HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1984-11574
Revised 3/29/84
RESOLUTION NO. 11574
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA ESTABLISHING THE HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE SEWER
REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT - RICE CANYON TRUNK
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the developers of Hidden Vista Village (Terra
Nova) have requested that the City establish a reimbursement
district to repay them for a portion of offsite facilities and all
of the oversized sewer mains they constructed in the development
of their subdivision, and
WHEREAS, a report has been prepared setting forth the
reimbursement cost data and the breakdown of those properties that
will be assessed, which is attached hereto and marked Exhibit "A",
and
WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code requires a
public hearing to consider the establishment of a sewer reimburse-
ment district and the City Council, by Resolution No. 11562,
adopted on March 13, 1984, set April 3, 1984 as the date to hold a
public hearing to consider comments relative to the establishment
of the Hidden Vista Village Reimbursement District - Rice Canyon
Trunk, and
WHEREAS, having heard all testimony relative to said
sewer reimbursement district, the City Council has determined it
is in the best interests to establish the district.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby establish the Hidden Vista
Village Sewer Reimbursement District - Rice Canyon Trunk - in
accordancce with the attached report and the methodology contained
therein.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
j-f--
\: . .. -',"'" '1/,- '.L---,......_~, -~., ',J i
Thomas' ~.'H~rro~:' city
Attorney
ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 3rd
19 84 . by the following vote, to-wit:
McCand1iss, Scott. Moore
day of
April
AYES:
Councilmen :
NAYES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
Councilmen :
None
CotI'Icilmen :
Councilmen :
None
Malcolm, Cox
~~.~
ATTEST
MAYOR PRO TEMPORE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) s s.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CTY CLERK of the City of Chulo Vista, California,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of
RESOLUTION NO. 11574
,and that the same has not been amended or repealed.
DATED
( seal)
City Clerk
CC-660 - MpT
REPORT
HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE
SEWER REIMBURSEMENT
RICE CANYON TRUNK
I. PURPOSE
The purpose of this report is to present a methodology by which
Financial Scenes, developers of Hidden Vista Village (Terra Nova), and
the City can be reimbursed for offsite and oversizing of the Rice Canyon
Trunk Sewer.
II. Background
City Council by Resolution Number 10081-A approved the Tentative Map for
Hidden Vista Village, Chula Vista Tract 80-15. As a condition of
approval, the developer (Financial Scene Inc.) was required to construct
offsite sewer facilities between the western subdivision boundary and
the Spring Valley Outfall. They were also required to upsize onsite
facilities to accommodate future construction to the east.
The Ci ty, through an agreement with the State of Cal ifornia constructed
a segment of the Rice Canyon Sewer in conjunction with the 1-805 freeway.
On August 11, 1981, Council directed the City Manager to begin
proceedings for the formation of the reimbursement district requested by
the developer. Said direction was contingent upon receipt of a deposit
to cover City costs. That deposit was received on November 23, 1982. A
preliminary district was set up early in 1983; however, the processing
of the district was postponed with submittal of the Specific Plan
proposal by the Gersten Companies. In January 1984 McMillan, managers
of the Hidden Vista Village project (now Terra Nova) requested that the
reimbursement be processed based upon the presently approved E. R. D. R.
Specifi c Pl an. McMi 11 an does not want the reimbursement to be revi sed
shoul d the densi ti es be increased by the recently submi tted Gersten
proposal. This preliminary reimbursement district is now before Council
to receive public testimony. The parties affected by the reimbursement
di stri ct have been noti fi ed of thi s heari ng in accordance wi th Code
requirements.
III. GENERAL DISCUSSION
A. Determination of Costs.
The costs listed in Exhibit A are broken down into categories of
offsite and onsite. Unit costs were obtained from actual contract
prices included in a bid by Signs and Pinnick Inc. dated March 30,
1981. Lump-sum costs have been verified by the Engineering
Department. Quantities were obtained from approved pl ans for the
Hi dden Vi sta Vill age subdi vi si on and verifi ed by the Engi neeri ng
Department.
/?~ 1/.1"7 r
City costs were obtained from charges paid by the City to the State
for work relative to the portion of Rice Canyon Trunk sewer
constructed with I-80S.
B. Determination of Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU)
Weighting factors have been used to relate the reimbursement
required to be paid to actual usage of the facilities. The City's
Environmental Review procedures were used relative to sewage
generation. A single family with 3.38 persons per dwelling unit
was used as a basis for an equivalent dwell ing unit. All other
types of dwell i ngs are shown to have 1 ess peopl e per dwell i ng
unit. Per capita sewage generation is considered the same for all
types of dwelling units. Single family attached homes (condos) are
considered to house 2.66 people per dwelling and multiple family
(apartments) are considered to house 1.94 people per dwelling. The
weighting factor for single family attached and multiple family
dwelling was calculated from the ratio of people per dwelling
divided by the number of people per dwelling for single family
detached units. Each was rounded up to the nearest tenth.
Consequently. the factors used to cmpute EDU' s for si ngl e family
attached (6-10 du/acre) and multiple family (11-18 du/acre) are
1 ess than one. The number of EDU' s to be charged agai nst the
commercial areas were estimated based upon the City's Environmental
review procedures and factors shown in Exhibit B. See Exhibit B.
C. Determination of Reimbursable Amounts Offsite and Onsite of Hidden
Vista Village:
1. Offsite Costs
All costs associated with the offsite sewer construction have
been included in the reimbursable amount. The amount to be
reimbursed by properties other than the constructing developer
will be the difference between the total cost and the
developer's share of the construction cost.
Reimbursement to the City is the amount represented by the
actual cost of sewer faci 1 i ti es constructed 1 ess moni es pai d
into the Rice Canyon Sewer Di strict fund by previ ous
developments less the fair share of the units west of I-80S
which did not contribute to the Trunk Sewer. See Exhibit C.
2. Onsite Costs
The Hidden Vista Village development of itself would require
constructi on of 1593 feet of 8-i nch sewer 1 i ne and 1575 feet
of 10-inch sewer line along the trunk sewer alignment.
Upsizing is provided to accommodate service to upstream
developments. Only the upsizing from the required sewer line
-2-
/?-//J7f
size was included in the reimbursable costs. All other onsite
costs were considered to be required to serve the development
and are not included. See Exhibit C.
D. Determination of Parcels to be Included in the Reimbursement Plan:
All parcels within the delineated basin shown on Exhibit "E" were
included in the calculations except those presently existing
developments whi ch had been requi red to pay into the Rice Canyon
Trunk Sewer Fund, school and park sites, and parcels either using
septic systems or likely to use septic systems.
School and park sites were not included because users would
otherwise be assessed at their place of residence, and thereby
eliminate the possibility of double assessment. The existing
developments were not included in the dwelling unit total because
they had previously paid into the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer Fund.
The dwelling units west of I-80S were included because no
contribution was made by those developments to the Rice Canyon
Trunk Sewer Fund. The fee for those units has been subtracted from
the Ci ty' s reimbursabl e costs for facil ities constructed, thereby
reducing the reimbursable amount due.
Pa rc el sin the Lynwood Hill s area whether occupi ed by dwell i ng
units or vacant have not been considered in the dwelling unit
totals. Parcels with existing units are on septic tanks and may
never connect. Vacant parcel s are small in number and may be
allowed to use septic systems as well. Should any of the parcel s
in the Lynwood Hills area or any area capable of connecting to the
system (and not specifically considered such as an area outside of
the gravity basin) connect in the future, those parcels will be
charged the appropriate fee plus interest and the funds deposited
in the City's general fund.
The number of equivalent dwelling units was calculated by using the
highest density of the density range shown on the El Rancho Del Rey
Specific Plan times the acreages for that density range. The
current specific plan submittal by the Gersten Companies indicates
higher density than the present specific plan. McMillan has
indicated that they wish to have this reimbursement agreement
approved based upon the presently approved spec i fic pl an wi th no
revision in the amount to be paid for each SPA if density is
increased.
E. Methodology:
The same basic methodology used in the Casa Del Rey Reimbursement
Di stri ct was used in thi s di stri ct for the type of improvements
considered. Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
-3-
/?~//S7J./
di scusses offsi te and excess capacity rel ative to reimbursement.
During the processing of the Casa Del Rey District it was
determined that offsite improvement costs should be spread between
all benefited properties including the development which
constructed the facilities. Onsite improvements were considered on
the basis of excess improvements or improvements constructed beyond
what was needed by the development to serve itself. Equi val ent
dwelling units were determined by the method stated in IIIB of this
report. See Exhibit D.
F. Applicability of Assessment:
The assessments calculated for this district shall be charged any
properties within or adjacent to the service area as delineated on
Exh i bit E whi ch are served by the subject trunk sewer, whether
through gravity flow, by pumping or by virtue of land grading.
G. Interest to be Added:
To the base cost per equivalent dwelling unit there will be added
simple interest at 7 percent per annum to be charged at the time of
issuance of bui 1 di ng permi ts or connecti on to the subject trunk
sewer. The interest shall be calculated on a quarterly basis and
shall i ncl ude the total number of full quarters from the date of
commencement up to but not incl uding the quarter in which payment
of such charges are paid commencing on April 3, 1984. Six percent
will be payabl e to the entiti es enti tl ed to reimbursement and one
percent to the City to cover costs of contract administration.
H. Term of Reimbursement:
Maximum term of the
Thereafter the amounts
general fund of the Ci ty
Municipal Code.
Reimbursement Agreement is 20 years.
collected shall be deposited into the
in accordance with Chapter 15.50 of the
I. Order of Reimbursement:
The facilities constructed first which are subject to reimbursement
will be repaid in the chronological order of construction.
Therefore, facilities constructed and paid for by the City having
been first constructed will be reimbursed first. Consequently the
funds in the existing sewer account have been credited to the City
in determining the remaining amount to be reimbursed to the City.
J. Time of Reimbursement:
Reimbursement charges shall be calcul ated and coll ected pri or to
issuance of a building permit in accordance with weighting factors.
-4-
/{~//s7.y
K. Maximum Charges for El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan Properties:
Maximum number of equi val ent dwell i ng uni ts to be assessed for
upstream properties (ERDR Specific Plan Area not including Rice
Canyon SPA) shall be those units contributing to the onsite segment
of the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer as indicated in Exhibit D excluding
Dreyfuss property and the commercial property at Otay Lakes Road
(i.e. 3143 EDU's), Dreyfuss property to be charged actual number of
EDU's connecting.
L. Sample Reimbursement Charges:
A. Properties connecting downstream of Hidden Vista on April 4,
1985. (North and west of western boundary as shown on Map
10051)
(A)
~ ~
r iNO.Of)l$ )
(Factor) \Units \rnIT +
(B)
r --
I No. of \ "'
\Quarters'x (0.0175)
(A) x (B)
Si ngl e Family (1.0) (1) ($41.93) + ($41.93) (0.07) = $44.87
Si ngl e Family
Attached (0.8) (1) ($41.93) + ($33.54) (0.07) = $35.89
Duplex (0.7) (1) ($41.93) + ( $29.35) (0.07) = $31. 41
Multipl e Family (0.6) (1) ($41.93) + ( $25.16) (0.07) = $26.92
B. Properti es connecti ng adjacent to or upstream of Hi dden Vi sta
Village on April 4, 1985
(Offsite + Onsite)
Single Family (1.0) (1) ($41.93 + $11.34) + ($53.24) (0.07) = $57.00
Si ngl e Fami ly
Attached (0.8) (l) ($41.93 + $11.34) + ($42.62)(0.07) = $45.60
Du P 1 ex (0.7) (1) ($41.93 + $11.34) + ($35.29) (0.07) = $39.90
Multipl e Family (0.6) (l) ($41.93 + $11.34) + ( $31.96)(0.07) = $34.20
IV. CONCLUSION
The proposed reimbursement district encompasses the entire gravity basin
shown on Exhibit E. Parcels included in calculation of the reimbursable
amount are those which coul d reasonably be expected to connect to the
subject sewer within the term of the reimbursement agreement. A parcel
connecting to the subject trunk sewer will be charged the calculated
reimbursement charge plus interest whether or not that parcel is
included in the determination of the reimbursement charge.
Reimbursement charges for each development shall be determi ned on the
basis of equivalent dwelling units within that development.
Costs were ei ther deri ved from actual bi d pri ces or confi rmed by the
Engineering Department.
-5-
!?-//S7Y
Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code was followed in
detennining the amount of interest to be paid; the length of time the
reimbursement agreement will be in effect; the improvements to be
included and the process to be followed.
Order of reimbursement was based upon the chronological sequence of
construction of the facilities.
WAU:vt
WPC 0325E
-6-
/(-//5?y
EXHIBIT A
I. REIMBURSABLE COST
A. Offsite Sewer Costs Paid by Financial Scene
Description Unit Unit Cost Total
18" PVC 2421 LF 33.00 79,893.00
15" PVC 2043 LF 20.00 40,860.00
Manholes 16 Ea 970.00 15,520.00
Encasement 18" PVC 334 LF 16.17 5,401.00
Encasement 4-8" PVC 20 LF 16.17 323.00
Connect to Exist Stub 1 Ea 128.00 128.00
Connect to Exist MH 2 Ea 71 5.00 1,430.00
Repave Street Surface 360 LF 3.50 1,260.00
18" PVC Steel Pipe Encase 20 LF 20.00 400.00
14!>,21!>.UU
E ng i neeri ng 15,000.00
Gradi ng 5,000.00
$165,215.00
City Costs 3,000.00
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICT $168,215.00
B. Offsite Sewer Costs Paid by City of Chula Vista
Descri pti on
15" PVC
Manholes
Mi sc Iron
Pl ug Pipe
Encasement 15"
Unit
Uni t Cost
858 LF
2 Ea
720 Lbs
2 Ea
197.4 Cy
20.00
2,500.00
0.40
100.00
75.00
TOT AL
Less Funds in Rice Canyon Sewer Fund
TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICT
C. Cost of Upsizing Within Hidden Vista Village
1. Difference in Cost (Constructed - Required)
a. 15 Inch PVC (8" required)
Total
17,160.00
5,000.00
288.00
200.00
14,805.00
37,453.00
19,628.00
$17,825.00
1 5" P VC
8" PVC
$20.00 LF
$12.00 LF
Total Within Subdivision
1593 LF
Cost of Upsizing $ 8.00 LF
~-1/579'
EXHIBIT A (continued)
b. 15 inch PVC (10" required)
15" PVC
10" PVC
Cost of
c. 12" PVC
12" PVC
8" PVC
$20.00
14.50
$ 5.!>O
Total Within Subdivision
1575 LF
$1 7. 50 LF
$12.00 LF
Total Within Subdivision
2886 LF
Cost of Upsizing $ 5.50 LF
D. Total On-site Reimbursable Cost Hidden Vista Village (Terra Nova)
1. 15" PVC
(1593 LF) ($8.00) =
2. 15" PVC
. (1575 LF) ( $5.50) =
3. 12"
(2886 LF) ($5.50) =
TOTAL =
$12,744.00
$ 8,662.50
$15,873.00
$37,279.50
EXHIBIT B
A. Determination of Weighting Factors
Single Family
Single Family Attached
Dup 1 ex
Multiple Family
Example:
Single Family Attached
3.38 People/DU .
2.66 People/DU
2.5
1.94
1.0
0.8
0.7
0.6
2.66 = 0.8
"3":"3H
rf'~ 1/57'1
B. Factors to Determine EDU for Other Than Residential
l. Office Bldgs & Stores (Multiple)
a. No. of Stores
1) 1.00 EDU 1st store
2) 0.60 EDU each store thereafter
b. By square foot area
1) 1.00 EDU 1st 1,000 sq. ft. and;
2) 0.60 EDU per 1,000 sq. ft. or a fraction thereof
2. Commercial Bldg. (Shopping Center)
a. By square foot area
1) 1.00 EDU 1 st 1,000 sq. ft.
2) 0.60 EDU each 1,000 sq. ft. or a fraction thereof
b. By gals. per square foot of floor area per month/280
3. Church, Theatre or Auditorium
1.33 EDU/150 seats or a fraction thereof
4. Bank
a. By square foot area
1) 1.00 EDU 1st 1,000 sq. ft. and;
2) 0.60 EDU per 1,000 sq. ft. or a fraction thereof
5. Vons, Alpha Beta & Safeway - 15.00 EDU
6. Service Station - 2.0 EDU
C. If a use is not 1 i sted, the wei ghti ng factors shall be determi ned
by the City Engineer based upon estimated sewage production divided
by 280 gallons per EDU or other i nformati on approved by the Ci ty
Engineer.
WPC 0909E
;f'- //S7~
EXHIBIT C
A. Cost Per EDU for Offsite Improvements (all connecting units pay this fee)
Hidden Vista Village
Ci ty of Chu1 a Vi sta
$168,215 + 2000 (ADMIN)
17,825 + 200 (ADMIN)
$170,215
18,025
$188,240
TOTAL
Total Units (See Exhibit D)
Cost Per EDU
4490 EDU
188,240 = $41.93
4490
B. Cost Per EDU for Onsite Improvements (only units contributing to the
onsite facilities pay this fee except Hidden Vista properties)
Total Cost Upsizing
Total Units (See Exhibit E)
Cost Per EDU
$ 37,279
3287 EOU
37,279.50 = $11.34
3281
C. Offsite Reimbursement to Financial Scene
$170,215 - (41.93)(1104 EDU) = $123,924.28
Offsite Reimbursement to City
$18,025 - (41.93)(99) = $13,873.93
Onsite Reimbursement to Financial Scene
$37,279.50
Total Reimbursement to Financial Scene
$123,924.28
$ 37,279.50
$lbl,ZU3./8
WPC 0909E
/i'-//S7Y
EXHIBIT D
RICE CANYON TRUNK SEWER
DWELLING UNITS SERVED
ACRES DU/ AC MAX DUs FACTOR EDU
LA CANADA
218 1-2 367 1.0 436
56.14 3-5 481 1.0 281
5.21 11-18 94 0.6 56
Subtota 1 773
NORTH COLLEGE
32.0 3-5 160 1.0 160
17.67 6-10 177 0.8 142
5.46 11-18 * 60 0.8 48
Subtotal 350
PARKSlDE
33.00 3-5 189 1.0 165
3.0 6-10 30 0.8 24
Subtotal 189
DEL CENTRO
172.51 2-3 518 1.0 518
71.82 3-5 359 1.0 359
22.7 6-10 227 0.8 182
Subtota 1 1059
DEL REY
70.35 3-5 352 1.0 352
28.29 6-10 283 0.8 226
Subtota 1 578
;f-//S71-"
RICE CANYON TRUNK SEWER
DWELLING UNITS SERVED
(Continued)
ACRES DUlAC MAX DUs FACTOR EDU
LADERA
28 3-5 140 1.0 130
8 6-10 80 0.8 64
Subtotal 194
RICE CANYON
Condo's 636 0.8 509
SF 320 1.0 320
Commerc i a 1 136 1.0 136
Apartments 232 0.6 139
Subtotal 1104
EXISTING UNITS WEST OF 805
Windsor Height 56 0.8 45
Windsor Park 44 1.0 44
Subtota 1 99
SUMMARY TOTAL UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO OFFSITE SEGMENT
EDU's
Del Centro 1059
Del Rey 578
Ladera 194
La Canada 773
North Coll ege 350
Parksi de 189
Rice Canyon 1104
Dreyfuss 72
West of 805 (Offsite Only) 99
Commercial at Otay Lakes Rd. 72
4490
I"f - /IS7 ~
SUMMARY TOTAL UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO ONSITE SEGMENT
EDU's
Del Centro 1059
Del Rey 578
Ladera 194
La Canada 773
North Coll ege 350
Parkside 189
Dreyfuss 72
Commercial at Otay Lakes Rd. 72
WPC 0328E
3287
.41/517
I.~
~ ;
.
t
~~z
....'"
cc.
....z
ZZ _
'" '" ..
0....
.....
.....
00"
iK>
.....-
...'"
-zG
..-...
, I!
i i
!
,;~
t2
.,
ao
f<
~
".
~ "
o.
~~
oc
- "
. "
0 ~~
"
~, '"
. ~ ::
~ ~ .u
.
. o.
" ~'O
<
i e'
< , ~
~ H
0 ~i?
, ~ ~
0 ~ <
E ' 0
;;:",
~ . ~
, 0
I I ~O, r../t
I I "', ~ Iu
I I gi ~~ \ (),
II 18 \ :
1!<J . ...,.~ (\
(<,:, ?
h ~\
'. ~ \.
,..... . '.
~o' \. "
ill. 't''\.'
OJ :'1 ",-,
'.
-
'" \.
....,.L~,
... g , I
'" " "" .
:J ~~ Ii! jo iil!;, ,mi! I:
cz~' Hi il hI!. mmi ~ ~
c i~ tV (0) @ ('\ <')
.. fA
;ji
, ~~
: II
. ,
u
i.
I,
a
z
1&1
C!)
1&.1
..J
. ! ~'.
! ,
I ! I
I] 00 OJ
t
c-
..,c ~
.t; z
0.1 .., _ ::)
- .a ==
c!z z
t- 0
...,
-,::I >
>.., z
z. c
..,c u
c::) 1&1
c- u
-::I -
:z: iii C
C
0
.
r 0
e .
e
m ~
~
"
,
0
. e
"
~ >
. ~
z .
.
" 0 >
0 .
, . 0 ~
0 . ,)
< " .
.
!. ~ " ~
"' ,
0
0' ~, , .
u. . I'r
00 ~, 0 oJ
0 LJ ,
"
>
,
I
o
z
c
..
1L.>o
......
Zl:
III..
1111
!LQ
o
"0
1II::r:
>u
IIIZ
QIII(
,D:
~
-...
~III
~
1111:
:1.0
in Ii,
.->-'--1
['
.'
..."
..J-"'~
. , \
- \
....
-
.
-
Z
~
III
~.-(.-
:';:: 'It
g N
o '1J
o
U "
>. i.
G ~:
2 [1
L~ c;
:> ~
a (,
'3
b ~
. ())
.c -.
- '"
~ -
L ~
'" 0
t ,~
/{-I/.s?f/
; ! ~ i ":'1
'rl') .....
. " dti!,I:li
'.jl~l ill flii::
'1""
,,'
J'~'II
.... hr i:
; I~:, i;WII
-.
'j
'~
)
~t
. "
I
I
.
I
.~
~
~
~
~
~
'0
--''; ~.~.~:~:\'\.
~~\ 1, \ " ,':, '\ . "
',,,\,\-\. .
;...:.--- '~ ~~.,
~-
...~
~...
o
t ....
'" '" .....
)o-"t- St ~
~ ii~ ~~ :
."':"'",,, ...
::>...~..O~
'i ~ ~_ :;... 0
....0... ",0 ...
- .. C ..... "'i ':t
... - Co) 1ttU ::t g _
~ .... "'~ "'.. ~
ua ..2........ \
\a>> 0",0 \
\~ \ \i : ~~
,-' " \\' ~ ~
r,.-. \\\ ';'
\ . c '1.
v. ':v., " '"
I' , , \1
.. ., \ %
\~p.
\\ -:s: 4
i~~
,- , I \9
"r~. I ~
',~
,t L
Y/.,
\,
'\
"'-,
""
,."",
...
-
'"
..
..
..
.
...
o
~
..
'"
'"
';
.+ \ ~ ~
. ......~I' 0., '~""I
. ,
J P'
!!~~,
, ,
':~~'
/.-,
- "'~,'
,,-,-:'..,,,
"
','
\"..
--~---?
-
~-
:---.
"
-,',
v_
1
I
.
,.
..
r.~
, :
/' '.
\.
.I
.."-
...
, ,
~ -..
.."'..
,
i
J
,,,,."i
.c-__\~_
\
\
\
\
\
\
---,---,
-
..........:..,
.,,--.-
.'~'
.-'-
,.
~~ !
..,
.'\....
..
.,
1 :
. i
.....\.l ,~ "
" ,
......~
,.,
~_....,
.
;
~ t
~ ~
,
" (f
"
'~
.-<
~
'-'" '.,~ ',i,.
'.
~
'_";'J.",, .
.J
.
~, v"
"
.
~"'"r
','
'2
" <
.'
>~
..'
; ~_.+++
. .:...---1, " ,
--'~ \;
'\ ' \ \
I,
\ .
, , ~ ,. ':"
./f"I'; t..!
",/"", ~-~
.(';, ((,.-,,'
t",~~,~ .i:-",
. 11- ".-... ~ ...., _ ~ .
.'1.....--..' . _. +
" 'r'~;~ ,,..,.; i-"1;
,
~ '
,1
"
" ....
- '.
,>
ir\...:
~f<' ~_
rt~ "" ,_
~...~._-,.