Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1974/08/20 REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday August 20, 1974 A regularly scheduled meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 7:43 p.m. in the Council Chamber, Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the following Members present: Chairman Hamilton, Members Scott, Hobel, Hyde Members absent: Member Egdahl Staff present: Executive Director Thomson, Assistant City Attorney Beam, Assistant City Manager Bourcier, Community Development Coordinator Henthorn, Administrative Analyst Smith, Director of Public Works Cole, Director of Planning Peterson APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by Member Hyde and unanimously carried that the minutes of the meeting of August 13, 1974 be approved, copies having been sent to each Member. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST At the request of the developer, Harding FOR AGENCY PARTICIPATION Campbell, this item was ~ontinued from IN PROVISION OF IMPROVEMENTS the meeting of August 13, 1974. IN CONJUNCTION WITH DEVELOPMENT OF ANTHONY'S RESTAURANT At the meeting of August 6, 1974, the Council asked for more information con~ cerning the relationship between the land~ scape requirements for this project and that recommended by the Sedway/Cooke-based Bayfront Redevelopment Plan. Community Development Coordinator Henthorn submitted a written report explaining that this particular development (Anthony's Fish Grotto) was approved by the Council on January 8, 1974 and a building permit issued April 24, 1974. The proj ect was approved subject to specific conditions prior to the adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council/Redevelopment Agency. Mr, Henthorn referred to the reports sub~ mitted by the Director of Public Works and the Director of Planning regarding the landscaping requirements. The appli~ cant, Mr. Campbell, has requested Agency participation in the im~rovements. Page 25 ----->- .--~-.--..~-.-.--- --...-.^-- On November 13, 1973, the City Council accepted the staff's report voting unanimously not to participate financially in the landscaping and directed the City Manager to require that Anthony's land~ scape architect prepare the landscape plans for the right-of-way area contem- plated to be transferred to the City from the State; further, that the maintenance of landscaped areas on the south side of "E" Street should be the responsibility of the abutting property owner. Executive Director Thomson recommended disapproval of the applicant's request. Attorney's Comments Assistant City Attorney Beam stated that he discussed this matter with Attorney Reed, Attorney for the Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Reed said there was no obligation on the part of the Agency to provide for the improvements, as requested. Agency discussion Agency discussion ensued in which the members stated their opinions as to participation in the requested landscaping improvements. Under discussion, Member Hyde felt the Agency should approve the request since this was the first development in the bayfront area and was of significant importance since it was the entrance to the Bayfront area. Motion to approve request It was moved by Member Hyde that the Agency participate in the landscaping of this pro~ ject not to exceed $1500.00. Discussion of motion Attorney Beam stated that at this time, he could not advise the Agency as to whether or not they should participate and what the dollar amount should be. He suggested that the Agency direct the staff to prepare a report on the level of participation in accordance with the recommendation of Attorney Reed. Motion for Executive Director's It was moved by Member Hyde and seconded by report Member Hobel that the Executive Director be directed to advise the Agency as to the propriety of participating in the landscaping costs for this project, and if so recommended, he come back with a dollar figure of support to be considered. Discussion of motion Member Scott spoke against the motion noting that this matter had already been resolved by Page 26 -. _._-"~_..,--~'"----,- Agency meeting 8/20/74 the developer and the City and now it is back before the Agency for a change. He felt this should be done only in extreme extenuating circumstances. Member Scott discussed the precedent which he felt would be established in approving this request. Chairman Hamilton remarked that at the time the project was proposed, there was no Redevelop- ment Agency; therefore, there was no chance for the Agency to discuss the matter. Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Members Hyde, Hobel, Hamilton Noes: Member Scott Absent: Member Egdahl EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Executive Director Thomson reported on the meeting held with Mr. and Mrs.Gruen on Monday, August 19 regarding the Downtown Business area. Mr. Gruen suggested that the Agency take a first phase approach, rather than expending a large sum of money, for a complete study of the area. The study would deal with existing trends, taking into account the impact of a new regional shopping center. It would take approximately four to five months to complete at a cost of $10,000 to $12,000. Member Scott commented that he was happy with the calibre and report of Gruen and Gruen but suggested local firms be contacted first to see if they are interested in this project. Motion for Executive Director's It was moved by Member Hyde, seconded by recommendation Member Scott that the Executive Director be directed to prepare specifications for a contract for such a study, and that he proceed to contact potential research consultants and then report his recommendations to the Agency. Executive Director Thomson suggested the same City staff meet with the local firms as met with Mr. and Mrs Gruen: Director of Planning, Director of Public Works, Redevelopment Coordin- ator and a member of the City Manager's staff, Motion carried The Council concurred and the motion carried unanimously. ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hamilton adjourned the meeting at 8:08 p.m. ~~¿h ~et ry / page 27 -_.~._,--_.- ---'---~'- -- --,.._-_.~-_._--_._.,~--_..._----