HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1976/01/06 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTa, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday January 6, 1976
A regular meeting of the City Council of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above
date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, with
the following
Councilmen present: Mayor Hamilton, Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Director of Public Works
Robens, Director of Planning Peterson, Director of Parks and Rec-
reation Hall, Community Development Director Desrochers, Assistant
City Attorney Beam
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Pro Tempore Scott followed by
a moment of silent prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Councilman Hobel, seconded by
Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried by
those present that the minutes of the meetings
of December 17 and 23, 1975 be approved, copies
having been sent to each Councilman.
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
2a. Proclamation - Honoring the Mayor Pro Tempore Scott read the Proclamation
State of Alabama saluting the State of Alabama in this Bicentennial
Year. The Vice Chairman of the Bicentennial
Program, Mr. Mike Bailey, accepted the Proclamation.
The people in the audimnce from the State of
Alabama rose and introduced themselves, after
which they were invited to the Council Conference
for refreshments.
(Mayor Hamilton came in at this time.)
2b. Presentation of Special Mr. Michael Ruiz of the American Automobile
Citation - Casualty Association presented the City with a plaque on
Record winning a Special Citation for Casualty Record
among all cities with 50,000 to 100,000 pop-
ulation reporting in the 1975 AAA Pedestrian
Safety Inventory Program.
Letter of thanks to be It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
sent to school district Councilman Scott and unanimously carried that
a letter be addressed to the Superintendent
of the Elementary School District noting the
fact that the City has received this award for
pedestrian safety and thanking the school
district for its contribution for this record
as a result of their traffic safety patrol
that they have to assist the City.
City Council Meeting -2- January 6, 1976
2c. Oaths of Office - City Clerk Fulasz administered the Oath of
Youth Commissioners Office to the following newly-appointed
members of the Youth Commission:
Victoria Q. Corona
Karen Elaine Maruyama
Maria A. Trejo
Barbara Jill Gilmour
Steven Brooke Grogh
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ruth Chapman Mrs. Chapman hopes the Council will continue
8 Sierra Way with pedestrian traffic safety especially at
Chula Vista the "H" Street c~ossing. Mrs. Chapman thanked
the Council for the fine calendars sent to
everyone in the City.
J. R. Shattuck Mr. Shattuck discussed the Council's action
6150 Mission Gorge Road regarding a moratorium on construction east of
Suite 204 1-805 until such time as the extension of
San Diego, CA 92120 east "H" Street is constructed to take care of
traffic generated by the building.
Mr. Shattuck stated he has received approval of
a tentative map of South Bay Villas subdivision
and has been working to bring the final map
before the Council. He noted the problems en-
countered with this subdivision and asked the
Council if there was any likelihood that he
would be denied the final map or building
permits.
Councilman Scott explained his motion for a
staff study regarding a study for moratorium,
adding that it is the Council's intent to solve
a problem, not to create one and Mr. Shattuck
will be given every consideration.
Tom Showalter Mr. Showalter said his firm is in the process
2505 Congress of purchasing Southwestern College Estates,
Pacific Scene, Inc. Units 8 and 9. They share the same concern as
Mr. Shattuck and wanted the same assurance that
these units will fall under the grandfather
clause to grant building permits on these
projects.
Richard Kelton In answer to Mr. Kelton's query, Councilman
Bollenbacher & Kelton Scott explained the need for the County's
5109 Waring Road cooperation in establishing a moratorium in
San Diego that area east of 1-805.
Joseph Raso Mr. Raso stated he is starting a petition for
157 Murray Street referendum to (1) get the right of sanitary
Chula Vista trash service to all persons owning buildings in
Chula Vista at least three years; (2) the trash
service to be rendered at a reasonable fee;
(3) the service shall be rendered on a regular
basis at least 52 times a year; (4) the City
to be responisbte for construction of a year
round road to the outermost property line of
the qualifying buildings; (5) all businesses
generating 500 cubic feet of refuse weekly to
be provided with a second year round access
away from that business' main entrance.
City Council Meeting -3- January 6, 1976
City Attorney Lindberg cormnented that what
Mr. Raso is seeking should not be done through
petitioning for a special election through the
initiative process.
Mayor Hamilton indicated that Mr. Raso should
try to get the property owners interested in
getting a 1911 Act for improvement of the alley.
City Manager Cole explained that the City
truck ~nt out to the restaurant last week to
help Mr. Raso with his trash; however, he was
able to move it himself. Another option the
City has is to provide a spot in the parking
lot for the dumpster and have a footbridge
across the drainage channel to the back of
the restaurant.
Fred Allen Mr. Allen stated he is owner of the San Diego
10106 Del Rio Economy Bus firm that runs through the City of
Spring Valley Chula Vista. Mr. Allen noted all the problems
he is having with trying to get San Diego
Transit Corporation to buy his bus line and asked
that the Council set a date for a meeting with
all parties concerned so he can present all
his facts.
Mayor Hamilton informed Mr. Allen that the
Council cannot help him in his transactions with
San Diego Transit and advised him to get an
attorney for legal counsel.
4. PUBLIC HEARING - On December 9, 1975, the Council, by Resolution
TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE Number 7968, directed the City Attorney to give
MAINTENANCE OF CERTAIN notice to the following community households
HOUSEHOLDS IN THE R-1 to show cause why the maintenance of said house-
ZONE ARE IN VIOLATION OF holds should not be declared a public nuisance
CHULA VISTA CITY CODE AND and abated by appropriate legal action.
CONSTITUTE A PUBLIC
NUISANCE 206 Fifth Avenue
81 Mitscher Street
174 Landis Avenue
65 Mitscher Street
City Attorney discussed the previous hearing
(December 9, 1975) at which time the Council
declared three households to be public nuisances
based on the number of persons unrelated by
blood or marriage living in one of these house-
holds in excess of that number allowed pursuant
to the family definition.
Stipulation noted City Attorney Lindberg signed a stipulation
which has been concurred by William Cannon,
attorney for the extended households, which
provides that the persons testifying tonight
do have personal knowledge of the fact and
criminal immunity is granted to those persons,
and other technical provisions regarding ex-
hibits and evidence.
City Council Meeting -4- January 6, 1976
William Cannon Mr. Cannon asked the Council to take a look
Stickney Ortlieb Moasts & at the definition of a family in the Municipal
Burn Code. He noted that at the last hearing, the
303 "A" Street question of the term "servant" was raised. He
San Diego remarked that all of tho witnesses testified
that they were "servants" of one another; however,
the resolution passed by the Council indicated
there wore no servants in the household. Mr.
Cannon read the various definitions of a "servant"
as found in Webster's dictionary, Black's Law,
and the Bible.
Mr. Cannon then declared that nowhere in the
Municipal Code is there a provision for a guest
in someone's house. He alleged that the Council
violates the Code section by having any two
unrelated people as guests in their homes.
Mr. Cannon disnussod whether a family oxista as
a sole entity - one unit. Under the Code section,
three separate families can be living together.
In its consideration, Mr. Cannon asked the Council
not to be swayed by public sentiment and vicious
rumors but to use their own reason, logic and
a little compassion.
Jerry Jamison In answer to both Attorney Beam's and Attorney
206 Fifth Avenue Cannon's questions, Mr. Jamison, after being
Chula Vista sworn in by tho City Clark, testified that
there are sevon porsons residing at this
address, none of which are related by marriage,
blood or adoption. They are all "servants" of
oach other - none hired as domestic servants in
the employer-employee sense. .He considers
them to be a "family" based on their common goals,
coF~itment to one another, sharing their lives
and possessions and the purpose and feelings of
the group.
In answer to the Council's questions, Mr.
Jamison said he is employed at the Church; the
maximum people living at this address at one
time was nine; all of the people are over 18
years of age.
Leonard Frey Mr. Frey was sworn in by the City Clerk. In
81 Mitscher Street answer to questions by both attorneys, Mr. Frey
Chula Vista testified that there are nine persons residing
at this address at this time: three persons are
related to him (wife and two children), mother
with two children, and the other two persons
are not related to anyone else in the house-
hold by blood, marriage, or adoption. They do
"serve" one another including work throughout
the house; the mother of the two children
serves in a domestic capacity in the house --
she is not paid but gets support of all her
needs and her children. They do not have an
employer/employee relationship but the needs of
all the persons are provided. They work as a
family unit, supporting and helping each other.
He is closer to the persons residing in the
household than he is to his mother, brothers
and sisters. They are committed to each other
and will keep this relationship as long as
these persons want it.
City Council Meeting -5- January 6, 1976
In answer to Council's questions, Mr. Frey
said he has bean head of the household for
16 months; 4 children under the age of 18;
they have had people who come in as guests --
they have one temporary guest now; he works
for Pacific Telephone Company; 13 people
lived there 6 months ago.
Ron Alsop Mr. Alsop, after being sworn in by the City
174 Landis Avenue Clerk, testified to the attorney's questions
Chula Vista as follows: there are 16 members living at
this address (14 resided there 6 months ago)
consisting of three families: his family
(wife and 2 children); family of two people
(mother and son); another family of four
(wife, husband and 2 children); the remaining
Six people are not related by blood, marriage
or adoption. Under the definition of a servant
that has already been discussed, they are all
"servants." They received board and room
which might be considered some type of re-
~umeration. He considers the household to be
of a permanent nature; he has owned the home
for over 5 years and has been head of the house for
2 1/2 years; the majority of the people have
been living there since its concept.
In answer to the Council's questions, Mr. Alsop
considered the size of his family as a "good
number right now"; 2 or 3 people have left the
household since a year ago; 2 have come in
since the last six months; a "member" of the
family is considered a member of the family
such as his own wife and daughter.
Councilman Hobel questioned Mr. Alsop as to
the number of antomobiles in the family.
Attorney Cannon objected to the question;
Mayor Hamilton sustained the objection.
Mr. Alsop continued answering the Council's
questions stating he is employed; everyone
that has left the household is still considered
part of the family; everyone within the Church
households im considered a part of the family;
at the present time, he is employed full-time
at the Church.
Lawrence J. Clark Mr. Clark was sworn in by the City Clerk. In
65 Mitscher Street answer to the questions of the attorneys, Mr.
Chula Vista Clark testified that there are 14 people living
at this address: his wife and 2 children;
mother and two children; husband and wife; the
· other 5 are not related by marriage, blood or
adoption. They are "servants" of each other
receiving many spiritual renumerations and
$2.50 a week; the household has increased -
a child was born 3 weeks ago.
Mr. Clark stated they are a group of people
committed to each other, sharing their dining
facilities, spiritual goals in common and
they care for each other. The family is
permanent in its intent and purpose.
City Council Meeting -6- January 6, 1976
In answer to Council's questions, Mr. Clark
stated there are 4 people under the age of 18
years of age; he is employed. The question
of whether Mr. Clark filed an income tax
return was overruled by the Mayor as were the
questions pertaining to the $2.50 received by
the persons in the household.
Argument by Attorney Beam Assistant City Attorney Beam gave his definition
of a "servant" as found in the Random House
Dictionary - 1967. He asked the Council to
follow the court's direction in coming to a
definition of a word, statute or ordinance: to
"that which men of ordinary intelligence would
normally ascribe to that word."
Recommendation to declare Attorney Beam noted the testimonies given
households public nuisances tonight noting the number of persons in each
household and asked that the Council direct the
City Attorney's office to bring back a resolution
declaring the households at 206 Fifth Avenue,
81 Mitscher Street, 174 Landis Avenue and 65
Mitscher Street to be in violation of the City's
Zoning Ordinance and declaring them to be a
public nuisance.
Argument by Attorney Cannon Attorney Cannon stated that the City Code does
not define what a "servant" is. The dictionary
definitions fit the people who have testified
tonight. Each of these people receive room
and board for the services they are rendering
and each of them has a task to render in that
household. These people have a spiritual com-
mitment amongst themselves and this should be
recognized by the Council. There is no re-
striction in the City Code as to how many
automobiles a person can have. Mr. Cannon
further stated that the law, as the Council is
applying it is discriminatory - it is being
applied in a discriminatory fashion as to pre-
clude these people from living the lifestyle
which they believe enriches the City and their
own lives.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or
against, Mayor Hamilton declared the hearing
closed.
RECESS A recess was called at 8:50 p.m. and the
meeting reconvened at 9:04 p.m.
Motion to declare households It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
public nuisances Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried that
the four extended households at the addresses of
206 Fifth Avenue, 81 Mitscher Street, 174
Landis Aveque, and 65 Mitscher Street are in
fact a violation of the City's Zoning Ordinance
and therefore are considered to be public
nuisances. Appropriate resolutions are to be
prepared by the City Attorney declaring them to
be public nuisances.
City Council Meeting -7- January 6, 1976
5. PUBLIC HEARING - Community Development Director Desrochers
TO CONSIDER CITIZEN explained that the Department of Housing and
PARTICIPATION IN Urban Development (HUD) requires that at least
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT two public hearings be h~ld prior to the for-
BLOCK GRANT mulation of the City's request. The first
public hearing was held on November 25, 1975
and concluded on December 9, 1975.
Mr. Desrochers requested that the Council hold
a workshop on January 8, 1976 immediately
following the Redevelopment Agency meeting
regarding the contents of the Block Grant
Application.
Public hearing opened This being the time and place as advertised,
Mayor Hamilton opened the public hearing.
Will B. Johnstone, Jr. Mr. Johnstone said he is the Vice President of
647 Myra Avenue the Chula Vista Taxpayers Association. The
Chula Vista Association opposes the use of these funds for
the following reasons: (i) the projects under
consideration are over and above projects
already budgeted; (2) most of these will require
further capital expenditures and operating
and maintenance expenses; (3) some of these
projects will remove property from the tax rolls
of the City. If the City takes tha position
that the funds must be used, the Taxpayers
Association request that they be used to acquire
substandard property in planned redevelopment
Anthony Ciati Mr. Ciati said he was speaking for the
1338 Santa Cruz Court Matropolitan Area Advisory Committee and asked
Chula Vista the Council for funds for a multi-s~rvice
center located next to 0ray School at Albany and
Main Street. The County will pay for a 7,000
square foot building but they need a 15,000
square foot huilding. They need approximately
$275,000 to $300,000. The County is providing
approximately $250,000 to $275,000 for a
7,000 square foot facility -- they are asking
Chula Vista for matching funds to double this
capacity.
Councilman Hobel commented that this is an
initial outlay and questioned what would happen
in the long-range fdnding of this facility.
Margaret Helton Mrs. Helton discussed the Senior Services Center.
162 Mankato Street She requested space for a multi-purpose center
Chula Vista which would contain space for nutrition programs.
This building could be built on City owned
property on Del Mar or on the Center Street
side of the Norman Park Center. Mrs. Helton
spoke in support of the multi-service Center to
be built adjacent to Otay School. She has a
rough plan of the space needed for this center
and will give it to the staff to analyze costs.
City Council Meeting -8- January 6, 1976
Sid Morris Mr. Morris objected to spending these funds
862 Cedar Street when the City is not sure "what they're getting
Chula Vista into." He felt the Council and the citizens
should try to save money in view of the fact
that everything is going up.
Robert Alcaraz Mr. Alcaraz stated he is the President of the
232 Harbison Board of Starlight Center. He asked for Block
National City Grant Funds in the amount of $40,000 for (1)
an architect's assistance in projecting a
Master Plan for the next ten-year period; (2)
construction of a multi-purpose building at
their present site (1280 Nolan Avenue).
Newt Chaney Mr. Chaney said he talked to the staff about
292 Seavale the Block Grant Funds and they helped him under-
Chula Vista stand what it was all about. He remarked that
he is echoing Mr. Morris' comments and that the
money, if used, should be used for something
that would benefit the maximum number of people
in the City such as a Community Center.
Rosette Morris Mrs. Morris asked if the money had to be used -
862 Cedar Street could the City refuse it.
Chula Vista
Mayor Hamilton explained that if the City
refused the money it would just go to another
community. Since Chula Vista paid the taxes,
they should get some of these benefits.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for
or against, the hearing was declared closed.
Workshop scheduled It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried that
a Council workshop be scheduled at the time
suggested by the Community Development Director -
immediately following the Redevelopment Agency
Meeting of January 8, in the Council Conference
Room.
City Manager Cole stated it should be an
adjourned Council meeting.
Motion changed to "Adjourned Councilman Hyde amended his motion to reflect
Regular Meeting" this change.
6a. PUBLIC HEARING - Director of Planning Peterson stated that the
CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE 1.62 acres was purchased by the applicant from
OF ZONE FOR 1.62 ACRES Cal Trans as excess right-of-way. The applicant
AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT wants to subdivide the property into three
OF 1-805 AND EAST "J" residential lots.
STREET FROM UNZONED TO
R-1-H The Planning Commission reconnnended that the
Council approve the rezoning of the property
from unzoned to R-1-H (Hillside Modifying
District) in accordance with the findings set
forth in their Resolution PCZ-75-J and to
certify EIR-75-4.
Council discussion Discussion followed regarding the City re-
linquishing its right-of-way and getting an
open space easement.
City Council Meeting -9- January 6, 1976
Public hearing opened This being the time and place as advertised,
Mayor Hamilton opened the public hearing.
George Cunradi Mr. Cunradi said he is the owner of the
property and intends to build three homes on
it. The large parcel will be his own home;
the homes will be at least 1600 square feet;
because of the wind, he will get less noise
from the freeway; the homes will be insulated
in the best possible manner.
Public closed There being no further comments, either for or
hearing
against, Mayor Hamilton declared the hearing
closed.
Noise level In answer to Councilman Hyde's query, Planning
Dimector Peterson explained that the State
Law requires insulation of residential dwellings
to insure a 45 decibel maximum inside. It is
the staff's intent to find out what the ambient
level is outside, what type of building
construction would be required to meet these
requirements, and this would be required at the
time of building permit.
City Attorney's opinion Mr. Lindberg stated that the Council can impose
the conditions recon~nended by the Planning
Commission and the property owner would have
to conform to the State Law standards regarding
the noise level. This is a special case because
of its situation.
Motion regarding It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
insulation construction Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried that
the ordinance be amended to (1) include a
requirement for sound-proofing to achieve an
interior noise level not to exceed 45 decibels
as a condition of the zone change, and (2) the
structure be sighted so that usable open
spaces are generally shielded from the free-
way by the structure or noise attenuation walls.
Motion for ordinance It was moved by Councilman Hyde to place the
ordinance on its first reading.
Council discussion Councilman Scott questioned the need for an
open space easement.
Motion withdrawn Councilman Hyde withdrew his motion to place
the ordinance on first reading.
Motion for open space It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
easement Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried for
an additional amendment to the ordinance --
that a further condition be imposed stating that
prior to the filing of a parcel map on this
property, the northern segment be given as an
easement to the City for open space as a con-
dition of the zone change and, parenthetically,
the dimensions of it to be determined by the
staff.
City Council Meeting -10- January 6, 1976
6b. ORDINANCE NO. 1659 - It was moved by Councilman Hyde that this
AMENDING ZONING MAPS Ordinance be placed on its first reading as
ESTABLISHED BY SEC. 19.18.010 amended and that th~ reading of the text be
OF THE CITY CODE REZONING THAT waived by unanimous consent.
CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT
THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF 1-805 The City Council further certifies EIR-75-4.
AND EAST "J" STREET FROM UNZONED
TO R-1-H - FIRST READING
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,
to wit:'
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl, Scott, Hamilton
Noes: Councilman Hobel
Absent: None
CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded by
Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried that
the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted
with the exception of Item Number 10.
7. RESOLUTION NO. 7999 - The subdivision consists of 50 lots and is
APPROVING AND ACCEPTING located along Rivera Street, east of Oleander
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS IN Avenue. The developer, Time Development
THE APOLLO NO. 3 SUB- Company, has completed the public improvements
DIVISION and a final inspection was made on December 19,
1975 to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 8000 - One of the conditions for the approval of
ACCEPTING GRANT OF Tentative Parcel Map No. 15-75 was for the
EASEMENT FROM owners to grant a ten foot strip of land as
MERLE F. PALMER an easement for street tree purposes along
"E" Street. On December ] , 1975, Mr. Palmer
granted this easement.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 8001 - The Agreement for Public Health Services
AUTHORIZING THE SAN between the City and County indicates that the
DIEGO COUNTY DIRECTOR City ordinances must impose the same regulatory
OF PUBLIC HEALTH TO and penal provisions on incorporated territory
ENFORCE THE PROVISIONS within the City as does the related County
OF ORDINANCE NO. 1656 ordinances upon unincorporated territory.
RELATING TO FOOD Passage of this resolution will formalize the
HANDLERS intent of Ordinance No. 1656 (Food Handler
Ordinance).
(End of Consent Calendar)
10. RESOLUTION NO. 8002 - The current Civil Service Rule authorizes the
AMENDING RULE IX, SECTION use of sick leave for the Fire Fighters, re-
3, OF THE CIVIL SERVICE garding a family death, only in the event of a
RULES RELATING TO SICKNESS death in the immediate family of the employee.
AND DEATH LEAVE The proposed amendment allows the use of sick
leave in the event of the death of a member of
the immediate, family of an employee's spouse or
of a person who is a dependent of the employee.
The amendment further provides that Fire fighter
working a 60-hour week would be allowed up to
two shifts off with pay charged to sick leave.
City Council Meeting -11- January 6, 1976
Council Discussion Councilman Hyde questioned the annual cost
to the City. Councilman Scott wondered about
the wisdom of having to go through the Civil
Service for these changes. In view of the
fact that the City has negotiations with the
City employees and everything is spelled out
in a contract, that perhaps the Civil Service
Corm~ission has become antiquated.
City Attorney Lindberg agreed stating it is
a matter that should be considered in great
depth. The Charter would have to be amended.
Staff study requested Councilman Scott asked that the staff make a
study of this and find out what other cities
are doing in this regard.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Hyde, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl, Scott,
Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: None
Absent: None
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READINGS
11. RESOLUTION NO. 8003 - Mrs. Whitacre is moving to Boise, Idaho on
COMMENDING DIANNE WHITACRE, the 15th of this month. The Mayor presented
REPORTER FOR THE STAR-NEWS, her with this Resolution commending her on
FOR HER EXCELLENT COVERAGE her fair and accurate reporting of the City
OF THE ACTIONS OF THE CITY Council actions and that of the staff of
COUNCIL AND STAFF the City.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Egdahl, Hobel,
Hamilton, Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
12. RESOLUTION NO. 8004 - On December 16, 1975, the Council approved
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF the construction of 70~ of sewer in the 500
MONEY WHICH SHOULD BE block of Hilltop Drive and appropriated and
ASSESSED AGAINST CERTAIN authorized the expenditure of $1,367.88
PARCELS OF PROPERTY AT from the Sewer Income Fund. Director of
509 AND 511 HILLTOP DRIVE Public Works Robens recommended that the
BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF two benefitting properties pay a special
CERTAIN SEWER INSTALLATIONS assessment of $683.94 and a charge of 7%
interest per annum before being permitted
to connect to the City sewer system.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Egdahl, Hobel,
Hamilton, Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
City Council Meeting -12- January 6, 1976
13. RESOLUTION NO. 8005 - Bonita Builders constructed 287' of 8" sewer
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF MONEY main, including a sewer manhole, in Hilltop
WHICH SHOULD BE ASSESSED Drive, south of "H" Street to serve their four
AGAINST CERTAIN PARCELS OF parcels of property. Seven properties fronting
PROPERTY PRIOR TO MAKING SEWER on Hilltop Drive will benefit from this con~
CONNECTION BECAUSE OF BENEFIT struction. The Director of Public Works recom-
RECEIVED BY SAID PARCELS BY mended that the seven properties pay a special
THE CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER assessment of $604.66 and a charge of 7%
FACILITIES IN THE 500 BLOCK interest per annum before being permitted to
OF HILLTOP DRIVE connect to the City sewer system. Further,
that the five parcels lying within the County
of San Diego annex to the City at the time
of connection or within one year.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of
the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Egdahl, Hobel,
Hamilton, Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
14. RESOLUTION NO. 8006 - The developers of the Otay Industrial Park
DETERMINING THE AMOUNT OF have constructed a 10" sewer main in Otay
MONEY WHICH SHOULD BE Valley Road from Brandywine Avenue easterly
ASSESSED AGAINST CERTAIN to serve their development. The Director
PARCELS OF PROPERTY of Public Works recommended that those
PRIOR TO MAKING SEWER properties which will benefit from this
CONNECTION BECAUSE OF construction be assessed $329.278 per acre
BENEFIT RECEIVED BY SAID and the charge of 7% interest per annum at
PARCELS BY THE CONSTRUCTION the time the properties connect to the
OF SEWER FACILITIES IN OTAY City sewer system.
VALLEY ROAD FROM BRANDYWINE
AVENUE EASTERLY TO OTAY
INDUSTRIAL PARK FOR A DIS-
STANCE OF 4/5 MILE
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading
of the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Egdahl, Hobel,
Hamilton, Hyde
Noes: None
Absent: None
15. RESOLUTION NO. 8007 - The following bids were received on December
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING 23, 1975:
CONTRACT FOR STORM DRAIN IN
FOURTH AVENUE FROM M~MORIAL ~.~. · ~ ~ A~,~,at,
WAY TO "E" ST~ET - PROJECT ~.~. i ~... s~.t~. ~i~, ~.?::.(? ~,07?.~ *~,:~-~
#GT 24 ~ ~. ~, ~ c~o, ~,~.~s ~o,~,.4~ .....
It was recommended that the bids be accepted
and the contract awarded to R.J. & S.W.
Shacklett General Engineering Contractors
in the amount of $61,077.38 per Alternate
II of the bid proposal for corrugated steel
pipe. Further, that Council authorize the
expenditure of $67,000 from account #28-6100-
GT-24.
City Council Meeting -13- January 6, 1976
Time element questioned Councilman Egdahl questioned whether this work
should be done at the time the new Library
will be opening. Director of Public Works
Robens explained that the project would be
completed prior to the opening.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading
of the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hobel, Hamilton,
Hyde, Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
16. RESOLUTION NO. 8008 - The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was expanded
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN this year to add "Bilingual Election Require-
THE CITY AND DR. VALERIO S. ments" to cover areas with minority popula-
RODRIGUEZ FOR TRANSLATION tions such as California with its many Mexican-
SERVICES American and Asian-American residents. The
City Clerk is charged with providing a Spanish
translation of the election forms. Dr.
Rodriguez meets the qualifications as stipulated
in the Voting Rights Act.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Hyde, the reading
of the text was waived by unanimous consent,
passed and adopted by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Scott, Egdahl,
Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: None
Absent: None
17. RESOLUTION NO. 8009 - On December 23, 1975, the City Council
SETTING FORTH TERMS AND approved the terms and conditions regarding
CONDITIONS REGARDING Candidates Statements. Theyspecified, how-
CANDIDATES' STATEMENTS ever, that the candidate be allowed to take
AND CAMPAIGN MATERIAL advantage of including his campaign literature
MAILING in the sample ballot envelopes subject to
specifications delineated by the City Clerk.
City Clerk Fulasz submitted a memo to the
Council explaining the numerous problems
and cost associated with allowing this
project and urging the Council to not allow
the campaign mailing in the sample ballot
envelopes.
Original resolution offered Councilman Hyde offered the original resolution
which called for no campaign literature to
be mailed in the sample ballot envelopes.
The reading of the text was waived by unanimous
consent, passed and adopted by the following
vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Hyde, Scott, Egdahl,
Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: None
Absent: None
City Council Meeting -14- January 6, 1976
Councilman Hyde asked that the City Clerk
take a second look at this and continue to
try to find a way in which this can be done.
18. RESOLUTION City Attorney Lindberg submitted the Option
APPROVING OPTION AGREEMENT Agreement noting the purchase price of the
WITH HARBOR MANAGEMENT property ($1,750,000); the time schedule for
COP, PORATION FOR THIRD payments; the increased amount (3/4 of 1%)
AVENUE AND "H" STREET for each thirty day period after the first
PROPERTIES three months of escrow; and the actions of
the Board of Supervisors in this matter.
Executive Session requested Mayor Hamilton stated that the City Attorney
has requested an Executive Session before
Council consideration of this item.
Councilman Hyde asked that the Executive
Session be held at the close of the meeting.
Mayor Hamilton agreed and stated this item
would be postponed until the end of the
meeting.
19. ORDINANCE NO. 1660 - The Charter provides that compensation
AMENDING SECTION 2.04.580 shall be paid to Councilmen in accordance
OF THE CODE RELATING TO with the schedule established by the Govern-
COMPENSATION FOR COUNCILMEN ment Code of the State of California. The
- FIRST READING Code provides for increases of five percent
per annum to become effective subsequent to
the election of any new members to the City
Council.
It was recommended that the salary increase
be effective May 1, 1976 from $335.02 per
month to $369.36 per month.
Ordinance placed on first It was moved by Councilman Scott that this
reading ordinance be placed on its first reading
and that the reading of the text be waived
by unanimous consent.
The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hamilton
Hyde, Egdahl
Noes: None
Absent: None
20. REPORT OF CITY MANAGER
Report on City Newsletter City Manager Cole referred to his report
to the Council in which he detailed the
background of the City's Newsletter pub-
lished for five years beginning in 1964.
Mr. Cole noted the problems involved in at-
tempting to publish a quarterly newsletter,
the types of articles which would be published
and the cost of delivering the publication.
It was his recommendation that the Council
reject the concept of publishing a quarterly
newsletter at this time.
City Council Meeting -15- January 6, 1976
Report accepted It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
that the report be accepted.
Staff to bring matter Councilman Hobel requested that the staff
back at budget time bring this matter back for consideration
at the time the Council considers the budget.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS
21. REPORT ON BALLOT MEASURES City Attorney Lindberg referred to his
written report to the Council and discussed
four possible Charter amendments to be put
on the April 13 ballot:
(1) an extension of the original probationary
period for peace officers;
(2) right of hearing for any employee priortto
suspension or dismissal;
(3) establishing a salary for the Mayor;
(4) place of meetings.
Motion regarding Section 803 - It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
Rules and Regulations by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
(Peace Officers) that an appropriate amendment be made to the
Charter calling for removal of Section 803
and that this matter be put into the Civil
Service Rules and/or Memorandum of Understanding
with employee groups.
Motion regarding Section 807 - It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
Removal or Suspension of by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
Employees that this portion in the Charter be removed,
and if successful, those provisions be in-
corporated into the appropriate ordinances.
City Attorney Lindberg stated he would contact
the employee associations and work out the
appropriate ordinance to fill the void that
might be left by removal of this section.
Motion regarding Section 304 - City Attorney Lindberg added the stipulation
Presiding Officer, Mayor that this compensation would be for a full-
time Mayor. The recommended amendment allows
this Council to operate in the same manner as
any General Law city operating under the
Government Code of the State of California.
The alternative is for a salary-setting com-
mission.
Council discussion Mayor Hamilton voiced his opposition to the
salary setting committee stating that the
Council should have this responsibility.
Recess A recess was called at 11:00 p.m. and the
meeting reconvened at 11:10 p.m.
Motion regarding Section 304 - It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
Presiding Officer, Mayor by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that the City of Chula Vista will simply
abide by those sections of the General Law
cities on compensation for the Mayor.
City Council Meeting -16- January 6, 1976
25c. Item #25c. moved up on Agenda - It was moved by Councilman Hobel, seconded
Request for extension of time by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
on payment for improvements - that this item be moved up on the Agenda
Starlight Center at this time.
Motion to grant extension It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that this payment be deferred for 90 days.
21. Continuation of Item #21
Section 308 - Attorney Lindberg
explained
that
meetings
Place of Meetings shall be held in the Council Chamber at City
Hall except in cases of fire, flood, etc.
A provision has been added for special
meetings to be held within any place suitable
and desirable for public assembly within the
City and further, that the Council may meet
in joint session with other governing bodies.
MQtion to place on ballot It was moved by Councilman Egdahl and
seconded by Councilman Hyde that this pro-
posed amendment be placed on the ballot.
Discussion of motion Councilman Scott questioned whether official
business should be conducted away from City
Councilman Egdahl suggested a revision of
the sentences in the second paragraph of
the proposed amendment: Begin the paragraph
by stating that the City Council could meet
with other governing bodies and then put
in the first sentence regarding special
meetings but adding the provision of "no
special actions" to be taken.
City Attorney Lindberg asked that this meeting
be adjourned to Thursday, January 8 (after
the Redevelopment Agency meeting) and he
will revise the language of this amendment
and bring it back at that time for action.
Mayor Hamilton deferred this item until
the meeting to be called for Thursday, January
8, 1976.
22. REPORT ON CHULA VISTA'S In a memo to the City Council, Assistant City
MUNICIPAL ELECTION Attorney Beam discussed the current Chula
CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS Vista Campaign Ordinance stating that the
AND EXPENDITURES District Attorney, Mr. Edwin Miller, stated
ORDINANCE he would no longer be the enforcement officer
for the ordinance and expressed his reser-
vations concerning the constitutionality of
several of its provisions.
Mr. Beam cited the Attorney General's Opinion
(January 1974) in which the opinion ruled that
the Cities of Chula Vista, San Francisco
and San Diego (charter cities) were pre-
empted from adoption of a local ordinance
by provisions of state law.
City Council Meeting -17- January 6, 1976
Mr. Beam noted that the U. S. Supreme Court
is expected to rule shortly on a case which
is a challenge to the Federal Contribution
and Expenditure Limitation.
It was the City Attorney's recon~endation
that the Council direct a repeal of the local
ordinance until such time as a controversy
regarding ordinances of this type has been
settled.
Motion to accept It was by Councilman Scott and seconded
staff's
moved
recommendations by Councilman Hobel that the staff's recom-
mendation be accepted.
Discussion of motion Councilman Hyde agreed that those provisions
already covered by Proposition 9 should be
deleted in tha City's campaign ordinance;
however, he would like the following re-
quirements to remain:
1. Ceiling on the amount of expenditure funds
2. Fair Election Committee to remain in the
City
3. Limit on contributions
Enforcement Council discussion followed regarding the
lack of enforcement of the ordinance.
Assistant City Attorney Beam reported on the
challenges being made State-wide on this
type of ordinance. The provisions cited
by Councilman Hyde which he would like to see
remain in the ordinance are those that are
giving the most problems.
Motion failed The motion to accept the staff's recommendation
failed by the following vote:
Ayes: Councilman Hobel
NOES: Councilmen Hamilton, Hyde, Egdahl,
Scott
Absent: None
Change of vote Councilman Hobel stated he wished to change
his vote to a "no" vote; therefore, the
motion failed by unanimous vote.
Motion for revision It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
to ordinance by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
to direct the staff to prepare a revision
to the ordinance which would eliminate all
those portions of the ordinance which would
duplicate procedures and safeguards already
provided in State law with regard to election
reform.
Limitation on campaign City Attorney Lindberg noted that only Del
expenditures Mar has a limitation on expenditures and has
raised their amount to 18¢.
City Council Meeting -18- January 6, 1976
23. REPORT ON A~PEAL OF PLANNING On November 10, 1975, the Planning Commission
COI~ISSION DENIAL OF DEFERRAL considered a request of Mr. Lawrence P.
FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - Colman, owner of the property at 368 Hilltop
368 HILLTOP DRIVE Drive, for a deferral of the construction of
public improvements fronting his property.
The Commission denied this request and recom-
mended that the staff investigate the pos-
sibility of using the short form of the 1911
Improvement Act procedure to complete the
improvements along the west side of Hilltop
Drive between Center and "G" Street.
The Director of Public Works submitted a
written report to the Council in which he
recommended that the Council defer the
improvements for a period not to exceed
2 years in order to give staff time to create
an improvement district in that area.
Report accepted It was moved by Councilman Hobel, seconded
by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the staff recommendation be accepted -
defer the improvement and include these
parcels in a 1911 Act within 24 months.
24. REPORT ON ADMINISTRATIVE The Director of Parks & Recreation submitted
COSTS FOR OPEN SPACE a summary of the administrative costs for
DISTRICTS Open Space Districts. Based on 987 units,
the annual cost would be $5,004.62 or $5.07
per year per unit.
It was the recommendation of the Director
of Parks & Recreation that the City adminis-
trative costs not be assessed to these districts
at this time but that the service be reviewed
annually during the second week in January -
that this be considered for assessment spread
based upon a cost versus benefit ratio.
Staff recommendations It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded
accepted by Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that the staff's recommendation be accepted.
Director of Parks Mr. Hall explained that the assessments are
& Recreation Hall calculated in April but not payable Until
December. He is beginning to see the bene-
fits not only to the property owner but
to the area in general from these open space
districts. He asked that the Council allow
bringing in the next two or three districts
and then he will do an intensive study of
the benefits.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Endorsement of member Mayor Hamilton remarked that he received a
to Transit Board request from National City to ratify the
appointment of City Councilman Joseph Louis
Camacho as representative to the new Transit
Authority and the nomination of Michael Dalla
as alternate.
Councilman Scott felt the alternate should
come from Imperial Beach (the second city
selected) in order to have continuity on
the Board when a change takes place. Further,
the alternate receives all the material
published by the Board.
City Council Meeting -19- January 6, 1976
Motion for recommendation It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded
to Cities by Mayor Hamilton that the Council recommend
to the Cities of National City and Imperial
Beach that a member of the Council of the
City coming up next on the list be designated
as the alternate.
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote,
to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Hobel, Hamilton
Noes: Councilmen Hyde, Egdahl
Absent: None
Motion for endorsement It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded
by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the appointment of Joseph Louis Camacho
be endorsed.
EXECUTIVE SESSION It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded by
Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried that
an Executive Session be called at the close
of this meeting for litigation purposes.
Field Trip It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that the City Manager prepare a Council
field trip of City facilities - park facilities
and those areas of concern that might be
coming up at budget time.
Status report on trash It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
problem by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that the City Manager give the Council a status
report on the La Belle Pizza trash problem
in two weeks.
EIR on "J" Street project Councilman Egdahl said he talked to Port
Commissioner Bob Campbell and he pointed
out that Chula Vista was the only city
that did not respond to the EIR on the
dredging project.
Motion for staff response It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded
by Mayor Hamilton and unanimously carried
that the staff give this response.
Publication of precinct Councilman Hyde referred to his conversation
and polling place list with the City Clerk regarding the publication
of precincts and polling places. The voters
receive their designated polling place in
their sample ballot envelopes and publishing
this list is both duplicating and costly.
Motion to contact legislators It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded by
Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that this matter be brought to the attention
of Assemblyman Deddeh and Congressman Van
Deerlin asking them to consider proposed
legislation which would eliminate the re-
quirement for the publication by public
notice of the election precincts.
City Council Meeting -20- January 6, 1976
Meeting with Congressman Mayor Hamilton reported on the meeting held
Van Deerlin with Congressman Van Deerlin concerning
revenue sharing. Mr. Van Deerlin would not
give his committment on how he would vote on
revenue sharing. The Mayor declared it was
i~cumbent upon this Council to keep after Mr.
Van Deerlin and keep the matter in front of
the public - that the City needs and desires
a continuation of revenue sharing.
25. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Verified claim for damages - Ms. Hermanson filed a claim in the amount
Jeanne Hermanson of $99.69 stating that on December 7, 1975
962 Corte Maria the City sewer line backed up causing some
Chula Vista flooding in her residence.
Claim denied It was moved by Councilman Hyde, seconded
by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the claim be denied and turned over
to the City's insurance carrier for in-
vestigation.
b. Verified claim for damages - The City of National City submitted a claim
City of National City in the amount of $276.64 stating that on
1200 "A" Avenue October 27, 1975 an unattended vehicle
National City belonging to the City of Chula Vista rolled
into a parked pound truck belonging to the
City of National City (driveway of 690 Otay
Valley Road).
Claim denied It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
that the claim be denied and turned over
to the City's insurance carrier for in-
vestigation.
c. Request for 90-day extension (See page 16 of these minutes)
of time for payment of Oneida
Street Improvements
d. Letter of resignation - Mr. Tieber submitted his letter of resignation
Anthony P. Tieber, stating that he is moving out of the City and
Parks & Recreation will no longer be able to serve on this
Commission.
Accepted with regret It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that the resignation be accepted with regret
and proper recognition be given to Mr. Tieber.
e. Request for rejection of Mr. Dunn requested that the proposal for a
dump site - J. Fred Dunn dump site in the northwest quadrant of 1-805
222 Dovary Road and East "H" Street, adjoining his residence,
be rejected.
City Manager Cole reported that the Public
Works Department is considering the use of
this property for the disposal of excavated
soil materials. This material will be excess
soils from trenches from the construction and
repair of sewer laterals by City forces in
street right-of-way and will be deposited at
a rate of 6 to 10 truckloads a week. ERC
has determined that environmental effects of
the project are such that an EIR need not be
written and that a negative declaration can
be issued.
City Council Meeting -21- January 6, 1976
Mr. Robens said he discussed this with
Mr. Dunn and he was at the Environmental
Review Committee meeting and received a full
explanation.
Mayor Hamilton commented he would like to
see something in there about the compaction
of the fill material.
Councilman Scott indicated that the Council
should consider, at budget time, plans for
that property, such as a soccer field.
Motion to bring the matter It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded
back at budget session by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried
that this matter be brought back at budget
session.
Recess to Executive Session The Council recessed to Executive Session
at 12:03 a.m. and the meeting reconvened at
12:22 a.m.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hamilton adjourned the meeting at
12:22 a.m. to Thursday, January 8, 1976 at
7:30 p.m.