Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1984-11562 Revised 3/14/84 RESOLUTION NO. 11562 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE PRELIMINARY REPORT AND DECLARING INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A SEWER REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the developers of Hidden Vista Village, Financial Scene, have requested that a reimbursement district be formed to provide a means of repayment to them for a portion of the sewer facilities constructed in Rice Canyon, and WHEREAS, a report has been prepared setting forth the reimbursement cost data and the breakdown of those properties that will be assessed, and WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Municipal Code requires a public hearing to consider the establishment of a sewer reimburse- ment district. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the preliminary report for the proposed formation of the Hidden Vista Village sewer reimbursement district (Rice Canyon Trunk) marked Exhibit "A" and attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby set Tuesday, April 3, 1984 at the hour 7:00 p.m., in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California as the date and time for a public hearing to consider the establish- ment of a sewer reimbursement district for Hidden Vista Village. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk be, and she is hereby directed to advertise the public hearing and notify affected persons by mail in accordance with Section 15.50.080 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Presented by Approved as to form by ,I I:, O' " , t.. L / Harron, City ADOPTED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 13th 84 , by the following vote, to-wit: day of March ES: Councilmen Malcolm, Cox, Moore, McCandliss YES: Councilmen None ISTAIN: Cot.rIcilmen None SENT: Councilmen Scott Mayor TEST Jb~-<:e,~J*F:.r~ V City Clerk R~ City of Chula Vista ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) 'UNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) S s. 'Y OF CHULA VISTA ) I, JENNIE M. FULASZ, CMC, CITY CLERK of the City of Chula Vista, California, I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of RESOLUTION NO. 11562 ,and that the same has not been amended or repealed. TED City Clerk ( seal) ;-660 REPORT HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE SEWER REIMBURSEMENT RICE CANYON TRUNK EXHiBn A I. PURPOSE The purpose of this report is to present a methodology by which Financial Scenes, developers of Hidden Vista Village (Terra Nova), and the City can be reimbursed for offsite and oversizing of the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer. I I. Background City Council by Resolution Number 10081-A approved the Tentative Map for Hidden Vista Village, Chu1a Vista Tract 80-15. As a condition of approval, the developer (Financial Scene Inc.) was required to construct offsite sewer facilities between the western subdivision boundary and the Spring Valley Outfall. They were also required to upsize onsite facilities to accommodate future construction to the east. The City, through an agreement with the State of California constructed a segment of the Rice Canyon Sewer in conjunction with the 1-805 freeway. On August 11, 1981, Council directed the City Manager to begin proceedings for the formation of the reimbursement district requested by the developer. Said direction was contingent upon receipt of a deposit to cover City costs. That deposit was received on November 23, 1982. A pre1 iminary district was set up early in 1983; however, the processing of the district was postponed with submittal of the Specific Plan proposal by the Gersten Companies. In January 1984 McMillan, managers of the Hidden Vista Village project (now Terra Nova) requested that the re imbursement be processed based upon the present 1y approved E. R. D.R. Specific Plan. McMillan does not want the reimbursement to be revised should the densities be increased by the recently submitted Gersten proposal. This preliminary reimbursement district is now before Council to receive public testimony. The parties affected by the reimbursement d i s tri ct have been not i fi ed of th i s heari ng in accordance with Code requirements. II 1. GENERAL DISCUSSION A. Determination of Costs. The costs 1 isted in Exhibit A are broken down into categories of offsite and onsite. Unit costs were obtained from actual contract prices included in a bid by Signs and Pinnick Inc. dated March 30, 1981. Lump-sum costs have been verified by the Engineering Department. Quant it i es were obta i ned from approved plans for the Hidden Vista Village subdivision and verified by the Engineering Department. ;i?-IISh.:L City costs were obtained from charges paid by the City to the State for work relative to the portion of Rice Canyon Trunk sewer constructed with 1-805. B. Determination of Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU) Weighting factors have been used to relate the reimbursement required to be paid to actual usage of the facilities. The City's Environmental Review procedures were used relative to sewage generation. A single family with 3.38 persons per dwelling unit was used as a basis for an equivalent dwell ing unit. All other types of dwellings are shown to have less people per dwelling unit. Per capita sewage generation is considered the same for all types of dwelling units. Single family attached homes (condos) are considered to house 2.66 people per dwelling and multiple family (apartments) are considered to house 1.94 people per dwelling. The weighting factor for single family attached and multiple family dwelling was calculated from the ratio of people per dwelling divided by the number of people per dwelling for single family detached units. Each was rounded up to the nearest tenth. Consequently, the factors used to cmpute EDU's for single family attached (6-10 du/acre) and multiple family (11-18 du/acre) are less than one. The number of EDU' s to be charged against the commercial area in the Rice Canyon SPA was estimated based upon County of San Diego Ordinance No.9 and the City's Environmental Review procedures. See Exhibit B. C. Determination of Reimbursable Amounts Offsite and Onsite of Hidden Vi sta Vi 11 age: 1. Offsite Costs All costs associated with the offsite sewer construction have been included in the reimbursable amount. The amount to be reimbursed by properties other than the constructing developer will be the difference between the total cost and the developer's share of the construction cost. Reimbursement to the City is the amount represented by the actual cost of sewer facilities constructed less monies paid into the Rice Canyon Sewer District fund by previous developments less the fair share of the units west of 1-805 which did not contribute to the Trunk Sewer. See Exhibit C. 2. Onsite Costs The Hidden Vista Vi llage development of itself would require construction of an 8-inch sewer line. Upsizin9 is provided to accommodate serv i ce to ups tream deve 1 opments. On ly the upsizing from the required 8-inch sewer line was included in the reimbursable costs. All other onsite costs were considered to be required to serve the development and are not included. See Exhibit C. -2- ~ -/lIt )-- D. Determination of Parcels to be Included in the Reimbursement Plan: All parcels within the del ineated basin shown on Exhibit "D" were included in the calculations except those presently existing developments which had been required to pay into the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer Fund, school and park sites, and parcels either using septic systems or likely to use septic systems. School and park sites were not included because users would otherwise be assessed at their place of residence, and thereby eliminate the possibility of double assessment. The existing developments were not included in the dwelling unit total because they had previously paid into the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer Fund. The dwell ing units west of 1-805 were included because no contribution was made by those developments to the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer Fund. The fee for those units has been subtracted from the City total cost of facilities constructed, thereby reducing the reimbursable amount due. Parcels in the Lynwood Hi lIs area whether occupied by dwell ing units or vacant have not been considered in the dwelling unit totals. Parcels with existing units are on septic tanks and may never connect. Vacant parcels are small in number and may be a 11 owed to use sept i c systems as we 11. Shoul d any of the parce 1 s in the Lynwood Hills area connect in the future, they will be charged the same as other connecting dwellings and the funds deposited in the City's general fund. The number of equivalent dwelling units was calculated by using the highest density of the density range shown on the El Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan times the acreages for that density range. The current specific plan submittal by the Gersten Companies indicates higher density than the present specific plan. McMillan has indicated that they wish to have this reimbursement agreement approved based upon the presently approved specific plan with no revision in the amount to be paid for each SPA if density is increased. E. Methodology: The same basic methodology used in the Casa Del Rey Reimbursement District was used in this district for the type of improvements considered. Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code discusses offsite and excess capacity relative to reimbursement. During the processing of the Cas a Del Rey District it was determi ned that offs ite improvement costs shoul d be spread between all benefited properties including the development which constructed the facilities. Onsite improvements were considered on the basis of excess improvements or improvements constructed beyond what was needed by the development to serve itself. Equivalent dwelling units were determined by the method stated in IIIB of this report. See Exhibit D. -3- /{ - //56 ')/ F. Applicability of Assessment: The assessments calculated for this district shall be charged any properties within or adjacent to the service area as delineated on Exhibit D which are served by the subject trunk sewer, whether through gravity flow, by pumping or by virtue of land grading. G. Interest to be Added: To the base cost per equivalent dwelling unit there will be added simple interest at 7 percent per annum to be charged at the time of issuance of bui Iding permits or connection to the subject trunk sewer. The interest shall be calculated on a quarterly basis commencing on the date Council forms the district by resolution. Six percent wi 11 be payable to the entities entitled to re i mbursement and one percent to the City to cover admi n i strat i ve costs up until the maximum term of reimbursement in accordance with Chapter 15.50 of the Municipal Code which states that the reimbursement charges shall thereafter be deposited into the general fund of the City. H. Term of Reimbursement: Max imum term of the Re i mbursement Agreement is proposed to be 20 years. I. Order of Reimbursement: The facilities constructed first which are subject to reimbursement wi 11 be repa i din the chrono log i ca 1 order of construct ion. Therefore, facil ities constructed and paid for by the City having been first constructed will be reimbursed first. Consequently the funds in the existing sewer account have been credited to the City in determining the remaining amount to be reimbursed to the City. J. Time of Reimbursement: Reimbursement charges shall be calculated and collected prior to issuance of a building permit. IV. CONCLUSION The proposed reimbursement district encompasses the entire gravity basin shown on Exhibit D. Parcels included in calculation of the reimbursable amount are those which could reasonably be expected to connect to the subject sewer within the term of the reimbursement agreement. A parcel connect i ng to the subj ect trunk sewer wi 11 be charged the ca leu 1 ated reimbursement charge plus interest whether or not that parcel is included in the determination of the reimbursement charge. -4- If - /I)~ l/ Reimbursement charges for each development shall be determined on the basis of equivalent dwelling units within that development. Costs were either derived from actual bid prices or confirmed by the Engineering Department. Chapter 15.50 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code was followed in determi ni ng the amount of interest to be paid; the 1 ength of time the reimbursement agreement will be in effect; the improvements to be included and the process to be followed. Order of reimbursement was based upon the chronological sequence of construction of the facilities. WAU:vt WP C 0325E -5- 1<~//S6 2 EXHIBIT A I. REIMBURSABLE COST A. Offsite Sewer Costs Paid by Financial Scene Description Unit Unit Cost Total 18" PVC 2421 LF 33.00 79,893.00 15" PVC 2043 LF 20.00 40,860.00 Manholes 16 Ea 970.00 15,520.00 Encasement 18" PVC 334 LF 16.17 5,401.00 Encasement 4-8" PVC 20 LF 16.17 323.00 Connect to Exist Stub 1 Ea 128.00 128.00 Connect to Exist MH 2 Ea 715.00 1,430.00 Repave Street Surface 360 LF 3.50 1,260.00 18" PVC Steel Pipe Encase 20 LF 20.00 400.00 145,2Ib.OO Engineering 15,000.00 Grading 5,000.00 $165,215.00 City Costs 3,000.00 TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICT $168,215.00 B. Offsite Sewer Costs Paid by City of Chula Vista Description Unit Unit Cost Total 15" PVC 858 LF 20.00 17,160.00 Manholes 2 Ea 2,500.00 5,000.00 Misc Iron 720 Lbs 0.40 288.00 Plug Pipe 2 Ea 100.00 200.00 Encasement 15" 197.4 Cy 75.00 14,805.00 TOT AL 37,453.00 Less Funds in Rice Canyon Sewer Fund 19,628.00 TOTAL TO BE ASSESSED IN DISTRICT $17,825.00 C. Cost of Upsizing Within Hidden Vista Village 1. Difference in Cost (Constructed - Required) a. 15 Inch PVC 15" PVC 8" PVC $20.00 LF $12.00 LF Total Within Subdivision 3168 LF Cost of Upsizing $ 8.00 LF /(-I/..J~'? EXHIBIT A (continued) 2. 12" pve 12" PVC 8" PVC Cost of Upsizing $17.50 LF $12.00 LF $ 5.50 LF Total Within Subdivision 2886 LF D. Total On-site Reimbursable Cost Hidden Vista Village (Terra Nova) 1. 15" PVC (3168 LF) ($8.00) = 12" (2886 LF) ($5.50) = TOTAL = 2. $25,344 $15,873 $41,217 EXHIBIT B A. Determination of Weighting Factors Single Family Single Family Attrched Duplex Multiple Family Example: Single Family Attached WPC 0909E 1<-1/:/6 l- 3.38 People/DU 2.66 People/DU 2.5 1.94 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.6 2.66 = 0.8 ~ EXHIBIT C A. Cost Per EDU for Offsite Improvements Hidden Vista Village $168,215 + ADMIN 2000 $170,215 City of Chula Vista 17,825 + ADMIN 200 18,025 TOTAL $188,240 Total Units (See Exhibit E) 4418 EDU Cost Per EDU 188,240 = $42.61 4418 B. Cost Per EDU for Onsite Improvements Total Cost Upsizing $ 41,217 Total Units (See Exhibit E) 3215 EDU Cost Per EDU 41,217 = $12.82 3215 C. Offsite Reimbursement to Financial Scene $170,215 - (42.61)(1104 EDU) = $123,173.56 Offsite Reimbursement to City $18,025 - (42.61)(99) = $13,806.61 Onsite Reimbursement to Financial Scene $41,217 Total Reimbursement to Financial Scene $123,173.56 $ 41,217.00 $164,390.~6 WPC 0909E /? -//.Jb L EXHIBIT D RICE CANYON TRUNK SEWER DWELLING UNITS SERVED ACRES DUlAC MAX DUs FACTOR EDU LA CANADA 218 1-2 367 1.0 436 56.14 3-5 481 1.0 281 5.21 11-18 94 0.6 56 Subtotal 773 NORTH COLLEGE 32.0 3-5 160 1.0 160 17.67 6-10 177 0.8 142 5.46 11-18 * 60 0.8 48 Subtotal 350 PARKS IDE 33.00 3-5 189 1.0 165 3.0 6-10 30 0.8 24 Su btota 1 189 DEL CENTRO 172.51 2-3 518 1.0 518 71.82 3-5 359 1.0 359 22.7 6-10 227 0.8 182 Subtota 1 1059 DEL REY 70.35 3-5 352 1.0 352 28.29 6-10 283 0.8 226 Subtota 1 578 1<- (IS&' 2- RICE CANYON TRUNK SEWER DWELLING UNITS SERVED (Continued) ACRES Dj,ljAC MAX DUs FACTOR EDU ,. ~ . . ~ LADERA 28 3-5 140 1.0 130 8 6-10 80 0.8 64 Subtotal 194 RICE CANYON Condo's 636 0.8 509 SF 320 1.0 320 Commercial 136 1.0 136 Apartments 232 0.6 139 Subtota 1 1104 EXISTING UNITS WEST OF 805 Windsor Hei9ht 56 0.8 45 windsor Park 44 1.0 44 Subtota 1 99 SUMMARY TOTAL UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO OFFSITE SEGMENT EDU's ~ Del Centro 1059 Del Rey 578 L adera 194 La Canada 773 North College 350 Parkside 189 Rice Canyon 1104 Dreyfuss 72 West of 805 (Offsite Only) 99 ~ 4418 /? -//,,-(. 'l SUMMARY TOTAL UNITS CONTRIBUTING TO ONSITE SEGMENT Del Centro Del Rey Ladera La Canada North College Parkside Dreyfuss /< ~//J6 2- EDU's 1059 578 194 773 350 189 72 3215 ~ \ ' , 1 \ \ i \ \ 1 , :!~i. ,in'i' ; ~ ,/ j,~~':I 1j,~~.. -" C ~\ ~\\~\ i\\~\t\ \ A: n h!1': ~!!~~.~, ~ ;~ ?" 0@ @ l') \ . , ~ , ~ ~ \ . mOO m ill b 0:;- \II" ~ .,2: \Ii \II - ::> Cf)O ~ .... o4~ 2: '= ~\II 0 - -.$ )- '~_ ~\II 2: 2: Cf) 4 \II ~~ :s ," O~ Co) -- - s tit 0:; 0:; \ , , \ \ \ ,0=<< \ '2. ('\\ ~ (!) o - u '4 ?:~ "C~ ~~ rt f, if, C .- fo, ? - o ,) -0 fjif!. . "' ~ -, - '" t:- - "<' ' ~', cr ", , '1,.11 ' l,' , . . 1\.1.\1\\ \~\\, <."~'~ \ \ II\! j ,~,~, I, \ ' " ....1 j 1"\',1\ ",'''',1' "- '\ U i \ i i ~ ,t , -,.. " . ^ " \ :\::. to ... ,.. ,... 'i ....:0 44.. " " ... ...... - :> :> .. ,,0 .. ..... ...... <>0" - - . .."':0- ......- .. ... :J ~ -::r:" 0-'" .~ ;" "' 00 l~ 0 "~ ~ '" 0" \II , " ,. C!) D" T.' " \II 1 ., i' .I ,,>::, J . ~? " ~;-' . . , . D" , " ~~ ., , , i ~ , ~i . J ,. . ~~ T , " . t, ~ . ~~ " " <' J , t " ." ~ " . " , . >P I! .i iJ " .. " > . , c , \\~,J\ , I wi Jw \ , \ ~ \~ " \1 \ \ \~ \ f .. ,,~.~-..,.. ;> t ,'\, " ~ .'~,. ,W 'v '1'j' ','- -,0 "'-, t,:,~t,,\. \. , ., ' .~ ._' ^,. L'::'. '.if , , I ; . " ~ . , . '.' t i <;! ~ 0 .... ~ '" \ 1; ~i; <i. '" it ~~,', ~ ... ~ ~ lit" I ,.. t ~~, \ ~,! ~ ,,' " o 00 00 ~, I \ / y\ - ' \ .' ^~ "';?~ 1/!J6J z..-. .....-'" .. .. -'-..,.' ~~,~_~.J, .1'>>' :.: ...~' t- .. ',;-.' ;i.' .:.....vi.~ ...;.-!- \~;.~~}. " \.~- 'J)' }1 r-, I, -" ~P.: ~\ .... i -/ ,.,~#J ./ , ~ ~. .\ \ \ I \ .\ ~"'--" - . ' \_._-------------\.-. \ ,/ \ .f \ I '\ 1/-- \../., ,J . r ,. l (~ 1--"1' I ) \ \ \ i \\ .' .l \\ ~\ t \ \" .. r"\ fit \ CD' '" \. ~ ' I d ~~ .(')..O~!. n;Z. ~'"" a- $c::"'$"04 0""'" '" 0'" 1ft'" C1'- "..c,.o~~ - s...II( ~ ~ c::- 0 .. ~,. ~~. 0 ~~ ~. ~ ~ ....."'"c::o O4~ ~-~ .... $".( ,.- ... 004 - ..,. ~ .. ,. .. ~.( '" . .( - " .._.._._....--~-\ ._d", " ..-_..... " .. ..c .. to o . ' ,". '1 ;;1.J~~ .~ c_ ' "\,-----C"\.,,. J.--- ";. . _:/,r[~ . . ' ~'--:, .'~? " )'----.' .... -- , ",,,,."' ;' .....:,." .- 0-~1t;"l -..,-" ,:.- , ' ,,- . , I,"" .\ 1.'" ~ - ". . I . t, , , ':!,.. '. ,'... ~~' . ~~ l' , .. "'i . ~ ....'t ,,' ~ ~t>' '. , ;. .- /_;:.~'B-. 'J--;:/f --...:.--; .. :~ ", .t-...,,:~:~' ,,-,/ " ./~.. .... ....,-". I' " '. ,~ ; .; .",.,~ ~ ,-'"'... t. '\ ',;. !1 ~ ; ',..,.,'rS- .\ - - . ' ,I" . I . . .\-" . \\ '-: "'I.i ~\ r\: .~,~..}:\}:. .\ '. ':r.~ ... 1< ~ /!Jb z. , .