HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1983-11420
.
'./
RESOLUTION NO.
11420
.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
,vISTA APPROVING LOW AND MODERATE INCOME RESIDENTIAL
USE OF LOT 332, HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, in May of 1980, the City Council approved the
tentative subdivision map for Hidden Vista Village, and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions of this approval was
that prior to the development of Lot 332, evidence was to be
submitted to the City Council which supported residential land
use rather than commercial, and
WHEREAS, the developer has submitted a market analysis
which indicates that the present commercial area is adequate to
serve the area, and
WHEREAS, there is a definite need for low arid moderate
income housing.
.'
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the development of
Lot 332 of Hidden Vista Village for 232 low and moderate income
housing unit.
"
,
Approved as to form by
Presented by
~;
'/7 n
'0----J1
/,
B'ud Gray,
Planning
fb
Dire~
"
~
(~as J. Harron, City Attorney
',' f
"
"
..
.'
/
."
c
I
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 25th day of 'October
19 83, by the following vote, to_it:
AYES: ..' Councilmen Malcolm, Cox, Moore, McCandliss, Scott
NAYES:
ABSTAI N:
ABSENT:
Councilmen None
Councilmen None
Councilmen None
" Ma
ATTEST ~~~
t/ City Clerk
fl.,
the City of Chula Vista
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s.
, CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 11420
,and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
DATED
( seal)
City Clerk
CC-660
!
/
,.
r--l rVery...LOW AT--,
I : I DenSIty /. , .-r"\.. " Open Space
,-__.J ",., I 1'. ,''"
,.-._._.....~:~;;~ l:.~:i~;r..'-:,,::~'Pi.~l
I::::::;' ~f>,,' ~;a:a':Q,)..., ' ~ Jr High School
· \, 'S'-nlf.
' -/~>~
" ,PROJE~r ~ Rec~<0i'~8.1>
AREA Open Space ""../ ,,<'
, . "~Z8'0
-- --
--
~i
J
, i'
"
.
',;
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
Ii
c.\
EXHIBIT A
I
i
L--~~--~I
t-/o -?CAt:""'-'
14Jlfillf.!JTU"
au U ifll, )flli
,
",";" 'f"";:
". ", ,':: " ,.::rl,;: ,<:'J, >""::::,:,:2.;'/ ,;~;..:"~. ". .::S..::':,:f;:~: . ..~
.' ~, , ..0...'., ;~ .~!~,0~t?:."1.-'~"-':<.""'~_'_-" "",' ,_, "o'~, ':'~~ko:;':f~..C'l;.:;::t{~"..o~..~~....~';ou,\,,;~..,.,~,G.;:l:~:>~tCf
"".'~' '...., ~,I...... ,". _,,'_ '.'J"..,.(~i:-,'_l._'io-";"'h '~~'"..'';:;_..~......u,\:"''t-"__.~._~.,,_.,^,,,,,_-,.~~ ..
:-'~ :;-;\~ .: .::' ,
'.- -,
::'";1-'
:~ ,; ;--.~.:'~ ~~ :::::
t\~~t~1~~'
-
\1 i;~~t~:: II
.. - -, ..' .t 11
. ;..>:.~.:..,... ';
\ ~ ~ ,~;,'-';i~ - I
, . uo, J
-. ~-~_-:~~.-~i~; ~~;
...-...,....,...'-
-'::".=.-':f;.:
i-I'
B:il
III
1II1IIblil::t.ItI::i:i:lii::!llj:;.
...............................
~I rr--',
'1~:i'1 f; I
., '"HI:-,
.. ,
0--_ ~ I
,~ll~T
- -'~'
. -I-
. , .~~
. - h-
......'.
f1:
~~ ,
:
~ ~
.. ~
..
~ti
l:i
~lI)
'--
. ".,'
,,-~ .
_', 11...
,-
~.: -
-......, ,::.'
....-.,c.:..
z';
,
~
~
.,
,
c
~
.-
,
=:-;:===-f-.:-.....'-.--.
~~1
:, II
::f. g, J..1:
1(.( I~
r f .,--==;~-;---;:..."":r'"':i-_...,.~~_
.. !
ri
I'.'
. '
,;..
'./
j,',
......
..... }].-~
(-".
)f.- //c/;':i
-"".." '.".~ ~
';....._..h..~:'..."":'."':
'.
~::,"' 'h
'1
~
I
.t
.,',t"
.
I
I
-
i
.
.
.
I
~
~
f
I
~
,
i
I
I
;.
l;.
,
'c
~
~
EXTRACT:
Commerci a 1 . Reta H Market Ana lys i s
Hidden Vista Village - July 1983
ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES
. CHAPTER I I
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS
1. The Chula Vista retail sector is mature and reasonably well
sG0plied with most types of merchants.
"
The city of Chula Vista"
however, experiences outleakages in taxable retail sales potential
in several key categories - eating and drinking establishments,
liquor stores, home furnishings and appliances, building materials
and farm Implements outlets, the auto sector, and the "other"
retail sector. Competition in the automobile sector represented by
the Mile of Cars in National City probably precludes development of
an auto deal~rship on the subject site. Such a retail use,
however, is independent of the site's development potential for a
neighborhood-scale shopping center predicated on the population
base in the site area.
2. A strict interpretaion of the consumer expenditure potential of the
market area's population base in light of the existing inventory of
food store sales area indicates no strong basis for anticipating
that a supermarket at the site would generate exceptional sales.
Nonetheless, the site's excellent visibility and access, and its
key location Yiith regard to the residential areas developing east
of the site probably override the supply and demand conditions ifl
the trade area's food sales sector, suggesting the strong
probability that a supermarket anchor tenant could be attracted to
the site supporting the development of a neighborhood-scale
/(-II'I/-.(/
- ..3 -
t' ~~ .. ":"/"
_ J, 'r,t'~'>. '.: --
.lll
r"'
.~
:~
f;
~
l.~
H
fl'~
,,,,'-',
ji$:.
:1
ri~
[4
"I
it
r.;I:,
Jf
[I!
~i
:1
("..'
1",'
'ff
In
~t
rr
b~
~rf
t'~-
-:';,\~:':=
'rf
~..'.!.~".'.
pJ/!
:..,~]
I
\;.:\;.
L:tJ-
,I
t~
rpc>:,
~~~
,I
~'"
lie
~
i
I
r;..'.'.
t'~
T"
. ALFRED GOBARASSOCIATES
sh~PPing center with a total of about 100,000 square feet of retail
fl~or area at present. A pro forma tenant mix for such a shopping
center would be approximately as follows:
. Square Feet
Total
30,000
15,000
6,000
6,000
5,000
10,000
6,000
5,000
2,000
15,000
100,000
Supermarket (Anchor Tenant)
Hardware, Home Improvement Stores
Specialty Food Stores, Liquor, etc.
Tires, Batteries, Accessories and other
Auto, Boat, Motorcycle, etc.
Furniture and Appliance Stores
Eating and Drinking Establishments
Nu rsery
Commercial Bank
Personal Services
Miscellaneous
3.
Be~ause of the expected increase in population in the trade area
for a center located at the subject site, provision should be made
for eventual expansion of the center by approximately 50,000 square
feet to a total level of 150,000 square feet, exclusive of the
potential at the site for a service station.
,
4.
Because of the general market circumstances in the site area's
hotel/motel sector and the excellent access and visibility of the
site itself, there should be an opportunity to develop a
hotel/motel operation on the site absorbing about 5.0 acres for a
200-room lodging facility.
5.
Larger scale retail development predicated on general merchandise
,
"
stores as anchors - a community-scale center, etc. - is not an
attractive possibility in light of the existing inventory of
general merchandise stores located in two regional centers
b>
l.~ ~
.",
L~
I'
t:J
,
- 4 -
~'
:V:j'
:..;,
g
=
I<-;! 'jtJ-.?J
..,. :.
.",'-:?i':~(" """~.I "--,.",,' ," -: ~
I ,
"
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
i
~
i
,
~
~
I
;
"
~
,
,-
~
"
~
.'
i
~
~~
:,,::
~
".
oi~
ALFRED GOBAK AssociATES
c~rrently operating in the site area. In addition to the general
m~rchandise anchors at the regional centers, there are several
,
,
strong freestanding general merchandise stores operating in the
same general market area, restricting the probability that the
market can support effectively a significant expansion of the
'1
general merchandise retailing sector in the immediate vicinity.
6. Historically, retailers in this portion of San Diego County have
received substantial support from Mexican shoppers. This consumer
element is expected to be much less viable in the future than it
has been in the past because of the domestic economic policies
which will almost certainly be imposed on Mexico's national economy
in light of Mexico's tremendous external debt and the consequent
need to minimize imports and maximize 'exports over a fairly
protracted period.
7. Ih total, the combination of development opportunities that'appears
to be reasonably feasible and the indicated level of expansion of
retail facilities that will be supportable with the population
increase in the site area justify reserving about 25.0'acres of the
site for commercial development. Shopping facilities to be
developed at the site should be designed for phased expansion
concurrent with the absorption of housing on the balance of the
subject property and at locations east of the subject property.
8. Development of part of the site for office'space does not offer
prospects of significant absorption or financial benefit in light
of alternative uses for the site.
- 5 -
j{ lIyz..v