HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1997/01/14
Tuesday, January 14, 1997
6:00 p.m.
"I declare IoInder penalty of perjury thet 1 am
employed by the City of Chu" VIS~S !n the
Office of the City Clerk and that : ',os, ed
this Agende/Notlce on the Bulleti" Board et
the Public Ices Building end et City Hili\- on
DATED I SIGNED
Re ular M Ii of the Cil of Ch
..
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, Salas _, and
Mayor Horton _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. MOMENT OF SILENCE
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
December 17, 1996 (City Council Meeting), December 17, 1996 (Joint
Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency), January 7, 1997
(City Council Meeting), and January 7, 1997 (Joint Meeting of the City
Council/Redevelopment Agency).
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Oath of Office: Virgil Pina - Human Relations Commission.
***......
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting.
Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However,
final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 8)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion. 1/ you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete
the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to
the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and
Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from observance of
actions taken in Closed Session on 1/7/97, that there were no reportable actions which are
required under the Brown Act to be reported. It is recommended that the letter be received
and filed.
b. Resignation from the Child Care Commission - Angie Gish. It is recommended that the
resignation be accepted with regret and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according
to the Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library.
Agenda
-2-
January 14, 1997
6.A. RESOLUTION 18549 REPROGRAMMING ffiGH INTENSITY DRUG TRAFFICKING AREA
(lDDTA) FUNDS AND TRANSFERRING SAID FUNDS FOR THE
PURCHASE OF AN UNDERCOVER VEffiCLE AND OFFICER SAFETY
EQUIPMENT - The Federal budget is adopted in October of each year, after
the City's budget has been approved by Council. As a result, initial grant
budgets are established based on preliminary information received from each
grant program. It is necessary to make several adjustments to reflect the actual
Federal appropriation for the High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA)
and Jurisdiction Unified for Drug/Gang Enforcement (JUDGE). Staff
recommends approval of the resolutions. (Chief of Police)
B. RESOLUTION 18550 ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $4,708 FROM JURISDICTIONS
UNIFIED FOR DRUG/GANG ENFORCEMENT (JUDGE) FOR JUDGE
PERSONNEL EXPENDITURES AND RELATED TRAVEL - 4/5th's vote
required.
7. RESOLUTION 18551 APPROVING EXPENDITURE FROM THE UNAPPROPRIATED ASSET
SEIZURE FUNDS AND APPROPRIATING $4,500 FROM SAID FUNDS
FOR PAYMENT OF FEES AND OUTFITTING COSTS ASSOCIATED
WITH THE RELEASE OF A REPLACEMENT ASSET SEIZURE
VEffiCLE - The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 provides for the
distribution of seized and forfeited assets to the agencies participating in the
investigation which resulted in the seizure. These funds are disbursed to
supplement the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police) 4/5th's vote required.
8. RESOLUTION 18552 AMENDING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SAN DIEGO GAS AND
ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PLACE ADDITIONAL GUY WIRE AND
ANCHOR WITHIN CITY'S MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE - San Diego Gas
and Electric Company (SDG&E) has requested an amendment to the easement
recently granted by the City to allow the installation of another guy wire to the
guy pole recently placed on the eastern edge of the golf course. SDG&E wishes
that, in lieu of granting an entire new easement, Council allow the existing
easement to be amended since the deed has not been recorded and the added
wires are part of the same project. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Public Works)
* * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * *
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the
Council'sjurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally
prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to
address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications
Fonn" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
Agenda
-3-
January 14, 1997
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to
speak to any item, please.fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete
the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per
individual.
9.
PUBLIC HEARING
A.
ORDINANCE 2695
B.
ORDINANCE 2696
10.
PUBLIC HEARING
ADOPTING OTAY RANCH PRE-ANNEXATIONS DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENTS WITH VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT AND BALDWIN
BUILDERS - On 6/25/96, the Planning Commission met jointly with Council
to consider and approve pre-annexation development agreements with the major
property owners of Otay Ranch. When the development agreements were
originally approved, it was anticipated that the Otay Ranch annexation would be
finalized by the end of 1996. The development agreements contained 12/31/96
expiration dates if the annexation was not complete by that time. While the
reorganization was ordered by Council on 12/17/96, a Local Agency Formation
Commission annexation condition was not met, the annexation was not
completed, and the agreements have expired. Staff recommends Council place
the ordinances on first reading. (Deputy City Manager Krempl and Special
Planning Projects Manager, Otay Ranch)
ADOPTING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED PRE-
ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH OTA Y RANCH,
L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSIllP, AND VILLAGE
DEVELOPMENT, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL PARTNERSIllP (first
readi",!)
ADOPTING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH PRE-
ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH BALDWIN
BUILDERS (first readi",!)
PCS-96-06 - CONSIDERATION OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
KNOWN AS VISTA DEL MAR, TRACT 96-06, IN ORDER TO
SUBDIVIDE 3.46 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST
QUADRANT OF DEL MAR A VENUE AND "C" STREET - DAN IRWIN -
The applicant, Dan Irwin, has submitted an application for a tentative
subdivision map known as Vista Del Mar in order to subdivide 3.46 acres
located on the westerly side of Del Mar A venue between Nixon Place and
Shirley Street into 15 single family detached lots in the R-I-7 zone. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 18553 APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP VISTA DEL MAR A VENUE, TRACT 96-06
Agenda
-4-
January 14, 1997
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by
the Council, staff. or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council
and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please
fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to five minutes.
11. RESOLUTION 18545 APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR $69,000 WITH MARTY CHASE FOR
UPDATING THE PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
(PFDlF) PROGRAM AND THE RELATED FIRE FACILITIES MASTER
PLAN (PS-147) AND APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS
THEREFOR - The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee program
provides for the funding required to construct needed public facilities and
prevent existing residents from subsidizing the City's capital costs to serve new
development. In order to properly reflect changes in the City's facility needs
and their respective costs since the last update, it is proposed that the City enter
into a contract to update both the Public Facilities DIF and the related Fire
Facilities Master Plan. The timing of this update is intended to incorporate the
Otay Ranch annexation area into the DIF prior to issuance of any building
permits. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager
KrempI) 4/5th's vote required. Continued from the meeting of 1/7/97.
12. RESOLUTION 18543 ADOPTING THE SITING ELEMENT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN - The County of San Diego
Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan consists of the County-wide Summary
Plan and Siting Elements. The Summary Plan outlines the Source Reduction,
Reuse, Recycling, Composting Plans and Waste Generation Estimates for all
jurisdictions within the County and was approved by Council on 1/7/97. The
Siting Element is intended to identify the disposal capacity needed by
jurisdictions within the County for a 15 year period. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Conservation Coordinator) Continued from the meeting
of 1/7/97.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers.
Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
13. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
Agenda
-5-
January 14, 1997
14. MAYOR'S REPORTIS)
a. Ratification of appointments - Economic Development Commission - Christopher H. Lewis; and
Youth Commission - Andrea L. Hunter.
15. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the regular City Council meeting on January 21, 1997
at 6:00 p.m. in tbe City Council Cbambers.
"I declare wnder penalty of perjury thet 1 am
employed by the City of Chu!a Viata in the
Office of the City Clerk and tha~ I posted
Tuesday, January 14, 1997 this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. . . the pUbli~r~es Buildi'1g ~ Cit~PoWiC Services Building
(Immediately followmg the City CouncR'M~hg t:! '7 SIGNED - ~ ,.....-'..
/
Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council
CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are pennitted by law to be the subject of a closed
session discussion, and which the Coundl is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the
interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of final action
taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed
sessions, the videotaping will be tenninated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from
closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING - Existing litigation pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9
. Claim of Bonita Bryant.
. Claim of Amy Wolfe.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE RELEASE - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
2. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
;;/rd:~
r-
January 9, 1997
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council (j
John D. Goss, City Manager ^J ~ ~1Q ~~11
City Council Meeting of January 14, 1997
TO:
SUBJECT:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of
Tuesday, January 14, 1997. Comments regarding the Written Communications are as follows:
Sa. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in Closed Session on January 7, 1997, there were no
reportable actions which are required to be reported under the Brown Act.
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED.
Sb. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ANGIE GISH'S RESIGNATION FROM THE CHILD
CARE COMMISSION BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CITY CLERK BE
DIRECTED TO POST IMMEDIATELY ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN
THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LlliRARY.
JDG:mab
~~f?
~:-:
.......~Z-~
~-- - -
~~---
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date:
January 8, 1997
The Honorable Mayor and Citiy cou;~i7~~-
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
Report Regarding Actions Ta en in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 1/7/97
To:
From:
Re:
The City Council met in Closed Session to discuss Chaparral Greens
v. City of Chula Vista.
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City
Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which
are required under the Brown Act to be reported.
JMK:lgk
C:\lt\clossess.no
...--.
-!:J a.. - /
276 FOURTH AVENUE. CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910 . (619) 691-5037 . FAX (619) 585-5612
lh'Pos1~Ao:io;.)dOOP~
101~
RECEIVED
'96 tIC 20 AJU>7
"',"','
'~~~,,:.."\<~,
W.WPfU
Dear Bob.r1is and fellow Child Care Commisswners ;
-
I)~e~ber 16, 1996
It'is Witndeep regret that I hereby resign my position as Vice-Chair
of the Chula Vista Child Care CotntnisSion effective January 1, 1997.
Due to my current employment location and hours I feel I am unable
to properly fulfill my responsibilities and obligatons to the,commissj,o,n.
I t~you for the opportunity I had to serve our c~wUty.
Developing the Child (:are Element was very rewarding..1 kqowthe Child
Care Commission will continue to provide the City of Chula Vista with
insight to the needs of the children in our city.
Sincerely,
Angie Gish
.' .."'> ~'. ,"'''11 ~., ~ 1\1""
'" I" ,!t\1'! ~~'..'r' I,. '.' ....c;"',"'~
.J? .r- ~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item &
Meeting Date 01114/97
ITEM TITLE
It.
Resolution / g' 5'i t Reprogramming High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDT A) funds and transferring said funds for
the purchase of an undercover vehicle and officer safety
equipment.
Resolution /!fW Accepting and Appropriating $4,708 from
Jurisdictions Unified for Drug/Gang Enforcement (JUDGE) for
JUDGE personnel expenditures and related travel.
8.
SUBMITTED BY
(!
Police Chief V<.V ~
City Manager JG, \1\ 0: J (4/5ths Vote: Yes..K.No_)
REVIEWED BY
The Federal budget is adopted in October of each year, after the City's budget has been
approved by Council. As a result initial grant budgets are established based on preliminary
information received from each grant program. The purpose of this agenda statement is to make
several adjustments necessary to reflect the actual Federal appropriation for the High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) and the Jurisdiction Unified for Drug/Gang Enforcement
(JUDGE) grant programs.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Approve reprogramming of HIDT A funds and expenditure of such funds for the purchase
of one undercover vehicle and police officer safety equipment; and
2) Accept and appropriate $4,708 in JUDGE funds for JUDGE personnel benefits and
related travel.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
~-/
Paee 2 Item
Meeting Date 01/14/97
DISCUSSION:
HIDTA GRANT BUDGET
San Diego and Imperial counties have been designated as High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas
(HIDTA). As a result the United States Attorney's Office established the California Border
Alliance Group (CBAG) to develop multi-jurisdictional cooperative strategies to deal with drug
trafficking activities. CBAG established a HIDTA funded Marine Air Group with the sole
responsibility for interdiction of narcotics via air and sea along the southwest border region.
Due to the effectiveness of operation "Gatekeeper," it is believed that smugglers are utilizing
shipping lanes resulting in a need for interdiction via air and sea along the southwest border.
The Police Department currently has one Agent position assigned to HIDTA Marine Air Group.
The HIDTA grant reimburses the City for salary & benefit (including overtime) expenditures
associated with the assigned position.
Council appropriated $65,000 in January 1996 for a full-time Agent position assigned to HIDTA
Marine Air Group and funded by HIDTA funds. Due to a delay in HIDTA's formation of the
Marine Air Group, this position was filled in July 1996 resulting in a HIDTA savings of
$22,900. These funds were "carried over" from the FY 95-96 budget to the FY 96-97 budget
and reprogrammed by HIDTA for purchase of an undercover vehicle ($14,400) and officer
safety equipment ($8,500). Reprogramming will allow the City to utilize previous year HIDTA
funds that would have otherwise be returned to the federal budget.
The vehicle will be used for undercover operations related to HIDTA. The allocation of $8,500
will be used to purchase: Ballistic Body Armor ($467), Raid Body Armor ($650), Holster-belt
($160) and Body Wire ($7,200) for the Agent assigned to the Marine Air Group position.
Therefore, the HIDTA budget needs to be amended in the following manner:
ACCOUNT /DESC. ORIGINAL AMENDED DIFFERENCE
100-1094 HIDTA GRANT BUDGET (1996 BUDGET After
Allocation) Reprogramming)
5101 Salary $ 45,000 $ 26,100 -$ 18,900
5141 - 5144 Benefits $ 12,000 $ 8,500 -$ 3,500
5103 Overtime $ 8,000 $ 7,500 -$ 500
5565 Auto. Equipment $ 0 $ 14,400 +$ 14,400
5568 Other Equipment $ 0 $ 8,500 +$ 8,500
TOTAL $ 65,000 $ 65,000 N/A
If Council does not approve reprogramming, the funds will be returned to the federal budget.
?-~
Pa\1:e 3 Item
Meeting Date 01114/97
JUDGE GRANT BUDGET
Currently, the Police Department has two officers assigned to JUDGE. This is a countywide
interagency team which responds to problems concerning adult and juvenile probationers and
gang members habitually involved in drug offenses. The goal of the unit is to ensure
prosecution of arrested JUDGE targets, resulting in maximum incarceration of the offenders.
The JUDGE officers also assist the Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET) and the Gang
Enforcement Units, and act as a liaison between the Probation Department and the Police
Department. The JUDGE grant budget reimburses the City for 75 % of the Salary & Benefits
(including travel) associated with the two officers assigned.
At the time the JUDGE Grant budget of $102,681 was appropriated the Police Department
budget was still waiting for a final budget from the District Attorney's Office. Since then the
Police department has received a final budget of $107,389 from the District Attorney's Office.
The total budget includes $105,625 for personnel services and $1,764 for travel for two persons
to attend the California Narcotics Officer Convention held in Anaheim earlier this fiscal year.
As a result the JUDGE budget needs to be amended and the additional $4,708 needs to be
appropriated in the following manner:
ACCOUNT/DESC. ORIGINAL AMENDED DIFFERENCE
100-1095 JUDGE GRANT BUDGET BUDGET
5102 Differential wiPers $ 0 $ 1,600 +$ 1,600
5103 Overtime wlo Pers $ 0 $ 1,418 + 1,418
5131 Sick-Leave Pay in Lieu $ 0 $ 386 + 386
5221 Travel $ 460 $ 1,764 + 1,304
TOTAL $ 460 $ 5,168 + 4,708
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City receives full reimbursement for the position assigned to Marine Air Group ($65,000)
and 75% reimbursement for the two positions assigned to JUDGE ($105,625). The net fiscal
impact to the General Fund is $25,591. Approval of staff's recommendations would add an
additional $22,900 from reprogramming of H1DTA funds for a vehicle and officer safety
equipment and add $4,708 to offset benefit and travel expenditures associated with the positions
assigned to JUDGE. Combined these budget changes add $27,608 in grant reimbursement to
the General Fund and reduce the net fiscal impact of the JUDGE positions to the General Fund.
&'-3
RESOLUTION NO. / ?f3119
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA REPROGRAMMING HIGH INTENSITY DRUG
TRAFFICKING AREA (HIDTA) FUNDS AND TRANS-
FERRING SAID FUNDS FOR THE PURCHASE OF AN
UNDERCOVER VEHICLE AND OFFICER SAFETY
EQUIPMENT
WHEREAS, the Federal budget is adopted in October of each
year, after the City's budget has been approved by Council; and
WHEREAS, as a result initial grant budgets are
established based on preliminary information received from each
grant program; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to make several adjustments to
reflect the actual Federal appropriation for the High Intensity
Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA); and
WHEREAS, Council appropriated $65,000 in January 1996 for
a full-time Agent position assigned to HIDTA Marine Air Group and
funded by HIDTA funds; and
WHEREAS, this position was filled in July 1996 resulting
in a HIDTA savings of $22,900; and
WHEREAS, as a result the remaining 1996 funds were
reprogrammed by HIDTA for purchase of an undercover vehicle
($14,000) and officer safety equipment ($8,500) which vehicle will
be used for undercover operations related to HIDTA; sand
WHEREAS, the allocation of $8,500 will be used to
purchase: Ballistic Body Armor ($467), Raid Body Armor ($650),
Holster-belt ($160) and Body Wire ($7,200) for the Agent assigned
to the Marine Air Group position.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby reprogram High Intensity Drug
Trafficking Area (HIDTA) funds and transfer said funds for the
purchase of an undercover vehicle and officer safety equipment as
follows:
1
t /7-/
ACCOUIIT/DESC. AMENDED
100-1094 BIDTA ORIGINAL BUDGET
GRANT BUDGET (1996 AFTER REPRO- DIFFERENCE
GRAMMING)
5101 Salary $45,000 $26,100 -$18,900
5141-5144 $12,000 $ 8,500 -$ 3,500
Benefits
5103 Overtime $ 8,000 $ 7,500 -$ 50C
5565 Auto $ 0 $14,400 +$14,400
Equipment
5568 Other $ 0 $ 8,500 +$ 8,500
Equipment
TOTAL $65,000 $65,000 N/A
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/f( /c::-
Kaheny, cit
ttorney
Richard P. Emerson, Police
Chief
2
tbA' c:z
RESOLUTION NO. /~~~C?
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $4,708
FROM JURISDICTIONS UNIFIED FOR DRUG/GANG
ENFORCEMENT (JUDGE) FOR JUDGE PERSONNEL
EXPENDITURES AND RELATED TRAVEL
WHEREAS, at the time the JUDGE grant budget of $102,681
was appropriated, the Police Department budget was still waiting
for a final budget from the District Attorney's office; and
WHEREAS, since then the Police Department has received a
final budget of $107,389 from the District Attorney's office; and
WHEREAS, the total budget includes $105,625 for Personal
Services and $1,764 for travel for two persons to attend the
California Narcotics Officers Convention held in Anaheim earlier
this fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, as a result the JUDGE budget needs to be amended
and the additional $4,708 needs to be appropriated as set forth
below.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby accept and appropriate $4,708 from
Jurisdictions Unified for Drug/Gang Enforcement (JUDGE) for JUDGE
personnel expenditures as follows:
ACCOUNT/DESC. AMENDED BUDGET
100-1095 JUDGE ORIGINAL AFTER REPRO-
GRANT BUDGET GRAMMING DIFFERENCE
5102-Differential $0 $1,600 +$1,600
wiPers
5103 Overtime w/o $0 $1,418 +$1,418
Pers
5131 sick Leave Pay $0 $ 386 +$ 386
in Lieu
5221 Travel $460 $1,764 +$1,304
TOTAL $460 $5,168 +4,708
Presented by
Approved as to form by
torney
Richard P. Emerson, Police
Chief
C:\rs\hidta.1
iP8 - /
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item --2-
Meeting Date 01/14/97
ITEM TITLE
Resolution /3'.5"5,{pproving expenditure from the
unappropriated Asset Seizure Funds and Appropriating $4,500
from said funds for payment of fees and outfitting costs associated
with the release of a replacement asset seizure vehicle.
SUBMITTED BY
...
Police Chief ~
~~\
c'
~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes..x.No_)
REVIEWED BY
City ManagerJ[\ \/yJ
The Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 provides for the distribution of seized and
forfeited assets to the agencies participating in the investigation which resulted in the seizure.
These funds are disbursed to supplement the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies.
RECOMMENDATION: Approve expenditure from unappropriated Asset Seizure Funds and
appropriate $4,500 from said funds for payment of fees associated with the release of an asset
seizure vehicle and associated outfitting costs.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
BACKGROUND:
On October 12, 1984, the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984 was signed into law. As
a result of this law any state or local law enforcement agency that directly participates in an
investigation or prosecution that results in a federal forfeiture may request an equitable share of
the net proceeds of the forfeiture. The primary purpose of the forfeiture program is to deter
crime by depriving criminals of the profits and proceeds of their illegal activities and therefore
weaken criminal enterprises. Most equitable sharing is the result of federal, state and local law
enforcement joint investigations. The use of the funds collected are subject to federal
regulations. As a result the City has an Asset Forfeiture (Seizure) Account to track and collect
the funds received from the distribution of federally seized and forfeited assets. These funds
may be used for purchase of equipment and certain law enforcement activities such as the
staffing costs of Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET). Funds collected from asset seizure
activity vary annually.
7-/
Page 2 Item
Meeting Date 01114/97
DISCUSSION:
Fund 218, the Asset Seizure Program, partially funds the Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET)
of the Police Department's Investigative Division (100/1050). Additionally, Fund 218 includes
$4,588 from the sale of three asset seizure vehicles earlier this year. These vehicles were
beyond economic repair and sold at auction. Staff expects Fund 218 to exceed the revenue
projection of $101,000 for FY 96-97. This projection is based on a total of $100,192 (includes
interest income & sale proceeds) which has been collected as of December 25, 1996.
The Police Department proposes to use a portion of the proceeds ($4,500) from the sale of
vehicles to purchase an asset seizure vehicle. The vehicle will be purchased from United States
Marshals Office and transferred to the City. Forfeiture of the vehicle was a result of a joint
investigation (Log 529) conducted by the City and the Marshals Office. Pursuant to equitable
sharing guidelines, the Police Department has the option of purchasing the vehicle by paying the
Marshals Office for their federal share and associated storage fees. The total payment due to
the Marshals Office is an estimated $3,001, this amount includes $526 for storage fees. The
remaining funds $1,499 will be used to outfit the vehicle for undercover use. Because the
vehicle will be used in police undercover operations, the make and model or other details about
the vehicle are not disclosed in this agenda statement. The Police Department and the Fleet
Manager have inspected the vehicle and recommend purchase of the vehicle. The vehicle is in
excellent condition and has an estimated net worth value of $17,700. In the event the vehicle
is not purchased by the Police Department, the vehicle will be sold at auction and the net sale
proceeds will be distributed equitably among the Marshals Office and the City.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Asset seizure funds are used to partially offset the Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET). Staff
anticipates revenues from asset seizure funds will exceed the revenue projection of $101,000 for
FY 96-97. As of December 25, 1996 $100,193 has been collected. Staff anticipates revenue
projections to be exceeded by an estimated $50,000. These revenues may be used to offset
NET costs or purchase of police equipment. As a result staff is recommending $4,500 (from
the sale proceeds) be appropriated from Fund 218 Asset Seizure Program to account 100-1050-
5568 to pay for the costs associated with the asset seizure vehicle to be purchased. This vehicle
replaces an asset seizure vehicle sold at auction earlier this fiscal year. As a result maintenance
costs are included in the current police budget.
7-.2
RESOLUTION NO. /'655/
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING EXPENDITURE FROM THE
UNAPPROPRIATED ASSET SEIZURE FUNDS AND
APPROPRIATING $4,500 FROM SAID FUNDS FOR
PAYMENT OF FEES AND OUTFITTING COSTS
ASSOCIATED WITH THE RELEASE OF A REPLACEMENT
ASSET SEIZURE VEHICLE
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Crime Control Act of 1984
provides for the distribution of seized and forfeited assets to the
agencies participating in the investigation which resulted in the
seizure; and
WHEREAS, these funds are disbursed to supplement the
effectiveness of law enforcement agencies; and
WHEREAS, Fund 218, the Asset Seizure Program, partially
funds the Narcotics Enforcement Team (NET) of the Police
Department's Investigative Division (100/1050); and
WHEREAS, Fund 218 also includes $4,588 from the sale of
three asset seizure vehicles earlier this year, which vehicles were
beyond economic repair and sold at auction; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department proposes to use a portion
of the proceeds from the sale of vehicles ($4,500) to purchase an
asset seizure vehicle from the U. S. Marshal's office and pay for
associated storage fees and outfitting costs; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department and the Fleet Manager have
inspected the vehicle and recommend purchase of the vehicle which
has an estimated net worth value of $17,700.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
ci ty of Chula vista does hereby approve expenditure from the
unappropriated Asset Seizure Funds and appropriate $4,500 to
Account 100-1050-5568 for payment of costs associated with the
release of a replacement asset seizure vehicle.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Richard P. Emerson, Police
Chief
AtC/
c: \rs\asset
7~J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
0-
1/14/97
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution / %...?~~mending grant of easement to San Diego Gas And
Electric Company to place additional guy wire and anchor within City's Municipal
Golf Course
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public works/
Director of Parks and Recreati~ f 0';
City Manager ~(~ tu 8:~~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No..xJ
REVIEWED BY:
San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) has requested an amendment to the easement recently
granted by the City to allow the installation of another guy wire to the guy pole recently placed on the
eastern edge of the golf course. SDG&E wishes that, in lieu of granting an entire new easement, that the
City Council allow the existing easement to be amended, since the deed has not been recorded and the
added wires are part of the same project. The City Council must authorize the amendment to the grant
of the easement by adoption of a resolution amending the original easement.
RECOMMENDATION: The Council adopt the subject resolution amending the easement to San Diego
Gas and Electric Company and direct the City Clerk to return the original, signed document to SDG&E.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: No action by City Boards or Commissions is
necessary in this matter.
DISCUSSION: The County of San Diego is in the process of reconstructing the intersection of Bonita
Road and Central A venue. As part of this project, SDG&E must relocate several power poles and the
associated overhead electrical lines in the area. This alteration necessitated placing a pole and anchor wire
in the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course property. The Council granted an easement for those facilities
by Resolution No. 18365 at its meeting of July 16, 1996. The original easement is indicated as "Exist.
Easement" on Exhibit "A", attached.
As the reconstruction project proceeded, it was discovered that a guy pole located at the southwest corner
of the intersection of Central Avenue and Bonita Road needed to be removed. This guy pole was
contributing to the support of a power pole across Central A venue, on the northwest corner. In order to
sustain that support, SDG&E is proposing to use the newly-installed guy pole within the original easement
mentioned above. The new guy wire will be placed over and to the westerly side of the jogging trail,
approximately 28 feet above the ground and will not interfere with golfmg activities or those persons using
the jogging trail.
'it~ /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 1/14/97
The new guy wire running from the north necessitates additional support for the existing guy pole. This
support will be in the form of a wire extending 25 feet south of the pole with a ground anchor.
The added easement for these facilities is proposed to be four feet wide by approximately 225 feet long.
SDG&E prefers to amend the existing easement to include the new facilities, in lieu of granting a separate
easement. The reasoning is that it is all part of the same project and the wires are connecting to a guy pole
which is located within the existing easement. The easement granted by Council last July still has not been
recorded, so may simply be amended prior to recordation.
nSCAL IMPACT: All costs of the work being done on City property are being paid by SDG&E. Staff
is not charging, nor has it historically charged a fee for processing easements for public utilities.
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Locator plat
Resolution
Easement deed
[M:IHOMElENGlNEERIAGENDAISDGEESMT.JWH]
Engineering File No: 0490-60-PF-245
;?r2
RESOLUTION NO. /~~~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING GRANT OF EASEMENT TO SAN
DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PLACE
ADDITIONAL GUY WIRE AND ANCHOR WITHIN CITY'S
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
WHEREAS, San Diego Gas and Electric Company (SDG&E) has
requested an amendment to the easement recently granted by the City
to allow the installation of another guy wire to the guy pole
recently placed on the eastern edge of the golf course; and
WHEREAS, SDG&E wishes that, in lieu of granting an entire
new easement, that the City Council allow the existing easement to
be amended, since the deed has not been recorded and the added
wires are part of the same project; and
WHEREAS, the city Council must authorize the amendment to
the grant of the easement by adoption of a resolution amending the
original easement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby amend the grant of easement to San
Diego Gas and Electric Company to place additional guy wire and
anchor within City's Municipal Golf Course.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is directed to
return the signed document to SDG&E.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/
k~~
torney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
C:\rs\sdge.guy
8<3
OWN BY:
C\
~
~
~
PIJLE NUDIIJG
St/PI'OIi?T __
- - - .-
() e.
6 rJ
p...J
~ New GUY WII2E
, / C;U'I POLE.
.:'-r Bt:.11>/6 1i?E.l4ovEtJ
/At,..
112-
6 rJ
~
tvt:.N EASEMENT
BEING GRAN/cO
"1:.
t-
--
":<
~
tQ
EX/ST. PIJL.E
E;05i. EAScMEI./T
DATE: /1/20/9(,.
EXI-I/8/ T itA"
g~f
~
NO SGALE
FILE NO. PF- Z49
Recording Requested by
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
When recorded, mail to:
San Diego Gas & Electric Company
P.O. Box 1831
San Diego, CA 92112
Attn: Office Services, EB 5
?a:
SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER'S USE:::
Project No.:
Const. No.:
APN No.:
604149-040
2546642
593-240-24
,.
Transfer Tax NQm;
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
EASEMENT
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MlJNICIPAL CORPORATIONhereinafter called
"Grantor", grants to SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRlC COMPANY, a corporation, hereinafter called
"Grantee", an easement and right of way to erect, construct, change the size of, improve, reconstruct,
relocate, repair, maintain and use facilities consisting of: Guy poles and/or anchors together with
connecting wires to support that certain pole line located upon or adjacent to Grantor's land, together
with the right of ingress thereto and egress therefrom over said easement and over other practical routes
across Grantor's land situated in the County of San Diego, State of California.
That portion of Quarter Section 47 of Rancho De La Nacion, according to Map thereof
No. 166 filed in the office of the County Recorder of said County of San Diego; described in a Deed
recorded January 15,1974 at Recorder's File/Page No. 19905 ofOfficiaJ Records of said County of San
Diego.
The said easement in the aforesaid land shall be 4.00 feet in width, the centerline of
which shall be the centerline of the facilities as installed on Grantor's property, the approximate location
being shown and delineated on the Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof.
Grantor will exercise only such reserved rights in said land as will not interfere with or
prohibit the free and complete use and enjoyment by Grantee, its' successor or assigns, of the rights
hereby granted. Grantee shall have the right to top, cut, remove, or trim interfering plants and trees, and
to keep said easement free from and to prevent any person, including Grantor and successors and assigns,
from erecting, placing, or storing on said easement any flammable or other hazards and any structures,
objects, or earth fills/cuts or other obstructions, except walls and fences.
H:\R\D6.dol..BAJ
!f/53?~
g/S'
<D
en
,
..:; =-.
~:; -..
'-
c::
.-
:-; c' -
~:l-rt ~;,
'q (") n
J:} T pl
?E~
i~l ~~
"'O.(n
-;-
l'
o
N
N
The legal description for this easement was prepared by San Diego Gas & Electric
Company pursuant to Section 8730 of the Business and Professions Code, SUlte of California.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, A MlJNICIP AL
CORPORATION
By JI~. /~
By
,.
Prepared by H iI
Date /09/96
State of California )
County of San Diego)
On , before me, ' Notary Public, personally appeared
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the
person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey
executed the same in hislherltheir authorized capacity(ies), and that by hislher/their signature(s) on the
instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
H:\R\D6.dol..BAJ
g-/?/%-7
CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKOWLEDGEMENT
State of California
County of San Diego
On ~/""O /fo before me, Beverlv A. Authelet, Citv Clerk
perSOnallyap:eared Sfi~}-'r WiJ./-1;'Mo
lflpersonallv known to me - OR - Dproved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to
be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to
the within instrument and acknowledged to me that
he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their
authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the
entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted,
executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
\fZJfiJ u. P:::A~l
OPTIONAL
Though the data below is not required by law, it may prove valuable to persons re,lying on the doculTient and
could prevent fraudulent reattachment of this form, .
CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER
DESCRIPTION OF ATTACHED DOCUMENT
o Individual
~ Corporate Officer
fJ!ao~SJ
!il WNlu.i:.- / S D6.1---
Titl~ or Type of Document
o
Partners(s) 0 limited
o General
Attorney-in-Fact
Trustee!s)
Guardian/Conservator
Other:
.3
Number of Pages
o
o
o
o
;~ !(~~ument
SIGNER IS REPRESENTING:
Na7f4erS3(SJ o(ll")~ d4,
Signer!s) Other Than Named Above
z-~
N
/
/
""
/
v
<\..1'<
~"'
c.<t.
,
"
/
/
/'
l,
C"F7Y of" O!c/IA 0-174
40/ 1- 15-7:1 ~- 1 J.9cJ5
CoOL F
LOUQ?L
7\2c)"(,,,-( i)
IV E. u.)
STuB, rol.-~
wlaSi"TAL) "-
~
;:
':::/1 t':=-"j-,),- A,,-/1
L-/1JLJJ1t:;:?ij/ ~C7-f'"
~
8
~
e
;:
~
,
c
~
C
.
"
EX~f I B!T "Art
S'i~:G 7 f
nt\ S S t\{)l1)S, ^-DCll'1-,O"O C) r- POLES
f\ ~ fL '\CO A \J -:r;-ry\ 'P ~() L)~ 1\\..60 T.
)
\
""
\>0
I c
~
f ~ ' i:!:
f-
-
2'.
~ G
z CJ
-
oJ
.9
D
'1
...
;
t!:
~
2(>{[
.
/
/'
N~W oLD'-:
) ? ":dd.CJ U
l-!:(
_ 'Vole
1q,5iiS
\: ~\S. IS.
G.u'i w\ ILtDlUL:
... f'tv?Qux.
d'\ i"- T \\ :::'()J~ I
~ 0 ~
I
il~
~~
.
m
-
m
n
o~
~~
::0
Cn
p~
~~
~~
m~
on
~~
~5
5Z
Z 0
,,~
~
~
n
o
z
V>
-<
"
c:
n
-<
15
z
o
"
o
m
"
Z
P
~
"
~
"
m
<
11
'\1
t\"~ ...J.~nL t:
1)
L':
~
L;
/
/ -<;..J. ,,'~
~ '"'
e-'i:..
~ .111
/J of c,Hd{) VIJI
Ctlr c'L
liCtf. /~ 15~ 1,1 N I J /0:.;,
,41J/J I TI tJrJtt.
C4JE;U', ~.I-
4-REA- c-Nf
f,"\
l1
~
"
[)
)'
1
,
.,
"
:1 ::lClljll~
I / I I
I
!
( I
c I
c.'
0
~ I
-"
I
...; I
;>
! I J
I I fJ I
I n
c'
0
~-~~
. .00&
\' 0"t'
'1)
OJ
"
-"
::;
,.
F
~
(>
o
~
()!. .
~ .
.,;_ lI>.. .~
In - .~. :..:.
...!..' r. t' ~
- :'.,J Vi-.
"l; c' ~ r:
Sir I
i
"
oj <J
Va ~
== 1).1
. ..c'
#G
~
n
[OJ
L
,.
L.
. -,
. - /' I
uf!:' .
.~-; i I
I. . '7
'~ r r
I
1
(;
I
I
-,
UH I B IT '"i~
511eer Z R~,
L'
u
1<
:;
"
j;
!.I
r:
,<
.
-1
'"
?~1 ~
:,
d'
".; r
_ '>-;..' -;.. !,\ I r
"Q o;-,iC) I.
<:~,: .~~,:~€,".' ~:;'O":',,~~~;:;;;~;~". o,~~~o:, :./.;;,
.. '.' :;>'J'''.'3'fH' J''''J::I''3J~
D()t;".'r,,~;90S
i
I
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No.
Meeting date: January 14. 1997
SUBMITTED BY:
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Adopting Otay Ranch Pre-annexation Agreements with
Village Development and Baldwin Builders
/1. Ordinance.:! k 5'3" Adopting a second amendment to the Restated
Pre-annexation Agreement with Otay Ranch L.P., a California limited
partnership, Village Development, a California general partnership and
the City of Chula Vista
f!, Ordinance :<.t- 7,? Adopting a first amendment to the Otay Ranch
Pre-annexation Agreement with Baldwin Builders and the City of Chula
Vista
Deputy City Manager W
Planning Director
Special Planning Projects Maf\ger, Otay Ranc
City Manager J(i b;J /l~i (4/5ths Vote: Yes _No...xJ
..-/
REVIEWED BY:
On June 25, 1996, the City Council met jointly with the Planning Commission to consider and
approve pre-annaexation development agreements with the major property owners of the Otay
Ranch. When the development agreements were originally approved, it was anticipated that the
Otay Ranch annexation would be finalized by the end of 1996. The development agreements
contained December 31, 1996 expiration dates if the annexation was not complete by that time.
While the reorganization was ordered by the City Council on December 17, 1996, a Local
Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) annexation condition was not met and the
annexation was not completed by December 3 I s1. The agreements have expired. The
agreements with Village Development and Baldwin Builders need to be reinstated to provide
the City with the bonding protection covered in the October development agreement
amendments. The agreements provided Village Development commitment to the GDP and
SPA One approvals. The revised agreements remove that expiration provision and make the
development agreements effective upon completion of the annexation.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the revised ordinances for Village
Development and Baldwin Builders Development Agreements.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission reviewed the Agreements at their January 8, 1997 meeting and
voted 4-0-1 with two members absent to recommend approval of the amendments.
9//
Page 2, Item _
Meeting Date: January 14. 1997
DISCUSSION:
In July of 1996, LAFCO authorized the City Council to conduct the proceeding to annex the
Otay Ranch Reorganization NO.1 to the City. LAFCO required that, prior to the completion
of the proceedings, the County of San Diego notity the City that it had received acceptable
landfill nuisance easements for the 1,000-foot buffer around the Otay landfill. SNMB has had
internal difficulty providing the County with acceptable easements but seem to be making
progress toward resolving those difficulties. In anticipation of the County receiving the
easements and the City the notice, staff scheduled the required City Council public hearing on
the reorganization for December 17, 1996.
At the December 17th meeting, the City Council held the hearing, did not receive any property
owner protest and adopted the resolution ordering the reorganization. The Council ordered the
reorganization with a condition that the County notice be received by the City prior to staff
filing the resolution with LAFCO. Once the notice is received, the City will file the ordering
resolution will LAFCO who will record it with the San Diego County Recorder completing the
annexation process.
The previous development agreements expired on December 31 st and need to be reinstated in
order for Village Development to proceed with the Final Maps in SPA One. The City does not
have authority to record Final Maps until the Reorganization proceedings are completed and
the property is annexed to the City. The expiration provisions have been removed trom the
revised agreements. These agreements are proposed to become effective upon completion of
the annexation to the City. A termination date ofJuly 1,1997 is included, unless the annexation
is extended by LAFCO, as a date by which the annexation shall occur or the development
agreements become null and void.
Note: The signatures required on the landfill nuisance easements by Mr. Alex Harper and the
Foundation have now been obtained. The County is in the process of obtaining subordination
agreements regarding the nuisance easement from Village Development and SNMB Ltd. (as
they pertain to property lienholders). Once this is completed, the annexation can be finalized
and recorded by LAFCO.
FISCAL IMPACT: The processing of the development agreements is covered under the
existing staffing agreement with Village Development. As of January 8, 1997, Village
Development's accounts with the City were delinquent by $83,235.87. October's invoice for
$58,504.16 was due on November 11,1996 and November's invoice of $24,731.71 was due
on December 24, 1996. Staff recommends the Council conduct the public hearing and place
the ordinances for first reading since the agreements provide necessary protection and
guarantees to the City. Village Development expects to be current in their payments by the end
of the month. There are other pending actions the City can hold in abeyance should payment
not be received.
Otaymch\finalmap\A113DADOC
~/;2
ORDINANCE NO.
:J&~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED
PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH OTAY
RANCH, L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,
AND VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, A CALIFORNIA GENERAL
PARTNERSHIP
WHEREAS, on June 25, 1996, the City Council approved a
Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Otay
Ranch, L.P., a California partnership, et al pursuant to Ordinance
No. 2679; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 1996, the City Council approved
an Amendment to the Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City of
Chula Vista and Otay Ranch, L.P., a California partnership, et al
and restated said Agreement pursuant to Ordinance No. 2691 (herein
referred to as "Restated Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, there is now a mutual desire by the City and
Otay Ranch to amend the Restated Agreement to extend the term of
the effective date ("Second Amendment") of said Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 1997, the Planning Commission
reviewed the Second Amendment to the Restated Pre-Annexation
Development Agreement and voted to approve the Second Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula
vista ordains as follows:
SECTION I: The Restated Agreement between Otay Ranch,
L.P., a California limited partnership, Village Development, a
California general partnership, and the City of Chula Vista is
hereby amended as set forth in the Second Amendment to the Restated
Pre-Annexation Development Agreement on file in the office of the
City Clerk as Document No.
SECTION II: The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is
hereby authorized and directed to execute said Second Amendment for
and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
SECTION III: This ordinance shall take
full force on the effective date of annexation as
attached Second Amendment to the Restated
Development Agreement.
effect and be of
set forth in the
Pre-Annexation
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~ -r1Jt~~
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
C:\or\village.2nd
9/J~ /
---
SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE RESTATED PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND THE OTAY RANCH AND VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT
This Second Amendment is entered into this day of ,
199_, by and between the city of Chula vista ("City"), a municipal
corporation and The Otay Ranch, L. P., a California limited
partnership, and Village Development, a California general
partnership (referred to herein collectively as "Developer").
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on June 25, 1996, the city Council approved a
Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City and Developer, pursuant
to Ordinance No. 2679; and
WHEREAS, on November 26, 1996, the city Council approved
an amendment to the Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City of
Chula vista and Developer and restated said Agreement, pursuant to
Ordinance No. 2691 (herein referred to as "Restated Agreement");
and
WHEREAS, there is now a mutual desire by the City and
Developer to amend the Restated Agreement to extend the term of the
effective date ("Second Amendment") of said Restated Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on January 8, 1997, the Planning commission
reviewed the Second Amendment to the Restated Agreement and voted
to approve the Second Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefit to
be derived therefrom, CITY and Developer agree to the following
amendment:
A. SECTION 3 of the Restated Agreement is amended to read as
follows:
3. TERM. This Agreement shall become effective as a
development agreement upon the effective date of the Annexation
(the "Effective Date"); provided, however, that if the Annexation
does not occur on or before JulY 1. 1997. this Agreement shall
become null and void unless the annexation proceedinqs have been
extended bY LAFCO. If the annexation proceedinqs have been
extended. this Aqreement shall become effective upon the effective
date of such Annexation: provided. however. if the annexation does
not occur by the end of such extension(s). this Aqreement shall
become null and void. Any of the foregoing to the contrary
notwithstanding, from the date of first reading of the ordinance
approving this Agreement, and unless or until this Agreement
becomes null and void, Owner shall be bound by the terms of
Paragraph 4. The Term of this Agreement for purposes other than
Paragraph 4 shall begin upon the Effective Date, and shall continue
for a period of twenty (20) years ("the Term").
9/9 /2-
The term shall also be extended for any period of time during which
issuance of building permits to the Developer is suspended for any
reason other than the default of the Developer, and for a period of
time equal to the period of time during which any action by the
City or court action limits the processing of future discretionary
approvals, issuance of building permits or any other development of
the property consistent with this Agreement.
B. Except for the provision set forth herein, each and every
provision of the Restated Agreement shall remain in full force and
effect.
C. Each person signing this Second Amendment on behalf of the
parties represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to so
execute and enter into a binding agreement and deliver this Second
Amendment on their behalf.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Second
Amendment on the date shown below.
CITY OF CHULA VIISTA, a municipal
corporation
DATE:
By:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
THE OTAY RANCH, L.P., a California
limited partnership
by Sky Communities, Inc., a
California corporation, its general
partner
DATE:
By:
James P. Baldwin, President
VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, a California
general partnership
DATE:
By:
James P. Baldwin, President
I hereby approve the form and legality of the foregoing Second
Amendment to the Restated Pre-Annexation Development Agreement this
9th day of January, 1997
M:\ho.e\attorney\a.end.vil
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
By: ~~Q _
Ann Moore, Assistant city Attorney
9/1~3
ORDINANCE NO.
cJ1R94:>
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE OTAY RANCH
PRE-ANNEXATION DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH
BALDWIN BUILDERS AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1996, the City Council adopted
the Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and
Baldwin Builders pursuant to Ordinance No. 2690; and
WHEREAS, there is now a mutual desire by the City and
Baldwin Builders to amend the Agreement for the first time to
extend the term of the effective date ("First Amendment") of said
Agreement; and
WHEREAS, on January 8,
reviewed the First Amendment to the
to approve the First Amendment.
1997, the Planning Commission
Development Agreement and voted
NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of the City of Chula
Vista ordains as follows:
SECTION I: The Otay Ranch Pre-Annexation Development
Agreement between Baldwin Builders and the city of Chula Vista is
hereby amended as set forth in the First Amendment to the Pre-
Annexation Development Agreement on file in the office of the city
Clerk as Document No.
SECTION II:
hereby authorized and
the Agreement for and
The Mayor of the City
directed to execute said
on behalf of the City of
of Chula vista
First Amendment
Chula Vista.
is
to
SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be of
full force on the effective date of annexation as set forth in the
attached First Amendment to the Pre-Annexation Development
Agreement.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
(' ^------ ~ q
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
C:\or\baldwin.2nd
98- /
FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE PRE-ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND BALDWIN BUILDERS
This First Amendment is entered into this day of ,
199 , by and between the City of Chula vista ("City"), a municipal
corporation and Baldwin Builders, a California corporation
("Developer") .
RECITALS
WHEREAS, on October 15, 1996, the City council adopted
the Pre-Annexation Agreement between the City of Chula vista and
Developer pursuant to Ordinance No. 2690; and
WHEREAS,
Developer Ranch to
the term of the
Agreement; and
there is now a mutual desire by the City and
amend the Agreement for the first time to extend
effective date ("First Amendment") of said
WHEREAS, on January 8,
reviewed the First Amendment to the
to approve the First Amendment.
1997, the Planning commission
Development Agreement and voted
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefit to
be derived therefrom, CITY and Developer agree to the following
amendment:
A. SECTION 3 of the Agreement is amended to read as follows:
3. TERM. This Agreement shall become effective as a
development agreement upon the effective date of the Annexation
(the "Effective Date"); provided, however, that if the Annexation
does not occur on or before Julv 1. 1997. this Agreement shall
become null and void unless the annexation proceedinqs have been
extended bv LAFCO. If the annexation proceedinqs have been
extended. this Aqreement shall become effective upon the effective
date of such Annexation; provided. however. if the annexation does
not occur bv the end of such extension(sJ. this Aqreement shall
become null and void. Any of the foregoing to the contrary
notwithstanding, from the date of first reading of the ordinance
approving this Agreement, and unless or until this Agreement
becomes null and void, Owner shall be bound by the terms of
paragraph 4. The Term of this Agreement for purposes other than
Paragraph 4 shall begin upon the Effective Date, and shall continue
for a period of twenty (20) years ("the Term").
The term shall also be extended for any period of time during which
issuance of building permits to the Developer is suspended for any
reason other than the default of the Developer, and for a period of
time equal to the period of time during which any action by the
City or court action limits the processing of future discretionary
r;!J~~
" ")
approvals, issuance of building permits or any other development of
the property consistent with this Agreement.
B. Except for the provision set forth herein, each and every
provision of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
c. Each person signing this First Amendment on behalf of the
parties represents and warrants that he or she is authorized to so
execute and enter into a binding agreement and deliver this Second
Amendment on their behalf.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Second
Amendment on the date shown below.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal
corporation
DATE:
By:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
BALDWIN BUILDERS, a California
corporation
DATE:
By:
Jimmy D. Johnson, Chief
Executive Officer
I hereby approved to form and legality of the foregoing First
Amendment to the Pre-Annexation Agreement this 9th day of January,
1997.
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
By:
Ann Moore
Assistant City Attorney
0--~
C:\ag\baldwin.1st
9[J~3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / P'
Meeting Date 1/14/97
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCS-96-06 - Consideration of a tentative subdivision
map known as Vista Del Mar, Chula Vista Tract 96-06 in order to
subdivide 3.46 acres located at the northwest quadrant of Del Mar Avenue
and "C" Street - Dan Irwin
Resolution / J" /3.:JApproving Chula Vista Tract 96-06, a Tentative
Subdivision map for fifteen single family lots on 3.46 acres located at the
northwest quadrant of Del Mar Avenue and "C" Street - Dan Irwin
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~t
(
REVIEWED BY: City ManagerJ\ ~6ti~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-.X.)
The applicant, Dan Irwin, has submitted an application for a tentative subdivision map known
as Vista Del Mar in order to subdivide 3.46 acres located on the westerly side of Del Mar
Avenue between Nixon Place and Shirley Street into 15 single family detached lots in the R-I-7
zone. (See Locator Exhibit A).
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-96-33, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. Based on the attached
Initial Study and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that there would be no
significant environmental impacts and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued
on IS-96-33.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the attached City Council Resolution approving a tentative subdivision map for Vista Del
Mar, Chula Vista Tract 96-06, in accordance with the fmdings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
On November 13, 1996, the Planning Commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend
approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map Vista Del Mar, Chula Vista Tract 96-06.
/(!J- /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 1/14/97
DISCUSSION:
1. Site Characteristics
The project site is rectangularly shaped and consists of two parcels having a total of 3.46 acres
(3.713 gross acres) with an existing single family dwelling located on the northerly 1. 66 acre
parcel. The southerly parcel is vacant and contains 1.80 acres. Topographically, the property
slopes downward from an elevation of 90 feet to 84 feet southerly along Del Mar A venue to an
elevation of 50 feet at the southwesterly corner and 43 feet at the northwesterly corner. The
average natural slope of the site is 8 % with a maximum slope of 20 %. The site also contains
a number of trees which will have to be removed. The properties in the immediate area are
generally 7000 sq. ft in size and range upward from 6000 sq. ft. in size.
2. Zoning and Land Use
Site
North
South
East
West
Rl
Rl
Rl
Rl
R3GD
Single Family and Vacant
Single Family and Vacant
Single Family Homes
Single Family Homes
Apartments
3. Proposal
The developer proposes to remove the single family dwelling and subdivide the property into 15
lots served by a single cul-de-sac street (Vista Del Mar Court) located between Nixon Place and
Shirley Street. Three lots will face Del Mar A venue, with the rest of the lots gaining access
from the cul-de-sac, except for two panhandle lots proposed on the north side of the property
which will be served by a 20 foot wide access easement. Three guest parking spaces are
provided for the two panhandle lots in accordance with the code. The lot sizes range from a
minimum of 6000 sq. ft. (4 lots) to 11,515 sq. ft. in keeping with the typical lot sizes in the
immediate area. The R-l zone allows 30% of the lots to be 6000 sq. ft. in size. Because of the
topography and proposed grading, a number of low profile retaining walls (2' to 5' in height)
are proposed in order to provide adequate pad area to accommodate a structure.
4. Analvsis
The proposed development meets the minimum lot size and other requirements of the R-l zone
and Subdivision Manual development guidelines. The code does not require any fencing for
single family development; however, staff has concerns regarding the private access drive to the
two panhandle lots. The access has a ten percent grade which is relatively steep but acceptable.
In addition, there is a downslope on the west side of the driveway. In order to provide a visual
demarcation, decorative fencing is being recommended for both sides of the driveway.
/tfl-2
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 1/14/97
Another area of concern was any fencing which might be located along the top of slope on the
westerly end of the subdivision. Any fencing contemplated on those properties should have the
ability to provide access to the downslope for maintenance. In the case of retaining walls over
4 feet in height, the developer should provide the ability to get to the top of wall for
maintenance of the slopes. Approval of the tentative map has been conditioned to address the
aforementioned concern.
5. Public Response
One adjoining property owner submitted a letter in response to the project outlining certain
concerns, and spoke at the Planning Commission meeting as well. This neighbor raised
concerns regarding potential obstruction of the view from that residence, as well as with the
quality of the homes relative to existing property values. City codes do not require and
conditions have not been imposed on proposed single-family developments which would require
retention of perceived view corridors. The property in question is proposed to be developed in
accordance with City standards which address building setbacks, height, and bulk in a manner
consistent with R-l single-family standards and consistent with the existing single-family homes
located adjacent to the south property line.
Although neither of these issues is addressed by City codes or other regulations, the applicant
has spoken with this neighbor and has provided a letter addressing these concerns (see attached
Exhibit #5). Specifically, the applicant has noted that the proposed sale price of homes within
the subdivision will be comparable to the value of adjacent homes, and provided information
describing lot elevations.
6. Conclusion
The applicant has successfully addressed issues raised by staff in response to the initial submittal,
and the currently proposed subdivision fits well into the area for which it is proposed. The
proposal meets applicable regulations for the R -1 zone as well as the guidelines of the
Subdivision Manual. Lastly, although concerns voiced by a neighbor are not addressed by City
regulations, the applicant has responded to them in a manner which should address these
concerns. Based upon this and the discussion in the foregoing report, staff recommends
approval of the project in accordance with the attached City Council Resolution.
FISCAL IMPACT: The applicant has paid all applicable processing fees.
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Draft City Council Resolution
Locator/Plans
Planning Commission Resolution and Minutes
Initial Study IS-96-33
Public Response/Applicant Response
Disclosure Statement
NOr SC,.,JN&b
,~
"
"
'/
It
1/
(m:\home\planning\patty/PCS9606c.rep)
/tJ-3
RESOLUTION NO. jg'5'53
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP VISTA DEL MAR, CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-06
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is diagrammatically
represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and commonly
known as Tentative Subdivision Map Vista Del Mar, Chula Vista Tract 96-06; and for the
purpose of general description herein consists of 3.46 acres located on the west side of Del Mar
Avenue between Nixon Place and Shirley Avenue in the R-I zone ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on June 17, Dan Irwin ("Developer") filed an application with the Planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista requesting approval of the tentative subdivision map in
order to subdivide said property into 15 single family detached residential lots (two of which are
panhandle lots) served by the widening of Del Mar Avenue and extending a new cul-de-sac street
westerly from Del Mar Avenue ("Project"); and,
C. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on
November 13, 1996, and voted (6-0) to recommend that the City Council approve the Project,
based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed below; and,
D. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 14, 1997, on the Project and to receive the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same.
WHEREAS NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
determine and resolve as follows:
n. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public
hearing on the Project held on November 13, 1996 and the minutes and resolutions resulting
therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
1
/t?J- f
m. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Initial Study, IS-96- 33 has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Environmental
Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and, based on the findings and determinations set
forth therein, hereby adopts the Negative Declaration prepared in connection therewith.
IV. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS! APPROVAL
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City
Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein for Vista Del
Mar, Chula Vista Tract No. 96-06 is in conformance with the various elements of the City
of Chula Vista General Plan, based on the following:
The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista General Plan Elements as
follows:
1. Land Use: The density of the project of 4.0 dwelling units per acre is
consistent with Low Medium Residential Density Land Use 3-6 DU's! Acre
designation of the General Plan.
2. Circulation: The lots will be served by the widening of Del Mar Avenue
and the installation of a new cul-de-sac street. The panhandle lots will be
served by a private driveway.
3. Housing: The project will provide additional housing consistent with the
zoning and development pattern in the neighborhood.
4. Conservation: The project site has been previously developed and there are
no sensitive plant species found on the property.
5. Parks and Recreation, Open Space: The developer will be required to pay
the Park Acquisition and Development fee with Final Map approval.
6. Seismic Safety: The project site is not adjacent to a located or inferred
earthquake fault.
7. Safety: The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have
reviewed the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety
policies and have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold
Standards for emergency services.
8. Noise: The units will be required to meet the interior noise level standards
of the Uniform Building Code.
9. Scenic Highway: The project site is not located adjacent to a designated
scenic highway.
2
)tJ~
10. Bicycle Routes: The project site is located within a single family residential
area and is not required to provide a separate bicycle lane.
11. Public Buildings: No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The
project is subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council certifies that
it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the region and has
balanced those needs against the public service needs of the residents of the City and the
available fiscal and environmental resources.
C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the optimum
sitting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as required by
Government Code Section 66473.1.
D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms to
all standards established by the City for such projects.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained
is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the
proposed development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that in light of the findings above, the City Council does hereby
approve the Tentative Subdivision Map subject to the conditions set forth below.
A. Tentative Subdivision Map Conditions
Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall:
GENERAL/PRELIMINARY
1. Design and construct all street improvements in accordance with Chula Vista
Design Standards, Chula Vista Street standards, and the Chula Vista Subdivision
Manual unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Obtain City Engineer
approval of detailed improvement plans prepared by a registered civil engineer
licensed in the State of California detailing horizontal and vertical alignment of
said streets. Design transition to meet existing improvements to the satisfaction
of the City Engineer.
Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to, asphalt concrete pavement,
base, concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, street signs, street name
signs, striping, sewer and water utilities, drainage facilities, street lights, signs,
and fire hydrants.
3
/tl-i
2. Install off-site public street improvements including, but not limited to, pavement,
curb, gutter, and street lights along the easterly portion of Del Mar Avenue from
the end of existing improvements north of proposed Vista del Mar Court to Shirley
Street.
3. Secure, in accordance with City standards, prior to approval of the final map the
construction of all public street improvements deemed necessary by the City
Engineer to provide service to the subject subdivision.
4. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Sweetwater Authority that
the subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water
storage facilities.
5. Provide minimum 12' wide paved access to all public drainage facilities and storm
drain clean outs to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
6. Provide paved access (minimum 12' width) to all public sewer manholes necessary
to serve the subdivision. Design access road to accommodate H-20 wheel loads
and maximum 15% grade to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
7. Install fire hydrants as determined by the City Fire Marshal. Said hydrant
locations shall be shown on the improvement plans.
GRADING/DRAINAGE
8. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer of precise grading plans prepared
by a registered civil engineer. All grading and pad elevations shall be within 2
feet of the grades and elevations shown on the approved tentative map or as
otherwise approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director.
9. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation
control plan as part of grading plans.
10. Show the location of existing cut/fill lines on grading plans unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer.
11. Submit a list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on
fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations prior to approval of the final
map.
12. Design all retaining walls to Chula Vista standards as determined by the City
Engineer. Show details for non-standard walls on the grading plans and submit
structural calculations for said walls for review and approval prior to issuance of
a grading permit. Include design recommendations for retaining walls in the soils
report for the project.
4 /tl- /
13. Submit a detailed geotechnical report prepared and signed and stamped by both a
registered civil engineer and certified engineering geologist prior to approval of
grading plans and issuance of a grading permit. Said report shall include a
structural analysis of the existing retaining wall along the westerly boundary of the
subdivision. The analysis shall determine whether the existing retaining wall is
adequate for the changing surcharge loads due to the proposed grading.
14. Submit a precise drainage study prepared by a registered civil engineer and
approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit or other
development permit. Design of the drainage facilities shall consider existing
drainage patterns. The drainage study shall show how downstream properties are
currently impacted. Said study shall include all area from the project to a point
downstream where said runoff is collected in a public drainage system. The extent
of the study shall be as approved by the City engineer.
15. Submit a detailed hydraulic study including inlet size and dry lane calculations
prior to approval of grading or improvement plans.
EASEMENTS
16. Dedicate for public use all streets shown on the tentative map within the
subdivision boundary.
17. Indicate on the final map a reservation for future reciprocal access and use
easements between the owners of Lots 5 & 6. Said easement shall include the
proposed driveway access and parking area shown on the tentative map.
18. Dedicate to the City on the final map drainage and sewer easements for any public
sewer and/or drainage facilities located outside the proposed public right-of-way.
Minimum widths of said easements shall be 15 feet or as determined by the City
Engineer.
19. Grant to the City a 5.5 foot wide street tree planting and maintenance easement
along all public streets within the subdivision.
20. Obtain and grant to the City drainage and sewer easements for any public drainage
and/or sewer facilities required to serve the proposed development that are located
on private offsite property.
21. Obtain and grant to the City right-of-way required to install full street
improvements along the easterly portion of Del Mar Avenue from Vista del Mar
Court to Shirley Street.
22. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days prior to consideration of the
final map by City if off-site right-of-way or easements cannot be obtained as
required by the Conditions of Approval.
5
/V~ ?l
After said notification, the developer shall:
a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off-site right-of-way or easements required
by the Conditions of Approval of the tentative map.
b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said right-of-way or
easements. Said estimate to be approved by the City Engineer.
c. Have all easements and/or right-of-way documents and plats prepared and
appraisals complete that are necessary to commence condemnation
proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the City may use its powers to acquire right-
of-way, easements or licenses needed for off-site improvements or work
related to the tentative map. The developer shall pay all costs, both direct
and indirect incurred in said acquisition.
The requirements of a, b, and c above shall be accomplished prior to the approval
of the final map.
AGREEMENTS
23. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and
employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents,
officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City,
including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any approval by
its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision pursuant to
Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the
subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the
City fully cooperates in the defense.
24. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and
employees from any damage, expense, claim, liability or cost (including attorney's
fees) arising from, for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from
this project.
25. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company")
are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television
service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only
those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance
with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further
compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating
and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been,
or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
6 )j;J__}
MISCELLANEOUS
26. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD '83).
27. Submit copies of the final map and improvement plan in a digital format such as
(DXF) graphic file prior to approval of the Final Map. Provide computer aided
Design (CAD) copy of the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry
calculations and submit the information in accordance with the City Guidelines for
Digital Submittal in duplicate on 3-lh HD floppy disk prior to the approval of the
Final Map.
Code requirements to be included as Conditions of Approval:
28. Comply with all applicable Federal, State and local laws, any and all rules and
regulations including sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and the Uniform
Building Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance
with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista
Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
29. Fencing shall be provided on both sides of the access driveway serving lots 5 and
6. Said fencing shall be subject to approval by the Planning Department and shall
be decorative in nature and substantial in construction to minimize its maintenance.
30. Any fencing installed at or near the top of slope on lots 6, 8, 9 and 10 shall have
a gate on each lot in order that the slopes may be accessible from above for
maintenance of the slope planting and removal of debris. This condition shall be
incorporated into the recorded Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R) and
shall apply to all owners including successors in interest.
31. Landscape and irrigation construction drawings shall be reviewed and approved by
the Director of Planning. Any developer-installed landscaping shall prescribe to
xeriscape design principles whenever possible.
32. A retaining wall shall be provided along the northerly property line of Lot 1 and
the southerly lot line of Lot 15 for the purpose of eliminating the proposed down
slopes in those areas, unless an alternative grading plan is submitted eliminating
said down slopes.
33. Any retaining walls over 4 feet in height should be designed to provide the ability
to easily get to the top of the wall for maintenance of the slopes.
34. Any retaining wall shall maintain a minimum 8 foot setback from the back of the
sidewalk. This restriction shall be reflected in the CC&R's for each affected lot.
35. The typical street planting pattern for comer lots shall be one tree street for each
street frontage.
7
jlJ-j tJ
36. Noise: The units will be required to meet the interior noise level standards of the
Uniform Building Code.
V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented
and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained
according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein
granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or
further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein
granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek
damages for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest
by the City's approval of this Resolution.
VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the
enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event
that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent
jurisdiction top be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be
automatically revoked and of no further force and effect without further action.
VII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION.
City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of Determination
and file the same with the County Clerk.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Q "- --y'\A A<H~
John M. Kaheny
City Attorney
~O^
-
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
8
Ii/.-/I
j~iin !i ~Pi i ~. ~ i ~ i!~ '--(1-/7/ .
i~ib ;~: ~~;: i q ~ II; i ; ~!II I ~ ~!
~it::;.I ~ 'I! lID I:>~ ~ ~ ~g ~ ~ t ~ ~ II
~I~~i~ i ~~ i~:1 ~ hi. g~ ~ Iq! d ~II I ~. i
;.!!~ 'Ii ~I;. I ~ i g ~ !!; I~ II ~i R i ~ ~ I
Iliii;! ! lid:!1 tll; t lill~ :!\ ~!!q q ii .
}!i~!:i c; ~ ~:~ le;lll~ nl ;; I II: I.; ;~I~ iUi~1 !!; ; I ; q t
'." ~. .~~ gR .,; i ... ~ i.' ! i . R
! iiji!~! i ~ q ~! ~!d ili ;1 I! ; ~ II ~ ill! !Pi: ~: ! i : II !! . ~
; ~i;!ili i; ~ ~ ~II !I!I~ !I ~ ~I ~~ !I ~I ~i !' ~::I !Ulii !~i II ~ ! I ~ !! ;11 ~!!I
~
o
I
to
0:1
za
Q
I ~~i
. ~,
, n_ ~~i
-0
---~~ II: ;
5 ~ ..,
~ ~
-,
.
o
Z
Eo-<
U
<
0::;
Eo-<
.. -....----
,
.
r i
, ;
i Iii!
. -i- ~!
: i zli!
J t o~
i I [;
i :
I~
<
~o::;
--<
>~
j~
~~.......
::r::
U<
I~
-..mil
~> -
-<
~
~
I ;
I Ii!
I 0
Ui
'.
. I'
s ~
~
~
>
-
Eo-<
-<
Eo-<
Z
~
Eo-<
,
~ ---
..mil
. ,
r. ~ Ii
~
.
. I ~
w .
dll~; i I
~ Ii!;; i
~~~a~~~ ~
a
4
-~ !~!~!~~~~!~II~!
: i 111!~!!li~I~~~1
~ - --
~ I 111!~~~;i~I~~~1
~
E; i 0_........
~ ~ _N....~.~..______
9
-
i
,
\ I!
o
z
.ON "WI
I
I
. I
: .. ~ I
:g I
I
~ I
} __L
N
G
tl;;
. ~-
~
.
.
.
..
II
- "
_i! In
.,'
~! !!I
I ".1
. .
--------------=
--
r-----r
Ii
~
Ii ,t.~ i: 1".ii"..,..,t'Mt/
,~ ,~ ,~ ~
--
191 "ON Jwt
NOCVW Y1 ~o OH::lN"flf
;el ':)]Q I'll NorDlO,",
1t>-I2.
~
<(
::II
I-
-
m
-
:J:
><
W
------
R3
C.Y.
MOBILE
HOME
PARK
SOUTH BAY
PIONEERS
CANTERBURY
COURT SENIOR
HOUSING
s~
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~, Vista Del Mar PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
C9 INITIAL STUDY
PROJECT 142 Del Mar Avenue Request: Proposal for 15 - 2,000 sq. /to ranch style,
ADDRESS,
single fomily dwellings on large lols.
SCUJ;, ALE NUMBER,
NORTH No Scale 15-96-23 Related case: PCS-96-06
~
//?~ /3
)
J/[J
ATTACHMENT 2
LOCATOR/PLANS
- 1-
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONAILY LEFT BLANK
_;2.-
ATTACHMENT 3
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION / MINUTES
~
-5-
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONAILY LEFT BLANK
-&-
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-96-06
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TIIAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR VISTA DEL
MAR, CHULA VISTA TRACT 96-06 AND ADOPT NEGATIVE
DECLARATION IS-96-23
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on June 17, 1996 by the developer, Dan
Irwin; and,
WHEREAS, said application requests approval to subdivide 3.713 gross acres, Chula
Vista Tract 96-06, Vista Del Mar; and,
WHEREAS, the tentative subdivision project is located on the west side of Del Mar
Avenue between Nixon Place and Shirley Street and the proposal is to subdivide the
property into 15 lots (two lots of which are panhandle lots) for single family detached
homes along with all associated on site and off site public and private improvements
("Project"); and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-96-23, of potential adverse environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the project was conducted by the Environmental
Review Coordinator and has concluded that there would be no significant environmental
impacts; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on the
tentative map and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and it mailing to property
owners and tenants within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10
days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00
p.m., November 13, 1996, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered and recommends adoption of the
Negative Declaration issued on the Initial Study, IS-96-23.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED TIIAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the attached draft City
Council Resolution in the form attached with said minor modifications as may be approved
by the City Attorney, approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 96-06
in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein and adopting
-1-
the Negative DecJaration issued on 15-96-23 ;f1 connection therewith.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to
the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th day of November, 1996, by the following vote,
to-wit:
A YES: Commissioners Davis, Ray, Tarantino, Thomas, Tuchscher, Willett
NOES: None
ABSENT: Salas
ABSTAIN: None
Frank Tarantino, Chair
A TrEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
m:/home/planninglmando/pcs9606.pcr
~ 9-
Excerpt From 11/13/96 Planning Commission Minutes
ITEM 4:
PUBLIC HEARlNG: PCS-96-06; CONSIDERATION OF A TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP KNOWN AS VISTA DEL MAR, CHULA VISTA TRACT
96-06 IN ORDER TO SUBDIVIDE 3.46 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF DEL MAR AVENUE AND "C" STREET -
Dan Irwin
Assistant Planning Director Lee presented the staff report, and noted that staff recommended
approval in accordance with the conditions stated in the staff report.
Commissioner Willett said he had observed the traffic. The project with only 15 homes would
not contribute to the traffic.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Dan Irwin, 7449 Girard, CV, the applicant, stated that the project consisted of 15 homes, and
they were providing a full City street. There would be no Mello-Roos. They would be bringing
sewer into the area where there was only septic. He requested approval of the project.
Theresa Grady, 6 N. Del Mar Ave., CV,read a letter which she had previously submitted and
was not part of the package. The letter indicated that she and her husband were not opposed
to the project, but were concerned about the view of Point Lorna, the Bay, and the Bridge.
They had applied for and received a variance for a patio, which was granted because of the
view. She wanted to know if somehow the City could assure them that their view would not be
obstructed. She was also concerned about the quality of the homes. She was hoping to keep
the value of the homes in that area by building homes of comparable value. (A copy of the
letter is in the project me.)
Commissioner Willett asked when Ms. Grady had bought the home. She replied that it was
June 3, 1993. Commissioner Willett asked if there were CC&Rs to stipulate the purchase of
the view. Ms. Grady answered affrrmatively.
Assistant Planning Director Lee said that typically homes today would be two-story. All the
views from this property would be impactive. There were no guarantees when buying that there
would be a view over someone else's property. At this point, the City has no concern over the
plans. They would try to minimize the impacts but everything was in accordance with City
regulations .
Commissioner Tuchscher asked if staff knew the finished floor elevation of her home. A
discussion followed regarding the pad elevation between Ms. Grady's home and the various lots
near her home.
Commissioner Davis asked Mr. Irwin to give an estimate of the price ranges. Mr. Irwin stated
the range would be between $230,000 and $259,000, depending on the lot size. The value
would be similar to existing homes in the area.
- r-
Armida Martin Del Campo, 4064 Bonita Road, Suite 101, Bonita, stated that she was the
realtor working with Mr. Irwin. She said the quality of the project was tremendous.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSC (Willett/Thomas) 6-0 (Commissioner Salas excused) to adopt Resolution PCS-96-06
recommending approval in accordance with the draft City Council resolution, based on the
fIndings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
- /0 ~
"
ATTACHMENT 4
INITIAL STUDY
- //-
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
.
.
- I?- -
I
I
\
"....'
\.
negative
declaration
PROJECT :\A.1\1E:
Vista Del Mar
PROJECT LOCATION:
142 Del Mar Avenue
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
563-290-06, 563-301-02
PROJECT APPLICA.NT:
DBL D Del Mar
CASE NO: IS-96-23
DATE: September 30,1996
A. Proiect Setting
The project site is a 3.46 acre parcel located on the western side of Del Mar Avenue
benveen Bayview Way to the north and "c" Street to the south. There is one structure on
the site. The average natural slope of the site is 8% with a maximum slope of 20%. The
site is surrounded by single family residential to the north, east and south. To the west of
the site there is multi-family residential and commercial.
B. Proiect Description
The project consists of an application for a Tentative Subdivision Map for the
construction of fifteen 2,000 s.f. ranch style homes. Lot sizes range from 6,000 s.f. to
16,560 s.f.
Fire Department staffhas stated that there will be one fire hydrant required on-site. Also,
due to site location, it is recommended that a security evaluation be performed on the site.
The distance to the nearest fire station is 1.5 miles and reaction time is approximately
three minutes. The Fire Department ",oill be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection to the site without an increase in personnel or equipment.
Pursuant to Government Code No. 65995 (Developer Fees), the applicant will be required
to pay school impact fees. The discretionary actions include the approval of a Tentative
Subdivision Map.
C.
Compatibility with Zoning and Plans
The current zoning on-site is R-l (Single-family residential) and the site is designated
Low-Medium on the General Plan. The proposed project is in compliance with the
Zoning Ordinance and General Plan.
1- / - /3 ~
_ city of chula vista planning department OlY Of
environmental review section. (HULA VISTA.
?
~\r?-
-.-
. -.;: --.;:-.::
~~
D. Identification of En\ironrnental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including the attached
Emironmental Checklist Fonn) detennined that the proposed project ",ill not have a
significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report
v.ill not be required. This Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance ",ith
Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
E. Mitigation necessary to avoid silmificant effects
The proposed project v.ill not result in any significant or potentially significant
environmental impacts, therefore, no project specific mitigation is required.
An Initial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental
Checklist Fonn) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental
effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report v.ill.not be required. This
Negative Declaration has been pH:,pared in accordance v.ith Section 15070 of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
D. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
"
City of Chula Vista: Keith Barr, Planning
Barbara Reid, Planning
Annando Liuag, Planning
Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Steve Thomas, Engineering
Garry Williams, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Doug Perry, Fire Marshal
MaryJane Diosdada, Crime Prevention
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney
.
Chula Vista City School District: Dee Peralta
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
.'
Applicant's Agent: V. Michael Fraire, Architect
.
!M:_1>"",,",glkdth\do_..d)
- 14--
hlc2
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and ErR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Hydrology Analysis for Vista Del Mar (CV Tract No. 96-06) in Chula Vista-
(DGB Survey and Mapping, August 8, 1996)
3. Initial Studv
This environmental det=ination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further infonnation regarding
the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
~
lJ~<~ yt~- fff2~
EJ\'VIRONMEmAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 5/93)
- IS--
Case No.: IS-96-23
CITY DATA SHEET
PLA.N1\1NG DEPARTI\1E]\'T
I.
Current Zoning on site:
R-l (Single-family residential)
North: IL
South: R3GD
East: RI
West: RI
Does the project conform to the current zoning? Yes
II.
General Plan land use designation on site:
Low-Medium
North: Low-Medium
South: Low-Medium
East: Low-Medium
West: Medium
Is the project compatible with the General Plan Land Use Diagram? Yes
Is the project area designated for conservation or open space or adjacent to an area so designated? N
Is the project located adjacent to any scenic routes? No
(If yes, describe the design techniques being used to protect or enhance the scenic quality of the route).
III. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following:
Students
Units Generating Generated
School CaDacitv Enrollment ProDosed Factors From Proiect
Elementary: Rosebank 650 673 16 .30 4.8
Junior High: .29
Senior High: Chula Vista 1836 1367 16 .10 1.6
High
IV. Remarks: N/A
H~/-flZl
Directorjf Planning or Repr~entafute
~
/.-.Iiu'
ate
.
- / (p -
E;'\\'IRO;'\1I1E~lAL CHECKLIST FOR.l\f
1. Name of Proponent: DBL D Del Mar
2.
Lead A.gency Name and Address:
7449 Girard Ave.
La Jol1a, CA
92037
3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 619/454-0044
4.
Name of Proposal:
Vista Del Mar
5. Date of Checklist: September 27, 1996
- ir; -
Case .\0.1$-96-23
(M:\homl:\planning\keith\cl:JiSLdel)
Pagel
..........,
.........., -- Lea ....
-- tJoJo. -- ""
'-' -.-. '-' '-'
I. LA1'iD USE .0\.."-1) PL.o\..1'I,1\1NG. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or.. 0 0 0 IS!
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 IS!
policies adDpted by agencieLwith jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Affect agricultural reSDurces or DperatiDns 0 0 0 IS!
(e.g., impacts tD sDils or farmlands, or impacts
frDm incDmpatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 IS!
an established cDmmunity (including a IDw-
incDme or minDrity cDmmunity)?
Comments: The project is consistent with existing General Plan designations of R-M (Medium
Residential) and zoning of R-l (Single-family Residential). The proposed project is in
compliance with the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan.
n. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed Dfficial regiDnal or IDcal
pDpulatiDn projectiDns?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either
directly Dr indirectly (e.g., thrDugh projects in
an undevelDped area Dr extensiDn of majDr
infrastructure) ?
c) Displace existing hDusing, especially affDrdable
hDusing?
Comments: The project is the construction of 15 single-family homes and would not exceed
grDwth forecasts, nDr induce growth either locally or City-wide.
o
o
o
IS!
o
o
o
IS!
o
o
o
IS!
m. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impacts involving:
a) Unstable earth conditiDns at changes in 0 0 0 IS!
geDIDgic substructures?
b) DisruptiDns, displacements, compactiDn or 0 0 0 IS!
overcovering Df the SDil?
c) Change in topDgraphy or ground surface relief 0 0 0 IS!
features?
d) The destructiDn, covering or modificatiDn of 0 0 0 IS!
any unique geolDgic or physical features?
(M:\bomc~\l:ClhIcl:liJ1.dd)
- (X-
Parc2
~
~ ~ r.... ....
-= ..-.. ~ ~o
""""" """-" """"" """""
e) .lv:Jy increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 ~
either on or off the site?
f) Changes in deposition or erosion of lY'...ach 0 0 0 ~
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or .
erosion wruch may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed 9f the ocean or any
bay inlet or lake?
g) Exposure of people or propeny to geologic 0 0 0 ~
haz:rrds such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar haz:rrds?
Comments: The project would require some on-site grading but would not create any landform
hazards or modifications.
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
.
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 ~ 0
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or propeny to water 0 0 0 ~
related haz:rrds such as flooding or tidal
waves?
c) Discharge into surface waters or other 0 0 0 ~
alteration of surface water quality (e.g.,
temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 ~
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 ~
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 ~
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 ~
groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 ~
i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 ~
waters?
j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 ~
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments: Project would not create additional drainage impacts to adjacent off-site areas.
(M:\bome\PIanlili!<,"",,\CilisujeI)
-/1-
""oJ
...........,
- ~ ...... ....
SipI!bDt l"'- SipI!bDt No
bapoct "'-'" bapoct bapoct
V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 0 t8I
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 t8I
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, 0 0 0 t!:I
or cause any change in climate, either locally
or regionally?
d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 t8I
e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or 0 0 0 t8I
non-stationary sources of air emissions or the
deterioration of ambient air quality?
Comments: Air quality would not be affected by this project.
T,
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CmCULATION. Would
the proposal result in:
"
a) Increased velUcle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 t8I
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e,g., 0 0 0 t8I
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 t8I
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 t8I
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 t8I
bicyclists?
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 t8I
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 t8I
h) A 'large project' under the Congestion 0 0 0 t8I
Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400
or more average daily velUcle trips o~ 200 or
more peak-hour vehicle trips.)
Comments: Project implementation would not create sufficient traffic as to negatively affect LOS
=dards at any adjacent intersections.
(M ,1I>om<~Iannm<\kcUb'<kli>t.deI)
-7D~
hlc4
~
--
lmpod
""'"""'"
--
u.Joa
"'-'"
L<a ....
.....,..,..,
lmpod
s.
lmpod
VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would rhe
proposal resuJr in impacts 10:
a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 0 -~
concern or species that are =didates for
listing?
-
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 ~
trees)?
c) Locally designated natural co=unities (e.g, 0 0 tJ ~
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 ~
vernal pool)?
e) Wildlife .dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 ~
f) Affect regional habitat'preservation planning 0 0 0 ~
efforu?
Comments: There are no endangered biological species on this project site. No biological
concerns are present at this time.
VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 ~
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 ~
inefficient manner?
c) If the site is designated for-mineral resource 0 0 0 ~
protection, will this project impact this
protection?
Comments: Site is not designated for mineral resource protection and there will be no energy
conservation conflicts.
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 ~
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to: petroleum products, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 ~
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 ~
health hazard?
{M'-'I>I&ooio:\keiIb'cllisl.4oI) - !J-/- "':05
~
""- .....,.,... r.... ....
-- ""'" ~, ""
....... ,..,......, ....... .......
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 ~
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 0 ~
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments: The proposed plan would not cause a risk of upset in the City. The project would
not release toxic or hazardous materialinto the environment during upset conditions.
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 ~
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 ~
Comments: Noise levels are not expected to increase with implementation of this project.
"
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government seT1lices in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 ~
b) Police protection? 0 0 0 ~
c) Schools? 0 0 0 ~
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 ~
roads?
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 ~
Comments: No new governmental services will be required to serVe the project.
XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact
the City's Threshold Standards?
o
o
o
~
AJ; descn'bed below. the proposed project does not adversely impact any of the seen
Threshold Standards.
a) FirelEMS
o
o
o
~
.'
The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to
calls within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75 % of
the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is 1.5 miles away and would be associated with a 3 minute
response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
(M:\bamo\p-.,\I:,",,'<1:lis1.dcl)
- dd- -
1'1:<6
.......".,."
~,
lmpoct
~
~
1JnIoo
"""-"
'- ....
~IICI.DI
lmpoct
~.
lmpoct
Co=ents: The Fire Department will require the following improvements to the project site:
. a fire hydrant will be required
The Fire Department can adequately deliver service to the site without an increase in
equipment or personnel.
b) Police
o
o
o
t8j
The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84 % of Priority I calls
v,'itbin 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of
4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7
minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes
or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Co=ents: Due to site location, the Police Department recommends a security evaluation for the
site.
,
c) Traffic
o
o
o
t8j
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of
1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach
LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with
freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply
with this Threshold Standard.
d) ParkslRecreation
o
o
o
t8j
Tne Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I ,000 population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
e) Drainage
o
o
o
t8j
Tne Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not
exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary
improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plants) and City
Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold
Standard.
f) Sewer
o
o
t8j
o
(M,'bomc~\"i!hlcklist..,n
-;23-
1'>:,7
.........",
~
"""""
...........,
~
u.-..
-..
'-- ....
"'-,
"""""
""
"""""
Th: Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed
City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary
improvements consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: Adjacent sewer line capacities are adequate and project will be required to conn:ct to
existing faciliti:s.
g) Water
o
o
o
tSI
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that waier quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-
set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Pr ".
XIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a .need for new systems, or
substanIial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 tSI
b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 tSI
c) Local or regional water treatment or 0 0 0 tSI
distribution facilities?
. d) S:wer or septic tanks?
0 0 0 tSI
e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 tSI
f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 tSI
Comments: The proposed housing subdivision will not generate a need for new systems or
alteration to the aforementioned utilities.
XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 tSI
public or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 tSI
scenic route?
c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 tSI
(M,Ibome'fo_'"',"'",klisLd") -dt./ h:e!
-
""'-
""- ~ ..... ....
..........' """'" -.., So
"-" "'-"" "-" "-"
d) Create added light or glare sources that couJd 0 0 0 t2I
increase the level of sl-y glow in an area or
cause this proj~t to fail to comply with Section
19.66.100 of the ChuJa Vista Municipal Code,
Title 19?
e) Reduce an addirional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 t2I
Co=ents: There are no scenic vistas or views in the vicinity of the site that will be affected
by project implementation.
:~..v. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal:
a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or 0 0 0 t2I
the destruction or a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
...
b) Will the proposal resuJt in adverse physical or 0 0 0 t2I
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building. structure or object?
c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 t2I
physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cuJtural values?
d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 t2I
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 t2I
EIR as an area of high potential for
archeological resources?
Co=ents: The site is not in an area of high potential for archeological resources. The
proposed project will not have any negative impacts on archeological resources.
A"VI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the
proposal resul! in the al!erarion of or the
destruction of paleontological resources?
Co=ents: Due to the fact that the site is not located in an area of high potential paleontological
resources as identified by the City's General Plan EIR, no negative impacts will occur as a resuJt of
this project.
o
o
o
Ii:I
/"-.
XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 Ii:I
regional parks or other recrearional facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational,opportunities? 0 0 0 Ii:I
(M'\bc<oo"'......."'oith'<kJiu.o1cl)
- d- J'---
J>.:<9
c) Interfere wjth recre.ation parks & recre.ation
plans or programs?
Co=ents: This project will not cre.ate any new demands on recreation facilities.
A"'VITI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE: See NegaIive DeclaraIion for
rnanda10ry findings of significance. If an EIR is
needed, this section should be completed.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self...sustaining levels, thre.aten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate..
important examples of the major periods or
California history or prehistory?
Co=ents: None of the impacts associated with the project are considered significant and the
project as a whole would not degrade the environment or substantially affect any biological
habitats or cultural resources.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short...term, to the disadvantage of long...term,
environmental goals?
Co=ents: The scope and nature of the project would not result in the curtailment of any short
term or long term environmental goals.
c) Does the project have impacts that are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
me.ans that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
Co=ents: All impacts, both individual and cumulative have been found to be less than si
facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project and no new facilities will be required. The
significant, as a result of the applicant's compliance with the City's Code requirements. City
project does not have the potential for individually limited effects -being cumulatively-
considerable.
.,.
..........,
-
"""""
-
........,.,.
"""'"
"'-""
So
'"'-'
Lao ....
...... ...,
'"'-'
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
(M,\bame~n:lkcilh\ckli>t.d'Q
-,;2&
Pafc]O
~
,.,."..",
""""""'"
'"-"
,.,."..",
""""""'"
u.u...
...,.,.""
Lao ....
~
'"-"
So
"'-"
d) Doos tho projxi have environmontal effects
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
burrum beings, either directly or indirectly?
Co=ents: T'Ile project is not of sufficient scope to cause any such impacts.
o
o
o
l8I
XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES:
The follov.'ing project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be
implemented during the design, construction or operation of the project:
.
Project Proponent
Date
XX. E1\'VIRONME~"'TAL FACTORS POTE~"'TIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages. .
o Land Use and Planning 0 Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services
o Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service
Systems
o G<-..ophysical 0 Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
o Water
o Hazards
---
o Cultural Resources
o Air Quality
o Noise
o Recreation
o Mandatory Findings of Significance
(M,""""""'_\k.;!b\ckili:.6cI)
-;2-1-
Pale!!
XXI. DETER.\iI1'<ATI,-_.:
. On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the [gI
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and 0
an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but 0
at least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier do.-'"UIIlent pursuani to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially
significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An
ENVIRONMEJ-..'T AL IMP ACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects
that remain to be addressed.
..
aJ-~~ ~~/
Signatur~)
rJ/.:Jp//J?
,
Date
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
- .-..-
(Io!:\bame'l>~lkciIhlcl:list.deI)
_ --=--:/ c: _
p"el2
/' ~ :.) '/1
ROUTING FORM
DATE: June 26, 1996
~
/,"'" '
/ v,
F~:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Anne Moore, Asst city Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Doug Perry, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Garry williams, Landscape Planner
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater,Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Doug Reid (community Development Projects)
other
f'r./) t1
Barbara Reid
Environmental section
SUBJECT:
Application for Initial Study (IS-96-33/FA-700 /DQ-306)
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR- _/FB- -IDQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----1
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- IDQ- )
The Project consists of: Construction of fifteen 2,000 sq. ft.
ranch style houses.
Location:
142 Del Mar Avenue
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 7-10-96
-?-1-
Case ~o. /S - b /9
INTERDEPARTME/'\TAL COMME]\"T SHEETS
ENGI:"\'EERI/'\G DIVISION
1. Drainage
A. Is the project sire within a flood plain? AJ o.
If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary. ,11/ / A
B. What is the location and description of existing on-site drainage facilities? /1/0""<..
S.....R(IIU- .('/aw +owll/Z.'/S A CONCR~-ft:.. c/o/elf 0-</ f-,(J Wc.s7<L/"
DO" "'dARt of /-/,<- Ole ot:)~ItTy.
C. he they adequate to serve the project? Y<. > .
If not, please explain briefly. 570II.M WA7l1!. w:11 h<... CONV<"J by A / B"
LXoc. fa b<... .r?IZi)u:~j b.y +),<- r.!rV(It<,lnn +0 '" Ct>AJCR,-r<- c;I,.n/,l
flow: ^'; ;/11 -fl., WLS7(.uv d;p<e-(fo,,/. fc~ -R.. ,...",r4\.,~ c."c~<./' crt- -t<-. s:+...
,
D. What is the location and description of existing off-site drainage facilities?.4 ca"/c.R~--r!...
d'-ILl! is Li>C.A;J fa fI.<... [..,JLsf" of -fJ<... O.l(OI<'~IZ-r,,- -4N/ C-oAlV<."..;
S/OtLM Wkf(" A),"l'i7Iv.r<-s'1{~/./ A/ltJVNd 1-h<.. AcI//1Lt~ Ap.AIZ"7MCN/ c.v-.oi{x
E. he they adequate to serve the project? NO. ,0"-'-"'''-
If not, please explain briefly. -;J,,_ C/)A)c.R<.~ cI72/1 CoA/v,,.-s [.vA/<" fa /f "../
~l?u.J .f';u/ A,zl A c.<.rr fa A /"7(>.6:/<... ), oh<... ,o,1.e.K. /"i{<... Ad/'./.'iJNk!...
PI"",; +tu>h f-j,.~... cILv-<-/oPM~.if hAc." CM-S"<... P/ood;",? /C),(D,6k"..,s c/c;wNS7;;
At f/,-<.- /7,;b:k ),D/">-<- PAa.k. A J.r~",-y.. .s+"""r ~ ~ tr.-y;~ ",^-ci
n. Transportarion 7//"<>'f"C-J.).7""f'o... C:"r ~:~ fr:or to ,.J,.I"""",,-,,- o-f ~ y....J.tj 1""-''''':
A.
What roads provide primary access to the project?
lli 'de~ ~~
B. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project (per day)?
\6 'S"PD "):. \0 ~''??I'''''''C'"D ",. '''''fi) -rf!-\'VS(vA'/
Dd J.Aa(" A~e"'-<.:>e 'c!..-' ~e.e-t I
)
C. What are the Average Daily Traffic (A.D.T.) volumes on the. primary access roads before and
after project completion?
Street Name Before After
"lJ, \ lM-Y' M=~\)G SOO (e&o.",~ (.50 (e,""", .J
.,e' :S-\{uz...-\ \Ie:, 0 \ q 40
\oJ. ~~~ NW"..o<?"'- S-;:;LbO 5-::'50
Do any of these volumes ex=d the City's Level-of-Service (L.O.S.) "Cn design ADT
volume? If yes, please specify. ~o
~
Wl'Cor.'H:>MEII'l.AN},'!NG\S'TOREIN021.93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.93) .3
- 0-
Page 2
GseNo. /5"6'79
If the A.D.T. or L.O.S. "C" design volume is unknown or not applicable, explain briefly.
W/A
. D. Are the primary a=ss roads adequate to serve the project?
If not, please explain briefly. ~ I A
,
E. Would the project =ate una=ptable Levels of Service (LOS) at inte=tions adjacent to
or in the vicinity of the project site? 1..\",
If so, identify: Location iJl A
.
Cumulative L.O.S. /J/A
F. Is the proposed project a "large project" under the Congestion Management Program? (An
equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehick trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). If yes, a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will be requined. In this case the TLA will
have to demonstrate that the project will not create an unmitigatabk adverse impact, or that
all related traffic impacts are not mitigated to a level of non-significance.
Yes '''-. No (l'5D A,,::>, 00( :2..400 AvT)
The following questions apply if a Traffic Impact Analysis is not requined.
G. Is traffic mitigation required to reduce traffic impacts that will result from impkmentation of
the proposed project? Yes X No
If yes, please describe. I.. ) I A
.
H. Is the project co_n~istent with the criteria established in the City's Transportation Phasing Plan,
General Plan Traffic Element, and all other pertinent traffic studies? Please reference any
other traffic impact studies for roadway segments that may be impacted by the proposed
project. '-If"-='" kj(') n.J.).c", -h-CL~i c q.,+U~I.~ ',\",-C'.k<"d.
I.
J.
Is a traffic study requined?
Is there any dedication requined?
If so, please specify.
}-.jo
Yes -,c No
'. t W
e.-,< (~lA S GO I2J)
I
,
-'S"'n-,"-..t-<'1"-""':
wPCr.~ME'I"'-'J<}.'INC1'.SJ'()RDN022.93 (Ro!. 102.1.93) (lid 1021>.93)_ 31 _
Page 3
K.
L.
M.
ill. Soils
Case No. ;/<;- ';'1'9
Is tkre any street widening r~uired? 'Ye...S
If so. please specif . ( )J,~LvI.- I}.I'- \ UcA-V Nww. -t-o
rl~;"'.'" '-.\J.. r",^\iit::.,Q. % V7)?~
AIe th(ere any other screet im;rovements required? 'J.e""
If so, please spe(:ify the general nature of the n=ssary improve,ments.
""T"""~Ll.~ 0.,,\0 ,~'~<< .<s~~~o...\\t. ; sWe..2--I;: \,'::,~!,~V\L; ~
~\\'V\~ r,^~ ,?",M""~\/IM. '\0. '^^~. (.\
, .
3(" :..uir\<,- '" "b -\-" "",,--6
, )
""'0 -d; h:;',', .
Will the project and related public improvements provide satisfactory traffic service for
existing conditions and future build out General Plan conditions? (Please provide a brief
explanation). Yes "-',<r>~t"'('* \0"U ,\"0':'" ,,~<'. ~s-\ac....J,..",~
. ~ ,I, ~ . " \
~-' . ~'0JLU. I.oL)\~ . ~,.l,., "",^,.
A. AIe there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the project site? !.,AlKNo....;..)
B. If yes, spe(:ify these conditions. N / A-
C. Is a Soils Report necessary? 1<.5
IV. Land Form
V. Noise
VI.
8'/.
A. 'What is the average natural slope of the site? /"
B. What is the maximum natural slope of the site? .:2 r);; 0
AIe there any traffic.related noise levels impacting the site that are significant enough to justify that
a noise analysis be required of the applicant? /1J 0
Waste Generation
-
-
How much solid and liquid (sewer) waste will be generated by the proposed project per day?
Solid .ljPPI'.<)",-:-li1Uy 37/ 16$ W:// 0<... ~'N{~II'7J .t>a dAy
Liquid :5 975 ~Ir//D"'S / f)Ay.
What is the location and size of existing sewer lines on or downstream from the site?
f:.)i.....s/T,.,c s( w-(~ L,."''L5 iN fh<.. ,A--'!<.A -to be. c:ltvu/)~'f..d.
,
u... -fD LL,)c..4~ /ANS iNti: /,."" A ex.'s7;"" 5(. we
L:N<"5 ;N ;1-";<... 1"fJ/'!A f),kr -M<.- cI,,~pp<-~ '=.0'./,/ c.o""",{<-r fo.
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? (If no, please explain) A/O. /he.- ~ vdo&
P'n>fox=....'bs", :N>/hll A 50.1'''- L:",,- f),~ w;// Floo-J ;N of/.... 50"';'''.1</'''' cfl{'!c-rTo,j ;,.J /.J<L
hA~ Avt"'....... wJl:uI W;// CoNN<c"/lo A B" I've. LoN'- P/oW:Nr; :",iIk W-<'S/CA/y
dil!.<.c1ioJ 1N V;s7A ()-c. ht'rll. Go~f2-r: ~;s ~"N"L c..o""'.v<t.7S f(J hNtl71:k<' 8" L.,'Nf.. P/~..v,'~/'"
NDL7?lW"t.~~1 I'~<' 10. ; Sc.w'<. L.""'-L FIDW,'''' IN fh~ A/oC77i'w-rf7(..c.1
wPC,F,'.HOMEll'!.ANNINGISTOIlEINOn93 ~. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.93) Page 4
J;/!-<.</':"tJ c&-f.5 AId AI')X~.( ,1-0 c.oN"'<<,-_~O "'''t,,"x,s-1iN'f Scw<,,- L.J,v,<. ~
''',
Cc.seNo. /5-6y9
VII. National Pollmant Dischan,e Elimination SVS1em rNPDES) Stonnwater Reauirements
Will the applicant ~ required to fue a Notice of Intent with the State Water Resources Contra! Board
for coverage under an !\l'DES Stormwater Permit? NO.
. If yes, specify which NPDES permit(s) and explain why an NPDES pennit is required. /-' /,;1 .
Will a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) be required for the proposed project?
Yes >< No
Additionalcomments CVHC- 5'0(70'"" /'7,~D,I;;"D 1C<''i",.JI?,c.s /I"'Y'PueSD.-.I u,'/A~J
jN c:!(.lfJJiloht....ifI 7D t..t"77/;7<- ~<s--;- /,?,;fNAR-"'<"A.i"/ PA!Ac7/c<s fD P~c/.J4..~ /.?o//';"7~N7
, -
f'~()h f..,J1'[1!,'''''c.
,
-,-,
~..,~
S7DI!M
wA'7ZJt
C.ONV'(.y......""'CL...
5.,....,7<,.....,.
vm Remarks
Please identify and discuss any remaining potential adverse impacts, mitigation measures, or other
issues. n we.. !2{.\I;tIoYJ ;""P.<DIIU,,<JrpLAN5 /:-N.I-r:~/c/ Cllak-<.j -Ij<.. AR-v1.
0)' w(~ lANAhu...... fa L"CA/Z... AN e.x:.,.;-/7......c:: SC:w,., L,.)i.I"(.... 7),<- r./(v(/pp~
"
1.,,)0&/) be /166.... 7-0 G:>N/lC.C./ -;'~ IN fh" 11~-<, A.
:2) A 8" SCw<1t L;N'- 15: f/'" 1'7;",;"'&_
toJ!. h~
",6/;C SCW(;( 5 7<".."
3) ,t?oss;6~ F/ODC/;P'; f)4Jbt.h$' NAy 6~_ CJec.~1 FOf! -!-)<.. /706;1<- ;'0"''''--
v
.oAl!k d.o"'Als---;7,,,,,,, ('/4).... fk cIr~tI~f''''{if/ If' fh<., cAv-u'o,O<.( COJ'VN{c75
-/i.<-. "'L.<OODSJ /8" '--;;;j/C.. fD -rh-c... C<;'vc.,t'c7'<- C//A/VNc.L..
"/)
A Sewe.f .s:--+Jy N\"'!+
C;-i--, br~ (r:~ t.
I
h..... f'\e,J: UA."<-.J..
y:rcv,J" .A
~ C!~n'O~ 1.,. ~
, . /
~J'\-r~j:",^ P\~
7/ If /7~
eer or Representative
Date
WPCP,'O!O~1<tNC1'STOREINO;2.93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.93)
-33-
PageS
ROUTING FORM
,
" -
DATE: June 26, 1996
~" 'J1i1:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff SWanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Anne Moore, Asst city Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Doug Perry, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Garry Williams, Landscape Planner
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Doug Reid (Community Development Projects)
Other
7D
...--
~: ~a-R-eid
~---
SUBJECT:
- - -- - ;~~iro~~:~:;"~
.eJ- -_/
Application for Initial Study (IS-96-~/FA-700 /DQ-306)
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR- -!FB- -!DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB-_/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC-_ERR-----1
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
- Tbe Project consists of: Construction of fifteen 2,000 sq. ft.
ranch style houses.
Location:
142 Del Mar Avenue
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 7-10-96
?)(-I -
Case. No. ,- :.;:~.- <?
FIRE DEPARTME1\l
A. What is the distan~ to the nearest fire station? And what is the Fire Depanment's estimated
reaction rime? /..s- /J.1 r L-,;;""" <;; '3 In r P t/ 7""6 .-
B. Will the Fire Depanment be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection for the
proposed facility without an increase in equipment or personnel? t16S:
C. Remarks f>RoJ I ~~ Ir-J yO r.1,.J ~ t:..:-t' IS M--k. .1J /\ (Ar LE S"
fi",,~ f.f-0 () t.4-;..J-r ~ &. f t..o ; J I .(J{'""J0
fJo4-j~~
Fire Marshal
7/5/4C-
/
Date
3..s-" -
WPCP.aO~"NING\S'I"ORJThIO:u.93 (Rd. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.93)
Pago6
ROUTING FORM
DATE: June 25, 1995
TO: Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff SWanson, .Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Anne Moore, Asst city Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Doug Perry, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
Community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Garry Williams, Landscape Planner
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
SWeetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Doug Reid (Community Development Projects)
Other
FROM:
Barbara Reid
Environmental Section
1$
SUBJECT: Application for Initial Study (IS-95-~/FA-700 /DQ-305)
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR-_/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-_/FB--/DP)
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC- _ERR--1
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- IDQ- )
.Tbe Project consists of: Construction of fifteen 2,000 sq. ft.
ranch style houses.
Location:
142 Del Mar Avenue
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 7-10-95
.
=z..t..._
...... -.
.
c.V G~
6.\Qcil~
M-cu.....cLv
aNCQJ; Vvc..,
-- .......
C H U L A V I S TAP 0 L ICE D E PAR T MEN T
C RIM E P R E.~ E ~T ION UN I T
?l~, Review Recommendations
DAT3:
July 5, 1996
!:" .J . --.--
- "" ~' .; ~,~ ,1_....
'- -~.
FROI'1:
PL.!;;\I" ";'Ir,
Barbara Reid,. ...Jill-vi==tal ".. ,,-'
CAM Brookover~nd Captai~~ithers, Investigations
SCPS Mary Jane Diosda~~~ime Prevention Unit
,73
Initial Study 96~ 142 Del Mar Av, Vista Del Mar
TO:
VIA:
PROJECT:
-XX- The Police Department and the Crime Prevention Unit will be
able to provide an adequate level of service for this
proposed site_
xx . There is no expected increase in personnel or equipment in
order to maintain Police Department services.
-XX- Please forward additional information regarding this project
to the Crime Prevention Unit.
Estimated response time for Priority 1 calls to this project:
Grid: 42 2.62%- of the CFS within P-1 have an A.R.T. of 6:30
Estimated response time for Priority 2 calls to this project:
Grid: 42 27.87% of the CFS within P-2 have an A.R.T. of 7:05
CO!T1TT1pnr",' From.. 07/0:Lj 95. tD_ 06/01/9.6. there. were.. 1276. Calls .For
Service within this Reporting District. 360 of these calls
resulted-in.ccime..cases.
Note: The above listed resRonse times are sligptly. above the
recommended response thresholds.
The highest number of CFS fall under 'disturbing
'miscellaneous' (non-crime) requests for service.
second with 200 crime reports.
Access to this project site is the greatest concern. Because it
is somewhat isolated from regular beat thoroughfares,. this site
should be well secured to prevent theft of construction
materials. A security evaluation is available upon request for
the project site. Contact the Crime Prevention Unit at 691-5187
for more information.
the peace' and
Burglary ranked
Tha~~ you for the opportunity to have input into this project.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me any
time. aL. 691~.5127 .
cc:
CPTED
PD/cpu 11/95
~ 31-
ROUTING FORM
DATE: June 26, 1996
-
,",
/
f(Zfi~ :
~T6J
SUBJECT:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Anne Moore, Asst city Attorney (Draft Neg Dec & EIR)
Doug Perry, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
crime Prevention, Police Department (M.J. Diosdado)
community Development, Redev. Economic Dev. only
Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator
current Planning
Dup.ne Bazzel, Advance Planning
Garry williams, Landscape Planner
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
LAFCO (IS/Draft EIR - If annexation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project Tracking Log (route form only)
Doug Reid (Community Development Projects)
Other
Barbara Reid
Environmental section
Application for Initial Study (IS-96~~FA-700 /DQ-306)
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR- _/FB-_/DQ )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- _/FB- _/DP )
Review of Environmental Review Record (FC- _ERR-----l
Review of Draft Neg Dec (IS- /FA- /DQ- )
.The Project consists of: Construction of fifteen 2,000 sq. ft.
ranch style houses.
Location:
142 Del Mar Avenue
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have
by 7-10-96
Jf-f61l..L PDtS AJ 0 -r ,*PI'Ek><-]"b 13.E /J-/J'( 6. CIJ ~ PLfl-r..l / :5:> d.t-S /,.J I'm 7J+t $
p~ f''wPD ~"I\ -:2 ;J, I
V. r./~)--'Z ,/2-/ "j C-
--
Cor. N'o / ~- :;; '.- =<3
~'"' ..-,....-"
LA1''DSCAPE PLA1'1\JNG
, I' ,(; f
A. D~s the project affw native plant communities? f1,(}.{JJ/0,)/'0 \devLTltlbX M CUt
If so, please id::ntify which communities. ./"
/
~
B, Please identify any imponant or highly visible hillsides on or adjacent to the projw,
17;. P I Jv'fLJ -tv, (/{' ~ , .r00 M) ) -& (ht/"cJ M~ ..' n tAofll }-r'k--
, , UI' ' 0 / '
ilD.A-f .-/ . ./
What landscapin)j conditions (if any) will be required for these hillsides?
(~-rt{CI. ~
'o.v:f 0 /1') ,
0/
C. Of the total area to be developed. how much, and which areas are expected to be replanted
and require suppkmental watering? (Pkase describe). Ny/ II j5[1 t1foov-c:. .
/
/
./
E.
Are. there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project?
~
~
/
/
/
/
ri\i
City Landscape Architect or Representative
-J;)t-'i 1b,ICf1iP
, [
Date
WPC,r.=IoI!N'U>o"''III~02HJ (Rd. 1021.93) (Rd. 1020.9'3)
Plge 8
-39-
Sweetvvater Union High School District
Administration Center
1130 Fifth Avenue
Chula Vista} California 91911-2896
(619) 691-5553
! ; ~ .
.......- -
:~::s
Division of Planning and Facilities -
July 2, 1996
Ms. Barbara Reid
City of ChuIa Vista
Environmental Section
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Reid:
Re: IS-96-.J3" d- 3
The above project will have an impact on the Sweetwater Union High School District.
Payment of school fees will be required pursuant to Government Code No. 65995
(Developer Fees) prior to issuance of building permit.
Thomas Silva
Director of Planning
TS/ml
-L/D-
BOARD OF EDUCATION July 9, 1996
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D.
SHAgON GILES
PATRKXA JJD~
PAMELA B. SMfTH
MIKE A S?EYRER
SUPERINTENDENT
USIA S. GIL Ph.D.
CffiJLA y....:iTA ELEMENTARY SChJOL DISTRICT
84 K".ST "J" STREET . CHULA. \lSTA, CALIFORNL-\ 91910 . 619 425.9600
EACH CHILD IS lL"I IKDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
Ms. Barbara Reid
Environmental Section
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
('If 1
.... ~j:...., ..L
:.:.'':.'"'.:
RE: IS-96-33/ FA-700 / DQ-306
Applicant: Dan Irwin of DbI. D. Del Mar
Project: 15 SFD at 142 Del Mar Avenue
Dear Ms. Reid:
This is to advise you that the project proposed for 142 Del Mar Avenue is within the
Chula Vista Elementary School District which serves children from Kindergarten
through Grade 6. Rosebank School is the home school for this project.
District enrollment has been increasing at the rate of approximately 1 - 2 percent
over the past several years, and this is projected to continue. Permanent capacity
has been exceeded at many schools and temporary relocatable classrooms are
being utilized to accommodate increased enrollments. The District also buses
students outside their attendance areas, both to accommodate growth and assist in
achieving ethnic balance.
State law currently provides for a developer fee of $1.84 per square foot of
assessable area to assist in financing facilities needed to serve growth. The fee is
split between the two school districts with our District receiving
$ .81/sq. ft. and Sweetwater Union High School District (SUHSD) receiving $1.03/sq.
ft. This fee is assessed for new residential construction and additions/remodels of
over 500 square feet.
If you have any questions, please contact this office.
Sincerely,
~~
Lowell Billings
Assistant Superintendent for
Business Services & Support
LB:dp
cc: Tom Silva
Norman Ostapinski
c::t~Jrgres
- Ljl -
;Z e,berts
2:"; Nixon Place
::-:"ula Vista, CA 91910-1123
'c;ly 23,1996
Douglas Reid, Environmental Review Coordi.rlator
City of Chula Vista
J
l.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912
[.~ar 1v1.r. Reid:
; ~_"Il very concerned about the Vista Del Mar project (15-96-23) which is proposed for my
-.::ighborhood. The project location is very near to my horne, and I believe the proposed
'.'3~ wouJd significantly alter my neighborhoDd. Please assure that an 'envll"orunental
:T;nct report is completed which addresses the following issues:
15! Community Character
11 Visual Impacts
II Land Use/Open Space/Sensitive Species
C Traffic
. Noise
111 Construction Noise
Ii: Construction Traffic
G Property Values
II Impacts to Public Facilities, including Schools
II: Crime/Vandalism
: 'i~?se send me notification of any meetIDgs and copies of any environmental
:kcuments which are produced for this project.
~~i.;1Q~ely, /II
..<t4)&~
:'c.ula T. RObert!t:A"""".........'
-LjJ--
SURVEY u. MAPPING
837 Ea.st J Street, Chu,l.a, Yista, CA 91910
Tel.eph071.l! (619)421-3042
,/
.'/
) 'i//./ ,J;
/; I(?I'-
~Cr
/~J.':?
"
HYDROLOGY ANALYSIS
FOR
VISTA DEL MAR (CV TRACT NO. 96-06)
IN
(
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
/ .
/
IN 0073TM
AUGUST 14, 1996
c~
HOSSEIN ZOMORRODI, RCE 43235
- 1/3 ~
8 -(+-7y
DATE
<D
m z-;
:::- ;:-<.
=
""
" .-
i~ ;;.~
'qo.c.
0) ~~ .:: i~
;:.'~<
~ C).r r~n
_ tJ :~- ttr
~.:f:
"'J:ICrJ)
...::::-- ~-
""
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. SITE DESCRIPTION
2. HYDROLOGY DESIGN MODEL
3. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS.......................APPENDIX A
4. HYDROLOGY MAPS.............................. . APPENDIX B
5. TABLES AND CHARTS........................... .APPENDIX C
- '-I Lf-
<
1. SITE DESCRIPTION
EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS CONSIST OF HILLY SLOPES ( AVE.. 15%)
AWAY FROM DEL MAR AVENUE. RUNOFF IS TO THE WESTERLY PROPERTY
LINE WHERE IT IS INTERCEPTED BY A CONCRETE DITCH AND
DIRECTED TO THE NORTHWEST PROPERTY CORNER THEN WESTERLY
TOWARDS EXIST DIRT ROAD (NORTH 3RD AVENUE). THE CONCRETE
DITCH ENDING AT' THE EASTERLY EDGE OF 3RD AVENUE INTO ROCK
RIP RAP.
THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT INCREASE THE RUNOFF;
HOWEVER A DETENTION BASIN IS DESIGNED TO STORE APPROXIMATELY
25% OF THE 100 YR RUNOFF WHICH WILL ALSO REDUCE THE RUNOFF
VELOCITY TO 1.7 FPS.
CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN DURING CONSTRUCTION OF DRAINAGE
FACILITIES TO INSURE THAT ALL RUNOFF ENDING AT 3RD AVENUE
WILL BE DIRECTED NORTHERLY TO ELIMINATE
3RD AVENUE TO THE EXISTING MOBlr(PARK~
~! /'
: .','
:. 1.,\ ~.
ANY WATER
.\....
).
(
CROSSING
--
- - -- -
\ i ~ -':~ '
: --" .
:;. .r,
:~>.
. .J;
~
"
*; /
."' ,
>
" ~,
tj-r-
<
,
.,
. '....~J
" - .)
./ f. .' ..
I .-
......1 ....
;-....
,- ';
1. lI\'lJROLOGY lJESIGN MODELS
A. DF:S/GN MITI/ODS .
L
THE R/ITIO!JAL METIlOD IS USED IN TIllS HYDROLOGY STIJDY; THE RATIONAL FO~ IS AS
FOLLOW:;: . i
. ,
C) = CIA. WIIERE : Q= PEAK DISC;HARGE IN CUBIC FEET/SECOND .
c.: = IWNOFE c.:OEFFJCIENT (DIMENSIONLESS)
I = RAINFALl. INTENSITY rN INCHESIHOUR
A = TRmUT AR Y DRAINAGE AREA IN ACRES
'I ACRE IIJCIIESIIIOI.JIl = I.OOR CUBIC FEET/SEC
THE OVE!lLAND FI.OW Wi.ETHOD IS ALSO USED IN TillS HYDROLOG Y STIJDY; THE OVERLAND FLOW
FORMUI.A IS AS 1'01.1.0\\'5: "
..
T,,~II S(I.I.C)\I.)jJ/\S%)'~
C = RUNDFF COEFFICIENT
L ~ C JVEI<LANI) "fRA VEL DIST,\NCE IN FEET
S ~ 51.[>1'1: IIJ pERc.:l?I.JT
T,," TIME II, j,IINlITES
B. !.2FS/,;,v nUT/U1l.1
C.
I
I
i
<\u_~
i
i
1
I
i
,
- 11.\IN FAI.L INTENSITY PER CtJUNTY OF SAN DlEGO 199311YDROLOGY
!
J
!
- Fl11'QtJENCY, \00 YEAR STOl,M.
- 1.Al-iJ) I'sf; PElt SPECIFIC PLAN.
TJP'EJjF,v("S
i.
. ,
DRAINAGE DESIGN MANUAL' APR.
1994.
CITY OF SAN DIEGO,
i
HANDnOOr: or HYDRAULICS B~ fiRATER & KING, SIXTH EDITION.
,
,
. ,
CITY OF SAN DIEGO 1995 REGIONAL STANDARD DRAWING.
'; !
i
I
tjh~
;
I
,I
.,
~
\....
'DESIGN MANUAL
I
[
j
I
APPENDIX A
(3. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS)
- L(1-
" "Y~f0!,;~:;8..~.:~r..(~"" ,:'~CJB~~0:~'
. CHKD.I!!Y -P:A'Ti:: -=-~ -. -.- .
"... .
" '~Hn:TNo.-L.."" .of
". JOB NO.
...,
"
.-- . ..-.
--~-.--' -_._~-.
. . .' ,'. ~ . , . . . .
'--". ''''":~''--'':''''-.~' ----:-- '-'-=---~-"---,-: ..",,::'---' --:-- -'-. -_...~--.....--<-
-.. - .~--.._---. ... .:-.._----~----;-----...._-;. .._--~;..:..;"--~~._~~-_.
_,_ .... . .. ---7::":~""'-:' - .:..... .- ..-~= .-..:~.;~ :h~'~~ '_'_"~~,:.';.-::'" .~_. . .:.
,': "._'. '.'. ~_".-._-;-. f'.-: - :-. -_, _:- .,',',' ,....,
- ..... .." -.-'.-..,. ~ -._... .t-'.-- . ".-' ."-.
..-..
. .- - -' . -
-;.---
. .---' .
_u
- - --.-'
. .~- ;.':'"',.- "7
. - .. -,..
. '.'.. 'n
..:-::~~-~- -: ~-;.~~~'':-':'-
,t;;i!~'" tJ.1:,;;: torJv'riwtJ,: ~,~.t::.:::-,~,::
.'-.
." -. -....
"..--- -.-.".
.. ./
.. .
. .... .....
.:.; ---.,;-.;...;,. ~-.::-!..-_.
'flVNoff ~ ,{l' '.'JrJ.'(JJP-iJa..:'
..' - -.". - .-
:A.=';.{6~ N-
-, . ". .
,.&-'0.15 "~~ Sl..O~~1 !-\Iu-r
.,bl-\- = '1\5-fl' = ~ .50
I.- ""eO' :; O,/~5 ~i
.....;.
\-'
"
..
'.
,
,
. '. .. ~ o.~'65'
&oJII.'{ (D.ff'S)]
'70 .'70
:.v '!:IOO. 3,0 ........ J Iv-'
-. -----..
t;t,-- :;
<: 4.'1
ApD b. -:: (? J!')t/\
Q :; .O.lsi'3.ox?C-Sz..6.1.
_ 100
Cf7
D~vr:;,U)fGP
LOtJ DITtO,.} :
"
. ~ . ... . -
. .----
;t.vt-JOFf (J-
f-,-:;. 3.'2.-j1
,c:-O.(6, F--t
. .,
. bl1:=:'j(.5~~~.S,:.'33
CUL--()C"';,A.c-:' ilJu:r.
k-'(5j
.. -- ...
..-..-- ...
- . -.-- --
".- - - - . -
"-'- - -
. --- ----- -- . '.
_' _u.._ ."- __' ~ __~_.:.. . ~
- - -'.- -,
._-<-.- - . .'..-.
._- ..---. _ ----
. .. .. . .'
" ._ _ ...._.n. _--;-__: __".---;..'_~_'_:"'-"',_ _' .', .:.... . .. _ ___..' ",
, . .
. .-.
.,,"
. ,
. . '." .
n" ..._ ..'."'_' _ ".__ _", __"_._. .~_... _".
, ..
. .,....
. . - -:--- -", - --.. .-.-.- . -.-.- .
_. ,,_.u.
"..- -- .--..
.. .-._.-.
..- -'- - - ... -..
_~:'~' q(;;,~'::?'-~,~:ifi- ~'~~':~-i.~~.~'.-J~~.: :,0"~: ::~;;~~~~~.;~C~j~~:~',:-.__~:- .~.~~:-::::::~' ::'," "
-. -.
.. ..- -.- --- '- --'-r-
':" ~ - - ~ ~~-:--_..-._:-- - :-' .-
..
-- .,....
- _..----
-.. ..--.:-.---..;---: - "-,' - -- .:.._..:.~...;- ..;-~ -
.. _.
,.
-.,. .... _.' .-- -~--_:....._~..._--_..
._ .... ___u__'__'
. .. . -
. . ,
'.-. --_. - .....-.-.. ..-- ------.--.
, . . .:
. -~..- -.--. _.. ..,.. ... ---
. - - - ..... -..
.... _..-.
'. , .
.-..- -.----- .' ..--'
- - -. . .,_. ._--_. -. ---- ----.- ---.-.
- ..--- .
_.__"...L.-~ ____. _ _ _. ._.._ __.. __._..
-.---- .... ;,"'1' :-:--:-.,-;....""1',=--==-c....=;~=-j~..~..-_~.:.~..:~:...:_-:___._.:
~~,[t}e; :j:~n~~~~lruIG-~~~8~~.::~~rGl~~i;~t~
~...L1..L!J ',: ....:,!+t+~l ,. '4W:+,., 'L' . >,' ,4'1 : ~ ; " . I ., I.) ::.fTfh :.t::!~1 ,.! (; I UJ__~_
:-' ,. ,-" ", ,to ,...,.. .,;T.T .,,,.~, .' ~.' . .; .'L h.. ,.,. ".-1,.,3 I;:iffi~! I! ~1'--+-l';"
-G1:1J~.:.;:-....hl..!....'.~..,-.i..l-'1.!:..a#.:... .....1..... "i. 1-. :'t-.~ :-l._....~;.: .-JFI tt:.J~"!.~i"""'-:
-r,~ ! !"O 1 ? ;: j t-! 1 ::.f'1 ! .~..~J.I ~l "! _.._..1 -.r- 0 t ,. ~~7..:.!....;' "t ,f. ,~.. ".'~ ~ ; ~~.,->~.; : +~~__:
~._---~---~ ---~
CHKD.1!Y_~DATE- - ~.
-
~. :;.
- -~..Joe NO_'
- -- . ~
-- - - -- -
- .- - -
. .
- -. -,- ---.
._- .-~_.- - -- -- .-. -
..-.- -- -
- .
~~j~ ~E5::i;~t;.<~7~;i~)';:~" >--. .._-
-.'. '-.-':---" .-.:-~:::'~--,_: ;-~.:.. ~-~:
c ~T;.Iv~_'::_~:r ~~?~
:-~-~~M7~ '.~-;~Of--" /,-t.
-- -.
--. - ~..- - .
...-....
~.. ... - ,...
- .-- . ---
.---
-=
.
....: ~ a. ' :
.
'"1"
: ~o M.ObfM 7. Q/~ = 'I~ ~
1/:=
i /l,i
I
,:: '4.0
...
: 1JsG . 'I Fe
A
<: ". . ,. I
Of!- . ~ I J...; ?
f<,c.f f (tG
'''-:'/;;-~'
t:,1-t~5g5o
. ~.~ Jo b/~-'
4'3 -:. 15".5
.. - - --'-
.ur #-iT'( .OF I ~/ (LC( 'a_ {o ~/.
- -."-' ._-,... ."'- - _;.c . --: . -' tI; .... ,/z.
() .~ !.f"~(; { /,{(/7) (o.nS) (O,(Q)
u.r ~.~/~'
-:= '3? crs :; 7' err
" ()j::
PCfTt-\-
(Jf..fLi>vJ L f2:e:F~
!t.oJ&~ H+-tJO O'DoI<:")
",:' ... ..
..... :..:.:.it-- ~".:';-Q ^::. .7 ,0 .~..o .0/ '3 ,=' 0'-0 '11
. :-:-"':"_:..i..::~'J B(:J ," {(",-::='~; .: '6Ij {: -:.. If."
.:....-: :,<:_~:'-~~_::F~:'~;::-":.::...ft:~1!'~,o:roJ; - --... .. -,.' ..._. ,_.' . :_m._
.. . __. . _ _. ','F_,'_' _ ,..h. .- ... .-- . -..-..... - ..-. .-- '.'. . . .--."-
,_'__" __--=.._~_______.;....;.....-. .._~._ _.______...-... '.'." .-~ -_..- -'1. . ~ .-. ....-- ,-'. ---_.--.,
:. ...:'.-:~.:.:~/d :)).~I ......-::?-":: 6,-';{ ~\:5.':. .:0,4(,'-. ":~i-\ :Ol~: '-fio~. ...-'
..--.--.--. -~.-----,.---
...---.-., ..
- - ..~- -.--
.... -'.-
.:'.~...~~ict'-~':~;-io~1-4"~':::'- ,~
. ..-_. .-:.-".-'";:"' .._~--_.'-:..-:-~ ".-:-"--':"-'~
_:~ ~:.:.6.'~~:o..:~7tJ/t;).~:~ ~'t~~.' ~f -':, '.: :,n... ..'
. " . oJ ~ 7~ :..~...- :(1; . .~. '." ~ ; , . .
..~ __..__~ . ._ .. . ~ +c. -.. --- \ ,I........ ~-- -. .n_~' . - - - .. - ........ ..
. . . ,-- ~ . - .- .....~i-:-.._._.:-.-.':"...._-:-:-:-".:-: _._+~-:-:.;...-'..
.,:~:c;.:h#~:::_t{f.;d~.t~::-;".~f;-:~J=~~\ittt.t:~i:n~~~ffr:-:-~'~~;,:~:=-~':!.:;_-:-:-.:l~ T~.:::': -.. : ..
,-,.: ;; :. ;"9.~~-:-:-"o.r;:i ,;,-fP;~'~!ft.,.;.{~"j:;T.~~~E!.,.l ; L! . , , I ;.4+b.,.~-:-:,;-,,:-,...,.,....--;-;'T-;7;r:::-'-----:'~-
li~_~I:\:;.1~;"~11~~~~}~j;~'ht';:;'li:~;:+~~:~ y+r: I_~!,; ~~+@:f~~*?ftL:t~
J....,to;~L~,-,..~" ".J '.X. J"~""" ."." . iT. . ., .... ..,. .'-'... ,.,., , , ..; ~ ;.... I., ," ""'J ,_t..,.:-.,: ". ~ J :......t...:_
:.1.: ~1:I:ll:D~:~_~..:t;;,';\t' .1'~ '=t-~+i' - ~..J.':'\ .,-' .-\ .~ ~. 0 I-'~': I ;:; - ;-';'''J'::'' ~'~..L
.';:".~Li.l:-'.i1':.;o:,~...J~~?F"~.i'7~~z.a1l.;:::WCi" _.1 .J "-;;..,=..~LJ- ..I'i'" f:".:...:...:......L
,-r;:::: .~~.L;:. ....~... ;.J"'l.~(.._l.. I '. ."._ ." f ~,. 1 1 l.oj . -. ." '-/~' ;'.....---.......--. "I'. I I"",!'I , ' . ~ . . I .
:-:-r::~:...~. ,_._'..:~-~ :,: -:'. ~~:-:-~..:~~ ,,' ;.' :.,~.-,:-~ ~: ~ ......_~ ;~:~~ ~_,_;~.~_1 '_:~_:-L~_L..:,l_~~'-~~~-
.. .- - ---
Q}~...,
...
....
. .--..- .
-
_,.". .._ _ _. n
:_-.~H~NO.~OF~
:-JDe: NO....
'CHKD.!J"Y _
?_.....~=--.:..:.--
'CATE
5l' '-cr
BY
"... -'-. ---
-_.-..
-'. . . -- --:..--
---
----
. .
- --".--.. -.-
c.'-.,..... '_'_....
",..r _...._.___.__. _.."
- -. . .-
_.. _. -___ro"
. ..
- --. ~:-.'...-.'-;
_d. ._.
.- - . ..
.. .
. . . .
.....- .---, .-.....----
. . ~ '.-.'. .
.,.. - ,- ;-'-,'-' ..~,.:.- ---
'.'---".
; (LU,J ~Ff _ {}. . IJ vJ .(j)~IJbfZ-. ..
AeJprTJOrJ,t1r:...:. A~'(5U>'~)
.. .
...... ---
.-.
-~.' ,--.
. '--" --"
"- O:~~ A~_@
.....
.
.'..Q ...;' 0:317.5)( 0 .0l;; ?<.? 'Z-
__. ..Ioe .. . '.
-1bTM.-Q .,.-..1 ""\: Q.7 :-~~'1.1
~ O.T Cf"S.
l,.fS .( e.'2 C-J-:<;
otfJ01NC-f-Gf..."5"G. IN P4rJofF DII~ 10
. . - J.
De/ ~ r..o r", €Vf
. ,
;. .~.
j
r...., ".:'j
.... "...., " .
/ ..--,,-- t 1.."__ ".~ ..-.(;,---
~~,- -'-.-:
.
~- ~ --
;~::.c.
L..
....PGT~rJT(O,.J
'B /r~1!J
IJ --~~:~:rJ __
_ -,;.,. (/
j. _'_....~_,..;.-..-:-.-
\.,.'..--.
~
!,4'w fi.OoJ f'ri't
t;" fVt. e. (J.r;,'(.
e.
.
VO/..()Me:.
OF
... "2.... .
qiP;) ~(g) X?..q
. '2--
570 (LA. 6C- '.
.....:-
v'- ~
. J._ J. .
....:..~; -~. ;
.c:..)
-~
---
j._'.,--~'~"
.= 7(0. .q=
. ..~.......- .:.1-'.
,-.-- :../.....:
;.........
,3
..........
. >"
'-.....
. ...,.
.: ~.-=-.
.-_....
Q -= . . vo./I : . .
S1'~~ /(.37 c.p "Go
. ~;../>....-
-~,,,",,,.
......,:~., _.('J '.'.
//
, .
.' J_
\....../~ ,
. I !..-\
'/l -
J-.i":;.
[.;..;:/
,'-.,-..,
.~
~~
'-
_.... __ .-_0- ...
:~
/.
...~/.._..:.....:.. .
I . .0..
. . '. --.-. -",..,-,..._, --.-.
..tf'.~..tf.r1 (I,,..
~?;:lJ~ =' i:0?
:=---:';:::.":';:-n)T:':-4;'7~ [,0..:.:'; .:. .~..
'. , ~ .~:"=';:-~'. :j.~~;_~-~".~~_~:~.~'I~-~~ ~. :_':~-' .~-:
---:~.~:~3!l?~~!-;?;~/fX:<.::. '..
~. 0 . -
. '.;_~~~;f~^,:-fAf'~'-:i::': ;':'.:
. -::t,~..~y'~ ':j~~'~~11>::'::':':.: .:: . . - .~.~, 4'i,o
. ,<. ::. ::.c~ .:. .::,>::~_;.:-"'--'.:.", ~._. ,"/" :::. 'I:.. <. ) ~__ ,<.~s.."': .._ .:.:: :':::';:. ....
-o~=..-~':',L~~~~){Oo.I?7~>-l o,t.o) r'J.~,.' .,/ ~...-/:t.:-J.>.. '.--:;.l-;..
i~r~11~~1~~~.~ii;0l1Th:~~i~~~~
:LJH-J.=F: ;;-1::. ":n'i':';':':":L,cTi+t':.~lf:;'-~ c~.:s--o.:...:. .~ml"~ 1 ;~~.; f!:7++tffi~~:~:'~:',-~ /f~ ':.~~ .~
~ ~j,~..:ol .,~ 11~,1.{."F ')X~_-L-J.~.:r..m':.L~.t.Lj;,:~j: 'P' ' f"":;r-'-';"~-;----" ,""':JUl' I. ~.: .:..:L~'\'j '-;.3:''': .{~.i,-",~,",'J ..J .", ..!j ~ 1Ti:t~
----=!.",h! I~",-. .i._-,,~ ~1~ "h,,~-r"O J' "\.1 ~ ,..... '. +-'. . t '__ _'" ,'j '71:..': _~ '_;':': ~ .-: ,.:.; j--,,--l~' ~'I.I....;.
r
. . .
. --.-. "_.' ,---' '-.. .~.. .-
. .. . ~O' -::_-:'~:': .t~-:"--~::
... .. - ~ .-..-: ..._.
. . . .
.0
. '-
BY-
._t:'A.-:-'E_----=---=-
'_~:.JB_f:_0
~_a..nL~i M_.~r..x: ~
CHKD.eY___DATE~~
""
~J<:)ItNO.
..-. -~.
- '
-
~
'-:-~~~ ~.'; - - :.~ -:.:.~-~.:-
..
,
. . ~.
YJclF-
FLDW
h.
..---..
~'" t L-
- ";/~
11 ~
"
4U2..:....
~~..,o
--- -
...,~
.,
1""p.T
I
1+:.0,4<:.
-::=r C--;.1...C:;~
. '?J;
'. Q .1-."5C; #0 .,:.[0.45)
..01VG
.'&L-~fl.oo
U, 4'7.0"
r
>>'~'
. . .~~ O.~.
~
1 . ".'
-:.1.1
CFS.
c;'.
\
GL-' 44-.50
Fww
Vf:/-04T '(
V:
/.1
-.
{,I
Ffs.
f~rJT
10.,::O.tt;
--_...
("-If' f-AP
U~fE'
NO.;'
f!:AG/4 fJet:>
T..,. {).~'
( ..
-. ..-.
.
.-.
-- ._".._- -_..
I.
v
..........-"~
-~.
,-
-......-<......
. :../-.
.1-.,' .'~_
, .
-,....,'.' -
. '__'._ t:
.,
. ,- J \
-l r"-<f. i/;.i
._'---~
",=1"1"
\ .
\,/ /--'
~
:"-'~' -'
. .
,-
,
." -
..-
.-------
- - --'
.. --. - .
-' . -"
.... ..J.~;::-::::~-.~ :._:~.,~~-_-=_~_:..." --
"-..
:--, """"';'"":- :'--;":-~. ~
..... -~ -:' ~.,;-~;
.r:
. . . .
->-.p" ... ---.
.-./~~--:j
-,.J -,..
L::..-<')..:.., -e":._ ~
.--:!:..:.-;_.:: -':-~
.-J_ .
,-:..~~ .----.-.:-..
. .:'
. -
'/ -,-- - ...----,--.-_.._--
, ..J ':,' _....-.....-
. -~'2..':_::~;_'''' .--c..,:"-":"':"! _:...;.
.......k. _:_;~_:-._._ _.p'
._'.' ._.h.....~...i..... ._____.__.
__v ,'-c -t._..:-.
, \.,1 p/...-'...._ '.....;_ .'.
r .- . ,- \ ..'
... ..
--. -.... .--' ~...'
-,
1...............3)"
..- - ,-....
......:::~.-.\.... r
.- \ .
.-:~ .' -- ~
.--
'.../~::'jJ.
~-:-:j
. i.
..
-.
-..-..
"-'
.-
--.--'-
......-..
.'-\
- ..
,........
/.j-
.s. ..
,
~
5.~: ~- . ..
/
.J'._n.'-. . _._' .~n__n.._..
......~-<: -' '....~.'_........:.... ...:. .
......-....-....:.......-,-....
'L'
.. -'. ..-
~
L :,
~,~...~j....,
1-,.
_/!. ~./"'!...
...'
,:;:.
-. -. ,-- -
. ,-
.... ....
,"'---'\'-:"-..
:.l
(;. >:.-\.'-:'"
, - f ..-.
._L. f.
'~,''-.'; '.._(.~:r
.-. .... -
i.
.1_,
, .
/. _i_:""
--.
_._-_.~..
"
'-
")
r
. -\
VJ____...
_. ....-.. ..
....y.~
- ... _.-
.-:-i r-
.. ,- .
....-', ,.-,\
-~-:::.-:,,:
:---:.'2.;~ ~ ':.-::<
-..
: :.{:..:", ..' i:
} '.
~:,)~.~,.._':/~~~~
.....____.. . ..~--=-;:...:;,,-... ___-:_n__
. _... n.
..
"! :
1-
; i:
j'I..I.
-..
<-
-,
"
..
..t.
,.
.'.
-.
......
"!
,
"I..~.'~ .{ .i .;
:_"1" I 'i..
...,..,
--
APPENDIX B
(4. HYDROLOGY MAPS)
.
- Sd
<
I I
II ~
,II ;
"
il ' ~
or: II
~ ~
II ~
\jrl \ {1 j/\ \(/, 1,,-
, \ T J ,\ )
'r -----'---r- __.J--,' ---/!
! H
~~ i:
,..- i >.
I'
( \ l I I
i I "Ii' ~ ,----\(-
I 1-- -
I
" 7 .'
- 'r
i / r
0~/1
"
-
,+FZ,..t;
~'
-
;;
~"...-.co.
-~
/
,?'l '
r"8.J
\ {\, ",I
." :. ,'\ ~I'
\ ',\ '\1
-- \ \,'
\, '- ,i',r,
...1 '-. '\..\1
~, \' ~ "
....:: \. \/ I'
~ . .\ .f
~J< ;~>~:
...." ,.;: .
,', " '\
.......-,
-.
\
\
i
~
I
I
/
/
1'-
:;::/
'~
.
-
- _/'
" .,
..-------
,~
--_...-
~
-<.
I
I
I
_r"1 I
1'.1/
.---------
\
----...----
TIJIt.' I
.~._...,;..~.
< - S3-
C"
./
....
.,.,.:t>L"
.:.i
.:
\.
"
c
-\~
'.
I
I
\
I
.
II
/'
"
J
I,
'5
II~
I r:
I :1:
; ["
/
I
/
I
I
I
~
.~L
:3 .tC.~~.Ll S
---------'----oj
I
~..
I'
,
.
/' ',j
"
.,
,
-"",,,--
','
\. . .~. .
/
"
,
~ !.-,/
..'1
"
v
;-_ __ ___-J_-:
,
,
,
I
i
L \(____ :1-_--,'--- .
I - I
I \
\
"!
..
..
~
/_i----Y-/
-, ,
,,--""'-
/ \
II
,
...
..
..,
"
<,-
\
,
I
j'
~g
~i
s
5
u
t~
'!!~
"-
....
H. .6"Ot.L.I N
-------'
~~-L
j-
. -".. "'::~.
. -
.~.
'L' ....:
...~vr
.. .. ~_: .
... ~ l'
'.'
, I
. .,', '.J u.I
"1 ..J
.~ ~.1' a.
.. "I 0
::./p 1-' (j)
. .'1' ?
" "':<':-): ,; '6:.
.,P .' , r-
".( "1 .,' '
;' ....t.... ~, '
i
APPENDIX C
(5. TABLES & CHARTS)
- sT-
E.
I
storm utilizing available head ~th!out causing substantial property
damage, except that where a sump condition exists a~d excess runoff
has no alternate route, special 'design shall be required for the
protection of property. ' i ! t
I i'l
Hyd ro logy. , 1 r
Ij-_ I
1. Runoff quantities as set for;th or derived f.rom the 'report
prepared by lawrence, Fogg, Florer and Smith, ti;tled "A Special
Study of Storm D!"ain Facilities" .on file in 'the office of the
Clty Engineer may be used in: the design of drainage facilities
in Chula Vista. " ! .
; -f i
2.
For small drainage basins, (not exceeding 200
following method for determining runoff, based on
Formula (Q = CiA), may be used.; :
. 1 ~.
a. Coefficient of Runoff: 'C. (Consider Probable Development.
Use average of the following values.)
i
acres) the
the Rational
,
Paved Surface 0.90
Corrmerci al Area 0.85
Dense Residential (R-2, R-3) 0.75
Normal Residential (R-l) 0.65
Suburban Property (RE) 0.55
Barren Slopes Steep 0.80
" " - Hilly 0.75
" " - Rolling 0.70
" " - Flat 0.65
Vegetated Slopes - Steep ... 0.60
" ".- Hilly ! 0.55
" "- Roll ingJ 0.50
" "- F 1 at' I 0.45
Farm land : 0.35
Parks, Golf Courses I j r 0.30
NOTES: Steep = Steep, :r~gged terrain withl average slop~s
generally above 30%. (See Section II B8e
for slope determination.) I:' !
Hilly = Hiily ~e1r' rain with average slopes of 10%
to 3o%~ ' 'j !
. I
. j j I i
Rolling = Rolllng terrain withave:rage slopes or..
~% ti fO%, !
Flat = Relatively flat land, with ~verage slope~
of 0% tel 5%. !
.r I :
! , I
-70-. I!
!
i
i
-/ ' I.
s' (0 ~~LU
~
.
,
.'"
I
-, l. ",..'_"1' __,.. 1 "'''''I'' 'I."~':,:'I' ..'1...:1',. 11'i'I"I' , ',., .....I..'..'..1.1.."...I'..'j...I""'I. I.........,..
~I: . n_ I..;. ::I::::~'.. .I.! .1' ::;:: ::.:1::1: J ::;:::: .1:. ;:: ~:I :":::."::,::
o:-C-'-- .. "'. 'I :::\., i!:'j;::il' iflRi: 'li'I'I'V I'~ ..ii:;:'il~"I::;::i,,:I:JL!.rI" ':;;,; 1:;'0::::1"
. 't .'-" ,". .. ...t......,.... i::i!...f1. 1-,. 11........11.1. ......,!.!...u:llr.... -I .. ...:1......
tJ G'- -.. ..~.. -'. ~:; ":~::~:::::~I':: :'I::i:jiE:I:::i'I::::I::!'jl! i !;~!;;:I:'I:: '11]1:1": II j j'~j-~l :.;:.i;:;::I:::I'I::!I~:i::~:~lH~l:j::I::r.I:::!I:::1:"1:1-: :~:
" . ..... .".. ................ ..,....I....."..., ,," ".". ",1, I...",..... .":I~.'".III..,,,,,.I.,.._II",,,......i]......,,
" :1. '.:. . ":1:::': :';::::::::'j:'::I;I:. :~;'I::::"':II;;'I:I'1"l!:I: I;:! 1111~'; 1.:i:j:H'j'~I'l'lgf'1'I-tl'I'n1)111'1'1r.i1m"-ili;'1'1:'I:\:~':!:":~:::::::::
,1.[. .... ...... ....."....... ......" ,'iI "1',1.""..,,1. .1'1 :::, "'~ 'I'" ,1l.:J. ~ '1"1' ,1":;111...,1,;, '1""."..-....1..
'1 .J.... ......... ........... ..-- "'. .... ..II.II.I"II!"', ;1.. ..... .,- ,.1........... i..;.,n 't-tll ( ~UJ t-H.',,! ,........t-...-......
6TJ;.~~~ _;'. ; ~ ~ ~ .~:: ~ ~ ~1:: ~~:;i~;;(~~~~~~;! ;; ; 11; ~ ~! ;~~;i ;;!~I~::~~;;;;I : ~ ~~~.I ~; ~: l; !~: 1 ~W~~ : .!.;~i~T~~ ~ ~~ ~~ l~! ~ 1~1~~~H~i;~~~~~n ~'~!;!: 1\ ::~;:~~~~!;;~~~;;;~! p
,1".1::".' '-:,.<~;I1[,'",..",,,,,',L::JI,,!, "" "Idu'!,dL,,;'I;!,! ,I" ItUJ ,1_. I..I."";;~,J,, ~11i1!"llilliiii;:tbf,I,,,1 "",,,,,1,,,:;,:;, ""
"I::' "".. . ::.::.::i!,::",';:;;';;:::'il:,-H"I' U;:F~I'I.liJIlj';; II,' 11'1"': i ',~.i"!'f'fli"!.!.!~l'! 'i.i~ii'n:"'III':lllJfT' "ii j,f' ::'! :::':"~I::"
__I:'" i:i,::::i:::6:::::::::i:::::::~I:':::::~~:::;!s~;~;"":;;-*,II::Ili:;::;i't:::",..:.:,:,:' :.[W:.~: :~'!i~::~~~ :-u; i::: ::~:::::::'::I::::
: :r':::',:::i:":::''':I;::::::::.::i::::;:{:~:i1:I-::Ii,,;I"i'iS:''I, "'''''~ ;\~ il c::1tt'tt~11i:::ilfr: '...1111 ,;I,ri,i::;::- ;11 ,i!;::;:::;~= :-ii:
~:I'-r . m..., .1' ..;. :":':::;:::::::::::::::I'I~';~;:;j :I'i 1'1":4>"",':: 'S.: "II 1"'1 ~"...::!r.t ;"I.:-,-p:ri -::-:; ~I i PiJ:U . "It 11J I;~ill'p" :;n ::::'j::-" ::::
+::.:.:..:.. _::.:.:.:~ ::::::::::::::~~I:~::~1J_. .', ,IL::!:~":"':"~~I ;;:-.'~(-)_;. ..:j:1...... ilil' ion. ~:.tIlIJ. t:: :::::::: :~::;
l:t::;::::~:;::::::;j:::::::::,,,::::".:t-l.::1di t:11:i:!:~I:I".:JU ,;";.:1;: ~fi-~IR' ~i liP 1 1;1'11,'111111': :F.i '~-1IF.:"li.:::I:::::':::1
';:::::. :...;:'l.:::...~::::::::::~~::::!::H~~IJ:'I't:~;.I"'.~~I:In-:..:'i;-:"",, ~ '.~ I ..h.I;:i:iul! ,1I1!i:: f~ ,",.I::i..::::I.::::;::
3 H i <~': >< HHUnj::;j~1~~~fi~ :~ t~ ~iHi:1tl'~~~~,fI~ ~~ti. -4. ~ . :. ~ lUU Hi~llli :!!jiliii Hi' ii!! :~I~ jiB HH!!?gjpH
" ~ .:. ~ ~ ; : ..:~ ~ : ~;:; ~~~1 ;:: .:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+~~ ~~ ~~ ~:~;P~~~.t~! ~:;~ : ;:! ~~: ." ~.; : = ~ /f- d~i~:: :~:~~~~ r~1 ~!!! ~~~:~~~~ ~~~:~~ ~~~
,. ;j':':''-'1\j ","",' ;:::'''''::~::"';~'-'U-lii .-;;;'" i"Ir;;;;L,!.ff Ii:' :'::~I' ~.. No' .' t";o ~~ .,;,.I':"iI'ii!"-;i! 'i'lli:::,:," :::~:',j:='1
:,~f:~ :~ : ~ ~: ~:~~~i~: i~:'~:~~~~~~;e. ::'..:-ffi,~ ~;fu~,~!:I~i;IN,!~I:ci: .:.! !j!! IUI;., ",,; i:'; ~~~Jlf.' ~ j~: i~! ~'1'5 ~~~i~:}j~~
"I :'. . : :: :.: :. :.:.::.. ~ :::.:::::::::::...: ........._...1...:. .:-::n;.:...:...: ..:: .... 0.. ;:-s- :.;1 . .,.",.:.':;.. . ..I!I~.:::JIf~...... :::1 ::::1: ~ :::::=::I.:':'::!
~i~;~:-=-,:.:~~~~:~:::~~;;~~;~:~~i:~mg~l,jj;gji~ milt!:, 'ill.. =:;. : :!~~~:;;:":~:~:::::: ;:';~~HT!;~~J~f:rr'!:~mi.1
;, :".0'=''':: :.::~ =,~::::.:::::::::.':': gjt:::::;I1 (1.1 !'II ffi:j.t ~i :1'...., .,,, - ." . ~1 .:~t1ii" "f::<\: '::1::>< ::t: ::h :::::-. :r:~
; r:..:: ::-:::~: :.:::::: :::~~:::::,,-'::::. """.J:':!:: "I' ~.llf:' 2'~:! "- ~.. ..j r.t:! ,::,.-' !!:I~' 1:.. ':i. ';':::1;1;' ::::1 ::::'
;!.,......._.IJ.......~.....--..,......'''=m'- _..-11" nI11.~,1.,,, ..!,..-:;:..",..,...,..-;:;i,..-..X;........h_....1
'. :~: ~:.: .~ ;': ::. I::, :::.:::::::i!"-,: -;::;;t!F.'g;i:l. 'I;:n. ~~~Jll iHlliW mt p,:. ,";;:r' :. h :-i n-B Fi~1j:"I!::i1~:r~!=. ".:: ':);.j:~~""::~:;::-:::
~I :1::.::": :.:.:-":::I;:::::::'~::~:';;:: ~~~~.t;:1U~I~~ !!!! ~~I:I~ :fJ1 ~~: . ~ _~.I ~ ~.J ~;;.f.:I~i; !.. ~I: ~_:-i :;';~lffi..tl':' ::..: -':;::j
. .... .. . ..-.............-:-- ..-~J..T1r._l. ,.... '1' ,I H" .g' ',i' ...,...,.. L .r -; - ~n UI~' ~'L~~~ ."". ....~... ...
.'.. .. '!to.. ..~'..'-"';':':L:._;":""~~I~';.J.'I,j'1:~[!U~I~' lliii"'- Ii !-...:. ....,1-;.: .'kt'"'j,hl r.o'" .~. ........j
,... .'-.._....:.........,..;":.;-.'i:~ir.i...;'".,,".,". I. ,"" '.,..,., ..:.;.J....".. ,'rl;:-' :'''~'''''''~''''''''
.1':. ..."'l'..-...--u...:...;.:i..::.....::.;-;.....;...!r,.,;:.-.:..l.~I.I1:..I~!~~ 11.3,; '~..~..,.." ...:IL~~t. 1;1~.J!ilrU.';'. .-......1 .;1
: i .. -~.....:;.......-;.::~:..:...f+-~~17~'~~I.~t!T!:HH;-!~.j1~r j;!i P-I.1 "-r:.~Htnil] ~H:h~t~h~r..'..~'. ....-:.. .'!.
'0 . ,. .. ............,.-......". "L-" "'''''''1'_'' ...". ...,,,,.= -- "XC"";:', -"""''''''1--'''''''''''' .Xi. ~,
.~. . :. ; :V).:;: ::. :.:.;:;: :::.~:::::;:::: 7::~i :::~t!:::":.::: :::il:J::.::.::.. .~.. ::::itii!r... ~j r... _ _. :!:ir~::: :::;r:.:~:-:=: :j::ii:i:::~ :i;~ !:::'
~.. ...~.. I. ...P...oo...oo,--.-I......-..E..I".'I"..I---.~-' ....w-p' - c'" .h.I-."~.....""~"":;:-'I..'.hoo. "-'"
: :;. : : :..:: :\;::.:: ;.;q.:: ::::::::::-::::::1 :":~.:li::: !:;::.:::::: :h: if;: t~-:T :~::t::.:E.. -.::. . ::..:1 ~:=:~;':I':~:::::~f:~~-"': ::~::::;: ::::'~:.:-
5: .': i.:'::: "".;; .;:;I"'I":::':';;:::::::::I""-:]':;:i'{::=II::il\',='l"I:liU:'!-<,- 'I'" ~;K' tlilS-- " . ::~'-1:;JJ1' ~~:" "=mE''-IR'::'I:::::::::-='!'~' .:
,'_..0.". "'....... .........-......-........""i. ., ".................. I... , .... __ '''.....;...L:...;;:;+. . ......'...::;..
_......~.._..... ............_1....._...,.........__...,........... ..... -_.._I..-.u....... ~ ..._._..... ....
7;'1':;'::::: ::;;:::;::::;!:::;:::.:E:::.":1~1-::::~iill ti,nEII~,t1;" !!~I""S1E.. ~ -:.i::1M'iH t::!::JFt=J:;lS5 r.i;;::...~!--=L:E;
'u__. _ .. .. ....:>:.....oo..,.~.--lq.1-,".'~!!'-', e~I"i1,,+,.:;141 ~t.,""P' _ .,.. _, .,,~;. ~;U:lj!t;::::!t~" .... """--,,;.:.1....
6.: 0. :: ~ ~;;~;;;~;:!;i~;i~;;;~~~~~;~~~.;~;~l~~~.~~~;f~~!~!j;~~i];~~ii~~~11~~i~f:~ l~:~ .~ ~~.;? _.. ~~~(~~~~~=d~~~~:~~~~;~~~~;
. '::~"',.. .."~: oo...oo.oooon.....m.L..LI. _,.""LH:fHr.'m~!!:.i!L. _ .. .. _ ._u 1.!i.!ffiiL......"_~,r".t......!~._.......
". .. .. .' -" ......,..........00'00....1.. .-.j....~._-11I "1'1'1' ;'--j"''''--- "0- ., ~,-~ ~l''''"l:" ''''',='-.:1JT "_j"""""h"
. : -: : : "'~::::: :~: : :::;::::;::::::::: :-==. ;::r.~:=r~:,: r: :..~ri =-. ~1! :i~IEE1' X :::~~ ;; :::...~E~!::i: r..~E:uffil-':';:': :::: :.:~t::s..~:::
- ....... ...... '1'" .........-.T--.-..r-.c.'. -~r'r'".-iliEr''' l'; ~ ~ -r.:: 3!ffiilii :;r:~'-.j.;ffi .... '-"'-I':?'
~!:: ~l~~s~t.'~: :::~:1~:~~;0~~;~:~f;:.~il~~,:?~i' '-I.! ~~ili'~ ~~:: ~~: ~-- '~-::-~~gg~,~~~~J~
. :=-:-=-::.:.:.::! :::::'::'::1:::::'::::;:=::='-. =. ...;1- ~~ :.!.. ~~ ~~: -+~ " !" b~.::I ':C!tt ~ 'L:..~;=:~;:::
,_._.. __. _1_ _H:-:,::........~...._.... I...... _ _. ~i.J.- ~. ~t1 . ! ! !+ ~ ..,. .. .~r I HI~;t, :~;~_ .
3 :f.~YHiHHnHIHHn:~!m ~tl!lf:! :HI!Mim: li:utW-I.lf~!IHi)Wii!it@ ~~. i ii:€~ ~m t;J!JjH ~tl!k"f~ .;~ RnliH; H~j~lf~,
:.:;-:.: :-::::~~u.: ::::::: ::::;:::.21;:::::':;: !.:.::: i :..i-U ::!! f:::!:1jJ :;lUi.:P.-. ,n 1::I~~j~r..:- -.E..;I :.;. -;. ~ !:::!il:. :1:::-:!:! --;1S Ht:t:::: :;::.1:::: ; :::
, ~ j~~.~r~~{i\stH\~~]!g\\~i~~~~~~!~~F1.\m~! mil1~ t=1i mj1rW~ ::~ ~ fu1 ii;fpJjJI81~pj ~UfJ~[JF[s~l~
2 - : ;"::-:-:;7.::-:::':' :::::::.::::::~::~~=-= t.~t~r: :,' ,I: 1': 71: II: :':J!H ~r. _ ..... :",::; j::r_."nr~;..-:-~ :!":l.r....",;.i.H:~~:1=:: _....
.:"::':-:':;':'i=:::i~ ::::;:::::I~?-:;:; 5:; imt!ijl~~j i!ti il.'j'fI!! IE ;ii11iIlg:; j J:~ ,., :,.,[i11 , ,.~ ::r-'"", ;:~ ,5' ::::I='~
: ~~~~_-'3~::~::: g~~)I~~:.'-3ifui ::~~'~ '1~'lb,,\:~~I!'J; 1i,.I;;I~ia" '! ~ 1:'~ ~-'" to. ~ .:; ;:ri~g
r"7:::"-t::=::~,r.~~rt.nt:: tit:~...~f1 q:lili., q 4i. 1111 I;.t.; p~j It!,.. .IJ .......;.;.;~ :I::::t
; ....---=---fA3()y...-::7,'c~d.'iI~nc".e'f.~ il.~~Iti'I:'t/~, (..,5 :~:D(~ .' ~4"':: cz ~i' 'd,'J s:::~.
:::~ ~~E~i.:74:2;.; ~1.t'~~~.r.."'~;:' zW 4':OO~fll~il~+ Y.~;I~~"L -1_. ,.;~ - 'j :I!U1~ -')';'=11 tf=' ..:.~
'1::-::: ~.------".,.;,;r;:rt "'. "". I: I '!-H' .~ " ., ". '--
~i:.- ,,,. ..... .,. .'. ,':.!I~ ., '. It! ,t+ ';,; ; 7f=f. .
l' II II . p' , '~ ++...,..
,,1; :2 3 4. D ,e 7-. ,go I '0 IS a. :3.;. A' ~5 a!
! )' ;: ~ .. ..' I ~ , . ~
j I. I . I II
1 : . : . I . . :! . ~ I
: ABOVE FREOUENCIES ARE YEARS PER 100 YEARS:. .: ; ,
, ON THE AVERAGE, RAINFALL INTENSITIES ARE EOUALLED I:;!.
OR EXCEEDED. o( A PI:> 1 . '
5
~
.5
D
GS
;. -I:)
!I- [s.
-:-::'/'5'
R.1vised
I ," I ::' ::1. ..
D~te 9-18-671" ~!TY OF 'C~UL~ :Vl,S;TA i
D~te /(~'!6-(;7 PUBLIC WORKS !':DEPARTMENT.;
:,~'--i) /7~? ~.:I '.J .\: .,-' ,tfINFALL !.INfENSI't:1" C,vD,?
~ ~ ,1' . , I ""1'. :i .117j
n;,""'-- nt ry~,..,:.-~",:-" DURATION CURVE;; 'i ;::
. I
j
,
-
Drawn R. J. C.
..
:.I5~15 T.L.
Bl2h;-:',1f-.
'! I
Approved
.
.
.
.,
.
.!
. .
.1
:,l
\.
't
j d' ..
j
j .7
j
i
!
J
! t;
'IIJ
J ...
.J
1 z -'
, -
!=-
;~
,z
Z
IIJ
c..
10
~
...
o
~
-
~
W
- .3
,
: .
;
!
{
REV.
. . ~
,
;
\
1.0
~CHART I-I03.6C
10
..
,
a
<
7 '" .
w,
::;
u:
:0'
, % i
-j
:2j
~,
z.
~ z .
W'
c..
o.
'.
,/~
..J
~~
........11,.. ~
~
o
o
...
....
o.
?....
.'
.
.~/
4=.
~
~
~
,/
l~
, ./,.....'
~..
,/,
3
.z
,
.
l
"
"j
I ..
I
10
8
~
o
o
...
.....
en
...
u
z
,
~
4
3
-
..J
...
o
z
o
;0
z
~
o
~
./ -
;( ~
~ ~.I,. Z
.! /'.~ It
,/ 0
.yo ~
.3
...
o
~
::
A
.3
.2
It:
W
c..
>
~
U
<
c..
<
U
.I
.08
i
!
Z I
I ~..~) .ru..
c1 'J L ~: \ r" -~7~....rl':~'t
-= LJ_J___ ~--- -, . ~-:-_ 1
I : L.ul ...r....... (11
-r EL.EVATION i SECTION
CITY OF SAN DIEGO DESIGN GUIDE
NOMOGRA~~CAPACITY ,CURB
INtET AT SAG
J is' ~:- ~'X-
.06
.O~
.04
.03
~
~
3
z
I.~
1.0
.9
~
::
~
'W
::
.8
.7
...
o
'"
::!
a:
w
~
:0
.6
.~
::
.....
e..
~
.4
c
w
C
Z
o
e..
.3
.Z
- .I~
SHT. NO.'
/: "f~~.....;.;;--......~......",.~):~~......;:-.-;::::--.:;..-:-0.:i-'*:"~-'~.ol"5;~~':->,""~.-I"-' -
'::<-";~l'''~.- ,.'-1";::'-<;.".. .'~._~,<"..;:r.... ~~ ~Ji"" 'II'.'
'.-::'J . ,- T:'~.~M'_"'?":':'J~ ....\.1.'~:;s.b: ......""110.
. '-""'1Jf"1 .~' _.J:.:-...-~.."....~...~..........\Oi" ~
- =-."1..-,' .,....::T~..",'-<J~::"I~' ~ ~. .
:---.-'A' "':-o~I:.!,,:""ljf"~~'~~j~~~ i-..~.A .
'. _.7';: - '-:d>i~l.~~ 'J;.'t-:~..vn?~)...~r:-D~~~c,(:'> ~
. "'.;c:: ~-~"2'r>-i-'~"";::';':("~::;;;~ :~- ,. '~;.s.:.:(I"2Q0-.'j_'~r""'- ......'_~;
l" .....>!i:....::-~"':.~ "'~::r"':":"'cj.l."'!'....!!f?'''''''--'-
r- '" :.,' ,...:%>"~,, .'I:........~..... .~...._~ ~.. .~..~....-'- '''~
' .~ ~L+:- "'<~-~~~ti;.';'l.~,.c~~~.::.;~::.?t~:.~ .i!l:l.o~'
,"-' ~:~..;J\:;-J(~ ~~' ;.....:;:'-1. :~...:~..... """"oi:. .:':--,....~ '... .
\ ....) ....~~. 1 . . )':~1..... ., ~~V-:" :::,;.. . I . ~
,~.d~,~~..!--J1~.;:. ':' ;:"'~.,,~...::~~. ~~"t.,E.I,"'-'~~,!<;~, :'i1::!",~"~
-':r- ~.t~~.. "." -..' . -- ;~J,-_..r-:- _c'...~.... .....~ '" -=F ........ ~Ti ..
."- ~..""'. ~Io"..~.._. '-':.":-<!~~ - j~"iC..'-:;':J:'.~"" . ':-''':..jq:~
--'~~., .. ?:"'~~. .~.... .......,...~1"tL-~ ..",...~~k~S.'~:'~':r.~.t'J~"~
! . '.' :'--'- ...::~'''':''''--:E;''''' .
.;.;.
Pl,RT 2
,
!
; CD1iS'T?l!:T Iry.;
K,mIALS
SECTI:N 200 - "::>:;t: f~'1TRI^LS
'C'::-1.1
Gono, e I (;>. 65)
"'\I~eit\e:te R:x::k p.ai~":t:ls - Tyt-'3 .S'" z:::s ~
.iJ ]., Sec~]ot\ "'XI r-.~y t"2 cS':!d, ur:less s~:]fl-
~rD~'blt~ ]n :~E"C'~I ?rC'...j~;Dns".
,
~'~-1.5 i S+onc for F:J~ (;:'I~ :'9)
1
"T~ 1nd1vJduel =!:!~,=,s. ::>1 r'Z~.s l'S.~ ]1'\ s.lc~
~ ;or sl-,ljll wi,fo:-:;, 1-:- 1!."? kI1o,,:n9:
P~?c:~,,:...s:: l'-.:::!~~ j...;q....
l ; cc_,;,,,,--- ,
r;To:I~~J ~~~ l~-:lS:~~'~F
, -5
0:1-100 0-5
~S-\OO 5-3-1W
."
')-5
~~-10C'
0-5
~~-1 ~o
:-;-1 CC
9:-10('
?5-1 :0
0-5
25-75 0-5
~D-l:C ?5-75
l:'-100
.-.----
7"Jn1' of m~~er!~! s"':.~I:{.r 't~.:'n th..; 5-":'.~lles1
!~"~d In r,-he ti\~Je i~!'" lj:'lY cl~ss 01 iXJ. sJQ?e
~;:YI sho!! net ex:e:--j -:-~ pE-":er,'tt:e>e I JnJt
ii, 't"he t~ble o;-~erli,lned on a "",=:ctlt besls.
~~.::e w:thlthe perc~nt~~ I !IT'Jt sh;1O'TI 11"1 the
{:),r ~II or'ler s::::es of the '"~lv'duld pJeces
c: ~ss of red. s I o;~ pr01e-:t:0"'I s!-:~ II !::.e de-
"<j ~y the Ir~t to 01 t:-.~ nu:r.ber of J!'\d]v] ~Ulj I
:i)r9~ then the sr:':~IIf:'st s1:::e liS~E'd In t~e
fer thet ~I ess. .
i
i
3
"200-1.6.1 Setectlon of Rfprap ...d FlIter
blon~e1 ~~1erlol
Filter Slen..t (3)
f ]. l%-)per- Leyer{s)
/' I'
Opt. 1 Opt. 2
Vel. Rock Rfprep !;e(:. Soc. lower
Ft / See Cless Thld<- 200 Aoo Opt. 3 Loyer
(I) (21 ness "'P' ( (I (( ) (51 (5)
6-7
No. 3
Seek-
Ing
7-8
No. 2
Bee.-
Ing
F",,-
8-9.5 Ing
9.5-11 L1 ght
1/4
11-13 Ton
. .6
~/16"
i
1.0 1/,("
:,. ( 3/8"
2.0 1/2"
2.7 3/4"
1/2
13-15 Ton 3.( 1"
15-17 Ton A.3 1/2"
17-20 2 Ton 5.( 2"
C2
. D.G.
B3 D.G.
i
,
D.G.
3/''',
1 :1n"
P.B.
31."~ ,
1 1/2"
P.B.
3/"",
1 .1/2"
P.B.
Type B
Type B
Send
Sand
SlIRd
Send
Prect1col use of thIs tah:e Is I hnl+f'd fu s1tu!ltJons
where ftT" Js le~s~t~8n D. I
(1) A,,,,,og. veloC1ty In pIpe cr botiC>1l 'velocIty In
energy d Jss1petOl", .tl Jche\lEr !s. gr~1ei.
: I . ; I
121 If o..lr&d :rlprep on' f11ter bl"".e\ clOH 1.
not eve1Ieble,' use next lerger cle-ss.
I
!
i, -~ - .-"'------,-.
'T"::i;':::!!i'i~"'~'!;;'1'~t''''~''.;;>::''''~'~M..'~~~'';:~t~- ,. -
..'.. ~:'."~ ",,:t:. ,~(~ ._y.,. !"~A'ltl~ . .""-....-. ..~......
~ ~~. ~..'-> ,::c1"'f.:> "';;"'c'i:'=:t:i.\<"~~ ,~!\T!\f:"i:V~ ,!~...
" ,-,,~,',>':~.~t~ I.; .r,.., ,,".>,,-,.,," ;1,1." ""'~- '~~_,.. '...
-.........,....,. ." '-'-'~""~~" .~. --- .,'-. .,..~
-. ,.~-...~. s"'.. ~~... oI-oi- ....,,;...-;-j.:..:'t ,~~ _.._~.-
::..;....~~ ':p, .~l.,.~..........;(:....~.:t;"..l,.,L.l:I',t:::.~;r :\ f. (-t:"":.. ,.J
J,'-':~_ ~.~tT{'''~..~"...:f.~':t~~~~_r:........::3.....~.~.~~~~ ~,.
, .,.,~u,~ > J " '",_.~_"'_ -'~"'""".=~"
-''': .....;..~ ~ "" .'._ ':. ~t>.~':::-:"";:!"~~!'~"";'.-\:.;. "':'!-~",1.,~ (~ ..
. ~t_.::r~~.~~~~.~;ctf,.:b~~J..."t~.~~tq;...tao. ~,
. ~'-';:"I'i..-tr".. .:..,,'t.,.,.......~........~. wJ.Jh=t!~w: ~ .
, -o$;~'ff';1;"'b;'><<of::~i1i~'~""I" .~"'"~- ';" ::{~" ~~
~..~~.(~~I.~~~r.~~\.l~~~:~g"r-~~ ~ .~ ,~~ .
-;,-.'P m7~~-~~ ,"j:;'''''''i'~I;;,-..,~~"t11:. _.~'7.
"~~~.~' i" ';;'.I;':~~"!~;'~I"I;iioI."'~ _<J; ".,
,P."f~~.' , "~v _ '4'::'>"~<iJ'p" ~I'~ '" < ,.--q
~%~.. ~~.~~,.,:t,.~~~~~\",~ "'$. -.:::> _
..:>.~ "T'!iri~""'=r.:-..:.~. -..... .
:!~~. ~~:r, ;}:__....>""';" ''f~ .~h _-% ~ ,"'~ ~' _~
_-:l. ~'-f.:'j.:".. .,.,. -~r,-...1 '.,.._.....'" ....' _ >.:......
-, :.<;~1?~~ ,'$ ~ill5~,-,~:."~",f"',-,;~~.'" .$~f;.", '" "
I ~...~--- -j,~..f-.- ~.;-....-~.~,........~.~I.!.....,'S. '-1'"t..j..~ ~ .....:;:>;,::..,..
1.~. ~-;i~'i, -~I J..;;7 :-l"-!'~~.7 ..~;-:i.~ .~,;:~>'3~;:;;Jt::,,; ~~.- {.r, 7~;..'.~~;;:~~:~~
;
,
!
,
2.'.D.
~,n: .
} ~~'.~U'gO
JJ10....
>
Q
Ii
, '
J I
!
l-;
(Y'1
I :
,-.1
,r=>\
( (', )-1
,.\., '., -,.I
'\,,-~",,)
~
.,
z
a
~
,U
:.:../
..,
.
.
. '
;;
;
"
,....1..1.. ....c.''',;,.L
_040.'. .
b<..AV O~1-"t ~~0..,"9"'7
,.,:....' . "''''07-P..
. ~
Cj
bR~
.
.",
>
"
)::j i
~i i
:), "
31
".r.:t.)oioOSo'
...0....21't.O
I
.
~
J
~
~
o _
~
<\'"=
E:o
,.N
" '.
':(1..,
....)1'
~'1z. .
~ ~
"I ~.; ~
2::
,
('\.~ ;::;.
~J
":" ......
~
'-
-
'0
:--1:~ 2 ;~
'-'(,.'(~J'<:...'
~
- ,0 0
c'':=' -;
. .
~
~
"-;.2
l:
.E
C>
~
,s
~
r :.~ "... ;::;
....... - :::: l') ~?
,c-.\ (, --.....
~;;-..:-,
c:r-;U-.E
C::;:~cJ~;-;
o q .:~ .S
C .'-:
'- >-: D
c- '1
r:; 0
\...:.
, 0 S:
-
,.;
. " ,6
'-.J ~_
~
'i
i
n'
~
~
r
" . "''T:
.
,
.' 'IT" ," " '" we .,,,,
.~",.:
............
........
'.'.10(.'1>0
...0.....'2'1.0
~~...C.TT
.'
y' ~5P'"\.O"""'T ::;>:.r.~f"'T
(J'SW'CJJ g ~ I.... 1"0 /,)'h"U71. , '1('
,..,_.__ _,,:O_"i9'"-L___ __\..__~O;:'-~!<t
.1 r-- :.J' ...
.-' I
I
I
!
j
'W
Z
<l
-.J
..r....SHO' (j)
".C.ltOI~
(j)
W
0:::
Q,
.. ,.,.....'"
~:l:n'
...W.O.7g:,J
I
MAP NO, 7156
HU'
/
-'--rl
, I
I !
I,
J r
J r
'L
; +f"1!'!!II :~:~r'
..:r-W.D......,U
1~)1I
:!
..
""
",)0.
, BRENTWOOD
ARMS
I
rJli2l)~:81
.."'"-'.\,....:..0 ~o...: <.i
.......0..".,.09
.e.uIlY 00-.1\..."" ~I _0,"0;..".7
. ,. '.0.( -_I """"'" .,O~:)
.
sua
2
,~: ZI"'"
::: z::n"
bJ ~).Z4
j
U
4.....C..:.. /9C,0 WV. .7$7
I I
~
~
"
:1
t
,2 cl
10'11I0"
u.s",,'
.
~
. C ,'9
:', ., I
I
:1
~(Q-r.::>
l
,
~. ---------~--~
Scr........;: /... ...
---------7-~ ~
rUru(HT...... ....., .....
n..sW"~1 ....
!:
.
"
~
"
OC>,
.. 40.....2:)
arli. ..0
IotC. ...:3..1!:::
~
i
1:5'"
"
.
....
'It
-~
~
o
"''nl
A.C.1t[r1ooU:1tT
I).oS....Ie.'1
~~IS.
,,,....
~
OJECT SITE
Q~sr
.
~
~
...-
.
. 'USOICNT ~
..
/?V- DrF cr
-.........-
. c"r."".'''7D
c-k"", w.o. '~1C
1Ic:....b.r&s[\I[1lT
'i I~":"" '''iral
~~ .
I? ....'1(1. [AS[Ur,"
jC ro'/ .,.cw....,
~ ~ l .
· 1
, I
~ ,.
~~~ 2c
.~ ~
E .._~._ (wI
, '--
'i
:
'"
.
"
.
~
.
g
;
, i
.. '.
,.1:.....
-
"f").'C, 'u
wo .&.l:'U
~ SCALE ,I~ FEET e
10D aDD
".
n.
."
---
. : --:-:----;---
-
CQR~rCTTo ,-,o......~
j,-,---~-
..
ATTACHMENT 5
PUBLIC RESPONSE / APPLICANT RESPONSE
- ~/-
THIS PAGE WAS INTENTIONAILY LEFT BLANK
-0;2-
BilJ Enms
Theresa Grady
6 ~orth Del Mar /we.
Chula Vista, CA 9 I 9 I 0
(6 I 9)420-9203
) ir Mando Liuag, Project Pla1lJ1er
P12.nning Department, Public Services Building
Chula Vista Ci\;c Center
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 9 I 910
Nav 1:2 1S9S
Reference: Case :'\0. PCS-96-06
Vista Del Mar, Chula Vista Tract 96-06
De2-r 1\1r. Liuag.
In response to the Notice of Public Hearing we received regarding the above referenced property.
2-5 property owners adjacent to the proposed development, we would like to request the city
address two issues of concern.
When we were shopping for a house about 3 \" years ago, we chose the one we finally purchased
for several reasons. Firstly, because of the area and secondly because of the view. In fact about
two years ago we began a project to enhance the view. We submitted plans to the city for the
construction of a second story sun-deck that would enhance our \;ew of the bay, Point Lorna, the
Coronado Bridge and dO\",ntown San Diego. Upon our original submission of the plans they were
rejected due to an encroachment on the required set-back. We were advised by several city
employees in the City Planning Department that we could petition to build on the set-back if we
could prove we had a good reason. We were also ad\;sed that if we could prove the sun-deck
would afford us an enhancement to our view the city would consider approving our plans. We
took this advice and petitioned for a variance. We went to great lengths to provide the city with
letters ITom our neighbors, photographs ITom our home and both our neighbor's homes, and hired
2.l1 architect to help us with this rebuttal. iiller many months and trips to the City's Planning
Department we were granted a variance and approval of our original plans. Not only did this take
us a great deal oftime but it also cost us a lot of money. We paid the e>.1:ra charges that were
imposed by the city and we paid e>.1:ra for an architect to help resolve this issue. We have also
invested a considerable amount of money in building an e>.1:remely well structured, high quality
deck and patio. At this time construction is almost complete. Our estimated completion date is
1\ovember 29, 1996. All ofthis has been in an errort to increase our property value, enhance a
beautiful \;ew and increase the enjoyment of our home and neighborhood. We are concerned that
the height of the new homes \>,;11 obstruct our view.
Several months ago we were advised of the development ne>.1:-door by Mr. Dan Irwin. He
approached Bill here at our home and showed him his tentative plans and explained his building
- G 3-
deslgn. From \\ hat he told Bill. he plans 10 build qu~!it\. homes comparable to ours. We he in
one of se\.en homes that was built about four years ago. Since these homes are relatively new
2nd are valued at approximately 5220,000 to 5240,0000 \\.e are concerned that the houses we wi1l
be sharing property lines with be of comparable value. Our concern here is of course the possible
de\'aluation of our own home,
We believe there are already factors that may attribute to a lower property \'alue in our area,
They are listed as f01l0ws:
. We live in an older neighborhood where many of the houses are small and their
property values are considerably less than ours,
. Within a quarter-mile there is an apartment complex, a senior citizen apartment
complex and a trailer park
!iiI. If\\in appeared sincere and we are not doubting his integrity, but we believe it is in our best
interest as well as our neighbor's if the city would assure us of his intentions to build homes of the
same quality as ours and proi\ide us with further detail of the construction and levels of where the
homes will sit on the lots,
1.,.1r, Liuag, we are respectfully asking you and the city to help us in maintaining the value of our
home and keeping our view, We know we have adhered to all the city's guidelines and advice on
this issue and believe the City of Chula Vista has a main interest in maintaining quality
neighborhoods and quality homes for future prospective residents, \Ve are asking that the plans
for the 15 homes on the adjacent lot be built as tastefully as ours and that they not compromise
the beautiful view that we have invested in heavily,
Sincerely,
.
1~/77)/~~</~~ ~ 1~,~/dJ(
4~. (______ I ()
William J, EnJTIs Theresa Grady
.
{PL/-
.~
December 12, 1996
r7.'~(::?j\/2C'
DEC 1 S 75":'f;
Mr. Bill Ennis
Miss Theresa Grady
6 North Del Mar Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
,-,
i-'LI':'I' \"
.'"1/'.1/ ':;\Ir
>! II ~ \.:,
Re: Response to your Planning Department Letter of 11/12/96
Dear Mr. Ennis and Miss Grady,
Vista Del Mar Subdivision, Tract 96-06, will be 15, 2 story single family homes. The architecture
style will be similar to our award winning homes at 556 Glover Avenue. The roofs will be tiled
and the structures will complement the existing surrounding homes. The properties are planned
to be landscaped and fenced with underground utilities. Our price range will be $235,000 -
$250,000, depending on the home selected. We can also build a custom home to suit the buyer.
Lot number 13 is the lot you are concerned about interrupting your view. The pad elevation
planned will be more than 20 feet below the floor of your second story.
We plan to build a building to meet the City of Chula Vista's building standards and keeping
within the design of the surrounding houses.
Sincerely
Q~~<
~
Dan Irwin
D.B.L. D. Fish
c.c.: Mr. Mando Liuag, Project Planner
~~.l-
THIS PAGE BLANK
___ &6-
A'ITACHMENT 6
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
- r; 1-
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEME~T
Stal<m<nt of disclosure of c<min own<rship interests, paym<nts, or =pa.;gn contributions, on all I:latl<rs which
will require discretionary action on lbe pan of the Ciry Council, Planning Commission, and all olber official bodies, '
The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons have a fmancial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcolltractor,
material supplier.
D/9.'V' 'r'- C>..( <.J ,,:: ! /2 <.-> (~ .5 c.1 I r i's C.A ..,,/ K
2. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or pannership, list lbe names of all
individuals owning more lban 10% of lbe shares in lbe corporation or owning any pannership interest in
the pannership.
/)LhJ I ,2 4~ I~J 0,4 ~I i C> / R. C-..J /-J
3. If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list lbe names of any
person serving as director of lbe non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustee of the trust.
",-. /"
4. Have you had more than 5250 wortb of business transacted wilb any member of the Ciry staff, Boards,
Commissions, Comm.inees and Council wilbin the past twelve months?
.-1./0 '
5. Pl=e identify each and every person, including any agents, employees; consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you be~ore lbe Ciry in this maner.
,;1./~'~ C
6. Have you andlor your officers or agents, in lbe aggregate, contributed more than 51,000 to a Council
member in the current or preceding ejection period? Yes [ ] No IKt If yes, state which Council
member(s): .
Person is defmed 15: .. AIJy individual. firm. co-parmership. joint vtnturt., usociarion, socw dub, frate.rm..\ organiurion, corporation. t:sta~.
trUSt. ~::ei"er. syndiC,LC. this and aD)' other COUnty. city and county, city. municipality, discict or othcr polirica.! subdivision. or any other group
or I:ombi.nacion acting as a unit..
(!iOTE: Aa.ob addjriona! pages as oomsary)
"
Date:
(;-1/- ?r:.
~~\,
\.. /
~:-<-J';--
Signarure of contractor/applicant
PRC:$. D8L. U Dc-/.. .""',fl!?..
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
VA N /r:<!.J/H
<
-~fl-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
II
Item
/;V~~~ Meeting Date 1/14/97
Resolution ;' ~-::5')~ Approving a contract for
$69,000 with Marty Chase for updating the Public
Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) program
and the related Fire Facilities Master Plan (PS-
147) and appropriating additional funds therefor.
SUBMITTED BY: Deputy City Manager Krempl&t~
Principal Management :rf~stant Young~
REVIEWED BY: Ci ty Manager\,.X~ L1I:k :?:1'~~J5ths Vote: Yes--1L No_
The Public Facilities DevelopmentJImpact Fee program provides for
the funding required to construct needed public facilities and
prevent existing residents from subsidizing the City's capital
costs to serve new development. In order to properly reflect
changes in the City's facility needs and their respective costs
since the last update, it is proposed that the City enter into a
contract to update both the Public Facilities DIF and the related
Fire Facilities Master Plan. The timing of this update is intended
to incorporate the Otay Ranch annexation area into the DIF prior to
issuance of any building permits.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution to award
the contract and appropriate additional funds therefor.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
BACKGROUND
The Public Facilities Development Impact Fee program (PFDIF or DIF)
enables the City to implement the intent of the Growth Management
Program and ensure that existing residents do not bear the costs of
new development. Following the requirements of Assembly Bill 1600
of 1987 (Government Code 66000), this program was adopted by
Ordinance 2320 in 1989.
One of many separate DIF programs (for such items as roads,
drainage and SR-125), the PFDIF is intended to collect the costs of
new or expanded City facilities as new projects are built. The
components of this program include:
* Civic Center Expansion
* Police Department Expansion and Improvements
* Corporation Yard Relocation
* Libraries
* Fire Suppression System
* Geographic Information System (GIS)
* Mainframe Computer
* Telephone System Upgrade
* Records Management System
/1- /
Item
Meeting Date
, Page 2
1/14/97
It is the program's intent that the cost of these facilities be
shared among the various beneficiaries of the facilities. In cases
where the existing population creates part of the need for a
facility, the cost associated with this "City Share" will be borne
by the City of Chula Vista on behalf of existing residents. The
City share represents a deficiency to be made up by the City and/or
the provision by the City of a new facility that benefits both
existing and future residents (e.g. to make up for space
deficiencies at the corporation yard or to build a fire training
tower which serves the whole City). On the other hand, where
future development creates an additional facility need for the new
residents, the cost associated with this new need is apportioned to
the future development in the form of a fee, and represents the DIF
share (e.g. Fire Station #6, serving the EastLake/Rancho La Cuesta
area) .
The formula for determining each charge is complex.
evaluation of:
It entails
1) Long term facility needs, typically via master planning
2) Costs for those new or expanded facilities
3) Adequacy of existing facilities to meet buildout needs
(or applicable standards/ratios)
4) Computation of City Deficiency shares which would not be
borne by development
5) Projections of new units or projects to be developed
through the term of the DIF (through 2010)
6) Assignment of a per unit or "Equivalent Dwelling Unit"
(EDU) fee to pay for the appropriate share of new
facilities.
As development phasing and density change and construction costs
for new facilities change, the City updates the DIF to reflect both
the new costs and the appropriate share to be borne by those units
left to be built.
Recent communications from the Building Industry Association point
out how important it is that these calculations be precise and
appropriately justified. In 1993, staff and a consultant worked
closely with local developers and building industry groups to
incorporate all identified concerns and present a consensus report.
That same cooperation and detailed review would also be part of the
development of any update to the DIF.
Finally, regarding the Fire Facilities Master Plan, this is a study
that evaluates the precise locations for new fire stations or
relocation sites for existing stations to optimize response times
and fulfill the GMOC guidelines. This entails collection of
existing response time data, measurement of alternate routings on
))-.2
Item
Meeting Date
, Page 3
1/14/97
existing streets, estimation of response times and routings on
planned streets, and computer modeling of the data to provide an
efficient fire station network.
DISCUSSION
Staff Availabilitv
The last major updates to the Public Facilities DIF and Fire
Facilities Master Plan were accomplished by the Policy Analysis and
Program Evaluation Unit (PAPE) of the Management and Information
Services Department. That division has since been eliminated due
to budget cuts. Although some of the staff who worked on those
projects are still with the City, current assignments do not allow
enough time for the in-depth, several month project of updating the
DIF. To the extent possible, they will be lending their expertise
and oversight to this project.
RFP for Consultant
On November 22, staff issued a request for proposals for an update
to the Public Facilities DIF, incorporating among other things,
updated costs for required facilities and consideration of the
City-annexed parcels of Otay Ranch. This RFP also requested
proposals for an update to the Fire Facilities Master Plan, to be
included in a final contract at the City's option.
In addition to the general notice on this solicitation, staff also
sent RFP packages to three consultants which have had previous
experience with similar proj ects. Willdan Associates had worked on
the previous update to the Public Facilities DIF. Marty Chase, as
the former Assistant Director of Management and Information
Services, had worked on both this update and the 1989 Fire
Facilities Master Plan. Ralph Anderson and Associates had
developed the FIND model (Fiscal Impact of New Development) and
worked on the Public Facilities Financing Plan for Otay Ranch.
willdan Associates and Ralph Anderson each declined
the RFP. The sole response submitted was from Marty
bid of $46,000 for the PFDIF update and $23,000
Facilities Master Plan update.
to respond to
Chase, with a
for the Fire
Scope of Services
The proposal for the PFDIF included several
comprehensive each component update would be.
options for how
Based on funding
///]
Item
Meeting Date
, Page 4
1/14/97
considerations and priority updates being the corporation year,
civic center and fire facilities components, staff negotiated a
contract, presented tonight that includes PFDIF update at $46,000
and a Fire Facilities Master Plan update at $23,000.
The recommended approach is to use existing master plan documents
as a foundation. The consultant would then work with staff to
compile data and then develop formulas and projections to update
the data and assumptions contained in the master plans. Particular
emphasis would be placed on the corporation yard (making prior cost
projections more site-specific), civic center (considering long-
term parking and office annex needs) and fire facilities
components. The fire and police components bear close scrutiny due
to their relationship to GMOC response time thresholds.
There are not sufficient funds at this time to perform a
comprehensive update of each of the master plans. These will be
done incrementally, with Fire Facilities planning updated now to
coincide with final planning of the various Otay Ranch villages.
The Library master plan is budgeted for update in 1997-98.
The proposed contract is structured for work to be completed by 175
days after the agreement is executed, or by approximately July 8.
This timeline is anticipated to accommodate the proper assessment
of the amended PFDIF to pending Otay Ranch building permits.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The City's Capital Improvement Program includes an appropriation of
$50,000 for the update of the Fire Facilities Master Plan (PS-147).
Of this funding, $23,000 would be required for the services to be
provided under this contract.
The remainder of the contract, to update the Public Facilities DIF,
does not currently have a related appropriation. It is recommended
that the $46,000 for this portion of the project be appropriated
from two sources: a $20,000 deposit toward that update from Otay
Vista Associates (per their tentative map conditions) and other
existing DIF balances in fund 850 (Public Facilities DIF). This
cost would be supported by the Administrative component of the fees
collected.
~-1
RESOLUTION NO.
/Yff'~
Q>>;f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR $69,000
WITH MARTY CHASE FOR UPDATING THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE (PFDIF)
PROGRAM AND THE RELATED FIRE FACILITIES MASTER
PLAN (PS-147) AND APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL
FUNDS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee
program provides for the funding required to construct needed
public facilities and prevent existing residents from subsidizing
the City's capital costs to serve new development; and
WHEREAS, in order to properly reflect changes in the
City's facility needs and their respective costs since the last
update, it is proposed that the City enter into a contract to
update both the Public Facilities DIF and the related Fire
Facilities Master Plan; and
WHEREAS, the timing of this update
incorporate the Otay Ranch annexation area into
issuance of any building permits.
is intended to
the DIF prior to
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve a contract with Marty Chase
for updating the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF)
program and the related Fire Facilities Master Plan (PS-147), a
copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as
Document No.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that $46,000 is hereby
appropriated from two sources: a $20,000 deposit from Otay vista
Associates (per their tentative map conditions) and other existing
DIF balance in Fund 850 (Public Facilities DIF). The balance of
the contract amount has already been appropriated in the City's
Capital Improvement Project as a part of PS-147, the Fire
Facilities Master Plan.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
J}~ JlJl ~H'~ ~~,i~$ ~
Jo . Kaheny, cay Att ney
George Krempl, Deputy City
city Manager
//--5
Parties and Recital pagels}
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
Marty Chase
for updating the City of Chula Vista Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee Program and Fire Station Master Plan
This agreement ("Agreement"), dated January 14, 1997 for the
purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last
executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on
Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is
set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on
the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business
form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of
business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A,
paragraph 6 ( "Consul tant"), and is made with reference to the
following facts:
Recitals
Whereas, the City of Chula Vista has a development impact
fee program pursuant to Government Code 66000 et seq. and
Ordinances 2320, 2432 and 2554; and,
Whereas, said program provides for the funding of various
public facilities necessitated by new development occurring in
the City and General Plan area; and,
Whereas, said program must be updated regularly to reflect
current costs and facility needs; and,
Whereas, Consultant has replied to a City request for
proposals to update that program and related documents and been
recommended by staff to perform said work; and,
Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can
prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City
within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement;
(End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.)
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 1
J//t
Obligatory Provisions Pages
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant
do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties
A. General Duties
Consultant shall perform all of the services described on
the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties";
and,
B. Scope of Work and Schedule
In the process of performing and delivering said "General
Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services
described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and
Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according
to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph
8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in
Exhibit A, Paragraph B, within the time frames set forth therein,
time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties
and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and
Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services".
Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated
does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate
this Agreement.
C. Reductions in Scope of Work
City may independently, or upon request from Consultant,
from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by
the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and
Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose
of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation
associated with said reduction.
D. Additional Services
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set
forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional
consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional
Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the
scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform
same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the
"Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 10 (C), unless a separate
fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for
Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed.
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 2
//- ?
E. Standard of Care
Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement,
whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in
a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under
similar conditions and in similar locations.
I. Business License
Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City
and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code.
2. Duties of the City
A. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose
of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule
therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to
achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit
access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant
throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City
agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set
forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, and with the further
understanding that delay in the provision of these materials
beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a
basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance
of this agreement. The parties hereto acknowledge that City will
provide certain raw data as well as policy directives to
Consultant; City acknowledges that Consultant is entitled to rely
on such information which will in part be a basis for
Consultant's work under this agreement.
B. Compensation
Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant
submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 17, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on
the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17, City
shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consult-
ant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship
indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement,
subject to the requirements for retention set forth in paragraph
18 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of
pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11.
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 3
J/-~
All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain
sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to
permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable
thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's
account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 (C) to be
charged upon making such payment.
3. Administration of Contract
Each party designates the individuals ("Contract
Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 12, as said
party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to
represent them in the routine administration of this agreement.
4. Term.
This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have
complied with all executory provisions hereof.
5. Liquidated Damages
The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages
Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 13.
It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the
essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to
estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per-
formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a
reasonable amount to compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted
time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the
following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess
of the time specified for the completion of the respective work
assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the City,
or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages
Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 13 ("Liquidated Damages
Rate") .
Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control,
other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in
writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior
to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time,
when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work
and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work
unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the
progress of the work.
2pty9 . wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 4
//-1
6. Financial Interests of Consultant
A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer.
If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 14, as
an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for
the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and
disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the
City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in
such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 14 of
Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the
City Attorney.
B. Decline to Participate.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC
Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in
any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a
governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to
know Consultant has a financial interest other than the
compensation promised by this Agreement.
C. Search to Determine Economic Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC
Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has
diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's
economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations
promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has
determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's
knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with
Consultant's duties under this agreement.
D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC
Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant
will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during
the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of
interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act.
E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC
Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant
will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant
learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result
in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political
Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder.
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement
1993
(Fourth Revision)
Page 5
~~v
~
F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests.
Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant,
nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's
employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any
interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property
which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in
any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries
of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined
Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 14.
Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise
of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or
other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant
Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this
Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such
promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or
for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not
acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this
Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this
Agreement, except with the written permission of City.
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any
party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in
conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement,
except with the written permission of City.
7. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and
employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability,
cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees)
arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or
employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the
execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for
those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful
conduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's
indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses,
attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers,
agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether
the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its
own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any
such suit or action brought against the City, its officers,
agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall
not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the
Consultant.
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 6
//-//
8. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a
timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this
Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to
Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date
thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such
termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents,
data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other
materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the
City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work
satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up
to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the
amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by
Consultant's breach.
9. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the City Administrator determines that the
Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance
of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City
greater than would have resulted if there were no such
negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City
for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein
is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this
agreement.
10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least
thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination.
In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other
materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City,
become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is
terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for
any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other
materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant
hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or
compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth
herein.
2pty9 . wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 7
////2
11. Assignability
The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and
Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and
shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by
assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City.
City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the
Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 to the
subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants".
12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms,
designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or
properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and
exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties
produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be
subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant
in the United States or in any other country without the express
written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority
to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions
of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use,
copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports,
studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties
produced under this Agreement.
13. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and
Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole
control of the manner and means of performing the services
required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to
reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any
of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for
all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and
shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them
shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are
entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement
benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other
leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or
federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax,
and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of
same and shall hold the City harmless with regard thereto.
14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this
agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been
presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by
the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 8
//---/3
1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to
time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this
reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and
procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
good
over
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in
faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute
the terms of this Agreement.
15.
Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in
litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense
of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees.
16. Statement of Costs
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document,
or participates in the preparation of a report or document in
performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or
cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement
of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and
subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or
document.
17. Miscellaneous
A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consult-
ant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City
to any contractual agreements whatsoever.
B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15 is marked, the
Consultant and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State
of California or some other state as a licensed real estate
broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that
neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate
brokers or salespersons.
C. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted
to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All
notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be
deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served
or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party,
2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
November 2, 1993 Page 9
/~/f
postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt
requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of
business for each of the designated parties.
D. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with any other written document
referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement
and understanding between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof
may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an
instrument in writing executed by the party against which
enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
E. Capacity of Parties
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and
represents to the other party that it has legal authority and
capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this
Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been
taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
F. Governing Law/Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action
arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only
in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State
of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as
close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and
performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
[end of page. next page is signature page.]
2pty9 . wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 10
/'
//~J~
Signature Page
to
Agreement between City of Chula Vista and
Marty Chase
for updating the City of Chula Vista Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee Program and Fire Station Master Plan
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this
Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood
same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
Dated:
, 19
City of Chula Vista
by:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
John M. Kaheny, City Attorney
Dated:
By:
Marty Chase
Exhibit List to Agreement
(X ) Exhibit A.
) Exhibit B:
2pty9.wp
November 2,
Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision)
1993 Page 11
//- /~
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
Marty Chase
1. Effective Date of Agreement: January 14, 1997
2. City-Related Entity:
(X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of
the State of California ("City")
3. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista,
276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 91910
4. Consultant:
Marty Chase
5. Business Form of Consultant:
(X ) Sole Proprietorship
( ) Partnership
( ) Corporation
6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant:
745 Dennis Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
426-3017
7. General Duties:
The City of Chula Vista adopted a public facilities
development impact fee program (hereinafter "PFDIF" or "DIF")
in 1989 (Ordinance 2320). This program was subsequently
amended by Ordinances 2432 and 2554. This program is intended
to identify the public facilities required to support future
development within the City of Chula Vista's general planning
area through a projected build-out year of 2010, with a
currently projected cost of $72 million, split between new
development and city shares. This request is for proposals to
assemble current data and revise facility needs and cost
2PTY9-.A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 1
/)//7
projections to update: the PFDIF, related ordinances, and the
City's Fire Station Master Plan.
The public facilities currently included in the PFDIF are:
* Civic Center Expansion
* Police Department Expansion and Improvements
* Corporation Yard Relocation
* Libraries
* Fire Suppression System
* Geographic Information System (GIS)
* Mainframe Computer
* Telephone System Upgrade
* Records Management System
It is the City's intent that the cost of these facilities be
shared among the various beneficiaries of the facilities. In
cases where the existing population creates a need for a
facility, the cost associated with this "City Share" will be
borne by the City of Chula Vista on behalf of existing
residents. The City share represents a deficiency to be made
up by the City and/or the provision by the City of a new
facility that benefits both existing and future residents. On
the other hand, where future development creates an additional
facility need for the new residents, the cost associated with
this new need is apportioned to the future development in the
form of a fee, and represents the DIF share.
This program was structured to be consistent with the goals of
AB 1600 (1987; Government Code 66000 et seq.).
Updates to the program are to be consistent with changes in:
state law, Chula Vista planning area boundaries, projected
Chula Vista public facility needs, cost estimates for those
facilities, and equivalent dwelling units (EDUs) of existing
and future development.
8. Scope of Work and Schedule:
A. Detailed Scope of Work:
Including but not limited to:
1. PFDIF UPDATE
a.
Updating development data and corresponding
equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) proj ections.
This update shall specifically include
consideration of the western portions of the
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 2
/J~J ~
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
b.
Otay Ranch project area (approximately 9,100
acres) subject to pending annexation into the
City (hereinafter "Otay Ranch") .
Updating all project
revised development
related costs.
specifications based on
data and calculating
1) Staffing proj ections: In concert with
staff from affected departments,
CONTRACTOR shall reevaluate the staffing
ratios used in PFDIF or applicable master
plans to project for facility space
needs. The revised staffing ratios shall
take into account: 1) downsizing which
has occurred throughout the City
organization since the original master
plan(s) were developed and 2) staffing
formulas or other operational policies or
guidelines.
2) Space proj ections: Using the updated
staffing forecasts, CONTRACTOR shall
project the aggregate building, parking,
storage and other space needs to serve
the City's buildout population. These
projections shall also include
consideration of existing or proposed
square footage ratios, design
considerations associated with current
master plan(s), and anticipated facility
construction/relocation sites. Data
shall also be broken down for each PFDIF
component and affected department.
3) Equipment Projections: CONTRACTOR shall
update estimates of related capital
equipment needs for each PFDIF component.
4) Costs: CONTRACTOR shall compute updated
cost estimates for all projects.
c.
Reassessing pre-existing City deficiencies
using updated standards and ratios of city
versus new development shares.
d.
Reassessing City cost shares on joint benefit
projects.
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 3
)///;
e. Updating development and project phasing
schedules as applicable, including
consideration of availability of funds from
existing PFDIF balances and fee credits,
future PFDIF payments or in-kind
contributions, and City-share contributions.
f. Additional Considerations: Police
g. Police Workload and Staffing: CONTRACTOR
shall review police call for service (CFS)
data, project CFS rates for the developing
areas, and update the City's patrol staffing
and support formulas as necessary. Based on
this data, CONTRACTOR shall forecast the
increase in sworn and non-sworn police
staffing needed to serve new development.
2. FIRE STATION MASTER PLAN
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
a.
Detail the number of fire stations (and fire
companies) which will be needed to serve
existing City areas, the development covered
in the City's current Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) program, and
development in the Otay Ranch such that
response time, capital and operating costs are
optimized.
b.
Determine the optimal, permanent location for
Ci ty Fire Station #6. This station is
presently located in an interim facility
within the EastLake-I development.
c.
Identify primary and, if applicable, secondary
sites for all new fire stations which will be
needed to serve the developing areas.
d.
Identify primary and, if applicable, secondary
sites for any existing fire stations which are
recommended to be relocated to more optimal
sites as part of the revised Master Plan.
e.
Develop a Fire Station Phasing Plan which
details the time line for constructing new
fire stations and/or relocating existing
stations. The Phasing Plan shall be based on
specific residential and/or
commercial/industrial buildout levels.
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 4
)/- 2//
3.
4.
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
f. Identify existing City fire stations which
will require major remodeling by (or prior to)
the year 2010, detail those improvements and
provide related cost data.
g. Develop a Fire Station Financing plan
detailing potential funding sources and
budgeting plans for constructing new fire
stations and relocating or remodeling existing
fire stations.
h. Assist City staff in detailing the fire-
related capital equipment needed to serve new
development.
i. Calculate the costs of all fire-related
projects to be included in the PFDIF and
update the fee for the fire component of the
PFDIF. Include in this calculation
consideration of fire communications towers,
as currently included in the PFDIF, or other
communications technology (e.g. 800 MHz) .
J. Using updated development data, reassess the
Ci ty share of cost on PFDIF proj ects which
jointly benefit new development and the pre-
existing City.
k. Assess the adequacy of the City's present fire
threshold and performance guidelines and the
methods of measuring those guidelines.
ORDINANCE CHANGES. It is anticipated that in
relation to the update and/or recent changes in
state law, it may be necessary to update various
sections of the City's ordinances or Municipal Code
to implement the intent of the update. The
CONTRACTOR shall prepare all such amendments for
consideration by the City Council.
MEETINGS. CONTRACTOR shall participate in meetings
with staff, other interested parties (e. g. from
Chamber of Commerce, development industry), and
Council to present and discuss finding and
recommendations. Minor amendments to the requested
documents or work product arising from such
meetings shall be included as part of the
contracted scope of work. Any additional reports
required to be prepared following such meetings
shall be provided at an hourly rate of compensation
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 5
)//;Lj
as provided in the Rate Schedule for Additional
Services, Section 10.D.
B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services:
( ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
(X) Other: No later than 10 davs from effective date of
aqreement
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
As specified per compensation schedule (Sections 10.A.
and 10.B below) and date for completion of all Consultant
services (Section B.D. below).
D. Date for completion of all Consultant services:
No later than 175 davs from effective date of aqreement
E. Stipulations/Exceptions
2PTY9-A. wp
June 7, 1995
1.
Updating Facility/Design Plans: As outlined, it is
CONTRACTOR's responsibility to determine buildout
space needs for various City facilities. It is the
CITY's responsibility to determine how these space
needs are best met, to develop preliminary
facility/design plans if needed for costing
purposes, and if necessary, to formally update the
design components of the Civic Center Master Plan;
the facility component of the Police Facility
Master Plan, the Corporation Yard Master Plan and
the Library Master Plan. At the request of City
staff, CONTRACTOR shall provide up to 40 (forty)
hours of assistance on the aforementioned plan
updates. Any CONTRACTOR involvement in the
design/facility plan updates beyond 40 hours shall
be reimbursed at hourly rates as specified under
Rate Schedule for Additional Services, Section
10.D.
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 6
//~ ;2;2
9. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant:
A. General:
1. Maps and development data for the Otay Ranch and
non-Otay Ranch projects
2. Average daily trip (ADT)/land use data
3. Copies of current facility master plans (and backup
files as needed and available) and Growth
Management Program
B. Component 1 - Civic Center Expansion
1. Up-to-date staffing and workload/performance
measures for civic Center departments and/or
divisions
2. Identification of department/division positions as
fixed or variable based on the City's full cost
recovery formulas
3. Up-to-date building plans (with room dimensions)
for the Civic Center complex and the El Dorado
office building
C. Component 2 - Police Facilities and Equipment
1. Police data as needed to update the patrol staffing
formula and to project call for service demand in
the developing areas
2. Up-to-date building plans (with room dimensions)
for the police building
D. Component 3 - Corporation Yard Relocation
1. Up-to-date staffing and workload measures for the
Public Works' divisions
2. Identification of division positions as fixed or
variable based on the City's full cost recovery
formulas
E. Component 4 - Library System
1. Detailed actual cost breakdowns for construction of
South Chula Vista library
F. Component 6,7,8,9 - Geographic Information System
Mainframe Computer Upgrade
Telephone System Upgrade
Records Management System
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 7
//-;23
1. Descriptive information and cost data for the
various projects included under PFDIF component 6,
7, 8 and 9.
G. Component 10 - General Administration
1. Up-to-date data on all charges and encumbrances
made against the PFDIF by component and/or project.
10. Compensation:
(X) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant
as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the
amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables
set forth below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount: $69,000, payable as follows:
Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed
Fee
A. PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF UPDATE:
1. Development data and
EDU projections are updated
$4,600
2. Staffing Projections are updated for:
a. Civic Center Departments other than
Police
b. Police Department
$6,900
$4,600
3. Space Projections
a (1) .
Civic Center Complex-Buildinqs. Buildout
square footage projections are completed
for departments/ divisions located in
City Hall and the Public Services
Building.: $3,450
a (2) .
Civic Center Complex-Parkinq. Buildout
parking space projections are
completed. $1,150
b.
Police Facilitv. Buildout
projections are completed.
space
$2,300
c.
Libraries. Buildout
are completed.
space proj ections
$2,300
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 8
//-.2 (
d.
Corporation Yard.
are completed.
Buildout space projections
$2,300
Project Cost: Cost projections
development shares are completed
PFDIF component:
and City/new
for each MAJOR
4.
a.
b.
c.
d.
Civic Center Expansion
Police Facility and Equipment
Corporation Yard Relocation
Library System
$3,450
$2,300
$1,150
$1,150
Cost proj ections and City/new development shares
are completed for the following.
MINOR PFDIF Components:
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
Geographic Information System
Mainframe Computer Upgrade
Telephone System Upgrade
Records Management System
General Administration
$1,150
$1,150
$1,150
$0
$0
5.
A preliminary PFDIF update report
with the revised fee components.
is submitted,
$2,300
6.
City Council adopts the PFDIF Update.
$4,600
B. FIRE FACILITIES MASTER PLAN UPDATE
1. Preliminary report delivered to staff (subj ect to
interim monthly advances as specified
below) : $17,250
2.
Presentation of report to
Oversight Commission and other
groups
Growth Management
applicable
$2,300
3. Final report, presentation to City Council for
their adoption, including calculation of fire
components of Public Facilities DIF. $3,450
C. (X) Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make
interim monthly advances against the compensation
due for Phase B. 1. (Fire Facilities Preliminary
report) on a percentage of completion basis such
that, at the end of that phase only the
compensation for that phase has been paid. Any
payments made hereunder shall be considered as
interest free loans which must be returned to the
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 9
/ / ~ ;2~
City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed.
If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City
shall receive credit against the compensation due
for that phase. The retention amount or percentage
set forth in Paragraph 18 is to be applied to each
interim payment such that, at the end of the phase,
the full retention has been held back from the
compensation due for that phase. Percentage of
completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole
and unfettered discretion by the Contracts
Administrator designated herein by the City, or
such other person as the City Manager shall
designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the
City that has been provided, but in no event shall
such interim advance payment be made unless the
Contractor shall have represented in writing that
said percentage of completion of the phase has been
performed by the Contractor. The practice of
making interim monthly advances shall not convert
this agreement to a time and materials basis of
payment.
D.
Rate Schedule for Additional Services
For any "Additional Services" pursuant
1.D. of the Agreement, Consultant
compensated as follows:
to Section
shall be
Category of Employee/
Consultant
Name
Rate
Owner/Principal
Martv Chase
$50 per hour
11. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant
in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay
Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below:
(X) None, the compensation includes all costs.
12. Contract Administrators:
City:
George Krempl
Deputy City Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista CA 91910
691-5031
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 10
/ j- 02 ;;
Consultant:
Marty Chase
745 Dennis Avenue
426-3017
13. Liquidated Damages Rate:
$ per day.
Other:
14. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant
Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code:
Reporting
X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
15. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
16. Permitted Subconsultants:
None
17. Bill Processing:
A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following
period of time:
) Monthly
) Quarterly
X) Other: Monthlv or more frequent1v as phases are
completed
B.
Day
(
(
(
(
of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing:
) First of the Month
) 15th Day of each Month
) End of the Month
X) Other: First of the Month or more frequentlv as
phases are completed
C. City's Account Number:
18. Security for Performance
Performance Bond, $
Letter of Credit, $
Other Security:
Type:
Amount: $
Retention.
notwithstanding
( X)
If this space
other provisions
is
to
checked, then
the contrary
2PTY9-A.wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 11
//'2 ?
requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant
sooner, the City shall be entitled to retain, at their
option, either the following IIRetention Percentage!! or
"Retention Amount" until the City determines that the
Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred:
x) Retention Percentage: 10%
) Retention Amount: $
Retention Release Event:
( X) Completion of All Consultant Services
( ) Other:
2PTY9-.A. wp
June 7, 1995
Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement
Page 12
///.26'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item No. 12
Date January 14, 1997
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 18543 Adopting the Siting Element of the County of San Diego
Integrated Waste Management Plan (continued from January 7, 1997).
SUBMITTED BY: Michael T. Meacham ~
Conservation Coordinator n
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~({ \'J1.X [tern
u 4/5th Vote: Yes No-.X..
BACKGROUND: At the January 7, 1997 Council Meeting the City Council considered the
Countywide Summary Plan and requested that Staff provide additional information before
approving the Countywide Siting Element. Council specifically requested that information
regarding the County's request for a 3,500 ton per day limit at the Otay Landfill/Otay Landfill
Annex and how that may effect the quantity and origin of waste disposed at the facilities.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Resolution adopting the Countywide Siting
Element with the revisions expressing the City's concerns regarding the origin of waste disposed at
the Otay Landfill. Staff further recommends that staff meet with the County including Supervisor
Cox's Office, to review options regarding the origin of waste accepted at the Otay landfill facilities.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: The Resource Conservation Commission reviewed and
recommended Council approval of the Source Reduction and Recycling, and Household Hazardous
Waste Elements at their January 9, 1995 meeting.
DISCUSSION: There are two separately permitted landfill facilities in the region, the Otay Landfill
and the Otay Landfill Annex. The vast majority of the future disposal capacity at the two landfills
is in the "Otay Landfill Annex" which is in the County of San Diego. The "Otay Landfill" is in the
City of Chula Vista currently but will be de-annexed concurrently with the annexation of the Otay
Ranch. This landfill has not accepted any waste for approximately three years and has a very
limited amount of space remaining under its current permit. If all the waste generated in the South
Bay were placed in its existing cells its remaining capacity would be completely filled in a few
months. The County is requesting that the operating permits for the two Landfills be combined as
one facility and that the capacity be increased from approximately 600 tons per day for the Otay
Landfill, and 2,500 tons per day for the Otay Landfill Annex to 3,500 tons per day for the entire
facility. That request for increased daily tonnage will be reviewed by the Local Enforcement
Agency and the California Integrated Waste Management Board. The permit criteria for a daily
tonnage increase is based primarily on the physical ability of the landfill and access roads to safely
handle the tonnage requested.
As an example the factors that are considered in determining the daily capacity include:
. Traffic: can the access roads to the landfill handle the tnlck traffic,
/02~/
Page 2, Item No....ll...
Date January 14. 1997
. Geometry, Stage Development and Operating Face: is there sufficient space and land
configuration to safely handle the daily tonnage,
. Existing Conditions: Conditional Use Permit (CUP), Environmental Impact Report(EIR) ,
Report of Disposal Site (RDS); do these documents prohibit or support future expansion of
the daily tonnage.
The Otay Landfill Annex is currently operating under a Notice and Order (temporary permit) to
accept up to 2,500 tons per day. The landfill actually accepts between 850 to 1,000 tons per day.
The increase to 2,500 tons per day was granted by the State based on an estimate in the original
application for the facility that projected a waste generation increase of up to 2,500 tons per day.
The waste currently disposed at the Otay Landfill Annex is generated by the following
jurisdictions which are listed in rank order beginning with the largest waste contributor: Chula
Vista, San Diego, San Diego County, National City, Coronado, Imperial Beach, Lemon Grove,
La Mesa and Mexico (Attachment A). Under current market conditions it is not likely that cities
at the far ends of the County would transport waste to Otay when they can obtain a lower
combined rate for transportation and disposal by using Miramar Landfill, Sycamore Landfill,
Orange County Landfills or other out of County landfills.
CONCLUSION:
ChuIa Vista is the third largest customer of the solid waste system and an important source of
revenue to the system. Using Chula Vista's position as a long time customer and key source of
revenue to the system may be a more effective method of intluencing the amount and origin of
waste that comes to local facilities than not approving the Countywide Siting Element.
Options.
I) Council may approve the Siting Element with the recommended changes to Attachment B.
2) Council may choose to not approve the Siting Element.
3) Council may choose to take no action.
If option one (I) is exercised the Countywide Summary Plan will be submitted to the State and the
City's comments will become a matter of record. If option two (2) is exercised the County will
submit the Plan to the State and our comments will become a matter of record. If a majority of the
cities with a majority of the waste in the county disapprove the Plan the State may require the
County to revise the Plan. If option three (3) is chosen and no actIon is taken by Council by January
14,1997 (within 90 days of receipt of the documents) Chula Vista will have been deemed to have
approved the Plan. The County will then submit the documents to the State without any additional
comment from the City
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of approving the resolution. The
County of San Diego is subject to civil penalties of up to $ I 0,000 per day for failure to develop and
/,2 ~ c2
Page 3, Item No. 12
Date January 14. 1997
implement a County Integrated Waste Management Plan. The Siting Element is one component
of that Plan. If a fine were to be imposed the County could seek to recover the cost through the
tipping fee paid by users of the solid waste system.
mtm:cas-rcc
otay-ton.rpt
Attachments
/2 -J
RESOLUTION NO. 18543
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE SITING ELEMENT OF THE
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO INTEGRATED WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City Council received a copy of the County
of San Diego Integrated Waste Management Plan Final Draft and the
County Board's letter, minutes and resolution adopting the Summary
Plan on October 24, 1996; and
WHEREAS, the Plan consists of the County-wide Summary
Plan and Siting Element Final Draft; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Countywide Siting Element is
to demonstrate a plan for the proper disposal of all waste
generated within the County for at least the next fifteen years;
and
WHEREAS, the siting Plan explains that "tentative" sites
must be consistent with local general plans and they must be
removed from the list within five years of the adoption of the plan
if the affected jurisdiction does not provide a resolution,
notarized statement or affidavit regarding land use consistency;
and
WHEREAS, staff has brought the issue to the County's
attention and they have subsequently added a footnote to the Wolf
Canyon and North Otay Valley sites; and
WHEREAS, these sites are inconsistent with the Otay Ranch
General Development Plan and the Subregional Plan and staff
recommends that they be removed from the tentative list following
the five year review process; and
WHEREAS, the Notice and Order establishes a daily tonnage
limit of 2,500 tons per day for the Otay Landfill Annex based on
population growth projections for the South Bay region; and
WHEREAS, the actual waste disposal at the Otay Landfill
and Otay Landfill Annex for the past six years has averaged only
1,000 tons per day and during that time waste disposal has declined
by approximately 40% in the region.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista recommends that the daily tonnage limit be
based on a review of the actual waste disposal over the past six
years, the Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and projected
population growth for the South Bay.
/2-Y
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the city council of the city of
Chula vista does hereby adopt the Siting Element of the County of
San Diego Integrated Waste Management Plan with the comment that
the Wolf Canyon and North otay Valley sites be removed from the
tentative list following the five year review process.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Michael T. Meacham, Conservation
Coordinator
rney
C:\rs\siting.pln
J.2-S-
Changes proposed for Attachment D
"WHEREAS the Notice and Order establishes a daily tonnage limit of 2,500 tons per day for the
Otay Landfill Annex based on population growth projections for the South Bay region, and
WHEREAS the actual waste disposal at the Otay Landfill and Otay Landfill Annex for the past six
years has averaged only 1,000 tons per day and during that time waste disposal has declined by
approximately 40% in the region,
THEREFORE the City recommends that the daily tonnage limit he based on a review of the actual
waste disposal over the past six years, the Source Reduction and Recycling Elements and projected
population growth for the South Bay."
/.2~~
(ATTACHMENT A)
Total System Weight
Mixed and Clean Green Tonnage November 1996
San Marcos % Ramona % otav % Sycamore % Borreao % Total %
COUNTY Mixed 8,569.4 0.2 2,582.2 0.8 3,680.5 0.1 9,717.0 0.5 189.8 0.7 24,738.9 0.3
Green 147.6 0.0 118.1 0.0 134.8 0.0 353.2 0.0 79.5 0.3 833.2 0.0
CARLSBAD Mixed 7,518.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,521.1 0.1
Green 94,1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94.1 0.0
CHULA VISTA Mixed 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 8,649.6 0.3 27.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8,677,9 0.1
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 193.5 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 193,5 0,0
CORONADO Mixed 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,494.9 0.1 14.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,523.2 0.0
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.2 0.0
DEL MAR Mixed 447,1 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 430.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 877.4 0.0
Green 14.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 14.9 0.0
EL CAJON Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.7 0.0 1,315.8 0.1 0.0 0.0 1,332.3 0.0
Gr_ 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 84.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 85.2 0.0
ENCINITAS Mixed 5,004,8 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7,7 0.0 0.0 0.0 5,012.3 0.1
Green 134.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 134.4 0.0
ESCONDIDO Mixed 1,537.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 156.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,696.8 0.0
Green 91,1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.8 0.0 0,0 0.0 100.3 0.0
IMPERIAL BEACH Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,157.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,157,7 0,0
Green 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0,0
LA MESA Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 227.1 0.0 3,483.8 0.2 0.0 0.0 3,710.9 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 54.5 0.0 0.0 0,0 55,8 0.0
LEMON GROVE Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 831.8 0.0 766.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,598.3 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.5 0.0 10.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.8 0.0
NATIONAL CITY Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,708.7 0.1 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 3,709.8 00
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 0.0
OCEANSIDE Mixed 1,001.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,008.2 0.0
Green 19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 00
POWAY Mixed 789.4 0.0 504.3 0.2 0.6 0.0 1,355.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 2,649.7 0.0
Green 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.0 0,0 0.0 2,3 0.0
SAN DIEGO Mixed 635.2 0.0 56.7 0.0 6,845.4 0.3 1,321.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 9,056.3 0.1
Green 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 218.9 0.0 47.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 289.3 0,0
SAN MARCOS Mixed 4,984.0 0,1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 4,989.0 0,1
Green 151.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 151.8 0.0
SANTEE Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2,017.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 2,017.9 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 92.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 93.3 0.0
SOLANA BEACH Mixed 1,073.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 20.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 1,093.6 00
Green 9.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.0 0.0
VISTA Mixed 6,036.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 6,042.4 0.1
Green 114.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 115.1 00
OTHER COUNTY Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
MEXICO Mixed 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 106.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 106.7 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
NO CITY Mixed 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 0.0
Green 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0
Jur. Mixed 37,810.1 98.0% 3,143.2 98.4% 26,722.1 97,7% 20,659.1 96.9% 189.8 70.5% 88,524.3 97.5%
JUr. Green 781.9 2.0% 118.5 3.6% 621.6 2.3% 852.8 3.1% 79.5 29.5% 2,254.3 2.5%
Total Jur. Tons 38,592.0 100.0% 3,261.7 100.0% 27,343.7 100.0% 21,311.9 100.0% 269.3 100.0% 90,778,6 100.0%
/.2/ ?