Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1979/05/08STATE OF CALIFO}~NIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF S2~q DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOUP~N~-~ENT OF ~[EETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, May 8, 1979 and said meeting was adjou. rned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on Wednesday, May 9, 1979 at the hour of 11:15 a.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of May 8, 1979 __ was held. Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 ~ ' ,/ ANE A, DIEDRJCHS " NO3~ PU~L C CALIFORNIA ial~fornla ' SAN DIEGO COUNTY NOtary i~C ~ a~d for sa~d Cog~ty M~ ~omm, expires J.~b] 22, ]980 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, May 8, 1979 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7:00 p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott Councilmen absent: None ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:35 p.m. until 5/12/79 (Budget Review) at 8:00 a.m.~m. in the Council Chambers~ E~b~XE~XE~ 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of May 8, 1979 MINUTES OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. May 8, 1979 A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, was held on the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue. ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Gillow, Scott Councilmen absent: None Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Deputy City Manager Robens Director of Planning Peterson, City Engineer Lippitt, Director of Parks and Recreation Hall, Fire Chief Longerbone, City Librarian Simon, Traffic Engineer Hansen The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde followed by a moment of silent prayer. "Open House" Mayor Hyde expressed his appreciation to the staff for the "open house" festivities held on May 7 for the new Civic Center complex. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimously carried that the minutes of the meeting of April 26 and May 1, 1979 be approved, copies having been sent to each Councilman. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY a. PROCLAMATION - A Proclamation was issued in recognition of the services PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF performed for the community hy the Public Works Department. MAY 20 THROUGH MAY 26, The City Engineer, John Lippitt, accepted the proclamation 1979 "NATIONAL PUBLIC from MaFor Hyde on hehalf of the Department. WORKS WE~Kii 3. ORAL COB~4UNICATIONS James.Matherly1 Mr. Matherly again spoke against the proposed passenger 402 Oaklawn Avenue train service from San Diego to Tijuana and stated the Chula Vista Metropolitan Transit Board should be disbanded. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. LETTER RE: ANNUAL The San Diego Gas and Electric Company expressed concern BUDGET ALLOCATION BY regarding the rate of increase in their annual budget SDG&E FOR RULE 20.A allocation for Rule 20.A Underground Conversions in the City UNDERGROUND CONVERSIONS of Chula Vista. They requested that the Council hold a study session on this subject at an early date. The City Manager recommended that this matter be scheduled for a Council Conference on June 28, 1979. Motion to schedule Item 4a It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman for Council Conference Gillow and unanimously carried that this matter be scheduled for a Council Conference as suggested on June 28, 19791 Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 2 - May 8, 1979 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES S. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde CONSIDERATION OF A~NDMENT opened the public hearing. TO GENERAL PLAN TO CHANGE APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES In a written report to Council, Director of Planning Petersol LOCATED AT THE NORTH~EST explained that this item involves a proposed amendment to QUADRANT OF "C" STREET AND the General Plan Diagram. The unincorporated territory in DEL MAR AVENUE FROM HIGH question was prezoned R-l, Single Family Residential, on DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO October 17, 1978 in anticipation that this property would MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL be annexed to the City. In April 1979 the Planning Com- mission recommended that the General Plan be amended in accordance with their Resolution GPA-79-S. Mr. Peterson noted that this amendment will bring the General Plan into conformance with the zoning as adopted last October. Annexation efforts moving In answer to a question from councilman scott, Mr. peterson slowly said efforts of Supervisor Hamilton are moving slowly to work out annexation of the northerly properties to National City and the southerly properties to Chuta Vista. Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. Sa. RESOLUTION NO. 9S8S Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was ADOPTING GPA-79-S FOR waived.by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the APPROXIMATELY 11 ACRES following vote, to-wit: LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF "C" STREET AND AYES: Councilmen'Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow DEL MAR AVENUE FROM HIGH Noes: None DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO Absent: None N~DIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 6. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde CONSIDERATION OF O~WIBUS opened the public hearing. AMENDMENT TO THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN Director of Planning Peterson stated the text of the Chula Vista General Plan has not been updated since 1970 and the proposed omnibus amendment to the General Plan is partially "housekeeping" in nature designed to eliminate conflicts between the Plan's text and Plan diagram and to update demographic forecasts and land-use policy. He added that this will bring the plan up-to-date with reference to E1 Rancho del Rey, the Bayfr0nt and the deletion of the San Miguel freeway. Mr. Peterson also commented on the pro- visions for allowing senior citizen housing in high density and very high density areas. The Planning Commission, on April 18, 1~79, recommended approval of the amendment to the General Plan in accordance with their Resolution GPA-79-7. Concerns that some areas Councilman Scott expressed his concern in three areas: covered may be premature whether the Bayfront should be considered at this time as additional changes may have to be made due to the Coastal Commission requirements; (2) the high density allowed for senior citizens has not yet Been determined by the Council and may be premature; and (3) the Council may wish to reconsider the density in the center city. Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. Recommendations considered The Council concurred that the recommendations be considered in sequence in the sequence indicated inExhibit "A" of Planning Com- mission Resolution GPA-79-7. Held T~esday - 7:00 p.m. - 3 - May 8, 1979. PUBLIC HBARINGSANDRELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES fCont,] BXHIB!T "A" - A. Page 25, paragrapkl - S~pping Center at 1-805 and East "H" Street GPA-7~-7 - O~qtBL1S A~ND~iNT Pxoposed text: To T~m CMULA VISTA GhN~RAL PLAN "The plan diagram indicates a major shopping center at the intersection ' of 1-805 and East "~' Street. This tenter, which would occupy 30 to -.. 40 acres of land, could be regional in scope, or accommodate a mixture · of regional, community, visitor, and/or recreational commercial useS." Mo~ion~Q approve 'It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded by Councilman Gillo~ 'SectiOn ~ that the proposed text of Section A' he approved. In response to a query from Councilman Co~, W~r. petorion said three amendments to the General Plan were permitted each year and by Council . policy, they are considered sometime in May and NoVember. He clarified ,~ that action can be continued on items tonight and it would still be counted as "one" amendment. MotfoR:carried The motion to approve Section A carried unanimously. B. Page 24, paragraph-3 - R~sidential~ensity in the Central Community The existing text indicates the density of the. residential area between the Chula Vista Shopping Center and the ,Third Avenue Business District is proposed .to increase from an average of 6 to 10 dwellingunits per net acre to over 30 as a result of th~ ~evelopmen~ o{ high rise apartmen' buildings. C~ncern regarding Councilman Scott expressed his concern regarding this Section, stating density he would prefer to hold this item and discuss it in mere detail with reference to the density along the proposed transit corridor of the passenger train to Tijuana. Suggestion to Council discussion followed with staff concerning the density of ~his continue items area under the existing General Plan text, the changes made in rezoning of concern the "neighborhoods in transition", and the possible need for additional information. It was Sdggested that itemsof concern be continued tea. meeting following the budget sessions. City Attorney Lindberg suggested that if discussion of items is post- poned, that the public hearing be continued. Motion to It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded by Councilman Scott and continue SeCtion B unanimously carried that the Council'set aside Section .B.for flirther.' study. . C. Page 2S - Very High Density Proposed text: '*Very High Density. This density category~s intended to designate area which would be characterized by high rise and garden apartments. Althou single family units would continue to exist withintheVery'High Density area in ~he early years of the planning period, ultimately these areas are expected to be almost exclusively multi-family in character. The .residential density of areas designated 'Very High Density' Should be considered as potential sites for senior housing ...... Motion to It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Giltow and Continue Section C unanimously carried that Section C be continued. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 4 - May 8, 1979 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS t~D ORDINANCES (Cont.) D. Pages 23 (bottom) and 24 (top) - Residential Density in the College area Proposed text: "The General Plan Map shows residential development expanding eastward into the mesas and foothills. Adjacent to "H" Street, north and west of Southwestern College, a limited area of medium density development is proposed to encourage development of an active community center for this new easterly area, and to meet the housing demand created, in part, by the college. This medium density area is expected to achieve a yield of about 6 to 10 families per gross acre. Terrace houses, cluster development, and garden apartments should constitute the pre- dominant dwelling types in this section of the community." Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman Gillow and Section D unanimously carried that Section D be approved for inclusion in the text. E. Pages 26 (bottom) and 27 (top) - Industrial Development in the Bayfront Community and Otay Ranch Proposed text: "The area proposed for industrial development in Chula Vista is located in a crescent shaped helt along the western, northern, and southern sides of the Planning Area. This belt includes portions of the Sweet- water and Otay Valleys, the Tidelands, and selected areas east of the Tidelands and west of Broadway. Proposed industrial development is divided into two classes: (1) general industry, and (2) limited and research industry. "General industrial use is proposed for a large part of the Bayfront Redevelopmerit Project Area and in the Otay Valley. Expansion and development of ocean shipping facilities by the Port of San Diego as proposed in their Tidelands Master Plan could spur industrial develop- ment in the Bayfront Community. This development would probably include manufacturing, processing, warehousing, and related commercial and commercial~office land uses. "It is the City of Chula Vista~s policy that the Bayfront area shall be redeveloped with recreational, visitor commercial, and residential land uses, as well as industrial uses in accordance with the adopted Bayfront Specific and Bayfront Redevelopmerit Plans." Suggestion for In answer to a request from Mayor Hyde and in response to his concerns modification Director of Planning Peterson suggested that the Council "strike" the second paragraph of the proposed text of Section E (starting with "General industrial use...") and substituting the following language: "General industrial designations are maintained in the vicinity of the SDG&E plant, the Rohr plant, and in the following locations for possib industrial expansion: (1) the area south of 'L~ Street; (2) the are east of Tidelands Avenue between 'F' and 'G' streets; and (3) the are at the northeast corner of 'J' and Tidelands." Motion to approve It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox and unanimously Section E with carried that Section E be approved with the language referred to (in modification the second paragraph) modified to reflect the wording recited by the Planning Director. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 5 - May 8, 1979 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.) F. Page 28 - San Miguel Freeway and Second Avenue Proposed text: "The freeway network serving Chula Vista will consist of the following elements: a. Montgomery Freeway (Interstate S) will continue to link Chula Vista (and its industrial belt) with Downtown San Diego to the north and Tijuana, Mexico to the south. b. The inland Freeway (Interstate 805] will provide a bypass of the industrial belt and provide access from the heart of the Chuta Vista residential area north to San Diego and south to Tijuana. c. The South Bay Freeway (Route S4) on the north side of Sweetwater Valley will provide good access to and from the northeast, La Mesa and E1 Cajon. It will also be the shortest route from the Industrial belt to U. S. Interstate 8 and the rapidly expanding Phoenix, Arizona area. d. Ths Otay Freeway (Route 7S) in the Otay Valley south of the Planning Area will provide east-west access from the Silver Strand to Brown Field." Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimously Section F carried that Section F be approved. G. Page 29 - North-South Major Road system Proposed text:' "The north-south Major Road system includes the following: a. Tidelands Avenue which traverses from the National City boundary through the tidelands industrial area to "J" Street. b. Broadway (or National Avenue) is the old north-south Highway. It intersects the major east-west thoroughfares and gives access to the Chula Vista Shopping Center. On this street is located the principal thoroughfare cormnercial development in the City. c. Fourth Avenue traverses Chula Vista from National City and the South Bay Freeway on the north to the southerly terminus of the Planning Area giving access to the Third AvenuerCivic Center area and the Chula Vista Shopping Center. d. Hilltop Drive serves as a major north-south thoroughfare'for the residential area east of Third Avenue. e. Otay Lakes Road provides access from the South Bay Freeway on the north to the Southwestern College com~,anity center and Telegraph Canyon, 'Its southerly extension to the Otay Valley is reserved for use ~af~er 198~0j' f. San Miguel-Proctor Valley artery, (formerly Route 125/San Migue] F~eeway) located in the far eaitern part of the Planning Area, will be the principal north-south major road of the Lakes Community." Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimously Section G carried that Section G be accepted as prepared by staff. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 6 - May 8, 19~9 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.) H. Page 31 - South County Civic Center Proposed text: "Civic Center/South County Civic Center .. "General Plan studies indicate that the existing Civic Center is appropriately located in the proximity of the Third Avenue BuSiness District and other major elements of central Chuta Vista. In the future, the Civic Center will contain expanded administrative facilities of the City. The South County Administrative Center - South Bay Courts Complex will be developed at the southwesterly quadrant of "H" Street and Third Avenue. This complex will he an integral part of the Chula Vista Town Centre No. 1 Project Area." Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Gillow, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimousl2 Section H carried that Section H be accepted. I. Page 18 ~ Population Projection Proposed text: "Table: Population Projection for Chula Vista Chula Vista Population in Chula Vista City Population San Diego City Population % of San Diego Region Region Year 19~ 4,1 1,033,000 42,034 1970 5.0 1,358,000 68,000 1975 4.8 1,557,000 75,000 1985 4.8 2,032,000 97,000 1995 5.3 2,460,000 131,000" Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman Gillow, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimousl Section I carried that Section I be accepted. J. Page 33 - Bayfront Development Proposed text: "The Bayfront Specific. and Red~velopment Plans depict a well-ordered balance of industrial, commercial, residential, and 'natural' land uses. The parks, promenades, and preserved marshes of the Bayfront will provide the residents and visitors of Chula Vist~ additional opportuniti for active and passive recreational purSuits~" Motion to approve It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded By Counci'lman'Cox and unanimously Section J carried that the proposed text be adopted. Suggestion to In answer to a query from Councilman Scott, Cit~ Attorney Lindberg continue public advised that the pu61ic hearing be continued and all items adopted in hearing one resolution. Motion to continue It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Gillow that all Item 6 - public elements of the Planning Commission Resolution GPA-79-7 be accepted, hearing (as modified), with the exception of Sections B and C; and that this matter be continued to apublic hearing to be conducted at a Council Conference. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m, - 7 - May 8, 1979 PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES (Cont.) Councilman Scott suggested that since this matter is being continued to a future meeting, that all items could be discussed then as making a decision now may be premature. Motion restated and carried It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow and unanimously carried that this public hearing be re-opened continued for the particular purpose of resolving Sections B and C and others, if needed - the hearing to be conducted at a Council Conference to be held on June 128, 1979. 6a. RESOLUTION -- (Continued until June 28, 1979) ADOPTING GPA-?9-? - AN O~qIBUS AMENDMENT TO THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN TEXT RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING 7. RESOLUTION NO. 9586 - By Resolution No. 9451, the comncil accepted the bid of APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR DataPhase for the installation of the computerized library THE SALE OF AUTOMATED information system. An agreement has been worked out LIBRARY INFORMATION specifying the obligations of all parties as to the delivery, SYSTEM setup, operation and training of personnel for the system, as well as the lease/purchase arrangements for a seven year period. Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Gillow, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent. Council discussion In response to a request from Councilman Scott, the staff gave a brief background on the agreement with discussion including maintenance costs, lease/purchase price, and a proposed security system to be considered during budget sessions. Resolution adopted The resolution was passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl~ Hyde Noes: Councilman Scott Absent: None 8. RESOLUTION NO. 9587 The Automatic Aid Agreement with the Montgomery Fire Protecti APPROVING A~NDMENT District (Resolution No. 8579) has been in effect since April TO JOINT FIRE PROTECTION 1977. At a meeting on April 10, 1979, the Fire Chiefs AGREEMENT WITH THE recommended that new territory be added to the agreement. MONTGOMERY FIRE PROTECTION The resolution approves the new boundaries included in the DISTRICT agreement. Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdah], Hyde, Gillow, Scott Noes: None Absent: None 9. RESOLUTION - In February 1979 the Council approved modified Alternative APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH 4 for the renovation of City Hall. Since that time, staff DONALD R. GOLDMAN AND has negotiated with Mr. Goldman to provide the architectural ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, services required. Mr. Goldman has submitted a proposal: to FOR RENOVATION OF CITY accomplish the project for a fee of $47,000. HALL AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS: Staff recommended that the agreement with Mr. Goldman be approved and that the expenditure of $51,700 be authorized from RS17 ($47,000 plus 10% contingencies). Resolution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent. Council discussion Councilman Scott questioned the procedure of appr0ving funds for the architect prior to the renovation project being approved in the budget. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 8 - May 8, 1979 RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (Cont.) Discussion followed concerning the possibility that the Council may determine not to continue with the renovation project; previous actions of the Council in approving the renovation project, including appropriation of $2S0,000 in 1978-79 budget; scope of the project was unknown last year; the time element involved with budget sessions start- ing next week and whether or not the timing would materially affect the agreement for architectural services. Deputy City Manager Robens said it would not be detrimental if this was postponed a week or so. Motion to continue It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman Item 9 Scott and unanimously carried that this item be continued to the first meeting after the budget sessions are completed 10. ORDINANCE NO. 1867 The ordinance establishes an enforcement procedure and a AMENDING THE CITY CODE new schedule of fees to become operative on July 1, 1979 RELATING TO PARKING at which time the City will assume the preliminary en- VIOLATIONS AND ENFORCEMENT - forcement procedure presently being administered by the FIRST READING Clerk of the South Bay Judicial District. Ordinance placed on It was moved by Councilman Scott that this ordinance be first reading placed on its first reading and that the reading of the text be waived by unanimous consent. AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow Noes: None Absent: None 11. REPORTCS) OF THE CITY MANAGER Budget review schedule City Manager Cole distributed a schedule for budget sessions starting on Saturday, May 12. Conflict with schedule Councilman Egdahl announced that he will have a conflict with two meetings - one on Monday evening and one on Wednesday evening. Budget review schedule Councilman Scott suggested the budget sessions be extended accepted if it is determined that Councilman Egdahl's participation is necessary. The Council concurred that the budget review schedule was acceptable. Crabb property sold Mr. Cole reported that the Crabb property has been sold, but not to the City. "Odd-even" gas Mr. Cole said the "odd-even" gas rationing has been approved rationing approved by the State and by the County Board of Supervisors. He will have copies of the rules for the service station opera- tors on Wednesday, May 9. The rules must be posted at each station, and the retail operators may call 236-3800 if they have any questions. Request for Executive The City Manager requested that an Executive Session be Session held for discussion of potential litigation. Motion for Executive It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Scott Session and unanimously carried that an Executive Session be held at the conclusion of the agenda as requested. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 9 - May 8, 1979 REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 12. REPORT ON PORPOSAL TO In March 1979, the Council considered several proposed INSTALL A RAISED CURB solutions to the traffic safety problem on East "L" Street MEDIAN ON EAST "L" between Melrose and Nacion Avenues, and staff was directed STREET AND/OR A TRAFFIC to bring back the cost comparison of a raised curb median SIGNAL AT EAST "L" STREET/ vs. a traffic signal to dete~rmine which project would compe~ MELROSE AVENUE for FY79-80 Capital Improvement Program funds. City Engineer Lippitt submitted an in-depth report noting a major concern was that the installation of a signal at Melrose would be more dangerous than the existing situation due to the short sight distance for westbound vehicles over the hill creating a potential for rear-end collisions. Staff recommended the installation of a raised curb median with the estimated cost at $47,000 (including necessary street widening) vs. $69,000 for a signal plus a yearly maintenance cost of $3,000 for the signal. Discussion Traffic Engineer Hansen briefly answered questions concern- ing left-turn pockets, and loss of parking, and provisions for "U" turns. J. O. Lee Solomon Mr. Solomon clarified that the 4-2 vote of the Safety Vice Chairman Commission was due to the fact that they favored a signal Safety Commission and a raised median, but did not agree on which would take priority, thus the final recommendation on the signal. Helen Paprocki Mrs. Paprocki read a letter submitted by G. R. Thomas of 942 Monterey Court 931 Monterey Court presenting arguments against the raised Chula Vista median and in support of the traffic signal. Mrs. Paprocki said she also supported the installation of a signal. Joseph G. Felber Mr. Felber commented on the increase in traffic in this 945 Monterey Court area created by the College and said the signals installed Chula Vista on "L" at First and Second were needed less than this one being requested. He was not in favor of the median. Felix Paprocki Mr. Paprocki spoke against the traffic pattern that would 942 Monterey Court be created by the raised median on "L" Street Chula Vista Best solution is both In answer to a question from Councilman Egdahl, Mr. Lippitt signal and median said if it was not a choice between the signal and the median, staff would recommend both as being the best solutio to the problem. Council discussion Council discussion followed concerning the various aspects of this problem - costs, accidents, speed control, left and right turns onto and off of "L" Street and the limited si~t distance at the crest of the hill. Motion for traffic It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox and divider unanimously carried that the staff recommendation be accepte and that the Council proceed and schedule for consideration under the Capital Improvement Program for next year a proj- ect which would call for the construction of a traffic divider lane between Melrose and Nacion on East "L" Street. David Love Mr. Love said he would not have purchased his home on 924 Monterey Court Monterey Court if he had known the Council would take the Chula Vista action they did this evening. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 10 - May 8, 1979 REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS PdND DEPARTMENT HEADS (Cont.) 13. REPORT ON EEASTER In a w~itten statement, the Director of Parks and Recreati0~ SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD reported that the Feaster School Neighborhood Par~, budget- PARK DEVELOPMENT ed in the 1978-79 Community Block Orant Program, is on the grounds of Feaster Elementary School and is being developed as a joint project by the City and the SchOol District. Construction is scheduled to start the week of June 18, 1979 with the grading and concrete work done bypriVate contractors and the irrigation, planting and equipment' installation done by City forces. Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by COuncilman Scott and unanimously carried that the report be accepted. 14. REPORT ON LANDSCAPING Director of Planning Peterson reported that the plan for ON THIRD AVENUE AT development of this property was approved in November 1978 NL~NNIS' OLD PROPERTY and the paving was delayed due to the rainy weather. He said the paving was completed shout 10 days ago and it is anticipated the landscaping will be installed soon in accordance with the plan. Staff will continue to monitor this situation. iS. REPORT ON LACK OF Mr. Peterson stated the plan does have landscaping pro- LANDSCAPING AT TEXACO visions and the delay was authorized pending the installati~ STATION ON BONITA ROAD of the sign. He said the sip. has now been instailed and staff has been in contact with the.developer who has been advised in writing that if the laadscaping is not installed! this matter will be turned over to the City Attorney. The developer has now informed staff that the landscaping will be started this week. MAYOR'S REPORT Move of Personnel In answer to a question from Mayor Hyde, City Manager Cole Department and referred to the memorandum from the Deputy City Manager disposition of annex concerning the removal of the annex at the Library and the move of the Personnel Department in the next few weeks. Invitation from Chula Mayor Hyde said a letter has been received from the Chula Vista Garden Club Vista Garden Club inviting the Councilmembers to attend the annual scholarship benefit luncheon at Rohr Manor at 4548 Sweetwater Road on Wednesday, May 16 at 12 noon. Lack of identification Mayor Hyde noted the Public Services Building does not for new building have an identification plaque. Motion for plaque for It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Scott Public Services Building and unanimously carried that an appropriate plaque similar to those of the Police facility and the Library be drafted, approved by the Council and installed. COUNCIL CONglENTS Interest of American Councilman Cox asked if the American Youth Hostel is still Youth HOstel in annex interested in using the annex building by the library. building City Manager Cole said a Mr. Dickson called yesterday. He was informed the usual procedure would be foliowed in disposing of the building and that the Deputy City Manager will keep him advised of the process. Held Tuesday ~ 7:00 p.m. - 11 - May 8,197~ COUNCIL COMMENTS (Cont.) Recommendation from Councilman Gillow referred to the memorandum from thg Visitor Industry Committee Visitor Industry Committee concerning the (Copley) report, noting that the Council had requested a recommendation on the report by May 1S, 1979. Motion to consider It was moved by Councilman Gillow,I seconded by Councilman report and recommendation Scott and unanimously carried that since this matter will on May 17 be considered during budget sessions on May 17, that the ' report be considered at that time. Item added to Councilman Gillow said he would liketo ad~ an:"Item. S~ to recommendation to support the memorandum that states the two v~s~tor centers would visitor centers be supported by the City. Pending items Councilman Gillow referred to the list of pending items submitted each week. He suggested it would be appropriate 4o review these items and determine those which should be considered and those which could be eliminated. Motion to consider It was moved by Councilman Gillow that an item be scheduled pending items at a at a Council Conference to look at all the pending items. Council Conference Mayor Hyde seconded the motion with the suggestion that it be modified and instead of a Council Conference that this be an agenda item at a regular meeting. Councilman Scott recommended that the Councilmembers rank these items individually and then make a joint decision. Motion restated Councilman Gillow changed his motion to state that this and carried matter be scheduled for a regular Council meeting in two weeks and to include Councilman Scott's suggestion. Mayor Hyde agreed to the second and the motion carried unanimously Status report on In answer to a request from Councilman Scott for a status visual aids to be report on the visual aid problem, Deputy City Manager Robens made next week said he has discussed this with the Architect and a report will be made to the Council next week. EXECUTIVE SESSION The meeting recessed to Executive Session at 9:04 p.m. with the City Clerk excused. The City Manager was appointed Deputy City Clerk Pro Tempore and he reported that the meet- ing reconvened at 9:33 p.m. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hyde adjourned the meeting at 9:36 p.m. to the budget session scheduled for Saturday, May 12, 1979 at 8:00 a.m. in the Council Chamhers. DEPUTY CITY CLERK