HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1974/09/17
REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday September 17, 1974
A regularly scheduled meeting of the Redeve~opment Agency of the City of Chula
Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 12:36 a.m. in the
Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the following
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Hamilton, Members Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Members absent: None
Staff present: Executive Director Thomson, Assistant City Manager Bourcier,
City Attorney Lindberg, Community Development Coordinator
Henthorn,Administrative Analyst Smith, Director of Planning
Peterson, Acting Director of Public Works Robens
APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member
Egdahl and unanimously carried that the minutes of
the meeting of August 20, 1974 be approved, copies
having been sent to each Member.
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST In a written report to the Agency, Community
FOR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Development Coordinator Henthorn reviewed the
PARTICIPATION IN IMPROVE- matter of the applicant's (Anthony's Fish Grotto)
MENTS OF ANTHONY'S FISH request for City participation in public improve-
GROTTO ments adjacent to the restaurant development.
Mr. Henthorn consulted the Agency Attorney Clifton
Reed, and it was Mr. Reed's opinion that the Agency
is not prohibited from participating in the
development but the propriety of the participation
should be decided based on certain factors.
The cost for participation in the public right-of-way
landscaping would be $1,500.00 (50% of the total).
The cost for street-related improvements would be
$1,763.88.
It was the recommendation that the Agency limit its
participation to street-related improvements along the
E Street frontage at a cost of $1,763.88. In addition,
the developer to be required to enter into a
participation agreement with the Redevelopment Agency.
Member's comments Member Hyde commented on the two options declaring
that the City expects everyone to put in street
improvements. In this particular case, the City
is asking for higher standards of landscaping require-
ments and for this reason he was in favor of this
option.
Page 28
City Attorney's opinion Mr. Lindberg stated that either option would be
legal. Staff's position is that the City has
already put up the money for the sewer connection
and that this project did indicate its preference
for locating here undertaking the normal improve-
ments without any stimulus of a Redevelopment
Agency.
Motion to share in It was moved by Member Hyde, seconded by Chairman
landscaping costs Hamilton that approval be given to the $1500
share of the landscaping project proposal.
Motion carried The motion carried by the fOllowing vote:
AYES: Members Hyde, Hamilton, Egdahl, Hobel
Noes: Member Scott
Absent: None
REBORT ON REQUEST FOR Executive Director Thomson reported that Requests
PROPOSAL - DOWNTOWN for Proposals were mailed out to thirty consulting
MARKET STUDY firms on Friday, September 13, 1974. The
schedule for this program is as follows:
Deadline for notification of
intention to bid September 20, 1974
Bid deadline October 15, 1974
Completion of selection and
contract negotiation process November 1, 1974
Study complete March 1975
Report accepted It was moved by Member Hobel, seconded by Member
Scott and unanimously carried that the report
be accepted.
Motion on landscaping Mr. Henthorn asked if the previous motion included
participation agreement the developer entering into an agreement with the
Redevelopment Agency as required by the Bayfront Plan.
It was moved by Member Egdahl, seconded by Member
Hyde and unanimously carried that this agreement
be made.
ADJOURN1>1ENT Chairman Hamilton adjourned the meeting at 12:40 a.m.
to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, September 24,
1974. /J
(. /'. - (I
,:> ;:eltdu.e..~ JJl ~¿J.ð;:;./
. /. Secret y
1/'/
Page 29