HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1974/08/06
REGULAR MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday August 6, 1974
A regularly scheduled meeting of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula
Vista was held on the above date beginning at 11:40 p.m. in the Council Chamber,
Civic Center, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the following
Members present: Chairman Hamilton, Members Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Members absent: None
Staff present: Executive Director Thomson, City Attorney Lindberg,
Community Development Coordinator Henthorn, Administrative
Analyst Smith, Director of Public Works Cole, Director of
Planning Peterson
APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Member Egdahl, seconded by
Member Scott and unanimously carried that the
minutes of the meeting of July 23, 1974 be ap-
proved, copies having been sent to each Member.
REPORT ON POSSIBLE USE OF In a report to the Agency, Executive Director
STATE REDEVELOPMENT ACT Thomson stated that he contacted Mr. Clifton
PROVISIONS IN RICE E. Reed, attorney providing specialized legal
CANYON AREA assistance in the Agency's redevelopment ef-
forts, regarding the possibility of applying
the provisions of the Community Redevelopment
Law to the Rice Canyon area.
Based upon the comments received from Mr. Reed,
staff members of other agencies and the City's
own research, Mr. Thomson indicated that the
utilization of the provisions of the Community
Redevelopment Law in this area was not advis-
able. He added that this does not preclude
the potential for utilizing applicable Federal
programs for this purpose, and if the block
grant format replaces the existing categorical
grant format there would be a good possibility
that funds will be made available for public
improvements of the type needed in the Rice
Canyon area.
Report accepted It was moved by Member Scott, seconded by
Member Hyde and unanimously carried that the
report be accepted.
Page 19
.._--_._~_.._._--,._-._-~..__._.._---_..._._--"
REQUEST FOR AGENCY PAR- Mr. Harding Campbell, developer of Anthony's
TICIPATION IN PUBLIC Fish Grotto, requested that the Redevelopment
IMPROVEMENTS - ANTHONY'S Agency participate in public improvements rela-
FISH GROTTO tive to his development.
Director of Public Works Director of Public Works Cole, by a memo to the
Executive Director, stated that those facilities
that directly serve the development should be
paid for by the developer. On the "E" Street
frontage, the State Division of Highways has
eliminated access for approximately half of
its frontage and the City has eliminated access
on the balance of the frontage. There is a
No Parking restriction on this frontage and
street improvements include the installation
of curb, gutter and sidewalk for this entire
frontage and 70 feet of curb and 50 feet of
sidewalk beyond the frontage towards the freeway.
Mr. Cole added that the sidewalk would serve
only those pedestrians who are entering and
leaving the Bayfront development area from east
of the freeway. It would therefore be reason-
able for the Agency to participate in the in-
stallation of the sidewalk on the "E" Street
frontage amounting to approximately $700 and
the offsite curb and sidewalk amounting to an
additional $400.
When a special use permit was granted for this
project, it was recommended that the City par-
ticipate in the landscaping in the amount of
$1,200. This was rejected. Mr. Cole commented
that it may now be reasonable for the Agency
to participate in this project. The total
amount of City participation, therefore, would
be $2,500.
Director of Planning Director of Planning Peterson disagreed with
this approach stating that any additional
participation by the City or Agency should be
based on circumstances peculiar to this prop-
erty in order to avoid setting a precedent
which may have adverse effects on accrued
revenues.
Executive Director's Mr. Thomson indicated that his recommendation
recommendation would be to oppose the request.
Motion to accept It was moved by Member Hyde and seconded by
staff's recommendation Member Scott that the Executive Director's
recommendation be accepted - the City not
participate in the public improvements.
Discussion Chairman Hamilton commented that in the rede-
velopment there will be certain requirements
Page 20
placed upon the property owners much less than
that required by the Sedway/Cooke report - which
is being required of this property owner. The
Chairman added that he does not believe it is
incumbent upon those people that because of
being at the entrance of the Bayfront (even
though the economic advantage might be there)
to have to abide by all the landscaping the
City wants to have at this location. Chairman
Hamilton further added that where extraordinary
landscaping requirements are required, the Re-
development Agency should assist.
Planning Director Peterson stated he would
check the Sedway/Cooke plan as to the land-
scaping requirement for this site. He felt
that a judgment was made whereby adherence to
the City's Landscape Manual satisfied the
Sedway/Cooke report.
Substitute motion It was moved by Member Hobel and seconded by
Member Hyde that this matter be held over
until the next regular meeting of the Redevel-
opment Agency.
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Members Hobel, Hamilton, Hyde,
Egdahl
Noes: Member Scott
Absent: None
SCHOOL BOARD MEETING Executive Director Thomson reported that he
attended a meeting of the Sweetwater Union
High School District Board on Monday, August 5,
1974 and gave the Board members a status re-
port on the Bayfront project. Their response
to the report was positive.
PORT DISTRICT In answer to Member Hyde's question, Chairman
MEETING Hamilton reported that he, Member Scott and
the Executive Director met with Mr. Don Nay
and Commissioner Bob Campbell.
At their meeting today, the Port District was
to consider improvements to the "J" Street
marina, such as picnic tables, leveling the
cliff, landscaping and planting grass. They
still favor dredging the "J" Street marina so
that it would be deeper for better use. The
Page 21
commissioners realize the difficulties that
will be encountered in getting this project
done and have stated their willingness to use
Port District money, rather than Federal money
to complete the project.
As to the Sedway/Cooke Plan, a great deal of
discussion was held and it is hoped that in
the near future a mutual agreement can be
reached on the one problem area of disagree-
ment.
Chairman Hamilton added that these meetings
will continue whereby two members of the Coun-
cil and a member of the staff will meet with
the Port Commissioners and their staff.
ADJOURNMENT Chairman Hamilton adjourned the meeting at
11:55 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for
August 13, 1974.
~··l
" Ø1~
\. /" - I
-;t:Z7/WJU.e., / / ~ hAt'
,/" - Secretary
(/
Page 22
____n_______