Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1979/06/12MINUTBS OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL ~BTING OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, 'CALIFORNIA ' Held Tuesdayl~.,~:00 p.m. june 12!.1.979' ' A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula ViSta, California, was held on the above date beginnin~ at 7:00 p.m. in the Council ChamberS~ Public Services B~i~ding~ 276 Fourth Avenue. ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Cox, ~gdahl, Gillow Councilmen absent: Councilman Scott ~ Staff present: City 'Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager · Asmus, Deputy City Manager Robens, City Engineer Lippit~, DireCtor of Planning Peterson, City Librarian Simon, Transit Coordinator Bloo~ Administrative Analyst Swartfager, Director o~ Parks and'Re. creation Hall, Acting Director of Building and~H0using Hans'ell~ The pledge of aliegiance to the Flag was led by MayEr.Hyde followed~by a momentof silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by COuncilman Egdahl, seconded by Councilman Cox ~nd unanimously ¢arrie~ by those present that the minutes of the meeting of June 5, 1979 be approved, Copies having been sent to each Councilman. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY None 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS James Mathotly Mr. Mathotly read a statement he gave before the Metropoli! 402 Oaklawn Avenue Transit Developmen~ Board~in San Diego on Men'day, June 11~ Chula Vista 1979 in which he spoke against the Amtrak operations, MTDB. Regional Coast Commission, Regional Employment and Traininl Consortium and the high government spending. 4. WRITTEN COM~fdNICATIONS None PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS 5. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde CONSIDERATION OF 19tl ACT opened the public hearing. IMPROVE~NT DISTRICT 79-1 ON WALNUT AVENUE FROM 192 City Engineer oLippitt stated that ~ on December 12, 1978, th FEET NORTHBRLY OF PALOMAR Council accepted apeti~i0n to establish a 1911 Act Distri STREET TO 735.5 FEET in this area (Resolution 9~99). Since the petition was NORTHERLY .si~ed by property owners repres~n~ihg 70.94% of the. asses la~d within the ~etl~daTies'I~f the prop6sed assessment disi trict, the proje~t:fs e~empt from the reqUirement~ of the Special Investigation, Debt Limitation ahd Majority Protea Act of '~931. . Written protests City Clerk Fulasz stated she received no written protests. Sewer In answer to the Council's query, Mr. Lippitt noted that the properties are lower than the existing sewer in this street and that the sewer cannot be extended as a center. gravity sewer because it will be above the elevationbflth pavement. The property owner that installed the sewer has made arrangements with some of the properties in this area to connect to his main. Under this District, the Ci{y-wil purchase the main sethat the rest of the properties.along this street can connect to this sewer. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -2- June 12, 1979 Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. 5a. RESOLUTION NO. 9621 The resolution authorizes the work to be done and designates ORDERING IMPROVEMENTS TO the City Engineer to advertise, receive and open the bids. BE MADE UNDER THE PRO- VISIONS OF THE IMEROVE~NT ACT OF 1911 AND AMENDMENTS THERETO IN THE 1100 BLOCK OF WALNUT AVENUE FROM 192 FEET NORTHERLY OF PALOMAR STREET TO 735.5 FEET NORTHERLY AND AUTHORIZING CITY ENGINEER TO ADVERTISE, RECEIVE AND OPEN BIDS Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Cox Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott 6. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde VACATION OF MADISON opened the public hearing. AVENUE FROM "H" STREET TO 290 FEET SOUTH On December 12, 1978, Ms. Harriett R. Stone submitted a request to vacate the subject portion of Madison Avenue. In a written report to Council, the City Engineer explained that Ms. Stone's plans were to renovate the adjacent proper- ties to the east and west sides of Madison Avenue which she owns. The street was dedicated as an easement for street purposes by the owner in 1955 With the possibility of con- necting this portion of Madison Avenue to an existing portiol 330 feet to the south. Since that time, the southerly por- tion has been modified to a cul-de-sac and the property between the north and south portions has become a retail shopping center. Planning Commission The Planning Commission recommended approval of the subject recommendation vacation with the condition that the petitioner grant a 25 foot easement for ingress and egress to the owners of the property abutting the southerly terminus of the subject portion of Madison Avenue. Harriett Stone Ms. Stone stated her father owned the property since 1945-46 6566 Ridge Manor Avenue In 1954, an agreement was reached to provide for the improve. San Diego, CA 92120 ment of Madison Avenue with the understanding that the road would continue southerly. Since that time, the southerly property has developed as a shopping center. Ms. Stone added that she intends to develop her property with a com- mercial shopping area"which she feelS will greatly enhance the area. Don Schoell Mr. Schoell said he was the architect for the project and Schoell ~ Paul, Architects showed the Council an overall concept of what they are 440 Upas Street proposing. San Diego, CA Held Tuesday - 7:00'~p.m. -3- June 12, 1979 Speaking against request Speaking against the request were: Frank Shugrue, Vice President and Manager of California First Bank; Mitch Angus, 3953 Bandini Street, San Diego; Joseph Fis~ 3777 Fourth Avenue, San Diego; Frank Goldberg, 1231CaminO del Rio South, San Diego. Their statements were: (1) In 1954, California First Bank acquired the property from the owners with the con- dition that north of the bank location, a 40 foot easement would be given back to what is now Madison Avenue; (2) a second condition of the Bank purchase was that Madison Avenue would be developed; (3) if the 40 foot road were closed, all of the traffic will funnel through Broadway; (4) Nurseryland gets55% of its commercial trade from Madison Avenue and 100% for its trucking use; (5) complaints that the people in the area were not notified of the hear- ings before the Planning Commission and the City Council; C6) the Chula Vista Shopping Square is serviced by Madison Avenue; (7) ingress to the shopping center for cars going north on Broadway is to make a left turn on "H" Street and then another left turn on Madison; (8) noted the document which obligates the family of Harriett Stone to improve Madison Avenue; (9) to approve the application would be to negate that document. Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. City Engineer's comments In answer to the Mayor's query, Mr. Lippitt said he was not aware of the agreement referred to by those property owners speaking in opposition to this request. Mr. Lippitt added that the street will not be closed - there will be vehicle access across the property; however, it will not be a public street. If the street is vacated, the curbs and sidewalk will be removed. Council discussion Discussion ensued as to the questions raised by those pro- testing the vacation; a continuation of the item so staff can meet with these people to try to resolve some of the issues; on the chance that an agreement is not reached, the public hearing should be reopened to give the property owners a chance to testify again. Motion to continue It was moved by Councilman Gillow and seconded by Council- man Cox that this item be continued for two weeks at which time the public hearing will be reopened, and that staff be directed to meet with the property owners in question. Added to motion Councilman Gillow added to his motion that a resolution be brought back for Council consideration at that meeting - a resolution which would provide for approval. Motion carried Councilman Cox agreed to the second and the motion carried unanimously by those present. 7. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde CONSIDERATION OF REVISED opened the public hearing. PRECISE PLAN FOR DEVELOP- ~NT OF TELEGRAPH CANYON TERRACE CONDOMINIUMS AT 500-630 Telegraph Canyon Road - JLEN, Inc. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -4- June 12, 1979 In a written report to Council, Director of Planning Peterson explained that in August 1973, the Planning Commission approveda precise plan for the development of 179 apartment units on the 15+ acres. After the propert changed hands, the new owner reduced the density to 152 units while maintaining the same basic site plan. In June and July of last year, the Planning Commission and the City Co.uncil conducted public hearings on the tentative map and authorized the applicants to proceed with a condo- minium conversion of the proposed apartments. After the site was graded and the units were well along in con- struction, the City found that the subject property had not been graded in accordance with the approved plans. All work was stopped and staff required the developer to prepare plans showing the existing slopes. Because of the significant changes from the approved plan, staff required the developer to submit a revised precise plan for both Planning Commission and Council review. Planning Commission The Planning Commission recommended approval of the revised recommendation precise plan in accordance with their Resolution (PCM-79-25 which requires the removal of the top floor from three of the buildings (6 units). Slides shown Mr. Peterson presented slides of the homes noting units "A", "B", "C" and "D" which he indicated significantly block the views from some of the homes on Manzanita Street (525 to 575 Manzanita). He stated that building "A" was moved 40 feet closer to the common property line and the pad elevation was 24 feet higher than on the approved plan. Building "B" was moved 28 feet closer to the property line was was 21 feet higher in elevation. Building "C" was built 15 feet closer to the property line and 16 feet higher in elevation. Building "D" is 21 feet closer to the property line and S feet higher in elevation. Alternative noted Mr. Peterson reviewed the Planning Commission and staff recommendation stating the alternative would be to require the developer to raze. the buildings or move them off the property, regrade the slopes and relocate the build- ings. At the advice of the City Attorney, this is now the staff's recommendation to Council. Joseph Lathers Mr. Lathers remarked that the project has problems and 600 Telegraph Canyon Rd. they are here tonight to solve these problems. He said Chula Vista that the grading problem was not noticed until the building! were up; at which point, they came to the City to try to solve the problem. Mr. Lathers added that they are now looking for sympathy from the Council and felt it would be "fair to them to not take down anything and not change any roofs." Richard LatherE Mr. Lathers'stated that "cOnstruCtion business is tough" 2350 Palm Avenue and because of the problems with this subdivision, a number San Diego of people from Chula Vista have been put out of work. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -5- June 12, 1979 Jack Mann Mr. Mann declared that they are not arguing the fact Attorney for Developers that the project does not conrplywith the previously approved plan. They have a "deviation" of this plan which must be dealt with now. The developer is experi- encing severe financial hardships: over one-half millio: dollars at this point in time and possibly in excess of one million if the six units must be removed. Mr. Mann stated they need a resolution of this problem tonight. He reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation in- dicating opposition to the removal of the upper floors of six units since-the buildings are "structurally sound' and it would be an economic waste. As an alternative, the developers are proposing that the pitch of the roofs be altered so that an additional 4 feet of view can be picked up, plus the fact that they will build a privacy fence for those people who are affected, in varying degr, as a result of this deviation. Speaking against approval Speaking against the approval of the revised precise plan were: Allen Andrews, 541 Manzanita; William Smith, 545 Manzanita; Cama Malone, 525 Manzanita; Thomas Maxwell, 5' Manzanita; Isaias Arenas, 535 Manzanita; and Charles Ave: 587 Manzanita Street. Their objections were as follows: (1) Twelve families on Manzanita have hired legal counsel as of last night, and since their attorney cannot be present at this meeti~ they are requesting a continuation of this matter; (2) grading in the back yard of the homes is quite steep; (3Z no plans for any run-off of rain waters; (4) bought thei: homes with the assurance they would have a view; (5) eve~ with the top floors removed from the units, some of the homes on Manzanita would still not have a good view; (6) property owners on Manzanita that have had their view obstructed have been offered a "substantial" amount of money from the developer's attorney; (7) developer shoul~ be made to conform to City requirements the same as a private home owner would have to do; (8) noted their con. cerns to the developer when the units were being construl Electrical contractor Mr. Jerry Waiters, 1031 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista, stated he had to lay off a number of people due to this controversy and asked that the matter be resolved as quickly as possible. Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. Council discussion Discussion followed as to the role of the Council in thi~ hearing; the judgment of the Council in the decision; staff's position on the original and revised plan; ad- hering to the Planning Commission's recommendation of removing the top floors from six of the units; the feasi- bility of razing the units; setting a precedent if allow~ is made for the developer not to have to adhere to the original grading plan. Motion to bring back It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman resolution Gillow that the staff be directed to bring back a resolu- tion which would accept the Planning Commission recom- mendations on this matter with one' exception: Unit "A" be removed without replacement. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -6- June 12, 197~ Discussion of motion Discussion followed regarding achieving proper grading of the premises; retaining walls; drainage problems; setting a precedent of non-compliance with plans; method of raising the building to lower the grades; "harshness" of the present motion. Substitute motion It was moved by Councilman Gillow and seconded by Council- man Cox that the staff be directed to bring back a resolution to require the relocation of buildings "A", "B", "C" and "D", and also as part of the motion, if the staff does not feel this is the best alternative, to come back with a preferred alternative if they see that is necessary. Motion restated Councilman Gillow said he is asking for staff to prepare a resolution for relocation of the four buildings ("A", "B", "C" and "D") to conform to the plan as previously approved. Discussion of motion Director of Planning Peterson said he would like to talk to the engineers and building inspectors about this motion prior to any comment he could make. Deputy City Manager Robens indicated the motion was feasible; however, he would like to take a look at the revised grading plan to see what the impacts would be. Mayor Hyde felt the motion was an "over-kill" of what is a reasonable solution to a difficult situation. Councilman Cox remarked that he is less concerned about the distance of the buildings from the adjacent single family dwellings as he is concerned about the overall height. He added that he is agreeable to having the staff come back to the Council with some direction in trying to meet the developer half way in requiring the lowering of the buildings to the agreed upon grading plan heights. In answer to the Council's query, Director of Planning Peterson said he could have this report back to the Council next week. Motion carried The substitute motion for a resolution for relocation of the four buildings carried by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl Noes: Mayor Hyde Absent: Councilman Scott Recess A recess was called at 9:11 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:37 p.m. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING 8. RESOLUTION NO. 9622 On May 23, 1979, the Council approved the installment WAIVING BID REQUIREMENTS purchase of a Burroughs B-2805-2 computer. Staff recom- AND APPROVING AGREEMENT mended that the Council waive the bidding requirement WITH BURROUGHS CORPORA- and authorize the purchase of the computer from the TION FOR PURCHASE OF Burroughs Corporation. Purchase cost will be $127,814.20 B-2805-2 COMPUTER (including software and financing) for five years. The effective date of the contract is July 1, 1979. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -7- June 12, 1979 Resolution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted hy the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott 9. RESOLUTION NO. 9623 The original estimated cost of $1.22/mile for provision APPROVING SECOND A~NDMENT of parts of the Chula Vista Transit Routes 5 and 7 in TO TH2 AGREEF~NT.BETWEEN the unincorporat~d County area wasl based on the FY 79 THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA first quarter Aztec/ICity contract. The Council later AND THE COUNTY OF SAN approved a two-year Aztec contract at a FY 79 cost of DIEGO FOR PUBLIC TRANS- $1.3S/mile for the Chula Vista Transit service. City PORTATION SERVICES, administrative, planning and marketing costs are estimated FY 1978-79 AND to be $.20/mile thus resulting in a total revised CVT AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR cost of $1.SS/mile in FY 1978-79. The amendment to the TO EXECUTE SAID AMEND~NT agreement increases the CVT revenues an additional $16,212. Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott t0. RESOLUTION NO. 9624 This proposed agreement is based on San Diego Transit APPROVING AGREEMENT Corporation's unapproved budget which includes a 10-cent BETWEEN THE CITY OF fare increase (adult fares increased from 40¢ to 50~) CHULA VISTA AND SAN effective July 1, 1979. The agreement also reduces SDTC's DIEGO TRANSIT CORPORA- claim on Chula Vista's LTF monies from $158,424 in FY 1979 TION FOR PROVISION OF to $70,032 in FY 1980. INTER-CITY BUS SERVICE DURING FY 1979-80 Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, pa~sed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Cox Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott 11.' RESOLUTION NO. 962S The California Library Services Act provides for compensa- APPROPRIATING $S1,121.80 tion to all library system member libraries for services IN LIBRARY SERVICES ACT provided beyond their jurisdictions. The City has received FUNDS the second quarterly payment of $10,134.80 and anticipates receipts of additional payments of $16,091.60 (first quarter), $13,637.20 (third quarter) and $11,349.20 (fourth quarter) for a total allocation of $51,212.80. Staff recommended that the funds be placed in the books and materials budget of the Adult, Children's and Audio Visual sections. Resolution offered Offered-by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde~ Gillow, Cox Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -8- June 12, 1979 12. RESOLUTION NO. 9626 At the meeting of June 20, 1978, the City Council adopted WITHDRAWING THE "F" Resolution 9153 initiating the annexation of the territory STREET/HILLTOP DRIVE in accordance with the "island provisions" of MORGAand ISLAND ANNEXATION authorized staff to file the application with LAFCO. The TERRITORY FROM THE territory is currently being taxed for services by the BONITA/SUNNYStDE FIRE Bonita/Sunnyside Fire Protection District and in order PROTECTION DISTRICT to avoid dual taxation and overlapping jUrisdictiOn by the City and the District once the annexation is completed it is required that the territory be detached from said District. Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted by the following vote, to-wit: AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Cox Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND lADING OF ORDINANCES 13. ORDINANCE NO. 1870 The ordinance was placed on first reading at the meeting ADDING A NEW SECTION of June 5. It permits the City to adopt a ninety day 1.04.060 TO THE CITY statute of limitations on judicial review of administrativ, CODE RELATING TO THE decisions. TII FOR SEEKING REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION Ordinance placed on It was moved by Councilman Gillow that this ordinanc~ be second reading and placed on second reading and adopted, and that the read- adopted ing of the text be waived by unanimous consent of those present. The motion carried by the foliowing vote, to-wit AYES: Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde Noes: None Absent: Councilman Scott 14. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. Executive Session It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow and unanimously carried by those present that an Executive Session be held for personnel negotiations at the close of the meeting. b. Mission Cable City Manager Cole asked for Council's approval to add to presentation the June 14 Conference a presentation by Mission Cable re an update on switching over from 12 to 20 channel system. Motion to add to It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl Conference and unanimously carried by those present that the presenta. tion of Mission Cable be added to the June 14 Council Conference. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -9- June 12, 1979 REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 15. REPORT ON STREET LIGHT Deputy City Manager Robens submitted a written report ENERGY CHARGES FOR RE- in which he explained that in October 1978, the-CounCil ENERGIZED LIGHTS PAID offered to turn hack on the street lights that were FOR BY PRIVATE turned off (due to the reduced revenue sources) if the CONTRIBUTION City received ample funds to pay for the energy from the time of payment to July 1, 1979. Of the 400 lights that were turned off, approximately 45 people paid to have their lights turned back on. Since neither a street lighting district has been enacted by the Council, nor has a local government financing package been approved by the State Legislature, the staff is proposing to send a letter to the 45 people informing:them to submit funds ($56a year) to the-City tO provide for. the energy cost for next year. Staff furthe~ recomm~ffded continuation of the same operation this year; i.e., if people want the lights on, they must pay the entire cost. Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried bythose present that the staff report be accepted and alternative #2 be approved. MAYOR'S REPORT Status of Bonita/ Mayor Hyde asked the City Manager for a status report Sunnyside negotiations on this Fire Protection District's negotiations for either June 14 or June 19. Chamber report It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow and unanimously carried by those present that the report of Deputy City Manager Robens re the Council Chamber problems be added to the June 14 Council Conference discussions. Youth Commission Mayor Hyde noted that seven of the Youth Commission terms appointment have ended and that he would like to reappoint Richard Hillsbery to the Commission. Motion to ratify It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman Gillow and unanimously carried by those present that the appointment of Richard Hillsbery be ratified. Rohr Park Mayor Hyde complimented the staff on the reaction of the handling of the Rohr Park problem. Fee Committee report It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox and unanimously carried by those present that the Fee Committee recommendations (memo of City Manager dated May 7) be set for an early Council Conference (after June 14). Public Opinion Poll Mayor Hyde commended Councilman Gillow on the report re the public opinion poll. Motion for City Manager's It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by CouncilmanGillow report and unanimously carried by those present that the City Manager advise the Council on what it would cost to go forth with a poll such as suggested by Councilman Gillow and when this report comes forward, the Council consider what they wish to do at that time. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -10- June 12, 1979 Added to motion Mayor Hyde added to his motion that the City Manager docket the item re the public opinion poll at the next Council meeting plus the cost estimates. Councilman Gillow agreed to the second and the motion carried unani- mously by those present. Contract Administrations Mayor Hyde referred to the report submitted by the City Manager regarding this item in which he asked for Council reaction. Mayor Hyde noted that Councilman Scott was particularly interested in this item and he would not be back until after June 18. Motion to schedule item It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl and unanimously carried by those present that this item be docketed for either the meeting of June 19 or June 26. COUNCIL COMMENTS Reports on Rohr Park and Councilman Gillow complimented the staff on the report~ James Boyd submitted on the Rohr Park incident and the memo On the James Boyd case. Legislative recommendations Councilman Cox reported on SB 462 - control of billboards and other signs by the State. The Legislative Committee will send a communication to the Assembly Committee on Local Government reiterating Council's opposition to this Bill. SB 620 Councilman Cox explained that this Mills' Bill would eliminate the current 50% matching requirement, but would require a fare box plus local fund minimum. The Bill wou] be a vehicle to implement many of the transportation pro- posals contained in the Governor's announced $1.8 billion energy program. Motion to support SB 620 It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde and unanimously carried by those present that the CounCil got record supportins this Bill and !that appropriate communica tions be sent to the Legislature. Issues at November election Councilman Cox reported that Senator Robbins, author of t[ anti-forced busing constitutional amendment and Senator Campbell have requested that two issues be put befOre'-the voters at the November election: the Robbins anti-forced busing constitutional amendment and the Gann "Spirit 9f 12 spending limit. Motion to support It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde ant unanimously carried by those present that Council support these issues and communicate this to the appropriate State Legislators. Filling Council vacancy Mayor Hyde noted the resignation of Councilman Egdahl effective July 15. The City Attorney stated it was appropriate for the Council to commence the selection process for a replacement. Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. -11- June 12, 1979 Motion for procedure It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Gillow that the Council pursue the same procedure followed in the past on filling Council vacancies by accepting applications from parties that wish to be con- sidered for appointment to the Council, for the next two weeks - up through June 26 - and after that time, the Council schedule interviews with the candidates. Upon completion of the interviews, the Council will proceed with the process of selection prior to the time the vacancy actually occurs. Mayor Hyde noted that Councilman Egdahl will abstain from this entire selection process. Names submitted by Council Councilman Egdahl noted that in the past there was always the opportunity for CoUncilmembers to submit names. Included in motion Mayor Hyde Ancluded in his motion that the list of potenti~ candidates would not be limited to those that volunteer, but would include all those that seek the position and make it known through the City Clerk or CounCilmembers, plus any parties the Councilmembers may wish to suggest themselves at any time prior to the final selection. Councilman Gillow agreed to the second and the motion carried unanimously by those present. Press to be notified The City Clerk was asked to notify ~he press of this actiol Murals vs. graffiti Mayor Hyde said he received a suggestion to allow murals to be painted in certain areas. Motion for report It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow and unanimously carried by those present that the City Manager comment to the Council at the next meeting as to whether it would be appropriate to allow murals to be painted in those areas "plagued" by graffiti. Recess to Redevelopment Mayor Hyde recessed the meeting to the Redevelopment Agenc2 Agency meeting at 10:00 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 10:10 p.m Recess to Executive Session The Council recessed to Executive Session at 10:10 p.m. The City Clerk was excused and the City Manager was appoin' Deputy City Clerk. He reported that the meeting adjourned at 11:30 p.m. MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, JUne 12, 1979 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow Councilmen absent: Scott ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m. until Thursdav, June 14, 1979 at 4 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of JUne 12, 1979 STATE OF CALIFO}~NIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF SiUq DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOUP~N~.[ENT OF MF. ETI~]G CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say : That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, June 12, 1979 and said meeting was adjou. rned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on June 13, 1979 at the hour of 10:15 am I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of June 12, 1979 was held. Subscribed and sworn to before me this /~ day of ~: Np~ y Publi