1993). Staff has indicated that the May 17 date was inadvertently placed on the document. Regardless of what date was placed on the Mitigated Negative Declaration, it is apparent that this is the process that was to be used, notwithstanding public comments that would not be received until later. There are other environmental issues that should have been addressed in an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR"), rather than summarily dismissed through a Negative Declaration. Those include, but are not limited to, potential significant impacts to schools, traffic, access, safety, drainage and the matter of fairly distributing these types of uses throughout the City. In a July 2 / 1993 letter from Mr. Douglas D. Reid, City Environmental Review Coordinator, staff attempted to address the environmental concerns that we raised with the Chula vista Planning commission. We respectfully take issue with staff in its reading of the CEQA Guidelines and its interpretation of "substantial ev idence" . There are enough "smoking guns" in the City's own documents to indicate that a discussion of potential significant environmental impacts should have been conducted. An EIR is not intended to solve the impacts, it is intended to provide the general public with an opportunity to review and analyze environmental impacts of a project. A. Impacts to Schools and PUblic Improvements. There are letters in the city's files from the City engineers that indicate certain public improvements and dedications should be acquired, pursuant to the Chula vista Municipal Code. There are also conflicting letters from representatives of at least one school district that indicate potential impacts to schools by the approval of the CUP. If there were not potential impacts to the schools, the CUP's requirement that SBCS transport children to other schools would not be a condition of approval. --- d (-d-15 July 13, 1993 Page 3 B. Drainage. Probably the most confusing of all of the environmental issues that should have been discussed, is that of drainage. At every juncture, it is clearly pointed out that there is an existing drainage problem on the Property. The processing of an EIR would have most likely required soils and/or drainage reports submitted to the city. The analyses and conclusions of those reports would have been available for public review and comment. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and a later addendum and the July 2, 1993 letter to us from Mr. Reid, indicate that a drainage problem exists. Regardless of the drainage problem's age, a discretionary action is before the City and the extent of the drainage problem should be known in order for mitigating conditions to be placed in the CUP. Again, an EIR would provide the public and you an opportunity to review a complete set of facts before making a fully informed decision. c. Traffic. As previously stated and supported by staff, there will be an increase in the intensity of use of the Property. In addition, according to reports of the Property I s proposed use, you can intuitively see that the proposed use is not g tvpical apartment use. There will be a regular and continuous turn over [sixty (60) day maximum stay). The character of trips generated will be the same in certain respects to a typical apartment, but will be significantly different from a typical apartment in other respects. Vans and shuttles will travel to and from the Property at various hours of the day, not necessarily peak hour trips. Various social out reach program workers and representatives will be visiting the Property. These are not typical apartment trips. The preparation of an EIR would have caused traffic and/or parking studies to be conducted so that differences would have been reviewed and analyzed. And as previously stated, the requirement for public dedications and/or improvements could have been more carefully reviewed. D. Access. One of the most complicated issues, and we submit sensitive for the City , revolves around the manner in which access is available for the Property. The CUP will be served by a private easement, which serves as a driveway for five (5) other apartment complexes which have a total of eighty-six (86) apartments. Thus, the people who will be residing on the Property will enjoy as their .:;1/ ,. dlS July 13, 1993 Page 4 backyard a private driveway that serves numerous other apartments. Why the city would want to be involved in a project that is served by a private easement/driveway is a curious question in and of itself. However, from an environmental standpoint, if an EIR had been drafted, the necessary traffic and safety studies would have been conducted. E. Alternative site Analysis. At the Planning commission hearing of June 23, 1993, SBCS representatives indicated that numerous sites for the CUP were reviewed. Their analysis of alternative sites has not seen the light of day. In our comments to the Planning Commission, we pointed out that had an EIR been properly prepared, alternative sites would have been required to have been analyzed and the results made public. Again, the use of a negative declaration avoids this public scrutiny of alternative sites. PURCHASE PRICE IS TOO HIGH We submit to you, based on expert advice, that the City is not the beneficiary of a fair real estate transaction. A study has been conducted by Mr. Truman Brooks, a Certified Real Estate Appraiser, which looked at comparable sales within the past fifteen (15) months in the immediate area. Mr. Brooks' analysis, which he will present to you tonight, clearly indicates the City is paying far too much for the two properties it is acquiring [approximately TWO HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($250,000.00) too much]. The City's original appraisal and its updated appraisal (February 1993) demonstrate the appraised values remained the same after a one (1) year period had elapsed. We submit it doesn't take an expert to question these results. Based on the economic times, the real estate market and property values are in a state of "free fall". We have not seen properties retain their values from one year to the next. In fact, it is not uncommon for significant decreases in value to occur. In addition to Mr. Brooks' expert opinion, your own Housing Advisory Committee took the position, on February 24, 1993, that this transaction is a bad deal for the City (4 - 2 to deny). The Chula Vista Star News took a similar position on March 6, 1993. d.-[ ~ ,;;L I {p July 13, 1993 Page 5 CONCLUSION On behalf of our clients and the taxpayers of your City, we implore you to take a careful look at the issues raised herein. You should be totally informed before making a decision, especially like this one. --- ~. - sincerely, ~'~^ , --\(I-,.\t~~ ~{~:Y.:;"{"-- Paul E. Robinson, A.P.C. McDONALD, HECHT & SOLBERG PER/bar cc: Mr. Hart G. Klein, Mr. John Goss, city Manager, city of Chula vista Mr. Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney, City of Chula vista Mr. Robert Leiter, Planning Director, city of Chula vista dl-,;).I ? July 12, 1993 From: Honorable Mayor and City Council d John Goss, City Manager (/ /.:7, I Bob Leiter, Director of Planning~[ Additional Information on Item 21; Transitional Housing at 31 Fourth Avenue To: via: Subject: Kathryn Lembo, Executive Director of South Bay Community Services, has reviewed the Council Agenda Statement for 31 Fourth Avenue, and has submitted the attached cover letter and additional information for Council's consideration at the meeting of July 13, 1993. The June 18, 1993 letter from the Chula Vista City School District referred to in the second to the last paragraph of Ms. Lembo's cover letter is duplicated on Page 21-57 of the Agenda packet. .J-( - :;). ( ~ r- '---,"-"'1*--J\ r-D L -..,,~."...: \. t.:- 315 4th Avenue, Suite E . Chula Vista . CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/5051 July 12, 1993 Mr. Steve Griffin City of Chula Vista Planning Department 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Griffin: I am writing in regards to the Council Agenda Statement for the July 13 meeting, which I just received. Please add the following materials to this document: 1. A number of letters SBCS has received in support of the proposed project. Please insert after page 106. 2. Editorials published in the Chula Vista Star-News responding to the editorial on page 139 in the packet. 3. Petitions signed by neighbors and others in support of the proposed project. SBCS has worked with The Chula Vista Elementary School District to mitigate any affects on area schools. The solution is clarified in the District's June 18 letter (p. 57). It would be useful to copy this letter and place it after the letter written by the District (page 105) when the issue was still under discussion. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call me or Dan Marcus at 420-3620. Sincerely, ~/ / I ( \ i e,~ 0;7- Kathryn Lembo Executive Director &w<ne<l noart.by Attachments . unlad~ " San DeIJ> Ccuty ;2/ - dfq LETTERS IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT ~l-.Po ~l,n- --- --.,~, ']~\ lo 1~A~ f-<.y ; .\::=. 27, 2.3;<3 John S!le::arc. 346 La 3enda,'iay 8hula 7~3:at Ca. 1:~lQ ~i:"1 :'J'J.der 5.:ld '''::;::)-.1..'18':'1 :J~::..:;.~~rs Ci -c:r of" Ch~3. 7i3': 1 2'16 4 th .':..."18. Chula Vista, CA. 91910, Dear :hyor ar.d~ ~~dl. BecenMy I bec:'L.Je i:lt,:.:r'3stad in t~e renov3.~i,):l ot :one ~~o~')er'Cy at 31 4th ave. by So.th 3ay Community stirYioes. I understa..d t~at a pernit \nll haye to be ap)~ovad by t~a city cJ~,ci1 bafo~e t~is can take place. . I strongly reco~e:ld t-,'13,t ap:;:J:r':)~'.'.al i"or thi3 pr'~jdct ",'iil2. be l"':>:ct.l1C::Jmi~'l0 i"r,):L c~le ci-cy ;;:L;,_"cil.. For the past ye:J.r I have bean in'To1vad in o""inga 'l'ransitional housing" sponserad b:,' the i:ltarfai th ahel ter net ",lark. ':rhis hOllsing along with interfaith transitional hOllsing does not appear to have a nega ti ve effect on the surrJ llndi:lg area. The reasJn see;'lS to be that all candidates are very well screened and must abide by strict rules or they are out of the program. Today r questioned a friend of mine about what he thougnt about the effect might be In the surrounding area. He felt that it night be nef,ative,since people pU3hin~ shopuing carts around, such as ~he home less do in San D~ego,~ould be in evidence. r thini( tlle abo'Ta is a picture many people haye of th"! homeless and is res~o~sible ror resistance to oheir coming into an ar~~ to live. r doubt that the people selected to live a 31 4th Ave,ir the permit passes, would a~pear much difrerent from the ~eo~le all re~dy living in the sur~o~,ding appartnents. There can ':Je no dOllbt about the need for t~3.nsiti;nal'::!ou3i:u fo!:' ':;he hO:'leless in the Souti1 3ay. I ;lO~e that YOLl will c~ms'.C:3:' my- .:oC'3..S0ns f'D= se;rir.g that :,hera ','/ill be no negative impact SI':..Jt:ld. a pernit be issued for the above renovation to provide tQiloiticLal housing. rlease grant tb.is permit. c?--l - d-,;)l ~~V' /lJ s~cere~,/ / v~"" /ufl.l-7<---~L J:funr She para Jamcs W. Mllhle, cr..;,: Marl J\:,€-2 DJrfcto,- / t .~ . 619563.0771 INTERFAITH SHELTER NETWORK ,\ \ \, , \ A,I"f ,IJ March 1, 1993 Honorable Mayor and City Council CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Ave. Chula vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader and City Council members: I am writing in support of the proposed short-term housing program being proposed to the City Council by South Bay Community Services. Interfaith Shelter Network is one of the only general shelter providers in South Bay, annual sheltering about 40 people for 1,000 bed nights from November through March. We support the addition of more permanent shelter so that it is available to residents year-round. Short-term housing gets families off the street and provides shelter for those on the verge of becoming homeless. Supportive services, similar to those offered by Interfaith, provides comprehensive guidance to families 50 that they can become housed again and achieve self-sufficiency. Keeping families together and off of the streets saves cities and society money in the long-run, in addition to being the right thing to do. We hope you approve South Bay Community Services' proposed program and funding request. This will allow their agency to leverage money from National City, the State of California, HUD and other resources so as to make a real difference in the lives of needy families. Sincereld ~ /, , ~ ary .~ J 3435 Camino del Rio South #108, San Diego, CA 92108 Administered by the San Diego County Ecumenical Conference 5upp,:med P)' rhe etr}' and Coutln' or San Diego, and by priV.3rf conrributions ~r-''''', 1..1 " (~? --I..;r.,,~ .; It y~~ ,;'-.-1" I t<?o\ I , ' \~ M''] 1;" ':.1 , .J . . . -, ~~. ,~)." ~ ( ~;;)c;;r.:;2.- SOUTH BAY UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT JAMES M. STARK Interim Su!"rinlcndcnl 6CJ Elm Aven~e · lmpen..! Buuh, Cali/,'mia 91932 . (619) 575.5900 . FAX:(619).J24-9607 "Mokllng The FLltl.:I'W' February 4. 1993 r .~ ~,A . q.llt' Mayor Ti m Nader City of Chu1a Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chu1a Vista, CA 91910 Dea r 11ayor Nader: On behalf of the South Bay Union School District. I am writing this letter in support of the efforts of South Bay Community Services' to acquire housing units which will be used to house homeless South Bay families, Shelter for homeless families is needed everywhere: however the need in the South Bay is especially critical due to the fact that the only exisiting shelter is for troubled adolescents. We are also pleased to note that South Bay Community Services' family shelter plan includes such services as job training and chi1dcare. along with transportation to properly access these services. We urge the Chu1a Vista City Council to approve this proposed program and request for funds. Sincerely, ~~ Renata Chase. LCSW Support Services Facilitator RC:mp B0Jrj 01 Trustt'Cs: EIna F. Aguilar . Alyce Arnold . Barbura H"pkins . Brenda G. Latham . Patty Sage c9- ( -;d- d- 3 .7~pV ~ ~ t/Ty ~r ~ JIt~/~j ~ ~ /} 4. ~-Itc d~. c &cL~j j/~, &... 9 !'. 00 ~ U w m n-; ';F-o---.: It.. ; I, I 'r "," I ;" -, ',-. .. ?11 .I",1_~~ , , t,' ~ , , '7"P"T/ /U l(-e -j- Co tlL, ~ -(?7 --k/ ,1f- f2-\ ',-1':;" ~ S; /99.7 c t. ,\.; ,,-,J ~ )J \f A ('0 !, ~J .J \ .j) ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~.dL> ~~e'''lee. ~ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~<J..~,7:~ ~ ~. ~ ~. ~ ~,d.) ~ ~ ~ tb ~ &f r ~~ V~?AJ :0:-- ~ ~ ~ ./rv .z;tv ..,,'#~44) ~~~~ r ~ ~. J2~ ~r~ ~:z1d)~ ~ ~ ~ /'u/Ja.d:. .I ~~ ~- ~ $ I -(3C3'-f \\\~~1~ '" ~~.\ '. 'x: v' ~(l.~ t'" el (v'~ v-t- xv' ~~ , ~ ~ ~ , \Ii I \r~ ~' {y"-' l~Jl{l f San Diego Hunger Coalition 3255 Wing Street, Suite 109 San Diego. CA92110 (619) 223-7101 4 - l~ 26 February 1993 Mayor Tim Nader Members of the City Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista CA 91910 Honorable Mayor and Council Members: I am writing to state my support of the proposed short-term housing program being presented by South Bay Community Services to you on March 2. Your Council has recognized the need for such a program by making homeless housing a top priority in the recently adopted Housing Strategy. You well know the numbers involved: 350-500 607- only 8 Homeless persons in South Bay Are Families Shelter Beds Available in Chula Vista Knowing the good work of South Bay Community Services, I strongly urge you to approve the proposed program and funding request. Sincerely, A~~er~~ Executive Director ------ c:J( -0';>5 i \ \ /11 /~/' ",,- / \ / ",,/ v I" 'I-- . ~o.t C7kJ / \1'\\ Judith Johnson 3656 Louisiana Street San Diego, CA 92104 March 18, 1993 L{ I \.&J .0\ vJ .,.. ".,. '-- _ ......J\ \ I (~ \. Councilmember Bob Fox City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 +,;,"I_,""-t c.\ l>('ar Councllmember Fox, I urge YOll to strongly support South Bay Community Services' request for short term shelter funding that will be on the docket for th(. March 23rd City Council meeting. In my extensive experience with homeless families and single people In Chula Vista (three years as the coordinator/caseworker at Project Hand, Chul" Vista and three additional years as the supervisor of that program), I fuund there was a great need for a shelter In Chula Vista. All C'rl.dible surveys show the number of homeless people In South Bay exceeds 1,000 and my hands-on experience supports this. Obviou sly, this Is a difficult population to quantify and people who are homeiess do not limit their search for shelter to particular jurisdictions, but the absence of any year round shelter in Chula Vista places a great burden on homeless people with significant ties to the City and on the adjoining communities that provide them with services. The program South Bay Community Services will pursue given Council support would provide short-term shelter and needed ancillary services to families who have the ability to move to self-sufficiency. The constellation of services that would be brought to bear on their problems will support families in their efforts to become socially and economically Independent. These parent s and children certainly deserve the opportunity to become productive and contributing members of this community rather than continuing to draw on resources. Far too many homeles snes s. their Issues. Chula Vista residents must face the problem of Thank you for your concern for these people and c? ( /.:9,;L lP '.',;.::h 17, 1993 ~"2; 7 , \ \l:fo"' ", . Iv't ! } '\ \l);, 1\ . \l( Chula Vista City Council City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. California 91910 Dear City Council: I am writing as a concerned citizen In support of the proposed short-term housing program being presented by South Bay Community Services to the City Council on March 23, 1993. This proposal is the result of a three-year planning process and needs assessment by highly respected local community organizations. The program is structured very efficiently and is ideally located to serve its target population. There is a tremendous need for this program because many Chula Vista families are homeless or on the verge of homelessness. This Is not iust a oroblem of our so-called "poorer cousin" communities to the north and south of Chula Vista. Please approve this program and funding request. This will allow SBCS to leverage funds from National City. the State of California, HUD and other resources to house and serve needy local families. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, en R. Googins 2360-C Greenbriar Chula Vista, California 91915 .~ jIo. c91 ~ <:9.9 { North County Housing Foundation A nonprofit housing development corporation @ March 15, 1993 Mayor Tim Nader and Members of the City City of Chula Vista 276 4th Ave, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Council: . Dear Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, l!" -, [0..::...:. JrW. :~,:: I . L . t ,;,-", I .. , . C~,--cT~~ "CLJ"-~'- '.:'- C""IV-o) . ,....:..~ v;'~;:.~. C/o I understand South Bay Community Services is proposing a shelter and transitional housing project in Chula Vista. As an operator of transitional housing in Escondido, I applaud their willingness to pursue this project. For years, the South Bay has been the county's most under-served area for shelter resources. When we proposed our Las Casitas project four years ago, one of the primary issues was whether we would be "attracting" home- less people to Escondido from other areas by providing a place for them. I assured the council at the time, and can verify now, that this is not the case, In the more than two years since we opened our project, we have only had one family referred to UB by an agency in San Diego - and they originated in Afghanistan! I i':>hould mention that this family has obtained employment in Escondida, and are preparing to move into permanent housing here. They are already productive members of our community. As I'm sure yoU are aware, homelessness is a transient i':>tate. We have had many families in our program who have lived in a variety of addresses in our region over the last few years as they struggled to survive. Families may lose an apartment in Escondida, live with relatives in San Marcos, stay at a church in Poway, before ending up in our program in Escondido. Incidentally, five years ago in a previous job, I surveyed the downtown San Diego shelters and found that a fairly high percentage of families checking into St. Vincent de Paul and the Salvation Army reported a previous address in the South Bay. Because of the large number of shelter beds in the City of San Diego, it is far more likely that a Chula Vista homeless family will end up in San Diego than the reverse. Please feel free to call if you have any questions about our project. I hope that you will support South Bay Community Services in this project. I think you will be very proud of the result - I know our City Council is. C'-in("f'r'~v ~B ~~'d Executite Director 465 E. Grand Avenue Sle B Escondida, CA 92025 (619) 432-6878 432-6883 fx ;/1 -dO~ /iLu '-Mt ~~,\ WELLS FARGO BANK ~" ~ MICHAEL GALLAGHER Vice President Community Development Department 101 W Broadway A.....enue, .300 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 238-6356 March 11, 1993 The Honorable Tim Nader ci ty Hall City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader: I would like to express Wells Fargo Bank's support for affordable housing in Chula vista and the project South Bay Community Services is attempting to realize at 31 Fourth Avenue. Wells Fargo is the largest source of private finance for affordable housing in the State of California. In developing expertise in this type of lending, we are very aware that we can bring private dollars to bear for affordable housing only when local and other levels of government contribute subsidies.' Government contributions cover the gap between the debt service an affordable housing project can support and the additional financing necessary to create below-market housing units affordable to low-income people. The creation of housing for homeless families, combined with numerous services nearby (job training, child care, Head start, literacy classes, etc.) will make a major contribution to addressing some of the pressing housing and social service needs in Chula Vista. We hope that the City government will be an enabling partner to South Bay Community Services as it works to realize this important project. Thank you for considering favorably their request. Sincerely, ?n,v?t~ /J~1i-- P"nleCl 01"1 Rec.,eled Paper ;;)r - dd-q Councilman Leonard Moore City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 rf-0V- i e~~ ~v* ! ~ "~.~' [~l~T~~ I' . UJ! MMl L~ (;1:1'(;. ~', -i', ~~ Of '\' -~:I r -0,) Ie- ' , - February 25, 1993 ----.- Dear Councilman Moore: ,<,'\', -1 ' 'lO' A \'2 1>(' , ",' , ,r I, ...JI" ,t " I am writing in support of the proposed short-term housing program being presented by South Bay Community Services to the City Council on March 2. There is a need for this program because many Chula Vista families are homeless or on the verge of homelessness. The City's Housing Element estimates the number of homeless persons in the South Bay as 350-500, of which 60% are families. However, the area has only eight shelter beds (and these are for youths only), compared to over 1500 beds in other parts of San Diego County. The City Council recognized this by making homeless housing a top priority in the recently adopted Housing Strategy. Local service organizations, including MAAC Project and Lutheran Social Services, also recognized the need. This proposal is the result of their three-year planning process and needs assessment. Short-term housing gets families off the street and provides shelter for those on the verge of becoming homeless. The project offers services, like job training and child care, designed to meet families' needs and help them achieve the goal of self-sufficiency. Short-term housing is not for drug addicts, the mentally ill, or people unwilling to work to change their lives. Families "graduating" from the program can move next door into SBCS' transitional housing units, and continue easily accessing their support network. Dollars will be saved through operating efficiencies such as shared property management, case management, and administration. Additionally, transitional housing residents will serve as role models for short-term housing residents. The location is ideal because it is on a major bus line, across the street from Eucalyptus Park and the YMCA, and within one mile of schools, a trolley station, fire and police stations, City Hall, off-site services, and shopping and employment centers. I am asking you to approve South Bay Community Services' proposed program and funding request. This will allow SBCS to leverage funds from National City, the State of California, HUD, and other resources to house and serve needy local families. Sinoere~~~ ~ '1 -Z~j -", ~. d ( - ;;L.3D (%~ ' 1'6 ~~ <Vudb ~Z (J ~ T/7/ll FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH 1800 foot 17th SI.... No"onol Clly. CA 92050 (619) 474.2254 -_.--.- --'I ~ '-1- e \!l .~~ ;i . t c..-',b! ~ ...~. I~-- \ ; , y'\ March 9, 1993 :v t f x , .~ .:~.-~~-_.- ...<.....- '\. \'" City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA. 91910 Dear Councilman Mayor Tim Nader, We do favor the short-term housing program proposed by South Bay Community Services. This is with the understanding that it does not include an attempt to deal with drug addicts, those mentally ill, or. those unwilling to take work when it is available. It should be truly short-term and should not graduate into something else used to support a host of bureau- cratic social workers. Our understanding is that such help is truly short term, temporary, a stop-gap measure and as such we are in favor of it. Sincerely, ~y~ Albert L. Young, Minister '. at - .;23-( 'l~ 50 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 422.8354 FAX (619) 422-4412 Boord of M.na~m.nl 1992 - 1993 Larry Cunningham, Chair VICe Chairs Pam Smith Sandy Murphy Susie Conners Chuc. Day M,.. Pradels T. Pal Cavanaugh, SOCletary' T 'easure' Penny Ailen, Pasl Chair Memben: Vince Acosta KE'~: Baumgartner M ,.,e Beyer Don BlInd Joanne Carson JR Chanlengco Norma Col<.mga Meh/ln Cowherd Greg Cox Ma'Y Lynn Dedde" Gen Dililngham RICk Emerson M,~e Fmch 00:.;; Fw;ler Fi~to€~, Ga':ia Ke", Ge~l~'Y Fred na'::f' Ca.IHc.,' E,' Ya} F.::c-€"'-: H.:: Ranlf h.,Jr,:er OJ:;', KoJ ArlT',a'idc Martinez DB"'I Menjez Da..e Mi:t'le!s,n Ken ~b~son h!e: M;.::re Ka!~,~ Fa~~er Ken Screelon Ar. Seli;'en John Shockley Jr, M D Bruce Sloan Pal~jcia Smith Dr Johr, Vugrin AlcWllllams Bra,~ Wlisc>n Tma Williams. ExeC\JIive Director Heritage Club Pen:"lv & David Allen March 4, 1993 Mayor Tim Nader City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 \, S . A 1.0 , , ~ Dear Mayor Nader: I am writing in support of the proposed short-term housing program being presented by the South Bay Community Service to the City Council. There is a need for this program because many Chula Vista families .are homeless or on the verge of homelessness. The City's Housing Element estimates the number of homeless persons in the South Bay as 300-500, of which 60% are families. However, the area has only eight shelter beds (and these are for youth only), compared to over 1500 beds in other parts of San Diego County. The City Council recognized this by making homeless housing a top priority in the recently adopted Housing Strategy. Lo"al service organizations like the YMCA also recognize the need. Short term housing gets families off the street and provides shelter for those on the verge of becoming homeless. The project offers services, like job training and child care, designed to meet families' needs and help them achieve the goal of self sufficiency. Families "graduating" from the program can move next door into SBCS' transitional housing units, and continue easily accessing their support network. Dollars will be saved through operating efficiencies such as shared property management, case management, and administration. Additionally, transitional housing residents will serve as role models for short-term housing residents. The location is ideal because it is on a major bus line, across the street from Eucalyptus Park and our building, and within one mile of ,schools, a trolley station, fire and police stations, City Hall, off-site .serYi~~~; an.d. shopping and employment centers. /.(',,">Y ", <..<"~", I am encouraging you to approve South Bay Community Services' proposed program and funding request. TIlls will allow SBCS to leverage funds from National City, the State of California, HUD, and other resources to house and serve needy local families. Sincerely, . ~w. tJ~ Tina Williams Executive Director d{~d33 EDITORIALS FROM CHULA VISTA STAR NEWS ~1'd)Y ';~~. ':~;'~' ~ ~ ciJ ~ tt-) ~ It . ~,~/. '< 1:7 :l> !:::: ?\:I - ,r~' ~~~,~i~ .:..-- ::--i~:t."'::J"I~ ~~~~",'li .....,,~-~~~ "i~vt'tl -.. "i ~ ~ -- . - ... -'''0 0..... ::..., <-- =g?~C'Dtt -.=..... :::::r';:E .... 3e-'<c-::r'1:"'O'- ~ ~:::S~~. =... ... '''';;co Ul ::; ~ g ......-. ::I ::I = V. _ c..~ ~= - v. -'''0 :; ,,"C 8::. ~ ;:: i!.- Ul::' ::Ul-< '<_ ~~..... ~~ ....< _ E ('J ;:::' S' =. ::I Ul ~ atl ~ ::l 0 ~~ " ., ::I:; ::2:;.. ~ -(5 :::'-' ~ t:l v. t; .~ ~ :::. E: ;;.. - 00 !r.:l::::onUJt.' ":;g3;>. 3g;:l~:=M='::ICfil ~;-~Ui;::.::rCil:::;:-~ -.v. C'D ::rm ~ t::l::r' := cr.:!"O C'D ;::Co:l Q:I cr:; ~::; a: l;:l c.. -g -.,< -s' t.l "t:I t:l _. _.::l ::r3::ro,<S:::lO":lQ g ::..:'s~. ::I. ~ S 3 ~ 1"5 ;;'V,:::l o~ - t/) _.~ O' ""i ~ 3 0 ~ ::.~ =. a e.:; = ~ Ul... ...... en _.:::l .... ...::; C'D ~;;:::r' "'O(;l t;"t:l = o..'<,<C'C .g !!; G. ~ ::. t:l rn ~ =- 0 ~ i~.:< S' = (;l 0 ~~,<cr. 3~:; -.(D :"1m 'c; _.(;'c.. g~~d.~ =?S~o . .....""'1...., ""1""'1 ~ ~ ::--=~ 0-:..... ::l()'Q()'Q ... ~ !:e ~ (/l .... rs'"cnt"": (/l=~ (/l "0 ~ Vl "'0 ::l" =-,..,~ ~ --- -. _-:., --3 ~ 0-' -: ~ -: ::l ..... ..... .... .... ::l ... o ,.. - ::l - (/l - o :: '"" - ::l ()'Q (/l ~ ::l - ~ - ... ~ ~ (/l - ~ "0 o ::l - - .... ~ :; ., Vi' - o ::l ~ ;:~c?"'==<s -...... ; "? :::. :5. ~ g 2-< :j ~ == E c; t=;; :: ~ ~ n -::= r. =. =- '.:..:: u;' IJ"::l t.l C.., ...... t; - (';..... :::l:;l:::: C .€f7.., I.f;. :-.;; n. ::.,8" ~ ..... 5: :::::: =: 0: :r:: r ~i~.' ~o-~~ ~_'..g ~~ -.--- ~- ::<;::2..,. ~ ?5 ;:; .., ex;:::: '... _ =. r: ::::-;0;-, .c'< x r: ...... c:.... t::l,....,-- -:::: 0 .~:::r _. :5 ~ c !:S _"""I =t";l:::, ::l"""l-:5 2. :;'" c- -tR- n> ~ c... :::::"::: ::; C Q W _ "< =" _. ;::-' ... ::j t:l w:::: t't -.::::....... ;: ::::~-...l tr.':; 3' ~ <~c.n Ul:;;~ ;:::og-67r:u;\,: 'g::::::;;=-::g22~8 '::-::c5g-:j ;::!~~-:eg~-e~=~:jg -<~,(; ~ _ t; r5 - 0 f;. (t.." Uj' ~ ~:- ~ s (::5 u; ::.~ u:: z-,..:o.... "< en..;:,'\': ~ _ C': . (")...... _. u; V'7...... 0"<".:.. v. ~;:~ ~.tg.~ ~~[ :t~-~ u-. t\;. ~ - to: _ '. c....: - _ ~o..:;..e.. :i= _-.J-:; ~ s.......t:;l '< -.-. -.J <:: = r. C? :::: ~ --..... =--- -:::::" -u;.~u;c..=>2. Ulee?'; ::.; '-':::: :..-:".:. - ~. -.0 '-' """l.., """l 0 0 ..... ;:.: r.; ;::! C'"' rS ..... =- rn 0 -, c':< - -.cr:::.., _...... ;::! c- 0 x .g 3 ~ ~ .. C;O i5 c.. c.. ~ ....3. (?.... =i'::E- "*-.....(:> Cl'JVl_ ..,::soroc.. :n ~< t:;l"-t:l ~Z3~-EIP~~~~~ ::l~t:::l~ --;;. ""'l ~::::'l'"'o"O~.s:: ::l ~'< ~::(")~O.~OOCl1:::; o-:;~ (": ~ g- =- ~o ..... 0 ~ 3 ~ roO ~ 0"' 01 -;: ~tr~ gg'=o?-~~ ~ 2..~ g '" " 00 '< " - - " 00 ~ 2_ 2.t~ .... -.... -~~ g ~.~ ;= ~::;..~ - -- ::: =-:-: _: ~ <.0:: ~ g::;:. ~ =0 f s, 15 ~ 'g ~ S. 2. ,-., 2.. rs_~ c-_~ ~ ~ ~.; ?S s.:::r:=_=z>=c~~ ~JU'-"'" -~ - -, -.;- _-:::::- """l .s """l Ul ::r C-~="""lC~~_U::~~0~ <....u::~ '<v.<:; :l ... 0 =. tr.' ~ e :::-:::: /':' __ 0:::0 C? -.... ::l "0 t't C":' C? C_-.' ..... ':;j Ul - '"' v:."""l S. ~ ~ :j =_C:.::: v.:. 00. r; S ~ -j """l Otl.....>t::O'c:~F.".....s:;... ~ ~~::l...:.~ <::.::=-:::; :::-'<g<~"'"""l<~c-r:c-ootl~~""'Ctl(:>~CO s.~~g_c ~o_ u;-cx ~nc.. -=. ill; r;;;: . :r. :;:: d / -~3.5" r< (e ~ ~ (e ..., TJ). ~ o ~ =- (e (e .-. - _e ~ o ~ .. = -. o = , I ! L :~ ~;=i .~~ 3 :~ ocus ...........-.-.."'.ews '- :- ,~___-o:..:,_.;- _ -.- -,-~ --::-: - -_: :_>- - -. -.:: __._ - . ','''''-''nesday,'April;t4;::t993-.' .',' "l111c:.;..;Jaal":"l' . _.. _ .~ ".T . ., . ;VWa::u: - -- Lowell BLANKFORT 4. >'~ . n.., ifJI(~;[~ . '~......'.........' ~'.": :.. 'fl' ~;_~F . . ....... /~., Off My Chest Home is where the bundle is Jim Strong is a neighbor of mine in the two-story building on F Street, catty comer fro", Chula Vista's City Hall, where I have my office. I use it for writing, studying repons, paying'bills, making phone calls, seeing people, Jim sometimes uses the building for eating or thinking; when it's warm he likes to sit in late afternoons around the waterless na. tio fountain and stare into space while he smokes a' cigarette. But mostly he uses it for sleeping. Because he's homeless. This building, bought by the City ofChula Vista a few years ago, has been a refuge for the homeless from berore then; as Jim says, it's quiet and private and sheltered from the wind. Several WInters a~o, ifI'd come to mv office when it was still dark, I'{find twO to four homeless men curled under coats or blankets sound asleep on the thinly carpeted concrete ramp up- stairs or downstairs on the raw concrete. By last summer only Jim was left. He became a son offlxture here, a slight and smallish early middle aged figure, about 5.6 and 120 pounds, Caucasian, dark.haired, good features, unobtrusive. \\"nen I'd leave each evening I got in the habit. ofwaying good. bye to Jim and he would wave back. Then our reo lationship advanced to the point where I would say "bi" or "good nightrl and he would say "hi" or 'Igood nignt." But we never really talked. Then, one morning last Septer::lber, I came to wo:k early just as Jim was waking up. ~~'1C: I thought that.. as neighbors, it was about time we got. t.D~know each other better. So I asked Jim a little about himself and he asked me a little about myself He told me he was 41 and born and raised in Coronado, a:;.d that his father was a Na'\y' officer and he used to \'\;0:-:'.: as a dJ-1341 _,,V"''''', uo::::>..... ""H;a l\. aUu. J.U VL.-llCr PU::'1L.-1Ull::. UUL.- l:UUlU.U l. get ajob. And] told him that] was a "Titer and he said that. when he was at Southwestern and San Diego City College he liked to write too.] ended up by giving him a $20 bill "ith the caution that it was a one. time gift; he asked if he could consider it a loan. Last week I took Jim to lunch. I wanted to learn more about the homeless, or at least about Jim, than I could in brief snatches of conversation in the building patio. We went to the Black Angus where Jim cleaned the plate of prime rib, salad, potatoes and cake, wa- shed down by two beers. Mostly in answer to questions, Jim told me he sur- vives on about $50 to $150 a month cash he gets in small handouts he likes to think of as loans, or by giv- ing blood plasma at $15 a crack (except he's been tur- ned down lately because he's been im or through odd jobs like cleaning a nearby store. He says that at school he was a pretty good student in some subjects, particularly in the social sciences and French and ] test him and fmd he still can under- stand some French phrases. He had some psychiatric problems, depression and anxiety, when he was in his early 20'Sl he explains, but after that worked regu- larly, as a motel desk clerk, a restaurant waiter or cook, a hospital psychiatric aide. and in a library's au- dio-visual department, until three years ago when he quit McDonald's because of kidney pain. He was ruled ineligible for Medi-Cal and disability two years ago, he says, and the pills doctors gave him for his kidney pain seemed to make it worse and be- sides they're cheaper in Tijuana so he doesn't go to doctors any more. Relatives? He hasn't seen his thrice divorced mother who lives in San Die2"o in tWO years or his father, who he heard lives in laano, in more than 20l but sees his brother perhaps t\vice a year. Jim says he usually can get food at churches but if he gets together a little money he like~ to treat him- self to Sl worth of chopped liver at the delicatessen, or watch the horses at Caliente, alJ.d once wne!'l fares were cheap he took the bus to Phoen!.,. wa.'1dered around there, and gOt S20 there for his plasma. Jim doesn't drink. he says, except ::;.avoe an occa- sional bee~, or take dr..lgs if you don't co~n: a rare marijua.'1ajoint. He spends his days r::L~i~g walks. or going to the park in Chula Vista C~ Coronac.o, or rid- ing the trollt'Yl or going to churches. Before lunch, he'd JUSt been to a Catholic mass (thougn he's not Catholic) and shaved at the Salvation Armv. Does he have any hopes, aspir~tior.s for :he future? Jim looks blank and savs ncthin~. \Ynat if someone gave him S10,000? More silence..Sl.OOO? ":\laybe I'd go to San Francisco. That's a nice piace." \Vas he fairly typical of his fello~v nomeless?"~ 0," he says, "we're all different except fe:- one :::ing - we have nO\vhere to live," Lunch over, Jim asks to be dropped off on Broadway a..."1d I park mv car and from the tru..'1k I ex::-act the c!oth-;"Tapped bundle he had given me earlier. It con. tains two shins, an extra pair of pants anci a razor and blacies, all cionated - his only possessi;:ms, Jim says. except for a bla.'1ke: he leaves st the Conp-eg-a- banal Church. .... III used to have mc:e trjngs - a wz.::h a::.d my O\\il clothes G!1d a ,vallet wi:h my social securi~:: carci unci D. C4 The Star.News. Wednesday, April 14. 1993 Blankfort Continued from page C-1 calculator and my W-2 forms - but all kinds of things dis- appeared in the process of mov- ing around.. Jim's plight essentially has been caused by political decisions _ the Reagan-Bush administra- tions slashed public housing by 80 percent over the last 12 years, while simultaneously sharply re- ducing funds to treat and bouse the mentally ill. To their credit, some communi- ties are trying to do something about homelessness and, in fact, studies show that, given aid and steered in the right direction, 87 percent of the homeless will be off the streets and coping within three years. For example, Chula Vista's City Council last week decided to seek cooperation from other sour- ces (and National City j oined in) to buy and convert an apartment house into a vear-round tempor- ary shelter f~r homeless families, with volunteer agencies provid- ing therapy and support to get the families back on their feet. But the problem demands national solutions. And these will come only when the richest so- ciety in human history answers the question "Am] my brother's keeper?" the way we were raised to. When Jim Strong goes to church, maybe that's what he should pray for. Please see B1ankfon: C-4 ~1-d~7 PETITIONS IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT d( - ~3~ ...:...;~ 't June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone , , --~T - ~,- ------(~,..------~-~~~-l-J --;(~-----/------:~--)-----:-:---=---;/- .: ~IC f'~Lr_'.L', '_" :tj:2fl... - /.. /-, ~.~).1:t.,.~ ~'i.::,,~ \._..;..--;J~ ,~/ ____4-'~ .:j/',./ \ --~---------------~------------~------------------------------- '___' /1' - . / ,f, 1';"/. ,~i -.--. ~ -- I \ ,; I" .1 ,/' " /I~,. -.,..-' , y. -,r~.,(', d',-;li"rQ;I,l...':I.j (,_,.t., '"jlr;'~r,ln!.,'-~''' i'i:,"" 1'-_ / -':";":.,..7 !.-, --(-~--~---~-----:--~~:~-----------~--------------------------- :. .! /. b '.' . " .'1 ' ., ~ ~ /,II.,./):;~f I, li/ ~It,..; v'-:','-;.;! ,.,:<,:2. /,:.t. r..'~_/l':~A_ _,dtt;'" ~ 1/ /'.1 9:~~) - //)/ i~~--i-!y-----/--~---------------:----~----------------------- ~?r," L-,;1f/1 -L::. / / /!,', / / ' , ,..-c./- ,.,..., ~?://:<-~ ///1 '.-i/~/~~'-~-' _./!...(.f-' .,;',,,;,;:-,/:/"'.:t..rl ,7'/.,1 -1..'// .......,~7_/. .-:;:-/ (------------------------~------------------~-----~----------- ~!iJ!fZ.A....L ~ 1J..!_____:J-L!..11lr.1::L.lD!'-------.!' ;.___-'::i.i.~.z} 0 7' .'--"' 'I. d r!/ ,[ / 4'" !~ . j (' L I') " , ' /"-7'\'~"~ /-\IJ-..ULt; v~l.Cl_ (,) ,:J_' :;.;,..., ,../L H-f', ;/_ () ~ d' -) 'C (( ~ 1t~~~~~~;3i--W;:i~~~~-:iJl~~~7J~~k7J6 1L~-.2.:T---~----:EE'-~-.8t.:-----~)l""---~(Q.:--\f..\~Q ~/-) A f\'J " f+ tA_ -i- . . J;:t'[~.L~_l~0J.--'~_~_____2]_::._S?_:.s::.::.'-_~i:._~:~____(._';;::..___~~:L=:i"~~ 7 ~(~:!~~---_:&.-:f:{t.F:~~Lt.'fP-ff-J---(~--:-.-tf.5~Q-.2.?-' , r ~Ji,/.lLt'::"'At!.---ffQ~C;;fI!Uf1{'JZ.rLLd--if'Z-41t'7 ..h'"'rr(2~~--:J-f,.:t-J;,--~--t.b"'J~-S.f..~-t:--C~~~-7.1jl.Q. , ~7~--.:_~.--5J?J2-J?dLK-~-fJ.q--~=-:L---Y.il{[)* J~-~---------:J.;,.2-0liIeJ..O--~-----~LV.'--~LqL() 477 ./SI s;- j}j~yi~~_S$:;.~~o.b.""----~y-~-B.J.:.r.t.;d~1C'--A~~--~~--qr~Ll '1&.5:,'137 Co ~~_\u \... \n~')\\t\' '-i,-\I..j' \')', \"\Q '-",CD CI.\~\() . ='_'I'~_D..~~'>A.~--------.h.--"js.l:.g...~\I.:--~).\.:l------- , O!.,.;J /'-" ~ ~C<-~" -/A-/ 4J.;;<.6asr --------------------~-----------------------~~~----------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- " ;;J I -doC( June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Conununity Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing _.to work to become self-sufficient. ., Nam~ / / J/ Address . .~ _ FhO:; ~~_fdy!!:.!Zf--_t!:,-~,!!:::::'~-~jL:.---------f.o.:.1~:~-~.!'7' HtL.{.f':1.'-___~..L~-~~-~k~~:rL:!J;( . J~_________~'{!.L~..DL.2 7 .)'-fb~Z.:&.L(d.i0---./d.d5-~a-" ,d./~---.i!~------~6.=E(-'L t.-~~_\.O"'_~-'{~.1-_--~pJ~I~:.e..~}i~~~~ljl~~~--C.~\-J.~-Id-'- )1-\ J!J1Ll~t.LJ&'2..Ll.itJd:z-__:::t!.:2-~~-f..':L-?o_-- _J3i~LAjJlJJ~A4--l2J2-.sS1<LL~J.--c-1J[2----~---------- ....._!li~21.~_C?t'1l<f~.=.fil:f.-1j.sck-~.E7--'J&~S--l}JSk--JJ 7/0 {jf! cil-':li:''1'&-tr---.12..'1-~.;t. ~~:..L.!..l~_CJ'.it.:L ------------------ ~l\_~-)J~~-~-~-~S--~i:.tl[~--J1J.d,.~--UjL~ t~Q..j'.M~~_LLY!\.s!O___~Jz.':2._t ~t~~~__~-__~Id.:_'A__qJ_ctU____~]k.:7 :3 7S- :I~~f~~__~L~i1n___~~__~.f!}~f_..~_~.:._.L~.:._c;.B.:._qful____:!]~.:J} )~ _-rO~.e..svJ9_____dLJ;:_o_J..OJ0~Llsiltil{~-5J2~6.S.2:J{)~-~.Y-~.58' I~ __~()~_~~ 8S __!:\-~~.5__mu..._me-.Q~~~J:-"J: ;LGAG.q:s ___\[~~~~-~~1~~:.~~-~~~J~-l~-2if.-f6 ~~ ______~~ a.__~-------S---L~--.d=--- /Jj __~~-f:P.,(f!!N-7-------~~~--t:iL-g.fr _-1!i!.1JMiId -It!:-<&---6ll..2--s,..~~--~0 'iJ6 "1'8 __\6L~-c__\______kc:-L':.~T~~i5~J:L'-5-~-~~~~ 4 ~._<; u "" _~~C~~----3~~~s..'<5..~---;'.~1>='-! _ ~--~~--_LC!.----MJ.~!J.-----J:!:E"~3~b:L . . .;)...I-~O June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.. to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone ., Rl.JSlIlY?ouFTr- L(JI kl2./STfJ cT C.V. qZj-32J?7 -------------------------------------------------------------- J.x:-i:..._CO.ll.i\2WWl".?~-1JA.1--Q...c.I...Q.hi""='-''.J.j2.-v--0.L ::;.!.~_____LJ.1i-2::.S?_=I I", ~. (' \ ( -" . *_~_0M_~E.!2~(J.5~'>..-C.LC!!:.gL?!!..!.------------~:.::..1~.:.L II \-\.u -'l ~ ---, i\; Q" A /")' /}'" ~.... __ 'i\t20____1f-____-~)__!:i~~~~_ .:i._:. _L-_~___':L W~___.k1C_-.L~_"_L I . /? J /' .' -,7nua:id.J.'Mt.'c?a: 15@y';1t\.Ld ilu-J !/2(h36,te ---l-~----------------------------~------------------------- 0!':)__1z~.b.t-2~L-~~:bL~-J2L-?~D-.LB--~~9~--~-3..:~~u;,. ___/-f___~JJ~/JA----{q~-L~--!J~-~)LL.<;?lL.?t:.--~f.:6?33 JA-~~-di:f,{"i:.".J--.!~~J--~~.s..A:Y-L -S_D-_~3..i25__s:n~ -773 j //J. I! / iJ - , C' (......-" //1;'// ~ .; /J " - ~ ;f .' ,- .... - 1;~ 1~{('=:"'l.:.4.J:!:--.t~~~~':':-, ~~~~--, 'Zl:ti-::1!:___@d~~_:.._, jLL~!. - ~;! \ ~ (e3 ~ i:\; -- /Y6 GO ___ ~s::_:2:>..__ -:;~_;:.0_.!.::.?_~:-f_-:.3s..~!--~-L-~--Lqf:---::Y -rs~ 1'1- ~ - '-/!V j' - q,11 {Jr. ~b-(, ,\ (aiL II el, m l?r J ! ~- (I r.. n IrL . C!J (11 Of! t! 0 {.j2J-f,GZe -- ---------~-------------------~-----~- ----------------~---- '-/1 ".,,' ~_:'_-,-, _ ,-",,-,^ ~ ';., , .,~!- .~. 1 < " ,/', c...._l~)r---,r'h.~,..,-;-,- 1/II;ll"f. j!I'!t~_j I), _'; ,(Ij ,/ I ,.,/-._~.," j'I,_lj./' ci~~m~j~~~~w..1i7/LL[:j[jdO~Jl~Q~~~~~~1~~<?-~ ~-~-~---d.L,?--'i..1I:..tI.!!~-{)i'~k-l'lskI..VL----.f-t~:.I~~--- _ti:Ull-~Lae.---~~-'k..J!P.!f.--~j.J~--f~----'l.c}QP..~D . _L'h-~fCiLC!fL,-$J.~g~-:2.L-Y-~-IdY.ff.--f.~-i:;i::.--CJ!-- q:;?o-3r.. 20 ~___.,.iJ~1.-~np-"J~s--f!-B..~.?.f..f~-~-~~-~0.-0i:t~-!JJ,t-6 if~ _M~e\:~0..c:.-~y~~\.\n---~L~---4--g~~---~~L---Ch~~\.2.~q -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- . . ;) {-;)-t{ / June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmernbers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Communit.y' Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families wi11ing..to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone Jt:~~'u.c)jlM1L__g./I!:-I.I1-~1-1Pl!fl1~~~}-1c2LQR_--~-~?:%b 1 ~~_rtJiYz---3.L;;..k!1LM-f2.jL1jQl~---'iap.::~cXl <:Ii!--_f;~=::;~-'lXT~j/jJ#Ld1l0~i~~?r 1Y~ ~ __ ~~~______~LQ______~_____~____~_______iS__ j(S __ . __ };;[.4.I:.~__.i.?.$2--{2%t-,---~,-7;L--9!.:1;:?-::-q!:2;/ (Us- ______~-~':!~-!?.l..C!.~!!:.!!-~-~-~----!-?(~-=-5';L1 0 ?f~~r1~~cfo~-~~~-?tf;~~~~/ . ~~~~-~-----~---------------------~--------?:-----l' ~~~~E-bjjk-.f.s~.R.~_--~-Llt-~~~-(:.,~---<:1..-l3.lO "-I"i--'t. i!-~_~~~~---!-~~~--~~i-~-G';'~~-~~-\$.0:'-~--~J '7 t ?-1 . ~~f--'~~'i:f;-r~4~1tt~~l~;~i1E5*i- ? 3 ?)1 -;>~-----~~---------:-::-------:-:--------i--:----i-~-: , -- ~-~~--------------------------------------- ~_ ________1:L_J.:.iJ.2.~-<<C~:t.:2L~.:F.0-'11i;,~--S.i1~ I to 4 d- _~.:ft/; , :&6'-4___Y..JI..12:t:--~f!W.---!lj'2-$.?fy7 _ ~l- ----- - .LJ2('7..Lf~~J..2JJL!2_---"i/2L:;!'./7'~ p __ _~--~---r!J.._?-:C!!...J._-c:..!.'L:.{!t-----f.?F.. -it 20 _/d!J-~~'l.-.!:.!'Jjfj~~!.----:"~?LJ;[J...A':..".:;-J:~~df:-.YJ!J......~-j..!'2Lc.--(1 (-7'7 Z 7 _1tln~-~--.----Pj[5-~",-,.,:t>.....~-0!12.~~'>-i..3.L1IO __I..:_""'(____:"^.I'..c----~-':lUL\.~A1!.'2--~-) ~~Lf>! 7 'II'" ,. 'I '. --:l I -d.-L( Q June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing _,to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone 1!\\_~t\fit;"LUl_=~~t---~llJ--~-~--QB-,------Y~~~~; Cfj \ ~~~~~~___~~~~~~~--1~--~~~~-~~-G----_---~Sl:1~~:~C)-~~~~ ~~~__~~~~~~--~~----1]?---g:~Q~~~~~0---_---~~~~L~~J- ~a' t'Id_,.~J:C~-~-1nIlJ~f2-2~~~-----2~Q:.:{t'3 ~ ) 00' J~ &tMrJ/ , Lf7(-,'F;GS/ __ _ ' __ ____________~---------------i---------- ~/~~-rc _ w;.____';2_c:.~Ljj;J-~------!:tbdM:L ____ ___.a-,,~~-b-,=L&..C.q.EEL-q:-----~cz:.~~-Lq/?,;z - 4~-~ r:v1}?~~~:?--J""i~-t;-~)7-~{~"i-(~~~~----~7:)7~f-;c - ~-2Zl-~~------~--~-~--~---------------~---Ci--'-~-/' ________~----~~~!?-Jd,~&l~-rJ~-----?!-?~-~fj, ~L_ 7,-------f~~-!!!~~-01~-------~t.:~~"t, . _~, ,:.,' _~~~ C!:b~-_-_____;J.r.y~:s:~r_L/JN!/>>~ / ~ . CJ /#4:" +- ---- :..:--ji'Q--5:!J.~J!---t;.dI~l.dfi~U-----0- ~2.'22_ \ i, ~ __J.!:i3-U-S-'----r;;;)JvhL----Szz /~.::~~_ _ _ __1J___~e_IfL~JL:.(t-----?:.~ft:/}-2~2 fJt:tW-:P-JJ...~. e;.fj1Yl__:i.8:."'}_&!-{:..a'"~ft-Jl:!:.~#./L--.z2.l.2jS6 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- . . cJl-c943 June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, ,. We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay COIlUllunity Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing .,to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone /.P-~t_f::I:ht:aJt~_-Q1f?--I:kz.1-f-~~-(.t--Q:.-------'t?~:2:s Q _~~:1:f:~~~~----------------------- 1 '" --1-/ /)./j r-r/ J/ /i, ~ -9' ~q~~~~__~____~_~J~~~_____________________________~~~~22_U mECf._K_:D..elt.l!j5..d.Lf:!..2t:.iJ.f?.fE~~Lfiftfl~---~!-..~-~? ?S"F' ~--~~lir-,jJ~~1t:!~L~~7-h~~--------#:~r;-;~~ 4 -LJ____2.~o~~-l~-Lc1~-~---------------------~:La----- ~ ~~------------------------~jf~J(~L:~ _ __ __~--------------------------Lf-q[:j;?3~~- ~ ~~ 1f:??'1 V-.d;~,r" q/, .5,0. '1z/=>7 -::l?:../-gv23 ~~~~::~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:z~~~~~~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- .. C9 { --7-"'1.<./ June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing:to work to become self-sufficient. -.Name ,Address Phone , ~- (';11. J. ~. A.' I <- il {. ,I.' !0 r.5 ~ :2 , ,_~;~~~~:~~0~l__~1~~1__~~~~~~j~~~~!j----------_:_----~~:~~ L4f.dA_L~_tf..r~Ik_JJ_~(~(;tE~U.{:~.c..l':Ms~P..___~5_6.:f!fQ C~_~{~.~._._i1lG_-._t_-.1~E_~_l::::JQ1Q__5.~.Y.~_21L~L__~Z.L~~~:2_ , ~ ~ ~~~.d:'-LJlG2_~J~_'{U.~i:.k.l,;f.,12S_S~1:::_1=:1~Jr..2/(Q.{.Q05 - ~LC- f~iG-[~ff-~t~ij~7;r\9L-i;J!:~ - "tr~~~~~~ ~~~=:~~::;~~~~f-!; ~J- ~-----~------------~-~------~~--------------------- ~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- " c:? I ~d.l.{ 6.../ June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone h_~_:-~ld~_____~1:5J__J&_~_~-L_~~lif~L_~_f 2(0? (~ ::.-;> ?!:!-(;__~"!!.'=-~~f:.~___~~_J.."'!_fT;_ll;!~~_!'ff:."Et!.,,-~-9J.~i0}LJ99J . l:.'-"_'2,-~~~:::::~.3.;~__:.'~_~_~:.~~t~:",-'2._:'l.:.:.._~~~_~::.~e_.....c~--!~.:~~ '10 . <t i4() _~s:fu.~?!9~~~__.1~"2_J.?_~1.;..,_____$Th-~~Jg:"_--~-~__:t~J9~'LJ23. 9 -~~ 13 ~>I_3.~h~_____1.ii.J;_i!:.l~~.....___J:z,-~~J~h"<_L6.._.1wZ--I:./-13i-I J 03 /!1.,itt__.z.~~__'i'L~~_rf~!3.i5L.ji~-?f$--~.!J.i!!f+Qt-'7.<2-gQI.dg L( -8'/f.;2L{ ~~__ 14-0 (;.1. (("i1-i NDmOJ-l~ G-.J-.... 91"150 414--22:'2 ~Q::~J~~'Yit:~]~-;;ji,~-:'iqfi:,~~;i;,'-;~~i~-;i~~~~Q_/91 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- " c9 / - (94f I.f June 21, 1993 Hayor Nader and councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone citi-":/ ~?kI:1d/le=__4!J.p.ip!A~sIs:---I?,{------l:.!J?:.&.'iif? ~___ _ ___~~~,,_&sI,,-!l2~,,-,:!!Li.J2.~';;:!?J)L~~!'-LilX~2D 3 :3 1--------'- ______ _ __~t~_.?.!yY..!~_~~j..._:[zct__c.:L1~Jl_2C~~~ o? Cj Z ~.-- :~~~1E;:~---'~~~-:~.~=~~.--~~~-~~-~~'--~~~'-~~'3:~ ~!f ~ ~~~~~i~~Q-.~~b~~~~;:~;-;;;:~:~~:~~:=;;2-11~~ __ ____~~-~~~~-~a!L'1--{P~~ {"3 ~~~___ __S.lLC1--~~------!."2~~??_--Oi.!i.~LLS:.-_-~( -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- , , ~ I - c9'1/':f Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, RECEIVED '93 J1.' 2 1'l2:12 June 21, 1993 We, the undersigned, support the openi~g of s~.tit~~~~,ng at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Cornrnun~ty Se " will provide housing plus supportive services tctl ss 'f'amilies willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone " t~ { / '~:f!!.!:.l____j!_f:L" I/tf{/tt1~:d.;(,~______________Lf.?:~?~_<ffJ; 0 I .. . H1- i( G i ;>i.vUZ <, " . " y~--------------------------------------- _ (L,_._0_~-~9-?:--b--h~Jflj~~J~.r,-_--~-~~-.930~ i..~_~---?_5_~L~~.d.9~.l---<?c.l.KI.._--:fb-'2J.L--'1!-5 ; __ __~_LJJ_t--(JJ~~<Ae~:LC;!:!!.,____~3~::_1. J ~_ __~_MJ)..~~~~-----~6!:~!'(j.J-! A~?n._1i~--'-i.2--~.!.-fi.:'.!0-11!2A.L5J.jJ.:'~--121..::-~!.t! ~~_q:z~-t~31-_~~~LUi-tf~_,,!LL-12'f:"YL["L_.!i.ZJ':J1~J (3~_?JJ~.d~'l~-r..:z.~~.L~.2...J?P.:::!!l!:i.2k7=~~ '1 r ~~~__c?:.f!-_.E__~_C~Lc}2E--C.Y.:-i:J2:l!-.L~ ___L3.~-~--..2-I....l:1L!1-ci-ll...:~--<;X--i.J.?:-~.::j-qj=~ ___GARI{_--\Ahl11.(?J~t'---1[1k-4--6QTlwy:-~~--C~\L.--qJ.J:?:.~ ~ 0 ___~fl~__@L!i4i.-,JiAf:L ~_!L6~d!.r:z$ --~---~?:7--------~--------~--~---;---~~=~~~~:: ~~~'Y~~ _~-~J5-~~:da.-----~11--a3t-4.2-J).-~-~ _g~~~~---~~~-~~-----~-~~-j7j-1)~------ ___' ______~---------L2-t~~~---C~~---fLJj-C------ __~~J2Ll2~---~l-~~-~~~~~--~~y-~--~!~Lg------- _~'R.-.:8~-t2.z..'t-~~JLY---.9..L.<11O"--- __ __y:)__~~-..::j,-~~-ct'-~!:.J~~-(.-;Y.:-1L'lLa.- .. ~ /.;sv ~.fJf' /1/11 c::J I - .,.2 q 'b ~) June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone ~/~ /~.3~~~g:5'.R___~?X!?j'1 : (~ .~cAA>:______j_7t__-f/::..'--':.t:.~_~___c:..~~ l/ ~~ze~~~ ~~_ _____________~________::________________ _ _~1.:.- ____tf};I-_______.dJ.~__f..-5fyttt..-.LklL12id\- (' ~~~_ __~u/.::_---d..d-Z--G:2----S/..----C:dz~ t//fT/I- ::iLi~~~ L___________.kU)_,{~_[2::'__(,d\2~_YJ1T~-__'l11i (I __...df1J~: ~____________..Lf5:_?.'_PLb.L}9_._c....((~J!{? 1/ ~:t:. ~~~_____c:!f_~_~~._~:':!~_~_~__:!_()___~3~-? (f;~~ ",..., 1/ ..... I( _ __ _ __ _~__l~~___________________________________ n~-E.--~"7"-----fJ..~,uL-C;-c!..-'lL'l!-',L _,:.~_;k.Ia:LL---7!lJ.-~---ZJ..:L-YJJ.1JJIl.!1LJl~..LL '11 '! I t1 _~:.--~ ____liX..E:.k~~.2f1I? ~~Cl~ _ __-1lf-6. _ ~__t!_'{__~LQ1P__ _~ __ _ ef.--!'Lo- __ LC"IL"_qiJLD _ ~ __ ~_______~.J..~_.L2..~_____;.__b__~Lflj _ _w.__-t:~_____L~-22--1f2..~A-P..tf.--9LY.lj __~-W~---L~-Y..-~~-(k-a.;-~!/O ~~~_ __ --~_~:~~~~t"-f3Z"!f:::t:;/;;;-:: I q / D -; / fa J /Ii -Y1df7--' ::?J-..,IiJ~, -,.pO /!/j/ t2("?/C; ___ :LcJu.__f.JL~!l~z.---..,i..'-_:U.{~~----l....:---:L.../..f-!..- of -aLfCl June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support.the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone ,~~~-tJA_X.:1. E S +- _:~_..______________'ti;LQ.~rzLC)-7 ..~ ~_:_~~__M..1LW--r.1L---~Q-:'~~-33 ~~ (::::S6.~.J&&_J7..Q!2.!l;~~4!~~~JLf3.~:9.t3.G -:;;,Jd [M:1-d.c-z,<--e LC.="-~ ~lI'. ~-?:J~ ci --- ~~~:;:~~~A~~7.I;~-g""a 3d~ . d~~_______A,-~~f!.C~-------iZf.:~3( k/fC"/ . /.../ (' I 1/ I ' , (,0 ,/7() ~~- ~----------------------------------~~~~~~ ~____ &-cr---~"-'S_A"U:\.-~--~~_--A~-~-~o-c _ ~_______________~_Il"-L--k-~.dA:l:.~s;.Jt.--4:U? - ZJ 4-.3t. _ _ _____ __________~-~~~Cj~clf--~V--~L~16~ '._ ____ ~ ~~___L5.2~~--~-------- ~-1i-.-Z:~---?L~-~.?:7Z-~2-&/-----~~~:::!-~ --------------------------------~----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- , . ~/-C)~o June 21, 1993 RECEIVED Hayor Nader and Councilmembers, '93 Ji 13 P,l1 :26 We, the undersigned, support the openi~g of S~?f.ER~~lh0using.at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Cornmun~ ty seTi1i/;!$ c'[)rogram w~ll provide housing plus supportive services tJ.1 hdrtreIess families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. ____~lbj:IKtz-1-(Jk~.?1.-~hV1S~------1Jd:llS3 ~ -=__~_32_ __ _ __lL~L_Q(.,,-&:.._A~--c..r.....I.l.-'j.i....-t.---.!:J2:-j.=-Z.V7 ~L.~____t..~__Z_Sj.Er~~---~~-!:J.PJ:..:ZJ..~/ -" ~~Jb-_~_'L___~.::'?::-~'~s~~1j;)J!!1--C!:tlL~!i.0iJ?Z--)~~-?:}-7 & / ~L.;I~__Lfi:LC~f2~e.""d-!)fl---(l/k.<..ILJL'!.:!~-----'::!l:..~-::2-.?' J- ~iL~#__~'j'Li-.l:!rb~-E.....R~-'t~~"'-J'/~ 2~2tJ~t!~____~flq--ti~--(iJIif--s.~1J':'-'<1-_--5'.&:J~.!'f1Z ~__;?f~--LZ7}-J.J:.q,~~~-:}-f:..-Y...-'Y-(J.LL-!t.-!:-}-:-45 / S ~k~______~~~~_]!..J.4::.!=t-:!:,:.::-,-~y!:g{7-::JJ.~2t-!:7.9~J_(, 4-7 __4~TiJ..--,u:.-k:::;----j2~~-J;'{~~"!.--J:l~~-~1.:''I.-1P~~7-YJ-~:Z 01 : ./,'/; .~ /~~L /I J!-1 A',' 'il. c /l! I 11/-11/ /i"/;--)1/:,.." /' '"'-:_i:L...;..-.:..-'y.;/z.{:"'------./----J~f.L.ff/i...-..f/;:!Ji.---------------- ~_.L_ / ,~;:-~-6-~7rJ.q;i?Afj~~dJ2LZ--~I2--~?:E.z-2.~.1f-e@='2- . __~-I:Li'~~--l4.~:&..:J----Q-.L'3..Q--!!.t}!!!...t;k-G.--l!J..h::i1L-.~ tk ~)-{J 3 7 _~ ~ j ~-S.3J2~~-D~-~}~---~-D4t--:1}t 1 G~ _ ______----:11L~Jd~.:---~-'.L$..--j~1P-~-~!(26~ "'" 9 ' .- '-.. ~."'" .,__ ,'/~ ~ ... ~ -A-- _) --:... f ',; ----""-- c;..~,__ -'"'\._~._(,'\ .v..~--c.-...~, .--\ -::>r,_ ~- ,v ----------~~---------------~--------------------------------- Address Phone ., ~~----il3:Q.--l{~~r.<1f--f-b-t"C.B--i.2Jl~--2Y.~:(,.L(~ 72~_liZ-~---!f&JJ#!:d.~P%L1J.:Yj~--f~7!:'Ul<jjsJ;.,;, 7~ Y 11fIK_____~_______.l.J.J:j2.-i:1tJf>i.M4~lJL.-5.J;ti/2LI!!.!2----------2Jb- - b ~? I _~__~J--!55:L!=1-0~~~<i.---7._f2-'l?:1~5-----------~7..z.. _&~i 4- ~o " .;;J / - J..51 June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-te~ housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay community Services, program will _ provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families w~llinq.to work to become self-sufficient. - Name Address Phone t"..{q!A..~_~fIld~T=~.2.?=-4~~C~t2-I.~-~-.2.:f~-.L~- 8"~5-C:> ~Thc.._u.\.O~LCO,)----]12J:c.[!D_-~L.cJa.-Al~-?a~~JQe-- .JJr - ? rJf t)i~:::.:.~_ .!::'j_~7~____jL!J:-f.5-~=/':::!-_-A!./...::;..---M.:..~..-_<i.1.::1L'2--5/:;.1f? -(C 'f/ ,y '.'- . 1 . j'J~-':.-r.'A1!--" ~-q. j..tJill4. ~: - -01"1. ,... -z::l (0'- -'-;1.;zJ,~' . " ~_~---l~-_-__~~e-_6-----~--~~;--~~-----~]-~- _~-~(~--2:..o_.:.-e~~-.si23~--l:J:..-c;.-.-':f!.J_-'iL7i~t..---- _~--~---=---~~~-~~--~~I-~~J2_'1i2L2.L---~Z=-0;:[~/ ;!!.~_~ c;:- /,' - -U;-'S . - '/'" I) - <177-" ' -----------~~;t----------~--~---~~~~-~------- ~71Y (];;f..~~~-~~---"Mi-~J!::.-!!16L~L~L'~-;2~fu.-Z?t21 by, -:$ 315'.7 _fb_~~<";;.'.f--lliJ::~-\~~---L'i!,LDlE-3-.2~.1~~1~1:::--Q~.';r~-'!Ll~-- 2.(," ~~-5 bY ~~~__~~5..__~-.sL::B~'::)Jnq.~~--9.1t:..-~j.l~.LD--~Z -c'f- ~ .f.L~(L8___~d'_L/f.t];..A--~3!-~--1-H:~.2~!..-1..~l:..--f.Jd--'t.c]L3..L S/:70 It 907 ..elt.ZE!Jjd-b__llAo:..(i-A~___Z'd.f.Le..t2/~.J!C~Q-'22.!.L!I.. __'f~.:- </97' Y LLtJid_~W{.Il~..BL_J:kLIbta~--~J.if.p-ZcYJ..i----8.?-- /~~/ ..Jl1.:v.:L__0J:nd1(ld!.'-1JJJ1E--t.fZf.1L.P.t.;.._1/.;.L__1L~:5..(L~-l-/:.2.P..-;.fA7..9 B~0_<;;;&_~-_~S_B.QU~:t:lL.::S.-Cl.:t~S-(L-~1S:.:~)( / __ ~~f..___________.Jfh:J--0.Y..lEiB~!t:-jE.-_~I-LNVJ.Jf,*3!~:.:{q I _ ___ _..)J:.Q2_#~:;;/Sk..L_-:JJ22.--21.:t.:...21.1( , _ _~ __ :r~~7!:!..E_'5:._~d-c;.t!;..~~~i-~!..?'[;:;[.~~L ) / , (' ~ 71 _ _ ?2?:;Z~~t2I~-------- L _ _ _~_~x__~-i2L--(l..D;..ca-..Cf.2jj:l-/jZ/ /6.5~ //al/~ :;r 5 LJ (/'/ f?c7//Y " oJ I _d3,:2 June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, 31 Fourth Avenue. provide housing willing.to work to support the opening of South Bay Community plus supporti-ve services become self-sufficient. , short-term housing at Services program will to homeless families Name Address Phone _2._~_:! :.-:.i?:::___.L"-2._9:!::.f?::!:..i2~:!:_~!:!.2i.Y/L___~!.~-~ 3 Z 9'y <;:::~--L7-W ~.: ;./ &!!.!!.f!!:J:Q/@M!d~__~?2:.~I-j~~~LA~Lt'y-,-_1J:tLQ.____1}i=!_? L <'f _'Z/A-1.LJ/.JC_g./ZP.d.d__.I;!~__d.t!.:df,,:.#~/..y.s:a.~~Lcj'./L--7'a20~P{> <7,r A . 1'" .-. Vi"- ~ ___~~:::.~~!;t:i._~c~:':..~:L'\;:...__~L2___~":---(~~---~-~--_:z._--- ---.J -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- c?/- dt?3 , " June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. '\ Name Address Phone - , . , fl[\.:~f.r';.ltL~ll.!:___q45..:.D- _L-:k.~LW.fi:Lef~___c._tL_____4z.\:::z(,;2:..-(.)~ ~~E"{lr:~~:ai~Zl~~!i~~~~~~~t~~~~~~~:::t~~~r4J/."-'l g ". ~_____J.2Z3J,=J~&b___-__Ckl-__--_-d)J}.!!1?~- _~ L; "___~"!]_~'-~_,,,_~__~="j!L___~!~=!'.?!E _ _ _ . __:l':!:2.:-J.?_-Q-T.6+.Le~~-~-0-tl}'-t;-Q~ __ ~___ ~____~tf..-:2.__QTAi_t!t.e.?__~~____':!i3L~9..~9- __ _____ .LJUL___9~~&~-~-IiJ.__---1~j:~- _~. _h--_'iif:il~t~&---~j.::.e?Q:2Q.- Ji~~~~---?:fZ=::&.d~~--:iq[L:-;Y~-- _ ~~~_~~~~_-99iJJ--1t~-Lf&~~~,;-_~CL__~H.:Ee_- _ _. ~_r:L~~---~I{r=-Q.--~~-L~L~-ri0_--_:_~------ _4Ad.---[2-2-2---s.k.-Me.klC'd.--1.t?:-----:t?E.:~'?:~ (c~__{J&J.)ff.D----1J2.1J':J1OCJJJ;L---------------C€~:12-]j _flLI:ttJ'L'J.J'.Jl ___q!L-ED-c&tl:rJ.-L~l:..r;.L-~';:-~t:.----'i2.L.2.1i1..i:J ,/ . _ _ ___ __~tZL1~M..~t!..---'f~f.:~5!-2- C . _~'2'~-=?~~=L~rc;-'-!.--:!.~:-~-LLO ~ i/''''' r. 0 ~~J::r.n". r" <..23...1.4.~~.c.I/__,U;.~-=.s.L~lO _Ch-Jr~~~-Jl-~&J'f~-ftlhlk:.-t.;!!..--1?!..:f!J.z[------ __~~L~__12~~-~----L~Ll-td~!~-~b-~~JJi--~~~------- z,o ,,' .;2 I -,;)fY-f June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South. Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families " willing. to work to become self-sufficient. - _ ~ame l Address Phone -,.~~i~(~~~~~~1___~~2~_~~f~~~~jf~~~!~----------~!-~-~~!;2 -4d!A~1~~_JJ2Q_~tE~{~.Q.iJH.sSP..----~-?i.:f!0:2 /~~'{~~_mG_&:"t__1~~_j~_.B::!:JQ1Q__5~.P':_1~L~l__1d.l::.~~f2_ V____~~"'.t~-~.t:Xu=B.d='-l.-r.,12~-S.;.D-1~l~:fr..~=;i:/'LqY20S _ _ _ _ ~~':=__~";;,Q--~-~~---------'1tT~J-----?::~J.:-~.k'13 - ~~D-A~T.".{ --- ----~~O-Z"1 -' - :t1tK-Z~------~?~f.o ~~1t:~__~JJJ:J- -\.---------------~--~ 4 ___~_~Cf~~-----~'---,,;L~L-~-t.-~!:&-??.:9~-O y(J J, ---~~~-~~---------~~-----~--(-~------------------ i' -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- :J-1"":'cJ55 June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-~ufficient. Name Address \ phone b_~_:.~_L~_____~1:5L_JP.d~--f~_~~_Ci~.u-__~-Cj 2(o? . I ~ ?~~__?_~~~~~~___~~__~~~_lt:!~'!:_!E.."Ed...-~_91~i@LJ995' .!=~_~~e_':::=~~.3.=~__:::_7.._~':~'::t~:..,-~_~:.:.._~~'2.5~:..=s.':?_J..F.::__3-.!:~':. Cf 0 . 4,40 _~~lW:~Y~~~f..__1~c:?_~_~!.:..,_____~~_~~~___f~__j.?JQ_"-flZ 7 -~ '13 tp1_X~____3:Jl..J~_;[!.:_~---_..:f'!('<2.~J~b.",,_L6.._2.~J..s:l-ki- /703 ~Z~__'!:iX"_~~~.fod~.,#1-.a"i2*Cd$g9../?-'~-/?'.2~ . 140 W.llo'1'>i NcrooJ-lo-L ,.4..- 91<150 474--22-3.2 s~7i::,lJ~:__~---~:~7~J5;jj,,~~iq~S;,::tL;;;'~J..?j.iY~~~;~f}_/91 ~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- '. .d-1"'--d5~ June 21, 1993 Hayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. '\ Name Address Phone a":/ ~wl.C11f.(___1.LJ.p..i2fA~r!s:__!?d,------~~~f!j '! cff!i:--- - ___~!~:l&fl7!_!'1!J!.>_.J!,!_i.i!J2,_!;!J._{!f~_CB-X't::2" 3 :3 J________C ______ _ __~tt_3..!y_~!~.U2~j.._1:~__C_:'L_'i~lL~~~ - a? 'i 2. ~ -~J1 ~ ~~~~~~~_;.;~~~jJ_~~~~_;~~;3~c.~~-~~~2-i I~) __ ___~~-~~~~-~~L~L-~E:~; 13 3 __jl~~__~~__________________~_~JLL~____ ~ ~' -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- d I ~v?5{ ',' Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, June 21, 1993 We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will -provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing:to work to become self-sufficient. \ Name _ Address Phone /J-~tJ?jJJtflf1~__QZ!?__I:ii'?-.(-_6~_(.t__~_______/i.~~:~3 cs- -~~~~~~----------------------- _~~~--J?l--~~~~-----------------------------j!~~~~~~ j!}zA'j_K)leE~J5.Jt.~-1<.2t:.fI.efBt:?1B.!..rrftfi!---!t.!:..=--~? ?SF" ~-_~~iif-l]2-~1t~;'~~~7-h~~----T~it~?PJ~~ I.{ -L_Lj~,-_2.Jj{J{)1JJ.(L/JlJilL--------------------~1o.----- !:f ~~________________________~jf:-1C12~ _ __ __~--------------------------Lt-qO:j~-1~- _~;~:z!;;z--~g~L~!.:E-~i~-J-!::!2".J-!'~~~-?-;J-J7:-~~23 . 1~J~~--~~~ ---------------------------~--~--~~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- .' ...21 ~ )S~ June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing:to work to become self-sufficient. ) Name Address , Phone n-'-\J~:iliteLlll-==~~~___~ltJ__~_~__QB_.______Y~~.::~~ qJ \ ~~f"~___~.._~i.ZgU9-_-'l~--~.!.Qg.._.f'._,,;~---__---~51:1~~' S" - <; "-5" 2..j s;;. :\.>~~~\-__~;..':::~S-_~-----__-1J ~___S'J..Q.f'~_ !\':.~_______~'i...\::_\.. ("S:.'1- _-' v)d_",~J~(~",~JnI'l--'~f2-2.r ,__~_____22Q:.:~"3lP ) __ _' . _.k__::!{~-r. _ _~_____________i.?_C{:t0Jj/ _~Y!::_' _ _ ______'Q_~!?L.ij~i=d-~------!:t~.~L _ ____ ___.a,,~,,_f.:p_,=L&..C.f!_~EL_q:_____9:.<Z::?~*L.q''7c<. - ro-~ :-v~!?~~~k/--~-;-~-r7J;~-(~~/-----:;:l-7~f"-:; _ ~_~_~______i2__~_e-_~_____<__~_______~__~i2~;t. _ ~.~.~_____~._______~~p_>>,~bA&---~-----?!..Z~_~f!> ~9~- i_______f~~_~~~-01'1-------~T~iI~1:, _ . :/ __~1=fr?:JJ.LL-.-.-----dJ:.Y-:s:i::FL/JNb>>O ~.-JZ? - r-- --- :.___jJ.f:J__?!2~_{!___tdlP-4If.<;:U------.-~- /f~.o"~ ~ . r 1. /a;2.. 2 rq 11 ,I V j::-I ~2.J.;l_ ' _. _J__.:L~-..5..-i----c;;:..p.)ilL-___l;t. ZZ _!.~~__ _____ ____ ___2:t_~~~:.tt-----?:.~9::-t}-2~r t!t..1.~- Pd./P;J? __~B:..~_@~~tL!l:!:f:.#./l_-%?Z--2J SK' I~ ~7"'-=<' -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ;2\ -~ G'1 June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing:to work to become self-sufficient. ') Name Address Phone, :Jt:-PLu'uti1-M1J___~tf!.~&f41.fPf.2fB~?J~-1C}fQfL--~-CJ.~?DG 1 ~. ~~._tf,h.tLif:.z___3Ls:.JiJd1LA-LJ2.-i/.-CJJ!L~---L(3P:2.6JO _~.l__f..~___:'7F_'Jr.._~_Cl:-~__~_lj___LLI.l_Q___1-~)fo? 9Y __ r;e~c~_____\Q{Q=r..!:"qJjg/LL~~:.-9:.L9J.Q-flf <'13 __ __ ;;;-L~_~__.i.f..$2--~%l-=---~~h--~1;:?::Jf!:2-/{)2:S- ______ }:!!.~::.::!~_~7..c:.~!!..~~-r;-:::.----!-?~!!.-=?;:L/ 0 ~~~L,2:~~~i~~--lt~~~if; . ~~~_~~_~__J2~_~_~___________~~______~_____1' ____~caE--bjj-:ES~.R.~-----~--J'~~---'~---9--l-0:ilO ~ 7--'7'- ~!.~_~~~~---?-~~--~~~i-~!~~~-~~-\S-0:'-ITB:--_:iJ 7 ~ ? ~ , ~~#--!e~'~~~1~~J!1tt<f7q~;E;1~:5f~_ /3 2 ,,) -- ------- ~-----------------------------------~-------- -- ~ t- - ~:i9-----:::.-------'-:---------~-:-----~------- ~ ~ ____~_1.:L_J~n~~~~:t2L~.J:.0-'1.L1Z,4--:t~1-- I foct d- _.ff~i1/;. . :&if~___!.IJiL2:t:--~f!1/i~---!/ff2~.?~ _ _____ _ .L.ec.zLf~~J..2IJ1!2____92L.:7.y.;<, 5 ~ ,/F-1.b sr #:[ C I V _ Or f'ztJ -r! 20 JJ~:~~::Z"~~":::_;;j:~~7-..A~::(JJ.7.:Y;I\:~~=::::'f'-'7z 7 _~_~0~----P.!{)r.<=-~!::t~~~~11~L~f~~f-~3.i..!JO ~ __L:_-'O!(___-""<lC____~'~LkJ..J,~A.I!!,__~_, "::o!'Lf?.!' -lI;',1' 'I .' d { - d ~o June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families _ willing.to work to become self-sufficient. , , .Name Address Phone . fioSII fYlCJuF7T- LlJl 1r!.R../STfI cT C.V. i..fZJ-32~7 -------------------------------------------------------------- ~,-J:.o J132ru~':;?.:-1JA. L_Q...c.~Qb.ilQJ='_:1.J:.._U~_gJ.:JJ.!l_____tJ.Jj.z=S? - 1(", ~ '. \, 'n '- ~-M:JJC~'-??5..E.!!~t..S.?.-GLCif.3.'LS'L{------------0:.!.:::..J.::L7.. _LL~~z:.'"~~____-J!l_R"1S.~~A..~_:.c..1."'_~_'::7 )'L(Q___~ic__2_j~L ~ If? J /1 " -.( nCim{.d~'/(;tc?ec: JfX:)f"~tv_d#(~)-j i/;ZJ3-.3&~",e ---l-c--------------------~------.------------------------- Qc.:1__1t~b+--:2.~1--~t.J:2k-~L-2~CUA--~~~~--~-3..:~~u:.. _jft.;;:..-j;.z.?:J2~:!IiL--tq.2?-.J.1~---1J..:--~-L<:d/..-1.L--~Z: if 3.3 'J::f~~l:;-X:e..+.ut~^-l--.!Y.3S--1il"'ds..AY-.L <;.D..._~:..~Q5--:?n~~ -773 j V/;n' I ~ , $-;; 1 '"~ ." '" ' -' .If .' //t1. UJ/(t , /..e vl.1d!.ArDl''-'' - 3~,,~ ~kA".0'_~ &; j i-. q / '-! / / - II ~-;. - ].:-~\~-:'=--~;;-:~'~-s:=~---.-gS;--~~~--~-~~.--~-~~-.~~~--.~.-v f'2 I ~1~SJC:, --- --------~-------------p-------~------------------------ ~ - i V J - - -VA C'1 S(.,(.,-I., ,\ __ ~~io _L_~_[(IJf!.::.----.!-~~-S:~-1./5.J---(;~-(d-3~-i~'~-- __H?::.':3~12 j;~~~~~~~Wil~7/LLti~ij;)~9-~~~~f::;~ ~ik.-n/~---3.L~--'I.!;..tI.L"-:--Qf1~k-J:Idr:L.<VL----#-r?..Q.::~~~--- _t:J:i1D-~L02---~~-~JJp,jt.--fIf.~j,Nrfvl--f~----~clQ2.~D . _l~~~th.~L.-SJ.~g~-3t.'L-:L~-If.y~---c.~Jb-~~~--I)jL5:2'o-3"20 ~___.,i.J~.l.-~L,p.A.:'::-s--F!-B..~~.ff::z-~-~~-~0.-0it:.-~-!JJ.1 '6 ?J~S' I)' _h'G.~e:.:\.~s.-~y~l..\.\n---~L'2---4--Q\:&---~~.J:.---ChL1l.CL\l.~q -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ;2f-:2LPI . . June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilrnembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-suffic;ient. Name /7 Address _ '\ Phone d,/ / -P"' .:;,~. - f!; ':J, ~~~_~!t~____~____~__~?!_~_~j~~_________~_~~:~~~_~~J' klf~~::z.7;--r..L~4-~.::~!J~&~~'L:JGG.J~---------~'iL-;;.!-{!2 7 ~f'f/.:&R4d:~0---1l.d~-~~'~~!~-:-- (7 -d.______2z'?~ = K :::,-~ t-~_'_~-~-~~1:----~~\L~~:.~~-Ei~~~~l'"~J~~~--~~\..'-'(~-V.L rr \ J!Lt.I:?~?::~L!Z~CLZLL~2___~2_:9--i~/3___ _f51~LA1jlV44--1gJp-SSt<P.-L~J.--C-1~----~--~---~---- __-tJi~2.,t.A_C!t~<f~f-Ps.ck-~J:l-J:d&-'-L~_-Y12h--~j7/0 dfti ~t'J1~&:tr___J2.fj_~~c;,L.L~J~-~.lt.~~------------------ ~l\_~_./J.fll:b.-~-~-~S:~C:.lJ/..e.!:~--J1k!.-~--72:JLi ~.f~~_LL~.l!O___!:lJ:2.~_f~tf~__~.__~.:.~.:_'fl:.__qLqU____~]!?_:7 3 7S"' ::I~:!:f?'?:;'__~L~.on___~2__!:;;J'D~.f--~_~.;._L~.:.J.;.e.:.-qfuL---~]r::']} 7S:- _~O.sfJ\Jlg-----dp~-o-I-cor.e.LLsjlil'L~-5J2S,"d-Cf7:J.C~-~~L~5S' 1(, __~O~_~~\. es __~~~.5__mu.."TQfL.Qf'-~J:_J: ;lGAb93 ___\[~~1!td9.1-~~d2.~-2J:.~:.-~~:J.l(:LlL55.f:f_(, 1 ~ --r;;rr~~ ~__~-:J_~J..-1~~~--- ,,) ___7T/!/,~_If::f!.'fI~7-------~~-----_t:tL~fY __If!l.~ -e-f.&---;;'Q-7.--~~:r~-_~0 &(;;, C/8 _j6L~-c__\______~:-!~-~~~15~):L'_5-l:-~-~~~ q :>v.-$' u w- _~~~l~~~-__-3~~r-:-S;;~~'6-~---::'~~ _ ~__~~-.L-C!._---jj.j~h-_-_-.J::!:J~-3:2,b.:L }.kJ . JI~d.t02 " June 21, 1993 ? Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, !;:~ ,~. It We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. _ _~__~__-3H..._?.l/~,[f..J~~<s:~_?1-'-~l[J..2--=----_:':'_-- __ifJJ.'2,mL~<tv__IjoQDi.t_c~J:L01.L~'!___---___--Y..?2!_??- " if'~~~j/'Qg_~Ud~..eJ.l.-----!:/-2>-Z_-:2ffJj ( 4~d:.df:qy-,(===:_LL1W:.ljc..ro-fr'~L::::"I-----,.~~_LllC \../..!1~.#..__J4~__jJ.:t_rd.__f{MI.";'_<L_:lJ!.--__5!.~7!L~ _~~__~___L~~~__~~nJa_~.L_J_.2.__!/;J:.8_:.~'ji>:t.. ~G~;~~_}/;:eb-B~;.R.4...!Bli.Jr2~S~----t.f-~.laj'S(Q Q.&!'_Q~f_f~_2__l1SL6i:-~--~':'-_?_L.'-5_0., _~ ~J1CD-_Cu{fOZC-JlJO_L.L';l:\t'). ll:Q:L9all~_:Lzg-bqgg _ "-~1,__~.fLrj~__r2.tu22aL5U;U,=-_~Ie~-_.J..:n..ojj1.Ii.__WL~K~~-i 'sid,e" cL J (, /.l-t'3 Address Phone -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------.-------------.------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- ~------------------------------------------------------------- " cJ ( ~ c7 (jJ3 -:...... ,. 'I. June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-term housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Corrununity Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address Phone -' / -- 2- -~-----,--!;-------::"-~~--1)---~;~-----7------~-)-----:i'i------ r-",ll' "-! I' . , . '/I;~'(-- - I' '-, " I' ',i 'J,,'71- ",1,;1 r:t? ;J; -:'"' ~ /1""";,..' Y -~--~--~~~~---~-~~~~-------~~~-~~~~~~~~~-~---~--~----~~~~~~~- , , '-.,.'1//""\ . . ! / t: : ,;.j . '-, ----; ~.-. . \ i " A ,r j t' / J_ ..-...-. _. I ,. ' .' I -' I .J ."\ . I,., I, I ,I. f. '(..{. t.,;.,:J-.-..J;:""'-" ....... - ~ ,":""""'..../.-1..... :',t..)., ~."...' --~~~~~~---~---~~~~~-~------~---~-~~~----~~----~-----------~~ /;(f{:~.-"..:.I., /:' -' :'1-_; ;::>_~/ ..., <7:2 I'll /.:(:tii.,-t,dtL..- /-: //" /'1. 4/:~) -If;"'7 T?::":~-'Y;;----:-;77---------:----~~---~-:--------~--- ------~---- / ~//~! ~~{?'~ __-r.'-,>:--- ~:,/:y /;', ,:-"-:1/0;c.rl .-'i l//,;./,i/ .~-;t: / ':p/ ,------------------------~----~----.--------~-----~----------- . (0, ,,' I ' . j 4XJi:!!!:..~-~ b:..iJ..L____::z.U__!l1r.l~L_J..(;LL_______(;, :l.____Si.~_",;,.~) 0.'" >' "-'""" __, ' . I' . '/. if ' / / ,J'. ".;.. I~ ",' /'," 1'"7' / //;\,,_.:- ~ "i-'{{' L~~"L.i!/~~ !,;J'-.(_~ (i./"7-lc .iJ.-",;; \ _ l/ ~-r (i,~ -0((4 '" it';e::.,=~:==-;;3i.---_:L===4:J~::7t-;~kJj6 :1L~~~;.L2.T-__~____:EI;.I..~St.:-----~~~---:t(Q.:--~l~Q y"Y A'\CI"p t." +- , " J;t'E~0_ ~_~_:::.~,;.~L.~,::_____1::_:::_S?~~_::~:.~~::'_?:...:____(._'=!~___~~.7_::;.5..~ 7 -dY'('!~~f_---~--2.l~E/lJtfLt."fP-tf..J---(~---J..Y2~?.- /. . f' rgilrk!/z_-;pJrMtL-t-~-Gjd;t;zrd.~-tmL~c-1/c~-ji'...i'."' rF-7 ~t~b--::U~--"'--!L:--J:.h"j"--sf..C!.t~--(.-"'.-]L!lQ Y:.__ ' __ __~_~.--2fl2--P.8.Lt,-~-e.~--~:.'f~---~iJlO-=tl=- J~-~---------::2::;..3-0lJ~4!Q--~-----~L\L'--flLqLO 477 .151 :;- -L'i].ruyi!::'..f...__~~~~t.h~___~~_~_B_1.!.dJ~>::'__l1~<::---<;:.-~--ql~.Ll Cf,).5:-93 7 (., ~0 . . \u \:- \ n:J- \\t\' ~L-1 Lj. \J' '\"Cl. ,......\QQ ~\\ C:\J ~ \ <4\ c ;..... ~~..;lf":'.._D...~.~.~..~."...D...=:l--------1l.-- .J.s..___~\l.:---~\.l------- I'll __~_~j~_::::_~~-----~~~-':::.-----~~l.------- 4J.;;!. 60S ~ -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- I ,;)- I - .;LLQ-<..f June 21, 1993 Mayor Nader and Councilmembers, We, the undersigned, support the opening of short-ter~ housing at 31 Fourth Avenue. South Bay Community Services program will provide housing plus supportive services to homeless families willing.to work to become self-sufficient. Name Address phone ~.d:1?L~~' .r)_______-?L.:2-~~.;:.:.-S:.t!.5:.?'-~-"'---------~,zJ..--:k<i.!J.l ~~-~---~.J...L~~(2Y~~L.J..L(.------'i:~.1-Sl."7e~f ~ _ _._:-~ c.,_; ~~~-~I---Q-I--~-~-::~~~a/--'1~~:~~-D '1 ~ _ _ J#-_ !1L~_ __Ji6___~.IJ.L----,-----flA;L{3:i6 ""22?*-f:___:._~~--3Q.LJ:,-J---Q:.~----------~f.:?:.~f:[( s?liJ.~ .QU,<:ul: t, .~ __11i1~JiLttl:o~_.D.r.:________:L'lR:::-05S:,) _~_::_ _-=..::i.~~..!-oe-'.>:'---3-';"'L::J-.21?-~?i:--~-Q---&f>:.:\..:::15' 5 :B .c~e~~_______1-=,-~~_f~L..-~.,b.9-.(--"Ls~-!.--':iJ}-:'~~.21 _f2<?.b.._~-----~'i:LU~.~cl.~-~iL~.?--C~AEfM--~:LcJ.:.l,=:':! 1- _~+~bL__~:?:f1-~;2.L~b-frl--..-.DJ:::-~--.:-~-~~~:~--~3_3=~"E-% fL.,flNo- ~"'L<~..J .J!-L"t !"tt61bJ A'ICt'. . $b 'i 1.11 t, z.~" - ~'b'1.. 3 ____________________3_________________________________-------- ~":',p...VI...._..L\J~./""f p.O,ef l.:."r;';"3 <~.rr- ~-~ I'!/_' .;lS~-d-~~7. ___~______ ______________________________M___________________ - ~ /c!,)~ i ___:!-.!:f__:A:J'!:0:--.------3.Y-Lt2~i5.!---~.!2--.:a!f-:.L--J:f.~::!?H:..] l't _fl'!1I::L01'l~--_L~---5b.c:t-t:~:=~-~=1-- L..~.Lc:1L'1.LO-_:l~f=-12:b 76 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- '. . g{- ;/(PS July 3, 1993 RECEIVED Al0 :23 TO THE MAYOR OF CHULA VISTA, JIM NADER AND THE CITY COUNCIL '93 Jl 12 NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION TO STOP THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FROM ALLOWING A "SHORT HOMELESS HOUSING FACILITY" AT 31 FOURTH AVE. \j\~;l'. t. I'"~ ,-.',1 We, the ci ti zens and neighbors of North Chula Vista are vehemently opposed to allowing a homeless shelter to be instituted at 31 Fourth Ave., by the South Bay Community Services (SBCS) for the following reasons: 1. It is outrageously expensive. The cost for running this "home" each year is $20,140 per bed or $1,007,000. (City Council meeting of 3/23/93 notes, page 5.) There is alternate potential and less expensive sites for this housing such as existing apartment complexes; small motels; or bank owned properties. There is absolutely no reason for the SBCS to purchase this property for an estimated $720,000 and run it for $20,140 per bed! 2. National City is contributing for this homeless shelter with the understanding it will also serve homeless families from National City. There is absolutely no need to "import" problems from other neighborhoods. This shelter is proposing to house 433 families per year. This is not permanent housing, only temporary. Families can only stay 60 days. What then? Will they move across to the adjacent Eucalyptus Park and start up camps? There is ample evidence each day that homeless people sleep at the park! We don't want o~r neighborhood to turn into a homeless community. We like it just the way it is. 3. On June 23,1993 the City Planning COIr.mission held a public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit (PCC-9239) of this proposed shelter. Despi te the overwhelming opposition by the community, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council to grant the Permi t. The only people that spoke in favor of granting the permit was SBCS! The general consensus was obvious and the Commission went against the wishes of the people! We do not want our property values to further decrease! They are low enough with the lingering recession as it is. 4. Our Chula Vista police officers are overworked and understaffed. They will not be able to handle the increase in crime this shelter wi 11 bring. On any given night you may find only 4 police officers to patrol the second largest city of the county including the Eastlakes community! There are no guaranteed safeguards from violent spouses, boyfriends or girlfriends, and any other problems this shelter will bring. .:J ( - dl..{JLjJ " ,., (' t!' ,\ i ....). " : '- v WE HAVE GOT TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD! ALTHOUGH WE ARE SENSITIVE TO THE PLIGHT OF THE HOMELESS, WE DO NOT WANT THIS SHELTER IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! AS RESIDENTS OF CHULA VISTA WE MUST PROTECT OUR CITIZENS AND FIND THE BEST SOLUTIONS TO OUR PROBLEMS AND UNFORTUNATELY THIS SHELTER IS NOT THE RIGHT SOLUTION! HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLEASE LISTEN. ~-! . ,) j' iL ~~~~~ lh &, <2.- .:1p,fi ^"" .JJ.. g~{/- <<~~ 3~ ADD RES S 135 GUAVA AilE: c.tlvLJ\ \11<;71l ff7?6 /1'-5 &,u/Cv Ave. t!Jtah u:~ ~;<116 ,If-$' ~~~ltMrL~ J S-"3 )!JUWJ..J/LV~. c:Au.vuv~ /57 ~ ~ (,L.t2. zJ~ 1('7;t:::-~ ~VY.d-~ //,;7 _~~~ j:J 3 . <s~k}~ iL4I"f' (~fL"~ 'ddL ~ ~5 .1111Cl1 ra (bB-cA1tAi'Z J- l{i &:/h1U4 ~ ? V~ J 1 J ']111111.4 /11/1 , e. Iud", uJ&!1 ~/(" .J!t-(AlMY~ flAH: P~.g~7/6 163Av?~CbJ C.I/. 9/''1ltl ,13(, GlIO'~# 11",. (' .11. '1/1'/0 Ill, {... f~a "".- - (Lu---e.. C. 1/. ii,? IC> /-,/'fJ;j...adUzl- hnJl-<. (Jj,A~'f)dt. 9/9/0 , J /:;Jt/ ~/..I.A./--rljt-<.4 . @.V P~/d /:26 '~!7< cL~ C(/ q/~/o ! 2. G C. Ul HU ALP (V Cf I "/0 i 0' [" C-u .I:ltl? A r{ C v 9)9/ c/ /D3 Gt.Jr.JA A1f C.JI 9/1fo ~ I - ..)l(>1- N A M E [/11 /I1CtJJN/ j{ <&/ tJ 11 c:; t/)ILLIIlfr7 t: f'"IIZ tOftibL E/'11.I1t;lflI1 4. /I/Z/J;:rft=:ri , " J.t G 1/1)1 A O.s uly'lJ <f- 1:3 ..E-L 0 IN l; p:z .sf ~I-fu LA V, .s7H lJ7'1 / Cj/910 . - rj;[};2 0 {)s LA IV /f -::OIL V 'ti OS"" e- Ke,.) ... ~''IM.~N 7~"--\)f(.) .J11.J..v<l- M,"'..",a4 M';'",v ~,)"i:>.:J \-\f\T~co. ') I :;2 I -,9. <o~ ADD RES S 10' 6'tJ,4Y/I A-#' c..;/ 'i 1)/<> . 116 ald,J/f /4lfF eV 91'7//j 11':,- G'v/lt/d r)t/", CIl C;/C(/Q 1.~ 'i <i-/:? ,c,,,,coer 5. . t'lV 919/[ 7'/~ p.LoW CA!. ~-C/7L<..LA V/94' (....!/~ FI()w~'^ sT. C U. -4llFJcfWer ~\ CV, '/-It? ~d- Afi. ev 4314 fY\~e\~\\f\ :5\, J c. \J, I l-\ ')L\ \'f\ IH' \L\\ f>, ~... ) c. . '\J, I '-ftf3 t1 f\R \~~ :::s:- '-f.<f3. K f\\Rl""-,,V\ S\ rq ~g- ~1 ~ -of!e- '131;- 'y;ld/U.~ 0. IlL/- ~ ~ UL&L-Z~ /~6 ~ ttvt') {!. V ~ ) '0 ~ ~~ \+ fm::\'1 cOrJ~J I N KE6~\:>S jO ---r:\-\'E '$ ~Kr IER f'Y) ~0S l~(;, ~O~. ::::L A('{\. A f{zf:JpER-"TJ ()\J iJer<.. I N c.J.h> U\ VI ~T1t A-Nb ~L ,q. LoT ~.:F -rPdB H-vwE f6EEJJ pl+l'b 'TO ~L.cJW \j t> --n\-E Ai<EA; m~\wG. -rItE- M.E:A milcH ffi..0R...E"" A'-nJUI.cT\VE..'""1"O u()~ (DERS VI S(TOJ 6, ANt) \ u:;~'-'~ /l\€llII3e1L" r:'l ~~~ V!1.CVlulD \D \ de fl'<EA. cUtLbttJ(, . (t t!,.o~ l,,:)c;, fl2.:tJ~ \N \ LL A--rrR.1"rCr fI1v<..l+ fY1..Df<.1C r\"\iJ" ~,;)\'l\LC~\...-~\ ' . , Y'l-Nl:r GAN<C Aert 111"1 ,~~\~ ~ 6R..ATFIT"'r\ . 1:= ~~=f\;:-R A5~~H:~ cw LA- v\ ~I'f\ . ~\L-'1~U ~~~ 0!2 ~ -4-4 -<-< ::0 nO J: f'I'1 .-n mC") 0 5i!:I: - ITI ,c: N V"),- < 01> ~ ITI -n.ooC-: -Tl--:-: 0 0 __VJ j,,;. o~ !'"'np CD ,;.t \ 'd lR~ , ... , " ~ no 0:: =t= --,.... rn ~ C"-,-) C' I!. "1 r - VI ;T C C..> ~ 00 July 3, 1993 TO THE MAYOR OF CHULA VISTA, JIM NADER AND THE CITY COUNCIL RECEIVED NEIGHBORHOOD PETITION TO STOP THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FROM ALLOWING A "SHORT TERM HOMELESS HOUSING FACILITY" AT 31 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VIetr!OF CHUli'., VISL: CITY CLERK'S OFFICL '93 J1. 13 A9 :05 We, the ci ti zens and neighbors of North Chula Vista are vehemently opposed to allowing a homeless shelter to be instituted at 31 Fourth Ave., by the South Bay Community Services (SBCS) for the following reasons: 1. It is outrageously expensive. The cost for running this "home" each year is $20,140 per bed or $1,007,000. (City Council meeting of 3/23/93 notes, page 5.) There is alternate potential and less expensive sites for this housing such as existing apartment complexes; small motels; or bank owned properties. There is absolutely no reason for the SBCS to purchase this property for an estimated $720,000 and run it for $20,140 per bed! 2. National City is contributing for this homeless shelter with the understanding it will also serve homeless families from National City. There is absolutely no need to "import" problems from other neighborhoods. This shelter is proposing to house 433 families per year. This is not permanent housing, only temporary. Families can only stay 60 days. What then? Will they move across to the adjacent Eucalyptus Park and start up camps? There is ample evidence each day that homeless people sleep at the park! We don't want our neighborhood to turn into a homeless community. We like :it just: the way it is. 3. On June 23, 1993 the City Planning Commission held a public hearing for the Conditional Use Permit (PCC-93-39) of this proposed shel ter. Despi te the overwhelming opposition by the community, the Commission voted to recommend to the City Council to grant the Permit. The only people that spoke in favor of granting the permit was SBCS! The general consensus was obvious and the Commission went against the wishes of the people! We do not want our property values to further decrease! They are low enough with the lingering recession as it is. 4. Our Chula Vista police officers are overworked and understaffed. They will not be able to handle the increase in cr ime this shel ter wi 11 bring. On any given night you may find only 4 police officers to patrol the second largest city of the county including the Eastlakes community! There are no guaranteed safeguards from violent spouses, boyfriends or girlfriends, and any other problems this shelter will bring. )- \ - ) loq , > "1 ''":' .u. ~-~:' "'! ~' ..." . ~d WE HAVE GOT TO MAKE OUR VOICES HEARD! ALTHOUGH WE ARE SENSITIVE TO THE PLIGHT OF THE HOMELESS, WE DO NOT WANT THIS SHELTER IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! AS RESIDENTS OF CHULA VISTA WE MUST PROTECT OUR CITI ZENS AND FIND THE BEST SOLUTIONS TO OUR PROBLEMS AND UNFORTUNATELY THIS SHELTER IS NOT THE RIGHT SOLUTION! HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLEASE LISTEN. N A M E /, , 1_'1 .-,'-,..., I 'ti~ -'- L,- ' Aukl I_,A- ~- ,~.,-' / ~~ /. / ---.. ~<~ ~/"[, ,. /'f.cr;;"'__._-- 7 " I . C~k/H9 J:::e. (f! C'Y,-d../ L ~/ ~ eEl , { 'L~/\ . >;;;;:4 .. C/~~~ n \~- ADD RES S /:;..,', {'J"9l''1 jL,-~ Cl' /,) f C,;,/r:! ,/-1 /,/1//'; C' j/ .;:Jp g., /1// k' ""7/1/ II (!, V ,J" 6,1... AI ( x Cl N, PI a (/ #L( Cj iflJvn/ De/l}ldy (J, [/ /7'? J..l.J. xH CD v ~YS~/lt5~. / .~-j) PL/ j"i;.f, _ 'L j/~ 0/0/ ,;)l/;;70 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit. The application, submitted by SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES, requests permission to establish a short term transitional housing project for homeless families for up to 43 individuals and one resident manager to be located at 31 Fourth Avenue (APN 566-010-10) in the R-3 Zone. A plot plan and legal description are on file in the office of the Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 13, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 23, 1993 CASE No. PCC-93-39 ~( -.).r:::L- NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Consider increase in sewer & storm drain fees: sewer rate increase to finance CV's share of SD Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro) upgrade for water reclamation. Single family residential sewer rate anticipated to increase from $0.00 to $2.23/mo. Multiple family, mobilehomes, low income & commercial/residential to be raised by 70% of single rate. Storm drain fees will not be increased. Consider application for conditional use permit submitted by South Bay Community Services to establish short term transitional housing project for homeless families up to 43 individuals @ 31 Fourth Avenue. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 13, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 30, 1993 Beverly A. Authelet City Clerk c1l - OJ-:r3 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit. The application, submitted by SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES, requests permission to establish a short term transitional housing project for homeless families for up to 43 individuals and one resident manager to be located at 31 Fourth Avenue (APN 566-010-10) in the R-3 Zone. A plot plan and legal description are on file in the office of the Planning Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 13, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: June 23, 1 993 CASE No. PCC-93-39 COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). requests individuals who may need special accommodation to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service to contact the City Clerk at (619) 691-5041 for specific information on existing resources or programs that may be available for such accommodation. Please call at least fony-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days in advance for scheduled services and activities. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. ,~ \ -).--=r4 d- 'ffJll..cL'.J- /* af[u./~,f ?/~/;<~ ----I"""-~..--........."WI!f I, L...... I r----------- ---I , , I I I , , I -i I I "--r-.'" " I tl I I I' I I ,t I I % ... It: o Z STREET , B E .~.~):~!>..::':;i. .';'d ,',. " . . , .. , . ...~ -. . .. . #. . . . " . , ,r"~ .... -' '~.."J . . .I eO . ~ ,. ,0 " I' .... '..~..'.:...EUCALTYPTUS P"'RK ' ;;"q;;{'/';;{ ..' ::' ,J,(.~.,.. .I ',: ,,: ,,/,.', J ", :. ., ~ .', ~ .;' ,'; ",;,.. 1 '-l ~ , C ... II) > ... ... z i STREET . . ! I I.. , TA -j- :II CD . t- .}-- r i %0 a: :;) o "" L ... , . - - 1 o II: i ... % ... a: o z PROJECf LOCATION z ... ct i '- '-, r u t , ~ f cr: w '> ...j .., tl ._.J. r . t-- .. ---1 CIIULA VISTA PL.-\\'!\'ING DEPARTMENT (2) APPLICANT, SOUTIIIIA \ co'ml':\I"I"\ PROJECT DESCRIPTION SERVICES ShOl'l term housing (up to 60 days) for homeless ADDRESS JI FOlIHII ,\\'E.'n: families fol' up to 50 people (Public/QulIsi use. SCALE . FILE NUMBER Hrquil'rs City Council appro\'lIl) ... NORTH I" = 400' PCC -93 - 39 ;Ll- ~-::r5 Kathryn Lembo Executive Director South Bay Community Services 315 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mary Nicolas 17 Fourth Ave., #A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Pam Smith 380 Third Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Len Walton 3123 Casa Bonita Drive Bonita, CA 91902 Ruth Piazzoni 135 Fourth Ave. #5 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Rick Alcorta 47 Fourth Ave., #L Chula Vista, CA 91910 Emerald Randolph 2856 Echo Valley Rd. Jamul, CA Steven Norton 129 Guava Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Tammy Franklin 174 Tremont Chula Vista, CA 91911 George Trevino 512 Casselman Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dan Marcus 315 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Anne Wilson 450 B Street, Ste 1010 San Diego, CA 92014 Violeta Ochoa 207 Sandstone St. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Brad Wilson 626 Arthur Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Cheryl Cox 647 Windsor Circle Chula Vista, CA 91910 Carmen Martinez 1225 Broadway Chula Vista, CA 91911 Paul Robinson 600 W. Broadway San Diego, CA 92010 Allen L. King 601 Myra Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Robert Frazer 321 "D" St. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Terry W. Keith 67 Fourth Ave. #H Chula Vista, CA 91910 Marcella Gomez 135 Guava Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Barbara Phillips Chula Vista Mobilehome Court 8 Via Nomentana Chula Vista, CA 91910 Martino Mazon 31 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Randy Pogue 115 Landis Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dan Dennison 659 Jefferson Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Michael Ochoa 207 Sandstone Chula Vista, CA 91910 Lydia Mojean 329 Topaz Ct. Chula Vista, CA 901911 Jonathan Barber 778 Elder Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Mario Herrera 436 Colorado St., Apt. C Chula Vista, CA 91910 d- I -;). t-LP Paul Perez 307 Orange Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Hector Morales 4335 Hilltop Dr., Apt. I Chula Vista, CA 91911 Anthony A. Ramirez 2035 Oceanview Blvd. San Diego, CA Keith Diffenderffer 321 C St. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Laurie Schmidt 1148 Third Ave., Sp. 115 Chula Vista, CA 91911 Martha Limon 485 Emerson St. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Teresa Limon 485 Emerson St. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Maple Henyan 1260 Second Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Pauline H. Channell 1458 Max Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Annie H. Matheny 1261 Second Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Norman Knight 1773 Broadway Chula Vista, CA 91911 Oshyrsol Salazar 1459 Sequena St. San Ysidro, CA John Iciak 1193 Third Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Frances R. Finnerty 139 Fourth Ave., #7 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Sandrina L. Tarasuck 149 Fourth Ave., #16 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Pat Lynn 149 Fourth Ave., #18 Chula Vista, CA 91910 J. C.lEmestine Presson 145 Fourth Ave., #11 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Nadion Rice 149 Fourth Ave., #21 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Berenice Davis 149 Fourth Ave., #15 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Vivian Savonence 149 Fourth Ave., #22 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Evelyn Miller 139 Fourth Ave., #8 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Penelope Lhrous 139 Fourth Ave., #3 Chula Vista, CA 91910 John/Cynthia McBride 143 Fourth Ave., #25 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Robert/Frances Prozon 304 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Roy/Atsuko Chumbley 89 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Loyd/Celia Moody 83 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Catalina A. V osella 59 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Doug/Helen Sloan 62 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Penny Bushnell 70 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Sara N. Russell 92 Glover Ct. Chula Vista, CA 91910 _:n - (1-" 1- Janet Jenks 232 S. Mt. View Drive Chula Vista, CA 91910 Sylvia Amesta 330 "D" St. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Michael McColeman 345 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mr. & Mrs. H. L. Montgomery 345 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dr. Joseph/Laura Fields 344 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Carolyn Finn 336 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Juanita Lopez 332 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Charles Sawyer 328 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Marian Norton 321 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Esther V. Young 315 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mary E. Powell 318 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Eleanor H. Akem 75 Third Ave., Unit 32 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Loretta Broemling 335 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Ronald/Patricia Hillsberg 312 Kimball Terrace Chula Vista, CA 91910 Marvel Lankford 384 Minot Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Geraldine Treped 328 First Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Lee Tainsh 141 E. Oleander, Apt. D Chula Vista, CA 91911 Claire Hurley 340 "D" Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 John Harbison 329 "D" Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 Stephen J. Cameron 311 "D" Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 Marvin Lindahl 75 Ave., #9 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Harland/Esther Van Ness 75 Third Ave., #16 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dorothy M. Wilson 75 Third Ave., #20 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Emily Myers 75 Third Ave., #10 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Eugene Posey 75 Third Ave., #17 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Resident 25 Third Ave., #12 Chula Vista, CA 91910 June Weller 75 Third Ave., #21 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Isuseyuki Kawnsaki 75 Third Ave., #25 Chula Vista, CA 91910 Sam Kenja 652 Sea Vale St., #B6 Chula Vista, CA 91910 L. Drewith 350 Third Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 2\ -078 Pam Clamser 424 Oaklawn Chula Vista, CA 91910 M. A. Fox 225 Palomar Chula Vista, CA 91911 Robert Campo 1548 Melrose Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Maria Martinez 333 Broadway Chula Vista, CA 91910 Jannette S. Hartman 333 Broadway Chula Vista, CA 91910 Resident 584 Madison Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Helen M. Poke 317 "D" Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 Irene Hazard 800 Vista Way Chula Vista, CA 91911 Letha Slinkers 374 "G" Street Chula Vista, CA 91910 Wilma Kersey 1925 Otay Lakes Rd., #89 Chula Vista, CA 91913 Patricia Meyer Dellarmo 285 Moss St., #66 Chula Vista, CA 91911 Mary Bishop 60 E. Whitney Chula Vista, CA 91910 June Brines 385 Palomar Dr. Chula Vista, CA 91911 Barbara Morris 770 Mission Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Rose Mary Young 719 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Alice Maroun 272-F Del Mar Chula Vista, CA 91910 Janette Chandler 179 Whitney St. Chula Vista, Ca 91910 Anne Wheeler 615 Brightwood Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dorothy Ramm 640 Floyd Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Naomi Overstreet 151 Fourth Ave., #A Chula Vista, CA 91910 Madeline Richardson 151 Fourth Ave., #B Chula Vista, CA 91910 Renee Fleming 158A Glover Sve. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mildred Plummer 162A Glover Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 M/M Show 162B Glover Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Mary C. O'Donnell 161-D Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 c2 (-::;nq . . . , . " I') e , ") , , , . . . C C ~ . ,~ N 0 U ~ > , ,- .... ~ I ~ v , . , < C ~ ~ , cU , . ~ I . , V- W . ~ 0 ~ ~ . h. . ~ C ,. ~ Zv 0 C 0 0 0 <::0 <:: C <:: ~ <:: w, ~ ~ ~ , - C - C . - . ~ ~. 0 ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ C ....wO W ~ C ~ , ~ , , - - - C -- _'V < - . C , C ". > 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ ~- ....C~ U ~ , ~ ~ ....0 ~ - -- '~V , ~ V ~ . 0 _0 I C .... C W C ~C ~OO O<~ I. C C . ~. ov - ~> ~ " -V" ~ . ~ -0> -x ~ " . ~ " j -v ~ .... p I_ ....C ~ ~CC C~ 0 W wu O. .> . C ~.. _"C --. 00 ,U .00 . ~ . " j4 ,- 0 o <:0:: WI- 0 - Ca:WI- 0:1:;1-1- O~_ o_~ oC w_ 04W.... ou .- 00> " H , " ~.!:1:.I'l :>-:t"'r1 .;lo~""J'j :>......,4; >-...~ :> 'Q 1(:.0 '" >"..,.., ,. .' , j. N' =u o......c:t_ oZIO>_ ",<.:u-_ .0,,__ '"">wu N_"'~ c;7":l<UC_ ~ c_ ~~ _Cw " ,~ . :I-'1;~ - ~. - .. ~-. ","'rUol H_ . O. . 0 .. 0" OC ~C OCX O~_ OC OC. O...J<""><O( 0 U_ O~::ll::I: 0.00 O' w 0 U - .r__<t -l..u~<l -ol..u.:JI<:C ....~I:<C ~ - c_ , c "-. ...:>.>::4 -" ^' ..- .....u..lJ......... ........4"..1 N~ .... N~ .... N~ .... "'....1"'- O~. OC ,.... OO""..J 0.... .... Ow~ O' OZ 0" , n.;J,"'-> l'\:" 0::'1 1'\:>"'::'1 n.Jnz OJl:..,Z ", , 0" , OJ " OZ_ .ow-~O .4:_.rr .o..,or ";:l<<'lr .oCI"'II .oWI"-O ,ol.loNC .oeo::......:I: .0.......'1: 0- OX 0-. (\..:1.=..,:0 n~QJ .t'\..u.....I n,....r..J n-r.r-, .rI:Q"O n."o.t> "'..:1-'''-' ",:.:...J (\\::....,.) ..,,.,- ~ 0 0 X . - Z ~ . .... w ~ ~ Z j . , - . .~ C C ~ :; . V V V ~ , 0 C :; .... <- C '; . , -~ ~ . .... w .... ~- .... .... V , " , , , , , .- . , . - C ~ . . ~ . ~ . ~ O~ . - < ~ U , , - > ~ > , > . > ." 0 . ~- > ~ 0 ~ , ~ ~ ~ U ~ -> ~ W -- < ~ W - , > . - . , " , , > ., " . .. . . , ~ N . :; .... - CC N CN W N <N ,- " , , . -", . . . j > ., j " n " , ~x ~ U O~~ ~ wU ~ U ZWU . 2 ~ ~ - 2 > , ~ ~ 0< , , , , ,. .!;<t><l: ... , -, ,.- , , , . U ~ .. w~ . <. ....wC ..C ~O"'U '=:07- U 7U OM ....~. C 'CO >>,,>1_ ::J..J_<<t - .;)...1.....- "- ," , o'V 0_ " 0 :;1:)4- ,- OUct~ o I...",,:: 0 ....U O~ C~ C4a:...... 01;.<\11 o....r..ow 0 ~. 0> '0 0 .. :::>...>...... 0 " -, 7 n< ~..J .- .....=.-.... 0 .- -,- , ...J:.1;..J 0" ., ..,t;cl:....> .' o Z .....J~w .......)-><> NO<Cl 0_ 0 ....:=l.....;oo ...:1:4> N4Z><- - ~ 4"O::.:t'Uw 0' ~ ~ <> 0' :1..11..... ," , :>>'J/I ,. , " 0_' :I..J..u::Jn :>.-:(4; , 0 .=>-..J:.:t ,~" 'v 'w 0 ..r~<(.o::4 .. w -. :.:0< "'00"': ....'_'-=4 N:r>~a: ~O - ....I-ICQ _0 - ........V\<l -X .Z" .v_ " ""_.1'1 Ii;: 0" j ~ j v~ j ~-, " ::l~"''''' ::>~,Q"" .::l:!:....... ,. , 0- ,r.%orz \l"='....l:::l~ .,.,V\1'l ~~ ~O ....uor:;l .....-lor:;, .l"I::lll':::l:> ..o_NZ ..0 <lNOZ .{;_NZ ..oa'::!"':':> O~ il4,...."" "~~ " >).....r4 0_ -X .J...:t.,J: .J<l....I: "" ..;.1.J-U:l .:>..>.:1....4 O..JC.;.l <.J::J:::>J: OJ ....::......"" ....'ltI(:r:l..U .l"I~.r....l ,r.u..Il:......'..J ./'I:F;""U .I'I,:}-OU .1'1""...0..1 .I'I~""<1, ...:0...."" .I'I~..'.,~ .1'11-.....0...> OZ> I ~ > " . ~ c: w C ~ . ~ ~ w . < . < W C - ~ 0 ~ ^ " AO ~ < C A 0 J 0 ~ 0 -~ ~ 0 " 0 0 0 0 V - . - , . . " C < A~ Y ~ . ~ >0 . ~ ~> , ~ ~ ~ ~ > a ~. . c , . " , c Z " , < ~ V - . -. .... , , , >~~ 2 , Z T.... ~ ~ , we ~ , J j ,- , T , 0 , " u. " ,- .- , C ~. O~ 0 ~ 0 _.~ ~~C < ';<<ICT- ~~. ~ ..:..I..lJ , j ,. ,"j 2 > .., " , J J , 2 _w ->< . . ~ W ~ ~< ;O<l 'w ~< ~4t .!:.J4 >uj H' ..J .~:J- 0'- .J.-4 ~ , r<j "' -, OUJ...JI- OZ<(I- OCU Ow - Ow~ O=:JZ:T' O'U-I- 0 w_ O~O O<l<<ll- o~- ,. ~ ::>..:..1:..1'1 '0 0 :::>...J<l.,,, ::l>i:""= 0," 0 "" O. H ::I.lJ...::> :::>.J:>.I'l OV< ",.....Z_ ~o .; ~ ~o ..0_>_ OW U . .< 'JJ:W::-_ H ~- "I-::::':::::l .....:.l..J _ ~>~ .....J:;,:> - ",;;t.~..:..I .=1..:..14... -'< ....I-..J.:> ....J.I>i:> U > (\/lJ.I'" .r.;)..:.(> " > 0<' O>w 0...,0- 00 0 OC 0_ O~~ 0 0 0 .0 o~w 0.< , H .r.....,..:.( '" , ...>i:~<[ ...."';;;,- ....:l....J ....::J&:<l: -" << ,. Z ... ~ ,., t C" ....~I-....l -" .... _00 ~~ J Nw ",-..o=:. NZ ~ ow -~ Q.i.JC\l:.:J Ow " O'~ 0< 0 (\.J::J-~ "Z:oZ n_:J-;) .I'I>-::>Z "...J.:IC ./'14 ....::. 00 0 .:).J...""l..l .:I.J"':) ,,'""..... ..oO'=:%: .0::;0:1: .0<","<<1 ..o~......r ow 0 ..o....l..r<<l ..or",..1: 00 ~: .0='......'" .::<1....r 0-' ....=:.".... ....,,"'.., .....I:n.l'l .1'11-"'-' ""::l..1J ......u....-. .I'I-'..r.... "I'l..:..l.""lJ "Z""Y n>....-..l """ . . :; C 0 ~ w ;:; 0 " . 2 N 0 ~ W ." . 0 U W ~ ~ C , " - 0 - 0 0 0 0 A 0 J : - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ - > , " , , > -~ , C < , , . ~ 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~O ~ ~~ ~ ~ < , w~ /1..:..1...... , , , , ~ , "" . > . , ~N ~20 J ~ ~""N :0 w X~ " . ,.....:J- --~ ~ . . 1:....... _d . 2 " . j~ ~. u C~~ _wU U ZC u ~o . U C~ J U ov. z> j~ . . -~ . .~ -~~ ....>U u>. .CC w~ ~~C OU 0 C CJC ~ ~ ~ '"17'._ OH ::.-......:> 0< ",..J.u_ ::>1:1-_ 0'Z OJ...._ ..., u-...J 0 0'< O~ ~ 02 0 O~~ OI:<<IVl O:l"''''' O"'....VI 01-_0 O<>Vl O~_ O~ ~ 0..... :o..u<l_ .,.:l.I:'-' ..........'lI:4 !:1".J,;>- M4....- '....4-- O""E.;,.:l M"""'.... ~O . ..;IVI....- OJ 001-> NOI-W I'1<llC..J 0 4> ......Il-Vl> ....U;II::> "'-4;W 'w > ot'\.z:...J II'I....VI> ._C , ~ 0 -- ~"''''J O. , 0 0 . ~~.J"" ':),,::1 , j" ,. '0" 4"u.._< .. 0 .U 0 ...Z<.:I<<I ...;r:O<<l ............11:. ~ 0 ~ u ~2 0 ...:.:'-'~ ~~~ ...._>~ ~V~ .......,f\"'" ~O j ~~ ~ ~o ~ ~<O ...,....",.-l OC,n.., 0" " O~ ~- :::> tI"l"'~Z ~~~ \t"IO.....::I ItI.N:l 1t"I:lI:!:1":l ..o"',,"Z -oC 0 -o~N ~~8~ OJ_ >);I;"'J: "'.....oC .o~04 .oWO;I; .oo..U4'J: .c~'"'1: .oen. 'O.........I: .0_4'''' 0"_ ",...NU ....+-....."" .....a....._.J "'''''''U II'>4"U II'lCl4"U .nll-NVI .n:r<'"'+u tl">VI"'..J "'Il-I'1U . ~ ~~ Z . 0 z~ ~ .~ ~ -< < o. ~ ,. ""~"-'-c .~ o~ _....I.uC ::;l>W:>~ ):l.c:~/'l ~OO ~ ....I..J> ::;lZ:::J::lI: "j:J..l...<t O~ ~ .:l..J~":J .D_....4" I rlJI...,IO...l ~ ~ , - r > ~ - , > ~ ~ . ~ U . )JJ...... :>....l>'" ; .. -JCl' :> ,"r ,,:.cl-<:: :l.Ll.r..J ':0 :::l ...l..J.nJ: "Zr--u > ~O ~- N ~..J~ .. -.. ~~U >J_ -:>_VlO -ol..l:_..:l , ~~ '.(<l_ ~....uc >~ :'l..JNZ .;l-.....'" ....'>"'"'" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., ., ., . . ~ ~ U . " ~ 0 ~ - ~ ~ 4 _ , '" " < tt.'-....I U .~. 0""..... :>..... ... ~ -- .......J.I"I> O~ ".1.1.;:14; O~ ~ a...,"':) .0=:""''1: '^" 0..) . ~ u . ~ < . u " . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ':::~ ~ >- " , ~ O~ , ~ -. <~ O~ ::....: 1:::;1 ~<( C'-' .....:[: ...l.... o "'~ :J..J 0_ ~ ..Lu -:>2: .0..1"'....<1; J'\,,"~.I"I N ~ , " N , < o ~ - ~ ~ ~ - o ~ ~ - . ~u ~o ~ < :JT...:.... 0............, ~.Ll"'_ o _> oz. N_ . ~""':O..J 1:~~:! \t'lr....... . (t ~ ~ . ~ o u u ~ z ~ ~ > . o ~ ~ N n . u ~ OU , > 0:>-U<"'10 '\l.t":: ..J N;tl_)(~ , ,- "'J:Xa;C ,-~ .o:::l<:O:CZ ..:l.::l:J <l .lIVlJ:"-", u uo ~>O u._ _ N U~ ~- "H ~~u O_Y:': Ou..wo ~ >~ "'>..JW 0....__ N~""C O~ .0"-'3:1% .D.:I....... ll\u...oVl (t \J ~ ~ - > ~ Z < . o . ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ 0- ~ < . o ~ , - -'\1'..)<( OCll:c:t' ..... ::....,,,.., 4"a:ow_ :::..::......> > 00:10 .., 'I....l<l[ O,""OI.:l..J O~ , ,ooCI-N:I: ".I'll'! 0..) , - > - > < Z U .u< ,,~ e...J:>::VI "'l....l..:.J_ o >> on '"'Z-I< ':>>-=-'...J ~~ 0 0':>0.1: ,r,,,,ou z . r " .- <~< o. ~ ':I"":':""" N ~_ ;:)...J>> O~O .....J.I..J<l O"'''...J o~ 0 .0::1'''':1: t'I:Jt.:Jo..J ~ ~. < ~ ~~ ~~~ ~O~ ~.. arm.. ....-'''''<..> o_~ 'L'::IU ~ ~z ~.:.::.- ~- > 'Oc.....:II: \t"l(CN_ '"' '"' Z z ~ 0 ~ - ~ ~ r ~ , '" ~ < ~ ~ <- ....I'...l.ol: O~ ~ ..>.:1"'''' IZlOW- :J:J>> o ~ "'lZ....IC O"<.:I...J 00 , .o...JNJ: ,,/1.0") A ~ " , u _ z ~ ~ -; , " , u u_ OU. ", - Oct.:o:"" .......J.Ll.... ou>> , 0 "'lV..JCI J.Ll..;l..J ~~ 0 .;J<l.or: .('1>-.;:)<"> ~ o ~ ~ ~ '" > ~ " ~ ~" h ~ " '00 0> 0_ H> O~. :JX-<( .o<,;l:llV o 0 00::'::": ^< - 0L.IJ.t'- .t)...J.....z .0..:,...,0 l'I>l'I:D ~ r ~ _ 0 A ~ ~ '" " ~ ~ ~ % . ~ ~- "~. O~ _ ~..J:C'" N ~_ """11:>> OO~ "'C).J4 0""<.:l..J 0< , .,o..J"'Z l'IC)....J ~ ~ , z u u_ ~u. ,,~ O...J"""" ........1.1- - >> "'0 ""J:...J"'I :>:>.....:J...I <~ " ;):1('<0.1: .l'I1::.Du o ~ "; ~ ~ . < " U~ -~. 0> ~ " <A O...J....._ ........J>> O~O "':g..J<l OQ..'..:J...J "~ 0 J;lcl:,....:r l'I.JJ;l.J . . z ~ 0 < - > < - ~ ~ , o . ~ u ~- ~u< 0" ~ OOat..... O',x..oJ_ o >> ~.~ f"'I..J..Je( ::'>..oJ~.l ~~ 0 .ooCt:l'J: "'><t'\U " \) o " ~ ~ o < 0 ~ - '" ~ ~ w '" , ~ . ~ z~ O~< 00 ~ :;...:.::'" "OOw.... ~.::I>> o 0 "';>-..J~ Oat<.:l..J o. ~ ..oWI"'lJ: 1'11-7'....1 , - > - > ~ < , ~ ~ _ < < > ,~ ". . ~< OOw ':>':.0...1 o ~ l'I;>-;J- "'IJJ CI. :>.J'1...I.I ,....::0 .I'> or~ ..o~Q..O .;I:I:;>.,.;J. .r.:...>Z~ o - '" ~ a- o . ~ <- r". Ol-WI- :)"0::'" ...Wl-_ ,,-c.l'>> o ..,... :14 oz ~ .;1..:;....:1 ,Cw.....J: nJ"lJ ~ < . u <- h< ,:1,-,,,,... c,,,,a-"" .:;1"''''_ N.D"'> , ."">-C"'I ,,< ~ ,clltl"'l:::O .o:J"l:l: .r.......,u N , ~ , ~ ~ o ~ o " . > 0- > ~ - ~ < ~ ~. -" ~ ..J4 0-, ..II- ::'>:::1 oCt.l'> a-::JC. :::>- ....<l L:.> OU ^ << oz"" ..I oz.:!' a ';I .owll"1:I: .('1."""''-' N > ,~, ,:11-::'>'" ~ NO IZ..... ~. N :>~I-.:7' -~ ~z . "''''fWU ::I-.-r-" 0", 1-0 .....I-UZ""' .... _....r,IJ ::,>'::':J_ ,",ww c <:':l> :':;I ..ooo~z 'O..J.....;.l<l ltl<.:lU..-1Il ~ ~ O~ ~" w_ ZA . ~z o ~. ~~ ~Z v~ ~ "" '" - _~ a- ", ~- < .~ ~ ~ - ':..jJ.u<l CC{Z:W~ :)L:....,,'" ,0 a~_ "\I:::..J",> 00< "''':''':I-<l: OWW ....J .01:"'....';1 ,0< ....z .nJ.!:......I , - > - > , - > - > ., u Z- ~. :)i!..u- Ou..:.::..... 1'1..1...... "'Will> or ~ "'< ," ~ ,0"1'-::> 0.........1: ltl...I"'lW < . , ~ z~ ~". ouw.... , <^ OlCl-_ ....:;1..... O~ "l"'::I<l O~ ~ .0.........:) ,c40r i'I.:l"..I A " ~ ~ ~ u u , o _ < > ~ - , > ~~ "' ~~u < ~~o ;!:D..J_ O::JC{"" :!'Ll.'l.... "" ;1:> oz_ ........:.-C( '" ~ .c:::OoJ"':l .0":::'>:: row...,...... < . ~ < ~ . ~ 0 , < o '" < o ~ "" ow. z-" ~ "H o ~~ ::'>>-4"'" :':::':::0_ ".uC> 0<_ '1"'''..:( O~ ~ .0...1>1::'> ..0-"" X JlJ:"'..I , Z _ ~ w _ z ~ '" . " u .~ ~~. ::,>.u.,,_ 0<.:lClf.'" ~ -- ""Zlll> o~ .....",,0... ~~ " .,01[:....:::0 .D<""".I: ltluf"'IU , , o < 0- < '" . 0 < ~ z < o ~ 0< -'u,C{ ,-~ ~ <H cu.....Jl- :)':1'1:'" oJc..- ......:z,.. o ..,,,,,,4: 0"-' ...J .0'1..":1 ,00""1: 1'1...1"..1 ~ ~; 0, r. u Oil:: , ~r(l: 'H O~- , ~, 00 .0..1; ou. nz- , ~ o ~ . ~ " ~ . N ~; " , > :J~':: o~, ,~ ~~- ,,, ,....:>1 0-' <z_ "" ~'I:: ~ ^ ~ . . ~ , o " , z, ~ =- ~ "~ O~_ 00' <,. , r OA_ ""1.:1'" O~ 0"' ~-. i'I..."" , > o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ A z ~ ~~ 00 ~< ~o "~ ~ 0'" ~Z> "~, ltl...,.... , .df ~d8'~ - A ~ ~ - > ~ Z '" < - . ~ ~ . '" ~ "^ 0 ~. u "'>~ ....cu.... or. Olll G<.1Il .t'I~"....._ 01:1<0">> , ,~ l"1Il0"..J< Q.......:>.:>J oDSl ::l .0.1.1.0.0.1: ""...JO.....u '"' " ~ 0 - ~ ~ ~ ~ " u . ~ ~- ~. 00 _ =>>-"..... ..-~....- ......J,...,.. o ~ ">-..1<01 O::J'-'.J o=> , .oOI"'l~ l'IrJ:lw , - > - ~ > A . ~ u Z~ <u. 0' o ~~ !f'IJl:.u_ ....w>> 000 f"'IZ..J<C( 0'-1.1':>...1 ~~ ~ .0........:1: ll'Iu...u , -' . > o w ~ 0 < - . ~ Z _ , '" <" ~. z....J w "~. O:::O...JI- ':).1.14'" oJ""~_ " ~> ~~- "..1.:..:( "'~ ~ .oll:.D';I ..00"'::1: l'l"""'.J ^ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ - - < ~ ~ - , ~ u o ~ u ~- ~~. Q-C..._ 00""..... ...,.:JL__ N ~> ,. f"'IWO< " ~ '$~-:;::y ltl......,u , , , ~ > > - , > J.' .~ ....I ^' . .:> "'}~... C~....lV1 "..J..J_ .., :;> ::J!:I: "''' .. :>':)J .c';;':J.,? 0...'..11: .i'I~""W ~ : ~ ""0 <>- ,,~ ~ ~ H A~ <-, 01."''-' "0. '\,1]:.:>:;1 ""I...:><:::;a o o. '1.c~L: O~ ~ 'O..J....:c: .oC{I'-'::' I\C.OU ~ . > , > v 0 > ~ -; o o u ~^ ~,. 0"'''_ OU.....1Il - - ......ex> ,=>, I""IZ~"" ~. " .o~o:::o 0_ r "'x:~u , ;) . , ~ > ~ ~ > ~ , . ~ < - <u :l'C<il.- o ~ -t_c::(_ ,f:L.).:> ~,t~ r<'I:f:<l ," " ~%:::>~ 0--'::: .:-.><..ow ~ ~ ~ ~ J' ~. <- , ~ ""' CZ...J~ O~""/1 o '.l.J x,_ -I"J:l'i:> o _ 'l.!:'::'" 0< ~ .03.1'1::;) "'-....:x: ('1...."'-' ~ ~ , o ~ 4 > . ~ ~ > ,~ .~. ~U ~ <~< ,:)C ,..... 00"';"" :1'~J:I- .....I-~> , - ....Zlt'll ,. ~ .o~...::> .o_"~ Il'\""......., . . i . " J_ 7_ ," ~Z .. ~ ^ " u.;V'I ... ~- > vu ~ z > ..~ ,~< u..u..I-U " ...J>.:l...J"l( ~-ZJ"" ;;;';,,)::>411'1 .J'\:=I..Jll..... 4....J>1::> , ,- .....~1l-lt'" " " ,c::>C......::> .;l.:l...J.....I: r>~,..,u ~ ~ . , w. Z-~ < -"< O:':...JI- .:144..1'> ,,11::1)_ . .. OZ_ "1:;1,,<1( O~ ~ .::L"-i~ .cON:I: t'lZ'"IW ~ i , ~ ~ > o ~ i > O~ ~~. <~U ~ ,~. 0_ ,... O....""'Vl .....Z:t:l- "......11::> .")'" - ~ i. ~, J .01-"'::> .DC,..,..!: "".........U . . . " , , , "N .~~ ~~O ,-" Z>. . ,. .CJ O~U .:/-!::;I ...w4...1 .nll:":.J 0' ""lCO~ or......: .,)Jl'l: ,cCNC l\.J-IJ , ~ > ~ ~ > ~ i < W ~ . o . ,x o ~ ,:,,............ .r'WV'I> " r",J:c.< .. " ,c1::"":::' .o=.o..rr; Lt'\"'C~u = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u . . , . . J .~ -.< 0...1.....1- '::>...J"'''' 3'_1-_ ":C.l'l~ o ".....:l<l O~ U .;l:).f'l.:l .oU-Tx. .0.1"1.......) . z , ~ " ~ ~ , " 3 . > ~ . ~v ~ w~ , ,~ ~ N V'I ....;,- , ~ i ~. ~ .u o v 00 ...0 ~~ ~ "'w )(w :>- ::;)- 1"'10 ",Q , ,0% 0% D' . "'.....atQ.1I'I . < ~ ~ w , X ~ ~ v o ~~> wu~ J > o~x :. <(..:C 1: 4"'I:<l<U ;;;)'J_ o E< .0"" ;- '-'wo- .,.::: ',jZ .0>-"0 ^"nJ) , , u ^ _w. '=>1->- 0",'01"" ", OUI> , - .('u...,..c:t ~. " ,c-J-::> .:>..,J.;lI: .,r,u....u u w c: . . ~ <;; . ~ . J z~ ""' 00,,-,1- ::)-.,,'" " ~- l\0!;../'I> ,. .,C :l"t 0- U ,;J...J":> .0:::'."\1:1: .I'lL"'..) ~ 7 w, NO -- ~. uO x, o ~ .....4.... O~N iM .- ~.. w u ,.. o 00 "\J"'Z...:l "'0......... :::>..&.J_ ~ 0 ,,, "'.....aoz .0""."'< "'."'V'I , ~ 0 J ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . z . ~'J x," 4;.",,4 QQ.."" , " (7'........- :>.....1'1:'- O~ .0",..4 ~w ~ .oCI'I':> .cc:.~:r roo.l'l."..) , ~ > ~ ~ ~ , , ~ ~ > . ~ , > ~ u , ~ u .w. .:l-...._ OQ."'''''' ""U__ Cu.""> ,~ .c.q.::l4 ~ - " D co .oJ,:)!: "'.e....u " ~.. <<~ ~, " < O<.:l<(~ , i~ .t:Jz:.:.... ~4....:.- 0__ .:l::/I-.t ~~ u .o.:>::l:l .00..::1'::1: .ro4..,..) " > ~ . > z z . . u ~~ Ow. :."V...._ o ~~ "l:~"" OU"'> "' .000< _. J .cOO::l .o;3t:OJ: .....~I""lU ~ ^ o v ~~. J . . ZZ~ OZ, .:> 1'" u ...000 '\I-'~- o -~ .< z .........N< o.u-.JJ .c,x....u ro'.3l'l;:l . ~ ~ ~ , < z -" U'O "u_ 'i~ . - ,., "- ~. ;:...1 .. , . O-'O~ , Z~ ::1'.....-.... ......ull:> OU. ,Q<[..I<( ~N -' .oz"':> .000"1: r>...::J'\I..) ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ > w Z . ~ou i" 'N" '::10..__ o ~ f""~__ ....w.....> ~" "'lll:~C ~~ J ",rll'\::I .o~~J: ....."'I""lU , , . XO .~ E ,. .~~ wo "n ~ ~ ,.> o_~ , -, .....O%U V", O..J::D4 .- ~ "'0:0"_ ,Q1l.'\I~ "'CO'O l'l...l\lJ:l n ~ I o - , , o ~ ~ , ~ < , ~ . , 'N~ 'J^ o....:;r-o<l ,. J .,",4)<' :1...:14 . . ~ ~- .c<.:lc.z O~ ~ .r.>o..:%: ~ , " o ~ ~ , x ~ c: ~ > . .. <J ~ ,-< oa: ~~ ~,:[ ...../1 ,..,.... "'- V <> oz . 0'> ..:let ~~ U D....\I;:I.:> .o:>:r...:r rooI:,......,) N > ~ , ~ " z ~ ~ x o ~ ~ ~ ~ , , .. ~ > ~ ~ . u U i~ .~. o-r .... Ou.......... N ,- N)o-...I> n.< .0...1..... _~ J ",-"'::I "If"" I: "'.....NU J l ) . . . ~ . . . , ~ > ~ , > . , ~ u_. .:J....u- CV'I,"-V'I ~ -- ....c.....> -, ;r;....C< ~J J oD<1l<?::J ..:l;:>"1: ;I"\.><:.....u ^ < ~ ~ v ~ L . u ~>. xU w .-, OO~.... :::'''''''.11 N x_ ~....Jt:> ~~. .o...J..::J~ ~z u .o-tJ"j .0....01: l'\/I~U ~ ~ x ~ ~ J > , ~ . > . w U U~ zW. ,")C( u_ O~O:"'" .......,.,,...- o ~> ,~ IlOWOoC ~~ " .00:0:> .(J~~I. .....r.....u r9{ -(;2 6a . l j j . . . . . l . . . . ><xxxoex x>(>C>(o<>C XXXXKX XX>(><>(X XX)()(XX X)(>(>C.o(X )(XX)()()< >C>(XX>(X l(XxXxX .o(>(>()(.o()( XXXXXX ><><x>(<>( )o<XXXXX ><<><><><>< )(XXXxX XX>c><.P( XXXXX>< ><><>(.0(><< X)(XXXX >(>(>()(>(X )(XX)OO< >(>(>(<>(.0( XXXX)()( >(>(><>(XX XXXXXX ><><<>< >C>< XXXX)(l< >(><>(>(>(>C XXXXXX >C><><...>(>C >(>(>(xxx )<X)(XXX >C.o<><>(>(X Xl<XXXX X>(XX>(>( X><XXXX >(>(>(>(0(>( XXXXXX <>C>(>(>(>( XXXXXX >(><>(>C><>C XXl<X)'O( ><>(>(>(.><.< X)OO(XX >(>C>(>(>(>( XXXXXX .0(<<><><< XXXXXX <<<><<>< ....><XX><X )(>(>C>(>(>( XXXXXX >()(>(>(>(l< XX)(X><X .o(>C>(>(>(< XXX)<XX >c<.<,<>c>( XXXXX><: >(>(>(.<><X >()(XXX>< >(xxxx>< <<-<>(-<.c )(X)(XXX )(><>(>C>C>< X><>(XXX >(X><>C:>C>C X><XXXX <>C-<>C<< XXl<XXX ><<<>C>C< XXX>(><>< ><>C<<>c>< XXXJo<XX >(>C"P(>c>< X)<XXXX -<>C<>(><>( XXXXl<X )( <>C< >(>C XXXXX)( .0(><<>(>(< X)(X)<XX X>(X>C>c:X >0<>0<><>< X)(>(><<>< XXX><><>< <<.<<<>< XXXX>(X "'>Co( <.< >or; X:><XXXX XX><X>C>< ~)(<-<>< J:XXXX .0(>(>( lI:><XXX ,,<<>< -< WXXXX ~>C"C::<>< XXxx J"....>(><>(>< .....::Il:XXXX I ::::P(>(>()( l"1:%:)(X)(X :1',,><><><>( I X)o(XX ,-,..>(>()()( ...,<.:l>(><XX :...Z>(>(><>< _>(X><>< .I"'()(><>< ",,::n()(XX .n~>(>(><X -#:%:XXXX :I X><>(>( O'''XX)(X J>(",<'" _XXxx ..J..J",>(>(o( CClXlXXXX C:;I)()(>(>< ...Ja..XXXX . . . . . . . " o o . o . W , , " ~ < > ~ ~ . > W ,~. 'OU " WU .;;):>.~... OZ.......... :O<lJ_ ...,:a::..J> , r--...:::t:oC( "" " l"1...J~,:) O:;l..,.r:: ll'IoC(nu . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . . . ~Q ^~ " ~ ..~ ~~O "' ~E~ " ~70 ,;):!:::J,I'-' 000 :/'.l..":'Z ~ _0 'oI":)I:-' .....,oC( ooQ -l::l<)"" ~o~ O"'I'IJ .n:r;:........ " 0 ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ -" o~. "" ~ c.ll....~ O..J"'.... .:J..:>..:.... '>:>::1""- .::::l.::::l..J'" N"W o E. ~" -' (1-)':;1 ..:lw....:t: ro"'....'-' " ~ ~ ~ > ~ > " . ~ U .~ ow. ;:,.~..u_ OTQtVl ~ ~- O...JVl> ~~ l"1<.:lc.. ~~ " ~~~~ It'\......-#u . . . . . . . XXXXXX >(><>(>(><>( x>(x><xx >(>(>(>(>(>( xxxxx>< )(>(>(>(>()( )I(X)(X)(X )()()(X'o()( XX'>(XXX >(l(><>(>(>( xxxl'<XX ><)(><><><>< X)(XXX>C: >()(><><x>< xxxxxx >(><><'<x>< xxx><xx ><)(><><><>< xxxxxx >(>(><><><>< XXXXl'<X <<<<<< xx>(xxx l(>(><><l(l( XX)(XXX >(><><<><>< xxxxxx ><>(><>()(>< xxxxx>c: >()(.<.<>(< >(>(><><><< XXXXXl'< ><><><><><>< XXXXXX ><><><><><>< x>c:xxxx >("'><)('<>< XXXXX)( ><>< <'< < < xxxxxx ><<<<>(>( xxxxxx >(<<>(<>< xxxxxx >(<<<<>< xxx>c:xx <<><><><>( xxxxxx -<-<<><<< ......xx><< ><><><><<-< xx>C:xxx ><><><><><>< xx><;xxx ><><<<<< xxxxxx >('<><><><>< ><xxx>C:x <><<<><< xxx><xx XxXX><X <><><<><< x><x><xx ><><.<<><.< xxx><><>< ><xx><><x xxxxxx <><><><><< xxxxxx ><><><><><>< xxxxxx >('<><><<< xxxxxx ><><><><>(>< X"",XX)(X >(><>(><><< XXXX)()( <<><<<>< xx><xxX <<<><<< xxxxxx ><x><><><'< x><x>o(xx ><><><><><< x')(xxx')( ><<<<><< xx><xxx <<<<x< xxxxxX xx><x>(>< ........................ >(xxxxx )(x><><xx xxxxxx <><><><><>< XXXX)()( >(<xx>C:>< xxxx)o(x xx>(><x>< xxxxxx x><x><x>< xX)(XXX ><><XX)(X J<xxxxx ><x><xx>< xxxxxx ><><x>(xX XX)(XxX <><><<x>< xxxxxx )(.c:.c:.c:><>< X X)O< xx)o< xxxxx>< xxXxxx <><)(>C:x>< xxxxx:x >o(xx<><>o( XXX)()(X x>(><x<>< xx')(xxx U Z - W 0 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ . " -~ Z". o_w.... :>>.c..::-" ~ ~- '\I~-"> ~~ '01::::>>'-''' ~~ -' vz....:> ""'w....::t: n~~~ o " Z " . ~ -~~ ~~~ "~, U~ Z _W. >" O~. n 0 ..r-X(.:l 'oI.::::l......u ~o:r:.o- "" 0 ~~Q 'oI;O::jZ .oo~oC( 'c\,JJ"'" ~ "^~ U~N zo ~- ~ zo;o::-r- w...Jc-r- ." . t-:I::::.::..., ~ ~ W>C...J >z...... z_ _ ...z: ~~u O'-'J....c OZWO:r:ll-I ..,_:z:a.,~ ....czz ""'::I::::I~ Nw.....U.. ,.,..:> '" NClCCO..J .00...."'.... ""....UNO U Z . ~ . W C . ,,~ ~ ~~ , u" EO~ ^ ~, W W 0 .J <lZ '" ~o~ ~~ c'" w"'.. .,...... ....".J ........ ,..,.- :> "'.c..... ,...... 1[" OJJ "'-" ~.... ....:::l ".oz .:)"'..::....~<I .l\...~ul"-'" U Z ~ " , N --, ~~o 2:.., .... _~r c:>....~ O"''''Il'IZ -::l_'1.I' ~ < :lzz....'" O"'_VlO _CC4;~ N" W ...J;:I :E .a......ow .n"..J.....z ~ w" ~~ . _0 UZN ::;:1-.......... ~NO ~., . ~ .~~ ~o 7' OZ>O .0-,...::.::; O...JIl'IClC ;:,1....:> ~. ~ ~J~ ~i!.::::l~ It'\u1''-7 , ~ < , N Z ~ ~w ,>< ~ou -'~ . 4;J,J.:( ow>.... :> ::::J-" ll'\u...J_ "'::1.:):- o "'u.4: "'....z.J O. , ..:l....~x: ./'IJ'l"''''' ~ ~~~ -'-'4:> m~~ ,,~~ ~-~ o . OZ . "'i::)oC(U ~~~ .:J..r..",..... ~. Z ,........,..- .............a.. .o:>.oJ It'\u.....c " > w ~ ~ 0 ~ ;; ~ , ~ . "~~ -~ 0" 00 ~ ::I,J':" ~ .- ::;:I....::::l> NOW ,,-.....'" ~" -' n~n:J .aa::.....J: 1'1::1 OJ " ~ u> ~~ H << ~U " r_. ::>>-"'.... ~" ~ ,,"'....- o ~> .....,...? "'00<( ....,,:!:::J or,::!", :'J ':)::II'IJ:: ....t::cu " ~ , . ~ .~ . " , oowu ,>> ~ .0 ,,~ " "'Zu..c ........ = .......J.l'I.:'J I'I,;,.r;o:: 0\4.1"'0 "''''....v o , N . ~ Q W ~ . "~ -'N .-~ ~~N > ~O ". W~U ~>~ O)-~o ,.....'" ..:l ......JlCW ..... _J_ ~Z 0 ....'.J,IO Il'IWl"1Z ~"'''4 "'Cl4-VI " ~ r " ~ ""a 0:>>.... ::I<(~/'l ~~ -::l....~> O~~ -l''''''''''' ~ ~ 1'1....1'1';:1 ..:lWo4"I I'IJr'-J , ~ > ~ -> ~ " <(.7'-' , -'T4 .::::l.u,J- O,J:.W", "J,J",_ O~VI> , . 04"wU4 '" " ll'\-'.l'I::l O_."1.t: .l'III:04"U ~ ~ z . , , " WO .." L."...... , ~W~ "- 0.. "~ " ~~~ ::I......u"::l '" >~ :>"".J.J.J 0....__ ~"..,..:. ~~ n.,;):cZ .001"-4 n..r..o-" Z " ~ . " >0 ~ ~ > , ~ z~~ W~ > a ~ZU ~" ~'O Q "- 0_"'''' .............- ......."'> "". l"1J::u",: ~U " ~::~i! \t'lU-#U o ~ ~ ~ , . u ~ , , ~ 0 ~ ~ N " > "~ ,,':..J4: . U ::>t:'l; CUI2":::l ^ ~, .....Ju..w ':OJ........ 04"... C ;~].;7 ..l",-o.,t .n.......'" ~ ~ ~ w ^ ~ " u ~ y ~ <.l[ ,.. -', " , . .oJ.JJ " ')<It O~...J"" ~;, " 04"'.......z_ ..J~'" o.~ ~,J...( ~~""..J ^" , .c=:aXll: .(\:;1"1'..) .' . Z ~ ~t ~4~ jl~~ ~:::~ ~- or~ lI'..........( . . . " ~ -' . < w > ~ o , ~ o i~ 0'.... ~~ . M\ ~ ",". ....u...I.-.' ....... \ OW' ^, ~ o -' - ~. ....., ,,: ~ e:: ~ 4, , ~ :<( ~~ or. )'; ~U ;)~ ,~ ~" '....~. ~~ ~. '" . , , ,. ^ oz. ,~ ~O ~ O~, '" .....:...J ,.. ~". ~, c0\ -dev .. i j ! . I ,-' June 15, 1993 RECEIVED '93 JIl18 1\8:S0 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY CLERK'S OFFICE Honorable Mayor Tim Nader and Councilmembers City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, Ca 91910 Dear Honorable Mayor Tim Nader and Councilmembers: At the last meeting of the Housing Advisory Committee, the committee members were very pleased to hear that City Council unanimously approved the formation of the Chula Vista Housing Authority. The committee feels that this action is a very important step which will help to increase housing opportunities for Chula Vista residents. In addition, the committee voted to request that City Council negotiate for at least 200 existing rental assistance certificates currently being administered by the San Diego County Housing Authority in order to help accelerate the immediate operation and staffing of the Chula Vista Housing Authority. Joe asillas, Chairman, Housing Advisory Committee JC/JA:ag [AG\A:\HACMAYORLTRI DISK #7 C~(' ~,' 7r--, ' ~,-) (0 ~Y1 ~.#Y. ~c;;~r jPJ eJ,). - / I f:.',',r:" r,'~ ,7";: 7;"=~-,'-, ..~ J ;~ ~ . i~:' :.) :1 \':'1 1;:' , , 1,'0:' T"-- _1=__}. ,~~.., -: ,I /'! _ ":1 I 6 1993 f' J c..j. _....__...,~",..""'~,_\ /CI'" -L. Cc\Urc;.\ \'.-. , . ,', ~.. -J ~; V'; 8/' Br llt Ell , IIO " )TlO ~ -, .. ,. ~ ., ~ fi ~ ~ :+ COUNCIL AGENOA STATEMENT TITLE: fl. Item cl3 Meeting Oate 7/13/93 REPORT Update on the Solid Waste Participation Agreement and Alternative Disposal Options RESOLUTION 17/~~pprOVing Agreement (As Amended) By, Between and Among the County of San Diego and the Cities of the County Establishing an Interim Solid Waste Commission and Providing for the Disposal of Sol id Waste, and Committing 50% of the City's Wastestream to the County [J. SUBMITTED BY: City Managef (4/5ths Vote: Yes___ No~) Council Referral No. 2781 At the 6/22/93 meeting, the City Council held a lengthy discussion dn the proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement, eventually taking action to offer to participate on the Interim Commission but not to commit any waste flow at this time until specific issues have been addressed. Council identified six specific issues of concern to be addressed and approved a seventh concern to be negotiated as a provision in the proposed Agreement. The deadl ine for action on that Agreement was 6/22/93. At the first meeting of the newly formed Interim Commission on 6/30/93, the Commission voted unanimously to recommend an amendment to the Interim Agreement. The amendment extends an opportunity to non-member cities which did not sign the Agreement, or which signed the Agreement with conditions precluding membership, to join the Interim Commission by signing on or before 7/23/93. 5 ince Counc i 1 act ion on 6/22/93 did "not adopt the reso 1 ut ion approv i ng the Agreement, both the Interim Agreement and the amendment extending the deadline (Attachments 1 and->l'2) are being brought back at this time for Council recons i derat i on. The report a 1 so i nc 1 udes any updated i nformat i on regard i ng alternative disposal options, primarily additional information received at a workshop held on 7/1/93 by the North County Solid Waste Management Agency. RECOMMENOATION: Accept the report, hold relevant discussion and continue the item to the Council meeting of 7/20/93. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: DISCUSSION: Not applicable. Status of the Participation Aqreements and the Interim Commission As Council may be aware, the Interim Commission's initial members consisted of the County and the Cities of Lemon Grove, National City and La Mesa. At the Commission's first meeting on 6/30/93, additional member agencies were seated: the Cities of Coronado, San Marcos, Poway and Solana Beach. There was significant discussion among Commission members and other cities regarding specific concerns and issues registered by the cities during the Agreement review process. ,J.J/I- / .... . ~.J I~ , .- ,,", .::0 Page 2, Item Meeting Date .j73 7/13/93 Chula Vista's specific concerns were presented at the Commission meeting by Mayor Nader, and Councilmember Moore and City staff were also in attendance. At the conclusion of the meeting, there was a unanimous vote of the Commission that all of the cities' concerns/conditions (Attachment 3) will be placed on the Commission's next agenda to be addressed. The Commission also approved a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors and their respective City Councils that would extend the deadline for signing the Agreement to 7/23/93. All Commission members expressed their interest in being joined at the next meeting on 7/28/93 by any or all remaining cities. The decision point for membership was clearly articulated as being a willingness to approve the existing Agreement (as modified only by the extension of the deadline) and committing at least 50% of a city's waste flow. Cities were assured by a mot ion of the Commi ss ion that a 11 expressed concerns/cond it ions wi 11 be addressed by the Commission, however, a city must be willing to make an unconditional commitment in order to be invited to the table. It is noted that some cities made unconditional commitments of their intent to come to the table, but also emphasized their concerns by adopting resolutions expressing the "understanding" that certain key decisions would not be made by the Board of Supervisors without a majority opinion of the Interim Commission. North County Workshop on Alternative Disposal Procurement Council was informed at the 6/22/93 meeting that the North County Solid Waste Management Agency (the "J.P.A." Cities of Carlsbad, Escondido and Oceanside) scheduled a workshop on 7/1/93 to which all cities were especially invited. The purpose of the workshop was a presentation by the consultant (Harvey Gershman of GBB) hired by the Agency to carry out an RFP process for procurement of alternative waste disposal options. Council had expressed an interest in the information from this workshop since an important agenda i tern was the consu 1 tant' s status report on the research regarding alternatives to the County system. City staff was present at the workshop. Attached to an Information Report dated 7/6/93, Council received a copy of the outline of the consultant's presentation along with a supplemental page of notes (prepared by City staff), taken from the discussion or public testimony. Although more detailed staff notes were included with the Information Report, this report wi 11 again reference and highl ight those parts of the workshop critically important to the Council's decision. Regarding information on the alternatives, most new data was on the Orange County RFP schedule and an update on the Campo situation provided by a representative of Mid-American Waste, the landfill owner-operator. Both opportunities, as destinations, might be available by 1/1/94 although the process for reaching the destinations still has the same hurdles previously described: award of the Orange County RFP to the low bidder(s); repeal of Orange County's ordinance prohibiting the import of waste; and transfer station capabilities needed for any ~J/?~.2, Page 3, Item Meeting Date .:13 7/13/93 destination outside the County system. There was no substantively new cost data on disposal options uncovered by GBB, although the upcoming procurement process will bring out more definitive information. However, the workshop was extremely helpful in giving valuable background information to cities which had not previously actively pursued options. For example, the consultant stressed that the Agency (or the City) did not currently have either facilities or administrative infrastructure in place to support its own waste disposal system. Because of the start-up time and expense, it is worthwhile making sure that the Agency has carefully examined all other possible options or strategies for changing the existing infrastructure before venturing outside. Additionally, critical concerns to be addressed when embarking on such a course include: 1) Ensure adequate planning (time, reliable information, etc.) for both interim and long-term options. 2) It is necessary to plan for a system, rather than just looking for a landfill to place waste. 3) A key factor in correctly prlclng, sizing and optimizing resources is understanding the amount and expected duration of the current and projected waste flow from the Agency members or any prospective new members. Finally, in response to the Agency's discussion about encouraging the County/Commission to respond to the RFP, the consultant indicated that, if the County were inclined to respond, they could possibly be the lowest cost alternative, aiven everythina else that has to happen to make other alternatives operational. The meeting concluded with the Agency's decision of continuing to pursue a relationship with the new Interim Commission simultaneously with sending out the RFP for procurement of an alternative (short-term and long-term) system. Specifically, the Agency will propose language amendments to the Participation Agreement and distribute the proposed language for support among the currently non-signatory cities. The amended language will basically represent the conditions previously imposed by Carlsbad and Escondido. The specific proposal should be received by the City around 7/15/93. It is felt by the Agency that non-signatory cities represent a significant amount of tonnage, i.e. around 446,000 tons at the 50% level, which could be used as leverage with the Interim Commission. The proposed Agreement wi 11 be presented at the next Commission meeting on 7/28/93. .J.JA'J Page 4, Item Meeting Date /j 7/13/93 Tip Fees and Surcharqes Council was informed by an Information Report dated 6/30/93 that the Board of Supervisors took action on 6/29/93 to amend the County Resolution setting fees at the landfills. At this time, the tip fee was set at $43 per ton effective 7/1/93. A surcharge was approved to be effective 8/1/93 for all non-signatory cities, bringing the total tip fee to $62 per ton for those cities. The Board also indicated that future amendments to the Tip Fee Resolution will rely on advice from the Interim Commission. As previously noted regarding the actions of the Interim Commission, the extens i on of the dead 1 i ne for sign i ng the Agreement (7/23/93) and the next Commission meeting (7/28/93) have been specifically set to allow non-signatory cities to reconsider their actions prior to the implementation of the surcharge. It is also noted, and reported to Council in the Information Report, that Chula Vista's City Attorney has voiced the same concerns about the legality of the surcharge as have been expressed by Dwight Worden, Special Counsel to the City of Carlsbad. FISCAL IMPACT: As previously reported, the fiscal impact of this decision will fall directly on the rate payer. The following illustration of the fiscal impact to the rate payer is based only on the current tip fees (effective 7/1/93) and the surcharge (effective 8/1/93). It does not represent the impact of any increase that may be recommended by the Interim Commission in the near future as a result of an inability or lack of desire to issue bonds. CURRENT FEES SIGNATORY CITY NON-SIGNATORY CITY $43 TIP FEE $43 TI P FEE $62 TI P FEE $14.26/MO. (EST.)* $14.26/MO. (EST.) $16.77/MO. (EST.) *Estimates based only on projected increase in landfill component and do not reflect increases for hauler's operational costs, new programs, etc. It is also noted that. as of 7/1/93. the hauler's rates have not vet been increased to reflect the tip fee increase from $28/ton to $43/ton. :Until those rates are ad iusted. the actua 1 rate charqed to a homeowner is $12.28/mo. 023/1.. 'f Attachment 1 APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 1 AGREEMENT BY, BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITIES OF THE COUNTY ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM SOLID WASTE COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE ("INTERIM AGREEMENT") This Agreement ("INTERIM AGREEMENT"), is entered into by, between.and among the County of San Diego ("COUNTY") and i$~1f1iifh cities within the COUNTY, for the purpose of providing a commItted flow of solid waste that serves as a basis for the COUNTY to issue bonds to finance the expansion and/or closure of the San Marcos Landfill and to provide financing for other necessary solid waste ~~:~~~&ii~~t~~~~rll~~~\~~~~~~~~~~~~l~li,\~I[lr_f;iJ!p~~ pro"ide a pi6cess, .. ... :f6iiipt6twelveiii6riths;b}iwhichthepart i es can mutually participate in dealing with regional solid waste matters; and to develop a permanent governance authority to deal with regional solid waste matters that will promote the long term health and safety of the residents of the COUNTY and the cities. Now, therefore, the undersigned COUNTY and Cities (collectively, "Member Agencies") agree to participate in good faith in the performance of this INTERIM AGREEMENT, and to act in a manner that conforms to the spirit, intent and general premises of this INTERIM AGREEMENT, and in accordance with the following: 1.0 MEMBERSHIP 1.1 COUNTY Membership. To be a. signatory of this INTERIM AGREEMENT and participate as a full member of the Interim Commission, the COUNTY is committing 100% of its Acceptable Waste flow in accordance with the provisions of Part 3 of this document. 1.2 city Membership. To be a signatory of this INTERIM AGREEMENT and participate as a full member of the Interim Commission, each city is committing at least 50%, and may commit up to 100%, of its Acceptable Waste flow in accordance with the provisions of Part 3 of this document. a. A member city committing at least 50% of its Acceptable Waste flow at the time of signing this document may, until December 1, 1993, deliver more than its committed Acceptable Waste to a COUNTY facility and such additional waste shall not be subject to the Economic Risk Surcharge set forth in this document at Part 3, section 3.6, subsection d. 1 .2:J rt:5' APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 2 b. On or before !t",!i\.ii!4:'y;l.il~94, a member city !!lay file a written addendum, in a form accepfiible to the Interim Commission, committing Acceptable Waste in addition to that committed in Section 1.2 (a) to the Interim Commission; on the terms set forth in section 3.10. 1.3 city of San Dieero MembershiD. Based on the City of San Diego's unique role in regional waste management issues, the city of San Diego may participate as an ex-officio non-voting member of the Interim commission. The COUNTY will negotiate a separate agreement with the City of San Diego which reflects the City of San Diego's unique role in regional waste management issues. Such agreement will be brought before the Commission for review and comment prior to adoption. 2.0 EFFECTIVE DATE, TERM 2.1 Effective Date. This INTERIM AGREEMENT shall take effect on June 22, 1993, by.. between. and ..alliorig'theCO'ON'i'ya:rida:nyo~the cities listed on Attachment A as have executed t.nis,c:ioc~eritonor before that date. 2.2 Term. Except as otherwise provided in Part 3 of this INTERIM AGREEMENT concerning the commitment and disposal of Acceptable Waste, the term of the INTERIM AGREEMENT shall expire on May 31, 1994, unless sooner terminated by creation of a permanent governance entity pursuant to Section 4.5(c). 3.0 COMMITMENT OF SOLID WASTE FLOW AND DISPOSAL OBLIGATION 3.1 Title. This Part of the INTERIM AGREEMENT shall be known as the "Flow Control Covenant." 3.2 Commitment of Acceptable Waste. To the extent allowed by law, each Member Agency agrees that the portion of its Acceptable Waste designated in the execution section of this document shall be delivered to the facility that the COUNTY reasonably designates. For purposes of this agreement, a 50% commitment constitutes the tonnage commitment for the respective cities as. set forth in Exhibit "A", until adjusted by the Interim Commission. The Interim commission may review the tonnage commitment and revise the apportionment. 2 .23/1 ,t, APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 3 3.3 Acceptable Waste Defined. a. "Acceptable Waste". is garbage, refuse, waste and other matter which is legally acceptable at a Class III landfill pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 23, Subchapter 15 or under such laws or regulations as are in effect at the time of disposal which is generated within its respective jurisdiction which, for the COUNTY, consists of the unincorporated area. Except: waste generated by a State or Federal governmental entity unless the Member Agency has exercised control over such waste and chooses to commit it; or waste generated by any person and tra~sported or disposed of by or on behalf of a self hauler hauling less than 50 tons per month. b. Each Member Agency shall have the right, without penalty, to recycle (as defined at Public Resource Code S 40180) any solid waste (as defined at Public Resources Code S 40191) by any means selected by the Member Agency and any such recycled material shall be excluded from the commitment otherwise made to the COUNTY by this Flow Control Covenant. However, if the residue of the recycling process which can legally be disposed of at a Class III landfill exceeds five percent (5%) of such recycled material, such process residue shall be returned to the System for disposal unless exempted by the COUNTY. 3.4 Enforcement of Flow Control. To the extent allowable by law, each Member Agency shall establish, implement and carry out a waste flow enforcement program which is sufficient to assure compliance with the Flow Control Covenant. This program may include to the extent necessary and appropriate in the circumstances, but shall not be limited to, (1) licensing, permitting or franchising haulers (on an exclusive or nonexclusive basis), upon the condition of compliance with the Flow Control Covenant, (2) adopting ordinances or resolutions requiring compliance with the Flow Control Covenant, and (3) taking enforcement actions under any such license, permit, franchise, ordinance or resolution. Direct municipal collection of Acceptable Waste shall not be required hereunder unless all other available means and methods of enforcing the Flow Control Covenant have been unsuccessful. If any event or circumstance (including without limitation a change or adverse interpretation of applicable law) impairs or precludes compliance with the Flow Control Covenant by the means or methods then being employed by the affected party, such party shall implement alternative or substitute means and methods to enable it to lawfully satisfy the terms and conditions of the Flow Control Covenant. If a change or interpretation in applicable law impairs or precludes either party from complying with the Flow Control 3 .2.3~ ''1 APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 4 Covenant by any means, such party shall use its best efforts, to the extent practicable and subject to indemnification by the COUNTY, to effectuate executive, legislative or judicial change in or relief from the applicability of such law so as to enable City lawfully to resume compliance with the Flow Control Covenant as soon as possible following such change or interpretation of applicable law. Compliance by the affected party with its obligations under this paragraph shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the its obligation to enforce the Flow Control Covenant. a. Power to Exercise Flow Control. Each Member Agency represents that it has the right, power and authority under existing applicable law to enter into, comply with, implement and enforce the Flow Control Covenant. Each party shall use good faith and best efforts to preserve, protect and defend its right and power to enter into, comply with, implement . and enforce the Flow Control Covenant in accordance herewith against any challenge thereto, legal or otherwise (including any lawsuits by or against such party, whether as plaintiff or defendant) by any person based upon breach of contract, violation of law or any other theory. b. consistency of Aareements. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, all licenses, permits, contracts, agreements, leases, franchises, ordinances and resolutions of the affected party which are lawfully in effect with or pertaining to any person relating to or affecting Acceptable Waste shall, if and to the extent necessary, be amended to provide explicitly that the affected party shall have the right without material restriction to direct the delivery of the committed Acceptable Waste in accordance with the Flow Control Covenant. On and after the Effective Date, the affected party shall not enter into, issue or adopt any license, permit, contract, agreement, lease, franchise, ordinance or resolution which is materially inconsistent with the Flow Control Covenant. 3.5 COUNTY's DisDosal Obliaation. In a manner that is economical, fiscally sound and reasonably protects the environment, the COUNTY agrees to dispose of the Acceptable Waste directed by Member Agencies to the COUNTY under this Flow Control Covenant. 4 r:J:J/1 .... Y APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 5 3.6 DisDosal Charaes. The COUNTY may only charge a Memper Agency for the disposition of Acceptable Waste by imposing a fee in an amount that does not exceed the COUNTY's cost for providing such disposal. All revenue, including interest earned thereon, from disposal charges shall be placed in the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund used only for solid waste purposes. a. TiD Fee to Member Aaencv. The Tip Fee charged by the COUNTY for the disposal of Acceptable Waste within the System shall be sufficient to fund the reasonable and necessary costs for operation, management and financing of the System, including: solid waste facility closure and post closure costs, solid waste facility and mitigation fees. For the disposal of Acceptable Waste the COUNTY shall charge all sources in the unincorporated area, and shall charge a Tip Fee for waste delivered from a Member Agency. (1) Solid Waste Faci1itv Fee. (a) To the extent allowed by law, the COUNTY shall charge a Facility Fee for waste delivered for processing or disposal to a system facility. The COUNTY shall pay-over the collected Facility Fee to the ci ty or COUNTY in the case of the unincorporated area in whose jurisdiction the facility is located to compensate the hosting member for the reoccurring impacts of having the facility within its jurisdiction. The Facility Fee shall initially be set at an amount equivalent to the appropriate percentage for the facility type (as described below), as that percentage of the Tip Fee in effect on January 1, 1993. Thereafter, the Facility Fee shall be adjusted automatically and concurrently with any increase in the Tip Fee, by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Tip Fee but not greater than five percent (5%) of the then current Facility Fee, whichever is less. (b) Facility types and percentage Of the Tip Fee* (In effect on January 1, 1993): o Landfill = 10% of Tip Fee ($2.80) o Mixed Solid Waste Material Recovery Facility = 7.5% of Tip Fee ($2.10) o Transfer Station = 5% of Tip Fee ($1.40) *For the section, Facility purpose of the calculation in this the Tip Fee does not include the Fee or the Mitigation Fee. 5 .2.:1/1 " APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 6 (c) If a jurisdiction has more than. one Facility at .the same location, or contiquous location, it would receive the higher of the applicable Facility Fees, but not more than one Facility Fee. (d) The Facility Fee for all future facilities shall be the Facility Fee for that type facility as of January 1, 1993 with adjustments as described in subsection (1), above. . 2. Mitiaation Fee. (a) To the extent allowed by law and commencing July 1, 1993, the COUNTY shall impose a Mitigation Fee for waste delivered to a system facility. The Mitigation Fee shall be in an amount that is five percent (5%) of the Tip Fee in effect on January 1, 1993. Thereafter, the Mitigation Fee shall be adjusted automatically and concurrently with any increase in the Tip Fee, by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Tip Fee or an amount not greater than five percent (5%) of the then current Mitigation Fee, whichever is less. (b) Mitigation Fee funds shall only be used for specific projects that correct a documented impact arising from a system facility. Any City or the COUNTY for the unincorporated area may apply to the COUNTY for a share of the Mitigation Fee funds. Mitigation Fee funds shall not be used for a mitigation measure which is required for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act or any other regulatory process. Moreover, any Member Agency which is receiving a Facility Fee for a particular facility will not be eligible to receive Mitigation Fee funds for that same facility. b. Economic Risk Surcharae. (1) To the extent allowed by law, in order to offset any increased costs to the system and account for any economic risks created by non-committed waste being deposited into the system, COUNTY may impose an Economic Risk Surcharge for the disposal of Acceptable Waste from a non-signatory source or from a Member Agency in excess of the portion of Acceptable Waste committed under the Flow Control Covenant. 6 .<:l/i ~/tJ APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All cities Page 7. (2) From ~9tY 1, 1993 to gy 1, 1994 the" surcharge shall not exceed fifty percehf"(SO%) of" the Tip Fee in effect at the time of the transaction, excluding the Solid Waste Facility Fee and the Mitigation Fee, if any. The criteria used to establish the Economic Risk Surcharge include but are not limited to: capital charges, the increased depletion rate of landfill capacity and timing effects. Economic Risk Surcharge funds shall only be used to pay for the costs of the operation, management and financing of the disposal system. 3.7 Protection of Flow Control Covenant. If any challenge raises issues common to the Member Agencies under this Flow Control Covenant, the COUNTY through the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund shall indemnify and hold harmless the affected party from the reasonable costs, fees and expenses properly allocable to defending such right and power. 3.8 Exoiration and Reversion of Flow Control Covenant. a. Exoiration. This Flow Control Covenant shall expire on the first of any of the following to occur: (1) No Bond Issue. As to all members, on May 31, 1994, unless the COUNTY first relies on the Flow Control Covenant in issuing bonds to finance the San Marcos facility expansion and/or closure and to provide financing for other solid waste projects in the approximate amount of $60 to $100 million; (2) Exoiration of Term of Bond. As to all members, if the COUNTY timely issues the bonds described above, the Flow Control Covenant shall expire upon the expiration of the term of such bonds or upon the refinancing of such bonds, but in no event later than 20 years from the date of the original bond issuance. (3) Imorooer Charqe. As to affected members, if the COUNTY imposes on a Member Agency a fee that is not consistent with this Flow Control Covenant and after 60 days written notice from the Interim Commission, COUNTY fails to adjust the fee so as to be in compliance with this Flow Control Covenant and fails to refund or grant a credit for any over-charges; 7 c2.1/?..// APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 8 (4) Failure To DisDose. As to affected members, if the COUNTY is unable to dispose of all of the committed Acceptable Waste from the member and after 60 days written notice from the Interim commission county fails to dispose of such waste; or (5) Leqal ImDossibilitv. As to affected members, if the law precludes a member from directing the flow of Acceptable Waste to the COUNTY. b. Reversion. (1) To Member. Covenant to the shall revert to Upon expiration of the Flow COUNTY, the member's commitment the committing member; Control of flow (2) To Interim commission. In the event that a permanent governance entity is not established pursuant to section 4.5 (c) any flow committed to the Interim commission shall be retained by the Commission, as allowed by law, otherwise to the Member Agency. (3) To Permanent Enti tv. If a permanent governance entity acceptable to the Interim Commission is established pursuant to Section 4.5 (c), the member's commitment of flow shall be assigned to that permanent entity on the terms specified in the document creating the permanent entity. 3.9 continuation of Interim Commission. Notwithstanding Section 2.2 hereof, the Interim commission established in Part 4 shall continue to exist so long as is necessary to accomplish the purposes of Part 3. 3.10 Flow Commitment to Interim commission. Interim commission shall be subject to the the Member Agencies: Flow commitment to the following covenants of a. The commitment shall be for the same term of the initial commitment made to the COUNTY. b. The COUNTY shall dispose of the commitment to the Interim Commission without surcharge until May 31, 1994. c. In the event that a permanent governance entity is established pursuant to section 4.5(C), the flow committed to the Interim commission shall be assigned to that entity. In the event that such an entity is not established, the Interim Commission shall retain the commitment. 8 ~:3/)'/~ APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 9 3.11 Allecration of Breach. In the event that a Meml:!er Agency alleges that another Member Agency has breached any part of this Part 3 or Section 4.6 the dispute shall be submitted to the Interim Commission; the determination of the Interim Commission shall constitute a rebuttable presumption of compliance with or breach of such part or section. 4.0 ESTABLISHHENT OF Interim Commission 4.1 Establishment. There is hereby established the Interim commission to accomplish the purposes set forth herein; 4.2 ComDosition. The Interim Commission shall consist of one commiss10ner from the County of San Diego who shall be a Supervisor; one commissioner from each member city who shall be a mayor or councilperson: and one ex-officio commissioner from the City of San Diego who shall be a mayor or councilperson. Commissioners shall be appointed by their respective governing bodies which may also appoint an alternate commissioner. 4.3 Procedures. The Interim Commission shall be subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code SS 54950 et ~) and shall adopt regulations to govern its internal operation. a. A Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson shall be chosen by the Interim Commission. b. The Commission shall meet at least once each month on the Commission's established regular meeting date. c. Special meetings may be called at the request of three commissioners with a minimum of 72 hours notice to all members of the Interim commission. d. A majority of the commissioners shall constitute a quorum. e. Actions shall be determined by a majority vote of the commissioners, based on one vote per Member Agency. The Interim Commission may amend this document to establish procedures for a "Weighted Vote." 4.4 Staff for Interim Commission. The COUNTY agrees to provide such County administrative staff as requested by the Interim Commission. The Interim Commission may request assistance from the staffs of the members. 9 ,;J:J/I "I :J APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 10 4.5 Role of Interim Commission. a. Advice. The Interim Commission shall provide advice to the Board of Supervisors of the COUNTY on the following matters that concern solid waste facilities, operation, rates and financing: capital projects 1n excess of $50,000, disposal alternatives if the San Marcos site is closed, other disposal options, outside-county disposal, intra-county transfer of solid waste and Tip Fees. b. Notice and ODDortunitv to Advise. Before considering a solid waste matter listed in Section 4.5 (al, the COUNTY will provide to the Interim Commission a full staff report on each solid waste matter to be addressed by the COUNTY's Board of Supervisors; in sufficient time for the Interim Commission to consider the matter on the agenda of the Interim Commission's regular meeting. The COUNTY is not required to comply with this process when an emergency condition must be addressed and there is insufficient time for compliance. In the event of such emergency, the COUNTY shall provide a staff report to an Executive Committee appointed by the Interim commission. c. DeveloD Permanent Governance Entitv. The Interim Commission shall consider alternative organizational structures, including a joint powers agreement, for exerting a unified effort to accomplish regional, solid waste Objectives. No later than May 31, 1994, the Interim Commission shall develop a permanent governance entity designed to maximize the members' collective strength in pursuing their interests in disposing of solid waste. The permanent governance entity: (1) Shall include all participating cities and the COUNTY; (2) Shall be empowered to contract for solid waste processing and disposal; and (3) May be empowered to (a) take over and operate the COUNTY facilities, (b) create new facilities and (c) contract with outside providers. d. provide Interim AcceDtable Waste DisDosal. The Interim Commission shall for disposal of Acceptable Waste flow committed to the Commission. 2 10 ,;3/J .)0/ APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 11 4.6 Attainina SUb-Reaional DisDosal Obiectives. During the term of this INTERIM AGREEMENT, the COUNTY and the other Member Agencies agree: a. Process. To plan and implement the objective of providing facilities' to meet the waste disposal needs of the var~ous sUb-regions of the County of San Diego, without unreasonably impacting another sUb-region in an adverse manner. Any dispute shall be resolved by the Interim Commission in accordance with Section 3.11. b. North Countv DisDosal oDtion. The County will use its best efforts to provide a North County disposal option. c. Waiver of GeoaraDhic Obiection. On condition that the covenants set forth in Section 4.6{a) and (b) are being performed, not to object, on the basis of geographic origin, to the direction of Acceptable Waste to any facility. 5.0 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 5.1 Withdrawal. a. Procedure. If any Member Agency requests to withdraw from this INTERIM AGREEMENT, the Interim Commission shall calculate the impact on the system of such agency's withdrawal taken in conjunction with all other members desiring to withdraw, and shall thereafter formulate, in negotiation with all such agencies, a set of final terms and conditions for early withdrawal which will become effective upon approval of the Interim Commission. b. Limitation On Withdrawal Charaes/Penalties. There shall be no charge or penalty imposed on the withdrawing Member Agency if the reason for withdrawal is the expiration of the Flow Control Covenant as to the withdraWing member. c. Survival. section 5.1 shall survives. Notwithstanding survive as long Section 2.2 hereof, this as the Interim Commission 5.2 Notices. All notices, demands or requests pursuant to this INTERIM AGREEMENT shall be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any member shall be deemed to have been properly given or served: a. On the date of actual personal service; or 11 dJ/1-1f APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 12 b. On the date actually received, if deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party at the address of the Member Agency's regular meeting chambers, or other address designated by the Member, postage prepaid, registered or certified, and with return receipt requested. 5.3 Non-Severabilitv. In the event that a substantive provision of this INTERIM AGREEMENT shall be determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith such amendments, modifications, or supplements to this INTERIM AGREEMENT or such other appropriate action as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties as reflected herein. If negotiations in good faith fail, the INTERIM AGREEMENT, including the Flow Control Covenant, is terminated. 5.4 Waiver of Breach. No breach of any provision herein can be waived unless in writing. Waiver of anyone breach of any provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same or other provision hereof. 5.5 Remedies. All Parties hereto shall have the right to commence any action at law or equity, including specific performance, to remedy a breach of the terms herein, provided that neither Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement except as provided herein. 5.6 No Third Partv Riqhts. There are no third party beneficiaries of this Agreement. No action may be commenced to enforce this Agreement, except by a Member Agency. 5.7 CounterDarts. This counterparts. document shall be executed in 12 02:1/9 'I/' APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have signed this INTERIM AGREEMENT as of the dates set forth. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO committing 100% of its Acceptable Waste flow Date: CITY OF LA MESA committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: By: ATTEST: SUPERVISOR By: ATTEST: MAYOR CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF CARLSBAD committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF LEMON GROVE committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: By: By: MAYOR MAYOR ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF CHULA VISTA committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF NATIONAL CITY committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: By: By: MAYOR MAYOR ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK 13 .J;J/?"l? /d3A-19 APPROVED Amended BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 14 CITY OF CORONADO committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF OCEANSIDE committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: By: ATTEST: MAYOR By: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF DEL MAR committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF POWAY committing % of its Acceptable waste flow. Date: By: ATTEST: By: MAYOR MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF EL committing Acceptable Date: CAJON % of its Waste flow. CITY OF SAN MARCOS committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: MAYOR By: ATTEST: By: ATTEST: MAYOR CITY CLERK CITY CLERK 14 ..234") r APPROVED BY STEERING COMMITTEE, 11 May 1993 Amended for Signature by Any or All Cities Page 15 CITY OF ENCINITAS committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF SANTEE _ committing % of its Acceptable waste flow. Date: By: By: MAYOR MAYOR ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF ESCONDIDO committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF SOLANA BEACH committing % of its Acceptable waste flow. Date: By: By: MAYOR MAYOR ATTEST: ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK CITY OF IMPERIAL BEACH committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: CITY OF VISTA committing % of its Acceptable Waste flow. Date: By: MAYOR By: ATTEST: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK CITY CLERK 15 .:l:J/f -; / ATTACIlMENT "A" CITY WASTESTREAM COMKITKENT* Member Aaencv Waste Tons Chula vista Oceanside Escondido El Cajon Vista Carlsbad National City Encinitas La Mesa Santee Poway San Marcos Imperial Beach Coronado Lemon Grove Solana Beach Del Mar 82,399 80,450 65,566 52,430 44,028 38,149 34,065 32,844 31,399 31,289 26,371 24,854 15,767 15,503 14,327 7,663 2.875 600,000 * Calculation utilizes July 1992 population figures as approved by SANDAG .;):J/1" .2.0 JlJL-02-'93 FRI 09:53 ID:CITY OF CHI..l.A VISTA TEL NO:!'i19--691-5171 --.- 11010 P02 07102/13 08:43 11018 BT4 zaaa co OIl BOLID IIsm _ CHVU. VISTA. III OOZ/003 ..' . Attachment 2 PROPOSED 1M~NDMRNT TO INTERrM AGR~MMKHT! AT THE UI'l'ElUHSOLID WASTE COMMISSION HBETING ON "ONE 30, 1993, THE INTERIM COMMISSJ:ON UNANIMOUSLY RBCOKMEJilDBD AN AMENDMENT TO THB nINTBRIH AaREEMENT ESTABLISHING AN INTBRIH SOLID WASTB COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR' THB DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE." THE AMENDMBNT WOULD EXTEND AN OPPOR'1'UNITlC To NON-IIBIIBIR CITIES nICH Dro NOT SIGN THE INTBRIM AGREEMENT, OR WICK SIGNED THE INTBRIM AcmEEMBNT WITH COND:ITIONS THAT PREC1.UDE THI!:M I'ROK BB:ING KEMBERS OF THE INTJ:RD[ COMMISSION, '1'0 JOJ:N THE COMKI88J:ON BY SJ:GNING THE INTERIM AGREBMBNT ON,OR &BFORE JULY 23, 151513. TO BE EFFBCTIVB, 'l'H1!: AHEND!lEN'l' MUST BZ'ADOP'l'1!:D IY EACH JUlUSDICTION 'l!HAT IS CU1Ul.ENTLY A VOTING KEMBER OF THE COJOaSSION: 'l!HJ: CITXES OF ,CORONADO, LA MESA, LEMON CROVE, POWAY, NATIONAL CXTY,' SAN MARCOS AND SOLANA B~CH, 1\lfD THB COUNTY or SAN DIECO. THE AMENDMENT KUST ALSO BE ADDED TO THE INTERIM AGRBEMENT BY ANY CITY tJ'l'ILIZING THIS ,OPPORTUNITY TO SICN 'l'HE AGREEMENT AND BECOME A MEMBEIl. OF THB COMMISSION. THE AMENDMENT WOULD RULACE SBCTION ,2. 1 OF TIlE AMtNDED l:N'1'Ill'tXK AGREEMENT WITH TME FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: This l:N'1'ERIM 'AGREBKBNT Bhall take etteat as or June 22, 1993, ,by, between and amon~ the COUNT~ and any ot the Cities li.ted on AttachDent A aa have executed this dogument em or betore July 23, 1993. ALL OTHER TERKS AND CONDl:'rIONS OF THE INTERIM AGREEMENT WOULD RDtAIN UNCHANliED. ATTACHED IS THE AMENDMENT WHICH YOUR CITY SHOULD SIGN AND RETURN TO THE COUNTY. IF YOU HAVE ANY, QUE5'l'J:ONS PJ:.IASE CALL LIN WURBS IN THE SOLID WASTE'DXVISl:ON (9~4-2729): ' ' - :23.19 - 2.) JUL-02-'93 FRl 09:53 ID:CITY OF CHl.LA~STf!._~ i'IJ:619-691-S171__ ~1!,'-~._ 07l02/U oe, u eue .,4 2838 co SO SOLID lI8TIl ___ CIIllU VISTA iii 001/001 .... Ai: :1:1:8 regularly eohedullld ~..tinq gn July , lP93, the city councilor the City gt' llqreed. to the followinq amencllllent to the llrNTERIM AGRB~ABt.ISHING AN tNTDIN SOLm HASTB COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSAL 01" SOLID WASTB" (the "Interim A;reementll): SEC'I'ION 2. 1 OF THE AMENDED l:NTEJUK AGREBMBN'l' SHALL BE RBPLACBD WITH THB FOLLOWING LANGUAGE: This %NTERIM AGRBEMENT .ball take effect aa of June 22. liP3, by, between an4 alllonq the COUNTY and llny of the ci ti.. URed on Attachment A .. have ax.c~.d thie document on or before July 23, un. . ~3/J-.22. Attachment 3 LIST OF NON-SIGNATORY CITY CONCERNS/CONDITIONS Citv Concerns/Conditions Imperial Beach El Cajon No bonds be issued without a majority vote of the Commission * Chula Vista 1) Cap be placed on rate escalation during the flow commitment 2) Host fees be paid to jurisdictions with landfills 3) The amount of waste kept out of the wastestream by recycling not be counted against the City 4) Costs for facilities not approved by participating jurisdictions not be passed on to those jurisdictions 5) No new cost liabilities assumed for facili ties that had not been used by the participating jurisdictions and for which the jurisdictions were not previously liable 6) Some agreement on governance and authority prior to the issuance of debt 7) Minimal or no General Fund liability Carlsbad 1) Flow commitment of 100% for up to three years at "pay-as-you-go" rate, Le. no bonds 2) Uniform tip fee for all participants 3) Commission to continue to consider North County disposal options, capital improvement and funding plans, and permanent governance 4) Right to withdraw from Agreement without penalties if conditions not met 5) These conditions amend Agreement and control in event of conflict Escondido 1) Creation of permanent regional governance overseen by independent agency such as SANDAG, prior to any flow commitment 2) Explore other disposal alternatives, including economic analysis of cost- effectiveness of long-term operation of NCRRA 3) No debt to be issued until decision made on permanent governance 4) Commitment of flow contingent on formation of new governance and city's decision to participate in the new governance .) 3/1'" .2..J City Conditions Page 2 Del Mar 1) Uniform tip fee 2) Commission to approve any bonding 3) Study "equity" issue regarding built-out cities v. growth cities 4) Favor "pay-as-you-go" rates until issues settled 5) Term of Agreement to be 7 years with 2 year notice to exit 6) Clause regarding reduction of waste per AB 939, i.e. allow Commission to change allocation of tonnage commitment 7) Flow commitment not mad unless permanent governance acceptable to city Santee 1) City to be considered host city or guaranteed a mitigation fee 2) Commitment to site North County landfill and not consider Sycamore as option to not doing so 3) Waiver of surcharge for 5 years 4) Be allowed to object to Sec. 4.6C of the Agreement re: geographic basis for location of replacement landfills 5) City not to be held in violation pending completion of franchise implementation process Vista 1) Tip fee set as "pay-as-you-go" rate, i.e. no bonding 2) Commitment contingent on formation of new governance and city's decision to participate in new governance * The concern regarding no bonding unless by majority approval of the Interim Commission was also registered by three signatory cities: poway, Coronado and Solana Beach. .23/1,), r ~V?~ ::::~_: ~~~~ ~~~.;:- CllY OF CHULA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY July 2, 1993 FROM: Councilwoman Shirley Horton (,Z~ Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney~ North cities JPA Meeting with regard to Alternative Refuse Disposal Procurement Options TO: RE: At your request, I attended the meeting of the North cities JPA, which was held July 1, 1993, commencing at 10:30 a.m. The following information, which I consider to be most significant coming out of the meeting, is as follows: 1. The North County cities JPA consists of the Cities of Oceanside, Carlsbad and Escondido which, together, have a wastestream currently of about 350,000 tons per year, or about 22% of the entire County wastestream' 2. The North cities JPA intends to issue a request for proposals to companies capable of transporting and/or disposing of the solid waste from these three cities. 3. Disposal locations that may be interested in making proposals to handle the North County cities wastestream are shown on a map which was distributed at the meeting, a copy of which is being attached hereto as Exhibit A, and include the following prospective landfill options: 1. The East Carbon Development Company in utah. 2. The Franconia Landfill in Arizona. IPlease compare this to our own flow of approximately 170,000 tons per year or 10.5% of the wastestream. ~3;')'.2.5 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISl . "'9'0/(6'9) 691-5037 Councilwoman Shirley Horton July 2, 1993 Page 2 3. The Rail-Cycle Landfill proposed to be built between Barstow and the Colorado River. 4. The Eagle Mountain Landfill Facility in Riverside County. 5. The InterailjWestern Waste Facility in Imperial County. 6. The Campo Indian Reservation Landfill Facility in Campo. 7. The Prima Deschecha in Orange County. 8. The Bee Canyon Landfill in Orange County. 9. The EI Sobrante Landfill in Riverside County. Not shown on the map due to some clerical error is the Chiquita Canyon Landfill in Los Angeles near Six Flags Magic Mountain and the Bradley Landfill, also somewhere in Los Angeles County. The attached map also shows the train routes that may be available to these various facilities. Please note that the closest rail route to Campo has been washed out by recent rains. In addition to the foregoing, and not shown on the map is the City of San Diego facility at Miramar. Of course, we are all familiar with the current County waste disposal system consisting of the three landfills, one of which is in our city. Also attached hereto as Exhibit B is an exhibit showing the list of the various landfill alternatives, their status, their estimated tipping fee if known and their distance from the North County facility: Please note that the Prima Deschecha facility is considering waste importation at $32.75 per ton at the gate and is 45 miles away from the North County cities. The EI Sobrante Landfill facility is applying for permits for expansion of the facility and importation of waste. They expected it to be operational in January of 1994 at $34.50 per ton gate fee and is 50 miles from the North County cities. Waste Management's Rail-CYCle facility is proposing to soon be operational and is expected to charge a fee in the mid-50' s per ton for both transport and disposal! The Bradley Landfill in Los Angeles operated by Waste Management is c'lrrently operational without restrictions and has a $25-$33 per ton gate fee and is 100 miles away. The JPA expressed the desire for non-signatoryjnon-participating cities in the Interim commission to join with them to achieve economies of scale, if at all possible. .).J/I....;.? CITY OF CHULA VISTA Councilwoman Shirley Horton July 2, 1993 Page 3 A copy of the complete workshop presentation made by their consultant, Harvey Gershman from GBB is available in my office and will be copied upon your request or the requests of any other Councilperson. I was also able to make brief contact with Mid-American Waste Systems, the operator for the Campo facility through its Vice- President of Landfill Operations, Mr. R. Jay Roberts (614) 833-9155 who expressed interst in talking to us, as a City customer. Please call if you have any questions. I am at extension 5038. BMB: 19k Enc. cc: City Council City Manager F; \home\attomey\jpanol1h P.S. Please note the article documenting the recent trend in Federal Court decisions which have ruled that flow control ordinances are illegal as a violation of the Interstate Commerce Clause of the Federal Constitution attached as Exhibit "C". :;:1/1-,).. 7 CITY OF CHULA' '_ ctS ....-1 ~ rf:J ~ C,) ..8 .5 ....-1 ~ - ctS - U ....-1 ctS ~ ~ 5;"'0 ...c: ~ ...... ctS ::J CIJ 0 C,) Cf) ...... ....-1 0 ..... Cf) .5 0_ " ~ E CIJ ctS ell ~ CIJ c 0 0 "l ....-1 ~ ...... ctS .;!3 ~O ~ j~ 1::2 ~5 E::> 0.- .2~ ~.. ~ e- 00 Cu ~ .. u ;; ~ UJ ~ i ~ ~~ ;r~ li.2 ::;;'i ~u. -U;~ ~~ UJ" -' C u~ G .:. ~ u. '" C>. ::> hu El !E /i."iiii,g ~ -cc=Q.. .g~~E EU.C>.~ U5 Jl:5cll - . . . ? EXHIBIT "A" o u X UJ ::; c .Q ;; c: " ~ " a::_ c " ,$I 5 ,,- c.2 "H E" ~ C uj "i: o ., l! " 0. o :;: .5l' e !!> U. '" > 5 if ! .E :l: ~ al ~ 9 ,i :il ~ :l u~ .J! "''' C '0 0. :J .i~.E.I en ~,,~!l e5 ~ ~ ~sUc .;.; ~~:su ~ H .. . 'I>:> ~-l! a:~~(I)~ <l E 0 J3/1" ~ 2"" I ~ N "" t' c u : .. c u E u g) a c a ~ J! '" ~ "a ~ l:' c :>> o u z. .. .. o Z 00 .... u Q) ........ o ~ ~ - m 00 o ~ 00 .~ a Q) .... m !:: ~ Q) .... - < ""'-"t o 00 .... rJ) o U "'0 !:: m rJ) ::J .... m .... (jJ "t:l 6.... 0_ o b rn '"' = ~ ~CLl= ~ u 6 =,e.>> .:g = !'O .~ ::I ~ o 0 dJ . u = .. ... 0 rn__ ~t:: o Z ..-.. S ;j S ~ :5 .. ~ I c:: S ~ S .9 -- U .... , ........ Q) .. It'') Q) rn l:'-....... ~ . Q) ~N .. C(') Cl:l ~ 00 Q) tip.. ~gz oo~ ~ .S 0 .. '"'..... !'O Q)"OO V5 ~ ~ .S r./)o-e g g. 5 U .::l c.. .. tJ ~ '- o '"' ~ ;.c: tJ s~ o u U gj Q)O 00Cl:l ~ .s o~ o o ....-I c:: o ..... .. Cl:l S Q) '"'- -B...o .6 ~ o Cl:l Z ~ - Cl:l '"' Q) -e Q) ~ -e Q).. :> ..... "Qj S u '"' ~~ ""' Q) a~ ..... ..... -e;:E .5........ - o~ c....... S] Cl:l Cl:l U..J o N N c:: o ..... .. Cl:l S Q) 1-1_ -B~ .6 ~ o Cl:l Z ~ o It'') Q) ~ Q) .. Cl:l 00 c:: o .. ........ o ,It'') I . ~ C(') ~ g c:: ..... 0 "0 ~ ........... U) ~ a "j3 ~ :~Q)c.. t::Cl:l S 0.. >< Q) c.. ~~Q) p..><c:: "" !:O ... Q) 0 c..o ~ - I-I',p oou...... ~-B.1S .S 1S b< .,8 SO tl 6~~ ~ ~~ , ,1: - Q) .. r./) ~ ~ a........ 1-1 ~ E .g-e~ Cf) c:: r./) _Cl:l~ ~..J;;> c:: 1-1 Q) .. r./) ~ ........ - ..... Cl:l Q) 1-1" Q) r./) ]~ dJ/7 ...2. Cf EXHIBIT "B" o N N r./) .. 's ~ ~ 1-1 -e ti Q) 1-1 Q) c..Cl:lr\ ... 0 - -e,.,...>< Q) - Q) :> 1-1 .. O Q) U .. ..... ~~ ~ b< c..;;> ..... 0\ Cl:l~O....-l ~!:OI-I- _ 0..... ~ ~J::<~ ........ .S Cl:l g o ;:E Q) - 00_ Cl:l~ ~i:O I.. is (0) M >- '" C II : - c II E II m g c . ! III j "'CI .- "0 1ft ~ C ~ o u ~ o Z "0 I e .... 0_ o J: fI) ... c ~ i'. UJ -. "4-Icu:= I "'d ~ U e 0 is 0 /0 Q) 0 0 11m ;:i c::.e-~ C'tj L!J ~ '00 c: .:! c:: lU J J ..... .~ ::s ~ ....... o 0 dJ C . U c 0 -..c: 0 U ~t::- - -- 0 ctl ~ rf) Z ~ ....... c.. 0,) 0,) U .. rJJ 0,) ~ Q) !:: .... -- \\ .,......, o"'d 0,)-""':' 0,) 0 ~ .::::~ - ---..J - ~ - ctl ~~ ctl ~ fI) e rJJ _ Q .. ... - u:'= ~-& ~~ !:: C\S 0 fI) :g ~ \ - rf) ~ ......J& ...... 0 :E ctl C'tj. 0 ('f')~ N 0... f;P.r.b f;P.r f;P.r rf) ..... Q --~ .., C"'l Q) . .. "'d . ....... / C\S !:: 0,) ~ C 0- rJJ .... U rJJ " - 0,) !:: c ~ ctl c.. !:: 0 GI Q) ., 0 fI) - >< - - .... : ....... 8 0,) ctl ctl .... I - - = !:: !::t !:: .S:l -< - ...- .. ctl . ... ctl C'tj 0 o .... .9 .b c - y.:>0\ .... .... ... GI - -- _ rJJ ~ CJ'j 500\ ctl ctl rJJ ctl 0,) E 0 . ...~ ... !~~ ...~ GI ~ c.. 0,) 0,) 0,) at rf) 8- 8-z a ....... ~ c.. ie c en ctl_ a 0 2: U .. 0,) .2! - - III "'d .E:l ~ .. rJJ ~ -- ..... ctl c: rJJ -0 0,) ~~ ~~ lat) -- . ." C\S - -0......- - 5 .- ~~ !:: la rJJ !:: !:: - en ,!:: 0 0,) 0,) e 0,) 0,) OS>, lit ;:i - ~QjS y uS 0,) ctl ~ 'Z~ .e c..!:: ....... ~ 0,) >,000,) C\S .- >, ~~ ctl 0 ctl C 0 0!::00 0,) ~ 00 ~ ....... ... Uctlctl u 0 ctl ..... ctl u"'" c.. 0 Cf'J ~ I la- !:: N la ]rJJla - g; S u ~ !:: ctl .... rJJ 0,) 0 .J: ctl :E ctl ... ... :E ...0:E ~OU ~ rJ) ~< a:l~ t 0 .J.,JA .,:10') z REcENr COURf DECISIONS o "FLow CONIRO~' ORD EXHIBIT "e" ess than one month apart, both a federal appellate court and district court declared unlawful on Commerce Clause grounds attempts by local planning authorities to finance the construction and operation of municipal solid waste (MSW) management facilities by requiring that all MSW within each authority's jurisdiction go to publicly owned facilities. This type of ordinance, which prohibits the disposal of MSW at any point other than a "desig- nated facility" within the jurisdiction of a state, munic- ipality, or planning authority, is commonly referred to as "flow control." At least 26 states now expressly grant localities or state agencies the power to implement flow control. On Feb. 18, 1993, the U.S. Court of Appea1s for the Eighth Circuit upheld a lower court's permanent injunc- tion against flow control ordinances of two Minneso- ta counties forming the Prairie Land Solid Waste Board, created to ensure construction and operation of an $8-million composting facility (Waste Systems Corp. v. Counties of Martin and Faribault, Minnesota, 8th Cir., Feb. 18, 1993). Waste Systems, a fIrm operating a sanitary landfIll in neighboring Iowa, also collected MSW in the Minnesota counties and disposed of the waste in its Iowa landfill for $30 per ton, as opposed to $72 per ton charged by the composting facility. The court found that Waste Systems' landfill exceeded Iowa's environmental standards. The Eighth Circuit said the flow control ordi- nances were "economic protectionist measures" because their purpose was to "insulate the plant from compe- tition with cheaper out-of-state alternatives." The coun- ties' designation plans clearly stated that flow control was necessary for the financial success of the com- posting facility and, when discussing less restrictive methods for assuring waste delivery, the plans repeat- edly noted a major reason why less restrictive methods were not financially feasible-cheaper disposal alter- natives existed in Iowa and adjoining counties. The counties argued that the flow control ordi- nances were even-handed and placed only incidental burdens on interstate commerce. They pointed to a pro- vision in the ordinances that would allow an out-of-state "resource recovery plant" (including similar compost- ing facilities or waste-to-energy plants) to seek an exclu- sion from the ordinances. Thus, the counties argued that the discrimination is not against interstate com. merce, but only between landfills-which may not apply for the exclusion-and resource recovery facilities, ~J~"::J I . -- APRil 1993 .amlll 115 .,...~"-J._'I',-_';;_ -""'I'!:,,,,".'~'::;:-~ ;,.- ,,... COII"O' [ootrl. (". ~~~ =~~~~- The court rejected this The Eighth . rcuit Iyzed the ordinances of three argument as "illusory" because representative cities, each of the exclusion expressly was con- aid the 1'10 which was required under ditioned upon a determination S' J ' the "user contract" with the that it could be granted only ordinances authority to impose flow "without impairing the finan- control. cial viability of the facility."" . .. The key argument of Moreover, the court observed economlc protectlonlst the cities and authority was that there were presently no that they were exempt from resource recovery facilities with- measures. " Commerce Clause restraints in a reasonable hauling distance under the "market -partici- of the counties' facility that pant" exception. Simply stat- would qualify for the exclusion. ed, this judicial exception Additionally, the burden on to the Commerce Clause interstate commerce was not provides that where a state incidental, according to the court, because under the ordi- or political subdivision acts as a =det-participant rather nances, about 10,400 tons of MSW per year, which is than as a market-regulator, its conduct is not subject to approximately 40% of the counties' MSW, is barred from Commerce Clause restraints. Thus, within the last several interstate commerce. years, various federal courts have upheld the right of state Finally, the court noted that the ordinances are no or municipally owned disposal facilities to exclude out- less discriminatory on interstate commerce because they of-state waste. The underpinning of this exception is also prevent the flow ofMSW across county in-state bor- based on the idea that the use of a publicly financed dis- ders. This follows the major decision by the U.S. Supreme posal facility may properly be allocated to those citizens Court last year in Fort Gmtwt Sanitary Landfill, lru:. v. MuM who pay taxes to support the facility. Where a state or gan Department of Natural Resources, 112 S. Ct. 2019 local government acts as a true market participant, it is (1992), holding that a law or regulation that burdens all subject to the same conditions and restrictions as is any or substantially all of interstate commerce is no less private participant in providing goods or services. In unconstitutional simply because it also burdens some other words, a private facility operator would not be intra-state commerce. subject to the Commerce Clause if it decided to exclude out-of-state waste from its facility, so a publicly owned facil- Exception does not shield publicly owned facilities ity acting as a market participant should enjoy the same On Jan. 28, 1993, a federal district court in Alaba- benefits. ma enjoined the imposition of flow control ordinances However, the court clearly found that in signing the by four Alabama counties, and 36 cities and towns with- user contracts, the counties and cities entered the solid in the jurisdiction of the counties, as part of an effort to waste market "not to compete for their own individual guarantee the economic stability of the proposed con- profit, as with private businesses, but rather they did so struction of a regional disposal facility and three trans- to assure the economic success of the authority. The fer stations by a solid waste disposal authority (Waste Recy. expressed intent behind these contracts and the three rep- cling Inc. v. Southeast Alnbama Solid Waste Disposal Author. resentative ordinances based on them is not indh'idual it.v, N.D. Ala., Jan. 18, 1993). Again, the court found market participation, but broad market regulation." that the purpose and effect of the ordinances was to The court also pointed out that to reinforce the finance the authority's facilities by isolating and thus restrictions in the ordinances, the contracts further pro- "insulating its four<ounty region from the rough and turn. hibited the local governments from authorizing or approv. ble of interstate commerce and the economic competi- ing any competing disposal sites within their borders, pro- tion that comes with it." hibited firms who failed to comply with the ordinance, The plaintiffs, primarily a group of haulers, collect- from using public streets to collect and haul MSW, and ~ ed and disposed of approximately 25% of the MSW in threatened civil enforcement and misdemeanor penalties the southeastern Alabama region covered by the author. against violators. The court said that: "These are not the ity. Two haulers disposed of most of their MSW at a land- types of measures E!:!vate participants in the market- fill situated in Jackson County, Fla., south of the Alaba. place could implement.':: 116 .muI. APRil 1993 .2:1/9 ".3.1. '10. c.."., [ootrl. Finally, as with all federal courts that have addressed flow control, the coun rejected arguments that there are no viable alternatives to the construction of a publicly owned regional waste disposal facility and no means of financing the project other than with flow control ordi- nances. Indeed, the court observed that the Alabama Solid Waste Disposal Act authorizes the issuing of war- rants secured by the full faith and credit of the authori- ty's participating local governments, and additional financing alternatives include ad valorem taxes or utility bill assessments. In the summer of 1992, a federal district coun also issued an injunction against a Mecklenburg County, N.C., flow control ordinance enacted to ensure the fman- cial vitality of a proposed waste-to-energy plant (Con. tainer Corp. of Carolina v. Mecklenburg County, w.P., N .c., June 14, 1992). However, until the plant is constructed, the waste is designated to a landfill that charges $37.50 per ton, as opposed to $29.50 per ton, which was the tip- ping fee at a South Carolina landfill owned by a hauler who also collected the MSW in Mecklenburg County. The hauler, Container Corp. of Carolina, serves over 7,500 res- idential commercial customers in the county and collects roughly 10,000 tons per month. I ~ . CIRCLE NO. 206 ON READER SER'tICE CARD 118 WISTlAIIAPRI11993 :l3t9''!3J 07109/93 10: 32 fJ'614 833 9173 1l.A.W.S.- CORP. 1i!I002 MId-American Waste Systems, Inc. 1006 Walnut SIr.et P.O. Box 156 Canal Winchester. Ohio 43110 Pbo"" (614) 833.9155 , FAX (51';) aaa.917. July 9, 1993 VIA FA~~TM'I.R . The Honorable Mayor and Council Members Oty Hall , , 276 Fourth Avenue OIula Vista, CA. 91910 Dear Mayor and Connell Members; , I am writing to pIOYide yoa ~nformaLion on the Campo Solid Waste Mimagement ProjecL We are conflclent that Campo can provide a timely 3Jld economically competitive solid waste management alternative' for the cities of San Diego County; The Campo Solid Waste Management Project is loCated on the Campo Band of Mission Indians Resen-aUon approKimately 60 miles from Chula Vi~ra. The project consists of a 400 acre sanitary landfill which wilJ. be pennitted to accept 3,000 tOns.per day of non-hazardous municipal solid waSle. Access to the site is either by truck via Interstate 8 or rail via the Santa Fe aIid San Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad~. ' ,,' Mid-American Waste Systems, Inc. will construct and operate the landfiiJ. in accordance willi the terms of a sublease Wlth Muht-Hei, Tnc. an econ,omic development corporation of the Canipo Band. As the project is on Native American Lands, it required an ~"iromnental Impact Statement and final sublease approval by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. The facility will be permitted by the Campo Environmental Protection Agency whose role is .im;lar to that of a "Local Rnforcement Agency" in Cl!lifomia. Additionally, Campo EPA has entered into a cooperative agreement with the State of California in accordance with .Assemoly' Bill 240. Essentially the Cooperative Agreement provides a IIICChanism for California regulatory agencies, to review regulations, permits, and enfotccmcnt actions of Campo BPA to assure thnt they are "functionally equivalent" to California standards without the state imposing its jurisdiction.. The preceding is a very brief synopsis of the project and the regulatory scheme thai. has been developed. We will be happy to answer any detailed q!lestions that may arise;. Starns of the project today is as follows; , , . On Aprll 27, 1993, Secretary of Interior Bab1?itt granted approval ofli!eproject's Environmenlal Impact Statement and leases. ' , . On April 27, and 28, 1993 the California Wale1' Resources Control Board and the Integrated Waste Management Board fOUnd the tentative Authority to Consll'Uct permit issued by Campo EPA on December 3, 1992, to be functionally equivalent to state standards. ' ' , ' . Final issuance of the Campo EPA construction permit is sshe4uled for Mid.,uly 1993. . Consll'Uction will requlre six months to cOmplete. . Site operation'is scheduled to begin in ru:st quarter, 1994. o Printed on Rc~dP.dPaper ~3"''' .:if 07/09/93 10:33 US14 833 9173 1l.A.W.S.- CORP. IgJ 003 July 9, 1993 The Honorable Mayor & Council Menibers Uty Hall ' Chula Vista, CA. 91910 Page 2 We are prepared to begin negotiations with Chula Vista and other cities for long-tenn tr3J1llportation and disposal contracts. The first year transportation and disposal cost is estimated, to be in the ..ange of $38 to $42 per ton. Annual increases would be based on a ~tage of the San Diego CPl. We view the current situation in San Diego Collnty as highly competitive between the numerous public and private corporations and therefore request that this infom>ation be keptconfu:lential and is for the exclusive use of the Oty of Chula Vista. As you know, our project has been under attaCk from "Brious groups, including the County of San Diego. We have tried and will continue OUT efforts to make Cainpo a part of the County Solid Waste Management System. Alternately, we are' prepared 10 begin contract discussions with Ihe City of Chula Vista at your earliest convenience. ' Thank you for the opportUnity to update you, on Campo. If I can answer any questions. please COlltact me. Sincerely, oherts ent - Landfill Operations R1RIsw cc: Chairman Goff, Campo Band John Goss, City Manager Bruce Boogaard, City Allomey o Pnnted 0'1 R(o:(;yr.led ?Hoer -23/9 .. .3.5 AN INVESTMENT IN THE FUTURE BOARD OF DIRECTORS President T Pat Cavanaugh President Elect Diane Flint Vice Presidents: Rod DavIs Mike Maslak Mary Anne SIre John F. Vugrrn Members: Patricia Barnos Russ Bullen Steve Collins Greg Cox Chuck Day Roben GarcIa Susan Herney Ca.1hi Jamison Chns Lewis Tim LewIs Norm Richins Bob Thcmas Jim Weaver Past President Mike Green Executive Director Donald R. Read CHULA VISTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE July 9, 1993 Honorable Mayor Tim Nader and City Council CITY OF CHULA VISTA 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 SUBJECT: SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENTS AND FEES The Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce has been informed that the subject issue is being added to the agenda as items 23 A and 23 B for the July 13th Council meeting. The Chamber request that no action be taken on this issue during the July 13th Council meeting in order to permit the business community to 'study and comment on this issue. County Supervisor Brian Bilbray and Councilman Jerry Rindone are scheduled to discuss this issue at the Chamber's Board of Directors meeting on Wednesday, July 14, 1993. Sincerely, CHULA VISTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ~ f. Pat Cavanaugh President TPC:gn cc: John Goss, City Mgr. ;23A --37 2 3 3 F 0 U R T H A V E N U E . C H U L A V 1ST A, C A l I FOR N I A 9 1 9 1 0 . TEL (6 1 9) 4 2 0 - 6 6 0 3 07/13/93 08:42 :818 482 7828 CITY OF LA IIESA Iiili 002/003 City of Ul Mesa. ART MADRID Mayo. . July 13, 1il93 Mayor and Members of the C"rty Co nciI. City of Chula. Vista 27!> Fourth Avenue Chuta'VIsta, CA 91910 Dear TIIll, Lsonard, Shirley, Jerry, Bob: Chula Vista has a history of being oJ18lY, a trend setter, enlghtenecf"aild a ponnsor of' .the good benchmar1c qualities that any.cities in lhe County ani Just beginning lD grasp. . .. It Is for th~se reasons ~~ I was sh eked and very disappointed when your city elected not to become a member of the newly-forrred Solid Waste Commission. During the past several months, I and some nine other elect;:d olIicials, including your own Len Moore, I~ested 60 . plus hours, not Including staff time, Iscussing every conceivable reason why'Wl' should or should not establish a commission r JPA to Jointly administer the exlsting County landfills and related trash flow Issues. . The conclusion was that while lhe were many potential unsavory asPects lD this 'Mill')iag~,' we all knew that we could no longe tolerate the inept ancI unprofessional mariner in which the County has been adminiStering the clld Waste Division and managing the IaJ;Jdfill sites. Unless we became part of the . we would continue to be' part of the problem. These negotiations were not easy. trampled on to get to the core of th The issue of a 'Commission' ve . decision to opt for a 'Commission' assume under a JPA. rd questions were asked, tempers flared, egos Wllre Issue(s) and consensus was agreed upon. I thought a JPA was thoroughly examined and It was our collective sa of the Inherent problems we would Immediately . " While we all knew that we would be giving 'advlc:e' to the County Board of Supervisors, lIS a Commission. we also knew that. in , it woUld be more than advice, It woUld amount to instructions or directives becaUse out us th&y WID perish, and vice versa. 11:Ie key for me . .Is that for the first time In all my dings with CoImty officials, going bal;k to 1963. I developed a level of confidence, d ed a genuine and sincere atlilude and relevance from . the County's representative, Pani 51 ler. She is the finchpln on this issue. . Ple8se don't m~ my comm~ts as idealistic, naive or pOnyana. . ~use of the , caliber of individuals siIling at the taflle, I thought that we were aR deafmg in good faith and the agreemenl$ Jo.intly developed re resented a "ConSensus' of Uieir felloW CounCllmembets. . It wasn't untO some of them went b lD their Cities that It became evident thai: .there had . been hidden agendas and for some, polllical games had been the order.!" the day. That . .' 8130 ALLISON AVENUE. P-O. BOX 03'7. LA cAuFORNIA 91944-093'7/(61'* -<<III. FAX ("19)'I02:~ ;J.J/J -3r 07/13/93 09:43 tt619 462 7628 CIIT OF LA lIEU IiiI 003/003 won't deter me though from worl<i with ~ lD reach COIlS8nsus on this Issue. The reluctance that some cities In joining the existing Commission is due to e. tolal distrust of the County who has in th past been grossly stupid and arrogant about their inablUty to manage these IancIfiD s. I shan:t these concems, but since no current viable alternative exists today, I wDI not aD w our City to continue to be vicIlmizad by ail agency with a proven track record of nor our resIdenls to be penaDzed by. an exe! sslve surcharge while waiting for some l' to be developed "rnil8Cle alleme.tfve" to occur. The current IandllD $/tes are our onl Comnisslon. La Mesa will now and I ~Ily ask for Chura Vi strength of seventeen former Inde tactics of the past will no longer most economic. environmentally _ dIolce today, that Is why we became.mlllTlbers of the . a voice In the fulure operations regarding trash disposal, to Join us by becoming a working partner. The coUecllve nt partners.and the Cotmy's reali2atlon that thefr bully Is the formula for a new afIlIlation that will give us the and manageable solid waste operation. There is a clean easel. The Commi ion will be selling the ground rules by which this COunty will hanclle cur solid waste disposal !leIS In the fulure. Sure, I mow that there are numerous issues lD resolve and IOU h decisions yet to be made, but I want our City to have a strong voice In part of that process, it's not advice that we will be giving. We need you, we need ead1 other .thoul reseMllion or conditions. Thank you for your favorable and positive response. Sincerely, ClJ( Mayor cc: R. SterlIng D. Wear S.Edcis >>//3; RESOLUTION NO. J 7 J t-~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT (AS AMENDED) BY, BETWEEN AND AMONG THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITIES OF THE COUNTY ESTABLISHING AN INTERIM SOLID WASTE COMMISSION AND PROVIDING FOR THE DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE, AND COMMITTING 50% OF THE CITY'S WASTESTREAM TO THE COUNTY WHEREAS, on 3/30/93, Council discussed regional solid waste issues and a proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement in a workshop which identified general concerns and directed staff to focus on key concerns and recommendations for modifying the Agreement; and WHEREAS, at the regular meeting of 4/20/93, Council again received updated information on specific concerns and suggested revisions, and provided input to Councilmember Moore in representing South Bay cities in renegotiating the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the SANDAG Board (sitting as the Integrated Waste Management Task Force) had established an Elected Officials steering Committee with the direction to negotiate a modified Participation Agreement acceptable to the entire Task Force; and WHEREAS, the new Agreement would then be distributed to all the cities and the County for action by the respective councils and the Board of Supervisors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Agreement (As Amended) by, between and among the County of San Diego and the cities of the County Establishing an Interim Solid Waste commission and Providing for the Disposal of Solid Waste, and Committing 50% of the City's Wastestream to the County, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista. Presented by Approved as to form by Stephanie Snyder, Principal Management Assistant Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney F:\home\attorney\SoIWaste.res ol:J13 -' /