The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcc min 1994/05/17 RDA JOINT MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY COUNCIL · = OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, May 17, 1994 Council Chambers 10:34 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Agency/Council Members Fox, Horton, Moore, and Chairman/Mayor Nader_ ABSENT: Agency/Council Member Rindone ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director/City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard, Agency/City Attorney; and Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 5, 1994 and April 19, 1994 MSC (Fox/Horton) to approve the minutes of April 5, 1994 and April 19, 1994 as presented. Approved 4-0-1 with Rindone absent. CONSENT CALENDAR (Item pulled: 4) 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None. 4. RESOLUTION 1403 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH IDM SATELLITE DIVISION, INC., FOR THE REMODELLING OF BUILDING AT 311 F STREET-On 4/5/94 the Agency approved an Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) with IDM Satellite Division, Inc. for the remodelling of 311 F Street. Subsequent to approval of the OPA the applicant had to make changes to the floor plans. Thu change requires the OPA be amended. This item was continued from the meeting ~. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Community Development Director) Pulled from the Consent Calendar. Bruce Boogaard, Agency Attorney, clarified that the resolution in the Agency packet varied from the agenda report as his department was unable to review the proposed agreement in time to make recommendations. They had reviewed the agreement since and staff concurred with the recommendations of the City Attorney's office. The difference between the resolution and the report was that the resolution required the first amendment be modified to require a promissory note with interest at 5% compounded monthly with a fixed due date of 180 days. Staff also requested authority to correct the original agreement appruved by the Agency on 4/5/94 between Chula Vista and IDM Satellite Division, Inc. Upon doing the due diligence and receiving the title report there was a slight error in the name of the owner and that would be corrected. Member Moore questioned if the individual would not be ready to occupy, why they should have to pay an in-lieu parking fee before the building was occupied which would bring the cars, Minutes May 17, 1994 Page 2 Mr. Boogaard responded that it was a philosophical point which could be changed. The typical arrangement was that they were due upon issuance of the building permits. The City was giving a break to the individual due to the financing problems and difficulty in getting the tenant to occupy the additional space created by the second floor improvement. RESOLUTION 1403 OFFERED BY MEMBER MOORE, reading of the text was waived. Chairman Nader stated the action by the Agency was the next step in getting the Chula Vista Telecenter. VOTE ON RESOLUTION 1403: approved 4-0-1 with Rindone absent. * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARENGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES 5. PUBLIC HEARING APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUTO DISMANTLING BUSINESS AT 791 ENERGY WAY WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA--The establishment of an auto dismantling land use within the Otay Valley Redevelopmeat Area requires a Special Land Use Permit. The subject application has been reviewed by staff and the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee and has received Negative Declaration IS-94-14. The application is now presented to the Agency for final determination. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Community Development Director) RESOLUTION 1405 ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-94-14 AND APPROVING A SPECIAL LAND USE PERMIT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AUTO DISMANTLING BUSINESS AT 791 ENERGY WAY This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open. There being no public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed. RESOLUTION 1405 OFFERED BY AGENCY MEMBER FOX, reading of the text was waived. Member Moore questioned if the companies were still be treated as temporary. He questioned how long they had been on site. Martin Miller, Assistant Planner, responded that it was a new business and would be there until 2006. Bruce Boogaard, Agency Attorney, stated they also had the option to renew upon approval by the Zoning Administrator. The term was consistent with the term granted in the Siroonian litigation. Member Moore questioned what improvements were required for those that were there from the beginning. Mr. Miller responded that a number of the other users were undergoing site plan approval to ensure there was adequate parking, landscaping, fencing, etc. Even though it was for twelve years the redevelopmeat of the area was what was in consideration. It would depend on when redevelopmeat took place. VOTE ON RESOLUTION 1405: approved 4-0-1 with Rindone absent. Minutes May 17, 1994 Page 3 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None ACTION ITEMS 6. AGENCY RESOLUTION 1390 ADOPTING THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BUDGET FOR Fir 1993-94 AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR-The FY 1993-94 Re. development Agency Budget was reviewed as part of the City budget approval process. As the Redevelopment Agency is a separate legal eatity, it is necessary to approve the budget separately as required by California Community Redevelopment Law. The formal Agency adoption of the budget had been delayed in order to determine the full impact of State budget re, solutions end to complete the evaluation of staffing needs for the Economic Development function in the Cornm~lnity Development Department as directed by City Council during and subsequent to the City's budget review process. This item was continued from the meeting of April 19, 1993. Staff requests the Agency hold a Spedal Meeting on Tuesday. May 24, 1994. (Community Development Director) [4/5ths Vote Required] John Goss, Director, informed the Agency that staff requested that Items 6 and 7 be continued to a special meeting of 5/24/94. That meeting was becoming very lengthy and he recommended that they be continued to the budget meeting on 5/23/94. MS (Nader/Fox) to continue ltenis 6 and 7 to the budget workshop scheduled on 5/23/94 at 6:00 p.m. in the Coundl Conference Room. Appcoved 4-0-I with Rindone absent. 7.A. COUNCIL RESOLUTION 17478 APPROVING CHULA VISTA DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION 1994 BUDGET AND ACCEPTING THE ASSOCIATION'S 1993 ANNUAL REPORT--In accordance with Chula Vista Municipal Code, the Chula Vista Downtown Association (aka, Downtova~ Business Association, DBA) is required to submit an annual report and budget for Council 's approval. A copy of the Association's Annual Report and 1994 Work Plan and Budget is being submitted for Council's consideration. In 1991 the Agency agreed to fund the Town Manager portion through fiscal year 1993-94. Staff is recommending the agreement and funding be extended through one additional fiscal year. Staff requests the Agency hold a Special Meeting on Tuesday, May 24, 1994. (Community Development Director/Interim Finance Administrator) B. AGENCY RESOLUTION 1404 APPROVING A ONE-YEAR EXTENSION TO CHULA VISTA DOWNTOWN ASSOCIATION AGREEMENT FOR TOWN MANAGER MS (Nader/Fox) to continue Ituns 6 and 7 to the budget workshop scheduled on 5/23/94 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room. Approved 4-0-1 with Rindone absent. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Item pulled: 4. The minutes will reflect ihe published agenda order. OTHER BUSINESS 8. DIRECTOR'S/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) - None Minutes May 17, 1994 Page 4 9. CItAIRMAN~S/MAYOR'S REPORT(S} - None 10. AGENCY/COUNCIL ME1VIBER COMMENTS - None CLOI~ED SESSION The Agency met in Closed Session at 10:45 p.m. and reconvened at 12:18 a.m. with no report given. 11. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR REGARDING: i. Imstrnctions to negotiatom pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 · Property: 746 Ada Street and 750 Ada Street (APN 622-020-20 and 622-020-03) at the northwest corner of Ada Street and Industrial Boulevard · Negotiating Parties: Rexlevelopment Agency staff and for the Property Owner (Trolley Terrace Development, Inc., a California Corporation) · Under Negotiation: Instruction to negotiators will concern price and terms of payment. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT AT 12:20 P.M. to the Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting on June 7, 1994 at 4:00 p.m., immediately follow'rag the City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk by: Vicki C. Soderqui~t, Deputy Ct~,~r~k