Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1983-11420 . './ RESOLUTION NO. 11420 .~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA ,vISTA APPROVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME RESIDENTIAL USE OF LOT 332, HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, in May of 1980, the City Council approved the tentative subdivision map for Hidden Vista Village, and WHEREAS, one of the conditions of this approval was that prior to the development of Lot 332, evidence was to be submitted to the City Council which supported residential land use rather than commercial, and WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a market analysis which indicates that the present commercial area is adequate to serve the area, and WHEREAS, there is a definite need for low arid moderate income housing. .' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the development of Lot 332 of Hidden Vista Village for 232 low and moderate income housing unit. " , Approved as to form by Presented by ~; '/7 n '0----J1 /, B'ud Gray, Planning fb Dire~ " ~ (~as J. Harron, City Attorney ',' f " " .. .' / ." c I ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of 'October 19 83, by the following vote, to_it: AYES: ..' Councilmen Malcolm, Cox, Moore, McCandliss, Scott NAYES: ABSTAI N: ABSENT: Councilmen None Councilmen None Councilmen None " Ma ATTEST ~~~ t/ City Clerk fl., the City of Chula Vista STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s. , CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 11420 ,and that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED ( seal) City Clerk CC-660 ! / ,. r--l rVery...LOW AT--, I : I DenSIty /. , .-r"\.. " Open Space ,-__.J ",., I 1'. ,''" ,.-._._.....~:~;;~ l:.~:i~;r..'-:,,::~'Pi.~l I::::::;' ~f>,,' ~;a:a':Q,)..., ' ~ Jr High School · \, 'S'-nlf. ' -/~>~ " ,PROJE~r ~ Rec~<0i'~8.1> AREA Open Space ""../ ,,<' , . "~Z8'0 -- -- -- ~i J , i' " . ',; I I I I I i I Ii c.\ EXHIBIT A I i L--~~--~I t-/o -?CAt:""'-' 14Jlfillf.!JTU" au U ifll, )flli , ",";" 'f"";: ". ", ,':: " ,.::rl,;: ,<:'J, >""::::,:,:2.;'/ ,;~;..:"~. ". .::S..::':,:f;:~: . ..~ .' ~, , ..0...'., ;~ .~!~,0~t?:."1.-'~"-':<.""'~_'_-" "",' ,_, "o'~, ':'~~ko:;':f~..C'l;.:;::t{~"..o~..~~....~';ou,\,,;~..,.,~,G.;:l:~:>~tCf "".'~' '...., ~,I...... ,". _,,'_ '.'J"..,.(~i:-,'_l._'io-";"'h '~~'"..'';:;_..~......u,\:"''t-"__.~._~.,,_.,^,,,,,_-,.~~ .. :-'~ :;-;\~ .: .::' , '.- -, ::'";1-' :~ ,; ;--.~.:'~ ~~ ::::: t\~~t~1~~' - \1 i;~~t~:: II .. - -, ..' .t 11 . ;..>:.~.:..,... '; \ ~ ~ ,~;,'-';i~ - I , . uo, J -. ~-~_-:~~.-~i~; ~~; ...-...,....,...'- -'::".=.-':f;.: i-I' B:il III 1II1IIblil::t.ItI::i:i:lii::!llj:;. ............................... ~I rr--', '1~:i'1 f; I ., '"HI:-, .. , 0--_ ~ I ,~ll~T - -'~' . -I- . , .~~ . - h- ......'. f1: ~~ , : ~ ~ .. ~ .. ~ti l:i ~lI) '-- . ".,' ,,-~ . _', 11... ,- ~.: - -......, ,::.' ....-.,c.:.. z'; , ~ ~ ., , c ~ .- , =:-;:===-f-.:-.....'-.--. ~~1 :, II ::f. g, J..1: 1(.( I~ r f .,--==;~-;---;:..."":r'"':i-_...,.~~_ .. ! ri I'.' . ' ,;.. './ j,', ...... ..... }].-~ (-". )f.- //c/;':i -"".." '.".~ ~ ';....._..h..~:'..."":'."': '. ~::,"' 'h '1 ~ I .t .,',t" . I I - i . . . I ~ ~ f I ~ , i I I ;. l;. , 'c ~ ~ EXTRACT: Commerci a 1 . Reta H Market Ana lys i s Hidden Vista Village - July 1983 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES . CHAPTER I I SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 1. The Chula Vista retail sector is mature and reasonably well sG0plied with most types of merchants. " The city of Chula Vista" however, experiences outleakages in taxable retail sales potential in several key categories - eating and drinking establishments, liquor stores, home furnishings and appliances, building materials and farm Implements outlets, the auto sector, and the "other" retail sector. Competition in the automobile sector represented by the Mile of Cars in National City probably precludes development of an auto deal~rship on the subject site. Such a retail use, however, is independent of the site's development potential for a neighborhood-scale shopping center predicated on the population base in the site area. 2. A strict interpretaion of the consumer expenditure potential of the market area's population base in light of the existing inventory of food store sales area indicates no strong basis for anticipating that a supermarket at the site would generate exceptional sales. Nonetheless, the site's excellent visibility and access, and its key location Yiith regard to the residential areas developing east of the site probably override the supply and demand conditions ifl the trade area's food sales sector, suggesting the strong probability that a supermarket anchor tenant could be attracted to the site supporting the development of a neighborhood-scale /(-II'I/-.(/ - ..3 - t' ~~ .. ":"/" _ J, 'r,t'~'>. '.: -- .lll r"' .~ :~ f; ~ l.~ H fl'~ ,,,,'-', ji$:. :1 ri~ [4 "I it r.;I:, Jf [I! ~i :1 ("..' 1",' 'ff In ~t rr b~ ~rf t'~- -:';,\~:':= 'rf ~..'.!.~".'. pJ/! :..,~] I \;.:\;. L:tJ- ,I t~ rpc>:, ~~~ ,I ~'" lie ~ i I r;..'.'. t'~ T" . ALFRED GOBARASSOCIATES sh~PPing center with a total of about 100,000 square feet of retail fl~or area at present. A pro forma tenant mix for such a shopping center would be approximately as follows: . Square Feet Total 30,000 15,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 10,000 6,000 5,000 2,000 15,000 100,000 Supermarket (Anchor Tenant) Hardware, Home Improvement Stores Specialty Food Stores, Liquor, etc. Tires, Batteries, Accessories and other Auto, Boat, Motorcycle, etc. Furniture and Appliance Stores Eating and Drinking Establishments Nu rsery Commercial Bank Personal Services Miscellaneous 3. Be~ause of the expected increase in population in the trade area for a center located at the subject site, provision should be made for eventual expansion of the center by approximately 50,000 square feet to a total level of 150,000 square feet, exclusive of the potential at the site for a service station. , 4. Because of the general market circumstances in the site area's hotel/motel sector and the excellent access and visibility of the site itself, there should be an opportunity to develop a hotel/motel operation on the site absorbing about 5.0 acres for a 200-room lodging facility. 5. Larger scale retail development predicated on general merchandise , " stores as anchors - a community-scale center, etc. - is not an attractive possibility in light of the existing inventory of general merchandise stores located in two regional centers b> l.~ ~ .", L~ I' t:J , - 4 - ~' :V:j' :..;, g = I<-;! 'jtJ-.?J ..,. :. .",'-:?i':~(" """~.I "--,.",,' ," -: ~ I , " I I I , I I I i ~ i , ~ ~ I ; " ~ , ,- ~ " ~ .' i ~ ~~ :,,:: ~ ". oi~ ALFRED GOBAK AssociATES c~rrently operating in the site area. In addition to the general m~rchandise anchors at the regional centers, there are several , , strong freestanding general merchandise stores operating in the same general market area, restricting the probability that the market can support effectively a significant expansion of the '1 general merchandise retailing sector in the immediate vicinity. 6. Historically, retailers in this portion of San Diego County have received substantial support from Mexican shoppers. This consumer element is expected to be much less viable in the future than it has been in the past because of the domestic economic policies which will almost certainly be imposed on Mexico's national economy in light of Mexico's tremendous external debt and the consequent need to minimize imports and maximize 'exports over a fairly protracted period. 7. Ih total, the combination of development opportunities that'appears to be reasonably feasible and the indicated level of expansion of retail facilities that will be supportable with the population increase in the site area justify reserving about 25.0'acres of the site for commercial development. Shopping facilities to be developed at the site should be designed for phased expansion concurrent with the absorption of housing on the balance of the subject property and at locations east of the subject property. 8. Development of part of the site for office'space does not offer prospects of significant absorption or financial benefit in light of alternative uses for the site. - 5 - j{ lIyz..v