HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1978/07/11
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday - 7:00 p.m. July 11, 1978
A ,regular meeting of the City CoUncil of the City of Chula Vista, CalifoTnia, was held On
the above date beginning at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 276 Fourth Aventle.
ROLL CALL
Councilmen present: Mayor Hyde" Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Gillow
Councilmen ab;ent: Councilman Scott
Staff present: City Manager Cole, City Attorney Lindberg, Director of Planning
Peterson, Director of Public 'Works ,Robens, Assistant Director of
Planning Williams, Assistant Director of Public Works Lippitt,
Director of Finance Grant, ,Directür of Parks and Recreation Hall,
Fire Chief Longerbç>ne, Assistant City Attorney Harron, Deputy City
Manager Wittenberg
The pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Hyde followed by a moment of silent
prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES ¡twas moved by Councilman Egdahl, seconded by Mayor Hyde
and unanimously carried by those present 'that the minutes
of the mee'tìngs of June 29 and J.uly 5,1978 be'approved,
copies having been sent to each Councilman.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a. OATH OF OFFICE - Deputy City Clerk Jane Diedrichs administered the Oath of
CHARLES H. WENDORF Office to Charles Henry Wendorf, recently appointed to the
Environmental êontròl CommissionjHistoricalSite,Board.
Motion to consider It was moved by Mayor Hyde, s,econded by Councilman Egdáhl
Item 22 at this time and unanimously carried by those present that Item 22 On
the Agenda be advanced and considered at this time.
22. REPORT - STAFF In answer to Council's directive for recommendation on
RECOMMENDATION QN MTDB's proposal, Director of Public Works Robens submitted
MTDB EARLY GUIDEWAY a written report on July 5, 1978'contluding that the light
IMPLEMENTATION rail system would have a detrimental effect on the City's
(Continued from economy and on present and potential commuting trips. It
July 5, 1978) was recommended that the Council oppose this construction.
This item was continued until tonight's agenda to give
representatives from Metropolitan Transit Development
Board (MTDB) an opportunity to provide City staff with
more information and clarify any questions.
Bob Nelson, Executive Mr. Nelson said that the light rail transit program is
Manager, Metropolitan designed to carry 4 1/2, to'S million more people for less
Transit Development money and is only one element of the improved system recom-
Board mended. He described the policy objective of MTDB to expand
an improved transit prógram for the entire region and said
the system would improve access to Chula Vista shopping
center.
He commented on the fare structure, cost factors, percentage
of residents in Chula Vista who would use the system to
commute, the feeder bus system (J4'buses per hour) to the
"H" Street station, decrease in travel time, projected
increased traffic congestion in the South Bay area, and
the necessity for a regional transportation system.
-, "--'--"--~----'-
City Council Meiiting , -2-
Council discussion Council discussion followed concerning the benefits <tci
Chula Vista; economic conce~s,depeI).dence or American!!
on automobiles, paTkingp,roÐiems at various industries
where Chura Vista re$i,dents are emplqyerl, increasEidcost.
toO users,pøssibility .of increased competition Ö,f outSide
shopping centers if light railtÎ'a,nslt:':is ileveJo¡)ed,'and
the acquisition and opó>Î'ational cöst,O':f the light rail'
system. '
'Staff recömmendation In response to a query :from May~~ Hyde, ,Director of PUb'ac
Works Robens said that staff had Î'e1iiew~d the studies mad~
by 1\1TÖB and Still had concerns regardingtheimpaCtoI). ,the
Chilla Vista economy if the system is developed;llowever, ,
in view of,the improved service to.Chula Vista, the impot-"
tanceof a regional system and of preserving ,the SD&AE
Railway, and future energy problems, he said staff would
recommend, on a marginal basis, that the Council approve
the implementation of the earlygùideway system.
, "
Motion to àdopt'a' It was mov"d> by Mayor 1;Jyde andsecol1.dedby CoUI).clln¡anGillo\o1
resolutioI).'endor~ing that theCO]Jncil adopt a resolution endorsing the develóp-
the light rail system ment of the light rail system,as P1':°pos~d to MTDB.
Speaking in 'favor Mayor Hyde outlined se\[eral points in support of the motion!.
'of motion future transportation planning on a regional basis is
crit,ical, solutions to transit problems will become more
expensive downstream, energypxoblems will increase and
air quality problems must be considered.
Speahng against'mot~on Councilman Cox expressed concerns that this is not the
time.. to make a commitment for ,a total light ,rail system
as there has been no public involv¡)¡ent, cost is significant,
and e'ffect on ,the City's economy is a concern.
Speaking in support Councilman Gillow spoke in favor of the'motion, coOmmenting
of the moti9I). that a long range transportation ¡;yst~m should be supported.
He suggested that the Chamber of Commerce could publicize
quick travel to Chula Vista to shop; that rapid transpor- ,
tation can 'be used to attract tourism to the City; and that
traffic jams ðn busy freeways may be an incentive for using
the system.
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vote, to-wÌ't:
AYES: Councilmen Gillow"Egdahl, Hyde
Noes: Councilman Cox
Absent: Councilman Scott
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mrs. Mabel M. Williams Ms. Williams spoke against the UtilityUsers,Tax, stating
276 Whitney Street it was not fair to the people. She said that when any
Chura Vista 92010 laws are'passed, the people should have the right ot vote
on the~. She presented a petition to the Council with 52
signatures opposing the tax.
Vince Davies, President Mr. Davies read a letter addressed to the Council from the
Chamber of Commerce Chamber of Commerce eXprèssing concerns with tax increases
used to balance the budget of the City, and that the business
license tax wa,snot' earmarked for the promotion of the
economic interest of the community. The Chamber requested
that the Council reconsider their actions and balance the
budget through means of reducing non-ess,ential C:i ty services.
The letter was p,resented to the Deputy City Clerk for the
record.
Citý Council Meeting -3- July 11 ,1978
Council to hold discus'sion Mayor Hyde said the utilization of business license fees
on any change of use of will be a subject for Council discussion if thEjTe is any
business license fees change.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. REQUEST FOR TRAFFIC Rios East Homeowners Association requested that safety
SIGNAL AT INTER- measures be taken to protect school ,children living in
SECTION OF OTAY the Playmor II Condominium Project whent'hey, crossOtay
VALLEY ROAD AND Valley Road to attend school.
MELROSE AVENUE -
RIOS EAST HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION
Motion to refer It was moved by Maýor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl
to staff and unanimously carried by those present that this matter
be referred to the staff for appropriate reply.
b. REQUEST FOR, RESTROOM Mr. and Mrs.H. W. Walsh asked that the, rest rooms at Rohi
FACILITIES AT ROHR Park beclea;ned and that additional facilities be installed,
PARK - H. W.WALSH suggesting that charge be made of $1 per car if necessary
to cover the cost.
Motion for staff to It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde and
prepare letter unanimously carried by ,those ,present that staff prepare a
reply for the Mayor's signature.,
c. WITHDRAWAL OF LaderaAssociates, Inc,., on "behal f of Richard Boucher,
PETITION TO ANNEX submi tted a letter rescinding, thr petition to annex
PROPERTY TO OPEN property to Open Space District No.4.
SPACE DISTRICT #4
Motion to refer to It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Egdahl
staff for reply and unanimously carried by those present that this be
referred to staff for appropriate reply.
d. REQUEST TO RECONSIDER A letter was received from Mr. J. M. Brennan requesting
THE ANNEXATION OF that the Council reconsider the action taken regarding
PROPERTY AT "F" STREET the annexation of the area at "F" Street and Hill top Drive
AND HILLTOP DRIVE - under the provisions of tile Municipal Organization Act of
J. M. BRENNAN 1977 (MORGA).
Motion for staff to It was moved by Mayor 'Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox
prepare letter for and unanimously carried by those present that this matter
Mayor's signature be referred to staff with direction to prepare a reply
wllich indicates that the Council will persist in the efforts
to annex this area - letter to be for the Mayor's signature.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORD1NANCES
5. PUBLIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
INTENT TO ACQUIRE AND opened the public hearing.
IMPROVE ADDITIONAL
PARKING LOTS WITHIN The City Council has authorized the acquisition of two
THE CHULA VISTA PARKING additional parking lots in Parking District No. 1. The
DISTRICT #1 (Continued ordinance adds to the parking lots two 'additional parcels
from 5/23 and 6/13/78) to be acquired and improved and the' resolution provide
for administrative handling of the acquisition and improve-
ments.
-~~--
City Council Meeting -4- Jul,y 11, 19.78
Items Sa, ,d..and e City Attorney Lindberg said that in regard to Items Sa, d,
deleted from the and e, that the method of financing will be chaI).neled through
agenda the redevelopment agen,cyproces,s rathér than through the
Parking District,"and the only items ,to be considered ,at
this time would be 5b and 5c c6hcerning the conilemnation
of properÜes. ,>
Tom Mòney Mr. Money commented that the acquisition of, these ldts for
35S Third Avenue additional parking has been before the Council 011 several
Chula Vista 92010 occasions and each time a study is made, the acquisi ti,on
(Chairman, Parking costs increase. He outlined the necessity for the additional'
Place Commission) lots and urged that the Council authorize acquisition of
the properties for parking lot purposes.
Letter received Mayor Hyde noted that a number of letters have beeI).,received
in opposition indicating opposition to this proj ect.
Ansel Watrous Mr. Watrous read a letter sent to the Council in protest
289 Church Street of the acquisition of his property. He reviewed past actions
Chula Vista aI).d activities concerning use of his property for' parking
lot, purposes, and re-affirmed his opposition to such acquisi-
tion.
Marjorie L. Rodriguez Ms. Rodriguez said she was against having her pròperty
Owner of property at taken for parking lot use, uI).less she was given a fair
281 Church Avenue market price for it. She said that the offer of $41,000
was not a fair market price in view of property costs today.
Public hearing closed There being no further comments, either foroI' against,
the public hearing was declared closed.
Concern in using Councilman Egdahl expressed concern regarding the use of
right of eminent the right of eminent domain to acquire this property. He
domain to acquire said that an overwhelming public need should be demonstrated
parking lots to use this legal means of acquiring property, and in this
instance such public need has not been demonstrated.
Mayor Hyde stated he concurreil with the Parking Place Com-
mission on the need and desirability of acquiring additional
property for parking demands, but also expressed concern
regarding the exercise of eminent domain for this purpose.
Motion to file Items 5b It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Egdahl
and 5c and continue that (1) that the City elect to not use the power of eminent
negotiations for purchase domain in efforts to acquire the property and that Resolutions
of properties 5b and c be filed without action; and (2) that the staff be
directed to continue efforts to acquire the properties in-
volved through mutual negotiations agreeable to both parties
at sums that both parties are willing to agree upön.
Request for two motions Councilman Cox said he would feel more comfortable if the
motion was stated as two separate motions.
Mayor Hyde agreed to split the motion and Councilman Egdahl
agreed as the second.
Motion to file restated It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Egdahl
that Items 5b and c be filed.
Speaking against motion Councilman Cox spoke against the motion, stating that the
efforts of redevelopment of the downtown area have been
predicated on the need for additional parking and the
property is definitely needed in the town center area.
-"--'-'" --~-
City Counc~l Meeting -5- July 11, 1978
Motion carried The motion carried by the following vot~, to-wit:
AYI:$: Mayor",H'yde, Councilmen Gillow, Egdahl
Noes: Councilman Cox
Absent: Councilman Scott
Motion to continue Itw<lS moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded 'by Counêilman, Cox
attempt to purchase and Uhanimqusly carried by thOsepÎ'esßntthat the staff,
property be, directed to attempt to acquiresaicl properties through
mutual agreøment with the parties concerned.
Sa. ORDINANCE - (Deleted £tom agenda)
AMENDING ORDINANCE #847
DESCRIBING TI-IE ACQúISITION
AND IMPROVEMENT TO BE MADE
ON ADDITIONAL PARKING LOTS
WITHIN CHULA VISTA PARKING
DISTRICT #1 - FIRST READ'ING'
b. RESOLUTION - (Filed ~'see motion above)
INTENT TO CONDEMN
PROPERTY OWNED BY
ANSEL AND MARJORIE
WATROUS FOR USE AS
A PARKING LOT IN
CHULA VISTA pARKING
DISTRICT #1
c. RESOLUTION - ,CEiled -s~ motion above)
INTENT TO CONDEMN
PROPERTY OWNED BY
MARJORIE RODRIQUEZ
FOR USE AS A PARKING
LOT IN CHULA VISTA
PARKING DISTRICT #1
d. RESOLUTION - (Deleted from agenda)
ESTABLISHING AND
CREATING CONSTRUCTION
AND ACQUISITION FUND
FOR USE OF PARKING
DISTRICT #1 AND TRANS-
FERRING $ 80,000 FROM
THE GENERAL FUND
e. RESOLUTION - (Deleted from agenda)
ESTABLISHING A RE-
PAYMENT SCHEDULE
FOR A LOAN TO THE
PARKING DISTRICT
6. PUBIC HEARING - This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
CONSIDERATION OF ,CHANGE opened the public hearing.
OF ZONE OF 1.03 ACRES
OF A 1.20 ACRE ilL" Director of Planning Peterson said that this is a ,proposal tp
SHAPED PARCEL LOCATED rezone 1.03 acres of a 1.20 acre "L" shaped parcel locáted
WEST OF THE EXISTING west of the existing Pep Boys store at 454 Broadway from
PEP BOYS STORE AT R-3 to C- T -P. The parcel has 25 feet of frontage on Broadway
454 BROADWAY FROM and is split zoned R-3 and C-T.
R-3 TO C-T-P
On June 14 the City Planning Commission certified the Nega-
tive DeclaratiOn and recommended approval of the change of
zone in accordance with their Resolution PCZ-78-K. '
--~-,- ..-
City Council Meeting -6- July 1.1, '1978
Mr. Peterson Stated the Pep Boys are planning to expand
their operations and enlarging their off-street parking
area. One ,of the conditions of approval is for the'applic
cant to improve the drainage ditch for theþortion that
fronts on the parking lots.
Philip K; Markha:m, AlA Mr. Markham said he represented the applicant, Pep Bö¥s.
7850 Mission Center Ct. He asked that the rezoning be approv~d and said hi£ client,
San. Diego 92lÔ8 had no problem with the conditions irriposed.
liarry Hoch Mr. Hoch said he owns the property adjacent to the south -
490 Fourth Av~nue a mobile home park - and was interested in how this,W'oulp.
Chula Vista be developed, i .,e., work "a,rea£, how mtlch noi.se 'there will
be, and if it will create a drainage problem for the mobile'
home park.
Development to be Mayor Hyde explained that ,under ,the "precise plan"'develòp-
under "precise plan" ment, any noise and drainage problews would be resolved
prior to approval of the development. He stlggested that
Mr. Hoch work with the staff, and make sure they are aware
of his concerns.
Public' hearing, closed There being no further comments, either for or against,
the public hearing was declareil closed.
6a. ORDINANCE NO. 1820 - It was moved by Councilman Cox that this ordinan~e be
APPROVING THE CHANGE OF placed, on its first 'reading and that the rèailingof the
ZONE FROM R-3 TO C-T-P text be waived by unanimous 'consent of thosepres'ent.
FOR 1.03 ACRES LOCATED
WEST OF 454"BROADWAY AND The motion carri~dby the following vote, to-wit:
CERTIFYING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION - FIRST READING AYES: Councilmen Cox, EgdahI, Hyile, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
RECESS A recess was called at 8:47 p.m. and the meeting reconv<;med
at 9:06 p.m.
7. PUBLIC HEARING - Mayor Hyde asked Council concurrence, in the interest 0.£
CONSIDERATION OF THE giving adequate consideration to this item and the hour
SPECIFIC PLAN/GENERAL (9: 06 p. m.), to limit the discussion to two hours; and if
DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR the discussion is not finished, to continue this item and
THE EL RANCHO DEL REY complete the balance of the agenda.
AREA
Motion to limit It was moved by Mayor Hyde and seconded by Councilman Cox
discussion that the Council agree to limit the time spent on this
particular item this evening to approximatl"ly two hours.
Motion clarified In answer to a query from Councilman Egdahl, Mayor Hyde
clarified that at the end of two hours, the Council would
agree as to a time and date to which the hearing would be
continued.
Motion carried The motion to limit discussion to two hours carried
unanimously by those present.
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Hyde
opened the public hearing.
_.."...._-,-,--_...._,,----,----
City Council Meeting -7- JUly 11, 1978
During the past seve~il months, the Planning 'Department,
in conjunction with oth~r City departments, has been
engaged in the preparation ,of comprehensive amendments
to the General Development, Plan ,and Schedule of the El
Rancho 'gel Rey Planned Community District. The Plan,
called the El Rancho del Rey,Specific Plan/General Devel-
opment Plan, is designed'to function as an intermediat,e
plan or policy bridge betweén the Chula Vista General
Plan and the City's zoningregulàtions.
On June 21, 1978 the Planning Commission ~ecommended that
the, Council rescind the, actions o.f 1970 and 1971 under which
the El Rancho del Rey General Development Plan and Schedule
were approved, but failed by a vote of 3-3 to approve the
El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan/General Development Plan,
or modifications thereto.
Detailed 'report In a comprehensive and detailed written report, Director,
submi tted of Planning Peterson presented the background of tne area,
histOrical notes and analysis, comments 01) the Rice Canyon
area, the Sedway/Cooke recommendation, ilensityissue, the
Goodkin Study,; actions of the ACCORD committee, and the
"Requested Changes Map" presented by the Otay Land Company.
(Copy of the complete report is on file in the City Clerk's
office. )
Differences in Mr. Peterson elaborated on his report by describing and
plans outlined outlining vari-colored areas on four maps displayed on
the wall - a map of the original plan, the proposed staff
plan, the "Requested Changes Map", and a composite of the
changes and proposedstaff"plan as a fourth map. The maps
indicated open space areas, low, medium and high density
areas, and street patterns. He explained the differences
in the density areas of the staff plan and the Otay Land
Company plan - the staff plan allows 5817 dwelling units
on 2350 acres of undeveloped land with 1/3 of the area
open space and the Otay Land Company plan had 8300 dwelling
units with the same open space.
Amendments proposed Mr. Peterson said that when the Council is in a position
to zoning ordinance and to adopt a plan for this area, staff will bring forward
P-C District regulations amendments to the specific plan regulations of the zoning
ordinance and to the P-C District regulations that will
make this Specific Plan the Plan of Record in a P-C zone.
Staff recommendation Mr. Peterson concluded with his recommendation that at the
appropriate time that the Council certify the EIR forwarded
previously, rescind the actions of 1970 and 1971 approving
the General Development Plan for El Rancho del Reyarea
and adopt the staff recommended plan as the official plan
for the El Rancho del Rey P-C Zone.
City Attorney comments City Attorney Lindberg commented on the procedures for
on procedures adopting a Specific Plan and said it is his opinion that
the proced!lres will, allow for the adoption of a Specific
Plan regardless of which plan is selecterlby the Council
and will not subject the City to any potential liability
in inverse condemnation. '
Sam Blick, Attorney Mr. Blick said he represented the Otay Land Company, a
Higgs, Fletch,er & Mack major land owner in the El Rancho del Rey area. He stated
San Diego that this is an unusual situation where the City has pre-
pared a development plan, rather than the developer, and
noted that it may take considerable time for presentations
by their economist, planner, and his legal arguments. He
suggested that other developers may wish to proceed first.
--'--
City Council Me~ting -8- July 11, 1978
Ray Watt Mr. Watt, representing the major landowner of t~e westerly
2160 Fletcher Parkway 450 acres of E1 Rancho d~l Rey, stated they have ~orked
El Caj on closely with the staff, ACCORD Committee and Sedwày/Cooke
consultants and at this time they support the staff plan
for that portion of the,p.operty. H~ said they are prepared
to present tentative maps for approval and are prepared to
participate in the development of "H" Street and off-site
improvements.
Gilbert Dreyfuss Mr. Dreyfuss said he was a partner of the Telegraph Canyon
333 South Hope Street Group, and they have a 16 acre parcel - the last of 180
Los Angeles 90071 ac,es that they have developed. He said they have been
excluded from the study and want to be assured that nothing
in the proposed plan will preclude them from tYing into
"H" Street as they are prepared to pay their costs, if
their plan is accepted by the City.
Mr. Peterson said the 16 acres are zoned R-l-H at, this
time and if the Group can negotiate access to a public
street, they can develop in accordance with approved plans.
Sam Blick Mr. Blick stated that there is a very little difference
Representing Otay between what the staff is recommending and what his client
Land, Company recommends, being subtle differences in density; however,.
the problem is cost. He noted that,the estimated Cost
is approximately $258,000,000 which must be paid for in
density. He commented on the open space required, rela-
tiönship between cost and density to provide medium priced,
homes, and disagreement with staff that the housing element
dOes not apply in this area.
Elliot L. Lewis Mr. Lewis said his firm was hired to do a marketing analysis
Executive Vice President for the Gersten Companies "which led to the development of
Sanford R. Goodkin a plan in terms of the kind of product and pricing of the
Research Corporation product and the number that would be in keeping with market
1125 Camino del Mar demands."
Del Mar CA 92014
He said the analysis primarily deals" with the costs- for
infra-structures, open space, oy~rhead, marketing, sales,
coSt of money, ,and a fair profit. His comments, included
relationship of risk to profit, the right òf free enterprise,
lengthy payback period, and that the reward objective for
the El Rancho del Rey area is computed for 10% before taxes
and must be covered by density determined at 3.8 dwelling
units per acre.
Mr. Lewis quot'ed figures of $105,000,000 for "front ,end"
cost for development of land and $153,000,000 for financing,
marketing, overhead and 10% profit, oratot'àl of$2S8,000,OOO
not including financing of, actual unit ~construction cost.
He said this has been considered on the need to meet the
market demand. Hestat~il that after their analysis of
population &røwth, it was determined that multi-family
units will be the only way to provide needed housing at a
price that can be afforded, and that the cost of housing
under the staff plan would not be feasible.
James ,Fairl\lán Mr. Fairman r,eferred to a,summary sybmi tted to the Council
Project Design 'Consultant with comments, criticisms ,and proposals regarding the s,taff
Otay Land Company General Development/Specific Plan for El Rancho del Rey.
(A copy is on file in the City Clerk's office.) He, com-
mented on the projected density and open space; failure
to meet objective of mixed housing types; maximum area for
low density and only 2% for apartment units which precludes
low income housing; and lack of economic and engineering
studies in the staff plan.
..,-._---,. .-
City Council Meeting -9- July 11, 1978
Mr. Fairman said that the E1 Rancho del Rey proposed plan
would have approximately 8270 units with an overall density
of 3.5 units per acre vs 2.5 units on the staff plan, or a
difference of only 1 unit per acre, with the same open space.
He described the plan to cluster higher density along "H"
Street and other streets, and noted that the development
plans are nearly identica1. He concluded that their al-
ternative plan is a superior plan to the staff plan.
Hearing hot closed Mayor Hyde indicated that the hearing will not be closed
and when the hearing is reconvened, additional summary
remarks will be permitted as appropriate.
Motion to convene It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Councilman
meeting of July 18 at Egdahl and unanimously carried by those present that the
4:00 p.m. and continue Council convene the regular meeting on Tuesday, July 18,
hearing at a 7:00 p.m. 1978 at 4:00 p.m. with routine items handled from 4:00 p.m.
session of that meeting to 6:00 p.m. and continue the hearing on El Rancho del Rey
to follow scheduled hearings at the 7:00 p.m. session.
RECESS A recess was called at 11:25 p.m. and the meeting reconvened
at 11:30 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR It was moved by Mayor Hyde, seconded by Councilman Cox
(Items 8 through 13) and unanimously carried by those present that the Consent
Calendar be approved and adopted.
8. RESOLUTION NO. 9176 - On June 23, 1978 Ms. Poletta Sue Hudson granted the City
ACCEPTING GRANT DEED a deed for one foot control Lots "A" and "B" within
FROM POLETTA SUE Tentative Parcel Map 78-12, which are required to control
HUDSON FOR ONE FOOT access and adjacent development easterly and northerly
CONTROL LOTS "A" AND of the future Las Flores Drive.
"B", TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 78-12
9. RESOLUTION NO. 9177 - On June 23, 1978 Ms. Paletta Sue Hudson granted easements
ACCEPTING GRANT OF to the City for street trees along Second Avenue and future
EASEMENT FROM POLETTA Las FJoresDrive in' accordance with the conditions for
SUE HUDSON FOR STREET the approval of Tentative Parcel Map No. 78-12.
TREE PURPOSES
10. RESOLUTION NO. 9178 - One of the conditions for the approval of Tentative Parcel
ACCEPTING GRANT OF Map 78-12 was for the owner to grant a 26-foot wide strip
EASEMENT FOR STREET of land as right of way for the future Las Flores Drive
PURPOSES FROM POLETTA within the easterly boundary of the map. The nece,ssary
SUE HUDSON easement was granted to the City on June 23, 1978.
11. RESOLUTION NO. 9179 - On June 23, 1978 Ms. Hudson granted the required 10-foot
ACCEPTING GRANT OF wide easement to the City for drainage purposes, in
EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE accordaI).ce with the conditions of approval of Tentative
PURPOSES FROM POLETTA Parcel Map No. 78-12.
SUE HUDSON
12. RESOLUT'ION NO. 9180 - One of the conditions for the approval of Tentative Parcel
ACCEPTING GRANT OF Map No. 78-12 was for the owner to grant a 4-foot wide
EASEMENT FOR STREET strip of land to provide the necessary right of way for
PURPOSES FROM POLETTA the easterly half of Second Avenue. On June 23, 1978
SUE HUDSON, DEDICATING Ms. Poletta Sue Hudson granted the required 'easement to
AND NAMING IT AS SECOND the City.'
AVENUE
-" ----.
City Council Meeting -10- July 11, 1978
13. RESOLUTION NO. 9181 - During the excavation to subgrade for the improvement of
APPROVING CHANGE ORDER ',IF" Street, it ,was discovered tha,t the existing soil
NO.3 - "F" ,STREET conditions are excessively moist'and expansive. The
WIDENING, FOURTH Engineering staff recommended thataggrega,te base mat~rial
AVENUE TO CHURCH AVENUE be placed beneath the c1,1rb and gutt,er to eliminate thß
possibility of extensive ,cracking and displacement ,of
the new curb. The additional material will add the
amount, of $2,275 to the contract cost.
(END OF CO~SENT CALENDAR)
RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING
14. RESOLUTION NO. 9182 - Bids were received on June 1, 1978 for furnishing the
ACCEPTING BIDS, AND City asphaltic emulsion for the period of July 1 through
AWARDING CONTRACT September 30, 1978. It was recommended that the contract
FOR ASPHALTIC EMULSION be awarded to Sim J. Harris Company, who submitted ,the low
bid of $81 per ton on an estimated usage of 460 tons of
RS-2 asphaltic emulsion.
Re'sol ution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was waived
by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
15. RESOLUTION NO. 9183 - Bids were received on J1,1nel, 1978 for aggregate base and'
ACCEPTING BIDS AND sand for the period July .1 ,,1978through June 30, 1979.
AWARDING CONTRACT It Was recommended that the bids be accepted and the
FOR AGGREGATE BASE contract awarded to t,jelson ,& Sloan. low bidder, for an
AND SAND estimated 3,500 tons of aggregate base and 1,000 tons
oOf sand,
Resolution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text Was waived
by unanimous consent of those present, passed and adopted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl
Noes: None '
Absent: Councilman Scott
16. RESOLUTION NO. 9184 - On June 1, 1978 bi,ds,were received for an estimated 3,800
ACCEPTING BIDS AND tons of Screenings' (stone chips) for, thepedod of July 1,
AWARDING CONTRACT 1978 through December 31, 1978. It Was recommended that
FOR SCREENINGS the bids be accepted and the contract awarded to Nelson
(STONE CHIPS) & Sloan,'low bidder.
Resolution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of 'the text was waived
by unanimous consentofthüse present, passeil'and adopted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox,Egdahl
Noes: None
Absent: CoUncilman Scbtt
. -
-- -. --,----,
City Council Meeting -11- July 11, 1978
17. RESOLUTION NO. 9185 - Bids were received On June 1, 1978 tor an estímated 4,500
ACCEPTING BIDS AND tons of asphaltic concrete for the period of July 1, 1978
AWARDING CONTRACT through December 31, 1978. It was recommended that the
FOR ASPHALTIC CONCRETE bids be accepted and the contract awarded to Sim J. Harris
Company, low bidder.
In response to a query from Councilman Egdahl,Director of
Purchasing Espinosa said that the price increase is ap-
proximately 4% over the last bids, in each of the categoriès.
Resolution offered Offered by Mayor Hyde, the reading of the text was" wai ved
by unanimous consent of these present, passed and adopted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, Councilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
18. RESOLUTION NO. 9186 - In 1976 Resolution No. 8258 approved the cooperative bid
EXTENDING CONTRACT with the City of San Diego for library book requirements,
FOR THE CITY'S ANNUAL with the contract awarded to Baker arid Taylor Company.
REQUIREMENTS OF Under the option to renew for one year periods, it was
LIBRARY BOOKS recommended that'the contract be extended to cover the
period of July 1, 1978 through June 30, 1979.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent of those present, passed and
adopted by the fOllowing vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, 'Egdahl? Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
19. RESOLUTION NO. 9187 - One of the conditions of approval for Tentative, Parcel Map
APPROVING AGREEMENT #4- 77 was for the subdivider to construct public impròve-
:BETWEEN THE CITY AND ments, for the alley between Second Avenue and,Minöt Avenue
WILLARD A. RIGLEY FOR prior to the approval of the final Map. The Planning Com~
DEFERRAL OF ~UBLIC missionapP!oved the requestoOf the owne! and subdivider,
IMPROVEMENTS AND LIEN Willard RigleY, to ,defer the public improvements subject
FOR TENTATIVE PARCEL to executing 'a lien agrÓ>ßmeht of $4,400 to guarantee the
MAP #4-77 cost of installation.
Resolution offered Offered by Councilman Cox, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent of those present,' passeil and
adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
UNANIMOUS CONSENT ITEM
19-A. RESOLUTION NO, 9189 - The Anti-RecesSiøn Fiscal 'Assistance ,Program was"extended
APPROPRIATING FEaERAL through September 30; 1978. Director of, 'F'inan¿e, Grant
ANTI-RECESSION FUNDS recommended that the January and April quarterly payme~ts
of$1~5,940.00 and the City's investment "income of
$18,539.29- a tota1of $214,479.29 - be appropriated
for Employer's Contributions' to the Public Employees ,
Retirement System. The funds must be appropriated,prior
to July 14, 1978.
In answer to a question fromMayor Hyde, Director of Finance
Grant said that these funds must be appropriated or expended
within six months of receipt.
..,"
"',
City Council M~eting -12- July 11, 1978
Resolution offered Offered by Co¡mci lman Egdalll, the, reading üftheteJ\t
was waived, by unanimous consent of those present, passed'
and adopted by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Egdahl, Hyde;'Gillow, Cox
Noes: None
Absent: 'Councilman Scott
CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES
20. RESOLUTION NO. 9188 - Comprehensive Employment Training Act funq~ received by
ACCEPTING BIDS AND the City for overhead costs for administering the CETA
AWARDING CONTRACT program may be utilized as approved by the Council. The
FOR GROUNDS MAIN- Park Maintenance Division has a need for groundsmaihtenance
TENANCE EQUIPMENT equipment to be used by CETA personnel in traveling crews.
(Continued from
June 13, 1978) Bids were received on May 22, 1978 for Item 1; one three
unit turf mower; and Item 2: one utility trailer.
It was recommended that the bids be accepted and the contract
awarded to B. Hayman Company Inc.,. low bidder for Item 1
in the amount of $3,2~5; and to American Trailer Manufa.c-
turingCompany, low bidder for:ltem 2 in the amount of
$1,lS7.
Resolution offered Offered by MayorHyde, the reading of the text was waived,
by unanimous consent o£those present, passed and adøpted
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Mayor Hyde, CoUncilmen Gillow, Cox, Egdahl
NOes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
21. ORDINANCE NO. 1819 " On July 5, 1978 the Council placed on first reading the
AMENDING ZONING MAP approval of the rezoning of 10 àcres of property located
TO CHANGE THE ZONE on the north side of Otay Valley Road, west of I-80S from
OF 10 ACRES LOCATED R-l to R-3-P-12.
ON BOTH SIDES OF
MELROSE AVENUE,
NORTH OF OTAY VALLEY
ROAD, FROM R-l TO
R-3-P-12 - SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION
Ordinance placed It was moved by Councilman Cox that this ordinance be
on second reading placed on its second reading and adopted and that the
and adopted reading of the text be waived by unanimous Mnsent of
those present.
The motion carried by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Councilmen Cox, Egdahl, Hyde, Gillow
Noes: None
Absent: Councilman Scott
22. REPORT - STAFF (S~e pag~ # 1 of the minut~s)
RECOMMENDATION ON
MTDB EARLY GUIDEWAY
IMPLEMENTATION -
(Continued from
July S, 1978)
--,
City Council Meeting -13- JUly U, 19,78
23. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER
a. REPORT ON PROPOSED City Manager Cole said that a communic,ationw,asreceived
sourU BAY COMMUNITY from SUPEIrvis,or Uamilton, reqùesting atl¡Jxpression of. in-
CENTER terest from the Cities' of lmperial Beàch, National City,
Chula Vista and San Diego in a proposal to ,construct a
South Bay Community Center that would serve the South Bay
area utili:l.ingsome of the City's block grant funds.
Estimated cost, location and pro-rata share for each
participating agency would be developed by, Çourity staff
after sufficient interest is expressed.
Support not recommended }II'. Cole said that staff was 'I'ecommending that the project
not be supported at this time due to the uncertainty of
on- going revenues and the need for funds in other areas.
Al Manese Mr. Manese said a great effort has been made to create an
1366 Monterey Court interest in suppdrting and building a facility of this
Chula Vista nature in the South, Bay which can be used by many different
South Bay organizations. He stated that the South Bay
Filipino-American Community Association will volunteer
to manage the facility,with "little or no ongoing cost"
to any governmental agency. He urged that the Council
support the project as National City and San Diego have
indicated an interest.
Greg Alabado Mr. Alabado said there is a definite need for a community
1374 Los Coches Court center for less affluent families in the South Bay. He
Chula Vista requested that the CouI).cil not reject the plan, but to
President,South Bay show an interest in order that a study can be made by the
Filipino-American Assn. County.
Gregory J. Smith Mr. Smith stated that Supervisor Hamilton has proposed this
1600 Pacific Highway project as he felt there is a need for this type of facility,
San Diego and if theÎ'e is a positive response from the Council, the
County staff will identify sites, costs, etc. and come
back prior to the Fifth Year application for Block Grant
money for the touncil to address the matter at that time.
He said the request is to leave the door open at this time
for study.
Council discussion Council discussion ensued concerning the various groups who
might use this facility, type of programs to be offered
(recreation, social, etc.), questions raised on howtheuseof"
the building will be scheduled, administration of the facility,
difficulty with revenues and government expenditures under
Proposi tion 13, and the need to give careful consideration
to this request.
Motion to indicate It was moved by Councilman Cox and seconded by Councilman
an interest in project, Gillow that the Council indicate an interest in gathering
pending additional additional information on what is being planned, and what
information the cost~'would be, and what the commitment of the City
of Chula Vista would be.
Suggestion to explore Councilman Egdahl expressed his concern that there are
use of school district school facilities that are not, being used, especially
facilities during the summer; and that other possibilities could be
explored to open up school districts to allow community
groups to use these facilities rather than construct new
ones. He suggested that the motion include that the Council
ask in the continued study, that the school districts be
approached in this regard.
---'-'----------
City Council Meeting -14- July 11, 1978
Motion <cårried, with Councilman Cox agreed to,includethesugge.stiôri in his
,addition às suggested motion; CouncilnianGillow ,concurred and the. motion carried
by Councilman Egdahl unanimously by those present. ' '
REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS
24. REPORT ON NEW FEE Duringb;"dget hearings, the Council 'approved the concept
STRUCTURE FOR of continuing only those recreation classes andac.tivities
RECREATIONAL which are self-supporting from u~er fees. The Director of,
ACTIVITIES AND Parks and Recreation submi Ùed a proposed schedule oi'feeS
CLASSES with a minimum registration often persons required ,to '
start or continue a class or activity.
The new fees will not be applied to those activities or
classes presently in progress, or for classes where regis-
tration has already been completed.
Motion to accept report It was moved by Councilman Cox, seconded by Mayor Hyde
and unanimously carried by those present that the report
be accepted.
MAYOR'S REPORT
Office supply Mayor Hyde said that in the interest of economy, one copy
conservation of agendas and minutes of City Committees and Boards and
Commissions will be routed to Councilmembers, with additional
copies" available as needed.
League dinner meeting Mayor Hyde noted that the League of California Cities meeting
is scheduled for Thursday, July 20 hosted by San Marcos.
Reservations should be made 'with the City Clerk.
Councilman Gillow , Mayor Hyde said that Councilman Scott' has requested to be
appointed to Mayor's replaced on the Mayor's Advisory Committee on Visitor
Advisory Committee Industry,Councilman Gillowagreed to serve as Chairman
on Visitor Industry of this committee, and was appointed by the Mayor.
Joint meeting of the Mayor Hyde announced that there will be a joint City CoUncil/
Council and School School Boards meeting at 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 20 at
District Board ,the Sweetwater Union High School District office.
Invitation to social Mayor Hyde said a letter has been received from Mr. Rich
evening with Chamber McGinty on behalf of the Chamber, of Commerce inviting the
of Commerce Council ar¡d Department Heads to attend a sö'cial evening
on July 12, 1978 at Davies Realty, 786 Third Ave.nue starting
at 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL COMMENTS
Pending items Councilman Egdahl referred to the list of pending items,
noted noting that a Council Conference was to be scheduled after
,budget seS.sioI).s to review all contracts, etc., of the
concessionaires of the City. He asked if that coi:.tld be
scheduled for August.
Councilman Egdahl referred to the action taken to approve
brief minutes of Council meetingS for a trial period.
Motion to continue It was moved by Councilman Egdah1, seconded by Councilman'
brief minutes of Cox and unanimously carried by those present that the
Council meetings Clerk continue to prepare brief minutes.
ADJOURNMENT Mayor Hyde adjourned the meeting at 12:08 a.m. to the Joint
City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting scheduled for
7:00 p.m. on Thursday, July 13, 1978 in the Council Chambers,
Ci ty Ha 1.
~"
~, Ci, V~d~
City Clerk
------
FILED
\D!-'
7\('"
!~ j)~
AFFIDAVIT OF POSTr~G ORDER
¡;T.r.TE OF CALIFORNIA ) OF }:.j),1uURNm:~:T OF MF:ETING
COlì?lTY OF' :>;\tl DIEGO ) 58.
Cl'rï CF ('HULA VIST.I\ )
I, Jane A. Diedrichs, belng duly !'worn depose and s.\y:
That! am th~ ¿Illy choßon, qualified and actIng Deputy City Clerk of the
Cour\cil of tilG City of Chula Vista;
~tut the ~ular meeting of the Council of the City'
of Chula Vista was held ~ II, 192R . ---
and said me\".ting was adjourned to the time and plact;'; as specified in
the order of adjournment ATTACHED H!::RETO:
Thnt on July 12. 1978 Rt the hour of - 8;00 aU1.._-
I posted a copy of $aid order at a conspicuous place on or near
the door of the place at which said ~~eting of July 11. 1978
was held.
~,D~,
Deputy ëIty Clerk
Subscribed and &worn to before me this
MW~ day of
. 197L.
REGULAR
MINUTES OF A §R~~ MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Held Tuesday July 11 , 1978
The City Council met in the Council Conference Room at the City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue,
on the above date at 7:00 p.m. with the following Councilmen present:
COUNCILMEN Hyde. Cox, Egdahl. Gi 11ow
Absent: Scott
Vacancy:
* * * *
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting at ] 2 : 0 R i~IJ\:' until Jllly 1 ", lq7A
at 7:00 p.m. in the £JI~x~:ßJI~Jt1Jt1tX~x)[x4e'ZÞxk~ßx~~)[ Chula Vista,
Council Chambers, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue,
California. (Joint meeting with the Redevelopment Agency)
I, JANE A. DIEDRICHS, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY
that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order adopted by the City Council at
Regular ,19~.
the :ß1I1{óå:>ai Meeting of July 11
c;.D~
Jane A. Diedrichs, Deputy City Clerk
City of Chula Vista, California