The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutReso 2005-102 RESOLUTION NO. 2005-102 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER II SUPPLEMENTAL SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA I. RECITALS. A. Project Site WHEREAS, the areas of land which are the subject of this resolution are diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" and hereto incorporated herein by this resolution, and commonly known as the Design District Overlay within the EastLake Business Center, and for the purposes of general description consists of approximately 36 acres located at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Fenton Street/Showroom Place (formerly Girard Court) ("Project Site"); and B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the proposed amendments to the EastLake Business Center II Supplemental SPA Planned Community (PC) District Regulations and Land Use District Map and Design Guidelines to: 1) add a new section to the PC District Regulations clarifying the allowable land uses for businesses located within a newly created Design District Overlay, 2) amend the Design Guidelines to add a new section containing sign guidelines applicable only for those businesses located within the Design District Overlay ("Project"); and C. Prior Discretionary Approvals WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various entitlements, including: 1) a General Plan Amendment, General Development Plan and Sectional Planning Area Plan and associated Design Guidelines, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Comprehensive Affordable Housing Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2002-264 on July 23, 2002; and 2) Planned Community District Regulations approved by Ordinance No. 22863 on August 6, 2002; and D. Planning Commission Record of Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project on February 23, 2005, and after hearing staff presentation and public testimony voted 5-0-1 to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below; and E. City Council Record of Application WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project applications and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior boundaries of the Project Sites at least ten days prior to the hearing. F. City Council Hearing Resolution 2005-102 Page 2 WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City Council on March 8, 2005 on this Project; and WHEREAS, the hearing was continued to March 22, 2005. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby find, detennine and resolve as follows: II. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA. The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has detennined that the proposed project was adequately covered in the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for the EastLake II General Development Plan (GDP) and EastLake I Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan Amendments (IS-00-03) and the associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Thus, no further environmental review or documentation is necessary. III. SPA FINDINGS! APPROVAL. A. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) PLANS (AS AMENDED) ARE IN CONFORMITY WITH THE EASTLAKE II GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN. The proposed amendments to the sign guidelines do not affect the adopted EastLake II General Development Plan nor the Chula Vista General Plan. The amendments only involve the addition of specific sign guidelines unique to a design district which will allow additional needed signage beyond what is currently allowed within the Eastlake Business Center. Furthennore, the proposed amendments to said sign regulations will only affect the 36 acres within the Business Center which contain the Design District Overlay. B. THE SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA PLANS WILL PROMOTE THE ORDERLY SEQUENTIALIZED DEVELOPMENT OF THE INVOLVED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREAS. The "Project" will help promote the orderly development of the Eastlake II Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan. Allowing additional signage to meet the needs of home improvement type businesses which locate within the newly established design district overlay area will encourage said businesses to locate therein and, thereby, help promote the development of this 36 acre area located near the southeast comer of the EastLake Business Center. The Project Site traverses all three sides of a cul-de-sac street. It is further anticipated that the development will attract other businesses into the business center. C. THE EASTLAKE CENTER II SUPPLEMENTAL SPA, AS AMENDED, WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT ADJACENT LAND USE, RESIDENTIAL ENJOYMENT, CIRCULATION OR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. The "Project" will provide for the unique signage needs of tenants who occupy space within the design district. The proposed guidelines allow additional signage than typically allowed in the business center due to the uniqueness of the "design district" concept within the business center. Development of specific sign guidelines for the design district will allow more flexibility than what is typically allowed within the business park and yet is still restrictive Resolution 2005-102 Page 3 enough to maintain the character of a business center and safeguard the area from becoming more retail oriented. In this regard, staff has recommended certain reductions in the amount of signage proposed by the applicant in order to safeguard the integrity of the business center concept and not allowing the type of allowable signage to transition towards more retail orientation. Allowing for a larger monument sign is appropriate given both the need for additional signage for the anchor tenants as well as the location of said sign being along a major thoroughfare along the southeast entrance to the business center. The major combination of site location, surrounding slopes and major thoroughfare to the south provide the necessary buffers to insure that the additional signage allowed for the design center will not negatively impact existing residential development to the north, east and south. D. IN THE CASE OF PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL AND RESEARCH USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION, AND OVERALL DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARE SUCH AS TO CREATE A RESEARCH OR INDUSTRIAL ENVIRONMENT OF SUSTAINED DESIRABILITY AND STABILITY; AND, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL MEET PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ESTABLISHED BY THIS TITLE. The amendments do not involve areas planned for industrial or research uses. E. IN THE CASE OF INSTITUTIONAL, RECREATIONAL, AND OTHER SIMILAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THAT SUCH DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROPRIATE IN AREA, LOCATION AND OVER-ALL PLANNING TO THE PURPOSE PROPOSED, AND THAT SURROUNDING AREAS ARE PROTECTED FROM ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS FROM SUCH DEVELOPMENT. The amendments do not involve these Institutional, Recreational or similar uses. F. THE STREET AND THOROUGHFARES PROPOSED ARE SUITABLE AND ADEQUATE TO CARRY THE ANTICIPATED TRAFFIC THEREON. The City's Traffic Engineering Section had determined that since the proposed uses and corresponding sign provisions are simply further refinements of already permitted uses within the EastLake Business Center, no additional traffic studies are required. G. ANY PROPOSED COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT CAN BE JUSTIFIED ECONOMICALLY AT THE LOCATION (S) PROPOSED AND WILL PROVIDE ADEQUATE COMMERCIAL FACILITIES OF THE TYPES NEEDED AT SUCH PROPOSED LOCATION (S). The EastLake proposed amendment is consistent with certain commercial uses already allowed in the SPA. H. THE AREA SURROUNDING SAID DEVELOPMENT CAN BE PLANNED AND ZONED IN COORDINATION AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPATIBILITY WITH SAID DEVELOPMENT. The "Project" will be confined to 36 acres located at the southeast portion of the EastLake Business Park. The area is to be developed is fairly isolated from the remainder of the Resolution 2005-102 Page 4 business park. As a result, the surrounding vacant parcels within the business park can be developed in the same fashion as existing business developments. I. IN LIGHT OF THE FINDINGS ABOVE, THE CITY COUNCIL DOES HEREBY APPROVE THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER II SUPPLEMENTAL SPA AMENDMENT AS SHOWN IN EXHIBIT "B." IV. SPA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to approval of any business license within the 36 acre design district overlay, the applicant must apply for and receive approval of a Master Use Pennit in accordance with the provisions established by these amendments. 2. Tables and exhibits in the EastLake Business Center II Supplemental SPA Plan must be modified to reflect the proposed amendments. Prior to submittal of application for the required Master Conditional Use Pennit, the applicant shall submit 20 copies of amended documents for review and approval by the Director of Planning and Building. 3. All other conditions of any previous resolutions affecting the EastLake Business Center II Supplemental SPA shall remain in full force and effect. V. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the forgoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, and any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to the their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of shall future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, instituted and prosecute litigate or compel their compliance or seek damages for their violations. No vested rights are gained by developer or successor in interest by the City approval of this resolution. VI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption ofthis resolution is dependent upon enforceability of each and every tenn provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are detennined by the Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, if the City so detennines in its sole discretion, this resolution shall be deemed to be revoked and no further in force or in effect. Resolution 2005-102 Page 5 Presented by Approved as to form by .d\ &\(~ \\ ~"'',).X'q'í ~ , Ann Moore City Attorney PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista, California, this 22nd day of March, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers: Castaneda, Davis, McCann, and Rindone NAYS: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: Padilla ATTEST: ----- ~. Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Susan Bigelow, City Clerk of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2005-102 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 22nd day of March, 2005. Executed this 22nd day of March, 2005. ~ ~- ~.Susan Bigelow, MMC, City Clerk EXHIBIT A l\;o,'~~l / ,'r:r(>,\~ /r"J. '~-r, t::::Çr&-:, /.,~"<'';.:\ ..... '.. ¡ '!-Ct-~ (''-' 1::i ,~x ·~0v¿·rh< ." '/,) .'r,~.-, , iT\\Y"f ¡...¡ "./'/.) /0...........-v '.,.. '''''''-;'''//['//'''.1 '\ : .G, ..~~.. ~ I /...;("',·'('1..-\/1--'\",.........-;:....-':..//';(l "/'{I/I ¿;:.' rN \ ~...~ I ~..¡t::f\.\~t?t::l.'..-7/:'. .~!.....I'" 'ij;:_~;': \ 1---..-.-....1 Ji/\ 'j 'i'<. ¡...,"!r..:--~. 'v::VI~/){Ì":;.·~<.) //;;0'· '. \ \'<';88d' { ~ I 'N t;-N , ........ A.,I'" V /lffJ/ ~. i\ ~. I ,f@,I(".J."( ~'-< 'Æ' Æ~\ ·.//I"¡!f\r,..\'j'·,·,(\,,·,\,yl/ ...,~"... '\ '\'" Çj'1 : .t=;j., '-I/',L.:;) "·mrt\\·/·' §" /\,\\. V". 1r-!/, .~ j'-"Ýì '<-~~1Lu/.J;¿// li..o \ \ / \ ,\ '.......... . Q: , ¡IIIIII'IIrt:.~ '¿0~'01 \" \ \ '( '\,\.Ç·i\ :::::, , , , , \ \ "Vii IIU 'r\\ '\ .:....:..~ 1,' ) \ \ \ '.. I '-.- \ \ ". "" I ./,. \' . , " I'"" \ " \ ".",: - ....rd .Jú~'.\ \\ JI:ll \i &~\\\\ "\\ i 'Ç,~~ \.'. \\ , ...-';\:)-' ~ \ \. \\ I ,\ '?.\~y~ \( ,\ l \ \\ - '?';.:?10 '-X. \ \ II I \! '~.A0 \\\ \\ 'I \ . '<'Y-C;'!;~" '. " \ \. \! . ¡' I ,~,"I"'.;~:I), '. " \. \./' , ~------, I ,/'>Ýv,<!)/, .' . L___ .----.;:::;;! L- ; ·v·ç.t;. ''''-: \ \. \ / ~ 11r\1 ( ;"'" -- ",¡/j~ \~\/Ç\'<%;%1:.~~\\~",:~ç \ \ " l r... "'/" -0 \,' ,,/ \ " \ v.:/! ' .#, \ \ . , .. .?-~'.ç..,;X;'ó<Í'-h \ \. .v\ \, } \ ~V>X:.I·"~·n-\~ \ \ \ ~\ \l~ 91':'" ,; ~r1\\ \ ._....J..--;;~, ~ þ, I' r-'~ I'! \ /........~ ~~ .,I.j. I. NI'-"rl I' k ~~\NJí_, \. "-"r ~,:~~<i,,~11~"1èhÈi /. '\ ~'~-"Î j'ô L~ rI! rn-", 7 ;¡¡~~, \0- f::t/j;/ç¡ í , W~íî~ì 9 Q1J]'"' ""'<'!.ør.: ~'i0 $(,j,"'(y/::; J ! 'V:"""'\\ ,,~ ~~\ ..v;, -'^-i ! I .J.;;-v ;..,\ m '''ì ~-~}, ···':<{ïY / / w Av' ~r:I¡JIIIJI¡I¡r;;t . ~r.:~i' '~~.J ,/ ,/ l~~~~\\f.)lll.llLO~lillililt\B. \. "~b¡;~¿:)'" ..-..../ '\'>~~'0\ \íÍJ]IJ1D .ç..,,!~~ ~~~ ) .. \ I't::;.:,~~,y...... \.... - 'Ç(.."-:.>,.§J .> ~~'/ ...', '. ''''''''Y''''~' ~~ """,> "~,I ,'.. ,~-:;',. "'f;~. " "-;"""'.'~'''' It'i~.... i:"V '.... /:\Jí.' , 3f¡i':>~'~ '..t.,,\\~,~{ ',...'r.://:} f!i:-.,,'f}!/....í~^'¢~, " ..... WJ. 0(,..... '''\/, j~"", t:::1' t:¡j f'/ ~:~ <'yv d$,':¿ ~'"i:i'/.. " ..~, ./~\~:;,~]'..:,~' \"f.:~.¡S':i..'...,.;...\> j,~"I IJ$Y: /./:..,.. LEGEND ~_.~,$.\,\\ '....~........,,! '-.J '," ;\\\~\ ~~,' 'i.V..\- :......-.....~.., ~ ~.:-\.^ I, '~' ''::1' 1:', ~..,¡¡ "'I\.~~I/ .. ..\" ....'<,.., , """"'Í' ,/,»-" ~I' (::j ~''''. ¡.;~- "L(~'" {«\,'I> L..I Projectlocation ~\\.! ;~\\\'~~,:)'\",~~íì ,......; ~ \'~ ~,:~:.1-/ "'~'Ji.,~//\"~ " \ \ : LOCATOR MAP , EXHIRIT B Design Guidelines for EastLake Business Center IT Supplemental SPA Approved November 16,1999 by Resolution No.19666 Proposed Amendment to add Signing Guidelines for the Design District 113/05 Amendment Sponsored by: International Real Estate 2297 Niels Bohr Court, Suite 210 San Diego, CA 92154 (619) 661-6681 Contact: Michael A. Vogt Master Developer: The EastLake Company 900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100 Chula Vista, California 91914 (619) 421-0127 Contact: Bill Ostrem Prepared by: Cinti Land Planning 2932 Poinsettia Drive San Diego, California 92106 (619) 2-23-7408 Contact: Gary Cinti SECTION ITA DESIGN GUIDELL.'ŒS TABLE OF CONTENTS Pil!Z~ IIA.l Introduction IIA.l.l purpose 1-1 II.4.2 Design Review Process IIA.2.l Introduction II.4.2.2 Design Review by Master Developer IIA.2.3 City of Chula Vista Design Review IIA.2.2 Zoning.Administrator Design Review IIA.2.3 Design Review Committee IIA2A Appeals II-2 II-I II-3 II-3 II-3 II-3 IIA.3 Business Center Design Guidelines II.4.3.1 Site Planning -Planned Community District Regulations -Site Planning -Building Heights _Circulation & Parking -Service & Storage Areas -Community Fencing -Combmed Wall imd Fence Guidelmes -Fences and Walls -Utilities, Antennae and Flagpoles -Grading Standards . ill-I IIA.3.2 Architecture -Building Massing -Building Entries -Colors and Materials -TeXtures -Equipment Screening -Building Materials -ArtISculpture ill-9 IIA.3.3 Lighting -Safety/SeC1JIÌty Lightmg _ArchitecturallLandscape Lighting ill-I 0 ~ ~ 1-14-05 - ~ -~-~---- ~-----_. 11.4.3.4 Sign Program -Approval & Submittal -General Standards -Maintenance _Illumination -Hardware -Prohibited Sign Types and Components -S ign Criteria Summary -Sign Types and Descriptions . 11.4.3.5 Prohibited Sign Types and Components 1I.4.3.6 Sign Criteria Summary for Business Center II 4.3.7 Sirn Ciiteria for Desi!ID District Overlav ll.4.4 Landscape Design IT.4A.l Purpose 11.404.2 Landscape Concept IIAA3 Lañdscaping Requirements II.4.4A Street Landscaping IT.4.4.5 SlopelErosion Control IIAA.6 Landscape and Inigation Standards_ IIAA.7 Landscape Maintenance IIA.4.8 Special Master Landscape Plan lI.4.S Individual Lot Design Criteria II.4.5.llndividual Lot Criteria ITA.5.2 Organization of the Criteria : ~1-14-û5 .' ID-lO ill-12 ill-I 3 ill-30 IV-I IV-I IV-4 "IV-8 IV-9 IV-IO IV-ll IV-I 6 V-I V-I LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit I Site P lannip.g Exhibit 2 Parking Standards Exhibit 3 Fencing Types Exhibit 4 Combination Wall & Fence .... Exhibit 5 Building Mounted Sign Exhibit 6 Mounted Sign Letters Exhibit 7 Mounted Sign Letter Size Exhibit 8 Freestanding Monument Sign Exhibit 9 Signing Site Distance Exhibit 10 Sign Panels Exhibit 11 Sign Panels Exhibit 12 Entry Window Graphics Exhibit 13 Building Address Numbers Exhibit 14 ConstroctionlLeasing Sign Exhibit 15 Vehicle Direction Sign., Exhibit ISA Design District Sign Locations by TV1Je P::UlC III-2 IIIA III-6 ill-? ill-II ill-l2 ill-13 ill-I 5 ill-16 "ill-18 ill-19 III-20 III-23 ill-25 ill-26 ill-31 Exhibit I 5A- I District Identification Monument - Sign TV1Je "An ill-33 Exhibit 15A-2 District Entrv Monument - Sign TV1Je "B" III-35 Exhibit 15A-3 Tenant Identification Sign - Sign TV1Je "cn III-37 Exhibit 15A-4 Proiect Directional SiQ:n - SiQ:Il TV1Je "D" III-39 Exhibit 15A-5 BuilclinQ: Signs III-41 Exhibit 16 Scenic Highway Sketch Exhl'bit 17 Entry Monument Sketch Exhibit 18 Thematic Corridor Exhibit 19 General Landscape Plan Exhibit 20 Business Center Trees , ~1·14-05 IV-2 T" - p-~ N~ rV-5 '1'i-7 Exhibit 2\ Landscape Intensity 1'/-9 Exhib it '22 Plant Material Matrix IV-14 Exhibit 23 Scope of Special Master Landscape Plan IV-18 Exhibit 24 Building Envelopes - Lots 1-6 V-2 Exhibit 25 Building Architecture - Lots 1-6 VI-3 Exhibit 26 Building Envelopes - Lots 7-9 V-4 ." Exhibit 27 Building Architecture - Lots 7-9 V-4 Exhibit 28 Building Envelopes - Lots 12-16 V-5 Exhibit 29 Building Architecture - Lots 12-16 V-6 Exhibit 30 Key Map - Lot 1 V-7 Exhibit 31 Key Map - Lot 2 V-8 Exhibit 32 Key Map - Lot 3 nV-9 Exhibit 33 Key Map - Lot 4 V-10 Exhibit 34 Key Map - Lot 5 V-II Exhibit 35 Key Map - Lot 6 V-12 Exhibit 36 Key Map - Lot 7 V-13 Exhibit 37 Key Map - Lot 8 V-14 Exh1'bit 38 Key Map - Lot 9 V-IS Exhibit 39 Key Map - Lot 10 V-16 Exhibit 40 Key Map - Lot 11 V-17 Exhibit 41 Key Map - Lot 12 V-18 Exhibit 42 Key Map - Lot 13 V-19 Exhibit 43 Key Map - Lot 14 V,20 Exh1'bit 44 Key Map - Lot IS V-2l Exh1'bit 45 Key Map - Lot 16 V-21 t6-!!-99 1- ¡ 4-05 Signs employing noise-making devices and components. Signs with no returns and exposed fastenings. Rooftop signs. Post and pand-type signs (exœpt temporary signs). II.4.4.4.2 No sign, notic: or oth:r lettering shall be exhibited or affixed on any part of any building e;tcept. as specifically ap.proved in writing by th~þstLake Company. Sign Criteria Summary ~ Specific sign types will be permined only with design:lled building types. as described in the Sign Criteria Summary matrix on the fol1owing page. Building type shall be determined by the EastLake Company. wh.ich decision is final. Listed celow are the building type defini1Ìons utilized in the matrix. . BuiIdi'Dl! Mounted Signs , I t 5TR. NG\ ..L RM :;t'-O- 1 T / / . I ! I I ! ..' 1 / r r Exhibit 5 Only one tman! name per building permitted. utilizing metal reverse channel numbers. Example illustrates the maximum height permitted for all cap lctterforms. · Note: Refer to S~cti07! JI../.3, .7/'or sir", criteria.wíthil1 the Desi,"" District overlcrv area. ¡ 6·S ,9 1-14-05 III-I 3 (Note: This document includes only the te.."t and e.'thibits to be added) II 4.3.7 Sign Criteria far Design District The purpose of this section is to address some specific signs far the Design District, as established in the EastLake II Planned Co=unity District Remlatians. in the event that these criteria do o.at address any particular sign canditian, the applicable provisians afTitle 19 of the Chula Vista Municipal Cade shall apply. The Design District will attract business and cansumers afhame.impravement praducts and services. In arder to identify the location and efficiently guide th~ users to. their destination SL"I: types af signs are pravided far herein. Additianal minor an-site signs will be reviewed as part afthe AIcmtecture and Site Plan review. Fallawing appraval afamaster Use Permit for a Design District, the sign criteria contained in this section shall apply to. all signing within the area cavered by the Design District Overlay. Deviatians to. the sign standards herein may be appraved (up to. twenty percent by the Zaning Administratar ar greater than twenty percent by Design Review Cammittee) based upan the fallawing findings:- 1. That the sign is cansistent with the general quality and character of the EastLake Business Center II Planned Co=unity; 2. That the sign pravides a benefit to. the viability af the Design District; 3. That the sign provides a benefit to the customers af the Design District; 4. That the sign is campatible with the character of the ather signs in the Design District and its s=aundings. Sign Lacatians: Exhibit 15A, Sign Lacations by Type, indicates the canceptuallacations of the four freestanding sign types. The exact locatians will be established by appraval by the Design Review Cammittee. Additianal typical tenant signs on the buildings are shawn an Exhibit 15A-5, whaselacation is a campanent af the overall building design, subject to Design Review. Fants should be simple and clearíy legible, except that tenants may use their identity fonts. The calars af sign materials and letters shall be as shawn on the appraved Design Review drawings. . . : ~ 1-14-05 IlI-JO D· " ,a,~lg·., ·n DI;'-~n'c- ··t- ~.·l'g'· ·n" 'L' .0" J!';~t· '('on' 'c: by, - ,. T"~Y' P·· e, . 'G~t. '.- ø:.... 0:, , , . ua· -,~ . . , . ' . ., ...,,' . .: '.' '., '.... " . ,", .' - ," ".", - -. '. . . '-' . ,- ',. ....,. ',. -., . -,.," " .,~ ~, ,. ,'"' . - .", ~ . ~.", . - , A. 'Dî$.t!;icl rdfntffiç~n.iMønU¡:i!E¡¡jt B .Q~¢t'Erj¡,Y'WiijU~ "g T\!natl~ tdliì'ltffi¢a!ion,S!\:jJ'1' 'I) ~~~aÇjÌØJ;¡~i$tg~ ,~. . , .; ., .' , , " " . ; .. , . .R!;.';;;;;'" .....~, 1'..... ";,' '1"' . Jip¡ . ""...........~ 0..... j,¡.;!$ ~ibit: ':."" "¡IiI1\.~. .:1¡¡ ~·,,!,l"'-~,.",!,L.,', '.... ,are BfI,pr:oxïroate, MJecI te.OesifQ '. ew¡;¡w, LQë,~Q'ñ øf"S~" $ 9ii'bWrdírtg~or$hãll b$;a. Cb" tiëi'lf" t· - .- " ;œs' ··Ii ;~ - . ..I'...".....·,.,Ri:. ., lW~g .,...JS.," . ~ fti~¡;;¡" .~::.:w . ....,..~~. ·..~.T , <th~ : ".~-;-j District Identification Monument - Sign Type "An: This sign is located at the base of the slope bank at the intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Fenton Street. It is intended.to identify the district and the major tenants along this arterial highway. This maximum dimensions and criteria are illustrated on Exhibit 15A-l below: Max. Size: Base- 30.0' W x 5.0' H; Vertical element -15.0' W x 25.0' H Tenant Panels: (8) 2.5' H xl 0.0' Weach Logo & Copy to fit within 2'-0" H x 9'6" area illumination: Internally illuminated ffi=&.99 1-14-05- III-32 ,~.., ...... --.-----, x (tI- E o I Ò ~ ~ 1-14-05 b ,. Ñ o , iQ., Sign Type "At! i 15'·0" t Tßhant Pân~ls,(8 max.) at 10'-0" x ,2-6". Logo & Copy to be 9'-6" x 2'-0". ~O'~O" max. ~_ . ill-33 ! í __ ':, () District Identification Monument I TENANT 'TENANT T6.'i~"",,' . . .1·~.'V\t'!lI. .. I tENAm" I ~ANf I ÌE;NÞ.NT HI I ' ÌjÉÑÄÑT::J I 'tENANT I Exhibit 15A-l District Entry Monument - Sign Type "Boo: This sign identifies the entry to the Home Improvement District at the intersection of Fenton Street and Showroom Place to efficiently guide customers to the district. The criteria for this sign is illustrated on Exhibit 15A-2 below. Max. Size: 40.0' W x 9.0' H Letter size: District Name: 17"H Logo & Copy for Tenant Names: 8"H Maximum number of tenant names - 50 illmnination: Intemally illmninated : ffl9!.99 1-14-05 ID-34 .. .. cc 16 <DCD œJ:l (1),..0' J:I, 0 ..c C.... 0) .S1 en,' >:..".;:¡ ._Q;.... tn(/) 0. = OO'Oø OJ- ," 0": ''0 E -~- ' .... ,!I) - ,:::I ·c....'IIIE (II'£: '0"- c ~'Øì'ã ¡t£ E:1'E .. .. 1'1"",... .~ a.. ~ c ~ ."-i,J -- (f) o ) 10 'n 0,' : .. ø '0 ....J 'f-.- ,0 æ h ci> ã .O-,V' .O-,S . te=!r-99 1-14-05 ID-35 ,0 T b 'd" +' t: (1) e :J c o ,=æ >. ,.10. ....., C UJ ,...., p ..... .... .-. ';'--" Jf ;:;: ~ Exhibit 15A-2 Tenant Identification Sign - Sign Type "C": This sign directs customers along Showroom Place by indicating the best entry location to use for identified tenants. The criteria for this sign is illustrated on Exhibit 15A-3 below. Max. Size: 6.0' W x 7.0' H Tenant Panels: (5) IDS' H x 4.0' Weach Logo & Copy to fit within 5.25" x 3.7" area " lllumination: Externally illuminated ffl-!!-99 1-14-05 III-36 Sign Type "C" o ¡... - 4'-0" [::IEIS1~J - [:IEIS1~} V-~1 WIDE BE C ::IE1S1~ J WIDE I =t'" ~ [::IEIS1~J [=rEISI~J ~. .......c.. ~ >- a I- O' 6' 0" TENANT PANEL SIGNS o ~" HIGH X 4'-0" . MAXIMUM COPY TO 5-1/4-" HIGH X 3'-7" Tenant Identification Sign Exhibit 15A-3 . ~ 1-14-05 III-37 Project Directional Sign - Sign Type "D": After entering the district from an entry drive, this sign further directs a customer to the specific tenant location. The criteria for this sign is illustrated on Exhibit l5A-4 below. Max. Size: 2.5' W x. 5.0' H Copy to fit within 2-1/2" H x 2'-0" area Tenant panels - 5 Illumination: Non-illuminated . ~ 1·14-05 III-38 - ------ ---..-------..-- Sign Type "0" X co E b -' 1.0 2'-6" max. i t 5 TENANT SIGN PANELS @ 5" HIGH X 2'-6" WIDE. [:...... LEI'JÃ8J" _ MAXIMUM LOGO & COpy TO [ TENAISIT:::J BE 2-1/2" HIGH X 2'-0' WIDE. [_ LEI'JÃ8J" _ ] ~ [ - TENAISIT ~ ] =L{'J _ 0.: [ _ LEISWIT _ ] ';- ~ Project Directional Sign ~ 1-14-05 Exhibit lSA-4 . '. ill-39 Building Signs Tenant Sign on Tower Element (Refer to Exhibit l5A-5 below). These are for the tower element in the buildings and identify the primary tenant locations. Max. Size: 20.0' Wx 9' H Logo & Copy to fit within 9' H x 20' area (5' max. letter height) Illumination: Internally illuminated. General Tenant Sign on Buildings (Refer to Exhibit l5A-5 below). These are for individual tenants storefronts within buildings. Max. Size: ,70% of storefront width x 32" H 'Logo & Copy to fit within 2'-0" H x 70% storefront length area Illumination: Internally illuminated. , ~ 1-14-D5 III-40 ~ \-\4-05 Building Signs ~ Tenant Name TæantTag line. ", Tenant Sign on tower Element. :r: i 70% or less Df stoMfrcrrt wldlh ! ~c ! EEEBSGfa Design f tPlI''''''lIIíl!lDJIDI{\~ I M General Tenant Sign : III -41 E:thibit 15A-5