HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1975/10/28 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE
CITY OF CUULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. October 28, 1975
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held
on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 276 Fourth
Avenue, with the following
Councilmen present: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, Assistant City Manager Asmus, City Attorne.v
Lindberg, Director of Public Works Robens, Director of Planning
Peterson, Administrative Analyst Smith
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Pro Tempore Scott followed by a
moment of silent prayer,
APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded
by Mayor Pro Tempore Scott and unanimously
carried by those present that the minutes
of the meetings of October 15 and 21, 1975
be approved, copies having been sent to
each Councilman~
PRESENTATION OF SERVICE AWARD On behalf of the Elayor and the City Council,
TO GEORGE F, STALLARD, FIRE Mayor Pro Tempore Scott presented a 20-year
DEPARTMENT service pin to Engineer George F. Stallard
of the Fire Department.
'PRESENTATION OF THE PORT Port Commissioner, Mr. C. R. Campbell, made
COMMISSIONER, MR. C. R, CAMPBELL a brief presentation concerning the "J" Street
launching ramp area. He stated that the Environ-
mental Report consisting of more than 100
pages is still being worked on. It should
be ready for issuance within the next two to
three weeks and will be an important milestone
because the report will generate the official
responses from the many different agencies
to which it must be submitted for their
comments, criticisms and other remarks.
Mr. Campbell reviewed some statistics in
connection with the program. The area to be
dredged fs approximately 40 acres in size
and at low tide, more than 80% is above the
low water mark. There is an estimated one
million cubic yards of soil to be removed
from the area which is one of the reasons
for the delay to the project. A combination
island and wild life preserve is to be created
which will be approximately 80 to 100 acres.
There have been some engineering problems,
but they will be resolved. Mr. Campbell
further stated that the cost figures may now
be close to two and one-half million dollars.
The project is mov~ng and is considered by the
Port District as .one of the most important that
they have in terms of an unfinished pro~ect.
The schedule for completion is only approximately
two months later than reported previously.
(Mayor Hamilton came in at this time.)
City Council Meeting 2 October 28, 1975
In answer to a quest}on from Councilman Hyde,
~Ir. Campbell stated that they do not
anticipate any difficulty in terms of
approval by the Army Corps of Engineers,
and none of the agencies involved have
indicated that they would oppose the
project.
ORAL CO~qUNICATIONS
Mrs. Judy Sullivan Mrs. Sullivan and Mrs. Kelley requested that
162 Mankato Street the Council reconsider the decision to take
out the trees in the Mankato-Whitney Circle
Mrs, J. Kelley and that the Council hold another Council
167 Mankato Street Conference to find the best solution for the
City while still keeping the trees. They
stated that they were representing the
majority (a simple majority of 32 out of
63) of the home owners as shown on a petition
they had with them, and were asking that the
City keep the trees and let the City find
the best way to do it.
Discussion of problem Discussion followed by Council and staff,
including comments from Mrs. Sullivan and
Mrs. Kelley, concerning various alternatives
of solving the problem, and it was concluded
that the problem has not been resolved.
Motion It was moved by Councilman Egdahl that the
Council decision to remove the trees be held
in abeyance until such time as this new
information has been referred to and acted
upon by the Street Tree Committee and they
bring a proposal back to the Council and at
that time a Council conference be considered.
Notation to motion Councilman Hobel seconded the motion with
the notation that they also speak to any other
proposals and not just come forward and say,
"this is the proposal we have settled on."
Motion modified At the request of Councilman Hyde, the motion
was modified to have the matter referred to
staff and Street Tree Committee.
Motion carried The motion carried unanimously.
Nancy Petty, Tom Mount Ms, Petty and llr. Mount were representing
Our House, Inc. Our House, Inc. They presented the Council
666 Third Avenue members and the editors of Star-News and
San Diego Union with complimentary tickets
for the second annual "Our House Haunted
House" which will be held Thursday, October
30 and Friday, October 31.
Mrs, Margaret Nelton Mrs. Helton is Chairman of the Mayor's
162 Mankato Street ad hoc Advisory Committee on Aging. She
requested, in connection with the Human
Care Services Feasibility Study, that a
community task force or committee be
appointed to participate in the development
of any recommendations that might arise
out of the staff study so there would be
community as well as staff input. She stated
City Council Meeting -3- October 28, 1975
that many people, because of new Federal
regulations in Title VII~ XIX, and XX of
the Social Security Act, Revenue Sharing
Act and Community Development Block Grant
fund monies, there is much funding avail-
able to communities at this time that could
be brought into our community. She asked
that the Council take some action to
establish some kind of a community task
force or committee which would work with
staff in the development of anything that
mi, ght come before the Council.
Mayor Hamilton explained that the report
was only an interim report at this time.
There was no further discussion.
Human Relations Mrs. Helton stated the Human Relations
Commission Commission received a letter from the State
Conference on Community Human Relations
requesting that a representative serve
on the state planning committee. The
Human Relations Commission voted to have
Mrs. Helton represent them. She has
received a notice inviting her to a meeting
to be held Saturday, November 1, 1975 in
Burlingame. There are no funds in the
Human Relations Commis$ion budget for this
trip and it was suggested that she present
a request to the Council for funds to cover
airfare and luncheon.
Discussion The Council members discussed all factors
of principles involved involved in the request for funds,
in request including budget ~rocedures and necessity
for travel~
Motion to deny request ~t W~s m~ved by Counci, lman Eg~hl and
secondedbyi¢ou~cilm~n Hyde that the request
De denied or filed.
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Scott, Hamilton,
Hyde
Noes: Councilman I~obel
Absent: None
Joe Scannicchio Mr. Scannicchio presented the Council, on
President, Chula Vista behalf of the Cham~er of Commerce, th~ Seventh
Chamber of Commerce Annual Civic Information Buyers Guide. He
reviewed briefly some of the information
presented on various pages and stated that
35,000 copies of the booklet will be
distributed within the next three weeks to
all the residents of the area. They will also
be placed in the Tourist and Convention
Bureau. The booklet represents the total
business community.
David Burns Mr. Burns, President of the South Bay Irriga-
130 Whitney Street tion D~strict, commented that he hoped the
Chula Vista Council and Chamber of Commerce did recognize
the South Bay Irrigation District; that they
are elected by the citizens and perform a
public service.
City Council Meeting 4 October 28, 1975
PUBLIC HEARING - The City Council, on October 7, 1975 by
CONSIDERATION OF INTENTION Resolution ~o. 7914, established October 28,
TO VACATE A PORTION OF FIG 1975, as the date for a public hearing
AVENUE, SOUTH OF DAVIDSON vacating the easterly 19 feet of Fig Avenue,
STREET south of Davidson Street, There will be no
physical changes in the street configuration
as a result of the vacation. All adjacent
property will maintain existing access to
the public street.
Report on unavailability In response to the Council's earlier request
of parking space that staff investigate the matter and deter-
mine a means of controlling the parking, Director
of Public Works Robens reported that the parking
spaces marked on Fig Avenue - three for City
veh~cles~ three for visitors, two for the
Council and one for the Mayor - were often
not available during the day. The only way
availability could be accomplished is through
vacation of the street so that the City would
own the property and have the enforcement rights.
Public hearing opened This being the time and place as advertised,
Mayor Hamilton opened the public hearing.
Public hearing closed There being no comments either for or against
the vacation, ~layor Hamilton closed the
public hearing.
Motion to bring resolution It was moved by Councilman ~lyde and seconded
back by Councilman I~obel that a resolution be
brought back to the Council providing for
the vacation of the property.
Discussion of motion Councilman Scott spoke against the motion,
stating he felt a lot of parking space was
being placed in the private domain of staff
and City Council and could be used more
efficiently in the public domain thereby
being used by everyone.
Further discussion was held on the consequences
of issuing citations for people parking in
the marked area and the effectiveness of
posted signs. ~r. Robens stated that no
actual study had been made, but he had
observed that no real problem existed. Usu-
ally there are parking spaces available,
except on Thursdays. There is a lot of use
of the spaces by non-city and non-city hall
vehicles at all times.
Councilman Hyde commented that he could not
think of any public agency where there are
not some working spaces, limited perhaps,
but reasonable space provided for those
who have a need to be at the facility on a
regular basis. He did not feel it unreason-
able to have a few spaces allocated for
City vehicles and suggested that if motion
passed, a more obvious "~o Parking" sign
be prepared so that people will not get tickets.
City Council r~eeting 5 October 28, 1975
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Hobel, Hamilton
~loes: Councilmen Scott, Egdahl
Absent: None
PUBLIC HEARING - On August 26, 1975 the Zoning Administrator
CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL denied a request to vary from the Zoning
OF DENIAL OF REQUEST FOR Ordinance by increasing the rear yard
VARIANCE ZAV-75-8 TO coverage from 30% (allowed) to 59%. The
INCREASE REAR YARD Zoning Administrator was unable to make the
COVERAGE FROM 30% TO 59% necessary findings of hardship. The applicant,
AT 950 MELROSE AVENUE., ~lr. McCauley, appealed the Zoning Administrator's
HOWARD L~ AND KATHLEEN decision to the Planning Commission on Septem-
I~cCAULEY ber 24, 1975..
After hearing testimony from the applicant
and two neighbors the Planning Commission
upheld the denial of the variance and the
applicant appealed the Planning Commission's
decision to the Council.
Director of Planning Peterson explained that
the normal rear yard requirement in the R-1
Zone is 20 feet, but there is a provision in
the ordinance for encroaching into that
required rear yard to a depth of l0 feet
if the building addition covers no more than
30% of the required rear yard area. In this
case, the applicant constructed a patio or
sunshade area so that the total coverage of the
rear yard area is now 59%. Light and air and
circulation are the m~jor concerns..The
applicant's plan does not silow the overhead
cover and it was not discovered until inspec-
tion was made of the actual building addition.
Public hearing opened This being the time and place as advertised,
Mayor Hamilton opened the public hearing.
Howard McCauley Mr. McCauley stated that his written appeal
950 Melrose Avenue submitted to the Council together with the
pictures covered the situation. He asked
his attorney, Mr. ~iller, to represent him
at the hearing.
James E. Miller Mr. Miller presented a set of photographs
Attorney for the Council to review and offered various
4819 Whippom~ill Lane facts in support of the hardship determination
Bonita which the Council is being asked to make.
Mr. Miller commented that the matter of
coverage is undefined in the ordinance. The
slats allow for considerable amount of light
and air so it is not a roof to house the
interior space but is strictly an outdoor
type of lattice structure. There is no fire
hazard. Mr. Miller said that Mr. McCauley
had commendably improved a residence in the
City in good faith and with considerable
expense and was hopeful that the Council
would allow him to maintain the structure.
City Council Meeting 6 October 28, 1975
Ray Howard Mr. tloward lives in the house just behind
949 Maria Way Mr. McCauley. He pointed out that the
structure certainly does not destroy the
area in which they live and recommended
that the Council approve the variance.
James M. Darnell Mr. Darnell lives next to Mr. McCauley
954 Melrose and has view of the property every day.
He stated he could see nothing detrimental
to the structure and felt it was beneficial
from the standpoint of a property owner.
Council discussion Councilman Egdahl commented that the argument
of the staff and Planning Commission are
valid and good ones, however, the ordinance
does not specifically define what degree
of overhead coverage should be considered
a roof. He suggested that it be recognized
that this probably needs to be much more
clearly defined in the ordinance.
It was moved by Councilman Egdahl and seconded
MOtion to grant appeal by Councilman Scott that the appeal be granted.
Discussion of motion Further comments were made by Councilman
Egdahl saying that his intention is to follow
on with a second motion to revise that part
of the ordinance. ~{e thought it would serve
no purpose to remove the sunshade, but that it
does bring up the fact that a problem does
exist with the ordinance and revisions should
be made.
Councilman Hyde expressed concern that at a
later date someone could make a patio and
build on it, although at this point it is
obvious that its purpose is a sunshade.
Motion carried The motion to grant the appeal carried
unanimously.
Motion to revise It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded
ordinance by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
to consider amendments to the ordinance to
revise and correct that particular deficiency
defining the percentage of coverage (overhead)
which does define a roof structure for this
purpose.
CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Councilman Hyde that the
Consent Calendar be approved and adopted.
The mOtiOn carried.with Councilman Scott
VOting "no!' On Item No. 9, Resolution No. 7933.
RESOLUTION NO, 7929 - On September 25, 1975 Hubbard Construction
ACCEPTING STORM DRAIN Company, through their sub-contractor,
AND SEWER IN "J" STREET Long-Marker and Howley, completed the repair
BETWEEN EAST PARK LANE AND to the 48" and 54" corrugated metal pi~e in
CHURCH AVENUE "J" Street between East Park Lane and Fourth
Avenue. The total contract included the
construction of a sewer and storm drain in
"J" Street betwen East Park Lane and Church
Avenue. The Engineering Division made a
final inspection of the storm drain and
found that it met the project specifications
and recommended its acceptance.
City Council Meeting 7 October 28, 1975
RESOLUTION NO. 7930 - Trial Traffic Regulations have been in effect
ESTABLISNING BOULEVARD a minimum of eight (8) months at the inter-
STOP(S) AND/OR THROUGH sections of Telegraph Canyon Road and Buena
STREET(S) IN lt~E CITY Vista; Allen School Lane and Surrey Drive;
OF CHULA VISTA East ?alomar and Melrose Avenue; and North
Glover and Trousdale. The regulations have
provided good traffic control for the past
eight (8) months. At their meeting of
July 23, 1975 the Safety Commission concurred
with staff's recommendation that the above
Trial Traffic Regulations be made permanent.
RESOLUTION NO. 7931 - On August 29, 1975 the California Highway
ACCEPTING PARCELS OF Commission relinquished to the City of Chula
PROPERTY ALONG 1-805 Vista title and interest in and to six (6)
BET!~EEN TELEGRAPH CANYON parcels of property along 1-805 and Telegraph
ROAD AND FREEWAY ROUTE 54 Canyon Road and Freeway Route 54. Inspection
of these parcels was undertaken by the City
staff and they were found to be acceptable
to the City.
RESOLUTION NO. 7932 - Dale Building Company, developer of Hilltop
ELECTING TO PROCEED Vista Subdivision, has submitted a request
UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE for the vacation of the northerly 4 feet
STREET VACATION ACT OF 1941, of Telegraph Canyon Road adjacent to Lots
DECLARING THE INTENTION TO 93 and 94 of the Subdivision. The 4 feet
VACATE A PORTION OF TELEGRAPH of right of way which is to be vacated is
CANYON ROAD ADJACENT TO in essence excess right of way. Incorporat-
HILLTOP VISTA SUBDIVISION in9 the northerly 4 feet of Telegraph Canyon
AND FIXING AND TIME AND Road into the lo~s ~.¢ill enable tile developer
PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON to construct Lots 93 and 94 at an elevation
which will protect the property from flood
waters. The public hearing has been set for
November 18, 1975.
At the meeting of October 14, 1975 the
RESOLUTION NO. 7933 - City Council voted to deny the appeal of
DENYING THE APPEAL OF Florence J. Higgs from the Planning Commission
FLORENCE J. NIGGS FROM approval of a variance PCV-75-13 to Joseph
THE PLANNING COMMISSION Bush and Michael Bush for reduction in street
APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE frontage and lot depth for property at Toyon
PCV-75-13 TO JOSEPH BUSH Lane and "E" Street.
AND MICHAEL BUSN FOR
REDUCTION IN STREET (Councilman Scott voted "no" on this resolu-
FRONTAGE AND LOT DEPTH FOR tion.)
PROPERTY AT TOYON LANE AND
"E" STREET
(End of Consent Calendar)
RESOLUTION NO. 7934 - Bids were received on October 16, 1975 for
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARD- the installation of 17 sidewalk ramps for
ING CONTRACT FOR SIDEWALK the handilcapped in the City Hall area. Bids
RAMP INSTALLATION, CHULA were received from the following contractors:
VISTA CIVIC CENTER
Sapper Construction Company, $4,760.35
San Diego
T.B. Penick & Sons, Ibc., 5,513.48
San Diego
W.H. Ledbetter and Son, Inc., 5,574.00
San Diego
R.M~ Farrell, 6,505~80
Jamul
G. Spikes l~asonry, 7,025.00
San Diego
City Council fleeting 8 October 28, 1975
It was recommended that the contract be
awarded to the low bidder,Sapper Construc-
tion Company.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading
of the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Scott, Hobel,
Hamilton Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTION NO. 7935 - The Director of Building and Housing supports
AUTHORIZING CRANGE ORDERS an architect's recommendation for the following
13 AND 15 IN THE CONTRACT change orders to the library contract:
FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE
CHULA VISTA LIBRARY Change Order Description Price Chan§e
No. 13 Enlarge and fence in Add $5,870
utility pad
No, 15 Change interior walls Deduct(l,125)
from gypsum plaster to
to gypsum drywall
Total $4,745
The enlarged utility pad is required to
accommodate the air donditioner chillers.
The utility pad fence is required for protec-
tion from vandalism and will hide the utilities
from view. The wall change will improve the
interior design and result in a savings in
construction costs,
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of
the text Was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the follOWing vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Scott, Hobel,
Hamilton, Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTION APPROVING The Council directed staff to prepare a
AN AMENDMENT TO TIlE resolution approving an amendment to the
FY1975-76 AGREEMENT FY75-76 agreement with San Diego Transit
WITH SAN DIEGO TRANSIT Corporation and to accompany the resolution
CORPORATION with San Diego Transit's official policy
on resolving the conflict with San Diego
Economy Lines.
Report by City Attorney Mr. Lindberg made a brief summation of the
Eindberg letters presented to the Council, stating
that he had discussion with Hr. Patton,
Attorney for the San Diego Transit Corpora-
tion, and it was pointed out that the
situation has not changed from what it was
over a year ago in connection with San Diego
Transit buving out Mr. Allen's bus line.
The Transit Corporation says it cannot accept
Mr. Allen's proposal, The last offer ~as
approximately $375,000 and incorporated in the
offer was a requirement for employment
with the Transit Co~oration.
City Council Meeting 9 October 28, 1975
San Diego Transit has indicated their willing-
ness and interest in buying Mr. Allen's
company and have offered to employ an
independent appraiser; however, to date
no agreement has been reached. He commented
that San Diego Transit Corporation does not
have a "policy" in regard to this matter,
but their posture has not changed, nor has
Mr. Allen's position.
Motion to file resolution It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded
by Councilman Hyde that the resolution be
filed.
Discussion of motion Councilman Hyde stated that while he voted
last week in favor of the resolution approving
modification of the "L" Street bus line,
after further evaluation, he now feels that
basically it will not provide any benefits to
the City of Chula Vista and he does see some
loss of service to the City. He agreed that
the primary responsibility of the Council is
to provide for the citizens of the City.
Councilman Scott concurred that there would
be a loss of service to the people of Chula
Vista and felt there would not be any benefits.
Councilman Hobel further agreed with the
position of Councilmen Hyde and Scott. One
of his concerns is that in past years he has
seen erosion take place in small businesses,
and he expressed this concern in that perhaps
at some future date, the City might be
involved jointly with San Diego Transit on
some type of problem, therefore, on that
basis he supported the motion that was made.
Motion carried The motion to file the resolution carried
unanimously.
RECESS A recess was called at 8:20 p.m. and the
meeting reconvened at 8:35 p.m.
ORDINANCE NO. 1652 - This ordinance amends Section 2.40.010 of
AMENDING SECTION 2.40.010 the Chula Vista Mun~6ipal Code so that
OF THE CITY CODE RELATING criteria for membership on the Parking Place
TO QUALIFICATIONS FOR Commission would be either ownership of
APPOINTMENT TO THE PARKING property in the City or be an operator of
PLACE COMMISSION abusihess located within the Parking District.
SECOND READING AND ADOPTION The ordinance was placed on first reading
at the meeting of October 21, 1975.
Ordinance placed on second It was moved by Councilman Hobel that this
reading and adopted ordinance be placed on its second reading
and adopted and that reading of the text be
waived by unanimous consent.
The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hobel, Hamilton, Hyde,
Egdahl, Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
City Council Meeting 10 October 28, 1975
PROGRESS OF HUMAN CARE At the Council meeting of September 2, 1975
SERVICES FEASIBILITY STUDY staff was directed to provide information
on which the Council can decide whether or
not they wish to move into Human Care programs
as a City.
Report accepted It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that the report be accepted.
HOUSING ELEMENT COMMITTEE On October 14, 1975 the City Manager submitted
the Director of Planning~s comments regarding
the Housing Committee, The Council, at their
October 21 meeting, requested that th~s
matter be placed on the agenda of October 28
for creation of the committee. In addition
to fulfilling the duties as set out in the
Housing Element, it was requested that this
committee also serve as a screening committee
for applications for loans under the Rehabilita-
tion Block Grant program.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Egdahl to accept
and call for executive the report and called for an executive session
session later in the meeting for personnel matters.
The motion was amended to include pending
litigation, seconded by Councilman Hyde and
carried unanimously.
STATE BOND ACT FUNDS Mr. Cole reported that the City has received
the State Bond Act funds for the development
of Rohr Park for an amount over $131,400
and it is proposed to complete the park so
it can be dedicated in 1976, possibly as one
of the Bicentennial projects.
REPORT ON SENATOR COLLIER'S Mr. Cole explained that he attended Senator
COMMITTEE r~EETING REGARDING Collier's Committee meeting and that he
TRANSPORTATION reported the concerns of the Council to the
Committee on the completion of I-5 between
"E" and 24th Streets, Route 54 between 1-805
and I-5 and the need for landscaping, He
indicated that the City was in favor of
widening the freeway, but certainly expected
the freeway to subsequently be landscaped.
Mr. Cole expressed his feeling that the
Senator was finding that inflation and lack
of gas tax funds is stopping and affecting
many areas of the State, which he was sure
the Senator would pass on to the Legislature.
The City Manager also indicated that the
Council supported SB 100 which is to increase
the gas tax.
STATUS REPORT ON COM- The Council recently approved a staff report
PREHENSIVE TRANSPORTA- which recommended a Comprehensive Transporta-
TION NEEDS STUDY - tion Needs Study to evaluate the Chula Vista
Director of Public Works/ Bus Lines, A request for proposals to conduct
City Engineer this study was mailed to 13 transporation
consultants on October 15, 1975, with the
request that proposals be submitted prior to
~ovember 12, 1975. Scheduled plans are to
City Council Meeting ll October 28, 1975
select the best three (3) proposals and to
invite the firms who submitted these three
proposals for an oral interview during the
week of November 24, 1975, The succesful
proposal will be forwarded to Council for
approval and contract award on December 9,
1975~ The request for proposals calls,for
the study to be completed by March 1, !976.
Report accepted It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded by
Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that the report be accepted.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Environmental Impact It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded by
Statement for Otay Mesa Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
Prison Facility that the Council make a request directed
to the proper State Department to have an
Environmental Impact Statement prepared in
regard to the possible prison facility in
Otay Mesa so that whatever decision }s made
will be made on valid information. The
Mayor recommended that the State make the
report available to the Cities of National
City, chula Vistas Imperial Beach and San Diego
for evaluation and input.
Council Meeting Cancelled After discussion by Council and staff, Mayor
for November ll~ 1975 Hamilton announced that the Council Meeting
regularly scheduled for November ll, 1975
would not be held as it is a State holiday.
COUNCIL COI~qENTS
CPO Meeting Councilman Hobel reported that he testified
on behalf of the Comprehensive Planning
Organization (CPO) at the Transportation
hearing and noted the absence of Senator
Mills and Assemblyman Deddeh who he felt
were key people in the hearing board.
Revenue Sharing Councilman Hyde stated he had a copy of the
National League of Cities llashington Report
dated October 22 requesting City Councils
to bring to the attention of their Congres-
sional representative the necessity, or
desirability of having general revenue
sha~ing continued. He felt it would be wise
for the Council to draft a letter to Congress-
man Van Deerlin pointing out strong support
for revenue sha~ng and citing its positive
effects.
Motion to have letter It was moved by Councilman Ilyde that staff
prepared be requested to prepare a strong letter to
Congressman Van Deerlin in support of general
revenue sharing this year,
Councilman Scott seconded the motion with
the request that the letter be prepared for
the Mayor's signature, with a copy to
Congressman Bob ~Jilson.
City Council Meeting 12 October 287 1975
Motion carried The motion carried unanimously.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Verified claim for damages - Mr. Reginold Lydia and Ms. Regina Morris
Reginold A, Lydia and Regina Morris, presented a claim for personal injuries and
835 West Vernon Avenue~ @ro~erty damage resulting from an automobile
Los Angeles acc!dentoccurringon July 26, 1975 on
Banner Avenue at the intersection with
Carver Street~ A short investigation into
the matter deternlined that the area
involved is located within the County of
San Diego and is not a part of the incor-
porated City of Chula Vista,
Claim denied It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that the claim be denied.
Request from Chula Vista Request was received from the Chula Vista
Junior Woman's Club Junior Woman's Club to hold its Third Annual
Christmas Tree Recycling Program with the
City providing a mulcher and crew Monday,
December 29, 1975 to shred the Christmas
trees and the mulch given to the City for
use as fertilizer for the schools.
Motion.toappro~ It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
and ~efer~to st~ff by Councilman Egd~hl that the request be
approved and referred to staff.
Request from City employees Request has been received from the City
of Civic Center employees of Civic Center to ho~d their
annual Christmas Party at Rohr Park, On
October 16, the Parks and Recreation
Commission voted unanimously recommending
approval of the request.
Permission granted It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
that permission be granted.
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT The Council recessed to the Redevelopment
AGENCY Agency meeting at 8:50 p.m. and the meeting
reconvened at 8:52 p.m.
Executive Session The Council recessed to Executive Session
at 8:52 p.m. and the meeting reconvened
at 9:20 p.m.
Reappointments to It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
Youth Commission by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that the following Youth Commission members
be reappointed to the Commission:
Miss Debbie Avery
Mr. David Poret
Miss Lisa Lassman
City Council Meeting 13 October 28, 1975
Appointment to It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
Planning Commission by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that ?lr, Roy Johnson of 351 Palomar Drive,
Chula Vista, be appointed as a member of
the Planning CommisSion.
Appointments to It was moved by Councilman Hyde that staff
Housing Element Committee recommendation for appointment to the
Housing Element Committee be approved as
follows:
Marion Hunt (local realtor)
Bob Barrick (local banker)
Barbara Hartley (local savings and loan)
Sandy Pasqua (Human Relations Commission)
Dale Horton (local builder)
Motion was seconded by Councilman Scott
and carried unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hamilton adjourned the meeting at
9;22 p.m~ to the meeting scheduled for
Tuesday, NoVember 4, 1975 at 7:00 p.m.
Deputy c!ty Clerk