HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1976/01/08 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Thursday January 8, 1976
An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California,
was held on the above date beginning at 9:03 p.m. (immediately following the Redevelopment
Agency meeting) in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, with the
following
Councilmen present: Mayor Itamilton, Councilmen Scott, ttobel, Hyde, Egdahl
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Community Development
Director Desrochers, Community Development Coordinator Henthorn,
Director of Parks and Recreation Hall
2. ITEM MOVED UP ON AGENDA - Mayor Hamilton announced that Item 2 will be
AGREEMENT WITH HARBOR moved up on the agenda at this time.
MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
Motion for Executive Session It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded by
Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried that
an Executive Session be called for pending
litigation purposes.
Attendance at Session Mayor Hamilton asked the members present from
the County staff~ representative from Wilsey
and Ham, and members of the City staff to
attend the Executive Session.
The Council recessed to Executive Session at
9:07 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:34 p.m.
1. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Community Development Director Desrochars
BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION said he would like to coincide the receipt of the Block Grant as closely as possible
with the fiscal year. Mr. Desrochers ex-
plained the purpose and function of the Block
Grant noting that 80% of the monies must be
spent on physical programs and 20% can be
spent on Mocial services.
Mr. Desrochers itemized the list of last
year's program and the community's requests
for this year's allotment.
Programs not recommended Mr. Desrochers declared that the staff is not
recommending the acquisition of "Our House"
because it,s an historical building, and
to purchase the property for the exclusive
use of "Our H~us~' would not meet the 80% -
20% HUD requirement -- it would be more than
two thirds of the budget.
Starlight Center is also not recommended
since they are operating under a non-profit
organization - not a public corporation, and
the City would have to construct a public
building for them on public property.
City Council Meeting -2- January 8, 1976
Otay Multi-Purpose Center - The staff cannot
recommend this request since they are un-
aware of how it will be operated and its
ramificatiohs.
Jack Henthorn, Community Mr. Henthorn discussed and explained the
Development Coordinator charts displayed for the Council:
Chart 1 - Social Service Requests
Chart 2 - Parks and Recreation and Neigh-
borhood Facilities
Chart 3 - Demolition, Acquisition and Re-
habilitation
Chart 4 - Public Works Facilities
Chart 5 - Miscellaneous
(Chart 5 includes Economic Development -
$10,000; Citizen Participation - $8,000;
Third Avenue Survey and Planning - $30,000;
and YMCA/Boys Club Site Acquisition -$100,000,
for a grand total of $1,352,000 + requests.)
Mr. Henthorn remarked that since the City
will be getting $572,000, the staff had to
prioritize the items.
Staff recommendations The following is the recommendation of the
staff:
Pro,ram Cost
Norman Park Center Conference Room $ 3,000
Senior Citizens 6,500
Mueller Park (Phase II) 33,000
Architectural Barriers 5,000
Curbs, Gutters, Sidewalks 50,000
Acquisition/Spot Clearance 150,000
Economic Development 2,000
Citizen Participation 3,000
Third Avenue Studies 10,000
Administration 40,000
Local Option 20,000
Rehabilitation Loans 125,000
Building Surveys and Inspections 15,000
Broadway Storm Drain, "J" - "K" 47,000
Loma Verde Landscaping and Trails 62,500
Total $572,000
Capital Improvement Programs In answer to Councilman Scott's q~ery, it was
explained that the capital improvements
programs, such as the Broadway Storm Drain
project, was put into the program to move them
up rather than wait the two years as proposed
for this particular program.
City Council Meeting -3- January 8, 1976
Swimming Pool at Councilman Hobel referred to the Youth
Hilltop Park Commission's recommendation not to put a
Youth Center at Hilltop Park; however, at
budget sessions, the Council did talk about
a swimming complex as a joint powers with
the School District.
Entrance signs to City Another suggestion offered by Councilman
Hobel was to consider the Chamber of
Commerce's request for entrance signs to
the City - this was done in a Spanish motif
and proposed for 1-5 and "E" Street and
1-805 near Bonita Road.
Norman Park Center Councilman Scott said he had two objections
Conference Room to this request: (2) Norman Park is now
overbuilt to still maintain it as a park;
(2) the multipurpose center at Otay Park
was rejected because the staff is making
a study on the human care services and yet,
this conference room meets that same ob-
jection.
Mr. Henthorn stated that the conference
room was a misnomer - the room is proposed
to be built at the southwest corner of the
building and is to be used for a number of
purposes.
Councilman Egdahl objected to adding on to
buildings indicating that it destroys the
original architecture. He added that the
Congregational Towers, built with government
funds, is required to have community use of
some of its rooms. Councilman Egdahl asked
that the staff explore this.
Motion to delete Norman It was moved by Councilman. Egdahl, seconded
Park Conference Room by Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the $3,000 recommended for the Norman
Park Conference Room be shifted to the Third
Avenue Studies increasing this project to
$13,000.
Motion to accept staff's
It was moved by Mayor Hamilton, seconded by
recommendations
Councilman Scott and unanimously carried
that the staff's recommendations be approved
with the modifications made by the Council.
Social Services Disscussion ensued concerning the social
services requests. Mr. Henthorn indicated
~hat the staff was hesitant to recommend
programs that may become an on-going re-
sponsibility to the City.
Youth Center/Swimming Pool Councilman Scott referred to the changing
attitudes of the Youth in their desire to
now have a Youth Center at Hilltop.
Mayor Hamilton directed the staff to keep
this on the chart and also to bring it back
to the Council at budget time.
City Council Meeting -4- January 8, 1976
Funding of Senior Services Councilman Hobel asked the staff to check
into the area of funding a portion of the
old library building to be used for a Senior
Services Center.
2. RESOLUTION It was moved by Councilman Hobel, seconded
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
THE CITY AND HARBOR ~tANAGE- that this matter be held over to the next
MENT CORPORATION FOR OPTION City Council Meeting (January 13, 1976).
PURPOSES FOR THIRD AVENUE
AND "H" STREET PROPERTIES
3. RESOLUTION It was moved by Councilman Hobel, seconded
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE by Councilman Hyde and unanimously carried
OF THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL that this matter be held over to the next
ELECTION City Council meeting (January 13, 1976).
4. CITY MANAGER'S P~PORT
Law Enforcement Services City Manager Cole said he received a letter
from the Law and Justice Agency requesting
the City to consider providing law enforcement
service, on a contractual basis, to the
Montgomery/Otay area.
Motion to consider It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded
by Councilman Hobel and unanimously carried
that this matter be considered.
5. MAYOR'S REPORT The Mayor had no report.
6. COUNCIL CO~MENTS
Lengthy meetings Councilman Scott discussed the lengthy Council
meetings suggesting that either the Council
should cut the meetings off a 11:00 p.m. or
meet more often.
Motion for meeting cut- It was moved by Mayor Hamilton and seconded
off time by Councilman Scott that the meetings be
concluded at 11:00 p.m. and if the entire
business has not been conducted within that
period, it will be adjourned until the
following Thursday.
Five minute timing Discussion followed regarding invoking the
five minute limitation on speakers; cutting
down on Council discussions; limiting the
number of public hearings for one meeting;
and the objections of setting aside another
evening for meetings.
Thursday evening Mayor Hamilton stated he will withdraw meeting
withdrawn from motion on Thursday evenings from the motion.
Objection to cut- Mayor Hamilton indicated it was difficult
off time to enforce the 5-minute rule -- it would be
rude for the Mayor to continually look at
his watch. If he had a timer, or a lighting
device, he would enforce this provision.
City Council Meeting -5- January 8, 1976
The Council concurred that the Mayor should
also extend bis prerogative to "discipline"
the Council in their deliberations.
Motion withdrawn Mayor Hamilton withdrew his motion; Councilman
Scott withdrew the second.
Items can be moved Councilman Egdahl suggested the Mayor make
up on the agenda known to the people in the audience that if
they are there to speak on any item, to let
the Council know and these could be moved
up on the agenda.
Timer Mayor Hamilton directed the staff to get a
timer and lighting device installed in the
Chamber.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hamilton adjourned the meeting at 10:53 p.m.
to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, January
13, 1976 at 7:00 p.m.
City ~Slerk /