HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1979/05/22 MINUTES OF A REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. May 22, 1979
A regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula ViSta, California, ~as held on
the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, P'ublic Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Gillow, Scott
Councilmen absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager
Asmus, Deputy City Manager Robens, Director of Planning Peterson,
City Engineer Lippitt, Director of Parks and Recreation Mall,
Director of Building and Housing Grady, Director of Finance Grant,
Transit Coordinator Bloom, Administrative Analyst Swartfager.
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde followed by a moment of silent
prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Councilman Gillow, seconded by Councilman
Scott and unanimously carried that the minutes for the
meetings of May 12, 14, 15 and 16, 1979 be approved, copies
having been sent to each Councilman.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (None.)
3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
James Matherly Mr. Matherly spoke against the Conrprehensive Planning Orga-
402 Oaklawn Avenue nization's application #55 requesting federal funds in the
Chula Vista amount of $818,258. He also reiterated comments made previ.
ously in opposition to the guideway transit project.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (None.)
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
5. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISH- opened the public hearing.
ING UNDERGROUND UTILITY
DISTRICT ON THIRD AVENUE By Resolution 9578, the Council ordered a public hearing to
FROM HERMOSA AVENUE TO "L" be held to determine whether public necessity, health, safe1
STREET or welfare required the formation of an underground utility
district on Third Avenue from Hermosa Avenue to "L" Street.
On April 18, 1979 the County Board of Supervisors passed an
ordinance approving the formation of the District and re-
quested that the City of Chula Vista establish an undergrou~
utility district to include those portions lying within the
City. There will be no cost to the City other than adminis-
trative expenses.
City Engineer Lippitt described the properties located in
the Chula Vista City limits which will need to convert to
underground service as they are served by lines located in
the County. He said the San Diego Gas & Electric Company
will fund the cost of the undergrounding.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 2 - May 22, 1979
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES fCont.]
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the
public hearing was declared closed.
Sa. RESOLUTION NO. 959S Offered hy Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the test
ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
UTILITY DISTRICT ON THIRD following vote, to-wit:
AVENUE FROM HERMOSA AVENUE
TO "L" STREET AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott, Cox
Noes: None
Absent: None
6, PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF PRECISE opened the public hearing.
PLAN FOR DEVELOPMENT OF
0.88 ACRE PARCEL AT 1887 The applicant submitted a precise plan for the development
NIRVANA AVENUE IN OTAY of a 38,S00 sq. ft. (0.88 acre) parcel located at 1887
INDUSTRIAL PARK Nirvana Avenue in the I-P zone. The plan conforms to the
development guidelines established for the Otay Industrial
Park as approved by Council.
Director of Planning Peterson described the building and ,
noted that 28 parking spaces have been provided for the
13,000 sq. ft. building area, which is more than required
by the ordinance. He said the Planning Commission recom-
mended approval of the Plan in accordance with their Reso-
lution No. PCM-79-22 and staff concurs with that recommen-
dation.
Errel W. Bruce Mr. Bruce said he was representing the Valle Verde Con-
7925 Linen Dr. struction Corporation and in answer to a question from the
Santee CA 92071 Council, he said the building as proposed is speculative,
but it was planned for light industrial and warehouse use.
Parking requirements In response to a question from Councilman Egdahl, Director
exceeded of Planning Peterson discussed the parking requirements of
the ordinance and said these requirements are reviewed at
the time of application for a business license. He further
stated, in addition to exceeding requirements for the build-
ing area, the parking exceeds the requirements for wholesale
and warehouse uses or manufacturing uses which may be per-
mitted in this area.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against, the
public hearing was declared closed.
6a. RESOLUTION NO. 9596 Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was waived
APPROVING PRECISE PLAN by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the following
FOR CONSTRUCTION OF vote, to-wit:
13,000 SQ. FT. BUILDING
AT 1887 NIRVANA AVENUE IN AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott
OTAY INDUSTRIAL PARK Noes: None
Absent: None
7. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT opened the public hearing.
TO THE CITY CODE RELATING
TO PANHANDLE (FLAG) LOTS Director of Planning Peterson stated that over the past
OR LOTS SERVED BY AN years the Planning Commission has granted variances from
EASEMENT the minimum lot frontage requirements in the single family
and two family residential zones permitting the creation of
panhandle (flag) lots and lots served by an easement. He
said the variance procedure does not fit these kinds of
developments very well, therefore, amendments to the Code
establishing regulations and guidelines governing the
development of panhandle lots are proposed.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 3 ~ May 22, 197~
PUBLIC HBARINGS AND RELATED .RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCBS CCont.l
The Planning Commission recommended adpption of the
amendments in accordance with their Resolution PCA-?9-5
and staff concurred.
"Panhandle" and "flag" In answer to a question from Councilman Gillow as to whether
lots the same there is a difference between "panhandle lots" and "flag
lots", Mr. Peterson said they are the same thing, but
because both terms are used, they were included in the
amendment.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either for or against,
the public hearing was declared closed.
7a. ORDINANCE NO. 1868 It was moved by Mayor Hyde that this ordinance be placed
AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.22, on first reading and that the reading of the text be
19.24 and 19.26 OF THE waived by unanimous consent.
CITY CODE RELATING TO
PANHANDLE (FLAG) LOTS, AND
LOTS SERVED BY AN EASE~NT -
FIRST READING
Concern regarding Councilman Scott referred to paragraph E of Sec. 19.22.150
wording of paragraph E, of the proposed ordinance reading: "Not more than four lots
Section 19.22.150 served by a private road or easement shall be allowed under
this provision unless this restriction is waived hy the
Director of Planning or City Council." He asked for clari-
fication as to when the Planning Director or the Council is
involved and expressed concern regarding the interpretation
of this wording.
Mr. Peterson said in the case of tentative maps, councii
approval is required; and lot splits involving four or more
parcels are processed by a parcel map and handled by the
staff.
Ordinance placed on The motion to place the ordinanae on first reading carried
first reading by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen GilloW, Scott, Cox, Egdahl
Noes: None
Absent: None
Motion for report It was moved by Councilman Scott and seconded by Mayor Hyde
in one year that this particular ordinance come back to the Council in
one year with a report on any problems that may or may not
have come up, both as to implementation and specifically
as to the language ambiguity.
Addition to motion City Attorney Lindberg suggested further language that "if
during the course of the year there is difficulty, that
this, being an administrative matter, would not require the
full hearings before the CommissiOn and the Council hut
could be brought back at any time."
Motion carried Councilman Scott included the Suggested language in his
motion, Mayor Hyde agreed to the second and the motion
carried unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Councilman Gillow and seconded by'Councilman
(Items 8 through 13) Cox that the Consent Calendar be approved and adopted.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 4 - May 22, 1979
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
Memorandum from Mayor Hyde referred to a memorandum received this evening
City Attorney from the City Attorney regarding Item 9 on the Consent
Calendar and offered Councilmembers an opportunity to
review it before voting on tim motion.
Mr. Lindberg explained that Item 9 was in reference to
Chula Vista Tract No. 79-14 (Town Centre - Townsite Tract
No. 1) and said there are certain matters still remaining
to be resolved; however, approval this evening will allow
the City to move forward and rectify any discrepancies that
may exist and the recorded copy will fully comply with all
of the ordinance requirements.
Consent Calendar adopted The motion to approve and adopt the Consent Calendar
carried unanimously.
8. RESOLUTION NO, 9S97 On May 11, 1979 David B. Richardson executed an easement
ACCEPTING EASEMENT FROM granting to the City a parcel of land having an area of
DAVID B. RICHARDSON FOR 1S3~ square feet, which is necessary to provide a sidewalk
STREET PURPOSES AND along the proposed cul-de-sac at the northerly end of Walnut
DEDICATING AND NAMING A Avenue. The road improvements will be constructed under
PORTION AS WALNUT AVENUE the 1911 Act proceedings.
9. RESOLUTION NO. 9S98 The Final Map for Chula Vista Tract No. 79-14 (Town Centre-
APPROVING FINAL MAP AND Townsite Tract No. 1) has been checked by the Engineering
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT Department and found to be in conformity with the Tentative
AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA Map approved by Resolution No. 9463. The map includes the
TRACT NO. 79-14 - TOWN dedication of a portion of Fourth Avenue,
CENTRE TOWNSITE TRACT
NO. 1
The agreement provides for the installation of public
improvements. Staff recommended the approval of the final
map be conditioned upon submittal of fees, bonds and required
assurances from the School Districts and the Sweetwater
Authority within a 60-day period.
10. RESOLUTION NO. 9S99 A trial traffic regulation has been in effect for eight
ESTABLISHING NO PARKING months: Schedule III - Parking Prohibited at All Times on
ZONES ON EAST "L" STREET East "L" Street beginning at a point 120 feet west of
Monserate Avenue and ending at Monterey Court on both sides.
Installation of left turn lanes on East "L" Street necessi-
tated the removal of on-street parking in this area.
11. RESOLUTION N0. 9600 A trial traffic regulation has been in effect for eight
ESTABLISHING STOP SIGNS months: Schedule II - Special Stops required at Crest
ON DOUGLAS STREET AT Drive/Douglas Street with traffic stopped on Douglas Street
HALECREST AND CREST DRIVES (2 signs), and at Halecrest Drive/Douglas Street with traffic
stopped on Douglas Street C1 sign). It was recommended that
the regulations be made permanent.
12. RESOLUTION NO. 9601 Ms. Harriett R. Stone submitted a request to vacate a segment
DECLARING THE INTENTION of Madison Avenue running southerly 290 feet from "H" Street.
OF THE COUNCIL TO VACATE She owns all properties on the east and west sides of the
PUBLIC STREET (MADISON subject street and is planning to renovate the properties
AVENUE SOUTH OF "H" STREET) adjacent to Madison Avenue, using the vacated portion for
AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE additional parking and landscaping. Staff recommended June
FOR A PUBLIC HEARING THEREON 12, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers be set as the
date and place for the public hearing.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 5 - May 22, 1979
CONSENT CALENDAR (Cont.)
13. RESOLUTION NO. 9602 This resolution memorializes the action of the Council on
AN~NDING THE GENERAL May 16, 1979 to change the General Plan for a three acre
PLAN FROM HIGH DENSITY area at the southeast corner of Bonita Road and Otay Lakes
RESIDENTIAL TO RETAIL Road.
COM~{RCIAL FOR A THREE
ACRE AREA AT THE SOUTH-
EAST CORNER OF BONITA
ROAD AND OTAY LAKES ROAD
(END OF CONSENT CALENDAR)
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
14. RESOLUTION NO. 9603 The contract for the installation of the street lights on
GRANTING A 16-DAY Third Avenue ("G" to "H" and "I" to"K") was awarded to
EXTENSION FOR THE Perry Electric, with a completion date of May 23, .1979. A
INSTALLATION OF STREET request was received for a time extension on this project
LIGHTS ON THIRD AVENUE - due to a delay in the receipt of the luminaires. Documen-
"G" TO "H" AND "I" TO tation of the delay from General Electric has been received
"K" STREETS by staff. It was recommended that a 16-day extension be
granted with the project to be completed by June 8, 1979. -
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
15. RESOLUTION N0. 9604 The contract for traffic signal improvements at Broadway/
GRANTING A 15-DAY "L" Street was awarded to Arrow Electric, with the project
EXTENSION FOR THE CONTRACT to be finished by May 27, 1979. The contractor requested
TO INSTALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL an extension due to a delay in receipt of the signal poles,
IMPROVEMENTS AT BROADWAY/ which has been confirmed by the manufacturer. Staff recom-
"L" STREET mended that a 15-day extension be granted wi'th the project
to be completed by 3une 11, 1979.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, pas~ed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott
· Noes: None
Absent: None
16a. RESOLUTION NO. 9605 By Resolution No. 9399 the Council accepted a petition for
ADOPTING DISTRICT BOUNDARY street improvements in the 1100 block of Walnut Avenue
MAP OF THAT CERTAIN AS- and directed the City Engineer to proceed with the formation
SESSMENT DISTRICT KNOWN of an Improvement Act Assessment District. Section 3110 of
AS THE WALNUT AVENUE 1911 the Streets and Highways Code requires that a resolution be
ACT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT - adopted describing the proposed boundaries of the district,
FROM 192 FEET NORTHERLY which shall be by reference to the map of the assessment
OF PALOMAR STREET TO 735.5 district, and such map shall govern all details as to the
FEET NORTHERLY extent of such district.
Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of'the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: None
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 6- May 22, la7~
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (Cont.l
16b. RESOLUTION NO. 9606 Staff prepared preliminary plans and cost estilaate for this
APPROVING PLANS, SPECIFI- project and held a meeting on Ma~chl2, 1979 with the area
CATIONS, AND COST ESTIMATE residents who accepted the proposed improvement plan,
FOR THAT CERTAIN ASSESSMENT subject to minor corrections which have since been incorpO-
DISTRICT KNOWN AS THE rated in the plan. The improvements to be installed include
WALNUT AVENUE 1911 ACT AS- curb, gutter, sidewalk, driveways, street paving, sewer
SESSMENT DISTRICT - FROM facilities, street light and relocation of water facilities.
192 FEET NORTHERLY OF Total project cost, including incidentals, is estimated at
PALOMAR STREET TO 735.5 $98,028.
FEET NORTHERLY
No provision for In reply to a query from Mayor Hyde concerning provisions
street trees for street trees, City Engineer Lippitt stated sinCe this
is an industrial subdivision, no provisions have been made
for street trees as the easements for trees required behind
the right of way are not normally used in 1911 Act Districts.
Council discussion Council discussion ensued and it was determined that the
cost of street trees would be minimal and they could be
included.
Petition signed by In answer 'to questiQns from the Council concerning objection~
70% of property owners from residents, City Engineer Lippitt reported that a pe-
tition is on file signed by 70% of the' property owners in
the district by area. -
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
waived by,unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: None
16c. RESOLUTION NO. 9607 The Streets and Highways Code requires that the Council
GIVING NOTICE OF INTENTION adopt a Resolution of Intention before ordering any work
AND ORDERING CERTAIN WORK to be done under the Improvement Act of 1911. Properties
TO BE DONE AND IMPROVEMENTS within the District will be assessed equitably according to
TO BE MADE UNDER THE PRO- benefits received. The resolution sets the date of June
VISIONS OF THE IMPROVEMENT 12, 1979 at 7:00 p.m. for the public hearing. Any protests
ACT OF 1911 AND AMENDMENTS from affected property owners must be in writing and must
THERETO IN THE 1100 BLOCK be delivered to the City ~lerk prior to the time of the
OF WALNUT AVENUE FROM 192 meeting.
FEET NORTHERLY OF PALOMAR
STREET TO 735.5 FEET
NORTHERLY AND SETTING DATE
OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE
FORMATION OF THE DISTRICT
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: None
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 7 - May 22, 1979
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (Cent.)
17. RESOLUTION NO. 9608 City and County staffs have prepared an agreement to con-
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN tinue the Chula Vista Transit operation (parts of Routes
THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND 5 and 7) in unincorporated County areas and for the County
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR to reimburse the City for the cost of these services for
TRANSIT SERVICES FOR FY 79- the Fiscal Year 1979-80. The revised agreement accounts
80 AND AMENDING CITY FY 80 for increased costs and updated patronage/revenue date.
LTF CLAIM AN ADDITIONAL The general basis of service and reimbursement is the same
$62,660 TO $869,660 as the previously approved agreements.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott, Cox
Noes: None
Absent: None
18. RESOLUTION NO. 9609 During the construction of Third Avenue street improvements
APPROVING TEMPORARY the contractor proposes to close Davidson Street from the
CLOSING OF DAVIDSON alleys east and west of Third Avenue to construct the
STREET BETWEEN THIRD crosswalks in the intersection of Davidson at one time. He
AVENUE AND ALLEYS LYING requested the closing-of Davidson Street for a period of
EAST AND WEST OF THIRD three weeks between May 29 arid June t8, '197g and has agreed
AVENUE to provide approximately 52 parking spaces on the east side
of Third Avenue during this time. Staff recommended
proval of the closur~ as being the least disruptive to
businesses and traffic.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Bgdahl, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
foilowing vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gitlow, Scott, COx
Noes: None
Absent: None
19. RESOLUTION NO. 9610 At the preliminary hudget session on Saturday, May ~2, 1979
PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT the City Council directed that an appropriate resolution be
TO THE MAYOR FOR THE DEMANDS prepared increasing the reimbursement to the Mayor for out-
AND EXPENSES MADE UPON of-pocket expenses from $150 to $3Q0.
AND INCURRED BY HIM IN
SERVING AS MAYOR
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Egdahl, the reading ofthe text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
foliowing vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott, Cox
Noes: None
Absent: None
20. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING In a written statement to the Council, DireCtor of Planning
AN INTERIM ORDINANCE LIST- Peterson said, due to different requirements of senior
ING HIGH DENSITY HOUSING citizens, the various provisions of the zoning ordinance
PROJECTS FOR SENIOR CITIZENS pertaining to such things as density, offstreet parking,
AS tINCLASSIFIED USES minimum unit size, etc. are not really appropriate for
senior citizen developments. From a procedural standpoint,
the conditional use permit process is superior because of
the findings required to approve a variance. The amendment
to Chapter 19.54 will allow the CUP process for senior
citizen housing developments. Full consideration of the
ordinance by the Planning Commission and City Council, with
public hearings will follow within 90 days.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 8 - May 22, 1979
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING (Cont.)
Discussion of different Councilman Egdahl asked for justification of the statements
requirements for senior that requirements of senior citizens differ from those of
citizens families or younger persons.
In response, Director of Planning Peterson commented on
surveys indicating ~ewer number of automobiles required and
smaller living units preferred in many areas. Also, in
two senior citizen projects in the City, there are devi-
ations in off-street parking and size of dwelling units.
Need for interim In reply to a question from Councilman Scott as to why the
ordinance need for an interim ordinance, Mr. Peterson explained that
there is a pending proposal for a senior citizen develop-
ment across from the Civic Center which could be bandied
more appropriately by a conditional use permit than through
the variance procedure.
Council discussion Council discussion ensued with staff concerning various
aspects of senior citizen housing areas, including parking
requirements, lack of public transportation in Southern
California, definition of senior citizen developments with
age criteria and income limitations; and concern that these
significant matters will not be coming before the Council
for approval.
Suggestion to amend City Attorney Lindberg stated the ordinance can be amended
ordinance to require that these conditional use permits, during the
interim period, would come to the COuncil for approval.
Item 20 and 20a to be It was the concurrence Of the Council: ~hat t-his item be
considered later on the trailed to give the City Attorney an opportunity to draft
agenda appropriate wording to amend the ordinance.
20-A. RESOLUTION NO. 9611 The City Charter requires that a public hearing be set to
SETTING A PUBLIC provide for citizen conunent on the fiscal 1979-80 budget,
HEARING TO CONSIDER including the setting of employee salaries. The resolution
FY 1979-80 BUDGET sets the date of June 19, 1979 for th~ public hearing.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: None
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
21. RESOLUTION NO. 9612 At the meeting of May 8, 1979 the Council continued this
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH resolution until after budget hearings. The Council has
DONALD R. GOLDMAN AND previously approved modified Alternative 4 for the renovatic
ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS, of City Hall and staff has negotiated with Mr. Goldman to
FOR RENOVATION OF CITY provide the architectural services required. He submitted
HALL AND AUTHORIZING a proposal to accomplish the project for a fee of $47,000.
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS Staff recommended that the agreement with Mr. Goldman be
(Continued from 5/8/79) approved and that the expenditure of $51,700 be authorized
from RS17 ($47,000 plus 10% contingencies).
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 9 - May 22, 1979
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (Cent.)
In response to a query from Councilman Egdahl as to the
rationale for the Architect's fee of $47,000, Deputy City
Manager Robens said this was based on a review of the hours
to be spent on the project negotiated with the Architect
on an item by item basis; and also the fee is at the low
end of the "curve" of fees issued by the American Institute
of Architects.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Scott, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted by the
following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: None
20. CONSIDERATION OF Mayor Hyde read the following wording suggested by the
INTERIM ORDINANCE City Attorney as an amendment to the Interi3a Ordinance -
LISTING HIGH DENSITY an additional sentence under Sec. 19.58.390: "providing
HOUSING PROJECTS FOR further that during the effective term of this ordinance,
SENIOR CITIZENS AS as an interim ordinance, all applications shall be subject
UNCLASSIFIED USES to review and approval of both the Planning Commission
(Continued from earlier and City Council."
discussion)
Motion to amend It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow
proposed ordinance and unanimously carried that the proposed ordinance be
amended to include the language suggested by the City
Attorney.
20a. ORDINANCE NO. 1869 It was moved by Councilman Gillow, that this ordinance, as
AMENDING CHAPTERS 19.54 amended, be placed on first reading and adopted, and that
AND 19.58 OF THE CITY the reading of the text be waived by unanimous consent.
CODE TO ALLOW SENIOR The motion carried by the foliowing vote, to-wit:
CITIZENS' HOUSING
DEVELOPMENTS AS AYES: Councilmen Gillow, Scott, Cox, Egdahl, Hyde
CONDITIONAL USES AND Noes: None
PROVIDE FOR MODIFICATIONS Absent: None
TO THE NORMAL REQUIREMENTS
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR
SUCH DEVELOPMENTS -
FIRST READING AND ADOPTION
22. RESOLUTION NO. 9613 On April 24, 1979 the Council asked that the Town Centre
AUTHORIZING THE INCREASE Project Area Committee and the Town Centre BuSiness and
IN PARKING METER RATES FOR Professional Association be contacted for their consideratie
ON-STREET PANKING METERS and comment regarding increased meter rates. Letters were
ON THIRD AVENUE AND ADJACENT submitted from both organizations indicating the Parking
SIDE STREETS (Continued Place Commission's recommendation is in order and should be
from 4/24/79) approve&
Meters can be adjusted In a written statement, Director of Finance Grant, respond-
for use of pennies ing to a request from the CounCil, reported that the meters
can be adjusted to allow 6 minutes parking per penny with
minimal additional cost.
Amendment to resolution It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman Scott
and unanimously carried that the resolution be amended to
allow for one cent (1~) parking for six (6) minutes.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 10 - May 22, 1979
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Resolution offered, Offered by Councilman Cox, as amended, the reading of the
as amended text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and adopted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow, Scott
Noes: None
Absent: None
22-A. RESOLUTION NO. 9614 This item was presented as a Unanimous Consent item at the
APPROVING AGREEMENT meeting of May 17, 1979 and by Council action it was con-
BETWEEN THE CITY AND tinued to this evening's meeting. The agreement was re-
JLEN, INC. (Continued vised to include a requirement for security for any con-
from 5/17/79) struction revisions as determined by th'e Deputy City Manager
and ultimately by the Council. There is also a re-
quirement that the developer reimburse the City for any
costs involved in the inspection processes authorized by
the agreement. Staff recommended approval of the resolution.
Concern with designation Mayor Hyde expressed concern with the reference in the
of Deputy City Manager Agreement to the "Deputy City Manager," especially in
in Agreement connection with the approval of the security to be posted
with the City. He felt this should more appropriately be
designated as the "City Manager." '~
Discussion of discrepancies In response to questions from the Council, Deputy City
Manager Robens described the basic areas under dispute,
including grading, units and slopes. He said that there .
are no hazards or problems at this tinre with certain
portions of the project, although they are not in con-
formance with the plan.
Council discussion Council discussion ensued concerning the various discrepan-
cies - the grading, drainage, slopes, and pads; the retain-
ing wall to be installed; discretions m the part of developer
beyond those normally allowed; separate inspection process
for grading and buildings; and portions of the project that
are satisfactory to staff.
Jack Mann, Attorney Mr. Mann said that the developer acknowledges certain parts
225 Broadway #1720 of the project are not in compliance with the specific plan
San Diego CA 92101 approved by the Council originally. He stated there have
(Representing JLEN, Inc.) been no inspections due to the problems for over three
months and the developer is incurring a monthly interest
obligation in excess of $32,000, which is creating a
hardship. He outlined the benefits of the project and said
his client approves of the agreement and will comply with
the wishes of the Council.
Mr. Mann said they had a question on Paragraph 5 under
"JLEN'S OBLIGATIONS," as it is his understanding that
reimbursement is to be for "extraordinary" expenses. He
asked if this sentence could be amended accordingly.
Amendment to agreement It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl
deleting "Deputy City and unanimously carried that the agreement be amended under
Manager" "JLEN'S OBLIGATIONS," paragraph 3, to strike ~he word
"Deputy" (wording to read "approval of the City Manager and
the City Attorney").
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 11 - May 22, 1~7~
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES (Cont.)
Addition to paragraph 5, It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow
page 2 of the agreement and unanimously carried that under paragraph S, page 2,
the word "extraordinary" be added to the second sentence
between the words "all" and "expenses."
City Manager's In answer to a question from the Council as to a specific
recommendation recommendation of the City Manager, Mr. Cole said the reasm
for the agreement is to show the Council's willingness not
to be an obstructionist, but for the City to be part of the
solution; and while the role of the City is slight, the
agreement will protect the City for the period indicated;
but it does not preclude the developer from taking some
legal action against the City for some action taken prior
to or after the period of the agreement. He said his
recommendation is to approve the agreement.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent.
In answer to a query from Councilman Scott, City Attorney
Lindberg said that the agreement will allow the project to
go forward, but there is no approval at this time of any
modification of the precise plan.
Speaking against resolution Councilman Scott spoke against the resolution stating that
is an extraordinary action that could more appropriately
be handled at the public hearing on June 12, 1979.
Resolution adopted The resolution was passed and adopted by the foilowing
vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: Councilmen Egdahl, Scott
Absent: None
23. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. REQUEST FOR IMPROVEMENT Mrs. Polis requested that the City clean and improve a
OF WALKWAY - NORTHERN walkway at the northern end of Rutgers Avenue which is used
END OF RUTGERS AVENUE by children for access to Tiffany School and Elmburst Park.
AT GOTHAM STREET - The Council continued this matter until tonight's meeting
JILL POLIS, CHULA VISTA for a report from the City Manager.
(Continued from 5'/15/79)
a(1). REPORT ON REQUEST FOR In a written statement, Mr. Cole reported that according to
IMPROVEMENT OF WALKWAY Fire Chief Longerhone, the weed abatement provisions of the
Code do no apply to "wild areas," but are used to eliminate
fire hazards on vacant lots located in developed areas;
therefore, the City is consistent in the application of the
policy in not clearing weeds from the right of way for the
future extension of Rutgets Avenue. Debris and standing
water within the dedicated portion of Rutgets Avenue will
be cleaned up by City staff.
Recommendation of Mr. Cole reiterated his reconkmendation to make no imprpveme
City Manager in the walkway based on the fact that the City would theret
assume responsibility for on-going maintenance.
Motion to accept report - It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow
City Manager to respond and unanimously carried that the report be accepted and the
to Mrs. Polls City Manager be requested to respond accordingly to Mrs.
Polls.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 12 - May 22, 1979
REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER (Cent.)
Motion for letter It was moved by Councilman Gillow, seconded by Councilman
to property owner Scott and unanimously carried that a letter be sent to
the property owner indicating the Council has had a com-
plaint from citizens and ask if the owner will clean up
the debris and weeds.
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
24. CONSIDERATION OF STORAGE On April 17, 1979 the Council asked staff to develop more
REQUIRE~NTS FOR precise standards for the location of private storage area~
CONDOMINIUMS in condominium developments. Because of the many variabte~
involved in this matter, in a written report, the Director
of Planning concluded the ordinance should set forth the
basic requirementS, but the details should be adopted by
resolution so there is some flexibility in applying them.
A detailed ordinance amendment and policy prepared and
staff recommended they be referred to the Planning Commiss~
for report and recommendation.
Storage allowance for Mayor Hyde questioned the storage of 100 cu. feet for a
studio apartments questioned "no" bedroom or studio apartment. He stated that a
bedroom normally will provide some storage capacity and
100 cu. feet of storage allowance may not be sufficient.
Motion to increase It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Gillow
requirement for storage and unanimously carried that for a "no" bedroom unit that
in studio apartments there be a requirement of iS0 cu. feet.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman
and refer to Planning Gillow and unanimously carried that the report be accepted
Commission as amended, and forwarded to the Planning Commission for
their recommendation.
2S. REPORT ON STAFF In a written report, Deputy City Manager Robens recommende
RECONE~ENDATIONS OF CHULA that Chula Vista Transit fares be increased five cents,
VISTA TRANSIT FARE effective July 2, 1979, with the fare structure as follows
INCREASE, EFFECTIVE Adult - 40¢; Juniors (High School Seniors and under) - 20¢
JULY 2, 1979 Seniors (Over 60) - 20~; Handicapped - 20¢; and Route 6
Downtowner - 10¢. The current transfer and pass policy
was recommended to be maintained in FY 1980 and it was ale
recommended that a reciprocal free transfer arrangement be
implemented with the new National City Transit System,
effective July 2, 1979.
Motion to accept It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded by Councilman
staff recommendation Scott and unanimously carried that the staff recommendatio
be accepted.
26. REPORT ON CHULA VISTA Staff is in the process of meeting with Aztec Bus Lines to
TRANSIT SCHEDULE CHANGES review costs under the current two-year contract which
FOR FY1979-80 expires in July 1980. Staff requested Council approval of
the following schedule changes to be incorporated into the
negotiated contract to'be effective July 2, 1979:
1. Route 1 - It was recommended that service on Route 1 b
increased from once an hour to once every half hour du
weekdays between the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.
Hourly service would be maintained during weekday even
and on Saturdays.
2. It was recommended that Route 1 be extended to serve t
Oleander Avenue area between Orange Avenue and Otay Va
Road during the evening hours (7-10 p.m.), Monday
through Saturday upon request only.
3. Route 7 - It was recommended that evening service be
eliminated on Route 7 (7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.) This
a relatively new route and service modifications are
necessary in order to maximize its productivity and ef
ficiency.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 13 - May 22, 1979
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS (Cont.)
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman
Egdahl and unanimously carried that the report be accepted.
27. REPORT ON REQUEST FOR A request for a four-way stop at East Palomar Street/Monserat
FOUR-WAY STOP AT EAST Avenue was received from Jack Juarez, 202 E. Palomar, and
PALOMAR STREET/MONSBRATE referred by Council to the Safety Commission and staff. In
AVENUE a written statement, the City Engineer reported that since
the two-way stop was installed, traffic volumes have increase
on East Palomar Street and today there are 22S0 ADT, while
on Monserate there are only 1410 ADT (average daily trips).
On the warrant system for a four-way stop, this intersection
had only 8 points, where the minimum requirement is30 point~
The Safety Commission and staff recommended the stop signs
at East Palomar Street/Monserate Avenue be changed to stop
traffic only on Monserate Avenue.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded-by Mayor Hyde and
unanimously carried that the staff report be accepted.
28. REPORT ON REQUEST FOR In January 1979 the Council received a petition from Gladys
ENFORCEMENT OF 2S MPH North, 1SS2 Oleander Avenue, asking for (1) enforcement of
SPEED LIMIT IN THE 1S00 a 2S MEH speed limit in the 1500 block of Oleander Avenue;
BLOCK OF OLEANDER AVENUE and (2) an extension of East Orange Avenue east to Brandywin{
AND THE EXTENSION OF EAST Avenue.
ORANGE AVENUE TO BRANDYWINE
AVENUE
The City Engineer presented an in-depth report and concluded
with the recommendation that the Council consider extension
of East Orange Avenue in the 1981-82 CIP, if not constructed
by private development; and to request the Police Department
to conduct periodic enforcement of the 25 MPH speed limit.
The Safety Commission concurred.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde and
unanimously carried that the staff report be accepted.
Mr. Juarez and Mrs. North Mayor Hyde asked that both Mr. Juarez and Mrs. North be
to be advised of Council advised of the Council action on Items 27 and 28 respective-
action ly.
29. REPORT ON REQUEST FOR A petition was received from Thaddeus Chotain, S?S Mclntosh,
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT requesting the installation of a traffic signal on Broadway
BROADWAY/MclNTOSH STREET at Mclntosh Street. In a written report, the City Engineer
said staff conducted a study to determine if a signal was
warranted at this location, but the traffic data did not
satisfy the signal criteria used by the City.
It was staff's recommendation to (1) remove existing cross-
walks on Broadway at Mclntosh Street and Casselman Street;
(2) install new crosswalk with advance warning signs and
markings at Chula Vista Street; and(3) improve street
lighting by replacing existing 16-foot mast arms at Broadway
Chula Vista Street. The Safety Commission concurred.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded By Councilman
Gillow and unanimously carried that the report be accepted.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 14 - May 22,197~
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS (Cont.)
30. STATUS REPORT ON On April 17, 1fl79 the Council requested additional informatic
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE concerning the bidding process for the Open Space District
Maintenance Contract. Director of Parks and Recreation Hall
submitted a copy of the bid proposal and in a written
report explained: (1) it has been subdivided into a number
of units to provide cost information on various sections
of the larger districts; (2) changes have been made to
clearly describe the different areas and the extent of
the maintenance required; (3) with the aid of the Homeowners
Association in Open Space District No, 3, maintenance
requirements for certain sections were changed to improve
maintenance efficiency; and (4) new plats clearly show the
areas prepared for the bid package.
With the aid of a colored map, Mr. Hall described the
maintenance areas, slopes, tree and shrub plantings used
for "fire" breaks, and maintenance of the natural ground
coverings.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman
Egdahl and unanimously carried that the report be accepted.
REPORTS, REQUESTS AND RECOb~MENDATIONS OF CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
31. REPORT ON THE ENVIRONb~NTAL On January 16, 1979 the Council referred the question of
IMPACT OF DRIVE-THROUGH the environmental impact of drive-through facilities to
FACILITIES the Environmental Control Commission for report and comment.
After extensive review and discussion, the Commission sub-
mitted a written report stating it was difficult to draw
definitive conclusions on the direct measurable impact of
these facilities. They found that r~s~arch on this subject
is relatively non-existent and the little data collected
is inconclusive. The Commission, after studying the available
materiaL, offered several Sununary statements in their report.
Staff reported they cannot support total prohibitions of
drive-up facilities without it being shown that such problems
as air pollution or other energy factors are of overriding
importance, and recommended that continued approval of drive-
up facilities be made or denied by evaluation of all factors.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by Councilman
Gillow and unanimously carried that this report be accepted.
32. RECOMMENDATION TO APPROVE The Historical Site Board submitted a proof and recommended
THE "CHULA VISTA BOOKLET that the Booklet of Historic Sites be approved. The Chula
OF HISTORIC SITES'i Vista Star News will be printing the booklet at a cost of
$S00 for approximately 1,000 copies.
The Historical Site Register was adopted by the Historical
Site Board in accordance with Ordinance No. 1573. A copy
was submitted to the Council for information.
Motion to approve project It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Scott and
unanimously carried that the project be approved as submitted;
Suggestion for substitute Councilman Cox offered a suggestion that in the Historical
picture - Historic Site #6 Site Register a substitute picture be provided - without a
car - for the Johnson House (Site No. 6), so no detraction
is made from the historic value of the building.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Concern regarding relocation Mayor Hyde said he met with representatives from Imperial
of Lindbergh Field Beach and National City after the CPO meeting on Monday to
discuss strategies for the South Bay with regard to the
potential election concerning the relocation of the Lindbergh
airport.
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. - 15 - May 22, 1979
MAYOR'S REPORT
Motion for staff to meet It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Gillow
with South Bay Cities re that the City Manager make contact with the Managers of
opposition to relocation National City, Imperial Beach and Coronado for the purpose
of San Diego airport of coordinating plans to insure that the South Bay cities'
opposition to relocation of the San Diego International
Airport to the South Bay is opposed with all possible
effectiveness.
Speaking against election Councilman Scott spoke against having an election conducted.
He suggested it would be more appropriate for the four
members from the South Bay to organize and get enbugh votes
to reverse the decision to hold an election - wher~ citizens
are given inadequate facts to vote on an issue.
Mayor Hyde concurred with Councilman Scott's statements, but
added it would be well to make sure, if there is an election',
that the South Bay's interests are defended.
Motion carried The motion for the City Manager to meet with the Managers of
the South Bay cities carried unanimously.
Report to come back the Mayor Hyde asked that a report come back on this matter the
first week of July first week of July, 1979 - a status report.
Consideration of having Mayor Hyde said $60,000 has been budgeted for visitor pro-
the ad hoc Visitor Industry motion and it was indicated the Visitor Industry Advisory
Committee made permanent Committee be made a permanent body, rather than an ad hoc
committee.
Councilman Gillow suggested this be postponed until after
the Committee meets with the consultant and can make a
recommendation. He said a report will be coming to the
Council.
Suggestion for Commission Mayor Hyde referred to the modifications made to the schedul,
to serve as Transit Advisory of the Chula Vista Transit System. He said the City may hay,
Board reached a point where it would be useful to have a transit
system advisory board and suggested that this be made a
charge to one of the existing Boards - the Human Relations
Commission or Safety Commission.
The Council concurred and Councilman Scott suggested the
Human Relations Commission would be the appropriate Commissi
Letter to be sent to Mayor Hyde stated he will address a letter to the Human
Human Relations Commission Relations Commission indicating the Council is interested in
having this function performed and get their reaction on
accepting the charge.
No agreement reached on Mayor'Hyde reported he artended a meeting with staff and
contract for fire service representatives of the Bonita-.Sunnyside Fire protection
between City and 'Sunnyaide District, but no agreement was reached on the contract for
Fire Protection District fire service for next year. New proposals will be drafted
to clarify the position of each agency.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
CPO presentation on Councilman Cox referred to the cancellation of the Council
crime statistics Conference scheduled for Thursday, May 24, and the request
of Mr. Scott Green of CPO to make his presentation, showing
crime statistics for the San Diego region, to the Council
at the regular meeting of June 5, 1979.
Held Tuesday- 7:00 p.m. - 16 - May 22, 1979
COLFNCIL C05~MRNTS (Cont.)
Motion to approve It was moved by Councilman COX, seconded by Mayor Hyde and
presentation on June S hmanimouSlF carried that Mr. Green's request he approved.
Objection Withdrawn to Councilman Gillow said he retracted b_is Opposition to the
designation: .of "City Hall" letters "City Hall" on the Ci~.ic Center complex'building.
Coastal Commission decision Councilman Scott referred to the :hackground information
received in the Council packets'Concerning the decision of
the Coastal Commlss~on. He Suggested this matter be dis-
cussed and determin~ the poSition the Council should take
' at the State COastal Comamtsslon meeting %n June.
Motion todiscuss decision It was moved by Councilman Scott, seconded by ~ayor .Hyde
at Redevelopment Agency and tmanimously carried tha~ this matter 5e schedui~d
meeting on 6/7/79 the Redevelopment meeting 0n J~tne 7, 19_7gl
Request to be absent Councilman ScOtt asked permission tO he absent from the
from meetings first two Council meetings and tlie Redevel0pment Agency
meeting in June. H.e Will return from vacation on June
Motion to approve request It was moved h}t MayOr ~yde, seconded hy Councilman cox and
unanimously carried that Coun~ilman Scott ~s request be
approved. - - ,
Motion to reschedule It was moved hy Mayor Hyde~ secondled by Councilman Gillow'
discussion Of Coastal and unanimously carried that thel pre~ious motion on the
Commission decision decision of the Coastal CommisSfon ~e reconsidered; and
discussion of the Council position before the State Coastal
Commission be scheduled ~or the first Council meeting after
Councilman Scott returns from~ his vacation.
Proposed adjustment for Councilman Egdahl made reference to a memorandum from the .
compensation to Councilmen City Attorney regarding adjustment tO compensation for
Councilmen from July through D~cember., 1979 and then on an
annual basis.
Motion for appropriate It was moved hy Mayo.'~ Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl .
ordinance to be prepared and unanimously carried that an appropriate ordinance be
brought back (in accordance with the City Attorney's memo-'
55. DISCUSSION OF~}E~4DING This item was placed on the agenda in accordance with CDtmCil
ITEMS . .,,direction given .at. the meeting of May 8, 1979.
Motion to continue It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by councilman Scott
Item 53 until 6/5/79 unanimously carried that this item be continued until the'
meeting of June 5, 1979
. Mayor Hyde out of City Mayor Hyde announced-he Wili be OUt Of the City starting May
24 and returning on June 3, 1979. Mayor Pro Tempore Cox
- . will be presiding during this time.
A~JOURNM~qT Mayor Hyde adjourned the' meeting at 9i30 p.m. to ~e ~egularm~r
al Tue'sd{ Ju~e h,'1979 at ?;00 p.m. in the Council Chambers,
276 Fourth Avenue.
,/"',,: DEPUTY CITY CLERK