HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1999/03/02
CANCELLATION NOTICE
Notice is hereby given that the Regular Meeting of the city of
Chula vista City Council scheduled for Tuesday, March 9, 1999 at
6:00 p.m. will be cancelled due to lack of Agenda items.
The City Council will meet for their regularly scheduled meeting on
March 16, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. in the city Council Chambers.
~ ~ l~)
~, ~~
Susan Bige ow, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
UI declare un('!er r~!"\'1:ty of perju~y t~at 1 am
, <, ._ r r......"."" 'V;sta In the
employed by La ,,;;' ''''"::'.' .
Office of the eny L:;:;;-;(. en:: .,;:o~ I p03.ed
this Aaenda[Notice on the EJulie:in Boar(l at
the P~bliC sJ'v~es Building Obi ~r' .
DATED, :;, }: q7'SIGNED
"I declare uni~~!lI~1\f perjury that I am
emp!o:'ej b:ti:"~c {j-": (';" "':'"11:;] Vista in the
MARCH 2, 1999 Office ot: C '.'!' ii' .'J< I p3ed 4:00P.M.
this ACG;'1 :,~':;.;.Q~~,;l:' lia\n Goard at
CALL TO ORDER the Publi.~ 'crvi 'es Cu U" . end at City tdall on
DATED, ~sJ SIGNED f;/~'"
1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Mayor Horton.
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, MOMENT OF SILENCE
3. APPROY AL OF MINUTES ofJanuary 26, February 2, February 9, and February 16, 1999
(Regular Meetings of the City Council); and January 19, February 2, and February 9,1999
(Joint Meetings of the Redevelopment Agency and City Council).
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
A. Employee Recognition Award of the Month - Terry Strauwald, Department ofPublic
Works, Construction Repair Division. A proclamation will be presented by Mayor
Horton.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through ] 1)
The stafj recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent
Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion, without discussion, unless
a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City stafjrequests that the item be
removedfor discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak"form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk
prior to the meeting. Items pulledfrom the Consent Calendarwi/l be discussed after
Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of busine.u.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNlCATIONS
A. Letter from the City Attorney stating that, to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in Closed Session on February 16 and February 24, 1999,
there were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported.
Staff recommendation: The letter be received and filed.
6. ORDINANCE 2774, ADDING SECTIONS 5.28.020 THROUGH 5.28080 TO CHAPTER
5.28 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO TRIGGER LOCK AND SAFE
FIREARM STORAGE (SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
The San Diego Region has experienced accidental shootings which have resulted in injury and
death for a number of our young children. Adequate locking and storage of fireanns can
eliminate some of these tragic accidents. California Penal Code Section 13035 governs safe
fireann storage. However, it does not provide a method or direction for fireann owners to
obtain safety devices upon the purchase ofa fireann. Adding an effective safe fireann storage
requirement to the Municipal Code prevents the possibility of these tragedies from occurring
by requiring fireann dealers to provide safe storage devices with a fireann purchase.
Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption. (Chief
of Police)
Agenda
2
March 2, 1999
CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
7. ORDINANCE 2775, APPROVING THE OT A Y RANCH AMENDED SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA ONE PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT REGULATIONS
(SECOND READING AND ADOPTION)
The Otay Ranch Company has applied to amend the Otay Ranch SPA One Plan for the
Village One Core - Phase Seven (Purple Phase), and the area of Village One west of Pas eo
Ranchero (Village One West). The SPA One amendment implements the recently approved
Otay Ranch General Development Plan Amendments for Village One and Village One West.
The Village One Core area is 95 acres, expands the development area in Phase Seven (purple
Phase) consistent with the General Development Plan amendment, and modifies the design
of the "Main Street" concept. The Village One West amendment adds approximately 296.5
total developable acres and corresponding increase in the number of units in the area west of
Paseo Ranchero.
Staff recommendation: Council place the ordinance on second reading for adoption.
(Director of Planning and Building)
8. RESOLUTION 19381, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR FORMATION OF A
REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE PROCTOR V ALLEY TRUNK SEWER AND
CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 13, 1999 AT 6:00 PM. TO ESTABLISH
THE DISTRICT
In July of 1992, The Baldwin Company, the developers of the Salt Creek I development,
completed the installation of approximately 9,800 feet of sewer line in Proctor Valley Road.
This sewer facility was oversized to provide sewer capacity for all properties located within
the Proctor Valley gravity basin. Chapter 15.50 of the Municipal Code and Section 66485
of the Subdivision Map Act provide for the formation of reimbursement districts for
reimbursement for the construction of a facility which provides capacity exceeding the
development's needs. Due to ownership changes, the reimbursement district was not
established at that time. In November of 1998, a reimbursement fee study was submitted by
Wilson Engineering, engineering consultant for the current owners, Pacific Bay Homes.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
9. RESOLUTION 19382, APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF THREE
APPLICATIONS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1999/2000 2% NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORT A TION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANSPORTATION SALES
TAX (TRANSNET) FUNDS
The City annually submits an updated list of projects for inclusion in the seven-year
implementation program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted
to SANDAG in order for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors for funding. In
order for the application to be official, Council must approve a resolution authorizing
submittal of the fiscal year 1999/2000 Bicycle Project applications for available
Transportation Development Act and Transportation Sales Tax funds. Both funding sources
form a single fund, with annual allocations totaling $2.5 million for the San Diego region.
Projects are chosen and then approved for funding after the applications have been evaluated
by SANDAG's Bicycle Facilities Committee.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Agenda
3
March 2, 1999
CONSENT CALENDAR (Continued)
10. RESOLUTION 19383, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1998/99 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY CHANGING THE TITLE OF GG-131 TO CITY
CORPORATION YARD CONSTRUCTION AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM
THE AVAILABLE BALANCES IN THE SCOOT CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
($1,567,000) AND TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE FUND ($3,083,000) TO GG-
131 FOR THE PURCHASE OF PROPERTY AND EXISTING FACILITIES FROM SAN
DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED)
On September 15, 1998, Council approved an agreement with San Diego Gas and Electric
Company for the City's purchase of the South Bay Service Center located at 1800 Maxwell
Road. Staffindicated that they would return to Council for an appropriation when the escrow
costs and other financing information were known. As escrow is ready to close and funds are
necessary to pay for the South Bay Service Center, staff is returning as previously indicated
for an appropriation of the necessary funds
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
11. REPORT AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR
LEASE OF EXCESS PROPERTY ON THE ANIMAL SHELTER SITE
Council approved a contract with a consulting architect for design of a new animal shelter in
south Chula Vista on October 6, 1998. Design of the new facility, located at Beyer Way and
Fourth Avenue, is nearing completion, and construction is expected to begin later this year.
The shelter, kennels and related parking and service areas will occupy approximately 70% of
the 2.84 acre site. The remainder ofthe site will remain vacant until it is needed for expansion
of facilities. Council is requested to authorize the issuance ofa RFP to determine ifthere are
any businesses willing to lease, develop and operate compatible uses on the excess portion
ofthe site until it is needed for expansion.
Staff recommendation: Council accept the report and authorize staff to issue an RFP to
determine interest in leasing, developing and operating compatible businesses on the excess
portion of the animal shelter site on an interim basis (Chief of Police)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as
required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill out a "Request to
Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the
meeting.
12. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER PCM 95-0IB, AMENDING THE OTAY RANCH
SPA ONE PUBLIC FACILITIES FINANCING PLAN TO EXPEDITE OLYMPIC
PARKWAY CONSTRUCTION (CONTINUED FROM FEBRUARY 16,1999)
This is a proposal to amend the Otay Ranch SPA One Public Facilities Financing Plan,
changing the implementation threshold for Paseo Ranchero and Olympic Parkway.
Staff recommendation: The public hearing be continued to the meeting of March 16,1999.
(Director of Planning and Building)
Agenda
4
March 2, 1999
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial
discussions and deliberations by the Council, staff, or members of the public, The
items will be considered individually by the Council, and staff recommendations
may, in certain cases, be presented in the alternative, If you wish to speak on any
item, pleasefill out a "Request to Speak "form (available in the lobby) and submit
it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
13. RESOLUTION 19384, APPROPRIATING $40,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE FUND
BALANCE IN THE SEWERAGE FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND FOR A MINOR
SEWER REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON RIVER ASH DRIVE IN THE VICINITY OF
GOLD OAK COURT (4/5TH'S VOTE REQUIRED)
On May 26, 1998, Council approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for Tract 98-07, Bella
Navona. The Final Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement, and Supplemental
Subdivision Improvement Agreement were approved on October 13, 1998. During
construction of the off-site sewer facilities for the subdivision, it was discovered that a portion
of the existing sewer line is not acceptable for future maintenance purposes and must be
replaced. The City's Engineering Division concluded that the existing sewer line must be
corrected to a satisfactory condition in order to prevent any future maintenance problems.
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
OTHER BUSINESS
]4. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
A. Scheduling of meetings.
]5. MAYOR'S REPORTS
A Ratification of appointment to the Human Relations Commission - Samuel G. Avalos
(to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Jimenez, whose term will expire on June 30,
2000).
16. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Council member Davis
A. Ratification of appointment to the Mobilehome Rent Review Commission - Barbara
Worth (to fill vacancy created by Commissioner Smith, whose term expires June 30,
2002).
ADJOURNMENT to a Closed Session and thence to the Regular Meeting of March 9, 1999, at
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
***A meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately
following the City Council meeting. ***
"I declare under pen3:ty of perjury that I am
employed be' V C :., c; ...'.'J:3 Vista in the
QUice of the City C.;; :-; ~~ij:~ i :'~o~':cd
Tuesday, March 2, 1999 this Age~"a/Notice on the Bullet:n Beard at Council Chambers
4'00 p m the PUb"~'lli:(iF BUlldlnci'S:/ ~ Serv'lces BUI'ldl'ng
. .. tlATEO <-t <9 SIGNED C .
(immediately following the City Counclt )Xl ::::...-"
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CLOSED SESSION AGENDA
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. Unless the City
Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss
and deliberate on the following items of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a
closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to
best protect the interests ofthe City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue
any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical
length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order
to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of final action taken, and
adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded
in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING:
. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a)
1. City ofChula Vista v. Federal Home Loan Corporation.
2. Workers Compensation Claim Numbers 1090123; CH930090; CH950009;
CH950140.
2. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
February 25, 1999
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council /' \J I
David D. Rowlands, Jr., City Manage~t ~ ~
City Council Meeting of March 2, 1999
TO:
SUBJECT:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, March 2, 1999, Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as follows:
5a, This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that to the best of his knowledge
from observance of actions taken in Closed Session on 2/16/99 and 2/24/99, there
were no actions taken which are required under the Brown Act to be reported,
IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECENED AND FILED.
DDR:mab
~~~
ii!I!iiii
~~~~
- ~~~
C1lY OF
CHUlA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date:
February 25, 1999
From:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John M, Kaheny, City Attorney~
Report Regarding Actions Tak~~~ 'Closed Session
for the Meetings of 2/16/99 and 2/24/99
To:
Re:
The City Council of the City of Chula vista met in Closed Session
on 2/16/99 to discuss:
Conference with Real Property Neqotiator - Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956,8:
Property:
Approximately 1,000 acres, Assessor
Parcel Numbers 644-070-01; 644-080-07;
644-080-09, and 644-080-10
City of Chula Vista, New Millenium, Home
Federal Leucadia National, EastLake, otay
Ranch Company, and McMillin
Terms and conditions for disposition of
real property.
Negotiating Parties:
Under Negotiation:
The City Council of the city of Chula Vista met in Closed Session
on 2/16/99 and 2/24/99 to discuss:
Conference with Real Propertv Neqotiator - Pursuant to Government
Code Section 54956.8:
Property:
Approximately 7 acres located on Bonita
Road adjacent to the Chula Vista
Municipal Golf Course
City of Chula vista (Chris Salomone) and
Diamond Development Company
Purchase price/lease rate and other terms
and conditions for possible disposition
of city-owned property.
Negotiating Parties:
Under Negotiation:
The City Attorney hereby reports to the best of his knowledge from
observance of actions taken in the Closed Session in which the City
Attorney participated, that there were no reportable actions which
are required under the Brown Act to be reported,
JMK: Igk
SI? - )
276 FOURTH AVENUE' CHULA VISTA' CALIFORNIA 91910 . (&19) 691-5037 . FAX (619)
409-5823
.;;0' PooI-Gon.un!rRolt',dedP~
(Attachment C)
r.fS?1\O....
~o ~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA ~~~~ING
SECTIONS 5.28.020 THROUGH 5.28.2~~~~TER 5.28 OF
THE CHULA VISTA MUNlCIPAGl~ODE RELATED TO
TRIGGER LOCK AND SAFE FIREARM STORAGE.
ORDINANCE NO. 1 i ') i
The City Council of the City ofChula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That Chapter 5.28 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is hereby amended by adding
Sections 5.28.020 through 5.28.080 to read as follows:
5.28.020
Purpose.
The purpose of this section related to trigger lock and safe firearm storage is to reduce the
incidents of accidental gun deaths caused by the unintentional discharge of a loaded firearm. Ten
percent of all gun deaths in the United States are caused by accidental or unintentional discharge
ofa loaded firearm. One out of three deaths from accidental firearm discharges could be
prevented by a firearm safety device. Most children who accidentally injure or kill themselves or
a friend, do so while playing with a loaded firearm found in their home or a friend's home. The
number of accidental deaths and injuries attributed to firearms and other weapons is unacceptable
and warrants stricter control over the handling and storage of lawful firearms. Firearm owners
have a responsibility to keep the public safe from the consequences associated with the
proliferation and unsafe storage of firearms. Trigger locks or other similar devices, when
properly used, can prevent the accidental discharge of firearms. This city has an interest in
encouraging firearm owners to store their firearms in a safe manner and out of the reach of
children.
5.28.030
Definitions.
The purposes of this chapter, the below terms are defined as follows:
(a) "Firearm" means any device, designed to be used as a weapon or modified to be used as a
weapon, from which a projectile is expelled through a barrel by the force of explosion or
other form of combustion.
(b) "Firearm dealer" means any person licensed by the City pursuant to California Penal
Code Section 12071 for the retail sale of firearms within the City ofChula Vista.
"Firearm dealer" shall not include persons involved in transactions excluded under
California Penal Code Section 12070.
~.--1r7 t: ~ /
Ordinance
Page 2
(c) "Safe firearm storage device" or "safe storage device" shall mean any of the following
devices, the proper use of which will prevent the unintentional discharge of the firearm:
I. A lockable hard plastic or metal box capable of covering the whole of the firearm
sold. The box shall have, or shall be provided with, a lock.
2. A soft case with an outer shell made with a heavy canvas or ballistic nylon
capable of covering the whole fireann sold, The case shall have a zipper capable
of being locked shut. The soft case shall have, or shall be provided with, a lock.
3. Any type of reusable locking device that is capable of rendering the fireann sold,
leased, or transferred inoperable, when properly installed by keeping the trigger
from releasing the sear thereby dropping the firing pin, or locking the action of the
fireann open so it will not go into battery. Any device integrated into the fireann
by the manufacturer which meets the criteria of this paragraph shall qualify as a
safe fireann storage device.
4. All locks or locking devices sold, furnished or made available, in order to comply
with the provisions of this chapter shall have a key or a combination with at least
three tumblers.
A firearm "safety" shall not be considered a safe storage device for purposes of this Chapter.
5.28.040
Provision of Safe Firearm Storage Device.
(a) It is unlawful for any fireanns dealer to sell, lease or otherwise transfer ownership of any
fireann without also providing with the fireann a safe fireann storage device designed to
prevent the unintentional discharge of the fireann being sold, leased, or transferred.
(b) The safe fireann storage device shall be locked in place, properly attached to, or properly
covering, the fireann at the time it leaves the fireann dealer's premises.
(c) Nothing in this Chapter shall prevent the fireann dealer from recovering the cost of
providing a safe fireann storage device by charging a price for the safe storage device,
either separately or as part of the price of the fireann.
)0
="'-
gx:c:
1)
(-:J
~
r:; -~
"
Ordinance
Page 3
5.28,050
Provision of Safe Firearm Storage Materials.
It is unlawful for any firearm dealer to sell, lease or otherwise transfer ownership of any
fireann without providing with the fireann printed material. approved by the Chief of Police, that
advises the user of safe firearm storage practices.
5.28.060
Acknowledgment of Receipt by Purchaser.
In connection with the sale, gift, loan or transfer of a firearm, the firearms dealer shall
obtain from the person receiving the firearm a signed acknowledgment that a trigger Jocking or
similar device required by Section 5.28.030 and the printed material required by Section
5.28.050 has been provided with the firearm. The acknowledgment shall be in a fonn approved
by Ihe Chief of Police. The firearms dealer shall retain signed acknowledgments of receipt in the
same manner and to the same extent as required by State law for other firearm transaction
records.
5.28.070
Representations.
A firearms dealer who has fully complied with the provisions of this section relating to
trigger locking or similar devices shall not be presumed to have made any representation to the
transferee regarding the safety or appropriateness of the use of the trigger locking or similar
device, nor shall the firearms dealer be liable in any civil action brought against the fireanns
dealer, to the extent such liability would be based solely upon the act of furnishing the trigger
locking or similar device to a person in compliance with this section,
5.28.080
Exceptions.
(a) The requirements of Section 5.28.040, 5.28.050 and 5.28.060 shall not apply to fireanns
that have been determined by the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
Fireanns, Department of Treasury, to be curios or relics under federal law.
(b) The requirements of Section 05.28.40, 5.28.50 and 5.28.60 shall not apply to firearms
rented at a licensed range for use on the range and shall not apply to temporary lending
transactions in which the firearm does not leave the premises of the firearm dealer.
SECTION 11: The requirements of Section I, shall be enforced and effect, and shall apply to all
fireann dealers now and hereafter licensed, thirty days after the date on which the Chief of Police
sends written notice to currently licensed firearm dealers of the approved trigger locking or
similar devices, printed safety material and form of acknowledgment.
~~ &-3
Ordinance
Page 4
SECTION III: Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional for any reason by any court or competent
jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such
holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
'-
~flQQW1rt,~w)p1
John M. Kahen
City Attorney
vi
,,-,,/()-/O-.r-;; /t;
~-y
~
) 'I 7})
ORDINANCE NO. ~,
r\'O~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TI!.~ITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE OTAY~NCH
AMENDED SECTIONAL PLANNING A~(~PA) ONE
PLANNED COMMUNITY DlSTRIC~~ULATIONS
(PCM 97-11) ~:v
....0
c.,."v
c)
WHEREAS, an application for adoption of the Otay Ranch Amended Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) One Plan was filed with the City ofChula Vista Planning Department on January 14,
1997 by the Otay Project, LLC ("Applicant"); and,
WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch Amended SPA One PJanned Community District
Regulations ("Project") are intended to ensure that the SPA One Plan is prepared in accordance
with the Otay Ranch General Development PJan (GDP), to implement the City ofChula Vista
General Plan for the Eastern Territories, to promote the orderly planning and long term phased
development of the Otay Ranch GDP and to establish conditions which will enable the Otay
Ranch Amended SPA One to exist in harmony within the community; and,
WHEREAS, these Amended Planned Community District Regulations are established
pursuant to Title 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, specifically Chapter 19.48 PC Planned
Community Zone, and are applicable to the Otay Ranch SPA One Land Use Plan of the
Amended SPA Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
Project and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City and its mailing to property owners and tenants
within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing;
and,
WHEREAS. the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised on February 3,
1999 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission; and,
WHEREAS, by a vote of6-0 the Planning Commission approved the project; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted a Second-tier Final
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) EIR 97-03, and Findings of Fact and a Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program have been issued to address environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the Project; and,
WHEREAS, this Second-tier EIR incorporates, by reference, three prior EIRs: the Otay
Ranch General Development Plan/Subregional Plan (GDP/SRP) EIR 90-01, certified by the
Chula Vista City Council and San Diego County Board of Supervisors on October 28,1993; the
1
~ 1~/
Chula Vista Sphere of Influence Update EIR 94-03, certified by the Chula Vista City Council on
March 21, 1995; and the SPA One EIR 96-01, as well as their associated Findings of Fact and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, certified by the Chula Vista City Council on June
4, 1996; and
:'<OW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula
Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows:
I. PLA.~NING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the P]anning Commission at their
public hearing on the final EIR held on October 21, 1998, their public hearing held on
this project on November 3, 1998 and the minutes and resolutions resulting therefrom, are
hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. These documents, along with any
documents submitted to the decision makers, shall comprise the entire record of the
proceedings for any California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) claims.
II. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council hereby finds that the Project, as described and analyzed in the FEIR 97-
03, would have no new effects that were not examined in said FEIR (Guideline 15168
(c)(2)); and
III. CEQA FINDING REGARDING PROJECT WITHIN SCOPE OF PRIOR
PROGRAM EIR
The City Council hereby finds that: (1) there were no changes in the Project from the
FEIR97.03 and the FEIR which would require revisions of said reports; (2) no substantial
changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is
undertaken since the previous reports; (3) and no new information of substantia]
importance to the Project has become available since the issuance and approval of the
prior reports; and that, therefore, no new effects could occur or no new mitigation
measures will be required in addition to those already in existence and made a condition
for Project implementation, Therefore, the City Council approves the Project as an
activity that is within the scope of the project covered by the FEIR 97-03, (Guideline
15168(c)(2) and 15162(a)).
IV. INCORPORATION OF ALL REASONABLE MITIGATION MEASURES AND
AL TERNA TIVES-
The does hereby readopt and incorporate herein as conditions for this approval all
applicable mitigation measures and alternatives, as set forth in the findings adopted in the
GDP approval (90-01) and SPA approval (95-01).
2
...;hI/I - ;k
(/
7-,2
,
V. NOTICE WITH LATER ACTIVITIES
The City Council does hereby give notice, to the extent required by law, that this Project
was fully described and analyzed and is within the scope of the FEIR 97-03 and
adequately describes and analyzes this project for the purposes of CEQA (Guideline
15168(e)). Notice on the EIR was given on November 10, 1998.
VI. ACTION
The City Council hereby approves the ordinance adopting the Planned Community
District Regulations for the Otay Ranch Amended SPA, finding that they are consistent
with the City ofChula Vista General Plan and that the public necessity, convenience,
general welfare and good zoning practice supports their approval and implementation.
VII. This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force the thirtieth day from its adoption.
WSHAREOA rrORNEY,ORDINANC.WPO
,
.)
~
/)
1-7
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 'i!"
Meeting Date 3/2/99
Resolution ) 9.3 'it' / Initiating proceedings for formation of a
reimbursement district for the Proctor Valley Trunk Sewer and calling a
public hearing for April 13, 1999 at 6:00 p,m. to establish the district
Director of Public Work~ K
City Manag~ ~ ~\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
In July of 1992, The Baldwin Company, the developers of the Salt Creek I development completed
the installation of approximately 9,800 feet of sewer line in Proctor Valley Road, This sewer facility
was oversized to provide sewer capacity for all properties located within the Proctor Valley gravity
basin. Chapter IS .50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and Section 66485 of the Subdivision Map
Act provide for the formation of reimbursement districts for reimbursement for the construction of
a facility which provides capacity exceeding the development's needs, Due to ownership changes
the reimbursement district was not established at that time, In November of 1998, a reimbursement
fee study was submitted to the City by Wilson Engineering, engineering consultant for the current
owners, Pacific Bay Homes, Staff has completed its review of this study and recommends that a
reimbursement district for the Proctor Valley Sewer be formed,
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution initiating the Reimbursement
District proceedings.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable,
DISCUSSION:
On September 12, 1989, by Resolution 15299, the City Council approved the Tentative Map for the
Salt Creek I Subdivision, Chula Vista Tract No. 89-9. Due to the lack of a gravity sewer in the area,
the developer (The Baldwin Co.) proposed to install a sewer pump station to discharge into the
Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. On May 14, 1991, the City Council approved a proposal to provide
an offsite gravity sewer line, instead of the pump station. The gravity sewer was constructed under
Proctor Valley Road and connected to the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer facilities.
Resolution 15299 required the developer to provide excess capacity, beyond the Salt Creek I
requirements, to serve all properties located within the Proctor Valley basin, Construction of the
Proctor Valley Sewer was completed in July of 1992.
In November of 1998, Wilson Engineering prepared a report entitled "Proctor Valley Trunk Sewer
Reimbursement Fee Study," The financial analysis of the reimbursement district will take this study
into account, along with the previous assessments against the Salt Creek I development. In
accordance with Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the attached letter from Pacific
Bay Homes, dated January 13, 1999, shall serve as a formal request to initiate the district formation
proceedings, Funds were received from Pacific Bay Homes in the amount of $5,000 to cover
'D~/
Page 2, Item_
Meeting Date 3/2/99
expenses for the formation of the district. Upon approval of this item in accordance with Chapter
15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code and Section 66485 of the Subdivision Map Act the
Director of Public Works shall prepare the following:
A. A map describing the benefited area which identifies all parcels within the area;
B. The total cost of the facilities including incidental expenses;
C. An estimate ofthe excess costs;
D. An estimate of the assessment and spread thereof necessary to equitably pay
the excess costs,
The reimbursement shall be subject to an annual seven percent interest charge as provided in Section
15.50.090. Six percent of which shall be payable to the Pacific Bay Homes for the advancement of
funds and one percent shall be payable to the City general fund to cover administrative costs in the
handling and collection of such funds. The reimbursement is to be collected when the benefitted
parcels subdivide or apply for building permits, The interest shall be calculated on a quarterly basis
and shall include the total number of full quarters from the date of commencement up to but not
including the quarter in which payment of such charges are paid. The date of commencement shall
be the date the district is established, tentatively April 13, 1999.
The district formation process will involve the following steps:
1. Notice
a. Publish a notice of public hearing pursuant to Municipal Code 15,50.080.
b. Mail notice of public hearing.
2. Conduct public hearing.
3. City Council shall approve the cost allocations by a resolution stating ownership, legal
description and amount of charges for each parcel within the district, at which time the
district will be considered formed.
5. City Clerk shall record a copy of the resolution with the County Recorder.
6. The reimbursement will be collected when benefited parcels subdivide or apply for building
permits.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost of forming the district will be reimbursed by the district. Also the cost
of administering the district will be covered by a 1 % annual interest charge.
File No. 780-1 O-K Y222
Attachment
H:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \PVREIMBD.DCD
Z-7-
RESOLUTION NO, /7":J 'f5 /
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA INITIATING PROCEEDINGS FOR
FORMATION OF A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR THE
PROCTOR VALLEY TRUNK SEWER AND CALLING A
PUBLIC HEARING FOR APRIL 13, 1999 AT 6:00 P.M,
TO ESTABLISH THE DISTRICT
WHEREAS, in July of 1992, the Baldwin Company, the
developers of the Salt Creek I development completed the
installation of approximately 9,800 feet of sewer line in Proctor
Valley Road; and
WHEREAS, said sewer facility was oversized to provide
sewer capacity for all properties located within the Proctor Valley
gravity basin; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 15,50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
and Section 66485 of the Subdivision Map Act provide for the
formation of reimbursement districts for reimbursement for the
construction of a facility which provides capacity exceeding the
development needs; and
WHEREAS, due to ownership changes, the reimbursement
district was not established at that time; and
WHEREAS, in November of 1998, a reimbursement fee study
was submitted to the City by Wilson Engineering, engineering
consultant for the current owners, Pacific Bay Homes; and
WHEREAS, staff has completed its review of this study and
recommends that a reimbursement district for the Proctor Valley
Sewer be formed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista does hereby direct the city Manager to initiate
proceedings for formation of a reimbursement district for the
Proctor Valley Trunk Sewer.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
set Tuesday, April 13, 1999 at the hour of 6:00 p.m., or as soon
thereafter as may be heard, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula vista, California as the date and time for a public
hearing to consider the formation of a reimbursement district,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby
directed to advertise the public hearing and notify affected
persons by mail in accordance with Section 15,50,080 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John p, Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
~~hW/ ~
J n M. Kah y, City ltttorney
H,\home\attorney\reso\reimburs.pvs
? --- ;J
pa~g-icbay
HOVIE5
January 13, 1999
Alex AI-Agha
City of Chu]a Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista CA. 91910
Re: Proctor Valley Road Sewer Reimbursement Agreement
Dear Alex,
As you are aware, we have submitted a revised study for the construction costs
reimbursement of the Proctor Valley road Offsite sewer line. Pacific Bay Homes has been
pursuing this reimbursement for several years and we feel it is very important to keep the
process moving in a expeditious fashion until its conclusion.
To this end, we respectfully request that you immediately continue the review of the
study and its processing. Unfortunately our experience has been once these type of items
have been allowed to languish details our forgotten and previous conversations and
agreements cannot be recalled.
I would like to see a schedule of completion that would bring resolution to this matter by
the end of February, 1999.
Should you need any additional information please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely
p~ B:;:
Guy Asaro
Project Manager
/~
2300 ",,,,,ell Road.l~(i:hula Vlsla. C\\"lUH
l~19'1 656-430l'. Fax (619) 65b-4J06
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item 9
Meeting Date 3/2/99
Resolution / 9.s iT.2... Approving the submittal to SANDAG of three
applications for the FY 1999-00 2% Non-Motorized Transportation
Development Act (TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works I
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
The City of Chula Vista annually submits an updated list of projects for inclusion in the 7 -year
implementation program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program. SANDAG regulations require that official applications be submitted to
SANDAG in order for projects to be considered by its Board of Directors for funding. In order
for the application to be official, Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the
FY 1999-00 Bicycle Project applications for available Transportation Development Act (TDA) and
Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds. Both funding sources form a single fund with annual
allocations totaling $2.5 million for the San Diego region, Projects are chosen and then approved
for funding after the applications have been evaluated by SANDAG's Bicycle Facilities
Committee.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve a resolution approving the submittal to SANDAG
of three applications for the FY 1999-00 2% Non-Motorized Transportation Development Act
(TDA) and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Annually, the 2% Non-Motorized Transportation Development Act (TDA) Funds are made
available for the regional planning and construction of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. TDA
funds will contribute about $1.5 million in FY 1999-00 to the implementation of non-motorized
projects in the San Diego region, Also, with the passage of Proposition A in 1987, an additional
$1 million of TransNet revenues per year is available for the implementation of said projects that
are submitted annually by the Cities and the County. The following is a description of the project
applications that we propose to submit to SANDAG for FY 1999-00 funding:
1) Signing and striping, bicycle lane and route program: Installation of bicycle route signs
and bicycle lane striping along sections of "J" Street and East "H" Street. This project
will complete all striping and signing requirements on designated bicycle routes and lanes
identified in the City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan. Total application request is
$56,500,00.
2) Sidewalk improvements on the west side of Fourth Avenue south of Orange Avenue:
Installation of sidewalk improvements in the SDG&E easement area of Fourth Avenue
south of Orange A venue will increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the City's new
5--/
Page 2, Item_
Meeting Date 3/2/99
library. Substantial pedestrian traffic is being generated by the new library at the southeast
corner of Orange and Fourth Avenues. In combination with recently completed sidewalks
in the area, this project will provide a safe walking route for students and other pedestrians
between the library and surrounding neighborhoods. Total application request is
$46,000,00.
3) Fourth Avenue between Brisbane Street and SR-54: The proposed project will consist
of widening the north east corner of Fourth A venue and Brisbane Street. This proposed
project will help alleviate the traffic congestion in this area during the peak hour periods and
will result in improved circulation for motorists and bicyclists, Total application request is
$72,000,00,
Project components that are eligible for TDA funding include the removal of eXlstmg
improvements, grading work, installation of sidewalk, and pedestrian ramps, Eligible items also
include traffic control, protection and restoration of existing private improvements, required
drainage improvements, and contingencies covering design and inspection, The following table
shows the total costs for each project. The Gas Tax contributions will cover the cost of TDA
ineligible items, Gas Tax Funds can be used in the building or rebuilding of streets, roads,
bridges, and acquisition of rights of way or their component parts to a degree that improved traffic
service is provided and geometric or structural improvements are affected including allocated
administration and engineering. This description is based on Section I of Chapter 2 of the
guidelines relating to Gas Tax expenditures, Division of Local Government Fiscal Affairs. The
Gas Tax requests will be submitted as part of the CIP review and approval process.
Proiect TDA Fund Gas Tax Fund Total
1. Bicycle Lane/Route Program $56,500.00 $56,500.00
2. Fourth Ave, South of Orange Ave. $46,000.00 $23,000.00 $69,000.00
3. Fourth Ave. South of SR 54 $72,000.00 $38,000.00 $110,000.00
TOTAL $174,500.00 $61,000.00 $235,500.00
Projects submitted to SANDAG must meet at least the following criteria:
1. Projects must be included in an adopted regional plan.
2. Bicycle projects must follow the CALTRANS Standards in the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual.
3. Each project submitted must contain a location map, project limits and appropriate cross
sections.
9~A
Page 3, Item_
Meeting Date 3/2/99
4. The City Council must approve the projects being submitted for funding.
Projects are also subject to prioritization criteria such as elimination of safety problem areas on
routes which would provide relatively safe travel use, service to high use activity centers
(economic, educational, cultural, recreational), local effort in developing the pedestrian or bicycle
project, and connection to and continuity of longer routes provided by other means (e.g., regional
park trails).
The FY 1999-00 application will be reviewed by the Bicycle Facilities Committee which is
composed of representatives from each SANDAG member agency. Based on the Committee's
recommendations, the SANDAG Board of Directors will authorize allocation of the available TDA
and TransNet funds.
A copy of the application's package is located in the City Clerk's Office for Council's review.
FISCAL IMPACT: Potential total revenues to the City of $174,500. The actual amount is
dependent upon which of the projects is approved for funding by the SANDAG Board of Directors
and the amount that they approve. This resolution approves the submittal of the applications, and
does not formally approve the implementation of the projects. These projects will be submitted
for approval in the FY 1999-00 CIP.
RDJ:rdj
2/17/99 (3:39 pm)
File No.: 0690-20-KY036
H: IHOME\ENGINEER\ADVPLAN\98A- TDM.RDJ
9--3
RESOLUTION NO,
/95Y~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL TO SANDAG OF THREE
APPLICATIONS FOR THE FY 1999-00 2% NON-MOTORIZED
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX (TRANSNET) FUNDS
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista annually submits an
updated list of projects for inclusion in the 7-year implementation
program of the non-motorized element of the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program; and
WHEREAS, SANDAG regulations require
applications be submitted to SANDAG in order for
considered by its Board of Directors for funding;
that official
proj ects to be
and
WHEREAS, in order for the application to be official,
Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the FY
1999-00 Bicycle Project applications for available Transportation
Development Act and Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet) Funds; and
WHEREAS, the following is a description of the project
applications to be submitted:
Installation of bicycle route signs and bicycle lane
striping along sections of "J" Street and East "H" Street
to complete all striping and signing requirements on
designated bicycle routes and lanes identified in the
City of Chula vista Bikeway Master Plan.
Installation of sidewalk improvements in the SDG&E
easement area of Fourth Avenue south of Orange Avenue to
increase pedestrian safety and accessibility to the
City's new library,
Widening the northeast corner of Fourth Avenue and
Brisbane Street to alleviate the traffic congestion in
this area during peak hour periods which will result in
improved circulation for motorist and bicyclists.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the submittal to SANDAG
of two applications for the FY 1999-00 2% Non-Motorized Transpor-
tation Development Act (TDA) Fund and Transportation Sales Tax
(TransNet) funds.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John p, Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
/t.~
M. Kaheny,
torney
H:\home\lorraine\rs\2%NONMOT
9~r
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J IJ
Meeting Date 03/02/99
ITEM TITLE: Resolution I ?3 Y~mending the FY 98-99 Capital Improvement
Program by Changing the Title of GG-131 to City Corporation Yard
Construction and Appropriating Funds from the Available Balances in the
SCOOT Capital Project Fund ($1,567,000) and Trunk Sewer Capital
Reserve Fund ($3,083,000) to GG-131 for the purchase of property and
existing facilities from SDG&E.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works;) / C\ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~W' ~\ (4/5THS vote: Yes.lL No_
On September 15,1998, by Resolution 1916PCouncil approved an agreement with San Diego
Gas and Electric Company for the City's purchase of the South Bay Service Center located at
1800 Maxwell Road. In that agenda statement, staff indicated that they would return to Council
for an appropriation when the escrow costs and other financing information were known. As
escrow is ready to close and funds are necessary to pay for the South Bay Service Center, staff
is returning as previously indicated for an appropriation of the necessary funds.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt the resolution amending the FY 98-99 Capital Improvement Program by
changing the title of GG-131 to City Corporation Yard Construction and appropriating funds
from the available balances in the SCOOT Capital Project Fund ($1,567,000) and Trunk Sewer
Capital Reserve Fund (3,083,000) to GG-131.
BOARDICOMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
Staff has performed due diligence items required during escrow and is ready to close escrow
and take possession of the former SDG&E South Bay Service Center at 1800 Maxwell Road.
As was indicated in the September 15 agenda statement (attachment A), the purchase price of
this site is seven million dollars ($7,000,000). In addition, closing costs are expected not to
exceed $10,000. Survey work and other items necessary during escrow have been performed
either by City staff or private companies under the direction of City staff. These services and
the $10,000 in closing costs will be paid for directly out of the existing CIP project, GG-131.
This project is currently titled, Otay Rio Business Park Land. The title was assigned when the
City's corporation yard was expected to be located at the site currently occupied by White
Water Canyon. Staff believes that a more appropriate project name is City Corporation Yard
Construction and suggests that in addition to amending the project by appropriating the
necessary funds for purchase, that the title also be changed.
Existing appropriations of $2,350,000 are available in GG-131 for this purchase. The
remainder, $4,650,000, will be appropriated from both the SCOOT Capital Project Fund
(Transit) and the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund. As was indicated on page 13-11 of the
September 15 agenda statement, Transit will be responsible for funding approximately 30.1 % of
the total project, while Sewer's share is approximately 16.4%. When the project has been
completed and the final costs known, adjustments will be made to ensure that each funding
/~-/
Item
Meeting Date 03/02/99
source has been charged its correct share.
When staff has received estimated construction costs from the consultant designing the
Corporation Yard, we will return with recommendations for financing all or a portion of the
remaining project costs as was outlined in the September 15 agenda statement. When
financing is obtained, the contribution from the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund will likely be
refunded as part of that financing in accordance with Resolution 19170 adopted on September
15,1998.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Total funds required for purchase amount to $7,000,000. GG-131 has $2,350,000 in existing
appropriations available for this purchase. It is necessary to appropriate $1,567,000 from the
available balance in the SCOOT Capital Project Fund (Transit) and $3,083,000 from the
available balance in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund to the Corporation Yard
Construction Project (GG-131), for the purchase of property and existing facilities from SDG&E
Attachment:
. Council Agenda Statement, September 15 1998
File # 0910-30-C
D:\W1NWORDlBUDGET\A113 AMENDING GG-131 TO CORP YARD.doc
JIJ'~ d-
RESOLUTION NO. ) 9 .J JY 3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 98-99 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM BY CHANGING THE TITLE OF
GG-131 TO CITY CORPORATION YARD CONSTRUCTION
AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE AVAILABLE
BALANCES IN THE SCOOT CAPITAL PROJECT FUND
($1,567,000) AND TRUNK SEWER CAPITAL RESERVE
FUND ($3,083,000) TO GG-131 FOR THE PURCHASE
OF PROPERTY AND EXISTING FACILITIES FROM SDG&E
WHEREAS, on September 15,. 1998, by Resolution 19169,
Council approved an agreement with San Diego Gas & Electric Company
for the City's purchase of the South Bay Service Center located at
1800 Maxwell Road; and
WHEREAS, staff indicated they would return to Council for
an appropriation when the escrow costs and other financing
information were known; and
WHEREAS, as escrow is ready to close and funds are
necessary to pay for the South Bay Service Center, staff needs an
appropriation of the necessary funds; and
WHEREAS, it is recommended that the FY 98-99 Capital
Improvement Program be amended by changing the title of GG-131 to
City Corporation Yard Construction and the necessary funds be
appropriated to acquire the project from the available balance in
the SCOOT Capital Project Fund and Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve
Fund.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby amend the FY 98-99 Capital
Improvement Program by changing the title of GG-131 to City
Corporation Yard Construction.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
appropriate $1,567,000 form the available balance in the SCOOT
Capital Project Fund (Transit) and $3,083,000 from the available
balance in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund to the Corporation
Yard Construction Project (GG-131).
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
ttorney
H:\home\attorney\reso\GG131.app
ILfJ-3
COlTNCIL AGEJII"DA STA TEME~"T
It=~
Me.mg Date 9!15'9E
::-:::Tl.L
?=olution {i \ cR
Approving an Agre..'"IIlent with San Diego Gas & Ele..ui~ for
the City's Purchase of the South Bay S~:e Center Lo:ated
at 1800 Maxwell Road and Adopting Negative Declaration
95-02A in Connection Therewith..
R=hnion \C{f?D
Regarding the City's Inrention to Issue Tax Exempt
Obligations to Finance the City's Corporation Yard and
Dire.."ting Staff to Rerum with a Financing Pian.
5DEr"jJTP..-D BY: .tu;sistmt City Manager ~
Assistmt City Al1Drn..~
R....~ BY: City Manag~ ~:::..------ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No-1
In D=ber 1991 me City Council adopted.a Civic Center Master Plan that identified future
sp=: and facility 11eerls to m:=tthe~ated growth in Chula Vista. The Master Pian included
p1>mnin~ for a Il.-"'W Public Works Corporation Yard (Corp Yard) to berelocared from its ==
6 a::re/261,360 sgnare foot io:arion at 707 up' Street to a new site. The new site would b=
=odate the space proje=tions n....nl"i! for staff and equipment to meet the growth anticipated
in the City's eas=territory. A revised Corp YardMaster Plan was completed in February 1998
in response to lI!I oppornmiry to purchase lI!I existing fat:ili1y that could p()t,.",;~lly meet me
majority of me Cny's Corp Yard needs and at me same time save the City millions of dollars,
This agenda S1'It'"TTl":T11 outlin::s the requirements of me updated Corp Yard Master Pian and the
proposed purt:iJase of me San Diego Gas & Ele..'1Iic (SDG&E) South Bay Service Center (SBSe),
a Slli-p1us fa...'i1ity not =enI:iy used by the utility company, to meet the Master Plan ne--...Qs
id..'"IItified for the Corp Yard;
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the proposed resolutions:
1) Author'.zing me purchase of the SDG&E SBSC for a purchase price not to exceed
$7 million plus escrow :f= and due diIig= costs estim~TI"i! in an.amOUIl! not to exceed
$55,000, and authorize me Mayor to execute said agreement.
2) Expressing the City's int..."'lltion to issue tax exempt obligations to finance the City's
Corporation Yard and dire.."Iing staff to return with a recommended financing plan.
3) Approving a negative declaration regarding CEQA findings related to the purchase,
improvement and operation of me South Bay Service Center.
Further. it is recommended that staff be directed to remrn to me City Council with a report and
recommendations regarding me disposition of the existing Corporation Yard site including the
evaination of options for its development as a profit center for the City or for its sale and
redeveiopment of the site.
D~o...l ".f 7
~. /0--(
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
:2.~.CKGRG7':."0:
in 19% s-..af[ D::ame aW2:'e thaI the SouIb Bay S::rvi~ Center, OV,'Ded by SDG&.E. was
"n';'"T-uriliz~;; 2Il.:5 ::ocid JKl=i"liy m=t the City's furure corporation yard n-ds ala subS'.an~
savings to me = id...'"Dlifi::G by the Corp Yard M= Plan.
1n a process 1hal began in Jnn: 1996, staffbegan an exr...'"I!ded series of dis::ussions with SDG&E
regarding me possible pur::has:: of SDG&E's South Bay S::rvice Center lo::atecl at 1800 Ma..":Well
Road. At that tim::, SDG&E was evaluating possible options for imerna1 use and/or the sale!]ease
of the site. In Au,,"llSt 1996, staff received authorization from the City Council to pursue more
formal discussions with SDG&E for the purchase of the SBSe. The proc.."'Ss iY-..::ame an eXL.."I!ded
one due 10 collaI..-.aJ discussions on the SDG&E franchise agr=em and divestimre agr=em,
will::b indire...-tiy a.<fe...-red the conclusion of this deal.
Public: Works Corporation Yard Descrintion
Tn:: City's existing Corporation Yard was constructed in the mid 1960' s and is loca1ed at 707 ~F'
Street (see }.=~'hme:nf 1 -lo::ator map). The site includes 6 useable acres and approxima1ely
30 OOOsauaref::=tofbmlrl~ SDacefor office commnn;""tions m~;ntf':TI~n""and ttansita.."1ivities
' ... ..., "
as well as vehicle storage. In addition, the site contains fueling facilities for gas and diesel
veiJicles. CullijJl ~ed Nanrral Gas (CNG) facilties do not exist.
lllthough this site had metthe needs of.the City fonnany years, the Montgomery annexation, the
growth .of the Transit Division and the bus fleet 10 accommoclau: new TOmes and the need to
provide service 10 D..'"W development has strained this site's abiliry to adequately meet staff and
~WpJ..Ucnt reqnirements.
Solrth Bav Service Center SIte Descrintion
Tne proposed site is located at 1800 Maxwell Road, in the southeast portion of the City off Cnay
Valley Road (see l0::ar.0r map'Anacbment 2), It is comprised of approximately 25 gross acres of
whi::h approxima1ely 15.27 are useable.. .Tne balance of the site is made up of slopes, open space
and ]~nrt~ing.
Existing facilities include:
Office Space:
Warehouse Facility:
Service Fa..'"ility (Garage)
TOTAL
31,037 square feet
14,188 square feet
8.649 square feet
53,874 square feet
Underground fueling faciliti::s for gas and diesel also exist. No CNG facilities are in place.
l>Jthough eXtensive tenant improvements will be required 10 accommoclau: the specific: needs of
the City and its crews, the evaluation of this site as compared to the new facility identified in the
Corporation Yani Master Plan showed a significant cost benefit to the City.
SDG&E esrim~t,." having a basis cost of :::
rep1a=:m cost of :!:: $9.2 million.
'P~"~"nf7 ~
$13 million in the property 'with an estimated
----
/ f) -=5
Corooration Yard Master Plan Reauirements
TD~ revised Co?Jration Yard Master Plan ouilin~s tru: ioliowing :-~=~:
Acreage: 18.96 acres (825,931 square feet). Tnis a..'Teage anri::ipares the buildout of th~
Otay RJm::h, the relocation of the animal shelU:r to a separate fa...'ility and a separate faciliTy
to meet Police needs. In the original iacility proje...'1:ions, th~ Dray Ranch had not b=
planned for and the animal shelt::r and some police needs wer~ anticipated at the new CO!Jl
Yard sit:.
In addition, space needs for all public works' t=ds were reviewed and updated 10 b=
refle::t =::n1 and proja::ted n-.ds. For various public works' a..'1ivities, the buildou:
space proje::tions in tru: 1998 study are below the levels proje::t::d in 1991, despite the
addition of Otay Ran::h.. In general, the Il"OpN"l'l space fore::asts reflect in::reases in the
volume or conlraCt work as well as more efficie:nt operating prot:edures in the City's Stores
division.
In anticipation orthe possibll: purchase of1he SDG&E site the following activities took place:
o Th:: City's Construction and lL-pair Division prepared a =eds and cost assesSlIL..'"Ill
or the improv"",,,,",,, n=ssarylO meet the City's Corp Yard needs, as idemi:fied
by the Master Plan, at the SDG&E site. Space and cost estimates were revised 10
refle::t the 1998 update or the Master Plan.
-.
o A comparative analy.sis of:ltD SDG&Einon SDG&E option was evaiuat.ed.
In COntlnr-rinE the analysis staff included, among others, the following assumptions:
o Tn~ SDG&E site is approximately 5 acres smaller than total a..'Teage needs
identified in ~e Master Plan and the pur::hase or additional property would
ultimately be required 10 meet the Corp Yard needs at buildout. (In developing the
finan...'"ing requir=ents and cost analysis for buildom of the Corp Yard, acquisition
or up 10 an additionall 0 acres was included.)
o The City would achieve c::rtain efficiencies and gain substatnial construction
savings through the purchase of an existing :fa:ility as compared to property
acquisition and new coIlS1Illction. These savings were proje::ted to be $5.5
mi1Iion.
Q Under the SDG&E site alt::rnative, substantial savings (approximately S4.9
mi1Iion) would arise from reductions in the project's financing costs, attributable
both to lower overall project costs and lower costs during the initial coIlS1Illction
phase.
o The SDG&E site will generate additional savings by enabling the City to transfer
se1e::ted activities from the Civic Cent::r to the existing office space at the SDG&E
facility. By reducing the amount of new space which has to be built at the Civic
Center, a net savings of approximately $2.0 million was proje...'"ted. City functions
that are anticipated 10 be re10::ated 10 the new Corp Yard :fa:ility indude, but aT:
~ H , _~ _ -\ '3::5 / c/ - t
'.
:!:,t ;;mite~ 10: Engineering COnstru::tiOD and lnspxtion, ~ Space and some
3uiiding lnspe::tors.
S:zff CODc1ud~ !i:at the cost of the SDG&.E sit::, in;:Juding the purchase of all additional 5 a=es.
Te:;uhs in n:=t savings to tb:: City of appro:r.irn=ly S12.4 million over the cost of consrmc...ing a
Il-"'W flI...'iIiry. Th: result of this a::qnisitiOD is a savings to both ~ City amI ~ PFDIF.
Acmrisition Costs and Fmanrin.. .
Anachm::m 3 is a bTeakdOwn of costs asso:iaI::d with the propos::d purchase, sit:: improv==,
fuJan..."ing, s-.afflmanagem...'"1l1 costs and comingen::i::s. These COsts are summarized below fOT
Coll1l...'i]'s information.
-:- Tn:: total proje.:::t cost, including :finan..'ing, is projected to be $24,738,504. Of this
total, sy,032,636 are esrimllt"'ll firnm"," rela1ed cxp::nses.
-:- Tn:: site acqnisiIion amI improvem::ms are broK...'"Il into two phases. Phase I
($22,855,270) includes site acqnisiIion ($7,000,000), site improv,,","'lI!S
($4,319,801- see Breakdown ofP1anned SDGE Sit:: Improvem..."'IIIS - A="mn.-m
4), up to 10 acre additional prop::rty acquisition ($1,%0,200), d..-signlproje.:::t
manag=em/staff and contingency costs ($997,558) amI start-up equipmem
($1,741,290)' and interest ($6,836,421).
<& Excluding :finan..'ing expenses, the City is responsible for 51.5 % of the principal
proje.:::t cost. The PFDIF is respDIIS101e for the r,,",~ining 48.5%. The PFDIF
p::rc:enrage reflects the ratio of Il-"'W equivalent dwelling units (ED Us) to citywide
EDUs projected at buildout. This ratio is the agreed upon methodology used to
allocated PFDIF and City cost shares on various joint-benefit projects. However,
of the total proje.:::t cost in:ludin!! iinancing ($24,738,504), only $10,267,342
(41.5%) is allo::ated to the City and $14,471,162 (58.5%) is allo::ated to the
PFDIF. The' lower City perremage reflects tb:: assumption thaI a signifi:am
portion of the City's obligation will be paid from existing fund balances and not
financed (Transit's share2). As such, while the City's share of the project's
principal costs is 51.5%, its share of the interest expense is only 26.6%, thereby
reducing its overall project share to 41.5 %.
-:. The City obligation will be shared appropriately among various restricted funds
and the City's General Fund. .tIS shown in Attacbment 3, the total general fund
obligation is esrim~tM at $699,884.
.:. v,'hile this option results in significant savings, the City r=ives less value by
acc.."Pting a pre-existing facility. To correct for the lost "building life, ~ City
lThis generally includes shop/garage-relateditcns such as new baysllifts, shop equipment,
and fuel/wash station equipment.
'Transit is paying its share of the acquisition cost from existing fund balances, Transit's
obligation equals approximately 30 % of the total cost for phase I, or approximately $4.9 million
and $322,000 for phase IT, or a total obligation of appro"::~y $5.; ;illion. / tJ .- ?
d::ve1opers hzve agreed to pay a "building depreciation offset" to:aling $8J4,8XJ.
T'cis cost has zirea.:iy been fa:tored into the PFDIF/Ciry shares.
:-i.'\.A...'NCING \:J'SDS 0.53?lJRCHA.S=:
his Slllffs inl.."'lI1 to finance the proposed acquisition using the DIF, General Fund and restri::ted
funds for debt s::rvice pay=ms. This Illtionale isba>ed on the fact that (1) insufficientDIF funds
exist to pay =h. (2) other significant proje..'"t5 such as the "nrrn"l shelter and the new poii::e
fa...'ility are co~ for use of the same dollars and (3) the City is currenlJy able to borrow
IlI!lll..."'Y at a ch= 1'1Ire than i: earns on investment.
Tn:: purchase ::0=::1. is contingent upon the City obtaining llCC..'1'table financing. A related it..'"lIl
OJ: tonight' s ag:-=n~2 se:l:s approval for a Financial Advisory Form to assist the City in determiT1iT1~
the best alt...'"TIIative to finan...eing this and other major proje..'"t5.
SUMMARY OF TERMs AND CONDmONS
Tn:: following 0IItiines the m;;jor deal poinl:s related to the purchase of the South Bay Service
Cemer:
1) Purchase Price:
Seven Million Dollan; ($7,000,000) payable in cash at close of escrow.
,-
2) PrtlTJerTV DescnTJticm
Approximately 25 a..."TeS of improved real property loc:ated at 1800 Mllxwell Road in the
City of Chu1a Vista including a 31,037 square foot office building, a 14,188 square foot
warehouse, an 8,649 square foot service facility/garage and a parking lot and related
improv==s,
3) Escrow: Due Dilipence:
City has 90 days to inspect the condition of the property, and to process any necessary
emitl== n==}' for project development. The City may extend this period for an
additional 30 days if i: is pro=ding diligently.
4) Initial Droosir: LiauUiaIed Damapes:
City must d::posit $50,000 to open escrow. This amount is refundable if City does not
acquire the property for any reason other than a Ciry default. If City defaults and fails to
acquire the property, SDG&E retains the $50,000 as liquidated damages.
5) ContiiriOl'oS 10 Close:
Conditions to close include:
a)
b)
City inspecrion and approval of the condition of the property,
City determination of proj= f-...asibility, ~ / IJ ~ 6
c) C'tiy approval of the terms for financing the acquisition anD developmeDl of the
?~oj~ and
d) S)G&E's ob:aining final California Pubiic Utilities G:lmmissioD (CPUC) ap:lrDvaJ
.. .
8: toe transr=.
A complete copy of the for:rnaJ purchase agreem...'"ll1 cont.;n;ng the above terms, and other stan:iard
t:rms and conditions, is ..m.~hAJ1 hereto as Anacbm...'"ll15. The agre:::ment was jointly prepared by
SDG&E stJlff and the City Anorney's office and has already b= approved by SDG&E. A copy
of the City's app;aisal on this property is available in the City Manager's office should Council
"i>JJ to review it
1& USE OF TEE EXISTING CORPORA.TION YARD
A mnnber of opUD1!S exist for the future of the existing corporation yard. The obvious is the sale
of the sire as = land in order to take advanlage of the upswing in the economy. Based on
comparable land sales: this ccm1d result in an influx of revenue to the City of $2.2 - $2.8 million.
(Tnis repres::ms gross revenue. This net,gain would have to exclude the City's cost to clean-up
th:: sire.)
However, stJlff is recomm::nliing that other options, including public/private partnerships for the
d...--velopm..'"ll1 of the siI::, be evaluated to det...'"IlI!in:: their long term impact on revenues to the City.
Sraff is aware thar the University of California syst.."'IIl has tak..<>n advantage of this option for many
y= creating an ongoing revenue srream to offset their operating costs. Stllff recommends thar
s:aff evaluate this and other options that could be of benefit to the City and r::turn to the City
Cmm...'"il with a report and recommendations.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Staff conrlnr:t...n an Initial Smdy (Attachment 6) for the proposed acquisition in a=rdance with
the requirem::ms of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQ A). The finri;n~s of the Initial
Smd)' were thar the City's ~ition and operation of the SDG&E facility as the City's new
Corporation Yard would not have an~ si~;ficant adverse impacts on the environmeDl and
therefore, a Negative Declaration was prepared and circulated for public review, No public
comm..."II!S were r=ived as a result of that notification. The Initial Smd)' and Negative
D::claration are attached.
FUTURE ACTIONS:
S:aff will be rerurning in the near future with financing recommendations and a report and
''''-UllllllendatiD1!S regarding consultant and archit=uraI services for the pl.nn;ne and design of
the n...-w Corp Yard space to better meet SJaffing and equipment needs.
FlSClIl IMPACT:
The esrim.t"lJ cost breakdown is outlined in A = r:bment 3. T otaI purchase costs are $24,738,504
including site acquisition/improvements, additional land purchase, staff/m.n'gement, stan up
coS'.s and financing charges. Of that amount, the City is responsible for 41.5 % of the total or
$10.267,342. The DIP is responsible for 58.5%, or $14,471,162. (Because Transit's share will
be paid from existing fund balances and not financed, the City's share of interest (26.6 %) is
~ '3 CD. //fJ~ '1
significantly lower than it's share of the principal (51.5 %), thereby reducing its overall proje:::
share 10 41.5 %. If the entire project cost was finan::ed, the City"s share wowd b:: 51.5%.)
l ne purchase of me existing sit: as compared to the COnsrru::tiOD of a new 7d...'"ility results ill
:pTmn~d savings to the City of $12.4 million.
Tn: City may r=Ive additional expenditure offsets as a result of the sale or red..'"Velopmem of the
existing corponl!ion yard tbrongh a public private partn..'"Tsbip. Commnnity D::ve1opment 5'.k"1
estimates tha1 comparable land sales range from $8.50 - $11.00 per square foot if the property
were sold, or approximately $2.2 - $2.8 million, If the property is d...'"VeIoped as a "profit c:...'"Ilter
TO: !he Cit}., potem:i.aIJy grcar::r r::venues cowd be r"" li7~.d over the long term.
T~ total General?tmd Impa:::. is proj:.:ted a1 $699,884 tentatively 10 be spread over 20 years.
Sufficient funds have already b= appropria1ed in the CIP (GG-131) to cover the initial d...jJosit
of $105,000.
}. =-nmems:
R=imion
Approving an A~~ w:ilh San Di..oogo Gas & Ei=ic iar Ih= Cily's Pcrchase of li1:o
SDlIlh Bay S::rvice C= Lo::au:d m 1800 Maxwell Road, Adopting Negative Decll=ion
95-02A ill Conn=ion Tn...-rewi!b and Appropriating Funds Th=far
R=imion
Regarding Ih= City's im::nrion to Issue Tax Exempt ObJigaIioIlE to Finm= the City's
Cotpo!21ion Yard
).mt~t 1:
Lo= M2p - CorpoI2Iion Yard m 707 "F" Street
p.~-mn-nt 2:
Lo= M2p. South Bay S::rvice C= a11800 Maxwell Road
j. =-hm-ort 3:
At:lJllisiIion and Fin=,.;"g Cosu;
A~~t4:
Breakdown of Planned SDGE Sire Improvements
A"'::1-iTTn-nr 5:
Pur-..hase Agr=::m w:ilh SDG&E
Art?-:mn~t 6:
Negative Declaration and iniIi21 Study - 1800 Maxwell Road, Case No. IS-95-02A
(81J4/98)
'~."
~. /1/;--/0
I~J -
/.
-BflO,A,Ow,.. Y-
:
'!
h~:--J~ r.:,.. ~
f~'I. \V~
, ",'1
Q o:-Q ~;J~
r~~ ;; o;'.v!~~f
....u ,,~ ... ~.t(r.
!.o.I...:::~..~...I~ ~. I~
"'t "' --l""<~
I! "'~U"'I"'"
)~,l G',;"
----- \.::J::l,- l!f
'''c
".
"
I
,
.l
--
o
i
.- .
2~~
u
r;-,,,
\::V...
'\'
",'
.
, ~
- ---'
,
}.. ; I
.r\~i I
" 10.!;JJd "
, ~ ~
~j
-. k.l<
.. ,.........,
::!'?
",-
1:1",
I",
~~
,,'"
:'1",
"I",
"''''
rJ'- "
(;j\"
\::)"
co
-'
:FF~' _ trio ~
\
~!
! ::.- tJ
I. G~~
I! to .,,'
~~ I h to:
- Q.'" C
."'Z.;-c~~
, ~
, .
. ~ i-
.
: --
--...-
PM Z7 ..-- '---J
-D~;'-""" ~'f:Q f'
~I ~'V.:t
r---:-l, . .
~
I '"0, (5)
i'MO_i' .v u !
:; :'~ cJ,,-l ;
~. 0' ., ~
.,.. /.. ~ ..... ~
li
/:;'
0-
.,
I I
I", .
/; !~:~ ~
'%:i' "
_ a. ll.
=----~_.
,
.
.,.
'yV:JOOLAWN
.:01JL G). : 0...'1Jj
'~'L "r--~
ij r,~'"':_
,~ ....... )-..,;. .'~i.
L +,
: ----"r: -. -,_.
~"" ~~.". .1_-',_;.r:ol' t
'OJ'
tJoI' .~
,,~ .
- .::j,
0"
--'~
I. _~
,. ._.'~
~.... ..:
~
ll.
,
.f
.. .. .. ;i
..
I...
~
<.>...<
'&1~o
~-.[;'~ ;g ~.
~ i3' a;., ~
J~C/) ~~.
-
, '"
CO ,
.?
,
~' .
--
.~.;.c..
.-
~,
. ~~
o'
on -:.
'''7 ~-.l 'z~r""""" _.':1 0 "it,~.
~ POR. PAR. I! SeE. MAP B63-37-BE
S. D & A E.--
:.
.,
~
1"'C:..~. . . . J
~
,
""".r;1r.7.$"I-_.r~..1
~-
~l
i;
...
.
-.;
..
..
L- _
..
I
~D
! I
~'" '"
~
.'
~'"
\90
..,
o'
o
(f)
)~';;;s "
~ I
- - --
u -,
"'@}::
C"L ...
r::::-..~
.: ~.,
. '"
..,'
~
.-..- ....
. ,
r.:
(;0:..' '"
I\.!:.I,~ l.c.J
rv -1,
~ ~-' .
C .T:l:...J.(t"
~5:2
_.r
$ rv-
. Q:- -.;~ f.....
.... D~-..J ~
.;: ,,,:::, I")
-'" <u
5
,
".
~.D"-/I1I':Jd~J~~ @ @
. to "-
.. " ' " .
a; - l
....~D ~....).
<:
o
;::
-<r"
i Q:,
: 0 I
, Q .
-"CC
o
u li
"<
~CD ..::....
~Oll...
vi c;
(j)!
rv
to'
W:/I~~ -~ ~s
~
t
-
.
:~ D.,
@~
~ '"
'"
,:>'
'"
'" k.
:;[ l.
tl. ......,..
r -..
.
.
.
(j)
....
.J
e'
".
_.~
.t
'1
.-
~,
",.~ 'J
_..
",- - t
~
r'
I !~. r
~" r ,-(
-I . ~'1.
t =Yj\l
'I I..:V lZ>
~i i~i
!U'":......
.~ .
@
@
.",./
~ .:~.
:~..
., ..":
~./E.
a
Q:
y
rJ
'.
".
/
'.
'-..
"-
,
. /
(/
:.:>
co
f
"-
..,
,
':>'"
.....Ie
.co
"'11.
~....
.~
"'.
01",
0.'"
'"
;)
"
1 .
.. :. ~
.. r'
~,..
.L.
(-
o
r-
i
I-V
~
~
-.~
"!I I
. ~
U')
.;~
/'
I
.- .~
I
--
1
. '.
, tIl
<II
. I
....
..,
I
...,
.'"
'"
Q.
~
L.)L
/
'" M~
.... 0,.'
~ -?' -'-RY. -
~ P~R. ~R,:5 S~MAP .B7~-37.-~1>..
-
...
. t . _ _ _ ....
ATTACHMENT 1
o
<='
'"
'.' ;;- ;c;f:f'~IJ;,:~..
~~,.:-...- -~
--<;f":F~.:::""
.... ~_..; '_'_.."t",.. i
~ ""'.
. .;;~;: ~~~~.- -
,.....-~ ,"~...-",;;. .
~~l:-tl~ .'~
L
i
~
fj.-
,-J>-':
'-
~
"~,
,
~h.
'.
.:.\
;..
,
:
-~
',(C-
Corporation Yard
Cost Breakdown
Phase I
SDGE Site A=quisition: . $ 7,000,000
SDGE Site improv="'l!ts: $ 4,319,801
Sexton Site:Acquisition/Improvemems . $ 1,960,200
Des:ignlProje::t Managem..'"lllIStaff Services $ 303,989
Contingency $ 693.569
Total: $14,277,559
Start-up Equipment 1 $ 1-741290
$16,018,849
P -'nSllION " FINANCING COSTS.
A I I ACHMENT 3
--
PhaseD
$ 0
$ 795,875
$ 749,025
$ 92,694
$ 245.640
$1,8&3,234
$ 0
$1,883,234
Total
$16,160,793
$ 1.741290
$17,902,083
NOTE: It's 2SS11IDed that all sorvice related expenses (e.g. design, project management, etc) an:
paid directly. All remaining expenses are 2SS11IDed to be financed, unless otherwise noted.
Funding Breakdown
PFDIF (.485) Phase I Phase II Total
Principal $ 7,769,142 $ 913,368 $ 8,682,510
Interest $ 4.973.852 $ 0 $ 4.973.852
Subtotal: S12,742,994 $ 913,368 $13,656,362
Site D_l',;;;...--iation Creciit $ 434288 $ 380.512 $ 814.800
Total: 513,177,282 5 1,293,880 514,471.162 r
CITY (.515)
Principal $ 8,249,707 S 969,866 S 9,219,573
lxn=st $ 1.862.569 2 $ 0 $ 1,862.569
Subtotal: 510,1ll,276 S 969,866 $11,082.I42
Site Dep1-~--iation Credit 3 ($ 434288) ($ 380.512) ($ 814.800)
Total: $ 9,677,988 $ 589,354 510,267,342
PROJECT
Principal 516,018,849 $ 1,883,234 $17,902,083
Interest $ 6.836.421 $ 0 $ 6.836.421
Total: $22,855,270 $ 1,883,234 $24,738,504
The City share is broken down by fund on the following page
I Generally inclnd::s shoplgarage-relaled it=s, including buslcar wash equipmCll1 These required items
were originally id:mified in the 1991 Master Plan S1Ildy. Staff willneed to revieW the ilcms to insure their
applicability.
: 20ycar bond@5.43'%. Assmn", that Transitsbare of project is fimdcd directly from Transit fund
Ml::mM"""l:
J Represems aPFDIF paymCll1to compc:usaIC1he Cilyforthe "Iostvalucft associated with a pre-cxisting
fa..-iIity (SDGE) versus a new f&:iIity,
. -.
~ jlJ---/;J
Fnndlng BreakdoWD-Cit). Share
CITY (.515) Phase 1 PhaseD T O:al
Transit (Prin..'"ipaI) 5: 4,906,7234 5: 566,853 5: 5,473,576
Tr.msi1 (Int...~) ~ 0 $ 0 $ 0
Subtotal: 5: 4,906,723 $ 566,853 $ 5,473,576
Site D_.!'>_--illliOD Credit $ 0 ($ 245.255) ($ 245.255)
Total: $ 4,906,723 $ 321,598 $ 5,228321
,
Sewer (Principal) $ 2,428,627" $ 303.201 $ 2,731,828
Sewer r.tnt:=t) $ 1,554.475 $ 0 $ 1,554.475
Subtotal: $ 3,983,102 $ 303')01 5: 4,286,303
Site Depre---illlion Credit $ 0 ($ 131.183) ($ 131.183)
Total: 5: 3,983,102 $ 172,018 5: 4,155,120
Parking M= (Principal) $ 108,6546 $ 9,416 S; 118,070
Parking M= (Inte1-..st) 5: 70,021 $ 0 5: 70,021
Subtotal: $ 178,675 5: 9,416 5: 188,091
Site D_.!'u",-iariOD Credit 5: o ($ 4,074) ($ 4.074)
,- Total: S; 178,675 $ 5,342 5: 184,017
General Fund (Principal) 5: 805,703 $ 90,396 5: 896,099
Site Depr-_--illliOD Credit ($ 434.288) $ 0 ($ 434.288)
$ 371,415 7 $ 90,396 $ 461,811
General Fund (Interest) $ 238.D73 $ 0 S; 238.D73
Total: $ 609,488 S; 90,396 S; 699,884
. Transit's share is 30.1% ofsit: acquisitionfllDprtlvcment costs';' $609,178 of the stan-up equipment
, Sewer's share is ] 6.1 % of sit: acquisition/Improvement costs .;. SO 129,940 of the stan-up equipment
, Parking Meter's share is 0.5% of site acquisitionflmprovcment costs .;. $37.266 of the stan-up equipment
, Assumes that Gen=! Fund portion of the site depreciation credit is used to offset its PiI= J costs.
~ J/J~Jj
.L.Ti kCHM:'~;I. ..~
BT"..ai:ri~'WIl of Planned SDGE Sj~ lmprovem:=nts
Public Warks Shop Areas:
Sewer M"im""'lm,,* S 24,200
Stree: ivf"int""lm-.e $ 121,000
Tnffiic Signals $ 338,305
Traffic Signs/Striping 5: 194,700
Building Services $ 513,645
Co=unications $ 200,640
Park MainL'"llJlIl::e S 1 n,150
Soil Test Lab $ 12,1 DO
P.arl:ing Met..'"I'S $ 58.080
$1,579,820
Garage Expansion
Ops Building
Automatic Wash Sta1ion
Fuel Sta1ion
Office .I;r-..a R::rnodel
Miscellaneous lmprovements J
$1,579,E20
$1,052,415
$ 600,450
$ 150,000
$ 475,361
$ 349,155
$ ] 12.600
$4,319,801
: Includes fencing, phone syst= moclificaIious, restriping, etc.
--
\ ~ ~ "':2/
r
/tJ--/S-
~,
R:SDLVTIDN ND. I q /70
RESOLUTIDN DF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VlST A R..Q;1o.RDING ITS' n\lTENTlDN TD ISSUE TAX EXEIIIIPT
OBUGATlDNS TO FlNANC: THE CI1Y'S CORPDRATION'YARD
AND DIRECTING STAFF TD tk"'TURN WITH A RNANCING PLAN
WHEREAS, '!he City Council of the City of Chula ('!he "'ssuer"') desires to finance
the costs of a~g certain pubfic fa::iflties and improvements, as provided in Exhibit A at".acned
hereto and in::o::>or.ned herein {'!he "?roject"!; and
W,-tREAS, '!he Issuer intends to finance '!he acquisition of '!he Project or pon:i:ms
:f. '!he Project with '!he pro::ee:ls of the sale of obfigations 1he interest upon which is excluded trom
9= income tor federal income tax purposes (the "Obfigations"); . and .
Wrl3'IEAS, priortcthe issuance of the Dbligations 1he Issuer desires 'to incur cenain
. expenlfltllres with respect tD the f>roje::t irom available' monies of 1he Issuer whi::h expenditures
are desired tD be reimbu=:! by 1he Issuer from a portion' of 1he proceeds of '!he sale of '!he
Oiliigatioos.
.'. ~.-.~-~ -.
~.:.r \_
NDW, THERErORE, THE CITY CDUNClL OF THE ClTYOFCHULA VISTA ODES
H5'l3Y RESDLVE. DRDER AND D~J~HI\IIINE AS FOll.OWS:
~0
s:-cnON 1. The Issuer hereby states its intention and reasonably expe= to
reimburse ?roje::t costs incurred prior tD 1he issuance of 1he Obfigations with proceeds of '!he
Ohiigations. Exhibit A db... ii.es either 1he general character,' Type, purpose, and function of '!he
?roject, Dr '!he fund Dr a=um from which ?roject costs are tD be paid and '!he general functional
pUTpose of the fund or a=unt.
- -: ...-
55...'1101\1 2. Tne reasonably expe..'"ted maximum principal amount of the
Dblgations is $11 .20D,DOD. Tne total ?roject cost is estimated to be approximately $23 million,
in::iuding approximately $6:& .miliion in financing costs (interest and fees).
>c_.
55...'IIDN 3. This resolul:ion is being adopted on Dr prior to the date (the
"i:xpenditures Date Dr Dates") '!hat '!he Issuer will expend monies for1he pon:ion of '!he Project cots
'to be reimbursed from pror:e-..tis of '!he Dbligations.
5=cT10N 4. Except as described below, the expected date of issue of the
Diliigatioos will be within eighteen months of the later of the Expenditure Date Dr Dates and the
c~ the ?roje::t is placed in service; provided, the reimbursement may not be made more than
tn~ years atter the original expenditure is paid. For Obligations subject to the small issuer
e=ption of 5e::t:ion 14B(f){4)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code, the "eighteen-month limit" of the
previous semen::e is changed to "three years" and the limitation of the previous sentence
beginning with . ;provided,..... is not applicable.
'-:-,' j
~
S=CTIDN 5. Proceeds of the Obligations to be used to reimburse for Project costs
are not expected to be used, within one year of reimbursement. directly or indirectly to pay debt
service with respect to any obligation (other than to pay current debt service coming due within
the next su::::eeding one year period on any tax-exempt obligation of 1he Issuer (other than the
Dbii"ations)) or to be held as a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund with respe::1 to
an obligation of the Issuer or any entity related in any manner to the Issuer, or to reimburse any
eXPenditure that was originally paid with the proceeds of any obligation, or to replace funds that
~
/tJ/l~
a~e O~ will t>e ~se:j in su::h manner.
~
5::CTION 5. Tnis resolution is consistent with the buog=ry and fma"=ia!
=ir::umstan= of the Issuer. as of the date hereof. No monies from sources other tha" the
obligation issue are. or are remoonably e:q>ec:ted 10 be reserved. or otherwise set aside by the
issuer lor any related party] pursuant to their budget ormancial policies with respe=t to the Proje::!
::os'.s on a long-term basis. To the bes't of our I:nowledge. this City Council is not aware of the
previous adoption of official iments by tne Issuer tnat have been made as a matter of course for
. the purpose of reimbursing expenditures and for which tax-exempt obligations have not been
issued. ....,..
S::CTION 7. Tne iimi".ations des::riDe:l in Se::tion 3 and Se::tion 4 do not apply to
:a) ::oS".s of issuance of the Obligations, {b} an amount not in ex..--ess of the lesser of $100,000 or
five per::em (:%) of the proceeds o! the Obligations. or lc} any preliminary expenditures, such as
archite:::tural, engineering, surveying, son testing, and similar costs other!han land acquisition, site
preparation. and similm: costs incident to commencement of construction. not in excess of twenty
percent i20%} of the aggregate issue price of the Obligations that finances the Proje=t for which
~ pr~_~~..were.~curred. .,-:".' '-.-:e _. .......'
SECTION 8. Tnis resolution is adopted as official action of the Issuer in order to
::ompty with Treasury Regulations j '.'50-2 and any other regulations of !he Internal Revenue
Servi...-e relating to !he qualification for reimbursement of Issuer expenditures incurred prior to !he
date of issue of the Obligations, is part of the Issuer's official proceedings, and will be available
for inspe::tion by the general public at !he main administrative office. of the Issuer.
- 0_0
. SECTION 9. - S13ft is further dire...'"ted to return with a detailed financing plan with
r~l""-t to the Obligations and the Project.
r
SECTION 10. All the recitals in this Resolution are true and COITe=t and this City
Council so finds. determines and represents.
, ,
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Sid Morris
Assistant City Manager
r
~ARD.fW~
1l.'IH~:OItIInlJl
J ....., {)
1"!
/0-/7
~"
------..
"':"."
L__:':'~
. . :..~
...;../
EXHIBIT A
DesCRIPTION DF PRO.JECT
7he proposed Corporation Yard project is necessary to provide current and future
administrative office space, equipment and materials storage, public faciii7y
rTlaintenance facilities, vehicle storage and maintenance facilities, public trar:sit
support facilities and related facilities to serve the Chula Vista community. ,;Je
current faciii7y on 707 F Street has been determined to be inadequate.
The proposed project site, with an estimated acquisition cost of $7,000,ODD,
consists of approximately 25 acres of improved property located at 1 800 Maxwell
Road in the City of Chula Vista. Existing improvements include a 31,037 square
foot office buiiding, a 14,188 square fDot warehouse, an 8,649 square foot service
facility garage and a parking lot and related facilities.
Significant renovations and improvements will be required to complete the project.
Final faciii7y design and corresponding construction costs have not been
determined. Tne facility is expected to be planned for the Chula Vista population
at "build-outW which is estimated to be 277,000 by the year 2030.
The maximum estimated total cost of such facility is expected not-to-exceed $23
million. Approximately $6.9 miliion of that is expected to e financing cas-oS.
.l1.pproximately $4.9 million shall be funded out of capital existing in the Ci:y's
7 ransit Fund account. Approximately $ 1 1.2 million of that amount is estimated
to be the maximum amount to be financed with tax exempt debt.
~a.,- ~
/tf}r/r
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / /
Meeting Date: 03/02/99
ITEM TITLE:
Report: Authorizing Issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) for
Lease of excess Property on the Animal Shelter Site
Chief of Police fJ;; ~C\}.
City Manage~ ~ ~\
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No 10
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The City Council approved a contract with a consulting architect for design of a new
animal shelter in south Chula Vista on October 6, 1998. Design of the new facility,
located at the Beyer Way and Fourth Avenue, is nearing completion and construction is
expected to begin later this year. The shelter, kennels and related parking and service
areas will occupy approximately 70% of the 2.84 acre site. The remainder of the site
will remain vacant until it is needed for expansion of facilities, The Council is requested
to authorize the issuance of a Request for Proposals (RFP) to determine if there are any
businesses willing to lease, develop and operate compatible uses on the excess portion
of the site until it is needed for expansion.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council accept the report and authorize staff to issue
a RFP to determine interest in leasing, developing and operating compatible businesses
on the excess portion of the animal shelter site on an interim basis,
BOARDSICOMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable,
DISCUSSION:
The animal shelter site includes 2,84 acres of vacant land just south of Main Street and
bordered by Beyer Way and Fourth Avenue (site map attached), This area contains
mixed land uses of varying quality, age and character and is expected to continue to
upgrade as Main Street is improved, One of the primary reasons for locating the animal
shelter here was to stimulate improvement of the area,
The proposed animal shelter, including offices, kennels, catteries, treatment areas,
parking and service areas will use approximately 86,000 square feet of the 123,710
square foot site. The remainder of the site will eventually be used for expansion of the
shelter if and when warranted by population growth and increase in the number of
contract cities using our animal control services. However, the facility planned for
construction later this year is expected to accommodate the City's needs for at least the
next decade,
/ / ~/
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date: 03/02/99
Consequently, the shelter site has almost one acre of land which will be unused or
underutilized for some time. It may be possible for the City to capitalize on the excess
site area by determining if there are any compatible businesses or services interested in
leasing, improving and using this property on an interim basis thereby providing an
income stream for the City.
In addition, staff is also discussing the possibility of a land swap of the triangular portion
of the site with the abutting property owner (liquor store fronting on Main Street) which
may result in enlargement of the animal shelter site and consolidation of the corner
parcel for commercial redevelopment which appears to be its highest and best use.
This area lies within the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area and fronts on both
Main Street and Beyer Way,
Staff has prepared a RFP, attached to this report, which will be sent out to related
businesses and services including veterinary clinics, pet stores, animal boarding,
training, etc.., to determine interest in using the site which may include the construction
of permanent or temporary structures and reconfiguration of the current site plan, It
should be noted that veterinarian services will be required to offer low cost spaying and
neutering services to the public,
The current site layout may not be conducive to attracting commercial users who
require high visibility and easy access since the vacant portion of the site will not have
direct frontage on Beyer Way or Fourth Ave. Parking areas currently abut Beyer Way
and kennels are planned along Fourth Avenue. However, since the shelter is not under
construction yet, it may be possible to adjust the location parking areas and/or kennels if
warranted by attractive proposals. Any adjustment to plans as currently developed will
be at the sole discretion of the City. It should be noted that many destination land uses
(in this case, businesses that clients specifically seek out such as an animal hospital) do
not necessarily require frontage or high visibility.
Staff recommends that the Council authorize the RFP as a means of determining
whether a market for this property exists. Proposals received will be reviewed by staff
and the best proposals presented to the Council for further consideration, If it is
determined that any of the projects has merit, the Council may enter into a six months
semi-exclusive negotiating agreement with the respondent for the purpose of
negotiating lease and development terms.
FISCAL IMPACT:
It is recommended that that the Council authorize the RFP to determine interest in the
interim lease of the animal shelter expansion site. Development of this area may
include the improvement and use of vacant land, the development of structures by the
user or the City, or the use of temporary structures on the site, City revenues from such
activity will be dependent upon development requirements, lease terms, conditions and
longevity of any proposal. It is anticipated that proposals will vary greatly which should
provide a range of choices for the Council. In terms of estimating minimum revenue
/j -Z
Page 3, Item _
Meeting Date: 03/02/99
from lease of the vacant land at current rates in the area (approximately $.60 to
$.80/square foot), the City could receive up to $34,OOO/year.
Relocation and expansion of the animal shelter is a project covered under the City's
Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (PFDIF) Program. In the current PFDIF
update, staff has been reviewing all projects with a committee of City developers and a
representative of the Building Industry Association (BIA). With regard to the animal
shelter project, it has been agreed that the PFDIF will pay the full cost of acquiring the
site ($670,000). Thus, any other permanent use of the property which cannot be
justified under the PDIF contribution formula may trigger reimbursement to the PFDIF
for the portion of the site so used,
Attachment A - Locator Map
Attachment B - RFP
{J:lust\adminlscsla 113sldogpond.doc]
)/--3
ATTACHMENT A
\
- - - -- - -------------_...--1___________ __
WJN .. \ STREET
--i-------=------=-----=-----F-.--h\ \ \----------t
! I \ \ \ \\ j
· IlK' ~ \, \ \ i
t, ~ L_ \JfI/', \ \., "
Potential Land Swap Area ~ n '\
! 130&.10-. "\1 \ \ ~.._.J
I 1 \ \\ \ \
I I ..._..~, '1ft. \
In_~_____..","""" ,=====-\ \ \~ '-
: I \\\\\
I I' \ \ \ \
t \ \ \ \
I ...~- i \ \ \ \ '\
' Animal Shelter Site \' \
i III.iI j \ ~ '\
.
.
___ I '\
' __,..._ lIB : \ \
j ----~ ._-. I, I
.- n__~___ -~---I-~_ --:~~f::~,_, jJ;' I /'
------- ------~'fH ...~...,.......~ '.....;
--...;;.,,~_ .t"
- --.... '1 I
ANIMAL SHELTER SITE
Location: 110/130 Beyer Way / J - 1/
Area: 2.B4 Acres I
ATTACHMENT B
Request for Proposals
tor the
Lease of City owned land or buildings
Adjacent to the Chula Vista Animal Shelter
110-130 Beyer Way/1771 Fourth Avenue
City of Chula Vista
Police Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 9191 0
[619] 691 -5230
FAX [619] 691 - 5281
//~5
Introduction
The City of Chula Vista has recently purchased a 2,84 acre site in the southern
section of the City at the intersection of Fourth Avenue and Beyer Way for the
purpose of developing a new animal shelter (see location map).
The shelter will include approximately 14,500 square feet of buildings which will
house administrative offices, catteries, dog kennels, receiving areas, medical areas,
kitchens, euthanasia and disposal areas, and pUblic areas, This facility will be "state
of the art" and have the capacity to serve a population base of over 300,000 which
will includes the City of Chula Vista and several "contract" cities as well.
The proposed animal shelter, including parking and service areas, will occupy
approximately two acres, or 70% of the site and will open by the end of 1999, The
remaining area. comprising approximately 37,000 square feet, is ultimately planned
for future expansion. It is the intention of the City to lease this area in the interim for
related commercial uses which may benefit from proximity to the animal shelter.
Such uses would include veterinary clinics, animal hostels, animal training centers,
etc..,The interim period of availability is negotiable, but is anticipated to be at least
ten years,
The City is therefore requesting proposals for the lease, development and use of the
excess site area for related business activity. These uses may be commercial, for
profit enterprises such as veterinary clinics, animal boarding facilities, pet stores,
animal training. etc. They may include the improvement and use of vacant land,
development of structures or buildings for lease by the City, or the placement of
temporary structures in the site.
Site Characteristics and Entitlements
Location:
11 0/130 Beyer Way and adjacent Vacant properly at 1 771
Fourth Avenue,
Parcel Nos, 629-060-7400/629-060-5400/629-060-5500
Total Area:
2.84 acres
Available Area:
37,000+/- square feet of vacant land. This area, identified on
the site map, is divided into two areas, However, it may be
possible to reconfigure this area by adjusting the location of
kennels and/or parking on the site.
J/---?
Frontage
And VISibility:
Accessibility:
Parking:
Zoning:
Character
Of the Area:
Proposal Criteria
Minimally. 150 feet along Beyer Way and 90 feet along Fourth
Avenue, Frontage may be increased to potentially 300 feet
along Beyer Way and 150 feet to the rear of the parking area
along Fourth Avenue. Any development along Beyer Way in the
vicinity of Main Street will be visible from Main Street,
The site is currently planned to be accessible from Fourth Avenue
only, However, it may be possible to provide driveway access
from Beyer Way,
There are currently 24 parking spaces planned for the site to
serve the animal shelter. Any additional land uses on this site
may require the provision of additional parking depending upon
the requirements of the City's Zoning Code and the extent to
which existing parking may be .shared." The responsibility for
providing additional parking, if required, will.be the subject to
negotiations between the developer .and the City,
I - L, limited Industrial. A listing of allowed landuses in this zone is
attached,
The Animal Shelter site is located along the southern border of the
City of Chula Vista, just south of Main Street and north of the Otay
River, Main Street is a busy commercial thoroughfare which
connects to both I - 5 and I - 805, Since the site is approximately
equi-distant from both of these freeways ( less than two miles in
either direction), it is easily accessible from south San Diego
County and Tijuana, Landuses in the area are mixed in terms of
quality. character and age, The City will be making major
improvements to Main Street over the next several years and it is
anticipated that major new commercial and industrial
developments will follow,
Description of Project:
Respondents are requested to provide a full description of their proposal including,
but not limited to the following:
/J ~?
. Description of the type and nature of the proposed business including a
description of business activities. hours of operation, relationship to the animal
shelter and number of jobs provided. Veterinarian services will be required to
offer low cost spaying and neutering services to the public.
. Preliminary lease terms and requirements.
. Description of physical requirements of fhe proposal including preliminary site
plan, spatial needs. structures required. parking, and access,
. Identification and experience of the proposed operators of the business,
Including resumes and statements of previous experience.
. A completed City of Chula Vista Disclosure Statement (attached).
In addition. finalists in the selection process will be required to provide evidence of
financial ability to undertake the project,
Selection Process and Submission Deadline
Proposal should be submitted, no later than 5:00 p,m, on Friday, April 30, 1999 to:
Captain Leonard Miranda
Chula Vista Police Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA. 91910
Tel. 619-691-5230
All proposals submitted will be reviewed by City staff for completeness and clarity,
Additional Information may be requested from respondents in order to better clarify
and evaluate proposals,
Cify staff will identify finalists who may be invited to provide more in-depth
information concerning their proposals, Final selection will be made by the City
Council.
The successful respondents will have the right to enter into a semi-exclusive
negotiation agreement with the City for a period up to six months for the purpose of
negotiating final development and lease terms which will be subject to approval by
the City Council.
II ~y
The City of Chula Vista reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted,
No representation is made herein that any contract will be awarded pursuant to the
request for proposals, or otherwise. All cost incurred in the preparation of the
proposals, in submission of additional information, travel expenses and/or in any
other aspect of the Request of Proposals prior to the award of a written contract will
be borne by the respondent. The City will provide only staff assistance and
documentation specifically referred to herein and will not be responsible for any cost
or obligation of any kind which may be incurred by the respondent. All items
submitted to the City in response to this Request of Proposals shall become the
property of the City of Chula Vista, Final plans and specifications will remain the
property of the City of Chula Vista and the City maintains the right to use same and
or modify same to construct future facilities,
J/ /1
REGIONAL MAP
~
,
...ro--_-
--
-&; _ L
Diego :" \
'.,=,~ \
..... -..;;:.~ I(
._,/'\\, \/
~. \. ~c;-,.
.. -._' -. ;'r.~;~ % ~...
'_ t..-' 'C. '; '\ '".'
.~" . 0- e.
.~ \. '" c/"'"
-:-; ::: National \~ _ ~i - ~,
12 City ~~ljnC:OI" -;::P- _
~ \;.r.~ ._--
~ ~ :""'...-n
-; :....:~__, Bonru
\~~ ....
, _-' ~ lvnWDod
/' ,~ ""-l:.-."~ Hills
, .~ ~
. ~"'-' _/,- '\,- -_.
\. ..Chula ~ -) /'./ ~-" ;~
\~. Vista /~.. .; ._.-z.,~ __'
\..,.~ "\'\.
t- H.rtrof ~.-.. \,
\\1 S'do~. \ \\\
,l'a<__ \ c..stI. !!
II .. P.rt ~!: 'i
'Ii --::h:: -:-" II !
P.'m \~~=."'- ,~~~
~City \....... ~n If
'''-'\" -- -- "-;., I
- c-\ \ \ ~S.f
-.. ~0' f ~.~-
,;I' .!
-~-~~!~: ~~." -..-..-:.-
- -" " --..--..
~ ----:--- 'I--"~"
.-"-- ,'-
,,"-", .....---~ .
---~ ..--....- -.-..' -' ~.~
-"~'.-----:I:'~ . ~...
/ ,-- Tft..... ~.".
-----. Tijuana 0'
.'
----
~.'\
,---_. ~
~.r.d,~ . '-..,
HillS
.- .o:.~
..~
.~-
.-
:'ock.
Grove
---
X::::::::.-
. 9 (
// ~/tJ
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION
c 1997
Pacific Sell Directory
::rr .. c..1IIla
lJIllW sanm PI.JECT
u.s..a
110/130 Bever Way & Adiacem .Prop.
PllCS.IIIS.I25-fH-7C11/I2!-fU..W1/125-..WSII
t: ~ ~. f f ~:~-~. + r ~..- ; i. f i. i-l~~
i I ;1 i [ .r< , LI :". I.=~
-
.-
,i..~;
r"
l
r
f
.~\
---; '. \
\ J' ,I -.\
\, !' ; .' , Am .
l,.,,,, i ; "WEST- \SAlIS : I
., '. , . ! \..... I \~ ' ~ I
,- r.- ._1 ..__.'~""~! \ I :
'. .' d~"" .,,- .. -..... - S; C '! . ,,' . (,
1~~~=-~~7~~:..:~~~-::~~~i~~~~~~_.; \_ ~-=~: .~_::;- ~.~ 7 ~.~:~~~~:~~!
t--"" -- ~ - ~- ~."';'~~=;Imali'. . "."... ",," ",'. - ,. . .~t..."._-"
~~:~~~~~~-'- .~ .~._._;: :i~~~~c~;~-~t~:-~~~~i;g.~J-::::.::~:?f~t~:j
~'_~_'''_~T'''''''''''--=':::~'",,,,,,,,,,,,~~,~~~~_",_,,~,~"~_,,,~,_,_,,,,_ '. -...j;; '._'
.~lliJ~~~~li~3E.1~sc~:;;;:
- - ~ ~_ ;l~':)j.~__,J;. -.-_ - -~'":-~~.~ '-'_'_OC' -~_.--:"",,-'--~-~-.'--I
. -.... '-. . - -. .. ;'~1jli~i~~~~~?~!
.. -"~';;.:,=""'-~"'.0~'~"=~~-'=";;1
. . --~_..... .!::::;:r:_--:'::" '._:,:.;a~";:~j
r.j '['
r I
., /: r
:.. I
I.;. ~
~ _ .r
, ,
I
i, r .~~:. ~
~ r' j.. r;'~ -I
j . -.'
, I: i ~ '
l r.;~ Y. .;,: L",.-t"c_1L L ::L. -"..-...lr'_:'.
" ~ t- f.. - ...:.=,..i--_',,::C.'~''''F 1'_ ._~~'-
~:-. S', r. r. t .f.,:.;::?:"::.~:.;!~.S~ ~I: r- ~t::.........J
!".
I
.1
[
r
;
t
.
L
.
,
,.
Ii
1":
'1'.
i :
. ,
"
fl' .
, .
Ii
r'
,
i'
r
,
I
!
I
:1
:1
.
I
I
I
.,/J
.f I '"
.,.. r
'j: :'r :.:
-r:" r r .
-r"
/>.
c-
I .
......1.
r-.- r-
,
,
i' I
'I'i
I _ I"
,..
It .
-, ,
:/':'---:'
;./; ;
I
I
1
I
~.
,
Ka.If
LOCATION
SIZE
I 101130 Beye: Way & Adjace:lt Vac2.!!!
?~ope~' at 1771 rou:-..h ..i.ve:lUe
A = 0.27 ac:es:3 = 1,.17 ac:es/C = L 10 ac:es
2.84 ac:es total
,
".
) / -//
/
,
-=~----. / ,I
----------~(IV~ - ,
~ /
--', /
.-.~
Alternative Sites
Available for Lease
d /
JJ
, ;
I,
! .
,
!
,
I
I
. I
I
Y
. [
,
,
,
L_
,
I I
~ I, I;',' (,
I ! 1"""" I \i II
~~II,II
~...L ~_______
II"II'~~~
' " :;; ',/ ,
r :'I::?to.:d' . J' r ,J
. ! (_ I'
,
~.
.
,
\
\ \'
)
\
\ \\,
\\
\ \
\, \.
\
\
\
)
Ii>
, ,
: i
\,
,
,
'.
'\
\
,
\
"
\
\
, .
\:-
\>
\
\
,
,
,
1/
,
I
I
"
--------------.
I ______--.....
I --..........
I
I
SITE PLAN
ANIMAL SHEL TER
CHULA Yl9T A CALIFORNIA
CHt.ILA YlST A. Rc:HITECT8
RYAN A
,JACKION " ARCHITECTS
ER1C DAVY" 7 '198
O!:CDlII! .
/ / ~/2-
'~~'O'
~O 1S
\J.../
60'
r
-
II
.,
.
.
I
.
~
I
I
Chapt~ 19.44
I-L - I..lMI1ED INDUSIlUAL ZONE
Sections:
19.44.010 Purpo~.
19.44.020 Pmnined uses,
19.44.030 hc=ry uses and buildings.
19.44.040 Conditional uses.
19.44.050 Prolnbited uses and processes,
19.44.060 Sign regulations.
19.44.070 Height regulations.
19.44.080 Area, lot cov<:rag~ and y.ud requir==.
19,44.090 Pmormanc~ standards.
19.44.100 Fuel restrictions.
19,44.110 Setbaclcs from rcidential or agricultural zon~Loading facilities.
19.44.120 Landscaping.
19.44.130 Sit~ plan and architectural approval,
19.44.140 Off.street parlcing and loading faciliti",.
19.44.150 Outdoor stora~.
19.44.160 Trash storag~ areas,
19.44,170 Enclosures ~uired for all uses-Exc~ptions.
19.44.180 Wall requirement3.
19.44.010 Purpo~.
Tne purpose of the I.L zone is to ~ncourage sound limjt~d industrial development by providing and
protecting an environmem free from nuisances created by som~ industrial uses and to insur~ th~ puriry of
the tOtal environmem of Chula Vista and San Di~go Counry and to protect nearby resjd~nt:ial, commercial
and industrial uses from any hazards or nuisances. (Ord. 1281 ~1 (parr), 1970; Ord, 1212 ~1 (pan),
1969; prior code ~33.513(A)).
19.44.020 Pmnitted uses,
Permitted USes in an J.L zone are as follows:
A Manufacturing, printing, assembling, proc~ssing, repairing, bOnling, or packaging of products from
pr~viously pr~pared mat~rials, not including any prohibit~d Use in this zon~;
B, Manufacturing of ~Iecrrical and ~I~crronic insrruments, devices and components;
C. Wholesale businesses, storage and warehousing;
D. Laboratories: r~search, ~xperirnenral, mm, el~crronic and testing;
E, Truck, rrailer, mobile hom~, boat and fann implement sal~s ~stablishments;
F, Public and private building mat~rial sales yards, service yards, storag~ yards, and ~quipmem remal;
G. Minor auto repair;
) ) -'J:;
L. Animal hospi~als and veterinarians, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.050;
H. Laundries, laundry service, dyeing and cleaning plants, except large scale operations;
1. Car washing establishments s.,bject to the provisions of Section 19.58.060;
J, Plumbing and heating shops;
K. Exterminating services;
N. Electrical substations and gas regulator stations, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.140;
J
-
.
M. The manufacture of food products, drugs, pharmaceuticals and the like, excluding those in Section
19.44.050 of this chapter;
O. Tempora."} I:'act signs, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.320 and Section 19.60.470;*
.
? Any other limited manufactured use which is determined by the commission to be of the same general
character 25 the above uses;
Q. Agricul=al uses as provided in Section 19.16.030.
I
(Oed. 1356 91 (pa.-r) , 1971; Ord. 126191 (pan), 1970i Ord. 1212 91 (part), 1969; prior code 933.513(B)).
J
19.44.030 Ac.cessory uses and buildings.
Accessory uses permined in an I.L zone include:
.1
A. Adminisrrative, executive and financial offices a."ld incidental services, such as restaurants to serve
employees, when conducted on the premises;
I
B. Other accessory uses a.'ld buildings customarily appurtenant to a permined use;
I
C. Retail sales of products produced and manufactured on the site;
D. Caretaker house.
I
E. Satellite dish antenna are permined in accordance with the provisions of Section 19,22.030F.1.9 11
through 13.
I
(Ord 2160 91 (part), 1986; Ord 2108 91 (part), 1985; Ord, 1281 91 (part), 1970; Ord. 1212 91 (part),
,969; prior code 933.513(C)).
I
'Editors note: This section amended to conform with provisions of Ord. 1575, 1974.
(
19.44.o.w Conditional uses.
Conditional uses permined in an I.L zone include:
A
Machine shop and sheet metal shoPi
/ / ~):I
.\
.-'
~
B. S~rvic~ stations, subj~ct to th~ conditions in S~cti 'n 19.58,280;
C. Steel fabrication;
D. R~staurants, d~licat~ss~ns and similar us~s;
E. Driv~-in th~at~rs, subj~ct to th~ conditions of S~ction 19.58.120;
F, Major auto repair, ~ngin~ rebuilding and paint shops;
G. Commercial parking lots and garag~s;
H. Plastic and other synth~tics manufacturing;
I. Building h~ights oxc~eding thre~ and one-half stori~s or forty-five feet;
J. Unclassified uses as set forth in Chapter 19.54;
K. Trucki.'lg yards, terminals and distributing operations;
L. Th~ retail sale of such bulky items as furniture, ca.l'ets and other sim~ar items;
M, Retau distribution centers and manufacturers' outlets which require extensive floor areas for the
storage and display of merchandise, and the high.volur:le, warehouse-type sale of goods and, retau
uses which are related to and supportive of existing, on-site retau distribution centers of,
manufacturers' outlets. Conditional use pennit applications for the establishment of retail commercial
uses, covered by the provisions of this subsection, shal! be considered by the city council subsequent
to its receipt of recommendations thereon from the planning commission.
N. Roof-mounted satellite dishes subject to the standards set forth in Section 19.30,040.
O. Recychng collection centers, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340.
P. Hazardous waste facilities, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.178.
(Ord. 2542 s4, 1993; Ord. 2252 s10, 1988; Ord, 2233 s10, 1987; Ord. 2160 sl (pan), 1986; Ord. 2108 sl
(pan), 1985; Ord. 2031 sl (pan), 1983; Ord. 1927 sl, 1980; Ord. 1698 sl (pan), 1976; Ord. 1356 sl
(pan), 1971; Ord. 1281 sl (pan), 1970; Ord. 1212 S1 (pan), 1969; prior code s33.513(D)),
19.+4.050 Prolubited = and processes.
Prohibited uses in an J.L zone include:
A Manufacturing uses and processes involving the primaI}' production of products from raw materials,
including the following materials and uses:
1.
Asphalt, cement, charcoal and fuel briquenes,
2.
Rubber, chemical and allied products, and soap and detergents,
3.
Coal, coke and tar products, the manufacturing of ~xplosives, fertilizers, gelatin, animal glue and
siz~.
)/ //~
See Sectiol".s 19.60.020 and 19.60.030 for permit requirement and approval procedure.
4. Turpen:i.'le, matches, paint and other combustible materials,
5. Stockyards, slaughterhouses and rendering plants,
6. The storage of fireworks or expJosives,
7. Indust:'ial metal, waste rag, glass or paper salvage operations and slag piJes,
8. Fish, sauerkraut, vinegar and similar uses,
9. Brev.ing or distilling of liquors or perfume manufacturing;
B. lne followi.lg processes: Nitrating of corron or other materials; foundries; reduction, refining,
smelting, allo)ing, rolling, drawing and extrUding of metal or metal ores; reflning of petroleum
products; dis:illation of wood or bones; storage, curing or tanning of raw, green or salted hides or
skins; and ..ain milling;
C. AI"')' other ,"se which is determined by the commission to be of the general character as the above uses.
(O:d. 1281 ~1 (pa::) , 1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (pan), 1969; prior code ~33.S13(E)).
19.44.060 Sign regulations.
Types of signs allowed: Business (wall and/or marquee and a freestanding sign) subject to the
following:
I
1. Wall and/or marquee: Each business shall be allowed a combined sign area of one square foot
per lineal foot of building frontage facing a dedicated street or alJey; however, the sign area may
be increased to a maximum of three square feet per lineal foot of building frontage provided that
the sign does not exceed flfty percent of the background area on which the sign is applied as set
forth in Section 19.60.250.
I
I
Each business shall also be allowed signs facing on-site parking areas for flve cars or more and
walkways ten feet or more in width. Such signs shall be allowed an area of one square foot per
lineal foot of building frontage facing said area; however, the area may be increased to two
square feet per lineal foot of building frontage provided that the sign does not exceed fifty
percent of the background area on which the sign is applied as set forth in Section 19.60.250.
The maximum sign area shall not exceed one hundred square feet:
I
I
2. Freestanding (pole): Each Jot shall be allowed one freestanding sign subject to the following:
I
a.
Signs are restricted to those lots having a minimum frontage of one hundred feet on a
dedicated street. In the case of corner lots only one frontage shall be counted,
I
b.
The sign may contain one square foot of area for each lineal foot of street frontage but
shall not exceed one hundred fifty square feet. In the case of comer lots or through lots,
only the frontage the sign is oriented to shalJ be counted toward the allowable sign area,
d.
Minimum ground clearance, eight feet,
) / ~/ t
I
-I
c.
Maximum height, thirty-five feet,
,
e. The sign shall not be pennined to projeCt inro the public right-of.way,
L The sigl' shall maimain a twenry.foot setback from all imerior propeny lines,
g. Freestanding pole signs less than eight feet in height are restricted to a maximum sign
area of twelve square feet and shall mainrain a minimum setback of five feet from all
So-eets,
h. Only the name of the complex and four tenanr signs, or a total of five tenanr signs may
be displayed on the sign. Where the pole sign is used to identify the name of the complex
or the major tenam, the sign shall be designed to identify all proposed tenants up to the
maximum number allowed herein. The minimum sign area allocated for each tenanr shall
be not less than ten square feet;
3. Ground [monument): A low-profile ground sign may be used in lieu of a freestanding pole sign.
The sign shall be subject to the following:
a.
Maximum height, eight feet,
b.
Maximum sign area, fift)' square feet,
c.
The sign shall maintain a minimum setback of five feet froD all streets and ten feet from
all ime,io, p,openy lines,
~
_.
The sign st;Uctu,e shall be designed to be architecrucally compatible with the main
building and constructed with the same or similar materials. Where the pole sign is used
to idemify the name of the complex or the major tenant, the sign shall be designed to
identify a!J proposed tenams up to the maximum number allowed herein. The minimum
sign area allocated for each tenanr shall be not less than ten square feer.
B. Othe, SIgnS: See Chapter 19.60 for window (Section 19.60.270); canopy [Section 19.60.280):
temporary construction (Section 19.60.290); public and quasi-public [Section 19.60.310) i drive.in
theater marquee [Section 19.60.320); directional (Section 19.60.340); warning and instructional
(Section 19.60.350); se:vice station price signs [Section 19.60.360); directory (Section 19.60.370); real
estate (Section 19.60.380); unclassified uses [Section 19,60.400); signs on mansard roofs [Section
19.60.410); signs on pitched roofs (Section 19.60.420); business (Section 19.60.430); and signs on
architecrural appendages [Section 19.60.440);
1. Signs on screening walls or fences: In lieu of a freestanding sign, a sign may be applied to a wall
or fence used for screening of parking areas. The sign shall be subject to the following:
a. The sign may only denote the name of the principal business or the name of the
commercial complex,
b. Maximuf:1 sign area, rwenry.five square feer.
c. Other regulations: ,AJI signs are subject to the regulations of Sections 19.60.040 through 19.60.130
and the standards of Sections ]9.60.140 through 19.60.2]0.
D. Nonconforming signs: See Sections 19.60.090 through 19.60.120.
) / -/?
1223
[R 12/91)
La. Area
(Sq.FI.)
10,000
Lot
Coverage
(Max.%)
50
Buildings
Signs
Front
20'
o
Enerior
Side Yard
15'
o
Side
0"
Rear
0"
I
I
.'
I
E. The design re';iew comminee may reduce sign areas below those authorized above based on the sign
guidelines ane criteria contained in the design manual.
(Ord. 2309A ~12, 1989; Ord. 1575 ~1 (part), 1974; Ord. 1356 ~1 (part), 1971; Ord. 1281 ~1 (part),
1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (part), 1969; prior code 933.513(F)),
19.44.070 Height regulations.
1'0 building or slrucrure shall exceed three and one.half stories or forry.five feet except that any
building or structure erected to such a height or less that would be detrimental, in the opinion of the
cOfi1:r.ission, ro the light, air or privacy of any other Slrucrure or use, existing or reasonably to be anticipated,
may be reduced. Exceptions are provided in Section 19.16.040.
(Ord. 135591 (part), 1971; Ord. 1281 91 (part), 1970; Ord. 121291 (pan), 1969; priorcode 933.513(G)).
j 9,44.080 Area, 1<;>t coverage and yard requirements.
lhe followlP.f ",inimum re~:.1lrements shall be observed, except as provided in Sections 19.16.020 ond
] 9: 6.0,,0 through 19.] 6.080 ane where increased for conditional uses:
Setbacks in Feet
. 0' no: less tha.. te,at s?ecifiee a.. the building line map which takes precedence shall be provided and
rr.ol..tained. (See Sections 19.44.090 through 19.44.180 of this chapter for other required setbacks.)
.. except when adjoining an R or A zone, or areas designated for future residential or agricultural
Je':elopment on the Chula Vista general plan, then not less than fifty feel.
(Ore. 135691 (part), 1971; Ord. 128191 (part), 1970; Ord. 121291 (part), 1969; prior code 933.513(H)).
19A4.090 Performance standards,
All uses permined by te:s title shall be subject to initial and continued compliance with the
I"': lormonce srandords in Chapter 19.66. (Ord. 1281 ~ 1 (port), 1970; Ord. 1212 ~ 1 (part), 1969; prior code
~J3 513(1)(1)).
19.11.100 Fuel restrictions.
~1anufacturing and indusr:ial processes in an I.L zone shall use only gas or electricity 2S a fuel;
~ro\'lded however, that oil burning equipment may be installed for standby purposes only. (Ord. 1281 91
(pOO1), 1970i Ord. 121291 (part), 1969; prior code 933.513(1)(2)).
)/-J~
.
.
(R 12/91)
1224
11
19.44.110 Setbacks from residential or agricultural zone.Loading facilities,
In any I.L zone directly across the street from any R or A zone, or areas designated for furure
residential or agriculrural development on the general plan, the Joading facilities and strucrures shall be a
distance of at least thirty feet from said street, (Ord, 1281 ~1 (part), 1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (part). 1969; prior
code ~33.5130)(3)).
19.44.120 Landscaping.
The site shall be landscaped in conformance with the landscaping manual of the city, and approved
by the planning deparunenL (Ord. 1281 ~1 (part), 1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (part), 1969; prior code
933.5130)(4)).
19.44.130 Site plan and architectural approval.
Site plan and architectural approval required for all uses in an ].L zone, as provided in Sections
19.14.420 t:.rough 19.14.L80. (Ord. 1281 91 (parr), 1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (parr), 1969i prior code
1;33.513(1)(5)).
19.44.140 Off-street parking and loading facilities.
Off-street parking and loading facilities are required for all uses in an I-L zone, as provided in Sections
19.62.010 through 19.62.140. (Ord. 1356 ~1 (parr), 1971; Ord. 1281 91 (pan), 1970; Ord. 1212 91 (part),
1969; prior code 933,513(1)(6)).
19.44.150 Outdoor storage.
Outdoor storage and sales yards in an ].L zone sha!I be completely enclosed by solid walls, fences,
buildings, or a combination thereof, not less than six feet in height. No merchandise, materials, equipment
or other goods shall be stored or displayed higher than the enclosing fence. For other fencing requirements,
see Section 19.58.150. (Ord. 1356 91 (part), 1971; Ord. 1281 91 (part), 1970; oid. 1212 91 (part),
1969i prior code 933.513(])(6)).
19,44.160 Trash storage areas.
Trash storage in an I.L zone shall be subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340. (Ord. 1356 91
(parr), 1971; Ord. 1281 1;1 (part), 1970; Ord. 1212 SI (part), 1969; prior code S33.513(1) (7)).
19,44.170 Enclosures required for all uses-Exceptions,
All uses in an I-L zone, except sales yards, service yards, storage yards and loading and equipment
rental, shall be conducted entirely within an enclosed building. (Ord. 1356 SI (part), 1971; Ord. 1281 91
(parr), 1970; Ord, 121291 (part), 1969; prior code 933.513(1)(9)).
J/ ~/I
1225
(R 12/91)
19.44,180 Wall requirements.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I
Zoning walls shall be provided in an I-L zone, subject to rhe conditions of Sections 19.58.150 and
;9.58.360. (Ord. 1356 ~1 (parr), 1971; Ord. 1281 ~1 (parr), 1970; Ord. 1212 ~1 (parr), 1969; prior code
1;33.513(1) (J 0)).
//-02ZJ
I
I
-\
r
[?, 12/9])
1226
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: /2-
Meeting Date: 3/2/99
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: PCM-95-01B - An application to amend the Otay
Ranch SPA One Public Facilities Financing Plan to expedite Olympic
Parkway construction.
Resolution of the City ofChula Vista amending the Otay Ranch
Sectional Planning Area One Public Facilities Finance Plan to change
implementation thresholds for Paseo Ranchero and Olympic Parkway.
-/
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning and ~~~g, (~/;L
REVIEWED BY: CitYManag~~~ (4/5thsVote: Yes_No---1L.)
On June 4, 1996, the Otay Ranch SPA One ~blic Facilities Finance Plan (PFFP) was adopted
by the City Council, along with the SPA One Plan and other documents required for
implementation of the Otay Ranch General Development Plan. The SPA One PFFP established
thresholds for public improvements serving Villages One and Five, where Olympic Parkway is
located. In order to expedite the improvements of Olympic Parkway, a financing plan and
security for construction, along with modifications to the Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU)
thresholds that affect Olympic Parkway, are being proposed by the City, the Otay Ranch Company
and the McMillin Company (the SPA One developers).
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council continue this project to the March 16, 1999 City
Council hearing.
H:\HOME\PLANNING\KIM\REPORTS\PFFP.CC2
/ J.. "i
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item /..J
Meeting Date 3/2/99
Resolution /93151 Appropriating $40,000 from the available
fund balance in the Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund for a minor
sewer replacement project on River Ash Drive in the vicinity of Gold Oak
Court.
SliBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works
REVIEWED BY: City Manag~ 'w ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes X No---1
On May 26, 1998, by Resolution No. 19014~ity ~cil approved the Tentative Subdivision
Map for Chula Vista Tract 98-07, Bella Navona (see Attachment 1). The Final Map, Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement were approved
by Council on October 13, 1998. During construction of the off-site sewer facilities for the
subdivision, it was discovered that a portion of the existing sewer line is not acceptable for future
maintenance purposes and must be replaced. The City's Engineering Division concluded that the
existing sewer line must be corrected to a satisfactory condition in order to prevent any future
maintenance problems.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving a $40,000 appropriation
from the available fund balance in the Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund for a minor sewer
replacement project on River Ash Drive. The appropriated funds are to be placed in the project
account for the City's Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Account No. 226-2260-SW900).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None.
DISCUSSION: The majority of the sewer facilities for the Bella Navona subdivision were
designed to gravity flow west and connect to an existing 8-inch P.V.C. sewer line that was
"stubbed-out" from a manhole located at the River Ash Drive and Gold Oak Court intersection
(see Attachment 2). Out of the 28 single-family residential units created by this subdivision, 23
units will be served by this sewer connection. The existing "stubbed-out" sewer line extended
from the manhole in an easterly direction for approximately 30 feet in length and terminated
roughly at the right-of-way line of River Ash Drive. According to the City of Chula Vista
Drawing Nos. 84-19 and 84-26, the existing sewer line was as-built, as previously described, on
March 6, 1986. Said drawings showed the "stubbed-out" portion of the line as being constructed
as a smooth horizontal curve with a radius of 100 feet to meet the existing sewer and drainage
easement between the residences of 1031 and 1035 River Ash Drive.
Subsequent to the trenching operations for construction of the Bella Navona sewer tie-in, it was
discovered that the "stubbed-out" sewer line did not exist as a large radius horizontal curve, but
was constructed with an abrupt 45-degree bend. This type of sewer line construction is not
currently allowed within the City. The construction ofthe Bella Navona tie-in continued and was
eventually completed with the existing "stubbed-out" sewer line.
/3-/
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 3/2/99
The existing "stubbed-out" sewer line is unsatisfactory to the City due to potential maintenance
and/or flow problems that the angle point may create. With the angle point left in-place, the
potential for the sewer line becoming clogged would increase and would inevitably affect the
upstream facilities and the 23 residential units serviced by it. Special equipment not currently
available to the City would potentially be needed to maintain the sewer line if it was to remain as
is and the need for more frequent maintenance would be required. Staff believes that the ex isting
sewer line angle point needs to be removed and corrected to an acceptable condition. Using the
City's existing power cleaning equipment could cause the sewer line to rupture at the angle point.
After a meeting in November between the City and the developer of the Bella Navona subdivision,
Western Pacific Housing, it was concluded that the developer would provide cost estimates for
correcting the "stubbed-out" portion of the sewer line. The engineer-of-work for the subdivision,
SB&O, Inc., designed three potential alternatives for correcting the sewer line (see Attachments
3,4 and 5) and Basile Construction, Inc., the developer's contractor, submitted cost estimates for
constructing the three alternatives (see Attachments 6, 7 and 8). Alternative No.2 was selected
and recommended for implementation. Unfortunately, due to time conflicts, Basile Construction
will be unable to do the work. It is proposed that the construction of the chosen alternative be
done by the contractor chosen for the Sewer Rehabilitation Project (SW -900) expected to be
awarded in May, 1999. By including this work with SW-900 instead of having the developer's
contractor do the work, staff believes that lower bid costs can be expected. It is staff's opinion
that $40,000 is sufficient funds for the SW-900 additional project contractor to do this work on
River Ash Drive. The difference in construction schedule between the SW-900 contractor and the
developer's contractor is approximately 4 months. City staff does not believe that the 4 month
delay will present any problems. Bella Navona move-ins are expected to start March 5, 1999.
A summary of the three alternatives with 20% contingencies is as follows:
Alternative 1 (see Attachment 3):
Description: Provides for the Bella Navona sewer tie-in to connect to the existing sewer
manhole on River Ash Drive with a large radius horizontal curve.
Basile Construction, Inc. Estimated Cost: $40,419,70 (see Attachment 6)
Comments: The construction of this alternative will still create a bend in the sewer line.
Alternative 2 (see Attachment 4):
Description: Provides for the Bella Navona sewer tie-in to connect to the existing sewer
main on River Ash Drive by a new sewer manhole and removes any angle points from the
line. The existing manhole that connects to the "stubbed-out" sewer line will remain and
the "stubbed-out" line will be removed in its entirety.
Basile Construction, Inc. Estimated Cost: $46,892.54 - (see Attachment 7)
Comments: This alternative removes the bend in the sewer line and is consistent with the
City's current standards for sewer line construction.
))--2.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 3/2/99
Alternative 3 (see Attachment 5):
Description: Provides for a new sewer manhole to be constructed at an offset to the
centerline of River Ash Drive and connect to an existing manhole on said roadway.
Basile Construction, Inc. Estimated Cost: $48,369.23 (see Attachment 8)
Comments: Does not construct the new sewer manhole along the street centerline, which
is not consistent with the City's current standards.
After a review of the three alternatives by the Engineering Division, the second alternative was
chosen as the best solution for correcting the existing sewer line problem. This alternative will
provide for the sewer line construction to be completed in accordance with current City standa rds
and will remove any future maintenance problems from the sewer line.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs ($40,000) for the minor sewer replacement project will be provided
by the appropriated funds from the Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund (Fund No. 226) to be
placed in the project account for the City's Sewer Rehabilitation Project (Account No. 226-2260-
SW900). The normal costs associated with the sewer line maintenance will be provided by the
City. Should the actual bid amount be higher than appropriated funds, staff will request additional
funds when the project is awarded.
Attachments:
Attachment 1: Resolution No. 19014
Attachment 2: Project Location Map
Attachment 3: Alternative No.1
Attachment 4: Alternative NO.2
Attachment 5: Alternative No.3
Attachment 6: Cost Estimate for Alternative No.1
Attachment 7: Cost Estimate for Alternative No.2
Attachment 8: Cost Estimate for Alternative No.3
[FILE NO. 0600-80.BNOOlIj
February 24,1999 (11:18am)
H:\HOME\E~G]NEER\AGENDA IBNSEWER.GET
)3--j
RESOLUTION NO. ~;?j?gv;l
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING $40,000 FROM THE
AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE IN THE SEWERAGE
FACILITIES REPLACEMENT FUND FOR A MINOR SEWER
REPLACEMENT PROJECT ON RIVER ASH DRIVE IN THE
VICINITY OF GOLD OAK COURT
WHEREAS, on May 26, 1998, by Resolution No. 19014, City
Council approved the Tentative Subdivision Map for Chula vista
Tract 98-07, Bella Navona; and
WHEREAS, the Final Map, Subdivision Improvement Agreement
and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement were approved by
Council on October 13, 1998; and
WHEREAS, during construction of the off-site sewer
facilities for the subdivision, it was discovered that a portion of
the existing sewer line is not acceptable for future maintenance
purposes and must be replaced; and
WHEREAS, the city's Engineering Division concluded that
the existing sewer line must be corrected to a satisfactory
condition in order to present any future maintenance problems,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby appropriate $40,000 from the
Sewerage Facilities Replacement Fund (Fund No, 226) to the Sewer
Rehabilitation Project Fund (Account No, 226-2260-SW900) for a
minor sewer replacement project on River Ash Drive in the vicinity
of Gold Oak Court.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
H:\home\attorney\reso\sewer.rep
J3~i
ATTACHMENT 1
=.=SJL!';~iJ!\ r',I.=:,. -: :;~~ L
A R::SOLUTION 0;: TH:: CITY COUNCIL 0;: THE CiTY 0;: CHULA V~O:T!-.
AOO?TING N:::GATIV:: D:::CLARATION AND GRANTING F.??ROVAL:'r
A T::NTATIV:: IVIF.;' TO ALLOW THE SU5DIVISION Of 5.25 '3R:::;:;S
ACR"S INTO 28 SINGL" ;:AMIL Y LOTS RANGING IN SIZ:: ;=Ror~ 5.)):;
TO 8,300 SOUAR:: F::ET ON TH:: SOUTH OF ::AST "J" 5TR::ET
3:: I W::::N RIV::R ASH DRIV:: AND T;-E CURR::I\iT T::Rlv1II\iL!S 0;: \filL:'
OAK ?D,t..:) D~~ 07 ?AS::D LAu::RA.
i. :=.::::1"1 ALS
1-.. ?roje::t Site
WH=r:\::AS. the parcel which is the subject maTIer of this resoiution !$
diagiammati::ally reoresented in Exhibit A attached hereto and in:;orporated herein by
:n~s referen::e. and tor the purpose of general description herein, the ?roje:::'l ::or:s!s:s
o~ 5.25 acres los:ated on the south side of =-85t "J" Street between riiver /...sh Drive
a:l~ i:he current terminus or Wild Oak Road off oi ?2seo Ladei2 ("?roje::t SiTS"); and
Projs::! Appiicant
WH::R::AS, on a duly verified application for a tentative map (?CS 98-07) with
resoect to the Project Site was filed with the city 01 Chula Vis-.c ?Janning Department
by Western Pacific Housing ("'Applicant") on December 18. 199.8; and
C. Project Description: Application for Tentative Map/SPA Amendment
WHER=.t.S, Appiicam requests permission 10 subdivide 5.25 a:::res 1:"1"::0 28 lots
on the Project Site: and
D. Environmental Determination
WHEREAS, in accordance with the requirements of C::QA, the Environmem:.al
Review Coordinator has determined that the Project requires the preparation of an
iniTial Study and a Habitat Conservation ?Ian, such initial study (IS 98-231 W2S
prepared. and based on such study a Mitigated Negative Declaration was preDaTed and
cir::uiated for nublie review; and
Resource Conservation Commission Record on Application
WH:::R=AS. the Resource Conservation Commission considered the Negative
Declaration b2sed on IS 98-23 voted 5-0-0-1 not to recommend adoption of the
Negative Deciaration; and
Planning Commission Record on Application
WH=R=.AS, the Planning Commission held an advertised pubiic hearing on the
Project on May 13, 1998 and voted ~-0-3 adopting Resolution ?C5-98-07 and ?CM
jJ~3
;'\esohnio:1 19014
?age 2
93-33 recomme:loing that til~ City Coun:il adopted Negative Declaration !S~98-23,
a'1d approve tn: tentative map and amendment to the Specific Plan; and
G. City Courdl Record of Applicatio'1
WH::;,\::"-.S. a duly called and nOTiced public hearing on the ProjecT was held
bsfore the Ci7\' :oundl of the City of Chula Vista on rVlay 25, 1998 to re:eive the
;=:ommenOai:I:J~, of the RCC: and Planning Commission, and 10 hear public testimony
\,':;-;::1 regarc :::: ::-!= sam-=:.
II. ?U,NNING CDIJHv'lISSIOr'J CI::CORD
The proceedings and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning
Commission aT ,heir public hearing on this Project held on May 6, 1998 and the
minutes and resolution resulTing therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of
th!S proceeding.
III. COMPLlANC:: WITH C::OA
In accordance with the requirements of C=QA, the City Council hereby adopts
the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on 15-98-23.
IV. T::NTATIV:: SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS:
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act.
the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for
Bella Nevona, Chula Vista Tract 98-07 ;s in conformance with the Ranchero Sectional
?ia:1ning Area ?ian. as amended, and the elements of the City's General Plan. based
0'1 ,he following findings:
1 . Land Use
The Ranchero Sectional Planning Area has an overall holding capacity of 41 5
units. Currently, there are 369 lots created within the EI Rancho Del Rey
Development. As a result, the proposed 28 lots is within the limits of the overall
holding capacity. In addition, the SPA plan is being amended concurrently to allow the
development standards proposed with this Map.
2_ Circulation
All of the on-site streets required to serve the subdivision will be constructed.
The public streets within the Project will be designed in accordance with the City
design standards and/or requirements and provide for vehicular and pedestrian
connections wi,h adjacent streets.
3. Housing
The project is an infill project surrounded by residential development and does
nOT involve any public facilities that would induce any further substantial grown. The
project site does not involve any existing housing that would be displaced. The project
JJ~?-
=.esoiU:I:J:--' ': 3~"1 L
=-age 3
v.'il! provide cdditional hOL:slng Cons!s::en: w!7n i~f.: zoning i3:l.::: ol2veioome:-l: :J37ierns
o~ the neighborhood.
4. Conservation
The developer has prepared a HaD"at Conservation Pian HC?) and has received
aCl incidental ,ake permit from U.s. ~iSCl and Wildliie Servics IUSrWSI pJrsuant to
Section 1 D(a)(i )(3) of the Endangered Species .L.:t of -: 973, as amended (~S_t...). This
:::~rmjt authorizes the take of 1 pair of :ocsl:a! gnatcat:ne;s 1:-; csso:lation W!ih the
;J;oposed sin2ie family residential deveiopment of the pro}e:::: 51i:e.
5. ?arks and Recreation, Open Space
The developer will be required to pay The ?ark Acquisition and Development ~ee
with the ~inal Map approvaL
6. Seismic Safety
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies 01 the
Seismic Element of the General Plan Tor this site. The main lrace of the La Nacion
~arthquake fault. a potentially active fault is }; miles to the west and would nor
directly nor indirectly impact the project siTe. The siTe is not currently wiThin a mapped
Earthquake ~ault Zone.
7. Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agen:ies have reviewed the
proposed subdivision for conformance with City saiety policies and have determined
that the propcsal meets the City Threshold Standards ior emergency servIces.
8. Noise
The project is required to meet existing s,andards for residential development.
All dwelling units must be designed to preclude interior noise levels over 45 d3A and
exterior noise exposure to 65 dBA in accordance wiTh The City's periormance
s-.:andards and the noise level standards of the Uniiorm 3uilding Code.
9. Scenic Highway
The project is not adjacent to scenic highways.
10. 3icycle Routes
No bicycle routes are required with the proposed development. The recently
created parcel map (Tentative Parcel Map 98-05) requires, as a condiTion of approval,
that The developer of said parcel map provide a bikeway on ~ast ,. J" Street along
project frontage.
/3-'}
.:\esoluti:J:'"J ! 9CJi ~
Page 4
11 . ?u::llic Buildin~s
No pubiic buildings are proposed on the project site.
3.
Pu'suant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act. the Council certifies that it
h2S considered the effect of ~h!s approval on the housing needs of the region and has
baianced those needs agair.s: :he public service needs of the residents of the City and
the available f;s:al and envir~:1mental resources.
c_
The configurati~n, orientatio:1 and topograohy of the site partially allows for the
oPtimum sinin2 of lots for :;2ssive or natural heating and cooling opportunities as
reauired by Government Cooe Section 66473.1.
D.
The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal conforms
to all standards established by the Ciry for such projects.
The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately prooortional both in nature and extent to the impact created
by the proposed developmen'i:.
NOW, Ti-ER::r:OR!:, 3:: IT R::SOL V::D the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby approve the Project subject to the general and special conditions set forth
herein.
V. T::NTATlV:: SU3DIVISION MAP CONDiTIONS Or: APPROVAL
Prior to approval of the final map unless otherwise indicated, the developer shall:
STREETS. RIGHTS-OF-WAY, AND PUBLIC IMPROV!:MENTS
1. The following street improvements shall be constructed:
a. Construct ::ast .. J" Street to Class 1/ Collector roadway standards in accordance
with City of Chula Vista Drawing Nos. 94-202 and 94-205,
b. Construe,;: missing off-site street improvements along the full frontage of the
north side of ::ast "J" Street between River Ash Drive and Red Oak Place.
2. Provide a Class III Bikeway within East. J" Street. Normally, Class II/ Bicycle Routes
share the right-most traffic lane with motor vehicles and are posted with "Bike Route"
street signs only.
3. Enter into an agreement with the Otay Water District for water facility improvements
extending to and connecting with the existing water mains within East" J" Street at
the easterly subdivision boundary and at River Ash Drive. Install new domestic water
servi:::=_
4. Design and construct all public improvements in accordance with Chula Vista Design
Standards, Chula Vis;:a Street S;:andards, and ;:he Chu~Yista Subdivision Manual,
/3-15 .
::;,S:S:JI~:j~~, I,~:",~
?e:;2f: '"'
unies.s otherwise approved by the CIty ::ngineer. Submil im;.:no'Jemeni. ~lB::s je:aillilg
hDr~ZDntal and vertical aiignmenl of said public improvemen:s for The rsvis:w and
approval of the City Engineer.
5_ Said public improvements shall include, but are not limited to, asphali. concrete
pavement, cH.!shed aggregate base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk. sewer and
water utilities, drainage fasiiities. street lights and signs. SHeet knucki=s and fire
hydran!s.
Guarantee, pri:x to approval of the rinal !\/iap, "the cons-.:ru::ioniins-;:a!i2:1o;"', 01 al]
improvements within the subdivision (streets, sewer, drainage. utiiities. etc.) deemed
nesessary to provide service to the subject subdivision in accordance with City
scandards.
7.
Submit and ob~ain preliminary approval for proposed street name(s) from ~he Director
of Planning and the City Engineer. Street name(s) shall be subject to approval by the
Planning Commission. Dedicate to public use rights-oi-way for all stree:s shown on
the Tentative Map within the subdivision. Approved street name{s) shall be shown on
the rinal Map.
B.
Relocate the existing street light on East" J" Street near the westerly subdivision
boundary to the north side of East "J" Street at its intersection with the proposed
residential street within the subdivision. Add an additional street light at property line
4/5. All street light locations shall be subject to review and approval by ~he City
Engineer.
,-
9. Construct sidewalks and pedestrian ramps on all walkways to meet or exceed
"Americans with Disabilities Act" standards.
1 O. Prior to approval of the Fmal Map, present written verification to the City Engineer
from Otay Water District that the subdivision will be provided adequate water service
and long term water storage facilities.
11. The proposed residential street within the subdivision which intersects East" J" Street
must meet intersection design sight distance requirements in accordance with City
s~andards.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
12. Submit for approval by the City Engineer, a de~aiied grading plan in accordance with
the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance No. 1797, as amended.
13. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepared as part of the grading
plans.
14. Prior to approval of the grading plan and the issuance of a grading permit, submit a
soils! geologic report for review by the City Engineer.
15. Submit hydrologic and hydraulic studies and calculations, including dry lane
calculations for all public streets. Calculations shall also be provided to demonstrate
)} ~1
~lesolu:;:;-, : 3::) i 4
:;age E
ne adequacy af downstream drainage STructures, pipes and inlets. Private drainage
S\'stems wiThin 1, 2. and 3 shall be designed to convey 1 DO-year design STDrm flDWS
u~jer ooen challnel flow conditions.
16. STDrm drains shall be designed in accDrdance with the SubdivisiDn Manual and Chula
\"s:a Grading Drdinance NO.1 797. as amended.
'; 7. ?~~vi::i= imDfDve: a::::cess :0 all storm drain cleanouts, or 2$ approved tJy ~ne CiTy
=--:21~ee: .
18. Design storm drains and Dther drainage facilities tD include 3est Management Practices
to minimize non-point SDurce pollutiDn tD the satisfaction Df the City E:ngineer.
Su:,sequent Dwners of Lots 1. 2, 3, and 4 shall be infDrmed Df, and provided a CDpy
Df, The Chula Vista Municipal CDde ChapTer 14.20 regarding nDn-storm water discharge
prohibitiDns, including, bUT nDt limiTed to, the discharge Df Dil, pesticides, fertilizers.
he:-tlicides, W2sn waters, and chlorinated swimming pool water.
19. LOT iines shall be IDcated at the tDPS Df slDpes, except as approved by the City
=ngineer. Lots shall be gradedto drain to the street or an approved drainage system.
RUT1:lffl drainage shall not be permitted to flow over slopes.
20. Ten feet-wide private storm drain easements shall be granted on the Final Map fDr the
benefit Df Lots 1, 2, and 3 in cDnfDrmance with the requirements Df Chula Vista
Municipal CDde SectiDn 18.20.150. CDncrete-lined drainage ditches shall nDt be
Cor.srructed over private storm drain pipes.
21. All !;lrading and pad elevatiDns shall be within 2 feet Df the grades and elevatiDns
shawn on the apprDved tentative map or 2S Dtherwise approved by the City E:ngineer
an::! ?Janning Director_
22. Prior tD approval Df Final Map, the develDper shall submit a list of prDposed lots
indicating whether the structure will be IDcated on fill, cut, Dr a transitiDn between the
two situations.
23. The inclinatiDn Df each cut or fill surface resulting in a slDpe shall not be steeper than
2:1 Itwo horizontal to one vertical) except for minor slDpes as herein defined.
All COrlStructed minor slDpes shall be designed fDr prDper stability cDnsidering bDth
geoiDgical and soii prDperties. A minDr slDpe may be constructed nD steeper than one
and Dne-half hDrizontal to Dne vertical (1.5: 1) cDntingent upon:
a. SubmissiDn of repDrts by bDth a soils engineer and a certified engineering
geDIDgist cDntaining the results of surface and subsurface explDration and
analysis. These results shDuld be sufficient fDr the sDils engineer and
engineering geDIDgist tD certify that in their prDfessiDnal DpiniDn, the underlying
bedrDck and sDil SUPPDrting the slDpe have strength characteristics sufficient
10 provide 2 STable slope and will nDt pDse a danger to persDns Dr prDperty, and
b. The insTallatiDn Df an apprDved special slDpe planting prDgram and irrigatiDn
system. / :3 - / tJ
=:,~SOI:.J:i:;:-, ';9~';L.
;:'a9~ 7
~
A "Minor Slope" is defined as a slope four (4) ieet or les5 In venlca: :i;mension
in either cUi or fill. between single family lots and no'!: paralielto arn roadway.
AGREEM=NTS
24. ;:'r:~r 10 approval of lhe Final Iv'iap, the developer shall agree lhallhe Cny me\, vmhhold
:uii::ii:lg permi:s for the subject subdivision if anyone of the i allowing o:::u:-:
hegio7"'lai development threshold limi:s sel oy The :'251 ':n:J;2 V~5i:2
Trans~orlation ?hzsing Plan have been reached.
L. Tranic volumes, levelS of service, public utilities and/or services exceed the
adopted City threshold standards in the then effeclive Growth Managemem
Ordinance.
25. ?rior 10 approval of the Final Map, the developer shall agree 10 comply with that
v8;-sion of the Growth Management Ordinance in efieet at the time a building permit
is !ssued.
?-
_0.
?rior to approval of The rinal Map, the developer shall agree to install fire hydrants as
reoClired by The City Fire Marshall. rurTher, in compliance wiTh Chula VisTa IIflunicipal
Code SeCTion 15.36.030, the developer shall agree to inslall, lest and operate all fire
hydrams prim TO The delivery of any combuslible maTerials.
27. ?rim to approval of The Final Map, the developer shall agree to prepare. submit and
onTain approval by the Drrector of Planning of a construction phesing pian.
28. ?rim to approval of The rinal Map, the developer shall agree 10 comoiy with all
eopiicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
29. ?rior to approval of the Final Map, the developer shall agree to defend, indemnify and
hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees, from any claim, action
or Droceeding against the City, or its agems, officers or employees to anack, set aside,
v~id or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission,
CiTy Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this
subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City
promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on The further
condition that The City fully cooperates in the defense.
30. ?rior to approval of the Final Map, the developer shall agree to hold the City harmless
from any liability for erosion, siltation or increase flow of drainage resulting from this
project.
31. ?rior to approval of the rinal Map. the developer shall agree to ensure that all
franchised cabie television companies {"Cable Company"} are permined equal
ODPOrTunity TO place conduit and provide cable television service to each lot within the
subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television
companies who are, and remain m compliance wfth, all of the terms and conditions 6f
the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other- rules. regulations,
ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operaTion of cabie television
J:J----//
~2SDlu7i:;~ 19:; j L
::-3:Je E
'::::J:71Danies 2$ same may have been, or may from time to time be issued by the Citv
D~ ':huia Vistc.
32. :O,iJ'to app'oval of the i"ina! ''''ap, the developer shall provide se~urity to guarantee the
c:)~slTuctionii~s:aJjation of full public street improvements for =8.S1 "J" Street and the
resdentia! stree: wIthin the subdivision.
OPEN S?:"::E!ASSESSMENTS
~~ :O"J' to apO'J,'a: of the i"i~al Map. agree to an in~rease of assessments Imoosed
p:1:"suant to ;J~s:--, Space u~s-;:rjct No. 10 and agree to complete all requirements of
?ro~osition 21 B =5 it relates to imposing an increase for such assessments.
3L. ?riJr to approval of the i"inal I"'ap, submit all Special Tax and Assessment d;s~losure
Torms for the apmoval of the City ::ngineer.
35. The developer shall be responsible for installation of street trees in accordance with
Se:;;ion 18.23.; 0 of The Chuia Vista MuniCipal Code. The use of cones shall be
in~i"ded where ne~essary to reduce the impact of root systems disruPting adjacent
sidewalks and rig;,:s-of-way.
EASEMENTS
36. Graer.: on the F'inal Map a minimum 20' wide easement to the City of Chula Vista for
CDP-5Iruction and maintenance of sewer and storm drain facilities within Lots 4, 11 &
24.
37. Grant Dn the F'inal Map a 5.5 feet-wide street tree planting and maintenance easement
alan;; all public streets within the subdivision to the City. Said easement shall extend
irom The property Ime and shall contain no slope steeper than 5: 1 (horizontal to vertical
ratiol. unless otherwise shown on the Tentative Map.
MISCELLANEOUS
38. Submit copies of F'inal Maps, improvement plans and grading plans in a digital TDrmat
such as (OXF) graphic file priDr to approval of each i"inal Map. Provide Computer
Aided Design (CAD) copy of The Final Map based on accurate coordinate geDmetry
cal~uiatiDns and submit the information in accordance with the City Guidelines Tor
Digi~ai Submittal in duplicate on 5-1/4" HD or 3-1/2" disks. Submit as-built
improvement and grading plans in digital format. PrDvide security to guarantee the
ultimate subminal of improvements and grading digital files. Update electronic files
afte, any constructiDn pen and ink changes to the grading or improvement plans and
resubmit to the City.
39. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California Coordinate System _ Zone VI
(19831.
40. In order tD provide mDre usable area, the rear yard of Lot 13 shall be increased by up
to eight feet through the use of retaining walls no higher than four feet in height.
I'] -;;L
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
,.-
?esCllu:iG:i ': 3D 'I':'
?a:Je 9
in order tor consistency wr~h the iront yard of Lot 26. and 10 provide more 8~enness
to the cul-de-sac design. the front yard setba::::k for Lot 23 shall tJe thirty ie~: tram the
front prDperty line.
Submit a comprehensive fencing plan to the Planning DeoaTi:ment i or review and
annrDval by the Director of Planning.
Submit a comprehensive sneet tree plan to the Planning Depaii:ment for review and
2:J~roval by the Director of Planning.
Submit to the Director of Planning a copy of the proposed CC & R's fDr the prDject fDr
review and approval by the Direstor of Planning. Said CC & R's shall inslude
a)prDhibitiDn of external television antennas; b) prDhibitiDn against garage conversiDns
and c) require a gate be installed fDr any fence cDnstructed at the top of slope in the
rear of LDts 1-3 in order tD provide access to the rear Df the prDperty.
Obtain for subminal to the City, from all corresponding school districts, a "will serve"
lener or make other arrangements approved by the school districts.
Comply with all mitigation measures as outlined in the mitigation mDnftoring program
issued for Negative Declaration prepared for IS 98-23, insorporated herein by
reference.
47.
Submit site plan and architectural elevations of the prDPosed single family dwelling
units tD the Planning Department fDr review and approval to ensure the product will
cDnform to all the required develDpment standards and be architecturally cDmpatible
with the surrounding develDpment.
48.
Pay applicable park fees per PDD (Park Dedication Ordmansel
49.
The prDperty owner shall nDtify the City at least 60 days priDr to CDnsideration Df the
Final Map by City if Dtfsite right of way cannDt be obtained as required by the
ConditiDns Df Approval. (Only otfsite right of way Dr easemen:s affected by SectiDn
66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act are covered by this cDnditionl.
After said notification, the owner shall:
a. Pay tha full CDSt of acquiring offsfte right of way or easements required by the
CDnditiDns Df ApprDval Df the Tentative Map.
b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said right Df way or
easements. Said estimate to be approved by the City =ngineer.
c. Have all easement and/Dr right of way dDcuments and plats prepared and
appraisals complete which are necessary to commence CDndemnation
proceedings.
d. If the developer so reques:s. the City may use its powers to acquire right Df
way, 52sements Dr licenses needed for off site improvements or work related
J.) -/-;
Resoluil:':""1 j 90i 4
~age 1:
to the tentative ma~. The deveiopers shall pay all costs, both direct and
indirect incurred in said aCQuisitio:1.
T:l=., requiremen:s of a. b a:'1::1 c above s:,alJ be a::::complished prior to approval of the
;::;:1al Map.
kl: Dffsi1e requirements whi:n faJ! under the purview of Se:tJon 65462.5 of the SLate
S~:divisjon MaD kC! will be waived if The City does not comply with the i 20 day time
jj;-:j::.=:tion spe::ified in that se:i:ion of the As!.
CODE REQUIREMENTS TO BE INCLUDED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
Chula Vis;:a Municipal Code requirements to be inCluded as Conditions of Approval:
50. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Preparation of
the ;::inal Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of the
Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision Ordinance and
Subdivision Manual.
51. All utilities serving the subject subdivision and existing utilities located within or
adjacent to the subdivision shall be underground in accordance with City Code
reouirements. rurther, all new utilities serving the subdivision shall be underground
prior to the issuance of Building Permits.
52. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy:
a.
b
c.
d.
<p
The Transportation and Public Faciiities Development Impact Fees.
Signal Participation Fees.
All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection fees.
SR-125 impact fee.
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin cee (Prior to the approval of the Final Map).
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Fee.
53. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal, State, and Local regulations,
including the Clean Water Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing all
required testing and documentation to demonstration said compliance as required by
the City Engineer.
VI. CONS"QUENCE 0;: ;:AILUR" OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to Occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of
all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of
OCcupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and
prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages
for their violation. No vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest
by ths City's approval of thisResolution.
) 3 -)1
VII. lh."....:..._IJiTY; t...~"7".)iJH~...11C ?,:-'J,):t.."7"IC)h'
::':'-:5:' .J::'~ ':.:::'..!.
-2;:1:: -:"J
11 is :ne inlention 01 the ell" c:..oundl tha1 its ad~~ll:J:I 01 tn:s :=;es:JiUi:IOil !S ~e~Bn:Jem
U;,lO:1 the enfor::eabiiny of ea:h and every term, provision and condition nerei;: s~a!ed;
and that in the event thai nay one or more :erms. prov!sio!:s. Dr conol:ia::s are
determined by a CDUn of competenl jurisdiction 10 be invalid. ille9al Of unen~:Jf::eabie,
th~s resolution 5:.a11 be deemed 10 be aUlorr.ati:::ally revok.ed ane o~ nQ tUllher i Dr:::: and
effe:! ab initic;.
?resented :,y
hDorov-20 25 iO fo:-m ~y
;?~/t::L
(J
fl. nn fvl. Kaheny
'....!ty Au-orney
I
(
Robert LeIiei
Planning Liirector
13-/3
=.::s'JI-.;:;:,.-,
. ?
=-2:?e 1_
-1 S:Ji.!.
=x:iibn :-
~..~:
~~;
::u::
::! =:~
:E!
1;:: ;
I''"';
;~ ;, ~~~~~
:!! :::. ! [:~f,,;,;;
"~.,! r.., I
- . ;. -. I: ~ 1~~. "-
; ji" H:1 ;;1 ; ~ ~ ~: ~ L. :;;.:
.. ; r '::':. 'i1;<:1 ~~~tl;;:~., t.
-: - 1 ,Tl.:''':~j if.:~.'. i;.'1.;~~':11 ~1 i.;~::L
. -'...!r:_:.-,'_t~~~1 C:~-.-+l~._ [0...- ....
" ., . ""'1""'", ", _... t~, "" "-" "';:;'
.. , :'11' "1,' ....'I""r. ".' ':;'~"".' :~!!!'
.;. ':'" ":';;1ri ;j;~':::"l::gi~m h;;:_~:~,""
" --;.i -ll'j:I..!!_..:;n.~hrJ:l::rH::~__..._._.... _ _ _ I I /
;;: '::;;;'!"":'::;;;:;;''''!;'::'''''''. "
";;";~'''; ::~~~'--k~>'__I' {11/it----,-
........ I: F:!J....! ~ : I i:'. ,~" I.:<j "i'l it _. ~
~~.- ""', """"" .~'" ,
lG'\.~~"..;; . -""'~I'''''' -" "":r.".~,_
. .' , '. i' ,h, " 'e'---i;~'-'i-O;; 1 /
S,!. \ ~ z";.'::.: L ~ --;3J ~ ;: i: :._ ~ 1.__~I:"j;::! ~ :
-"< , -. "'. 'j", -. ' '. '" . .
-- "",! '.'i' ''', "' '. . '-;7.. ',,,,
" 1 'r-. ---.:~'!" I , .. ". ,"'I-~/IIr,.,..... ~.
E ~ -".. _-j- <: ~/Ii'..Y; \" <
[ ~ Itll,il ~"" . ~ ;" 1ft' I/., fn'Cl,~.. _,_ '"
"- t ..; '1tJJ'':iif-'~' I z.~, 11,0 Vi '~'. ...:.......
y~.....,.< . j - · .~ ../'.... t::"" _, __
~ ... '1' r,., E'.. -- - .::J-r-, ""\' ,
: , ; J . ~- J ~~f 'ift..~. "'- ~$'~:'-.;~', :;, <. J ~ '1
" ~-lf- 'IDJ 1/;; ". j. ~,L
; , 1"[' : t ~~;in;~; , /~5Ir!~~ \~. : I
' " , - "" ',.. '. '~
- . ;; .:d: .' w:.' ._-_.~ :~""~'., \ ~....
g '~.;!-,~ / ~-, "'-"11 ~ '-.\ .~.-;:
.. l - u1' u,m" o~::.' /','
' ~; ~. . ;;fi ;e:;g - ~ :-'!-. ::1~ ;', / ":.:.~I
. -; ; "r-Jl 1....:-1 ~,~, ".~, / . .,
'~I', ; 1:.:" 'R':: 1""/ '- _ ," -~ ''-:'.lI _ /'" !.:. I
- · "'~'. "I' ",v"L _", '_,
'f~ ~ :liiiTlr';';"'Ji&~'1 ~!1~i- ~;~~,~;.;.: '~J-, i
... oJ / '1' /1. ~ . I';;;.;o~1 ..\.\,:...--- "1, ~
~ ',,: . ,,~' !!: ',;-- '-~~'llt''i:., . <, \ 1
.... < . -.!; '- _......_-~-- - ---<II 1 r.'" " ~ I
..'. -. ,'/1 ir "",'::" -.. ..r-~. .:,...1-.-:.... I, 1
" ~~- \. .,.--.... "
~-, ..,,-~ - '..I ~ ,
:--;-, ;.,'),~.'i:<. --. --"--":--..,'. _I
" ,,-:'~ '" r.., ..:'lll,r =---- -r 'r~~ . _. ...;
- -....~. I' J p.. :..- }': ...1
-i ;'~.,.~,~=,,-". ~ :i!i'!1.;~ ii' ~. " :::::' t~"'. i.: .... -,.\ ''---I
',: --. '" , -, " ", "'. '. , 1
.:.... ; ..., ~~6"17 n'f~r : --'-~-~- ...2~ '!,.:.,~"__=-~._I___":::.- _~:-:-::---.. I
-"<:'~'-.' "I -::1 ;
;:' "1 '-~""'T:'!"!',..,. . . ,
'- . ....; '" . , , 'r~,l, ""'~ , i
~'-,... . .5 "'i -:" t"t ''',~ "'I !
.:,. ,: ~.; ;:;j'r.j:!,!;,.! "':~=.. .,
" F f," ,. 1 <. ""c, -"i .""",.< 1
_'J ~ 'l; ,::; ,:...", <,"r.' ", h:'I.::J;u; _ '.
' -- , - " .. ~"'I'"''
'..;. :; ~ . iif_\~
f"'~"_ _
.'----.
~: <1"
'~l
" ; ~:.:...
-j
-:1
~~~ ~:.!
,
';;;
:;H
'.":;, ~;
~~"':r
:7_~
.-;:r'ii
" .
.:-.: "~:
-...
'.
-'-
'-.
.- ".,.'
L'
'-
~
~
:;,
:S"'
;.;:,
:,"~
."
;::;.~
!';""
~~~
.--
:~~
._~
'"
~
'"
."
'-.!:.
.I 'lo
~~~iim;~:~~~~~~r;i~
!'
.:...~~
------. ..
-~. -
. - :-::-----""01..
:::::.,
'-...'
,
-I
-_.~-"
""'-:,,,-- -
~:
- . '='~-=;;..
/I--d
1/' /
'..
-"- -
J3 It
?,=S'JI~:i::-
.--. r
. ~..) I....
_:;.~.c. I -
'-
?.!-.sS~D. A???:OV~D. and t..DDPT::D by thE Cny Council of tilE ':1:',1 of C:::_i..~ \hsi:a,
California. :his 26th day of May, i 998. by the tali owing VOlS:
,v::-.
,..." -'='.
Councilmembers:
MOOL Padillc, Rinoone. Sales and HOri:J:--i
~.!-.Y::s:
Councilmembers:
Nons
t..3.S::f\JT:
c:.oun:::ilmembers:
Nons
t..=:SiAIf\::
:':lunC:ltmembe:-s:
None
S~~~~
ATT=:Si:
~ll (! (2.v:U~
Beverly Ai Authelet, City Clerk
ST A T~ 0:= CALIFORNIA
COUNTY 0:= SAN DI~GO
CITY 0:= CHULA VISTA
I, Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk of Chula Vista. California, do hereby certify that the
ioregoing Resolution No. 19014 was duly passed, approved. and adopted by the City Council
at a regular meeting oi the Chula Vista City Council held on the 26th day oi May, 1998.
~xecuted this 26th day of May, 1998.
c1Z
()~
Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk
)]//7
(.un72
_3:JY7. ~
('dIJ) cNW 17'tNl:J .!G~
J.N3Jf3SY.3 3::JNr'N3iN/Wr I ;':
of' :JNIJ.NY7d.I33~ .!;'G
cMV 7'tNl:J
83e1 J.N3Jf3SY.3 NM/O
Jf8aJ.S of' .!GAGS .OZ'
I .l37N/ "cI'Jf,:)
of' '() ':) :LSCG 3I10Jf38
'O':).-Jt r. 3cJI..J. 'LL'Z'!;+I I
\'"
.
M
Eo-
Z
~
~
==
U
-<
Eo-
Eo-
-<
33S)
JlYO
. . .
I ~
I ~~~
r- ~e~
I ~~~ ',~
~~~
-
~;"~
Co I ,F- e
~ r III ~
I 9
at/601 'ON
cMV .!Gel 1N31'GSY.3 NMKJ III I
Jf80JS of' .!GAGS .OZ' :LSlJG
2(7(7(..(.. III I 'ON d[7"!V
0(,,-98 'ON -1Jf7"H-1111 I [7"-15//1 [7"7I7HJ
(o-()()!;t)
'0'5 "cI':)(I IZ' :LS/JG'fn I
'0';) -Jt-~ 3cJI..J. :LSCG 01 +01 = I
3MIO HSY .!GII/8 -JtZ"9-Jt+Z'
./
------- 2
3AIHO _ H3AIH
\\
'H'Jf'5 :LS/JG ~ I
311/80 HSY .!G/l/8 (J!;1J9+Z' ~~I
- 00+01 II~~.
jJ-jg' ~8
~
A TT ACHMENT 3
~'/.)
{/rff
, -/1P
~h~1
O~~ .. ___-
/I (),,-P - .-
Zl ~ --=::::: -
~'/.I~~ --=::::: -;:;..--
...r-e..--::;~
---~~
.;::::::- ----
---n-
~ e;#r. ~
---!ft~ ~ew 6'f'-
f;7.'" t)
It f~" .ecf'
---
---
---
~
.'
....
;;::>-:::;.:;::::::':::::::-:':::-":'::::-"::~::::::::::: ......
----~.....-.,.- ---.-- .....~~.,'
, ,
"'-,~\
..., "'. '"
\. \.....
;, '\ \,
\ "'oj
\ \\ \
\ .,
\ \\
\ \ \
\ \\ \
" 1.\
\ \\
):]-/
S
&0
BELLA NA VONA SEWER
AL TERNA TIVE 1
ATTACHMENT 4
-
--- -
--- .--:::: ..-
~ .--:::: ;;.--
~I~ ;;.--
--e'/.l~ ::::::--- ..- .,...,..
..--:::::: ::::::-- ---
::::::--- ---
__ ?f~t
___~. f-tl;f
f.~tJv
pn'l. ")
( frff~ .
~i11,11le?
Dt2~
---
--
---
~
.-
...
,,";:.::"~~~"'~""~'\~;,
"\ ... \.
\. \\
\\. '\\. \
" \',
. ..
\ \ \
.\. \\ \
\ \, \.
~ I '.
" ',\
/3',2?J
S
&0
BELLA NA VONA SEWER
AL TERNA TIVE 2
\
'. -::0
\"" \<.
. , .....
\::,\ \'~ ~
",
\\
\\. \~
." ""t-
0" ~
'\ \\ ~
i : \
\. "\\ 0
t;\\ \~
i \\ <..
I" .....
;' j} \,.,
. "
, 'f
! .Ii
. .' r
/ .-/
" -,'
/ i./ \
./-' /,>"-;?, /.
.~.,...., ./ /" /'./
_.<;~.-.-~ ./
';:::>- ~ ....-r./
...--: -::::::--
::.----
--
---
--
""'~~~~~~;\'\~\ \\
"
\ \\ \
\ ". ~
\ \\
, ;. ~ .
, "
\ \\
. '\
'. \, \
\ \, \,
'. \'.
\ " \
ATTACHMENT 5
-
-- --
-- ----:::::: --
-- ----:::::: ::::::--
-- ~ ::::::-- ..-
---;::::::::- ..-
~ --
--
--
___ -- IAff~O~0
-<1 f5 l
Ufll,,/Ij
!I~~
~
.'
....
/J~02
S
&0
BELLA NA VONA SEWER
AL TERNA rIVE 3
BASILE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BID QUOTATION
ATTACHMENT 6
Basile' COl1slfuciivn, 1m:. hereby propOJ'(!,l 10 furnish aI/labor, I/Imerilll Cllld eljuipmelll /I(.'('L'ssury 10 paJorm ,he fulJowill8 items oj work,
subject to the terms alld collditiollS staled hereill. This quotatioll is valid for 3U days.
To
Company
Address
Chl'is BUllce
Western Pacific Housing
7152 Tanager Drive
Carls bad, Ca.. 92009
Date: 12/21/98
Phone 603-9699
Fax 603.9787
Project Name/Desc Bella Navonu
Addendums Noted
Wages:
Sewer Alternative #
NON-PREV AILING
1
Plans Provided
Spec's Provided
r"i.l N.t" .nd C..ditin~
I tem Description
1 8" pvc on radius
2 Abandon ex. sewer in place
3 Conn. to & Re-channel ex. M,H.
4 Utility Conflict
5 Traffic Control (sub Out)
6 Shorein9
7 Curb & Gutter Remove, Haul Off
8 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Replace
9 Asphalt Paving, Sawcut & Removal
Unit
L.S.
L.S,
L.S.
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QTY
1
1
1
Unit Cost
$12,989,10
$1,130,12
$1,293.97[
$1 ,4S8,20 I
$2,530,00 I
$1,715.801
$1,939,89
$3,220.00
$7,406,00 I
Item Cost
$12,989.10
$1.130.12
$1,293,97
$1,458.20
$2,530.00
$1,715,80
$1,939.89
$3,220.00
$7.406,00 I
1
1
1
Grand Total $33,683,08
20% ~~c."l ,'fI.~J Bee ,(,,2-
~A.l.- : ~40J4lCj. fo
,+ c.c;f/.. 1f'".....-p;1~ '.'
lUll CONIlITIClNS:
1. Work \\;11 he done in accordana: "ith plans. !tpeciricaction~ and quantitie~ identified aoove. ^1tcrntion~ will be e:-.:ecuted upon wrinen orders. and will hecomc
an ex.tra char~c Over und above this estImate.
2. Rel{uirel.! Cahfornia Preliminary wen infomlatioll (California Civil Col.!e Sectiun 3097/3098) Lo bc proviJeJ. MCl.:hallil:s Lien Laws unJcr California Cooe of
CiVIl Procedure~ Section 11&1 et Seg is enforced. Suhjcct to credit approval and vcrification of California 1.ien information.
3. Bid does not include any stakinp:, engineering, permits & fees, bonds, inspection fees, concrete or eompactiollleSting.
l. Graue 10 be recein:d +/~ l" for concrele rdaled work..
5. III the event it hccomes necessary to do any drilling or shooting for rock. breaking of undiggahle ground or huried concrete and rellloyal to a designated dispo.....1
area; or, any unusual conditions encounlercd such as undcrgrounl.! piping. unl.!cI!:ruu d . Iv Llash 'posi s eLl... re dCt:lUC cause for adJiLiunal charge:;. Dil.!
hems rc(crcm;cd alxwe musl be diggable with lhe following cquipment:,
6. All excess spoil \nll be spread out evenly alollg trench area unless specllied otherwise ill pl'Oposal.
7. Any addcd matelial nceded below or ahove pipe 7,one due to rock relllOval, underground \yatcr or utlcolllpactcd till an:n.~ \\.ill bc supplied and installed ba.<;ed 011
T&M.
H. Pipe in deep fill area<; i!'l figured to he installed during grading operations. All rights-of-way for materials to he made hy the grading contractor with two (2) foot
maximum cover over top of pipe before installation. ,
9. After instaUijtion of stuml dmin pipt~ ;md SU"UC1Uft\ nasilr ConslnKiloll, Inc. will nol bt.~ lrsponsible f()r t:i1rlh, rocks, or oilIer fordgn 1l1<1lt:rial which may enlt".r
into pipe or Structure by natural or othcr causes.
10. Accounts delinquent after thiry (30) days are subject to the maximum finance charge allowed by la\\'. plus any Incuned attomey fees.
II. AU work. is ligun:d to be wmpleled in onc continuous operation. Any sloppage or addlional movcs \\ill bc an CXLrd c.:harge. Any pllic;ing of waLer will cosl cxLrJ.
for connection and shut down & stalt ups. All final adjustmcllt nf manholes and gate val\'cs to be cnmJlktcd at Olle timc.
12. All Agrecments arc contingent on acts ot' god. shortages, or other conditions beyond ow. control.
Sent By:
Accepted By:
(Signature of Authorized Agent)
7840 Dunbrook Road' San Diego, CA 92126-4369' (619) 586-7800' FAX (619) 586-7809
JJ-c2-;:L
Date:
BASILE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BID QUOTATION
ATTACHMENT 7
Basile COJlJlfucLion, 1m:. hereby proposeJ 10 jurlUJh alllaba" malerwl alld e'iuipmelll lleWJJary 10 perform lhe fol/owmg items oj work.
subject /0 the terms alld collditiolls stated here ill, This quotutioll is valid jar 3U OOys,
To
Company
Address
Chris Bunce
Western IJacific Housing
7152 Tanager Drive
Carls bad, Ca.. 92009
Project Name/Desc Bella Navona
Addendums Noted
SP.!cial Notes and Co~i!ions
Plans Provided
Spec's Provided
Sewer
Date: 12/21/98
Phone 603-9699
Fax 603.9787
Wages:
Alternative #
'H(
(1~.
NON-PREV AILING
2
\:
Item Description
1 8" pvc
2 Abandon ex, sewer in place
3 Manhole (S- 17)
4 Utility Conflict
5 Traffic Control
6 Shoreing
7 Curb & Gutter Removal
8 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Replace
9 Asphalt Paving. Sawcut. & Remove
Unit
L.S
L.S,
E.A.
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QTY
1
1
Unit Cost
1
$12,919.59
$ 1,416.29
$6,471.35
$1,458.20
$2,530.00
$1,715.80
$ 1,939,89
$3,220,00
Item Cost
$12,919.59
$1.416.29
$6,471.35
$ 1,458.20
$2,530.00
$1,715.80
$ 1.939.89
$3,220,00
$7.406.00 I $7,406.00 I
$39,077.12
20% u...m..JGS"....Lc.'t I -1,<?J1S,42-
44>, 89 z... ,g.f
!Un CONI)ITIONS:
1. Work will he done in accordance with plan~, spccificaction:<> and quantities identified ahove. Alterations will he e"eculed upon '\'fillen orders, and will ~come
an cX,tra cbar~e o~er and, a~ve thi~ cs~matc.. ~. . _.. _. ". . . .. . .
2. RC<tuucd Cahfornla PrChnullaIY Lell IIlfurmaLJon (Llhfonua CIVIl Lode SCl.:lWll 3097/3098) 10 be provlued. Medlarul.:l; Lien L.\\\s ulluer Cahforma Cude of
CiVil Proccdurc~ Section IIRI ct Scg i~ cnforeed. Suhjcct to credit approval and verification of California l,icn infonnation.
Bid does not inctude any staking, engineering, pcmtils & fees, bonds, inspection fees, concrete or compaction testing.
Grade to be rect:ived +/- 1" for concrete reluted work.
ill the cvcnt it becomes necessary to do any drHling or shooting for rock, breaking of lUldiggablc growld or bw'icd concrctc and rcmoval to a dcsiguated disposal
area; or, any unusual conditions encounlereu such as underground piping, unuergrou u v'lve' lJash <.lj;pysils, elc. are de t.:aW:ie for auditionaJ t.:harges. Di<.l
Items referenced abovt'. must be digg<lble willi the follo\\ing equipmenl: _ _ c.~ .
6. All exccss spoil will bc sprcad out cvcnly along trcnch arca unlcss specJtlcd othcnnsc Itl proposal.
7. A.ny addcd matcrial necded below 01' above pipe zonc due to rock removal, wldergrowld water or uucompacrcd till areas will be supplied and installed based on
T&M.
R. Pipe in deep fill area'\ i~ figured to he installed during grading operations. All righte;-of-way for materials to he made hy the grading contractor with two (2) foot
maximum cover over top of pipe before inswlalion.
9. Afler inSlallalion of storm dmin pipe amI struclUre. Dasile ConslIudlon, Inc. willnol be rnpollsiblt~ [or earLh, rocks, or oLher foreign m<llerial which lIDlY enter
into pipe or ~tructurc hy natural or othcr causes.
10. Accounrs delinquent after thiry (30) days are subject to the maximum tlnance charge allowed by law. plus any incurred anorney fees.
11. All work is figureJ lo be wmpletc:J in one continuous operation. Any Sloppuge or aJJtional movc:s \\illlx: an extra charge. Any phusing of walc:r will cosl exlrd
for connection and shut down & stat1 ups. All final adjustmeJlt of manholes and gate valves to be completed at one time.
12. ^1I ^greel1\cnts arc contingent on acts of god, shol1agcs, 01' other conditione; heyond ollr control.
Sent By: ~
3.
-I.
5.
.~
Grand
1
1
Total
\C,...,L.
Accepted By:
(Signature of Authorized Agent)
7840 Dunbrook Road, San Diego, CA 92126-4369' (619) 586-7800 . FAX (619) 586-7809
/J~,}-.:J
Date:
BASILE CONSTRUCTION, INC.
BID QUOTATION
ATTACHMENT 8
Basile COl1slfuCJiolJ, Inc. hereby proposes 10 furnish all labor, malerial and equipment necessary 10 perform lhe following ilcms of work,
subject to the terms alld cOllditiolls stated here ill, This quotatioll is valid for 3U days,
To
Company
Address
Chris Bunce
West.ern J'acilic Housing
7152 Tanager Drive
Carls bad. Ca., 92009
Date: 12/21/98
Phone 603-9699
Fax 603-9787
Project Name/Desc Bella Navolla
Addendums Noted
r'~l NDt~. aDd CoodlUaD'.
Item Description
1 8" pvc
2 Manhole (S-17)
3 Conn, to & Re-channel ex. M.H.
4 Abandon ex. sewer in place
5 Trench shoring(Unstable Sand)
6 Traffic Control (Sub out)
7 Utilitie Conflict
8 Curb &Gutter Remove-Haul Off
9 Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Replace
10 Asphalt Paving. SawCut & Removal
Wages: NON-PREVAILING
Plans Provided Sewer Alternative # 3
Spec's Provided
Unit QTY Unit Cost Item Cost
L.S. 1 $12,455.591 $12,455,591
E.A, 1 $6,471.351 $6,471.35 I
E,A. 1 $1.293,97 $1,293,97
L,S, 1 $1,083.48 $1,083.48
LS 1 $1,715.80 $1.715,80
LS $2,530.00 $2,530.00
LS $1,860,70 $1,860.70
LS 1 $2,316.80 $2,316.80
LS $3,220.00 I $3,220.00
LS $7,360.00 I $7,360.00
Grand Total $40,307.69
20% Cc..1n...1GEA.Jc'{! · 8,o<ol.SIt ."
I dTl'-L t( 4B,3t09. Z3
lUll CONf}lTIONS:
1. Work will he done in accordance \\;th plans, specificacrio:1S and quantities identified ahovt'. ^lterations ,\ill he e:o:ecuted upon writtell order.;, and ,,;11 become
an extra cbar~e over and above this estimate.
2. Re'(uin:d California Preliminary Lien infomlauon (California Civil Colle Se(;Lion 3097/3098) Lo be provided. Me(;hani(;::; Lien Lm::; under California Code of
CiVil Proccdurc!\ Scrtion 11&1 ct Scg i!\ enforced. Suhjcct to credit approval and vcrification of California J .icn information.
3. Bid docs not include any staking, engineering, pennits & fees, bonds. inspection fees, concrete or compaction testing.
..t Graue to be received +/. I" for conw;:Lt: re1aLed work.
5. III the event it becomes neeessa.ry to do allY drUlillS 01' shooting for rock. breaking of wldiggable growld or bw'icd coneretc and J"emo.,.'al to a designated disposal
area; or. any unUSllli.' I conditions em.:ountered such as unJergrounu PiPillg;mUl1U . n.u...va.lves,~sl:l ~osils,1'5i ~e et'.l'fneJ cause [or auuiLional charges. Biu
Items referenced <Lbove must be t.ligg;tble willi the folltl\\'ing elluipnwlll: ~ C~-r- ~~~$J~
6. All excess spoil Will be spread out e",'enly along trench area illlless specJJled 0 IClWISC III proposal,
7. Any added material needed below or above pipe zOlle due to fock removal, ulldeq;roillld water or illlcompacted fill areas will be supplied and installed based all
T&M
R. Pipe in deep fill area... i!\ figured to he installed during grading operations. All rights-of-way for materials 10 he made hy the grading contractor with two (2) foot
ma~mum cover over top of pipe before inslallation.
9. After inslilllalion of slonn drain pipe .md SlrUCLUft'., Dasiit' COllSlfllcitoll, lilt.". \\ ill noi be rcspollsibk fOf eanh, rocls, or (llher [(jfeign maleri.ll which ma)' eDler
into pipe or ~trueture hy natural or othcr causc~.
10. Accounts delinquent after tbiry (30) days are subject to the ma'l.imum finance charge allowed by law, plus any incurred attorney fees.
11. All work. is figured to be compleled in one continuous operation. Any stoppage or addlional moves will be an t::\.Lra charge. Any phasing of walt:r will cost extra
foJ' connection and shut down & staJ1 ups. All filial adjustment of manholes and gate valves to be completed at one time.
12. All Agrccmcnts are cOlltingcnt on acts of god, sho11age.~, or OIher conditions hc)'ond om COlltrol.
Sent By:
ccepted By:
(Signature of Authorized Agent)
7840 Dunbrook Road. San Diego, CA 92126.4369' (619) 586-7800 . FAX (619) 586-7809
/J~.2f
Date:
Samuel G. Avalos
663 Point Ferminc Court
Chula Vista, Ca 91911
(619)428-7609 (W) (619)42]-9390 (H)
Email: AvalosSam@aol.com
Objective
To serve my community with my contribution and involvement.
Education
University of Phoenix
San Diego, Ca
Bachelor of Arts in Management, 1996 GPA 3.46
Certificate in Human Resources Managel1lflnt, 1995
Wells Fargo Bank Retail University 1992
San Diego, Ca
Certificate in Personal Banking and Business Banking
1994-1996
Southwestern Community College
Chula Vista, Ca
General studies
1984-1993
Work Experience
Wells Fargo Bank
San Ysidro, Ca
Assistant Branch Manager
Assist in branch management. Help set sates and operational goals, and support in achieving them.
Develop and maintain consumer and business relationships.
1998-Present
Pacific Trust FeU 1997-1998
Chula Vista, CA
Administrator
Support in various areas of the credit union including card services, lending, and operations. Work
close with branch staff and loan officers. Responsibte for lien perfection on consumer loans.
Wells Fargo Bank
Chula Vista, Ca
Personal Banking Manager
Responsible for the management of a portfotio of mass affluent customers. Includes retention and
growth, in addition to servicing and maximizing cross-selling opportunities.
1987.1997
ExtraCurricular Activities
Associate Pastor, HAM Christian Community
/~K/J -;
-;.J..--C--'-'.-
Date: 7/6/98 7:22 AM
Priority: Normal
TO: Beverly Authelet at C,.-,LA VISTA
Subject: No subject given - Contents ____~_~_l2_JJ_~]___________
---------------------------- Message
Access Appeals Board X Ethics (Board of)
Aging (Commission on) Growth Mgmt oversight
Appeals & Advisors Housing Authority
Charter Review X Human Relations
X child Care X Int'l Friendship
Civil Service Library Board of Trustees
Committee
Cultural Arts
Commission
Design Review
Economic Development
RC'CEIVED
ClTb~tl' %' ~I,-G,om~is~ion
Gin . 1~~C:>I!l~~s~~on
cb\lriiuss~on
Southwest PAC
Town Centre PAC
United Nations Day
Mobilehome Rent Review
Veterans Advisory
Otay Valley Road PAC
Parks & Recreation
Youth Commission
other
Name: . Avalos, Samuel
Address: 1~ 663 Point Fermine Court
City, State, Zip:~ Chula Vista, CA, 91911
Res Phone #: ~ 421-9390, Bus phone: 691-1519
Registered Voter: yes
Do you live within the City limits of Chula Vista? yes, How long? 32 yrs
For Youth Commission applicants only: School attending: , Grade:
Colleges attended & degrees held
Southwestern Community College
University of Phoenix - B.A. Management, certificate in Human resources
Management.
Present Employer: Pacific Trust FCU, position: Administrator
What are your principal areas of interest in our city government and what
experience(s)
or special knowledge can you bring to those areas?
There are various areas that are of interest to me. My educational and
vocational background will allow me to serve in one of these areas. In
addition to my current employment, I am an'Associate Pastor for a Hispanic
church here in Chula vista, NAM Christian Community. I have served in all
levels of the church throught many years, and currently work with children.
This I do with heart above other interests.
What would you hope to accomplish by your participation?
My contribution to the city of Chula vista will enable me to become a
better
citizen allowing me to give back to the people the
been born and raised here in Chula Vista, and I am
community. It is my desire to make a difference in
and all children grow into model citizens here.
best
very
this
of myself.
interested
city so my
I have
in this
children
I am familiar with the responsibilities assigned
to the Board/Commission/Committee ~~h-~WiSh
to serve. yes
d- \\~\J\)
r\1
.: -;,';";-..C::?:;;:\~;':~:;'
'''~;>.:... "BOARl>fCOMMlSSION!COMMlITEE'AJ,>PLICATION,i,'/'
..::':~"i
,
xf~?:::,:<'~, ..
': o.;}'"
-:.;.;.;.
;~: :'1..-'
~'~~,:j;-;,: '~':'-):~'~i*j",rr' :::1:';i":''[''":''':'~;i!;~~-:~~?; >::~':"'>: '-~',ji1"'<i:;:.tH;;:)>{,~~. ..
. '..,. ,...i.'., ,;/~/;\:int''''"'~'-':'' '":;..r,~<",/'l.'''
Home 'address:,.~.!:~ ~,,';.-,;, '~::~ /"';'~~ ,:'>- /';;d ;r-,~, tt7, . b',?,
: '-\;':",.,' ,_,;', :'>~,: ,;~,:_~:;?,;\:-~>-~~^;,:,-:"",~~. ,,":"""" ,~",c-'_" ;.",,!
Res plwneno: '~b';'~' f;,f .~ " &s pj,;~ ~o: Registered voter in Club.' Vi~~' ~es . _no
f~'~~~<~:::~:t~~:::~:<
"'-~<. ". > ':.:, _..'~ :,: ';:t,~~:}'?:}:~t~i:,~f~/ ~ -,', ,:. :'\,~,:,~~'_~,_,~\~':'~::." ~":_,,.,. I
',',f',,""
.,"~,,'~ ~.-
'~;k'- f,~'~
c:.;;',.
'-;.'-J:-:''-*-~:~
i.'. ,:'~,,"
City:
du!~~Y:}i/'~
"-""
"""':'.'"
Zip:
::
f'I f";o
'-!;
, Position:
",,'r
K:~~:~I~J~';!%$1?~j~~{~1~;:i;::.;';"2,; .:~
.,,- t; '" " ';,>. ,. ,,' .', v'~ ':,~-,<,_., ,,,.':.:_):
~, ' ;::~J""~:F ;':;:;. ., ..; '<:_:_'1.'->;~'" ~"_'"'
. What are yourprincip8l areaS of intenSl in our .city government and what experience(s) or special knowledge can you bring to those.
arwi?"/ ;r,c2'i'(!f...~~ #~oJ~_~;>Cr;__'.I;';" __ aE_r,'E.;~~'-4,y~,./C
/ :1/~~./:7fiic;i:-;/$'fi;'i1'~jh", . " .':, ''i'
"1:,+,'~ :}:;";.:; ., '.:!:~_/~ '~~-,,-, t.:'-:;>~~~~ . . ">'>" ,. J:", ~:,:(:F:-" ~,:-_,
.... .
;.,.
'~i
t~~
?i
':-?;~~~';1:
}.!~:
1
'~
. ; ',I
". -,..,~..
; '!:i~':;,",.i;
", ,.', "....
" 'J,,""."',"
:~t'~:'''.;~?Jt
'~
'"
,.}'i--j'
,,;~
"
What woUld you hope to}ccomp1isl1 by yo,:" part;cipat;on?
<i',,"
./:
,..-:_ -r-;H ",
'"i... n-"/,,,/~O
/ .
- ~;--;J;;
u; 71. . tn/#(
/ ct/~"'_rl
fX&*,r"
<~'" I/~
, ','..-',;,.
CI./J'." ,,'~ .,/ IC~'- .~ -.-~v
", / ,.
L....i-; ~;
"'.-!;"#""-;Ji
/n
7f:~
...../21:
ij ,1-.c.
with the responsibilities assigned to the Board/Commission/Committee on whicb I wish to serve.
uJ ~;:r
If //7/fl
...-
**
/6/1-/
* Please see the reverse side of this Application for Ve", ImDoTtanJ Leeal infonnation
Signature
Date
***