HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/07/21
Tuesday, July 21, 1992
6:00 p.m.
III deciara under penaity of per)u.ry t~at I art.
employed by the City of Chula Vista In the
OHice of the City Clerk and that I posted
this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin B~ard at .
the Public Services Building and !!,t ~lty HiijI on/. . CounCIl Chambers
DATED, .~ /, <?/,7~.'SIGNED y., \./ /' ;.Y, ,Pubhc Semces Bulldmg
l~ r
Resmlar MeetinS! of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALL TO ORDER
Councilmembers Grasser Horton _, Malcolm -' Moore _, Rindone _, and Mayor
Nader _
1.
ROIl. CALL:
2. PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE TO TI-IE FLAG. SILENf PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
June 9, 1992 (Adjourned Meeting/Workshop), July 23, 1992, and
June 30, 1992.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF TI-IE DAY:
a. Introduction of students from our Sister City, Irapuato, Mexico, who are here on the Kellogg
Grant working at the Nature Interpretive Center - Commissioner Nancy Taboada,
Coordinator of Sister Cities International Youth Exchange, will introduce the students.
b. Proclaiming the inonth of July as "Parks & Recreation Month". The proclamation will be
presented to Bob Lind, Chair, Parks & Recreation Commission.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 11)
The staff reconrmendJJtions regarding the following iJems listed under the Consent CaJendor will be enJJCted by the
Council by <me motion without discussion unless a CounciJmember, a member of the publil; or City staff requests
that the iJem be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on <me of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommeruJotion; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendlltion.) Items pul1ed from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items and Board and
Commission Recommendlltions. Items pulled by the publil; will be the fust iJems of business.
5. WRITfEN COMMUNlCATIONS:
a. Letter requesting $3,000 to assist in paying for Shuttle Bus services throughout Bonitafest
Day, 9/26/92, as well as services provided by the Chula VISta Police Department -
Marguerite Maniscalco, Bonitafest Chairwoman, Bonita Business & Professional Association,
P. O. Box 284, Bonita, CA 92002. It is recommended that the request be referred to staff
for further evaluation.
b. Letter requesting waiver of any license requirements for Burton C. Tiffany Elementary
School PTA Craft Fair on 11/21/92 - MariIee Castenholz McKelvey, Craft Fair Chair, 1615
Gotham St., Chula Vista, CA 91913.
Agenda
-2-
July 21, 1992
6.A RESOLUTION 16710 ACCEPTING ASTATE OF CAlJFORNIAHOUSEHOlD HAZARDOUS WASTE
GRANT TO ESTABUSH A HOUSEHOlD HAZARDOUS WASTE EDUCATION
PROJECT - Last February, Council authorized staff to submit a grant
application to the State of California Integrated Waste Management Board.
The City has been notified of an award of $25,050. Under the grant, the
City will establish a Household Hazardous Waste Reduction, Alternatives,
and Disposal Educational Awareness Project. Staff recommends approval
of the resolutions. (Administration)
B. RESOLUTION 16711 AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BUDGET TO ADD A TEMPORARY,
PART-TIME POSmON IN UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE IN THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING FlJNDS FOR SUCH
PROGRAM AND POSITION - 4/Sth's vote required.
7. RESOLUTION 16712 RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION HElD ON
JUNE 2, 1992, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS
AS PROVIDED BY LAW - Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(City Clerk)
8. RESOLUTION 16713 APPROVING A "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" 5K FUN RUNI2 MILE WALK TO
BE HElD AT BAYSIDE PARK ON AUGUST 4, 1992 AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A HOlD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION
AGREEMENT WITH THE PORT DISTRICT FOR TIllS EVENT - The event
represents the ninth annual "National Night Out" which is a nationwide
effort to heighten crime prevention awareness, strengthen neighborhood
spirit and police-community relations, generate support and participation
for local crime prevention programs and sending a message to criminals
that our communities are organized and fighting back! All neighborhoods
across the country are encouraged to turn on their outside lights from 8:00
to 10:00 p.m. and spend the evening outdoors. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Chief of Police)
9.A RESOLUTION 16714 APPROVING THE INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS AND DESCRIBING THE
IMPROVEMENTS FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 26 (pARK
BONITA) - In order to initiate the proceedings for the formation of open
space districts, the City Engineer must prepare and file a report in
accordance with the Streets and Highways Code. The resolution will begin
the process for the formation of the open space district for Park Bonita.
Staff recommends: (1) Approve the resolution and the Engineer's report;
(2) Council declare intention to form the proposed district in accordance
with Section 17.07 of the Municipal Code and Section 22587 of the Streets
and Highways Code; (3) Direct the City Clerk to notice the public hearing
in accordance with Sections 22556 and 22588 of the Streets and Highways
Code; and, (4) Set 8/18/92, at 6:00 p.m., as the date and time for public
hearing. (Director of Public Works and Director of Parks & Recreation)
B. RESOLUTION 16715 FlUNG AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND DECLARING THE CITY'S
INTENTION TO ESTABUSH CHULA VISTA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
NUMBER 26 (pARK BONITA) AND SEmNG THE TIME AND PLACE FOR
HEARING THEREON
Agenda
-3-
July 21, 1992
lOA RESOLUTION 16716 ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN PROCEEDINGS AND
ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 90-1 (SALT CREEK
I) - On 10/22/91, Council established Assessment District Number 90-1
(Salt Creek I) and levied assessments for the acquisition and financing of
certain infrastructure improvements serving the Salt Creek I development
pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The improvements
have now been completed and it is necessary that the proceedings be
finalized and the 1915 Act bonds be sold to provide the funds for the
improvement acquisition. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions.
(Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLUTION 16717 AUlHORIZING CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BONDS TO BE SOLD AT
A PUBUC SALE AND DIRECIlNG A CALL FOR SEALED BIDS IN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
11. RESOLUTION 16718 WAIVING TIiE COMPETITIVE BIDDING PROCESS AND APPROVING TIiE
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 SERVICE AGREEMENT Willi AMERICAN DIGITAL
SYSTEMS (ADS) SERVICES FOR TIiE MAINTENANCE OF EIGHT SEWAGE
FLOW METERS AND APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL AMOUNf OF
$8,104 - American Digital Systems (ADS) Services and the City had two
service agreements for Fiscal Year (FY) 1991-92 for the repair and
preventive maintenance services for six sewage flow metering stations. The
cost of the service agreement for the six existing sewage flow metering
stations will increase from $17,220 in FY 1991-92 to $23,772 in FY 1992-
93. With the inclusion of two new metering stations which will begin
operation during this fiscal year, the maximum service cost for FY 1992-93
will increase to $30,724. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required.
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The foUowing items have been adveriised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recornmerukJtion.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual
12.
PUBUC HEARING
CONSIDERATION OF REVISIONS TO CHAPTER 5.20 OF TIiE MUNICIPAL
CODE, TIiE CARDROOM ORDINANCE - On 4/28/92, Council received a
staff report and heard public testimony upon a proposal to change Section
5.20 of the Municipal Code known as the Cardroom Ordinance. As a result
of that discussion, staff was directed to prepare a report and schedule a
public hearing on the subject proposal. Six specific Cardroom Ordinance
revision issues were identified by Council. Staff met informally with
cardroom operators, other members of the community and experts in
California gaming law. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first
reading. (Chief of Police) Continued from the meeting of 6/30/92.
Agenda
ORDINANCE 2523
13.
PUBUC HEARING
.4-
July 21, 1992
AMENDING SECTIONS 5.20.020 AND 5.20.035 OF 1HE MUNICIPAL CODE
(first readin.,)
CONSIDERATION OF RATE INCREASE FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
OF REFUSE. Since 1986, Laidlaw Waste Systems, in accotdance with the
Franchise Ordinance, has been entitled to request an annual rate increase
for the collection and disposal of refuse. The staff report recommends
approval of a proposed rate increase and discusses related issues. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Finance) Continued
from the meeting of 6/30/92.
RESOLUTION 16719 APPROVING RATE SCHEDULES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF
REFUSE EFFECTIVE JULY 1,1992 AND SEPTEMBER 1,1992
14.
PUBUC HEARING
CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 59 FOR
1HE CONSfRUCTION OF TWO STORAGE SHEDS AND A COVERED WORK
AREA AT 1HE SAN DffiGO GAS AND ELECfRIC (SDG&E) SOUTIi BAY
POWER PLANT - SDG&E has submitted an application to construct two
storage sheds and a covered work area within an existing warehouse area
at the South Bay Power Plant site. The project site is south of "L" Street
and west of Interstate 5 which is within the Southwest Redevelopment
Project, however, no special redevelopment actions are required. The
proposal is a Class 3 exemption from environmental review. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community
Development) Continued from the meeting of 6/23/92.
RESOLUTION 16682 ISSUING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 59 FOR 1HE
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STORAGE SHEDS AND A COVERED WORK
AREA AT 1HE SDG&E SOUTIi BAY POWER PLANT
15. PUBUC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-92-40: APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO CONSfRUCT INTERIM FIRE
STATION NUMBER 6 AT 1HE SOUTIiWESf CORNER OF LANE AVENUE
AND FENTON STREET; APPEU.ANT - CAUFORNIA LAND ASSOCIATES .
Appeal of Planning Commission approval of PCC-92-40. Staff recommends
continuation to the meeting of 7/28/92. (Director of Planning)
16. PUBUC HEARING CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 11 FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-
93 AND ANNEXATION OF LYNNDALE HIUS SUBDMSION . In accordance
with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared
reports on the spread of assessments for the open space districts. The
reports were accepted and the required public hearing was set by Council
at its meeting of 6/23/92. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions.
(Director of Public Works and Director of Parks & Recreation)
A. RESOLUTION 16720 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACIUTIES TO
BE MAINfAlNED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 11
Agenda
-5-
July 21, 1992
B. RESOLUTION 16721 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF LAND KNOWN AS LYNNDALE H1il.'i
SUBDMSION (CHULA VISTA TRACf 90-6) TO OPEN SPACE DISTRlCf
NUMBER 11
17. PUBIJC HEARING CI1Y OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRlCTS 1-10, 14, IS, 17, 18,20;
EASTLAKEMAINTENANCE DISTRlCfNUMBER 1; BAY BOULEVARD AND
TOWN CENTRE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 - In accordance with the City
Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer prepared reports on the
spread of assessments for the open space districts. The reports were
accepted and the required public hearing was set by Council at its meeting
of 6/23/92. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Public Works and Director of Parks & Recreation)
RESOLUTION 16722 ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE AND MAINTENANCE FACIIJTIES TO
BE MAINTAINED AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRlCf NUMBERS 1-10, 14, IS, 17, 18, 20;
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRlCf NUMBER 1; TOWN CENTRE I
LANDSCAPING DISTRlCf, AND BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING
DISTRlCf
18. PUBIJC HEARING FORMATION OF CHULA VISTA OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRlCf
NUMBER 24, CANYON VIEWS - On 6/30/92, Council approved the
Engineer's Report on the proposed Open Space District Number 24, Canyon
Views, and set 7/21/92 as the date for a public hearing on the proposed
formation. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Director of
Public Works) 4/5th's vote required.
A RESOLUTION 16723 ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE FORMATION OF OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRlCf NUMBER 24, CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM
AND LEVYING ASSESSMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
B. RESOLUTION 16724 ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRlCT NUMBER 24
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject 1TUltIeT wiIhin the Council's
jurisdiaion tIuJt is not an item on this agenda. (Stille law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
tilking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a
subject, pleiJse complete the yellow .Request to Speak Under Oral CommuniI:ations Form' available in the lobby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are erpected to elicit substJmliaI discussions and deliberations by the
Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff
recommendations may in certJlin cases be presented in the aItemative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out
a .Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five minutes.
Agenda
-6-
July 21, 1992
19. ORDINANCE 2524 AMENDING SECl10N 2.30.020 OF TIiE MUNI<JPAL CODE RELATING TO
MEMBERSHIP ON TIiE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (firsr
readinld - Ordinance 2380 creating the City's Economic Development
Commission (EDC) was approved by Council on 7/17/90. On 10/9/90,
Council amended Sections 2.30.020 and 2.30.060 to expand EDC
membership from seven to nine commissioners. The recommended
ordinance is being proposed by the Economic Development Commission
and provides language outlining specific areas of expertise which should
be drawn from in Council's selection of appointees. Tbe purpose is to
encourage a well balanced membership representing expertise vital to the
EDe's role in developing, recommending and implementing economic
development strategies. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first
reading. (Director of Community Development)
20. RESOLUTION 16725 APPROVING ADDITIONAL CONTIUBUTIONS TO ASSESSMENTS IN
CONJUNCl10N WI1H ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 90-2 (OTAY
VALLEY ROAD) - On 6/23/92, Council confirmed the assessments for
Assessment District Number 90-2, Otay Valley Road. At that meeting,
Council directed staff to reconsider certain property owner requests for
additional credit for slopes and constructed improvements. Staff
recommends Council: (1) approve an additional contribution of $20,973
to Ms. Gregory's assessment for improvements constructed; (2) deny Mr.
Teyssier's, Mr. Barber's and Mr. Brady's requests for additional
contributions to their assessments; and, (3) approve an additional
contribution to Mr. Cushman's assessment for slopes. (Director of Public
Works and Director of Community Development)
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider iIems whkh have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or CommiJtees.
None submitted.
ITEMS PUlLED FROM TIiE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council wi/J discuss iIems which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda
iIems puI/ed at the request of the publU: wi/J be considered prior to those puI/ed by CounciImembers. PublU:
comments are limited to five minutes per individual
OTIiERBUSINESS
21. <JTI MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
Agenda
-7-
July 21, 1992
22. MAYOR'S REPORTfS)
a. Ratification of appointments to Boards/Commissions/Committees -
Commission on Aging: Anne H. Fabrick;
Charter Review Commission: Jack Blakely, and C.R. Campbell;
Child Care Commission: Nancy Cavanaugh and Cindy Johns;
Cultural Arts Commission: Dency Souval and Lori Chan Luna;
Design Review Committee: John C. Rodriguez;
Economic Development Commission: Chuck Peter;
Parks & Recreation Commission: Clifford Roland;
Otay Valley Project Area Committee: A.Y. Casillas and Don Palumbo;
Youth Commission: Julia Wubenhorst, Tara Williams, Allyson Borders, and Joe Page.
b. Procedure for Reappointment - Board of Ethics
c. Routine notice and opportunity for assessed property owners to review proposed contracts
for work related to Otay Valley Road widening before they are let.
23. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Moore
a. Discussion and/or action regarding renaming of Otay Lakes Road (east/west section) due
to near future increase in patientsj visitors, golfers and. educators to new facilities being
constructed in the east. The main access is "L" Street, Telegraph Canyon Road, and Otay
Lakes Road, which are one and the same. It is most appropriate to review this subject
before new street signs are installed and major advertising is printed.
b. Correspondence to Legislature leadership regarding State budget.
Councilman Rindone
c. Update report by Rodriquez Airport Administrator regarding Mexico's Airport Expansion
Plans.
d. South Bay Transportation Coalition Subcommittee Report regarding location of Transit
Center at vicinity of Southwestern Community College.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City vs. County regarding
Appropriate Technologies II.
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. EDCO
and Bay Cities.
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. Otay
Valley Water District.
Acquisition of Shinohara property - Auto Park - pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on July 28,
1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
July 17, 1992
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council /CN
Sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager ~~
/~
City Council Meeting of July 21, 1992
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, July 21, 1992. Comments regarding the Written Communications
are as fo llows:
Sa. This is a letter from the Bonita Business & Professional Association
requesting $3,000 to assist in paying for shuttle bus services throughout
Bonitafest Day, September 26, 1992, as well as services provided by the
Chula Vista Police Department. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE REQUEST BE
REFERRED TO STAFF FOR FURTHER EVALUATION.
Sb. This is a letter from Burton Tiffany Elementary School PTA requesting
waiver of any license requirements for the PTA Craft Fair on November 21,
1992. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS WAIVER OF FEES BE GRANTED AS IS
CONSISTENT WITH PAST PRACTICE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.
SWM:mab
trans
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
-~-
Mceti ng Da Lc _Q.lL2-1I~2
ITEM TITLE
Stlldent Recognitiol)
SUBMITTED BY
International Friendship Commis~ion
(~/5t}lS Vote: )-~S
0__\:_-
}13:-0r \ader to present each of th(:, follohing ~l~udellts from
Irapllato, ~e~:ic() wj_th cc'rtificates of r'pcogniriofl. Tile ~:ttL(j0nt~
[11'(' }J<:lrt of tl-te Sister CitiE.'~~:, IntcrnDtional C.S./Yle~;ico E.el1u~s:;'
YOlltll E~charlge Program.
Jo~_::,;e Luis Cortes
~1;lrl;l (:at:alirla ~Jata
\-ictor Gr-:r'c ia.
Vie to r '101 i n;'t
\Ial'i~l 1~l,ge]1ia O]~tiz
'Ia ., /
COtlKCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM .!Jiz..
MEETING DATE 7/21/92
ITEM ~ITLB: Proclamation - Proclaiming the Month of July 1992 as
"PARKS & RECREATION MONTH"
SUBMITTED BY:
Mayor Na~
(4/STRS VOTE: YES_ NO xxx
Historically agencies throughout California have recognized July as
"PARKS & RECREATION MONTH" to bring an increased awareness of the
value of recreational opportunities to all residents of the community.
The proclamation declaring the month of July 1992 as "PARKS & RECREATION
MONTH" will be presented by Mayor Tim Nader to Robert Lind, Chairman of
the Chula Vista Parks & Recreation Commission.
'Ib - /
"
_._:~:"-'"';'(;c_~~
~~ <..oe::.
'irrrfIJJ--; lL / ()eP-U1Pj--
J) i, ;) i-C4'c-/~
If [,LiLb<.- 1<1 L~
(!U-IrJ-fi? [I--rn 0"01/7 cut ,
mict,U. AY"--if - ...f-i!.. , cf.-<tl,J....
(U' CUA/).H--., '-.ll.~ r--H- ,~.
Coordinator ~
'(J-.?
nOllI
July 23, 1992
Athena Bradley, Conservation
Carole French~~countant
DATIl!
'1'01
SUBJECT I
APPROPRIATING RESOLUTION 16711, R.A.D. PROJECT
I have set up the $25,350 budget in Dept/Actv 270-2705 for the
Household Hazardous Waste grant. According to the resolution, the
reimbursable amount is $25,050, with $300 being funded by the Waste
Management Trust Fund.
The uncertified copy of the resolution that I have states that the
$25,050 is being appropriated from the "General Fund". I believe
this is in error. The general fund is providing the "soft match"
funds which are already part of the general fund operating budget.
The $25,050 is being appropriated directly in the Waste Management
Trust fund. The reimbursements from the State of California should be
deposited to the Waste Management Trust fund revenue account 270-3661,
"state Grants".
Please call me
concerning the
resolution needs
to the Mayor for
at X3173 if you have any questions or problems
accounting for this grant. The wording of the
to be changed prior to the certified copy being sent
signature.
cc: Lyman Christopher
Gina Chammas
Accounts Payable
stephanie Snyder
.
RESOLUTION NO. 16711
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AMENDING FY 1992-1993 BUDGET TO ADD A TEMPORARY,
PART-TIME POSITION IN UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE IN THE WASTE
MANAGEMENT PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR SUCH
PROGRAM AND POSITION
WHEREAS, 1 ast February, staff developed a proposal for a Household
Hazardous Waste Reduct ion, A lternat i ves, and Di sposa 1 Educat i ona 1 Awareness
Project; Council authorized a $47,826 application to be submitted to the State
of California, Integrated Waste Management Board and authorized the City Manager
to execute the contract when and if received.
WHEREAS, the City has now been notified of a $25,050 award, with only 14
app 1 i cants recei vi ng awards for a total of $338,829, out of 54 app 1 i cat ions
requesting over $3.5 million in funding.
WHEREAS, the RAD Project will involve targeting classrooms (K-Middle and
Juni or Hi gh) for household hazardous waste curri cu 1 a usage, conducting hi gh
school and adult presentations, a sticker campaign for young children, mobil
educational display unit, distributing consumer awareness materials, and small
business hazardous materials awareness outreach.
WHEREAS, a portion of the grant funds, $7695, will be utilized to fund the
salary, benefits and mileage reimbursement of an intern to work with the City's
Conservation Coordinator to implement the Project.
WHEREAS, an addit i ona 1 amount of $10,728 of the grant funds wi 11 be
utilized to subcontract with the County's Household Hazardous Materials Program
educat i ona 1 contract holder to provi de class room presentat ions, teacher i n-
service trainings and corresponding curricula, presentations to adults (both in
English and in Spanish) and printed materials.
WHEREAS, grant funds amounting to $1,226 have also been awarded to purchase
a mobile educational display unit that will provide pictures, samples and
information on household hazardous waste to be set-up in public areas and
additional grant funds of $5,701 will allow the purchase of educational stickers
for young children and consumer awareness guides (English and Spanish).
WHEREAS, the total cost of the RAD Project is $33,383 and the City's "hard
match" for the Project is $300 and an additional $5,413, as "soft match" for the
grant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chula Vista does hereby
amend the FY 1992-93 budget to add a temporary, part-time position in the
Unclassified Service in the Environmental Management Unit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $25,050 is hereby appropriated from
the unappropriated balance of the CeReral~fund and $300 appropriated from the
ilJ;.Q.C'di? t-,,~
..
Resolution No. 16711
Page 2'
oc.
Waste Ha"agen,eht-irust Fund and transferred into the fo 11 owi n9 accounts:
$ 7,090 into Account 270-2705-5105
$ 104 into Account 270-2705-5143
$ 266 into Account 270-2705-5145
$ 235 into Account 270-2705-5225
$10,578 into Account 270-2705-5201
$ 636 into Account 270-2705-5212
$ 1,226 into Account 270-2705-5568
$ 5,175 into Account 270-2705-5331
$ 40 into Account 270-2705-5218
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Athena Bradley
Conservation Coordinator
Bruce H. Boogaard
City Attorney
..
Resolution No. 16711
Page 1
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chul a
Vista, California, this 21st day of July, 1992, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Grasser Horton, Malcolm, Moore,
Rindone, Nader
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO )
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoi ng Reso 1 ut i on No. 16711 was dul y passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 21st day of July, 1992.
Executed this 21st day of July, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
1
...
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item.2.1 ~...~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: Consideration of EastLake -I General
Development Plan Amendment, EastLake I SPA Plan Amendment,
EastLake I Activity Center Precise Plan Guidelines, EastLake I
Public Facil ities Finance Plan, EastLake I Planned Conmunity
District Regulations Amendment, EastLake I Activity Center Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake I Activity Center Water
Conservation Plan, Kaiser Medical Center Precise Plan, Kaiser
Medical Center Conditional Uses Permit, and Kaiser Development
Agreement; EastLake Development Company and Kaiser Permanente
Resolution lb(o~ Approving the EastLake I General
Deve 1 opment Plan, EastLake I SPA Plan Amendment, EastLake I
Activity Center Precise Plan Guidelines, EastLake I Public
Facilities Finance Plan, EastLake I Activity Center Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake I Activity Center Water
Conservation Plan, Kaiser Medical Center Precise Plan, Kaiser
Medical Center Conditional Use Permit, CEQA Findings,
Mitigation M~~ing Program and Statement of Overriding
Consideratio~~b~ EastLake I/Kaiser Project
~~ .
Ord i na~~ S:z. ~ Adopt i ng an amendment to the EastLake I
PlaR~dr Community District Regulations and approving the
Katier Development Agreement
~(\r ~~//
SUBMITTED ~ Director of Planning ~~
REVIEWEtp~~: City Manager~4 ~b~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
The applicants, EastLake Development Company and Kaiser Permanente, have
submitted the above referenced plans and application for the Kaiser Medical
Center Project, located north of Otay Lakes Road between EastLake Parkway and
future SR-12S.
The property is located within the Eastlake I Village Center and was planned
in 1985 as part of the first phase of the 3,000! acre Eastlake development.
Copies of the draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report 92-01 were
previously forwarded to the Council. Included in this report are the DRC
staff report, RCC recommendations, Planning Commission staff report, and the
various plans and applications referenced in the Item Title.
A Community Forum was held at Eastlake Elementary School on May 26. 1992. to
familiarize area property owners and residents with the Kaiser project.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Adopt a reso 1 ut ion approvi ng the General Development Pl an amendment, SPA
Plan amendment, Public Facilities Finance Plan, Water Conservation Plan,
Air Quality Improvement Plan, Eastlake Activity Center Precise Plan
Guidelines, Conditional Use Permit, Precise Plan, CEQA Findings,
Mitigation Monitoring Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations;
~\ -,
Page 2, Item d.} a -I- <!...-
Meeting Date 6/30/92
2. Adopt an ordinance approving the Planned Community District Regulations
Amendment, and the Kaiser Development Agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On May 18, 1992, the Resource
Conservation Commission reviewed the Supplemental EIR, Air Quality Improvement
Plan and the Water Conservation Plan and recommended approval with the request
that the City establish guidelines for the preparation of Air Quality
Improvement Plans and Water Conservation Plans for future projects.
On June 24, 1992, the Planning Commission recommended by a vote of 6-0
(Tuchscher absent) approval of the EastLake I/Kaiser project. The Planning
Commission resolutions and meeting minutes are attached. Other
recommendations by the Commission included:
1. Adding language to the Development Agreement to encourage
Kaiser to work with local educational institutions to establish
and promote health care job training and education programs.
2. Minor wording change to Mitigation Measure 4.3.4.5 to clarify
the requirement for an access road from Otay Lakes Road north
to Fenton Street extension at the time of issuance of a
building permit for Phase III of the Kaiser Medical Center.
On June 8, 1992, the Design Review Committee recommended approval of the
Kaiser Medical Center Precise Plan by a vote of 4-0.
DISCUSSION:
1.0 Historv
The 1982 EastLake I General Development Plan (GDP) was originally
adopted as the City's General Plan for the EastLake I project area.
In 1985, the GDP was amended to reflect the preparation and approval
of the EastLake I SPA Pl an. The General Plan Update, adopted in
July 1989, incorporated the previous Council approvals of EastLake I
GDP and SPA Plan into the City's General Plan.
The Salt Creek I project which was approved on September 12, 1989,
constituted the last amendment to the EastLake I GDP and SPA Plan by
changing a 130-acre area originally planned for industrial to
residential. This area is currently under development.
The currently adopted EastLake I SPA Plan designates 71.8 acres in
the southwest portion of the plan area for Village Center
development. The SPA Plan states that the Village Center will
contain shopping, restaurants, offices, high density residential,
lakes, open space and civic uses. The Village Center was to be
divided into two areas. The area identified as VC-l on the adopted
SPA Plan, located immediately to the north of Otay Lakes Road and
west of EastLake Parkway, includes 59.8 acres, while VC-2, located
~l-'-
Page 3, Item;:;'] ,;....C
Meeting Date 6/30/92
to the north of Otay Lakes Road and east of EastLake Parkway,
includes 12.0 acres. In order to accommodate the Kaiser Permanente
Chu1a Vista Medical Center proposal, the applicants are proposing an
amendment to the adopted EastLake I SPA Plan to modify the types of
uses permitted 1n the Activity Center, or former Village Center,
portion of the adopted SPA. Specifically, the area currently
designated as Village Center (VC-I) would be divided to include 30.6
acres of MC-l, Medical Center use, 17.3 acres of VC-l, village
center use, and 11.9 acres of open space/public facility. The
approved 12.0-acre VC-2 area would be reduced to 10 acres and would
include 6.0 acres of office/commercial VC-2 use and 4.0 acres of
community purpose facil ity use, such as church use. The two acres
of 1 and, located at the southeast intersect i on of EastLake Parkway
and Fenton Street, is proposed to be redesignated for employment use
(E-I0) and would be moved from the Activity Center to the Business
Center portion of the SPA Plan. In addition to these changes, the
proposal would eliminate all residential use from the Activity
Center. A breakdown of the currently approved and proposed uses and
the corresponding acreage is provided in the following table and is
shown on Exhibit 6.
Table 1
EastLake I Activity Center Land Use Statistics
Land Use
Retail/Commercial
Office/Commercial
Residential
Open Space/Public Facility
Medical Center
Employment
Community Purpose Facility District
Totals
Current1v AODroved
22.2 ac
12.0 ac
18.0 ac (405 du's)
19.6 ac
N/A
N/A
N/A
71.8 ac
ProDosed
17.3 ac
6.0 ac
0.0 ac
11.9 ac
30.6 ac.
2.0 ac.
4.0 ac.
71.8 ac
Vi11aae Center ConceDt
The EastLake Master Plan contains two Vil1 age Centers within the
3,200 acre community. These Village Centers were to be located
within an "activity spine" in close proximity to a major
transportation corridor. Along these transportation corridors would
be the two Village Centers plus employment center, community park,
school facil ities and institutional uses. Each of the residential
neighborhoods would have vehicular and pedestrian access to a
V ill age Center.
The Kaiser Medical Center is proposed to be located within the first
Vil1 age Center between future SR-125, Otay Lakes Road and EastLake
Parkway. Originally, this Village Center was planned as a place
where local needs of the individual residential neighborhoods would
~\-3
Page 4, Item~' ~....~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
be met. The Village Center was located at the north end of the
activity corridor near the hub of the transportation system, i.e.,
Otay Lakes Road and SR-125. This location is in close proximity to
the Business Park and the individual residential neighborhoods
(Hills, Shores and Greens). The mix of uses was to be a combination
of apartments, senior citizen housing, retail, civic and visitor
serving commercial with water features, library, transit center,
trails and other amenities. Most of the uses were planned to be low
scale and oriented toward serving EastLake residents and the
surrounding area.
The Kaiser Medical Center, with 6 to 9 story buildings and
multi-level parking structures, represents a major change to the
original concept of the Village Center plan. As the Kaiser project
evolved, it became obvious that the Kaiser Medical Center would not
work with the small scale Village Center concept without major
revisions.
As a result of this realization, the Village Center was re-designed
to be compatible with the Kaiser project. The residential uses were
removed and a mix of specialty shopping, entertainment, restaurant,
auto center, offices, and other uses were selected as being more
supportive of a regional medical office center. These uses have
been arranged to work with the design and scale of the Kaiser
Medical Center as well as being supportive of EastLake resident's
need s .
The new plan for the Village Center described above is not without
certain tradeoffs. The design and functioning of the Village Center
becomes more cri t lea 1 when the uses become more i ntens i ve.
Accordingly, the requirement for precise plan approval of each use
within the Village Center will be required.
2.0 EastLake II (EastLake I EXDansionl General DeveloDment Plan
Amendment (Exhibit 41
The proposed amendment to the EastLake General Development Plan
consists of certain minor text amendments and a change to the
General Development Plan map to change the designation of the Kaiser
Medical Center site (30.6 acres) from Retail-Commercial to
Public/Quasi-Public, and to change 2.0 acres at the southeast corner
of Fenton and EastLake Parkway from Professional & Administrative to
Research and limited Manufacturing, to move the candidate church
site from the west side of EastLake Parkway to the east side, and to
redesignate the remainder of the Retail-Commercial south of the
Kaiser Medical Center from High Residential Retail-Commercial to
Retail Commercial.
~l-4
Page 5, Item c;1\ Y6+C,o
Meeting Date 6/30/92
All of the above changes to the General Development Plan are the
result of the replanning of the Village Center. Essentially, the
principal change starts with the prosed Kaiser Medical Center and
continues through the remaining portions of the 71.8 acre Village
Center to reflect uses that will be compatible with and
complementary to the Medical Center.
3.0 Eastlake I SPA Plan Amendment (Exhibit 51
The proposed amendment to the Eastlake I SPA Plan consists of
substantial additions to the text to describe the new design concept
for the revi sed Vi 11 age Center and changes to the SPA Plan map to
reflect the Kaiser Medical Center.
In addition to the Kaiser Medical Center, the remaining portions of
the Eastlake Village Center will include retail commercial, hotel,
church and daycare, restaurants, offi ce uses, pub li c 1 i brary and a
transit center.
The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report identifies an
impact arising from the movement of 405 units of rental housing out
of the Village Center. The units are being removed but discussions
are underway with Eastlake Development Company to relocate these
units within the remaining Eastlake ownership. Rental units are
important in helping the City meet its affordable housing goals.
4.0 Eastlake I Activitv Center Precise Plan Guidelines (Exhibit 61
The Eastlake Activity Center (71.8 acres) is comprised of three
areas. The site north of Otay lakes Road and south of Ka i ser
Medical Center is 29.2 acres. The Kaiser Medical Center is 30.6
acres. The site east of Eastlake Parkway is 10 acres, plus a 2.0
acre employment park area.
In 1985, the Eastlake I SPA Plan was approved with provisions for
the preparation of a precise plan for the Village Center (EastLake
Activity Center described above) prior to any building
construction. The idea in 1985 was that when the time came to begin
constructing the Village Center, a precise plan would be prepared to
guide the site planning and architectural design of the various land
uses.
The applicant began discussions on the Precise Plan with City staff
in July 1991. The design evolved from early ideas about traditional
"main street" design to the modified concept reflected in the
present proposal. The "axial" concept finally settled on seemed to
tie the site together functionally as well as providing pedestrian
connections with the uses to the east and south.
~\ ..C;
Page 6, Item d-.\ 10 ~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
The Conceptual Master plan included in the Guidelines illustrates
the kinds of uses that could work well together and be compatible
with the Kaiser Medical Center. The Conceptual Master Plan does not
restrict the developer to specific uses. The uses are simply
"typical" uses that would serve the Eastlake community and work well
with the overall Village Center concept.
For example, the west site might contain a theater, medical center,
offices, special ity retail, restaurants, auto center, and 1 i brary.
The east side might contain a health club, church, daycare center,
offices and a hotel.
The major theme is to create an urban village by having animation
and interest in the buildings and the landscape features. The
library could be a key civic element and has been located in a
prominent location in close proximity to the water features which
will be a dominant landscape element in the design of the site.
The des i gn channe 1 s the pedestrian toward intersect ions at
Fenton/EastLake Parkway and Otay lakes Road/EastLake Parkway which
are safe crossing locations. A i>edestrian bridge will be located
across Otay lakes Road, west of Eastlake Parkway, to facilitate the
pedestrian linkage from Eastlake Greens to the Activity Center. The
timing of construction of the pedestrian bridge will depend upon the
traffic volume on Otay lakes Road.
This description of the "end state" of the Village Center
deve 1 opment is represented by the Conceptual Master Plan contained
within the Eastlake I Activity Center Precise Plan Guidelines. The
Conceptual Master Plan plan, coupled with the criteria contained in
the Guidelines, is intended to guide future individual precise plan
submittals within the area.
As each precise plan is approved, the Conceptual Master Plan will be
updated and, therefore, kept current at all times. As future
precise plan proposals are presented, staff will determine whether
there is substantial conformity of design, improvements,
landscaping, and grading of the proposed use with the Conceptual
Master Plan. If staff determines that the proposed use does not
substantially conform to the Guidelines, then the proposed use would
require an amendment by the City Council.
The Conceptual Master Plan is divided into phases to show the
minimum amount of area required to be precise planned with each
phase. This is necessary to avoid discontinuity in the physical
development of the site. Certain common amenities such as public
improvements, landscaping, off-street parking, access, lighting and
signage need to be included in each phase together with individual
uses.
~l-~
Page 7, Item 0\ \ to+ ~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
5.0 Public Facilities Finance Plan Uodate (Exhibit 7)
The original Eastlake I Publ ic Facilities Finance Plan was adopted
by the City Council on February 19, 1985. The proposed Eastlake I
SPA Pl an amendment requi res an update to the adopted Eastlake I
Public Facilities Finance Plan.
This update consists of two tasks: (1) an update of the plan to
reflect changes since 1985, and (2) to identify additional public
facilities needed by the Kaiser amendment, if any.
The major change to the SPA Pl an since 1985 consists of the Salt
Creek I amendment which changed approximately 130 acres from
Business Park to residential. The Salt Creek I project consists of
550 dwelling units and is under construction.
The additional publ ic facil ities needed by the proposed amendment
consist primarily of traffic related facilities. Other public
facil ities are adequate or will be provided by the appl icant prior
to the issuance of building permits or at appropriate future times
in accordance with the phased construction of the Eastlake Activity
Center.
5.1 Traffic Facilities
The traffic facilities required to meet the new demand created by
the Kaiser Medical Center are based upon a trip generation rate of
26 ADT per 1,000 square feet of floor area.
A total of 49,440 ADT would be generated by the proposed SPA Plan
amendment which includes the Medical Center plus the Village
Center. Of this total, 34,710 ADT would be produced by the medical
center. Phase I and II of the Medical Center would generate 20,670
ADT while Phase III would generate 14,040.
In comparing the Eastlake I SPA total trips to adopted plans, there
are two critical comparisons. The first is comparing the total
traffic generated by the entire Eastlake I SPA Plan including the
Medical Center (65,794) to the total traffic assumed in the General
Plan (43,750). The second is comparing the total traffic generated
by the Eastlake I SPA with only Phase I and II of the Medical Center
(51,174) to the total traffic assumed in the Transportation Phasing
Plan (34,116). This latter comparison is the more important of the
two. It indicates that the Eastlake I SPA Plan with Phases I and II
of the Medical Center would generate an estimated 17,638 more ADT's
than was allocated to the site in the Transportation Phasing Plan.
These extra trips can be accommodated by planned improvements to the
street system prior to SR-125 construction together with offsetting
reductions from Eastlake's "Approved Projects" identified in the
City's Transportation Phasing Plan or the trips generated by the
Medical Center are less than anticipated in the traffic analysis.
~l-l
Page 8, Item ~ \ .o""~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
The traffic analysis shows that all intersections would continue to
operate within the City's level of service standards with the
additional traffic during the interim (pre-SR 125) condition,
however, the buildout situation would not meet level of service
standards without additional street facilities. The mitigation
measures recommended by the traffic report will properly condition
the development to meet the traffic threshold standards.
6.0 Air Oualitv Imorovement Proaram (Exhibit 9)
The City's Growth Management Ordinance requires that projects
invol ving a SPA Plan amendment prepare an Air Qual ity Improvement
Plan. This plan is intended to focus attention on those programs
which can be implemented with the proposed project to reduce air
pollutants.
The air qual ity problem in San Diego is primarily ozone. Ozone
levels are exceeding State and Federal standards. Ozone is the
result of the chemical reaction of hydrocarbons and nitrogen oxide
in the presence of bright sunl ight. In 1988, San Diego County
exceeded the Federal standard on 45 days (.12 ppm) and the State
standards on 160 days (.09 ppm).
Accordingly, the Kaiser organization has prepared a transportation
demand management program ~for this project. This program will
concentrate efforts on reducing automobile emissions by encouraging
employees to carpool, vanpool, use public transportation, bicycle or
walk to work which will in turn reduce air pollutants.
In addition, the Village Center site will incorporate a transit
center facil ity, approved by the City Transit Coordinator, and 120
spaces of shared parking for park and ride purposes will be provided
(see Public Facilities Finance Plan).
7.0 Water Conservation Plan (Exhibit 10)
The Growth Management Program also requires the preparation of a
Water Conservat i on Pl an for major projects. The plan prepared for
the project proposes various on-site measures to conserve water
usage such as ultra-low flow toilets and shower heads, faucet
aerators, hot water pipe insulations and special hospital equipment.
In addition, the plan proposes to implement outdoor/landscaping
conservat i on measures which incl ude efficient i rrigat ion systems,
moisture sensors, low water use landscaping, installation of
reclaimed water lines and water conserving practices during grading
and construction.
Off-site measures require the applicant to comply with any future
water offset poliCY adopted by the San Diego County Water Authority,
local water districts or the City of Chula Vista.
d.-\ ~ B'
Page 9, Item d \ ~~~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
The net result of the proposed amendment with respect to water usage
is an increase of .16 MGO with the proposed water conservation
measures. These measures will be incorporated into the CUP
conditions of approval as well as the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
8.0 Conditional Use Permit (Exhibit III
The proposed medical office center involves the northerly 30.6 acres
of the EastLake I Village Center. At full bui1dout, the Medical
Center will contain 439 hospital beds (785,000 square feet of floor
area), 485,000 square feet of medical and administrative offices, a
35,000 square foot central plant, three parking structures to
accommodate 4,271 cars, and surface parking for an additional 148
cars.
8.1 Adiacent Zonina and land Use
North - PC - Eastlake I Employment Park - Business Park
South - PC - Eastlake I Village Center - Vacant
East - PC - Eastlake I Employment Park - Business Park
West - PC - SR 125 and SDG&E easement - vacant/utilities
8.2 Existina Site Characteristics
The 30.6 acre site is relatively flat and currently vacant. The
site has been rough graded and all abutting streets and util ities
are installed. The community trail connecting Eastlake Hills and
Shores to the Village Center is located along the west side of
Eastlake Parkway. Eastlake Parkway is a 4-1ane road with a
landscaped median which provides access to the Village Center.
8.3 ProDosed Use
The medical center would be constructed in three phases. Phase I
would be devoted to the construction of a medical office building,
parking structure, and central plant. Construction is proposed to
begin in 1993, with completion of the first phase by 1995. Phase 2
would begin approximately one year after the start of Phase I and is
expected to be completed by 1997. Phase 2 would consist of the
first of two hospital wings and a parking structure. The third
phase of the project would only be constructed when membership
growth is sufficient to warrant the provision of the second hospital
wing expansion of the medical office building and parking structure.
The medical office building (Phase I) is six stories with a
penthouse and the hospital towers (Phases II & III) are seven
stories with a penthouse. The ~xpanded medical office building
(Phase III) would be nine levels.
~l-~
8.4
Page 10, Item a.l~...L
Meeting Date 6/30/92
The parking structure would be constructed in three phases along the
western project boundary and would range in height from five levels
at the southerly end to seven levels at the northerly end.
Loading and unloading is located between the hospital and the
parking structure. The loading areas are screened from the north
and south ends, while permitting through access only to fire
protection/emergency vehicles.
Vehicular circulation is controlled by an on-site loop road
connecting EastLake Parkway to Fenton Street (extended). Vehicle
entrance to the site is assigned primarily to one or more user
groups as follows:
Northeast entrance - Service, maintenance, employee, staff
doctors, and ambulance.
Southeast entrance - General public, drop-off patient, walk-in
emergency
Southwest entrance - Patient and visitor
Located between the medical office buildings and the hospital is a
publ i c courtyard at multi pl e 1 evels. Stairways, 1 andscapi ng, water
features, and outdoor dining are intended to make the courtyard the
main public meeting place within the complex. The diagnostic and
treatment portion of the hospital is 3 stories tall and is located
along the north side of the courtyard.
Reason for Location of Kaiser Medical Center at EastLake
Kai ser Permanente has projected a need for a new medical office
center to serve their South Bay membership. The timeframe for
planning and constructing a facility of this type is typically seven
years. The current membership in the South Bay is approximately
100,000, which is enough members to support the proposed facility
today.
Kaiser has evaluated its needs and found that its existing main
hospital facility (the Zion facility) has a service capacity of
approximately 300,000-350,000 members with a current demand of
393,000 which will grow to 500,000 by 1998. The Chula Vista
facility will reduce the overcrowding at the Zion facility and
provide more convenient medical service to Chula Vista residents and
employers.
Kaiser has evaluated over 40 site~ in the South Bay over the past
10-15 years. These investigations were narrowed down to five sites
- all of which are within or near the City of Chula Vista. These
sites included locations on Baldwin's property north of Telegraph
~\-Ir)
Page 11, Item a.. \ ~+<!J
Meeting Date 6/30/92
Canyon Road, south of Telegraph Canyon Road, Rancho Del Rey, an
EastLake IV site near future Orange Avenue, and the EastLake I
site. Each of the fi ve sites was evaluated for med i ca 1 center
sUitability and expected time required to process the necessary
permits. Three of the sites were in the unincorporated area and not
planned or zoned for urban development. The remaining two sites
were in the City of Chula Vista and planned for urban development.
The Rancho Del Rey SPA III site which is north of Telegraph Canyon
Road was designated for a school and park site and surrounded on
three sites by res i dent i a 1 development. The EastLake I site was
designated for commercial/office development and was selected as the
preferred site in accordance with Kaiser's site selection criteria.
8.5 Circulation
The main entrances to the medical center would be from the extension
of Fenton Street and opposite Miller Drive from EastLake Parkway.
Regi ona 1 access to the property would eventually be provided by
SR-125 as well as Otay Lakes Road. A full interchange is proposed
at Otay Lakes Road. In addition, a half-diamond interchange at
EastLake Parkway/SR-125 would facilitate access and relieve
congestion at SR-125 and Otay Lakes Road. This half-diamond
interchange is not currently pl anned as part of SR-125 and must
receive approval from CalTrans before it could be constructed.
All intersections would operate at acceptable levels of service with
the project (exclusive of Phase III) with planned TPP improvements
during the pre-125 condition. The pre-125 mitigation measures
include widening Telegraph Canyon Road to 6 lanes plus widening East
"H" Street to 8 lanes from I-80S to Hidden Vista Drive. Also, an
access road from Otay Lakes Road up to Fenton Street (extended),
will be constructed. EastLake Parkway will be widened to six lanes
between Otay Lakes Road and Fenton Street. Otay Lakes Road will be
widened to 8 lanes between SR-125 and EastLake Parkway.
8.6 Land Use/Comoatibilitv
The pri mary goal of the proposed project is to construct a new
Kaiser Permanente Medical Office Center on the 30.6 acre site to
serve Chula Vista and other South Bay Kaiser members who are
currently going to the Zion facility in San Diego to receive medical
care.
The Kaiser facH ity is clearly a regional medical office/hospital
center. It is located within the Activity Corridor which will be
served by the future SR-125 transportation corridor. This Activity
Center is part of the larger EastLake master plan concept which
includes a number of more intensive land uses such as commercial,
high school, churches, community park, higher density residential,
~1...ll
Page 12, Item a...\ ~~Q..
Meeting Date 6/30/92
etc. located between SR-125 corridor and EastLake Parkway. Thi s
location for a regional medical office/hospital center is-compatible
with the overall EastLake master plan.
9.0 Precise Plan - Kaiser Medical Center (Exhibit 12)
The initial design of the Kaiser Precise Plan was reviewed by the
Design Review Committee on April 27. The expressed concerns about
the project architecture and site design focused on:
Length and massing of the proposed parking structure,
especially along the westerly building facade.
Proposed setbacks for the hospital and medical office building
structure, spec i fi ca 11 y Phase II I nurs i ng tower and Phase II I
medical office building expansion.
Medical office building overall "monolithic" form.
Spatial and architectural relationships between the medical
office building and the southern portion of the Activity Center.
Central Plant area screening.
Design and screening of the courtyard area between the medical
office building and hospital loading areas.
Color palette and use of materials on buildings and common
space areas.
Processing and timing of Phase III.
On May IS, 1992, the project architect presented a number of
schematic design solutions and modifications to address the concerns
raised by the DRC on April 27, 1992.
The proposed modifications included:
a. Reduction of Phase II parking segment from 7 levels to 6 levels.
b. Reduction of the southern portion of Phase III parking
structure from 9 levels to 6 levels.
c. Reduction of the northern portion of Phase III parking
structure increment from 9 levels to 7 levels and horizontal
staggering of upper parking levels along EastLake Parkway.
d. Horizontal staggering of Phase III Medical Office Building mass.
~\ "1.2-
Page 13, Item~\~~~
Meeting Date 6/30/92
The Design Review Committee reviewed the revised design of the
Kaiser Medical Center on June 8, 1992. The DRC recommended approval
with conditions necessary to ensure that the project is functionally
and aesthetically balanced and properly designed.
A large scale model of the medical center has been prepared by the
applicant to demonstrate the site and building relationships. This
model will be available at the public hearing and will be used to
discuss the principal features of the project's design.
10.0 Develooment Aareement (Exhibit 13l
The attached Development Agreement between Kaiser Permanente and the
City of Chul a Vi sta represents an agreement to vest the vari ous
permits in return for certain extraordinary benefits to the City of
Chu1a Vista. These benefits constitute additional opportunities for
mutua 1 cooperat i on between Kaiser and the City. The general terms
of this agreement are described in the attached memorandum from John
Goss, dated June 10, 1992 (Exhibit ~).
11.0 Conclusion
The combined processing and public hearing for the various plans and
permits included in this project is unique. Normally, the planning
amendments would be separated from the zoning and design permits.
By combining both permits into a single process, the time required
to process this project was reduced by over 50%.
The attached resolutions which contain the conditions of approval
include all of the EIR Mitigation Measures contained in the
Environmental Impact Report.
FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact of the Kaiser Medical Center is included
in Appendix I of the Technical Appendices to the Eastlake I SPA Plan
Amendment/Kaiser Environmental Impact Report. The Eastlake Activity Center's
annual impact after buildout is projected to be a positive $263,009 per year
in current 1992 dollars.
WPC 0340p
~I-l~
Il.
THE CIT. JF CHUL4 VISTA PAR7Y DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
St:ll.:ment of disclosure of cc:rtain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all mattcrs
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract. i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
Unknown
"'
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
N/A
~
.'.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
N/A
4.
H:1VC: you had morc: than S250 worth of business transacted with any membc:r of the City staP'
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
i'\o XX If yes. pkasc: indicate person(s):
"
Pkase identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assignt:d III reprc:selll you before the City in this matter.
HMC Architects, .'
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggreg:lle, contrihuted more than S !.OOl) to a
Cllul1cilmemhcr in th.: current or preceding eJection period? Yes _ No XX If yes, stat.: whieh
Councilmemh.:r(s):
P,,'f", 'n is defined :ts: -AllY illdi";{/iwl. firm, (o-p"rtlJe'rsJul', joi"t "{'IIII11"(', tis.rocicl/ioll, sodal club. frat('nUlI (1/:~nllizfl1im'. ('0'1'1"(1(;(""
('.'/tllt', Im.u. ''t'fein'" .\rlll/iCmt', Il1i.\" (/lId tllIY OI11e'r COWl/Yo CilY flllil '()",m,~ city. mlllliciJ'dli~\~ ,1i.uricl or milt'" J'oli/kill Ju/llfili''''OJl.
4 "r ,:IIY OIlIer group or comhmmion llcling il.f " 'mil." ,
KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
D::l.::
I;\OTE: AlIa,1I :,dditinnall'aJ!cs as nCl'c":"~\')
~k :; I \'1tt2.
By:
'. \ ;):'(,I.(lSI.":'~ I'!
CAA'2.\.E~ \'-AMI""~"-\
", ill! Ilr typ.' lIam~ or 1'()l!tr:'l'tor::q'i'Ii,'::11l
: ;< ,"\ .. t., 1 !, . . .." I~
dl-1i
(9
BONITA BUSINESS
& PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Founders and Sponsors of the Bonitafest
June 25, 1992
Honorable Mayor Tim Nader and
City Council Members
City of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Honorable Mayor and Council Members;
On behalf of the Bonita Business and Professional Association,
Founders and Sponsors of the annual Bonitafest, and the Bonitafest
Committee, I am writing this letter of request for assistance and
support from the City of Chula vista.
Th~ Bonitafest Committee is asking you to please consider our
request for the sum of three-thousand dollars ($3,000). This is
the amount required to assist in paying for Shuttle Bus services
throughout Bnnitafest Day, as well as services provided by the City
of Chula vista Police to promote our community event.
This request is minimal compared to the eighteen-thousand
($18,000) assisting the Harbor Days event. I would like to further
remind you, that along Bonita Road, all of the businesses are in
Chula Vista, and are taxed accordingly. This monetary assistance
will go back into the city of Chula vista for your services.
Thanking you in advance for your consideration for our 20th
An~t.;.al ':\'iild (';8S-\..." Bonitafe~i.:. which will be neld on saturday,
September 26th. You are invited to attend this wonderful event for
the community. If I can be of any assistance or answer any
questions regarding the above request, don't hesitate to call me.
sincerely,
4ir:h"~
?M'r~~ite Maniscalco,
Bonitafest Chairwoman
CC: T. Pat Cavanaugh,
President
B.B.P.A.
NM:pd
W~ITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
+'
'::',1 '':' i
o '~~'" ;'\~'c c.c,
'\,:..~,,:,<--,
~>),\"
,
\',
POST ,O~ICE BOX 284~BONITA~LIFORNIA 92002 (619) 425-5355
~ /f{/~<?-c ..5 Q: - /
RECElVEOBURTON C. TIFFANY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL fYI'A
1691 Elmhurst Street
Chula Vista, CA 91913
CI'j"V.. ..... 'C'.."A
I .'..... . .;j,
erTY CL.i.,-, ~y'riCE
July 8, 1992
<...~.
" ','l:.
Ij<\\
, ~,
\\
.92 ..u.-9
:~no :5i
f'. 9
City Clerk
Chula Vista City Council
P. O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 91912
ATTN: Mayor and City Council:
For the eighth year, Tiffany Pl'A is hosting a craft fair to be held November 21,
1992, at the gymnasium at Bonita Vista High School, from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
Handicrafters from San Diego County have been invited to participate in this fair.
I request that the City Council waive any license requirements for the holding of
this fair, inasmuch as all proceeds will go into a general fund to be used by Tiffany
PI' A on service projects and other programs to benefit the children of our school,
and the entire school community.
Thank you for presenting this on our behalf.
Sincerely,
'-/YLQAJJ..{jln ~k{l./v-;r,
Marilee Castenholz McKelvey ,
Craft Fair Chair
421-6980
Please send any correspondence to Marilee at 1615 Gotham Street, Chula Vista,
CA 91913. Thank you.
,
c/,~ WRITTEN COMMUNICA TIO~\:? ~ .,
~ ~L") , 7);./?~
Vi-. :;~W~ '-1 /
j);., * U~ o/t(~ -.JD-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 07/21/92
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution
California
Establish
Project.
Resolution I~ 7/1 Amending FY 1992-1993
Budget to Include the Household Hazardous Waste
Educa tion Pro j ect and add a Temporary, Part-time
Position in Unclassified Service in the
Environmental Management Unit and Appropriating
Funds Therefor.
I~ 7/t)
Household
a Household
Accepting a State of
Hazardous Waste Grant to
Hazardous Waste Education
SUBMITTED BY: Conservation Coordi-natortkB
REVIEWED BY: City ManagerJb b~~) (4/5ths Vote: Yes-1LNo_)
BACKGROUND: Last February, staff developed a proposal for a
Household Hazardous Waste Reduction, Alternatives, and Disposal
Educational Awareness Project; Council authorized a $47,826
application to be submitted to the State of California, Integrated
Waste Management Board ("Board") and authorized the City Manager to
execute the contract when and if received. The City has now been
notified of a $25,050 award. The grant process was very
competitive, with the Board receiving 54 applications requesting
over $3.5 million in funding. The Board awarded grants to 14
applicants, for a total of $338,829 (Attachment A is a listing of
grant recipients). Accepting the grant obligates the City to hire
an intern to carry out the Project; as described in this report,
the intern will be fully reimbursed by grant funds.
California State Health and Safety Code prohibits the disposal of
hazardous waste at solid waste landfills. The County of San Diego,
in order to enforce the State law is currently conducting load
checks of vehicles entering the landfill; vehicles found to contain
hazardous materials may be fined. Today, hazardous materials can
be found in almost every house and come in many forms, including
household cleaners, automotive products, paints and solvents and
pesticides.
Chula Vistans dispose of an estimated 400 tons of household
hazardous waste each year, most of which ends up at the Otay
Landfill. It is staff's intent to utilize the grant funds to
provide information to Chula Vista residents and school children
about the importance of using alternatives to toxic household
hazardous products when available and to properly dispose of waste
from household hazardous products. Council action is now required
to allow the project to begin.
~-J
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Resource Conservation
Commission will review this report at their July 20th, 1992
meeting. Minutes can be forwarded to Council after the RCC action;
a brief oral report of the RCC member's comments may be given to
Council at this meeting, if requested.
DISCUSSION:
The Household Hazardous Waste Reduction, Alternatives, and Disposal
Educational Awareness Project ("RAD Project") will provide
information and educational materials to school children and adults
in the Chula Vista community. The Project will involve targeting
classrooms (K-Middle and Junior High) for household hazardous waste
curricula usagel, conducting high school and adult presentations,
a sticker campaign for young children, mobil educational display
uni t, distributing consumer awareness materials, and small business
hazardous materials awareness outreach. Attachment B is a detailed
work statement for the Project.
A portion of the grant funds, $7695, will be utilized to fund the
salary, benefits and mileage reimbursement of an intern to work
with the City's Conservation Coordinator to implement the Project.
Additionally, $10,728 of the grant funds will be utilized to
subcontract with the County's Household Hazardous Materials Program
educational contract holder2 to provide classroom presentations,
teacher in-service trainings and corresponding curricula,
presentations to adults (both in English and in Spanish) and
printed materials.
Grant funds amounting to $1,226 have also been awarded to purchase
a mobile educational display unit that will provide pictures,
samples and information on household hazardous waste to be set-up
in public areas. Additional grant funds of $5,701 will allow the
purchase of educational stickers for young children and consumer
awareness guides (English and Spanish).
FISCAL IMPACT: The total cost of the proposed Household Hazardous
Waste Reduction, Alternatives, and Disposal Educational Awareness
Project is $33,383. The City's "hard match" for the Project
includes $215 for design and printing costs, $45 for copying and
$40 for postage. The total amount requested for appropriation is
$25,350. This includes $25,050 for Project activities which will
1 This curricula and other ioformational materials have been developed by the Environmental Health
Coalition (EHC), a local non-profit organization contracted by the County of San Diego to provide regional
educational awareness of hazardous waste.
.
2 At this time, the contract awarded to the Environmental Health Coalition has ended. A competitive bid
process is under way; a new contract will be awarded sometime in early August. The City will then subcontract
with the entity that is awarded the County's HHW educational contract.
2
~''<
be fully reimbursed through the grant. It is proposed that the
additional appropriation of $300 come from the Waste Management
Trust Fund, established by Council to assist with residential solid
waste reduction and recycling.
An additional $5,413, as "soft match" for the grant, will be
provided through the activities of the Conservation Coordinator
($4,540), printing staff ($164) and related support staff ($709)
which is therefore currently appropriated. An in-kind donation of
literature, valued at an estimated $930, and media assistance and
technical consultation, valued at an estimated $1,825, will be
provided by the County of San Diego and its Household Hazardous
Materials Program educational contractor.
3
~~J
ATTACHMENT A
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
RESOLUTION 92-66
APPROVAL OF DISCRETIONARY GRANTS
WHEREAS, Public Resources Code Section 46401 requires the
Board to award-grants to cities, counties, and local agencies with
responsibility for waste management for local programs that help
prevent the disposal of hazardous waste, including household
hazardous waste at solid waste facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Board complied with Public Resources Code Section
46208 by adopting regulations specifying procedures for the issuing
of grants for the Solid Waste Disposal site Cleanup and Maintenance
Account; and
WHEREAS, Board staff solicited applications for Discretionary
Grants from December 2, 1991 through February 28, 1992; and
WHEREAS, 54 applications were received before the February 28,
1992 deadline; and
- WHEREAS, Board staff reviewed the applications to determine
their conformance with the regulations in Title 14, California Code
of Regulations (14 CCR), Division 7, Chapter 7, Articles 1,1.1,2,
and 2.1; and
WHEREAS, Board staff has determined 14 applications are
eligible for grant funding;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Board hereby awards
the following 14 Discretionary Grants in the following amounts:
1. city of Oroville
2. County of Calaveras
3. city of Martinez
4. City of Santa Clarita
5. county of Mono and city of
Mammoth Lakes
6. city of Big Bear Lake
7. city of Chino
8. city of Fontana
9. City of Rialto
10. City of Chula vista
11. County of Tuolumne
12. County of Ventura, Cities of
Simi Valley and Thousand Oaks
13. city of West Sacramento
14. City of Woodland
$57,388
43,500
7,681
25,156
64,100
17,259
21,300
5,956
16,093
25,050
24,766
7,800
21,705
1,075
TOTAL
$338,829
~-r
CERTIFICATION
The pndersigned Executive Director of the California Integrated
Waste Management Board does hereby certify that the foregoing is a
full, true, and correct copy of a resolution duly and regularly
adopted at a meeting of the California Integrated Waste Management
Board held June 24, 1992.
d~ JUN 241992 /}/ .
~z:.~
Ralph E, Chandler
Executive Director
t,-5'
ATTACHMENT B
City of Chula Vista
WORK STATEMENT
The City of Chula Vista will complete the following tasks as related to the project objectives in order to
establish a public education and community awareness campaign to promote household hazardous waste
reduction, alternatives to toxic products, and proper disposal.
OBJECTIVE 1. TO FOSTER AN INCREASED AWARENESS IN SCHOOL
CHll.DREN OF TIlE PROBLEMS CREATED BY TIlE PRESENCE OF HHW IN
TIlE HOME, COMMUNITY AND IN TIlE ENVIRONMENT
Task 1. Employ and Maintain Project Intern
ADesign employment announcement
B.Distribute announcement
C.lnterview prospective employees
D.F ormalize hiring
E.Supervise Intern and monitor accounting for Intern Salary
F.1dentify the person receiving intern position and send to CIWMB Project Manager
Task 2. Establish ongoing relationship with Chula Vista Elementary and
Sweetwater Union High School Board of Education and curricula
administrators for area schools
AMake contacts via telephone
B.Describe Project and available curricula and in.service training, presentations, and literature
C.Meet with interested personnel
D.Begin dialogue for institutionalizing HHW curricula usage in schools on an ongoing basis
Task 3. Verify use of HHW curriculum
AObtain listing of schools/classrooms which have provided in-service training and curricula
B.Contact schools/classrooms listed directly
1. Record information regarding current usage of curricula
Task 4. Create synopsis of curricula usage
ACompile curricula usages into document
1. Send copy of document to CIWMB project manager
B.Obtain additional information on further curricula use from the subcontractor and other San Diego
area teachers
Product: Curricula Usage Document
~-~
Task 5. Target Chula Vista area elementary and junior high schools for
subcontractor curricula usage and/or presentations
ADraft and prepare letters describing project and its availability
1. Direct letters to school principals, curricula administrators, etc. for distribution to teachers
2. Letters would describe appropriate curricula for targeted grade level
3. Send one copy of final copy of letter to ClWMB Project Manager
Product Subcontractor curricula usage letter
Task 6. Detennine classrooms targeted for curricula usage, in-service
training, and presentations
A.Compile list of principals, administrators and teacher who have expressed an interest in utilizing the
curricula or receiving presentations
1. Cross check list to establish geographic dispersion and range of grade levels
2. If necessary to achieve desired number of classrooms, contact by telephone additional schools to
discuss use of the curricula
B.Meet with principals, administrators, and teachers as necessary to establish targeted classrooms
C.Send one copy of classroom list to CIWMB Project Manager
Product: List of classrooms targeted for curricula usage~ in-service training, and presentations
Task 7. Set dates and locations for teacher in-service training
A.Establish training schedule and arrange for training locations
B.Notify teachers to training times and locations appropriate for their grade level
C.Reconfirm dates to verify attendance
Task 8. Conduct teacher in-service training and provide one copy of
curricula to each participating teacher
A.Prepare for in-service training
B.Set-up for training
C.Conduct training and distribute curricula
1.Project Intern/Conservation Coordinator will present overview of project and HHW information and
collection programs specific for Chula Vista
2.Subcontractor staff will present curricula and usage
D.Send one copy of training package materials to CIWMB Project Manager
2
t-7
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
Task 9. Compile list of classrooms requesting HHW presentations (Use
same criteria as in Task 6)
AList will be compiled concurrently with list for in-service training, with additional targeting as
necessary, through direct contact with school administrators, teachers, students, and interested parents.
B.Submit one copy of list to CIWMB Project Manager
Product: List of classrooms requesting HHW presentations
Task 10. Define targeted classrooms for presentations and schedule
training
AEstablish targeted classrooms for presentations
B.Consult with teachers and subcontractor staff to determine the best times to offer presentations
C.Establish presentation schedule
D.Confirm and reconfirm presentation schedule with participating teachers
Product: Classroom Presentation Schedule
Task 11. Conduct classroom presentations
A.Prepare presentations
B.Set-up display of product samples and video
C.Conduct training
I.Project Intern/Conservation Coordinator will present overview of project and HHW information
and collection programs specific for Chula Vista
2.Subcontractor staff presents curricula and usage
D.Submit training package to CIWMB Project Manager for approval
Task 12. Distribute informational materials to school children
AObtain HHW written informational materials developed by the subcontractor and San Diego County
I.Print additional copies of the City's HHW informational flyer
2. Distribute materials
B.Submit one copy of informational materials to CIWMB Project Manager for approval
Task 13. Implement disposal awareness "Sticker" campaign for K-3 grades
ADesign and print stickers. Model after "Mr. Yuk" and utilize slogan "Use Me Up and Dispose of Me
Properly" as models.
1. Submit copy of sticker to CIWMB Project Manager
B.Distribute stickers at presentations for K-3 and adults
1. Encourage children to place stickers on HHW containers in the home
Product: HHW Sticker
3
~...8'
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
Task 14. Design and Distribute Coloring Sheets Utilizing County Logo
AObtain County logo
B.Design coloring sheets
1. Submit coloring sheets to ClWMB Project Manager for review and comment
C.Print coloring sheets
D.Distribute to children in classrooms and at community events
Product: Coloring sheers
OBJECITVE 2. TO FOSTER AN INCREASED AWARENESS IN ADULTS OF
TIlE PROBLEMS CREATED BY lHE PRESENCE OF HHW IN lHE HOME,
COMMUNITY, AND IN THE ENVIRONMENT.
Task 1. Obtain informational materials for adults from the County, the
subcontractor, and City.
A.Gather County and subcontractor literature for future distribution
B.Print additional copies of City HHW flier
C.Send one copy of all literature to CIWMB project manager
Product: City, County and Subcontractor HHW Uterature
Task 2. Create list of libraries, community centers, high schools, and retail
centers as literature distribution sites
A.List all current HHW literature distribution sites
B.List potential new distribution sites
C.Develop merged list for distribution of literature
Product: List of locations for HHW education materials distribution
Task 3. Deliver literature to sites on distribution list
A.Maintain record of site and amount of literature distributed
B.Periodically count literature at distribution sites and replenish literature as needed
C.Continue to maintain ongoing literature at all literature drop off points
D.Monitor sites for effectiveness by maintaining contact with site manager and by consulting records for
quantity of literature drop off and frequency
E.Mailliterature as requested by citizens
.4
(P'?
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
Task 4. Purchase mobile educational display unit
A.Work with vendor to order unit and accessories
B.Augment unit with photographs, signs, and product samples
C.Experiment with appropriate and effective display set-up
Product: Mobil educational display writ
Task 5. Target locations for mobile display set-up
A.Create potential list for display set-up
B.Make contact list for display set-up
C.Establish schedule for display set-up
D.Confirm schedule dates with site manager and reconfirm as date approaches
Product: Schedule of dates and locations for mobile display writ set-up
Task 6. Deliver and set-up mobile educational display unit
ADeliverdisplay unit to scheduled location
B.5et-up display unit
C.Monitor display unit for literature and general up-keep
Task 7. Target groups for adult HHW educational presentations
AList all potential groups, including seniors, Mexican Americans, community service organizations
B.Contact all potential organizations to discuss availability of presentations
C.Establish list of all interested organizations. Prioritize by target group and geographic dispersion
D.Consult with subcontractor staff and organization staff to establish schedule and location for
presentations
E.Confirm schedule and reconfirm as presentation date approaches
F.Submit list to CIWMB Project Manager
Product: List of interested organizations for adult HHW presentations and presentation schedule
Task 8. Conduct presentations to targeted adult groups
A.Conduct presentations in English and Spanish
B.Promote use of County of San Diego's HHW hotline
C.Promote increased awareness and use of APTEC permanent HHW disposal facility in Chula Vista and
County Mobile HHW collection events
5
~-If)
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
Task 9. Utilize existing Neighborhood Watch Volunteer Program (NWVP)
for neighborhood contact
AAttend NWVP meetings and contact volunteers to recruit block captains and others to distribute
literature
B.Work with volunteers to sponsor neighborhood forums on HHW
C.Participate in neighborhood events
D.Write articles for Neighborhood Watch Program newsletter and develop inserts for monthly mailings to
block associations
1. Send one copy of article published in newsletter and insert
E.Promote increased usage of recycled paint in anti-graffiti programs and community clean-ups
Product Newsletter article and insert
Task 10. Contact volunteer and civic organizations to recruit volunteers for
literature distribution
AContact potential organizations and City Departments
B.Arrange to discuss volunteer opportunities/announce opportunities though newsletter, flier, or other
means
Task 11. Coordinate staff for participation in city community events
AMake arrangements to set-up HHW mobile educational display unit and distribute literature at
community events
B.Attend events, set-up display unit, staff booth
C.Submit one copy of schedule and program report to ClWMB Project Manager
Product: Participation schedule for community events
Task 12. Distribute HHW information at recycling presentations and
employee recycling program training in conjunction with ongoing recycling
programs
A.Distribute literature and give oral presentations to residents and employees
B.Jnclude HHW disposal information as it relates to small businesses
Task 13. Establish waste exchange program for businesses
A.Work with area industries and business to establish list of HW by products available for use in other
industries
B.Coordinate listing with ClWMB's CALMAX
6
~-II
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
OBJECTIVE 3. TO FOSTER CONSUMER AWARENESS OF NONTOXIC
ALTERNATIVES TO TIlE USE OF TOXIC PRODUCTS COMMONLY FOUND
IN HOUSEHOLDS.
Task 1. Print Consumer Shopping Guide of HHW products and alternatives
A Wotk with subcontractor to print shopping guide
B.Send 10 copies of guide to CIWMB project manager
Product: Shopping Guide
Task 2. Develop Spanish translation of Consumer Shopping Guide
ADevelop translation
B.Print Spanish shopping guide
C.5end 10 copies of guide to ClWMB project manager
Product: Spanish shopping guide
Task 3. Target locations and set dates for mobile display set-up and
distribution of Consumer Shopping Guide
ACreate potential list for display set-up and literature distribution
B.Make contact list for display set-up and literature distribution
C.Establish schedule for display set-up and literature distribution
D.Confirm schedule dates with site manager and reconfirm as date approaches
E.Coordinate with staff and make arrangements to set-up HHW mobile educational display unit and
distribute literature at community events
F.Attend events, set-up display unit, staff booth
G.Submit copy of schedule and program report to CIWMB Project Manager (if combined with Objective
2, Task 5 okay to submit one list)
Product: Schedule of dates and locations for mobile display unit set-up and community events
Task 4. Create and distribute consumer lists of toxic products used by
children, pre-teen and young adults and present alternatives
AGather and evaluate existing literature on toxics used by youth and alternatives
B.Jncorporate information into development of youth consumer shopping guides
l.Submit draft guide to CIWMB project manager for comment and approval
2.Jncorporate CIWMB Project Manager comments, as mutually agreed upon
3.Send 10 copies of youth guide to CIWMB Project Manager
Product: Youth guide to consumer products and alternatives
7
~ -/,;(
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
Task 5. Develop list of retail stores for permanent point-of-purchase
signage for non-toxic products that can be used as safe alternatives to
common household toxies
ADevelop list of retail stores known to be environmentally concerned
B.Contact manager or other parties to discuss project and potential for participation
C.Negotiate establishment of model program
D.Submit list to CIWMB project manager
Product: List of retail stores
Task 6. Design point-of-purchase signage, place in retail stores with HHW
literature
A.Design signs
l.Submit draft signs to CIWMB project manager for review
2.Incorporate CIWMB project manager comments, as mutually agreed on
3.Send one copy of each sign to CIWMB project manager
B.Place signs in retail stores at points. of. purchase
C.Place literature in central location
D.Monitor signs and literature for replacement need
E.Continue contact with store manager for feedback evaluation
Product: Point of purchase signs
OBJECTIVE 4. TO EDUCATE THE WASTE GENERATOR ABOUT THE
PROPER DISPOSAL OF HHW TO SIGNIFICANTIY INCREASE THE
NUMBER OF CHUIA VISTA RESIDENTS PARTICIPATING IN PROPER
DISPOSAL OF HHW.
Task 1. Work with media to promote HHW awareness and advertize
availability of collection at APTEC in South Bay region
A.Develop at least 2 PSAs
B.Develop and distribute bi-monthly news releases
C.Work with County staff to include Project specific information in regular South Bay news releases
Product: PSAs and news releases
8
6"1:;
City of Chula Vista
Exhibit A
HD-91-0309-37
OBJECTIVE 5_ TO INSTITlTTIONAUZE HHW CURRICULA AS PART OF THE CHULA VISTA
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTIUCf'S AND THE SWEE1WATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTIUCf'S
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING AS WELL AS FOSTERING ONGOING ADULT HHW AWARENESS_
Task 1. Monitor HHW curricula and awareness project and project
effectiveness
AEvaluate project as proposed in Element 11 of objective 1
B.Submit one copy of evaluation to CIWMB project manager
Product: Project report containing monitoring and evaluation data
9
t. -Ii
RESOLUTION NO. /~ 7ft?
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A STATE OF CALIFORNIA
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE GRANT TO ESTABLISH
A HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE EDUCATION PROJECT
WHEREAS, last February, staff developed a proposal for a
Household Hazardous Waste Reduction, Alternatives, and Disposal
Educational Awareness Project; Council authorized a $47,826
application to be submitted to the State of California, Integrated
Waste Management Board and authorized the City Manager to execute
the contract when and if received.
WHEREAS, the city has now been notified of a $25,050
award, with only 14 applicants receiving awards for a total of
$338,829, out of 54 applications requesting over $3.5 million in
funding.
WHEREAS, California State Health and Safety Code
prohibits the disposal of hazardous waste at solid waste landfills.
The county of San Diego, in order to enforce the State law is
currently conducting load checks of vehicles entering the landfill;
vehicles found to contain hazardous materials may be fined.
WHEREAS, Chula vistans dispose of an estimated 400 tons
of household hazardous waste each year, most of which ends up at
the Otay Landfill.
WHEREAS, It is staff's intent to utilize the grant funds
to provide information to Chula vista residents and school children
about the importance of using alternatives to toxic household
hazardous products when available and to properly dispose of waste
from household hazardous products.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chula
vista does hereby accept a State of California, Integrated Waste
Management Board Household Hazardous Waste Program Grant to
establish a household hazardous waste education project.
Athena Bradley
Conservation Coordinator
Bruce M. Boogaar
city Attorney
by
Presented by
i3=r
~
~~-I
RESOLUTION NO.
/67/1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING FY 1992-1993 BUDGET
TO ADD A TEMPORARY, PART-TIME POSITION IN
UNCLASSIFIED SERVICE IN THE WASTE MANAGEMENT
PROGRAM AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR SUCH
PROGRAM AND POSITION
WHEREAS, last February, staff developed a proposal for a
Household Hazardous Waste Reduction, Al ternati ves, and Disposal
Educational Awareness Project; Council authorized a $47,826
application to be submitted to the State of California, Integrated
Waste Management Board and authorized the city Manager to execute
the contract when and if received.
WHEREAS, the City has now been notified of a $25,050
award, with only 14 applicants receiving awards for a total of
$338,829, out of 54 applications requesting over $3.5 million in
funding.
WHEREAS, the RAD Project will involve targeting
classrooms (K-Middle and Junior High) for household hazardous waste
curricula usage, conducting high school and adult presentations, a
sticker campaign for young children, mobil educational display
unit, distributing consumer awareness materials, and small business
hazardous materials awareness outreach.
WHEREAS, a portion of the grant funds, $7695, will be
utilized to fund the salary, benefits and mileage reimbursement of
an intern to work with the City's Conservation Coordinator to
implement the project.
WHEREAS, an additional amount of $10,728 of the grant
funds will be utilized to subcontract with the county's Household
Hazardous Materials Program educational contract holder to provide
classroom presentations, teacher in-service trainings and
corresponding curricula, presentations to adults (both in English
and in Spanish) and printed materials.
WHEREAS, grant funds amounting to $1,226 have also been
awarded to purchase a mobile educational display unit that will
provide pictures, samples and information on household hazardous
waste to be set-up in public areas and additional grant funds of
$5,701 will allow the purchase of educational stickers for young
children and consumer awareness guides (English and Spanish).
WHEREAS, the total cost of the RAD Project is $33,383 and
the City'S "hard match" for the Project is $300 and an additional
$5,413, as "soft match" for the grant.
1
~O-I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Chula
vista does hereby amend the FY 1992-93 budget to add a temporary,
part-time position in the Unclassified Service in the Environmental
Management Unit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $25,050 is hereby
appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund
and $300 appropriated from the Waste Management Trust Fund and
transferred into the following accounts:
$7,090 into Account 270-2705-5105
$104 into Account 270-2705-5143
$266 into Account 270-2705-5145
$235 into Account 270-2705-5225
$10,578 into Account 270-2705-5201
$636 into Account 270-2705-5212
$1,226 into Account 270-2705-5568
$5,175 into Account 270-2705-5331
$40 into Account 270-2705-5218
~
by
~
Presented by
as to
Athena Bradley
Conservation Coordinator
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
2
tlJ~~
/1P7J~
RESOLUTION NO. *****
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 2, 1992, DECLARING THE
RESULT AND SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City
of Chula Vista, California, on Tuesday, June 2, 1992, as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form, and manner as
provided by law; that voting precincts were properly established; that election
officers were appointed and that in all respects the election was held and
conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made
and declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the
El ect ions Code of the State of Cali forni a for the ho 1 di ng of e 1 ecti ons in charter
cities; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 16077 adopted February 26, 1991, the
Registrar of Voters canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the
results to the City Council, the results are received and made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the number of ballots cast at the polls was 20,926 with
5,888 absent voter ballots for a grand total number of ballots cast in the City
of 26,814; and
SECTION 2. That the two propositions voted for at the election are as
follows:
Name:
Yes:
No:
Proposition H - Advisory: Bi-National
Airport at Otay Mesa
Proposition J - Charter Amendment
Run-off Elections
4,403
21,054
12,298
11,762
SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number
of votes gi ven in the City to each propositions are 1 i sted in Exhi bit "A"
attached.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council
of the City of Chula Vista, a statement of the result of the election, showing:
(1) the whole number of ballots case in the City; (2) the names of the
propositions voted for; and (3) the number of votes given at each precinct to
each proposition.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this ** day of July, 1992.
7'/
Resolution No. *****
Page 2
Presented by:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
?,:;..
Bruce M.
~
~
~
w
~
e
~
0
~
~
N
~
I
~
N
I
~
0
~
Resolution No. *****
Page 3
EXHIBIT "A"
N~~M~_~_~O_~~~N~Mm_~~~~~N~-OMN~ON~M~OO~~
N~~~mN~~MN~N~oo=N~m~~=N~m~~M~o=~~~~OM~.O
~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o ~~~~o~__~~~~~O~MW~~M~N~Mm~~oM~~WMWMN-MWO
z mMwMWM=~owMmm~o~M~N-WW~~~~-~MN~N-~-m~N=m
____ ____ _____________________N
~
~
0
,
z ~
~
~
~
z
w
z ~
0 0 ~
~ z w
~ w >
u ~
w e~ /
~ Z /
W ~o /
~W~ /
> ~~ / ~
~ ~~u /
eN oew /
~~ ~~~ /
~~ ~uw /
~-
~
IN 0
Z
>w >
~z e
Z~ ~
~~ 0
0
u ~
e ~
0
~ ~
w ~
- 0
0 ~
~-
z ~>
e e~ ~
~ 0 w
~~ >
e_
z> /
00 /
_e /
~~~ /
e / ~
~ze / ~
Ol~ / e
~_w / u
~m~ /
~
~
~
m ~
~
~
>
~
w
~
.
.
~
~ e
e ~
> ~
z -
e >
u
e
~ ~
e ~
- ~
u u
-
~ ~
~ 0
0
>
~
. -
. u
=N~~-mMm~om~MMm~~-mNww-wm~mO~=~O=N~WOOMN
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~O=~-~~~w=N~~mm-~~-O~_~~O~N~~m-~MmMm~m~m
~w~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~.
WM_N~~OOWWN~-W~N~M~~~MOOMOm.~W~M=~~w~m..
=~WWWN~~M~O~NMO~NNM-M~~NW-NNWN~O=.WMN-~~
_________________N______ -------
~mNmm-mMOMw~mw--w~~~Nm~M~~m-~-~owo~-m-~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NN_oo~m-mN~~~o~~~-~N~~-N~~MN-~mmM~m~-MMN
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~m~~~~m~~m~mm
~~mo~~~~M~mmON~~N~~-NmomM-~O~N~N~~_m~~m-
_~c~m-=~om-_mM~~~~~O~O~Nm_-M~N~~~~_mMomo
_NNNN NNNM-N-NNNNNNMNNNMNNNNN--NM-NNNM
MNm-N~NmO~~M--m~~M~~mNM~~~-m~~~O~OMm-m~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~~mmmNom-~-MNmO~~~N~~Nm~M~~~m.O-~~-Nm~~~
N----NN-N---N-N---------------NNN--N----
_~~mm_N~_NmM-~~O_~~MmM~m~M-omm~-~-_~NN~~
~-N~~~~-~~N~~~_~_~M~_~~~_~_~~M~~~~.~~_~~
O~~M~.~N~N_~N~~N_~N~~m~m~~-N~O~~O-~M-~M~
NOMNmm~O~~~-~-MN-Nm~N~-~~N~mN~M~MMm~m~~~
N--MMNM-NMN-NMNMMMNNMMMNM-NNMNMNNMMNNNMM
_N~~om~N-N~oo-mm~~_NMMN~~~-OO-MM.m~m-.~m
m~-mM~~N~m-~_OM~mmMmo-~o~-mNmN-~NmmmN~wm
~~~~om-~~m~mmom~mm~~~mm~m-~~~m-m~mm~~~oO
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000
OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOQOOOONO-NO-OO-OOOOOO-OO
_N_~~mm-_~~~mo_~m-M~~mmmmmO-M~~~mN_~~~m-
~~~~~~~~~ww~~~~~~mmm=mmm~mmmmmmmmooooOO-
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNMMMMMMM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~-----~---------~---~---------------~---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~x~~~x~xxx~~~~~xxxx~xx~xxxxxxx~~xx
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
?0
Resolution No. *****
Page 4
=
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
N
~
,
~
N
,
~
o
~
~
0
I
Z
~
<<
~
z
w
Z ~
0 0
- z
~ ~
u ~
w ~~
~ z
w <<0
~~-
> ~~
<< ~<<u
~N O~~
~~ <<~~
-~ ~u~
<<-
~
ON
>w >
~z ~
Z~ ~
~~ 0
0
u ~
~
0
~ ~
w <<
- 0
0 ~
<<-
Z ->
~ ~<<
~ 0
~~
~-
z>
00
-~
~~-
~
~z~
Ol~
<<_w
~m~
.
.
~
~ ~
c ~
> ~
z -
~ >
u
~
~ ~
~ ~
- ~
u u
-
~ ~
~ 0
0
>
~
. -
. u
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
w
>
/
/
"
~ ~~m_~~~~~~~_~m~mmNmW~~~MMO~M~~NNM
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MOMN~~N~~M~W_~._Nm.~O~=WMNO=_~_.N ~.
~~~~.~~~~~.~~...~M.......~~.~~~~~ ..
o
z
O.NW~O.NN.MMMM..NO~~N~.~-O.N~w.wm
_W~~_.~_N.mNWN_m=W.MONmNOMN~N~OMW
--- ------ ---- - ---------
~~
~~
ON
~~
~~
~~
~~
MO
~~
~-
~~
~~
==
o ~~.~w-w~wm~NmMMNmwwM~mMwwOM~Mom.~ Nm
z ~W.M-wo~m-~NmM-mNNwM-MM.~NONNOW-O Nm
_NN_NNM__N_NNNN_M_NNNNMN_NN_N__N_ mm
~
w._mN_ww~~_m._~N_m_.N~N~~OW~W.mm~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
wmW~N~~.~WMMm~~m~o~-m.-Mwmm-mNm~~
....w~....~~.~~~.w~~~~~~~..~.....
N-
~ ~mMWM~wmN~mmN-~O.Nw-~wmMOMmmNOW.M ~M
~
w
>
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
~
~
~
m
~
w
<<
~
~
~
u
~
<<
~
>
wooomN=ON~..M_N_NMm~mOM~NON~m=~~M
~~~~~~~~e~~:~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~:~m-~
/
~
~_~~~M~_mM_N=mMo~~~m~~N~O~NNmo~~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
N=N~~_=M~mMm~~=m~~m=~N~M-N~~~M~mm
=~=~===mm~=~m~~~=~~~mm==~=~~=~~~~
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~-~~~=-W~O~_NMM-ONOM~~NW~~.MM~NO- .~
_N_______N_N_NNN-NNN----N-NN_NNNN
~~-~WOOW~~NNoo=-mwmo~_m=Nw~m.~m~m
M~~NM~.MM~MW.~W~MM~~M~..~.WMMM~~N
Nmw.Ow~-~.Nww-mN~wN.=wMNmmwN=M=MM
_WO~wM~NMmomMN=~~~.-woooW==~w.Nm.
NMM-NMMNNNNNMMNNM-MMNM.MNNN_N_NN_
.~~m.wmN~~..W~~N_N~~.oom~~~~.~.MM
~~mm~~o-=~mo.o~~WVWwN=~=NmmONWOM~
w_owmm_~~m~mmmwwm.om~=om-mo~~~~o~
.." .. ..
~-
~~
~M
M~
mo
~~
MN
ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo~.~.
OO--OOO-No_o-mO=O-NM.W~~O-oOOOOO-M=~=
M..~~mm__NNMM~~~WWWWWWW~~~OMW~=OM----
_______NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~~==m=mmm=mmm
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~www~=mmm
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~---~-~---~----~-----~----------- >>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>cc
C~
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc 00
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~uuao
I~IZIIIIIIIIIIZZZZIIZZIZZ~Z~Z~~ZZWW~~
uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuoo~<<
?-r
..
..
..
w
'"
e
0.
o
..
..
N
..
,
..
N
,
..
o
..
..
0
,
z
"
a:
....
z
w
z "
0 0
.... z
.... w
u "
W ..V>
.J Z
w a:0
..,w....
> ........
a: ..a:u
eN O"W
".. a::!:.J
...... ..uw
a:-
..
'N
>W >
....z e
z" ....
".., 0
0
u ....
e
0
'" ....
w a:
.... 0
0 0.
a:~
z ....>
e ..a:
v> 0
.J'"
e....
z>
00
_e
:!:....-
..
o.ze
a''''
a:_W
...."
/
/
/
/
/
/
tt. mo Oalcn-cncncncn
=0 !t'lmma:lCllZ)COCl)
~It'l ~"f"f'lf"f"f"f"f
o N"
Z "N
....
MNNtOl.ONNN
Ml.OtD(O)NlOtOlD
M,..,...Lt)N""""""
_\1) N__lDlll___
.............. ..
tt. -0 o--cn----
'"
W
>
/ N"
/
/
-0 It'l--....O---
Ltl It) It) ItH(Hl'Ht'lln LfI It'l
..'"
....
N"
Ma)CDMlt'llXlCDd)
Ll'lalC! 'If 1J'l000C1Hn
CZ)NNONNNN
.............. ..
NNN,...l/lNNN
tt. r-oO 1"1""'=(')"""""""
NN
....
1J')NNM-NNN
a)CDlXlaJCZ)a)CDCD
o
z
....
"'..
0'"
O"f"fC71It'l'llt'lf"
_l/'lIt'lM_\t')1t'l1t'l
,...0000000
.............. ..
-to o:I'--NO)---
1"1_ NN- NNN
tt. MO =)('')("11''1''''(')('')(")
,... II) o:r,...,... lD a:".... "'"....
'"
W
>
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
'"
....
.J
..
.
. '"
W
a:
'"
'" e
e ....
> '"
Z -
e >
u
e
.J .J
e "
- :!:
u u
-
.. ..
.. 0
0
>
....
. -
. u
....
'"
e
u
'"
OX
....
>
--------
"''''
0"
..'"
..'"
CZlMC">C71'lfMMM
_OON"'OOO
CD"f"fC")cot"IIf
............ ..
.. ""NN"f "''II'
....
_N
....
IDO
NN
co 1IIt,,(Qal"f.....
CXl__Na)___
CQCZlCOO""COCOa)
.............. ..
U'HD<Dltl-lDlD<D
NN__NNN
....-
IDID
....
cncnMtOl>>O'icn
lDtOMMtOlDtO
o:r"f'ltO'lf"'.
............ ..
--0----
lDtOMMlDtO<D
IDID
ze
.J 0....
ew ...J_V)
Z~ <I-...
0< _c:>
_z a:U
VlW>>O:;)C
>V)V)...J..JlnQ..J
:>.cW lDlD_W::;!
c a:w:E:E> z:
Cl.:)I-LL.lwa:l.LU
OWZCln""WC
uJI-OI-VH/H1. l&-
a::V)UV'lCC:;)OO
...JlI)CW VHD
C..J.J:;):E:%J::E: >
I-...JUOI-I-t-I-l-C....
OOLUuJOOl"-OlV1Z-
I-~Oa:ll'I'lf""""-NU
7-.5'
Resolution No. *****
Page 5
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
SUBMITTED BY:
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Resolution II; 71.JApproving a "National Night
Out" 5K Fun Runl2 Mile Walk to be held at
Bayside Park on August 4, 1992 and Authorizing the
Mayor to execute a Hold Harmless Indemnification
Agreement with the 'port District for this event.
Chief of Police V, '.
':}Jl\
City ManagerJC, \}':\ ,/ (4/5ths Vote Yes_No.lLl
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Agreement
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
August 4, 1992 will represent the ninth annual "National Night Out." National Night Out is a
nationwide effort to heighten crime prevention awareness, strengthen neighborhood spirit and
police-community relations, generate support and participation for local crime prevention
programs and sending a message to criminals that our communities are organized and fighting
back! This evening all neighborhoods across the country are encouraged to turn on their outside
lights from 8:00 to 10:00 P.M. and spend the evening outdoors.
The Police Department is recommending that a 5K Fun Runl2 Mile Walk be held at Bayside
Park on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 from 5:00 to 8:00 P.M. We anticipate that the event would
draw approximately 300 participants. Entry fees from the 5K/2 Mile Walk and donations from
the community will offset the costs of the entire event.
In addition to the 5K Fun Runl2 Mile Walk, there will be demonstrations, live entertainment,
display booths and food booths. Some of those scheduled to attend include: the Police Canine
Unit, S.W.A.T. displays, crime lab display, classic car display and Crime Prevention Displays.
There will also be a special appearance by McGruff, the crime dog and Pluggie, the fire
prevention hydrant. The Police Department's Crime Prevention Program provides food and
refreshments for the participants, these costs will be offset by entry fees to the 5K Fun Run and
2 Mile Walk.
Since the event is proposed to take place on Port District land, the Port District has asked that
the City submit a certificate of insurance naming the Port as additional insured. In addition, the
~,./
Page 2, Item 'if{
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Port has also requested that the City sign a Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement. The
Risk Manager has reviewed this request and stated that there will be no additional cost to the
City to provide either of these.
FISCAL IMPACT:
This event, except the 5K Runl2 Mile Walk, will be presented free to the public. Food costs
are estimated at $200 to $500, funds are budgeted in account 1050-5344.
8" '..2
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
TIDELAND ACTIVITY PERMIT
PERMITTEE: CITY OF CHULA VISTA
USE OR ACTIVITY: CRIME PREVENTION PICNIC, FUN RUN/WALK
LOCATION FOR WHICH PERMIT ISSUED:
BAYS IDE PARK
EFFECTIVE DATES:
TUESDAY AUGUST 4TH, 1992
SECURITY DEPOSIT:$
-0-
THIS PERMIT FOR TIDELAND USE IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE
FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. Permittee shall comply with all applicable laws, rules
and regulations of the District and other governmental
entities.
2. Permittee shall keep the property and all equipment used
in connection with this permit in a clean, safe and sanitary
manner and in good repair at all times. Allor any portion of
the security deposit shall be available unconditionally to the
District for the purpose of cleaning or repairing damages to
the property upon termination of this permit.
3. This permit may be cancelled by either party by the
giving of twenty-four (24) hours notice in writing to the
other party. Such cancellation shall be without liability of
any nature.
4. This permit shall not be transferred or assigned.
5. Permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless
District, its officers and employees against all causes of
action, for judicial relief of any kind, for damage to
property of any kind whatsoever, and to whomever belonging,
including Permittee, or injury to or death of any person or
persons, including employees of Permittee, resulting directly
or indirectly from activities in connection with the issuance
and performance of this permit or arising from the use of the
property, facilities or services of District, its officers or
employees.
8'-J
6. Permittee shall maintain comprehensive public liability
(covering operations, products and completed operations) and
blanket contractual coverage insurance throughout the term of
this permit. The policies shall, as a minimum, provide the
following forms of coverage:
(A) Personal Injury and Bodily Injury:
One Person $
One Occurrence $
Combined single limit
$1,000,000.00
(B) Property Damage $
Certificates of such insurance, in a form satisfactory to the
District, shall-be filed with District's Community Relations
Department. Insurance certificates filed pursuant to this
permit shall contain a non-cancellation-without-notice clause
and shall provide that copies of cancellation notices shall be
sent to the District.
7. The rights and privileges extended by this permit are
non-exclusive.
8. Permittee shall not engage in any activity on property of
the District other than the activity for which this permit is
expressly issued.
9. Permittee shall be subject to and comply with any special
conditions attached hereto.
10. Permittee shall comply with all requirements and
directives of the Port Director of District.
11. In the event of failure of Permittee to comply with any
provision of this permit, this permit may, at the discretion
of the Port Director, be terminated immediately.
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
Approved:
Permittee hereby accepts this permit and agrees to comply with all
the terms and conditions thereof.
Permittee's signature
Address:
276 FOURTH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CA 91910
Telephone:
691-5187
~1
CHECKLIST FOR THE USE OF TIDELAND PROPERTY
Date request received in
CGA Dept.:
Please complete each item below.
1. Sponsoring individual or group:
City of Chula Vista
2. Address and telephone number of contact person:
Chula Vista Police Dept., 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910
691-5187, Rosemary Reznik, Crime Prevention Unit
3. What type of event is planned?
4.
National Night Out 5K run/walk, crime prevention displays promoting
_~olice-communityrelatiofts.
Where exactly on the baytront?
Bayside Park
5. Day and date of event:
Tuesday, August 4th, 1992
6.
Time period: Start
5:00pm
Finish 8: OOpm
7. Will traffic be affected?
YES
8. How many persons involved or expected to attend?
300+
9. If large group, what security arrangements have been made?
Chula Vista Police Department
10. If commercial or catered event, do you have liability insurance coverage?
YES
Please return this checklist by (within ten 10 working days) or
your request for an event on Port tidelands will be canceled.
7/90
~f/8"
~{ft-
:~~~
~----~
.....a::--.c-~
CITY OF
(HUlA VISTA
PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT
June 15, 1992
Robert F. Driver Co., Inc.
Attn: Susan Reichelderfer
3636 Birch Street, Ste 230
Newport Beach CA 92660
Dear Ms. Reichelderfer:
Please arrange to have a Certificate of Insurance and
Insured policy endorsement for $1,000,000 general
liability insurance sent to:
San Diego Unified Port District
Attn: Mr. James Anderson
3165 Pacific Highway
San Diego CA 92101
Additional
commercial
The City of Chula Vista will sponsor an event called "National
Night Out" at Bayside Park which happens to be Port District
property. The event includes a 5K run/walk and crime prevention
displays. It will take place on Tuesday, August 4, 1992 from 5 pm
to 8 pm. Approximately 300 people are expected to attend.
Please call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Di:::~~
Risk Manager
cc: Rosema~ Reznik
a524
g',?
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 9191011619) 691-5096
RESOLUTION NO. I' 713
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
A HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
WITH THE PORT DISTRICT FOR "NATIONAL NIGHT
OUT" FUN RUN EVENT
The city Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, August 4, 1992 will represent the eighth annual
"National Night Out" which is a nationwide effort to heighten crime
prevention awareness, strengthen neighborhood spirit and pOlice-
community relations and generate support and participation for
local crime prevention programs; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department is recommending
Fun Run/2 Mile Walk be held at Bayside Park on
August 4, 1992 from 5:00 to 8:00 p.m.; and
that a 5K
Tuesday,
WHEREAS, since the event is proposed to take place on
Port District land, the Port District has asked that the City
submit a certificate of insurance naming the Port as additional
insured; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the Port has also requested that
the city sign a Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City
of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Hold
Harmless Indemnification Agreement with the Port District, a copy
of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk, in connection
with a "National Night Out" event to be held at Bayside Park on
August 4, 1992.
Presented by
J;ei as to form
Bruce M. Bo aard
city Attorney
by
Richard Emerson, Chief of
Police
(Res\5KRun)
8" '?
ITEM TITLE: a)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
b)
Item~
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Resolution 1''11'1 Approving the initiation of proceedings
and describing the lmprovements for Open Space District No. 26
(Park Bonita)
Reso 1 ut i on /~ 7 if'Fi 1 i ng and accept i ng report and
declaring the City's intention to establish Chula Vista Open
Space District No. 26 (Park Bonita) and setting the time and
place for hearing thereon ... ~
Director of Public Work~ (~ 17
Di rector of o~ Parks i~~ecreat i orliv
City Manager JG. \cv~:, )\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..lL)
In order to initiate the proceedings for the formation of open space districts
the City Engineer must prepare and file a report in accordance with the
Streets and Hi ghways Code. Thi s reso 1 ut i on will begi n the process for the
formation of the open space district for Park Bonita.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions which:
1. Approve the Engineer' Report.
2. Declare the Council's intention to form the proposed district in
accordance with Section 17.07 of the Municipal Code and Section 22587 of
the Streets and Highways Code.
3. Direct the City Clerk to notice the publ ic hearing in accordance with
Sections 22556 and 22588 of the Streets and Highways Code.
4. Set August 18, 1992, at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for public
hearing.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Reoort on Ooen Soace District No. 26 (Park Bonita)
I. Backaround
This report was prepared pursuant to City Council direction and in
compl iance with the requirements of Division 15, Part 2, Chapter 1 of
the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Cal ifornia and the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, Section 17.07.
9-1
Page 2, Item ,
Meeting Date 7/21/92
On November 14, 1989 by Resol ution 15388, the City Council approved the
tentative map for Chula Vista Tract No. 90-3, Park Bonita Subdivision.
The final map was approved June 5, 1991 by Resolution 16184. A
condit i on of appro va 1 requi red that the open space lots created by the
map be maintained by the open space district. Additionally, a condition
required that the developer provide for the perpetual maintenance of the
brow ditch located westerly of the subdivision. Staff recommends that
this be accomplished through the open space district.
II. Boundaries of District
The boundary of the district corresponds to the boundary of Chula Vista
Tract 90-3, Park Bonita and is shown on the Assessment Diagram on file
in the Office of the City Engineer. A reduced copy, Attachment "A" is
included in this report. As permitted in the Streets and Highways Code
Section 22571, the details of the individual lots (lines, dimensions and
bearing) to be maintained are shown in the County Assessor's Maps for
the properties on file in the San Diego County Assessor's office.
III. Maintenance Items
The areas to be maintained by maintenance contract consist of three open
space lots totalling 21,032 square feet and designated as Lots A, B,
and C on the Assessment Di agram. These are the highly vi si bl e areas
adjacent to Bonita Road and "E" Street. The facil ities and items of
maintenance included within the District are as follows:
1. Maintain landscaping and irrigation system improvements within the
desi gnated open space lots and withi n the parkways along Bonita
Road and E Street adjacent to the open space lots.
2. Maintain the theme walls located within the open space lots.
3. Maintain the brow ditch adjacent to the westerly boundary from "E"
Street to the existing curb and gutter.
The proposed maintenance program for Open Space District No. 26 consists
in general of the following:
1. Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part to any
improvement.
2. Irrigation, fertilization, trimming, and replacement of dead or
diseased landscaping.
3. Weed abatement.
4. Removal of trimmings, trash and litter.
5. Removal of debris from the brow ditch.
9-~
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
9
7/21/92
IV. Cost Estimate
The estimated annual cost for maintenance of Open Space Maintenance
District No. 26, Park Bonita is $5,560. This preliminary estimate is
based on information obtained from the developer and has been reviewed
by the open space coordinator. See attachment "B".
Si nce turnover is not anti ci pated to occur until Fi sca 1 1993/94 staff
proposes a $0 assessment for Fiscal year 1992/93.
V. Assessment Schedule
The proposed district will contain 19 single family detached units. For
the purpose of distributing assessments, each single family unit is
equivalent to one assessment unit. The estimated annual assessment for
a typical single family unit would be approximately $300 based on
present costs ($5,560 , 19 = $300).
Plats are available for Council viewing.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. Cost of district formation is paid for by the
developer through a deposit. Annual staff and administration costs are
included in the assessment.
DDS:OS-027
WPC 5940E
9,,;] /'1"'/
P 02
~ .{
a f-
-:2 -cr-
t- o - "2
I \ W
\J ~
- -:5 2-
Ai
l ~ rfl ~ :t:
6 ~
III -t, ~ ~
& ~ 7- '..{'
(/) ~
~
7t ()I,
~~
il,
T
~
<1
..J
~
~
,
,
I
I
I
i?
~
-<\
\P
~
-
ul
\)..
o
It.
i.
c:.
~
u:.
9-5
~: '~--~ ~ \h\h"'.J.. \hI ~ ~
! C ~. IJH~!l\) ~ INrJ ~}'l\)' is
,~% ~ !S'~I~~'~:\h~oiii
~,>~ {"" t\) .C1\I-Il\)\P ~>
Q~~ I 2:
I ,'" ~
i~~ '!~.~ I~I 5~ S
I~ ~ i~ f I ~ :; i.i ~ :r ~
(; ~ ~ 1 . J! I; : !~ ::j
IJI~,-i !Z~, IlIi i ~
! ~ ~ ~ r; I!. ~
.~ . ~ ;\1 ~ I ~ I..... Ii'
; ~ ~ ~ ..~: ,~!~ 'm
~. ~ ~, Ii\ ~ I
.~i ~ '~ ~. ,
I ~I
I ~~
i III!{
!~~
II~~
~! ~I~
! (\ i
.1 f'l ~
1'i . I ~
~ : I ~ -.Jt- \V...
(JJ" ~?~~~~~~
'~l ~8&gIHla\
9-~
"" >
rn (')
G: !:l
o 'lit
Z
Z
l'lI
r-<
c
Ul
(')
"
, ~
o
z
-l'lI
Zo
~c:
a~
"l'lI
0<""
z!;
pg
c.
::c
if
5i'
..
~
c
rn
~
""
"
o
"
~
JIB
t<
~"3
~l~
!~
()~
or-
In"
v'g
l ~ ~
o c:
{. ~
"", -~ -
r-
=
c:
CI
c:"l
~
a
c:
~
""
"
o
""
Sl
'rn - -- ""
c 0
VI
g gl"lV1
::c ';1 ~ i ~
if ~,~il\ihi
c ::!:> ~ ~3:
fi i t~\~
... ~~I"
~~o~
l'~~~
I~::!
I~ ~
I~~
1<0 ~
(% E
i I.
I
..
~
~
g
ooj
~.
Z 61 0
!!I ~ ~
8,~ ~
.. ~ ~ ~
;:;I
~
.
-.
.
'-!:l"
;".,\A:
7>"
RESOLUTION NO. / & 7/ i
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE INITIATION OF
PROCEEDINGS AND DESCRIBING THE IMPROVEMENTS
FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 26 (PARK BONITA)
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, according to Article 1, Chapter 2, Part 2 of
Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, also known
as the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", proceedings for the
formation of an assessment district must be initiated by
resolution; and
WHEREAS, on November 14, 1989 by Resolution 15388, the
city Council approved the tentative map for Chula vista Tract No.
90-3, Park Bonita SUbdivision, and on June 5, 1991 by Resolution
16184 approved the final map; and
WHEREAS, one of the conditions of approval
tentative map required that the open space lots created by
be maintained by the open space district;
of the
the map
WHEREAS, addi tionally, a condition required that the
developer provide for the perpetual maintenance of the brow ditch
located westerly of the subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the proposed designation for this district is
Open Space District No. 26; and
WHEREAS, the open space areas to be maintained consist of
three open space lots totalling 21,032 square feet and designated
as Lots A, B, and C on the Assessment Diagram.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby initiate proceedings for the
formation of Open Space District No. 26, Park Bonita and order the
City Engineer to prepare and file a report in accordance with
Article 4 of Chapter 1 of the Landscaping and Lighting Act for Open
space District No. 24.
Presented by
&:: a. t
Bruce M. Booga
City. Attorney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
(Res\OSD26)
9/1'/
j(P71P
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING REPORT AND DECLARING
THE CITY'S INTENTION TO ESTABLISH CHULA VISTA
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 26 (PARK BONITA) AND
SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING THEREON
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of
Highways Code section 22587, a public hearing is
establish the proposed open space district; and
WHEREAS, an engineer's report was submitted by the City
Engineer for the cost of maintaining the open space district; and
that said estimated annual assessment to be charged for each parcel
is $300.00; and
Streets and
required to
WHEREAS, this report was prepared by the City Engineer or
under his direction and was presented to Council for approval in
order to proceed with the Public Hearing set for August 18, 1992 in
accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Engineer's report
for the FY 1991-92 spread of assessments for Open Space Maintenance
District No. 26 (Park Bonita).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
set August 18, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of
Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula vista, California as the date
and time for the public hearings on said assessments.
Presented by
J
Approved as
form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Res\OSD26a
98-/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /?J
Meeting Date 7/21/92
ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution Ii, 7/t, Ordering changes and modifications in
proceedi ngs and assessments in Assessment Di stri ct No. 90-1
(Salt Creek I)
b) Resolution /j, 7/7 Authorizing certain assessment district
bonds to be sold at a public sale and directing a call for
sealed bids in Assessment District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public Work<_k
Di rector of Fi nance ~ y-
City Manager jl, 'o\~lry~)
On October 22, 1991, by Resolution 16382 Council established Assessment
District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I) and levied assessments for the acquisition
and financing of certain infrastructure improvements serving the Salt Creek I
development pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The
improvements have now been completed and it is necessary that the proceedings
be final ized and the 1915 Act bonds be sold to provide the funds for the
improvement acquisition.
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-!-)
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
At the time the assessment district was establ ished, all of the improvements
were not completed, however, marketing of homes in a portion of the
deve 1 opment was about to begi n. As a result, the assessments were based on
estimated improvement costs. The improvements, which include major and
collector streets, utility systems, storm drains, reclaimed water systems,
landscaping and irrigation systems, have now been completed and the final
costs have been determined.
As a result of reductions in both construction and incidental costs, the
overall amount to be assessed to the district is being reduced from the
$5,126,385 that was approved at the public hearing, to $4,793,158. The
reduction in construction costs is $464,594, and the reduction in incidental
costs is $301,012. Partially offsetting this savings in construction and
incidental costs, however, is a reduction of $432,378 in the amount of
deve 1 oper contri but i on requi red to mai nta in the assessments below the 2% of
sales price in accordance with Council Policy.
/~-/
Page 2, Item I P
Meeting Date 7/21/92
The foll owi ng tabl e shows the reduct ions in assessments, from confi rmed to
modified, resulting from the cost savings:
SFD
Conf. Mod.
TOWNHOME
Conf. Mod.
CONDO
Conf. Mod.
Total
$ 9,905 $ 8,620
3.650 2.765
$13,555 $11,385
$7,303
2.617
$9,920
$6,599
2.117
$8, 716
$7,303
2.358
$9,661
$6,599
1.940
$8,539
Construction
Incidentals
Developer
Contribution
-505
o
-940
o
-2,424 -1,302
$7,237 $7,237
Amount Assessed
$13,050 $11,385
$8,980 $8,716
Due to the reduction in the amount assessed to the district, developer
contributions are no longer required for the single family detached and
townhome units. A contribution is still required for the condominium units.
The proposed assessments are within all criteria set forth by Council policy.
The City policy limiting the lien to value ratio and total debt service and
taxes to 1 ess than 2% have been met. Attachment "A" provides a breakdown of
these items.
There are two resolutions on today's agenda which, if adopted, accomplish the
fo 11 owi ng:
1. The RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN THE PROCEEDINGS
provides for the changes to the Engi neer, s Report necessary to i ncl ude
updated construct i on and i nci dental costs and to modi fy the assessments
to the land in the district.
2. The RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ASSESSMENT 80NDS TO 8E SOLD AT PU8LIC
SALE authorizes the financial consultant to advertise for competitive
seal ed bids in the sale of the bonds to be issued as a part of these
proceedings.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. The cost of modifying the proceedings and
the bond sale is being paid by the assessment district. The developer already
deposited the 1% origination charge. Upon the bond issuance, a total of
$47,931.58 will be transferred to the General Fund.
LdeT/AY-082
WPC 6046E
/tJ...2.
.
't
""
't
~
~
"
v
<t
'\-
~
,
Iii
ci
Z
t;
~ Cf
~ ~
" 0
::J ...
al Z
o !;!
~;5lil
"''''w
""5O'"
;5"''''
O.J<N
~i~g:
lOW'"
=1.1..0:";
~O<'>-
a:l~~~
i!o~~
a:
,,0...
::>u._
"..."
!!Z::J
,,11i~
~
o
w ...
(/)...JZ""
O~::I1
~g~i
..
...
Z W
Wu.::>
<'>0""
ffi ~
..
....
g~
...
a:
~....
<;!
~<
:5
a:.... .
W;;:O
~>...
~<
83....1~
..0'"
~~
zZ
::>0
0<'>
<.>
o .
W....'
...<-
<::>1
'"zO
FZ'"
",<0
W <
@...J<<
...<"1
<::>'
"Z'"
FZ"
",<0
w <
..,:r
0"
Z-
:r
O.
u.~
<.>'"
"'0
0'"
Zuj
~=>:
<.><'>
;f.
W",O
",W'"
<~I!l
a:l~C!!
-
o
~(I)LIJ
<~<.>
~c(a:
F",..
'"
w
@ww
!;(cr:~
,,:It;
FOO
ffi(/)u..
.
.
ep"'(,,)I'-o
"'.....
q:i"':C'\J..;
(")O)_CP
C'i.~<<l.1'-:.
............<<110
~~~~
cDcDlDcD
(")t")(")C")
C\lC\!.C\lc\{
.....",.......
;f.;f.;f.;f.
....M......,
CIlCll~Cl:l.
.......- ...
CCl 01.... en
QIt)....Ol
r-:rJoiC"$
NOlMlO
t\!.M.LtllD.
NNNN
gggg
0000
......... ...
gggg
gggg
0000
~"'!:~"'!:
---
.... --...
0000
Il'iLrill'ilri
0000
!DlDIQCO
NNNN
cqillC!iIIC!iIIC!
:!::!:;!;!
~f6f6cn
ccilXicOl:O
<Q.......CP
NC'")C")C")
(\lC")C")ll)
OlXlCl)'"
"";"':"':c-.j
_MMll)
...... --
Pl~1&o
gg~~
C\!.~ .....Vl
- --
0000_
ggggz
lIi.,fttilfi
_(\1M'"
... ...--
~Sl\2~z
q-.C\{M.
... --...
...
<'>w
::>..
8~
a:
..
"
::>
Z
,.
g
Z
o
<.>
<i)~
...
Z
::>
....
~
..... ....
"'''' cqq
0'" "''''
!.~. "'-
~q
..'" "'::
"'''' "''''
.... ....
rDU) cDeD
~r::. ~r;.
.... ..'"
;f.;f. ""
"'.. "'"
CIlCll "!eI:!
--
"'''' ......
"I'" ...'"
LriC":i (ti<<i
~:5 ...'"
_"I
Nt:? Me?
00 00
qq qq
~~ ;!~
00 88
qq
~~ ~;!
"'''' "''''
"':"': "':"'=
- - --
"'''' "''''
"'''' "''''
cOld ~~
;;a; "''''
"'''' "''''
"'''' "''''
~~ ~~
0_ NN
"''''
ccicci cioi
-'" - -
"'''' ....
"'"' "''''
"'''' ....
"':N MM
;1~ ......
"'0 00
.q"! Cl:!1'-;
"'"' 0"'
"'''I "''''
"".10. f"-;.<<l.
00 00
88 88
olri lIilli
;!~ "'...
0'" "I"'
N_ O"
C\l...... Ll':!.lD.
- - - -
'"
w (/)-
..."1
" Z
0 ::>
:r ....
Z
~ g
...
-"''''
"'..'"
oir--:,...:
.."'-
qC\l.M.
~~~
"INN
......
~~~
M.~M.
- --
"""
""''''
CIlcrP',,:
0"''''
_""I
..;...;..;
0"'''
0",'"
...-..;
000
000
ggg
000
000
cicio
"'''''''
"''''"'
MMM
.........
"'"''''
wt.:.ifl5
"'''''''
o.qo.
"'''''''
"'''''''
cicid
"INN
"'......
0"''''
MMM
000
"'''''''
"'''''''
-......
ccioicri
0....
"INN
"''''...
"''''...
"":cria:i
.."'...
-"'...
NNN
800
ogg
aillilfi
0"'"
"INN
"'-...
-"'...
"'..'"
":NN
o
w
:r
~~~
,,-t:
z"w
(i)~Cl
'"
a:
;li'"
>a:
..;li
->
a:",
ON
u.a:
;f.0
ou.
..;f.
.....
!;;:!;(
~?:i
........
<<
::>::>
zz
zz
<<
00
ww
!;(!<
'""
FF
"'(/)
ww
. :
I~~)
~''''
..
PROPOSED 80\HlARlES
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-'
I ilLY CREEK J I
, FOIl THE
'" CITY OF CHULA VISTA
, '.... o_n Of 'All lIEOO, IUTI Of 0...0ll....
'.... --------------
-...,iIUIl'.... ............ ---
-.... ..-
....
--
/
/
/
/ ./
//
//
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
(/;/
/ /
/.. /
no. /
/,-;-/
/,~./
I~I
I /
/ I
I /
, I I
~~ /
, ~/'''''
,....,11.. ....
, :::rl,,~
"
-
I
~,
_APHIC .CALI
~
,..,.,
._._n
"l~
VICINITY MAP
......
MFS
alt7 ... N...
.... aaN
,..... . c.m.....
crUI ........
. . AI . .
8
8
\
, \
, \ \
\ i
, ,
\
\
1IIlI.'f1. 'IlL
-.......-----
LEGEND
.---~-,--------.
___'__'1"'" _11,_61__'''_
en"!'.......,,,. """,..... _".'4__~"
:r......~. . --
----
--
--
-"-
.., ,. -... .,...
@
--
.....__., __ __ _.-.n..-......
___M'" __
111'"-
.... ..-A__a
Q,
.-
. .~
.....
......-..,. --
..... .,...._.........-,
--".__._~~._-"'.
--.".....--
-~"'...
_n_
....n....._
..
/o-r
I
I
1
J
i
.
.
I
.
.
@
.. ,. I
** I
.*
.......
)
...
.
.
~
.
.
l.
RESOLUTION NO. 16382
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT,ORDERING THE
IMPROVEMENTS HADE, TOGETHER WITH APPURTENANCES, AND
APPROVING THE ENGINEER I S "REPORT" IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of tlie CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has
previously adopted its Resolution of Intention and initiated proceedings for the
installation of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances
and appurtenant work, including acquisition where appropriate, in a special
assessment district pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California, said special assessment district known and designated
as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Resolution of Intention, a "Report", as therein
provided, was presented, considered and approved; and,
WHEREAS, said "Report", as preliminarily approved, contained all the
matters and items called for by law and as pursuant to the provisions of said
"Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", including the following:
1. Plans and specifications of the proposed improvements;
2. Estimate of cost;
3. Diagram of Assessment District;
4. An assessment according to benefits;
5. A description of the works of improvement; and,
WHEREAS, all protests have been heard and considered, and a full hearing
has been given, all in the manner provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, notices of said hearing were duly and regularly posted, mailed and
published in the time, form and manner required by law and as evidenced by
affidavits on file with the transcript of these proceedings; and,
WHEREAS, the owners of one-half (1/2) of the area assessed for the cost of
the project did not file written protests against the said proposed improvements
and acquisition where appropriate, and this legislative body did, after providing
a full hearing, overrule and deny all protests and objections; and,
WHEREAS, this legislative body is now satisfied with the assessment and all
matters contained in "the "Report" as now updated and submitted.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
I~:>
Resolution No. 16382
Page 2
SECTION 1.
SECTION 11.
SECTION II I.
SECTION IV.
SECTION V.
RECITALS
That the above recitals are all true and correct.
PROTESTS
That all protests and objections of every kind and nature be,
and the same hereby are, overruled and denied, and it is
further determined that said protests and objections are made
by the owners of less than one-half (1/2) of the area property
to be assessed for said improvements within said Assessment
District.
BENEFITS RECEIVED
That it is hereby determined that all properties within the
boundari es of the Assessment Di stri ct recei ve a local and
direct benefit from the works of improvement as proposed for
said Assessment District, and it is hereby further determined
and declared that all assessable costs and expenses have been
apportioned and spread over the properties within the
boundaries of the Assessment District in direct proportion to
the benefits received thereby.
)
PUBLIC INTEREST AND CONVENIENCE
That the public interest and convenience require the proposed
improvements to be made, and therefore it is hereby ordered
that the work to be done and improvements to be made, together
with appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection
therewith, including acquisition where appropriate, in said
Assessment District, as set forth in the Resolution of
Intention previously adopted and as set forth in the "Report"
presented and considered, and as now submitted.
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENT
That the "Report", as now updated and submitted, consisting of
the assessment and diagram for the improvements, together with
appurtenances and appurtenant work in connection therewith,
including acquisition where appropriate, is hereby confirmed.
The assessments contained in the final Engineer's "Report" are
hereby levied and approved as follows:
/0-(,
SECTION VI.
SECTION VII.
SECTION VII I.
Resolution No. 16382
Page 3
A. The final assessments to represent the costs and
expenses to finance the public works of improvements, as
authorized for these proceedings.
B. The annual assessment to pay for administrative costs in
an amount not to exceed the maximum annual assessment as
set forth in said "Report".
RECORDATION OF ASSESSMENT
That the Ci ty C1 erk shall forthwi th deliver to the
Superintendent of Streets the said assessment, together with
the di agram attached thereto and made a part thereof, as
confirmed, with his certificate of such confirmation attached
and the date thereof; and that said Superintendent of Streets
shall then immediately record said diagram and assessment in
his office in a suitable book to be kept for that purpose and
attach thereto his certificate of the date of such recording.
COUNTY RECORDER NOTICE
Upon confirmation of the assessments and recordation of the
assessment roll and diagram, a certified copy of the
assessment diagram shall be immediately filed in the Office of
the County Recorder. Immediately thereafter, a copy of the
notice of assessment shall be recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder in the manner and form as set forth by law and
specifically Section 3114 of the Streets and Highways Code of
the State of California.
MAILED NOTICE
That said City Clerk, upon the recording of said diagram and
assessment, shall mail to each owner of real property within
the Assessment District at his last known address, as the same
appears on the tax rolls of the County or on file in the
Offi ce of the Ci ty C1 erk, or to both addresses if sai d address
is not the same, or to General Delivery when no address so
, appears, a statement containing a designation by street number
or other description of the property assessed sufficient to
enab 1 e the owner to i denti fy the same, the amount of the
assessment, the time and place of payment thereof, the effect
of failure to pay within such time, and a statement of the
fact that bonds will be issued on unpaid assessments pursuant
to the "Improvement Bond Act of,1915".
/p-?
Resolution No. 16382
Page 4
SECTION IX.
SECTION X.
SECTION XI.
PUBLICATION
That said City Clerk shall also give notice by publishing a
copy of a notice of recording of assessment in the newspaper
previously selected to publish all notices as provided by law,
giving notice that said assessment has been recorded in the
Office of the Superintendent of Streets, and that all sums
assessed thereon are due and payable immediately, and that the
payment of said sums is to be made within thirty (30) days
after the date of recording the assessment, which date shall
be so stated in said notice, and of the fact that securities
will be issued upon unpaid assessments.
ASSESSMENT COLLECTION
The County Auditor is hereby authorized and directed, in
accordance with the provisions of Section 8682 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California, to enter into
his assessment roll on which property taxes will next become
due, opposite each lot or parcel of land affected, in a space
marked "public improvement assessment" or by other suitable
designation, the next and several installments of such
assessment coming due during the ensuing fiscal year covered
by the assessment roll and that said entry then shall be made
each year during the life of the bonds for the proceedings for
the above-referenced Assessment District. This authorization
is continual until all assessment obligations have been
discharged and the bond terminated.
As an alternate, and when determined to be in the best
interests for bondhol ders of the Assessment Di stri ct, thi s
legislative body may, by Resolution, designate an official
other than the County Tax Collector and/or other agent, to
collect and maintain records of the assessments, including a
procedure other than the normal property tax collection
procedure.
In accordance wi th the provi si ons of Secti on 8685 of the
Streets and Highways Code, if any lot or parcel of land
affected by any assessment is not separately assessed on the
tax roll so that the installment of the assessment to be
collected can be conveniently entered thereon, then the
Auditor shall enter on the roll' a description of the lot or
parcel affected, with the name of the owners, if known, but
otherwise the owners may be described as .unknown owners., and
extend the proper installment opposite the same.
)
1""'(
SECTION XII.
SECTION XIII.
Presented by
/
Resolution No. 16382
Page 5
ASSESSMENT VERIFICATION STATEMENT
The County Auditor shall, within 90 days after any special
assessment installment becomes delinquent, render and submit
a detailed report showing the amounts of the installments,
interest, penalties and percentages so collected, for the
preceding term and installment date, and from what property
co 11 ected, and further i denti fy any properties whi ch are
delinquent and the amount and length of time for said
delinquency, and further set forth a statement of percentages
retained for the expenses of making such collections. This
request is specifically made to be authorization of Section
8683 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
Ca 1i forni a.
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FUNDS
The Treasurer is hereby authorized at this time, if not
previously done, to establish the following funds as necessary
for the payment of costs and expenses and administration of
the proceedings for this Assessment District: '
A. IMPROVEMENT FUND: All monies received from cash
collection, proceeds from the sale of bonds and
applicable contributions shall be placed into the
Improvement Fund.
B. RESERVE FUND: All monies as designated to assist in
the payment of delinquencies shall be placed into the
Reserve Fund.
C. REDEMPTION FUND: All monies received from the payment
of assessments shall be placed in the Redemption Fund.
For particulars as to the administration and handling of the
Funds, the specific terms and conditions shall be set forth in
the Bond Indenture and approved through the Resolution
Authorizing the Issuance of Bonds.
,
J hn P. Lippit
irector of Public Works
ruce H. Boogaar
Ci ty Attorney
/ ~ "r;
Resolution No. 16382
Page 6
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 22nd day of October, 1991, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Grasser Horton, Malcolm, Moore, Nader
Rindone
NOES: Councilmember: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
~/l~
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
~j;J t ~~/11l1
Beverly ~~ Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA i
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A.Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16382 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 22nd day of October, 1991.
Executed this 22nd day of October, 1991.
/0-/0
JUL 17 '92 09:32 BALWIII CO. 61'9 25'9 024200000000
P.2
THE CITY OF CHUU VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Stl"tement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contrnl,:tor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
The Baldwin Company
F. Project., Inc.
...
..
3.
4.
5.
(l.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owninS more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the pannership.
PH proiect., Inc.
If any person identified pursuant to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
Ha,'e you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City stafr,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past rwelve months? Yes
,",0 ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
Please identify each nnd every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City .in this matter.
Mr. Denn1s Doucette
Ms. Claudia Trolsl - Baldwln J..,u\-r., :1It(Wi\!\i) t1"AHILTen
MS. IHlzaOeth Long - l:\",lawlll & 3CIUf'3
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, conlributed mOre than $1,000 to u
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period'! Yes _ No...lL II yes, sttltc which
Councihnember( s):
r\"r", '" is ,jcfim.'<.f as: "All,\' illdi,'idluiJ. fin", cu."nrlJu..r~lt;p. juilJ/l'('''''''(,. tlssodmioll, soc;ol club. frntt'nlnl o'Km1izmion. (Or/)t)ft/l;rm.
('''UII/I', InlSl. IrCt'j"t'r. ~-:mdi'''lc. this m,d Imy mlle'r C(JtII''.\~ chy lIlII! COWHI)~ til)'. mtmicipnlil)'. ,listriCI Or ol/It:r I'<Jlilicnl JIII)(/i\'i~i{)lI,
. or (III)' lJlllrr .,"'oup or comhi"lIlioll "cling liS {I w,it,.
(l'OTE: Atwell mJdltlonal p~g~'$ us ncee","')')
Dllle: 'I ~ L~ - '7 "-
~\~~
Signature of contractor/applicant
Claudia Troisi/The Baldwin Company
Prim or Iype lIame of rol1lraclllr::lI~plil'alll
!1(''\I''~'\I; It ,lu 'JIl!
~ .\.' . '\';):~C'I.()$J'"TXTI
!()-j /
~ ...,. .". .,
MFS
AMENDED FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
JULY 1992
PREPARED BY
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
42217 Rio Nedo, Second Floor
Temecula, CA 92590
(714) 699-3990
FAX: (714) 699-3460
3727 Buchanan, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94123
(415) 441-3550
FAX: (415) 441-1401
Jv - ) /
AMENDED FINAL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY ........................................... 1
ENGINEER'S REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
PART I - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ......................... 5
PART II - CONSTRUCTION COSTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
PART III - ASSESSMENT ROLL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 30
PART IV - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ............................ 41
PART V - DESCRIPTION OF WORK ............................ 42
APPENDIX ................................................... 46
) V;-/d.-
PROJECT SUMMARY
Date
Adopt Boundary Map
Resolution of Intention
Presentation of Confirmed
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing
Confirmation of Assessments
September 17, 1991
September 17, 1991
October 22, 1991
October 22, 1991
October 22, 1991
The Assessment District is for the purpose of acquiring certain public improvements
under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The General administration of this District
will be undertaken by the City of Chula Vista and all official actions will be made by the
City Council.
The Baldwin Company has previously submitted a tentative subdivision map known
as Salt Creek I, Chula Vista Tract 89-09 for 130 acres located at the northeasterly and
southeasterly quadrants of East "H" Street and the proposed State Route 125.
A Final Environmental Impact Report for the development, EIR 89-9, has been
processed and approved by the City Council. Additionally, the City Council has approved
the tentative subdivision map for Salt Creek I, Chula Vista Tract 89-9 for which Maps
12827, 12828 and 12829 have subsequently recorded.
Salt Creek I is included within the Development Impact Fee ("DIF"), Eastern Territory,
1991, which directs that specific infrastructure be provided to mitigate area deficiencies.
Those specific facilities built by Salt Creek I shall be noted within this report and identified
with Section "C" of the Cost Estimate Section. The DIF, as set by the DIF Report per
Residential Category, shall be incorporated and additive to the final assessment district
lien. For this district, the DIF Facilities to be incorporated are those directly related to the
grading, street improvement and landscaping of East "H" Street from East Lake Drive to
Mt. Miguel.
The cost of the acquisition of these improvements and incidentals and the DIF is
assigned to every parcel of land within the District that has received an improvement and
2is benefitted by the improvement. The level of benefit varies according to land use and
utilization of the improvements funded.
Amended
Confirmed Final
Acquisition Construction Cost $4,251,556.86 $3,786,962.77
Less Developer Contribution (615,955.89) (183,577.41)
Incidental Expenses 670,562.38 614,593.46
Cost of Issuance 820,221.59 575,178.94
Balance to Assessment $5,126,384.94 $4,793,157.76
Additional information may be obtained by contacting the office of the Public Works
Director, John P. Lippitt.
1 /tJ-)5
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 10204 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division
12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with
the Resolution of Intention No. 16343, adopted by the City Council of the
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(hereinafter referred to as the "CITY"), in connection with the proceedings for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
SALT CREEK I
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"), I, John P. Lippitt submit herewith
the Report for the Assessment District, consisting of five (5) parts as follows:
PART I
Plans and specifications for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
PART 1\
The actual cost of the improvements to be acquired, including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2
/0-) Lf
PART III
A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the
improvements upon the several subdivisions of land within the assessment district, in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, from said
improvements, is presented upon the assessment roll filed as a part of this report.
PART IV
A Diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries of the subdivision
of land within said assessment district, as the legal parcels existed at the time of the
passage of the Resolution of Intention, is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
PART V
Description of the work for the improvements are filed herewith and made a part
hereof. Description of all rights-of-way, easements and lands to be acquired, if necessary,
is set forth on the lists thereof and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
This Preliminary Report dated this 17 day of S..e;d-.
, 1991.
~/2:~
I John P. Up pi
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
This Final Report dated this ~ t- day of O'J- ,1991.
~I ;l~
r-:hn P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
3
. --
J [J-/>
This Amended Final Report dated this _ day of
. 1992.
John P. Lippitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
4
/ tJ-- J /;7
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART I - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
5
/ l) -J 7
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - CONSmUCTlON COSTS
SECTION A.
PROJECT NO.1:
PROJECT NO.2:
PROJECT NO.3:
PROJECT NO.4:
PROJECT NO.5:
PROJECT NO.6:
PROJECT NO.7:
PROJECT NO.8:
SECTION B.
SECTION C.
AMENDED FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
PROJECT GRADING
EAST"H" STREET
STATE ROUTE 125 (SR 125)
WATER SYSTEM
RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
SEWER SYSTEM
OFFSITE SEWER - PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM DIF
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
BOND COSTS
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT
6
It) -j ~
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.1: GRADING
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED MODIFIED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT" DIF
1 EAST"H" STREET 273,628.00 273,628.00 119,532.00 119,532.00
2 PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 254,230.00 254,230.00 111,058.00 0.00
3 MT. MIGUEL ROAD 164,616.00 164.616.00 71.911.20 0.00
PROJECT NO.1 TOTAL $ 692,474.00 692,474.00 302,501.20 119,532.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.1 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
EAST"H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
MT. MIGUEL RD
COST
119,532.00
111,058.00
71.911.20
ALLOCATION
(DIF)
50.00%
100.00%
AD COST
(DIF)
55,529.00
71.911.20
302,501.20
127,440.20
"Final Costs Modified Assessment
after confirmation.
7
/!J - /1
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
AC PAVING
MOBILlZATION/
DEMOLlZATION 23,000.00 23,000.00 23,000.00
2 STRIPING AND SIGNAGE 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00
3 STREET SURVEY MONUMENTS 2,530.00 2,530.00 2,530.00
4 TRENCH SHORING 2.00 2.00 2.00
5 SUPPLY BONDS 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
6 ACP 5"/16" AB (E.L. TO 125) 169,884.00 149,227.65 149,227.65
7 ACP ADDITIONAL 1/2" 240.00 0.00 0.00
8 CAB ADDITIONAL 1 /2" 140.00 0.00 0.00
9 ACP - 5/6 (125 TO MT MIG) 224,523.00 220,673.70 220,673.70
10 BUILD CHOKERS 0.00 17,061.06 17,061.06
11 ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION 0.00 31,466.89 31 ,466.89
12 ADDITIONAL AB 0.00 363,360.99 363,360.99
13 GUARD RAILS 0.00 7,700.44 7,700.44 7,700.44
14 TRAFFIC SIGNS 0.00 2,858.30 2,858.30 2,858.30
451,319.00 415,319.00 848,881.03 848,881.03
SIDEWALK/CURB & GUTTER
1 6" TYPE G CURB & GUTTER 49,072.50 49,072.50 47,351.25 47,351.25
2 6" TYPE B-1 CURB 38,115.00 38,115.00 36,823.50 36,823.50
3 6" TYPE A AC BERM 3,450.00 3,450.00 4,508.00 4,508.00
4 PEDESTRIAN RAMP 882.00 882.00 442.00 442.00
5 PCC SIDEWALK PAVING 60,217.50 57,605.75 57,605.75
6 PCC MEDIAN & MAl NT APRON 68,378.30 60,141.21 60,141.20
7 1" DEEP CONCRETE MOW STRIP 2,798.60 2,393.90 2,393.90
8 DEEP EDGE OF MEDIAN PLANTER 5,016.00 3,162.00 3,162.00
9 PCC DRIVEWAY 8,432.00 0.00 0.00
10 6" DEEP PCC SIDEWALK 850.00 1,100.00 1,100.00
11 GRASS CRETE PAVING 15,491.00 14,896.00 14,896.00
252,702.90 228,423.60 228,423,60
8
/ f/Z..){)
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
JOINT TRENCH
1 ELEC/GASjTELEPHONE/CABLE 95,000.00 95,000.00 87,829.00 0.00
2 ELEC/GASjTELEPHONE/CABLE 60,000.00 60,000.00 78,401.00 0.00
3 ADDITIONAL IRRIGATIONjT.S.
& GAS WORK (C.O. #5) 0.00 0.00 9,732.00 0.00
4 69IWA CROSSING 0.00 0.00 21,617.41 0.00
155,000.00 155,000.00 197,579.61 0.00
WALLS/FENCING
1 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,320.00 7,320.00 7,320.00 7,320.00
2 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00
3 WROUGHT IRON FENCING 6,228.00 6,228.00 6,228.00 0.00
4 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 1 19,000.00 19,000.00 19.000.00 0.00
5 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2 27,590.00 27,590.00 27,590.00 0.00
6 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2A 37,324.00 37,324.00 37,324.00 0.00
7 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 4 104,490.00 104,490.00 91,041.00 0.00
8 BLOCK COLUMN/ANTI-GRAFFITI 11,220.00 11,220.00 11,220.00 0.00
9 SOUND WALL CHANGES 0.00 1,800.00 0.00
220,612.00 220,612.00 211,963.00 14,760.00
STREET LIGHTS
1 STREET LIGHT 34,200.00 34,200.00 34,200.00 34,200.00
2 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 6,100.00 6,100.00 6,100.00 6,100.00
3 STREET LIGHT 26,000.00 26,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
4 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 2,800.00 2,800.00 2,800.00
69,100.00 69,100.00 65,100.00 65,100.00
RETAINING WALLS
WALL B 0.00 30,000.00 6,483.75 6,483.75
30,000.00 30,000.00 6,483.75 6,483.75
9 )C)c2 /
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONrD:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
LANDSCAPE BETWEEN EASTLAKE DRIVE & SR 125
1 SUPPLY BONDS 12,050.00 12,050.00 12,050.00
2 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 77,004.00 68,800.16 68,800.16
3 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 5,589.00 5,589.00 5,589.00
4 1 GALLON SHRUB 6,220.00 5,720.00 5,720.00
5 5 GALLON SHRUB 11,388.00 10,332.00 10,332.00
6 15 GALLON SHRUB 10,868.00 10,868.00 0.00 0.00
7 GROUND COVER 7,864.00 7,864.00 7,864.00
8 2" LAYER BARK MULCH 3,007.00 2,436.60 2,436.60
9 TREE STAKING COMP 1,235.00 1,085.00 1,085.00
10 TREE DRAINAGE COMP 2,470.00 2,170.00 2,170.00
11 HYDRO SEED 195.00 195.00 195.00
12 FLAT PLANTS COMP 146.25 146.25 146.25
13 36" INSIDE DIA. X 18" HT
PRECASE CONC TREEWELL 20,995.00 20,995.00 20,995.00
14 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1,863.00 1,863.00 1,663.00
15 TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
16 IRR CHANGES FOR OPEN SPACE
DIST APPROVED BOUNDARIES 0.00 19,952.50 0.00
17 IRR CONVERSION - SOUTH SIDE 0.00 12,820.00 0.00
18 IRR CONVERSION - NORTH SIDE 0.00 6,375.00 0.00
165,894.25 183,393.51 144,246.01
10
/0 --dd-
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
LANDSCAPE FROM SR 125 TO MT MIGUEL RD
1 SLUMP BLOCK SIGN WALL 3,150.00 3,150.00 0.00 0.00
2 4" SLUMP BLOCK PLASTER 1,600.00 1,600.00 0.00 0.00
3 SIGN PLANTER WALL 19,425.00 19,425.00 0.00 0.00
4 4" ASPHALT PAVING 11,250.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 0.00
5 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 43,365.90 43,365.90 43,365.90 43,365.90
6 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 6,500.39 6,500.39 6,500.39 6,500.39
7 1 GALLON SHRUB 2,944.00 2,944.00 2,944.00 2,944.00
8 5 GALLON SHRUB 3,840.00 3,840.00 3,840.00 3,840.00
9 15 GALLON SHRUB 1,188.00 1,188.00 1,188.00 1,188.00
10 15 GALLON TREE 6,204.00 6,204.00 6,204.00 6,204.00
11 48" BOX TREE 11,700.00 11,700.00 11,700.00 0.00
12 6" POTTED PLANTS 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00
13 FLAT PLANTS AT CRIB 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
14 HYDRO SEED #4 3,064.46 3,064.46 3,064.46 3,065.00
15 FLAT PLANTS COMP 2,507.29 2,507.29 2,507.29 2,507.00
16 36" INSIDE DIA X 18" HT
PRECASE CONC TREEWELL 10,540.00 10,540.00 10,540.00 2,998. 71
17 TREE DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1,240.00 1,240.00 1,240.00 0.00
18 TREE STAKING COMP 705.00 705.00 705.00 0.00
19 SHREDDED BARK MULCH 2,852.31 2,852.31 2,852.31 0.00
20 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 2,166.80 2,166.80 2,166.80 0.00
21 380' OF 21/2" MAINLINE
CHANGED TO 3" 0.00 0.00 380.00 380.00
136,893.15 136,893.15 113,098.15 75,643.00
11
J!J~c-l:J
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET. CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
EROSION CONTROL FROM SR 125 TO MT MIGUEL RD
1 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 122,614.22 122,614.22 122,614.22 0.00
2 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 16,395.40 16,395.40 16,395.40 0.00
3 1 GALLON SHRUB 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00 0.00
4 1 GALLON TREE 1,732.00 1,732.00 1,732.00 0.00
5 15 GALLON TREE 1,408.00 1,408.00 1,408.00 0.00
6 HYDROSEED MIX #1 3,295.50 3,295.50 3,295.50 0.00
7 HYDRO SEED MIX #2 11,292.55 11,292.55 11,292.55 0.00
8 HYDROSEED MIX #3 2,293.61 2,293.61 2,293.61 0.00
9 HYDROSEED MIX #4 2,255.00 2,255.00 2,255.00 0.00
10 HYDROSEED MIX #5 202.38 202.38 202.38 202.3110
11 TREE STAKING 2,305.00 2,305.00 2,305.00 0.00
12 #2 FLAT PLANTS 1,845.00 1,845.00 1,845.00 0.00
13 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 7,869.79 7,869.79 7,869.79 0.00
180,948.45 180,948.45 180,948.45 0.00
PROJECT NO.2 TOTAL 1,662,469.75 1,662,469.75 2,035,871.10 1,383,537.39
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.2 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
AC PAVING 848,881.03 (DIF) (DIF)
SIDEWALK/CURB & GUTTER 228,423.60 (DIF) (DIF)
JOINT TRENCH 197,579.61 100% 197,579.61
WALLS & FENCING 211,963.00 93.31% 197,782.68
STREET LIGHTS 65,100.00 (DIF) (DIF)
RETAINING WALLS 6,483.75 (DIF) (DIF)
LANDSCAPE/EROSION CONTROL 477,440.11 51.10% 243.971.90
2,035,871.10 639,334.19
12
J(Jr..2L/'
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
ROUGH GRADING
EROSION CONTROL
EROSION CONTROL 5.000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00
5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00
FENCING/WALLS
1 2' BLOCK 3' W.I 67,500.00 67,500.00 0.00 0.00
2 3' BLOCK 3 GLASS 49,500.00 49.500.00 0.00 0.00
3 6' - 9' BLOCK 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00
4 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 3,950.00 0.00
5 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2AfW-4 9' 6" HT 0.00 0.00 15,002.76 0.00
6 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2/W-4 9' 0" HT 0.00 0.00 13,724.04 0.00
7 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
3/W-4 7' 0" HT 0.00 0.00 15,723.48 0.00
8 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2AfW-4 10' 6" HT 0.00 0.00 26,687.28 0.00
9 SLUMP BLOCK COLUMNS PER
DETAIL FfW-3 0.00 0.00 5,175.00 0.00
267,000.00 267,000.00 79,812.56 0.00
13
---
/O~02.7
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125 - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
LANDSCAPE
1 IRRIGATION 44,190.00 44,190.00 40,574.00 0.00
2 LANDSCAPE 24,356.00 24,356.00 40,925.00 0.00
3 HYDROSEED 22,541.00 22,541.00 22,541.00 0.00
4 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 5,914.00 5,914.00 5,914.00 0.00
97,001.00 97,001.00 109,954.00 0.00
PROJECT NO.3 TOTAL: 369,001.00 369,001.00 189,766.56 0.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.3 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
ROUGH GRADING 0.00 0.00% 0.00
FENCINGjWALLS 79,812.56 100% 79,812.56
LANDSCAPE 109.954.00 0.00% 0.00
189,766.58 79,812.56
14
/0 --:;20
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
H STREET
1 12" ACP 60,000.00 60,000.00 53,768.00
2 16" ACP 85,510.00 85,510.00 91,390.00
3 12" GATE VALVE 7,200.00 7,200.00 6,000.00
4 16" GATE VALVE 2,500.00 2,500.00 19,250.00
5 CONNECT #1 TO EXIST. 12" 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
6 CONNECT #2 TO EXIST. 16" 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
7 1" AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY 4,500.00 4,500.00 6,000.00
8 2" AUR-VAC ASSEMBLY 8,500.00 8,500.00 20,400.00
9 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 13,200.00 13,200.00 13,200.00
10 12" ACP WATER MAIN 10,695.00 10,695.00 11,408.00
11 16" ACP WATER MAIN 58,140.00 58,140.00 63,004.00
12 2" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 4,800.00 4,800.00 10,800.00
13 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 9,600.00 9,600.00 8,000.00
14 WATER CONNECT - H ST & MT MIG 0.00 0.00 3,675.33
15 RESTOCKING FEE 0.00 0.00 14,342.09
16 ADDTN'L COST LOCATE WATER 0.00 0.00 501.03
17 VALVE COVERS, CHANGE CO #10 0.00 0.00 1,074.29
270,245.00 270,245.00 328,412.74
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 12" ACP CL150 44,960.00 44,960.00 19,640.00
2 6" FIRE HYDRANT 6,300.00 6,300.00 6,300.00
3 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE 900.00 900.00 900.00
4 10" ACP CL150 0.00 0.00 1,376.00
5 12" ACP CL200 0.00 0.00 27,140.00
6 ENCASEMENT 0.00 0.00 286.00
7 10" GATE VALVE 0.00 0.00 750.00
8 12" GATE VALVE 0.00 0.00 4,500.00
9 2" BLOW OFF 0.00 0.00 2,550.00
10 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 1,800.00
11 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 4,800.00
52,160.00 52,160.00 70,042.00
15 ) {)-;;< 7
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
MT MIGUEL RD
1 16" ACP CL150 47,544.00 47,544.00 0.00
2 2" BLOW OFF 850.00 850.00 0.00
3 4" BLOW OFF 1,400.00 1,400.00 5,000.00
4 6" PRESSURE REDUCING
STATION (INCL ELEC) 34,500.00 34,500.00 34,500.00
5 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 0.00 0.00 31,000.00
6 16" ACP Cl200 0.00 0.00 64,645.00
7 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,600.00
8 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,200.00
9 CONNECT TO EXIST WATER 0.00 0.00 2,000.00
10 16" Cl250 FLANGED VALVES 0.00 0.00 9,400.00
84,294.00 84,294.00 153,345.00
UNIT 1
1 10" ACP CL150 24,192.00 24,192.00 30,432.00
2 12" ACP CL150 3,920.00 3,920.00 3,920.00
3 6" FIRE HYDRANT 8,400.00 8,400.00 12,600.00
4 10" gate valve 2,250.00 2,250.00 5,250.00
5 1" air release 1 ,200.00 1 ,200.00 7,200.00
6 12" gate valve 0.00 0.00 1 ,800.00
39,962.00 39,962.00 61,202.00
UNIT 2
1 10" ACP CL150 9,584.00 9,584.00 12,176.00
2 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 1,800.00
3 10" GATE VALVE 3,750.00 3,750.00 4,500.00
4 CONNECT TO EXISTING 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00
5 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 8,400.00
6 MOBILIZATION 0.00 0.00 4,180.00
7 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 500.00
14,934.00 14,934.00 31,556.00
16
/O~d?5
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM - CONT'O:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
UNIT 3
1 10" ACP CL150 11,120.00 11,120.00 11,120.00
2 12" ACP CL150 9,560.00 9,560.00 9,560.00
3 6" FIRE HYDRANT 4,200.00 4,200.00 4,200.00
4 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 600.00
5 10" GATE VALVE 5,250.00 5,250.00 5,250.00
6 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE 900.00 900.00 900.00
7 1" AIR RELEASE 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00
8 CONNECT TO EXIST WATER 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
34,830.00 34,830.00 34,830.00
PROJECT NO.4 TOTAL: 496,425.00 679,387.74
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.4 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST H STREET 328,412.74 37% 121,512.71
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 70,042.00 36% 25,215.12
MT MIGUEL ROAD 153,345.00 33% 50,603.85
UNIT 1 61,202.00 70% 42.841.40
UNIT 2 31,556.00 70% 22.089.20
UNIT 3 34.839.00 70% 24.381.00
679,384.74 286,643.28
17
Ie ~ (
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
H STREET
1 16" ACP 86,040.00 86,040.00 86,040.00
2 16" GATE VALVE 7,500.00 7,500.00 11,550.00
3 6' RP BACKFLOW 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00
4 2' AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY 3,400.00 3,400.00 3,400.00
5 4' BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
6 2" WATER SERVICE 9,900.00 9,900.00 9,900.00
7 16' ACP RECL WATER LINE 57,905.00 57,905.00 59,200.00
8 16" GATE VALVE 5,200.00 5,200.00 7,700.00
9 6" RP BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 6,400.00 6,400.00 0.00
185,945.00 185,945.00 187,390.00
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 16" ACP CL200 76,825.00 76,825.00 76,475.00
2 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 1,200.00 1,200.00 14,000.00
3 2" AIR VAC ASSEMBLY 1,800.00 1,800.00 1,800.00
4 2" WATER SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
5 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,600.00
6 4" BLOW OFF 0.00 0.00 9,300.00
80,825.00 80,825.00 106,175.00
18 )&--30
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
MT MIGUEL ROAD
1 16" ACP Cl200 26,215.00 26,215.00 36,750.00
2 8" ACP Cl200 19,908.00 19,908.00 12,896.00
3 4" BLOW OFF 3,100.00 3,100.00 3,100.00
4 1" AIR RELEASE 1,200.00 1,200.00 2,000.00
5 2" AIR VAC ASSEMBLY 3,600.00 3,600.00 0.00
6 2" WATER SERVICE 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00
7 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 0.00 0.00 7,000.00
8 CONNECT TO RECLAIMED 0.00 0.00 2,000.00
9 MOBILIZATION 0.00 0.00 5,000.00
10 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 1,500.00
11 CONNECT TO EXIST RECL WATER
(STA 41 + 46.17) 0.00 0.00 1,000.00
57,023.00 57,023.00 71,246.00
UNIT 1
1 8" ACP Cl2009 8,022.00 4,305.00
2 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 1,200.00
3 2" BLOW OFF 850.00 850.00 850.00
4 2" WATER SERVICE 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00
5 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 1,000.00
11,472.00 11,472.00 11,355.00
PROJECT NO.5 TOTAL 335,165.00 335,165.00 376,166.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.5 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST H STREET 187,390.00 60% 112,434.00
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 106,175.00 60% 63,705.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD 71,246.00 82% 58,421 .72
UNIT 1 11.355.00 100% 11.355.00
376,166.00 245,915.72
19 ) [)~..3 /
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
PROCTOR VALLEY RD
1 10" PVC SEWER 3,468.00 3,468.00 3,944.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00
6,468.00 6,468.00 5,444.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD
1 10" PVC SEWER 18,530.00 18,530.00 18,725.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 10,500.00 10,500.00 12,000.00
3 SEWER CONNECTION 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
4 CONNECT TO EXIST SEWER
(STA 39 + 80) 0.00 0.00 500.00
5 TRENCH SHORING 0.00 0.00 500.00
30,030.00 30,030.00 32,725.00
UNIT 1
1 10" PVC SEWER 34,714.00 34,714.00 37,536.00
2 SEWER MANHOLD 13,500.00 13,500.00 12,000.00
3 CUTOFF WALL '2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
50,614.00 50,614.00 51,936.00
PROJECT 6 TOTAL: 87,112.00 87,112.00 90,105.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.6 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 5,444.00 47% 2,558.68
MT MIGUEL ROAD 32,725.00 60% 19,635.00
UNIT 1 51.936.00 42% 21,813.12
90,105.00 44,006.80
20 )00d-.-
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.7: PROCTOR VALLEY OFFSITE SEWER
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
1 MOBILIZATION 40,000.00 40,000.00 40,000.00
2 SUPPLY BONDS 6,500.00 6,500.00 6,500.00
3 15" PVC SEWER 110,600.00 110,600.00 88,200.00
4 12" PVC SEWER 33,980.00 33,980.00 33,880.00
5 10" PVC SEWER 82,460.00 82,460.00 82,460.00
6 SEWER MANHOLD 46,400.00 46,400.00 48,000.00
7 CONNECT TO EXISTING 500.00 500.00 500.00
8 CONNECT TO EXISTING 500.00 500.00 500.00
9 CONCRETE CRADLE 7,500.00 7,500.00 3,900.00
10 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00
11 JACKED STEEL CASING 23,744.00 23,744.00 23,744.00
12 TRENCH SHORING 17,725.00 17,725.00 17,725.00
13 16" C-905 PVC SEWER PIPE 0.00 0.00 24,400.00
14 SEWER METERING 0.00 0.00 30,213.53
15 COREDRILL MANHOLE AND
CONDUIT (AW.) 0.00 0.00 460.00
PROJECT NO.7 TOTAL: 375,309.00 375,309.00 405,882.53
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.7 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION
AD COST
OFFSITE SEWER
405,882.53
26%
105,529.46
405,882.53
105,529.46
21
/tJ-3-;5
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
PART \I - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
EAST H STREET
1 18" RCP 12,900.00 12,900.00 13,410.00 0.00
2 24" RCP 10,575.00 10,575.00 10,575.00 0.00
3 36" RCP 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,320.00 4,320.00
4 42" RCP 31,590.00 31,590.00 31,590.00 31,590.00
5 48" RCP 48,760.00 48,760.00 48,336.00 48,336.00
6 CONC ENERGY DISSIPATOR 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
7 WING TYPE HEADWAll 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
8 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET 23,800.00 23,800.00 23,800.00 23,800.00
9 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET W/lUG 7,200.00 7,200.00 7,200.00 7,200.00
10 TYPE A-4 ClEANOUT 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
11 TYPE A-5 CLEAN OUT 9,300.00 9,300.00 12,400.00
12 TYPE A-8 MOD ClEANOUT 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
13 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
14 MOD TYPE F CATCH BASIN 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,140.00
15 DRAINAGE BASIN 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,333.16
16 TYPE A-5 ClEANOUT TO GRADE 880.00 880.00
17 BROOKS 12" X 12" CATCH BASIN 10,920.00 7,350.00
18 6" PVC 10,010.00 0.00
19 CONNECT TO 48" RCP ClEANOUT 680.00 680.00
20 CONNECT TO EXIST 48" RCP 326.00 326.00
21 18" RCP 4,805.00 4,805.00
22 14" RCP 1,710.00 2,288.07
23 36" RCP 94,185.00 94,185.00
24 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET 10,800.00 10,800.00
25 TYPE A-4 ClEANOUT 11,600.00 11,600.00
26 CURB OUTLET TYPE 0-25 4,000.00 0.00
27 BRICK & MORTAR PLUG 10.00 10.00
28 6"PVC 7,350.00 0.00
29 CONNECT 36" RCP TO ClEANOUT 500.00 0.00
30 INSTAll MEDIAN DRAIN 0.00 64,099.49 64,099.49
31 INSTAll OF FRENCH DRAIN 0.00 36,385.83 36,385.83
347,901.00 426,692.55 252,071.32
22
/vr ;>1
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM" CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 18' RCP 13500 5,504.00 5,504.00 5,504.00
2 36' RCP 13500 5,546.00 5,546.00 5,546.00
3 42' RCP 13500 4,380.00 4,380.00 4,380.00
4 60" RCP 13500 147,290.00 147,290.00 147,290.00
5 60" RCP 16500 41,658.00 41,658.00 41,658.00
6 66" RCP 116,358.00 116,358.00 116,358.00
7 CONCRETE LUG 1,116.00 1,116.00 1,116.00
8 A-6 CLEAN OUT 2,900.00 2,900.00 2,900.00
9 A-7 CLEANOUT 9,120.00 9,120.00 9,120.00
10 SPECIAL CLEANOUT 7,300.00 7,300.00 10,200.00
11 11' B-1 INLET 4,150.00 4,150.00 4,150.00
12 13' 8-1 INLET 3,450.00 3,450.00 3,450.00
13 15' B-1 INLET 3,660.00 3,660.00 3,660.00
14 17' B-1 INLET 4,810.00 4,810.00 4,810.00
15 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00
16 WING HEADWALL 10,500.00 10,500.00 10,500.00
17 RIP RAP 5,900.00 5,900.00 5,900.00
18 A-6 CLEANOUT X=6 Y=7 8,900.00 8,900.00 8,900.00
19 a-7 CLEANOUT X=6 Y=7 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00
20 SPECIAL SLURRY FOR DOUBLE
66" SO 5,880.00 5,880.00 5,880.00
21 BLASTING 60,000.00 60,000.00 0.00
455,272.00 455,272.00 398,172.00
23
.,---
)(} ~;J3'
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
MT MIGUEL RD
1 18" RCP 13500 5,280.00 5,280.00 5,280.00
2 21" RCP 13500 2,808.00 2,808.00 2,808.00
3 24" RCP 13500 5,775.00 5,775.00 25,704.00
4 30" RCP 13500 3,975.00 3,975.00 3,975.00
5 36" RCP 13500 56,935.00 56,935.00 56,935.00
6 42" RCP 13500 56,648.00 56,648.00 56,648.00
7 A-4 CLEANOUT 20,320.00 20,320.00 20,320.00
8 5' B-1 INLET 2,650.00 2,650.00 2,650.00
9 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 4,700.00 4,700.00 4,700.00
10 WING HEAOWALL 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00
11 RIP RAP 1,900.00 1,900.00 1,900.00
12 CUT OFF WALL 2,750.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
13 DESILTER 4,725.00
14 A-5 CLEANOUT 5,550.00 5,550.00 5,550.00
15 A-5 CLEANOUT X=5 Y=8 4,450.00 4,450.00 4,450.00
181,966.00 177,241.00 197,170.00
UNIT 1
1 18" RCP 13500 11,040.00 11,040.00 11,040.00
2 42" RCP 13500 104,682.00 104,682.00 104,682.00
3 42" RCP 15000 7,656.00 7,656.00 7,656.00
4 48" RCP 13500 34,860.00 34,860.00 34,860.00
5 48" RCP 14000 17,181.00 17,181.00 17,181.00
6 CONCRETE LUG 1,860.00 1,860.00 1,860.00
7 A-5 CLEANOUT 24,975.00 24,975.00 24,975.00
8 27'B-l INLET 4,850.00 4,850.00 4,850.00
9 26' B-1 INLET 4,600.00 4,600.00 4,600.00
10 19' B-1 INLET 4,100.00 4,100.00 4,100.00
11 21' B-1 INLET 4,310.00 4,310.00 4,310.00
12 23' B-1 INLET 4,350.00 4,350.00 4,350.00
13 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 7,050.00 7,050.00 7,050.00
14 CUTOFF WALL 5,500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00
15 9' B-2 INLET 3,100.00 3,100.00 3,100.00
16 BLASTING/AOO'L BACKFILL 29,000.00 29,000.00 0.00
269,114.00 269,114.00 240,114.00
PROJECT NO.8 TOTAL 1,254,253.00 1,262,148.55 252,071.32
24
jo..-..-?b
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - CONT'D:
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.8 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST H STREET 426,692.55 56.25% 240,014.56
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 398,172.00 50% 199,086.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD 197,170.00 100% 197,170.00
UNIT 1 240.114.00 100% 240.114.00
1,262,148.55 876,384.56
25
)0-37
ACQUISITION ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
SALT CREEK I - CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS (CONTINUED)
A.D. 90-1 CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATION COST - SUMMARY
AD COST
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
PROJECT NO.1: GRADING 291,731.00 291.731.00 127,440.00 119.532.00
PROJECT NO.2: EAST H STREET 608,042.08 608,042.08 639,334.19 1,372,978.65
PROJECT NO.3: SR 125 LANDSCAPING 267,000.00 267,000.00 79,812.56 0.00
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM 209,393.47 209,393.47 286,643.28 0.00
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER 218,292.86 218,292.86 249,915.72 0.00
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM 42,315.84 42,315.84 44,006.80 0.00
PROJECT NO.7: OFFSITE SEWER SYSTEM 97,580.34 97,580.34 105,529.46 0.00
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 874,427.01 874,427.01 876,384.56 151,766.00
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST: 2,608,782.60 2,608,782.60 2,405,066.77 1,644.276.65
CONTINGENCY (10%) 260,878.26 260,878.26 0.00
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: 2,869,660.86 2,869.660.86 2,405,066.77
.PLUS TOTAL DIF ALLOWED: 1,326,816.00 1,381,816.00 1,381,896.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $4,196,476.86 4,251,476.86 3,786,962.77
26
) tJ ~3 :;('.
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $4,251,556.86 $3,786,962.71
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16,000.00 16,000.00
2 ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING 56,650.00 56,650.00
3 DESIGN ENGINEERING 65,000.00 85,876.54
4 UTILITY CONSULTANT 11,335.00 12,631.00
5 BOND COUNSEL 35,126.38 34,793.16
6 FINANCIAL CONSULTANT 63,000.00 63,000.00
7 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 29,641.00 31,757.00
8 SOILS ENGINEERING 44,111.00 35,939.00
9 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY/STAKE 63,886.00 77,868.41
10 PUBLIC AGENCY PROJECT MANAGE 45,700.00 35,200.00
11 DEVELOPMENT BOND PREMIUM 653.00 650.00
12 PERMIT FEES
OTAY WATER 23,700.00 23,700.00
SDG&E 20,000.00 20,000.00
S D COUNTY 1,319.00 15,477.35
CITY OF C V 135,000.00 45,310.00
13 PRINTING, ADVERTISING, POSTING 1,000.00 1,000.00
14 UTILITY FEE 144,790.00 145,900.00
LESS UTILITY REFUND (116,349.00) (116,349.00)
15 PRINTING OF BID DOCUMENTS 20,000.00 20,000.00
16 BOND PRINTING, SERVICING &
REGISTRATION 10,000.00 10,000.00
TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS $ 670,562.38 614,593.46
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION (388,024.21 ) (615,955.89) (183,577.41)
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION
& EXPENSES $4,306.163.35 $4,217,978.82
COSTS OF ISSUANCE
CAPITALIZED INTEREST
(SIX MOS. @ 8%) 215,609.68 205,055.40 0.00
BOND DISCOUNT (3%) (2%) 161,707.26 102,527.70 95,863.16
RESERVE FUNDS (10%) 539,024.21 512,638.49 479,315.78
SUBTOTAL COSTS OF ISSUANCE 820,221.59 575,178.94
TOTAL INCIDENTAL EXPENSES - BOND COSTS $1,193,765.36 $ 874,828.08 $1,006,194.99
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $5,390,424.22 $5,126,384.94 $4,793,157.76
27
)0,--3;
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
( THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK)
28
JO~J/tJ
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA. VISTA
SECTION "8"
MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2431 (amending Ordinance No. 2251), the Development
Impact Fee (DIF) as it relates to the funding of transportation facilities in the City's eastern
territories has been given a value per development type. Financial and engineering
studies, and the City's General Plan show that the transportation network in the Salt
Creek I area will be adversely impacted by new development unless new transportation
facilities are added to accommodate an increased traffic generation.
Mitigating facilities, as defined within the Eastern Area Development Impact Fee for
Streets, Final 1990 Revision, are being constructed within the Salt Creek I project area.
Only those eligible DIF facilities within Assessment District No. 90-1 and their respective
costs shall be included within the assignment of the final spread to the parcels within the
boundary of the District, the remainder goes to DIF credit.
A. CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
EAST "H" STREET:
Grading
Improvements
Storm Drain
Landscaping
Subtotal
$ 119,532.00
$ 1,163,648.38
$ 252,071.32
$ 219.889.01
$ 1,503,069.39
B. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
DIF PROGRAM SUPPORT (2%)
TOTAL
$ 27.637.92
$ 1,530,707.31
C. DISTRICT DlF GENERATION
166 SFR @ $3,060
216 TWH @ $2,448
141 COO @ $2,448
=
$ 507,960.00
$ 528,768.00
$ 345.168.00
=
=
MAXIMUM DIF
$ 1.381.896.00
BALANCE TO CREDIT
$ 148,811.31
29
/()~-!//
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913,
DIVISION 12 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODES
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PART 11/ - ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, on September 17, 1991, the City Council did, pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution of Intention No. 16343
for the acquisition of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and
appurtenant work in connection therewith in a special assessment district known and
designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(Hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the
appointed Superintendent of Streets to make and file a report consisting of the following:
1) Plans and Specifications;
2) Cost of Improvements;
3) A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of
improvement levied upon the parcels and lots of land within the boundaries
of the assessment district;
4) Assessment Diagram showing the assessment district and the subdivisions
of land contained herein;
5) A description of the public improvements to be acquired;
6) Assessment Engineer's Certificate verifying improvements.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as adopted by the
City Council.
30
J(J/J/ ~
NOW THEREFORE, I, John P. Lippitt, as appointed Superintendent of Streets, and
pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", do herein submit the following:
1) I, pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, have
assessed the costs and expenses of the works of improvement to be
performed in the Assessment District upon the parcels of land in the
Assessment District benefitted thereby in direct proportion and relation to
the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For
particulars of the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the
Assessment Diagram.
2) As required by law, a Diagram is herein included, showing the Assessment
District boundary, as well as the boundaries of the benefitting parcels within
the district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said
Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots
respectively have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in
said Assessment Roll.
3) The subdivisions and parcels of land and the numbers therein as shown on
the respective Assessments Diagram as included herein correspond with
the numbers as appearing on the Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that bonds will be issued in accordance with
Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Improvement Bond Act of 1915"), to represent all unpaid assessments and
the last installment of said bonds shall mature a maximum of TWENTY-FIVE
(25) YEARS from the day of next succeeding twelve
(12) months from their date. Said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to
exceed the current legal maximum of 12% per annum.
5) By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913", and by further direction and order of the City Council, I hereby make
the following assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of
improvement for the Assessment District based on the costs and expenses
as set forth below:
Acquisition Construction Cost
Less Developer Contribution
Incidental Expenses
Costs of Issuance
Balance to Assessment
Confirmed
$ 4,251,556.86
< 615,955.89 >
670,562.38
820.221.59
$ 5,126,384.94
Amended Final
$ 3,786,962.77
< 183,577.41 >
614,593.46
575.178.94
$ 4,793,157.76
31
ItJ'~~3
6) In addition to or as a part of the assessment lien levied against each parcel
of land within the Assessment District. each parcel of land shall also be
subject to an annual assessment to pay costs incurred by the City and not
- otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of
assessments or from the administration or registration of any bonds and/or
reserve or other related funds. TIle maximum amount of such annual
assessment upon each parcel of land shall not exceed 5% of the amount of
the annual assessment installment.
7) All costs and expenses of the works of improvement have been assessed to
all parcels of land within the Assessment District in a manner which is more
clearly defined in the "Method and Formula of Assessment Spread", which is
a part of this Assessment Roll.
TIlis preliminary report dated: s;.,f. ) 7
. 1991
By:
u/~
IJOhn P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of Califomia
TIlis final report dated: Oe:t ,1.1- , 1991
By:
.. .~
John P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
) v--1/t!
17-Jul-92 1
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 159538001 I LOT 1, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
2 159538002 ILOT 2, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 1 11,385.42 I
3 159538003 ILOT 3, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
4 159538004 I LOT 4, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
5 159538005 I LOT 5, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
6 159538006 I LOT 6, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
7 159538007 ILOT 7, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
8 159538008 ILOT 8, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
9 159538009 I LOT 9, MAP 1282791-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
10 159538010 I LOT 10, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
11 159538011 ILOT 11, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
12 159538012 ILOT 12, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
13 159538013 ILOT 13, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
14 159538014 I LOT 14, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
15 159538015 1 LOT 15, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
16 159538016 ILOT 16, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
17 159538017 ILOT 17, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
18 159538018 I LOT 18, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
19 159538019 I LOT 19, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
20 159538020 I LOT 20, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
21 159538021 I LOT 21, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
22 159538022 ILOT 22, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42 I
23 159538023 ILOT 23, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
24 159538024 I LOT 24, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
25 159538025 I LOT 25, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
26 159538026 I LOT 26, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
27 [59538027 I LOT 27, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
28 159538028 I LOT 28, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
29 159538029 ILOT 29, MAP 12B27 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
30 159538030 I LOT 30, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
31 159538031 I LOT 31, MAP 1282791-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
32 159538032 I LOT 32, MAP 1282791-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
33 159538033 I LOT 33, MAP 12B27 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
34 159538034 ILOT 34, MAP 12827 91-292094 [FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
35 159538035 ILOT 35, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
36 159538036 I LOT 36, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
37 159538037 I LOT 37, MAP 1282791-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
38 159538038 I LOT 38, MAP 1282791-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
39 I 5953B039 ILOT 39, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
40 159538040 ILOT 40, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC CIO THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 I 11,385.42
41 159538041 I LOT 41, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 1 11,385.42
/Vr-t)~
17-Jul-92 2
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONF lRMED
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
=======================================================================================================--============
42 159538042 1 LOT 42, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
43 159538043 1 LOT 43, MAP 12827 91-292094 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
44 159538044 1 LOT 44, MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
45 159538045 1 LOT 45, MAP 12827 91-292094 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
46 159538046 ILOT 46, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
47 159538047 ILOT 47, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
48 159538048 ILOT 48, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
49 159538049 ILOT 49, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
50 159538050 ILOT 50, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALOWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
51 159538051 ILOT 51, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
52 159538101 I LOT 52, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
53 159538102 I LOT 53, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
54 159538103 I LOT 54, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
55 159538104 ILOT 55, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
56 159538105 I LOT 56, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
57 159538106 ILOT 57, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
58 159538107 1 LOT 58, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
59 159538108 ILOT 59, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
60 159538109 ILOT 60, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
61 159538110 ILOT 61, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
62 159538111 ILOT 62, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
63 159538112 ILOT 63, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,3B5.42 I
64 159538113 ILOT 64, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
65 159538114 ILOT 65, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
66 159538115 ILOT 66, MAP 12827 91-292094 fN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
67 159538116 ILOT 67, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
68 159538117 ILOT 68, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
69 159538118 ILOT 69, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
70 159538119 ILOT 70, MAP 12827 91-292094 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
71 159539001 ILOT 1, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
72 159539002 ILOT 2, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
73 159539003 ILOT 3, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
74 159539004 ILOT 4, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
75 159539005 ILOT 5, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
76 159539006 ILOT 6, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
77 159539007 ILOT 7, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
78 159539008 I LOT 8, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
79 159539009 I LOT 9, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
SO 159539010 I LOT 10, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
81 159539011 I LOT 11, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
/O~L/b
17-Jul-92 3
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
( SALT CREEK j)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
====================================================================================================================
82 159539012 ILOT 12, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
83 159539013 ILOT 13, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
84 159539014 I LOT 14, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
85 159539015 ILOT 15, MAP 12828 91-292095 fN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
86 159539016 ILOT 16, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN co. 13,049.61 11,385.42
87 159539017 1 LOT 17, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN co. 13,049.61 11,385.42
88 159539018 ILOT 18, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
89 159539019 ILOT 19, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN Co. 13,049.61 11,385.42
90 159539020 ILOT 20, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
91 159539021 LOT 21, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
92 159539022 LOT 22, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
93 159539023 LOT 23, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
94 159539024 LOT 24, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
95 159539025 LOT 25, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN co. 13,049.61 11,385.42
96 159539026 LOT 26, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
97 159539027 LOT 27, MAP 12828 91-292095 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN co. 13,049.61 11,385.42
98 159539028 LOT 28, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
99 159539029 LOT 29, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
100 159539030 LOT 30, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
101 159539031 LOT 31, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
102 159539032 LOT 32, MAP 12828 91-292095 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
103 159539033 LOT 33, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
104 159539034 LOT 34, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
105 159539035 LOT 35, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
106 159539036 LOT 36, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
107 159539037 1 LOT 37, MAP 12828 91-292095 1 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
108 159539038 1 LOT 38, MAP 12828 91-292095 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
109 159540001 1 LOT 1, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
110 159540002 1 LOT 2, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE 8ALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
111 159540003 1 LOT 3, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
112 159540004 I LOT 4, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
113 159540005 1 LOT 5, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
114 159540006 1 LOT 6, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
115 159540007 I LOT 7, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
116 159540008 I LOT 8, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
117 159540009 I LOT 9, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
118 159540010 1 LOT 10, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
119 159540011 1 LOT 11, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
120 159540012 1 LOT 12, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
121 159540013 1 LOT 13, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
)& ,17
17-Jul-92 4
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
==============================================-=====================================================================
122 159540014 ILOT 14, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
123 159540015 ILOT 15, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
124 159540016 ILOT 16, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
125 159540017 ILOT 17, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
126 159540018 ILOT 18, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
127 159540019 ILOT 19, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
128 159540020 ILOT 20, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
129 159540021 ILOT 21, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
130 159540022 ILOT 22, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
131 159540023 1 LOT 23, MAP 1282991-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
132 159540024 I LOT 24, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
133 159540025 ILOT 25, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
134 159540026 ILOT 26, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
135 159540027 I LOT 27, MAP 12B29 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
136 159540028 ILOT 28, MAP 12B29 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,3B5.42
137 159540029 1 LOT 29, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
138 159540030 ILOT 30, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42
139 159540031 ILOT 31, MAP 12B29 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
140 159540032 I LOT 32, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
141 159540033 ILOT 33, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
142 159540034 I LOT 34, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
143 159540035 I LOT 35, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
144 159540036 ILOT 36, MAP 12829 91-292096 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
145 159540037 ILOT 37, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
146 159540038 ILOT 38, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. I 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
147 159540039 ILOT 39, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
148 159540040 ILOT 40, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
149 159540041 ILOT 41, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
150 159540042 ILOT 42, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
151 159540043 ILOT 43, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
152 159540044 ILOT 44, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
153 159540045 ILOT 45, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
154 159540046 ILOT 46, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 1
155 159540047 ILOT 47, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
156 159540048 I LOT 48, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
157 159540049 ILOT 49, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
158 159540050 ILOT 50, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
159 159540051 I LOT 51, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
160 159540052 ILOT 52, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,3B5.42 I
161 159540053 ILOT 53, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
162 159540054 ILOT 54, MAP 12829 91-292096 FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42 I
/ (}-t/c~
17-Jul-92 5
ASSESSMENT ROLL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION OWNER ASMT. ASMT.
===--=============================================================================================================--==
163 159540055 I LOT 55, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CD. 13,049.61 11,385.42
164 159540056 I LOT 56, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\D THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
165 159540057 ILOT 57, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
166 159540058 I LOT 58, MAP 12829 91-292096 I FN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 13,049.61 11,385.42
2,166,235.26 1,889,979.72
167 159539039 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
168 159540059 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
169 159538121 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
170 159538120 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
171 159540060 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
172 159503015 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
173 159503016 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
174 159503017 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
175A 159503020 ITOWNHOME PRODUCT IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN co. 9,022.04 8,716.49
I IT = 216 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 1,939,738.36 1,882,761.49
175B 159503020 ICONDO PRODUCT IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 6,499.44 7,236.98
1 I C = 141 IFN PROJECTS, INC C\O THE BALDWIN CO. 1,020,411.30 1,020,416.58
176 159503010 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
177 159503010 I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
178 I I EXEMPT ICITY OF CHULA VISTA 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ASSESSMENT 5,126,384.92 4,793,157.79
/0-1;
This Amended Final Report dated:
33
,1992
By:
John P. Lippitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
/ !) ~~?{}
I, Beverly A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing
asse. ssment, toget~-t.::e diagram attached thereto, was filed in my office on
the \"\ day of k , 1991.
-
City Clerk
City of Chula Vista
State of California
M
I, Beverly A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing
assessment, together with the diagram attached thereto, was approved and
~ed by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the c2~ day of
.L.. , 1991.
~~~~~.~
City of Chula Vista
State of California
I, John P. Uppitt, as Superintendent of Streets of said City, do hereby certify that
the foregoing assessments, togqther with the diagram attached thereto, was
recorded in my office on the ~ If- day of !!!.!:f ' 1991.
/
perintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
) ()- 5/
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
for Unit 1, (Map 12827, 91-292094), Unit 2 (Map 12828, 91-292095) and Unit 3 (Map
12829, 91-292096).
The properties within the assessment district boundary are currently under
development. Because ofthe interrelationship of the various public improvements needed
for development, the assessment district funding and construction mechanism is an
efficient way to fund and construct the improvements.
Soread Methodologv
Project No.1: Project Grading
Project No.2: East "H" Street
East "H" Street and State Route 125, together with other major streets, are included
within the City's Development Impact Fee program, a program for financing the major
streets in the eastern area. The total eligible DIF was quantified to be $1,381,896.00 (Page
29). Project No.1 grading and Project NO.2 for East "H" Street are eligible within the
DIF (refer to Estimate of Costs, Project No.2).
District allocation costs attributed to included streets are a result of inherent benefit
to the future parcels to essentially provide transportation facilities. The benefit to the
properties within this District is that through each property's participation, it attains its
share of capacity in the eastern area circulation street system. Since these facilities are
a part of this program, we are applying the same methodology for benefit that was used
in the formulation of the Development Impact Fee program. Therefore, the assessment
levy against each parcel equals the amount of the Development Impact Fee.
The cost allocation will be spread upon the average daily traffic generation rates
and equivalent dwelling unit factors as established by the DIF Transportation Program
within Table 1, as follows:
36
) tJ-~.2
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
for Unit 1, (Map 12827, 91-292094), Unit 2 (Map 12828, 91-292095) and Unit 3 (Map
12829,91-292096).
The properties within the assessment district boundary are currently under
development. Because ofthe interrelationship of the various public improvements needed
for development, the assessment district funding and construction mechanism is an
efficient way to fund and construct the improvements.
SDread Methodoloav
Project No.1: Project Grading
Project No.2: East "H" Street
East "H" Street and State Route 125, together with other major streets, are included
within the City's Development Impact Fee program, a program for financing the major
streets in the eastern area. The total eligible DIF was quantified to be $1,381,896.00 (Page
29). Project NO.1 grading and Project NO.2 for East "H" Street are eligible within the
DIF (refer to Estimate of Costs, Project No.2).
District allocation costs attributed to included streets are a result of inherent benefit
to the future parcels to essentially provide transportation facilities. The benefit to the
properties within this District is that through each property's participation, it attains its
share of capacity in the eastern area circulation street system. Since these facilities are
a part of this program, we are applying the same methodology for benefit that was used
in the formulation of the Development Impact Fee program. Therefore, the assessment
levy against each parcel equals the amount of the Development Impact Fee.
The cost allocation will be spread upon the average daily traffic generation rates
and equivalent dwelling unit factors as established by the DIF Transportation Program
within Table 1, as follows:
36
/0- ;J
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
street network is completed, thereby providing additional capacity in the overall circulation
network.
The Storm Drain System for these major transportation facilities has been allocated
from a storm drain system designed to mitigate the storm water generated from the Salt
Creek Ranch. The Storm Drain System specifically serving East "H" Street has been
allocated by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt Creek
I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District.
The Estimate of Costs, contained hereinbefore, reconciles the Development Impact
Fees for eligible DIF infrastructure. Other items of construction and incidentals which
were not eligible for DIF credits were made a part of this assessment district. Those
costs are to be spread to the properties benefitted using the ADT factors as noted in
Table 1.
The addition of applicable incidentals and financing costs were added to the DIF
for a total spread amount to the properties participating in the DIF.
Soread Methodoloav
Project NO.4: Water System
The Water System is comprised of two pressure zone areas --710 and 980, as
defined by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
water system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt
Creek I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District. Therefore,
the construction cost for the water system has been assigned to these benefitting areas
by their allocation percentage (Wilson Report, page two, within Appendix). Only those
costs assigned to the District are to be spread to the benefitted parcels.
Historical water demand factors for the land uses within the District have previously
been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units the NBS-Lowry Water Subarea Master Plan,
February 23, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for the Water
System:
38 / C:5i
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
street network is completed, thereby providing additional capacity in the overall circulation
network.
The Storm Drain System for these major transportation facilities has been allocated
from a storm drain system designed to mitigate the storm water generated from the Salt
Creek Ranch. The Storm Drain System specifically serving East "H" Street has been
allocated by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt Creek
I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District.
The Estimate of Costs, contained hereinbefore, reconciles the Development Impact
Fees for eligible DIF infrastructure. Other items of construction and incidentals which
were not eligible for DIF credits were made a part of this assessment district. Those
costs are to be spread to the properties benefitted using the ADT factors as noted in
Table 1.
The addition of applicable incidentals and financing costs were added to the DIF
for a total spread amount to the properties participating in the DIF.
SDread Methodoloav
Project No.4: Water System
The Water System is comprised of two pressure zone areas --710 and 980, as
defined by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
water system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt
Creek I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District. Therefore,
the construction cost for the water system has been assigned to these benefitting areas
by their allocation percentage (Wilson Report, page two, within Appendix). Only those
costs assigned to the District are to be spread to the benefitted parcels.
Historical water demand factors for the land uses within the District have previously
been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units the NBS-Lowry Water Subarea Master Plan,
February 23, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for the Water
System:
38
..-..r'
/ 0- }?~
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
Land Use Tvpe
Assianment
Single Family Residential, Detached
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
Townhouse, Residential
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Condominium, Residential
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Project No.5: Reclaimed Water
The Reclaimed Water System to be included in the District consists of only the 16-
inch reclaimed transmission main. The total system consists of both 8-inch and 16-inch
transmission mains. These facilities are located within East "H" Street, Proctor Valley
Road and Mt. Miguel Road. As with the Water System, the costs of this project have
been allocated between the District and other benefitting areas. Per page four of the
Wilson Report --as previously cited-- the cost sharing for the Reclaimed Water Facilities
are defined as applicable to the District.
The utility of this system is of benefit to the entire District area for its erosion,
irrigation and landscape maintenance. Since the Reclaimed Water System will serve vital
erosion control and appurtenant slope maintenance, in combination with the landscaping
amenities, the spread allocation will be the same methodology used for the roadway
projects. This benefit assignment will be based upon trip generation assignment by land
use as defined in Table 1.
Project NO.6: Sewer System
Project NO.7: Offsite Sewer - Proctor Valley Road
The number of units benefitting from the Salt Creek Ranch were estimated based
upon the latest SPA Plan and confirmed by recorded maps within the Salt Creek I area.
As with the Water System and the Reclaimed Water System, the Sewer System proposed,
including the variable diameter Offsite Sewer proceeding from the District Boundary
northerly within Proctor Valley Road into the County of San Diego, has been allocated
39 J {/~~6
as it serves and benefits the District. Only those costs allocated to the District shall be
spread to the benefitting parcels.
Historical wastewater generation factors for the land uses within the District have
previously been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units in the NBS-Lowry Wastewater
Subarea Master Plan, May, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for
the Sewer System:
Land Use Tvoe
EDU Assianment
Single Family Residential, Detached
Townhouse, Residential
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Condominium, Residential
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
The cost of incidentals has been spread proportionately over the various
improvements in the direct proportion that the improvement bears to the total cost of
improvements for both the DIF eligible and non-DIF eligible improvements.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for Assessment District No.
90-1 are spread in direct accordance with the benefits that the land within the district
boundary receives from the works of improvements.
Dated: IO/I1..jQ/
Muni Financial Services, Inc.
~f!~
David Keltner, P.E.
Director, Special District Services
/ tJ ~ 57
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART IV - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
BOUNDARY MAPS AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS are on file in the offices of the
City Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets. Reduced copies of these maps are
contained hereinafter.
41 /0/521
_..._.__.......,..,.'.,...i....-...____
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART V - DfSCRlPTJON OF WORK
The general description at work to be acquired by this Assessment District consists
at the tollowing:
1. East "H" Street: (proposed right-at-way to vary trom 104' to 152') trom Eastlake
Drive to Mt. Miguel Road; including, but not limited to, grading, street improvement,
water, sewer, storm drain, telephone, electricity, gas, landscaping and related
appurtenant structures.
2. STATE ROUTE 125: (bisected by "H" St. southwesterly corner at District) rough
grading, erosion control, landscaping and block wall construction.
3. Mt. Miguel Road (proposed 88' right-at-way): tram Proctor Valley Road to
approximately 1500' south at East "H" Street, 44' right-at-way to include
grading, water, sewer, storm drain, and related appurtenant structures.
4. Proctor Valley Road (San Diego County, varying 60' right-at-way) to include
grading, water, and related appurtenant structures.
5. Offsite Sewer: Within Proctor Valley Road: Facility varies in diameter from 10",
12",15", approximately 9819' linear feet proceeding from the within the District (the
City at Chula Vista) then exiting northwesterly within Proctor Valley Road into the
County at San Diego.
6. Main Infrastructure Water, Sewer, Reclaimed Water and Storm Drain traversing and
serving single tamily residential home areas within the boundary of the District.
42
/C '~51
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
I SALT CREEK I I
FOR THE
",- CITY OF CHULA VISTA
"" ....... ~UNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALFORNlA
........ ------
....... ~w.......... ...-;..-;-~-----
@
QRAPHtC SCALE
200 0 200
'"...._~
...
I
1._'
,_._n
/
/
/
/
I /
I / /
'/ /
l~ /
/ /
I I
I I
I I
It; /
I~I
I~/
I" /
/'~ /
/t;-/
I"'~/
/ /
/ I
/ /
" / I
~~"'-...../ / - - - - ..-T--...
) 1-1-1'"/.....
/ /"""'0." ~/l-;-
......
VICINITY MAP
-~
LEGEND
--
@
@I
-.-
-.-..
MFS
""Nt FINANCIAL aPtVICEs. lne.
41217 Me ....
........ ,.....
T._.wl, . c...,...... .,SN
17141 ..-.ana
.....'"
SHEET 1 Of IS
I
I
I
-.!
. .. .. . .. _::::::::J~~{}{ :::~:~:~:t~t I
-----
<D t .
. .
" .
.....
.. -@
.........
'.'::::::. II .. ... . .
.~~::.
. .... .
. ...
..
~,
"'I
III
:>
CJ
li
..:
~ i
.
.
l
l
.
@
I.......
,....CT_..._
UIIlr'I'''''llI_._
-..-........-
...... ---.-
-
........-..............".____cnT
..e........~.."..TI..c_CNI.__..._
--.....--- .--
...u...-___,___ ..
A___......._....__
111'111_"_'-"" ,_,"'_CIn''''
-..-__"""TIlI_"".. -._
.._'0___...._.._.-..
".._- ._.,..-~_...-
....-"uw.__.-......__
---
GnY_CR'I'_~_"
.....___._.."._..._an...
-.._.._---JIr,&"W_ _
......_ATl'....__a
-.--...-.-. .-..
_Clft",__A__lIIII>'___
(1R* .-.--.-.
CII'I'I'..__ra
--~,-~_..,---
..- ~r..-":=-=_'M:'.'
111_""" ......... lIT...
...__c-.,
J(;//~
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I )
FOR THE
, " CITY OF CHULA VISTA
", ...... ~UNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
....... ------
....., NOCTolI"............
"@ @
SlUT 1 OF 5
--
I
I
I
j
.. .
'" .
..........
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 ~. ~
~------
...
I
'"'
::I I
I.....'
._._n
.
.
.
.
.
/
/
/
/
I /
I / /
~ II /
~/ I
I I
I I
I I
I I
It; I
I~I
It; I
I" I
I ,'l:o I
1';'1
l,;fl
I I
/ I
I /
'- / /
~"--' /
)d'~..,. (
,. ~(C".......
/ /""'-. ~/~i'
....
8
VICINITY MAP
-~
,5aU_
ft&eT__....
IIIlI"rt.....,ft7._
lIIlI"rilo....ft___
.......---
---
--.
....1l.___.,.........y_C~..."._cnT
.. CIlUI.A ..f... .,,:n WI C""'- _,.~.. ~
_______ '_A_
.............._110&...._- .-
"..___....A-'-...__
._ClI'l'IDI"M'~" ._.....CftT..
-... -...---"""..-.... --
._'10__....._.__..
_.~.. ._........ucr_..._
A..._~A__'_....-__
---
LEGEND
--.
@
[/:@.
-.-
GIn _ CRT ... __ --.-A
I
_.~
,.,..__......ClTT_.....-....
-... ...f.. __---.M1' .._ ....
GIT'I_SITI''''---.
MF8
_.__w___r ._.01"
1NIClTT___Il__......... ....
('lR* .-.-.-.
etn..___.
......_~Y..~_.T___
..- ~:..-"':=-=~
"_,.,_ .........-r....
MUNI F1HAlfctAL SI!llIYICl[ll. I....
.QZ17 Itl. If__
........Fl_
T._..... . C.Il"fftll 8211'0
17141 ..-.s....
......,
I (J-6 )
ASSESSMENT rnAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I I
FOR THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SlEET 3 OF 5
@
-
@
-
@ @ @
---
@
-
RIVERCREEK COURT
@ @
--
e
@ @ @
---
@ Q
- Z
..
@l ..
15 -
- > 8
@ ~
-
- @l
e
-
VICINITY MAP
"~
LEGEND
,--
GRAPHIC SeAU
'" b '"
,., _ _ lI..........d
--
'j'
---- ------
MFS
@
--
,.,..,.
,--""
MUM '....NClA&. snvtCl:., .....
.U17 Rle ....
......-.....
T........ . C..,.,.. .:115_0
In.., ..e.4IHO
r:::i~:::i:H ---.--
- ---.-..
"'10*
/tJ~6c2
@i
VICINITY MAP
---
MFS
..... '''''/ltCIAL sDVtCEI. .....
4Ut7IlI. .....
...... .......
T_..... . c..,..... .a...
171.., ..-.a...
lOOWC:
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I )
FOR THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN llIEGO. STATE OF CAUFORIlIA
SlEET 3 OF 5
@ @ @
........-----
SEA
BREEZE
COURT
@
.-
@ Q
- Z
"'
@ ..
II< -
"'
- > @
@ ii
-
- @
-
@
-
@
LEGEND
- - - - -~
GRAPHIC SCALE
~ _ -! . '1' 'j"
I"""-_~
.--
I.flnl
'_.711"
@)
--
r{::::~::i~:::d --- "'...
- ~--...
/O~b}
ASSESSMENT rnAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I )
FOR THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN OIEOO. STATE OF CALFORHIA
SlEET 5 OF 5
.' S~,,~
..\\
"..",,,
@l<
GRAPHIC SCALE
'~-~
.-...-
'_._IT
VICINITY MAP
--
LEGEND
---- --
.--
MFS
8 --
f:::1::~:X~,:~\J -",-.
- --..--
MUMt,...ute&AL.~ I...
....17111. N'"
........ F'-
T_..... . c...... .UN
Inti ........
'''''
/ (;?~'h
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I I
FOR TIE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN IllECO, STAn OF CAUFORHIA
~v.t.~
o''l\' S .
.....s'"
~..
QIIAPHIC SCALE
'~.._.u..-:.'" "..
,_.....
1_.-"
VICINITY MAP
-~
LEGEND
---- -~
--
MFS
8 --
r:{d!j:~;:i] ---.-.
- ...-..,,--
..... ...AItCUL s...... I....
40'17.........
...... ......
T_.... . c...,..... .....
Inti ....,no
,""
/CJ~b~
SlIEET 5 OF 5
ATTACHMENT
TO THE
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
FN PROJECTS, INC.
9800 S. SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90045
THE BALDWIN COMPANY
11975 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130
/O---j,b
ATTACHMENT
TO THE
NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
FN PROJECTS, INC.
9800 S. SEPULVEDA BOULEVARD
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90045
THE BALDWIN COMPANY
11975 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 200
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130
/o~~7
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISmlCT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The undersigned, David R. Keltner, hereby acknowledges that the following is all true and
correct.
At all times herein ;mentioned, the undersigned was, and is the authorized representative
of Muni Financial Services, Inc., the duly appointed Assessment Engineer of the City of
Chula Vista, California.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California for the construction and acquisition of certain public improvements in
a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND ACKNOWLEDGES AS FOLLOWS:
a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City.
X b. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City, EXCEPT FOR
THOSE DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "F" attached hereto, showing maps of
rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time.
Muni Financial Services, Inc.
/Jt~
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CAUFORNIA
It)--IP'7
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RIGHT-OF-WAY CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The undersigned, David R. Keltner, hereby acknowledges that the following is all true and
correct.
At all times herein ;mentioned, the undersigned was, and is the authorized representative
of Muni Rnancial Services, Inc., the duly appointed Assessment Engineer of the City of
Chula Vista, California.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California for the construction and acquisition of certain public improvements in
a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND ACKNOWLEDGES AS FOllOWS:
a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City.
X b. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City, EXCEPT FOR
THOSE DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "F" attached hereto, showing maps of
rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time.
Muni Rnancial Services, Inc.
v8/!~
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JO /62f
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amended Final approval by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the
day of , 1992.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
45
It)~!P!
._.."--_...__.__.._---_._._.._,~ ---.---~,-
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amended Final approval by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the
day of , 1992.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
45
It) -7tJ
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPENDIX
46
/o~ ? /
-
I
I
'II
' I II : ~ i
I
5J . . ~ I
, / Z .' liiil
. I!
~.
=! I ! II c~
.
~ I "'........
I I CIll- O
:
JiJ-'j;l ;
:
. ,.
00" u:
.: ..
~~;H
:;;,,, I
-""" .....::. r
---
d.~ +
-- -....
- -
:E
W
I-
-- C1)
. -- -- >-
OYOH 13nmW 'lW .
..r:J'Y~ C1)
.
.
al a:
: W
I-
1-<
(.) in;:
. @ :l:Q
Xw
. " Wi!!!
. .
I- <I:
. . ..J
. ()
. . W
a:
.
.
. .
. .
"-
"
"
\
"
" I
~ I~I
.... /~/
" I<Q-/
'-" /
~(
~,:'t'
/ ~ "
/ L.~ l"""-
v/ "
I
I
.
.
i !
I . ! = I
I'.
2 ; . ~
i . ! = I
/ Z i L i !
, i I IQO
. I
. I I
. ;0........
I I rlU-
I i
,
r:JJ u
J(}~/3 .... i
- !
"'"
"H__ _._____.~...'_m
..
OVOl! 13nmW "lW
..
..
.
..
-:l....... .o~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
o
"'"
I-
@
:Ea:
. WW
Q 1-::
. rn w
. >rn
I-rn
- W
e a: I-
x w-
X ~~
W wu.
cno
----I
I
I
I
I .
I. :
: .
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
,
,
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
:~ =
,.
,.
It,
: ~
"
:~
:~
,~
I
,
I
:I , . ~
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
x.
,
,
,
,
,
,
\
" I
'-;.. /~,'
'... /f~"'1
, / I
',../ f
, .,<(, /
...... ~(
J ~~ \
/ ~ ,
/ ~ '
/ <<;"" r~
.... .r.... ...
. ,
/
I
::c:
hi
is .......
u ~5.
@
a
~
I i
.
~ i ~
.. , i :
u_ -.
..- Z . I
, I l.
!I I
. .
. .
I
'I
: i I
! .
. I .
! : I
! i !
leo
lI'l"-'
1m...
.
.
.
i
j
r:J) .
.
... !
- !
"'"
UU~
:>O:.~
.....:..:
~!:::~
/0-;
--~
IIi
I
I
I
,
I
I
I.
I.
I
:i I
..I
I
I
..
as ".r;)1:l.U
.,,,
.
u
..
b
. .
u U
- -
.
u
-
.
u
..
!!
.. l;!
.J ~
..
"'~-. .1'
~
UJ
f0-
CI)
. >-
~cn
,
fo-!:
-<(
!!:!a:
::t:c
~~
a:
o
f0-
CI)
()
""
I-
@
I
..
'.
1:1
lli
,
I
a;l D
~I =
~l :
.
:I
-
.
,-
o
I .
,8
,I
,~
I
I.
I~
I li
/
/
I
I
/~
.;<:->
:;;::;:;
t!i ::;,,: (~:)
i ~i!,,,
U ij:::: ~
........
........
'<<.:.
:.:-:-:: :-
:::::::::;
$"
....,.,'.. .
ir~~)n/ [~
':-:::;.'
I
I , I
: :
I ; . i I
I i .
. . .
: i : I
i . . i
! .
: l
, . .
-. I leu
/ Z i. .
, !I I .
- .
I ",u.-.... .
I Icn~ !
I ,
"
CD ,.
/O/ZS' l,
... "
- H
~
-.
..
-.
ill
III
III
..
Water Demand Factors
wdUse EDU's
Residential, Single Family Detached 1.0/ du
Residential,. Condominiums .8/ du
Residential, Apartments .7/ du
Retail 7.8/ acre
Commercial 5.6/ acre
Industrial 5.6/ acre
Church 2.0/ site
Clubhouse 7.8/ acre
Visitor's Center 7.8/ acre
Table 2
II
.
..
t
t
Pipe sizes and water demand factors for the 980 system were taken from the NBS
Lowry WOIer Subarea Master Plan, February 23, 1990. The Black and Veatch Otay
WOIer District Benefit Analysis, April 16, 1990, was used in conjunction with the
NBS Lowry Report to determine the extent of oversizing in the system. Funding for
the 980 system through Assessment District 90-3 includes the installation cost of the
minimum sized pipe necessary to service the EastLake Development only.
l-
I-
l-
I-
1-
l-
1--
JSSlJANE11()4()()(}.XVu", 10. J99J
38
/rJ/7~
WilSON- ENGINEERING
WATER. WASTEWATER. ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SALT CREEK I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
COST SHARING ANALYSIS
..1
.J
j
J
J
J
703 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. SUITE 300 . CARLSBAD. CA 92009 . (619) 438-4422
/0-7
Salt Creek I Assessment District Cost Sharing Analysis
Cor Water and Sewer Facilities
. .. ..,-_..",---_.. - -
.....,.-...............-.................
i'lllii;f1
11!'!!;il;l;iil""!:"'!"li;
-.,.:,:,.:,..::~::::.-.-..-:..,........
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
10" Gravity Sewer Line $6,468 SSO 632 0 1,182 47%
12" Water Line, 710 $52,160 169 0 300 469 36%
Zone
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
980/710 PRS and 16" W,294 169 0 I 6SS 824 21%
Water Line, 980 Zone
(N. of East H SL)
16" Water Line, 980 $67,500 381 300 0 681 S6%
Zone (S. of East H SL)
Subtotal 594,794
. 10" Gravity Sewer Line $30,030 381 2S3 0 634 60%
EAST "H" STREET
16" Water Line, 980 517S,530 SSG 600 35S 1,SOS 37%
Zone /'
12" Water Line, 710 $94,715 169 0 300 469 36%
Zone
Subtotal 5270,245
WATER LINES THROUGH SFD
10" and 12" Water $119,476 169 0 75 244 70%
Lines, 710 Zone
SEWER LINES THROUGH SFD
8" and 10" Gravity $98,064 454 632 0 1,086 42%
Sewer Lines
OFFSITE PROCTOR VAlLEY SEWER
10" Gravity Sewer Line $190,000 SSO 632 612 1,794 31%
12" Gravity Sewer Line $77,000 SSO 632 802 1,984 28%
15" Gravity Sewer Line $21S,000 SSG 632 1,642 2,824 ~
Subtotal $48Z,OOO
,< ,.,.,.,",....._'.i...........'. ..,.,.'...'.......---,......'.-..;...-..'-.:...- ....'., 1....;..< I;.. .; ;.. i< co--'-,.-.,:",,:,:-__ .....-.:'.,.:-:.-.;.-,-;-:-.;..:.,:",.;
;Si;m;23T .--...,.'-'...'..............--...-.:.
1...< .-;:.......:.:/:::.::':.;::,:::>:,::::\.:::::::\:,::::::::
1.< '''-,:'-'''"':-''''-'-:''''':'-
............,....'..,-..-.._......
/tl~ 7~
Liz Long
August 2, 1991
Page 4
Reclaimed Water Facilities
The reclaimed water facilities to be included in the assessment district consist
of 8 and 16-inch reclaimed water transmission mains. For purposes of
determining the percent share of these facilities attributable to Salt Creek I, an
oversizing methodology was utilized. At this time, there is no accurate way to
establish the benefitting areas outside of Salt Creek I based on the projected
demand.
The oversizing methodology calculates the Salt Creek I share for all
transmission mains greater than 8-inches in diameter based on the unit
construction cost; the unit construction cost for 8-inch ACP class 200 is $21 per
lineal foot and 16-inch ACP class 200 is $35 per lineal foot. Th"e following table
summarizes the reclaimed water facilities cost sharing analysis.
Cost Sharing Summary for Reclaimed Water Facilities
--
EAST"H" STREET
16" Reclaimed Water Line
$185,945
60%
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
16" Reclaimed Water Line
$105,325
60%
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
16" Reclaimed Water Line (N. of East "H" St.)
8" Reclaimed Water Line (5. of East "H" St.)
Subtotal
RECLAIMED WATER LINE THROUGH SFD
$39,215
$24,808
60%
100%
$64,023
$11,472
$366,165
100%
8" Reclaimed Water Line
JO~77
Liz Long
August 2, 1991
PageS
Storm Drain Facilities
The McIntire Group, Inc. provided the information to determine the cost split
of storm drain facilities. The calculations in the appendix present the cost
estimate of storm drain facilities required for East "H" Street without the
development of Salt Creek 1. The following table provides a cost comparison
with the estimated construction cost of the proposed facilities (with Salt Creek
I):
Storm Drain Cost Comparison
1lllllllliil'li iliil'i;;~~llliiil'ill; .~1ililfliilli;1
East "H" Street
$347,901
$152,190
56%
1 Prepared by McIntire Group, Inc. (See Appendix)
The Salt Creek I share was determined by taking the difference between the
costs with and without development and dividing by the estimate with
development of the Salt Creek I project.
It/roC
WILSON ENGINEERING
::SALT" Cteu~ I
As:E.s:: ""S,J'"
DI:;r.a1 Cor
CAt,,~IJ4A no,...;:;
A=
,^-,;4 r E.d.
rAt'-IL..J .,-,S-!:
THE.
ar-
c.ArC6001'f:'"
....T"'TAC-rlE&
1?1E. A.e.E.A
/VO'"'nI
SAc..r
Ctcc:_ =
......,,,.,. IDI$,...n'/~
,,.JC~l..AIIf!!I6~ IN
THE
"OrHE.~"
IN TH€ t.c.T"7'&'L .42.c=,:tIoaT: 1'";;,s ~t!A loS
A c.aA.J$ &AljlAr'''E 1.."
t-c--..J tE.~rU'-tArE C~ rife /JA.CI~tSdr'1
WI""',,-..}
CJl-;j""'A""E.~.,
(,JAr~(.
BE.,....e~
E~e.vAnQ,.J .
77f~
0,.,.,., WI'fT~ D,~wr/cr e,v,.JfCN
SA..r c...ee...:r "...",os....
/is,.., s",r ;:adO,., '1'I-t~
""'/1...4-
1=,.1:.11...1 n'-.:. As $HQ.-,v; 171'~
rHC
7/0 ~D""e
r:.c
"'(J""'4l~y1 S
6-.-.... "'- /-'...-.. ......""...,
t!E:.
13
I~
15
1(.
17
19
6oS-nJJ! -rHAe I
.:9"'"
"'....
LA,,-/Q U.s.e.
Gc; """'" M eLCIAl-
~/O ~"'AL.
{ Z. 'OJ!__
/le-s /0, s....u;t1,-
( g Q"IA-C.)
J2:J:.,5ID c;....I nlJt-
( "I1).;,..c.)
J2t!SIQ~n...--
1'2 pu,ac.)
~6S/o~"'~
(ZP"IA~)
FIIt.Ar .:-,....,.,......,
.MIse
(a.S DUI~<)
TOTAl.-
A-.c.GIII I:
QI,,,,ac.;
Bi'9J.("oQ o~
..........
'7 So ~,.,..~
(1:= '" IS~) c.._~"_a ....
I I
De.s'W"'~S
..".
I'&~-.s :
E.f;JI.III/.
.. .c.&A VI'J1rs
SA' r:.s
qOAc.- 180
201lc.. 1&.0
1$ 19c. '0
'+0 ...c.. 80
IS AC. .30
z.
IS C. AL...
78
)tJ -9(}
G5S
"-''>
.1 7:;: I" I
112.
D/s rl2l(;r
5Al-' C/tt:../i.rc.
I As:r~':,/'4~,...Jr
':UllJECT
. ~,(T ~,)
WILSON ENGINEERING
.s AlJ CA..EG/f.. r As.:c.=':'--'f!-.Nr D,srn...r:r CAl.GS (:,,,,w r::
7i-es '"
C,ss
c,.,rr..lrs Mv~r- T7"'~ iS6 ~JI2.1":'fG-1:.
O'VIO t;.a
J3 "'nv~
nt..
7/0 2o-4!! ~
,."..
980
ileAl ~ .
'-A,vO No
/3
/~
IS
Ir.
17
/~
~5
M IS<:..
CJf'J ! ~$
7/0 2,a",,<! '780 ;!...... 70,-,.,,,.
6.5 0 GS
"0 /2-0 180
/'10 2..0 /r.o
0 (PO ~o
0 eo eo
0 ,3Q .30
0 Z. 2-
3>5 '-13 78
3 0:::) V,J''I"S :3 !S S .."" ~5S ,-"""r,
rom.s.
Nore
7711'Ir'
0/'./'-7
:257.
OF
rue
:300 (J,..;,'3
IN
",E
7/0 caNE;
A/t.~
A.sS~'" 6Q
~ 4c"....~'r
Fa'""
TH(;
10 """"" 1"2.. -,,,, c... ,..011-&1< "I'NEs 71Ha C"~'H
IH:r:S '" /Se.e","",,:
.D~I/el-a ,P""'~r.
m..
S~,...J~~~
~/t...'"?
THe
/0 """'"'"
/2. -,_Crt ~
t..IN~~
AtOVIDt;
-4
t.oD I' 6a
.s..,s rGrT
,.;,...
'T7M S' ~(',,'-~ ~/~~ """G,.4 ~
00
"vOr
4"'^'t! r:=, r
7?-f<S
.A"eA
",-ry
-""= cuntICT"_'7
-4S
THE
;::::::;..clt.lr/~
,N
E;;...,r
1-1 Sr,.,..6> SA"J ,Nfle......... ~
/ /J - 7,.Q
.;!J''''
...5A1-7" ~~.:z;<. :r ASSEZss,vL;_r D,:rT.e.,r::..r
~U;UfC.
I-'~~("I~~,:"
~5.7l.8 I 7VAe I
. " ' ....
.'. )" 1'--15>'
. .......
.', "'.""'-.......-,
l '..
\
,
"
. '--'"'
, - \
-
/,';
/../
11,1.
;;-'
i"
//:'
-.;
if!
...
I'
i.'! ,
. i, . .'r.- ,r'-
, i ~ ~ " '~:-' ~/l" ('
, ,: . . .ff '-
Les.)....~h, ;.) ..
. . Iiii;,-- . .,'/): .,'
: ^,'. ,.,) . \',. ./1' .... -.
"',~ i'~..r\ 9.8ahf,9(;~,t0'-
I \. J' [)..: cJ.-z ?' "\,\ '. S)PND~'f'>
'I' D~, I 'i'. .~.,
! \, r"' __/H-o;.f7/~sp ,
"-- // . .8el/ND ......Jf.J...7'
1" -..~,......
. "~':'"",:...., '.~. ..;.' ~
. - ....., . '-/
.. :r~ -. ",' ,,,.-. ..-;-
. "r' l
. -- -:,'C -.:.-..;.
. , '
'.-J
(/
\ . .'.
.>r~}"
~:- /'
i'_ I
.~. f
,
." I
~.
t
"
-,
.."t.; "\
C.. ';
,-
:
",
.,
...
,
"
,
I
i
,.
\. \'"
,.
... '
..... .\
, )
.'. ,-'1
\; 7..'
'-'" t$:l..:.'
......;,~k
. ._\.',U,'
.
~-.
;.
"
\
.
.-.....
.: _,;:c ~
~
~
~'..........~ \
" ...... . .
\\ .'- +\:, ,
.~t~.\~7~. ':;~L'0:\~~r'. ! '.
~';,>~' ~n- ;.J..
. ,...)!....... 1
. ;p.~.\ '"
:\1 ")l
.
"'-,
'"
"':'
~", ~....
...) "-. .'\. ,."
--' ~
~~ ---...Je.t rQ~f:'
..,/_:>'" ~
\. ~... /~'../ ..,.,' :
'.: ." .,' /". ,.'
.,~{:. --'_,"'; //'/;1
_.-_..JI"o...,~~.~/., ,:1 .....
;~t-;:-....,-,;/' //l... .' .,~' .
-\.\ ':\""':'\,-1 "i ~ .....
. .1-1\" ~ _./;,. /'.,
..-'::~_ /., i. ..../',';' '_'/~'
" ;..... I ~ ----.... . . "
,.~f~%~j.:.~.; .~~ ... - ,.
..-)~~"'~./,. ---
._'( '.. ~/ " - - "-. I /"
'0 '/./'1/ . ///'....... ,.. f
(; ,,./ /'.' / ...........'";, -. .-- - -=-' 'l.----/
~,,'...;..//"'-..~ r~-
,
1 If:
! ".
/.
I
.~.,_....
1"-'
'J. '-
j
1.
.t'
t."
.'
, " 7A~". ......-.t i
'- ' . , '. ,....... .;
?'O:'.-FiZa'M.'.!N';,.;lou,;,J [;/'>oJ(,,u,;
~~ i.' .'; .....' \.... ... '. .'"..,:.
" II . ,..' f _"-'-.1'
. ',:" ...-',--;' ,/ ./' ....,_.- . . " '" .
'( I 0: . .;/ '. , p - ' ..
. /./. '!"o.~.'V~'7 ~~'.4-._
.r!: {.' --." )"-)"~ ; , . '.,I~
\, \. " i 6!fAO/~n' .rs~SA,: .A~'-'t-SJ~
"~' . i J' /~ I' ,,":,--,/' :/.. *,'-
. P'~~z..;~,,~' CU"... r, mrkr I
<:~. ~!;:i' :~ '~. .: \ '\ .;
'\'.\'.: \'~~; S/.r'~/~j ,..-',
. . '. . " -.;.-"\' '\. . ._'~~' .I"~, --l
.,~... .:. ... ~~__~ ....\ :-:~!...J'f.C. I
, ." - ". ..... ,~."~~.~'
..,....... ....., . _.~'_'. :,. ..~ ;.,,~,.....J
,.'1,. _.-. -... ~ - '-"J; .
" ":: .' .."_.--:-~" ~~"...__.'" ,...
':';'::~':'''''' .. ....~.;~'~..~. .':-' .:1.... i:..:'
,., :...-......' '--~.
, . '--~ -. ..z-
,
\..
, .
,
"'".;,.:....
.w' ...
..'....
.. i ~.
21-
. j
"r~-/;.'
J. .! . ,,..
,..(i .~
~.
.: .'11
SA~i! CR~J
: .- o_r-u I
.- ,/." ~.",-". j
~~ ". .'
.:~
,
!
I
j
,
!
.
o.
f ~
.' '.
-'
I
f
I
I
,
,
i
.
,
\. f ,
FTllfE
",..
.
j
i
i
!
i
,
i
j'
I
t.
I
r:;
$7.
'-..:..
. /
-:;..:;,
7/11/91
STORM DRAIN COST COMPARISON
FOR EAST "E" S'rREE't
.
STO~1 DRAIN COST
'1'l!!':~OUT SA!.T CRE~ !
DETn!.OP1-'~IT
--------------------
"i"T'~A'
...--.
QtL\.liT!::'Y . UNIT
emIT
COST
TOTAL
------~---------------------------------------------
,
,"u RCP 6ao LF $43.00 $29,240
.0
.,.,,, RCP 550 -- $45.00 $29,250
-- !..:
,
30" R~ 150 r.;;' $65.00 $9,750
!
42" ReI' 330 LF $75.00 $24,750
I
;,-:rnG~S 4 ZACE: $2,500.00 $10,000
!
cu<m ~'fLEX s :E:.~CH $3,500.00 $28,000
;
CLEANOP'I'S Ii EACH $3,000.00 $18,000
.
R!P R.~ 80 CY $40.00 $3,200
-----------
TOTAL: $152,190
,
,
i
i
,. Ptz.ep,q~
rH6 ,Nt c,.J:,..I rltLG c;teou,P I JIVe...
B'1
)/)/%'1
I
j
.
i
I
f
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
1
i
I
I-
I
.
I
,
,
I
I
f
I
I
J
,
I
I
I
r
GRAPHIC SCALE
150 t:::: 150
~---- -
1.~1
,_._n
,,<.<,'\
S'\~
""
I
VICINITY MAP
-~
MFS
MUNI 'INA_ClAL ~fJlVlCI[" InCl.
4017 "'. _._
.............
T._cuUo . e.g,.,IIl. .2Seo
171&1 .....nH
-11.1.[M;
EXHIBIT .. F'
"\:
.+.
+v
..'"
.~~
~""
q'"
..
..
q"
"
LEGEND
- - - --,...--..
.-.-'
@)
~
--
_.~
-
a__.__
u
@
JtJ-K
..
"'"
o
II:
-'
w
::0
"
:i
~
2
~/:)
/' 7/'
If, 7 17
~~~~.zy
~
(/fJM~~ ~ 7/Z~
~)u:/ ~ d1cJ
I/Jt n/ d$~~ ~e;.., \
It) "-1 / If) ,,--/
TIllS PAGE BLANK
7- ..2
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J I
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Resolution 1& 71 ~WaiVing the competitive bidding process
and approving the Fiscal Year 1992-93 Service Agreement with
American Digital Systems (ADS) Services for the maintenance of
eight sewage flow meters and appropriating an additional
amount of $8,104 ~,~
Director of Public W:~\~~
City Manager jb \;3 -;.~ (4/5ths Vote: YeslNo_)
American Digital Systems (ADS) Services and the City had two service
agreements for Fiscal Year (FY) 1991-92 for the repair and preventive
ma i ntenance servi ces for six sewage flow meteri ng stat ions. The cost of the
service agreement for the six existing sewage flow metering stations will
increase from $17,220 in FY 1991-92 to $23,772 in FY 1992-93. With the
inclusion of two new metering stations which will begin operation during this
fiscal year, the maximum service cost for FY 1992-93 will increase to $30,724..
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the reso 1 ut i on as stated in the title
hereto.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
There are currently three ADS sewage flow metering stations which measure the
flow discharging into the San Diego Metropolitan Sewerage System (Metro). The
City of San Diego is responsible for maintaining two of these metering
stations (located on "J" Street and "G" Street). We reimburse San Diego for
all maintenance costs for these stations. We pay ADS directly for the
maintenance of the Metro metering station which measures flow from the
Montgomery area (CV-l).
We currently have five operational metering stations which measure flow
discharging into the Spring Valley Outfall. We pay ADS for the repair and
maintenance of these stations in addition to CV-l.
The installation of four additional flow metering stations will be completed
during FY 1992-93. Two of these stations, which will be located in las Flores
Drive (CV-8) and Proctor Valley Road (CV-12), will measure flow discharging
into the Spring Valley Outfall. The stations located in "G" Street adjacent
to Rohr Industries (CV-13) and at the Otay Rio Business Park (CV-14) will
measure flow discharging directly into the Metro system. Two of these
stat ions, CV-8 and CV -13, wi 11 need to be added to our maintenance contract
for FY 1992-93. The developer will pay the first year's maintenance cost for
CV-14, and we do not expect any flow from the Otay Rio Business Park during
this fiscal year.
1/-/
Page 2, Item ,1,1
Meeting Date 7/21/92
The foll owi ng is a summary of the sewage flow meteri ng stations for Chul a
Vista:
Name
Location
Pavs for Services
CV-l
CV-2
CV-3
CV-5
CV-7
CV-9
CV-I0
CV-ll
CV-8*
CV-13*
CV-12
CV-14
Hollister Street (Montgomery Area)
'J' Street, off of 1-5
'G' Street, off of 1-5
East Flower Street, Bldg. 25
Plaza Bonita Road
No. 5th Avenue, No. of C Street
Acacia Avenue @ Bonita Road
Otay Lakes Road & Bonita Road
Las Flores Drive
'G' Street, adjacent to Rohr Ind.
Proctor Valley Metering Station**
Otay Rio Business Park**
Chula Vista
San Diego
San Diego
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Chula Vista
Developer
Developer
* These two metering stations are not in operation, however they will come on
line during FY 1992-93.
** These two metering stations will not be included in the FY 1992-93 service
agreement because the service will be paid for by developers.
The City of Chula Vista had two service agreements with ADS Service during FY
1991-92 for the repair and preventive maintenance of the six existing sewage
flow meters. On November 7, 1991, the City Manager approved the service
agreement for FY 1991-92 with ADS Services for the five existing Spring Valley
metering stations and an additional metering station (CV-B) which we
anticipated would be installed during the fiscal year. The total service cost
for the metering stations was $14,520, with an additional pro-rated monthly
charge of $225 for the future metering station, CV-B. Metering station CV-B
did not come on line during FY 1991-92.
The second agreement was for the one metering station located in the
Montgomery Area and connected to the Metro System (CV-l). The Purchasing
Agent approved the FY 91-92 servi ce agreement for thi s meteri ng stat i on at a
cost of $2,700. The total maintenance cost during FY 1991-92 under both
agreements was $17,220. The term of both servi ce agreements for FY 91-92
ended June 30, 1992.
ADS has performed the maintenance on these sewage flow meters through service
agreements for both the City of Chula Vista and San Diego since the meters
were fi rst i nsta 11 ed. We recommend that ADS continue to do the maintenance
for the following reasons:
1. ADS computer software and compatible hardware is required to perform many
of the maintenance functions.
I /~,;"
Page 3, Item II
Meeting Date 7/21/92
2. The ADS permanent flow meters are unique and special training, parts, and
equipment are required to perform the maintenance.
3. City of San Diego staff indicates that no other contractor in the San
Diego area performs maintenance on permanent ADS metering stations.
The original agreement with ADS was a "sole source" agreement because of
compatibil ity requirements for software and monitoring equipment. Because no
other contractor in the area performs ma i ntenance on permanent ADS stations,
and because all participating agencies in the Metro system use ADS to
quarterly calibrate the system to give uniform flow results between the
agencies, it is recommended that the competitive bid process be waived for
this contract.
For FY 92-93, the language of the agreement is almost identical to last year's
agreement. The changes wi 11 be: 1) combi ni ng the agreements for the si ngl e
meter in the Montgomery Area and the meters connected to the Spri ng Vall ey
outfall into one agreement; 2) an increase in the maintenance cost due to
CAL-OSHA requi rements. CAL-OSHA requi res three-person fi e 1 d crews for
confined space entry, where in the past only two-person crews were used by ADS
Servi ces; 3) del et i ng reference to passage of the Fourth Amendment to the
Spring Valley Agreement, since this amendment was passed; 4) addition of CV-13.
In order to provi de the necessary preventive ma i ntenance on the sewage flow
meters, we recommend that the servi ce agreement be retroact i ve to July I,
1992. ADS Services has informed the City that they would be willing to cover
any servi ce work done between July 1, 1992 through the date of execut i on of
the service agreement without any lapse in service if the retroactive
provision is enacted. If this provision is not exacted, any service work done
during this time period would be billed to the City of Chula Vista at a labor
rate of $175 per hour.
When the sewer budget for FY 92-93 was being prepared, City staff had not been
informed by ADS Services of the increased rates. Consequently, the amount of
$22,620 was originally budgeted for FY 92-93. An additional $8,104 will need
to be appropriated in order to provide service for all existing six metering
stations and the additional two metering stations.
Installation of the Spring Valley flow meters has proven to be cost
effect i ve. By the end of December 1991, flow to the Spri ng Valley outfall
based on the estimated flow per equivalent dwelling unit of 265 gallons per
day was 2.26 mill ion gallons per day (MGD). Flow based on metering results
was 1.844 MGD. 8ased on Spri ng Valley's operat i on and maintenance charge of
$963.40 per MG, our est imated savi ngs was approxi mately $36,070 per quarter
during FY 91-92.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total amount of the servi ce contract for FY 92- 93 is
$30,724. For the single meter in the Montgomery Area, $2,700 was appropriated
from Fund 223 for FY 92-93, and for the five other metering sites including
CV-8, $19,920 was appropriated from Fund 225 for FY 92-93. An additional
appropri at i on in the amount of $8,104 wi 11 be needed from Fund 225. The
additional funds should be placed in account 225-2250-05202.
BVH: KY-073-02, KY-074-02
WPC 6068E
1/~3//I-lf
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR SEWER FLOW MONITORING EQUIPMENT
This Service Agreement, dated this _ day of , 1992 defines the services offered and
the terms and conditions relating thereto with respect to the Agreement entered into by and
between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA (CITY) with offices located at 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, California 92010 and ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. (ADS) with
offices located at 7243 Engineer Road, Suite D, San Diego, California 92111
Products
Serviced by
ADS:
1.
ADS will provide all service under the terms and conditions
specified in this Agreement for the ADS equipment installed at
the locations listed in Appendix A.
Products
Serviced By
Others:
2.
ADS is not responsible for service or repairs for central
computer, peripherals and other related equipment not provided
by ADS.
Services
Performed By
ADS:
3.
ADS will perform the following services on equipment ADS
provides:
Diagnostics:
a.
ADS personnel will perform remote diagnostic check-out
of ADS provided equipment using ADS' most current
procedures and programs from ADS' facilities in San
Diego, California, or other service locations, by use of
telephone lines.
Repair:
b.
ADS personnel will perform repair and maintenance
services necessary to keep the equipment operating.
These services will be performed both in the field by
crews operating from the ADS service facilities in San
Diego California, or other service locations. The
services to be performed under this Agreement include
but are not limited to the following:
General maintenance and sensor cleaning;
Repair of electronic failure internal to the equipment;
Repair of telephone telemetry system failure internal to
the equipment, and repair of any defects in the ADS
installed telephone line from the monitor to the telephone
company pedestal;
Ultrasonic depth sensor replacement: a depth sensor
shall be replaced if, after cleaning, the sensor has less
than three (3) operating ultrasonic crystals or less than
five (5) reporting sensor pairs;
Page I of 7
//....-.5
Primary
Contact:
Response Time:
Quarterly
Maintenance
Visits:
Inventory:
Service
Statement:
Service
Schedule:
Services
Performed by
CITY:
Interface:
Assistance:
Velocity sensor replacement: a velocity sensor shall be replaced
upon sensor failure, or if velocity measurements are reported as
a constant or incorrect value, indicating a sensor malfunction.
Surcharge sensor replacement: a surcharge sensor shall be
replaced if it fails;
Battery replacement when the + 12V is less than IO:OV
c.
ADS shall designate a field service representative who
shall be the primary contact with CITY for the resolution
of field problems. Written notification of any change of
this primary contact will be provided to CITY by ADS.
d.
ADS will respond to a notification of malfunction within
two (2) working days and within an additional two (2)
working days ADS will repair equipment, or replace with
a temporary unit until repair and installation of original
equipment can be performed. The designated field
representative will notify the CITY of the service
schedule at least 24 hours prior to anyon-site visit.
e.
ADS will provide once per quarter site visits to perform
an hydraulic calibration, an electronic calibration,
confirmation and hardware checks at each site.
f.
ADS shall maintain an adequate supply of parts, sensors,
electronic boards and monitors for use in servicing the
CITY'S system.
g.
ADS will provide a Statement of Repair Service Form
which documents maintenance or diagnostics performed
by ADS.
h.
The field service shall accommodate CITY's normal
operating hours of 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon and 1:00
p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
4.
CITY agrees to perform the following functions in connection
with this Agreement. CITY agrees that certain activities must
be acknowledged prior to ADS having any obligation to perform
services enumerated in Paragraph 3 hereof. The CITY shall:
a.
Make no changes to the equipment or software that
would preclude ADS from being able to interface with
the equipment via telephone with CITY'S equipment
unless agreed to by ADS in writing;
b.
Not make repairs or provide any maintenance assistance
Page 2 of 7
I j--t,
Access:
Compensation:
Payment Terms:
Exclusions:
or attempt to do so on the equipment unless authorized
by ADS;
c.
Allow ADS to access the system for purposes of running
diagnostic tests and performing other functions in the
course of maintenance testing and checkout. The CITY
agrees to have available upon request by ADS any data
or monitor information which would assist in the
diagnostic procedure.
5.
Compensation for services as detailed in this Agreement shall be
based on the prices listed in Appendix B. Total compensation
shall not exceed $ 30,724.00.
6.
Invoices shall be issued quarterly in advance with payment due
thirty (30) days from date of the invoice. A 1 % discount may
be taken if paid within ten (10) days, with full amount due prior
to the start of the quarter. A late payment penalty of 1.5% per
month shall be charged if payment is not received within 30
days of the invoice date.
7.
The following equipment and services shall be excluded by ADS
from this Agreement.
a. Communications and electrica1line work external to the
equipment;
b. Changes or alterations in specifications;
c. Painting, refinishing or furnishing materials therefore
(except as damaged by ADS during service work);
d. Installation, moving, or removing of equipment unless
required as part of the repair process;
e. Repairs or loss of data made necessary by accident or
negligence of the CITY, its employees, agents,
contractors or invitees;
f. Repairs made necessary due to attempts by CITY to
repair or maintain the equipment unless authorized by
ADS;
g. Service during holidays or service not included in this
Agreement. Holidays are defined as the following days:
New Years Day, Martin Luther King Day, Presidents
Page 3 of 7
//-7
Service
Agreement
Term:
Renewal:
Discrimination:
Insurance:
Day, Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day,
Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
h. Maintenance and repair of equipment not listed in
Appendix A;
1. Repairs made necessary due to events beyond ADS's
control such as, but not limited to, construction by others
that cuts the telephone line or acts of God (e.g. lightning
strikes, etc.).
Should the CITY elect to engage ADS, ADS upon written notice, can
provide the above services on a time and materials basis.
Compensation for services shall be performed on a time and materials
basis and shall be compensated at the hourly rates listed in Appendix B.
8. This Agreement shall be for a term as described in Appendix A
for the equipment in the locations as listed in Appendix A. This
Agreement shall expire on June 30, 1993.
9. CITY and ADS may renew this agreement for an additional year
at the then current ADS published price. ADS will notify the
CITY of the then current price sixty (60) days prior to the
expiration of this Agreement. The City may then renew this
Agreement by giving written notice of such election at least
thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of this Agreement. In
subsequent years the Agreement may be renewed in like fashion.
10. ADS shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant
for employment because of race, religion, color, sex or national
origin. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to the
following: employment, upgrading, advertising, layoff or
termination, rates of payor other forms of compensation; and
selection for training including apprenticeship.
11.1 ADS shall indemnify and hold harmless the CITY against and
from any and all damages to property or injuries to or death of
any person or persons including property and employees or
agents of the CITY and shall defend, indemnify and save
harmless the CITY, its officers, agents and employees, from any
and all claims, demands, including Workers' Compensation
claims, of or by anyone whomsoever, arising from any negligent
or intentional acts of ADS pursuant to this Agreement.
11. 2 ADS shall maintain comprehensive general liability and property
damage insurance covering all operations hereunder of ADS, its
agents and employees including but not limited to premises and
Page 4 of 7
/I'~
Employees
Assignment
Disputes
automobile, with minimum coverage of one million dollars
($1,000,000.00) combined single limits. Evidence of such
coverage, in the form of a Certificate of Insurance and Policy
Endorsement which names the CITY as Additional Insured shall
be submitted to the City Clerk at 276 Fourth Avenue prior to
beginning of work. Said policy or policies shall provide thirty
(30) days written notice to the City Clerk of Cancellation or
material change.
11.3 Worker's Compensation Insurance: ADS shall carry Workers'
Compensation insurance in statuary amount and employee's
liability coverage in the amount of five hundred thousand dollars
($500,000.00); evidence of which is to be furnished to the CITY
in the form of a Certificate of Insurance prior to beginning of
work.
11.4 All insurance carriers shall comply with the items listed below:
11.4a Listing by the State Insurance Commission as a company
authorized to transact the business of insurance in the
State of California.
11.4b A Best's Rating of "A", Class V, or better.
11.4c Where a company is not included in Best's, it must show
by convincing evidence that its financial responsibility is
equal to or better than the rating set forth in "b" above.
12.
That ADS warrants that he has not employed or retained any
company or person, other than a bona fide employee working
solely for ADS, to solicit or secure this Contract, and that he
has not paid or agreed to pay any company or person, other
than a bona fide employee working solely for ADS, any fee,
commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gifts, or any other
consideration, contingent upon or violation of this warranty the
CITY shall have the right to annul this contract without liability.
13. ADS shall not assign this Agreement in whole or in part without
prior written consent of the CITY. This Agreement consists of
professional services and is not contemplated by either party that
any such assignment would occur. Any such assignment shall
not relieve ADS of any of its obligations under this Agreement.
14.1 In the event of any disputes between the parties, the prevailing
Page 5 of 7
//,1
Tennination
Software
party shall recover its attorney fees, and any costs and expenses
incurred by reason of such dispute.
14.2 All questions concerning this execution, validity or invalidity,
capacity of the parties, and the performance of this Agreement,
shall be interpreted in all respects in accordance with the laws of
the State of California.
14.3 If, through any cause, ADS shall fail to fulfill in a timely and
proper manner his obligations under this Agreement, or if ADS
shall violate any of the covenants, agreements, or stipulations of
the Agreement, CITY shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to ADS of such termination
and specifying the effective date thereof, at lease five (5) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished or unfinished documents, data studies, survey,
drawings, maps, reports, and other materials prepared and/or
installed by ADS shall at the option of CITY, become the
property of the CITY and ADS shall be entitled to receive just
and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
completed on such documents and other materials up to the
effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the
amounts payable under Appendix "B" herein.
15. CITY may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason by giving written notice to ADS of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished and unfinished documents and other materials and/or
equipment described in Section 3 hereinabove, shall, at the
option of the CITY, become the CITY's sole and exclusive
property. If the Agreement is terminated by CITY as provided
in this paragraph, ADS shall be entitled to receive just and
equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on
such documents and other materials to the effective date of such
termination. ADS hereby expressly waives any and all claims
for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement
except as set forth in Section hereinabove, in the event of such
termination.
16. For a period of one (1) year from start of Service Agreement,
software support is provided to those who have received the
ADS Quadrascan software training. The support includes hot
line telephone access and appropriate software upgrades.
Page 6 of 7
/ / - /tJ
Claims
17. Administrative claims requirements and procedures: No suit
shall be brought arising out of this Agreement, against the
CITY, unless a claim has first been presented in writing and
filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of
Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the provisions
of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth
herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
By:
Title:
Title:
Date:
Date:
ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.
By:
Title:
Date:
Page 7 of7
11'1/
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR SEWER FLow MONITORING EQUIPMENT
APPENDIX A
SCHEDULE OF EQUIPMENT AND LoCATIONS
This Schedule of Equipment and Locations defines the units included by the Comprehensive
Service Agreement between ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. and THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA.
Equipment consists of the following:
Alpha Location Service Service Equipment Phone Number
Numeric Start Date End Date
I. CV-l Hollister Street, 07/01/92 06/30/93 2000 monitor, (619) 429-7285
behind pumphouse 1 ultrasonic
depth sensor
I. CV-5 E.Flower, Bldg.25 07/01/92 06/30/93 3500 monitor, (619) 476-8332
1 ultrasonic
depth sensor
2. CV-9 N.5th Ave.,N.of CSt. 07/01/92 06/30/93 3500 monitor, (619) 476-9793
I ultrasonic
depth sensor
3. CV-I0 Acacia Ave. @ Bonita 07/01/92 06/30/93 3500 monitor, (619) 475-6768
Rd. I ultrasonic
depth sensor
4. CV-ll Otay Lakes Rd.& 07/01/92 06/30/93 3500 monitor, (619) 267-8525
Bonita Rd. 1 ultrasonic
depth sensor
5. CV- Plaza Bonita Road 07/01/92 06/30/93 3500 monitor, (619) 476-3433
7(1)+(2)' 2 ultrasonic
depth sensors
6. CV-8 N.2nd Ave. @ Las See Note' 06/30/93 3500 monitor,
Flores Cyn. (KOA I ultrasonic
Campground) depth sensor
7. CV-13 Rohr Industries See Note' 06/30/93 3000 monitor,
I ultrasonic
depth sensor
NOTES:
1. Dual monitoring site
2. Start date has not been determined
A-I
1/-/.)..
COMPREHENSIVE SERVICE AGREEMENT
FOR SEWER FLOW MONITORING EQUIPMENT
APPENDIX B
Price List
This Price List defines the monthly charge for services as detailed in the Comprehensive
Service Agreement between ADS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. and THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA. These prices are based on a three-person field crew to be provided by
ADS. These prices are effective through June 30, 1993.
Monthly Charge: $ 316 per single monitor (CYl, CY5, CV8, CY9, CYI0, CYll, CY13)
$ 401 per dual monitor (CY-7(l),(2))
Hourly compensation for services performed extraneous to the included service described in
the Agreement, when authorized in writing by CITY on a Time and Materials Basis:
Field crew hours are payable at $175 per hour, with ADS supplying all three persons.
The actual compensation, *exclusive Qf CV-8 and CV-13 is as follows:
No. of Price per Monitor Price per Invoice Amount
Service Period: Monitors: iii per Month: Month: * per Quarter: *
I st Quarter FlY 92/93 5 Single $ 316 $ 1,981 $ 5,943
July I, 1992 - Sept. 30, 1992 I Double $ 401
2nd Quarter FlY 92/93 5 Single $ 316 $ 1,981 $ 5,943
Oct. I, 1992 - Dec. 31, 1992 I Double $ 401
3rd Quarter FlY 92/93 5 Single $ 316 $ 1,981 $ 5,943
Jan. I, 1993 - March 30, 1993 I Double $ 401
4th Quarter FlY 92/93 5 Single $ 316 $ 1,981 $ 5,943
April I, 1993 - June 30, 1993 I Double $ 401
TOTAL (Exclusive of CV-8 and CV-13): $23,772
* The charges both for CY-8 and CY-l3 shall be pro-rated to the nearest day based on a
monthly charge of $316/month. This charge shall commence after ADS has shown 30
days of data and has presented the data to the CITY along with a site report, calibration
data and depth-to-discharge data. The date of commencement shall not be prior to August
I, 1992.
B-1
II~ /3( /1- /1
RESOLUTION NO. /~ ?/~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE COMPETITIVE BIDDING
PROCESS AND APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH AMERICAN DIGITAL SYSTEMS
(ADS) SERVICES FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF EIGHT
SEWAGE FLOW METERS AND APPROPRIATING AN
ADDITIONAL AMOUNT OF $8,104.00
The City Council of the city of Chula Visa does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, American Digital Systems (ADS) Services and the
City of Chula vista had two service agreements for Fiscal Year
1991-92 for the repair and preventive maintenance services for six
sewage flow metering stations; and
WHEREAS, the inclusion of two new metering stations will
begin operation during Fiscal Year 1992-93; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to maintain service agreements
on all eight meters which were provided by ADS.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does
hereby waive the competitive bidding process for the acquisition of
this service; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the city of
Chula vista that that certain agreement between the CHULA VISTA, a
municipal corporation, and AMERICAN DIGITAL SYSTEMS (ADS) SERVICES
for the maintenance of eight sewage flow meters, known as Document
No. , a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City
Clerk, and the same is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the amount of $8,104 is
hereby appropriated from Fund 225 to Account No. 225-2250-05202.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Approved as
fJ--~
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
Presented by
(Res\ADSl
II-/S
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / d...
Meeting Date 07/21/92
Public Hearing to Consider Revisions to Chapter 5.20 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, the Cardroom Ordinance.
Ordinance dl...s;;<:J Amending the Sections 5.20.020 and
5.20.035 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
SUBMITTED BY Chief of policV .
REVIEWED BY City Manager_~li V~1 ~~~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..L)
At the City Council meeting of April 28, 1992, Council received a staff report and heard public
testimony upon a proposal to change Section 5.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (CVMe)
known as the Cardroom Ordinance. That staff report addressed, at Council's direction, only a
very a narrowly defined portion of the card room issue. In response to that report, and the
related discussion which occurred at that time, staff was directed to prepare a report and
schedule a public hearing on the subject proposal. During that discussion, six specific Cardroom
Ordinance revision issues were identified by Council and each is addressed in this report. Staff
met informally with card room operators, other members of the community and experts in
California gaming law. The recommendation and alternatives presented below are a product of
those discussions, a review of other jurisdiction's policies on gaming and independent staff
analysis conducted at gaming facilities in San Diego County.
ITEM TITLE
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1. Re-Open a Public Hearing, continued at staffs request from the Agenda of June 30,
1992, to hear testimony regarding changes to the Cardroom Ordinance.
2. Place on First Reading an Ordinance Amending identified sections of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code as follows:
a. Section 5.20.020 extending permitted hours of operations by two hours;
b. Section 5.20.035 redefining the extent of permitted license consolidations.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None
DISCUSSION:
Over the course of the past fourteen months, appellate court rulings and opinions rendered by
the state Attorney General make it legal for card rooms to offer "jackpots" and play the game
of Texas Hold'em poker. These rulings and opinions convinced local card room operators to
submit a proposal to amend the Chula Vista Cardroom Ordinance. This approach is appropriate
since municipalities retain the authority to impose valid controls and conditions upon local
gaming operations (~19801 ofthe California Gaming Act). The card room owner's proposal has
/~-/
Page 2 Item 1.2..
Meeting Date (Y7/21/92
five components: I) to increase the allowable per person/per hand charge; 2) to expand hours
of operation; 3) to offer Jackpots; 4) to offer the game of Texas Hold'em; and 5) increase the
associated Table Tax paid by card room operators for costs associated with regulating these
additional gaming activities.
During the meeting of April 28th, and pursuant to the owner's proposal, Council indicated
concern over the local proprietors ability to remain viable business entities. Staff was directed
to work with the community to develop recommendations that could, if implemented, allow card
room owners more operational latitude without encouraging further consolidation of available
card room licenses. Specifically, Council asked that the following potential revisions to the
CVMC be analyzed by staff and discussed in a report that would facilitate a public hearing on
the proposal:
I)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
allow Texas Hold'em;
allow "jackpots" as long as it would not increase the total amount wagered;
develop language to maintain a minimum distance of six-hundred feet (600')
between two premises upon which cardroom operations are permitted;
develop language to deter/prevent further consolidation of available licenses and
limit any consolidations to a maximum of two;
added days and extended hours of operation; and,
revise the per table tax paid to city, and recommend other fees if so indicated.
The issue of determining to what extent card rooms should be part of Chula Vista has been a
long standing discussion in this community. The Cardroom Ordinance has been amended by
Council Ordinance on no less than five different occasions since 1977. Staff recommends two
amendments to the Cardroom Ordinance at this time: extending permitted hours of operations
by two hours and redefining the extent of permitted license consolidations. Staff does not
recommend additional amendments proposed by the operators primarily due to concerns over
how expanded gambling will impact the Chula Vista community. From the Police Department's
perspective, it is critical to recognize that many components of the owner's proposal have the
potential to alter the existing card room's ownership, transform their clienteles and increase the
Police Department's requisite level of code enforcement activity. Some citizens believe these
changes are inevitable; others feel they are unnecessary and detrimental. Due to potential
actions by the state, it is conceivable that some of these changes may occur irrespective of
Council's decision(s) on the owner's proposal. Staff's primary concern is that any action taken
to expand card room gambling operations will result in a local gaming environment which is
significantly different than what exists today here in Chula Vista.
The Police Department can not support proposed changes to the Municipal Code it is convinced
would encourage non-local ownership of Chula Vista's card rooms. Staff believes non-local
ownership is a very real possibility if existing gambling restrictions are relaxed. This belief is
based upon two reasons: there are numerous investment partnerships willing to capitalize on the
high profits expanded gambling would generate, and the gaming industry in California has
/,). - c2
Page 3 Item / d-,
Meeting Date CY7/21/92
developed a very well organized and funded apparatus which seeks to redefine gaming in the
state. During the past month, staff have had inquiries regarding a "resort casino" from an
investment group known as Donchester International Ltd. of London. Representatives of
Donchester have verified what is apparent to Police Departments county-wide: that San Diego,
especially the South Bay area, has been specifically targeted as a desirable area to develop
gaming resorts. Additionally, the cities of San Diego and National City are in the process of
determining the appropriateness of unsolicited resort casino proposals made by other
partnerships. These resorts generally include a hotel, restaurants and associated amenities along
with the card room.
By virtue of their common goals, i.e. easing gaming regulation in this state and developing
gaming resorts in the South Bay and throughout the state, investors like Donchester Ltd. benefit
from the work of organizations such as the California Card Room Owners Association (CCROA)
and the Californians for Fair Business Practices Committee (CFBC). Both of these organizations
are operative state-wide and are active in lobbying elected officials, and, contributing to election
campaigns as well as a variety of philanthropic causes. The CCROA and CFBC are very well
funded associations which seek to change the California Gaming Registration Act in a manner
that would restrict the "valid local control" doctrine under which card rooms currently operate.
Staff at the Attorney General's office of Gaming Registration believe efforts by the CCROA and
CFBC have been effective and could result in substantial modifications to the Gaming
Registration Act at some point in the near future.
Even if this effort to modify state law fails, should the proposed additional games be granted,
gaming operations would be capable of generating substantially higher profits in Chula Vista (see
Attachment A). If gaming activities permitted in Chula Vista generate a higher profit than those
permitted in surrounding jurisdictions, investors will prefer to invest in Chula Vista card rooms.
This investment preference would increase the value of the limited number of card room licenses
available in Chula Vista. Local operators, acting in their own best interests would be hard
pressed to reject lucrative license purchase offers from sophisticated and well-financed
investment groups. Staff believes that expanding the scope of legal gaming activities makes it
much more likely that non-local entities will be successful in financing and developing gaming
enterprises in Chula Vista. These types of facilities would help create a much different gaming
environment than exists today in Chula Vista.
Additionally, staff is opposed to expanded card room operations, by any local or non-local
entity, because such an expansion would transform the card room's clientele. The revenue
generated for a card room under the owner's proposal is significantly higher than the revenue
generated by the currently permitted games. This additional money must come from one of two
sources: current players or new players. By their own admission, the card rooms in Chula Vista
now entertain a mostly local crowd in a "family" environment. Staff believes these local players
will continue to contribute to card room revenues at a level approximately consistent to that
which is currently observed. Therefore, increases in card room revenues will be funded by new
/~ "3
Page 4 Item J';"
Meeting Date (17/21/92
gamblers, many of whom will come from outside of Chula Vista since surrounding cities do not
permit the proposed games. This new clientele would have an unpredictable impact upon the
community and would also help create a much different gaming environment than exists today
in Chula Vista.
Furthermore, the Police Department is concerned about the impact approving the owner's
proposal would have in terms of additional code enforcement activity. Regulating Texas
Hold'em and jackpots present much more complicated enforcement issues. The City Attorney
has expressed concern over the proper method to codify such gaming. Effectively monitoring
the volume of gaming activity is critical to determine the validity of jackpot payouts. In theory,
all money wagered to fund jackpots (see Jackpots below) should go back to the players in the
form of jackpot winnings. It would be virtually impossible to devise an accurate jackpot
enforcement mechanism -- the city would have no choice but to rely upon the operators to
comply with the code's intent (this issue also arises if the city chooses to employ a percentage
based tax schedule as many cities do). Additionally, without constant surveillance, it would be
impossible to monitor wagering associated with the various forms of Texas Hold'em. Under the
owner's proposal for expanded gambling activities being considered today, staff can not support
the concept of self-supervision of card rooms. Under the owner's proposal a substantially higher
volume of cash flow will be generated by the card room operations and many more thousands
of dollars will be wagered during the course of a day. Large amounts of untraceable cash
introduces an element of opportunity, an otherwise non-existent temptation, to engage in criminal
behavior. The Police Department wants to structure codes and regulations in such a manner as
to create "bridges" that enable reasonable persons to reject the alternative of committing illegal
acts. The existing gambling restrictions and related codes provide that bridge; implementing the
proposed changes will damage the bridge's foundation. It is important to note that none of the
current operators have demonstrated anything other than exemplary business practices under the
current ordinance. The high level of regulation and code enforcement required to monitor the
gambling activities advocated by the owner's proposal would also help create a much different
gaming environment than exists today in Chula Vista.
Staff has contacted persons throughout the community who are interested in the subject of card
rooms. Predictably, their opinions as to the appropriateness of expanded gaming activities are
widely divergent. Card room operators, their employees and most of the players argue that they
need these changes to remain viable and to prevent non-local ownership (the current owners
indicate that without the proposed changes, they may be forced to sell their licenses). Owner's
are convinced that their proposal is reasonable and that these types of gaming activities will
inevitably be permitted. The players enjoy playing locally and adamantly support the owner's
proposal because it will enable them to continue playing cards in Chula Vista on a long term
basis. Additionally, these citizens argue that the additional games will attract more players from
both local and non-local gambling populations which will bring economic benefit to surrounding
businesses. On the other hand, local spiritual leaders, many among their congregations and a
few players and card room employees, do not support the owner's proposal. Theologians argue
/.,2 -L/
Page 5 Item I J.
Meeting Date CY7/211<J2
that adopting the owner's proposal, or any part of it, will undermine the moral and economic
fabric of the community by diverting effort and money away from more virtuous endeavors.
Further, some players and employees are concerned that the owner's proposal will funnel far
too much revenue away from the games and players to the card room owners. Opponents of
the owner's proposal also point out that if, as the owners declare, card rooms are not profitable
enterprises under current regulations, then rational economics would preempt a transaction of
ownership to any entity, local or non-local.
Staff believes that the negative impacts associated with a group of non-local owners, an
expanding gambling population and the attendant regulatory and enforcement complexities
outweigh the benefits which would accrue to Chula Vista via the owner's proposal. Therefore,
staff makes only the following recommendations:
1. Extending permitted hours of operations by two hours from the exiting hours of 10:00
to Midnight to 9:00 A.M until 1:00 A.M.
2. Redefining the extent of permitted license consolidations to limit consolidations of three
licenses to fourteen (14) tables and four licenses to fifteen (15) tables.
The following sections discuss in detail each of the six components staff was specifically directed
to investigate. The recommendations offered above are discussed in detail in the appropriate
section.
1. Texas Hold'em
On March I, 1991, State Attorney General Dan Lungren issued a memorandum/opinion to all
California Cardroom owners, investors and managers. This document indicates that since at
least 1947, stud poker has been prohibited under Penal Code Section 330 (PC~330). It had been
the Attorney General's and Department of Justice's position that Texas Hold'em is a variation
of stud horse poker and therefore is prohibited. In early 1991, an appellate court ruled, "the
poker game known as Texas Hold'em is not a form of stud horse poker proscribed by Penal
Code ~330." Since the state vacated its statutory proscription, allowing this game is a matter
of local jurisdiction. According to local card room operators, Texas Hold'em is a popular game
which is essential to the profitability of their business.
Staff has visited and observed the game Texas Hold'em being played in two of the three
locations in San Diego County where it is known Texas Hold'em is permitted: Oceanside and
the Sycuan Indian Reservation. As reported by the local operators Texas Hold'em is apparently
a very popular game here in San Diego. (Note: The World Series of Poker, which offered a
$1,000,000 first prize, was contested in the Hold'em format.) Both locations staff visited had
a minimum of six hold'em tables operating in the afternoons on which they were visited. Staff
from those facilities indicated that the business observed was normal for a weekday. Texas
Hold'em is played with each player first being dealt two cards face down. Next, three cards are
1;2,5
Page 6 Item I ~
Meeting Date (f1/211W
dealt face up on the table and bets are made. A fourth card is dealt face up on the table and a
second round of betting occurs. A fifth card is dealt face up and a third and final round of
wagering takes place. Players combine their two face down cards with any three of the five
cards face up on the table to create the best hand possible.
Staff does not recommend any change to the Municipal Code to permit this gambling activity.
2. Jackpot Poker
State Attorney General Dan Lungren issued a memorandum/opinion, dated July 1, 1991, which
removed the proscription upon Jackpot poker. This change has not been tested in court,
therefore, the City's authority to offer "jackpots" under ~1980l rests solely upon the Attorney
General's "amended...position" on Jackpot Poker. According to card room operators, jackpots
offered in association with a game of poker would be a significant incentive for local gamblers
to gamble locally rather than at other county gaming centers.
Jackpot Poker is a generic term for the practice of offering a jackpot in association with a legal
game of poker. The jackpot is awarded to two players achieving unusually high hands (typically
when two hands exceed the three king full-house) during one deal of the cards. In order to
create the appearance of more winners, seventy five per cent of the jackpot award goes to the
player with the second best hand and the remaining twenty five per cent goes to the player with
the winning hand. A minimum "jackpot fund" would, in theory, be maintained by the cardroom
operator by offering a jackpot award that never exceeds 90% of the money accumulated in the
jackpot fund. The jackpot fund would be endowed by 25 % of the Operator's proposed per hand
charge, therefore, the Operators will be hesitant to offer jackpots unless the new per hand
charges are also approved. When the jackpot award is claimed a new jackpot amount is
declared. Typically, there is no limit upon how high a jackpot can go, it is only limited by how
many people contribute to it and how long it goes unclaimed. Because it is funded through a
per hand charge, the jackpot would not increase the amount of money wagered by players
(additional information on the proposed per hand charge is provided below). However, staff
cannot confirm that by approving a per hand charge, as opposed to the current hourly charge,
that the amount of money necessary for a player to participate in local poker games would not
increase. Staff observations at various gaming centers indicates that there is too much
differentiation between the time required to play various games, the skill level of individual
dealers and the mix of games that could be offered by the operators to make an accurate
assessment of the true costs to the consumer of playing poker. Nonetheless, money to fund
jackpots and provide additional operator revenues sufficient to justify either of the table tax
increases discussed below must come from the players. Therefore, either new players must be
attracted to the local card rooms or existing players will pay more.
Staff does not recommend any change to the Municipal Code to permit this gambling activity.
/,2-"
Page 7 Item J :J...
Meeting Date 07/21/92
3. Language to maintain a minimum distance of six-hundred feet (600') between two
premises upon which cardroom operations are permitted.
None of the other jurisdictions contacted by staff had such a restriction. Some indicated it could
be dealt with through zoning mechanisms while others indicated they would prefer to encourage
rather than discourage the grouping of card rooms into one business district within the
community. Staff understood Council's rationale for including this restriction to be as an
additional means of preventing further consolidation. The third recommendation, limiting the
number of tables permitted to operate under consolidated licenses is combined with existing
Section 5.20.160 limiting the number of tables at any premises operating as a card room to
eight, staff feels a sufficient deterrent would exist.
Staff does not recommend any change to the CVMC to effect this change.
4. Language to deter/prevent further consolidation of available licenses and limit any
consolidations to a maximum of two.
Section 5.20.035 of the CVMC currently allows for consolidation of Card room licenses in a
fashion which limits the maximum number of tables to eight for the first licenses plus four tables
for each additional license held. Staff proposes to amend Section 5.20.035 to limit the number
of tables permitted in the consolidation of three (3) licenses to fourteen tables (8 +4 + 2) and to
impose a fifteen table (8+4+2+ I) limit in the consolidation of four (4) licenses. This
recommendation would not change the limit imposed by Section 5.20.160 of the CVMC which
imposes a maximum limit of eight tables at any premises operating as a card room. This
deterrent measure would be effective without categorically denying the consolidation of more
than two licenses.
Staff recommends that a decreasing number of tables be permitted to operate under consolidated
licenses as described above.
5. Expanded days and/or hours of operation.
The card room operators have proposed that they be allowed to operate upon any day of the
week and during expanded hours from 9:00 A.M. until 3:00 A.Moo Staff does not recommend
Sunday operations except during the one hour period from Midnight Saturday until 1:00 A.M.
Sunday. Sunday day and evening operations represent too radical a departure from the existing
gaming philosophy for the department to support. Some segments of the community expressed
significant value based opposition to this component of the owner's proposal. The staff proposal
represents a compromise that would allow for two additional hours of operation daily except
Sunday. This would increase operating hours by approximately 14% per day, Monday through
/,2. ~ 7
Page 8 Item / :J....
Meeting Date CY7/21192
Saturday. The staff proposal would provide residents with sixteen hours per day (Monday
through Saturday) and ninety-six hours per week, or 57% of the hours in a week, to play cards.
The limits proposed by staff give operators twelve additional operating hours each week which
had the nearly the same effect as adding an additional day under the existing operating hours
(10:00 A.M. to Midnight). These additional hours of operation will assist the card rooms in
remaining viable within existing gambling regulations.
Staff is recommending that card rooms be permitted to operate between 9:00 a.m. and 1:00 a.m.
6. Per Table Tax Paid to City or Other Fees.
Currently, card room operators pay a $30.00 per table monthly tax to the City. This tax rate
is below that of other San Diego county cities where card rooms are permitted. Gaming
restrictions in the other jurisdictions make it difficult to compare, however, the following table
is presented for comparable card room operations in the other three cities in San Diego county
with operating card rooms: San Diego, Oceanside and Carlsbad.
r.itr
San Diego
Oceanside
Carlsbad
Chula Vista
Annual Table Tax
$9,409
$2,000 & 4% of gross revenue
$2,160 & 7% of gross revenue
$2,160
The fourteen tables now in operation at two local card room establishments generate $5,040 in
taxes annually. An additional fourteen are currently licensed to operate but, at the operator's
discretion, do not. Local card room operators have proposed the following monthly per table
taxes for tables at an individually licensed card room, or, for all tables operated by any single
financial interest under consolidated licenses:
i. $150 monthly for each of the first two licensed tables.
11. add to the above, $200 monthly for the third and fourth licensed tables.
111. add to the above, $275 monthly for the fifth and sixth licensed tables.
IV. add to the above, $375 monthly for a seventh licensed table.
v. add to the above, $400 monthly for an eighth licensed table.
VI. add to the above, $500 monthly for a ninth licensed table.
vii. add to the above, $525 monthly for a tenth licensed table.
viii. add to the above, $625 monthly for all other licensed tables.
The tax schedule described above, proposed by the card room operators, is contingent upon the
City accepting the owner's entire proposal including all forms of Texas Hold'em, jackpots,
increasing the hours and days of operation and allowing them to charge players by the hand
rather than the hour. The proposed tax rate is calculated cumulatively so that an operation
/ :J. ~ 8'"
Page 9 Item I J..
Meeting Date <r7/21/92
licensed for eight tables would pay $150+$150+$200+$200+$275+$275+$375+$400 or,
$2,050 monthly regardless of how many tables were actually in operation. Under the owner's
proposal annual Cardroom Ordinance revenue given the current number of tables now in
operation would be $48,600. If all the licensed card rooms choose to operate, city revenue
would be $100,200.
Staff does not recommend any change to the existing Table Tax structure at this time.
Conclusion
The debate over the card room's role in Chula Vista is a long standing one. Card rooms will
continue to be a controversial community issue due to efforts by the card room industry and
savvy, well-funded casino resort investors. The Police Department can not recommend any
actions to the City Council that staff analysis indicates will significantly alter the gaming
environment that currently exists in Chula Vista. The impacts associated with the owner's
proposal outweigh any benefits that would accrue to the community. The staff
recommendations: extending permitted hours of operations by two hours and redefining the
extent of permitted license consolidations; along with currently permitted gaming activities, will
provide local card room operators with sufficient competitive latitude to remain viable, locally
owned and patronized business enterprises.
The owner's proposal has many components and, therefore, several interesting alternatives exist
with respect to the regulation of card rooms. In the event that Coundl prefers to reject or
augment the staff recommendations, five alternatives are presented below. Although staff
remains opposed to changes to the ordinance other than those recommended, four alternatives
have been prepared which are specifically tailored to previously described components of the
owner's proposal.
Alternatives
Alternative #1: Straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em
Staff would advise that Texas Hold'em be implemented subject to the following conditions:
A. That only the style of Texas Hold'em known as "Straight 3/6" Texas Hold'em be
. permitted in Chula Vista. This style is referred to as "3/6" because the game only allows
bets of $3.00 and $6.00 to be made, no other wager amounts are entertained. Staff
refers to this style as "strait" because the intent is to prohibit "kill" bets (these bets have
)~"'9
Page 10 Item /.)..
Meeting Date 07/21/92
the effect of doubling the wagers required to participate), "hi-lo splits" and/or other
variations of the game as described below. It is recommended that other styles of
Hold'em poker not be permitted for the following reasons. One, according to
representatives of the card room operators, "3/6" is the most popular form of Texas
Hold'em with local card players. Two, other forms of Texas Hold'em such as "No-
Limit" and "6112" generate very large wager pools and are available elsewhere in the
county for high-stakes players. Three, staff presumes that high-stakes games and the
players and tournaments that these variations might encourage could produce significant
community impacts and are contrary to Council direction to focus recommendations upon
providing local card room operators the ability to attract local players.
B. That staff be directed to return to Council with recommendations regarding an
appropriate set of accounting and monitoring programs to effect compliance with the
conditions proposed to limit this gambling activity.
C. That no additional gambling activities take place until such accounting and monitoring
programs have been reviewed and approved by Council.
Alternative #2: Jackpots and Mandatory Recalculations
Staff would advise that Jackpots only be implemented subject to the following conditions:
A. That the jackpot hand and award amount be prominently marked and visible to all
players.
B. That the jackpot award be recalculated prior to the card room opening for the day and
then every four hours at 2:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m.; jackpot awards would be
recalculated at these times unless a jackpot is won during the sixty (60) minutes
preceding the designated recalculation times. If a jackpot had been claimed during the
sixty minutes prior to the predetermined recalculation time, the next regular recalculation
requirement would be waived.
C. That jackpots be funded through a per hand charge to be collected specifically and only
for the purpose of funding jackpots prior to each deal of the cards.
D. That monies from any other card room operation not be co-mingled with money collected
for the express purpose of funding jackpots.
E. That staff be directed to return to Council with recommendations regarding an
appropriate set of accounting and monitoring programs to effect compliance with the
conditions proposed to limit this gambling activity.
/.,2-/?J
Page 11 Item J d-.
Meeting Date 07/21192
F. That no additional gambling activities take place until such accounting and monitoring
programs have been reviewed and approved by Council.
Alternative #3: Texas Hold'em -- Per Hand Fees
If Texas Hold'em is implemented, staff would advise the following:
A. That card rooms be permitted to collect a per hand charge, not to exceed $.50 per player
per hand, in lieu of the current $4.00 per hour charge. This method of collecting playing
charges is more prevalent throughout the county and gaming industry. Under staWs
proposal, permitted games other than Texas Hold'em would charge players no more than
$.50 per hand. Out of the per hand charge 2/3rds would go to the operator and 1I3rd
to fund jackpots. A $3.00 "blind wager" would be utilized exclusively at tables where
straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em is played. Blind wagers are so termed because one player
per hand is identified by a "button" (which rotates one-seat-per-hand in a clockwise
rotation) who must wager $3.00 prior to seeing his/her cards. Out of the blind wager
associated with straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em, $2.00 would go to the operator and $1.00
would fund jackpots as described above. The per hand/blind wager charge appears more
equitable in that every player pays the same amount to play in a game. Under the per
hour method, a player can participate in a few hands, get up and miss the hourly charge
call, then sit back down and continue playing without paying. However, as previously
indicated, staff cannot confirm that by approving a per hand charge, as opposed to the
current hourly charge, that the amount of money necessary for a player to participate in
local poker games would not increase. It should be noted that the amount of revenue
generated under the recommended method varies based on the game being played and the
skill of the dealer. Dealer skills are generally measured by the speed, precision and
efficiency with which the cards are delivered to the players -- faulty deals cost operators
money and customers.
Alternative #4: Texas Hold'em and Jackpots Business License Tax
If Council approves the concept of either Texas Hold'em or jackpots, staff would advise the
following:
A. That no change in the existing Table Tax amount of $90.00 quarterly ($360 annually) for
operators choosing not to offer additional games.
B. That Council pass an Ordinance amending the Master Tax Schedule to authorize the
collection of a Texas Hold'em and Jackpots Business Tax of $15,000 quarterly ($60,000
annually).
/,l-//
Page 12 Item /,;J...
Meeting Date 07/21/92
The Texas Hold'em and Jackpots Business License Tax reflects an attempt to develop a tax
which reconciles the additional games and per hand charges recommended above. Attachment
"A" indicates that the addition of Texas Hold'em, jackpots and the per handlblind wagers as
proposed by will provide a significant increase in revenue to the operators. Attachment" A" also
compares a straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em table to a table offering currently permitted games.
Attachment" A" demonstrates that, under a conservative set of assumptions, a straight 3/6 Texas
Hold'em table operating 16 hours a day would generate nearly $140,000 more in annual revenue
for the cardroom operator than a table playing the currently permitted games. This number
represents a conservatively estimated 87.5 % increase in card room operator revenue under the
owner's proposal. Staff does not contend that any table would be operating sixteen hours per
day for an entire year, rather the one table analysis is offered as a means of putting staff's
proposed new tax into perspective.
This tax would be applied to licenses for permitting jackpots andlor offering the game of straight
316 Texas Hold'em. If an operator chooses to offer the game of straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em,
the total quarterly revenue to the City for an eight table card room operation would be $15,720
($62,880 annually). In the event of consolidated licenses, the tax would be applied to each
license separately in proportion to the number of tables the consolidated license makes available
to the owner. In other words, an owner who had consolidated three licenses and wished to offer
either straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em or jackpots would be required to pay $26,500 quarterly
($15,000 for the first license's 8 permitted tables, $7,500 for the second license's 4 permitted
tables, and $3,750 for the third license's 2 permitted tables). or $106,000 annually. This would
keep the Texas Hold'em and Jackpots Business License Tax consistent with the concept
developed in recommendation #2. Annual Cardroom Ordinance revenue to the City if this
recommendation was in force now, and both operating card rooms were playing straight 3/6
Texas Hold'em, would be $125,760. If all permitted licenses were operating and offering
straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em, annual revenue would be $250,080.
Staff evaluated several alternative methods employed by other cities to tax card rooms: a flat or
escalating table tax; a flat card room tax; a flat card room tax plus a flat or escalating percentage
of gross revenues; or some variation on these methodologies. Each method has its proponents
and detractors, as well as, positive and negative aspects for both the city and the card room
operator. Flat taxes appeal to staff for two reasons: 1) they are predictable and 2) there is no
accounting component. The predictability makes revenue forecasting less complicated and more
accurate and, therefore, assists in the budget development process. Calculating proportions of
gross revenue requires significant staff time to critically review accounting documents from each
of the card room operations on a quarterly basis. Additionally, the staff proposal would provide
additional disincentive to consolidate licenses if an operator intended to offer Texas Hold' em
andlor jackpots. Whereas an operator with one license and eight tables could offer Texas
Hold'em for $60,000 annually, an operator with three licenses and 14 tables would have a
$180,000 Texas Hold'em and Jackpots Business Tax liability.
/;;../.2
Page 12 Item /;;...
Meeting Date 07/21192
A comparison of the staff and owner's proposals relative to an eight table operation is provided
in Attachment "B".
Alternative #5: City Owned and Operated Gaming Clubs
There is a precedent for municipal operation of gaming facilities. However, unless properly
managed, these municipal clubs have similar impacts and raise very similar concerns as do
privately held card rooms. Staff would be hesitant to recommend that the city enter the casino
business. The concept of a municipally held casino would require a very different approach in
order to assess the array of positive and negative aspects resulting from such a venture. In order
to focus the assessment properly, this alternative would need to be explored in a future staff
report.
FISCAL IMPACT: None associated with recommended actions. There is significant fiscal
impact associated with many of the alternative recommendations. Upon
adoption or discussion of such alternative recommendations, fiscal impact
shall be clarified for Council's information.
J.:<-/J
ATTACHMENT "A"
$2.00 Revenue to Operator per hand of 3/6 Texas Hold'em.
30 Hands of Texas Hold'em per hour; average of 33 hands per hour
observed by staff over three hours of total random observations.
$60.00 Revenue to Operator per table per hour.
16 Proposed number of operating hours per day (9:00 am to 1:00 am).
$960.00 Revenue to Operator daily each 3/6 Texas Ho1d'em table.
6 Days open per week.
$5,760.00 Revenue to Operator per week, per straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em table.
52 Weeks in a year.
$299,520.00 Revenue per straight 3/6 Texas Hold'em table per year.
$4.00 Dollars per Hour under current Ordinance (See 5.20.190).
8 Players per game (estimated, maximum allowed).
16 Proposed number of operating hours per day (9:00 am to 1:00 am).
$512.00 Revenue to Operator daily each non-Texas Hold'em table.
6 Days open per week.
$3,072.00 Revenue to Operator per week.
52 Weeks in a year.
$159,744.00 Revenue per non-Texas Hold'em table per year.
$139,776.00 Net Revenue Increase Per Table Under the Owner's Proposal
1,.2-jJl
ATTACHMENT C
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 04/28/92
SUBMITTED BY
Cardrooms Provisions; Report Regarding Recent Changes in State
Law Providing for Additional Gaming Options.
Chief of Police .~
ITEM TITLE :
REVIEWED BY
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.x)
Referral No. 2549
Pursuant to Oral and Written Communications received by Council, Staff was directed to
investigate any recent changes to state laws that have gone into effect since this issue was last
discussed by Council (January 23, 1990). Council specifically directed staff not revisit the entire
Cardrooms subject and to focus upon new gaming options that were the result of such changes
to state law. Municipalities still retain the authority to impose controls and conditions upon local
gaming operations. Staff does not support any changes to the existing Cardrooms Ordinance at
this time.
RECOMMENDATION: Do not amend existing Cardrooms Ordinance.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None
DISCUSSION:
On March I, 1991, State Attorney General Dan Lungren issued a memorandum/opinion to all
California Cardroom owners, investors and managers. This document indicates that since at
least 1947, stud poker has been prohibited under Penal Code Section 330 (Pq330). It has been
the Attorney General's and Department of Justice's position that Texas Hold'em is a variation
of stud horse poker and therefore is prohibited. In early 1991, an appellate court ruled, "the
poker game known as Texas Hold' ern is lli11 a form of stud horse poker proscribed by Penal
Code ~330." A similar document dated July 1, 1991 removed the proscription upon Jackpot
Poker. This change occurred when the Attorney General's office "amended its position" on
Jackpot Poker.
These decisions provided an opportunity for Cardroom owners to petition their local authorities
for permission to offer Texas Hold' ern. Although the state's proscription of Texas Hold' ern has
been removed, ~ 19801 of the California Gaming Act states in part that, "nothing in this chapter
/,,2-/t,
Page 2 Item
Meeting Date 04/28/92
shall be construed to preempt the authority of any city... from imposing valid local controls or
conditions on gaming." ~19824 of the Gaming Act further states that, "The provisions of this
chapter shall not prohibit the enactment, or enforcement of any ordinance by any...city related
to gaming clubs." Therefore, before cardroom owners can offer additional gaming options, the
Council will need to take action to amend the Cardrooms Ordinance.
Reacting to the previously mentioned appellate court ruling, Cardroom owners made the
following four point proposal via Written Communications in early September: I) to increase
the per person/per hand charge; 2) to expand hours of operation; 3) to offer Jackpot Poker; and,
4) to offer the game of Texas Hold'em. The proposal provides for increased fees associated
with these additional gaming activities. This proposal is premised upon the notion that due to
increased gaming at other San Diego County gaming centers, Chula Vista clubs need to offer
more games and enticements in order to remain viable. Per Council direction, only components
#2 and #4 (amending the Ordinance to allow Jackpot Poker and Texas Hold'em) are addressed
in this report.
The Police Department has determined that there is no compelling rationale to amend the
Ordinance to allow Jackpot Poker or Texas Hold 'em. The Police Department believes the
current Cardrooms Ordinance is appropriate. The Ordinance provides an adequate means for
citizens of the community to gamble locally. The fees charged to cardroom licenses are
reasonable and cover the cost of enforcing the Ordinance and investigating related complaints.
Furthermore, the Police Department is skeptical of the motivation driving this request: as was
the case in January of 1990, Staff has been advised that overtures to purchase each of the
operating cardroom licenses have been made (it is Staffs belief that these are bona fide offers).
Allowing additional gaming activities will increase the market value of a cardroom license.
Finally, there is no demonstrated benefit to the community in allowing either option.
Cardroom owners will likely argue that if the City values its gaming industry and the jobs it
produces, it should allow these games. The owners may assert that without Jackpot Poker,
Texas Hold'em and the remainder of their increased gaming activities proposal, they will be
unable to compete with other county gaming centers for business. The point of this argument
being that if they are unable to compete with other county gaming centers, local owners will be
forced to close their doors, or, sell their licenses to the highest bidder; and, that the highest
bidder may be a non-local entity who may bring in employees from outside the community.
While this line of reasoning seems sound, it must be examined in the context of the entire
cardroom issue. According to ~5.20 of the Municipal Code, the Chief of Police and ultimately
City Council, make the determination who may operate a cardroom in Chula Vista. If licenses
are transferred, the applicant must meet, ".. .all of the requirements for the initial issuance of
such a cardroom license." (see ~5.20.030) Therefore, it is presumable that the Chief of Police
or City Council would appropriately deny applications should, ... "there appears (sic) to be good
/.2 -/7
Page 3 Item
Meeting Date 04128/92
cause why such person should not operate a cardroom." (see ~5.20.060) Therefore, the Police
Department is comfortable with non-local ownership under the existing gaming restrictions.
Additional background on this subject is provided in the Attachments to this document.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There is no fiscal impact associated with the rejection of additional
gaming options now available as a result of recent changes in state
law.
/.,2 -)~
ATTACHMENT "B"
COMPARISON OF PROPOSED QUARTERLY TABLE AND BUSINESS
LICENSE TAXES
July 21, 1992
PROPOSALS INCLUDE JACKPOTS AND STRAIGHT 3/6
TEXAS HOLD'EM
Tables Current Ordinance Owner's Proposal Staff Alternative
1 $90 $150 $15,090*
2 $90 $150 $90
3 $90 $200 $90
4 $90 $200 $90
5 $90 $275 $90
6 $90 $275 $90
7 $90 $375 $90
8 $90 $400 $90
Total $720 $2,025 $15,720
Increase 0 181 % 676%
*
First $15,000 represents the staff alternative proposal of a new Texas Hold'em and
Jackpots Business License Tax.
I~ ~/5' / 1).- '8
ORDINANCE NO. ~r.J.:]
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY
AMENDING SECTION 5.20.120 TO EXTEND THE HOURS
OF OPERATION OF A CARDROOM BY TWO HOURS AND BY
AMENDING SECTION 5.20.035 TO REDUCE THE NUMBER
OF PERMISSIBLE TABLES ALLOWED WHEN A CARDROOM
IS OPERATED UNDER CONSOLIDATED LICENSES.
WHEREAS, section 5.20.120 prohibits the operation of any
cardroom and card table from being operated between the hours of
Midnight to 10:00 A.M.; and,
WHEREAS, the Council believes that it is appropriate to
extend the permitted hours of operation by two (2) hours such that
the cardrooms and card tables do not operate after 1:00 A.M., nor
sooner than 9:00 A.M.; and,
WHEREAS, the consolidation of licenses is currently
permitted under section 5.20.035 but that the maximum number of
tables permitted in the operation of consolidated licenses is
reduced such that each additional consolidated license after the
original one only permits the operation of four additional tables;
and,
WHEREAS, the Council believes that it is appropriate to
reduce the number of tables where three or more licenses are
consolidated such that when three licenses are consolidated,
instead of permitting the operation of sixteen tables, that only
fourteen tables should be permitted and that when four licenses are
consolidated, instead of permitting twenty tables, that only
fifteen tables should be permitted; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
section I: section 5.20.120 (Hours and Days of
Operation) is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.20.120 Hours and days of operation.
No card table licensed under the provisions of this code
which is maintained or operated in connection with any other
business shall be used for any card game from lIIidRi~htone
o'clock a.m. to ~ nine o'clock a.m. of any day. All places
which are devoted exclusively to the operation or maintenance
of a card table business shall be kept closed each day from
lIIidRi~htone o'clock a.m. to ~nine o'clock a.m. No card
table shall be used for any card game on Sunday.
IrJ -Ii
section II: section 5.20.035 (Consolidation-Permitted)
is hereby amended to read as follows:
5.20.035 Consolidation-Permitted.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 5.20.160
regarding the maximum number of tables on premises, a person
having an interest or holding a license to any cardroom in the
city may apply for an additional available license or may
acquire a financial interest in an additional license in
accordance with the procedures set forth in this chapter. If
such application is granted, the maximum number of tables
permitted in the consolidation of two cardrooms is twelve
(12). The maximum number of tables permitted in the
consolidation of three cardrooms is sil!~eeR (1€)fourteen (14).
The maximum number of tables permitted in the consolidation of
four cardrooms is ~~CRty (2e)fifteen (15).
Consolidation occurs whenever a cardroom licensee or a
person having a financial interest in a cardroom obtains a
license to operate an additional cardroom or acquires a
financial interest in an additional cardroom
Bruce M. Booga
City Attorney
Presented by:
Richard Emerson
Chief of Police
B:\poker2.wp
/eJ. ... :1..0
c0~f}V 1;2
South 13ay ~cumenica[ Council
P.O.13ol'( '2ffrgFIVED
Cnura 'V'is~~9A>9-H :25
CITY 0;: t,j~i. '/IST A
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
July 17, 1992
~~yor Ti~ Xader and City Co~ncil
276 Fo~rt~ Avenue
Ctela Vista, Califo~nia 91910
.~;.c.; Se.:ticn 5,20 C~,.rKC, "the C.3..~drDQm Jrliilla.rlce-
)ear Mayor Nader:
On ;'Jly 1::", 1~1~,:'2, the 80l!-::~~ E9.Y E.:umer::.cal CO'-1ncil, \'rith rep:-e3entativ02_S
\'(\ (l Wv- d 0 ""<2-
of 17 Ch(jla V"i-sta area cO:~8rezation~-: r~vie\tled. tbe propo~,ed changes to this
OYi:.iLZAl':ce, Py \..n;&:-:i::1C'j~- vote, t:l~ CO:";~r:il agreed to support t:::'e FDsition
tl-d": th'2 or-di:~s.::'-L::e sb.=~ld n:Jt be ~r:l.~!',dec. to allm.-y" city carcromr.s tD 1~g3.11y
of:er Tex~s H'.Jld 'e~:i b:'l::Ucr ~"ac,k?Gt Poker. It is the COlJn.:il's position that
c..r,y :::1.!:.:ll e:q.i0:1Sic~-i of C:c.rdroom activities would ba\~e a detrimo::rrta.l effect
2U cur cam~u~jty.
Sincerely,
~~
Coralee And~rson, Preside~t
Soutb Bay Ecumenical Council
/,) /~ I
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNCIL REFERRAL
~
7/23/92 " ,/.
ORIGINATOR: ADMI~J
REFERRAL NO:
2632
LEAD DEPARTMENT: POLICE
AMENDMENTS TO CARDROOM ORDINANCE: Staff report and proposed
ordinance to implement recent Council actions regarding cardroom
operations.
MANAGER DUE
COUNCIL DUE DATE 8/11/92
ORIGINATION DATE 7/21/92
ASST. CITY ATTORNEY
REFERRAL DETAIL
Rick, at the 7/21/92 meeting, during the public,hearing discussion
considering revisions to the cardroom ordinance in the Municipal
Code, Council directed staff to return with new language covering a
number of areas of operations including allowable games, jackpots,
methods of charging, and enforceability. Please note that the
Council is particularly concerned that the Police Department's
ability to enforce the new changes and the cost of that enforcement
be included in the report.
DUE TO THE LARGE NUMBER AND COMPLEX NATURE OF THE MOTIONS AND
COUNCIL DISCUSSION REGARDING THIS ITEM (NO. 12) THE CITY CLERK CAN
PROVIDE A VERBATIM TRANSCRIPT TO ENSURE THAT ALL COUNCIL CONCERNS
ARE ADDRESSED.
cc: Beverly Authelet, Cit'y Clerk
-------..-------.
DISPOSITION
COMPLETION DATE:
COMMENTS:
DEPT. HEAD SIGNATURE:
ADMIN SIGNATURE:
;' ;) f 2t1-
I
\
\
\...--
Information requested from 7-21-92 City Council meeting.
Item 12:
Moved by Moore, seconded by Grasser HOrlon to approve city attorney's rerommendation in
Footnote on page 5 and direct bim to come back with an ordinance to disallow consolidation 'of more
than two licenses in one location under one ownership. Approved 3-2 (Malcolm, Nader no).
Moved by Nader, seconded by Rindone to bring back an ordinance to transfer and review to Chief
of Police and ratification by City Council whicb would allow selling and consolidation of corporations
and partnersbips. Approved 5-0.
Moved by Nader, seconded by Malcolm to allow games whicb tbe Attorney General declares legal
except paigow. Approved 4-0-1 (Grasser Horton absent).
Moved by Rindone, seconded by Nader to approve staff rerommendation for additional bours.
Approved 4-0-1.
Moved by Rindone, seconded by Malcolm to grant metbod of collection to be at 50 cents maximum
per band per player. Approved 3-2 (Moore, Grasser Horton no).
Moved by Rindone, seconded by Malcolm to include jackpots. Approved 3-2 (Nader, Grasser Horton
no).
Item 14:
David Malcolm stated we issued a permit several years ago whicb bad a condition tbat if tbe trees
didn't grow up to block certain buildings by this time that SDG&E would plant additional plantings.
Asked for a report back on tbe dead line for this.
Resolution offered by Moore. Approved 4-0-1 (Nader absent).
Item 18:
Malcolm offered Resolution. Approved 4-1 (Nader no)
Moved by Malcolm, seconded by Grasser Horton to accept staffs rerommendation: . Annex to the
Bonita Long Canyon Open Space District. This option would require a bearing witb property owners
of tbe annexed area and tbe Bonita long Canyon District. Staff estimates this action would lower tbe
assessments for Canyon View owners from S680.25/year to S338.92/year. Bonita Long Canyon
property assessments would increase from a proposed S323.20/year to S338.92/year."
Moved by Malcolm, seconded by Grasser Horton to direct staff to work witb tbe developer of project,
at bis expense, regarding replanting of drougbt tolerant plants on H Street and get report wby tbe
developer was directed 10 put non-tolerant trees with the drought tolerant plants.
/~-}-0
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item lJ
Meeting Date 07/21/92
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Consideration of Rate Increase for
Collection and Disposal of Refuse
Resolution ;I~I7/~ Approving Rate Schedules
for Collection and Disposal of Refuse Effective
July 1, 1992 and September 1, 1992
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance;(%
~. '
. . ',)...N
City Manager...j4 ~1c/:;: (4/5THS Vote: Yes_No-1L)
REVIEWED BY:
Since 1986, Laidlaw Waste Systems, in accordance with the Franchise
Ordinance (Attachment One), has been entitled to request an annual
rate increase for the collection and disposal of refuse by filing
with the City a "Notice of Intention" no later than 45 days prior
to the effective date.
Although Laidlaw notified the City by letter dated January 23, 1992
of its intention to apply for a rate increase to be effective April
1, 1992, the notice was defective in that it did not "contain
accurate and complete information satisfactorily supporting any
increase requested" as required by section 9.2 of the Franchise
Ordinance. Subsequently, the change in the consumer price index
was published, the County increased landfill rates, and Laidlaw
submitted information regarding their return on investment. The
resulting proposed residential and commercial rate schedules are
discussed below.
This report addresses the current rate increase request from
Laidlaw composed of an increase (based on the change in consumer
price index) in the operating component of the disposal rate,
continuance of the settlement adjustment from last year, and a
pass-through of the City franchise fee increase. It reviews
actions taken by the City Council last year and their impact on the
rate calculation methodology, discusses a recommendation for a two-
tiered rate schedule to be effective July 1, 1992 and September 1,
1992, and reviews the analysis that has been performed and the
rationale for the recommendation.
The reasons for one rate schedule effective July 1 and a second
rate schedule effective September 1 are as follows:
/;3-/
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
J;j
7/21/92
1. Last year's increase was effective July 1 and the
calculation of the settlement adjustment for the first
year assumed a 12 month period with the second year
adjustment to begin July 1, 1992.
2. The fee for the County landfill, which is treated as a
pass-through in the calculation of the rate for refuse
collection and disposal, is scheduled to increase
September 1, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution approving the rate schedules to be effective
July 1, 1992, and September 1, 1992.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION:
I. PREVIOUS YEARS' RATE REVIEWS
The procedure for rate review was initially established by
Ordinance in 1985 and allows for, among other things, a direct
pass-through of landfill cost increases imposed by the County
of San Diego, as well as pass through of the City Franchise
Fee increase of one-half percent (.5) annually until 1996.
The grantee is also entitled to request an annual rate
increase up to the change in the consumer price index (but not
to exceed 6%) to cover operational cost increases. The
Ordinance allows for the rate request to be administratively
reviewed by the City Manager's office with notification to the
City Council. The City Council may, at its discretion,
require a public hearing for any proposed rate adjustment.
From 1986 through 1990, proposed rate increases coinciding
with the amount of the consumer price increase were reviewed
and approved, with the city Council requiring a public hearing
only once during that period.
II. LAST YEAR'S RATE REVIEW
The Ordinance language states that "the amount of the [rate]
increase shall be limited by the percentage increase since
grantee I s last rate increase in the San Diego area CPI".
During the evaluation of last year's proposed rate increase,
staff determined that Laidlaw was using a different
methodology to implement rate increases than was intended by
the City when the Ordinance was adopted. Since 1986 the
annual CPI increases had been applied against the total
existing rate which includes components for operating costs,
landfill fees, and franchise fees.
13....).
III.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
/3
7/21/92
The proper calculation should have been to apply the annual
CPI rate increases only against the component of the rate
covering operating costs and should not have included landfill
costs and franchise fees which are handled separately as
complete pass-through costs.
Laidlaw cooperated with the City in recalculating and
comparing rate increases received since 1986. This
recalculation resulted in a one-time permanent reduction of
SO.24 in their residential rates. a reduction of approximatelv
SO.08 per vard for commercial rates. and identified an amount
of S305.000 to be redistributed. At its meeting on August 27,
1991 the City Council approved the following redistribution
method:
a. Using $50,000 to establish a City Waste Management Trust
Fund; and
b. Using the balance of the settlement adjustment in the
amount of $255,000 (plus future interest earnings) to
offset rate increases for the next three years. Sixty
percent was used in the first year (1991-92) to reduce
rate increases and twenty percent is to be applied in
each of the second and third years.
The impact of the offset in the first year was to reduce
the proposed residential rate from $11.51 to $11.25.
CURRENT REOUEST FOR RATE INCREASE
Laidlaw is requesting a two-tier rate increase. The first,
be effective July 1, 1992, reflects the normal adjustment
CPI and pass through of the city franchise fee increase.
second, to be effective September 1, 1992, reflects
increase in the County landfill rate.
to
for
The
the
Attachment Two indicates the proposed residential and
commercial rate schedules reflecting the adjustments to the
operating, franchise fee, and redistribution components to be
effective Julv 1. 1992.
Attachment Three indicates the proposed residential and
commercial rate schedules reflecting the increase in the
landfill component to be effective September 1. 1992.
The current residential rate of $11.25 per month is made up of
components for recycling, landfill, other (operating),
redistribution adjustment, and franchise fees. Laidlaw is
requesting a rate increase to $11.67 to be effective July 1
reflecting adjustments to the following components:
1;3-;1
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
I;;
7/21/92
a. An increase of 3.1% based on the most recent change in
consumer price index, to be applied to the other
(operating) rate component of residential and commercial.
b. A pass-through of the increase in the franchise fee from
7 1/2 percent (7.5%) to 8 percent (8%) that is paid to
the City of Chula vista.
c. Inclusion of the second year adjustment, resulting from
the redistribution amount, in order to reduce by $.11 the
amount of rate increase requested.
In addition to the above increases that are proposed to be
effective July 1, 1992, the following component increase is
proposed to be effective September 1, 1992:
d. A proportionate change to the landfill component of 21. 7%
reflecting the increase in the County landfill rate from
$23.00 per ton to $28.00 per ton.
This adjustment for the landfill rate increase has the effect
of increasing the residential rate to $12.41 per month.
IV. JUSTIFICATION FOR RATE INCREASES
a. Conformance with Ordinance
Last year the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2475
which clarified the methodology for calculating future
rate increases for the collection and disposal of refuse.
The Ordinance identifies the rate as being made up of
different components and indicates how each component can
be adjusted.
Laidlaw has conformed with the Ordinance by submitting
schedules showing the components of the rate and
adjusting each component in accordance with the
Ordinance. The other (operating) component is proposed
to be adjusted by 3.1% which staff has verified is the
most recent increase in the CPI, the City franchise fee
is proposed to increase from 7.5% to 8.0%, a portion of
the agreed upon redistribution amount is being used to
offset the proposed rate increase, and the landfill
component is proposed to increase by 21. 7% reflecting the
County's increase in fees.
b. Comparison Rate Survev
During the August 27, 1991 public hearing on last year's
rate increase, council specifically requested that the
comparison rate survey data in future presentations
equalize rates as much as possible. Since rates
throughout the County are based on any number of
I '3'1./
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date
/3
7/21/92
variables, the concern was to not be "comparing apples
and oranges". The rate survey data shown in Attachment
Four -A presents the raw "database" information on the
17 cities, and then compares adjusted rates for Chula
vista and some cities using two comparisons.
In the first comparison (Attachment Four - Bl, Chula
vista is compared with five other cities which have
similar service as defined by the following criteria: a
single contractor provides service, the rate includes a
franchise fee as a percent of receipts, and the
contractor incurs all costs associated with billing
customers and collecting bad debts. Comparison rates
used do not include landfill fee increases for any city.
In the second comparison (Attachment Four- Cl, Chula
vista's proposed adjusted rate is compared only to cities
with a single provider and rates which include franchise
fees. The results of this broader comparison do not
substantively differ from the six-city comparison of
similar service. This information is presented as
further validation that we can accurately assess how the
proposed rates for Chula vista compare around the County.
In general, the results show that Chula vista rates are
second highest for residential refuse and recycling
combined, and lowest (or next to lowest) in recycling
alone and commercial refuse. However, when Chula vista's
"weighted average" rate is compared to the five other
cities with similar service (Attachment 4-Bl, the results
are significantly different. Laidlaw's rates would then
be near the average for refuse and recycling (combined)
and refuse only, and would continue to be the lowest
recycling only rate.
The "weighted average" reflects Chula vista's unique rate
structure which provides residential discounts for multi-
family units, trailer parks and condominiums, and senior
citizens. No other cities surveyed have a comparable
comprehensive discount rate structure for residential
service. In response to Council's concern for comparable
rate information, Chula vista's "weighted average" rate
is only displayed on the rate survey Attachment 4-B.
It is also noted that a number of cities are expecting
rate increases (other than landfill fees) in the near
future and it is not possible to project how those
changes may affect the comparisons.
/3'5'
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
c. Return On Investment
During last year's consideration of a rate increase for
Laidlaw, Council requested staff to include with this
year's report information regarding Laidlaw's rate of
return and other financial information.
Attachment Five is two letters from Laidlaw in response
to the Council's request. Although these letters are
marked "Confidential", Laidlaw has agreed to their
inclusion as attachments to the staff report.
The first letter addresses their return on investment
(ROI). Their estimated ROI for the twelve months ended
March 31, 1992 for the commercial and residential Chula
vista Franchise is 5.8%. Staff have requested details of
the ROI calculation, however, Laidlaw's position is that
the information is proprietary and cannot be provided
without a confidentiality agreement, an agreement which
the city Attorney has advised to be inappropriate for the
City.
The second letter addresses Laidlaw's operating costs and
estimates that their direct operating costs for the total
Chula vista Division increased by 3.5% for the past year.
Laidlaw also mentions they have been downsizing their
organization and there is a freeze on their management
salaries.
v. OTHER ISSUES
a. Effective Date of Rate Increase
The attached Rate Schedules reflect proposed rates that
are recommended to be effective July 1, 1992 and
September 1, 1992. Laidlaw initially requested and has
argued that the rates should be effective April 1 because
that was the effective date historically (except for last
year when the effective date was July 1 because of
prolonged negotiations) and that the three months delay
results in over $50,000 lost revenue to them for this
year and each subsequent year.
Staff's response is that an April 1 effective date is not
required by the Franchise Ordinance. The Ordinance makes
reference to "no more than one such increase may be
implemented in anyone calendar year...". All the
information needed in order to evaluate Laidlaw's
proposed rate increases was not available in time to meet
an April 1 effective date, therefore, staff is
recommending the July 1 effective date.
J 3-"
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
b. Settlement Adiustment
As mentioned previously, a settlement adjustment of
$255,000 was identified last year to be used to offset
residential and commercial rate increases over a three
year period. sixty percent was used in the first year to
mitigate rate increases and twenty percent is to be
applied in FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94.
For the first year (1991-92) this resulted in a reduction
of $0.26 to the residential rate. The balance of the
settlement adjustment after the first year is estimated
to be $120,000 including interest earnings. Applying 50%
($60,000) of this amount to FY 1992-93 results in a
reduction of $0.11 to the proposed residential rate.
This is indicated on Attachment Two in the column titled
"Less Settlement Year 2 Adj".
c. Franchise Fee
section 4 of the Franchise Ordinance provides that the
ci ty' s franchise fee increases by one-half percent (0.5%)
each year until it reaches a maximum of 10%. This is a
"pass through" cost for Laidlaw.
The current franchise fee of 7.5% is scheduled to
increase to 8.0% as of July 1, 1992, as part of the pass
through rate increase requested by Laidlaw.
For Council information, if the franchise fee were
temporarily frozen at 7.5%, then the residential rate to
be effective July 1 would be $11. 61 instead of the
proposed $11.67. The resulting loss in revenue to the
city for FY 1992-93 by not increasing the franchise fee
would be approximately $40,000.
d. Recvclinq Rates
The residential curbside recycling rate is recommended to
remain at $1.10 per household per month (including
franchise fee) although it should be recognized as a
newly calculated rate rather than a continuation of the
same rate components. Council may recall that a
recycling rate calculation factors in more than the basic
cost of service.
That basic cost is adjusted by components which estimate
revenue from the sale of materials collected curbside, as
well as a "landfill diversion credit" offered by the
city's refuse hauler since recycled material does not
require a landfill fee for dumping. In addition, any
grants received by the wastehauler for the curbside
program are applied to partially reduce the rate to the
J3"7
Page 8, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
customer. Finally, starting in the second year of the
program, there is application of an adjustment based on
the past year's actual experience of material sales
(revenue) and landfill diversion credit (participation)
compared to the original estimates.
During the first year of the curbside program, the city
witnessed serious drops in the market prices (revenue) as
many other California cities instituted programs and the
amount of market supply soared. On the other hand,
participation in the Chula vista program was higher than
originally anticipated, allowing for a higher landfill
diversion credit. The tremendous success of the curbside
program is primarily responsible for allowing the newly
calculated rate to remain at a $1.10 rate (including the
franchise fee), even though this rate includes a 3.1% CPI
increase on operating costs per the franchise agreement.
The proposed rate of $1.10 is the lowest rate in the
County for service which is not subsidized by commercial
refuse rates or hauler-provided incentives.
It is also important to highlight that the basic cost of
service has always included $.10 per household per month
for public education purposes because of the critical
importance of that process. It is recommended that the
allocation continue ($.10 of the $1. 10 collected) but the
management of the program and the funds would shift from
Laidlaw to the city, under the direction of the
Conservation Coordinator. This shift would result in
approximately $27,000 annual revenue to the City to be
used for public education programs. Since the City has
established a recycling program infrastructure, this
action would not result in additional staff. However,
the funds would be used for offsetting the cost of
existing staff time, as well as mailers, presentations
and demonstrations, handouts and materials to reach the
City'S 24,000 participants. The public education aspect
of the curbside program is particularly important at this
time (even though participation has been high) because of
the mandatory Ordinance. In addition, the State has
mandated 25% diversion goals by 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If Council approves the proposed rate schedules which include a
pass-through of the franchise fee increase from 7.5% to 8.0%, the
.city will receive an estimated $670,000 in franchise fee revenue
for FY 1992-93. Of that amount, approximately $40,000 is resulting
from the one-half percent increase.
13-8'"
Page 9, Item
Meeting Date
/3
7/21/92
The City will also receive an estimated $27,000 in FY 1992-93 from
Laidlaw to be used to offset the cost of the public education
program for the curbside recycling program and to offset the cost
of existing staff time.
Attachment One-
Two -
Three -
Four
Five
Franchise Ordinance (Includes Amendments)
Proposed Rate Schedules to be Effective July
1, 1992
Proposed Rate Schedules to be Effective
September 1, 1992
Comparison Rate Survey
Letters From Laidlaw Addressing Return on
Investment and Operating Costs
13-9 /13~/D
~ ~
~~
j
?
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
Presented by
The residential and commercial rates
identified on Attachment 3 as proposed for
September 1, 1992 for the collection and
disposal of refuse are hereby approved and
said rates shall be in effect as of September
1, 1992.
This resolution shall take and be in full
force and effect immediately upon the passage
and adoption hereof.
The city Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter
the same in the book of original Resolutions
of said city; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption hereof in the minutes of
the meeting at which the same is ssed and
adopted.
eJt
Lyman Christopher
Finance Director
Bruce M. Boogaa
city Attorney
C:\rs\laidlaw
Ij-/d-.
by
~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY
THE CITY COUNCIL for the purpose of considering:
. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST BY LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS FOR
RATE INCREASE.
If you wish to challenge the city's action in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised
at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on
Tuesday, June 30, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public
Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person
desiring to be heard may appear. For further information contact
Finance 691-5051.
Publish: June 17, 1992 and
June 24, 1992
Beverly A. Authe1et, CMC
City Clerk
'" declare under penalty of perjury that I am
am~'oye:! by the City of Chula Vista in the
OHlc" O~~!:; ,City Clark and that I posted
thIS Atl,c:.....; Noe,ce en the Bulletin Board at
the ~ub:;7'5;h, I a3 BUildin, g and t ity HAil
DATtD, /> 't"- SiGNED . ~
. L
\
\f'j! \~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ft
Meeting Date 07/21/92
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING:
To consider Coastal Development Permit No. 59 for the
construction of two storage sheds and a covered work area at the
SDG&E South Bay Power Plant
RESOLUTION I~,* 8"02. Issuing Coastal Development
Permit No. 59 for the construction of two storage sheds and a
covered work area at the SDG&E South Bay Power Plant
SUBMITTED BY:
Community Development Director
City Manager...jL\ \)~ ~
L_S,
REVIEWED BY:
(4/Sths Vote: Yes
No_XJ
BACKGROUND:
SDG&E has submitted an application to construct two storage sheds and a covered work area
within an existing warehouse area at the South Bay Power Plant site. The project site is located
south of L Street and west of Interstate-5 which is within the Southwest Redevelopment Project,
however, no special redevelopment actions are required. The proposal is a class 3 exemption
from environmental review.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing, take testimony, and
adopt a resolution issuing Coastal Development Permit No. 59 for the construction of two
storage sheds and a covered work area at the SDG&E Southbay Power Plant.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
SDG&E proposes to construct a 120' X 12' X 14' high and a 50' X 12' X 14' high open bay
shed to store various tools, timber, plywood, sheetmetal racks, pipe racks, boiler tubes,
insulation material, and other specialty tooling and supplies. The sheds will be constructed on
an area currently paved with asphalt adjacent to the Operations Services' parking lot at the South
Bay Power Plant.
A 30' X 18" X 10' high pre-fabrication work area will be located on the west side and adjacent
to an existing warehouse near the sheds. This space will provide a rain-free/shaded work area
for welders.
All three buildings will be constructed of corrugated metal. Because of their locations within
the interior of the site, the buildings will not be visible from outside the site. Two m<\ior storage
1'/-/
P.02
P.02
JUL -08-1992 11: 45 FROM SBDO TO 94765310
JUL- 8-92 WED 12: 17 COllllUNlTY DEVELOPlIENT FAX NO. 6194165310
. . 'I'SB ClTTf OF CHULA ~ i?Alirr blSCLOSlIRR sr.f.7'EMENT
StatCDlmt of dlsclOSURl afa:naJn OwnCDhip fntuasts. payments, or O8J1IPafp IlOII1t1butiODS. 011 tIJ1 mattciS
whit'It WI'll toquin: disqetloAll17 actJcm on t1\1l part oftbe at,)' Colmc.ll, PJlInafna Camm.fssion, lUld all otltcX'
ofiicla1 bac11cs. The ~ iafonnatlon mast be discloBed: .
.
I,
Ust 1bc Ull19 of aU persoo. :baring a JinlIncfal interut in the c:cmtract, 1.80, t:OnUllt(or,
aubcontralltDr, mateda1 aupptler,
San DiAeo Gas & El.ot~ie .
1.
If &rJ.'f ~o.n. idemified punuam to (1) above Is 8 ccrpcratlon or partnersl1ip, Jl&t the names or aU
iDdMdua18 OWIlini IJlOrC than 10% of the Ihares in the c:o:poration or ownfng ll1l)' partnership
Jowett In the partnersblp.
'NIA
3.
It any penon ide1ltilled puimant to (1) above II llClII-pRllit cnganfmtkm. Dr a trull, USI the rwnc.a
of any petlan aerving OS director of the non-prol'it organization or as tfu$tee or beneficimy or
tnIatcr or the tnJat.
If/A.
~
-
4.
Hava you bail Dl,Ote than $250 worth of bll$klIa b:~ w.itl1 an)' member of the ClII staff,
Boudl, Oomml&alon... Commitllllc:s and Oounall. VJithin the past ~\fO 1lI0ntht1 Yes_
No......L. If )'eI, pJOI1lle inc:ueate pet$ClJl(s):
Ph:ase identify each aud r.vcry parsan. inc1udlng II1l)' apts, emp1~ cona~ or fndepcndtlnt
~ who }'Ou !lave usigned to reptescnt you \:lefOl'e 11te Q1J JD thll matter,
K/A
5.
6.
Have JOU and/or )'011; ofl5ce!l1 or asem.. iJI. the assrepte, COl\tlibUted DIOnI tblIn $1,000 to a
Ctu-n"...",bec in the current or ~i"8 e1ec:doftp8rlod? Yes _ No.....!.. If,.., atalO vdlSch
Counollmembel'{a);
r
lml!ll15dttln.e4 u: ~1IJ'~pnn. eo.pI1U!f8hI,.jDbu~ -<<rii/lrt, ",dalt.lrt),fttItl:md~ e<<porafi(ln.
a/aIr, "* lIllllMr, ~ thtf l1R4 tNIY 0lMr Ilf.\IIIII)\ r:iI1 tm4!!!11l*1r ~ IIIU#k1pa1try. 4fIltfa G1' ""-1"1kkd 1II11dJ1IkI/Hl,
IN'trllJ' 0III611W1 IN' wmbfntrdOll acting illS tJ urrlt,"
{I'l~~l:ltklIWpap8Sn~
Da",,--o-l 3f /q q ~
S'
y..Il:lWD1SC1.oSll.'l'X'11
.
Jl'clnt or 1fPCl name or contracfOr[app1feaDt
~_: 11/3ONO}
~
TOTAL P.02
Ill; 3
,;,,':;.:;
'~~~"',\.
"' ';. i"~",
.', ~~
I
I
i
" "
~
;;
.
.
."
~
\
\
\
.
'. \
'. .
'. "\
'"
\
,
I
i
.
I
!
J
i
! ;
I .
. ~
I g
. .
! ~
I 0
. z
i ;!(
! a
! z
~ ~
i
~~J;
I
. .~~
~. ",
"':.'>::::-
~
.
.
o
~
/
/J./~'1
~'-7.'_- "
'It.
~
r
,'..:.\
1f.~
"" .
l" .
~
"'alJ
^'",
'" 0
la
t~
'f
6'
1'>
R
'1>
'"\A .
2
vv
""l_
N1OlililO'":_
(" .~l
'Q.I. ,
F' -<>>' ", I ;
.,
~
"2
I. 6
\ll!
"i
~
Q
~
qJ
....;:}
--:>1.
::J
<:l
3
".
,j) '-
:>-q
a:- (),
~"J
<:::<ll
"-,,,,
"-'''J
:';l2
1;:;",
--0 ;U
</1)-
<:<;J
3"2
"
\--..:!
c: \Il
~~
~'.~"I
0... ~
,0 -.!l",
. '- C\u
'-<:\4
8 ~::i ~
~ \I)~
--..J
~
ct
t
I,
~'i1
rj
~r
!
:>
<ll
.,
'"
-Do
/
--/
--.F
l/
"',,'
~::,j
';0",
:3;ri
= -~
0.- ":L!,
3'S:.>Q
~'...'"
!=l 0'
IU.....-.l
~,o'"
~c~
Iv; E E
-. - \-
"':!9:J
~:;jJ
~U1
.. 0'3
~'5 ~ I
~ .~
~ I:::::::Q;
.. r~"3
~~U'::u
)-=~2
<:::V~..n
=;9 -
.", ,
~-n~
::3 """
~~-? '3
~'::l ~
n d
~3~
~p~-:c
<.Ie
~~8~
'"
to ~f;,')-
;- In- '"
::J ,...<:l
r:JQ.;2~
-,,1" ",<l:
-J ::to
- a
C!~;z<
2;ZQ'"
~
'-J
~
:-..
~
<
o
~
~
(:.
"
<;
~
.1
~
-<:1
~
.
N
.....
.,..
.~
~
-
IJl
/1" .5'
/
", . -----
/
" r."
~--
<L "- -
'<i- _
n -
Ii
II
.- r '
~,
"'-
L
. -
-
~
I J
I ;
I
I
I
;\
II
, .-:.J
,
\ I
i I
II II
II
I ,
,
,
\ I I ~
IY)
I
h -
\
I
I I
. - !
-
=:/1 !
,
c: :;~
-i'l I'I-?
'1 --
N
.<1
I>
J
v
,:
",
.~
, ..
k
I
I
I
-
C)
-
tT)
~
co
~I
i ~
. .... "
;r: -.J J
':>~~~
g :J IN ~
v .,lJ " 1:0
r:: ~ ~
, ~ I l
1,
,
!
~
<;;;:
~
~ ~
~ G
'l:
w i1 <l
... "
~ ~ :>
,Q V
::r: ~ ~
W
~ ~ .~
<t: Cl
3 '" IT) ~
"
~ ~
C( ~~
k ~
111
~ t'
Cl... ~
~ ~
, " 't>
D
~
.~
/JI- 7
J-
.~
'"
,;;:
-'-l
~
cJ
~ ~
')
~'l
1""--
~ ~
~ ~
v:, .:j
"
"
..
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 07/21/92
tanks are located to the west of the buildings which block their view from the bay and a
warehouse is located to the east of the prefabrication area which precludes visibility from Bay
Boulevard. An existing 12' high, slatted chain link fence surrounds the paved area where the
sheds are proposed and will virtually hide both buildings from view (see attached map).
Findinl!s
Based on the following findings, the proposed project has been found to be consistent with the
policies of the certified Chula Vista Local Coastal Program:
1. The land use plan designation for the subject SDG&E site is Industrial: General.
Construction of the proposed storage sheds and pre-fabrication work area are consistent
with the land use designation.
2. The project site is owned and operated by SDG&E, a public utility company. The site
is a security area and public access is not allowed. Therefore, the opportunity for public
access to the bay from the site for recreational use is restricted and not inconsistent with
the policies of the certified Local Coastal Program.
3. No natural vegetation or land contours will be disturbed as a result of the project. The
project site is currently paved and developed with various industrial buildings and storage
tanks and no grading is proposed for the proposed project.
4. The project will not interfere with coastal access or traffic circulation since there are no
existing public roadways on the project site and only a minor number of additional trips
will be generated from the project.
FISCAL IMPACT: No significant fiscal impact will result from project implementation. The
buildings are not major improvements to the site for tax purposes. And, any increase in
assessment would be minimal benefit to the City since all cities would share in the increase.
[PBIDISK6IB,ICDPMT59.113]
/O/'J../I'I-i
RESOLUTION I~Jr;J..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ISSUING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 59 FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF TWO STORAGE SHEDS AND A COVERED WORK
AREA AT THE SDG&E SOUTH BAY POWER PLANT
WHEREAS, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
proposed project is a Class 3 exemption from environmental review; and,
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program (LCP) was certified by
the California Coastal Commission; and,
WHEREAS, said Local Coastal Program includes coastal development permitting
procedures determined by the Coastal Commission to be legally adequate for issuance of Coastal
Development Permits; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on July 21, 1992, in accordance with said
permitting procedures; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as approving authority, has
reviewed the proposal for the construction of two storage sheds and a covered pre-fabrication
work area within the vicinity of the Operations Service parking lot at the Southbay Power Plant
site.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, based
on the following findings, that the proposed project has been found to be consistent with the
policies of the certified Chula Vista Local Coastal Program:
1. The land use plan designation for the subject SDG&E site is Industrial: General.
Construction of the proposed storage sheds and pre-fabrication work area are consistent with the
land use designation.
2. The project site is owned and operated by SDG&E, a public utility company. The
site is a security area and public access is not allowed. Therefore, the opportunity for public
access to the bay from the site for recreational use is restricted and not inconsistent with the
policies of the certified Local Coastal Program.
3. No natural vegetation or land contours will be disturbed as a result of the project.
The project site is currently paved and developed with various industrial buildings and storage
tanks and no grading is proposed for the proposed project.
4. The project will not interfere with coastal access or traffic circulation since there
are no existing public roadways on the project site and only a minor number of additional trips
will be generated from the project.
Jo/..."
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista hereby issues Coastal Development Permit No.59.
(5<, <;~
v
Presented by:
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
ruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
[PBIDISK6\RES059.TXT]
/t/,/()
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/5'
Meeting Date Julv 21. 1992
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: - Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-40:
Appeal of Planning commission Approval of a Request
to Install Interim Fire station No. 6 at the
southwest corner of Lane Avenue and Fenton street;
Appellant - California Land Associates
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution Approving PCC-92-40
Director of Planning~~
.1 <
City ManagerJlx '-'\;", ~\ (4/5ths
IJ'/
Vote:
Yes_No-Ll
REVIEWED BY:
staff recommends continuance of this item to the Council meeting of
July 28, 1992 to allow City staff to meet with the appellant to
discuss the issues raised in the appeal. The appellant concurs
with the continuance of PCC-92-40.
1>- /
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /~
Meeting Date 7/21/92
a)
Publ ic Hearing: City Open Space Maintenance District 11 for
Fiscal Year 1992-93 and annexation of lynndale Hills
Subdivision
Resolution I" 7-'.1> Ordering certain open space and
maintenance facilities to be maintained and levying assessment
for Fiscal Year 1992-93 for Open Space District No. 11
Resolution 1~7.?1 Approving annexation of land known as
lynndale Hills Subdivision (Chula Vista Tract 90-6) to Open
Space District No. 11
Director of Public Works~
Di rector of Parks and(R:,creat ion c:r
.' \' Li~\\
City Manager ..JG'I )~f-<," (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-.!..J
b)
In accordance with the City Municipal Code Section 17.07, the City Engineer
prepared reports on the spread of assessments for the open space districts.
The reports were accepted and the required public hearings were set by Council
at its meeting of June 23, 1992. Thi s agenda statement covers both agenda
item numbers 16 and 17.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Assessments
On June 23, 1992, the City Council approved the reports for the City Open
Space and Maintenance Di stri cts prepared by the City Engi neer or under hi s
di rect i on and set July 21, 1992, as the date for the publ i c heari ng. The
reports cover the following districts:
1. Open Space District Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17, and 18
2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
3. Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1
4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I landscaping Districts
The proposed individual assessments for Fiscal Year 1992-93 as they compare to
last year are shown below:
/(, -'I
Page 2, Item J(,
Meeting Date 7/21/92
TABLE 1
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 % Increase
OSD Assessment/EDU As ses sment/EDU or Decrease
1 $ 54.88 $ 42.56 -20%
2 35.90 28.92 -20%
3 357.66 331.10(2) -7%
4 213.80 183.64(2) -14%
5 260.74 226.58(2) -13%
6 136.44 128.00(2) -6%
7 98.36 72.12(2) -26%
8 456.02 408.00(2) -10%
9 96.72 93.62(2) -3%
10 131. 48 83.46(2) -36%
11 86.18 75.18 -12%
14 369.38 323.20(2) -12%
15 229.20 220.54(2) -3%
17 154.58 146.36(3) -5%
18 285.94 282.48 -1%
20 140.58 246.28 +75%
EastLake Ma i nt. Dist. 7.52 6.76 -10%
Bay Blvd. 1189.00(1) 1031. 60( 1) -13%
Town Centre 41. 98(1) 40.94(1) -2%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
(3) Reserve is at 10%
These assessments are based on the budget approved by Council on June 16, 1992.
NoticinQ
Although there is no statutory requirement to do so, staff noticed all
property owners of Open Space Di stri ct Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17, and 18 of the
proposed assessments per equivalent dwelling unit on the postcards mailed for
noticing the informal staff meetings held on June 13, 15 and 20. District 11
(Terra Nova) was also noticed of the proposed annexat i on of Lynnda 1 e Hill s
subdivision and future additional costs of $5-$15/year due to the annexation
on the postcard.
Bay Boulevard and Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting Districts were not
not iced of the proposed assessments on the postcards because each assessment
varies per parcel. However, staff provided the percent decrease on the
postcards.
It,.. .2
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
It,
7/21/92
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 and Rancho Del Rey Open Space District No.
20 were notified by postcard of the informal staff meeting held on June 15.
Neither the proposed assessment nor the percent increase/decrease was included
on that postcard because the i nformat i on was not avai labl e at the time of
mailing. Of the approximate 4,000 parcels within these districts only one
property owner from EastLake attended the meeting.
Staff noticed the public hearing pursuant to Sections 22552 and 22553 of the
Streets and Highways Code which requires notice be published.
Rancho Del Rev Ooen Soace District No. 20
Open Space District No. 20, Rancho del Rey is the only district with a
proposed increase in assessments. The increase is due to the following:
1. The 91/92 assessments were low due to savings which occurred during
FY 1990-91. These savings were used to lower the FY 1991/92
assessments. The savings were due to turnover of open space
occurri ng 1 ater in the fi sca 1 year than ant i c i pated and from actual
contract costs being lower than originally estimated.
2. Additional costs are being spread to the district because of
turnover of approximately 52 acres of open space in SPA 1, Phase 5.
The maximum assessments per equivalent dwelling unit for this district have
been as follows:
FY 90/91
FY 91/92
FY 92/93
$296.42
$140.58
$246.28
Staff has prepared the following summary to be incorporated into the
Engineer's Report for Open Space District No. 20 pursuant to Section 22660 of
the Streets and Highways Code:
II,-J
TABLE 2
Rancho Del Rey Open Space District No. 20
Annualized Costs
Amount Accumulated FY 92-93
Zone DescriDtion (90-91 & 91-92) Amount
DesiLting basin $67,694 $33,847
2 Rice Canyon 13,400 6,700
1,746 873
456 228
3 East H Street 0 0
4 SPA 1 Phase 1 8,004 4,002
(Business Center)
5 SPA 1 Phases 2-6 69,234 34,617
6 SPA 2 0 0
7 SPA 3 0 0
TOTAL $160,534 $80,267
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
I~
7/21/92
Work DescriDtion
Desilting basin maintenance
(every 5 years)
StabiLization structures
maintenance (every 3 years)
Staging area - Ale overlay
seaL and stripe (every 5
years)
Staging area maintenance
(30-year period)
Monumentation
replacement (3D-year period)
Theme wall & monument
replacement (3D-year period)
The Code requires the breakdown outlined in Table 2 for estimated costs
amortized over more than one year. Certain costs are being spread over
several years because of the impact on an assessment which would occur if the
costs were spread over one fiscal year only.
Summarv of Informal Meetinqs
Staff from the Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments held informal
meetings on June 13, 15, and 20 to discuss the proposed assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992-93. Several questions were answered at that time regarding the
assessments and the components affecting the assessments, maintenance and
contractual services. A summary of issues are presented in Attachment "A".
/fOr $UrtJIoIEP
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. All City staff costs are reimbursed by
Open Space District Funds.
DDS:fP/OS-OOl
WPC 6062E
1~"'1
ATTACHMENT "A"
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL MEETINGS
1. One property owner from Open Space District 5 objected to the budget and
the assessment because he bel i eves the negatives, i. e., cost, outweighs
the positives. He also objects that his home overlooks a canyon which is
maintained in a native state and is maintained by a different Open Space
District. He would have like it planted and irrigated.
2. One property owner from Open Space Di stri ct 11 objected to the proposed
annexation of the Lynndale Hills Subdivision because he saw no benefit to
his property.
3. One property owner (Lillian Ritchie) requested that staff investigate the
possi bil ity of detachi ng certain areas wi thi n Bonita Long Canyon from
Open Space District 14. Specifically, she was concerned that the highly
manicured perimeter parkways and medians have high maintenance costs and
should not be spread to her phase of the Bonita Long Canyon Subdivision.
A recommendation is presented below.
4. One property owner from EastLake Maintenance Di stri ct No. 1 (Ed D' Lugo)
raised several questions regarding the laws pertaining to the 1972
Landscaping and Lighting Act. Staff is arranging for him to meet with
the Assistant City Attorney and the Director of Finance to discuss the
issues.
Bonita LonQ Canvon (ODen SDace District 14)
Open Space District 14's budget is $293,600 for Fiscal Year 1992-93. Of this
amount the parkways and medians along East H Street and Corral Canyon Road
constitute approximately $27,700 of that budget. Lillian Ritchie indicated
that she does not use either of the entrances along East H Street or Corral
Canyon and does not want to be charged for thi s maintenance. In response,
staff recommends the following:
1. That all property owners wi thi n Open Space Di stri ct No. 14 (Bonita Long
Canyon Subdivision) be charged for the costs associated with the
perimeter parkways and medians as has been done historically.
2. That charging the entire subdivision for perimeter parkways and medians
is consistent with other districts with similar circumstances (OSD'S 1-4,
6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 18, 20 and EastLake Maintenance District).
3. That any change in the district be deferred until such time that staff
presents to Council a Report on a "Scenic Corridor" District.
WPC 6073E
I"~
CHULA
VISTA TRACT
NO. 90-6
""
"
"
ll> ~\'€.
1~~O' ,
/~. tt.:---
/ '\:'~, /--,
{ -.<5' "'\1''i'-,'~-- \
it:fi~'C-V- '~1t\~ _ _ - - p "
t>.d'5'I, 'O\~ Af>"'''' ...--------:',' __ 0
I V -- .'.J.')-- , ~-- - 0
---- :------- '2-tot>"" va,t;"-----'.;p ~'
~1'~.... '2l <;z<.>&1~/ __ \
_(,.1'2- ~ ->r<'i€- r.: ;.p'P> ~--
~'l6CV'" ' "<;"'VIA\ - -'-,\
~<I-'-P-
t>'~~') _nnnn
D< 5EB"~I"'EOO
-------' ~ - ' .-
C 5:l't.,vY'--------:_,
.".ct\'\>3Ir:Jc,) -
L."r:P 6,eer4C01~CR'l'<
^AAP 166 lJ-75'4aa;,'R-7~:"-::'::' ~ - =-=.
RANCHO oE <A*75'44ia;,' "'" L-!lZ,~ _"''- --
LA NACIOi'l R~'~58'> '
2.45 AC. _ _
/'
/'
~
-",
9-
'-;-
00'.
egQ-
~ !
N _~
""~ 1
~t;
~ '..
\\3 "'_
~-;~
lJ'
".
\
\
I
-<Ii
>
()~
L~
~~
I"
--
--
0'
-'
/'
--
LOT
II
LOT
~""'- IZ
--
/ ~
/", /
'!- /
\~ -- '"
\~~ '"
~
'~
\1
\ ~
I::>
CCfeuJ 2'="
--- ' --
_ \"-N.64i5'Z2"Pl ~e;-[-~---
--~e7t:';54'?;6' NMI20~"J ,-
W, !'l4re' C67'~"
f-U7"44i47'W " ,"" -'025'W.]
- 1/.9.4~ Chl.l7"47'IO' lie> W ,/
, --
-~
'n
'(\
\~
\~
'~
\,'"
'B
, -------
~ ~ ;-t
_o,eOS ~"\ ,0, \
\ \-~y ---= - "^'" ---
",~ ,!IIv--', '
O\"0~_",,eP" I''i'-G .",~oO
01 sp.~- ""' 0, <;'(l\i~") ,
- ~-
~ ~..
COfJVEI<ISEt-JCE. A.
PT ;o:n FDVf-ID ~14
11(0.1 PIPE. WITH ./16
~a~C.e..le.oIO"
't\,O.S.
CO\.l~E->>:e
ANGLE. DEl'AIL
hlO ~LE.
It.-I,
c:.-r
~
..-0\
V1
C.
2-
=\
..J::..
.:
..!..
~
~
roo-'
~~
-.t:('\
~ b
~ (I
~
'---I
a
I"
I
ill
;1,
I"
I
U1' 1I'~I'. 'W' fa
I " 'I III :', . '" . .
~. '~ I ;t ,:
· ....... 'I /~
.' iJ~ J'
:: J J II II II C' ' , . jl/'fl.! iHIJ'I,'r,;!I!,'jiil,; !If(f,!l' H,II III "i.
I I I 111/111 I , 'i' ll" I" r'll '1'1,111, Ij"
II II i /1111 ~..' 'I!il" i!!!I'II/1!llh=/' jl iljljf1ill//
j i Ii If If ~ : If If: I '1 l ~ . j 1111 iilfrlj ,. iiil!J!I~ j.I '1.J':I!r{;, ,
II II i 111/1 ~ " ; .l~ ';'::', '11I'VJ.:I!Ifd:.,:iji~~i!I,fllI1111!iil..,
I' -l-' I I , II I f. I I ~ 0 (]J'. ~ .. ~ "I;.'.'
.. ........ I i'i7ff!\,,;,~~i- * .iP d:; 1\ '0 (
r- ' l)il~z.:.'ll,.io.. N? ~ 8 · I( I 0
. ~ "J!1. ' ~ l~l!.ilUf .g~ II r ~ i" r ~ I !'f
'0 ~ ~6J.;m ~\.~1~ ?~ l~ I;~~!J 11 f{j t,! : ~ I
'-' f,~ "~~ ~~h.. '_V'J.., j ~~f-.. d; ~ .~; ~\ III ~
.s;-. ~'"' 1"0' 'I' I ,,~~, ,oJ' .
. ::: .. ~'_' : I I '/,' ~'J.'l i; it' .~Il !_l~' +- LJJ ~
.:0 ~ ::i ~'. ! / -;::;. "I,~ar,\1 Z I.T " .:.., "1
, ... _ ~.. il . -;r: ~^,;r; '\, ';;;: l1", ~'lJ'''.,\lI'':, , It, , .
! !; i ~:: -.', . .~tt'H~ '. ~ l ""..1..' ,. - - {~~. "~ ~.2"~:.:I~ ',Ii L-IoJQi'-': 1 t,' . j
. 1':S.,!,{Jl " ~ "'- . . ,.... ~;:.:I ~:.L\J ,..,...~ t .
.,..; . ;/.., (>;..:,' ,~t!fI!lLL ,\~(:\\r". t,.,~ 'f
....- JIl) J/'':'~i.\\ ~-<,. \ II II I11I - ,".,.... ...
.%' 'h ~~ ::-...."'i.lJl \) 'Il<l \,\\\ ......,0\ - " ~1::.~~... ...
. ,~" "/'.,,;,;;,,': ,..",..,,~;t\\ '. " o. '", "";".'''' . ~" ~', in..~ I ...
~ ifil'J":' "\, ~,~f&! ~i"'i\~~,r~~,,~t~: 'w Y'~;~r.~'~'\ 1,/'/' "f. ~.".~ ~eJ" 'i?'1: I ~
'.'~ ,.1" 1 ... ""~i ~ -', II' ~~'X ~ ! 1 ~,~. Ii.,"~ ..
)' "~li l ~, . <, : I "('';L ~t{J.J:;_\ r \ ~ ~ I 1.J. /\\\1' 1 m~{,- M, - . '..r~. .r.~~Wi 1..&...
~ ~:, i. ~t/~ I!~ ~~'~~:':~ ! J\;-,:~~-4 I ~ii ~if.nflj. ~\' \ i . ..,., "'~'^ 't.. I"-
, "'~; -'. ,~,,;'f:..' ,,,. "'.~' \~l'~. ~,,, i'/ ...
a ~~~Z,..,~," ....... \\ :., J;'~\ ',.. J'" ,:~ ~J_ ~ ~~. .. \ ".' "
\H :%yf;1"f';:t>' -,. ,,{;~~,;.m ~,~ :~..\~, .vJ,; !",o, "'~"""I..' ~o~..It ~
..}o)' ~ ~! ~~._ ~o ~ ~ ~ ~I ~ 1~~~...L...1oo ~'o" ~ ,~i~"'~ ~ -
.. ~. "A.' ,'Z ';;\;'-"I~\t'<' 1;;~ ~~; ~:, >>~j;;.:.:t.o:"""" ~,-''''~ ..;";./. ..'~ ..',.', '.. '. ~... '
:g If;' ~ 0::;\\\\;'1;' "{ " ~w'" ~';b!.:?'-o" ;-r'~ /L', .. .' T
~ ~ f r;} f;,:~i; '~~~:(~ ;1 I' 0 ,..;@t,~"&~\i Iii; l;; I il! I /"~I ',:". "'...' .
! : ~ .,;.- ~i:. :'\\h~\.~:...~". '~,~;C; t "~.. . ~ "..~,,* r,~, " l
.... ~ 'M ....f%J,,:~ ""\" o,;~. E1" ~ ..~,..~ f'lI';:.il'l~ .I i" " I ':I>
E"'~ :::, :"~ oI:il;:'~(. ,\}I: . :'~4YI~!." J.:jl1^'J..' \ :r
_ \ ~~,.."c n I ,'>\'f;' .......1 "~~~l' . H'" t~'NrJ;f/'~ - - a
..... ' ~"'I"~ 'fI!J:" <: '-, " ~. " f
.t --:' ..."'l..i ~'~ll f.i.. 1m" ~\.l, .;.. ~. :~~.~. <,l' , ~: ~" 'l\ii: ~
"1-. Ji- ~~;I~\'-~ . .(?;Vjj!L' ,I 'Iiir ~ '~\~~'.., t ". Mio; .l.
J. ~ ~ ~ , ~" i.l . .." :J:..; .,. "\ )~~~J ~ ..( .I .. I,.. to 0
"\ ~> '.~,,'1 '.M';" .' y.y JI;r:L!; '\ ! 1:' ~:fv,~.~';*,~" .~tri: .r.r,;: .. ~,.
"""~ ~ "6"~' T~~ , '7Jf.' ~'- I ~ ~'IT" J. , <: 's'>... , ~ t ~ .. ~
".0100; ~ld( . 'R- - I I f- ~~~ ~ "~'~~.,'?I'l '.7,'" ~ il! ~ ~I:
;~. 1(,' l/ :~~. .' ~~' ,.>,. · ~~~\.;; "'- , - .::.
~ J,. 0 0 r:-... .. 0: ;;. f : J' ~ ~;~~ " J;,,;~ ~n, ., ~ II' ' .,
o :"",ri.'.:. . ~ ~ ..' ~,. ~..:' '0 ."". ~. 'l'..; , 'I i,.,f?," ~ '
, lof\ Ft ',), a 'JJ. -I -. I ~-..::.~ ~.: ':'~;.."'1 it..\~"t"1~ :,. 'tI l./,; _:/i" ,", I
.. ~-~tJ ;., ", '~:11: ,., r.,.' .'0 ,0,/"" ........ ';"" 1" -.." ....~ "'.~
.to " . .. I A" _~:-1 ",\ I T_~'."'" ,'t\'....1 5i 'ft'
\ '\.~" 1'V17: : ;r,'{ I '. ,'/~.'W; ....; ~(;'t '!, .' 1:;-,
- ,,~'/ 'J. ~ "I ~ ~ ' " .
..t, ~"( "j. : j.~'t5~ " ~.... .; -, ' Ir\.
- .. i f~ 1 I . '. -;'1 .-. .. . II!=I....
.,~ ~ ~' t)'; ~ ~~ :~~8....' . '; . - ~ i r
~ p ~ ~, :.;:~, i{ VI\~ '.a::::.. ~ ~
l' . ~,'iiilfltllltllllll ~
, . ~ Ill/'I/'.llll., r
ill ' c.\.' 'i- l~1/111/1j II . ..
n l:. " V'lll;'lj" \
o h, ... ~
~. 'J
"' \
c
. I'
.
C' ,
]:
=9
'~
,I
j ! I.d
p~diH
; ! B ,U
e I .., ~
~
"L
I~;., '
,;'
'. .
. ' i
' ..
.....,
,.
oJ' I l:>> , "'l\~..
~ 0.. ~ '
~' ~
'llrt
I
, ~
.
"-
l'
~ '.
';\
~
-
~
~
,..
~ /(,--7
tj ~
Z<;t !D
<1:_ >
Z
~OU ~
<1:Z
~ ~~
UI- >-
ctU I-
(f)g: U
Z~ W
W iE
a..
o
=
I.
~"
~~
,II
4
~
MO
.=
43
g~
!.
Iii
.....
I
"::1-
.....
r..
... I
I ,
e.i
-::..
i~~
101
~I:
I ..
.
'pM
~_.S
.. Oa
~H;
l!f!;!
'rg
-.
~.
'r......._=~_.'".....,,~ ._._
i I
~ I 1
. .
I
.
.
..
- .
I- ..
- ..
"2 I
0
.. :J q
. I
. '-, --
- _a~ ... .,- .
... w !
. \
. ; i
.. \
w
I i
I
'jl !
!I .
~
! Ii
Nl f.
i
I.J
,
Co. 'i I
@ ! ,
11:
N ~ if
..
r.
~ III
~
HI
"" '1..~,,1
, .. ......'
1. .....Q~
. ~,:,::.;" h!'f'/!'ii Ii! mHI::11 ',li!:1, 1iJ!'l "
Illl,111"ll.. '!'I !I'I,/l III III,tl! lllll! .
I 'II "Ill I. '/.i'" 'II'::' ',1' ,
III,II!I.,I! i'l' 1'!I!illll "Illl: 11:!I:
!!HII:!!il! li ! m:1111!1 ~li:!f ~jlU
liill.llllll Jll! Il,!I,III. 11,111. 11,11:
1
D i
t
ii
~
~
....
;,...
bj
.
.
~\...C
BONITA LONG
UNIT
~1
^ I.l;(lt~~
~c~
vJ~ va
I'^b....~
o
o
f olJd.. ve
~
1-
k~~~
m
"
4" . .
. . "- ~"
.
... ... --
, 'V.,.
.
,
:....
y . ..- ~
.- ...
. .
y
W . ..- 'II>
- ...
. .
.'~ ,
Cb
UJ-rv.l
(ine.. '2.4+)
.
.' ,
.
I.
.... --'
:::;:a
I~~,'
-
.
;1
,
I
J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I to
Meeting Date 6-23-92
ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution Approving the Engineer's reports for
the FY 1992-93 spread of assessments for City Open Space
Maintenance Districts 1-10. 14. 15. 17. 18. 20. EastLake
Maintenance District No.1. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre.
declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments and
setting July 21. 1992 at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for
the public hearing.
SUBMITTED BY:
b) Resolution Approving the Engineer's report for the
FY 1992-93 spread of assessments for City Open Space
Maintenance District No. 11. declaring the intention to levy
and collect assessments and setting July 21. 1992 at 6:00 p.m.
as the date and time for t~e/pub.liC hearing.
Director of Public Works~ ~
Director of Parks and Recreatio~
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes__No-x-)
REVIEWED BY:
On April 21. 1992, City Council adopted Resolution Nos. 16588 and 16589
directing the City Engineer to prepare and file reports of assessments for all
existing City Open Space Maintenance Districts. These reports have been
prepared and the above resolution approves them and sets the date for public
hearings to consider the spreading of assessments.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions and direct the City
Clerk to publish the Resolutions of Intention pursuant to Government Code 6061.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Article 4. Chapter 1. Part 2 of Division 15 of the California
Streets and Highways Code. also known as "Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972." the City Engineer has prepared and filed the annual reports for all
existing Open Space Maintenance Districts in the City.
These reports were prepared by the City Engineer or under his direction and
are presented to Counc il for approval in order to proceed wi th the Pub 1 i c
Hearings set for July 21, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972. The reports cover the following districts:
1. Open Space District Nos. I through 11. 14. 15. 17. and 18
2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
3. EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
-
J~"'/{)
/
Page 2, Item I (p
Meeting Date 6-23-92
-
/
The Parks and Recreation Department conducted an informal meeting for all
property owners within each district in April and the Public Works Department
conducted informal meetings on June 13, IS, and 20. At the meetings, staff
explained the proposed budget and annual assessment. A summary of the June
13, IS, and 20 meetings will be provided in the Council Report associated with
the public hearing on July 21, 1992.
The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 1992-93 are as follows:
TABLE 1
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 , Increase
~ Assessment/EDU Assessment/EDU or Decrease
1 S 54.88 S 42.56 -20%
2 35.90 28.92 -20%
3 357.66 331.10(2) -7%
4 213.80 183.64(2) -14%
5 260.74 226.58(2) -13%
6 136.44 128.00(2) -6%
7 98.36 72.12(2) -26%
8 456.02 408.00(2) -10%
9 96.72 93.62(2) -3%
10 131.48 83.46(2) -36%
11 86.18 75.18 -12%
14 369.38 323.20(2) -12%
15 229.20 220.54(2) -3%
17 154.58 146.36(3) -5%
18 285.94 282.48 -1%
20 140.58 246.28 +75%
Eastlake Maint. Dist. 7.52 6.76 -10%
Bay Blvd. llS9. 00 (1) 1031.60 (l ) -13%
Town Centre 41.9S(I) 40.94(1) -2%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
(3) Reserve is at 10%
1- I \
Open Space Districts 1. 9, 11, 14, IS, 17, IS, Bay Blvd, and Town Centre's
assessments are decreasing from last year. This is due to one or both of the
fo 11 owi ng:
1. Budgets were decreased.
2. There were unanticipated savings experienced during May and June of
1991 which were difficult to estimate because of the water
allocation programs. The actual fund balances were higher than the
estimated fund balances used to determine the FY 91/92
assessments. These savi ngs are now refl ected in FY 92/93
assessments.
1(, -1/
Page 3, Item--J ~
Meeting Date 6-23-92
-
Part of the savings from the June 1991 period are being held in reserve in
addition to the 50% operating budget reserve. This is allowed pursuant to
Ordinance 2468 adopted on July 9, 1991, which allows the City, to assess up to
100% of the budget. The reason that a portion of the savings are being used
to increase the reserve are as follows: 1) all ow the accumulation of funds
for special, periodic maintenance items that happen less frequently than
annually; 2) allow more uniform assessments in new districts where both open
space to be maintained and new homes come on over several years which would
otherwise cause the assessments to vary greatly until the entire district is
built out; and 3) to stabilize assessments from year to year due to variations
in actual expenditures and revenue received. It is not staff's intention to
accumulate larger reserves in this later case, but to minimize additional
amounts necessary to smooth out peaks and valleys in the budgeting and
assessment process.
Open Space District No. 10 assessment for FY 92/93 is substantially lower than
FY 91/92 assessment. This is mostly due to assessing the property owners for
the new maintenance associated with the Ladera Villas Subdivision and the
turnover not occurri ng at the time ant ici pated. These savi ngs are refl ected
in the proposed assessment.
Open Space District No. 11 includes a proposed annexation of Lynndale Hills
located northerly of the Terra Nova subdivision. A condition of development
of Lynndale Hills required dedication of open space within their subdivision
and annexation into an open space district to provide for maintenance of the
area. The developer has requested annexation and waived his right to a public
hearing.
The area to be annexed consists of 14 single family dwellings and 5 areas of
natural, unirrigated vegetation. Of this, 1.04 acres will be disturbed by
grading and will require temporary irrigation for re-vegetation.
The proposed FY 92/93 assessment for District 11 does not reflect the
suppl emental costs associated with the annexat i on of Lynnda 1 e Hi 11 s. Staff
does not anticipate turnover of the improvements until FY 93/94.
All property owners of Open Space District No. 11 were notified of the
proposed annexation of land and improvements and will also be notified of the
public hearing. As a result of annexation of Lynndale Hills into the
District, staff anticipates an increase in cost to the district of
approximately $15 per single family dwelling in the first few years. After
that, mai ntenance costs wi 11 decrease as the vegetation becomes establ ished.
Staff anticipates that the long-term increase due to this annexation to be $5
per single family dwelling. It was required that the developer request
annexation into Open Space District 11 as outlined in the conditions of
approval for the tentative map. The other alternative would be to form a
separate district but this would increase overall costs due to administration
of separate contracts, budgets, etc. These costs would then be shared by only
14 single family homes at an estimated cost of $350 per year per home.
I~ '1.2.
Page 4, Item~
Meeting Date 6-23-92
-
r
EastLake Maintenance District No. l's annual assessment is proposed to be
$6.68 per single family dwelling. Supplemental maintenance improvement costs
associated with the turnover of the Otay lakes Road median are partially
offset by the addition of the Greens units. Additional units will be added
from the Greens next year as final maps are recorded. The maintenance of this
median extends from approximately Eastlake Parkway to Rutgers Road.
Open Space District No. 20, Rancho del Rey is the only district with a
proposed increase in assessments. The increase is due to the following:
1. The 91/92 assessments were low due to savings which occurred during
FY 1990-91. These savings were used to lower the FY 1991/92
assessments. The savings were due to turnover of open space
occurring later in the fiscal year than anticipated and from actual
contract costs being lower than originally estimated.
2. Additional costs are being spread to the district because of
turnover of approximately 52 acres of open space in SPA I, Phase 5.
The assessments for this district have been as follows:
FY 90/91
FY 91/92
FY 92/93
The public hearing will
requires that notice be
hearing.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City recovers their costs from the Open Space District
Assessments.
$296.42
$140.58
$246.28
be noticed pursuant to Government Code 6061 which
publ ished at least once 10 days before the publ ic
DDS:05001
WPC 6020E
/""/;1
!2uwcJ j} /(;/;-1
ATTACHMENT "A"
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL MEETINGS
1. One property owner from Open Space District 5 objected to the budget and
the assessment because he bel ieves the negatives, i.e., cost, outweighs
the positives. He also objects that his home overlooks a canyon which is
maintained in a native state and is maintained by a different Open Space
District. He would have like it planted an~ irrigated.
2. One property owner from Open Space District 11 objected to the proposed
annexation of the Lynndale Hills Subdivision because he saw no benefit to
his property.
3. One property owner requested that staff investigate the possibil ity of
detaching certain areas within Bonita Long Canyon from Open Space
District 14. Specifically, one owner was concerned that the highly
manicured perimeter parkways and medians have high maintenance costs and
should not be spread to her phase of the Bonita Long Canyon Subdivision.
A recommendation is presented below.
4. One property owner from Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1 (Ed D'Lugo)
raised several questions regarding the laws pertaining to the 1972
Landscaping and Lighting Act. Staff is arranging for him to meet with
the Assistant City Attorney and the Director of Finance to discuss the
issues.
Bonita LonQ Canvon (Open Space District 141
Open Space District 14's budget is $293,600 for Fiscal Year 1992-93. Of this
amount the parkways and med i ans along East H Street and Corral Canyon Road
constitute approximately $27,700 of that budget. The owner indicated that she
does not use either of the entrances along East H Street or Corral Canyon and
does not want to be charged for this maintenance. In response, staff
recommends the following:
1. That all property owners within Open Space District No. 14 (Bonita Long
Canyon Subdivision) be charged for the costs associated with the
perimeter parkways and medians as has been done historically.
2. That charging the entire subdivision for perimeter parkways and medians
is consistent with other districts with similar circumstances (OSD'S 1-4,
6, 7, 8, 9, 11, 14, 18, 20 and EastLake M.aintenance District).
3. That any change in the di stri ct be deferred unt il such time that staff
presents to Council a Report on a "Scenic Corridor" District.
WPC 6073E
~
/ h ~//
RESOLUTION NO.
lIP 7,),0
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE
AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED
AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO 11
WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the
City Council has caused the formation of various districts under
and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open Space District
Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in
Chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and
Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in Streets and Highways Code
section 22500, et seq., or pursuant to the Act itself designated as
follows:
1.
2 .
3 .
4.
("Open Space
Open Space District Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17 and 18
Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
and Maintenance Districts"); and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the
City Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments
for said Open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's
Report"); and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1992, the City Council approved the
Engineer's Report and set July 21, 1992, as the date for the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992-93 as they compare to last year are shown below:
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 % Increase
OSD Assessment/EDU Assessment/EDU or Decrease
1 $ 54.88 42.56 -20%
2 35.90 28.92 -20%
3 357.66 331.10(2) -7%
4 213.80 183.64(2) -14%
5 260.74 226.58(2) -13%
6 136.44 128.00(2) -6%
7 98.36 72.12(2) -26%
8 456.02 408.00(2) -10%
9 96.72 93.62(2) -3%
10 131.48 83.46(2) -36%
OSDNo11. wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Levy Assessments, 1992-93, on OSD No 11
1 Page 1
I~/I ' J
11
14
15
17
18
86.18
369.38
229.20
154.58
285.94
75.18
323.20(2)
220.54(2)
146.36(3)
282.48
-12%
-12%
-3%
-5%
-1%
20
Eastlake Maint.Dist.
Bay Blvd.
Town Centre
140.58
7.52
1189.00(1)
41.98(1)
246.28
6.76
1031.60(1)
40.94(1)
+75%
-10%
-13%
-2%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
(3) Reserve is at 10%
WHEREAS, all property owners in Open space District Nos.
1-11, 14, 15, 17 and 18 were notified of the informal staff
meetings held on June 13, 15 and 20, as well as noticing District
11 of the proposed annexation of Lynndale Hills subdivision and
future additional costs due to the annexation; Bay Boulevard and
Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting Districts were not noticed of
the proposed assessments because each assessment varies per parcel;
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 and Rancho Del Rey Open Space
District No. 20 were notified of the informal staff meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as to open Space
Districts No. 11, that the City Council of the City of Chula vista
does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment contained in the
Engineer I s Report, and orders the open space and maintenance
facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall
constitute the levy of the assessments as proposed in the
Engineer I s Report for the 1992-1993 fiscal year and set forth
hereinabove for Open Space District No. 11.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Presented by
~
Bruce M. Boog
city Attorney
OSDNo11.wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Levy Assessments, 1992-93, on OSD No 11
2 Page 2
1~/1-~
I' 7<<1
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF THE
LYNNDALE HILLS SUBDIVISION TO OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT NO. 11.
WHEREAS, the Lynndale Hills Subdivision ("Subdivision")
consists of 14 single family dwellings and 5 acres of nautral,
unirrigtated vegetation the boundaries of which are set forth on
Exhibit A; and,
WHEREAS, said Subdivision is adjacent to the territory
incorporated into the City of Chula vista Open space District No.
11, hereto formed as an Open Space District under the authority of
the Chula vista Open Space District Procedural Ordinance
("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in Chapter 17.07 (adopting
in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and Landscaping Act ("Act")
as contained in Streets and Highways Code section 22500, et seq.,
or pursuant to the Act itself; and,
WHEREAS, as condition of the development of
Subdivision, the developer was required to dedicate land as
space and annex the territory of said Subdivision into an
space district in order to provide for the maintenance of said
space; and,
said
open
open
open
WHEREAS, the developer has requested that the City annex
the Subdivision into the territory of Open Space District No. 11;
and,
WHEREAS, all property owners of Open Space District No.
11 were notified of the proposed annexation of land and
improvements and the public hearing approving same;
NOW, THEREFORE, the city Council of the city of Chula
vista does hereby approve the annexation of the territory of the
Lynndale Hills Subdivision to Chula vista Open Space District No.
11 for the purpose of maintaining and financing the open ace.
Presented by
"
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
OSD-LHS.wp
July 16, 1992
Approval of Annexation of Lynndale Hills to No. 11
1 Page 1
/t,/J -/
:/,
File No.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CIlY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE
i(ci,!C1;'}
SUBJECT <Sp^jL-~~ G.J:,o<-~4 0,,,,,,, .'r'-'- \) # \ I dL..L~1 l$v:t-<..,
O......O~>:-~'::c,~
LOCATION
..j". ~~,,'o'j'" ,-,-12.JL ~Q.
I
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION u BY FAX V"'; BY HAND ; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE ~g !q 2- - -
.~
NO. MAILED
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERlY OWNERS
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suire F. San Diego, 92122
1/,)/Q2-
, .
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) v
Planning v'
Originating Department
Engineering L
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) ,/
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
'J I~ ICL\
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
.58.
\0 ~~ /:?
,"-v 02\-, '23
c..vol.A" 2,2
RESOLUTION NO. 16674
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR THE FY 1992-93
SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT II, DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS AND SETTING JULY 21, 1992 AT 6:00 P.M. AS
THE DATE AND TIME FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 4, Chapter I, Part 2 of Division 15 of the
Ca 1 iforni a Streets and Hi ghways Code, also known as "Landscapi ng and Li ghti ng Act
of 1972" and Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17.07, the City Engineer has
prepared and filed the annual reports for all existing Open Space Maintenance
Districts in the City; and,
WHEREAS, these reports were prepared by the City Engineer or under his
direction and are presented to Council for approval in order to proceed with the
public hearing set for July 21, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972. The report covers Open Space District No. 11; and,
WHEREAS, Open Space Di stri ct No. 11 i ncl udes a proposed annexati on of
Lynndale Hills located northerly of the Terra Nova Subdivision, which consists
of 14 single family dwellings and 5 acres of natural, unirrigated vegetation;
and,
WHEREAS, all property owners of Open Space District No. 11 were notified
of the proposed annexation of land and improvements; and,
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department conducted informal meetings on June
13, 15 and 20 at which time staff explained the proposed assessment; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1992-93 is as follows:
OSD
11
FY 91-92
Assessment/EDU
FY 92-93
Assessment/EDU
%Increase
/Decrease
86.18
75.18
-12%
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve the Engineer's report for the FY 1992-93 spread of
assessments for City Open Space Maintenance Districts 11, known as document
number C092-086, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk,
declare its intention to levy and collect assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby set July 21, 1992,
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, California as the date and time for the public hearings on said
assessment.
\L / \W
Resolution No. 16674
Page 2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish
said assessment pursuant to Government Code Section 6061.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
John P. Li ppitt
Director of Public Works
\(y'~ (
Resolution No. 16674
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 23rd day of June, 1992, by the following vote:
YES:
NOES:
ABS ENT :
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers:
Grasser Horton, Moore, Rindone
Councilmembers:
None
Councilmembers:
Malcolm, Nader
Councilmembers:
None
Jerry R. Rindone
Mayor, Pro-Tempore
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) 55.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16674 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 23rd day of June, 1992.
Executed this 23rd day of June, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
1--/0
~ lJ /{ d
ITEM TITLE:
a)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ) 'l
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Public Hearing: City Open Space Maintenance Districts 1-10, 14
15, 17, 18, 20; Eastlake Maintenance District No.1; Bay
Boulevard and Town Centre for Fiscal Year 1992-93
Resolution I~ 7o?~ Ordering Certain open space and
maintenance facilities to be maintained and levying assessment for
Fiscal Year 1992-93 for Open Space District Nos. 1-10, 14, 15,
17, 18, 20; Eastlake Maintenance District No.1; Town Centre I
Landscaping District, and Bay Boulevard Landscaping District
Director of Public Works tV; ~
Director of Parks and Recreation 'r'
'~'ll '
City ManagerJ (\ \'() '~~. (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No Xl
Based upon the advice of the City Attorney, public hearings 16 & 17 have been
separated due to conflict of interest concerns. Council should note that agenda
statement #16 also applies to this public hearing.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council conduct the public hearing and approve the
resolution.
SB/A- 1 13S/OSDIST
/7' I /11"'2..
RESOLUTION NO. J~ 702~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ORDERING CERTAIN OPEN SPACE
AND MAINTENANCE FACILITIES TO BE MAINTAINED
AND LEVYING ASSESSMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
FOR OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NOS. 1-10, 14, 15, 17,
18, 20; EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1;
TOWN CENTRE I LANDSCAPING DISTRICT, AND BAY
BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this resolution, the
city Council has caused the formation of various districts under
and pursuant to either the Chula vista Open space District
Procedural Ordinance ("Procedural Ordinance"), as contained in
chapter 17.07 (adopting in substantial part the 1972 Lighting and
Landscaping Act ("Act") as contained in Streets and Highways Code
section 22500, et seq., or pursuant to the Act itself designated as
follows:
("Open
1.
2.
3.
4.
Space
Open space District Nos. 1-11, 14, 15, 17 and 18
Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
and Maintenance Districts"); and,
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance, the
City Engineer has prepared a report on the spread of assessments
for said open Space and Maintenance Districts ("Engineer's
Report"); and
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1992, the City Council approved the
Engineer'S Report and set July 21, 1992, as the date for the public
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the proposed individual assessments for Fiscal
Year 1992-93 as they compare to last year are shown below:
OSD
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
opdall.wp
July 16, 1992
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 % Increase
Assessment/EDU Assessment/EDU or Decrease
$ 54.88 42.56 -20%
35.90 28.92 -20%
357.66 331.10(2) -7%
213.80 183.64(2) -14%
260.74 226.58(2) -13%
136.44 128.00(2) -6%
98.36 72 . 12 (2) -26%
456.02 408.00(2) -10%
Reso Levy Assessments, 1992-93, on OSD, not 11
1 Page 1
17-3
9 96.72 93.62(2) -3%
10 131. 48 83.46(2) -36%
11 86.18 75.18 -12%
14 369.38 323.20(2) -12%
15 229.20 220.54(2) -3%
17 154.58 146.36 (3) -5%
18 285.94 282.48 -1%
20 140.58 246.28 +75%
Eastlake Maint.Dist. 7.52 6.76 -10%
Bay Blvd. 1189.00(1) 1031.60(1) -13%
Town Centre 41.98 (1) 40.94(1) -2%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
(3) Reserve is at 10%
WHEREAS, all property owners in Open Space District Nos.
1-11, 14, 15, 17 and 18 were notified of the informal staff
meetings held on June 13, 15 and 20, as well as noticing District
11 of the proposed annexation of Lynndale Hills subdivision and
future additional costs due to the annexation; Bay Boulevard and
Town Centre Landscaping and Lighting Districts were not noticed of
the proposed assessments because each assessment varies per parcel;
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1 and Rancho Del Rey Open Space
District No. 20 were notified of the informal staff meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, as to all Open Space and
Maintenance Districts herein referenced, except for Open Space
District No. 11, that the City Council of the City of Chu1a vista
does hereby confirm the diagram and assessment contained in the
Engineer I s Report, and orders the open space and maintenance
facilities to be maintained. The adoption of this resolution shall
constitute the levy of the assessments as proposed in the
Engineer I s Report for the 1992-1993 fiscal year and set forth
hereinabove for all Open Space and Maintenance District except
Open Space District No. 11.
edar
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
opdall.wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Levy Assessments, 1992-93, on OSD, not 11
2 Page 2
J 7- 'I
File No,
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE ., /) \ (~,J.-
SUBJECT nr-" ~~M.-'Lb", I-I~ \'i. \<; II . 1'1, . J..;,
J.~..,..... ~~ i oL..J""....l.o--v--' v,~~ ..1,
LOCATION \
z,;:;tQ...h ,,-!,~J b# I &~O t'J.-( .,.
Q;>>-V-<1 cL.- (~JQ:. LJ '......y:::.-"-o4A ~
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION n BY FAX ~ BY HAND ; BY MAIL
"/ I~J'12-- - -
I I
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK ., I J. f 92-
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) /'
/
Planning v~
Originating Department
Engineering v'
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) v
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
I / '1, (Cid-
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
/
\\/S
RESOLUTION NO. 16673
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR THE FY 1992-
93 SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS 1-10, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO. I, BAY BOULEVARD AND TOWN CENTRE, DECLARING
THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT ASSESSMENTS AND
SETTING JULY 21, 1992 AT 6:00 P.M. AS THE DATE AND TIME
FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 4, Chapter I, Part 2 of Division 15 of the
Cal ifornia Streets and Highways Code, also known as "Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972" and Chula Vista Municipal Code Chapter 17.07, the City Engineer has
prepared and filed the annual reports for all existing Open Space Maintenance
Districts in the City; and,
WHEREAS, these reports were prepared by the City Engineer or under his
direction and are presented to Council for approval in order to proceed with the
public hearing set for July 21, 1992, in accordance with the Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972. The reports cover the following districts:
1. Open Space District Nos. 1 through 10, 14, 15, 17 and 18
2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
3. EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department conducted an informal meeting
for all property owners within each district in April at which time staff
explained the proposed budget; and,
WHEREAS, the Public Works Department conducted informal meetings on June
13, 15 and 20 at which time staff explained the proposed assessments; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 1992-93 are as follows:
FY 91-92 FY 92-93 %Increase
OSD Assessment/EDU Assessment/EDU /Decrease
1 $ 54.88 $ 42.56 -20%
2 35.90 28.92 -20%
3 357.66 331.10 (2) -7%
4 213.80 183.64 (2) -14%
5 260.74 226.58 (2) -13%
6 136.44 128.00 (2) -6%
7 98.36 72.12 -26%
8 456.02 408.00 (2) -10%
9 96.72 93.62 (2) -3%
10 131.48 83.46 -36%
14 369.38 323.20 (2) -12%
15 229.20 220.54 (2) -3%
\ '\ ~~
Resolution No. 16673
Page 2
17
18
20
EastLake Maint. Dist.
Bay Blvd.
Town Centre
154.58
285.94
140.58 (2)
7.52
1189.00 (1)
41.98 (1)
146.36 (3)
282.48
246.28
6.76
1,031.60 (1)
40.94
-5%
-1%
+75%
-10%
-13%
-2%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
(3) Reserve is at 10%
WHEREAS, included in the assessments for Rancho del Rey Open Space District
No. 20, are annualized costs which amount to $80,267, and $160,534 from previous
years which are amortized over 30 or less years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve the Engineer's reports for the FY 1992-93 spread of
assessments for City Open Space Maintenance Districts 1-10, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20,
EastLake Maintenance District No. I, Bay Boulevard and Town Centre, known as
document number C092-085, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk, declare its intention to levy and collect assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby set July 21, 1992,
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, California as the date and time for the public hearings on said
assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to publish
said assessments pursuant to Government Code Section 6061.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
John P. Li ppi tt
Director of Public Works
s~
Resolution No. 16673
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Counci 1 of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 23rd day of June, 1992, by the following vote:
YES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Councilmembers:
Grasser Horton, Moore, Rindone
Councilmembers:
None
Councilmembers:
Malcolm, Nader
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers:
None
Jerry R. Rindone
Mayor, Pro-Tempore
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16673 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 23rd day of June, 1992.
Executed this 23rd day of June, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
l{
\~/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
jg'
Meeting Date 7-21-92
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing to Form Chula Vista Open Space Maintenance
District No. 24, Canyon Views
Resolution
formation
confirming
1992-93
/~ 7,).,3 Ordering the improvements and
of Open Space Maintenance Di strict No.
the diagram and Levying Assessments for Fiscal
the
24,
Year
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution /, '1.:1.1 Adopting the budget for Open
District No. 24
Director of Public Works~ f7
Di rector of Parks and Recreat i onW
City ManagerJ&- ~:~} (4/5ths Vote: Yes..lLNo_)
Space
REVIEWED BY:
On June 30, 1992, the City Council approved the Engineer's Report on the
proposed Open Space Di stri ct No. 24, Canyon Vi ews, and set July 21, 1992 as
the date for a pub 1 i c heari ng on the proposed format i on. The boundari es of
the proposed district are as shown on Attachment "A".
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Hold the public hearing; and
2. Adopt the resolution ordering the improvements, forming Open Space
District No. 24, confirming the diagram and levying assessment for FY
1992-93.
3. Adopt the resolution approving the budget for Open Space District No. 24
in the amount of $27,210 for FY 1992-93 ($680.14 per unit for the fiscal
year).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The proposed assessment for Fiscal Year 1992-93 is $680.26 per unit. Although
it is anticipated that the district will not be accepted for maintenance by
the City unt i 1 January 1993, the Counc i 1 has approved the assessment of the
full fiscal year in order to build up a 50 percent reserve within the first
year and to avoid a large increase in assessment in the next fiscal year.
The hearing has been noticed by the City Clerk in accordance with Section
22556 and 22588 of the Streets and Hi ghways Code. Letters were sent to all
property owners informing them about the proposed assessment and the publ ic
hearing. After conducting the public hearing, the final step in the
proceedings for the formation of the di strict requires that Council adopt a
11"'/
Page 2, Item )~
Meeting Date 7/21/92
resolution which (I) orders the improvements, (2) forms the open space
maintenance district, (3) confirms the district diagram and (4) levy the
assessment either as originally approved in the Engineer's Report or as
modified by Council subsequent to the public hearing.
Ootions
There are four options that could be considered for this District.
1) Create the Open Space District as proposed with the first year assessment
of $680 per unit.
2) Include this District in a "Scenic Corridor" District.
At the Council meeting of July 23, 1991, Council also directed staff to
investigate the feasibility of creating an Open Space District for slopes
and medians along scenic corridors. Staff has done some preliminary
research on this "Scenic Corridor" District for the eastern area and has
identified the following which need to be considered/answered:
a) How are irrigation and electrical systems set up? Are these systems
isolated from local open space systems? How much will it cost to
retrofit these systems to allow inclusion to an overall district?
b) How should the City handle areas in which an homeowners association
maintains the "Scenic" slopes, such as in EastLake?
c) How should the City handle the different levels of landscaping from
one area to another? One area might requi re more i rri gat ion than
another due to the type of plantings.
d) Should the district include only slopes along the Scenic Corridor or
all slopes visible from the roadway, and how far from the road
right-of-way should the Scenic Corridor" District maintain? (i .e.
100', 200', etc)
e) Should areas not included in any present Open Space district be
included and, if the answer is yes, what impact will that have on
the cost.
The complexity of the issues, the lack of staff to process the workload
duri ng the 1 ast fi sca 1 year, the potentials i ze of such a di stri ct, and
ramifications due to shifting cost burdens to thousands of properties in
the eastern area have contributed to staff not having a proposal for
Council's review at this time for a "Scenic Corridor" District. As a
result, staff recommends that Open Space District No. 24 be processed at
this time and if a "Scenic Corridor" District is formed in the future,
that the slopes be included in that district. Staff anticipates
submitting a prel iminary report to the Council by the end of the fiscal
year with the follow-up work and implementation in the next fiscal year.
J y,. ~
Page 3, Item 18"
Meeting Date 7/21/92
3) Do not include the area in a district and have the homeowners maintain
the slopes. The developer did not conduct a survey of all the property
owners to keep the area within the responsibil ity of the homeowners
association. Since he felt the costs were relatively similar, he'd
rather set up the district.
4) Annex to the Bonita Long Canyon Open Space District. This option would
require a hearing with property owners of the annexed area and the Bonita
Long Canyon District. Staff estimates that this action would lower the
assessments for Canyon Vi ew owners from $6BO. 25/year to $338. 92/year.
Bonita Long Canyon property assessments woul d increase from a proposed
$323.20/year to $338. 92/year. However, the current year assessment for
Bonita Long Canyon is $369.38IYear and would be lowered by $30.46/lot.
If this option were selected, staff would recommend that the developer
contribute to the District, by maintaining the slopes for a period of
time sufficient to keep the costs for Canyon Views equivalent to the
costs for Bonita Long Canyon or $323.20/unit. That would probably
require the developer to maintain the slopes for six months. Even though
this option would have a minimal impact on Bonita Long Canyon property
owners, it st ill mi ght generate oppos it i on from the Boni ta Long Canyon
property owners.
A plat is available for Council viewing.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. Cost of district formation are paid for by the
developer through a deposit. Annual staff and administration costs are
included in the assessment. The budget for the district is in fund 574,
activity 5740. The budget is composed of the following items:
TOTAL
$ 7,160
280
160
4,110
14,270
400
800
$27,210
5251 Utilities
5253 Trash Collection & Disposal
5262 Service to Maintain Bldgs., Strcts & Grnds
5291 City Staff Services
5298 Other Contractual Services
5351 Landscape Supplies
5362 Materials to Maintain Bldgs., Strcts. & Grnds
LdeT:kpj
WPC 6067E
Attachments: Exhibit "A" - Open Space District No. 24 Boundaries Ndr .s(ANN~/)
IY'J
iiI
II
I
{
:11
, I
'Ita
III
I I
!.-l'
I
.
I
I
'\
',: .
. .
.
ql
-
-
"
~
~
~.
~
n
z
I:
"'
z
~
~
I
.
I
18"''/
.;:J
RESOLUTION NO._/~ '1 ~3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENTS AND THE
FORMATION OF OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. 24, CANYON VIEWS, AND CONFIRMING THE
DIAGRAM AND ASSESSMENT FOR SAID DISTRICT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the developers of Canyon View Homes Subdivision
(Map 12507) has petitioned for the formation of an open space
district in accordance with the criteria contained in the Chapter
17.07 of the Municipal Code of the City of Chula Vista,
incorporating in substantial part the Lighting and Landscaping Act
of 1972 (commencing at Section 22500 of the Streets and Highways
Code); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Streets and
Highways Code Section 22585, the City Council adopted a resolution
proposing to form the assessment district as to all property with
the boundaries shown on Exhibit A, on , 1992, which
resolution described the improvements required to be financed by
the district and ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report;
and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992, by Resolution No. ,
the city Council approved the Engineer's Report on the proposed
Open Space District No. 24, Canyon Views, and declared its
intention to order the formation of the assessment district at a
pUblic hearing to be conducted on July 21, 1992, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 22587 of said Act; and
WHEREAS, the city Clerk has given notice of said public
hearing by causing the resolution of intention to be published,
posted and mailed as provided in Section 22556; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1992, the City Council conducted a
public hearing and afforded all interested persons the opportunity
to hear and be heard, and considered all oral statements and
written protests or communications made thereat or filed by any
interested person and received any and all protests regarding the
formation of the district and the levy of the proposed assessment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council does
hereby order, determine and resolve as follows:
Section 1. The city Council does hereby determine that
a majority protest does not exist or that if a majority protest
OSD24A.wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Forming Open Space District No. 24
1 Page 1
/?/'/I' /
exists, that such protest is overruled by a four-fifths vote of all
members of this body as provided for in section 22593 of said Act.
Section 2. The City Council does hereby order the
improvements to be made and orders the formation of Open Space
Maintenance District No. 24, confirms the diagram of the District
as prepared by the engineer and as contained in the Engineer's
Report, and does confirm the assessment for said district in the
amount of $680.26 per unit for the full 1992-93 fiscal year, all as
more fully set forth in said Engineer's Report prepared in
accordance with section 22565, et seq. of the Streets and Highways
Code.
Presented by
!1:-1" t
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce Boogaard
City Attorney
OSD24A.wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Forming Open Space District No. 24
2 Page 2
Jg';Cf-r:;).
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR OPEN
SPACE DISTRICT NUMBER 24
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the developers of Canyon View Homes Subdivision
(Map 12507) has petitioned for the formation of an open space
district in accordance with the criteria contained in the Chapter
17.07 of the Municipal Code of the city of Chula vista,
incorporating in substantial part the Lighting and Landscaping Act
of 1972 (commencing at section 22500 of the Streets and Highways
Code); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Streets and
Highways Code section 22585, the city Council adopted a resolution
proposing to form the assessment district as to all property with
the boundaries shown on Exhibit A, on , 1992, which
resolution described the improvements required to be financed by
the district and ordered the preparation of an Engineer's Report;
and
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992, by Resolution No. ,
the city Council approved the Engineer's Report on the proposed
open Space District No. 24, Canyon Views, and declared its
intention to order the formation of the assessment district at a
public hearing to be conducted on July 21, 1992, in accordance with
the provisions of section 22587 of said Act; and
WHEREAS, the city Clerk has given notice of said pUblic
hearing by causing the resolution of intention to be published,
posted and mailed as provided in section 22556; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1992, the City Council conducted a
public hearing and afforded all interested persons the opportunity
to hear and be heard, and considered all oral statements and
written protests or communications made thereat or filed by any
interested person and received any and all protests regarding the
formation of the district and the levy of the proposed assessment;
and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the City Council
overruled any protests and ordered the improvements to be made and
the formation of Open Space Maintenance District No. 24, confirmed
the diagram of the District and the assessment for said district in
1
l~&-I
the amount of $680.26 per unit for the full 1992-93 fiscal year;
and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council does
hereby order, determine and resolve as follows:
section 1. The City council does hereby appropriate from
the proceeds of said assessment the amount of $27,210 to Fund 574,
Activity 5740 and therein, to the following accounts:
5251
5253
5262
5291
5298
5351
5362
utilities
Trash Collection & Disposal
Service to Maintain Bldgs, Strcts & Grnds
City Staff Services
Other Contractual Services
Landscape Supplies
Mat'ls to Maintain Bldgs, Strcts & Grnds
$ 7,160
280
160
4,110
14,270
400
800
TOTAL
$27,210
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
ed ar
rm by
Presented by
Bruce Boogaard
City Attorney
OSD24B.wp
July 16, 1992
Reso Appropriating Proceeds of Levy for OSD No. 24
2 Page 2
l~ 6 ~z..
- .
.
.-
.
.
.t.
\.
/ 8'JJ - j
. I
I
.
II i.
mI'
II,
I I
'.
J
~
,
'~,i
,
1HIS PAGE BLANK
.
.
/8'8-i
~,
File No.
PUBLIC HEARlNG CHECK LIST
l/d dCl.J-
.
SUBJECT "O~~k.-- .k, ~~ ~ ~<-<-J<....
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE
O~-tvJ-#t1\f1 ~'^- V~ \~
LOCATION
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION n BY FAX ~BY HAND
11~(C12- - -
; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
I/dl'i:'-
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) ,/
Planning 0/
Originating Department
Engineering i/
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) 0/
I A !~d--
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
(vb-I
RESOLUTION NO. 16697
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ACCEPTING REPORT AND DECLARING THE CITY'S
INTENTION TO ESTABLISH CHULA VISTA OPEN SPACE DISTRICT
NO. 24 AND SETTING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING
THEREON
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the developer of Canyon View Homes (Map 12507) has petitioned the
City for the formation of an open space maintenance district in accordance with
criteria contained in the Municipal Code; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Streets and Highways Code Section
22587, a publ ic hearing is required to establ ish the proposed open space
district; and,
WHEREAS, an engineer's report was submitted by the City Engineer and the
Director of Parks and Recreation for the cost of maintaining the open space
district; and that said estimated annual assessment to be charged for each parcel
is $680.26; and,
WHEREAS, this report was prepared by the City Engineer or under his
direction and was presented to Council for approval in order to proceed with the
Public Hearing set for July 21 in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting
Act of 1972.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve the Engineer's report for the FY 1992-93 spread of
assessments for Canyon Views Open Space Maintenance District No. 24.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby set July 21, 1992
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, California as the date and time for the public hearings on said
assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby directed to notice the
public hearing in accordance with Sections 22556 and 22588 of the Streets and
Highways Code.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Li ppitt
Director of Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
./
[1,/ff>
Resolution No. 16697
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 30th day of June, 1992, by the following vote:
YES: Councilmembers: Grasser Horton, Malcolm, Moore,
Rindone, Nader
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 16697 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council held on the 30th day of June, 1992.
Executed this 30th day of June, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
(V fy0
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item J.!t-
Meeting Date 07/21/92
ORDINANCE ~~ i Amending Section 2.30.020 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code Relating to Membership on the Economic
Development Commission
SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director C.s.
REVIEWED BY: City Manager",)c,\)'Y~~\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X)
BACKGROUND: Ordinance 2380 creating the City's Economic Development Commission was
approved by Council on July 17, 1990 (Attachment 1). On October 9, 1990, Council approved
Ordinance 2402, amending sections 2.30.020 and 2.30.060 of Ordinance 2380 to expand EDC
membership from seven (7) to nine (9) commissioners (Attachment 2). The Economic
Development Commission is proposing an amendment to the approved Ordinance to include
language outlining specific areas of expertise which should be drawn from in Council's selection
of appointees. The purpose is to encourage a well balanced membership representing expertise
vital to the EDC's role in developing, recommending and implementing economic development
strategies.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council introduce the attached Ordinance for first reading.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City's Economic Development
Commission approved the proposed ordinance on July 1, 1992 by a vote of 5-2-1 (Minutes,
Attachment 3). (Note: Commissioner Read's seat on the EDC expired June 30, 1992,
consequently that seat was vacant at the taking of the vote.)
DISCUSSION:
Under the current ordinance, two EDC members are appointed from nominees from the
Chamber of Commerce; one member is appointed from a nominee from the South San Diego
Bay Cities Board of Realtors; and six members are Chula Vista residents at large. These nine
members have voting privileges. In addition, up to three non-voting members may be appointed.
These three commissioners do not need to be local residents.
The proposed ordinance makes two changes: 1) it identifies specific areas of expertise which
should be represented on the EDC to the extent possible, and 2) it expands non-voting, non-
resident membership from three to five.
The goals of these modifications are twofold. The first goal is to optimize the EDC's depth of
expertise and resourcefulness as relates to advising Council on matters of business and job
development. The suggested areas of expertise (see item 4 of the proposed ordinance) reflect
areas essential to developing economic development strategies relating to business assistance,
both in terms of retention and attraction. The recommended areas of expertise would contribute
knowledge and resources relating to such issues as labor pool skills and trends, land cost and
)9-/
ATTACHMENT 1
(
ORDINANCE NO. 2380
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY REPEALING CHAPTER 2.30 OF
THE MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 2.30
ESTABLISHING THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Chapter 2.30 of the Chula Vista Municipal is hereby
repealed.
SECTION II: That a new Chapter 2.30 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is
hereby added to read as follows:
Chapter 2.30
Sec. 2.30.010
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Purpose and Intent.
(
It is the purpose and intent of the City Council, in establishing the
Economic Development Commission, to create an advisory and coordinating
body which is to serve as a resource, to advise and to make
recommendations to the City Council and City Manager on economic
development issues and opportunities that would benefit the community.
Sec. 2.30.020
Membership.
The Commission shall consist of seven (7) voting members appointed by
the City Council from the qualified electors of the City, two of whom
shall be appointed from a classification consisting of nominees from the
Board of Directors of the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce and who shall,
at the time of their appointment and throughout their term, have
membershi pin the Chamber of Commerce; one (1) of whom shan be a nomi nee
from the Board of Di rectors of the South San Diego Bay Ci ti es Board of
Realtors and who shall, at the time of their appointment and thoughout
their term have membership in the South San Diego Bay Cities Board of
Realtors; and four (4) of whom shall be residents at large and who shall,
throughout their term, maintain their residency and elector status.
The City Manager or his/her designated representative shall be an
ex-officio member of the Commission, but shall have no vote. ("Staff
Ex-officio Member").
The City Council, or its designee, may appoint not greater than three
(3) additional ex-officio members of the Commission, but any such
appoi nted ex-offi ci 0 members shall have no vote ("General Ex-offi ci 0
11ember" ) .
I
'-
J9-J
Ordinance No. 2380
Page 2
Sec. 2.30.030
Initial Goals.
(
The initial goals of the Commission shall be as follows:
A. To assess the job needs of the residents of Chula Vista, and after
doing so, to engage in a variety of activities that will help
create, retain and attract jobs and capital investment that will
meet the employment needs of the community.
B. To help ensure that there are adequate educational programs
available to support the instructional needs of the jObs being
created.
C. To immediately establish a specific plan of action to help
implement the objectives of the City Council.
D. To help assure prospective industrial and commercial . developers and
existing commercial and industrial interests of the cooperation of
the City to benefit both business and the community.
E. To catalog current and planned industrial and commercial sites, and
furthermore,. to identify other potential industrial and commercial
areas that woul d complement and not interfere with exi sti ng and
planned residential developments.
F.
To work with the planning department to coordinate land use
designations appropriate to current and future market demand.
(
G. To work with realtors/developers to market Chula Vista as a viable
alternative to other Southern California markets.
H. To work with planners and developers to encourage retail and resort
land uses (e.g. restaurants, retail promenades and other commercial
recreation facilities) with .specific design criteria that will
encourage development most beneficial to the City's long term
interests.
Sec. 2.30.040
Initial Plan of Action.
The initial plan of action of the Commission shall be as follows:
A. In conjunction with the City staff, to help develop and maintain a
system to ensure the prompt and expediti ous revi ew of i ndustri a 1
and commercial development applications.
B. To communicate and coordinate with the South County Economic
Development Council in achieving the objectives of the Commission.
C.
To enlist cooperation of all utilities and major financial
institutions to provide the facilities to support an industrial and
commercial development program.
E::'
D. To notify and establish lines of communication with national and
regional EDC's, industrial and commercial real estate brokers and
developers concerning the plans and objectives of the Commission.
19",/
Ordinance No. 2380
Page 3
r
E.
To help develop informational materials concerning the economic and
commercial possibilities of Chula Vista to be transmitted to
representatives of interested companies.
F. To work with the Community Development Department to redevelop
areas of Chula Vista.
G. To work with City staff to revise a brochure for national
distribution presenting summary information on Chula Vista's
industrial, commercial and labor markets.
H. To encourage the development of transportation modes to support
industrial and commercial development.
Sec. 2.30.050
Meetings; Organization.
The meetings and organization of the Commission shall be as follows:
A. The Chula Vista Economic Development Commission shall hold its
meetings at such time and place as it determines by resolution.
All meetings shall be subject to the provisions of the Ralph M.
Brown Act (Section 54950 et seq., Cal ifornia Government Code).
Four of the seven voting members shall constitute a quorum for the
transaction of business.
(
B.
The members of the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission
shall adopt reasonable rules for the conduct of its proceedings.
C. The members of the Chula Vista Economic Development Commission
shall, at the July meeting, elect one of its members to serve as
Chairman, and one of its members to serve as Vice Chairman who
shall preside in the absence of the Chairman.
D. Members of the Chul a Vi sta Economi c Development Cornmi ssi on, the
Chairman and any persons voluntarily assisting the Commission in
conducti ng its duti es shall sEirve at no salary, but shall be
reimbursed for expenses incurred in the performance of their duties
while serving the City of Chula Vista in accordance with policies
adopted by the City and to the extent that appropriations for such
expenses have been provided by the City Council in approving the
Commission's budget.
E. Subject to the approval of the City Council, the City may accept,
in trust for the Commission, of gifts and grants from any source to
assist the Commission in the performance of its functions.
F.
The Commi ssi on may appoi nt, at its di screti on, such subcommittees
as it deems appropriate to review specific economic development
issues. These subcommittees may be composed of citizens and
ex-officio members. The chairman of each such subcommittee must be
a member of the Commission.
)
....
J'~f
Ordinance No. 2380
Page 4
Sec. 2.30.060
Term of Office.
(
A. The voting members of the Commission shall serve for a term of four
years, except that the initial appointment of one member shall be
for a term of one year, two members shall be for a term of two
years, two members shall be for a term of three years, and two
members shall be for a term of four years. Such initial
appointments shall be determined by lot among the initial
appoi ntees of the Commi ssi on. All vacanci es shall be fi 11 ed for
the unexpired term of the member whose place has become vacant.
B. The term of General Ex-officio members shall be for a period of two
years from the time of appointment. A General Ex-officio member
may be reappointed without limitation. The term of the Staff
Ex-officio member shall be indefinite and said Staff Ex-officio
member shall serve at the pleasure of the City Manager.
C. Notwithstanding the above, the term of office of any voting member
shall continue until such time as a new appointment to that
position has been made by the City Council.
SECTION II I: Thi s ordi nance shall take effect and be in full force on
the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Presented by
J
(
J"~~ ~ (!,)'
liregoryu .ULOX
r1ayor
e
19'(,
ATTACHMENT 2
(
ORDINANCE NO. 2402
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AMENDING SECTIONS 2.30.020 AND 2.30.060 OF THE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
EXPANDING MEMBERSHIP IN THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FROM SEVEN TO NINE
MEMBERS.
The City Council of the City of, Chula vista does ordain as
follows:
Section 1. That Sections 2.30.020 and 2.30.060 of the Chula
vista Municipal Code are amended to read as follows:
Section 2.30.020 Membership.
A. Number of Members.
The Commission shall consist of nine (9) Voting Members,
a Staff Ex-officio Member and up to three (3) General Ex-
officio Members.
B. Designation of Members.
(
1. Voting Members.
The Voting Members shall be appointed by the City Council
from the qualified electors of the City, two (2) of whom shall
be appointed from a classification consisting of nominees from
the Board of Directors of the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce
and who shall, at the time of their appointment and throughout
their term, have membership in the Chamber of Commerce; one
(1) of whom shall be a nominee from the Board of Directors of
the South San Diego Bay cities Board of Realtors and who
shall, at the time of their appointment and throughout their
term, have membership in the South San Diego Bay cities Board
of Realtors; and six (6) of whom shall be residents of the
City at large and who shall, throughout their term, maintain
their residency and elector status.
2. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The City .Manager or his/her designate representative
shall be an ex-officio member of the commission, who shall not
be required to be a qualified elector of the city, but who
shall have no vote ("Staff Ex-officio Member").
3. General Ex-Officio Members.
~
The City Council, or its designee, may appoint not
greater than three (3) additional ex-officio members of the
Commission, who shall not be required to be qualified
19-7
Ordinance No. 2402
Page 2
(
elector (s) of the city, but any such appointed ex-officio
members shall have no vote ("General EX-Officio Member").
Section 2.30.060 Term of Office.
A. Term of Office--AII Classes of Members.
1. Post-Initial Terms.
Except as otherwise provided in this Subsection A, the
term of office of all members, and all classes of members, of
said Commission shall be for a nominal period of four (4)
years, and shall terminate on June 30th of the fourth year of
their term, unless they shall otherwise sooner resign, die,
become disqualified or incompetent to hold Office.
2. Initial Terms of Voting Members.
Notwithstanding subsection A.1., the Initial Terms shall
commence upon appointment and shall conclude, for two (2)
Voting Members on June 30, 1991; for two (2) Voting Members on
June 30, 1992; for two (2) Voting Member members on June 30,
1993; and for three (3) Voting Members on June 30, 1994,
unless they shall otherwise sooner resign, die, become
disqualified or incompetent to hold Office.
(
a. Appointment to Initial Terms by Lot.
Appointment of the initial Voting Members as to the
Initial Terms shall be determined by lot, the fairness of
which method shall be approved by the Mayor in advance if
agreement as to method can not be reached among the Voting
Members.
3. General Ex-officio Member.
The term of General Ex-officio members shall be.for a
period of four years from the time of appointment.
4. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The term of the Staff Ex-officio Member shall be
indefinite.
5. Holdover Office.
Notwithstanding the end of any Member's Initial Term or
Post-initial Term as herein provided, a Member, other than the
Staff Ex-officio Member, shall be permitted to continue to
b
19- 8"
(
Ordinance No. 2402
Page 3
exercise the privileges of his former Office for a period of
6 months after the end of his term until the Office to which
he was assigned is filled by his re-appointment or by the
appointment of a qualified successor to his Office.
6. Vacancies.
,
Notwithstanding the term of Office to which a Member is
assigned, said Office shall be deemed vacant upon any of the
following events ("Event of Vacancy"):
,
a. The death or disability of said Member that
renders said Member incapable of performing the duties of his
Office.
b. The termination of his status as Member of the
Commission or the classification he was assigned to represent
on the Commission.
c. The member's conviction of a felony or crime
involving moral turpitude.
(
d. The member's absence from three (3) regular,
consecutive meetings of the Commission, unless excused by
majority vote of such board or commission expressed in its
official minutes.
e. The member's has submitted his resignation which
resignation has been accepted by the city Council.
f. The membership has been terminated by three
affirmative votes of the City Council.
Upon the occurrence of an Event of Vacancy as hereinabove
listed, the City Council shall so declare the Office to be
vacant, and shall expeditiously take such steps as are
necessary to fill said vacancy.
B. Number of Terms.
1. Voting Members.
a. Two Term Limit. No Voting Member shall be
appointed to more than two (2) terms except as herein provided
("Two Term Limit").
,
b. Unexpired Term Exception. Notwithstanding the
Two Term Limit, a person appointed to the Committee as a
Voting Member to fill the unexpired term of an Office of a
"-
19'"'{
Ordinance No. 2402
Page 4
(
Voting Member which has become vacant ("Unexpired Term") which
has less than two (2) years remaining on said Unexpired Term,
may be appointed to two (2) terms in addition to their
Unexpired Term. A Voting Member who currently occupies an
Office may not be re-appointed to fill the Unexpired Term of
another Office which has become vacant.
c. Initial Term Exception. Notwithstanding the Two
Term Limit, a person appointed to an Initial Term of two (2)
or less years may be appointed at the natural expiration of
their Initial Term to two (2) terms in addition to their
Initial Term. A Voting Member who occupies an Office under an
Initial Term may not be appointed to fill the Unexpired Term
of another Office which has become vacant.
d. Any Voting Member may be re-appointed to serve
on the Committee after two (2) successive years of not serving
on the Committee in any Office or Membership capacity--Voting
or Staff Ex-officio.
2. General Ex-officio Members.
A General Ex-officio member may be reappointed without
limitation as to number of terms.
(
3. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The Staff Ex-officio member shall serve at the pleasure
of the City Council.
Section 2: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
o form by:
b
J9-/P
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ATTACHMENT 3
Exerpt from Economic Development Commission
Minutes of July I, 1992
a. Discussion of EDC Ordinance Regarding Membership (continued item) - William Tuchscher
Member Tuchscher said his intent in presenting this revision to Council was to better guide the types of categories
from which future members will be selected. He asked that the Commission approve this request.
Member Davis clarified wording on the Board of Directors for South San Diego Bay Cities Board of Realtors. She
said not all officers are members of the City of Chula Vista and would like to make note of that. Member
Tuchscher responded that this would not circumvent the language.
Member Gerber stated that this Commission was formed to include the public and private sectors What the
Commission lacks in expertise may be made up in straight-forwardness. If you start gelling major landholders and
developers on this Commission, you will lose concern for the citizens. The Commission is here to serve the citizens
as best it can.
Member Tuchscher responded that what he is presenting is a guideline from which expertise is drawn. The rationale
is to modify what is now ambiguous as to the types of people that are nominated for the Commission. Currently,
the Mayor selects an individual and presents the name to Council for ratification. He has authority to nominate
anyone from any sector; this is a guideline for Council to follow to provide a well-rounded background for the
Commission. Part of this recommendation includes the expansion of ex-officio membership from three to five.
Ex-officios do not have to be City residents; therefore, the Commission could have corporate representatives, such
as from Rohe or Kaiser, to contribute their ideas.
Member Lopez slated that he was concerned that the EDC is already top heavy with real estate representatives.
The proposal seems to stress more of the same. The Commission' s focus needs to be changed from real estate
speculation to more manufacturing and wealth creating services. He is not comfortable with the revision. as
presented.
Member Tuchscher responded that this guideline is not saying that a certain number of representatives from each
group are to be represented but rather that these are groups from which appointees can be drawn. The existing
language regarding nominees from the Board of Realtors would not change. This is a way for the Commission to
shape the destiny of this group.
MS (TuchscherlDavis) that Council modify the ordinance to include the list of recommended expertise within
the ordinance.
Member Lopez concurred with Member Gerber's statement that the Commission needs more members from the
public-at-large to make this more of a community effort. As to the question of expertise, the Commission has all
the expertise they need from every field with the creation of all the sub-commillees. If the Committee knows what
it wants first, then they can go out and get that expertise without having to change the ordinance. He objects to the
categories of major landowners and real estate.
Member Compton stated that his interest is solely for the community. This should be the goal of any person that
sits on this Commission. This Commission cannot work well if there is a feeling among members that people are
there to represent their own interests.
VOTE ON MOTION
AYES: Compton, Davis, Tuchscher, Allen, Maslak
NOES: Lopez, Gerber
ABSENT: LoBue
The motion passed 5-2-1.
Member Allen emphasized that the focus had not been on real estate development. Strealining the permit process
was focused on because people trying to do business in Chula Vista were not able to go forward in a timely fashion.
19--1/
10/31/91
Boards and Commissions Roster
Economic Development Commission
Allen, Pemy
666 Mariposa Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Home Phone: 421-0868
Bus. Phone: 696-0575
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Date Expire: 06130/94 Re-Appt. Date:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resl;. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.:
Economic Development Commission
Compton, Marshall Vice Chair
1339 Preston PLace
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Home Phone: 422-2431
Bus. Phone: 425-6040
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Date Expire: 06/30/91 Re-Appt. Date: 06/04/91
Sec. Term No.: 2 Date Re-Appt. Ex.: 06/30/95
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.: Represents Board of ReaLtors
Economic Development Commission
Davis, Patty
653 Redlands PLace
Bonita, CA 91902
Home Phone: 421-6942
Bus. Phone: 475-0233
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Date Expire: 06/30/94 Re-Appt. Date:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.:
Economic Development Commission
Gerber, ALbert F.
694 Myra Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Home Phone: 422-7210
Bus. Phone: 221-6646
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Date Expire: 06/30/92 Re-Appt. Date:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.:
Economic Development Commission
LoBue. Jim
621 Woodlawn Ave.
Chule Vista, CA 91910
Home Phone: 425-0702
Bus. Phone: 236-6012
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1.
Date Expire: 06/30/93 Re-Appt. Date:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.:
ATTACHMENT 4
Pege 29
/9-/..2..
10/31/91
Boards and Commissions Roster
Economic Development Comnission
Maslak., Mike
1907 Bordeaux Terrace
Chula Vista, CA 91013
Home Phone: 421-9069
Bus. Phone: 482.8n8
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Oate Expire: 06/30/94 Re-Appt. Oate:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.: Represents Chamber/on Auto Park TF
Economic Development Commission
Read, Don . Chair
576 Ha~hire lane
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Home Phone: 482-2066
Bus. Phone: 420-6602
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90 First Term No.: 1
Date Expire: 06/30/92 Re-Appt. Date:
Sec. Term No.: Date Re-Appt. Ex.:
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.: Represents Chamber on Commission
Economic DeveLopnent Commission
Tuchscher, William C.
8880 Rio San Diego Dr.-#200
San Diego, CA 92108
Home Phone: HI A
Bus. Phone: 260-2814
Type: M
Date Appt.: 10/09/90
Date Expire: 06/30/91
Sec. Term No.: 2
Resig. Date:
Spouse Name: Misc.:
First Term No.: 1
Re-Appt. Date: 06/04/91
Date Re-Appt. Ex.: 06/30/95
ATTACHMENT 4
Page 30
J9""/J
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date ~V';J
availability, demographic data, housing costs and availability, financial assistance, utility
capacity, regulations and rates, vocational and on-the-job training programs, regional economic
development programs and resources, maquiladora resources, and general input from local
employers, large and small.
The second goal is to allow Council more latitude in appointing highly qualified and skilled
individuals who are dedicated to the economic betterment of Chula Vista but who may not
necessarily reside within the City's corporate boundaries. This goal supports the first goal by
enabling Council to select appointees from the recommended areas of expertise without
restricting them to local residents. For example, key local employer executives, utility
executives, business park developer/owners, employment service providers, or Small Business
Development Center professionals may not live within City limits. The recommended change
would not preclude such individuals from serving the City on the EDC.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Ordinance 2380
Ordinance 2402
Minutes, Economic Development Commission, July 1, 1992
Economic Development Commission Membership and Terms
tJe< ~~t~
I~;e.~
[C,WP51\COUNCILI113SIEDC-ORD.113]
/7'.2 /14-14/
ORDINANCE
~ 5:;. r
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION
2.30.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
MEMBERSHIP ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
as follows:
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby ordain
Section 1. That Section 2.30.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to read
as follows:
Section 2.30.020 Membership.
A. Number of Members.
The Commission shall consist of nine (9) Voting Members, a Staff Ex-
officio Member, and up to tilree (3)RII~1 General Ex-officio Members.
B. Designation of Members
1. Voting Members.
The Voting Members shall be appointed by the City Council from the
qualified electors of the City, two (2) of whom shall be appointed from a
classification consisting of nominees from the Board of Directors of the Chula
Vista Chamber of Commerce and who shall, at the time of their appointment and
throughout their term, have membership in the Chamber of Commerce; one (1) of
whom shall be a nominee from the Board of Directors of the South San Diego Bay
Cities Board of Realtors and who shall, at the time of their appointment and
throughout their term, have membership in the South San Diego Bay Cities Board
of Realtors; and six (6) of whom shall be residents of the City at large and who
shall, throughout their term, maintain their residency and elector status.
2. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The City Manager or his/her designate representative shall be an ex-officio
member of the commission, who shall not be required to be a qualified elector of
the City, but who shall have no vote ("Staff Ex-officio Member").
3. General Ex-officio Members.
The City Council, or its designee, may appoint not greater than three (3)
additional ex-officio members of the Commission, who shall not be required to be
qualified elector(s) of the City, but any such appointed ex-officio members shall
have no vote ("General Ex-officio Member").
/9-1.5"
qualified elector(s) of the City, but any such appointed ex-officio members shall
have no vote ("General Ex-officio Member").
!hil~~~!i!_~ti~!?~~tH~
~.~9~irjfg:~i!j~~II~~~g~~l191\~~~~mt~q~i1qlinl1~~~~~!My~tl\~Y
~
".........!......!...!.....................MRc..........eolt~l.:'al.tl.....~,itu.. t.I.;'"~,....iI1'.:,;v.......e...lW;.......g.r..
-..................."'!",."......#\1'!...~~_~.".."'p"..
"I..Rijl!.lld~t.........................................................................................
~1.111(11~~
..IIt9~w.i1nlq~fll!U.lI!1m~il~~.91
:!II'lilllt;1lil$f
'lI~j~~iii~t~
:IIIII"'IIII~~MMl!~~~
:1~1~lfllllli'ril'I~II\II;L~~Rmml~~~q#
"III!li!imm~~);{i'iU~w,N'.:atq)AA\t
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from
and after its adoption.
Presented by:
s
c~~ c;:O~ /
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
[C:IWP51ICOUNCILIRESOSIEDC-ORD.ORD]
/9'" /~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~t:J
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 7/21/92
Resolution 1~7~";-:pprOVing additional contributions to
assessments in conjunction with Assessment Di stri ct No. 90-2
(Otay Valley Road)
Director of Public Works rfII l.s.
Director of Community Development v~
City Manager-J~ \wx~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
U Council Referral No. 2627
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On June 23, 1992, Council confi rmed the assessments for Assessment Di stri ct
No. 90-2, Otay Valley Road. At that meeting, Council directed staff to
reconsider certa i n property owner requests for addi t i ona 1 credit for slopes
and constructed improvements.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Approve an additional contribution of $20,973 to Ms. Gregory's assessment
for improvements constructed.
2. Deny Mr. Teyssier's, Mr. Barber's and Mr. Brady's requests for additional
contributions to their assessments.
3. Approve an additional contribution of $5,663 to Mr. Cushman's assessment
for slopes.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Certain property owners within the assessment district have indicated to staff
that the credits previously allocated to their property should be increased
for vari ous reasons. Presented below is a summary of the property owner
requests. Included are the results, conclusions or an alternative for each
situation.
1. J. 1. Racinq (Rita Greqorvl - AN 11
J. T. Racing had requested at the hearing and in letters to the City that
they receive an adjustment to their assessment based on costs incurred
and not on unit pri ces taken from the low bi dder for Phase I of thi s
project. The difference is approximately $27,000. J. T. Racing has
substant i ated thei r costs with cancelled checks, recei pts, and i nvoi ces
(Attachment G).
J. T. Racing has also indicated that staff previously informed them that
if these improvements were installed that they would not be required to
participate in the assessment district. J. T. Racing initially received
~~-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
,).1)
7/21/92
a deferral for the improvements and subsequently were required for safety
reasons to construct them when the improvements to the east and west were
completed.
Staff recommends that Council give J. T. Racing another adjustment to
their assessment in the amount of $20,973* based on:
1. J. 1. Racing believes staff informed them that they would not need
to part i ci pate further in the assessment di stri ct if they
constructed their frontage improvements. Actions of the City
required J. 1. Racing to construct the improvements ahead of the
assessment district.
2. J. 1. Racing paid their fair share if only costs are considered
although they did not participate fully in their fair share of
improvements.
3. Council directed staff on May 26, 1992 to consider additional
adjustments to assessments based on verifiable, actual costs paid by
property owners.
* This equals the confirmed assessment amount as of June 25, 1992 if paid within the 30 day
cash collection period. J. T. Racing wiLL not receive a contribution greater than their
assessment.
2. Atomic (Leonard Tevssierl - AN 5
Leonard Teyss i er of Atomi c Investments had requested addit i ona 1
adjustment to his assessment based on CPI adjustments for existing
improvements and for right-of-way dedicated in conjunction with his
development. Staff met with him and his attorney, Charles Deem, to
di scuss thei r request. Staff exp 1 a i ned that no other property owners
were receiving adjustments for prior right-of-way dedications and that
the City did not concur with their analysis which was based on CPI
adjustments. At the conclusion of the meeting on July 10, 1992, it was
understood that staff would not recommend further adjustments to their
assessment (Attachments D, D.l and D.2).
3. Mr. Cushman - AN 6
Mr. Cushman has requested an adjustment to his confirmed assessment for
additional slope area of 1.15 acres (2.4 acres were previously approved),
for construction of Shinohara Lane cul-de-sac, and for participating in
one-half the cost of Shinohara Lane in the form of alien agreement
(Attachment F).
Staff met with Mr. Cushman and his engineer on July 10, 1992 and
discussed Mr. Cushman's proposal. Staff agreed to review the acreage
adjustment for slopes and the Sensitive Impact Area. Upon review, staff
recommends that Mr. Cushman receive an additional adjustment of $5,663
.2P-rI<
Page 3, Item ).()
Meeting Date 7/21/92
(0.26 acres) for proposed slopes and cribwalls shown on the approved site
pl an whi ch are necessary to develop the site. Thi s also provides a net
site coverage of approximately 37%. Staff recommends that no other slope
credit be given because the credit as recommended is consistent with the
analysis of the other properties within the district.
Staff does not recommend that the City provide adjustment to Mr.
Cushman's assessment for improvements constructed for Shinohara Lane or
the cul-de-sac at the end. This is consistent with the other properties
within the district. Mr. Cushman requested special consideration because
he felt hi s access to Otay Vall ey Road was reduced due to mappi ng and
deed discrepancies and hence his improvements were made to Shinohara Lane
instead of Otay Valley Road. However, the access he had was narrow and
unimproved and would not have been adequate to serve his property unless
improved. Addi t i ona lly, hi s access to Timber Street through the
residential area would not be acceptable for an industrial parcel either
nor was it physically (due to topography) a viable connection.
Staff indicated to Mr. Cushman that these road access issues, if
addressed, should be done outside of the assessment district proceedings
because the requirements resulted from rezoning of the land and
conditions of development, and not assessment district issues.
We are recommending that a credit be given against his assessment of
$5,663.
4. Don Palumbo - AN 24
Don Palumbo of Goldcoast requested credit for utility undergrounding work
which is currently under construction. Staff met with him on July 10,
1992 and agreed that the City would contact SDG&E to request that the
City's allocation of "20A" funds be used to reimburse him for the
eligible work. A portion of the work performed on behalf of Goldcoast is
within the contract for undergrounding awarded to Granite Construction
Company. A change order to delete this work from Granite Construction
Company's contract will be processed later.
At this time, staff does not know if SDG&E will allow the use of "20A"
funds for the work done in conjunction with the Goldcoast project. Staff
is working with SDG&E on this and anticipates having a response from
SDG&E within the next month.
5. Walter Barber - AN 49
Walter Barber, in his letter to the City dated July 2, 1992, requested an
explanation of how the adjustments to his assessment for slopes were
determined. Staff responded in a letter to him that the areas consisting
of slopes or rip rap for drainage structures located outside of setbacks
were used to adjust his assessment downward (Attachments B and C).
.2tl ~ 3
~
j
~
"
~
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
02tJ
7/21/92
6. B & B Partners (Mr. Bradv) - AN 12
Mr. Brady of B & B Partners in his letter dated July 8, 1992, protested
the district and his assessment. He installed improvements along his
frontage of Otay Valley Road and questions how the adjustment to his
assessment for those improvements was determi ned. The cost i nformat ion
he provided to City staff for the improvements was based on "bond" unit
prices. The adjustments to assessments for existing improvements as
approved by Council was based on low bid unit prices (Attachments H, H.1,
and H.2). Mr. Brady could not provide actual unit prices because the
work was performed under a "1 ump sum" contract in conjunct i on with
development of his site.
Staff will prepare a written response to Mr. Brady.
CONTRIBUTIONS
Contributions will be made
assessments. No modifications
Report need to be made.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are avai 1 abl e from 996-9960-ST123 for the recommended
additional contribution of $5,663 to Mr. Cushman's assessment (Assessment No.
6) and $20,973 to J. T. Racing's assessment (Assessment No. 11). The revised
"City" contribution for the project would be $5,271,415.00.
to assessments by "buyi ng down" the
to the confirmed assessments or En9ineer's
DDS:AY-081
WPC 6069E
Attachment Schedule
A - Council Referral 2627
B - Letter from Walter Barber dated 7-2-92
C - City's Letter to Walter Barber
D - Letter from Charles Deem dated 6-24-92
D.1 - Letter from Atomic dated 6-15-92
D.2 - letter from Atomic dated 6-4-92
E - Sheet 1 of Assessment Diagram
F Mr. Cushman's Letter and Attachments dated 7-8-92
G J. T. Racing's Documentation of Costs
H Mr. Brady's Letter dated 7-5-92
H.1 - Mr. Brady's Estimate dated 5-27-92
H.2 - Credit Summary for Existing Improvements
~"-'/
20. RESOLUTION
/1/7';'.5
APPROVING ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO
ASSESSMENTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NUMBER 90-2 (OTAY VALLEY ROAD)
THE RESOLUTION WAS NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME THE COUNCIL AGENDA
PACKETS WERE PREPARED AND WILL BE PRESENTED AT THE MEETING ON
JULY 21, 1992.
,...
rJ() --.5
~
RESOLUTION NO.
t" 7;;'5::,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE PAY-
MENT OR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF CERTAIN ASSESS-
MENTS IMPOSED IN CONNECTION WITH THE OTAY
VALLEY ROAD WIDENING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, on June 23, 1992, by Resolution No. 16643, the City
Council formed the Otay Valley Road Assessment District,
Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road) ("Assessment
District") and confirmed assessments as proposed in a report
prepared by Willdan Associates, assessment engineers, dated June
23, 1992, and approved by the City Engineer ("Engineer's
Report"); and,
WHEREAS, in connection with the formation of the Assessment
District, the city impressed various parcels of land with
assessments as described in the Engineer'S Report including but
not limited to one parcel known as Assessor Parcel No. 644-040-01
owned by one Helen Cushman and referred to in said Engineer's
Report as Assessment No.6, in the amount of $141,234.00 with a
payoff amount of $134,996.00; and,
WHEREAS, in connection with the formation of the Assessment
District, the City further impressed another parcel known as
Assessor Parcel No. 644-040-23 owned by one John and Rita
Gregory (commonly known to do business as J.T. Racing) and
referred to in said Engineer'S Report as Assessment No. 11, in
the amount of $21,942.00 with a payoff amount of $20,973.00; and,
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is appropriate to con-
tribute from Otay Valley Road Widening Capital Improvement
Project funds to the Assessment District for credit against
Assessment No. 6 because of the unusability of land due to slopes
and the existence of a sensitive impact area; and,
WHEREAS, the Council finds that it is appropriate to con-
tribute from otay Valley Road Widening Capital Improvement
Project funds to the Assessment District for credit against
Assessment No. 11 because they have submitted documentation for
actual costs expended on improvements already made to Otay Valley
Road in excess of those credited to them ($14,530.00) in the
approved Engineer'S Report;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
1. That City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
contribution in the amount $5,663.00 from the otay Valley Road
ovrasd1.wp
July 21, 1992
Reso re contribution to OVRAD
Page 1
c1 tJ O-:/C:
Widening Capital Improvement Project funds, Account No. 996-9960-
ST123, to the Assessment District for credit against Assessment
No.6.
2. That City Council hereby authorizes and directs the
contribution in the amount $20,973.00 from the otay Valley Road
Widening Capital Improvement Project funds, Account No. 996-9960-
ST123, to the Assessment District for credit against Assessment
No. 11.
3. This resolution shall take and be in full force and
effect immediately upon the passage and adoption hereof.
4 The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption
of this Resolution; shall enter the same in the book of original
Resolutions of said city; and shall make a minute of the passage
and adoption hereof in the minutes of the meeting at which the
same is passed and adopted.
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
Presented by:
John Lippitt
Public Works Director
ovrasdl.wp
July 21, 1992
Reso re Contribution to OVRAD
Page 2
Jb-~
CUSHMAN
ASSOCIATES
July 21, 1992
Mayor and City Council Members
City 9f Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
I have reviewed the staff's recommendation for the property
owned by my brother, Stephen, and myself. We differ with
that report in a few areas as outlined below:
There is an error in regards to the access situation.
Initially, back in the 1950's, access was provided via Otay
ValleY Road when this land was zoned residential. As land
was developed along Otay Valley Road, part of our access
disappeared via mapping difficulties. Upon notifying the
City of this situation, we were granted access via Timber
Street. This was acceptable to us since it provided access
to our residential land via residential streets. At that
time the layout of residential along our property with
Timber Street access worked well with our topography.
Many years later the City Council rezoned our property to
industrial. At that time we appeared at the hearing and
stated our concern of accessing via Timber for an
industrial use. The neighboring property on Brandywine who
instigated the zoning request stated that they were willing
to dedicate, and pay for 1/2 of the road across their
property to ours in order to get the zoning change. We
therefore agreed to the change. In addition, at,. the ti'!!!'....
we were told thata200'.sensitive ilDpa"t zone. 9P two (2)
sldes-';;-r'the-pro'pei"ty would he imposed: 'A"t 'th,,'he";;ri~gwe
were then asked to pay for the one half of the road
construction cost which was $57,500. We agreed and the
City recorded this obligation on our property, requiring us
to pay the $57,500 plus interest when we pulled a building
permit, which we have not yet done.
After a number of years passed, we then prepared a layout
of the buildings, as per the specific plan. ~fter having
gone through all the various committees, we appeared before
t he-reaeveTc;pme'j";'t'-c~~';;;i~-sion'TCitY'Coun ~iJ.~ ag r e e d we
had compl1ea with the requiremen'ts;"-bu( askeg./if we'cou-ra--
flip o"ur'1luiTdrng' soaslb ribtlfilve lo;'-dilfjf'd6t:1rn-"i'lrcilIg .
~efamiTYL"",j d,~.llJ.:ial. '
c2u ~7
At a great expense of both time and money we were able to
relayout the project, but only by the City giving
permission to encroach on some of the sensitive impact
areas. This was only able to occur by extra grading and
additional crib walls on the site. That plan was approved
with, the additional requirement of dedicating land RL~s
payingJ9r.the cul,.,.deo:.SJl.c."J3.C,l.pe.!"Jlg of Shi,u9h.;![a .1,,,n,,,,. '
Tl11s"'is estimated_~!_,~1_I,1lll0. Now we face an assessment
district WhICh we did not oppose, but felt we were entitled
to equity and fairness due to the unique circumstances of
this site.
I am enclosing a copy of a letter from William A. Steen
outlining the details of our request on these matters with
the City Engineering Department,
/~
:' 1;.
The three issues remaining are:
-~
/.
We are being given /no )credi t for the cost of
Shinohara Lane whi~we are obligated to--~'ay which
is '$57;"1l'O'O'pTils interest to the City. ThaT was
s up p 'Os-e'd ..to c 0 v era 11 5:: ().".t1l. _(l:f.Clff'",},Jl:11 t
c crn"sT-r;'~c:t.~!:"ojl:-'_.ro:~~pr-o~y.ide a .r e.y_i.S! e d-,~ ro, (,:lr:..s...."'t.Q~_O_ur~
property. (This resulted from the City rezoning
our 'property from residential to industrial and
removing our access from Timber Street.)
2.
The cost of $47,500 for installing the cul-de-sac
on Shinohara Lane.
3.
Not getting full credit for our 3.35 acres of
~-"~'-"""'''''''''',_..--.-.~,,,^
slop;s and sensitiveimpact areas. Proof of this
is'"'lo'c'ompare the ne'igh1ioring"Brandywine
industrial buildings that have 100,000 sq. ft. on
5.83 acres of land which equates'to our.,.lljt,Jlo,Q
sq. ft. (iIlcTiid'irig'mezzanine) on 6.20 acre,s", of,
.~ '__,.'.'.'~_M_.",.,"7-='",'"". ,_.;q~_.
useable land. William Steen has's'ubmitted the
verification of the 6.02 acres as being our
useable area which happ~~s to concur with the
adjo'ihing' parcel. Equity and fairness dictates
thaCwe should not be burdened with a higher
assessment per sq. ft. of buildings as our
adjoining parcel.
z. ' '-! .:_~
Our land is unique and different than any other
parcel simply because of the slopes, sensitive
impact areas and the extra costs we have incurred
in crib walls and grading to meet the request of
this Council in flipping our bUildings.
/)v/?'
Therefore, we hereby request the 3.35 acres of slope and
sensitive impact credit and credit of $47,500 for the
cul-de-sac and cancelling of our agreement dated October
28, 1986 by City Resolution number 12781.
Thank you very much for your consideration on this matter.
Enclosure
~O~
Iw~f WIllIAM A.~1EEN & A~.50CIATE.5
86 :~~~C~;~;'~rc, ~'l: F':;~~~:{~ '~;'~:A:~;.;~:~TN6::,~j~'~;~'~;~: N~':;~i .'~L;~'~'~ 'I~: ~;
July 21, 1992
Mr. Lawrence M. Cushman
Cushman Associates
2901 Fifth Avenue
San Diego, CA 92103
Re: Otay Valley Industrial Park
Dear Larry:
We have received the City of Chula Vista's staff report to the City Council
for the July 21, 1992 hearing and we would like to submit the following comments
that should be included in your request to the council.
As you know, we have recently met with Ms. Donna Snider and Mr. John Lippett
to review our request for the 3.35 acres of slope credit on your property. It
is our understanding that their recommendations to the council will be to grant
an additional 0.26 acres of credit resulting in a total credit of 2.66 acres
(2.40 + 0.26).
Our request of 3.35 acres of slope credit was substantiated by a calculation
of the representative slope area and a comparative assessment calculation to
the adjacent Brandywine industrial property to the east. Our letters, calculations
and maps are enclosed for reference.
Our comments on the staff report are as follows:
1. Page 2 states that we are requesting an additional slope credit of
1.15 acres. Our request as stated in the correspondence is only 0.95
acres with a resulting total of 3.35 acres.
2. Page 3 states that we are requesting special consideration because the
access to Otay Valley Road was reduced. Our request was for equal
consideration since the property had access to Otay Valley Road and
Timber Street that was changed by the City. In fact, Timber Street
would have been adequate access when the property was zoned residential
and was a viable access as planned on the adjacent subdivision map to
the west. However, since the property was rezoned to industrial by
the City, it was determined that is was necessary to provide alternate
access via the Cardon Meadows Industrial Park to the east to avoid
industrial traffic exiting into the residential area. Thus an agreement
was entered into that provided for the cost of all off site improvements
to serve the Cushman property.
c1o/jO
. 8580 LA MESA BLVD.. SUITE 102, LA MESA, CALIFORNIA 91941. (619) 460-9000 . FAX (619) 460-9005 .
r~( WILLIAM A.5TEEN & A.5.50CIATE.5
. CONSUL T:I'J'~ CIVI EN~l~~'~~~:.':L~~~':sURVEY'N'~-^::f';.~~l;Z~~"'~Nd
Mr. Lawrence M. Cushman
July 21, 1992
Page 2
In our opinion, the above facts justify the credits being requested of the
City of Chu1a Vista on the Assessment District.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM A. STEEN & ASSOCIATES
WAS:ss
~~~
William A. Steen
Enclosures
1/6219-101
· 8580 LA MESA BLVD., SUITE 102, LA MESA, CALIFORNIA 91941 . (619) 460-9000 . FAX (619) 460-9005 .
dO- ) /
~l ~i~~~~~~'~~~~i~~~:~4g~'~~~N~
July 20, 1992
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Attention: Donna Snider
Re: Cushman's Otay Valley
Industrial Park
Dear Ms. Snider:
Enclosed is a plan that represents the calculations of the 3.35 acres of
slope area credit that we outlined at our meeting last week. The details of
the slope representation along the southerly property line needs a further
,explanation.
As Mr. Cushman and I mentioned, the current site plan necessitated various
adjustments to accommodate the sensitive impact zone on the property. The 30'
parking setback on the west side was arbitrarily given to us as a goal to increase
the landscaping along the residential area. If this could have been reduced
to 10' we could have moved parking along the driveway on the east side. This
in turn would have eliminated the parking on the south side of the southerly
building and allowed a normal slope construction rather than the crib walls.
Accordingly, the slope area would be 0.95 acres rather than the 0.26 acres as
listed in your report.
Please give me a call when you have reviewed this information.
Very truly yours,
WILLIAM A. STEEN & ASSOCIATES
/~~~
WAS:ss
William A. Steen
cc: Lawrence M. Cushman
Enclosures
116219-101
dV/ ;;),
· 8580 LA MESA BLVD., SUITE 102, LA MESA, CALIFORNIA 91941. (619) 460-9QQQ.~ FA>': . H,; 13!L 4!lQ,9~.!!
July 1, 1992
MEMO TO:
The Honorable City Council
FROM:
Tim Nader, Mayor
SUBJECT:
PROCEDURE FOR REAPPOINTMENT - BOARD OF ETHICS
When the Board of Ethics was re-established by the City Council several years ago, it
was decided that the Presiding Judge of the local Municipal Court would be invited to
review, interview applicants and make recommendations to the City Council. To my
knowledge, the issue of handling appointments of second terms to those eligible and
wishing to serve was not adopted at that time.
There is one member of this Board eligible and wishing reappointment at this time. My
suggestion would be that we establish a uniform process. If we wish to keep the process
entirely removed from any concern of Council influence from the Board, my suggestion
would be to routinely notify the Presiding Judge as to who is eligible for reappointment
and request his recommendation before proceeding.
I wish to have input and direction from the City Council in this regard and have placed
this on the 7/21/92 agenda.
.L- . /I~A1-
ethics
cc: City Clerk
),1. b- /
"-'
LETTER TO STATE LEADERS
RECOMMENDED ADDRESSEES
Governor wilson
Senator Roberti
Senator Deddeh
Senator Hill
Senator Maddy
Assemblymember Brown
Assemblymember Isenberg
Assemblymember Hannigan
Assemblymember Hunter
Assemblymember Jones
Assemblymember Peace
Assemblymember Vasconcellos
Assemblymember Wright
l
moom~1i
July 21, 1992
The Honorable Pete Wilson
Governor
state of California
state Capitol Building
Sacramento, CA 95814
RE: STATE BUDGET CUTS - ALTERNATIVES AND OPTIONS
Dear Governor Wilson:
The City of Chula vista understands, from recent experience, the
crisis currently being faced by the State of California. As a
result of the implementation of the Proposition 13 property tax
rollback, the approval of the Proposition 4 spending limitation on
local government, and the application of SB 1225 to cities
regarding booking fees and property tax administration fees, local
agencies have had to cope with dramatically reduced state
subventions and revenues. The current recession has only
exacerbated this problem, both for the state and local governments.
The purpose of this letter is not only to offer support to the
State at this critical time, but also to propose alternatives to
assist in the timely and appropriate resolution of the state's
budget difficulties.
Because cities are the lifeblood of the economic vitality of the
state, it is desirable to retain as many funding sources as
possible which provide maximum flexibility to local government in
the development of new business ventures and enterprise activities.
This is not to say that we will not participate in the final
solution to the state's fiscal crisis; rather, that we wish an
alternative which is more acceptable in the preservation and
nurturing of the economy rooted at the local level.
Although the state has examined a variety of alternatives, the
latest revenue reduction proposal appears to take a substantial
portion of AB 8 property tax revenues as well as an undefined
portion of property tax increment from redevelopment agencies --
both of which are flexible revenue sources which enable local
government to be creative in efforts to encourage economic recovery
and growth.
r \
~}f}
The Honorable Pete Wilson
Page 2.
It is based upon our desire to fully cooperate with the state, as
well as the need to retain flexibility of available resources, that
the City of Chula vista offers the following alternatives.
Specifically it is proposed that the State of California:
* Re-evaluate the current revenue recovery proposal
to allow local agencies to retain a greater portion
of the AB 8 property tax revenues and property tax
increment and instead recapture uncommitted
redevelopment agency 20% Set-aside funds for
low Imoderate income housing. statewide it is
estimated that this fundinq source could oroduce
revenues to the state of aooroximatelv $150 to $200
million.
* Recapture the remainder of Ciqarette Tax revenues
currently allocated to local agencies, for a period of
three years. This would orovide $30 million in additional
revenues to the state oer vear.
The City of Chula vista .stands willing to share in the fiscal
restructuring of the state for the benefit of all Californians, and
by doing so, hopes to strengthen economic vitality rather than
destroy it. I ask you to take these recommendations and
alternatives under serious consideration when making your difficult
budgetary decisions.
Sincerely,
lID Wm ~d~' 1r
Mayor
cc: city Council
Advocation, Inc.
League of California cities
v
tyl-r '0